af-wikipedia-org-9512 ---- Horatius - Wikipedia Horatius in Wikipedia, die vrye ensiklopedie Jump to navigation Jump to search Horatius Horatuis, deur Anton von Werner Gebore Quintus Horatius Flaccus 8 Desember 65 v.C. Venusia, Italië, Romeinse Republiek Sterf 27 November 8 v.C. (op 56) Rome, Romeinse Republiek Nasionaliteit Romeinse Republiek Beroep soldaat, scriba quaestorius, digter Bekend vir Ode, Satire, Ars Poetica Quintus Horatius Flaccus (8 Desember 65 v.C. — 27 November 8 v.C.) was 'n Romeinse digter in die era van keiser Augustus. Lewe[wysig | wysig bron] Horatius is gebore in Venusia, 'n klein dorpie tussen Apulia en Lucania. Horatius was die seun van 'n vrygestelde slaaf. Sy pa het 'n plaas gehad in Venusia, maar het later verhuis na Rome waar hy 'n middelman was by 'n afslaer. Horatius se vader het baie geld op Horatius se opvoeding gespandeer waar Horatius in Rome sowel as Athene gestudeer het. Nadat Julius Caesar vermoor is, het Horatius by die Romeinse legioene aangesluit onder die generaalskap van Brutus. Hy het by die slag van Philippi geveg en nadat Augustus 'n amnestie uitgereik het, het Horatius na Rome teruggekeer. Horatius word as een van die grootste Romeinse digters beskou. Werke en opsteldatums[wysig | wysig bron] Sermonum liber primus of Satirae I (35 v.C.) Epodes (30 v.C.) Sermonum liber secundus of Satirae II (30 v.C.) Carminum liber primus of die Odes I (30 v.C.) Carminum liber secundus of die Odes II (23 v.C.) Carminum liber tertius of die Odes III (23 v.C.) Epistularum liber primus (20 v.C.) Ars Poetica, of die Episte van die Pisone (18 v.C.) Carmen Saeculare of die lied van die eue (17 v.C.) Epistularum liber secundus (14 v.C.) Carminum liber quartus of die Odes IV (13 v.C.) Normdata BIBSYS: 90055203 BNC: 000035928 BNE: XX891549 BNF: cb11886570b (data) CANTIC: a10101214 CiNii: DA00782980 GND: 118553569 ISNI: 0000 0001 2145 2178 LCCN: n79081354 LNB: 000000375 MusicBrainz: af616f1f-6242-4802-a1bf-8d3f0647083c NDL: 00540086 NKC: jn20000603003 NLA: 35206138 NLG: 62641 NLI: 000064806 NLK: KAC199612791 NLP: A11793144 NSK: 000013522 NTA: 068304579 RERO: 02-A000081296 RSL: 000083136 ICCU: IT\ICCU\CFIV\000246 SELIBR: 189659 SNAC: w6pk0m9c SUDOC: 026659166 Trove: 864697 ULAN: 500404135 VIAF: 100227522 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n79081354 Ontsluit van "https://af.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Horatius&oldid=1784954" Kategorieë: Geboortes in 65 v.C. Mense in die 1ste eeu v.C. Romeinse digters Sterftes in 8 v.C. Versteekte kategorieë: Artikels met hCards Artikels met BIBSYS-identifiseerders Artikels met BNC-identifiseerders Artikels met BNE-identifiseerders Artikels met BNF-identifiseerders Artikels met CANTIC-identifiseerders Artikels met CINII-identifiseerders Artikels met GND-identifiseerders Artikels met ISNI-identifiseerders Artikels met LCCN-identifiseerders Artikels met LNB-identifiseerders Artikels met MusicBrainz-identifiseerders Artikels met NDL-identifiseerders Artikels met NKC-identifiseerders Artikels met NLA-identifiseerders Artikels met NLG-identifiseerders Artikels met NLI-identifiseerders Artikels met NLK-identifiseerders Artikels met NLP-identifiseerders Artikels met NSK-identifiseerders Artikels met NTA-identifiseerders Artikels met RERO-identifiseerders Artikels met RSL-identifiseerders Artikels met SBN-identifiseerders Artikels met SELIBR-identifiseerders Artikels met SNAC-ID-identifiseerders Artikels met SUDOC-identifiseerders Artikels met Trove-identifiseerders Artikels met ULAN-identifiseerders Artikels met VIAF-identifiseerders Artikels met WorldCat-identifiseerders Normdata met 29 elemente Navigasie-keuseskerm Persoonlike gereedskap Nie ingeteken nie Bespreking Bydraes Skep gebruiker Meld aan Naamruimtes Bladsy Bespreking Variante Weergawes Lees Wysig Wysig bron Wys geskiedenis More Soek Navigasie Tuisblad Gebruikersportaal Geselshoekie Onlangse wysigings Lukrake bladsy Hulp Sandput Skenkings Gereedskap Skakels hierheen Verwante veranderings Spesiale bladsye Permanente skakel Bladinligting Haal dié blad aan Wikidata-item Druk/eksporteer Skep boek Laai af as PDF Drukbare weergawe Ander projekte Wikimedia Commons Ander tale አማርኛ Aragonés العربية مصرى Asturianu تۆرکجه Башҡортса Žemaitėška Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ Български Brezhoneg Bosanski Català Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Zazaki Ελληνικά English Esperanto Español Eesti Euskara فارسی Suomi Võro Français Furlan Gaeilge Galego עברית हिन्दी Fiji Hindi Hrvatski Magyar Հայերեն Interlingua Bahasa Indonesia Ido Íslenska Italiano 日本語 ქართული Қазақша 한국어 Kurdî Kernowek Latina Lingua Franca Nova Lietuvių Latviešu Malagasy Македонски മലയാളം Монгол मराठी Bahasa Melayu Nāhuatl Nederlands Norsk nynorsk Norsk bokmål Occitan ਪੰਜਾਬੀ Polski Piemontèis Português Română Tarandíne Русский Sardu Sicilianu Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Simple English Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Seeltersk Svenska Kiswahili தமிழ் Tagalog Türkçe Татарча/tatarça Українська Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча Tiếng Việt Volapük Walon Winaray 吴语 中文 粵語 Wysig skakels Die bladsy is laas op 7 September 2018 om 12:01 bygewerk. Die teks is beskikbaar onder die lisensie Creative Commons Erkenning-Insgelyks Deel. Aanvullende voorwaardes kan moontlik ook van toepassing wees. Sien die Algemene Voorwaardes vir meer inligting. Privaatheidsbeleid Inligting oor Wikipedia Vrywaring Selfoonweergawe Ontwikkelaars Statistieke Koekieverklaring aleph-nkp-cz-1770 ---- AUT - Full View of Record   Databases of the National Library CR Base:  AUT   Logout | Login | Databases | Preferences | Feedback | Help Search / Browse | Results list | Previous searches | My e-Shelf | History |     Add to Basket  |  Save / Mail   AUT - Full View of Record Choose format:   Standard  --  MARC Record 1 out of 1 Control no. jn20000603003 Heading Horatius, Quintus Flaccus, 65 př. Kr.-8 př. Kr. Seen from Horace, 65 př. Kr.-8 př. Kr. Horacius, 65 př. Kr.-8 př. Kr. Orazio, 65 př. Kr.-8 př. Kr. Horatius Flaccus, Quintus, 65 př. Kr.-8 př. Kr. Kwintus Horacjusz Flakkus, 65 př. Kr.-8 př. Kr. Biogr./Hist. data Římský básník, autor satirické i reflexivní a filozofující lyriky. Source MZK(OPAC) - forma jména NKC Všeobecná encyklopedie Diderot 3. - biografická poznámka Ódy a epódy Jeho: Dzieła wszystkie - odkaz viz More info Wikipedie (Quintus Horatius Flaccus)  Permalink http://aleph.nkp.cz/F/?func=direct&doc_number=000059701&local_base=AUT System no. 000059701 More info: © 2014 Ex Libris, NL CR aleph-rsl-ru-1656 ---- Инд. авторы - Search Results Directory of names of persons End Session | Preferences | Databases | Feedback | Help Browse | Search | Results List | Previous Searches | Basket |       Selected records:     |     |     |     |     |      Whole set:     |     |     |     |    Results for System Number= 000083136; sorted by : Heading Discending Sort options : Heading Asc Heading Disc Records 1 - 1 of 1       # Heading PublicNote 1 Гораций Флакк, Квинт (65-8 до н. э.)   © 2002 Ex Libris am-wikipedia-org-6397 ---- ውክፔዲያ - ሆራቲዩስ ሆራቲዩስ ከውክፔዲያ Jump to navigation Jump to search Horace (ሮማይስጥ፦ Quintus Horatius Flaccus //) ከ65 ዓክልበ. እስከ 8 ዓክልበ. ድረስ የኖረ የጥንቱ ሮሜ ባለቅኔና ደራሲ ነበር። በ"Wikimedia Commons" (የጋራ ፎቶዎች ምንጭ) ስለ Quintus Horatius Flaccus የሚገኛኙ ተጨማሪ ፋይሎች አሉ። ከ «https://am.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ሆራቲዩስ&oldid=342254» የተወሰደ መደቦች: ጸሓፊዎች የሮሜ ሰዎች Navigation menu የኔ መሣርያዎች አልገቡም ውይይት ለዚሁ ቁ. አድራሻ Contributions የብዕር ስም ለማውጣት ለመግባት ክፍለ-ዊኪዎች መጣጥፍ ውይይት Variants ዕይታዎች ለማንበብ አርም ማዘጋጀት ታሪኩን አሳይ More ፍለጋ የማውጫ ቁልፎች ዋና ገጽ የተመደበ ማውጫ በቅርብ ጊዜ የተለወጡ ማናቸውንም ለማየት እርዳታ ምንጭጌ ወቅታዊ ጉዳዮች (ዜና) መዋጮ ለመስጠት ጠቃሚ መሣሪያዎች ወዲህ የሚያያዝ የተዛመዱ ለውጦች ልዩ ገጾች የዕትሙ ቋሚ URL የዚህ ገጽ መረጃ መጥቀሻ ለዚህ መጣጥፍ የውሂብ ንጥል ነገር Print/export Create a book Download as PDF ለማተሚያዎ እንዲስማማ In other projects Wikimedia Commons በሌሎች ቋንቋዎች Afrikaans Aragonés العربية مصرى Asturianu تۆرکجه Башҡортса Žemaitėška Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ Български Brezhoneg Bosanski Català Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Zazaki Ελληνικά English Esperanto Español Eesti Euskara فارسی Suomi Võro Français Furlan Gaeilge Galego עברית हिन्दी Fiji Hindi Hrvatski Magyar Հայերեն Interlingua Bahasa Indonesia Ido Íslenska Italiano 日本語 ქართული Қазақша 한국어 Kurdî Kernowek Latina Lingua Franca Nova Lietuvių Latviešu Malagasy Македонски മലയാളം Монгол मराठी Bahasa Melayu Nāhuatl Nederlands Norsk nynorsk Norsk bokmål Occitan ਪੰਜਾਬੀ Polski Piemontèis Português Română Tarandíne Русский Sardu Sicilianu Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Simple English Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Seeltersk Svenska Kiswahili தமிழ் Tagalog Türkçe Татарча/tatarça Українська Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча Tiếng Việt Volapük Walon Winaray 吴语 中文 粵語 Edit links ይህ ገጽ መጨረሻ የተቀየረው እ.ኣ.አ በ13:30፣ 10 ሴፕቴምበር 2017 ዓ.ም. ነበር። የዚህ መዝገበ ዕውቀት ጽሁፍ በክሪኤቲቭ ኮመንስ ፈቃድ (Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License) ስር ነው የተለቀቀው፣ ተጨማሪ ደንቦች ሊኖሩ ይችላሉ። ለበለጠ መረጃ የአጠቃቀም ደንቦችን ይዩ። የግልነት ድንጋጌ ስለ ውክፐድያ መርሃግብር የኃላፊነት ማስታወቂያ የሞባይል ዕይታ ለገንቢዎች Statistics Cookie statement an-wikipedia-org-3670 ---- Horacio - Biquipedia, a enciclopedia libre Horacio De Biquipedia Ir a la navegación Ir a la búsqueda Horacio Horacio Información personal Calendata de naixencia 8 d'aviento de 65 aC Puesto de naixencia Venosa (Imperio Román) Calendata de muerte 27 de noviembre de 8 aC Puesto de muerte Roma (Imperio Román) Ocupación Escritor y poeta Horacio (Quintus Horatius Flaccus en latín), naixito de Venosa (Imperio Román) o 8 d'aviento de 65 aC y muerto en Roma o 27 de noviembre de 8 aC, estió un escritor y poeta román en luenga latina. Horacio vivió en o periodo de transformación d'o paso dende l'Antiga Roma republicana enta o Imperio Román, en vida de Chulio César y Augusto. Vinclos externos[editar | editar código] Se veigan as imáchens de Commons sobre Horacio. Obtenito de "https://an.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Horacio&oldid=1503786" Categorías: Escritors de Roma Antiga Poetas latinos Escritors en latín 65 aC (naixencias) 8 aC (muertes) Menú de navegación Ferramientas personals No ha dentrato en o sistema Pachina de descusión d'ista IP Contribuciones Creyar cuenta Dentrar-ie Espacios de nombres Pachina Discusión Variants Visualizacions Leyer Editar Editar código Amostrar l'historial Más Mirar Navego Portalada A tabierna Actualidat Zaguers cambeos Una pachina a l'azar Aduya Donativos Ferramientas Pachinas que enlazan con ista Cambios relacionatos Cargar fichero Pachinas especials Vinclo permanent Información d'a pachina Citar ista pachina Elemento de Wikidata Imprentar/exportar Creyar un libro Descargar como PDF Versión ta imprentar En otros proyectos Wikimedia Commons En atras luengas Afrikaans አማርኛ العربية مصرى Asturianu تۆرکجه Башҡортса Žemaitėška Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ Български Brezhoneg Bosanski Català Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Zazaki Ελληνικά English Esperanto Español Eesti Euskara فارسی Suomi Võro Français Furlan Gaeilge Galego עברית हिन्दी Fiji Hindi Hrvatski Magyar Հայերեն Interlingua Bahasa Indonesia Ido Íslenska Italiano 日本語 ქართული Қазақша 한국어 Kurdî Kernowek Latina Lingua Franca Nova Lietuvių Latviešu Malagasy Македонски മലയാളം Монгол मराठी Bahasa Melayu Nāhuatl Nederlands Norsk nynorsk Norsk bokmål Occitan ਪੰਜਾਬੀ Polski Piemontèis Português Română Tarandíne Русский Sardu Sicilianu Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Simple English Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Seeltersk Svenska Kiswahili தமிழ் Tagalog Türkçe Татарча/tatarça Українська Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча Tiếng Việt Volapük Walon Winaray 吴语 中文 粵語 Editar enlaces Zaguera edición d'ista pachina o 11 mar 2013 a las 07:46. O texto ye disponible baixo a Licencia Creative Commons Atribución/Compartir-Igual; talment sigan d'aplicación clausulas adicionals. Mire-se os termins d'uso ta conoixer más detalles. Politica de privacidat Sobre Biquipedia Alvertencias chenerals Versión ta mobils Desarrolladores Estadísticas Declaración de cookies archive-org-4456 ---- Horace : a portrait : Noyes, Alfred, 1880-1958 : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive Skip to main content See what's new with book lending at the Internet Archive Can You Chip In? In 2020 the Internet Archive has seen unprecedented use—and we need your help. When the COVID-19 pandemic hit, our bandwidth demand skyrocketed. Right now we’re getting over 1.5 million daily unique visitors and storing more than 70 petabytes of data. We build and maintain all our own systems, but we don’t charge for access, sell user information, or run ads. Instead, we rely on individual generosity to fund our infrastructure; we're powered by donations averaging $32. Unfortunately, fewer than 1 in 1000 of our patrons donate. We don't ask often, but right now, we have a 2-to-1 Matching Gift Campaign, tripling the impact of every donation. If each of our users gave just $5, we could end this fundraiser today—so if you find all these bits and bytes useful, please pitch in. We know it's been a difficult year, and we understand if you can't afford to contribute. But if you can afford to lend a hand, I promise it will be money well spent. Thank you for your support. —Brewster Kahle, Founder, Internet Archive Continue Maybe later Send me an email reminder Email address (required) Please enter a valid email address. First name Last name Submit By submitting, you agree to receive donor-related emails from the Internet Archive. Your privacy is important to us. We do not sell or trade your information with anyone. A line drawing of the Internet Archive headquarters building façade. An illustration of a magnifying glass. An illustration of a magnifying glass. An illustration of a horizontal line over an up pointing arrow. Upload An illustration of a person's head and chest. Sign up | Log in An illustration of a computer application window Wayback Machine An illustration of an open book. Books An illustration of two cells of a film strip. Video An illustration of an audio speaker. Audio An illustration of a 3.5" floppy disk. Software An illustration of two photographs. Images An illustration of a heart shape Donate An illustration of text ellipses. More An icon used to represent a menu that can be toggled by interacting with this icon. About Blog Projects Help Donate An illustration of a heart shape Contact Jobs Volunteer People Search Metadata Search text contents Search TV news captions Search archived websites Advanced Search Sign up for free Log in Horace : a portrait Item Preview remove-circle Share or Embed This Item EMBED EMBED (for wordpress.com hosted blogs and archive.org item tags) [archiveorg horaceportrait0000noye width=560 height=384 frameborder=0 webkitallowfullscreen=true mozallowfullscreen=true] Want more? Advanced embedding details, examples, and help! No_Favorite share flag Flag this item for Graphic Violence Graphic Sexual Content texts Horace : a portrait by Noyes, Alfred, 1880-1958 Publication date 1947 Topics Horace -- Criticism and interpretation, Laudatory poetry, Latin -- History and criticism, Epistolary poetry, Latin -- History and criticism, Verse satire, Latin -- History and criticism, Rome -- In literature Publisher New York : Sheed & Ward Collection inlibrary; printdisabled; oliverwendellholmeslibrary; phillipsacademy; americana Digitizing sponsor Kahle/Austin Foundation Contributor Phillips Academy, Oliver Wendell Holmes Library Language English xiii, 292 p. ; 22 cm London ed. (Sheed & Ward) has title: Portrait of Horace Access-restricted-item true Addeddate 2019-10-08 04:12:44 Boxid IA1671003 Camera Sony Alpha-A6300 (Control) Collection_set phillipsacademy External-identifier urn:oclc:record:609201527 Foldoutcount 0 Identifier horaceportrait0000noye Identifier-ark ark:/13960/t4wj0j891 Invoice 11 Lccn 47005233 Ocr ABBYY FineReader 11.0 (Extended OCR) Old_pallet IA16710 Openlibrary_edition OL6513173M Openlibrary_work OL4794294W Pages 322 Ppi 300 Republisher_date 20191014100211 Republisher_operator associate-mavanessa-cando@archive.org Republisher_time 425 Scandate 20191008051229 Scanner station03.cebu.archive.org Scanningcenter cebu Scribe3_search_catalog phillips Scribe3_search_id 31867000730296 Tts_version 3.1-initial-268-ge641e8b Show More Show Less Full catalog record MARCXML plus-circle Add Review comment Reviews There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write a review. 24 Previews 1 Favorite DOWNLOAD OPTIONS download 1 file ENCRYPTED DAISY download For print-disabled users 14 day loan required to access EPUB and PDF files. IN COLLECTIONS Books to Borrow Books for People with Print Disabilities Oliver Wendell Holmes Library Phillips Academy American Libraries Uploaded by station03.cebu on October 8, 2019 SIMILAR ITEMS (based on metadata) Terms of Service (last updated 12/31/2014) archive-org-5197 ---- Selected prose : Arnold, Matthew, 1822-1888 : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive Skip to main content See what's new with book lending at the Internet Archive Can You Chip In? In 2020 the Internet Archive has seen unprecedented use—and we need your help. When the COVID-19 pandemic hit, our bandwidth demand skyrocketed. Right now we’re getting over 1.5 million daily unique visitors and storing more than 70 petabytes of data. We build and maintain all our own systems, but we don’t charge for access, sell user information, or run ads. Instead, we rely on individual generosity to fund our infrastructure; we're powered by donations averaging $32. Unfortunately, fewer than 1 in 1000 of our patrons donate. We don't ask often, but right now, we have a 2-to-1 Matching Gift Campaign, tripling the impact of every donation. If each of our users gave just $5, we could end this fundraiser today—so if you find all these bits and bytes useful, please pitch in. We know it's been a difficult year, and we understand if you can't afford to contribute. But if you can afford to lend a hand, I promise it will be money well spent. Thank you for your support. —Brewster Kahle, Founder, Internet Archive Continue Maybe later Send me an email reminder Email address (required) Please enter a valid email address. First name Last name Submit By submitting, you agree to receive donor-related emails from the Internet Archive. Your privacy is important to us. We do not sell or trade your information with anyone. A line drawing of the Internet Archive headquarters building façade. An illustration of a magnifying glass. An illustration of a magnifying glass. An illustration of a horizontal line over an up pointing arrow. Upload An illustration of a person's head and chest. Sign up | Log in An illustration of a computer application window Wayback Machine An illustration of an open book. Books An illustration of two cells of a film strip. Video An illustration of an audio speaker. Audio An illustration of a 3.5" floppy disk. Software An illustration of two photographs. Images An illustration of a heart shape Donate An illustration of text ellipses. More An icon used to represent a menu that can be toggled by interacting with this icon. About Blog Projects Help Donate An illustration of a heart shape Contact Jobs Volunteer People Search Metadata Search text contents Search TV news captions Search archived websites Advanced Search Sign up for free Log in Selected prose Item Preview remove-circle Share or Embed This Item EMBED EMBED (for wordpress.com hosted blogs and archive.org item tags) [archiveorg selectedprose00arno width=560 height=384 frameborder=0 webkitallowfullscreen=true mozallowfullscreen=true] Want more? Advanced embedding details, examples, and help! No_Favorite share flag Flag this item for Graphic Violence Graphic Sexual Content texts Selected prose by Arnold, Matthew, 1822-1888; Keating, P. J., ed Publication date 1970 Publisher [Harmondsworth, Eng.] Penguin Books Collection inlibrary; printdisabled; internetarchivebooks; china Digitizing sponsor Internet Archive Contributor Internet Archive Language English Bibliography: p. [37] Access-restricted-item true Addeddate 2011-11-03 20:13:09 Boxid IA173801 Camera Canon EOS 5D Mark II City [Harmondsworth, Eng.] Donor friendsofthesanfranciscopubliclibrary Edition Repr. External-identifier urn:oclc:record:1036917576 Extramarc OhioLINK Library Catalog Foldoutcount 0 Identifier selectedprose00arno Identifier-ark ark:/13960/t27958470 Isbn 9780140430585 014043058X Lccn 76026048 Ocr ABBYY FineReader 8.0 Openlibrary OL4893142M Openlibrary_edition OL7354688M Openlibrary_work OL16500816W Page-progression lr Pages 486 Ppi 514 Republisher_date 20120321054750 Republisher_operator scanner-shenzhen-david@archive.org;scanner-shenzhen-leo@archive.org Scandate 20120317104534 Scanner scribe20.shenzhen.archive.org Scanningcenter shenzhen Worldcat (source edition) 150451 Show More Show Less Full catalog record MARCXML plus-circle Add Review comment Reviews There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write a review. 51 Previews 2 Favorites Purchase options Better World Books DOWNLOAD OPTIONS download 1 file ENCRYPTED DAISY download For print-disabled users 14 day loan required to access EPUB and PDF files. IN COLLECTIONS Books to Borrow Books for People with Print Disabilities Internet Archive Books Scanned in China Uploaded by lotu.t on November 3, 2011 SIMILAR ITEMS (based on metadata) Terms of Service (last updated 12/31/2014) archive-org-5218 ---- Artifices of eternity : Horace's fourth book of Odes : Putnam, Michael C. J : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive Skip to main content See what's new with book lending at the Internet Archive Can You Chip In? In 2020 the Internet Archive has seen unprecedented use—and we need your help. When the COVID-19 pandemic hit, our bandwidth demand skyrocketed. Right now we’re getting over 1.5 million daily unique visitors and storing more than 70 petabytes of data. We build and maintain all our own systems, but we don’t charge for access, sell user information, or run ads. Instead, we rely on individual generosity to fund our infrastructure; we're powered by donations averaging $32. Unfortunately, fewer than 1 in 1000 of our patrons donate. We don't ask often, but right now, we have a 2-to-1 Matching Gift Campaign, tripling the impact of every donation. If each of our users gave just $5, we could end this fundraiser today—so if you find all these bits and bytes useful, please pitch in. We know it's been a difficult year, and we understand if you can't afford to contribute. But if you can afford to lend a hand, I promise it will be money well spent. Thank you for your support. —Brewster Kahle, Founder, Internet Archive Continue Maybe later Send me an email reminder Email address (required) Please enter a valid email address. First name Last name Submit By submitting, you agree to receive donor-related emails from the Internet Archive. Your privacy is important to us. We do not sell or trade your information with anyone. A line drawing of the Internet Archive headquarters building façade. An illustration of a magnifying glass. An illustration of a magnifying glass. An illustration of a horizontal line over an up pointing arrow. Upload An illustration of a person's head and chest. Sign up | Log in An illustration of a computer application window Wayback Machine An illustration of an open book. Books An illustration of two cells of a film strip. Video An illustration of an audio speaker. Audio An illustration of a 3.5" floppy disk. Software An illustration of two photographs. Images An illustration of a heart shape Donate An illustration of text ellipses. More An icon used to represent a menu that can be toggled by interacting with this icon. About Blog Projects Help Donate An illustration of a heart shape Contact Jobs Volunteer People Search Metadata Search text contents Search TV news captions Search archived websites Advanced Search Sign up for free Log in Artifices of eternity : Horace's fourth book of Odes Item Preview remove-circle Share or Embed This Item EMBED EMBED (for wordpress.com hosted blogs and archive.org item tags) [archiveorg artificesofetern00putn width=560 height=384 frameborder=0 webkitallowfullscreen=true mozallowfullscreen=true] Want more? Advanced embedding details, examples, and help! No_Favorite share flag Flag this item for Graphic Violence Graphic Sexual Content texts Artifices of eternity : Horace's fourth book of Odes by Putnam, Michael C. J Publication date 1986 Topics Horace. Carmina. Liber IV, Odes -- History and criticism Publisher Ithaca : Cornell University Press Collection inlibrary; printdisabled; cornelluniversitypress; americana Digitizing sponsor The Arcadia Fund Contributor Cornell University Press Language English 352 p. -- Includes index Bibliography: p. 341-348 commitment to retain 20151208 Access-restricted-item true Addeddate 2019-01-24 21:03:19 Bookplateleaf 0010 Camera Sony Alpha-A6300 (Control) External-identifier urn:oclc:record:1148022179 Foldoutcount 0 Identifier artificesofetern00putn Identifier-ark ark:/13960/t4tj60j66 Invoice 1605 Isbn 0801418526 Lccn 85025542 Neverindex TRUE Ocr ABBYY FineReader 11.0 (Extended OCR) Openlibrary_edition OL2543792M Openlibrary_work OL2736123W Page-progression lr Pages 362 Ppi 300 Republisher_date 20190130111121 Republisher_operator associate-amy-alexander@archive.org Republisher_time 343 Scandate 20190128191019 Scanner scribe1.toronto.archive.org Scanningcenter uoft Tts_version 1.63-final-2-gf73c3fa Show More Show Less Full catalog record MARCXML plus-circle Add Review comment Reviews There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write a review. 40 Previews Purchase options Better World Books DOWNLOAD OPTIONS download 1 file ENCRYPTED DAISY download For print-disabled users 14 day loan required to access EPUB and PDF files. IN COLLECTIONS Books to Borrow Books for People with Print Disabilities Cornell University Press American Libraries Uploaded by LexW on January 24, 2019 SIMILAR ITEMS (based on metadata) Terms of Service (last updated 12/31/2014) archive-org-6534 ---- Unity and design in Horace's Odes : Santirocco, Matthew S., 1950- : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive Skip to main content See what's new with book lending at the Internet Archive Can You Chip In? In 2020 the Internet Archive has seen unprecedented use—and we need your help. When the COVID-19 pandemic hit, our bandwidth demand skyrocketed. Right now we’re getting over 1.5 million daily unique visitors and storing more than 70 petabytes of data. We build and maintain all our own systems, but we don’t charge for access, sell user information, or run ads. Instead, we rely on individual generosity to fund our infrastructure; we're powered by donations averaging $32. Unfortunately, fewer than 1 in 1000 of our patrons donate. We don't ask often, but right now, we have a 2-to-1 Matching Gift Campaign, tripling the impact of every donation. If each of our users gave just $5, we could end this fundraiser today—so if you find all these bits and bytes useful, please pitch in. We know it's been a difficult year, and we understand if you can't afford to contribute. But if you can afford to lend a hand, I promise it will be money well spent. Thank you for your support. —Brewster Kahle, Founder, Internet Archive Continue Maybe later Send me an email reminder Email address (required) Please enter a valid email address. First name Last name Submit By submitting, you agree to receive donor-related emails from the Internet Archive. Your privacy is important to us. We do not sell or trade your information with anyone. A line drawing of the Internet Archive headquarters building façade. An illustration of a magnifying glass. An illustration of a magnifying glass. An illustration of a horizontal line over an up pointing arrow. Upload An illustration of a person's head and chest. Sign up | Log in An illustration of a computer application window Wayback Machine An illustration of an open book. Books An illustration of two cells of a film strip. Video An illustration of an audio speaker. Audio An illustration of a 3.5" floppy disk. Software An illustration of two photographs. Images An illustration of a heart shape Donate An illustration of text ellipses. More An icon used to represent a menu that can be toggled by interacting with this icon. About Blog Projects Help Donate An illustration of a heart shape Contact Jobs Volunteer People Search Metadata Search text contents Search TV news captions Search archived websites Advanced Search Sign up for free Log in Unity and design in Horace's Odes Item Preview remove-circle Share or Embed This Item EMBED EMBED (for wordpress.com hosted blogs and archive.org item tags) [archiveorg unitydesigninhor00sant width=560 height=384 frameborder=0 webkitallowfullscreen=true mozallowfullscreen=true] Want more? Advanced embedding details, examples, and help! No_Favorite share flag Flag this item for Graphic Violence Graphic Sexual Content texts Unity and design in Horace's Odes by Santirocco, Matthew S., 1950- Publication date 1986 Topics Horace, Laudatory poetry, Latin, Odes, Latin, Rhetoric, Ancient Publisher Chapel Hill : University of North Carolina Press Collection inlibrary; printdisabled; internetarchivebooks; china Digitizing sponsor Kahle/Austin Foundation Contributor Internet Archive Language English Bibliography: p. [215]-233 Includes indexes Access-restricted-item true Addeddate 2014-02-27 18:03:11.103279 Bookplateleaf 0006 Boxid IA1113701 Boxid_2 CH1154213 City Chapel Hill Donor bostonpubliclibrary External-identifier urn:oclc:record:1036886117 Extramarc Brown University Library Foldoutcount 0 Identifier unitydesigninhor00sant Identifier-ark ark:/13960/t4pk4j14g Invoice 1213 Isbn 0807816914 9780807816912 Lccn 85020964 Ocr ABBYY FineReader 11.0 Openlibrary OL2539946M Openlibrary_edition OL2539946M Openlibrary_work OL5104397W Page-progression lr Pages 274 Ppi 300 Republisher_date 20170717142058 Republisher_operator republisher5.shenzhen@archive.org Republisher_time 430 Scandate 20170716063825 Scanner ttscribe15.hongkong.archive.org Scanningcenter hongkong Top_six true Worldcat (source edition) 12693723 Show More Show Less Full catalog record MARCXML plus-circle Add Review comment Reviews There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write a review. 78 Previews 6 Favorites DOWNLOAD OPTIONS download 1 file ENCRYPTED DAISY download For print-disabled users 14 day loan required to access EPUB and PDF files. IN COLLECTIONS Books to Borrow Books for People with Print Disabilities Internet Archive Books Scanned in China Uploaded by Lotu Tii on February 27, 2014 SIMILAR ITEMS (based on metadata) Terms of Service (last updated 12/31/2014) archive-org-6090 ---- Internet Archive Search: ((subject:"Horace" OR creator:"Horace" OR description:"Horace" OR title:"Horace") OR ("65-8" AND Horace)) AND (-mediatype:software) Skip to main content See what's new with book lending at the Internet Archive Can You Chip In? In 2020 the Internet Archive has seen unprecedented use—and we need your help. When the COVID-19 pandemic hit, our bandwidth demand skyrocketed. Right now we’re getting over 1.5 million daily unique visitors and storing more than 70 petabytes of data. We build and maintain all our own systems, but we don’t charge for access, sell user information, or run ads. Instead, we rely on individual generosity to fund our infrastructure; we're powered by donations averaging $32. Unfortunately, fewer than 1 in 1000 of our patrons donate. We don't ask often, but right now, we have a 2-to-1 Matching Gift Campaign, tripling the impact of every donation. If each of our users gave just $5, we could end this fundraiser today—so if you find all these bits and bytes useful, please pitch in. We know it's been a difficult year, and we understand if you can't afford to contribute. But if you can afford to lend a hand, I promise it will be money well spent. Thank you for your support. —Brewster Kahle, Founder, Internet Archive Continue Maybe later Send me an email reminder Email address (required) Please enter a valid email address. First name Last name Submit By submitting, you agree to receive donor-related emails from the Internet Archive. Your privacy is important to us. We do not sell or trade your information with anyone. A line drawing of the Internet Archive headquarters building façade. An illustration of a magnifying glass. An illustration of a magnifying glass. An illustration of a horizontal line over an up pointing arrow. Upload An illustration of a person's head and chest. Sign up | Log in An illustration of a computer application window Wayback Machine An illustration of an open book. Books An illustration of two cells of a film strip. Video An illustration of an audio speaker. Audio An illustration of a 3.5" floppy disk. Software An illustration of two photographs. Images An illustration of a heart shape Donate An illustration of text ellipses. More An icon used to represent a menu that can be toggled by interacting with this icon. About Blog Projects Help Donate An illustration of a heart shape Contact Jobs Volunteer People Search Metadata Search text contents Search TV news captions Search archived websites Advanced Search Sign up for free Log in Search search Search metadata Search text contents Search TV news captions Search radio transcripts Search archived web sites Advanced Search GO share Share No_Favorite Favorite From Wikipedia: Horace Quintus Horatius Flaccus, known in the English-speaking world as Horace, was the leading Roman lyric poet during the time of Augustus. The rhetorician Quintilian regarded his Odes as just about the only Latin lyrics worth reading: "He can be lofty sometimes, yet he is also full of charm and grace, versatile in his figures, and felicitously daring in his choice of words.".. Read More Born Quintus Horatius Flaccus 8 December 65 BC Venusia, Italy, Roman Republic Died 27 November 8 BC (age 56) Rome Occupation Soldier, scriba quaestorius, poet, senator Language Latin Nationality Roman Filters 19,135 RESULTS Media TypeMedia Type YearYear Topics & SubjectsTopics & Subjects CollectionCollection CreatorCreator LanguageLanguage SHOW DETAILS up-solid down-solid RELEVANCE VIEWS TITLE DATE ARCHIVED DATE PUBLISHED DATE REVIEWED DATE ADDED CREATOR SORT BY RELEVANCE VIEWS TITLE DATE ARCHIVED DATE PUBLISHED DATE REVIEWED DATE ADDED CREATOR eye Title Date Archived Creator Project Gutenberg 633 633 The Works of Horace Dec 7, 2006 12/06 by Horace, 65 BC-8 BC texts eye 633 favorite 0 comment 0 Book from Project Gutenberg: The Works of Horace Project Gutenberg 746 746 The Odes and Carmen Saeculare of Horace Jun 22, 2015 06/15 by Horace, 65 BC-8 BC texts eye 746 favorite 0 comment 0 Book from Project Gutenberg: The Odes and Carmen Saeculare of Horace Library of Congress Classification: PA American Libraries 146 146 Horace in New York Mar 27, 2008 03/08 by Isaac Starr] [Clason texts eye 146 favorite 0 comment 0 Book digitized by Google from the library of the New York Public Library and uploaded to the Internet Archive by user tpb. Source: http://books.google.com/books?id=6RETAAAAIAAJ&oe=UTF-8 Project Gutenberg 494 494 The Satires, Epistles, and Art of Poetry May 1, 2016 05/16 by Horace, 65 BC-8 BC texts eye 494 favorite 0 comment 0 Book from Project Gutenberg: The Satires, Epistles, and Art of Poetry Library of Congress Classification: PA Project Gutenberg 2,006 2.0K The Art of Poetry an Epistle to the Pisos: Q. Horatii Flacci Epistola Ad Pisones, De Arte Poetica. Jun 15, 2015 06/15 by Horace, 65 BC-8 BC texts eye 2,006 favorite 1 comment 0 Book from Project Gutenberg: The Art of Poetry an Epistle to the Pisos: Q. Horatii Flacci Epistola Ad Pisones, De Arte Poetica. Project Gutenberg 1,079 1.1K Odes and Epodes Apr 2, 2016 04/16 by Horace, 65 BC-8 BC texts eye 1,079 favorite 1 comment 0 Book from Project Gutenberg: Odes and Epodes Picfixer Feature Film Collection 5,938 5.9K HORACE TAKES OVER a.k.a. One Thrilling Night. Dec 12, 2013 12/13 by W A Hackel movies eye 5,938 favorite 8 comment 1 This 790 MB file has the same video and audio qualities as the 3.8 GB file found elsewhere at IA. A screwball comedy of errors in which newlyweds' first night is constantly interrupted by a wandering corpse, dumb crooks and frustrated cops. It received the best press reviews of any Monogram release. Stars John Beal and Wanda McKay, supported by Warren Hymer, J Farrel MacDonald and Tom Neal. Directed by William Baudine Released in 1942 Complete print IMDB page:... favoritefavoritefavoritefavoritefavorite ( 1 reviews ) Topics: screwball comedies, comedies, wedding night, John Beal, Wanda McKay Cleveland Museum of Art 19 19 Self-Portrait in Rome Jan 15, 2019 01/19 by Horace Vernet (French, 1789-1863) image eye 19 favorite 0 comment 0 Self-Portrait in Rome, 1832. Horace Vernet (French, 1789-1863). Oil on fabric; framed: 78.5 x 67 x 8 cm (30 7/8 x 26 3/8 x 3 1/8 in.); unframed: 65 x 54.2 cm (25 9/16 x 21 5/16 in.). The Cleveland Museum of Art, Mr. and Mrs. William H. Marlatt Fund 1977.171 Topic: Modern European Painting and Sculpture The Lincoln Financial Foundation Collection 176 176 New-York weekly tribune May 16, 2013 05/13 by Greeley, Horace, 1811-1872 texts eye 176 favorite 0 comment 0 "Weekly" sometimes appears within title ornament Topic: Lincoln, Abraham, 1809-1865 Source: folio Audiophile CD Collection 15 15 Alkan: Concerto For Solo Piano - Troisième recueil de chants Jan 13, 2020 01/20 by Charles-Valentin Alkan; Marc-André Hamelin audio eye 15 favorite 0 comment 0 Tracklist: 1. Concerto for Solo Piano, op. 39 no. 8: Allegro assai 2. Concerto for Solo Piano, op. 39 no. 9: Adagio 3. Concerto for Solo Piano, op. 39 no. 10: Allegretto alla barbaresca 4. Troisième recueil de chants, op. 65: Vivante 5. Troisième recueil de chants, op. 65: Esprits follets: Prestissimo 6. Troisième recueil de chants, op. 65: Canon: Assez vimement 7. Troisième recueil de chants, op. 65: Tempo giusto 8. Troisième recueil de chants, op. 65: Horace et Lydie: Vivacissimo 9.... Source: CD American Libraries 500 500 Scientific management; a history and criticism Sep 21, 2008 09/08 by Drury, Horace B. (Horace Bookwalter), b. 1888 texts eye 500 favorite 0 comment 0 Book digitized by Google from the library of the University of California and uploaded to the Internet Archive by user tpb. Topics: Industrial efficiency, Factory management, Industrial management Source: http://books.google.com/books?id=BvFCAAAAIAAJ&oe=UTF-8 Cornell University Library 447 447 Scientific management; a history and criticism Oct 19, 2009 10/09 by Drury, Horace Bookwalter, 1888- texts eye 447 favorite 1 comment 0 The metadata below describe the original scanning. Follow the "All Files: HTTP" link in the "View the book" box to the left to find XML files that contain more metadata about the original images and the derived formats (OCR results, PDF etc.). See also the What is the directory structure for the texts? FAQ for information about file content and naming conventions. Topics: Industrial efficiency, Factory management American Libraries 288 288 Eulogy on John Marshall ... Mar 2, 2009 03/09 by Horace Binney texts eye 288 favorite 0 comment 0 Book digitized by Google from the library of the University of Michigan and uploaded to the Internet Archive by user tpb. Source: http://books.google.com/books?id=gHEsAAAAMAAJ&oe=UTF-8 Arxiv.org 36 36 Variable Stars in Large Magellanic Cloud Globular Clusters II: NGC 1786 Sep 22, 2013 09/13 by Charles A. Kuehn; Horace A. Smith; Marcio Catelan; Barton J. Pritzl; Nathan De Lee; Jura Borissova texts eye 36 favorite 0 comment 0 This is the second in a series of papers studying the variable stars in Large Magellanic Cloud globular clusters. The primary goal of this series is to study how RR Lyrae stars in Oosterhoff-intermediate systems compare to their counterparts in Oosterhoff I/II systems. In this paper, we present the results of our new time-series BV photometeric study of the globular cluster NGC 1786. A total of 65 variable stars were identified in our field of view. These variables include 53 RR Lyraes (27... Source: http://arxiv.org/abs/1210.5815v1 JSTOR Early Journal Content, The American Political Science Review 100 100 Workmen's Compensation Mar 18, 2013 03/13 by Flack, Horace E. texts eye 100 favorite 0 comment 0 "Workmen's Compensation" is an article from The American Political Science Review, Volume 8 . View more articles from The American Political Science Review . View this article on JSTOR . View this article's JSTOR metadata . You may also retrieve all of this items metadata in JSON at the following URL: https://archive.org/metadata/jstor-1945391 Source: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/1945391 American Libraries 826 826 The American Conflict: A History of the Great Rebellion in the United States ... Jul 7, 2008 07/08 by Horace Greeley texts eye 826 favorite 0 comment 0 Book digitized by Google from the library of Harvard University and uploaded to the Internet Archive by user tpb. Topics: erm, enemy, army, bebel, force, corps, fort, rebel, loss, total loss, three miles, pushed forward,... Source: http://books.google.com/books?id=rVEMAAAAYAAJ&oe=UTF-8 Books to Borrow 2 2.0 Makers of Europe : being the James Henry Morgan lectures in Dickinson college for 1930 Jan 21, 2020 01/20 by Conway, Robert Seymour, 1864-1933 texts eye 2 favorite 0 comment 0 89 pages ; 24 cm Topics: Caesar, Julius, Cicero, Marcus Tullius, Horace -- Political and social views, Virgil -- Political... American Libraries 893 893 The American Conflict: Its Causes, Incidents, and Results: Intended to Exhibit Expecially Its ... Feb 20, 2009 02/09 by Horace Greeley texts eye 893 favorite 0 comment 0 Book digitized by Google from the library of the University of Michigan and uploaded to the Internet Archive by user tpb. Topics: tlie, rebel, stsd, enemy, army, corps, force, fort, total loss, three miles, rebel force, rebel... Source: http://books.google.com/books?id=jTSNPCYZbFcC&oe=UTF-8 American Libraries 656 656 The American Conflict: A History of the Great Rebellion in the United States of America, 1860 ... Jul 7, 2008 07/08 by Horace Greeley texts eye 656 favorite 0 comment 0 Book digitized by Google from the library of the University of Michigan and uploaded to the Internet Archive by user tpb. Topics: tlie, slavery, slave, tion, united, federal, convention, going, south carolina, supreme court, fort... Source: http://books.google.com/books?id=_3_S5phvNv0C&oe=UTF-8 Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory Technical Reports 15 15 Sound speeds and temperatures of Bermuda waters in autumn and winter : October 1964-March 1966 Feb 4, 2020 02/20 by Piip, Ants T., author texts eye 15 favorite 0 comment 0 19, v leaves, 73 unnumbered leaves of plates (some folded) : 28 cm Topics: Sir Horace Lamb (Ship). Cruise (1964), Sir Horace Lamb (Ship). Cruise (1965), Sir Horace Lamb... The LibriVox Free Audiobook Collection 9,452 9.5K Briefe (Epistulae) Nov 18, 2009 11/09 by Horatius Flaccus, Quintus (Horaz) audio eye 9,452 favorite 0 comment 0 LibriVox recording of Briefe (Epistulae), by Quintus Horatius Flaccus (Horaz). Read by redaer. Briefe (Epistulae) von Horaz (65 - 8 v. Chr.) Übersetzt von Johann Heinrich Voß (1751-1826), Veröffentlichung dieser Ausgabe 1893 Horaz, eigentlich Quintus Horatius Flaccus, ist neben Vergil einer der bedeutendsten römischen Dichter der „Augusteischen Zeit. Da die Oden nicht den erhofften Erfolg brachten, ließ Horaz ab 20 v. Chr. von der Lyrik ab und widmete sich dem ersten Buch der Epistulae... Topics: LibriVox, audio book, Hörbuch, Literature, Literatur, Poetry, Gedichte, German, Deutsch, Briefe,... Source: Librivox recording of a public-domain text Books to Borrow 17 17 Classical and medieval literature criticism. [electronic resource] Aug 12, 2014 08/14 by Krstovic, Jelena O., editor texts eye 17 favorite 0 comment 0 Print version record Topics: English literature, English literature, Literature, Poetry, Ancient, Poetry, Medieval, Drama,... Source: removedNEL American Libraries 185 185 The Cataloguing of Mss. in the Bodleian Library: A Letter Addressed to Members of Congregation May 18, 2008 05/08 by Andrew Clark texts eye 185 favorite 0 comment 0 Book digitized by Google from the library of Harvard University and uploaded to the Internet Archive by user tpb. Source: http://books.google.com/books?id=BVdm_RTEfw8C&oe=UTF-8 American Libraries 489 489 The sacra Idulia in Ovid's Fasti; a study of Ovid's credibility in regard to the place and the victim of this sacrifice Oct 27, 2008 10/08 by Wright, Horace Wetherill, 1884- texts eye 489 favorite 0 comment 0 Book digitized by Google from the library of the University of California and uploaded to the Internet Archive by user tpb. Topics: Ovid, 43 B.C.-17 or 18 A.D, Didactic poetry, Latin, Fasts and feasts in literature, Sacrifice in... Source: http://books.google.com/books?id=FPlBAAAAIAAJ&oe=UTF-8 The LibriVox Free Audiobook Collection 6,103 6.1K Epoden und Oden Nov 12, 2009 11/09 by Horatius Flaccus, Quintus (Horaz) audio eye 6,103 favorite 0 comment 0 LibriVox recording of Epoden und Oden, by Quintus Horatius Flaccus (Horaz). Read by redaer. Epoden (Iambi) und Oden (Carmina) von Horaz (65 - 8 v. Chr.) Übersetzt von Johann Heinrich Voß (1751-1826), Veröffentlichung dieser Ausgabe 1893 Horaz, eigentlich Quintus Horatius Flaccus, ist neben Vergil einer der bedeutendsten römischen Dichter der „Augusteischen Zeit. Epoden Als Epoden werden die 17 Gedichte eines schmalen Buches bezeichnet. Epoden deshalb, weil jeweils ein Langvers mit einem... Topics: LibriVox, audio book, Hörbuch, Literature, Literatur, Poetry, Gedichte, German, Deutsch, Epoden... Source: Librivox recording of a public-domain text American Libraries 994 994 The American conflict: a history of great rebellion in the United States of America, 1860-['65] Feb 20, 2009 02/09 by Greeley, Horace, 1811-1872. [from old catalog] texts eye 994 favorite 0 comment 0 Book digitized by Google from the library of the University of Michigan and uploaded to the Internet Archive by user tpb. Topic: Slavery Source: http://books.google.com/books?id=FgttgXDW6SMC&oe=UTF-8 American Libraries 826 826 The American conflict: a history of great rebellion in the United States of America, 1860-['65] Jul 14, 2009 07/09 by Greeley, Horace, 1811-1872. [from old catalog] texts eye 826 favorite 0 comment 0 Book digitized by Google from the library of Harvard University and uploaded to the Internet Archive by user tpb. Topic: Slavery Source: http://books.google.com/books?id=ZlIMAAAAYAAJ&oe=UTF-8 The LibriVox Free Audiobook Collection 12,679 13K Satiren Nov 5, 2009 11/09 by Quintus Horatius Flaccus audio eye 12,679 favorite 0 comment 1 LibriVox recording of Satiren, by Quintus Horatius Flaccus. Translated by Johann Heinrich Voss. Read by redaer. Satiren (Sermones) von Horaz (65 - 8 v. Chr.) Übersetzt von Johann Heinrich Voß (1751-1826), Veröffentlichung dieser Ausgabe 1893 Horaz, eigentlich Quintus Horatius Flaccus, ist neben Vergil einer der bedeutendsten römischen Dichter der „Augusteischen Zeit“, das heißt der Zeit zwischen 43 v. Chr. und 14 n. Chr., also vom Tod Ciceros bis zum Tod des Augustus. Die zwei Bücher... ( 1 reviews ) Topics: LibriVox, audio book, Hörbuch, Literature, Literatur, Poetry, Gedichte, Satire, German, Deutsch,... Source: Librivox recording of a public-domain text American Libraries 160 160 Ready Reference Guide to the Ordinances of the North-West Territories: Including the Revised ... May 10, 2009 05/09 by Harvey, Horace , Charles Coursolles McCaul texts eye 160 favorite 0 comment 0 Book digitized by Google and uploaded to the Internet Archive by user tpb. Source: http://books.google.com/books?id=n2AvAAAAIAAJ&oe=UTF-8 Books to Borrow 113 113 The Norton book of classical literature Feb 20, 2020 02/20 texts eye 113 favorite 7 comment 0 866 pages ; 24 cm Topics: Classical literature -- Translations into English, Classical literature, Littérature antique --... 44 44 Librivox Multilingual Short Works Collection 006 by VARIOUS collection 19 ITEMS 44 VIEWS Jul 9, 2018 07/18 collection eye 44 This is a collection of short pieces, poetry or prose, fiction and non-fiction, in several different languages. All chosen and recorded by Librivox volunteers. Brief description of the contributions: 01 Tagalog - ¡Ang Reyna Elena.....! by Pascual de Leon (1893-1958) [1915] - Key words: poetry, The Queen Elena 02 Polish - Pieśń o mowie naszej by Tadeusz Boy-Żeleński (1874-1941) [1913] - Key words: poetry, poezja, język, pruderia 03 Japanese - Tebukuro wo kaini by Niimi Nankichi (1913-1943)... Topics: podcasts, Librivox Multilingual Short Works Collection 006 by VARIOUS The LibriVox Free Audiobook Collection 11,549 12K Librivox Multilingual Short Works Collection 006 Mar 4, 2013 03/13 by Various audio eye 11,549 favorite 4 comment 0 This is a collection of short pieces, poetry or prose, fiction and non-fiction, in several different languages. All chosen and recorded by Librivox volunteers. Brief description of the contributions: 01 Tagalog - ¡Ang Reyna Elena.....! by Pascual de Leon (1893-1958) [1915] - Key words: poetry, The Queen Elena 02 Polish - Pieśń o mowie naszej by Tadeusz Boy-Żeleński (1874-1941) [1913] - Key words: poetry, poezja, język, pruderia 03 Japanese - Tebukuro wo kaini by Niimi Nankichi (1913-1943)... Topics: Librivox, audiobook, multilingual, poetry, prose Source: Librivox recording of a public-domain text Perkins School for the Blind Archives 108 108 Perkins School for the Blind Correspondence, Volume 21, Received 1873-1874 Dec 1, 2015 12/15 by See index in description field below texts eye 108 favorite 0 comment 0 Andrew, E S: 18 Adams, Edwin G: 19 Atwater, J M & Bro: 55 Aldrich, Clara B: 63, 144 Andrew, C N: 79 Aspinwall, William H: 136 Austin, Charles: 146 Awl, William M: 148 Butler, John N: 11, 15, 22, 24, 36, 168 Brown, Francis H: 22 Babcock, John H: 31, 58, 165 Bursor, D S: 59, 69 Babcock, Stephen: 79 Brown, J B: 84 Bolles, L S: 91, 101, 137, 140 Beers, Nellie: 119 Burnham, Albert W: 136 Buckle, A: 140 Bacon, Samuel: 153 Bureau of Ed, : 159 Brewer, Cyrus: 170 Burnham, Lizzie: 174 Carter, Charles... Podcasts 207 207 REGGAE REVOLUTION RADIO SHOW 6-22-10 Jun 23, 2010 06/10 by Selector Jonathon audio eye 207 favorite 0 comment 0 REGGAE REVOLUTION RADIO SHOW EACH & EVERY TUESDAY NIGHT 10PM - MIDNIGHT (EST) W/ SELECTOR JONATHON 89.1 WIDR FM KALAMAZOO MICHIGAN 6-22-10 LOVERS ROCK JUGGLING http://cluster1.reggaedubwise.com/REGGAE_REVOLUTION_RADIO_SHOW http://dreadisound.com 1 HORACE ANDY - LOVE OF A WOMAN DUB (JAMAICA) 2 DENNIS BROWN - LOVE GOT A HOLD ON ME (JAMAICA) 3 ROBERT FRENCH - MEET ME BY THE RIVER (JAMAICA) 4 TRISTAN PALMER - ENTERTAINMENT (JAMAICA) 5 DENNIS BROWN - COLD HEARTED FOOLS (JAMAICA) 6 GREGORY ISAACS... Topics: REGGAE, DUB, RADIO RESTRICTED-ZONE 3 3.0 Blackclassical-v-Restrictedzone Feb 18, 2020 02/20 by restricted-zone.com audio eye 3 favorite 0 comment 0 Tracklist : 1. Intro – Wesley Snipes from Passenger 57 2. Eugene Wilde – Gotta get you home with me 3. Dennis Edwards – Don’t look any further 4. Cool Notes – Never too young 5. Kleer – Intimate Connection 6. Kleer – Tonight 7. Original Concept – Can you feel it? 8. Doug Fresh – The Show 9. Bad Boys / K LOVE – Bad Boys 10. Marley Marl – Marley Scratch 11. MC Shan – MC Space 12. Mantronix – Get stupid fresh pt 1 13. Mantronix – In Full Effect Megamix 88 14. King Tee... Books to Borrow 165 165 Off the map : tales of endurance and exploration Dec 19, 2012 12/12 by Fleming, Fergus, 1959- texts eye 165 favorite 5 comment 0 Originally published: London : Weidenfeld & Nicholson, 2004 Topics: History - General History, Explorers, Biography/Autobiography, Biography & Autobiography,... Perkins School for the Blind Archives 193 193 Perkins School for the Blind Correspondence, Volume 8, Received 1848-1849 Sep 30, 2013 09/13 by See index in description field below texts eye 193 favorite 0 comment 0 Abbott, S L: 116 Adams, George M: 273 Aerly, Mary: 189 Alden, Elihu: 49, 245, 265 Allen, J D: 87 Allen, Nathan: 73 Allen, Stephen N: 212, 219 Andrews, William T: 129 Armsby, L: 298 Atwood, John: 270 Austin, S: 173 Axtell, J T: 249 Ball, John: 46, 54, 63, 72, 172 Baldwin, J D: 168 Bates, Joseph: 48 Berry, Charles T: 33 Beers, C L: 240 Benson, Cyrus Jr: 263 Berenberg, John: 113 Barnard, Henry: 216 Barnard, James M: 110 Bartol, C A: 11 Bigelow, A: 300 Begelow, Eliza: 93 Blaisdell, Sarah: 147... Perkins School for the Blind Archives 165 165 Perkins School for the Blind Correspondence, Volume 3, Received 1838-1839 Sep 30, 2013 09/13 by See index in description field below texts eye 165 favorite 0 comment 0 Alston, John: 32, 84, 150, 194, 203 Anderson, R.: 137, 205, Appleton, Samuel: 12, 223 Ball, John: 71, 133 Baker, George T.: 165, 208 Bartlett, Thomas S: 145, Bartol, C. A.: 183 Blake, Joseph M.: 147 Bills, Memorandum of, : 123 Booth, Rufus: 201, 207, 217 Bowen, B. B.: 41, 46, 62, 99 Bowen, Benjamim: 65 Brigham, A: 90 Brooks, E: 68 Brown, I I: 176 Bullock, N.: 140 Cahoon, J. B.: 11 Carton, Monsieur: 58 Cheverus, Charles A: 173 Chick, William: 198 Chamberlayne, Lewis W.: 4 Clifford, L. W.: 76... Folkscanomy Religion: Books on Faith, Spirituality and Worship 1,083 1.1K "Saying Grace" historically considered, and numerous forms of Grace taken from ancient and modern sources; with appendices Nov 17, 2014 11/14 by Dixon, Henry Lancelot texts eye 1,083 favorite 2 comment 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS. Part I. Introduction on 'Saying Grace' Custom general as shewn from Pagan, Hebrew and Christian Literature In Pagan Literature evidence from Homer, Hesiod, Plato, Athenoeus, Epictetus, Virgil, Horace and Livy 3 The Ainu of Japan 7 In Hebrew Literature the evidence from the Old Testament and the Apocrypha 8 From the Mishna and other Jewish writings 12 In Christian Literature, the evidence from the New Testament : — (1) From the example of our Lord Himself 14 (2) From the... Topic: Grace At Meals Microfilm 83 83 Compiled military service records of volunteer Union soldiers who served with the United States Colored Troops [microform] : 1st through 5th United States Colored Cavalry, 5th Massachusettts Cavalry (Colored), 6th United States Colored Cavalry Jul 12, 2010 07/10 by United States. National Archives and Records Administration; United States. National Archives and Records Administration texts eye 83 favorite 0 comment 0 1st United States Colored Cavalry. reel 1. Akess, Alexander-Bom, John H. -- reel 2. Bomer, James-Cartwright, John -- reel 3. Casey, Thomas-Davenport, John J. -- reel 4. Davis, Augustus-Floyd, George -- reel 5. Fly, Benjamin-Griffin, Oliver -- reel 6. Griffin, Quinton-Holstead, Peter -- reel 7. Holt, George-Jones, Herbert -- reel 8. Jones, Howell-Macoy, Peter -- reel 9. Madry, Andrew-Mosley, Jacob -- reel 10. Moss, James-Polk, James -- reel 11. Pollard, Sipio-Sales, William -- reel 12. Sample,... Topics: United States. Colored Troops, African American soldiers Microfilm 100 100 Compiled military service records of volunteer Union soldiers who served with the United States Colored Troops [microform] : 1st through 5th United States Colored Cavalry, 5th Massachusettts Cavalry (Colored), 6th United States Colored Cavalry Jul 12, 2010 07/10 by United States. National Archives and Records Administration; United States. National Archives and Records Administration texts eye 100 favorite 0 comment 0 1st United States Colored Cavalry. reel 1. Akess, Alexander-Bom, John H. -- reel 2. Bomer, James-Cartwright, John -- reel 3. Casey, Thomas-Davenport, John J. -- reel 4. Davis, Augustus-Floyd, George -- reel 5. Fly, Benjamin-Griffin, Oliver -- reel 6. Griffin, Quinton-Holstead, Peter -- reel 7. Holt, George-Jones, Herbert -- reel 8. Jones, Howell-Macoy, Peter -- reel 9. Madry, Andrew-Mosley, Jacob -- reel 10. Moss, James-Polk, James -- reel 11. Pollard, Sipio-Sales, William -- reel 12. Sample,... Topics: United States. Colored Troops, African American soldiers Microfilm 82 82 Compiled military service records of volunteer Union soldiers who served with the United States Colored Troops [microform] : 1st through 5th United States Colored Cavalry, 5th Massachusettts Cavalry (Colored), 6th United States Colored Cavalry Jul 12, 2010 07/10 by United States. National Archives and Records Administration; United States. National Archives and Records Administration texts eye 82 favorite 0 comment 0 1st United States Colored Cavalry. reel 1. Akess, Alexander-Bom, John H. -- reel 2. Bomer, James-Cartwright, John -- reel 3. Casey, Thomas-Davenport, John J. -- reel 4. Davis, Augustus-Floyd, George -- reel 5. Fly, Benjamin-Griffin, Oliver -- reel 6. Griffin, Quinton-Holstead, Peter -- reel 7. Holt, George-Jones, Herbert -- reel 8. Jones, Howell-Macoy, Peter -- reel 9. Madry, Andrew-Mosley, Jacob -- reel 10. Moss, James-Polk, James -- reel 11. Pollard, Sipio-Sales, William -- reel 12. Sample,... Topics: United States. Colored Troops, African American soldiers Microfilm 93 93 Compiled military service records of volunteer Union soldiers who served with the United States Colored Troops [microform] : 1st through 5th United States Colored Cavalry, 5th Massachusettts Cavalry (Colored), 6th United States Colored Cavalry Jul 12, 2010 07/10 by United States. National Archives and Records Administration; United States. National Archives and Records Administration texts eye 93 favorite 0 comment 0 1st United States Colored Cavalry. reel 1. Akess, Alexander-Bom, John H. -- reel 2. Bomer, James-Cartwright, John -- reel 3. Casey, Thomas-Davenport, John J. -- reel 4. Davis, Augustus-Floyd, George -- reel 5. Fly, Benjamin-Griffin, Oliver -- reel 6. Griffin, Quinton-Holstead, Peter -- reel 7. Holt, George-Jones, Herbert -- reel 8. Jones, Howell-Macoy, Peter -- reel 9. Madry, Andrew-Mosley, Jacob -- reel 10. Moss, James-Polk, James -- reel 11. Pollard, Sipio-Sales, William -- reel 12. Sample,... Topics: United States. Colored Troops, African American soldiers Microfilm 82 82 Compiled military service records of volunteer Union soldiers who served with the United States Colored Troops [microform] : 1st through 5th United States Colored Cavalry, 5th Massachusettts Cavalry (Colored), 6th United States Colored Cavalry Jul 12, 2010 07/10 by United States. National Archives and Records Administration; United States. National Archives and Records Administration texts eye 82 favorite 0 comment 0 1st United States Colored Cavalry. reel 1. Akess, Alexander-Bom, John H. -- reel 2. Bomer, James-Cartwright, John -- reel 3. Casey, Thomas-Davenport, John J. -- reel 4. Davis, Augustus-Floyd, George -- reel 5. Fly, Benjamin-Griffin, Oliver -- reel 6. Griffin, Quinton-Holstead, Peter -- reel 7. Holt, George-Jones, Herbert -- reel 8. Jones, Howell-Macoy, Peter -- reel 9. Madry, Andrew-Mosley, Jacob -- reel 10. Moss, James-Polk, James -- reel 11. Pollard, Sipio-Sales, William -- reel 12. Sample,... Topics: United States. Colored Troops, African American soldiers Microfilm 95 95 Compiled military service records of volunteer Union soldiers who served with the United States Colored Troops [microform] : 1st through 5th United States Colored Cavalry, 5th Massachusettts Cavalry (Colored), 6th United States Colored Cavalry Jul 12, 2010 07/10 by United States. National Archives and Records Administration; United States. National Archives and Records Administration texts eye 95 favorite 0 comment 0 1st United States Colored Cavalry. reel 1. Akess, Alexander-Bom, John H. -- reel 2. Bomer, James-Cartwright, John -- reel 3. Casey, Thomas-Davenport, John J. -- reel 4. Davis, Augustus-Floyd, George -- reel 5. Fly, Benjamin-Griffin, Oliver -- reel 6. Griffin, Quinton-Holstead, Peter -- reel 7. Holt, George-Jones, Herbert -- reel 8. Jones, Howell-Macoy, Peter -- reel 9. Madry, Andrew-Mosley, Jacob -- reel 10. Moss, James-Polk, James -- reel 11. Pollard, Sipio-Sales, William -- reel 12. Sample,... Topics: United States. Colored Troops, African American soldiers Microfilm 63 63 Compiled military service records of volunteer Union soldiers who served with the United States Colored Troops [microform] : 1st through 5th United States Colored Cavalry, 5th Massachusettts Cavalry (Colored), 6th United States Colored Cavalry Jul 12, 2010 07/10 by United States. National Archives and Records Administration; United States. National Archives and Records Administration texts eye 63 favorite 0 comment 0 1st United States Colored Cavalry. reel 1. Akess, Alexander-Bom, John H. -- reel 2. Bomer, James-Cartwright, John -- reel 3. Casey, Thomas-Davenport, John J. -- reel 4. Davis, Augustus-Floyd, George -- reel 5. Fly, Benjamin-Griffin, Oliver -- reel 6. Griffin, Quinton-Holstead, Peter -- reel 7. Holt, George-Jones, Herbert -- reel 8. Jones, Howell-Macoy, Peter -- reel 9. Madry, Andrew-Mosley, Jacob -- reel 10. Moss, James-Polk, James -- reel 11. Pollard, Sipio-Sales, William -- reel 12. Sample,... Topics: United States. Colored Troops, African American soldiers Microfilm 76 76 Compiled military service records of volunteer Union soldiers who served with the United States Colored Troops [microform] : 1st through 5th United States Colored Cavalry, 5th Massachusettts Cavalry (Colored), 6th United States Colored Cavalry Jul 12, 2010 07/10 by United States. National Archives and Records Administration; United States. National Archives and Records Administration texts eye 76 favorite 0 comment 0 1st United States Colored Cavalry. reel 1. Akess, Alexander-Bom, John H. -- reel 2. Bomer, James-Cartwright, John -- reel 3. Casey, Thomas-Davenport, John J. -- reel 4. Davis, Augustus-Floyd, George -- reel 5. Fly, Benjamin-Griffin, Oliver -- reel 6. Griffin, Quinton-Holstead, Peter -- reel 7. Holt, George-Jones, Herbert -- reel 8. Jones, Howell-Macoy, Peter -- reel 9. Madry, Andrew-Mosley, Jacob -- reel 10. Moss, James-Polk, James -- reel 11. Pollard, Sipio-Sales, William -- reel 12. Sample,... Topics: United States. Colored Troops, African American soldiers Microfilm 101 101 Compiled military service records of volunteer Union soldiers who served with the United States Colored Troops [microform] : 1st through 5th United States Colored Cavalry, 5th Massachusettts Cavalry (Colored), 6th United States Colored Cavalry Jul 12, 2010 07/10 by United States. National Archives and Records Administration; United States. National Archives and Records Administration texts eye 101 favorite 0 comment 0 1st United States Colored Cavalry. reel 1. Akess, Alexander-Bom, John H. -- reel 2. Bomer, James-Cartwright, John -- reel 3. Casey, Thomas-Davenport, John J. -- reel 4. Davis, Augustus-Floyd, George -- reel 5. Fly, Benjamin-Griffin, Oliver -- reel 6. Griffin, Quinton-Holstead, Peter -- reel 7. Holt, George-Jones, Herbert -- reel 8. Jones, Howell-Macoy, Peter -- reel 9. Madry, Andrew-Mosley, Jacob -- reel 10. Moss, James-Polk, James -- reel 11. Pollard, Sipio-Sales, William -- reel 12. Sample,... Topics: United States. Colored Troops, African American soldiers Microfilm 66 66 Compiled military service records of volunteer Union soldiers who served with the United States Colored Troops [microform] : 1st through 5th United States Colored Cavalry, 5th Massachusettts Cavalry (Colored), 6th United States Colored Cavalry Jul 13, 2010 07/10 by United States. National Archives and Records Administration; United States. National Archives and Records Administration texts eye 66 favorite 0 comment 0 1st United States Colored Cavalry. reel 1. Akess, Alexander-Bom, John H. -- reel 2. Bomer, James-Cartwright, John -- reel 3. Casey, Thomas-Davenport, John J. -- reel 4. Davis, Augustus-Floyd, George -- reel 5. Fly, Benjamin-Griffin, Oliver -- reel 6. Griffin, Quinton-Holstead, Peter -- reel 7. Holt, George-Jones, Herbert -- reel 8. Jones, Howell-Macoy, Peter -- reel 9. Madry, Andrew-Mosley, Jacob -- reel 10. Moss, James-Polk, James -- reel 11. Pollard, Sipio-Sales, William -- reel 12. Sample,... Topics: United States. Colored Troops, African American soldiers Microfilm 80 80 Compiled military service records of volunteer Union soldiers who served with the United States Colored Troops [microform] : 1st through 5th United States Colored Cavalry, 5th Massachusettts Cavalry (Colored), 6th United States Colored Cavalry Jul 13, 2010 07/10 by United States. National Archives and Records Administration; United States. National Archives and Records Administration texts eye 80 favorite 0 comment 0 1st United States Colored Cavalry. reel 1. Akess, Alexander-Bom, John H. -- reel 2. Bomer, James-Cartwright, John -- reel 3. Casey, Thomas-Davenport, John J. -- reel 4. Davis, Augustus-Floyd, George -- reel 5. Fly, Benjamin-Griffin, Oliver -- reel 6. Griffin, Quinton-Holstead, Peter -- reel 7. Holt, George-Jones, Herbert -- reel 8. Jones, Howell-Macoy, Peter -- reel 9. Madry, Andrew-Mosley, Jacob -- reel 10. Moss, James-Polk, James -- reel 11. Pollard, Sipio-Sales, William -- reel 12. Sample,... Topics: United States. Colored Troops, African American soldiers MORE RESULTS Fetching more results Next Page archive-org-8657 ---- Q. Horati Flacci opera, recens. O. Keller et A. Holder : Quintus Horatius Flaccus : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive Skip to main content See what's new with book lending at the Internet Archive Can You Chip In? In 2020 the Internet Archive has seen unprecedented use—and we need your help. When the COVID-19 pandemic hit, our bandwidth demand skyrocketed. Right now we’re getting over 1.5 million daily unique visitors and storing more than 70 petabytes of data. We build and maintain all our own systems, but we don’t charge for access, sell user information, or run ads. Instead, we rely on individual generosity to fund our infrastructure; we're powered by donations averaging $32. Unfortunately, fewer than 1 in 1000 of our patrons donate. We don't ask often, but right now, we have a 2-to-1 Matching Gift Campaign, tripling the impact of every donation. If each of our users gave just $5, we could end this fundraiser today—so if you find all these bits and bytes useful, please pitch in. We know it's been a difficult year, and we understand if you can't afford to contribute. But if you can afford to lend a hand, I promise it will be money well spent. Thank you for your support. —Brewster Kahle, Founder, Internet Archive Continue Maybe later Send me an email reminder Email address (required) Please enter a valid email address. First name Last name Submit By submitting, you agree to receive donor-related emails from the Internet Archive. Your privacy is important to us. We do not sell or trade your information with anyone. A line drawing of the Internet Archive headquarters building façade. An illustration of a magnifying glass. An illustration of a magnifying glass. An illustration of a horizontal line over an up pointing arrow. Upload An illustration of a person's head and chest. Sign up | Log in An illustration of a computer application window Wayback Machine An illustration of an open book. Books An illustration of two cells of a film strip. Video An illustration of an audio speaker. Audio An illustration of a 3.5" floppy disk. Software An illustration of two photographs. Images An illustration of a heart shape Donate An illustration of text ellipses. More An icon used to represent a menu that can be toggled by interacting with this icon. About Blog Projects Help Donate An illustration of a heart shape Contact Jobs Volunteer People Search Metadata Search text contents Search TV news captions Search archived websites Advanced Search Sign up for free Log in Q. Horati Flacci opera, recens. O. Keller et A. Holder Item Preview remove-circle Share or Embed This Item EMBED EMBED (for wordpress.com hosted blogs and archive.org item tags) [archiveorg qhoratiflacciop00flacgoog width=560 height=384 frameborder=0 webkitallowfullscreen=true mozallowfullscreen=true] Want more? Advanced embedding details, examples, and help! No_Favorite share flag Flag this item for Graphic Violence Graphic Sexual Content texts Q. Horati Flacci opera, recens. O. Keller et A. Holder by Quintus Horatius Flaccus Publication date 1864 Collection europeanlibraries Digitizing sponsor Google Book from the collections of Oxford University Language English Book digitized by Google from the library of Oxford University and uploaded to the Internet Archive by user tpb. Addeddate 2009-05-10 09:25:53 Copyright-region US Identifier qhoratiflacciop00flacgoog Identifier-ark ark:/13960/t3bz6kc13 Ocr ABBYY FineReader 8.0 Pages 849 Possible copyright status NOT_IN_COPYRIGHT Ppi 600 Scandate 20060804 Scanner google Source http://books.google.com/books?id=hFsCAAAAQAAJ&oe=UTF-8 Year 1864 plus-circle Add Review comment Reviews There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write a review. 2,200 Views DOWNLOAD OPTIONS download 1 file ABBYY GZ download download 1 file DAISY download For print-disabled users download 1 file EPUB download download 1 file FULL TEXT download download 1 file ITEM TILE download download 1 file KINDLE download download 1 file PDF download download 1 file SINGLE PAGE PROCESSED JP2 ZIP download download 1 file TORRENT download download 13 Files download 6 Original SHOW ALL IN COLLECTIONS European Libraries Uploaded by Unknown on May 10, 2009 SIMILAR ITEMS (based on metadata) Terms of Service (last updated 12/31/2014) archive-org-9876 ---- Horace and the dialectic of freedom : readings in Epistles 1 : Johnson, W. R. (Walter Ralph), 1933- : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive Skip to main content See what's new with book lending at the Internet Archive Can You Chip In? In 2020 the Internet Archive has seen unprecedented use—and we need your help. When the COVID-19 pandemic hit, our bandwidth demand skyrocketed. Right now we’re getting over 1.5 million daily unique visitors and storing more than 70 petabytes of data. We build and maintain all our own systems, but we don’t charge for access, sell user information, or run ads. Instead, we rely on individual generosity to fund our infrastructure; we're powered by donations averaging $32. Unfortunately, fewer than 1 in 1000 of our patrons donate. We don't ask often, but right now, we have a 2-to-1 Matching Gift Campaign, tripling the impact of every donation. If each of our users gave just $5, we could end this fundraiser today—so if you find all these bits and bytes useful, please pitch in. We know it's been a difficult year, and we understand if you can't afford to contribute. But if you can afford to lend a hand, I promise it will be money well spent. Thank you for your support. —Brewster Kahle, Founder, Internet Archive Continue Maybe later Send me an email reminder Email address (required) Please enter a valid email address. First name Last name Submit By submitting, you agree to receive donor-related emails from the Internet Archive. Your privacy is important to us. We do not sell or trade your information with anyone. A line drawing of the Internet Archive headquarters building façade. An illustration of a magnifying glass. An illustration of a magnifying glass. An illustration of a horizontal line over an up pointing arrow. Upload An illustration of a person's head and chest. Sign up | Log in An illustration of a computer application window Wayback Machine An illustration of an open book. Books An illustration of two cells of a film strip. Video An illustration of an audio speaker. Audio An illustration of a 3.5" floppy disk. Software An illustration of two photographs. Images An illustration of a heart shape Donate An illustration of text ellipses. More An icon used to represent a menu that can be toggled by interacting with this icon. About Blog Projects Help Donate An illustration of a heart shape Contact Jobs Volunteer People Search Metadata Search text contents Search TV news captions Search archived websites Advanced Search Sign up for free Log in Horace and the dialectic of freedom : readings in Epistles 1 Item Preview remove-circle Share or Embed This Item EMBED EMBED (for wordpress.com hosted blogs and archive.org item tags) [archiveorg horacedialectico00john width=560 height=384 frameborder=0 webkitallowfullscreen=true mozallowfullscreen=true] Want more? Advanced embedding details, examples, and help! No_Favorite share flag Flag this item for Graphic Violence Graphic Sexual Content texts Horace and the dialectic of freedom : readings in Epistles 1 by Johnson, W. R. (Walter Ralph), 1933- Publication date 1993 Topics Horace. Epistulae, Horace -- Political and social views, Epistolary poetry, Latin -- History and criticism, Political poetry, Latin -- History and criticism, Liberty in literature, Dialectic, Rome -- In literature Publisher Ithaca, N.Y. : Cornell University Press Collection inlibrary; printdisabled; cornelluniversitypress; americana Digitizing sponsor The Arcadia Fund Contributor Cornell University Press Language English xi, 172 p Includes bibliographical references and index Access-restricted-item true Addeddate 2018-08-07 20:46:29 Bookplateleaf 0006 External-identifier urn:oclc:record:861792600 Foldoutcount 0 Identifier horacedialectico00john Identifier-ark ark:/13960/t17m7dn7z Invoice 1605 Isbn 0801428688 Lccn 93017894 Ocr ABBYY FineReader 11.0 (Extended OCR) Openlibrary_edition OL1409268M Openlibrary_work OL2904469W Page-progression lr Pages 202 Ppi 300 Republisher_date 20180814102927 Republisher_operator associate-joseph-ondreicka@archive.org Republisher_time 167 Scandate 20180814132839 Scanner scribe1.nj.archive.org Scanningcenter nj Tts_version v1.58-final-25-g44facaa Show More Show Less Full catalog record MARCXML plus-circle Add Review comment Reviews There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write a review. 32 Previews 3 Favorites DOWNLOAD OPTIONS download 1 file ENCRYPTED DAISY download For print-disabled users 14 day loan required to access EPUB and PDF files. IN COLLECTIONS Books to Borrow Books for People with Print Disabilities Cornell University Press American Libraries Uploaded by associate-cheri-destefano on August 7, 2018 SIMILAR ITEMS (based on metadata) Terms of Service (last updated 12/31/2014) ar-wikipedia-org-9664 ---- هوراس - ويكيبيديا هوراس من ويكيبيديا، الموسوعة الحرة اذهب إلى التنقل اذهب إلى البحث لمعانٍ أخرى، انظر هوراس (توضيح). هوراس (باللاتينية: Q. Horatius Flaccus)‏    هوراس كما تخيله الرسام أنتون ألكساندر فون فرن    معلومات شخصية الميلاد 8 ديسمبر 65 ق م[1][2][3]  فينوسا[4][5]  الوفاة 27 نوفمبر 8 (-58 سنة) [1][6]  روما  مكان الدفن روما  مواطنة روما القديمة  الحياة العملية تعلم لدى أقراطيبوس[7]  المهنة شاعر[5][8]،  وكاتب[9]،  وفيلسوف  اللغات اللاتينية[9]  بوابة الأدب تعديل مصدري - تعديل   كوينتس هوراتيوس فلاكس أو هوراس (باللاتينية: Qvintvs Horativs Flaccvs؛ 8 ديسمبر 65 ق.م. في فينوسا - 27 نوفمبر 8 ق.م. في روما) كان شاعراً غنائياً وناقداً أدبياً لاتينياً من رومانيا القديمة في زمن أغسطس قيصر، قيل بأن له تأثير على الشعر الإنجليزي. أصر هوراس على أن الشعر يجب أن يقدم السعادة والإرشاد. عُرف الشاعر بالقصائد الغنائية والمقطوعات الهجائية. نشأته[عدل] ولد هوراس في 8 ديسمبر من العام 65 قبل الميلاد، في فينوسيا (تقع الآن في إيطاليا)، وكان ابناً لعبد محرر، ولكنه ولد حراً. أهدر والده الكثير من ماله حتى يتلقى هوراس تعليمه في روما ثم بعثه إلى أثينا ليدرس الإغريقية والفلسفة. قاتل هوراس إلى جانب جيش بروتوس الثائر بسبب اغتيال يوليوس قيصر. تضمنت أعماله الأولى كتب من المقطوعات الهجائية والإبود، ولكن أعماله حول القصائد الغنائية جعلته يشتهر بشكل كبير، ومن بينها بحث "أرس بويتيكا" (Ars poetica) الذي احتوى على قواعد لتركيب الشعر. كتبه تتحدث غالباً عن الحب والصداقة والفلسفة، وأثرت أعماله على الغرب منذ عصر النهضة حتى القرن 19. نجح هوراس نجاحاً باهراً في حياته. ففي حوالي الثالثة والعشرين كان قائداً لكتيبة في جيش بروتوس وكاسيوس اللذين انتصر عليهما أنطونيوس في فيليبي سنة 42 قبل الميلاد، وعلى الرغم من ذلك، استقبل لدى عودته إلى روما استقبالاً حسناً، حيث نعم برعاية ميسيناس، وقدم إلى اغسطس في وقت لاحق، وكان الإمبراطور يستمتع بأشعاره، وكان معظمها ساخراً وهجاء، يبعث على السرور والمرح .[10][11] روابط خارجية[عدل] هوراس على موقع Encyclopædia Britannica Online (الإنجليزية) هوراس على موقع MusicBrainz (الإنجليزية) هوراس على موقع NNDB people (الإنجليزية) هوراس على موقع المكتبة المفتوحة (الإنجليزية) مراجع[عدل] ↑ أ ب http://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/quinto-orazio-flacco_(Enciclopedia-Italiana)/ ^ http://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/quinto-orazio-flacco_(Enciclopedia-Italiana)/ — العنوان : Horatii — نشر في: القاموس الحقيقي للآثار الكلاسيكية للوبكر — إقتباس: ... родился в 689 г. от основания города, т. е. в 65 г. до Р. Х. 8 декабря в Венузии ... ^ http://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/quinto-orazio-flacco_(Enciclopedia-Italiana)/ — المؤلف: William Young Sellar و James Gow — العنوان : Horace — نشر في: الموسوعة البريطانية نسخة سنة 1911 — إقتباس: ... was born on the 8th of December 65 B.C. at Venusia ... ^ العنوان : Horatii — نشر في: القاموس الحقيقي للآثار الكلاسيكية للوبكر ↑ أ ب المؤلف: William Young Sellar و James Gow — العنوان : Horace — نشر في: الموسوعة البريطانية نسخة سنة 1911 ^ http://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/quinto-orazio-flacco_(Enciclopedia-Italiana)/ — العنوان : Horatii — نشر في: القاموس الحقيقي للآثار الكلاسيكية للوبكر — إقتباس: Поэт, согласно предсказанию, которое он дал Меценату, умер вскоре после смерти последнего, когда ему было почти 57 лет, 27 ноября в 8 г. до Р. Х. ^ الصفحة: 502 — نشر في: Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques ^ BeWeb person ID: https://www.beweb.chiesacattolica.it/persone/persona/518/ — تاريخ الاطلاع: 4 أغسطس 2020 ↑ أ ب BeWeb person ID: https://www.beweb.chiesacattolica.it/persone/persona/518/ — الناشر: SISMEL – Edizioni del Galluzzo وسم غير صالح؛ الاسم "7866baa1d2a4db2b7f60b6a8170ce8b8f1a580e9" معرف أكثر من مرة بمحتويات مختلفة. ^ صانعو التاريخ - سمير شيخاني . ^ 1000 شخصية عظيمة - ترجمة د.مازن طليمات . هوراس على مواقع التواصل الاجتماعي هوراس  على جود ريدز. هوراس  على كورا. ع ن ت مواضيع روما القديمة العصور التأسيس المملكة الرومانية الثورة الجمهورية الرومانية الإمبراطورية الرومانية ( الجدول الزمني السلام الروماني عهد الزعامة عهد السيادة انهيار الإمبراطورية الرومانية) الإمبراطورية الرومانية الغربية (السقوط) الإمبراطورية البيزنطية الدستور مجلس الشيوخ الروماني المجالس التشريعية الكيوريت Century Tribal عامة الشعب الحكومة Curia منتدى (روماني) هرم المناصب Collegiality الإمبراطور ليغاتوس دوكس أوفيسيوم البريفيكتوس الفيقار إمبراتور الأغسطس القيصر الحكم الرباعي أوبتيميتس ببيولاريس القُضاة عادي أطربون كويستور بريتور قنصل رقيب حاكم بديل استثنائي دكتاتور ركس إنتركس قائد الفرسان عشرة رجال القانون اللوائح الاثنا عشر موس مايوروم روم (شعب) أوكتوريتاس العسكرية حدود التأسيس التاريخ البنائي لقوة الرومان العسكرية الحملات السيطرة السياسية كاسترا الجيش الروماني فيلق روماني تكتيكات المشاة Siege engines التقنية Abacus أرقام رومانية هندسة رومانية خرسانة رومانية طوب روماني الهندسة العسكرية مجرى مائي مرفوع الجسور سيرك منتدى (روماني) التعدين طرق رومانية ثرمي الحضارة العمارة الفن قصات الشعر مؤسسة إديوكيت ناو الأدب الموسيقى الميثولوجيا الدين الثقافة المجتمع العشائر الجمعية القبلية نساء الحضارة الرومانية الزواج التبني العبودية لغة لاتينية التاريخ ألفبائية لاتينية لغات رومنسية الإصدارات القديمة العصور الوسطى النهضة الجديدة الحديثة الكٌتّاب لوكيوس أبوليوس يوليوس قيصر شيشرون هوراس تيتوس ليفيوس لوكريتيوس أوفيد بلينيوس الأكبر بلينيوس الأصغر كينتيليان سالوست سنكا تاسيتس ترنتيوس فيرجيل فيتروفيو كتولوس إينيوس جوفينال لوكان مارتياليس بترونيوس بلاتوس بروبرتيوس كينتيليان ستاتيوس سويتونيوس تيبولوس فارو القوائم الحروب قائمة الأباطرة الرومان المؤسسات مدن رئيسية الإسكندرية أنطاكية (مدينة تاريخية) أكويليا (مدينة) بولونيا قرطاج القسطنطينية لبدة الكبرى بلاد الغال لاندنوم (مدينة) مدينوليوم (مدينة) بومبي رافينا روما سميرنا ضبط استنادي WorldCat BIBSYS: 90055203 BNC: 000035928 BNE: XX891549 BNF: cb11886570b (data) CANTIC: a10101214 CiNii: DA00782980 EGAXA: vtls000023274 GND: 118553569 ISNI: 0000 0001 2145 2178 LCCN: n79081354 LNB: 000000375 MusicBrainz: af616f1f-6242-4802-a1bf-8d3f0647083c NDL: 00540086 NKC: jn20000603003 NLA: 35206138 NLG: 62641 NLI: 000064806 NLK: KAC199612791 NLP: A11793144 NSK: 000013522 NTA: 068304579 RERO: 02-A000081296 RLS: 000083136 RSL: 000083136 ICCU: IT\ICCU\CFIV\000246 SELIBR: 189659 SNAC: w6pk0m9c SUDOC: 026659166 Trove: 864697 ULAN: 500404135 VIAF: 100227522 J9U: 987007262986605171 بوابة فلسفة بوابة أعلام بوابة أدب بوابة شعر بوابة حضارات قديمة بوابة روما القديمة هذه بذرة مقالة عن شاعر روماني قديم بحاجة للتوسيع. شارك في تحريرها. هوراس في المشاريع الشقيقة صور وملفات صوتية من كومنز مجلوبة من "https://ar.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=هوراس&oldid=49580689" تصنيفات: مواليد 65 ق م مواليد في فينوسا وفيات 8 وفيات بعمر -58 مواليد 65 وفيات في روما هوراس أشخاص من فينوسا جنود رومان قدماء رومان في القرن 1 ق م شعراء العصر الروماني شعراء القرن 1 ق م كتاب القرن 1 ق م كتاب باللغة اللاتينية نقاد أدبيون قدماء وفيات 8 ق م هوراتي وكورياتي تصنيفات مخفية: صفحات تستعمل قالبا ببيانات مكررة صفحات بأخطاء في المراجع صفحات بها بيانات ويكي بيانات صفحات ويكي بيانات بحاجة لتسمية عربية مقالات تحتوي نصا باللاتينية صفحات تستخدم خاصية P1559 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P18 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P2096 مواليد 8 ديسمبر صفحات بها مراجع ويكي بيانات صفحات تستخدم خاصية P569 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P19 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P570 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P20 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P119 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P27 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P1066 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P106 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P1412 مقالات تستعمل روابط فنية ببيانات من ويكي داتا صفحات تستخدم خاصية P1417 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P434 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P1263 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P648 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P2963 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P3417 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P1015 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P1890 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P268 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P1273 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P1309 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P227 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P213 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P244 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P1368 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P349 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P691 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P409 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P3348 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P949 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P5034 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P1695 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P1375 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P1006 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P3065 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P396 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P906 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P3430 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P1315 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P245 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P214 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P8189 بوابة فلسفة/مقالات متعلقة بوابة أعلام/مقالات متعلقة بوابة أدب/مقالات متعلقة بوابة شعر/مقالات متعلقة بوابة حضارات قديمة/مقالات متعلقة بوابة روما القديمة/مقالات متعلقة جميع المقالات التي تستخدم شريط بوابات جميع مقالات البذور بذرة شاعر روماني قديم قائمة التصفح أدوات شخصية غير مسجل للدخول نقاش مساهمات إنشاء حساب دخول نطاقات مقالة نقاش المتغيرات معاينة اقرأ عدل تاريخ المزيد بحث الموسوعة الصفحة الرئيسية الأحداث الجارية أحدث التغييرات أحدث التغييرات الأساسية تصفح المواضيع أبجدي بوابات مقالة عشوائية تصفح بدون إنترنت مشاركة تواصل مع ويكيبيديا مساعدة الميدان تبرع أدوات ماذا يصل هنا تغييرات ذات علاقة رفع ملف الصفحات الخاصة وصلة دائمة معلومات الصفحة استشهد بهذه الصفحة عنصر ويكي بيانات طباعة/تصدير إنشاء كتاب تحميل PDF نسخة للطباعة في مشاريع أخرى ويكيميديا كومنز لغات Afrikaans አማርኛ Aragonés مصرى Asturianu تۆرکجه Башҡортса Žemaitėška Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ Български Brezhoneg Bosanski Català Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Zazaki Ελληνικά English Esperanto Español Eesti Euskara فارسی Suomi Võro Français Furlan Gaeilge Galego עברית हिन्दी Fiji Hindi Hrvatski Magyar Հայերեն Interlingua Bahasa Indonesia Ido Íslenska Italiano 日本語 ქართული Қазақша 한국어 Kurdî Kernowek Latina Lingua Franca Nova Lietuvių Latviešu Malagasy Македонски മലയാളം Монгол मराठी Bahasa Melayu Nāhuatl Nederlands Norsk nynorsk Norsk bokmål Occitan ਪੰਜਾਬੀ Polski Piemontèis Português Română Tarandíne Русский Sardu Sicilianu Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Simple English Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Seeltersk Svenska Kiswahili தமிழ் Tagalog Türkçe Татарча/tatarça Українська Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча Tiếng Việt Volapük Walon Winaray 吴语 中文 粵語 عدل الوصلات آخر تعديل لهذه الصفحة كان يوم 8 أغسطس 2020، الساعة 05:07. النصوص منشورة برخصة المشاع الإبداعي. طالع شروط الاستخدام للتفاصيل. سياسة الخصوصية حول ويكيبيديا إخلاء مسؤولية نسخة المحمول المطورون إحصائيات بيان تعريف الارتباطات arz-wikipedia-org-4843 ---- هوراتيوس - ويكيبيديا هوراتيوس من ويكيبيديا، الموسوعه الحره اذهب إلى التنقل اذهب إلى البحث هوراتيوس (باللاتينى: Q. Horatius Flaccus)    هوراس كما تخيله الرسام أنتون ألكساندر فون فرن    معلومات شخصيه الميلاد 8 ديسمبر 65 ق م[1][2][3]  فينوسا[4][5]  الوفاة 27 نوفمبر 8 ق م[1][6]  روما  مكان الدفن روما  مواطنه روما القديمة  الحياه العمليه اتعلم عند أقراطيبوس[7]  المهنه شاعر[5][8]،  وكاتب[9]،  وفيلسوف  اللغات المحكيه او المكتوبه لاتينى[9]  تعديل  هوراتيوس كوينتوس هوراتيوس فلاكوس(Quintus Horatius Flaccus) (اتولد فينوزا ، 8 ديسمبر 65 ق م – مات روما ، 27 نوفمبر 8 ق م)كان شاعر رومانى قديم مشهور ايام اوجوستوس. مصادر[تعديل] ↑ أ ب http://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/quinto-orazio-flacco_(Enciclopedia-Italiana)/ ↑ http://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/quinto-orazio-flacco_(Enciclopedia-Italiana)/ — العنوان : Horatii — نشر في: القاموس الحقيقي للآثار الكلاسيكية للوبكر — إقتباس: ... родился в 689 г. от основания города, т. е. в 65 г. до Р. Х. 8 декабря в Венузии ... ↑ http://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/quinto-orazio-flacco_(Enciclopedia-Italiana)/ — المؤلف: William Young Sellar و James Gow — العنوان : Horace — نشر في: الموسوعة البريطانية نسخة سنة 1911 — إقتباس: ... was born on the 8th of December 65 B.C. at Venusia ... ↑ العنوان : Horatii — نشر في: القاموس الحقيقي للآثار الكلاسيكية للوبكر ↑ أ ب المؤلف: William Young Sellar و James Gow — العنوان : Horace — نشر في: الموسوعة البريطانية نسخة سنة 1911 ↑ http://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/quinto-orazio-flacco_(Enciclopedia-Italiana)/ — العنوان : Horatii — نشر في: القاموس الحقيقي للآثار الكلاسيكية للوبكر — إقتباس: Поэт, согласно предсказанию, которое он дал Меценату, умер вскоре после смерти последнего, когда ему было почти 57 лет, 27 ноября в 8 г. до Р. Х. ↑ الصفحة: 502 — نشر في: Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques ↑ BeWeb person ID: https://www.beweb.chiesacattolica.it/persone/persona/518/ — تاريخ الاطلاع: 4 اغسطس 2020 ↑ أ ب BeWeb person ID: https://www.beweb.chiesacattolica.it/persone/persona/518/ — الناشر: SISMEL – Edizioni del Galluzzo المرجع غلط: وسم غير صالح؛ الاسم "7866baa1d2a4db2b7f60b6a8170ce8b8f1a580e9" معرف أكثر من مرة بمحتويات مختلفة. فيه فايلات فى تصانيف ويكيميديا كومونز عن: هوراتيوس اتجابت من "https://arz.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=هوراتيوس&oldid=979550" تصانيف: مواليد 65 ق م مواليد 8 ديسمبر مواليد في فينوسا وفيات 8 ق م وفيات في روما شعرا طليان تصنيفات مستخبية: صفحات بأخطاء في المراجع مقالات تحتوي نصا باللاتينى صفحات بها بيانات ويكي بيانات مقالات تحتوي نصا بالروسى صفحات ويكي بيانات بحاجة لتسمية عربية مقالات تحتوي نصا بالانجليزى صفحات تستخدم خاصية P1559 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P18 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P2096 صفحات بها مراجع ويكي بيانات صفحات تستخدم خاصية P569 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P19 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P570 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P20 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P119 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P27 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P1066 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P106 صفحات تستخدم خاصية P1412 لستة التصفح ادوات شخصيه انت مش مسجل دخولك المناقشة مع عنوان الأيبى دا مساهمات افتح حساب دخول النطاقات صفحه مناقشه المتغيرات مناظر قرايه تعديل استعراض التاريخ اكتر تدوير استكشاف الصفحه الرئيسيه بوابات ويكيبيديا مصرى اخر التعديلات صفحة عشوائيه مساعده تواصل صالون المناقشه طريقة الكتابه احداث دلوقتى التبرعات علبة العده ايه بيوصل هنا تعديلات ليها علاقه ارفع فايل (upload file) صفح مخصوصه لينك دايم معلومات عن الصفحه استشهد بالصفحة دى عنصر ويكي بيانات اطبع/صدّر إعمل كتاب تنزيل PDF نسخه للطبع مشاريع تانيه ويكيميديا كومنز بلغات تانيه Afrikaans አማርኛ Aragonés العربية Asturianu تۆرکجه Башҡортса Žemaitėška Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ Български Brezhoneg Bosanski Català Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Zazaki Ελληνικά English Esperanto Español Eesti Euskara فارسی Suomi Võro Français Furlan Gaeilge Galego עברית हिन्दी Fiji Hindi Hrvatski Magyar Հայերեն Interlingua Bahasa Indonesia Ido Íslenska Italiano 日本語 ქართული Қазақша 한국어 Kurdî Kernowek Latina Lingua Franca Nova Lietuvių Latviešu Malagasy Македонски മലയാളം Монгол मराठी Bahasa Melayu Nāhuatl Nederlands Norsk nynorsk Norsk bokmål Occitan ਪੰਜਾਬੀ Polski Piemontèis Português Română Tarandíne Русский Sardu Sicilianu Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Simple English Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Seeltersk Svenska Kiswahili தமிழ் Tagalog Türkçe Татарча/tatarça Українська Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча Tiếng Việt Volapük Walon Winaray 吴语 中文 粵語 عدل الوصلات الصفحه دى اتعدلت اخر مره فى 5 يناير 2020,‏ 09:36. النصوص متوفرة تحت رخصة التشارك الإبداع العزو/المشاركة بالمثل; ممكن تطبيق شروط إضافية. بص على شروط الاستخدام للتفاصيل. بوليسة الخصوصيه عن ويكيبيديا تنازل عن مسئوليه نسخة المحمول مطورين إحصائيات بيان تعريف الارتباطات ast-wikipedia-org-3537 ---- Horaciu - Wikipedia Horaciu De Wikipedia Saltar a navegación Saltar a la gueta Horaciu Vida Nacimientu Venosa (es) [2], 8  d'avientuedC [2] Nacionalidá Antigua Roma Grupu étnicu antiguos romanos (es) Muerte Roma, 27  de payaresedC [1] (56 años) Sepultura Roma Familia Padre valor desconocíu Madre valor desconocíu Estudios Llingües llatín Alumnu de Cratipo de Pérgamo (es) Aristos of Ascalon (en) Oficiu Oficiu poeta, escritor, filósofu Llugares de trabayu Roma Trabayos destacaos Epístola a los Pisones (es) Quintu Horaciu Flaccu, en llatín Quintus Horatius Flaccus, conocíu tradicionalmente como Horaciu, (Venosa, 8 d'avientu de 65 e.C. - Brindisi, 27 de payares de 8 e.C.), ta consideráu como unu de los más grandes poetes romanos. Obres[editar | editar la fonte] Epodi Saturae Carmina Epístoles Carmen saeculare ↑ 1,0 1,1 1,2 «Q45181613» (en rusu). Real'nyj slovar' klassicheskih drevnostej po Ljubkeru.  ↑ 2,0 2,1 William Young Sellar. «EB-11 / Horace» (n'inglés). Encyclopædia Britannica de 1911.  ↑ URL de la referencia: http://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/quinto-orazio-flacco_(Enciclopedia-Italiana)/. ↑ URL de la referencia: http://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/quinto-orazio-flacco_(Enciclopedia-Italiana)/. Sacáu de «https://ast.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Horaciu&oldid=3049465» Categoríes: Homes Escritores de la Roma antigua Categoría anubrida: Wikipedia:Páxines con etiquetes de Wikidata ensin traducir Menú de navegación Ferramientes personales Nun aniciasti sesión Alderique Contribuciones Crear una cuenta Entrar Espacios de nome Páxina Alderique Variantes Vistes Lleer Editar Editar la fonte Ver historial Más Buscar Navegación Portada Portal de la comunidá Fechos actuales Cambeos recientes Páxina al debalu Ayuda Ferramientes Lo qu'enllaza equí Cambios rellacionaos Xubir ficheru Páxines especiales Enllaz permanente Información de la páxina Citar esta páxina Elementu de Wikidata Imprentar/esportar Crear un llibru Descargar como PDF Versión pa imprentar N'otros proyeutos Wikimedia Commons N'otres llingües Afrikaans አማርኛ Aragonés العربية مصرى تۆرکجه Башҡортса Žemaitėška Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ Български Brezhoneg Bosanski Català Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Zazaki Ελληνικά English Esperanto Español Eesti Euskara فارسی Suomi Võro Français Furlan Gaeilge Galego עברית हिन्दी Fiji Hindi Hrvatski Magyar Հայերեն Interlingua Bahasa Indonesia Ido Íslenska Italiano 日本語 ქართული Қазақша 한국어 Kurdî Kernowek Latina Lingua Franca Nova Lietuvių Latviešu Malagasy Македонски മലയാളം Монгол मराठी Bahasa Melayu Nāhuatl Nederlands Norsk nynorsk Norsk bokmål Occitan ਪੰਜਾਬੀ Polski Piemontèis Português Română Tarandíne Русский Sardu Sicilianu Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Simple English Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Seeltersk Svenska Kiswahili தமிழ் Tagalog Türkçe Татарча/tatarça Українська Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча Tiếng Việt Volapük Walon Winaray 吴语 中文 粵語 Editar los enllaces La última edición d'esta páxina foi el 26 set 2020, a les 08:51. El testu ta disponible baxo la Llicencia Creative Commons Reconocimientu/CompartirIgual 3.0; puen aplicase otres cláusules más. Llei les condiciones d'usu pa más detalles. Política d'intimidá Tocante a Wikipedia Avisu llegal Vista pa móvil Desendolcadores Estadístiques Declaración de cookies authority-bibsys-no-6258 ---- Field Value System control number 90055203 autid x90055203 handle http://hdl.handle.net/11250/355163 scn 90055203 isni 0000000121452178 viaf http://viaf.org/viaf/100227522 bibbi 17146 Status kat3 Authority type PERSON Created date Tue Sep 21 00:00:00 CEST 2010 Last update date Wed Feb 19 17:36:06 CET 2020 Deleted false Personal name Horatius Flaccus, Quintus 386$a rom. 386$m Nasjonalitet/regional gruppe 386$2 bs-nasj Personal name (See From Tracing) Horats Personal name (See From Tracing) Flaccus, Quintus Horatius Personal name (See From Tracing) Horatz Personal name (See From Tracing) Horace Personal name (See From Tracing) Horaz Personal name (See From Tracing) Orazio Nonpublic general note Navneform hentet fra 'Greske og latinske navneformer innti Heading or subdivision term Poeta (65-8 f.Kr.) Latin. Carmen saeculare er del av verke azb-wikipedia-org-1928 ---- هوراس - ویکی‌پدیا هوراس ویکی‌پدیا، آچیق بیلیک‌لیک‌دن پرش به ناوبری پرش به جستجو هوراس Horace, as imagined by Anton von Werner دؤغوم‌تاریخی December 8, 65 BC Venusia, Italy, روم جومهوریتی اؤلوم‌تاریخی November 27, 8 BC (age 56) روم یاشایش یئری Rome ایش Soldier, scriba quaestorius, شاعیر دیل Latin میللیت روم جومهوریتی دیرلی‌ایشلری Odes هوراس (اینگیلیسجه: Horace) شاعیر و یازیچی - ایچینده‌کیلر ۱ بیرده باخ ۲ قایناق‌لار ۳ ائشیک باغلانتی‌لار ۴ گؤرونتولر بیرده باخ[دَییشدیر] ادبی تنقیدچی ادبیات تاریخی ادبیات آخیملاری قایناق‌لار[دَییشدیر] اینگیلیسجه ویکی‌پدیاسی‌نین ایشلدنلری طرفیندن یارانمیش«Horace»، مقاله‌سیندن گؤتورولوبدور. (۲۲ آقوست ۲۰۱۷ تاریخینده یوْخلانیلیبدیر). ائشیک باغلانتی‌لار[دَییشدیر] قارداش پروژه‌لرده هوراس گؤره داها آرتیق بیلگی‌لر تاپابیلرسینیز. فایل‌لار ویکی‌آمباردا ب دان دییش ادبیات نؤعلری نثر آنی (خاطره) دوزیازی (نثر) ده‌نه‌مه الشتیری گزی گونلوک مقاله اؤیکو (حیکایه، داستان) رومان رومانس قیسا اؤیکو قیسا رومان حماسه اسطوره‌آفرینی طنز تراژدی نمایش‌نامه نوشتار بیوگرافی (شرح حال) پاورقی حکایت روایت تراژدی مثل مکتوب اوتوبیوگرافی رپورتاژ (گزارش) نظم پوئما داستان شعر غنایی مثنوی غزل قصیده قطعه رباعی مربع تویوق بایاتی گرایلی قوشما (تجنیس * دوداق‌ده‌یمز * قیفیل‌بند مخمس مسدس مسبع مثمن معشر مستزاد ترکیب‌بند ترجیع‌بند درام تراژدی (فاجعه) کومدی درام گؤرونتولر[دَییشدیر] «https://azb.