id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_oq6uisw5pnblvaum3hgtdbv3cu	Angela Breitenbach	Beauty in Proofs: Kant on Aesthetics in Mathematics	2013	28	.pdf	application/pdf	11387	598	48	demonstrations, but not the properties of mathematical objects, be regarded as beautiful? The purposiveness of mathematical objects, Kant argues, consists in their mathematical objects, as Kant argues, display 'a manifold and often admired [...] purposiveness' Kant characterises the purposiveness thus attributed to mathematical objects as 'an Kant claims further, the properties of mathematical objects are commonly described in purposiveness of mathematical objects, the experience of beauty is not identifiable with any determinate claims about some purposive property in the object, aesthetic judgments express As we have seen, Kant argues that the objective purposiveness of mathematical relative perfection of mathematical objects, Kant concludes, are not identifiable with aesthetic purposive properties of mathematical objects, Kant makes his surprising third claim in which intuitive nature of mathematical demonstrations, we can explain Kant's conception of beauty While aesthetic judgment is nonconceptual, in mathematical constructions the imagination provides a priori representations of aesthetic experience in mathematics on Kant's account.	./cache/work_oq6uisw5pnblvaum3hgtdbv3cu.pdf	./txt/work_oq6uisw5pnblvaum3hgtdbv3cu.txt