Transnatural philosophy, or, Metaphysicks demonstrating the essences and operations of all beings whatever ... and shewing the perfect conformity of Christian faith to right reason, and the unreasonableness of atheists ... and other sectaries : with an appendix giving a rational explication of the mystery of the most B. Trinity / by J.S. Sergeant, John, 1622-1707. 1700 Approx. 1025 KB of XML-encoded text transcribed from 298 1-bit group-IV TIFF page images. Text Creation Partnership, Ann Arbor, MI ; Oxford (UK) : 2004-08 (EEBO-TCP Phase 1). A59250 Wing S2598 ESTC R41713 31355814 ocm 31355814 110692 This keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above is co-owned by the institutions providing financial support to the Early English Books Online Text Creation Partnership. This Phase I text is available for reuse, according to the terms of Creative Commons 0 1.0 Universal . The text can be copied, modified, distributed and performed, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission. Early English books online. (EEBO-TCP ; phase 1, no. A59250) Transcribed from: (Early English Books Online ; image set 110692) Images scanned from microfilm: (Early English books, 1641-1700 ; 1752:23) Transnatural philosophy, or, Metaphysicks demonstrating the essences and operations of all beings whatever ... and shewing the perfect conformity of Christian faith to right reason, and the unreasonableness of atheists ... and other sectaries : with an appendix giving a rational explication of the mystery of the most B. Trinity / by J.S. Sergeant, John, 1622-1707. [80], 484, [1] p. Printed by the Author, Sold by D. Brown ..., Abel Roper ..., and Tho. Metcalf ..., London : 1700. Contains marginal notes. Errata: p. [1] at end. Imperfect: tightly bound, and with print show-through and loss of text. Reproduction of original in the Harvard University Library. Created by converting TCP files to TEI P5 using tcp2tei.xsl, TEI @ Oxford. Re-processed by University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Northwestern, with changes to facilitate morpho-syntactic tagging. Gap elements of known extent have been transformed into placeholder characters or elements to simplify the filling in of gaps by user contributors. EEBO-TCP is a partnership between the Universities of Michigan and Oxford and the publisher ProQuest to create accurately transcribed and encoded texts based on the image sets published by ProQuest via their Early English Books Online (EEBO) database (http://eebo.chadwyck.com). The general aim of EEBO-TCP is to encode one copy (usually the first edition) of every monographic English-language title published between 1473 and 1700 available in EEBO. EEBO-TCP aimed to produce large quantities of textual data within the usual project restraints of time and funding, and therefore chose to create diplomatic transcriptions (as opposed to critical editions) with light-touch, mainly structural encoding based on the Text Encoding Initiative (http://www.tei-c.org). The EEBO-TCP project was divided into two phases. The 25,363 texts created during Phase 1 of the project have been released into the public domain as of 1 January 2015. Anyone can now take and use these texts for their own purposes, but we respectfully request that due credit and attribution is given to their original source. Users should be aware of the process of creating the TCP texts, and therefore of any assumptions that can be made about the data. Text selection was based on the New Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature (NCBEL). If an author (or for an anonymous work, the title) appears in NCBEL, then their works are eligible for inclusion. Selection was intended to range over a wide variety of subject areas, to reflect the true nature of the print record of the period. In general, first editions of a works in English were prioritized, although there are a number of works in other languages, notably Latin and Welsh, included and sometimes a second or later edition of a work was chosen if there was a compelling reason to do so. Image sets were sent to external keying companies for transcription and basic encoding. Quality assurance was then carried out by editorial teams in Oxford and Michigan. 5% (or 5 pages, whichever is the greater) of each text was proofread for accuracy and those which did not meet QA standards were returned to the keyers to be redone. After proofreading, the encoding was enhanced and/or corrected and characters marked as illegible were corrected where possible up to a limit of 100 instances per text. Any remaining illegibles were encoded as s. Understanding these processes should make clear that, while the overall quality of TCP data is very good, some errors will remain and some readable characters will be marked as illegible. Users should bear in mind that in all likelihood such instances will never have been looked at by a TCP editor. The texts were encoded and linked to page images in accordance with level 4 of the TEI in Libraries guidelines. Copies of the texts have been issued variously as SGML (TCP schema; ASCII text with mnemonic sdata character entities); displayable XML (TCP schema; characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or text strings within braces); or lossless XML (TEI P5, characters represented either as UTF-8 Unicode or TEI g elements). Keying and markup guidelines are available at the Text Creation Partnership web site . eng Metaphysics -- Early works to 1800. 2004-04 TCP Assigned for keying and markup 2004-04 Apex CoVantage Keyed and coded from ProQuest page images 2004-05 Emma (Leeson) Huber Sampled and proofread 2004-05 Emma (Leeson) Huber Text and markup reviewed and edited 2004-07 pfs Batch review (QC) and XML conversion Transnatural Philosophy , OR METAPHYSICKS : Demonstrating the Essences and Operations of all BEINGS whatever , which gives the Principles to all other Sciences . AND Shewing the Perfect Conformity of Christian Faith to Right Reason , and the Unreasonableness of Atheists , Deists , Anti-trinitarians , and other Sectaries . With an Appendix , Giving a Rational Explication of the Mystery of the most B. TRINITY . By I. S. LONDON : Printed by the Author , Sold by D. Brown at the Swan and Bible without Temple-Bar , Abel Roper at the Black Boy , Fleet street , and Tho. Metcalf in Drury-Lane , 1700. To the Right Honourable JAMES , Lord Drummond . MY LORD , DID I think that the Present I here make Your Lordship needed any Man's Patronage to set it off , I should , instead of doing You an Honour , disparage Your good Judgment by such an Address . TRUTH is of Another Kind of Mettal than that Rich Oar which Avaricious Worldlings dig out of the Bowels of the Earth . Her Worth is wholly Intrinsick ; nor can she owe any part of Her Valuableness to the Face of a Heroe , or a Caesar , stampt upon her to make her more Current and Authentick ; and it would argue she wanted Worth , should she beg it . 'T is her Prerogative never to go out of her self : Nor does this Restrain or Imprison , but Enlarge her . The whole Vast Extent of BEING is her Ordinary Purlew , and within the Precincts of her far-stretcht Jurisdiction . Tho' her Steps are Steady and Wary , yet she ranges over All Nature . Her Unconsined Progress takes it's Rise , and starts from Principles : Sciences are her Stages ; whence she makes Excursions into Endless and Numberless Conclusions . Nor does she content her self , much less affect , to walk on even Ground : The Paths she treads are all up-hill , and she knows no Resting-place in her long Ascending Journey , till she settles her self in the Clear Contemplation of the FIRST BEING . These Considerations will make it seem very Improper for a Man who professes to regard nothing but the Promoting of TRUTH , to Preface his Book with a Dedicatory ; which , in the Common Opinion of the World , makes a Show of courting a Patronage , I do once more assure Your Lordship this was not my Aim : For no Man can patronize Errour , and Truth needs no Man's good Word or Authority to abet her . Not all the Power of Alexanders , or Caesars , can make a Bad Proof conclude , nor hinder the Consequence of a True Demonstration . Arguments grounded on Evident Principles are of such a Stiff and Sullen Nature , that they can neither how out of Respect , nor fawn out of Complement , nor shake out of Awe or Fear . Since then Applications of this Nature can no Ways advantage my Cause ; what Excuse can I make to the World why I am so Inconsistent with my Profession ; or , why I would needs do such a needless thing as to Particularize to Your self what I had intended for the Common Good of all my Learned Readers ? 'T is Natural , my Lord , for us all , when we apprehend some sinister Imputation , to lay the Blame on others ; and 't is Honest too , when those Others are really the Cause or Occasion of our incurring that Censure . Pardon me then , my Lord , if , to save my self Harmless , I lay the Good Fault at Your door ; and openly declare , that 't is none but Your self who has made me Guilty of this odd Singularity . Had there been nothing in Your Lordship above the Common , the Common should have taken my Book among them without any Restriction . Had there been no Particular Qualification in Your Lordship , which Distinguisht and Signaliz'd You ; my Indifferency had yet remain'd Undetermin'd . This Specialty in Your Lordship , if I can with Truth make out , and prove to the World , and ( under Favour ) to Your own face too , and that 't is of such a Nature as became Me to take Notice of it ; my Credit is acquitted , and Your Lordship must answer for it . I believe Your Lordship is not aware Your self what this Distinctive Mark is , which could oblige a Man in my Station to single You out thus from Your Peers . I will take leave then to make my Approaches to the telling the World what it is , by acquainting them first what it is not . Were my Talent Heraldry , I would then blazon in the best colours the Antiquity of ▪ Your Noble Family ; how it came first into Scotland with St. Margaret the then Queen . I would lay open the Royal Alliances of it by the Marriage of the Lady Annabel Drummond with Robert the Third , King of Scots ; how from Her , by the Mother's Side , descended the Family of the STUARTS ; who , in a long Succession , Raign'd in Scotland , and afterwards in England too . By which means some of the Royal Blood of those Great Monarchs was deriv'd from that of the DRUMMONDS ; and , by consequence , is Ally'd to that which circulates now in Your Lordship's Veins . Were I skill'd in such matters , I could with Truth declare how far your Lordship outstript all your Equalls in those Exercises in which Noble Gentlemen use to be train'd up ; to that Degree of Skill and Vigour , that , whereas You came thither as a Learner , You arriv'd , in a short time , to the pitch of a Master . I could add , were my Profession Souldiery , what Bravoure Your Lordship shew'd in War , even in the Bud of your Youth ; and how You durst even then look Danger in the Face with an Undaunted Courage . I could recount your Travells thro' the most polite Nations of Europe , culling out of each all that 's Commendable , and conduces to accomplish a Personage of your Rank ; and leaving behind you whatever was Unworthy and Misbecoming . I could , out of a fair Experience , dilate upon your Noble and Civil Deportment ; which claims at once a High Respect , and wins the Love of all that Converse with you , & Know You : How the native Sweetness of your Genius secures you from having any Enemies , and the Greatness of your Mind from fearing them . Lastly , how your Friendly Affability , and Unpretended Courtesy , is neither deprest by mean Condescensions ; nor rais'd above its just Level by the least Disrespectful Height : Which make up a Mixture so Charming , that 't is impossible to know you , and not pay you the double Duties of Esteem and Love. All these are very great Embellishments to your High Extraction , and make a great Esclat in the Eye of the Generality of well-bred Persons . But , what are all these to Mee , whose sole Addiction is to pursue Truth , and to bend the whole Intention of my Mind to promote that Best , and , in comparison , only valuable End , Tho' the Lustre of these do burnish Honour , and is so Conspicuous and Bright in you , that it casts a shadow on others of your Quality and Age ; yet these were not my Chief Motive why I give this Book a particular Reference to your Lordship . No , my Ld. there is another piece of your Character left yet untoucht , which , in my Esteem , excells all these ; which is , that you are a Hearty and Sincere Lover of Truth . 'T is This , 't is This , my Ld. which gives you a just Title and Appropriation to this Present of mine : 'T is This , that can best satisfy the World ( as it does mee ) that your Thoughts are Truly Great , and not detain'd in Insignificant Trifles , as too many of your Rank are ; nor , consequently , are your Affections plac'd on Low and Contemptible Objects . 'T is This that double-guilds Your other Heroical Qualities , and sets you on the Highest Pinnacle of Honour . There is nothing which more shocks a true-bred Gentleman , than a Ly , tho' it be but in puntilio's of ordinary Conversation . But how exceedingly does a Hearty Lover of Truth refine upon this Common Genius of a Man of Honour . Such a Person bids Defiance to the whole Tribe of Errours , which are Lies in their several wayes . A Falshood in Natural Philosophy gives the Ly to Nature . A Falshood or Paralogism in Logick gives the Ly ▪ to Human Reason ▪ which is the true Nature of all Mankind . A Falshood in Metaphysicks gives the Ly to the whole Nature of Being ; that is , to the whole Creation ▪ and to the First Being , who by his Flat Establisht those Natures . You have not yet , my Ld. taken the Full Dimensions of the Grandeur , to which this High Title , [ A Lover of Truth ] has rais'd you . You may please to reflect that this Mistress whom You affect and court , is very neerly Ally'd to Heaven by the Father's side ; and if You espouse her , ( for You may be sure of her chast Consent , if You sincerely affect her ) You dignity and ennoble your Extraction by a Relation transcendently above what Sublunary Marriages could have given it . 'T is then , to one of those Greatest of Men , or rather one of those Paragons of Mankind , that is , to a Sincere Lover of TRUTH , I dedicate my Book . I doubt not but I might have found diverse of those whom the Populace of Scribblers call Patrons or Mecoenasses , who , out of a vain Consideration ●f being Prais'd in Print , would have gratefully accepted it ; had I been willing out of a Mercenary Humour , to prostitute TRUTH to Unqualify'd Persons . But how would it have sham'd my Choice , and brought my Prudence and Sincerity into Question , to make a Present of Pearls to those whose Thoughts are digging in the Dunghil of Worldly Riches ; and value the Barly-corns of their Opulent Estates , above the best Ornament of their Mind , Knowledge . Such Gifts to those Little-Great Men had been as Improper as to present an Atheist with a Prayer-book , who would out of Exteriour Civility , or some other Respect , seem to accept it kindly ; but afterward burn the Book and laugh at the Writer . Yet , all this while , I do not pretend to lay any Obligation at all on your Lordship by this Dedication ; for , had this Book been publish'd without it , You would presently have made it your own by Perusing it . To do which intelligently both your own Natural Genius , and your running thorow the Course of your Studies , in Learned Company , with such Applause , has more effectually enabled You , than it would some of our old School ▪ term-Doctors . Such Maturity of Judgment in such Youthful and Green Years . would easily enable your Vigorous Understanding to take in and digest the most Elevated Conceptions . You see then , my Lord , I only give you what I could not keep from you ; and Forced Kindnesses deserve no Thanks ; tho' I have some Title to your Pardon , because it was Your own Worth that layd this Force upon me . I had , I say , just reason to apprehend Your Lordship would have made this Book your own when you had once got it into your hands , seeing how sedulously You made a strict Search for every Trifle I had written ; and never desisted till you had found them ●ll , and Purchast them at a dear rate : To do which , nothing but the Love of Truth could move You ; since there was neither in them any Affectation of Rhetorick , nor Melodious Gingle of Words , nor the Diverting Conceits of Romances ; with which those Gentlemen , who dwell in the Middle-story , do so contentedly entertain and please their Fancies . And , if Your Lordship was so intently inquisitive after those Pieces of mine which were less Valuable , I had all the reason in the World to think You would not let my Metaphysicks scape your Perusal : Which , if I may be allow'd to be a Competent Judge of my own Productions , is worth them all . But , I do not altogether blame Your Lordship for your Over-value of my poor Labours , because You have it partly Ex Traduce . 'T is Hereditary to Your Lordship to have too good an Opinion of my Writings . Your Lordship 's Noble Father , who is justly accounted the most Universal Scholler of your Nation , did formerly , tho' perfectly unknown to me , give so High and Undeserved a Character of them , as would make a Man , tho' but indifferently Modest , Blush ; and tempt me to admit some thoughts of vain Self complaisance , had I not been provided before hand with an Antidote ; which is , a most clear Demonstration , in the Cloze of my Metaphysicks , that all the Good we have , even to the least tittle , does entirely spring from the Inexhausted Bounty of the World 's Great Governour , who works every thing in us , and by us : And , why may not this be a second Excuse to the World for making your Lordship this Present , upon the Score of Gratitude ; since the Greatest Honour I can by this Address confer on your Lordship , is but a poor Requital of what your Lordships Noble Father was pleas'd to bestow on me . I shall add one word more , which , tho' it may be some Comfort , and an especial Honour to Your Lordship , yet it is a very great Trouble to me : Which is , that those High and most Due Encomiums I give Your Lordship as a Zealous & Unprecedented Lover of Truth , ( tho this be , in reality , one of the Highest Commendations Rational Nature is Capable of ) will not yet draw upon you the least Envy from any . No , my Lord , never fear it ; let your Pretensions to that Title be never so High , You will have but Few Rivals and Competitours . This Darling of Heaven [ TRUTH ] tho' the most Generous & Universal Benefactress to Mankind , is in such Disreput● with the Generality of our Great Ones , except some Few ( whom I do as highly Honour for their True Worth and Rarity , as I contomn the rest ) that they fancy they should stoop themselves below their Dignity if they mali● ▪ Her the least part of their Concern And Knowledge , tho' imploy'd in Defence of the most Fundamental Article of Christianity , is so Unpalatable to their Depraved Tast , that it becomes Nauseous . To talk to such Men of Establishing any Truth , or Explicating Faith , by Rational Principles , sounds to them like Gibberish . They look upon Manly Reason as a kind of Madness , as least as Foppish ▪ and so strangely are their Brains turn'd , that they judge those Discourses which are Solid and go to the bottom , to be Aiery & Superficial . Not considering how this slight Opinion they have taken of TRUTH , leaves them wholly to the Conduct of Fancy , makes their Life Uneven , and their Devotion Bigottish and Fanatical . I am confident that Your Lordship's Discerning Judgment will observe that this Book I send You , contains in it a Cure for all those Distempers , if the Stomachs of the Patients do not turn at the Medecine . You will find here multitudes both of Clear and Well-built Truths ; & , that they are the Genuin Off-spring of Evident Principles : Nor only this ; but You will discover , in my Second Book , the ly True and Firm Grounds of Solid Piety and Devotion . That they may beget and improve in Your Lordship's Noble Soul those Dispositions that will carry You steadily to Eternal Happiness , shall be the Fervent and Daily Wish of MY LORD , Your Lordship 's Most Affectionate Friend , and most Humble and most Faithfull Servant , J. S. PREFACE , TO THE Sincere Lovers of Truth in both our Learned Universities . Gentlemen , I. MANY are the High Encomiums and Glorious Titles which have been given to METAPHYSICKS by those who teach and profess it . They call Her The Queen of Sciences . They tell us that , in regard all other Knowledges do depend for their Certainty and Evidence , on her Sublime Maxims , she is not meerly to be called , in a Common Appellation with the rest , Scientia , a Science ; but Sapientia , or Wisdom ; which carries a kind of Majesty in its Notion above other Endowments of our Understanding . They pretend that she does not only Demonstrate , which every Petty Inferiour Science must , under Penalty of forfeiting her Name and Dignity ; but moreover , that she demonstrates ex Altissimis Causis , by the Highest Mediums or Reasons : In a Word , they make her the Soveraign of all other Sciences ; and give her the Prerogative of Superintending over the rest ; of Assigning to each of them their Province ; of Distributing to each of them their proper Function , and the Matter on which they are to work ; and of Enabling them , by her Supreme Direction and Influence , to Perform what she Enjoyns them ; and much more to that purpose . II. I do not at all wonder that Learned Men have adorn'd Metaphysicks with these and such like Singular Commendations : They are no more but her Just Due . What I admire at is , how , these things being True , and she being of so Transcendent a Dignity , it comes to pass that she is strangely sunk into such an Undervalue and Contempt in the World , that no Body seems to regard her . If her Influence be so Universal , and her Evidence so Clear , who would not strive in the first place to cultivate his Mind with such an Unparallell'd Perfection ? Why are not Schools and Chairs erected in all Learned Societies meerly to teach Metaphysicks , and large Endowments settled to Encourage the Professors of it ? And yet we hear no News of any such . Certainly , it she does , indeed , carry such a high hand over all other sorts of Knowledge , a great Metaphysician should be lookt upon as a Monster of Learning ; at least such an Extraordinary Person , that all Mankind would most highly caress and value him ; whereas tho' Beggery be the Badge of Poetry ; yet a Metaphysician is in such a mean Repute , that , had he no better Livelihood , he might sue to be Subcizer to a Poetaster , and be glad to feed on his Scraps . Whence we may conclude that there is something very much amiss in the business ; and that either the Writers of Metaphysicks have not done her the Right she deserves ; or else that , thro' the Ignorance of the Mob of Half-witted Readers , a General Outery is made against her ; whence Men have taken a Toy at her , and made , a wrong Apprehension of her as Insipid , Dry , Steril and Insignificant . III. There is no doubt but Scepticism also has been a great Enemy , as to all other Sciences , so more especially to Metaphysicks ; because she is the most able to shame and confute ▪ the pretence that there is no Certainty or Evidence at all ▪ Fancy , which being of a contrary Genius , has a natural Antipathy against her , is Another Adversary of hers ; and that a most powerful one ; for it is able to bring into the Field a vast Rabble of Nimble-tongu'd Gentlemen , arm'd cap-a-pie with Flouts , Iests and Drollery , which of late have ( I know not how ▪ ) ●ot the Reputation of Wit , and Noise , if finely deliver'd , has a powerful Ascendent over the Generality . It may be fear'd too , that Voluminous School-term-men , whose Productions have been onely Wordish Digladiations and fencing with Distinctions , without any farther Effect , have given , to many , occasion to think that Metaphysicks is nothing but a Mysterious kind of Talk , to make an Exteriour show of Learning , and appear Extraordinary ; and that to write Metaphysicks , is to no more purpose than 't is to plant a Nursery of Bryars to enlarge a Wilderness . For these Men speak as high of Metaphysicks as any : Whence , Men reflecting that these Large Promises vanish into Smoak , and that neither Principles are layd , nor any Useful Demonstrations or Conclusions drawn thence which are found to be Influential to other Sciences ; it is natural for Men to revenge the Defeat of their High Expectations , by exposing those Authors , and disgracing Metaphysicks it self , as Chicanerie , and altogether Fruitless ▪ & unable to make good what the Professors of it did , in such Big Words , pretend . But , leaving those Persons to answer for their own Faults , let us see what more Indifferent Men have objected against Metaphysicks , and what Reasons they alledge for their Aversion from her . IV. First then 't is objected that Metaphysicks is an Abstruse and Crabbed kind of Study , and scarce Intelligible without Revelation ; so that a Man may break his Teeth with cracking the Shell ; and , when he has done , he will find never a Kernel . Secondly , that it is Aiery , Superficial , and meerly Wordish ; and not handsomely worded neither , but scurvily Barbarous . Thirdly , that it was never yet seen how it influenc'd any other Sciences at all ; as is Pretended . Lastly , that it has no Influence at all upon Men's Manners , nor conduces , in the least , to make them live better . These are the Faults generally imputed to Metaphysicks , which we will consider in their Order . Premising first that I have Reason to hope that whoev●● pleases to peruse attentively our Ensuing Metaphysicks , will see that they are already answer'd to his hand . V. The first Objection is so perfectly Groundless , that the Direct Contrary is most Evident . The Object of Metaphysicks is our most Generall Notions , of Ens or Being : Which an easy Reflexion will tell us , are , of all others , the ●…t Clear and Evident . For , an Individual 〈…〉 ( v. g. Peter ) being constituted by such ● Complexion of Innumerable Accidents as ●s found in no other Thing ; hence , our Knowledge of it is so Confus'd , that , however we can distinguish it , as far as concerns our Use , by Time , Place , and oft-times by some outward ●…dents ; yet the Intrinsecal Essence and ●●ture of that Body is so intricately woven ; ●…omprizes in it the Grounds of such numberless Considerations we may make of it , that 't is impossible to frame any one Distinct Conception or Notion of it . Homo , has fewer ; whence it is more Clear , so that we are now able to frame a Definition of it , which we could not of the Individuum : Yet , because it comprehends in it the Natures or Notions of Animal , Vegetative , Mixt , Body and Ens ; 't is still very Confus'd , and therefore less Clearly Intelligible . Animal is less Confus'd , because it contains fewer Superiour-notions or Natures in it . Vegetative is still less Confus'd than Animal ▪ for the same reason . Mixt is less Confus'd than Vegetable ; Body than Mixt. And lastly , Ens is the least Confus'd of any of the Other ; and , therefore the Clearest of any o● them ; as having no Superiour Notion in it ●● all : Whence all the Composition , and , consiquently , Confusion it has , is that it confound in it the Notions of its own Metaphysical Parts which its Definition [ viz. That which is Capable to bee ] gives us ; which contains onely the Notions of the Power , and of the Act ( viz. Existence , ) to which it is a Power : The Sense● of which Words is so Obvious and Easy , the 't is impossible the rudest Vulgar should be Ignorant of them . VI. Still it will be objected that such Abstracted Words as [ Power ] and [ Act ] ●● Unusual to Mankind , and seem to hover in t● Air , so that no Man can make any Fancy of them . And ; it must be confest they sute not with Fancy at all ( for Brutes have none such , ) nor ought they to sute with it ; for 't is impossible for us to have any Proper or Express I hantasm● of Abstracted Universal Conceptions , because ( as they are such ) they never enter'd into our Senses , nor have any Being but in our Understanding . But , why are not those Notions or Conceptions of [ Power ] and [ Act ] Easy 〈…〉 Can any Man living be ignorant of the Meaning of these Words [ such a thing can be , or may be ? ] 'T is impossible ; nor was there ever any that came to the use of ordinary Knowledge , but understands them - ▪ Now , the Word [ can ] signifies that which we call Power ; and the Word [ Bee , ] that which is the Act of that Power ; only they are put into a manner of Expression● Proper to Abstract Words . Nor can this breed any difficulty : For , he who knows what it is to love , cannot but know what the Noun Substantive [ Love ] means : Nor , was ever any Man who knows what [ White ] and [ Round ] mean , so dull as to be pazzled in knowing the meaning of [ Whiteness ] and [ Roundness . ] Yet the Reader may observe that the main Body of my Metaphysicks is built on the Self-evident Notions or Meanings of those Words , Power and Act , or the different Kinds of them . Whence , were I to begin to teach a Philosophy-School , I should think it best to take this Method ; viz. that , after my Schollers had perfectly learnt the Doctrine of the Ten Predicaments so as to distinguish exactly our Natural Notions , got knowledge of the necessary Laws of Predicating , and how to place the Terms best in order to conclude evidently , I should begin with teaching Metaphysicks : Not at all doubting but that any Man of a good Natural Mother-wit , would perfectly comprehend it ; and , thence , become excellently dispos'd to demonstrate a priori , which is the most Effectual and Best way to attain True Science ; and to branch out his Knowledge of Principles to an incomparably greater Number of Particular Conclusions than he could by Demonstrating a posteriori . Besides , all Inferiour Objects would far more easily , and connaturally , open themselves to his View , after he had once taken a Distant Sight of them from the higher Ground of their Causes and Principles . VII . The Second Objection is grounded on a Gross misunderstanding of the main Fundamental of all True Philosophy ; which I most religiously observe in all my Discourses ; and which , if neglected or not well attended to , brings every thing into Wrangle and Confusion ; which is , that all our Abstracted Conceptions , ( without which we cannot possibly Apprehend , nor consequently Discourse of any thing Distinctly and Clearly ) are of the Things themselves consider'd according to such or such a Respect . This is the Basis of all the Aristot●lian Philosophy ; however there be too Few that exactly attend or hold to it . For example . That Great Man , when he was Distinguishing all our Natural Notions into Ten several Heads , call'd the Second ▪ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , and the Third 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , Quantum and Quale : Now these Words being Concretes of a Thing ( or Substance ) and an Accident , if they be not taken Formally or with a ●eduplication , for the Thing as it is Big , or Qualify'd , would Confound Substance and each of those Accidents , into one Compound Notion ; which being quite contrary to his Intention , which was to distinguish them , we must conclude that he took those words , as we take our Abstract words Quantitas , & Qualitas , in a meer Formal Sense , for the Thing quatenus Quanta , and Quatenus Qualis or Qualify'd ; which word [ Quatenus ] cuts off that precise Consideration or Notion from any other ; which done , their Perfect Distinction is Evident . The Objecter then , may please to reflect that we ( following the same Method ) do mean , by all those Abstract Words , the very Thing it self , Consider'd or Conceiv'd according to such a precise Respect , and no other : So that , when we speak of Power , Act , Essence , Existence , Ens , Suppositum , Person , Bigness , Quality , Relation , &c. we mean still the Thing , apprehended according to such a Formal Consideration ; nor can we , with any Sense mean any thing else . Whence we , building all our Discourses on our Natural Notions , each of which is the Thing it self Conceiv'd thus and not otherwise , do by consequence , ground all our Philosophy on the Things themselves ; which being Establisht in their Essences by GOD'S Creative Wisedom , must be acknowledg'd to be the most Solid Ground imaginable . Wherefore there can be no show of Reason in objecting to us that our Discourses , thus Grounded , are Aiery or Superficial ; whereas it is an Unanswerable Objection against those who build their Philosophy on Ideas ; which they confess not to be the Things , but Distinct from them . To give an Instance what Mistakes arise when Writers do not exactly Distinguish their Abstracted Notions , it would not be much a miss to take notice of the famous Controversie between the late Bp. of Worster and Mr. Locke , which might have been prevented , had this Method of Distinguishing our Conceptions been accurately observ'd . The former of these being worthily Sollicitous , lest the Mystery of the B. Trinity ( which he was then Explicating ) should receive any Prejudice , did check at Mr. Lockes denying he had any Clear Idea of Substance . Now , had Mr. Locke declar'd himself to take the Word [ Substance ] to signifie the Abstracted Notion or Conception he had of the Thing , as it is Distinct from that of the Modes or Accidents , or declar'd it to signifie the Conception of a Thing as it is Capable of Existing ▪ ( which is the First and Proper Notion of a Created ▪ Being ) he might by depuring it first of its Imperfection , necessarily annex● in all Creatures , have Transferr'd it to GOD , and ●● it had been not Injurious but Serviceable to the Explication of that Mystery : ) But he , having in his Eye the words of some Scholas●ic●s , who fail'd of thus Distinguishing it ; and , besides ▪ did not explain it Literally , but call'd it in a Metaphorical Expression , Supporter of the Accidents , had good reason to say that such a Notion of Substance , no farther nor better explicated , was very Obscure ; especially , if they made it a kind of Entity supporting other feebler Entities , as some of them did . IX . Now , to supply their defect , and give the Literal Meaning of that Metaphorical Word [ Supporting , ] the onely good Sense can be made of it is clearly This. The Proper and Precise Notion of Substance as 't is Distinguish from all other Abstracted or Inadequate Notions we make of a Thing or Individuum , is This , that it is Capable of Existing ; which , as 't is thus Conceiv'd , is its Definition : Whereas , let us Define Quantity , Quality , Relation , &c. We find that they do not at all imply in their Notion , that is , in the precise Signification of those Words , any Capacity of Being at all , as did the Other most expresly ; but of Modifying or Determining , after their several Ways , the Thing which is Capable of Being ; because in our Mind we must first conceive the Thing Capable to Bee , ere we can conceive it Capable to be Modify'd . Since then we see Accidents are , and yet out of their own precise Notion are not Capable to bee , they must be conceiv'd to Bee , by Virtue of the Notion of Substance , which is of its own Notion , ( or as signify'd by that Word ) Capable of Being ; whence they are said , by a Metaphorical Expression , to be Supported in Being by Substance . Which also is the true Sense of those Sayings [ Accidentis Essentia est Inhaerentia ; Accidentis Existentia est Inexistentia ] and such like ; which sutes with the Natural Notions of Substance and Accidents both , if Bad Art does not make Disagreement between them . Whence 't is to be noted , that this Supporting here explicated , must signifie the Priority and Dependence one Notion has to the other in our Minds , or , ( which is the same ) which the Thing as thus Conceiv'd , has to the same Thing as otherwise Conceiv'd ; there being a Natural Order or Priority of one Notion to Another in our Mind ; and , consequently , a Dependence on one another ▪ for to think there is a Priority or Dependence on one another in re , as two Things in Nature , of which one is Stronger , the other Feebler , ( which I doubt too many , led by the Sound of Words , imagin ) is most ridiculous Nonsence . Unity , or indivision within its self is the Property of every Ens , or Individual Thing ; and therefore it remains , as in its self , One or Undivided , till our Understanding comes to divide it , after its Fashion , into more Formal , or ( as we call them ) Metaphysical Parts , by her Abstractive Way of Conceiving it by Inadequate Notions . For Answer to the Third Objection , I refer my Reader to the Close of my last Reflexion in Solid Philosophy Asserted ; where this Objection is Clear'd even to the Weakest Understanding . X. Lastly , as to the pretended Uselesness of Metaphysicks , I cannot but admire at the short Speculation of those who object it . Is it of no Use to settle all the First Principles of our Understanding , without which ( as I have Demonstrated in my Non ▪ ultra ) we could know nothing ? Is it of no Use to acquaint us with the Essences of all Beings , whence proceed all the Common sorts of their several Operations ; And to give us , amongst the rest , the Essence of Man , and , consequently , shew what Actions are becoming or misbecoming a Being of such a Nature ? Is it to no Use or Purpose to Demonstrate the Immortality of the Soul , a Tenet upon which all Religion depends ; How it will fare with her when she is Separated from the Body ; or What Dispositions in her when the Man dies will make her Eternally Happy , or most Miserable ? Is it of no Use to Christian Life , or the Good of our Neighbour , to stand up for God's Honour , and preserve others from the damnable Tenet of Atheism , by Demonstrating that there is a Great GOD who governs the World ; who is All-powerful , and Infinitely Iust , Good , Merciful , &c. Is it of no Use to demonstrate the Existence , Essence and Operations of Angels ; and how , by their Means , and the Virtue of other Second Causes , GOD's Wisdom administers the World in the Best and most Providential manner ; and that , therefore Things are not Govern'd by Chance , nor by the Stoical Fatality ? Lastly , is it of no Use to explicate the Mystery of the most B. Trinity ( and other Articles of Christian Faith , ) so clearly , as to show they are perfectly Agreeable to our Natural Notions , and to all the Maxims of True Reason ; which wipes off the Scandal with which Atheists , Deists , and Anti-trinitatians bespatter them , as Perfect Contradictions , and meer Nonsense ; on the Verity of which Tenets ( as will be shown ) depend all the most Effectual motives to Raise Mankind to Heaven , and dispose them for Eternal Happiness ; in Explicating and Defending which Fundamental Articles of Christian Faith Metaphysicks has the Chief Hand ? Certainly , if these things be of no Use , it may certainly be concluded , that no part of Knowledge ( Theology excepted , which also depends , in great part , on Metaphysicks ) is Useful . But , these Objectors discourse as if there were no Use at all to be made of any Science or Art whatever , but of Handicrafts , Agriculture , and such like : As if they had forgot there was any such Thing as Virtue , Truth , Religion , Faith , Soul , Salvation , or even GOD Himself , that deserves to be heeded or regarded . To obviate this Calumny , I have added Meditations at the End of each Chapter ; to show ( as the Matter would bear ) how Applicable and Useful the foregoing Speculations ▪ are to the Improvement of our Mind in Virtue . And I hope , I may , without Immodesty , say thus much for my Metaphysicks , that there never was yet any Speculative Piece written , that makes Reason more Subservient to Faith , nor Philosophy more serviceable to True Divinity than it does . I wish the Example may propogate to others . XI . But , let us suppose that all this which is plainly shewn to the Reader 's Eye , were False ; and that there were no other Good in the Study of M●… physicks , but the Enriching our Minds with Multitudes of High & Solid Truths ; would not this Alone be sufficient to make every Considerate Man apply his Thoughts to that Noblest Science , even tho' it had no farther Effects , nor any Exteriour Use to be made of it ? What is there of more Use than the Mathematicks ? And yet Plutarch tells us in the Life of Marcellus , that Plato was offended with those who did corrupt and disgrace ( as he judged ) the Noble and Excellent Science of Geometry , by making it descend to the contriving Engines , in which the Base and Vile Handy-work of Man was to be Employ'd : And that Archimedes himself esteem'd all his Inventions of Engines but Vile , Beggerly and Dross , in comparison of the Speculative Productions and Demonstrations in that Science . So much were those Great Souls , tho' Heathens , enamour'd with the naked Beauty of TRUTH , for it 's own Sake : So much did they value the Interiour Natural Perfection of their Mind , above the Prospect or Intuitus of any External Use of it , or Profit accruing by it ; which yet is so Unpalatable to our Sceptical Age , I could wish those Noble and Learned Gentlemen , our Modern Virtuoso's , would seriously consider this Temper of those Heroes of Learning in the former World , and think it worthy their Imitation . What excellent Speculative Productions , to the vast Advancement and Progress of True Science , would so many Great wits make in a short time , did they please to think fit to emply their Thoughts in following and carrying on the way of Demonstration . To do which , nothing can more powerfully invite them than to reflect that in so many Years Applying themselves to the way of Induction , they have not been able to establish so much as One Universal Principle in Natural Philosophy , or to gain the Knowledge of any one Scientifical Conclusion : The Impossibility of which by the way of Experiments has been shewn more at large towards the End of the Preface to my Method to Science . XII . Having thus Defended Metaphysicks against the Calumnies thrown upon her , it remains to inform my Reader of my Conduct hitherto in pursuing the Advancement of TRUTH , the only End I aym'd at . After I had publish't my METHOD to Science , I discover'd that the Chief Remora which had kept back Learned Men in our last Century , from attaining True Science , was the Doctrine or Way of Ideas ; which some very Ingenious Men had taken great pains to set up and improve . I observ'd that , That Way had two Especial Patrons ; Cartesius in France , and Mr. John Locke here in England : Both of them were Men of Excellent Parts ; so that it seemd hard to determin which of them had the Advantage in Wit. But , as for their Productions in Philosophy , if I may be allow'd to judge between them , Mr. Locke did in very many particulars , make far greater Advancements towards Science , and in many things arriv'd at it . Whereas the whole Fabrick of the Cartesian Hypothesis is Aiery and Fantastick ; yet so dextrously Propos'd , and so prettily Compacted within it self ( for I cannot at all Commend it for having any Connexion with Principles ) that it decoyes his Readers , who do not reflect that nothing is to be held True which Evident Principles do not warrant , into a kind of Complaisant Assent to his Doctrine : Much after the same manner as our Judgment is lull'd , and our Passions are carry'd along , with Reading a Romance ; so that we become at unawares highly Concern'd ; 'till , our Reason Awaking out of that Pleasing Dream of our Fancy , our Deliberate Iudgment recovers it self ; and we come to reflect , that it is not a True History , but a meer Fiction contriv'd to amuze our Imagination . XIII . These two Ingenious Gentlemen did , in proposing to us their Ideas , take several ways in giving us Account of them . That of Mr. Locke is the more Candid , while he calls them Pictures , Similitudes , Pourtraitures , and such like ; which plainly acknowledges , they are not the Things themselves . Whereas , the Followers of Car●sius ( who , should best know his Mind ) shuffle ●etween the two sides of the Contradiction , and ●eem resolv'd not to be understood . For , sometimes they directly avow they are the very Things themselves Conceiv'd by us , or exsting in our Understanding after a Spiritual Manner ; and , sometimes again , they banter ●nd ridicule what Themselves had Granted . ●f which more hereafter . XIV . Wherefore I saw that my very Design did ●navoidably oblige me to offer my Reasons against both those Authors ; as Persons who ●id not only oppose many Particular Truths , ●ut even obstructed and damm'd up the Way ●o arrive at any Truth at all , while they set ●p and introduc'd this New Way of Ideas , ●s the Only Method by which any Truth in Philo●●hy could be attain'd . This I had done former●● , ( in part , and briefly , ) by laying Grounds to ●●nfute them in my METHOD , where I ●rofessedly declare against the Way of Spiri●ual Ideas in our Mind ; for , as for Corpo●eal Ideas in our Fancy , which we call Phan●●sms , none ever deny'd there were such ; nor ●●n , without calling in Question our Constant ●xperience . Mr. Locke was pleas'd to object to ●e , occasionally , my own Thesis or Conclusi●n ; viz. that I put the Things themselves to ●e in our Understanding ; as if it were so self-evidently Absurd that meerly to name it were enough to confute it . I request I may be represented as not having barely said so , but that I attempted to prove it by many pretended Demonstrations , none of which have yet been Answer'd ; this being the true Case . I beg also that my Tenet may be exhibited not rawly , or to the half part , but fully ; viz. That I hold that the Things are in our Mind Spiritually , or after the manner of her Objects . In which Sense I believe Mr. Locke's Discerning Iudgment would agree with me ; if he would please to wean it a while from his Customary Addiction to his own Way , and bring it to an Indifferency . For I cannot depart from thinking , that the plainest Signification of Words gives it , that , if no Thing be any way in our Knowledge , ( that is , if it be not at all there ) 't is self-evident that We know Nothing . Besides , I think , under favour , that , if his Leasure , Health , and other more pressing Occasions had permitted , some Answer should have been given to my many Arguments produced there in my second Preliminary ; which I have enforced here in the 6th Chapter of my Metaphysicks ; and , moreover , shown the Reason of that Position , B. 2. Ch. 2. Sect. 7 , 8 , 9. And , indeed , without farther Examination of the Validity of those Arguments , it will , at first Sight , seem Prodigious , that so many Pretended Demonstrations ( for they are near Twenty in number ) should be offer'd for any Point that is False ; and that , tho' my whole Discourse , nay all my Philosophical Works , are professedly built on that Thesis , yet not one of them ( had it been so Absurd and False ) should have receiv'd an Answer from such Acute Adversaries . XV. Wherefore , setting aside the Silence of my Opposers , which diverse Circumstances might possibly have occasion'd , I still insist upon it , and do farther alledge , that 't is Absolutely Impossible so many Demonstrations for a Falshood should be Pretended , and yet the Confident Asserter of them should not be Expos'd to Open Shame . Did the Producer of them cloak his Rambling Discourses in Rhetorical Language , Plausible Expressions , or Tricks of Wit ; perhaps he might , in such a Case , ●ave scaped for some time , from being utterly Confuted ; but , when he solely relies on Rigid and Blunt Reason , or on the Close Connexion of Terms , nothing can be Easier , or ●hich more Provokes others to overthrow him . There needs no more but to shew , that the Connexion he pretends to lies Open , or is In●oherent : For , this done , the Sinows of his ●iscourse are Slacken'd and Enfeebl'd , and ●he Arguments he so much presum'd on , lose ●ll their Credit . Truths are so compacted and cimented with one another , that it would be impossible his Reasons should keep up their Repute , when the most Authentick Testimonies of so many Opposite Truths conspire to show their Senseless Vanity . Especially , when those Arguments are pretended to be drawn from the Nature of the several Subjects or Things , there mentioned ; v. g. from the Nature of a Spirit , of the Soul , of her Operation of Knowing , of the Object of Knowledge , of Similitudes , of the Nature of Relation , of our Notions , and of Words which are to signifi● them ; of Predication or the Verification o● Propositions , &c. For , in such a Case , each of these Natures having their peculiar Maxims or Principles belonging to them , all which give Light , and are Consonant to one another , all the Art of Mankind could not possibly hinder such a Position from being seen plainly ▪ and held , to be Pure Nonsence . On the other side nothing that I can see has been Objecte● against this Position , but that their Fancy , t● which it is very Unsuitable , is out of Humou● at it . Whereas that Faculty ( it being perfectly Material , and Common to Us , and Brute● has nothing at all to do with Spiritual Natures or their Operations ; in regard they never enter'd into our Senses , nor , consequently could we have any Phantasms of them ; a● yet these Gentlemen seem to make their Fanc● the Sole Judge in such Matters , of which she is no more able to have any Light , than a Blind man is to see Colours . XVI . The Cartesian Ideists did , indeed , oppose that Thesis which a Jest or too ; but ( I thank them ) never Answer'd so much as one of my Arguments ; as if they held that the Nature of Man did not consist in Rationality , but meerly in Risibility . The rest of their Performances was Railing , Forging and Ridiculous Libelling . What Success they had , may be seen in my several Replies , viz. in my Ideae Cartesianae Expensae , my NONULTRA , or RULE of TRUTH , and my Raillery Defeated by Calm Reason . In which their Philosophy ( as they call'd it ) was shewn to be quite destitute of any Principles ; their Fundamental Positions were confuted by Plainest Demonstrations ; nay , their very RULE of Knowing any thing , was manifestly and Unanswerably Prov'd to be most Ridiculous Nonsense . But , that which put them to Silence and Shame was the Fair Offer or Civil Challenge I sent them ( Rule of Truth , p. 119. 120 , 121. ) to bring so much as One Argument which they would vouch to be Conclusive , for any One Point of the Cartesian Doctrine , and it should Conclude the whole Cause : Or , if that were too Troublesome ; that they would barely Name any Principle of theirs which they conceiv'd to be the Strongest or most Evident of any they had , and which they judg'd was Influential upon the Cartesian Doctrine ; and I would undertake to Demonstrate that either it was , no Principle ; or else that it had no force to prove any one Point of their Doctrine True , nor had any Influence upon it . This was so Direct and Honest a Procedure on my part , and so Easy to be comply'd with , on theirs , in case they had , indeed , any one such Principle ; and yet ( as appear'd of their Non-acceptance of it ) so impossible to be done , or comply'd with , that every Intelligent Man could not but see that Cartesius did only talk Wittily in the Air , but had not so much as one Inch of Firm Ground on which he could build the least piece of his Doctrine . XVII . Hence , the more I consider'd these Unaccountable things call'd Ideas , the more I became Dissatisfy'd with them . For , first , I could not get any Light from the Users of them to guess at , much less know what they are . ● saw the Ideists totally build upon them , and divide them into many several sorts ; yet none of them were so kind as to acquaint us what Kind or Sort of Things the Ideas themselves were , or what was their Generical Notion ; without knowing which all those Particular Sorts of them , and , consequently , their whole Book● were utterly Unintelligible . The Cartesian● made them several , and Inconsistent things ; that is , perfectly and in many Regards , Chimerical . Now they tell us they are the very Things themselves , as conceiv'd by us . Presently after , their Fancy recoiling , they tell us that Vicem gerunt rei , that is , that they stand instead of the Things ; which signifies they are not the Things . Can the Thing , stand for , or supply the place of it self ? Or can there need any Proxy for what is , it self , Present to the Mind ? What can any Man living make of that which neither is the Thing , nor is not the Thing ; or rather which at once , both is the Thing , and is not the Thing ? Shortly after , as if they meant to split an Indivisible , or to nick the Middle between two Contradictions , they explicate their Ideas to be [ quasi res ] as if it were the Thing ; whereas one should rather think that , if they be not the Thing , they are as if it were Nothing . Afterwards they assure us they are Ipsissima Mentis Operatio , the very Operation or Action of the Mind . Now , this is neither the Thing , which is the Object of our Understanding , ( if it knows any Thing ) as they sometimes grant ; nor what stands for the Object , nor so much as if it were the Object ; but is relatively Contradistinct or Opposit to the Object ; for the [ Operation ] and [ that on which it Operates ] are most clearly such . Again , they tell us 't is a Representation of the Thing , but not a meer Similitude of it . The latter Words tell us what it is not ; and , lest we might hapto understand the former which should tell us distinctly what it is , they quibble in it , and make it ambiguous . The Obvious sense of Representare is to Resemble ; but they have found out an odd Sense it may ( as a Term of Art ) have in some Occasions , and to amuze us , they pretend it must have it here ; which is , presentem sistere ; that is , to put or set the Thing Present to the Mind . Well then ; if it puts or makes the Thing Present to the Mind , Common Sense tells us the Thing it self is in the Mind when 't is made Present to it , or put there : And if the Thing it self be there , why is it said that only Vicarium Rei , or quasi-Res is there ? What Stuff is this ! See each of those particulars at large shewn from their own express Words , Ideae Cartesianae Indicatio 3 , from p. 116. to p. 124. XVIII . Mr. Locke's Candour and Iudiciounes set him above this Shuffling Folly. He could not but see it would be expected from him , and was Necessary , to give us some Definition of an Idea , since his whole Essay proceeds upon Ideas ; yet his Acute Foresight made him Wary to Venture upon such an Impossible Task ▪ Wherefore he thought it best to hover aloo● , without giving us any Particular or Distinct Character of it . Accordingly he tells us ▪ B. 1. Ch. 1. Sect. 8. that He us'd the Word [ Idea ] to express whatever is meant by Phantasm , Notion , Species , or what ever it is which the Mind can be employ'd about in Thinking . This , I must confess , is very Genteelly and Civilly done , to leave it to the Reader 's Choyce to let that Word signifie as he pleas'd , or to make what he could of it ; but it had been a greater Kindness to let him know Distinctly in what Sense Himself took it ; without which it was impossible for any Man to understand his following Book ; no not so much as the Titles of his Chapters . Indeed , had the Sense of those Words he mentions , been the self - same , and the Word it self Univocal , it had been Indifferent which Word he had pitcht upon , since they had the same Signification : But when the Meanings of some of them is as vastly and widely Different as the two first Species of Ens , [ Body and Spirit , ] are ; in that case to declare his own Indifferency which Word we would use , and leave it to our Choyce in which of those Senses we would understand him ; does leave the Readers in perplexity , and utterly in the Dark , what an Idea is ; and , besides , exposes him to a possible Mistake of his Mind every step he takes while he peruses his Book . For a Phantasm , which is the Proper Object of the Fancy , is meerly Material , Corporeal , and Common to Brutes as well asto Mankind : And Notions which are the Elements of Cognition , must he above Matter , and of an Intellectual or Spiritual Nature . Wherefore the Confounding thus the Sense of those two Words , hazards to lead the Author and his Readers to confound Corporeal & Spiritual Natures : Which diverse complain of in this Gentleman ; and my self , tho' I much honour his Person , and highly esteem his Excellent Parts , cannot but think this is one of the Greatest Desiderata in his Ingenious Book . Besides , a [ Phantasm ] is not that about which the Mind is employ'd , ( as Notions are ; ) it being the Proper Object of that Faculty call'd the Fancy or Imagination . And this is that I fear which occasions much Unevenness in his Discourses . Sometimes he builds on Notions or Spiritual Conceptions , taken from Natural Objects , as others do ; and then his Productions are very Solid and Judicious ; sometimes again , he grounds his Discourses on Roving Conceits suggested by Witty Fancy ; and then they are Aiery and Superficial , and impossible to be Reduc'd to any Solid Principle . When he does the one , when the other , is noted in my Reflexions on the several parts of his Essay . To shew this by an Instance ; it has been remark't by my self , as it has been also by others , that , in His Excellent Demonstration of a First Being , no Man can discourse more Clearly or more Solidly : But then , withall , 't is observable that while he does this , he lays aside his Way of Ideas , and argues in the same manner as one would do who had never heard of them ; or as those would go to work who oppose them . XIX . Not being able to gain any kind of Light from the Ideists themselves , what their so much magnify'd Ideas should mean , or what to make of them ; I set my own Thoughts to work , to find out ( if I could ) what kind of things they might be . Others may be as acutely Ingenious as they please : I , for my part , have but One plain Dunstable way to satisfie my self and others in such a case ; which is , to consider to which of those Ten Heads of our Natural Notions ( call'd the Ten Predicaments ) they might belong . Resting assur'd that ( till that Division of all our Notions be Confuted ) whatever belongs to none of them , or confounds the Distinction of them , is not any Natural Notion a● all , onely which are the Solid Elements of True Knowledge ; and , consequently , that it is no more but a Fancy . At first sight , I discern'd they must be of a Spiritual Nature , because they are put to be in the Soul. Next , that they must have a peculiar Entity of their own , distinct from the Soul ; because they make them to be her Informers or Intelligencers , which sufficiently tells us they are distinct Things from the Soul which they inform . I proceeded therefore , to find out the Essence of this New Entity , and what it consisted in . In this Quest the Cartesians gave me no Light at all , as has been shown ; but Mr. Locke lent me some Assistance , while he constantly characters them to be Similitudes . Now a Thing whose Essence it is to be a Similitude is a Monstrous Chimera . For the Notion of Thing or Entity belongs formally to Substance , and has a Positive or Absolute Sense ; and Similitude or Likeness belongs to Relation ; which makes the Heads , or Notions of Substance and Relation to be Essentially and Formally the self ▪ same . A Thing may indeed be Related to Another , or like it ; but then the Thing to which the Mode of Relation supervenes , must be of its own Nature Positive , for the Relation cannot be with any Sense conceiv'd to be what 's Related . So that this Notion of an Idea seem'd to me to be a meer Hirco-Ceruus , a Positive ( or Unrelative ) Relative : A Substance which is a Relation , and a Relation which is a Substance ; or at once , That which is Related , and That by which 't is Related . Which makes a Babel of our Inward Speech by our Conceptions , and is purely Chimerical . XX. I was as much at a loss , to know what these Ideas which they put to be Similitudes , were good for , or to what Use they serv'd . When we have once the Materials of Knowledge into our Mind , our Soul , by her Reflexion , can work upon them and order them well enough . Wherefore , all the Kindness they can do us , is to give us the First Notices of the Thing : But this they cannot do ; because the Thing it self must be in our Mind , or else we cannot know that they are even Similitudes ; since we cannot see they are Like a Thing , till we know what the Thing it self is , to which they are Like . Otherwise we shall fall into that pretious Nonsense of Bayes , the Conceited Poetaster , in the Rehearsal . [ I Gad , says he , I have an Excellent Similitude , if I knew but what to apply it to . ] Nor can there be worse Sense , than to say , [ 'T is Like , indeed , but I know not to what 't is like . ] Whence is concluded , that we must have the Thing it self in our Knowledge , before we can know what 's either Like it , or Unlike it . And if the Thing it self , ( as being the Original ) be in our Knowledge First , what need we any Ideas to make us know it , since to be in a Knowing Power is to be Known . XXI . I am sure Similitudes are of no use in Metaphysicks , tho' they serve to good purpose in Mathematicks ; for when we come to Universal Notions , such as are Act , Power , Essence , Existence and such like , those Proper & Express Similitudes disappear ; and the Ideists must either bid farewell to their Ideas or Resemblances , ( which will be very Uncomfortable to them ; ) or they will find themselves at a great loss . For example ; I would ask them what kind of Thing is this Pourtraiture or Idea of Existence ? Has it Being , or has it none : If none , 't is Nothing : If it be such a Thing as has Being in it , it cannot be known without Another Idea ; nor That , without Another Idea , and so Endlesly . If it be such a Thing as can be in the Mind , and known there without any Idea of it ; why may not Other Things be there too , and known by themselves , or without any Idea as well as it ? What even Answer is given , I am confident it will be precarious & alledg'd gratis . Again , is the Essence or Nature of this Idea of Existence such that it is Essentially Existent , or not ? If the Former , 't is a GOD ; whose sole Perogative it is to be Essential Existence : If the Later , then ' its Nature is onely Potential to Existence , and not Actual Existence ; and then how should that which is onely Potential to Existence , or onely a Power to Bee , be a Resemblance or Similitude of Existence it self , that is , of Actual Being ? Many such Exceptions might be brought against such Ideas which are onely Similitudes of Things in our Minds , and not the Things themselves . Now in our way , how impossible is it to oppose any such Difficulties ? We conceive the Thing Inadequately , and make many Abstracted Notions of it ; and amongst the rest , since the Thing does Exist , we abstract or cut off This from other Notions of it , by considering it precisely according to This Respect ; and thence we come to have in our Mind the true Notion or Nature of Existence . XXII . And , hence it comes that , since amongst our Natural Abstracted Notions which we have from Bodies ( with which onely we converse ) either by Direct Impressions or Obvious Reflexion , there are some that are very Imperfect , Potential , and clogg'd with Matter ; and Others that are more Universal , and Defaecated from Matter , such as are Act , Ens , Essence , Existent , Subsistent , Person , &c. Those who proceed upon the way of Abstracted Notions of the Thing , can , by discoursing upon those Notions of the Later sort , not onely demonstrate those Beings which are of a Superiour Nature , to which such Notions , stript of their Imperfections , do agree ; as we have done in our Metaphysicks : but , moreover , they become hence enabled to explicate the Mysteries of Christian Faith , and shew their Conformity to our Natural Notions , as we have shewn , in our Appendix , that Highest Mystery of the B. Trinity is ; which makes the Principles of Nature ( and Art too ) bear a kind of Secondary Testimony to their Truth . Now , I would gladly know what Assistance the Way of Ideas can afford us in such a case ; Similitudes of Angels , and of GOD , and generally of all Spiritual Natures , would be strange Language , and the applying them to such Subjects would look very Extravagant . 'T is this Way then , I much fear , which has given occasion to many , either to deny Spiritual Natures , as do the Atheists ; or else to apply the worst of Corporeal Attributes to them . Rather , indeed , I may complain , that a right Understanding of Spiritual Nature is so stifled and depraved ; that , if care be not taken , it will quickly be lost to Mankind : 'T is a strange step to it , or rather the utmost Attempt of quite destroying and Effacing it out of Men's Minds , when we see it openly maintain'd that GOD himself is Spatium reale , which is the Notion of Quantity . For which reason I have exerted my self in my Metaphysicks to demonstrate & explicate the Nature of a Spirit , & even to force the right Conception of it , in despite of the Reluctancy of Fancy . XXIII . In a word , since Ideas are both Unintelligible , and altogether Useless , & ( I fear ) ill Use is made of them , contrary to the Intention of their Authors ; it seems but fitting that the Way of Ideas should be lay'd aside ; nay , that the very Word [ Idea ] which has got such a Vogue , should be no longer heard of ; unless a good reason may be given why we should use such Words as no Man understands . Your Faithful Servant , I. S. THE CONTENTS . BOOK I. Of the ESSENCES of Compound Entities . CHAP. I. Of POWER and ACT. § . 1. POWER and ACT are Natural or Common Notions . 2. There are Three Sorts of each . 3. The First Sort of Power belongs to all Things , but the First Being . 4. And is Essential to them . 5. Hence the Definition of Created Ens , is , [ That which is Capable of Being ▪ ] 6. This Power consists in it's Possibility , or Non-Repugnance to Bee. 7. What Metaphysical UNITY is . 8. The Essences of Things , Antecedently to their Existence , are only in the Divine Intellect . 9. How the Cartesian Doctrine leaves no Ens in the World. 10. How the Essences of Things are in the Divine Understanding . 11. And how they are said to be Eternal . 13. In what consists Metaphysical VERITY . 14. Hence the First Formal Truths are Identical Propositions . 15. Of which there are only Two Sorts . 16. Why some Propositions are said to be Aeternae Veritatis . 17. The Second sort of Power respects not the Notion of Existence , but the Notion of THING . 18. In what Sense Bodies are said to be Compounded of This Power and Act. 19. This Second Power , [ MATTER ] is the Sole Ground of all Mutability . 20. Hence Pure Acts are Immutable . 21. The Third sort of Power respects Modes or Accidental Acts. 22. Which , tho' not Properly Things , have yet Analogical Essences . 23. What Metaphysical Divisibility and Composition are ; which give the Ground to all Logick . 24. Hence there is not the least Show of Contradiction in the Doctrine of the TRINITY . 25. Nor in that of the INCARNATION , or other Mysteries of Reveal'd Religion . 26. The Difference between Logical and Metaphysical ABSTRACTION . 27. That Excellent and most Useful Maxim , That [ There are no Actual Parts in any Compound whatever ] , Demonstrated and Explicated . 28. The Ground and Reason of that Solid Maxim , [ Actiones & Passiones sunt Suppositorum . ] 29. Hence the Cartesians destroy the Notions of Unum and Ens. 39. The Proper Metaphysical Parts of BODY , are the Second sort of Power and Act ; call'd , in Physicks , MATTER and FORM. 31. The Possibility or Essence of a BODY consists in the Agreeableness of it's Matter and Form. 32. That there is no Real or Actual Distinction in any Ens whatever . 33. How many Sorts , or Common Kinds , of Entities are Possible to be Created . 34. [ Existence ] is the Ultimate Act of Ens. 35. Wherefore it ought rather to be call'd Actuality , than an Act. 36. Hence is Demonstrated , that [ There is a GOD. ] Advertisement . In what Sense we take all the words we use throughout our whole Philosophy . MEDITATION . The Method how GOD's Providence gave us our Elements of Knowledge ; and ripen'd our Knowledge afterwards ; What great Encouragement our Present Acquests have given us ; and what Assured Hopes of Success in our Quest of Science ; so we ground our Discourses on the Natures of the Things , made and establisht by GOD's Creative Wisdom . CHAP. II. Of the ESSENCES of Bodies in in Common ; and of the First , or Simple , Bodies in particular . § . 1. ALl Concrete Notions do include some Form , which constitutes them such . 2. The Form of [ Ens , ] is [ Essence . ] 5. The Essences of Pure Acts consists in Actual Knowledge . 4. Yet they are Potential to the Act of [ Existence . ] 5. The Essence of Body is chiefly taken from it's Form. 6 , Yet , not only , but from the Matter also . 7. Quantitative and not Quantitative are not the Proper Differences that constitute Body and Spirit . 8. The Essence of the FIRST MATTER of the Cartesians cannot consist in only Extension . 9. Nor ( as Mr. Locke speculates ) in Extension and Impenetrability together . 10. Every Body is essentially a Distinct Part of Nature . 11. Wherefore 't is essentially ordain'd for some Proper and Primary Operation in Nature . 12. Wherefore what sits it for this Primary Operation , does Constitute it . 13. In this Fitness to perform this Primary Operation , consists it's Metaphysical Bonity or GOODNESS . 14. Every Body , is , also , Essentially an Instrument . 15. The Essential Difference of Body is chiefly taken from it's Action . 16. The Modes or Accidents which make Bodies thus Fit , are their ESSENTIAL or SUBSTANTIAL FORM. 17. But the Thing must retain that Complexion of Accidents for some time . 18. Divisibility in common , cannot constitute any Body . 19. More and Less of Divisibility , may . 20. One or Two different Accidents may constitute the Simplest Bodies . 21. Wherefore the Elements may be constituted by Rarity or Density . 22. That is , they were thus Constituted at first ; tho' , perhaps , there are not any such now . 23. Hence the Cartesian First Matter , which they put neither to be Rare nor Dense , is a Chimera . MEDITATION . What we have gain'd by our Speculation hitherto . What Dull Unactive Instruments Bodies are : Yet none of them is Useless , but in it's Degree Good. The Reason why we discourse of such Abstract Notions ; and of the many Vast Advantages that Way yields . CHAP. III. Of the Essences of Mixt , Vegetable , and Animal Bodies . § . 1. 'T Is scarce conceiveable there should be , now , any Pure Elements . 2. How First-Mixt Bodies may be conceiv'd to have been made . 3. The Essential Form of First-Mixt Bodies . 4. And their Essence , or Total Form. 5. The Second Sort of Mixt Bodies . 6. The Third Sort of Mixts . 7. The Fourth Sort. 8. What other Accidents are added , to make Variety of Mixts and Demixts . 9. Yet Rarity and Density are the Principal , and most Intrinsecal . 10. Hence , the Corpuscularians can give no account of the Intrinsecal Constitution of any Natural Body . 11. Of the several Sorts of Demixts . 12. The Ground of Sensible Qualities . 13. Of Imperfect Mixts . 14 Of Living Bodies . 15. Of Vegetables . 16 , The Primary Operation of Vegetables . 17. The Form of Vegetables . 18. The Essence of Animals . 19. The Primary Operation of Animals . 20. What Animal is most Perfect in it's Kind . 21. In what Sense we speak here of the Primary Operation of meer Animals . MEDITATION . What has been prov'd here , Recapitulated . The Excellency of Metaphysicks ; and the Sublime Way of Discoursing , peculiar to that Science . What sleight ways of Discoursing are affected by some Great Pretenders to Science . Of our Duty , as we are Rational Creatures . CHAP. IV. Of the Essence of MAN. § . 1. MAN is One Thing , made up of Soul and Body . 2. Therefore the Soul and Body , are , here , only Potential Parts of Man. 3. Therefore , neither Part can Operate Alone . 4. According to that Excellent Maxim , [ Actiones & Passiones sunt Suppositorum . ] 5. Hence , the Christian Tenet of the Incarnation is Agreeable to Right Reason . 6. Of the Act or Form of Man , as he is MAN. 7. That Both Parts concur to every Operation of Man , as he is Man. 8. Hence every Notion has a Phantasm accompanying it . 9. Of the Total Form of Man. 10. What , chiefly , in both those Parts , distinguishes Man from all Other Things . 11. Hence , all pretence of GOD's Voluntary Annexing one thing to another , is Groundless and Unphilosophical . 12. Hence the Mens is not the Man , as Cartesius fancy'd . 13. The Soul's Manner of Existing and Operating , here , is , in part , Corporeal . 14. The Primary Operation of Man , is Reasoning . 15. The Attainment of Truth , is the Perfection of Man's Understanding . 16. The Knowledge of Truth , which thus perfects Man , must be Evident . 17. Hence , Probability perfects no Man. 18. Nor the Improvements of Memory , or Fancy . 19. Hence , the Promoting Evident Truth is the Noblest Action of Man , as he is Intellectual . 20. Hence , ERROUR is the Greatest Depravation of Man's Nature , as he is Cognoscitive . 21. The Essence of Man is RATIONALITY . 22. And Distinguishes him from Angels and Brutes . 23. Hence [ Animal Rationale ] is his True Definition . 24. In Rationality are included the Powers of Apprehending and Judging ; as also of Receiving Impressions from the Senses . 25. The Power of Reflecting , is also an Essential Property of Man. 26. The Soul acquires Knowledge by Impressions , from Outward Objects , on the Senses . 27. First Proof . 28. Second Proof . 29. Third Proof . 30. Fourth Proof . 31. Fifth Proof . 32. Sixth Proof . 33 Seventh Proof . 34. Eighth Proof . 35. That the Soul cannot Elicit Ideas out of her self , Prov'd from many heads . 36. That the Position which makes the Soul and Body Two Things , hinders the Right Explication of Christian Faith. 37. And , moreover , makes every Man to be a Monstrous Chimera . 38. That the Pre ▪ existence of Souls is a Senseless Conceit , and Impossible . 39. So is the Pythagorean Transmigration . 40. That 't is a Folly to ask how the Soul and Body ( which they fancy Two Things ) come to be United . MEDITATION . What Immediate Steps we have taken in our Rational Progress hitherto . Why it was Fitting such a Creature as Man should be made . By what Connatural Means GOD's Infinite Wisdom contriv'd that Soul and Body should make up One Thing . The Condition of our Soul , here , laid open . What Incredible Inconveniencies and Absurdities arise from putting the Soul and Body to be Two Things . CHAP. V. Of the Constitution and Dissolution of Individual Bodies . § . 1. THat only Individuals are properly THINGS . 2. And therefore only Individual Essences are properly ESSENCES . 3. Yet , we can discourse more clearly of the Common Essences , than we can of the Individual ones . 4. There go more Accidents to constitute the Individuum , than there go to constitute the Common Essences . 5. The Individual Complexion of Accidents is the most Perfect Act next to that of Existence . 6. Hence 't is Demonstrated that to give Existence is above the Power of Natural Causes , and only Peculiar to GOD. 7. There must be some Instant in which the Individual Thing first begins to Bee. 8. This Complexion of Accidents is Essential to the new-made Individuum . 9. Therefore it is the Essential or Substantial FORM of the Individual Compound . 10. Those Accidents that accrue afterwards are Accidental . 11. To be an Individuum , some degree of Constancy , Permanency , or Stability , is requir'd . 12. Which Existence , supervening , does establish 13. The Twisting the Results of so many Causes into one Individuum , argues the Design of an All-comprehending Providence . 14. This Complexion of Accidents can never be eradicated while the Individuum continues . 15. And gives the Compound a Different Genius , and Natural Propension . 16. Existence can with no show of Reason be pretended to be the Principle of Individuation . 17. The Distinction between the Notion of a Subsistent Thing or a Suppositum ; and the Notion of an Individual Ens , clearly manifested . 18. How , and When the Individuality is lost . 19. The First Rule how to know this . 20. The Second Rule . 22. The Third Rule . 22. Hence Simple Division of the Matter , or Quantity , in Living Bodies , does not change the Individuum . 23. Much less in Man. 24. When 't is Chang'd in Simple Bodies . 25. When in First-Mixt Bodies . 26. When in Demixts . 27. When in Homogeneous Mixts . 28. When in very Heterogeneous , or Organical Bodies . 29. Two Contradistinct Natures may compound One Thing . 30. The Divine and Humane Natures may si●●sist in the same Suppositum . 31. Notwithstanding , those Natures and their Properties must remain Unmingled ; and not Confounded , as some Eutvchians imagin'd . 32. Yet , all the Actions and Padions must be attributed to the Suppositum ; tho' according to such a Nature ; contrary to what Nestorius fancy'd . 33. Hence , Lastly , There is no show of Contradiction that GOD should be Three according to the Respect of Person ; and yet not-Three , but One , according to the Respect of Nature or Essence . 34. A large Explication of some Grounds , very Useful to take off all Shadow of Contradiction from divers Chief Mysteries of Christian Faith ; and to show how Consonant they are to the most Exact Rules of Right Reason . MEDITATION . How impossible it is for us to know perfectly all that belongs to our own Individuum . By what Wonderful and Untraceable ways GOD's Providence has brought about our Individuation ; and gives us all our Knowledge , and other Endowments . How little our Best Performances contributed to the Acquisition of them ; and , how little reason the most Knowing and most Virtuous Man living has to be Proud of the most Laudable Actions GOD has done by him . That we ought to comply with the Designs of our Creatour by pursuing the End of our Nature ; and by what Means this may be best accomplisht . CHAP. VI. Some Preliminaries fore-lay'd , in order to Demonstrate the Immortality of the Soul. § . 1. WE cannot but have Different Conceptions of the Essence of MAN. 2. And , consequently , of every Operation of his , a● he is Man. 3. We are , therefore , to examine whether there be any thing in Man according to his Soul , which is above Quantity or Matter . 4. There are Three Distinct Operations of Man , as he is Intellective . 5. The Notion of [ Ens ] or [ Thing ] is Indifferent to Actual Being and not-being : 6. Every Form must denominate the Subject , in which it is , such as the Form it self is . 7. A Notion may either be consider'd [ Subjectively ] or [ Objectively . ] 8. Every Object of our Knowledge must either be the Thing it self in , the Mind , or something that 's Like it . 9. NOTIONS , ( understood objectively , ) are the Things themselves , as they are in the Mind ; and not meer Similitudes of them ; Prov'd unanswerably . 10. Prov'd no less unaswerably , by the Concession of the Ideists themselves , that the Thing it self must thus be in the Mind . 11. In what Sense that saying , [ Every Like is not the Same ] is verify'd . 12. Every Inadequate Notion , we have of the Thing , is of the Whole Thing Confusedly and Materially ; tho' it be only of one Metaphysical Part , or Considerability of it , Distinctly and Formally . 13. A Third Unanswerable Proof , that the Thing must be in the Mind when we know it . 14. The Author's Reason why he builds on this Thesis . The Reasons why some others are backwards in Assenting to it . 15. Notwithstanding , the Immortality of the Soul may be demonstrated , tho' this Thesis were wav'd . CHAP. VII . Of the Immateriality , and , consequently , the Immortality of Man's SOUL . § . 1. FIrst Leading Demonstration . Because her Operations , and Objects are receiv'd in her after an Indivisible Manner . 2. Dem. II. Because her Capacity is Infinite . 3. Dem. III. Because she has Other Natures in her without Altering her own . 4. Dem. IV. Because they are in her , not as Intrinfecal Modes affecting Her ; but as Distinct from her : Contrary to the Nature of Material Subjects . 5. Dem. V. Because the Contrary Thesis is Opposite to the Natural Notions of all Mankind . 6. [ Existence ] is the only Absolute Notion we have , and all the rest are Respective . 7. Dem. VI. Because she has in her the Notion of [ Existence ] which is every way Indivisible . 8. Dem. VII . Because she has Actual Respects in her . 9. This Demonstration enforced . 10. Dem. VIII . Because she has in her the Notions or Natures of Vast Quantities ; which are impossible to be there Themselves as they are in Matter ; n●● yet any Material Similitudes of them . 11. Dem. IX . Because the Parts of Motion are perfectly Distinct and Determinate in the Soul ; which are utterly Undistinguisht and Indeterminate as they are in Material Subjects . 12. Dem. 10. Because the Soul has Past and Future Parts of Time Present in her at once . 13. Dem. XI . Because the Soul can tye together as many Singulars as she pleases , in the Notion of One Number ; of which ( generally ) the Fancy can have no Material Resemblance . 14. Dem. XII . Because Sensible Qualities , tho' Innumerable , and Contrary to one another , are in the Soul , without Disordering her in the least . 15. Dem. XIII . Because the said Qualities , as in her , do not fight and expel one another ; as they must , were their Subject made of Matter . 16. Dem. XIV . Because Innumerable multitudes of various and large Figures are in the Soul at once . 17. Dem. XV. Because the Soul has in her Universal Notions . 18. Dem. XVI . Because the Thing is , in and by the Soul , Divided into such Parts as Material Division cannot reach . 19. Dem. XVII . Because that kind of Composition , which the Soul makes afterwards of these thus-Divided Parts , is impossible to be perform'd by a Material Agent . 20. Hence is seen the reason why Angels do not thus Compound and Divide ; and , consequently , they know the Whole Thing Intuitively . 21. Dem. XVIII . Because what is meant by the Copula [ is , ] which we use in all our Affirmative Iudgments , cannot be so much as shadow'd or represented by a Material Similitude . 22. Dem. XIX . Because the Connexion of the Conclusion with Right Premisses , is above the force of all Nature , or Matter , and impossible to be Solv'd or Broken. 23. Dem. XX. Because all the Notions the Soul has , are most concise , and exact , even to an Indivisible . 24. Dem. XXI . Because the Soul is a Pure Act , and therefore Immaterial . 25 : Dem. XXII . Because the Soul gives a kind of Being to Non-Entities and Chimeraes , which can have no Existence in Nature . 26 : How some do mistake the Nature of the Indivisibility attributed to the Soul. 27. The Proper and True Sense in which a Spirit is said to be Indivisible . 28. That 't is consonant to the Nature of the Subject that the Soul should contain Corporeal Nature , and it 's Modes , Indivisibly . 29. In what Sense we are to take the word [ Instantaneous ] , when we say the Operations of Pure Spirits are such . 30. Last Demonstration , Concluding the Whole Point ; That our Soul , it heing so manifestly and manifoldly Demonstrated to be IMMATERIAL , is necessarily IMMORTAL . MEDITATION . In discoursing of our Soul , we must transcend our Senses and Corporeal Phantasms ; and avail our selves only by Reflexion on those Operations which are Proper to it . 'T is to be fear'd , the Chief Origin of Atheism is in Men's Wills , it being so easie to satisfie their Understandings . What Duties are incumbent on Us , who know and acknowledge our Soul to be Immortal . Our former Demonstrations of that Great and most Concerning Truth summ'd up , and Recapitulated . Of what vast Importance it is to lay 〈…〉 heart this Preliminary Truth to all Religion . BOOK II. Of PURE ACTS . CHAP. I. Of the SOUL SEPARATED , and ANGELS . § . 1. THe Soul , does , at her Separation , receive some Change , according to the Manner of her Existing , and her Suppositality : 2. The Means how this is done , illustrated . 3. Yet the same Individual Nature remains in her . 4. All the Knowledges and ( Unretracted ) Affections the Soul had here , remain still in her . 5. Each Soul , when Separated , knows all Created Truths . 6. How this is very Possible . 7. Hence , every Separated Soul knows all Time , and Place . 8. Hence her Operations are not measur'd by Time ; They and their Subject being of a Superiour Nature . 9. Hence , she will be Eternally Miserable , unless she knows the First Cause , GOD. 10. Hence also , she is naturally Unchangeable . 11. Hence too , as soon as Separated , she knows all the Thoughts and Affections , Words and Actions of her past Life . 12. Whence follows the Particular Judgment , which determines her Lot at the hour of Death . 13. Hence is understood how the Book of Conscience will be laid open at the Last Day . 14. And how Infants are connaturally sav'd by Baptism . 15. Hence Ana-Baptism is Impious and Unnatural . 16. The foregoing Principles show how much more easie it is for the Saints and Angels in Heaven to know our Actions and Necessities . 17. The Practical Iudgments , or Affections , do carry the Soul to the Attainment of the Good she most Lov'd here , in case it be Attainable in the Future State. 18. The Best Intellectual Good , or the Sight of GOD is Attainable in the Next Life , if the Soul be Dispos'd for it . 19. Therefore to work up our Christian Principles to such Good Dispositions , ought to be the whole Employ of our Life here . 20. This good Disposition is CHARITY , or the Love of GOD above all things . 21. Hence all the Means and Motives laid by our B. Saviour , tend only to breed and cultivate in our Souls this Predominant Affection for Heaven . 22. Hence RELIGION is the Way of breeding up Souls in such a manner as may dispose them f●… Eternal Bliss . 23. From the same Principles is Demonstrated , that , To depart hence with a Contrary Disposition , 〈…〉 a First Affection for any Creature , will torment the Soul , when Separated , with most Unspeakable Grief and Anguish . 24. The State of Separation Elevates the Soul to a●… Incomparably higher Perfection of Existence , ( sh●… being then a Pure Act ) than she had here . 25. Wherefore , it does , consequently , Elevate the Activity of all her Powers ; and particularly the Acts of her Will , her Affections , to an Unconceiveable Intenseness and Vehemency , above what she had while in the Body . 26. Hence the Poena Damni in Wicked Souls fo●… the Loss of the Sight of GOD ; and also the Loss of th●… Temporal False Good they here doted on , is Unspeakable ; and plunges them in a HELL of Misery . Their Sad Condition describ'd . 27. Hence 't is evident that GOD damns no Man ▪ but that the Sinner , while he hugs and cherishes 〈…〉 his Thoughts those Inordinate Affections for Creatures , on which , by his own Deliberate Choice , 〈…〉 had set his First Love ; does connaturally kindl●… and foment , all the while , Hell-Fire in his own Soul ▪ To which GOD contributes no farther , but by conserving the Wisest Course of the World , that Prope●… Causes should have their Effects ; which he has 〈…〉 reason to alter for their sakes . 28. The Knowing , then , all Truths Speculatively , doe●… not alter the Predominant Affection for Creatures . As the Tree falls , so it lies . 29. Hence , one Enormous Actual Sin , unrepented renders a Separated Soul liable to Eternal Damnation . 30. That the State of Separation does not alter the First Affection of Souls , farther Demonstrated . 31. Hence Sin does not formally consist in the Falsity of the Practical Iudgment , or Affection ; but , in the Disproportion and Inordinateness of it . 32. ' From the former Principles it follows that all those several Kinds of Knowledges we had here , will be Elevated to an Unmeasurable Excess in the State of Separation . 33. Hence also , all the Virtuous Affections , which good Souls had here for Friends , Relations and Acquaintances , will remain in the Next Life ; and make them ardently wish and pray for their Salvation . 34. That each Particular Deduced here , is Demonstrable by the Principles laid formerly : Shown , by repeating those Principles . 35. Wherefore , there is not the least Thought , Word or Action , Good or Bad , which we ever had or did , in this Life , but will have it's Consequent and Proper Effect , Adjusted and Proportion'd to it , in the Next . MEDITATION . The Admirable Nature of a Soul , when separated , and become a Pure Spirit , Display'd . That there is no Comparison between our Soul's Condition here , and That in the State of Separation : Meer Humane Science , when at the Height , was too short and Impotent to raise Mankind to those Dispositions that fit him for True Happiness : The Necessity of Divine Revelation farther shown . That the Christian Life is most Comfortable ; and the Un-Christian Life most full of Anxiety . The Unexpressible Transports of Joy which Holy Souls experience at their first entring into Bliss . CHAP. II. Of the Existence , Essence , Knowledge , Distinction and Action of ANGELS . § . 1. THE Order of the Universe requires that there should be Different Kinds of Beings . 2. And , much more that there should be Pure Acts , or ANGELS . 3. Especially , since the Angelical Natures are Capable of Existing . 4. And , that , otherwise , there could be no Immediate Cause of Motion . 5. As is also demonstrated from the Nature of all Causality . 6. Every more perfect Ens includes in it the Nature of the less-perfect , as it is an Ens. 7. And , therefore Pure Acts or Spirits , Contain in them , the Nature of Body . 8. Which , since it cannot be done by way of Quantity , they must contain them by the way of Knowledge . 9. Therefore the very Natures or Essences of Bodies are in a Spiritual Understanding ; and not Ideas or Similitudes of them only . 10. This Doctrine being grounded on that Logical Maxim , [ All Differences are nothing but More and Less of the Generical Notion ; ] the consideration of that Thesis is recommended to the Reader . 11. This holds equally in a Soul too , when she comes to be a Pure Act. 12. Angels , being Pure Acts , are Immutable . 13. The Distinction of Angels is taken from being More or Less Cognoscitive after their manner . 14. This is not to be understood of the Extent of their Knowledge ; but , of the Intenseness or Penetrativeness of it . 15. Hence , as far as Reason carries us , is taken the Distinction of the Three Hierarchies , and Nine Quires of Angels . 16. The Different Manners by which Angels and Human Souls come to have all their Knowledge . 17. That those Angels have Nobler Essences , whose each Act of Knowledge has for it's Object a Greater portion of the Universe . 18. Which fits them to super-intend the Administration of a Larger Province . 19. How Consonant this is to those passages of Holy Scripture , which speak of such Operations of Angels . 20. An Angel cannot operate upon another Angel , so as to Change it . 21. Wherefore , all it 's External Operations , which work a Change in another thing , can only be upon Bodies . 22. An Angel can thus operate upon Material Beings , or Bodies . 23. That we only intend to evince here the An est of this Operation of an Angel , and not the Manner how it is perform'd . 24. Yet no One Angel has an Unlimited Power to operate thus on All Bodies whatever . 25. An Angel can Move or Change those Bodies which are within the Sphere of it's Activity , in an Imperceptible Time. 26. Hence the wonderful Effects , recorded in Holy Writ to have been done by Angels , are Consonant to Metaphysical Principles . 27. That the Ordinary Ministring Spirits , or Angel-Guardians of Particular Persons , are the Lowest sort of Angels . 28. But the Greater and Weightier Affairs ure manag'd and transacted by Archangels . 29. The Lower Angels receiv'd Intellectual Light from GOD by means of the Superiour ones , in the very Instant they were Created . 30. In what manner the Good Angels perform the Will of their Maker , without New Instructions . 31. That GOD makes use of Holy Angels to procure our Good ; and of Bad ones to afflict and punish Mankind , as His Divine Wisdom sees fitting . MEDITATION . By what means Metaphysicks has rais'd our Thought● above the Sordid Mass of Matter , to contemplat● the Angelical Nature . The surpassing Excellency of their Intellectual Essences Decypher'd . How Faith has antecedently enlighten'd our Reason ; and that 't is our Duty to Explicate and Defend it against the Empty Flourishes of the Drollich Renouncers of Faith and Reason both . What Gratitude , Love and Veneration we owe to those Blessed Ministring Spirits ; and what Benefit we shal● reap by keeping up a Spiritual Communion with them , by following their good Inspirations . Yet , that we ought to honour them so , as to remember they are only our Fellow Servants ; tho' highly Dignify'd by our Common Master . BOOK III. Of the most Pure Actuality of Being , the Adorable DEITY . Of the Existence , Essence , and Attributes of GOD. § . 1. THat there must be Something which is a most Pure Actuality of Being ; Demonstrated . 2. Dem. II. From the acknowledg'd Potentiality of Being ; necessarily annext , or rather Essential to all Creatures . 3. Dem. III. Because what is not , cannot Act. 4. Dem : IV. Because Actual Being ( or Existence ) is the Noblest Effect imaginable . 5. Dem. V. Because no Power can produce an Effect which is Contradictory to what it self is , or , to it 's own Nature . 6. The foresaid Proofs summ'd up in One , and Enforc'd . 7. This Actuality of Being gave Being to all Other Things . 8. The Objection of the Atheists propos'd ; viz. That The World was ever . 9. First Answer . That this does not solve our Demonstration . 10. Second Answer . That 't is a meer Voluntary Assertion ; neither Prov'd ; nor Attempted to be Prov'd ; nor Possible to be Prov'd . 11. Third Answer . Farther shewing , that our Argument is not Toucht ; and Reducing it to an Identical Proposition . 12. Fourth Answer . This Pretence , or Voluntary Assertion , is shown to be an Absolute Impossibility . 13. Fifth Answer . That the putting an Infinite Antecedent Time , ( which , in their Supposition , is absolutely necessary , ) is a plain Contradiction . 14. Sixth Answer . That the very Notion of the word [ Infinite ] apply'd to our case , shews also , that 't is a manifest Contradiction . 15. The putting a Finite Number of Causes , giving Being to one another Circularly , is as Absurd and Contradictory as the former . 16. The Notion of [ Ens ] is different from that of [ Existence ] ; and , consequently [ Essence ] from [ Existence . ] 17. Philosophers must discourse of the First Being , by such Notions as they have . 18. The Notion of [ Existence ] is the most Actual of any we have . 19. And , therefore , the Fittest to express a Pure Actuality of Being ; and given us by GOD himself . 20. Every Abstract word includes comprehensively the Whole Nature of the Form or Act it signifies , without any Limitation . 21. Therefore it 's Limitation either proceeds from the Subject , or from the Causes that Determine it . 22. Wherefore GOD's Essence being EXISTENCE ●● self , is absolutely Unlimited , or Actually Infinite . 23. Therefore GOD is but ONE . 24. Hence Polytheism , or the putting Many Gods , is a most senseless Absurdity , and a plain Contradiction . 25. Hence the Christian Doctrine is DIVINE ; the Dawning of which chaced away that Universal Darkness ; in despite of all Opposition , Humane Power , Wit , or Learning could make . 26 , [ Existence ] is the Whole Perfection of every thing that Exists . 27. Much more , when it is Essential , and actually Infinite . 28. Therefore the Divine Existence , or the DEITY , Includes or Concenters all imaginable Perfections in it's self . 29. Therefore GOD is Infinitely Perfect in all Intellectual and Moral Attributes . 30. Therefore GOD is a Spirit . 31. And no ways Corporeal . 32. Therefore 't is an Indignity to the Divine Nature to apply any such Predicates to Him as belong to Bodies . 33. Hence also He is Immutable . 34. And a Self-Subsistent Being . 35. Also His Essence is most Simple or Uncompounded . 36. And his Duration ETERNAL . 37. Whence it ought not to be Explicated by a Correspondency to our Time. 38. Hence also , GOD is IMMENSE . 39. 'T is highly Derogatory to this Attribute , to explicate it by Commensuration to an Infinite Space . 40. Lastly , the Divine Nature is , of it's self , infinitely Knowable , or Intelligible . 41. Of what comfort this may be to some Humble and Pious Souls . 42. That the Author . confines himself , here , to Metaphysical Mediums . 43. Notwithstanding all that 's said , no Notion or Word we have , is Univocally , ( or in the same Sense ) apply'd to GOD and to Creatures . 44. Wherefore all the Words we use , when we speak of GOD , are , in some sort , Metaphorical . 45. Because each of them signifies some one Notion , or some one Perfection ; whereas the Divine Nature is the Plenitude of All Being , and All Perfections , center'd in One most Simple Formality : 46. Hence even the Names of our Best Virtues , are not , in every regard , properly spoken of GOD. 47. Nor , Omnipotent , Creatour , or such like : All our Language having some Tang of Imperfection Annext to it . 48. Nor yet , Negative Words , as Immense , Infinite , Immaterial , &c. 49. No Priority or Posteriority , either Real , or made by our Reason conceiving some Ground for it in the Thing , can be attributed to GOD. 50. Notwithstanding all these are with some Impropriety spoken of GOD , yet all of them ( but the Last ) are Truly said of Him. 51. The Solid Ground of Mystick Theology . 52. Hence is concluded , that all the Names or Words we have , whether they be Affirmative or Negative , do fall short of reaching the Divine Essence . MEDITATION . How , by considering the Visible Things of this World , we have arriv'd at the Knowledge of the Invisible Things of GOD ; His Essence , and Attributes . That these have been Demonstratively Deduc'd ; and this , with an Evidence beyond that of the Mathematicks . That this will redound to our greater Disadvantage , if we live not accordingly . This Knowledge of GOD obliges us to the Duties following ; viz. Of most Profound Adoration , and Respectful Attention when we address to him in Prayer ; Of a Firm Belief of what he has Reveal'd . Of Endeavouring to dispose our selves to receive farther Influences of His Grace ; and to Hope with Full Assurance that He will most certainly give us all we are Capable or Dispos'd to receive : Of Trembling at his Iustice , if we wilfully break his Commands , or carelesly run on sn Sin : Of Hoping Unwaveringly we shall obtain his Pardon , if we sincerely Repent . Of Resignation , in all sinister Contingencies , to the Infinitely Wise Disposition of His Providence in the Government of His World. Especially , to Love Him , who is our Only Happiness and True Good , as we ought ; both for what He is in Himself , and for what He is to Us. Lastly , to the Duty of Imitating His Holy Moral Attributes ; which is the most Effectual Means to perfect us in all sorts of Virtue . BOOK IV. Of the several OPERATIONS of Things ; and of the Manner ( in common ) how the First Being administers His World. § . 1. ALL Action springs Immediately from the Existence of the Cause . 2. And the Acting in such a Manner , from the Thing 's being of such a Nature . 3. Therefore the Power of Operating thus or thus is refunded into the Essence of the Thing . 4. Therefore all Causality is the Imparting to the Patient somewhat that was , some way or other , in the Agent or the Cause . 5. Hence Motion only Applies the Natural Agent to the Patient . 6. The First Operation among Bodies is DIVISION . 7. The Next Operations are IMPULSE and ATTRACTION . 8. The Reason of which Operations is not to be fetch'd from Physicks , but from Metaphysicks . 9. Nor , in Metaphysicks , from the Matter , or Form. 10. But from the Essence or Nature of the Common Modification of Body , Quantity . 11. This Disputable Point fully Clear'd . 12. Hence is seen , particularly , the Reason of Attraction . 13. Every Impulse , does , at first , Condense ; and every Attraction , at first , does Rarify . 14. All these Operations are either perform'd by Local Motion , or concomitantly with it . 15. All Motion comes , at first , from the Angelical Nature . 16. Every Part of Motion is a New Effect . 17. And therefore it requires a Continual Influx of some Moving Cause . 18. This Moving Cause is some Chief Angel , which Rarefies the Matter in the Solar Bodies . 19. Angels are Pre-mov'd , and Directed by GOD to move Matter , in such a manner as is most sutable to His Eternal Decrees . 20. The First-mov'd Bodies do Determine and Continue the Motion of the Others . 21. Hence Angels , and the Bodies which they move , do , as Second Causes , determine the Individuation of all new-made Bodies . 22. But 't is evidently beyond their Power to give Existence . 23. Which , therefore , is Peculiar to GOD ; 24. As 't is also to Conserve them in Being 25. And to give to a Nobler Essence a Nobler Existence . 26. For the same reason a Spiritual Form will be given to Matter , connaturally Dispos'd for it . 27. The same holds in Supernatural Gifts , which also ( abstracting from Miracle ) are carry'd on by Dispositions . 28. Hence GOD is not the Cause of any Defect ; much less of SIN . 29. That all the foremention'd Sorts of Operations do spring from the Respective ESSENCES . 30. That GOD does All that 's Good , in All ; and ; in what Manner , and by what Means . MEDITATION . That God's Ordinary Providence carries on the Course of Nature by Proper Causes still producing Proper Effects , Demonstrated : And Confirm'd , because , otherwise , Mankind could not possibly have any Science ; nor know how to behave themselves , or what to do in their Practice and ordinary Actions . The same Great Truth Demonstrated a posteriori●… ▪ Hence , the Course of GOD's Workmanship , ( the Fabrick of Nature , ) is Close and Indissoluble . The Epicurean Tenet that the World is Govern'd by CHANCE , shown most Absurd and Senseless . What CHANCE truly is . How Groundlessly some Christian Philosophers , ( the Ideists ) do in part violate this Method of GOD's Ordinary Providence ; Demonstrated . The Witty Folly of Stoical FATALITY confuted and exploded . The Application of this Doctrine to our own Duties . A Rational Explication OF The Mystery of the most Blessed TRINITY . Trans-natural Philosophy : OR , METAPHYSICKS . BOOK I. Of the ESSENCES of Compound Entities . CHAP. I. Of POWER and ACT. 1. ALL Mankind must necessarily have the Notions of POWER and ACT , or know what those Words mean. For , since all Mankind do , in their Common Language , use to say that such a Thing which was not before , can be or exist ; as also that Fire can be made of Wood , that Water can be made Hot , and such like ; and this in innumerable Occasions ; And , 't is Evident , that the word [ can ] does , in those Speeches , signifie the Power to Exist , be made of Wood , be made Hot , &c. and the other words do signify the Acts which answer to those Powers ; and , by reason of which , when they come to have those Acts , they are truly said to be Actually such as the words which correspond to those Powers do import . Also , since all Mankind have in their Minds the Meaning of those Words which themselves do intelligently use ; and the Meaning of any Word i● the same with that which we cali their Noti●● exprest by that Word , which Notion we have in our Minds when we use that Word ; It follows evidently , that All Mankind must necessarily have the Notions of POWER and ACT , o● Know what those Words mean. 2. Hence is gathered that there are three So●●● of Power and Act : For , since we can truly say that such 〈◊〉 Thing , newly generated , was 〈◊〉 and now is ; and 't is most Self evident that could not be which had not a Possibility , or Power to be ; 't is manifest that the Thing had a Possibility , or Power to be ; that i● had a Power to that Act , call'd Existence . Agai● since we see that Thing call'd Wood turn'd in●● that Thing call'd Fire ; we are hence forced 〈◊〉 have the Notion of a Power in the former Thing to become this later Thing ; that is a Power 〈◊〉 the Notion of [ Thing ] or [ Substance : ] which is clearly distinct from the Power to [ Existence ▪ Lastly , since we see that Existent Things , ( v. 〈◊〉 Bodies , ) tho' Unchang'd as to the Notion of Thing , have a Power to be many ways Alter'd or otherwise than they were , either Inwardly or Outwardly ; v. g. to be Bigger , Hot , Related ; as also to Act , or Suffer ; to be in a different Time or Place ; to be Situated , or outwardly Habited thus or thus ; it is no less Evident that there is Another sort of Power in the Thing or Individuum , tho' remaining the same Thing , or Unchang'd as to the Notion of THING , to have those Accidental Acts , or Modes , in it , or else Apply'd to it ; which kind of Power is most Evidently Different from the other two . Wherefore 't is manifest that there are Three sorts of Power . One , which the Whole Thing has to that Act call'd Existence : A Second , which the Thing , according to some Part of it , as it were ( which we call Matter ) has to be Another Thing : A Third , which the Thing Existing has to it 's Accidental Acts , or to the Modes or Manners how it is . 3. The First sort of Power belongs to all Things whatever , but the First Self-existent Being . For , since the very Notion of All Things but the First Self-existent Being , imports that they are such as have not Actual Being or Existence of themselves , or ●…om their own Essence or Nature ; and therefore ( not being able to give it to themselves ) ●…ey must receive it from Another ; and yet 't is no ●…s manifest they could have had Being given them by that Other , or by the First Being ; because they now Actually have it , and a ●…hing cannot actually receive that which it has no Power , or Possibility , to receive ; It follow●… that this Power to have Actual Being or Existence , must belong to all Things which we call Creatures ; that is to all but the First Self-Existent Being . 4. This Power of Existing which belongs t●… to all Creatures is also Essenti●… to them . For , since we cannot have a Formal Notion of Nothing ; nor of a Thing under the precise Notion of Ens , but we must conceiv●… it constituted such by some Formal Cause or other , Proper to it's Nature ; which Form●… Constituent of Ens we call it's Essence ; and Essence speaks something that concerns Be●… one way or other , and involves it in its Signification ; and the Essence of Creatures does n●… include Actual Being in its Notion , because 〈…〉 § . 3. they have it from Another ; it follo●… that the Essence of all Entia or Things whate●… that are Created , or of all Creatures , cons●… meerly in their Potentiality or Power to have Actual Being ; which we call their Possibility . 5. Corollary I. Hence the Proper Definition 〈…〉 Created Ens in Common , 〈…〉 That which has a Power to Ex●… or , That which is Capable Existing . I mean as far as can bear an Exact Definition which I say , because th●… which we use here for a Genus , and whi●… we are forced to use in such very Comm●… Notions , is a Transcendent , and not a Proper Genus , which has always a Notion a Determinate Sense , and is capable to be Divided by more or less of the Generical Notion as by it's Intrinsecal Differences ; neither of which is found in the words [ that which ] which we are necessitated here to put instead of a Genus . 6. This Power to the Act of Existence , which ( as was now shown is Essential to all Created Beings ) consists In this that it's Nature is such that it has no Repugnance , Chimericalnes , or Ground of Contradiction in it's Notion . For , since an [ Impossibility ] and a [ Contradiction ] are in effect the same , and differ only in this that Impossibility regards only the Incapacity any ●…ing has to Exist in re , and Contradiction the ●…capacity it has to exist in the Understanding , because 't is Opposite to the nature of Ens , which is it's Adequate Object . And , since all Effects are Possible to GOD which do not imply a Contradiction ; and those Effects that do so are therefore Impossible to Him , because ( Contradictions and Lies being the Height of Folly ) they are Diametrically Opposite to GOD's Wis●…m , by which they are , ( if at all ) to have existence given them : It follows that the Power which Creatures have to Exist or be Created , ( which we call their Possibility ) consists only in ●…his , that there is no Repugnance , Chimeri●…lnes or Ground of Contradiction in their Natures ; only which renders them Impossible . 