id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_obfq2qoglbg3vgqymymdjfnc7e	MELISSA SEYMOUR FAHMY	ON THE SUPPOSED MORAL HARM OF SELECTING FOR DEAFNESS	2011.0	9	.pdf	application/pdf	7307	447	60	for the supposed moral harm of selecting for deafness and concludes that these couples may seek to utilize genetic counseling services and reproductive technologies to help them intentionally reproduce a deaf child rather than leave the Davis, the decision to select for deafness violates a child's moral objection to the decision to select in favor of deafness, it does appear to be applicable to the parental The implications of the right to an open future argument for parents of (existing) deaf children merit mentioning insofar as there is a potential to think that An alternative approach to accounting for the supposed moral harm of selecting for deafness is open to deaf case are selecting for a child who shares a condition On the Supposed Moral Harm of Selecting for Deafness 135 On the Supposed Moral Harm of Selecting for Deafness 135 On the Supposed Moral Harm of Selecting for Deafness 135	./cache/work_obfq2qoglbg3vgqymymdjfnc7e.pdf	./txt/work_obfq2qoglbg3vgqymymdjfnc7e.txt