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=هوراس&oldid=663985»-دن آلینمیش‌دیر بؤلمه: یازیچیلار گیزلی بؤلمه: اینگیلیس دیلی سؤزجوک‌لو مقاله‌لر دوْلانماق مِنوسو شخصی آراجلار گیرمه‌میسینیز دانیشیق چالیشمالار حساب آچ گیریش ائت آد فضالاری صفحه دانیشیق دئییش‌لر گؤرونوشلر اوْخو دَییشدیر گئچمیشه باخ بیشتر آختار دوْلانماق آنا صفحه کند مئیدانی ایندیکی حادیثه‌لر سوْن دَییشیکلیکلر تصادوفی صفحه کؤمک باغیشلا آلتلر بۇ صفحه‌‌يه باغلانتیلار باغلی دَییشیکلیک‌لر فایل یۆکله‌ اؤزل صفحه‌لر ثابیت لینک صفحه ایطلاعاتی بو صفحه‌دن آلینتی گؤتور ویکی‌دئیتا آیتمی چاپ ائت/ائشیگه چیخارت کیتاب یارات PDF کیمی ائندیر چاپ اۆچون نۆسخه آیری پروژه‌لرده ویکی‌انبار آیری دیل‌لرده Afrikaans አማርኛ Aragonés العربية مصرى Asturianu Башҡортса Žemaitėška Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ Български Brezhoneg Bosanski Català Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Zazaki Ελληνικά English Esperanto Español Eesti Euskara فارسی Suomi Võro Français Furlan Gaeilge Galego עברית हिन्दी Fiji Hindi Hrvatski Magyar Հայերեն Interlingua Bahasa Indonesia Ido Íslenska Italiano 日本語 ქართული Қазақша 한국어 Kurdî Kernowek Latina Lingua Franca Nova Lietuvių Latviešu Malagasy Македонски മലയാളം Монгол मराठी Bahasa Melayu Nāhuatl Nederlands Norsk nynorsk Norsk bokmål Occitan ਪੰਜਾਬੀ Polski Piemontèis Português Română Tarandíne Русский Sardu Sicilianu Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Simple English Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Seeltersk Svenska Kiswahili தமிழ் Tagalog Türkçe Татарча/tatarça Українська Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча Tiếng Việt Volapük Walon Winaray 吴语 中文 粵語 باغلانتیلاری دَییشدیر بۇ صفحه‌‌ سوْن دفعه ‏۵ دسامبر ۲۰۱۸، ‏۱۷:۱۰ تاریخینده دَییشدیریلمیشدیر. یازی Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License;آلتیندا‌دیر آرتیق شرطلر آرتیریلا بیلر. آرتیق ایطلاعات اوچون ایشلتمه شرطلرینه باخین. گیزلیلیک سیاستی ویکی‌پدیا-ه گؤره یالانلامالار موبایل نوسخه‌سی‌ گئنیشلدنلر آمار کوکی ایظهارنامه‌سی‌ bat-smg-wikipedia-org-5836 ---- Huoracėjos - Wikipedia Huoracėjos Straipsnis ėš Vikipedėjės, encikluopedėjės žemaitėškā. Jump to navigation Jump to search Huoracėjos Huoracėjos (Quintus Horatius Flaccus, 65 m. pr. Kr. groudė 8 – 8 m. lapkristė 27 d.) – vėins žīmiausiu luotīnu kalba rašiosiu puetu. Gautė ėš „https://bat-smg.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Huoracėjos&oldid=304850“ Kateguorėjės: Antėkas puoetā Senuobės Ruomas rašītuojē Naršīma pasirinkėmā Asabėnē rakondā Neprėsėjongis Aptarėms Kūriejē Pasėdėrbtė paskīra Prėsėjongtė Vardū srėtis Poslapis Aptarėms Atmainā Parveizė̄jėmā Skaitītė Taisītė Taisītė straipsnė wiki teksta Istuorėjė Daugiau Ėiškuotė Naršīms Pėrms poslapis Kuolektīvs Vielībė̄jė pakeitėmā Bikuoks poslapis Pagelba Puoslaugis Rakondā Sosėjė̄ straipsnē Sosėjė̄ pakeitėmā Ožkrautė abruozdieli Specēlė̄jė poslapē Nūlatėnė nūruoda Poslapė infuormacėjė Cėtoutė ton poslapi Vikiduomenys īrašos Ėšgoldītė/Eksportoutė Dėrbtė kninga Siōstėis PDF skvarmuo Atmains spausdėnėmou Kėtūs tinklapiūs Vikiteka Kėtuom kalbuom Afrikaans አማርኛ Aragonés العربية مصرى Asturianu تۆرکجه Башҡортса Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ Български Brezhoneg Bosanski Català Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Zazaki Ελληνικά English Esperanto Español Eesti Euskara فارسی Suomi Võro Français Furlan Gaeilge Galego עברית हिन्दी Fiji Hindi Hrvatski Magyar Հայերեն Interlingua Bahasa Indonesia Ido Íslenska Italiano 日本語 ქართული Қазақша 한국어 Kurdî Kernowek Latina Lingua Franca Nova Lietuvių Latviešu Malagasy Македонски മലയാളം Монгол मराठी Bahasa Melayu Nāhuatl Nederlands Norsk nynorsk Norsk bokmål Occitan ਪੰਜਾਬੀ Polski Piemontèis Português Română Tarandíne Русский Sardu Sicilianu Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Simple English Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Seeltersk Svenska Kiswahili தமிழ் Tagalog Türkçe Татарча/tatarça Українська Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча Tiếng Việt Volapük Walon Winaray 吴语 中文 粵語 Keistė nūruodas Tas poslapis paskotėni sīki parkeists 8 kuova 2013, 17:13. Vėskos īr pateikama vagol Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; gal būtė da ė papėlduomu ėšlīgu. Veiziekat nauduojėma sālīgas, ka būtō aiškiau. Privatoma puolitėka Aple Wikipedia Atsakuomībės aprėbuojims Parveiza so mobėlio telepuono Dėrbiejē Statistika Slapukų politika ba-wikipedia-org-8930 ---- Гораций — Башҡорт Википедияһы Гораций Википедия — ирекле энциклопедия мәғлүмәте Перейти к навигации Перейти к поиску Saturae, 1577 Гора́ций, тулы исеме Квинт Гораций Флакк (лат. Quintus Horatius Flaccus) (б. э. т. 65, Венузия ҡ. (хәҙерге Италиялағы Базиликата регионында урынлашҡан) — б. э. т. 8, Рим) — Рим әҙәбиәтенең «алтын быуаттарындағы» шағир. Шиғриәте ваҡытындағы ваҡиғалар: Рим Республикаһы бөтөрөлөүе, Римдағы граждандар һуғышы. Был Боронғо Греция тураһында тамамланмаған мәҡәлә. Һеҙ мәҡәләне төҙәтеп һәм тулыландырып проектҡа ярҙам итә алаһығыҙ. https://ba.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Гораций&oldid=758819 ҡабул ителгән Категориялар: Римда вафат булғандар Боронғо Рим шағирҙары Б. э. т. I быуат шағирҙары Латин шағирҙары «Илаһи комедия» персонаждары Эстетиктар Йәшерен категория: Боронғо Греция тураһында тамамланмаған мәҡәләләр Навигация Шәхси ҡоралдар Танылмағанһығыҙ Әңгәмә Башҡарған эштәр Яңы ҡатнашыусыны теркәү Танылыу Исем арауыҡтары Мәҡәлә Фекер алышыу Варианттар Ҡарауҙар Уҡыу Үҙгәртергә Вики-тексты үҙгәртергә Тарихты ҡарау Тағы Эҙләү Төп йүнәлештәр Баш бит Алфавитлы күрһәткес Ағымдағы ваҡиғалар Мәҡәләләр Һайланған Яҡшы Сифатлы 1 000 мотлаҡ 10 000 әһәмиәтле Башҡортнамә Яңы мәҡәләләр Осраҡлы мәҡәлә Ҡатнашыу Берләшмә Ҡоролтай Һуңғы үҙгәртеүҙәр Белешмә Иғәнә Матди ярҙам Ҡоралдар Бында һылтанмалар Бәйле үҙгәртеүҙәр Махсус биттәр Даими һылтанма Бит мәғлүмәттәре Мәҡәләгә һылтанма яһа Викидата элементы Баҫтырырға/сығарырға Китап төҙөргә PDF форматында күсереп алырға Баҫтырыу өлгөһө Башҡа проекттарҙа Викимилек Башҡа телдәрҙә Afrikaans አማርኛ Aragonés العربية مصرى Asturianu تۆرکجه Žemaitėška Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ Български Brezhoneg Bosanski Català Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Zazaki Ελληνικά English Esperanto Español Eesti Euskara فارسی Suomi Võro Français Furlan Gaeilge Galego עברית हिन्दी Fiji Hindi Hrvatski Magyar Հայերեն Interlingua Bahasa Indonesia Ido Íslenska Italiano 日本語 ქართული Қазақша 한국어 Kurdî Kernowek Latina Lingua Franca Nova Lietuvių Latviešu Malagasy Македонски മലയാളം Монгол मराठी Bahasa Melayu Nāhuatl Nederlands Norsk nynorsk Norsk bokmål Occitan ਪੰਜਾਬੀ Polski Piemontèis Português Română Tarandíne Русский Sardu Sicilianu Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Simple English Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Seeltersk Svenska Kiswahili தமிழ் Tagalog Türkçe Татарча/tatarça Українська Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча Tiếng Việt Volapük Walon Winaray 吴语 中文 粵語 Һылтанмаларҙы төҙәт Был бит һуңғы тапҡыр 17:33 13 ноябрь 2017 үҙгәртелгән. Текст Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike лицензияһы шарттары буйынса асыҡ, айырым осраҡтарҙа өҫтәмә шарттар ғәмәлдә булырға мөмкин. Тулы мәғлүмәт өсөн ҡарағыҙ: Ҡулланыу шарттары. Сер һаҡлау сәйәсәте Википедия тураһында Яуаплылыҡтан баш тартыу Мобиль нөсхә Яһаусылар Статистика Cookie тураһында килешеү be-tarask-wikipedia-org-5496 ---- Гарацыюс — Вікіпэдыя Гарацыюс Зьвесткі зь Вікіпэдыі — вольнай энцыкляпэдыі Перайсьці да навігацыі Перайсьці да пошуку Гарацыюс Асабістыя зьвесткі Нарадзіўся 8 сьнежня 65 да н. э.[1][2][3] Вэноза, Патэнца, Базыліката, Італія[2][3] Памёр 27 лістапада 8 да н. э.[1][2] (56 гадоў) Рым, Старажытны Рым Пахаваны Рым Бацькі невядома невядома Літаратурная дзейнасьць Род дзейнасьці паэт, пісьменьнік і філёзаф Мова лацінская мова[4] Гарацыюс у Вікісховішчы Квінт Гара́цыюс Флак (па-лацінску: Quintus Horatius Flaccus; 65 да н. э., Вэнузія, сёньня ў рэгіёне Базыліката, Італія — 8 да н. э., Рым) — рымскі паэт «залатога стагодзьдзя» рымскай літаратуры. Яго творчасьць прыпадае на эпоху грамадзянскіх войн канца рэспублікі і першыя дзесяцігодзьдзі новага рэжыма Актавіяна Аўгуста. Аўтар шматлікіх сатырычных і лірічных твораў, паэтычных пасланьняў (у тым ліку «Навука паэзіі» або «Пасланьне да Пізонаў»). Беларускія пераклады[рэдагаваць | рэдагаваць крыніцу] На беларускую мову яго творы перакладалі Максім Багдановіч (ода «Помнік»), Алесь Жлутка, Антон Францішак Брыль. Да Мецэната; Да Ліцынія Мурэны; Да Леўканоі // «Тутэйшыя». Мн., 1989; Крыніцы[рэдагаваць | рэдагаваць крыніцу] ^ а б http://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/quinto-orazio-flacco_(Enciclopedia-Italiana)/ ^ а б в Любкер Ф. Horatii // Реальный словарь классических древностей по Любкеру / под ред. Ф. Ф. Зелинский, А. И. Георгиевский, М. С. Куторга и др. — СПб.: Общество классической филологии и педагогики, 1885. — С. 641–643. ^ а б W. Y. S., J. G. Horace // Encyclopædia Britannica — 11 — NYC: 1911. — Vol. 13. — P. 687–691. ^ Mirabile: Digital Archives for Medieval Culture — SISMEL – Edizioni del Galluzzo. Вонкавыя спасылкі[рэдагаваць | рэдагаваць крыніцу] Легкадумны заўсёды я. Выбраныя оды Нарматыўны кантроль BIBSYS: 90055203 BNC: 000035928 BNE: XX891549 BNF: cb11886570b (data) CANTIC: a10101214 CiNii: DA00782980 GND: 118553569 ISNI: 0000 0001 2145 2178 LCCN: n79081354 LNB: 000000375 MusicBrainz: af616f1f-6242-4802-a1bf-8d3f0647083c NDL: 00540086 NKČ: jn20000603003 NLA: 35206138 NLG: 62641 NLI: 000064806 NLK: KAC199612791 NLP: A11793144 NSK: 000013522 NTA: 068304579 RERO: 02-A000081296 RSL: 000083136 ICCU: IT\ICCU\CFIV\000246 SELIBR: 189659 SNAC: w6pk0m9c SUDOC: 026659166 Trove: 864697 ULAN: 500404135 VIAF: 100227522 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n79081354 Гэта — накід артыкула пра пісьменьніка альбо пісьменьніцу. Вы можаце дапамагчы Вікіпэдыі, пашырыўшы яго. Атрымана з «https://be-tarask.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Гарацыюс&oldid=2171521» Катэгорыі: Нарадзіліся 8 сьнежня Нарадзіліся ў 65 годзе да н. э. Нарадзіліся ў Італіі Памерлі 27 лістапада Памерлі ў 8 годзе да н. э. Памерлі ў Рыме Старажытнарымскія паэты Гарацыюс Схаваная катэгорыя: Вікіпэдыя:Накіды:Пісьменьнікі і пісьменьніцы Навігацыйнае мэню Асабістыя прылады Вы не ўвайшлі ў сыстэму Гутаркі Унёсак Стварыць рахунак Увайсьці Прасторы назваў Артыкул Абмеркаваньне Варыянты Рэжымы Чытаць Рэдагаваць Рэдагаваць крыніцу Паказаць гісторыю Болей Пошук Навігацыя Галоўная старонка Выпадковы артыкул Рубрыкацыя Абраныя артыкулы Удзел Паведаміць пра памылку Паведаміць пра памылку Форум Апошнія зьмены Новыя старонкі Дапамога Ахвяраваньні Інструмэнты Спасылкі на старонку Зьвязаныя рэдагаваньні Спэцыяльныя старонкі Сталая спасылка Зьвесткі пра старонку Цытаваць старонку Аб’ект Вікізьвестак Друк/экспарт Стварыць кнігу Загрузіць як PDF Вэрсія для друку У іншых праектах Вікісховішча На іншых мовах Afrikaans አማርኛ العربية Aragonés Asturianu تۆرکجه Башҡортса Беларуская Български Bosanski Brezhoneg Català Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά English Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Fiji Hindi Français Furlan Gaeilge Galego 한국어 Հայերեն हिन्दी Hrvatski Ido Bahasa Indonesia Interlingua Íslenska Italiano עברית ქართული Қазақша Kernowek Kiswahili Kurdî Latina Latviešu Lietuvių Lingua Franca Nova Magyar Македонски Malagasy മലയാളം मराठी مصرى Bahasa Melayu Монгол Nāhuatl Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Norsk nynorsk Occitan Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча ਪੰਜਾਬੀ Piemontèis Polski Português Română Русский Sardu Seeltersk Sicilianu Simple English Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Tagalog தமிழ் Tarandíne Татарча/tatarça Türkçe Українська Tiếng Việt Volapük Võro Walon Winaray 吴语 粵語 Zazaki Žemaitėška 中文 Правіць спасылкі Гэтая старонка апошні раз рэдагавалася 26 сьнежня 2020 году ў 00:05. Гэты тэкст даступны на ўмовах ліцэнзіі Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike 3.0; у асобных выпадках могуць ужывацца дадатковыя ўмовы. Глядзіце падрабязнасьці ва Ўмовах выкарыстаньня. Wikipedia® — зарэгістраваны гандлёвы знак Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., некамэрцыйнай арганізацыі. Палітыка прыватнасьці Пра Вікіпэдыю Адмова ад адказнасьці Мабільная вэрсія Распрацоўнікі Statistics Дамова пра файлы-кукі be-wikipedia-org-3485 ---- Гарацый — Вікіпедыя Гарацый З пляцоўкі Вікіпедыя Jump to navigation Jump to search Гарацый лац.: Q. Horatius Flaccus Гарацый (Карціна Антона фон Вернера) Асабістыя звесткі Дата нараджэння 8 снежня 65 да н.э.[1][2][3] Месца нараджэння Веноза[d], правінцыя Патэнца[d], Базіліката, Італія[2][3] Дата смерці 27 лістапада 8 да н.э.[1][2] (56 гадоў) Месца смерці Рым, Рымская імперыя, Старажытны Рым Пахаванне Рым Грамадзянства Старажытны Рым Бацька невядома Маці невядома Прафесійная дзейнасць Род дзейнасці паэт, пісьменнік, філосаф Мова твораў лацінская мова Творы ў Вікікрыніцах  Выявы на Вікісховішчы Цытаты ў Вікіцытатніку Гарацый, Квінт Гарацый Флакк (лац.: Quintus Horatius Flaccus; 8 снежня 65 да н.э., Венузія, сёння ў рэгіёне Базіліката, Італія — 27 лістапада 8 да н.э., Рым) — рымскі паэт «залатога стагоддзя» рымскай літаратуры. Яго творчасць прыпадае на эпоху грамадзянскіх войн канца рэспублікі і першыя дзесяцігоддзі новага рэжыма Актавіяна Аўгуста. Аўтар шматлікіх сатырычных і лірічных твораў, паэтычных пасланняў (у тым ліку "Навука паэзіі" або "Пасланне да Пізонаў"). Змест 1 Жыццё 2 Творчасць 3 Беларускія пераклады 4 Зноскі 5 Літаратура 6 Спасылкі Жыццё[правіць | правіць зыходнік] Гарацый нарадзіўся ў Венузіі ў сям'і вольнаадпушчаніка. Праз пэўны час бацька паэта перабраўся ў Рым, дзе працаваў пасярэднікам пры куплях. Дзякуючы гэтаму, ён змог даць сыну бліскучую адукацыю: той навучаўся спачатку ў Рыме, а пасля ў Афінах. Пасля гібелі Цэзара малады Гарацый далучыўся да войска Марка Юнія Брута, і ў якасці афіцэра ўдзельнічаў у бітве пры Філіпах; войска было разбітае, Брут учыніў самагубства, а Гарацый здолеў уратаваць жыццё ўцёкамі. Пасля абвяшчэння амністыі для ворагаў пераможнага Аўгуста Гарацый вярнуўся ў Італію. Ягоная маёмасць была канфіскаваная, аднак ён здолеў атрымаць чыноўніцкую пасаду, якая давала яму дастаткова сродкаў для жыцця і творчасці. Праз знаёмства з Вергіліем Гарацый увайшоў у кола сяброў Мецэната, які ўзяў на сябе клопат пра матэрыяльнае ўладкаванне паэта, падарыўшы таму маёнтак каля Тыбура. Паступова перайшоў на пазіцыі цэзарызму. Памёр Гарацый у Рыме ва ўзросце 56 год. Творчасць[правіць | правіць зыходнік] «Эподы» Гарацыя — ямбічныя вершы разнастайнага зместу, лепшыя з якіх заклікалі да згоды і міру, і 2 кнігі «Сатыр» («Гутарак») на філасофска-этычныя тэмы створаны паміж 41 і 30 да н.э. Грамадзянскім, філасофскім, велічальным (усхвалялі Мецэната і імператара Аўгуста), любоўным, сяброўскім і застольным одам Гарацыя («Песні», кн. 1—3, 23 да н.э., кн. 4, 17—13 да н.э.) уласцівы яскравая вобразнасць, тонкі гумар, вьгганчанасць мовы і кампазіцыі, рытмічнае багацце. Для твораў Гарацыя характэрны культ суладдзя, мудрай разважлівасці («залатой сярэдзіны») і прыгажосці. У «Пасланні да Пізонаў» («Навука паэзіі», увайшло ў «Пасланні», кн. 1—2, 20—13 да н.э.) выклаў свае эстэтычныя прынцыпы, якія былі ўзяты за аснову тэарэтычнай праграмы еўрапейскага класіцызму. На беларускую мову яго творы перакладалі М. Багдановіч (ода «Помнік»), А. Жлутка, А. Ф. Брыль. Беларускія пераклады[правіць | правіць зыходнік] Да Мецэната; Да Ліцынія Мурэны; Да Леўканоі // «Тутэйшыя». Мн., 1989; Зноскі ↑ 1,0 1,1 http://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/quinto-orazio-flacco_(Enciclopedia-Italiana)/ ↑ 2,0 2,1 2,2 Любкер Ф. Horatii // Реальный словарь классических древностей по Любкеру / под ред. Ф. Ф. Зелинский, А. И. Георгиевский, М. С. Куторга и др. — СПб.: Общество классической филологии и педагогики, 1885. — С. 641–643. ↑ 3,0 3,1 W. Y. S., J. G. Horace // Encyclopædia Britannica — 11 — NYC: 1911. — Vol. 13. — P. 687–691. Літаратура[правіць | правіць зыходнік] Малюковіч С. Гарацый // БелЭн у 18 т. Т. 5. Мн., 1997. Спасылкі[правіць | правіць зыходнік] На Вікісховішчы ёсць медыяфайлы па тэме Гарацый Біяграфія і вершы Гарацыя на сайце часопіса «ПрайдзіСвет»     Тэматычныя сайты Discogs · International Music Score Library Project · MusicBrainz · Project Gutenberg · Project Gutenberg Слоўнікі і энцыклапедыі Вялікая каталанская · Вялікая нарвежская · Вялікая расійская · Вялікая савецкая (1 выд.) · Бракгаўза і Ефрона · Малы Бракгаўза і Ефрона · Рэальны слоўнік класічных старажытнасцяў · Britannica (11-th) · Britannica (онлайн) · Brockhaus · Notable Names Database · Treccani · Universalis · Universalis Нарматыўны кантроль BAV: ADV12139878, ADV11561527, ADV11452220 · BIBSYS: 90055203 · BNC: a10101214 · BNE: XX891549 · BNF: 11886570b · CiNii: DA00782980 · CONOR: 8323171 · EGAXA: vtls000023274 · GND: 118553569 · ICCU: IT\ICCU\CFIV\000246 · ISNI: 0000 0001 2145 2178 · LCCN: n79081354, no92010069 · LNB: 000000375 · NDL: 00540086 · NKC: jn20000603003 · NLA: 35206138 · NLG: 62641 · NLP: A11793144 · NSK: 000013522 · NTA: 068304579 · NUKAT: n96210540 · PTBNP: 19592 · РДБ: 000083136, 000039740 · LIBRIS: 189659 · SUDOC: 026659166 · VIAF: 100227522, 2130151778256418130004 · ULAN: 500404135 · WorldCat VIAF: 100227522, 2130151778256418130004 Узята з "https://be.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Гарацый&oldid=3759177" Катэгорыі: Нарадзіліся 8 снежня Нарадзіліся ў 65 годзе да н.э. Нарадзіліся ў правінцыі Патэнца Памерлі 27 лістапада Памерлі ў 8 годзе да н.э. Памерлі ў Рыме Пахаваныя ў Рыме Асобы Пісьменнікі паводле алфавіта Гарацый Лацінамоўныя паэты Паэты Старажытнага Рыма Паэты I стагоддзя да н.э. Паэтыка Персанажы «Боскай камедыі» Асобы на марках Эстэтыкі Схаваная катэгорыя: Вікіпедыя:Артыкулы з крыніцамі з Вікідадзеных Навігацыя Асабістыя прылады Не ўвайшоў Размовы Уклад Стварыць уліковы запіс Увайсці Прасторы назваў Артыкул Размовы Варыянты Віды Чытаць Правіць Правіць зыходнік Паказаць гісторыю More Знайсці Навігацыя Галоўная старонка Супольнасць Апошнія змены Новыя старонкі Форум Выпадковая старонка Даведка Ахвяраванні Паведаміць пра памылку Прылады Сюды спасылаюцца Звязаныя праўкі Адмысловыя старонкі Нязменная спасылка Звесткі пра старонку Цытаваць гэту старонку Элемент Вікідадзеных Друк/экспарт Стварыць кнігу Загрузіць як PDF Для друку У іншых праектах Вікісховішча Вікіцытатнік Вікікрыніцы На іншых мовах Afrikaans አማርኛ Aragonés العربية مصرى Asturianu تۆرکجه Башҡортса Žemaitėška Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ Български Brezhoneg Bosanski Català Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Zazaki Ελληνικά English Esperanto Español Eesti Euskara فارسی Suomi Võro Français Furlan Gaeilge Galego עברית हिन्दी Fiji Hindi Hrvatski Magyar Հայերեն Interlingua Bahasa Indonesia Ido Íslenska Italiano 日本語 ქართული Қазақша 한국어 Kurdî Kernowek Latina Lingua Franca Nova Lietuvių Latviešu Malagasy Македонски മലയാളം Монгол मराठी Bahasa Melayu Nāhuatl Nederlands Norsk nynorsk Norsk bokmål Occitan ਪੰਜਾਬੀ Polski Piemontèis Português Română Tarandíne Русский Sardu Sicilianu Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Simple English Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Seeltersk Svenska Kiswahili தமிழ் Tagalog Türkçe Татарча/tatarça Українська Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча Tiếng Việt Volapük Walon Winaray 吴语 中文 粵語 Правіць спасылкі Апошняе змяненне старонкі адбылося 16:14, 20 снежня 2020. Тэкст даступны на ўмовах ліцэнзіі Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike, у асобных выпадках могуць дзейнічаць дадатковыя ўмовы. Падрабязней гл. Умовы выкарыстання. Палітыка прыватнасці Пра Вікіпедыю Адмова ад адказнасці Мабільная версія Распрацоўшчыкі Statistics Cookie statement bg-wikipedia-org-4315 ---- Хораций – Уикипедия Хораций от Уикипедия, свободната енциклопедия Направо към навигацията Направо към търсенето ХорацийQ. Horatius Flaccus древноримски писател Роден 8 декември 65 г. пр.н.е. Венусия, дн.Италия Починал 27 ноември 8 г. пр.н.е. (58 г.) Рим, Италия Погребан Рим, Италия Семейство Баща неизвестна Майка неизвестна Хораций в Общомедия Квинт Хораций Флак (на лат. Quintus Horatius Flaccus) или Хораций е римски поет от Златния век на римската литература. Неговото творчество обхваща революционната епоха на Древен Рим – края на републиката и първото десетилетие на новия режим на Октавиан Август. Бащата на Хораций е бил земевладелец, освободен роб. Съумял да даде на сина си солидно образование в училищата в Рим, откъдето бъдещия поет тръгнал към Атина, за да се усъвършенства. Там Хораций попаднал сред средите на републикански настроени аристократични младежи. През 42 г. пр.н.е. той взема участие в решителната битка при Филипи (в Македония) (между силите на Марк Антоний и Октавиан Август срещу тези на Марк Юний Брут и Касий) След поражението на републиканците и дадената амнистия за билите се на страната на загубилия, Хораций се връща в Италия, където разбира, че баща му е мъртъв, а имотите им са конфискувани. За да се издържа, става писар. Вергилий го въвежда в кръга на Меценат, който става негов приятел и покровител и го представя на Октавиан. От републиканец Хораций става поддръжник на монархията. На Хораций принадлежи репликата Carpe diem (Наслаждавай се на момента). Изследвания[редактиране | редактиране на кода] Костова, Мария. Правото в поезията на Хораций. С., 2010. Костова, Мария. Правният език и правните ситуации като стилистично средство в поезията на Хораций. – В: Езици и култури в диалог: Традиции, приемственост, новаторство. Конференция, посветена на 120-годишната история на преподаването на класически и нови филологии в Софийския университет „Св. Климент Охридски“. С., УИ, 2010, Външни препратки[редактиране | редактиране на кода] ((la)) Произведения на Хораций Уикицитат съдържа колекция от цитати от/за Хораций. Тази статия, свързана с Древен Рим, все още е мъниче. Помогнете на Уикипедия, като я редактирате и разширите. Тази статия за писател все още е мъниче. Помогнете на Уикипедия, като я редактирате и разширите. Взето от „https://bg.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Хораций&oldid=10308455“. Категория: Древноримски поети Скрити категории: Родени през 65 година пр.н.е. Родени на 8 декември Починали през 8 година пр.н.е. Починали на 27 ноември Мъничета за Древен Рим Мъничета за писатели Навигация Лични инструменти Не сте влезли в системата Беседа Приноси Създаване на сметка Влизане Именни пространства Статия Беседа Варианти Прегледи Преглед Редактиране Редактиране на кода История Още Търсене Навигация Начална страница Случайна статия За Уикипедия Блог на общността Страница за контакт Направете дарение Участвайте Защо? Помощ Изпробване Последни промени Нова статия GitHub Общувайте Общи разговори Обсъждани статии Фейсбук група Дискорд IRC Инструменти Какво сочи насам Свързани промени Качване на файл Специални страници Постоянна препратка Информация за страницата Цитиране на статията Обект в Уикиданни Отпечатване/изнасяне Създаване на книга Изтегляне като PDF Версия за печат В други проекти Общомедия Уикицитат На други езици Afrikaans አማርኛ Aragonés العربية مصرى Asturianu تۆرکجه Башҡортса Žemaitėška Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ Brezhoneg Bosanski Català Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Zazaki Ελληνικά English Esperanto Español Eesti Euskara فارسی Suomi Võro Français Furlan Gaeilge Galego עברית हिन्दी Fiji Hindi Hrvatski Magyar Հայերեն Interlingua Bahasa Indonesia Ido Íslenska Italiano 日本語 ქართული Қазақша 한국어 Kurdî Kernowek Latina Lingua Franca Nova Lietuvių Latviešu Malagasy Македонски മലയാളം Монгол मराठी Bahasa Melayu Nāhuatl Nederlands Norsk nynorsk Norsk bokmål Occitan ਪੰਜਾਬੀ Polski Piemontèis Português Română Tarandíne Русский Sardu Sicilianu Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Simple English Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Seeltersk Svenska Kiswahili தமிழ் Tagalog Türkçe Татарча/tatarça Українська Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча Tiếng Việt Volapük Walon Winaray 吴语 中文 粵語 Редактиране Последната промяна на страницата е извършена на 25 май 2020 г. в 05:44 ч. Текстът е достъпен под лиценза Creative Commons Признание-Споделяне на споделеното; може да са приложени допълнителни условия. За подробности вижте Условия за ползване. Поверителност За контакт с Уикипедия Предупреждение Мобилен изглед За разработчици Статистика Използване на „бисквитки“ books-google-com-3633 ---- Brill's Companion to Horace - Google Books Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More » Sign in Books Try the new Google Books Check out the new look and enjoy easier access to your favorite features Try it now No thanks Try the new Google Books Try the new Google Books My library Help Advanced Book Search Get print book No eBook available Amazon.com Barnes&Noble.com Books-A-Million IndieBound Find in a library All sellers » 0 ReviewsWrite review Brill's Companion to Horace edited by Hans-Christian Günther   About this book Get Textbooks on Google Play Rent and save from the world's largest eBookstore. Read, highlight, and take notes, across web, tablet, and phone. Go to Google Play Now » Pages displayed by permission of BRILL. Copyright.  Page 7      Restricted Page You have reached your viewing limit for this book (why?). br-wikipedia-org-45 ---- Quintus Horatius Flaccus - Wikipedia Quintus Horatius Flaccus Eus Wikipedia Sauter à la navigation Sauter à la recherche Horace, hervez Anton von Werner Quintus Horatius Flaccus (Horas a-wechoù e brezhoneg), ganet d'an 8 a viz Kerzu, 65 kent J-K ha marvet d'ar 27 a viz Du eus ar bloavezh 8 kent J-K) a oa ar barzh latin pennañ en amzer Aogust. Ganet e oa bet e Venosia, ur gêr vihan war an harz etre Apulia ha Lukania. Mab ur sklav frankizet e oa hag un deskadurezh vat a voe roet dezhañ. Goude muntr Caius Julius Caesar e soudardas Horace e lu Brutus ha stourm a reas en Emgann Philippi gant ar renk a d-tribunus militum. Pa embannas Aogust un distaol evit ar re o doa brezelet outañ e tistroas da Italia met lamet e oa bet e zouareier digantañ gant ar Stad. Daoust ma lavare e oa aet da baour e voe barrek Horatius da brenañ ur post scriba quaestorius a roas tro dezhañ da vevañ en un doare klet. Gant Maecenas e voe gwarezet. Mervel a reas en 8 kent J-K, un nebeud mizioù hepken goude marv e warezer. Anavezet eo buhez Horas dre e oberenn, leun a zitour diwar e benn. Re all a lenner en De viris illustribus gant Suetonius. Oberennoù[kemmañ | kemmañ ar vammenn] Sermonum liber primus [1] (35 Kt J-K) Epodes [2] (30 Kt J-K) Sermonum liber secundus [3] (30 Kt J-K) Carminum liber primus [4] (23 Kt J-K) Carminum liber secundus [5] (23 Kt J-K) Carminum liber tertius [6] (23 Kt J-K) Epistularum liber primus [7] (20 Kt J-K) Ars Poetica' [8] (18 Kt J-K) Carmen Saeculare [9] (17 Kt J-K) Epistularum liber secundus [10] (14 Kt J-K) Carminum liber quartus [11] (13 Kt J-K) Liammoù diavaez[kemmañ | kemmañ ar vammenn] Oberennoù Horace e latin hag e saozneg Adtapet diwar « https://br.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Quintus_Horatius_Flaccus&oldid=1620280 » Rummadoù : Skrivagnerien latin Skrivagnerien Henroma Ganedigezhioù -65 Marvioù -8 Lañser merdeiñ Ostilhoù personel Digevreet Kaozeal Ma degasadennoù Krouiñ ur gont Kevreañ Esaouennoù anv Pajenn Kaozeadenn Adstummoù Gweladennoù Lenn Kemmañ Kemmañ ar vammenn Gwelet an istor Muioc'h Klask Merdeiñ Degemer Kemmoù diwezhañ Ur bajenn dre zegouezh Meneger hollek Kemer perzh Skoazell Porched ar gumuniezh Tavarn Reiñ Ostilhoù Pajennoù liammet Heuliañ ar pajennoù liammet Kargañ war ar servijer Pajennoù dibar Chomlec'h ar stumm-mañ Titouroù ar bajenn Menegiñ ar pennad-mañ Elfenn Wikidata Moullañ/ezporzhiañ Sevel ul levr Pellgargañ evel PDF Stumm da voullañ E raktresoù all Wikimedia Commons Wikiarroud Yezhoù all Afrikaans አማርኛ Aragonés العربية مصرى Asturianu تۆرکجه Башҡортса Žemaitėška Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ Български Bosanski Català Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Zazaki Ελληνικά English Esperanto Español Eesti Euskara فارسی Suomi Võro Français Furlan Gaeilge Galego עברית हिन्दी Fiji Hindi Hrvatski Magyar Հայերեն Interlingua Bahasa Indonesia Ido Íslenska Italiano 日本語 ქართული Қазақша 한국어 Kurdî Kernowek Latina Lingua Franca Nova Lietuvių Latviešu Malagasy Македонски മലയാളം Монгол मराठी Bahasa Melayu Nāhuatl Nederlands Norsk nynorsk Norsk bokmål Occitan ਪੰਜਾਬੀ Polski Piemontèis Português Română Tarandíne Русский Sardu Sicilianu Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Simple English Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Seeltersk Svenska Kiswahili தமிழ் Tagalog Türkçe Татарча/tatarça Українська Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча Tiếng Việt Volapük Walon Winaray 吴语 中文 粵語 Kemmañ al liammoù Kemmoù diwezhañ degaset d'ar bajenn-mañ d'an 13 C'hwe 2015, da 17:26. Gallout a reer implijout an testennoù zo dindan an Aotre-Implijout Creative Commons Dereiñ/Kenrannañ diouzh an hevelep divizoù; divizoù ouzhpenn a c'hall bezañ ivez. Gwelet an Doareoù Implijout evit gouzout hiroc'h. Reolennoù prevezded Diwar-benn Wikipedia Kemennoù Gwel evit an hezoug Diorroerien Statistiques Diskrêriadur war an toupinoù bs-wikipedia-org-5045 ---- Horacije - Wikipedia Horacije S Wikipedije, slobodne enciklopedije Idi na navigaciju Idi na pretragu Ovaj članak ili neki od njegovih odlomaka nije dovoljno potkrijepljen izvorima (literatura, veb-sajtovi ili drugi izvori). Ako se pravilno ne potkrijepe pouzdanim izvorima, sporne rečenice i navodi mogli bi biti izbrisani. Pomozite Wikipediji tako što ćete navesti validne izvore putem referenci te nakon toga možete ukloniti ovaj šablon. Horacije Kvint Horacije Flak - (Quintus Horatius Flaccus, decembar, 65. p. n. e. - 27. novembar 8 p. n. e.), rimski pjesnik. Biografija[uredi | uredi izvor] Horacije je rođen u decembru 65. p. n. e. u Venusiji, Italija, umro je 27. novembra 8. p. n. e. u Rimu. Njegov otac je bio rob koji je stekao slobodu prije Horacijevog rođenja. Moglo bi se pretpostaviti da je u ropstvo pao za vrijeme Pompeja, odnosno nakon Spartakovog ustanka. Svog sina je odveo u jednu od najpoznatijih škola poznatog Sabelijanca po imenu Orbilus (koji je po Horaciju bio pristalica tjelesnog kažnjavanja). 46. g. p. n. e. Horacije posjećuje predavanja na Atinskoj Akademiji gdje prve stihove počinje pisati na grčkom. Kad je Brut u Ateni prikupljao vojsku protiv Oktavijana i Antonija, zajedno sa sinovima Cicerona i Katona, u nju stupa i Horacije. Međutim u bitki kod Filipa poražena je republika, a i tribunus militium Horacije. Nakon toga se Horacije vraća u Rim i posvećuje pjesništvu. 38. g. p. n. e. je doveden kod Mecene, učenog čovjeka iz Etrurije iz središnje Italije, koji je bio glavni politički savjetnik Augusta. Mecena je Horacija uveo u pjesnički književni krug, a uz to mu poklonio i luksuznu vilu. Po izgledu Horacije je bio nizak i debeo, posjedio prije vremena, lahko bi se iznervirao ali brzo i smirio. Commons ima datoteke na temu: Horacije Preuzeto iz "https://bs.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Horacije&oldid=3067432" Kategorije: Rimska imperija Rimska književnost Sakrivena kategorija: Članci koji trebaju izvor Navigacija Lični alati Niste prijavljeni Razgovor Doprinosi Napravi korisnički račun Prijavi me Imenski prostori Stranica Razgovor Varijante Pregledi Čitaj Uredi Uredi izvor Historija Više Pretraga Navigacija Početna strana Odabrani članci Portali Kategorije Nedavne izmjene Nasumična stranica Interakcija Pomoć Igralište Vrata zajednice Čaršija Novosti Donacije Alati Šta vodi ovamo Srodne izmjene Postavi datoteku Posebne stranice Trajni link Informacije o stranici Citiraj ovu stranicu Na Wikipodacima Štampanje / izvoz Napravi knjigu Preuzmi kao PDF Za štampanje Na drugim projektima Wikimedia Commons Wikicitat Drugi jezici Afrikaans አማርኛ Aragonés العربية مصرى Asturianu تۆرکجه Башҡортса Žemaitėška Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ Български Brezhoneg Català Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Zazaki Ελληνικά English Esperanto Español Eesti Euskara فارسی Suomi Võro Français Furlan Gaeilge Galego עברית हिन्दी Fiji Hindi Hrvatski Magyar Հայերեն Interlingua Bahasa Indonesia Ido Íslenska Italiano 日本語 ქართული Қазақша 한국어 Kurdî Kernowek Latina Lingua Franca Nova Lietuvių Latviešu Malagasy Македонски മലയാളം Монгол मराठी Bahasa Melayu Nāhuatl Nederlands Norsk nynorsk Norsk bokmål Occitan ਪੰਜਾਬੀ Polski Piemontèis Português Română Tarandíne Русский Sardu Sicilianu Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Simple English Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Seeltersk Svenska Kiswahili தமிழ் Tagalog Türkçe Татарча/tatarça Українська Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча Tiếng Việt Volapük Walon Winaray 吴语 中文 粵語 Uredi veze Ova stranica je posljednji put izmijenjena na datum 14 novembar 2019 u 22:23. Tekst je dostupan pod slobodnom licencom Autorstvo-Dijeliti pod istim uvjetima; mogu se primijeniti i dodatni uvjeti. Korištenjem ovog sajta slažete se s uvjetima korištenja i pravilima o privatnosti. Wikipedia® je zaštitni znak neprofitne organizacije Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Politika privatnosti O Wikipediji Odricanje odgovornosti Mobilni prikaz Razvojni programeri Statistika Izjava o kolačićima catalogo-bne-es-9923 ---- Autoridades de la B.N.: Búsqueda Nueva búsqueda Cambiar Formato Etiquetado MARC21 GARR/Tesauro Formato: Etiquetado Horacio Flaco, Quinto Lugar de nacimiento: Venosa, Basilicata, Italia Lugar de fallecimiento: Roma (Ciudad), Italia Otros lugares asociados: Roma Categoría profesional: Poetas Lengua: Latín Usado por: Horace Horacio Horacy Horaci Horatius Flaccus, Q. Horaci Flac, Q. Horacio Flaco, Q. Horatius Flaccus, Quintus Horaz Orazio Fuentes: Obras completas, 1986; port. (Horacio) R.C. Ap. IV; (Horacio Flaco, Quinto) Sàtires, 2008; port. (Horaci) Odes i Epodes, 2009; (Q. Horaci Flac) Odes i Epodes, 2009; port. (Q. Horaci Flac) Dic. de escritores célebres, 1995; (Horacio (Quintus Horatius Flaccus); poeta latino (Venusia, 65-Roma, 8 a.C.)) Otro identificador normalizado: http://viaf.org/viaf/100227522 viaf http://www.isni.org/isni/0000000121452178 isni https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q6197 wikidata Registro en datos.bne.es: http://datos.bne.es/resource/XX891549 Nº Registro: XX891549 Obras Marcar/Desmarcar todos los de esta páginaAñadir marcados a la lista de registros    Borrar toda la lista de registros Añadir este registro a su lista    Borrar toda la lista de registros Exportar registros En Formato Por qué medio marcados en esta página guardados en la lista ( 0) EtiquetadoGARR/Tesauro MARC21ISO2709  Por pantalla  Por fichero Buzón de sugerencias Página principal | Inicio página catalogue-bnf-fr-8781 ---- Notice de personne "Horace (0065-0008 av. J.-C.)" | BnF Catalogue général - Bibliothèque nationale de France Aller au contenu Espace personnel Utilisez votre espace personnel pour :   Réserver vos places et documents sur   le site François-Mitterrand.   Réserver vos documents sur les sites  Richelieu-Louvois (y compris les Cartes et plans), Opéra, Arsenal.   Ajouter vos notices et les classer.   Voir vos achats de reproductions. Se connecter Aide Aide à la consultation du catalogue Une question ? Historique Mon panier Tout Gallica Haut-de-jardin Lancer la recherche    Recherche avancée Recherches ciblées Autres recherches Recherches ciblées Auteurs A-Z SUJETS A-Z PÉRIODIQUES COTE  Notices d'autorité dans univers Dans les univers jeunesse images et cartes musique Accueil Nom de personne Notice de personne Notice Au format public Au format Intermarc Au format Unimarc Horace (0065-0008 av. J.-C.) forme courante français Horatius Flaccus, Quintus (0065-0008 av. J.-C.) forme internationale latin Langue(s) :  latin Sexe :  Masculin Responsabilité(s) exercée(s) sur les documents :  Auteur Naissance :  -0065 Mort :  -0008 Forme(s) rejetée(s) :  < Flaccus, Quintus Horatius (0065-0008 av. J.-C.) < Horatius (0065-0008 av. J.-C.) < Orazio (0065-0008 av. J.-C.) italien Forme(s) associée(s) :  >> << British library -- Manuscrit. Harley 2724 >> << Horace, Villa d' (Italie) Source(s) :  Odes ; Épodes ; Chant séculaire / Horace ; traduction du latin, introduction et notes par Jean Mayer, 2006 GDEL . - Buchwald : Horace (Q. Horatius Flaccus) . - Kleine Pauly BN Cat. gén. : Horace (Quintus Horatius Flaccus) Domaine(s) :  800 Identifiant international :  ISNI 0000 0001 2145 2178 , cf. http://isni.org/isni/0000000121452178 Notice n° :  FRBNF11886570 Création :  84/07/31 Mise à jour :  19/07/25 Fermer ce volet Ouvrir ce volet Outils Citer la notice : Voir la notice dans le catalogue actuel Télécharger/Imprimer Envoyer par courriel Ajouter à mes notices Information Afin de voir une sélection de notices, veuillez sélectionner au moins une notice dans la liste de résultats. Notices bibliographiques liées Voir les notices liées en tant que : auteur (1632) sujet (178) Voir toutes les notices liées (1806) Œuvres liées Œuvres de l'auteur (6) Œuvres de l'auteur (Liste A-Z) Ajouter à mes notices Les notices sélectionnées ont bien été ajoutées dans votre espace personnel. > Voir mes notices dans mon espace personnel Haut de page Conditions d'utilisation | À propos | Écrire à la BnF | V 12.1.5 ca-wikipedia-org-7101 ---- Horaci - Viquipèdia, l'enciclopèdia lliure Horaci De Viquipèdia Salta a la navegació Salta a la cerca Per a altres significats sobre el nom "Horaci", vegeu «Gens Horàcia». Quint Horaci Flac Retrat imaginari d'Horaci per Anton von Werner. L'Epístola als Pisons o Art poètica d'Horaci és un dels textos cabdals sobre literatura de la tradició occidental. Nom original (la) Q. Horatius Flaccus Biografia Naixement 8 desembre 65 aC Venosa (Itàlia) Mort 27 novembre 8 aC (56 anys) Roma Sepultura Roma Dades personals Nacionalitat Imperi Romà Grup ètnic Antics romans Activitat Ocupació Poeta líric i satíric Període República Romana Activitat 41 aC - 13 aC Moviment Epicureisme Tema Reflexió moral i estètica literària Professors Cràtip de Mitilene i Arist Influències (llatines): Gai Valeri Catul (gregues): Arquíloc de Paros; Hiponacte d'Efes; Alceu Influències en Autors de Renaixement, Generació del 27 Obra Primeres obres Les Sàtires Obres destacables Ars Poetica o Epístola als Pisons Família Pares valor desconegut  i valor desconegut Quint Horaci Flac (llatí: Quintus Horatius Flaccus), conegut simplement com a Horaci (Venosa, a la regió de la Basilicata (antiga Lucània), a l'actual Itàlia, 8 de desembre del 65 aC - Roma, 27 de novembre del 8 aC), fou un poeta líric i satíric llatí. Fill d'un esclau alliberat, va tenir l'oportunitat de seguir estudis a Roma, i posteriorment a Atenes, on es va traslladar per estudiar filosofia. Una vegada allà, va ser acollit per Brutus, l'assassí de Cèsar, que li va donar un alt càrrec al seu exèrcit. No obstant això, en la Batalla de Filipos (42 aC) es va evidenciar la seva falta d'aptitud per a l'art militar i va decidir tornar a Roma. Va començar a treballar com a escriba, càrrec que li deixava temps lliure per dedicar-se a escriure versos. En aquells dies va conèixer Virgili, que el va introduir en el cercle de Mecenes, en què a poc a poc va guanyar rellevància i va afermar l'amistat amb aquest, que el va presentar a August. Va aconseguir també la protecció de l'emperador, que fins i tot li va oferir el càrrec de secretari personal seu, que va rebutjar per no adequar-se als principis de la seva moral epicúria. Fou molt respectat en els alts cercles romans, tant literaris com polítics; es va mantenir sempre sota la protecció de Mecenes, juntament amb qui està enterrat. La poesia horaciana, amb la seva varietat de temes nacionals i, sobretot, la seva perfecció formal, signe d'equilibri i serenitat, va ser identificada en el Renaixement com la màxima i més excelsa expressió literària de les virtuts clàssiques. Contingut 1 Biografia 1.1 Cronologia 2 La crisi del paganisme 3 L'existencialisme d'Horaci 4 Influència en la literatura posterior 5 Obres 5.1 Sàtires 5.2 Epodes 5.3 Carmina 5.4 Epístoles 5.5 Cant secular 5.5.1 Antecedents 5.5.2 Objectius del cant d'encàrrec d'August 5.5.3 Edicions 5.5.4 Transmissió manuscrita 5.5.5 Traduccions al català i castellà 6 Traductors 7 Referències 8 Bibliografia 8.1 Vida i obra d'Horaci 8.2 Traduccions en català 8.3 Edicions bilingües 8.4 Edicions crítiques 9 Vegeu també 10 Enllaços externs 10.1 En anglès 10.2 En francès Biografia[modifica] Retrat d'Horaci a la seva casa de Venosa Quint Horaci Flac (llatí: Quintus Horatius Flaccus) va néixer el 65 aC[1] a Venosa (llatí: Venusa), una ciutat situada entre els límits de la Lucània i l'Apúlia;[2] la ciutat era un pas de comerciants entre les dues regions i aquest fet, juntament amb el fet que diverses famílies romanes, normalment les famílies dels militars que van participar en la guerra civil del 91-99 aC, es van assentar en aquelles terres com a pagament, explica que Horaci creixés en un entorn en el qual es va familiaritzar amb diversos dialectes llatins. Era fill d'un llibert que va exercir com a coactor, és a dir, una mena de cobrador de subhastes[3] i, tot i la seva modesta fortuna, va fer un esforç per poder-li donar una bona educació i el va acompanyar a Roma perquè assistís a les classes del rètor Orbilius, de qui no guarda pas gaires bons records pels seus mètodes.[4] El 45 aC es va traslladar a Atenes, on entrà en contacte amb els corrents filosòfics de l'epicureisme i l'estoïcisme. Allà va fer amistat amb Marc Valeri Messal·la Corví i Luci Calpurni Bíbul.[5] L'any 44 aC, l'any de l'assassinat de Juli Cèsar, Horaci encara era a Atenes i va coincidir amb Brutus i Cassi, que havien viatjat fins allà per trobar suport a la seva causa. Va ser nomenat tribunus militum, un dels sis oficials de les legions, cosa que va despertar enveges entre els seus companys nascuts en classes més benestants.[6] El 42 aC, en la Batalla de Filipos,[7][8] Octavi i Marc Antoni van vèncer l'armada republicana de Brutus. Horaci descriu aquest dia com un dels més vergonyosos de la seva vida, ja que va lluitar contra Octavi i és una manera de redimir-se;[9] per altra banda, també és un recurs poètic freqüent en els poetes grecs que més el van influenciar: Arquíloc de Paros i Hipònax d'Efes;[10] i, com ells, també va abandonar el seu escut. Octavi August va oferir una amnistia per a aquells que van donar suport a la causa de Brutus, i Horaci la va acceptar, però, en tornar a Itàlia, es va trobar que li havien confiscat tots els béns per pagar els soldats veterans que havien participat en la campanya contra Brutus i Cassi. Per poder viure, es va veure obligat a treballar i es va llogar com a escriba quaestorius.[11] També és en aquesta època que va començar a escriure poesia i freqüentar cercles literaris. El 39 aC, va ser presentat a Mecenes per part de Virgili i Luci Vari Rufus, però va tardar nou mesos a rebre la invitació formal per formar part del cercle de Mecenes.[12] Amb ell, va establir una profunda amistat, que queda demostrada en les seves obres de tal manera que gairebé en tots els llibres dedica el primer poema al seu protector. Mecenes també l'arribà a apreciar molt, fins al punt que li va regalar una finca al camp sabí l'any 32 aC.[13][14][15] Va participar en el tractat de Tàrent, un tractat que marcava una nova pau entre Octavi August i Marc Antoni i l'allargament del triumvirat vigent fins al moment, tot i que es va trencar aviat, car Marc Antoni va buscar el suport de Cleòpatra i es va enfrontar a Octavi.[16] El 19 aC mor el seu amic Virgili[17] i, dos anys després, el 17 aC, August li encomana la composició del Cant secular, en commemoració dels jocs seculars celebrats per festejar l'entrada a una nova època de pau, una pau que va arribar amb la derrota de Marc Antoni. Va morir el 8 aC, dos mesos després de la mort de Mecenes, a qui dedica la seva Carmina 8[17] que, a més a més, és una oda premonitòria de la seva pròpia mort. Cronologia[modifica] Any 65 aC neix Horaci, el mateix any que el que va ser el seu patró Pol·lió. 63. Neix Octavi. Conjuració de Catilina. 60. Constitució del primer triumvirat (Juli Cèsar, Pompeu i Cras). 53. Derrota de Cras a Carras pels parts. 49. Juli Cèsar passa el Rubicó. Guerra civil entre Juli Cèsar i Pompeu. 48. Victòria de Juli Cèsar a Farsàlia. 45. Arriba Horaci a Atenes. 44. Assassinat de Juli Cèsar. 43. Guerra de Mòdena. Constitució del Segon triumvirat (Octavi, Marc Antoni i Lèpid). Proscripcions i mort de Ciceró. Naixement d'Ovidi. 42. Victòria dels cesarians a Filipos. Horaci entre els derrotats. 39. Presentació d'Horaci a Mecenes. Casa d'Horaci a Venosa 37. Viatge a Bríndisi amb ocasió de la conferència de Tàrent. 36. Derrota de Sext Pompeu Pius en la Batalla de Nauloc. 35. Publicació del primer llibre de Sàtires. 32. Mecenes regala una masia a Horaci.[18] 31. Victòria d'Octavi en la Batalla d'Àccium sobre Marc Antoni i Cleòpatra. 30. Publicació del llibre II de Sàtires i el llibre dels Epodes. 30. Mecenes cau molt malalt. A la seva recuperació, és rebut per gran part del poble romà amb una gran ovació al teatre de Pompeu.[19] 29. Victoria final en la Batalla d'Àccium.[20] 29. Triple triomf en la Guerra de Dalmàcia, la Batalla d'Àccium i la Guerra d'Egipte.[21] 28. Ludi Actiati (jocs commemoratius per la victòria en la Batalla d'Àccium). 27. Expedició als pobles bàrbars.[22] 27. Final de la il·legalitat revolucionària. Octavi rep el títol d'August. 26. Expedició a Britannia.[23] 25. Expedició a Aràbia.[23] 25. Guerres càntabres. Viatge amb August a Hispània.[24] 25. Matrimoni Marc Marcel-Júlia (filla d'August).[25] 24. Mort de Quintili Varus.[26] 24. Mort de Marc Marcel.[25] 23. Licini Murena conspira contra August, però és descobert i condemnat a mort.[27] 23. Publicació dels tres primers llibres d'Odes. El compositor Benedictus Ducis publicà cants fúnebres sobre aquestes, a tres i quatre veus el 1539.[28] 20. Publicació del primer llibre d'Epístoles. 19. Viatge de Virgili a Grècia.[29] 19. Moren Virgili i Tibul. 17. Celebració dels Jocs Seculars. Cant Secular. 15. Publicació del llibre II de les Epístoles. 13. Publicació del llibre IV de les Odes. El compositor Benedictus Ducis publicà cants fúnebres sobre aquestes, a tres i quatre veus el 1539.[28] 8 aC. Mor Mecenàs. Mor Horaci. La crisi del paganisme[modifica] A partir del segle I aC, els romans van començar a perdre la fe en el sistema religiós del paganisme, aquelles creences ja no eren aptes per a proporcionar respostes adequades a les grans preguntes existencials del món romà. El paganisme es redueix cada vegada més a la pràctica d'un conjunt de rituals i litúrgies que no condueixen a un coneixement més profund del significat esotèric de les tradicions espirituals i religioses, sinó perquè estan relacionats amb els mos maiorum (el costum dels ancestres), la identitat cultural i, sobretot, amb el calendari romà. Darrere de la façana de la religió pagana, no hi ha certeses, però sí que hi ha el buit deixat per la falta de resposta a les grans qüestions existencials, en una societat imperial cada vegada més cosmopolita. L'individu romà, o almenys tots els que gaudeixen d'una certa cultura, perceben aquest buit, l'angoixa, la inseguretat, la certesa de sentir-se privats, a causa de la desaparició d'un estat de valors ben definits com va passar en l'era republicana, i busquen les respostes en una altra part: la filosofia hel·lenística. Aquest sentit espiritual d'inseguretat, que la major part de la classe literària del segle, des de Catul a Lucreci, Horaci i fins a arribar a Sèneca, està molt estès. Per tant, és en relació amb la crisi del paganisme, la raó que es doni àmplia difusió, en el segle I aC, de l'epicureisme en els cercles intel·lectuals de Roma. En aquest període, en els principals cercles epicuris romans com el de la ciutat de Nàpols, és on probablement Horaci va conèixer Virgili i Vari, que posteriorment va presentar-lo a Mecenes. L'epicureisme volia resoldre qualsevol dubte i l'angoixa existencial de la mort, veient la cancel·lació definitiva de la percepció sensorial com el final d'alguns dels sofriments i preocupacions de la Terra. La mort és, per tant, considerada com una zona tranquil·la però infeliç, l'alliberament de la vida, com succeeix en la mort del cos i de l'ànima (per ser ambdues substàncies materials). Epicur va tenir una reacció optimista davant d'aquestes al·legacions. Aquest sentiment es troba en altres intel·lectuals que es van sumar als romans abans de la filosofia de la buidor eterna de la mort. Buit amb una sensació d'horror, també presents en el mateix Lucreci que, mentre que la descripció s'estén al gairebé mític Epicur, rerum inventor, no passa així amb el missatge alliberador d'aquesta filosofia. L'epicureisme no va ser capaç de curar, a la fi, el mal del segle dins la vida romana. No serà capaç d'omplir el buit deixat per la crisi no sols del sistema religiós, sinó també de la de les institucions republicanes, una crisi que acabaria destruint la seguretat de les bases culturals i socials de l'Imperi Romà. L'existencialisme d'Horaci[modifica] Horaci s'uneix a l'epicureisme parcialment, així com a la recerca de respostes sobre les grans qüestions de la vida, respostes que no troba mai: el poeta sembla que mai ha escapat de l'angoixa de la mort, que sempre la percep com a imminent. És interessant analitzar l'opinió que el poeta llatí va tenir del més enllà, ja que és, sens dubte, molt sincer: encara que vetllat per una certa seguretat, pròpia de l'aurea mediocritas de què Horaci volia ser un exemple, en diverses ocasions brilla amb una vena de malenconia acompanyada de notes de fosc lirisme i elegància, que traeix el seu veritable estat interior. A vegades Horaci apareix com el que probablement era realment: un home que va trobar refugi en la vida de la mort, però en realitat mai no va aconseguir curar-se completament la por a la mort, ja que preferia fugir en lloc de lluitar estoicament. La seva personalitat pot semblar, a primera vista, ambigua. Aquesta ambigüitat es deriva de la diferència que a vegades es crea entre la imatge que Horaci va voler donar de si mateix, i la veritable personalitat del poeta que traspassa de les línies no coincideix, com sosté Ugo Enrico Paoli, "res [...] sembla tan difícil com entrar en l'ànima d'Horaci. La representació del més enllà horacià, tanmateix amb una forta empremta de motlle epicureista, ve segellada de la millor manera en l'afirmació, no sense una nota de malenconia, expressada en l'Oda 7 del Llibre IV: « Pulvis et umbra sumus » Influència en la literatura posterior[modifica] Article principal: Tòpics horacians Carpe diem Els temes i tòpics creats per Horaci tindran un suport universal al llarg de la literatura posterior a la seva mort. Essencialment a partir del Renaixement, és difícil de trobar una sola composició no influïda pels tòpics o les formes horacianes. Així, destaquen poetes com Ronsard, Petrarca o Garcilaso, que escriuen envoltats per la dolçor i les reflexions horacianes. A Espanya, podem trobar grans influències horacianes en José Cadalso o Moratín i fins i tot altres autors que seguiran el camí preparat pel poeta romà. Horaci també influí en poetes anglesos com John Keats o John Milton. Més endavant, en la generació del 27, també trobarem influències horacianes en poetes com en el val·lisoletà Jorge Guillén. En Vicent Andrés Estellés amb el seu poemari Horacianes. No obstant això, amb el pas del temps, l'admiració a aquest gran poeta es convertirà en un apogeu dels seus tòpics en detriment del mateix autor. Aquest serà engolit pels seus propis temes i pel desfasament de la cultura a finals del segle xx i començaments del XXI. El seu Carpe diem (Carpe diem quam minimum credula postero "Aprofita el dia, no confiïs en el demà") de l'Oda 1,11 acaba per convertir-se pràcticament en una dita universal en la qual la identitat de l'autor queda relegada gairebé a l'oblit. Així, Horaci, s'anirà oblidant i aquest oblit reforçarà la importància de la vulgarització dels seus tòpics. Realment, l'escriptor llatí ha rebut poques crítiques que es fonamentin en el buit existencial de les seves reflexions o de les seves formes poètiques; no obstant això, és cert que va rebre crítiques del sector literari més suspicaç, per exemple els seus contemporanis Quadrat i especialment d'Hermògenes, l'adversari i detractor d'Horaci, inicialment ben disposat envers aquest (l'anomena optimus cantor et modulator) i després enemistat per causes que, segons Horaci, es devien a l'enveja: Hermògenes s'oposava a les sàtires, però tampoc tenia talent per fer grans obres i es dedicava a l'ensenyament mentre Horaci adquiria gran fama. Sembla que quan Horaci parla de Pantolabus es refereix a aquest Hermògenes. A mesura que avancen els segles, les crítiques a aquesta figura de la poesia universal acaben per apagar-se, deixant el camí lliure cap a la llista interminable d'adulacions que des del Renaixement se li han prodigat. En el segle xxi, es fa gairebé impossible trobar una sola crítica a una figura tan rellevant com Horaci, però d'aquesta mateixa manera és difícil trobar un càntic a la seva persona i a la seva tasca. L'única crítica coneguda fins ara amb certa rellevància és el "A tu, Horaci", del ceutí Hugo de Lara López, obra en la qual s'ataca Horaci per la seva presumpta doble moral (acusació que en l'antiguitat mai no se li va fer), i en la qual es dóna una importància desmesurada al fet de no respectar les seves verdaderes creences i per ofendre i condemnar, de manera metafòrica, el poble pla, que sempre va defugir. Curiosament, l'objectiu de la crítica, estesa en dos sonets, fa referència al famós Aurea mediocritas ('punt mitjà daurat') del poeta llatí, al·ludeix a l'intent d'assolir un punt desitjat mitjà entre els extrems o un estat ideal en el qual no afectin en excés ni les alegries ni les penes; està relacionat amb l'hedonisme epicureista, basat a conformar-se amb el que es té i no deixar-se portar per les emocions desproporcionades. És un dels tòpics que van fer gran Horaci, per a la posteritat, al costat del Carpe diem en el Beatus Ille. Obres[modifica] La seva poesia es divideix en quatre gèneres que donen nom a les seves obres: Sàtires, retrats irònics del seu temps, dividits en dos llibres i escrits en hexàmetres; Epodes, disset poemes iàmbics de temàtica variada i influència hel·lenística; Carmina (Odes), també en hexàmetres; Epístoles, la seva última obra, en la qual, coincidint amb una actitud vital i literària més calmada i més propícia a la reflexió moral que a la invectiva i la sàtira que van caracteritzar les seves obres primeres, va optar per la ficció epistolar sense abandonar l'escriptura en hexàmetres. Entre les Epístoles, es troba la cèlebre Art poètica, que va marcar les pautes de l'estètica literària llatina. Sàtires[modifica] Saturae, 1577 Les Sàtires d'Horaci, publicades entre el 35 aC i el 28 aC, s'agrupen en dos reculls, l'un de deu peces i l'altre de vuit (en hexàmetres). Aquest gènere és típicament romà, creat per Gai Lucili al segle ii aC, i particularment propici a l'autoretrat: és sens dubte amb les sàtires que Horaci s'hi descriu millor. Es tracta de «xerrades» (sermons) en què es reivindica la llibertat d'expressió i la polèmica, sigui a propòsit de qüestions socials, ètiques, literàries, o fins polítiques. Però allò que era permès a Lucili sota la República no ho és, evidentment, en temps d'Horaci sota un règim despòtic. Epodes[modifica] Interior de la casa d'Horaci, Venosa Publicats en 29 aC, els Epodes són disset poemes, amb un total 625 versos, dels quals quatre són probablement apòcrifs (I, 5-6 i XVI, 15-16). Horaci no els anomenava epodes, sinó iàmbics, sent fidel a l'escola de Gai Valeri Catul, cosa que es guarda prou bé de proclamar, ja que Catul era maleït per Cèsar i els seus seguidors. Prefereix, de forma menys arriscada, reivindicar-se seguidor d'Arquíloc, inventor del gènere a Grècia -i que se n'havia servit com d'una arma temible contra els seus enemics, tant privats com públics. El to és el de la invectiva, l'estil és aspre i tens, i l'erotisme més cru pot acompanyar els accents més patriòtics. Com el seu nom indica (almenys en un dels seus sentits), els Epodes són escrits en dístics (un vers llarg + un vers curt) de tipus de versos iàmbics. Carmina[modifica] Carmina, publicades el 22 aC per als tres primers llibres; el 7 aC per al quart: encara que les dates tradicionalment més admeses oscil·len entre el 23 i el 12 aC, les Odes d'Horaci o Carmina són quatre llibres que contenen 38, 20, 30 i 15 peces, respectivament, és a dir, un total de 3.038 versos, dels quals n'hi ha sis que sens dubte són apòcrifs (IV, 6, 21-24 i IV, 8, 15-16). Horaci els comparava orgullosament a les piràmides d'Egipte, i és en efecte l'obra mestra absoluta de la lírica romana. Aquest monument reuneix tots els superlatius, combina totes les meravelles. D'entrada, constitueixen una proesa mètrica, amb la utilització de quatre tipus d'estrofes diferents, sis varietats de dístics, i tres espècies de versos utilitzats sols (kata stikhon). Miracle d'equilibri espontani, en una harmoniosa arquitectura que es desplega segons proporcions numèriques tan complexes com impecables. Prodigi de circulació també, d'interconnexions, de xarxes, de correspondències, combinacions i simetries diverses, del qual el conjunt constitueix una d'immensa i ultrasensible cambra de ressonància. Quant a la increïble virtuositat verbal que tria i emplaça cada paraula amb el màxim d'energia possible, n'hi ha prou amb dir que va impressionar Nietzsche en el grau més alt per allò que anomenava la seva «noblesa». Però on Horaci se supera, allà on es mereix el millor «llorer dèlfic» (Odes, III, 30), és en el domini del contingut. En aparença, res més heteròclit que les Odes, en què semblen interferir de manera aleatòria l'esfera privada i l'esfera pública, els amors i la política, el món grec i el món llatí, la mitologia més nuvolosa i l'actualitat més ardent, l'epicureisme empès fins al sibaritisme, i un estoïcisme esmolat fins a l'ascetisme i a un renunciament gairebé monacal avançat a l'època. I tanmateix, hi ha un director d'orquestra que domina tots aquests timbres i tots aquests instruments amb una batuta sobirana. Subterrània també, ja que la partició en aquesta enlluernadora simfonia, composta en honor de la llibertat humana de cara a la tirania política, no es desxifra més que a condició d'accedir al segon nivell de l'escriptura, fonamentat principalment en el control secret de la situació d'enunciació. El primer llibre (Carminum liber I) correspon a la joventut, de fantasia i d'inspiracions variades: composicions severes, èpiques o literàries es barregen amb unes altres de més joioses o d'invocació a Venus. En el segon llibre (Carminum liber II) hi ha una pausa per a la meditació, s'esmorteix l'impuls líric. S'hi tracta allò que ell demana a la vida pròpia. S'hi exposa el concepte d'aurea mediocritas; també es parla dels anys que passen (anni labuntur) i de l'otium (l'oci). Al tercer llibre (Carminum liber III) ens trobem amb un Horaci ja madur. Tanmateix, torna als vells temes. Epístoles[modifica] L'estàtua d'Horaci a Venosa (Publicades el 19 aC o 18 aC, més probablement que en la data més admesa (20 aC), i probablement després del 13 aC per al segon recull.) El primer recull de les Epístoles conté 20 peces (és a dir, 1.006 versos, dels quals set de la primera peça són probablement apòcrifs); i el segon recull consta de només dues peces, però molt llargues (270 i 216 versos). S'hi afegeix l'Epístola als pisons, més coneguda sota el nom d'Art poètica (476 versos). Són escrites en hexàmetres, com les Sàtires i, com aquestes, són converses d'aspecte lliure. Però sent les Epístoles cartes fictícies adreçades a persones ben precises, el to hi és menys viu i l'estil més distès. Sota aquesta tranquil·litzadora superfície, Horaci persegueix amb perseverança el seu combat, un combat en el qual l'amplitud i les peripècies, així com en les Odes, no es revelaran més que al lector atent en l'enunciació de la situació: s'ha tenir molt en compte no sols el destinatari (amic o enemic?), sinó també el locutor, que no és automàticament l'autor de l'escrit... La primera epístola del segon recull s'adreça així directament a August: o com agafar la cua del lleó sense que et mossegui. Juli Flor és el destinatari de la segona, en què Horaci diposita el seu testament espiritual i la quinta essència de la seva saviesa. Cant secular[modifica] Antecedents[modifica] El Cant secular està compost en un ritme eòlic: l'estrofa sàfica. Té una estructura pindàrica. Es tracta d'un cant per encàrrec, pràctica que ja trobem en els autors lírics grecs com ara el mateix Píndar, que en els seus Epinicis escrivia cants per encàrrec dedicats al vencedors dels jocs esportius. Objectius del cant d'encàrrec d'August[modifica] L'any 17 aC August va encarregar a Horaci la composició del Cant secular amb motiu de la celebració dels Ludi Tarentini, també anomenats jocs Seculars, que es van dur a terme durant el mes de maig del mateix any. August va decidir que fos Horaci qui compongués aquest cant pels elogis que el poeta havia fet a les intencions morals i religioses de l'emperador en el darrer llibre de les Odes. Tot i que Horaci no estava gaire d'acord a exaltar la figura d'August, va acceptar l'encàrrec en honor del seu company Virgili, el qual havia mort l'any 19 aC. Així, en el cant s'entreveu l'homenatge que fa a la figura de Virgili tot incloent la llegenda de Troia i Eneas. L'objectiu del cant era principalment recuperar les antigues tradicions alhora que s'exaltava el principat d'August. D'aquesta manera, el missatge del cant era d'agraïment als déus per la Pax Augusta i una severa exhortació a fomentar la veneració i devoció cap als déus a més d'establir una relació fluida entre l'estat i els déus. En aquesta obra, queda ben reflectida la filosofia que trobem en l'obra d'Horaci, així com podem entreveure la ideologia del principat d'August. El cant és un himne a Apol·lo i Diana, a més dels déus tutelars de Roma. Va ser compost amb la idea que fos cantat durant el tercer dia dels jocs per un cor de vint-i-set nois i el mateix nombre de noies, procedents de les millors famílies de Roma, els quals havien de ser verges i tenir el dos progenitors vius. A l'hora d'entonar-lo, un dels cors es va situar al cim del mont Palatí i l'altre al cim del mont Capitoli. Aquesta composició li va atorgar el títol de poeta llorejat. Edicions[modifica] Les edicions que tenim del text ens han arribat sempre compilades juntament amb les Odes. Actualment, trobem el Cant secular en les edicions següents: Bibliotheca scriptorum Graecorum et Romanorum Teubneriana editat per Fridericus Klingner Collection des Universités de France editat per F. Villeneuve. Loeb Classical Library editat per C. E. Bennett Scriptorum Classicorum Bibliotheca Oxoniensis editat per Eduardus C. Wickham Per altra banda, actualment hi ha dues edicions en línia, corresponents a The Latin Library[30] i Perseus.[31] Transmissió manuscrita[modifica] Tal com ja s'ha mencionat, la compilació del Cant secular ha anat lligada a la de les Odes. Per aquest motiu, per a la transmissió manuscrita, vegeu les Odes. Traduccions al català i castellà[modifica] Les traduccions del Cant secular es troben normalment editades juntament amb els quatre llibres d'Odes d'Horaci. En català, tan sols està traduïda per l'editorial Fundació Bernat Metge, a càrrec de Josep Vergès. En llengua castellana tenim dues edicions: Gredos, traduïda per José Luis Moralejo Universitat Autònoma Nacional de Mèxic, traduïda per Rubén Bonifaz Nuño. Traductors[modifica] Josep Vergés i Fàbregas Joan Sardà i Lloret Joaquim Garcia Girona Miguel Parera Cort Aquilino Iglesia Alvariño José Luis Moralejo Referències[modifica] ↑ Carm. II.4 ↑ Sat. II. 1, 35 ↑ Sat. I. 6, vv. 45-100 ↑ Ep. II. 1, 70 ↑ Ep. II. 7 ↑ Sat. I. 6, 48 ↑ Ep. XIII, 12-18 ↑ Carm. II. 6 ↑ Carm. I. 7, 10 ↑ Ep. VI, 13-14; VIII; X; XI ↑ Ep. II. 2, 51 ↑ Sat. I. 6 ↑ Carm. I. 17, 22 ↑ Carm.II. 6, 13, 16, 18 ↑ Carm.III. 1, 47-48 ↑ Carm. I, 14 ↑ 17,0 17,1 Carm.I. 8 ↑ Odes I, 17, 22; II, 6, 13, 16, 18 ↑ Oda I, 20 ↑ Oda I, 6 ↑ Odes I, 2; II, 12 ↑ Oda II, 1 ↑ 23,0 23,1 Oda I, 35 ↑ Oda I, 36; II, 11 ↑ 25,0 25,1 Oda I, 12 ↑ Oda I, 24, 28 ↑ Oda II, 10 ↑ 28,0 28,1 Enciclopèdia Espasa Volum núm. 18, 2a part, pàg. 2331 (ISBN 84-239-4581-2) ↑ Oda I, 3 ↑ «The Latin Library (Horaci)» (en anglès). [Consulta: 31 maig 2014]. ↑ «Perseus Collection (Greek and Roman Materials)» (en anglès). [Consulta: 31 maig 2014]. Bibliografia[modifica] Vida i obra d'Horaci[modifica] Alberte González, Antonio & Codoñer Merino, Carmen. Historia de la Literatura Latina. Càtedra, Madrid, 1997 Albrecht, Michael Von. Historia de la Literatura Romana: Desde Andronico Hasta Boecio. Herder, 1997 Bayet, Jean. Literatura Latina. Ariel, Barcelona 1966 CITRONI, M - CONSOLINO, F. E., LABATE, M., NARDUCCI, E., Letteratura di Roma Antica, Laterza, Roma-Bari 1997. Conte, Gian Biagio. Latin Literature: A History. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999 Harrison, S. J. A Companion to Latin Literature. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub. 2005 Traduccions en català[modifica] Joan Carbonell i Manils. Horaci: Epodes (en català). Barcelona: La Magrana, març de 2004. ISBN 84-8264-526-9 Edicions bilingües[modifica] Horacio (2008). Sátiras. Epístolas. Arte poética. Madrid: Editorial Gredos ISBN 978-84-249-3577-1 Horacio (2007). Odas. Canto Secular. Epodos. Madrid: Editorial Gredos ISBN 978-84-249-2879-7 Vergés, Josep. Q. Horaci Flac: Odes i Epodes. Fundació Bernat Metge: Barcelona, 1978-1981. Llorenç Riber. 'Q. Horaci Flac: Sàtires i Epístoles.' Fundació Bernat Metge: Barcelona, 1927. Edicions crítiques[modifica] D. R. Shackleton Bailey. Q. Horativs Flaccvs: Opera (en llatí). Monachii [etc.]: Saur, 2001. ISBN 3598712340 Vegeu també[modifica] Col·lecció Fundació Bernat Metge. Tòpics horacians. Gens Horàcia. Enllaços externs[modifica] En altres projectes de Wikimedia: Commons (Galeria) Commons (Categoria) Viquidites Viquitexts En anglès[modifica] Biography and chronology. Horace's works: text, concordances and frequency list. HORATIUS.NET Litweb. Poetry in Translation (Horace). Projecte Gutenberg (Horace & Horatio). Selected Poems of Horace. SORGLL: Horace, Odes I.22, read by Robert Sonkow. The Perseus Project — Latin and Greek authors (with English translations), including Horace. The works of Horace The Latin Library.com En francès[modifica] Espace Horace. Registres d'autoritat WorldCat CANTIC: a10101214 BNE: XX891549 BNF: cb11886570b GND: 118553569 LCCN: n79081354 VIAF: 100227522 ISNI: 0000 0001 2145 2178 SELIBR: 189659 SUDOC: 026659166 BIBSYS: 90055203 ULAN: 500404135 NLA: 35206138 NDL: 00540086 NKC: jn20000603003 RLS: 000083136 ICCU: IT\ICCU\CFIV\000246 Bases d'informació GEC: 0032926 Europeana: 60033 Viccionari Obtingut de «https://ca.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Horaci&oldid=25506396» Categories: Poetes satírics romans Persones de la província de Potenza Persones de la Basilicata Gens Horàcia Categories ocultes: Pàgines amb enllaç commonscat des de Wikidata Articles amb identificador CANTIC Articles amb identificador Europeana Control d'autoritats Menú de navegació Eines personals Sense sessió iniciada Discussió per aquest IP Contribucions Crea un compte Inicia la sessió Espais de noms Pàgina Discussió Variants Vistes Mostra Modifica Mostra l'historial Més Cerca Navegació Portada Article a l'atzar Articles de qualitat Comunitat Portal viquipedista Actes presencials Canvis recents La taverna Contacte Xat Donatius Ajuda Eines Què hi enllaça Canvis relacionats Pàgines especials Enllaç permanent Informació de la pàgina Citau aquest article Element a Wikidata Imprimeix/exporta Crear un llibre Baixa com a PDF Versió per a impressora En altres projectes Commons Viquidites Viquitexts En altres idiomes Afrikaans አማርኛ Aragonés العربية مصرى Asturianu تۆرکجه Башҡортса Žemaitėška Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ Български Brezhoneg Bosanski Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Zazaki Ελληνικά English Esperanto Español Eesti Euskara فارسی Suomi Võro Français Furlan Gaeilge Galego עברית हिन्दी Fiji Hindi Hrvatski Magyar Հայերեն Interlingua Bahasa Indonesia Ido Íslenska Italiano 日本語 ქართული Қазақша 한국어 Kurdî Kernowek Latina Lingua Franca Nova Lietuvių Latviešu Malagasy Македонски മലയാളം Монгол मराठी Bahasa Melayu Nāhuatl Nederlands Norsk nynorsk Norsk bokmål Occitan ਪੰਜਾਬੀ Polski Piemontèis Português Română Tarandíne Русский Sardu Sicilianu Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Simple English Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Seeltersk Svenska Kiswahili தமிழ் Tagalog Türkçe Татарча/tatarça Українська Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча Tiếng Việt Volapük Walon Winaray 吴语 中文 粵語 Modifica els enllaços La pàgina va ser modificada per darrera vegada el 25 nov 2020 a les 11:07. El text està disponible sota la Llicència de Creative Commons Reconeixement i Compartir-Igual; es poden aplicar termes addicionals. Vegeu les Condicions d'ús. Wikipedia® (Viquipèdia™) és una marca registrada de Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Política de privadesa Quant al projecte Viquipèdia Renúncies Versió per a mòbils Desenvolupadors Estadístiques Declaració de cookies ci-nii-ac-jp-6717 ---- CiNii Books Author - Horace CiNii menu search Articles Books Dissertations Sign Up Login Japanese Book & Journal Author Content Search Books and Journals Books Journals Advanced Search Title Exact Title Match Include Uniform Titles Author Include Alias Names Author ID Uniform Title ID Publisher ISBN ISSN NCID Subject Classification Note Format Any Formats Book and Journal Cartographic Material Braill Printed Music Manuscript Text Manuscript Map Manuscript Music Projected Graphic Microform Non-projected Graphic Motion Picture Musical Sound Recording Non-musical Sound Recording Videorecording Computer File 3D Artcraft or Naturally Occurring Object Kit Language Any Languages Japanese English German French Chinese Russian Spanish Italian Korean Arabic Year from to Library ID Organization ID Area Any Areas Hokkaido Tohoku Region Aomori Iwate Miyagi Akita Yamagata Fukushima Kanto Region Ibaraki Tochigi Gunma Saitama Chiba Tokyo Kanagawa Hokuriku/Koshinetsu Region Niigata Toyama Ishikawa Fukui Yamanashi Nagano Tokai Region Gifu Shizuoka Aichi Mie Kansai Region Shiga Kyoto Osaka Hyogo Nara Wakayama Chugoku/Shikoku Region Tottori Shimane Okayama Hiroshima Yamaguchi Tokushima Kagawa Ehime Kochi Kyushu/Okinawa Region Fukuoka Saga Nagasaki Kumamoto Oita Miyazaki Kagoshima Okinawa Asia Region Korea China Thailand Europe Region United Kingdom Germany Switzerland France Belgium Netherlands Sweden Norway North America Region United States of America Other Foreign Region Remember Lib. ID / Org. ID / Area Search Close Search Search Horace ID:DA00782980 Alias Name Horatius Flaccus, Quintus. 65-8 B.C. Horaz Orazio Gorat︠s︡iĭ Flakk, Kvint Horacjusz Horacy Flacco, Q. Orazio Flacco, Quinto Orazio Orazio Flacco, Q. Horats Horaṭiyos Horatiyus Flaccus, Quintus Horatius Gorat︠s︡īǐ ホラティウス(ホラティウス) ホラ-ティウス(ホラ-ティウス) 贺拉斯(ホラティウス) Horacio Search authors sharing the same name Search Results1-20 of 575 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 29 1 / 29 Select all: Open in New Windows Export to RefWorks Export to EndNote Show Refer/BiblX Show RIS Show BibTeX Show TSV Show 20 results Show 50 results Show 100 results Show 200 results Date (newest) Date (oldest) Number of Libraries (descending) Number of Libraries (ascending) Title (A-Z) Title (Z-A) Relevance 1 Das vierte Odenbuch des Horaz : Text und Übersetzung mit Einleitung und erklärenden Anmerkungen von Hans-Christian Günther Traugott Bautz 2019 Studia classica et mediaevalia Bd. 25 Available at 1 libraries 2 Canidia, Rome's first witch Maxwell Teitel Paule Bloomsbury Academic 2017 Bloomsbury classical studies monographs : hb Available at 1 libraries 3 書簡詩 ホラーティウス [著] ; 高橋宏幸訳 講談社 2017.11 講談社学術文庫 [2458] Available at 156 libraries 4 Odes book II Horace ; edited by Stephen Harrison Cambridge University Press 2017 Cambridge Greek and Latin classics : hardback , : pbk Available at 11 libraries 5 The William Morris manuscript of the Odes of Horace introduction, Clive Wilmer ; translation, W.E. Gladstone Bodleian Library 2016 : [set] , translation , facsimile Available at 2 libraries 6 Satiren und Briefe : Lateinisch und Deutsch Horaz ; Nach der Übersetzung von Otto Schönberger ; überarbeitet und mit Anmerkungen versehen von Friedemann Weitz WBG c2015 Edition Antike / herausgegeben von Thomas Baier, Kai Brodersen und Martin Hose Available at 1 libraries 7 The William Morris manuscript of the Odes of Horace commentary by Clive Wilmer ; translation by W.E. Gladstone Folio Society 2014 [Facsim.] , Commentary and translation Available at 2 libraries 8 Horace: the odes : Latin text, facing verse translation, and notes Colin Sydenham Bristol Classical Press 2012 : pbk. Available at 1 libraries 9 詩学 . 詩論 アリストテレース [著] ; 松本仁助, 岡道男訳 . ホラーティウス [著] ; 岡道男訳 岩波書店 2012.6 ワイド版岩波文庫 351 Available at 25 libraries 10 Odes, book I Horace ; edited by Roland Mayer Cambridge University Press 2012 Cambridge Greek and Latin classics : hbk , : pbk Available at 15 libraries 11 Satires, book I Horace ; edited by Emily Gowers Cambridge University Press 2012 Cambridge Greek and Latin classics : hardback , : pbk Available at 14 libraries 12 The "Ars poetica" C.O. Brink Cambridge University Press 2011 Horace on poetry / by C.O. Brink 2 : pbk Available at 3 libraries 13 Epistles book II : the letters to Augustus and Florus C.O. Brink Cambridge University Press 2011 Horace on poetry / by C.O. Brink 3 : pbk Available at 3 libraries 14 Prolegomena to the literary epistles C.O. Brink Cambridge University Press 2011 Horace on poetry / by C.O. Brink [1] : pbk Available at 2 libraries 15 Satires and epistles Horace ; translated by John Davie ; with an introduction and notes by Robert Cowan Oxford University Press 2011 Oxford world's classics Available at 2 libraries 16 Odes, book IV ; and Carmen saecvlare Horace ; edited by Richard F. Thomas Cambridge University Press 2011 Cambridge Greek and Latin classics : hbk , : pbk Available at 15 libraries 17 Oden und Epoden : Lateinisch und Deutsch Horaz ; Nach der Übersetzung von Will Richter ; überarbeitet und mit Anmerkungen vesehen von Friedemann Weitz WBG c2010 Edition Antike / herausgegeben von Thomas Baier, Kai Brodersen und Martin Hose Available at 1 libraries 18 美学三论 光明日报出版社 2009.7 西风译丛 第6辑 Available at 1 libraries 19 Tutte le poesie Orazio ; a cura di Paolo Fedeli ; traduzione di Carlo Carena G. Einaudi c2009 I millenni Available at 1 libraries 20 Opera Q. Horativs Flaccvs ; edidit D. R. Shackleton Bailey Walter de Gruyter 2008 Editio stereotypa, editionis qvartae (MMI) Bibliotheca scriptorum Graecorum et Romanorum Teubneriana 1234 : [pbk] Available at 1 libraries 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 29 1 / 29 Search this author VIAF KAKEN — Researchers J-GLOBAL researchmap Google Scholar Google Yahoo! JAPAN Related Authors Brink, C. O. Morris, William Wilmer, Clive Gladstone, W. E. (William Ewart) Aristotle Günther, Hans Christian Paule, Maxwell Teitel 高橋, 宏幸 Harrison, S. J. Schönberger, Otto Sydenham, Colin 松本, 仁助 岡, 道男 Mayer, R. (Roland) Gowers, Emily Davie, John N. Thomas, Richard F. Richter, Will Longinus, Cassius, ca. Fedeli, Paolo Carena, Carlo Bailey, D. R. Shackleton (David Roy Shackleton) Page Top Smart Phone | PC About CiNii About CiNii CiNii Incorporated Databases Terms of Use Contact NII Home Help CiNii Articles CiNii Books CiNii Dissertations Metadata and API News Updates RSS Twitter NII Scholarly Services KAKEN IRDB NII-REO commons-wikimedia-org-2856 ---- Category:Quintus Horatius Flaccus - Wikimedia Commons Help Category:Quintus Horatius Flaccus From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository Jump to navigation Jump to search English: Horace, (8 December 65 BC - 27 November 8 BC), was the leading lyric poet in Latin, the son of a freedman, but himself born free. Latina: Quintus Horatius Flaccus Horacio (es); Quintus Horatius Flaccus (nah); Horatius (ms); Horace (en-gb); Horace (kw); Хораций (bg); Quintus Horatius Flaccus (ro); Horace (mg); Horatius (sk); Horace (oc); 贺拉斯 (zh-hant); Horatius (io); Quinto Orazio Flacco (sc); Goratsiy (uz); Гораций (kk); Horacio (eo); Quintus Horatius Flaccus (cs); Horacije (bs); Horacio (an); Horace (fr); Horacije (hr); होरेस (mr); Horace (vi); Horācijs (lv); Huoracėjos (sgs); Хорације (sr); Horácio (pt-br); Horace (sco); Гораций (mn); Horats (nn); Quintus Horatius Flaccus (nb); Horatsi (az); Horace (hif); Horatius (vro); Horace (en-ca); Οράτιος (el); Horace (en); هوراس (ar); Quintus Horatius Flaccus (br); Гораций (ru); Горацій (uk); 賀拉斯 (yue); Quintus Horatius Flaccus (hu); Horace (am); Horaci (sq); Horazio (eu); Хорациј (mk); Horacio (ast); هوراس (azb); Гораций (ba); Horaz (de); هوراس (fa); Гарацый (be); Հորացիուս (hy); 贺拉斯 (zh); Horats (da); ჰორაციუსი (ka); ホラティウス (ja); Quinto Horatio Flacco (ia); Horatius (sv); هوراتيوس (arz); Horatius (nl); הורטיוס (he); Quintus Horatius Flaccus (la); Quinde Orazio Flacco (roa-tara); होरेस (hi); 贺拉斯 (wuu); ਹੋਰੇਸ (pa); Horace (wa); Horatio (lfn); Horacy (pl); ஓராசு (ta); Quinto Orazio Flacco (it); Horatius (id); Horas (cy); Horatius (diq); Гарацыюс (be-tarask); Horaci (ca); 贺拉斯 (zh-cn); Horacio (war); Horaz (de-ch); Hóratíus (is); Quintu Orazziu Flaccu (scn); Horácio (pt); Horatius (vo); Гораций (tt); Horatius (tr); Horacijus (lt); Horacij (sl); Horace (tl); Horatius (et); Horatius (ga); Orazi (fur); Horatius (sw); ഹൊറസ് (ml); Kvint Horacije Flak (sh); Orassi (pms); Horatius (fi); Quintus Horatius Flaccus (ku); Quintus Horatius Flaccus (stq); Horacio (gl); 호라티우스 (ko); 贺拉斯 (zh-hans); Horatius (af) poeta romano (it); poète lyrique latin (fr); Erromatar poeta (eu); римский поэт (ru); poeta lírico e satírico en lingua latina (gl); römischer Dichter (de); Ρωμαίος λυρικός ποιητής (el); старажытнарымскі пісьменнік (be); شاعر و نویسنده در روم باستان (fa); poeta lyric de Roma antique (ia); romersk skribent og poet (da); Roman şair. (tr); romersk skribent og poet (nn); poeta lírico e satírico em língua latina (pt-br); romersk skribent og poet (nb); romersk författare och poet (sv); rzymski poeta liryczny (pl); римський поет (uk); dichter uit Oude Rome (65v Chr-8v Chr) (nl); poeta lírico y satírico en lengua latina (es); משורר רומי (he); poeta líric i satíric llatí (ca); antiikin roomalainen runoilija (fi); Roman lyric poet (en); شاعر غنائي و ناقد أدبي لاتيني روماني. (ar); římský básník (cs); poet roman din „perioada de aur” a literaturii romane (ro) Quinto Horacio Flaco (es); Квінт Горацій Флакк (uk); Horatius, Horatius Poeta (la); Quintus Horatius Flaccus (diq); Квинт Гораций Флакк (ru); Horatius, Quintus Horatius Flaccus (de); Quintus Horatius Flaccus, Q. Horatius Flaccus, Horatius (en); Quintus Horatius Flaccus (gl); Quintus Horatius Flaccus, Quint Horaci Flac (ca); Kwintus Horacjusz Flakkus, Orazio, Horace, Horacius (cs); Orazio (it) Horace  Roman lyric poet هوراس كما تخيله الرسام أنتون ألكساندر فون فرن Upload media   Wikipedia   Wikiquote   Wikisource Name in native language Q. Horatius Flaccus Date of birth 8 December 65 BC Venosa Date of death 27 November 8 BC Rome Place of burial Rome Country of citizenship Ancient Rome Occupation poet writer philosopher Father Unknown Mother Unknown Work location Rome Notable work Ars Poetica Present in work The Divine Comedy (4) Authority control  Q6197 ISNI: 0000 0001 2145 2178 VIAF ID: 100227522 GND ID: 118553569 Library of Congress authority ID: n79081354 Union List of Artist Names ID: 500404135 Bibliothèque nationale de France ID: 11886570b IdRef ID: 026659166 CiNii author ID (books): DA00782980 National Diet Library ID: 00540086 SBN author ID: IT\ICCU\CFIV\000246 Libraries Australia ID: 35206138 MusicBrainz artist ID: af616f1f-6242-4802-a1bf-8d3f0647083c Open Library ID: OL20088A NKCR AUT ID: jn20000603003 SELIBR ID: 189659 RSL ID (person): 000083136 National Library of Israel ID: 000064806 Biblioteca Nacional de España ID: XX891549 Nationale Thesaurus voor Auteurs ID: 068304579 BIBSYS ID: 90055203 NLP ID (unique): A11793144 National Library of Korea ID: KAC199612791 Europeana entity: agent/base/60033 Reasonator PetScan Scholia Statistics OpenStreetMap Locator tool Search depicted Subcategories This category has the following 15 subcategories, out of 15 total. B ► Books about Quintus Horatius Flaccus‎ (6 C, 6 F) ► Books by Quintus Horatius Flaccus‎ (3 C, 21 F) C ► Carpe diem‎ (8 C, 38 F) E ► Exegi monumentum‎ (1 F) H ► Horace's home in Venosa‎ (14 F) ► Horace portrait medallion, Leeds Central Library‎ (4 F) I ► Ille terrarum mihi praeter omnes angulus ridet‎ (7 F) J ► Les Jardins d'Horace, cliché-verre by Jean-Baptiste-Camille Corot‎ (11 F) N ► Nescit vox missa reverti‎ (2 F) ► Non omnis moriar‎ (9 F) O ► Odes and Carmen saeculare of Horace - Conington (1872)‎ (20 F) P ► Pulvis et umbra sumus‎ (7 F) S ► Wieland, Horazens Satyren (1786)‎ (4 F) ► Satires, Epistles and Art of Poetry of Horace - Conington (1874)‎ (52 F) ► Quintus Horatius Flaccus on stamps‎ (7 F) Pages in category "Quintus Horatius Flaccus" The following 3 pages are in this category, out of 3 total. Quintus Horatius Flaccus H Creator:Horace Q Creator:Quintus Horatius Flaccus Media in category "Quintus Horatius Flaccus" The following 135 files are in this category, out of 135 total. 345Horace and Lydia by Albert Edelfelt (1854-1905).jpg 512 × 506; 60 KB A day in ancient Rome; being a revision of Lohr's "Aus dem alten Rom", with numerous illustrations, by Edgar S. Shumway (1885) (14591826269).jpg 1,102 × 1,882; 557 KB Adalbert von Rössler Horaz.jpg 604 × 1,000; 441 KB Bodleian Libraries, Ticket for Carmen Seculare (Friday 5th March 1779).jpg 770 × 1,000; 163 KB Busto di Orazio, Potenza.jpg 1,200 × 1,600; 177 KB Cincinnati Convention Mountain of Horace.png 405 × 599; 185 KB Classical writers windows, Hill Bark.jpg 4,220 × 2,228; 6.49 MB Como - Collegio Gallio 0965.JPG 6,000 × 4,000; 10.98 MB Como - Collegio Gallio 0986.JPG 6,000 × 4,000; 10.59 MB Epigrafe riapertura del Liceo Flacco.jpg 1,200 × 1,600; 111 KB Epístola als Pisons (page 30 crop).jpg 484 × 512; 48 KB Fedor Bronnikov 014.jpg 1,000 × 569; 135 KB Fons bandusiae.JPG 960 × 1,436; 294 KB General biography; or, Lives, critical and historical, of the most eminent persons of all ages, countries, conditions, and professions, arranged according to alphabetical order (1818) (14598071047).jpg 1,744 × 2,066; 743 KB Horace 1517 title page.jpg 1,666 × 2,431; 949 KB Horace and Susan Henry home, Seattle, circa 1900 (MOHAI 9648).jpg 700 × 446; 66 KB Horace Odes etc tr Conington (1872) - Capital I type 2.jpg 144 × 145; 6 KB Horace Odes etc tr Conington (1872) - Capital M.jpg 175 × 174; 8 KB Horace Odes etc tr Conington (1872) - Capital T type 2.jpg 150 × 150; 6 KB Horace Odes etc tr Conington (1872) - Capital Y.jpg 150 × 148; 6 KB Horace Odes etc tr Conington (1872) - endpiece from half title.jpg 157 × 59; 3 KB Horace Odes etc tr Conington (1872) - endpiece page 103.jpg 296 × 293; 18 KB Horace Odes etc tr Conington (1872) - endpiece page 127.jpg 257 × 211; 8 KB Horace Odes etc tr Conington (1872) - endpiece page xxxvi.jpg 271 × 320; 24 KB Horace Odes etc tr Conington (1872) - endpiece page xxxvii.jpg 151 × 142; 4 KB Horace Odes etc tr Conington (1872) - headpiece from half title-2.jpg 461 × 63; 8 KB Horace Odes etc tr Conington (1872) - headpiece from half title.jpg 388 × 66; 7 KB Horace Odes etc tr Conington (1872) - headpiece from page 1.jpg 705 × 185; 36 KB Horace Odes etc tr Conington (1872) - headpiece from page 104.jpg 722 × 160; 28 KB Horace Odes etc tr Conington (1872) - headpiece from page 63.jpg 703 × 164; 27 KB Horace Odes etc tr Conington (1872) - headpiece from page vii.jpg 634 × 163; 25 KB Horace Odes etc tr Conington (1872) - headpiece from page xxxv.jpg 705 × 194; 31 KB Horace Odes etc tr Conington (1872) - headpiece from page xxxvii.jpg 635 × 162; 25 KB Horace Odes etc tr Conington (1872) - logo from title page.jpg 269 × 351; 37 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - Capital A type 2.jpg 144 × 148; 14 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - Capital C type 2.jpg 140 × 144; 13 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - Capital D type 2.jpg 141 × 141; 14 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - Capital F type 2.jpg 137 × 144; 13 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - Capital G type 2.jpg 142 × 141; 14 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - Capital H type 2.jpg 143 × 143; 13 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - Capital H type1.jpg 197 × 197; 15 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - Capital I type 1.jpg 196 × 202; 15 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - Capital I type 2.jpg 137 × 140; 13 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - Capital L type 2.jpg 138 × 145; 13 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - Capital N type 2.jpg 143 × 145; 14 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - Capital O type 2.jpg 137 × 139; 13 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - Capital S type 1.jpg 202 × 198; 34 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - Capital S type 2.jpg 144 × 143; 11 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - Capital T type 1.jpg 194 × 202; 19 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - Capital T type 2.jpg 144 × 145; 14 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - Capital W type 2.jpg 147 × 148; 14 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - Capital Y type 2.jpg 142 × 147; 14 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - head piece of Preface.jpg 785 × 213; 68 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - headpiece from half title page.jpg 435 × 79; 17 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - headpiece from page 1.jpg 812 × 219; 74 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - headpiece from page 43.jpg 793 × 174; 60 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - headpiece from page 97.jpg 772 × 181; 111 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - tailpiece from page 105.jpg 179 × 71; 5 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - tailpiece from page 107.jpg 123 × 55; 3 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - tailpiece from page 108.jpg 123 × 43; 3 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - tailpiece from page 110.jpg 129 × 55; 3 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - tailpiece from page 113.jpg 183 × 84; 5 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - tailpiece from page 119.jpg 191 × 68; 5 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - tailpiece from page 120.jpg 123 × 65; 4 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - tailpiece from page 122.jpg 191 × 72; 6 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - tailpiece from page 126.jpg 179 × 73; 6 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - tailpiece from page 130.jpg 230 × 58; 5 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - tailpiece from page 132.jpg 154 × 55; 3 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - tailpiece from page 136.jpg 186 × 69; 5 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - tailpiece from page 139.jpg 180 × 87; 5 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - tailpiece from page 146.jpg 186 × 190; 17 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - tailpiece from page 148.jpg 186 × 177; 12 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - tailpiece from page 170.jpg 196 × 179; 11 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - tailpiece from page 20.jpg 225 × 131; 10 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - tailpiece from page 25.jpg 152 × 164; 10 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - tailpiece from page 33.jpg 205 × 83; 7 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - tailpiece from page 42.jpg 232 × 247; 20 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - tailpiece from page 6.jpg 214 × 90; 6 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - tailpiece from page 70.jpg 223 × 195; 14 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - tailpiece from page 75.jpg 168 × 46; 5 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - tailpiece from page 80.jpg 186 × 74; 7 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - tailpiece from page 86.jpg 145 × 70; 4 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - tailpiece from page 95.jpg 254 × 306; 23 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - tailpiece from page 96.jpg 327 × 506; 42 KB Horace Satires etc tr Conington (1874) - tailpiece title page.jpg 412 × 211; 31 KB Horace, Odes, Florence, Plut. 34.1.jpg 2,174 × 3,077; 2.12 MB Horace, Virgil and Varius at the house of Maecenas.jpg 700 × 560; 114 KB Horace.jpg 3,072 × 2,304; 3.1 MB Horace; the satires (IA horacesatires00hor).pdf 877 × 1,295, 98 pages; 5.35 MB Horacianas - Horacio (trad. Bartolomé Mitre).pdf 601 × 882, 216 pages; 86.26 MB Horacio (detalle) - Rebeca Matte.jpg 332 × 500; 53 KB HORACIO MBA.jpg 2,430 × 3,240; 717 KB Horacy - domniemany portret.jpg 727 × 914; 527 KB Horatius - Boek I Ode XIV - Cleveringaplaats 1, Leiden.JPG 1,952 × 2,576; 1.09 MB Horatius - Opera.jpg 3,264 × 4,912; 4 MB Horatius Flaccus.jpg 956 × 1,680; 1.13 MB Horaz beim Studium.jpg 2,707 × 1,885; 3.36 MB Horaz, Karl Georg Neumann Ode II 6.jpg 954 × 613; 242 KB Monte Vulture near Venosa.jpg 2,592 × 1,944; 1.11 MB Odes and Carmen Saeculare.djvu 912 × 1,500, 192 pages; 20.9 MB Opera (IA oper00hor).pdf 864 × 1,162, 360 pages; 20.29 MB Opera (IA oper00hora).pdf 604 × 904, 336 pages; 17.53 MB Opera MET DP254717.jpg 2,550 × 3,881; 1.24 MB Opera MET DP254718.jpg 2,713 × 3,881; 1.44 MB Opera ad examplar recensionis Bentleianæ plerumque emendata et brevibus notis instructa (IA operaadexamplarr00hora).pdf 602 × 947, 546 pages; 35.74 MB Opera. Ad optima exemplaria recognovit et in usum scholarum edidit Georg Ænotheus Koch (IA operaadoptimaexe00hora).pdf 687 × 1,254, 262 pages; 17.6 MB Opera cum notis gallicis.. (IA operacumnotisgal00hora).pdf 581 × 962, 292 pages; 18.67 MB Opera omnia, ex recensione A. J. Macleane (IA operaomniaexrece00hora).pdf 600 × 945, 252 pages; 14.85 MB Oppineimpain tutkittaa.png 1,650 × 640; 7 KB Orazio (xilografia).jpg 1,235 × 2,523; 1.45 MB Orazio, opera, francia xi secolo (pluteo 34.1).jpg 2,802 × 2,166; 3.69 MB Piazza con statua di Orazio.jpg 1,162 × 1,333; 713 KB Poets; twenty portraits. Engraving by J.W. Cook, 1825. Wellcome V0006822.jpg 2,397 × 3,240; 3.46 MB Poëmata .. (IA pomata00hora).pdf 762 × 1,333, 1,098 pages; 104.62 MB Q. Horatius Flaccus, denuo recognovit et praefatus est Augustus Meineke (IA qhoratiusflaccus00hor).pdf 689 × 1,100, 284 pages; 12.11 MB Quinti Horatii Flacci opera (IA quintihoratiifla02hora).pdf 850 × 1,404, 250 pages; 13.47 MB Quinto Orazio Flacco.jpg 454 × 600; 43 KB Quintus Horatius Flaccus.jpg 412 × 821; 316 KB QuintusHoratiusFlaccusLeidenWallPoem.jpg 2,464 × 3,696; 2.03 MB Richard Bentley, Horace 1711.jpg 960 × 246; 38 KB Ritratto di Orazio Flacco crop.png 1,185 × 1,485; 3.5 MB Ritratto di Orazio Flacco.jpg 1,944 × 2,592; 1.21 MB Statua di Orazio.jpg 1,944 × 2,592; 2.52 MB Statue d'Horace.jpg 203 × 332; 14 KB Venosa Città di Orazio.jpg 2,533 × 1,901; 416 KB Venosa Piazza di Orazio.jpg 2,119 × 1,415; 1.57 MB Venosa Piazza Orazio - statua.jpg 1,415 × 2,119; 1.96 MB Venosa Quote by Horace.jpg 2,536 × 1,902; 725 KB Venosa Statua di Orazio.jpg 1,415 × 2,119; 1.3 MB Volvic.Horace1.JPG 4,000 × 3,000; 2.11 MB Volvic.Horace2.JPG 4,000 × 3,000; 3.37 MB Wenceslas Hollar - Moderation (State 1).jpg 1,665 × 2,382; 1.36 MB Wybf3r poezji-2.png 1,069 × 1,558; 2.6 MB Wybf3r poezji-7.png 703 × 694; 796 KB Горацій.Вікіджерела.png 500 × 500; 440 KB Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Quintus_Horatius_Flaccus&oldid=351980138" Categories: 65 BC births 8 BC deaths Ancient Roman poets Gens Horatia People of Venosa Non-topical/index: Uses of Wikidata Infobox Uses of Wikidata Infobox providing interwiki links Deceased people by name Uses of Wikidata Infobox with no family name Uses of Wikidata Infobox with no given name Men by name People by name Navigation menu Personal tools English Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Category Discussion Variants Views View Edit History More Search Navigate Main page Welcome Community portal Village pump Help center Participate Upload file Recent changes Latest files Random file Contact us Tools What links here Related changes Special pages Permanent link Page information Wikidata item Print/export Create a book Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikipedia In Wikipedia Afrikaans አማርኛ Aragonés العربية مصرى Asturianu تۆرکجه Башҡортса Žemaitėška Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ Български Brezhoneg Bosanski Català Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Zazaki Ελληνικά English Esperanto Español Eesti Euskara فارسی Suomi Võro Français Furlan Gaeilge Galego עברית हिन्दी Fiji Hindi Hrvatski Magyar Հայերեն Interlingua Bahasa Indonesia Ido Íslenska Italiano 日本語 ქართული Қазақша 한국어 Kurdî Kernowek Latina Lingua Franca Nova Lietuvių Latviešu Malagasy Македонски മലയാളം Монгол मराठी Bahasa Melayu Nāhuatl Nederlands Norsk nynorsk Norsk Occitan ਪੰਜਾਬੀ Polski Piemontèis Português Română Tarandíne Русский Sardu Sicilianu Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Seeltersk Svenska Kiswahili தமிழ் Tagalog Türkçe Татарча/tatarça Українська Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча Tiếng Việt Volapük Walon Winaray 吴语 中文 粵語 Edit links This page was last edited on 26 May 2019, at 23:15. Files are available under licenses specified on their description page. All structured data from the file and property namespaces is available under the Creative Commons CC0 License; all unstructured text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and the Privacy Policy. Privacy policy About Wikimedia Commons Disclaimers Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement cs-wikipedia-org-5161 ---- Quintus Horatius Flaccus – Wikipedie Quintus Horatius Flaccus Z Wikipedie, otevřené encyklopedie Skočit na navigaci Skočit na vyhledávání Quintus Horatius Flaccus Narození 8. prosince 65 př. n. l. Venosa Úmrtí 27. listopadu 8 př. n. l. (ve věku 56 let) Řím Místo pohřbení Řím Povolání básník, spisovatel a filozof Národnost Římané Významná díla Ars Poetica Rodiče a multimediální obsah na Commons galerie na Commons původní texty na Wikizdrojích citáty na Wikicitátech Seznam děl v Souborném katalogu ČR Některá data mohou pocházet z datové položky. Quintus Horatius Flaccus, často zvaný jen Horatius (8. prosince 65 př. n. l. Venusia – 27. listopadu 8 př. n. l. Řím) byl římský básník tzv. zlatého věku římské poezie.[1] Působil za vlády císaře Octaviana Augusta a patřil k družině básníků Gaia Cilnia Maecenata. Obsah 1 Život 2 Dílo 2.1 Osudy Horatiova díla 3 České překlady 4 Odkazy 4.1 Reference 4.2 Literatura 4.3 Související články 4.4 Externí odkazy Život[editovat | editovat zdroj] Horatius byl synem propuštěnce (zřejmě bývalého státního otroka) z Venusie na jihu Itálie (dnešní Venosa). Ačkoli byl jeho otec nízkého původu, byl natolik majetný, že byl schopen synovi zajistit nejlepší vzdělání, nejprve ve Venusii, později v Římě. Roku 45 př. n. l. odešel Horatius studovat filosofii do Athén, jak bylo zvykem u mladíků z dobrých rodin, aby se ve studiu zdokonalil.