7. Hence is seen , why [ UNUM ] is said to be a Property of Ens ; and in what the Unity of every Entity consists . For , since nothing in Common can exist , or ( which is the same ) is an Ens ; but , to be an Ens or Capable of Existing , it must be determinately This ; and , to be determinately This , includes to be Different from all others under the Notion of Ens : Also , since to be No One , signifies to be None ; and therefore to be No One Ens is to be No Ens ; hence , nothing is Capable of Existing ▪ or an Ens unless it is Determinate under the Notion of Ens ; or , not Two Entities but Determinately This , and therefore Distinct under that Notion from all others ; that is , unless it be Indivisum in se and Divisum a quolibet al●… under the precise Notion of Ens ; which is the very Notion of UNUM . 8. The Essences of Things antecedently to their Actual Being or Existence , can only ▪ be in the Divine Intellect ▪ For , since they cannot be themselves Actually , until they have that Act which is the Formal Cause of their Being , viz. Existence , given them ; because a meer Possibility or Power to be , which is all that Creatures have from their own Nature , cannot give or denominate them to be actually : It follows that all the Existence ( nay Possibility of Existence , or Essence ) they have , antecedently to their Being or Existing in Nature , is only in GOD , or in the Divine Understanding . 9. Corollary II. Hence is Demonstrated from the Altissimae Causae , that is , from the Supreme Reasons or Mediums in Metaphysicks , viz. from the Nature of Ens and Unum , that the Cartesians leave no Natural Ens in the World , while they put them to be made up of innumerable Particles of their First Matter , each of which could exist alone independently on the other , and so each of them was an Ens. Whence follows that each Natural Body , it being made up of Many of them , is truly and properly Multa Entia ; that is Divisum in se under the Notion of Ens ; and , consequently , not Unum ; and therefore not an Ens , or a Non-Ens . 10. Corollary III. Hence is Deduced how the Essences of all Things are said to be in the Divine Understanding . By which it cannot be meant , that , as they are in GOD they are so many Actually Distinct Formalities which he views there and contemplates ; for this would put a Formal Dictinction of many Limited Beings in GOD ; and , withall , that , the Object , in some priority , anteceding the Knowledge of it , he owes his Knowledge , in some degree , to the Essences of Creatures . Wherefore , 't is , Literally speaking , no more but that God being Infinitely Wise , and being by His Wisdom to make a World , the best Order of which is to consist of such and such particular Essences put in Actual Being ; hence His Knowledge antecedes both their Essences and Existences , and is terminated in them as the Effects of his Creative Wisdom . Or it may be said that their Essence ( by § . 6. ) consisting in their Possibility of Being ; they are said to be in Him , because he gives Being to nothing but what 's Possible to be and Fit for the Best Order of the World ; and not to what 's Unfitting , Impossible ▪ and Contradictory ; which being the highest strain of Folly , cannot be said o● thought of Infinite Wisdom . 11. Corollary V. Hence also is understood why the Essences of Things are said to be Eternal , viz. ● they are in GOD , in whom is the whole Plenitude ●● Being . For , otherwise , the Essences of all Things , of themselves , and as they are in themselves , ( Bodies especially ) are Mutable ▪ For , since no Body in Nature is Capable of Existence , nor consequently , has any Essence , but Individuals ; and we see many Individual Bodies Corrupted and others Generated of them ; and since we know certainly that the rest of them ( they having ▪ all of them a Power to be Alteril , nay to become Other Things ) are liable to the same fate ; 't is evident that the Essences of all the Individuals in Nature do perish with them ; and that , as in themselves , they are Generable and Corruptible ; that is Temporary , and far from Eternal . Again , since the Essences of Pure Spirits or Angels , they being Created , are Indifferent to Being and Not-Being ; there is no Repugnance , ( however they cannot be Corrupted by the Operation of Natural Causes , as Bodies can ) why , for any thing they have from themselves , they may not cease to be as well as Bodies may . 13. In this Possibility , or Non-Repugnance to Existence , which is Essential to all Creatures , consists also the Metaphysical VERITY of Things . For , since a Contradiction , which is grounded on the Impossibility of the Thing , is the Greatest of Untruths : which put , all we could say concerning any thing may be False : Again , since all we can truly say concerning any Thing must be taken from the Nature of that Thing , ( for otherwise we should discourse ●…ther of Nothing , or of Another Thing , and not of It ; ) and therefore if the Nature of that Thing be Contradictory , Repugnant and Chimerical , all we could say of it must necessarily be False : It follows on the contrary , and for the same reason , that all the Truths we can have , when we Speak or Discourse of any Thing , must be Grounded on it's Possibility or Non-Repugnancy . But we call that the Metaphysical VERITY of a Thing on which is Fundamentally Grounded all the Formal and Particular Truths we have , or can have , concerning that Thing ; Therefore this Possibility , or Non-Repugnancy to Existence , which is found in all Creatures , and is Essential to them , is that in which consists their Metaphysical VERITY . 14. Corollary VI. Hence , the First Formal Truths or Propositions , o● ( which is the same ) our very First Principles , are those which speak the Metaphysical Verity of the Thing , or that it is it's self and no other ; which cannot be exprest otherwise than by Identioal Propositions ; as every Attentive Reflecter , who will attempt to do it any other way , must be forced to acknowledge , 15. Corollary VII . Those First Principles can only be of Two sorts ▪ One of them is taken from the Essence , Nature or Notion of the Thing ; v. g. Every Thing is what it is , A Man is a Man , Quantity is Quantity , Idem est Idem sibi ipsi , Aequal● est aequale sibi , &c. The Other from it ▪ Existence : v. g. What is , is ; 'T is Impossible the same thing should be and not be at once ▪ Existence is Existence ; Self-Existence is Self-Existence , &c. The Use and Necessity of which seemingly Dry and Insignificant Propositions is shown at large in my Method to Science , B. 2. Less . 2. and , in my Solid Philosophy Asserted , Reflexion 19. and more at large in my NON-ULTRA . 15. Cor●ll●ry VIII . Hence also is seen , how ▪ and in what good sense , some Propositions are said to be aeternae Veritatis ; viz. à parte post , ( as the Schools phrase it ) or so that they can never cease to be True. For , since no Proposition can be at all , or any where , but in such Knowing Substances , as working by Abstracted Notions , do frame a Subject and Predicate by conceiving the Thing diversly ; and compounding again those Notions into a Proposition . Also , since this manner of Knowing a Thing by Abstract , Partial and Inadequate Notions can only be found in the Soul of Man , which gleans her Knowledge by piece-meal from various Impressions on the Senses ; and not in Angels , which comprehend the whole Thing at once by Simple Intuition , much less in GOD. Hence , the Soul ( as will be prov'd ) being Immortal , all the Affections or Modes , consistent with her Nature ( as all True Propositions are ) must likewise continue and remain in her for ever ; since neither can there be any reason on the Subject's side , why they should decay or perish : Nor on the Objects , because GOD has unalterably fixt the Essences of Things , from which all True Propositions are taken , and on which they are Grounded . Whence those Propositions must be Eternally True , meaning by those words , à parte post ; nor can they be so , à parte ante , because the Soul , their only Subject , is not such her self . 17. The Second Sort of POWER , which is the Power to the Notion of [ Thing ] as it is found in Nature , must have such an ACT corresponding to it as determines the Power to be This or That Thing in Nature . For , since the Notion of [ Thing ] is very Common , and the Power to be a Thing adds to it still more Indetermination ; and , what 's Common to All , and Indeterminate to Any Thing , cannot particularize , or constitute This or That Thing ; and only This or That Thing , and not Thing in Common , or what 's Indeterminate to every Thing , can exist in Nature : It follows , that either there must be no Particular Bodies in Nature , that is No One Body , or ( which is the same ) No Body at all in the whole World ; or else it must be granted that there must be such an Act corresponding to this Sort of Power , which so determines it as to constitute This or That Body in particular . Which Second Sort of Act is call'd by the Schools the SUBSTANTIAL or ESSENTIAL FORM ; and this Second Sort of Power , which answers to that Act , and is Determin'd by it , is call'd MA●TER . 18. Hence those Things which include in their Natures this Second sort of Power and its correspondent Act , which use to be call'd Matter and Form , are said to be Compounded of them ; because such a kind of Thing involves in it self , and consequently , causes in us , and verifies the Conceptions of somewhat according to which that Thing is Indeterminate , and somewhat according to which it is Determinate under the Notion of Thing or Ens , which two Considerations do comprehend all that can be conceiv'd belonging to the Nature of such a kind of Thing , as to that Notion precisely : which kind of Compound Thing we call a BODY . 19. This Second sort of Power called . [ Matter ] is the sole Ground of all Change and Mutability . For , since whatever Thing is Determinate , is Fixt by that which formally Determines it , to be That Thing it is and no Other ; 't is manifest that from the nature of that Act or Form , which , by Determining the Matter , makes that Thing be what it is , no Change into another can proceed . Wherefore , since ( by § . 17 , 18. ) there can be nothing else Conceivable belonging to such a particular Thing , or Body , but its Power to be such a Thing , and its Act which Determines that Power and formally constitutes it such a Thing , that is , the Matter and the Form ; and from the Act or Form , as far as is on it's part , no Mutability , or Change from what that Act made it , ●…n proceed ; it follows necessarily that all Change and Mutability under the Notion of Thing must proceed from the Power or Matter . Again , since all Accidental Acts , or Modes , do no less , in their way , Determine and Constitute the Thing to be actually such as that Accident is apt to make it , ( or to be after such a Manner ) as well as the Essential Act or Form did Determine and Constitute it to be This Thing and no other Thing ; and that their whole Notion or Nature is terminated in their making it Actually such ; it follows that from those Accidental Acts , or those Modes , precisely , nothing can have any Ground to be Alter'd , or to have Another Mode or Accident . Wherefore , all Change and Mutability , whether Substantial or Accidental , can be refunded into nothing but meerly into the Power , or Matter , as it 's only Ground ▪ 20. Corollary IX . Hence is demonstrated , that if there can be any Pure Acts which have no Power or Matter in them , ( as will be shown hereafter there can ) such a● are Angels and Souls Separated , they must be naturally Immutable , both Substantially and Accidentally . See Method to Science B. 3. L. 7. Thesis 6. and Raillery Defeated from § . 49. to § . 59. 21. The Third sort of Power is that which the Thing● consisting of Matter and Form , and having , over and above , it 's Ultimate Act of Existing , has to the Modes or Accidental Acts belonging to it ; as was mention'd § . 2. and shown particularly in my Method● B. 1. Less . 2. 22. Tho' these Accidental Acts , or Modes , ( a● is shown above Coroll . III. and in my METHOD , B. 1. Less , 4. § . 1 , 2. ) are not Things in the First and Proper signification of the word [ Thing , ] but only in a Secondary Improper and Analogical Sense ; yet they have , notwithstanding , their Improper and Analogie● Essences ; ( as has also every Abstract Notion of ▪ Conception we have of the Thing ) and , consequently , their Nature is sixt to be what it is and no other . Whence they have also their Improper ( but yet Real ) Metaphysical Verity , and First Principles peculiar to their Natures , as well as Things , properly so call'd , or Substances have . So that whoever , in Discoursing of Quantity , ● . g. or Action , makes Quantity ( by consequence ) 〈…〉 to be Quantity , or Action not to be Action , but destroys the nature of those Modes , is as evidently convicted of Contradiction as if he had destroy'd the nature of a Man , or an Animal , or any other Substance ; and had made them , by consequence , not to be what they are , as all False Discoursers do . 23. Hence is clearly seen what is meant by Metaphysical Divisibility and Composition ; and that they are not ●●ch as are found between Thing ●●d Thing in re ; for this kind of Composition and Division would destroy the Unity and Verity of the Thing ; be●…es that such a Composition is Proper to Artificial things , and is contrary to the Constitu●… of Natural Entities ; Natural Composition 〈…〉 was shown , § . 17 , 18. ) being made by the ●…eting of the Matter and Form in one such ●… , or one Body . That Composition and Divisibility then which we call Metaphysical , is of the Parts ( as it were ) of the Thing as it is in ●our Understanding ; or , of the Thing as concelv'd by us thus , and the same Thing as concelv'd by us otherwise . For out of our Conception , or Understanding , there is no Actual Distinction of Matter and Form , of Substance and Accidents , &c. tho' there is Ground in the thing , as it is the Object of our Imperfect pitch of Understanding , not able to comprehend all that may be thought of it at once , why we thus frame Abstract , Partial and Inadequate Conceptions of it , or ( which is the same ) why we thus Divide or Distinguish it . And , hence it comes , that , since there can be no Contradiction , ( nor consequently Impossibility ) unless we ▪ Affirm and Deny in the same Respect ; therefore as there is no Contradiction , in such a case , in our Understanding , because these Respects there are Diverse ; so there is no Impossibility in Nature , but the Thing may be Chang'd , Distinguisht , Acted upon , or Act , according to some of those Respects or Conceptions ; and yet be not-Chang'd , not-Act or Suffer according to others of them ▪ as will be seen by Instances hereafter . 24. Corollary X. This Doctrine , particularly this last Clause , were the words Ens or Substance , Nature , Suppositum , Person , Existence , and Subsistence , exactly Distinguisht , and distinctly understood , will be signally Useful to defeat almost all the Arguments , drawn from Reason , by the Deists ; and if well reflected on , clears many Objection● brought against the B. Trinity , by the Soci●ians , and other Anti-Trinitarians , opposing the Christian Tenet of the Unity of the Divine Nature in Three Persons ; and to confute , ( as far as it impugns that Tenet it self ) that Treatise , Entituled , [ A Letter to the Reverend the Clergy of both Universities , concerning the Trinity and the Athanasian Creed . ] Which tho' it seems to be the utmost Effort of those Parties , and has a very plausible Appearance to those who either are not well skill'd in , or do not well reflect on the Laws of Predication and the Use of Humane Language in parallel Cases ; yet it is easie to show , that that piece of Wit and Fancy is utterly void of Art and good Sense ; and that the Christian Thesis it self , if rightly represented , is perfectly consonant to the Nature of the Subject , ( the DEITY ) and to Right Reason ; and that there is no more show of Contradiction that that most Simple Being should verifie Sending and being Sent , Generating and being Generated , and such like , tho' they be Opposites ; than it is that the same Infinite Being , when GOD knows himself , ( which themselves grant ) should , notwithstanding it 's most perfect Simplicity , verifie that he is the Knower and thing Known ; which are as much Relatively Opposite as are any of the Others . Lastly , it may be shown very evidently , that all the while they oppose the Doctrine of the Trinity , those witty Gentlemen do quite mistake the whole Question , by confounding what the Deity is in it's self , abstracting from any order to our Conceptions , or rather , as it is above our Conceptions , ( according to which consideration we cannot think or speak of it at all ; ) with what GOD is as conceiv'd by us ; or what , as He is the Object of our Understanding , His Infinite Essence obliges us truly to conceive and affirm of Him. All which may perhaps , particularly and at large be shown hereafter . 25. Corol. VI. The same Doctrine clears the Mystery of the Incarnation from the least semblance of Contradiction ; and shows how not only Possible , but consonant to right Reason it is , that the Humanity of our B. Saviour may be Assum'd by the Second Person of the B. Trinity , and yet not be Assum'd by either of the other Persons . As also how that Person may supply to it , or be united to it immediately according to the Subsistence or Personality ; and yet not be thus United to it formally according to it's Nature or Essence . And the same may be said of the same Doctrine in order to some other Revealed Mysteries of Christian Faith , which I here , forbear to mention . 26. Corollary VI. Hence is clearly discern'd ▪ what is the Difference between Logical and Metaphysical ABSTRACTION ; and that Logical Abstraction is of the Generical or Specifical ( that is , of more Common ) Notions from the Inferio●● ones ; which is done by taking from these later that precise Consideration iu which they Agree , leaving out those in which they Disagree ; that is , by taking meerly what belongs to the Genus or Generical Notion ; and leaving out , or Abstracting from the Differences . Whereas Metaphysical Abstraction regards only this , that the Notion , Nature or Essence of the One is not the precise Notion , Nature or Essence of the Other ; or that both the One and the Other are different Respects or Considerations of the Thing ; tho' they do , both of them , stand upon the same Level , and neither of them be Higher or Lower in the way of Predication , or in the Extent of their Notion , than the other . In which later Sense of the word [ Abstraction ] we use to say that our Soul works , or knows things , by Abstract or Inadequate Notions . 27. From what is said above , 't is manifest that there can be no Actual Parts in any Ens whatever ; whether we conceive it under the Notion of Ens ; or of such an Ens , call'd Body ; or , as affected with such an Intrinsecal Mode or Accident , v. g. Quantity , or any of the rest . For , since to Distinguish cannot belong to the Power , ( it being of it self , or of it's own nature , utterly Indistinct or Indetermi●●te ; ) it follows that to Distinguish must properly and only belong to the Act. Wherefore in case those Parts were Distinct Actually , they must have Distinct Acts ; and by consequence , the Power or Subject must be made Distinct by having those Distinct Acts in it ; that is , the Subjects must be More under that Notion . Therefore Unum being the Property of Ens , in what Sense soever the word [ Ens ] be taken , ( as is shown § . 22. ) there would , in that case , be no Unity , nor consequently Entity , under any Notion , left in the World. To explicate this more ●…y , and show it particularly : In case the First ●●rt of Power call'd Ens , and it's Act [ Existence , ] ●●d each of them it 's Proper Act which constitutes a Thing , and so were Two Things , nothing in the World that Exists would be One Thing , ●or consequently , ( Unum being the Property of Ens ) A Thing , or Any Thing . Also , if the Second fort of Power [ Matter , ] and it 's Act or Form that constitutes Body , were Two Things ; there would be no One Thing of that Sort , or no one Body ; and , consequently , there would be No Body in Nature . And , since , ( as will be prov'd hereafter , L. 2. § . 16. ) the Complexion of Accidents is the Essential Form which constitutes Body , were those Accidents Distinct Things from the Matter , and the Matter from them ; or , were they Distinct Things from one another , and , therefore , each of them were Capable of Existing alone , or properly Entia ; there would be no One , or No Individual Body in the World ; but every such Thing would be a Multitude or Many , and perhaps Innumerable . Or , were the Parts that compound Quantity , ( or , which is the same , the Parts of Body as precisely having Quantity in them ) Actually Distinct , as many Schoolmen hold ; then , each of them ( as was lately prov'd ) must have a Distinct Act of that sort to make them Distinct Actually ; whence they would be in that case Diverse Quanta , or Things having divers Quantities in them : Wherefore , it being Demonstrable , that Quantitas est Divisibilis in semper Divisibilia , there could be no Quantum , or Thing of that Kind in the World but would contain many Lesser Quantums in it ; and therefore there could be no One , or No Quantum ; and , consequently , No Thing that had Quantity in it , found in Nature . Add , that those pretended Distinct Actual Parts , must be distinguisht ( by § . 17. ) from others by some Act ▪ and yet most of them could have no Act i● them to Distinguish them from their Comparts ▪ For the Second Power [ Matter , ] has no Act at all in it's Notion to distinguish it actually from it'● Proper Form ; and the Forms themselves , whether Essential or Accidental , are meer Distinguishers ; and have nothing in their Nature or Notion by which they can be said to receive an Act , and , so , become the Thing Distinguished . Wherefore 't is most Demonstrable by Metaphysical Mediums , that there can be no Actual Parts in any Compound whatever . Wherefore , all the Parts they are said to have , ( whether they be Physical or Metaphysical , ) are Potential only ; or ( to speak more properly ) there is nothing but one whole Actual Ens , which has a Power to be divided into Many , either in re , or in intellectu . 28. Corollary VIII . Whence is clearly Demonstrated the reason of that Useful Maxim , [ Actiones & Passiones sunt Suppositorum . ] For that which Acts or Suffers must Actually Bee ; Wherefore , since no Part actually is , but only the Whole ; it follows , that only the Whole or the Suppositum can be said in proper Speech to Act and Suffer and not any Part ; or , ( which is the same ) the Whole according to such a Part. Which agrces perfectly with the Sense and Language of Mankind ; who , if a man strikes another with his Hand upon the Cheek , use to say , [ He struck him , ] where , tho' he [ He ] and [ Him ] signifie the whole Suppositum ; yet they clearly mean that [ He ] according to such a Part only , call'd the Hand , struck him ; and that the Other , according to such a Part , call'd the Cheek , was struck ; and that neither of them did strike , or was struck , according to any other Part. 29. Hence is still more evidently Demonstrated against the Cartesians , that , since they put all the Things in Nature to be made up of the particles of their Three Elements ▪ each of which , seeing it can exist alone , must be an Actually-Distinct Thi●● from all the rest ; they leave nothing in Nature which is truly One Ens ; that is , ( Unum being a Property of Ens ) they leave no Natural E●● in the World , except each of those particles may be thought to be such ; which yet , accordi●● to their Doctrine , cannot be said . For , ●in●● they must admit Diverse Things in Nature call'd Bodies , and those things that Compound an E●● or Unum in Nature , cannot each of them b● an Ens or Unum it self ; Common Sense telling us most evidently , that divers of such Components would make the Compound Multa E●tia , or Divisum in se , under the Notion of Ens ▪ and not an Ens or Unum , which must be Indivisum in se : Hence follows , that , for want of Skill in Metaphysicks , they leave nothing in Nature which is truly One Natural-Body or One Ens ▪ but a kind of Heap or Aggregate of Ma●● ▪ 'T is to no purpose to object the Distinction of Ens Completum and Incompletum ; for every E●● is Compleat under the Notion of Ens , or Thing which is Capable of Existing alone ; as each of those Particles is which they Club into One Ch●merical Ens. Nor can they evade , by saying ▪ that the Entia in Nature are Compounded , and those Particles are Uncompounded , or perfectly Simple : For , since each of those Particles is Distinct from the rest , it must have something in it that ●● common to them all , which we call the Matter ; and also somewhat by which it is Distinguisht from all the other Particles , which we call it's ●ct or Form. Whence follows , that every one of those Particles , even the very least , has all the Composition that can be requir'd to make it ●●uly and properly a Corporeal Ens , or a Body , ●specially since it is Capable of Existing alone , or without needing the help of any other : And therefore , none of those Entities they put to be Compounded of these , is truly an Ens or Unum ; ●u● a Medly or Aggregate of Many Entities ; ●●●t is , 't is Non unum , as being Divisum in se ac●●●ding to the Notion of Ens ; or , which is the ●●me , being a Non Ens or Chimera . 30. Hence is Demonstrated , that ( speaking of ●●dies ) the Proper Constitution ●● Composition belonging to an ●●s or Thing , as such , is that Second Sort of Power and Act. For , ●oth of these bearing in their Notion some Respect to the Thing as it is an Ens ; and , neither of them having in them the Notion of a WHOLE Ens , since neither of them ●●one is Capable of Existing ; it follows , that their Proper Nature is to be PARTS of Ens , ●nd therefore 't is Proper to that Whole Ens to be ●ompounded of Them. Again , since as was lately ●●own , no Natural Ens can be made up of more ●ompleat Entities , each of which have both ●●wer and Act in them ; because in that case , that Compound Ens would be Non-Unum , and therefore Non-Ens ; it follows necessarily , that they must be Compounded of Power and Act ; neither of which singly , or alone , can have that Composition in them , which is requisite to make them such Entia . 31. In the Consistency , Compossibility or Agreeableness of the Act and Power with one another , found in Corporeal Substances , consists the Possibility or Essence of all the Bodies in Nature . For , while the Power is Dsterminable by such an Act , and the Act is Determinative of such a Power , they are connaturally fitted to one another , or apt to be joyn'd in order to Compound an Ens , as Proper Parts to such a Whole . Which frees the Compound from Chimericalness , Repugnancy , and Incompossibility of it's Constituent Parts ; because neither of them is Actually an Ens , and yet they are apt to joyn in one Ens ; whence it becomes Fit for Creative Wisdom to give to such a kind of Compound , Actual Being , or Existence . 32. Hence is clearly Demonstrated , that there ▪ is no Real and Actual Distinction found in any one single Thing whatever in re , but only what is made by the Understanding , or what 's found in the Distinct Notions we frame of it ▪ which springs from the Metaphysical Divisibility of the Thing , or ( which is the same ) from it's Power to ground Different Conceptions in u● ▪ For , since what 's Divisible , is , for that very regard , One ; ( for , were it More , it would be Divided to our hand , and not Divisible ) it follows , that what 's thus Divisible by our Understanding , is necessitated , out of the very Terms to be On● in it's self before our Understanding came to Divide it . Whence 't is evinced most evidently , that before this Operation of our Understanding thus Divided it , by making Different Abstracted Conceptions of it , the Thing ( tho' having it's Matter , Form , Existence , and all it's Accidents in it ) was in it's self , or as it was in Nature , truly One Thing ; or One Ens ; and that all these Particulars , now enumerated , are Nothing but meerly our Different Conceptions , Considerations , or Notions of it ; taking those words objectively ; that is , indeed , the very same Thing it self as diversly conceiv'd , consider'd , or apprehended . So that the Thing gives us the Ground of Verification , and our Understanding the Formal Distinction , exprest by the Abstractive or Distinctive Particle [ as ; ] to answer the signification of which word , nothing is found in the Thing as it is in re , or i● Nature . 33. From what has been Discourst above concerning Power and Act , 't is Demonstrable how many Common Sorts or Kinds of Entia can be in the Universe , or are Possible to be Created . For , since nothing is Capable to have Existence given it but what 's Determinate , that is , This or That ; and the meer Power to be a Thing , ( call'd Matter ) is utterly ●●determinate ; and Act is the Only Determiner of ●●tentiality or Power ; and therefore can also have Determination by Virtue of it's own Nature ; or rather bears Determination in it's very Notion : It follows that there can only be Two Sorts of Things Possible to be Created , viz. Those which are Compounded of Power and Act , that is , of Matter and Form , which we call BODIES ; a●… Pure Acts , which have no Power or Matter i● them , which we call ANGELS , or SPIRITS . 34. Hence 't is inferr'd , that EXISTENCE i● the most Formal , and , consequen●ly , the Ultimate Act of all othe●… whatever ; and all others Pot●●tial in respect of it . For , sin●● it has been shown , § . 3 , 4 , and 5. that the Essences of all Creatures , whether they be P●… Acts , or Compounded of Act and Power , do consist in a Possibility or Power to Exist ; and much more , the Improper Essences of their Accidents ●● Modes , which have of themselves not so much as a Power to exist at all , but by means ●● the Ens or Substance , on which both their Essen●… and Existence does immediately depend ; It follows that Existence is the most Formal and Ultimate Act , as supervening to all Created Essenc●… Imaginable ; and that all other Acts , compar●… to it , are but Potential , or , as it were , Dispositi●● to it . Wherefore when Angels are call'd P●… Acts , 't is to be understood , that they are Pure ●● Free from that Second sort of Power , call'd Matter ▪ notwithstanding which , the Essences of those P●… Acts , are but Potential in respect of that First and Purest Act , EXISTENCE . 35. Corollary VIII . Wherefore [ Existence ] ●● more properly call'd [ Actualit● ] than [ Act ; ] as having no ki●… of Potentiality to any farther Act ; but is the perfect Quintessence ( as it were ) of Act ●● self , without the least Alloy or Mixture o● Power ; as becomes the Immediate Effect of GOD , our Creatour , who is essentially an Infinite Actuality of Being , or ( which is the same ) Self-Existent ; as will be demonstrated hereafter . 36. Wherefore , since it has been Demonstrated , ● . 4. That the very Essence of all Created Beings consists in the meer Possibility or Power to have Existence , and therefore they have not Actual Being from themselves ; it follows , that they must have it from Another ; to whom , consequently , Existence is Essential ; that is , from the First Being , or from GOD. There is therefore a GOD. But of this in my Third Book . ADVERTISEMENT . I desire it may be remarkt once for all , that by the Words Power , Act , Matter , Form , Existence , and the same may be said of all the Words I shall use hereafter through this whole Treatise , ●●r those I have publisht formerly , I do not mean ▪ Idea's ] or [ Similitudes , ] or any other Conceits , found out , or made by my own , or any other Man's Wit or Fancy ; but the very Real Thing it self , ( of which , and not of Similitudes we intend ●● speak , ) conceiv'd by us according to such ●●spects or Considerations Grounded on it , and ●●ly found in it : Without which no Solid Dis●…rse can possibly be made ; as is shown in my ●●THOD , B. 1. L. 1. and is demonstrated at large in my SOLID PHILOSOPHY Asserted , Preliminary First and Second ; and in my other Writings . MEDITATION On the foregoing Chapter . 'T IS time , my Soul , to turn thy Thoughts upon thy self ; and to reflect what Advancement of Knowledge thou hast gain'd by those Easiest , most Common , and most Familiar Notions of POWER and ACT. But first , consider , How Provident thy Generous Maker has been for thee , as soon as then wast deliver'd out of the dark Womb of Nothing ; and how he has assisted and nourisht thee up in thy helpless Infancy . Thy Nature was to be Capable of Knowledge ; and therefore , only Knowledge was the Connatural Food , which could give thee Growth and Strength , and ripen thee to Perfection . How wretched then and miserable hadst thou been , had not He , like a Loving Father , taken care thou shouldst not live perpetually in a Dungeon of Spiritual Darkness and comfortless Ignorance ? To this end ●e planted thee amongst an Infinite Variety of thy Fellow-Creatures , Bodily Substances ; which play'd continually about thee with such Motions as were agreeable to their several Constitutions . These , being the Manufacture of an Infinitely Wise Creatour , could not but retain in them the manifest Prints of the Wisdom of their Divine Artificer ; which made ●●●m fit Instruments to inform thy Empty Understanding , and to instruct thy Rudeness . But , alas ! th●y could not reach or affect thy Nature , which was Spiritual . All their Operations were perform'd by Local Motion ; which being ▪ Quantitative and Divisible , could not be receiv'd in thy Spiritual and Indivisible Essence . This had render'd thee , consider'd according to thy peculiar Nature , ( hadst thou been a Distinct Thing from all Bodies whatever ) Insensible of their smartest Impulses ▪ and Incapable of Knowing any thing by their most vigorous Impressions : Nor hadst thou , as being one of the Lowest Class of Knowing Substances , any Right or Title to have Actual Knowledge Infus'd into thee gratis , at first ; as had thy Elder-Brothers by Creation , th● Angels . In this forlorn condition wast thou found in the First Instant thou camest into this Material World ; viz. only Capable of Knowledge , and utterly Unable , of thy self , to gain any , or help thy self in the least : For a meer Power which was undetermin'd to all , or any Act of Knowledge , could not , alone , enable thee to produce any Particular Act , which is necessarily This , and Determinate . But it belongs to Essential and Infinite Goodness not to leave his poor Indigent Creatures destitute , but to take order they should have ( as far as consists with the best Order of the World ) all the Perfection their Nature is capable to receive . Wherefore His Providence wisely order'd thou shouldst have a Material Compart ▪ link'd so intimately to thee as to Compound with thee One Ens , or Suppositum ; and thence partake of the Actions and Sufferings of one another . By which means , Impressions made by Outward Objects , scattering about their minutest particles , upon some very sensible Part of thy Body ( with which Part thou wast immediately united as the Form with it's proper Matter ) might at the same time aff●… thee also according to thy peculiar Nature , that i● Knowingly ; and imbue thy yet-Ignorant-Understanding Power with Tinctures of their several N●tures . These First Rough-Draughts of Knowledge wer● indeed very Rude , Scanty and L●mited ; being ( as it were ) an Imperfect View of the Things on one side only ; and rather Glances th●● a Full Sight of them ; for they gave thee no more Light at one time , than of some one of those m●ny Respects or Notions the Thing was able to i●-part to thee ; and , withall , being the Immediat● Effects of Objects made of Matter , ( the Parent o● all Undistinctness or Confusion ) they were far fro● Exact . To supply which Defect , and make amen● for this Disadvantage , thy Creatour endow'd th●● with a Faculty of Reflecting ; which enabled th●● to refine , separate , and range into Distinction and Order those Raw and Tumultuary Impressions ; and ▪ moreover , fur●isht thee with a Comparing Power ; which , by Iudging and Discoursing , could Connect and Compound those Narrow Abstracted Notions with one another , and , by Degrees , give thee a Broader Prospect of the Thing ; and , in time , improve thy Knowledge to that pitch which is suteable to thy condition here . The Entire Comprehension of all things being reserv'd to thy Future State , when thou shalt be got out of thy Non-Age , and thy Eagle-sight be no longer blinded with the Screen of thy Body . Do not repine , that thou canst not , at first , readily and fully comprehend any thing , but ar● forced to gain a Distant and Shy Acquaintanc● with them , by those Conceptions of them in part only , which our Dull Senses afforded thee . Not ●he least of them , but , if well husbanded and im●●●v'd , will lead thee to far-distant Truths , and ve●y Large and Strange Discoveries . Thy Reasoning Power had been Useless and in vain , and thou hadst wanted , all the while thou livest here , that Employ●●nt which most properly belongs to a Man , ( thy Reasoning or Discoursing ) had not the World's Governour thus parcell'd out to thy Low Understanding the Book of Creatures . He gives thee at thy Entrance into Nature's School , the First Rudiments ●● Elements , thy Ordinary Notions ; which are , ●s it were , the Letters or Alphabet of all our Knowledge ; with which , like little Children of the Lowest Form , we are first to get Acquaintance . Apply thy self to these at first ; Endeavour to learn their Distinct Characters , and what their Force is ; er● t●●● comest to Spell them into Syllables , by Com●●●nding them into Judgments ; or to put those Syllables together , to make up Entire Words , by ●●●ming Discourses concerning them . Not doubting but that , by this Methodical and Industrious Applic●tion of thy Faculties , thou wilt come at length to read this Book of Creatures currently ; at least as ●uch of it as can concern thee to know in thy Condition here . Think not that even the least of those Elements of Knowledge , ( thy Vulgar and Nature-taught Notions , ) is Barren ●●d Fruitless . Consider , how , by ●●●eriencing , that Bodies work on ●●● Compound or Suppositum , thou ●●●est to know that they actually are ; and therefore , that they had a POWER to be ; as likewise that they had a Power to be Chang'd into others , and to be affected after various Modes or Manners and then reflect , how much Light thou hast gain'● hitherto by Viewing Attentively , and Discoursing consequently , of those most Ordinary and most Obvious Notions , POWER and ACT ; which seem'd at first Sight , so Steril , Insipid and Insignificant . These Two , joyn'd with a few others , already known without Speculation , and fully as Evid●●● as themselves , have demonstrated to thee , How , and What , and Where , our Essence was ere it ha● Existence given it . What are the Essential Part● of all Bodies in Common . Which are the First Principles that fix and rivet all Inferiour Truth● in thy Understanding ; and how the● Descend from the Father of Lights , GOD's Essential Wisdom . They instruct thee , by looking into their Natures , ●● Notions , from whence it is that all Change a●● Mutability proceeds ; a Principle , which draws m●ny Great and Important Truths after it . They sh●● thee clearly , what , and how many , several sorts of Things could possibly have been Created . They inform thee what kind of Division is made by thy Acute Understanding ; which the Subtillest Agents in Nature , tho' assisted by the most Exact Chymical Art , could never have reacht ; and how thou compoundest again those thus-Divided Parts to fram● Iudgments and Discourses . They have given th●● Evident Knowledge , that There are no Actual Parts in any Ens whatever . A Truth most Useful to the Attainment of very many of thy Future Knowledges . They have preserv'd thee from falling into the Precipices of divers F●ndamental Errors , by embracing which Great Wits have miscarry'd . They have , moreover , taught thee how Absolutely Pure that Act call'd EXISTENCE is ; and that it is above the Power of any Created Cause to confer that Soveraign Gift on Themselves , or Others : Which leads thee a fair Step towards the Knowledge of the FIRST BEING ; to know whom perfectly is thy Eternal Happiness . And , are all these Acquisitions worth nothing ? Add , that thou know'st not yet what Multitudes of High and most Important Truths do hitherto lie hid , involv'd in these Few now mention'd ; and in some others , here omitted . All which spring originally from the bare Notions of POWER and ACT , joyn'd with some others Ally'd to them , and Connected with them . Awake then , my Soul , from thy Desponding Leth●rgy , and exert thy Industry by the well-assured Hopes of gaining ●●mense Degrees of Knowledge by Studying and Improving the Vast ●●ock of thy other Notions ; that is , indeed , the Things diversly Conceiv'd by thee , and therefore in thee . It will comfort thy Labour , to find so much Good , and to have reapt such Benefit by Two of them only ; and those two , as it may seem , none of the Fruitfullest . Such Beginnings are Hopeful , and give thee Earnest of a Successful Progress . Only be sure thou ●●st not relinquish the Works made by the Hand of thy All-wise Creatour , in which he has stampt all Natural and Acquir'd Truths ; nor strivest foolishly to Create to thy Self New Things , and New Worlds , by thy own Shallow Wit ; and to ground Truth on the Mock-Creatures , made by thy own Fantastick ●magination . That Faculty was intended to be a Servant to thee , to reach thee the Materials thou ●●st need of . Take heed then that her Brisk and Gay Genius do not make her presume to domineer over her Mistress , or inveigle her to follow her desultory Vagaries . Expect Substantial and Real Truth , no where but in the Things whose Essences the GOD of Truth has made and Establisht ; and then thou mayst be confident thy Iudgments and Discourses will be Well-grounded and Solid , not Airy and Fantastical Imaginations : Which , tho they flatter thee with fine Appearances , counterfeiting Evidence ; will certainly prove most Obscure , leave thee in the dark , and be found to be no more but Airy Bubbles , when thoy come to be graspt by the Strict Hand , or Palma Contracta , of Connected Discourse or Exact Reason . CHAP. II. Of the ESSENCES of Bodies in in Common ; and of the First or Simple Bodies in particular . 1. EVERY Notion that is not Abstract but Concrete , must have some Form , or Formal Cause by which it is constituted such . This is Self-evident ; for we call that a Concrete Notion , which is compounded of the Subject which has such a Form in it , and the Form which is had by it ; and which , by being in it , makes and denominates it to be This Kind of Concrete in particular . 2. Wherefore the Notion of Ens , it being not an Abstract but a Concrete , is constituted by it's ESSENCE , as it 's Form , or Formal Cause , which makes it to be an Ens or Thing . For , since the word [ Essence ] imports somewhat that belongs intrinsically to Being ; and yet is not the Notion of Actual Being , or Existence in Nature ; consequently , it can only signifie a Capacity of Being , or the Form of that which is Capable of Being ; that is , ( by Ch. 1. § . 5. ) of Ens. Wherefore , as that which is White is made Formally such by having that Mode , or Accidental Act , in it call'd Whiteness ; and that which is Round becomes Formally such by having Rotundity in it ; so every Ens or Thing is formally constituted such , by having that Formality in it call'd ESSENCE . 3. The Essences of those Things call'd Pure Acts or Spirits , consists in their Actual Knowledge . For , since , being Pure Acts , they have no Power ●● Matter in them ; their Essence cannot consist in a Power to have what is Natural to them , as Knowledge is ; therefore their Essences must consist in Actual Knowledge of what is due to their Natures to know . Again , if their Essences did consist only in a Power to Know ; it being evident , that whatever is reduced from the State of Potentiality , or Power , to that of Actuality or Act , is intrinsecally Chang'd ; and all Change or Mutability proceeds from Matter , ( as is prov'd , Ch. I. § . 19. ) and Pure Acts are therefore call'd Pure , because they have none of that Power call'd Matter in them ; it follows necessarily , that the Essence of all Intelligences or Intellectual Things , can only consist in Actual Knowledge . 4. Notwithstanding that Actual Knowledge is Essential to Pure Acts , this hinders not but that they have a Potentiality to that First sort of Act call'd Existence , which , ( as is shown ; Ch. 1. § . 3. and 4. ) is Common and Essential to all Creatures . For , since to Know is to have the Thing in it intellectually ; and the Notion of Ens or Thing ( speaking of Created Things ) abstracts from Existence ; it follows that the Knowledge of those Things to which Existence is Accidental , consists with the Power to Existence ; especially , since all Knowledge , even of the Existence of other Things , ( as will be shown , Ch. 6. ) consists in being those Things as Other , or as Distinct from the Knower . Wherefore , tho' Angels , by Actual Knowledge , are those other Things with their Existences intellectually ; yet they being in them as Others , they are still left Indifferent in their proper Natures to exist or not exist . 5. The Essence of Body , or of such an Ens as consists of Matter and Form , is chiefly taken from it's Proper Act , or it's Form. For , since what distinguishes a Thing from , all others , does , consequently make it This , and no Other ; and Matter being of it self perfectly Indeterminate , cannot distinguish or determine a Thing to be of this Kind , much less to be this Individuum ; it follows , that the Essence of all Bodies , and consequently of Body in Common , is chiefly taken from the Form or Act. 6. Yet the Compleat Essence of Body is not only taken from the Form , but also from the Matter , which , together with the Form , compounds the Nature of Body . For , since that constitutes the Notion of that Species of Ens , call'd Body , which distinguishes it essentially from the other Species of Ens , call'd Pure Acts or Spirits ; and the not-being a Pure Act , is that which distinguishes it from those Entities , which are Pure Acts ; and the not-being a Pure Act , does also , out of the force of the very Terms , import , that it has Power or Matter mixt with it : it follows , that Body is essentially distinguisht from Spirit , by it's being compounded of Power and Act , or Matter and Form , and , consequently , not by the Form only . Again , since Essence speaks the Total Form of any Ens , as Humanitas does of Homo , or Petreitas of Peter ; and not meerly that Partial Form , which , with th● other Part , call'd Matter , compounds Body ; it must necessarily import an Act of that whole Compound ; and , consequently , include a respect to to the Matter also , and not to the Form only ; as is evident from the word [ Corporeity ] , which signifies th● Total Form or Essence of Body . 7. Hence Divisible and Indivisible , taken as they signifie Quantitative and Not-Quantitative , are not the Proper Differences which constitute the First Kinds of Ens , [ Body ] and [ Spirit ] ; but the Metaphysical Divisibility and Indivisibility into Matter and Form ; as ( besides the Reasons here given ) is clearly demonstrated in my METHOD to Science , B. 1. Less . 3. § . 4. and 5. In which Lesson , if I do not flatter my self , that most Useful Doctrine of assigning Proper and Intrinsecal Differences , and of Dividing any Genus by such , is more Solidly establisht , and more clearly and largely deliver'd than has been hitherto . The Knowledge of which is so necessary , that , without this , 't is impossible to keep our Notions Distinct , or preserve them from interfering and being confusedly jumbled : which must forcibly , in a high manner , obstruct the Way to that Clear and Distinct Knowledge , call'd SCIENCE . 8. Corollary I. Hence those Philosophers are convicted of a Vast Errour in one of the First Principles of Nature , who make the Essence of their First Body to consist in Nothing but Extension . For , since ( as has been Evidently demonstrated in the place now cited , § . 1. and 2 ▪ ) all Proper and Intrinsecal Differences can be nothing but more or less of the Notion Divided ; if Extension be the Essential Constitutive of that Matter of theirs , which ( it not being pretended to be a Spiritual Substance ) must be some kind of Body ; then Difference in Extension , or more and less of Extension , must essentially constitute Distinct Things under the Notion of Body , or Distinct Bodies : By which Doctrine , no Man living , nor perhaps any Body in Nature , while it continually sends out it's Particles or Effluviums , would be the same Body , or the same Thing , one single moment : Which quite destroys the Stability of Things ; and would alter all or most of the Actions , Comportments , Duties , and even all the Discourse of Mankind ; since , ere they could speak or think of any Thing , it would no longer be the same Thing but Another ; in regard it is perpetually otherwise than it was according to it's Extension , which is , ( as they hold ) it 's Essential Constitutive . Nor will it avail the Cartesians to say , that this holds in every Simple Body , such as are their Three Elements , but not in a Mixt Body . For no Mixt is , according to them , any thing but an Aggr●…gate of Many , and not One Body ; and so the Subject of our Discourse is alter'd ; while we speak of One , they of a Multitude . None of their Mixts being One Thing , as is shown , Ideae Cartesianae Expensae , from Pag. 240. to pag. 248. 9. Corollary II. Hence our Modern Ideists ar●… equally Faulty , while they make the Essence of Body to consist in Extension and Impenetrability , ( which they Nick-name Solidity ; ) for they leave out the Matter as not worth considering , which ▪ ( as was shown , § . 6. ) is part of the Essen●… of Body . Besides , they reflect not th●… those Notions , which are meerly Quantitative , cannot be the Total Form of any En●… nor consequently the Essence of that En● , call'd Body . To show farther the Essential Distinction of Bodies , I advance these following Positions . 10. Every Particular Body in the World is essentially , a Distinct Part of Nature . For , since the whole Complex of Bodies call'd the Universe , or the World , does essentially consist of a Multitude of Things , which are of many Distinct Natures , as of it's Parts ; and their Essence , as they are Parts of Nature , does consist in their compounding or making up this Aggregate or Whole ; and all those Parts are such Things as we call Bodies ; it fol●●ws that every Body in the World is essentially such a [ Thing ] by it's being a Distinct Part in Nature . 11. Wherefore every Body is also essentially ordain'd for some Distinct , Pro●● , and Primary Operation in Nature . For , since the Course of Nature does essentially consist in the Motion of a great Variety of Things , which are Agents and Patients in respect of one another ; and those Things are Bodies ; which , being Distinct in their Individual Essences , must consequently ( every ●hing acting as it is ) have also some distinct O●●●●tion primarily and properly belonging to them , 〈◊〉 proceeding from them ; that is , such as could 〈◊〉 proceed from any other Body : It follows , that ●●●●y Body is essentially ordain'd for some Distinct , Proper and Primary Operation in Nature . 12. Wherefore , whatever fits the Matter for the Performance of this Primary Operation , does essentially constitute such a Thing in Nature or such a Body . For , since the Course of Nature consists in Mo●●●● ▪ carry'd on with that Regu●●●●y ▪ and Exact Order , that ( * every Distinct Thing acting as it is ; that is , after a Distinct but Certain manner , ) Proper Effects should still be produced by Proper Causes ; were there any Body or Part of Nature which had No Effect at all , ( or which comes to the same ) no Proper Effect ; such a Body would be in Vain and Useless , or Good for nothing . Wherefore , since it is imposs●… that Infinite Wisdom , which Created and Gove●… the World , should make any thing that is in v●… and Good for nothing ; it follows , that every Thin●… and every Body in Nature , is constituted such 〈…〉 Part of it , or such a Body by the Aptness it h●… to perform its Proper or Primary Operation ; a●… therefore , whatever fits the Matter for the P●●formance of this Primary Operation , does essentially constitute such a Thing in Nature , or 〈…〉 a Body . 13. Corollary III. Hence is seen in what co●sists the Metaphysical BON●… or GOODNESS of every body , which is one of the Properties of it as it is an Ens 〈…〉 Thing ; viz. That it is Use●… for some Effect or other t●… proceeds from it as 't is such 〈…〉 Ens ; or for such an Operation as is Prope●… and Peculiar to it . Whence those Cartesi●… who deny Bodies to be Causes of any Effect in Nature , no , not so much as Instrument●… ones ; but only to be Occasions , which themselves say , are No Causes ; and , consequently , do put them to have No Operation ; do , by making them Good for Nothing , take away their Metaphysical Bonity ; and , BONUM being a Property of ENS , by consequence , their ENTITY also . Moreover , 14. Every Body in Nature is essentially an Instrument . For , since the Definition of an Instrumental Cause , is that it can no otherwise Act than as it is Acted upon or mov'd by Another ; and no Body can actually move of it 〈…〉 but has only a Power to be mov'd by ano●…r ; because it is far from being a Pure Act , ●…ich is essentially in Act according to it's Nature ; but , having Matter in it , which is a Power 〈…〉 the Notion of Thing , it is a fortiori only Po●…ial in order to it's Operation , which is Subse●…nt to the Notion of Thing . Wherefore every ●…dy is only an Instrument put into Motion ( immediately ) by Angels or Intelligences , which are Pure Acts ; in such a manner as best conduces to ●●complish the Intention of the World 's Supreme ●overnour . 15. The Essential Difference of Body is chiefly 〈…〉 from the Action it is or●…n'd for in Nature , and not 〈…〉 it's Power to be acted on or ●…'d by Another . For , since ●…t which constitutes any Essence 〈…〉 be the most Formal , and ( as it were ) the ●…st Noble consideration found in the Thing : And Act , ( let it be never so imperfect ) is far ●ore Formal and more Noble than the Power which corresponds to that Act : It follows that the Essential Difference constituting Body must chiefly ●…ring from it's Activeness , which belongs to Body 〈…〉 ●t has the nature of Act or Form in it ; and not ●…om it 's Passiveness , or Aptness to be operated upon by others , which it has from the Matter . 16. Those Accidents or Modes which do make a Body fit for it's Primary Operation in Nature , do constirute it 〈…〉 Distinct Body , or , are it 's Essential Form. For , since nothing is requir'd to make one Body essentially distinct from another , but to make 〈…〉 a Distinct Part of the Universe ; and that which makes it a Distinct Agent in Nature , does also make it a Distinct Part of the Universe ; and that which fits it for a Distinct and Peculiar Operation , makes it a Distinct Natural Agent ; and the Modes or Accidents ( as will be shown in 〈…〉 several sorts of Bodies ) make it a Distinct Age●… ▪ It follows , that those Modes or Aocidents th●… make it fit for it's Primary Operation are 〈…〉 Essential Form. 17. The Suppositum or Individual Body must retain that Complexion of Accidents with some Constancy , or fo● some time , according as it's Constitution requires ; and not 〈…〉 transitu only , or by way of continu'd Motion . For , otherwise we could never pitch upon any thing in Nature ▪ so as to be able to say , it is This or That Thing ▪ if it's intrinsecal Constitution were perpetually Fleeting . Besides , a Thing , is that which is Capable of Existence ; and actually has it when it is a Part of Nature ; and Existence has some Steadiness and Permanency in it's Notion : Whereas , in case Individual Bodies did possess those Accidents only in a Transitory Succession , we could never assign any the least time in which it could be said to be This or That Thing at all ; nor ▪ consequently , ( since nothing can exist , which is not either This or That , ) to Be at all . Whence follows , that Accidents are not Entia , or Capable of Existing without any subject : Since the Complexion of those Accidents , which , with the Matter , make the Thing fit for it's Primary Operation , is the Form ; that is , but one part of the ●hing . Besides , they are no more but Modes or Manners , how the Thing is , as all Cartesians hold ; which is consistent , in Sense , with the Doctrine of the Aristotelians , who make them to be Affections or Determinations of the Matter . Now the ●otions of Ens , Res , Substance or Thing , is to be ●…able of Existing ; wherefore that Definition ●…nnot possibly agree to any other Notion ; and , ●…refore , those Modes or Accidents , cannot be 〈…〉 themselves Capable of Existence : Again , how 〈…〉 it conceivable , that the Mode , or Manner , can be ●●thout that of which it is a Mode ? especially , ●…ce in the Definition of every Mode or Accident ▪ the Thing of which it is a Manner , is con●…ated or included . Lastly , If Accidents were ●…ble of Existing alone , or Entia ; then , since ●…ry Body has Many , and some of them Innu●…able such Modes in them , that Ens which has 〈…〉 could not be said to be Unum , nor , consequently an Ens ; which would leave neither any ●nity , nor , by consequence , any Entity in all Nature . 18. No Body can exist in Nature if it have ●o other Form in it but meer Divisibility in Common . For , since ●…thing can exist but what is ●…rminately This or That ; and ●hat is Common to all , is Inde●…minate to every Individuum ; and , therefore , cannot determine it to be This or That in particular : It follows , that Divisibility in Common cannot fit or determine any Body in Nature to Exist . 19. More and Less of Divisibility , which 〈…〉 the Immediate and First Di●…rences of Divisibility in commo● determine it's Notion ; and may consequently , ( taken within som● Determinate Degree ) fit the Matter to recei●● Existence . For , since all that is requisite to ma●…a Thing capable of Existence , is to determ●…it and make it distinct from others ; and m●… and less of Divisibility , ( that is , Rarity and De●…sity ) so they be in some particular Degree , an● belong to their Subjects with some Constancy do make their Subjects thus Distinct from on● another : It follows , that such Rarity and Density may render the Matter capable of Exis●ence . 20. One or two different Modes or Accide●● which are Intrinsecal to the Su●ject , ( so they be determinate● ▪ such , within such a Degree may suffice to make the First an● Simplest Bodies essentially Distinct. For , as it has been prov'd , and will be more amply shown hereafter , that the Complexion of Accidents , which make a Body fit for it's Primary Operation , is the Essential Form to all Mixt Bodies ; of which perhap● ▪ all Nature does now consist : So it is Cons●…nant to Reason , that the Simplest and First Bodies , which , by being such , cannot have such a numerous Complexion in them , should be constituted by some one or a few Modes ; or be distinguisht from other Simple Bodies , by it , and it 's Opposite . 21. Wherefore the Essences of the First and 〈…〉 Simple Bodies of all , which we call the Four Elements , are constituted by the First and most ●●mple Differences of Divisible 〈…〉 or Body in common ; viz. 〈…〉 their being , to a Certain Degree , more and 〈…〉 Divisible ; that is , by their being Rare and ●…se . This is evident from the very Terms ; 〈…〉 these Determine . the Indifferency of the Mat●… ; and distinguish the Subjects from one ano●●er ; and withall suffice to render them Capa●… of performing the Primary ●…ration Proper to them . For * 〈…〉 First Operation in Nature is ●…l Motion or Division , by which Mixt Bodies 〈…〉 consequently all Nature is made : Where●… since Density renders the Dense Body able 〈…〉 divide the Rare one , and Rarity make the ●…re one apt to be divided by the Dense ; they ●●● exactly and perfectly fitted , each in it's Kind , ●o accomplish the Primary Operation in Nature ; which is also theirs : They being as yet consider'd ●t the only Agents and Patients : Add , that Ra●ity and Density are Intrinsecal to them ; as is evi●●nt , because their Notions cannot be thought 〈…〉 belong to any of the Six last Predicaments , ●hich are all Extrinsecal . 22. Corollary IV. Whether those Simplest Bodies do now exist in themselves , or as in their own Nature ; that is , out of the Compounds , or no , is not easie to be demonstrated . What I conceive , is , That Earth , Air and Water , ( which were Created in th●… Beginning of the World , ) did really exi●… Separate , before Motion , which caus'd Mixture , was set on work : Also , that the Degree of Rarity and Density they had at Fir●… was the true Standard of their Nature ; an●… most exactly so proportion'd and fitted ( whe●… that most Active Divider , Fire , call'd 〈…〉 the Scripture [ Light ] was made the first Day , ) as to be mingled variously in such a manner as was perfectly Best for the Forming th●… World , and for carrying on the Series ●…●● it afterwards most connaturally . But I cannot be Positive , that since Motion , and th●… Course of Nature was universally set 〈…〉 playing , the Elements are now found P●… and Unmixt ; by reason of the continu●… turmoil of Bodies pressing ' upon one another ; for this forces them to mingle an●… remingle with one another ; and ( by * the Motions of Pulsus and Tractus ) Thrusting one another before them , or , ( by the continuity of Quantity ) Drawing ▪ them after them , hinders them from preserving steadily any Determinate Degree of Rarity and Density . 23. Corollary V. Hence , 't is farther demonstrated against the New Philosophers , ( as before from the Notion of Quantity , as it i● Extension , so now ) from th● same Quantity as . 't is Divisibility , that 't is impossible anything should Exist , ( as they put their First Matter to have done ) which is neither more nor less Divisible ; that is , neither Rare nor Dense . For , sinee what is in no Degree Divisible , is in no particular Manner , or no way Divisible , and what 's in no manner or no way Divisible , is not Divisible at all ; 't is a plain Contradiction to put it at once to be Divisible , and yet no way ( that neither more nor less , easily or hardly ) Divisible ; that is , to put it to be Divisible , and yet to be neither Rare nor Dense . Again , since in that Supposition , Divisibility must be the Essential Form of that Simple Body they call the First Matter ; and , to be meerly Divisible , and neither more nor less such , or neither Rare nor Dense , is Common to all things that are Divisible ; and what 's Common to All cannot constitute or determine it to be This , or of This Kind ; and ▪ nothing can exist but what 's Determinately This or That : It follows , that either what 's Indeterminate it self must formally make it 's Subject , ( their First Matter ) to be Determinate , which is a Contradiction ; or else their First Matter , tho' remaining still Indeterminate , is capable to exist ; which is equally Impossible . For 't is to be noted , that these Men , neither put Rarity nor Density , ( which are Qualities ) in their First Matter ; but hold that all Modes , but bare Extension , are made by the mingling their Three Elements , after their First Matter was Created and put in Motion . MEDITATION . ANd now , my Soul , let us cast up our Accompt● and compute what Degrees of Knowledge ●● have gain'd while we run over this Second Stage of our Travelling Thoughts . We have gone , indeed , but slowly forwards ; but the smalness of our Advance is recompenced by our making our selves Masters of our Ground every Step we have taken . We have gain'd a Clear Light what Essences are , which puzzles so many Speculaters ; and in what consist the Essences of the two most General Kinds of Things , Body and Spirit We have seen what Dull Lumpish things , All ( eve● the Best of ) Bodies are : which Unthinking and Unelevated Worldlings do so blindly admire ; and that the most Subtil of them , being unable of themselves to stir or move , are but Unwieldy Sluggs in comparison of the Activity of a Subsistent Spirit , which sets them all on work . We have discern'd clearly , that all this Material World is but a vast Shop of Instruments ; which are to be manag'd and wielded regularly and artificially by the Iourneymen of it ▪ ● Great Artificer and First Mover , to bring about hi● Infinitely-Wise Ends. We see that not one , no n●… the very least of them , is Useless and in vain ; b●… that they perform such Operations , and cause such Effects , as are sutable to their respective Natures ▪ and , thence , we come to see the reason why their All ▪ wise Creatour , viewing his Great Workmanship , no● perfectly Form'd and Compleated , did declare , that all things he had made were exceedingly GOOD ; which they could not be , were any of them Useless and Good for nothing . We have discover'd what it is that Determines the Common Matter of the Corporeal Universe ; what shapes the Parts of Matter into Distinct Things , and so sits it for Existence , 〈◊〉 have found how much of Determination suffices ●● make the Simplest Bodies ; which will lead its ●o the Knowledge of what farther Degrees of it are ●●quisite for those which are more and more Mixt , 〈◊〉 Compounded . Lastly , We have avoided many Great Errours about the Primordial Constitution of Entities ; and we know certainly the Terms and Conditions which grounds their Title to Existence , or ●…ders them Capable to be Actually . All this we ●●●e got ; and , yet , contrary to our Acquisitions in 〈◊〉 Material World , we have lost nothing at all ●● getting it . And , which abundantly perfects our Satisfaction , we foresee , by what we have attain'd already , that we have a comfortable Prospect , and are in a fair way of Improving our Growing Stock ; and of making Large Accessions to it , without Ha●arding the least Diminution of it , while we drive ●●● gainful Trade of getting the true Riches of our Mind , Knowledge , or Trafficking for Science . Perhaps , some inconsiderate Readers , who reflect 〈◊〉 , that Knowledge of Truth is the Natural Perfection of their Soul , will think it ●…t worth so much pains ; but will ●…gh at us for drawing our Consequences with such nice care , and ●inning out our Speculations into ●●ch Subtil Threads : They will ask 〈◊〉 , What are we the better for know●… a Few insipid Common Notions ; or the Wiser , for dwelling so long upon them ? But these M●… reflect not what Incredible and most Useful Consequences are Deduced in the Mathematicks , by att●●tive Descants on those three Common Notions 〈◊〉 Length , Breadth and Thickness , variously consider 〈◊〉 If Mathematicians , by considering , studying , 〈◊〉 poring , so many years , on one single Mode or Accid●… of that Ens , call'd Body , ( viz. Quantity , ) arriv●… such wonderful Conclusions ; certainly we may b●… for far more Excellent and more Noble Producti●● by studying the nature of Ens , or of Body in Common ; without which , the other being but a M●… or Manner of it , could have no Being or Entity all ; nor , consequently , any Notion or Intelligibili●● They consider not that all Science , which is a Distinct and Clear Knowledge of Things , must h●… for , it 's Immediate Object , some Abstract Notio● for if it be Complex , or involves more Not●… than one ; we must either take the Complex N●… in pieces , that is , we must make Diverse Abstract Notions of it , and consider each of them apart ; 〈◊〉 else , ( as experience will teach us , if we set our selves to discourse of two Notions at once ) we can●… possibly know either of them Clearly , but only at t●… best , Blindly and Confusedly . Again , they mista●… us , if they think we intended to terminate our Discourse in those Common Notions ; We take them 〈◊〉 in our way , and we are forced to do so , if 〈◊〉 intend to discourse solidly ; as every Man , who kn●… what a Demonstration a priori means , must 〈◊〉 see and acknowledge . Lastly , They reflect not 〈◊〉 the Considering the most Common Notions of 〈◊〉 Thing enlarges the Soul ; and that , tho' those 〈◊〉 Abstract Conceptions be but a very small part , a partial , and very Inadequate Notion of the wh●… Individual Thing ; yet , that Shortness is abundantly re●●mpenced by the Largeness of their Extent . He that knows distinctly the Notion or Nature of Quantity , knows the whole World , and each particular Body in it , as far as they are Quantitative . In like ●…nner , he who has the Exact Knowledge of Ens , ●…nce , Act , Power , &c. knows the whole Crea●… , and every particular part of it , as far as they ●…ve in them what grounds the Notions of Ens , Essence , Power , Act , Divisibility , Composition , &c. ●…t what , is all this , if we add the vast trains of ●lear Consequences , enriching our Mind with Innumerable Truths ; many of which are neer as Universal 〈◊〉 these Notions themselves were . Let us permit 〈◊〉 those Men of Fancy to slubber over their Know●… of things by their Confused Methods of Talking 〈◊〉 random ; and pursue the Way to Science , which Right Nature , and the Rules of Exact Art , have ●…ablisht to our hands . CHAP. III. Of the Essences of Mixt , Vegetable ▪ and Animal Bodies . 1. THere are not in Nature , ( as far as we can judge ) at this time , any perfectly Simp●… Bodies , or Pure Elements . For since , to perfect the Forming of the World at first , it was requisite that there should be a thoro●… Mixture of those Simplest Bodies ▪ or Elements , which were made in the Beginning : And , fin● there are many pregnant Reasons , which are very hard to solve , that at the Flood or Universal Deluge , the whole Body of the Earth , and all it's parts , were still more confusedly blended together with the other Bodies , which were themselves Mixts or rather Demixts before . Again , since it is hard to conceive , ( the Course of Nature , which consists in Motion , still continuing ) how those Simple Bodies should re-gain their Original Purity , and not rather mingle still 〈…〉 and more ; It may , I think , be concluded hence and from what has been alledged , Chap. 2. Cordlary IV. that there are not now in the World an● Pure Elements or Unmixt Bodies . 2. To pursue the Thread of my Discourse : When Two very Minute Bodies , of different Natures , of which one is Rare , the other Dense , do cling together ; which , by being of the smallest size , are not easie to be divided or separated from one another by others , they being too big to come between their parts , and so divide them ; they may be reasonably conceiv'd to constitute a First-Mixt Body . For , since , by their constant Adhesion , they do not Act or Operate as Two , but Conjoyntly , or as One ; 〈…〉 follows that they have a peculiar Modify'd Operation of their own , distinct from that which other of those Elements had produced in case it had existed alone . Wherefore , since every Part 〈…〉 Nature is then a Distinct Thing , when it has a ●…ct Operation ; 't is consequent , that these were at first , or in the beginning , Distinct Entities ; which kind of Things we call Mixt or Compounded ; and , this being the Simplest or Least sort of Mixture , First-Mixt Bodies . 3. Wherefore the Essential Form of those First-Mixt-Bodies , was the Complexion of those two Primary Qualities , Rarity and Density ; since 't is evident , that the having those Two in it , does distinguish them from Simple Bodies or Elements which have but One of them ; that is , ( at that time , ) distinguisht them from all others . 4. Therefore the Essence or Total Form of those First-Mixt Bodies consists of Power and Act ; or in this , that they have Matter in them , Determin'd by such a Form ; viz. by the Complexion of those two Accidents . 5. The next Sort of Mixt Bodies , is , That they have Three , or All , of the Elements in them . For , all Proper and Intrinsecal Differences being nothing but more and less ; and the Elements , having each of them , a Distinct Degree of Rarity or Density in them ; It follows , that these are evidently more-Mixt than the others were , which had but only Two Elements , and their Particular Degrees of Rarity and Density , in their Composition . Whence , 't is easie , by what 's discourst here , § . 4. and 5. to discover in what their Essential ( or Partial ) Form , and their Essence , which is their Total Form , consists . 6. The Next or Third Sort of Mixt Bodies , ( if it be not in some sort the same ) is , when the Compound possesses with some Stability and Constancy , an incomparably greater Proportion of some one of those Elements above the rest . For 't is manifest , that there are in Nature many sorts of those Things which we call Fire , Air , Earth and Water ; in all which , some One of those particular Elements does so much abound , that we cannot well discern , at first Sight , any Mixture of the others ; tho' 't is Evident to our Reflex Thoughts there is ; and even to our Sight , when Art comes to separate them ; tho' our Rude and First Impressions make us commonly give them their Name from the exceedingly - Predominant Element . 7. The Next or Fourth sort of Mixts , which , perhaps , are ( in proper Speech ) the First Sort of Demixt or Decompounded Bodias , is , when they have More or Fewer of the former Sorts of Mixts variously united in them ; whose 〈…〉 is the Complexion of those Qualities , found in those several Mixts . And , their Essence consists in this , that their Matter is Determin'd by the Complexion of those Mixt Accidents ; which giving them , as Constant Agents , the power of Operating thus ; or , after a Distinct Manner from the former ; do , by consequence , principally concur to make them Distinct Parts of Nature ; that is , Distinct Things , or Bodies . I say , principally , for 't is to be observ'd , that ●●st . Many other Accidents , besides those most Intrinsecal ones of Rarity and Density ; ( either Single , or Mingled ) do concur to the Essential Constitution of most Mixts and Demixts . For , since Mixture is made first by the Division of the Simple , and afterwards of First-Mixt-Bodies ; at and Division makes more of One ; the parts of those Divided Bodies ( the ways of Nature's Operation being manifold and various ) must necessarily be Diverse in Number ; and , consequently , ( each Divided part being Determinate ) in Bigness , Figure , and Situation ; which , the Potential parts of the Elements , before Division , ( each of them being Homogeneous or Uniform , ) were not . Whence follows , that most of the Mixt , and all of the Demixt bodies , besides their Different Degrees of Rarity and Density , must also have in them great Variety of the Bulk , Figure and Situation of their Parts : Which , every thing operating as it is , must needs make them operate diversely ; and , consequently , these are parts of their Essential Form ; and therefore , ( their Consistency , or Constancy of being such , suppos'd ) must constitute them Distinct Agents in Nature , of Distinct Bodies . 9. Notwithstanding that these last-named Accidents do thus concur , yet 't is chiefly their Rarity and Density which gives those Mixts and Demixts that Nature in which consists their most Intrinsecal Temperature and Constitution . For , since Rarity and Density are those Primary Qualities , the partaking of which , within some certain Degree , did constitute the Simple Bodies ; and all the Mixt Bodies are essentially compounded of Simple ones ; those two First Qualities must needs be more Intrinsecal to them than are those others which ac●ru'd to them by the Division of Matter ; tho they also concur , each in his way , to determine the Matter , so that the Mixt or Compounds may have Different Operations in Nature , and , thence , become Distinct Things , or Distinct Mixt Bodies . Conformably to what Aristotle asserts , Lib. Physic . 8. Cap. 7. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , &c. Of all the Affections , or Determinations of Matter , Density and Rarity are the Principal , or the Beginning and Origin of all others . 10. Corollary I. Hence all the Followers of Democritus , whether Epioureans , Cartesians , or others , who put no Parts of their Matter to be distinguisht by Rarity and Density , which , as is prov'd , are most Intrinsecal ; and affirm , that they have only in them these two Accidents , Extension and Figure ; the former of which being Common to them all , cannot without wronging clear Reason , distinguish them ; and , the Later of them , it being only the Termination of Quantity , is rather Extrinsecal , or belonging to the Surface of the Bodies : And is evidently impossible to give the Body , which has it , it 's Inward Constitution ; hence , they cannot possibly give any account of the most Intrinsecal or Essential Constitution and Distinction of their Mixts and Demixts ; nor , consequently , of what it is in which the Essence of any particular Body , which must certainly be most Intrinsecal to it , does consist . 11. Of this last sort of Demixts , are all Minerals , Gems , Coral , Clay , Marl , all the several sorts of Earths , and such like . Which are Differenced by the Proportion , Size and Figures of their Rare and Dense particles ; and not a little by the Situation , or Manner of their Texture : Whence they come to be more or less Solid or Compacted , Light , Heavy , Clammy , Friable , Porous , Pellucid , Fusible , Malleable , &c. To treat of which particularly , and reduce them into their Proper Causes , belongs to Physicks or Natural Philosophy . Nor is it very hard to do this , were true Principles of Nature taken up at First , and pursu'd home by Immediate Consequences . 12. The same Accidents , and particularly the Figure and Situation of Parts , give Bodies their different manner of affecting our Senses . For , 't is not hard to show , that all Colour , and it 's several kinds , are chiefly produced by These ; as also , the Qualities of Odoriferous , Stinking , Sweet , Sharp , Sowr , Rough , Smooth Bodies . Tho' Sound , and it's Varieties , spring from the Greater or Lesser Tension , Thickness , or Smart Force of the Instrument that makes the Different Motions of the Air. 13. Corollary II. If the Duration of those Bodies be Transitory and Unconstant in comparison of others that seem of the same sort , they are call'd in a Common Appellation , Imperfect Mixts ; such as are , Winds , Snow , Hail , Smoak , Mists , Meteors , &c. and therefore , wanting that Constancy , ( an Argument of their not being well united ) they are , less properly Entia or Things , than the Perfect Mixts are ; as is shown , Ch. 2. § . 17. And , perhaps , they are no more but Aggregates of more Distinct Bodies lighting together casually ; or approximated to one another , and sticking together , by virtue of some Physical Quality , for some short time ; which is not enough to make those Compounds to be Constant and Distinct Agents in Nature , or Distinct and Perfect Natural Bodies . 14. When the Parts of a Demixt are exexceedingly Different in their several Temperaments ; and withall , One of them ( the Common Causes of the World setting them on work ) is apt to move Another , that Body is said to be LIVING . For , since the Notion of LIFE is A Principle of Self-Motion ; and there are no Actual Parts in any Compound ; ( whence we say , All Actions and Passions are of the Suppositum ; ) it follows , that the Action or Motion of each of those Parts , is the Action or the Motion of the Whole Thing , tho' consider'd particularly according to such a Part of it . Hence , such a Thing , one Part of which moves another , is truly said to move it self , or to be LIVING . 15. The Simplest , Lowest and Ignoblest sort of Living or Self-moving Things , are those which are meer Vegetables : For , since all Proper Differences are more and less of the Generical Notion ; and Life is Self-Motion , that is , One sort of Motion ; and to move Swiftly and Slowly is to move more or less ; it follows , that Vel●city and Tardity are the First Differences of all Motions ; of which , to move it self , is one ; and , consequently , that , to perform their Primary Operation more quickly and more slowly , does essentially distinguish Living Things , as they are Living . Wherefore , since Experience shows , and it will be more clearly manifested hereafter , that Vegetables or Plants do more slowly , and more dully , go about their Primary Operation than other Self-moving Things , v. g. Brutes or Men do : it follows , that those Bodies we call Vegetables or Plants , are the Simplest , Lowest and Ignoblest of Self-moving of Living Things . 16. The Primary Operation of meer Vegetables is to nourish the Compound , For , since ( as any attentive Speculater may observe ) every Thing is ordain'd to preserve it's own Unity and Entity , as much as it can ; this preserving it self is most Natural , and Intrinsecal to it ; and therefore not a Secondary , but it 's Primary Action . Wherefore , those Individual Vegetables , which have a Power in them to concoct their Proper Juice or Sap , and so make it fit Aliment for them , which is the Preserving themselves from Withering or Decay ; must be ordain'd , in the first place , or primarily , to perform this Operation . Especially , since whatever other , or Secondary sorts of Actions they may be Useful for in Nature , will be better accomplish'd by their being first nourisht duly , and as they ought ; which , by perfecting them in Being , does make them more-perfect Agents . 17. Wherefore the Form of Vegetables , is that Complexion of Accidents , as fits the Vegetable for that Operation ; and it 's Essence consists in this , that the Matter of it's Parts has such a Complexion of those Modes or Accidents in it as sits one of them to work upon , or move , another in order to the Nourishment and Preservation of the Whole . 18. Those Living Bodies whose Parts are more●oving-one-another , or with more Velocity , in order to their Primary Operation ; that is , upon the least Excitation from External Causes , are therefore a Higher and Perfecter ●ort of Vegetables , or something more than meer Vegetables . These we call Animal , or Sensitive ; because , upon Impressions on those Parts call'd the Senses , they proceed to Action . 19. The Primary Operation of Animals , is to pursue such Food as is Agreeable ●o their Natures ; as is shown , § . 16. of meer Vegetables : and the reason given there holds equally for both . 20. Whence , that meer Animal is most perfect , that moves it self to acquire such Food as is agreeable to it's Nature ; that is , such as ●akes it's Fancy ( which is the principal Faculty that sets on Work all the rest ) Calm or Indifferent . By which means it becomes applicable to more Motions . Add , that ●●ch Food as is Violent , or extremely distant from 〈◊〉 Constitution , and therefore is disproportion'd to the pitch of it's Nature , does make it's operations deprav'd , and to some degree Preter●●tural ; As we Experience in our selves , when ●e Eat any thing too Hot or too Cold for our Constitution ; which disorders our Tempera●ure , or [ as we use to say ] distempers it , or ●akes us Sick. Note , That we discourse here of what is the Primary Operation of Individual Bodie● ▪ as to themselves . What farther , or more Remote Effects they are intended or order'd for by the Governor of the World , belongs to another Question , and will be treated of towards the End of this Book . ADVERTISEMENT . These Discourses suppose it prov'd th●● Rare and Dense , or more and less Divisible , are the First Differences of Bodies as they are in N●ture , or as they are the Subjects of Natural Operations ; which has been already demonstrated here , Chap. 2. § . 19 , 20 , 21. as also in my Method to Science , Book I. Lesson 5. § . 10 , 11. and Solid Philosophy , Reflexion 17. § . 13 , 14 , 15. MEDITATION . THus we have deduced the First Difference of Bodies from the more and less Divisibility of them , consider'd as givi●g the Ground to all Natural Action , and Passion ; and have found th●● they are of two sorts ; viz. Rare or Dense ; whence also the several Kinds of those First Bodies can only be taken from their having more or less Degrees ( I mean , such as are very distant and notorious ) of those two Primary Qualities ; in which therefore , the Form or Act , which supposing it's Power or Matter ) does chiefly give them their Essence , consists . Moreover , we have shown , how from ACTUAL DIVISION , which is the First Operation in Nature , there naturally and necessarily arise other Modes or Accidents ; viz. the Number , Bigness , Figure and Situation of the several Parts of those First Bodies ; the variety of which , woven together after a different manner , and cohering with some Durableness , does compound all Mixt and Demixt Bodies . We have seen ( in common ) that those Accidents do make them fit to produce their Proper Effects , or to perform their Primary Operation ; which constitutes them Distinct Parts and Agents in Nature ; and , therefore , Distinct Things . Whence follows , That the Complexion of Accidents is ●eally that which we call their Essential or Substantial Form : And that , by this Doctrine , an Intelligible Account is given of those Forms , so much talkt of , and so little understood ; that lame account which the Schools give of them , making them as Obscure as an Occult Faculty ; neither giving any grounded Reason by what Connatural Means they come into the Matter ; how they determine it ultimately for Existence , by making it Distinct from all others , or This and That Individuum ; nor , lastly , how they fit it for some Proper or Primary Operation ; which Considerations are Requisite and Sufficient to give it the Nature or Notion of an Ens or Thing , While we were doing this , we have , at the same time , laid Grounds for the pursuing orderly the Knowledge of Secondary and Sensible Qualities , about which the greatest part of Physicks is employ'd ; and to distinguish the Essences of all Things in the World , under what Sort or Kind soever they are rankt . Which shows , how the Architectonick Science of METAPHYSICKS ( as becomes her Highest Stati●● and Dignity ) does Superintend the Inferiour Science of Physicks , and consequently the rest ; Prescribing them what they are to do , by assigning them their Proper Objects ; as also , by Enlightning them , and Establishing the Truths they deduce , by her most General , most Evident , and most Certain Maxims ; which , tho' they be Deductions in Metaphysicks , are Principles to them . For , her manner of considering the Objects of all other Sciences is far Exa●ted above the Inferiour manners , according to which Subordinate Sciences treat of them ; nor does she regard any Quality , Operation , Bulk , Figure , Motion ; &c. otherwise than under that Soveraign Respect as they c●●duce to constitute and establish the Essences of Thing● by determining the Common Power or Matter to such a Particular Nature as is Different from all others ▪ which makes it Capable of Existing , or an 〈…〉 We have avoided the Precipices of some very Fundemental Errours , highly prejudicial to the Intrinse●● Constirution and Distinction of Essences , and consequently , to the Knowledge of the Things themselves ; without settling well the Grounds of which first , 't is impossible to have true Science of any Thing whatever ; or to know what a Thing is . All this we have endeavoured , and we hope , perform'd by an Immediate and Orderly Connexion of 〈…〉 Natural Notions ; deducing still our Consequences in 〈…〉 Frame so closely compacted , that each Foregoing Knowledge ( setting aside the Corollaries ) naturally leads 〈…〉 the Following ones . A Method Unusual to the Generality of Philosophers ; and yet . so Proper and Effectual to assert and establish Truth ; that , however , ●… may not please such Men and their Readers ; yet it ●●ght not to deter us from pursuing a Way so evidently , of it 's own Nature , Conclusive and Decisive , and withall so Proper to Science ; how lamely soever we travel in it : Whereas Dishevell'd , Ill-knit and Unprincipled Discourses , however Witty and Pleasing to the Dotage of ●●r Fancy , have not the least Semblance of Concluding evidently , or Establishing solidly , any one Truth . In a word , having seen in what consists the Essence of meer Animals , which is part of our selves , we have made way to the Contemplation of our own Nature , which is , ●ver and above , Rational : which therefore ought to challenge from us 〈…〉 most Attentive Reflexion ; that , ●…ng to a Distinct and Clear Knowledge of what i● our true Essence or Nature , and what the Primary Operation for the performance of which the GOD of Nature intended us ; we may not deviate from it ; 〈…〉 labour for our own True Good ; pursue that best●…isht Food , which connaturally nourishes our Soul , in it's way ; and comply with the Best Intentions and End of our Creation . CHAP. IV. Of the Essence of MAN. 1. MAN is One Thing , made up , or Compounded , of a Corporeal and a Spiritual Part which we call BODY and SOUL ▪ For , were the Body and Soul i● Man Two Distinct Things , those Two Things , they being of such Different Natures , could not possibly have any Coalition , nor any kind of Union 〈…〉 as to make up One Compound , more than can 〈…〉 Angel and a Brute : Nor could they be in 〈…〉 Manner , or according to any Mode of which w● have a Notion , cemented together . Not according to that Mode or Accident call'd QUANTITY ; the Unity of which kind of Parts is Continuity ; because the Spiritual Part , the Soul , is not Quantitative , nor can it be thus Continu'd or Joyn'd to the Body . Nor , consequently , according to the Notion of Quality : For , first , Quality supposes t●… Thing , which it Qualifies , already constituted and only superadds some Perfection or Imperfecti●… to it's Nature . Secondly , Because all the Qualities of One of those Parts are Corporeal ones , a●… all the Qualities of the Other Part are Spiritual that is , they are Quantitati●s and Not-Quantitativ● which can no more unite than a Body and a Sp●… could . Nor , according to Relation , or to spe●… more properly , according to the Things themselves , as they are consider'd to be Relata , or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 . : For this Notion is of the Thing it self , as it gives us the Ground or Reason of our Relating or Comparing it to Another in such a Respect ; which presupposes the Things , and is so far from giving us a Ground of conceiving them to be One that it obliges us to conceive them as ( some way or other ) Two ; and , moreover , Relatively Opposite to one another ; and Opposition cannot be the Formal Reason of Unity . And , if we take the word [ Relation ] not Fundamentally , but Formally , for the very Act of Referring ; 't is clearly a Spiritual Mode , peculiarly belonging to One part of Man , ( the Soul ; ) and , therefore , for the Reason lately given , it cannot unite both those Parts together . Nor can they be United according to any of the Four last Predicaments ; for These , ( as is shown in my METHOD ) can only belong to Bodies . Nor lastly , can those Parts , were they Two Things , be United according to Action and Passion , ( in which the Cartesians ●●ce this Union ; ) for these ( besides their being Extrinsecal Considerations ) do most evidently presuppose the Whole Thing , or Suppositum , ( only which Acts o● Suffers ) constituted ; and therefore cannot be the Formal Cause or Reason of constituting that Whole , or Compounding those Parts together ; but are the Exercise of that Essence and 〈…〉 Existence , already Constituted such . It is left ●●en , that those Two Parts can only be United , 〈…〉 make One Compound , according to the First Predicament , or according to the Notion of Ens , Thing , or Substance . But , to be United , or ( which ●…the same ) made One , precisely under the Notion or Respect of Thing , is , out of the force of the very Words , to be One Thing : Therefore this Compound of SOUL and BODY , call'd MAN , is truly and necessarily One Thing . 2. Therefore , the Soul and Body in Man , are only Potential Parts of that Compound ; and neither of them , while in the Compound , is Actual . For , it has been already Demonstrated ( Ch. 1. § . 27. ) that there can be no Actual Parts in any Compound whatever . Moreover , were they Actual while in the Compound , each of them would have it's o●● Act there ; and , consequently , it 's own Essence ▪ and this not only Distinctly from the Other , but Independently of it ; since every Act in the Line of Substance , ( as both these Parts are ) determines the Substance to be This , fits it for Existence , and makes it capable to Subsist alone ; wherefore each of those Parts , when separated , would retain it's Act and Essence ; and exist , or actually remain , such as it was ; whereas 't is manifest , that a Human Body , does not exist , or remain , so much as a Sensitive or Vegetative Thing , but becomes a mee● Dead Carkass . 3. Therefore , neither Part , while in the Compound , can Act or Operate Al●… For , 't is Demonstrable , that [ Wh●… ever Acts must Be Actually ; ] B●… in our case , neither Part Is actua●… but are both of them only Potential , by § . 2. Whe●… fore 't is manifest , that Neither Part can work Al●… but concomitantly with the other ; that is , in all 〈…〉 Operations of Man , as he is Man , 't is the W●… Compound , or that Ens , Thing , Substantia Pri●… or Supp●s●●um , which only can Act , or Oper●… s●nce It only Is actually . 4. Corollary I. Hence is seen on what Evident Ground that most Useful and Solid Maxim , [ Actiones & Passiones sunt Suppositorum , ] ( which all seem to admit , but Few , I fear , duly reflect on , ) is built ; viz. on those most Evident Truths , [ Nothing can Act but what is it self in Act , or Is Actually ; ] or [ Nothing can Act in such a manner , unless it Bee such ] , and [ No Parts in any Compound , singly consider'd , Are Actually . ] With which , notwithstanding , it well consists , that The Whole may act , more chiefly and Peculiarly , according to This Part , than to That ; as we also experience not only in Man , but in every Compound whatever . 5. Corollary II. How Useful this Doctrine is to explicate the Incarnation ; or the Subsistence of Two Natures in One Divine Person , and the Different Operations of Christ , our Saviour , as he is GOD and MAN , will easily appear to Reflecters ; and will more fully be seen , when we shall have occasion to show the Conformity which that Fundamental Article of Christian Faith has to the Principles of True Philosophy . 6. Tho' the Peculiar , and Immediate Form or Act of that Part , call'd , The Seat of Knowledge , be that Spiritual Part we call The Soul ; yet the Act or Form of Man , as he is Man , is the said Spiritual Part , together with that Complexion of Accidents in his Body , which contribute to fit him for his Primary Operation . For , since Man is One Thing ▪ which has in it both a Corporeal and a Spiritual Nature , ( § . 1. ) and every Thing acts as it is ; his Operation peculiar to him as he is Man , must also be Corporeo-Spiritual ; and , consequently , his Total ▪ Form , which constitutes him such an Individual Acter , must likewise partake of both those Natures . 7. Corollary III. Hence , in every Operation of Man ▪ as he is Man , the Operations peculiar to the Soul cannot be produced without the Immediate Concurrence of the Fancy or Imagination ; and by the Remote Assistance of the Complexion of those Accidents by which he is constituted an Animal , and comes to be Imaginative . 8. Corollary IV. Hence every Notion or Conception we have , has a Phantasm accompanying it ; either Simple or Compounded , Lively or Obscure , Express or Confus'd , Proper or Metaphorical . The Distinction or Variety of which is taken from the Different manner of the Action of the Object , the different manner of Reception in that Part call'd The Seat of Knowledge ; or from the Reflexion of the Man himself , framing and ordering those Phantasms as he finds most convenient . 9. Hence , this Total Form which constitutes Man , must also distinguish him from all other sorts of Things ; that is , from all meer Bodies , and from all Pure Spirits , or Angels . For , otherwise , it could not be the Peculiar Act of that Compound ▪ if it did not give him a Distinct Essence from all other Species , or Sorts of Things ; which it could not do , were it either meerly Corporeal , or meerly Spiritual . 10. That which chiefly distinguishes Man essentially , according to his Corporeal Part , from all other Bodies ; is , that he has some such Part in his Body , ( call'd by us ▪ The Seat of Knowledge ) which is a fit Instrument to assist the Soul to work comparatively , by representing divers Distinct Things at once . Which property it has from it's being in the highest manner Sensitive ; so as to be apt to receive the several Impressions with an exact Distinction ; and also to receive , retain , or exhibit More or Many of them , at once . Whence , that Part requires it should have a Spiritual Power in it to work thus Actually ; as is shown , Solid Philosophy Asserted , Preliminary IV. § . 13. to § . 20. That which chiefly Distinguishes him according to his Spiritual Part , is , that That Power , being but a Part of the Compound , or of the Whole Ens , cannot , while it is such , connaturally Act after the Manner of a Pure Spirit ; but Dependently on the Body , and by means of the Impressions on it . Whence , it works by Abstract or Inadequate Notions , and not Comprehensively ; and withall , by observing the Pace of the Body's , or the Fancy's Motion ; which is perform'd leasurely or Successively : Neither of which can agree to a P●… Spirit or an Angel. 11. Corollary V. Hence all Pretence of GOD's voluntary Annexing Knowledge to a Corporeal Being , or to Matter not thus Fitted for it , and therefore not Requiring it , or Connaturally Dispos'd for it , is against GOD's Wise est Administration of the World by Previous and Proper Dispositions . Besides , 't is a pure Voluntary Assertion , without any kind of Ground in Nature , and utterly Unphilosophical ; as is shown , Ideae Cartesianae ▪ Indicatio 3. § . 44 , 45. &c. and Solid Philosophy , Reflexion 20. § . 2 , 3 , 4. 12. Corollary VI. Hence the Mens is not the Man , nor an Actual Part of him , or a Thing ; but a Potential Part only . Nor , consequently , could it receive Impressions of pretended Idea's , or be connaturally affected with them , unless it were Identify'd with the Body : That is , 't is the Suppositum , or the Whole Man that can receive them , tho' peculiarly according to such a Part. 13. Corollary VI. Notwithstanding that Man has evidently a Spiritual Part in him ; yet his Manner of Existing in this State is Formally Corporeal , and only Virtually Spiritual . For , since his Spiritual Operations here do follow the Slow Pace of the Motion of the Fancy , and are not Instantaneous or Simultaneous , as will be shown the Manner of Operating Proper to a Spirit is ; and the Manner of Operating follows , and observes , the Manner of Existing ; 't is Evident , that the Manner of Existing which Man has here , is Corporeal , and not Spiritual . Whence , if we regard Physical , or ( which are built on them ) Logical Considerations , he is such a Body ; and placed directly under the Notion of Corpus : But , if we regard Metaphysical Principles , which Abstract from Motion and Corporeal Considerations , and all the Manners of them ; and consider him precisely under the Notion of Ens ; then , he is consider'd as joyntly constituted of both these Parts ; of which the Spiritual Part , and the aforesaid Complexion of Bodily Accidents , which dispos'd the Matter for such a Form , and clubs to his Primary Operation , is his Formal Act ; and , together with the Matter , does compound that Ens call'd MAN. 14. From what has been deduc'd , Chap. 3. § . 16 , 19. 't is evinced , that the Primary Operation ▪ of Man , as he is Man , is Reasoning , or Discoursing rationally . For , since that is the Primary Operation of all Vegetable and Animal Things , by which they are Conserv'd , Perfected , and Nourish● agreeably to their Respective Natures , so as to attain the Good , or the End , for which they were immediately ordain'd by Nature ; and the Natural Good of Man , is that which improves , betters , and ( as it were ) nourishes his Better part , the Soul ; to which the Body is only Subservient , Subordinate , and a Means to procure and promote it's Good : And , that which most perfects the Soul , which is of an Intellectual Nature , is the Acquiring and Increasing of KNOWLEDGE ; which , during the whose Course of our Lives , is done by Reasoning , or Deducing New Knowledges out of Fore-going ones ; it follows , that Ratiocination or Reasoning i● the Primary and Proper Operation of Man. And , accordingly , we shall find by an easie Reflexion , that , when we arrive at the Knowledge of any New ( especially very concerning ) Objects , by Exact or Evident Reasoning , the Soul finds it's Self Improv'd , Dilated , and Nourisht according to it's Nature , and we use to acknowledge that our Desire , or ( as it were ) Hunger , or Natural Appetite of Truth , is then Satisfy'd . So , that as the Pursuit of Food is the Primary Operation of a meer Animal ; so the Pursuit of Knowledge ( which can only be perform'd by Reasoning ) is the Primary Operation of MAN. 15. Hence follows , that this Knowledge , which gives Nourishment , Growth , and Strength to the Soul , according to her Nature , must be Knowledge of TRUTHS . For , First , Falshoods cannot , in true Speech , be Known , because they are Contrary and Destructive to the nature of ENS , ( which is the Adequate Object of the Understanding ; and has for it's Property , Intelligibility ) and Confound it with Non Ens. Next , all Falshoods , are either Formally or Virtually , Contradictions ; as is shown , Method to Science , B. 3. L●ss . 3. § . 17. Whence , Contradictions cannot Unite to the Knowing Nature of the Soul , or be Receiv'd in it's Judging Power ; but are directly Opposite to her Nature , and ( as it were ) Poison to her ; and therefore cannot nourish or improve her , but tend to pervert and destroy her Spiritually . 16. This Knowledge must also be Evident , or beyond Probability . For , otherwise , 't is not properly Knowledge : Nor can we be truly said to ●…now a thing to bee , if we see it may not bee ; it being against a First Principle ; and a Proof which is no more than Probable , cannot make us see that the Thing may not bee , or necessarily is ; for an Evident Proof can do no more . 17. Corollary VII . Whence , what has but a Probable Proof cannot sink into , or cling to , her Knowing Nature ; or improve and nourish it ; nor so much as be receiv'd in it at all as 't is Knowing ; but as 't is Unknowing , or Ignorant , either of True Principles , or of Right Deduction . 18. Corollary VIII , Hence also what only affects and dilates the Memory , or Fancy , or serves to excite the Passions ; ( as , Skill in Languages , Eloquence , Wit , and such like ; ) is not , properly , Connatural Food for the Knowing Nature of the Soul ; tho' they may be very Useful to express her Knowledge ; or be a Means to gain Knowledge from those Authors who writ in other Languages : Or lastly , For her Recreation ; which is not properly the Food of the Soul , but a kind of Sauce to that Food . 19. Corollary IX . Hence , to endeavour the Promoting the Evident Knowledge of ▪ Truths , especially of those which are of the Highest Concern , is the most Manly , most Noble , and most Universally Beneficial Action that can possibly be perform'd by Man● as having for it's Object the most General Good of MANKIND that can be imagin'd : And which ( if it be of Sacred or Revealed Truths ) has a Direct Tendency to bring him to his Last End , and dispose him for Eternal Happiness . 20. Corollary X. Hence , all Errour , it being ▪ when reduced to it's True and Proper Original , a Contradiction ▪ is a Deprauation of the Soul ; and , if it be such an Errour as is Opposite to those Truths which guide her towards her True Last End , it tends of it's own nature , to ruin and destroy her Spiritually : And , would Actually do so , if the Poison of it were not rebated and render'd Ineffectual by the Antidote of a Sincere and Good Intention ; that is , such a one as springs from some Truth of a High Nature : which , well imprinted , cultivated , and become Practical in that well-meaning Soul , directs and strongly addicts her to the Pursuit of that which is her Chief Good , Eternal Happiness . 21. From what has been Demonstrated , § . 14 ▪ it is Evident , That the Essence of Man , is RATIONALITY , or the Power of Reasoning . For , as was prov'd above , ( Ch. 2. § . 9. 10. and is evident of it self , That is the Essence of every thing from which immediately proceeds the Power to perform it's Primary Operation for which it was ordain'd and made : But , the Act of Reasoning , ( which by § . 14 , is his Primary Operation ) proceeds immediately from the Power of Reasoning ; therefore the Power of Reasoning , or Rationality , ●● the Essence of Man. 22. Moreover , Rationality , does perfectly distinguish Man from all other Sorts of Things , whether they be Bo●…s or Spirits . For Matter , tho' 〈…〉 parts be never so artificially ●…d together , can never make Knowledge ; and therefore no meer Body can ▪ know or Reason . And , it distinguishes him also from all other Sorts of Spiritual Natures ; that is ; from Pure Spirits , or Angels ; in regard , that These having no Matter or Quantity in them , their Operations ●re therefore Unsuccessive or Instantaneous ; because there cannot be Part after Part , ( which is the Notion of Succession ) in that which has no Parts at all . Whereas in the Act of Reasoning , the Whole Suppositum , which has in it both Soul and Body , being that which operates ; hence , every such Act , it being accompany'd with the Act of the Fancy , which is Corporeal , is thence necessitated to be Successive ; both because no Corporeal ▪ Motion can be in an Instant ; as also , because no two Parts of such a Motion can possibly ▪ be together ; for this would make it Unsuccessive . 32. Corollary XI . Hence is demonstrated , That ▪ [ Animal Rationale ] is a True and Proper Definition of Man : Because it both explains , or gives us his True Essence ; and also Distinguishes Mankind from all other Kinds or Sorts of Things . 24. In this Essence of Man , [ Rationality ] are included the Power of Simply Apprehending or Conceiving ; and the Power of Iudging ; especially the Power of Seeing the First Principles to be True and Self ▪ evident . For , since in that Compleat Act of Reasoning , which is Formally o● Equivalently a Syllogism , there are necessarily included Iudgments ; because we cannot hold a Conclusion , Inferr'd by our Reason , to be True , unless we first Iudge the Premisses to be such ; nor , that it follows from those Premisses , unless we Iudge that Identical Proposition , on which is Grounded the Force of the Consequence , to be both True and Self-evident : Again , since in every Iudgment are Included those Notions or Simple Apprehensions , call'd the Subject , Copula , and Predicate ; which are the Immediate Parts of the Proposition we Judge of , and the Remote Materials of all our Discoursings or Reasonings : It follows , that , tho' the Powers of Apprehending and Iudging be not Formally the Power of Reasoning ▪ yet they are Included in it , as Integral Parts constituting it , or Presuppos'd to it . 24. For the same Reason , the Power of Re●…ing the Particles or Effluvi●… emitted from outward Objects , and Transmitting them at ●●rst to the Brain , or the Seat of Knowledge , is a Necessary Requisite , or Previous Disposition , to Rationality . For , since we cannot Discourse without Iudging ; nor Iudge , without Propositions , which are the Objects of Judging ; nor have Propositions in us , without having Simple Apprehensions or Notions ; ●hich are the Parts of a Proposition , of which it ●…sists : Nor , lastly , can we ( as will be prov'd ●…ortly ) have Notions but by Receiving Impressions on the Senses from Outward Objects , and ●…nce on the Brain or Seat of Knowledge ; by affecting which they do , consequently , or after it's manner , affect the Soul , ( which immediately in●…ms that Part and is identify'd with it , ) and thence imbues her with those Notions : It follows , that the Power of Receiving those Particles by the Senses , and transmitting them to the Seat of Knowledge , is a Necessary Prerequisite to Rationality , and an Essential Property of Man. 25. The Power of REFLECTING on our Notions , had at first , by means of the Senses , is also an Essential Property of MAN. For , daily Experience tells us , that Reflexion makes the Notions and Thoughts of all Mankind , in what Business whatever , more Lively and Express ; it preserves Men from Mistakes and Miscarriages ; and makes all their Judgments and Actions Orderly , Steady , and Prudent . Nor , could Men of Art , or Scholars , without Reflexion , ( which , when us'd with a Sedulo●… Application , we call STUDY ) range all their Notions with exact Distinction under Gene●… Heads ; without doing which , all their Discourse might be Confus'd , and Interfere , or Ramble from one Notion to another ; nor could they so firmly ▪ and certainly , hold to the same Point , or to the same Subject of their Discourse . Nor , could they Divide those Notions by Proper Differences , nor Define them right ; much less , lay them together , or Connect them Orderly ; without which 't is manifest , no Evident Ratiocination can 〈…〉 made , nor any True Science be possibly attain'd ▪ 26. 