This is a list of all the questions and their associated study carrel identifiers. One can learn a lot of the "aboutness" of a text simply by reading the questions.
identifier | question |
---|---|
18818 | How has the small stock of words found as the basis of a language been thus combined and modified? |
30867 | And if we wait, where does he come down, I ask you? 30867 At this speed?" |
30867 | Bannister, can you hear me? |
30867 | Bannister, do you know what it feels like to be tied into a barrel and tossed over Victoria Falls? 30867 Campbell? |
30867 | Harry, what are you doing? 30867 How about emergency controls?" |
30867 | So? |
30867 | Therefore you would say not yet? |
30867 | What''s it like? |
30867 | With a switch- off on the automatic, if they fail? |
30867 | Yes, Dennis, but what do you see? 30867 *****Now do you understand about the manual controls?" |
30867 | Are the three minutes up yet? |
30867 | Bannister, do you hear me? |
30867 | Because of the monkey? |
30867 | But can you see the screen? |
30867 | Do you hear me? |
30867 | Do you? |
30867 | Harry, how long was I out?" |
30867 | How are you?" |
30867 | How long was I out?" |
30867 | Now what do you say?" |
30867 | WHAT NEED of MAN? |
30867 | What are they set for?" |
30867 | What do you see?" |
30867 | What''s wrong? |
30867 | Who was it said that? |
30867 | Would you attempt a rudder manipulation in a vertical dive?" |
30867 | You do n''t understand, do you? |
12629 | Whom are you looking at? |
12629 | Whom did you see? |
12629 | Whom did you see? |
12629 | Whom did you see? |
12629 | [ 67] But is the Nootka correlate ofthe small fires in the house"the true equivalent of an English"_ the house- firelets_"? |
12629 | [ 6] What, then, is the objective criterion of the word? 12629 And is one point of view sufficient? 12629 And what types of concepts make up the content of these formal patterns? 12629 Are the subjective value of_ he_ and the objective value of_ him_ entirely, or even mainly, dependent on the difference of form? 12629 Are there resistances of a more intimate nature to the borrowing of words? 12629 Are we not giving language a power to change of its own accord over and above the involuntary tendency of individuals to vary the norm? 12629 Are we not on safe ground then? 12629 Are we, after all, justified in identifying it with a radical element? 12629 But are there not certain ideas that it is impossible to render except by way of such and such parts of speech? 12629 But is not the word, one may object, as much of an abstraction as the radical element? 12629 But was the sequence of phonetic changes anaccident"? |
12629 | But what if language is not so much a garment as a prepared road or groove? |
12629 | Can it be that so common a word as_ its_ is actually beginning to be difficult? |
12629 | Can such a concept as that of plurality ever be classified with the more material concepts of group II? |
12629 | Does it represent a simple correspondence between concept and linguistic expression? |
12629 | Does the breath pass freely through the mouth or is it impeded at some point and, if so, in what manner? |
12629 | Does the breath pass into the mouth alone or is it also allowed to stream into the nose? |
12629 | Does the difficulty of classification prove the uselessness of the task? |
12629 | Even now we may go so far as to say that the majority of us are secretly wishing they could say"Who did you see?" |
12629 | How are we to explain these and hundreds of similar phonetic convergences? |
12629 | How did such strikingly individual alternations as_ fot_:_ fet_,_ fuoss_:_ füesse_ develop? |
12629 | How do the peoples of the given area divide themselves as cultural beings? |
12629 | How is it with the alternation of subjective and objective in the pronoun? |
12629 | If function is not the ultimate criterion of the word, what is? |
12629 | Is it not as arbitrarily lifted out of the living sentence as is the minimum conceptual element out of the word? |
12629 | Is it only accidental that these dialects are spoken in proximity to French, which makes abundant use of nasalized vowels? |
12629 | Is it too doomed to disappear? |
12629 | Is not_ inikw- ihl-''minih-''is- it_ necessarily a verb:"several small fires were burning in the house"? |
12629 | Is the formative slant clearly towards the agglutinative method? |
12629 | Is the fusing technique thereby set off as the essence of inflection? |
12629 | Is thought possible without language? |
12629 | It is rather an abbreviated form of some such sentence as"Who, did you say, is coming to- night?" |
12629 | It is safe to prophesy that within a couple of hundred years from to- day not even the most learned jurist will be saying"Whom did you see?" |
12629 | John, a little taken aback, might mutter"Did you say me?" |
12629 | Must we not then hold to the preposition? |
12629 | Not quite relevant enough, the grammarian may remark, for a sentence like"Who did you say?" |
12629 | On what basis shall we classify? |
12629 | Ought not the norm, wherever and whenever threatened, automatically to reassert itself? |
