Social class in the United States - Wikipedia





	
	

	
	

	Social class in the United States

	
		From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

		

		

		
		

		Jump to navigation
		Jump to search
			
	This article needs to be updated. Please update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.  (February 2015)






Idea of grouping Americans by some measure of social status

  
Douglas Tilden's monument to the working and supporting classes along Market Street in the heart of San Francisco's Financial District



	This article is part of a series on
	Income in the
United States of America
	
	
Topics

	Household
	Personal
	Affluence


	Social class
	Income inequality
	gender pay gap
	ethnic wage gap






	
Lists by income

	States (by equality (Gini))
	Counties (highest / lowest)
	Locations (lowest)
	Metropolitan statistical areas


	Urban areas
	ZIP Code Tabulation Areas
	Ethnic groups




	
 United States portal
		v
	t
	e





Social class in the United States  refers to the idea of grouping Americans by some measure of social status, typically economic, however it could also refer to social status or location.[1] The idea that American society can be divided into social classes is disputed, and there are many competing class systems.[2]

Many Americans believe in a social class system that has three different groups or classes: the American rich, the American middle class, and the American poor. More complex models propose as many as a dozen class levels, including levels such as high upper class, upper class, upper middle class, middle class, lower middle class, lower class and lower lower middle class. [3][4] while others disagree with the American construct of social class completely.[5] Most definitions of a class structure group its members according to wealth, income, education, type of occupation, and membership within a hierarchy, specific subculture, or social network. Most concepts of American social class do not focus on race or ethnicity as a characteristic within the stratification system, although these factors are closely related.[6]

Sociologists Dennis Gilbert, William Thompson, Joseph Hickey, and James Henslin have proposed class systems with six distinct social classes. These class models feature an upper or capitalist class consisting of the rich and powerful, an upper middle class consisting of highly educated and affluent professionals, a middle class consisting of college-educated individuals employed in white-collar industries, a lower middle class composed of semi-professionals with typically some college education, a working class constituted by clerical and blue collar workers whose work is highly routinized, and a lower class divided between the working poor and the unemployed underclass.[3][7][8]


Contents


	1 Markers
	1.1 Social status
	1.2 Income
	1.2.1 Dual income controversy



	1.3 Education
	1.4 Culture



	2 Academic models
	2.1 Upper class
	2.1.1 Inherited wealth
	2.1.2 Corporate elite



	2.2 Upper middle
	2.3 Middle class
	2.3.1 Traditional middle class
	2.3.2 Lower middle class



	2.4 Working class



	3 Agriculture
	3.1 Farm workers
	3.2 Farmers



	4 Class and health
	5 Class and politics
	6 Inequality and crisp definition of any existent class groupings
	7 In popular culture
	8 See also
	9 References
	10 Further reading
	11 External links





Markers[edit]

  
Class in the United States, featuring occupational descriptions by Thompson & Hickey as well as United States Census Bureau data pertaining to personal income and educational attainment for those age 25 or older.



Some definitions of class look only at numerical measures such as wealth or income. Others take into account qualitative factors, such as education, culture, and social status. There is no consensus on which of these variables is essential and which are merely common correlates. It is also disputed whether sharp lines can be drawn; one point of view in the debate:


A stratified society is one marked by inequality, by differences among people that are regarded as being higher or lower…it is logically possible for a society to be stratified in a continuous gradation between high and low without any sharp lines…in reality…there is only a limited number of types of occupations…People in similar positions…grow similar in their thinking and lifestyle…they form a pattern, and this pattern creates social class.
— Dennis Gilbert, The American Class Structure, 1998[3]


Social status[edit]


It is impossible to understand people's behavior…without the concept of social stratification, because class position has a pervasive influence on almost everything…the clothes we wear…the television shows we watch…the colors we paint our homes in and the names we give our pets…Our position in the social hierarchy affects our health, happiness, and even how long we will live.
— William Thompson and Joseph Hickey, Society in Focus, 2005[7]


Social class is sometimes presented as a description of how members of the society have sorted themselves along a continuum of positions varying in importance, influence, prestige, and compensation. In these models, certain occupations are considered to be desirable and influential, while others are considered to be menial, repetitive, and unpleasant. (In some cases, non-occupational roles such as a parent or volunteer mentor, are also considered.[7]) Generally, the higher the ranking on such a scale, the higher the skill and education levels required to perform it.

Some sociologists consider the higher income and prestige of higher ranked jobs to simply be incentives to encourage members of society to obtain the skills necessary to perform important work.[9] This is an important mechanism in the economic theory of capitalism, and is compatible with the notion that class is mutable and determined by a combination of choices and opportunities.

In other cases, class or status is inherited. For example, being the son or daughter of a wealthy individual, may carry a higher status and different cultural connotations than being a member of nouveau riche ("new money") or have a planned path of positive freedom. Those taking the functionalist approach to sociology and economics view social classes as components essential for the survival of complex societies such as American society.[7]


Income[edit]

Main articles: Personal income in the United States and Household income in the United States

Median income levels
	Households
	Persons, age 25 or older with earnings
	Household income by race or ethnicity

	All households
	Dual earner
households
	Per household
member
	Males
	Females
	Both sexes
	Asian
	Non-Hispanic White
	Hispanic
(of any race)
	Black

	$46,326	$67,348	$23,535	$39,403	$26,507	$32,140	$57,518	$48,977	$34,241	$30,134



Median personal income by educational attainment
	Measure	Some High School	High school graduate	Some college	Associate's degree	Bachelor's degree or higher	Bachelor's degree	Master's degree	Professional degree	Doctorate degree

	Persons, age 25+ w/ earnings	$20,321	$26,505	$31,054	$35,009	$49,303	$43,143	$52,390	$82,473	$70,853

	Male, age 25+ w/ earnings	$24,192	$32,085	$39,150	$42,382	$60,493	$52,265	$67,123	$100,000	$78,324

	Female, age 25+ w/ earnings	$15,073	$21,117	$25,185	$29,510	$40,483	$36,532	$45,730	$66,055	$54,666

	Persons, age 25+, employed full-time	$25,039	$31,539	$37,135	$40,588	$56,078	$50,944	$61,273	$100,000	$79,401

	Household	$22,718	$36,835	$45,854	$51,970	$73,446	$68,728	$78,541	$100,000	$96,830



Household income distribution
	Bottom 10%	Bottom 20%	Bottom 25%	Middle 33%	Middle 20%	Top 25%	Top 20%	Top 5%	Top 1.5%	Top 1%

	$0 to $10,500	$0 to $18,500	$0 to $22,500	$30,000 to $62,500	$35,000 to $55,000	$77,500 and up	$92,000 and up	$167,000 and up	$250,000 and up	$350,000 and up

	Source: US Census Bureau, 2006; income statistics for the year 2005



Income in the United States is most commonly measured by United States Census Bureau in terms of either household or individual and remains one of the most prominent indicators of class status. As 82% of all households, 16% of those in the top quintiles, had two income earners the discrepancy between household and personal income is quite considerable. In 2005 the top 95% of income earners made $12,500 or more, while 18% of households had incomes over $100,000. Personal income is largely the result of scarcity. As individuals who hold higher status positions tend to possess rare skills or assume positions society deems very essential, have higher incomes.[citation needed] Overall the median household income was $46,326 in 2005[10] while the median personal income (including only those above the age of 25) was $32,140.[11]

Per capita household income, the income a household is able to allocate to each member of the household is also an important variable in determining a given household's standard of living. A high household income may be offset by a large household size; thus, resulting in a low per capita household income.[3] In 2005, the median household income per capita was $24,672.[10]



It should be stressed...that a position does not bring power and prestige because it draws a high income. Rather, it draws a high income because it is functionally important and the available personnel are for one reason or another scarce. It is therefore superficial and erroneous to regard high income as the cause of a man's power and prestige, just as it is erroneous to think that a man's fever is the cause of his disease...The economic source of power and prestige is not income primarily, but the ownership of capital goods (including patents, good will, and professional reputation). Such ownership should be distinguished from the possession of consumers' goods, which is an index rather than a cause of social standing.
— Kingsley Davis and Wilbert E. Moore, Some Principles of Stratification, 1945[12]


In the passage above, Davis and Moore argue that income is one of the most prominent features of social class; it is not one of its causes. In other words, income does not determine the status of an individual or household but rather reflects on that status. Some say that income and prestige are the incentives provided by society in order to fill needed positions with the most qualified and motivated personnel possible.[9]

The New York Times has used income quintiles to define class. It has assigned the quintiles from lowest to highest as lower class, lower middle class, middle class, upper middle class, and upper class.[13] These definitions equate class with income, permitting people to move from class to class as their income changes.


