Health Implications of Black Lives Matter Among Black Adults | SpringerLink Advertisement Search Log in Search SpringerLink Search Published: 21 April 2020 Health Implications of Black Lives Matter Among Black Adults Eleanor K. Seaton  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-3285-47671, Aggie J. Yellow Horse2, Hyung Chol Yoo2 & Edward Vargas2  Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities volume 7, pages1241–1248(2020)Cite this article 1950 Accesses 2 Citations 33 Altmetric Metrics details A Correction to this article was published on 31 May 2020 This article has been updated Abstract Objective The current study examined whether knowledge, understanding and support of the Black Lives Matter movement were positively linked to self-reported physical health among a representative sample of Black American adults. Methods The 2016 Collaborative Multiracial Post-election Survey (CMPS) examined attitudes about the 2016 US election, immigration, policing, racial equality, and racial discrimination among Asian American, Black American, Latinx, and White adults. The current study used the Black American sample, which included 3102 individuals (69% female) older than 18 years of age. We used a set of logistic regression models to assess the associations of knowledge, support, and understanding of Black Lives Matter with overall physical health. Results Although knowledge of Black Lives Matter was not a significant predictor for physical health, understanding and supporting Black Lives Matter significantly predicted positive physical health among Black American adults. Conclusions Black American adults who understand and support Black Lives Matter reported more positive overall physical health. This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution. Access options Buy single article Instant access to the full article PDF. US$ 39.95 Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout. Subscribe to journal Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually. US$ 79 Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout. Rent this article via DeepDyve. Learn more about Institutional subscriptions Change history 31 May 2020 The names of two coauthors of this article were updated following the article’s original publication. References 1.Garza A, Tometi O, Cullors P. A herstory of the# BlackLivesMatter movement. Are all the women still white. 2014:23–8. 2.Khan-Cullors P. When they call you a terrorist: a black lives matter memoir: Canongate Books; 2018. 3.Movement for Black Lives. 2018. https://policy.m4bl.org/about/. 4.Dixson AD. “What’s going on?”: a critical race theory perspective on black lives matter and activism in education. Urban Educ. 2018;53(2):231–47. Article  Google Scholar  5.Hargons C, Mosley D, Falconer J, Faloughi R, Singh A, Stevens-Watkins D, et al. Black lives matter: a call to action for counseling psychology leaders. Couns Psychol. 2017;45(6):873–901. Article  Google Scholar  6.Royal C, Hill ML. Fight the power: making# BlackLivesMatter in urban education: introduction to the special issue. Urban Educ. 2018;53(2):143–4. Article  Google Scholar  7.García JJ-L, Sharif MZ. Black lives matter: a commentary on racism and public health. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(8):e27–30. Article  Google Scholar  8.Bassett MT. # BlackLivesMatter—a challenge to the medical and public health communities. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(12):1085–7. CAS  Article  Google Scholar  9.Edwards F, Esposito MH, Lee H. Risk of police-involved death by race/ethnicity and place, United States, 2012–2018. Am J Public Health. 2018;108(9):1241–8. Article  Google Scholar  10.Mapping Police Violence. Police Violence Report 2018; 2017. Google Scholar  11.Ince J, Rojas F, Davis CA. The social media response to Black Lives Matter: how Twitter users interact with Black Lives Matter through hashtag use. Ethn Racial Stud. 2017;40(11):1814–30. Article  Google Scholar  12.Horowitz JM, Livingston G. How Americans view the black lives matter movement. Pew Research Center. 2016;8. 13.Neal S. Views of racism as a major problem increase sharply, especially among Democrats. Pew Research Center. 2017. 14.Hope EC, Keels M, Durkee MI. Participation in Black Lives Matter and deferred action for childhood arrivals: modern activism among Black and Latino college students. J Divers High Educ. 2016;9(3):203–15. Article  Google Scholar  15.Pender KN, Hope EC, Riddick KN. Queering Black activism: exploring the relationship between racial identity and Black activist orientation among Black LGBTQ youth. Journal of community psychology. 2019;47(3):529–43. Article  Google Scholar  16.Hope EC, Gugwor R, Riddick KN, Pender KN. Engaged against the machine: institutional and cultural racial discrimination and racial identity as predictors of activism orientation among black youth. Am J Community Psychol. 2019;63(1–2):61–72. Article  Google Scholar  17.Szymanski DM. Racist events and individual coping styles as predictors of African American activism. J Black Psychol. 2012;38(3):342–67. Article  Google Scholar  18.Harrell SP. A multidimensional conceptualization of racism-related stress: implications for the well-being of people of color. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2000;70(1):42–57. CAS  Article  Google Scholar  19.Hope EC, Spencer MB. Civic engagement as an adaptive coping response to conditions of inequality: An application of phenomenological variant of ecological systems theory (PVEST). In: Handbook on positive development of minority children and youth: Springer; 2017. p. 421–35. 