'T is most Connatural to the State of th●… Soul while in the Body , that s●… should Acquire her First Eleme●… of Knowing , or Notions , by mea●… of Bodily Instruments , and 〈…〉 have them Infus'd into her 〈…〉 first , or Innate : This is Evident from divers Considerations . 27. First , Because the Soul had her Being 〈…〉 first , by reason that some part of the Body was Dispos'd , and therefore Naturally Requir'd to have such a Form ; Nor can any other reason be assign'd , why Ordinary Providence , or GOD as he is the Author of Nature , puts a Soul into each Embryo ; much less such a Soul into such an Embryo when it is fit to Receive it . Wherefore , 't is Agreeable to the same Wise Course of Nature , th●… her Operations , which follow her Being , should likewise observe the same method , or depend o●… those Previous Operations or Impressions on the Body , causing such or such Dispositions in it . 28. Secondly , We find in the Body Fit Organs and Instruments to receive those Impressions from Objects , and convey them to the Brain ; which therefore had been Useless and to no End , did they not work that Effect , and convey them thither . 29. Thirdly , Since it has been Demonstrated here , § . 1. that this Compound of Soul and Body , call'd MAN , is ●…e Thing ; and , therefore , that ●…e Soul is primarily , and immediately , Identify'd , 〈…〉 Entitatively United with some Chief Corporeal ●… ; which , by the wise Contrivance of an animal Body , is apt to influence all the rest ; that 〈…〉 to some Part in the Brain , where the Animal ●…ts chiefly reside , and whenee all their Motion begins : It follows necessarily , that as that Corporeal Part is affected after it's manner ; ( that is materially , or as Material things are wrought ●…on by one another ; ) so , the Soul , which makes ●…e Thing with it , as the Form does with the Matter , should also , at the same time , and by the same ●…ns , become affected after it's manner ; that 〈…〉 Spiritually , or , ( to some degree ) Knowingly ; ●… , which is the same , should have Direct Spiri●…l Impressions made upon her : which are those ●e call NOTIONS or Simple Apprehensions ; which ●re the First Rude Draughts , and the Materials of ●ll our Knowledges . 30. Fourthly , We find by Evident Reflexion that when Outward Corpor●… things , that are Sensible , are objected to us , with which 〈…〉 were before Unacquainted , we have immediately New Notions of it : But we do not find by o●… best Reflexion , that any Idea or Notion of suc●… a thing was in us antecedently , and only excited 〈…〉 new . 31. Fifthly , We find also by Evident Reflexion that our Notion ( or Idea ) is D●… and Dull , if the Impression fro●… without do but slightly affect 〈…〉 or imperfectly exhibit the Object . Wherefore , the Degree of Clearness or Obscurity in the I●…pression , does make a correspondent Degree 〈…〉 Clearness or Obscurity in the ( Idea or ) Notion it argues , likewise , that the Substance of the Notion is made by the Substance of the Impression ; a●… consequently , that our Notions themselves 〈…〉 caus'd by Impressions from without , and are 〈…〉 Innate . For , otherwise , since a less Clear Impression might serve to excite this Idea rather tha●… Another ; the Idea in the Soul , having there , ( ●…qually ) it 's Native Brightness , independently on t●… Body ; it would , when once excited , appear 〈…〉 it's full Lustre ; the contrary to which we ●…perience whenever the Impression is Imperfect . 32. Sixthly , The Objects , or Things to be kno●… are without us ; and , by sendi●… out their Effluviums , which 〈…〉 minute particles of the same Nature , are apt to affect our Senses , and to P●…trate , or be Transmitted to , that most Sensi●… part call'd the Seat of Knowledge . Wherefo●… ( as was prov'd ) Man being One Thing ; and , consequently , the Soul being immediately United with the Body as the Form to that Noblest Part ; and , all Passions or Receptions , having for their Subject the Suppositum , or the Whole Compound ; it follows that , when that Part is affected , the Whole , and consequently the Soul , must be affected or wrought upon at the same time . Especially , since the very Essence of Man fundamentally consists in the Substantial Union or Identity in the Notion of Ens of those two Parts . Whence , follows , that every Impression being Receiv'd according to the Manner or Nature of the Receiver ; ●…nd , the Receiver here , consisting of two diversnatur'd Parts , one of which is Corporeal , the other Spiritual ; consequently , when the Corporeal Part is affected after it's manner , or has the Nature of that Object in it Corporeally ; the Spiritual Part , or the Soul , will be affected , or have the Nature of that Object in it Spiritually , that is , Knowingly : Or , which is the same , there will be a Notion or Simple Apprehension of the Nature of that Object directly Imprinted in it , as far as the Sense , or Senses , exhibit that Object . Of which , see Preliminary IV. § . 14 , 15. 33. Seventhly , There being no Actual Parts in any Compound whatever , ( by Ch. 1. § . 27. ) the Condition of the Soul , while 't is a Part of that Compound Thing , MAN , is only Potential ; and far different from that of a Pure Act , or an Angel ; which , because it has no Organs or Means to acquire any New Knowledge from Outward Objects , has , therefore , all the Knowledge , that can be due to it's Nature , given it in the First Instant of it's Being ; that is , all it's Knowledge is Innate . Whereas , the Soul , being h●… in a State of Potentiality ; and , besides , the M●…ner of Existing which she has here , being 〈…〉 some sort Corporeal , ( by § . 13. ) this Potentiality ●…hers is to be reduced to Act , or her Power 〈…〉 Knowing is to be brought to Actual Knowledge by Degrees But , were her Notions Innate , sh●… would have her Knowledge by the same Connatural Way , and after the same Manner , by which Angels have theirs ; which confounds the Nature of those two vastly different Kinds of Being●… MAN , and ANGEL ; contrary to all the Ma●…ims of Sound Philosophy . 34. Lastly , If All the Ideas or Notions be Innat● and there can be no reason why some should be so , and othe● not , since the Soul is equally capable of All as of Some only ; then , since to be Actually in a Knowing Power , is to Actuate or Inform that Power , that is , to render that Power Actually Knowing ; it would follow , that the Sou● in that case , having in her all those Notions of which her Nature is capable , ( that is , All Notions whatever ) she would either know all things while she is here ; or else she would have , while here , Innumerable Ideas or Materials of Knowledge , which never come to be Excited , and so are perfectly Useless . Which makes the Immediate Act of the First Being , which Infus'd them , Frustraneous , and to no purpose . For , their own Principles must force them to confess , those Ideas which shall never be Excited , cannot , in that case , either serve for Reasoning , Contemplation , nor Outward Action ; and therefore the Imbuing the Mind with them here , is Preposterous , Su●…ous , and to no end . 35. 'T is equally Groundless and Unphiloso●…cal , in many regards , to affirm , 〈…〉 the Soul has a Power to Eli●… or Produce such Ideas in her ●… ▪ upon Occasion of such an Im●…ssion made on the Senses . For , ●… , the Reasons given above , I mean those ●…hich have been produced , § . 28 , 29 , 30 , 32. ) ●… ▪ ( in a manner equally ) disprove such Ideas , ●…se which are properly Innate . Secondly , 〈…〉 impossible to show by , their Grounds , any Natural Connexion between that Impression on the ●…ve , and the Production of such or such an 〈…〉 nor , as far as I can see , do they so much 〈…〉 pretend to show how this Effect does , ex na●…a rei , spring from that Cause . For 't is con●… ▪ that the Stroke on the Nerve , and the Idea which starts up when it is made there , are utterly Unlike one another : By which lame account , any kind of Impression , provided it be Unlike , may occasion the Production of any Idea whatever ; and therefore there would be no Reason why 〈…〉 particular Impression , more than another , made 〈…〉 the Body , should concur any way , ( no , not so much as a sutable Occasion ) : to the Production of any particular Idea at all . Thirdly , Hence , they make this Impression on the Nerve to be only an Occasion , that is a kind of Conditio sine quâ non , and not any sort of Cause ; contrary to the whole Intention and End of all Philosophy ; which is to refund Effects into their Proper Causes . Fourthly , They put the Soul , which is of an Indivisible nature , to Act upon it self , and to be the Sole Cause of such an Idea ; which is against divers Principles confining upon Self-evidence , and easily reducible to it . Such as are . [ Nothing that is meerly i● Power to such an Effect can reduce st self to Act. Nothing Indetermin'd can produce a Determinate Effect . Nothing can change it self . An Indivisible Entity cannot work upon it self . A Thing in Rest cannot move it self . ] Or , in a word , the Whole Course of Causes ▪ consisting in this , that One Thing which is in Act it self , is to work upon Another which is in Power to receive that Act , is , by this Extravagant Doctrine , made Needless , Absurd and Incoherent . 36. Corollary XII . From what 's Deduc't above , it follows , that that Position of the Cartesians , which makes the Soul and Body in Man to be Duae Res , or Two Things , does not seem to sute well with Christian Faith. For , since Cartesius does therefore make them Two Things , because he finds them to be of Different Natures ; 't is Evident , that he does not Distinguish between the Notion of the Thing , which has the Nature in it ; and of the Nature , which is in the Thing , or is had by it : Whence follows , that whereever , and whenever , there are those two Distinct Natures , there must also be two Distinct Things : But , the Second Person of the Trinity will ever retain the Humanity of Christ , and the Humanity of Christ will ever consist of the Corporeal and Spiritual Natures call'd Soul and Body ▪ therefore there will ever be , according to this Doctrine , two distinct Things in the Humanity of Christ-Again , since these Two Natures in Christ's Humanity ( which they call Two Things ) are Individually or Numerically such ; and an Individual Thing , is the same as a Suppositum ; the Followers of this Doctrine must hold there are Two Suppositums in Christ , according to his Humanity : Wherefore , since 't is a Fundamental of Christian Faith , that there is also in Christ the Divine Suppositum ; they must be forced to put three Suppositums in Christ ▪ GOD and MAN ; which is strange Language in Christianity . Nor will it avail them to alledge , that the Divine Personality , by Assuming Humane Nature , s●pplies the Subsistence of both those Natures ; for this takes not away the Distinction of the Two Natures in the Humanity ; wherefore , if whereever there are two Natures , there must be Two Things , and those ( in our case ) Individually such ; of force there will remain two Individual Things ; that is ; Two Supposita in Christ's Humane Nature ; and , consequently , Three in all . Whence , since Verum vero non contradicit , the Christian Tenet of but One Suppositum in Christ being True ; the Cartesian Doctrine , that the Soul and Body in Man are two Things , because they are of such Different Natures , must needs be False ; and our main Tenet , that the Soul and Body in Man do make but One Thing , is both Evident to Reason , and Consonant to Faith , and to the Creed of St. Athanasius . 37. Corollary XIII . Hence also it follows from this Thesis of the Cartesians , that every Individual Man in the World is a Perfect Chimera , nay a more Monstrous one than a Hircoceruus , a Centaur , or any other we use to Instance in . For , since all Created Beings are either Pure Acts ▪ or Compounded of Power and Act , that is Matter and Form , by Ch. 1. § . 33. and the Word [ Thing ] signifies , [ What 's Capable of Existing , ] and therefore Two Things must be Capable of Diverse Existences ; and if they exist actually , must actually have Two Existences : It follows , that the Soul and Body , even in this State they have here , must have actually Two Diverse Existences . Again , since their Nature , the one being Corporeal , the other Incorporeal , are far more Distant and more vastly Different than a Goat and a Stag , or any other Natures amongst Bodies ; to clap two such Things , thus actually distinct under the Notion of Thing , and Existing thus Distinct , into One Species call'd MAN , makes all the Individuals under that Species to be Chimerical ; nay greater Chimera's than is a Compound made of any two Things in Nature which are of divers Corporeal Species , and exist actually by distinct Existences ; as a Stone and a Tree , a Horse and an Eagle , a Lizard and a Herring , &c. Nor is at all to purpose , to alledge they are a Compound Thing , for this is contrary to many Evident Truths ; since it has been demonstrated , Ch. 1. § . 27. that there are no Actual Parts in any Compound whatever : Nor can the Parts of Ens joyn to make One Thing otherwise than as one of them is Determinable , Potential , or has the Notion of Matter ; the other Determinative of the Other , as it 's Form : Lastly , that Unum , or One Thing , would be Divisum in se , which is against the Nature of Ens. Nor is it to purpose to alledge they are United by their Acting together ; for this only makes them Coacters , ( such as the Principal Cause and the Instrument uses to be ) and not One Thing ; as is clearly shown , Preliminary V. § . 25. Besides , they must Be One Thing ere they can Act as One Thing ; which ( as is there shown ) makes the alledging this for a Reason , very Preposterous . 38. Corollary XIV . From what 's deduced above 't is demonstrated against that every-way-Groundless Opinion of the Pre-existence of Souls . Since , the Form of an Ens being but a Part of that thing it belongs to , and a Part of a Thing not being the Thing it self , or the Whole Thing ; and only the Thing it self being Capable of Existance ; the Soul , which is the Form of Man , cannot possibly exist till it informs the Matter ; and , with it , makes up that Thing call'd Man. 39. Corollary XV. Hence that foppish Opinion of the Transmigration of Souls is confuted . Since , the Form is not Received but in Matter fitted to receive it , or Dispos'd for it ; and , with it , compounding one Thing which shall have a Primary Operation sutable to the Nature of such a Compound ; which kind of Disposition can no where be found but in Humane Bodies ; otherwise , every meer Animal , and Vegetable , might require , and therefore have a Rational Soul , in them ; which put , there could neither need any Transmigration ; nor could it be , without having two Souls in one Body , or Two Forms in the same Matter , which would make every such Compound a CHIMERA . Whence , I am forced to declare , that those who talk of GOD's Annexing Reason to the Matter of a Brute , bid fair for the Tenet of a Pythagorean Transmigration ; for , to what other end can the starting such a Question , or such a wild Supposition tend ? 40. Corollary XVI . Hence is farther shown , that to those who ask , How the Soul and Body come to be United ? The properest Answer is , They were never DISUNITED , or TWO . A farther reason , how they come to be One may be gather'd out of the following Meditation . MEDITATION . BY this time , my Soul , we have rais'd our selves by immediate Steps , from the Material World , our Underling and God's Footstool , till we are come within Ken of our own Nature . Nor can we think we have err'd in that Noble and Necessary Quest : There have been no Meandrian Turnings and Windings in our Rational Progress , which is the Way we have taken . We started first from the Simplest and ( as we may say ) Embryo-Notions of POWER and ACT , which belong to every Created Being . We proceeded next to that sort of Power and Act , which compounds the Changeable Nature of BODY . We went on to take a view of the Essences of the most Uncompounded Bodies , and those of their Simpler Mixts and Demixts , till we arriv'd at those most Compounded ones which are Organical ; such as are Vegetables and Animals ; divers Parts of which seem to have distinct Natures and Operations of their own : But they only seem to have them ; for out of the Compound , they can perform no such Operations at all ; because those Parts being only Potential , or in Power to be Things , they are hence , of themselves , not Actually Things , nor capable of Being ; nor consequently , of Acting . So that 't is the Compound only that Acts according to such a Part , which is somewhat of it ; because it only Is , or is in Act. Lastly , We have shewn the Establishment of the Essence of an Animal ; and that its Primary Operation , for which it was ordain'd , is ( like it self ) meerly Sensitive or Material . But must the Climax of BEING , stop in that lowest Degree of Entity , Base Matter ? No surely . For , how should the Alpha of all Being be the Omega of it too , if there were nothing Created here but such a Stupid and Senseless Nature as Body ; which is utterly unable to ascend to him , or raise it self towards him , and chuse him for its Last End , and Final Good ; And yet , how should meer Matter rise to that vastly higher Story of Being , call'd Spiritual ; or , how should it arrive to a next Neighbourhood with an Angel ? They seem rather Contradictory , and in the highest manner Opposite . The one is of its own Nature Divifible , the other Indivisible . The one is a Pure Act , the other is meerly Potential , being made of Matter , which depresses it's Compart , while here , to a Potential State also . The Order of Beings , which is the Product of God's Creative Wisdom , could not but be contriv'd with all the Beauty of the most exact Harmony ; which consists in fitting one Thing to another . It must then arise by Immediate Degrees , otherwise it would not be Compacted but Shatter'd ▪ And , it had been too great a Leap , and had left too wide a Chasm in the Frame of the Creation , to ascend , or rather skip from meer Matter to a Pure Spirit , But what cannot Infinite Wisdom contrive , without either perverting or straining the Proportions of Order , or Violating the Natures of Body , or Spirit either ? Wherefore to make the Contexture of Beings Close and not intersticed by Flaws , Gaps , or Incoherences ; Divine Providence , which disposes all things sweetly , order'd there should be some Dispositions in Matter , which requir'd to be indu'd with such a Form as was beyond the Power of Matter to produce , 〈◊〉 have educed out of it ; viz. Such as was of a Spiritual Nature , tho' of the lowest size ; to perform with its Assistance , Operations beyond the Power of Matter to compass alone ; that is , with a Faculty of Reasoning , which partakes , in some sort , ●●th Natures ; or , with a Power both of Knowing , 〈◊〉 also of Succession in Acquiring , or Using that Knowledge . Those Dispositions being laid in Matter , 〈◊〉 ●●llow'd necessarily that a Form of a Spiritual Na●●re would be in it : For , to an Infinite Being , stream●…enerously his Gifts from his Exuberant Source of ●…ss , there needs no more to receive , and have , the Effects of his Bounty , but to be Dispos'd for them , or naturally Require them ; especially , when that Disposition , or Requiringness of a farther Perfection was laid by Himself . He saw that to link Matter to a Spiritual Nature Orderly and Connaturally , it was Requisite the Former should be rais'd to its Highest Pitch of Perfection ; and the Later deprest , while ●ere , below what was due to a Pure Spirit ; that so the Supremum Infimi ( as was fit to build up Methodically the great Work of the Creation , ) might immediately confine upon , and thence be joyn'd to the Inflmum Supremi . He contriv'd then that some Part of the Brain , which was the Quintessence and Flower of Animality , ( call'd by us , The Seat of Knowledge ) should be capable of serving for a more excellent Operation than Matter alone could perform ; that so it might become his Wisdom and Goodness , as he is Author of Nature , to endow it with a Nobler Form than the Heard of other Animals could deserve ; and thence produce that more Elevated Operation . I say , as Author of Nature . For , as the Matter of Wood , ultimately Dispos'd by increasing Degrees of Glowing Heat to become Fire , not only has given it the Form which makes it such an Element , or such a determinate Thing ; but also , at the same instant , by the steady and ever ready Emanation of God's superabundant Goodness , it has an Existence given it , though this latter Effect exceeds the Power of all Creatures together to bestow it : So , in the same manner , as soon as the said Dispositions in the Brain of an Embryo are grown up to their due Perfection ; the same Goodness , and for the same Reason , infuses into it a Rational Soul , though it was beyond the Power of all Natural Agents to produce it . Thus came we into this Material World. Thus were we compounded of the Top of Corporeal Nature , and the Bottom or Lowest Size of the Spiritual ; Minuisti cum paulo minùs ab Angelis . Thus was Man constituted the Horizon of the two Opposite Hemispheres of Meer Matter , and Pure Spirits ; confining upon , and by Nature neer Akin to both . Whence he becomes capable to Ascend to , and even ●● Transcend , the Dignity of the Highest Angels ; or to be Debas'd below the Vilenes of the most contemptible Brute . Nothing is so High , but , through God's Assistance , we may not aspire to ; nor any thing so Low and Filthy into which we may not plunge our selves ; according as we follow the Conduct of Angelical Reason , or Brutish Passion . Let us then , my Soul , know our own Dignity ; but yet , let us not overween . Matter is indeed , in us , exalted and superindu'd with a Spiritul Power ; yet we are , for all that , at present , but a Part of this Material World ; and our Condition , while here , is ( at least , at first ) meerly Passive , and ever subject to Change and Alteration . Thy self art liable to receive Impressions from Natural Agents : Nor is this intended by thy Creator to debase thee and keep thee down , but to improve , and perfect thee . Thou hadst no Title , being but a Part , to be a Subsistent Knowing Thing , considering thee in thy single self ; and therefore , couldst not claim to have Actual Knowledge given thee at thy Creation : Thou art then to acquire it by the Operations of our Fellow-Creatures , or rather Useful Servants , Bodies ; which play about us perpetually , and by their subtillest Particles , which they perpetually send forth , affect our Senses . We had our Being at first by Bodily Dispositions ; and therefore 't is no Disparagement to us , by the same means , to have those Materials , which give and continue to us our Operations . Let us not listen then to those Mistakers , who would perswade us that we are Two Things , while we are here . Such Conceits spring from Fancy unable to reach the true Nature of Unity and Entity ▪ The Notion of Ens comprises in its spacious Extent , both Corporeal and Spiritual Nature ; wherefore there is Room enough , in that Comprehensive Conception , to comprise both Natures in One Thing ; provided those Parts can be Adapted and Fitted , to make up One Compound , as we have seen they are . Let us ask all Nature , and our own Thoughts reflecting upon it ; and they will tell us this is done by the Proportion and Sutableness the one Part of an Ens has to the other , as Power , and Act , or Matter and Form ; which are the Proper Parts of all Things here below ; that is , by the Capacity which the Material , Potential and Indetermin'd Part has to be Determin'd or Actuated by the Form ; and ▪ the Correspondent Virtue , which the Form , or Act , has to Actuate and Determine the Matter , when 't is fitly dispos'd for it . By which Determination it becomes This and no other , in which consists its Unity ; whence it is made capable of receiving Existence ; which is the same as to make them One THING . Consider what innumrrable Errors have spawn'd from the Ignorance of this one Great Truth , which gives us the right Knowledge of our selves . First ▪ Those Men fancy thee to be a kind of Distinct Spiritual Thing ; whence , since thou art Individually such , and the very Notion of an Individual Thing , is [ What is capable to Exist ] they must attribute to thee the having a Peculiar Existence of thy own ; whence , thou canst not , by this Tenet , be the Form of thy own , or of any Body , but an Assistant , or Extrin●●cal Form ; that is a Subsistent Spirit , or an Angel ▪ Next , because they cannot conceive how an Operation of Body , which is Divisible , should be receiv'd in an Indivisible Subject , they are forced to deny that any Impression from outward Objects convey'd by our Senses to the Brain , can affect thee , or give thee Knowledge ; and , therefore , they make those Necessary Assistants , assign'd thee by Nature , nay , our own Inferiour Faculties too , to be altogether Useless for th●● End. Hence , they will needs endow thee with 〈◊〉 Power to give thy self Knowledge , by thy producing ▪ within thy self , little Spiritual Mirrours , call 〈◊〉 Ideas : Not reflecting that whatever is of its self only a Power to have any Thing or Mode , or has only a Power of Knowing , cannot possibly reduce its self t● Act , or give its self what it has not ; and that , what 's Indetermin'd to every particular Mode , cannot of it self produce Determinate ones : Since from meer Indifferency to all , no One particular Effect can proceed . For this Reason , finding no Similitude or Resemblance between those Spiritual Effects and Corporeal Causes , they substitute , instead of such Causes , Stupid and Unactive Occasions , which have no Influence or Causality at all ; by which means they break ●●●●der the Chain of Causes and Effects ; by which the well-compacted Frame of Nature hangs together , and the steady Course of God's Ordinary ▪ Providence At●●git a fine usque ad finem fortiter , & dispon●t om●… suaviter : Not considering also that this closely●… Order of Causes and Effects is that which gives Consistency and Coherence to all our Discourses , and 〈◊〉 the only Ground of all Demonstration ; and , cons●●●●ently , of all the Science Mankind has , or can 〈◊〉 . Whence also it comes that , puzzled with their 〈◊〉 ill-lay'd Principles how to find any Contexture between those Natural Effects and Causes , they are given to have frequent , and in a manner constant recourse to the Gratuitous Pretence that God Wills This or That ; without so much as attempting to Demonstrate that God does indeed Will such particular ●…ects , or showing any Necessity why he should do 〈◊〉 or that it becomes God's Wisdom , in the ordina●… Administration of Nature , to set aside the Opera●●●●s of Second Causes , for which they are Essentially Ordain'd ; and , at every turn , to act Immediately by Himself . These , and many other most absurd Doctrines ( every great Errour being Fruit●… of False Consequences ) they are thrown upon through their not reflecting on this Grand Truth , that Man being One Thing , consisting of a Corporeal and Spiritual Compart , hence ( as was said ) the Impressions sent from Outward Objects by means of the Senses to that Material , most Sensitive , and most Noble Part of the Brain , ( where the Fancy resides ) call'd , The Seat of Knowledge , which Part is immediately Inform'd by the Soul ; do , by reason that the Soul and Body , as Matter and Form , make ●p One Thing , affect also the said Form or Soul , at the same time , after her manner , or according to her Nature ; ( that is , to some Degree Knowingly ; ) by Imprinting or Stamping upon her Direct Conceptions , Notions , or Simple Apprehensions of somewhat , or some Mode of the Thing : On which fast Rudiments of Knowledge , duly reflected on , well Distinguish'd , and aptly Connected by our Discoursing Faculty all our Science is built . What other Important Truths occur in this Chapter , affording matter for our farther Contemplation , is les● to our more leisurely Consideration , CHAP. V. Of the Constitution and Dissolution of Individual Bodies . 1. HItherto , of the Constituting the Generical and Specifical Kinds of Bodies ; which , they being but Common , that is Partial or Inadequate , Notions of Ens or Thing , are therefore no otherwise Entia , but only in a Secondary and Improper Sense of that word , or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , as Aristotle calls them ; because , regarding them under this Common and Abstracted consideration , they are not Capable of Existing , which is the Definition of Ens. We come next to treat of INDIVIDUAL Entities , call'd , 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ; that is , Primarily and Properly Substances or Things ; because , consisting of Matter ultimately Determin'd to such and such Particulars , they only , ( as being Wholes , or Intire Things , ) are of themselves , or by the merits of their own Notion , Capable of Existing , or Entia : Whereas the Former are not at all THINGS , but as they are Metaphysical Parts of the Things truly so call'd ; abstracted from one another , by our conceiving them singly , or aparted from their Fellow-parts ; and therefore , ( since the Parts cannot exist out of the Whole ) they are Incapable of Existing but in these Later , and by virtue of Them. Wherefore , 2. Hence follows , that the Generical and Specifical Essences , of which we have hitherto treated , are not properly ESSENCES , in the First and Primary Acceptation of that word . For , since the Notion of Ens , is properly , That which is Capable of Existing ; and Essence is that which properly constitutes Ens ; it follows , that That which does not constitute it's Subject Capable of Existing , is not , in proper Speech , an Essence . Wherefore , since neither Corpus , Mixtum , Vivens , Animal nor Homo , taken ( as those words signifie them ) in Common , are Capable of Existing , but the Particulars or Individ●ums of each of those Kinds ; 't is consequent , that , as none of These is properly an Ens , but only the Individuums of each of those Common Sorts ; so , neither is that which constitutes any of them properly to be call'd an Essence , but That only which constitutes the Individual Thing . Again , since an Individuum ( v. g. Peter ) contains in it self all those Common Notions ; and so , that what answers to the Definitions of each of them is Included in Him , and Verify'd of Him ; it follows , that they are , all of them , ( as was said ) Metaphysical Parts of Peter , or Parts of his Essence ; and that He is a Whole in respect of The● ▪ Wherefore , since ( as was said ) a Part cannot exist but in the Whole ; none of these can exist but in their Individuals , nor is ( of it's self ) properly an Ens or Thing : Nor , consequently , ( since Essence is the Formal Constitutive of Ens , or o● that which is Capable of Being , ) are their Essence in proper Speech , ESSENCES . In a word [ Ens ] signifies what 's Capable of Existing ; which none of those Common Essences , ( staying in Them ) is or can be ; for , were they such , they must necessarily make the Concretes , which are their Subjects , to be thus Capable of Existing ; which , ▪ ●is most Evident they do not ; seeing nothing in Common does , or can exist , but only Particulars . 3. Corollary I. This notwithstanding , we can discourse as clearly of those Improper Essences , nay , far more clearly and evidently , than we can of those Proper ones . For , since those Improper and Analogical Essences , are , each of them , some One Inadequate or Abstracted Conception which we make of the Whole Thing ; v. g. the Essence or Nature of such a Quantity , Figure , Time , Place , Situation , &c. and ( our Soul , as will be seen hereafter , being Indivisible ) they , by being in our Conception are there Indivisibly , that is , most Dsstinctly , such : Hence , they are apt to render our Discourses , which are conversant about such most Distinct Objects , most Distinct and Clear also . Whereas , on the other side , the Essences properly so called which Constitute the Individuums , do involve many of those Improper Essences in their Constitution ; which must needs make those thus-Compounded Objects Confus'd ; and , thence , less clearly Intelligible . It follows then manifestly , that we can discourse more clearly of those Improper Essences or Natures , which abstract from their Subject , and from the rest of their fellow-Modes ; than we can of the Proper Essences that constitute the Whole Individuum ; of which ( as was said ) rhe other are but Metaphysical Parts , which are blended ( in some sort ) confusedly to compound or make up that Whole . 4. That Complexion of Accidents which constitutes the Essence of the Individuum , must be far Greater than that which constitutes the Generical or the Specisical Natures ▪ For , since these Later are but Parts of the Individual Essence ; there is necessarily requir'd more Parts to constitute the Essence of the Individuum , which in respect of them , has the Nature of the Whole . Again , since there are found under every Common Notion or Nature Great Multitudes of Individuums , each of which must be Distinct from all the others ; there , must necessarily be a far Greater Complexion of Accidents to distinguish these , by their various Complication , from one another , than was requisite to distinguish and constitute the Common Natures ; the Common Kinds of Things being , in comparison of them , but a very Few . 5. That Complexion of Accidents which constitutes Individual Bodies , must be the most perfect Act they can have , except that of Existence . For , since 't is the Nature of Power , ( taken in a Physical sense ) or of Matter , to be Common to All , it can distinguish no Two of them from one another : On the other side , it being hence evident , that 't is the nature of Act , and of It only , to Distinguish ; nor can there be a greater Distinction , than to make each Subject to be This , and ●● Other ; it follows hence , that the Complexion of Accidents which constitutes Individuums , and which imparts this Formal Effect to each of them , is the greatest Distinguisher , or , ( which is the same ) the most Perfect Act Second-Causes can give . And that this is a less perfect Act than Existence is Evident ; because the utmost it can do is to make it's Subject , This Thing , or This Ens ; that is , to make it Capable of Existing ; and , consequently , tho' it be most Actual in the , direct Line of Ens , yet it has the Nature of ● Power in respect of Existence ; which is therefore the Ultimate Actuality , or most perfect Act Imaginable next to that of a DEITY , and most resembling it . 6. Corollary II. Hence is evidently demonstrated against the Atheists , that 't is above all the Power of Natural Causes , and only Peculiar to GOD , to give the last Actuality of Existence . For , since , as appears by our former Discourses , all that Natural Causes can do , is , by Motion , to mingle the First Bodies , which have more or less of Quantity in them , ( that is , which are Rare or Dense ; ) from the Diversity of which Action , follows their various Size , Number , Proportion , Figure , Situation , &c. and these do make the several Complexions of Accidents which constitute all the Individuums in Nature ; and , in none of those Effects is found the Notion of Existence , much less of a New Existence , ( which yet belongs to every Individual when it is first made , ) as will easily be discern'd by any Reflecter , who considers the Notion or Essence of those several Modes , and compares them to the Notion or Nature of Existence : It follows manifestly , that the last Actuality of Existence cannot be given by Natural Causes , but must come from some Cause above Nature ; that is , from the Author of Nature , or from that Supreme Essentially-existing Cause , GOD Whence is demonstrated , a posteriori , th●● There is a GOD. 7. There must be some Instant , in which the Individuum becomes another Thing or of another Kind . For , 〈…〉 't is a manifest contradiction to say , that any thing can , for any one Instant , much less for any part of Time , be , at once , what it lately was , and what it newly is ; or be at once it's-self and ●… ▪ it's self , but Another : 'T is Demonstrable that there must be some Instant , in which it first becomes ▪ This Individuum , ( or of this Kind ) and ceases to be Another , or of Another Kind . 8. This Complexion of Accidents , which Determines the Matter to be This , and no Other , in the First Instant of it's Being , must necessarily ●● Essential to the Individuum newly made . For , since meer Accidents do advene to the Thing already made This ▪ and , therefore , do presuppose it according to some Priority or other ; and there can be no Priority ▪ ( no , not even that of Nature or Reason ) of the ●…ng to that which constitutes it ; because that which constitutes it , as being it 's Formal Cause , 〈…〉 Priority of Nature to It , as the Cause has to 〈…〉 Effect : It follows , that That Complexion of Accidents which Determines the Matter to be This 〈…〉 no Other , in the First Instant of it's Being , ●…st necessarily be Essential to the Things or Individuums newly made . 9. Therefore , this Complexion of Accidents ●ow spoken of , is , the Essential 〈…〉 Substantial FORM of the new●ade Compound or Individuum . That it is the Form of it is Evident ; because the whole Notion 〈…〉 the Form or Act , is nothing 〈…〉 but to be the Distinguisher of the Confused or Undistinguisht Potentiality of the Matter ; or to be the Determiner of it's Indifferency to This or That , ( which , in the Schools Language , is to Inform it ; ) and by doing thus , to be the Constituter of the Individuum : And , that this Complexion of Accidents does these Essects , is manifest ; because it is suppos'd to be Peculiar to the Individuum it constitutes , and found in no other . Lastly , That this Complexion of Accidents , or Form , is Essential 〈…〉 it's Proper Individuum is shown , § . 8. 10. For the same Reason , whatever Modes or Accidents do accrue to the Ens or Individuum afterwards , are Accidental to it ; whether they concern it's Quantity , or the Accession or Diminution of the Matter ; that is , it 's Growth and Decay ; or it's Qualities which perfect it ; or the Relations it acquires to other Individuums ; and much more what Denominations soever come to it from any of the last Predicaments ; because all these do adven● , or are superadded to the Ens already Essentially constituted ; and are , as it were , engrafted on that Stock of Being , and do not constitute it . 11. All Individuums must have some Degree of Constancy and Permanency i● their Notion . For , since all Natural Motion is for some End , to the attaining which it is a kind of Way or Tendency ; and the Way or Means is not the End ; and , consequently , Motion is not the End of Motion ; it follows , that the End of Motion must be something that has some kind of Rest , Fixure , and Constancy in its Nature . Wherefore , since the End of that Natural Motion which Determines the Power or Matter to be This , and no other , is to produce the Individuum ; it follows . that the Individuum or Ens produc'd by that Motion , must not be perpetually-Changing , or continually Successive , as that Motion was , but must have some degree of Permanency in it . Add , that were not this so , we could never say with Truth , that any thing is what it is ; nor , indeed , that it is ; nor , could we act or discourse about it ; since ere we could speak , act , or think ; the. Thing would be Chang'd and Vanisht . Nor would the Notion of Substance consist in an Indivisible ; nor be Distinct from that of Quantity . Nor would the Accidents have any Being ; there being in that case no Determinate Thing to which they could belong , or by means of which they might Bee , or which they might modify . 12. EXISTENCE supervening to the Notion 〈…〉 Nature of Ens , does add also 〈…〉 the Ens or Substance , some Degree of Stability and Constancy . ●or , since Motion . , consider'd ●ormally according to it's precise and abstracted Notion , does only import , that no Two Parts , that is Nothing of it , is at once ; but that some ●arts of it are not now , but past ; others , are not ●… , but to come ; it is manifest to any acute con●●derer , that Motion , according to it 's own precise Notion , or taken as Abstracted from it's Subject which is moved , and from the other Accidents ●hich are found in It , and in the Conti●…ous Bodies through which it moves , is nothing 〈…〉 but a Continu'd Flux of certain Not Beings ; ●hich it sows ( as it were ) all along through it's ●…hole Progress ; of which therefore it seems formally to consist . Wherefore , since Existence ( in what kind soever ) is diametrically Opposite to Not ▪ being ; it follows , that as Motion gives a fleeting Inconstancy to the Subject it affects ; so Existence does , of it 's own Nature , give to the Ens or Substance , it 's Proper Subject , a certain degree of Stability and Constancy ; and some degree of Permanency in retaining the same Essence ; as far as the nature of the Subject , and the best Order of the World , design'd by it's All-Wise Governour , sees fitting . 13. Corollary III. Hence , our steady Reflexion upon what has been hitherto deduced , will inform us , that this Determination of Matter , as to certain Lesser and Greater Degrees , which constitute the Superiour and Inferiour Kinds of Things ; and , especially this Ultimate Determination of it by such a Complexion of Accidents as is Incommunicable to any other , and constitutes and fixes the Essence of the Individuums , as is shown , § . 9. is absolutely Necessary for all Created Things ; as rendring them Apt or Fit to exist , which is the Main Work of Nature , and the only Means to continue the Succession of Creatures . Whence it is not carry'd on by a Temerarious or Fortuitous Conduct ; but is like the Artificial Twisting together of many scatter'd Ends , and tying them into one Firm Knot ; or the summing up the many Scenes and Interludes , or the Windings and Turnings of variously-operating Causes ▪ in one harmonious Close at the last Act. All which clearly argues a form'd Design , and an All comprehending Providence in the Giver of Being ; sweetly and surely disposing his Creatures to this Ultimate Determination to be This , or to a Capacity of receiving Existence . 14. Corollary IV. This Complexion of Accidents being Incommunicable to any other Individuum , and withal Essential to it , can never be Eradicated while the Compound continues . This is in a manner Self-Evident . For , this Complexion being the ESSENTIAL Form which constitutes the Compound ; it follows , that the Compound must remain Constituted , or continue , while that which makes it such is in it ; in the same manner as Rotundity being the Formal Cause why a ▪ Thing is Round , that thing must continue to be Round while Rotundity is in it . 15. Corollary V. This Complexion of Accidents gives each Individuum , and sometimes the whole Species , a Different Genius and Propension . Thus every single Man has from his Conception , some peculiarity of Temperament , Genius , Humour , or Inclination , distinct from that of all others ; which tho' Art , Education , Reflexion and Circumstances may alter , for the better or the worse ; yet nothing can so totally efface or extinguish it , but the Root of that peculiar Propension will stick fast rivetted in his Selfish Individuality . Thus Original Sin is transfus'd from Adam , and engrafted in the primigenial Constitution of each of his Descendents ▪ [ In peccatis concepit me mater mea , Psal. 50. ] inclining Men more or less to this or that sort of Sin , according as their Individual Temperature determines their Propension . And , tho' God's All-powerful Grace and careful Christian Discipline may restrain it's promptitude from breaking out into Enormous Outward Actions ; yet no Man but feels it too deeply rooted in his Nature to be ever extirpated ; so that even the greatest Saints may with grief cry out , Quis me liberabit a corpore mortis hujus ? Thus , every Individual Seed ▪ tho' it be of the same Kind , has a peculiar Temperament and Complexion of its own ; which tho' we cannot discern while we view it in little ; yet in evidently discovers it self in the Individual Shrub or Tree which springs from it , when grown up ; in which we may then observe thousands of Diversities from other Individuums of the same kind ; tho' they be planted in the same Soyl , water'd by the same Rain , and equally quicken'd and warm'd by the same Sun : A certain Argument that all those Varieties amongst such Vegetables , were included intrinsecally in the Primordial and Individual Constitution and Temperament of each of those single Seeds , and did spring thence Originally . 16. From what 's said above 't is evidently Demonstrated , that there can be no show of Reason , why Existence should be the Principle of Individuation . For , since what 's Nothing cannot exist ; That only which is an Ens , or ( which is the same ) an Individuum , can be capable of Existence . Wherefore , there must be conceived First , ( in Priority of Nature ) an Ens , Thing or Individuum constituted , e're we can conceive there can be any Subject fit to receive Existence ; and , consequently Existence , which presupposes the Individuum Constituted , cannot be the Principle that Constitutes it . Again , since nothing that is Common to more Individuals ( v. g. A Man or Horse is Common ) cannot exist , but only what is Determinately This or That , ( v. g. This Individual Man or this Horse , &c. ) 't is most evident that the Matter must be made or Determin'd to be This or That ; that is , it must be constituted such an Individuum , ere it can possibly be Capable to exist . Wherefore , Existence is Subsequent to the Constitution of the Individuum , and , so , cannot be the Principle by which it is constituted . Lastly , the Power does ex naturâ rei antecede the Act ; otherwise it would follow , that That is which cannot be ; which is against an Identical Proposition , and a manifest Contradiction . Whence , seeing ( as was lately shown ) only Individuums , which are This or That in particular , can bee , or have a Power to bee ; they must first be suppos'd to be Determin'd by Natural Causes , ere Existence , which is their Proper Act can supervene , or put them in the state or condition of being Actually , or Extra causas . The Literal meaning of which Philosophical phrase , consonantly to the Doctrine now delivered , is this ; that while that Action , call'd the Determination of the Potentiality and Indifferency of the Matter , was yet on foot and not compleated or brought to Perfection , the Ens or Individuum was not as yet otherwise than in fieri , ( as the Schools call it ) or yet a doing or making ; that is , within the Power of those Determining Causes ; but , as soon as that Action is brought to perfection , there results thence , as the Ultimate Terminus or End of that Determination , an Individuum , capable to be put extra Causas , or put out of Subjection or Dependence on those Natural Efficients ; which now had done working , having perform'd all that belong'd to them to do . At which very instant the never-failing Goodness of the First Being , gives actually to the Individuum , thus render'd Capable of Being , that most perfect Actuality we call Existence , by which ▪ it is Formally put in a condition of being extra Causas ; or no longer immediately dependent on them , but on GOD only . 17. Corollary VI. From this Stability , which the Thing has from it's Individuality and from it's being Existent , results Another Formal Conception of Ens , call'd it's Subsistence , or being of it's self , or from the merits of it's own Notion or Nature ; and also , the being That by which only it's Nature and Modes have Being . Whence it comes that some define Ens to be , [ Id quod subsistit in se & substat Accidentibus : ] which is something more than the bare Meaning or Notion of the word [ Ens ] imports , which only speaks a Capacity of Existing . The word [ Thing ] taken in this Sense , or under this Consideration , is commonly call'd a Substratum , Subjectum , Suppositum , or the Quod both of the Nature and it's Accidents ; for both these , in respect of it are but Quo Res est ; or that by which it is constituted such , either Substantially or Accidentally . That this Notion is formally Distinct from the Notion of an Ens or Individuum is most Evident ; for These regard no more but that the Matter be ultimately Determin'd to be This , and thence becomes Capable of Existing : But , that what 's thus Capable to Exist , or Actually Exists , does exist of it self , without the Assistance of Another ; and , thence , gives the Nature and the Accidents that accrue to it , to have Being , or to Bee , ( whence it has properly the Notion of a Suppositum ) is too clearly Distinct from the other to need Proving . And , that the Notion of Subsistence is Different from that of Existence is no less manifest ; because the Formal , or rather Total Effect of Existence , being only to make the Thing bee actually , or to put it extra Causas , is clearly Different from the Notion of Subsisting by it self , or sustaining the Modes and the Nature too . And , indeed , if we regard it attentively , the Notion of a Subsistent Thing , or a Suppositum , is Subsequent to the Notion of Thing or Ens , and superadds a New consideration to it ; both as it regards it's Standing by it's self , and also , that the Nature and Accidents do all stand in their Being by means of it . Whence the Notion of a Subsister , or a Suppositum , ( or , in Intelligent Things , of a Person ) seems to include all the Perfections , and to have all the Advantages an Ens , or Individuum , is Capable of : Tho' sometimes the Notions of Ens , Being , Existing , and Subsisting , are , for want of due Reflexion , carelesly confounded . 18. From what has been discourst above , Ch. 3. and in this present Chapter , it will not be hard to determine when the Individuality of the several Bodies in Natureare Chang'd 〈…〉 Lost. There can be no doubt but that this happens when those Bodies can no longer retain that Primogenial Complexion of Accidents which make the Individuum fit to perform that Primary Operation , peculiar to it self , as 't is Distinct from all other Indiviuums . But the difficulty is how we can ever come to know That ; those Individuating Complexions of the Accidents being so many , and mingled with such a peculiar , accurate and singular Niceness , that , 't is impossible we should ever come to Know or Comprehend them exactly and distinctly . But , I hope this Difficulty that seems at first sight so Insuperable , will upon Examination appear to be none at all . To clear it then , I lay these few Positions . 19. First , We may observe , and plain Experience will inform our ordinary Reflexion , that ( speaking of Mixts ) no Individual of any Kind , when it ceases to be , or , is Corrupted , is Chang'd into Another Individuum of the same Kind , V. g. No Individual Stone , Tree , Horse , or Man , is thus Chang'd meerly into Another Individual Stone , Tree , Horse or Man : For , were this so , then , indeed , the Difficulty would be Insoluble . 20. Secondly , Hence follows immediately , that the Individual Nature is never Chang'd alone , but the Specifical Nature always , and oft-times the Generical too , is Chang'd likewise . 21. Thirdly , That 't is very easie to know the difference between the Primary Operations of such Bodies as differ Specifically or Generically , ( as is shown above , Ch. 2. and 3. ) and thence to discern when the Species or Genus , and , consequently , the Individuum is Chang'd . The reason why the Change of those Former , induces a Change in this Later , is , Because all the Superiour Notions are Essential to the Individuum ; as Logic demonstrates , and Common Sense informs us Peter cannot be This Man , unless he be a Man ; nor can Man be this sort of Animal , ( which is Essential to it , or rather part of it's very Definition ) unless he be an Animal ; nor can Animal be This sort of Living Thing , unless it be Living , &c. Whence follows , that whenever the Individuum is render'd Incapable of performing the Primary Operation of it's Species or Genus under which it is rankt , the Individuality is a fortiori perisht and Chang'd . For , every Individuum is nothing but One of that Kind , or Higher Notion , under which 't is comprehended : And , how can it be said to be One of that Kind , when that Kind it self ( as far as concerns it ) is Chang'd and Gone ! 22. Hence , neither the Specifick Nature , nor the Individuation of Vegetables or Animals is lost , when a Branch or a Limb is cut off ; provided that Mixture and Organization of Parts be not destroy'd which enables them to Digest the Nourishing Juice or Aliment , requisite to preserve the Compound , which is it's Primary Operation . 23. Hence the Individuality of Man , as Man , ●●ot Chang'd , whatever Limbs ●…loses , unless those parts be Corrupted , or totally Disabled , that are necessary for Ratiocination ; which is the Primary Operation of his Species , Man. 24. Hence the Individuality of a Simple Body or Element ( if there be any such now ) would be alter'd , if the Degree of Rarity and Density be so notably chang'd , that a vastly different Operation follows from it ; and that the Subject which is thought to succeed , does enjoy that Degree , not meerly successively , or in transitu , but with some kind of Constancy , or for some time ; so that it will not be immediately reduced to it's former state by Natural Causes . For , in this case , that Degree alters the Species it self of the Simple Body , ( as is shown , Ch. 2. § . 21. ) and , consequently , the Individuation . 25. Hence the Individuality of First-Mixt Bodies is lost , when they are dissolv'd into Simple Bodies ; because this changes the Specifick Nature of a Mixt. See Ch : 3. § . 2 , 3 , 4. 26. Hence , Demixts are Individually Chang'd when the Proportion of the First-Mixts is alter'd to a high Degree , and continues so with some Constancy . See Ch. 3. § . 7 , 8. 27. Simple Division , if perfectly such , takes away the Individual Unity in Homogeneous Bodies . For , since to Divide is to make more of o●● ▪ and what divides the Thing or Individuum , as 't is an Ens divides it as 't is Un●● , and therefore takes away it's Unity ; and , on the other side , since Homogeneous Bodies are such that each part of them does , according to it's pitch , perform the same kind of Primary Operation ; It follows , that meer Division , if it be perfected , takes away the Individual Unity . Again , since neither part of the Divided Body is by Division annihilated ; each of them , after Division ●s Capable of Existence ; and , consequently , they being made Two , ( at least , ) by Division , they become duo Entia ; and , since they can and do exist . Two Individuums . 28. Yet meer Division does not necessarily alter the Divided Individuum , essentially , if it be very Heterogeneous ●● Organical . For , since the former Individuum is in that case , ( if not always ) under such a Species a● is Constituted by such a Complexion of Accidents as fits it for it's Primary Operation ; and the Individuum has , moreover , a peculiar Complexion of it's own ; both which being Essential to them , they must , consequently , continue essentially the same while the same Formal Constituent remains , because it is still Capable to perform the Substance of it's former Operation : It follows , that the former Individuum and Species too must continue , unless the Division is such that it destroys the said Complexion , which ( as was shown , Ch. 2. § . 16. and here § . 9. ) is their Essential Form. Wherefore the former Individuum is , in these , only chang'd Accidentally ; that is , ●oses only some virtuality or potentiality of it's Matter , some part of it's Quantity , or some Qualities immediately affecting that part which is taken from it ; none of which are Essential to it ; and these Accidents which the Matter of that part had formerly , being sufficient to Determine the Matter of which a New Individuum is made ; that Matter is so dispos'd before-hand , that there needed little but to put it out of the condition of being any longer a Port , to fit it for Existence . 29. Two contra-distinct Natures may very connaturally , if things be well order'd , compound One Individual Ens or One Thing : And , therefore , the Soul and Body may make up that One Thing call'd A Man. For there can be no doubt but that Things of the most opposite Natures can and do perfectly agree in the Common Generical Notion of Thing , and , that , therefore , all their Disagreement , Opposition and Inconsistency , does spring from their Differences ; or , ( that we may bring the Discourse from Logical to Metaphysical Language , from the Act : ) from which only , and not from the Power , all Distinction ( and , consequently , Contradistinction ) comes . Wherefore , when there are not two Distinct Substantial Acts in the Compound , ( as there is in Hirco-ceruus and other Chimera's ) nothing can hinder their Coalition into One Thing . On the other side , since there can be no difficulty for the Proper Parts of any Compound to make up One Whole ; and it has been shown , ( Chap. 1. § . 17 , 18. ) that the Proper Parts of a Compound Ens , as such , are Power and Act ; 't is Clear that there are not more Contradistinct Acts in such an Ens. Wherefore , if the Matter or Power , on the Body's side , can by the Author of Nature be so dispos'd as to require a Form of a Spiritual Nature ; the Bodily Part will thence become the Proper Matter of that Compound Ens ; and that Spiritual Nature will be the Proper Act or Form of such a Body ; and this verè & essentialiter , as the Council of Vienna has defin'd ; and so , both together will friendly conspire to make up that One Ent , call'd a Man. The main difficulty then objected is quite taken away and superseded : For , since only Two Substantial Acts can distinguish and multiply Entia or Things ; and here is but One Act determining the Power or Matter to This Entity , and , consequently , to Unity under the notion of Thing ; 't is demonstrable by a Metaphysical Argument , as it was ( Ch. 4. § . 1. ) by a Logical one , that Man , made up , according to this Doctrine , of Soul and Body , is most truly and properly One Thing , as much as any other Natural Compound whatever , and not Two Things . This Discourse supposes there can be some Disp●●●ion in a Body , requiring a Form which is not educible out of the Power , or Matter , by Natural Causes . Of which , see Ch. 4. especially § . 10. and the Preliminary there cited . 30. There is no show of Impossibility , why the Divine and the Human Nature may not join in one Suppositum ; or rather , why the Human Nature may not subsist in a Divine Person . For , since an Infinite Being , as the Divine Nature i● , has eminently in it's self all the Perfections belonging to Being ; of which , ( as was shown above , Coroll . 6. ) Subsistence or Standing alone by it's own virtue , is one ; and , consequently , it can supply by it self immediately any such Perfection , so it does not induce any Imperfection in GOD , only which can render it impossible ; it follows , that Humane Nature may be made to subsist in a Divine Suppositum , provided it draws not after it any Imperfection or Unbecomingness Unworthy of GOD ; which cannot be said in this case . For , to communicate or impart it's Subsistence or Personality to another is most Agreeable to an Infinite Goodness , when his Wisdom sees it most fit and most Necessary for the Good of a very considerable Portion of the Creation . Nor does this put the least degree of Potentiality or Imperfection in the Divine Nature , or makes it a Potential Part , or an Informing Form ; but it supposes the Humane Nature constituted , and only supplies it's Subsistence or Personality ; 't is evident then , that this neither alters nor depresses the Divine Nature from it's Highe●● Dignity of being still , in it self , a Pure Actuality , but is rather Agreeable to that Attribute ; since it only exalts Humane Nature , by thus Assuming it , or Uniting it to a Divine Person Hypostatically , ( that is according to the Notion of Suppositum ) to which , of it's self , it could not otherwise aspire . To do which , also , ( the Wisest and Best Ends of the Incarnation being well reflected on ) is , as Divines show , no way Derogatory , but in every respect Agreeable to the Divine Attributes And all the Objections that the Antient Greeks and Modern Adversaries can bring to show ●● Foolish and Misbecoming GOD , seem grounded on this , that GOD is Infinitely GREAT , ( which makes the greatest Esclat in their Fancy ) without considering at the same time that he is Equally , that is , Infinitely GOOD . Which resembles those men'● way of Arguing , who are only sollicitous of magnifying GOD's Power and his Will , without considering his Wisdom ; which ( according to our manner of Conceiving ) determines the exercise of those other Attributes . 31. Notwithstanding this Hypostatick Union of those two Natures in Christ , each Nature retains it's own Distinction , Essence , Properties and Attributes . For , ●●●ce this Union of these two ●●tures in one Suppositum or Person , supposes those Natures Distinctly and Essentially constituted ; and the giving them meerly to Subsist , super●●●es to the Nature already constituted , and therefore can be no part of it's Essential Constitutive ; consequently , it neither alters the Divine Nature , no● affects the Humane Nature at all by making 〈…〉 Subsist such as it is ; which is a Notion evidently Extraneòus to the Notion of the Nature , and ●ifferent from it . Wherefore , each of those Natures remains in it's own precise Essential bounds ; and not Mingled or Confounded with the other , as some Eutychians fondly imagin'd . 32. Yet all the Actions and Passions of this Subsistent Thing , to which soever of those Natures they properly ●●long , are justly attributed to Christ , GOD and Man. For , ●ince the Suppositum of those two Natures are but One , and that Suppositum is Christ's ; and all Actions and Passions belong to the Suppositum , and are attributed to it ; 't is consequent , that the Actions of this diverse-natur'd Suppositum do belong to Christ who has those Distinct Natures in Him. Moreover , since every thing do●● connaturally Act and Suffer as it is ; and Christ , he having Two Natures or Essences in One Suppositum , is truly GOD and Man ; it follows , against Nestorius , that all the Actions of Christ are Divine-Human , or Theandrical . With which yet well consists that some Actions and Sufferings may belong to his Suppositum according to , or by reason of the one Nature , and not by reason of the other . 33. Hence also , there can be no show of Contradiction in saying the Divine Nature is Three according to the Notion of Subsistence , and yet but one according to the Notion of Essence . For , since , as has been shown here , § . 17. the Respect or Notion of Subsistence is quite different from the Respect of Essence ; and there can be no Contradiction where Opposites are Affirm'd and Deny'd of the same according to a Different Respect : It follows , that neither can there be any show of Contradiction in saying the Divine Nature is Three according to the precise Notion or Respect of Subsistence , and yet not-Three but One only in respect of the Notion of Essence . 34. Advertisement . For the clearer understanding some parts of these late Discourses , and to render some Terms we have us'd more distinctly intelligible , I take leave to re-min'd my Reader here of what I have frequently inculcated in my former Books , viz. first , That all our Knowledge , which is Solid , is of the Thing ; and taken from the Thing : Secondly , That we cannot know the Thing Clearly and Distinctly any other way than by having several Partial or Inadequate Conceptions of it ; which therefore are Knowledges of the Thing in part only . Thirdly , That hence when ever we speak of Act , Power , Essence , Ens , Form , Matter , Existence , Subsistence , Quantity , Quality , or of any other Intrinsecal Mode ; we neither can , nor ought , mean any other by those words , but the Thing , according as it is the Object of those several Abstracted Notions or Considerations we make of it ; and , which are Verify'd of It : and , consequently , ( since all Verification is made by the Copula [ Est ] , which signifies Identity ) which are truly It. Fourthly , Hence , when we speak of Metaphysical Parts of the Thing , according to the meer Notion of Thing , we mean that they are Parts of the Thing Metaphysically consider'd ; or as it is the Object that verifies , or has in it , what answers to those Conceptions or Notions which do properly belong to ENS or BE●●G ; because the Supreme Science , Metaphysicks , does only , or chiefly , regard or concern her self with such Notions as belong to Being ●● it's Proper Object . In the same manner as the Notions of Length , Breadth , and Thickness which belong to Quantity as it abstracts from Natural Motion , are the Parts , or Partial Conceptions of Bodies , or of that Thing , call'd Body , consider'd Mathematically ; and those Notions which regard Quantity , as affecting t●● Thing in order to Natural Action or Passion , ( ●●● Rarity , Density , Divisibility , &c. ) are Parts , ●● Partial Conceptions of Body , Physically consider'd ▪ As likewise are Matter and Form , for the same reason , if taken under the same consideration of Grounding Natural Action or Passion : For , as they meerly relate to Being , or , as they are consider'd precisely as Parts or Partial Conceptions of Ens , they belong to Metaphysicks , and are there call'd Power and Act. Fifthly , Hence , the Ens or Thi●● ( properly so call'd , ) that is the Individuum , ●● call'd by us a Whole ; because all those Partial Conceptions , ( objectively consider'd ) are Contain'd and Involv'd in the Individuum , an● are Verify'd of it , as is shown above ; which being only Inadequate in respect to the Whole Thing they are hence said to be only Parts of It ; and It a whole in respect of them . Sixthly , Tho' the● be only Different Conceptions of the same Thing yet thus Aparted and Abstracted by our Understanding , we can discourse of each of them singly , as if they were so many Distinct Essences or ●●stinct Things ; tho' in re they be but One Thing variously conceiv'd . And , thence , we can consider , what , or how great a Complexion of A●●dents is requisite to constitute the Essences of ●●● of those Superiour or Inadequate Notions ; an● what is requir'd to constitute Another ; as is se●● Ch. 2 , 3 , 4. Hence , also , we can truly say , that One of them is not Another ; viz. Formally or Distinctly taken ; tho' Materially or as in ●● they are but One and the Same Thing ; in the same manner as we can say , The Hand is not the Foot ; which are Integral parts of a Man , and not ●●stinct Things from the Man materially , but ●…fy'd with him in re . Seventhly , Hence ●… , we can say with Truth , that the Thing ●●y be Chang'd according to One of these Con●…tions or Respects , and not-Chang'd according ●● another : That the Determination to be This , ●…de ( immediately ) by Second Causes ; the ●istence not , but given by GOD : That a Thing , ●●●ording to the precise Notion of Essence or ●●ture , may be Two ; and yet not-Two , but One ●●●ording to the Notion of Suppositum ; or may ●● Three as to it's Suppofitality or Personality , and ●● but One according to it's Essence or Nature . ●● which sayings are properly Verify'd , because ●●●●●●●mation and Negation are only made in ●● Mind , where One of those Notions is not the 〈◊〉 ; or ( which is the same ) where the Thing ●● ●●●ceiv'd THUS , is not the Thing as conceiv'd ●●HERWISE : And the same , is , of the Things 〈◊〉 United or Assum'd according to the No●●●● of Person , and yet not-United according to ●●● Notion of Essence . Lastly , 't is to be noted , ●●● as [ Conception , Apprehension , Proposition , Dis●●●● , &c. ] are Metaphorical Expressions tran●… from Corporeal to Spiritual Natures , by 〈…〉 of some Analogy , Proportion or Resem●… to those other ; so , likewise , are those ●…ds , [ Substratum , Suppositum , Subjectum , Inhe●… , Accident , ] and such like : And the Literal meaning of those words is this ; that , As those things which cannot subsist or stand by themselves , or by virtue of any Firmness of their own , ●● re , or in Nature , must , and use to be under●●●● and sustain'd by Another , which is more Substantial ( as we use to say ) or more strong than they ; so , neither in our Mind , can the Notion of Mode , Manner , or Accident stand alone , unless we conceive Some Thing of which it is a Mode , or speaks the Manner HOW it is ; or Some Thing to which it advenes , or is superadded ; whereas , on the other side , we have the Notion of Being or Thing without apprehending such a Transcendental Relation to the Mode or Manner how it is : Whence the Notion of Thing has a kind of Priority in our Minds to the Accidents or Modes , under the consideration of Standing in our Intellect without them ; and the Notions of the Modes or Accidents has a kind of posteriorily in our Mind , and a Dependence on them for their Being these ; because the former has Being , one way or other , in it's Notion ; the others , as Length , Whiteness , Roundness , & ● . have in their Notion no express signification of Being at all . Whence , I cannot but think Mr. Locke should not have apply'd his Ingenio●● Raillery of Supporting and Underpropping ; and of an Elephant supporting the Earth , and a Tortoise the Elephant , to those Authors who were forced to use those words ; in case they did not take those Expressions in that Gross and too-Literal Sense : And I conceive he might with equal Justice have apply'd them against Grammarians , who tell us , that a Noun Substantive can stand by it's self ; a●● a Noun Adjective , cannot without it's Elephant and Tortoise ( the Substantive ) to support it . MEDITATION . WE have seen formerly in what consisted our Essence , as we are of that Species , call'd Mankind . This was a fair Step towards the Knowing our Individual Self ; which we have here , to ●●r power , attempted . But , alas ! How lamely and imperfectly have ●e reacht it ? We experienc'd no great difficulty to find our way amongst so many Common Kinds of Things , tho' ▪ in a manner , Strangers to us ; but we have lost our selves at home . A Few Abstracted Modes twisted together ●…y by Nature , did oft ▪ times satisfie our Enquiry , ●●ile we discours'd of the former ; but , when we came to consider that numerous Complexion of them , only which can serve to constitute our Individual Body , ●●d to distinguish our single Self from every other Particular Thing , whether of our own or of any other Kind , we are at an utter loss , and seem bewilder'd ●●● pathless Wood ! Such a Concourse of various Ac●●ents , and ( as it were ) Thrums-ends of Being , are requisite to weave our Particular Texture , so to make up This Thing which we are ; that , to endeavour to comprehend them all , seems the same as to go about to fathom at once a great part of Nature ; and , in stead of enlightning us , stuns our Understanding . Our Primigenial Composition , in the last minute of our Embryo-state , which was the first Instant of our being This Man , is so admirably Deli●ate , and the Stamina of it so finely spun by the most wise Contrivance of the Author of Nature , that we may break our Eye-balls by bending our Sight ●re we can gain a Glimpse of it . Nor can the help of Microscopes , which , as Modern Virtuoso's tell us , can show tho Outward Shape of the Tree in it's Seed , discover to us those imperceptible Particles , their Natures , Mixture , Order , Proportion , Situation , &c. that make up the Individual Composition of our Body , which gave the Particular Degree of Excellency and Nobleness to our Soul. Dull Artificers must see all the parts of the Matter they are to work upon ; that , so , they may measure , proportion , and place them ; but the Architect of the World needs no reflected Rays of his own Sun to discern them , but sees them by the Creative Light of his own Wisdom , ( or rather by seeing them , makes them , ) tho' they be meer Darkness to us . Non est occultatum os meum a te quod fecisti in occulto . & substantia mea in inferioribus terrae . Imperfectum meum viderunt oculi tui ; and every part of all thy Creature in libro duo scribuntur , Ps. 138. But , alas ! Who can read so abstruse a Manuscript , much less the Original from which 't is Copy'd . Let us then vail our over-weoning Pride ; bewail our Ignorance , and lament with the Eagle-sighted Evangelist , that No Man is found worthy or able to open the folded and Sealed Book , even of Created Nature ; nor read the Contents of it , wrapt up in the shady leaves of an incomprehensible Providence . But how large a Field of Contemplation is open'd to us , when we come to consider the Infinite number of Causes which were order'd to make this Complexion of Accidents that constituted This Body of ours , and Distinguisht it from all others in the First Instant of our Being ? What Mathematicks could contrive , what Mathematician can explicate , how all those Crooked and mutually-crossing Lines of sundry Kinds , in which those Causes mov'd , shohld meet in our Individuation as in their Center ? How much more wonderful will it be to reflect , that each of those numberless Causes had also their Causes fore-lay'd ; and they others before them ; and so upwards to the First Framing of the World ? And yet , our Reason assures us ▪ that none of these later or immediate Causes , nor , consequently , our self , their Product , could ●ver have been , had not this long Pedigree of Causes , as Ancient as the Beginning of Time , successively anteceded ; determining Matter to this Individual Body of ours ▪ which requir'd the Infusion of such a particular Soul , whence we became what we are . Blind Matter could never have seen her direct way to such a Steady End : Rash and Heedless Chance could never have cost Senseless Matter into such an orderly and wellcomplicated Frame . Be ever prais'd that Adorable Providence , which has design'd so large a portion of the Creation to run in a direct Track for the Production of so mean a Thing , so poor an Atome of Being ▪ ●● our selves , and our Contemporary Individuu●ns ▪ ●re . Yet we have by this Discourse gain'd a clear sight of what in common makes our Individuation , and in what it consists , tho' the Detail of it's particular Ingredients be hid from us : We have learnt too that nothing but an all-comprehending Wisdom and Providence , which has Plac'd us , tho' remotely , yet surely , in the Rank of Effects from the First Constitution of the World , could have ripen'd Nature so as to make us Spring out of the Seeds of our Causes in our proper Season . How Unreasonable then and how short-sighted is our Pride , which would persuade Mankind , that any particular Acquir'd Endowments of Dignity , Progeny , Beauty , or Parts , particularly that the Knowledge , in which some may excel others , do belong to our selves or our Individuums , or essentially distinguish us from those of our own Kind , who have not been so Fortunate , or so blest by Providence as we have been . I have done this , and I have done the other , thinks the Proud Boaster ; God has done this and the other by me , says the Humble and Wise Christian. Nay , if we reflect well , we shall find that we fall short of being even Common Instruments : For , those owe only their Motion and Direction to the Principal Cause ; but We owe our Being too to Him , who makes use of us to bring about his Infinitely-Wise Designs . None of those Endowments , Productions , or Acquisitions are to be attributed to us as Us. Our Substantial Individuation anteceded those Ornamental Accessories ; for we must be This , ere we could thus Act , or be thus Qualify'd . Nay , there is not one of those superadded Accidents , whether Intrinsecal or Extrinsecal , that furbisht up our Individuum , and fitted it to act for the Ends of the World 's Great Governour , but requir'd as vast a Chain of Precedent Causes as our Individuum it self . Our Nurses show'd us one fine thing after another ; which , that we might pick and glean Notions out of them by our Senses , we look'd wistly upon , and long'd to handle them . We put them to our Mouths , and knockt them against other things , as if we had a mind to know how they Tasted or Sounded . And , after we had perus'd them so long till we had suckt all the Knowledge out of them they could afford us ; we straight grew weary of them , threw them away , and cry'd for some new thing we had never seen before ; which we us'd in the same manner as we did the former , to enlarge our little Stock of Simple Apprehsnsions , which are the Elements of our Natural Knowledge . Then they began to name the things they show'd us ; and by , their continual Tattle , they fram'd our Tongues , and instructed our Lisping Vocal Organs to imitate them ; and so taught us by Degrees to prattle and ask for those things we needed . Growing up , we came by little and little , to compound those Simple Thoughts or Notions , which we had acquir'd , into Iudgments ; and were deliver'd over from our Natural Instructers to the Discipline of Schoolmasters ; and , in process of time , we began to converse with the Learned Part of the World by their Books and Verbal Discourses ; whence we become tinctur'd with their Thoughts concerning the several Natures of Things , and the Rules of Art , 〈…〉 which we stor'd up in the Repository of our Memory .. When we were thus furnisht with fit Matter , and some Forms of Discoursing , New Occasions and Circumstances joyn'd those previous and preparatory Knowledges , with which we were pre●…u'd , to our Present Thoughts ; which Dispositions had ( even to every single particular ) been fore●aid in us thro' the whole Course of our former Life ; ●nd , working in us according to our Natural Genius , 〈…〉 our Individual pitch of Rationality , were the Adequate Cause of that peculiar Turn of Writing and Discoursing , in which we differ from other Scholars . Now , each of those Assistants of ours which contributed to this Effect were , themselves , Individuums too ; and , consequently , had as far-fetcht , and as Ancient a Descent of Causes , to make them be what they are , as our Selves had : And the same may be said of those Circumstances , by which those several Informations come to be Apply'd from time to time to our Knowing Faculty ; which , how little , for the most part , they are in our power to foresee , lay or prevent , every Reflecter knows . So , that , that Maxim of the Stoicks , [ Agimur , non agimus ] seems in a manner ( tho' not in their Sense ) Appliable to the Wisest of us . We do all of us Act indeed , by our Natural Powers , which were given us by our Good Maker at first ; yet those meer Powers could not have exerted themselves into Action at all , nor have been Useful to us , unless order had been taken , by the same Goodness , to Determine them to perform This or That Action in particular , or to Act after such a manner ; and this by a Course of Causes impossible to be laid , or carry'd on by any in by the same Great Governour of the World. When I set my self to speculate or write , do I know before hand what New Thoughts I shall have , or what ●● Former Thoughts will Dictate to me ? Not one j●● . The present Circumstances do , indeed set those Thought I had got on work , and level them at such an Object : But the Disposal of them Rationally depends ●● Millions of Unseen Causes , preordain'd to bring ●● about ; which 't is Impossible for us to recollect , or ●● give any account of them . Whence , [ A Joue Principium ] is but a scanty Acknowledgement of our Intire Dependence on GOD for every Step our Soul takes towards Knowledge ; ( and the same discourse holds as to our Acquiring Virtue : ) and only beseems some Heathen , who had but Half-Lights of a DEITY . The Progress and Conduct of every Act of ours , towards both it's Immediate , and it 's Ultimate , End and Perfection , do , all of them , spring from the Giver of every Good and perfect Gift , as well as the Beginning of it . This Soveraign Cause , is , as well in Natural as Supernatural Effects , Principium , Rector , Dux , Semita , Terminus idem . Nay , every least Manner of Action , as far as it is Good ( as well as the Action it self ) is not only Determin'd but Proportion'd to it's Proper End by his Universal Superintendency . Therefore Right Reason and True Philosophy , as well as St. Paul's Sublime Faith and Divinity , do oblige us to catechize and ask our selves , Quid ●abes quod non accepisti ? Quod si accepisti , quid gloriaris quasi non acceperis ? 'T is Vain and False Philosophy then , and not the True one , which begets that ( miscall'd ) Science , which does inflare , or puff ●●●n up with a self-assuming Pride . Philosophy were ●●● Philosophy , did it not bring us to True Science ; ●●● Science would not be Science , did it not refund ●●●●cts into their Genuine Causes ; and , consequently , ●●●ry Action of ours ( as far as it is Good and not Defective ) into that Supreme and First Cause in whom we live , move , and have our Being . Hence , also ▪ is seen how powerfully True Science conduces to ●ake Men Virtuous ; For , by seeing thus evidently ●●r Total Dependence on GOD , and how little we ●●● do of our selves , it reads us a Solid and most effectual Lecture of Profound Humility ; which is the Ground of all Virtue , and the Basis of all our Spiritual Building . At least , ( I say ) we have thro' God's Assistance , gain'd by our former Discourse , a Certain , tho' something Confus'd Knowledge of what we are as to our Particulars ; and a Clear Discernment of what Kind we are ; viz an Intelligent and Rational Being . Let us follow then , and comply with what we undoubtedly know : Let us not degenerate from our Nature , and then we may be sure we shall not wrong our Creation , nor offend our Great Creatour . Let us cultivate ●●● Reason ; and extirpate it's Enemy , Passion . Let us love Truth , our Best Natural Perfection ; and pursue it by making use of those Means which are most Proper to attain it . To do this as we ought , let us not precipitate our Assent rashly ; but warily , and wisely suspend , till Self-evidence of our Principles , and Evidence of our Deductions appear ; only which can secure our Steps from stumbling into Errour . While we take this way , we may hope in the same good Providence which has led us on hitherto , to grow fit to comprehend Higher Truths ; till we ascend by those Gradual Approaches , as by the Step● of Jacob's Ladder , to reach Heaven ; and attain the Blissful Ssght of Him who is TRUTH it self ; which only can satisfie fully our Inquisitive and infinitely Capacious Understanding . CHAP. VI. some Preliminaries fore-lay'd in order to Demonstrate the Immortality of the SOUL . 1. THO' Man be but One Thing , as was prov'd , Chap. 4. § . 1. and Ch. 5. § . 20. ●●r we cannot but make Diverse Conceptions of Him as he is Man , according to those Different Na●●●es or Parts found in him , call'd ●●●l and Body . This needs no farther Proof , it being granted by all ; insomuch as some will ●●eds make them Two Distinct Things . And is ●●●her Prov'd . For , since , as has been demon●●rated above , the Soul is the Form ( or ACT ) of the Body ; and we cannot but have Different Notions or Conceptions of ACT and POWER ; it follows , that we cannot but have Different Notions or Conceptions of the Soul and the Body . 2. Preliminary II. Whence follows , that we may , and must have Different Notions , or Conceptions , of every Operation of Man , as ●● is Man. For , since every Man , tho' One Thing , yet has two Different Natures in him , of which he consists ; and every Thing is that of which it consists ; and Operates or Acts as it is ; it follows , that every Operation of Man , as well as Himself , is of vastly Different Natures and partakes of both ; and , consequently , we can , and are oblig'd , to have Diverse Conceptions of every such Operation , for the same Reason for which we must have Diverse Conceptions of those Natures themselves : that is , we can find somewhat in such Operations that is Proper or Peculiar to One of those Natures , and not Proper or Peculiar to the Other . Hence I proceed Closer to my Main Thesis , to be demonstrated in my next Chapter , viz. 3. If we can find by Evident Reflexion , that there is somewhat in the Operations which Man has according his Soul that is above the Nature of Matter ; or , above Quantity , which is the Common Affection of all Corporeal Nature ; and , therefore , that is Indivisible , or ( which is the same ) Indissoluble or Incorruptible ; it must follow demonstratively , that then , that Part of Man call'd his Soul , is Immaterial , Incorruptible , or Immortal . In order to Demonstrate which , we proceed with our Preliminaries . 4. Preliminary III. There are Three Distinct Operations of Man according to his Soul , as 't is Intellective or Knowing ; viz. Simple Apprehension , Iudging , and Discoursing . This I think , is granted by all , and is easily prov'd . For , we must first , Lay hold of that which we are to work upon ; or take into out Mind that of which we are to Iudge or Discourse , ( that is , have a Notion of it ) ; for , otherwise , we should Iudge and Discourse of we know not what ▪ Wherefore that Operation call'd Simple Apprehension , or the having the Notion of the Thing in our Mind , is clearly Antecedent to the other Two ; and , consequently , Distinct from them . Again , [ Discoursing ] does clearly presuppose some Iudgments already had , and Assented to , ere we can Deduce any thing out of them by Discourse ; since we must necessarily Iudge our Premisses True , ere we can hope to derive their Truth to another Proposition , or Deduce any thing ▪ out of them by our Reason ; which manifests a perfect Distinction between the Operations of Discoursing and Iudging . 'T is therefore Evident , that there are Three Distinct Operations of Man according to that Part call'd the Soul , as 't is Intellective or Knowing ; call'd Simple Apprehension , Iudging and Discoursing . 5. Preliminary IV. The Notion of ( Created ) Ens or Thing Abstracts from , or is Indifferent to Existence and Non-Existence ; and ( a fortieri ) to all Manner of Existence , Corporeal or Spiritual , in re or in intellectu , and therefore it is Capable of either . The first Part is Evident from the very Sense of the Word : For in the Signification of the Word which expresses any Created Being , as Peter , Michael , a Stone , a Man , &c. we find nothing at all of Being or Not-Being , either exprest or imply'd : Again , we can truly say of any Individuum , ( which is properly a Thing ) v. g. of Peter , that he is newly dead , or of Wood , that 't is turn'd into Fire ; which signifies , that those Things call'd [ Peter ] and [ Wood ] were before , and now are not ; which could not with truth be said , unless those Things were Indifferent to Being and not-Being , or Capable of either . 6. Preliminary V. The Form cannot be in the Subject , but it must make it Formally of his own Nature : V. g. Rotundity cannot be in any Subject , but it must make it Round ; Nor can any Quantity or Quality , v. g. the Quantity of a Yard , or Whiteness , be in a Thing , but they must make it a Yard long , and White , as the Nature of that Quantity and Colour is . This is Self-evident ; for to be a Yard long or White , is to have such a Length or such a Colour in it . Nor , for the same reason can any particular Nature be in any Thing , but it must make that Thing be of such a Nature . 7. Preliminary VI. A Notion or Conception may either be consider'd Subjectively ; as it is an Operation of the Mind , Affecting It , and Receiv'd in It as in it's Subject ; or Objectively , as that about which the Mind , when it has that Notion , is employ'd , as it 's Object , or the thing Known . This is a manner Self-evident . For , an Operation of a Knowing Power cannot be , but there must be something Known ; nor can a Thing be known without an Actual Knowledge of it . 8. Preliminary VII . Whatever is Known by the Soul , or is the Object of our Knowledge , must either it self be in the Soul , or else some Similitude or Representation of it . This also is in a manner Self-evident . For , in case neither It self , nor any thing Like it be there when we know it , 't is Impossible to imagine any reason why our Knowledge should be of It rather than of Another thing Distinct from i● ; which must necessarily confound all our Knowledges whatever . Again , since the Power of Knowing is of it self Indifferent to the Knowing This or Another ; 't is Impossible to conceive how this Indifferent Power should be Determin'd to Know This rather than Another , unless either This Object be it self in that Knowing Power , that is , in the Mind ; or something that Resembles or Represents it . 9. Preliminary VIII . Notions taken Objectively , are the Things themselves , existing in our Mind intellectually , and not the Similitude , or Representation of them only . This may be presum'd to be an Establisht Maxim , having been prov'd by so many Demonstrations in my Second Preliminary in Solid Philosophy Asserted , none of which have been hitherto Answer'd by the modern Ideists , tho' nothing more nearly concern'd them . Notwithstanding , I shall add this farther Proof of it . Words are meant to express that which is in our Mind ; that is , to express our Conceptions or Notions ▪ taken Objectively , which therefore ( thus taken ) are the Thing meant . But that which is meant by the Words , is the Thing it self ; therefore that which is in our Notion , or the Object of it , is the Thing it self . To prove the Minor , let us put this Proposition , [ There is a Similitude of the Thing it self in our Mind ; ] and then reflect , that since we understand what 's meant by all th●se words , we have a Notion of each of those Words in our Minds . Hence I argue ; Therefore there is in our Notion not only what 's meant by the word Similitude ] , but also what 's meant by the words , [ the thing it self ; ] for those words are Parts of the Proposition . But what is meant by the words [ the Thing it self ] cannot be any other but the very Thing conceived by us ; therefore the very Thing is in our Notion or Conception when we intelligently speak that Proposition . This is farther enforced , because in this Proposition , what 's meant by the words [ the Thing it self ] is Relatively Oppos'd to the Similitude or Representation of the Thing , as is evident to every Reflecter : Therefore , what 's meant by the words [ the Thing it self ] cannot possibly be the same that is meant by the word [ Similitude ] , which is formally Opposite to it . Whence those who deny the Thing is in our Minds , do at the same time unawares , confess it is there ; since they put what 's meant by [ Thing it self , ] over and above what 's meant by the word [ Similitude ] to be there . Nor were these words [ The Thing it self ] ever us'd by Mankind , ( especially when they speak Dogmatically ) to signifie A Similitude of the Thing . Lastly , If we have only Similitudes of what 's meant by our Words ; then since , ( as they will have it ) the Words [ Thing it self ] signifie only a Similitude of the Thing ; by the same reason , the Word [ Similitude ] , which is found also in that Proposition , must mean a Similitude of a Similitude ; of which who can make any Sense ? 10. But to put this out of all Doubt by Argu●… unanswerably from their own Concession ; Let us abstract any particular Notion of the Thing from the rest , and we shall see clearly , that every Similitude consists in the Unity or Identity of some Form or Act ( whether Essential o● Accidental ) which is found in the Things said to be Alike . For Example : If two Things be Alike in Quantity , or Length , v. g. each of them a Yard ; all Mankind will say , that the Same Length or the Same Quantity is ●…nd in each of them . If two Walls be Alike 〈…〉 Colour , or both of them White ; we truly say they are of the Same Colour . If two Sons be Alike ●● their Relation to one Common Father , they ●● truly said to have the Same Relation , or to be 〈…〉 of them Sons . If two Things be perfectly 〈…〉 in - Figure , v. g. both of them Triangular , we truly affirm they are of the Same Figure . If Alike in Nature , ( v. g. Manhood ) they are truly said to be of the Same Nature . For , since we consider them under such a precise Notion , and no other , and they do not at all differ under that Notion ; this Discourse is as Self-evident , as 't is , that a ●●rd is a Yard , that Whiteness is Whiteness , a 〈…〉 is a Son , a Triangle is a Triangle , or a Man ●● a Man. And , in case These , or any other , hap not to be the same , 't is because they fall short of being Perfectly Alike under that Consideration or Respect , or that some other respect is mingled with it . Hence I argue : Since our Soul works by Abstracted Notions , and conceives the Thing now under One Notion or Respect , now under Another ; and 't is granted that our Soul has ▪ ● Likeness to the Thing , as far as she conceives it ▪ or has a Notion of it ; and , by having such a Likeness of it , she must ( by § . 5. ) be truly denominated Like it ; it follows with Equal Evidence as it did in the former Instances here mentioned , that there is also an Unity , Identity , or Sameness in the Mind with the Thing , ( as far as 't is Conceiv'd ; ) which , according to it 's Proper and Natural Manner of Existing , is without us ; and that the Thing without us , as far as 't is thus inadequately and precisely Conceiv'd , is the Same with the Thing existing in our Conception or Notion . Whence follows , ( by the same evidence ) that our Mind ▪ consider'd precisely as Knowing the Thing ; and , by Knowing it , being Like it ; is the Same with the Thing Known , or truly ( after an Intellectual Manner ) that Thing . By which we may see how True , tho' Scandalous to Men of Fancy , that Saying of Aristotle is , that [ Anima intelligendo fit Omnia : ) and why he adds the word [ Quodammodo ] to hint to us the Different Manner of Being it has in the Understanding from that which it has in re . 11. Corollary I. Hence we may collect , that that Saying , [ Every Like is not the Same ] , is only True when the Things are not perfectly Alike , but are Unlike to ▪ one another in some Other Respect or Consideration ; and that it cannot be meant that they are not the Same under that Respect in which they are perfectly Alike ; this being , as was shown , contrary to the Sentiment and Language of all Mankind . Now , 't is impossible , that being ( as is granted ) Alike , they should not be perfectly Alike when we speak of them ( as we here do ) according to some One precise Respect ; Every Respect or Notion we have being Indivisible , and shut up concisely within it's own Bounds ; so that it cannot admit any Unlikeness in Another Respect , every Inadequate Notion ( as ours are ) being but one single Respect of the Thing . Wherefore the Meaning of that Saying is generally this , that it does not follow they are the same Thing , or the same according to the Notion of Thing , because they are Alike according to the Respect or Notion of some Mode or Accident , which is not the Notion of Thing , but Another ; which we easily grant without the least prejudice to our Argument ▪ which proceeds upon Likeness in such a precis● Respect and no other ; ( which therefore cannot but be a perfect Likeness ) and thence infers an Identity or Unity in that Respect only . 12. Corollary II. This Identity which our Abstracted Notion or Conception has to the Thing in Part , hinders not , but forces , that the Whole Thing is in our Mind intellectually , tho' our Conception be but of one Abstracted Considerability found in it : Only the Whole is there but Confusedly , as That to which that Metaphysical Part belongs ; and that Part Distinctly , as the Peculiar Object of our Inadequate Conception of it . In the same manner , as when we see or touch One part of a Man , v. g. his Face or Hand , we truly say we see or touch that Man , or Him ; which words signifie the Whole Man. For , since the word [ Part ] must mean a Part of Something , that is of the Whole to which it relates ; [ A Part of the Whole , ] signifies the same as [ The Whole in Part. ] Again , since ( as was demonstrated , Ch. 1. § . 27. ) there are no Actual Parts in any Compound whatever ; and , therefore , all Operations of our Minds , as well as all Actions and Passions in Nature , are of the Suppositum , or Subject , and exercis'd upon other Suppositums , or Subjects , when we know them : Hence , to know some Part of the Thing is to Know the Whole Thing Materially , tho' it be only one Part of it Formally , Expressly , and Distinctly . Whence is seen how Solid our Way of Philosophizing is ; being entirely built on the Thing it self , whose Essence is Establisht by the First Being ▪ and not on any Fantastick Similitude of it , Elicited by our Soul , or coyn'd by our Fancy . 13. It were not amiss for the more perfect Satisfaction of every Reader , who is even of an ordinary Capacity to borrow here one of those Demonstrations from my Second Preliminary aforesaid , it being at once Clearly Convictive and very Easie. 'T is this , [ We can never know the Thing certainly by a Resemblance of it , unless we know certainly that that pretended Resemblance is Like it , or truly Resembles it : Nor can we possibly know with Certainty that it resembles it , but by comparing the Resemblance with the Thing , as we do all ▪ Copies with their Originals , and all Originals with their Prototypes . Nor can we thus compare them together , without having the Thing too , as well as the Resemblance , in our Comparing Power ; that is , in our Mind , or Understanding . The Thing it self then must be in our Mind , to be there Compar'd with the Resemblance of it ; or otherwise , the Resemblance or Similitude can never be known to be ●ike the Thing ; and , so , can never make us certainly know it , nor do us any Good. And , if the Thing be there , what needs a Similitude of it to know it ; since to be in a Knowing Power is to be Known . I am to expect it will be apprehended and objected that I much wrong my Cause by putting so much stress upon the Thing 's being really in the Understanding as an Object , it being so hard to be conceiv'd , or unlikely to be granted but by a very few . To which I Answer : 14. First , That this Tenet is the Basis of all Philosophy in the World that is Solid , and that , besides my many Demonstrations in the place lately cited , and some here also , which evince it , innumerable others may be added to make good that Thesis ; divers of which may perhaps occur hereafter . The Reasons why many Witty Men are so prejudic'd against this Tenet , are chiefly Three . First , Because they do not distinguish between those different Questions [ An est ] , and [ Quid o● [ Quomodo est . ] And thence , because they cannot comprehend what the Nature of a Spiritual Operation is , or conceive How this is done ; they will needs conclude it is not done at all , or cannot be done . But how void of Common Reason this Inference is , is obvious to every Ordinary Reflecter . When we see a Thing a-far off , we know , that it is , tho' we know not yet What is is . The Rudest Vulgar knows That there are Sun , Moon , and Stars ; but they are utterly Ignorant What they are . Again , We All of us know most certainly , that the Loadstone attracts Iron ; and that we move our Hands and Feet , &c. but very Few of these All do perfectly comprehend How this is done . Now , 't is only the [ An est ] of the Things being in our Mind , or [ That it is there ] which is in Question here ; for 't is only this which we strive to evince , and not the [ Quid est ] of that Spiritual Operation , or How this is perform'd ; which perhaps is beyond any Man's Skill in this State. The Second Reason is , Because they do not distinguish between the Indivisible or Spiritual Manner of Existing which Things have in the Soul and the Proper Manner of Existing they have i● themselves , as they are out of it : Whereas , ( by § . 5. ) what 's meant by the word [ Thing ] , or the Notion of it , abstracts from both , is Indifferent to both , and consequently , can have both ▪ or either of them . And , 't is also Evident hence , that 't is granted by all who hold a First Being , that the Essences of all things , ( and amongst them , of Bodies ) and consequently those Things themselves , were , and are in the Divine Intellect after a Spiritual Manner ; and yet they exist in themselves after a Manner quite Different from the Other . Whence , it being only asserted by us , that they are in our Mind after a Spiritual Manner , their Objection is wholly grounded on their Confounding those two Manners of Being , which are most Vastly , and indeed Contradictorily Different . Nor have they any way to confute our Assertion but by Producing some Metaphysical Arguments to evince that Things cannot possibly have two such Manners of Being ; which we are confident they can never do . On the contrary , we cannot but judge we have Unanswerably Demonstrated our Affirmative , that they can have such Different Manners of Existing , and Actually have them . The Third Reason of their Dissatisfaction is , That such Objecters do not guide their Thoughts by regarding the Connexion of Terms in Propositions or Discourses ; in which , and by which only , Truth is Clearly and Certainly to be found ; but by customary . Impressions on the Fancy , begetting dive●s Phantasms there ; which being taken from Material or Corporeal Objects , must needs be very Unsutable to Spiritual Operations ; nor , consequently ▪ can they any more enable us to judge of Spiritual Natures , unassisted by Reflexion and Reason connecting our Notions , than a Blind Man is able to judge of Colours . Let then these Gentlemen correct their Thoughts as to these Three Faults , and they will quickly see what a puzzle they will be at to frame any Objection against this Thesis that will hang together ; and , on the other side , what a struggle it will cost them to solve , with any show of Reason , the Connexion of the Terms which gives force to those Demonstrations that pretend to evince this Great and most important Truth . 15. My Second Answer to those who dislike my making use of , and relying upon , such an Abstruse point , is , that Many , if not Most of my following Demonstrations will equally conclude the Immateriality of the Soul , even according to the Opinion of those who hold that only Similitudes of the Thing are in our Understanding when we know it , as they will , according to our Thesis , that the Thing it self is after a Spiritual Manner there . Wherefore , since ( by § . 8. ) Knowledge must necessarily be perform'd by one of those ways or by the other , it will far more conduce to the Evincing this Main and Fundamental Point , by showing that my Demonstrations do conclude , which soever of these Hypotheses my Readers hap to embrace . I add , that having thorowly study'd that Point , which some Men think is so Abstruse , and seeing evidently , to the very best of my Judgment , that no Objecter ever did this ; and withall , that that Point is Demonstrable , nay already Demonstrated ; and that no Objection can , with True Reason , be brought against it ; Hence I conceiv'd that I ought not to lose the Just Advantages which that True Thesis gave me to conclude such a Grand Position as is the Immortality of the Soul , ( on the truth of which all Religion fundamentally depends ) meerly because many dislike it , but neither well know , nor can give any good Reason why ; as none I have yet heard of ever gave any ▪ CHAP. VII . Of the Immateriality , and , consequently , the IMMORTALITY of Man's SOUL . 1. THAT Subject is evidently Immaterial , which Works , is Affected , or has Objects in her after an Immaterial Manner ; that is , after such a Manner as is Impossible to be found in Material or Quantitative Things . But such is that Subject call'd Man's SOUL , in respect of her Operations , and of the Objects in her : Therefore the Soul is Immaterial . The Major is Evident ; For , were the Subject Divisible , or had Quantitative Parts , whatever Mode or Object Affects it or is Received in it , must be Receiv'd in some Part , or other , of that Divisible Subject ; for , if it be in no part of it , it would not affect it at all . And if it effects or be received in some Part of that Divisible Subject , it must be Divisible , and , consequently Extended , as that Part is which receiv'd it . The Minor , which proves the contrary , is hence demonstrated ; because it is * perfect Nonsense to think that Knowledge , which is the Proper Operation of the Soul , is of such a Nature as can be measur'd by any Material Extension . This will be farther demonstrated by Innumerable Arguments . And , first , by those drawn from the Nature of Knowledge in Common . 2. Demonstration II. If the Knowledge which the Soul has were in her after a Divisible , Material , or Quantitative Manner , and , consequently her self were Divisible and Quantitative ; then , the Extent of that Quantity being Finite , the more Knowledge she gains , the nearer she would approach to being Full ; and so , be less able to hold or contain mor● . Whereas , on the contrary , we find by Experience , that the more Knowledge the Soul has in her already , she is so far from becoming Fuller , that her Capacity is by that means Enlarg●d , and she is enabled to take in still more and more . But this is directly against the Nature of a Material , that is , a Divisible or Quantitative Capacity that is Finite , as is most manifest ; since the least Quantity takes up some Space , or Room , of this Finite Container ; and , so , still lessens the Capacity of holding as much as it could before . Therefore , the Soul is of a quite Contrary , or rather Contradictory Nature to the Capacities of Quantitative or Material Subjects , and by consequence she is evidently Immaterial . 3. Demonstration III. That which has innumerable other Natures in her , without Altering or Destroying it's own Natural Constitution , is evidently Immaterial . But the Soul has Innumerable other Natures in her , ( by Preliminary 9. and 10. ) without Altering or Destroying her own ; There●●●● the Soul is Immaterial . The Major is evident , ●ecause many new peculiar Natures or Complex●●ns of Accidents , advening to the constitution of the former Material Thing , must needs affect it accordingly , and give it as many New Modifications and Determinations as there are Accidents i● it : Since , these ( by Prelim. 5. ) must each of them impart to the Subject it 's Formal Effect , and as much alter it's Nature , as Water does Wine , or Aloes does Honey ; much more when Multitudes of these Complexions of Accidents are jumbled together , they would scarce leave to that Material Entity any Remnant or Show of it's former self ; but quite pervert , efface and de●roy it's proper Temperament or Constitution . Again , those various Complications of Accidents must make the Soul , were she Material , to be of so many several Kinds , and consequently to be many Corporeal Individuums ; which would make her the most Monstrous Chimera imaginable ; and destroy her Unity and Entity both . Nay , since all those Notions which are ( taking them objectively ) those Natures and Modes , do ( ●s will be demonstrated hereafter ) remain still in the Soul , many of which are Contrary and In●●nsistent ; and , must impart to her , were she Material , their Formal Effect ; or make and denominate her such as their several Natures are : Whence she would be at once Rare and Dense , Hot and Cold , ( and this too in the Highest , and also in the Lowest Degree ) Long and Short , and of all different Quantities ; Black and White , and of all Different Colours , Moist and Dry ; Round , Square , Triangular , and of all Figures ; nay , at once Virtuous , and Vicious ; Knowing and Ignorant ; since she has the Notions or Natures of all these in her . The Minor is prov'd , ( by § . 