Summary of your 'study carrel' ============================== This is a summary of your Distant Reader 'study carrel'. The Distant Reader harvested & cached your content into a collection/corpus. It then applied sets of natural language processing and text mining against the collection. The results of this process was reduced to a database file -- a 'study carrel'. The study carrel can then be queried, thus bringing light specific characteristics for your collection. These characteristics can help you summarize the collection as well as enumerate things you might want to investigate more closely. Eric Lease Morgan May 27, 2019 Number of items in the collection; 'How big is my corpus?' ---------------------------------------------------------- 4 Average length of all items measured in words; "More or less, how big is each item?" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 25263 Average readability score of all items (0 = difficult; 100 = easy) ------------------------------------------------------------------ 54 Top 50 statistically significant keywords; "What is my collection about?" ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 privacy 1 observation 1 love 1 human 1 german 1 genetic 1 gene 1 dna 1 disease 1 conversion 1 chinese 1 change 1 Verschuer 1 Research 1 Reich 1 Rambo 1 Race 1 Office 1 New 1 Nachtsheim 1 Mengele 1 Magnussen 1 Lenz 1 KWI 1 Institute 1 Harvard 1 Grebe 1 God 1 Genetic 1 Fischer 1 Diehl 1 Department 1 Dahlem 1 Conti 1 China 1 Berlin 1 Auschwitz 1 Anhui 1 Adele 1 Abel Top 50 lemmatized nouns; "What is discussed?" --------------------------------------------- 341 research 221 gene 217 race 210 time 197 institute 167 case 160 project 160 conversion 157 war 141 p. 135 child 132 disease 123 study 123 experiment 120 year 119 work 119 privacy 117 rabbit 117 question 113 person 108 way 107 family 105 observation 96 people 91 state 91 animal 90 change 90 camp 86 human 86 eye 83 blood 82 scientist 82 practice 76 process 76 examination 72 material 70 fact 68 pathology 68 member 68 institution 67 part 67 interest 67 course 65 science 64 tuberculosis 64 life 64 genetic 63 report 61 result 61 area Top 50 proper nouns; "What are the names of persons or places?" -------------------------------------------------------------- 337 Verschuer 288 Fischer 182 God 137 Nachtsheim 123 Mengele 118 China 116 KWI 108 Lenz 101 Reich 101 Magnussen 84 Research 80 A 79 Auschwitz 76 Department 71 Rambo 69 Abel 68 der 68 Xu 68 Dahlem 66 Race 64 Institute 62 Berlin 61 Office 61 Genetic 59 . 58 Diehl 56 SS 56 Conti 52 University 52 Horneck 49 pp 49 Grebe 47 Adele 45 March 42 National 42 Hans 40 German 38 Frankfurt 37 War 37 Telschow 37 Gypsy 36 October 35 Pathology 35 Jews 35 Association 35 Anhui 33 September 33 II 31 von 31 Hygiene Top 50 personal pronouns nouns; "To whom are things referred?" ------------------------------------------------------------- 568 it 451 he 239 i 155 we 147 they 90 she 67 them 60 him 55 me 47 you 46 himself 42 one 41 us 19 themselves 19 her 8 myself 8 itself 5 herself 4 oneself 1 yours 1 themelves 1 ourselves 1 ours Top 50 lemmatized verbs; "What do things do?" --------------------------------------------- 3429 be 987 have 298 do 151 take 142 make 112 know 100 work 89 come 87 become 78 hold 77 use 77 continue 72 seem 72 remain 70 find 69 perform 68 call 67 give 64 involve 63 write 62 provide 60 go 56 follow 54 send 52 appear 51 see 50 receive 50 include 50 argue 49 show 48 begin 48 accord 47 bring 46 support 46 require 46 report 46 establish 46 develop 45 want 45 mention 43 publish 41 base 39 regard 38 suggest 38 observe 38 get 37 change 36 present 36 believe 35 understand Top 50 lemmatized adjectives and adverbs; "How are things described?" --------------------------------------------------------------------- 571 not 296 genetic 292 also 202 human 179 more 177 other 171 only 155 even 140 well 130 first 126 however 117 so 110 such 109 up 108 thus 108 new 93 further 91 as 88 many 86 scientific 84 then 80 very 78 same 76 total 75 possible 74 out 71 moral 70 long 69 still 69 just 68 great 67 here 62 high 62 certain 61 now 61 most 60 own 60 institutional 60 important 56 able 54 too 53 large 53 different 52 several 52 especially 50 often 50 individual 50 - 49 early 48 chinese Top 50 lemmatized superlative adjectives; "How are things described to the extreme?" ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 36 least 17 most 17 good 11 great 9 Most 5 high 4 close 3 late 3 large 3 early 2 low 1 wide 1 strong 1 strict 1 shy 1 pure 1 healthy 1 fine 1 deep 1 big 1 bad 1 -that Top 50 lemmatized superlative adverbs; "How do things do to the extreme?" ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 44 most 7 least 5 well 1 -thus Top 50 Internet domains; "What Webbed places are alluded to in this corpus?" ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 www.decode Top 50 URLs; "What is hyperlinked from this corpus?" ---------------------------------------------------- 1 http://www.decode Top 50 email addresses; "Who are you gonna call?" ------------------------------------------------- Top 50 positive assertions; "What sentences are in the shape of noun-verb-noun?" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 god is morally 3 lenz did not 3 projects did not 2 conversion is also 2 god is justified 2 god knows everything 2 mengele did not 2 mengele was not 2 nachtsheim was able 2 privacy has not 2 privacy is best 2 studies are practically 2 verschuer had already 2 verschuer was interested 2 verschuer was not 1 case is vastly 1 case was due 1 child taken away 1 child was so 1 children are overweight 1 children is still 1 china did not 1 china had already 1 china using materials 1 conversion involves empathy 1 conversion involves interpersonal 1 conversion involves reflexivity 1 conversion is deep 1 conversion is illuminating 1 conversion is many 1 conversion is not 1 conversion is possible 1 disease called cystic 1 disease is then 1 diseases is unlikely 1 diseases using population 1 diseases were also 1 experiment did not 1 experiment took place 1 experiments had not 1 experiments performed privately 1 experiments performed there 1 family had fewer 1 family included several 1 family is not 1 family was also 1 family was subject 1 fischer did not 1 fischer had finally 1 fischer had long Top 50 negative assertions; "What sentences are in the shape of noun-verb-no|not-noun?" --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 verschuer was not able 1 family is not alone 1 fischer had no opportunity 1 fischer had not yet 1 gene did not necessarily 1 god is not something 1 institute was not as 1 mengele was not able 1 nachtsheim was not exactly 1 privacy is not necessary 1 rabbits were not comparable 1 research did not simply Sizes of items; "Measures in words, how big is each item?" ---------------------------------------------------------- 67488 cord-016078-1g39jebq 12487 cord-280691-nzc8ir0n 11118 cord-021113-e4ya7llm 9957 cord-322527-m1ig1hii Readability of items; "How difficult is each item to read?" ----------------------------------------------------------- 59.0 cord-021113-e4ya7llm 56.0 cord-016078-1g39jebq 52.0 cord-280691-nzc8ir0n 50.0 cord-322527-m1ig1hii Item summaries; "In a narrative form, how can each item be abstracted?" ----------------------------------------------------------------------- cord-016078-1g39jebq Third and finally, it was to be attempted to influence the outbreak of disease by environmental stimuli (poisons, chemicals, feeding), not least in order to be able to differentiate between a "general" and a "genetically increased" susceptibility, which, according to Fischer, was "of particular importance in view of the most modern methods of treating diseased humans." At the close of his application Fischer stated his conviction "that these theoretical and experimental studies will be of benefit to suffering humanity and serve the preservation of the genetic health of our Volk." Mentioning discreetly that the Reichsgesundheitsführer shared his views, Fischer guaranteed that he could "carry the full responsibility" for the importance of Nachtsheim''s research "even now at a time of war." When Nachtsheim started in Dahlem, he had at his disposition, as Fischer informed the DFG, a series of rabbit strains that exhibited genetic diseases or disabilities: These were "genetic epilepsy […], shaking palsies and other nervous diseases; glaucoma and other eye diseases; deformation of the limbs, the external sex organs (similar to those of humans), harelip and cleft palate and many others." 239 From Nachtsheim''s report to the German Research Association of January 14, 1941 -the first he submitted from his new position in Dahlem -proceed the work emphases of the group of scientists around Nachtsheim in 1940, that is, still at the Institute for Genetics and Breeding Research. cord-021113-e4ya7llm If so, it seems that these traditional theologies face a moral problem: God''s total observation violates human privacy in a way that seems wrong in most human contexts. We shall begin our discussion by developing further the problem of human privacy posed by traditional Jewish, Islamic, and Christian conceptions of God. As we have just mentioned, theologians in these traditions hold that God engages in a seemingly relentless form of total observation. So while omniscience may excuse God''s total observation, it simply does not follow without any further argument that human privacy has not been violated, that something morally bad has not occurred. He or she could (i) accept that one or both of (1) and (2) are correct, and hence hold that total observation is always-even for God-prima facie morally wrong or bad, but then argue that some set of higher principles justifies the infringement of human privacy. cord-280691-nzc8ir0n Around 1997, and amid the talks of Hong Kong''s upcoming return to China and later the Asian financial crisis, a recurring topic in the Chinese media was the so-called ''''gene war of the century'''': the lopsided condemnation of foreign scientists coming purportedly to pilfer China''s vast genetic resources for a profit. Despite his repeated proclamation as a staunch and unwavering patriot loyal to his beloved motherland and dedicated to the advancement of China''s science and technology, he nonetheless later became embroiled in an avalanche of controversies surrounding the ''''gene war.'''' He effectively became a lightning rod for all the controversy on genetic resources, intellectual rights, informed consent, and the protection of human research subjects. (2) Chinese scientists should immediately grasp the opportunity to find disease genes and patent them; (3) We should educate the people, and raise the awareness and importance of protection of our genetic resources; (4) We welcome all international collaborations based on fairness and mutual benefits; (5) Through various avenues, the Chinese scientists should be vocal about certain views deemed to be harmful to China''s genetic research (Xiao et al. cord-322527-m1ig1hii In the following sections, I will describe four elements of institutional conversion that flow from the conversation between Lewis Rambo''s decades of research on religious conversion and what I was hearing as a pointed call for change in Adele''s "Send My Love To Your New Lover." I locate these insights in the realm of theological education, where I work, but imagine they could help illustrate similar dynamics in other areas of higher education and institutional life. Bringing Adele and Rambo into conversation, I distinguish four practices that could loosen institutional stuckness in order to motivate institutions who still want to keep moving through a decolonizing conversion process: (1) untangling initial inclusion from completed conversion, (2) truth-telling about desires not to convert, or resistances, (3) detangling toe-dipping from being in over our heads, and (4) (re)engaging a commissioning call and response in order to (re)commit to conversions in practice.