id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_nl7hlfimebayppvw2brrsd5smy	MARK IAN THOMAS ROBSON	Divine maximal beauty: a reply to Jon Robson	2013	18	.pdf	application/pdf	10069	753	74	possible worlds and the idea that God is perfectly beautiful. My argument tried to In order to make my case against the possible worlds view, I imagined God thoughts are horrendously ugly. In God's mind, then, there are possible worlds stated: perhaps those possible worlds which are ugly can be part of a beautiful, Robson's next argument says that I fail to show that possible worlds are sufficiently analogous to stories. we do not know whether or not possible worlds are ugly (or beautiful), we cannot God contains all possible worlds and is, at the same time, completely beautiful. story) of these states of affairs is rich enough, then it follows that the representation is ugly as well. We have here the typical possible worlds account of as my motivation for claiming that ugly possible worlds ruin the beauty of God: ROBSON, JON () 'Do possible worlds compromise God's beauty? () 'Possible worlds and the beauty of God', Religious Studies, , –.	./cache/work_nl7hlfimebayppvw2brrsd5smy.pdf	./txt/work_nl7hlfimebayppvw2brrsd5smy.txt