9 , 10 , 11 ▪ ) where it was demonstrated that by having Notions of the Things according to all these Modes , she has these Modes themselves in her : which how impossible it is they should be all at once in a Material Subject , Common Sense shows every Man. 4. Demonstration IV. Hence 't is clearly evinced , that None of those Things , Natures , or Modes , which the Soul has in her by Knowing them , is an Intrinsecal Affection , Mode or Determination of the Soul it self , as are her Faculties , Thoughts , Judgments , Discourses , Affections , and such like , which do properly belong to her own Nature . Whence follows , that when they are in the Soul by her Knowing them , they are there tanquam aliud , As Another , or as Distinct from her : And therefore , that [ Knowing ] is the becoming Another Thing , as 't is Distinct from the Knower ; which , ( tho' , perhaps few reflect on it ) is no more in true Sense , than what we familiarly say , that 't is an Object of the Knowing Power , or the Thing Known ; for the words [ Object ] , and [ Thing Known ] , do import a Relative Opposition , and consequently Distinction from the Knower as such . How this piece of Doctrine may ( in part ) conduce to the Explication of the most B. Trinity , may appear in due Season ; by showiag , that the Opposition and Distinction according to the Notion of Relation , does not hinder , but rather , in our case , induce the Unity of Nature in the Knower and thing Known . 5. Demonstration V. That Tenet must necessarily be False which is contrary to the Natural Notions and Language of all Mankind ; not excepting even Atheists themselves , who deny Spiritual Beings . But such is the Tenet of the Soul's Materiality : Therefore that Tenet must necessarily be False . The Major is prov'd ; Because all our Knowledge , and all the Truths we have Naturally , are built on our Natural Notions as on their Ground . The Minor is thus manifested : It is Nonsense according to the Natural Sentiments and Language of all Mankind , to ask of any particular Knowledge , ( for Example , of our Knowledge that Two and Three make Five ) How Big , or of what Quantity or Extension it is ; v. g. whether it be an Inch , or a Yard Long , whether it be thus Broad or Thick : As also , Whether it be Rare or Dense ? Whether it be as Hard as a Stone , or as Soft as Butter ? What Figure it is of ? Whether Square , Round , Cylindrical or Octogone ? Whether it be White or Black , or of some middle Colours ? Whether it be Diaphanous or Opacous ? Whether it sends out Effluviums or Particles of it's own Nature , or no ? What kind of Place will fit it ? Whether the Parts it has do stand Erect , or lean Sloping , or lie Flat ? How we are to Act upon it by another Body's smart Impulse , shattering it's Parts asunder , or Pressing them Close , or Tearing them off by little and little ? &c. Now 't is such Nonsense to all Sober Mankind , tho' never so Sceptical , to ask such Questions , that it looks like meer Gibberish , or the playing at Cross-purposes ; and would make the Asker , if he do it seriously , be held a Mad-Man ; whereas yet it would not be thought at all Absurd to ask , at least many of these , concerning any Material Being whatever . 'T is given us then and granted by the Free and Ingenuous Acknowledgement of all Mankind , guiding themselves by their Nature-taught Notions , that this Operation of our Soul , call'd Knowledge , which is most Natural to her , ( and , consequently , that her Nature it self , ) is vastly Different from that of Material or Quantitative Beings , that is , Immaterial . 6. Thus far of Knowledge in Common . What Light is afforded us to demonstrate the Immateriality of the Soul from all her several sorts of Operations mention'd Ch. 6. § . 4. will be seen hereafter . We proceed now to examine the several Objects of the Soul's First Operation , or her several sorts of Notions ; which are comprehended in those Ten General Heads call'd Ten Predicaments . These Notions are adequately Divided into Two General Kinds , viz. Absolute and Respective : I say , Adequately , it being impossible for us to have any Conception which is not either the One or the Other . Of these , the Modes or Accidents , which take up the Nine last Predicaments , are , all of them Respective to the Thing or Substance , which they one way or other modifie ; because we cannot conceive a Mode or Manner which modifies Nothing ; ( which is the Literal Sense of that Saying of the Schools , [ Accidentis Essentia est Inhaerentia ; ] ) And the Notion of Thing , or as the Schools call it Substance , being That which is Capable of Being , or , which is the same , a Power to Existence : It follows , that the Notion of Thing relates to its Act , Existence ; and that the Ens or Substance , which is Capable to be , or is the Power to be , does respect it as such . Whence follows , that Existence has no Respect at all , in the Line of Ens , to any other Notion whatever that perfects it , there being none more Actual than it self is ; nor has it any Reference or Order to any thing but to GOD , our Creatour ; who is the Immediate Cause of it ; on whom only it depends , and whom only , of all our Natural Notions , for it's Indivisibility , Simplicity , and Actuality , it most resembles . From which Discourse 't is clearly seen , that Existence or Actual Being is the only Absolute Notion we have , and that all the rest , either Immediately ( as Ens ) or Mediately , ( as the Modes of Ens or Accidents ) are Respective to It. To begin then with the only Absolute Notion ; [ Existence ] , I argue thus . 7. Demonstration VI. That Subject is Indivisible or Immaterial that has Objects in her which are every way Indivisible , ( by § . 1. ) . But , the Soul , when she has in her the abstract Notion of Existence , has an Object in her which is every way Indivisible : Therefore the Soul it self is Indivisible or Immaterial . That the Soul has the Notion of Existence in her , is Evident by Experience ; for we know , nay cannot but know , that we have the Notion of what 's meant by the word [ is ; ] since without this we could neither Affirm nor Deny . And , 't is farther Demonstrable , because the Soul has no Notion at all in it but t●●o ' it , or in Order to it : For the Ens or Thing , with all it's Complexion of Modes in it , which constitute the Individuum , is no more formally but a meer Power to Existence ; and every Power is nothing but a kind of Order , Degree , or Step towards it's Act ; nay , 't is so Confus'd a Notion , staying in the Notion of meer Power , that 't is no way Distinctly Intelligible without some Order to the Act , from which all Distinct Knowledge in our Mind , proceeds . And , that the Notion of this most Distinct and most Perfect Act , call'd [ Existence ] , is every way Indivisible , is Evident ▪ For , it cannot be Divisible Quantitatively , or Physically , ( that is Materially ; ) since all such Division is done by way of Local Motion , that is , by Degrees , or Part after Part ; whereas there are no Degrees , or Part after Part in the Notion of meet Existence . We no sooner alter the Actual Being of a Thing , but we destroy it , and make it not-bee ? Nor is there any Middling or Gradual passage from the one to the other ; it being impossible a Thing should half-be , half-not-be , or ( which is the same ) neither be , nor not bee . Again , even in Material Things , Existence presupposes all the Matter , Quantity , and the Complexion of all the Modes which constituted the Individuum , nay , it presupposes too all the Motions that anteceded and terminated the precedent Operation of Natural Agents , which caus'd the perfect Determination of the Matter , or Power to be This Thing , which fitted it for Existence , and fixt the Thing in Actual Being , as is shown above , Ch. 5. § . 16. Nor is the Notion or Nature of Existence Divisible Metaphysically , by our framing different Conceptions of it as we do of other Objects ; for , being in it's self most Simple , 't is impossible it should afford us Ground to make different Notions of it ; as appears by this , that No Wit of Man can invent or assign a Genus or a Difference for it , nor consequently resolve it into Metaphysical Parts by Defining it : Therefore the Notion of Existence is every way Indivisible ; and , consequently it 's Subject , the SOUL , is also Indivisible and Immaterial . 8. We come now to consider those Notions which are Respective : Which directs us in the first place to re●●ect what a Respect ( in common ) means , or is ; and whether it can be any Material Thing or Mode of Thing ; or can be represented by a Material Similitude . A Respect then is an Order , Reference , or a kind of Alliance which one Thing or Mode has to another . Now who sees not that such a thing as Respect is not to be found , nor has any place in Material Nature ? There are nothing in the Material World but such and such Individual Bodies ; each of which has it's own Distinct Complexion of Accidents , by which it is aparted and Distinguisht from all others ; is Independent on them , and enjoys it 's proper Existence and Subsistence . Each stands on it's own Bottom , without having any thing to do with any other . Whence comes then this General Nature ( as it w●re ) of being Respective to others , which we observe is found in all the Notions which belong to all the last Nine Predicaments ? It is certain , that all our Notions ( except that of Existence ) are of this Respective Nature , as appears by all their Definitions . The Modes or Accidents do respect the Thing or Substance , as a kind of Form , which makes it be such , or of such ● Manner , as they are apt to determine and denominate it ; and the Thing is Capable to Exist , and so respects Existence as it's Act or Perfection : But tho' we run over the whole Beadroll of Individuums in the world , we find nothing in any of them which answers to the word Respect . Each Thing is what it is ; and it's Accidents or Modes are the Accidents of that Thing , and of no other ; or respect no other Thing but that which is their Proper Subject : And there are in Nature nothing but particular Substances and their Accidents ; nor have we ( except the Absolute Notion of Existence ) any other Natural Notions . There is indeed found in them what grounds , or gives the Reason why they should be Referr'd to another or respect it , when they are put together in a Comparing Power . But where is this Reasoning Faculty , or Comparing Power found in Matter , by which we consider , build upon , and make use of this Ground or Reason ; or , which is Attentive to lay hold of this Reason why it ought to be Referr'd , and make Things actually respect one another ; and thence actually denominate them Genera or Species , Predicate or Subject , Inherent , that is , Dependent for their Being , or Independent , which we call Subsistent : This Notion of Actual Respect then is not to be found in any of the Lordships , Territories , or Purlews of Material Nature . Hence I argue . 9. That Subject which has Affections or Determinations in her which are no where found in Matter , is Immaterial : But the Soul is the Subject of such Operations or Affections , ( viz. Actual Respects . ) Therefore the Soul is Immaterial . 10. Demonstration VIII . We come now to Quantity , and we discourse thus . We have clearly a Notion of a Yard , or of a Mile , &c. and have truly in our Mind the Meaning of those Words , and the Meaning of them is a Real Yard , and a Real Mile , and not a Similitude of them only . We can also define a Yard and a Mile ; and , therefore , since a Definition tells us the Essence of a Thing , we have , consequently , in our Souls the Essence or Nature of those Determinate Quantities ; whence the Essence or Nature of those Quantities must be in our Minds first , otherwise we should define we know not what . Wherefore , since ( by Ch. 6 ● . 6. ) the Form denominates and makes a Thing such as it self is ; when the Nature of a Yard or Mile is in the Soul , it must make our Soul a Yard or a Mile Long , if this were done after the manner of Things made of Matter : Whence , o●● Soul would be Extended a vast way out of our Body . Nay , since she has some kind of Notion of the Immense Expansion of the Heavens ; and by Reflexion multiplying it , ( as she easily may ) ▪ can also have a Notion of a Million of times more , she would stretch her self to a kind of Ubiquity . But , waving the Thesis of the Thing 's being really in our Minds as an Object when she knows it , and allowing or supposing that when we know it , there is only a Similitude or Resemblance of it there ; I would ask ▪ what can there be in Matter that can resemble a Yard , after the manner we find in Material or Corporeal things , unless it self be , some way or other , a Yard Long. It must be some sort of Quantity that can do this ; for otherwise it is quite Different from it , and so can no way resemble it ; and , if it be some Quantity , and yet it self be not a Yard Long , it must necessarily be either more than a Yard , or less than a Yard : And how can that which is more than a Yard or less than a Yard , represent this precise and distinct Quantity of a Yard ; which would not be it self , were it never so little either more or less than it is . As certain then as it is ▪ that A Yard is a Yard , or is it self , so certain it is that nothing does or can resemble it materially , but Another Yard ; which ( as is lately seen ) is in our case most Absurd and Impossible . I remember I prest this Demonstration in the year 1658. against a very Civil and Ingenious Gentleman , who was a Scholar of Mr. Hobbs's ; he reply'd , that the least Quantity imaginable might represent the greatest ; instancing in the Scale of Miles in Maps . I answer'd , that ' ere we can say , [ This very little Quantity shall stand for a very Great one , ] or , This Inch shall stand for Five or Ten Miles , we must have the exact and full Notions of Inch and Mile , in our Minds antecedently ; otherwise we could never proportion them ; nor could we even understand what The Scale of Miles meant , if we had not in our Understanding what is meant by the word [ Mile , ] that is , a Real Mile ; for , ( as is here prov'd ) even the Similitudes of a Mile must be such . And so the Question returns , and we are but where we were . 'T is most Evident then , that we cannot possibly have in our Minds either the Nature or the Similitude of a Mile , after the manner it is found in Matter . Wherefore , it is in us , quite otherwise , that is , Immaterially . And , since it has not this Manner of Being from the Things which are without us , ( for there it is Divisibly or Extendedly ) it follows necessarily , that it has it from it's new Subject , the Soul ; and , consequently , that the Soul , which imparts to the Nature of Quantity such an Indivisible Manner of Being , is it self Immaterial . 11. Demonstration IX . From that kind of Continu'd Quantity , now spoken of , which is Permanent , we come to consider that other sort of Continu'd Quantity , which is Successive , call'd Motion . This Succession or Motion , tho' it has it's Degrees of Slowness or Vel●city ; yet , while it endures , as it is in Matter or Nature , it flows or goes on in one Even Undistinguisht Tenour , without any Butts or Bounds terminating it here or there . Now , for Instance , Let 's consider this Regular Motion of the Heavens , or of the Sun , call'd Time ; and we shall find , that we have Notions of such Parts of it , call'd an Hour , a Day , a Year , an Age , &c. Distinct from any other Quantity of it , as much as we have of any two Individual Things which are most perfectly Distinguisht in Nature . Wherefore , since this Motion , call'd Time , as it is in Material Nature , has no such Actual Distinction of it's Parts ; plainest Reason assures us , that it has another different Manner of Being , as it is in the Soul , than it has in Matter ; for , in Matter , it's Parts were only Potential , and utterly Undistinguisht ; but in the Soul they are all Actual , and most exactly Distinguisht . Wherefore , since the Manner of Being they have in Nature , is confessedly Material ; it follows , that that contradistinct Manner of Being they have in the Soul must forcibly be Immaterial ; and , consequently , the Soul it 's self , which gives them that vastly distinct Manner of Being , must necessarily it self be Immaterial also . 12. Demonstration X. Divers other Demonstrations might be drawn from the same Head : I shall select ▪ one . No two parts of Time , ( or of any other kind of Motion ) as it is in re , or in Material Nature , can be present at once without a manifest Contradiction ; for it would make some Successive Quantity to be Simultaneous or Unsuccessive ; But , in the Mind many , and great Portions of Time are at once Present : For we could not work interiously , or discourse of a Day , v. g. or a Year , by Dividing , Multiplying or Proportioning their parts , if those parts were not all at once in our Minds ; which , since , as was shown , they could not be as they are in Material Nature , they must therefore be there Immaterially ; and , consequently , our Mind , their Subject , is Immaterial . Which is enforced by this , that both Past and Future Parts of Time exist in the Soul when she has a Notion of them ; whereas 't is direct Contradiction to say they can actually exist in re or in Matter : Add , That our Soul comprizes as much of Time as she pleases in one Notion , as a Day , a Year , &c. which remains there as steadily , and grounds all her Notions about it as firmly , as if it were the most Stable Thing in Nature . So that the very Notion of Succession is in the Soul Permanently , or Unsuccessively ; which is directly contrary to it's Nature as it passes in the Material World. 13. Demonstration XI . The same may be said of Discrete Quantity or Number . There is nothing in Nature but Individuals , each of which is properly an Ens , and consequently , Unum ; and therefore , if we put a Multitude , the Unity they had in Nature is lost ; since One cannot be Many ; nor Many , One ; and this is all the Unity we find among Individual Beings as they are in Matter , or out of the Soul. Now , when the Soul takes Many or More of these together ; she bundles up even those Incommunicable , Actual , and perfectly Distinct Individuums , at her pleasure ; and tho' they were never so many , she p●●ches upon what Quantity of them she lists to take notice of , and gives even their Singularit●●s a new sort of Unity in her Notion , which Nature never gave them ; and calls this Notion which comprizes them all Three , Ten , or a Hundr●● , or what she pleas●s . Which since it depends on her Choice how many she will take of them , 't is Evident , that this Union was not given them by the Being which they had in Material Nature . Or out of the Soul , where they were altogether Distinct , and one of them has nothing to say to the other . And , let it be noted , that this Union is not made , as Universal Notions are , by Abstraction , or our leaving out the Particular Considerations belonging to the Species or Inferiour Notion , and only taking in one Common Consideration found in them all , there being a fair Ground in Nature to consider them on that fashion ; But this Colligation of many into One Number is a kind of Union of those whole Individuums in despite of the multitude of their Singularities ; and a Reducing those Things which are ultimately Determin'd , Distinct and stand aloof from one another , as they are in Material Nature , to a Close Unity ; compacted so Indivisibly and Indissolubly , that the least part added or detracted , that Unity is specifically alter'd , and presently becomes another kind of Number . Lastly , which makes this Point yet more Evident ; We can have a Material Resemblance in our Fancy of Four , Five , or some small number of Natural Things ; and have in our Heads a kind of Picture of them ( as it were ) standing all on a Row. But 't is impossible for us to have such a Lively , and exactly-Just Picture of a Hundred , a Thousand , a Million , &c. so as to see clearly there is not one more or less ; and yet we experience that we can have most Clear , Distinct , and Exact Notions of These , as well as we can have of Two or Three ; Nor do we look upon those Great Numbers by the Eye of our Understanding , as a Confused Heap or Multitude , as it happens when we see a great Croud of Men standing together ; but with a clear and perfect Discernment that they are just so many , not one more or less ; and this as easily as we can know Four or Five . Since then , in the way of Matter , nothing can resemble a Thousand but a Thousand , ( for the Resembler must be some sort of Number , otherwise it is not at all Like it ; and , neither One more nor less ; that it is must it self be a Thousand ) it follows , that the Distinct and Exact Notions we have of very great Numbers , is Immaterial ; and , consequently , the Soul , their Subject , is such also . 14. Demonstration XII . Come we now to these Notions which belong to the Head of Quality ; which , because they are Innumerable , we will instance in Two of them , Sensible Qualities , and Figure . As for the First of these , If when we have the Notion of a Sensible Quality , v. g. Dry or Moist , the Thing or Body thus affected be in our Mind , and consequently the Nature of those Qualities , we have gain'd our Point , and prov'd , it is in us Immaterially , it being evidently impossible a thing should have two Material Manners of Existing . Nor can these Qualities be there by some Material Representation or Resemblance ; For what can resemble ▪ Dryness or Moistness ? Whatever it be , it must be some other Sensible Quality ; for , otherwise , it would be utterly Unlike it ; and the same would happen , were it a Sensible Quality belonging to some other Sense than that of the Touch , v. g. were it Whiteness or Fragrancy , which belong to the Sight and Smell . 'T is Evident then , that nothing but Dryness it self can represent Dryness materially . Wherefore , it must either be said , that Dryness it self is in the Soul Immaterially , or not at all ; and yet , that we have i● , in us , we are satisfi'd , in regard we have it in our Notion , and can discourse of Dryness it self . Again , if Dryness , Moistness , and all other Sensible Qualities be in the Soul materially when she knows them ; then , as they did in Material Nature affect their other Material Subject , according to the peculiar Genius of each , ( by Ch. 6. § . 6. ) so they must affect the Soul too after the same Manner , and make her materially Dry and Moist . And , moreover , since no Notions are ever blotted out of the Soul , she would also be at once , Moist and Dry , Hot and Cold , White , Black , Blue , Green , and of all Colours , Rough and Smooth , Fragrant and Stinking , Diaphanous and Opacous ; and imb●'d with a thousand other Contrary Qualities ; which finee they could not be all of them Agreeable to any Material Nature , ( each of them having a peculiar Constitution of it's own ) they must needs Disorder , Distemper , and Corrupt it ; the Effects of which the Man must necessarily experience , if the most Frincipal Part of him , the Soul , were made of Matter ; and they would render the Compound affected with many Diseases : whereas yet none ever found himself in the least Distemper'd , Griev'd or Pain'd ▪ by having in his Mind the Notions of all these Opposite Qualities , and ill-agreeing Dispositions . 15. Demonstration XIII . This is farther enforced , because , were the Soul ( which is confest to be our Knowing Power ) Material , all these Opposite Qualities , when they are in that Power , or Known , must be perpetually Fighting , Contrasting and Expelling one another out of their Subject ; at least they would Refract one another's Nature , and make it otherwise than it was , to some Degree ; as they do in Material Things , or Bodies . Whereas we experience that they ami●ably cohabit in the Soul ; and are so far from ( ●●pelling one another out of the Knowing Power , that they draw their Contraries into it ; and each ●●tters one another as an Object , and makes it more distinctly Knowable ; according to that ●●●axim , Contraria juxta se posita magis elucescunt . Wherefore , since to put those Sensible Qualities ●ither Themselves to be in our Mind after the manner they are in Matter , or as Material Similitudes of them , is in every respect such Incon●●stent Nonsense ; they must be in our Soul Im●aterially ; or ( which is the same ) our Soul is ●n Immaterial Subject . 16. Demonstration XIV . The same is Demonstrated ( if possible ) more evidently from the Notion of Figure . For the Soul has in her the Figures of all things that ever enter'd into the Senses , and can frame to her self Millions of others ; Nor is any thing that is once in her ( as will be prov'd ) ever blotted out of her , but ( while she is in this state and cannot work without the Body ) they are reposited there habitually as it were , nor can be brought actually into Play till re-excited . Hence I argue thus : Were these Numberless Figures in her Materially , then each of them ( by Prel . 6. ) must make the Soul , their Subject , such as themselves are ; Wherefore the Soul would be at once Round ▪ Square , Triangular , Quadrate , Chiliagone , C●nical , Cylindrical , &c. Nay , but an Inch Long ▪ and yet at the same time as Long as a Yard , or a Mile ; she having in her the Natures or Notions of all these . Whence also , ( besides the manifest Impossibility of such a Position , ) those Figures , interfering with one another , would , all of them , be defaced and blunder'd , and leave nothing but one Confus'd and Indeterminate Figure , of which we could never have any Notion : Whereas yet 't is Evident by Experience that we have a Clear and Distinct Notion of each of them ; and can judge and discourse about each of them as exactly as if we had none but that one Figure in our Mind . If it be reply'd by the Atheists , that our Soul being Material , these Figures may be in several Parts of her ; besides the Incredibility that the Soul should have so many thousand several Apartments in her , and that one of them should just light into that one Part , and no other hit upon the same place and so confound that former ; we may , moreover , reflect that each of those Figures are not represented to our Mind in a small Imperceptible Extension , but in a very Visible or Large Appearance ; and therefore , when there are so many thousands of them , their Quantity , so often multiply'd , would be extended to a vast Space beyond our Body , as was shown above § . 10. Wherefore it is concluded , that 't is absolutely Impossible those Figures , thus clearly and distinctly known , should be in our Soul materially , or Quantitatively , or as such Qualities are in Matter ; and that , therefore the Soul , their Subject , is necessarily Immaterial . 17. Demonstration XV. We experience that we 〈…〉 in us ▪ Universal Notions , or ●…er Notions of an Universal , 〈…〉 of Man , Body or Ens in Com●… ; and the same may be said of the Summum Genus of every Accident or Mode , viz. Quantity , Quality , &c. 〈…〉 their respective Species . We find we can dis●…rse , nay write whole Treatises of each of ●…ose Universals , as such ; nay more , that each 〈…〉 them has a kind of Unity belonging to it self , which it had not in Nature , or Matter , where ●ere is found nothing but Individuums constituted and Determin'd by such a Complexion of Accidents ; none of which are found in Universals , which are Indetermin'd and abstract from them all . Therefore this Manner of Existence which Universals ▪ have in the Soul , is contrary to the Nature of Existing in Matter ; and , consequently , both they and the Soul , by which , and in which , Universals have this manner of Existence , are Immaterial . 18. Demonstration XVI . The same is clearly Demonstrated from the Soul's Manner of Working by Abstract Notions . For Example , we can frame divers Abstract Notions or Conceptions of the Self-same Individual Thing ; v. g. a Stone ; which we can consider as Extended , hard , Rough , Cold , Moist , Heavy , Round , &c. And thence have the Abstract Notions of Quantity , Hardness , Roundness , &c. Now , that which is signify'd by each of those Words being materially the Thing it self , ( in regard they have of their own Nature no Being , nor are Capable of Being of themselves alone ) and yet none of them being the Whole Thing ; it follows , that the Thing , by being thus diversely conceiv'd , becomes evidently , some way or other , Divided by our Mind , or as it is there : For one of those Parts after it is thus separated or Divided by the Mind is not , in the Mind , Another , since ▪ they are deny'd of one another : Quantity is not Weight , nor is Roundness , Roughness ; and the same may be said of all the rest . Hence I argue . It is Evident , that there is some kind of Division of that Whole Thing made in our Mind , when the Thing is thus Abstractedly , Partially or Inadequately Conceiv'd : But this Division is not made after a Quantitative or Material Manner ; for those parts of Body which are Divided Materially , do , after the Division is made , exist apart in Nature , and become so many Wholes , as is manifest in a Lump of Earth or Lead ; whereas these Parts , thus Separated by the Soul , cannot exist at all but in the Whole and by it's Existence , having none of their own . Therefore , this Division made by the Soul , conceiving the Thing by piece-meal , is made after a manner not competent to Material Parts , or a Material Divider : Wherefore , this manner of Division , and , consequently , the Soul , that made it , and is the Subject in which 't is made , is of an Immaterial Nature . 19. Demonstration XVII . This leads us to the Second Operation of our Understanding , Iudging ; which Compounds again ▪ those thus-divided Parts . Iudging then is an Actual Referring or Comparing the Predicate to the Subject , in order to see the Truth or Falshood in Propositions ; which Referring ( when either done interiourly in the Mind , or exprest in Words ) we call Predicating ; whence also we ●…sely refer those Predicates , which , as they 〈…〉 our Minds , are diversely Referrable to the S●…ect ; as is seen in the Predicables of Porphyrius . B●● this Referring Actually one Notion or Thing ●…other cannot be perform'd by Matter , ( as is ●…'d above , § . 8 , 9. ) where we argu'd from 〈…〉 Notion of Respect in common . Again , All o●● Predication is a Composition , and such a one as answers to the Division lately made , ( which it ●…upposes ) and therefore is of the same Nature ●… ▪ But , that Division ( as is prov'd § . 18. ) could not be made by a Material Agent ; nor , consequently , could this Composition which answers ●o it , and is of the same Nature , be made by such an Agent . Therefore the Soul , in which this Composition is made , is Immaterial . Of this Metaphysical Composition and Division , see Chap. 1. ● . 23. 20. Corollary I. Hence is clearly seen the reason why Angels do not thus Divide and Compound , when they know , but all passes in them by Simple and Simultaneous Intuition , viz. Because they have no Abstracted Conceptions ; as having no Senses which receive Different Impressions from Outward Objects , as we have ; and therefore they cannot frame Iudgments , as we do , by Connecting Notions or Predicating . Whence , they must either not know at all , which is against the nature of an Intelligence or Intellectual Creature , which is a Pure Act ; or else they must know the Whole Thing at once Intuitively . 21. Demonstration XVIII . But to come nearer that Operation of our Soul call'd Iudging . All our Affirmative Judgments are ( as Logick shows ) made by the Copula [ is , ] which connects the two Terms : But 't is impossible to conceive that what is meant by [ is ] should be represented by a Material Resemblance ▪ A Painter may delineate Caesar but 't is impossible to Pourtray by Particles of Matter , tho' never so artificially laid together , that Caesar [ is ] or [ was , ] He may paint him Fighting , and ( putting that Action had ever been ) it would signifie he was once , because What Acts , IS : But , what Pencil , or what Colours , can ever signifie that that Action ever [ was ? ] This must come from an Intelligent Mind , which , having the Notion of [ Existence ] in it , consented it should be signify'd by [ is , ] or [ was ; ] or else it must ever remain Unknown , tho' Apelles had set himself to resemble it . The most Delicate Subtilty of Parts can no more avail here than if it had been drawn in those of the largest size ; Actual Being , as we experience , abstracts from , or is Indifferent to Greatness and Littleness ; and all the Materials which a Painter uses are Indifferent to Being and Not-being , and are equally apt to re●●●sent things that are , as things that are not . ●dd , that whatever is pourtray'd by Matter , must have part after part , or one part out of another ; whereas the Notion of Existence , or that which is signify'd by the word [ IS , ] is every way Indivisible , and has no parts at all , as is shown , Demonstration 6. 22. Demonstration XIX . The same is ( perhaps ) more forcibly demonstrated from the Third Operation of our Mind , Discourse , or Ratiocination . For First , this consists of Propositions and Judgments , and therefore is prov'd , Dem. 19. and 21. ) not to be perform●ble by Matter . Secondly , Discourse is the Deducing a Conclusion , from the Connexion which the two Extremes in the Premisses have with a Third ; which kind of Connexion is call●d Inference , Deduction , P●●ving , Argumentation , Ratiocination ; and , if the Medium be Proper , Demonstration . Discourse then being evidently such a Connexion of Propositions , I ask , In what Soil or Territory in Nature do Propositions grow ? Not in Material Nature ; since no Division or Composition of those kind of Metaphysical Parts , of which Propositions consist can be made in Matter , or performed by a Material Divider or Compounder , as has been lately shown . Again , to what Material Cement , or Connecting Virtue , conceiveable in Bodies , can this Close Coherence , which ( if the Terms be Proper and rightly order'd , is absolutely Indissoluble ) owe it's Origine ? Nor to Quantity , whose Coherence is Continuity ; for this is by a great force Dissoluble , whereas the Connexion we speak of is above all Material Force ; Nor can all the Strength or Nerves of Natural Causes , strain'd to exert their utmost Efforts , not that of Canons shattering the Hardest-Walls , or of Powder riuing asunder the most impenetrable Rocks , be able to solve a Good Argument , or tear in pieces the Connexion of it's Terms . Nor can their Indissolubleness be owing to some Tenacious or Glutinous Quality . Nor are those parts of a Conclusive Discourse hook'd or clung together by means of their Figure , as Epicurus pretended of his Atomes : Nor any way but by the Reason of the Sequel or Consequence , which ( as has been demonstrated in my Method , B. 3. L. 1. § . 3. ) is built on a self-evident or Identical Proposition ; which First Truth is so Invincibly Strong , that sooner may all Material Nature crumble to Dust , and be reduced to a Chaos , than such a Proposition can be Solv'd or made False . Wherefore this Connexion of Notions found in our Judgments which are True , is of a Strength above all Matter or Quantity ; and of a more Stable , and , consequently , of a Superiour Nature to all Material Beings : Whence follows , ( that both It , and the Subject in which it is , the Soul , ) are Immaterial . 23. Demonstration XX. The same is evidently deduced hence , that all the Notions in the Soul are most determinately such to an Indivisible ; even tho' they be of things which in their own Nature , as they stand in Matter , are Indeterminate . For Example : There ●●●● Body in Material Nature which is exactly ●● Mathematically Square , Round or Triangular , ●● reason of the perpetual turmoil of Natural Causes Acting and Re-acting ; which , making Impressions upon one another , are perpetually 〈◊〉 their Surfaces or Figures : Nay , tho' Art ●oes it't utmost to assist Nature by drawing Fi●●●●● with the most Exact Instruments , yet a 〈◊〉 Microscope will tell us , that there will be 〈◊〉 Extancies , Cavities and Irregularities , which 〈◊〉 not with the Figures which are in our 〈◊〉 : Whence were they not more accurately ●●●●●ated in our Minds than they can be drawn ●● Matter , all our Mathematical Demonstrations , which proceed upon their being such to an ●ndivisible , would be render'd Incondusive . From whence it comes , that we fancy to our selves ●●●ts in Lines , and Instants in Time , which are ●● Indivisibles . Nay , 't is Evident , That all No●… whatever do admit of no Degrees , but are Indivisibly such as we conceive them ; and are 〈◊〉 to Numbers , in which the least Addition ●● Detraction alters it quite , and makes it ano●… ▪ Which appears hence , because every least 〈◊〉 in any of them , if known by us , is a ●●w Respect , or a New Consideration , that is , a ●●w Notion . Whence is concluded , That the ●●ject , our Soul , which gives these Modes an ●●●●visible Being in her self , which they had not ●● Matter , is also it self of an Indivisible and Immaterial Nature . 24. Demonstration XXI . Hence is demonstrated , that the Soul is of her own Nature a Pure Act ; it being the Property of the Act to Determine , and of the Power or Matter to cause Indetermination and Conf●sion ; Whence follows , that that which Determines most perfectly , or to an Indivisible , has no Matter at all in it ; but is of it 's own peculiar Nature ; and , consider'd according to her self only , a Pure Act , and therefore Immaterial . 25. Demonstration XXII . Numberless are the Demonstrations , and ( to the shame of Atheists be it spoken ) as many as the Soul has particular Acts or Objects , to evince her Immateriality , and consequently , her Immortality . I have rather hinted a few of them here , than endeavour'd to enumerate them all , or pursue them home , as they might deserve . Only I hope , that the Grounds I have laid , and the Way I have taken in my Proofs , may exci●● some others to add many other Demonstrations , ( as occasion invites ) and enforce these I have here touch'd upon , to a fuller and clearer Eviction of this Preliminary Point to all Religion . I shall only add this Last Demonstration . We have Notions in our Minds of Indivisibles , of Negations , Privations , of Non-Ens , of Chimera's , of Chrystal Mountains , a Golden Earth , and innumerable such , which we can frame to our selves at pleasure . We are most Certain , all these are in our Minds , as Objects of our Simple Apprehensions because we know , and have in us the Meanings of those Words which signifie them ; as also , because we can , by our Iudgment , admit some of them as Possible , and reject others as Impossible ; which we could not do , unless we had the Natures ( as it were ) of each of them in our Understanding before we come to judge of them ; otherwise we should Admit and Reject we know not what , nor why ; which we are sure we do not . Nay , we can by a Reflex Act , have a Notion of their Formalities as Distinct from , or Superadded to the Subjects they are conceiv'd to affect : Now none of these , ( formally conceiv'd ) can , with any shew of Sense , have any Being in Nature or Matter , some of them being formally Non-Entities , others Chimerical , which is in a manner the same . Therefore this Distinct Being they have in our Mind , as Objects of our Simple Apprehension , is most incontestably Immaterial ; and therefore their Subject , the Soul , is such also . To clear the Meaning of some Words we have us'd , and to meet with some Objections , I thought fit to subjoyn these following Notes . 26. Note I. I fear that when we say , the Soul is of an Indivisible Nature , some Readers who are not well vers'd in Metaphysicks , should be apt to apprehend that we take the word [ Indivisible , ] in a Mathematical Sense , and mean she is Indivisible as a Point is ; or so little , that there is not Space enough for the least possible Divider to come between the Parts of it , and , so Divide it : And hence they may imagine it Inconceiveable , that all these several Notions or Natures of things which are in our Knowledge , and so many Innumerable Operations should all be Compriz'd and Transacted in so narrow a room as is a Point , or a Quantitative Indivisible . But the thing is quite otherwise . Those kind of Indivisibles , call'd Points , and such like , have no Positive Being in Nature ; but , because we must conceive a Finite Line , whose every Part ( it being some Quantity ) is Divisible , has an End ; hence , this End , or ( as we may call it ) No-fartherness of Quantity is no Quantity , and therefore ( Quantity being Divisibility ) it is not Quantitative , nor Divisible , but Indivisible . Now , those Ends or Not-Beings of Quantity we call Points or Surfaces , according to the Respective Quantities which they are conceiv'd to terminate . So likewise Continuative Indivisibles , which some do imagine in Quantity , and suppose them to be in the midst of all Quantitative Beings , can mean no more in any good Sense , but that , let us divide any Continu'd Quantity where we please ; the Parts , when Divided , becoming so many Wholes , will , for the same reason , be each of them Terminated , as that Greater Whole was ; Whence some conceit , that these result , as it were , from that Division ; only they change their Office , and are become Terminative now , whereas they were before Continuative ; and that they were potentially in that Former Whole before , and are only of late Discluded . For , Because we call this sort of Quantity Continu'd , it being the Genius of such Mis-Speculaters , whenever they are at a plunge , to invent some New Entity to do the Job , they cannot apprehend how Quantitative Parts should cohere , but by this Cement of Continuative Indivisibles . Not considering that 't is the Nature , Entity , or Unity peculiar to Quantity , to be Continu'd of it's self : For , it 's Essence being Divisibility , and what 's Divisible , or has only a Power to be Divided quantitatively , ( or a Power to be made More according to the Respect of Quantity ) not being Actually thus Divided ; and , what 's not Actually thus Divided , or made more , is ( out of the force of the Terms ) Actually One according to the notion of Quantity , which kind of Quantitative Unity we call Continuity , to contra-distinguish it from Discrete Quantity , the Parts of which are actually and really Divided and Separated , and only Ty'd into One Number by the Operation or Consideration of the Mind , as is shewn above : Hence , whatever Bodies have Quantity in them , are by It , as by the Formal Cause , Quantitatively One , or Continu'd , without any other assistance . Another Reason , or rather the main Errour which led those Schoolmen into that Groundless Conceit , was their Fan●ying that there are Actual Parts in every Compound ▪ particularly in Quantity ; the contrary to which is Demonstrated , Ch. 1. § . 27. No wonder then , such a Fundamental Truth in Metaphysicks being violated , those Gentlemen have faln into these absurd Tenets about Indivisibles ; especially being apt to conceit , that whenever we have a diverse Conception or Notion in our Mind , there is a New Entity in re answering to it adequately ; even tho' sometimes the Object of that Conception be purely a Non-Ens . 27. Note II. When therefore we say , that an Angel or a Soul is Indivisible , however we are forced to use a Negative Manner of Expression , because we have no Proper Notion of a Spiritual Substance ; we do not intend to express by that word a meer Negation , as we did in those Indivisibles call'd Points ; but the most Positive Being that can be , next to that of GOD himself . Which I show thus . Ens , and all other Common Notions , ( as is Demonstrated in my Method to Science , B. 1. L. 3. ) is Divided by More and Less of the Common Notion of Ens ; or ▪ by being more Capable of Being or Existing . Thus far Logick ; which teaches us how to Divide our General Notions by Proper , or Intrinsecal Differences : The Supreme Science of Metaphysicks , which treats of the Essence of Things , takes up the Thesis , and pursues it thus . The Essence or Nature of Body , consisting of Power and Act , or Matter and Form , has , consequently , in it's Bowels a Ground of . Separability of one from the other , or of Dissolution and Destruction of that Compound Ens ; whenee it is Less Capable of Being , as having a constant Capacity of Not-Being woven into it's very Nature : Whereas , the other Species of Ens , [ Spirit , ] being of it's own peculiar Nature , or as 't is contradistinguisht from Body , a Pure Act , without any Power in it to become another Ens , that is , without Matter in it ; has , on the contrary , no Composition in it , nor Power , by means of which it might come to lose it's Act or Form ; and , therefore , it is of it 's own Nature Indissoluble , ●ncorruptible , and Immortal . The very Terms evincing , that what has no Composition in it as to it's Entity , is of it's own Nature Incapable of Dissolution as to it 's Entity ; that is , ( not Mathematically Indivisible , as our former Note shew'd , but ) Metaphysically or Entitatively Indivisible ; and therefore not obnoxious to lose it's Unity or Entity . Wherefore , the best , most Positive , and most Proper Notion we can have of a Spiritual Being , is , that it is a Pure Act , which has an Incomparably Greater Capacity of Being than Body has ; and consequently it is of a Superiour and far more Noble Nature in the Line of Ens. Whence follows , that it comprehends eminently in it self the whole Inferiour Nature of Body ; and , being a Pure Act essentially , and consequently essentially Active , ( or rather Acting ) it has a Power or Virtue in it , ( if nothing hinders it's proceeding to Action ) to order , dispose of or alter that Inferiour and meerly Passive Ens , [ Material Nature , ] as it pleases . 28. Note III. The Spiritual Nature of the Soul then transcending in it's Essence this Corporeal World , made of the Perishable Rubbish of Base Matter ; and , thence , containing in it self after a manner Proper to it's own Nature , that is Intellectually or Indivisibly , ( taking this word as explain'd above ) all the Natures , Powers , Modes , Operations , Existence , Duration , Succession , &c. that ever did or can belong to Material Nature : there can be no wonder that all these ( as we have shown in our several Demonstrations ) are compriz'd , and can exist in the Soul 's Spiritual Nature , as in a Higher Orb of Being ; comprehending , after it's manner , all that can be in the Lower and Narrower one of Body . Nor can it shock any considerate Man , that the Operations proper to the Soul should be Inexplicable according to Physical Principles , or transcend the Notions of Bodily Substances , and their Modes , which we receive by means of the Senses and the Phantasms they imprint , which makes them so unsuitable to Fancy ; and yet I am sure this is all that the Impugners of this Doctrine have to build upon or object : For ▪ not one Objection drawn from a Metaphysical Medium did they ever produce ; tho' nothing is more Evident , than 't is , that only These can have any force against us , or do them any service . 29. Note IV. As my First and Second Note show ▪ how grosly those short-sighted Speculaters do mistake , while they conceit that the Essence of the Soul is Indivisible after the manner of a Mathematical Point ; so they fall into a parallel Errour , by misunderstanding me , when I say , that all the Operations of a Spiritual Nature are perform'd in an Instant . For , they imagine , that I mean by the word [ Instant , ] an Indivisible of that Successive Motion , call'd Time ; Whence their Fancy is stunn'd , and they are at a strange Wonderment to conceive how so many several Acts , following ( as it were ) and depending on one another , can be begun and ended in one such Instant . Whereas , tho' I use the Word , partly , ( arguing ad h●minem ) because They do so ; partly , because 't is hard to find another Word to signifie the Opposite to Succession ; yet I mean there by the word [ Instant ] such an Indivisible Duration , as is directly Contradictory to the whole Nature of Quantitative Succession , and corresponds ( if that improper word , which signifies a kind of Commensuration , may be here allow'd ) to all the Successive Motion Bodies ever had , or can have ; nay , which eminently comprehends it all , under the Notion of Duration , ( as was shown lately ) as the Essence of a Spirit , being of a Superiour Nature , does ( as was shown lately ) eminently comprehend in it self the Essence of Body under the Notion of Ens or Being . Nay , it seems to differ from Eternity ( which is the Duration proper to GOD , and which in an Inferiour Degree it resembles ) only in this , that it does not include Impossibility of not-being ; for it centers in it self ●● the Differences of Time , Past , Present and Fu●●●● by comprehending them all , and therefore is call'd Aeuiternity . Wherefore ; when I say that all the Spiritual Operations of a Spirit are in ●…stant , I only mean , that they have such a Duration as befits a Pure Act , which being devoid ●● Matter , and , consequently of Quantity , can have no Successiveness in it . Whence , pursuing ●…sely , and keeping strictly to the Reflex Notions I ●ave of Spiritual Nature as contradistinguisht from that which is Material or Corporeal , and from , the Duration Proper to each of them , I must beg leave to recede , in this particular , from s●me Philosophers and Divines of most celebrated ●ame , and Greatest Eminency ; and to declare , that I cannot at all conceive what a First and Se●…h Instant in the Duration of a Pure Act , ( or a Spirit ) can signifie . For , since their Duration has no Parts after Parts , as the Successive Duration of Bodies has , if it endures or is at all , it has it's Whole Duration ; and , so , all Second and Third Instants are Insignificant , and seem to have their Origin from an Imaginary Correspondence to a Mathematical Instant of Time ; which Mistake we have lately rectify'd . And , seeing Succession , in what ever Thing or Mode of Thing it is , must signifie Part after Part , which ( as both Logick and Metaphysicks demonstrate , ) is the very Notion of Quantity ; whoever puts Succession , or Part after Part , in any Modes belonging to a Pure Act , or a Spirit , does put those Modes , and , consequently , it 's Subject , to be Quantitative or Material ; that is , he puts A Pure Act to be no Pure Act , which is a Contradiction . 30. From the foregoing Demonstrations , that the Soul is Immaterial , our Grand Conclusion is Demonstratively evinc'd , That Man's Soul is IMMORTAL . First , Because , being Immaterial , she is a Pure Act in the Line of Being ; whence she has no Composition in her under the Notion of Ens ; only which can render her capable of Dissolution or losing her Unity ; and , consequently , her Entity . Secondly , Because Matter is the only Power to become a New Ens ; and , consequently , the only Principle of Corruption or Mortality , that is , of Mutation according to the Notion of Entity , as has been demonstrated , Ch. 1. § . 19. Lastly , Because for what reason Bodies are corruptible , viz. Because , they are compounded of Matter and Form ; for the same reason , the Soul being Immaterial , or a Pure Act , is Incorruptible or Immortal . So that we may as well deny that Bodies can be Corrupted , as affirm , that the Soul can die or cease to be ; either by her own Nature , she having no Ground of losing her Being , in her own Intrinsecal Constitution ; nor by the Operation of all Natural Causes ; because all their Action has Passion answering to it , which cannot be produced , when there wants the only Passive Principle , Matter . She can then only lose her Existence by the Omnip●●ence of her Great Creatour working Mirac●●ously ; nor , can it be , that it should work this ; unless it be Agreeable to his other Divine Attributes ; and it has been as yet never shown by any , that Annihilation can consist with them ; but , on the contrary , it has been shown by us , that it is hi●hly . Repugnant to them . See Raillery De●… ▪ from Pag. 41. to pag. 52. MEDITATION . AT length , my Soul , after a tedious Iourney of thy Thoughts , travelling thro' all the vast Reg●●● of those Inferiour Essences of ●odies , thou hast arriv'd at thy Self ▪ Thy Individuation , which g●●● thee thy particular Degree of Rationality , is , in this State , best learn'd ▪ from thy Material Compart ; to whose Pre-existent size and pitch thou wast adjusted ; but thy Peculiar Nature it self , can only be known from the Genius of ●● Interiour Operations as they proceed from Thee , and are Proper to thee . But , ●ow , or by what Vehicle , came the Knowledge of those Operations into thy Understanding ? They are , as has been shown at large , Immaterial , and of a Contrary Nature to Quantitative Beings ; whence , they could not enter by the Senses , nor be imprinted as those Natural Notions were which were Directly Stampt in thee . Nothing therefore but thy own Reflexion , comparing thy Operations with those of Bodies ; and seeing These to be of a quite Contrary Genius to Those , could give thee this knowledge of thy self . Which shews that the First Lesson to be learn'd by all those Speculaters who study Thee , is , that they m●●● abstract from Fancy , and lay aside , and transcend all the Objects of our Senses and all Corporeal Phantasms ; otherwise they can never reach thy Indivisible Essence ; tke want of knowing which Preliminary Rule has made so many Unskilful Thinkers degrade their own Soul from the Dignity which the Author of ▪ Nature has given it ; and to apprehend it to be Material or Mortal . 'T is only the Connexion of Notions , ( the Proper Act of the Comparing Power ▪ call'd REASON ) in which all Formal Truth consists , which could elevate thy Thoughts above th●se Baser Objects , and bring thee to frame a Iust Conception of thy Self . Our Body cannot see it 's own Face but by Reflexion from a Looking-glass ; Nor canst thou gain knowledge of thy Immaterial Essence ▪ but by the Spiritual Mirrour of thy own Understanding ; which Reflects thee upon thy self , by considering the nature oF thy own Interiour Acts , and how they differ from those which are produced by Bodily Substances . Nothing is easier to discern than 't is , that all Corporeal Operations are perform'd Part-after Part , and therefore have Parts or Quantity in them ▪ Nor is any consideration more facil and obvious than to conclude thence that their Subjects are , of their own Nature , Dissoluble , Perishable , and ( if they be Living Things ) Mortal . And , I may presume , ●● have seen Demonstrations enow alledg'd to manifest , that the Operations of our Soul , and of all the Objects , as they are in her when she knows them , and , consequently , our Soul her self , which is their Subject , is of a quite Contrary , or rather Contradictory Nature ; and , therefore , is Incorporeal , Immaterial , Unquantitative , Indissoluble and Immortal . Nay , ●●● sh●wn , § . 4. That the Natural Notions of all 〈…〉 who use even Common R●●●●xion , does in a manner imbue ●● with this Sentiment . Which ren●ers the Atheists void o●…ll Exc●se ; and give● us just occasion to fear that 't is Perversity of Will , and not Weakness of Understanding , which makes them disacknowledge it . They w●●●d ▪ live like Libertines and at large , or , as the ●…ure expresses it , like Sons of Belial , sine jugo ; ●… , placing all their Affections on the Pleasures or ●…ts of this Life , they are loath to think there 〈…〉 be any Future State , in which they should be 〈◊〉 to an account . The Goodness of Rational Nature which their Creatour had given them , could not but 〈…〉 and upbraid them that they had deprav'd that N●●●●e , and wrong'd the Best Order of the World by ●…centious Debaucheries . Wherefore , their Thoughts , ( ●● St. Paul says ) thus accusing themselves by the ●…inct of the Law writ in their hearts , they endea●●●●'d to stifle all those Truths which could put them 〈◊〉 an apprehension of a future reckoning ; and thence ●●ey willingly entertain'd the opinion , that there being 〈…〉 survivency of the Soul , Death would Seal an ●●●esty for all their Extravagancies , and cancel all ●… , Debts . And , for the same reason , they were ●●th to think there was a GOD who govern'd the ●●●ld ; lest , being Just , he should severely punish them 〈…〉 abusing the Nature he had given them , and for ●…olating the Universal Law of the World which he 〈…〉 establisht . But , leaving those poor Miscreants as Objects of 〈…〉 Pity , after we have charitably ●●de●vour'd , to our best Power , to ●…ctifie and convince their Reason ; et us , ( which most concerns us ) look home to our selves ; and take care that We ▪ to whom God has given the Knowledge ( or Belief ) that our Soul is Immo●●al , be not beaten with as many stripes as They ; if we neglect to guide our lives according to that Principle which we profess and acknowledge to be True ; the● which , if it be a Truth , 't is Self-evident , that nothing can more highly , or more nearly concern as ▪ The more Evident it is , the more indispensable obligation it lays upon us to follow it in our Practice and the more Inexcusable we shall be if we neglect that Duty . Our own Clear Reason has shown as , that our Soul , it being of a Spiritual Nature , or ● Pure Act , is Superiour , and , in the Heraldry ●● Being , of a far Nobler Extraction than is all t●● Great Heap of Rubbish , Matter ; and , therefore , i● of more Intrinsick worth than all this Visible Worl● Not an Operation of thine , not an Object that is ●● thy Knowing Power , but , if well reflected on , info●● us clearly of this Great and most Important Tr●● How Unreasonable then , and Unnatural would it ●● in us not to bestow our Chief , if not Only car● , ●● provide for the Eternal Welfare of our Soul , which ●● so Precious in it self ; and so neerly ally'd to Us , t●● 't is a Part , and by far the Best Part of this Thing ●● are , call'd Man : What will it profit a Man ( say●● who is the Eternal Wisdom ) to gain the Who●● World and lose his own Soul ? How Senseless ●● Foolish must we appear in the Sight of GOD and ●● Angels ●o prefer the Conveniencies of this Mome●tary Life , ( for all Time , could we live while it l●st is but a Moment to the Endless Duration of a Spir●● before the M●ans to live Eternally Happy in the O●●●● How Vile , to enslave our Affections here to Riches , ●●●●o●eal Pleasures , or Airy Honour , which are so in●●itely below us , being indeed nothing but Shining Clay , well figur'd and colour'd Earth , and Articulate Air ; which are , perhaps the Basest of all Material Beings ? What Generous heart , if not infatuated even to Madness , would so debase his Dignity as to subject himself , and all his dearest Concerns , to his Underling or Slave ; and such a Slave as will certainly ruin him by his over-kind Condescendency ? Knowledge and Virtue are the Only True , and the ●●●t Perfections of our Soul , while she is in the Way to her Last End : Whence we may be Certain they ●●● Agreeable to her Nature . The Increase in these gives her Growth and Strength ; and , consequently must advance her towards the Right End for which Nature ordain'd her : Whereas , what 's made of this corruptible Trash , Matter , must needs depress ●er High-born Nature , and disgrace her Extraction . ●●deed , those Material Creatures , may , by our Sober ●se of them , serve as Drudges , to assist our other Comp●rt , the Body , with necessary Conveniencies . They may also be a means to raise the Soul to the Knowledge of her self and her Great Maker ; but , ●f we affect them farther than as they are subservient to those Laudable Ends , we shall put the Order of the Creation out of it's Frame ; and ( Irrational Love , especially if Excessive , being a perfect Slavery ) we shall invert the Gradual Series of Beings of which the world consists , turn the Climax of Causes with the ●eels upwards , and make our Soul servilely truckle to those Despicable things which were made to do her Homage . Lest our Fancy not much assisting our Memory in things above us , we may forget what we lately demonstrated , of how surpassing an Excellency and how Refin'd a perfection of Being our Soul is , above this Dross of Matter , of which our Bodies are ●neaded ; let us review once more the Product of some of our most Attentive and Deliberate Thoughts . We have seen it clearly Demonstrated , that our Soul's Capacity , ( which is of Knowledge ) contrary to the Nature of Material Containers , is Infinite ; Whence she is so far from being fill'd by the accession of such Objects as this Material World can afford her ; that even now , while here , they serve but to enlarge her said Capacity ; that is , to encrease ●er Thirst of knowing still more : From which follows , that in her future State , when she is all Mind , and constantly , and most eagerly Attentive , and addicted to her only ▪ Natural Perfection , Knowledge ; she will , being then a Pure Act , and operating accordingly , strain her incredible Activity to attain the Sight of the First Cause of all things , and to know what he is in himself ; and thence must remain ever in a vehement Longing and Tormenting Dissatisfaction , unless she attain that only Soul-satiating Contemplation of Him who is Infinite Truth and the First Cause of all those Created Effects , the Knowledge of which transported her with such an Insatiable Desire of seeing him . We have seen , that as the Purest and most Refined Gold cannot incorporate with Dust , the Natures or Qualities of Corporeal Beings , when in thy Knowing Power , cannot mingle with thy Purer and Nobler Essence ; nor , ( as Proper and Connatural Affections do use ) alter it or bring it to their Nature ▪ But they stand aloof from it ; and , tho' they be in thee , yet they keep their Distance ; and , contrary to the Genius of Corporeal Modes , they are there ●s Objects , that is , as Other Things , or as Distinct from thee . We have shown , that by our Apprehending what [ Existence ] , or Actual Being , is , ( which 't is Evident we do , since we know the Meaning of those words ) thou hast the Nature of Existence in thy Knowledge , that is , in thy self ; which is impossible to be shadow'd or represented but only in a Spiritual Mirrour ; Nay , by having what 's meant by the word [ Existence , ] in thee , which Abstracts from all Limited or Particular Manners or Degrees of it , thou hast in thee the Nature of Existence in Common , or in it's whole Latitude , Unconfin'd to this or that Subject ; which demonstrates that thy Nature is Capable to comprehend the whole Creation ; and to see clearly even that Soveraign Being it self , whose Nature is Unconfin'd or Infinite Existence . We have seen by thy framing Respects of one thing to another , that thou hast in thee a Power of Ordering them ; and , consequently , the Nature of that Order it self ; whereas there is nothing in the Material World but so many Singulars ; each of which is ultimately Determin'd by it's Individuating Principles ; and , therefore , is Independent and Absolute in it self , without the least Reference or Actual Respect to one another . We have seen clearly demonstrated , that thy Ess●●ce is Superiour in the Line of Being to the whole ●●ture of Continu'd Quantity , tho' stretcht out to the vast Expansion of the Heavens , and even as far as the World's Surface ; and that thy Knowing Power is able to fathom it all , without straining it's Capacity beyond it's reach . We have seen also how it is capacious enough to contain the whole Nature of Discrete Quantity , tho' it fills all those Boundless Rooms in the Long Row of Number , algebraically repeated . All those short Items of particular Times and Places , summ'd up into one Total are compriz'd , and writ in short hand , in thy Indivisible Essence . The whole Progress of Motion and Time , and it 's Untraceable Antiquity from the First Winding up the Clock of Nature till it's Line is run out at the World's last Period , when the sick Tapour of dying Nature , and the Eye of the World , ( the Sun ) shall begin to wink , and become bloodshot , till 't is darken'd and Extinguisht ; All this Long Race of Time , I say , is far too short to be commensurated with thy Essence and Duration . The Former sort of Quantity is but as it were a Point , the later but an Instant , when resum'd after an Indivisible manner in thy Comprehensive Being . All the Permanent parts of the one are in Thee without the least Extension or Distance , and all the Succeeding Parts of the Other , whether Past or Future , when vested with thy manner of Being , amount but to one still-Present Now. Nor can this seem Incredible to any Christian ; since we all hold that Spiritual Natures are Capable of seeing GOD's Essence as in it self ; which ( as is Undeniable ) infinitely surmounts all the whole Machine of this Material World. We have seen that all Physical Qualities do enjoy , when in thee , another manner of Being ; and affect Thee , their Subject , after a quite different way from what they had when they were in Material Nature . The most Opposite ones , which are perpetually contrasting , and restlessly striving to expell one another ; do , by thy Soveraign Power , remain at peace in thy Steady Essence ; which is of 〈…〉 High a Dignity to be mov'd , or disturb'd , by their Petty Quarrels . We have seen that thy Abstracting . Power can ●…de these Lower Beings more Subtilly than can the Operation of Fire , or any Chymistry of Nature assisted by Art ; and can take in pieces their very Essences , and the Essences of their several Modes , by cutting them into their Metaphysical Parts ; which are too delicate for our Bodily Sight , tho' assisted with the best Microscopes , to discern or make Observations how they differ : Each of which Parts too ( tho' naturally Impartible ) have a Distinct Being given by Thee ; and can be wrought upon by thy Understanding , as if they were so many Wholes ; and this , with that most perfect Distinction , that they do not in the least interfere , in thee , tho' they ●●● All of them confusedly blended as they stand in Rude and Unpolisht Matter . We have seen , how , by the cement of Existence , exprest by the short Monosyllable [ is , ] thou dost ▪ i● thy Comparing Power , ( the Laboratory where Truths are fram'd ) re-connect those thus-divided Parts into Propositions ; and this , with an Union so Close , that 't is ▪ absolutely Indissoluble by the utmost Force of all the Causes in Nature . Nay , that thy Spiritual Essence can in some manner , Create , by giving a kind of Being in Thee , to Not-Beings or Nothings . In a word , we have seen , that all the whole Material World , and every Part of it that ever came to thy Knowledge , do enjoy a New sort of Being in Thee ; and such a one as is contradictorily Opposite to the Being they had in their Material State. All these high Prerogatives , dilating thy Essence and Duration to a kind of Infinity above this Narrow World , we have found clearly to be no more but thy Just Due ; however Unreflecting Atheists , whose groveling Souls , immerst in Matter , cannot , or will not , raise themselves above Fancy , do use their misemploy'd Foolish Wit , ( as the World calls it ) to devest themselves of their own Dignity , and , like so many worst Feloes de se , by maintaining their Soul is Mortal , do give themselves to be Guilty of Eternal Death ; or , ( which is worse than Death ) of Annihilation , by granting their Souls incapable of Surviving . But let us , to whom the Providence of our Good Make● has indulg'd these Clear Informations , make o●● Right Use of them . Since these are Great Truths ▪ let Truth have it's Due Effects . 'T is so Gross at Errour , that it is below Confute , to imagine , that any Truth is an Idle and Fruitless Speculati●● ▪ The Knowledge of Truth in Particular things , does ▪ of it's own Nature , tend to direct our Outward Actions ; and Universal Truths ( such as these are ) do naturally conduce to enlarge our Soul , raise ●● to High Contemplation , and to breed in us Conformable Affections . Since then we have the best ●…rance Clear Demonstration can give us , that this Material World is below our Essence , 't is most fit we should esteem it to be also below our most Serious Thoughts and our Best Affections . Let us ●●ancipate our selves then from the Slavish Adoration , with which Worldlings devote themselves to that Dull and Senseless Idol . And , seeing Evident Reason has perfectly convinced us there is no shadow of Likelihood that our Soul is Mortal ; let us bend all ●●● carefullest Endeavours to provide she may be Happy in her Eternal State , when she comes to be ●●●●●dg'd from her terrene habitation , and has got clear of her Body , and this World , nay , is got above it ; which is the only True Wisdom . To the Consideration of which State of hers we advance in our next Discourse . Transnatural Philosophy : OR , METAPHYSICKS . BOOK II. Of PURE ACTS . VIZ. Of the SOUL SEPARATED , and ANGELS . CHAP. I. Of the State of the Soul Separated from the Body ; and , what Dispositions in her when the Man Dies , will make her Eternally Happy or Miserable . 1. THE Soul does , at her Separation , receive from GOD , as he is the Author of Nature , some Change , according to her Existence , and her Subsistence or Suppositality . For , since in her former State of Union with her Body , she was the Form of that Body , and therefore ( Form and Matter being the Parts of every Compound Ens ) only a Part of Man ▪ and a Part of an Ens is not an Ens or Individuum ; nor ▪ consequently , capable of Existing ; much less of Subsisting , which ( as is shown above , B. 1. Chap. 5. § . 17. ) superadds some Perfection to the Notion of Existence : It follows , that , seeing the same Soul , when separated from the Body , ( she being ( by Book 1. Chap. 7. ) Immortal ) does Exist , and also Subsist , in regard she Sustains her own Nature ; and , as will be prov'd shortly , her Modes too ; she must be made apt to Exist and Subsist , which she was not while in her former State ; that is , she must be Chang'd according to those Considerations or Respects ; and made an Existent and Subsistent Thing , and consequently a Kind of Suppositum . And that it belongs to GOD , as he is the First Cause , to give the Soul this highest Perfection of Being , is hence demonstrated . For it belongs to an Infinite Actuality , or an Infinite Goodness , to give to his Creatures all the Goodness and Natural Perfections they are capable to receive ; especially such as the very Nature he has given them makes them require : Now 't is evident , that the Nature of the Soul ( she being Immortal ) is capable of , and requires still to Exist ; and also to Subsist and be a Suppositum ; because she had , while in the Body , Power to have in her , as in their Subject , ( that is , to Sustain or be the Suppositum of ) innumerable Accidents , Notions or Knowledges , which , they being Spiritual or Indivisible , could not be received in a Divisible Subject , the Corporeal part of Man ; and , therefore , could only be peculiarly in Her. Whence it follows that , since 〈◊〉 Ordain'd the Dissolution of the Man , or the 〈◊〉 Separation from the Body , and had also m●de the Soul Immortal , it became His Goodness to give her , when separated , Existence , which her Immortal Nature requir'd ; and also the Power of Subsisting , and of being the Subject , or Suppositum of those Accidents . ● ▪ How this is done we may learn by this Pa●…el . A Quantitative Thing , v. g. Stone , has many Potential Parts in it ; some of one Colour or Figure , some of another : Now , none of those Parts , taken singly , can Exist or ●ub●●st while they were Parts , but only the whole Thing call'd a Stone ; for only that was a Distinct Individual Thing , which only is capable of Existing . But , because this whole Thing had a Power to be Divided ( or had Potential Parts in it ) , ●●● so was apt to be made more Actual Wholes , or , 〈…〉 ings : hence each Part , when thus Divided , ●…ade a Distinct whole Ens , has immediately its ●●●●icular Existence given it by GOD. And , be●…se some of those Parts , while in the Whole , 〈◊〉 some different Modifications in it , which another Part had not ; whence it was independent on any other Part , as to the sustaining such Accidents ; and , consequently it has a Power to ●●●●ain them , when it should come to be made a Whole ; therefore it has given it to Subsist independently on the former Whole , or any other Part of it ; and to be a Suppositum to sustain those Accidents . Much more are those Perfections of Being ●●turally due to the Soul , which is of an Immortal Nature . 3. Notwitstanding , each Soul , when separated continues the same Individual Soul which it was in the Body ▪ First , Because in the Body she was the chief Essential Part of the Man : And Essence abstract , from Existence , and , consequently from Subsistence and Suppositality ▪ So that her being chang'd according to Suppositality , or in some manner according to Existence , does not alter her particular Essence or Nature . Secondly , She had her Individuality from the Individual Dispositions in the Embryo , which determine the Matter so as to require that such an individual Form ( or Soul ) and no other , should be infus'd ▪ Thirdly , She had her Determinate or Individual Pitch of Spirituality or Cognoscitiveness , given her at the Instant in which she was first infus'd ▪ nor could it be taken away by the succeeding Accidents of Knowledge afterwards ; both because they superven'd to her Individual Nature or Degree of Cognoscitiveness ; as also because they were not contrary , but agreeable to such a Nature . Again , were this true Reason wav'd , yet , since in this Mortal State the Soul gains Notions or Knowledge , by means of her Senses , from every Circumstance the Man is in ; and 't is impossible any two Men , should be all their Lives in the self-same Circumstances ; 't is impossible ( abati●● their Constitutions individually different ) that my Soul should have the self-same Complexion of Spiritual Modes of Knowledge , and consequent Affections , in this World , which another Soul has ; which sufficiently distinguishes her from every other Particular Soul , or ( which is the same ) Individuat● her as she is a Soul. Wherefore this Change of the Soul , at her ●…ration , amounts to no more but to take from 〈◊〉 the Imperfection of being a Part , and to ●…fer upon her the Priviledge of a Whole Ens ; which is given to every new Individuum in Nature that is made such by Division or meer Separation . 4. Nothing which was once in the Soul in this ●…e , ( excepting False Judge●…nts ) is blotted out of her in 〈◊〉 State of Separation . For , 〈◊〉 whatever is naturally ex●…d out of any Subject is driven ●●●ce by ▪ it's Contrary ; and Con●●●es ( by Ch. 7. § . 15. ) do not ●…l one another out of the ●…d , but fix one another better there ; 't is evi●●nt that from this Head , or from the Objects which are in the Soul , nothing whatever that 〈◊〉 once in the Soul is Effaced out of her , but ●…ains there for ever . Again , since the pecu●… Nature of the Soul is not Material or Divisi●… ; but , when she is separated , she is a Pure Act ; ●…re can be no Ground , from the Subject's side , ●●at Notions or Knowledges should be worn out , 〈◊〉 decay by reason of the Alterableness or Fading Genius of the Subject , or her Incapacity to retain ●…m still : Whatever Knowledge therefore was 〈◊〉 in the Soul will be ever there . And the ●…son why in this State they come not into ●●●y , when we would use them , but seem forgotten , is , because the Phantasms , ( without which the Soul cannot operate , ) being the smallest particles of Matter , are either perisht , or else lost in a wilderness of innumerable others , so that they are not still ready at hand to re-excite our Knowledge of them , or make us remember them . 5. Every Separated Soul which had any one Notion in her while here , does know all Created Truths as soon as she is out of the Body . For , since * , as has been demonstrated , the knowing of a Great Number of Finite Truths do not , to any Degree , tend to fill the Capacity of the Soul , but enlarge and enable it to know still much more ; there can be no difficulty , on the Subjects side , why she should not know all Created Truths , they being Finite both in their Nature and in their Number . On the other side , since our Notions are the Ground of Truth ; and All Truths , tho' they be never so many , are connected ; and this by the Identifying particle [ is , ] which shows they are after some manner i● one another : Nay , ( which alone suffices ) since it has been fully demonstrated , ( Method to Science , Book 3. Ch. 4. § . 14. beginning at § . 8. ) That Every Soul Separate that knows any one Natural Truth , does know all Nature at once in the First Instant of her Separation ; it is evinced , that there can be as little difficulty on the part of the Objects to be known as there was on the Subjects side . Whence follows , that every Soul Separated which had here any one Notion in her , especially ( as she must ) of her own , or the Man's Existence , does know all Truths as soon as she is out of the Body . 6. To satisfie those , who , led by Fancy , and customary Impressions from Material Objects , do make them the Rule and Measure to judge of Spiritual Natures ; and thence are very backward to assent to a Truth which seems so Paradoxical and Impossible ; I take leave to recommend to their serious consideration a far stranger Point , which yet all Christians hold , viz. That a Holy Soul , when separate , is capable of seeing clearly the Divine Essence it self ; in comparison of which , all Created Beings are but a s●if●e , or rather a meer Nothing . 7. Hence follows , That every Separated Soul comprehends all Time and Place . ●●r , since those innumerable Natural Objects , which ●he then knows , are in Distinct Times and Places ; nay , are the very Things whose Extension and Succession do make all Place and Time ; it is Impossible but that , having those Things in her Knowledge , she must comprehend those Times and Places , which are Modes of those Things ; and , consequently , Parts of the Entire Notion of those Things themselves ; that is , she must comprehend all Time or Place . 8. Corollary I. Hence is demonstrated how great an Errour it is , and against the Nature of a Pure Act ; to put the Duration of Pure Spirits to be in some sort Successive ; and that their Operations , and consequently their Existence , are measureable by the Differences of Time , [ Before and After , ] whereas they comprehend all Time , and are of such a Nature as far transcends it , 9. Therefore such a Soul cannot but naturally have an Ardent Longing to know the Nature of the First Cause that made and order'd those Things . For , since 't is Essential to the Soul to be Cognoscitive ; and , consequently , the whole Bent ( and only Good ) of her Nature , in that State , is to have all the Knowledge she can , and must wish ; and the Knowledge of the Effects does naturally , and also vehemently excite and enflame those who are wholly addicted to Knowledge , ( as the Soul naturally is in that State ) to know the Cause which Created them of Nothing , and rang'd them in that most beautiful Order : Nay , since they do not know those things as they ought , without knowing them a priori in their First Cause ; and how , and by what virtue , he Created them . Again , since ( as was often prov'd ) the Knowledge of all Created Truths , they being Finite , cannot in the least fill or satisfie the Natural Desire of the Soul ; and therefore only the Knowledge of an Infinite Truth can satiate and content her ; and she cannot but vehemently long to enjoy that , which only can satisfie a Propension so ●adicated in her Nature : It follows from all these heads , that the Knowledge of all Created Truths do serve only to increase her Thirst , and to enflame her Desire more ardently and impatiently , to know the Nature or Essence of that Infinite and Glorious Source of all Being , the First Cause ; from which issued all those admirable Effects , and which she now sees is the Object only worthy of her Knowledge : Whence she must look upon her self as utterly lost and un●one , and remain eternally miserable if she falls short of that only Soul-satisfying Sight . 10. From the § . § . 4 , and 5. it follows necessarily , that a Soul , when Separated , is naturally , while Separated , Unchangeable . For , ( besides other Reasons ) the Notion of Created Ens is adequately Divided by Indivisible and Divisible , as by its Differences , which are Contradictories ; Nor is there any thing in the Species but the Notion of the Genus ( in which they agree ) and the Notion of the Difference by which they disagree , and this ( in our case ) contradictorily : Hence it follows , that whatever is Affirm'd of One of the Species besides the Generical Notion , the Contradictory to it must be Affirm'd of the Other Species ; wherefore , as truly and certainly as we can affirm of One of the Species , Body , that it is Quantitative , Divisible , has Part after Part , and that its Operations are perform'd Successively one after another , &c. so truly can we affirm of the Other Species , Spirit , that it is Unquantitative , Indivisible , has not Part after Part , and is not Successive in its Operations ; in regard none of these relate to the Genus . But what has no Successiveness in it , cannot be otherwise than it was before , or Chang'd ; Therefore the Soul , while it is a pure Spirit , is naturally Unchangeable . 11. From the same § . 5. 't is demonstrated , without needing any farther Proof , that the Soul , when Separated , knows , and cannot but know all the Words , Actions , Thoughts and Affections of her whole fore-past Life , finding those Later in her Self ; she her Self being then her own First , Immediate , and Ever-present Object ; and the Former in the Course of Causes , and in the Circumstances there mention'd . Also that she cannot but know the Natural Actions , Thoughts , &c. of others , since these also were Effects , and had their Causes ; and so were knowable by her as well as the others . Lastly , That she must a fortiori know what Good or Bad Dispositions were in her self when she Dy'd , they being now Modes or Accidents of her self ; nor is it possible that a Creature that has Knowledge and Will in it , should not ( even in this dull State ) know what it self chiefly wishes and desires . 12. Corollary 1. Hence is understood how the Particular Iudgment , determining the Soul's Future Condition , is made at the Hour of Death ; and how she comes to Hope or Despair of Eternal Hap piness , according as she sees her self Fit or Unfit for it ; whence she becomes Determin'd to her Final Lot : which Fitness or Unfitness is , in the Old Language of the Christian Church , call'd , Merit or Demerit ; which are the same as Disposition or Indisposition for Bliss ; only differing in an Extrinsecal Denomination , taken from GOD's having Promis'd and Threaten'd the Happy or Unhappy Consequences of Good or Bad Actions . 13. Corollary II. Hence also is understood how the Book of Conscience will be laid open at the last Day ; when GOD shall reveal abscondita tenebrarum , or ( as the Sybill expresses it ) Cunctaq , cunctorum cunctis arcana patebunt ; and this after a more Clear and Solemn Manner than meer Nature could have perform'd . 14 ▪ Corallary III. Hence also we may see why , and how , Infants are connaturally sav'd by Baptism , as by the most General and Genuine Means . For , they carry no Dispositions out of the Body , but Affections to the Mother's Dug , to lie soft and warm , and such like ; which being meerly Natural , or rather Animal , were too weak and too base to put any thing in them , which might raise them in their Future State towards Heaven . But , when they come into the Region of Light , and know all things ; amongst the rest , that they were Baptiz'd in Christ's Name , and that that External Action , ( the Impressions , and consequently the Notions of which remain yet in their Soul ) was particularly done upon them , and was Ordain'd as a Supernatural Means by Him , acting as a Supernatural Agent , for their Salvation , or to addict them to Him , and make them His ; immediately , that Sacrament , ( as others also do ) working its Effect ex vi Institutionis Christi , gives them other Thoughts , and Higher Aims than meer Nature could have done ; makes them conceive Actual Hope and Love of their Good GOD and Saviour ; and so disposes or fits them , at the same Instant , for Heaven . 15. Corollary IV. Hence we may discover how Unnatural , as well as Impious a Heresy Ana-Baptism is ; in debarring their Infants from the most Certain Means , in the Course of GOD's Supernatural Providence , to bring them to Heaven , in case they Die before they come to use their deliberate Reason in chusing their Last End. But I am here only to lay Certain and Evident Grounds to Confute Errors , and not to Pursue them . 16. Corollary V. Lastly , hence is seen how far more easie it is for the Saints and Angels in Heaven , to hear our Petitions , either put up to our common Lord , or desiring the Assistance of their Prayen ● as also to know our Necessities our Amendment , the Repe●tance of a Sinner , for which as our Saviour says , they have a particul●… Ioy ; tho' such happy Spirits know th●… Things after a far Clearer and Nobler Manner than Natural Knowers do ; viz. not i● ignoble Effects , but in the best Manner à Pr●ori , or in the First Cause ; by seeing his D●vine Essence , in whom we do all Live , M●… and have our Being . 17. The Practical Iudgment , or Affection of the Soul , ( as Experience teaches ) does more sway the Operations of it , and carry it towards the Attainment of what it wishes , than the Greatest Speculative Knowledge of any Good whatever . For , since we have two Operative Faculties of the Soul , Understanding and Will , and the Understanding , as contradistinguisht from the Will , has for it's Proper Act or Effect , only a Speculative Knowledge or Iudgment of the Truth of the Thing , abstracting from this consideration , whether it be our Good or no ; and goes no farther ; but when our Consideration , by a Close and frequent Converse with the Object , and a more thorow-Penetration of it's Agreeableness , or how Good it is to us , lays this Agreeableness to ●…art , and Conceits it to be our Interest to have ●… ▪ there are immediately produced in us Affections , or ( which is the same ) Practical Iudgments , ●…pelling us to Act for it or pursue it , which are ●…cts of the Will : Hence , 't is only these Practical Judgments , and not Speculative ones , which move us to the pursuit and Attainment of any ●…ood ; whether that Object be our True Good , 〈…〉 no. 18. Intellectual Goods , tho' Infinite , or the seeing Him who is Infinite Truth , are immediately attain'd by the Soul , when Separated , if she be dispos'd with a Perfect Affection or Love for it . For , since the Soul is of an Intellectual Nature , and such that she is not Capable to be satiated or fill'd with Finite Truths , how Great or Many soever they be ; and , therefore , she is , by her Nature , ordain'd to see an Infinit Truth ; nor can her Speculative Knowledge of all Created Truths , breed any Hindrance ; but by giving her more Light of the Excellency of that Divine Object , is rather ( if no sinister Affection detain her ) ordain'd to beget in her a high Affection for it ; nor , in the Case here put , does any sinister Practical Judgment , or any such Affection detain her from it , in regard it is here suppos'd that she has an Affection for it ; so that not only the whole Bent of her unperverted Nature , but also the whole Propension of her Voluntary Affections , gain'd here by frequent and most Deliberate Acts , have addicted her to know or see that Blissful Object : Wherefore , all imaginable Dispositions being put on her part , to see this Infinit Truth , it will be seen and known by the Soul in case it be of its own nature Intelligible , which 't is most evident it is . For , since all Unintelligibleness , or Obscurity of any Object springs from the Confusedness and Indetermination found in it , which arises from the Power or Matter ; and all Distinctness , and by consequence , greater Intelligibility , from the Act ; and GOD , or Infinit Truth , is an Infinitely Pure and most simple Actuality ; or Purus Candor Aeternae Lucis , and therefore of his own Nature infinitely Intelligible ; and consequently , will be actually known , so there be no Indisposition , Blemish or Impurity in the Spiritual Eye of the Understanding which is to know it ; or , ( which is the same ) some Inordinate Affection for some Created or False Good makin● it addict its squinting Eye towards It. It follow● hence that , since Extrinsecal Application has no place here , or rather this Perfect Affection being the very , and only , Application of one Spirit to another ; all imaginable Causes are put for such an Effect , or , for such a Soul 's seeing God ; and consequently the Effect it self , or the Beatifical Vision must follow . 19. Coroll . VII . Hence the whole Employ of our Lives here ought to be this , viz. to take care we do not set our Affections inordinately on Temporal or False Goods ; which ( being Fleeting ) do perish , and leave us Empty in our Future never-dying State ; but wisely to wean our selves from affecting them excessively ; and withal to gain Predominant Practical Judgments or Affections for Eternal Goods , which will never leave us ; and , withall , will fill and satisfy our Boundless Wishes in the other World ; or , which is the same , make us Eternally Happy . 20. Cor. VIII . Hence is shown that only Love of God above all things can dispose us for Heaven , or ( which is the same ) make us held worthy , or deserve such an Infinit Reward ; which is Promist us by God's Goodness , upon our putting that good Disposition . 21. Coroll . IX . Hence all the Law and the Prophets , all the whole Body of Christian Doctrin , all Christ's Instructive Words , Exemplary Actions and Affective Sufferings ; all Church-Government , Sacraments , Teaching , Preaching , Mortification , Reading Holy Books , perusing the Lives of the B. Saints and Martyrs ; nay , all our Keeping Festivals , and all Ceremonious Actions of what kind soever , ( if righ●ly understood and made use of ) are of no worth or Efficacy towards our Salvation , farther than they may ●end Immediately or Remotely to breed and advance in Souls this Ultimate and Effectual Disposition to Bliss , Perfect Charity , or the Love of GOD above all things ; whence will follow of course , the Love of our Neighbour as our selves ; and Eternal Happiness , as the Reward of both . 22. Corollary X. Hence , RELIGION is the Art of breeding up Souls in such a manner as may dispose them for Eternal Happiness . This is evident , Because all the Maxims , Means , Motives , and Methods of True Religion do , either immediately or remotely , tend to that End. 23. On the contrary , and for the same Reason , those Unhappy Souls , which , at their Separation , have their First Affection placed on some False or Temporary Good , ( v. g. on Aiery Honour , Ambitious Greatness , Corporeal Pleasure , or Sordid Riches ) will , as soon as they are out of the Body , be in a State of Intolerable Grief and most Horrid Torment . For , as is already prov'd , § . 20. they can never obtain their True Last End , ( to which Nature does now give them most Violent Propensions ) because they want the Disposition Proper for it ; or rather , by not loving it as they ought , but having Chosen another False End in stead of it , and Loving that above all things , that is above It , they are utterly Indispos'd for it ; which Disposes or Entitles them to that Eternal Pain call'd Poena Damni , or Damnation , which is the loss of ever seeing GOD. Nor yet can they get or enjoy those Temporary or False Goods , which they did here , and must now unchangeably , ( or for ever ) chiefly , if not only dote upon : the Loss of which affects them with that Tormenting Grief , call'd Poena Sensûs , or the Pain which arises from the want of an ill-chosen Temporary Last End. So that they have lost , and are left destitute of all they can possibly wish ; they have their Wills crost in every thing , and this for all Eternity ; which fills their whole Soul with most Unspeakable and Unconceiveable Anguish . 24. The State of Separation Elevates the Soul to an Incomparable , and , in a manner , an Infinite Perfection of Existence above that which she had in the Body . For , as was prov'd lately , she is now a Pure Act , knows all Created things , comprehends Time and Place , perfectly sees all her former Thoughts and Actions , and this all at once : Nay , when Separated , she is Capable ( if due Dispositions be put ) to see the Divine Essence , which none can see and live . 25. Therefore all her Modes or Accidents , and particularly the Affections she had here , are elevated in a vast proportion , as far as the State of Separation can heighten them ; that is , to an Unconceiveable degree of Intenseness . For , her Modes are only her Knowledges and her Affections ; how vastly her Knowledge is increast and extended , is already prov'd ; and her Affections , which spring from her Knowledge , and are proportion'd to them , must necessarily be increast accordingly ; and this out of the force and nature of her Separated State. So that , put case the Affections she had here for a Temporary Good , was ( as we say ) ad unum , and the Love she had for her Eternal Good was ad centum ; and that the State of Separation rais'd that Affection ut mille , ( which , as appears by these Grounds , is but a weak expression ) it would follow , that the Soul , when Separated , would be found loving her Eternal Good a hundred thousand times more than she lov'd that Temporary one ; which would make her fly with a most ravishing Transport to be united with her Chief Good , if that Temporary Affection does not indispose her . 26. Wherefore , those Wretched Souls which part from the Body with Love of Created and Temporal Goods above the Increated , Infinite , and Eternal one ; especially those , who , by Supernatural Light had a higher Knowledge of GOD than Nature could have given them ; must necessarily , by means of the Elevation of their Affections in their Separate State , have their Torments increast to a Hell of Misery . For , since the State of Separation exalts the Soul , and , consequently , the Knowledges and Affections she had in the Body , to an incompatable pitch above what they were here ; and Every Thing operates as it is : It follows , That the Pain and Sorrow they have for the Loss ▪ of what they thus Affected , and on which they had set their whole hearts ; must in a manner infinitely exceed any Sorrow they could possibly have had in this life . Besides , they have this Surcharge of Torture , that their Contrary , and ever Unre●●actable and Irreconcileable Judgments tear the Soul in pieces , ( as it were ) within her self ; and make her become her own Torment . The Natural Love of her True ▪ Last End , ( and much ●ore if it were formerly known also Supernaturally ) carries her with a Violent Bent towards that which , he sees now is her only-True Happiness ; and , at the same time , the far stronger Torrent of her Affections , for that False Last End , which she had here , with a full Deliberation and long-frequented Practice , made Choice of and pursu'd for her Summum Bonum , hurries her with a Madness of Transport , and an impetuosity equal to the inconceiveable activity she is now endow'd with , to enjoy them ; tho' at the same time she sees them impossible to be had , and withall most Base , Vile , and below her Nature , if they were had ; and yet as Base as they are , she must , as her condition now is , ever affectionately hug the Thoughts and Wish of them ; tho' she sees this Affection for them is her Torment , and the true Cause of all her Endless Misery . Add , that they have , and must have , these racking Convulsions of their Mind all at once ; without hopes of the least Intermission for all Eternity . Lastly , Those Souls comprehending now all Time and Place , their Affections work accordingly ; So that ▪ whereas in this Life they confin'd their Wishes to enjoy those False Goods in some one time or place , or some one Circumstance ; they now long vehemently to enjoy All of them which are sutable to such an Affection , in every part of Time and every particular ▪ Place ; nay , they wish to subordinate all the whole Creation to attain that False Last End , which they had unfortunately chosen , and must now for ever dote upon . Which being impossible , as the Course of Causes now stand , it follows , that every Creature in the world crosses them and is their Torment ; according to that saying , Pugnabit orbis terrarum contra insensatos . So that their whole never-ending Life ( if it may be call'd so ) is wholly made up of Distracting Madness , Furious Rage , Self-racking Contrary Wishes , tearing their own Bowels ; Heart-gnawing Regret ; Shameful Confusion ; Fruitless Repentance ; Black Desperation ; Cursings of themselves and all Creatures ; Blasphemings of the Holy Saints , and of their Dread Creatour and Just Judge , GOD , Blessed for evermore . Or , as our B. Saviour , in accommodation to our greatest Griefs here , moderately expresses it , Weeping and Wailing and Gnashing of Teeth . The Gnawing Worm of Helpless Remorse ●ever dies there ; nor is the Vehement Fire of these Violent and Contrary Affections ever quenched . Quis poterit habitare cum igne devorante — Quis habitabit cum ardoribus sempiternis ! Isaiae , Cap. 33. 14. 27. Hence is seen , That GOD damns no Man. For , since ( by § . 23. ) Inordinate Affection for Creatures addicts the Soul to a wrong Last End ; and , at the same time , by doing so , does In●●pose her for her True Happiness , the Sight of GOD , which she cannot , when Separated , but Naturally desire and long for ; and these Inordinate Affections , if Unretracted here , do still remain in the Soul , ( by § . 4. ) and , when Separated , she is Unchangeable in that State ; and , consequently sees she must for ever Despair of ●●taining her True Good , she being Impure and In●ispos'd for it ; and also of ever getting that False Good , upon which she had here set her Chief Affection ; because it is impossible , according to the Circumstances of things , in the other Life ; and that hence she becomes incapacitated of having any kind of Good she can desire , but has her Desire and Wish crost in every thing ; And the perpetual crossing her Voluntary and Natural Wishes in every thing , especially in what 's of Infinite Concern to her , must naturally cause in such a Soul Extreme Grief , Torment and Desperation : And this Tormenting Grief is enhanced by the Intenseness and Vehemency of her Acts , when she is a Pure Spirit ; with which the greatest and most violent Grief in this life bears no proportion . Lastly , since it has been clearly shown , that all these dismal Effects , which induce and make up that wretched State we call Damnation , do ( as is here shown ) spring originally , as from their Sole Cause from her having , by her own Free Choice , pitch● her First Affections upon some Created or False Good ; and all the other bad Consequences do follow out of the very Nature of a Spirit , thus Affected or Indispos'd : It is manifest , That GOD Damns no Man ; but that while a Sinner hugs and cherishes Inordinate Affections for Creatures in his Breast , he is all the while connaturally kindling , and adding Fuel to Hell-Fire in his own Soul ; to which effect of Damnation GOD contributes no otherwise than by preserving the Natures of things , and carrying on the Course of Causes according to those Natures ; which Wisest Method he has no reason to alter miraculously for their sakes who have preferr'd a Creature before Him. 28. It may be objected , that these Affections for Creatures were Passions , which either Spring from the Body , or from the Circumstances of the former World ; and , therefore , they do not remain , in a State where neither of them have any Influence upon the Soul. I Answer , First , That these are not Passions in our future State , as that word imports Motion ; but they are far worse , viz. the Termini or Effects of the most steadily fixt and worst Passion ; which we call Resolvedness in ill , or Willfulness : And this can , and must remain in a Soul determin'd to a wrong Last End ; she having , tho' no Motion of the Spirits , or Passion , a Power in her call'd a Will , of it 's own Nature indeed , determinable to Good and Bad , but by her State of Separation fixt unchangeably in that Determination which she dy'd with . Secondly , Tho' those Passions did indeed spring here from our Material Compart , the Body ; yet they did not stay in that Part , but affected , by means of material Impressions , the Soul ; and were ●●t in her by a deliberate and serious pitching her Chief Affections on them ; nay , perhaps rivetted there by long-continu'd Habits ; and therefore they must still remain in her for ever , unless they had been Retracted while she was in a Changeable condition in this Life . 29. Corollary XI . Hence , one Actual Sin of a high Nature , and done with perfect Deliberation , of which the Man dies Unrepentant , will make the Soul miscarry eternally ; such as are Self-Murther , being kill'd in a Duel for a Puntilio , and such like . 30. It may be said , that the Knowledge of all Truths will rectifie and alter the Soul as soon as she is separated , in regard that she sees then clearly the Vileness and Perniciousness of placing her Affection on a wrong Last End. 'T is Answer'd : First , That the Soul , as soon as Separated , knows all Truths only Speculatively ; but that the Practical Judgments or Affections which had prepossest her , ( as has been prov'd , § . 17. ) do more sway with her than all her Speculative Knowledge ; which her Choice did not give her , but Nature forced into her . Secondly , There could be no Cause which was Competent to alter her : Not her Separation ; For the whole Effect of that Action is to Divide the Potential Parts of a Compound ; that is , to take from them the State of Potentiality , and make them ( if they can exist separate ) Actual Wholes ; Actual Parts , as it has been demonstrated , being Impossible . Wherefore Death , being only the Separation of the Soul and Body , terminates it's Agency in making them Two of One , and has no Influence upon changing them . Nor does their State of Separation , or their remaining or becoming Separate , alter their Natures or their Modes ; for this consists in the Soul 's existing now A Pure Act ; which has nothing to do with taking away what she had ; but only , taking her as it found her , to elevate her , such as she was , and , consequently , those Knowledges and Affections she actually had , to a higher Perfection in the Line of Ens , or to give her to exist after a Nobler manner than she did formerly . Lastly , Were this so , the Order of the World would be quite perverted ; for , in that case , the Wickedest Livers would have equal Priviledge and Benefit in the next world , as the greatest Saints ; since , each of them , ( as is presuppos'd to our question ) knowing all things as soon as Separated , their Wickedness would be corrected , and effaced ; which takes away all the dread of Hell , evacuates all the Motives to good Life , and even destroys the Notion of Virtue and Vice , Punishment and Reward ; and , consequently , GOD's Attribute of Justice . 31. Corollary XII . Hence is seen , that Sin does not consist meerly in the Falshood of our Speculative Judgments , but in the Disproportion of our Practical Judgments or Affections for a Temporary Good , above the Degree of Affection it has for Eternal Goods . For , it may be a Truth , that the Objects of Sin were Agreeable to the Man in this Mortal State , especially taking him as thus circumstanced , which made him apply his Thoughts only to them ; and by that means he came to conceit strongly the Good he found in them ; and so by oft-repeated Acts he came to beget in his Soul ( Unattentive and Unapply'd to other Goods which were incomparably Greater ) vast Practical Iudgments , impelling him to act for them , and pursue them ; or , which is the same , by a long Converse with them , he got a strong Addiction to them , and most ardent Affection for them : But the reason why he came to fall into such Pernicious Sin , was because he did not to the same degree apply his Thoughts to Eternal Goods , nor so carefully and studiously consider the incomparable Excellency of them , as he did the Trifling Good of the others . Which had he done , ( as he ought ) it would have bred in him such solidly-grounded and strong Iudgments and Affections for Heaven , that it would have corrected ( either wholly or to a high degree ) the Affections to Creatures . The Falshood then which may have accompany'd the Practical Judgments of a Sinful Soul , will be corrected in the State of Separation ; because she knows then all Created Truths ; and Truth and Falshood , ( they being Contradictions , and therefore opposite to the Notion of Being , the only Object of our Understanding ) cannot consist together in an Intellectual Substance ; but the Predominancy or over-proportion of the Practical Judgment or Affection to Creatures ; ( whether it proceed from Falshood , or , as it does generally , and perhaps always from a more frequent and more hearty Application of the Soul to Creatures , ) does , and must , ever remain in her ; and withall the consequent Sad Effects mention'd , in case the Man dies with those Bad prevalent Judgments Unretracted . 32. Hence all those Knowledges , whether Physical , Moral , Mathematical , Metaphysical , Theological , or of what kind soever they be , in which the Man had particularly cultivated his Soul here , will , in the State of Separation , be Elevated to a very Deep , or Proportionable Penetration of the Objects of those Sciences in the State of Separation ; whence a peculiar Accidental Satisfaction is , by the Design of Nature , apt to accrue to every such well-employ'd Soul whatever . But , with this Distinction that those Souls which are Good , besides what Natural Means gives them , will have a particular Content or Accidental Joy in seeing the Supreme Reasons for the Truth of those respective Sciences in the First Cause ; Whereas in the Wicked they only serve to ex●… a more vehement Thirst of seeing the Highest Grounds of their Truth in the First Truth it self , ●●● Original Author of all Being ; which avails ●●●m nothing but to increase their Grief and Torment . 33. From the same Principles , 't is clearly deduced , that all the Virtuous and 〈…〉 Affections which Good ●●●●● had for Friends , Relations ●●● Acquaintances in this world , 〈◊〉 remain in them after Death ; ●●● that too , in a higher mea●●●● and affect them more heart●● than they did here . Whence ●●ey cordially wish and pray for 〈…〉 Progress in the way to True ●●●piness . They are Glad when 〈…〉 do well ; are Sorry , ( if their 〈◊〉 would permit it ) when we Sin ; at least , have ●…cidental Joy than they would have had , if 〈…〉 liv'd virtuously . Which Propension , 〈…〉 Natural or Acquir'd here , is exceeding●● enhanced by true Charity ; in which Best of ●…ues they do now abound more than we are 〈◊〉 to conceive . They take it kindly that we 〈◊〉 for the Consummation of their Bliss , and ●●● the Coming of Christ's Kingdom , when the New Hierusalem , the Church Militant and Triumphant , joyn'd in one Body , shall , without the least spot or wrinkle of Vice or Imperfection , and Adorn'd with the Lustrous Gems of the Purest Virtues , descend from Heaven like a Bride to meet her Spouse and Saviour . They require our Devout Wishes with their Powerful Prayers . Particularly , they rejoyce at any Good of ours to which themselves have been Instrumental . The same Joy have all those B. Saints , Apostles , Martyrs , Confessors , Virgins , and with them the Holy Angels also , when we keep their Festivals , to the end that we may Honour their Virtues , follow their Instructions , imitate their Holy Lives , obsequiously comply with their good Inspirations , Repent our Sins , and improve in Virtue . The same do those Good Souls , departed in an Inferiour ●●gree of Grace , who ( as most hold ) need our Prayers and Oblations . They are glad , and have Ease and Refreshment , by knowing that we have not forgot them , ( as Worldlings do , who love for petty ends ) but that we dutifully and charitably remember to pray for their Deliverance and Final Happiness . By which Doctrine we see how that Article of our Creed , the Communion of Saints is explicated , maintain'd and shown agreeable to Reason by Metaphysical Principles . Nay , even the Damned in Hell retain a Natural Affec●●●● for their surviving Friends and Relations ; as appears by Dives his Request to Abraham , that he would send to warn his Brethren to beware ●● coming into his place of Torment . 