Dual income controversy[edit]

  
Percentage of 2+ income households in each of the quintiles (1/5 of the population).[14]



Income is one of the most commonly used attributes of a household to determine its class status. The relationship between income, which mostly arises from the scarcity of a certain skill, may however, prove to be more complex than initially perceived.[9] While the idea is that income reflects status, household income may just be the product of two or more incomes.

In 2005, 82% of American households had two income earners. The vast majority (77%) of households in the top quintile had two or more income earners. This means that the majority of household income in the top quintile are the result of two income earners pooling their resources, establishing a close link between perceived affluence and the number of income earners in a given household.[8][14] This raises the question of whether or not the combination of incomes results in higher social status. Of course, there is no definite answer as class is a vague sociological concept.[7]



The parade of income earners with height representing income suggest that the relationship between the distribution of income and the class structure is...blurred in the middle...we saw dual-income working class marchers looking down on single-income upper-middle class marchers. In sum, the class structure as we have defined it...does not exactly match the distribution of household income.
— Dennis Gilbert, The American Class Structure, 1998[3]


Sociologist Dennis Gilbert states that it is possible for households to out-earn other households over higher class standing through increasing their number of income earners. He furthermore states that household size also played an essential role, as the standard of living for two persons living off one upper middle class personal income may very well be higher than that of a household with four members living off two working class personal incomes.[3]

The combination of two or more incomes allows for households to increase their income substantially without moving higher on the occupational ladder or attaining higher educational degrees. Thus it is important to remember that the favorable economic position of households in the top two quintiles is in some cases the result of combined income, rather than demand for a single worker.[14]


Education[edit]

Main article: Educational attainment in the United States

  
Educational attainment is related to both occupation, as seen above, and income. This graph shows the educational attainment of individuals age 25–64, employed full-time, by occupational field.[15]



Tertiary education (or "higher education") is required for many middle-class professions, depending on how the term middle class is to be defined. Tertiary education is rarely free, but the costs vary widely: tuition at elite private colleges often exceeds $200,000 for a four-year program, although financial aid may be significant. On the other hand, public colleges and universities typically charge much less, particularly for state residents.

Also, scholarships offered by universities and government do exist, and low-interest loans are available. Still, the average cost of education, by all accounts, is increasing. The attainment of post-secondary and graduate degrees is the perhaps most important feature of a middle and upper middle class person with the university being regarded as the most essential institution and gatekeeper of the professional middle class.[7][16] Educational attainment is also directly linked to income.

In 2005, the vast majority of those with doctorate and professional degrees were among the nation's top 15% of income earners.[17] Those with bachelor's degrees had incomes considerably above the national median while the median income for those with some college education remained near the national median. According to United States Census Bureau, 9% of persons aged 25 or older had a graduate degree, 27.9% had a bachelor's degree or more with 53% having attended college.[17][18]

With 85% of the population having graduated from high school, it becomes apparent that the average American does not have a college degree, but is likely to have attended college for some time and has graduated from high school. Overall, educational attainment serves as the perhaps most essential class feature of most Americans, being directly linked to income and occupation.[19]


	Year 2005
	Less than 9th grade
	No high school diploma
	High school graduate
	Some college
	Associate degree
	Bachelor's degree
	Bachelor's degree or more
	Graduate degree
	Master's degree
	Professional degree
	Doctorate

	% in Group
	6.1%
	8.4%
	31.7%
	16.7%
	8.73%
	18.3%
	27.9%
	9.7%
	6.8%
	1.6%
	1.3%

	Median personal income
	$17,422
	$20,321
	$26,505
	$31,054
	$35,009
	$43,143
	$49,303
	$59,826
	$52,390
	$82,473
	$70,853



Source: United States Census Bureau, 2005[20]


Culture[edit]

See also: Working class in the United States

Broadly speaking, the United States aspires to be an egalitarian country with social mobility; the American Dream includes the idea from the Declaration of Independence that "all men are created equal" and have the "unalienable right" to "Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness". The phrase "second-class citizen" has a strong negative connotation in national politics. In practice, socioeconomic mobility in the United States is relatively low compared to Nordic countries and Canada, and income inequality in the United States is relatively high. Educational attainment and income are strongly correlated, but relatively low funding for K-12 schools in poor neighborhoods raises concerns about a cycle of poverty. These apparent contradictions lead to divergent views on whether American society is divided into distinct classes or should be analyzed that way.

In some American subcultures, people considered to be of a particular race, ethnicity, income range, educational background, religion, or gender are a significant majority; for example, hip-hop culture vs. preppy culture or fans of water polo vs. NASCAR.  Other subcultures are relatively diverse.

Once defined, social classes can be considered to feature their own sub-cultures, including different ways of socializing children.[7] Due to class mobility individuals may also acculturate to the culture of another class when ascending or descending in the social order. All social classes in the United States, except the upper class, consist of tens of millions of people. Thus social classes form social groups so large that they feature considerable diversity within and any statement regarding a given social class' culture needs to be seen as a broad generalization.

Since 1970, sociologists Paula LeMasters and Melvin Kohl have set out repeatedly to research class-based cultures. Class culture has been shown to have a strong influence on the mundane lives of people, affecting everything from the manner in which they raise their children, initiation and maintenance of romantic relationship to the color in which they paint their houses.[7] The strongest cultural differences seem to run along the professional middle class-working class divide.[21] A recent increase in residential class segregation and the overall tendency of individual to associate mostly with those of equal standing as themselves has further strengthened class differences.[3][22]

Parental views are perhaps the most essential factor in determining the socialization process which shapes new members of society.[7] The values and standards used in child rearing are commonly closely related to the parent's occupational status.[3] Parents from the professional class tend to raise their children to become curious independent thinkers, while working-class parents raise their children to have a more communal perspective with a strong respect for authority.[3] Middle-class parents tend to emphasize internal standards and values while working-class parents emphasize external values.[3]

Sociologist Dennis Gilbert uses a list of values identified by Melvin Kohn to be typical of the professional middle and working class. Middle-class parents' values for their children and themselves included: "Consideration of Others, Self-Control, Curiosity, Happiness, Honesty, Tolerance of Nonconformity, Open to Innovation…Self-Direction." This contrasted with surveyed working class individuals, who reported: "Manners, Obedience…Neatness, Cleanliness, Strong Punishment of Deviant Behavior, Stock to Old Ways, People not Trustworthy…Strict Leadership" as values for themselves and their children. There is a strong correlation between these values and the occupational activities of the respondents. The job characteristics of middle class respondents included: "Work Independently, Varied Tasks, Work with People or Data," versus working-class parents of reported "Close Supervision and Repetitive Work…"[3]



Not once in a professional middle-class home did I see a young boy shake his father's hand in a well-taught manly gesture...Not once did I hear a middle-class parent scornfully-or even sympathetically-call a crying boy a sissy or in any way reprimand him for his tears...even as young as six or seven, the working-class boys seemed more emotionally controlled-more like miniature men-than those in the middle-class families.
— Lillian Rubin, Worlds of Pain, 1976[23]


Gender roles are also viewed differently by those in the higher and lower social classes. Middle class individuals, who were more open towards "nonconformity" and emphasized individual self-direction as well as critical thinking, were also less stringent in their application of gender roles. Working class individuals, on the other hand, emphasized gender roles. While working-class people have more and more assimilated to middle class culture regarding their view and application of gender roles, differences remain. Professional class people are more likely to have an egalitarian distribution of work in their household with both spouses being equals in heterosexual marriages. According to Dennis Gilbert, "College life, generally a prologue to upper-middle class careers, delays marriage and encourages informal, relatively egalitarian association between men and women."[3][8]


Academic models[edit]

The following are reported income-, education-, and occupation-based terms for specific classes commonly used by sociologists.