[2] Jeho studentská kariéra byla ale narušena, když v roce 44 př. n. l. vstoupil do Brutovy republikánské armády, kde se stal vojenským tribunem. Roku 42 př. n. l. se účastnil bitvy u Filipp, kde byl Brutus poražen vojsky druhého triumvirátu. Horatius se zachránil útěkem a později o sobě řekl, že v bitvě zanechal svůj štít, což bylo častým motivem u básníků řecké mélické poezie (např. u Archilocha). Po amnestii, jejíž podmínkou byla konfiskace majetku, se vrátil do Itálie a byl nucen živit se jako písař. V této době vznikly jeho první básně. Dostal se do kontaktu s básníky a literáty (spřátelil se například s Vergiliem a Variem) a roku 38 př. n. l. se jejich prostřednictvím seznámil s Gaiem Cilniem Maecenatem, který mu pomohl s vydáním prvních knih a později mu daroval statek. Ten ho ekonomicky zajistil a mohl se tak věnovat už pouze psaní. Maecenas ho představil také císaři Augustovi, s nímž měl Horatius dosti úzké vztahy, přestože se v mládí účastnil bojů proti němu. Tyto vztahy byly založeny na upřímné oddanosti, ne však podlézavosti nebo osobních ambicích básníka. Například když ho císař požádal, aby se stal jeho osobním tajemníkem, Horatius nabídku zdvořile, ale rozhodně odmítl. Celý život si zachoval relativní svobodu a nezávislost a oslava Augusta v některých jeho básních neplynula z poddanosti, ale upřímného souhlasu s císařovou politikou. Horatius zemřel necelé dva měsíce po Maecenatovi a byl vedle něj pohřben na Esquilinu. Dílo[editovat | editovat zdroj] Saturae (Satiry, I. kniha 34 př. n. l., II. 33 př. n. l.): 2 knihy (o 10 a 8 skladbách) v daktylském hexametru. Ačkoli zde Horatius navázal na Lucilia, jeho satiry nemají útočný charakter, jedná se spíše o moralizující kritiky soudobé společnosti a lidských vlastností (například cizoložství, lakomství, nenasytnosti, chamtivosti, obžerství). Epodae (Epódy nebo též Jamby, 30 př. n. l.): 17 básnických skladeb, které sám Horatius nazýval Iambi s ohledem na metrum, jež v díle převažuje, a zároveň vzhledem k jejich útočnému tónu, který byl spojován s řeckou jambickou poezií. Sbírka je charakteristická námětovou pestrostí, obsahuje básně útočné, erotické i občanské. Carmina (Ódy, 3 knihy, 23 př. n. l., IV. kniha 13 př. n. l.): přes 100 básní různých námětů, délky a meter. Horatius zde představuje množství řeckých lyrických meter do té doby v latinské poezie neužívaných, básně jsou seřazeny podle vzoru alexandrijské neoterické poezie a vyznačují se vysokou učeností a propracovaností. Carmen saeculare (Píseň stoletní, 17 př. n. l.): báseň složená na Augustův podnět ku příležitosti oslavy století. Jedná se o hymnus pro 27 dívek a 27 hochů. Je to prosba k bohům, aby zajistili Římu a Augustově vládě prosperitu. Epistulae (Listy) (20 př. n. l.): 22 skladeb v hexametrech. Každý list je adresován konkrétní osobě a neomezuje se na jeden námět a téma, podle vzoru neoterické poezie se snaží o námětovou pestrost.. De arte poetica (O umění básnickém, po roce 13 př. n. l.): skladba (jinak také nazývána Epistula ad Pisones nebo jen Ad Pisones) podává základy teorií o poezii, především o tvorbě dramatické. Zabývá se postupně uměním a jeho tvůrci. Jedná se zřejmě o Horativo nejznámější dílo. Osudy Horatiova díla[editovat | editovat zdroj] Nedlouho po své smrti se Horatius stal římským školním autorem. Ve středověku byl dobře znám především jako básník moralizující, z jehož díla bylo možné čerpat mnohá ponaučení. Četly se především Listy a Satiry. Na jeho proslulost a postavení ve školní tradici ukazuje i Božská komedie, kde se Horatius nachází mezi básníky v předpeklí. Jako lyrik byl oslavován a imitován už od renesance (počínaje Petrarcou) zejména u francouzských básníků. Nepostradatelným vzorem klasicistní literatury byla skladba De arte poetica, na níž se odkazovalo v poetice a literatuře. Největší oblibě se Horatius těšil zřejmě v 18. století. Vliv měl nepochybně také na českou poezii, v období národního obrození ho například jako jeden z antických vzorů použil Antonín Jaroslav Puchmajer. České překlady[editovat | editovat zdroj] HORATIUS, Quintus Flaccus. Ódy a epódy. Překlad Otakar Jiráni. Královské Vinohrady: Ludvík Bradáč, 1923. 276 s. Dostupné online.  HORATIUS, Quintus Flaccus. Satiry. [Kniha I a II]. Překlad Otakar Jiráni. V Praze: Alois Srdce, 1929. 118 s. HORATIUS, Quintus Flaccus. Listy. Překlad Otakar Jiráni. V Praze: Alois Srdce, 1929. 121 s. HORATIUS, Quintus Flaccus. Vavřín a réva: ódy, epódy, satiry, listy. Překlad Jindřich Pokorný a Rudolf Mertlík. Odeon, Praha 1972. 365 s. Odkazy[editovat | editovat zdroj] Reference[editovat | editovat zdroj] ↑ Zlatý věk římské poezie. www.fhs.cuni.cz [online]. [cit. 2020-06-29]. Dostupné online.  ↑ Horace | Roman poet. Encyclopedia Britannica [online]. [cit. 2020-06-29]. Dostupné online. (anglicky)  Literatura[editovat | editovat zdroj] CONTE, G. B. Dějiny římské literatury. KLP, Praha 2008, s. 278-301 Slovník latinských spisovatelů, LEDA, Praha 2004, s. 297-300 STIEBITZ, Ferdinand. Stručné dějiny římské literatury. Pedagogické nakladatelství, Praha 1967, s. 229-238 Související články[editovat | editovat zdroj] Carpe diem Odi profanum vulgus, et arceo Sapere aude Externí odkazy[editovat | editovat zdroj] Obrázky, zvuky či videa k tématu Quintus Horatius Flaccus ve Wikimedia Commons Osoba Quintus Horatius Flaccus ve Wikicitátech Seznam děl v Souborném katalogu ČR, jejichž autorem nebo tématem je Quintus Horatius Flaccus Digitalizovaná díla Quinta Horatia Flacca v digitální knihovně Kramerius NK ČR. Horatius, Quintus Flaccus: Epistola ad Pisones De arte poetica ad plures editiones collata, atque in partes et capita divisa, cum praecipuis lectionis varietatibus Dostupné online Autoritní data: AUT: jn20000603003 | GND: 118553569 | ISNI: 0000 0001 2145 2178 | LCCN: n79081354 | ULAN: 500404135 | VIAF: 100227522 | WorldcatID: lccn-n79081354 Portály: Antika | Lidé | Literatura Citováno z „https://cs.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Quintus_Horatius_Flaccus&oldid=19002440“ Kategorie: Starověcí římští básníci Básníci tvořící latinsky Spisovatelé píšící latinsky Narození 65 př. n. l. Narození 8. prosince Úmrtí 8 př. n. l. Úmrtí 27. listopadu Úmrtí v Římě Skryté kategorie: Monitoring:Články s odkazem na autoritní záznam Monitoring:Články s autoritní kontrolou Muži Navigační menu Osobní nástroje Nejste přihlášen(a) Diskuse Příspěvky Vytvoření účtu Přihlášení Jmenné prostory Článek Diskuse Varianty Zobrazení Číst Editovat Editovat zdroj Zobrazit historii Více Hledání Navigace Hlavní strana Nápověda Potřebuji pomoc Nejlepší články Náhodný článek Poslední změny Komunitní portál Pod lípou Podpořte Wikipedii Nástroje Odkazuje sem Související změny Načíst soubor Speciální stránky Trvalý odkaz Informace o stránce Citovat stránku Položka Wikidat Tisk/export Vytvořit knihu Stáhnout jako PDF Verze k tisku Na jiných projektech Wikimedia Commons Wikicitáty Wikizdroje V jiných jazycích Afrikaans አማርኛ Aragonés العربية مصرى Asturianu تۆرکجه Башҡортса Žemaitėška Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ Български Brezhoneg Bosanski Català Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Zazaki Ελληνικά English Esperanto Español Eesti Euskara فارسی Suomi Võro Français Furlan Gaeilge Galego עברית हिन्दी Fiji Hindi Hrvatski Magyar Հայերեն Interlingua Bahasa Indonesia Ido Íslenska Italiano 日本語 ქართული Қазақша 한국어 Kurdî Kernowek Latina Lingua Franca Nova Lietuvių Latviešu Malagasy Македонски മലയാളം Монгол मराठी Bahasa Melayu Nāhuatl Nederlands Norsk nynorsk Norsk bokmål Occitan ਪੰਜਾਬੀ Polski Piemontèis Português Română Tarandíne Русский Sardu Sicilianu Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Simple English Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Seeltersk Svenska Kiswahili தமிழ் Tagalog Türkçe Татарча/tatarça Українська Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча Tiếng Việt Volapük Walon Winaray 吴语 中文 粵語 Upravit odkazy Stránka byla naposledy editována 17. 9. 2020 v 09:12. Text je dostupný pod licencí Creative Commons Uveďte autora – Zachovejte licenci, případně za dalších podmínek. Podrobnosti naleznete na stránce Podmínky užití. Ochrana osobních údajů O Wikipedii Vyloučení odpovědnosti Kontaktujte Wikipedii Mobilní verze Vývojáři Statistiky Prohlášení o cookies cy-wikipedia-org-2693 ---- Horas - Wicipedia Horas Oddi ar Wicipedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Horas Ganwyd 8 Rhagfyr 0065 CC  Venosa  Bu farw Rhufain  Dinasyddiaeth Rhufain hynafol  Galwedigaeth bardd, ysgrifennwr, athronydd  Adnabyddus am Ars Poetica  Tad Unknown  Mam Unknown  Bardd yn yr iaith Lladin oedd Quintus Horatius Flaccus neu Horas, hefyd Horace (8 Rhagfyr, 65 CC - 27 Tachwedd 8 CC). Gyda Cicero, Ofydd ac eraill, roedd yn un o lenorion mawr yr Oes Awgwstaidd. Cynnwys 1 Ei waith 2 Llyfryddiaeth 2.1 Gwaith Horas 2.2 Cyfieithiadau ac astudiaethau 3 Cyfeiriadau Ei waith[golygu | golygu cod y dudalen] Un o'i gerddi enwocaf yw ei gerdd ar Fyrhoedledd Dyn, sy'n dechrau gyda'r bennill adnabyddus, Eheu fugaces, Postume, Postume, labuntur anni nec pietas moram rugis et instanti senectae afferet indominataeque morti. (Ebrwydd, O Postumus, ebrwydd y derfydd Blwyddi ein heinioes : nid etyl dy grefydd Ddynesiad henaint hagr ei rychau, Nac anorchfygol rymuster angau.)[1] Llyfryddiaeth[golygu | golygu cod y dudalen] Saturae, 1577 Gwaith Horas[golygu | golygu cod y dudalen] Ars Poetica Carmen Saeculare Carminum llyfr #1 [1] Carminum llyfr #2 [2] Carminum llyfr #3 [3] Carminum llyfr #4 [4] Epistularum llyfr #1 [5] Epistularum llyfr #2 [6] Epodes [7] Sermonum llyfr #1 [8] Sermonum llyfr #2 [9] Cyfieithiadau ac astudiaethau[golygu | golygu cod y dudalen] J. Gwyn Griffiths (gol.), Cerddi o'r Lladin (Gwasg Prifysgol Cymru, 1962). Yn cynnwys detholiad o gerddi Horas. Cyfeiriadau[golygu | golygu cod y dudalen] ↑ Cyfieithiad H. Parry Jones yn Cerddi o'r Lladin (Caerdydd, 1962). Awdurdod WorldCat VIAF: 100227522 LCCN: n79081354 ISNI: 0000 0001 2145 2178 GND: 118553569 SELIBR: 189659 SUDOC: 026659166 BNF: cb11886570b (data) BIBSYS: 90055203 ULAN: 500404135 NLA: 35206138 NDL: 00540086 NKC: jn20000603003 ICCU: IT\ICCU\CFIV\000246 RLS: 000083136 BNE: XX891549 CiNii: DA00782980 Wedi dod o "https://cy.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Horas&oldid=9887952" Categorïau: Genedigaethau 65 CC Marwolaethau 8 CC Pobl o Basilicata Beirdd Lladin Llenorion Eidalaidd Llenyddiaeth Ladin Glasurol Categorïau cuddiedig: Articles with hCards Erthyglau sy'n defnyddio Nodyn Gwybodlen person Wicidata AC with 16 elements Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with ULAN identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers Llywio Offer personol Heb fewngofnodi Sgwrs Cyfraniadau Crëwch gyfrif Mewngofnodi Parthau Erthygl Sgwrs Amrywiolion Golygon Darllen Golygu Golygu cod y dudalen Gweld yr hanes More Chwilio Panel llywio Hafan Porth y Gymuned Y Caffi Materion cyfoes Newidiadau diweddar Erthygl ar hap Cymorth Rhoi Blwch offer Beth sy'n cysylltu yma Newidiadau perthnasol Tudalennau arbennig Dolen barhaol Gwybodaeth am y dudalen Cyfeiriwch at yr erthygl hon Eitem Wikidata Argraffu/allforio Llunio llyfr Lawrlwytho ar ffurf PDF Fersiwn argraffu Mewn prosiectau eraill Wikimedia Commons Ieithoedd eraill Afrikaans አማርኛ Aragonés العربية مصرى Asturianu تۆرکجه Башҡортса Žemaitėška Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ Български Brezhoneg Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Zazaki Ελληνικά English Esperanto Español Eesti Euskara فارسی Suomi Võro Français Furlan Gaeilge Galego עברית हिन्दी Fiji Hindi Hrvatski Magyar Հայերեն Interlingua Bahasa Indonesia Ido Íslenska Italiano 日本語 ქართული Қазақша 한국어 Kurdî Kernowek Latina Lingua Franca Nova Lietuvių Latviešu Malagasy Македонски മലയാളം Монгол मराठी Bahasa Melayu Nāhuatl Nederlands Norsk nynorsk Norsk bokmål Occitan ਪੰਜਾਬੀ Polski Piemontèis Português Română Tarandíne Русский Sardu Sicilianu Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Simple English Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Seeltersk Svenska Kiswahili தமிழ் Tagalog Türkçe Татарча/tatarça Українська Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча Tiếng Việt Volapük Walon Winaray 吴语 中文 粵語 Golygu cysylltau Newidiwyd y dudalen hon ddiwethaf ar 14 Mawrth 2020, am 21:37. Mae testun y dudalen ar gael dan drwydded Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike; gall fod telerau ychwanegol perthnasol. Gweler Telerau Defnyddio'r Drwydded am fanylion pellach. Polisi preifatrwydd Ynglŷn â Wicipedia Gwadiadau Golwg symudol Datblygwyr Statistics Cookie statement data-rero-ch-6904 ---- MARC HTML: A000081296 LDR     00520nz a2200193n 4500 001 81296 003 RERO 005 20200914091003.0 008 000610 a abbn a ana d 024 7 _ $a A010096578 $2 rero 024 7 _ $a 026659166 $2 idref 035 _ _ $a A000081296 039 _ 9 $a 202009140910 $b VLOAD $c 202009060657 $d VLOAD $c 202009011649 $d VLOAD $c 201907221703 $d 0005 $y 200006100009 $z VLOAD 040 _ _ $a RERO 100 1 _ $a Horatius Flaccus, Quintus 400 1 _ $a Horacio Flaco, Quinto 400 0 _ $a Horaz 400 0 _ $a Horace 400 1 _ $a Orazio Flacco, Quinto 400 0 _ $a Orazio data-bnf-fr-6864 ---- Horace (0065-0008 av. J.-C.) Data Télécharger les données Le modèle de données SPARQL Endpoint Contact français english deutsch Œuvres Documents sur Autour de Voir aussi Horace (0065-0008 av. J.-C.) Langue : latin Sexe : masculin Naissance : - 65 Mort : - 8 Domaines : Littératures Autres formes du nom : Quintus Horatius Flaccus (0065-0008 av. J.-C.) (latin) Quintus Horatius Flaccus (0065-0008 av. J.-C.) Horatius (0065-0008 av. J.-C.) Orazio (0065-0008 av. J.-C.) (italien) ISNI : ISNI 0000 0001 2145 2178 Horace (0065-0008 av. J.-C.) : œuvres (1 385 ressources dans data.bnf.fr) Œuvres textuelles (1 209) Chant séculaire Art poétique Épodes Epîtres Satires Odes Voir plus de documents de ce genre Œuvres musicales (155) Oderunt hilarem tristes (1970) avec Horace (0065-0008 av. J.-C.) comme Auteur du texte Poscimur, si quid vacui (1968) avec Horace (0065-0008 av. J.-C.) comme Auteur du texte Carmen saeculare (1788) avec Horace (0065-0008 av. J.-C.) comme Auteur du texte Miserarum est (1552) avec Horace (0065-0008 av. J.-C.) comme Auteur du texte Voir plus de documents de ce genre Manuscrits et archives (6) Quintus Horatius Flaccus, Epistulae (Latin 10401) avec Horace (0065-0008 av. J.-C.) comme Auteur du texte Comoediae sex (Latin 7900A) avec Horace (0065-0008 av. J.-C.) comme Auteur du texte Extraits divers de Ménandre et Térence, Théocrite et Virgile, Horace et Boileau, Euripide et Racine, Plaute et Molière. (Français 15228) avec Horace (0065-0008 av. J.-C.) comme Auteur du texte Claudien (0370?-0404?) Rapt de Proserpine (Latin 11324) avec Horace (0065-0008 av. J.-C.) comme Auteur du texte Quintus Horatius Flaccus, Epistolae (Latin 10401) avec Horace (0065-0008 av. J.-C.) comme Auteur du texte Quintus Horatius Flaccus, Odes - Epodes - Carmen saeculare - Ars poetica - Satyrae (fragmenta) (Latin 10401) avec Horace (0065-0008 av. J.-C.) comme Auteur du texte Documents sur Horace (0065-0008 av. J.-C.) (174 ressources dans data.bnf.fr) Livres (167) Frammenti di storia (2019) "tali dignus amico" (2019) La morale de l'amour dans les "Odes" d'Horace (2019) Chacun son Horace (2019) Reading Horace's lyric (2019) Horace (2019) Orazio (2018) Victorian Horace (2018) Horace and Seneca (2018) Leggere Orazio nella scuola tardo-antica (2017) Canidia, Rome's first witch (2017) L'invention de la vie privée et le modèle d'Horace (2017) L'invention de la vie privée et le modèle d'Horace (2017) Gespräche mit Göttern (2017) Quinto Orazio Flaco (2017) La prima linea della poesia lirica di età augustea (2016) The Medieval Horace (2015) Roman satire and the old comic tradition (2015) Horace between freedom and slavery (2015) Horace (2014) Brill's companion to Horace (2013) Augustan poetry and the Roman Republic (2013) Percorsi testuali oraziani (2013) Plenus litteris Lucanus (2013) Horacio lírico (2012) Roman lyric (2012) Horacio (2012) Horace's iambic criticism (2012) Horace as outsider (2011) Horace in dialogue (2010) Du latin au français d'Afrique noire (2010) A companion to Horace (2010) Lucretian receptions (2009) Horace (2009) Horaz (2009) Perceptions of Horace (2009) Horácio e a sua perenidade (2009) Sermo Iuris (2009) Ditirambo lucano (2008) The Cambridge companion to Horace (2007) Generic enrichment in Vergil and Horace (2007) La rappresentazione del tempo nell'opera di Orazio (2007) Der Horazkommentar des Pomponius Porphyrio (2007) Vasilij Vasil'evič Kapnist und seine Übertragungen von Gedichten des Horaz ins Russische (2007) Poetic interplay (2006) Horace (2005) Orazio nella letteratura italiana (2004) Régnier and Horace (2004) Horace à la campagne (2003) Boileau imitateur d'Horace et de Juvénal (2003) Melodien aus mittelalterlichen Horaz-Handschriften (2002) Christianorum Maro et Flaccus (2002) Horace and Greek lyric poetry (2002) Horace's well-trained reader (2002) Balde und Horaz (2002) Traditions and contexts in the poetry of Horace (2002) Zeit und Form (2002) Horaz (2001) Allan Ramsay and the search for Horace's villa (2001) La satira e il poeta (2001) Horace (2001) Horace and the gift economy of patronage (2001) The influence of Callimachean Aesthetics on the satires and odes of Horace (2001) Satires of Rome (2001) Studi oraziani (2000) Studi oraziani (2000) Horaz und Celtis (2000) Euphonia (2000) Ingenuitas (2000) Atoms, ataraxy, and allusion (2000) Vergil og Horats (2000) Der Horazkommentar des Porphyrio im Rahmen der kaiserzeitlichen Schul- und Bildungstradition (1999) La mort de Virgile d'après Horace et Ovide (1999) Horace à la campagne (1999) The English Horace (1998) Horace and the rhetoric of authority (1998) Horace's Narrative "Odes" (1997) Horace (1997) Der Wortakzent in den lyrischen Versen des Horaz (1997) Sabinum (1997) Riedel Horatiana (1996) The Roman satirists and their masks (1996) Da Orazio lirico a Leopardi (1996) Studies of classical influence on Boileau and La Fontaine (1996) Sul limitare (1996) Horace's epistles, Wieland and the reader (1995) Homage to Horace (1995) Musis amicus (1995) Horace (1995) Vita di Q. Orazio Flacco (1995) Horazische Denkfiguren (1995) Sport bei Horaz (1994) Orazio e la letteratura italiana (1994) Orazio (1994) La lingua parlata in Orazio (1994) Bimilenario de Horacio (1994) Orazio (1994) Repertorium locorum horatianorum in Patrum Ecclesiae scriptis (1994) Horaz-Studien (1994) Sprachliche Ambiguität bei Horaz (1994) Horacio, el poeta y el hombre (1994) Horats-studier (1994) Atti dei convegni di Venosa, Napoli, Roma (1994) Horace made new (1993) Letture oraziane (1993) Un angolo di mondo (1993) Autoritratto di un poeta (1993) Horace, l'oeuvre et les imitations (1993) Orazio (1993) Horace 2000 (1993) La mort de Virgile d'après Horace et Ovide (1993) Atti del convegno di Venosa (1993) La villa sabina di Orazio (1993) The walking muse (1993) Orazio (1993) "Postera crescam laude" (1993) Horaz (1993) Saggi e studi su Orazio (1993) Horaz in der Forschung nach 1957 (1992) Autobiographische Tierbilder bei Horaz (1992) Codices horatiani in Bibliotheca Apostolica Vaticana (1992) Vergiliana, Horatiana, Ovidiana, varia ad Thraciam pertinentia (1991) Orazio Flacco (1991) Ricordi lucani in Orazio (1991) Polyhymnia (1991) Orazio (1990) Concordantia Horatiana (1990) Saggio sopra Orazio (1990) L' Edera di Orazio (1990) The Poetry of criticism (1990) Présence d'Horace (1989) Orazio in colloquio (1989) Untersuchungen zur mittelalterlichen Horaz-Rezeption (1988) The English and Latin texts of Pope's "Imitations of Horace" (1988) Friedrich von Hagedorn und Horaz (1988) Orazio (1988) Agonistic poetry (1987) Studi su Orazio (1986) Die Althochdeutsche Horazglossierung (1986) Übersetzung des Horaz (1986) “O laborum dulce lenimen” (1986) Unity and design in Horace's "Odes" (1986) Horacjanizm w liryce polsko-łacińskiej renesansu i baroku (1985) Literary satire and theory (1985) Horaz-Vertonungen von Mittelalter bis zur Gegenwart, eine Anthologie (1985) Horaz und Actium (1984) Hwraʾṭyws (1984) Influences latines en Europe (1983) Profile of Horace (1982) Essays on Roman satire (1982) Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II. - Einunddreisigster Band. - 3. Teilband (1981) Die Bilder der horazischen Lyrik (1981) Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2. 31, 3 (1981) Geschichte des Textverständnisses am Beispiel von Pindar und Horaz (1981) A Kettős kötésű dativus Horatiusnál (1981) Words in a corner (1981) Studi su Orazio satiro (1979) Horace and his lyric poetry (1968) Pseudacronis scholia in Horatium vetustiora (1967) La survie d'Horace à l'époque romantique (1965) Lexicon Horatianum (1965) Horace (1962) Horacio y los poetras de su tiempo (1960) The Odes and Epodes of Horace (1960) Le lyrisme des Odes d'Horace (1926) [Recueil. Dossiers biographiques Boutillier du Retail. Documentation sur Horace] (1926) Sebastyana Petrycego Horatius Flaccus w trudach wie̡zienia moskiewskiego 1609 (1914) Études sur Horace appliquées au droit civil romain (1845) Images (5) Horace (1794) Horace (1794) Horace (1794) [Horatius Coclès] (1506) [Horatius Coclès] (1506) Documents d'archives et manuscrits (catalogue général) (1) Dissertation adressée au Père // Sanadon ; où // L'on examine la Traduction et les // Remarques de M. Dacier sur un endroit D'horace ; et où l'on // explique par occasion, ce qui regarde le Tétracorde des Grecs (1751) Cartes et plans (1) Topographie des vallées de Licenza et de Tivoli pour les recherches sur l'emplacement des villa d'Horace Autour de Horace (0065-0008 av. J.-C.) (239 ressources dans data.bnf.fr) Œuvres reliées (10) À Lydie (1869) Voir plus d’œuvres reliées de Horace (0065-0008 av. J.-C.) Thèmes liés (52) Actes de congrès Allemand (langue) -- 750-1050 (vieux haut-allemand) Basilicate (Italie) Bibliographie Biographies British library -- Manuscrit. Harley 2724 Canidie (personnage fictif) Catalogues Catalogues d'exposition Cheval Citations Comique (littérature) Concordances Glossaires et lexiques Guerriers Histoire -- Dans la littérature Horace, Villa d' (Italie) Imitation (littérature) Inspiration Intertextualité Littérature anglaise Littérature antique Littérature chrétienne primitive Littérature comparée -- Grecque et latine Littérature latine Métaphore Moi -- Dans la littérature Murs de villes Musique -- Antiquité Neumes Odes Ouvrages avant 1800 Pères de l'Église Persona (littérature) Phonostylistique Poésie anglaise Poésie française -- 19e siècle Poésie iambique Poésie latine Poésie latine médiévale et moderne Poésie lyrique latine Poésie politique latine Poésie satirique latine Politique et gouvernement -- Rome -- 1er siècle av. J.-C. Politique et littérature Registres Rhétorique antique Riedel, Hendrick (1796-1871) -- Bibliothèque Sabres Satire Satire latine Thèses et écrits académiques Auteurs liés en tant que auteur du texte (97) Nicolas Adam (1717-1792) Adam de Saint-Victor (10..-114.?) Alain de Lille (11..-1202?) Anacréon (0560?-0478? av. J-C.) Aristote (0384-0322 av. J.-C.) Aulu-Gelle (0123?-0180?) Ausone (0310?-0395?) Josse Bade (1461?-1535) Honoré de Balzac (1799-1850) Jules-Claude Barbier (1815-1901) Charles Baudelaire (1821-1867) Bartolomeo Benincasa (1746-1816) Émile Bergerat (1845-1923) Jean-François Bergier (1817-18..) Charles de Beys (1610-1659) Nicolas Boileau (1636-1711) Stanislas-Jean de Boufflers (1738-1815) Gerbrandus Adrianus Bredero (1585-1618) David-Augustin de Brueys (1640-1723) Dionysius Cato (02..?-02..?) Catulle (0087?-0052? av. J.-C.) Jules César (0100-0044 av. J.-C.) André Chénier (1762-1794) Columelle Amédée. Dethou (1811-1877) Charles Doyen (1797-1866) Pierre Antoine Romain Dubos (1766-1810) Jean-Antoine Du Cerceau (1670-1730) Émile Egger (1813-1885) Anatole France (1844-1924) Johann Thomas Freige (1543-1583) Caius Cornelius Gallus (0069-0026 av. J.C.) Johann Wilhelm Ludwig Gleim (1719-1803) Grattius Faliscus Pierre Grimal (1912-1996) Théodore Guiard (1814-1855) Hans-Christian Günther Ludwig Friedrich Heindorf (1774-1816) José Maria de Heredia (1842-1905) Helius Eobanus Hessus (1488-1540) Victor Hugo (1802-1885) Jules Janin (1804-1874) Juvénal (0060?-0130?) Alphonse de Lamartine (1790-1869) Denis Lambin (1516-1572) André Hippolyte Lemonnier (1794-1871) Giacomo Leopardi (1798-1837) Lucas Lossius (1508-1582) Lucain (0039-0065) Francesco Luisini (1524-1568) Macrobe (0370?-043.?) Johann Otto Maianus Aldo Manuzio (1547-1597) Clément Marot (1496-1544) Martial (0040?-0104?) Jacques Daniel Martine (1762-1846) Maximien (poète, 05..-05..) Pierre-Auguste-Marie Miger (1771-1837) Simon-Charles Miger (1736-1820) Frédéric Mistral (1830-1914) Charles-Louis Mollevaut (1776-1844) Michel de Montaigne (1533-1592) Cornelius Nepos (0100?-0025? av. J.-C.) Claude Nicole (1611-1685) Ovide (0043 av. J.-C.-0017) Niccolò Perotti (1429-1480) Perse (0034-0062) Pétrone (00..?-0066) Phèdre (0015? av. J.-C.-0054) François-André Philidor (1726-1795) Johannes Piscator (1546-1625) Alexander Pope (1688-1744) Properce (0050?-0015? av. J.-C.) Karl Wilhelm Ramler (1725-1798) Géraud Valet de Reganhac (1719-1787) Jean Richepin (1849-1926) Pierre de Ronsard (1524-1585) Enrico Rostagno (1860-1942) Johannes Rutgers (1589-1625) Salluste (0086-0035 av. J.-C.) Jean Salmon (1490-1557) Sénèque (0004 av. J.-C.-0065) Sidoine Apollinaire (saint, 0431?-0487?) Tiberius Catius Silius Italicus (0025?-0101) Édouard Sommer (1822-1866) Battista Spagnoli (1447-1516) Stace (0040?-0096) Marco Fidel Suárez (1855-1927) Sully Prudhomme (1839-1907) Johannes Sulpitius Verulanus (1430?-149.?) Tibulle (0050?-0018? av. J.-C.) Joost Van den Vondel (1587-1679) Otto Van Veen (1556-1629) Marco Girolamo Vida (1485-1566) François Villeneuve (18..-1956) Virgile (0070-0019 av. J.-C.) Erik Wistrand (1907-1998) Auteurs liés en tant que compositeur (61) Johann Anton André (1775-1842) Jacques Arcadelt (1507?-1568) Daniel-François-Esprit Auber (1782-1871) Ludwig van Beethoven (1770-1827) Friedrich Burchard Beneken (1760-1818) John Blow (1648?-1708) Johann Heinrich Karl Bornhardt (1774-1840) Sethus Calvisius (1556-1615) Henry Carey (1687-1743) Karl Ditters von Dittersdorf (1739-1799) Gaetano Donizetti (1797-1848) Bruno Ducol Alfonso Ferrabosco (1575?-1628) Jacobus Gallus (1550-1591) Paul-César Gibert (1717-1787) Christoph Willibald von Gluck (1714-1787) Carl Heinrich Graun (1703?-1759) Reynaldo Hahn (1874-1947) Georg Friedrich Händel (1685-1759) Hans Leo Hassler (1564-1612) Joseph Haydn (1732-1809) Friedrich Heinrich Himmel (1765-1814) Paul Hofhaimer (1459-1537) A. Z. Holmès (1847-1903) Friedrich Ludwig Aemilius Kunzen (1761-1817) Roland de Lassus (1532-1594) Giovanni de Macque (1548?-1614) Joseph Mainzer (1801-1851) Luca Marenzio (1553?-1599) Étienne-Nicolas Méhul (1763-1817) Felix Mendelssohn Bartholdy (1809-1847) Albert Gottlieb Methfessel (1785-1869) Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart (1756-1791) Alonso Mudarra (1510?-1580) Hans Georg Nägeli (1773-1836) Johann Gottlieb Naumann (1741-1801) Sigismund Neukomm (1778-1858) Georg Neumark (1621-1681) Giuseppe Antonio Paganelli (1710-1763) Michele Pesenti (1470?-1528) François-André Philidor (1726-1795) Henry Purcell (1659-1695) Johann Friedrich Reichardt (1752-1814) Vincenzo Righini (1756-1812) Wolfgang Rihm Johann Heinrich Rolle (1716-1785) Cipriano de Rore (1516?-1565) Johann Rosenmüller (1619?-1684) Johann Hermann Schein (1586-1630) Ludwig Senfl (1486?-1543?) Karl Spazier (1761-1805) Georg Philipp Telemann (1681-1767) Marcel Trémois (1891-1974) Petrus Tritonius (1465?-1525?) Melchior Vulpius (1570?-1615) Paul de Wailly (1854-1933) Johann Walter (1496-1570) Carl Maria von Weber (1786-1826) Peter von Winter (1754-1825) Carl Friedrich Zelter (1758-1832) Johann Rudolf Zumsteeg (1760-1802) Auteurs liés en tant que auteur ou responsable intellectuel (16) Johann Rudolph Ahle (1625-1673) Sethus Calvisius (1556-1615) Karl Ditters von Dittersdorf (1739-1799) Carl Heinrich Graun (1703?-1759) Georg Friedrich Händel (1685-1759) Friedrich Franz Hurka (1762-1805) Heinrich Isaac (1450?-1517) Ferdinand Kauer (1751-1831) Adam Krieger (1634-1666) Felix Mendelssohn Bartholdy (1809-1847) Hans Georg Nägeli (1773-1836) Johann Christian Heinrich Rinck (1770-1846) Johann Abraham Peter Schulz (1747-1800) Karl Spazier (1761-1805) Louis Spohr (1784-1859) Carl Friedrich Zelter (1758-1832) Auteurs liés en tant que parolier (2) Charles-Marie Leconte de Lisle (1818-1894) José Juan Tablada (1871-1945) Auteurs liés en tant que auteur de l'argument (1) Fernando Navarro Antolín Voir aussi À la BnF (2) Notice correspondante dans Catalogue général Notice correspondante dans BP16 Sur le Web (7) Notice correspondante dans Dbpedia Notice correspondante dans IdRef Notice correspondante dans ISNI Notice correspondante dans MusicBrainz Notice correspondante dans VIAF Notice correspondante dans Wikidata Notice correspondante dans Wikipedia Francophone Services BnF Poser une question à un bibliothécaire Venir à la BnF Reproduire un document Autres bases documentaires Recherche dans Gallica Retronews Catalogue général BnF archives et manuscrits BnF Image Catalogue collectif de France Europeana OCLC WorldCat Sudoc Outils Imprimer la page Exporter la page en PDF Signaler un problème sur la page Citer la page Permalien : Télécharger les données Télécharger en RDF ( xml | nt | n3 ) Télécharger en JSON-LD Télécharger en JSON Le Web sémantique dans data.bnf.fr informations mises à jour le 2020-09-22 |  À propos | Informations légales | Avertissements | Posez votre question | version 2.9.8 da-wikipedia-org-586 ---- Horats - Wikipedia, den frie encyklopædi Horats Fra Wikipedia, den frie encyklopædi Spring til navigation Spring til søgning Horats Romerske republik Horats malet af Anton von Werner Personlig information Født 8. december 65 f.v.t. Venosa Død 27. november 8 f.v.t. (56 år) Rom Gravsted Rom Uddannelse og virke Elev af Aristos fra Askalon, Kratippos fra Pergamon Beskæftigelse Skribent, filosof, digter Arbejdssted Rom Kendte værker Arc poetica Information med symbolet hentes fra Wikidata. Kildehenvisninger foreligger sammesteds.  [ redigér på Wikidata ] Quintus Horatius Flaccus (født 65 f.Kr., død 8 f.Kr.), ofte bare Horats, var en af de ypperste romerske digtere. Han stammede fra den syditalienske by Venusia, i den nuværende region Basilicata. Hans far var en frigiven slave, som skabte sig en pæn formue som inkassator og ved landbrug. Horats er citeret for at have sagt jeg hader den gemene pøbel, og holder afstand til dem (latin: odi profanum vulgus et arceo). Se også[redigér | redigér wikikode] Wikimedia Commons har flere filer relateret til Horats v d r Antikken (ca. 800 f.Kr. til 500 e.Kr.) Oldtidens Grækenland Det Deliske Søforbund Det athenske demokrati Dorer Græske kolonier Joner Makedonien Milet Mykene Olympia Oraklet i Delfi Peloponnes Peloponnesiske Krig Perikles Perserkrigene Polis Slaget ved Marathon Sokrates Solon Sparta Themistokles Troja Æoler Hellenismen Alexander den Store Athens historie Diadokerne Græsk mytologi Makedonerne Theben Thrakien Græsk litteratur Aischylos Aristofanes Aristoteles Demosthenes Euripides Herodot Hesiod Homer Iliaden Menander Ni lyrikere Odysseen Platon Sofokles Thukydid Xenofon Den romerske republik Det romerske Senat Etruskere Forbundsfællekrigen Gaius Julius Caesar Gallerkrigene Latium Puniske krige Romersk borger Romersk arkitektur Romersk religion SPQR Triumvirat Det romerske kejserrige Armenien Augustus Germanien Hadrian Hadrians mur Julisk-Claudiske dynasti Kejserkult Konstantin den Store Limes Mysteriereligion Pannonien Pax romana Prætorianergarden Trajan Urkristendom Det østromerske rige (Byzans) Belisar Byzans Cæsareopapisme Katafrakt Hagia Sophia Justinian 1. Økumeniske Konciler Ravenna Tetrarkiet Theodora Varægergarden Romersk litteratur Augustin Aulus Gellius Cicero Horats Livius Lukrets Martial Ovid Petronius Plautus Plinius den Ældre Plinius den Yngre Properts Quintilian Sallust Seneca Sveton Tacitus Vergil Æneiden Persien Achæmenide-dynastiet Dareios den Store Kyros 2. Mederne Partherriget Perserkrigene Sasaniderne Seleukiderne Xerxes 1. Zarathustra Zarathustrianisme Se også: Andre indgange til historien Autoritetsdata WorldCat VIAF: 100227522 LCCN: n79081354 ISNI: 0000 0001 2145 2178 GND: 118553569 SELIBR: 189659 SUDOC: 026659166 BNF: cb11886570b (data) BIBSYS: 90055203 ULAN: 500404135 MusicBrainz: af616f1f-6242-4802-a1bf-8d3f0647083c NLA: 35206138 NDL: 00540086 NKC: jn20000603003 ICCU: IT\ICCU\CFIV\000246 RLS: 000083136 BNE: XX891549 CiNii: DA00782980 Stub Denne forfatterbiografi er kun påbegyndt. Du kan hjælpe Wikipedia ved at tilføje mere. Hentet fra "https://da.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Horats&oldid=9550913" Kategorier: Født i 65 f.Kr. Døde i 8 f.Kr. Latinske forfattere Digtere fra Romerriget Personer fra Venosa Skjulte kategorier: Lokalt billede identisk med Wikidata Commons-kategori på Wikidata er ens med lokalt link Wikipedia artikler med VIAF autoritetsdata-ID Wikipedia artikler med LCCN autoritetsdata-ID Wikipedia artikler med ISNI autoritetsdata-ID Wikipedia artikler med GND autoritetsdata-ID Wikipedia artikler med SELIBR autoritetsdata-ID Wikipedia artikler med BNF autoritetsdata-ID Wikipedia artikler med BIBSYS autoritetsdata-ID Wikipedia artikler med ULAN autoritetsdata-ID Wikipedia artikler med MusicBrainz autoritetsdata-ID Wikipedia artikler med NLA autoritetsdata-ID Wikipedia artikler med NDL autoritetsdata-ID Påbegyndte forfatterbiografier Navigationsmenu Personlige værktøjer Ikke logget på Diskussion Bidrag Opret konto Log på Navnerum Artikel Diskussion Varianter Visninger Læs Redigér Redigér wikikode Se historik Mere Søg Navigation Forside Kategorier Fremhævet indhold Tilfældig side Tilfældige artikler Aktuelt Deltagelse Velkommen Skribentforside Landsbybrønden Projekter Portaler Ønskede artikler Oprydning Kalender Seneste ændringer Hjælp Værktøjer Hvad henviser hertil Relaterede ændringer Læg en fil op Specialsider Permanent link Oplysninger om siden Referér til denne side Wikidata-emne Organisation Donation Kontakt Wikipedia Wikimedia Danmark GLAM Udskriv/eksportér Lav en bog Download som PDF Udskriftsvenlig udgave I andre projekter Wikimedia Commons På andre sprog Afrikaans አማርኛ Aragonés العربية مصرى Asturianu تۆرکجه Башҡортса Žemaitėška Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ Български Brezhoneg Bosanski Català Čeština Cymraeg Deutsch Zazaki Ελληνικά English Esperanto Español Eesti Euskara فارسی Suomi Võro Français Furlan Gaeilge Galego עברית हिन्दी Fiji Hindi Hrvatski Magyar Հայերեն Interlingua Bahasa Indonesia Ido Íslenska Italiano 日本語 ქართული Қазақша 한국어 Kurdî Kernowek Latina Lingua Franca Nova Lietuvių Latviešu Malagasy Македонски മലയാളം Монгол मराठी Bahasa Melayu Nāhuatl Nederlands Norsk nynorsk Norsk bokmål Occitan ਪੰਜਾਬੀ Polski Piemontèis Português Română Tarandíne Русский Sardu Sicilianu Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Simple English Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Seeltersk Svenska Kiswahili தமிழ் Tagalog Türkçe Татарча/tatarça Українська Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча Tiếng Việt Volapük Walon Winaray 吴语 中文 粵語 Redigér links Denne side blev senest ændret den 27. maj 2018 kl. 17:42. Tekst er tilgængelig under Creative Commons Navngivelse/Del på samme vilkår 3.0; yderligere betingelser kan være gældende. Se brugsbetingelserne for flere oplysninger. Fortrolighedspolitik Om Wikipedia Forbehold Mobilvisning Udviklere Statistik Brug af cookies de-wikipedia-org-965 ---- Horaz – Wikipedia Horaz aus Wikipedia, der freien Enzyklopädie Zur Navigation springen Zur Suche springen Horaz (Aussprache: [hoˈraːt͡s], * 8. Dezember 65 v. Chr. in Venusia; † 27. November 8 v. Chr.), eigentlich Quintus Horatius Flaccus, ist neben Vergil, Properz, Tibull und Ovid einer der bedeutendsten römischen Dichter der Augusteischen Zeit. Seine philosophischen Ansichten und dicta gehörten bis in die Neuzeit zu den bekanntesten des Altertums und erfuhren reichhaltige Rezeption in Humanismus und Klassizismus. Horaz trieb die klassische Literatur eigener Zeit auf neue Höhen und war besonders für den englischen Klassizismus bedeutendstes antikes Vorbild. Horaz-Denkmal (1898) in Venosa Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Leben 1.1 Jugend 1.2 Dichter im Maecenaskreis 1.3 Spätwerk und Alter 2 Werk 2.1 Satiren 2.2 Epoden 2.2.1 Gestaltungskriterien und Inhalte 2.2.2 Weiterentwicklung zu den Oden 2.2.3 Chronologie und Aufbau 2.3 Oden 2.3.1 Datierung und produktive Bedingungen 2.3.2 Themen 2.4 Episteln 3 Philosophie 4 Wirkungsgeschichte 5 Textausgaben 5.1 Editionen 5.2 Übersetzungen 6 Literatur 7 Weblinks 8 Anmerkungen Leben[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten] Über das Leben des Dichters Horaz ist relativ viel bekannt. Dies liegt nicht in erster Linie an sekundärer biographischer Tradition, die mit Beschreibungen in der Vita Suetons im zweiten Jahrhundert einsetzte. Hauptquelle für die Biographie des Dichters bilden vielmehr Selbstaussagen. Sie dienten Horaz in zahlreichen Kontexten als Folien für seine Philosophie und metapoetischen Überlegungen. Diese Selbstaussagen wurden zwar nicht in der Absicht getätigt, Horaz’ Vita rekonstruieren zu helfen, verweisen jedoch auf zeitgenössische Ereignisse und Zustände, auf die der Dichter Bezug nimmt, und helfen so, ihn in einen Kontext einzuordnen.[1] Einen dritten Hinweis auf sein Leben bietet seine literarische Arbeitsweise, wozu die Auswahl seiner Motive und Verarbeitung seiner Stoffe gehört. Horaz zeigt sich selbst agierend im Alltagsgeschehen, welches Leser der Folgezeit auf Ereignisse seiner Zeit verweist, und bietet besonders in den Satiren Abbildung zeitgenössischer Beziehungen und Alltäglichkeiten, wozu ihm – nach Eigenaussagen – programmatisch der Satirendichter Lucilius als Vorbild diente.[2] Jugend[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten] Geboren wurde Horaz am 8. Dezember[3] 65 v. Chr. in Venusia, einer Stadt an der Grenze der italischen Provinzen Lukanien und Apulien.[4] Sein Vater – Horaz bezeichnet ihn als Freigelassenen (libertinus)[5] – arbeitete als coactor exactionum (Versteigerungsagent)[6] und besaß ein kleines Landgut,[7] das er sich selbst erarbeitet hatte.[8] Ob die Herkunft aus dem Sklavenstand auf Wahrheit beruht, wird unterschiedlich gesehen. Gordon Williams nahm an, es handle sich um allzu stilisierte Darstellung, durch die Horaz als Aufsteiger aus niedrigem Stand dargestellt werden sollte. Der Vater sei in Wirklichkeit italischer Herkunft gewesen und im Bürgerkrieg mit Sulla, wie viele Samniten auch, in Gefangenschaft geraten.[9] In aktuelleren Darstellungen mehren sich Gegenstimmen, die Williams' Aussage zu relativieren versuchen.[10] Außerdem ist strittig, ob Horaz' Vater mit diesem gutbezahlten Beruf zu Wohlstand gelangt ist. Horaz selbst verneint dies[11] und stilisiert das Leben seines Vaters als pauper, besonders, nachdem ihm im Zuge von Landverteilungen nach dem Römischen Bürgerkrieg das Gut seines Vaters konfisziert wurde.[12] Allerdings meint paupertas nicht eigentliche Armut (egestas), sondern genügsames und autarkes Landleben nach den Sitten römischer Frühzeit. Zudem muss er wenigstens so viel Geld besessen haben, seinem Sohn eine literarische und philosophische Ausbildung finanzieren zu können. Gordon Williams begriff Horaz' Stilisierung als eine Form des Understatements, die Kritikern des Vaters zeigen sollte, dass dieser als Sohn eines Freigelassenen zu großen Ehren gekommen war und sie ihn zu Unrecht mit seinem Stand verspottet haben.[13] Die Mutter hat Horaz in seinen Gedichten nie erwähnt.[14] Der Berg Voltur (Vulture) nahe dem Dorf Acerenza in Horaz' Heimat, den der Dichter in der Römerode 3, 4 im Stile des Helikon besingt Viele Erzählungen, die in Horaz' späterer Dichtung auftauchen, waren beeinflusst von seinen Jugenderfahrungen. Neben reichhaltiger Verwendung poetischer Stilisierungen der Natur, die häufig auf seine Heimatprovinz Bezug nehmen,[15] liefert Horaz Gründe für Moralvorstellungen und spätere Betonung zurückgezogenen und genügsamen Landlebens in der Ofellusgeschichte. Diesen Ofellus beschreibt er in den Satiren als Unterweiser in Jugendjahren, der ihm Sitten und Moralvorstellungen des Landmanns wie Einfachheit, Sparsamkeit und Naturbezogenheit mit dem Verweis auf seine Wurzeln näherbrachte. Wie Horaz selbst verlor dieser sein Gut durch Konfiskation.[16] Vermutlich von 53 bis 49 v. Chr. schickte Horaz' Vater ihn zum Literatur- und Grammatikstudium nach Rom.[17] Dort erhielt Horaz eine Ausbildung in der angesehenen Rednerschule des Grammatikers Orbilius, den er jedoch als plagosus (schlagfreudig) und später sogar als saevus magister (wütenden Lehrmeister) kennenlernte.[18] Neben diesen schlechten Erfahrungen in Rom und im dortigen Unterricht, die sich in Horaz’ starker Aversion gegen die Stadt bemerkbar machten, lernte er die archaischen Vorbilder lateinischer und griechischer Dichtung kennen, sowohl Livius Andronicus als auch die homerischen Epen Ilias und Odyssee und ihre moralisierenden Interpretationen.[19] Nach seinem Studium in Rom schickte ihn der Vater nach Athen, wo er griechische Philosophie und Literatur studierte.[20] In Athen beschäftigte sich Horaz mit altgriechischer Lyrik und versuchte sich in griechischen Versen, wenn auch nicht mit dem Ziel, Dichtung zu schreiben.[21] Außerdem hörte er Vorträge von Epikureern, Peripatetikern und Stoikern. Im Jahre 44 v. Chr., nach der Ermordung Caesars, warb Marcus Iunius Brutus in Athen römische Studenten als Rekruten für die republikanische Armee an, zu denen auch Horaz gehörte.[22] Unter Brutus' Kommando machte er schnell Karriere und stieg zum tribunus militum (Militärtribun) einer Legion auf.[23] Das jähe Ende seiner Militärzeit kam im Herbst 42, als die Armee des Brutus in der Schlacht bei Philippi der Caesarpartei Octavians unterlag. In kurzer Zeit verlor Horaz als Parteigänger von Brutus und Cassius das väterliche Landgut nach den Konfiskationen in Venusia und musste nach seiner Rückkehr nach Rom sämtliche Karrierehoffnungen aufgeben.[24] Er sah sich in die paupertas getrieben,[25] wobei sich diese Aussage bei ihm auf den Verlust seiner Ambitionen bezog, die er hinsichtlich einer zentralen Rolle im öffentlichen Leben hatte,[26] und auf die Erschütterung seiner Überzeugungen als freier Bürger Roms. Die Erfahrung des Verlusts einer öffentlichen Position in der Römischen Republik trieb ihn zu dem Entschluss, sich der Dichtkunst zuzuwenden. Nach den Altphilologen Robin G. M. Nisbet und Margaret Hubbard behandelte Horaz diese Hinwendung zur Dichtung in der Ode 2, 7, um sich in die Nachfolge der griechischen Dichtervorbilder Alkaios und Archilochos zu stellen.[27] Für diese Ode hat er den Vorwurf erhalten, er habe seine damalige Beteiligung an der Schlacht im Nachhinein zynisch oder gleichmütig gesehen, unter anderem, weil er schrieb, dass er (anders als Pompeius) seinen Schild in der Schlacht weggeworfen habe und nur noch Merkur gefolgt sei.[28] Tatsächlich scheint er jedoch die Schlacht als einschneidendes Ereignis für seinen Lebenswandel und seine politische virtus begriffen zu haben.[29] Mit seinem intellektuellen Lebenswandel ging die stärkere Zuwendung zum Epikureismus einher.[30] Die Vita Suetons erwähnt, dass er nach 43 in Rom von der Partei Octavians rehabilitiert wurde,[31] eventuell nach dem Vertrag von Brindisi 40 v. Chr.[32] Horaz selbst erkannte in der Retrospektive Augustus als universalen Regenten auch für diejenigen an, die durch den Bürgerkrieg in ihren Idealen und Erwartungen an die Republik enttäuscht worden waren.[33] Im Gegensatz zum Verlust seiner ideellen Ziele und politischen Ambitionen war Horaz' materielle Situation keinesfalls pauper oder unglücklich. Bereits in Athen hatte er mit dem Geld aus seiner Ausbildung ein gutes Leben geführt, Kontakte zur Oberschicht geknüpft und an Festlichkeiten und Gastmählern teilgenommen. Im Heer des Brutus konnte er als Militärtribun den Stand eines eques beanspruchen, wenn er sich nicht schon während eines ersten Romaufenthalts dort eingekauft hatte.[34] In den Satiren erweckte er den Eindruck, dass er sich sogar in den Stand eines Prätors oder Senators hätte einkaufen können, wenn er gewollt hätte.[35] In Rom hatte er gute Beziehungen zu angesehenen Rechtsbeiständen und prahlte unter anderem mit Kontakten zu Gaius Trebatius Testa und Lucius Manlius Torquatus.[36] Selbst nach der Niederlage von Philippi schaffte es Horaz, seine Verdienste erfolgreich einzusetzen und zu organisieren.[37] Nach der Rehabilitation durch Octavian kaufte er sich in das Amt eines Quästurschreibers ein, eine hochbezahlte Stellung, auf die er nach dem Verlust der väterlichen Güter vorerst sein Vermögen stützte.[38] Dichter im Maecenaskreis[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten] Die Dichter Vergil und Varius, die zu dieser Zeit in Rom große Erfolge feierten, wurden im Jahr 38 auf den jungen Horaz aufmerksam und stellten ihn dem adligen Gönner und Kunstliebhaber Maecenas vor.[39] Dieser wählte Dichter auf Grund ihres außergewöhnlichen Talents aus, unterstützte sie finanziell und sorgte mit regelmäßigen Rezitationen neuester Werke und poetologischen Diskussionen für den künstlerischen Austausch im privaten Kreis. Horaz hatte sich bis dahin weder als besonderer Dichter hervorgetan noch an irgendeiner Strömung römischer Dichtung besonderes Interesse gefunden.[40] Er präsentierte sich dem Gönner daher von der Seite seines niedrigen Standes und betonte seine einfachen Verhältnisse und seine Betroffenheit von den Landenteignungen.[41] Maecenas ließ ihn neun Monate auf eine Antwort warten, bevor er Horaz in seinen Dichterkreis aufnahm.[42] Hans-Christian Günther vermutete, dass hinter Horaz‘ Schilderungen die Stilisierung der Maecenasfigur als Verkörperung seiner früheren politischen Ambitionen stand. Horaz stellte sich wieder mit den Wurzeln eines einfachen Landmannes aus der Provinz vor, und ihm zum Gegenbild stand der politisch erfolgreiche und einflussreiche Machtmensch Maecenas, der tugendhaftes Handeln und weise politische Überlegungen verkörperte. Nur durch ihn gelang dem Dichter der parallele Aufstieg zu intellektueller Größe und Verdienst.[43] Charles François Jalabert (ca. 1846), Der Maecenaskreis mit dem rezitierenden Vergil, Horaz (Mitte) und dem hörenden Maecenas (rechts), sowie Varius im Hintergrund Nach seiner Aufnahme in den Maecenaskreis begleitete Horaz seinen Gönner auf politischen und diplomatischen Reisen, so 37 v. Chr. nach Brindisi (zusammen mit Vergil)[44] und 36 v. Chr. im Sizilienkrieg, wobei er bei einem Schiffbruch am Kap Palinurus fast ums Leben gekommen wäre.[45] Nach 35 brachte Horaz seine ersten Gedichte heraus. Dazu gehörte das erste Satirenbuch, in dem hauptsächlich die privaten Probleme des Dichters anklingen, sich im Kreis des Maecenas zurechtzufinden.[46] Danach folgten erste Adaptionen der altgriechischen Versmaße in den Iamben (Epoden), deren Herausgabe erst nach der Schlacht bei Actium 31 v. Chr. erfolgt sein kann.[47] Wie auch das zweite Satirenbuch, das nach den Iamben erschien, zeigten diese deutliche politische Parteinahme für die Seite Octavians und Vorbehalte gegen politisch-kulturelle Gegner wie etwa Kleopatra, die Horaz später in den Oden als fatale monstrum (todbringendes Wunderzeichen) betitelte.[48] Sieben Jahre nach den Epoden legte Horaz ein Kernstück seiner Poesie vor mit der geschlossenen Herausgabe von drei Odenbüchern, in denen er lyrische Versmaße der äolischen Dichter auf Latein verarbeitete. In der Zeit der neugeschaffenen Pax Augusta kamen Horaz' politische Stellungnahmen für den Herrscher immer deutlicher zum Ausdruck. Trotz der üblichen Motive augusteischer Dichtung, wie der recusatio (Zurückweisung eines Wunsches auf Herrscherlob mit dem Verweis des Dichters, dass er und seine Dichtung dafür nicht gut genug seien)[49] komponierte Horaz vor 23 v. Chr. auch Panegyrik auf Augustus, wie das carmen 1, 2 und 1, 12. Bereits Mitte der 30er Jahre schenkte Maecenas Horaz ein Landgut in den Sabinerbergen am Fuße des Bergs Lucretilis (Gennaro) im heutigen Tal von Licenza.[50] Dieses Sabinum, wie es Horaz nannte, war mit fünf coloni, einem vilicus und acht Sklaven zwar kein kleines, aber für die Verhältnisse in der römischen Oberschicht ein sparsames Haus.[51] Das Sabinum wurde für ihn schnell zum Inbegriff einer Rückzugsmöglichkeit in literarisches und philosophisches otium („Muße“). Im Gegensatz dazu wuchs seine Verachtung für die Hektik und die Gerüchte der Stadt Rom, deren Gegenstand als Bekannter in den höchsten Kreisen er war. Neben der Lästigkeit weniger Geschäfte in der Stadt legte Horaz in der bekannten Fabel von der Landmaus und der Stadtmaus dar, wie sehr das Leben des Maecenas in Rom den philosophischen Ansichten des Dichters entgegengesetzt war.[52] Später kamen weitere Güter in Horaz' Besitz, wie eine Villa in Tivoli[53] und eventuell ein Gut in Tarentum.[54] Die Ruhe, Zurückgezogenheit und Genügsamkeit des Sabinums besang Horaz in der Folge seiner Gedichte immer wieder. Ihnen widmete er große Teile seiner Satire 2, 7 und dem Tarentinum sowie Teile seines Briefes 1, 16. Spätwerk und Alter[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten] Als Horaz etwa 23 v. Chr. seine Oden fertiggestellt hatte, dachte er in seinem neuen Werk, den Versepisteln, ab 20 v. Chr. darüber nach, sich zur Ruhe zu setzen und das innovative Dichten von Lyrik aufzugeben.[55] Der große Erfolg seiner Oden und Horaz' gesicherter sozialer Status bewogen ihn dazu, die Notwendigkeit zu vermeiden, sich mit einer weiteren Neuerung abermals in den Mittelpunkt der Aufmerksamkeit von Kollegen und augusteischen Eliten zu stellen. Offenbar fanden sich neben den Lesern, die Horaz begehrte, viele Neider und Imitatoren.[56] Besonders das Alter, das Horaz für seine Entscheidung anführt, hielt der Philologe Hans-Christian Günther für einen plausiblen Grund, weil Horaz durch sein bewegtes Leben mit vielen Wendungen und Rückschlägen bereits in jungen Jahren die Fähigkeit zur reiferen Reflexion erhalten hatte, die ihn geistig vorzeitig habe altern lassen.[57] Nichtsdestoweniger stellte der Übergang in Horaz' dichterisches Spätwerk und seine Ankündigung, Abstand von der innovativen Dichtung zu nehmen, für die breite Öffentlichkeit der Leser ironischerweise gerade etwas Innovatives dar. Das erste Briefkorpus bestand nicht aus tatsächlichen oder fingierten Korrespondenzen, sondern dichterischen und sogar poetologischen Versepisteln, die nicht nur kunstvoll komponiert waren, sondern auch eine neue literarische Gattung darstellten.[58] Ernst Fries, Blick in die Sabinerberge östlich von Licenza, Öl auf Mahagoni, 1827 Ab etwa 20 v. Chr. verlor der Maecenaskreis für die Dichter immer mehr an Bedeutung. Vergil starb 19 v. Chr.[59] Varius 15 v. Chr., und Properz erwähnte Maecenas in seinem vierten Elegienbuch nicht einmal mehr. Genauso widmete Horaz dem Gönner kein weiteres Werk. Ob mit diesem Bedeutungsverlust ein politischer Bedeutungsverlust des Maecenas bei Augustus einherging, ist in den letzten Jahrzehnten in Zweifel gezogen worden. Der Auslöser für diese Vermutung war eine Passage bei Sueton, der behauptete, Maecenas habe Augustus’ Politik gegenüber das Interesse verloren. Er habe seinem Schwager Murena verraten, dass gegen ihn die Order vorliege, ihn zu beseitigen.[60] Diese Passage sah der Historiker Ronald Syme noch als plausibel an und schloss aus ihr, dass Maecenas durch seinen Verrat bei Augustus in Ungnade gefallen sei,[61] Williams dagegen analysierte sie in den 90er Jahren kritisch und kam zu dem Schluss, dass keine Belege Suetons Behauptung stützen konnten, sondern Augustus Maecenas unumschränkt vertraute.[62] Mit der Zeit ging das Patronageverhältnis von Maecenas, dem Verwalter augusteischer Kulturpolitik, auf Augustus als dessen Initiator über. Der Kaiser selbst nahm sich des Dichters an, und seine Wünsche als Princeps hatten Beachtung zu finden. Damit änderten sich Motive und Rhetorik von Horaz’ Werken. Eine einfache recusatio konnte politisch eine größere Bedeutung haben, wenn sie direkt gegenüber dem Kaiser geäußert würde, als gegenüber einem seiner Offiziere.[63] Außerdem hielt Augustus Horaz politisch-pragmatisch für wichtig: Er plante, ihn nach seiner Rückkehr von den Parthern zum Privatsekretär für das Entwerfen seiner Briefe zu machen.[64] Weil er wusste, dass der Dichter ein weiteres Briefbuch plante, wies er ihn darauf hin, dass eine Widmung dieser Werke in seinem Interesse liege. Horaz widmete Augustus folglich das zweite Briefbuch und auch den so genannten Pisonenbrief, die „Ars poetica“. Die Einbindung seiner Dichtung in die augusteische Kulturpolitik ging schließlich so weit, dass Augustus ihn 17 v. Chr. beauftragte, für einen Chor aus Jungen und Mädchen ein Festlied für die ludi saeculares zu schreiben.[65] Noch in seinem letzten oder vorletzten Werk, dem vierten Buch der Oden, brüstete sich Horaz mit der Bedeutung, die er mit diesem carmen saeculare in der römischen Gesellschaft erlangt hatte.[66] Er sah sich vom vulgären Satirendichter, der in unteren poetischen Genres und Rängen begann, zu einem bedeutenden Staatsdichter aufgestiegen.[67] Das letzte Buch der Oden kann als verschiedenfache Widmung gegenüber bedeutenden Personen der augusteischen Familie angesehen werden. Horaz schien es im Einvernehmen mit dem Princeps verfasst zu haben, angetrieben durch das carmen saeculare und eventuell bestrebt, seine enge Beziehung zu Augustus dichterisch festzuhalten.[68] Strittig bleibt bisher, wie sehr Horaz in seinem Spätwerk politisches Sprachrohr für die Ideen der Herrschenden war. Niall Rudd stellte zum Beispiel die Frage, wie Horaz’ Lebenssituation als ehemals republikanisch gesinnter Junggeselle und Lebemann auf politische Anklänge in seinen Gedichten Einfluss nehmen konnte, die auch die augusteischen Ehegesetze zum Thema hatten.[69] Sicherlich ist es schwierig, eine politische Position des Dichters Horaz hinter politischen Gedichten und Panegyrik wie der Ode 1, 12 oder 3, 14 zu suchen. Dies wurde zumeist im Kontext der eigenen Zeit und politisch-nationalen Überzeugungen der Betrachter getan.[70] Hans-Christian Günther warnte jedoch auch davor, Horaz als unpolitischen Hedonisten überzubetonen und ihn allein im Kontext der modernen „Spaßgesellschaft“ zu werten.[71] Zu einem erheblichen Teil prägte Horaz selbst das Bild von sich, doch lassen sich über die Jahre auch Änderungen in den sozialen und mentalen Lebensumständen des Dichters hinter dem Werk erkennen. Horaz sprach zum Beispiel in den Satiren den Dank an seinen Vater aus, der ein Symbol seines schnellen sozialen Aufstiegs war. Er stellte sich bewusst als Emporkömmling dar und betrachtete seinen jeweiligen sozialen Status als ständigen Ansporn und Streben nach Höherem. Dies ist als Selbstverteidigung vor dem Hintergrund der ständigen Angriffe von Neidern und Spöttern zu sehen.[72] Die Stilisierung des Vaters transformierte Horaz’ Vorstellungen von seinem Dichter-Ich in sein Werk, während er selbst durch seine Stellung in Rom und seine Dichtung großen finanziellen und persönlichen Erfolg hatte. Diese überkompensierte Betonung einer niedrigen Herkunft deutet auf die Unsicherheit des Dichters hin, der als ehemaliger Octaviangegner von niedrigem Stand plötzlich als Außenseiter in die höchsten Kreise der Augusteischen Kultur eintauchte.[73] Später beherrschte er ebenfalls die Kunst, sich als etablierter Dichter mit eigenen Überzeugungen den Herrschern gegenüber bescheiden zu geben und die leichteren Klänge von Wein, Liebe und Tanz zu besingen, wie er es in der Ode 2,1 von sich behauptete.[74] Die Beziehung zu Maecenas, auch wenn sie nun weniger wichtig für Horaz war, blieb bis zu dessen Tod freundschaftlich. In der Ode 4, 11 besingt Horaz die Iden des April, Maecenas' Geburtstag als außerordentliches Jubelfest, das ihm wertvoller als sein eigener Geburtstag gewesen sei.[75] 8 v. Chr. starb Maecenas und noch im selben Jahr, am 27. November, auch Horaz. Beider Gebeine wurden zum Esquilin gebracht.[76] Wie sehr die Freundschaft der beiden ungleichen Männer auf Gegenseitigkeit beruhte, zeigte Maecenas in seinem Epigramm:[77] „Ni te visceribus meis, Horati, Plus iam diligo, tu tuum sodalem Ninnio videas strigosiorem“ „Wenn ich dich nicht mehr liebe, Horaz, als mein eigen Fleisch und Blut, könntest du deinen Freund magerer sehen als Ninnius.“ Über Horaz' Liebesleben ist wenig bekannt; autobiographische Aussagen können hier nicht sicher von literarisch vorgeformten Motiven getrennt werden. In den Episteln sprach er vom Mädchen Cinara, die die einzig nachweisbare Frau in seiner Dichtung war und die er als junger Mann in Athen traf.[78] Ansonsten blieb Horaz Junggeselle. In den Epoden 8, 11 und 12 sinniert er über sexuelle Vorlieben und eine gewisse Antipathie gegen alternde Frauen. Oftmals sah er sich selbst bereits in mittleren Jahren als alter Lüstling, und seine Gedichte entbehren einer gewissen Romantik, wenn er zum Beispiel in der Satire 2, 3 schreibt, er sei in unzählige Mädchen und Jungen vernarrt gewesen.[79] Trotz zahlreicher Gerüchte in der biographischen Tradition und Vermutungen in der Forschung über eine mögliche Bisexualität[80] bleiben die Motive der horazischen Liebesdichtung eher unbestimmt, weder misogyn zwischen den Extremen schwankend, wie in der Liebeselegie, noch besonders sexistisch. Über sein Aussehen hat Horaz ausführlich selbst gesprochen. Er beschrieb sich als dick, wohlgenährt und von glänzender, gepflegter Haut.[81] Außerdem sei er von kurzer Statur, frühzeitig ergraut und schnell zu erzürnen, genauso leicht jedoch wieder zu beruhigen gewesen.[82] Horaz' cognomen Flaccus bedeutet so viel wie ‚Schlappohr‘. Werk[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten] Die künstlerische Entwicklung des Horaz kann in drei Stufen unterteilt werden: das temperamentvolle und angriffslustige Frühwerk, mit den Satiren und Epoden (42 bis ca. 30 v. Chr.) die klassische Reife, mit den Oden I-III und den Episteln I (ca. 31 v. Chr. bis Ende der 20er Jahre) die Abgeklärtheit des späten Werkes, mit dem Carmen saeculare, den Oden IV und den Episteln II, darunter die Ars Poetica, (18 bis 13 oder 10 v. Chr.) Besonders in den Anfangsjahren des Dichters überlagern sich die Entstehungszeiten der einzelnen Werke bis zur Herausgabe vollständiger Bücher. Die Darstellung von Eduard Fraenkel zum Werk der Epoden und Satiren hat versucht, die Satiren in der eigentlichen chronologischen Reihenfolge zu analysieren. Als ältestes Gedicht gilt dort wie allgemein die Satire 1, 2,[83] die Fränkel mit der unselbständigen Themenwahl begründete. Die Themenwahl der Gedichte brachte ebenfalls den Altphilologen Eckard Lefèvre zu der Annahme, dass zeitgleich mit der Satire 1, 2 früh zu datierende Epoden, unter anderem die Gedichte 7, 10 und 16, vorgelegen haben müssen, von denen Horaz für seine Aufnahme bei Maecenas diejenigen mit brisanten politischen Inhalten benutzte.[84] Auch im Spätwerk des Dichters überlappen sich immer wieder produktive Phasen, wie der Beginn des ersten Epistelbuchs nach den Oden oder die Frage, ob sein letztes Werk die Ars Poetica oder das vierte Odenbuch war.[85] Zudem sollten die Charakterisierungen als Orientierung dienen. Horaz sprach zwar in seinen Oden selbst davon, dass sein Frühwerk schneller und angriffslustiger war,[86] doch bewahrte er sich auch im Brief mit Augustus eine Vertrautheit, die sich im zynischen Umgang miteinander äußerte, der an seine frühen Werke für Maecenas erinnert. In seinem Brief fragte ihn der Kaiser scherzhaft, ob es Horaz’ späteres Bild beeinträchtigen würde, wenn er zugäbe, den Kaiser gekannt zu haben.[87] Außerdem nimmt er Bezug zu seinem Frühwerk, wenn er im vierten Odenbuch die Einfachheit seiner Dichtung betont. Gleich im ersten Gedicht lässt er die frühere Moralkritik der Römeroden und den Anspruch aus der 16. Epode, ein vates zu sein, beiseite und wird zu den leichten lyrischen Inhalten der ersten drei Odenbücher zurückgedrängt.[88] Satiren[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten] Saturae, 1577 Die zwei Bücher der Satiren bestehen aus zehn beziehungsweise acht teilweise recht umfangreichen Einzelgedichten in Hexametern. Horaz selbst nannte sie Sermones („Gespräche“). Er spricht darin mit Maecenas, mit dem Leser, mit sich selbst und führt die Personen im Dialog vor. Ziel dieser nicht unbedingt harmlosen Plaudereien ist, dem Leser mit Humor unangenehme Wahrheiten zu sagen. Vorbild war ihm der römische Satiriker Lucilius. Horaz war stets um das Wesentliche und Straffheit bemüht. So lautete sein Kunstprinzip: Vielfalt in der Beschränktheit. Zentrales Thema ist die rechte Lebensgestaltung. Die meisten Gedichte geißeln Laster, die sozialen Unfrieden stiften oder zumindest die menschlichen Beziehungen beeinträchtigen, wie zum Beispiel Habgier, Ehebruch, Aberglaube, Schlemmerei, … Im Gegensatz zu Lucilius, der hochgestellte Zeitgenossen schonungslos anprangerte, musste sich Horaz in dieser Beziehung zurückhalten. Seine Ausfälle beschränkten sich auf verstorbene Personen, einflusslose Leute und stadtbekannte Außenseiter. Nicht selten stellte er stellvertretend für den Normalbürger auch sich selbst und seine Schwächen dar. Epoden[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten] Gestaltungskriterien und Inhalte[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten] Als Epoden (griechisch ἐπῳδός „epodós“, Nachgesang, Refrain) werden die 17 Gedichte eines schmalen Buches bezeichnet, das um etwa 30 v. Chr. von Horaz herausgegeben wurde; Epoden deshalb, weil sich bei den einzelnen Versen der Gedichte jeweils ein jambischer Langvers (Trimeter) mit einem refrainartigen Kurzvers (Dimeter) abwechselt. Das Versmaß entsprach mehr den Regeln der griechischen Lyrik und stellte damit eine metrische Neuerung gegenüber dem Sprechvers der römischen Komödie, dem Senar, dar. Pionier in der Anwendung war vor Horaz der Dichter Catull. Horaz nannte sein Buch „Iambi“, obwohl nur elf Gedichte ausschließlich im Jambischen und die übrigen sechs in Kombinationen von jambischem und daktylischem Versmaß, dem Versfuß des Hexameters, geschrieben sind. Griechischer Urheber der Epodendichtung und Vorbild des Horaz war der Ionier Archilochos von Paros. Von ihm ist nicht mehr bekannt, als dass er während einer Sonnenfinsternis des Jahres 648 v. Chr. lebte[84] und sein Werk zwei bemerkenswerte Kennzeichen aufwies. Einmal galt er als Pionier und Meister jambischer Strophenformen, andererseits verwendete er die Form des Verses für extrem angriffslustige, persönlich verletzende und teils hetzerische Gedichte ohne Rücksicht auf den Stand der angegriffenen Personen. Im augusteischen Rom war eine Dichtung gleicher Prägung nicht denkbar. Horaz dichtete einerseits für seinen Gönner Maecenas sowie andererseits für einen unbekannten Leserkreis. Deshalb waren wie schon bei den „Satiren“ auch hier Vorsicht und Rücksicht geboten. Selten nannte er Namen, und wenn, dann meist Decknamen. So führt er in der wohl bekanntesten Epode Beatus ille den Geldverleiher Alfius vor, der ausführlich das idyllische Landleben lobt, dann jedoch trotzdem bei seinen städtischen Finanzgeschäften bleibt (ep. 2). Weiterhin verspottet er einen schmähsüchtigen Dichter unter dem Namen Maevius, einen Emporkömmling im Militär (ep. 4), zwei gealterte Hetären, deren körperlicher Verfall mit derb-obszönen Vergleichen geschildert wird, die jedoch ohne Namen bleiben (ep. 8 und 12), und eine Hexe namens Canidia (ep. 5 und ep. 17), die bereits in seinen Satiren auftauchte und die Fantasie nachfolgender Generationen immer wieder anregte. Dass Horaz in den Epoden keine konkreten Namen nannte, heißt zwar, dass er die inhaltlichen Gestaltungsmaßstäbe seines Vorbilds Archilochos änderte. Es heißt jedoch nicht, dass keine konkreten Persönlichkeiten hinter den Angriffen gegen bestimmte Typen gestanden haben. Die Identifikation des Dichters Maevius aus der zehnten Epode mit dem Mevius, dessen schlechte Verse Vergil in seiner dritten Ekloge beklagt,[89] ist von Altphilologen häufig hervorgehoben worden. Maevius’ Bezeichnung als eindeutig sexuell konnotierter geiler Bock (libidinosus caper),[90] den Horaz verdientermaßen opfern wollte, kann durchaus auf die Schmähung des Dichters Bezug nehmen, denn bereits bei Catull findet sich ein ähnlich gelagerter Fall, wo mit der Bezeichnung „Bock“ die Strafwürdigkeit einer bekannten Person codiert wird.[91] Weiterhin versuchte der spätantike Horazkommentator Porphyrio Personen der Epoden zu identifizieren, wie den Militärtribun der vierten Epode mit Menas, dem freigelassenen Flottenführer des Sextus Pompeius. Solche Identifizierungen sind wenig klar und oft angezweifelt worden, zeigen jedoch, dass früh über einen Wirkungskontext der Epoden spekuliert wurde. Dieser Wirkungskontext schien zunächst von einem kleinen Hörerkreis abzuhängen, der mit den gezielten, aber verdeckten Angriffen etwas anzufangen wusste. Der Freiburger Altphilologe Eckard Lefèvre sah einen wichtigen Hinweis für die Zielgerichtetheit der Epoden in der häufigen Pointiertheit. So lobt Horaz in der zweiten Epode über 66 Verse hinweg das sittsame Landleben, und erst in den letzten zwei Strophen löst er auf, dass ein Wucherer dieses Lob ausspricht, der sich im Auge des Landmannes unsittlich verhält. Ähnliches findet sich in der vierten Epode, in der Horaz seine Verachtung für einen Neureichen kundtut, von dem er erst in der letzten Zeile berichtet, ihm obliege die Verantwortung eines Militärtribuns. Derartig gezielte Pointen wären kaum von einem gewöhnlichen Spottdichter gesetzt worden.[92] Weiterentwicklung zu den Oden[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten] Horaz nutzte die archilochische Dichtung formal, trotzdem war auch hier seine Bereitschaft nicht hoch, seine Nachfolge in der Iambendichtung in den Vordergrund zu stellen. Dies lässt sich am Eröffnungsgedicht Ibis Liburnis ablesen, das von der Sorge um Horaz' Schicksal nach der bevorstehenden Schlacht bei Actium geprägt ist (ep. 1). Ähnlich gelagert ist das Jubellied über den Sieg bei Actium (Quando repostum, ep. 9). Beide Gedichte entstanden vor dem politischen Hintergrund des Siegs der Bürgerkriegspartei Octavians, der jedoch nur als Vorlage dient, um Feiern und die Freundschaft und den Dank zum Gönner Maecenas auszudrücken. Die zwei Gedichte, die das römische Volk zum Adressaten haben (Quo, quo scelesti und Altera iam teritur, ep. 7 und 16), hatten hingegen noch das Elend der Bürgerkriege beklagt, aus dem nur noch eine Auswanderung nach den Inseln der Seligen Rettung gewähre. In den Programmgedichten 1 und 9 treten Kritik an Zeitzuständen oder Schmähungen von Kriegertugenden nun völlig zurück. Die direkte Verbindung besteht bereits zum Jubellied auf den Tod der Kleopatra im carmen 37 des ersten Odenbuchs (Nunc est bibendum), das die Züge eines Alkäischen Trinkliedes aufweist und wohl zur selben Zeit wie die beiden Epoden entstanden sein muss. Motive der Iamben werden nur noch am Rande genannt, zum Beispiel die Aussage des Dichters, nicht wie Chremes werden zu wollen, der Topos des Geizhalses der plautinischen Komödie.[93] Horaz war also spätestens seit 31 v. Chr. auf dem Weg zur Lyrik der Oden. Untypisch für griechische Iamben war überdies die Selbstironie des Dichters in den Invektiven. Dies war Horaz’ persönliche Note für die Iambendichtung, ebenso wie seine Zustimmung und Fürsprache für den Freund Vergil in der Epode 10. Der von ihm geschmähte Neureiche in Epode 4 hatte als Militärtribun keine andere politische Laufbahn genommen als Horaz selbst. Die komische Klage Parentis siquis über Bauchschmerzen, die dem Dichter ein ländliches Gericht mit zu viel Knoblauch eingetragen habe (ep. 3), ist gleichzeitig ein Seitenhieb auf den schadenfrohen Maecenas, der sich darüber lustig macht, dass Horaz das gelobte einfache Essen vom Lande nicht bekommt. Daneben existieren eine Reihe von Themen, die sich iambenuntypisch durch das Buch ziehen und die Entwicklung des Dichters zur Odendichtung erkennen lassen. Mollis inertia, eine Entschuldigung für eine Pause im Dichten, die Horaz mit akutem Liebeskummer erklärt (ep. 14), der Trost im Wein (ep. 13) und die Liebe (ep. 11 und 15) sind Themen, die der Archilochischen Dichtung bereits völlig entgegenstanden. Teilweise setzte Horaz diese Antithetik von Form und Inhalt auch als komischen Effekt ein, zum Beispiel, wenn dem gelehrten Leser der Epode 2 klar wird, dass das langgezogene Loblied auf das Landleben in einer Gedichtform für Beleidigungen und Schmähungen steht. Mit der Entwicklung der Epoden- hin zur Odendichtung entwickelte Horaz seine politisch-philosophischen Einstellung als Dichter zum Staat. Eduard Fränkel wies darauf hin, dass es eine moderne Geisteshaltung sei, dem Dichter zu unterstellen, er hätte über die Wiederbelebung griechischer Kampflieder auf Leben und Gemeinwesen eine politische Geisteshaltung transportiert. Vielmehr entwickelte das Dichten selbst die Geisteshaltung des Dichters. Fränkel begriff daher Horaz' frühe Epode 16 auf den Bürgerkrieg als misslungenen Anfang, weil sie im Ton des freien griechischen Dichters nicht für die politische Situation des römischen Dichters niedrigen Standes taugten. Horaz’ Form der Anrede passte nicht in die Verfassungswirklichkeit römischer Redner. Der Vorschlag aus dem Iambenvorbild des Archilochos, dass die sittlich Guten des Volkes auf eine Insel auswandern sollten, war bei Horaz lediglich eine literarische Anspielung. Dass er sich vor diesem Hintergrund noch als vates gab,[94] hielt Fränkel für eine "kühne Konzeption".[95] Neuere Darstellungen neigen dazu, Horaz’ Ansprache an das römische Volk in Bezug auf das literarische Umfeld genauer zu deuten. Lefèvre schlussfolgerte entgegen Fränkel, dass Horaz nicht für einen großen politischen Zuschauerkreis dichtete, und hob das provokative Element der Aussagen und die literarischen Beziehungen zur vierten Ekloge Vergils hervor. Horaz bezog seine Berechtigung als vates durch den Bezug auf Vergil, der das goldene Zeitalter nach den Bürgerkriegen prophezeite. Ganz im Stile seiner Dichtung war Horaz’ Sicht auf die Zukunft jedoch keine idealisierte, sondern eine realistische, die den klaren Bruch und die völlige Abkapselung von der Vergangenheit forderte, gleichwie dem Auswandern auf eine Insel.[96] Chronologie und Aufbau[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten] Die pointierte Form der Epoden war ursprünglich für eine mündliche Rede ausgelegt. Dies lässt sich daran erkennen, dass manche Epoden zwischen Beschreibungen und Sprechparts wechseln oder wie die Epode 17 in der Dialogform Stoff für einen volkstümlichen Mimus bilden konnten. Weiterer Hinweis neben der Form ist die Verteidigung der Freunde, die ebenfalls auf die Wirkung in einem Rezitationskontext schließen lässt. Vor dem Hintergrund einer langen mündlichen Vorgeschichte der Epoden lassen sich auch die Abweichungen zwischen Entstehungszeit bzw. Datierung der einzelnen Gedichte und ihrer Zusammenstellung als Buch erkennen. Dahinter lief bereits die künstlerische Weiterentwicklung des Dichters zu den Alkäischen Oden und Trinkliedern ab. Es lässt sich daher eine grobe Chronologie des Epodenbuchs ausmachen. Epoden 16 und 7, beide ca. 38. v. Chr. (die frühesten, politischen Gedichte mit unterschiedlich gedeutetem Bezug von ep. 16 auf Vergils vierte Ekloge) Epode 10 (Maeviusepode), um 35 v. Chr. (wegen des Bezugs zu Vergils dritter Ekloge) Epoden 2–8 sowie die 12 und 17 (erster Invektivenzyklus, der vor den 'Liebesepoden' zwischen 38 und 30 v. Chr. entstanden sein muss, kleinere Gedichte wie 3 und 6 könnten frühe Übungsformen des Versmaßes darstellen)[97] Epoden 11 und 13–15 über Trinken, Liebe und Gesang, nach den Invektiven (wobei nach Fränkel die Epode 14 als letzte die Schwierigkeiten darstellt, das Buch fertigzustellen)[98] Epoden 1 und 9 als Programmgedichte, ca. 30/31 v. Chr. nach der Schlacht bei Actium Der Aufbau des Epodenbuchs folgt nicht dieser Chronologie. Wie bei vielen Gedichtsbüchern der Augusteischen Zeit stand eine Architektur hinter der Anordnung, die eine Entwicklung markiert, wie sich unschwer am ersten Wort der Sammlung Ibis (Du wirst gehen) und dem letzten Satz (ep. 17,81) plorem artis in te nil agentis exitus ? (soll ich etwa das Ende meiner Kunst beweinen [nur], weil die nichts an dir bewirkt?) zeigt. Ein herausragendes Organisationsprinzip für das Buch ist die metrische Anordnung der Gedichte, wobei die ersten 10 Epoden der distichischen jambischen Strophe folgen, die weiteren sechs die daktylische Variation derselben darstellen, und ein Gedicht in stichischen Trimetern die Sammlung beendet. Der erste Teil aus zehn Gedichten hat Vorbilder in der Literatur, wie die Eklogen Vergils.[99] Neben der metrischen lässt sich eine paarische Anordnung von inhaltlich ähnlichen Epoden erkennen, so z. B. die Epoden 3 und 14, die mit Widmung Horaz’ Beziehungen zu Maecenas thematisieren. Hans Christian Günther verwies auf ein literarisches Vorbild in den Iambi des Hellenistischen Dichters Kallimachos.[100] Dieser schrieb 13 Gedichte, und ausgerechnet die 13. Epode hat keinen inhaltlichen Zwilling.[101] Horaz hätte mit der Anordnung der restlichen Gedichte sein Möglichstes getan, die über Jahre versprengten Gedichte so in eine formal annehmbare Gestalt zu bringen. Eine weitere These ist die nach der Einheit des gesamten Epodenbuchs. So las Porter von der ersten bis zur letzten Epode ein Diminuendo von einer überschwänglichen Stimmung der ersten zu einer düsteren in der letzten Epode.[102] Diese Ansichten haben sich nicht durchgesetzt, und es gibt keine Hinweise, dass es Horaz’ Intention war, eine das Werk verbindende Gesamtstimmung zu kreieren. Die größte Einheit der Epoden bildet die Erkenntnis, dass sich der Dichter kontinuierlich zu den Oden weiterentwickelte, wie dies der Forscher Stephen Heyworth feststellte.[103] In diesem Zusammenhang ist noch der von Kathryn Gutzwiller herausgearbeitete Begriff des "associative bridging" zu nennen, also des Springens der Motive von einem Gedicht zum nächsten, sodass das Buch seine Motive wie eine Girlande aufzieht und schließlich am Ende generisch weiterzieht.[104] Oden[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten] Oden (Carmina 1,12) in einem Codex aus dem Besitz von Francesco Petrarca. Florenz, Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana, Plut. 34.1, fol. 9r (10. Jahrhundert) Horaz an Septimius, Zitat aus Oden 2,6 auf einer Gedenkplatte in Tarent Nach seinem Erfolg mit den „Satiren“ und „Epoden“ widmete sich Horaz der frühgriechischen Lieddichtung, deren Blütezeit etwa von 670 bis 450 v. Chr. dauerte. Während sich die griechischen Lieddichter selbst Sänger oder Musendiener nannten, bürgerte sich später der Begriff Lyriker nach ihrem Hauptinstrument, der siebensaitigen Lyra, ein. Horaz schrieb vier Lyrikbücher, die „Carmina“, die insgesamt 104 Gedichte enthalten. Die ersten drei publizierte er in einem Corpus um 23 v. Chr. und das vierte um 13 v. Chr. Im Gegensatz zu den nicht immer ganz ausgereiften „Epoden“ stellen die „Oden“ (Odé, Gesang) eine vollendete Meisterleistung dar. Datierung und produktive Bedingungen[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten] Obwohl die ersten drei Odenbücher als volumina (Buchrollen) herausgegeben wurden,[105] schrieb Horaz seine Gedichte nicht in der Reihenfolge der Komposition, die in den späteren Ausgaben und heutigen Texteditionen Standard geworden sind. Das Werk entstand über lange Zeit aus Stücken, die der Dichter nach und nach komponierte und die zunächst zur Rezitation auf Gastmählern gedient haben könnten. Eine der ältesten möglichen datierbaren Oden, das carmen 1,35, liegt in der Entstehungszeit noch vor der Schlacht bei Actium, etwa um 35 v. Chr.[106] Da der terminus post quem keiner Ode auszumachen ist, die jünger als 23 v. Chr. wäre, kann eine Veröffentlichung der Bücher zu diesem Zeitpunkt oder danach erfolgt sein. Im carmen 1,4 richtet Horaz die Rede an Lucius Sestius Quirinus, den Konsul des Jahres 23 v. Chr., von dem er unter anderem dessen Leidenschaft zum Würfelspiel und seine Zuneigung zum Knaben Lycidas thematisiert.[107] Dass die Oden nach 23 v. Chr. für eine Herausgabe als Ganzes von Horaz noch einmal überarbeitet, teilweise chronologisch geordnet und neu zusammengestellt wurden, zeigen einzelne chronologische Verläufe innerhalb des Werkes und die beiden parallelen Programmgedichte 1,1 und 3,30, deren beider Versmaß ein sich eingängig wiederholender, stichischer Asclepiadeus minor ist, das heißt, dasselbe Versmaß wird Zeile für Zeile wiederholt. Themen[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten] Themen sind wie schon bei den Griechen vor allem Liebe und Politik, aber auch Freundschaft, Alltäglichkeiten des Lebens und Fragen der Philosophie. Vorbild war unter anderem Alkaios von Lesbos, von dem er teilweise auch die Strophenform übernahm. Im großen Unterschied zu seinen griechischen Vorgängern war Horaz nur Dichter und nicht Musiker. Deshalb waren seine „Oden“ nicht vertont. Eine Ausnahme bildete nur das 17 v. Chr. für die Jahrhundertfeier, die den Beginn einer Friedensära einleiten sollte, verfasste „Carmen saeculare“. Wie auch schon die Chorlyriker liebte es Horaz, in einem Gedicht die verschiedensten Themen zusammenzufügen. Oft verwendete er verhaltene, hintergründige Aussagen. Mittel dazu waren treffende Bilder, Aussparungen, Offenlassungen und leise Untertöne. Viele seiner Gedichte beginnen wuchtig und klingen leicht und heiter aus. Beispiel: 1, 9. Obwohl Horaz kurze Gedichte bevorzugte, sind auch zahlreiche längere Gedichte erhalten. Wichtig sind hier vor allem das „Carmen saeculare“ und die sechs „Römeroden“. Letztere mahnten das römische Volk an die alten mores maiorum: Genügsamkeit, Tapferkeit, Treue, Standhaftigkeit, Gerechtigkeit und Ehrfurcht. Episteln[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten] Da die Oden nicht den erhofften Erfolg brachten, ließ Horaz ab 20 v. Chr. von der Lyrik ab und widmete sich dem ersten Buch der Epistulae („Episteln“). Horaz stellt in diesem Buch, das aus 20 Briefgedichten in Hexametern besteht, seine Lebensphilosophie dar. Diese Lebensphilosophie geht nicht von abstrakten Begriffen aus, sondern vom einzelnen Menschen mit seinen Fehlern, Schwächen und Eigenheiten. Sie fordert nicht auf, über den eigenen Schatten zu springen, wohl aber, sich in der eigenen Art um ein rechtes Maß zu bemühen, damit das Zusammenleben der Menschen erträglich bleibt. Vorbild für die „Epistulae“ waren ihm wahrscheinlich die Briefe des attischen Philosophen Epikur. Im zweiten Buch der „Epistulae“ ab 13 v. Chr. betätigte sich Horaz als Literaturkritiker. Drei große Briefgedichte widmete er am Ende seiner Schaffenszeit diesem Thema. Zwei davon bilden das zweite Buch der „Epistulae“. Im ersten Brief an Augustus kritisiert der Dichter die gedankenlose Überbewertung der altrömischen Dichtung, vor allem des Dramas, und weist auf den Wert der neuen Klassik, mit den Werken von Vergil und Varius, hin. Im zweiten Brief (an Florus) entsagt er scheinbar der Dichtung zugunsten der Philosophie, nur um in Wahrheit auf die erdrückenden Anforderungen an einen Dichter hinzuweisen. Im dritten und längsten Literaturbrief (an die Pisonen), der als gesondertes Buch unter dem Titel De arte poetica überliefert ist, will Horaz als Dichter Rechenschaft ablegen und den Geschmack verständiger Leser bilden. Er will Dilettanten, Nachahmern und Modepoeten das Handwerk erschweren, aber echte Begabung auf ihrem harten Weg ermuntern. Horaz hat in seiner Epistula ad Pisones auch eine Gliederung des Dramas in fünf Akte gefordert (Ars Poetica, V. 189) (siehe Regeldrama), die Nützlichkeit des literarischen Werkes mit dem Aspekt der Freude und der Unterhaltung verknüpft (Ars Poetica, V. 333 f.: „Aut prodesse volunt aut delectare poetae“) und den Mimesischarakter literarischer Werke (Ars Poetica, V. 361) betont. Philosophie[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten] Horaz bezeichnete sich selbst als einen Schüler Epikurs (Epicuri de grege porcum – „ein Schweinchen aus der Herde des Epikur“).[108] Dabei hängt er der epikureischen Lehre nicht auf orthodoxe Weise an, sondern hat für sich einige Grundprinzipien übernommen. Lust ist das höchste Gut und Schmerz das größte Übel. Dabei ist die wahre Lust die Ataraxia, der Zustand vollkommener Ruhe und Ungestörtheit, das stille Glück im Garten (bzw. auf dem Lande), das sich aus dem Getriebe der Welt heraushält. Λάθε βιώσας (Lebe im Verborgenen) war einer der Leitsätze des Kepos der Epikureer. Götter existieren, doch sie leben glückselig und abgesondert von der Welt und üben keinen Einfluss auf sie aus. Trotzdem muss man das Zitat aus Epistel 1, 1, Vers 14 mitlesen, um Horazens Lebenshaltung zu verstehen: Nullius addictus iurare in verba magistri („nicht verpflichtet, auf die Worte eines Meisters zu schwören“). Er mag zwar in vielerlei Hinsicht Epikureer sein, aber er möchte sich trotzdem als Freidenker verstehen. Horaz urteilt also nicht immer als Epikureer, sondern zum Beispiel auch als Anhänger der aristotelischen Philosophie (aurea mediocritas, Carminum liber II 10, Rectius vives, Licini,…). Wirkungsgeschichte[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten] Ausschnitt aus dem Fresko Der Parnass von Raffael, ca. 1508–1511 gemalt. Die vorne stehende männliche Figur wird als Horaz gedeutet. Horaz wurde bald Schulautor, erhielt aber nicht die Breitenwirkung wie Vergil oder Ovid. Dennoch war er besonders für den Gelehrtenkreis um Karl den Großen und später für die Humanisten wichtig. Von größter Bedeutung war Horaz aber für die französischen Klassiker des 16. und 17. Jahrhunderts. Insbesondere versuchten Dichter und Kritiker wie Nicolas Boileau oder Martin Opitz, aus dem Brief De arte poetica eine programmatische Poetik zu (re)konstruieren, wie sie in dieser Systematik von Horaz kaum beabsichtigt war. Textausgaben[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten] Editionen[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten] Quintus Horatius Flaccus: Opera. hrsg. v. Friedrich Klingner, (=BT), Dritte Auflage (zuerst 1939), Leipzig 1959 (und Nachdrucke) (gewöhnlich zitierte Standardausgabe, auf der viele spätere Editionen aufbauen) Quintus Horatius Flaccus: Opera. hrsg. v. D. R. Shackleton Bailey, (=BT), Vierte Auflage (zuerst 1985), Stuttgart 2001 (und Nachdrucke) (konjekturfreudiger Umgang mit dem überlieferten Text). Quintus Horatius Flaccus: Opera. hrsg .v. S.(tefan = István) Borzsák. (=BT), Leipzig 1984 (textkritisch behutsam und konservativ). Friedemann Weitz: "Lectiones Teubnerianae. Textkritische Ausgaben als Problemanzeige (am Beispiele Horazens)" http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/propylaeumdok/volltexte/2013/1881 (Übersicht der unterschiedlichen Lesungen der obigen drei Ausgaben in der Bibliotheca Teubneriana; mit einem Vortrag von Hermann Tränkle als Anhang: "Von Keller-Holder zu Shackleton-Bailey. Prinzipien und Probleme der Horaz-Edition"). Quintus Horatius Flaccus: Opera. hrsg. v. Edward C.(harles) Wickham, Oxford 1901; Zweite Auflage. hg. von Heathcote W.(illiam) Garrod, Oxford 1912 (und Nachdrucke). Übersetzungen[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten] Deutsch Christian Morgenstern: Horatius travestitus: Ein Studentenscherz, mit einem Anhang: Aus dem Nachlass des Horaz, Piper Verlag, München 1919, 4., vermehrte Auflage.[109] Horaz: Oden und Epoden. hrsg. v. W. Killy, Ernst A. Schmidt und übers. v. Ch. F. K. Herzlieb und J. P. Uz, Zürich/München 2000, ISBN 3-8289-4850-2. Horaz: Sämtliche Gedichte mit den Holzschnitten der Straßburger Ausgabe von 1498. lat./dt., hrsg. v. Bernhard Kytzler. Reclam, Stuttgart 1992, ISBN 3-15-028753-7. Horaz: Sämtliche Werke. hrsg. v. Hans Färber, Artemis & Winkler (Sammlung Tusculum), München 1993, zehnte Auflage. (in Versübersetzung) ISBN 3-7608-1544-8. Christoph Martin Wieland: Übersetzung des Horaz. hrsg. v. Manfred Fuhrmann, (= Bibliothek Deutscher Klassiker, Band 10), Dt. Klassiker-Verlag, Frankfurt am Main 1986 (einsprachig, Briefe und Satiren übers. mit Einl. u. Erkl., rezeptionsgeschichtlich relevant) ISBN 3-618-61690-2. Englisch Horace: Satires, Epistles and Ars poetica. hrsg. v. Henry Rushton Fairclough (= Loeb Classical Library, Band 194), Cambridge, Mass/ Harvard University Press u. a., Cambridge 1978 (ND, ältere Ausgabe, schwierig zu lesen) ISBN 0-674-99214-8. Horace: Odes and epodes. hrsg. v. Niall Rudd, (= Loeb Classical Library, Band 33), Cambridge, Mass. / Harvard University Press u. a., Cambridge 2004, ISBN 0-674-99609-7. Horace: Epodes. engl./lat., hrsg. v. David Mankin, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge 1995, ISBN 0-521-39469-4. Horace: The complete works of Horace. hrsg. v. Charles E. Passage, Ungar New York 1983, ISBN 0-8044-2404-7. Horatius Flaccus: The works of Horace, translated into verse. engl./lat., hrsg. v. Karina Williamson/Christopher Smart(= The poetical works of Christopher Smart, Band 5), Oxford 1996, ISBN 0-19-812772-3. Italienisch Quinto Orazio Flacco: Le opere Band I.1-II.4, hrsg. v. Paolo Fedeli/Carlo Carena (= Antiquitas perennis), Istituto Poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato, Rom 1991–1997, ISBN 88-240-3770-4. Orazio: Tutte le poesie ital./lat., hg. v. Paolo Fedeli/Carlo Carena, (= I millenni), Einaudi, Turin 2009, ISBN 978-88-06-19287-7. Quinto Orazio Flacco: Le opere ital./lat., hrsg. v. Mario Ramous (= I libri della spiga), Garzanti, Mailand 1988, ISBN 88-11-58670-4. Französisch Horace: Q. Horati Flacci opera avec un commentaire critique et explicatif des introd. et des tables. Hrsg. v. Frédéric Plessis, Paul Lejay. Hachette, Paris 1911 (enth. Satiren). Literatur[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten] Übersichtsdarstellung Michael von Albrecht: Geschichte der römischen Literatur von Andronicus bis Boethius und ihr Fortwirken. Band 1. 3., verbesserte und erweiterte Auflage. De Gruyter, Berlin 2012, ISBN 978-3-11-026525-5, S. 599–624 Einführungen und Gesamtdarstellungen Eduard Fraenkel: Horaz. 6. Auflage. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt 1983 (klassische Gesamtdarstellung der Dichtung des Horaz) Niklas Holzberg: Horaz. Dichter und Werk. C. H. Beck Verlag, München 2009, ISBN 978-3-406-57962-2. Bernhard Kytzler: Horaz. Eine Einführung. Reclam, Stuttgart 1996, 2000, ISBN 978-3-15-009603-1 (übersichtliche und gut verständliche Einführung) Eckard Lefèvre: Horaz. Dichter im augusteischen Rom. C. H. Beck, München 1993, ISBN 3-406-37336-4. Kommentare Q. Horatius Flaccus: Werke. Band 1/2, hg.v. und erkl. v. Adolf Kiessling/Richard Heinze, Dublin/Zürich 1966, Zwölfte Auflage. Lindsay C. Watson: A commentary on Horace’s Epodes. Oxford 2003. Robin G. M. Nisbet, Margaret Hubbard: A commentary on Horace. Odes Book I/II. Oxford 1970/1978. Robin G. M. Nisbet, Niall Rudd: A commentary on Horace. Odes Book III. Oxford 2004. Paolo Fideli, Irma Ciccarelli: Quintii Horatii Flacci Carmina Liber IV. Florenz 2008. Karl Numberger: Horaz, Lyrische Gedichte, Kommentar für Lehrer der Gymnasien und für Studierende. 3. Auflage. Aschendorff, Münster 1993. Untersuchungen zu einzelnen Themen Paul Barié: Horaz „Carpe diem. Pflücke den Tag“. Lebensweisheit in der Lyrik des Horaz (= Reihe: Exemplarische Reihe Literatur und Philosophie. 25). Sonnenberg, Annweiler 2008, ISBN 978-3-933264-52-7 Hans Oppermann (Hrsg.): Wege zu Horaz. Darmstadt 1980. Nina Mindt: Die meta-sympotischen Oden und Epoden des Horaz (= Vertumnus. Berliner Beiträge zur Klassischen Philologie und zu ihren Nachbargebieten. Band 3). Edition Ruprecht, Göttingen 2008, ISBN 978-3-89744-257-3. Michael C. J. Putnam: Artifices of Eternity. Horace’s Fourth Book of Odes. Cornell University Press, Ithaca/ London 1986 (glänzende ‚Rehabilitation‘ des lange als zweitrangig betrachteten vierten Odenbuches) Rezeption Gianluigi Baldo: Horaz (Quintus Horatius Flaccus). Carmina. In: Christine Walde (Hrsg.): Die Rezeption der antiken Literatur. Kulturhistorisches Werklexikon (= Der Neue Pauly. Supplemente. Band 7). Metzler, Stuttgart/Weimar 2010, ISBN 978-3-476-02034-5, Sp. 373–396. Tino Licht: Horazüberlieferung im Frühmittelalter. In: Ex Praeteritis Praesentia. Heidelberg 2006, S. 109–134.. Lexika Dominicus Bo: Lexicon Horatianum Bände I und II, Olms, Hildesheim 1965 und 1966. Enciclopedia Oraziana. Band I-III, Istituto della Enciclopedia Italiana, Rom 1996–1998. Weblinks[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten] Wikisource: Quintus Horatius Flaccus – Quellen und Volltexte (Latein) Wikisource: Horaz – Quellen und Volltexte Wikiquote: Horaz – Zitate Commons: Horaz – Album mit Bildern, Videos und Audiodateien Literatur von und über Horaz im Katalog der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Werke von und über Horaz in der Deutschen Digitalen Bibliothek Werke von Horaz im Projekt Gutenberg-DE Das Gesamtwerk des Horaz im lateinischen Originaltext, Bibliotheca Augustana Das 4. Buch der Oden – mit Kommentaren und Hilfen Briefe (Epistolae) Epoden (Iambi) und Oden (Carmina) Satiren (Sermones) gemeinfreie Hörbücher von Horaz bei LibriVox Kurzbiographie Leben, Werk, Textauswahl, Zitate, Literatur auf gottwein.de Horati opera, Acronis et Porphyrionis commentarii, varia lectio etc. (latine) Carmina Horatiana Alle Carmina des Horaz auf lateinisch deklamiert von Thomas Bervoets. Jutta Duhm-Heitzmann: 27.11.8 v. Chr. - Todestag des Dichters Horaz WDR ZeitZeichen vom 27. November 2013. (Podcast) Anmerkungen[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten] ↑ Eduard Fraenkel: Horace. Oxford 1957, S. 368–369. ↑ Vgl. Hor. serm. 2,1, 30-35. quot capitum vivunt, totidem studiorum milia: me pedibus delectat claudere verba Lucili ritu, nostrum melioris utroque. ille velut fidis arcana sodalibus olim credebat libris neque, si male cesserat, usquam decurrens alio neque, si bene. quo fit ut omnis votiva pateat veluti descripta tabella vita senis. sequor hunc […] (wie viele tausend Leben sind, so viele Bestrebungen gibt es auch. Mich freut es, in Lucilischer Art mit Versfüßen die Worte einzuschließen, eines Mannes, besser als jeder von uns. Jener vertraute einst seine Geheimnisse seinen Bücher wie guten Freunden an. Egal, ob Dinge schlecht oder gut eingetreten waren, wendete er sich nicht auf anderes. Daher kommt es, dass das Leben der Alten offen vor uns liegt, beschrieben wie ein Wunschtäfelchen. Diesem folge ich […]) ↑ Vgl. Suet. vita Hor. 7; Vgl. Hor. epist. 1,20,27. ↑ Vgl. Hor. serm. 2, 1, 34 und epod. 13, 6. ↑ Hor. Serm. 1, 6, 46.nunc ad me redeo libertino patre natum (Nun komme ich zu mir zurück, dem Sohn eines Freigelassenen) ↑ Suet. vita Hor. 1. Nach Sueton wurde auch angenommen, dass der Vater ein salsamentarius (Salzfischhändler) gewesen sei, weil jemand Horaz in einer Unterredung einst gesagt habe, er sehe ihn sich oft mit dem Arm die Nase schnäuzen ↑ Hor. serm. 1, 6, 71. ↑ Hor. serm. 1, 4, 108. ↑ Gordon Williams: Libertino patre natus: True or False? In: S. J. Harrison (Hrsg.): Homage to Horace. A bimillenary Celebration. Clarendon Press, Oxford 1995, S. 296 ff. ↑ John Kevin Newman: Horace as Outsider, (= Spudasmata 136), Georg Olms, Hildesheim/Zürich/New York 2011, S. 25; Edward Courtney: The two books of Satires. In: Hans-Christian Günther (Hrsg.): Brill’s Companion to Horace, Leiden und Boston 2013, S. 103 ff. ↑ Hor. serm. 1, 6, 87. ↑ Vgl. Hor. epist. 2, 2, 50–51. ↑ Gordon Williams: Libertino patre natus: True or False? In: S. J. Harrison (Hrsg.): Homage to Horace. A bimillenary Celebration. Clarendon Press, Oxford 1995, S. 299. ↑ Bernhard Kytzler: Horaz. Eine Einführung. Reclam, Stuttgart 1996, S. 15. ↑ Zum Beispiel Hor. carm. 3, 4, 9–28. ↑ Hor. serm. 2, 2, 112–114/129–130. ↑ Hor. serm. 1, 6, 76. ↑ Hor. epist. 2, 1, 70/1, 18, 13. ↑ Hans-Christian Günther: Horace’s life and work. In: derselbe (Hrsg.): Brill’s Companion to Horace. Leiden und Boston 2013, S. 16. ↑ Hor. epist. 2, 2, 44. ↑ Hor. serm. 1, 10, 31 ff. ↑ Plut. Brut. 24. ↑ Hor. serm. 1, 6, 46–47. ↑ Hor. epist. 2, 2, 46–47. ↑ Hor. epist. 2, 2, 51. ↑ Kenneth J. Reckford: Horace. (=World Authors, Band 73). Twayne Publishers, New York 1969, S. 23. ↑ Robin Nisbet, Margaret Hubbard: A Commentary on Horace. Band 2, Oxford 1978, S. 113–114. ↑ Hor. carm. 2, 7, 9–10. ↑ Hor. carm. 2, 9, 11. fracta virtus spielt auf die 'letzten Worte' des sterbenden Brutus an, die Cassius Dio 47, 49, 2 später überlieferte. ↑ Hans-Christian Günther: Horace’s life and work. In: derselbe (Hrsg.): Brill’s Companion to Horace. Leiden und Boston 2013, S. 30 ff. ↑ Suet. vita Hor. 7 ↑ François Hinard: Les Proscriptions de la Rome républicaine (= Collection de l’École française, Band 83), Rome 1985, S. 264 ff. ↑ Hor. carm. 4, 15, vgl. Michèle Lowrie: Horace, Odes 4. In: Gregson Davis (Hrsg.): A Companion to Horace. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester/Malden 2010, S. 229. ↑ Hor. serm. 2, 7, 53–54. Der Sklave Davus kritisiert hier den Rollenwechsel des Dichters, der durch verschiedene Äußerlichkeiten wie seinen Ring, immer mehr zu einem Richter der Dama werde. Die Satire nimmt Bezug auf die Satire 1,4,123, wo Horaz beschreibt, dass er schon zu seines Vaters Zeiten von ausgewählten Männern als Richter lernte. Davus beschrieb also offenbar ein Amt des Horaz, das mit der Zeit durch die Einstellung des Dichters korrumpiert wurde. ↑ Hor. serm. 1, 6, 107 ff.; vgl. David Armstrong: The Biographical and Social Foundations of Horace Poetic Voice. In: Gregson Davis (Hrsg.): A Companion to Horace. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester/Malden 2010, S. 18–19. ↑ Hor. serm. 1,5 / 2,1, epist. 1,5, carm. 4,7. ↑ Hans-Christian Günther: Horace’s life and work. In: derselbe (Hrsg.): Brill’s Companion to Horace. Leiden und Boston 2013, S. 26. ↑ Suet. vita Hor. 8. […] victisque partibus venia impetrata scriptum quaestorium comparavit. ↑ Hor. serm. 1, 6, 54 ff. ↑ Robin Nisbet: Collected Papers in Latin Literature, Oxford 1995, S. 391 ff. ↑ Hor. serm. 1, 6, 58 ff., vgl. David Armstrong: The Biographical and Social Foundations of Horace Poetic Voice. In: Hans-Christian Günther (Hrsg.): Brill’s Companion to Horace. Leiden und Boston 2013, S. 20. ↑ Hor. serm. 1, 6, 62. ↑ Hans-Christian Günther: Horace’s life and work. In: derselbe (Hrsg.): Brill’s Companion to Horace. Leiden und Boston 2013, S. 25. ↑ Hor. serm. 1, 5. ↑ Hor. carm. 3, 4, 28. ↑ Hans-Christian Günther: Horace’s life and work. In: derselbe (Hrsg.): Brill’s Companion to Horace. Leiden und Boston 2013, S. 34–35. ↑ Hans-Christian Günther: Horace’s life and work. In: derselbe (Hrsg.): Brill’s Companion to Horace. Leiden und Boston 2013, S. 34. ↑ Hor. carm 1, 36, 21, vgl. auch epod. 3, 9. ↑ Hor. carm. 2, 1. Horaz warnte mehrfach Asinius Pollio, der zu dieser Zeit sein Geschichtswerk über den Bürgerkrieg herausgeben wollte, wieder zur Tragödie und zu leichteren Klängen zurückzukehren. ↑ Suet. vita Hor. 65. ↑ Ernst A. Schmidt: Sabinum. Horaz und sein Landgut im Licenzatal. (= Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften, Schriften der Philosophisch-historischen Klasse 1997, Band 1), Heidelberg 1997, S. 20 ff. ↑ Hor. serm 2, 6, 79–105. ↑ Hor. carm. 4, 2, 30 ff. ↑ R. O. A. M. Lyne: 'Horace. Behind the Public Poetry', New Haven 1995, S. 10. ↑ Hor. epist. 1, 1, 7–11. ↑ Hor. epist. 1, 19, 19–23. O imitatores, servum pecus, ut mihi saepe bilem, saepe iocum vestri movere tumultus! (O Imitatoren, Sklavenvieh, wie euer Zetern mir oft die Galle, oft beißenden Witz hervortrieb. ↑ Hans-Christian Günther: Die Ästhetik der augusteischen Dichtung: Eine Ästhetik des Verzichts. Überlegungen zum Spätwerk des Horaz. Leiden/London 2010, S. 68. ↑ Eduard Fraenkel: Horace. Oxford 1957, S. 308 ff.; vgl. Richard Heinze: Die Augusteische Kultur. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt 1960 (ND), S. 295–304. Heinze verwies auf die Rückkehr zum Lucilianischen Dichtermotiv, (siehe Anm. 3) ↑ Vgl. Suet. Vit. Verg. 35–36. ↑ Vgl. Suet. Aug. 66,3. ↑ Vgl. Ronald Syme, The Roman Revolution, Oxford 1939, S. 343. ↑ Vgl. Gordon Williams: Did Maecenas “Fall from Favor”? Augustan Literary Patronage. In: Kurt A. Raaflaub, Mark Toher, G. W. Bowersock (Hrsg.): Between republic and empire: interpretations of Augustus and his principate. Oxford 1990, S. 261–262. Williams' Behauptung des gegenseitigen Vertrauensverhältnisses der beiden Männer stützt eine Passage bei Seneca dem Jüngeren, vgl. Sen. de brev. 6, 32, 4. ↑ Vgl. Gordon Williams, Did Maecenas „Fall from Favor? Augustan Literary Patronage“. In: Kurt A. Raaflaub, Mark Toher und G. W. Bowersock (Hrsg.): "Between Republic and Empire. Interpretations of Augustus and his Principate". Oxford 1990, S. 270. ↑ Suet. vita Hor. 16–17. ↑ CIL 6, 32323, 149. ↑ Hor. carm. 4, 6. ↑ Kenneth J. Reckford: Horace. (= World Authors, Band 73), Twayne Publishers, New York 1969, S. 143. ↑ Eduard Fraenkel: Horace. Oxford 1957, S. 18; Hans-Christian Günther: Horace’s life and work. In: derselbe (Hrsg.): Brill’s Companion to Horace. Leiden und Boston 2013, S. 47. ↑ Hans-Christian Günther: Horace’s life and work. In: derselbe (Hrsg.): Brill’s Companion to Horace. Leiden und Boston 2013, S. 60. ↑ Siehe zum Beispiel Ulrich von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff: Sappho und Simonides. Untersuchungen über griechische Lyriker., Berlin 1913, S. 323 „[…] der rechte Vermittler zwischen uns und den Griechen, denen gegenüber er am Ende jene Freiheit gewann, die auch wir behaupten wollen.“; vgl. Ronald Syme: The Roman Aristocracy, Oxford 1986, S. 454. ↑ Hans-Christian Günther: Horace’s life and work. In: derselbe (Hrsg.): Brill’s Companion to Horace. Leiden und Boston 2013, S. 57. ↑ Vgl. Hans-Christian Günther: Horace’s life and work. In: Brill’s Companion to Horace. hrsg. v. Hans-Christian Günther, Leiden/Boston 2013, S. 49. ↑ Vgl. John Kevin Newman: Horace as Outsider. (= Spudasmata 136), 2011, S. 20 ff. ↑ Vgl. Hor. carm. 2, 1, 39 ff. ↑ Hor. carm. 4, 11, 16 ff. ↑ Vgl. Suet. vita Hor. 78 ff. ↑ Suet. vita Hor. 16 ff. ↑ Hor. epist. 1, 2, 27. ↑ Hor. serm. 2, 3, 325. mille puellarum, puerorum mille furores ↑ Saara Lilja: Homosexuality in Republican and Augustan Rome (= Commentationes Humanarum Litterarum, Band 74), Helsinki 1983, S. 70 ff. ↑ Hor. epist. 1, 4, 15. ↑ Hor. epist. 1, 20, 24-25. ↑ Vgl. Eduard Fraenkel, Horace, Oxford 1957, S. 76. ↑ a b Eckard Lefèvre, Horaz, München 1993, S. 61. ↑ Vgl. Niall Rudd, Horace. Epistles Book II and the Epistle to the Pisones, Cambridge 1989, S. 19ff. ↑ Vgl. Hor. Oden 1, 16, 24–29. ↑ Vgl. Suet. vita Horatii, 45. ↑ Vgl. Hor. Oden 4, 1, 28–40. ↑ Vgl. Verg. Ecl. 3, 90. ↑ Epoden 10,23 ↑ Vgl. S. J. Harrison, Two Notes on Horace, Epodes (10, 16), in: The Classical Quarterly, Band 39 (1989), Nr. 01, S. 272 ff. ↑ Eckard Lefèvre, Horaz, München 1993, S. 75. ↑ Vgl. Hor. epod 1,33. ↑ Vgl. Hor. epod. 16, 66. ↑ Vgl. Eduard Fraenkel: Horace. Oxford 1957, S. 48. ↑ Eckard Lefèvre, Horaz, München 1993, S. 66. ↑ Hans-Christian Günther: The Book of Iambi. In: derselbe (Hrsg.): Brill’s Companion to Horace, Leiden und Boston 2013, S. 170. ↑ Vgl. Eduard Fraenkel: Horace. Oxford 1957, S. 69. ↑ Vgl. Lindsay Watson, A Commentary on Horace's Epodes, Oxford 2003, S. 20. ↑ Vgl. Hans-Christian Günther, The Two Books of Iambi, in: Brill’s Companion to Horace, hrsg. v. Hans-Christian Günther, Leiden/Boston 2013, S. 172., alternativ diskutieren Nisbet/Hubbard, A commentary on Horace, Band I, Oxford 1970, S. 28 f. eine spätere Datierung der Ode. ↑ David H. Porter, "Quo, Quo Scelesti Ruitis": The Downward Momentum of Horace's "Epodes", in: Illinois Classical Studies, Band 20 (1995), S. 129. ↑ David H. Porter, "Quo, Quo Scelesti Ruitis": The Downward Momentum of Horace's "Epodes", in: Illinois Classical Studies, Band 20 (1995), S. 112. ↑ Stephen J. Heyworth: Horace's Ibis: on the titles, unity and contents of the Epodes, in: Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar, Band 7 (1993), S. 93. ↑ Kathryn J. Gutzwiller, Poetic Garlands. Hellenistic Epigrams in Context. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998. ↑ Vgl. Hor. epist. 1,13,1 ff. ↑ Vgl. Hans-Christian Günther, The first collection of Odes, in: Brill’s Companion to Horace, hrsg. v. Hans-Christian Günther, Leiden/Boston 2013, S. 213., alternativ diskutieren Nisbet/Hubbard, A commentary on Horace, Band I, Oxford 1970, S. 28 f. eine spätere Datierung der Ode. ↑ Vgl. Hor. carm. 1,4,14 ff. ↑ Hor. epist. 1,4,16 ↑ [1] DNB-Link Normdaten (Person): GND: 118553569 (OGND, AKS) | LCCN: n79081354 | NDL: 00540086 | VIAF: 100227522 | Wikipedia-Personensuche Personendaten NAME Horaz ALTERNATIVNAMEN Horatius Flaccus, Quintus KURZBESCHREIBUNG römischer Dichter und Satiriker GEBURTSDATUM 65 v. Chr. GEBURTSORT Stadt Venusia (Venosa, Apulien) STERBEDATUM 27. November 8 v. Chr. Abgerufen von „https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Horaz&oldid=205944046“ Kategorien: Autor Literatur (Latein) Antike (Literatur) Lyrik Satire Namensgeber für einen Merkurkrater Römer Person (Venosa) Geboren 65 v. Chr. Gestorben 8 v. Chr. Mann Horaz Navigationsmenü Meine Werkzeuge Nicht angemeldet Diskussionsseite Beiträge Benutzerkonto erstellen Anmelden Namensräume Artikel Diskussion Varianten Ansichten Lesen Bearbeiten Quelltext bearbeiten Versionsgeschichte Weitere Suche Navigation Hauptseite Themenportale Zufälliger Artikel Mitmachen Artikel verbessern Neuen Artikel anlegen Autorenportal Hilfe Letzte Änderungen Kontakt Spenden Werkzeuge Links auf diese Seite Änderungen an verlinkten Seiten Spezialseiten Permanenter Link Seiten­informationen Artikel zitieren Wikidata-Datenobjekt Drucken/­exportieren Buch erstellen Als PDF herunterladen Druckversion In anderen Projekten Commons Wikiquote Wikisource In anderen Sprachen Afrikaans አማርኛ Aragonés العربية مصرى Asturianu تۆرکجه Башҡортса Žemaitėška Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ Български Brezhoneg Bosanski Català Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Zazaki Ελληνικά English Esperanto Español Eesti Euskara فارسی Suomi Võro Français Furlan Gaeilge Galego עברית हिन्दी Fiji Hindi Hrvatski Magyar Հայերեն Interlingua Bahasa Indonesia Ido Íslenska Italiano 日本語 ქართული Қазақша 한국어 Kurdî Kernowek Latina Lingua Franca Nova Lietuvių Latviešu Malagasy Македонски മലയാളം Монгол मराठी Bahasa Melayu Nāhuatl Nederlands Norsk nynorsk Norsk bokmål Occitan ਪੰਜਾਬੀ Polski Piemontèis Português Română Tarandíne Русский Sardu Sicilianu Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Simple English Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Seeltersk Svenska Kiswahili தமிழ் Tagalog Türkçe Татарча/tatarça Українська Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча Tiếng Việt Volapük Walon Winaray 吴语 中文 粵語 Links bearbeiten Diese Seite wurde zuletzt am 26. November 2020 um 07:12 Uhr bearbeitet. Abrufstatistik · Autoren Der Text ist unter der Lizenz „Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike“ verfügbar; Informationen zu den Urhebern und zum Lizenzstatus eingebundener Mediendateien (etwa Bilder oder Videos) können im Regelfall durch Anklicken dieser abgerufen werden. Möglicherweise unterliegen die Inhalte jeweils zusätzlichen Bedingungen. Durch die Nutzung dieser Website erklären Sie sich mit den Nutzungsbedingungen und der Datenschutzrichtlinie einverstanden. Wikipedia® ist eine eingetragene Marke der Wikimedia Foundation Inc. Datenschutz Über Wikipedia Impressum Mobile Ansicht Entwickler Statistiken Stellungnahme zu Cookies diq-wikipedia-org-9211 ---- Horatius - Wikipedia Horatius Wikipediya, ensiklopediya xosere ra Xıl de be pusula Xıl de cıgeyrayışi Horatius Melumato şexsi Dewlete Roma Antike Cınsiyet Camêrd Cay biyayışi Venosa Biyayış 8 Kanun 65 İR Merdış 27 Tışrino Peyên 8 İR (Roma de merdo) Cay merdışi Roma Gırwe Şair, nuştekar u Filozof Zıwani Latinki Şariye Ancient Romans Quintus Horatius Flaccus (b. Venosa, 8 Kanun 65 V.İ. - m. Roma, 27 Tışrino Peyên 8 V.İ. yew nuştekar u şairê İmperatoriya Roma biyo. Horatius nuştekarê Carminayo. Tedeestey 1 Qısey 2 Bibliyografiye (Vergilius) 3 Bibliyografiye 4 Çımey Qısey[bıvurne | çımeyi bıvurne] Dum loquimur fugerit invida aetas: carpe diem, quam minimum credula postero. Bibliyografiye (Vergilius)[bıvurne | çımeyi bıvurne] Horatius, Giacomo di Chirico Saturae, 41 V.İ.-30 V.İ. Epodon libri, 30 V.İ. Epistulae, 23V.İ.-20V.İ. Carmina 23V.İ.-19V.İ. Ars poetica, 19 V.İ. Carmen saeculare, 17 V.İ. Bibliyografiye[bıvurne | çımeyi bıvurne] Hutchinson, G (2002). 00The publication and individuality of Horace's Odes 1–3. Kiernan, Victor (1999). Horace: Poetics and Politics. Mankin, David (1995). Horace: Epodes. Cambridge university Press. McNeill, Randall (2010). Horace. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-980511-2. Campbell, A (1924). Horace: A New Interpretation. Conway, R (1921). New Studies of a Great Inheritance.. Barrow, R (1949). The Romans. Bischoff, B (1971). Living with the satirists". Classical Influences on European Culture AD 500–1500. Rossetti, Christina (2001). The Complete Poems. Rudd, Niall (1973). The Satires of Horace and Persius. Syme, R (1986). The Augustan Aristocracy. Çımey[bıvurne | çımeyi bıvurne] Arşivê Embarê Wikimediya de heqa Horatius de vêşêri multimedya esta. Biobliografiye Opera Omnia Retrieved from "https://diq.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Horatius&oldid=407548" Kategoriy: Camêrd Merdumê ke Venosa de biyê Merdumê merdey Merdumê ke Roma de merdê Nuştekarê İmperatoriya Roma Kategoriya nımıte: Pelê ke gıreyê efsunê ISBNi gurenenê Menuyê navigasyoni Hacetê şexsi Şıma nêkewtê hesabê xo Perra werênayışê nê IPy İştıraki Hesab vıraze Cı kewe Heruna nameyan Meqale Werênayış Varyanti Asayışi Bıwane Bıvurne Çımeyi bıvurne Verêni bıvêne Zêde Cıgeyrayış Navigasyon Pela seri Portalê cemati Vurnayışê peyêni Rapori Zazakipediya Portali Pela raştameyiye İştıraki Meydanê dewe Textey cerrebi Waştışi Peştdariye Bêc Piya guriyayış Xeberi Haceti Gırey be pele Vurnayışê eleqeyıni Dosya bar kerê Pelê xısusiyi Gırey be halê peyêni Melumatê pele Na pele çıme bımocne Unsurê Wikidata Çap/teber kerê Yew kıtab vırazê Warardışê PDF Versiyonê çapkerdışi Proceyanê binan de Embarê Wikimedya Zıwanê bini Afrikaans አማርኛ Aragonés العربية مصرى Asturianu تۆرکجه Башҡортса Žemaitėška Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ Български Brezhoneg Bosanski Català Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Ελληνικά English Esperanto Español Eesti Euskara فارسی Suomi Võro Français Furlan Gaeilge Galego עברית हिन्दी Fiji Hindi Hrvatski Magyar Հայերեն Interlingua Bahasa Indonesia Ido Íslenska Italiano 日本語 ქართული Қазақша 한국어 Kurdî Kernowek Latina Lingua Franca Nova Lietuvių Latviešu Malagasy Македонски മലയാളം Монгол मराठी Bahasa Melayu Nāhuatl Nederlands Norsk nynorsk Norsk bokmål Occitan ਪੰਜਾਬੀ Polski Piemontèis Português Română Tarandíne Русский Sardu Sicilianu Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Simple English Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Seeltersk Svenska Kiswahili தமிழ் Tagalog Türkçe Татарча/tatarça Українська Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча Tiếng Việt Volapük Walon Winaray 吴语 中文 粵語 Gıreyan bıvurne Ena pele tewr peyên roca 10:36 de, saeta 11 Şıbat 2020 de vurriya Nuşte Creative Commons Atıf-Zey Pê vılakerdış'i de yo; şertê bini tetbiq benê. Detayan rê Şertanê karkerdışi bıvênên. Madeyê nımıtışi Heqa Wikipediya de Redê mesulêti Asayışo mobil Raverberdoği İstatistiki Çerezê pêhesnayışi d-nb-info-4715 ---- DNB, Katalog der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Kontakt A-Z Träger / Förderer Datenschutz Impressum Hilfe Mein Konto English Katalog Einfache Suche Erweiterte Suche Browsen (DDC) Suchverlauf Meine Auswahl Hilfe Datenshop Mein Konto Ablieferung von Netzpublikationen Informationsvermittlung Über die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Katalog der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Gesamter Bestand Musikarchiv Exilsammlungen Buchmuseum Suchformular zurücksetzen     Expertensuche ?   Die Benutzungsbereiche der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek sind vom 16.12.2020 bis 10.01.2021 geschlossen. Bestellungen von Medien werden in dieser Zeit nicht bearbeitet. Alle Informationen dazu finden Sie auf unserer Homepage.   Die mehr als 1,3 Millionen frei zugänglichen Online-Publikationen können in der Trefferliste über "Alle Standorte - Online (frei zugänglich)" gefiltert werden. Zugang erhalten Sie in der Datensatzansicht über den Link "Archivobjekt öffnen" oder über die URN im Label "Persistent Identifier".   Aufgrund eines technischen Problems sind einige Online-Ressourcen (PDFs) nicht verfügbar, stattdessen wird die Meldung "Fehler: Kein Objekt vorhanden" angezeigt. Das Problem wird schnellstmöglich behoben. Wir bitten um Ihr Verständnis.     Ergebnis der Suche nach: nid=118553569 Treffer 1 von 1  Link zu diesem Datensatz http://d-nb.info/gnd/118553569 Person Horatius Flaccus, Quintus Geschlecht männlich Andere Namen Horacyusz Gorat͡sĭ̄ (AACR) Khorat͡siĭ (AACR) Quintus Horacius Flakus Horatz Oracio Oratio Ho-la-tz'ŭ Khorat͡siĭ Flak, Kvint (AACR) Horacio Flaco, Quinto Horacius Flakus, Quintus Horazius Flakkus, Quintus Horatius F., Q. Horatius Flaccus, Quinctus Horazius Flakus, Quintus Goraz Flakk, Kvint Orazjus Flaccus, Quintus Flaccus, Qu. Horatius Flaccus, Horatius Horatius, Flaccus Horatius, Poeta Horace, Flacce Orazio, Flacco Horace, de Venouse Oracius Flaccus Horacij Flaccus, Quintus H. Horatius Flaccus Horatius, Quintus Horatius Flaccus, Q. Horatio Flacco, Quinto Horazius Flaccus, Quintus Orazio Flacco, Quinto Horacjusz Flakkus, Kwintus Gorat̸s̶ĭ̄ (AACR) Khorat̸s̶iĭ Flak, Kvint (AACR) Khorat̸s̶iĭ (AACR) Horacy Flaccus, Quintus Horatius Horatius Orazio Horace Horaz Horacio Quintus Horatius Flaccus Quelle PAN; Thes. ling. Lat. (1990); Lex. alte Welt; LCAuth Zeit Lebensdaten: v65-v8 (Lebensdaten nach Pauly neu) 100 - 1 v. Chr. (UDK-Zeitcode v00) Land Römisches Reich (XT) Sprache(n) Latein (lat) Geografischer Bezug Geburtsort: Venosa Wirkungsort: Rom Sterbeort: Rom Beruf(e) Schriftsteller Philosoph Weitere Angaben Augusteischer Dichter aus dem Kreis des Maecenas Beziehungen zu Personen Servius (VD-16 Mitverf.) Caesarius, Johann (VD-16 Mitverf.) Tritonius, Petrus (VD-16 Mitverf.) Honorius, Johannes (VD-16 Mitverf.) Irenicus, Franciscus (VD-16 Mitverf.) Poelmann, Theodor (VD-16 Mitverf.) Hartung, Johannes (VD-16 Mitverf.) Frischlin, Nicodemus (VD-16 Mitverf.) Ramus, Petrus (VD-16 Mitverf.) Vettori, Pietro (VD-16 Mitverf.) Systematik 12.2p Personen zu Literaturgeschichte (Schriftsteller) ; 16.1p Personen der Geschichtswissenschaft (Historiker, Archäologen) ; 11.2p Personen zu Sprache Typ Person (piz) Autor von 364 Publikationen Sämtliche Werke Horatius Flaccus, Quintus. - Berlin/Boston : De Gruyter, 2018, 1. Auflage [Werke] Sämtliche Werke Horatius Flaccus, Quintus. - Berlin : De Gruyter, [2018] ... Beteiligt an 25 Publikationen Die Spur der Maus Münster : Ed. Depping, 2005 Mondphasen Leipzig : Ed. Erata, 2005, 1. Aufl. ... Thema in 56 Publikationen Non omnis moriar Hildesheim : Georg Olms Verlag, 2020 tali dignus amico Flores Militello, Vicente. - Tübingen : Narr Francke Attempto Verlag, 2019 ... Maschinell verknüpft mit 6 Publikationen Die Oden des Horaz in Reimstrophen Berlin/Boston : De Gruyter, 2018, Reprint 2018 Die "Siebte Epode" von Horaz. Analyse der politischen und gattungshistorischen Aspekte des Gedichtes Möller, Laurenz. - München : GRIN Verlag, 2016, 1. Auflage, digitale Originalausgabe ... Exemplarbezogene Daten stehen derzeit nicht zur Verfügung. Die Online-Bestellung von Medien ist deshalb nicht möglich. Treffer 1 von 1 Aktionen In meine Auswahl übernehmen Druckansicht Versenden MARC21-XML-Repräsentation dieses Datensatzes RDF (Turtle)-Repräsentation dieses Datensatzes Dokumentation RDF (Linked Data Service) Korrekturanfrage Nachweis der Quelle Zugehöriger Artikel in Wikipedia Administration Version 1.7.19.2 / 2020-07-06T12:29:38Seitenanfang donate-wikimedia-org-6625 ---- Make your donation now - Wikimedia Foundation Make your donation now Jump to navigation Jump to search We ask you, humbly, to help. We'll get straight to the point: Today we ask you to defend Wikipedia's independence. We're a non-profit that depends on donations to stay online and thriving, but 98% of our readers don't give; they simply look the other way. If everyone who reads Wikipedia gave just a little, we could keep Wikipedia thriving for years to come. The price of a cup of coffee is all we ask. When we made Wikipedia a non-profit, people told us we’d regret it. But if Wikipedia were to become commercial, it would be a great loss to the world. Wikipedia is a place to learn, not a place for advertising. The heart and soul of Wikipedia is a community of people working to bring you unlimited access to reliable, neutral information. We know that most people will ignore this message. But if Wikipedia is useful to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $20, $50 or whatever you can to protect and sustain Wikipedia. Thanks, Jimmy Wales Wikipedia Founder It appears that you do not have JavaScript enabled, or your browser does not support it. In order to provide a safe, secure and pleasant experience, our donation form requires JavaScript. Loading… (If the form does not load, your web browser may not be supported. Please try a different browser.) Donation amount (USD) Just Once Give Monthly $2.75 $5 $10 $20 $30 $50 $100 Other Please select an amount (minimum $1) We cannot accept donations greater than USD $4 ($1 $2) through our website. Please contact our major gifts staff at $3. Donate by credit/debit card I'll generously add $X to cover the transaction fees so you can keep 100% of my donation. Where your donation goes Technology: Servers, bandwidth, maintenance, development. Wikipedia is one of the top 10 websites in the world, and it runs on a fraction of what other top websites spend. People and Projects: The other top websites have thousands of employees. We have about 400 staff and contractors to support a wide variety of projects, making your donation a great investment in a highly-efficient not-for-profit organization. Tax deductibility information We do not sell or trade your information to anyone. By donating, you agree to share your personal information with the Wikimedia Foundation, the nonprofit organization that hosts Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects, and its service providers pursuant to our donor policy. Wikimedia Foundation and its service providers are located in the United States and in other countries whose privacy laws may not be equivalent to your own. For more information please read our donor policy. For recurring donors, fixed monthly payments will be debited by the Wikimedia Foundation on the monthly anniversary of the first donation, until such time as you notify us to discontinue them. Donations initiated on the 29, 30, or 31 of the month will recur on the last day of the month for shorter months, as close to the original date as possible. For questions, please contact donate@wikimedia.org. Problems donating? Other ways to give Frequently asked questions Retrieved from "https://donate.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:LandingPage" Navigation menu Personal tools English Log in Namespaces Special page Variants Views More Search Navigation Support pages index Other ways to give Problems donating Cancel or change recurring giving Matching Gifts Wiki Recent changes Documentation (collab) Tools Special pages Printable version Privacy policy About Donate Disclaimers Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement el-wikipedia-org-9540 ---- Οράτιος - Βικιπαίδεια Οράτιος Από τη Βικιπαίδεια, την ελεύθερη εγκυκλοπαίδεια Μετάβαση στην πλοήγηση Πήδηση στην αναζήτηση Το λήμμα παραθέτει τις πηγές του αόριστα, χωρίς παραπομπές. Βοηθήστε συνδέοντας το κείμενο με τις πηγές χρησιμοποιώντας παραπομπές, ώστε να είναι επαληθεύσιμο. Η σήμανση τοποθετήθηκε στις 18/03/2012. Οράτιος Όνομα Οράτιος Γέννηση 8 Δεκεμβρίου 65 π.Χ. Βενόζα, Ρωμαϊκή Δημοκρατία Θάνατος 27 Νοεμβρίου 8 π.Χ. (57 ετών) Ρώμη Επάγγελμα/ ιδιότητες ποιητής[1][2], συγγραφέας[3] και φιλόσοφος[4] Εθνικότητα Ρωμαίος Υπηκοότητα Αρχαία Ρώμη Είδη Λυρική ποίηση Αξιοσημείωτα έργα Ωδές, Σάτιρες, Ποιητική Τέχνη  Πολυμέσα σχετικά με τoν συγγραφέα δεδομένα (π • σ • ε ) Ο Κουίντος Οράτιος Φλάκκος (Quintus Horatius Flaccus, 8 Δεκεμβρίου 65 π.Χ. - 27 Νοεμβρίου 8 π.Χ.), γνωστότερος απλώς ως Οράτιος, ήταν ο κορυφαίος Ρωμαίος λυρικός ποιητής κατά την εποχή του Οκταβιανού Αύγουστου. Για πολλούς είναι ένας από τους δύο μεγαλύτερους Λατίνους ποιητές όλων των εποχών μαζί με τον Βιργίλιο. Πίνακας περιεχομένων 1 Η ζωή του 2 Το έργο του 2.1 Λυρικά 2.2 Δακτυλικά Η ζωή του[Επεξεργασία | επεξεργασία κώδικα] Γεννήθηκε στη Βενόζα, μία κωμόπολη στα σύνορα Απουλίας και Λουκανίας, ως γιος απελεύθερου γεννημένος ο ίδιος ελεύθερος. Ο πατέρας του εργαζόταν ως μεσάζοντας σε δημοπρασίες. Παρότι ο ποιητής παρουσιάζει τον εαυτό του ως «πτωχόν και τίμιον» αγρότη (macro pauper agello, «Σάτιρες» 1.6.71), η ασχολία του πατέρα του ήταν επικερδής για τους πρώην σκλάβους: ο πατέρας του μπόρεσε να ξοδέψει αρκετά χρήματα για την εκπαίδευση του γιου του, συνοδεύοντάς τον αρχικώς στη Ρώμη για τη στοιχειώδη μόρφωση και στέλνοντάς τον κατόπιν στην Αθήνα να μελετήσει Ελληνικά και Φιλοσοφία. Ο Οράτιος αργότερα εξέφρασε την ευγνωμοσύνη του ως εξής: «Αν ο χαρακτήρας μου βαρύνεται με λίγα μικρά ελαττώματα, κατά τα άλλα είναι τίμιος και ηθικός. Αν λίγους μόνο διάσπαρτους λεκέδες μπορείτε να δείξετε σε μια κατά τ´άλλα αγνή επιφάνεια, αν κανείς δε μπορεί να με κατηγορήσει για φιλοχρηματία, ή λαγνεία, ή ασωτίες, αν ζω ζωή ενάρετη, αμόλυντη από ακαθαρσίες (συγχωρείστε μου προς στιγμή τον αυτοέπαινό μου),κι αν είμαι ένας καλός φίλος για τους φίλους μου, στον πατέρα μου οφείλονται όλα αυτά... ... Αξίζει από μένα ευγνωμοσύνη και αίνο. Ποτέ δε θα μπορούσα να ντρέπομαι για ένα τέτοιο πατέρα, ούτε και νιώθω ανάγκη καμιά ν' απολογηθώ, σαν πολλούς άλλους, επειδή είμαι γιος απελεύθερου». («Σάτιρες» 1.6.65-92) Μετά τη δολοφονία του Ιουλίου Καίσαρα, ο Οράτιος πήγε στο στρατό, υπό τις διαταγές του στρατηγού Βρούτου. Πόλεμησε ως αξιωματικός (tribunus militum) στη Μάχη των Φιλίππων. Αργότερα ισχυρίσθηκε ότι σώθηκε πετώντας την ασπίδα του και φεύγοντας. Επειδή κηρύχθηκε αμνηστία για όσους είχαν πολεμήσει κατά του Οκταβιανού Αυγούστου, ο Οράτιος επέστρεψε στην Ιταλία, όπου όμως ανακάλυψε ότι η ακίνητη περιουσία του είχε δημευθεί και (μάλλον) ότι ο πατέρας του είχε πεθάνει. Είχε πάντως τα χρήματα για να αγοράσει μία μόνιμη θέση εργασίας ως scriba quaestorius, ένα αξίωμα του Θησαυροφυλακίου, που του επέτρεψε να ζήσει άνετα και να επιδοθεί στην ποιητική του τέχνη. Αργότερα κατόρθωσε να εισέλθει σε ένα λογοτεχνικό κύκλο που περιελάμβανε τους Βιργίλιο και Ρούφο. Εκείνοι τον γνώρισαν στον Μαικήνα, φίλο και έμπιστο του Αυγούστου, που έγινε ο προστάτης του και δώρισε στον Οράτιο ένα αγρόκτημα με έπαυλη κοντά στο Tibur (το σημερινό Τίβολι). Μη έχοντας κληρονόμους, ο Οράτιος το άφησε πεθαίνοντας στον αυτοκράτορα Αύγουστο. Το αγρόκτημα διατηρείται και σήμερα ως τόπος προσκυνήματος για τους φίλους του έργου του. Το έργο του[Επεξεργασία | επεξεργασία κώδικα] Ο Οράτιος έγραψε ποιήματα λυρικά και ποιήματα δαχτυλικά. Λυρικά[Επεξεργασία | επεξεργασία κώδικα] 4 βιβλία με τις Ωδές Οι Επωδοί (1 βιβλίο, 17 επωδοί κατα το πρότυπο του Καλλίμαχου) Ο Εκατονταέτηρος Ύμνος (του ανατέθηκε το 17 π.Χ. να συνθέσει έναν ύμνο της Εκατονταετίας και να τον διδάξει σε ένα χορό αγοριών και κοριτσιών) Δακτυλικά[Επεξεργασία | επεξεργασία κώδικα] Τα Wikimedia Commons έχουν πολυμέσα σχετικά με το θέμα    Οράτιος 2 βιβλία Σατιρών 2 βιβλία Επιστολών Ποιητική Τέχνη(ARS POETICA) Σύνδεσμοι σε καταλόγους καθιερωμένων όρων WorldCat VIAF: 100227522 Europeana: agent/base/60033 ΕΒΕ: 62641 BiblioNet: 3460 LCCN: n79081354 ISNI: 0000 0001 2145 2178 GND: 118553569 SELIBR: 189659 SUDOC: 026659166 BNF: cb11886570b (data) BIBSYS: 90055203 ULAN: 500404135 MusicBrainz: af616f1f-6242-4802-a1bf-8d3f0647083c NLA: 35206138 NDL: 00540086 NKC: jn20000603003 ICCU: IT\ICCU\CFIV\000246 RLS: 000083136 BNE: XX891549 CiNii: DA00782980 Στο λήμμα αυτό έχει ενσωματωθεί κείμενο από το λήμμα Horace της Αγγλικής Βικιπαίδειας, η οποία διανέμεται υπό την GNU FDL και την CC-BY-SA 3.0. (ιστορικό/συντάκτες).  Αυτό το λήμμα που σχετίζεται με τη βιογραφία ενός προσώπου χρειάζεται επέκταση. Βοηθήστε τη Βικιπαίδεια επεκτείνοντάς το!. ↑ William Young Sellar, James Gow: «Horace» (Αγγλικά) ↑ BeWeB. 518. Ανακτήθηκε στις 4  Αυγούστου 2020. ↑ (Ιταλικά) Mirabile: Digital Archives for Medieval Culture. SISMEL – Edizioni del Galluzzo. ↑ Ανακτήθηκε στις 20  Ιουνίου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε από "https://el.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Οράτιος&oldid=6509256" Κατηγορία: Ρωμαίοι ποιητές Κρυμμένες κατηγορίες: Λήμματα που χρειάζονται παραπομπές από 03/2012 Λήμματα που χρειάζονται παραπομπές Έλεγχος:Παραπομπές από Wikidata Κατηγορία Commons με τοπικό σύνδεσμο ίδιο με των Wikidata AC με 20 στοιχεία Λήμματα Βικιπαίδειας με αναγνωριστικά VIAF Λήμματα Βικιπαίδειας με αναγνωριστικά Europeana Λήμματα Βικιπαίδειας με αναγνωριστικά EBE Λήμματα Βικιπαίδειας με αναγνωριστικά BiblioNet Λήμματα Βικιπαίδειας με αναγνωριστικά LCCN Λήμματα Βικιπαίδειας με αναγνωριστικά ISNI Λήμματα Βικιπαίδειας με αναγνωριστικά GND Λήμματα Βικιπαίδειας με αναγνωριστικά SELIBR Λήμματα Βικιπαίδειας με αναγνωριστικά BNF Λήμματα Βικιπαίδειας με αναγνωριστικά BIBSYS Λήμματα Βικιπαίδειας με αναγνωριστικά ULAN Λήμματα Βικιπαίδειας με αναγνωριστικά MusicBrainz Λήμματα Βικιπαίδειας με αναγνωριστικά NLA Βιογραφία-επέκταση Μενού πλοήγησης Προσωπικά εργαλεία Χωρίς Σύνδεση Συζήτηση για αυτή την IP Συνεισφορές Δημιουργία λογαριασμού Σύνδεση Ονοματοχώροι Λήμμα Συζήτηση Παραλλαγές Προβολές Ανάγνωση Επεξεργασία Επεξεργασία κώδικα Προβολή ιστορικού Περισσότερα Αναζήτηση Πλοήγηση Κύρια πύλη Κατάλογος λημμάτων Προβεβλημένα λήμματα Τρέχοντα γεγονότα Τυχαίο λήμμα Συμμετοχή Βοήθεια Πύλη Κοινότητας Αγορά Πρόσφατες αλλαγές Επικοινωνία Δωρεές Εργαλεία Συνδέσεις προς εδώ Σχετικές αλλαγές Ειδικές σελίδες Σταθερός σύνδεσμος Πληροφορίες σελίδας Παραπομπή Αντικείμενο Wikidata Εκτύπωση/εξαγωγή Δημιουργία βιβλίου Κατέβασμα ως PDF Εκτυπώσιμη έκδοση Σε άλλα εγχειρήματα Wikimedia Commons Βικιφθέγματα Άλλες γλώσσες Afrikaans አማርኛ Aragonés العربية مصرى Asturianu تۆرکجه Башҡортса Žemaitėška Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ Български Brezhoneg Bosanski Català Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Zazaki English Esperanto Español Eesti Euskara فارسی Suomi Võro Français Furlan Gaeilge Galego עברית हिन्दी Fiji Hindi Hrvatski Magyar Հայերեն Interlingua Bahasa Indonesia Ido Íslenska Italiano 日本語 ქართული Қазақша 한국어 Kurdî Kernowek Latina Lingua Franca Nova Lietuvių Latviešu Malagasy Македонски മലയാളം Монгол मराठी Bahasa Melayu Nāhuatl Nederlands Norsk nynorsk Norsk bokmål Occitan ਪੰਜਾਬੀ Polski Piemontèis Português Română Tarandíne Русский Sardu Sicilianu Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Simple English Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Seeltersk Svenska Kiswahili தமிழ் Tagalog Türkçe Татарча/tatarça Українська Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча Tiếng Việt Volapük Walon Winaray 吴语 中文 粵語 Επεξεργασία συνδέσμων Τελευταία τροποποίηση 00:19, 7 Ιουνίου 2017. Όλα τα κείμενα είναι διαθέσιμα υπό την Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License· μπορεί να ισχύουν και πρόσθετοι όροι. Χρησιμοποιώντας αυτό τον ιστότοπο, συμφωνείτε στους Όρους Χρήσης και την Πολιτική Ιδιωτικότητας. Το Wikipedia® είναι καταχωρημένο σήμα του Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., ενός μη κερδοσκοπικού οργανισμού. Πολιτική προσωπικών δεδομένων Για τη Βικιπαίδεια Αποποίηση ευθυνών Προβολή κινητού Προγραμματιστές Στατιστικά Δήλωση cookie en-m-wikipedia-org-4124 ---- Horace - Wikipedia Open main menu Home Random Nearby Log in Settings Donate About Wikipedia Disclaimers Search Horace Language Watch Edit This article is about the Roman poet. For the Egyptian god, see Horus. For other uses, see Horace (disambiguation). Quintus Horatius Flaccus (8 December 65 – 27 November 8 BC), known in the English-speaking world as Horace (/ˈhɒrɪs/), was the leading Roman lyric poet during the time of Augustus (also known as Octavian). The rhetorician Quintilian regarded his Odes as just about the only Latin lyrics worth reading: "He can be lofty sometimes, yet he is also full of charm and grace, versatile in his figures, and felicitously daring in his choice of words."[nb 1] Horace Horace, as imagined by Anton von Werner Born Quintus Horatius Flaccus 8 December 65 BC Venusia, Italy, Roman Republic Died 27 November 8 BC (age 56) Rome Resting place Rome Occupation Soldier, scriba quaestorius, poet, senator Language Latin Nationality Roman Genre Lyric poetry Notable works Odes "The Art of Poetry" Horace also crafted elegant hexameter verses (Satires and Epistles) and caustic iambic poetry (Epodes). The hexameters are amusing yet serious works, friendly in tone, leading the ancient satirist Persius to comment: "as his friend laughs, Horace slyly puts his finger on his every fault; once let in, he plays about the heartstrings".[nb 2] His career coincided with Rome's momentous change from a republic to an empire. An officer in the republican army defeated at the Battle of Philippi in 42 BC, he was befriended by Octavian's right-hand man in civil affairs, Maecenas, and became a spokesman for the new regime. For some commentators, his association with the regime was a delicate balance in which he maintained a strong measure of independence (he was "a master of the graceful sidestep")[1] but for others he was, in John Dryden's phrase, "a well-mannered court slave".[2][nb 3] Contents 1 Life 1.1 Childhood 1.2 Adulthood 1.2.1 Poet 1.2.2 Knight 2 Works 2.1 Historical context 2.2 Themes 3 Reception 3.1 Antiquity 3.2 Middle Ages and Renaissance 3.3 Age of Enlightenment 3.4 19th century on 4 Translations 5 In popular culture 6 See also 7 Notes 8 Citations 9 References 10 Further reading 11 External links LifeEdit   Horatii Flacci Sermonum (1577) Horace can be regarded as the world's first autobiographer.[3] In his writings, he tells us far more about himself, his character, his development, and his way of life, than any other great poet of antiquity. Some of the biographical material contained in his work can be supplemented from the short but valuable "Life of Horace" by Suetonius (in his Lives of the Poets).[4] ChildhoodEdit He was born on 8 December 65 BC[nb 4] in the Samnite south of Italy.[5] His home town, Venusia, lay on a trade route in the border region between Apulia and Lucania (Basilicata). Various Italic dialects were spoken in the area and this perhaps enriched his feeling for language. He could have been familiar with Greek words even as a young boy and later he poked fun at the jargon of mixed Greek and Oscan spoken in neighbouring Canusium.[6] One of the works he probably studied in school was the Odyssia of Livius Andronicus, taught by teachers like the 'Orbilius' mentioned in one of his poems.[7] Army veterans could have been settled there at the expense of local families uprooted by Rome as punishment for their part in the Social War (91–88 BC).[8] Such state-sponsored migration must have added still more linguistic variety to the area. According to a local tradition reported by Horace,[9] a colony of Romans or Latins had been installed in Venusia after the Samnites had been driven out early in the third century. In that case, young Horace could have felt himself to be a Roman[10][11] though there are also indications that he regarded himself as a Samnite or Sabellus by birth.[12][13] Italians in modern and ancient times have always been devoted to their home towns, even after success in the wider world, and Horace was no different. Images of his childhood setting and references to it are found throughout his poems.[14] Horace's father was probably a Venutian taken captive by Romans in the Social War, or possibly he was descended from a Sabine captured in the Samnite Wars. Either way, he was a slave for at least part of his life. He was evidently a man of strong abilities however and managed to gain his freedom and improve his social position. Thus Horace claimed to be the free-born son of a prosperous 'coactor'.[15] The term 'coactor' could denote various roles, such as tax collector, but its use by Horace[16] was explained by scholia as a reference to 'coactor argentareus' i.e. an auctioneer with some of the functions of a banker, paying the seller out of his own funds and later recovering the sum with interest from the buyer.[17] The father spent a small fortune on his son's education, eventually accompanying him to Rome to oversee his schooling and moral development. The poet later paid tribute to him in a poem[18] that one modern scholar considers the best memorial by any son to his father.[nb 5] The poem includes this passage: If my character is flawed by a few minor faults, but is otherwise decent and moral, if you can point out only a few scattered blemishes on an otherwise immaculate surface, if no one can accuse me of greed, or of prurience, or of profligacy, if I live a virtuous life, free of defilement (pardon, for a moment, my self-praise), and if I am to my friends a good friend, my father deserves all the credit... As it is now, he deserves from me unstinting gratitude and praise. I could never be ashamed of such a father, nor do I feel any need, as many people do, to apologize for being a freedman's son. Satires 1.6.65–92 He never mentioned his mother in his verses and he might not have known much about her. Perhaps she also had been a slave.[15] AdulthoodEdit Horace left Rome, possibly after his father's death, and continued his formal education in Athens, a great centre of learning in the ancient world, where he arrived at nineteen years of age, enrolling in The Academy. Founded by Plato, The Academy was now dominated by Epicureans and Stoics, whose theories and practises made a deep impression on the young man from Venusia.[19] Meanwhile, he mixed and lounged about with the elite of Roman youth, such as Marcus, the idle son of Cicero, and the Pompeius to whom he later addressed a poem.[20] It was in Athens too that he probably acquired deep familiarity with the ancient tradition of Greek lyric poetry, at that time largely the preserve of grammarians and academic specialists (access to such material was easier in Athens than in Rome, where the public libraries had yet to be built by Asinius Pollio and Augustus).[21] Rome's troubles following the assassination of Julius Caesar were soon to catch up with him. Marcus Junius Brutus came to Athens seeking support for the republican cause. Brutus was fêted around town in grand receptions and he made a point of attending academic lectures, all the while recruiting supporters among the young men studying there, including Horace.[22] An educated young Roman could begin military service high in the ranks and Horace was made tribunus militum (one of six senior officers of a typical legion), a post usually reserved for men of senatorial or equestrian rank and which seems to have inspired jealousy among his well-born confederates.[23][24] He learned the basics of military life while on the march, particularly in the wilds of northern Greece, whose rugged scenery became a backdrop to some of his later poems.[25] It was there in 42 BC that Octavian (later Augustus) and his associate Mark Antony crushed the republican forces at the Battle of Philippi. Horace later recorded it as a day of embarrassment for himself, when he fled without his shield,[26] but allowance should be made for his self-deprecating humour. Moreover, the incident allowed him to identify himself with some famous poets who had long ago abandoned their shields in battle, notably his heroes Alcaeus and Archilochus. The comparison with the latter poet is uncanny: Archilochus lost his shield in a part of Thrace near Philippi, and he was deeply involved in the Greek colonization of Thasos, where Horace's die-hard comrades finally surrendered.[24] Octavian offered an early amnesty to his opponents and Horace quickly accepted it. On returning to Italy, he was confronted with yet another loss: his father's estate in Venusia was one of many throughout Italy to be confiscated for the settlement of veterans (Virgil lost his estate in the north about the same time). Horace later claimed that he was reduced to poverty and this led him to try his hand at poetry.[27] In reality, there was no money to be had from versifying. At best, it offered future prospects through contacts with other poets and their patrons among the rich.[28] Meanwhile, he obtained the sinecure of scriba quaestorius, a civil service position at the aerarium or Treasury, profitable enough to be purchased even by members of the ordo equester and not very demanding in its work-load, since tasks could be delegated to scribae or permanent clerks.[29] It was about this time that he began writing his Satires and Epodes. PoetEdit   Horace reads before Maecenas, by Fyodor Bronnikov The Epodes belong to iambic poetry. Iambic poetry features insulting and obscene language;[30][31] sometimes, it is referred to as blame poetry.[32] Blame poetry, or shame poetry, is poetry written to blame and shame fellow citizens into a sense of their social obligations. Horace modelled these poems on the poetry of Archilochus. Social bonds in Rome had been decaying since the destruction of Carthage a little more than a hundred years earlier, due to the vast wealth that could be gained by plunder and corruption.[33] These social ills were magnified by rivalry between Julius Caesar, Mark Antony and confederates like Sextus Pompey, all jockeying for a bigger share of the spoils. One modern scholar has counted a dozen civil wars in the hundred years leading up to 31 BC, including the Spartacus rebellion, eight years before Horace's birth.[34] As the heirs to Hellenistic culture, Horace and his fellow Romans were not well prepared to deal with these problems: At bottom, all the problems that the times were stirring up were of a social nature, which the Hellenistic thinkers were ill qualified to grapple with. Some of them censured oppression of the poor by the rich, but they gave no practical lead, though they may have hoped to see well-meaning rulers doing so. Philosophy was drifting into absorption in self, a quest for private contentedness, to be achieved by self-control and restraint, without much regard for the fate of a disintegrating community. — V. G. Kiernan[35] Horace's Hellenistic background is clear in his Satires, even though the genre was unique to Latin literature. He brought to it a style and outlook suited to the social and ethical issues confronting Rome but he changed its role from public, social engagement to private meditation.[36] Meanwhile, he was beginning to interest Octavian's supporters, a gradual process described by him in one of his satires.[18] The way was opened for him by his friend, the poet Virgil, who had gained admission into the privileged circle around Maecenas, Octavian's lieutenant, following the success of his Eclogues. An introduction soon followed and, after a discreet interval, Horace too was accepted. He depicted the process as an honourable one, based on merit and mutual respect, eventually leading to true friendship, and there is reason to believe that his relationship was genuinely friendly, not just with Maecenas but afterwards with Augustus as well.[37] On the other hand, the poet has been unsympathetically described by one scholar as "a sharp and rising young man, with an eye to the main chance."[38] There were advantages on both sides: Horace gained encouragement and material support, the politicians gained a hold on a potential dissident.[39] His republican sympathies, and his role at Philippi, may have caused him some pangs of remorse over his new status. However most Romans considered the civil wars to be the result of contentio dignitatis, or rivalry between the foremost families of the city, and he too seems to have accepted the principate as Rome's last hope for much needed peace.[40] In 37 BC, Horace accompanied Maecenas on a journey to Brundisium, described in one of his poems[41] as a series of amusing incidents and charming encounters with other friends along the way, such as Virgil. In fact the journey was political in its motivation, with Maecenas en route to negotiatie the Treaty of Tarentum with Antony, a fact Horace artfully keeps from the reader (political issues are largely avoided in the first book of satires).[39] Horace was probably also with Maecenas on one of Octavian's naval expeditions against the piratical Sextus Pompeius, which ended in a disastrous storm off Palinurus in 36 BC, briefly alluded to by Horace in terms of near-drowning.[42][nb 6] There are also some indications in his verses that he was with Maecenas at the Battle of Actium in 31 BC, where Octavian defeated his great rival, Antony.[43][nb 7] By then Horace had already received from Maecenas the famous gift of his Sabine farm, probably not long after the publication of the first book of Satires. The gift, which included income from five tenants, may have ended his career at the Treasury, or at least allowed him to give it less time and energy.[44] It signalled his identification with the Octavian regime yet, in the second book of Satires that soon followed, he continued the apolitical stance of the first book. By this time, he had attained the status of eques Romanus,[45] perhaps as a result of his work at the Treasury.[46] KnightEdit Odes 1–3 were the next focus for his artistic creativity. He adapted their forms and themes from Greek lyric poetry of the seventh and sixth centuries BC. The fragmented nature of the Greek world had enabled his literary heroes to express themselves freely and his semi-retirement from the Treasury in Rome to his own estate in the Sabine hills perhaps empowered him to some extent also[47] yet even when his lyrics touched on public affairs they reinforced the importance of private life.[1] Nevertheless, his work in the period 30–27 BC began to show his closeness to the regime and his sensitivity to its developing ideology. In Odes 1.2, for example, he eulogized Octavian in hyperboles that echo Hellenistic court poetry. The name Augustus, which Octavian assumed in January 27 BC, is first attested in Odes 3.3 and 3.5. In the period 27–24 BC, political allusions in the Odes concentrated on foreign wars in Britain (1.35), Arabia (1.29) Spain (3.8) and Parthia (2.2). He greeted Augustus on his return to Rome in 24 BC as a beloved ruler upon whose good health he depended for his own happiness (3.14).[48] The public reception of Odes 1–3 disappointed him, however. He attributed the lack of success to jealousy among imperial courtiers and to his isolation from literary cliques.[49] Perhaps it was disappointment that led him to put aside the genre in favour of verse letters. He addressed his first book of Epistles to a variety of friends and acquaintances in an urbane style reflecting his new social status as a knight. In the opening poem, he professed a deeper interest in moral philosophy than poetry[50] but, though the collection demonstrates a leaning towards stoic theory, it reveals no sustained thinking about ethics.[51] Maecenas was still the dominant confidante but Horace had now begun to assert his own independence, suavely declining constant invitations to attend his patron.[52] In the final poem of the first book of Epistles, he revealed himself to be forty-four years old in the consulship of Lollius and Lepidus i.e. 21 BC, and "of small stature, fond of the sun, prematurely grey, quick-tempered but easily placated".[53][54] According to Suetonius, the second book of Epistles was prompted by Augustus, who desired a verse epistle to be addressed to himself. Augustus was in fact a prolific letter-writer and he once asked Horace to be his personal secretary. Horace refused the secretarial role but complied with the emperor's request for a verse letter.[55] The letter to Augustus may have been slow in coming, being published possibly as late as 11 BC. It celebrated, among other things, the 15 BC military victories of his stepsons, Drusus and Tiberius, yet it and the following letter[56] were largely devoted to literary theory and criticism. The literary theme was explored still further in Ars Poetica, published separately but written in the form of an epistle and sometimes referred to as Epistles 2.3 (possibly the last poem he ever wrote).[57] He was also commissioned to write odes commemorating the victories of Drusus and Tiberius[58] and one to be sung in a temple of Apollo for the Secular Games, a long-abandoned festival that Augustus revived in accordance with his policy of recreating ancient customs (Carmen Saeculare). Suetonius recorded some gossip about Horace's sexual activities late in life, claiming that the walls of his bedchamber were covered with obscene pictures and mirrors, so that he saw erotica wherever he looked.[nb 8] The poet died at 56 years of age, not long after his friend Maecenas, near whose tomb he was laid to rest. Both men bequeathed their property to Augustus, an honour that the emperor expected of his friends.[59] WorksEdit   Odes 1.14 – Wall poem in Leiden The dating of Horace's works isn't known precisely and scholars often debate the exact order in which they were first 'published'. There are persuasive arguments for the following chronology:[60] Satires 1 (c. 35–34 BC) Satires 2 (c. 30 BC) Epodes (30 BC) Odes 1–3 (c. 23 BC)[nb 9] Epistles 1 (c. 21 BC) Carmen Saeculare (17 BC) Epistles 2 (c. 11 BC)[nb 10] Odes 4 (c. 11 BC) Ars Poetica (c. 10–8 BC)[nb 11] Historical contextEdit Horace composed in traditional metres borrowed from Archaic Greece, employing hexameters in his Satires and Epistles, and iambs in his Epodes, all of which were relatively easy to adapt into Latin forms. His Odes featured more complex measures, including alcaics and sapphics, which were sometimes a difficult fit for Latin structure and syntax. Despite these traditional metres, he presented himself as a partisan in the development of a new and sophisticated style. He was influenced in particular by Hellenistic aesthetics of brevity, elegance and polish, as modelled in the work of Callimachus.[61] As soon as Horace, stirred by his own genius and encouraged by the example of Virgil, Varius, and perhaps some other poets of the same generation, had determined to make his fame as a poet, being by temperament a fighter, he wanted to fight against all kinds of prejudice, amateurish slovenliness, philistinism, reactionary tendencies, in short to fight for the new and noble type of poetry which he and his friends were endeavouring to bring about. — Eduard Fraenkel[62] In modern literary theory, a distinction is often made between immediate personal experience (Urerlebnis) and experience mediated by cultural vectors such as literature, philosophy and the visual arts (Bildungserlebnis).[63] The distinction has little relevance for Horace[citation needed] however since his personal and literary experiences are implicated in each other. Satires 1.5, for example, recounts in detail a real trip Horace made with Virgil and some of his other literary friends, and which parallels a Satire by Lucilius, his predecessor.[64] Unlike much Hellenistic-inspired literature, however, his poetry was not composed for a small coterie of admirers and fellow poets, nor does it rely on abstruse allusions for many of its effects. Though elitist in its literary standards, it was written for a wide audience, as a public form of art.[65] Ambivalence also characterizes his literary persona, since his presentation of himself as part of a small community of philosophically aware people, seeking true peace of mind while shunning vices like greed, was well adapted to Augustus's plans to reform public morality, corrupted by greed—his personal plea for moderation was part of the emperor's grand message to the nation.[66] Horace generally followed the examples of poets established as classics in different genres, such as Archilochus in the Epodes, Lucilius in the Satires and Alcaeus in the Odes, later broadening his scope for the sake of variation and because his models weren't actually suited to the realities confronting him. Archilochus and Alcaeus were aristocratic Greeks whose poetry had a social and religious function that was immediately intelligible to their audiences but which became a mere artifice or literary motif when transposed to Rome. However, the artifice of the Odes is also integral to their success, since they could now accommodate a wide range of emotional effects, and the blend of Greek and Roman elements adds a sense of detachment and universality.[67] Horace proudly claimed to introduce into Latin the spirit and iambic poetry of Archilochus but (unlike Archilochus) without persecuting anyone (Epistles 1.19.23–25). It was no idle boast. His Epodes were modelled on the verses of the Greek poet, as 'blame poetry', yet he avoided targeting real scapegoats. Whereas Archilochus presented himself as a serious and vigorous opponent of wrong-doers, Horace aimed for comic effects and adopted the persona of a weak and ineffectual critic of his times (as symbolized for example in his surrender to the witch Canidia in the final epode).[68] He also claimed to be the first to introduce into Latin the lyrical methods of Alcaeus (Epistles 1.19.32–33) and he actually was the first Latin poet to make consistent use of Alcaic meters and themes: love, politics and the symposium. He imitated other Greek lyric poets as well, employing a 'motto' technique, beginning each ode with some reference to a Greek original and then diverging from it.[69] The satirical poet Lucilius was a senator's son who could castigate his peers with impunity. Horace was a mere freedman's son who had to tread carefully.[70] Lucilius was a rugged patriot and a significant voice in Roman self-awareness, endearing himself to his countrymen by his blunt frankness and explicit politics. His work expressed genuine freedom or libertas. His style included 'metrical vandalism' and looseness of structure. Horace instead adopted an oblique and ironic style of satire, ridiculing stock characters and anonymous targets. His libertas was the private freedom of a philosophical outlook, not a political or social privilege.[71] His Satires are relatively easy-going in their use of meter (relative to the tight lyric meters of the Odes)[72] but formal and highly controlled relative to the poems of Lucilius, whom Horace mocked for his sloppy standards (Satires 1.10.56–61)[nb 12] The Epistles may be considered among Horace's most innovative works. There was nothing like it in Greek or Roman literature. Occasionally poems had had some resemblance to letters, including an elegiac poem from Solon to Mimnermus and some lyrical poems from Pindar to Hieron of Syracuse. Lucilius had composed a satire in the form of a letter, and some epistolary poems were composed by Catullus and Propertius. But nobody before Horace had ever composed an entire collection of verse letters,[73] let alone letters with a focus on philosophical problems. The sophisticated and flexible style that he had developed in his Satires was adapted to the more serious needs of this new genre.[74] Such refinement of style was not unusual for Horace. His craftsmanship as a wordsmith is apparent even in his earliest attempts at this or that kind of poetry, but his handling of each genre tended to improve over time as he adapted it to his own needs.[70] Thus for example it is generally agreed that his second book of Satires, where human folly is revealed through dialogue between characters, is superior to the first, where he propounds his ethics in monologues. Nevertheless, the first book includes some of his most popular poems.[75] ThemesEdit Horace developed a number of inter-related themes throughout his poetic career, including politics, love, philosophy and ethics, his own social role, as well as poetry itself. His Epodes and Satires are forms of 'blame poetry' and both have a natural affinity with the moralising and diatribes of Cynicism. This often takes the form of allusions to the work and philosophy of Bion of Borysthenes [nb 13] but it is as much a literary game as a philosophical alignment. By the time he composed his Epistles, he was a critic of Cynicism along with all impractical and "high-falutin" philosophy in general.[nb 14][76] The Satires also include a strong element of Epicureanism, with frequent allusions to the Epicurean poet Lucretius.[nb 15] So for example the Epicurean sentiment carpe diem is the inspiration behind Horace's repeated punning on his own name (Horatius ~ hora) in Satires 2.6.[77] The Satires also feature some Stoic, Peripatetic and Platonic (Dialogues) elements. In short, the Satires present a medley of philosophical programs, dished up in no particular order—a style of argument typical of the genre.[78] The Odes display a wide range of topics. Over time, he becomes more confident about his political voice.[79] Although he is often thought of as an overly intellectual lover, he is ingenious in representing passion.[80] The "Odes" weave various philosophical strands together, with allusions and statements of doctrine present in about a third of the Odes Books 1–3, ranging from the flippant (1.22, 3.28) to the solemn (2.10, 3.2, 3.3). Epicureanism is the dominant influence, characterizing about twice as many of these odes as Stoicism. A group of odes combines these two influences in tense relationships, such as Odes 1.7, praising Stoic virility and devotion to public duty while also advocating private pleasures among friends. While generally favouring the Epicurean lifestyle, the lyric poet is as eclectic as the satiric poet, and in Odes 2.10 even proposes Aristotle's golden mean as a remedy for Rome's political troubles.[81] Many of Horace's poems also contain much reflection on genre, the lyric tradition, and the function of poetry.[82] Odes 4, thought to be composed at the emperor's request, takes the themes of the first three books of "Odes" to a new level. This book shows greater poetic confidence after the public performance of his "Carmen saeculare" or "Century hymn" at a public festival orchestrated by Augustus. In it, Horace addresses the emperor Augustus directly with more confidence and proclaims his power to grant poetic immortality to those he praises. It is the least philosophical collection of his verses, excepting the twelfth ode, addressed to the dead Virgil as if he were living. In that ode, the epic poet and the lyric poet are aligned with Stoicism and Epicureanism respectively, in a mood of bitter-sweet pathos.[83] The first poem of the Epistles sets the philosophical tone for the rest of the collection: "So now I put aside both verses and all those other games: What is true and what befits is my care, this my question, this my whole concern." His poetic renunciation of poetry in favour of philosophy is intended to be ambiguous. Ambiguity is the hallmark of the Epistles. It is uncertain if those being addressed by the self-mocking poet-philosopher are being honoured or criticized. Though he emerges as an Epicurean, it is on the understanding that philosophical preferences, like political and social choices, are a matter of personal taste. Thus he depicts the ups and downs of the philosophical life more realistically than do most philosophers.[84] ReceptionEdit   Horace, portrayed by Giacomo Di Chirico The reception of Horace's work has varied from one epoch to another and varied markedly even in his own lifetime. Odes 1–3 were not well received when first 'published' in Rome, yet Augustus later commissioned a ceremonial ode for the Centennial Games in 17 BC and also encouraged the publication of Odes 4, after which Horace's reputation as Rome's premier lyricist was assured. His Odes were to become the best received of all his poems in ancient times, acquiring a classic status that discouraged imitation: no other poet produced a comparable body of lyrics in the four centuries that followed[85] (though that might also be attributed to social causes, particularly the parasitism that Italy was sinking into).[86] In the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, ode-writing became highly fashionable in England and a large number of aspiring poets imitated Horace both in English and in Latin.[87] In a verse epistle to Augustus (Epistle 2.1), in 12 BC, Horace argued for classic status to be awarded to contemporary poets, including Virgil and apparently himself.[88] In the final poem of his third book of Odes he claimed to have created for himself a monument more durable than bronze ("Exegi monumentum aere perennius", Carmina 3.30.1). For one modern scholar, however, Horace's personal qualities are more notable than the monumental quality of his achievement: ... when we hear his name we don't really think of a monument. We think rather of a voice which varies in tone and resonance but is always recognizable, and which by its unsentimental humanity evokes a very special blend of liking and respect. — Niall Rudd[89] Yet for men like Wilfred Owen, scarred by experiences of World War I, his poetry stood for discredited values: My friend, you would not tell with such high zest To children ardent for some desperate glory, The Old Lie: Dulce et decorum est Pro patria mori.[nb 16] The same motto, Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori, had been adapted to the ethos of martyrdom in the lyrics of early Christian poets like Prudentius.[90] These preliminary comments touch on a small sample of developments in the reception of Horace's work. More developments are covered epoch by epoch in the following sections. AntiquityEdit Horace's influence can be observed in the work of his near contemporaries, Ovid and Propertius. Ovid followed his example in creating a completely natural style of expression in hexameter verse, and Propertius cheekily mimicked him in his third book of elegies.[nb 17] His Epistles provided them both with a model for their own verse letters and it also shaped Ovid's exile poetry.[nb 18] His influence had a perverse aspect. As mentioned before, the brilliance of his Odes may have discouraged imitation. Conversely, they may have created a vogue for the lyrics of the archaic Greek poet Pindar, due to the fact that Horace had neglected that style of lyric (see Influence and Legacy of Pindar).[91] The iambic genre seems almost to have disappeared after publication of Horace's Epodes. Ovid's Ibis was a rare attempt at the form but it was inspired mainly by Callimachus, and there are some iambic elements in Martial but the main influence there was Catullus.[92] A revival of popular interest in the satires of Lucilius may have been inspired by Horace's criticism of his unpolished style. Both Horace and Lucilius were considered good role-models by Persius, who critiqued his own satires as lacking both the acerbity of Lucillius and the gentler touch of Horace.[nb 19] Juvenal's caustic satire was influenced mainly by Lucilius but Horace by then was a school classic and Juvenal could refer to him respectfully and in a round-about way as "the Venusine lamp".[nb 20] Statius paid homage to Horace by composing one poem in Sapphic and one in Alcaic meter (the verse forms most often associated with Odes), which he included in his collection of occasional poems, Silvae. Ancient scholars wrote commentaries on the lyric meters of the Odes, including the scholarly poet Caesius Bassus. By a process called derivatio, he varied established meters through the addition or omission of syllables, a technique borrowed by Seneca the Younger when adapting Horatian meters to the stage.[93] Horace's poems continued to be school texts into late antiquity. Works attributed to Helenius Acro and Pomponius Porphyrio are the remnants of a much larger body of Horatian scholarship. Porphyrio arranged the poems in non-chronological order, beginning with the Odes, because of their general popularity and their appeal to scholars (the Odes were to retain this privileged position in the medieval manuscript tradition and thus in modern editions also). Horace was often evoked by poets of the fourth century, such as Ausonius and Claudian. Prudentius presented himself as a Christian Horace, adapting Horatian meters to his own poetry and giving Horatian motifs a Christian tone.[nb 21] On the other hand, St Jerome, modelled an uncompromising response to the pagan Horace, observing: "What harmony can there be between Christ and the Devil? What has Horace to do with the Psalter?"[nb 22] By the early sixth century, Horace and Prudentius were both part of a classical heritage that was struggling to survive the disorder of the times. Boethius, the last major author of classical Latin literature, could still take inspiration from Horace, sometimes mediated by Senecan tragedy.[94] It can be argued that Horace's influence extended beyond poetry to dignify core themes and values of the early Christian era, such as self-sufficiency, inner contentment and courage.[nb 23] Middle Ages and RenaissanceEdit   Horace in his Studium: German print of the fifteenth century, summarizing the final ode 4.15 (in praise of Augustus). Classical texts almost ceased being copied in the period between the mid sixth century and the Carolingian revival. Horace's work probably survived in just two or three books imported into northern Europe from Italy. These became the ancestors of six extant manuscripts dated to the ninth century. Two of those six manuscripts are French in origin, one was produced in Alsace, and the other three show Irish influence but were probably written in continental monasteries (Lombardy for example).[95] By the last half of the ninth century, it was not uncommon for literate people to have direct experience of Horace's poetry. His influence on the Carolingian Renaissance can be found in the poems of Heiric of Auxerre[nb 24] and in some manuscripts marked with neumes, mysterious notations that may have been an aid to the memorization and discussion of his lyric meters. Ode 4.11 is neumed with the melody of a hymn to John the Baptist, Ut queant laxis, composed in Sapphic stanzas. This hymn later became the basis of the solfege system (Do, re, mi...)—an association with western music quite appropriate for a lyric poet like Horace, though the language of the hymn is mainly Prudentian.[96] Lyons[97] argues that the melody in question was linked with Horace's Ode well before Guido d'Arezzo fitted Ut queant laxis to it. However, the melody is unlikely to be a survivor from classical times, although Ovid[98] testifies to Horace's use of the lyre while performing his Odes. The German scholar, Ludwig Traube, once dubbed the tenth and eleventh centuries The age of Horace (aetas Horatiana), and placed it between the aetas Vergiliana of the eighth and ninth centuries, and the aetas Ovidiana of the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, a distinction supposed to reflect the dominant classical Latin influences of those times. Such a distinction is over-schematized since Horace was a substantial influence in the ninth century as well. Traube had focused too much on Horace's Satires.[99] Almost all of Horace's work found favour in the Medieval period. In fact medieval scholars were also guilty of over-schematism, associating Horace's different genres with the different ages of man. A twelfth-century scholar encapsulated the theory: "...Horace wrote four different kinds of poems on account of the four ages, the Odes for boys, the Ars Poetica for young men, the Satires for mature men, the Epistles for old and complete men."[100] It was even thought that Horace had composed his works in the order in which they had been placed by ancient scholars.[nb 25] Despite its naivety, the schematism involved an appreciation of Horace's works as a collection, the Ars Poetica, Satires and Epistles appearing to find favour as well as the Odes. The later Middle Ages however gave special significance to Satires and Epistles, being considered Horace's mature works. Dante referred to Horace as Orazio satiro, and he awarded him a privileged position in the first circle of Hell, with Homer, Ovid and Lucan.[101] Horace's popularity is revealed in the large number of quotes from all his works found in almost every genre of medieval literature, and also in the number of poets imitating him in quantitative Latin meter. The most prolific imitator of his Odes was the Bavarian monk, Metellus of Tegernsee, who dedicated his work to the patron saint of Tegernsee Abbey, St Quirinus, around the year 1170. He imitated all Horace's lyrical meters then followed these up with imitations of other meters used by Prudentius and Boethius, indicating that variety, as first modelled by Horace, was considered a fundamental aspect of the lyric genre. The content of his poems however was restricted to simple piety.[102] Among the most successful imitators of Satires and Epistles was another Germanic author, calling himself Sextus Amarcius, around 1100, who composed four books, the first two exemplifying vices, the second pair mainly virtues.[103] Petrarch is a key figure in the imitation of Horace in accentual meters. His verse letters in Latin were modelled on the Epistles and he wrote a letter to Horace in the form of an ode. However he also borrowed from Horace when composing his Italian sonnets. One modern scholar has speculated that authors who imitated Horace in accentual rhythms (including stressed Latin and vernacular languages) may have considered their work a natural sequel to Horace's metrical variety.[104] In France, Horace and Pindar were the poetic models for a group of vernacular authors called the Pléiade, including for example Pierre de Ronsard and Joachim du Bellay. Montaigne made constant and inventive use of Horatian quotes.[105] The vernacular languages were dominant in Spain and Portugal in the sixteenth century, where Horace's influence is notable in the works of such authors as Garcilaso de la Vega, Juan Boscán, Sá de Miranda, Antonio Ferreira and Fray Luis de León, the last writing odes on the Horatian theme beatus ille (happy the man).[106] The sixteenth century in western Europe was also an age of translations (except in Germany, where Horace wasn't translated into the vernacular until well into the seventeenth century). The first English translator was Thomas Drant, who placed translations of Jeremiah and Horace side by side in Medicinable Morall, 1566. That was also the year that the Scot George Buchanan paraphrased the Psalms in a Horatian setting. Ben Jonson put Horace on the stage in 1601 in Poetaster, along with other classical Latin authors, giving them all their own verses to speak in translation. Horace's part evinces the independent spirit, moral earnestness and critical insight that many readers look for in his poems.[107] Age of EnlightenmentEdit During the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, or the Age of Enlightenment, neoclassical culture was pervasive. English literature in the middle of that period has been dubbed Augustan. It is not always easy to distinguish Horace's influence during those centuries (the mixing of influences is shown for example in one poet's pseudonym, Horace Juvenal).[nb 26] However a measure of his influence can be found in the diversity of the people interested in his works, both among readers and authors.[108] New editions of his works were published almost yearly. There were three new editions in 1612 (two in Leiden, one in Frankfurt) and again in 1699 (Utrecht, Barcelona, Cambridge). Cheap editions were plentiful and fine editions were also produced, including one whose entire text was engraved by John Pine in copperplate. The poet James Thomson owned five editions of Horace's work and the physician James Douglas had five hundred books with Horace-related titles. Horace was often commended in periodicals such as The Spectator, as a hallmark of good judgement, moderation and manliness, a focus for moralising.[nb 27] His verses offered a fund of mottoes, such as simplex munditiis (elegance in simplicity), splendide mendax (nobly untruthful), sapere aude (dare to know), nunc est bibendum (now is the time to drink), carpe diem (seize the day, perhaps the only one still in common use today).[94] These were quoted even in works as prosaic as Edmund Quincy's A treatise of hemp-husbandry (1765). The fictional hero Tom Jones recited his verses with feeling.[109] His works were also used to justify commonplace themes, such as patriotic obedience, as in James Parry's English lines from an Oxford University collection in 1736:[110] What friendly Muse will teach my Lays To emulate the Roman fire? Justly to sound a Caeser's praise Demands a bold Horatian lyre. Horatian-style lyrics were increasingly typical of Oxford and Cambridge verse collections for this period, most of them in Latin but some like the previous ode in English. John Milton's Lycidas first appeared in such a collection. It has few Horatian echoes[nb 28] yet Milton's associations with Horace were lifelong. He composed a controversial version of Odes 1.5, and Paradise Lost includes references to Horace's 'Roman' Odes 3.1–6 (Book 7 for example begins with echoes of Odes 3.4).[111] Yet Horace's lyrics could offer inspiration to libertines as well as moralists, and neo-Latin sometimes served as a kind of discrete veil for the risqué. Thus for example Benjamin Loveling authored a catalogue of Drury Lane and Covent Garden prostitutes, in Sapphic stanzas, and an encomium for a dying lady "of salacious memory".[112] Some Latin imitations of Horace were politically subversive, such as a marriage ode by Anthony Alsop that included a rallying cry for the Jacobite cause. On the other hand, Andrew Marvell took inspiration from Horace's Odes 1.37 to compose his English masterpiece Horatian Ode upon Cromwell's Return from Ireland, in which subtly nuanced reflections on the execution of Charles I echo Horace's ambiguous response to the death of Cleopatra (Marvell's ode was suppressed in spite of its subtlety and only began to be widely published in 1776). Samuel Johnson took particular pleasure in reading The Odes.[nb 29] Alexander Pope wrote direct Imitations of Horace (published with the original Latin alongside) and also echoed him in Essays and The Rape of the Lock. He even emerged as "a quite Horatian Homer" in his translation of the Iliad.[113] Horace appealed also to female poets, such as Anna Seward (Original sonnets on various subjects, and odes paraphrased from Horace, 1799) and Elizabeth Tollet, who composed a Latin ode in Sapphic meter to celebrate her brother's return from overseas, with tea and coffee substituted for the wine of Horace's sympotic settings: Quos procax nobis numeros, jocosque Musa dictaret? mihi dum tibique Temperent baccis Arabes, vel herbis Pocula Seres[114] What verses and jokes might the bold Muse dictate? while for you and me Arabs flavour our cups with beans Or Chinese with leaves.[115] Horace's Ars Poetica is second only to Aristotle's Poetics in its influence on literary theory and criticism. Milton recommended both works in his treatise of Education.[116] Horace's Satires and Epistles however also had a huge impact, influencing theorists and critics such as John Dryden.[117] There was considerable debate over the value of different lyrical forms for contemporary poets, as represented on one hand by the kind of four-line stanzas made familiar by Horace's Sapphic and Alcaic Odes and, on the other, the loosely structured Pindarics associated with the odes of Pindar. Translations occasionally involved scholars in the dilemmas of censorship. Thus Christopher Smart entirely omitted Odes 4.10 and re-numbered the remaining odes. He also removed the ending of Odes 4.1. Thomas Creech printed Epodes 8 and 12 in the original Latin but left out their English translations. Philip Francis left out both the English and Latin for those same two epodes, a gap in the numbering the only indication that something was amiss. French editions of Horace were influential in England and these too were regularly bowdlerized. Most European nations had their own 'Horaces': thus for example Friedrich von Hagedorn was called The German Horace and Maciej Kazimierz Sarbiewski The Polish Horace (the latter was much imitated by English poets such as Henry Vaughan and Abraham Cowley). Pope Urban VIII wrote voluminously in Horatian meters, including an ode on gout.[118] 19th century onEdit Horace maintained a central role in the education of English-speaking elites right up until the 1960s.[119] A pedantic emphasis on the formal aspects of language-learning at the expense of literary appreciation may have made him unpopular in some quarters[120] yet it also confirmed his influence—a tension in his reception that underlies Byron's famous lines from Childe Harold (Canto iv, 77):[121] Then farewell, Horace, whom I hated so Not for thy faults, but mine; it is a curse To understand, not feel thy lyric flow, To comprehend, but never love thy verse. William Wordsworth's mature poetry, including the preface to Lyrical Ballads, reveals Horace's influence in its rejection of false ornament[122] and he once expressed "a wish / to meet the shade of Horace...".[nb 30] John Keats echoed the opening of Horace's Epodes 14 in the opening lines of Ode to a Nightingale.[nb 31] The Roman poet was presented in the nineteenth century as an honorary English gentleman. William Thackeray produced a version of Odes 1.38 in which Horace's 'boy' became 'Lucy', and Gerard Manley Hopkins translated the boy innocently as 'child'. Horace was translated by Sir Theodore Martin (biographer of Prince Albert) but minus some ungentlemanly verses, such as the erotic Odes 1.25 and Epodes 8 and 12. Edward Bulwer-Lytton produced a popular translation and William Gladstone also wrote translations during his last days as Prime Minister.[123] Edward FitzGerald's Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam, though formally derived from the Persian ruba'i, nevertheless shows a strong Horatian influence, since, as one modern scholar has observed, "...the quatrains inevitably recall the stanzas of the 'Odes', as does the narrating first person of the world-weary, ageing Epicurean Omar himself, mixing sympotic exhortation and 'carpe diem' with splendid moralising and 'memento mori' nihilism."[nb 32] Matthew Arnold advised a friend in verse not to worry about politics, an echo of Odes 2.11, yet later became a critic of Horace's inadequacies relative to Greek poets, as role models of Victorian virtues, observing: "If human life were complete without faith, without enthusiasm, without energy, Horace...would be the perfect interpreter of human life."[124] Christina Rossetti composed a sonnet depicting a woman willing her own death steadily, drawing on Horace's depiction of 'Glycera' in Odes 1.19.5–6 and Cleopatra in Odes 1.37.[nb 33] A. E. Housman considered Odes 4.7, in Archilochian couplets, the most beautiful poem of antiquity[125] and yet he generally shared Horace's penchant for quatrains, being readily adapted to his own elegiac and melancholy strain.[126] The most famous poem of Ernest Dowson took its title and its heroine's name from a line of Odes 4.1, Non sum qualis eram bonae sub regno Cynarae, as well as its motif of nostalgia for a former flame. Kipling wrote a famous parody of the Odes, satirising their stylistic idiosyncrasies and especially the extraordinary syntax, but he also used Horace's Roman patriotism as a focus for British imperialism, as in the story Regulus in the school collection Stalky & Co., which he based on Odes 3.5.[127] Wilfred Owen's famous poem, quoted above, incorporated Horatian text to question patriotism while ignoring the rules of Latin scansion. However, there were few other echoes of Horace in the war period, possibly because war is not actually a major theme of Horace's work.[128]   Bibendum (the symbol of the Michelin tyre company) takes his name from the opening line of Ode 1.37, Nunc est bibendum. Both W.H.Auden and Louis MacNeice began their careers as teachers of classics and both responded as poets to Horace's influence. Auden for example evoked the fragile world of the 1930s in terms echoing Odes 2.11.1–4, where Horace advises a friend not to let worries about frontier wars interfere with current pleasures. And, gentle, do not care to know Where Poland draws her Eastern bow,      What violence is done; Nor ask what doubtful act allows Our freedom in this English house,      Our picnics in the sun.[nb 34] The American poet, Robert Frost, echoed Horace's Satires in the conversational and sententious idiom of some of his longer poems, such as The Lesson for Today (1941), and also in his gentle advocacy of life on the farm, as in Hyla Brook (1916), evoking Horace's fons Bandusiae in Ode 3.13. Now at the start of the third millennium, poets are still absorbing and re-configuring the Horatian influence, sometimes in translation (such as a 2002 English/American edition of the Odes by thirty-six poets)[nb 35] and sometimes as inspiration for their own work (such as a 2003 collection of odes by a New Zealand poet).[nb 36] Horace's Epodes have largely been ignored in the modern era, excepting those with political associations of historical significance. The obscene qualities of some of the poems have repulsed even scholars[nb 37] yet more recently a better understanding of the nature of Iambic poetry has led to a re-evaluation of the whole collection.[129][130] A re-appraisal of the Epodes also appears in creative adaptations by recent poets (such as a 2004 collection of poems that relocates the ancient context to a 1950s industrial town).[nb 38] TranslationsEdit John Dryden successfully adapted three of the Odes (and one Epode) into verse for readers of his own age. Samuel Johnson favored the versions of Philip Francis. Others favor unrhymed translations. In 1964 James Michie published a translation of the Odes—many of them fully rhymed—including a dozen of the poems in the original Sapphic and Alcaic metres. More recent verse translations of the Odes include those by David West (free verse), and Colin Sydenham (rhymed). Ars Poetica was first translated into English by Ben Jonson and later by Lord Byron. Horace's Odes and the Mystery of Do-Re-Mi Stuart Lyons (rhymed) Aris & Phillips ISBN 978-0-85668-790-7 In popular cultureEdit The Oxford Latin Course textbooks use the life of Horace to illustrate an average Roman's life in the late Republic to Early Empire.[131] See alsoEdit  Literature portal  Ancient Rome portal  Biography portal Carpe diem Horatia (gens) List of ancient Romans Otium Prosody (Latin) Translation NotesEdit ^ Quintilian 10.1.96. The only other lyrical poet Quintilian thought comparable with Horace was the now obscure poet/metrical theorist, Caesius Bassus (R. Tarrant, Ancient Receptions of Horace, 280) ^ Translated from Persius' own 'Satires' 1.116–17: "omne vafer vitium ridenti Flaccus amico / tangit et admissus circum praecordia ludit." ^ Quoted by N. Rudd from John Dryden's Discourse Concerning the Original and Progress of Satire, excerpted from W.P.Ker's edition of Dryden's essays, Oxford 1926, vol. 2, pp. 86–87 ^ The year is given in Odes 3.21.1 ("Consule Manlio"), the month in Epistles 1.20.27, the day in Suetonius' biography Vita (R. Nisbet, Horace: life and chronology, 7) ^ "No son ever set a finer monument to his father than Horace did in the sixth satire of Book I...Horace's description of his father is warm-hearted but free from sentimentality or exaggeration. We see before us one of the common people, a hard-working, open-minded, and thoroughly honest man of simple habits and strict convictions, representing some of the best qualities that at the end of the Republic could still be found in the unsophisticated society of the Italian municipia" — E. Fraenkel, Horace, 5–6 ^ Odes 3.4.28: "nec (me extinxit) Sicula Palinurus unda"; "nor did Palinurus extinguish me with Sicilian waters". Maecenas' involvement is recorded by Appian Bell. Civ. 5.99 but Horace's ode is the only historical reference to his own presence there, depending however on interpretation. (R. Nisbet, Horace: life and chronology, 10) ^ The point is much disputed among scholars and hinges on how the text is interpreted. Epodes 9 for example may offer proof of Horace's presence if 'ad hunc frementis' ('gnashing at this' man i.e. the traitrous Roman ) is a misreading of 'at huc...verterent' (but hither...they fled) in lines describing the defection of the Galatian cavalry, "ad hunc frementis verterunt bis mille equos / Galli canentes Caesarem" (R. Nisbet, Horace: life and chronology, 12). ^ Suetonius signals that the report is based on rumours by employing the terms "traditur...dicitur" / "it is reported...it is said" (E. Fraenkel, Horace, 21) ^ According to a recent theory, the three books of Odes were issued separately, possibly in 26, 24 and 23 BC (see G. Hutchinson (2002), Classical Quarterly 52: 517–37) ^ 19 BC is the usual estimate but c. 11 BC has good support too (see R. Nisbet, Horace: life and chronology, 18–20 ^ The date however is subject to much controversy with 22–18 BC another option (see for example R. Syme, The Augustan Aristocracy, 379–81 ^ "[Lucilius]...resembles a man whose only concern is to force / something into the framework of six feet, and who gaily produces / two hundred lines before dinner and another two hundred after." – Satire 1.10.59–61 (translated by Niall Rudd, The Satires of Horace and Persius, Penguin Classics 1973, p. 69) ^ There is one reference to Bion by name in Epistles 2.2.60, and the clearest allusion to him is in Satire 1.6, which parallels Bion fragments 1, 2, 16 Kindstrand ^ Epistles 1.17 and 1.18.6–8 are critical of the extreme views of Diogenes and also of social adaptations of Cynic precepts, and yet Epistle 1.2 could be either Cynic or Stoic in its orientation (J. Moles, Philosophy and ethics, p. 177 ^ Satires 1.1.25–26, 74–75, 1.2.111–12, 1.3.76–77, 97–114, 1.5.44, 101–03, 1.6.128–31, 2.2.14–20, 25, 2.6.93–97 ^ Wilfred Owen, Dulce et decorum est (1917), echoes a line from Carmina 3.2.13, "it is sweet and honourable to die for one's country", cited by Stephen Harrison, The nineteenth and twentieth centuries, 340. ^ Propertius published his third book of elegies within a year or two of Horace's Odes 1–3 and mimicked him, for example, in the opening lines, characterizing himself in terms borrowed from Odes 3.1.13 and 3.30.13–14, as a priest of the Muses and as an adaptor of Greek forms of poetry (R. Tarrant, Ancient receptions of Horace, 227) ^ Ovid for example probably borrowed from Horace's Epistle 1.20 the image of a poetry book as a slave boy eager to leave home, adapting it to the opening poems of Tristia 1 and 3 (R. Tarrant, Ancient receptions of Horace), and Tristia 2 may be understood as a counterpart to Horace's Epistles 2.1, both being letters addressed to Augustus on literary themes (A. Barchiesi, Speaking Volumes, 79–103) ^ The comment is in Persius 1.114–18, yet that same satire has been found to have nearly 80 reminiscences of Horace; see D. Hooley, The Knotted Thong, 29 ^ The allusion to Venusine comes via Horace's Sermones 2.1.35, while lamp signifies the lucubrations of a conscientious poet. According to Quintilian (93), however, many people in Flavian Rome preferred Lucilius not only to Horace but to all other Latin poets (R. Tarrant, Ancient receptions of Horace, 279) ^ Prudentius sometimes alludesto the Odes in a negative context, as expressions of a secular life he is abandoning. Thus for example male pertinax, employed in Prudentius's Praefatio to describe a willful desire for victory, is lifted from Odes 1.9.24, where it describes a girl's half-hearted resistance to seduction. Elsewhere he borrows dux bone from Odes 4.5.5 and 37, where it refers to Augustus, and applies it to Christ (R. Tarrant, Ancient receptions of Horace, 282 ^ St Jerome, Epistles 22.29, incorporating a quote from 2 'Corinthians 6.14: qui consensus Christo et Belial? quid facit cum psalterio Horatius?(cited by K. Friis-Jensen, Horace in the Middle Ages, 292) ^ Odes 3.3.1–8 was especially influential in promoting the value of heroic calm in the face of danger, describing a man who could bear even the collapse of the world without fear (si fractus illabatur orbis,/impavidum ferient ruinae). Echoes are found in Seneca's Agamemnon 593–603, Prudentius's Peristephanon 4.5–12 and Boethius's Consolatio 1 metrum 4.(R. Tarrant, Ancient receptions of Horace, 283–85) ^ Heiric, like Prudentius, gave Horatian motifs a Christian context. Thus the character Lydia in Odes 3.19.15, who would willingly die for her lover twice, becomes in Heiric's Life of St Germaine of Auxerre a saint ready to die twice for the Lord's commandments (R. Tarrant, Ancient receptions of Horace, 287–88) ^ According to a medieval French commentary on the Satires: "...first he composed his lyrics, and in them, speaking to the young, as it were, he took as subject-matter love affairs and quarrels, banquets and drinking parties. Next he wrote his Epodes, and in them composed invectives against men of a more advanced and more dishonourable age...He next wrote his book about the Ars Poetica, and in that instructed men of his own profession to write well...Later he added his book of Satires, in which he reproved those who had fallen a prey to various kinds of vices. Finally, he finished his oeuvre with the Epistles, and in them, following the method of a good farmer, he sowed the virtues where he had rooted out the vices." (cited by K. Friis-Jensen, Horace in the Middle Ages, 294–302) ^ 'Horace Juvenal' was author of Modern manners: a poem, 1793 ^ see for example Spectator 312, 27 Feb. 1712; 548, 28 Nov. 1712; 618, 10 Nov. 1714 ^ One echo of Horace may be found in line 69: "Were it not better done as others use,/ To sport with Amaryllis in the shade/Or with the tangles of Neaera's hair?", which points to the Neara in Odes 3.14.21 (Douglas Bush, Milton: Poetical Works, 144, note 69) ^ Cfr. James Boswell, "The Life of Samuel Johnson" Aetat. 20, 1729 where Boswell remarked of Johnson that Horace's Odes "were the compositions in which he took most delight." ^ The quote, from Memorials of a Tour of Italy (1837), contains allusions to Odes 3.4 and 3.13 (S. Harrison, The nineteenth and twentieth centuries, 334–35) ^ "My heart aches, and a drowsy numbness pains / my sense..." echoes Epodes 14.1–4 (S. Harrison, The nineteenth and twentieth centuries, 335) ^ Comment by S. Harrison, editor and contributor to The Cambridge Companion to Horace (S. Harrison, The nineteenth and twentieth centuries, 337 ^ Rossetti's sonnet, A Study (a soul), dated 1854, was not published in her own lifetime. Some lines: She stands as pale as Parian marble stands / Like Cleopatra when she turns at bay... (C. Rossetti, Complete Poems, 758 ^ Quoted from Auden's poem Out on the lawn I lie in bed, 1933, and cited by S. Harrison, The nineteenth and twentieth centuries, 340 ^ Edited by McClatchy, reviewed by S. Harrison, Bryn Mawr Classical Review 2003.03.05 ^ I. Wedde, The Commonplace Odes, Auckland 2003, (cited by S. Harrison, The nineteenth and twentieth centuries, 345) ^ 'Political' Epodes are 1, 7, 9, 16; notably obscene Epodes are 8 and 12. E. Fraenkel is among the admirers repulsed by these two poems, for another view of which see for example Dee Lesser Clayman, 'Horace's Epodes VIII and XII: More than Clever Obscenity?', The Classical World Vol. 6, No. 1 (September 1975), pp 55–61 JSTOR 4348329 ^ M. Almond, The Works 2004, Washington, cited by S. Harrison, The nineteenth and twentieth centuries, 346 CitationsEdit ^ a b J. Michie, The Odes of Horace, 14 ^ N. Rudd, The Satires of Horace and Persius, 10 ^ R. Barrow R., The Romans Pelican Books, 119 ^ Fraenkel, Eduard. Horace. Oxford: 1957, p. 1. For the Life of Horace by Suetonius, see: (Vita Horati) ^ Brill's Companion to Horace, edited by Hans-Christian Günther, Brill, 2012, p. 7, Google Book ^ Satires 1.10.30 ^ Epistles 2.1.69 ff. ^ E. Fraenkel, Horace, 2–3 ^ Satires 2.1.34 ^ T. Frank, Catullus and Horace, 133–34 ^ A. Campbell, Horace: A New Interpretation, 84 ^ Epistles 1.16.49 ^ R. Nisbet, Horace: life and chronology, 7 ^ E. Fraenkel, Horace, 3–4 ^ a b V. Kiernan, Horace: Poetics and Politics, 24 ^ Satires 1.6.86 ^ E. Fraenkel, Horace, 4–5 ^ a b Satires 1.6 ^ V. Kiernan, Horace: Poetics and Politics, 25 ^ Odes 2.7 ^ E. Fraenkel, Horace, 8–9 ^ E. Fraenkel, Horace, 9–10 ^ Satires 1.6.48 ^ a b R. Nisbet, Horace: life and chronology, 8 ^ V. Kiernan, Horace, 25 ^ Odes 2.7.10 ^ Epistles 2.2.51–52 ^ V. Kiernan, Horace: Poetics and politics ^ E. Fraenkel, Horace, 14–15 ^ Christopher Brown, in A Companion to the Greek Lyric Poets, D.E. Gerber (ed), Leiden 1997, pages 13–88 ^ Douglas E. Gerber, Greek Iambic Poetry, Loeb Classical Library (1999), Introduction pages i–iv ^ D. Mankin, Horace: Epodes, C.U.P., 8 ^ D. Mankin, Horace: Epodes, 6 ^ R. Conway, New Studies of a Great Inheritance, 49–50 ^ V. Kiernan, Horace: Poetics and Politics, 18–19 ^ F. Muecke, The Satires, 109–10 ^ R. Lyne, Augustan Poetry and Society, 599 ^ J. Griffin, Horace in the Thirties, 6 ^ a b R. Nisbet, Horace: life and chronology, 10 ^ D. Mankin, Horace: Epodes, 5 ^ Satires 1.5 ^ Odes 3.4.28 ^ Epodes 1 and 9 ^ E. Fraenkel, Horace, 15 ^ Satires 2.7.53 ^ R. Nisbet, Horace: life and chronology, 11 ^ V. Kiernan, Horace: Poetics and Politics, 61–62 ^ R. Nisbet, Horace: life and chronology, 13 ^ Epistles 1.19.35–44 ^ Epistles 1.1.10 ^ V. Kiernan, Horace: Poetics and Politics, 149, 153 ^ Epistles 1.7 ^ Epistles 1.20.24–25 ^ R. Nisbet, Horace: life and chronology, 14–15 ^ E. Fraenkel, Horace, 17–18 ^ Epistles 2.2 ^ R. Ferri, The Epistles, 121 ^ Odes 4.4 and 4.14 ^ E. Fraenkel, Horace, 23 ^ R Nisbet, Horace: life and chronology, 17–21 ^ S. Harrison, Style and poetic texture, 262 ^ E. Fraenkel, Horace, 124–25 ^ Gundolf, Friedrich (1916). Goethe. Berlin, Germany: Bondi. ^ E. Fraenkel, Horace, 106–07 ^ E. Fraenkel, Horace, 74 ^ E. Fraenkel, Horace, 95–96 ^ J. Griffin, Gods and Religion, 182 ^ S. Harrison, Lyric and Iambic, 192 ^ S. Harrison, Lyric and Iambic, 194–96 ^ a b E. Fraenkel, Horace, 32, 80 ^ L. Morgan, Satire, 177–78 ^ S. Harrison, Style and poetic texture, 271 ^ R. Ferri, The Epistles, pp. 121–22 ^ E. Fraenkel, Horace, p. 309 ^ V. Kiernan, Horace: Poetics and Politics, 28 ^ J. Moles, Philosophy and ethics, pp. 165–69, 177 ^ K. J. Reckford, Some studies in Horace's odes on love ^ J. Moles, Philosophy and ethics, p. 168 ^ Santirocco "Unity and Design", Lowrie "Horace's Narrative Odes" ^ Ancona, "Time and the Erotic" ^ J. Moles, Philosophy and ethics, pp. 171–73 ^ Davis "Polyhymnia" and Lowrie "Horace's Narrative Odes" ^ J. Moles, Philosophy and ethics, p. 179 ^ J. Moles, Philosophy and ethics, pp. 174–80 ^ R. Tarrant, Ancient receptions of Horace, 279 ^ V. Kiernan, Horace: Poetics and Politics, 176 ^ D. Money, The seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, 326, 332 ^ R. Lyme, Augustan Poetry and Society, 603 ^ Niall Rudd, The Satires of Horace and Persius, 14 ^ R. Tarrant, Ancient receptions of Horace, 282–83 ^ R. Tarrant, Ancient receptions of Horace, 280 ^ R. Tarrant, Ancient receptions of Horace, 278 ^ R. Tarrant, Ancient receptions of Horace, 280–81 ^ a b R. Tarrant, Ancient receptions of Horace, 283 ^ R. Tarrant, Ancient receptions of Horace, 285–87 ^ R. Tarrant, Ancient receptions of Horace, 288–89 ^ Stuart Lyons, Horace's Odes and the Mystery of Do-Re-Mi ^ Tristia, 4.10.49–50 ^ B. Bischoff, Living with the satirists, 83–95 ^ K. Friis-Jensen,Horace in the Middle Ages, 291 ^ K. Friis-Jensen, Horace in the Middle Ages, 293, 304 ^ K. Friis-Jensen, Horace in the Middle Ages, 296–98 ^ K. Friis-Jensen, Horace in the Middle Ages, 302 ^ K. Friis-Jensen, Horace in the Middle Ages, 299 ^ Michael McGann, Horace in the Renaissance, 306 ^ E. Rivers, Fray Luis de León: The Original Poems ^ M. McGann, Horace in the Renaissance, 306–07, 313–16 ^ D. Money, The seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, 318, 331, 332 ^ D. Money, The seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, 322 ^ D. Money, The seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, 326–27 ^ J. Talbot, A Horatian Pun in Paradise Lost, 21–3 ^ B. Loveling, Latin and English Poems, 49–52, 79–83 ^ D. Money, The seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, 329–31 ^ E. Tollet, Poems on Several Occasions, 84 ^ Translation adapted from D. Money, The seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, 329 ^ A. Gilbert, Literary Criticism: Plato to Dryden, 124, 669 ^ W. Kupersmith, Roman Satirists in Seventeenth Century England, 97–101 ^ D. Money, The seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, 319–25 ^ S. Harrison, The nineteenth and twentieth centuries, 340 ^ V. Kiernan, Horace: Poetics and Politics, x ^ S. Harrison, The nineteenth and twentieth centuries, 334 ^ D. Money, The seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, 323 ^ S. Harrison, The nineteenth and twentieth centuries, 335–37 ^ M. Arnold, Selected Prose, 74 ^ W. Flesch, Companion to British Poetry, 19th Century, 98 ^ S. Harrison, The nineteenth and twentieth centuries, 339 ^ S. Medcalfe, Kipling's Horace, 217–39 ^ S. Harrison, the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, 340 ^ D. Mankin, Horace: Epodes, 6–9 ^ R. McNeill, Horace, 12 ^ Balme, Maurice, Moorwood, James (1996). Oxford Latin Course Part one. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0195212037. ReferencesEdit Arnold, Matthew (1970). Selected Prose. Penguin Books. ISBN 978-0-14-043058-5. Barrow, R (1949). The Romans. Penguin/Pelican Books. Barchiesi, A (2001). Speaking Volumes: Narrative and Intertext in Ovid and Other Latin Poets. Duckworth. Bischoff, B (1971). "Living with the satirists". Classical Influences on European Culture AD 500–1500. Cambridge University Press. Bush, Douglas (1966). Milton: Poetical Works. Oxford University Press. Campbell, A (1924). Horace: A New Interpretation. London. Conway, R (1921). New Studies of a Great Inheritance. London. Davis, Gregson (1991). Polyhymnia. The Rhetoric to Horatian Lyric Discourse. University of California. Ferri, Rolando (2007). "The Epistles". The Cambridge Companion to Horace. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-53684-4. Flesch, William (2009). The Facts on File Companion to British Poetry, 19th Century. Infobase Publishing. ISBN 978-0-8160-5896-9. Frank, Tenney (1928). Catullus and Horace. New York. Fraenkel, Eduard (1957). Horace. Oxford University Press. Friis-Jensen, Karsten (2007). "Horace in the Middle Ages". The Cambridge Companion to Horace. Cambridge University Press. Griffin, Jasper (1993). "Horace in the Thirties". Horace 2000. Ann Arbor. Griffin, Jasper (2007). "Gods and religion". The Cambridge Companion to Horace. Cambridge university Press. Harrison, Stephen (2005). "Lyric and Iambic". A Companion to Latin Literature. Blackwell Publishing. Harrison, Stephen (2007). "Introduction". The Cambridge Companion to Horace. Cambridge University Press. Harrison, Stephen (2007). "Style and poetic texture". The Cambridge Companion to Horace. Cambridge University Press. Harrison, Stephen (2007). "The nineteenth and twentieth centuries". The Cambridge Companion to Horace. Cambridge University Press. Hooley, D (1997). The Knotted Thong: Structures of Mimesis in Persius. Ann Arbor. Hutchinson, G (2002). "The publication and individuality of Horace's Odes 1–3". Classical Quarterly 52. Kiernan, Victor (1999). Horace: Poetics and Politics. St Martin's Press. Kupersmith, W (1985). Roman Satirists in Seventeenth Century England. Lincoln, Nebraska and London. Loveling, Benjamin (1741). Latin and English Poems, by a Gentleman of Trinity College, Oxford. London. Lowrie, Michèle (1997). Horace's Narrative Odes. Oxford University Press. Lyne, R (1986). "Augustan Poetry and Society". The Oxford History of the Classical World. Oxford University Press. Mankin, David (1995). Horace: Epodes. Cambridge university Press. McNeill, Randall (2010). Horace. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-980511-2. Michie, James (1967). "Horace the Man". The Odes of Horace. Penguin Classics. Moles, John (2007). "Philosophy and ethics". The Cambridge Companion to Horace. Cambridge University Press. Money, David (2007). "The seventeenth and eighteenth centuries". The Cambridge Companion to Horace. Cambridge University Press. Morgan, Llewelyn (2005). "Satire". A Companion to Latin Literature. Blackwell Publishing. Muecke, Frances (2007). "the Satires". The Cambridge Companion to Horace. Cambridge University Press. Nisbet, Robin (2007). "Horace: life and chronology". The Cambridge Companion to Horace. Cambridge University Press. Reckford, K. J. (1997). Horatius: the man and the hour. 118. American Journal of Philology. pp. 538–612. Rivers, Elias (1983). Fray Luis de León: The Original Poems. Grant and Cutler. Rossetti, Christina (2001). The Complete Poems. Penguin Books. Rudd, Niall (1973). The Satires of Horace and Persius. Penguin Classics. Santirocco, Matthew (1986). Unity and Design in Horace's Odes. University of North Carolina. Syme, R (1986). The Augustan Aristocracy. Oxford University Press. Talbot, J (2001). "A Horatian Pun in Paradise Lost". Notes and Queries 48 (1). Oxford University Press. Tarrant, Richard (2007). "Ancient receptions of Horace". The Cambridge Companion to Horace. Cambridge University Press. Tollet, Elizabeth (1755). Poems on Several Occasions. London. Further readingEdit Davis, Gregson (1991). Polyhymnia the Rhetoric of Horatian Lyric Discourse. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 0-520-91030-3. Fraenkel, Eduard (1957). Horace. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Horace (1983). The Complete Works of Horace. Charles E. Passage, trans. New York: Ungar. ISBN 0-8044-2404-7. Johnson, W. R. (1993). Horace and the Dialectic of Freedom: Readings in Epistles 1. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. ISBN 0-8014-2868-8. Lyne, R.O.A.M. (1995). Horace: Behind the Public Poetry. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press. ISBN 0-300-06322-9. Lyons, Stuart (1997). Horace's Odes and the Mystery of Do-Re-Mi. Aris & Phillips. Lyons, Stuart (2010). Music in the Odes of Horace. Aris & Phillips. Michie, James (1964). The Odes of Horace. Rupert Hart-Davis. Newman, J.K. (1967). Augustus and the New Poetry. Brussels: Latomus, revue d’études latines. Noyes, Alfred (1947). Horace: A Portrait. New York: Sheed and Ward. Perret, Jacques (1964). Horace. Bertha Humez, trans. New York: New York University Press. Putnam, Michael C.J. (1986). Artifices of Eternity: Horace's Fourth Book of Odes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. ISBN 0-8014-1852-6. Reckford, Kenneth J. (1969). Horace. New York: Twayne. Rudd, Niall, ed. (1993). Horace 2000: A Celebration – Essays for the Bimillennium. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press. ISBN 0-472-10490-X. Sydenham, Colin (2005). Horace: The Odes. Duckworth. West, David (1997). Horace The Complete Odes and Epodes. Oxford University Press. Wilkinson, L.P. (1951). Horace and His Lyric Poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. External linksEdit Horaceat Wikipedia's sister projects  Definitions from Wiktionary  Media from Wikimedia Commons  Quotations from Wikiquote  Texts from Wikisource  Data from Wikidata Works by Horace at Project Gutenberg Works by or about Horace at Internet Archive Works by Horace at LibriVox (public domain audiobooks)   Q. Horati Flacci opera, recensuerunt O. Keller et A. Holder, 2 voll., Lipsiae in aedibus B. G. Teubneri, 1864–9. Common sayings from Horace The works of Horace at The Latin Library Carmina Horatiana All Carmina of Horace in Latin recited by Thomas Bervoets. Selected Poems of Horace Works by Horace at Perseus Digital Library Biography and chronology Horace's works: text, concordances and frequency list SORGLL: Horace, Odes I.22, read by Robert Sonkowsky Translations of several odes in the original meters (with accompaniment). A discussion and comparison of three different contemporary translations of Horace's Odes Some spurious lines in the Ars Poetica? Horati opera, Acronis et Porphyrionis commentarii, varia lectio etc. (latine) Horace MS 1a Ars Poetica and Epistulae at OPenn Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Horace&oldid=992281367" Last edited on 4 December 2020, at 13:30 Content is available under CC BY-SA 3.0 unless otherwise noted. This page was last edited on 4 December 2020, at 13:30 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Terms of Use Desktop Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-m-wikipedia-org-75 ---- Horace - Wikipedia Open main menu Home Random Nearby Log in Settings Donate About Wikipedia Disclaimers Search Horace Language Watch Edit This article is about the Roman poet. For the Egyptian god, see Horus. For other uses, see Horace (disambiguation). Quintus Horatius Flaccus (8 December 65 – 27 November 8 BC), known in the English-speaking world as Horace (/ˈhɒrɪs/), was the leading Roman lyric poet during the time of Augustus (also known as Octavian). The rhetorician Quintilian regarded his Odes as just about the only Latin lyrics worth reading: "He can be lofty sometimes, yet he is also full of charm and grace, versatile in his figures, and felicitously daring in his choice of words."[nb 1] Horace Horace, as imagined by Anton von Werner Born Quintus Horatius Flaccus 8 December 65 BC Venusia, Italy, Roman Republic Died 27 November 8 BC (age 56) Rome Resting place Rome Occupation Soldier, scriba quaestorius, poet, senator Language Latin Nationality Roman Genre Lyric poetry Notable works Odes "The Art of Poetry" Horace also crafted elegant hexameter verses (Satires and Epistles) and caustic iambic poetry (Epodes). The hexameters are amusing yet serious works, friendly in tone, leading the ancient satirist Persius to comment: "as his friend laughs, Horace slyly puts his finger on his every fault; once let in, he plays about the heartstrings".[nb 2] His career coincided with Rome's momentous change from a republic to an empire. An officer in the republican army defeated at the Battle of Philippi in 42 BC, he was befriended by Octavian's right-hand man in civil affairs, Maecenas, and became a spokesman for the new regime. For some commentators, his association with the regime was a delicate balance in which he maintained a strong measure of independence (he was "a master of the graceful sidestep")[1] but for others he was, in John Dryden's phrase, "a well-mannered court slave".[2][nb 3] Contents 1 Life 1.1 Childhood 1.2 Adulthood 1.2.1 Poet 1.2.2 Knight 2 Works 2.1 Historical context 2.2 Themes 3 Reception 3.1 Antiquity 3.2 Middle Ages and Renaissance 3.3 Age of Enlightenment 3.4 19th century on 4 Translations 5 In popular culture 6 See also 7 Notes 8 Citations 9 References 10 Further reading 11 External links LifeEdit   Horatii Flacci Sermonum (1577) Horace can be regarded as the world's first autobiographer.[3] In his writings, he tells us far more about himself, his character, his development, and his way of life, than any other great poet of antiquity. Some of the biographical material contained in his work can be supplemented from the short but valuable "Life of Horace" by Suetonius (in his Lives of the Poets).[4] ChildhoodEdit He was born on 8 December 65 BC[nb 4] in the Samnite south of Italy.[5] His home town, Venusia, lay on a trade route in the border region between Apulia and Lucania (Basilicata). Various Italic dialects were spoken in the area and this perhaps enriched his feeling for language. He could have been familiar with Greek words even as a young boy and later he poked fun at the jargon of mixed Greek and Oscan spoken in neighbouring Canusium.[6] One of the works he probably studied in school was the Odyssia of Livius Andronicus, taught by teachers like the 'Orbilius' mentioned in one of his poems.[7] Army veterans could have been settled there at the expense of local families uprooted by Rome as punishment for their part in the Social War (91–88 BC).[8] Such state-sponsored migration must have added still more linguistic variety to the area. According to a local tradition reported by Horace,[9] a colony of Romans or Latins had been installed in Venusia after the Samnites had been driven out early in the third century. In that case, young Horace could have felt himself to be a Roman[10][11] though there are also indications that he regarded himself as a Samnite or Sabellus by birth.[12][13] Italians in modern and ancient times have always been devoted to their home towns, even after success in the wider world, and Horace was no different. Images of his childhood setting and references to it are found throughout his poems.[14] Horace's father was probably a Venutian taken captive by Romans in the Social War, or possibly he was descended from a Sabine captured in the Samnite Wars. Either way, he was a slave for at least part of his life. He was evidently a man of strong abilities however and managed to gain his freedom and improve his social position. Thus Horace claimed to be the free-born son of a prosperous 'coactor'.[15] The term 'coactor' could denote various roles, such as tax collector, but its use by Horace[16] was explained by scholia as a reference to 'coactor argentareus' i.e. an auctioneer with some of the functions of a banker, paying the seller out of his own funds and later recovering the sum with interest from the buyer.[17] The father spent a small fortune on his son's education, eventually accompanying him to Rome to oversee his schooling and moral development. The poet later paid tribute to him in a poem[18] that one modern scholar considers the best memorial by any son to his father.[nb 5] The poem includes this passage: If my character is flawed by a few minor faults, but is otherwise decent and moral, if you can point out only a few scattered blemishes on an otherwise immaculate surface, if no one can accuse me of greed, or of prurience, or of profligacy, if I live a virtuous life, free of defilement (pardon, for a moment, my self-praise), and if I am to my friends a good friend, my father deserves all the credit... As it is now, he deserves from me unstinting gratitude and praise. I could never be ashamed of such a father, nor do I feel any need, as many people do, to apologize for being a freedman's son. Satires 1.6.65–92 He never mentioned his mother in his verses and he might not have known much about her. Perhaps she also had been a slave.[15] AdulthoodEdit Horace left Rome, possibly after his father's death, and continued his formal education in Athens, a great centre of learning in the ancient world, where he arrived at nineteen years of age, enrolling in The Academy. Founded by Plato, The Academy was now dominated by Epicureans and Stoics, whose theories and practises made a deep impression on the young man from Venusia.[19] Meanwhile, he mixed and lounged about with the elite of Roman youth, such as Marcus, the idle son of Cicero, and the Pompeius to whom he later addressed a poem.[20] It was in Athens too that he probably acquired deep familiarity with the ancient tradition of Greek lyric poetry, at that time largely the preserve of grammarians and academic specialists (access to such material was easier in Athens than in Rome, where the public libraries had yet to be built by Asinius Pollio and Augustus).[21] Rome's troubles following the assassination of Julius Caesar were soon to catch up with him. Marcus Junius Brutus came to Athens seeking support for the republican cause. Brutus was fêted around town in grand receptions and he made a point of attending academic lectures, all the while recruiting supporters among the young men studying there, including Horace.[22] An educated young Roman could begin military service high in the ranks and Horace was made tribunus militum (one of six senior officers of a typical legion), a post usually reserved for men of senatorial or equestrian rank and which seems to have inspired jealousy among his well-born confederates.[23][24] He learned the basics of military life while on the march, particularly in the wilds of northern Greece, whose rugged scenery became a backdrop to some of his later poems.[25] It was there in 42 BC that Octavian (later Augustus) and his associate Mark Antony crushed the republican forces at the Battle of Philippi. Horace later recorded it as a day of embarrassment for himself, when he fled without his shield,[26] but allowance should be made for his self-deprecating humour. Moreover, the incident allowed him to identify himself with some famous poets who had long ago abandoned their shields in battle, notably his heroes Alcaeus and Archilochus. The comparison with the latter poet is uncanny: Archilochus lost his shield in a part of Thrace near Philippi, and he was deeply involved in the Greek colonization of Thasos, where Horace's die-hard comrades finally surrendered.[24] Octavian offered an early amnesty to his opponents and Horace quickly accepted it. On returning to Italy, he was confronted with yet another loss: his father's estate in Venusia was one of many throughout Italy to be confiscated for the settlement of veterans (Virgil lost his estate in the north about the same time). Horace later claimed that he was reduced to poverty and this led him to try his hand at poetry.[27] In reality, there was no money to be had from versifying. At best, it offered future prospects through contacts with other poets and their patrons among the rich.[28] Meanwhile, he obtained the sinecure of scriba quaestorius, a civil service position at the aerarium or Treasury, profitable enough to be purchased even by members of the ordo equester and not very demanding in its work-load, since tasks could be delegated to scribae or permanent clerks.[29] It was about this time that he began writing his Satires and Epodes. PoetEdit   Horace reads before Maecenas, by Fyodor Bronnikov The Epodes belong to iambic poetry. Iambic poetry features insulting and obscene language;[30][31] sometimes, it is referred to as blame poetry.[32] Blame poetry, or shame poetry, is poetry written to blame and shame fellow citizens into a sense of their social obligations. Horace modelled these poems on the poetry of Archilochus. Social bonds in Rome had been decaying since the destruction of Carthage a little more than a hundred years earlier, due to the vast wealth that could be gained by plunder and corruption.[33] These social ills were magnified by rivalry between Julius Caesar, Mark Antony and confederates like Sextus Pompey, all jockeying for a bigger share of the spoils. One modern scholar has counted a dozen civil wars in the hundred years leading up to 31 BC, including the Spartacus rebellion, eight years before Horace's birth.[34] As the heirs to Hellenistic culture, Horace and his fellow Romans were not well prepared to deal with these problems: At bottom, all the problems that the times were stirring up were of a social nature, which the Hellenistic thinkers were ill qualified to grapple with. Some of them censured oppression of the poor by the rich, but they gave no practical lead, though they may have hoped to see well-meaning rulers doing so. Philosophy was drifting into absorption in self, a quest for private contentedness, to be achieved by self-control and restraint, without much regard for the fate of a disintegrating community. — V. G. Kiernan[35] Horace's Hellenistic background is clear in his Satires, even though the genre was unique to Latin literature. He brought to it a style and outlook suited to the social and ethical issues confronting Rome but he changed its role from public, social engagement to private meditation.[36] Meanwhile, he was beginning to interest Octavian's supporters, a gradual process described by him in one of his satires.[18] The way was opened for him by his friend, the poet Virgil, who had gained admission into the privileged circle around Maecenas, Octavian's lieutenant, following the success of his Eclogues. An introduction soon followed and, after a discreet interval, Horace too was accepted. He depicted the process as an honourable one, based on merit and mutual respect, eventually leading to true friendship, and there is reason to believe that his relationship was genuinely friendly, not just with Maecenas but afterwards with Augustus as well.[37] On the other hand, the poet has been unsympathetically described by one scholar as "a sharp and rising young man, with an eye to the main chance."[38] There were advantages on both sides: Horace gained encouragement and material support, the politicians gained a hold on a potential dissident.[39] His republican sympathies, and his role at Philippi, may have caused him some pangs of remorse over his new status. However most Romans considered the civil wars to be the result of contentio dignitatis, or rivalry between the foremost families of the city, and he too seems to have accepted the principate as Rome's last hope for much needed peace.[40] In 37 BC, Horace accompanied Maecenas on a journey to Brundisium, described in one of his poems[41] as a series of amusing incidents and charming encounters with other friends along the way, such as Virgil. In fact the journey was political in its motivation, with Maecenas en route to negotiatie the Treaty of Tarentum with Antony, a fact Horace artfully keeps from the reader (political issues are largely avoided in the first book of satires).[39] Horace was probably also with Maecenas on one of Octavian's naval expeditions against the piratical Sextus Pompeius, which ended in a disastrous storm off Palinurus in 36 BC, briefly alluded to by Horace in terms of near-drowning.[42][nb 6] There are also some indications in his verses that he was with Maecenas at the Battle of Actium in 31 BC, where Octavian defeated his great rival, Antony.[43][nb 7] By then Horace had already received from Maecenas the famous gift of his Sabine farm, probably not long after the publication of the first book of Satires. The gift, which included income from five tenants, may have ended his career at the Treasury, or at least allowed him to give it less time and energy.[44] It signalled his identification with the Octavian regime yet, in the second book of Satires that soon followed, he continued the apolitical stance of the first book. By this time, he had attained the status of eques Romanus,[45] perhaps as a result of his work at the Treasury.[46] KnightEdit Odes 1–3 were the next focus for his artistic creativity. He adapted their forms and themes from Greek lyric poetry of the seventh and sixth centuries BC. The fragmented nature of the Greek world had enabled his literary heroes to express themselves freely and his semi-retirement from the Treasury in Rome to his own estate in the Sabine hills perhaps empowered him to some extent also[47] yet even when his lyrics touched on public affairs they reinforced the importance of private life.[1] Nevertheless, his work in the period 30–27 BC began to show his closeness to the regime and his sensitivity to its developing ideology. In Odes 1.2, for example, he eulogized Octavian in hyperboles that echo Hellenistic court poetry. The name Augustus, which Octavian assumed in January 27 BC, is first attested in Odes 3.3 and 3.5. In the period 27–24 BC, political allusions in the Odes concentrated on foreign wars in Britain (1.35), Arabia (1.29) Spain (3.8) and Parthia (2.2). He greeted Augustus on his return to Rome in 24 BC as a beloved ruler upon whose good health he depended for his own happiness (3.14).[48] The public reception of Odes 1–3 disappointed him, however. He attributed the lack of success to jealousy among imperial courtiers and to his isolation from literary cliques.[49] Perhaps it was disappointment that led him to put aside the genre in favour of verse letters. He addressed his first book of Epistles to a variety of friends and acquaintances in an urbane style reflecting his new social status as a knight. In the opening poem, he professed a deeper interest in moral philosophy than poetry[50] but, though the collection demonstrates a leaning towards stoic theory, it reveals no sustained thinking about ethics.[51] Maecenas was still the dominant confidante but Horace had now begun to assert his own independence, suavely declining constant invitations to attend his patron.[52] In the final poem of the first book of Epistles, he revealed himself to be forty-four years old in the consulship of Lollius and Lepidus i.e. 21 BC, and "of small stature, fond of the sun, prematurely grey, quick-tempered but easily placated".[53][54] According to Suetonius, the second book of Epistles was prompted by Augustus, who desired a verse epistle to be addressed to himself. Augustus was in fact a prolific letter-writer and he once asked Horace to be his personal secretary. Horace refused the secretarial role but complied with the emperor's request for a verse letter.[55] The letter to Augustus may have been slow in coming, being published possibly as late as 11 BC. It celebrated, among other things, the 15 BC military victories of his stepsons, Drusus and Tiberius, yet it and the following letter[56] were largely devoted to literary theory and criticism. The literary theme was explored still further in Ars Poetica, published separately but written in the form of an epistle and sometimes referred to as Epistles 2.3 (possibly the last poem he ever wrote).[57] He was also commissioned to write odes commemorating the victories of Drusus and Tiberius[58] and one to be sung in a temple of Apollo for the Secular Games, a long-abandoned festival that Augustus revived in accordance with his policy of recreating ancient customs (Carmen Saeculare). Suetonius recorded some gossip about Horace's sexual activities late in life, claiming that the walls of his bedchamber were covered with obscene pictures and mirrors, so that he saw erotica wherever he looked.[nb 8] The poet died at 56 years of age, not long after his friend Maecenas, near whose tomb he was laid to rest. Both men bequeathed their property to Augustus, an honour that the emperor expected of his friends.[59] WorksEdit   Odes 1.14 – Wall poem in Leiden The dating of Horace's works isn't known precisely and scholars often debate the exact order in which they were first 'published'. There are persuasive arguments for the following chronology:[60] Satires 1 (c. 35–34 BC) Satires 2 (c. 30 BC) Epodes (30 BC) Odes 1–3 (c. 23 BC)[nb 9] Epistles 1 (c. 21 BC) Carmen Saeculare (17 BC) Epistles 2 (c. 11 BC)[nb 10] Odes 4 (c. 11 BC) Ars Poetica (c. 10–8 BC)[nb 11] Historical contextEdit Horace composed in traditional metres borrowed from Archaic Greece, employing hexameters in his Satires and Epistles, and iambs in his Epodes, all of which were relatively easy to adapt into Latin forms. His Odes featured more complex measures, including alcaics and sapphics, which were sometimes a difficult fit for Latin structure and syntax. Despite these traditional metres, he presented himself as a partisan in the development of a new and sophisticated style. He was influenced in particular by Hellenistic aesthetics of brevity, elegance and polish, as modelled in the work of Callimachus.[61] As soon as Horace, stirred by his own genius and encouraged by the example of Virgil, Varius, and perhaps some other poets of the same generation, had determined to make his fame as a poet, being by temperament a fighter, he wanted to fight against all kinds of prejudice, amateurish slovenliness, philistinism, reactionary tendencies, in short to fight for the new and noble type of poetry which he and his friends were endeavouring to bring about. — Eduard Fraenkel[62] In modern literary theory, a distinction is often made between immediate personal experience (Urerlebnis) and experience mediated by cultural vectors such as literature, philosophy and the visual arts (Bildungserlebnis).[63] The distinction has little relevance for Horace[citation needed] however since his personal and literary experiences are implicated in each other. Satires 1.5, for example, recounts in detail a real trip Horace made with Virgil and some of his other literary friends, and which parallels a Satire by Lucilius, his predecessor.[64] Unlike much Hellenistic-inspired literature, however, his poetry was not composed for a small coterie of admirers and fellow poets, nor does it rely on abstruse allusions for many of its effects. Though elitist in its literary standards, it was written for a wide audience, as a public form of art.[65] Ambivalence also characterizes his literary persona, since his presentation of himself as part of a small community of philosophically aware people, seeking true peace of mind while shunning vices like greed, was well adapted to Augustus's plans to reform public morality, corrupted by greed—his personal plea for moderation was part of the emperor's grand message to the nation.[66] Horace generally followed the examples of poets established as classics in different genres, such as Archilochus in the Epodes, Lucilius in the Satires and Alcaeus in the Odes, later broadening his scope for the sake of variation and because his models weren't actually suited to the realities confronting him. Archilochus and Alcaeus were aristocratic Greeks whose poetry had a social and religious function that was immediately intelligible to their audiences but which became a mere artifice or literary motif when transposed to Rome. However, the artifice of the Odes is also integral to their success, since they could now accommodate a wide range of emotional effects, and the blend of Greek and Roman elements adds a sense of detachment and universality.[67] Horace proudly claimed to introduce into Latin the spirit and iambic poetry of Archilochus but (unlike Archilochus) without persecuting anyone (Epistles 1.19.23–25). It was no idle boast. His Epodes were modelled on the verses of the Greek poet, as 'blame poetry', yet he avoided targeting real scapegoats. Whereas Archilochus presented himself as a serious and vigorous opponent of wrong-doers, Horace aimed for comic effects and adopted the persona of a weak and ineffectual critic of his times (as symbolized for example in his surrender to the witch Canidia in the final epode).[68] He also claimed to be the first to introduce into Latin the lyrical methods of Alcaeus (Epistles 1.19.32–33) and he actually was the first Latin poet to make consistent use of Alcaic meters and themes: love, politics and the symposium. He imitated other Greek lyric poets as well, employing a 'motto' technique, beginning each ode with some reference to a Greek original and then diverging from it.[69] The satirical poet Lucilius was a senator's son who could castigate his peers with impunity. Horace was a mere freedman's son who had to tread carefully.[70] Lucilius was a rugged patriot and a significant voice in Roman self-awareness, endearing himself to his countrymen by his blunt frankness and explicit politics. His work expressed genuine freedom or libertas. His style included 'metrical vandalism' and looseness of structure. Horace instead adopted an oblique and ironic style of satire, ridiculing stock characters and anonymous targets. His libertas was the private freedom of a philosophical outlook, not a political or social privilege.[71] His Satires are relatively easy-going in their use of meter (relative to the tight lyric meters of the Odes)[72] but formal and highly controlled relative to the poems of Lucilius, whom Horace mocked for his sloppy standards (Satires 1.10.56–61)[nb 12] The Epistles may be considered among Horace's most innovative works. There was nothing like it in Greek or Roman literature. Occasionally poems had had some resemblance to letters, including an elegiac poem from Solon to Mimnermus and some lyrical poems from Pindar to Hieron of Syracuse. Lucilius had composed a satire in the form of a letter, and some epistolary poems were composed by Catullus and Propertius. But nobody before Horace had ever composed an entire collection of verse letters,[73] let alone letters with a focus on philosophical problems. The sophisticated and flexible style that he had developed in his Satires was adapted to the more serious needs of this new genre.[74] Such refinement of style was not unusual for Horace. His craftsmanship as a wordsmith is apparent even in his earliest attempts at this or that kind of poetry, but his handling of each genre tended to improve over time as he adapted it to his own needs.[70] Thus for example it is generally agreed that his second book of Satires, where human folly is revealed through dialogue between characters, is superior to the first, where he propounds his ethics in monologues. Nevertheless, the first book includes some of his most popular poems.[75] ThemesEdit Horace developed a number of inter-related themes throughout his poetic career, including politics, love, philosophy and ethics, his own social role, as well as poetry itself. His Epodes and Satires are forms of 'blame poetry' and both have a natural affinity with the moralising and diatribes of Cynicism. This often takes the form of allusions to the work and philosophy of Bion of Borysthenes [nb 13] but it is as much a literary game as a philosophical alignment. By the time he composed his Epistles, he was a critic of Cynicism along with all impractical and "high-falutin" philosophy in general.[nb 14][76] The Satires also include a strong element of Epicureanism, with frequent allusions to the Epicurean poet Lucretius.[nb 15] So for example the Epicurean sentiment carpe diem is the inspiration behind Horace's repeated punning on his own name (Horatius ~ hora) in Satires 2.6.[77] The Satires also feature some Stoic, Peripatetic and Platonic (Dialogues) elements. In short, the Satires present a medley of philosophical programs, dished up in no particular order—a style of argument typical of the genre.[78] The Odes display a wide range of topics. Over time, he becomes more confident about his political voice.[79] Although he is often thought of as an overly intellectual lover, he is ingenious in representing passion.[80] The "Odes" weave various philosophical strands together, with allusions and statements of doctrine present in about a third of the Odes Books 1–3, ranging from the flippant (1.22, 3.28) to the solemn (2.10, 3.2, 3.3). Epicureanism is the dominant influence, characterizing about twice as many of these odes as Stoicism. A group of odes combines these two influences in tense relationships, such as Odes 1.7, praising Stoic virility and devotion to public duty while also advocating private pleasures among friends. While generally favouring the Epicurean lifestyle, the lyric poet is as eclectic as the satiric poet, and in Odes 2.10 even proposes Aristotle's golden mean as a remedy for Rome's political troubles.[81] Many of Horace's poems also contain much reflection on genre, the lyric tradition, and the function of poetry.[82] Odes 4, thought to be composed at the emperor's request, takes the themes of the first three books of "Odes" to a new level. This book shows greater poetic confidence after the public performance of his "Carmen saeculare" or "Century hymn" at a public festival orchestrated by Augustus. In it, Horace addresses the emperor Augustus directly with more confidence and proclaims his power to grant poetic immortality to those he praises. It is the least philosophical collection of his verses, excepting the twelfth ode, addressed to the dead Virgil as if he were living. In that ode, the epic poet and the lyric poet are aligned with Stoicism and Epicureanism respectively, in a mood of bitter-sweet pathos.[83] The first poem of the Epistles sets the philosophical tone for the rest of the collection: "So now I put aside both verses and all those other games: What is true and what befits is my care, this my question, this my whole concern." His poetic renunciation of poetry in favour of philosophy is intended to be ambiguous. Ambiguity is the hallmark of the Epistles. It is uncertain if those being addressed by the self-mocking poet-philosopher are being honoured or criticized. Though he emerges as an Epicurean, it is on the understanding that philosophical preferences, like political and social choices, are a matter of personal taste. Thus he depicts the ups and downs of the philosophical life more realistically than do most philosophers.[84] ReceptionEdit   Horace, portrayed by Giacomo Di Chirico The reception of Horace's work has varied from one epoch to another and varied markedly even in his own lifetime. Odes 1–3 were not well received when first 'published' in Rome, yet Augustus later commissioned a ceremonial ode for the Centennial Games in 17 BC and also encouraged the publication of Odes 4, after which Horace's reputation as Rome's premier lyricist was assured. His Odes were to become the best received of all his poems in ancient times, acquiring a classic status that discouraged imitation: no other poet produced a comparable body of lyrics in the four centuries that followed[85] (though that might also be attributed to social causes, particularly the parasitism that Italy was sinking into).[86] In the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, ode-writing became highly fashionable in England and a large number of aspiring poets imitated Horace both in English and in Latin.[87] In a verse epistle to Augustus (Epistle 2.1), in 12 BC, Horace argued for classic status to be awarded to contemporary poets, including Virgil and apparently himself.[88] In the final poem of his third book of Odes he claimed to have created for himself a monument more durable than bronze ("Exegi monumentum aere perennius", Carmina 3.30.1). For one modern scholar, however, Horace's personal qualities are more notable than the monumental quality of his achievement: ... when we hear his name we don't really think of a monument. We think rather of a voice which varies in tone and resonance but is always recognizable, and which by its unsentimental humanity evokes a very special blend of liking and respect. — Niall Rudd[89] Yet for men like Wilfred Owen, scarred by experiences of World War I, his poetry stood for discredited values: My friend, you would not tell with such high zest To children ardent for some desperate glory, The Old Lie: Dulce et decorum est Pro patria mori.[nb 16] The same motto, Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori, had been adapted to the ethos of martyrdom in the lyrics of early Christian poets like Prudentius.[90] These preliminary comments touch on a small sample of developments in the reception of Horace's work. More developments are covered epoch by epoch in the following sections. AntiquityEdit Horace's influence can be observed in the work of his near contemporaries, Ovid and Propertius. Ovid followed his example in creating a completely natural style of expression in hexameter verse, and Propertius cheekily mimicked him in his third book of elegies.[nb 17] His Epistles provided them both with a model for their own verse letters and it also shaped Ovid's exile poetry.[nb 18] His influence had a perverse aspect. As mentioned before, the brilliance of his Odes may have discouraged imitation. Conversely, they may have created a vogue for the lyrics of the archaic Greek poet Pindar, due to the fact that Horace had neglected that style of lyric (see Influence and Legacy of Pindar).[91] The iambic genre seems almost to have disappeared after publication of Horace's Epodes. Ovid's Ibis was a rare attempt at the form but it was inspired mainly by Callimachus, and there are some iambic elements in Martial but the main influence there was Catullus.[92] A revival of popular interest in the satires of Lucilius may have been inspired by Horace's criticism of his unpolished style. Both Horace and Lucilius were considered good role-models by Persius, who critiqued his own satires as lacking both the acerbity of Lucillius and the gentler touch of Horace.[nb 19] Juvenal's caustic satire was influenced mainly by Lucilius but Horace by then was a school classic and Juvenal could refer to him respectfully and in a round-about way as "the Venusine lamp".[nb 20] Statius paid homage to Horace by composing one poem in Sapphic and one in Alcaic meter (the verse forms most often associated with Odes), which he included in his collection of occasional poems, Silvae. Ancient scholars wrote commentaries on the lyric meters of the Odes, including the scholarly poet Caesius Bassus. By a process called derivatio, he varied established meters through the addition or omission of syllables, a technique borrowed by Seneca the Younger when adapting Horatian meters to the stage.[93] Horace's poems continued to be school texts into late antiquity. Works attributed to Helenius Acro and Pomponius Porphyrio are the remnants of a much larger body of Horatian scholarship. Porphyrio arranged the poems in non-chronological order, beginning with the Odes, because of their general popularity and their appeal to scholars (the Odes were to retain this privileged position in the medieval manuscript tradition and thus in modern editions also). Horace was often evoked by poets of the fourth century, such as Ausonius and Claudian. Prudentius presented himself as a Christian Horace, adapting Horatian meters to his own poetry and giving Horatian motifs a Christian tone.[nb 21] On the other hand, St Jerome, modelled an uncompromising response to the pagan Horace, observing: "What harmony can there be between Christ and the Devil? What has Horace to do with the Psalter?"[nb 22] By the early sixth century, Horace and Prudentius were both part of a classical heritage that was struggling to survive the disorder of the times. Boethius, the last major author of classical Latin literature, could still take inspiration from Horace, sometimes mediated by Senecan tragedy.[94] It can be argued that Horace's influence extended beyond poetry to dignify core themes and values of the early Christian era, such as self-sufficiency, inner contentment and courage.[nb 23] Middle Ages and RenaissanceEdit   Horace in his Studium: German print of the fifteenth century, summarizing the final ode 4.15 (in praise of Augustus). Classical texts almost ceased being copied in the period between the mid sixth century and the Carolingian revival. Horace's work probably survived in just two or three books imported into northern Europe from Italy. These became the ancestors of six extant manuscripts dated to the ninth century. Two of those six manuscripts are French in origin, one was produced in Alsace, and the other three show Irish influence but were probably written in continental monasteries (Lombardy for example).[95] By the last half of the ninth century, it was not uncommon for literate people to have direct experience of Horace's poetry. His influence on the Carolingian Renaissance can be found in the poems of Heiric of Auxerre[nb 24] and in some manuscripts marked with neumes, mysterious notations that may have been an aid to the memorization and discussion of his lyric meters. Ode 4.11 is neumed with the melody of a hymn to John the Baptist, Ut queant laxis, composed in Sapphic stanzas. This hymn later became the basis of the solfege system (Do, re, mi...)—an association with western music quite appropriate for a lyric poet like Horace, though the language of the hymn is mainly Prudentian.[96] Lyons[97] argues that the melody in question was linked with Horace's Ode well before Guido d'Arezzo fitted Ut queant laxis to it. However, the melody is unlikely to be a survivor from classical times, although Ovid[98] testifies to Horace's use of the lyre while performing his Odes. The German scholar, Ludwig Traube, once dubbed the tenth and eleventh centuries The age of Horace (aetas Horatiana), and placed it between the aetas Vergiliana of the eighth and ninth centuries, and the aetas Ovidiana of the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, a distinction supposed to reflect the dominant classical Latin influences of those times. Such a distinction is over-schematized since Horace was a substantial influence in the ninth century as well. Traube had focused too much on Horace's Satires.[99] Almost all of Horace's work found favour in the Medieval period. In fact medieval scholars were also guilty of over-schematism, associating Horace's different genres with the different ages of man. A twelfth-century scholar encapsulated the theory: "...Horace wrote four different kinds of poems on account of the four ages, the Odes for boys, the Ars Poetica for young men, the Satires for mature men, the Epistles for old and complete men."[100] It was even thought that Horace had composed his works in the order in which they had been placed by ancient scholars.[nb 25] Despite its naivety, the schematism involved an appreciation of Horace's works as a collection, the Ars Poetica, Satires and Epistles appearing to find favour as well as the Odes. The later Middle Ages however gave special significance to Satires and Epistles, being considered Horace's mature works. Dante referred to Horace as Orazio satiro, and he awarded him a privileged position in the first circle of Hell, with Homer, Ovid and Lucan.[101] Horace's popularity is revealed in the large number of quotes from all his works found in almost every genre of medieval literature, and also in the number of poets imitating him in quantitative Latin meter. The most prolific imitator of his Odes was the Bavarian monk, Metellus of Tegernsee, who dedicated his work to the patron saint of Tegernsee Abbey, St Quirinus, around the year 1170. He imitated all Horace's lyrical meters then followed these up with imitations of other meters used by Prudentius and Boethius, indicating that variety, as first modelled by Horace, was considered a fundamental aspect of the lyric genre. The content of his poems however was restricted to simple piety.[102] Among the most successful imitators of Satires and Epistles was another Germanic author, calling himself Sextus Amarcius, around 1100, who composed four books, the first two exemplifying vices, the second pair mainly virtues.[103] Petrarch is a key figure in the imitation of Horace in accentual meters. His verse letters in Latin were modelled on the Epistles and he wrote a letter to Horace in the form of an ode. However he also borrowed from Horace when composing his Italian sonnets. One modern scholar has speculated that authors who imitated Horace in accentual rhythms (including stressed Latin and vernacular languages) may have considered their work a natural sequel to Horace's metrical variety.[104] In France, Horace and Pindar were the poetic models for a group of vernacular authors called the Pléiade, including for example Pierre de Ronsard and Joachim du Bellay. Montaigne made constant and inventive use of Horatian quotes.[105] The vernacular languages were dominant in Spain and Portugal in the sixteenth century, where Horace's influence is notable in the works of such authors as Garcilaso de la Vega, Juan Boscán, Sá de Miranda, Antonio Ferreira and Fray Luis de León, the last writing odes on the Horatian theme beatus ille (happy the man).[106] The sixteenth century in western Europe was also an age of translations (except in Germany, where Horace wasn't translated into the vernacular until well into the seventeenth century). The first English translator was Thomas Drant, who placed translations of Jeremiah and Horace side by side in Medicinable Morall, 1566. That was also the year that the Scot George Buchanan paraphrased the Psalms in a Horatian setting. Ben Jonson put Horace on the stage in 1601 in Poetaster, along with other classical Latin authors, giving them all their own verses to speak in translation. Horace's part evinces the independent spirit, moral earnestness and critical insight that many readers look for in his poems.[107] Age of EnlightenmentEdit During the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, or the Age of Enlightenment, neoclassical culture was pervasive. English literature in the middle of that period has been dubbed Augustan. It is not always easy to distinguish Horace's influence during those centuries (the mixing of influences is shown for example in one poet's pseudonym, Horace Juvenal).[nb 26] However a measure of his influence can be found in the diversity of the people interested in his works, both among readers and authors.[108] New editions of his works were published almost yearly. There were three new editions in 1612 (two in Leiden, one in Frankfurt) and again in 1699 (Utrecht, Barcelona, Cambridge). Cheap editions were plentiful and fine editions were also produced, including one whose entire text was engraved by John Pine in copperplate. The poet James Thomson owned five editions of Horace's work and the physician James Douglas had five hundred books with Horace-related titles. Horace was often commended in periodicals such as The Spectator, as a hallmark of good judgement, moderation and manliness, a focus for moralising.[nb 27] His verses offered a fund of mottoes, such as simplex munditiis (elegance in simplicity), splendide mendax (nobly untruthful), sapere aude (dare to know), nunc est bibendum (now is the time to drink), carpe diem (seize the day, perhaps the only one still in common use today).[94] These were quoted even in works as prosaic as Edmund Quincy's A treatise of hemp-husbandry (1765). The fictional hero Tom Jones recited his verses with feeling.[109] His works were also used to justify commonplace themes, such as patriotic obedience, as in James Parry's English lines from an Oxford University collection in 1736:[110] What friendly Muse will teach my Lays To emulate the Roman fire? Justly to sound a Caeser's praise Demands a bold Horatian lyre. Horatian-style lyrics were increasingly typical of Oxford and Cambridge verse collections for this period, most of them in Latin but some like the previous ode in English. John Milton's Lycidas first appeared in such a collection. It has few Horatian echoes[nb 28] yet Milton's associations with Horace were lifelong. He composed a controversial version of Odes 1.5, and Paradise Lost includes references to Horace's 'Roman' Odes 3.1–6 (Book 7 for example begins with echoes of Odes 3.4).[111] Yet Horace's lyrics could offer inspiration to libertines as well as moralists, and neo-Latin sometimes served as a kind of discrete veil for the risqué. Thus for example Benjamin Loveling authored a catalogue of Drury Lane and Covent Garden prostitutes, in Sapphic stanzas, and an encomium for a dying lady "of salacious memory".[112] Some Latin imitations of Horace were politically subversive, such as a marriage ode by Anthony Alsop that included a rallying cry for the Jacobite cause. On the other hand, Andrew Marvell took inspiration from Horace's Odes 1.37 to compose his English masterpiece Horatian Ode upon Cromwell's Return from Ireland, in which subtly nuanced reflections on the execution of Charles I echo Horace's ambiguous response to the death of Cleopatra (Marvell's ode was suppressed in spite of its subtlety and only began to be widely published in 1776). Samuel Johnson took particular pleasure in reading The Odes.[nb 29] Alexander Pope wrote direct Imitations of Horace (published with the original Latin alongside) and also echoed him in Essays and The Rape of the Lock. He even emerged as "a quite Horatian Homer" in his translation of the Iliad.[113] Horace appealed also to female poets, such as Anna Seward (Original sonnets on various subjects, and odes paraphrased from Horace, 1799) and Elizabeth Tollet, who composed a Latin ode in Sapphic meter to celebrate her brother's return from overseas, with tea and coffee substituted for the wine of Horace's sympotic settings: Quos procax nobis numeros, jocosque Musa dictaret? mihi dum tibique Temperent baccis Arabes, vel herbis Pocula Seres[114] What verses and jokes might the bold Muse dictate? while for you and me Arabs flavour our cups with beans Or Chinese with leaves.[115] Horace's Ars Poetica is second only to Aristotle's Poetics in its influence on literary theory and criticism. Milton recommended both works in his treatise of Education.[116] Horace's Satires and Epistles however also had a huge impact, influencing theorists and critics such as John Dryden.[117] There was considerable debate over the value of different lyrical forms for contemporary poets, as represented on one hand by the kind of four-line stanzas made familiar by Horace's Sapphic and Alcaic Odes and, on the other, the loosely structured Pindarics associated with the odes of Pindar. Translations occasionally involved scholars in the dilemmas of censorship. Thus Christopher Smart entirely omitted Odes 4.10 and re-numbered the remaining odes. He also removed the ending of Odes 4.1. Thomas Creech printed Epodes 8 and 12 in the original Latin but left out their English translations. Philip Francis left out both the English and Latin for those same two epodes, a gap in the numbering the only indication that something was amiss. French editions of Horace were influential in England and these too were regularly bowdlerized. Most European nations had their own 'Horaces': thus for example Friedrich von Hagedorn was called The German Horace and Maciej Kazimierz Sarbiewski The Polish Horace (the latter was much imitated by English poets such as Henry Vaughan and Abraham Cowley). Pope Urban VIII wrote voluminously in Horatian meters, including an ode on gout.[118] 19th century onEdit Horace maintained a central role in the education of English-speaking elites right up until the 1960s.[119] A pedantic emphasis on the formal aspects of language-learning at the expense of literary appreciation may have made him unpopular in some quarters[120] yet it also confirmed his influence—a tension in his reception that underlies Byron's famous lines from Childe Harold (Canto iv, 77):[121] Then farewell, Horace, whom I hated so Not for thy faults, but mine; it is a curse To understand, not feel thy lyric flow, To comprehend, but never love thy verse. William Wordsworth's mature poetry, including the preface to Lyrical Ballads, reveals Horace's influence in its rejection of false ornament[122] and he once expressed "a wish / to meet the shade of Horace...".[nb 30] John Keats echoed the opening of Horace's Epodes 14 in the opening lines of Ode to a Nightingale.[nb 31] The Roman poet was presented in the nineteenth century as an honorary English gentleman. William Thackeray produced a version of Odes 1.38 in which Horace's 'boy' became 'Lucy', and Gerard Manley Hopkins translated the boy innocently as 'child'. Horace was translated by Sir Theodore Martin (biographer of Prince Albert) but minus some ungentlemanly verses, such as the erotic Odes 1.25 and Epodes 8 and 12. Edward Bulwer-Lytton produced a popular translation and William Gladstone also wrote translations during his last days as Prime Minister.[123] Edward FitzGerald's Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam, though formally derived from the Persian ruba'i, nevertheless shows a strong Horatian influence, since, as one modern scholar has observed, "...the quatrains inevitably recall the stanzas of the 'Odes', as does the narrating first person of the world-weary, ageing Epicurean Omar himself, mixing sympotic exhortation and 'carpe diem' with splendid moralising and 'memento mori' nihilism."[nb 32] Matthew Arnold advised a friend in verse not to worry about politics, an echo of Odes 2.11, yet later became a critic of Horace's inadequacies relative to Greek poets, as role models of Victorian virtues, observing: "If human life were complete without faith, without enthusiasm, without energy, Horace...would be the perfect interpreter of human life."[124] Christina Rossetti composed a sonnet depicting a woman willing her own death steadily, drawing on Horace's depiction of 'Glycera' in Odes 1.19.5–6 and Cleopatra in Odes 1.37.[nb 33] A. E. Housman considered Odes 4.7, in Archilochian couplets, the most beautiful poem of antiquity[125] and yet he generally shared Horace's penchant for quatrains, being readily adapted to his own elegiac and melancholy strain.[126] The most famous poem of Ernest Dowson took its title and its heroine's name from a line of Odes 4.1, Non sum qualis eram bonae sub regno Cynarae, as well as its motif of nostalgia for a former flame. Kipling wrote a famous parody of the Odes, satirising their stylistic idiosyncrasies and especially the extraordinary syntax, but he also used Horace's Roman patriotism as a focus for British imperialism, as in the story Regulus in the school collection Stalky & Co., which he based on Odes 3.5.[127] Wilfred Owen's famous poem, quoted above, incorporated Horatian text to question patriotism while ignoring the rules of Latin scansion. However, there were few other echoes of Horace in the war period, possibly because war is not actually a major theme of Horace's work.[128]   Bibendum (the symbol of the Michelin tyre company) takes his name from the opening line of Ode 1.37, Nunc est bibendum. Both W.H.Auden and Louis MacNeice began their careers as teachers of classics and both responded as poets to Horace's influence. Auden for example evoked the fragile world of the 1930s in terms echoing Odes 2.11.1–4, where Horace advises a friend not to let worries about frontier wars interfere with current pleasures. And, gentle, do not care to know Where Poland draws her Eastern bow,      What violence is done; Nor ask what doubtful act allows Our freedom in this English house,      Our picnics in the sun.[nb 34] The American poet, Robert Frost, echoed Horace's Satires in the conversational and sententious idiom of some of his longer poems, such as The Lesson for Today (1941), and also in his gentle advocacy of life on the farm, as in Hyla Brook (1916), evoking Horace's fons Bandusiae in Ode 3.13. Now at the start of the third millennium, poets are still absorbing and re-configuring the Horatian influence, sometimes in translation (such as a 2002 English/American edition of the Odes by thirty-six poets)[nb 35] and sometimes as inspiration for their own work (such as a 2003 collection of odes by a New Zealand poet).[nb 36] Horace's Epodes have largely been ignored in the modern era, excepting those with political associations of historical significance. The obscene qualities of some of the poems have repulsed even scholars[nb 37] yet more recently a better understanding of the nature of Iambic poetry has led to a re-evaluation of the whole collection.[129][130] A re-appraisal of the Epodes also appears in creative adaptations by recent poets (such as a 2004 collection of poems that relocates the ancient context to a 1950s industrial town).[nb 38] TranslationsEdit John Dryden successfully adapted three of the Odes (and one Epode) into verse for readers of his own age. Samuel Johnson favored the versions of Philip Francis. Others favor unrhymed translations. In 1964 James Michie published a translation of the Odes—many of them fully rhymed—including a dozen of the poems in the original Sapphic and Alcaic metres. More recent verse translations of the Odes include those by David West (free verse), and Colin Sydenham (rhymed). Ars Poetica was first translated into English by Ben Jonson and later by Lord Byron. Horace's Odes and the Mystery of Do-Re-Mi Stuart Lyons (rhymed) Aris & Phillips ISBN 978-0-85668-790-7 In popular cultureEdit The Oxford Latin Course textbooks use the life of Horace to illustrate an average Roman's life in the late Republic to Early Empire.[131] See alsoEdit  Literature portal  Ancient Rome portal  Biography portal Carpe diem Horatia (gens) List of ancient Romans Otium Prosody (Latin) Translation NotesEdit ^ Quintilian 10.1.96. The only other lyrical poet Quintilian thought comparable with Horace was the now obscure poet/metrical theorist, Caesius Bassus (R. Tarrant, Ancient Receptions of Horace, 280) ^ Translated from Persius' own 'Satires' 1.116–17: "omne vafer vitium ridenti Flaccus amico / tangit et admissus circum praecordia ludit." ^ Quoted by N. Rudd from John Dryden's Discourse Concerning the Original and Progress of Satire, excerpted from W.P.Ker's edition of Dryden's essays, Oxford 1926, vol. 2, pp. 86–87 ^ The year is given in Odes 3.21.1 ("Consule Manlio"), the month in Epistles 1.20.27, the day in Suetonius' biography Vita (R. Nisbet, Horace: life and chronology, 7) ^ "No son ever set a finer monument to his father than Horace did in the sixth satire of Book I...Horace's description of his father is warm-hearted but free from sentimentality or exaggeration. We see before us one of the common people, a hard-working, open-minded, and thoroughly honest man of simple habits and strict convictions, representing some of the best qualities that at the end of the Republic could still be found in the unsophisticated society of the Italian municipia" — E. Fraenkel, Horace, 5–6 ^ Odes 3.4.28: "nec (me extinxit) Sicula Palinurus unda"; "nor did Palinurus extinguish me with Sicilian waters". Maecenas' involvement is recorded by Appian Bell. Civ. 5.99 but Horace's ode is the only historical reference to his own presence there, depending however on interpretation. (R. Nisbet, Horace: life and chronology, 10) ^ The point is much disputed among scholars and hinges on how the text is interpreted. Epodes 9 for example may offer proof of Horace's presence if 'ad hunc frementis' ('gnashing at this' man i.e. the traitrous Roman ) is a misreading of 'at huc...verterent' (but hither...they fled) in lines describing the defection of the Galatian cavalry, "ad hunc frementis verterunt bis mille equos / Galli canentes Caesarem" (R. Nisbet, Horace: life and chronology, 12). ^ Suetonius signals that the report is based on rumours by employing the terms "traditur...dicitur" / "it is reported...it is said" (E. Fraenkel, Horace, 21) ^ According to a recent theory, the three books of Odes were issued separately, possibly in 26, 24 and 23 BC (see G. Hutchinson (2002), Classical Quarterly 52: 517–37) ^ 19 BC is the usual estimate but c. 11 BC has good support too (see R. Nisbet, Horace: life and chronology, 18–20 ^ The date however is subject to much controversy with 22–18 BC another option (see for example R. Syme, The Augustan Aristocracy, 379–81 ^ "[Lucilius]...resembles a man whose only concern is to force / something into the framework of six feet, and who gaily produces / two hundred lines before dinner and another two hundred after." – Satire 1.10.59–61 (translated by Niall Rudd, The Satires of Horace and Persius, Penguin Classics 1973, p. 69) ^ There is one reference to Bion by name in Epistles 2.2.60, and the clearest allusion to him is in Satire 1.6, which parallels Bion fragments 1, 2, 16 Kindstrand ^ Epistles 1.17 and 1.18.6–8 are critical of the extreme views of Diogenes and also of social adaptations of Cynic precepts, and yet Epistle 1.2 could be either Cynic or Stoic in its orientation (J. Moles, Philosophy and ethics, p. 177 ^ Satires 1.1.25–26, 74–75, 1.2.111–12, 1.3.76–77, 97–114, 1.5.44, 101–03, 1.6.128–31, 2.2.14–20, 25, 2.6.93–97 ^ Wilfred Owen, Dulce et decorum est (1917), echoes a line from Carmina 3.2.13, "it is sweet and honourable to die for one's country", cited by Stephen Harrison, The nineteenth and twentieth centuries, 340. ^ Propertius published his third book of elegies within a year or two of Horace's Odes 1–3 and mimicked him, for example, in the opening lines, characterizing himself in terms borrowed from Odes 3.1.13 and 3.30.13–14, as a priest of the Muses and as an adaptor of Greek forms of poetry (R. Tarrant, Ancient receptions of Horace, 227) ^ Ovid for example probably borrowed from Horace's Epistle 1.20 the image of a poetry book as a slave boy eager to leave home, adapting it to the opening poems of Tristia 1 and 3 (R. Tarrant, Ancient receptions of Horace), and Tristia 2 may be understood as a counterpart to Horace's Epistles 2.1, both being letters addressed to Augustus on literary themes (A. Barchiesi, Speaking Volumes, 79–103) ^ The comment is in Persius 1.114–18, yet that same satire has been found to have nearly 80 reminiscences of Horace; see D. Hooley, The Knotted Thong, 29 ^ The allusion to Venusine comes via Horace's Sermones 2.1.35, while lamp signifies the lucubrations of a conscientious poet. According to Quintilian (93), however, many people in Flavian Rome preferred Lucilius not only to Horace but to all other Latin poets (R. Tarrant, Ancient receptions of Horace, 279) ^ Prudentius sometimes alludesto the Odes in a negative context, as expressions of a secular life he is abandoning. Thus for example male pertinax, employed in Prudentius's Praefatio to describe a willful desire for victory, is lifted from Odes 1.9.24, where it describes a girl's half-hearted resistance to seduction. Elsewhere he borrows dux bone from Odes 4.5.5 and 37, where it refers to Augustus, and applies it to Christ (R. Tarrant, Ancient receptions of Horace, 282 ^ St Jerome, Epistles 22.29, incorporating a quote from 2 'Corinthians 6.14: qui consensus Christo et Belial? quid facit cum psalterio Horatius?(cited by K. Friis-Jensen, Horace in the Middle Ages, 292) ^ Odes 3.3.1–8 was especially influential in promoting the value of heroic calm in the face of danger, describing a man who could bear even the collapse of the world without fear (si fractus illabatur orbis,/impavidum ferient ruinae). Echoes are found in Seneca's Agamemnon 593–603, Prudentius's Peristephanon 4.5–12 and Boethius's Consolatio 1 metrum 4.(R. Tarrant, Ancient receptions of Horace, 283–85) ^ Heiric, like Prudentius, gave Horatian motifs a Christian context. Thus the character Lydia in Odes 3.19.15, who would willingly die for her lover twice, becomes in Heiric's Life of St Germaine of Auxerre a saint ready to die twice for the Lord's commandments (R. Tarrant, Ancient receptions of Horace, 287–88) ^ According to a medieval French commentary on the Satires: "...first he composed his lyrics, and in them, speaking to the young, as it were, he took as subject-matter love affairs and quarrels, banquets and drinking parties. Next he wrote his Epodes, and in them composed invectives against men of a more advanced and more dishonourable age...He next wrote his book about the Ars Poetica, and in that instructed men of his own profession to write well...Later he added his book of Satires, in which he reproved those who had fallen a prey to various kinds of vices. Finally, he finished his oeuvre with the Epistles, and in them, following the method of a good farmer, he sowed the virtues where he had rooted out the vices." (cited by K. Friis-Jensen, Horace in the Middle Ages, 294–302) ^ 'Horace Juvenal' was author of Modern manners: a poem, 1793 ^ see for example Spectator 312, 27 Feb. 1712; 548, 28 Nov. 1712; 618, 10 Nov. 1714 ^ One echo of Horace may be found in line 69: "Were it not better done as others use,/ To sport with Amaryllis in the shade/Or with the tangles of Neaera's hair?", which points to the Neara in Odes 3.14.21 (Douglas Bush, Milton: Poetical Works, 144, note 69) ^ Cfr. James Boswell, "The Life of Samuel Johnson" Aetat. 20, 1729 where Boswell remarked of Johnson that Horace's Odes "were the compositions in which he took most delight." ^ The quote, from Memorials of a Tour of Italy (1837), contains allusions to Odes 3.4 and 3.13 (S. Harrison, The nineteenth and twentieth centuries, 334–35) ^ "My heart aches, and a drowsy numbness pains / my sense..." echoes Epodes 14.1–4 (S. Harrison, The nineteenth and twentieth centuries, 335) ^ Comment by S. Harrison, editor and contributor to The Cambridge Companion to Horace (S. Harrison, The nineteenth and twentieth centuries, 337 ^ Rossetti's sonnet, A Study (a soul), dated 1854, was not published in her own lifetime. Some lines: She stands as pale as Parian marble stands / Like Cleopatra when she turns at bay... (C. Rossetti, Complete Poems, 758 ^ Quoted from Auden's poem Out on the lawn I lie in bed, 1933, and cited by S. Harrison, The nineteenth and twentieth centuries, 340 ^ Edited by McClatchy, reviewed by S. Harrison, Bryn Mawr Classical Review 2003.03.05 ^ I. Wedde, The Commonplace Odes, Auckland 2003, (cited by S. Harrison, The nineteenth and twentieth centuries, 345) ^ 'Political' Epodes are 1, 7, 9, 16; notably obscene Epodes are 8 and 12. E. Fraenkel is among the admirers repulsed by these two poems, for another view of which see for example Dee Lesser Clayman, 'Horace's Epodes VIII and XII: More than Clever Obscenity?', The Classical World Vol. 6, No. 1 (September 1975), pp 55–61 JSTOR 4348329 ^ M. Almond, The Works 2004, Washington, cited by S. Harrison, The nineteenth and twentieth centuries, 346 CitationsEdit ^ a b J. Michie, The Odes of Horace, 14 ^ N. Rudd, The Satires of Horace and Persius, 10 ^ R. Barrow R., The Romans Pelican Books, 119 ^ Fraenkel, Eduard. Horace. Oxford: 1957, p. 1. For the Life of Horace by Suetonius, see: (Vita Horati) ^ Brill's Companion to Horace, edited by Hans-Christian Günther, Brill, 2012, p. 7, Google Book ^ Satires 1.10.30 ^ Epistles 2.1.69 ff. ^ E. Fraenkel, Horace, 2–3 ^ Satires 2.1.34 ^ T. Frank, Catullus and Horace, 133–34 ^ A. Campbell, Horace: A New Interpretation, 84 ^ Epistles 1.16.49 ^ R. Nisbet, Horace: life and chronology, 7 ^ E. Fraenkel, Horace, 3–4 ^ a b V. Kiernan, Horace: Poetics and Politics, 24 ^ Satires 1.6.86 ^ E. Fraenkel, Horace, 4–5 ^ a b Satires 1.6 ^ V. Kiernan, Horace: Poetics and Politics, 25 ^ Odes 2.7 ^ E. Fraenkel, Horace, 8–9 ^ E. Fraenkel, Horace, 9–10 ^ Satires 1.6.48 ^ a b R. Nisbet, Horace: life and chronology, 8 ^ V. Kiernan, Horace, 25 ^ Odes 2.7.10 ^ Epistles 2.2.51–52 ^ V. Kiernan, Horace: Poetics and politics ^ E. Fraenkel, Horace, 14–15 ^ Christopher Brown, in A Companion to the Greek Lyric Poets, D.E. Gerber (ed), Leiden 1997, pages 13–88 ^ Douglas E. Gerber, Greek Iambic Poetry, Loeb Classical Library (1999), Introduction pages i–iv ^ D. Mankin, Horace: Epodes, C.U.P., 8 ^ D. Mankin, Horace: Epodes, 6 ^ R. Conway, New Studies of a Great Inheritance, 49–50 ^ V. Kiernan, Horace: Poetics and Politics, 18–19 ^ F. Muecke, The Satires, 109–10 ^ R. Lyne, Augustan Poetry and Society, 599 ^ J. Griffin, Horace in the Thirties, 6 ^ a b R. Nisbet, Horace: life and chronology, 10 ^ D. Mankin, Horace: Epodes, 5 ^ Satires 1.5 ^ Odes 3.4.28 ^ Epodes 1 and 9 ^ E. Fraenkel, Horace, 15 ^ Satires 2.7.53 ^ R. Nisbet, Horace: life and chronology, 11 ^ V. Kiernan, Horace: Poetics and Politics, 61–62 ^ R. Nisbet, Horace: life and chronology, 13 ^ Epistles 1.19.35–44 ^ Epistles 1.1.10 ^ V. Kiernan, Horace: Poetics and Politics, 149, 153 ^ Epistles 1.7 ^ Epistles 1.20.24–25 ^ R. Nisbet, Horace: life and chronology, 14–15 ^ E. Fraenkel, Horace, 17–18 ^ Epistles 2.2 ^ R. Ferri, The Epistles, 121 ^ Odes 4.4 and 4.14 ^ E. Fraenkel, Horace, 23 ^ R Nisbet, Horace: life and chronology, 17–21 ^ S. Harrison, Style and poetic texture, 262 ^ E. Fraenkel, Horace, 124–25 ^ Gundolf, Friedrich (1916). Goethe. Berlin, Germany: Bondi. ^ E. Fraenkel, Horace, 106–07 ^ E. Fraenkel, Horace, 74 ^ E. Fraenkel, Horace, 95–96 ^ J. Griffin, Gods and Religion, 182 ^ S. Harrison, Lyric and Iambic, 192 ^ S. Harrison, Lyric and Iambic, 194–96 ^ a b E. Fraenkel, Horace, 32, 80 ^ L. Morgan, Satire, 177–78 ^ S. Harrison, Style and poetic texture, 271 ^ R. Ferri, The Epistles, pp. 121–22 ^ E. Fraenkel, Horace, p. 309 ^ V. Kiernan, Horace: Poetics and Politics, 28 ^ J. Moles, Philosophy and ethics, pp. 165–69, 177 ^ K. J. Reckford, Some studies in Horace's odes on love ^ J. Moles, Philosophy and ethics, p. 168 ^ Santirocco "Unity and Design", Lowrie "Horace's Narrative Odes" ^ Ancona, "Time and the Erotic" ^ J. Moles, Philosophy and ethics, pp. 171–73 ^ Davis "Polyhymnia" and Lowrie "Horace's Narrative Odes" ^ J. Moles, Philosophy and ethics, p. 179 ^ J. Moles, Philosophy and ethics, pp. 174–80 ^ R. Tarrant, Ancient receptions of Horace, 279 ^ V. Kiernan, Horace: Poetics and Politics, 176 ^ D. Money, The seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, 326, 332 ^ R. Lyme, Augustan Poetry and Society, 603 ^ Niall Rudd, The Satires of Horace and Persius, 14 ^ R. Tarrant, Ancient receptions of Horace, 282–83 ^ R. Tarrant, Ancient receptions of Horace, 280 ^ R. Tarrant, Ancient receptions of Horace, 278 ^ R. Tarrant, Ancient receptions of Horace, 280–81 ^ a b R. Tarrant, Ancient receptions of Horace, 283 ^ R. Tarrant, Ancient receptions of Horace, 285–87 ^ R. Tarrant, Ancient receptions of Horace, 288–89 ^ Stuart Lyons, Horace's Odes and the Mystery of Do-Re-Mi ^ Tristia, 4.10.49–50 ^ B. Bischoff, Living with the satirists, 83–95 ^ K. Friis-Jensen,Horace in the Middle Ages, 291 ^ K. Friis-Jensen, Horace in the Middle Ages, 293, 304 ^ K. Friis-Jensen, Horace in the Middle Ages, 296–98 ^ K. Friis-Jensen, Horace in the Middle Ages, 302 ^ K. Friis-Jensen, Horace in the Middle Ages, 299 ^ Michael McGann, Horace in the Renaissance, 306 ^ E. Rivers, Fray Luis de León: The Original Poems ^ M. McGann, Horace in the Renaissance, 306–07, 313–16 ^ D. Money, The seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, 318, 331, 332 ^ D. Money, The seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, 322 ^ D. Money, The seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, 326–27 ^ J. Talbot, A Horatian Pun in Paradise Lost, 21–3 ^ B. Loveling, Latin and English Poems, 49–52, 79–83 ^ D. Money, The seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, 329–31 ^ E. Tollet, Poems on Several Occasions, 84 ^ Translation adapted from D. Money, The seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, 329 ^ A. Gilbert, Literary Criticism: Plato to Dryden, 124, 669 ^ W. Kupersmith, Roman Satirists in Seventeenth Century England, 97–101 ^ D. Money, The seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, 319–25 ^ S. Harrison, The nineteenth and twentieth centuries, 340 ^ V. Kiernan, Horace: Poetics and Politics, x ^ S. Harrison, The nineteenth and twentieth centuries, 334 ^ D. Money, The seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, 323 ^ S. Harrison, The nineteenth and twentieth centuries, 335–37 ^ M. Arnold, Selected Prose, 74 ^ W. Flesch, Companion to British Poetry, 19th Century, 98 ^ S. Harrison, The nineteenth and twentieth centuries, 339 ^ S. Medcalfe, Kipling's Horace, 217–39 ^ S. Harrison, the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, 340 ^ D. Mankin, Horace: Epodes, 6–9 ^ R. McNeill, Horace, 12 ^ Balme, Maurice, Moorwood, James (1996). Oxford Latin Course Part one. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0195212037. ReferencesEdit Arnold, Matthew (1970). Selected Prose. Penguin Books. ISBN 978-0-14-043058-5. Barrow, R (1949). The Romans. Penguin/Pelican Books. Barchiesi, A (2001). Speaking Volumes: Narrative and Intertext in Ovid and Other Latin Poets. Duckworth. Bischoff, B (1971). "Living with the satirists". Classical Influences on European Culture AD 500–1500. Cambridge University Press. Bush, Douglas (1966). Milton: Poetical Works. Oxford University Press. Campbell, A (1924). Horace: A New Interpretation. London. Conway, R (1921). New Studies of a Great Inheritance. London. Davis, Gregson (1991). Polyhymnia. The Rhetoric to Horatian Lyric Discourse. University of California. Ferri, Rolando (2007). "The Epistles". The Cambridge Companion to Horace. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-53684-4. Flesch, William (2009). The Facts on File Companion to British Poetry, 19th Century. Infobase Publishing. ISBN 978-0-8160-5896-9. Frank, Tenney (1928). Catullus and Horace. New York. Fraenkel, Eduard (1957). Horace. Oxford University Press. Friis-Jensen, Karsten (2007). "Horace in the Middle Ages". The Cambridge Companion to Horace. Cambridge University Press. Griffin, Jasper (1993). "Horace in the Thirties". Horace 2000. Ann Arbor. Griffin, Jasper (2007). "Gods and religion". The Cambridge Companion to Horace. Cambridge university Press. Harrison, Stephen (2005). "Lyric and Iambic". A Companion to Latin Literature. Blackwell Publishing. Harrison, Stephen (2007). "Introduction". The Cambridge Companion to Horace. Cambridge University Press. Harrison, Stephen (2007). "Style and poetic texture". The Cambridge Companion to Horace. Cambridge University Press. Harrison, Stephen (2007). "The nineteenth and twentieth centuries". The Cambridge Companion to Horace. Cambridge University Press. Hooley, D (1997). The Knotted Thong: Structures of Mimesis in Persius. Ann Arbor. Hutchinson, G (2002). "The publication and individuality of Horace's Odes 1–3". Classical Quarterly 52. Kiernan, Victor (1999). Horace: Poetics and Politics. St Martin's Press. Kupersmith, W (1985). Roman Satirists in Seventeenth Century England. Lincoln, Nebraska and London. Loveling, Benjamin (1741). Latin and English Poems, by a Gentleman of Trinity College, Oxford. London. Lowrie, Michèle (1997). Horace's Narrative Odes. Oxford University Press. Lyne, R (1986). "Augustan Poetry and Society". The Oxford History of the Classical World. Oxford University Press. Mankin, David (1995). Horace: Epodes. Cambridge university Press. McNeill, Randall (2010). Horace. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-980511-2. Michie, James (1967). "Horace the Man". The Odes of Horace. Penguin Classics. Moles, John (2007). "Philosophy and ethics". The Cambridge Companion to Horace. Cambridge University Press. Money, David (2007). "The seventeenth and eighteenth centuries". The Cambridge Companion to Horace. Cambridge University Press. Morgan, Llewelyn (2005). "Satire". A Companion to Latin Literature. Blackwell Publishing. Muecke, Frances (2007). "the Satires". The Cambridge Companion to Horace. Cambridge University Press. Nisbet, Robin (2007). "Horace: life and chronology". The Cambridge Companion to Horace. Cambridge University Press. Reckford, K. J. (1997). Horatius: the man and the hour. 118. American Journal of Philology. pp. 538–612. Rivers, Elias (1983). Fray Luis de León: The Original Poems. Grant and Cutler. Rossetti, Christina (2001). The Complete Poems. Penguin Books. Rudd, Niall (1973). The Satires of Horace and Persius. Penguin Classics. Santirocco, Matthew (1986). Unity and Design in Horace's Odes. University of North Carolina. Syme, R (1986). The Augustan Aristocracy. Oxford University Press. Talbot, J (2001). "A Horatian Pun in Paradise Lost". Notes and Queries 48 (1). Oxford University Press. Tarrant, Richard (2007). "Ancient receptions of Horace". The Cambridge Companion to Horace. Cambridge University Press. Tollet, Elizabeth (1755). Poems on Several Occasions. London. Further readingEdit Davis, Gregson (1991). Polyhymnia the Rhetoric of Horatian Lyric Discourse. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 0-520-91030-3. Fraenkel, Eduard (1957). Horace. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Horace (1983). The Complete Works of Horace. Charles E. Passage, trans. New York: Ungar. ISBN 0-8044-2404-7. Johnson, W. R. (1993). Horace and the Dialectic of Freedom: Readings in Epistles 1. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. ISBN 0-8014-2868-8. Lyne, R.O.A.M. (1995). Horace: Behind the Public Poetry. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press. ISBN 0-300-06322-9. Lyons, Stuart (1997). Horace's Odes and the Mystery of Do-Re-Mi. Aris & Phillips. Lyons, Stuart (2010). Music in the Odes of Horace. Aris & Phillips. Michie, James (1964). The Odes of Horace. Rupert Hart-Davis. Newman, J.K. (1967). Augustus and the New Poetry. Brussels: Latomus, revue d’études latines. Noyes, Alfred (1947). Horace: A Portrait. New York: Sheed and Ward. Perret, Jacques (1964). Horace. Bertha Humez, trans. New York: New York University Press. Putnam, Michael C.J. (1986). Artifices of Eternity: Horace's Fourth Book of Odes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. ISBN 0-8014-1852-6. Reckford, Kenneth J. (1969). Horace. New York: Twayne. Rudd, Niall, ed. (1993). Horace 2000: A Celebration – Essays for the Bimillennium. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press. ISBN 0-472-10490-X. Sydenham, Colin (2005). Horace: The Odes. Duckworth. West, David (1997). Horace The Complete Odes and Epodes. Oxford University Press. Wilkinson, L.P. (1951). Horace and His Lyric Poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. External linksEdit Horaceat Wikipedia's sister projects  Definitions from Wiktionary  Media from Wikimedia Commons  Quotations from Wikiquote  Texts from Wikisource  Data from Wikidata Works by Horace at Project Gutenberg Works by or about Horace at Internet Archive Works by Horace at LibriVox (public domain audiobooks)   Q. Horati Flacci opera, recensuerunt O. Keller et A. Holder, 2 voll., Lipsiae in aedibus B. G. Teubneri, 1864–9. Common sayings from Horace The works of Horace at The Latin Library Carmina Horatiana All Carmina of Horace in Latin recited by Thomas Bervoets. Selected Poems of Horace Works by Horace at Perseus Digital Library Biography and chronology Horace's works: text, concordances and frequency list SORGLL: Horace, Odes I.22, read by Robert Sonkowsky Translations of several odes in the original meters (with accompaniment). A discussion and comparison of three different contemporary translations of Horace's Odes Some spurious lines in the Ars Poetica? Horati opera, Acronis et Porphyrionis commentarii, varia lectio etc. (latine) Horace MS 1a Ars Poetica and Epistulae at OPenn Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Horace&oldid=992281367" Last edited on 4 December 2020, at 13:30 Content is available under CC BY-SA 3.0 unless otherwise noted. This page was last edited on 4 December 2020, at 13:30 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Terms of Use Desktop Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1021 ---- View source for Horace - Wikipedia View source for Horace ← Horace Jump to navigation Jump to search You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons: Your IP address is in a range that has been blocked on all Wikimedia Foundation wikis. The block was made by Jon Kolbert (meta.wikimedia.org). The reason given is Open Proxy: Webhost: Contact stewards if you are affected . Start of block: 20:12, 23 July 2019 Expiry of block: 20:12, 23 January 2022 Your current IP address is 40.76.139.33 and the blocked range is 40.76.0.0/16. Please include all above details in any queries you make. If you believe you were blocked by mistake, you can find additional information and instructions in the No open proxies global policy. Otherwise, to discuss the block please post a request for review on Meta-Wiki or send an email to the stewards OTRS queue at stewards@wikimedia.org including all above details. You are currently unable to edit Wikipedia due to a block affecting your IP address. This does not affect your ability to read Wikipedia pages. Most people who see this message have done nothing wrong. Some kinds of blocks restrict editing from specific service providers or telecom companies in response to recent abuse or vandalism, and affect other users who are unrelated to that abuse. See below if you do not believe you have done anything wrong. Editing from 40.76.0.0/16 has been blocked (disabled) by ‪SQL‬ for the following reason(s): The IP address that you are currently using has been blocked because it is believed to be a web host provider or colocation provider. To prevent abuse, web hosts and colocation providers may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You will not be able to edit Wikipedia using a web host or colocation provider because it hides your IP address, much like a proxy or VPN. We recommend that you attempt to use another connection to edit. For example, if you use a proxy or VPN to connect to the internet, turn it off when editing Wikipedia. If you edit using a mobile connection, try using a Wi-Fi connection, and vice versa. If you have a Wikipedia account, please log in. If you do not have any other way to edit Wikipedia, you will need to request an IP block exemption. If you are confident that you are not using a web host, you may appeal this block by adding the following text on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is _______. Place any further information here. ~~~~}}. You must fill in the blank with your IP address for this block to be investigated. Your IP address can be determined here. Alternatively, if you wish to keep your IP address private you can use the unblock ticket request system. There are several reasons you might be editing using the IP address of a web host or colocation provider (such as if you are using VPN software or a business network); please use this method of appeal only if you think your IP address is in fact not a web host or colocation provider. Administrators: The IP block exemption user right should only be applied to allow users to edit using web host in exceptional circumstances, and requests should usually be directed to the functionaries team via email. If you intend to give the IPBE user right, a CheckUser needs to take a look at the account. This can be requested most easily at SPI Quick Checkuser Requests. Unblocking an IP or IP range with this template is highly discouraged without at least contacting the blocking administrator. This block has been set to expire: 16:25, 2 June 2023. Even when blocked, you will usually still be able to edit your user talk page and email other editors and administrators. For information on how to proceed, first see the FAQ for blocked users and the guideline on block appeals. The guide to appealing blocks may also be helpful. Other useful links: Blocking policy · Help:I have been blocked You can view and copy the source of this page: ==References== * {{cite book | last=Arnold | first=Matthew | title=Selected Prose | publisher=Penguin Books | year=1970 | isbn=978-0-14-043058-5 | url=https://archive.org/details/selectedprose00arno }} * {{cite book | last=Barrow |first=R | title=The Romans | publisher=Penguin/Pelican Books | year=1949 }} * {{cite book | last=Barchiesi |first=A | title=Speaking Volumes: Narrative and Intertext in Ovid and Other Latin Poets | publisher=Duckworth| year=2001 }} * {{cite book | last=Bischoff |first=B | title=Classical Influences on European Culture AD 500–1500 | publisher=Cambridge University Press | year=1971 | chapter=Living with the satirists}} * {{cite book | last=Bush |first=Douglas | title=Milton: Poetical Works | publisher=Oxford University Press | year=1966 }} * {{cite book | last=Campbell |first=A | title=Horace: A New Interpretation | publisher=London | year=1924 }} * {{cite book | last=Conway |first=R | title=New Studies of a Great Inheritance | publisher=London | year=1921 }} * {{cite book | last=Davis |first=Gregson | title =Polyhymnia. The Rhetoric to Horatian Lyric Discourse | publisher=University of California | year=1991}} * {{cite book | last=Ferri |first=Rolando | title=The Cambridge Companion to Horace | publisher=Cambridge University Press | year=2007 | chapter=The Epistles|isbn=978-0-521-53684-4 }} * {{cite book | last=Flesch |first=William | title=The Facts on File Companion to British Poetry, 19th Century | publisher=Infobase Publishing | year=2009 |isbn= 978-0-8160-5896-9}} * {{cite book | last=Frank |first=Tenney | title=Catullus and Horace | publisher=New York | year=1928 }} * {{cite book | last=Fraenkel |first=Eduard | title=Horace | publisher=Oxford University Press | year=1957 }} * {{cite book | last=Friis-Jensen |first=Karsten | title=The Cambridge Companion to Horace | publisher=Cambridge University Press | year=2007 | chapter=Horace in the Middle Ages}} * {{cite book | last=Griffin |first=Jasper | title=Horace 2000 | publisher=Ann Arbor | year=1993 | chapter=Horace in the Thirties}} * {{cite book | last=Griffin |first=Jasper | title=The Cambridge Companion to Horace | publisher=Cambridge university Press | year=2007 | chapter=Gods and religion}} * {{cite book | last=Harrison |first=Stephen | title=A Companion to Latin Literature | publisher=Blackwell Publishing | year=2005 | chapter=Lyric and Iambic}} * {{cite book | last=Harrison |first=Stephen | title=The Cambridge Companion to Horace | publisher=Cambridge University Press | year=2007 | chapter=Introduction}} * {{cite book | last=Harrison |first=Stephen | title=The Cambridge Companion to Horace | publisher=Cambridge University Press | year=2007 | chapter=Style and poetic texture}} * {{cite book | last=Harrison |first=Stephen | title=The Cambridge Companion to Horace | publisher=Cambridge University Press | year=2007 | chapter=The nineteenth and twentieth centuries}} * {{cite book | last=Hooley |first=D | title=The Knotted Thong: Structures of Mimesis in Persius | publisher=Ann Arbor | year=1997 }} * {{cite book | last=Hutchinson |first=G | title=Classical Quarterly 52 | year=2002| chapter=The publication and individuality of Horace's Odes 1–3}} * {{cite book | last=Kiernan |first=Victor | title=Horace: Poetics and Politics| publisher=St Martin's Press | year=1999 }} * {{cite book | last=Kupersmith |first=W | title=Roman Satirists in Seventeenth Century England | publisher=Lincoln, Nebraska and London | year=1985 }} * {{cite book | last=Loveling |first=Benjamin | title=Latin and English Poems, by a Gentleman of Trinity College, Oxford | publisher=London | year=1741 }} * {{cite book | last=Lowrie |first=Michèle | title =Horace's Narrative Odes | publisher=Oxford University Press | year=1997}} * {{cite book | last=Lyne |first=R | title=The Oxford History of the Classical World | publisher=Oxford University Press | year=1986 | chapter=Augustan Poetry and Society}} * {{cite book | last=Mankin |first=David | title=Horace: Epodes| publisher=Cambridge university Press| year=1995 }} * {{cite book | last=McNeill |first=Randall | title=Horace | publisher=Oxford University Press | year=2010 |isbn= 978-0-19-980511-2 }} * {{cite book | last=Michie |first=James | title=The Odes of Horace | publisher=Penguin Classics | year=1967 | chapter=Horace the Man}} * {{cite book|last=Moles|first=John|title=The Cambridge Companion to Horace | publisher=Cambridge University Press | year=2007 | chapter=Philosophy and ethics}} * {{cite book | last=Money |first=David | title=The Cambridge Companion to Horace | publisher=Cambridge University Press | year=2007 | chapter=The seventeenth and eighteenth centuries}} * {{cite book | last=Morgan |first=Llewelyn | title=A Companion to Latin Literature | publisher=Blackwell Publishing | year=2005 | chapter=Satire}} * {{cite book | last=Muecke |first=Frances | title=The Cambridge Companion to Horace | publisher=Cambridge University Press | year=2007 | chapter=the Satires}} * {{cite book | last=Nisbet |first=Robin | title=The Cambridge Companion to Horace | publisher=Cambridge University Press | year=2007 | chapter=Horace: life and chronology}} * {{cite book|last=Reckford|first=K. J.|title=Horatius: the man and the hour|publisher=American Journal of Philology|volume=118|pages=538–612|year=1997}} * {{cite book | last=Rivers |first=Elias | title=Fray Luis de León: The Original Poems| publisher=Grant and Cutler| year=1983 }} * {{cite book | last=Rossetti |first=Christina | title=The Complete Poems | publisher=Penguin Books | year=2001 }} * {{cite book | last=Rudd |first=Niall | title=The Satires of Horace and Persius| publisher=Penguin Classics | year=1973 }} * {{cite book | last=Santirocco |first=Matthew | title =Unity and Design in Horace's Odes | url=https://archive.org/details/unitydesigninhor00sant | url-access=registration | publisher=University of North Carolina | year=1986}} * {{cite book | last=Syme |first=R | title=The Augustan Aristocracy | publisher=Oxford University Press | year=1986 }} * {{cite book | last=Talbot |first=J | title=Notes and Queries 48 (1) | publisher=Oxford University Press | year=2001 | chapter=A Horatian Pun in Paradise Lost}} * {{cite book | last=Tarrant |first=Richard | title=The Cambridge Companion to Horace | publisher=Cambridge University Press | year=2007 | chapter=Ancient receptions of Horace}} * {{cite book | last=Tollet |first=Elizabeth | title=Poems on Several Occasions | publisher=London | year=1755 }} Return to Horace. Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horace" Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Page information Wikidata item Languages Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1033 ---- Prudentius - Wikipedia Prudentius From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Roman writer For the ninth-century writer and bishop, see Prudentius of Troyes. Aurelius Prudentius Clemens (/pruːˈdɛnʃiəs, -ʃəs/) was a Roman Christian poet, born in the Roman province of Tarraconensis (now Northern Spain) in 348.[1] He probably died in the Iberian Peninsula some time after 405, possibly around 413. The place of his birth is uncertain, but it may have been Caesaraugusta (Saragossa), Tarraco (Tarragona), or Calagurris (Calahorra). Contents 1 Life 2 Poetry 3 Influence 4 Works 4.1 Editions 5 See also 6 References 7 Further reading 8 External links Life[edit] Prudentius practiced law with some success, and was twice provincial governor, perhaps in his native country, before the emperor Theodosius I summoned him to court. Towards the end of his life (possibly around 392) Prudentius retired from public life to become an ascetic, fasting until evening and abstaining entirely from animal food; and writing poems, hymns, and controversial works in defence of Christianity.[2] Prudentius later collected the Christian poems written during this period and added a preface, which he himself dated 405. Poetry[edit] The poetry of Prudentius is influenced by early Christian authors, such as Tertullian and St. Ambrose, as well as the Bible and the acts of the martyrs. His hymn Da, puer, plectrum (including "Corde natus ex parentis": "Of the Father's Love Begotten") and the hymn for Epiphany O sola magnarum urbium ("Earth Has Many A Noble City"), both from the Cathemerinon, are still in use today.[1] The allegorical Psychomachia, however, is his most influential work, incorporating as it did elements of both Hellenic epic and inner psychological conflict.[3] It became the inspiration and wellspring of medieval allegorical literature, its influence (according to C. S. Lewis) exceeding its intrinsic artistic merit.[4] In the battle between virtue and vice, full weight is given to the power of Luxuria, “Flowershod and swaying from the wine cup, Every step a fragrance”.[5] With her attendants Beauty and Pleasure, and her weapons of rose-petals and violets, she succeeds in swaying the army of Virtue “in surrender to love”,[6] before succumbing to ultimate defeat. Influence[edit] With his merger of Christianity with classical culture,[7] Prudentius was one of the most popular medieval authors,[8] being aligned as late as the 13th century alongside such figures as Horace and Statius in Henri d'Andeli's Battle of the Seven Arts between Grammar (poetry) and Logic.[9] Works[edit] The list of Prudentius's works given in the preface to his autobiography mentions the hymns, poems against the Priscillianists and against Symmachus and Peristephanon. The Diptychon is not mentioned. The twelve hymns of the Cathemerinon liber ("Daily Round") consist of six for daily use, five for festivals, and one intended for every hour of the day.[10] The specific works include: Liber Cathemerinon -- ("Book in Accordance with the Hours") comprises 12 lyric poems on various times of the day and on church festivals. Liber Peristephanon -- ("Crowns of Martyrdom") contains 14 lyric poems on Spanish and Roman martyrs. Some were suggested to Prudentius by sacred images in churches or by the inscriptions of Pope Damasus I.[10] Apotheosis -- ("Deification") attacks disclaimers of the Trinity and the divinity of Jesus. Hamartigenia -- ("The Origin of Sin") attacks the Gnostic dualism of Marcion and his followers. In this and the Apotheosis, Tertullian is the source of inspiration.[10] Psychomachia -- ("Battle of Souls") describes the struggle of faith, supported by the cardinal virtues, against idolatry and the corresponding vices. Libri contra Symmachum -- ("Books Against Symmachus") oppose the pagan senator Symmachus's requests that the altar of Victory, which had been removed by Gratian,[11] be restored to the Senate house. Dittochæon -- ("The Double Testament") contains 49 quatrains intended as captions for the murals of a basilica in Rome.[11] Editions[edit] Bergman, J. (ed.). Aurelii Prudenti Clementis carmina. Vienna: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, 1926. (Corpus Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum Latinorum, 61). Cunningham, M.P. (ed.). Aurelii Prudentii Clementis Carmina. Turnhout: Brepols, 1966 (Corpus Christianorum. Series Latina, 126). Thomson, H.J. (ed. and trans.). Prudentius. 2 vols. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1949-53 (Loeb Classical Library). Tränkle, H. (ed.). Prudentius, Contra Symmachum - Gegen Symmachus. Turnhout: Brepols, 2008. 284 p. (Fontes Christiani, 85). See also[edit] Allegory in the Middle Ages Ausonius Of the Father's Heart Begotten Paulinus of Nola Sidonius Apollinaris Quicumque Christum Quærtis References[edit] ^ a b H. J. Rose, A Handbook of Classical Literature (1967) p. 508 ^ H. J. Rose, A Handbook of Classical Literature (1967) p. 508-9 ^ Gilbert Highet, Juvenal the Satirist (1960) p. 184 ^ C. S. Lewis, The Allegory of Love (2013) p. 83 ^ Helen Waddell, The Wandering Scholars (1968) p. 48 ^ Quoted in B. Machosky, Structures of Appearing (2012) p. 85 ^ J. M. Wallace-Hadrill, The Barbarian West (1964) p. 12 ^ J. Broussard, The Civilisation of Charlemagne (1968) p. 58 ^ Helen Waddell, The Wandering Scholars (1968) p. 141-2 ^ a b c  One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Prudentius, Aurelius Clemens". Encyclopædia Britannica. 22 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 518. ^ a b Chisholm 1911. Further reading[edit] Albrecht, M. von. 1997. "Prudentius." In A History of Roman Literature: From Livius Andronicus to Boethius with Special Regard to its Influence on World Literature. Vol. 2. By M. von Albrecht. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. Cameron, A. 2011. The last Pagans of Rome. New York: Oxford Univ. Press. Conybeare, C. 2007. "Sanctum, Lector, Percense Volumen: Snakes, Readers, and the Whole Text in Prudentius’s Hamartigenia." In The Early Christian Book. Edited by W. E. Klingshirn and L. Safran, 225–240. Washington, DC: Catholic Univ. of America Press. Deferrari, Roy J., and James Marshall Campbell. 1932. A Concordance of Prudentius. Cambridge, Mass.: The Mediaeval Academy of America. Dykes, A. 2011. Reading Sin in the World: The Hamartigenia of Prudentius and the Vocation of the Responsible Reader. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press. Fux, P.-Y. 2003. Les sept passions de Prudence (Peristephanon 2.5.9. 11–14): Introduction générale et commentaire. Fribourg, Switzerland: Éditions Univ. Fribourg Suisse. Fux, Pierre-Yves. 2013. Prudence et les martyrs: hymnes et tragédie (Peristephanon 1.3-4.6-8.10). Commentaire , Paradosis 55, Fribourg. Krollpfeifer, Lydia 2017. Rom bei Prudentius. Dichtung und Weltanschauung in »Contra orationem Symmachi« (=Vertumnus. Berliner Beiträge zur Klassischen Philologie und zu ihren Nachbargebieten. Vol. 12). Goettingen: Edition Ruprecht. Lease, Emory B. 1895. A Syntactic, Stylistic and Metrical Study of Prudentius. Baltimore: The Friedenwald Company. Malamud, M. 1989. A Poetics of Transformation: Prudentius and Classical Mythology. Ithaca, NY, and London: Cornell Univ. Press. Malamud, M. A. 1990. "Making a Virtue of Perversity: The Poetry of Prudentius." In The Imperial Muse: Ramus Essays on Roman Literature of the Empire. Edited by A. J. Boyle, 64–88. Bendigo, Australia: Aureal. Mastrangelo, M. 2008. The Roman Self in Late Antiquity: Prudentius and the Poetics of the Soul. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press O’Daly, G. 2011. "Choosing to be a Christian poet: Prudentius, Praefatio and Cathemerinon 2.37–56." In Noctes Sinenses: Festschrift für Fritz-Heiner Mutschler zum 65. Geburtstag. Edited by A. Heil, M. Korn, and J. Sauer, 373–378. Heidelberg, Germany: Winter. Palmer, A.M. 1989. Prudentius on the Martyrs. Oxford: Clarendon. Pucci, J. 1991. "Prudentius’ Readings of Horace in the Cathemerinon." Latomus 50:677–690. Roberts, M. 1993. Poetry and the Cult of the Martyrs: The Liber Peristephanon of Prudentius. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press. Roberts, M. 2001. "Rome Personified, Rome Epitomized: Representations of Rome in the Poetry of the Early Fifth Century." American Journal of Philology 122:533–565. Witke, C. 1968. "Prudentius and the Tradition of Latin Poetry." Transactions of the American Philological Association 99:509–525. External links[edit] Wikiquote has quotations related to: Prudentius Library resources about Prudentius Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries By Prudentius Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries Works by Prudentius at Perseus Digital Library Works by Prudentius at Project Gutenberg Works by or about Prudentius at Internet Archive Prudentius, Loeb Classical Library, Volume I - Latin and English, H. J. Thomson, 1949 Prudentius, Loeb Classical Library, Volume II - Latin and English, H. J. Thomson, 1953 Liber peristephanon - Latin text. The Catholic Encyclopedia The Christian Classics Ethereal Library Opera Omnia by Migne's Patrologia Latina with analytical indexes v t e Seven virtues in Christian ethics Four cardinal virtues Prudence (Prudentia) Justice (Iustitia) Fortitude (Fortitudo) Temperance (Temperantia) Sources: Plato Republic, Book IV Cicero Ambrose Augustine of Hippo Thomas Aquinas Three theological virtues Faith (Fides) Hope (Spes) Love (Caritas) Sources: Paul the Apostle 1 Corinthians 13 Seven deadly sins Lust (Luxuria) Gluttony (Gula) Greed (Avaritia) Sloth (Acedia) Wrath (Ira) Envy (Invidia) Pride (Superbia) Source: Prudentius, Psychomachia People: Evagrius Ponticus John Cassian Pope Gregory I Dante Alighieri Peter Binsfeld Related concepts Ten Commandments Great Commandment Eschatology Sin Original sin Old Covenant Hamartiology Christian philosophy Authority control BIBSYS: 90600511 BNE: XX880437 BNF: cb120304005 (data) CANTIC: a10322334 CiNii: DA01427044 GND: 118596829 ISNI: 0000 0001 2117 8930 LCCN: n79063458 LNB: 000291029 MBA: b522375b-a5b5-4d7b-84ee-7e34a4473818 NDL: 00525326 NKC: jn19981002051 NLA: 35844871 NLG: 163831 NLI: 000108081 NLP: A11810087 NSK: 000108068 NTA: 069140588 RERO: 02-A000133637 SELIBR: 196747 SNAC: w6r21m6v SUDOC: 028475933 Trove: 1113002 VcBA: 495/55273 VIAF: 100010336 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n79063458 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Prudentius&oldid=996457744" Categories: Romans from Hispania Christian writers Christian poets 4th-century Romans 5th-century Romans 4th-century Christians 5th-century Christians 4th-century Latin writers 5th-century Latin writers 4th-century Roman poets 5th-century Roman poets 5th-century deaths Aurelii Hidden categories: Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica with Wikisource reference Wikipedia articles incorporating text from the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica Articles with short description Short description matches Wikidata Articles with Project Gutenberg links Articles with Internet Archive links Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CANTIC identifiers Wikipedia articles with CINII identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with LNB identifiers Wikipedia articles with MusicBrainz identifiers Wikipedia articles with NDL identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLG identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLI identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLP identifiers Wikipedia articles with NSK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with RERO identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SNAC-ID identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with Trove identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers AC with 25 elements Year of birth unknown Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikiquote Wikisource Languages Asturianu Български Brezhoneg Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara Français 한국어 Bahasa Indonesia Italiano Latina Magyar Mirandés Nederlands Norsk bokmål Polski Português Русский Slovenčina Slovenščina Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Українська 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 26 December 2020, at 18:55 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1038 ---- Lutetia - Wikipedia Lutetia From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Roman city, predecessor of Paris For other uses, see Lutetia (disambiguation). "Lutecia" redirects here. For a car also known as Lutecia, see Renault Clio. For the municipality in Brazil, see Lutécia. For the compound of the element lutetium sometimes called lutecia, see Lutetium(III) oxide. This article may be expanded with text translated from the corresponding article in French. (July 2016) Click [show] for important translation instructions. View a machine-translated version of the French article. Machine translation like DeepL or Google Translate is a useful starting point for translations, but translators must revise errors as necessary and confirm that the translation is accurate, rather than simply copy-pasting machine-translated text into the English Wikipedia. Do not translate text that appears unreliable or low-quality. If possible, verify the text with references provided in the foreign-language article. You must provide copyright attribution in the edit summary accompanying your translation by providing an interlanguage link to the source of your translation. A model attribution edit summary Content in this edit is translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Lutèce]]; see its history for attribution. You should also add the template {{Translated|fr|Lutèce}} to the talk page. For more guidance, see Wikipedia:Translation. Lutetia Maps of Paris (Paris sous les Romains) from Histoire et Geographie: Atlas General by Paul Vidal de La Blache Location within France Location Paris, France Coordinates 48°51′N 2°21′E / 48.85°N 2.35°E / 48.85; 2.35Coordinates: 48°51′N 2°21′E / 48.85°N 2.35°E / 48.85; 2.35 Type Roman city History Periods Roman Republic to Roman Empire A map of Gaul in the 1st century BC, showing the location of Lutetia and relative positions of the Celtic tribes. The Roman city of Lutetia (also Lutetia Parisiorum in Latin, in French Lutèce) was the predecessor of present-day Paris. Impressive monumental remains of the ancient city are visible in situ. Contents 1 Etymology 2 Gallic origins 3 Roman Lutetia 4 Remains 5 May 2006 findings 6 Legacy 7 References 8 Further reading 9 External links Etymology[edit] The term Lutetia [l̪ˠʊˈt̪ɛ.t̪i.a] derives from Latin meaning, "place near a swamp". The name may contain the Celtic root *luco-t-, which means "mouse" and -ek(t)ia, meaning "the mice" and which is contained in the Breton word logod, the Welsh llygod, and the Irish luch.[1] Alternatively, it may derive from another Celtic root, *luto- or *luteuo-, which means "marsh" or "swamp" and which survives today in the Scottish Gaelic lòn ("pool, meadow") and the Breton loudour ("dirty").[2] Gallic origins[edit] Roman city wall of Paris, 4th century Archaeological excavations between 1994 and 2005 show that the location of Gallic Lutetia lay in Nanterre, a large area of proto-urbanisation of several main streets and hundreds of houses over 15 hectares in the suburbs of Paris, not far from the future location of Lutetia.[3] In 52 BC, a year or so before the end of Julius Caesar's Gallic Wars, the Battle of Lutetia was fought with the local Parisii tribe.[4] However the garrison led by Vercingetorix's lieutenant Camulogenus, whose army camped on Mons Lutetius, fell to the Roman military forces led by Titus Labienus, one of Caesar's generals who captured and burned the stronghold. The Romans also crushed the Gauls at nearby Melun and took control of Lutetia. Roman Lutetia[edit] Model of the "pilier des nautes" 1st century AD, Musee Cluny The Roman city[5] was centred on the hill on the south bank of the river (the Montagne Sainte-Geneviève), as the low-lying plain near the river was easily flooded[6] though still initially suitable for farming.[5] The regular Roman street plan of Lutetia was established with the north–south axis, possibly dictated by the need to cross the marshy riverbanks in the shortest possible distance, but also aligning with the standard Roman orientation for a cardo maximus. Two main routes converged at the bridgehead over the Seine: one road coming from Spain (today's Rue Saint-Jacques) via Orléans was used as the main axis (cardo maximus), and the other road from Rome (today's rue Galande and further on rue Mouffetard) via Lyon. Dendrochronological study of wooden pilings beneath the lowest stratum of the Roman north–south axis date the road's construction after 4 AD, more than fifty years after the Roman pacification of the region. On the north bank the Rue St-Martin continues the Roman main axis (cardo maximus). The street plan and the boundaries of the main monuments—the forum at the top of the hill, theatre, baths—show that the Roman city was laid out with blocks or insulae of 300 Roman feet. The development of the city began under Augustus and was well advanced in the early 1st century AD when the elaborate Pilier des Nautes (pillar of the boatmen) was erected by a corporation of local river merchants and sailors (nautes) and dedicated to Tiberius and to several gods, showing that there was an important port on the river. Major public works and monuments were constructed in the 2nd century AD.[7] Lutetia expanded with a population estimated at around 8,000 but did not have a great deal of political importance—the capital of its province, Lugdunensis Senona, was Agedincum (modern Sens, Yonne). An aqueduct 26 km in length, with a flow rate estimated at 2,000 cubic metres a day, provided the city with spring water collected from several points. To bridge the Bièvre valley at Arcueil-Cachan, a bridge was required, whose piers and ruined arches, still discernible, gave rise to the toponym Arcueil. In the 3rd century St Denis became the city's first bishop and in about 250 AD he and two companions were arrested and decapitated on the hill of Mons Mercurius thereafter known as Mons Martyrum (Martyrs' Hill, or Montmartre) where Roman foundations have been found. After a barbarian attack in 275 by the Franks and Alemanni that destroyed much of the south bank portions of the city, the population moved to the island and a surrounding wall was built on the Île de la Cité from large stones taken from damaged structures.[6] The city on the south bank along with the main public buildings including baths, the theatres and the amphitheatre were gradually abandoned. In 357–358 Julian II, as Caesar of the Western empire and general of the Gallic legions, moved the Roman capital of Gaul from Trier to Paris which, after defeating the Franks in a major battle at Strasbourg in 357, he defended against Germanic invaders coming from the north. He was proclaimed emperor by his troops in 360 in Lutetia. Later Valentinian I resided in Lutetia for a brief period (365–366).[8] Lutetia was gradually renamed Paris,[9] taking its name from the Parisii. The name had already been used for centuries as an adjective ("Parisiacus"). The legend of the Breton city of Ys suggests a different, if less likely, origin. Model of forum of Lutetia, Musée Carnavalet Aqueduct in Paris 14e, rue de l'Empereur-Valentinien Remains[edit] Remains of the ancient city are mainly buried below ground although many of these are gradually being discovered. Those visible include: The theatre, Arènes de Lutèce in a small park on high ground in the Latin Quarter of the Left Bank, tucked behind apartment blocks. In the 1st century AD, built into the slope of the hillside outside the Roman city, it was one of the largest such structures in Gaul. It could once seat 15,000 people and was used also as an amphitheatre to show gladiatorial combats. Public thermal baths, Thermes de Cluny. Now the Musée de Cluny, the existing building is only a part of the original covering several hectares that stretched from Boulevard Saint-Germain to Rue des Ecoles and Boulevard Saint-Michel. Built at the end of the 1st/beginning of the 2nd century AD at the corner of the cardo and decumanus. First probable destruction during the invasion by the Franks and Alamans in 275. The frigidarium, with intact vault, and the caldarium are the main remaining rooms which were originally clad internally with mosaics, marble or paintings. The northern side was occupied by two gymnasia and the centre of the facade on this side was occupied by a monumental fountain. Underground is a set of cellars and vaulted galleries where the drain for emptying the frigidarium pool is visible.[10] Water flowed out through a drain that encircled the baths and ran into a main drain located under Boulevard Saint-Michel. The Archaeological Crypt under the Notre-Dame forecourt including a section of the quay wall of the ancient port, a public bath with hypocaust heating, part of the city wall from the beginning of the 4th century. The Aqueduct[11] Wall of the forum Many artifacts from Lutetia have been recovered and are on display at the Musée Carnavalet. The Arènes de Lutèce in the 5th arrondissement of Paris Model of the Arènes de Lutèce Thermes de Cluny – caldarium May 2006 findings[edit] In May 2006, a Roman road was found during expansion of the University of Pierre and Marie Curie campus. Remains of private houses dating from the reign of Augustus (27 BC – 14 AD) and containing heated floors were found. Everyday items like flowerpots, bronze chains, ceramics, and drawer handles were found. The owners were wealthy enough to own baths found in one of the homes, a status symbol among Roman citizens. Legacy[edit] Several scientific discoveries have been named after Lutetia. The element lutetium was named in honor of its discovery in a Paris laboratory, and the characteristic building material of the city of Paris—Lutetian Limestone—derives from the ancient name. The "Lutetian" is, in the geologic timescale, a stage or age in the Eocene Epoch. The asteroid 21 Lutetia, discovered in 1852 by Hermann Goldschmidt, is named after the city. Lutetia is featured in the French comic series The Adventures of Asterix, most notably in Asterix and the Golden Sickle, Asterix and the Banquet and Asterix and the Laurel Wreath. References[edit] ^ La langue gauloise, Pierre-Yves Lambert, éditions errance 1994. ^ Dictionnaire de la langue gauloise, Xavier Delamarre, éditions errance 2003. ^ Nanterre et les Parisii : Une capitale au temps des Gaulois ?, Antide Viand, ISBN 978-2757201626 ^ Julius Caesar: De Bello Gallico, VII 62 ^ a b "Paris, a Roman city". www.paris.culture.fr. ^ a b Fleury, M., "Lutetia Parisiorum", The Princeton encyclopedia of classical sites, (Richard Stillwell, William L.MacDonald, and Marian Holland McAlister,eds.) Princeton, N.J. Princeton University Press. 1976 ^ 2 Roman and Medieval Paris, Clifton Ellis, PhD Architectural History, Texas Tech College of Architecture - TTU College of Architecture ^ Goudineau, Christian, "Lutetia" in Dictionary of Antiquity under the direction of Jean Leclant. PUF. 2005 ^ The City of Antiquity Archived 2008-12-12 at the Wayback Machine, official history of Paris by The Paris Convention and Visitors Bureau ^ Alain Bouet and Florence Saragoza, "Les Thermes de Cluny", the Archeologia files, no. 323, p. 25 ^ "Roman aqueducts: Paris (country)". www.romanaqueducts.info. Further reading[edit] Philippe de Carbonnières, Lutèce: Paris ville romaine, collection Découvertes Gallimard (no. 330), série Archéologie. Éditions Gallimard, 1997, ISBN 2-07-053389-1. External links[edit] Wikimedia Commons has media related to Lutetia. "Paris, a Roman city" Arènes de Lutèce - Paris Parks & Gardens v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lutetia&oldid=995800981" Categories: Archaeological sites in France Celtic towns Populated places in pre-Roman Gaul Roman Paris Roman towns and cities in France Hidden categories: Webarchive template wayback links Articles with short description Short description matches Wikidata Articles to be expanded from July 2016 All articles to be expanded Articles needing translation from French Wikipedia Coordinates on Wikidata Commons link is on Wikidata Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Languages Беларуская Български Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara Français 한국어 Հայերեն Hrvatski Bahasa Indonesia Italiano עברית Latina Lëtzebuergesch Magyar Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Occitan Polski Português Română Русский Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Svenska Українська Vèneto Tiếng Việt 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 22 December 2020, at 23:35 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-104 ---- Imperator - Wikipedia Imperator From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Rank in ancient Rome "Imperator Augustus" and "Imperatrix" redirect here. For the first Roman emperor, see Augustus. For the racehorse, see Imperatrix (horse). For the monarchic title of a head of state, see Emperor. For other uses, see Imperator (disambiguation). Ancient Rome This article is part of a series on the politics and government of ancient Rome Periods Roman Kingdom 753–509 BC Roman Republic 509–27 BC Roman Empire 27 BC – AD 395 Principate 27 BC – AD 284 Dominate AD 284–641 Western AD 395–476 Eastern AD 395–1453 Timeline Roman Constitution Constitution of the Kingdom Constitution of the Republic Constitution of the Empire Constitution of the Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Executive magistrates Precedent and law Roman law Ius Imperium Mos maiorum Collegiality Auctoritas Roman citizenship Cursus honorum Senatus consultum Senatus consultum ultimum Assemblies Centuriate Curiate Plebeian Tribal Ordinary magistrates Consul Praetor Quaestor Promagistrate Aedile Tribune Censor Governor Extraordinary magistrates Corrector Dictator Magister equitum Consular tribune Rex Triumviri Decemviri Titles and honours Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Praeses Praefectus Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Other countries v t e The Latin word "imperator" derives from the stem of the verb imperare, meaning 'to order, to command'. It was originally employed as a title roughly equivalent to commander under the Roman Republic. Later it became a part of the titulature of the Roman Emperors as part of their cognomen. The English word emperor derives from imperator via Old French: Empereür. The Roman emperors themselves generally based their authority on multiple titles and positions, rather than preferring any single title. Nevertheless, imperator was used relatively consistently as an element of a Roman ruler's title throughout the principate and the dominate. Contents 1 Imperatores in the ancient Roman Kingdom 2 Imperatores in the Roman Republic 3 Imperator as an imperial title 4 Post-Roman use 5 Imperatrix 6 Derivatives 7 References 8 Bibliography Imperatores in the ancient Roman Kingdom[edit] When Rome was ruled by kings,[1] to be able to rule, the king had to be invested with the full regal authority and power. So, after the comitia curiata, held to elect the king, the king also had to be conferred the imperium.[2] Imperatores in the Roman Republic[edit] In Roman Republican literature and epigraphy, an imperator was a magistrate with imperium.[3] But also, mainly in the later Roman Republic and during the late Republican civil wars, imperator was the honorific title assumed by certain military commanders. After an especially great victory, an army's troops in the field would proclaim their commander imperator, an acclamation necessary for a general to apply to the Senate for a triumph. After being acclaimed imperator, the victorious general had a right to use the title after his name until the time of his triumph, where he would relinquish the title as well as his imperium. Since a triumph was the goal of many politically ambitious Roman commanders, Roman Republican history is full of cases where legions were bribed to call their commander imperator. The title of imperator was given in 90 BC to Lucius Julius Caesar, in 84 BC to Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus, in 60 BC to Gaius Julius Caesar, relative of the previously mentioned Lucius Julius Caesar, in the 50s to Gaius Julius Caesar (in Gaul), in 45 BC again to Gaius Julius Caesar, in 44 BC to Marcus Iunius Brutus, and in 41 BC to Lucius Antonius (younger brother and ally of the more famous Marcus Antonius). In 15 AD Germanicus was also imperator during the empire (see below) of his adoptive father Tiberius.[4] Imperator as an imperial title[edit] After Augustus established the Roman Empire, the title imperator was generally restricted to the emperor, though in the early years of the empire it would occasionally be granted to a member of his family. As a permanent title, imperator was used as a praenomen by the Roman emperors and was taken on accession. After the reign of Tiberius, the act of being proclaimed imperator was transformed into the act of imperial accession. In fact, if a general was acclaimed by his troops as imperator, it would be tantamount to a declaration of rebellion against the ruling emperor. At first the term continued to be used in the Republican sense as a victory title but attached to the de facto monarch and head of state, rather than the actual military commander. The title followed the emperor's name along with the number of times he was acclaimed as such, for example IMP V ("imperator five times"). In time it became the title of the de facto monarch, pronounced upon (and synonymous with) their assumption. As a title imperator was generally translated into Greek as autokrator ("one who rules himself," also sometimes used as a translation for Roman dictators.) This was necessarily imprecise as it lost the nuances of Latin political thought contrasting imperium with other forms of public authority. Nevertheless, this title (along with sebastos for augustus) was used in Greek-language texts for Roman emperors from the establishment of the empire. In the east, the title continued to be used into the Byzantine period, though to a lesser, and much more ceremonial, extent. In most Byzantine writings, the Greek translation "Autokrator" is preferred, but "Imperator" makes an appearance in Constantine IV's mid 7th century mosaic in the Basilica of Sant'Apollinare in Classe, and on various 9th century lead seals. Post-Roman use[edit] After the Roman empire collapsed in the West in the 5th century, Latin continued to be used as the language of learning and diplomacy for some centuries. The Roman emperors of this period (referred to by modern historians as the Byzantine emperors) were referred to as imperatores in Latin texts, while the word basileus (king) was used in Greek. After 800, the imperator was used (in conjunction with augustus) as a formal Latin title in succession by the Carolingian and German Holy Roman Emperors until 1806 and by the Austrian Emperors until 1918. In medieval Spain, the title imperator was used under a variety of circumstances from the ninth century onwards, but its usage peaked, as a formal and practical title, between 1086 and 1157. It was primarily used by the Kings of León and Castile, but it also found currency in the Kingdom of Navarre and was employed by the Counts of Castile and at least one Duke of Galicia. It signalled at various points the king's equality with the Byzantine Emperor and Holy Roman Emperor, his rule by conquest or military superiority, his rule over several people groups ethnic or religious, and his claim to suzerainty over the other kings of the peninsula, both Christian and Muslim. Beginning in 1077 Alfonso instituted the use of the style ego Adefonsus imperator totius Hispaniae ("I, Alfonso, emperor of all Spain") and its use soon became regular.[5] This title was used throughout the period 1079–81, which represents the peak of his imperial pretensions before his capture of the city of Toledo, ancient capital of the Visigoths. In 1080 he introduced the form ego Adefonsus Hispaniarum imperator ("I, Alfonso, emperor of the Spains"), which he used again in 1090. His most elaborate imperial title was ego Adefonsus imperator totius Castelle et Toleto necnon et Nazare seu Alave ("I, Alfonso, emperor of all Castile and of Toledo also and of Nájera, or Álava").[6] After the Ottoman Empire conquered both the Balkan peninsula (Rumeli in Turkish meaning "lands of Rome") and Constantinople, the Turkish ruler acclaimed himself Caesar of Rome (sultan-ı iklim-i Rûm). In the 15th century Bayezid II established diplomatic relations with some Christian European states, and sent a document to the King of Poland in which he used the titles Sultan Dei gratia Asie, Grecie etc. İmperator Maximus ("with help of God, emperor of Asia and Greece"). Like his predecessor, Selim I titled himself imperator in diplomatic correspondence (per la Divina favente clementia Grande Imperator di Constantinopoli, di Asia, Europa, Persia, Soria et Egipto et Arabia et de li mari etc.) due to his military successes.[7] In 1721, as part of his drive to both westernize the Russian Empire and assert the monarchy's claim that it was the successor to the Byzantine emperors, Peter the Great imported the Latin word directly into Russian and styled himself imperator (Императоръ). The style remained the official one for all his successors down to the end of the Russian Empire in 1917, though the Russian rulers continued to be colloquially known as tsar (a word derived from "Caesar"), which they had begun to use c. 1480 to likewise assert their contention to be the heirs to the Byzantine state (see: Third Rome.) Reigning female Russian rulers were styled imperatritsa. Signature of King Edward VIII. The "R" and "I" after his name indicate Rex ("king") and Imperator ("emperor") respectively. German East African Roupie, 1890. Coins of European Colonial Empires were sometimes inscribed in Latin, such as this colonial coin featuring Wilhelm II of Germany. Napoleon famously adopted the title for himself and after the Napoleonic wars, the number of emperors in Europe proliferated, but Latin began to fall out of use for all but the most ceremonial situations. Still, in those rare cases in which a European monarch's Latin titles were used, imperator was used as a translation for emperor. Famously, after assuming the title Emperor of India, British monarchs would follow their signatures with the initials RI, standing for rex imperator ("king-emperor"). George VI of the United Kingdom was the last European ruler to claim an imperial title; when he abdicated as Emperor of India in 1948, the last active use of the title imperator in the West ceased. It was thereafter used only historically, or as a Latin translation for certain continuing titles of non-European cultures, such as Japan. The imperial title was also adopted by Jean-Bédel Bokassa, during his reign as the emperor of the short-lived Central African Empire (1976–79). Imperatrix[edit] The term imperatrix seems not to have been used in Ancient Rome to indicate the consort of an imperator or later of an Emperor. In the early years of the Roman Empire there was no standard title or honorific for the Emperor's wife, even the "Augusta" honorific was rather exceptionally granted, and not exclusively to wives of living emperors. It is not clear when the feminine form of the Latin term imperator originated or was used for the first time. It usually indicates a reigning monarch, and is thus used in the Latin version of titles of modern reigning Empresses. Likewise, when Fortuna is qualified "imperatrix mundi" in the Carmina Burana there's no implication of any type of consort — the term describes (the Goddess or personified) Fortune "ruling the world". In Christian context, Imperatrix became a laudatory address to the Virgin Mary, in diverse forms at least since the Middle Ages — for example, she is sometimes called "Imperatrix angelorum" ("ruler of the angels"). Derivatives[edit] Imperator is the root of most Romance languages' word for emperor. It is the root of the English word "emperor", which entered the language via the French empereur, while related adjectives like "imperial" were imported into English directly from Latin. References[edit] ^ Rex.A Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities, John Murray, London, 1875. ^ LacusCurtius • Roman Law — Auctor (Smith's Dictionary, 1875) ^ Rivero (2006). ^ Tacitus, The Annals 1.58 ^ Reilly 1988, 137. ^ García Gallo 1945, 214. ^ Kołodziejczyk, Dariusz. "Khan, caliph, tsar and imperator: the multiple identities of the Ottoman sultan". cambridge.org. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved 2012. Check date values in: |access-date= (help) Bibliography[edit] Combès, Robert (1966). Imperator : Recherches sur l’emploi et la signification du titre d’Imperator dans la Rome républicaine. Paris: Presses universitaires de France; Publications de la Faculté des Lettres et Sciences humaines de l’Université de Montpellier. Archived from the original on 2010-12-30. 489 p. Rivero, Pilar (2006). Imperator Populi Romani: una aproximación al poder republicano. Zaragoza: Institución Fernando el Católico. 514 p. (Biblioteca virtual at http://ifc.dpz.es). v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films v t e Highest military ranks General officer Flag officer Air officer Ancient Autokrator Beylerbey Grand Constable of France Domestic of the Schools Dux bellorum Grand Domestic Imperator Ispahsalar Magister militum Megas doux Polemarch Rigsmarsk Sardar Shōgun Spahbed Voivode Modern Admiral of the Navy Aluf Da yuan shuai Dai-gensui First marshal of the empire General of the Air Force General of the Armies Generalfeldmarschall Generalissimo Generalissimus of the Soviet Union Grand marshal Chom Thap Thai Hetman Jenderal besar Marshal 'Mareşal' Marshal of Italy Marshal of the air force Marshal of the Mongolian People's Republic Marshal of Peru Marshal of the Russian Federation Marshal of the Soviet Union Marshal of Yugoslavia Vojvoda (Serbia and Yugoslavia) Mushir Reichsmarschall Serasker Supreme Allied Commander Taewonsu Wonsu Yuan shuai Authority control GND: 4435136-7 LCCN: sh85064621 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Imperator&oldid=995359334" Categories: Ancient Roman titles Military ranks of ancient Rome Military awards and decorations of ancient Rome Latin political words and phrases Hidden categories: CS1 errors: dates Articles with short description Short description matches Wikidata Articles containing Latin-language text Articles containing Old French (842-ca. 1400)-language text Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages العربية Bân-lâm-gú Беларуская Català Čeština Deutsch Eesti Español Esperanto Français 한국어 Հայերեն Hrvatski Ido Italiano עברית Кыргызча Magyar Македонски Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Polski Português Română Русский Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Українська 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 20 December 2020, at 16:43 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1055 ---- File:Horatii Flacci Sermonum.tif - Wikipedia File:Horatii Flacci Sermonum.tif From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search File File history File usage Global file usage Metadata Size of this JPG preview of this TIF file: 412 × 600 pixels. Other resolutions: 165 × 240 pixels | 329 × 480 pixels | 527 × 768 pixels | 703 × 1,024 pixels | 4,152 × 6,046 pixels. Original file ‎(4,152 × 6,046 pixels, file size: 72.03 MB, MIME type: image/tiff) This is a file from the Wikimedia Commons. Information from its description page there is shown below. Commons is a freely licensed media file repository. You can help. Summary DescriptionHoratii Flacci Sermonum.tif Latina: Horatii Flacci Sermonum Date 1577 Source Available in the BEIC digital library and uploaded in partnership with BEIC Foundation. Author Horatius Flaccus, Quintus Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse This work is in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 70 years or fewer. This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published (or registered with the U.S. Copyright Office) before January 1, 1925. This file has been identified as being free of known restrictions under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights. https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/PDMCreative Commons Public Domain Mark 1.0falsefalse File history Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time. Date/Time Thumbnail Dimensions User Comment current 11:56, 28 July 2016 4,152 × 6,046 (72.03 MB) Marcella Medici (BEIC) User created page with UploadWizard File usage The following pages on the English Wikipedia use this file (pages on other projects are not listed): Horace Global file usage The following other wikis use this file: Usage on az.wikiquote.org Horatsi Usage on ba.wikipedia.org Гораций Usage on bg.wikiquote.org Хораций Usage on br.wikiquote.org Horatius Usage on ca.wikipedia.org Josep Pla i Casadevall Horaci Usage on cy.wikipedia.org Horas Usage on de.wikipedia.org Horaz Usage on de.wikiquote.org Horaz Usage on el.wikiquote.org Οράτιος Usage on et.wikiquote.org Horatius Usage on eu.wikipedia.org Horazio Usage on fi.wikipedia.org Horatius Usage on fr.wikipedia.org Horace Usage on fr.wikiquote.org Horace Usage on he.wikipedia.org הורטיוס Usage on hi.wikipedia.org होरेस Usage on hu.wikiquote.org Horatius Usage on hy.wikiquote.org Հորացիոս Usage on is.wikipedia.org Hóratíus Usage on is.wikiquote.org Horatius Usage on it.wikipedia.org Quinto Orazio Flacco Usage on ja.wikipedia.org ホラティウス Usage on ja.wikiquote.org ホラティウス Usage on ka.wikipedia.org ჰორაციუსი Usage on kk.wikipedia.org Гораций Usage on la.wikipedia.org Sermones (Horatius) Usage on la.wikiquote.org Quintus Horatius Flaccus Usage on lt.wikiquote.org Horacijus Usage on no.wikipedia.org Horats Usage on no.wikiquote.org Horats Usage on oc.wikipedia.org Oraci Usage on pl.wikiquote.org Horacy Usage on pt.wikipedia.org Horácio Usage on pt.wikiquote.org Horácio Usage on roa-tara.wikipedia.org Quinde Orazio Flacco Usage on ro.wikipedia.org Quintus Horatius Flaccus Usage on ro.wikiquote.org Quintus Horatius Flaccus Usage on ru.wikipedia.org Гораций Usage on sc.wikipedia.org Quinto Orazio Flacco Usage on sh.wikipedia.org Kvint Horacije Flak Usage on sk.wikipedia.org Horatius Usage on sk.wikiquote.org Horatius Usage on sl.wikiquote.org Horacij Usage on stq.wikipedia.org Quintus Horatius Flaccus Usage on sv.wikiquote.org Horatius Usage on wa.wikipedia.org Horace Metadata This file contains additional information, probably added from the digital camera or scanner used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details may not fully reflect the modified file. Author Zeutschel Omniscan 11 Width 4,152 px Height 6,046 px Bits per component 8 8 8 Compression scheme Uncompressed Pixel composition RGB Image data location 222,860 Orientation Normal Number of components 3 Number of rows per strip 6,046 Bytes per compressed strip 75,308,976 Horizontal resolution 400 dpi Vertical resolution 400 dpi Data arrangement chunky format Software used ImageGear Version: 13.07.000 File change date and time 13:25, 5 April 2013 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Horatii_Flacci_Sermonum.tif" Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces File Talk Variants Views Read View on Commons More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Upload file Special pages Printable version Page information Languages Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-105 ---- W. H. Auden - Wikipedia W. H. Auden From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia   (Redirected from W.H.Auden) Jump to navigation Jump to search Anglo-American poet W. H. Auden Auden in 1939 Born Wystan Hugh Auden (1907-02-21)21 February 1907 York, Yorkshire, England Died 29 September 1973(1973-09-29) (aged 66) Vienna, Austria Citizenship British (birth); American (1946) Education M.A. English language and literature Alma mater Christ Church, Oxford Occupation Poet Spouse(s) Erika Mann (unconsummated marriage, 1935, to provide her with a British passport) Relatives George Augustus Auden (father) Constance Rosalie Bicknell Auden (mother) John Bicknell Auden (brother) George Bernard Auden (brother) Wystan Hugh Auden (/ˈwɪstən ˈhjuː ˈɔːdən/; 21 February 1907 – 29 September 1973) was an Anglo-American poet. Auden's poetry was noted for its stylistic and technical achievement, its engagement with politics, morals, love, and religion, and its variety in tone, form, and content. Some of his best known poems are about love, such as "Funeral Blues"; on political and social themes, such as "September 1, 1939" and "The Shield of Achilles"; on cultural and psychological themes, such as The Age of Anxiety; and on religious themes such as "For the Time Being" and "Horae Canonicae".[1][2][3] He was born in York and grew up in and near Birmingham in a professional middle-class family. He attended English independent (or public) schools and studied English at Christ Church, Oxford. After a few months in Berlin in 1928–29, he spent five years (1930–35) teaching in British private preparatory schools, then travelled to Iceland and China in order to write books about his journeys. In 1939 he moved to the United States and became an American citizen in 1946, retaining his British citizenship. He taught from 1941 to 1945 in American universities, followed by occasional visiting professorships in the 1950s. From 1947 to 1957 he wintered in New York and summered in Ischia; from 1958 until the end of his life he wintered in New York (in Oxford in 1972–73) and summered in Kirchstetten, Lower Austria. He came to wide public attention with his first book Poems at the age of twenty-three in 1930; it was followed in 1932 by The Orators. Three plays written in collaboration with Christopher Isherwood between 1935 and 1938 built his reputation as a left-wing political writer. Auden moved to the United States partly to escape this reputation, and his work in the 1940s, including the long poems "For the Time Being" and "The Sea and the Mirror", focused on religious themes. He won the Pulitzer Prize for Poetry for his 1947 long poem The Age of Anxiety, the title of which became a popular phrase describing the modern era.[4] From 1956 to 1961 he was Professor of Poetry at Oxford; his lectures were popular with students and faculty, and served as the basis for his 1962 prose collection The Dyer's Hand. Auden and Isherwood maintained a lasting but intermittent sexual friendship from around 1927 to 1939, while both had briefer but more intense relations with other men.[4] In 1939, Auden fell in love with Chester Kallman and regarded their relationship as a marriage, but this ended in 1941 when Kallman refused to accept the faithful relations that Auden demanded. However, the two maintained their friendship, and from 1947 until Auden's death they lived in the same house or apartment in a non-sexual relationship, often collaborating on opera libretti such as that of The Rake's Progress, to music by Igor Stravinsky. Auden was a prolific writer of prose essays and reviews on literary, political, psychological, and religious subjects, and he worked at various times on documentary films, poetic plays, and other forms of performance. Throughout his career he was both controversial and influential, and critical views on his work ranged from sharply dismissive—treating him as a lesser figure than W. B. Yeats and T. S. Eliot—to strongly affirmative, as in Joseph Brodsky's statement that he had "the greatest mind of the twentieth century". After his death, his poems became known to a much wider public than during his lifetime through films, broadcasts, and popular media. Contents 1 Life 1.1 Childhood 1.2 Education 1.3 Britain and Europe, 1928–1938 1.4 United States and Europe, 1939–1973 2 Work 2.1 Early work, 1922–1939 2.1.1 Up to 1930 2.1.2 1931–35 2.1.3 1936–39 2.2 Middle period, 1940–1957 2.2.1 1940–1946 2.2.2 1947–1957 2.3 Later work, 1958–1973 2.4 Reputation and influence 3 Published works 4 References 5 Further reading 6 External links Life[edit] Childhood[edit] Auden's birthplace in York Auden was born on Bootham in York, Yorkshire, England, to George Augustus Auden (1872–1957), a physician, and Constance Rosalie Auden (née Bicknell; 1869–1941), who had trained (but never served) as a missionary nurse.[5] He was the third of three sons; the eldest, George Bernard Auden (1900–1978), became a farmer, while the second, John Bicknell Auden (1903–1991), became a geologist.[6] The Audens were minor gentry with a strong clerical tradition, originally of Rowley Regis, later of Horninglow, Staffordshire.[7] Auden, whose grandfathers were both Church of England clergymen,[8] grew up in an Anglo-Catholic household that followed a "High" form of Anglicanism, with doctrine and ritual resembling those of Roman Catholicism.[9][4] He traced his love of music and language partly to the church services of his childhood.[10] He believed he was of Icelandic descent, and his lifelong fascination with Icelandic legends and Old Norse sagas is evident in his work.[11] His family moved to Homer Road in Solihull, near Birmingham, in 1908,[10] where his father had been appointed the School Medical Officer and Lecturer (later Professor) of Public Health. Auden's lifelong psychoanalytic interests began in his father's library. From the age of eight he attended boarding schools, returning home for holidays.[12] His visits to the Pennine landscape and its declining lead-mining industry figure in many of his poems; the remote decaying mining village of Rookhope was for him a "sacred landscape", evoked in a late poem, "Amor Loci".[13][14] Until he was fifteen he expected to become a mining engineer, but his passion for words had already begun. He wrote later: "words so excite me that a pornographic story, for example, excites me sexually more than a living person can do."[15][16] Education[edit] Auden's School - Hindhead Auden attended St Edmund's School, Hindhead, Surrey, where he met Christopher Isherwood, later famous in his own right as a novelist.[17] At thirteen he went to Gresham's School in Norfolk; there, in 1922, when his friend Robert Medley asked him if he wrote poetry, Auden first realised his vocation was to be a poet.[9] Soon after, he "discover(ed) that he (had) lost his faith" (through a gradual realisation that he had lost interest in religion, not through any decisive change of views).[18] In school productions of Shakespeare, he played Katherina in The Taming of the Shrew in 1922,[19] and Caliban in The Tempest in 1925, his last year at Gresham's.[20] His first published poems appeared in the school magazine in 1923.[21] Auden later wrote a chapter on Gresham's for Graham Greene's The Old School: Essays by Divers Hands (1934).[22] In 1925 he went up to Christ Church, Oxford, with a scholarship in biology; he switched to English by his second year, and was introduced to Old English poetry through the lectures of J. R. R. Tolkien. Friends he met at Oxford include Cecil Day-Lewis, Louis MacNeice, and Stephen Spender; these four were commonly though misleadingly identified in the 1930s as the "Auden Group" for their shared (but not identical) left-wing views. Auden left Oxford in 1928 with a third-class degree.[9][10] Auden was reintroduced to Christopher Isherwood in 1925 by his fellow student A. S. T. Fisher. For the next few years Auden sent poems to Isherwood for comments and criticism; the two maintained a sexual friendship in intervals between their relations with others. In 1935–39 they collaborated on three plays and a travel book.[23] From his Oxford years onward, Auden's friends uniformly described him as funny, extravagant, sympathetic, generous, and, partly by his own choice, lonely. In groups he was often dogmatic and overbearing in a comic way; in more private settings he was diffident and shy except when certain of his welcome. He was punctual in his habits, and obsessive about meeting deadlines, while choosing to live amidst physical disorder.[4] Britain and Europe, 1928–1938[edit] In late 1928, Auden left Britain for nine months, going to Berlin, partly to rebel against English repressiveness. In Berlin, he first experienced the political and economic unrest that became one of his central subjects.[10] On returning to Britain in 1929, he worked briefly as a tutor. In 1930 his first published book, Poems (1930), was accepted by T. S. Eliot for Faber and Faber, and the same firm remained the British publisher of all the books he published thereafter. In 1930 he began five years as a schoolmaster in boys' schools: two years at the Larchfield Academy in Helensburgh, Scotland, then three years at the Downs School in the Malvern Hills, where he was a much-loved teacher.[9] At the Downs, in June 1933, he experienced what he later described as a "Vision of Agape", while sitting with three fellow-teachers at the school, when he suddenly found that he loved them for themselves, that their existence had infinite value for him; this experience, he said, later influenced his decision to return to the Anglican Church in 1940.[24] During these years, Auden's erotic interests focused, as he later said, on an idealised "Alter Ego"[25] rather than on individual persons. His relationships (and his unsuccessful courtships) tended to be unequal either in age or intelligence; his sexual relations were transient, although some evolved into long friendships. He contrasted these relationships with what he later regarded as the "marriage" (his word) of equals that he began with Chester Kallman in 1939, based on the unique individuality of both partners.[26] From 1935 until he left Britain early in 1939, Auden worked as freelance reviewer, essayist, and lecturer, first with the GPO Film Unit, a documentary film-making branch of the post office, headed by John Grierson. Through his work for the Film Unit in 1935 he met and collaborated with Benjamin Britten, with whom he also worked on plays, song cycles, and a libretto.[27] Auden's plays in the 1930s were performed by the Group Theatre, in productions that he supervised to varying degrees.[10] His work now reflected his belief that any good artist must be "more than a bit of a reporting journalist".[28] In 1936, Auden spent three months in Iceland where he gathered material for a travel book Letters from Iceland (1937), written in collaboration with Louis MacNeice. In 1937 he went to Spain intending to drive an ambulance for the Republic in the Spanish Civil War, but was put to work writing propaganda at the Republican press and propaganda office, where he felt useless and left after a week.[29] He returned to England after a brief visit to the front at Sarineña. His seven-week visit to Spain affected him deeply, and his social views grew more complex as he found political realities to be more ambiguous and troubling than he had imagined.[26][9] Again attempting to combine reportage and art, he and Isherwood spent six months in 1938 visiting China amid the Sino-Japanese War, working on their book Journey to a War (1939). On their way back to England they stayed briefly in New York and decided to move to the United States. Auden spent late 1938 partly in England, partly in Brussels.[9] Many of Auden's poems during the 1930s and after were inspired by unconsummated love, and in the 1950s he summarised his emotional life in a famous couplet: "If equal affection cannot be / Let the more loving one be me" ("The More Loving One"). He had a gift for friendship and, starting in the late 1930s, a strong wish for the stability of marriage; in a letter to his friend James Stern he called marriage "the only subject."[30] Throughout his life, Auden performed charitable acts, sometimes in public (as in his 1935 marriage of convenience to Erika Mann that provided her with a British passport to escape the Nazis),[9] but, especially in later years, more often in private. He was embarrassed if they were publicly revealed, as when his gift to his friend Dorothy Day for the Catholic Worker movement was reported on the front page of The New York Times in 1956.[31] United States and Europe, 1939–1973[edit] Christopher Isherwood (left) and W. H. Auden (right) photographed by Carl Van Vechten, 6 February 1939 Auden and Isherwood sailed to New York City in January 1939, entering on temporary visas. Their departure from Britain was later seen by many as a betrayal, and Auden's reputation suffered.[9] In April 1939, Isherwood moved to California, and he and Auden saw each other only intermittently in later years. Around this time, Auden met the poet Chester Kallman, who became his lover for the next two years (Auden described their relation as a "marriage" that began with a cross-country "honeymoon" journey).[32] In 1941 Kallman ended their sexual relationship because he could not accept Auden's insistence on mutual fidelity,[33] but he and Auden remained companions for the rest of Auden's life, sharing houses and apartments from 1953 until Auden's death.[34] Auden dedicated both editions of his collected poetry (1945/50 and 1966) to Isherwood and Kallman.[35] In 1940–41, Auden lived in a house at 7 Middagh Street in Brooklyn Heights, that he shared with Carson McCullers, Benjamin Britten, and others, which became a famous centre of artistic life, nicknamed "February House".[36] In 1940, Auden joined the Episcopal Church, returning to the Anglican Communion he had abandoned at fifteen. His reconversion was influenced partly by what he called the "sainthood" of Charles Williams,[37] whom he had met in 1937, and partly by reading Søren Kierkegaard and Reinhold Niebuhr; his existential, this-worldly Christianity became a central element in his life.[38] Auden's grave at Kirchstetten (Lower Austria) After Britain declared war on Germany in September 1939, Auden told the British embassy in Washington that he would return to the UK if needed. He was told that, among those his age (32), only qualified personnel were needed. In 1941–42 he taught English at the University of Michigan. He was called for the draft in the United States Army in August 1942, but was rejected on medical grounds. He had been awarded a Guggenheim Fellowship for 1942–43 but did not use it, choosing instead to teach at Swarthmore College in 1942–45.[9] In mid-1945, after the end of World War II in Europe, he was in Germany with the U. S. Strategic Bombing Survey, studying the effects of Allied bombing on German morale, an experience that affected his postwar work as his visit to Spain had affected him earlier.[35] On his return, he settled in Manhattan, working as a freelance writer, a lecturer at The New School for Social Research, and a visiting professor at Bennington, Smith, and other American colleges. In 1946 he became a naturalised citizen of the US.[9][10] In 1948, Auden began spending his summers in Europe, together with Chester Kallman, first in Ischia, Italy, where he rented a house. Then, starting in 1958, he began spending his summers in Kirchstetten, Austria, where he bought a farmhouse from the prize money of the Premio Feltrinelli awarded to him in 1957.[39] He said that he shed tears of joy at owning a home for the first time.[9] In 1956–61, Auden was Professor of Poetry at Oxford University where he was required to give three lectures each year. This fairly light workload allowed him to continue to spend winter in New York, where he lived at 77 St. Mark's Place in Manhattan's East Village, and to spend summer in Europe, spending only three weeks each year lecturing in Oxford. He earned his income mostly from readings and lecture tours, and by writing for The New Yorker, The New York Review of Books, and other magazines.[10] In 1963 Kallman left the apartment he shared in New York with Auden, and lived during the winter in Athens while continuing to spend his summers with Auden in Austria. In 1972, Auden moved his winter home from New York to Oxford, where his old college, Christ Church, offered him a cottage, while he continued to spend summers in Austria. He died in Vienna in 1973, a few hours after giving a reading of his poems at the Austrian Society for Literature; his death occurred at the Hotel Altenburger Hof where he was staying overnight before his intended return to Oxford the next day.[40] He was buried in Kirchstetten.[9] Work[edit] See also: Bibliography of W. H. Auden Auden published about four hundred poems, including seven long poems (two of them book-length). His poetry was encyclopaedic in scope and method, ranging in style from obscure twentieth-century modernism to the lucid traditional forms such as ballads and limericks, from doggerel through haiku and villanelles to a "Christmas Oratorio" and a baroque eclogue in Anglo-Saxon meters.[41] The tone and content of his poems ranged from pop-song clichés to complex philosophical meditations, from the corns on his toes to atoms and stars, from contemporary crises to the evolution of society.[3][26] He also wrote more than four hundred essays and reviews about literature, history, politics, music, religion, and many other subjects. He collaborated on plays with Christopher Isherwood and on opera libretti with Chester Kallman, and worked with a group of artists and filmmakers on documentary films in the 1930s and with the New York Pro Musica early music group in the 1950s and 1960s. About collaboration he wrote in 1964: "collaboration has brought me greater erotic joy . . . than any sexual relations I have had."[42] Auden controversially rewrote or discarded some of his most famous poems when he prepared his later collected editions. He wrote that he rejected poems that he found "boring" or "dishonest" in the sense that they expressed views he had never held but had used only because he felt they would be rhetorically effective.[43] His rejected poems include "Spain" and "September 1, 1939". His literary executor, Edward Mendelson, argues in his introduction to Selected Poems that Auden's practice reflected his sense of the persuasive power of poetry and his reluctance to misuse it.[44] (Selected Poems includes some poems that Auden rejected and early texts of poems that he revised.) Early work, 1922–1939[edit] Up to 1930[edit] Cover of the privately printed Poems (1928) Auden began writing poems in 1922, at fifteen, mostly in the styles of 19th-century romantic poets, especially Wordsworth, and later poets with rural interests, especially Thomas Hardy. At eighteen he discovered T. S. Eliot and adopted an extreme version of Eliot's style. He found his own voice at twenty when he wrote the first poem later included in his collected work, "From the very first coming down".[26] This and other poems of the late 1920s tended to be in a clipped, elusive style that alluded to, but did not directly state, their themes of loneliness and loss. Twenty of these poems appeared in his first book Poems (1928), a pamphlet hand-printed by Stephen Spender.[45] In 1928 he wrote his first dramatic work, Paid on Both Sides, subtitled "A Charade", which combined style and content from the Icelandic sagas with jokes from English school life. This mixture of tragedy and farce, with a dream play-within-a-play, introduced the mixed styles and content of much of his later work.[41] This drama and thirty short poems appeared in his first published book Poems (1930, 2nd edition with seven poems replaced, 1933); the poems in the book were mostly lyrical and gnomic mediations on hoped-for or unconsummated love and on themes of personal, social, and seasonal renewal; among these poems were "It was Easter as I walked," "Doom is dark," "Sir, no man's enemy," and "This lunar beauty."[26] A recurrent theme in these early poems is the effect of "family ghosts", Auden's term for the powerful, unseen psychological effects of preceding generations on any individual life (and the title of a poem). A parallel theme, present throughout his work, is the contrast between biological evolution (unchosen and involuntary) and the psychological evolution of cultures and individuals (voluntary and deliberate even in its subconscious aspects).[41][26] 1931–35[edit] Programme of a Group Theatre production of The Dance of Death, with unsigned synopsis by Auden Auden's next large-scale work was The Orators: An English Study (1932; revised editions, 1934, 1966), in verse and prose, largely about hero-worship in personal and political life. In his shorter poems, his style became more open and accessible, and the exuberant "Six Odes" in The Orators reflect his new interest in Robert Burns.[41] During the next few years, many of his poems took their form and style from traditional ballads and popular songs, and also from expansive classical forms like the Odes of Horace, which he seems to have discovered through the German poet Hölderlin.[26] Around this time his main influences were Dante, William Langland, and Alexander Pope.[46] During these years, much of his work expressed left-wing views, and he became widely known as a political poet although he was privately more ambivalent about revolutionary politics than many reviewers recognised,[47] and Mendelson argues that he expounded political views partly out of a sense of moral duty and partly because it enhanced his reputation, and that he later regretted having done so.[48] He generally wrote about revolutionary change in terms of a "change of heart", a transformation of a society from a closed-off psychology of fear to an open psychology of love.[4] His verse drama The Dance of Death (1933) was a political extravaganza in the style of a theatrical revue, which Auden later called "a nihilistic leg-pull."[49] His next play The Dog Beneath the Skin (1935), written in collaboration with Isherwood, was similarly a quasi-Marxist updating of Gilbert and Sullivan in which the general idea of social transformation was more prominent than any specific political action or structure.[41][26] The Ascent of F6 (1937), another play written with Isherwood, was partly an anti-imperialist satire, partly (in the character of the self-destroying climber Michael Ransom) an examination of Auden's own motives in taking on a public role as a political poet.[26] This play included the first version of "Funeral Blues" ("Stop all the clocks"), written as a satiric eulogy for a politician; Auden later rewrote the poem as a "Cabaret Song" about lost love (written to be sung by the soprano Hedli Anderson, for whom he wrote many lyrics in the 1930s).[50] In 1935, he worked briefly on documentary films with the GPO Film Unit, writing his famous verse commentary for Night Mail and lyrics for other films that were among his attempts in the 1930s to create a widely accessible, socially conscious art.[41][26][50] 1936–39[edit] In 1936 Auden's publisher chose the title Look, Stranger! for a collection of political odes, love poems, comic songs, meditative lyrics, and a variety of intellectually intense but emotionally accessible verse; Auden hated the title and retitled the collection for the 1937 US edition On This Island).[26] Among the poems included in the book are "Hearing of harvests", "Out on the lawn I lie in bed", "O what is that sound", "Look, stranger, on this island now" (later revised versions change "on" to "at"), and "Our hunting fathers".[41][26] Auden was now arguing that an artist should be a kind of journalist, and he put this view into practice in Letters from Iceland (1937) a travel book in prose and verse written with Louis MacNeice, which included his long social, literary, and autobiographical commentary "Letter to Lord Byron".[51] In 1937, after observing the Spanish Civil War he wrote a politically engaged pamphlet poem Spain (1937); he later discarded it from his collected works. Journey to a War (1939) a travel book in prose and verse, was written with Isherwood after their visit to the Sino-Japanese War.[51] Auden's last collaboration with Isherwood was their third play, On the Frontier, an anti-war satire written in Broadway and West End styles.[26][10] Auden's shorter poems now engaged with the fragility and transience of personal love ("Danse Macabre", "The Dream", "Lay your sleeping head"), a subject he treated with ironic wit in his "Four Cabaret Songs for Miss Hedli Anderson" (which included "Tell Me the Truth About Love" and the revised version of "Funeral Blues"), and also the corrupting effect of public and official culture on individual lives ("Casino", "School Children", "Dover").[41][26] In 1938 he wrote a series of dark, ironic ballads about individual failure ("Miss Gee", "James Honeyman", "Victor"). All these appeared in Another Time (1940), together with poems including "Dover", "As He Is", and "Musée des Beaux Arts" (all of which were written before he moved to America in 1939), and "In Memory of W. B. Yeats", "The Unknown Citizen", "Law Like Love", "September 1, 1939", and "In Memory of Sigmund Freud" (all written in America).[41] The elegies for Yeats and Freud are partly anti-heroic statements, in which great deeds are performed, not by unique geniuses whom others cannot hope to imitate, but by otherwise ordinary individuals who were "silly like us" (Yeats) or of whom it could be said "he wasn't clever at all" (Freud), and who became teachers of others, not awe-inspiring heroes.[26] Middle period, 1940–1957[edit] 1940–1946[edit] In 1940 Auden wrote a long philosophical poem "New Year Letter", which appeared with miscellaneous notes and other poems in The Double Man (1941). At the time of his return to the Anglican Communion he began writing abstract verse on theological themes, such as "Canzone" and "Kairos and Logos". Around 1942, as he became more comfortable with religious themes, his verse became more open and relaxed, and he increasingly used the syllabic verse he had learned from the poetry of Marianne Moore.[35] Auden's work in this era addresses the artist's temptation to use other persons as material for his art rather than valuing them for themselves ("Prospero to Ariel") and the corresponding moral obligation to make and keep commitments while recognising the temptation to break them ("In Sickness and Health").[35][41] From 1942 through 1947 he worked mostly on three long poems in dramatic form, each differing from the others in form and content: "For the Time Being: A Christmas Oratorio", "The Sea and the Mirror: A Commentary on Shakespeare's The Tempest" (both published in For the Time Being, 1944), and The Age of Anxiety: A Baroque Eclogue (published separately in 1947).[35] The first two, with Auden's other new poems from 1940 to 1944, were included in his first collected edition, The Collected Poetry of W. H. Auden (1945), with most of his earlier poems, many in revised versions.[41] 1947–1957[edit] After completing The Age of Anxiety in 1946 he focused again on shorter poems, notably "A Walk After Dark", "The Love Feast", and "The Fall of Rome".[35] Many of these evoked the Italian village where he spent his summers between 1948 and 1957, and his next book, Nones (1951), had a Mediterranean atmosphere new to his work.[52] A new theme was the "sacred importance" of the human body[53] in its ordinary aspect (breathing, sleeping, eating) and the continuity with nature that the body made possible (in contrast to the division between humanity and nature that he had emphasised in the 1930s);[52] his poems on these themes included "In Praise of Limestone" (1948) and "Memorial for the City" (1949).[41][35] In 1949 Auden and Kallman wrote the libretto for Igor Stravinsky's opera The Rake's Progress, and later collaborated on two libretti for operas by Hans Werner Henze.[9][54] Auden's first separate prose book was The Enchafèd Flood: The Romantic Iconography of the Sea (1950), based on a series of lectures on the image of the sea in romantic literature.[55] Between 1949 and 1954 he worked on a sequence of seven Good Friday poems, titled "Horae Canonicae", an encyclopaedic survey of geological, biological, cultural, and personal history, focused on the irreversible act of murder; the poem was also a study in cyclical and linear ideas of time. While writing this, he also wrote "Bucolics," a sequence of seven poems about man's relation to nature. Both sequences appeared in his next book, The Shield of Achilles (1955), with other short poems, including the book's title poem, "Fleet Visit", and "Epitaph for the Unknown Soldier".[41][35] In 1955–56 Auden wrote a group of poems about "history", the term he used to mean the set of unique events made by human choices, as opposed to "nature", the set of involuntary events created by natural processes, statistics, and anonymous forces such as crowds. These poems included "T the Great", "The Maker", and the title poem of his next collection Homage to Clio (1960).[41][35] Later work, 1958–1973[edit] Auden in 1970 In the late 1950s Auden's style became less rhetorical while its range of styles increased. In 1958, having moved his summer home from Italy to Austria, he wrote "Good-bye to the Mezzogiorno"; other poems from this period include "Dichtung und Wahrheit: An Unwritten Poem", a prose poem about the relation between love and personal and poetic language, and the contrasting "Dame Kind", about the anonymous impersonal reproductive instinct. These and other poems, including his 1955–66 poems about history, appeared in Homage to Clio (1960).[41][35] His prose book The Dyer's Hand (1962) gathered many of the lectures he gave in Oxford as Professor of Poetry in 1956–61, together with revised versions of essays and notes written since the mid-1940s.[35] Among the new styles and forms in Auden's later work were the haiku and tanka that he began writing after translating the haiku and other verse in Dag Hammarskjöld's Markings.[35] A sequence of fifteen poems about his house in Austria, "Thanksgiving for a Habitat" (written in various styles that included an imitation of William Carlos Williams) appeared in About the House (1965), together with other poems that included his reflection on his lecture tours, "On the Circuit".[41] In the late 1960s he wrote some of his most vigorous poems, including "River Profile" and two poems that looked back over his life, "Prologue at Sixty" and "Forty Years On". All these appeared in City Without Walls (1969). His lifelong passion for Icelandic legend culminated in his verse translation of The Elder Edda (1969).[41][35] Among his later themes was the "religionless Christianity" he learned partly from Dietrich Bonhoeffer, the dedicatee of his poem "Friday's Child."[56] A Certain World: A Commonplace Book (1970) was a kind of self-portrait made up of favourite quotations with commentary, arranged in alphabetical order by subject.[57] His last prose book was a selection of essays and reviews, Forewords and Afterwords (1973).[9] His last books of verse, Epistle to a Godson (1972) and the unfinished Thank You, Fog (published posthumously, 1974) include reflective poems about language ("Natural Linguistics", "Aubade"), philosophy and science ("No, Plato, No", "Unpredictable but Providential"), and his own aging ("A New Year Greeting", "Talking to Myself", "A Lullaby" ["The din of work is subdued"]). His last completed poem was "Archaeology", about ritual and timelessness, two recurring themes in his later years.[35] Reputation and influence[edit] Auden's stature in modern literature has been contested. Probably the most common critical view from the 1930s onward ranked him as the last and least of the three major twentieth-century British and Irish poets—behind Yeats and Eliot—while a minority view, more prominent in recent years, ranks him as the highest of the three.[58] Opinions have ranged from those of Hugh MacDiarmid, who called him "a complete wash-out"; F. R. Leavis, who wrote that Auden's ironic style was "self-defensive, self-indulgent or merely irresponsible";[59] and Harold Bloom, who wrote "Close thy Auden, open thy [Wallace] Stevens,"[60] to the obituarist in The Times, who wrote: "W.H. Auden, for long the enfant terrible of English poetry… emerges as its undisputed master."[61] Joseph Brodsky wrote that Auden had "the greatest mind of the twentieth century".[62] Critical estimates were divided from the start. Reviewing Auden's first book, Poems (1930), Naomi Mitchison wrote "If this is really only the beginning, we have perhaps a master to look forward to."[63] But John Sparrow, recalling Mitchison's comment in 1934, dismissed Auden's early work as "a monument to the misguided aims that prevail among contemporary poets, and the fact that… he is being hailed as 'a master' shows how criticism is helping poetry on the downward path."[64] Auden's clipped, satiric, and ironic style in the 1930s was widely imitated by younger poets such as Charles Madge, who wrote in a poem "there waited for me in the summer morning / Auden fiercely. I read, shuddered, and knew."[65] He was widely described as the leader of an "Auden group" that comprised his friends Stephen Spender, Cecil Day-Lewis, and Louis MacNeice.[66] The four were mocked by the poet Roy Campbell as if they were a single undifferentiated poet named "Macspaunday."[67] Auden's propagandistic poetic plays, including The Dog Beneath the Skin and The Ascent of F6, and his political poems such as "Spain" gave him the reputation as a political poet writing in a progressive and accessible voice, in contrast to Eliot; but this political stance provoked opposing opinions, such as that of Austin Clarke who called Auden's work "liberal, democratic, and humane",[68] and John Drummond, who wrote that Auden misused a "characteristic and popularizing trick, the generalized image", to present ostensibly left-wing views that were in fact "confined to bourgeois experience."[69] Auden's departure for America in 1939 was debated in Britain (once even in Parliament), with some seeing his emigration as a betrayal. Defenders of Auden such as Geoffrey Grigson, in an introduction to a 1949 anthology of modern poetry, wrote that Auden "arches over all". His stature was suggested by book titles such as Auden and After by Francis Scarfe (1942) and The Auden Generation by Samuel Hynes (1977).[3] Commemorative plaque at one of Auden's homes in Brooklyn Heights, New York In the US, starting in the late 1930s, the detached, ironic tone of Auden's regular stanzas became influential; John Ashbery recalled that in the 1940s Auden "was the modern poet".[61] Auden's formal influences were so pervasive in American poetry that the ecstatic style of the Beat Generation was partly a reaction against his influence. From the 1940s through the 1960s, many critics lamented that Auden's work had declined from its earlier promise; Randall Jarrell wrote a series of essays making a case against Auden's later work,[70] and Philip Larkin's "What's Become of Wystan?" (1960) had a wide impact.[61][71] After his death, some of his poems, notably "Funeral Blues", "Musée des Beaux Arts", "Refugee Blues", "The Unknown Citizen", and "September 1, 1939", became known to a much wider public than during his lifetime through films, broadcasts, and popular media.[3] The first full-length study of Auden was Richard Hoggart's Auden: An Introductory Essay (1951), which concluded that "Auden's work, then, is a civilising force."[72] It was followed by Joseph Warren Beach's The Making of the Auden Canon (1957), a disapproving account of Auden's revisions of his earlier work. [73] The first systematic critical account was Monroe K. Spears' The Poetry of W. H. Auden: The Disenchanted Island (1963), "written out of the conviction that Auden's poetry can offer the reader entertainment, instruction, intellectual excitement, and a prodigal variety of aesthetic pleasures, all in a generous abundance that is unique in our time."[74] Auden was one of three candidates recommended by the Nobel Committee to the Swedish Academy for the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1963[75] and 1965[76] and six recommended for the 1964 prize.[77] By the time of his death in 1973 he had attained the status of a respected elder statesman, and a memorial stone for him was placed in Poets' Corner in Westminster Abbey in 1974.[78] The Encyclopædia Britannica writes that "by the time of Eliot's death in 1965… a convincing case could be made for the assertion that Auden was indeed Eliot's successor, as Eliot had inherited sole claim to supremacy when Yeats died in 1939."[79] With some exceptions, British critics tended to treat his early work as his best, while American critics tended to favour his middle and later work.[80][81] Another group of critics and poets has maintained that unlike other modern poets, Auden's reputation did not decline after his death, and the influence of his later writing was especially strong on younger American poets including John Ashbery, James Merrill, Anthony Hecht, and Maxine Kumin.[82] Typical later evaluations describe him as "arguably the [20th] century's greatest poet" (Peter Parker and Frank Kermode),[83] who "now clearly seems the greatest poet in English since Tennyson" (Philip Hensher).[84] Public recognition of Auden's work sharply increased after his "Funeral Blues" ("Stop all the clocks") was read aloud in the film Four Weddings and a Funeral (1994); subsequently, a pamphlet edition of ten of his poems, Tell Me the Truth About Love, sold more than 275,000 copies. After 11 September 2001 his 1939 poem "September 1, 1939" was widely circulated and frequently broadcast.[61] Public readings and broadcast tributes in the UK and US in 2007 marked his centenary year.[85] Overall, Auden's poetry was noted for its stylistic and technical achievement, its engagement with politics, morals, love, and religion, and its variety in tone, form and content.[86][62][41][26] Memorial stones and plaques commemorating Auden include those in Westminster Abbey; at his birthplace at 55 Bootham, York;[87] near his home on Lordswood Road, Birmingham;[88] in the chapel of Christ Church, Oxford; on the site of his apartment at 1 Montague Terrace, Brooklyn Heights; at his apartment in 77 St. Marks Place, New York (damaged and now removed);[89] at the site of his death at Walfischgasse 5 in Vienna;[90] and in the Rainbow Honor Walk in San Francisco.[91] In his house in Kirchstetten, his study is open to the public upon request.[92] Published works[edit] The following list includes only the books of poems and essays that Auden prepared during his lifetime; for a more complete list, including other works and posthumous editions, see W. H. Auden bibliography. In the list below, works reprinted in the Complete Works of W. H. Auden are indicated by footnote references. Books Poems (London, 1930; second edn., seven poems substituted, London, 1933; includes poems and Paid on Both Sides: A Charade[50]) (dedicated to Christopher Isherwood). The Orators: An English Study (London, 1932, verse and prose; slightly revised edn., London, 1934; revised edn. with new preface, London, 1966; New York 1967) (dedicated to Stephen Spender). The Dance of Death (London, 1933, play)[50] (dedicated to Robert Medley and Rupert Doone). Poems (New York, 1934; contains Poems [1933 edition], The Orators [1932 edition], and The Dance of Death). The Dog Beneath the Skin (London, New York, 1935; play, with Christopher Isherwood)[50] (dedicated to Robert Moody). The Ascent of F6 (London, 1936; 2nd edn., 1937; New York, 1937; play, with Christopher Isherwood)[50] (dedicated to John Bicknell Auden). Look, Stranger! (London, 1936, poems; US edn., On This Island, New York, 1937) (dedicated to Erika Mann) Letters from Iceland (London, New York, 1937; verse and prose, with Louis MacNeice)[51] (dedicated to George Augustus Auden). On the Frontier (London, 1938; New York 1939; play, with Christopher Isherwood)[50] (dedicated to Benjamin Britten). Journey to a War (London, New York, 1939; verse and prose, with Christopher Isherwood)[51] (dedicated to E. M. Forster). Another Time (London, New York 1940; poetry) (dedicated to Chester Kallman). The Double Man (New York, 1941, poems; UK edn., New Year Letter, London, 1941) (Dedicated to Elizabeth Mayer). For the Time Being (New York, 1944; London, 1945; two long poems: "The Sea and the Mirror: A Commentary on Shakespeare's The Tempest", dedicated to James and Tania Stern, and "For the Time Being: A Christmas Oratorio", in memoriam Constance Rosalie Auden [Auden's mother]). The Collected Poetry of W. H. Auden (New York, 1945; includes new poems) (dedicated to Christopher Isherwood and Chester Kallman). Full text.[93] The Age of Anxiety: A Baroque Eclogue (New York, 1947; London, 1948; verse; won the 1948 Pulitzer Prize for Poetry) (dedicated to John Betjeman). Collected Shorter Poems, 1930–1944 (London, 1950; similar to 1945 Collected Poetry) (dedicated to Christopher Isherwood and Chester Kallman). The Enchafèd Flood (New York, 1950; London, 1951; prose) (dedicated to Alan Ansen).[94] Nones (New York, 1951; London, 1952; poems) (dedicated to Reinhold and Ursula Niebuhr) The Shield of Achilles (New York, London, 1955; poems) (won the 1956 National Book Award for Poetry)[95] (dedicated to Lincoln and Fidelma Kirstein). Homage to Clio (New York, London, 1960; poems) (dedicated to E. R. and A. E. Dodds). The Dyer's Hand (New York, 1962; London, 1963; essays) (dedicated to Nevill Coghill).[96] About the House (New York, London, 1965; poems) (dedicated to Edmund and Elena Wilson). Collected Shorter Poems 1927–1957 (London, 1966; New York, 1967) (dedicated to Christopher Isherwood and Chester Kallman). Collected Longer Poems (London, 1968; New York, 1969). Secondary Worlds (London, New York, 1969; prose) (dedicated to Valerie Eliot).[97] City Without Walls and Other Poems (London, New York, 1969) (dedicated to Peter Heyworth). A Certain World: A Commonplace Book (New York, London, 1970; quotations with commentary) (dedicated to Geoffrey Grigson).[98] Epistle to a Godson and Other Poems (London, New York, 1972) (dedicated to Orlan Fox). Forewords and Afterwords (New York, London, 1973; essays) (dedicated to Hannah Arendt). Thank You, Fog: Last Poems (London, New York, 1974) (dedicated to Michael and Marny Yates). Film scripts and opera libretti Coal Face (1935, closing chorus for GPO Film Unit documentary).[50] Night Mail (1936, narrative for GPO Film Unit documentary, not published separately except as a programme note).[50] Paul Bunyan (1941, libretto for operetta by Benjamin Britten; not published until 1976).[54] The Rake's Progress (1951, with Chester Kallman, libretto for an opera by Igor Stravinsky).[54] Elegy for Young Lovers (1956, with Chester Kallman, libretto for an opera by Hans Werner Henze).[54] The Bassarids (1961, with Chester Kallman, libretto for an opera by Hans Werner Henze based on The Bacchae of Euripides).[54] Runner (1962, documentary film narrative for National Film Board of Canada)[54] Love's Labour's Lost (1973, with Chester Kallman, libretto for an opera by Nicolas Nabokov, based on Shakespeare's play).[54] Musical collaborations Our Hunting Fathers (1936, song cycle written for Benjamin Britten) An Evening of Elizabethan Verse and its Music (1954 recording with the New York Pro Musica Antiqua, director Noah Greenberg; Auden spoke the verse texts) The Play of Daniel (1958, verse narration for a production by the New York Pro Musica Antiqua, director Noah Greenberg)[54] References[edit] ^ Auden, W. H. (2002). Mendelson, Edward (ed.). Prose, Volume II: 1939–1948. Princeton: Princeton University Press. p. 478. ISBN 978-0-691-08935-5. Auden used the phrase "Anglo-American Poets" in 1943, implicitly referring to himself and T. S. Eliot. ^ The first definition of "Anglo-American" in the OED (2008 revision) is: "Of, belonging to, or involving both England (or Britain) and America.""Oxford English Dictionary (access by subscription)". Retrieved 25 May 2009. See also the definition "English in origin or birth, American by settlement or citizenship" in Chambers 20th Century Dictionary. 1969. p. 45. See also the definition "an American, especially a citizen of the United States, of English origin or descent" in Merriam Webster's New International Dictionary, Second Edition. 1969. p. 103. See also the definition "a native or descendant of a native of England who has settled in or become a citizen of America, esp. of the United States" from The Random House Dictionary, 2009, available online at "Dictionary.com". Retrieved 25 May 2009. ^ a b c d Smith, Stan, ed. (2004). The Cambridge Companion to W. H. Auden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-82962-5. ^ a b c d e Davenport-Hines, Richard (1995). Auden. London: Heinemann. ISBN 978-0-434-17507-9. ^ Carpenter, W. H. Auden, pp. 1-12. ^ The name Wystan derives from the 9th-century St Wystan, who was murdered by Beorhtfrith, the son of Beorhtwulf, king of Mercia, after Wystan objected to Beorhtfrith's plan to marry Wystan's mother. His remains were reburied at Repton, Derbyshire, where they became the object of a cult; the parish church of Repton is dedicated to St Wystan. Auden's father, George Augustus Auden, was educated at Repton School. ^ Burke's Landed Gentry, 18th edition, vol. I, ed. Peter Townend, 1965, Auden formerly of Horninglow pedigree ^ "Kindred Britain". Retrieved 12 October 2015. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Carpenter, Humphrey (1981). W. H. Auden: A Biography. London: George Allen & Unwin. ISBN 978-0-04-928044-1. ^ a b c d e f g h Mendelson, Edward (January 2011). "Auden, Wystan Hugh (1907–1973)". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/30775. Retrieved 26 May 2013. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)(subscription may be required or content may be available in libraries) ^ Davidson, Peter (2005). The Idea of North. London: Reaktion. ISBN 978-1861892300. ^ Carpenter, W. H. Auden, pp. 16-20, 23-28. ^ Carpenter, W. H. Auden, pp. 13, 23. ^ Myers, Alan; Forsythe, Robert (1999). W. H. Auden: Pennine Poet. Nenthead: North Pennines Heritage Trust. ISBN 978-0-9513535-7-8. ^ Auden, W. H. (1993). The Prolific and the Devourer. New York: Ecco. p. 10. ISBN 978-0-88001-345-1. ^ Partridge, Frank (23 February 2007). "North Pennines: Poetry in Motion". Independent.co.uk. Retrieved 2 December 2016. ^ Blamires, Harry (1983). A Guide to twentieth century literature in English. p. 130. ^ Auden, W. H. (1973). Forewords and Afterwords. New York: Random House. p. 517. ISBN 978-0-394-48359-7. ^ The Times, 5 July 1922 (Issue 43075), p. 12, col. D ^ Wright, Hugh, "Auden and Gresham's", Conference & Common Room, Vol. 44, No. 2, Summer 2007. ^ Auden, W. H. (1994). Bucknell, Katherine (ed.). Juvenilia: Poems, 1922–1928. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-03415-7. ^ Auden, W. H. (1934). Greene, Graham (ed.). The Old School: Essays by Divers Hands. London: Jonathan Cape. ^ Davenport-Hines, Richard (1995). Auden. London: Heinemann. ch. 3. ISBN 978-0-434-17507-9. ^ Auden, W. H. (1973). Forewords and Afterwords. New York: Random House. p. 69. ISBN 978-0-394-48359-7. ^ Mendelson, Edward (1999). Later Auden. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. p. 35. ISBN 978-0-374-18408-7. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p Mendelson, Edward (1981). Early Auden. New York: Viking. ISBN 978-0-670-28712-3. ^ Mitchell, Donald (1981). Britten and Auden in the Thirties: the year 1936. London: Faber and Faber]. ISBN 978-0-571-11715-4. ^ Auden, W. H. (1996). Mendelson, Edward (ed.). Prose and travel books in prose and verse, Volume I: 1926–1938. Princeton: Princeton University Press. p. 138. ISBN 978-0-691-06803-9. ^ The Good Comrade, Memoirs of Kate Mangan and Jan Kurzke, International Institute of Social History (IISH), Amsterdam. ^ Auden, W. H. (1995). Bucknell, Katherine; Jenkins, Nicholas (eds.). In Solitude, For Company: W. H. Auden after 1940, unpublished prose and recent criticism (Auden Studies 3). Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 88. ISBN 978-0-19-818294-8. ^ Lissner, Will (2 March 1956). "Poet and Judge Assist a Samaritan" (PDF). New York Times. pp. 1, 39. Retrieved 26 May 2013. ^ Mendelson, Edward (1999). Later Auden. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. p. 46. ISBN 978-0-374-18408-7. ^ Farnan, Dorothy J. (1984). Auden in Love. New York: Simon and Schuster. ISBN 978-0-671-50418-2. ^ Clark, Thekla (1995). Wystan and Chester. London: Faber & Faber. ISBN 978-0-571-17591-8. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Mendelson, Edward (1999). Later Auden. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. ISBN 978-0-374-18408-7. ^ Tippins, Sherrill (2005). February House: The Story of W. H. Auden, Carson McCullers, Jane and Paul Bowles, Benjamin Britten, and Gypsy Rose Lee, Under One Roof In Wartime America. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. ISBN 978-0-618-41911-1. ^ Pike, James A., ed. (1956). Modern Canterbury Pilgrims. New York: Morehouse-Gorham. p. 42. ^ Kirsch, Arthur (2005). Auden and Christianity. New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-10814-9. ^ Nachrichten, Salzburger. "Gedenkstätte für W. H. Auden in Kirchstetten neu gestaltet". www.salzburg.com. Retrieved 30 September 2017. ^ Shrenker, Israel (30 September 1973). "W. H. Auden Dies in Vienna". The New York Times. Retrieved 20 September 2017. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Fuller, John (1998). W. H. Auden: a commentary. London: Faber and Faber. ISBN 978-0-571-19268-7. ^ Davenport-Hines, Richard (1995). Auden. London: Heinemann. p. 137. ISBN 978-0-434-17507-9. ^ Auden, W. H. (1966). Collected Shorter Poems, 1927–1957. London: Faber and Faber. p. 15. ISBN 978-0-571-06878-4. ^ Auden, W. H. (1979). Mendelson, Edward (ed.). Selected Poems, new edition. New York: Vintage Books. xix–xx. ISBN 978-0-394-72506-2. ^ Auden, W. H. (1994). Bucknell, Katherine (ed.). Juvenilia: Poems, 1922–1928. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-03415-7. ^ Auden, W. H. (2002). Mendelson, Edward (ed.). Prose, Volume II: 1939–1948. Princeton: Princeton University Press. p. 92. ISBN 978-0-691-08935-5. ^ Carpenter, pp. 256–257. ^ Mendelson, Early Auden, pp. 257–303. ^ Auden, W. H.; Isherwood, Christopher (1988). Mendelson, Edward (ed.). Plays and other dramatic writings by W. H. Auden, 1928–1938. Princeton: Princeton University Press. xxi. ISBN 978-0-691-06740-7. ^ a b c d e f g h i Auden, W. H.; Isherwood, Christopher (1988). Mendelson, Edward (ed.). Plays and other dramatic writings by W. H. Auden, 1928–1938. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-06740-7. ^ a b c d Auden, W. H. (1996). Mendelson, Edward (ed.). Prose and travel books in prose and verse, Volume I: 1926–1938. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-06803-9. ^ a b Sharpe, Tony (21 January 2013). W. H. Auden in Context. Cambridge University Press. p. 196. ISBN 9781139618922. ^ Auden, W. H. (1973). Forewords and Afterwords. New York: Random House. p. 68. ISBN 978-0-394-48359-7. ^ a b c d e f g h Auden, W. H.; Kallman, Chester (1993). Mendelson, Edward (ed.). Libretti and other dramatic writings by W. H. Auden, 1939–1973. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-03301-3. ^ Auden, W. H. (2002). Mendelson, Edward (ed.). Prose, Volume II: 1939–1948. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-08935-5. ^ Kirsch, Arthur (2005). Auden and Christianity. New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-10814-9. ^ David Garrett Izzo (28 February 2004). W.H. Auden Encyclopedia. McFarland. p. 50. ISBN 9780786479993. ^ Smith, Stan (2004). "Introduction". In Stan Smith (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to W. H. Auden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 1–14. ISBN 978-0-521-82962-5. ^ Haffenden, p. 222. ^ Bloom, Harold (5 April 1969). "Christianity and Art". The New Republic. 160 (14): 25–28. ^ a b c d Sansom, Ian (2004). "Auden and Influence". In Smith, Stan (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to W.H. Auden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 226–39. ISBN 978-0-521-82962-5. ^ a b Brodksy, Joseph (1986). Less Than One: selected essays. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux. p. 357. ISBN 978-0-374-18503-9. ^ Haffenden, p. 83. ^ Haffenden, pp. 7–8. ^ Smith, Companion, p. 123. ^ Hynes, Samuel (1977). The Auden Generation. New York: Viking. ISBN 978-0-712-65250-6. ^ Haffenden, p. 34. ^ Haffenden, p. 29. ^ Haffenden, p. 31. ^ Jarrell, Randall (2005). Burt, Stephen (ed.). Randall Jarrell on W. H. Auden. New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-13078-3. ^ Haffenden, pp. 414–19. ^ Hoggart, Richard (1951). Auden: An Introductory Essay. London: Chatto & Windus. p. 219. ^ Beach, Joseph Warren (1957). The Making of the Auden Canon. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. ^ Spears, Monroe K. (1963). The Poetry of W.H. Auden: The Disenchanted Island. New York: Oxford University Press. p. v. ^ "Candidates for the 1963 Nobel Prize in Literature". Nobel Prize. 2013. Retrieved 3 January 2014. ^ "Candidates for the 1965 Nobel Prize in Literature". Nobel Prize. 2014. Retrieved 4 December 2016. ^ "Candidates for the 1964 Nobel Prize in Literature". Nobel Prize. 2015. Retrieved 25 May 2015. ^ "Famous People & the Abbey: Wystan Hugh Auden". Retrieved 28 July 2018. ^ "W.H. Auden". britannica.com. Retrieved 23 February 2008. ^ Haffenden, p. 54. ^ Aidan Wasley, "Auden and the American Literary World", in Sharpe, W.H. Auden in Context, pp. 118–37. ^ Wasley, Aidan (2011). The Age of Auden: Postwar Poetry and the American Scene. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-1-40083635-2. ^ Kermode, Frank, ed. (1995). The Reader's Companion to Twentieth-Century Writers. London: Fourth Estate. p. 35. ISBN 978-1-85702332-9. ^ Hensher, Philip (6 November 2009). "Love's a little boy". The Guardian. Retrieved 30 September 2015. ^ The W. H. Auden Society. "The Auden Centenary 2007". Retrieved 20 January 2007. ^ "W.H. Auden". Academy of American Poets. Retrieved 21 January 2007. ^ "Open plaques". Retrieved 22 April 2017. ^ "Open plaques". Retrieved 22 April 2017. ^ "Manhattan Sideways". Retrieved 22 April 2017. ^ "Auden's last night. Vienna museums". 14 June 2008. Retrieved 22 April 2017. ^ Yollin, Patricia (6 August 2019). "Tributes in Bronze: 8 More LGBT Heroes Join S.F.'s Rainbow Honor Walk". KQED: The California Report. Retrieved 16 August 2019. ^ ["Sommer in Kirchstetten - Gedenkstätte für W.H. Auden], NÖN 39/2015. ^ Auden, W. H. (1945). The Collected Poetry of W. H. Auden (6th ed.). New York: Random House. ISBN 978-0394403168. Retrieved 28 May 2017. ^ Auden, W. H. (2008). Mendelson, Edward (ed.). Prose, Volume III: 1949–1955. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-13326-3. ^ "National Book Awards – 1956". National Book Foundation. Retrieved 27 February 2012. (With acceptance speech by Auden and essay by Megan Snyder-Camp from the Awards 60-year anniversary blog.) ^ Auden, W. H. (2010). Mendelson, Edward (ed.). Prose, Volume IV: 1956–1962. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-14755-0. ^ Auden, W. H. (2015). Mendelson, Edward (ed.). Prose, Volume V: 1963–1968. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-151717. ^ Auden, W. H. (2015). Mendelson, Edward (ed.). Prose, Volume VI: 1969–1973. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-164588. Sources Auden, W. H.; ed. by Katherine Bucknell and Nicholas Jenkins (1990) "The Map of All My Youth": early works, friends and influences (Auden Studies 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-812964-5. Auden, W. H.; ed. by Katherine Bucknell and Nicholas Jenkins (1994). "The Language of Learning and the Language of Love": uncollected writings, new interpretations (Auden Studies 2). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-812257-8. Auden, W. H.; ed. by Katherine Bucknell and Nicholas Jenkins (1995). "In Solitude, For Company": W. H. Auden after 1940: unpublished prose and recent criticism (Auden Studies 3). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-818294-5. Carpenter, Humphrey (1981). W. H. Auden: A Biography. London: George Allen & Unwin. ISBN 0-04-928044-9. Clark, Thekla (1995). Wystan and Chester: A Personal Memoir of W. H. Auden and Chester Kallman. London: Faber and Faber. ISBN 0-571-17591-0. Davenport-Hines, Richard (1996). Auden. London: Heinemann. ISBN 0-434-17507-2. Farnan, Dorothy J. (1984). Auden in Love. New York: Simon & Schuster. ISBN 0-671-50418-5. Fuller, John (1998). W. H. Auden: A Commentary. London: Faber and Faber. ISBN 0-571-19268-8. Haffenden, John, ed. (1983). W. H. Auden: The Critical Heritage. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. ISBN 0-7100-9350-0. Kirsch, Arthur (2005). Auden and Christianity. New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN 0-300-10814-1. Mendelson, Edward (1981). Early Auden. New York: Viking. ISBN 0-670-28712-1. Mendelson, Edward (1999). Later Auden. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. ISBN 0-374-18408-9. Mendelson, Edward (2017). Early Auden, Later Auden: A Critical Biography. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-17249-1. Mitchell, Donald (1981), Britten and Auden in the Thirties: the year 1936. London: Faber and Faber. ISBN 0-571-11715-5. Myers, Alan and Forsythe, Robert (1999), W. H. Auden: Pennine Poet . Nenthead: North Pennines Heritage Trust. ISBN 0-9513535-7-8. Pamphlet with map and gazetteer. Sharpe, Tony, ed. (2013). W. H. Auden in Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-19657-4. Smith, Stan, ed. (2004). The Cambridge Companion to W. H. Auden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-53647-2. Spears, Monroe K. (1963). The Poetry of W. H. Auden: The Disenchanted Island. New York: Oxford University Press. Further reading[edit] Costello, Bonnie, and Rachel Galvin, eds. (2015). Auden at Work. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-1-137-45292-4. Spender, Stephen, ed. (1975). W. H. Auden: A Tribute. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson. ISBN 0-297-76884-0. Wright, George T. (1969; rev. ed. 1981). W. H. Auden. Boston: Twayne. ISBN 0-8057-7346-0. External links[edit] Works by or about W. H. Auden in libraries (WorldCat catalog) Works by W. H. Auden at Open Library (book publication records and links to digital talking books editions) "Archival material relating to W. H. Auden". UK National Archives. "The W. H. Auden Society". Retrieved 21 January 2007. "Fourteen poems by Auden (Academy of American Poets site)". Retrieved 20 January 2007. "W. H. Auden at Swarthmore". Retrieved 20 January 2007. W H Auden at the British Library Papers at Stuart A. Rose Manuscript, Archives, and Rare Book Library Finding aid to W.H. Auden papers at Columbia University. Rare Book & Manuscript Library. v t e W. H. Auden Books of poetry Poems (1930) The Orators (1932) On This Island (1936) Another Time (1940) The Double Man (1941) For the Time Being (1944) The Age of Anxiety (1947) Nones (1951) The Shield of Achilles (1955) Homage to Clio (1960) About the House (1966) City Without Walls (1969) Academic Graffiti (1971) Epistle to a Godson (1972) Thank You, Fog (1974) Books containing prose and verse Letters from Iceland (1937, with Louis MacNeice) Journey to a War (1939, with Christopher Isherwood) Prose works and other books The Enchafèd Flood (1950) The Dyer's Hand (1962) Secondary Worlds (1968) A Certain World (1970) Forewords and Afterwords (1973) Individual poems "The Orators" (1932) "Funeral Blues" (1936) "Spain" (1937) "Musée des Beaux Arts" (1938) "Refugee Blues" (1939) "September 1, 1939" (1939) "The Unknown Citizen" (1939) "Hymn to St. Cecilia" (1940) "For the Time Being" (1944) "The Sea and the Mirror" (1944) "The Age of Anxiety" (1947) "In Praise of Limestone" (1948) "The Platonic Blow" "Horae Canonicae" (1949–55) "Bucolics" (1952–53) "The Shield of Achilles" (1955) Plays Paid on Both Sides (1928) The Dance of Death (1933) The Dog Beneath the Skin (1935) The Ascent of F6 (1936) On the Frontier (1938) The Play of Daniel (1958) Libretti Paul Bunyan (1941) The Rake's Progress (1951) Elegy for Young Lovers (1961) The Bassarids (1966) Love's Labour's Lost (1973) Screenwriting Night Mail (1936) Family George Augustus Auden (father) John Bicknell Auden (brother) Chester Kallman (companion) Related W. H. Auden bibliography Links to related articles v t e Pulitzer Prize for Poetry (1922–1950) Edwin Arlington Robinson (1922) Edna St. Vincent Millay (1923) Robert Frost (1924) Edwin Arlington Robinson (1925) Amy Lowell (1926) Leonora Speyer (1927) Edwin Arlington Robinson (1928) Stephen Vincent Benét (1929) Conrad Aiken (1930) Robert Frost (1931) George Dillon (1932) Archibald MacLeish (1933) Robert Hillyer (1934) Audrey Wurdemann (1935) Robert P. T. Coffin (1936) Robert Frost (1937) Marya Zaturenska (1938) John Gould Fletcher (1939) Mark Van Doren (1940) Leonard Bacon (1941) William Rose Benét (1942) Robert Frost (1943) Stephen Vincent Benét (1944) Karl Shapiro (1945) Robert Lowell (1947) W. H. Auden (1948) Peter Viereck (1949) Gwendolyn Brooks (1950) Complete list (1922–1950) (1951–1975) (1976–2000) (2001–2025) v t e Recipients of the Austrian State Prize for European Literature Zbigniew Herbert (1965) W. H. Auden (1966) Vasko Popa (1967) Václav Havel (1968) Not given (1969) Eugène Ionesco (1970) Peter Huchel (1971) Sławomir Mrożek (1972) Harold Pinter (1973) Sándor Weöres (1974) Miroslav Krleža (1975) Italo Calvino (1976) Pavel Kohout (1977) Fulvio Tomizza (1977) Simone de Beauvoir (1978) Fulvio Tomizza (1979) Sarah Kirsch (1980) Doris Lessing (1981) Tadeusz Różewicz (1982) Friedrich Dürrenmatt (1983) Christa Wolf (1984) Stanisław Lem (1985) Giorgio Manganelli (1986) Milan Kundera (1987) Andrzej Szczypiorski (1988) Marguerite Duras (1989) Helmut Heissenbüttel (1990) Péter Nádas (1991) Salman Rushdie (1992) Chinghiz Aitmatov (1993) Inger Christensen (1994) Aleksandar Tišma (1995) Jürg Laederach (1996) Antonio Tabucchi (1997) Dubravka Ugrešić (1998) Péter Esterházy (1999) António Lobo Antunes (2000) Umberto Eco (2001) Christoph Hein (2002) Cees Nooteboom (2003) Julian Barnes (2004) Claudio Magris (2005) Jorge Semprún (2006) A. L. Kennedy (2007) Agota Kristof (2008) Per Olov Enquist (2009) Paul Nizon (2010) Javier Marías (2011) Patrick Modiano (2012) John Banville (2013) Lyudmila Ulitskaya (2014) Mircea Cărtărescu (2015) Andrzej Stasiuk (2016) Karl Ove Knausgård (2017) Zadie Smith (2018) Michel Houellebecq (2019) Drago Jančar (2020) v t e Laureates of the Struga Poetry Evenings Golden Wreath Robert Rozhdestvensky (1966) Bulat Okudzhava (1967) László Nagy (1968) Mak Dizdar (1969) Miodrag Pavlović (1970) W. H. Auden (1971) Pablo Neruda (1972) Eugenio Montale (1973) Fazıl Hüsnü Dağlarca (1974) Léopold Sédar Senghor (1975) Eugène Guillevic (1976) Artur Lundkvist (1977) Rafael Alberti (1978) Miroslav Krleža (1979) Hans Magnus Enzensberger (1980) Blaže Koneski (1981) Nichita Stănescu (1982) Sachchidananda Vatsyayan 'Ajneya' (1983) Andrei Voznesensky (1984) Yiannis Ritsos (1985) Allen Ginsberg (1986) Tadeusz Różewicz (1987) Desanka Maksimović (1988) Thomas Shapcott (1989) Justo Jorge Padrón (1990) Joseph Brodsky (1991) Ferenc Juhász (1992) Gennadiy Aygi (1993) Ted Hughes (1994) Yehuda Amichai (1995) Makoto Ooka (1996) Adunis (1997) Liu Banjiu (1998) Yves Bonnefoy (1999) Edoardo Sanguineti (2000) Seamus Heaney (2001) Slavko Mihalić (2002) Tomas Tranströmer (2003) Vasco Graça Moura (2004) William S. Merwin (2005) Nancy Morejón (2006) Mahmoud Darwish (2007) Fatos Arapi (2008) Tomaž Šalamun (2009) Lyubomir Levchev (2010) Mateja Matevski (2011) Mongane Wally Serote (2012) José Emilio Pacheco (2013) Ko Un (2014) Bei Dao (2015) Margaret Atwood (2016) Charles Simic (2017) Adam Zagajewski (2018) Ana Blandiana (2019) Portals Access related topics Biography portal Poetry portal Find out more on Wikipedia's Sister projects Media from Commons Quotations from Wikiquote Source texts from Wikisource Data from Wikidata Authority control BIBSYS: 90087541 BNE: XX1164379 BNF: cb11889466j (data) CANTIC: a10455024 CiNii: DA00250711 GND: 118650963 ICCU: IT\ICCU\BVEV\002606 ISNI: 0000 0001 2117 7938 LCCN: n79054316 LNB: 000020507 MBA: 5bfc7072-8a01-4364-a436-415fe4aeb830 NARA: 10580978 NDL: 00431892 NKC: jn19990000305 NLA: 36124331 NLG: 105278 NLI: 000013057 NLK: KAC199601173 NSK: 000034071 NTA: 068481896 RSL: 000080286 SELIBR: 231996 SNAC: w6p55kjv SUDOC: 026695502 Trove: 1216158 ULAN: 500372764 VcBA: 495/17455 VIAF: 2465832 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n79054316 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=W._H._Auden&oldid=995961147" Categories: 1907 births 1973 deaths 20th-century American dramatists and playwrights 20th-century American male writers 20th-century American poets 20th-century British dramatists and playwrights 20th-century British male writers 20th-century British poets 20th-century English poets Alumni of Christ Church, Oxford American male poets Anglican poets Anthologists Benjamin Britten Bollingen Prize recipients British male poets British people of the Spanish Civil War English dramatists and playwrights English emigrants to the United States English literary critics English male dramatists and playwrights English male poets English opera librettists Formalist poets Gay academics Gay writers LGBT Anglicans LGBT dramatists and playwrights LGBT poets LGBT writers from England Members of the American Academy of Arts and Letters Modernist poets Modernist theatre National Book Award winners Naturalized citizens of the United States Oxford Professors of Poetry People educated at Gresham's School People educated at St Edmund's School, Hindhead People from Brooklyn Heights People from York Pulitzer Prize for Poetry winners Struga Poetry Evenings Golden Wreath laureates Translators of Johann Wolfgang von Goethe Translators of the Poetic Edda University of Michigan faculty Hidden categories: Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the ODNB Pages containing links to subscription-or-libraries content Articles with short description Short description matches Wikidata Use British English from October 2013 Use dmy dates from January 2019 Articles with hCards Articles with Open Library links Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CANTIC identifiers Wikipedia articles with CINII identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ICCU identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with LNB identifiers Wikipedia articles with MusicBrainz identifiers Wikipedia articles with NARA identifiers Wikipedia articles with NDL identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLG identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLI identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NSK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with RSL identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SNAC-ID identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with Trove identifiers Wikipedia articles with ULAN identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers AC with 28 elements Good articles Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikiquote Wikisource Languages Afrikaans العربية Asturianu বাংলা Беларуская Български Bosanski Català Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français Frysk Galego 한국어 Հայերեն हिन्दी Hrvatski Ido Bahasa Indonesia Íslenska Italiano עברית Kiswahili Latina Latviešu Magyar Македонски Malagasy मराठी مصرى Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Norsk nynorsk ਪੰਜਾਬੀ Polski Português Română Русский Scots Simple English Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Tagalog தமிழ் ไทย Türkçe Українська Tiếng Việt 吴语 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 23 December 2020, at 20:11 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1074 ---- Book sources - Wikipedia Book sources Jump to navigation Jump to search This page allows users to search for multiple sources for a book given the 10- or 13-digit ISBN number. Spaces and dashes in the ISBN number do not matter. Search for book sourcesISBN: Search Wikimedia page containing links to catalogs of libraries, booksellers, and other book sources For assistance, see Help:ISBN. This page links to catalogs of libraries, booksellers, and other book sources where you will be able to search for the book by its International Standard Book Number (ISBN). If you arrived at this page by clicking an ISBN link in a Wikipedia page, you will find the full range of relevant search links for that specific book by scrolling to the find links below. To search for a different book, type that book's individual ISBN into this ISBN search box. Spaces and dashes in the ISBN do not matter. Also, the number starts after the colon for "ISBN-10:" and "ISBN-13:" numbers.  An ISBN identifies a specific edition of a book. Any given title may therefore have a number of different ISBNs. See xISBN below for finding other editions. An ISBN registration, even one corresponding to a book page on a major book distributor database, is not definite proof that such a book actually exists. A title may have been cancelled or postponed after the ISBN was assigned. Check to see if the book exists or not. The master copy of this page is located at Wikipedia:Book sources. Contents 1 Online text 2 Online databases 3 Subscription eBook databases 4 Libraries 4.1 Worldwide 4.2 Africa 4.2.1 Nigeria 4.2.2 South Africa 4.2.3 Zimbabwe 4.3 Central America and the Caribbean 4.3.1 Barbados 4.3.2 Guatemala 4.3.3 Jamaica 4.3.4 Mexico 4.3.5 Trinidad and Tobago 4.4 Canada 4.4.1 Public libraries 4.4.2 Universities and colleges 4.5 United States 4.5.1 Public libraries by state 4.5.2 Universities and colleges 4.6 South America 4.6.1 Argentina 4.6.2 Brazil 4.6.3 Colombia 4.6.4 Ecuador 4.7 Asia 4.7.1 Bangladesh 4.7.2 China, People's Republic 4.7.3 Hong Kong, S.A.R. of China 4.7.4 India 4.7.5 Indonesia 4.7.6 Iran 4.7.7 Israel 4.7.8 Japan 4.7.9 Korea 4.7.10 Malaysia 4.7.11 Philippines 4.7.11.1 Universities and colleges 4.7.11.2 Other libraries 4.7.12 Singapore 4.7.13 Taiwan, Republic of China 4.7.14 Thailand 4.8 Australasia and Oceania 4.8.1 Australia 4.8.1.1 Public libraries 4.8.1.2 Academic libraries 4.8.2 New Zealand 4.8.2.1 Public libraries 4.8.2.2 Academic libraries 4.9 Europe 4.9.1 Austria 4.9.2 Belgium 4.9.3 Bosnia and Herzegovina 4.9.4 Croatia 4.9.5 Czech Republic 4.9.6 Denmark 4.9.7 Estonia 4.9.8 Finland 4.9.9 France 4.9.10 Germany 4.9.11 Greece 4.9.12 Hungary 4.9.13 Iceland 4.9.14 Ireland 4.9.15 Italy 4.9.16 Luxembourg 4.9.17 Montenegro 4.9.18 Netherlands 4.9.19 Norway 4.9.20 Poland 4.9.21 Portugal 4.9.22 Russia 4.9.23 Serbia 4.9.24 Slovenia 4.9.25 Spain 4.9.26 Sweden 4.9.27 Switzerland 4.9.28 Turkey 4.9.29 United Kingdom 4.9.29.1 Public libraries 4.9.29.2 Universities 5 Bookselling and swapping 5.1 Price comparison sites 5.2 Search many booksellers 5.3 Individual booksellers 5.4 Book-swapping websites 6 Non-English book sources 7 Bibliographical information 8 Find other editions 9 Find on Wikipedia 10 See also Online text Find this book on Google Books Find this book at the Open Library Find this book on Amazon.com (or .au, .br, .ca, .cn, .de, .es, .fr, .in, .it, .jp, .mx, .nl, .uk). Google Books and Amazon.com may be particularly helpful if you want to verify citations in Wikipedia articles, because they often enable you to search an online version of the book for specific words or phrases, or you can browse through the book (although for copyright reasons the entire book is usually not available). Online databases Find this book at Karlsruhe Virtual Catalog, a metasearch engine addressing many of the databases linked here and also some major commercial booksellers. Find this book at WorldCat free online catalog of the world's libraries Find this book at OttoBib.com citation metasearch Find this book at Copyright Clearance Center online rights database Find this book at Goodreads personal library catalog Find this book at LibraryThing personal library catalog Find this book at aNobii personal library catalog Find this book at iDreamBooks book review aggregator Find this book at the Grand Comics Database Find this book at the Internet Speculative Fiction Database Subscription eBook databases Find this book at Alexander Street Press by ProQuest Find this book at eBookCentral by ProQuest Find this book at EBSCO Industries eBooks Find this book at Gale by Cengage Find this book at HathiTrust Find this book at Overdrive by Rakuten Find this book at Project MUSE Find this book at ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Open Find this book at Safari Books Online by O'Reilly Media Find this book at ScienceDirect Libraries Select your region from the map above Worldwide Find this book at your local library through WorldCat Africa Nigeria Find this book on the Ahmadu Bello University Library catalogue Find this book on the University of Ilorin Library catalogue South Africa Find this book on the National Library of South Africa catalogue Find this book on the SEALS Consortium catalogue Find this book on the University of South Africa catalogue Find this book on the University of the Witwatersrand Library catalogue Zimbabwe Find this book on the University of Zimbabwe Library catalogue Central America and the Caribbean Barbados Find this book in the University of the West Indies (Cave Hill campus) Library catalogue Guatemala Find this book in the University of San Carlos of Guatemala Central Library catalogue Jamaica Find this book in the University of the West Indies (Mona campus) Library catalogue Mexico Find this book in the National Autonomous University of Mexico Library System Trinidad and Tobago Find this book in the University of Trinidad and Tobago Library Canada Find this book in the Canadian union catalogue via Library and Archives Canada Find this book in the Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec catalogue Find this book in the NRC Canada Institute for Scientific and Technical Information (CISTI) catalogue (Canada's National Science Library) Public libraries Find this book in the Barrie Public Library catalogue Find this book in the Burnaby Public Library catalogue Find this book in the Calgary Public Library catalogue Find this book in the Edmonton Public Library catalogue Find this book in the Gatineau Public Library catalogue Find this book in the Hamilton Public Library catalogue Find this book in the Halifax Public Library catalogue Find this book in the Kitchener Public Library catalogue Find this book in the London Public Library catalogue Find this book in the Markham Public Library catalogue Find this book in the Mississauga Library System catalogue Find this book in the Moncton Public Library catalogue Find this book in the Montreal Public Libraries Network catalogue Find this book in the New Brunswick Public Library Service catalogue Find this book in the Ottawa Public Library catalogue Find this book in the Saskatchewan Information and Library Services Consortium catalogue Find this book in the Stratford Public Library catalogue Find this book in the Sudbury Public Library catalogue Find this book in the Surrey Public Library catalogue Find this book in the Thunder Bay Public Library catalogue Find this book in the Toronto Public Library catalogue Find this book in the Waterloo Public Library catalogue Find this book in the Winnipeg Public Library catalogue Find this book in the Vancouver Public Library catalogue Find this book in the West Vancouver Memorial Library catalogue Universities and colleges Find this book in the Carleton University catalogue Find this book in the Concordia University Library Find this book in the McGill University library Find this book in the McMaster University catalogue Find this book in the Novanet catalogue for all universities in Nova Scotia Find this book in the Queen's University Library catalogue Find this book in the Ryerson University Library Find this book in the Simon Fraser University Library Find this book in the Sherbrooke University catalogue Find this book in the University of Guelph library catalogue Find this book in the Trinity Western University Library catalogue Find this book in the York University Libraries catalogue Find this book in the University College of the Fraser Valley Library Find this book in the University of Alberta Libraries catalogue Find this book in the University of British Columbia Library catalogue Find this book in the University of Calgary Library Find this book in the University of Manitoba catalogue Find this book in the University of New Brunswick catalogue Find this book in the University of Ottawa catalogue Find this book in the University of Prince Edward Island catalogue Find this book in the University of Saskatchewan catalogue Find this book in the University of Toronto Library Find this book in the University of Western Ontario catalogue Find this book in the University of Windsor Library Catalogue Find this book in the University of Winnipeg Library United States Find this book on the United States Library of Congress catalog Find this book in the National Agricultural Library catalog Find this book in the National Library of Medicine catalog Public libraries by state Alabama Find this book in the Jefferson County Library Cooperative (Jefferson County, Alabama) public libraries catalog California Find this book in the Alameda County, California Public Library catalog Find this book in the California & Nevada LINK+ Inter-library Loan catalog Find this book in the Contra Costa County, California Library catalog Find this book in the MARINet catalog, a shared catalog for all the public libraries in Marin County, California Find this book in the Monterey Public Library catalog (Monterey, California) Find this book in the Mountain View Public Library catalog (Mountain View, California) Find this book in the Oakland Public Library catalog (in California) Find this book in the Pacific Grove Public Library catalog (Pacific Grove, California) Find this book in the Palo Alto City Library catalog (Palo Alto, California) Find this book in the California Peninsula Library System catalog Find this book in the Los Angeles (California) Public Library databases and indexes Find this book in the Sacramento Public Library system catalog Find this book in the San Diego County Library (California) catalog Find this book in the San Diego Public Library catalog Find this book in the San Francisco Public Library (California) catalog Find this book in the San Joaquin Valley Library System, catalog (using the Fresno County, California profile) Find this book in the joint San José Public Library and San José State University (California) Library catalog Find this book in the Santa Clara City Library catalog (Santa Clara, California) Find this book in the Santa Clara County Library catalog (Santa Clara County, California) Find this book in the Solano, Napa and Partners Library Consortium catalog (Solano County, California, Napa County, California) Colorado Find this book in the Boulder Public Library (Colorado) catalog Find this book in the Denver Public Library (Colorado) catalog Find this book in the Jefferson County, Colorado public library catalog Find this book in the Prospector (Colorado and Wyoming public, academic, and special libraries) Delaware Find this book in the Delaware Library Catalog Florida Find this book in the Jacksonville, Florida Public Library catalog Find this book in the Orange County, Florida public library Find this book in the Pinellas Public Library Cooperative catalog, Pinellas County Georgia Find this book in the PINES Statewide Public Library catalog Indiana Find this book in the Indianapolis-Marion County Public Library (Indiana) Find this book in the Tippecanoe County Public Library library catalog Iowa Find this book in the Des Moines, Iowa Public Library catalog Find this book in the Sioux City, Iowa Public Library catalog Kansas Find this book in the Johnson County, Kansas Public Library catalog Kentucky Find this book in the Louisville Free Public Library catalog Massachusetts Find this book in the Boston Public Library (BPL) catalog Find this book in the Cape Libraries Automated Materials Sharing (CLAMS) catalog Find this book in the C/W MARS catalog (Central or Western Massachusetts) Find this book in the Minuteman Library Network (MLN) catalog (in Eastern Massachusetts) Find this book in the Merrimack Valley Library Consortium (MVLC) catalog Find this book in the North of Boston Library Exchange (NOBLE) catalog (in Northeastern Massachusetts) Find this book in the Old Colony Library Network catalog (in the South Shore) Find this book in the Sails Library Network catalog (in Southeastern Massachusetts) Michigan Find this book in the Michigan eLibrary aggregate catalog Minnesota Find this book in the Hennepin County Library (including Minneapolis, Minnesota) catalog Missouri Find this book in the Kansas City, Missouri Public Library Find this book in the St. Louis Public Library system catalog Find this book in the St. Louis County Library system catalog Nebraska Find this book in the Omaha Public Library catalog in Omaha, Nebraska New Jersey Find this book in the Bergen County Cooperative Library System for Bergen, Hudson, Passaic, and Essex counties Find this book in the Hunterdon County Library system, Hunterdon County, New Jersey Find this book in the Monmouth County Library System (New Jersey) Find this book in the Somerset County, New Jersey public library catalog New Mexico Find this book in the Los Alamos County, New Mexico public library catalog New York Find this book in the Brooklyn Public Library catalog Find this book in the Finger Lakes Library System catalog in Central New York Find this book in the Four County Library System catalog (Broome, Chenango, Delaware, and Otsego Counties, including Binghamton) Find this book in the Mid-Hudson Library System (New York) catalog Find this book in the Mohawk Valley and Southern Adirondack Library Systems (New York) catalog (using the Saratoga Springs Public Library profile) Find this book in the Nassau County Library System catalog Find this book in the New York Public Library catalog Find this book in the Suffolk County Library System catalog Find this book in the Tompkins County Public Library catalog in Ithaca, New York North Carolina Find this book in the Forsyth County Public Library catalog Find this book in the Wake County Public Library catalog Ohio Find this book in the Cleveland Public Library catalog Find this book in the Cuyahoga County Public Library catalog Find this book in the Dayton Metro Library catalog Find this book in the Toledo-Lucas County Public Library catalog Oklahoma Find this book in the Tulsa City-County Library catalog Oregon Find this book in the Eugene, Oregon Public Library catalog Find this book in the Multnomah County, Oregon Library catalog Find this book in the WCCLS in Washington County, Oregon Pennsylvania Find this book in the Pennsylvania library system Find this book in the Carnegie Library of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania Rhode Island Find this book in the Rhode Island Ocean State Libraries Catalog South Carolina Find this book in the Richland County, South Carolina Public Library (Columbia, South Carolina) system catalog South Dakota Find this book in the Alexander Mitchell Public Library catalog (Aberdeen, South Dakota) Tennessee Find this book in the Nashville, Tennessee Public Library Catalog Texas Find this book in the Amon Carter Museum of American Art Research Library Catalog (Fort Worth, Texas) Find this book in the Harris County (Texas) Public Library catalog Find this book in the Richardson, Texas, Public Library Find this book in the Round Rock, Texas Public Library Find this book in the San Antonio Public Library (Texas) Utah Find this book in the Salt Lake City Public Library system Find this book in the Weber County Library System, Weber County, Utah Washington state Find this book in the Fort Vancouver Regional Libraries catalog Find this book in the King County Library System Find this book in the Pierce County Library System Find this book in the Seattle Public Library Find this book in the Sno-Isle Libraries catalog Find this book in the Tacoma Public Library Wisconsin Find this book in the Marathon County Public Library (MCPL) Catalog (V-Cat) Find this book in the Milwaukee County Federated Library System catalog (Wisconsin) Find this book in the South Central Library System catalog (south central Wisconsin) Universities and colleges Find this book in the American University/Washington Regional Library Consortium library catalog Find this book in the Arizona State University library catalog Find this book in the Auburn University library catalog Find this book in the Bowdoin College library catalog Find this book in the Bowling Green State University library catalog Find this book in the Brigham Young University library catalog Find this book in the Brown University library catalog Find this book in the Chapman University library catalog Find this book in the Christopher Newport University library Find this book in the Clemson University Libraries Find this book in the College of Southern Nevada library catalog Find this book in the Colorado State University libraries catalog Find this book in the Columbia University libraries catalog Find this book in the Concordia College (Minnesota) library catalog Find this book in the ConnectNY (18 New York State academic libraries) catalog Find this book in the CONSORT Colleges (Denison University, Kenyon College, Ohio Wesleyan University, and College of Wooster) libraries Find this book in the Cooperating Libraries in Consortium CLICnet catalog Find this book in the Cornell University Library catalog Find this book in the Dartmouth College Library catalog Find this book in the Drexel University Library catalog Find this book in the Duke University library catalog (Also see 'Triangle Research Library Network,' below.) Find this book in the George Mason University library catalog Find this book in the Georgia Tech Library catalog Find this book in the Gettysburg College library catalog Find this book in the Grinnell College library catalog Find this book in the Harvard University library system, HOLLIS. Find this book in the Hendrix College library catalog Find this book in the Indiana University library system, IUCAT Find this book in the Kansas State University library catalog Find this book in the Linn-Benton Community College library catalog Find this book in the Le Moyne College library catalog Find this book in the Massachusetts Institute of Technology catalog, Barton Find this book in Missouri's MOBIUS catalog of more than 70 academic, public, and special libraries Find this book in the MnPALS Library Union catalog (a system of 154 university libraries in MN) Find this book in the North Carolina State University Library catalog Find this book in the Oberlin College library catalog Find this book in the OhioLINK Union Catalog of 85 Ohio public and private academic libraries Find this book in the Ohio State University Library catalog Find this book in the Old Dominion University Library catalog Find this book in the Pepperdine University libraries catalog Find this book in the Portland Community College library catalog Find this book in the Princeton University Library Find this book in the Prospector (Colorado and Wyoming public, academic, and special libraries) Find this book in the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute library catalog Find this book in the Helin Library Catalog (Rhode Island Colleges and Universities) Find this book in the Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT) library catalog Find this book in the San Diego State University library catalog Find this book in the San Jose State University library catalog Find this book in the Southern Methodist University library catalog Find this book in the Stanford University library catalog Find this book in the State University of New York library catalog (all SUNY campus libraries) Find this book in the Syracuse University library catalog Find this book in the Temple University library catalog Find this book in the Texas A&M University General Libraries catalog Find this book in the Texas A&M University Medical Sciences Library catalog Find this book on the Triangle Research Library Network (Duke University, North Carolina State University, and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill libraries) Find this book in the University of Arizona library catalog Find this book in the University of Arkansas library catalog Find this book in the University of Arkansas at Little Rock library catalog Find this book in the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences library catalog Find this book in the University of Central Arkansas library catalog Find this book in the University of Colorado at Boulder library catalog Find this book in the University of Chicago library catalog Find this book in the University of Delaware library catalog Find this book in the University of Florida library catalog Find this book in the University of Houston library catalog Find this book in the University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign library catalog Find this book in the University of Iowa library catalog Find this book in the University of Louisville library catalog Find this book in the University of Maine library catalog, URSUS Find this book in the University of Maryland, College Park library catalog Find this book in the University of Miami, Florida library catalog Find this book in the University of Michigan (Ann Arbor and Flint campuses) library catalog, MIRLYN Find this book in the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill library catalog Find this book in the University of Notre Dame library catalog Find this book in the University of Pennsylvania library catalog, Franklin Find this book in the University of Pittsburgh library catalog, PITTCAT Find this book in the University of Texas at Austin library catalog Find this book in the University of Washington library catalog Find this book in the University of Wisconsin-Madison library catalog Find this book in the Vassar College library catalog Find this book in the Washington University in St. Louis library system Find this book in the Weber State University library catalog Find this book in the West Virginia University catalog Find this book in the Williams College library catalog Find this book in the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University library catalog, Addison Find this book in the Yale University library catalog South America Argentina Find this book in the Universidad de San Andrés library Find this book in the Instituto Argentino de Radioastronomía library Brazil Find this book in the National Library of Brazil Find this book in the University of São Paulo library system Find this book in the Universidade Estadual de Campinas library system Find this book in the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul library system Colombia Find this book in the National University of Colombia library Find this book in the University of Los Andes library Find this book in the Pontifical Xavierian University library Ecuador Find this book in the National Library of Ecuador (Biblioteca Nacional Eugenio Espejo) Library catalogue Asia Bangladesh Find this book in the Bangladesh Parliament Library catalogue. Find this book in Independent University, Bangladesh Library catalogue. Find this book in Khulna University of Engineering & Technology Central Library catalogue China, People's Republic Find this book in National Library of China Find this book in Nanjing Library Find this book in Tsinghua University Library Find this book in South China Agricultural University Library Hong Kong, S.A.R. of China Find this book among libraries of universities in Hong Kong on the Hong Kong Academic Library Link Find this book in Hong Kong Public Library Catalogue Find this book in Vocational Training Council libraries India Find this book in British Council Library Find this book in the Delhi Public Library catalogue Find this book on Flipkart Find this book on Infibeam Find this book on Rediff Find this book in the Vikram Sarabhai Library, IIM Ahmedabad catalogue Find this book in the North-Eastern Hill University Library catalogue Indonesia Find this book in the National Library of Indonesia Iran Find this book on National Library and Archives Organization of Iran Find this book on Amirkabir University of Technology Central library Israel Find this book in the MALMAD Israel Union List Japan Find this book on the National Diet Library Find this book on the CiNii Books Find this book on the Webcat Plus Korea Find this book on the National Library of Korea Find this book on the Naver Book Malaysia Find this book on the Asia Pacific University of Technology and Innovation library catalogue Find this book on the HELP University library catalogue Find this book on the UCSI University library catalogue Find this book on the University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus Philippines Find this book in the Philippine eLibrary catalogue (integrated catalogue of the National Library of the Philippines, the Commission on Higher Education, the Department of Agriculture, the Department of Science and Technology and the University of the Philippines) Universities and colleges Find this book in the Ateneo de Manila University Library catalogue Find this book in the De La Salle University catalogue Find this book in the Polytechnic University of the Philippines Library catalogue Find this book in the University of Asia and the Pacific catalogue Find this book in the University of the Philippines Diliman catalogue Find this book in the University of the Philippines Manila catalogue Find this book in the University of San Carlos catalogue Find this book in the University of Santo Tomas Library catalogue Other libraries Find this book in the Filipinas Heritage Library catalogue Find this book in the LibraryLink catalogue Find this book in the Quezon City Public Library catalogue Singapore Find this book on the National University of Singapore library catalogue Taiwan, Republic of China Find this book on the National Bibliographic Information Network catalogue Find this book at Books.com.tw website Thailand Find this book on the Chulalongkorn University library catalogue Australasia and Oceania Australia Find this book on the National Library of Australia catalogue Find this book on the State Library of New South Wales library system catalogue Find this book on the State Library of Victoria library system catalogue Find this book on the State Library of Queensland library system catalogue Find this book on the State Library of South Australia catalogue Find this book on the State Library of Western Australia catalogue (includes local branches) Public libraries Find this book (and library resources in other formats) at your local library through the National Library of Australia's "Trove" service Find this book (and library resources in other formats) at your local library through Libraries Australia (subscribers only) Find this book on the Australian Capital Territory Public Library catalogue Find this book on the Geelong Public Library catalogue Find this book among members of the Northern Territory Libraries Network Find this book on the South Australian Public Libraries catalogue Academic libraries Find this book on the Federation University Australia catalogue Find this book on the Australian National University library system catalogue Find this book on the Central Queensland University library catalogue Find this book on the Charles Sturt University library catalogue Find this book on the Deakin University/Gordon Institute of TAFE library catalogue Find this book on the James Cook University (Qld) library catalogue Find this book on the Monash University library system catalogue Find this book on the Queensland University of Technology library catalogue Find this book on the University of Adelaide catalogue Find this book on the University of Melbourne/Victorian College of the Arts library system catalogue Find this book on the University of Newcastle (NSW) library catalogue Find this book on the University of Queensland library catalogue Find this book on the University of Sydney library catalogue Find this book on the University of Technology, Sydney library catalogue Find this book on the University of Wollongong catalogue Find this book (and other library resources) on the Wesley College, Melbourne (AquaBrowser) library catalogue New Zealand Find this book in the National Library of New Zealand catalogue Find which New Zealand Libraries have this book Public libraries Find this book in the Auckland Libraries catalogue Find this book in the Christchurch Public Libraries catalogue Find this book in the Dunedin Public Libraries catalogue Find this book in the Palmerston North City Public Library catalogue Find this book in the Waimakariri District Libraries catalogue Academic libraries Find this book in the Auckland University of Technology library catalogue Find this book in the Lincoln University library catalogue Find this book in the Massey University library catalogue Find this book in the University of Canterbury and Christchurch College of Education library catalogue Find this book in the University of Waikato library catalogue Europe (see also The European Library) Find this book at the Karlsruher Virtueller Katalog, a European cross-library search engine Austria Find this book on the Graz University of Technology library catalogue Find this book on the Technical University of Vienna library catalogue Find this book on the University of Innsbruck library catalogue Find this book on the University of Salzburg library catalogue Find this book on the University of Vienna library catalogue Belgium Find this book (en) in UniCat Belgica, Union Catalogue of Belgian Libraries Find this book (nl) in Bibliotheek.be, the portal and catalogue of public libraries in Flanders Find this book (fr) in the Université libre de Bruxelles library catalog Find this book (nl) in the Vrije Universiteit Brussel library catalog Bosnia and Herzegovina Find this book at the Bosnian-Herzegovinian Co-operative Online Bibliographic System & Services Croatia Find this book in the Croatian National and University Library catalogue Find this book in the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Library catalogue Czech Republic Find this book in the State Technical Library in Prague Find this book in the Palacký University Library in Olomouc Find this book in the State Technical Library in Prague Find this book in the Masaryk University libraries in Brno Find this book in the Palacký University Library in Olomouc Find this book in the Res­earch Library in Olomouc Denmark Find this book with bibliotek.dk Estonia Find this book on Ester, the catalogue of ELNET Ester libraries Finland (also see Searching catalogues of Finnish libraries) Find this book on HelMet, the Greater Helsinki region library catalogue Find this book on the Helsinki University of Technology library catalogue Find this book on the Helsinki School of Economics library catalogue Find this book in Piki, the catalogue for public libraries in the Pirkanmaa region, e.g. Tampere City Library Find this book on the Tampere University of Technology library catalogue Find this book on the University of Helsinki library catalogue Find this book on the University of Jyväskylä library catalogue Find this book on the University of Tampere library catalogue Find this book on the University of Turku library database Find this book on the Vaasa City Library – Regional Library Find this book and compare prices with Vertaa.fi France Find this book in the Catalogue général de la Bibliothèque nationale de France, the French national library SUDOC, French academic libraries Bu Angers Catalogue de la Bibliothèque universitaire d'Angers Germany Find this book in the DNB – Deutsche Nationalbibliothek, central archival library and national bibliographic centre Find this book in the GVK – Gemeinsamer Verbundkatalog, a joint effort of multiple states in northern and eastern Germany Find this book in the hbz-Verbundkatalog Find this book in the SWB Online-Katalog Find this book in the BVB BibliotheksVerbund Bayern Find this book in the KOBV-Portal Find this book in the HeBIS-Verbundkatalog Greece Find this book in any Greek Academic Library through Zephyr Find this book in the library of National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Hungary Find this book in Libri Könyvkereső Iceland Find this book in Gegnir, the union catalog of Icelandic libraries Ireland Find this book in the Dublin City Council Library Find this book in the Dublin City University (DCU) Library Find this book in the Dublin Institute of Technology Library Find this book in the National University of Ireland, Galway (NUI, Galway) Library Find this book in the Trinity College of Dublin (TCD) Library Find this book in the South Dublin County Council Library Find this book in the University College Cork (UCC) Boole Library Find this book in the University College Dublin (UCD) Library Italy Find this book in the National Library System Catalogue, which searches simultaneously in hundreds of Italian libraries (including national libraries, university libraries, municipal libraries) Find this book in the University of Florence Library Find this book in the University of Pavia Library Find this book in the University of Pisa Library Find this book in the Pontifical University of the Holy Cross Library Find this book in the Polytechnic University of Turin Library Luxembourg Find this book in bibnet.lu, the unified catalogue for libraries in Luxembourg Montenegro Find this book at the Montenegrin Co-operative Online Bibliographic System & Services Netherlands Find this book in the Dutch-Union Catalogue that searches simultaneously in more than 400 Dutch electronic library systems (including regional libraries, university libraries, research libraries and the Royal Dutch library) Find this book in the Koninklijke Bibliotheek (National Library of the Netherlands) Find this book in Leiden University Libraries Find this book in Maastricht University Library Find this book in Radboud University Nijmegen Library Find this book in University of Groningen Library Find this book in Utrecht University Library Norway Find this book in the Norwegian Bibsys system, that comprises all Norwegian university libraries, the National Library, all college libraries, and a number of research libraries Find this book in the Norwegian union catalogue of monographs (Sambok) Find this book in the Stavanger Public Library catalogue Poland Find this book at the National Library in Warsaw Portugal Find this book in the catalog of PORBASE (National Bibliographic Database of Portuguese libraries), or get its record, from the URN.PORBASE.org service, in the MarcXchange format. Both services are managed by the National Library of Portugal and the catalog includes records from public and private libraries in Portugal. Russia Find this book in the catalog of National Electronic Library (НЭБ, Национальная электронная библиотека). Serbia Find this book at the Serbian Co-operative Online Bibliographic System & Services Slovenia Find this book at the Slovenian Co-operative Online Bibliographic System & Services Spain Find this book at the Catalan universities catalogue Find this book at the University of Córdoba library catalogue Find this book at the University of Granada library catalogue Find this book at the University of Leon library catalogue Find this book at the University of Navarra library catalogue Find this book at the University of Salamanca library catalogue Find this book at the University of Seville library catalogue Sweden Find this book in the Swedish Royal Library national catalogue (LIBRIS) Find this book in the Chalmers University of Technology library catalogue Find this book at the Gothenburg Public Library library catalogue Find this book at the Malmö City Library library catalogue Switzerland Find this book in Helveticat, the catalogue of the Swiss National Library Find this book in the Swiss Virtual Catalogue (CHVK) Find this book in the RERO catalogue collectif Find this book in the Nebis catalogue Find this book in the Sistema Bibliotecario Ticinese catalogue Turkey Find this book in the National Catalog Find this book in the Bogazici University Library catalogue Find this book in the Ege University Library catalogue Find this book in the Koc University Library catalogue Find this book in the METU Library catalogue United Kingdom Find this book on the National Library of Wales catalogue Find this book on Library Hub Discover (formerly the Copac union catalogue) (Includes British Library and many universities) Public libraries Find this book on the Birmingham Libraries Online Catalogue Find this book on the Buckinghamshire Libraries Online Catalogue Find this book on the Derbyshire Libraries Online Catalogue Find this book on the Devon Libraries Online Catalogue Find this book on the Kent Libraries Online Catalogue Find this book on the Libraries West catalogue covering libraries in Bristol and the south-west Find this book on the Norfolk Online Library Services catalogue Find this book on the Oxfordshire County Council Library catalogue Universities Find this book on the University College London library catalogue Find this book at the University of Cambridge Find this book on the Cranfield University library catalogue Find this book on the University of Exeter library catalogue Find this book on the University of Dundee library catalogue Find this book on the Durham University library catalogue Find this book on the University of East Anglia library catalogue Find this book on the University of Glasgow library catalogue Find this book on the University of Gloucestershire library catalogue Find this book on Summon at the University of Huddersfield Find this book on the University of Hull library catalogue Find this book on the Imperial College London library catalogue Find this book on the Keele University library catalogue Find this book on the University of Leeds library catalogue Find this book on the University of Liverpool library catalogue Find this book on the University of London, Senate House Libraries library catalogue Find this book on the University of Nottingham library catalogue Find this book on the University of Oxford SOLO catalogue Find this book on the University of Plymouth Voyager catalogue Find this book on the Royal Holloway, University of London library catalogue Find this book on the Sheffield Hallam University library catalogue Find this book on the University of St Andrews library catalogue Find this book on the University of Southampton library catalogue Find this book at the University of Sussex Find this book on the University of Warwick library catalogue Find this book on the University of York library catalogue Bookselling and swapping Price comparison sites Find your book on a site that compiles results from other online sites: Find this book on BookFinder.com Find this book on ISBNdb.com Find this book on ShopWiki Find this book on BookCascade.co.uk Search many booksellers These sites allow you to search the catalogs of many individual booksellers: Find this book on AbeBooks (Mostly used and out-of-print books. Large number of listings.) Find this book at Addall which searches multiple book sellers Find this book on Alibris (Used books, out of print books, etc. A network of independent booksellers. Large number of listings.) Find this book on Bookshop (online book marketplace designed to support independent bookstores) Find this book on Biblio.com (Used, rare and out of print books. 35 million books, 4700 booksellers, many countries.) Find this book on Google Shopping (Google's shopping search service, also available in the UK) Find this book on IndieBound Find this book on NiceBooks.com (New and used, aggregates several sources) Find this book on NiceBooks UK Find this book on Yahoo! Shopping Individual booksellers Find this book on Amazon.com (or .ca, .cn, .de, .es, .fr, .it, .jp, or .uk) Find this book on Angus & Robertson in Australia Find this book on Barnes & Noble Find this book on Better World Books Find this book on BibliOZ Find this book on Bol.com (Mainly Dutch language) Find this book on The Book Depository Find this book on Books-A-Million Find this book on Chapters.indigo.ca Find this book on Dymocks in Australia Find this book on ECampus.com Find this book on eBay Find this book on Fishpond (Australia and New Zealand) Find this book on Flipkart Find this book on Livraria Cultura in Brazil Find this book on MPH Bookstore Malaysia Find this book on National Book Store Find this book on Play.com Find this book on Powell's Books Find this book on Rediff.com Find this book on Strand Bookstore (used – NYC) Find this book on Waterstones Find this book on Wipf and Stock Book-swapping websites Find this book on BookCrossing.com Find this book on BookMooch.com Find this book on inventaire.io Find this book on PaperBackSwap.com Non-English book sources If the book you are looking for is in a language other than English, you might find it helpful to look at the equivalent pages on other Wikipedias, linked below – they are more likely to have sources appropriate for that language. Special:BookSources in other language Wikipedias ISBN Prefix Ranges Wikipedia 0 1 English (this page) 2 979-10 French 3 German 4 (Japan) Japanese 5 (Russia, former USSR) Russian 7 (China, PR) 957/986 (Taiwan, ROC) 962/988 (Hong Kong, SAR) 981 (Singapore) 99937 (Macau, SAR) Chinese 80 (Czech Republic) Czech 83 (Poland) Polish 84 (Spain) 950 (Argentina) 956 (Chile) 958 (Colombia) 959 (Cuba) 968/970 (Mexico) 980 (Venezuela) 9942/9978 (Ecuador) Spanish 85 (Brasil) 972 (Portugal) Portuguese 86 (Serbia, Montenegro) Serbian 86 (former Yugoslavia) 953 (Croatia) Croatian 86 (former Yugoslavia) 961 (Slovenia) Slovenian 87 Danish 88 Italian 89 Korean 90 Dutch 91 Swedish 92 International organizations (multilingual) 93 (India) Hindi 93 (India) 955 (Sri Lanka) Tamil 951/952 (Finland) Finnish 953 Bulgarian 955 (Sri Lanka) Sinhalese 960 Greek 963 Hungarian 964/600 (Iran) Persian 965 (Israel) Hebrew 966 (Ukraine) Ukrainian 967 (Malaysia) Malay 969 (Pakistan) Pashto 971 (Philippines) Tagalog 973 (Romania) Romanian 974 (Thailand) Thai 975/9944/605 (Turkey) Turkish 976 (Caribbean Community) See English, Spanish... 977 (Egypt) 978 (Nigeria) 9960/603 (Saudi Arabia) 9931/9947/9961(Algeria) Arabic 979 (Indonesia) Indonesian 982 (South Pacific) See English, French, ... 984 (Bangladesh) Bangla Welsh Bibliographical information These links produce citations in various referencing styles. Bibliographical Information on OttoBib (MLA) Bibliographical Information on OttoBib (APA) Bibliographical Information on OttoBib (Chicago) Bibliographical Information on OttoBib (Wikipedia) Bibliographical Information on OttoBib (BibTeX) Find other editions You can look up ISBNs for different editions of the same book, hardback or paperback, first print or a reprint, even re-editions where the title has changed using xISBN. xISBN's linkages are determined algorithmically, based on the concepts of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. Results in XML Results in HTML You can also convert between 10 and 13 digit ISBN numbers with these tools: ISBN converter at ISBN.org ISBN converter (with optional hyphenation after conversion) at the Library of Congress Find on Wikipedia Find articles on Wikipedia which cite this ISBN. See also Wikipedia:Book sources – "Wikipedia:Book sources" will be clickable in the non-editable version of this page, and will take one to the editable version of this page. Wikipedia talk:Book sources – For questions and discussion about this page. Wikipedia:ISBN – Explanation of MediaWiki software treatment of ISBN numbers. List of academic databases and search engines List of digital library projects List of online encyclopedias List of online databases Wikipedia:List of bibliographies The Wikipedia Library (talk | e) Apply for free access to research! Research tools and services Resource Exchange Reference Desk Research Desk Discover open access Free Resource Guides Book Sources Journal Sources Bibliographies Free newspaper sources Online archives Find Your Local Library tips Find Your Source tips How to find sources Citation tools guide Outreach The Wikipedia Library Bookshelf (meta) Universities and Libraries Archivists Publishers Wikipedia Loves Libraries Wikidata source metadata Get involved Get free access to sources Read the Books & Bytes newsletter Help disambiguate authors of scholarly papers Be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar Teach Library Interns Become a Coordinator Learn about TWL ...Support Open Access... Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/978-0-19-980511-2" Categories: Wikipedia resources for researchers Hidden categories: Pages with short description Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Special page Variants Views More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools Upload file Special pages Printable version Languages Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1075 ---- Tacitus - Wikipedia Tacitus From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Roman historian and senator (c. 56 - c. 120) For other uses, see Tacitus (disambiguation). Cornelius Tacitus Modern statue representing Tacitus outside the Austrian Parliament Building Born c. 56 AD Died c. 120 AD (aged c. 64) Occupation Historian, politician Genre History, Silver Age of Latin Subject History, biography, oratory Publius (or Gaius) Cornelius Tacitus[note 1] (/ˈtæsɪtəs/ TASS-it-əs, Latin: [ˈtakɪtʊs]; c. AD 56 – c. 120) was a Roman historian and politician. Tacitus is considered by modern scholars to be one of the greatest Roman historians.[2][3] He lived in what has been called the Silver Age of Latin literature, and has a reputation for the brevity and compactness of his Latin prose, as well as for his penetrating insights into the psychology of power politics. The surviving portions of his two major works—the Annals and the Histories—examine the reigns of the emperors Tiberius, Claudius, Nero, and those who reigned in the Year of the Four Emperors (69 AD). These two works span the history of the Roman Empire from the death of Augustus, in 14 AD, to 70 AD in the First Jewish–Roman War of 66–73. There are substantial lacunae in the surviving texts, including a gap in the Annals that is four books long. Tacitus' other writings discuss oratory (in dialogue format, see Dialogus de oratoribus), Germania (in De origine et situ Germanorum), and the life of his father-in-law, Agricola, the general responsible for much of the Roman conquest of Britain, mainly focusing on his campaign in Britannia (De vita et moribus Iulii Agricolae). Contents 1 Life 1.1 Family and early life 1.2 Public life, marriage, and literary career 2 Works 2.1 History of the Roman Empire from the death of Augustus 2.1.1 The Histories 2.1.2 The Annals 2.2 Monographs 2.2.1 Germania 2.2.2 Agricola (De vita et moribus Iulii Agricolae) 2.2.3 Dialogus 3 Literary style 3.1 Approach to history 3.2 Prose 4 Sources 5 Editions 6 See also 7 References 7.1 Notes 7.2 Citations 8 Bibliography 9 External links Life Details about his personal life are scarce. What little is known comes from scattered hints throughout his work, the letters of his friend and admirer Pliny the Younger, and an inscription found at Mylasa in Caria.[4] Tacitus was born in 56 or 57 to an equestrian family;[5] but the exact place and date of his birth are not known, and his praenomen (first name) is also unknown; in the letters of Sidonius Apollinaris his name is Gaius, but in the major surviving manuscript of his work his name is given as Publius.[6] One scholar's suggestion of Sextus has gained no approval.[7] Family and early life Most of the older aristocratic families failed to survive the proscriptions which took place at the end of the Republic, and Tacitus makes it clear that he owed his rank to the Flavian emperors (Hist. 1.1). The claim that he was descended from a freedman is derived from a speech in his writings which asserts that many senators and knights were descended from freedmen (Ann. 13.27), but this is generally disputed.[8] His father may have been the Cornelius Tacitus who served as procurator of Belgica and Germania; Pliny the Elder mentions that Cornelius had a son who aged rapidly (NH 7.76), which implies an early death. There is no mention of Tacitus suffering such a condition, but it is possible that this refers to a brother—if Cornelius was indeed his father.[9] The friendship between the younger Pliny and Tacitus leads some scholars to conclude that they were both the offspring of wealthy provincial families.[10] The province of his birth remains unknown, though various conjectures suggest Gallia Belgica, Gallia Narbonensis or Northern Italy.[11] His marriage to the daughter of Narbonensian senator Gnaeus Julius Agricola implies that he came from Gallia Narbonensis. Tacitus' dedication to Lucius Fabius Justus in the Dialogus may indicate a connection with Spain, and his friendship with Pliny suggests origins in northern Italy.[12] No evidence exists, however, that Pliny's friends from northern Italy knew Tacitus, nor do Pliny's letters hint that the two men had a common background.[13] Pliny Book 9, Letter 23 reports that, when he was asked if he was Italian or provincial, he gave an unclear answer, and so was asked if he was Tacitus or Pliny. Since Pliny was from Italy, some infer that Tacitus was from the provinces, probably Gallia Narbonensis.[14] His ancestry, his skill in oratory, and his sympathetic depiction of barbarians who resisted Roman rule (e.g., Ann. 2.9) have led some to suggest that he was a Celt. This belief stems from the fact that the Celts who had occupied Gaul prior to the Roman invasion were famous for their skill in oratory, and had been subjugated by Rome.[15] Public life, marriage, and literary career As a young man, Tacitus studied rhetoric in Rome to prepare for a career in law and politics; like Pliny, he may have studied under Quintilian[16] (c. 35 AD – c. 100). In 77 or 78, he married Julia Agricola, daughter of the famous general Agricola.[17] Little is known of their domestic life, save that Tacitus loved hunting and the outdoors.[18] He started his career (probably the latus clavus, mark of the senator)[19] under Vespasian[20] (r. 69–79), but entered political life as a quaestor in 81 or 82 under Titus.[21] He advanced steadily through the cursus honorum, becoming praetor in 88 and a quindecimvir, a member of the priestly college in charge of the Sibylline Books and the Secular games.[22] He gained acclaim as a lawyer and as an orator; his skill in public speaking ironically counterpoints his cognomen Tacitus ("silent"). He served in the provinces from c. 89 to c. 93, either in command of a legion or in a civilian post.[23] He and his property survived Domitian's reign of terror (81–96), but the experience left him jaded and perhaps ashamed at his own complicity, installing in him the hatred of tyranny evident in his works.[24] The Agricola, chs. 44–45, is illustrative: Agricola was spared those later years during which Domitian, leaving now no interval or breathing space of time, but, as it were, with one continuous blow, drained the life-blood of the Commonwealth... It was not long before our hands dragged Helvidius to prison, before we gazed on the dying looks of Mauricus and Rusticus, before we were steeped in Senecio's innocent blood. Even Nero turned his eyes away, and did not gaze upon the atrocities which he ordered; with Domitian it was the chief part of our miseries to see and to be seen, to know that our sighs were being recorded... From his seat in the Senate, he became suffect consul in 97 during the reign of Nerva, being the first of his family to do so. During his tenure, he reached the height of his fame as an orator when he delivered the funeral oration for the famous veteran soldier Lucius Verginius Rufus.[25] In the following year, he wrote and published the Agricola and Germania, foreshadowing the literary endeavors that would occupy him until his death.[26] Afterwards, he absented himself from public life, but returned during Trajan's reign (98–117). In 100, he and his friend Pliny the Younger prosecuted Marius Priscus [la] (proconsul of Africa) for corruption. Priscus was found guilty and sent into exile; Pliny wrote a few days later that Tacitus had spoken "with all the majesty which characterizes his usual style of oratory".[27] A lengthy absence from politics and law followed while he wrote the Histories and the Annals. In 112 to 113, he held the highest civilian governorship, that of the Roman province of Asia in Western Anatolia,[28] recorded in the inscription found at Mylasa mentioned above. A passage in the Annals fixes 116 as the terminus post quem of his death, which may have been as late as 125 or even 130. It seems that he survived both Pliny (died c. 113) and Trajan (died 117).[29] It remains unknown whether Tacitus had any children. The Augustan History reports that Emperor Marcus Claudius Tacitus (r. 275–276) claimed him for an ancestor and provided for the preservation of his works, but this story may be fraudulent, like much of the Augustan History.[30] Works See also: List of people mentioned in the works of Tacitus The title page of Justus Lipsius's 1598 edition of the complete works of Tacitus, bearing the stamps of the Bibliotheca Comunale in Empoli, Italy Five works ascribed to Tacitus have survived (albeit with lacunae), the most substantial of which are the Annals and the Histories. This canon (with approximate dates) consists of: (98) De vita Iulii Agricolae (The Life of Agricola) (98) De origine et situ Germanorum (Germania) (102) Dialogus de oratoribus (Dialogue on Oratory) (105) Historiae (Histories) (117) Ab excessu divi Augusti (Annals) History of the Roman Empire from the death of Augustus The Annals and the Histories, published separately, were meant to form a single edition of thirty books.[31] Although Tacitus wrote the Histories before the Annals, the events in the Annals precede the Histories; together they form a continuous narrative from the death of Augustus (14) to the death of Domitian (96). Though most has been lost, what remains is an invaluable record of the era. The first half of the Annals survived in a single manuscript from Corvey Abbey in Germany, and the second half in a single manuscript from Monte Cassino in Italy, and it is remarkable that they survived at all. The Histories Main article: Histories (Tacitus) In an early chapter of the Agricola, Tacitus asserts that he wishes to speak about the years of Domitian, Nerva and Trajan. In the Histories the scope has changed; Tacitus says that he will deal with the age of Nerva and Trajan at a later time. Instead, he will cover the period from the civil wars of the Year of the Four Emperors and end with the despotism of the Flavians. Only the first four books and twenty-six chapters of the fifth book survive, covering the year 69 and the first part of 70. The work is believed to have continued up to the death of Domitian on September 18, 96. The fifth book contains—as a prelude to the account of Titus's suppression of the First Jewish–Roman War—a short ethnographic survey of the ancient Jews, and it is an invaluable record of Roman attitudes towards them. The Annals Main article: Annals (Tacitus) The Annals, Tacitus' final work, covers the period from the death of Augustus in 14 AD. He wrote at least sixteen books, but books 7–10 and parts of books 5, 6, 11 and 16 are missing. Book 6 ends with the death of Tiberius and books 7 to 12 presumably covered the reigns of Caligula and Claudius. The remaining books cover the reign of Nero, perhaps until his death in June 68 or until the end of that year to connect with the Histories. The second half of book 16 is missing, ending with the events of 66. It is not known whether Tacitus completed the work; he died before he could complete his planned histories of Nerva and Trajan and no record survives of the work on Augustus and the beginnings of the Roman Empire, with which he had planned to finish his work. The Annals is one of the earliest secular historical records to mention Christ, which Tacitus does in connection with Nero's persecution of the Christians. Annals 15.44, in the second Medicean manuscript Monographs Tacitus wrote three works with a more limited scope. Agricola, a biography of his father-in-law Gnaeus Julius Agricola; the Germania, a monograph on the lands and tribes of barbarian Germania; and the Dialogus, a dialogue on the art of rhetoric. Germania Main article: Germania (book) The Germania (Latin title: De Origine et situ Germanorum) is an ethnographic work on the Germanic tribes outside the Roman Empire. The Germania fits within a classical ethnographic tradition which includes authors such as Herodotus and Julius Caesar. The book begins (chapters 1–27) with a description of the lands, laws, and customs of the various tribes. Later chapters focus on descriptions of particular tribes, beginning with those who lived closest to the Roman empire, and ending with a description of those who lived on the shores of the Baltic Sea, such as the Fenni. Tacitus had written a similar, albeit shorter, piece in his Agricola (chapters 10–13). Agricola (De vita et moribus Iulii Agricolae) Main article: Agricola (book) The Agricola (written c. 98) recounts the life of Gnaeus Julius Agricola, an eminent Roman general and Tacitus' father-in-law; it also covers, briefly, the geography and ethnography of ancient Britain. As in the Germania, Tacitus favorably contrasts the liberty of the native Britons with the tyranny and corruption of the Empire; the book also contains eloquent polemics against the greed of Rome, one of which, that Tacitus claims is from a speech by Calgacus, ends by asserting that Auferre trucidare rapere falsis nominibus imperium, atque ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant. (To ravage, to slaughter, to usurp under false titles, they call empire; and where they make a desert, they call it peace. —Oxford Revised Translation). Dialogus Main article: Dialogus de oratoribus The style of the Dialogus follows Cicero's models for Latin rhetoric. There is uncertainty about when Tacitus wrote Dialogus de oratoribus. Many characteristics set it apart from the other works of Tacitus, so that its authenticity has at various times been questioned. It is likely to be early work, indebted to the author's rhetorical training, since its style imitates that of the foremost Roman orator Cicero. It lacks (for example) the incongruities that are typical of his mature historical works. The Dialogus is dedicated to Fabius Iustus, a consul in 102 AD. Literary style Tacitus's writings are known for their dense prose that seldom glosses the facts, in contrast to the style of some of his contemporaries, such as Plutarch. When he writes about a near-defeat of the Roman army in Ann. I, 63 he does so with brevity of description rather than embellishment. In most of his writings he keeps to a chronological narrative order, only seldom outlining the bigger picture, leaving the readers to construct that picture for themselves. Nonetheless, where he does use broad strokes, for example, in the opening paragraphs of the Annals, he uses a few condensed phrases which take the reader to the heart of the story. Approach to history Tacitus's historical style owes some debt to Sallust. His historiography offers penetrating—often pessimistic—insights into the psychology of power politics, blending straightforward descriptions of events, moral lessons, and tightly focused dramatic accounts. Tacitus's own declaration regarding his approach to history (Annals I,1) is well known: "inde consilium mihi ... tradere ... sine ira et studio, quorum causas procul habeo."   my purpose is to relate ... without either anger or zeal, motives from which I am far removed. There has been much scholarly discussion about Tacitus' "neutrality". Throughout his writing, he is preoccupied with the balance of power between the Senate and the emperors, and the increasing corruption of the governing classes of Rome as they adjusted to the ever-growing wealth and power of the empire. In Tacitus's view, Senators squandered their cultural inheritance—that of free speech—to placate their (rarely benign) emperor. Tacitus noted the increasing dependence of the emperor on the goodwill of his armies. The Julio-Claudians eventually gave way to generals, who followed Julius Caesar (and Sulla and Pompey) in recognizing that military might could secure them the political power in Rome.(Hist.1.4) Welcome as the death of Nero had been in the first burst of joy, yet it had not only roused various emotions in Rome, among the Senators, the people, or the soldiery of the capital, it had also excited all the legions and their generals; for now had been divulged that secret of the empire, that emperors could be made elsewhere than at Rome. Tacitus's political career was largely lived out under the emperor Domitian. His experience of the tyranny, corruption, and decadence of that era (81–96) may explain the bitterness and irony of his political analysis. He draws our attention to the dangers of power without accountability, love of power untempered by principle, and the apathy and corruption engendered by the concentration of wealth generated through trade and conquest by the empire. Nonetheless, the image he builds of Tiberius throughout the first six books of the Annals is neither exclusively bleak nor approving: most scholars view the image of Tiberius as predominantly positive in the first books, and predominantly negative after the intrigues of Sejanus. The entrance of Tiberius in the first chapters of the first book is dominated by the hypocrisy of the new emperor and his courtiers. In the later books, some respect is evident for the cleverness of the old emperor in securing his position. In general, Tacitus does not fear to praise and to criticize the same person, often noting what he takes to be their more-admirable and less-admirable properties. One of Tacitus's hallmarks is refraining from conclusively taking sides for or against persons he describes, which has led some to interpret his works as both supporting and rejecting the imperial system (see Tacitean studies, Black vs. Red Tacitists). Prose His Latin style is highly praised.[32] His style, although it has a grandeur and eloquence (thanks to Tacitus's education in rhetoric), is extremely concise, even epigrammatic—the sentences are rarely flowing or beautiful, but their point is always clear. The style has been both derided as "harsh, unpleasant, and thorny" and praised as "grave, concise, and pithily eloquent". A passage of Annals 1.1, where Tacitus laments the state of the historiography regarding the last four emperors of the Julio-Claudian dynasty, illustrates his style: "The histories of Tiberius, Gaius, Claudius and Nero, while they were in power, were falsified through terror and after their death were written under the irritation of a recent hatred",[33] or in a word-for-word translation: Tiberiī Gāīque et Claudiī ac Nerōnis rēs flōrentibus ipsīs—ob metum—falsae, postquam occiderant—recentibus ōdiīs—compositae sunt.   Tiberius', Gaius' and Claudius' as well as Nero's acts while flourishing themselves—out of fear—counterfeited, after they came to fall—resulting from new-found hate— related are. (interpunction and linebreaks added for clarity) Compared to the Ciceronian period, where sentences were usually the length of a paragraph and artfully constructed with nested pairs of carefully matched sonorous phrases, this is short and to the point. But it is also very individual. Note the three different ways of saying and in the first line (-que, et, ac), and especially the matched second and third lines. They are parallel in sense but not in sound; the pairs of words ending "…-entibus …-is" are crossed over in a way that deliberately breaks the Ciceronian conventions—which one would however need to be acquainted with to see the novelty of Tacitus' style. Some readers, then and now, find this teasing of their expectations merely irritating. Others find the deliberate discord, playing against the evident parallelism of the two lines, stimulating and intriguing.[34] His historical works focus on the motives of the characters, often with penetrating insight—though it is questionable how much of his insight is correct, and how much is convincing only because of his rhetorical skill.[35] He is at his best when exposing hypocrisy and dissimulation; for example, he follows a narrative recounting Tiberius's refusal of the title pater patriae by recalling the institution of a law forbidding any "treasonous" speech or writings—and the frivolous prosecutions which resulted (Annals, 1.72). Elsewhere (Annals 4.64–66) he compares Tiberius's public distribution of fire relief to his failure to stop the perversions and abuses of justice which he had begun. Although this kind of insight has earned him praise, he has also been criticized for ignoring the larger context. Tacitus owes most, both in language and in method, to Sallust, and Ammianus Marcellinus is the later historian whose work most closely approaches him in style. Sources Tacitus makes use of the official sources of the Roman state: the acta senatus (the minutes of the sessions of the Senate) and the acta diurna populi Romani (a collection of the acts of the government and news of the court and capital). He also read collections of emperors' speeches, such as those of Tiberius and Claudius. He is generally seen[by whom?] as a scrupulous historian who paid careful attention to his sources. The minor inaccuracies in the Annals may be due to Tacitus dying before he had finished (and therefore before he had proof-read) his work. Tacitus cites some of his sources directly, among them Cluvius Rufus, Fabius Rusticus and Pliny the Elder, who had written Bella Germaniae and a historical work which was the continuation of that of Aufidius Bassus. Tacitus also uses collections of letters (epistolarium). He also took information from exitus illustrium virorum. These were a collection of books by those who were antithetical to the emperors. They tell of sacrifices by martyrs to freedom, especially the men who committed suicide. While he places no value on the Stoic theory of suicide and views suicides as ostentatious and politically useless, Tacitus often gives prominence to speeches made by those about to commit suicide, for example Cremutius Cordus' speech in Ann. IV, 34–35. Editions Damon, Cynthia (2003) Tacitus: Histories Book I. Cambridge Greek and Latin Classics. Cambridge University Press. Ash, Rhiannon (2007) Tacitus: Histories Book II. Cambridge Greek and Latin Classics.Cambridge University Press. Malloch, S. J. V. (2013) The Annals of Tacitus, book 11. Cambridge Classical Texts and Commentaries. Cambridge University Press. See also The Republic (Plato): Tacitus' critique of "model state" philosophies Tacitus on Christ: a well-known passage from the Annals mentions the death of Jesus of Nazareth (Ann., xv 44) Claude Fauchet: the first person to translate all of Tacitus's works into French Justus Lipsius: produced an extremely influential early modern edition of Tacitus (1574) References Notes ^ His full nomenclature may have been "Publius Cornelius Tacitus Caecina Paetus".[1] Citations ^ Birley 2000, p. 232. ^ Van Voorst, Robert; Evans, Craig A.; Chilton, Bruce (2000). "Tacitus: The Executed Christ". In Evans, Craig A.; Chilton, Bruce (eds.). Jesus Outside the New Testament: An Introduction to the Ancient Evidence Studying the Historical Jesus. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. p. 39. ISBN 9780802843685. Retrieved 7 June 2020. Cornelius Tacitus is generally considered the greatest Roman historian [...]. ^ Compare: Ferguson, Everett (1987). "Literature and language". Backgrounds of Early Christianity (3 ed.). Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B. Eerdmans Publishing (published 2003). p. 116. ISBN 9780802822215. Retrieved 7 June 2020. The Silver Age produced two outstanding historians. Cornelius Tacitus (c. A.D. 55-120), through his Histories and the Annals, is the major source for the history of the empire in the first century. ^ OGIS 487, first brought to light in Bulletin de correspondance hellénique, 1890, pp. 621–623 ^ Since he was appointed to the quaestorship during Titus's short rule (see note below) and twenty-five was the minimum age for the position, the date of his birth can be fixed with some accuracy ^ See Oliver, 1951, for an analysis of the manuscript from which the name Publius is taken; see also Oliver, 1977, which examines the evidence for each suggested praenomen (the well-known Gaius and Publius, the lesser-known suggestions of Sextus and Quintus) before settling on Publius as the most likely. ^ Oliver, 1977, cites an article by Harold Mattingly in Rivista storica dell'Antichità, 2 (1972) 169–185 ^ Syme, 1958, pp. 612–613; Gordon, 1936, pp. 145–146 ^ Syme, 1958, p. 60, 613; Gordon, 1936, p. 149; Martin, 1981, p. 26 ^ Syme, 1958, p. 63 ^ Michael Grant in Introduction to Tacitus, The Annals of Imperial Rome, p. xvii; Herbert W. Benario in Introduction to Tacitus, Germany, p. 1. ^ Syme, 1958, pp. 614–616 ^ Syme, 1958, pp. 616–619 ^ Syme, 1958, p. 619; Gordon, 1936, p. 145 ^ Gordon, 1936, pp. 150–151; Syme, 1958, pp. 621–624 ^ The fact that he studied rhetoric and law is known from the Dialogus, ch. 2; see also Martin, 1981, p. 26; Syme, 1958, pp. 114–115 ^ Agricola, 9 ^ Pliny, Letters 1.6, 9.10; Benario, 1975, pp. 15, 17; Syme, 1958, pp. 541–542 ^ Syme, 1958, p. 63; Martin, 1981, pp. 26–27 ^ (1.1) ^ He states his debt to Titus in his Histories (1.1); since Titus ruled only briefly, these are the only years possible. ^ In the Annals (11.11), he mentions that, as praetor, he assisted in the Secular Games held by Domitian, which can be precisely dated to 88. See Syme, 1958, p. 65; Martin, 1981, p. 27; Benario in his Introduction to Tacitus, Germany, p. 1. ^ The Agricola (45.5) indicates that Tacitus and his wife were absent at the time of Julius Agricola's death in 93. For his occupation during this time see Syme, 1958, p. 68; Benario, 1975, p. 13; Dudley, 1968, pp. 15–16; Martin, 1981, p. 28; Mellor, 1993, p. 8 ^ For the effects on Tacitus of this experience see Dudley, 1968, p. 14; Mellor, 1993, pp. 8–9 ^ Pliny, Letters, 2.1 (English); Benario in his Introduction to Tacitus, Germany, pp. 1–2. ^ In the Agricola (3), he announces what was probably his first major project: the Histories. See Dudley, 1968, p. 16 ^ Pliny, Letters 2.11 ^ Hazel, J. (2002). Who's who in the Roman World. Routledge who's who series. Routledge. p. 297. ISBN 978-0-415-29162-0. Retrieved 28 August 2018. Seniority brought him the governorship of the province of Asia as proconsul in 112–113. ^ Grant in his Introduction to Tacitus, Annals, p. xvii; Benario in his Introduction to Tacitus, Germania, p. 2. Annals, 2.61, says that the Roman Empire "now extends to the Red Sea". If by mare rubrum he means the Persian Gulf, the passage must have been written after Trajan's eastern conquests in 116, but before Hadrian abandoned the new territories in 117. But this may only indicate the date of publication for the first books of the Annals; Tacitus could have lived well into Hadrian's reign, and there is no reason to suppose that he did not. See Dudley, 1968, p. 17; Mellor, 1993, p. 9; Mendell, 1957, p. 7; Syme, 1958, p. 473; against this traditional interpretation, e.g., Goodyear, 1981, pp. 387–393. ^ Augustan History, Tacitus X. Scholarly opinion on this story is that it is either "a confused and worthless rumor" (Mendell, 1957, p. 4) or "pure fiction" (Syme, 1958, p. 796). Sidonius Apollinaris reports (Letters, 4.14; cited in Syme, 1958, p. 796) that Polemius, a 5th-century Gallo-Roman aristocrat, is descended from Tacitus—but this claim, says Syme (ibid.), is of little value. ^ Jerome's commentary on the Book of Zechariah (14.1, 2; quoted in Mendell, 1957, p. 228) says that Tacitus's history was extant triginta voluminibus, "in thirty volumes". ^ Donald R. Dudley. Introduction to: The Annals of Tacitus. NY: Mentor Book, 1966. p. xiv: "No other writer of Latin prose—not even Cicero—deploys so effectively the full resources of the language." ^ The Annals (Tacitus)/Book 1#1 Translation based on Alfred John Church and William Jackson Brodribb (1876). Wikisource, 15 April 2012. ^ Ostler 2007, pp. 98–99 where the quoted example is used; Further quotes from the book: "…some writers—notably the perverse genius Tacitus—delighted in disappointing the expectations raised by periodic theory." – "this monkeying with hard-won stylistic norms…only makes sense if readers knew the rules that Tacitus was breaking." ^ John Taylor. Tacitus and the Boudican Revolt. Dublin: Camvlos, 1998. p. 1 ff Bibliography Benario, Herbert W. An Introduction to Tacitus. (Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 1975) ISBN 0-8203-0361-5 Birley, Anthony R. (2000). "The Life and Death of Cornelius Tacitus". Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte. 49 (2): 230–247. ISSN 0018-2311. JSTOR 4436577. Burke, P. "Tacitism" in Dorey, T.A., 1969, pp. 149–171 Damon, Cynthia. "Relatio vs. Oratio: Tacitus, Ann. 3.12 and the Senatus Consultum De Cn. Pisone Patre." The Classical Quarterly, vol. 49, no. 1, (1999), pp. 336–338 Damon, Cynthia. "The Trial of Cn. Piso in Tacitus' Annals and the ‘Senatus Consultum De Cn. Pisone Patre’: New Light on Narrative Technique." The American Journal of Philology, vol. 120, no. 1, (1999), pp. 143–162. Damon, Cynthia. Writing with Posterity in Mind: Thucydides and Tacitus on Secession. In The Oxford Handbook of Thucydides. (Oxford University Press, 2017). Dudley, Donald R. The World of Tacitus (London: Secker and Warburg, 1968) ISBN 0-436-13900-6 Goodyear, F.R.D. The Annals of Tacitus, vol. 2 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981). Commentary on Annals 1.55–81 and Annals 2. Gordon, Mary L. "The Patria of Tacitus". The Journal of Roman Studies, Vol. 26, Part 2 (1936), pp. 145–151. Martin, Ronald. Tacitus (London: Batsford, 1981) Mellor, Ronald. Tacitus (New York / London: Routledge, 1993) ISBN 0-415-90665-2, 0415910021, 978-0415910026 Mellor, Ronald. Tacitus’ Annals (Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2010) (Oxford Approaches to Classical Literature) ISBN 0198034679, 978-0198034674 Mellor, Ronald (ed.). Tacitus: The Classical Heritage (New York: Garland Publishing, 1995) ISBN 0-8153-0933-3, 978-0815309338 Mendell, Clarence. Tacitus: The Man and His Work. (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1957) ISBN 0-208-00818-7 Oliver, Revilo P. "The First Medicean MS of Tacitus and the Titulature of Ancient Books". Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association, Vol. 82 (1951), pp. 232–261. Oliver, Revilo P. "The Praenomen of Tacitus". The American Journal of Philology, Vol. 98, No. 1 (Spring, 1977), pp. 64–70. Ostler, Nicholas. Ad Infinitum: A Biography of Latin. HarperCollins in the UK, and Walker & Co. in the US: London and New York, 2007. ISBN 978-0-00-734306-5; 2009 edition: ISBN 080271840X, 978-0802718402 – 2010 e-book: ISBN 0007364881, 978-0007364886 Syme, Ronald. Tacitus, Volumes 1 and 2. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1958) (reprinted in 1985 by the same publisher, with the ISBN 0-19-814327-3) is the definitive study of his life and works. Tacitus, The Annals of Imperial Rome. Translated by Michael Grant and first published in this form in 1956. (London: The Folio Society, 2006) Tacitus, Germany. Translated by Herbert W. Benario. (Warminster, UK: Aris & Phillips Ltd., 1999. ISBN 0-85668-716-2) Taylor, John W. Tacitus and the Boudican Revolt. (Dublin, Ireland: Camuvlos, 1998) External links Wikiquote has quotations related to: Tacitus Wikisource has original works written by or about: Tacitus Wikimedia Commons has media related to Gaius Cornelius Tacitus. Library resources about Tacitus Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries By Tacitus Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries Works by Tacitus Works by Tacitus at Project Gutenberg Works by or about Tacitus at Internet Archive Works by Tacitus at LibriVox (public domain audiobooks) Works by Tacitus at Perseus Digital Library Comprehensive links to Latin text and translations in various languages at ForumRomanum Complete works, Latin and English translation at "The Internet Sacred Text Archive" (not listed above) Agricola and Annals 15.20–23, 33–45 at Dickinson College Commentaries Political offices Preceded by Quintus Glitius Atilius Agricola, and Lucius Pomponius Maternus as Suffect consuls Suffect consul of the Roman Empire 97 with Marcus Ostorius Scapula Succeeded by Nerva IV, and Trajan II as Ordinary consuls v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films Authority control BIBSYS: 90098107 BNE: XX911272 BNF: cb11887667z (data) CANTIC: a10166312 CiNii: DA00465423 GND: 118620452 HDS: 010313 ICCU: IT\ICCU\CFIV\000651 ISNI: 0000 0001 2103 3889 LCCN: n80145600 LNB: 000042933 NDL: 00458252 NKC: jn19990008405 NLG: 62586 NLK: KAC199636834 NSK: 000034703 NTA: 068832583 RERO: 02-A000160154 SELIBR: 200157 SNAC: w6rr2c2f SUDOC: 026672316 Trove: 988665 VcBA: 495/52539 VIAF: 100226923 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n80145600 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tacitus&oldid=993381193" Categories: Tacitus 1st-century Gallo-Roman people 1st-century writers 1st-century historians 2nd-century Gallo-Roman people 2nd-century historians 2nd-century writers 50s births 120s deaths Ancient Roman jurists Ancient Roman rhetoricians Cornelii Latin historians Roman governors of Asia Roman-era biographers Senators of the Roman Empire Silver Age Latin writers Suffect consuls of Imperial Rome Hidden categories: Wikipedia semi-protected pages Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata Wikipedia indefinitely move-protected pages Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases from October 2018 Commons category link is on Wikidata Articles with Project Gutenberg links Articles with Internet Archive links Articles with LibriVox links Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CANTIC identifiers Wikipedia articles with CINII identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with HDS identifiers Wikipedia articles with ICCU identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with LNB identifiers Wikipedia articles with NDL identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLG identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NSK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with RERO identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SNAC-ID identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with Trove identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Year of birth uncertain Year of death uncertain Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read View source View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikiquote Wikisource Languages Afrikaans Alemannisch العربية Aragonés Asturianu Azərbaycanca বাংলা Bân-lâm-gú Беларуская Български Bosanski Brezhoneg Català Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Estremeñu Euskara فارسی Français Frysk Furlan Gaeilge Galego 한국어 Հայերեն Hrvatski Ido Bahasa Indonesia Interlingua Íslenska Italiano עברית ქართული Қазақша Kiswahili Latina Latviešu Lietuvių Lingua Franca Nova Magyar Malagasy മലയാളം Nederlands Nedersaksies 日本語 Nordfriisk Norsk bokmål Norsk nynorsk Occitan Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча Polski Português Română Rumantsch Русский Scots Shqip Sicilianu Simple English Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska ไทย Türkçe Українська Tiếng Việt Winaray 吴语 粵語 Zazaki 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 10 December 2020, at 08:54 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1076 ---- Pierre de Ronsard - Wikipedia Pierre de Ronsard From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search French poet For the main-belt asteroid, see 10139 Ronsard. For the rose cultivar, see Pierre de Ronsard (rose). Not to be confused with the painter Hans Zatzka. Born 11 September 1524 Couture-sur-Loir, Kingdom of France Died 27 December 1585(1585-12-27) (aged 61) La Riche, Kingdom of France Occupation Poet Language Middle French Nationality French Education Collège de Navarre Literary movement La Pléiade Notable works Les Odes, Les Amours, Sonnets pour Hélène, Discours French literature by category French literary history Medieval Renaissance 17th 18th 19th 20th century Contemporary French writers Chronological list Writers by category Essayists Novelists Playwrights Poets Short story writers Children's writers Portals France Literature v t e Pierre de Ronsard (11 September 1524 – 27 December 1585) was a French poet or, as his own generation in France called him, a "prince of poets". Contents 1 Early life 2 Studies 3 Fame 4 Final years 5 Works 6 Bibliography 7 Notes 8 References 9 Further reading 9.1 General 9.2 Criticism 10 External links Early life[edit] Manoir de la Possonnière, Ronsard's home Pierre de Ronsard was born at the Manoir de la Possonnière, in the village of Couture-sur-Loir, Vendômois (in present-day Loir-et-Cher). Baudouin de Ronsard or Rossart was the founder of the French branch of the house, and made his mark in the early stages of the Hundred Years' War. The poet's father was Louis de Ronsard, and his mother was Jeanne de Chaudrier, of a family both noble and well connected. Pierre was the youngest son. Louis de Ronsard was maître d'hôtel du roi to Francis I, whose captivity after Pavia had just been softened by treaty, and he had to quit his home shortly after Pierre's birth. The future poet was educated at home in his earliest years and sent to the Collège de Navarre in Paris at the age of nine. When Madeleine of France was married to James V of Scotland, Ronsard was attached as a page in the Scottish court, where he was encouraged in the idea of making French vernacular translations of classical authors.[1] A year after the death of the queen, he returned to France, travelling back through England. Further travel took him to Flanders, Holland, and again, for a short time, Scotland, on diplomatic missions under Claude d'Humières, seigneur de Lassigny,[2] until he was attached as secretary to the suite of Lazare de Baïf, the father of his future colleague in the Pléiade and his companion on this occasion, Antoine de Baïf, at the diet of Speyer. Afterwards he was attached in the same way to the suite of the cardinal du Bellay-Langey, and his mythical quarrel with François Rabelais dates from this period. Studies[edit] His apparently promising diplomatic career was, however, cut short by an attack of deafness following a 1540 visit, as part of legation to Alsace, that no physician could cure; he would subsequently determine to devote himself to study. The institution he chose for the purpose among the numerous schools and colleges of Paris was the Collège Coqueret, the principal of which was Jean Daurat — afterwards the "dark star" (as he has been called from his silence in French) of the Pléiade, and already an acquaintance of Ronsard's from having held the office of tutor in the Baïf household. Antoine de Baïf, Daurat's pupil, accompanied Ronsard; Belleau shortly followed; Joachim du Bellay, the second of the seven, joined not much later. Muretus (Marc Antoine de Muret), a great scholar and by means of his Latin plays a great influence in the creation of French tragedy, was also a student here. Ronsard's period of study occupied seven years, and the first manifesto of the new literary movement, which was to apply to the vernacular the principles of criticism and scholarship learnt from the classics, came not from him but from Du Bellay. The Défense et illustration de la langue française of the latter appeared in 1549, and the Pléiade (or Brigade, as it was first called) may be said to have been then launched. It consisted, as its name implies, of seven writers whose names are sometimes differently enumerated, though the orthodox canon is beyond doubt composed of Ronsard, Du Bellay, Baïf, Remy Belleau, Pontus de Tyard (a man of rank and position who had exemplified the principles of the friends earlier), Jodelle the dramatist, and Daurat. Ronsard's own work came a little later, and a rather idle story is told of a trick of Du Bellay's which at last determined him to publish. Some single and minor pieces, an epithalamium on Antoine de Bourbon and Jeanne de Navarre (1550), a "Hymne de la France" (1549), an "Ode a la Paix," preceded the publication in 1550 of the four first books ("first" is characteristic and noteworthy) of the Odes of Pierre de Ronsard. This was followed in 1552 by the publication of his Amours de Cassandre with the fifth book of Odes, dedicated to the 15-year-old Cassandre Salviati, whom he had met at Blois and followed to her father's Château de Talcy. These books excited a violent literary quarrel. Marot was dead, but he left numerous followers, some of whom saw in the stricter literary critique of the Pléiade, in its outspoken contempt of merely vernacular and medieval forms, in its strenuous advice to French poetry to "follow the ancients," and so forth, an insult to the author of the Adolescence Clémentine and his school.