A supplement to a late treatise, called An essay for the discovery of some new geometrical problems concerning angular sections, resolving what was there problematically proposed; and with some rectification made in the former essay, showing an easie method truly geometrical, without any conick section, or cubick æquation, to sect any angle or arch of a circle into 3. 5. 7. or any other uneven number of equal parts. By G. K. Keith, George, 1639?-1716. 1697 Approx. 13 KB of XML-encoded text transcribed from 4 1-bit group-IV TIFF page images. Text Creation Partnership, Ann Arbor, MI ; Oxford (UK) : 2006-06 (EEBO-TCP Phase 1). A47183 Wing K216A ESTC R216625 99828350 99828350 32777 This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal . The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission. Early English books online. (EEBO-TCP ; phase 1, no. A47183) Transcribed from: (Early English Books Online ; image set 32777) Images scanned from microfilm: (Early English books, 1641-1700 ; 1951:14) A supplement to a late treatise, called An essay for the discovery of some new geometrical problems concerning angular sections, resolving what was there problematically proposed; and with some rectification made in the former essay, showing an easie method truly geometrical, without any conick section, or cubick æquation, to sect any angle or arch of a circle into 3. 5. 7. or any other uneven number of equal parts. By G. K. Keith, George, 1639?-1716. 7, [1] p. printed for the author, and are to be had at the Three Pigeons over against the Exchange, and at his House in Pudding-lane, at the sign of the Golden Ball, where he teacheth the mathematical arts, [London : [1697?]] G.K. = George Keith. Caption title. Imprint from colophon; publication date conjectured by Wing. Reproduction of the original in the British Library. Created by converting TCP files to TEI P5 using tcp2tei.xsl, TEI @ Oxford. Re-processed by University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Northwestern, with changes to facilitate morpho-syntactic tagging. Gap elements of known extent have been transformed into placeholder characters or elements to simplify the filling in of gaps by user contributors. EEBO-TCP is a partnership between the Universities of Michigan and Oxford and the publisher ProQuest to create accurately transcribed and encoded texts based on the image sets published by ProQuest via their Early English Books Online (EEBO) database (http://eebo.chadwyck.com). The general aim of EEBO-TCP is to encode one copy (usually the first edition) of every monographic English-language title published between 1473 and 1700 available in EEBO. EEBO-TCP aimed to produce large quantities of textual data within the usual project restraints of time and funding, and therefore chose to create diplomatic transcriptions (as opposed to critical editions) with light-touch, mainly structural encoding based on the Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org). The EEBO-TCP project was divided into two phases. The 25,363 texts created during Phase 1 of the project have been released into the public domain as of 1 January 2015. Anyone can now take and use these texts for their own purposes, but we respectfully request that due credit and attribution is given to their original source. Users should be aware of the process of creating the TCP texts, and therefore of any assumptions that can be made about the data. Text selection was based on the New Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature (NCBEL). If an author (or for an anonymous work, the title) appears in NCBEL, then their works are eligible for inclusion. Selection was intended to range over a wide variety of subject areas, to reflect the true nature of the print record of the period. In general, first editions of a works in English were prioritized, although there are a number of works in other languages, notably Latin and Welsh, included and sometimes a second or later edition of a work was chosen if there was a compelling reason to do so. Image sets were sent to external keying companies for transcription and basic encoding. Quality assurance was then carried out by editorial teams in Oxford and Michigan. 5% (or 5 pages, whichever is the greater) of each text was proofread for accuracy and those which did not meet QA standards were returned to the keyers to be redone. After proofreading, the encoding was enhanced and/or corrected and characters marked as illegible were corrected where possible up to a limit of 100 instances per text. Any remaining illegibles were encoded as s. Understanding these processes should make clear that, while the overall quality of TCP data is very good, some errors will remain and some readable characters will be marked as illegible. Users should bear in mind that in all likelihood such instances will never have been looked at by a TCP editor. The texts were encoded and linked to page images in accordance with level 4 of the TEI in Libraries guidelines. Copies of the texts have been issued variously as SGML (TCP schema; ASCII text with mnemonic sdata character entities); displayable XML (TCP schema; characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or text strings within braces); or lossless XML (TEI P5, characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or TEI g elements). Keying and markup guidelines are available at the Text Creation Partnership web site . eng Geometry -- Early works to 1800. 