id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
cord-011234-awbubjy4	Acevedo, Edwin	Outcomes in conventional laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted revisional bariatric surgery: a retrospective, case–controlled study of the MBSAQIP database	2019-06-17		.txt	text/plain	3894	184	29	This study represents the largest case-controlled retrospective review of the MBSAQIP PUF database comparing perioperative outcomes in laparoscopic-and robotic-assisted revisional/ conversional bariatric surgery. Our case-control matched analysis of 2288 revisional bariatric cases revealed longer operative duration and hospital length of stay, and higher rates of ICU admission, aggregate leak and bleeding complications in the robotic-assisted bariatric surgery compared to conventional laparoscopy. Taking into consideration the above outlined study limitations, the findings of this case-control matched analysis comparing these two surgical approaches for revision/conversion metabolic and bariatric surgery show that using the robotic platform is overall safe, but is associated with longer operative times and a higher rate of some perioperative outcome measures.	./cache/cord-011234-awbubjy4.txt	./txt/cord-011234-awbubjy4.txt