20.Zimmerman MA, Ramirez-Valles J, Maton KI. Resilience among urban African American male adolescents: a study of the protective effects of sociopolitical control on their mental health. Am J Community Psychol. 1999;27(6):733–51. CAS  Article  Google Scholar  21.Hope EC, Velez G, Offidani-Bertrand C, Keels M, Durkee MI. Political activism and mental health among Black and Latinx college students. Cult Divers Ethn Minor Psychol. 2018;24(1):26–39. Article  Google Scholar  22.Fine M, Torre ME, Frost DM, Cabana AL. Queer solidarities: new activisms erupting at the intersection of structural precarity and radical misrecognition. J Soc Polit Psychol. 2018;6(2):608–30. Article  Google Scholar  23.Attree P, French B, Milton B, Povall S, Whitehead M, Popay J. The experience of community engagement for individuals: a rapid review of evidence. Health & social care in the community. 2011;19(3):250–60. Article  Google Scholar  24.Chan WY, Ou S-R, Reynolds AJ. Adolescent civic engagement and adult outcomes: an examination among urban racial minorities. Journal of youth and adolescence. 2014;43(11):1829–43. Article  Google Scholar  25.Brown AG, Hudson LB, Chui K, Metayer N, Seguin RA, Folta SC. Improving heart health among Black/African American women using civic engagement: a pilot study. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):112. Article  Google Scholar  26.Barreto M, Frasure-Yokley L, Vargas ED, Wong J. The Collaborative Multiracial Post-Election Survey (CMPS), 2016. Los Angeles; 2017. 27.Barreto MA, Frasure-Yokley L, Vargas ED, Wong J. Best practices in collecting online data with Asian, Black, Latino, and White respondents: evidence from the 2016 Collaborative Multiracial Post-election Survey. Politics, Groups, and Identities. 2018;6(1):171–80. Article  Google Scholar  28.Barreto M, Segura G. Latino America: How America’s most dynamic population is poised to transform the politics of the nation: Public Affairs; 2014. 29.Cadenas GA, Bernstein BL, Tracey TJ. Critical consciousness and intent to persist through college in DACA and US citizen students: the role of immigration status, race, and ethnicity. Cult Divers Ethn Minor Psychol. 2018;24(4):564–75. Article  Google Scholar  30.Rapa LJ, Diemer MA, Bañales J. Critical action as a pathway to social mobility among marginalized youth. Dev Psychol. 2018;54(1):127–37. Article  Google Scholar  31.Freire P. Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum 1970; 2007. Google Scholar  32.United States Census. Place of birth for the foreign-born population in the United States. Washington, DC: United States Census Bureau; 2010. Google Scholar  33.Mapping Police Violence. National Trends 2018. Google Scholar  Download references Author information Affiliations T. Denny Sanford School of Social and Family Dynamics, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA Eleanor K. Seaton School of Social Transformation, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA Aggie J. Yellow Horse, Hyung Chol Yoo & Edward Vargas Authors Eleanor K. SeatonView author publications You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar Aggie J. Yellow HorseView author publications You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar Hyung Chol YooView author publications You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar Edward VargasView author publications You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar Corresponding author Correspondence to Eleanor K. Seaton. Ethics declarations Conflict of Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Additional information Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. The original version of this article was revised: The names of two coauthors of this article were updated following the article’s original publication: The names “Aggie Noah” and “Brandon Yoo” are now given in the article’s author line as “Aggie J. Yellow Horse” and “Hyung Chol Yoo”, respectively. Rights and permissions Reprints and Permissions About this article Cite this article Seaton, E.K., Yellow Horse, A.J., Yoo, H.C. et al. Health Implications of Black Lives Matter Among Black Adults. J. Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities 7, 1241–1248 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-020-00749-z Download citation Received: 08 January 2020 Revised: 15 March 2020 Accepted: 31 March 2020 Published: 21 April 2020 Issue Date: December 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-020-00749-z Keywords Black lives matter Black American Adults Physical health Indicator Access options Buy single article Instant access to the full article PDF. US$ 39.95 Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout. Subscribe to journal Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually. US$ 79 Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout. Rent this article via DeepDyve. Learn more about Institutional subscriptions Advertisement Over 10 million scientific documents at your fingertips Switch Edition Academic Edition Corporate Edition Home Impressum Legal information Privacy statement California Privacy Statement How we use cookies Manage cookies/Do not sell my data Accessibility Contact us Not logged in - 128.182.81.34 North East Research Libraries (8200828607) - LYRASIS (3000176756) - Carnegie Mellon University (3000133174) - Carnegie Mellon University Hunt Library (1600047252) Springer Nature © 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Part of Springer Nature. \