2005-05 TCP Assigned for keying and markup 2005-08 SPi Global Keyed and coded from ProQuest page images 2006-01 Judith Siefring Sampled and proofread 2006-01 Judith Siefring Text and markup reviewed and edited 2006-04 pfs Batch review (QC) and XML conversion A SUPPLEMENT TO A Late TREATISE , CALLED An Essay for the Discovery of some New Geometrical Problems , Concerning Angular Sections , resolving what was there Problematically proposed ; and with some Rectification made in the former Essay , showing an easie method truly Geometrical , without any Conick Section , or Cubick Aequation , to sect any Angle or Arch of a Circle into 3.5.7 . or any other Uneven Number of equal parts . By G.K. WHereas it was supposed in the former Proposal , that a straight Line could be drawn through the extream Points of three or more Concentrick Arches at both ends ( the Arches beginning or ending upon a straight Line ●oming from the Center of those Concentrick Arches ) having equal Cords , though not equal Arches . Upon further consideration , it is found , that however seemingly such a Line may appear to be straight in many cases , as when the Radius is short , or the Angle very acute , yet in no case is such a Line mathematically straight , but is a regular Curve , and can be as regularly drawn , and by as true Geometrical Art , as any Parabola , or other Conick Section can , and with greater facility and readiness , and which any Tiro who understands nothing of Conick Sections , and Cubick Equations may do . The way of drawing the said Curve is this : Let a short cross-Rule be set at right Angles with another longer Rule , and let the length of the cross Rule be at pleasure 2 or 3 Inches , or more , as 6 or 7 , as ye have a mind to make the length of the Cord of each part of the Section of your Angle , which as in the following Figure let be 3 Inches , and let the just half of the cross-Rule be on the left side of the long Rule , and let a small Brass or Steel-Pin be fixed on the right end of the said cross Rule , that as the Rule is moved , may make an Impression on the Paper , as the point of the Compass doth in drawing a Circle . The length of the longer Rule is to be as occasion requireth , as double or triple the length of the other . Having thus prepared your two Rules , the one cutting the other at right Angles , and the cross-Rule fixed to it , ( though it may be made also moveable on it ) suppose the Angle given to be trisected is BAC , measured by the arch BMC . in order to draw the curve Line with one draught of the Hand , set the left end of the cross-Rule , on the point B , and from B let it run or slide along the line BA , and as it runs along the said Line , let the left side of the long Rule still run through the Center , or vertical point A , which is most easily done ; and let it run or slide along from B towards A , until the other end of the cross-Rule reach at least to the line AC , or further as one pleaseth , and the Brass Pin on the other end of the cross Rule shall describe the regular curve FIG Having thus drawn the curve Line , at the distance of one half of the cross Rule draw the straight Line DE paralel to AC . and where the Curve Line cuts the straight line DE as at I , a Line drawn from the center A to I , shall by true Geometry , trisect the given angle BAC . The Demonstration . Seeing it is the property of these two Rules crossing each other at right Angles , where ever the two ends of the cross Rule terminates , to make an Isosceles triangle , making always two right angle triangles , whose Bases are equal , and the Perpendicular common to both , therefore by the 4. 1. el. Eucl. the Hypotenusals are equal . Therefore with Radius AI describing the arch HLIS , draw the Cord HI . and from I let fall a perpendicular on the line AC . as IK , making HI = LI = IK , therefore the arches of those equal Sines are equal , as HL = LI = IS . q.e.d. The same or any other Angle obtruse or acute may be trisected into 3 equal parts , without the curve Line , or any part of it , by finding the point I , which can be found without the curve line by letting the cross Rule slide or run along the line AB , ( while the left side of the long Rule still runneth through the center A ) either upwards or downwards , until the right side of the cross Rule touch the straight line DE which shall be at I. And thus without any need of noticing or regarding the Curve Line , the Point 1 is found , where the two straight lines HI and DE meet together : And as thus any Angle may be trisected without drawing any Curve Line , so it may easily and truly be done without either Scale or Compass , other than what the two cross Rules are , as any Artist may easily perceive . If any object against this Method , as Mechanical , and not Mathematical and truly Geometrical , because performed by an Instrument , I shall refer them to two great Geometricians for its Vindication , to wit , Des Cartes in his second Book of Geometry , and Franciscus a Schoten in his Commentary on him , argum . lib. 2. both which do prove that what is performed by Instruments Geometrically made , is Geometrical , otherwise the plainest Geometry must be rejected , because its Figures are drawn by Rule and Compass , both which are Instruments , and not only Parabolas , and other Conick Sections which are Curves , but divers other Curves , yea , all such that can be drawn by Art , with the help of Instruments , such as they have devised , they contend to be truly Geometrical ; and both of them in their Geometrical Treatises , use divers Instruments for describing Curves Geometrically much more difficult to be made , and with more difficulty to be used , than what is here proposed of two simple Rules , cutting one another at right Angles . And seeing it hath no dependance on Solids , or Algebra Equations , and may be done without any Curve Line , as is above showed , and whose demonstration wholly depends on a few easie Propositions of the first Book of Euclid , I see not why it may not be called Plain Geometry : And as the word Mechanical is used to signifie a thing not Mathematically exact , but coming near to it by Approximation , in this sense it is not Mechanical , but Mathematical , and purely Geometrical , being grounded on as good demonstration , as any Propositions in Euclid , and being but a Corrolary from some of them . The next thing to be shown is the Quinquisection , where to make one Figure serve to both , I make the Cross Rule only one Inch and one 4th part from the middle line AM , setting off on both sides one half of the length of the cross Rule , draw the paralel Lines ad and be , then let the cross Rule side along the line AB , as in the Trisection , while the left side of the long Rule slides through the center A , the other end of the cross Rule shall describe a Curve , a part of which shall be g h , that may be continued at pleasure . Again , setting the right end of the cross Rule one the Point d , let it slide or move along the Line da , ( while the left side of the long Rule runneth through the center A , ) the left end of the cross Rule shall describe a part of another Curve , meeting at h the other Curve . And having found the point h with radius A h describe the Arch v h z x y N which shall give v h = one fifth of the whole Arch , as is evident from the foregoing demonstration . The Quinquisection also may be made without any Curve , if two long Rules be jointed together like a Sector , and each have a moveable cross Rule to move on them at right Angles , with the long Rules . For let the center of the two long Rules be fixed on the center A , and let the 2 cross Rules be moved together from B and d , until ( the left end of the one still touching the right end of the other ) the right end of the Cross nearest to the Line a d touch upon some Point of it as at W , the Point at W shall give the Quinquisection as above . And thus a true Geometrical Line of Cords may be made by any Tiro , without any Conick Section , or Algebra Equation , and without any Table of Natural Sines or Arithmetical Operation ; for whereas Euclid ( 11.4 . ) hath taught how to find the Cord of 36 degr . and also it is found by Quinquisecting the half Circle , as is above shewed , it remains only to trisect the Arch of 120 degr . which giveth the Cord of 40 , and 36 taken from 40 , leaveth 4 degr . which bisected gives 2 , and that bisected giveth 1 , which is the one 360th part of the Circle , and one 90th of the Quadrant ; and this is more methodical than to teach a beginner to make his Line of Cords , for projecting of Angles , by sending him to Conick Sections , and Algebra Equations or the Table of Natural Sines , which he is not capable at his entry , nor after he has made some good progress to understand ( it being to teach ignotum per ignotius an unknown thing by a more unknown ) quite contrary to all good method of true Science , such as Geometry is . The method of the Quinquisection here delivered , sufficiently showeth without example , any other Section desired . The Corrolaries mentioned in the former Treatise , with the Rectification here made , are all valid , some of the chief of them I shall here mention . 1. One great Use is to teach a beginner how to make a true Line of Cords , as is above showed , and how to divide a Circle into any parts required . 2. Another great use Descartes showeth in his third Book of Geometry , for the resolving any such Equation in Algebra as z 3 = + p zq , where the Root z is an unknown quantity , and can be found by the Trisection of an Angle . 3. A third great use is to give some New Promblems in Practical Geometry , one whereof I shall here show . Let a straight Line A F be given , ( see the second Figure ) and it is required on the point A to erect an Isosceles ABC , whose side BC produced , shall terminate on a limited point D , under the given straight line AF. The construction is thus , draw a straight Line from D to A , as D A , next make the right Angle FAE . Divide the angle EAD into three equal parts , and with radius AD describe the Semicircle GFE . From C to B set off GB = ED. Then draw the line AB , and from B draw the line BCD , which shall form the Isosceles triangle ABC , whose side BC being produced , shall terminate on D. q.e.f. the use of this is obvious in Architecture . 4. A fourth great use is to give us some New Problems in Geography and Navigation . Example . There are four places A. B C. D so situated . A is distant from D 100 Leagues , and beareth South-Easterly from it 70 degr . B is distant from A 100 Leagues South-Westerly . C is distant from B 100 Leagues North-Westerly C and A are in the same Latitude and so that these three places B. C. D lie in a straight Line one from another . Q. What is the distance betwixt these two places , B and D , and the Course on the Rhumb Line betwixt A and B , and the distance betwixt A and C. The Resolution . Divide the angle EAD into three equal parts , and make CAB = one third part of EAD , and draw the line BAD . Thus the four places A. B. C. D shall be duly situated , and an Isosceles Triangle shall be formed ABD , whose side AB = AD = 100 Leagues , and the angle BAD = 86 degr . 40. consequently by plain Trigonometry , the angle of the course GAB being found , which is 23 degr . 30 min. the angle ABD , its double is 46 degr . 40 = ADB , by the Rule of Opposits . As the Sine of 46 d. 40 to AD 100 Leagues , so the Sine of 86. 40 Log. 9.861757 2.000000 9.999265 11.999265 9.861757 to BD 137. ● . fere 2.137508 From which substracting BC 100 Leagues , there remaineth CD 37. ● . as was required . A Fifth great use of the Trisection , and other Sections is , having the Ratio of any 2 Angles given in any plain . Triangle , to find the quantity of them , if the quantity of the 3d Angle be given , without any regard to their sides . What other uses these Angular Sections may have , is left to the search of Industrious Artists . London , Printed for the Author , and are to be had at the Three Pigeons over against the Exchange , and at his House in Pudding-lane , at the Sign of the Golden Ball , where he Teacheth the Mathematical Arts.