12629 | Probably the majority of those who read these words feel that it is quite"incorrect"to say"Who did you see?" |
12629 | So are the numeral, the interrogative pronoun( e.g.,"to be what? |
12629 | The folk says_ it is me_, not_ it is I_, which is"correct"but just as falsely so as the_ whom did you see_? |
12629 | The more radical solution_ Who did you see?_ is the one the language is gradually making for. |
12629 | The solution_ Did you see whom?_ or_ You saw whom?_[135] is too contrary to the idiomatic drift of our language to receive acceptance. |
12629 | The speaker and hearer feel the word, let us grant, but how shall we justify their feeling? |
12629 | The uneducated folk that says"Who did you see?" |
12629 | There is likely to be a little hesitation in the choice of the form, but the precedent of usages like"Whom did you see?" |
12629 | They are common enough, but are they as alive, as little petrified or bookish, as our English_-ness_ and_-ful_ and_ un-_?] |
12629 | Threefold classification suggested: what types of concepts are expressed? |
12629 | Was the pre- Anglo- Saxon alternation of_ fot_ and_ föti_ an absolutely mechanical matter, without other than incidental morphological interest? |
12629 | We are likely to avoid the locution altogether and to say"Who was it you saw?" |
12629 | We do not secretly chafe at"Whom did you see?" |
12629 | We have discovered no less than four factors which enter into our subtle disinclination to say"Whom did you see?" |
12629 | We readers of many books are still very careful to say"Whom did you see?" |
12629 | What are the formal patterns of the language? |
12629 | What are the precise points of articulation in the mouth? |
12629 | What are we to do with the fusional and symbolic languages that do not express relational concepts in the word but leave them to the sentence? |
12629 | What can be done with the"to"of"he came to the house"? |
12629 | What if we add the preterit tense suffix_-it_? |
12629 | What point of view shall we adopt for our classification? |
12629 | Why emphasize both a technique and a particular content at one and the same time? |
12629 | Would we be so ready to die for"liberty,"to struggle for"ideals,"if the words themselves were not ringing within us? |
12629 | Yet the case is more hollow than the grammarian thinks it to be, for in reply to such a query as"You''re a good hand at bridge, John, are n''t you?" |
12629 | Yet the logic for the latter("Did you say I was a good hand at bridge?") |
12629 | You have not caught the name and ask, not"Whom did you say?" |
12629 | [ 171] Does it follow that the voiceless_ l_ of language B has had the same history? |
12629 | [ Footnote 132:"Its"was at one time as impertinent a departure as the"who"of"Who did you see?" |
12629 | [ Footnote 142: Aside from the interrogative:_ am I?__ is he?_ Emphasis counts for something. |
12629 | [ Footnote 142: Aside from the interrogative:_ am I?__ is he?_ Emphasis counts for something. |
12629 | but"Who did you say?" |
12629 | hardly"Did you say I?" |
12629 | is not strictly analogous to"Whom did you see?" |
12629 | might do for an epitaph, but"Who did you see?" |
12629 | or does that farmer( who lives in your neighborhood and whom we see over there) kill that duckling( that belongs to him)? |
12629 | or"Whom did you mean?" |
12629 | what is the degree of synthesis? |
12629 | what is the prevailing technique? |
12629 | will probably not seem quite strong enough to induce a"Whom did you say?" |
13182 | And know ye not,said he,"what it is worth? |
13182 | Chimène,_ who''d have thought it_? 13182 How,"said he,"are ye here a soul priest or a parish priest?" |
13182 | The Cid speaks in verse? 13182 What''s that?" |
13182 | Why should we then call such a cause rather Nature, than God? |
13182 | Why,said he,"what shall it be worth?" |
13182 | [ 12] But those things which we are told were seals of the Gospel, shall we pervert to undermine the faith of the Gospel? 13182 ''Quid te exempta juvat spinis de pluribus una?'' 13182 ''So seemed,''and to whom seemed? 13182 --How would you have him speak, pray?" |
13182 | And I see no good answer that can be made to this objection: if the world were eternal, why not all things in the world eternal? |
13182 | And a woman said to him,"Wilt thou have any other woman than me?" |
13182 | And did not the pastoral character belong to Aaron, and the other rulers of Israel? |
13182 | And he answered to her,"Art not ashamed to offer thyself to him that demandeth nor desireth thee not?" |
13182 | And he said unto his disciples:"Will ye that I enseign and teach you how ye shall now escape from all evil?" |
13182 | And how does it survive but through the People? |
13182 | And if they should then send for more people, thinking that in that way they might manage it, would he not think them all the madder? |
13182 | And if we grant Nature this will, and this understanding, this course, reason, and power:"Cur Natura potius quam Deus nominetur?" |