34. It may be thought that all these Particu●●rs are said gratis , because , to avoid Prolixity , I have not apply'd each of them to it 's Proper ●inciples . But if it shall please any ●●ponent to challenge me with ●●y Flaw in this Discourse , or ●●etend to show , that they are ●●t well-grounded , I shall not ●●ubt but to demonstrate them from the Prin●●●les already fore-laid and fore-prov'd , viz. That our Soul is Immortal ; That , when out of the ●ody she is a Pure Act , and of a Superiour nature 〈◊〉 Body : That in that State she knows all Natural 〈◊〉 , and is Unchangeable : That she remains 〈…〉 the same Affections which she had in her 〈…〉 were unretracted when the Man died ; 〈…〉 that they are most exceedingly heighten'd 〈…〉 State of Separation : Lastly , That those ●…violent Affections , and Unretractable in that 〈…〉 have conformable Effects issuing from them 〈…〉 ●eavenly Joy , Hellish Sorrow , or penally●…●●ded Hope . 35. Corollary XII . From this whole Discourse is naturally and necessarily deduc'd this Corollary as a Summary of all that has been said hitherto ; That , There is not the least tittle of our whole Life in which we act as Men , or with perfect Deliberation of our Reason , which is Indifferent ; or that passes Unregarded by the World 's Infinitely-Wise and Just Governour ; but that every such Word , Action , Thought , Gesture , Look or Wish we ever had , and dy'd without altering it , will have ( according as it is well or ill Intended ) Effects , in the other world conformable to it's Nature , and to the Degree of it's Goodness or Badness ; and that , each of them will receive , with most Just and Exact Proportion , Reward or Punishment , by the Course of Natural and Supernatural Causes ; laid and appointed by GOD's Infinite Wisdom for the Eternal Salvation of those who love him , and the Eternal Confusion and Perdition of his Enemies . MEDITATION . WHere art thou now , my Soul , after thou hast abandon'd and flitted from thy Terrene Habitation , and into what strange Ultramundane Region art thou flown in an Instant ? The whole Earth ▪ nay , all Material Nature , seems a contemptible Atome , when thou look'st down upon it from the Transcendent Height of Being , to which the Wisdom and Goodness of thy Creatour , who promotes all his Creatures to those Perfections they art ▪ capable of , has rais'd thee . I see thy Knowledge ▪ that is , thy Essence , stretcht out boyond the Vast Expansion of this Material World's Circumference , and our Firmament bespangled with those Starry Bodies which it contains ; or , rather , I see them all center'd ●… Spiritual and Indivisible . Essence , as in a 〈…〉 Orb of Being . Thou seest now at one 〈…〉 the Whole Sphere of Time sweeping along 〈…〉 ●●● thee ; or , rather , thou comprizest it all in 〈…〉 〈◊〉 Natural Thought : And canst now 〈…〉 more ease comprehend it 's whole Race , than 〈…〉 couldst , while here , resume th●se Fleeting Parts 〈…〉 ( v. g. an Hour or a Day , ) in t one Steady 〈…〉 in which they were all Present and Perma●●nt at once . The whole Bulk of Quantity is in 〈…〉 more Noble Being , without Extension , and the ●●ng Course of Motion , without Succession . But the Extent of thy Actual Knowledge , is nothing in comparison of thy Clear Penetration of those Great , 〈…〉 Various , and Numberless Objects , which are now ●…nted to thy view . What was here Misty and ●●●dy , is now , the Screen of Matter ( the Ground ●● ll Confusedness and Obscurity ) being taken away , 〈…〉 brightly Intelligible with Noon-day Evidence . 〈…〉 clearly , that , if thou hast in this World but ●●●prehended or laid hold of any one Piece of the 〈…〉 Link in the Chain of Causes , which weaves 〈…〉 one orderly Loom all Natural Truths ; thou ●●●est into thee the whole Length of that Line 〈…〉 the First Birth of the World till it expires in●● Eternity : Or rather those Truths are so innext ●…e another by the closest Texture of Identity , 〈…〉 if thou admittest any one of them , all the rest 〈…〉 ●roud themselves into thy Capacious , tho' Space●… Understanding . ●…ow shall we then frame any ●●● Conception of the Difference ●…en thy Former and this Future State ? Or , by what parallel ●hall we illustrate it ? Shall we compare it to the condition of a Child in the Womb on the one side , and of a perfect Man grown up to Rip● Knowledge on the other ? Indeed , this World is but as it were our Second Womb ; Nature is deliver'd of Thee ; and thou art born a Pure Spirit when the Man di●s . Or , Shall we compare these two States to those of a Man , first shut up in a dark Tower ; who can see no Objects about him but when presented before five dim Glasses placed in it's Walls ; but afterwards , when the Tower by some Chance is thrown down , and the Man preserv'd unhurt ; then he can freely range with his Sight all over the large Prospect about him ; and discover , at once , the various Scenes of all the vast circumstant Region , of which he could before take but a scant , obscure and leasurely Survey ! Both those are but lame Comparisons , and far from parallelling the Excess , which this New State of thine has above thy Former one . Thy Capacity in thy purely-Spiritual Condition does Infinitely , that is , beyond Proportion , go beyond that thou hadst in the Body , when it was at it's best : Whereas thy Capacity in the other two States , ( that pretended to parallel this ) being both of them Finite , are very easily Proportion'd : Wherefore we will leave this Consideration to be seriously and at leasure meditated on by those truly Wise Souls , who think it their ▪ highest Concern to reflect on their Future State ; and what Happy or Dismal Consequences attend it ▪ according to the Good or Bad Dispositions they contract here , and carry with them hence . That we may gratefully and humbly acknowledge to whom we owe this Clear Knowledge of our True Last End , the Attaining which is our Only , and Eternal Happiness ; Let us consider how far Natural Reason carry'd those Heathen Philosophers who were the Greatest Masters of Human Science in their ●●●es , and where it stopt . The 〈◊〉 Intelligent Followers of Aristo●●● do gather from his Principles this ●●●●sonant Discourse . The Goods of 〈◊〉 Body are preferrable to those ●● Fortune ; and the Goods of the 〈◊〉 to those of the Body : Wherefore Happiness ●●st consist in something that in the best manner ●●●ects that Part of Man call'd the Soul. Now , the Powers of the Soul are the Understanding and t●● Will : Of which the Understanding is the No●●●● ; because the Will is naturally ordain'd to be ●●●●ed and Govern'd by the Understanding ; and 〈◊〉 Act of the Will , which the previous Reason 〈◊〉 Understanding does not dictate and warrant ▪ ●●llfulness ; which is justly held the Greatest ●●perfection Imaginable . Happiness therefore 〈…〉 be sought for in the Best Perfection of the Understanding . Farther , the Understanding is but a ●●●wer , and Act is better than Power ; for it includes 〈◊〉 , and adds to it the Acting or Exercise of it ; ●●●ch is the Immediate End for which the Power was ●●●n'd ; Therefore Happiness must consist in some 〈◊〉 Perfect Act , of the Understanding . Wherefore , 〈◊〉 Power and it's Acts taking their Degree of Per●●●● from the Clearness of the Sight , and from the ●●●llency of the Object about which they are em●●● ; and the Primum Ens being the most Excellent Object ; it follows , that the Beatitude of Man does 〈◊〉 in the Actual and Clear Knowledge of the First Being ; which in Christian Language , is the seeing GOD face to face , or in the Beatifical Vision . Thus far their Speculative Thoughts rais'd them ▪ But there were other necessary Truths requisite er● Man could be Happy , which were below their short Reach . As , First , That this Contemplation of the First Being must also be most Durable , or never ▪ Interrupted , that is Everlasting ; without which , the Attaining it could be no Happiness ; since the being Depriv'd of so Soveraign and excellent an Object , after having enjoy'd it , and known the Goodness of it by Experience , must needs make them more miserable than they had been , had they not known it at all . Secondly , It must be propos'd to them as a State that is Attainable , and therefore is to be Hoped for . For , let it be never so Gallant a thing in it self , yet unless we could hope to come at it and enjoy it , what is it to us , or how can it possibly be our Happiness ? Thirdly , For want of holding this Blissful State Attainable , and thence making us entertain some Hope of enjoying it , we can never come to love it heartily ; much less place our Chief Affection on it , or bend our Best endeavours to pursue , or gain it . What Man has a hearty Desire to climb to the Moon ? And why not ? Because he judges it impossible , and beyond his Hope . Or what Virtuoso had ever an Effectual Love or Wish to dig to the Center of the Earth , to make curious Observations of the Rarities found there ? And why , but because 't is Hopeless and Impossible ? Wherefore , without holding the Possibility of the thing , 't is impossible to aim at it or intend it . Nay , it must be more than meerly Possible ; it must be Hopeful too , or have some degree of Likelihood that 't is within our Power ●● compass it ▪ otherwise none but a Frantick Man c●● be mov'd heartily to pursue it , much less to take off our Principal Affection from Temporal Goods , ( the ●…ableness of which , in some sort , to our Na●… we experience ) and to place them on Eternal 〈…〉 which we are not assur'd we can ever come to ●… : And yet , without this Predominant Affe●… for our True Happiness , we cannot ( as has 〈…〉 Demonstrated ) be Dispos'd for it , or ever en●… . Behold here the utmost to which meer Natural Reason could raise Souls immerst in Matter ? Behold 〈…〉 most vigorous Efforts of Humane Knowledge , ●…isted by Superiour Light had from Revelation ; 〈…〉 how it falls short in three most Necessary , and 〈…〉 Proper Dispositions , addicting Souls and fitting 〈…〉 connaturally for the Sight of GOD , our only ●…itude ! No wonder then , the Wisest among the ●…ed Heathens , tho' Deum cognoverunt , non ●…n sicut Deum honoraverunt . No wonder , if ●…fible Pleasures , Worldly Interest , and Consuetudo ●…li , did easily draw them , to run along with the ●… ; No wonder , present Temporal Goods did ●…ross ▪ all their Choicest Affections ; and left them ●…ne for Unseen , Future , and Unhop'd for Eter●… Happiness in the Sight of GOD. But 't is the ●…der of Wonders , that those Deists , who hold their 〈…〉 survives , and that it 's True Bliss is to be plac'd 〈…〉 that Beatifical Vision , can , after so many thousand ●…riences how short Nature falls of elevating us ●…m at it , should still maintain that there is no ●…d of Revelation , and Supernatural Assistances ; 〈…〉 so wilfully blind , as not to see and acknowledge 〈…〉 Excellency of Christianity ; and how far it sur●… the Deepest Search and Highest Reach of ●atural Knowledge and Human Philosophy . For their sakes especially , and to make this Truth sink deeper into the Minds of all our Readers , we will give this Point a Second Review . All Mankind have , and ever had , in their Thoughts the Notion of being Happy , since they all know the meaning of the word [ Happiness , ] and that it means Perfect Satisfaction , or the having all they could desire . 'T is what every Man covets , either immediately or ultimately , in all his Wishes ; and pursues in all his Actions . But some sought for this Happiness in some Temporal Good of this World , as Honour , Greatness , Corporeal Pleasure , Riches , &c. Each of them vainly flatter'd themselves , that , that Darling Object of their Affection once obtain'd , they should be satisfy'd , and could wish no more . But , alas ! All of them did by their carriage confess , that after their most successful Acquisitions , they still remain'd as Empty , Hungry , and Dissatisfy'd as formerly . Alexander , after all his fortunate Victories , weeps that there are no more Worlds to Conquer ; Unus Pellaeo iuveni non sufficit orbis , &c. One World suffic'd not the Pellaean King ; Th' Unhappy Youth sweats in that narrow Ring . The Miser , after he has hoarded up immense Banks of Money , is still Covetous of laying up more : Crescit amor Nummi quantum ipsa pecunia cre●cit . Besides he is rack'd with Care of securing it ; and at length he dies Despairing , that he cannot carry along with him his Shining Idol , which he had here so devoutly Ador'd . Wanton Lais , when Age had crippled her feet and wrinkled her face , and made her un●it for pleasure , laments that her holiday Trim ●● short Imaginary Happiness was but the Prologue to ●…eal and never to be released Misery . And the 〈…〉 may be said of all the other Worldlings , who 〈…〉 their Happiness in some Temporal Good. Some 〈…〉 few Philosophers ( as we show'd above ) did in●… by their Reason gain some Glimpse of what 〈…〉 Man 's True Happiness : But it was no more 〈…〉 ● Flash of Light , which disappear'd and dy'd 〈…〉 soon as their Actual Speculation was over : They 〈…〉 laid fast hold of it ; apply'd their Will to it 〈…〉 True Good , rais'd their Hope to it , nor lov'd 〈…〉 pursu'd it above all things ; so that all their ●…wledge of it ended in an Idle Talk , or Airy ●…m . But , Oh! The incomparable Philosophy Re●…d to us by the Wisdom of the Eternal Father ! ●…eanest Scholler of that Divine Master , can tell ●● n●w , that our True Happiness is not plac'd in the ●…isition er Enjoyment of any Goods of this Life , ●…n a never-ending Contemplation of GOD's Es●… in the next . Nor does Revelation only assure 〈…〉 where Happiness is to be found and hoped for ; 〈…〉 it acquaints us , moreover , with all the Methods 〈…〉 Ways how to attain it . It gives us gratis , 〈…〉 assures to us , by well-attested Miracles , the Truth ●…ose Sublime Theses ; which directs the Reason of ●…lators , to show them Agreeable to Natural Princi●… viz. to the Nature of a Soul , and her Affections ; 〈…〉 the Ground whence they spring , to the Nature of ●…re Act , an Infinite Being , and of Beatitude it 〈…〉 For the seeing clearly how Consonant and ●…formable those High Mysteries are to Natural ●… , does comfort Faith in those Faithful ; and 〈…〉 Unbelievers to an Opinion they are True , since they are ( if rightly explicated ) no way Repugnant , 〈…〉 perfectly Agreeable to those Verities , which Nature ●eaches us in gross , and Art demonstrates . Perhaps , the last Corollary of the precedent Chapter may give some Readers frightful Apprehensions , that a Christian Life is Melancholly and full of Anxiety . Indeed to those rechlest Souls ▪ who are resolv'd to mind and pursue nothing but idle Toyes , and think nothing worth their Affection but Fleeting and Perishable Goods , all Discourse of perfecting the Soul as much as is possible , ( in which consists her Compleat Satisfaction or Happiness ) must needs be irksome and tedious : But to those Wiser Souls , who think the Attaining or Falling short of Eternal Bliss is their main Concern , and most worthy their Consideration , it will appear quite otherwise . What Greater Joy , since we know we must die , and that our Soul survives for ever , than to know where our Soul shall go to be Eternally Happy ? What more solid Comfort than ▪ not only to have Assurance what is our True Last End or Felicity , but to know also the Certain Way to attain it ; and that that Way is Easie ? For what can be Easier , or more sutable to the whole Propension of our Nature , than to love that above all things , which is infinitely worthy of our Whole Affection for it's own sake ; and , withall such , that the loving it will make us Eternally Happy ? What easier than to have a good Intention to pursue our own Happiness , and to do nothing that can make us lose it ; and , by losing in undo our selves ? Nothing can endanger our falling short of it , but that Sottish Nonsense , and Ri●icul●us Madness , of preferring a Wretched , Indigent , Empty , Perishable Creature , before our Great and infinitely Good Creatour . Miserable then , and justly most miserable They , who , thro' Neglect of considering what GOD ▪ is in Himself , and what he is to be to us , 〈…〉 for some Momentary and Trifling Content , give 〈…〉 the Reins of their Reason to embrace such an ●…avagant , Pernicious and Blasphemous Folly ! Nor let our daily Failings deter us . The rich ●…-house of most efficacious Motives left to us in 〈…〉 Christian Church , and propos'd by Her , will , if 〈…〉 regard them , and listen to them , very easily ●…rve us from such a Wicked Slighting of our 〈…〉 GOD , our Father , Redeemer , Sanctifier , and 〈…〉 Bountiful Benefactor , as to prefer a poor Crea●… a Thing next to Nothing , before his every way ●…nitely perfect Deity . Now , that Point secur'd , 〈…〉 By-Affections are already in some sort Subordinate 〈…〉 Prevalent Affection for our Eternal and Spiri●… Good ; and therefore , may easily , if care be taken , ●…ally subdu'd to that Soveraign and Predominant 〈…〉 of Heaven ; especially , when Death comes , ●●ich sets all these Worldly Baubles in a true Light , 〈…〉 shows them in their own fading Colours , it will 〈…〉 ●e at all hard to shake off those weak Fetters : ●●e Sacraments usually received at that Season , re●…ing the Soul ; and the Assistance of a Prudent ●●iritual Guide , directing our whole Intention for ●…even , and erecting our Hope to obtain it immedi●…y . Now , when the Soul is thus perfectly set ●…ut , our whole work is at an end for Time and ●…ity ; and our Glorious Reward waits ready for us . ●…deed , the Purifying our Souls to this refined de●… must cost us some labour ; but how Unreasonable 〈…〉 to think , that to enter certainly and immediately 〈…〉 Endless Happiness , is not worth some Pains●…ing ? Especially , if we consider , that Worldlings ●…d Libertines , tho' they put on a Iolly Countenance ●…idst their False Pleasures here , do suffer far more Vexation by giving up the Reins to their unruly Pass●… , than it costs Pious Souls to curb and keep them Subject to Reason ! Nor is our Indulgent Heavenly Father mortally offended at every petty Failing of o●●s Ipse cognovit ●igmentum nostrum , recordatus est quoniam pulvis sumus , Ps. 102. 14. He excuses s●●● of them for their Indeliberateness ; others , because our Ghostly Enemy surpriz'd our short foresight by his wily Ambushes : Others of them are so weaken'd by a Firm and Sincere Resolution to avoid and detest them ▪ that upon our first Recollecting our Christian Principles ▪ they are in a moment Retracted ; or rather , they never sunk into the Substance of our Will , but only swam superficially in our Fancy . Lastly , altho' ( which his Mercy forbid ) we should hap to fall into some Grievous Offence ; there needs no more but heartily to retract our Fault , and to apply to our All-powerf●l Advocate in Heaven , with full Hope in his Merits and Intercession ; and the Syngrapha , or Black-Bill our Condemnation is immediately cancell'd ; the Di●● being abundantly paid by his infinitely Superoga●… Death and Passion . These plain Truths being dul● consider'd , what Life can be so sweet and full 〈…〉 Spiritual Joy as that of a well-meaning Christi●… who sincerely regards his own True Interest , Eter●… Happiness ? And , on the contrary , What Life so U●… comfortable as theirs , who hold their Soul survi●… and must never return to enjoy her too-much belo●… Objects ; and yet had no prospect , whether she must go●… what will become of her for all Eternity . But , Oh! What Tongue of M●… or Angels can express the Ravishin● Transports of Joy which those Happy Souls feel when they are first admitted to the Glorious Sight of that Infinite ●… Being , in whom all Goods that our Boundless 〈…〉 can grasp at , are center'd and emparadis'd ? 〈…〉 my low Conceits , you Blessed Spirits , to lisp out , 〈…〉 least , some faint Resemblance of their Amazing ●…ie , that so , I may excite my self and my Readers ●…rdent Love of that Blissful State. But I ask ●…bles ▪ For not even your selves , tho' you expe●… it , are able to declare it ; and , tho' you could 〈…〉 it , yet our Rudeness could not understand the ●…age of your Celestial Country , untravell'd by us ●…ls , and remov'd by a vast Chasm from our Ter●… Habitation . That B. Apostle , who was rapt to ●…hird Heavens , checks all such bold Attempts , by ●…g us , That Non licet homini loqui , that is , 〈…〉 Impossible for a Man to speak those Unuttera●… Arcana Verba ; tho' perhaps that signal favour 〈…〉 him at that Season , was infinitely short of the ●…ical Vision it self . 'T is enough , that the same 〈…〉 1 Cor. 2. 9. has told us , That Eye has not 〈…〉 nor Ear heard , nor has it ascended into the ●…t of Man to conceive what God has prepar'd 〈…〉 those who love him . 'T is enough , That the ●…nal Wisdom himself has assur'd us , ( Luk. 6. 38. ) ●…st comprehensive words , strain'd to the highest ●…osis , and redoubled with a still-increasing Energy , 〈…〉 Good ( or Full ) Measure , prest close down , ●…haken together to make the Vessel hold more , ●…eapt up till it runs over , shall they give into 〈…〉 Bosom . Nothing will be defalkt from the ●…t Satisfaction we shall experience when we come ●…ve our Rich Reward , by Antecedent and Over●…g Expectation ; as it happens in our False ●…s here ; which we do oft-times , or rather always ●…ncy . It will be inconceiveably beyond all we ●…ld imagine ; insomuch , that tho' we had spent our whole Life in sharpest Tortures here for Heaven's sake , we shall be astonisht and Amaz'd at the Infinite Over-proportion which such Unspeakable and Eternally secure Bliss bears to such slight and momentary Sufferings . Bright Fountain of Eternal Light , whose ever-Noon-day Rays no Night darkens , no Gloud ( but that of Sin ) eclipses . Give us Grace to sink deep and fix steadily in our Mind this most Solid , most Clear , and most Important Truth ; that , as to live for ever in a dark Dungeon would be highly Disastrous to our Bodily Sight , and the seeing the Chearful Rays of the Day , is the only true Perfection , Comfort , and Satisfaction of our Corporeal Eye : So , when our Soul , now Separate , comes to be altogether one Intellectual Eye ; her falling short for ever of seeing thy Divine Essence , ( her only True Light , for which , as her Last End , she was Created ) will certainly plunge her in a Dismal Hell of Torment and Misery ; Since Nothing but the Clear Sight of thy Glorious Being can be able to give her True and Eternal Happiness ; in whose Face is the Fullness of Joy , and at thy right hand Pleafures for evermore , Psalm 16. 11. CHAP. II. Of the Existence , Knowledge , Distinction , and Action of ANGELS . 1. THE Order of Things requires that there should be Different Kinds of Entitles , arising gradually to Higher Perfection under the Notion of Ens. For , since , were all Things of the same pitch of Perfection , or all of One Sort , the Creation would look like a Confused Multitude , or ( as it were ) a Heap of Things , and quite destitute of Order ; which , by placing them in Due Ranks of Superiority and Inferiority , makes up this Harmony which beautifies the World. Again , since there can be no Distinction , nor , consequently , any Ground of Order under the Notion of Ens , but it must be made by Intrinsecal Differences , or such as are found within the Precincts of that Line ; that is , ( as is Demon●●rated in my METHOD to Science , B. I. L. 3. ●● . 1. 2. &c. ) by Partaking More and Less of that Common Notion ; and , what has More of it , ●ontains what has Less , and superadds to it ; and , ●●●●quently , is more perfect under that Notion 〈◊〉 the other ; which several or Distinct Degrees ●f Perfection , when they come to be Excessive , ●o constitute divers Sorts , Kinds or Species of it ▪ ●●s ; therefore , Evident , out of the Order of the World , which is the Workmanship of the First Being ; and is also Logically Demonstrated , that 't is Requisite there should be Different Kinds of Things , arising Gradually to higher Perfection under the Notion of Ens. This is seen almost to our Eye in the Predicamental Scale of Substance ; where we find the several kinds of Ens gradually Descending in one of the Collateral Lines , as to the Extent of their Notion ; but Increasing or Ascending as to their Degrees of Perfection ; v. g. Body , Mixt , Vegetable , Sensitive , Rational . Which Orderly Distinction is not invented by us , ( as are the imaginary Lines in the Heavens put by Astronomers , ) but Copy'd from Nature . 2. Hence follows immediately and necessarily without Proof , that there ought , à fortiori , to be Pure Acts , or ANGELS , Created , unless they be Incapable of Being ; that is , Chimerical , or Non-Entia . Otherwise the Order of Entities had been Maim'd and Imperfect in its Principal or most Noble Part. 3. The Angelical Essence is Capable of having Existence given it . For , since the reason why Individual Bodies have Title to have Existence given them , is , because , by their peculiar Complexion of Accidents , they are become Distinct from all others , or Determinate under the Notion of such an Ens , o● Body ; and this Distinction or Determination springs from it's Act or Form ; and , consequently , the Act , which gives Determinations to all others , cannot but be Determinate it self ; a forti●●● , the Nature or Essence of a Pure Act bears in it's Notion , that it is of it 's own Nature , or Essentially , Determinate in the Line of Ens ; and more Capable of Existence than any other sort of Ens whatever . Again , since ( as was shown , Book I. ●● . 1. § . 6. ) the Essence of all Einite Entities consists in their Possibility or Non-Repugnance to Existence ; and , there can be no shadow of Impossibility , but much more Reason , that the Nature of a Pure Act should exist , than that Bodies should , that have Matter or Power in them , which i● of it self the Principle of Indetermination and Confusion ; in regard this Indetermination makes Bodies less fit for Existence ; or rather , did not the Act determine the Power , or Matter , utterly Unfit . Wherefore , seeing it belongs to the First Being to give to his Creatures what they are Capable of ; especially when it consists with the Best Order of the World , as is shown § . 1. this does : It follows , that he has given to that Nature or Essence which is a Pure Act , that is , to the Angelical Nature , to Exist ; and , consequently , ANGELS are . Which is farther Demon●●rated by the following Medium , showing that , otherwise , there had wanted a Proper or Immediate ●●●se of Motion . 4. Every Thing acts it is : Wherefore Imperfect Agents do produce first that part of the Effect which is Imperfect , and thence proceed to what 's 〈◊〉 perfect ; as we see all Natu●●● Agents do : But , Perfect Agents , and most especially , that Agent which is 〈◊〉 Perfect , produces first that Effect which is most Perfect , or most Like ▪ it self . Wherefore the First and Immediate Effect produced by GOD is Existence , it being the most perfect of any thing found in Creatures . To proceed , Since nothing is more Preposterous , and contrary to Reason , than to order that which is most perfect , as a Means to produce that which is Less-perfect , it follows that GOD's Wisdom does not order Existence , which , ( as being most Actual ) is most perfect of any thing found in Creatures ; it does not , I say , order It , as a Means to cause any thing that is less perfect , than it self is . Wherefore , whatever less perfect Effect is produced by GOD , ( as Motion is ) it must either have been caus'd by him , because it is necessarily concomitant to Existence , or else necessarily consequent to it : But Motion is neither necessarily Concomitant nor Consequent to Existence : For , let us put diverse Bodies to be Created in Rest , ( as they must be in the First Instant they were Created , ere Motion began ) they would have ▪ in that Case , all that is requisite to Existence ; nor would Motion follow meerly upon their being put to Exist . Therefore , some other Cause is requisite to produce the First Motion of Bodies . Which since it can neither be a Body , as is granted , and indeed , in a manner Self-evident ; nor GOD , as was now proved ; nor a Separated Soul , for this presupposes the Motion of Bodies to her Being ; it must be some other Cause distinct from all these : But no other Cause is imaginable or possible to be assign'd , but some Creature which is a Pure Act , or an Angel. Therefore , as certain as it is , that there is Motion ▪ so certain it is that Angels are . Nay , so impossible it is , that Motion can be Concomitant to the First Existence of Bodies , that 't is a Contradiction they should be together in Duration , or at once ; For , Existence , it having ●● parts , is Indivisible in Duration , or without part after part ; whereas 't is Essential to Motion to be part after part , or Successive . So that 't is equally Contradictory , that Existence should not be all at once , as 't is , that Motion should be all at once , so far is the Later from being Consequent or Concomitant to the Former . 5. This is farther Demonstrated from the Nature of Causality , by this Argument . No Effect can proceed immediately from a Cause which is of a Nature diametrically Opposite to such an Effect . V. g. Not-being cannot produce Being ; Light cannot produce Darkness ; not can that which is essentially ●●● immediately produce Cold. But Motion , which is essentially Successive , or ( which is the same ) perpetually Changing , is diametrically Opposite to the Nature of GOD whose Essence is Unchangeable Existence : Therefore Motion cannot be produced by GOD as it's Immediate Cause . Wherefore , since by our former Discourse , the ●●● Motion of Bodies could not have been immediately produced , either by any meer Body , ●o● by a Human Soul , nor yet by GOD ; it is 〈◊〉 that it could only be caus'd by a Pure Act , ●● an Angel. See Method to Science , Pag. 299. ●●●●●s 4. Ideae Cartesianae , P. 44. § . 31. and Rail●●● Defeated , § . 43. where this Demonstration is ●● large put down , and prest home . What I ●●●tend for here , is , that the Contrary Tenet ●●erthrows all Likeness of the Cause and Effect , ●●d all Causality ; and therefore all Connexion of Proper Causes with their Proper Effects , and Vice Versâ ; that is , it quite destroys all Possibility of Science and Demonstration . Notwithstanding , 't is Granted , that GOD is the Mediate , Remote , or Principal Cause of Motion ; as giving Second Causes both the Power to move Bodies , and Pre-moving or Determining them to move them . 6. Every more perfect Ens contains or includes in it the Nature of the less perfect . Thus , ( as was said ) the Nature of a Mixt or Compound Body ( having diverse Elements in it ; and therefore having more of the Nature of Body than a Simple Body , or any one Element has ) includes in it the Nature or Essence of a Simple Body . Thus , and for the same reason , a Vegetative Mixt , has more of the Nature of a Mixt in it , than a meerly-Mixt , such as are Pebbles , Clay , Gold , or such like . Thus Sensitive Things include in them the Nature of a Vegetable ; and every Rational Animal includes in it the Nature of a meer Sensitive Thing or an Animal . All which are Evident ; because the Perfecter Ens has in it the Notion or Nature of the Imperfecter , and superadds something to it . So that to deny the force of this Demonstration , or the Truth it demonstrates , is the same Folly as to deny , that what has more in it of any Kind does not contain in it what 's Less of the same Kind ; or that , what 's a Whole ( in respect of the other ) is not more than a Part of it , or , ( which is the same ) that a Whole does not contain or include it's Parts . And that they include them Essentsally , is most Evident to all Logicians , and granted by all ; while they acknowledge those Later or less perfect Notions to be essentially predicated of the former , in regard they superadd to them nothing that 's Positive . 7. Wherefore , for the same Reason , Every Pure Act , Spirit , or Angel , includes in it self , one way or other , the whole Nature of Body . For , since Ens is adequately divided into Pure Acts , or Spirit and into those Entities whose Essences are alloy'd with Power and Potentiality , ( as are Bodies , which are compounded of Matter and Form ; ) and these two Species are constituted , as by it's Intrinsecal Differences , by partaking ●●●e and less of Ens , their Genus ; and that which is more in any Kind or Respect , includes what 's Less in the same respect ; as a Yard in Quantity contains an Inch , which is Less under that Notion , or a Lesser Quantity . Hence , it follows demonstratively , that the self-same Discourse must equally hold in the Species of Ens , as it does in those of Quantity now mention'd ; or in the Species of any other Genus ; and , consequently , that a Pure Act , or Spirit , must include some way or other , the whole Nature of Body , which has less of the Nature of Ens in it , than had the other . 8. Wherefore the very Essences of all Natural Bodies are really and truly contain'd in the Knowledge of an Angel , and not their Ideas or Similitudes only . For , since it is granted , that Angels , they being Pure Acts , are of an Indivisible Nature or void of Quantity ; the Essences of Bodies , which by § . 7. are one way or other , contain'd or included in an Angel , cannot be included in it Quantitatively ; after the manner a Vessel contains Liqu●ur , or as a Bigger Box contains a Lesser . Wherefore , it must be said , that those Lesser Essences of Body are contain'd in the Superiour Essence of an Angel Indivisibly ; or after the manner of a Spirit , that is , Knowingly , or as Objects of their Knowing Power ; which was the Point to be Demonstrated . 9. Wherefore , he who denies , that the very Essences of Bodies are in the Understanding of an Angel , or , in any Spiritual Nature , and affirms , that only the Similitudes of them are there ; may , as well say , the Essences or Natures of Simple Bodies are not in Mixts ; or that the Essences of meer Vegetatives are not in Sensitive Things or Animals ; or that the Essence of an Animal is not really in a Rational Thing or a Man , but Likenesses only ; which is both against the Sentiments of all Logicians in the world , who do acknowledge that the Former are Essential Predicates of the Later , ( and not Accidental ones ; ) which could not with Truth be said , unless the Essences themselves , from which the Denomination of [ Essential ] is taken , were really in them : Nay , it is moreover , against the Definitions of these Later , in which those Former are found . I add , against the Sense of all Mankind too , who reflect upon what they say . Whence , those Ideists , who hold the contrary Opinion , are desir'd to take notice that our Argument here is drawn from the Notion of the Thing , as it is a Thing or ●●●tance ; and from the Nature of the Species of ●● , as such ; and not from the Qualities or Relations of them , from whence their Likeness or Un●●●ness is taken . Which clinches the force of our demonstration drawn from Logick and Metaphysicks , and will forestall and defeat all the Op●●ion that can be made against it . 10. Corollary I. Our foregoing Discourses being chiefly built on that piece of Doctrine in my Method , B. I. L. 3 , § . 2. that all Intrinsecal or Essential Differences in any Predicament , or under whatever Notion , are nothing else but More and Less of that Notion ; therefore , since so much stress is put upon this Thesis , I beg of my Readers to peruse attentively the Third Chapter of my Method to Science ; my Ideae Cartesianae Expensae , Pag. 51 , 52 , 53. and Raillery Defeated , § . 72. where this Position is at large explicated and defended against the Mistakes of my Opposers . Which I do the rather Request , because , however it may seem New , yet I dare affirm , that , besides it 's being perfectly Demonstrable , no one Rule in Logick is more Useful to keep our Notions Distinct , or to frame Right Definitions , or to Discourse solidly or exactly . 11. Corollary II. What 's deduc'd here of the very Essences of things being intellectually , or as Objects , in the Understanding of an Angel does for the same reason hold in every Spiritual or Cognoscitive Nature ; and consequently , in the Soul , whether in the Body , or Separated ▪ the Argument being grounded on the Nature of a Spirit ; and it 's being Superiour to the Nature of Body . 12. Corollary III. For the same reason what has been discourst before of the Immutability of a Soul , while Separated , and of her Final or Eternal State , ( springing from her Choice of a wrong Last End , if unretracted before Death ) may , Mutatis M●tandis , be apply'd to an Angel , without needing Repetition , or farther Enlarging upon it . 13. Since the Essence or Nature of an Angel is to be after such a manner Cognoscitive , the Distinction of Angels must consist in their being more or less thus Cognoscitive This is already Demonstrated ; because , by the Doctrine lately given , all the Intrinsecal , or Essential Differences , under whatever Kind or Notion , are nothing but more or less of the Common Notion , or the partaking of it unequally . 14. Yet this Degree of Cognoscitiveness , which ●●●●itutes Distinct Angels , must understood of the Intenseness ● their Knowledge , or the Penetrativeness of their Knowing Po●● . For , since every Pure Act ●●is shown above , and particu●●● Raillery Defeated , P. 89 , 90. ) ●●ws All things ; it cannot be understood of the Extent of their Knowledge , or that one of them knows a Greater Number of things than Another ; It must therefore be meant , ●● One of them knows things more perfectly , ●●● clearly , thorowly , or deeply , than Another ●●● . Which , as may be seen in my Ideae Cartesianae , P. 68 , 69. may spring from two Causes . O● ▪ Because , Eorum aliqui magis perspica●i Intel●●● acie praediti sunt quàm alii ; which seems ●● be most Essential to them . The Other , Because by their seeing better the First Cause it self , they must better , and withal more solidly and ●●●ndedly , know those Effects that spring ●●●m that Supreme Cause . 15. Corollary IV. From this Greater or Lesser Excess of Knowledge , as thus explicated , as far as Natural Reason carries us , are taken the Diverse Orders of Angels . All farther or more particular Disquisition concerning the Three Hierarchies , and Nine Quires of Angels , is left to Divines , gathering them from Holy Writ and the Antient Mysticks . A Philosopher must step no farther than he can tread sure upon his own Firm Grounds . 16. Corollary V. From our Discourse about Human Souls and Angels will be seen in what different manner , and by what means , an Angel , and a Humane Soul , when Separate , come to know all things . The Later , by Notions , caus'd at first by Impressions on the Senses , and improv'd into Iudgments and Discourses . The Former , by Knowledge , not Acquir'd , but Innate . The First and Immediate Objects of both of them is Themselves or their own Essence : Whence a Soul , in regard it's Body ( and , consequently , the Determination of the Degree of Rationality it had ) grew , as it were , out of Natural Causes ; knows all things , as first Connected with her self , then with one another in the well-linkt Chain of those Causes ; in which there can be no Flaw or Interruption . But an Angel knows all Things , by Transcending from one Ens or one Degree of Entity to another , and this Intuitively ; that is , an Angel by knowing it self , knows what place it bears in the Order of Angels or Spirits : And , since it could not know it 's own particular pitch or Individuality , but by knowing how high or low it is in the Order of Angelical Beings ; nor could this be known but by knowing the whole Order , because in an Order which is contriv'd after the best manner , each part is proportion'd in exact Symmetry to the rest : Hence , the Knowledge of that whole Order , and consequently of each part of it , or each Entity in the whole Creation , is Due to it's Nature ; and , therefore is given it . As for the Knowledge of Corporeal Nature , 't is below them both , and therefore both of them comprehends it Knowingly , as is deduced above . Lastly , The Soul gains her Knowledge by Abstract or Inadequate Notions , and by Discourse ; whereas an Angel knows at once the Whole Entities , and all that belongs to them ; and this , not by Discourse or Reflex Thoughts ; but by a Direct , Penetrative and Comprehensive Intuition . 17. There is , besides those Differences amongst Angels mention'd , § . 13. 14. and C●roll . V. Another , arising from the several Degrees or rather Manners of that Cognoscitiveness which is Essential to them , viz. That some of them know more things by One Operation or Act of Knowledge , or , as it were , by one Thought , than Another does ; which happens because the Object of each Thought which some of them have , is more Universal than are the Objects of those Thoughts that others have Parallels of which may be found among our several Sorts of Knowers or Philosophers here . Some treat of such particular Sorts of Quantities or Figures ; Others , of Quantity or Figure in their whole Latitude , or i● Common . Some Philosophers have for the Objects of their Knowledge such a sort of Ens ; as Minerals , or such a Species of Birds or Beasts : Others , raise their Thoughts to contemplate Body or Ens in their whole Extent , as do Metaphysicians . But , with this difference , which renders them Unparallel , that our Science is employ'd about Abstract Notions of the Thing ; that is , about the Thing consider'd in such an Abstracted or Common Respect , without descending to the Under-Kinds or to the Individuums under it ; whereas , the Intuitive Knowledge of an Angel , as not being made by way of Abstract or Inadequate Conceptions , comprehends in one Act , or at once , the Individualities of all those Things , ( from which We abstract one Common Notion ) and all that belongs to them . Whence , when we said ▪ that the Generical Notion , common to all Angels , is to be Cognoscitive , it is to be understood of an Intuitive Cognoscitiveness , or such a one as we have describ'd above ; by which they are distinguisht from the Inferiour or Narrower Degree of Knowingness peculiar to the Soul in this State ; and even , in some respect , as she is found in her State of Separation . 18. The same is evinced by Reason . For , since the Object speci●ies the Act , and the Excellency of the Act argues a more excellent Faculty or Power , and consequently , a more Excellent Degree of the Essence or Nature of the Acter ; and , since Bonum , ( I add [ Verum , ] this being the Best and most Connatural Good of a Knowing Creature ) quò Communius eò Divinius ! It follows , that the Essence of those Angels are more Excellent and Noble , who have a more Comprehensive and Larger Knowledge of more Universal Objects , at once , or by one Act ; whence it comes that ( since Reflexion or Deliberation can have no place in Pure Acts , but are contrary to their Nature ) they are fitted for the Overseeing more-Common Goods , or to preside over the Spiritual Good of Provinces , Kingdoms , or great Nations of People . 19. Corollary VII . That which gives greater force to this Doctrine , is the Consonancy it has to the Sacred Scripture : Where , ( Daniel , Ch. 10. ) we read of the Angel of the Kingdom of Persia , withstanding that particular Angel ( in likelihood Gabriel ) who presided over the Iews ; till Michael , who was Higher in Dignity than the former , being Chief Patron and Defender of the Jewish Church then , as he is held to be of the Christian Church now , over-power'd his Inclination by his more Soveraign Influence . Where also we read of the Angel who was Prince or Super-intendent over the Greeks ; divers of which sort , if not all , were Archangels : Whereas 't is generally held , and is Consonant to Reason , That the Angel-Guardians of Particular or Individual Persons are of the Lowest , and least-Cognoscitive , Quire of meer Angels . Thus far concerning the Essence and Internall Operations of Angels ; We proceed now to their External Operation , or their Action upon other Things . 20. An Angel cannot operate upon another Angel , so as to make it otherwise than it was . For , since that Operation must work some new Effect in it ; and this requires some Passive Principle , in the Subject , rendring it Mutable , which Principle we call Matter : And Angels , they being Pure Acts , have not that sort of Power call'd Matter in them ; it follows , that an Angel cannot thus operate upon another Angel ; nor , for the same reason , upon a Soul , while 't is Separate . 21. Wherefore , all such External Operation of an Angel can be only upon Bodies . For , since an Angel can neither thus operate upon , that is , alter another Angel , nor a Separated Soul , because they are Pure Acts ; much less GOD , who is an Infinitely Pure Act , and essentially Immutable ; and there is no other Subject imaginable ; it follows , that the External Operation of Angels must either be exercis'd on Bodies , or on Nothing . 22. An Angel can operate upon Material Entititles , or on Body . For , since the Being of an Angel is Superiour to the Nature of Body ; and , consequently , it 's Faculty or Power of Acting is Superiour to whatever is in Body that can resist it's Activity : Also , since ▪ being a Pure Act , it 's Nature is Active . Wherefore , seeing , on the other side , Matter is easily , or rather essentially Passive ; and there can want no Application of such an Agent to such a Patient , because an Angel has the Natures or Essences , nay , the Existences of Bodies , and all that can belong to them , intimately joyn'd to their Understanding by Knowledge of them : 'T is Evident that there are all the Requisites imaginable put for their Operating upon Body , and producing some Effect in it , which was not in it before ; that is , of Changing it . Wherefore , an Angel has Power to Operate this upon Body or Material Nature . Nor is there any Disproportion between the Motion which the Angel works in Bodies , and such an Immediate Cause , as was shown , § . 5. is between GOD and such an Effect ; since , as has been shown , Method to Science , B. I. L. 8. § . 2. Motion , according to it 's precise Nature , or as it superadds to it's Subject , is as it were made up of Non-Entities , or next to nothing ; and every Created Being , as to what it has of it self , is such : All the Essential ▪ Distinction between Creatures , and consequently their Formal Constitution being only such and such Limitations of Being ; or more and less , that is , thus much and no more of Entity . 23. Advertisement . Let it be noted , that what 〈…〉 intend to evince here , is con●…'d to the Question An est ; or , ●…o demonstrate that Angels have Power to move Bodily Nature ; ●…od not to show How , or in what ●…articular Manner , they work this effect . To clear which Point , requires a perfect and penetrative Knowledge of the Angelical Nature ; which is perhaps Unattainable by us in this State. 24. Notwithstanding what 's said , no One Angel has an Unlimited Power to move , or change , all the Bodies in the World. For , since the Natures of Spirit and Body are constituted by their Partaking More and Less of Ens ; and , more and less do manisestly signifie , only Degrees of the Nature of Ens in Common , from whence their Power over another is taken , and on which it is entirely and adequately grounded ; and what exceeds another only in some Degree , does only exceed it Finitely , Limitedly , and in some Proportion : It follows , that however the whole ▪ Angelical Nature , or some considerable Part of it , may have Power to work upon , or alter , the whole Mass of Material Beings ; yet a Single Angel , being but one Individual of it , and , consequently , inconsiderable in comparison of the Whole , tho' it may change some Part or Parts of it ; yet , it 's Activity , ( which consists in it's Addiction to do that Effect , or in it's Act of Voliti●● , and not in it's bare Knowledge of it ) is stinted to a certain Proportion of Matter ; according to the Greater or Lesser Excellency of it's Essence ; from which it's Activity springs , and to which it goes parallel . 25. An Angel can easily , and in an Impercepti●… Time , order and alter that Quantity of Matter , or those Bodies that are within the Bounds of it ▪ Activity ; which generally speaking , are only those which it superintends ; an●… also those material Causes , which are requisite as fit Instruments for Holy Angels , to do Men Good or Protect them ; or for Bad Angels to do them Harm or Punish them ; as sutes best with GOD's Mercy or ●ustice . For , since all Motion proceeds from Angels as Second Causes ; and that , by knowing all Nature Intuitively , their Knowledge reaches not only to the Subject or Patient which is to be alter'd , but to every imaginable circumstance , either belonging to the said Patient , or to those Material Agents , which being apply'd , are proper to work upon them : It follows , that this , alone , must needs wonderfully facilitate the Effect . Again , since those Acts of the Angel's Will , which were the Efficient Causes of Altering those Bodies , were , of themselves ▪ Instantaneous : It follows , that tho' the Nature of the Patient , which is Material or Quantitative , would not permit the Effect or Change to be put , by a ●…ite Power , in an Instant ; yet all imaginable Requisites do concur to produce in it such , or as little , a Time as the perfect Subjection of the Patient can bear , and as the Activity of the Agent , which acts , on it's part Instantaneously , requires ; that is ▪ in a very Imperceptible Time. And accordingly , ( 1 Cor. 15. v. 51 , 52. ) the Holy Scripture tells us , that the Change of those Bodies which survive at the Resurrection , from a Corruptible to an Incorruptible Condition , ( the ●…rangest Change Matter can possibly bear ! ) will be made in a moment , in the twinkling of an Eye , that is , in the least time we are able to conceive . 26. Corollary VIII . Whence , it being so consonant to the Natures of Things , viz. to the Activity of Angels , and to the Passiveness of Matter , our meer Naturalists need not wonder , that the Prophet Habbacuc was carried so suddenly ( Dan. 14. 35. ) by an Angel , impetu Spiritus sui , as the Scripture expresses it to Daniel in the Lion's Den at Babylon , ( a place unknown to the Prophet , and therefore very far off , ) so quickly ; which can scarce be conceiv'd possible to be done so suddenly , without strangely disordering , and even killing him , without taking from the Air all power of Resistence . Nor need it be wonder'd at , that a Light shone so suddenly in St. Peter's Prison ; nor that his Chains fell off , and that the Iron-Gate open'd to them of it's own accord , ( Act. 12. ) nor that all the Guards were stupify'd with a dead Sleep . Nor that Angels so suddenly make to themselves a Body of Air to appear in ▪ and as suddenly disappear again ; Nor , at many other such like Effects , related in Holy Writ . None of these , I say , ought to appear Wonderful to any Solid Philosopher who attends to his Principles , and True Reason . For , since the Motion of Bodie ( and therefore all Action ) springs from Angels as the Immediate Causes ; their Activity upon Bodily Substances , so Inferiour t● them , must needs be very Soveraign and Powerful . Nor is there any thing in th● whole Discourse , or in any of these an● such like Particular Actions , which does not subsist upon Solid Grounds , and is not built upon , and is consonant to , Evident Principles of Reason . 27. Corollary IX . From what has been deduced formerly , we may Collect , as most Agreeable to Rational Principles , that those Angels , or Ministring Spirits , who , by their Office are to work upon Matter ; and are , with good reason , hold to be those of the lowest Quire ; and , particularly , the Angel Guardians , should , at the General Resurrection be employ'd in Changing the Mass of pre-existent Matter ( for we cannot think Creation begins a-new when the World is near an end ) into Human Bodies ; fitted according to the respective Dispositions of the Holy and the Wicked Souls ; as is seen , ( Mat. 13. ) where the Harvest is said to be the Resurrection , and the Angels the Reapers , gathering the good Seed to be eternally preserv'd ; and the Tares to be burnt : We may hence also ▪ clearly gather , that the Chief Overseeing that Grand Affair belongs to the Superiour Influence of an Arch-Angel ; signify'd Metaphorically , ( 1 Thessal . 4. 15. ) by the Voice of an Archangel , and his Trumpet , blowing to summon the Dead to appear before Christ's Dread Tribunal . Which , understood literally , is the putting them , or making them to appear in their Distinct Ranks according to their several Merits or Demerits , that Christ may judge them by discriminating the Sheep from the Goats ; that is , by Beatifying the Former , and Establishing them in Sanctity , and , the Reward of it , Glory ; and the Later ( as the Nature of their State requires ) unchangeably in Sin , and consequently , Damnation ; as is emphatically exprest in our Saviours Words , ( Apoc. 22. 11. ) He that is Unjust , let him be Unjust still ; and he that is Filthy , let him be Filthy still ; and he that is Righteous , let him be Righteous still ; and he that is Holy , let him be Holy still . Which Final Sentence forbids and precludes to the Damned , all hope of Change , or fruitful Repentance ; and fixes them Unalterably , and for ever in their Sinful State , and consequently in Eternal Death , which is the Reward , and Connatural Effect or Fruit of Sin. Whence also we see the reason of that severe Saying , Ex inferno nulla Redemptio ; and why their Bad and Unchangeable Affections , which so strongly detain them there , are called Rudentes Inferni , 2 Pet. 2 ▪ 4. 28. Corollary X. For the reason given above , all the Affairs of very High moment are said to be done by an Archangel . Thus Michael made head against Lucifer , and subdu'd him . Thus Gabriel , the Archangel , was the Messenger of the Incarnation . Nor can it be doubted but the Head of those Angels which gave the Law on Mount Sina , as is written , Acts 7. 38. and v. 53. was of the same Dignity : Nor that those Intelligences which give and continue Motion to the Matter of ours , and of all the other , Suns , ( if that opinion may be allow'd which holds all the Fixed Stars to be so many Corpora per se lucentia , or so many Suns ) are all of them of the same high Excellency ; since upon that Motion , given by them , every single Action of all the Bodies throughout the vast Regions , which those Luminaries do enlighten and influence , does wholly depend . 29. From the Unchangeable Nature of a Pure Act , or an Angel , which we have Demonstrated above , 't is evidently Deduced , that whatever Intellectual Light the Inferiour Angels , did ( as was most Requisit and Fit ) receive from the Superiour ones , was imparted to them as soon as they were , or was Co-aeve to their Being . This is evident from the Immutability of a Pure Spirit , and needs no farther Proof ; since , if they had any thing a-new , they must have been Chang'd . 30. 'T is likewise Evident , That , since every Angel did comprehend all Material Nature , and consequently , every least circumstance of it ; they did from the very Creation , ( as far as was on their part ) stand over Ready and Bent with their Will to act upon Matter , in such precise junctures , and in that very manner , in which , and according to which , they knew they were by the Divine Appointment , to exert their Active Power ; without needing any New Motive , or any New Change fitting or Disposing them to act hic & nunc . This follows manifestly from the same Principle . Wherefore the Resistance of one Angel to another , and such like Expressions , neither ought , nor need , be so interpreted as to a gue their Ignorance of what they were to do , Defeat of their Intentions , or Opposition to one anothers Will ; but in the plain obvious Sense , as when we use to say , [ I had gone about such a Business , but that such Causes made me see it was impracticable , or imprudent to attempt it ; or , I could not come till it had done Raining . ] So that it was a Natural Opposition , ( as it were ) and not a Moral on ; which is between the Good Angels . For Example : The Angel of the Princ● of Persia had a desire to do the Persians all the good he could , ( it being his Province and Duty ) which was to keep the Iews there still ; by which means the Persians might better learn the Knowledge of the true GOD. And the Angel of the Iews desir'd to deliver them from Captivity , that so they might serve GOD and observe the Law better in their own Country . These were the particular Inclinations of each of them , all other Considerations being Abstracted or set aside . GOD had prefixt a determinate time of their Deliverance , and of comforting Daniel in the Interim . Both of them knew GOD's Will and submitted to it . Yet the Angel of Persia acting for his Province , and detaining the Iews till the prefixt time came , was the reason why the Jewish Angel could not , till that time came , act for their Deliverance : Whereas , had there been another state of things , and had not he obviated the particular propension of the Jewish Angel , he had sooner assisted them , and come to Daniel . 31. From the Nature and Genius of Good and Bad Angels , and from this consideration , that GOD's Wisdom makes use of the properest Instruments to perform his Will , we may conclude , that , as he orders the Good Angels to protect , guide and inspire Pious Souls , and procure their Good ; so he sends , and orders , Bad and Malignant Spirits , his Executioners , to inflict Punishments on Misdeservers ; to do which , their inveterate Malice to Mankind gives them most eager Propensions . As appears in the Disasters which befel Iob ; and may also be collected from Psalm 78. 45. Prov. 15. 11. Iudges 9. 23. and Kings 22. 22. and divers other Texts . MEDITATION . LET us now , my Soul , look down upon those Low and Despicable Essences , from which we took our Rise ; and we shall see to what an Unexpected Height we have climb'd . Our Steps , were , indeed , all the way Immediate ; yet , it has cost us some panting Labour ere we could mount to the Superiour Region of Beings . We have transcended our own Essence , and wound our selves up by the Connected Chain of our Reason , twisted of our Natural Notions , as high as the Lower Story of Heaven ; and gain'd some Acquaintance with those Winged Inhabitants of it , the ANGELS ; the Contemplation of whose Essences does confine next upon that of the Adorable DEITY it self . We behold , with Admiration , those Bright Beings ; whose Understandings are guilded and beautify'd with Pure Rays of Intellectual Light ; streaming , together with their Essence , from the inexhausted Source and Luminary of all Knowledge , Essential Truth . Nay , we can , moreover , take a Steady View of their Eminent Nature without those Astonishing Extasies , which so surpris'd Daniel , Esdras , and the Eagle-ey'd Evangelist himself . And , notwithstanding , we see them all over bespangled with the most glittering Truths ; yet our Eyes , tho' weak , are not dazled , nor our Thoughts distracted with Fear and Horrour , as were those others to whom they appear'd . But 't is , because we see them at distance thro' the Dull Optick of our Natural Speculation ; not neer at hand , nor clad in those Majestick Resemblances , which they put on when they were to represent the great King of Glory , whose Embassadors they were . Our Reason has ascertain'd us that there may and must be such Things as Pure Acts or ANGELS : That being in the Climax of Entities , Superiour to Bodies ; they do , therefore , Include and Comprehend in themselves , after their manner , ( that is , Knowingly , ) the very Essences of Bodies , their Underlings . That , being depur'd from that Passive Principle , Matter , and , withall , being the Immediate Cause of all Motion , and , consequently , of all Action , in the Material World ; their Nature , is in the highest manner , Active ; whence , they come necessarily to be endow'd with a Power to work upon Corporeal Nature , which is essentially Passive ; and this with an Incredible Celerity : Also , that being free from the Alloy of Matter , the Principle of all Mutability , they are , of their own Nature , Unchangeable . We have gain'd certain Light , how they are to be distinguished into their several Ranks or Kinds ; and that those Lower Sorts of them , which are employ'd in the managing Material Nature , and procuring the Good of Mankind , ( for whose sake the Corporeal World was made , ) have , as is most sitting , Larger or Narrower Provinces assign'd them ; according to the Dignity and Excellency of their Essences , to which their Power of Acting is proportion'd . We have seen how consonant to Reason those passages of the Holy Scriptures are , which deliver to us narratively many Actions done , and Effects produced , by those Administring Angels ; and how we are to understand divers Places there , in which Sacred Writers accommodate themselves to our Rude Fancies . Tho' GOD's Wisdom has laid Means for our Natural Knowledges in the works of the Creation , yet 't is below the Dignity of those Heaven-inspir'd Oracles , to teach us literally such Truths as belong to Philosophy ; or to give Reasons for every particular they mention : 'T is Unworthy the Majesty and Authority of the Divine Spirit that Endited them , to instruct us Scientifically ; as if no Credit or Belief were to be given to his Word , signify'd to us by such Authentick Instruments writ by his Immediate Commission 'T is Favour enough that he has been pleas'd to give us some Conclusions , or acquaint us with some Theses of a higher Nature , and to ascertain their Truth by engaging his Infallible Veracity ; and , that by means of our Industrious Study he bestows upon us the Inferiour and more Familiar Light of Scientifical Knowledge , to explicate those Truths , by showing their Agreeableness to Evident Principles of Nature ; which the same GOD of Truth has also taught us , tho' not so immediately ; that so , we may comfort Faith and make it more Lively and Operative in our selves , and others , as also , defend it against Opposers , and confute by Solid Discourses the Fantastick Raillery of Ignorant Unbelievers ; who chuse rather to mistrust their own Natural Notions than assent to any thing that sutes not with their Imagination ; and are ready to renounce the best Productions of their Reason reflecting upon Principles , than to allow any thing to Faith ; tho' the same Reason informs them , by a thousand Instances , that nothing is more Unreasonable than such a restiff humoursomeness . So certain it is , That No Man can be an Adversary to Faith , but he must , withal , be an Enemy to True Science . If any Man complains , he is injur'd by this censure , I 'll candidly tell him how he may clear himself : Let him leave off his Witty Talk and Loose Drollery ; and , laying , first his Principles , draw thence , by Connected Discourses , his Conclusions . This Method will have force upon Humane Nature ; whereas , when Truth is enquir'd after , Raillery satisfies no Man of Sense , nor pleases any but Gigglers . But , alas ! Their weak Cause forbids them any such Manly Procedure . The very Attempting it will convince themselves , if Candid , that 't is impossible and impracticable ; and , make them confess , ( at least by their carriage and ill performance ) that they never follow'd the wise Conduct of True Reason , but were deluded by the Folly of their Imagination . But what Gratitude , what Acknowledgments do we owe to those Blessed Spirits , for their ever-watchful care over us ; for preventing our Heedlesness and want of Foresight from falling into a thousand Mischances ; for keeping us in all our ways , ( Psal. 90. 11. ) For inspiring us with good Thoughts , and pitching their Tents about us , to defend us from the Assaults and Fiery Darts of our Ghostly Enemy ? What Respect ought we to show towards them for the Excellency rf their Nature , and their High Station in the Created Universe ? What Veneration for their Purest Sanctity , and for the Glory they enjoy by being Attendants in GOD's Empyreal Court , and their seeing daily the Unvail'd and Blissful Face of our Father who is Heaven ? Mat. 18. 10. Let us then present them with our humble thanks for their Sollicitons care of us , and their offering up the Incense of our Prayers in their Golden Censor at the Throne of Grace , Rev. 8. 3 , 4 , 5. Our Good GOD , who has commanded us to honour our Father and Mother , and our Magistrates , and to be Grateful to our Benefactors , whom , as Second Causes , he has order'd to be Instrumental to our Good ; will not be offended that we honour his Holy Angels , whom he has appointed to assist us in a more Soveraign manner , both Temporally and Spiritually ; and who have a greater power over the World , and all material Nature than Alexanders or Caesars . Who can reflect upon those words told us by the mouth of our Saviour himself , that the Angels do rejoice at the Repentance of a Sinner , and not admire at such a disinteressed Goodness and Charity towards us poor Mortals ; and love , honour , and thank them for it . Common Morality and Nature enjoyn us these Duties ; and what 's Agreeable to the Laws of Right Nature or Reason can never be opposite to Christianity , which establishes and not dissolves those Laws . Tho' they need not , nor require those Duties at our hands , yet we do nevertheless owe them . Tho' they do neither more or less assist us , whether we apply to them or neglect them ; yet our Obligation is not the less , but rather more for their Love to us , and such a Love as is not at all Selfish . There is not such a Distance between the Church Militant and Triumphant , as to render a Mutual and Spiritual Commerce between them Impracticable . We are all of us Fellow Servants of the same Common Lord , and have the same Head , Christ Jesus . Nor can Distance at all hinder the Communication of Spiritual Natures , which are above the Limited Nature of Quantity . They are truly and in a better manner Present with us while we are in their Thoughts , which is all the Presence of which Spiritual Natures are Capable ; and we are really United Spiritually with them , when we have the same Pious Affections with them . They frequently conversed with Mankind under Visible Apparitions in the time of Moses his Law : And , tho' Better Ordinary Means be now allow'd , and therefore such Extraordinary Favours need not be so Frequent ; yet this is no reason to neglect an Invisible or Spiritual Communication with them : Especially , since it is our Interest and Benefit to caltivate it , by considering their Happy State , their Obedience to the Divine Will , and their Diligent and Charitable Concern for us . They are as Pure in their Morals from Sin , as they are in their Naturals from Matter ; and they purifie and spiritualize our Souls , while our Understandings and Wills are employ'd in thinking on such Holy and Pure Objects . Our Soul takes a Tincture , and a kind of Nature , as it is Moral , from the Objects it affectionately converses with . That Soul which is oft thus thinking of Earthly Things is Earthly ; Of Corporeal Pleasures , is Brutish ; Of Empty Honour , is Aiery and Vain ; Of GOD , is Divine ; and for the same reason , the Soul which thus affectionately applies it's Thoughts and Affections to Angels , or converses with them spiritually , ( cum Sancto Sanctus eris , ) is ANGELICAL . Only , let us be sure we honour them for their Masters sake , and that we do not venerate them so that the Honour done to them , does interfere with that Supreme Honour due by a thousand Titles to their and our Infinitely Perfect GOD and Creatour : To treat of whose Adorable Majesty we consecrate our next Endeavours . Transnatural Philosophy : OR , METAPHYSICKS . BOOK III. Of the most Pure Actuality of Being , the Adorable DEITY . CHAP. I. Of the Existence , Essence ▪ and Attributes of GOD. § . 1. THERE must be Something whose Dem. I. Essence is a most Pure Actuality of Being , without any Potentiality whatever . For , since Names are invented to signifie the Natures of the Things we ●…ceive ; and none of the Names ●f those Beings which we call Creatures , whether they be Angels , Men , or Bodies , ( as Michael , Peter , a Stone , a Tree , &c. ) do imply Actual Being , or Existence , in their Signification : It follows , that they Abstract from and are Indifferent to Existing and Not-existing ; or , are a meer Power or Potentiality to that Act call'd Existence . But , from a meer Power , Potentiality , or Indifferency , nothing can follow , or issue ; much less such a Noble Effect as Actual Being . Wherefore , were there not some Other Thing which has no Potentiality or Indifferency to Existing , but has of it's own Nature Actual Being , neither it Self , nor any other Thing , could ever have been Actually . But we know certainly , that our selves , and many Other Things are ; Therefore , as sure as it is , that any Thing is , and that we know the Meaning of the Words which we intelligently use , and by which we intend to express our Conceptions ; ( which 't is Self-evident we do , since without doing this we could be sure of nothing we say , ) so Certain and Evident it is , that there must be Something whose Nature or Essence it is to have no Potentiality or Indifferency to Being ; and , consequently , which is , of it's self , a most P●r● Actuality of Being . 2. Dem. II. Nothing is more Evident than that Actual Being is not contain'd in the Notion , Nature o● Essence of some of those Beings call'd Creatures ; for we experience that such and such Trees ▪ Animals , &c. sometimes ar● sometimes are not ; whence we can with Truth predicate or say of them , according to the Notion of Thing , and using the same word which signifies the same Individual Thing , ( in respect of those several times ) that they are Existent , or Not-existent ; which we could not do were it their Nature or Essence to be Existent ; for in that case , this Proposition , [ Peter is not-existent , ] would be the same as [ Peter is not Peter , ] which is against an Identical Proposition ▪ and the greatest of Falshoods ; whereas all Mankind grants that these Propositions , [ Such a Man , Animal , or Tree , now are not , ] may be Certain Truths . Hence I ▪ subsume ; But we find no more of Actual Being in the meaning of those words , Gabriel , Michael , or any other Finite Being we can imagine , than there is in these , A Stone , a Tree , B●…cephalus , or any other Thing which we see is Corrupted , and therefore we truly say of it , that it is not : Wherefore not one of those Finite Beings we call Creatures , have Actual Being in their Essence or Nature . Therefore all we can say of them , in order to Being , is , that they can be , or have a Power to be Actually . But that which ●● a meer Power to any Act cannot give it self 〈…〉 Act ; for then Water , which ▪ has a Power ●…e Hot , might make it self Hot ; and every thing in Nature might give ▪ it self whatever ●…al or Accidental Acts the Matter or Power 〈…〉 bear ; that is , every Body in Nature might 〈…〉 it self any thing . Wherefore , since none ●…ose Potential Beings could exist of them●…s , or by virtue of their own Nature or Es●…e ; It follows necessarily , that there must ●…ome Other Being whose Nature and Essence 〈…〉 is to have no Potentiality to Being in it , or ( which is the same ) which is a Pure Actuality of ●…ng . 3. Dem. III. Were there any Thing , whether Body , Man , Angel , or whatever Higher Being we can imagine , that were of it's own Nature only a Potentiality of Being or a Power to Bee , and yet gave it self to be Actually ; it must be conceiv'd , in priority of Reason , as yet not to have that Being which it gave it self : But 't is a flat Contradiction to conceive that what has Not Being , or is not , should act or produce Being in it self . Therefore there must have ever been a Pure Actuality of Being . 4. Dem. IV. This is enforced , because Actual Being is the Noblest Effect that can be imagin'd , and far more Excellent than a Power to bee , as it is contra-distinguisht to Being Actually ; as appears hence , that the Power to any Form is but a kind of Disposition , Order , or ( as it were ) a Means , or Way , to that Form or Act to which 't is a Power ; or rather , the Form , is the End that Disposition was order'd for , and to which that Way led . Whence , in case a Power or Potentiality of Being should give it self Actual Being , it would act beyond the Virtue of such a Power ; that is beyond it's self ; and , therefore , would do what it cannot do ; which is a direct Contradiction . 5. Dem. V. No Cause can produce an Effect contradictory to it's own Nature or Essence : But , if a Power , which is essentially Indeterminate , should give it's self it 's Form or Act which is essentially Determinate , that Cause would work contradictorily to it's Nature ; which would destroy all Causality , and all Order of Natural Operation . Therefore , what is it self but a Power to be , can never make it self be actually . 6. So that from the plain obvious Notions of Power and Act , this Great Conclusion is by a Metaphysical Medium , that is , ab Altissimis Causis , most evidently demonstrated ; that , since from a Potentiality or Power of Being no Actual Being could have been produc'd : Hence , had all Beings been Potential , nothing could ever have been ; and therefore , there must necessarily be some Being whose Nature or Essence is Pure Actuality of Being ! Which as will be shown , is the Notion of the First Being , or the Deity . 7. Hence follows , that this Actuality of Being did Create or give Being to all other things . For , since it has been demonstrated here that none of their Essences has Actual Being in their Natures , but were Potential to that Act call'd Existence ; nor , con●…ntly could give themselves to be actually ; 〈…〉 the very Terms evince , that all Things that a●e ▪ must either have Actual Being in their Natures , or not have Actual Being in their Natures : 〈…〉 follows evidently that they must either have ●…d Actual Being given them ( or have been ●reated ) by that Self-existent Thing , that has Actual Being in it's Nature , or is essentially an Actuality of Being ; or else they must have had Actual Being given them by Nothing . 8. Against this Demonstration for the Existence of some First Being , ( or Beings , ) some may object , That there has been an Infinite Number of Things Antecedent to one another , without any possibility of conceiving a First ; none of which Things were meerly Potential in order to Being , but all of them were actually in their Proper Seasons ; and therefore they might give Actual Being to those Things that still succeeded . To which I Answer . 9. First , That this does not solve the Argument , but objects against the Conclusion ; than which nothing is more Unfair in Discoursing . For this untoward Method allows him who is the Respondent , to prevaricate from his Duty , and turn Opponent : Which confounds those two Offices , and perverts all the Laws of Reasoning or Discoursing . 10. Secondly , which is yet much worse , It opposes the Conclusion by a meer Voluntary Assertion ; neither Demonstrated , nor ( as we peremptorily challenge them ) possible to bear even any show of a Demonstration . Whereas , against a Pretended Demonstration , ( even in case this aukward Method of Discoursing were allowable , as it is not ) nothing under a Pretended Demonstration has right to be alledg'd . Probabilities , in such a case , being Insignificant and Incompetent to be put in the Ballance . 11. Thirdly , That the Argument is not solv'd , 〈…〉 Evident ; for , it manifestly proceeds upon what of it's own Nature , or essentially , is Potential to Being , or Actual Being ; and , ( as is seen , § . 6. 7. ) the Demonstration is , in part , grounded upon the Necessity that one side of the Contradiction must be True. Now , it must be confest by themselves , that ma●y of these Actual Causes , which they pretend ●id all along give Actual Being to others , ( viz. many Bodies ) were not of their own Nature , or Essentially Existent ; for , had they been such essentially , they had not needed , nor could they receive Existence from others , since they had it of themselves , nor could they ever not have been ; ●…e contrary to all which we experience , since we see many of them Generated , and others Corrupted . And , had the Predicate [ Existent ] , been Essential to any of them ; then , since Essential Predicates are always predicated of their Subjects [ Existent ] could always with truth be predicated of Peter or every Individual Entity ; which put , we could never say , with Truth , that Peter , or 〈…〉 other Thing which once was , and is now corrupted , is not Existent , or is not ; which Common Sense , and the very Notion of the word [ was ] or [ Fuit , ] makes it Self-evident we can do . lastly , To clinch the Truth of this Point , 't is an Identical Proposition , and one of the First Truths , that [ Every thing is what it is , or , is it's self . ] Wherefore , in case [ Existent ] were an Essential Predicate of any of those Corruptible or Finite Things ; then , since what 's Essential to any thing does ( at least as a necessary and intrinsecal part ) constitute it , and what wants it's Essence is not that Thing , or is not it's self ; it would be against an Identical Proposition , ( on which the Metaphysical Verity , that is , all the Truth we can imagine depends , ) if those Things which they put to be the Successive Causes of Actual Being should at any time not be ; which yet Experience tells us , do sometime cease to be , or are not . As certain , then , as an Identical Proposition is True ; so Certain it is , that the Natures of all Finite Things are no more but only Capable of Being ; that is , Potential and Indifferent to Being and not-Being ; and , therefore , that they had no Being from any Finite Cause ; but from some Infinite First Cause , ( or Causes , ) which is Essentially Actual Being , or a Pure Actuality of Being . 12. Fourthly , Their Assertion , relying on the Supposition of an Infinite Number of Successive Causes , is utterly overthrown , by proving , that An Infinite Number is absolutely Impossible ; which I thus show out of the Nature of the Subject about which we are Discoursing , [ Number . ] For , all Number , even tho' Infinite , is compounded , made up , or consists of Units or Ones ; So that , as Twenty is Twenty Ones ; and a Million , is a Million of Ones , so an Infinite Number is Infinite Ones ; nor can it ( as it has the Notion of Number ) consist of any thing else . Nor can themselves find any thing in it's Composition but Ones . Regarding then the Subject of our Discourse , this Infinite Collection of Ones , we can find or imagine nothing in it , by which it can be conceiv'd to grow up , or rather become , Infinite , but One still successively following the foregoing Ones . Wherefore it must become formally Infinite by some One added to , or taken with the rest ; there being in it nothing else ( as was said ) imaginable , by which it could formally o● integrally become Infinite : But 't is an absolute Impossibility , that a Number , or Multitude , ( if that word rather please them ) should become Infinite by the Accession of some One ; Therefore an Infinite Number is absolutely Impossible . I do remember , that when I prest this Argument against a very Ingenious Atheist ; he , to shift it o● , reply'd , that no Man has or can have any Notion of an Infinite Number . I answer'd , That th●● condemns themselves , for recurring to such a Position that no Man can tell what the Words ●… . I added , That this was a strong Argument against them , that the Position it self was Chimerical ; and convinces them of being baffled in their Cause , by their running to such a Thesis as was confessedly Unintelligible either by themselves or their Adversary . Next , I assur'd him , That , waving this , we could very easily have a Notion or Simple Apprehension of what the word [ Infinite ] means , ( as is clearly shown , Solid Philosophy Asserted , Reflexion IX . ) Otherwise we could not Speak or Discourse of it either pro or con . But when we come to joyn it in a Proposition with Existent , and say , [ An Infinite Number is , ●t has been ; ] then , indeed , our Understanding i● puzzled , and at an utter loss to make Sense of it ; and no wonder , since it implies a Contradiction ; which , being against the Nature of Ens , i● altogether Unintelligible . His next Answer , was , That my Argument proceeded upon a False Supposition : For , there could be no Agent to Calculate it ; or add one to one , till it became Infinite , I reply'd , Those very Agents himself puts to have produced still a New One all along , did add those Successive Ones in re , tho' no Man's Arithmetick comprehended them all by Summing up their Total in his Understanding . Besides , this drops the whole Question , and flies off to a New Point . For the Question is not , whether an Agent or Calculator can do this ; but , whether the Nature of the Subject ▪ [ viz. An Infinite Number , which is made up of nothing but Ones , ] does not bear it , nay force it , that it must become Infinite by One added to One ; and therefore , by the Accession of s●●● One to the Finite Number presuppos'd . To which Essential or Intrinsical Nature of the Thing , or Subject , ( from which only we argue ) the want of an Agent is Accidental and Extrinsical . Thus Philosophers hold there is some least si●● of Bodies or Minima Naturalia , which are to farther Divisible Actually , because there is no Agent little enough to come between the sides of it and divide it farther ; and yet the same Men hold , that , since Quantitas est Divisibilis , i● semper Divisibilia , it is , notwithstanding , of It 's own Nature , farther Divisible . 13. Fifthly , To beat them from this Evasion , that there wants an Agent , let us see what the Necessity of not admitting a plain Contradiction will work with them . I argue then , thus ; Those Infinite ▪ Agents which they say do , and eve● did communicate Actual Being to the following Ones , must ( since this was done by way 〈…〉 Motion , ) require Infinite Time to perform this 〈…〉 But such an Infinite Antecedent Time is absolutely impossible to have been ; Therefore their ●…n Position falls to the ground . To prove , 〈…〉 there could not have been an Infinite Time , ●…gue thus by way of Dilemma , which is a 〈…〉 Conclusive Method , when the two sides of ●…e Contradictory , and can have no Third , or ●…dle between them . If there has been an Infi●… Time , there must have been either an Infinite Number of Hours antecedently , or not ▪ an-Infinite Number of Hours , but a Finite Number of them ●… . If only a Finite Number , then that whole ●…e was Finite , and therefore had a Beginning , ●…ould have been ever . If , they say , an Infi●… Number of Hours have anteceded , or ( lest ●…ey should quarrel with the word Number , ) an ●…ite Multitude of them , or , ( which is the same 〈…〉 the Subjects part , ) a Motion correspondent to 〈…〉 Infinite Multitude of Hours ; then , in this Multitude of antecedent Hours , Either there has ●…en some One Hour distant from This Hour which ●…s now , by Infinite Ones ; Or no one Hour di●…nt from this present Hour by Infinite ones . Let them take which side they please , for one of them they must take or allow , they being Con●●●dictories . If they say , there has been no one Hour distant from this Present Hour by Infinite ●…s , then , since in this Infinite Multitude of ●…ours there is nothing but Ones , for ( Multa ●…ans multa una , and can mean nothing else ) 〈…〉 the whole Collection of Hours which they pretend to be Infinite is clearly Finite , there being nothing in it which is Infinitely distant . Again , If None of them be distant from this Present Hour by Infinite ones , then All of them are distant by Finite ones ; and so , again , the Collection of antecedent Hours must have been Finite . And , if they chuse to take the other side , and say , There has been some One hour which is distant from this Present by Infinite ones , then they manifestly put an Infinite Time , or a Time which has No End , and yet has Two Ends ; viz. That One Hour terminating it long ago , and this Present Hour terminating it Now : That is , they put an Infinite which is Finite , or not-Infinite , which is a Direct Contradiction . 14. Lastly , To confute this Infinity , whether of antecedent Causes or of Parts of Time , there needs no more but to reflect upon the plain Meaning of the word [ Infinite ▪ ] and it will tell us , that an Infinite in any kind must include All that belongs to that kind ; so that there can be nothing of that kind out of it , nor any Accession to it , or New Particulars of that Kind which it does not comprehend . For , if the supposed Infinity did not include them All , it fell , so far , Short ; and any Shortness is directly Opposite to the Notion of Infinity . Nothing being more Evident than that the words [ Not-all , ] do signifie the same as [ only some , ] and therefore , that Notion , in whatever Kind , that does not extend it self to All of that Kind , is Limited to some , and therefore is not-Infinite in that Kind : Since then we see New Hours daily accrue to Antecedent Time , and New Agents added to the former ▪ ●●● of Causes , which can , with no Sense , be 〈…〉 to be comprehended in the Antecedent Collection of them ; 't is manifestly against our common Notions , and Common Sense , to pre●… that the multitude of Antecedent Causes , and ●●●ts of Time ( or Motion ) have been actually Infinite . Wherefore , all these Antecedent Causes ●●d some First , or a Beginning of their Being , which they could not have had of themselves , had their Natures been only Potential to Being , or meerly capable to be . Therefore , there must ●●ve ever been something , or some First Cause , which of it's own Nature or Essence , is an Actually of Being . That there can be but One such ●…entially Actual Being , ( tho' it may be ga●●●●ed even hence ) will be more exactly prov'd ●●●●after . ●● ▪ Nothing can be weaker than to alledge , th●● there was only a Finite Number of Causes which gave Being circularly to one another . For , this would make each of them only Potential to Being , in ●●ard they receiv'd it from others ; ●●● yet at the same time Actually ●●●●g , because they communica●●● it to another : Nay , to give Being to themselves : For , if B is because A is ; and C is , because B is ; and A is because C is , it will fol●… that A is because A is . That Maxim , [ Causa C●●sae est Causa Causati , ] what restriction soever it may have in other Cases , has here it's full fo●●e ; because the Cause . does here give the 〈…〉 and adequate Effect to it's self ; the Noti●… Existence ( the Act which is given ) being every way Indivisible ; and , therefore , All of ●● must be given , or not at all . I have been more large in refuting this Pre●ence of an Endless or Infinite antecedent Succession of Motion and Natural Causes , it being the chief Asylum of the Atheists . We return now to our Arguments . 16. Lemma I. The Notion we have of Ens or Thing is Different from the Notion of Existence . This has been demonstrated , B. 1. Ch. 1. § . 3. where it is shown , That the Notion of Essence , which constitutes every Finite Ens , consists in a Potentiality or a meer Possibility , of Existing ; whereas Existence is the Act that answers to that Power , and so is vastly distinguish● or Different from it ; the Power , and it 's Proper Act being counterpos'd to one another . Add , That this has also been demonstrated here , § . 2. 17. Lemma II. We cannot think or speak of the First Being , tho' suppos'd Infinite , but by making use of such Natural Notions and Words as we have . This is Self-evident ; since none can think or speak with Thoughts or Words which he has not . 18. Lemma III. Amongst all our Natural Notions , that of [ Existence ] is mo●● Actual ; and being Pure from all Potentiality in the Line of Being , it is deservedly call'd an Actuality , or the very Formal and Whole , and Sole Nature of Act , in that Line . This has ●… Demonstrated , B. 1. Ch. 1 : § . 34 , 35. ●o 〈…〉 the Reader is referred . ●… . Of all our Natural Notions ( that ●… ) that of Existence is the ●…perest and Best we can use 〈…〉 we speak of a Pure Actu●…y of Being , or a DEITY . This ●…prov'd § . 16 , 17. and is Evident ●●●m the Terms . For since Ens 〈…〉 who le Latitude abstracts 〈…〉 Corporeal Nature , which has that Power call'd ●… ; and is clearly Antecedent to the Third 〈…〉 of Power , since a Capacity of being it self , ●●● antecede a Capacity of Sustaining or giving 〈…〉 to Accidents ; and therefore , the Poten●… which Ens has to it's Act is more Noble , 〈…〉 Exalted , and more defaecated ( as it were ) 〈…〉 those baser and narrower sorts of Power than a●y other : Wherefore , since Existence is the Ultimate Act of Ens in it's whole Latitude ; it ●ollows , that it is the most Abstracted or Purest sort ●● Act in the Line of Being ; and , therefore , is ●…incident with the Notion of Pure Actuality of ●… , which is the best Positive Notion we can 〈…〉 of a DEITY . And , accordingly , the True , ●… ▪ ( as will be demonstrated shortly ) the ONLY ●OD , Himself , who could best express to us 〈…〉 ow● Divine Essence , when Moses , ( Exod. 3. ●… ) desir'd to know by what Name ( which sig●… his Essence ) he should call him , when he ●●ould come to speak from Him to the Children of Israel , answer'd him , Ego sum qui sum , I am who AM , or I am He who IS ; and bid him tell t●●m that He who IS has sent me unto you : Which ●…inly signifies , that all Other Things have only a Potentiality or Possibility of Existing or Being Actually ; and that 't is Proper and Peculiar to GOD's Nature or Essence ( which the Name is to express ) to Be Actually or Exist : And that if any Thing else has Being or Exists , it partakes or borrows it's Being from Him who only ●● ▪ or whose Essence is that Pure Actuality of Being call'd Existence . So that the main Ground of our Metaphysicks , particularly that which discourses of the Adorable DEITY , is , in the main , the same Sense , given to our hands by GOD Himself ; which we dilate , and on which we descant by our Reason . 20. Lemma IV : Every Abstract Word , which signifies meerly any Form or Act , includes in it's Notion the whole Nature of the Act imported by that Word , without any Limitation . For , let us take Knowledge , Virtue , Whiteness , or any other such Abstract Word , we shall find that none of them either Express , Hint , or Connotate [ thus much , or such a Portion or Degree of those Acts. ] Wherefore , those Abstract Words involve in them the Whole Nature of those Acts , that is , without Limitation . Moreover , were there ( per impossibile ) suppos'd Infinite things which had Knowledge , Virtue , or Whiteness in them , they would all partake of the Nature of those Acts , and yet it would not be exhausted ; which shows the word signifies those Acts without Limitation . 21. Lemma V. Therefore the Limitation of all Acts must either proceed from the Subject it affects , which being a Particular or Determinate Ens , makes it This and no Other ; or else from the Causes which determin'd the Act to such or such a Degree of it . Hence I Argue . 22. Therefore GOD's Existence , which is his Essence , is Unlimited , and Actually Infinite . For , since his Existence includes the whole Nature of Existence by Lem. IV. nor is it , as it is found in Him , an Act corresponding to a Potential Essence , as it is in Creatures ; this being against the Nature of a Pure Actuality ; but is His Proper Name which imports his Essence ; neither is his Existence limited by any Subject , in regard every Subject is a Power to receive advening Acts , which is against the Nature of that Essence which is purely Actual : Hence it follows , that it is it 's own Subject , or Self-subsistent . Nor , Lastly , can ● be Limited by the Operation of any Cause which gave him that Act : He being the First Cause ; and , incapable to receive anything , in regard this implies Passiveness and Potentiality : It ●ollows then , that his Existence is absolutely Unlimi●ed , and ( it being a Pure Actuality ) actually Infinite . 13. Therefore the DEITY is but ONE . For , ●ere there Two Infinite Existences , ●ach of them must necessarily ●●ve something ▪ which the other ●● not ; otherwise , they would ●re nothing to distinguish them or make them more , they being in all respects the Same . Therefore if there were two GODs , this would limit both of them , and make neither of them to be Infinite ; therefore there can be but One Infinite Existence , or One GOD. Again , were there Two Self-Existences , they would agree in that Common Notion ; and the Differences that constitute them within that Notion must be more and less of that Common Notion , [ Infinite Existence , ] as has been often prov'd : Which is perfect Nonsense ; Infinity being beyond all Degrees , and Incapable of them . Besides , Differences are necessarily more Actual than the Common Notion they divide ; but no Notion can be more Actual than Existence , much less than Self-existence , which is a Pure Actulity ; therefore , since Self-Existence can admit no Differences to divide it , 't is impossible it should be more than One. To proceed : 24. Corol. I. Hence nothing could be so extravagantly Foolish and void of Common Sense , as the Polytheism of the Antient Heathens : For , by making more Gods , they did by consequence , make them all to be Finite ; and , therefore none of their Essences to be Actual Being , but Potential in order to Existence . Whence , since they could not ( having no more of their own Natures , but only a Power to Bee , ) give Actual Being to themselves , they must either have it from Another whose Essence is Existence , and therefore i● Infinite , and One ; or they could not bee ●● all , but be ( as they really were ) meer Chimera's : And hence it came , that they ma●● all the Attributes of their imaginary Gods to be Limited and Imperfect ; they represented them as subject to Squabbles among themselves , and liable to a thousand Natural and Moral Defects : Which obliged the Wiser sort amongst them , asham'd of their Nonsensical and Foppish Superstition , that they might in some measure keep up the Repute of their pretended Religion , have recourse to our Tenet of One Soveraign Being ; and to alledge , that they meant no more by the rabble of their other Gods , but that they were so many Attributes , or several Considerations of GOD's Divine Providence , overseeing such and such Parts of the World , or performing such or such Operations . Nor were there Many of them , who were Firm in their holding a First Being ; nor any of them Clear in their apprehension of his Nature ; and none of them who placed their Eternal Felicity in seeing his Divine Essence ; nor held this was Attainable by them after this Life ; nor , who erected their Thoughts to the Hope of enjoying that Blissful Sight ; for want of which Hope , they could not raise their Affection to Him above all things , which we have shown , Book 2. Ch. 1. § . 17. § . 19. is the only Disposition which could bring them to the True End of their Nature , Eternal Happiness . Not to speak of those besotted Heathens , who made Gods of Senseless Creatures , tho' Inferiour to themselves , and despicable even to Ridiculousness . 25. Coroll . II. Hence the Deists , if they be not as much besotted as those very Heathens themselves , cannot but acknowledge and admire the Wisdom of the Heavenly Doctrine taught us by our Divine Master Iesus Christ , which by Calm Reason , Good Life , joyn'd with Astonishing Miracles , without any External Force , has chaced and banisht out of the World this Epidemical Phrenzy , which had possessed all Mankind , but the small Nation of the Iews ; and will make them see withall how Necessary Divine Revelation was ; since Human Wit and Learning , which was , amongst many of those Heathens , at the height , could neither enable them to rectifie themselves , nor make them capable of attaining their Summum Bonum ; nor cure Mankind of that Universal Dotage of Polytheism ; nor uphold it self against the Light which Christianity brought into the World ; but that , whereever it dawn'd , the shades of Errour concerning the True Deity immediately vanisht and disappear'd . Certainly , whoever considers what a prodigious Change , concerning the Worship of the True GOD , Christianity has wrought in a vast part of the World , and is still spreading it self ; and by what Methods it has prevail'd to the utter Extirpation of Idolatry , must be wilfully blind if he does not clearly see , that Digitus Dei est hic , and that it's Doctrine is truly Divine . 26. Lem. VI. Existence is the whole Perfection of every Thing that Exists . For , ●nce whatever is in any thing besides Existence , ( which is the L●st Actuality in the Line of Being ) must be Potential in respect of it . Again , since whatever is Actually ( a forti●ri ) can be , otherwise it would be a Contradiction a Thing can be while it is ; whereas , 't is a First Principle , that A Thing cannot but be while ●● is ; It follows evidently , that when a Power of Being , or ( which is the same ) an Ens , is Actuated , nothing is lost of it but the Privation of Act which Power seems to imply ; but , all that is Positive in it , ( or is that we call Ratio Entis ) 〈◊〉 remains under a better state ; whence , Power , is Eminently included in Existence ; and , as it were , swallow'd up in it , as in a Greater or Higher Perfection in ▪ the Line of Being , which involves in it the Lesser or Lower . 27. Lem. VII . Much more an Existence , which is also the Essence of the Thing , and ●● most Actual and withal Infinite , includes in it Actually and For●ally , all the Perfections that can be conceiv'd to belong to Ens in it's whole Latitude . This is Evident , since 〈◊〉 comprehends in it all that can belong to 〈◊〉 , which constitutes Ens in it's largest signification . 28. Wherefore the Divine Essence , or the DEITY , ●●cludes in it all Perfections ima●●nable which can any way belong to Ens , and this Infinitely ; ●●d , therefore , is Infinitely-perfect . For , since we call that Perfect in any Kind , to which nothing is wanting , or which has All in it that can be imagin'd in that kind : It follows , that the Divine Essence , which comprizes in it all the Perfections that can belong to Ens in it's largest Sense , and all that can belong to Existence in an Unlimited Signification , is infinitely Perfect in All reg●…s that can belong to Ens , or which have E●●●●● in them . 2● Therefore GOD is Infinitely Perfect in all Intellectual and Moral Attributes ; that is , He is infinitely Knowing , Wise , Good , Merciful , Powerful , Veracious , Free , &c. and this in the most perfect manner , as becomes a Pure Actuality of Being ; since all these have something of Perfection in their Notion . 30. Therefore , he is of a Spiritual Nature ; as being not only a Pure Act , as other Spirits are , but a Pure Actuality of Being ; which infinitely exceeds their Nature , which was Potential in respect of Existence . 31. Therefore , for the same reason he is not Corporeal . For this includes both the First , Second , and Third sort of Potentiality mention'd at the beginning ; each of which is diametrically Opposite to the Nature of Pure Actuality . 32. Therefore , 't is a strange degrading of the Divine Nature to apply to GOD any Corporeal Attributes ; such as are Place , Space , Motion , &c. which are quite Opposite to an Incorporeal Being . 33. Therefore , the Divine Essence is also Immutable . For , this implies a Potentiality , or Power to be Chang'd , which is inconsistent with a Pure Actuality . 34. Therefore GOD is also a Self-Subsistent Being . For , since his Essence is Actual Being , and withall , Infinite in Being , ( which compre●ends the whole Nature of Be●●g ; ) that which supports it in Being must have no Being . 35. Therefore the Divine Essence must be also most Simple or Uncompounded . For , it can have no Logical Composition of Genus and Difference ; because the Genus is essentially that which has more of it 's Kind under it ; and , there cannot be more , where ( as is demonstrated , § . 23. ) there is but One. Nor can it admit any Difference ; for ●tis the Essence of the Difference to make One Thing differ from Another ; and , in our case , there can be no Other , where there is but One. Nor can there be in GOD that Logical Composition of Accidents , with their Subject ; For , the Subject is Potential in respect of the Accidents , or Modes , which affect or actuate it . Nor can there be in GOD Physical Composition of the Second sort of Power with it's Act , call'd Matter and Form ; because he is Incorporeal , and Pure Actuality . Nor can this Pure Actuality of Being , call'd Self-Existence , be compounded Metaphysically ; for even our low Created Existence is Indivisible , and can have no Metaphysical Parts ; and , therefore , can have no Metaphysical Divisibility or Composition in it . Wherefore , all the Distinction of GOD's Essential Attributes does spring wholly from the Shortness and Imperfection of our Understanding , which is not able to reach or fathom the Whole Extent of his every-way-Infinitely-Perfect Essence , but is forc'd to conceive them by diverse Acts of ours . 36. Wherefore GOD's Duration has nothing in it of Preterit and Future , but is one Present Indivisible on his part , and therefore He is ETERNAL . For , since it is the highest of Impossibility that Self-existence should not exist ; his Essence equally includes , nay speaks or formally signifies and expresses , to have been formerly , and to be futurely , as it does to be now . Wherefore , since 't is not possible to imagine any Instant in which GOD has not his whole Essence , and this ( as far as is on his part ) Indivisibly ; it follows , that in every Instant , ( only which is Present in our Time ) he has his to-have-been , and tobe-hereafter , as much as he has to be-at-present ; But this kind of ever-present , ever-standing and unchangeably-Steady Duration , includes in it self all the Differences of our Time , ( as was now prov'd ) and therefore oomprehends all Time , ( even tho' it were Infinite ) Indivisibly , or without Succession of any thing in GOD , that is , it is one E●er-permanent , Present , Now : Wherefore , since this manner of Enduring is infinitely above that of our ●●●e , which is part after part , Fleeting , and Divisible ; and we call that sort of Duration which infinitely exceeds our Time , [ Eternity , ] and GOD has this Duration ; it follows evidently , that GOD is ETERNAL . 37. Coroll . III. Wherefore 't is highly Derogatory from GOD's Attribute of Eternity . to make it consist in a kind of Correspondency to our Time ; For this puts his Duration , which is Essential to Him , to have Parts , or a Capacity to be Longer or Shorter . Whereas , we ought to reflect , that there can be no possible Proportion between Being and Moving , ( especially a Being so Actual and Permanent as is the Divine Existenee ; ) the one being essentially Divisible , the other essentially , and in every regard , indivisible . All Comparison , and consequently Proportion , can only be conceiv'd between those things which are of the same Kind , or have the same Common Notion : Whereas Being and Moving , do diffet toto Genere ; the one , being the last Formality in the Line of Ens ; the other only an Accident , or Modus Entis ; and are fo far from being of the same Kind , or More and Less of it , and therefore capable of bearing any Proportion to one another ; that , the one ( as was said ) being most Divisible , the other most Indivisible , they are Contradictories ; that is , beyond all Degrees ( only which ground Proportion ) Opposite to one another . 38. Hence also GOD's Essence is IMMENSE , or beyond all possibility of being Measurable . Which Attribute consists in this , that His Unlimited and Indivisible Existence comprizes or resumes in it's self ( and this after an Indivisible manner , or in a Way beyond the the Nature of Quantity ) the whole Nature of Bodily Extension and Space , even tho' it were suppos'd Infinite ; as his Duration , which is the same Indivisible Existence , comprehends all Corporeal Motion or Time , even tho' Time were Infinite . Again , as Angels are no otherwise in Place but by Operating on Bodies , which are in Place ; so GOD is no otherwise in his Creatures ( at least Immediately ) but by Giving and Conserving them in Being , which is his peculiar and immediate Operation , and every way Indivisible . Whence GOD , being in each of his Creatures , and in the very least of them , and this wholly and Indivisibly , by giving them this Soveraign Indivisible Effect , Being ; and , of his own Nature , able to communicate Being to them , even in case they could be suppos'd to be Infinite ; is neither as in Himself , nor as in them ▪ after a Divisible , Quantitative , Extended , Coextended , or Measurable manner ; and therefore He is absolutely IMMENSE , or beyond all Possibility of being subject to be measur'd . 39. Whence , 't is no less Derogatory from GOD's Attribute of IMMENSITY to explicate it so as to consist in a kind of Commensuration to an Infinite Incom●●bensible Inanc ; for this makes GOD's Essence Diffus'd , and con●●quently of a Quantitative Nature ; which makes acute Readers apt to suspect that 't is meant to be no better than a more sub●●le sort of Body ; or , at least , some Act or Form of a Body ; and therefore , but a Compart with it . Fancy is but a Bad Adviser , even in Ordinary Points of Philosophy ; but incredibly worse , when we are to explicase his Nature and Essential Attributes , whose Essence is Self-Existence and most Pure Actuality of Being . Existence ( even amongst us ) abstracts from all Motion , Time , Quantity , and all other Considerations belonging to Corporeal , and even Spiritual Natures ; and being Indivisible , and signifying meer Actuality of Being , is Inexplicable by any of them ; much less GOD's Existence , which is infinitely above Ours . We will close this Discourse concerning GOD's Attributes , by adding one more , which I have not observ'd to have been mention'd by Meta●hysicians , or Divines either . 40. From what 's deduced above , 't is Demonstrated , That the Divine Essence is Infinitely Intelligible , or ( of it 's own Nature ) Easie to be known or seen . For , since we experience , that the Unknowableness or Obscurity of any Object , springs from the Nature of Potentiality , or some kind of Power in it ; which , it being Indeterminate , breeds Confusion ; and all the Distinct and Clear Knowableness it has , arises from it's Act ; which , by Determining the Power , renders that Object Distinct from all others , and therefore Clearly Perceptible or Intelligible : It follows , that since the Divine Nature is infinitely more Actual than any thing found in Creatures , it being a most Pure Actuality ; and it 's Essence being Existence it self , ( the Notion of which is so Self-evident to all Mankind , that 't is impossible to be Defin'd or made Clearer by any Explication imaginable , ) it must necessarily be , of it 's own Nature , Infinitely Intelligible , or most capable to be seen or known , even by the rudest Understanding of the Silliest Soul when Separate ; whose Will , when it leaves this World , is duly Dispos'd for it . 41. Coroll . IV. This last Thesis will to a great Degree comfort the Theological Virtue of HOPE , which is to Erect our Souls to Heaven . For ; doubtless , some Virtuous Humble Souls , when they come to consider and seriously reflect on the Sublime and Infinitely Glorious Majesty of our Great GOD , who , in altis habitat & humilia respicit in Coelo & in Terrâ ; in comparison of whose Exalted Height , all the whole World , nay all the Greatest Angels and Purest Saints in Heaven are as nothing ; may be apt to admit the Temptation of some Despondency , and fear that 't is above the Capacity of any Created Intellect , ever to behold his dazlingly ▪ Bright Essence . Nay , even some Great Divines seem to have had the same Apprehensions , when they invented a Quality call'd Lumen Gloriae , to dispose and Elevate the Eye of the Mind , and fit it for the Beatifical Vision ; by which , ( Glory being the Sight of GOD , and the End , or Summum Bonum of our Nature , ) they make the Light of Glory , which is the End , the Means to it self ; and withal to no purpose . GOD has made our Soul Intellective , and capable to see Infinite Truth , that is , Himself ; and Sanctifying Grace , or the Love of GOD above all things , has already elevated that Natural Faculty above what meer Nature could have rais'd it to , and GOD's Essence is Infinitely Intelligible ; And can any Power and Object be more fitted to one another ? Can there be any difficulty that Essential Truth , which is so luminously and radiantly Bright and Clear , should be seen by a Power which was made to see Truth ? But most especially , when an over-powering and ardent Affection and Love of it , has directed , apply'd and addicted the Eye of the Soul to behold that Object . Let not then such an Irrational Sollicitude trouble any pious Soul : 'T is unworthy Infinite Goodness to be backwards to communicate Himself to his Creatures , when they are thus fitly dispos'd to receive his ever-ready Influence : Let our only Care be to purifie our Intellectual Eye , and purge our Soul from hankering Affections after Unworthy Objects ; which draw our squinting Sight awry , and dim and darken it . This once secur'd , nothing is more Evident than that GOD will not hide his Blissful Face from us one moment , when we are arriv'd into the Region of Light. Nor is there any other Eye-bright requisite for the Beatifical Vision , but this Purity of Heart ; if we may believe the Promise of our Good Saviour ▪ Beati mundi corde quoniam ipsi Deum videbunt ▪ Blessed are the pure in heart , for they shall see GOD , Mat. 5. 