Academic class models
	Dennis Gilbert, 2002
	William Thompson & Joseph Hickey, 2005
	Leonard Beeghley, 2004

	Class
	Typical characteristics
	Class
	Typical characteristics
	Class
	Typical characteristics

	Capitalist class (1%)
	Top-level executives, high-rung politicians, heirs. Ivy League education common.
	Upper class (1%)
	Top-level executives, celebrities, heirs; income of $500,000+ common. Ivy league education common.
	The super-rich (0.9%)
	Multi-millionaires whose incomes commonly exceed $350,000; includes celebrities and powerful executives/politicians. Ivy League education common.

	Upper middle class[1] (15%)
	Highly-educated (often with graduate degrees), most commonly salaried, professionals and middle management with large work autonomy.
	Upper middle class[1] (15%)
	Highly-educated (often with graduate degrees) professionals & managers with household incomes varying from the high 5-figure range to commonly above $100,000.
	The rich (5%)
	Households with net worth of $1 million or more; largely in the form of home equity. Generally have college degrees.

	Middle class (plurality/
majority?; ca. 46%)
	College-educated workers with considerably higher-than-average incomes and compensation; a man making $57,000 and a woman making $40,000 may be typical.

	Lower middle class (30%)
	Semi-professionals and craftsmen with a roughly average standard of living. Most have some college education and are white-collar.
	Lower middle class (32%)
	Semi-professionals and craftsmen with some work autonomy; household incomes commonly range from $35,000 to $75,000. Typically, some college education.

	Working class (30%)
	Clerical and most blue-collar workers whose work is highly routinized. Standard of living varies depending on number of income earners, but is commonly just adequate. High school education.

	Working class (32%)
	Clerical, pink- and blue-collar workers with often low job security; common household incomes range from $16,000 to $30,000. High school education.
	Working class
(ca. 40–45%)
	Blue-collar workers and those whose jobs are highly routinized with low economic security; a man making $40,000 and a woman making $26,000 may be typical. High school education.

	Working poor (13%)
	Service, low-rung clerical and some blue-collar workers. High economic insecurity and risk of poverty. Some high school education.

	Lower class (ca. 14–20%)
	Those who occupy poorly-paid positions or rely on government transfers. Some high school education.

	Underclass (12%)
	Those with limited or no participation in the labor force. Reliant on government transfers. Some high school education.
	The poor (ca. 12%)
	Those living below the poverty line with limited to no participation in the labor force; a household income of $18,000 may be typical. Some high school education.

	
	References:  Gilbert, D. (2002) The American Class Structure: In An Age of Growing Inequality. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, ISBN 0534541100. (see also Gilbert Model);
	Thompson, W. & Hickey, J. (2005). Society in Focus. Boston, MA: Pearson, Allyn & Bacon; Beeghley, L. (2004). The Structure of Social Stratification in the United States. Boston, MA: Pearson, Allyn & Bacon.
	1 The upper middle class may also be referred to as "Professional class" Ehrenreich, B. (1989). The Inner Life of the Middle Class. NY, NY: Harper-Collins.









Upper class[edit]

Further information: American upper class

This term is applied to a wide array of elite groups existing in the United States of America. The term commonly includes the so-called "blue bloods" (multi-generational wealth combined with leadership of high society) such as the Astor or Roosevelt families. Twentieth century sociologist W. Lloyd Warner divided the upper class into two sections: the "upper-upper class" (or bourgeoisie) and "lower-upper class" (or "scoobs"). The former includes established upper-class families while the latter includes those with great wealth. As there is no defined lower threshold for the upper class it is difficult, if not outright impossible, to determine the exact number or percentage of American households that could be identified as being members of the upper-class(es).

Income and wealth statistics may serve as a helpful guideline as they can be measured in a more objective manner. In 2005, approximately one and a half percent (1.5%) of households in the United States had incomes exceeding $250,000 with the top 5% having incomes exceeding $157,000.[24] Furthermore, only 2.6% of households held assets (excluding home equity) of more than one-million dollars. One could therefore fall under the assumption that less than five percent of American society are members of rich households. The richest 1% of the American population owns as much as the combined wealth of the bottom 90%,[25] or perhaps even more.[26]

Members of the upper class control and own significant portions of corporate America and may exercise indirect power through the investment of capital. The high salaries and the potential for amassing great wealth through stock options have greatly increased the power and visibility of the "corporate elite". There is disagreement over whether the "nouveau riche" should be included as members of the upper class or whether this term should exclusively be used for established families. Many sociologists and commentators make a distinction between the upper class (in the sense of those in the families of inherited wealth) and the corporate elite. By implication, the upper class is held in lower regard (as inheritors of idle wealth) than the self-made millionaires in prestigious occupations.[27]


Inherited wealth[edit]

Yet another important feature of the upper class is that of inherited privilege. While most Americans, including those in the upper-middle class need to actively maintain their status, some upper class persons do not need to work in order to maintain their status. Status tends to be passed on from generation to generation without each generation having to re-certify its status.[16] Overall, the upper class is financially the best compensated and one of the most influential socio-economic classes in American society.


Corporate elite[edit]

The high salaries and, especially, the potential wealth through stock options, has supported the term corporate elite or corporate class. Top executives, including Chief Executive Officers, are among the financially best compensated occupations in the United States. The median annual earnings for a CEO in the United States were $140,350[28] (exceeding the income of more than 90% of United States households). The Wall Street Journal reports the median compensation for CEOs of 350 major corporations was $6,000,000 in 2005 with most of the money coming from stock options.[29]

In New York City in 2005, the median income (including bonuses) of a corporate "chief operating officer" (the No. 2 job) was $377,000.[30] The total compensation for a "top IT officer" in charge of information technology in New York City was $218,000.[31] Thus even below the CEO level of top corporations, financial compensation will usually be sufficient to propel households with a mere one income earner in the top 1%. In 2005 only 1.5% of American households had incomes above $250,000 with many reaching this level only through having two income earners.[24][32][33]



Top executives are among the highest paid workers in the United States economy. However, salary levels vary substantially depending on the level of managerial responsibility; length of service; and type, size, and location of the firm. For example, a top manager in a very large corporation can earn significantly more than a counterpart in a small firm.
Median annual earnings of general and operations managers in May 2004 were $77,420. The middle 50% earned between $52,420 and $118,310. Because the specific responsibilities of general and operations managers vary significantly within industries, earnings also tend to vary considerably...the median annual earnings of chief executives in May 2004 were $140,350; although chief executives in some industries earned considerably more...the median income of chief executive officers in the nonprofit sector was $88,006 in 2005, but some of the highest chief executives made more than $700,000.
— United States Department of Labor[citation needed]


Many politically powerful people make money before coming to office, but in general the political power elite have official incomes in the $150,000 to $185,000 range; members of Congress are paid $174,000, and are effectively required to have a residence in their district as well as one in Washington.[34]


Upper middle[edit]

Further information: American middle class § The Professional/Managerial middle class

The upper middle class consists of highly educated salaried professionals whose work is largely self-directed. Many have advanced graduate degrees and household incomes commonly exceed the high five-figure range. Members of this class commonly value higher education – most holding advanced academic degrees – and are often involved with personal and professional networks including professional organizations. The upper middle class tends to have great influence over the course of society.[3]

Occupations which require high educational attainment are well compensated and are held in high public esteem. Physicians, lawyers, accountants, engineers, scientists and professors are largely considered to be upper middle class.[16] The very well educated are seen as trendsetters; the anti-smoking, pro-fitness, and organic food movements, as well as environmentalism, are largely indigenous to this socio-economic grouping. Education serves as perhaps the most important value and also the most dominant entry barrier of the upper middle class.[7][22]

Sociologists Dennis Gilbert, Willam Thompson, and Joseph Hickey estimate the upper middle class to constitute roughly 15% of the population (or roughly three in every twenty persons). The hallmark of this class is its high educational attainment.