13182 | And then, would it not he better always to write treatises based on a poem, than to write poems based on a treatise? |
13182 | And they demanded him why he fled from the women? |
13182 | And they said to him and demanded wherefore he blamed so women? |
13182 | And what are the conditions of race, epoch, and environment the best adapted to produce this moral state? |
13182 | And what can other men hope, whose blessed or sorrowful estates after death God hath reserved? |
13182 | And what has been given us in exchange for the eagle feathers stolen from Corneille and Racine? |
13182 | And what were this, but to believe again in the old play of the gods? |
13182 | And where is it to exist? |
13182 | And where lies the real difficulty of creating that taste by which a truly original poet is to be relished? |
13182 | And whom are we to copy, I pray to know? |
13182 | And why? |
13182 | And with what are they connected? |
13182 | Are its disposals without ignominious distinctions? |
13182 | Are the times so much more reform''d now than they were five and twenty years ago? |
13182 | Both doth it follow, that the positions of heathen philosophers are undoubted grounds and principles indeed, because so called? |
13182 | But can we demand of the bird that he fly under the receiver of an air- pump? |
13182 | But hereof how shall the upright and impartial judgment of man give a sentence, where opposition and examination are not admitted to give in evidence? |
13182 | But how often among the Jewish people was it so disorganized, as to have no visible form left? |
13182 | But if the pious at such periods had sought for any form evident to their senses, must not their hearts have been quite discouraged? |
13182 | But if we ask a reason of this cause, why the sourness doth it? |
13182 | But that would be poetry-- folly, perhaps--- and_ what does it prove_? |
13182 | But what makes a word obsolete, more than general agreement to forbear it? |
13182 | But what of all this? |
13182 | But what was his end? |
13182 | But what would those admirable men have done if they had been left to themselves? |
13182 | But who will not willingly agree that pure observation is more rare than is believed? |
13182 | But with what justice is it condemned? |
13182 | By what right does the actor, whose name is Pierre or Jacques, take the name of the Cid? |
13182 | Convicted of what crime? |
13182 | Did the ancients ever exhibit the ugly or the grotesque? |
13182 | Did they ever mingle comedy and tragedy? |
13182 | Did you suppose there could be only one Supreme? |
13182 | Do n''t you know that art should correct nature? |
13182 | Does a memorandum book constitute a psychology? |
13182 | Does it improve manners? |
13182 | Does it live through them? |
13182 | Does it solve readily with the sweet milk of the nipples of the breasts of the mother of many children? |
13182 | Does it still hold on untired? |
13182 | Does the young man think often of him? |
13182 | Does this acknowledge liberty with audible and absolute acknowledgment, and set slavery at nought for life and death? |
13182 | Does this answer? |
13182 | Does wine-- we beg pardon for another trivial illustration-- does wine cease to be wine when it is bottled? |
13182 | For as the Prophet Isaiah cried out long ago,"Lord, who hath believed our reports?" |
13182 | For if all were equal why not equal conditions to all? |
13182 | For shall we say, that it is out of affection to the earth, that heavy things fall towards it? |
13182 | For to which party will they give the title of the Church? |
13182 | For what do they otherwise, that die this kind of well- dying, but say unto God as followeth? |
13182 | For what is done now? |
13182 | For when Christianity, the religion of humility, is founded upon the proudest faculty of our nature, what can be expected but contradictions? |
13182 | Has any one fancied he could sit at last under some due authority and rest satisfied with explanations and realize and be content and full? |
13182 | Has it too the old ever- fresh forbearance and impartiality? |
13182 | Have the fleshly naiads, the muscular Tritons, the wanton Zephyrs, the diaphanous transparency of our water- sprites and sylphs? |
13182 | Have the marches of tens and hundreds and thousands of years made willing detours to the right hand and the left hand for his sake? |
13182 | How long shall sloth usurp thy useless hours, Unnerve thy vigour, and enchain thy powers? |
13182 | How long wilt thou sleep, O Sluggard? |
13182 | How many wives did he cut off, and cast off, as his fancy and affection changed? |
13182 | How often, since that time, have wars, seditions, and heresies, oppressed and totally obscured it? |
13182 | How was it received? |
13182 | How, for example, can one tolerate kings and queens who swear? |
13182 | How, then, can his language differ in any material degree from that of all other men who feel vividly and see clearly? |
13182 | II On observing the visible man with your own eyes what do you try to find in him? |
13182 | If his drama is worthless, what is the use of upholding it? |