42. Innumerable are the Demonstrations which may be brought from divers Sciences , to prove the Existence of a DEITY , and most of the Divine Attributes ; on which I do not here insist , or mention them . 'T is a Subject Copious enough to fill whole Volumes ; Nor is any Scientifical Conclusion in all Nature half so Evident , or voucht by so many Pregnant and Unanswerable Arguments : Against which the Atheist ( as far as I have observ'd ) offers not to alledge any one Demonstration ; but only raises Difficulties and Objections , not from Connected Reason , but Roving Fancy : Yet I judg'd it sufficient for me here , ( that I might keep within the Bounds of my own Province ) to produce only such Metaphysical Mediums as follow out of the forelaid Doctrine : For , besides , that such Arguments as are fetcht from the most Common , and therefore most Evident , Notions , ( which we use to call Altissimae Causae , ) are more Cogent to gain Assent ; a Few Proofs , nay any one Demonstration , such Proofs being evidently Conclusive , is as Convictive as Thousands ; especially , if it be pursu'd to First Principles , and maintain'd against the Objections and Evasions of the adverse Party , by showing their Vanity and Insignificancy . That those I have brought here are such , and thus maintain'd , I shall not be afraid to affirm ; nor civilly to challenge the Atheists to show they are Inconclusive or Defective . 43. From the former Doctrine , assisted by ●…ght Logick , 't is Demonstrable , 〈…〉 no Notion , nor , consequent●… , Word we have , can be Uni●…cably spoken of GOD , as He is 〈…〉 Himself , and of Creatures . For , ●…ce all Distinct Notions which constitute any Nature This , and , consequently , all such Denomination , come from the Form , or the Act ; it would follow , that some such Act is Univocally Common to God and Creatures ; which has been ●●own to be most absurd ; the former being the Highest and Purest Actuality of Being , or Self-Existence ; the later having no Existence at all in it's Nature or Notion . Again , were there any such Notion Common to GOD and Creatures , that Common Notion would be restrain'd by it's Proper Difference to particularize or constitute the DEITY ; which puts in GOD the Composition of Genus and Difference ; and , withall , some Potentiality , which is essentially annext to every Gene●●cal or Common Notion . Wherefore no Notion or Word we have can be Univocally predicated of GOD and Creatures . 44. Wherefore all the Notions we have of GOD , and the Words we use when we speak of Him , are Metaphorical : For , since no word spoken of GOD and Creatures are Univocal , or spoken in the same Sense , they , must , when said of Him and them , be meant in different Senses . ▪ Wherefore , since , when spoken of Creatures , they express our Natural Notions which we had from the Creatures themselves , and therefore are Proper ; it follows , that the Sense they are taken in , when they are transferr'd thence to GOD , is in some sort Improper or Metaphorical . 45. This is farther confirm'd , Because GOD , consider'd as in Himself , is a Pure Actuality of Being , eminently including in it self the whole Plenitude of Ens ; and , consequently , the Objects of All our Notions , and Infinitely more ; whereas we have no Word that signifies more than some one Notion . Again , since the word [ Existence , ] which of all our Natural Notions seems most Proper , does signifie only such a Formality or Act ; but does not signifie that that Act subsists , much less , that it is Self-subsistent , as GOD is ; it cannot properly signifie GOD , who is a Self-subsistent Existence . 46. Hence the Names of our Best Virtues are Metaphorically said of GOD. For , were they Properly said of GOD , there would be some Notion Univocal to GOD and Creatures , contrary to what was prov'd , §§ . 43. 44. Besides , we had the Notions of those Virtues first from Creatures ; therefore , the First Signification of those Words which express them , was what we observ'd in Them ; and we transferr'd them to GOD , because He produces such like Effects as we had remark'd those Men did who were endow'd with those Virtues . 47. Hence follows also , that GOD , as in Himself , is not without some Impropriety denominated , Omnipotent , ●●●-knowing , &c. because Power , and Knowledge , which are included in those Words , are with some Impropriety spoken of God , and not Properly and Univocally . And , tho' Creatour , Lord , and such like are thought by some to be Extrinsecal Denominations ; and therefore , refund no Imperfection upon GOD , if spoken of Him ; yet , ●…s not so : for Relations are Intrinsecal Denominations ; and , as us'd amongst us , ( which gives them their First Signification ) they signifie either ●…ty of Nature , or some Coordination in Acting or Suffering , ( as is shown at large , Method to Sci●… , B. I. Less● 7. ) and it cannot agree to GOD to have any Order to his Creatures , or Coordination with them , as is shown there , § . 12. 48. Lastly , Negative Notions , such as are Immense , Infinite , Immaterial , and ●●n like , seem to have the fairest ●…le to be properly said of GOD ; in regard they distinguish Him from all other Beings , or from 〈…〉 Creatures . But , neither are these Notions 〈…〉 from all Impropriety ; for we use these words as Differences , to distinguish the several sorts of Things ; which implies , there is some Generical Notion , common to both Sorts , which is thus Divided or Distinguisht by those Differences , ●●g ▪ when we say Creatures are Finite , and GOD 〈…〉 Infinite , these Differencing Notions do suppose there is some Univocal Notion Common to both , which is thus Distinguisht or Differenc'd . But this puts in GOD's Essence a Composition of Genus and Difference ; and ( the Generical Notion being Essentially Potential in respect of it's Differences , and they Actual in respect of it , ) is utterly against the Nature of Pure Actuality of Being , which is GOD's Essence . Therefore , neither are these Words or Notions of ours , with due Propriety to be attributed to GOD , as He is in Himself . 49. Moreover , from our former Principles it follows , that there can no Priority or Posteriority , either Rei or Rationis be put in GOD ; much less any such Respects as have the least show of inducing the want of any thing belonging to Being for one Instant or Signum , as some call it : For , this is altogether Repugnant to the Notion of Purest Actuality of Being , or the Godhead . Nor yet of Formal or Virtual Distinction in his Essence ; for this is against GOD's Perfect Simplicity ; and withal implies some Negation , which is an Imperfection . Nor is either of these Positions against the Mystery of the B. Trinity rightly explain'd ; where the Notion of Origin , Principiation , Pr●cession , &c. do debar both these Priorities , and imply , nay , necessitate , perfect ▪ Simultaneousness . Much less can any such Words be attributed to GOD , as savour , in the least of the Notions of any thing in Him which is Cause or Effect : Nor , lastly , which is next akin to it , which induces the Dependence of GOD's Knowledge , or of the Decrees of his Will , on Creatures , whether Existent or Possible . Which ●● unworthy the All-ordering Providence of the First Cause , which prevents all such Considerations . 50. Notwithstanding what 's said , all the Metaphorical Words mention'd , §§ . 44 , 45. nay all those which frequently occurr in Holy Writ , and are designedly made use of there in Accommodation ●o the Rude Understandings of the Vulgar , are True , and Truly said of GOD , tho' they have some , and ●ivers of them a Great Degree of Impropriety in them . For , since we know , that GOD is Infi●●tely above the Rank of his Creatures , and that they are as Nothing in comparison of His Sublime ●ssence , which is in every regard most Perfect ; s●ch Users of those Words do intend ▪ while they ●●e them , to depure and strip them of whatever is ●●perfect in their Signification ; and do only ●●●an to apply them to GOD , as far as they sure ●●me Notion of ours which by Analogy , has ●●●e Perfection Resembling what 's in Him. For ●xample : In regard we call such Persons Wise , ●●●● , Good , Merciful , &c. from whom we have ●●serv'd such Effects proceed as are Proper to ●●ese Virtues ; therefore , holding ( as we do ) ●●●t the same Effects proceed from GOD , we do ●● this reason denominate Him , or apply such attributes to Him as we gave to such Virtuous Persons : And therefore those Propositions are most True , because he does , indeed , and that with an incomparably more Excellent manner , produce the same Effects ; which was the Reason of our transferring those Notions to Him. Yet , all the while we abstracted from the manner how those Virtues are in GOD ; in regard this being utterly Unknown to us , could not enter into our Intention when we thus Transferr'd them ; our Intention or Meaning , and our Notion being the same thing . Again , since , when our Saviour is call'd a Lamb or a Lion , ( which , being taken from Animals , are some of the Worst and more Ignoble sort of Metaphors ) by reason of his Meekness and Courage , these Spiritual Qualities are the only Consideration we intend or mean when we apply those words to Him ; and therefore those Propositions are exactly True , because our Meaning or Notion signify'd by those Words was only such : Much more is he truly ●aid to be Good , Iust , Wise , &c. Which are by far less Metaphorical , and less Unlike Him than are the other . 51. To clear this Point more fully , and withal to show , that Mystical Theology ( which some apprehend to be nothing but E●statick Fancy ) proceeds upon Solid Grounds , viz. Metaphysicks , assisted by Logick , I Discourse thus . Let us take two Perfections , which some conceive to be Formally in GOD , viz. Mercy and Iustice. Reflecting upon the Meaning of those two Words , we shall find that we have two Forms or Acts in our Mind , whereof one is not the other ; for a Man may be Iust and not Merciful , or Merciful and not Iust. If then these two Forms , thus Distinct be in GOD , then we must put Formal Distinction in GOD , which is Repugnant to the Perfect Simplicity of a Pure and Indivisible Actuality . Besides , by reason of the Formal Distinction of those two Notions as they are conceiv'd by us , we are debarr'd from saying , that One of them is the Other , or that Mercy is Iustice ; whereas , regarding them as they are in GOD , we not only may , but must say , his Mercy is his Iustice ; because there is but one most Simple Formality in GOD , which gives Him the Denomination of Merciful and Iust. 'T is plain then , that these two Virtues cannot be in GOD , as they are thus formally Distinct , or Two , as our Notions represent them ; nor , consequently , at all , unless they be compriz'd in some Formality which eminently contains them both , and may be said to be Formally in GOD. Casting then our Thoughts about , we find in GOD another Attribute , call'd Goodness , which includes ●ustice and Mercy both ; for a Good Man must necessarily be both Iust and Merciful too . But is this Form or Act , we call Goodness Formally in GOD ? Let us see . We find another Attribute ●n GOD call'd Wisdom , which is formally Distinct from the Notion of Goodness , and Goodness from it ; for every Good Man is not Wise , nor is every Wise Man Good. Wherefore , neither of these can be Formally in GOD ; nor , consequently , can either of them be predicated properly of GOD , according to those Disti●ct Notions we have of them ; for this again would put Formal Distinction in GOD , which is a high Imperfection . But , perhaps , Wisdom and Goodness are found in some Third Notion which is formally in GOD. Let us see . We find in GOD , Entity or Being , and both these have ( as all other Perfections also have ) Entity in them ; and the same Ens or Thing may have both these in it ; and if it fails of having them when as it ought to have them , it falls so far short , or is Imperfect under the Notion of Ens. Let 's go on , and ask : Is our Notion of Ens predicated with Propriety of GOD ? No certainly : For the Notion of an Ens amongst us is Distinct from the Notion of Existent ; and , we truly say of those we call Entia or Things , that they sometimes Exist , and sometimes not-Exist . Whence our Notion of Ens , not having Actual Being in it , can only be this , that it has a Power to be , which is so far from being Properly said of GOD whose Essence is a Pure Actuality of Being , that 't is Diametrically Opposite to it . Is our Notion of Existence at least with propriety said of GOD ? No , neither : For , [ Existence ] amongst us signifies only the Act of the Thing , or somewhat of it , but it does not signifie the Exister ; which yet GOD most properly is . But , being once come to Existence , we are at the Top , and the Highest , Purest and Best of of all our Human Notions , and can go no farther . 52. Whence is clearly deduced , that there is no Notion we have , or Word we use , which , in propriety of Speech , may not be Deny'd of GOD , because his Infinitely Simple , and yet All Perfect Existence , includes them all in one All-comprehending Formality . And this is the Ground , and indeed , the Sum of Mystick Theology , which teaches us , that we truly understand nothing of the Divine Nature as it is in it self . Wherefore , when they would speak of his Attributes , they are forced to use the words , 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , Supra quam Bonus , suprr quam Infinitus ; and call him , 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , That of which all things are said , ( meaning , that he is the Ple●itude of Being , ) all things Deny'd , because of the Ineffable Excellency of his Self-existent Being ; and in this they agree with us ; so that they tell us , Nihil de Deo a nobis proprie pronunciatur quod ejus proprietatem assequatur , neque Secundum Privationem , ●t Immortalis , & Similia ; neque secundum Positionem , ut Vita , Unum , &c. The Ground then of Mystick Theology is Good and Solid , if the Descant upon that Ground be but as it ought . In this they differ from Metaphysicians ; that These , as becomes Philosophers , make use of their Best Natural Notions , and improve and compound them to express the Divine Excellencies ; and content themselves with speaking of GOD as well as they can : Acknowledging , in the mean time , with all profound Submission , that neither our Thoughts can think , or our Words express him with Propriety as He is in Himself : Whereas the Mysticks would speak of GOD , as He is in Himself , if they could ; but seeing they cannot , they fly to Negative Expressions as their Best Refuge ; but finding that these also fall short , they acknowledge the Impropriety of these too ; and by this means set the Divine Essence in that Sublime height , by acknowledging none of our Words ●or Thoughts can reach Him. MEDITATION . THus by Studying attentively the Book of Creatures , and reflecting heedfully on those Natural Notions they gave us , which were the most Sublime , and most Defaecated from Matter , we have transcended Nature it self , and all the Lower Orbs of Finite Beings ; and have soar'd up to their Great Creatour and Divine Original . Nay , we have gain'd some distant Glimmerings of His Essence it self , and of all his Glorious Attributes . An Object worthy the Contemplation of our Best Thoughts ; ( Oh , may they ever fix and dwell there ! ) in comparison of which , our Highest Speculations are but meer Trash , and the whole Emyclopaedia of all Human Sciences but Empty Descants on Subjects which are next to Nothing . So certain a Truth it is , That if we regard the true End of our Nature , we were neither born to Love , nor to Know , any thing but Him , or in order to Him. We have discover'd , under penalty of admitting a Contradiction , ( that is , most evidently ) that , since there can be no Notions belonging to Being , but either Power to be and Actual Being ; therefore , the Essences of all Beings we can imagine must either of their own Nature , have Actual Being in them , or not have it ; and that , if they have it not , they must necessarily be only Potential to that Act we call Existence , that is , they can have of themselves , only a Power to be ; and the plainest Light if Reason assures us , that what is , of it 's own Nature , only a Power to be , can neither make it Self , nor Others to be Actually . Whence follows unavoidably , that unless there had been ever some Self-Being , ●● something whose very Essence it was to Exist , neither it self , nor any thing else , could have been Actually ; and that , therefore , as Certain as it is , that any Thing now is , so Certain it is that there is , and has ever been , such a First Being to whom it is Essential to Exist , or a GOD. Since then Existence , or Actual Being , was His Essence or Nature ; and , consequently , he was Existence it self , nor , ( he being the First Ens ) could there be any Thing that could limit this Existence ; it follows , that this Essence of His ( His Existence ) was absolutely Unlimited , or Infinite ; and , consequently , that it did contain in it , after an Eminent manner , ( as became a Pure Actuality of Being , ) all that could be comprehended in the Spacious Extent of Being it self ; Whence , he has all the Perfections ●● Him that have Entity or Being in them , ( Defects , such as are Sin , and other Privations , are not such ) and this in an Infinite manner ; and , so , He is Infinitely Perfect . Whence follow● , That His Essence includes all those Divine Attributes of Infinitely Wise , Good , Iust , Merciful , Veracious , Powerful , &c. and this in such a manner , that they are all Concenter'd Indivisibly in this one Simplest Formality of his Purest Actuality of Being , His SELF-EXISTENCE . All these , and divers other most important Truths have been Demonstrated here ( to the Honour of our Maker , and the Confusion of the Impugners of a Deity be it spoken ) with an Evidence as far beyond that of the Mathematicks , as the Notions of Power and Act , which are Transcendents , and therefore most Clear , ( of which we have made use , and on which our whole Discourse is grounded ) are more Evident than is the Nature of Quantity , the Object of the Mathematicks ; which an ordinary Reflexion will show us , is to a very Excessive Degree . For , what frequent Disputes have there been , and still continue undecided , amongst Bad Speculaters ( who will needs frame Notions out of their Fancy and Wit which Nature never gave them ) about the Nature of Quantity ? Whereas , on the other side , Who ever did , or could , raise any Dispute concerning the Notion of the word [ is , ] or [ can be , ] which express the Act and Power we speak of ? Besides , Mathematicians give us Definitions , or , at least , Explications , of their Lines , Figures , Angles , &c. Which confesses , that such Notions may be made Clearer ; whereas not all the Wit of Mankind can give us either Definitions or Explications of [ is ] or [ can be , ] or make them Clearer than they are of themselves : And , whoever attempts it , will see , that instead of Clearing them , by Defining or Explicating them , he wil blunder them , and make them more obscure , by being forced to use such words to explain them as are far more Obscure than what he went about to explain . Which amounts to this , that the Notions of Power and Act , cannot possibly be made more Evident , and , therefore , that they are Self-Evident ; which cannot be said of any one Notion the Mathematicians use , since the Knowledge of them all depends ●● the Knowledge of the Nature of Quantity , and this , as we experience , is liable to dispute ; which it could not be , were it Self-Evident , as are those others ●● make use of : To be employ'd about such Self-Evident Notions is the Prerogative of the Noblest Science of METAPHYSICKS : These , and some ●●her such , are the Altissimae Causae , from which she draws her most Evident Demonstrations . To these Self-Evident Notions , and to her First Principles , ●●de up of such , she reduces the Evidence and Truth of her Sublime Discourses ; which none of the other Sciences , her Underlings , can ever pretend to , with●●● using her Assistance . And , lastly , from such Notions and such Principles , ( her Proper Object being ●●s as such , and those Notions as do properly apper●●●● to Being ) she Demonstrates a First Being , and 〈◊〉 his Infinite Attributes . This , proceeding upon her Principles , and assisted by Right Logick , we have perform'd to some Degree , Weakly indeed , but yet sufficiently to convince Atheists ; if , laying aside their ●●ving Fancies , they will but use their Common Reason : I hope also this will give hint to future Philosophers of better parts and more Leasurely and Quiet Circumstances , how they may carry on successfully what ●● have sleightly begun . But , what are we , my Soul , or others who read 〈◊〉 , the better for these Clear Informations of our Understanding , if they make no Impression on our Wills , ●●● improve us in Virtue and Christian Life ? Or , rather , are ●● not much worse for our Speculative Knowledge , if it remains in 〈◊〉 still Fruitless , and buds not forth into conformable Actions ? Certainly , that Man is far worse than a Sceptical Atheist , who is Assur'd there is a GOD , and lives as if there were none . Wherefore , since we are ascertain'd of these most concerning Truths by as Great an Evidence as Humane Nature is Capable of ; Let us next consider , what Affections it ought deservedly to excite in our Will , and what Duties it enjoyns us in our Practice . To To which end , let us ask our selves these Few Questions . What Profound Adoration do we owe to so Soveraign a Majesty ; before whom the Angels tremble , and with lowest Prostrations acknowledge themselves Impure and as Nothing in his Sight ? With what Reverence and Purity of Heart ought we to approach his Divine Presence , and appear before him when we put up o●r Petitions to him in Prayer ? Or , who can be so wickedly unmannerly , as to admit Voluntary Distractions , when he is fixing his Eye upon such ● Glorious Object ? What short-sighted Mortal dares presume so upon his own Shallow Wit , as to question the Truth of those High Mysteries and refuse assent to them , tho' he has Means to assure him , that GOD who is essentially VERACIOUS ●as Reveal'd them ; meerly , because they sute and colour not with his Dull and Low Fancies ? Is not this , in effect , to give Truth it self the Lye ? And how can they expect such an Affront will not be resented by an Infinite Majesty ? What an Encouragement is it to well-meaning Christians , to make them endeavour to dispose themselves by frequenting ▪ Holy Thoughts and Pious ▪ Ex●…ises , and also to raise and com●… their Hope ; that they shall 〈…〉 such Means , assuredly attain to ●…ver-ending Happiness ? What can m●re cheer our Drooping Thoughts th●n to know , that GOD is over●…ingly Bountiful and GOOD , 〈…〉 Essentially Self-determin'd to give to every Cre●t●re all the Good they are Capable of , or Dispos'd 〈…〉 receive ? Not the least Good Thought we think , 〈…〉 the least Good Wish of our Will , not the least Good Intention we mean , nor the least Good Action we perform , but it works in us ( thro' the Blessing of the same Goodness ) a farther Degree of Sanctity ; and has it 's Proportionable Reward laid 〈…〉 in Heaven . How careful then and sollicitous ought we to be , lest , by our Uncomplying Slothfulness , ●● Neglect of Duties , we give the least way to Temptations , or run back in Virtue , quench the Irradiations ●● His Holy Spirit , and put an Obstacle to the Ef●●●ence of his Boundless Generosity ; which stands ever ready to promote us to all those Degrees of Virtue which we heartily and affectionately wish , and with ● humble Confidence in the same Goodness pray for . Nay , when the former World , by reason of Original Corruption wanted efficacious Means to dispose Mankind for Heaven , the same Goodness did take that Concern into his own hand ; and , did , by his Providence ripen the World for Higher Knowledges , and dispos'd them by their Inquisitiveness what was Man 's Summum Bonum , and their Dissatisfactions about it , for that Fulness of Time , in which his Wisdom saw it Seasonable and Fit to send them a Divine Master to teach them such a Heavenly Doctriu● , as Rude Nature was till then incapable to conceive ●● aim at . How does it over-awe and terrifie our Corrupt and Inconstant Nature to know He is infinitely IUST ; and will infallibly punish severely every Transgression of His Dread Command● , nay , every Idle Word , according to the Degree of it's Demerit ? Can any Man hope to Byass a Iudge , whose Impartiality and Uprightness is Essential to Him ? Or , what Obstinate Sinner d●r●● hope to contrast with an Angry and Iust GOD , wh● is arm'd with OMNIPOTENCE ! And yet , what Sinner , tho' never so Enormous ▪ can Despair of Pardon , if he heartily repents ▪ and humbly asks it ; when he reflects , and con●●ders , that Both Faith and Evident Reason do assure him , that GOD is Infinitely MERCIFULL ? We do scarcely allow that Man to be Good-natur'd or Merciful , nay , we look upon him as Hard-hearted and Cruel , who will not forgive him that has offended him , if he be heartily Sorry for his Fault and begs his Pardon : And is it not then , a kind of Blasphemy to conceit , that ou● GOD , whose MERCY is Infinite , and withall , Essential to Him , should have less Goodness , Generosity and Mercy , than a Wretched , Narrow-hearted and P●evish Mortal ? Oh , What a Sure Anchor of HOPE is this Divine Attribute to poor Sinners , wh● fear the Eternal Wrack of their Soul , and are Sinking and almost Overwhelm'd with Despair ? ●hat an Encouragement and Invitation both to Weak ●…d to Wicked Souls , to repent of their Sins hearti●… and apply to the Throne of Grace ; where they ●re sure not to fail of obtaining Pardon , if with hum●●mble Confidence and Sincere Penitence they 〈…〉 it ? What Christian who acknowledges that GOD is ●nfinitely WISE , and therefore has ●…d the Order of the World after the Wisest and Best manner , can be Un●…gn'd when Crosses happen , and 〈…〉 Success of Temporal Affairs go not ●…rding to his Wish ? How Unrea●…ble is it to expect from an All●…e Universal Governour that he ●…ld pervert the Best Order of the ●…tion , or consent that All the World should be worse for the sake of one inconsider●ble Atome of it . Every Generous Man thinks it 〈…〉 fitting to suffer Inconveniencies , nay to hazard his life for the Common Good of his own Country , What an odious Selfishness is it then to repine at Suffe●…g much more for the Common Good of the Universe ? Especially , since the Resign'd Sufferer will gain ●●comparably greater Advantages by thus entircly Submitting to Providence , and humbling himself under ●● Omnipotent hand of GOD , than he can possibly ●…e from the enjoying that Temporal Good for which he was so passionately concerned . What Hypocrite can hope to disguise his Base Intentions and Doubling Wiles ; or to . ●ood-wink Him who is Essentially ALL-SEEING ? Or what more Powerful Motive to make False●earted Pretenders to Virtue and Honesty , leave off their Foolish Insincerity ; and to take care that their Thoughts and Actions be all of a piece ? Lastly , What Christian heart can be so Insensible of GOD's Noble Kindness and Bounty as not to love God with the whole Bent of his Will , who desires no more of us to make us Eternally Happy , but that we would pursue our own True Interest , and love above all things our Eternal Happiness , Himself ? Who is ready to pardon all our Sins at the first asking , if we heartily , sincerely and penitently ask it ? Who is ready to help its forward every step we take in Virtue , if we be but willing to help our selves , and humbly beg his Assistance . How can that Man pretend to love any thing , who loves not Him in whom are all Things ? Or to love Himself , if he loves not his own only True Happiness ? These most efficacious Motives to the Best Virtues the Consideration of the Divine Attributes does plentifully afford us , besides what the Imitation of His Moral Attributes give us ; which will make us Perfect as He is Perfect , and by Transforming us into His Likeness here , raise us to be Perfectly Like Him , and , in some sort , Deifie us hereafter . Cum apparuerit , similes erimus ; quoniam videbimus , eum sicuti est . Ioan. Ep. 1. Ch. 3. V. 2. Transnatural Philosophy : OR , METAPHYSICKS . BOOK IV. Of the several OPERATIONS of Things ; and of the Manner ( in common ) How the First Being administers His World. 1. ALL Power of Operating or Acting springs immediately from the ●●●stence of the Thing ; or ( which is the same ) from the Thing as it Exists . For , since the Essence , precisely consider'd , i● only a Power to Exist ; and what is only a Power to Exist , is not ; and no Operation can proceed from what , according to it 's own precise Nature or Notion , is not . It follows , that all Power of Operating or Acting must proceed from the Existence of the Thing , or from the-Thing as it Exists . 2. Therefore , the Power of Operating thus or thus particularly , or from which it has such or such a Power of Operating , springs from the Thing as it is such , or such ; or , as it is this or that Sort of Thing . This is Evident from the Former , additis addendis . Besides , were not this so , Every Thing might do Any Thing , which is against our Constant Experience . 3. Therefore all Power of Operating , as 't is such an Operation , proceeds from the Essence of the Thing . Because the Essence is that which constitutes it formally such or such a Sort of Thing . 4. Therefore all Causality whatever is the Imparting or Communicating something , or somewhat , that is in the Cause . For , since every Effect is Determinate , that is , such o● such ; and , is made such by such an Operation ; and the Operation is such , because ( by § . 3. ) i● proceeds from such an Essen●● it follows , that the Operation carries forwa●● that Respect , or Formality , by which the Caus● was denominated such , and imparts or communicates it to the Effect or to the Subject on which it works ; so that the Power of imparting it , 〈…〉 't is such , or of determining it , is taken from 〈…〉 Essence , which is such it self ; and the Power ●… Actually Imparting it , which we call it's Efficiency , springs from the Existence ; which ( as it were ) stamps or imprints somewhat which is found in the Essence , upon the Patient ; according to that Maxim , Operatio sequitur Esse . 5. Hence Motion , according to it 's common Notion precisely , serves only to apply closely the Agent to the Patient ; This is Evident , because it has been now demonstrated , that the whole Power or Virtue of the Cause , enabling it to make the Effect such , or to make it actually any Effect at all , is taken from the Essence and the Existence . 6. The First Operation among Bodies is Divi●… ▪ For , since Quantity is the ●…t Common Affection of All Bodies , that is , of Body in common ; That Operation on Bodies must be the First that works upon Quantity as Quantity . Wherefore , since it has been Demonstrated , that Quantity ( as it is in Nature , or grounds Natural Action and Passion ) is Divisibility , or a Power to be Divided ; that Natural Operation , or Action , must be the First which puts in Act that Power of being Divided , or is exercis'd upon Divisibility as such . But this ( as appears from the very terms ) is Division . Therefore the First Operation among Bodies is Division . foreover , since it is not probable there should be now-adays any other Bodies but Mixts ; and Mixture could only be made by Division of the ●●rer Bodies made by Dense ones ; it follows , that 〈…〉 this regard also the First Operation of one Body upon another must be Division . 7. The next immediate Operations of one Body upon another , are those two Simple Motions , call'd Pulsus and Tractus ; or Impulse and Attraction : For , since , when one Body acts upon another , it must either Divide that Other , or not-Divide it ; and Division evidently produces the Former Effect , and Impulse and Attraction the Later ; 't is manifest , that the Next , or rather ( they being contradictorily Distinct , ) the Only remaining Immediate Operations of one Body on another are Impulse and Attraction ; neither of which ( as is Evident ) do divide the Body they work upon . Again , since all Operation of one Body upon another is perform'd by Local Motion ; and all Simple , or meer Motion must either be towards or fromwards the other Body ; and therefore , in case it do not divide it , must tend to drive it before it , or draw it after it : 'T is manifest that these two Operations of Impulse and Attraction are the only-remaining immediate Operations of one Body on another . 8. The Reason of these two Operations cannot be fetcht from Physical Principles , but from Metaphysicks . For , since the reason of this Attraction cannot be any Physical Quality , such as are Glutinousness , Tenaciousness , &c. because these are found only in a few Bodies , whereas these Operations have their Effect on All : Nor can the Operation of Impulse be refunded into the Primary Qualities either of Rarity and Density ; in regard we find they have Equal Effect on Rare Bodies as on Dense ones ; ●uch less , for the same reason , can this proceed from any Occult Qualities , ( as they call them ) by virtue of which , some one Body flies from another ●…t of Antipathy , or out of Sympathy follows it , ●…s happens in some particular Bodies , ) because , 〈…〉 was said , this happens in All Bodies whatever : 〈…〉 is manifest , that the true Cause of these Operations must be fetcht from a Higher Cause than any Physical Principles can reach ; and , therefore , it must be fetcht from Metaphysicks . 9. Nor can they proceed from the Metaphysical Notion or Natures of Matter and Form. For both those Notions are terminated in compounding an Individual Body , and rendring it Capable of Exist●… or an Ens ; and therefore they formally and ●…perly respect Being only : Which is a Different ●●ct from that in Question . 10. Wherefore the true Reason of these two Operations must be drawn , as from it's Ground , from the Common Essence of the First Affection of Natural Entities or Bodies , which is QUANTITY . For , since these Operations of Impel●… and Attracting , are , as Experience teaches 〈…〉 Common to All Bodies , or to Body in Com●… ; they must be refunded in the most Common ●…tion that can belong to Body ; that is , from 〈…〉 Quantity . And , since they cannot proceed 〈…〉 those particular Modifications of Quantity , 〈…〉 as are all Physical Qualities ; nor yet from 〈…〉 Matter and Form which compound those Bo●… ; they must necessarily be refunded into the Essence it self of Quantity in Common ; or into such Properties , of it as are most neerly ally'd to it's Essence ; or , rather , are diverse Respects or Considerations of it . 11. To clear this Point more fully , I Discourse thus . Ens , and consequently , Unum , are Transcendents , and , are apply'd to all the Te● Predicaments , or Common Heads of our Natural Notions : And yet so , that they are Properly , or in their First Signification , predicated only of Substance or Thing ; and of the rest , Improperly , Analogically or Secondarily ; as is demonstrated , Method to Science , B. 1. Less . 4. §§ . 1. and 2. and is even known by the Goodness of Nature , and the Common Use of Human Language , to the Rude Vulgar ; as is shown there , § . 4. &c. Pag. 39. However , they have their Analogical Essences ; and , as their Notions are distinct , so we can discourse of each of them as distinctly , as we can of Distinct Substances , and perhaps more . Moreover , these words [ Ens ] and [ Unum , ] are spoken of no Two of those Heads Univocally , or in the same Signification : For , were it so , En● would be a Proper Genus to those Two , and so those Two ought to be put in one and the same Predicament ; which is against Common Sense ; as will appear to any meanest Considerer who reflects on the Distinction of the Predicaments , and the vast difference of their respective Notions And , who sees not how impossible it is that the meaning of Unum or One , according to Action , Place or Habit , should have the same Common Notion with One according to Substance , Quality , Relation , or any of the Others ? These Grounds laid , the Question now is , What is the Analogical Entity or Unity peculiar and Proper to Quantity as Distinct from the rest ? What we affirm i● ▪ that since we see that those Entities which are not actually Divided , are only Capable to be Divided ; and this by reason of their Quantity , and not of their Substance , Quality , or any other Respect ; therefore the Notion or Essence of Quantity is Divisibility . And let it be noted , that we speak not here of Quantity according to a Mathematical Consideration , but according to a Physical one ; or as it is the Cause of Natural Action or Passion , and affects it's Subject accordingly . Now Divisibility , or a Capacity to be Divided , excludes being Actually Divided already : Wherefore since what 's Actually Divided is made more according to it's Quantity , or more Quanta , what 's only Divisible , is , eo ipso , One in Quantity . Wherefore , since , if any two Bodies in Nature were Discontinu'd , they would be Actually Divided according to the Notion of Quantity ; It follows , that the Unity , peculiar to Quantity is Continuity . Wherefore , all the Bodies in the World , having Quantity in them , must have Divisibility in them which is the Essence of Quantity ; and , consequently , they must have Continuity in them , which is its Proper Unity : Which shows , that all Quantitative things having essentially Continuity ▪ in them , or , which is the same , Coherence of their Parts ; It follows , that they must as necessarily cohere , as it is , that what has Coherence of parts in it , it's parts must cohere ; or which is the same , What Coheres , does Cohere . And yet what a puzzle has ●● cost diverse Great Wits to find out a reason for the Coherence of the parts of Quantity ; while they sought in Physical Causes where it was not to be found , and not in Metaphysicks , which discoursing of the Essences of Things , demonstrates it ab altissimis Causis , and gives it ascertain'd to their Hands ? For the self-same reason , all Vacuum within the World , which is evidently Discontinuity of Quantity , or a Chasm or Interruption of it , is Demonstrated Impossible and Contradictory ; and amounts to these Propositions , when resolv'd into it's Proper Principles , viz. Continuity is not Continuity ; Quantity is not Quantity : Quantitative Unity is Quantitative Plurality , &c. When the Natures or Essences of Things are not attended to , and thence become Violated , the Genuine Consequences of such Discourses must necessarily be open Contradictions . In vain then do Ingenious Men endeavour to torture Nature by Suckers in Pumps , and such Inventions , to find out a Vacuum . The Essences of every Thing , and of every Mode of Thing , are Establisht by the First Being ; and sooner may all Nature be torn into Atomes , than they can cease to be what they are . To proceed , 12. Hence is shown the reason also of Attraction ; and why , when one Body is mov'd fromwards Another , that other must follow ; otherwise ▪ ( except in the Case to be mention'd , § . 13. ) that other would become Discontinu'd ; which , a● was said , involves a Contradiction . And , from the same Ground follows the necessity of some Impulse , when one is mov'd towards Another . For Quantity or Divisibility cannot be in a Subject ●…hout rendring it Divisible : Nor could it be ●…isible , unless it 's Potential Parts were out of , ●…d not within one Another , which we call Pe●…rated ; that so there might be space enough 〈…〉 the Dividing Body to come between it's parts ; 〈…〉 which Division formally consists : Nor could 〈…〉 be , if the parts of Quantity were Penetrated , 〈…〉 not-Extended . Whence follows , that it must , 〈…〉 the Motion continues , be Impell'd or Driven ●…wards . 13. Notwithstanding , every Impulse does , to 〈…〉 degree , Condense the Impell'd Body ; and ●…ry Attraction does to some de●…e Rarifie that which is Attra●… ; at least at first . For , since ●…re can be no Action in Nature ●…hout it 's Proper or Formal ●…ect ; or can any Agent work ●…on Body , but according to such or such a pre●…se Respect , in which 't is Passive ; and there are manifestly Two Operations or Actions in Nature , ●…ll'd Impelling and Attracting ; and these have their Formal Effects upon Quantity ; and all Effects upon Quantity must either be upon the Essence of it , as has been shown , from § . 6. to § . 13. 〈…〉 else according to its Differences , that is , on Bo●… , as they are more or less Divisible ; or , as they 〈…〉 Rare or Dense : It follows , that whenever any ●…p●llent or Attracting Body acts upon another , 〈…〉 will first Compress and Condense its parts , or Di●… , and Rarifie them ; till the Motion being ●ommunicated through the Whole , it drives forwards or draws after it the whole Intire Body it works upon . That the Effect of Impulse and Attraction are Formally on Quantity , or on Body as it is Quantitative , and not as it is Substance , or affected with any other Mode , is demonstrated in the Appendix to my Method to Science , § . 25. 14. All these Operations are either perform'd by Local Motion , or concomitantly with it . For , Division , or the Sliding of the parts of the Dividing Body between the parts of the Body Divided , ( which is formally Division , ) is most manifestly Local Motion . Also , the Imp●lling another Body before it , or Drawing them after it , is clearly to make them change Place , or move Locally : And the same must be said of Rarefaction and Condensation ; which dilate the Body so as to take up a Greater Place , or Shrink ▪ it into a Lesser ; which is , in some Degree , to chang●● Place . 15. All Motion comes at first from the Angelical Nature . This has been Demonstrated , B. 2. Ch. 2. §§ . 4 , 5. and Method to Science , pag. 299. Thesis IV. Ideae Cartefianae , p. 44. § . 31. and Raillery Defeated , § . 43. In which places this Demonstration is maintain'd and enforced . And it is further shown agreeable to Reason . For , since on the one side , all Action in Nature ( abating the formality of connotating or respecting the Agent ) is the same as Motion , and therefore must proceed from some Act , or such a Thing as has the Nature of Act in it ; and Angels are Pure Acts ; and , consequently , more able to Act than Bodies are ; they are , therefore , in this regard , fit Agents to produce Action or Motion ; especially , since ( as is seen ●… . Ch. 2. § . 8. ) they contain all Body , and , con●…ently , every Mode or Virtue of Body in them . 〈…〉 the other side , since Motion in its precise Na●… , or ▪ as distinguisht from its Subject , is the 〈…〉 approaching to Non-Entity and Non-Existence 〈…〉 any Notion we have , ( as is shown in my Me●… , B. 1. Less . 8. § . 2. ) and , for that Reason ▪ ●…ot proceed immediately from GOD , who is Es●…l EXISTENCE ; it follows , that tho' it be such 〈…〉 Imperfect Effect , it may yet proceed congru●…y enough from an Angel ; who , he being a ●…r● , and as such , having no Prerogative in ●…s regard over his Fellow-Creatures ; has No●… , ( as o● Himself ) or Non-Existence , in●… in his very Being , which fit him in every ●…rd to be the most Proper Immediate Cause of ●…tion . Lastly , 't is a most senseless opinion , to think ●…at GOD , as the Cartesians hold , gives all Created ●●●●es their Being , and endows them with Facul●… and Powers to perform such or such Operati●…s , and yet will not permit them to perform them , ●…t does all the lowest and meanest Effects immediately by Himself ; which is at once Derogatory 〈…〉 GOD 's Supreme Majesty , and makes those ●ow●rs themselves Useless , Frustaneous , and ●…d for Nothing ; which is against the Metaphy●…al ▪ Bonity or Goodness , which is a Property of ●…eir Entity ; as has been shown , B. 1. Ch. 2. 〈…〉 11 , 12 , 13. 16. All Motion is a Perpetual Novelty , or a ●ontinu'd New Effect . For , since ●o Succeeding part of Motion is , while the foregoing ones are ●…ssing ; nor can , possibly , be any of those parts which went before ; it follows that each of them is made a-new , or is a New Effect . 17. Therefore Motion requires a Continual Influx of the Moving Cause . For , since no part of Motion can be of it self ; and every part of it is a Distinct or New Effect ; also , since to move a thing thus far is not to move it farther ; and the same reason holds all along thorow the whole Course of Motion : It must needs require continually either a New Cause , or a Continually New Effort of the same Moving Cause , to produce its Continuance , otherwise it might cease in any part of it's Flux , were it not still helpt forward . 18. This Continuance of Motion is perform'd by the Operation of some Chief Angel incessantly Rarefying the Matter of the Solar Bodies ; and consequently , darting out it's Rays of Light , or Fire , to those Bulks of Matter which are within it's Influence . For , since this Continual Rarefaction forces the preceeding Particles or Rays to fly forwards to make place for the succeeding ones ; and this with a quickness proportionable to the Penetrativeness or Tenuity of those Particles which is Inconceiveably such ; and these affecting and piercing , by degrees , more Solid Bodies , do set all their several parts a playing , according to their respective Natures , from which must necessarily ensue the several Motions of Division , Impulse , Attraction , and consequently of Rarefaction and Condensation , which are the Parents of all other more particular Operations ; from which , as even Experience tells us , do proceed all the Effects in Nature : It follows , that this Continual Rarefaction of the Solar Matter is the Cause of the ●…tinuance of all our Motion . As Experience 〈…〉 say , ) also teaches us in the Change of the Sea●…s of the year ; whence Common Reason as●…res us , that should that Angelical Operation ●…se for some considerable time , all the Earth ●…ould be nothing but a frozen , unactive and un●oveable Mass. 19. Angels are Pre-mov'd by the First Being to ●ove the Material World , even to the least Atome or Circumstance of it , in such a Manner as 〈…〉 most Agreeable to his Eternal ●…d Immutable Decrees . For , ●…ce it belongs to Infinite Wis●… to administer the whole ●…eation , or the Universality of his Creatures , ●…ording to the Wisest and Best Manner ; and t●● Managery of the Material World is carry'd ●● by Motion ; and Motion is effected by Angels ●● its Immediate Causes ; and Angels are Intelligent Beings , which act by Knowledge , ●…d are Premov'd or Determin'd to act by Motives ; and the Best Motives to make Faithful Servants ●ct , is to Know their Master's Will ; Nor could ●●ey know his Will , or his most hidden and In●…able Decrees by which they were to square ●…ir Actions , unless GOD had some way or other ●●nifested them : It follows , that these Mani●…tions of his Divine Pleasure are the Proper Motives to them to move and order all Material ●ature as He had Decreed . Which , ( this Order ●f the World being the Best , ) reaches to the ●ost Minute Parts and Least Circumstances of ●… . 20. The First or Chief Bodies , thus mov'd by Angels , do in their manner Premove , that is , Determine and Continue the Motion given them at first by the Angelical Nature . For , since an Instrument is Movens Motum , or such a thing as being Mov'd by another has a power to produce immediately the Effect it is Design'd for ; and 't is evident from what 's said above , that Bodies have a Power in them to Divide , Impel , Attract , and thence to Rarifie and Condense others , as Immediate Agents ; 'T is manifest , that by the First of these Effects , the Bulk , Figure , Situation , and consequently the Mixture or Texture of the Component Parts of the other Bodies , which they do thus move are made ; and from the other motions their Intrinsecal Temperament , or the Rarity and Density of those Parts proceeds : All which being Determinate Effects , proceeding from Bodies as their Immediate Movers ; 'T is Evident , that this Determination and Continuance of Motion springs immediately from the Motion of the next precedent Body , which by its Motion premoves , and determines the Motion of the following ones . 21. Hence , Angels , and the Bodies they move , do , as Second Causes , Immediately Determine the Individuation of all Bodies whatever . For , since the Complexion of Accidents is the Essential Form , which by distinguishing it from all others , does constitute every Individual Body , by making it to be Determinately or Individually This , as has has been ●…ov'd , B. 1. Ch. 2. and , consequently , renders 〈…〉 Capable of Existence , or an Ens ; and this ●omplexion of Accidents is chiefly caus'd by the ●utting together Rare and Dense Parts in such a ●roportion ; and the Bulk , Figure and Situation ●f those Parts do concur also , and help in their way , to form it into such a Constant or Coherent ●…s , and to distinguish it from others ; and all these are immediately produced by the Operations mention'd in the foregoing § . which are caus'd by Angels as Moving Bodies , and by the Bodies themselves , as the Instrument of Intelligences , or ●● Moved by them : 'T is evinced , that Angels and bodies , as Second Causes , are the Immediate Determiners of the Individuation of all new-made bodies whatever . 22. 'T is beyond the Power of those Second Causes to give Existen●e to the least Body in Nature . For , since by § . 2. the Nature or Quality of the Operation follows from the Nature or Quality of the Agent , and ( as will be seen shortly ) is finally refunded into the Essence of the Cause whence it springs ; and none of those Things call'd Bodies , nor yet Angels which move them , have Existence in their Essence , but are meerly Capable of Being , and , as far as is of themselves , may not-be ; it follows , that however they may by their Operation impart to the new-made Ens , Motion , Rarity , Density , or other such Effects as either were Essential to them or sprung out of their Essence ; yet they could never communicate to them Existence , this being Extrinsecal and Accidental to them , and of an Excellency incomparably above or beyond their Essence , as much as the Notion of Act or Actual Being is above that of meer Power , or Possibility of Being , which is beyond all Proportion . 23. Therefore it can belong only to GOD , the First Cause , to give Actual Being or Existence , because only his Nature is Essentially Existent . 24. Therefore for the same reason it belongs to Him , and to Him only , to Conserve them in Being . For , since the reason , ( as far as is on His part ) why His Goodness gave them Being at first , was because they were Determinate Entia or Individua ; and only Capable of Being , and wanted it ; and they are still , for every moment afterwards , Entia or Capable of Being , and , as far as is of themselves , may , for every moment , not-be ; it follows , that for the same reason for which He gave them Being at first , it belongs to Him still to conserve it . And that none else can support them in Being is hence Evident ; because all Creatures ( they being of their own Nature meerly capable to be ) do want a Support themselves : Besides that Actual Being , even when Creatures have it , is Extrinsecal to their Essences , from which only the Nature or Quality of the Effect proceeds , by §§ . 2 , 3 , 4. 25. For the same Reason , if the Thing be Nobler , that is , fit for more , or Nobler Operations , a Nobler Existence must be given it , else a Contradiction would follow , viz. ●… That Thing would be otherwise than it should be , ●…d consequently , otherwise than 't is Capable to be ; which is a Contradiction . 26. For the same Reason , if Matter , rais'd to it's highest pitch , come to ●● so dispos'd , that it requires 〈…〉 Form of a higher , or Spiritual , Nature , that Capacity is Supply'd by the First Being , according to the Exigency of that Matter ; and a Form of a Spiritual Nature , or a Soul , will be in it . And , because Matter and Form compound an Ens , o● a Thing Capable of Existence ; therefore , at the same instant , an Existence suitable to b●th ●●ose Natures , ( that is , Corporeo-Spiritual ) will ( by § . 25. ) be given it by GOD's Redundant Goodness and Steady Emanation of Being . 27. For the same Reason also , even in Spiritual and Supernatural Endowments , those who are Dispos'd by an Ardent Desire of them , a●d apply to the Giver of them by Fervent and Frequent Acts of : their Will , relying with per●●ct Confidence on his Ungrudging Bounty , may be Infallibly sure to receive them . Which is the greatest Comfort and Encouragement to Weak and Well-meaning Souls ; and , debars rechless and wicked Sinners from all hope of Excuse ; since there had needed no more to make them Virtuous Saints , than only to have ask'd it with Humility , Faith , and Perseverance . 28. For the same Reason , GOD , who is Self-Existence , and therefore Infinitely Perfect , cannot be the Cause of any Defect ; whether it be Natural , or Moral which we call Sin ; but such Defects are refunded into the Incapacity of Creatures that were to receive these farther Perfections , or into their Defectiveness in Operating ; Much less can he be the Cause of the Greatest , or rather Total Defect , [ Not-being . ] 29. Hence is seen , that all the several sorts of Operations that are , have been , or can be , are finally refunded into the Essences of the Things that operate . For the Operation must be such as the Power to operate is , nor can be at all without it ; for , otherwise , a Thing might do what it has no Power to do ; that is , might do what it cannot do . And the Power of Acting is such as the Essence is ; and among Creatures , springs from It as it Root , being a Property of it . To show this particularly : The Operation of Attraction , is grounded on the Unity ( that is the Essence ) of Quantity , which is Continuity . The Operation of Impulse springs from the Impenetrability of Quantitative Parts , which is either the Nature of Divisibility , ( or Quantity ) or else next a kin to it ; as is shown above , § . 12. The Operations of Rarefaction and Condensation , ( by § . 13. ) clearly arise from the former ; and therefore from the Essence of the same Cause on which those Former Operations were grounded . The First Motion or Action of all Bodies , and the Continuance of ●●●m , is refunded into the Essence of Angels ; which , on the one side , being Pure Acts , are the ●●est Agents to be the Origin of Action , which ● done by Motion : On the other side , having no●●●ng of Actual Being or Existence in their Na●●●e , they can only produce that Inferiour Effect , ●●●d Motion , in such Beings as are below them ▪ ●●stly , the Operation of Creating , or Giving Actual Being , springs peculiarly from the Essence of the First Being , which is Self-Existence . By which is seen , ( without need of particularizing ) ●●w Wisely the FIRST BEING administers His World , by Reserving to Himself to be the Imme●●●e Cause of the Noblest Effect , and most resem●●ng Him [ Existence ; ] and appointing his Underlings and Journeymen the Angels to move every part of the Material World according to their respective Natures . By which means the well-compacted Frame and Course of Nature hangs together by the Indissoluble Connexion of Proper Causes with their Proper Effects . And , ●●ce all the Exact Knowledge , or Science , we have , is built on this ; His Creative Wisdom does by this Means give Knowledge to those Cogno●●ive Creatures , which because they are not ●ure Acts , and , consequently , have not Knowledge due to them by their Creation ; are to Ac●●re it here from Natural Objects affecting their ●oul by means of their Senses , and by Reflexion on the Notions they imprint . 30. From what has been prov'd hitherto , it has been demonstrated , how our Great and Wise GOD does all that is Good , or has Being in it , in all things . For , they have their Essences from the Ideas in his Divine Understanding ; and their Existences by his Peculiar and Immediate Act of Creation : He still conserves their Essence in Being , by the same Continued Action ; and , at the same time , all their Faculties and Powers , by which they act on one another . He puts them forwards to exercise those several Faculties , and actually to produce their Operations on one another , according to their Natures , by Motion which is given them by his Chief Officers in administring the World , Angels ; and continues their Motions and Operations by their Incessant perpetuating of that Motion . So that both their Essences , their Actual Being , their Power to act , their Exercise of that Power ; and , consequently , whatever belongs to the Action it self , as far as it is Positive , or has Entity and Goodness in it , ( and , amongst the rest , the Determination of our Will to what 's Good and Virtuous ) do all of them Entirely depend on GOD , and are Deriv'd from Him. — Ip●● Honor & Gloria in saecula saeculorum . Amen . MEDITATION . THe Essences of Things , which give all Bodies their several Sorts of Operation being esta●…t by GOD ; and Vacuum being own Impossible from the Conti●●ity of Quantity , which is it's ●●d of Unity , or Entity ; It fol●●●s , that all the Bodies of the ●aterial World do immediately con●● upon , or touch one another ; ●● ▪ therefore being set on work , ●pusht forward by Motion , which i● given and continu'd to them by the Angelical Nature , they must necessarily affect , or work upon , one another ; and this according to their respective Essences ; or , ( as we express it in Philosophical Language ) Proper Causes must still produce proper Effects . And , seeing this Reason holds in all Bodies whatever , since the Creation was finisht and Natural Causes begun to move in a Regular Order ; ●●sequently the whole Course of Nature ( to show and ●●plain which is the Work of a Natural Philosopher ) ●●sists in the Production of such Effects as are Proper ●d suteable to the Genius of their Causes . Thus is the Providence of our Great GOD , ad●inistring the World after the Wisest ●anner , Demonstrated a Priori . And , that this way of Governing the Material World does most become His Divine Wisdom appears hence , that ( as was lately said ) all our Acquir'd Wisdom in Natural things , or all our Science , is entirely grounded on our Knowing this Connexion of such Causes with such Effects ; insomuch , that all Mankind would be a pack of Ignorant Fools , if the Consequence of these later from the former were not Certainly establisht ; since , in that case , they could never know what things they were to make use of , to compass any Effect they intended ; nor know what to eschew , and what to pursue : No Proportion of any Means to the End being Possible to be known , in case such Determinate Causes were not apt to produce such Determinate and Proper Effects ; or , ( which is the same ) if every thing did not Act as it Is , but that Any thing might do , or not do , Any thing . Nor is this Connected Tenour of managing the Material World by Proper Causes and Effects less Evident a posteriori . For , let us pitch our thought upon any one Effect done at present ; and , let it be the Greatest , or the most Inconsiderable one , ( as it may seem to us ; ) for this alters not the case : Plainest Reason will tell us , that either it had some Cause , or it had none . If it had none , and yet is ; it must have been Self-Existent : Which is both against Experience , for we see it lately produced ; and against our Reason too ; because to be Self-Existent is an Incommunicable Attribute of the DEITY . If it had a Cause , then that Cause was either Indifferent to produce this or any other Effect ; in which ca●e it could produce Nothing ; since Ex indifferenti nihil sequitur : Besides , every Effect ( whether it be a Thing , or a Mode of Thing ) is Determinate ; for whatever is produc'd , ●s , and whatever is is Determinate , since nothing in common can be ; and an Indeterminate Cause cannot produce an Determinate Effect ; for in that Supposition it would work contradictorily to it's self . It must then be Determinately apt , or Proper , to produce this kind of Effect , and no other . This Effect was therefore put because there was such a Determinate or Proper Cause to produce it . This seen , let us make the same Discourse concerning that which was the Proper Cause , as we did now concerning its Effect now mention'd ; and so , of all the Antecedent Causes in the World , since Time first started into Motion . Each of them Existed , or was , in it's Season ; None of them could exist of themselves ; therefore each of them had a Cause ; and that , by our former Discourse , a Determinate or Proper one . Nothing therefore is , or can be , more Demonstrable , nor more immediately reducible to Self-Evidence , than it is , that the whole Course of Nature is carry'd on by Proper Causes and Proper Effects . This Consideration made that Great Aristotelian , and truly Christian Philosopher , Boetius , begin his Devout Rapture in these Words , [ O , qui perpetua Mundum Ratione gubernas ! ] The whole Current of our Reason runs upon this Ground , and proceeds every step in this beaten Track , that every Cause produces such Effects as are Agreeable and Proper to its peculiar Nature ; and this perpetually , or thro' the whole Course of the World. For were the Line of Causality interrupted by Chasms and Interstices , our Reason would be at an utter Loss . This it was also which made that Divine Writer , the Author of Ecclesiasticus , speaking of the Manner in which the World is Administer'd by the Divine Wisdom , deliver his comprehensive Thoughts in these Emphatical Words , [ Attingit a fine in finem fortiter , & disponit omnia suaviter : It reaches from the Beginning to the End , ( or carries it quite thorow ) Strongly ; for , what stronger than the Infractile Chain of Causality , establisht on this Great and Self-Evident Truth , that Nothing can make it self , or ( which is the same ) Nothing that is only Potential , or meerly in power to work an Effect , can reduce it Self to Act , as to that Effect ? Or , what Disposition more Sweet , or farther from offering Violence to the Nature of any Cause , than 't is to order that it should work connaturally , or Act as it is ? Notwithstanding the Greatest and Clearest Truths can never want Enemies while there is Errour in the World ; Nor will there ever want Errour , as long as Men , either carelessly or wilfully , decline the only Paths that lead to Truth ; which are , to bottom their Discourse at first on Evident Principles ; and to Connect orderly those Notions which GOD , as Author of Nature , has given us by his Creatures . This Wisest Conduct of the Divine Providence has two Capital Enemies : The one is the Epicurean Sect , and their Followers ; who put all Effects to light by CHANCE , and , therefore , make CHANCE to be GOD's Competitour in Governing the World. The other is the Stoicks , who set up their more Ingenious , but equally Senseless Doctrine of FATALITY . The Former of these are sufficiently confuted by their laying never a Principle ; but , instead of them , advancing the Wildest ▪ Suppositions that Witty Folly could ever have stumbled upon , viz. An Infinite Vacuum ; that is , an Infinite Nothing : An Infinite Number of Atomes , of Infinitely-various Figures falling downwards perpetually ; only many of them , lest they should never ●ver-take their fellows , took a Toy , Crab-like , to move sideways ; by which means clinging in accidentally with those that mov'd downwards perpendicularly , they make several sorts of Bodies ; and , in process of time , of those several Bodies compound Earth , Stars , or whatever their Fancy pleases . Not me of these Principles they undertake to Evidence ; but grosly suppose , and kindly grant them to themselves . Tho' I dare undertake , that a hundred Clearest Demonstrations may be brought against them , taking them all together ; tho' One of them might suffice to sweep down , at one brush , that whole Cobweb Scheme . But these Men best Confute themselves . Chance bears in it's Notion Inconstancy ; and is quite Opposite to a Continual and Settled Method . I ask then , Is it by Chance that those Atomes were Self-Existent , as they pretend ? Is it by Chance , that they were originally , or of themselves , of so many various Figures ; whence they became apt to link so commodiously with one another for such an End ? Was it by Chance , that they , or at least the main Body of them mov'd downwards , and not upwards , and this perpendicularly ? From what determinate Points in that Nothing which they call Vacuum , do they measure or rate the Perpendicularity of this Motion of theirs ? Was it by Chance , that multitudes of them were so carefully Wise as to run aside ; lest , otherwise , not overtaking their fellows , ( for there can be no reason imaginable why one of them in a Vacuum should move faster than another ) all this frame of Nature , which they fancy , should be at an end ? What made them move at all ? Or what ail'd them that they could not lie still , when nothing impell'd them ? Certainly , this was a strange Chance that was so Constant , and withal as wisely Contriv'd for Epicurus his purpose as the best Design could order it . But the Truth is , they were only laid thus in Epicurus his own Fancy ; nor could he make any thing hang together , but by posturing them in order to an End ; now this is the plain Notion of Design ; which , since it could not proceed from meer Matter , sprung from his own Invention ; which he , to compleat the Nonsense of his Voluntary Hypothesis , Nicknames CHANCE . This Point so neerly concerning the honour of the Worlds Great Governour , it may seem strange that some Christian Philosophers should retain some hankering after an Opinion which is diametrically opposite to Providence . I cannot think the Learned and Pious Gassendus , while he receiv'd the Hypothesis of Epicurus , and oppos'd Aristotle , ( whom he did not understand , but apprehended some Modern Sch●olmen gave us his True Sense ; ) I say , I do not think he did believe what he writ , ( much less that he held any thing happen'd otherwise than by GOD's Providential Determination ) but that he advanced that Scheme of Philosophy as a Trial of Skill , and to show his Great Wit ; which it must be confest had few Equals . Cartesius had begun that Vast and Bold exploit of contriving how the World should be made ; and it bred an Emulation in Gassendns not to be behind him in such a Daring and Noble Projection : Besides , it was pardonable in an Author not to regard whe●hen the Philosophy he took to were True or No , who had the misfortune to be Sceptically inclin'd , and profest Nihil sciri . But , I was heartily troubled ●o find , by discoursing with an Eminent Writer , who ●ad deserv'd well of the World for his elaborate Book against Atheism ; that tho' he acknowledg'd the Order of Causes in the main , he did notwithstanding hold that Chance had the Chief hand in many particulars . To rectifie his Mistake , I scribbled two Sheets of Paper , and read to him . Whether they had any Effect upon him , or hindred him from publishing any of that Nature , ( for I perceiv'd he was then writing ) I have not Light to know . Only I know this , that 't is my Duty to use my best endeavour to vindicate the Providence of our Maker , and his Wisdom in the Ordinary Administration of the World ; and to show , that He is the Adequate and Sole Governour of it , even to the least Creature , or the least imperceptible Atome . To come closer then ; I ask , What is this Thing they call CHANCE ? I hear a Word indeed , which makes such a Sound in my Ear , and I perceive too that those who patronize it , have a blind Apprehension that it is a [ Thing , ] for they put it to act , and produce Effects ; which [ Nothing ] cannot do . And yet , what kind of Thing can it be ? Is it a Body , or a Spirit ? If a Spirit , is it a Created one or an Angel , or is it Increated ? If a Body , where dwells it in this habitable World ? Is it a Simple Body , or a Compound one ? Is it Intelligent , or not-intelligent ? Again , by what Virtue or Power does it work it's Effects , and how ? To none of these , I am sure , a Pertinent Answer can ever be given ; and yet it will haunt Men's Fancies , and bear a great part in their Discourses , tho' not very many have a Distinct Conception of what they mean by that Word . Truth is , 't is a strange Error in many weak Speculaters that they are apt not only to fancy every New Conception of ours to be a New Thing , but also that now and then they take Meer Words to be Real Things . Notwithstanding all that's here said , the word [ CHANCE ] must have some Signification ; and my self must allow it , ( nay all Mankind must do the same , since we do all of us use it , ) and yet I do not , in holding this , recede at all from my former Doctrine . To look narrowly then into the meaning of this Word , I find , that all the Words we have , or can have , must either signifie our Natural Notions , or Artificial ones ; as also , that [ Chance ] must express some Natural Notion , because the Vulgar use it ; and 't is the Common Usage of the word which gives it it's Signification . Let us see th●n in what Sense the Vulgar , so they be but moderately intelligent , do use that Word , and what they can mean by it . A Servant le ts fall a Glass , and breaks it ; a Tyle falls from a House and kills one who walks by in the Street ; a Man climbing a Ladder falls down and breaks his Neck ▪ Now all these are said to be done [ by Chance . ] But does any of these , who say so , hold , that there was no Cause at all , which made the Glass , the Tyle , or the Man fall . No certainly ; for every Man of Common Sense holds , that no Effect can be without a Cause , and will deny that a Tyle or a Glass did move themselves . Their meaning then is , and they tell you they did not fore-see , or fore-know , that any of these would fall , being Attentive to some other Object or Business : CHANCE then is an UNADVERTED or Unforeseen Cause ; for had they foreseen that such Causes , taking them all together would have brought those Disasters , it had been Willfulness and Design in them , to have come in the way of such Misohievous Causes ; and Design is Opposite to the Notion of Chance : In this Sense then Christianity allows us to say , the Chance , or an Unforeseen Cause wrought these Effect ●● But , since nothing is Unforeseen to GOD , who laid and order'd all those Causes ; What is Chance to Us , is Providence if we regard Him ; nor is there any Thing , Distinct from Him , call'd Chance , which has the least h●nd in administring the World , but He is the only Adequate Governor of it . 'T is not without some loathness I am forced to take notice , that some of our Modern Ideists ; ( tho' I hope with a good Intention ) do violate this connected course of Causes and Effects , in which GOD's Ordinary Providence consists . Whoever ( as do the Cartesians ) make all Second Causes which have Powers or Faculties given them to work such Effects , to be Useless as to those Effects , even as Instruments : Whoever puts on the Creature 's side , only OCCASIONS , which they say are No Causes , for every Act of Knowledge Mankind has , and perhaps for every Effect in Nature : Whoever puts Determinate Ideas to be produced by Indeterminate , and therefore Improper Causes , as the Soul was before she did elicit them ( as they pretend ) of her self : Whoever puts such Idea's Annext voluntarily to such Motions which were not at all Like them , or No Causes of them ; alledging gratis that GOD Wills it : Whoever maintains the Annexing of one Thing ▪ or Mode of Thing , to another otherwise than by being the Proper Cause of it , does fall into the same ill-grounded Errour of interrupting the Course of GOD's Ordinary Providence by Second Causes , and destroys the Laws of Causality : As has been over and over Demonstrated , in my Ideae Cartesianae , Indicatio Tertia , from § . 30. to § . 50. and in my Solid Philosophy Asserted , Reflexion 4. § : 3. and 5. It will run in the Fancies of some less Intelligent Intelligent Readers , who take things at the first rebound , and pass a peremptory Iudgment on what they understand but by halves ; that this Settled Order of Providence I here assert , does introduce a kind of Fatality into the World. Now , if by the word [ FATUM ] they mean what is Spoken or Decreed by GOD , I must own the Position , and stand to it as clearly demonstrated above : Which leads me to the Other sort of the Opposers of Providenoe ; I mean those who maintain a Stoical FATALITY ; a Tenet widely Different from our Thesis , or rather perfectly Contradictory to it . For ours proceeds upon a Continued Connexion of Natural Causes with Consequent Effects which are Suteable and Agreeable to their Natures : Theirs regards no Influence of any Causes at all ; but is built on the force of this Contradiction , [ Either such a thing will be , or will not be . ] Wherefore , say they , since it inevitably follows , that both of these cannot be True , and yet one of them must be True ; 't is a Folly to endeavour to avoid any Harm , or to pursue any Good , since out of the force of not-admitting Contradiction , what will be , will be . But this , tho' the Wittier of the two , is a Pure Folly ; since , as Common Experience tells us , and Common Sense assures us , nothing is done , but by Means of Causes , nor not-done , but because there wanted Causes able to do it : But they fancy to themselves by the Words [ will be , ] and [ will not be , ] there is a certain kind of Self-Existence , or Non-Self-Existenee in the Futurity of Events . Whereas none of them has , or can have , any Existence , or Non-Existence at all , but as they stand under Determinate Natural Causes , ●r no Causes . Whence , we , who know this to be so , are bound in Prudence to endeavour , as much as lies in us , to put those Causes , if we would have the Effect follow . They forget too , that We our selves are part of the Rank of Causes ; and that the using our own Reason in chusing and applying those other Causes , is the Supreme Superintendent Cause , and the very Best of all the rest . They reflect not also , that since Future Effects are not ; neither of those Propositions they put and rely on , has any Truth in it at all ; nor has the Futurity of it any Certainty , but as it stands under Determinate or Proper Causes which will produce that Effect , from which only it has Title to the name of Future . So that the Proposition , [ Such a thing will be or is future ] is an imprudent saying , and not be spoke by any Man of Sense , unless he sees the Causes will certainly make it be . These Discoursers do therefore argue from a Logical Impossibility , found only in our Mind , considering the Nature of Ens , and that it excludes Non-Ens out of it's Notion ; to a Physical one , which is wholly grounded on the Nature of Causes . Lastly , This Thesis is manifestly convicted of Folly , by the Consent of all Mankind , and even of themselves too , who do all of them lay means for the Effects they aim at . Nor could the World continue or subsist if this whimsical Doctrine stands ; as by applying it to a Harvest next year , the using ways for Trade and Traffick , or for defending our Country , and a thousand such particulars , does manifestly appear : For either Success will follow or not follow ; whither we endeavour or not endeavour to lay Means for such Effects ; which consideration will also help to cure those weak Discoursers who so perplex their thought about Predestination : All which depend on the same Principles ; and can disrellish no Man , unless he be offended , that GOD is the First Cause , and that Good comes to us from Him by Second Causes laid in the Best Order imaginable . But in how different a manner does our way of Philosophy discourse of GOD's Ordinary Providence from that of those other Philosophers , and particularly from that of the Ideists ! It puts no blind Suppositions nor Conceits taken from Fancy ; but is entirely built on Principles , and such Principles as are either Self-Evident , or so neerely remov'd from them , that they are easily reducible thither , viz. [ Every Thing acts as it is ; and therefore is a Proper Cause to the Effect it produces . Distinct Essences have Distinct Powers ; and , those Powers , when pusht forwards by Motion must actually work on their Immediate Patients ; and this , according to the Nature of their several Essences . Every Thing , except the First Cause , is an Effect ; and , as no Effect can be without Something to effect it , so no Determinate , or such an Effect , can be , without a Determinate , or Proper Cause . ] Thus is the Course of GOD's Providence in administring the World , shown to be ( a● becomes the All-wise Contriver of it , ) Orderly , Steady , Coherent , and all of a piece . From these Footsteps of the Divine Wisdom imprinted on Creatures , we gain all our Science ; either proceeding a priori from Proper Causes to their Proper Effects , or a posteriori from Proper Effects to their Proper Causes ; only which ways of Discoursing can beget True Science . Whence the Cartesians who decline that Method ; and , contrary to all Logick and Common Sense , ( which oblige us to argue from what 's better known , to what 's Unknown or less known ) instead of proving their Theses from the Nature of Things , do introduce Arbitrary and Voluntary Reasons for Effects ; and to palliate their Ignorance , pretend that GOD Wills such or such an Effect should follow , which Will of his they neither prove nor can prove , nor go about to prove : And when their Arguments are Destitute of Connexion , they put GOD to Annex one thing to another , as their Necessity , when they are at a Non-plus , requires ; such Men I say , who affect this way frequently , and advance many Wild and Unprov'd Suppositions at their pleasure gratis , are hence convicted to be no Philosophers ; but to obstruct the Common Road to Science ; and seem to bid Defiance to all Principles , Connexion , and Common Logick ; sham all Philosophy and Science too ; and set up in their stead , a Gentile Farce of Witty , Groundless , and Unconnected Talk. But to leave them and return to our own Doctrine , and the consequences of it ; Hence , with an easie Reflexion , may be gather'd , how all Truths are necessarily in one another , as links in the same Chain of Causes ; and , therefore , may all be seen at once by the Soul , when she comes to enjoy the Priviledge of a Pure Act , is above Time , and no longer ty'd to the slow Motion of Corporeal Phantasms in performing ●er Operations . Having thus laid open the Deviations of other Mistaking Speculaters , let us , my Soul , recommended to our Self , and to our Readers to take heed lest we run counter in our Practice to the Truth we which have Evinced and Establisht . Since then all Nature and Evident Reason consent to tell us , that every Essence has such an Operation as is Peculiar and Prop●r to it 's Nature , and our Essence is Rationality ; let not us be guilty of that worst Singularity , to act contrary to our Essence , and degenerate from our Nature by acting ▪ Irrationally , and this in the Highest Degrce . The Chief Powers of our Rational Being are our Understanding and our Will. The Primary Operation of the First is to see or know TRUTH , and that of the later is to pursue GOOD : And Metaphysicks has Demonstrated to us clearly , that nothing but the Knowledge of an Infinite Truth can satisfie the One , and the Possession of an Infinite Good satiate the other ; as also that neither of these can possibly be had save only in the Unveiled Sight of the First-Being , the Glorious and Glorifying DEITY . Let it then be our not only Principal , but ( in Comparison ) Only care to cultivate those Dispositions of our Will , which we have Demonstrated to be the only Steps by which we may ascend to Eternal Happiness ; and to r●●t out th●se Inordinate Affections for Creatures , which indispose us for Heaven ; and , consequently , after they have turmoil'd and vext us here , must render us , after this short life , Eternally most miserable : To this end , let us make that use of our Understanding , as , by due consideration , to advance these Speculative Knowledges we ●…ve gain'd here , into conformable Practical Iudgments , or Virtuous Affections . Which , as it was the Chief Intention of the Author , so it shall be ●●s Prayer it may work that Best Effect upon his Readers . A Rational Explication OF THE MYSTERY OF THE MOST BLESSED TRINITY . The PREFACE . 1. HAVING , as I hop't , settled the Way of Exact Reasoning in my METHOD to Science ; and reduced the Notions , of which we make use in more Sublime Subjects , to a Distinctness in my METAPHYSICKS ; I cast about to find out some Particular Point , to which , as a Proper Instance , I might apply my Speculative Productions ; and , thence , manifest that they were not high-flown Fancies , as some incompetent Readers may imagine , but Solid and Useful Truths . Nor could there need any Long Enquiry to make my Thoughts come to a Determination . I had , to my great trouble , observ'd how rudely the Mystery of the most B. Trinity had been attackt of late by some Witty and Fanciful Gentlemen ; and had received Information also , that the Boasts of their wonderful Performances by the way of Reason , had given great Advantages to Deists and Atheists ; who , siding with them , did thence take occasion to ridicule Christianity , whose prime Fundamental , was ( as they pretended ) a piece of Pure Nonsense . I saw very clearly , that all their Objections proceeded upon most gross Mistakes ; and ( which I am loath to say ) from Unskillfulness in Logick , or the Rules of Right Reasoning ; and from perfect Ignorance in Metaphysicks : The former of which , by Distinguishing exactly our several Notions or Respects , is to give us Light to know what is truly a Contradiction , what not ; and the other , instructs us how we are to discourse of the First Being and his Attributes . The Principles and Deductions in which Sciences being in so high a Degree Evident , I could not but discover clearly , and therefore , ( the weight of the Circumstance requiring it , ) I dare confidently declare , and offer to maintain , that all their Objections against that Mystery are not only perfectly Groundless , but when they come to be sifted and examin'd by those Tests of True Reason , extreamly Weak even to Childishness . 2. And , indeed , they deliver those Objections of theirs in so sleight a Manner , as if themselves made account they writ to none but half-witted Readers ; who stand ready to give up their Assent , upon every Pretty and Plausible Saying that surprizes their Ignorance , or pleases their Fancy . ●or , not so much as One Principle do they lay ; ●or observe any steady Tenour in Deducing any Determinate Conclusion . Nay , they do not so much as Distinguish exactly those Notions which belong to the Subject in Dispute , much less Define them ; nor state the Question liquidly and clearly ; but fall to work hastily , propose the Point crudely , and descant upon it superficially , confusedly , and ●amblingly ; only they take care to use some little Wit in the Expression : As if they presum'd , that either there are no Praecognoscenda , requisite to explicate or Determine such a Sublime Point ; or else , that every ordinary Reader knows them by ●nstinct , already . Now what Man of Sense can they hope to satisfie by such a shallow way of Discoursing ; much less the Learned Divines of the Universities , to whom they take the Boldness to address their Pamphlets . Certainly , when the Thesis is of so Soveraign a Nature , we ought , if ever , proceed with all the Accuracy Imaginable . Nor does only the Intrinsick Merit and Weight of the Subject in hand demand this of them , but also the care of their own Reputation obliges them to it . 3. For the Point it self is of that Vast Concern , that either it must ( in case it be True ) render the Deniers of it most Ungrateful , Impious and Blasphemous , in Degrading our Infinite GOD , Blessed for evermore , who , to save Mankind , so mercifully condescended to take our Nature upon Him , into the Abject condition of a meer Creature , made of Nothing , and therefore Next to Nothing ; or else , if it be , ( as they pretend ) False , it must lay the Horrible Blemish of being Idolatrous in the Highest Degree , upon the Christian Church for so many Ages : Nay , farther , it must Unchurch her absolutely , and make her no better than a Synagogue of Sathan ; since she builds the main Body of all her Faith on the Profession of Christ's Divinity ; whom she adores daily and most Devoutly ; and this , not with a Relative but a Terminative Divine Worship ; nay makes Him the Alpha and Omega , the First Beginning and Last End of all things . Whence follows , that the most Loose Lati●ndinarian cannot , with any show of Sense , clap both these two Parties , Ours , and Theirs , i●to one Compound Christian Church . 'T is true , we do both of us acknowledge the Word [ CHRIST ; ] but the Thing we mean by that Word or the Sense of it , as it is taken by us both respectively , is as Infinitely Distant as is the Meaning of those words [ GOD ] and a [ meer Man , ] or those of a Creatour and a Creature ; and certainly , Faith , signifying our Tene●s , is not a meer Sound , but Sense . I say not this to widen any Breaches , which I have been ever ready and zealous to close and heal ; but to let the Anti-Trinitarians see how vast a Division they have made in the Christian Church ; or rather , how absolutely they have by Schism and Heresie cut off themselves from it : And no Balm of Charity , or Surgery of Discipline , are able to cure such wide Wounds , or re-unite such Members to the Body , which are not only Separated from a Vital Communication with it , but Mortify'd by Obstinacy . For the True Church of Christ acknowledges no Other Means , nor any other Name under Heaven , by which she hopes for Salvation , but that of Iesus Christ , GOD - and-Man ; which these Men do utterly re●●unce and abominate . 4. I am not to doubt , but divers of those Gentlemen who impugn this Article of Christian Faith ●●ant well ; nothing being more contrary to my Genius , than to pass Judgment upon Men's Intentions when I see not their Hearts . Wherefore , I am to hope , that since they have appeal'd to the Way of Reason , they will submit the Tryal and Decision of their Cause to the Umpire Themselves have chosen . Which if they please to do , I dare assure my Readers it will be impossible the Controversie should hover , or be long Depending . I have set them a Sample what Method they may take , if they sincerely and impartially aim at Truth . To this end , I lay my Principles ; which I will vouch and maintain to be Evident , and far from Gratuitous Suppositions . I state the Question ; I clear the words , of which we are to make use , from Ambiguity ; and , by this means , I make a Clear Stage for both Parties : Let them do the same , and it will be impossible that Endless Wrangle should defeat the Expectation of our Readers , or the Victory of Truth hang long in Suspense . 5. If any blame me for being too Exact : First , I am not asham'd to declare , that it was my Full Intention to bend my utmost endeavours to settle this Point so Unanswerably , as far as it depends on the Way of Reason , that the Opposition against it may never rise again to pester and divide the Church , nor prejudice the Eternal Salvation of Mankind . Next , I must own , that it is Uneasie to me , when I am to maintain any Truth , not to lay my Principles first , and take care they be Evident : And , unless I do this , I am still dissatisfied with my self ; and afraid lest some Plausible Fancy should lead me astray from the Truth , and make me stumble into some Errour . The greatest Wits and most Learned Scholars living are liable to fall , if they want these Supports ; which , and only which , can enable our Reason to take Firm Steps , and keep it on it's Leggs Upright . Whence if be a Fault , I hope it is a good one : At least , I have been since my riper years , so enur'd to it , that I must confess I cannot help it ; nor would I , if I could . 5. Indeed , were there none that Impugn'd Reveal'd Faith , it would be Needless in that case to be at the Expence of so much Time and Pains to Defend it . It would argue a Quarrelsome and Vapouring humour , in any Man , to begin a Polemical Contest when none oppos'd him ; and in a Bravado to arm himself Cap-a-pee , and bid Defiance to all the World when he has never an Enemy . In such a Happy State of the Church , Christian Faith would descend peaceably and undisturbedly , there being none who oppos'd it ; and all Disputes about it would be superseded , or rather prevented . But , when ( as is our Unhappy Condition ) Witty and Acute Men do exert their utmost Efforts , and employ all the Skill , Art and Learning they are Masters of , to overthrow the most Fundamental Articles of Christian Faith ; and Others make use of their Errours and Objections , to subvert the Whole Body of Reveal'd Religion ; and pretend to maintain that the most Sacred Truths which GOD Himself has told us , are Perfect Nonsense , Lies and Contradictions ; 't is a most necessary Duty in us to make use of the Maxims of Right Reason to confute their Paralogisms , and to apply the most Solid and Deep Principles of True ●…rning , to baffle the Attempts of that Vain and ●…allow Philosophy , which they make us of to ●…ack those Divine Oracles . None can show ●●●t Faith is not Contradictory to Reason , ( which is ●hat's objected ) but by using those Knowledges which show it is Conformable to it . And , since Faith cannot explicate Faith ; it must either be Explicated , that is , ( in our case ) Defended by the Clear Principles of Reflecting Reason , ( or by True Philosophy ; ) or it cannot , by the way of Reason , be Defended at all . 6. Each single word in which Faith was deliver'd , must , indeed , have been Clearly Intelligible to the Faithful , and enable them to know what it is they are to believe . But a Believer and an Explicater are very Distinct Things . The former has no more to do but to submit to an Authority which he either knows or judges will not deceive him ; pretending no Skill or Knowledge , more than to understand the bare signification of the words in which Faith is conceiv'd ; But an Explicater is to use all the Skill and Art he has to show the Points of Faith Agreeable to such Other Truths as indifferent Mankind admits ; at least , such as he can , by Dint of Reason , force his Adversary to grant ; that , so , he may comfort and strengthen Faith , and make it more Lively and Operative in the Hearts of the more Intelligent Believers ; and withall , Defend it from being Opposite to Right Reason , against the Cavils of Unbelievers who impugn it upon that score . But the main Advantage which an Explicater of Faith , who follows the Principles of True Reason , or True Philosophy , will gain by this Exact way of Discoursing , is this ; that , Let him settle his Principles first , and show them to be Evident ; Let him state the Question clearly , and explain the Meaning of the Terms or Words , which concern that Question , or are made use of in Discoursing of it ; and then applying them to the Point in hand , show it's Consonancy to those Principles ; ( all which I shall here endeavour ; ) and , when he has done this , let him peremptorily Challenge his Adversary to take the same Decisive Method to prove his Negative Tenet ; and it will quickly appear , that the Maintainer of Falshood ( his Cause not bearing such a Test ) will either decline this only-satisfactory Manner of Discourse ; in which case , he will , in effect , plainly confess that what he maintains is not True ; Or , if he happens to be so Adventurous as to Attempt it , his Principles will easily be seen to be so Unlike what they pretended to be , and so Unworthy that Name , that all Men of Sense will quickly discern that his Cause has only Superficial Fancy , and not True and Solid Reason to support it . SECT . I. Preliminaries Fore-lay'd , as Principles , to the Explication of this Mystery . § . 1. Pr●● . I. CLearness being the most necessary Qualification of all others for an Explication , we are first to reflect , that All our Clear and Distinct Knowledges of any thing whatever depend on this Principle , that Our Soul works by Abstracted or Inadequate Conceptions ; which she frames , or ●as , of the whole Thing . This is granted , I think , by all Men of Learning ; and is , in a manner Self-Evident . For , let us take any Whole Thing , v. g. an Orange ; and we may find that we make many Several Conceptions of it , viz. That it is Round , Yellow , Heavy , Juicy , &c. which tho' they all belong Intrinsecally to that one Thing , and therefore we mean them all Confusedly when we name That Thing ; yet , we cannot discourse Clearly and Distinctly of any one of them , while we conceive them as Ioyn'd with great Multitudes of others , no , not so much as with one of those Others . For , how can we know that Object Distinctly which is not Distinct it self , as being not yet Distinguisht . Now , 't is only our Understanding that Distinguishes it into those Distinct Parts or Inadequate Conceptions of it . Wherefore , we cannot Discourse of any Thing Clearly , or Distinctly , until we have first represented it to our Minds with such a Distinction , by making many Distinct , Abstracted , or Inadequate Notions of it . 2. Prel . II. Having found or made those Inadequate Conceptions , we are next to Discourse consequently of each of those Considerations of the Thing , without mingling them with Others . For to what end should we Distinguish our Notions in order to discourse Clearly , if we do not keep them Distinct ; but , by Confounding them afterwards , Distract our Thoughts , and draw them ( in despite both of Nature and Art ) into Different Considerations at once ; which must needs hinder us from seeing any one of them Clearly ? Whence all the most Exact Discoursers do carefully observe and follow this Rule . For , the Mathematicians treat of Bodies as Long , ( or of Lines ) without considering them , at the same time , as Broad ; and of their Breadth , without considering them as Deep , or according to all the Three Dimensions ; tho' , in Nature , no One of them is found without all the rest : And , in case they did otherwise , their Discourses could never proceed endways , nor be Clear and Evident ; being , indeed , in that case , nothing but a meer Ramble from one Question to another , while they speak sometimes of one , sometimes of Another Notion or Subject . 3. Prel . III. Therefore , when we Affirm and Deny , according to Different Abstract Notions , there can be no show of a Contradiction . For these Abstract Notions being Different Respects , according to which we conceive the Thing diversely ; and , the weakest Logician , and every Man of Common Sense , being so wise as to know that there cannot possibly be any Contradiction unless we Affirm and Deny , according to the Same Respect ; ●…hing can be more Weak than to pretend , 〈…〉 in such a case , there is the least show of a ●…tradiction . 4. Prel . IV. Hence one of those Respects or Consi●●●ations of the Thing may be Deny'd of the other ; 〈…〉 which is Equivalent , ( all our Predications when we speak True , being of the Thing ) the Thing ●● consider'd according to One of those Respects , ●ay be Deny'd of it self consider'd according to Another Respect . V. G. The Same Man may be both a Father and a Son ; but that Same Man as ●● is a Father , is not that Man as he is a Son. Otherwise ( the Abstractive Particle [ as ] cutting ●● that precise Respect from all Others ) it would ●●llow , that the Notions of Father and Son are the ●ry Self-same Notion or Respect . Whence we ●●e oblig'd to affirm , that That Man as he is a Father , is some way Different from Himself as he ●●● Son , or according to some Notion or Respect , viz. That of Relation : Tho' he be still the same according to the Notion of Ens or Thing , that is ▪ the same Man. 5. Prel . V. Tho' the Truth of the Propositions , or Points of Faith are made known to us by Supernatural Means , or by Revelation ; yet , each single word , in which they were deliver'd or Preacht at first , must be such as was in use then and there , to signifie our Natural Notions . This is very Evident : Because , unless Faith had been deliver'd o● Preacht to the First Faithful in such Language a● every one understood , or , as suted with their Natural Notions , the Hearers having as yet no Notions but what were Natural , could not have understood what had been told them , nor could have known what it was they were to believe . By [ Natural Notions ] I mean those which we have by Direct Impressions on the Senses ; or by such Reflexion as the Generality of Mankind naturally have . Tho' this be True , and Faith was thus de●●ver'd at first , yet it does not follow that an Explicater may not be allow'd to use some words of Art ; since he writes to Learned Men. 6. Prel . VI. Hence , those words being Proper to express Men's Natural Notions , which they had from Creatures , to signifie which they were Agreed on , and Us'd by Mankind in that place ; it follows , that when we apply them to the Divine Nature , they must be , in some sort , Metaphorical , or Transferr'd thence to GOD. This is equally Evident as the Former . For , since their Sense and Meaning which Men impos'd on them at first , and , in which they Us'd them all along , was some Created Being or Perfection ; 't is manifest , that That was their First or Proper Signification ; and , consequently , if they Apply'd them to GOD afterwards , ( without which , as was shown we could not speak of GOD at all , nor know any thing of Him ) they must necessarily be Transferr'd from Creatures to GOD ; which is to be Metaphorical . 7. Prel . VII . Yet , when Divines apply such Words to GOD , whom they hold to be Infinitely Perfect ; they cannot be thought to Intend to Transfer them to Him , together with the Imperfection found in Creatures which is annext to their First Signification ; and , consequently , ( Intention and Meaning being the same Sense , ) they cannot mean to apply them otherwise than as devested of their Imperfections : So that the Meaning or Signification of those Words , thus Apply'd , debars all those Imperfections from being any ●art of our Notion , when we thus apply them . ●uch are the Imperfections of Corporeity , and 〈…〉 Notions which arise from Matter , or belong 〈…〉 it : As also all Limitedness ; which , tho' Essen●ial to Creatures , is Repugnant to the Divine Nature . 8. Prelim. VIII . Hence all such Words , thus understood , notwithstanding their Metaphoricalness , are Truly said of GOD. For , since by § . 7. we do not Intend to Transfer to GOD what is Imperfect in the Notion or Meaning of these Words , but only what signifies some Perfection ; ●nd All Perfection must be Truly attributed to Him who is Infinitely Perfect ; it follows , that all such words , thus understood , are Truely Apply'd to the Divine Nature . Thus , when our Saviour CHRIST ●● call'd , [ The Lamb of GOD , ] or , [ The Lyon of the Tribe of Iudah , ] we do not take or understand those Words under any other Notion signify'd by [ Lamb ] or [ Lion , ] than under those of Meekness and Fortitude . Thus , when Metaphysicians apply to GOD , Mercy , Justice , Power , Wisdom , &c. which , as found in our Understanding , are Distinct Formalities , of which One is not the other ; they , being well aware that the Divine Nature is One most Simple Formality , which includes and verif●es all those Attributes , do therefore strip them of that Limitation or Imperfection when they apply them to GOD ; and do not intend to signifie they are thus distinct in GOD as they are in our Understanding ; but they only mean that such Effects do proceed from GOD as do proceed from a Just , Mer●iful , Powerful or Wise Man ; which is most cer●ainly True. Which Rule , and Reason , obtains in all other Metaphorical Expressions , or in all our Words whatever , us'd by us when we speak of GOD. 9. Prel . IX . For the same Reason all Words which , amongst us , conno●ate Motion , as all Active Verbs and Verbals do , must be understood of the Action formally as Terminated , or of the Terminus of an Action , and must be explicated and understood to mean [ is . ] For , since GOD is a Pure Actuality of Being , and his Essence is Self-Existence ; nothing can be more Opposite to His very Essence , than is the Notion of Motion , which essentially imports both Potentiality and Change ; as consequently ; does our Natural Notion of Action that goes along with it . Wherefore , all Notions that import that a Thing is in fieri , must be remov'd from GOD as far as is possible , and only those Notions that signifie it is in facto esse , can with any Sense , be apply'd to that Sovereign Being . Now , this Abstraction from Motion can mean nothing but [ Being , ] one way or other , or it cannot be transferr'd to GOD , ( by Prelim. VII . ) Wherefore , when we say the Son proceeds from the Father , it can only in rigour mean [ Est a Patre . ] The properest meaning of which word , is , that GOD is in His Divine Knowledge as His own Object . And for the same Reason , all Verbs signifying the Time Past or Future are to be remov'd from GOD , and only those which signifie the present Time can be apply'd to Him : For , since whatever is in Divinis , or is Intrinsecal to GOD , is Eternally such ; we shall put Past and Future , which are Differences of Time , in Eternity . But , above all , those words that import or hi●t Efficiency are the most Unfit to be Transferr'd to GOD ; For , since Efficiency is impossible to be conceiv'd without an Effect , it puts something in GOD which is Effected or Caus'd ; nor can such a Word 〈…〉 Notion be depur'd from it's most Gross Imperfection as other Notions may . Nor will that weak Distinction of Formal and Virtual Efficiency in Di●inis serve the turn ; for this is the same as to say GOD is virtually Imperfect , or , that some Notion we have of GOD , and is verify'd by Him , is virtually an Effect ; that is , virtually Not Self Existent ; and , consequently , virtually not GOD , but a Creature . Indeed , our homely Language ; and Low Notions , do oblige us to use such words as , amongst us , do signifie Action ; but they are all to be understood , cum grano salis , as is here declar'd . Nor ought it to be objected , That these Active words cannot signifie a Terminus put , or that the thing is done ●●stantaneously , which some may think is against the Notion of Action ; for Creation is granted to be an Action , yet it is never , for so much as for one Instant , in fieri , or a doing , being in one Instant in fecto esse , or done . 10. Prel . X. For which Reason , that we may avoid all hint of Agency , which ( since whatever Acts , must act or do Something , which is it's Effect ) does necessarily induce Efficiency ; a word or Notion directly Opposite to whatever is in GOD who is Self Existent ; we shall , in our Explication , make use of the Inexistency of the Divine Nature Known , in it's self as a Knower of it , after the manner of a Form , as it were ; which is both peculiar to a Spiritual Nature , and has nothing in it of that Gross Imperfection , to which our Natural Notion of Action is liable , which , amongst us is always accompanied with Motion : Whereas , the Other implies no Imperfection at all either in the Knower or the Thing Known . For even amongst us , the Object , ( v. g. an Animal ) loses nothing , nor is less Perfect , for being Known by us ; but is in it's self , the same Unchang'd Being it was . Or rather , Intelligibility being one of the Properties of Ens , by being Naturally Known or understood , it becomes by this means ( in some Sense ) Actual ; whereas , before it was only Intelligible , that is , Potential in that respect . Nor are we the worse by Knowing it , or having the Object thus in our Knowing Power , but evidently Better , in regard all Actual Knowledge is our Natural Perfection . Add , that this way of Inexisting does not necessarily induce any Passiveness in the Subject in which the Object thus Inexists . For Angels and Souls Separate have ( as has been demonstrated ) all Created Being in them Intellectually ; and yet are not , in reality , Passive by receiving them , having no Passive Principle , or Matter , in them . Thus the Essences of all Creatures did Inexist in the Divine Understanding from Eternity : Yet none will say , this infers any Passiveness in GOD. Indeed while our Soul is in this State , she , as being the Form of the Body , is thence in some sort Passive , because the Suppositum , the Man , is such ; but when she is a Pure Spirit , her Knowledges are not then beat into her ( as it were ) by so many dints of the Object , but are in her purely by the Formal Inexistence of all Created Truths in one another . By which is s●en , that , for the Object Known to be thus in the Knower after the manner of a Form , argues no Imperfection in either of them ; and therefore is with good reason Transferrible to GOD. Perhaps some may think , that the subject is , in this case , a kind of Matter in respect of the Form ; and that this argues Imperfection . But they err in the whole business ; a ●orm that aduenes to a Material Subject , and Intrinsecally Determines it , as Modes or Accidents do , does indeed induce Imperfection , for it smells rank of Materiality or Corporeity ; but it is quite otherwise here . For Modes or Accidents have no Being but by means of their Subject , whereas the Things which are known by us , have their own proper Existence out of our Soul , notwithstanding the Intellectual Manner of Being they have in it . Their Essences , and that which is in them , are ●ngrafted on her Nobler Stock of Being , not as an Intrinsecal part of its peculiar Nature ; to which they owe their Being , but as Another thing , or as Distinct from it ; so that both the peculiar Essences of the One and the Other , are the same Essentially and Intrinsecally ; tho' the being of the Soul is Enlarged and Perfected by having Another Being tackt to it , as an Extrinsecal Form , or by her being or becoming Another ; in which ( as Aristotle , and Evident Reflexion , tells us ) all Knowledge consists . There is a Conceit current amongst many Philosophers , that every Spiritual Operation is an Action ; and hence they may mean to Transfer such a Spiritual Action to GOD ; But they are in a great Errour . Indeed , our Formal Iudging and Discoursing may be call'd Actions , because they are found in our Soul while in the Body ; and have Succession in them , being accompanied by the Motion of the Phantasms , without which the Soul in this State cannot operate ; but Pure Acts , have no such leasurely progress of their thoughts ; nor do they Compound or Divide their Notions as we do here , but all their Knowledge is by Simple Intuition , which has nothing of Succession or Motion in it ; and therefore , this sort of Spiritual Operation only , is that which can be Apply'd to GOD ; the Other , which is Part after Part , being in some respect Quantitative or Corporeal , that i● , most Imperfect . Now , if we take away the State of Motion , there is no Notion left us but that of Being . Whence all Knowledge that is purely-Spiritual must be explicated by Being , or the Inexistence of the Object in the Knower , as a kind of Form which makes the Knower be that Thing which is known , ( in case the Knower be a Created Being , ) because 't is the Form , which , according to our Natural Notions , constitutes a Thing in Being such or such . Whence such an Operation sutes not with our Natural Notion of Action , which does necessarily ( at least ) connotate Motion ; but is better exprest by a Neuter-Active Verb , such as are Stupeo , ardeo , and such like ; which signifie , that the Affection of Amazement or Burning is in me as a kind of Accidental Form ; for 't is in this manner the words , [ I know ] signifie that the Object is in my Knowledge ; and therefore , such a kind of Inexistence of the Object in the Knower , may without scruple be Transferr'd to GOD ; for 't is our greatest Spiritual Perfection , and indeed the very Notion of Knowing ; so that whoever denies this to be in the Divine Nature , must at the same time deny him to be Knowing . For these Reasons , I do judge , that in explicating this Mystery , we ought to decline the using any Notions that imply or cannotate Agency and Action , and to make use of those which have ●●e Conception of a Form , which constitutes the to be such or such . A farther Reason may be , because Essence , Self-Existence , Subsistence , Personality , which we must necessarily attribute to GOD , ( and , indeed , all Abstract Words whatever ) have that manner of Signification . 