Middle class[edit]

Main article: American middle class



The middle class is perhaps the most vaguely defined of the social classes.[4] The term can be used either to describe a relative elite of professionals and managers[16] – also called the upper middle class – or it can be used to describe those in-between the extremes of wealth, disregarding considerable differences in income, culture, educational attainment, influence, and occupation.

As with all social classes in the United States, there are no definite answers as to what is and what is not middle class. Sociologists such as Dennis Gilbert, James Henslin, William Thompson, and Joseph Hickey have brought forth class models in which the middle class is divided into two sections that combined constitute 47% to 49% of the population. The upper middle or professional class constitutes the upper end of the middle class which consists of highly educated, well-paid professionals with considerable work autonomy. The lower end of the middle class – called either lower middle class or just middle class – consists of semi-professionals, craftsmen, office staff, and sales employees who often have college degrees and are very loosely supervised.[3][7][8]



Everyone wants to believe they are middle class. For people on the bottom and the top of the wage scale the phrase connotes a certain Regular Joe cachet. But this eagerness to be part of the group has led the definition to be stretched like a bungee cord. 

— Dante Chinni, the Christian Science Monitor[35]




Although income thresholds cannot be determined since social classes lack distinct boundaries and tend to overlap, sociologists and economists have put forward certain income figures they find indicative of middle class households. Sociologist Leonard Beeghley identifies a husband making roughly $57,000 and a wife making roughly $40,000 with a household income of roughly $97,000 as a typical middle-class family.[36]

Sociologists William Thompson and Joseph Hickey identify household incomes between $35,000 and $75,000 as typical for the lower middle and $100,000 or more as typical for the upper middle class.[7] Though it needs to be noted that household income distribution neither reflects standard of living nor class status with complete accuracy.[3]


Traditional middle class[edit]

Further information: Average Joe and American middle class § Statistical middle class

  
Many primary and secondary level teachers in the United States are in the middle class.



Those households more or less at the center of society may be referred to as being part of the American middle or middle-middle class in vernacular language use. In the academic models featured in this article, however, the middle class does not constitute a strong majority of the population. Those in the middle of the socio-economic strata—the proverbial Average Joe—are commonly in the area where the working and lower middle class overlap.

The most prominent academic models split the middle class into two sections. Yet, it remains common for the term middle class to be applied for anyone in between either extreme of the socio-economic strata. The middle class is then often sub-divided into an upper-middle, middle-middle, and lower-middle class. In colloquial descriptions of the class system the middle-middle class may be described as consisting of those in the middle of the social strata. Politicians and television personalities such as Lou Dobbs can be seen using the term middle class in this manner, especially when discussing the middle-class squeeze.[4][37] The wide discrepancy between the academic models and public opinions that lump highly educated professionals together in the same class with secretaries may lead to the conclusion that public opinion on the subject has become largely ambiguous.[3]


Lower middle class[edit]

The lower middle class is, as the name implies, generally defined as those less privileged than the middle class. People in this class commonly work in supporting occupations.

Sociologists Dennis Gilbert, William Thompson, and Joseph Hickey, however, only divide the middle class into two groups. In their class modes the middle class only consists of an upper and lower middle class. The upper middle class, as described above, constitutes roughly 15% of the population with highly educated white collar professionals who commonly have salaries in the high-5-figure range and household incomes in the low-6-figure range. Semi-professionals with some college degrees constitute the lower middle class. Their class models show the lower middle class positioned slightly above the middle of the socio-economic strata. Those in blue- and pink-collar as well as clerical occupations are referred to as working class in these class models.[3][7]


Working class[edit]

Definitions of the term working class vary greatly. While Lloyd Warner found the vast majority of the American population to be in either the upper-lower class or lower-lower class in 1949, modern-day experts such as Michael Zweig, an economist for Stony Brook University, argue that the working class constitutes most of the population.[38]

Dennis Gilbert places 13% of households among the "working poor" with 12% being in the "underclass". Thompson & Hickey place roughly 17% to 20% of households in the lower classes. The lower classes constituting roughly a fifth to a quarter of American society consists mainly of low-rung retail and service workers as well as the frequently unemployed and those not able to work.[3][7][8] Overall, 13% of the population fall below the poverty threshold. Hunger and food insecurity were present in the lives of 3.9% of American households, while roughly twenty-five million Americans (ca. 9%) participated in the food stamp program.[39]


Agriculture[edit]

Further information: Agricultural history of the United States and Social class in American history

Farm workers[edit]

Before industrialization, "yeoman farmers"—self-sufficient, politically independent landowners—made up a large portion of the country's population. Jeffersonian democracy and Jacksonian democracy successfully expanded the political rights of the yeomen, and the geographical extent of the nation to provide them farms. This culminated in the Homestead Act of 1862 which provided hundreds of thousands of free farms. Before 1865 large southern plantations used slaves. After emancipation, a system of sharecropping and tenant farming for both whites and blacks in the South provided a semi-independent status for farmers who did not own their land. In contemporary times, migrant agricultural workers—mostly Mexicans—perform field and packing work.[40]


Farmers[edit]

Only 0.7% of the population of the United States is employed in the agricultural sector.[41] Most are proprietors of independent farms. Once the dominant American social class, this group diminished in overall numbers during the 20th century, as farm holdings grew more consolidated, farming operations became more mechanized, and most of the population migrated to urban areas.[3]

Today, the agricultural sector has essentially taken on the characteristics of business and industry generally. In contemporary usage, a "farmer" is someone who owns and operates a farm, which more often than not will be a sizable business enterprise; "agricultural workers" or "farm workers", who perform the actual work associated with farming, typically come out of the lower classes; indeed, they are often near-destitute immigrants or migrant farm workers. In this respect, farming mirrors big business: like any enterprise, a farm has owners (who may be a family or a corporation), salaried managers, supervisors, foremen and workers.

With the number of farms steadily diminishing, the stereotypical humble homestead is increasingly the exception, for viable farming now means agribusiness; the large amounts of capital required to operate a competitive farm require large-scale organization. The large landowners in California's Central Valley, Coachella Valley and Imperial Valley fall squarely within the upper class. Among farmers, "income" in the conventional sense is not an accurate standard of wealth measurement, because farmers typically keep their official income low by placing their assets into farming corporations rather than drawing the money directly. The stereotypical poor, marginal farmer "eking out a living" from the soil, an image deeply ingrained in most Americans' minds by folklore, films, and even history texts, has now been largely displaced by agribusiness, which has bought them out and consolidated their holdings.[42]


Class and health[edit]

Further information: Rural health
  
A homeless American citizen. (August 4, 2005)



Income also had a significant impact on health as those with higher incomes had better access to healthcare facilities, higher life expectancy, lower infant mortality rate and increased health consciousness. In 2006, Harvard researchers divided the United States into "eight Americas."[43]

Life expectancy ranges from 84.9 years for Asian-Americans who had an average per capita income of $21,566, to 71.1 years for urban African-Americans with an average per capita income of $14,800.[43]