13182 | If it is good, why defend it? |
13182 | If the changes that we fear be thus irresistible, what remains but to acquiesce with silence, as in the other insurmountable distresses of humanity? |
13182 | If they had lived at that period, would they have believed that any Church existed? |
13182 | If this were wit, was this a time to be witty, when the poor wretch was in the agony of death? |
13182 | Is he beloved long and long after he is buried? |
13182 | Is it for the ever growing communes of brothers and lovers, large, well- united, proud beyond the old models, generous beyond all models? |
13182 | Is it for the nursing of the young of the republic? |
13182 | Is it in breaking the bonds of custom, in overcoming the prejudices of false refinement, and displacing the aversions of inexperience? |
13182 | Is it probable that we are seeking an unlimited license to commit crimes with impunity? |
13182 | Is it something grown fresh out of the fields or drawn from the sea for use to me today here? |
13182 | Is it the result of the whole, that, in the opinion of the Writer, the judgement of the People is not to be respected? |
13182 | Is it uniform with my country? |
13182 | Is the reflection equal to the light? |
13182 | Is the satellite which travels unceasingly in the same circle equal to the central creative planet? |
13182 | Is then the peerage of England anything dishonored, when a peer suffers for his treason? |
13182 | Is there any doubt that they will be seats of Antichrist? |
13182 | It will now be proper to answer an obvious question, namely, Why, professing these opinions, have I written in verse? |
13182 | Lo, what should a man in these days now write, eggs or eyren? |
13182 | Might it not see all things in a new light, since the Gospel had shown it the soul through the senses, eternity behind life? |
13182 | Moreover, what has he ever done that is worth that trouble? |
13182 | Now, in which of these two categories should genius seek a place for itself? |
13182 | Now, what is the Chorus, this anomalous character standing between the spectacle and the spectator, if it be not the poet completing his epic? |
13182 | Or that_ ipsi dixerunt_, doth make them to be such? |
13182 | Or, if names be more acceptable than images, where is the ever to- be- honoured Chaucer? |
13182 | Rodrigue,_ who''d have said it_?" |
13182 | Shall I call thee Bird, Or but a wandering_ Voice_? |
13182 | Shall we call it reason, which doth conduct every river into the salt sea? |
13182 | Shall we term it knowledge in fire, that makes it to consume combustible matter? |
13182 | Shall we therefore value honor and riches at nothing? |
13182 | Taking up the subject, then, upon general grounds, let me ask, what is meant by the word Poet? |
13182 | The ancients? |
13182 | The antique Venus is beautiful, admirable, no doubt; but what has imparted to Jean Goujon''s faces that weird, tender, ethereal delicacy? |
13182 | The living( saith he) know that they shall die, but the dead know nothing at all: for who can show unto man what shall be after him under the sun?" |
13182 | The moderns? |
13182 | Those things which were designed to be testimonials of the truth, shall we accommodate to the confirmation of falsehood? |
13182 | Thus far of an endowing or modifying power: but the Imagination also shapes and_ creates_; and how? |
13182 | Thus shall our healths do others good, Whilst we ourselves do all we would; For, freed from envy and from care, What would we be but what we are? |
13182 | To how many others of more desert gave he abundant flowers from whence to gather honey, and in the end of harvest burnt them in the hive? |
13182 | To whom does he address himself? |
13182 | Was it all these at once? |
13182 | Was it an inward revolution caused by the silence or the murmurs of the populace, discomposed to see their regicide ascend the throne? |
13182 | Was not this abusing God''s holy prophet to the purposes of idolatry? |
13182 | We ask the question of our prose- writers themselves-- what do they lose in Molière''s poetry? |
13182 | What are Aristophanes and Plautus, beside the Homeric colossi, Æschylus, Sophocles, Euripides? |
13182 | What can be done? |
13182 | What can be more probable, than that he who copied that, would have copied more; but that those which were not translated were inaccessible? |
13182 | What constitutes the State other than the sentiment of obedience by which a multitude of men collect together under the authority of a chief? |
13182 | What could be more opposed-- we will not say to the truth, for the scholastics hold it very cheap, but to probability? |
13182 | What could nature and the true lose, then, by entering into verse? |
13182 | What do we find in man at the point of departure? |
13182 | What does it matter to art? |
13182 | What does it matter? |
13182 | What has given them that unfamiliar suggestion of life and grandeur, if not the proximity of the rough and powerful sculptures of the Middle Ages? |
13182 | What is a Poet? |