11. Prel . XI . Because , in discoursing of this Mystery we shall only make use of such Notions as belong to the Common Heads of Substance and Relation , ( or rather , speaking of it as in GOD , of Relatum esse ) 't is our Duty to set these two Kinds of Notions in as Clear a Light as we can . To begin then with Substance . A Natural Thing or Ens , call'd also an Individuum , or Substantia Prima , ( only which do exist in Nature , and , consequently , from which only we have all our Natural Notions ) does give us these Distinct or Abstracted Conceptions of it . To take them in Order , and consider , in the First place , what 's most Potential and Imperfect in a Thing ; we can conceive , that ( it being Mutable ) there can another Natural Thing be made of it ; and therefore , that it has in it somewhat by which it has a Power to become Another Thing ; which Power we call Matter : For we call that MATTER , of which any Thing is made . Now , this meer Power to be a Thing , cannot be held , by Virtue of that Sole Notion , to be a Thing ; since nothing is that which it is only a Power to be ; and if it be not , as thus conceiv'd , a Thing , it cannot be conceiv'd to have any Accident , Mode , or ( which is the same ) Determination of Thing in it , which are Subsequent to the Notion of Thing , for all these are apt to Determine the Thing , which is against the Notion of a meer Power , which is utterly Indeterminate : Hence is seen clearly why Aristotle gave this exact Description of this Matter , or Power to be , [ viz. That which is , Nec Quid , nec Quantum , nec Qu●le , neque aliquid aliud eorum quibus Ens determinatur . ] Proceeding still forwards ; we may conceive this Individual Thing , according to That in it , which so Determines this Power call'd Matter , as to Individuate it ; or so distinguish it as to make it This , and no Other : Which we have shown in our Metaphysicks is perform'd by such a Complexion of Accidents as is found no where but in It ; which therefore is it's Substantial or Essential Form ; whence it becomes properly , or in the First Sense of that word a Thing , or as Logicians call it , an Individuum . And , because nothing in Common can exist , but only what 's thus Ultimately Determin'd , it is justly conceiv'd to be Capable of Existing , or Possible to be , which is to be an Ens , or to have in it the Nature or Notion of what we call by that word . The next Consideration that occurs to us in the Order of our Natural Notions is the Act of that Power , viz. [ Existence , or Actual Being ; ] whence we denominate it Existent ; of which State , ( as it were ) of Ens we can only say this , ( for to define Existence is impossible ) that 't is then put Extra Causas , meaning by those words [ Causa Naturales . ] For , while the Operation of these Causes was yet Determining , or , ( as we may say ) Molding or Shaping the Matter ; so long the Ens or Individuum was Potential , in fieri , or within the Power of those Causes ; but when they had once brought that Determination to Perfection by Distinguishing it from all others , or making it This , and had by that means Fitted it for Existence ; they having now done their best , had no more to do ; but the First Being puts the last hand to ●…ir Imperfect Workmanship , and gives it to 〈…〉 or be Actually ; whence it is now said to be ●…ra causas Naturales , and only under GOD's ●●wer ; who as the First Ens , and a Pure Actua●…y of Being , gives and conserves to all his Creatures their Existence , or makes them be Actually . But still , the bare Notion of [ Existent , ] does not express or signifie that that Thing does Exist [ Alone , ] or without the Assistance of Another . For the Quantitative Parts in an Element , the Natural Parts in a Mixt , the Metaphysical Parts , ( or , as we call them , Secundae Substantiae , ) in an Individual Brute or Man , lastly , the Modes or Accidents do all of them , some way or other , Exist ; For who can say that the whole Exists , and yet the Parts of which that whole consists , do not at ●●● Exist ? 'T is most Evident then , that we do still want Another Notion , and Another Word to Conceive and Express a farther Perfection in the Line of Substance , than meer Existence affords us , viz. the Notion of Existing [ Alone , ] which none of the other , tho' some way Existent , had ; for Parts cannot exist , but in the Whole , nor Accidents but in the Substance . Now this more-perfect Notion , which is yet wanting to couceive it Existing Alone , we call Subsistence ; with which Formality when the Thing is once endow'd , it is justly conceiv'd to have all the Perfection in the Line of Being , which our Natural Notions can attribure to it . And hence it is truly conceiv'd to have a Power to make others , ( whether Parts or Modes ) to Exist ; which otherwise , or without Dependence on this SUBSISTER , or Reference to it , ( that is meerly by virtue of their own Notion , ) could not be conceiv'd to be at all . Now the Thing as it is Subsistent , is that which Learned Men agree to c●●● a Suppositum ; and which , if it be an Intellige●● Being , our Common Language , in correspondency to our Natural Notion , calls a PERSON ▪ That the Natural Notion of Subsistent and Person ▪ are distinct from ▪ that of [ Existent , ] is evident from the Vulgar and Unanimous Use of those Words . For , let an honest Country-Fellow be ask'd how many Things , or how many Persons , are in such à Room ; he will not reckon Parts or the Model ; but the whole Things , and the Intelligent Animals , ( which only do properly Exist of themselves , or Alone , that is , which subsist . ) And yet they will , if put to it , acknowledge that both those Parts and those Modes do some way Exist ; Wherefore , 't is Evident , that he meant to reckon only those which Subsist , or Exist Alone , and not what he thought did exist by means of Another . So that 't is plain , he has naturally in his Mind the Distinction of Existent and Subsistent ; tho' , if you ask him to give an account of this Distinction between them , he will be at a plunge ; as he would be also , were he put to give an account of the Distinction of Moist , Dry , Hard , &c. For Reflexion on his Natural Notions , or Distinguishing them formally , is not his Talent : And yet he knows after his rude manner , what he means by those Words , and that there is a Distinction between those Qualities . Of what exceeding Use this Distinguishing our Notions exactly is in Philosophy , both to Discourse clearly , and to bring the Mystical and less-intelligible Language of the Schools to a Literal and Natural Sense , is left to the Judgment and Reflexion of Learned Men : What use we shall make of it in this present Appendix will be ●… hereafter . In the mean time , applying this ●…scourse to Prelim. II , III , and IV. it is hence ●…ident , that if the Notion of Subsistent be Diffe●●nt from the Notions or Respects of Ens , Essence , ●●d Existence ; there can be no show of Contra●●ction that the same thing is One according to 〈…〉 Nature , or it's Existence , and yet be Not-on● , ●●t Three , according to the Notion or Respect of ●…sistence or Personality ; because the Respect is D●●…erse ; as also why the Second Person may ●e United or One in Respect of the Personality , and ●●t Not-one , but Two , according the Respect of ●●'s Nature or Essence . 12. Prelim. XII . As for our Natural Notion of [ Relation , ] it adds no New Perfection to the Thing ●elated , and what 's in it ; but 't is the very Thing it self in our Understanding ; as it gives our ●ind the Reason or Ground of Relating it , or Re●●●●ing it to Another . For Example : The Relation of Likeness between two Things that are White , is nothing but those very Things as they have Whiteness in them ; which our Mind com●aring according to that precise Respect , and Con●●dering One ▪ of them in order to the Other , apprehends there is such a Relation between them ; ●●d , accordingly , denominates them Alike . Thus the Relation of Equality between two things , each ●● which is a Yard Long , is nothing but the Things which have that Quantity in them , Common to ●oth ; which our Referring Power , comparing One of them to the Other , gains thence a Relative Notion of Equality between them , and denominates them Equal . Thus the Relation of Identity in Nature between Two Men , is nothing but those very Natures , Compar'd as aforesaid ; whence we truly conceive there is a Relation of Identity between them . Which will better appear by this , that if we ask what is the Formal Reason why one of those Things are said to be Alike , Equal , or the Same with the Other ; the Proper and Natural Answer would be , because they are both of them White , a Yard Long , or a Man ; which shows , that the [ Ratio , ] as the Schools call it , or Essence of Relation is Intrinsecal to the Thing it self , and , in reality , It. 13. Prel . XIII . Hence , tho' the Act of our Understanding is Necessary to the Referring those Correlates actually ; yet the Formal Notion [ or Ratio ] of those Relations themselves is entirely taken from what 's in those Subjects that are Related ; nor does that Act of ours enter into the Relation it self , or bear any part in it . This is very Evident ; because 't is not the Act of the Understanding , Comparing those Things , which is Denominated Alike , Equal , or the Same ; but the Things themselves which are Compar'd , or are the Objects of that Act. Whence the Act it self is no Part of the Relation , but is Extrinsecal to the precise Notion of it . As farther appears hence , that Relation is one of those Notions which are call'd Accidental Modes or Accidents , whose whole Being ( such as it is ) is to affect the Substance in their several ways , and denominate them such as they do formally make them : Since then Relation does not affect or denominate the Act of the Understanding , but the Things which that Act compares ; and , as has been often demonstrated , the Accidents or Modes are Really the Same with the Thing which they modifie ; it follows , that Relation is the Thing it self in our Minds ▪ conceiv'd consider'd , as bearing in it a Respectiveness , or ●ther as Referrible to Another . To penetrate this bet●… , we will put a kind of Parrallel in the Predica●…nt of Quality . A Pint is the same Quantity whereever it is : Yet put the same Pint of Water 〈…〉 a Round Glass it will be Round ; in a Square ●lass , and it will be of a Square Figure . Yet , both these Figures are Identify'd with the same Quantity , and the same Substance of the Water , whose Modes they are ; and 't is only the Containers and their Difference , which gives them this Different Denomination . So Whiteness in those Subjects , which are White , is Apprehended and Denominated by an Absolute Name , and they are both call'd White ; but put two such Subjects with Whiteness in them , in our Mind , which is a Comparing kind of Container , or a Comparing Power , and they come thence to be Apprehended by a Relative Notion , and Denominated by a Relative Word [ Alike . ] So that the Things themselves do give themselves this Relative Notion and Denomination of being Alike ; taking them as in such a Container as our Mind is , which is apt to consider them in order to one another , or refer them Actually . These Things consider'd , no Man of Reason can imagine , that , tho' we use the Common Word [ Relation , ] because it passes amongst Learned Men , ( as we do other Abstract Words ) therefore it means something hovering in the Air ( as it were ) without a Subject , like a kind of Idea Platonica ; or that it can be any thing but the very Thing it self which is Related . And hence it is that that most Solid and Acute Distinguisher of our Natural Notions , Aristotle , rather chuses to make use of the Concretes ; and , as he call'd the foregoing Predicaments , 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so he names Relation , 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 , that is , the Thing● Related , or as having in them the Ground of verifying a Respect to Another ; as I have noted in my Fifth Preliminary to Solid Philosophy Asserted . 14. Prel . XIV . 'T is impossible to conceive a Real Relation , without a Correlate answering to it , in case it be grounded on Action and Passion , or on the Unity of the Form ; nor to conceive such Correlates , without conceiving some kind of Particularity or Difference between them . There needs no more to evince this , but only to reflect on the Word [ Ad , ] which gives us the Notion of Relation ; and , withall , imports a Rapport or Respect to that , which ( as is evident by it's Contraposition ) is , in some Sense or other , Distinct from it , or Another . 15. Prelim. XV. The Essence of GOD not only being Self-Existence , but whatever is an Intrinsecal Attribute of Him being Eternally such ; it follows , that the word [ is ] not only gives us the true Sense of what 's Predicated of GOD , ( as is shown , Prelim. IX . ) but it must also signifie , [ is Eternally ; ] there being no Temporary or Accidental Predications of any thing that is in the DEITY . Wherefore , we must in the truest Sense , mean in all such Speeches , that GOD Eternally ( that is , from all Eternity , and to all Eternity ) is Knowing and Loving , Himself ; is Generating his Son ; is Generated ; is Proceeding from Father and Son , &c. So that the word [ is ] signifies here the most Absolute Necessity of His Being Eternally so as those Predicates import ; and not Contingently only , as the same Word [ is ] does often signifie when we Predicate or speak of Creatures . Which 〈…〉 at first amuse the Fancy , but ( as I hope ) af●●●wards upon due Reflexion , it will rectifie the ●…dgment of some Anti-Trinitarians ; who weak●… apprehending there can be no Pre-existence but 〈…〉 of Time , imagine we put some Instant when 〈…〉 Son did not exist ; and that , after he had got Existence , the Father ceas'd afterwards to communicate it to Him any longer , but left Him to stand done , as Sons do here when their Fathers Die , o● Disregard them ; and many other such Fool●●ies , with which they delude the Ignorant : Which ( as will be shown ) are abhorr'd by us , and most Absurd in a Discourse concerning the DEITY , and therefore most ridiculously objected by them . SECT . II. The State of the Question . 1 THE Divine Nature , which is the Subject of our present Discourse , may be consider'd two manner of Ways . One is , as to what GOD is in himself , as the Mysticks treat of Him ; in which Sense He Abstracts from all our Natural Notions , because He Transcends them ; and therefore He is altogether Unconceiveable and Unnameable by us in this State ; and only Intelligible by the Angels and Saints in Heaven ; to whose Intellectual Eye , purify'd from all Sinful Affections , and Dispos'd by Perfect Charity , he reveals His Blissful and Glorious Face , to be seen by a Clear and Simple Intuition . The other way is to consider Him as He is the Object of our Natural Notions ; which , having first ( as is said above ) Refin'd them from their Imperfection , we transfer to Him ; and , thence , become Enabled in some sort to speak and discourse of Him , Truly , ( tho' with some Impropriety , ) in our Low and Homely Language . 2. Since then 't is manifest that we cannot Speak or Discourse of , much less Explicate , what we cannot conceive , or of which we cannot have any Notion ; 't is Evident , that the Divinity being the subject of our intended Discourse , is to be consider'd and taken according to the Later manner , and not according to the Former , in our Discourses concerning it . This premis'd , since Faith ( by Prelim. V. ) is deliver'd to us in Words expressing our Natural Notions , the True State of the Question is this ; Whether the Divine Nature , Conceiv'd by us according to such Notions as we had from Creatures , which being depur'd first from their ImPerfections , we Apply to GOD ; does not oblige us , as we affirm of Him that He is Just , Merciful , Wise , &c. So , with Equal Reason and Truth , to affirm that He is ONE according to His Nature and Essence ; and withal , THREE according to Another Notion or Respect , which we fitly call [ Person ? ] To set this Question , and our ensuing Explication in a Clearer Light , we will divide this Entire Question into Five Distinct or Particular ones , viz. First , Whether it be not Agreeable to Rational Principles taken from our Natural Notions , to affirm that the Divine Nature does verify some One Notion that is Common ; and some Others that are Distinct or Particulars , to which that Common Notion is Apply'd ? Secondly , Whether these Particulars are not Three , and no more ? Thirdly , Whether those Three Particulars are not most fitly call'd [ Persons ? ] Fourthly , Whether those Three Persons , be not most fitly to be call'd , Father , Son , and H. Spirit . Fifthly , and Lastly , Whether the Divine Nature , notwithstanding this Plurality of Persons , is not still Perfectly and Equally One in Nature ; or , rather more , ( that is , under more Respects , ) One in it's self , than it would have been in case this Plurality of Persons had been secluded . Now , if it shall appear by our Explication , that the Affirmative of all these is Consonant to Reason working upon our Natural Notions stript of their Imperfections , and , as such , Transferr'd to GOD ; I hope it will satisfie Dissenters , comfort the Faith of those who Believe already , and convince every Intelligent Reader , that nothing can with true Reason be objected against this Divine Mystery . SECT . III. The Terms or Words , of which we make use in this Explication , clear'd from Ambiguity . 1. BY the word [ GOD ] is meant a most Actual and Self-Subsistent Being ; Infinite in His Nature and all it's Attributes . 2. By the words [ Divine Nature ] we understand the same Infinitely Perfect Being . But we are to mind the Reader once more of that which cannot be too often inculcated , viz. That in all Creatures ( for Example in Man ) there is found what answers to diverse Notions in the Line of Substance ; of which one is more Perfect ( or Imperfect ) than Another . For , an Individual Man , conceiv'd precisely under the Superiour Notions of Ens , Corpus , Mixtum , Vivens , Animal and Homo , signifies only some Common and Inadequate Notion of Him ; whence nothing in Common being able to Exist ; but only Singulars , as Peter , Paul , &c. hence all those Former are Imperfect in the Line of Ens , which signifies Capable of Existing : Yet , even these Singular or Individual Entities , tho' we should allow them in some sort to Exist , have not thence all the Completion or Perfection imaginable in that Line ; for a Thing may be Capable to Exist , and yet not Capable to exist Alone , or without the Support of Another , which we call Subsisting . To be Subsistent then , ( which in Intelligent Things we call to be a PERSON , ) being the most Perfect Notion of Ens , must be attributed to the Divine Essence or Nature ; ( tho' the word [ Essence ] does not express it , but rather signifies a●ter the manner of a kind of meer Form : ) Otherwise the Divine Nature would be conceiv'd to want something , which according to our Natural Notions is the utmost Perfection in the Line of Being ; which is impossible to be thought or said of GOD. who is Infinitely Perfect in Being . 3. By the word [ Father , ] I mean one Particular , who communicates the Nature of which Himself is , to Another Particular : And by [ Son , ] Him to whom that Nature is thus Communicated ; but that he does or does not Communicate the same Individual Nature , or that he is Before his Son in Time , and other Considerations arising from Matter , spring from the Imperfection and Limitedness of Creatures , and therefore they are not to be Transferr'd to GOD : Nor are they Essential to the Notions of Father and Son ; as will be plain to any Man , who reflects , that if ( per impossible ) a Man did communicate his Individual Nature to Another , and that Other had it thus Communicated from him , and this Instantaneously ; he would not , in that Supposition , be therefore less a Father , but more perfectly such , because the Nature Communicated is more perfectly the Same . Nor do [ Sooner ] or [ Later ] [ Instantaneous ] or [ Not-Instantaneous ] , enter into the precise Notion of Father , and Son ; as appears from the Definition of Generation ; which abstracts from all those Considerations . Moreover , 't is most Evident , that in such a case , the Person who Communicates his Individual Nature , and He to whom 't is Communicated , would have , hence , some very neer Relation to one another ; and what imaginable Relation could it be but that of Father and Son ? 4. I take the word [ Generation ] in the Sense of that Exact and Received Definition , viz. [ Processio Viventis a Vivente , tanquam a Principio Conjuncto , in Similitudinem Naturae , ] which I shall show is perfectly Verify'd in the Procession of the Eternal Word . All other Considerations are Extrinsecal and Forrein to the Notion of Generation , as may be gather'd from § . 3. and , therefore do not belong to it's precise Notion , but spring from the Imperfection of Creatures ; nor , consequently , as such , ought they be Transferr'd to GOD. 5. The word [ Person ] signifies Perseity , ( as some Schoolmen explicate it ; ) or what 's so Subsistent of it self , or by the merits of it's own Notion or Expression , that it needs no other Formal Notion to compleat it , nor Word to express it better . The Etymology of that word ( if such a Consideration , and not rather the Common Use of it only , be much to be regarded ) seems to be this ; that as we say a Speech is Dissona , when it varies from another in Sense , and Consona when it agrees to it : So a Thing is call'd Persona , when it thorowly or perfectly sounds or speaks the Notion of Ens ; or expresses the utmost Completion of a Thing under the Notion of an Intelligent Being . See § . 2. 6. [ Subsistent ] and [ Suppositum ] signifie the same , and are appliable to all Beings whatever , whether they be Intelligent ( that is Persons ) or no ; and express their last Completion in the Line of Ens in their several Kinds . The Notion of the former seems more to respect it's self , or it 's own Absoluteness in the Line of Being . The Notion of the Later regards the Nature , or the Accidents , ●hich it sustains in our Mind , or as conceiv'd by ●… . The Literal meaning of which kind of Say●ng , is , That , we making diverse Conceptions of ●he same Thing , the Formal Conception of the ●●ture , or of it's Modes , is not that Formal Conception of a Thing Existing [ Alone , ] without needing any other farther Notion in our Mind , or any other Word , to mean or signifie it's standing thus Alone or without Dependency on any other Created Noti●● to compleat or make out that Full Sense . Notwithstanding that the Notions of [ Subsistent ] ●nd [ Suppositum ] do bear such a nice Distinction ; ●●● , in regard that which sustains another , must 〈…〉 supposed able to subsist of it self ; hence they ●… , not without reason , promiscuously used . The Explication of the rest of those words of which we shall have occasion to make use , will , I conceive , come in more seasonably in their ●roper Places . SECT . IV. That the Divine Nature does Verifie some One Notion that is ( some way ) . Common ; and some Others that are Particulars . 1. SInce all Explications ( as well as Arguments ) are to be taken from the Nature of the Thing , 〈…〉 from the Subject to be Explicated ; as being , in ●●ality , nothing else but the Unfolding that Nature , and the laying open what , with a Deep Inspection , we discover to be included in it , or to belong to it Intrinsecally ; and , since the Nature of GOD , is , at present , the Subject of our Discourse ; or that which we are to explicate ; our Question being , Whether GOD is not Truly One in Nature or Essence , and Three according to the Notion of Person ? Hence , 't is most fittirg we should take our Rise , and Ground our Discourse , from the Divine Nature it self , consider'd as it is conceiv'd by us according to our Natural Notions , as is declar'd above . 2. And , because many Attributes are held to belong to the Divine Nature ; therefore to make our Explication more facil and succinct , we will pitch upon One or Two Attributes , or Predicates , which are granted by all to belong to GOD's Nature ; viz. That it is Spiritual , or that GOD is an Infinitely Perfect Spirit . 3. Moreover , seeing all we know of Spiritual Natures , or the First and most Obvious , and , withall , the most True Conception we have of them ▪ is , that they are such Beings as have Understanding and Will ; and therefore , that they do Know and Love such Objects as are proportion'd to their pitch , or Agreeable to their Natures ; we are thereupon to build our Explication on these Two Operations Proper to our Soul , and to other Created Spiritual Natures ; and thence Transfer ●hem to GOD ; which we may safely do without danger of putting any Imperfection in GOD , in regard those Attributes are the Greatest Perfection of Spiritual Natures , and even Essential to them ; so that we need no more but only abstract from them the Limitedness or Finiteness necessarily annex● to all Creatures , and conceive GOD to be Infinite under these Considerations , as is declar'd Prel . VII . 4. Farther , because that Knowledge and Love are Imperfect which are exercis'd about Unworthy Objects ; and those are most Perfect , which are employ'd about the Best and Noblest Objects that can be imagin'd ; and only the Divine Nature is the most Excellent Object : It follows , that , since no Notion that is Imperfect is to be Attributed to GOD ; Therefore the Knowledge and Love which we attribute to Him must be the Knowledge and Love of the Best of all Objects , Himself ; and thence we must affirm , without the least fear of Injuring the Divine Nature , that [ GOD Knows and Loves Himself , ] because to deny Him this , would make the Divine Nature most highly Imperfect ; nay more Imperfect than Created Spiritual Natures are ; especially if they are Pure Acts. 5. Moreover , this Knowledge and Love of Himself , is ( as it were ) the Primary Operation of the Deity , as it is a Spirit : Wherefore , since the Primary Operation of all Creatures we converse with has been prov'd to be That which constitutes their Essences ; we cannot but judge , that , considering GOD according to our Natural Notions , this Knowledge and Love of Himself , is , in that regard , most Essential to GOD as He is a Spirit . 6. This Fundamental Principle then being laid as the Groundwork of all our ensuing Explication ; since ( by Prelim. II. ) and as plain Reason tells us , we are to discourse consequently of those True Notions we have of GOD , so they imply no Imperfection ; we are to consider next what Genuine Consequences do follow from this Position . 7. It follows , then , hence immediately , that the Divine Nature does Verifie the Notions of Knower and Thing Known , Lover and Thing Loved ; and that there is in the Divine Nature that which answers to those Distinct Notions ; nay , which obliges us to say they are Distinct. For , 8. 'T is impossible to conceive , that the Notions of Knower and Thing Known , ( and the same is to said of Lover and Thing Loved ) should be the same Notion ; and not Contradistinct , and ( some way ) Opposite to one another . First , Because plain Sense manifests they are counterpos'd . Next , the Art of Logick , which is entirely Grounded on our Natural Notions , and perfectly Distinguishes them , informs us certainly that there is a Relative Opposition , and , consequently , an unavoidable Distinction between them . Thirdly , The Thing Known and Lov'd do evidently import the Object of Knowledge and Love ; and , what 's Objected cannot but be Distinct , or ( some way ) Other from That to which 't is Objected . Fourthly , they being clearly Relatives , the very meaning of the word [ Ad , ] which formally expresses all Relation , must forcibly signifie there is some sort of Distinction between them . Lastly , They are Correlatives ; which can have no Sense but this , that they mutually respect one another . Now that Knower and Thing Known should mutually respect one another , and yet there should not be ( in some Sense ) One and Another , is perfect Nonsense and meer Contradiction . 9. Hence follows , that there must be some kind of Distinction in the Divine Nature it self ; since Predicates that do necessarily bear Distinction in their very Notion are truly verify'd of it : Nor can Distinction be in any thing , but it must make it , some way or other , Distinct. 10. Nor can this Distinction proceed from the Imperfection of our Understanding , as it does when we distinguish other Divine Attributes ; but it proceeds from the Soveraign Perfection of the Divine Nature it self , which is to Know and Love Himself : Nor does our Understanding in conceiving this , deform our True Conception of the Deity but the true Conception of the Deity it self does thus Inform our Understanding , and obliges us to affirm thus of it . 11. Hence this Distinction , which those words , [ God Knows and Loves Himself , ] do put in the Divine Nature , is Real : Not only because the Divine Self-Knowledge does Verifie it ; but also , because it is not grounded on our weak manner of Conceiving it , but , as was shown , §§ . 4. 5. on the Perfection of GOD's Essence . 12. Hence , as we transfer to GOD the Notions of Justice , Mercy , Power , Wisdom , &c. which we find in Creatures , by observing such Effects proceeding from Him as use to proceed from such like Perfections in us , or among us ; so with the same , and far better Reason we may transfer to Him the Notions of Knowing and Loving Himself ; and , consequently , of Distinction between those Relative Notions of Knower and Known which are in Him , and objectively Him , by Priel . 10. 11. 13. To understand this more clearly , we may reflect that the Names of those Virtues which we Transfer to GOD do not in their Notion import that one of them is not another ; nor hinder but they may all be compriz'd in one Eminently Perfect Attribute . I believe , that I have shown , ( Solid Philosophy Asserted , Reflection XV. ) that all Virtues , even amongst us , are comprehended in that one Notion , [ Right Reason ] working on such or such Objects , in such and such Occasions . Much more easily may they all be center'd in that one most Perfect Formality of GOD's Essence : Whence all the Distinction of those Attributes as they are in GOD , must necessarily be refunded into our manner of conceiving them by diverse Acts , or Abstracted Conceptions . But now , when we conceive that GOD Knows Himself , ( and the same may be said of his Loving Himself ) the business is quite otherwise . For the very Notion of [ Self-Knowledge ] does essentially import Distinction of Knower and Known . Even Knowledge , amongst ▪ us , does essentially signifie , that the Thing Known is in our Knowledge as Another , or as Distinct from the Soul as knowing it ; as is shown in the Book now cited , Prelim. II. §§ . 22. 23. and particularly , § . 26. And Reason gives it must be so ; since when I know a Tree , the Nature of a Tree which is in my Mind intellectually , is not there as either my Essence , nor as any Intrinsecal Mode of me , as is manifest ; it must therefore necessarily be there as Distinct from me , or as Another . Nay , when our Soul knows her self , she must , some way or other , be Distinct from her self by that Knowledge ; for it cannot with any Sense be deny'd , but that she is in that case , her own Object ; and that , therefore , for that very regard , she must be distinguisht , some way , from her self as Knowing that Object , as is shown , Prelim. IV. Nor is this any Imperfection in a Created Spirit , to have her Objects in her when she knows them , as Other , or as Distinct from her : For 't is the very Notion or Nature of Knowledge , which if we take away from her , we must at the same time take away her Knowing Power , and her Spirituality , and put her to be made of Matter ; it being the Property of Matter and of Material Things to have nothing in them but such Modes which are Intrinsecal to their Subject , and Determine it's Potentiality . Nay more , 't is the highest Perfection of a Spiritual Nature to have things in it , which are different from it ; as is demonstrated in my Metaphysicks , Book II. Ch. 2. §§ . 6 , 7 , 8 , 9. Whence , there being no Imperfection in this Notion , but rather it being the best Perfection of a Spiritual Nature , we ought with far better Reason than any other , Transfer it to GOD ; and to say , that GOD , by Knowing Himself , is ( in some Sense or other ) in Himself as Another , or that He is Distinct from Himself , as he is a Knower , as is seen Prel . IV. 14. To finish this Point , we may reflect , that we may more easily be Mis-led by fancying those other Attributes to be Distinct in GOD ; because , according to our manner of Conceiving they are Diverse from one another , and very Many of them ; But in our case there are but Two single Attributes , viz. Self-Knowing and Self-Loving , and yet each of those single Attributes imports Distinction and Aliety , ( if I may use that word ) in it 's own Particular Notion . Which shows plainly , that the Distinction here spoken of , does not arise out of the Number of those Diverse Attributes , or from our Distinct Acts of Conceiving them Abstractedly ; but from each of those Single and Intrinsecal Natures or Notions of Self-Knowing and of Self-Loving ; which , unless we should impiously degrade the Divine Nature from being Spiritual , we must be forced to Attribute to Him ; and consequently , some Distinction , as these words do most evidently import . 15. Hence is farther manifested , that since GOD Knows and Loves Himself , there is in the Divine Nature some One Notion that is Common , and some Others that are Particulars . For it is Evident , that Knower , and Known , Lover , and Loved , are all distinct Notions from one another , and therefore Particulars ; as also that the word [ GOD ] is Predicated , and Verify'd of each of them . For , since all True Predication or Verification is made by the Identifying Particle [ Est , ] 't is consequent , that the Divine Nature is in them all , and really Them : And therefore , since the single word [ GOD ] is but one Notion , and truly said of them All , it must be granted to be COMMON to them all . 16. And because this Common Notion [ GOD ] cannot but most properly signifie the Divine Being , which is Infinite in Perfection ; and to be a Suppositum , ( by Sect. 3. § . 6. ) is to be Compleat or Perfect in the Notion of Ens : Therefore , the Notion of a Suppositum cannot but be attributed to that Common Notion [ GOD. ] Wherefore that Notion is not only Common , but also a Suppositum ; there is then a Common Suppositum in GOD , which is predicated of the Particulars truly attributed to Him ; and , as has been prov'd , Identify'd with Him. 17. In this Notion of the Common Suppositum , the Generality of the Jews , the Wiser Heathens , and all those who deny a Trinity , understood the word [ GOD ; ] and perhaps our selves too , when there is not in our Prayers or Discourse any Particular Reference to any of the Persons . 18. Wherefore this Common Suppositum may not unfitly be call'd the Absolute Notion of GOD , and those Particulars the Relative Notions of the same Divine Essence ; because they meerly spring from those Relations . 19. Whence , because the Common Suppositum , exprest by the word [ GOD , ] is held , by all who use that Word to be Infinite in all those Attributes , which we have Demonstrated in the Third Book of our Metaphysicks , to belong to the First Being , viz. Infinitely Wise , Just , Good , Powerful , &c. as also Eternal , and Self-Existent ; it follows , that all or each of those Particulars , which are Predicated of the Word [ GOD , ] and therefore are Identify'd with Him , must also be granted to have all those Infinite Perfections in them , which are attributed to Him ; since [ GOD , ] who includes all those Attributes is Predicated ( or Identify'd ) with them all ; as is deliver'd accordingly in the Creed of St. Athanasius . 20. The Difficulty is , how we can with Truth , and our due Regard to GOD , who is essentially a most Pure Actuality of Being , make Him a Genus or a Species , Common to more which have the Notion of Inferiours in respect of Him. For true Metaphysicks admits no Composition in GOD of Genus and Difference , as is seen , Book III. § . 35. To clear this , we are to consider all those several Manners of Predicating , given us by Porphyrius , and allow'd by all the Learned World , call'd the Five Predicables . Now the Notions of Genus and Species , which are made by Logical Abstraction , are Indeterminate and Potential in respect of the Inferiour Notions ; and the Things , ( that is , they , as thus consider'd ) are Substantiae Secundae , which reach not to the Notion of Individuum , or Substantia Prima , only which are properly Entia or Capable of Existing ; much less do they reach to the Notion of Existence , or Actual Being . This being so , it would be most absurd to Transfer such Notions to GOD who is Pure Existence . Nor can we Predicate any thing of Him as a Difference , which determines the foresaid Potentiality of the others ; for in that which is essentially Pure Actual Being , there can be no farther Determination made ; since this is done by the Act , and nothing can be more Actual than Pure Actuality of Being it self . 21. Wherefore , setting these Three Predicables aside , there remain those Manners of Predicating call'd Proprium and Accidens . Now , I conceive , that it argues no Imperfection for the Common Suppositum to be Predicated of those Particulars , according to this Last manner . For first , This is not Abstracted from Inferiours , or Common to them as a Potential Notion Determin'd by Differences : Again , To be thus Predicated it is not requir'd that the Predicate be an Accident it self , or found in any of the Heads of those Modes , which are Contr●●istinguisht from Substance ; but the Predicate here may it self be a Substante , provided it does not per se , or essentially and formally belong to the Subject . V. g. When we say , [ a Cup is Golden , or ( which is the same ) Gold ; a Spoon is Gold ; a Ring is Gold ▪ ] the Predicate [ Gold ] apply'd to the Cup , Spoon , and Ring , is a Substance ; and , in some Sense Common to them all ; not as a Potential Notion , Determin'd by Differences , is common to it's Inferiours , and Essential to them ; but , because it does not Essentially belong to Gold to be apply'd to such a Figure , therefore it is Accidental or not - Essential to it ; and hence it is said to be Predicated of them Accidentally . Now in this manner the Common Suppositum [ GOD ] is Predicated of Knowing , Known , and the other Particulars without any show of Imperfection . I do not say , that Knowing , &c. are Accidental to GOD , as it is to things of the said Figures to be Gold. I abstract from the Matter , and take only the bare Manner of Predicating ; which is , not to be said or predicated as a Superiour of Inferiours , to which it's Potentiality is Determin'd by Differences , but as one Substantial Notion , determin'd already as to it 's own Nature , is Predicated of another , which is either ( according to it's Notion ) Substantial ; or formally belonging to Another Head ; as those Figures are in respect of Gold , and the Absolute Notion of the Divine Essence , according to the Distinction of our Natural Notions , is to that of Relation in Common . 22. Or , if we invert the Order of those Propositions , and say , [ GOD is Known , Knowing , &c. ] and so make the Notion of GOD the Common Subject in those speeches in which the Relative ones are Predicated ; then they may be truly said to be Predicated of him according to the Predicable of Proprium . Which soever of those ways we take , no Imperfection will be refunded upon GOD , nor any Potentiality transfer'd to His most Pure Actuality ; which is the chief danger to be avoided in our Predications concerning the Divine Nature . SECT . V. That these Particulars , are THREE , and no more . 1. SInce then this Common or Absolute Suppositum , call'd GOD , is justly held to be Infinite in Being ; it follows , that He has all the Positive Perfections in the Line of Ens or Substance that can be imagin'd , and possesses them all Indivisibly in One most Actual Formality of Being ; whence 't is impossible to apprehend there should be any Distinction or Plurality at all in GOD , as he is thus conceiv'd , or under that precise Notion of meerly Being ; since under that Notion He is Indivisibly One ; which farther appears hence , that even our ordinary Notion of [ Existence ] is Indivisible ; much more must it be such when it is Infinite . Wherefore , it being no less evidently shown , Sect. 4. that there are some Particular Notions , or some sort of Plurality , Truly and Rightly Transferr'd to GOD , and Verify'd of Him : This must necessarily spring from our Conceiving GOD under some Other Notion ( or some Notion that belongs to Another Head or Predicament ) than that of Substance or meer Being ; and , withall , from such a one as does not carry , along with it , when 't is Transferr'd to Him , any Imperfection to the Divine Nature . 2. Nor need we look far to find what kind of Notion this is . We can no sooner consider , that GOD Knows and Loves Himself , ( which is the Ground of all our Explication , and , as it were , the Text on which our Reason descants ) but we must forcibly and immediately discover , that this Distinction in GOD must be taken from that Head of our Notions , call'd [ RELATION . ] For the Knower cannot be a Knower of Nothing , but of some Thing or some Object , which is Known by him : Nor can that Thing or Object be actually Known , but there must be some Thing which is a Knower of it ; which shows those Notions are perfectly Relative to one another . 3. Wherefore all the Distinction and Operation , which ( as has been shown ) is Verify'd to be in the Divine Nature , and all the Distinction of the Particulars we lately spoke of , must be taken from the Relations , according to which the Divine Nature is Referr'd to its self ; and not formally and immediately from GOD ' s Essence , which belongs formally to the Line of Substance . 4. Nor need we fear to attribute Distinct and ( some way ) Opposite Predicates to GOD , and , consequently affirm that there is some kind of Distinction and Opposition in Him ; since the Distinction necessarily imply'd in that Natural Notion we transfer to Him , does attribute to Him the Highest Perfection of His Nature as 't is Spiritual ; and is not Apply'd to Him according to the Notion of Ens or Being ; but , according to Another Respect or Notion , which is Different from it ; and ( as is shown , Prel . X. and XI . ) does not induce or require any Distinction formally of the Essence it self ; Nay , when ( as will be shown , Sect. VIII . § . 7. ) that very Opposition , notwithstanding it forces some kind of Plurality , does no less necessarily infer a more perfect Unity , ( if possible ) in the Divine Nature , at least an Unity in more respects , than could have been Conceiv'd had there not been that kind of Distinction and Opposition . Nor yet can any doubt of the Truth of this Thesis , which puts Distinct and Opposite Notions in GOD ; since His Nature verifies those Distinct Notions , and Obliges us to Affirm them of Him , or Attribute them to Him. 5. Since then these Particulars , which ( as is shown , §§ . 2. and 3 ) we truly attribute to GOD , must entirely be taken from the foresaid Relations ; 't is consequent , that the Number of them also must be taken from the Number of those Relations . 6. And , 't is clearly Agreeable to Reason , that in those of the Former sort , there must be Relation on both sides ; which must , consequently , constitute , or rather Infers , Two Particulars . For , 't is very Evident from § . 2. and , indeed , is obvious to Common Sense , that ( in our case ) there is a Mutual Relation between the Knower and Thing Known ; as is exprest by those very Words ; nor can we Express them otherwise , while we must affirm that GOD Knows Himself . As will yet better appear , Sect. VII . § . 9. 7. Which is hence confirm'd , because as GOD is essentially Infinitely - Intellective or rather Intelligent ; so He must also be Infinitely - Intelligible , or rather actually Known ; otherwise there would want an Adequate Object of the Divine Understanding , which would also infer He is not Infinitely Intelligent . 8. These Relations are grounded materially and ●eally on the Divine Essence it self , consider'd , according to it 's own Notion , or as it is conceiv'd ●o be Absolute ; since 't is His Essence it self , exprest by the word [ GOD , ] which Knows and is Known , conceiv'd as apt to ground those Relations ; as it evidently is ; and not His Essence as it is conceiv'd Relatively : For a Relation cannot be the immediate Reason or Ground of Another Relation ; otherwise there might be processi●s in infinitum . But the main Reason why this cannot be , is , because it is not the Relation it self which is Referr'd , but the Thing ; and Relation must necessarily be in th●se things which are Related . 9. Wherefore , however the Divine Lover , when GOD Loves himself , cannot but have a Relation to the Thing Loved , because Love proceeds from the Goodness of the Object , and it's Agreeableness to it 's ( that is to GOD's ) Nature ; yet there is no Mutual Relation from the Thing Loved to the Lover , or to the Love of it . For the Greatest Good and Perfection of an Intelligent or Knowing Nature is Truth ; and Truth does formally consist in this , that the Object is so in the Understanding , as it is in it's self , which is in our case , that the Divine Object Known is in the Divine Knowledge , or truly conceiv'd by it : Whence Love proceeds formally , properly and immediately , from both according to their Relative Notions by which they are Distinguisht , and not from the Absolute Notion which is Common to them both . Wherefore , since by § . 9. no Relation can be grounded on another Relation , and in case there were a Mutual Relation to the Lover , it must proceed or be grounded on the Relations of Knower and Known ; it follows , that there can only be Three Relations ; and , consequently , ( by §§ . 4. and 5. as will be shown , ) but Three Particulars in the Deity ; nor can any more be attributed to it , according to our best Reason directed by True Principles , and proceeding upon our Natural Notions : That the Common Suppositum does not infer a Fourth Particular , will be seen , Sect. VI. § . 10. Corollary . Since Divine Love proceeds from this that the Object is so in the Knower as it is in it self , which is the Formal Notion of TRUTH : Hence , 't is seen , how much our Love ought to be set on Truth , which is the Natural Perfection of our Mind ; how Like GOD those Noble Souls are whose Chief Affection is addicted to Truth , especially Divine Truths : On the other side , how Ignoble , and Unlike GOD those Mean and Depraved Souls are who disregard TRUTH , and think the care of Promoting it is below their Empty Temporary Greatness . SECT . VI. That these Three Particulars are most fitly called PERSONS . 1. THE next Question is , What Natural Notion of ours does most properly fit those Three Particulars , which we have been obliged to put in the Divine Nature ; and what Word of ours does most fitly , and in the Common Usage of it , express that Notion . For , since we have granted in our Fifth Preliminary , that Christian Faith was Deliver'd at first in such Language as exprest our Natural Notions ; that is , in such as was Usual in those Times and Places , and Intelligible by the Generality in their respective Circumstances ; it cannot be deny'd but that we stand engag'd to show that our Explication must likewise observe the same Rule , as to those Words which we pretend do signifie the Point of Faith it self , as exprest in our Catechisms and Creeds . 2. To perform this as we ought , we will consider first of what Notion or Nature those Particulars must be conceiv'd to be ; and because we have no Natural Notion but either of Substance , or it 's Modes ; it follows , that those Three Particulars we speak of , must either be Particular according to the first sort of Notion [ Substance ; ] or else according to some of the Later . Wherefore , to clear this Point , and determine under which of these Notions they are Particulariz'd , we are to consider what it is that is thus Particulariz'd ; and our former Discourse shows , that it is the Common Suppositum , or that which is that Absolute Notion , we call [ GOD , ] which is here Particulariz'd , or has these Particulars in it . And , indeed , there needs no more but these words , [ God Knows and Loves Himself , ] to evince this : For it is , hence , as Evident as plain Words can make any thing , that 't is GOD who is the Knower , Thing Known , and Lover ; which Notions give us , or rather are those very Particulars we speak of : Now , since the word [ GOD ] cannot be thought to belong to , or be with any Sense , referr'd to any other of those Heads then that of Substance or Being , ( whence as consider'd in an Absolute and not in a Relative Sense , he is call'd the First Being , ) hence 't is GOD , conceiv'd under the Notion of Being or Substance , which is Particulariz'd . And , though GOD be not particulariz'd Substantially , or according to the Manner Substances are particulariz'd amongst us , which is that the Common Abstracted , Indeterminate or Potential Notions of the Genus , or Species , be Divided and Determin'd under the Notion of Ens , by means of Essential or Intrinsecal Differences , and so make more Entia , ( for this , as was said lately , cannot be said of the Pure Actuality and Unity of the Divine Nature ; ) Yet he may be particulariz'd by reason of the Relative Conceptions verify'd of Him , which we have shown do not induce any Imperfection at all : Yet , as it is only the Common Suppositum or GOD , ( taking that word in an Absolute Sense ) which is Related , so it is only what 's signify'd by GOD , ( or the Primum Ens , ) which is the Thing Particulariz'd . This being then manifest , and Particulars under the Notion of Substance , being most necessarily held to be Particular , Supposita , and , if they be Intelligent , [ PERSONS ; ] it follows that these Three Particulars , or , Suppositums in GOD are fitly and properly to be call'd Three Divine PERSONS . And , he who will deny any part of this Discourse stands obliged to show either , that there are not Three Particulars in the Divine Nature ; or , that it is not the Divine Nature under the Notion of Substance , which is the Thing Related , and thence Particulariz'd ; or that Particulars under the Notion of Substance , are not to be call'd in true Speech , Suppositums ; and , if they be Intelligent , in a vulgar word , PERSONS . He must also assign some other Notion under which we are to conceive them ; and invent some other Name , suteing with our Natural Notions , by which we may call them . And , lastly , he stands bound to answer the Reasons I have brought in my foregoing Explication for each of those Points . None of which , if he pleases to go to work like a Scholler , and not Act a Banterer and Droll , he can . I am sure , ever be able to perform . 3. This being so plain , I am sorry I must declare , that I am much dissatisfy'd that any Christian Writer , speaking of the B. Trinity , should assert that the word [ PERSON ] is now become a Term of Art : Whereas we have no word more Proper or more Usual to express a Particular Subsistent Being that is withall Intelligent , than the word [ Person ] is . For , let us ask all Mankind , and even the rudest Vulgar , how many Persons there are in such a Place ? They will candidly reckon up to us only the Men and Women , and not the Stools , Chairs , or Irrational Animals ; nor can any Man imagine , either that they answer'd thus through any Skill or Art they had acquir'd ; or that they meant to express any Artificial Conception of ours , or any thing made by an Artificer ; but that they intended to signifie by that Word , meer Natural Things , with which we were well acquainted and daily converst ; and that they , in thus answering , us'd the Ordinary Speech of all Mankind , who spoke and understood the same Language . Again , when 't is said , [ it is now become a Term of Art , ] What means the word [ now ? ] Is it us'd by Christians now in any other Sense than it was us'd by S. Athanasius , 1330 years ago ; or by the Christian Church both then , before , and ever since ? Or do our Catechisms now-a-days teach us Artificial Conceits ? For only these are fit to be exprest by Terms of Art. I would hope that Learned Man had a better meaning than those Words seem to have , and that I am Deceiv'd in him ; however , I thought fit to take notice of it lest it should Deceive others . 4. Nor ought it be objected , that the word [ Person ] is not found in Scripture . 'T is a Necessary Liberty the Christian Church ever took to declare the Faith which she had in her Heart , by more-Emphatical Words , to keep her Thoughts and Tenets from being misunderstood ; provided those Words express more fully and clearly the same Sense , as is found in the Holy Scripture ; as appears in the word [ Consubstantial ] made use of in the Nicene Creed ; tho' it be no more found in Scripture than the word [ Person ] is . 5. Yet , tho' we must put Three Persons in GOD , does not therefore follow that there are Tria ●●● or Three Things in Him. For the Proper ●otion of Ens , amongst us , is That which is Ca●●le of Existence ; whence , tho' we should de●ite that Notion from the Potentiality signify'd ●● the word [ Capable , ] which would cost us ●●me straining the signification of words ; yet ●● cannot conceive Three Entities in GOD without conceiving there are Three Existences , or ●●ther Self-Existences , in Him ; which 't is Impos●●ble there should be : For [ Self-Existence ] necessarily implies [ Infinite in Being ; ] and there can be ●o more but One Infinite in the same kind ; as has been Demonstrated in our Metaphysicks : Nor can it be said that there may be Three Relative Existences in GOD ; the Notion of [ Existence ] being the most Absolute , and most Irrespective or Unrelative that can be imagin'd . Add , That the Formal Constituent of Ens is Essence : Wherefore , ●f we put three Entia in GOD , we must also put Three Divine Essences in Him : Of which , since each must be Infinite , we shall be obliged to put Three Infinites under the same Notion : Which , seeing each must be distinct from the other ; and therefore must , to distinguish them , have some●hing in it which the other had not ; they would , consequently , limit one another ; and , so , none of them would be Infinite . Whence , it was not amiss , which an acute School Divine put in his Publick Theses ; viz. In Deo sunt Tres Entes , non Tria Entia : Ignoscant Grammatici , perpendant Th●ologi . 6. But , to give a farther Reason , why these Three Particulars in GOD cannot be said to b● Three Things or Entia , and yet must be call●● Three Persons ; and , withall to set this pre●●●● Point in a clearer Light , I discourse thus . The Common Notion of Ens or Substance is Divided and Subdivided , descending downwards by ●●trinsecal Differences , till we come at the foot of the Scala Predicamentalis , or the Lowest Notions call'd by Logicians Individuums : which are constituted and distinguish● by such a Complexion of Accidents , as is found in no other ; whence it becomes This , that is , a Substantia Prima , which only is properly a Thing ; in which the Matter being thus ultimately Determin'd , 't is hence made Capable of Being , that is , an Ens. Whereas , the Former , which were Common Notions , are not , by virtue of those Common or Universal Natures , or as thus exprest by a General Word , Capable of Existing or Entia , ( since nothing in Common can exist ) and therefore must either exist in the Substantia Prim● , or Suppositum , as Metaphysical Parts ( or Inadequate Conceptions ) of it , or not at all . Wherefore the Individuum includes all those Common Notions in it self as Parts of it's Essence ; whence they are all predicated essentially of it . Nor can our Natural Notion of Ens , be devested of this Imperfection that it is compounded of such Metaphysical Parts , which are Superiour and Inferiour in respect of one another . Whence that Notion cannot fitly be Transferr'd to GOD , in whose most Simple Essence there can be no Compositions ; no , not even that call'd Metaphysical . Moreover , were this wav'd , yet the Notion of Ens being Essentially That which has a Power to ●● ▪ it can never forego that Potentiality , nor , con●●●uently , be Transferr'd to GOD. For , were ●●● Potentiality of Being abstracted from it , it ●ould either signifie nothing that any way relates ●o Being at all ; or else it would signifie Actual ●eing or Existence . Now Existence may indeed be most fitly apply'd to GOD ; but in that case , ●●●●e the Notion of Ens and Existence are as widely Different as Power and Act , it would not be the Notion of [ Ens , ] which is Apply'd , but Another very Different Notion , viz. that of Existence . Wherefore , tho' we call GOD an Ens , when the Question is not precisely ( as here it is ) about the Perfection or Imperfection of our Notion or Expression ; yet , in our case , where we nicely examine what Natural Notions of ours are properly fit to be transferr'd to Him ; it is manifest , that both by reason of it's Metaphysical Composition , and also of it's Potentiality , it is utterly incompetent to be apply'd to God ; since in both respects it carries along with it an Unavoidable Imperfection ; and , consequently , much less can we say there are in GOD Three Things , or Tria Entia . The word [ Substance ] is with much more Reason transferr'd to GOD , because it formally imports a Distinct Notion from Accidents , and a Sustainer of them in Being ; whence it is in a manner the same Notion as a Suppositum or Subsister . 7. On the other side , taking these Words according to their most formal Signification , the Notion of the words [ Person ] and [ Subsistent ] , with which later , the Common Use among Learned Men , does now confound [ Suppositum , ] does neither speak Potentiality , nor Composition , but barely signifies the ultimate Completion in the Line of Rational Being , or Independency on any other Created Thing of Notion for their Existing : And thence they have a just Title to be Transferrible to the Divine Nature . And hence it is , that the Distinction of those Three Particulars , which the Divine Essence verisies , ought not to be taken from the manner in which Things in the Line of Substance use to be Distinguisht , that is , by Intrinsecal Differences ; nor ought the Common Suppositum be apprehended to be Distinguisht or Particulariz'd by such a gross way ▪ yet , ( as was shown ) Distinguisht it must be , and there is no other way , nor any other Notion , according to which it can be conceiv'd to be Particulariz'd or Distinguisht , but that of Relation ; the formal Notion of which is Ad Aliquid , ( or , some way or other ) Ad Aliud ; by which too we have seen GOD's Knowing and Loving Himself obliges us to distinguish Him : whence follows , that the Divine Nature is Distinguisht Relatiuely . Nor does this Notion multiply the Common Nature Essentially , as did the former way which distinguisht the Common Notion by Essential Differences : Both because the Relation by Prelim. X. and XI . is not Distinguisht from the Divine Essence it self which is the Reason and Ground of Referring it diversely ; as also , because it springs from a most High Perfection in GOD as He is a Spirit ; I add , and terminates also in a High Perfection under the Notion of Being , viz. in that of Personality or Person . In a word , 't is the Divine Essence which is Distinguisht or Particulariz'd , there being nothing else in GOD to be Distinguisht : Yet it is not Distinguisht Essentially or according to the precise Notion of Essence or Being , but Relatively ; because it is Infinite in Being , and so can be , in that Absolute Re●●ct , but One. 8. For the same Reason , I avoid using the word ▪ ●●dividuum , ] tho' I do not blame others that do . ●erhaps I am too scrupulous in it , yet I cannot ●●t think 't is something liable to exception , at ●ast comparatively . My Reasons are : First , 'T is ●●o Logical and Artificial ; and , consequently , tho' it has got , I know not how , out of the Schools into the Language of some well-bred Men to say , [ 't is the same Individual Man , ] yet , for all that , it is not the Vulgar Speech , nor so Natural . Secondly , Because it is made Particularly such by it's Difference too , ( viz. by the Complexion of it's Accidents ; ) and , subsuming under the Specifick Notion , 't is only a Negation of the Superiour Notions , and signifies the same as Ungenerical or Unspecifical . Whereas , the Word [ Person ] has a Positive Signification , nor has any reference to the Genus and Species , as is seen in Angels : And , moreover , it directly imports the highest Perfection in the Line of [ Substance ; ] and therefore it is fitly Transferrible to GOD. Again , the word [ Individuum ] being a Logical Term , is more subject to wrangle . For Artists being the Imposers , and ( as it were ) Creators of the Words which themselves use ; and such Men seldom Agreeing in their Thoughts and Meanings ; nor consenting universally that such a word shall stand for such a Meaning or Notion ; it happens that some of them do take the Word in one Sense others in another ; and very frequently ampliate or restrain the Signification of it at pleasure . Hence perpetual , and ( if this Inconvenience be not remedy'd by Clear Definitions of such Words ) Eternal Dissentions must needs ensue . And , indeed , most of the Li●ig●●● Disputes and Controversies among Learned M●● ( in case the Contesters be Sincere and Disintere●●ed do arise from this Defect now mention'd . Fro● which mischief the Words us'd by the General●● to express our Natural Notions , are Free ; for we find by Experience that the Vulgar understand one another very well and easily ; nor are subject to perpetual Word-skirmishes in their Common Conversation , as the Others are . 9. Nor can it be inferr'd from this Explication ▪ that , by the same reason , there would be a Trinity of Persons in Angels and Souls Separated when they Know and Love themselves . For Self-Knowledge formally consisting in this , that the Thing known does Inexist in it's own Knowing Power as an Object , or after an Intellectual manner ; and the Existence , and consequently , Inexistence of all Creatures being Extrinsecal o● Acoidental to them , ( as being given them by Another ) and not Essential to them , or their very Essence , as it is in GOD ▪ it being one of his Peculiar Attributes : Hence i● follows , that the Relation of Knower and Known is in them Accidental to them , as being Grounded on what 's Accidental to their Essences ; and consequently , by Prelim. X. is Identify'd with the Object accidentally only : Whence it can make only an Accidental Distinction in them , and not a Distinction in their Substance , or a Distinction of that most perfect ▪ Substantial Notion , [ Person ; ] as , for the contrary reason , it must make in GOD. Add , that GOD's Self-Knowledge is properly and perfectly Essential to Him as He is an Infinite Spirit ; and ( as it were ) his Primary Operation ; by which ( according to our manner of Conceiving ) he is Constituted such ; or rather , 〈…〉 E●●ence , as He is a Spirit , does consist in it ▪ ●●ereas , in Angels and Souls , the Knowing the ●…le Extent of Entity and even GOD Himself , 〈…〉 the Primary Operation for which Nature in●●nded them ; and to Know themselves was only 〈◊〉 Means or First-Step to bring them to the ●nowledge of all other Things , and thence of GOD : And therefore Self-Knowledge is far from being their Primary Operation ; or that , by respect ●o ▪ which their Essence was Constituted ; nor , consequently , can it distinguish their Substance , as it does and must in GOD. 10. Nor , lastly , can it be thought , that the Common Suppositum , having all Perfections that can ●● in the Line of Being , and therefore , amongst the rest , Personality , in it , does constitute a Fourth Person ; for since GOD , or the Common Suppositum , as has been shown , is Common to the three Relative Persons , or in them all , it carries along with it all the Perfections of the Divinity , and among the rest the Personality too , and communicates it to the Relative Persons , as it does all the other Positive or Absolute Perfections in the Godhead . Whence they have all of them to subsist or Absolutely to be Persons from the Godhead , or the Common Suppositum ; and that they are Different Persons comes wholly and solely from their Distinct Relations , as was prov'd above . So that there is no show that the Common Suppositum can make a Fourth or Distinct Person ; since what 's Common to All , or each , cannot be Particular or Contradistinguisht to any ; Nor is there any Opposition of the Common Person to the Relative ones ; both because it has an Absolute and not a Relative Notion ▪ as also , because it is so far from being Opposite , that it is coincident with them all or with each of them . SECT . VII . That this Distinction of Three Persons puts no Imperfection in the Divine Nature ; and that they are most-●itly call'd , the Father , Son , and Holy Spirit . 1. GOD being the Author of Order and not of Confusion , 't is most worthy His Divine Nature , and most Consonant to True Reason , that there should be some Order amongst those Thre● Divine Persons , and some Solid Ground for that Order . And , since all Order amongst More , must begin from some One , or some First ; it follows , that there must be some One amongst them , which is the First or Beginning of that Order ; and that therefore the Notion of the word [ Beginning , ] must be Transferr'd to GOD , or be Peculiar to some One of those Persons who is GOD ; provided it can be done without attributing to Him any Imperfection : Which waving our Proofs brought hereafter to the contrary ) is even hence Incredible it should ; ●ince , as was now shown , and will farther appear , it is Absolutely Necessary there should be some First , or some Beginning amongst them ; and , certainly , there can be no Absolute Necessity to attribute any Imperfection to GOD. 2. And , that it ought to be so , this Plain Reason farther evinces ; because , since we cannot name them all at once ; we must , in recounting them , forcibly name some One of them First : Nor could we give any good reason why we did this , unless there were some Consideration in that Person it self , which oblig'd us to it ; otherwise we must be forced to say we did it without reason , or nam'd them at random . 3. It remains then to show which of the Three Persons is the First ; to give the reason why we put Him first ; and , in what Sense , He is a First , or Principium , in that Order . 4. Reflecting then on those Relations of Known and Knowing , we find that the F●rmer of these , the Divine Essence , as Known , has the Nature or Notion of an Object ; and the Later , ( there being no Potentiality in GOD ) the Nature of Actual Knowledge ▪ and that our Natural Notions ascertain us that the Knowledge proceeds from the Object ; for this is that which determines the Indifferency of our Knowing Power by Informing it , and produces the Act of Knowledge ; or , as the Schools phrase it , Specifies it . Whence , abstracting this way of producing Knowledge in us from all Potentiality and Causality , ( as is most ●it , ) and only Applying to GOD what 's Essential to the Notion of an Object ; ( in the being of which in our Understanding , Knowledge does necessarily consist , ) we must rationally conceive and affirm , that the Divine Nature as Knowledge , or as Knowing Himself , does pr●ceed from the Divine Nature as an Object , or as Known : and that therefore this Later is the Origin , Principium , or First of those Three Persons ; and Divine Knowledge , the Second ; it being Evident , that Love , which proceeds from the Goodness of the Object in our Knowledge , and , therefore , in this Order of our Natural Notions , necessarily presupposes the other Two , is with good Reason to be accounted the Third . 5. For , in regard there can be no Adequate or Proper Object of the Divine Understanding , but the Divine Essence it self , and that all Others do fall Infinitely short of being worthy of it ; hence , it is equally argumentative to say , that His Knowledge as it is Divine , proceeds from the Divine Essence as an Object ; as it is , that our Knowledge of Nature does proceed from Nasural Objects ; since , according to our most Natural and Necessary Notions , it as unavoidably follows , that GOD's Knowledge is therefore Divine , because the Object of it is GOD ; as it follows that our Knowledge is therefore Natural because the Object of it is of Natural Notions ; or Mathematical , because it has for it's Object those Notions which are Mathematical ; nay , it would be Perfect Nonsense to affirm the contrary , or assign any other reason for it . So evidently Consonant it is to True Reason , and to our Natural Notions , to affirm that the Knowledge , even tho' Divine , does proceed from the Divine Object ; or , which is the same , that the Divine Nature as an Object is the First that we can possibly conceive in the Order of those Notions which we use when we say , [ GOD Knows and Loves Himself ; ] or is the Beginning and Origin of Divine Knowledge , and , consequently , of Divine Love. 6. To Explicate this yet more fully , and to clear our Natural Notion of Knowing , let us reflect on that passage of St. Austin at the end of his Confessions , [ Nos ista quae fecisti videmus quia sunt : Tu autem quia vides ea , sunt . ] We see , ( or know ) the things which thou hast made , because they are ; but when thou seest them , thy Seeing them makes them bee . These last words show that when any Created Being proceeds from GOD , His Understanding does begin that a●fair , and by Knowing it , makes them bee , or Creates them ; but , in all other cases , our Knowledge comes from the Being of the Object . 'T is then this Nature of Knowledge , thus Explicated , which is our Natural Notion of it , and which is Proper to our Soul as it is Spiritual . Wherefore we must either Transfer This to GOD , and say that His Knowledge comes from the Object ; or else ( having no Other Notion of it ) we can never Understand the Meaning of those Words , [ GOD Knows Himself , ] nor , consequently Affirm that He does so . Certainly , nothing can be plainer than 't is , that we cannot conceive this Knowledge to be of GOD , but because the Object of it is GOD. Wherefore , 't is even hence most Evident , that the Procession of the Knowledge begins from the Object , or is originiz'd by it ; So that the Knower , as such , has nothing but what he has from that which is Known . Whence follows , That this Priority of Order , spoken of above , must be a Priority of Origin , and has the Notion of Principiation to what 's principiated or proceeds from it : Nor does this kind of Priority put any Imperfection , or less Perfection in the Divine Nature as Knowing , more than it does in the same Nature as Known ; because it is equally Essential to the Divine Nature to be Knowing as 't is to be Known ; and consequently , 't is impossible to conceive that one of the Correlates , considering them purely as Related , ( as is our case ) should more depend on the Other , than that the Other should depend on It. Lastly , since , as appears by the words , [ GOD Knows Himself , ] both the Correlates are GOD , in whom is all Perfection imaginable ; 't is impossible , that either GOD as Known , or as Knower , should be in any sort Imperfect , notwithstanding the Priority of Origin between them ; since this Priority arises out of that most Perfect Notion of Knowing , which necessitates , that the Knowledge must proceed , or be originiz'd from the Object Known ; as has been shown , § . 5. 7. But to put it past contest , that , notwithstanding we must be forced to allow that Knowledge is thus Originiz'd from the Object , yet there is not less Perfection in one than in the other , we lay this Position ; viz. That the DEITY being Infinitely Perfect , where ever the Deity is , there must also be all the Perfections imaginable . Since then , when we say , [ GOD Knows Himself , ] both the Knower and Thing Known are GOD ; there is found in each of them all the Absolute Attributes which belong to the DEITY , with the Connotate of [ Infinite ] annext to them ; that is , all Imaginable Perfections are both in the One and the Other . Moreover , amongst those Attributes , Self-Existence is one ; if , indeed , it may be call'd an Attribute , and not rather , ( as Metaphysicks demonstrate ) according to our manner of conceiving , the very Essence of GOD ; whence all ▪ His Divine Attributes ( according to our way of Discoursing ) spring . Since then Self-Existence is found in both , and the Notion of Self-existence bars all Imperfection or Dependence in Being , and all the ●orts of other Priorities but that of Origin ; 't is impossible to conceive that either of them should be Imperfect , or Dependent on the other . Again , since it is equally Essential to GOD to be Known , as it is to Know ; and GOD cannot be Known without a Knower ; if this Method of Objecting were Allowable where both are Infinite , we might with Equal Reason say , That the First Person , who is the Divine Object Known , depends on the Second , as that the Second , who is Divine Knowledge , depends on the First . 'T is a Common Maxim , That Relationes mutuo se ponunt & auferunt ; and yet neither of them is said to be Dependent on the Other ; since Mutual Dependence as to the Same Common Notion is direct Nonsence . But the main point is , that this Principiation or Origination does not formally respect the DEITY it self , or the Common Suppositum , any more in One than in the Other ; but only , the DEITY as Related ; that is , the Divine Personalities ; wherefore , the Relation , ( by Prelim. X. XI . ) not being really Distinguisht from , but Identify'd with , the Ground of Referring ; cannot , out of their formal Notion , add any New Perfection unto it ; especially , since the Common Suppositum , exprest by the Absolute word [ GOD , ] which is the Ground of all the Divine Relations , has in it the whole Perfection of them All. 8. From this Discourse we see how the Trinity is in the Unity , because the Ground of all these Relations , that is , the Relations themselves ; and , consequently , all the Three Persons , which are constituted by those Relations , are in that One Deity , or in the Unity of the Godhead : and , withall , how the Unity of the GODHEAD is in the Trinity of Persons , because one and the same Divine Nature is in them all ; as is evident from these very Terms ; [ GOD Knows and Loves Himself . ] Which , tho' Mysterious to the Rude and Unelevated Conceptions of Vulgar Discoursers , is , notwithstanding , ( as has been shown ) if we take each single consideration of it asunder by our Abstractive or Natural way of conceiving , and discourse upon each of them distinctly , or as thus aparted , is perfectly Consonant to Reason working upon our Natural Notions . 9. We come next to consider by what Names this First and Second Person , the Divine Nature Known and Knower are to be call'd . In order to which we lay these Positions , viz. That GOD , who is in them both , is Living , ( or rather Essentially Life ; ) and , consequently , those two Persons in whom the Godhead is , must be Living also . Next , Knowledge cannot be otherwise conceiv'd but to come , or ( as we use to say ) pr●ceed from the Object ; and therefore the Second Person must proceed from the First . Thirdly , The Divinity communicates it's own Nature to the Knower , as appears by the words [ Knows himself . ] and also by Reason ; for , otherwise , we could not say , [ It is Known , ] if It were not in the Knowledge or C●njoyn'd with it Spiritually or intellectually . Now , if we spell these necessary Truths together , all which are imply'd in these words , [ GOD Knows Himself , ] we shall find they compound , and ( not barely imply , but ) fully express that the Definition of a SON is appropriated to the Second Person , viz. That He is a Living Person Proceeding from a Living Person , whose Nature is of the same Kind as the others , and is Conjoyn'd with him , or remains in him ; ] whence follows , that His Correlate must properly and necessarily be call'd a FATHER ; and lastly , that the Procession of Him from His Father can therefore have no other Notion , or Word which we have , that can ●it it , but that of GENERATION . 10. Hence it is , that Knowledge is Appropriated to the Second Person the SON ; for which reason He particularly took our Flesh upon Him , and came to be our Master , and to instruct us in His Holy Law. Hence He is call'd Sapientia Patris , or Verbum , because Knowing does intellectually speak or express the Divine Nature Known by Him ; as our Conception or Verbum Mentis does the Thing , or Truth , we conceive . Hence , He is truly said to be Deus de Deo , Lumen de Lumine , Deus verus de Deo vero : Because the Common Suppositum , the GODHEAD , is in both ; and the Divine Nature as He is precisely a Knower is Originiz'd from it self , as it 's own Object . Hence , lastly , Because of the Common Nature in both , and the Proceeding of One from the Other , He is call'd Imago Patris , Figura Substantiae ejus , &c. All which , and many other such Expressions are exactly verify'd by the Principles here laid , and our Consonant Deductions from them . 11. Since then the Notion of Father and Son a●e truly attributed to the Common Suppositum exprest by the Absolute word [ GOD ; ] it is not only Fitting but Necessary , that those Notions should be the most perfectly such , as is Possible to be imagin'd . Wherefore , since Sons amongst us , do proceed from their Fathers according to Specifical Likeness in Nature ; it is most becoming GOD's Infinite Perfection , and His most ultimately Determih'd Essence ; that is , indeed the most Perfect Unity of the GODHEAD it self , that His Coeternal Son should proceed from His Eternal Father according to the most Perfect IDENTITY of Nature that can be conceiv'd ; that is , according to the self-same Numerical Nature . Wherefore this Divine Procession ought not to be explicated by Analogy to the Specifical Nature of Man , and it 's being Common to more Individuals : For the Species does necessarily imply some Potentiality , tho' the Genus does more ; and is Determinable ( as was said ) by Differences which are Intrin●●cal in the Line of Ens ; and , therefore , ( as was prov'd ) do constitute formally more Entia , that is , more Things which have diverse Essences ; all which is Inconsistent with the Divine Nature : Nor ought any Composition of such Superiour ( or Potential ) Notions be Transferr'd to GOD. And much less , since the Common Suppositum , ( however it be predicated of more Particulars in the Manner explicated above , ) has in it self , by virtue of it's own Infinite Self-Existence , the utmost Perfection in the Line of Substance ; and is , by reason of it's Purest Actuality , more perfectly One Singular Absolute Being , than any Suppositum or Individuum is or can be amongst us Creatures . 12. And the same , partly for the same reason , is , ( Mutatis Mutandis ) to be said of the Third Particular verify'd of GOD , or of the Third Person of the most B. Trinity . For , since it must be granted , that GOD Loves Himself , and the word [ Himself , ] in the Predicate of that Proposition , signifies the same as the word [ GOD , ] which is the Subject of it ; 't is as Evident , that the Divine Nature Loving is the same with the Divine Nature Loved , as it is that GOD is GOD. But , besides , that this is Evident from the very Terms , or the plain Sense of Words , there is Another very Peculiar Reason springing out of the particular Nature of LOVE , which according to our Natural and Vulgar Notions , ( by which we are here to guide our selves ) signifies to be Spiritually Unitive of the Lover to the Thing Loved . Our Common Unstudy'd Thoughts and Language gives this to be True : If two Friends Love one another dearly , all Mankind uses to say , They are all One ; and our B. Saviour prays to His Heavenly Father that He and His Disciples may be One , as Himself and his Father are One ; that is , by Mutual Love ; it being impossible those Words can there bear any other Signification . 13. We have seen above , That Divine Love , which is the Third Person , proceeds from the Goodness of the Divine Object , or from the Divine Essence Known , ( that is , the Father ) in His own Divine Knowledge , in which consists Essential Truth ; that this Truth is therefore GOD's Greatest Good ; because this Infinite Truth is the Best Perfection of His Nature as it is Intelligent or Spiritual : That , because it does thus proceed from the Divine Object in the Divine Knowledge , this Third Person does , therefore , proceed from the Father and the Son immediately and formally according to their Distinct Personalities or Relations ; and that , therefore , because no Relation can be grounded on Another Relation , but can only Refer what 's Absolute , there can be no Reciprocal , Opposite or Distinct Relation of the Divine Object-Known to the Lover ; nor , consequently , any occasion of conceiving a Fourth Person : It remains now to show , that since Love ( by § . 12. ) imports a Spiritual Union or Conjunction of the Lover with that which it Loves ; therefore , from the very Notion of the word [ Conjoyn'd , ] there must be some Distinction between those which are thus Ioyn'd-together : Since , what 's in Every Respect One and the Same , cannot , without Injury to Common Sense , be said to be Conjoyn'd with it self in Any Respect , that is , Conjoyn'd at all . But in what manner does this Third Person proceed from the other Two ? Not according to Likeness ( or Identity ) of Nature , as did the Son : but it presupposes this Likeness , Conformity , Agreeableness or Identity of Nature in the Object as Known , and in the Knower as Knowing it ; for , in this consists that Greatest Good call'd Truth , which is the Object of Love ; and 't is against all our Natural Notions to conceive Actual Love of a thing not Suppos'd to bee : Wherefore this Similitude of Nature is not the Formal Motive , nor the Manner by which Divine Love proceeds ; but only this , that the other two Persons according to their Distinction of Knower and Known , ( in which consists Divine Truth ) do integrate , as it were , that Bonum Dei , or Good , which is the Adequate Object of the Divine Will. The Son , therefore , proceeds from His Father , by having Communicated to Him the same Form , ( as it were ) or the Divine Nature as an Object which formally constitutes Him a Knower of it , and thence , a Son ; The B. Spirit proceeds from the two other Persons as they are a Good to the Divine Nature ; which it Affects , Spiritually clings to , or embraces ; and so becomes or is Actually United or One with it . The Former ( according to our weak manner of Conceiving ) proceeds as coming from the Object Communicating it self to it ; the Later , by it's being drawn , as it were , by the Object and ●…oving it self - forwards to , ( or rather , in reality , ha●ing actually ) an Union with it . The Former , by ●ay of Informing , or being in the Divine Under●●anding ; The Later , by enamouring the Divine Will to pursue what is conceiv'd to be out of the Lover as such ; or rather , in our case , to enjoy it actually . Which expression tho' most beseeming a Pure Actuality of Being , yet it debars not the Distinction between the Good Enjoy'd and the Enjoyer of it , but obliges us to conceive them as thus Distinct. 14. Having thus declar'd the Particularity or Distinction of the Three Divine Persons , in order to one another , it is seasonable to manifest , in the ●ext place , what Names and what Effects are peculiarly to be Attributed to each of them , as they relate to us . Whence , it may appear , that as our Explication is Agreeable to Right Reason , so it is no less Consonant to Holy Scripture , and to the Sense and Language of the Christian Church . To mention a few Chief ones , will hint to us the ●est . 15. Since then Being is the First , in Order , of all our Natural Notions , so that we cannot conceive any thing to be Communicated , or to deserve Love unless it is : Hence the Notion of the Divine Being , is justly conceiv'd to be Appropriated to ▪ the First Person , who is the Beginning and Origin of the rest , and communicates it to the Son ; whence proceeds , ( as was now said ) the B. Spirit who is Divine Love. Hence , also , since Every thing Acts as it Is , He is said to be Author and Cause of all Created Being , or the Creatour of all things . Hence also He is said to be the Father of all his Creatures , ( in a Natural , but less Proper Sense ) because He gives us our Being ; and in a more especial manner , since His Only Son , by taking our Nature upon Him , made Himself , in some sort , our Brother : As also , in a Civil Sense ; because it belongs to Fathers to provide for their Children , as His Heavenly Providence does for all His Creatures . Not to speak how He is a Father in a Spiritual Sense , as we are Re-generated by His Grace , given us freely for the Merits , and by the Means of His Eternal Son whom he sent amongst us to that end . 16. What peculiar Attributes are appropriated to the Son , is declard above , § . 10. I only remark here , that when he is call'd Verbum , the WORD , by a Metaphor taken from our Verbum Mentis , that is , our Conception or Notion of an Object in our Knowing Power ; we must take heed we do not understand , by those words , that Imperfect Form of speaking Truth interiourly , which is found in Mental Propositions , which Affirm , or Deny ; for even in Angels and Separated Souls ( as has been demonstrated ) Knowledge is above all ▪ Composition of several Notions , of which Propositions are made ; but it must be meant , that the Divine Object , in which is Essentially all the Metaphysical Verity both of GOD and of all Creatures , is most Expressly in Him as He is the Knower of it ; that is , indeed , in the very Divine Essence ; in which the most Actual , that is , the most Bright , and most Universal Truth , is Communicated to Him from the Father , and is most exactly in Him. We must take heed also , that when He is call'd Imago Patris , and such like , some Cartesian or other Ideist , catching at the word , do not make ●im a meer Picture or Similitude of His Father ; ●…d that He has not therefore the very Divine created Essence , or the Divine Nature in Him , ●…t only some Created Similitude of it . I must ●…nfess this sutes well enough with the Doctrine Ideas in our Mind , which are Spiritual Pour●…itures or Resemblances of the Things we know , ●…d not the Things themselves : But that it sutes ●…ither with Reason or Faith , they can never show ●…s ; for how can meer Fancies agree with such Sublime Realities ; or Erroneous Foundations support the Truth of Faith in the Opinion of Doub●…ers , by giving Consonant and Genuine Explications of it . 17. The Third Person , Divine Love , is call'd 〈…〉 Comforter , or Strengthener , because nothing more gives our Souls such Strength to resist the Assaults of our Spiritual Enemies , break thorow ●ll Difficulties , and press forwards vigorously to at●ain our True End , Eternal Happiness , which is ●he Sight of GOD , than does an Ardent Love of ●im ; which , ( Every thing acting as it is ) is the ●●culiar Gift of the Holy Ghost ; who , is , not only by His Common Essence , ( as are also the rest , ) but also by the Particularity of his Person , DIVINE LOVE . For the same reason , He is call'd a Spi●itual Unction ; because it was customary to Anoint ●hose with Oil , who were to exert their Strength 〈…〉 any Encounter or Exercise , to give their Limbs greater Force and Agility . For the same reason , He is call'd [ Fire , ] which in an Ordinary Metaphor is apply'd to an Ardent Love ; and thence he came down in Tongues of Fire ; because Fire is the most Active and Purest Body we have ; and in regard Love does enflame the Spirits to pursue the Good we affectionately long for . For this reason also , He is call'd our Spiritual Life ; because Life consists in Self-moving ; and nothing moves us so efficaciously as Love , which is the proper Act of the Will , that Faculty that sets all our Inferiour Powers on work . And for the same reason , He is called particularly the Spirit ; because as the Animal Spirits in the Body give us all our Natural Motion , so Divine Love , his peculiar Name ; and Nature , gives us all our Supernatural Tendency to Heaven ; so that no External or Interiour Actions we perform do avail us , or bring us the least Step nearer our True End , Eternal Happiness , unless either out of an Immediate or Remote Intention , it be done out of that Regard or Intuitus . Another reason why He is call'd [ Spirit , ] which properly signifies Breath , is , Because Breath and Life are in common speech Equivalent : [ While I breath , ] and [ while I live , ] having the same signification ; as have also to Expire and to Die. Lastly , since Heavenly Love , which Divines call Sanctifying Grace , is our Supernatural Life , which ( as was said ) the Peculiar Influence of the Third Person does ( as it were ) inspire or breath into our Souls ; hence , He is , from this Effect , by a Specifical Appellation , call'd the HOLY GHOST or Holy Spirit . For , none can think He is call'd Spirit , meerly because He is of a Spiritual Nature , since this is an Attribute of the GODHEAD , and therefore Common to all the Three Persons ; nor , because He proceeds from the Father and the Son by a kind of Imaginary Action call'd Spiration ; of which I must , for my part , confess I can make no Conception , nor how it comes to be Transferr'd to GOD. 18. I may perhaps incurr some . Censure for denying the Procession of the Holy Ghost , is to be explicated by Spiration , of which Word many Great Men have made use . The best way to clear my self from affecting Singularity , is to give my Reasons why I dislike it , and submit them to the Judgment of our Peers . First , Faith ( as was shewn Preliminary V. ) must have been deliver'd in such Language as is apt to signify our Natural Notions . Secondly , Hence , tho' it may be allowed to Learned Men , in Explicating this Mystery , to make use , upon occasion , of some Term of Art which is current in Schools ; yet is it utterly Disallowable , to use any which has not for its Sense , some Natural Notion of Mankind ; otherwise it will Blunder the Explication instead of Clearing it . Thirdly , It is agreed , and most Consonant to Reason , that no Notion taken from Material Beings ought to be Transferr'd to GOD , but by the Intervention of Spiritual ones , to which they are Metaphosically apply'd ; in regard He is of a Spiritual , and not of a Corporeal Nature . Fourthly , There can be no Spiritual Notion that respects the Internal Nature of a Spirit , but Being , Knowledge , Will , and the Objects of these too last , which determin their Internal Operations . Fifthly , There is none of all these that seems Proper to signify the Procession of Divine Love , by Spiration . Not Being ! for That , if Compleat , Stayes in its self , as being the most Absolute Notion : nor can it respect any other Notion conceivable in GOD otherwise than as an Object . Not Knowledge , for that is an Immanent Act , and is compleated in this , that the Object be such in the Knower , as it is in its self ; whereas Spiration has a Notion of something Transitive to Another . Sixthly , It has too much of Action in it's Formal Notion , which may hazard to breed a Conceit of Efficiency and Effect . And , lastly , Because , as apply'd here to signifie a Procession from Father and Son , it can have no one Notion in it , and therefore it has None . For , since the Holy Ghost does proceed from them according to their Personalities ; that is , from the Divine Essence as Known , and as the Knower of it ; and there can be no one Notion Common to Thing Known and Knower , which are so widely Different , being toto genere Disparate and Contradistinct , but Being ; my Dulness cannot comprehend what one Notion the word [ Spiration ] can signifie ; since it cannot be Univocally Apply'd to both ; nor how it sutes with our Natural Notions we have of Spiritual Natures ; nor in what manner , or for what reason it is Transferr'd to GOD : which makes me doubt that meerly the word [ Spiritus ] apply'd particularly to the Holy Ghost , was the best Ground of this recourse to Spiration , and not the Notion of any Virtue , or Operation which Nature has given us of a Spiritual Being . Notwithstanding , I doubt not but these Great Divines had some good meaning in it , tho' it colours not with my Thoughts : Nay , that they meant the same in substance which I do , tho' perhaps I do more nicely ●ift the Propriety of Words in handling such a Delicate Point , than they did . And the same , I doubt not , may be said of all those Learned Writers who have of late Explicated this Mystery variously : of which the Anti-Trinitarians do very frivolously make great Brags , and hope to get some Advantage by it . I say , very frivolously : For , the Article of Faith it self Abstracts from all Explications , and stands Firm on it's own Grounds , Divine Revelation ; tho' both They , I , and Others , should all of us fall short in Explicating it right in every particular . Thus much concerning the Names and peculiar Attributes of the Three Persons , and the Congruous Reasons why we apply such Attributes to each . 19. Notwithstanding all that is said above , concerning these Appropriations in the performing Different Effects , belonging to the Particular Notion , and ( as it were ) Genius of each Person , as such ; whenever GOD does any thing ad extra , or produces any Effect in His Creatures , the Whole Trinity concurs to that Action . For , since nothing can work but it must have the Being or Essence proper to it's self ; nor Act , unless it have a Will , the Notion of which is to be the Principle of Acting ; nor can an Infinitely perfect Being act , without Knowing What , and How to Act ; both the Eternal Father , Son , and Spirit , must all concur to every such Action . But 't is otherwise in that which passes ad intra , or within the Deity it self , because of their Relative Distinction and Opposition to one another . For , ( if I may be allow'd to repeat so oft what is of most Importance ) GOD , precisely as the Divine Object , or as Known , begets Divine Knowledge ; and the Divine Essence in the Divine Knowledge , which is Essential Truth , and the most Proper and Best Perfection or Good of a Spiritual Nature , is that Adequate Object from which Divine Love proceeds . Hence it is , that since God's Essence is Self-Existence , which is Infinitely Actual , and Infinitely Intelligible , or rather , Infinitely Known ; it is Proper to say , that the GODHEAD Self-Exists by the Father , Knows it Self by the Son who is Divine Knowledge , and Loves it Self by the Holy Ghost who is Divine Love. Nor can any thing be more Agreeable to Reason than that it should be so , in case ( as we ought ) we will exalt GOD Infinitely above His Creatures : For , since Creatures do Exist by an Existence which is Accidental to them , whence it comes that their Powers by which they operate are in the Line of Quality , or are Accidents ; It is therefore most Fitting , that GOD , in whom there is nothing that is Accidental , but the most refined or sublim'd Notion of Substance , should exercise his own Essence upon Himself ; and therefore should have a Substantial Notion that is a Person , by and in which that Particular to which is specially appropriated Divine Essence should Exist ; and , instead of Powers which are Accidents , should have particular Substances or Persons , by which He Knows and Loves Himself . And therefore , as is said above , GOD Self-exists or is by the Person of the Father , Knows Himself by the Person of the Son , and Loves Himself by the Person of the Holy Ghost . SECT . VIII . That , notwithstanding this Plurality of Persons , the Divine Essence is not less perfectly Simple in it's self ; or rather , 't is more , ( or in more Respects , ) ONE , than it would have been had there not been this Plurality of Persons . 1. WHat the Opposers of the B. Trinity most pretend to fear , is , That this Tenet does prejudice the UNITY of the GODHEAD . Now , tho' it has been already sufficiently prov'd , that this has not the least show of Difficulty to a Considering Man ; yet , it were not amiss , for their farther Satisfaction , to give this Point a farther Clearing , tho' it wrong the Method of Discoursing by making Repetitions ; in which I sometimes indulge my self , to inculcate it better to my Readers , by their seeing the Coherence of this Doctrine in divers and several occasions . For 't is not every Man's Talent to carry along with him every Link in the Chain of a Connected Discourse , without needing to be re-minded of it . 2. But first , I complain that these Objecters confound themselves by not Distinguishing clearly their own Conceptions ; and , therefore , neither We nor Themselves , know well what it is they would be at . Let us try then if we can unravel their Thoughts , which they have taken such pains to perplex . Can they deny that GOD Knows and Loves Himself ? 'T is certain they will not ; for this makes GOD less Perfect than a Creature : Tho' , as far as I see they never think of it , or what Consequences follow from it ; notwithstanding ( as was shown ) this is the Ground-work on which all true Explication of this Mystery is built . Can they deny , that , this granted , ( as it must be ) we are forced to affirm that GOD is the Knower , and Object Known ; as also the Lover and Thing Loved ? The very words fly in their Faces , and tell them they deny that which is perfectly Equivalent to what they have granted . Will they deny that the GODHEAD is One and the Same under all the Notions , ( whatever they are ) which is signifi'd by all those Relative and Contradistinct Names or Words ? 'T is equally against Common Sense , unless they will say , that by the word [ Himself ] is not meant [ GOD , ] which is Self-evident . Can they say , that Knower and Known , Lover and Loved , are not Distinct , and ( in some sort ) Opposite Notions ? All Mankind will laugh at them , and every Junior Sophister who ever heard of the Predicament of Relation will hiss them . Can they say that the Deity does not Verifie those Distinct Notions , or that we say False when we attribute them to GOD ? Themselves will not affirm it . Can they say , That , tho' GOD Verifies them , yet there is no Distinction at all in GOD ? This is pure Nonsense . For , First , These Distinct Notions or Attributes are not Extrinsecal Denominations , but most Intrinsecal and even Essential to GOD ; to Know and Love Himself being the Perfection of His Spiritual Nature , and one of His Chiefest Attributes . Next , If those Notions do most formally import Distinction , and there be in GOD that which verifies them , there is what verifies Distinction , in GOD. May they not then with equal reason say , that Gold verifies the Notions of Yellow , and Heavy , yet there is no Yellowness or Weightiness in Gold ? Can they say , That tho' there be Distinction ▪ in GOD , yet it does not any way or under any Respect , make GOD Distinct ? This were to call Self - Evidence in question , and arraign First Principles . For is it not Self-Known that a Form , or Abstract Notion cannot be in any thing , but it must make and denominate it such as it self is ; and may they not as well say that Whiteness may be in a Wall and yet not make it White , or Humanity in a thing and not make it a Man , as that Distinction is in a thing and yet not make it Distinct ? Can they find any thing in GOD besides Substance to Distinguish ; that is , will they put any thing in GOD that ●s an Accident , or ( which is the same ) that is Not-Self-Existent ? 'T is imp●●●ble to pretend it . Can they say , That Distinction of the Substance , does not Particularize it , or ●ake Distinct Substances ? How can they ? Distinction , whereever it is , must make something or other Distinct ; and this according to the Nature of the Thing it distinguishes : And therefore if there be only Substance for it to affect , it must put Distinct or Particular Substances ; and this as evidently , as if a Quantitative Thing be Distinguisht it must make Distinct or more Quanta . Will they say these Distinct Substances , they being Spiritual or Intelligent , are not to be ●all'd [ PERSONS ? ] They would do well to let us know their Reason , and withal to assign us some Other Name by which Three such Substances ought more properly be called . I wish then we knew where their Difficulty pinches : For , otherwise , it would half persuade an uncharitable Man that their Reason ails nothing when it knows not whereabouts it is hurt ; whence would follow , that 't is only their Will which is ill at ease . But , I rather think they are blunder'd by not - Distinguishing their Notions Exactly , and not Proceeding upon them Orderly : Or perhaps , as Men led by Imagination use , they fancy there must be a just parallel between Corporeal and Spiritual Natures ▪ and ( which is worse ) between a Finite and an Infinite Being , and that they must fit one another exactly as Two Tallies do ; and , if they find they do not sute in every regard , their Phantastick Guide has lost his way , and complains sadly of the Perplexity , in which nothing but his own Rashness or Unskillfulness has plung'd him . 3. To breed a Conceit in their Easie and Weak Proselytes that the Doctrine of the Trinity is injurious to the Unity and P●●●ection of the GODHEAD , they amuze them with several Objections which nothing but the Dota●●● of Fancy could suggest . V. G. They 'll alledge , That if the Son has the Divine Essence from the Father , then the Father Pre-exists , and therefore the Son cannot be Eternal . By which 't is manifest , That those Men apprehend there is no Prae-istence but that of Time ; nay , they conceit that Eternity it self is a long Flux of Time , or something Like it , whereas 't is a Duration of a quite Contradictory Nature to it ; whereupon the Grossness of their Fancy is presently startled and stunn'd ; and their Ignorance of such Preliminary Truths does presently furnish them with this , as it may with a thousand other such wild Objections . To meet with them I desire them to reflect , that as there could not be any Instant in which GOD was not ; so neither could any Instant be Conceiv'd in which He had not all His Perfections , and amongst them that of Knowing and Loving Himself ; and , consequently , in which his Divine Essence as an Object Known did not communicate it self to the Divine Knower of it . They may please to reflect too , that there are even amongst us many things before one another , nay , even as Causes and Effects , which are not so much as for one Instant before one another in Time. For Example : Bodies are therefore Passive because they have Matter in them ; they are Passive thus , or Divisible , because they have Quantity in them ; and Corruptible because they are Divisible ; nay , 't is also , in proper Speech True that the following ones proceed from those that are foregoing as their Causes ; and yet they have Passiveness , Quantity , Divisibility , Corruptibility , nay , Extension , Measurability , Proportionability , &c. in them all at one Time ; nay , they are all so perfectly Contemporaries , that there is not so much as one Instant in which Body has one of these and not all of them . Whence , for much better Reason may the Son proceed from the Father tho' they be both Coeternal . They will reply , That all these Effects proceed from Formal Causes , which may be conceiv'd not to pre-exist before one another . And I reply , That in this present Explication all the Divine Processions are put to be by the manner of Form , and not of Action or Efficiency ; and I much fear that their Transferring Action to GOD in their Thoughts , which implies Motion , drew them into this Misconceit of Priority after the manner of a kind of Imaginary Time. According to the way of discoursing which I take the Divine Object Inexists in the Divine Knowledge ; which , according to our Natural Notions is call'd Informing it . I have produced many Demonstrations both in the Second Preliminary to Solid Philosophy Asserted , and others ( B. I. Ch. 6. ) in my Metaphysicks , to show that our Knowledge can be only made by this , that the Object it self is in our Understanding or informs it , when we Know ; and that every Particular Knowledge we have is Specify'd , nay Individually Determin'd to be This , by the Object ; and must proceed from it both as to its being at all , and also as to it 's Being This. And I dare affirm , That let Witty Men beat their Brains till they are weary , they will never make any other Sense of what it is to Know , than this , That the Object Inexists in the Knowiag Power as Another Thing , or as some way Distinct from the Knower . Moreover , this Notion of Knowing abstracts from sooner or later , Eternal or Not-Eternal ; and therefore may , in this regard , be sitly Apply'd to GOD , who Knows Himself Eternally ; and because ( as has been often said ) this Knowledge comes from the Divine Object from all Eternity ; hence it is , and must be also said to Proceed or be Originiz'd from it from all Eternity : since he Formally becomes a Knower by means of that Object-Known . This is all the Priority Christian Divines acknowledge . This abstracts even in us Creatures ( I mean in Souls Separated and Angels , who in the First Instant Know Themselves ) from all other kinds of Priority . Whence 't is very weak to infer hence , that the Father is Prae-existent , as if there were any imaginable Instant in Eternity , in which the Father was , and the Son was not ; or that the Son for that reason , is not Self existent ; since , besides the want of such a Priority as they fancy and build their Objection upon it , all the Absolute Attributes of the Deity , and amongst them Self-Existence , and Eternity too , are Communicated to Him by , and in , the Divine Essence Known , or from the Father . S. Another Bugbear to their Fancy , ( for 't is That and not True Reason that gives the Ground to all their Objections ) is this ; That , by our Discourse , God the Father must communicate his Essence , and his whole Essence to the Son ; which they think is sufficiently overthrown by meerly asking , [ How should both have the same thing ? especially , How should He have it still who has already Communicated it , or Parted with it all ? ] And this looks very plausibly to those poor Ignorant Souls who never reflected on Spiritual Natures , but think we must discourse of them in the same manner as we do of Bodies ; whereas , they being of Contradistinct Na●ures , the quite Contrary follows . For the First , ●iz . That the Divine Essence is Communicated , or that as Known , ( that is , as it is by a Relative Name call'd the Father ) it communicates it self , let us see how it agrees with other Divine Attributes , and with such acknowledg'd Perfections as we find in Creatures . GOODNESS bears in it's Notion , ( and Experience teaches us the same ) that it is Naturally Communicative of what it has . Since then we ascribe INFINITE Goodness to GOD , and make it to be Essential to Him ; it follows that He is INFINITELY Communicative of the Nature or Essence which he has , or rather he is Actually and Eternally ( for he was Eternally Good ) Communicating it and this INFINITELY . Which how it can be Verify'd , or how his Exuberant Goodness could have an Adequate Object , unless he did Communicate Himself Infinitely in the manner abovesaid , is past the Wit of Man to imagine ; since all Communication of Being to Created Things , or Suppositums , tho' they were never so Excellent , or so Many , ( their Natures and their Number being both of them Finite ) is Infinitely short of His INFINITE Bounty or Goodness . 