Furthermore, like other post-industrial nations, the United States saw increased health consciousness among persons of higher social status. Persons of higher status are less likely to smoke, more likely to exercise regularly, and be more conscious of their diet.[44] Additionally, poorer Americans are more likely to consume lower quality, processed foods. One can therefore conclude that low socio-economic status contributes to a person's likelihood of being obese.[45][46]


Class and politics[edit]

Further information: Household income in the United States, Personal income in the United States, Educational attainment in the United States, and Investment theory of politics

  
A study by Larry Bartels found a positive correlation between Senate votes and opinions of high income people, conversely, low income people had a negative correlation with Senate votes.[47]



Income remains one of the main indicators of class, as it commonly reflects educational attainment as well as occupation.[9] A frequent distinction in political attitudes can be found among individuals residing in households with differing incomes.[7] For example, during the 2000 United States presidential election, voter turnout among those in the top 26% with household incomes exceeding $75,000 was 27% higher than the average.[48]


Inequality and crisp definition of any existent class groupings[edit]

Some academics consider American society sociologically and economically fragmented in such a manner that no clear class distinctions can be made. This means that there are no pronounced breaks in socioeconomic strata, which makes class division highly subjective and disputable.[2] Others, such as sociologist Dennis Gilbert, dispute the concept of a well-mixed society, and claim that distinct social networks can be identified for each class. W. Lloyd Warner also asserts the existence of class markers:



We are proud of those facts of American life that fit the pattern we are taught but somehow we are often ashamed of those equally important social facts which demonstrate the presence of social class. Consequently, we tend to deny them, or worse, denounce them and by doing so we tend to deny their existence and magically make them disappear from consciousness.
— W. Lloyd Warner, What is Social Class in America, 1949[5]


Warner asserts that social class is as old as civilization itself and has been present in nearly every society from before the Roman Empire, through medieval times, and to the modern-day United States. He believes that complex societies such as the United States need an equally complex social hierarchy.[5]


In popular culture[edit]

The existence of class differences in American society has long been the focus of popular culture, whether in the form of books, films, or plays. Social class, for example, is a theme used in the 1948 production Mister Roberts, in a scene where the ship's captain displays resentment toward the title character, contrasting his own impoverished background to that of Roberts himself:


	I think you're a pretty smart boy. I may not talk very good, Mister, but I know how to take care of smart boys. Let me tell you something. Let me tell you a little secret. I hate your guts, you college son-of-a-****! You think you're better than I am! You think you're better because you've had everything handed to you. Let me tell you something, Mister – I've worked since I was ten years old, and all my life I've known you superior bastards. I knew you people when I was a kid in Boston and I worked in eating-places and you ordered me around … "Oh bus-boy! My friend here seems to have thrown up on the table. Clean it up, please!" I started going to sea as a steward and I worked for you then … "Steward, take my magazine out to the deck chair!" … "Steward, I don't like your looks. Please keep out of my way as much as possible!" Well, I took that crap! I took that for years from pimple-faced bastards who weren't good enough to wipe my nose! And now I don't have to take it any more! There's a war on, by God, and I'm the Captain and you can wipe my nose! The worst thing I can do to you is to keep you on this ship! And that's where you're going to stay! Now get out of here.[49]


See also[edit]


	United States portal




	American gentry
	Global elite
	Income inequality in the United States
	Racial inequality in the United States
	Social class in American history
	Class: A Guide Through the American Status System
	Social stratification




References[edit]


	^ 
"What is social class?". University of Delaware. Retrieved June 10, 2019.

	^ a b 
Eichar, Douglas (1989). Occupation and Class Consciousness in America. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press. ISBN 0-313-26111-3.

	^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s 
Gilbert, Dennis (1998). The American Class Structure. New York, NY: Wadsworth Publishing. ISBN 0-534-50520-1.

	^ a b c 
"Middle class according to The Drum Major Institute for public policy". Retrieved July 25, 2006.

	^ a b c 
Warner, Lloyd; Marchia Meeker; Kenneth Eells (1949). What is Social Class in America, Lloyd Warner. New York, NY: Irvington Publishers.

	^ 
Noeel, Reginald (2018). "Race, Economics, and Social Status" (PDF). BLS.

	^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o 
Thompson, William (2005). Society in Focus : An Introduction to Sociology. Hickey, Joseph V. (5th ed.). Boston [Mass.]: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon. ISBN 0-205-41365-X. OCLC 56200299.

	^ a b c d e 
Williams, Brian; Stacey C. Sawyer; Carl M. Wahlstrom (2005). Marriages, Families & Intimate Relationships. Boston, MA: Pearson. ISBN 0-205-36674-0.

	^ a b c d 
Levine, Rhonda (1998). Social Class and Stratification. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 0-8476-8543-8.

	^ a b 
"United States Census Bureau, household income, 2006". Archived from the original on December 30, 2006. Retrieved February 8, 2007.

	^ 
"United States Census Bureau, median income of persons, age 25 or older". Archived from the original on March 19, 2007. Retrieved December 9, 2006.

	^ 
Davis, Kingsley; Moore, Wilbert E. (1945). "Some Principles of Stratification". American Sociological Review. 10 (2): 242. doi:10.2307/2085643. ISSN 0003-1224. JSTOR 2085643.

	^ 
"New York Times definition of class according to the quintiles". The New York Times. May 15, 2005. Retrieved July 8, 2006.

	^ a b c 
"United States Census Bureau, Income earners by quintile". Archived from the original on July 20, 2006. Retrieved October 25, 2006.

	^ 
"United States Census Bureau report on educational attainment in the United States, 2003" (PDF). Retrieved July 31, 2006.

	^ a b c d 
Ehrenreich, Barbara (1989). Fear of Falling, The Inner Life of the Middle Class. New York, NY: Harper Collins. ISBN 0-06-097333-1.

	^ a b 
"United States Census Bureau, income distribution of individuals, employed full-time, year round, age 25–64, 2006". Archived from the original on September 29, 2006. Retrieved December 27, 2006.

	^ 
"United States Census Bureau, 2005, data published on Infoplease.com". Retrieved January 12, 2007.

	^ 
"United States Census Bureau report on educational attainment in the United States, 2003" (PDF). Retrieved January 12, 2006.

	^ 
"United States Census Bureau, educational attainment and income, age 25+, 2006". Archived from the original on March 19, 2007. Retrieved January 13, 2007.

	^ 
Leondar-Wright, Betsy (2005). "Are There Class Cultures?". Differences between activists steadily employed & not. ClassMatters.org (Class Matters Workshop - Opportunities to practice cross-class bridging skills). Archived from the original on December 16, 2005. Retrieved August 21, 2018. Lay summary (PDF)→ Clearest examples of a Class Culture: Families w/ 3 or more generations in the same class in the U.S. → Recent class mobility, recent immigration, & living in the "gray area" between 2 classes all muddy the waters. Many people's experience is of a mixed class culture. Differences of experience socialize most American people. Make visible some class-culture-based coalition behaviours & dynamics that are too often invisible. Steady Work for Low-Income: Impossible &/or Not Expected. Steady Work for Working-Class & Middle-Class: Inevitable & Necessary. Steady Work for Owning-Class: Optional

	^ a b 
Zweig, Michael (2004). What's Class Got To Do With It, American Society in the Twenty-First Century. New York, NY: Cornell University Press. ISBN 0-8014-8899-0.

	^ 
Rubin, Lillian (1976). Worlds of pain : life in the working-class family. New York: Basic Books. p. 126. ISBN 0-465-09245-4. OCLC 2332040.

	^ a b 
"United States Census Bureau, income quintiles and Top 5%, 2004". Archived from the original on July 20, 2006. Retrieved July 8, 2006.