13182 | What is a philosophy but a conception of nature and of its primordial causes under the form of abstractions and formulas? |
13182 | What is all this but an advance, or a conquest, made by the soul of the poet? |
13182 | What is marvellous? |
13182 | What is the barrow of Thespis beside the Olympian chariots? |
13182 | What laws and wills did he devise to cut off, and cut down those branches, which sprang from the same root that himself did? |
13182 | What modern nation does not owe its artistic culture to the Greeks, and, in certain branches, what nation more than the German? |
13182 | What other distinction would we have? |
13182 | What preserves it but their intellect and their wisdom? |
13182 | What reply should he make to them? |
13182 | What revelations do we find in the calendared leaves of a modern poem? |
13182 | What shall I say more? |
13182 | What splendid form do we suppose could be seen, when Elias deplored his being left alone? |
13182 | What then does the Poet? |
13182 | What was to be done by the apostles in such circumstances? |
13182 | What would Ovid have done on this occasion? |
13182 | When the body changes, how could the coat not change? |
13182 | When the radical idea branches out into parallel ramifications, how can a consecutive series be formed of senses in their nature collateral? |
13182 | Whence arises this difference? |
13182 | Whence is it to come? |
13182 | Where are we to look for that initiatory composure of mind which no selfishness can disturb? |
13182 | Where did anyone ever see a porch or peristyle of that sort? |
13182 | Where is the bright Elizabethan constellation? |
13182 | Wherein, pray, do the Greek stage and drama resemble our stage and drama? |
13182 | Whither then shall we turn for that union of qualifications which must necessarily exist before the decisions of a critic can be of absolute value? |
13182 | Who answered to him again,"And what sayest thou by our good mothers, and of our sisters?" |
13182 | Who ever saw a medal without its reverse? |
13182 | Who has not experienced what advantages are afforded in such cases by conversation? |
13182 | Who is there that now reads the_ Creation_ of Dubartas? |
13182 | Who knows the curious mystery of the eyesight? |
13182 | Who made it? |
13182 | Who said the first? |
13182 | Who said the last? |
13182 | Who would want to part with a word of either of them? |
13182 | Who, then, will wonder at its becoming the object of public odium, where credit is given to such most iniquitous accusations? |
13182 | Whom shall we copy, then? |
13182 | Why attach one''s self to a master, or graft one''s self upon a model? |
13182 | Why do you study the shell unless to form some idea of the animal? |
13182 | Why should heavenly bodies live forever; and the bodies of men rot and die? |
13182 | Why take pains to prove than an ape is not a Newton, when it is self- evident that he is not a man? |
13182 | Why trouble yourself about the species till you have previously decided upon the genus? |
13182 | Will it help breed one goodshaped and wellhung man, and a woman to be his perfect and independent mate? |
13182 | Will the same style and the direction of genius to similar points be satisfactory now? |
13182 | Will they acknowledge Eugenius to be a schismatic, with all his adherents, by whom they have all been consecrated? |
13182 | Would any man who is ready to die for love describe his passion like Narcissus? |
13182 | Would it not be niggardly to assign it two hours only, and give up the rest of the performance to opera- comique or farce? |
13182 | Would the poet dare to murder Rizzio elsewhere than in Mary Stuart''s chamber? |
13182 | You imagine that this is all? |
13182 | [ 38] How long, after the coming of Christ, did it remain without any external form? |
13182 | [ 41] According to this mode of reasoning, why should not the four hundred prophets, who lied to Ahab, have represented the Church? |
13182 | a talent that had not some shadow with its brilliancy, some smoke with its flame? |
13182 | and do the middle aged and the old think of him? |
13182 | and neglect them, as unnecessary and vain? |
13182 | and the manner how? |
13182 | and the young woman think often of him? |
13182 | he will continue, if he is consistent;"the Cid is speaking French!"--"Well?" |
13182 | or is it without reference to universal needs? |
13182 | or old needs of pleasure overlaid by modern science or forms? |
13182 | or sprung of the needs of the less developed society of special ranks? |
13182 | that we must_ ennoble_ art? |
13182 | that we must_ select_? |
13182 | to burn Jeanne d''Arc elsewhere than in the Vieux- Marché? |
13182 | to despatch the Duc de Guise elsewhere than in that chateau of Blois where his ambition roused a popular assemblage to frenzy? |
13182 | to stab Henri IV elsewhere than in Rue de la Ferronerie, all blocked with drays and carriages? |
13182 | what is impossible or baseless or vague? |
13182 | what is unlikely? |
13182 | when wilt thou arise out of thy sleep? |
13182 | where Sidney? |
13182 | where is Spenser? |
13182 | whereby it doth it? |