5. Again , Fecundity bears in it's Natural Notion a very High Perfection . We may observe , That all Living Creatures , when grown up to a consummate pitch in their respective Natures , are Fruitful or Prolifick ; that is , are apt to produce another of their own Kind . And Spiritual Natures , when they come to know , are said to Conceive , and our Knowledges are call'd [ Conceptions , ] tho' few reflect on the word , or the Analogy it bears to the Verbum in the Divine Mind , or to the Procession of the Son ; only our Conceptions of Natural Objects , are Imperfe●● and never arrive at their utmost Perfection till 〈…〉 see them in the First Cause . Since then these ar● some kind of Perfection in their several ways , 〈…〉 most Consonant to Reason that we should Transfe● the Notion of Fecundity too to GOD ; to whom , ●● being Infinitely Perfect , we ought to ascribe all sorts of Perfection , after they are stript from the Imperfections , and from their Limitedness which necessarily accompanies all Finite Beings , as has been often said above . 6. As for his Communicating his Whole Divine Essence , whence in Discourse with no small Man among the Deists , I have heard it inferr'd , that if the Father Communicates His WHOLE Essence , and all it's Attributes to the Son , He can leave nothing at all for Himself ; it is Evident that this Objection proceeds from most profound and most Gross Ignorance of Spiritual Natures . A Master may communicate all his Knowledge to His Scholler , or to such a degree as to make Him as Learned as Himself : Does it follow thence , that he has Empty'd or Disfurnisht himself of his whole Stock of Learning , and is become now an Ignorant Dunce ? But speaking of Objects , which is more to the Point : Even Material Objects lose nothing at all by being known . Suppose I could penetrate so ●horowly the Individuating Complexion of Accidents of such a Body in Nature , so that I comprehended every minute consideration that could possibly belong to it ; would that Body be ever the Worse or Diminisht in it self , because it is Wholly Known or Understood ? I desire those weak Reasoners to consider that as Spiritual Natures are above Quantity , so they do not follow the Rules of Material Beings , nor in discoursing of them ought we to take our Measures ●…om such Predicates or Sayings as we use when ●e speak of Bodies . Rather , [ Divisible ] and [ Indi●…sible ] which are their Differences that constitute ●…em , being Contradictories ; whatever Conceptions ●…e make of the One , the quite Opposite must be made of the Other , excepting only the Notion of the Common Genus [ Ens ] in which , and which only , they do bo●h of them agree . Nothing at all is Defalkt from Them by their Communicating themselves ; nor do they lose any thing even by Actiag upon Bodies . The Nerves of an Angel are not over-strain'd , nor their Spirits spent by Changing or Altering them : Nor are Spiritual Objects impair'd by their being thus Communicated . But 't is prodigiously weak to object this in our case , where the Discourse is of GOD's Knowing Himself , and where it is granted that He does so ; unless those Gentlemen think that the Word [ Himself , ] in that speech , does not signifie [ GOD ; ] or else they conceit that GOD is the Worse by Knowing Himself ; that is , the Worse for being Infinitely Perfect ; for in such Nonsense as this , all their Objections against the most B. Trinity , when driven home to their Principles , will be found to terminate . 7. Tho' I cannot but judge that enough has been said , both here , and indeed in divers places of this Treatise , to assert and manifest , that , notwithstanding this Distinction or Plurality of Persons , there is not the least Show of prejudicing the Unity of the GODHEAD ; yet it were not amiss to add one Consideration more , which will much surprise the Anti-Trinitarians , and be lookt upon by them as a most strange Paradox : which is , that the Unity of the GODHEAD is so far from being violated by a Trinity of Persons , that it is in divers regards better Strengthen'd by that Position . To show which I premise this Lemma ; That That Unity is Best which is every manner of way such , and not that which is not so : Whence follows that such a Compleat Unity in all Regards ought to be ascrib'd to the GODHEAD . Wherefore , since it has been by so many Demonstrations ( quoted and related to above ) prov'd , I hope beyond all possibility of Confute , that Knowledge consists in this , that the Nature Known , ( even tho' it be of a Material or Corporeal thing , which is of a contrary Nature to that of the Knower ) must , out of the very Notion of being Kn●wn , be One and the Same in the Knower as it is in it self : Likewise , since our Natural Notions do assure us , that Love is Spiritually Unitive of the Lover with the thing Loved ; and these ways of making the Divine Nature One with it self , are clearly Different from that of being an Infinite Actuality of Being , whence we deduced GOD's Metaphysical Unity in our Third Book of our Transnatural Philosophy ; it follows necessarily that the Deity had not been in so many Respects One , had He not ( per impossible ) Known and Lov'd Himself , that is , had there not been a Trinity of Persons , by which only He could be said to Know and Love Himself , as has been abundantly Deduced . Wherefore , since it belongs to the Divine Unity , to be Infinitely , and , consequently , every way such ; even out of this very consideration , secluding all others , there ought to be admitted a Trinity of Persons . SECT . IX . The Substance of the foregoing Explication , Recapitulated . 1. TO sum up the precedent Explication in short . Since GOD Knows and Loves Himself , there is in the Divine Nature what does Verifie both Knower and Known , Lover and Loved . Wherefore since each of these Pairs of Notions , they being relatively Opposite , have unavoidably some Distinction in them ; and being verify'd of GOD are in the Divine Nature , there is necessarily some Distinction in the Divine Nature . Again , since these Notions , which are Verify'd of GOD , and therefore ( since they cannot be thought to be Extrinsecal Denominations ) are really in Him , are Distinct , and not Common Notions to Many ; but each of them singular in it's self ; they must be Particulars , to which the word [ GOD ] is Common , and ( in some manner or other ) predicated of them all : There are therefore in GOD , ( in some Sense or other ) Distinct Particulars : As appears farther , because this Predication is made by the Copula [ Est , ] which Identifies those Particulars with the Common Predicate , ( GOD ; ) that is , signifies these Distinct Particulars are Intrinsecal to the Divine Nature , and not Apply'd to it Outwardly by our false or untoward manner of Conceiving it , but spring out of the very Nature of the Thing ( or Divine Nature ) truly Conceiv'd . Also , since what 's meant by the word [ GOD , ] must be conceiv'd to have All Perfections in it in the Line of Being , of which to be Subsistent , or a Suppositum , is One ; we must be forced to say , that what 's meant by the word [ GOD ] is not only Common in respect of those others , but also that 't is a Common Suppositum ; and , that it is the Common Suppositum which is Verify'd of all those Particulars . And , since it cannot be Verify'd or Predicated of them as a Genus or Species , because These do necessarily include Indetermination and Potentiality , which are Inconsistent with GOD's Purest Actuality ; therefore it must be Predicated of them after such a manner as is not Generical or Specifical , but in such a way as a Notion which is in One Line is predicated of such Notions as are conceiv'd to be Formally in Another . 2. These Particulars can be but Three , tho' there seems to be two Conjugations ( as it were ) of mutually Opposite Relations . Because Divine Love ought to proceed from the Greatest GOOD that can be conceiv'd to belong or be Connatural to GOD as He is of a Spiritual Nature ; viz. the Knowledge of Infinite Truth ; or , ( which is the same ) from Infinite or Divine Truth Known in the Divine Knowledge ; which amounts to this , that Divine Love proceeds from the Two other Particulars formally according to their Relations . Whence no Correlation can be from those other Persons to Divine Love which thus proceeds from them ; because Relation is Grounded on that which it Refers or Relates : It being then Evident , that whatever is the Ground of Relation , or Related , must be some Absolute Notion , and not such a one as is Relative ; it follows , that there cannot be any Correlation where the Immediate Ground is a Relative it self . 3. These Three Distinct Particulars , Verify'd of GOD , and therefore Truly in the Divine Nature , are properly to be called PERSONS ; because , ●here being no Accidents in GOD , there is no●hing in the Divine Nature to be Distinguish'd or ●articulariz'd but his Substance ; and Particulars ●n an Intelligent Substance , are properly called PER●ONS . There are therefore Three Persons in GOD. Amongst which , since Knowledge formally proceeds from an Object of the same Nature in both the Knower and thing Known ; and to communicate a Living Nature to another Living Particular , is to GENERATE ; hence this Procession is truly call'd GENERATION ; and therefore the Divine Object Known , from which Divine Knowledge thus proceeds , is truly ( tho' in a Spiritual Sense ) call'd a FATHER , and the Divine Knowledge a SON ; and the former of these is the First by way of Origin ; because Knowledge must be conceiv'd to proceed from the Object ; and not the Object , or Thing to proceed from the Knowledge , unless that Knowledge makes it to be , or Creates it , as the Divine Wisdom does Creatures . The Third Person is properly call'd Divine Love , because Love proceeds from that which is our Greatest and most Connatural Good , perfectly and expresly Known , or ( as we phrase it ) conceited , ( or fully conceiv'd ) to be such . Now the Greatest Good of GOD who is of a Spiritual Nature , is Essential TRUTH , which ( as was said ) consists in this , that GOD knows Himself ; or ( which is the same ) that the Divine Object is in the Divine Knower : By which is seen How and Why the Holy Ghost , who is Divine Love , proceeds from both the Father and the Son. 4. Wherefore , since , as appears by those oftrecited Words on which we build our Explication , the Common Suppositum , exprest by the word [ GOD ] has in it All the Perfections that can be imagin'd , and this Infinitely ; hence all the Three Persons having the common Suppositum , or the GODHEAD , in them , are Coeternal , Co-omnipotent , &c. and in every respect Co-equal , as is exprest in ihe Creed of St. Athanasius . Whence all Objections of their being before one another for some Time , or some Instant , as also of Dependence on one another ; and all Distinction in Nature , or imagin'd Plurality of Gods ; are Diametrically opposite to the Doctrine of the Trinity . Lastly , hence all pretended Arguments taken from Fancy ( for , from True Reason none at all can be drawn ) are , by the respective parts of this Explication , shewn to be frivolous , and either Answer'd , or else Forestall'd and Prevented . 5. If the Anti-Trinitarians have any Objections in their Quiver , I have set them here a fair Mark , at which they may level them . They may see here , that I do not wrap my Discourse in Ambiguity of words ; but I distinguish my Notions as exactly as is possible , and draw my Conclusions consequently : Nor have I any Deductions which are nor grounded on Principles . But I foresee that they will not be able to raise any Opposition which is not built on Faneies , taken from Material Beings , which are too grofs to be made use of when we are discoursing of GOD , and altogether unfit to be Transferr'd , in their rude sense , to so sublime a Majesty ; or else that they are occasion'd by perfect Ignorance of Spiritual Natures and their Operations . The main Distinction between which and Bodies is this , that , whereas Bodies being Divisible Entitites , can have nothing in them ( Matter supposed ) but their own Accidents or Modes , which Determine the Matter thus or thus , and thence , make it this or the other Individuum , so that a Corporeal Suppositum or Thing can have nothing in it but its own Nature , and its own Intrinsical Modes which have no Being but Its : A Spiritual Being , ( which is so far Superiour to it , that it is constituted by its Difference , [ Indivisible ] which is of a ( Contradictory Nature to it , ) can , therefore , by its Proper Operation , [ Knowing , ] have all other Essences or Natures in it besides its own , and engraft them ( as it were ) on its Stoek of Being ; and in such a different manner from the former , that , as they are in It , they are no Part , or proper Mode , of the Spiritual Nature it self , nor any Intrinsical Accidents of it ; but they are there formally as Others , or as Distinct from it ; nor are they Dependent on the Spiritual Nature that Knows them , for their Being , as were the Corporeal Modes on their Subject ; but they have a Proper Being of their own out of the Understanding , and Independently on it . So likewise when they have an Act of Love , they have a Propension , Tendency , or Panting after the Object of that Love , and an endeavour to be Conjoyn'd and United to it by way of Attainment or Fruition of the Good they conceive to be in it : Whence 't is plain that they are carry'd to it as it is Another , or as 't is Distinct from themselves . So that even when an Angel , or a Soul , Knows and Loves its self , they must , in some Respect or other , be Distinct from themselves , as they are the Object of that Knowledge and Love ; as the very word [ Object ] does Evidence ; and as manifestly appears from the Antithesis between Knower and Known , Lover and Loved . Only , because ( as was shown above ) in Creatures , which are not Self-Beings , this Knowledge , ( and consequently Love ) are Accidental to them , in regard that even their Existence ( which this Knowledge and Love presupposes ) is Extrinsical and Accidental to their Essence ; therefore this Distinction which Self-Knowledge and Self-Love makes in them , and which is the Immediate Ground of those Relations , cannot make Distinction in their Substance : Whereas in GOD , in whose Essence there can be no Accidents , nor any thing Accidental , but purely Substance ; Self-Knowledge and Self-Love must necessarily Distinguish , and , consequently , Particularize the Substance ; and hence Particulars of a Substance which is Intelligent , being , in proper Speech , call'd Persons , it obliges us to put a TRINITY of PERSONS in the same Divine Nature , or in the UNITY of the GODHEAD . 6. Perhaps it may be Objected , That I am inconsistent with my self , while I say , that there are no Accidents in GOD ; and therefore only His Substance is Particulariz'd ▪ whence we infer Plurality of Persons ; and yet , we put Relation in GOD which is an Accident . I answer , ( that ) as appears by our State of the Question , we do not put Relations in GOD , as He is in Himself , but only as He is Conceiv'd by us ; and that , as we conceive Him according to our Natural Notions , it is impossible to conceive , or speak of Him otherwise . To the Objection 't is Reply'd , that we do not Transfer the Notion of Relation to GOD without stripping it first of its Imperfection which is to inhere in GOD as in its Subject , or as a Mode of it ; which implies Potentiality in the Subject , and Dependence on it in the Form. We have already shown that Relation , ( meerly as Relation ) does add no Perfection or Imperfection to that on which 't is Grounded , and which has an Absolute Notion : As Likeness between two Things that are White , adds in neither of them the least Perfection or Imperfection to their Absolute Notion ; that is , it makes neither of them more or less White . Wherefore the Relations in GOD are as Essential to Him as is the Knowing and Loving Himself , which Grounds these Relations . Nor is this Peculiar in the Relative Notions we apply to GOD ; for Mercy , Justice , Goodness , &c. and the rest of such Attributes are Qualities in us , and exprest as such ; and yet they are Essential to the DEITY ; and have their Natures which they had as Accidents , Dignify'd to be several Inadequate Conceptions of the Divine Essence it self . SECT . X. Of what vast Importance and most Efficacious Influence the Belief of the Blessed TRINITY is to Christian Life , and to the raising our Thoughts and Affections towards Heaven . 1. I Doubt not but the Anti-Trinitarians will complain sadly of the Christian Church as barbarously Uncharitable , for cutting off from the Body of their Society , Excommunicating and delivering over to Satan so many well-meaning Persons who embrace their Sentiment . They will ask why the Denying a Tenet , which is meerly Speculative , should be so hainously taken and severely resented ? They will be apt to liken Church-Governours to those hot-headed School-Divines who all-to-be-Heretick those who will not allow their Opinion . They will pretend that , as long as Men do sincerely Worship the only True GOD , and keep His Commandments ( which they will profess they do from their Hearts hold and intend ) no more can in reason be requir'd . Is not this enough , will they say , for Salvation ? Must the Seamless Coat of Christ be torn and shatter'd to pieces , Charity and Church-Communion be violated in the height , for the sake of a Speculative Tenet ; which , however it may please some , can sute with the Fancies of very Few ; perhaps None , if they would but lay aside their Customary Belief , which Education and not Judgment has given them ; and set themselves seriously to reflect how Uncouth it is to their Reason , and how utterly Unuseful , Ineffectual , and of no Influence at all , it is to Good Life , Piety , and Virtuous Action . Thus they will plead for their Impious Doctrine , and Schismatical Fact ; and their Apology will be receiv'd with Applause , by all the Latitudinarian Party . For nothing is so Cheap , and Costs so little , and withal is so Necessary for those who are destitute of Solid Reasons , as 't is to Affect and have Recourse to Godly Cant , 2. In Answer , First , we will speak to the Persons , and their Guilt or Innocence ; then to the Point it self . We ask then those Rabbies of the Anti-Trinitarians , Who taught them that piece of Doctrine , which they proceed upon as if it were a a Self-evident Principle , that the way to determine what we are to Believe , what not , is to begin our Enquiry by scanning the Articles of Faith themselves , by our Common and Obvious Reason ; and to make This the Test of what we are to Accept , what to Reject . For , First , they cannot but see ●hat this takes away the very Notion of Faith out ●f the Hearts of Mankind . I suppose by [ Reason ] ●hey mean Evident Reason , for otherwise they ●ust grant that this Rule of theirs is Uncertain , ●nd therefore can be no Rule at all . And , if they will not believe but upon Evident Reason , then 't is Science ; and so farwell all Faith. Secondly , If they say they intend only to Evidence the Opposite Tenet to be False , and not any Point of Faith to be True ; we are but where we were . For , where the Tenets in Question are Contradictories , as 't is here ; he that Evidences the Trinity of Persons in the GODHEAD to be False , does , with the same Labour , and at the same time , Evidence the Unity of Person in the same GODHEAD to be True : Since then this later is a Point of Faith with them , they must still grant that , by Evidencing this , they turn Faith into Science . Thirdly , This Tenet , amongst others , was held by themselves , e're they renounc'd it , to have come to them by Divine Revelation ; wherefore , they are convinced , by recurring to this New Rule of Humane Reason , to bid adieu to all Divine Revelation ; and , so , they fall in with the Deists ; For , why should one Point of Faith be received upon their Rule of Humane Reason , and not All. Fourthly , They are False to their own Rule , and their own Pretence ; and therefore are not to be Credited , nor without some straining of Charity , to be excus'd as to their having Sincere Intentions . An Evident Proof can be no other but a clear Demonstration , and to this I have not observ'd they ever so much as pretended . 'T is easie to call any pretty probable Proof an Evidence , so it be but sutable to Fancy : But Demonstration carries something that is Manly , Decisive and Victorious in its Notion ; to which therefore 't is dangerous for Plausible and Probable Discoursers to pretend . A True Demonstration must be built on Principles that are Evident , and finally reducible to Self-Evidence : So must the Consequence of it too , and the Medium must be such as is most necessarily Connected with the two Extremes . What I affirm then is , that they have not Produc'd so much as One Demonstration , ( however they would have it ●hought they have , ) though they cautiously mince it in the Expression . If they have any such let us see it , let us hear of it . I will grant them that any One , which is truly such , will conclude the Point , and carry the Cause . They have seen my Explication , what Grounds I proceed upon , and what Principles I build on . Wherefore , to make short work of it , I send them a flat Challenge to produce this one Demonstration of theirs against this Mystery . Half a Sheet of Paper will conclude the whole Controversie , as far as it depends on the way of Humane Reason ; to which they have appeal'd from Divine Revelation , and from the Iudgment and Doctrine of the Christian Church . If they be Sincere , they will put it to the Tryal ; if they refuse , they give themselves to be Guilty of persisting voluntarily in an Errour , and manifest that they took up this Pretence of Evident Reason for a Stale to draw after them the Ignorant and Unstable ; but that they do not think it their Interest to stand to the Rule themselves have espoused . Fifthly , By renouncing this Fundamental of Christian Faith , they have , by Consequence , invalidated all Christian Faith , by denying the Certainty of the Ground of All Faith. For this was held by the Christian Church upon some Ground ; which , by their Recession as to this Point , they have Renounc'd ; and by consequence , have brought all Christian Faith into a Groundless Uncertainty . Lastly , By their Denial of this Article , they accuse the Christian Church of being Idolatrous , in the most Fundamental Article of her Faith , and in the greatest part of her Worship , in Adoring so constantly , heartily and devoutly , a Man for GOD , and a Creature for the Dread Creatour . 3. To summe up then this whole Discourse . If the taking away the Notion of all Faith , and turning it into Science . If to renounce , by Consesequence , Divine Revelation , which none but Deists professedly Oppose . If the Injury done to Humane Reason , ( besides the misapplying it ) and the Fourbe put upon weak Souls , in setting up for Evident Reasoners , without offering so much as One Argument which is in true Speech Evident , or Conclusive ; If the undermining the Ground on which all Faith is built , as to our Knowledge of it . Lastly , If the accusing their former Superiours , the Church-Governours , so many Venerable , Learned , and Holy Fathers of the C●urch , and even so many General and Provincial Councils ; nay , the Christian Church it self , of most Gross Idolatry , Blasphemy and Prophaneness , may be thought sufficient Provocation and Plea for the Governours of the Christian Church to Excommunicate and Declare , That they ( who were by their Office the Depositaries to whom the Preserving of Christ's Faith was committed , ) would have no more to do with such Men who had voluntarily gone out from the Church ; and who , should they be permitted still to remain in her , would hazard to infect with their Contagious Doctrine and Practice the Sounder Faithful . If these things , I say , be manifestly so , then the Church and her Governours are Acquitted , and the Blame and Guilt lie evidently at their Doors : This is the true Point to be Decided . Which , I believe every Man of Common Sense , were they of the Jury , would quickly determin , without needing to go from the Bar to debate it , or consider of it . 4. But this is not all that may be alledg'd against them ; There seems moreover , to be imply'd in their Discourses , that the most perfect Law and most Elevating Principles of Christianity are no better than that most Imperfect State of the Law of Nature , which rais'd Men to no higher a pitch than that of meer Moral Honesty ; in which divers of the Antient Heathens excell'd many Christians . What Necessity was there , in such a case , that Christ our Saviour should come amongst us , take such pains in Preaching and working Miracles , Suffering a most Cruel Death on the Cross , Rising again from the Dead , Ascending into Heaven , and Sending His H. Spirit , & c ? Certainly , it had been very Preposterous to have laid so many Supernatural , Extraordinary and Prodigious Means , to compass such an End , as was within the Power of Nature , without Miraculous or Supernatural Assistance , to atchieve . 5. This shews their sleight Opinion of the Christian Law. the Nature of it's Principles and the Efficacy of the Motives it proposes ; which was intended by God's Wisdom to purifie in the best manner the hearts of the Faithful , and to raise them to the Love of Heaven by the most Powerful Means Infinite Goodness and Mercy could contrive . To apprehend better how highly GOD's Revelation of ●●e B. Trinity conduces to Mankind's Salvation , and ●o cultivate our Minds with Theological Virtues , which are the only Dispositions to attain it ; let us consider how GOD's Revealing Himself to us , as to those Attributes of Mercy , Justice , Goodness , Omnipotence , Holiness , &c. did and does promote Virtue , in the Church , and thence estimate what large Accessions the Belief of the B. Trinity does superadd to them . If GOD had not been represented to us , and believ'd by us to be Iust , what Sinner would not have run on in Sin , presuming He was Unconcern'd in Sublunary Actions , and would never call him to account for his Sins ? Or , if he held him severely Iust and not Merciful , what poor Creature , conscious to himself how often he had grievously Offended Him , would not Despair of Pardon , think all was irrecoverably lost , and thence run forwards headlong in Sinning ; wanting Encouragement , or Hope of any Favour , in case he should return , and repent ? Who would at all Love Him , if he did not think Him Good ; Believe in Him if He were not Veracious ; or Trust in Him if He were not Faithful and Powerful ? Or , lastly , Who would care to lead a Holy Life , if He deem'd that GOD was not Holy Himself ? So that all sorts of the Best Virtues , Faith , Hope , and Charity , would be banisht out of the Thoughts of all Mankind , if GOD had not Reveal'd Himself to them under the Notions of these several ●ivine Attributes . 4. Let us now consider what incomparably Higher Advances in Virtue the Doctrine of the B. Trinity , and all the Train of Innumerable and most Powerful Motives which depend on it , as on their Principle , do superadd to the Former now mention'd , all tending , of their own Nature ; to pur● our Souls , and to raise them to the highest pitch o● Perfection . They are so many , and each of them so pregnant , that I must content my self to Select only a Few , and leave them to be meditated on at leasure . What Man , who believes that GOD the Father sent his Only Son , Coequal and Coeternal with Himself , to take our Nature upon Him , to teach us the True Way to Heaven ; to suffer Hardships , Persecutions , blasphemous Revilings ▪ nay , to be Buffetted , Scourg'd , Crown'd with Thorns , and suffer such a cruel and ignominious Death on the Cross ; and all this to pay the ransom for our Sins , and rescue poor Wretched Mankind out of the Jaws of Hell and Eternal Death ; and by this means to court our Love , that by Loving Him we might be Happy : What Man , I say , can seriously and thorowly reflect on this , and not to be Transported with Admiration and Love of so Infinite a Goodness ? What Soul ▪ tho' never so Wicked and Senseless , who , with a full consideration , lays this to Heart , will not melt with Love at such a Transcendent Mercy to a Sinful World ? Who can chuse but be Astonisht , even to an Extasie , at such a Generous Goodness ? Who can be so Ungrateful as wilfully to offend and disoblige so kind a Benefactor ? Who will not tremble at the Iustice of so Pure a GOD , and reflect on the Hatred he bears to Sin , who punisht it so severely in his own Son , who had taken upon Him to bear the Curse of it ? What heart would not break in the midst of all Temptations , rather than Crucifie again so dear a Saviour ? Who would stick to pardon an Enemy for his sake , who had not only pardon'd us while we were his Enemies ; but , moreover , heapt all the ●●●●est Benefits of his Mercy upon us , even while we were such , tho' it cost him so dear ? Who would not Love and Hope in such an Indulgent Father who so tenderly lov'd us ; and a Suffering GOD who , at the Infinite Expence of His most Precious Blood , Redeem'd us ; and in Both of them , who to Crown all their Favours , sent the Holy Ghost , GOD , Coequal with themselves , to Sanctifie with a thousand Blessed Effects the Hearts of the Faithful , to strengthen them in Afflictions and Temptations , to inspire them with Charity , the Source of all heavenly Virtues , to the end of the World ; and to dwell spiritually in our Hearts for ever ? 5. Here are Motives of another kind of size than either the Law of Nature , or the Empty Elements of the Mosaick Law could afford us , or even give us a glimpse of ; Here are Means of raising Souls effectually to Love of Heaven , in comparison of which all the rest are Flat and Dull , and , in comparison , Trifles , or rather meer Nothing . Yet these Men who would bereave the World of these , by Denying the Mystery of the B. Trinity on which all these are grounded , expect they should be kindly treated as Brethren ; while they , for their Whimsies of Fancy , bereave all the Faithful in GOD's Church of these highest Spiritual Advantages ; which every sensible Man cannot but see would both dispose them strongly for Heaven ; and bring to Salvation innumerably - more Souls ; and advance those who do go thither , to higher Degrees of Bliss , and make them more Glorious Stars in the Firmament of the Heavenly Hierusalem . What I wonder at , is , That these Gentlemen do not plant their Batteries against the Belief of the B. Trinity , upon the Incredibility of such wonderful Condescensions and ( as they might pretend ) Debasements of th● DEITY , than against the Speculative Truth of the Point it self . None of those Prodigious Mercies but transcend our F●ncy , whence all their other Arguments are drawn , ( for which reason the Greeks esteem'd Christianity Foolishness , ) and therefore might afford them more plausible Arguments than any they have brought hitherto . Had they employ'd their Talent in impugning the Trinity upon that score , and ply'd that Topick , I must confess I had been to seek for any other Answer , than to alledge , that GOD is INFINITE , in all His Attributes ; which he had not been , at least we could not so well have known it , had not he given us such Testimonies of His Mercy , Goodness , Justice , &c. as are beyond all that we are able to conceive . Wherefore , since what 's beyond what we are able to conceive is justly held Mysterious to us , all the Mysteries of our Faith , if things be well consider'd , and driven up to their First Root or Principle , do spring from GOD's Infinity in this or some such Regard . Even the Mystery of the B. Trinity , which chiefly consists in this , that the same Numerical Nature is in Three Distinct Persons , is grounned on this , that His Nature being Infinite is but One , as is shown above , B. 3. and the same may be said of all the rest of those Articles of our Faith which we account Mysteries . Wherefore , I would recommend it to the Author of Christianity not Mysterious , that He would bless us w●th a Treatise to show us how to comprehend INFINITY ; how to Define it , or give us it 's Full Dimensions ; for all we know of it hitherto is to distinguish it's Notion from [ Finite , ] by a Negation ; but to make a true Conception of it's Entire Positive Perfection we fall infinitely short . Let ●im then either do this , or else , as long as GOD , ●e Author of our Faith , is Unconceiveable by us , or ●NFINITE , so long that Faith it self , the Product of His Infinite Being , and His other Attributes , ( especially those which concern His own Essence ) ●ill still be Impossible to be comprehended by us ; and so , Christianity will still remain Mysterious , let him scrib●le his plausibe Conceits as long as he pleases . But , to proceed with showing the Demerit of those scarce-half-quarter Christians . 6. Let us next consider what Powerful Authority and Majesty it must give to the whole Doctrine of Christianity , and to every Particular of it ; What Veneration and Esteem to the Holy Sacraments instituted by Christ ; to every Sentence which is recorded in the Holy Scripture to have been spoken by our B. Saviour ; and to every Action said to have been done by Him ; to believe that it was GOD Himself who came down from Heaven to teach us that Doctrine , institute those Sacraments ( from which Institution they have all their Efficacy ) who spoke those Words of Eternal Life , and did those Actions in his own Person . Infinite are the Particular Motives of this Nature , and beyond any Man's Power to recount and lay open at large as he ought ; all of them ●ending to rectifie our Irregular Passions , to arm us against Temptations , and sanctifie our Souls by raising them to a Firm Faith , a Stedfast Hope and Ardent Charity ; the only Dispositions which can fit Mankind for Eternal Happiness . Were all these Particulars laid open and dilated upon , to their full Energy , in Affective Sermons , ( as they are daily , to a great measure , ) in the Christian Church ; what Transports of Heavenly Love , and Affectionate Devotion must they needs make in the hearts of the Hearers , to th● End of the World ; what innumerable Pio● Thoughts must they excite ; how many Actions o● all sorts of Virtue must they produce ? Not to speak how vigorously it must move People of all sorts to the Imitation of those Heroick Virtues , which the Life and Practice of a GOD made Man sets before their Eyes , for Patterns by which they ought to frame their Christian Conversation ; the very Notions of which , confronted with the contrary demeanour of frail Sinners , is of force to shame them into Repentance and Amendment of their Lives . 7. Now , the main Efficacy and Powerfulness of all these Highest Motives to true Sanctity depends on the Belief of Three Divine Persons in the Unity of the GODHEAD . Take this away , GOD the Father could not send his Son who was also GOD ; nor could GOD , in his own Person , come amongst us , to teach and instruct us by His Word and Example ; nor Die and Suffer for our Sins ; nor Arise again for our Justification ; nor Ascend into Heaven , to draw our Hearts and Affections after Him , &c. Let , now , the Deniers of a Trinity , put a meer Man , ( however endow'd ) instead of a GOD ; and Common Sense will tell themselves , and every Considering Man , how Feeble , Languid , and Ineffectual all these Motives to Holy Life had been , in comparison of what they would be if all these most Endearing Obligations had been laid upon us immediately by GOD Himself . And , can they then expect the Christian Church Governours can do less than deny them the right hand of Fellowship and Communion , who , in matters of the Highest Concern , do thus prejudice the Common Spiritual Good of that Community ? 8. If the Authors of the Letter concerning the ●inity and the Athanasian Creed , be sincere in their Profession , that they intend no more but to get Light and Information to promote their Eternal Hap●●●●ss , I desire they would please to ask themselves ●●ese Questions , and let their own Consciences answer them . Did not GOD intend that the Law of Grace should put Souls in the Purest and Best State that can be , next to that of Glory in Heaven which immediately succeeds it ; and , consequently , that it has the Best Means in it that can be to promote the Eternal Happiness of Mankind ? Next , Is not the Belief that GOD sent His only Son to Die for our Sins , that GOD the Son did die for us , and in his proper Person taught us His Heavenly Doctrine , and led such a most Perfect Life amongst us for our Example ; and the many other Tenets and Motives consequent from these ; I say , Are not these Better Means of Eternal Salvation , and more Effectual to raise our Thoughts to an Affectionate Love of Him , to Trust in His Mercy , to follow His Dectrine , and imitate His Holy Life , than if a meer Man , a Creature , and therefore infinitely short of His Divine Majesty , had been sent for that purpose ? Now , if they grant These , then they must acknowledge , that the Doctrine of the Trinity , upon which all these Advantages are Grounded , being the Best Means , or rather the Principle , on which these Best Means for Virtue are Built , must be acknowledg'd to be True. I am far from thinking that Ignorance is the Genuine Mother of Devotion : much less , that Errour , especially so shameless an Errour , as is nothing but Nonsense and Contradiction ; nay , such an Idolatrous Errour as gives Divine Honour to a Creature , should be so great a Friend to Piety , and Devotion , and so Effectual and Proper ( as we have seen this is ) to beget in Souls such Purity of Heart , as is apt to cultivate them with all sorts of the Best Virtues , and raise them so effectually to Heaven ; nay , incomparably more Effectually than the Contrary Tenet , if ( as they hold ) it be True , could possibly Effect . I have not time at present to pursue the Confutation of that Pamphlet : But , if any farther Reply shall be judg'd Needful than what Mr. Frankland has already given it , my Endeavours shall be ready to Defend so Great a Fundamental of Christian Faith. In the mean time , I shall presume that whoever peruses attentively this present Explication , shall find that all their Objections are either Defeated or Prevented . I only remark , that all their Opposition is built either upon their Ignorance of a Spiritual Nature ; or else on their not distinguishing exactly the Notions or Meanings of the words of which they make use ; which I have done as accurately as I could possibly in my Method to Science , and in my Preliminaries here . For , 't is very easie to observe , that they Confound the Notion of Substance or Being with that of Relation ; Positive with Relative ; Nature with Suppositum . They quarrel with the word [ Person , ] which is a plain Natural Notion ; and yet themselves do not tell us what it should mean ; as if they who oppose it were not also oblig'd to acquaint the Reader what it is , or signifies , as well as we ; since otherwise , they must confess they oppose they know not what . They build mainly on that weak Topick that some Divines have differ'd about their Explications of it ; ●s if every Thesis whatever did not Abstract from ●ll Explications . The Tenet it self was Antece●ent , and the Explications Superven'd ; and therefore the Article it self is still but where it was , and stands firm upon its proper Basis , Divine Revelation , though They , I , and all other Explicators in the World were never so Faulty . But my Appendix grows too Bulky , and 't is time to close it . SECT . Last . That the Anti-Trinitarians cannot satisfie any Man of Common Sense . 1. BUT what shall the Unlearned Vulgar do in the mean time ? On the one side they see the Opposers of the Trinity do bear themselves high , in pretending Evidence against it ; and that they offer many plausible and seeming Reasons , which they are not able to Solve ; and the Replies of Learned Men are perhaps too Speculative for those of their pitch . How , then , and in what manner , ought they to bear themselves ? Their Reason is startled and dissatisfied ; and consequently , their Conscience ; when it is confidently Pretended , and offer'd to be Prov'd , that the embracing this Tenet obliges them to acknowledge more GODS than One ; which both sides grant to be Perfect Idolatry . I Answer , and offer to them these Considerations . 2. And , First , I would ask them of what Religion or Profession they were when they first Read those Books , or listen'd to those Discourses which startled them in the Belief of a Trinity ▪ Had they any Faith at all before , or were they mere Infidels , or Seekers : If they had any Faith ; then they had some Ground for that Faith , and held that Ground Certain , as the Ground of Faith ought to be ; and then they stand oblig'd by Evident Reason , either to see that Ground invalidated and overthrown , or to continue where they are . Now , this Opposing the Point it self by way of Pretended Reason does not at all combat their Ground of Believing thus , but brings Foreign Objections against the Particular Article , which is a kind of Conclusion from that Ground ; that is , it lets the Principle alone , and attacques the Conclusion , which is manifestly an Indirect way of Proceeding , and withal Foolish : For , if the Principle stands , what 's bulit on that Principle will stand too , let Objections say what they please . Besides Grounds and Principles , have something of Solid in their Meen and Notion ; and ought always ( and generally do ) subsist upon Settled Iudgment , and Right Reason ; whereas Objections are almost always the Product of Fancy , which is a Volatil , Roving and Unsettled Faculty , ever Wayward , Humours●me , and Unsatisfied ; and of so Unconstant a Nature it self , that 't is incapable of settling any Principle at all . 3. Again , a very ordinary Experience in the World will teach them ▪ that Lawyers plead very plausible for contrary Causes , and sometimes Preachers for contrary Opinions ; so that it is not every seeming . Reason which we cannot readily Answer , though it may look very Plausible , that ought to shock us , or make us entertain an ill Opinion of our Principle it self . But , it must be such a Solid Reason as may be held more Evident than the Principle was on which they , and the Body or Community they were in , had built their former Faith ; otherwise it cannot with any Sense be held able to cope or contrast with it , much less to overthrow it . 4. They ought , I say , in such a Case , to consider that they were formerly in a Christian Community , or in some Church , and were Actually Members of that Body , from which they must separate ; and so be guilty of a very Criminal Schism , if they divide themselves by Apostacy from it : which makes it plain to the meanest Capacity , that the Reasons which are oppos'd , ought to be most Evident , and most Cogent . This ought to make them cautious and wary in admitting such Objections for true Reasons ; lest , if they hap to be prov'd False , they run themselves desperately into such a dangerou● Precipice . Wherefore they must be Certain those Reasons were indeed most Evident , ( which we call Demonstrative ) and not only Probable , by Resting on which they hazard such a Mi●chief to their Souls . Plainest Reason tells them , that no Truth in the World could remain long settled , nor any Government continue long on Foot , if the Subjects , or Inferiours , may be allowed upon every Probable Reason , to break from the whole Body , and Rebel against Superiours and Governours . Now , not to mention that they can never bring any such Proof , as can in the Esteem of a Vulgar Understanding be held Conclusive , or Demonstrative ; it is Evident by the Carriage of the Rabbi●s of those Dissenters , that they never did even pretend to bring any Demonstrative Proof against the Trinity . For did they ever lay any Self-Evident Principles , or build on them , as those to which those Proofs are finally reducible ? 'T is unheard of ; and yet without these , 't is impossible there can be any True Evidence , or Demonstration . For , whatever pretends to be Evident , must either be Evident of it self , or be made Evident by something that is moro Evident than it self is ; which must either run on Endlesly , or terminate at length in something that is Self-Evident . A Demonstration , if truly such , and clearly propos'd . obliges all Humane Nature to assent to it , if they be Unprejudic'd . If they can pretend they have any such Demonstrative Argument that the Doctrine of the Trinity is such Nonsense , and so Impious , why do they not produce it , stand to it , show the Principle it is grounded on , and the Connexion it has with that Principle . One such Argument would decide the Cause , and put an end to the Whole Controversie . But , alas ! they dare not so much as say , ( I am sure they never did ) that they have any such kind of Argument . They never concern themselves with examining the Qualification of Arguments , or what Proofs Conclude , what not ; but content themselves to talk rawly , prettily , and plausibly . 'T is not their Design to convince Men of Learning , but to Over-reach and work upon the Weakness of the Ignorant . Whence follows that , since no Proof can be even pretended competent to break Church-Communion , but such as is evidenty Conclusive , or Demonstrative , and they neither produce , nor profess to bring any sue● , their Reasons ought not to weigh with any Man of Sense , so as to make him , for their sake , hazard the Guilt of Schism . 5. They ought to consider next , when they have left the Particular Church in which they were , and in which there are Church-Governours , and a great Body of Christians with whom they do joyn in Faith , Prayer , Sacraments , Discipline , and other Spiritual Duties ; with what Church-Governours , and what Body of Men they will joyn in Prayer , and such Devout Offices . Can a few Men scatter'd here and there , who sculk in Corners , do not own themselves openly , nor barefacedly protest and preach against this Doctrine , which ( if False ) is so manifestly Idolatrous ; can , I say , such a Rope of Sand , such an Unconnected Multitude , who thus let GOD's Honour go to wrack , have the Face , or the least show of a Church ? With whom then will these New Proselytes joyn hemselves in Prayet , Sacraments , Church-Government , and other such Concerns ? This is so shameful to their pretended Church , that though 't is against all Conscience and Sense , they are content to joyn in Prayer and other Religious Duties with our Churches , ( though themselves must hold them most abominably Idolatrous ) rather than make a ridiculous show of their own Party alone . Perhaps too , Interest and Indemnity are two powerful Motives to induce them to this Brotherly Compliance and Correspondence : For such Men do not use to be guilty of such a Zeal for GOD's Honour , or for their own Persuasion , as to hazard Martyrdom , no not the less of any Temporal Advantages for GOD's or Truth 's sake . They are cast in a new Mold from that of other good Christians , and approach to the Deists , as in other Prudent Methods , so in this . 6. If those Unstable and Dissatisfy'd Men say they are not able to Judge whether the Reasons they bring are Conclusive or no ; they plainly confess they hanker after them out of the bewitching Humour of Singularity , and Novelty ; since they consent to alter their Former Faith upon such Reasons as they know not whether they be Good or Bad , Solid or Aiery , fit to be yeilded to or no : That is in plain Terms , they have an Inclination to that Party , but yet they do not well know why . If they alledge that their Reasons seem more easie to them than those brought by others : I Answer , First , That Easiness is not a sign of Truth . The Highest Truths , especially those belonging to Spiritual Natures , are the Hardest to conceive , and yet not a jot the less True. 'T is easier to conceive GOD to be a Body , and perform all his Actions by Motion , as we do ours ; and yet it is so far from True , that it is a damnable Errour , and destroys the Nature of the DEITY . Or rather it is a vast Prejudice against all their Arguments , and their very Way of Arguing : For , tho' each single word , in which Faith was deliver'd , was easie , so that the then Believers could have a right Apprehension , or Notion of what was taught them ; yet , when the Point comes to be canvast by Disputation , and Reasons produc'd Pro and Con , and that the Point is of what passes in the Divine Nature , which is not only Spiritual , but Infinite ; 't is a certain sign , that , if the Reasons either Party produces be Easie to Vulgar Fancies ; 't is , I say , a most certain sign , that they are merely Superficial , and do not reach the Nature of so abstruse a Mystery , or so High a Subject . 7. They may also be made sensible how impossible it is , that 318 Bishops of the Eastern and Western Churches should meet together in the First Council of Nice ; ( who by their Station must needs know the Sentiment of the then Christian Church ; ) and there Decree and Subscribe to the Doctrine of the Trinity , and propose a Formal Creed , what every Man ought to believe in that Article . Those Bishops could not be thought to act herein against their Conscience ; nor could any ever impeach their Sanctity , so as to make them such a pack of Villains as wilfully to Damn themselves , and all those Souls they had Influence over , by Defining that a Creature was truly GOD. Add , that neither could they be Ignorant of the Doctrine and Practice of the foregoing Church from Christ's time . Their Session was not much more than 300 Years after the Birth of our Saviour ; allowing then about 30 Years for our Saviour's Life-time , and 25 ( more or less ) for the Apostles Lives after his Death , and 50 for the Lives of those Bishops e're they met ; it was easie for their Great Grand-fathers ; nay , divers of their Grand-fathers , and also for the Grand-fathers of many in that Age , to have liv'd in the times of the Apostles ; and it was utterly Incredible there should be such a Change in Faith , so Universally and far spread , and none know who first introduced it , and were the chiefest Instruments in propagating it ; and a thousand times harder to conceive that it should not be vigorously oppos'd till Arius his time . Besides , their Devotions , and Adoration of Christ could not but go along with their Faith ; and who can without Madness imagine , that an Universal Change of such a Practice in so high a Point as the joyning a False GOD with a True one , a Creature with a Creatour , in their Adoration , could possibly creep into the World and diffuse itself over the Church , and yet should never be Observ'd and Oppos'd , when it first appear'd . 8. Moreover , since these Doubters were brought up amongst Christians , they cannot but know how highly Faith , Hope , and Charity , which were ever held the Best-of Supernatural Virtues , are necessary to promote Souls in Holiness , raise their Thoughts and Affections vigorously to Heaven , and thence conduce to their Salvation . Wherefore , by our former Discourse , they must needs see how those Virtues are enfeebled , and the Best Motives to erect their Souls to Heaven are made flat and Insignificant ( in comparison ) by the Denying this Mystery : And , consequently , since Errour can never be a Friend to Piety , that that Tenet is True. Nay , they must be conscious to themselves , that , by Denying it , they bereave themselves of the most effectual Means to elevate their Souls to Hope and Love of Heaven , which is the only Disposition that can bring them thither . Those well-meaning Men are born in hand by their Deluders , that , by dis-believing the B. Trinity , it is but one Point they deny ; but that they may , and do , nevertheless , stand right in all the rest . But they are Abus'd . Whoever denies the Trinity , does , by consequence , deny all other Tenets , and enervates all the Motives that are Peculiar to Christianity as such , or as it superadds to the Law of Nature and that of Moses ; as might easily be shown in every Article of our Creed , ( were it Seasonable to make so long an Excursion , ) and how it is , one way or other , influenced by This. It will be objected , That there were as great Saints in either of the former Laws as in this Last ; such as E●●●● , Daniel , Moses , Elias , David , &c. I answer That there were great Saints no doubt , now and then , under those former States of the Church : ●●t I deny that that Sanctity was owing to the ●gena Elementa , or Ordinary Efficacy and Doctrine ●● those Laws ; but that they had those Elevated ●egrees and high Strains of Holiness which appears in their Actions and Writings , by Extraordinary Means ; viz. either from the Prophets who were Divinely Inspir'd ; or else from Partiiular Supernatural Providences , ( not unfrequent in those days ) and not meerly from the State of the Mosaical or of the Natural Law. Their Best Dispositions for Heaven was their Faith and Hope in a Messiah to come , which how dim and dark that was , in comparison of what GOD has Reveal'd to the World after his Resurrection and Coming of the H. Ghost , every Divine knows . I grant , indeed , That the Anti-Trinitarians keep up some faint show of Devotion , by pretending a Creature was sent to Teach the World , and Die , Suffer , &c. But , I say withall , that the Force and Energy of all these Motives and Means , depending on , and going parallel to the Dignity of the Person , especially his Dying for our Sins ; it does consequently fall short of the Efficacy it might have , as far as does the Majesty and Worthiness of an Infinite GOD and Creatour , to the Vileness and Worthlesness ( in comparison ) of a Finite Creature . 9. Those Unstable Doubters may be advertis'd , that tho' they be not able to weigh the force of the Arguments which both sides produce , yet GOD's Goodness has not left them destitute of Means , suitable to their pitch , to preserve them from being deluded , if they will but use them ; which is , to consider the Authority which the Writers of one Party and the other ought to have in the●● Esteem . Now , there are two Particulars to 〈◊〉 consider'd in Learned Authors , viz. their N●●ber and their Weight . As for the First of these their Number , the Anti-Trinitarians must confess that taking the Whole Extent of the Church , and this thro' so many Centuries , there have been Innumerable multitudes of Bishops and Priests , famous for their Knowledge and Sanctity ; and , considering the Number of Christian Universities , Ten thousand Doctors of Divinity , and Men Eminent for Learning , for One of theirs ; Who , for their Morals , were many of them reputed Saints , and none of them held Impious or Careless of their Salvation . All this Incredible Multitude of Knowing and Virtuous Persons , have held , Ador'd and Glorify'd the H. Trinity of Persons in the Unity of the GODHEAD ; and lookt-upon it as a most Fundamental Article of all Christian Faith. So that in Number the Anti-Trinitarians cannot pretend their Learned Men bear any Proportion to ours . As for the Weight of their Authority , it depends on their Knowledge and their Honesty . Allowing then both Parties to be Equal as to their Honesty and Sincerity , and considering only their Knowledge : Tho' those Unlearned Persons I speak to at present , ( they not being Professors of Knowledge themselves , ) cannot be qualify'd to judge directly , which Party is more Knowing ; yet they are Capable of so much Sense as to reflect , that if the Learned Men who deny a Trinity be comparatively so very Few in Number , they must be Superabundant in Weight , that is , exceedingly more knowing than the Christian Party was : For , otherwise , the Vast over-proportion in Number , must , in such men's Esteem , necessa●●ly sink the Ballance to the Christian's side : Na●●re having given them so much Sense as to see ●vidently , that where the Quality is Equal in both , the Quantity must clearly carry the Advantage ▪ Now , what one Man of those very Few ( comparatively ) which they can pretend to , can they name , who has been such a Monster of Learning in comparison of this Innumerable multitude of Christian Bishops , Fathers , and Profest Doctors , that they are all to be held Dunces in comparison of Him ? What are the Productions , where are the Books that Prodigious Man has Writ , which have rais'd him to that Transcendent Reputation in the World , that all our Doctors , who have been by Indifferent men ( to say no more ) held to be Men very Eminent for their Learning , ought , all of them to be accounted Block beads , if compar'd with his Peerless Parts ? None such was ever heard of ; and I believe themselves will not think it for the Interest of their Credit to name any such . Wherefore , it is obvious for any man of Ordinary Prudence to discern that the Weight of the Authority of their Learned Men is far from being considerable ; and thence conclude , that the Vast Number of our Learned Bishops , Professors , and Doctors , ought , in their Esteem , to outweigh , beyond any comparison , the Adverse Party . 10. If they have , or ever had , any such Paragon of Learning to produce , let them approve him to be such by bringing some one Demonstration of his against our Doctrine of the B. Trinity . One Single Demonstration , as I told them above , deduc't from Undeniable Principles , stood to , and maintain'd by Reducing it to Evident Grounds , would do the whole Business , and save much Pro●fusion of Ink-shed . But , alas ! they are , an● have been so far from bringing any , that I could never discern they ever aym'd at it , or so much as knew what a Demonstration meant . Their utmost Ambition is to give their sleight Discourses a Glossy Outward Appearance , ( for Superficial Talk best takes with weak People ) and if they can but make it look Probable by alluding Texts , or Sprucing it up with a little smooth Rhetorick , and such Baubles as Nonsense needs to adorn and recommend it , they think their work is done , and they have perform'd Wonders . 11. This leads us to their pretence , That Scripture is clearly for them ; that is , that they brag they hit on the right Sense of it better than the Christian Party ; And , it must be allow'd , that they have a peculiar Dexterity in giving a Plausible Turn to the Plainest Texts , by study'd Allusions of one Place to another ; which , especially , if it be New , and not observ'd formerly , is able to delude the Ignorant . But an easie Antidote will secure any Man of an Ordinary size of Wit from being infected with this quaint Stratagem . It were easie to show that he must be a Man of Universal Learning who is qualify'd to be a consummate Interpreter of the several places of Scripture , as they profess themselves to be . He must be well verst in the Oriental Languages , an Excellent Critick , a great Chronologist , well acquainted with the Sense of Antiquity , and even of their Customs , their Proverbs , Phrases or Manners of speaking ; He must be a good Logician to observe the Tenour or Connexion of the Context , and thence able to discern whether the Alluded places ●… taken in the same precise Sense ; without which ●he Allusion of them to one another is ridiculous , ●mproper and insignificant . He must be a good Natural Philosopher and Metaphysician , otherwise those Passages which speak of Spiritual Natures , ●f understood Literally , will lead them into most Dangerous Mistakes . Lastly , He must be a good Speculative Divine , to consider the Drift and Nature of Reveal'd Faith , and the End why it was told us ; and thence the Proportion those Means have to compass that End ; a Point particularly Useful for Pastors who are to guide Souls in the Paths that lead to Heaven , and breed them up so as to attain Eternal Happiness , &c. Now , it is manifest , that those Vulgar Understandings , to whom we address this Discourse , are not capable of any of these ; nor , consequently , can they determine who has these Qualifications , or follows these Rules exactly : Yet , there is none of them so Ignorant , but he knows very certainly , that No Man can compass an End without the Means to it : nor , can be able to compass it better without having Better Means . Let then the Right Interpretation of Scripture be the End aym'd at ; The Means to perform this , or atchieve this End , must either be Supernatural or Natural ; and unless they can show their Advantage in one of these Means , they cannot pretend to persuade any man of Common Sense to believe them . To the former of these Means they do not pretend ; and , if they did , they must show some Supernatural outward Sign to justifie their Claim : For , otherwise , since no man can see what passes within their Souls , none can have any reason to believe they have any such . If they say , they have Better Natural Means , it will lie upon them to pro●… it ; and how will they evince it , or make it 〈…〉 that they are so singularly furnisht with tho●● Natural or Human Means as to out strip so clearly and surpass the Innumerable Multitudes of Christian Doctors and Professors in many Learn●● Universities , and for so many Ages . Our Men have been Professors of the Sacred Languages , they have spent many years in Perusing the Fathers and Ancient Commentators , they are most Exact Criticks , nay , so far as to have writ divers Volumes on that Subject . They have been held Eminent in Logick , and in all sorts of Philosophy and Divinity , &c. and the same may be said of whatever other Humane Skill , Art or Science , the Others can pretend to . How then will the Anti-Trinitarians make it appear , that they have better Natural Means of Interpreting Scripture than the Christian Church and her Members have had , and still have ? And , if they cannot make out they have better Means for interpreting Scripture , What man will be so sottish as to believe them they better Interpret it , meerly because they say they do ? For 't is here supposed , those unlearned Persons are not qualify'd to judge of the Allegations on both sides , which are made pro and con . 12. Lest it should be pretended , as some Deists do , That the Apostles out of over-respect to their Master would needs make him a GOD ; and , to make that Tenet current Sense , invented a Trinity of Persons , of which each should be GOD ; or , ( as the Arians and Socinians say ) that the Christian Church introduced it sinee ; To beat down this Calumny , those Unlearned and Credulous Men may ask them , how this could be , since both many Learned Jews , and even some Wiser Heathens acknowledg'd a Trinity in GOD : As to ●he Jews , it is shown at large from their own Authors , in that Excellent Treatise , Entituled , A Short and Easie Method with the DEISTS , with a Second Part to the IEWS , from Pag. 209. to 224. And as for the Heathens , I hapt to reside some time at Amsterdam in the year 1678. where I converst very frequently with Christophorus Sandii Sandius , the famous Modern Writer for the Arians . Of whom , by the way , to give the Reader some account . He was a Man of a quick Conceit , and nimble Wit ; his Talent lay in catching at little Expressions , snatcht out of Authors here and here , and improving them dexterously to his Advantage ; but otherwise he seem'd quite destitute of Logick , or any other Philosophical Science . Hence , he was a very Weak Reasoner , a Rash Concluder , and incapable of Arguing from any Principles , which he quite disregarded and sleighted . What concerns my purpose is , that he show'd me divers Citations which he had pickt up out of Heathen Authors , in which they own'd a Trinity ; and would needs pretend that the Christian Church had borrow'd ( forsooth ) that Tenet , among other Superstitions , from the Heathens . I told him , that this made against himself , and rather argu●d that all Mankind , who reflected deeply upon the Essence of a Spiritual Nature , especially if they held it to be Infinite , had some rude Sentiments of a Trinity ; or perhaps , that some few Iews might have it from some Persons that were Englighten'd after a special manner , and that the Heathens had it ●●om Them. I wish my Recommendation might prevail with some Learned Man of our Universities , where they have plentiful Libraries , to confute that Book of his ; in compiling which , I could discern by his Discourse , he had been assisted by his whole Party , inspecting Libraries in divers Countries , and picking out what they could find to their Advantage . I believe they will find it wants no Insincerity ; a judicious Friend of mine , whom I intreated to peruse it , having ( as he told me ) discover'd much foul Play in divers Places . 13. The same Unlearned Readers may also be admonisht that they ought not to read , or at least heed such Books ; lest wading too rashly out of their Depth , they come to Sink . For , since such Books pretend to show , that the Tenet of the Trinity is full of Contradictions , and such Readers are not skill'd , nor are able to know , how many Requisites do go to a Contradiction ; it is manifest they wrong their Reason by over-weening , or taking upon them to judge of a Point of which they are Ignorant what the very Terms mean. 14. Yet , if they have good Mother-Wits , they may be made to a great degree capable of Discerning the Folly and False Reasoning of such sleight Discoursers . It will not be hard to make such Men see there can be no Contradiction unless we Affirm and Deny in the same Respect . V. g. That there is no Contradiction to say , that a Table is Three according to the Notion or Respect of such a Figure call'd a Corner , or Three-corner'd ; and yet is but One according to that Respect , call'd a Table , or but One Table : Or , that a Man who is a Father , a Son , and a Husband may be Three according to that Respect or Notion call'd Relation , or have Three Relations in him , and yet , be but One , according to the Notion of Thing , or but One Man. Which done , let but the several Notions or Respects that belong to this Mystery be Distinguish'd ; ( by Confounding which those Men do pretend to show it Contradictious ; ) and a little Instruction will let them see plainly , that , at least many of their Objections , if not all , are merely Frivolous and Insignificant . 15. To make this sink better into their Apprehension , it were not amiss to Instance in some one Paragraph of the aforesaid Letter , concerning the Trinity and Athanasian Creed . Wee 'll take one of the shortest , but withall the Pithiest and Shrewdest in their way of Arguing . 'T is found , p. 7. Col. 2. in these Words , [ If the Father is an Infinite All-perfect Being ; and , if the Son is Distinct from the Father ; he must , if he be a GOD , be a Distinct Infinite All-perfect Being ; for the same Being can be no way Distinct from its self : And , certainly , two Distinct All-perfect Beings are two Distinct GODS . ] How currently and smoothly this glides over the Fancy : Yet , when examin'd , and brought to the Test , it will appear by and by , that 't is so incomparably Weak and Silly , that 't is scarce possible to croud more Nonsence into so narrow a Room . Which I show thus . 16. 'T is acknowledg'd , the Father is an Infinite All-perfect Being ; for he has the Divine Nature in Him , which is Infinitely Perfect , or truly GOD. He Proceeds . [ and if the Son is Distinct from the Father . ] In what Sense , I beseech him , or according to what Notion or Respect do we hold He is Distinct ? In that of Being ? Not one Man in GOD's Church ever said it . What we hold and maintain is , that He is only Distinct from Him according to that Notion or Respect calld , Relation ▪ And what Man so stupid as not to see that what differs only in Relation , may be the same Many or the same Being still ? A Man is Marry'd , and has never a Child ; and then he is a [ Man ] but is [ not a Father ] Afterwards , he has a Son , and then he is a Father ; and yet he is the same Man , or the same Being he was : though , to be a Father , and not to be a Father , abstractedly conceiv'd , be Contradictories . It follows , [ and therefore , he must if he be a GOD , be a Distinct All perfect Being . ] And why must this follow , when the Distinction affects the GODHEAD , only according to that Respect called Relation ; and not according to that Respect called Essence , or according to the GODHEAD it self , or the Divine Nature . 'T is strange that these Men cannot Reflect that , when we say , [ God knows Himself ] , or , which is the same , [ GOD ●i known by Himself ] what 's mean't by Knower , and Known , do formally signifie the Relation ; and the word [ GOD , ] and which is the same , [ Himself ] do signifie the GODHEAD , or the same Infinite All-perfect Being in Both. But the Reason he gives for this Consequence , exprest in the words , [ For the same Being can be no ways Distinct from it self ] is such a most Profound piece of Ignorance , that 't is Unparallell'd . Indeed , a being can be no ways Distinct from it self , under the Notion of Being ; for this were to be the same Being , and not to be the same Being ; but that it can be no ways ( as he says ) Distinct from it self , but it must have a Different Being , is against our Common Notions , the Common Language , and the Common Sense of all Mankind . A Child is the same THING , or the same BEING , when it is grown up to be a Man ; wherefore this same Being which is now a Perfect , or ●ipe Man , is now Distinct from its self , according to its Quantity , which is One Way of being Distinct from its former self . The same Man was yesterday in Health , and now is Sick ; and therefore he is Distinct , or Different from himself according to those Qualities ; which is Another Way . He was before no Father , and now is a Father ; therefore he is Distnct from his former self , according to the Notion or Respect of RELATION , which is a Third Way ; and yet , all this while , he is the self-same in respect of his Be●ng . Innumerable are the particular Ways , Endless are the Instances that might be given , how the same Thing , or Being , might differ from its self in some other Respect than that of Being , and therefore must still remain the same Being . Wherefore this Universal Thesis that [ The same Being can no ways be Distinct from its self ] is confutable by the dullest Sophister who ever heard of , and understood the Ten Predicaments , which are the common Heads that contain all the several Notions . Respects , or Considerations which we may make of the same Thing , or the same Being . But these Gentlemen Discourse as if there were but One Predicament , viz. that of Substance , or Being , and they have either Cashier'd or else had , for hast , quite forgot the other Nine . And is such a shallow Pamphlet , a fit Present for the Learned Divines of the Universities ! 17. Let us put a Parallel to this Discourse . Imagine then Peter were both a Father and a Son , in respect of his Different Correlates ; these Gentlemen will undertake to prove plainly , that he must therefore be Two Men thus . [ If this Father be a Rational Creature , and the Notion of Son be Distinct from that of Father ; then Peter , if he be a Man , must be a Distinct Rational Creature , for the same Being can be no ways Distinct from it self , and certainly two Distinct Rational Creatures are Two Men. ] The Parallel is his own Discourse put in the very Tenour he laid it . Only we put the [ Notion ] or Respect of Son to be Distinct from that of Father , because we speak of them ( as we ought ) precisely and formally according to such or such respects ; and not materially ; for , so consider'd , they are all Identify'd with the DEITY ; whence , St. Austin in his Books De Trinitate , when he names Deus , adds immediately id est , Trinitas ; and these men know well that 't is our constant Profession , that the Trinity is no otherwise to be Worshipt than in the Unity of the Godhead . 18. Thus these Gentlemen by their New No-Logick , have prov'd Peter to be two Men , and to have two Individual Natures in him , because he has two different Relations ; which kind of Respect call'd Relations , since ( if we take the whole Extent of that Notion and all the Particulars under it ) we acquire and lose a hundred times a day in one kind or other , no one Being in Nature would be constantly the same , but must be perpetually multiply'd into the Lord knows how many Beings or Things . 19. But the main Point is , That our Question is not whether the same thing can be any way Distinct from it's self ; ●ut , whether the Same Thing may not , and does not , Ground and Verify many Conceptions or Respects of divers kinds ; as is shown in my First Preliminary ; and , whether it does hence follow , that if we affirm that it is One according to One of those Respects , and yet Three according to Another of those Respects , there can be , in that case , any show of a Contradiction , which is the Affirming and Denying of it according to the Same Respect . This , is the true Point , which these Objectors never touch nor heed ; but , instead of Distinguishing those several Respects , they jumble them all together confusedly ; and then , when they have thus shuffled away the true Question , they pretend to Decide that which they have not Toucht , ( perhaps never Thought of it , ) by an Untoward and Aukwa●d way of Arguing by Ifs ; of which we have here no less than Three in Four Lines . 20. My last Advice to those Dissatisfy'd Gentlemen , is , Than they would be so True to their own Reason , as not to fancy themselves competent Iudges of what they cannot but know they are not able to decide ; no● undertake to sound Depths which are beyond the Length of their short Line ; nor be inveigled to apprehend that those most sublime Points that concern what passes within the DEITY it self , must ( when it comes to be Debated or Explicated ) be as plain and familiar to every Ordinary Understanding as a piece of a Romance . 'T is the greatest Policy of those Men , in gaining Proselytes , to spread about their Pamphlets among the Vulgar , and to persuade them that what 's True must needs be Easie , ( as to which Flam every Man who has study'd the Mathematicks is able to undeceive them ) and so make them Iudges of the Controversie ; which is very gratifying to Original Sin , and to our Innate Pride , the Effect of it . And , if once they can bring them to swallow this bait , and embrace this Erroneous Principle of over-weening , they are sure they are caught . For , then , they have no more to do but to propose to them some pretty superficial Tri●●es , which if examin'd by True Principles , have not a grain of Sense in them ; and yet , being suteable to the pitch of weak Understandings , are very Plausible and Taking , and they presently hold themselves well appay'd . By this means also they are brought to undervalue and contemn all Learned Discourses which go the bottom of the subject in hand ; because they are not at the first sight so easily intelligible to their Low Capacities . Thus I have endeavour'd both to satisfie Learned Readers , how this most Holy and Fundamental Article of Christian Faith is Explicable , according to True Principles of Reason working upon our Natural Notions ; and also to Establish the Unlearned from the Delusions of those , who , while they oppose it , renounce Faith and Reason both . Which done , I have no more to do but to recommend them to GOD the FATHER who Created , and Preserves us ; to GOD the SON who Redeem'd and Enlightens us ; and to GOD the HOLY SPIRIT who Sanctifies and Comforts us . To all whom , as being One GOD , Blessed for Evermore , be ascrib'd all Honour and Glory . FINIS . ERRATA . EP. Ded. P. 6. L. 2. these does , p. 10. l. 5. only True , Pref. p. 2. l. 27. if she , p. 24. l. 11. by their , p , 26. l. 21. Judiciousness . Book , P. 8. l. 24. Alter'd , p. 57. l. 4. Bodies , l. 24. dele at , p. 75. l. 21. Form or Act , p. 81. l. 8. in the Margin , thence , p. 90. l. 32. is it , p. 96. l. 20. eum , p. 112. l. 33. can exist , p. 116. l. 2. Individuums , p. 123. l. 30. in the Margin , such a Nature , p. 218. l , 15. being there , p. 131. l. 22. tuo scribuntur , p. 140. l. 23. is in a manner , p. 204. l. 20. in the Margin , Chap. 7. p. 257. l. 23. it in , p. 310. l. 16. Encyclopaedia , p. 318. l. 29. similes ei , p. 323. l. 29. refunded into , p. 331. l. 1. could be , p. 347. l. 5. that Chance , p. 405. l. 5. particular Supposita , p. 407. l. 5 , 6. depute , p. 427. l. 21. as does . Notes, typically marginal, from the original text Notes for div A59250-e25330 POWER and ACT are Natural or Common Notions . That there are Three sorts of each . That the First sort of Power belongs to all Things but the First Being . And is Essential to them . Hence the Definition of Created Ens is , That which is capable of Being . That this Power consists in ▪ it's Possibility , or Non-Repugnance to Being . What Metaphysieal UNITY is . The Essences of Things are , Antecedently to their Existence , in the Divine Intellect . Hence the Cartesian Doctrine leaves no Ens in the world . How the Essences of Things are in the Divine Understanding . And how they are said to be Eternal . In what consists Metaphysical VERITY . Hence the First Formal Truths a●e Identical Propositions . Of which there are only Two sorts . Why some Propositions are said to be aeternae veritatis . The Second sort of Power respects not the Notion of Existence , but the Notion of Thing . In what Sence Bodies are said to be Compounded of this Power , and its Act. This Second Power , Matter , is the sole Ground of all Mutability . Hence Pure Acts are Immutable . The Third sort of Power respects Accidental Acts. Which , tho' not properly Things , have yet Analogical Essences . What Metaphysical Divisibility and Composition are . Which clears Objections against the B. Trinity , and against the Mystery of the Incarnation also . The Difference between Logical and Metaphysical Abstraction . That Excellent and Useful Maxim , That [ There are no Actual Parts in any Compound whatever ] Defended and Explicated . The Ground and Reason of that Maxim , [ Actiones & Passiones sunt Suppositorum . ] Hence the Cartesians destroy the Notions of Unum and Ens ▪ The Proper Metaphysical Partt of Body , are Matter and Form. The Possibility or Essence of a Body consists in the Agreeableness of its Matter and Form. That there is no Real or Actual Distinction in ●n any Ens whatsoever . How many sorts of Entities are Possible to be Created . Existence is the Ultimate Act of Ens. Wherefore Existence is rather to be call'd Actuality , than Act. That there is a GOD. The Method , how GOD's Providence gave us our Elements of Knowledge . And ripen'd our Knowledge afterwards . What Encouragement our present Acquests have given us . What assured Hopes we have of Success in our Quest of Science , if we ground our Discourse on the Natures of the Things made by the First Being . All Concrete Notious include some Form that constitutes them such . The Form of Ens is Essence . The Essences of Pure Acts consists in Actual Knowledge . Yet they are Potential to the Act of Existence . The Essence of Body is c●●●●ly taken from its Form. Yet not only , but from the Matter also . Quantitative and Not-Quantitative , are not the Proper Differences that constitute Body and Spirit . The Essence of the FIRST MATTER of the Cartesians cannot consist in only Extension . Nor in Extension and Impenetrability together . Every Body is essentially a Distinct Part of Nature . Wherefore 't is ordain'd for some Proper and Primary Operation in Nature . Wherefore , whatever fits ▪ it for this Primary Operation , constitutes it . * See B. 4. Med. last . In this Fitness to perform its Primary Operation consists it's Metaphysical GOODNESS . Every Body is essentially an Instrument . The Essential Difference of Body is chiefly taken from it's Action . The Modes or Accidents that make Bodies thus Fit , are it 's Essential Form. But the Thing must retain that Complexion of Accidents for some time . Divisibility in Common cannot constitute any Body . More and Less of Divisibility , may . One or Two different Accidents may constitute the Simplest Bodies . Wherefore the Elements are constituted by Density and Rarity . * See B. 4. §. 6. The Elements were thus constituted at first ; tho' perhaps there are not any such now . * See B. 4. §. 8. Hence the Cartesian , First Matter , which they put neither to be Rare nor Dense , is a Chimera . What we have gain'd by our Speculation hitherto . The Reason why we Discourse of Abstract Notions ; and of the vast Advantage it yields . It can scarce be imagin'd that there are now any Pure Elements , farther prov'd . How First-Mixt Bodies may be conceiv'd to be made . The Essential Form of First-Mixt Bodies . And their Essences . The Second sort of Mixt Bodies . The Third sort of Mixts . The Fourth sort of Mixts . What other Accidents are superadded to make variety of Mixts and Demixts . Yet Rarity and Density are the Principal and most Intrinsecal . Hence the Corpuscularians can give no account of the Intrinsecal Constitution of any Natural Body . Of the several sorts of Demixts . The Ground of Sensible Qualities . Of Imperfect Mixts . Of Living Bodies . Of Vegetables . The Primary Operation of Vegetables . The Form of Vegetables . The Essences of Animals . Their Primary Operation . What Animal is most Perfect in it's Kind . What has been prov'd hitherto , recapitulated . The Excellency of Metaphysicks ; and the Sublime way of discoursing , peculiar to it . What sleight ways of Discoursing some others affect . What is our Duty , as we are Rational Creatures . MAN is One Thing made up of Soul and Body . Therefore the Soul and Body are , here , only Potential Parts . Therefore Neither Part can Operate Alone . Which Ground● that Excellent Maxim , [ Actiones & Passiones sunt Suppositorum ] Hence the Christian Tenet of the Incarnation , is Agreeable to Right Reason . Of the Form or Act of Man , as he is Man. Both ●arts concurr to every Operation of Man , as he is Man. Hence , every Notion has a Phantasm accompanying it . Of the Total Form of Man. What chiefly , in both these Parts , distinguishes Man from all other Things . Hence all Pretence of GOD voluntary Annexing , is Unphilosophical and Groundless . Hence the Mens is not the Man. The Soul's manner of Existing and Operating , here , is , in part , Corporeal . The Primary Operation of Man is Reasoning . The Attainment of Truth is the Perfection of Man's Understanding . The Knowledge of Truth , which thus perf●cts Man , must be Evident . Probability perfects no Man. Nor the improving his Memory or Fancy . The promoting Evident Truth is the Noblest Action of Man. Hence Errour is the greatest Depravation of Man's Nature . The Essence of Man is Rationality . And distinguishes him from Angels and Brutes . Hence [ Animal Rationale ] is his true Definition . In Rationality are included the Powers of Apprehending and Judging . As also the Power of receiving Simple Apprehensions , by Impressions from Objects ▪ transmitted them to the Brain . The Power of Reflecting is also an Essential Property of Man. The Soul acquires Knowledge by Impressions from Objects , on their Senses . First Proof . Second Proof . Third Proof . Fourth Proof . Fifth Proof . Sixth Proof . Seventh Proof . Eighth Proof . That the Soul cannot Elicit Ideas out of her self , from many heads . That the Position , which makes the Soul and Body Two Things , hinders the Right Explication of Christian Faith. This Tenet makes overy Man to be a Monstrous Chimera . That the Pre-existence of Souls is a Senseless Conceit , and Impossible . So is the Pythagorean Transmigration . That 't is a Folly to ask , how the Soul and Body came to be United . The Rational Progress , and Immediate Steps of our Thoughts hitherto . Why it was necessary such a Creature as MAN should be made . By what means GOD's Infinite Wisdom contriv'd the Union of the Soul and Body in one Thing . The Condition of our Soul here , laid open . How the Coalition of the Soul and Body into one Ens , agrees with Principles of Reason . What Errors and Absurditics have sprung out of the contrary Opinion . That only Individuals are properly THINGS . And , therefore only Individual Essences are properly ESSENCES . Yet we can discourse more clearly of the Common Essences than we can of the Individual ones . There go more Accidents to constitute the Individuum , than there goes to constitute the Common Essences . Thts Complexion of Accidents is the most Perfect Act next ▪ c● that of Existence . Hence 't is demonstrated , that to give Existence is above the Power of Natural Causes , and Peculiar to GOD. There must be some Instant in which the Individual first begins to be . This Complexion of Accidents is Essential to the New Individuum . Therefore it is the Essential or Substantial FORM of the Individual Compound . Those Accidents that accrue afterwards are Accidentals , To be an Individuum , some degree of Constancy , Permanency or Stability is requir'd . Which Existence , supervening , does establish . The twisting the results of so many various Causes into one Individuum , argues the Design of an All-comprehending ▪ Providence . This Complexion of Accidents can never be eradicated , while the Individuum continues . And gives the Compound a Different Genius and Natural Propension . Existence can with no shew of Reason be pretended to be the Principle of Individuation . The Distinction between the Notions of a Subsistent Thing , or a Suppositum , and the Notion of an Individual Ens , clearly manifested . How and when the Individuality is ●… . The First Rule how to know this . The Second Rule . The Third Rule . Hence every Simple Division of the Matter in Living Things , changes not the Individuation . Much less in Man. When the Individuation is lost in Simple Bodies . When in First-Mixt Bodies . When in Demixts . When in Homogeneous Bodies . When , in very Heterogeneous or Organical Bodies . Two contradistinct Natures may Compound One Thing . And the Human Na ture may subsist in the Divine Suppositum . Yet those Natures and their Properties will remain Unmingled ; and not Confounded , as some Eutychians imagin'd . Yet , all the Actions and Passions must be attributed to the Suppositum , tho' according to such in Nature ; contrary to what Nestorius fancy'd . Hence , lastly , there is no shew of Contradiction that GOD should be Three according the Notion of [ Person ] , and yet but One , according to the Respect of his Essence or Nature . A large Explication of some Grounds , very Useful to take o●f all Shadow of Contradiction from divers Chief Mysteries of Christian Faith ; and to show how Consonant they are to the most Exact Rules of Right Reason . How impossible it is to know perfectly all that belongs to our Individuality . By what wonderful and Untraceable Ways GOD's Providence has brought about our Individuation . And has given us all our knowledge , and other Endowments . How little our best Performance contributed to the Acquisition of them . And how little the most Knowing or Best Man has to be Proud of the most Estimable Actions GOD has done by him . That we ought to comply with the Designs of our Great Cretour ; and , by what means this may be best accomplisht . 1. Preliminary We cannot but have different Conceptions of the Parts of Man. And , consequently of every Operation of his , as he is Man. That we must examin , whether there be anything in Man , according to his Soul , which is above Quantity or Matter . That there are Three Distinct Operations of Man as he is Intellective . The Notion of [ Ens ] or [ Thing ] is Indifferent to Actual Being , or Not-Being . Every Form that is in any Subject , must denominate it to be formally such as it self is . A Notion may either be consider'd Subjectively , or Objectively . Every Object of our Knowledge must either be the Thing it self , ās in the Mind , or something that is like it . That Notions , undrrstood Objectively , are the Things themselves , as in the Mind ; and not meer Similitudes of them ; Prov'd unanswerably . Prov'd Unanswerably by the Concession of the Ideists themselves , that the Thing it self must be in th● Mind . In what Sense , [ Every [ Like ] is not the Same , ] is verify'd . Hence , every Inadequate Notion we have of the Thing , is of the Whole Thing Confusedly and Materially ; tho' it be only of one Metaphysical Part , or Considerability of it , Distinctly and Formally . A Third Unanswerable Proof , that the Thing it self must be in our Mind when we know it . The Author's Reason why he builds upon this Thesis , that the Thing it self is in the Soul when she knows it . The Reasons why some others are backward to Assent to it . Notwithstanding , the Immortality of the Soul may be Evinced , tho● This Thesis were wav'd . §. 1. Demonstration Dem. I. Because her Operations and Objects are receiv'd in her after an Indivisible manner . * See Solid Philosophy Asserted , Reflexion 9. S. 7. Dem. II. Because th● Capacity of the Soul is Infinite . Demon. III. Because she has Other Natures in her , without Altering her own . Demon. IV. From her having Things and Modes in her as others ; or as not belonging to her own Nature . Demon. V. Because the Contrary Thesis is opposite to the Natural Notions of all Mankind . Existence is the Absolute Notion ; and all the rest ●re Respective . Dem. VI. Because she has the No tion of [ Existence ] in her , which is every way Indivisible . That the Soul has Actual Respects in her . This Demonstration enforced . Dem. VIII . Because she has the Notions or Natures of Vast Quantities in her ; which 't is impossible they should be there Themselves , as they are in Matter ; or any Material Resemblances of them . Dem. IX . Because the Parts of Motion are perfectly Distinct and Determinate in the Soul , which are utterly Undistinguisht as they are in Material Nature . Dem. X. Because the Soul has in her Past and Future Parts of Time Present at once . Dem. XI . Because the Soul can tye together as many Singulars as she pleases , in the Notion of One Number ; of which the Fancy has no Material Resemblance . Dem. XII . Because Sensible Qualities , tho' Innumerable , and contrary to one another , are in the Soul without Disordering her in the least . Dem. XIII . Because those Sensible Qualities do not fight and expel one another ; as they must , were their Subject made of Matter . Dem XIV . Because Innumerable multitudes of Various and Large Figures are in the Soul at once . Demon. XV. Because the Soul has in her Universal Notions . Dem. XVI . B●the Thing is in and by the Soul Divided in-into such Parts , as Material Division cannot reach Demon. XVII . Because the Composition the Soul makes afterwards of these thus-Divided Parts is impossible to be perform'd by a Material Agent . Hence is seen the Reason why Angels do not thus Compound and Divide . Demon. XVIII . Because what is meant by the Copula [ it , ] which is us'd in all our Affirmative Judgments , cannot possibly be so much as Shadow'd or Represented by any Material Similitude . De●●● . XIX . Because the Connexion of the ●●●clusion with Right Premisses is ●●●e the Force of all Nature or ●atter , and Im●●●●le to b● Solv'd ●● Broken. Demon. XX. Because all the Notions the Soul has , are Concise and Exact , even to an Indivisible . Demon. XXI . Because the Soul is a Pure Act , and therefore Immaterial . Demon. XXII . Because the Soul gives a kind of Being to Non-Entities and Chimeraes , which can have no Existence in Nature . How some do mistake the Nature of the Indivisibility attributed to the Soul. The Proper and True Sense in which a Spirit is said to be Indivisible . That 't is consonant to the Nature of the Subject that the Soul should contain Corporeal Nature , and it 's Modes , Indivisibly . In what Sense we are to take the word [ Instantaneous , ] when we say the Operations of Pure Spirits are such . Last Demonstration , Concluding the Whole Point ; That our Soul , it being so manifestly and manifoldly Demonst●a●ed to be Immaterial , is necessarily IMMORTAL . That the Nature of our Spiritual part , the Soul , can only be known by Reflexion ; and , therefore , in discoursing of It we must T●ansc●nd our Senses , and Corporeal Phantasms . The Unreasonableness of Atheists . What Obligations are incumbent on us , who know and acknowledge our Soul to be Immortal . Our former Demonstrations for the Immortality of our Soul , summ'd up , and Recapitulated . The most Important Use we ought to make ▪ of this Doctrin , That our Soul is Immortal . Notes for div A59250-e93120 The Soul , at her Separation , receives some Change , according to her Manner of Existing , and Suppositality . The Manner how this is done Illustrated . Yet the same Individual Nature remains in her . All the Modes or Accidenti , v. g. all the Knowledges and Affections , she had while here , do ▪ remain still in her . Each Soul , when Separated , knows all Created Truths . * B. 1. Ch. 5. §. 2. How this is very Possible . Hence every Separated Soul comprehends All Time and Place . Hence her Operations are not measur'd by Time ; They and their Subject being of a Superiour Nature . Hence she will be Eternally Miserable , unless she knows the First Cause , GOD. Hence also , she is naturally Unchangeable . Hence too , as soon as Separated , she knows all the Thoughts and Affections , Words and Actions of her past Life . Whence follows the Particular Judgment , which determines her Lot at the Hour of Death . Hence is understood how the Book of Conscience will be laid open at the last Day . And how Infants are connaturally sav'd by Baptism . Hence Ana-Baptism is Impious and Unnatural . The foregoing Principles show how much more easie it is for the Saints and Angels in Heaven , to know our Actions and Necessities . The Practical Iudgments , or Affections , to carry the Soul to the Attainment of the Good she most Lov'd here , in case it be Attainable in the Future State. The Best Intellectual Good , or the Sight of GOD is Attainable in the N●xt Life , if the Soul be Dispos'd for it . Therefore to work up our Christian Principles to such Good Dispositions , ought to be the whole Employ of our Life here . This good Disposition is Charity , or the Love of GOD above all things . H●nce all the Means and Motives lay'd by our B : Saviour , ●●nd only to breed and promote in us this Predominant A●f●●ction for Heaven . The Definition of True Religion . From the same Principle is Demonstrated , that , To depart ●h●nce with a Contrary Disposition , or a First Affection for any Creature , will torment the Soul , with most Unspeable Grief and Anguish . The State of Separation Elevates the Soul to an Incomparably higher Perfection of Existence , ( she being then a Pure Act ) than she had here . Wherefore , it does , consequently Elevate the Activity of all her Powers ; and particularly the Acts of her Will , her Affections , to an Unconceiveable Intenseness and Vehemency , above what she had while in the Body . Hence , the Poena Damni for the Loss of the Sight of GOD , and the Poena Sensus , for the Loss of the Temporal False . Good she here d●ted on , in a wicked Soul , are Unspeakable , and plunge her in a HELL of Misery . Their sad Condition describ'd . GOD Damns no Man. The Knowing all Truths Speculatively in the State of Separation , does not alter the Predominant Affection for Creatures . As the Tree falls so it lies . Hence , one Enormous Actual Sin , Unrepented , renders a Soul liable to Eternal Damnation . That the State of Separation does not alter the First Affection of Souls , farther demonstrated . Hence Sin does not formally consist in the Falsity of the Practical Iudgment or Affection ; but , in the Disproportion and Inordinateness of it : From the former Principles it follows that all those several Kinds of Knowledges we had here , will be Elevated to an Unmeasurable Excess in the State of Separation . Hence also , all the Virtuous Affections , which good Souls had here for Friends , Relations and Acquaintances will remain in the Next Life ; and make them ardently wish and pray for their Salvation . That each Particular Deduced here , is Demonstrable by the Principles laid formerly : Shown , by repeating those Principles . Wherefore , there is not the least Th●ught , Word or Action , Good or Bad , which we ever had or did , in this Life , but will have it ▪ ● Corsequent and Proper Effect , Adjusted and Proportion'd to it , in the Next . The Admirable Excellency of a Soul when Separated and become a Pure Spirit , Display'd . That there is no Comparison between our Souls Condition here , and the State of Separation . That meer Humane Science , when at the Height , was too short and Impotent to raise Mankind to those Dispositions that fit him for True Happiness . The Necessity of Divine Revelation farther shown . That the Christian Life , is most Comfortable , and the Unchristian most full of Anxiety . The unexpressible Joy of Holy Souls at their First Entring into Bliss . The Order of the Universe requires that there should be different Kinds of Beings . And much more , that there should be Pure Acts or ANGELS . Especially since the Angelical Nature is Capable of Existence . And that otherwise there could be no Immediate Cause of Motion . As is also Demonstrated from the Nature of all Causality . Every more perfect Ens includes in it the Nature of the less perfect . And therefore Pure Acts contain in them the Nature of Body . Which , since it cannot be done by the manner of Quantity , they must contain them by the way of Knowledge . Therefore the very Essences of Bodies are in a Spiritual Understanding , and not Idea's or Similitudes only . This Doctrine being built on that Logical Maxim , [ All Differences are more and less of the Generical Notion , ] The Consideration of that Thesis is recommended to the Reader . This holds equally in the Soul , which is of a Spiritual Nature . Angels , being Pure Acts , are Immutable . The Distinction of Angels is taken from their being more or less Cognoscitive , after their manner . This is not to be understood of the greater Extent of their Knowledge , but of the Intenseness , or Penetrativeness of it . Hence , as far as Reason carries us , is taken the Distinction of the Three Hierarchies , and Nine Quires of Angels . The different manner by which Angels and Human Souls come to have all their Knowledge . These Angels have a Nobler Essence , whose each Act of Knowledge has for it's Object a Greater Portion of the Universe . Which makes them fit to superintend the Administration of a Larger Province . How Consonant this is to those Passages of the Holy Scripture , which speak of such Operations of Angels . An Angel cannot operate upon another Angel so as to change it . Wherefore , all it 's External Operation , so as to work a Change in another thing , can only be upon Bodies . An Angel can thus operate upon Material Entities , or Bodies . That we only intend to evince here the An Est of the Operation of an Angel , and not the Manner how it is perform'd . Yet no one Angel has an Unlimited Power to operate thus on all Bodies whatevee . An Angel can move or change those Bodies which are within the Sphere of it's Activity , in an imperceptible Time. Hence the Wonderful Effects , recorded in Holy Writ to have been done by Angels , are Consonant to Metaphysical Principles . That the Ordinary Ministring Spirits or the Guardian Angels of particular Persons are the Lowest sort of Angels . But the Greater and Weightier Affairs are transacted by Archangels . ● The Lower Angels receiv'd Intellectual Light from the Superiour in the same Instant they were Created . In what manner the Good Angels perform the Will of their Maker without New Instructions . That GOD makes use of Holy Angels to procure our Good ; and of Bad ones to afflict and punish Mankind , as His Divine Wisdom sees Fitting . By what means Metaphysicks has rais'd our Thoughts above the Sordid Mass of Matter , to contemplate the A●gelical Nature . The surpassing Excellency of their Intellectual Essences decipher'd . How Faith has antecedently enlightned our Reason ; and that 't is our Duty to Explicate and Defend it against the Empty Flourishes of the Drollish Renouncers of Faith and Reason both . What Gratitude , Love and Veneration we owe to those Blessed Ministring Spirits . What Benefit we shall reap by keeping up a Spiritual Communication with them . Yet , to honour them so , as still to remember they are only our Fellow-Servants , tho' highly dignify'd by our Common Master . Notes for div A59250-e113900 That there must be Something which is a most Pure Actuality of Being , Demonstrated . From the acknowledg'd Potentiality of Being , necessarily and manifestly annext , or rather Essential to Creatures . Because what is not , cannot Act. Because Actual Being is the Noblest Effect imaginable . Because no Power can produce an Effect , which is Contradictory to what it is it self , or to its own Nature . The foresaid Demonstration summ'd up , and Enforc'd . This Actuality of Being , gave Being to all other Things . The Objection of the Atheists propos'd , viz : That the World was ever Answer I. That this does not solve our Demonstration . Ans. II. That 't is a meer Voluntary Assertion , never yet prov'd nor Attempted to be Prov'd , nor Possible to be Prov'd . Ans. III. Farther showing that our Argument is not toucht ; and is reducible to an Identical Proposition . Ans. IV. That this Pretence , or Voluntary Assertion is shown to be an absolute Impossibility . Ans. V. That the putting an Infinite Time , which in their Supposition is absolutely Necessary , is a plain Contradiction . Ans. VI. That the very Notion of the word [ Infinite ] apply'd to our Case , is a plain Contradiction . The Position of a Finite Number of Causes , giving Being to one another Circularly , is as ill Nonsense as the former . The Notion of [ Ens ] is Different from that of [ Existent ; ] and , consequently , Essence from Existence . Philosophers must Discourse of the First Being by sueh Natural Notions as they have . The Notion of [ Existence ] is the most Actual of any we hav● . And theref●r● the Fitt●st to 〈…〉 a Pure Actua●●ty of Being ; ●●d glven us by GOD Himself . Every Abstract Word comprehends the whole Nature of the Form or Act it signifies , without any Limitation . Therefore it 's Limitation proceeds either from the Subject , or from the Causes that Determine it . Hence GOD's Essence it self , is absolutely Unlimited , or Actually Infinite ; Therefore GOD is but ONE . Hence Polytheism was a most Senseless Absurdity , and a flat Contradiction . Hence Christian Doctrine is prov'd to be Divine ; the Dawning of which chas'd away that Universal Darkness ; notwithstanding all the Opposition Human Power , Wit , and Learning could make . Existence is the whole Perfection of every thing that Exists . Much more , when it is Essential , and Actually Infinite . Therefore the Divine Existence , or the Deity , includes or concenters all imaginable Perfections in it's Nature . Therefore 〈◊〉 is I●… in ●● Intellctual an● Moral Attributes . Therefore GOD is a Spirit . Therefore , He is not Corporeal . Therefore 't is an Indignity to the Divine Nature to apply such Predicates to it as belong to Body . Hence also He is Immutable . An● a Self-Subsistent Being . For the same Reason the Divine Essence is most Simple or Uncompounded . And his Duration Eternal . And , therefore , not to be Explicated by a Correspondency to our Time. Hence GOD is also Immense . Whence , 't is Derogatory to that Attribute to explicate it by Commensuration to an Infinite Space . Lastly , The Divine Essence , is , of it 's own Nature , Infinitely Intellible ▪ What Comfort this is to Pious , Humble , and weak Souls . That the Author confines himself here to Metaphysical Mediums . Notwithstanding all that 's said , no Notion or Word we have , is Univocally , ( or in the same Sense ) apply'd to GOD and to Creatures . Wherefore all the Words we use , when we speak of GOD , are , in some sort , Metaphorical . Because each of them signifies some one Perfection or Notion ; whereas GOD is the Plenitude of All Being , and All Perfections , center'd in one most Simple Formality . Hence even the Names of our best Virtues , are not , in every regard , properly spoken of GOD. Nor Omnipotent , Creatour , or such like ; all our Language having some tang of Imperfection Annext to it . Nor yet Negative Notions , as Immense , Infine , Immaterial , &c. No Priority or Posteriority , either Real ▪ or made by our Reason , conceiving the least Ground for it in the Thing , can be attributed to GOD. Notwithstanding that all these are with some Impropriety spoken of GOD , yet all of them but the last are Truly said of Him. The Solid Ground of Mystick Theology . Hence is concluded , that all the Notions and Words we have , whether Affirmative or Negative , do full short of the Divine Nature . How by considering the Visible Things of this World , we are come to know the Invisible Things of GOD his Essence , and Attributes . How demonstratively this has been deduced . And this with an Evidence beyond that of the Mathematicks . That this Evident Knowledge of GOD will redound to our Disadvantage if we live not accordingly . That this Knowledge obliges us to the Duties of most profound Adoration and Attention , when we appear before Him in Prayer . To a Firm Belief of what he has Reveal'd . To endeavour to dispose our selves to receive farther Influences of His Grace : and to an unwavering Hope , that he will most certainly give us all we are Capabls of , or Dispos'd for . To tremble at His Iustice , if we wilfully break his Commands . And to Hope of Pardon if we sincerely Repent . To Resignation , in all sinist●r Contingencies , to the Infinitely-Wise Disposition of GOD's Providence in his Government of the World. To Sincerity , and Unpretended Virtue , and Honesty . Especially , to love God , who is our True Good , and Only Happiness , as we ought ; both for what he is in Himself , and what he is to us . The Imitation of GOD's Moral Attributes , are , also , a most Effectual Means to perfect us in all sorts of Virtue . Notes for div A59250-e130000 All Action springs immediately from the Existence of the Cause . And the Acting in such a manner , springs from the Things being of such a Nature or Essence . Therefore the Power of Operation , as 't is such , is refunded into the Essence . Therefore all Causality is the Imparting somewhat to the Patient which was , some way or other , in the Cause or Agent . Hence Motion , only Applies the Agent to the Patient . The First Operation among Bodies is DIVISION . The next Operations are IMPULSE and ATTRACTION . The Reason of which Operations cannot be fetcht from Physical Principles , but from Metaphysicks . 〈…〉 in Metaphy●… from the ●…tter and ●…m . 〈…〉 from the Es●… or Nature of 〈…〉 Common Modifi●…on of Matter , ●…antity . This Disputable Point fully Clear'd . Hence is seen particularly the reason of Attraction . Every Impulse does at first Condense ; and every Attraction , Rarefies . All these Operations are either perform'd by Local Motion , or concomitantly with it . All Motion comes at first from the Angelical Nature . Every part of Motion is a New Effect . Therefore it requires a Continual Influx of the Moving Cause . This Moving Cause is some Chief Angel Rarefying the Matter of the Solar Bodies . Angels are Pre-mov'd or Directed by GOD to move Matter , as i● most sutable to His Eternal Decrees . The First mov'd Bodies do Determine and Continue the Motion of the rest . Hence Angels , and the Bodies they Move , do , as Second Causes , determine the Individuation of all New-made Bodies . But 't is beyond their Power to give Existence . Which therefore is peculiar only to GOD. As also to Conserve things in Being . And to give to a Nobler Essence a Nobler Existence . For the same Reason a Spiritual Form will be given to Matter connaturally Disspos'd for it . The same holds also in Supernatural Gifts , which , are also carried on by Dispositions . Hence GOD is not the Cause of any Defect , much less of Sin , or not-Being . How all these Sorts of Operations do spring from the Respective Essences . That GOD does all that 's Good in All ; and in what Manner , and by what Means . That GOD's Ordinary Providence carries on the Course of Nature by Proper Causes , still producing Proper Effects , Demonstrated , à priori . Con●irm'd , Because , otherwise Mankind could not possibly have any Science ; nor know what to do in their ordinary Actions . The same Great Truth Demonstrated a posteriori . Hence the Course of GOD's Work manship , the Fabrick of Nature , is Close and Indissoluble . The Epicurean Tenet of CHANCE Governing the World is most Absurd and Senseless . What Chance truly is . How groundlessly some Christian Philosophers , the Ideists , do , in part , violate this Best Method of GOD's Ordinary Providence , now Demonstrated . The Folly of the Stoical FATALITY confuted and exploded . The Application of this Doctrine to ou● own Duties .