	^ The Hidden Wealth of the Richest 1%

	^ PolitiFact | Michael Moore movie says that top 1 percent owns more financial wealth than bottom 95 percent

	^ Peter W. Cookson and Caroline Hodges Persell, Preparing for Power: America's Elite Boarding Schools (1987)

	^ 
"Median annual earnings of CEOs according to the United States Department of Labor". Retrieved August 29, 2006.

	^ 
"Income sources of top corporate personnel". Retrieved August 28, 2006.

	^ 
"Salaries for top level corporate personnel". Retrieved August 28, 2006.

	^ 
"Salaries of CEOs". Retrieved August 28, 2006.

	^ 
"United States Census 2005 Economic Survey, income data". Archived from the original on June 30, 2006. Retrieved June 29, 2006.

	^ 
"Salaries of politicians lower than that of top-level corporate personnel". Retrieved August 28, 2006.

	^ 
"Economic statutes pertaining to congressmen". Retrieved February 15, 2007.

	^ 
"The Christian Science Monitor, What is middle class?". Retrieved August 28, 2006.

	^ 
Beeghley, Leonard (2004). The Structure of Social Stratification in the United States. New York, NY: Pearson. ISBN 0-205-37558-8.

	^ 
"Middle income can't buy Middle class lifestyle". Archived from the original on December 30, 2005. Retrieved July 25, 2006.

	^ 
Zweig, Michael (2001). The Working Class Majority: America's Best Kept Secret. New York, NY: IRL Press. ISBN 0-8014-8727-7.

	^ 
"Results, Center on Hunger and Poverty, hunger and poverty statistics for the United States". Retrieved August 29, 2006.

	^ John L. Shover. First Majority, Last Minority: The Transforming of Rural Life in America (1976)

	^ 
"CIA factbook, United States labor force by economic sector". Retrieved February 15, 2007.

	^ R. Douglas Hurt, American Agriculture: A Brief History (2002); John T Schlebecker. Whereby we thrive: A history of American farming, 1607–1972 (1972) (
ISBN 0-8138-0090-0)

	^ a b 
Murray CJ, Kulkarni SC, Michaud C,  et al. (2006). "Eight Americas: investigating mortality disparities across races, counties, and race-counties in the United States". PLOS Med. 3 (9): e260. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030260. PMC 1564165. PMID 16968116. Lay summary – proto (2008).

	^ 
"Health and social class". Retrieved December 13, 2006.

	^ 
"Bad diet and income". Archived from the original on November 29, 2006. Retrieved December 14, 2006.

	^ 
"Socioeconomic status and obesity" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on September 23, 2006. Retrieved December 14, 2006.

	^ Based on Larry Bartels's study Economic Inequality and Political Representation Archived September 15, 2011, at the Wayback Machine, Table 1: Differential Responsiveness of Senators to Constituency Opinion.

	^ 
United States Census Bureau (2002). Voting Registration in the Election of 2000. Current Population Reports. Washington D.C.: United States Government Printing Office.

	^ Sociology: Third Edition by Paul B. Horton and Chester L. Hunt





Further reading[edit]

	Leonard Beeghley; The Structure of Social Stratification in the United States Pearson, 2004
	Dennis Gilbert; The American Class Structure Wadsworth, 2002
	Rhonda Levine; Social Class and Stratification Rowman & Littlefield, 1998
	Paul Fussell Class: A Guide Through the American Status System Simon & Schuster, 1992
	Michael Zweig; What's Class Got To Do With It? Cornell University Press, 2003
	Christopher Beach; Class, Language, and American Film Comedy Cambridge University Press, 2002
	Harold J. Bershady ed; Social Class and Democratic Leadership: Essays in Honor of E. Digby Baltzell 1989
	Daniel Bertaux, and Paul Thompson; Pathways to Social Class: A Qualitative Approach to Social Mobility Clarendon Press, 1997
	Barbara Ehrenreich. Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America (2002), author disguises herself as working class
	David B. Grusky (Editor) Social Stratification: Class, Race, and Gender in Sociological Perspective (2000)
	Alan C. Kerckhoff; Socialization and Social Class 1972, textbook
	Jim Lardner, James Lardner, David A. Smith, editors, Inequality Matters: The Growing Economic Divide In America And Its Poisonous Consequences, WW Norton (January 2006), hardcover, 224 pages, 
ISBN 1-56584-995-7
	Erik Olin Wright. Classe (1997) – a detailed Marxian guide to define working class/middle class etc.
	David Popenoe, Sociology, (ninth edition, Prentice Hall, 1993 
ISBN 0-13-819798-9 ) pb. pp. 232–236,
	Wealth, Income, and Power – wealth distribution in the United States from a Power Structure Research perspective
	Myth: Income mobility makes up for income inequality at the Wayback Machine (archived 2000-10-30) – analysis from Liberal point of view
	Kalra, Paul (1996). The American Class System: Divide and Rule. 
ISBN 0-9647173-5-2.
	Kay Hymowitz / Marriage and Caste in America: Separate and Unequal Families in a Post-Marital Age (2006) 
ISBN 1-56663-709-0
	G. William Domhoff (1967). Who Rules America?, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall
	Lee D. Baker (2004). Life in America: Identity and Everyday Experience, Blackwell Publishing, 
ISBN 1-4051-0564-X


External links[edit]

	United States Census Bureau's official online income statistics forum at the Wayback Machine (archived 2005-06-04)
	Income distribution and income by race, United States Census Bureau 2005 at the Wayback Machine (archived 2007-01-04)
	Household income by educational attainment, United States Census Bureau at the Library of Congress Web Archives (archived 2001-11-18)
	Personal income in 2004, United States Census Bureau at the Library of Congress Web Archives (archived 2001-11-18)
	Median Family Income by Family Size (in 2004 inflation-adjusted dollars) from Census.gov at the Portuguese Web Archive (archived 2009-07-10)
	Median Family Income by Number of Earners in Family (in 2004 inflation-adjusted dollars) from Census.gov at the Wayback Machine (archived 2005-10-31)
	Working Definitions ClassMatters.com
	How Class Works, The New York Times
	America's Disappearing Middle Class: Implications for Public Policy and Politics by Trevor Beltz, May 2012


	
	v
	t
	e


	Social class




	
	Status
	Stratum
	Economic classes




	
	Theories	
	Gilbert model
	Marxian
	Mudsill theory
	New class
	Spoon class theory
	Weberian (three-component)




	Related​ topics	
	Caste
	Chattering classes
	Class conflict
	Class discrimination
	Classicide
	Classless society
	Class society
	Euthenics
	Nouveau riche / Parvenu
	Poverty
	Ranked society
	Snobbery
	Social cleansing
	Social exclusion
	Social mobility
	Social orphan
	Social position
	Social stigma
	Subaltern







	
	By demographic


	
	By status	
	Administrative detainee
	Alien
	illegal immigrant
	refugee


	Citizen
	dual or multiple
	native-born
	naturalized
	second-class


	Convicted
	Migrant worker
	Political prisoner
	Stateless
	Clique
	Adolescent






	By "collar"	
	Blue
	Green
	Grey
	New
	Pink
	White




	By type	
	Ruling	
	Aristocracy
	Hanseaten
	Patrician
	Political
	Royal family




	Intellectual	
	Clergy
	Knowledge worker
	Professor




	Warrior	
	Harii
	Kshatriya
	Yadav
	Nair
	Chhetri
	Cossacks
	Hashashin
	Knight
	Vanniyar
	Samurai
	Cuāuh
	Ocēlōtl
	Spartiate




	Upper	
	Bourgeoisie
	Business magnate
	Elite
	Gentry
	Lord
	Nobility
	Old money
	Overclass
	Robber baron
	Russian oligarch
	Seigneur
	Superclass




	Creative	
	Bohemians




	Middle	
	Lower middle class
	Upper middle class
	Bourgeoisie
	Petite bourgeoisie




	Working	
	Working poor
	Proletariat
	Lumpenproletariat




	Under	
	Ant tribe
	Rat tribe
	Commoner
	Outcast
	Outlaw / Prisoner
	Peasant / Serf
	Plebeian
	Slave
	Untouchable













	
	By country or region


	
	United States	
	
	Affluence
	American Dream
	Conflict
	History
	Mobility




	Classes	
	Upper
	Black
	Donor
	Gentry


	Middle
	Black
	Mexican-American
	Upper Middle


	Underprivileged
	Lower
	Under






	Income	
	Household
	Inequality
	Personal
	Poverty




	Standard of living	
	Education
	Homelessness
	Home-ownership
	Wealth







	Other regions​ or countries	
	Africa
	Cambodia
	China
	Colombia
	Ecuador
	France
	Haiti
	India
	Iran
	Italy
	Nepal
	New Zealand
	Romania
	Sri Lanka
	Tibet
	United Kingdom
	United States




	Historic	
	Ancient Greece
	Ancient Rome
	Aztec
	Ottoman Empire
	Soviet Union
	Pre-industrial East Asia
	Pre-industrial Europe










	
	 Category







	
	v
	t
	e


Demographics of the United States

	Demographic history

	By economic
and social	
	Affluence
	Educational attainment
	Emigration
	Home-ownership
	Household income
	Immigration
	Income inequality
	Language
	LGBT
	Middle classes
	Personal income
	Poverty
	Social class
	Unemployment by state
	Wealth




	By religion	
	Baha'is
	Buddhists
	Christians
	Catholics
	Coptics
	Mormons
	Protestants


	Hindus
	Jains
	Jews
	Muslims
	Ahmadiyyas
	Five Percenters
	Moorish Scientists
	Nation of Islam
	Value Creators


	Neopagans
	Non-religious
	Rastafaris
	Scientologists
	Sikhs
	Zoroastrians




	By continent
and ethnicity	
	Africa	
	African Americans
	African diaspora in the Americas
	Afro-Caribbean / West Indian Americans
	Bahamian Americans
	Haitian Americans
	Jamaican Americans
	Trinidadian and Tobagonian Americans


	Black Hispanic and Latino Americans


	African immigrants to the United States
	Central Africans in the United States
	Southeast Africans in the United States
	Southern Africans in the United States
	West Africans in the United States






	Horn of Africa
	Eritrean Americans
	Ethiopian Americans
	Somali Americans




	North Africans in the United States
	Algerian Americans
	Berber Americans
	Egyptian Americans
	Libyan Americans
	Moroccan Americans
	Tunisian Americans






	Asia	
	Asian Americans
	Asian Hispanic and Latino Americans


	Central Asia
	Afghan Americans
	Pashtun Americans


	Baloch Americans
	Kazakh Americans
	Kyrgyz Americans
	Tajikistani Americans
	Uyghur Americans
	Uzbek Americans


	East Asia
	Chinese Americans
	Hong Kong Americans
	Tibetan Americans
	Taiwanese Americans


	Japanese Americans
	Korean Americans
	Mongolian Americans


	South Asia
	Bangladeshi Americans
	Bhutanese Americans
	Indian Americans
	Telugu Americans


	Maldivian Americans
	Nepalese Americans
	Pakistani Americans
	Sri Lankan Americans
	Tamil Americans




	Southeast Asia
	Burmese Americans
	Cambodian Americans
	Filipino Americans
	Hmong Americans
	Indonesian Americans
	Karen Americans
	Laotian Americans
	Malaysian Americans
	Singaporean Americans
	Thai Americans
	Vietnamese Americans




	Romani Americans


	West Asia
	Arab Americans
	Armenian Americans
	Assyrian Americans
	Azerbaijani Americans
	Emirati Americans
	Georgian Americans
	Iranian Americans
	Iraqi Americans
	Israeli Americans
	Jewish Americans
	Jordanian Americans
	Kurdish Americans
	Kuwaiti Americans
	Lebanese Americans
	Palestinian Americans
	Saudi Arabian Americans
	Syrian Americans
	Turkish Americans
	Yemeni Americans






	Europe	
	White Americans
	Albanian Americans
	Austrian Americans
	Belarusian Americans
	Belgian Americans
	Bosnian Americans
	British Americans
	Cornish Americans
	English Americans
	Manx Americans
	Scottish Americans
	Welsh Americans


	Bulgarian Americans
	Croatian Americans
	Cypriot Americans
	Czech Americans
	Danish Americans
	Dutch Americans
	Estonian Americans
	Finnish Americans
	French Americans
	German Americans
	Greek Americans
	Hungarian Americans
	Icelandic Americans
	Irish Americans
	Italian Americans
	Latvian Americans
	Liechtensteiner Americans
	Lithuanian Americans
	Luxembourgian Americans
	Macedonian Americans
	Maltese Americans
	Moldovan Americans
	Monacan Americans
	Montenegrin Americans
	Norwegian Americans
	Polish Americans
	Portuguese Americans
	Romanian Americans
	Russian Americans
	Sammarinese Americans
	Scandinavian Americans
	Serbian Americans
	Slavic Americans
	Slovak Americans
	Slovenian Americans
	Spanish Americans
	Basque Americans
	Catalan Americans
	Galician Americans


	Swedish Americans
	Swiss Americans
	Ukrainian Americans


	Non-Hispanic whites
	White Hispanic and Latino Americans




	Oceania	
	Pacific Islander Americans
	Chamorro Americans
	Fijian Americans
	French Polynesian Americans
	Marshallese Americans
	Micronesian Americans
	Native Hawaiians
	Palauan Americans
	Samoan Americans
	Tongan Americans


	Americans of Euro Oceanic origin
	Australian Americans
	New Zealand Americans






	North America	
	Native Americans
	Abenaki
	Apache
	Blackfeet
	Cherokee
	Cheyenne
	Chickasaw
	Chippewa
	Choctaw
	Colville
	Comanche
	Cree
	Creek
	Crow
	Houma
	Iroquois
	Cayuga
	Mohawk
	Oneida
	Onondaga
	Seneca
	Tuscarora


	Kiowa
	Lenape
	Lumbee
	Menominee
	Mission Indians
	Cahuilla
	Chemehuevi
	Chumash
	Cupeño
	Diegueño
	Esselen
	Juaneño
	Kitanemuk
	Luiseño
	Miwok
	Patwin
	Pomo
	Salinan
	Serrano
	Suisunes
	Ohlone
	Awaswas
	Chalon
	Chochenyo
	Karkin
	Tamyen


	Tataviam
	Tongva
	Wappo
	Wintun
	Yokuts


	Navajo
	Osage
	Odawa
	Paiute
	Pawnee
	Pima
	Potawatomi
	Pueblo
	Quechan
	Salish
	Seminole
	Shawnee
	Shoshone
	Sioux
	Tohono Oʼodham
	Ute
	Yakama
	Yaqui


	Alaska Natives
	Alaskan Athabaskans
	Aleut
	Alutiiq
	Gwich'in
	Haida
	Iñupiat
	Tsimshian
	Tlingit
	Yupik




	Canadian Americans


	Hispanic and Latino Americans
	Central America
	Belizean Americans
	Costa Rican Americans
	Guatemalan Americans
	Honduran Americans
	Nicaraguan Americans
	Panamanian Americans
	Salvadoran Americans


	Cuban Americans
	Dominican Americans
	Mexican Americans
	Chicanos


	Stateside Puerto Ricans






	South America	
	Argentine Americans
	Bolivian Americans
	Brazilian Americans
	Chilean Americans
	Colombian Americans
	Ecuadorian Americans
	Guyanese Americans
	Paraguayan Americans
	Peruvian Americans
	Surinamese Americans
	Uruguayan Americans
	Venezuelan Americans




	Multiethnic	
	Amerasian
	Melungeon




	
	People of the United States / Americans
	American ancestry
	Native American ancestry
	Maps of American ancestries
	2010 Census
	Race and ethnicity in the Census


	Births of U.S. states and territories by race/ethnicity
	Race and ethnicity in the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
	Racism










	
	v
	t
	e


United States articles

	History	
	By event	
	Pre-Columbian era
	Colonial era
	Thirteen Colonies
	military history
	Founding Fathers
	Continental Congress
	Continental Association


	Lee Resolution
	Declaration of Independence
	American Revolution
	War
	Treaty of Paris


	Articles of Confederation
	Confederation Period


	American frontier
	Drafting and ratification of Constitution
	Bill of Rights


	Federalist Era
	War of 1812
	Territorial evolution
	Mexican–American War
	Civil War
	Reconstruction era
	Indian Wars
	Gilded Age
	Progressive Era
	Women's suffrage
	Civil rights movement 1865–1896 / 1896–1954 / 1954–1968
	Spanish–American War
	Imperialism
	World War I
	Roaring Twenties
	Great Depression
	World War II
	home front


	American Century
	Cold War
	Korean War
	Space Race
	Feminist Movement
	Vietnam War
	Post-Cold War (1991–2008)
	War on Terror
	War in Afghanistan
	Iraq War


	COVID-19 pandemic




	By topic	
	Outline of U.S. history
	Demographic
	Discoveries
	Economic
	debt ceiling


	Inventions
	before 1890
	1890–1945
	1946–1991
	after 1991


	Military
	Postal
	Technological and industrial







	Geography	
	
	Territory
	Contiguous United States
	Continental America
	counties
	federal district
	federal enclaves
	Indian reservations
	insular zones
	minor outlying islands
	populated places
	states


	Earthquakes
	Extreme points
	Islands
	Mountains
	peaks
	ranges
	Appalachian
	Rocky


	National Park Service
	National Parks


	Regions
	East Coast
	West Coast
	Great Plains
	Gulf
	Mid-Atlantic
	Midwestern
	New England
	Pacific
	Central
	Eastern
	Northern
	Northeastern
	Northwestern
	Southern
	Southeastern
	Southwestern
	Western


	Longest rivers
	Arkansas
	Colorado
	Columbia
	Mississippi
	Missouri
	Red (South)
	Rio Grande
	Yukon


	Time
	Water supply and sanitation
	World Heritage Sites







	Politics	
	
	Federal	
	Executive	
	Cabinet
	Civil service
	Executive departments
	Executive Office
	Independent agencies
	Law enforcement
	President of the United States
	Powers


	Public policy




	Legislative	
	House of Representatives
	current members
	Speaker


	Senate
	current members
	President pro tempore
	Vice President






	Judicial	
	District courts
	Courts of appeals
	Supreme Court




	Law	
	Bill of Rights
	civil liberties


	Code of Federal Regulations
	Constitution
	federalism
	preemption
	separation of powers
	civil rights


	Federal Reporter
	United States Code
	United States Reports




	Intelligence	
	Central Intelligence Agency
	Defense Intelligence Agency
	Federal Bureau of Investigation
	National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency
	National Reconnaissance Office
	National Security Agency
	Office of the Director of National Intelligence




	Uniformed	
	Armed Forces
	Army
	Marine Corps
	Navy
	Air Force
	Space Force
	Coast Guard
	National Guard


	NOAA Corps
	Public Health Service Corps







	
	51st state
	political status of Puerto Rico
	District of Columbia statehood movement


	Elections
	Electoral College


	Foreign relations
	Foreign policy


	Hawaiian sovereignty movement
	Ideologies
	anti-Americanism
	exceptionalism
	nationalism


	Local government
	Parties
	Democratic
	Republican
	Third parties


	Red states and blue states
	Purple America


	Scandals
	State government
	governor
	state legislature
	state court


	Imperial Presidency
	Corruption










	Economy	
	
	By sector
	Agriculture
	Banking
	Communications
	Companies
	Energy
	Insurance
	Manufacturing
	Mining
	Science and technology
	Tourism
	Trade
	Transportation
	by state


	Currency
	Exports
	Federal budget
	Federal Reserve System
	Financial position
	Labor unions
	Public debt
	Social welfare programs
	Taxation
	Unemployment
	Wall Street







	Society	
	
	Culture	
	Americana
	Architecture
	Cinema
	Crime
	Cuisine
	Dance
	Demography
	Economic issues
	affluence
	eviction
	home-ownership
	household income
	income inequality
	labor unions
	middle class
	personal income
	poverty
	standard of living
	wealth


	Education
	attainment


	Family structure
	Fashion
	Flag
	Folklore
	Great American Novel
	Health
	health care
	health insurance


	Holidays
	Homelessness
	Human rights
	Languages
	American English
	Indigenous languages
	ASL
	Black American Sign Language


	HSL
	Plains Sign Talk
	Arabic
	Chinese
	French
	German
	Italian
	Russian
	Spanish


	Literature
	Media
	Journalism
	Internet
	Newspapers
	Radio
	Television


	Music
	Names
	National symbols
	Columbia
	Statue of Liberty
	Uncle Sam


	People
	Philosophy
	Political ideologies
	Public holidays
	Race
	Religion
	Sexuality / Adolescent Sexuality
	Social class
	Society
	Sports
	Theater
	Transportation
	Video games
	Visual art




	Social class	
	Affluence
	American Dream
	Educational attainment
	Homelessness
	Home-ownership
	Household income
	Income inequality
	Middle class
	Personal income
	Poverty
	Professional and working class conflict
	Standard of living




	Issues	
	Ages of consent
	Capital punishment
	Crime
	incarceration


	Criticism of government
	Discrimination
	affirmative action
	antisemitism
	hair texture
	intersex rights
	Islamophobia
	LGBT rights
	racism
	same-sex marriage


	Drug policy
	Energy policy
	Environmental movement
	Gun politics
	Health care
	abortion
	health insurance
	hunger
	obesity
	smoking


	Human rights
	Immigration
	illegal


	International rankings
	National security
	Mass surveillance
	Terrorism


	Separation of church and state










		Outline
	
Index



	Category
	Portal













Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Social_class_in_the_United_States&oldid=1002493302"


		Categories: 	Social class in the United States


Hidden categories: 	Webarchive template wayback links
	Wikipedia articles in need of updating from February 2015
	All Wikipedia articles in need of updating
	Use mdy dates from April 2017
	Articles with short description
	Short description with empty Wikidata description
	All articles with unsourced statements
	Articles with unsourced statements from January 2010
	Articles with unsourced statements from August 2007
	Webarchive template other archives




	




	





	Navigation menu

	
		

	
		Personal tools
	

	
			Not logged in
	Talk
	Contributions
	Create account
	Log in


		
	



		
			

	
		Namespaces
	

	
			Article
	Talk


		
	



			

	
	
		Variants
	

	
		

		
	



		

		
			

	
		Views
	

	
			Read
	Edit
	View history


		
	



			

	
	
		More
	

	
		

		
	



			
	
		Search
	

	
		
			
			
			
			
		

	




		

	

	

	
		
	

	

	
		Navigation
	

	
			Main page
	Contents
	Current events
	Random article
	About Wikipedia
	Contact us
	Donate


		
	



	

	
		Contribute
	

	
			Help
	Learn to edit
	Community portal
	Recent changes
	Upload file


		
	




	
		Tools
	

	
			What links here
	Related changes
	Upload file
	Special pages
	Permanent link
	Page information
	Cite this page
	Wikidata item


		
	




	
		Print/export
	

	
			Download as PDF
	Printable version


		
	



	

	
		Languages
	

	
		

		Add links

	









		 This page was last edited on 24 January 2021, at 18:31 (UTC).
	Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License;
additional terms may apply.  By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



		Privacy policy
	About Wikipedia
	Disclaimers
	Contact Wikipedia
	Mobile view
	Developers
	Statistics
	Cookie statement