[3] Fame[edit] Pierre de Ronsard His popularity in his own time was overwhelming and immediate, and his prosperity was unbroken. He published his Hymns, dedicated to Margaret de Valois, in 1555; the conclusion of the Amours, addressed to another heroine, in 1556; and then a collection of Œuvres completes, said to be due to the invitation of Mary Stuart, Queen of Francis II, in 1560; with Elégies, mascarades et bergeries in 1565. To this same year belongs his most important and interesting Abrégé de l'art poétique français. The rapid change of sovereigns did Ronsard no harm. Charles IX, King of France, who succeeded his brother after a very short time, was even better inclined to him than Henry and Francis. He gave him rooms in the palace; he bestowed upon him diverse abbacies and priories; and he called him and regarded him constantly as his master in poetry. Neither was Charles IX a bad poet. This royal patronage, however, had its disagreeable side. It excited violent dislike to Ronsard on the part of the Huguenots, who wrote constant pasquinades against him, strove (by a ridiculous exaggeration of the Dionysiac festival at Arcueil, in which the friends had indulged to celebrate the success of the first French tragedy, Jodelle's Cleopatre) to represent him as a libertine and an atheist, and (which seems to have annoyed him more than anything else) set up his follower Du Bartas as his rival. According to some words of his own, they were not contented with this variety of argument, but attempted to have him assassinated. During this period, Ronsard began writing the epic poem the Franciade (1572), a work that was never finished and is generally considered a failure due to its versification—a decasyllabic metre of rimes plates that corresponds poorly with the genre of epic poetry. The metre (the decasyllable) could not but contrast unfavourably with the magnificent alexandrines that Du Bartas and Agrippa d'Aubigné were shortly to produce; the general plan is feebly classical, and the very language has little or nothing of that racy mixture of scholarliness and love of natural beauty which distinguishes the best work of the Pléiade. The poem could never have had an abiding success, but at its appearance it had the singular bad luck almost to coincide with the massacre of St Bartholomew, which had occurred about a fortnight before its publication. One party in the state were certain to look coldly on the work of a minion of the court at such a juncture, the other had something else to think of. The death of Charles made little difference in the court favour which Ronsard enjoyed, but, combined with his increasing infirmities, it seems to have determined him to quit court life. During his last days he lived chiefly at a house which he possessed in Vendôme, the capital of his native province, at his abbey at Croix-Val in the same neighbourhood, or else at Paris, where he was usually the guest of Jean Galland, well known as a scholar, at the College de Boncourt. It seems also that he had a town house of his own in the Fauhourg Saint-Marcel. At any rate his preferments made him in perfectly easy circumstances, and he seems neither to have derived nor wished for any profit from his books. A half-jocular suggestion that his publishers should give him money to buy "du bois pour se chauffer" in return for his last revision of his Œuvres complètes is the only trace of any desire of the kind. On the other hand, he received not merely gifts and endowments from his own sovereign but presents from many others, including Elizabeth I of England. Mary, Queen of Scots addressed him from her prison, and Tasso consulted him on the Gerusalemme. Final years[edit] His last years were saddened not merely by the death of many of his closest friends, but by increasing ill health. This did not interfere with the quality of his literary work; he was rarely idle, and some of his final verse is among his best. But he indulged the temptation to alter his work repeatedly, and many of his later alterations are not improvements. Towards the end of 1585 his health deteriorated, and he seems to have moved restlessly from one of his houses to another for some months. When the end came—which, though in great pain, he met in a resolute and religious manner—he was at his priory of Saint-Cosme in Touraine, and he was buried in the church of that name on Friday, 27 December 1585. Works[edit] A 1571 book of Ronsard's works The character and fortunes of Ronsard's works are among the most remarkable in literary history, and supply in themselves a kind of illustration of the progress of French literature during the last three centuries. It was long his fortune to be almost always extravagantly admired or violently attacked. At first, as has been said, the enmity, not altogether unprovoked, of the friends and followers of Marot fell to his lot, then the still fiercer antagonism of the Huguenot faction, who, happening to possess a poet of great merit in Du Bartas, were able to attack Ronsard at his tenderest point. But fate had by no means done its worst with him in his lifetime. After his death the classical reaction set in under the auspices of Malherbe, who seems to have been animated with a sort of personal hatred of Ronsard, though it is not clear that they ever met. After Malherbe, the rising glory of Corneille and his contemporaries obscured the tentative and unequal work of the Pléiade, which was, moreover, directly attacked by Boileau himself, the dictator of French criticism in the last half of the 17th century. Then Ronsard was, except by a few men of taste, such as Jean de La Bruyère and Fénelon, forgotten when he was not sneered at. In this condition he remained during the whole 18th century and the first quarter of the 19th. The Romantic revival, seeing in him a victim of its special bête noire Boileau, and attracted by his splendid diction, rich metrical faculty, and combination of classical and medieval peculiarities, adopted his name as a kind of battle-cry, and for the moment exaggerated his merits somewhat. The critical work of Sainte-Beuve in his Tableau de la littérature francaise au 16ème siècle, and later of other authors, has established Ronsard's reputation. Ronsard was the acknowledged chief of the Pléiade and its most voluminous poet. He was probably also its best, though a few isolated pieces of Belleau excel him in airy lightness of touch. Several sonnets of Du Bellay exhibit the melancholy of the Renaissance more perfectly than anything of his, and the finest passages of the Tragiques and the Divine Sep'Maine surpass his work in command of the alexandrine and in power of turning it to the purposes of satirical invective and descriptive narration. But that work is very extensive (we possess at a rough guess not much short of a hundred thousand lines of his), and it is extraordinarily varied in form. He did not introduce the sonnet into France, but he practised it soon after its introduction and with skill - the famous "Quand vous serez bien vieille" being one of the acknowledged gems of French literature. Rose cultivar 'Pierre de Ronsard', named in reference to Ronsard's poem Ode à Cassandre (Mignonne, allons voir si la rose...) His many odes are interesting, and at best are fine compositions. He began by imitating the strophic arrangement of the ancients, but very soon had the wisdom to desert this for a kind of adjustment of the Horatian ode to rhyme, instead of exact quantitative metre. In this latter kind he devised some exquisitely melodious rhythms of which, till our own day, the secret died with the 17th century. His more sustained work sometimes displays a bad selection of measure; and his occasional poetry—epistles, eclogues, elegies, etc.--is injured by its vast volume. But the preface to the Franciade is a fine piece of verse, superior (it is in alexandrines) to the poem itself. In general, Ronsard is best in his amatory verse (the long series of sonnets and odes to Cassandre, Pikles, Marie, Genévre, Héléne—Héléne de Surgeres, a later and mainly "literary" love—etc.), and in his descriptions of the country (the famous "Ode à Cassandre[1]," the "Fontaine Bellerie," the "Forêt de Gastine," and so forth), which are graceful and fresh. He used the graceful diminutives which his school set in fashion. He knew well too how to manage the gorgeous adjectives ("marbrine," "cinabrine," "ivoirine" and the like) which were another fancy of the Pléiade. In short, Ronsard shows eminently the two great attractions of French 16th-century poetry as compared with that of the two following ages - magnificence of language and imagery and graceful variety of metre. Bibliography[edit] Bust and inscription of Pierre de Ronsard at the Château de Blois. The chief separately published works of Ronsard are noted above. He produced, however, during his life a vast number of separate publications, some of them mere pamphlets or broadsheets, which from time to time he collected, often striking out others at the same time, in the successive editions of his works. Of these he himself published seven - the first in 1560, the last in 1584. Between his death and the year 1630 ten more complete editions were published, the most famous of which is the folio of 1609. A copy of this presented by Sainte-Beuve to Victor Hugo, and later in the possession of Maxime du Camp, has a place of its own in French literary history. The work of Claude Binet in 1586, Discours de la vie de Pierre de Ronsard, is very important for early information, and the author seems to have revised some of Ronsard's work under the poet's own direction. From 1630 Ronsard was not again reprinted for more than two centuries. Just before the close of the second, however, Sainte-Beuve printed a selection of his poems to accompany the above-mentioned Tableau (1828). There are also selections, Choix de poésies - publiées par A. Noël (in the Collection Didot) and Becq de Fouquières. In 1857 Prosper Blanchemain, who had previously published a volume of Œuvres inédites de Ronsard, undertook a complete edition for the Bibliothèque Elzévirienne, in eight volumes. It is practically complete; a few pieces of a somewhat free character which are ascribed with some certainty to the poet are, however, excluded. A later and better edition still is that of Marty-Laveaux (1887–1893), and another that of Benjamin Pifteau (1891). Notes[edit] ^ This was under the tutelage of a certain "le seigneur Paul" who read passages to Ronsard daily from Homer and Virgil. See Charles Graves, Lyrics of Ronsard, London: Oliver and Boyd, 1967. p. 11. ^ Charles Graves, Lyrics of Ronsard, London: Oliver and Boyd, 1967, p. 12. ^ The French court, and indeed all French society, was just then much interested in literary questions, and a curious story is told of the rivalry that ensued. Mellin de Saint-Gelais, it is said, the chief of the "École Marotique" and a poet of no small merit, took up Ronsard's book and read part of it in a more or less designedly burlesque fashion before the king. It may be observed that if he did so it was a distinctly rash and uncourtier-like act, inasmuch as, from Ronsard's father's position in the royal household, the poet was personally known and liked both by Henry and by his family." At any rate, Marguerite de Valois, the king's sister, afterwards duchess of Savoy, is said to have snatched the book from Saint-Gelais and insisted on reading it herself, with the result of general applause. Henceforward, if not before, his acceptance as a poet was not doubtful, and indeed the tradition of his having to fight his way against cabals is almost entirely unsupported. References[edit]  This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Ronsard, Pierre de". Encyclopædia Britannica. 23 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 691–693. Further reading[edit] General[edit] Hennigfeld, Ursula: Der ruinierte Körper: Petrarkistische Sonette in transkultureller Perspektive Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2008. Criticism[edit] Sainte-Beuve, articles in the Causeries du lundi. F. L. Lucas, "The Prince of Court-Poets", an essay on Ronsard in Studies French and English (London, 1934), pp. 76–114. (Online. Revised edition 1950; reprinted in The Cassell Miscellany (London, 1958). External links[edit] Wikimedia Commons has media related to Pierre de Ronsard. Wikiquote has quotations related to: Pierre de Ronsard Biography, Bibliography, Analysis (in French) Podcast: Audio reading of the poem «Je n'ai plus que les os» (in French) Background and digital facsimiles of rare editions of Ronsard's works At the University of Virginia's Gordon Collection Works by or about Pierre de Ronsard at Internet Archive Works by Pierre de Ronsard at LibriVox (public domain audiobooks) Authority control BIBSYS: 90053895 BNE: XX1073992 BNF: cb11922538t (data) CANTIC: a11420492 CiNii: DA01059166 GND: 118602519 ISNI: 0000 0001 2101 7491 LCCN: n79026804 LNB: 000050003 MBA: f14a2821-6bef-41c9-bf8a-d298ce789a3c NDL: 00454592 NKC: jn19990007128 NLA: 35460882 NLG: 119605 NLI: 000613498 NLK: KAC201811426 NSK: 000033209 NTA: 068453671 RERO: 02-A003758771 SELIBR: 207615 SNAC: w66d5txr SUDOC: 027107957 Trove: 960935 ULAN: 500291216 VcBA: 495/22273 VIAF: 61551687 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n79026804 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pierre_de_Ronsard&oldid=993295233" Categories: 1524 births 1585 deaths People from Loir-et-Cher University of Paris alumni French poets Prince des poètes French fantasy writers Sonneteers 16th-century male writers 16th-century French poets French male poets Hidden categories: Articles with short description Short description matches Wikidata Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica with Wikisource reference Wikipedia articles incorporating text from the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica Commons link is on Wikidata Articles with French-language sources (fr) Articles with Internet Archive links Articles with LibriVox links Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CANTIC identifiers Wikipedia articles with CINII identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with LNB identifiers Wikipedia articles with MusicBrainz identifiers Wikipedia articles with NDL identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLG identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLI identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NSK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with RERO identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SNAC-ID identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with Trove identifiers Wikipedia articles with ULAN identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers AC with 26 elements Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikiquote Wikisource Languages العربية تۆرکجه Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ Български Brezhoneg Català Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français Galego 한국어 Հայերեն Hrvatski Bahasa Indonesia Italiano עברית Latina Magyar Македонски مازِرونی Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Polski Português Română Русский Slovenčina Slovenščina کوردی Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Türkçe Українська Tiếng Việt Walon West-Vlams 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 9 December 2020, at 21:41 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1077 ---- Cosmetics in ancient Rome - Wikipedia Cosmetics in ancient Rome From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Cosmetae applying cosmetics to a wealthy Roman woman. Cosmetics, first used in ancient Rome for ritual purposes,[1] were part of daily life for women, especially prostitutes and the wealthy. Some fashionable cosmetics, such as those imported from Germany, Gaul and China, were so expensive that the Lex Oppia tried to limit their use in 189 BCE.[2] These "designer brands" spawned cheap knock-offs that were sold to poorer women.[3] Working-class women could afford the cheaper varieties, but may not have had the time (or slaves) to apply the makeup[4] as the use of makeup was a time-consuming affair because cosmetics needed to be reapplied several times a day due to weather conditions and poor composition.[5] Cosmetics were applied in private, usually in a small room where men did not enter. Cosmetae, female slaves that adorned their mistresses, were especially praised for their skills.[6] They would beautify their mistresses with cultus, the Latin word encompassing makeup, perfume and jewelry.[7] Scent was also an important factor of beauty. Women who smelled good were presumed to be healthy. Due to the stench of many of the ingredients used in cosmetics at the time, women often drenched themselves in copious amounts of perfume.[8] Christian women tended to avoid cosmetics with the belief that they should praise what God gave them.[9] Some men, especially cross-dressers, did use cosmetics, although it was viewed as effeminate and improper.[10] All cosmetic ingredients were also used as medicines to treat various ailments. Lead, although known to be poisonous, was still widely used.[7] Contents 1 Men's attitudes 2 Skincare 3 Rouge 4 Eye makeup 5 Lips, nails and teeth 6 Perfume 7 Containers and mirrors 8 Prostitutes 9 Men's use 10 See also 11 References 12 External links Men's attitudes[edit] Roman attitudes towards cosmetics evolved with the expansion of the empire. The assortment of cosmetics available increased as trade borders expanded and the resulting influx of wealth granted women additional slaves and time to spend on beauty. Ideas of beauty from conquered peoples, especially the Greeks and Egyptians, greatly influenced the Roman paradigm of beauty.[10] Unlike their eastern trading partners however, the Romans felt that only the "preservation of beauty" was acceptable and not "unnatural embellishment". Despite exaggerating their makeup to make it appear in the poor lighting of the time, women still wanted to appear natural as a sign of chastity. Artificiality denoted a desire to be seductive, which made men question for whom exactly a woman was trying to appear attractive. This was why men generally viewed the use of cosmetics as deceitful and manipulative.[11] Vestal Virgins did not don makeup because they were supposed to look holy and chaste. Postumia, one of the Vestal Virgins, defied this convention and consequently, was accused of incestum.[12] Of all the surviving texts mentioning cosmetics (all written by men) Ovid is alone in his approval of their use. The consensus was that women who used cosmetics in excess were immoral and deceptive and were practicing a form of witchcraft. Juvenal wrote that "a woman buys scents and lotions with adultery in mind" and mocked the need for cosmetics, believing that they were ineffective. Use of perfumes was further looked down upon because they were thought to mask the smell of sex and alcohol. Seneca advised virtuous women to avoid cosmetics, as he believed their use to be a part of the decline of morality in Rome. Stoics were also against the use of cosmetics, as they were opposed to the usage of all man-made luxuries. Although there are no surviving texts written by women expounding the attitude of women towards cosmetics, their widespread use indicates that women accepted and enjoyed these products.[2] Skincare[edit] Pure white skin, a demarcation of the leisure class, was the most important feature of Roman beauty.[7] Native Roman women weren’t naturally fair-skinned and spent their time outside with oils on their faces, requiring whitening makeup to fit their model of beauty.[13] Women would often prepare their faces with beauty masks prior to applying makeup. One recipe called for the application of sweat from sheep's wool (lanolin) to the face before bedtime,[14] emitting a stench often criticized by men.[15] Other ingredients included juice, seeds, horns, excrement,[16] honey, plants, placenta, marrow, vinegar, bile, animal urine, sulfur, vinegar,[6] eggs, myrrh, incense, frankincense,[17] ground oyster shells,[18] onions with poultry fat, white lead, and barley with vetch. Bathing in asses’ milk was an expensive treatment that worked like a chemical peel and was used by wealthy women such as Cleopatra VII and Poppaea Sabina.[19] After their baths, they would then apply face whitener, such as chalk powder,[20] white marl, crocodile dung and white lead.[7] The Roman recognition that lead was poisonous underscored their point of view on how important white skin was. Other ingredients used in whiteners included beeswax, olive oil, rosewater, saffron,[3] animal fat, tin oxide, starch,[21] rocket (arugula), cucumber, anise, mushrooms, honey, rose leaves, poppies, myrrh, frankincense,[7] almond oil, rosewater, lily root, water parsnip and eggs.[8] The Romans disliked wrinkles, freckles, sunspots, skin flakes and blemishes.[6] To soften wrinkles, they used swans’ fat, asses’ milk, gum Arabic and bean-meal.[7] Sores and freckles were treated with the ashes of snails.[7] The Romans pasted soft leather patches of alum directly over blemishes to pretend that they were beauty marks. Criminals and freedmen used these leather patches, which came in both round and crescent shapes, to conceal brand marks.[8] With the exception of hair on her head, hair was considered to be unattractive on a Roman woman. Consequently, women removed hair by either shaving, plucking, stripping using a resin paste, or scraping with a pumice stone. Older women faced ridicule for their depilation because it was viewed primarily as preparation for sex.[22] Rouge[edit] Although Romans esteemed pale faces, a light pink on the cheeks was considered to be attractive, signifying good health. Plutarch wrote that too much rouge made a woman look showy, while Martial mocked women, believing that rouge was in danger of melting in the sun.[4] Sources of rouge included Tyrian vermillion,[10] rose and poppy petals, fucus,[23] red chalk, alkanet, and crocodile dung.[24] Red ochre, a more expensive blush, was imported from Belgium and ground against a stone into powder.[17] Despite a widespread knowledge that cinnabar and red lead were poisonous, they were both still used extensively.[7] Cheap alternatives included mulberry juice and wine dregs.[8] Eye makeup[edit] Roman glass perfume flask and two-part eye makeup container. The ideal eyes, from the Roman perspective, were large with long eyelashes. Pliny the Elder wrote that eyelashes fell out from sexual excess, and so it was especially important for women to keep their eyelashes long to prove their chastity.[25] Kohl was the main ingredient in eye makeup, and was composed of ashes or soot and antimony, with saffron usually added to improve the smell. Kohl was applied using a rounded stick, made of ivory, glass, bone, or wood, that would be dipped in either oil or water first, before being used to apply the kohl.[7] The use of kohl as makeup came from the east. In addition to kohl, charred rose petals[26] and date stones could be used to darken the eyes.[8] Colored eyeshadow was also applied by women to accentuate their eyes. Green eyeshadow came from malachite, while blue came from azurite.[3] The Romans preferred dark eyebrows that almost met in the center.[7] This effect was achieved by darkening their eyebrows with antimony or soot and then extending them inward.[3] Plucking began in the 1st century BCE to tidy their overall look.[4] Lips, nails and teeth[edit] Although evidence for the usage of lipstick appears in earlier civilizations, no such evidence has materialized to indicate that the Romans ever colored their lips.[27] The only evidence for painting nails comes from a red dye they imported that was produced from an Indian insect. Generally only the wealthy cut their nails, as they used barbers to clip their nails short, following the contemporary practice for good hygiene.[7] Although oral hygiene was nowhere near today’s standards, white teeth were prized by the Romans, and so false teeth, made from bone, ivory and paste, were popular items. Ovid shed light on the way white teeth were viewed in society when he wrote the statement, "You can do yourself untold damage when you laugh if your teeth are black, too long or irregular."[4] The Romans also sweetened their breath with powder and baking soda.[6] Perfume[edit] Roman perfume bottles (unguentari) on display at Villa Boscoreale Perfumes were very popular in Ancient Rome. In fact, they were so heavily used that Cicero claimed that, "The right scent for a woman is none at all."[4] They came in liquid, solid and sticky forms and were often created in a maceration process with flowers or herbs and oil.[5] Distillation technology, as well as most of the imported ingredients, originated in the east.[6] The most prominent perfume market in Italy was Seplasia in Capua.[15] Perfumes were rubbed on or poured onto the user and were often believed to be helpful against different ailments, such as fever and indigestion. Different scents were appropriate for different occasions,[10] as well as for men and women.[28] Deodorants made from alum, iris and rose petals were common.[29] In addition to personal use, perfumes were used in food and to freshen the household aroma.[5] Containers and mirrors[edit] Makeup usually came in tablet or cake form, sold at marketplaces.[7] Wealthy women bought expensive makeup that came in elaborate containers made from gold, wood, glass or bone.[6] Kohl came in compartmentalized tubes that could store more than one color of eye makeup.[7] Glassblowing, invented in the 1st century CE in Syria, lowered the price of containers. The most common color for glass was teal.[2] Gladiator sweat and fats of the animals fighting in the arena were sold in souvenir pots outside of the games to improve complexion.[3] Mirrors in Ancient Rome were mostly hand mirrors made from polished metal, or mercury behind glass.[4] Spending too much time in front of a mirror was thought to denote that a woman was weak in character.[13] Prostitutes[edit] Further information: Prostitution in ancient Rome Cosmetics, and especially their overuse, were commonly associated with prostitutes, both being regarded as immoral and seductive. The Latin word lenocinium actually meant both "prostitution" and "makeup". Due to their low income, prostitutes tended to use cheaper cosmetics, which emitted rather foul odors.[30] This, combined with the strong, exotic scents used to cover up the stench, made brothels smell especially rank. As prostitutes aged, with their income dependent on their appearance, they opted for more copious amounts of makeup. Courtesans often received cosmetics and perfumes as gifts or partial payment.[27] Men's use[edit] Men are also known to have used cosmetics in Roman times, although it was frowned upon by society. Men seen carrying mirrors were viewed as effeminate, while those using face-whitening makeup were thought to be immoral because they were expected to be tanned from working outside.[31] Two of the more acceptable practices were the light use of certain perfumes and moderate hair removal. A man removing too much hair was viewed as effeminate, while removing too little made him seem unrefined.[13] The Romans found it especially inappropriate for an emperor to be vain, as was apparently the case with the Emperor Otho.[32] The Emperor Elagabalus removed all of his body hair and often donned makeup, which caused the Romans much grief.[33] See also[edit] Medicamina Faciei Femineae, by Ovid, a singular didactic poem for the female face, whose methods are still used in the manufacture of cosmetics and pharmaceuticals today.[34] References[edit] ^ An Ancient Roman Make-up Lesson The History Channel. Retrieved 2009-10-29. ^ a b c Stewart, Susan. Cosmetics & Perfumes in the Roman World. Gloucestershire: Tempus, 2007, pp. 123-136. ^ a b c d e Ancient cosmetics brought to life BBC News. Retrieved 2009-10-29. ^ a b c d e f Cowell, F.R. Everyday Life in Ancient Rome. London: Batsford, 1961, pp. 63-66. ^ a b c Stewart, Susan. Cosmetics & Perfumes in the Roman World. Gloucestershire: Tempus, 2007, pp. 9-13. ^ a b c d e f A Brief History of Cosmetics in Roman Times Archived 2014-02-23 at the Wayback Machine Life in Italy. Retrieved 2009-10-29. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Olson, Kelly. Dress and the Roman Woman. New York: Routledge, 2008, pp. 61-70. ^ a b c d e Stewart, Susan. Cosmetics & Perfumes in the Roman World. Gloucestershire: Tempus, 2007, pp. 32-60. ^ Tertullian, De cultu feminarum, 2.5. ^ a b c d Angeloglou, Maggie. A History of Make-up. London: Studio Vista, 1970, pp. 30-32 ^ Achilles Tatius. Leucippe and Cleitophon. 2.38.2-3. ^ Livy, History of Rome Archived 2009-10-02 at the Wayback Machine, 4.44.11. ^ a b c Stewart, Susan. Cosmetics & Perfumes in the Roman World. Gloucestershire: Tempus, 2007, pp. 82-95. ^ Ovid, The Art of Love. 3.213-14. ^ a b Balsdon, J.P.D.V. "Roman Women: Their History and Habits". London: Bodley Head, 1962, p. 261. ^ Ovid, The Art of Love., 3.270. ^ a b Ovid, The Art of Beauty. ^ Pliny the Elder, Natural History, 32.65. ^ Pliny the Elder, Natural History, 11.238. ^ Horace, Epodes, 12.10. ^ Roman cosmetic secrets revealed BBC News. Retrieved 2009-10-29. ^ Martial. 12.32.21-2, 10.90. ^ Pliny the Elder. Natural History, 26.103. ^ Horace, Epodes, 12.10-11. ^ Pliny the Elder, Natural History, 11.154. ^ Pliny the Elder, Natural History, 21,123, 35.194. ^ a b Stewart, Susan. Cosmetics & Perfumes in the Roman World. Gloucestershire: Tempus, 2007, pp. 111-114. ^ Athenaeus, Deipnosophistae, 15.684. ^ Pliny the Elder, Natural History, 21.142, 35.185, 21.121. ^ Seneca, Controversiae, 2.21. ^ Ovid, The Art of Love. 1.513. ^ Juvenal, Satires, 2.99-101. ^ Cassius Dio, Roman History 80.14.4. ^ Peter Green, (Autumn, 1979). "Ars Gratia Cultus: Ovid as Beautician". American Journal of Philology (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press) 100 (3):pp. 390-1. External links[edit] The History Channel: An Ancient Roman Make-up Lesson Video demonstration Ovid's "The Art of Beauty" A Brief History of Cosmetics in Roman Times BBC News: Ancient cosmetics brought to life BBC News: Roman cosmetic secrets revealed v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cosmetics_in_ancient_Rome&oldid=984168191" Categories: History of cosmetics Ancient Roman culture Hidden categories: Webarchive template wayback links Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages العربية Русский Українська 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 18 October 2020, at 16:18 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1103 ---- Category:Latin-language writers - Wikipedia Help Category:Latin-language writers From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search History portal Wikimedia Commons has media related to Writers in Latin. This category contains people who lived during the period of the Roman Republic and/or the Roman Empire and who wrote in the Latin language. Contents Top 0–9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Subcategories This category has the following 12 subcategories, out of 12 total.   ► Latin-language writers by period‎ (7 C) B ► Roman-era biographers‎ (7 P) D ► Ancient Roman dramatists and playwrights‎ (2 C) G ► Roman-era geographers‎ (1 C, 11 P) H ► Latin historians‎ (2 C, 50 P) L ► Latin commentators on Aristotle‎ (37 P) ► Latin writers by century‎ (19 C) ► Latin writers known only from secondary sources‎ (23 P) ► Latin letter writers‎ (6 C, 62 P) P ► Roman-era poets‎ (6 C, 81 P) R ► Roman military writers‎ (9 P) W ► Works by ancient Latin writers‎ (16 C) Pages in category "Latin-language writers" The following 116 pages are in this category, out of 116 total. This list may not reflect recent changes (learn more). A Andrzej Abrek Luc d'Achery Aelius Festus Aphthonius Girolamo Aleandro, the younger Alcimus Alethius Alfenus Varus Alphius Avitus Livius Andronicus Jean-Baptiste-Gaspard d'Ansse de Villoison Marcus Antistius Labeo Quintus Antistius Labeo Arnobius Alfonso Clemente de Aróstegui Giuseppe Simone Assemani B Étienne Baluze Frang Bardhi Caesius Bassus Vitus Bering (1617–1675) Pere Antoni Beuter Hieronymus de Bosch C Aulus Caecina Severus (writer) Eliseo Calenzio Martianus Capella Gaius Cassius Parmensis Aulus Cornelius Celsus Censorinus Elio Lampridio Cerva Émile Chatelain Appius Claudius Caecus Columella Robert Constantin Cornelius Labeo Cornelius Severus Cornificia Aulus Cremutius Cordus D Ferdinand de Meeûs Dezallier d'Argenville Sebastiano Dolci Double Heroides André du Laurens Ignjat Đurđević E Ennius Johann Heinrich Ernesti Eucolpius F Fenestella Nigidius Figulus Siculus Flaccus Frontinus G Aulus Gellius Vlaho Getaldić Conrad Goclenius Grattius Hyginus Gromaticus H Aulus Hirtius Moritz Hohenbaum van der Meer Horace J Julius Caesar Julius Honorius Gaius Julius Hyginus Juvenal L Attius Labeo Decimus Laberius Josse Le Plat Jean Liebault Lucan M Aodh Buidhe Mac an Bhaird Licinius Macer Macrobius Malachy of Ireland Marcus Manilius Claude-Sixte Sautreau de Marsy Manuel Martí Martial Gaius Matius Marcus Minucius Felix Pedro de Morales N Aufidius Namusa Petrus Nannius Cornelius Nepos O Julius Obsequens Ovid P Rutilius Taurus Aemilianus Palladius Matteo Palmieri Master Patrick of Ireland Pelagonius Gabriel Pereira de Castro Persius Phaedrus (fabulist) Plautus Pliny the Younger Pliny the Younger on Christians Pontius of Carthage Michel de Pure Q Quintilian R Jean Racine Remigius of Lyon Publius Rutilius Rufus André du Ryer S Francisco Sánchez Barbero Scribonius Largus Seneca the Younger Statius Sulpicia Sulpicia (satirist) Symphosius Publilius Syrus T Terence Tibullus Titus Quinctius Atta Plotius Tucca U Aggenus Urbicus V Marcus Terentius Varro Gaius Marius Victorinus Joaquín Lorenzo Villanueva Virgil Vitruvius Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Latin-language_writers&oldid=952583522" Categories: Latin-language literature Writers by language Ancient writers Hidden categories: Commons category link is on Wikidata Template Category TOC via CatAutoTOC on category with 101–200 pages CatAutoTOC generates standard Category TOC Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Category Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikiquote Languages العربية Aragonés Asturianu Azərbaycanca বাংলা Башҡортса Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ Brezhoneg Буряад Català Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français Gàidhlig Galego 한국어 Italiano עברית Қазақша Latina Latviešu Magyar Nederlands Norsk bokmål Norsk nynorsk Occitan Picard Piemontèis Português Română Русский Sardu Scots Slovenščina کوردی Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska தமிழ் Taqbaylit Татарча/tatarça Türkçe Українська اردو Tiếng Việt West-Vlams 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 23 April 2020, at 00:38 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1108 ---- Tribal Assembly - Wikipedia Tribal Assembly From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Ancient Rome This article is part of a series on the politics and government of ancient Rome Periods Roman Kingdom 753–509 BC Roman Republic 509–27 BC Roman Empire 27 BC – AD 395 Principate 27 BC – AD 284 Dominate AD 284–641 Western AD 395–476 Eastern AD 395–1453 Timeline Roman Constitution Constitution of the Kingdom Constitution of the Republic Constitution of the Empire Constitution of the Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Executive magistrates Precedent and law Roman law Ius Imperium Mos maiorum Collegiality Auctoritas Roman citizenship Cursus honorum Senatus consultum Senatus consultum ultimum Assemblies Centuriate Curiate Plebeian Tribal Ordinary magistrates Consul Praetor Quaestor Promagistrate Aedile Tribune Censor Governor Extraordinary magistrates Corrector Dictator Magister equitum Consular tribune Rex Triumviri Decemviri Titles and honours Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Praeses Praefectus Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Other countries v t e The Tribal Assembly (comitia populi tributa) was an assembly consisting of all Roman citizens convened by tribes (tribus). In the Roman Republic, citizens did not elect legislative representatives. Instead, they voted themselves on legislative matters in the popular assemblies (the comitia centuriata, the tribal assembly and the plebeian council). Bills were proposed by magistrates and the citizens only exercised their right to vote. In the Tribal Assembly, citizens were organized on the basis of 35 tribes: four urban tribes of the citizens in the city of Rome, and 31 rural tribes of citizens outside the city. Each tribe voted separately and one after the other. In each tribe, decisions were made by majority vote and its decision counted as one vote regardless of how many electors each tribe held. Once a majority of tribes voted in the same way on a given measure, the voting ended and the matter was decided.[1] The Tribal Assembly was chaired by a magistrate, usually a consul or a praetor. The presiding magistrate made all decisions on matters of procedure and legality. His power over the assembly could be nearly absolute. One check on his power came in the form of vetoes by other magistrates. Also, any decision made by a presiding magistrate could be vetoed by the plebeian tribunes. The Tribal Assembly elected the quaestors, and the curule aediles.[2] It conducted trials for non-capital punishment cases. However, the Roman Dictator Lucius Cornelius Sulla reassigned this to special jury courts (quaestiones perpetuae) in 82 BC.[citation needed] There are disagreements among modern historians regarding the number and nature of the tribal assembly (see below). Contents 1 Definitions of types assemblies 2 Disagreements on the number and nature of tribal assemblies 3 Assembly procedures 4 Decline 5 Tribes 6 See also 7 References 8 Notes 9 Further reading 10 External links Definitions of types assemblies[edit] The Romans distinguished between two types of assemblies, the comitia (or comitatus) and the contio (contracted from conventio). The word comitia (going together), which was the plural of comitium (a purpose-built meeting place), referred to assemblies convened to make decisions on legislative or judicial matters or to hold elections. The word contio (coming together) referred to meetings where 'nothing was legally enacted'. They were convened to hear public announcements and pronouncements, speeches and debates, witness the interrogation of someone accused of in a trial and to watch executions. Opinions expressed in a contio did not have any legal validity.[3] The tribal assembly was a comitia. Private citizens who did not hold political office could make speeches in a contio, but not before a comitia or a concilium.[4] Voters always assembled first in a contio to hear debates or to enable canvassing by electoral candidates before voting. The actual voting took place in a comitia or concilium (for this term, see below).[5] Gellius wrote about a further distinction between comita and concilium, which he based on a quote from a passage written by Laelius Felix, an early second century AD jurist: He who orders not the entire people (populus) but some part thereof to be present ought to proclaim not a comitia, but a concilium. Moreover, the [plebeian] tribunes neither summon patricians nor have the power to propose anything to them. Thus, measures which were accepted on the proposal of the plebeian tribunes are not properly called laws (leges) but plebiscites. Patricians were not bound by these bills until the dictator Quintus Hortensius [287 BC] carried that law whereby all the Quirites (the Roman people) were bound by whatever the plebs had determined.[6] This has been taken as referring to the assembly which was reserved for the plebeians (or plebs, the commoners), thus excluding the patricians (the aristocracy), and which was convened by the tribunes of the plebs (also called by modern historians plebeian tribunes) – see plebeian council. Since the meetings of the plebs excluded the patricians, they were not considered as representing the whole of the Roman people and because of this, according to Laelius Felix, the term concilium applied to them. By contrast, the term comitia applied to assemblies which represented the whole of the Roman people. Measures passed by assemblies of the whole citizen body were called leges (laws), whereas those passed only by the plebeians were called plebiscites (resolutions of the plebs). Until the lex Hortensia passed by Quintus Hortensius in 287 BC, the patricians refused to accept the plebiscites as being binding on them on the ground that, because of their exclusion, did not apply to the whole of the people.[7] Disagreements on the number and nature of tribal assemblies[edit] Chart showing the checks and balances of the constitution of the Roman Republic Andrew Lintott notes that many modern historians follow Theodor Mommsen's view that during the Roman Republic there were two assemblies of the tribes and that the ancient sources used the term comitia tributa with reference both of them. One was the assembly by the tribes which was used for plebeian meetings to which the patricians were excluded and which was convened by the plebeian tribunes. The other assembly based on the tribes was convened by the Roman consuls or the praetors and was an assembly of the whole of the Roman people (both patricians and plebeians). However, the ancient sources did not have a differentiation in terminology for the two of them and used the term comitia tributa for both.[8] Many modern historians use the term comitia tributa or comitia populi tributa (comitia tributa of the people) to indicate meetings by the tribes which involved the whole of the Roman people (populus) and the term concilium plebis or concilium plebis tributum (plebeian council by the tribes) for assemblies based on the tribes which were exclusively for the plebeians. However, they are not found in the ancient Roman literature related to the Roman Republic. Therefore, they denote a distinction which can be disputed. It is based on the text by Gellius quoted above. Lintott notes that some modern historians reject the comitia tributa/concilium plebis distinction and the use of the quote by Gellius as its basis. They argue that this terminology is a convention established by modern historians which ancient writers did not make and that there was no assembly based on tribes other than the one where the plebeians met to vote and which was presided over by the plebeian tribunes, who submitted bills to its vote. References to laws which were submitted to the comitia tributa by the consuls in the ancient literature must have pertained to bills they presented to the comitia centuriata (the assembly of the soldiers, another voting assembly), a deviation from correct procedure found in the late Republic or instances in which these officials got the plebeian tribunes to propose bills for them.[9][10][11] Lintott disagrees with the notion that there was only one assembly based on the tribes, which was the one of the plebeians. He notes that there are examples in which laws were proposed to the comitia tributa by the consuls, who did not preside over the assembly of the plebeians. Examples of such laws are the law which increased the number of quaestors to twenty, which was attributed to Lucius Cornelius Sulla, the lex Gabinia Calpurnia de insula Delo of 58 BC and the lex Quinctia of 9 BC. Moreover, the consuls conducted the elections of the curule aediles, who were not plebeian officials, before the tribes. Therefore, it is likely that the term comitia tributa was used both for the assemblies presided over by the consuls and the praetors and the assemblies presided over by the plebeian tribunes.[12] One could add to this that Livy mentioned a comitia tributa which was convened by the consuls in 446 BC; that is, during the early Republic.[13] Forsythe presents a more recent account of the argument that the comitia tributa/concilium plebis distinction is a misplaced convention established by modern historians. He argues that it is found only in the quote by Gellius which comes from a text which was written in the imperial period; that is, after the fall of the Roman Republic and long after the assemblies of the Republic had ceased to function. This implies that Laelius Felix was not sufficiently familiar with these republican institutions. Forsythe argues that the distinctions between two assemblies based on the tribes "has no support in the extensive writings of Cicero and Livy, who must have been far more knowledgeable in these matters than Laelius Felix." Cicero lived during the late Republic. Livy was born during the late Republic and wrote a detailed history of the republican period. Forsythe also argues that the word comitia was used for formal assemblies convened 'to vote on legislative, electoral and judicial matters', and that concilium was a generic term 'for any kind of public meetings of citizens, including both comitia and contio.' His conclusion is that the mentioned distinction is an artificial modern construction with no authority in ancient texts, that 'the ancients speak only of a comitia tributa' and that it is likely that in Republican times there was a single tribal assembly known as comitia tributa.[14] According to the Roman tradition, in 494 BC, fifteen years after the overthrow of the monarchy and the establishment of the Roman Republic, the Plebeiany temporarily seceded from the city of Rome, which started the two hundred-year Conflict of the Orders between the Patricians (the aristocracy) and the Plebeians (the commoners). During this first secession, the plebeians created their own institutions which were separate from those of the Roman state, which at that time was controlled by the patricians, and were intended to protect the interests of the plebeians. These included the plebeian tribunes, the plebeian aediles and the plebeian assembly. Forsythe takes the revisionist view further. He rejects the idea there was a plebeian assembly and maintains that the comitia tributa was an assembly of the whole of the Roman people and opines that the plebeian secession was a myth created in later times. Roman historians emerged in the late third and early second century BC, some three hundred year after the date attributed to this secession and the events of Rome's early history were poorly documented. Based on T. P. Wiseman's view that many of Rome's early historical traditions 'were created, propagated, accepted and reshaped' from the middle of the fourth century BC onward through dramas played on the stage at religious festivals[15] Forsythe argues that the story of the plebeian secession was invented in one such performances to explain the origin of the temple of Ceres and its plebeian associations. It was inspired by Herodotus' account of how Telines, a ruler of Gela, a Greek town in Sicily, used the rites of Demeter and Persephone to bring back to Gela a group of political exiles. This story of civil discord, reconciliation and integration and the cult of Demeter was used to fabricate the tale of the first plebeian secession where the plebeians seceded from Rome but were then reconciled and returned to the city.[16] The Ludi Ceriales (the games of Ceres) were held annually to celebrate the anniversary of the dedication of the temple of Ceres, which was dated by the tradition two years before the first secession.[17] Assembly procedures[edit] The convening of the assembly was announced three market-days (nundinae) in advance. The viatores (messengers) were sent "to inform those in country districts" about the convening of the assembly.[18] Later, for elections it was established that there should be a trinundinum, an interval of at least three market-days between the announcement of the election and the vote of the assembly, during which no legislation was permitted. The lex Caecilia Didia of 98 BC required a trinundinum interval between the announcement of a law and the vote. In the case of prosecutions before an assembly, the magistrate who presided over it was required to give "notice (diem dicere) to the accused of the first day of the investigation (inquisitio), then at the end of each hearing he announced the adjournment to the next (diem prodicere). After this there was a trinundinum interval before the assembly voted the verdict.[19] There are disagreements among scholars about how many days this interval lasted. Mommsen proposes 24 days, Michels 25 days. Lintott gives a flexible suggestion, 17 days or more.[20][21][22] There could be only one assembly operating at a time. The augur Marcus Valerius Messalla Rufus (who was consul in 53 BC) wrote a rule book (On Auspices). Among other things, it established that lesser magistrates could not call off (avocare, call away) an assembly which had already been convened. Thus, "whoever of them first summons the people to an election has the law on his side, because it is unlawful to take the same action twice with the people nor can one minor magistrate call away an assembly from another." However, a consul could call off a comitia or contio convened by another magistrate and a praetor could call off one summoned by other magistrates except a consul. If an assembly was called "to address a contio without laying any measure before them, it is lawful for any number of magistrates to hold a contio at the same time." [23] Lintott suggests that this rule was intended to prevent rivalry among magistrates.[22] In addition to the presiding magistrate of an assembly there were several other magistrates to act as assistants. They were available to help resolve procedural disputes and to provide a mechanism for electors to appeal the decisions of the presiding magistrate.[24] Since the Romans believed that the gods communicated their approval or disapproval with proposed actions, the presiding magistrate performed augury (the divination of the omens of the gods) the night before a meeting. There were also augurs (priests who performed augury), either in attendance or on-call, who would be available to help interpret the omens of the gods.[25] The meeting could only proceed if the omens were favourable. On several known occasions, presiding magistrates used the claim of unfavourable omens as an excuse to suspend a session that was not going the way they wanted. If after the assembly the augurs decided that some formality had been neglected, its vote became void. In the case of elections, those persons had been elected to an office had to resign.[26] There were several cases in which an assembly could be adjourned. On religious grounds, this could happen, besides when the auspices were found to be unfavourable, when the gods manifested their displeasure by rain, thunder, or lightning or if the sun set before the proceedings were completed – this was because the auspices were considered to be valid only for one day from dawn to sunset. Other reasons were the veto of a plebeian tribune and one of the assembled citizens suffering an epileptic fit (morbus comitialis). In the politically volatile years of the late Republic, at times assemblies were broken up by riots. If an assembly convened as a court, its being broken up was equivalent to an acquittal of the accused.[26] On the day of the vote the tribes convened at dawn. The meeting started with a prayer, unaccompanied by sacrifice.[27] For legislative meetings the presiding magistrate was the one who proposed the bill (rogatio legis) to be voted on and after the prayer he laid his bill before the people. For electoral meetings, he announced the names of the candidates. If the meeting was for a trial, he made the people acquainted with the nature of the offence on which the people had to pass a verdict. He concluded the announcement with the words velitis, jubeatis Quirites (command your wish, citizens). A rogatio was read out by the praeco (the crier or herald). Then the contio begun. The voters were not sorted into their tribes. For legislative matters there was a debate on the rogatio in which private citizens had to ask the presiding magistrate for permission to speak. This debate took place before the bill was either vetoed or put to the vote.[26][28] If the vote was for an election, the candidates used the contio for canvassing and there were no speeches by private citizens.[29] After the above, the voters were told to break up the contio and to arrange themselves by the tribes with the formula discedite, quirites (depart to your separate groups, citizens). The tribes voted one by one. The voters assembled in enclosures called saepta[30] and voted by placing a pebble or written ballot into an appropriate jar. The baskets (cistae) that held the votes were watched by officers (the custodes) who then counted the ballots and reported the results to the presiding magistrate.[31] The majority of votes in each tribe decided how that tribe voted. The presiding magistrate (either a consul or a praetor), always ensured that all tribes had at least five members voting, and if a tribe did not, individuals from other tribes were reassigned to the vacant places in that tribe.[32] The order in which the tribes voted was determined by lot. An urn into which lots were cast was brought in. From then on, the plebeian tribunes were not allowed to exercise their right to veto.[33] The first tribe to vote was called praerogativa or principium and the result of its vote was announced immediately.[34] The tribes which voted next were called jure vocatae.[26] When a majority of tribes had voted the same way, voting ended. The results of votes of each tribe was announced in an order also determined by lot before the announcement of the final result. This announcement was called renuntiatio.[27] The praerogativa or principium was usually the most important tribe, because it often decided the matter through a bandwagon effect. It was believed that the order of the lot was chosen by the gods, and thus, that the position held by the tribes which voted earlier was the position of the gods.[35] If the voting process was not complete by nightfall, the electors were dismissed and the voting had to begin again the next day.[36] Laws passed by the comitia took effect as soon as the results were announced.[27] It has been speculated that the word suffragium (vote) indicates that in the early days the men in the assembly made a crash with their arms to signal approval, rather than vote. Another speculation is that the term rogatores (sing. rogator, a teller, an official who asked the people for their votes or collected votes) indicates that in later times, but before the introduction of the written ballot, the assembled men were asked to express their votes verbally and that this was recorded with marks inscribed in tablets. However, there is no evidence for either of these. The written ballot was introduced by a series of laws, the lex Gabinia tabellaria (139 BC) for elections, the lex Cassia tebellaria (137 BC) for non-capital punishment trials, the lex Papiria (131 BC) for legislation, and the lex Coelia (106 BC) for capital punishment trials (which were conducted before the comitia centuriata). This was an introduction of secret ballots which reduced undue influence or intimidation by the powerful elites, which was at times a problem during votes.[37] Although the order of voting was determined by lot, there was also an official order of the tribes, known as the ordo tribuum. The first four tribes were the urban tribes, in the order: Suburana, Palatina, Esquilina, Collina. The rural tribes followed, concluding with Aniensis. Crawford postulates that the rustic tribes were enumerated along the major roads leading from Rome (the Viae Ostiensis, Appia, Latina, Praenestina, Valeria, Salaria, Flaminia and Clodia), in a counter-clockwise order: Romilia, Voltinia, Voturia, Aemilia, Horatia, Maecia, Scaptia, Pomptina, Falerina, Lemonia, Papiria, Ufentina, Terentina, Pupinia, Menenia, Publilia, Cornelia, Claudia, Camilia, Aniensis, Fabia, Pollia, Sergia, Clustumina, Quirina, Velina, Stellatina, Tromentina, Galeria, Sabatina, Arniensis. This list omits the tribus Popillia, one of the earlier tribes.[38] The location of the meetings of the Tribal Assembly varied. Up to 145 BC were centred on comitium, a templum an open-air space, built for public meetings at the north end of the Roman Forum. The rostra, a speaking platform on its southern side of the comitium, was used for speeches. It was also used as a tribunal; that is, as a platform to deliver the votes. Then this place became too cramped and the steps of the Temple of Castor and Pollux at the forum's south-east end were used as the tribunal. Elevated gangways (pontes) which provided access to it were built by the second century BC. Meetings were also sometimes held in the area Capitolina, an open space in front and around the temple of Jupiter Optimus Maximus, on the southern summit of the Capitoline Hill. In the late Republic the meetings were held outside the city walls, at the Campus Martius (the Field of Mars) a large flat area which could accommodate the simultaneous voting of the tribes and thus speed up the process.[39] Decline[edit] In the politically volatile and highly corrupt final years of the Roman Republic, the popular assemblies were susceptible to corruption and vulnerable to politically motivated violence by contenting political factions. The establishment of the Second Triumvirate in 43 BC effective abolished the functions of the comitia, as the triumvirs were granted authority by the lex Titia to appoint practically all offices without consulting the senate or the people.[40] Some actions were still passed using the assemblies, with certain laws providing for the erection of temples, the remission of rents in 41 BC, and the lex Falcidia governing inheritance in 40 BC;[40] similarly, various laws granting the triumvirs the right to wear the civic crown[40] were passed by plebiscite, as it would have been unseemly for them to simply have granted themselves those honours.[40] With the establishment of absolute rule by emperors after the fall of the Republic, the Republican assemblies were emasculated. Augustus, the first Roman emperor, became the real legislator and the comitia's role in passing laws became only a ceremonial one. He also removed the comitia's judicial functions, though these functions had fallen into disuse long before.[41] This assembly's electoral functions also become only nominal, with the assemblies effectively being dominated by the emperor.[42] Augustus filled half of the magistracies with his own candidates, though the magistracies as a whole had, by this point, so little political importance that imperial control over elections was minimal.[42] His successor, Tiberius transferred the comitia's remaining electoral authority to the senate.[42] Although the emperors received many of their powers from the comitia tributa, this was only a formality. The comitia tributa continued to exist until the third century AD, but its remaining functions were only symbolic. It took auspices and gave prayer. It conferred the emperor's legislative powers and other authority only in a ceremonial manner. It proclaimed the laws presented to it for approval by acclamatio, rather than a real vote.[27] Tribes[edit] Main article: Roman tribe The 35 tribes were not ethnic or kinship groups, but geographic divisions into which Roman citizens were distributed. They were administrative districts which served for the purposes of taxation, the military levy and for the registration of Roman citizens. This registration occurred regularly during the census and the names of citizens and their families were entered in the registers of the tribes. Lintott notes that 'the tribe was the critical indicator of Roman citizenship' for the adult sons of Roman fathers and also for 'those incorporated into the citizen body from the outside'. A man who came of age was enrolled as a new adult in the tribe of his father and could change it only through adoption into another family. Inhabitants of Italic towns who were incorporated into the Roman state by being given Roman citizenship were also registered in tribes. Consequently, "the tribe might therefore, came to bear little relationship to the whereabouts of the citizen's domicile or property." [43] With regard to the tribal assembly, the tribes were its voting districts. Each tribe had further subdivisions, which in the urban tribes were called vici (sing. vicus, in an urban context it meant neighbourhood) and in the rural tribes were called pagi (sing. pagus – which were rural sub-districts with a number of vici (which in a rural context meant villages and hamlets) and had a fortress. Professional guilds (collegia), were organised along tribal lines. The tribes were originally presided over by tribuni aerarii (tribunes of the public treasury) who had the tribal register and collected the property tax and paid the soldiers registered in the tribe.[44] Later this title became obsolete and the heads of the tribes were called curatores tribuum.[45] Besides these curatores there were also the divisores tribuum who were treasurers. These two types of officials probably had their own registers; the curatores were involved in the census.[8] By the late republic, their main task was to distribute bribes. Because tribal membership was re-registered once every five years in each census, it became possible to crudely gerrymander the tribes. While land could never be taken away from a tribe, the "censors" had the power to allocate new lands to existing tribes as a part of the Census. Thus, the censors had the power to apportion tribes in a manner that might be advantageous to them or to their partisans.[32] See also[edit] Roman tribe Pagus Vicus Collegia Roman censor Centuriate Assembly Plebeian Council Curiate Assembly References[edit] Abbott, Frank Frost (1901). A History and Description of Roman Political Institutions. Elibron Classics (ISBN 0-543-92749-0). Byrd, Robert (1995). The Senate of the Roman Republic. U.S. Government Printing Office, Senate Document 103-23. Cicero, Marcus Tullius (1841). The Political Works of Marcus Tullius Cicero: Comprising his Treatise on the Commonwealth; and his Treatise on the Laws. Translated from the original, with Dissertations and Notes in Two Volumes. By Francis Barham, Esq. London: Edmund Spettigue. Vol. 1. Harper's Dictionary of Classical Antiquities, Second Edition, Harry Thurston Peck, Editor (1897): Comitia [1] Lintott, Andrew, "The Constitution of the Roman Republic" Oxford University Press, USA; new edition 2003; ISBN 978-0199261086 Taylor, Lily Ross (1966). Roman Voting Assemblies: From the Hannibalic War to the Dictatorship of Caesar (Thomas Spencer Jerome Lectures), William Morrow, 1965; new edition by University of Michigan Press, 1991; ISBN 9780472081257 Taylor, L. R., Voting Districts of the Roman Republic: The Thirty-Five, Urban and Rural Tribes (Papers and Monographs of the American Academy in Rome), University of Michigan Press, Revised edition, 2013; ISBN 978-0472118694 Smith, W., Wayte, W., Marindin, G. E., (Eds), A Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities (1890): Tribus [2] Notes[edit] ^ Taylor, L. R., Roman Voting Assemblies, p. 40 ^ Taylor, L. R., Roman Voting Assemblies, p. 7 ^ Lintott, A.,The Constitution of the Roman Republic, p. 42 ^ Abbott, F. F., A History and Description of Roman Political Institutions, p. 252 ^ Taylor,L. R., Roman Voting Assemblies, p. 2 ^ Gellius, Attic Nights, 15.27.4 ^ Botsford, George Willis (1909). The Roman Assembly. New York: Cooper Square Publishers Inc. p. 330. ^ a b Lintott, A., The Constitution of the Roman Republic, p. 53 ^ Botsford, George Willis (1909). The Roman Assemblies. New York: Cooper Square Publishers Inc. p. 119. ^ Develin, E., Comitia Tributa Plebis', Athenaeum (1975) 53, pp. 302–37; "'Comitia Tributa Again', Athenaeum (1977) 55, pp. 425–6 ^ Sandberg, K., The Concilium Plebis as a Legislative Body', in Paanen, U., et al, Senatus Populesque Romanus: Studies in Roman Republican Legislation, (Acta Inst. Rom. Fin 13) (1993), pp. 74–96 ^ Lintott, A., The Constitution of the Roman Republic, pp. 54–55 ^ Livy, The History of Rome, 3.71 ^ Forsythe, G., A critical History of Early Rome, pp. 180–81 ^ Wiseman, T. P., Remus, a Roman Myth (1995), p. 129 ^ Forsythe, G., A Critical History of Early Rome, pp. 172–75 ^ Dionysius of Halicanassus, Roman Antiquities, 6.17.3 ^ Appian, The Civil Wars, 1.29 ^ Lintott, A.,The Constitution of the Roman Republic, pp. 44–45 ^ Mommsen. T., Romische Staadtrecht (1887), I, pp. 375–6 ^ Michels, A. K., The Calendar of the Roman Republic (1967), pp. 88, 191ff. ^ a b Lintott, A.,The Constitution of the Roman Republic, p. 44 ^ Gellius, Attic Nights, 13.16 ^ Taylor, L. R., Roman Voting Assemblies, p. 63 ^ Taylor, L.R., Roman Voting Assemblies, pp. 6, 63 ^ a b c d Smith, W., Wayte, W., Marindin, G. E., (Eds), A Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities (1890): Comitia ^ a b c d Harper's Dictionary of Classical Antiquities, Second Edition, Harry Thurston Peck, Editor (1897): Comitia ^ Lintott, A., The Constitution of the Roman Republic, p. 45 ^ Taylor, L. R., Roman Voting Assemblies. pp. 2, 16 ^ Taylor, L. R., Roman Voting Assemblies, p. 2 ^ Lintott, A., The Constitution of the Roman Republic, pp. 46–47 ^ a b Taylor, L. R., Roman Voting Assemblies, p. 66 ^ Lintott, A.,The Constitution of the Roman Republic, p. 46 ^ Taylor, L. R., Roman Voting Assemblies, p. 77 ^ Taylor, L. R.,Roman Voting Assemblies, p. 76 ^ Lintott, A.,The Constitution of the Roman Republic, p. 48 ^ Lintott, A., The Constitution of the Roman Republic, pp. 46–7 ^ Crawford, M. H., "Tribus, Tesserae, et Regions," in Comptes rendus de l'Academie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres (2002) vol. 146, pp. 1125–1135 ^ Lintott, A., The Constitution of the Roman Republic, pp. 46, 55 ^ a b c d Botsford, George Willis (1909). The Roman Assemblies. New York: Cooper Square Publishers Inc. p. 459. ^ Taylor, Thomas Marris (1899). A Constitutional and Political History of Rome. London: Methuen & Co. pp. 428. ^ a b c Taylor, Thomas Marris (1899). A Constitutional and Political History of Rome. London: Methuen & Co. pp. 427. ^ Lintott, A., The Constitution of the Roman Republic, p. 51 ^ Oxford Classical Dictionary, 2nd Ed. (1970): "Tribuni Aerarii." ^ Smith, W., Wayte, W., Marindin, G. E., (Eds), A Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities (1890): Tribus Further reading[edit] Cameron, Avril, The Later Roman Empire, (Fontana Press, 1993). Crawford, Michael The Roman Republic (Fontana History of the Ancient World), Fontana Press; New edition, 2011; ISBN 978-0006862505 Crawford, Michael, "Tribus, Tesserae, et Regions," in Comptes rendus de l'Academie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres (2002) vol. 146, pp. 1125–1135 Gruen, Erich, "The Last Generation of the Roman Republic", University of California Press, new edition, 1995; ISBN 978-0520201538 Ihne, Wilhelm. Researches Into the History of the Roman Constitution: With an Appendix upon the Roman Knights (1853), reproduction by Leopold Classic Library, 2016; ASIN: B01AUO6MHU Millar, Fergus, The Emperor in the Roman World, Bristol Classical Press; new edition, 1992; ISBN 978-0715617229 Mommsen, Theodor. Roman Constitutional Law. 1871–1888 The Roman Constitution to the Time of Cicero Tighe, Ambrose. The Development of the Roman Constitution (1859), reproduction by Wentworth Press, 2016; ISBN 978-1371117351 Whetstone Johnston, Harold Orations and Letters of Cicero: With Historical Introduction, An Outline of the Roman Constitution, Notes, Vocabulary and Index (1891), reproduction by Ulan Press, 2012; ASIN: B009FU4FVQ External links[edit] Library resources about Tribal Assembly Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries v t e Roman Constitution Ancient Rome History Constitution Senate Assemblies Curiate Century Tribal Plebeian Magistrates Roman Kingdom History Constitution Senate Assemblies Magistrates Roman Republic History Constitution (reforms of Sulla • reforms of Caesar • reforms of Augustus) Senate Assemblies Magistrates Roman Empire History (post Diocletian) Constitution (post Diocletian) Senate Assemblies Magistrates Miscellaneous Sulla's Constitutional Reforms Caesar's Constitutional Reforms Conflict of the Orders Roman law v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tribal_Assembly&oldid=993641765" Categories: Government of the Roman Republic Popular assemblies Hidden categories: All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from February 2017 Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Català Deutsch Español Esperanto Français 한국어 Hrvatski Italiano ქართული Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Polski Português Русский Slovenčina Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Türkçe Українська 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 11 December 2020, at 18:12 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1128 ---- Aelius Donatus - Wikipedia Aelius Donatus From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search from Nuremberg Chronicle Aelius Donatus (English: /doʊˈneɪtəs/; fl. mid-fourth century AD) was a Roman grammarian and teacher of rhetoric. St. Jerome states in Contra Rufinum 1.16 that Donatus was his tutor. Contents 1 Works 2 References 3 Further reading 4 External links Works[edit] He was the author of a number of professional works, of which several are extant: A partly incomplete commentary on the playwright Terence is compiled from other commentaries, but probably not in its original form. His Life of Virgil is thought to be based on a lost Vita by Suetonius, together with the preface and introduction of his commentary on Virgil's works. A greatly expanded version of Servius' commentary exists, however, which is supplemented with frequent and extensive extracts from what is thought to be Donatus' commentary on Virgil. His Ars grammatica, especially the section on the eight parts of speech, though possessing little claim to originality, and evidently based on the same authorities which were used by the grammarians Charisius and Diomedes, attained such popularity as a schoolbook that, in the Middle Ages, he became the eponym for a rudimentary treatise of any sort, called a donet. When books came to be printed in the 15th century, editions of the little book were multiplied to an enormous extent. It is also the only purely textual work to be printed in blockbook form (cut like a woodcut, not using movable type). It is in the form of an Ars Minor, which only treats of the parts of speech, and an Ars Major, which deals with grammar in general at greater length.[1] Donatus was a proponent of an early system of punctuation, consisting of dots placed in three successively higher positions to indicate successively longer pauses, roughly equivalent to the modern comma, colon, and full stop. This system remained current through the seventh century, when a more refined system due to Isidore of Seville gained prominence.[2] Donatus invented the system whereby a play is made up of three separate parts: protasis, epitasis, and catastrophe. Aelius Donatus should not be confused with Tiberius Claudius Donatus, also the author of a commentary (Interpretationes) on the Aeneid, who lived about 50 years later.[1] References[edit] ^ a b Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Donatus, Aelius" . Encyclopædia Britannica. 8 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 411. ^ M. B. Parkes, Pause and effect: punctuation in the west, 1993, ISBN 0-520-07941-8. Further reading[edit] Daintree, David. 1990. "The Virgil Commentary of Aelius Donatus: Black Hole or 'Éminence Grise'?" Greece & Rome 37.1: 65–79. Demetriou, Chrysanthi. 2014. "Aelius Donatus and His Commentary on Terence’s Comedies." In The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Comedy. Edited by Michael Fontaine and Adele C. Scafuro, 782–799. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. Dutsch, Dorota M. 2008. Feminine Discourse in Roman Comedy. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. Farrell, Joseph. 2016. "Ancient Commentaries on Theocritus’ Idylls and Virgil's Eclogues." In Classical Commentaries: Explorations in a Scholarly Genre. Edited by Christina F. Kraus and Christopher Stray, 397–418. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. Ferri, Rolando. 2016. "An Ancient Grammarian's View of How the Spoken Language Works: Pragmalinguistic Observations in Donatus' Commentum Terentii." In The Latin of the Grammarians: Reflections about Language in the Roman World. Edited by Rolando Ferri and Anna Zago. Turnhout: Brepols Publishers. Kragelund, Patrick. 2012. "Evidence for Performances of Republican Comedy in Fourth-century Rome." Classical Quarterly 62.1: 415–422. Maltby, Robert. 2003. "The Role of Etymologies in Servius and Donatus." In Etymologia: Studies in Ancient Etymology. Proceedings of the Cambridge Conference on Ancient Etymology, 25-27 September 2000. Edited by Christos Nifadopoulos, 103–118. Münster, Germany: Nodus Publikationen. McGill, Scott. 2014. "The Plagiarized Virgil in Donatus, Servius, and the Anthologia Latina." Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 107: 365–383. Murgia, Charles E. 2004. "The Truth about Vergil's Commentators." In Romane Memento: Vergil in the Fourth Century. Edited by Roger Rees, 189–200. London: Duckworth. Stok, F. 2012. "Commenting on Virgil, from Aelius Donatus to Servius." Dead Sea Discoveries 19.3: 464–484. External links[edit] Library resources about Aelius Donatus Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries By Aelius Donatus Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries Vita Vergiliana, Aelius Donatus' Life of Virgil in the original Latin. Suetonius: The Life of Virgil, the Loeb English translation (which presumes that Donatus' Life "is almost wholly Suetonius’.") Virgil.org: Aelius Donatus' Life of Virgil translated into English by David Wilson-Okamura includes interpolated text not included in the Loeb translation Latin texts of some of Aelius Donatus, including the Ars Minor and all the parts of the Ars Major The commentary on Terence online Corpus Grammaticorum Latinorum: complete texts and full bibliography Commentum in Terentii Comoedias From the Rare Book and Special Collections Division at the Library of Congress Authority control BIBSYS: 90202215 BNE: XX1252912 BNF: cb12449870h (data) CANTIC: a10243458 CiNii: DA01014623 GND: 118526715 ISNI: 0000 0001 2128 2471 LCCN: n82032152 NKC: ola2002102099 NLA: 35719108 NSK: 000085103 NTA: 069967652 RERO: 02-A000052502 SELIBR: 183946 SUDOC: 033653836 Trove: 1056742 VcBA: 495/9370 VIAF: 37012417 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n82032152 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aelius_Donatus&oldid=961642114" Categories: Grammarians of Latin Ancient linguists 4th-century Romans 4th-century Latin writers Aelii Hidden categories: Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica with Wikisource reference Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CANTIC identifiers Wikipedia articles with CINII identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers Wikipedia articles with NSK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with RERO identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with Trove identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Languages Asturianu Български Català Čeština Deutsch Español Esperanto Français Galego Íslenska Italiano Latina Lietuvių Magyar Македонски Nederlands 日本語 Norsk nynorsk Polski Português Русский Slovenčina Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Türkçe Українська 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 9 June 2020, at 16:43 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1130 ---- Strategy of the Roman military - Wikipedia Strategy of the Roman military From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Part of a series on the Military of ancient Rome 753 BC – AD 476 Structural history Army Unit types and ranks Decorations and punishments Legions Auxilia Generals Navy Fleets Admirals Campaign history Wars and battles Technological history Military engineering Castra Siege engines Triumphal arches Roads Political history   Strategy and tactics Infantry tactics Frontiers and fortifications Limes Limes Britannicus Antonine Wall Hadrian's Wall Saxon Shore Limes Germanicus Alb Limes Lauter Valley Limes Lower Germanic Limes Main Limes Neckar-Odenwald Limes Upper Germanic-Rhaetian Limes Wetterau Limes Danube–Iller–Rhine Limes Norican Limes Claustra Alpium Iuliarum Pannonian Limes Limes Alutanus Limes Moesiae Trajan's Wall Anastasian Wall Limes Sarmatiae Limes Arabicus Limes Tripolitanus Limes Mauretaniae  Ancient Rome portal •  War portal v t e The strategy of the Roman military contains its grand strategy (the arrangements made by the state to implement its political goals through a selection of military goals, a process of diplomacy backed by threat of military action, and a dedication to the military of part of its production and resources), operational strategy (the coordination and combination of the military forces and their tactics for the goals of an overarching strategy) and, on a small scale, its military tactics (methods for military engagement in order to defeat the enemy). If a fourth rung of "engagement" is added, then the whole can be seen as a ladder, with each level from the foot upwards representing a decreasing concentration on military engagement. Whereas the purest form of tactics or engagement are those free of political imperative, the purest form of political policy does not involve military engagement. Strategy as a whole is the connection between political policy and the use of force to achieve it. Contents 1 Grand strategy 2 Operational strategy 3 Infantry tactics 3.1 Tactical pre-battle maneuvers 3.2 Tactical deployment 3.3 Tactical engagement 4 References Grand strategy[edit] In its clearest form, strategy deals solely with military issues: either a threat or an opportunity is recognised, an evaluation is made, and a military stratagem for meeting it is devised. However, as Clausewitz stated, a successful military strategy may be a means to an end, but it is not an end in itself. Where a state has a long term political goal to which it applies military methods and the resources of the state, that state can be said to have a grand strategy. To an extent, all states will have a grand strategy to a certain degree even if it is simply determining which forces to raise as a military, or how to arm them. Whilst early Rome did raise and arm troops, they tended to raise them annually in response to the specific demands of the state during that year. Such a reactive policy, whilst possibly more efficient than the maintenance of a standing army, does not indicate the close ties between long-term political goals and military organization demanded by grand strategy. Early indications for a Roman grand strategy emerged during the Punic wars with Carthage, in which Rome was able to influence the course of the war by selecting to ignore the armies of Hannibal threatening its homeland and to invade Africa instead in order to dictate the primary theatre of war. In the Empire, as the need for and size of the professional army grew, the possibility arose for the expansion of the concept of a grand strategy to encompass the management of the resources of the entire Roman state in the conduct of warfare: great consideration was given in the Empire to diplomacy and the use of the military to achieve political goals, both through warfare and also as a deterrent. The contribution of actual (rather than potential) military force to strategy was largely reduced to operational strategy - the planning and control of large military units. Rome's grand strategy incorporated diplomacy through which Rome might forge alliances or pressure another nation into compliance, as well as the management of the post-war peace. Operational strategy[edit] Further information: Campaign history of the Roman military Vegetius wrote that "every plan... is to be considered, every expedient tried and every method taken before matters are brought to this last extremity [general engagements]... Good officers decline general engagements where the odds are too great, and prefer the employment of stratagem and finesse to destroy the enemy as much as possible... without exposing their own forces.".[1] However, Vegetius was writing late in the fourth century AD, in the latter years of the Empire. During this period, and for much of the Empire, it can be argued that the Romans did follow a grand strategy calling for limited direct operational engagement. However, earlier in its history, in the Republic and early Empire Rome showed little reluctance to become engaged in direct military engagement, prosecuting offensive operations against numerous adversaries. When a campaign did go badly wrong, operational strategy varied greatly as the circumstances dictated, from naval actions to sieges, assaults of fortified positions and open battle. However, the preponderance of Roman campaigns exhibit a preference for direct engagement in open battle and, where necessary, the overcoming of fortified positions via military engineering. The Roman army was adept at building fortified camps for protection from enemy attack, but history shows a reluctance to sit in the camp awaiting battle and a history of seeking open battle. Infantry tactics[edit] Main article: Roman infantry tactics Roman armies of the Republic and early empire worked from a set tactical 'handbook', a military tradition of deploying forces that provided for few variations and was ignored or elaborated only on occasion. Tactical pre-battle maneuvers[edit] Once the legion had deployed on an operation, they would generally march to their objective. There were exceptions when the armies were transported by the Roman navy but even then in most instances this was followed by a march of several days or weeks. The approach to the battlefield was made in several columns, enhancing maneuver. Typically a strong vanguard preceded the main body, and included scouts, cavalry and light troops. A tribune or other officer often accompanied the vanguard to survey the terrain for possible camp locations. Flank and recon elements were also deployed to provide the usual covering security. Behind the vanguard came the main body of heavy infantry. Each legion marched as a distinct formation and was accompanied by its own baggage train. At the end of a day's march, the Romans would typically establish a strong field camp called a castra, complete with palisade and a deep ditch, providing a basis for supply storage, troop marshalling and defence. Streets were laid out, units designated to take specific places, and guards posted at carefully designed gates. Construction could take between 2 and 5 hours with part of the army laboring, while the rest stood guard, depending on the tactical situation. No other ancient army persisted over such a long period in systematic camp construction like the Romans, even if the army rested for only a single day. This concentration of conservative security in deployment was mirrored both in the measured tactics of engagement for the infantry and by the largely conservative operational strategies employed. Tactical deployment[edit] The Roman heavy infantry typically was deployed, as the main body, facing the enemy, in three approximately equal lines, with the cavalry or equites on their wings to prevent them being flanked and turned, and light infantry in a screen in front of them to hide maneuvers of the heavy infantry, harass the enemy forces and, in some cases, drive off units such as elephants that would be a great threat to close-order heavy infantry. They were deployed in a quincunx checkered pattern. Alternative tactical formations were adopted occasionally. Tactical engagement[edit] In the same way that Roman tactical maneuver was measured and cautious, so too was their actual engagement of the enemy. The soldiers were long-term service professionals whose interest lay in receiving a large pension and an allocation of land on retirement from the army, rather than in seeking glory on the battlefield as a warrior. The tactics of engagement largely reflected this, concentrating on maintaining formation order and protecting individual troops rather than pushing aggressively to destroy the maximum number of enemy troops in a wild charge. A battle usually opened with light troops skirmishing with the opposition. These light forces then withdrew to the flanks or between the gaps in the central line of heavy infantry. Cavalry might be launched against their opposing numbers or used to screen the central core from envelopment. As the gap between the contenders closed, the heavy infantry typically took the initiative, attacking on the double. The front ranks usually cast their pila, and the following ranks hurled theirs over the heads of the front-line fighters. If a cast pilum did not cause direct death or injury, they were so designed that the hard iron triangular points would stick into enemy shields, bending on their soft metal shafts, weighing down the shields and making them unusable. After the pila were cast, the soldiers then drew their swords and engaged the enemy. However, rather than charging as might be assumed, great emphasis was placed on the protection gained from sheltering behind the scutum and remaining unexposed, stabbing out from behind the protection of the shield whenever an exposed enemy presented himself. Fresh troops were fed in from the rear, through the "checkboard" arrangement, to relieve the injured and exhausted further ahead. Many Roman battles, especially during the late empire, were fought with the preparatory bombardment from ballistas and onagers. These war machines, a form of ancient artillery, launched arrows and large stones towards the enemy, proving most effective against close-order formations and structures. References[edit] ^ Vegetius, The Military Institutions of the Romans, Greenwood, 1985, p. 87 v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Strategy_of_the_Roman_military&oldid=953961634" Categories: Military of ancient Rome Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Italiano עברית Edit links This page was last edited on 29 April 2020, at 23:32 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1143 ---- Spartacus - Wikipedia Spartacus From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search For other uses, see Spartacus (disambiguation). Not to be confused with Spartocus or Sportacus. Spartacus The Death of Spartacus by Hermann Vogel (1882) Born c. 111 BC Near the Strymon river in present-day Bulgaria Died 71 BC (aged 39–40) Near Sele River in Lucania, Italy[1] Years of service 73–71 BC Commands held Rebel slave army Battles/wars Third Servile War Spartacus (Greek: Σπάρτακος Spártakos; Latin: Spartacus; c. 111–71 BC) was a Thracian gladiator who, along with Crixus, Gannicus, Castus, and Oenomaus, was one of the escaped slave leaders in the Third Servile War, a major slave uprising against the Roman Republic. Little is known about him beyond the events of the war, and surviving historical accounts are sometimes contradictory. However, all sources agree that he was a former gladiator and an accomplished military leader. This rebellion, interpreted by some as an example of oppressed people fighting for their freedom against a slave-owning oligarchy, has provided inspiration for many political thinkers, and has been featured in literature, television, and film.[2] Although this interpretation is not specifically contradicted by classical historians, no historical account mentions that the goal was to end slavery in the Republic.[3] Contents 1 Early life 2 Enslavement and escape 3 Third Servile War 4 Objectives 5 Legacy and recognition 5.1 In communism 5.2 In sports 5.3 In Russia 5.4 In Ukraine 5.5 In Bulgaria 5.6 In Serbia 5.7 In Slovakia 5.8 In other countries 6 In popular culture 6.1 Film 6.2 Television 6.3 Literature 6.4 Music 6.5 Video games 6.6 Places 7 See also 8 References 9 Bibliography 9.1 Classical authors 9.2 Modern historiography 10 External links Early life Balkan tribes, including the Maedi ("Maidoi", on map). The Greek essayist Plutarch describes Spartacus as "a Thracian of Nomadic stock",[4] in a possible reference to the Maedi tribe.[5] Appian says he was "a Thracian by birth, who had once served as a soldier with the Romans, but had since been a prisoner and sold for a gladiator".[6] Florus described him as one "who, from a Thracian mercenary, had become a Roman soldier, that had deserted and became enslaved, and afterward, from consideration of his strength, a gladiator".[7] The authors refer to the Thracian tribe of the Maedi,[8][9][10] which occupied the area on the southwestern fringes of Thrace, along its border with the Roman province of Macedonia – present day south-western Bulgaria.[11] Plutarch also writes that Spartacus' wife, a prophetess of the Maedi tribe, was enslaved with him. The name Spartacus is otherwise manifested in the Black Sea region. Five out of twenty Kings of the Thracian Spartocid dynasty of the Cimmerian Bosporus[12] and Pontus[13] are known to have borne it, and a Thracian "Sparta" "Spardacus"[14] or "Sparadokos",[15] father of Seuthes I of the Odrysae, is also known. Enslavement and escape The extent of the Roman Republic at 100 BC. According to the differing sources and their interpretation, Spartacus was a captive taken by the legions.[16] Spartacus was trained at the gladiatorial school (ludus) near Capua belonging to Lentulus Batiatus. He was a heavyweight gladiator called a murmillo. These fighters carried a large oblong shield (scutum), and used a sword with a broad, straight blade (gladius), about 18 inches long.[17] In 73 BC, Spartacus was among a group of gladiators plotting an escape.[18] About 70[19] slaves were part of the plot. Though few in number, they seized kitchen utensils, fought their way free from the school, and seized several wagons of gladiatorial weapons and armour.[18] The escaped slaves defeated soldiers sent after them, plundered the region surrounding Capua, recruited many other slaves into their ranks, and eventually retired to a more defensible position on Mount Vesuvius.[20][21] Once free, the escaped gladiators chose Spartacus and two Gallic slaves—Crixus and Oenomaus—as their leaders. Although Roman authors assumed that the escaped slaves were a homogeneous group with Spartacus as their leader, they may have projected their own hierarchical view of military leadership onto the spontaneous organization, reducing other slave leaders to subordinate positions in their accounts. Third Servile War Further information: Third Servile War The response of the Romans was hampered by the absence of the Roman legions, which were already engaged in fighting a revolt in Spain and the Third Mithridatic War. Furthermore, the Romans considered the rebellion more of a policing matter than a war. Rome dispatched militia under the command of praetor Gaius Claudius Glaber, who besieged Spartacus and his camp on Mount Vesuvius, hoping that starvation would force Spartacus to surrender. They were surprised when Spartacus, who had made ropes from vines, climbed down the cliff side of the volcano with his men and attacked the unfortified Roman camp in the rear, killing most of them.[22] The rebels also defeated a second expedition, nearly capturing the praetor commander, killing his lieutenants and seizing the military equipment.[23] With these successes, more and more slaves flocked to the Spartacan forces, as did "many of the herdsmen and shepherds of the region", swelling their ranks to some 70,000.[24] At its height Spartacus led an army derived of many different people, Celts, Gauls, and more. Also due to Social War, some of Spartacus' ranks were legion veterans.[25] Of the slaves that joined Spartacus ranks, they were from the countryside. The rural slave lived a life in the frontier thus better equipping themselves to march with Spartacus' army. In contrast, urban slaves were more suited for city life, being considered "privileged" and "lazy."[26] Of the people who fought in Spartacus' army, it shows that the revolt did not have the goal of freeing all slaves. In these altercations Spartacus proved to be an excellent tactician, suggesting that he may have had previous military experience. Though the rebels lacked military training, they displayed a skilful use of available local materials and unusual tactics when facing the disciplined Roman armies.[27] They spent the winter of 73–72 BC training, arming and equipping their new recruits, and expanding their raiding territory to include the towns of Nola, Nuceria, Thurii and Metapontum.[28] The distance between these locations and the subsequent events indicate that the slaves operated in two groups commanded by the remaining leaders Spartacus and Crixus.[citation needed] In the spring of 72 BC, the rebels left their winter encampments and began to move northward. At the same time, the Roman Senate, alarmed by the defeat of the praetorian forces, dispatched a pair of consular legions under the command of Lucius Gellius and Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Clodianus.[29] The two legions were initially successful—defeating a group of 30,000 rebels commanded by Crixus near Mount Garganus[30]—but then were defeated by Spartacus. These defeats are depicted in divergent ways by the two most comprehensive (extant) histories of the war by Appian and Plutarch.[31][32][33][34] Alarmed at the continued threat posed by the slaves, the Senate charged Marcus Licinius Crassus, the wealthiest man in Rome and the only volunteer for the position,[35] with ending the rebellion. Crassus was put in charge of eight legions, approximately 40,000 trained Roman soldiers,[36][failed verification][37] which he treated with harsh, even brutal discipline, reviving the punishment "decimation" on units.[35] When Spartacus and his followers, who for unclear reasons had retreated to the south of Italy, moved northward again in early 71 BC, Crassus deployed six of his legions on the borders of the region and detached his legate Mummius with two legions to maneuver behind Spartacus. Though ordered not to engage the rebels, Mummius attacked at a seemingly opportune moment but was routed.[38] After this, Crassus's legions were victorious in several engagements, forcing Spartacus farther south through Lucania as Crassus gained the upper hand. By the end of 71 BC, Spartacus was encamped in Rhegium (Reggio Calabria), near the Strait of Messina. A 19th-century depiction of the fall of Spartacus by the Italian Nicola Sanesi (1818–1889) According to Plutarch, Spartacus made a bargain with Cilician pirates to transport him and some 2,000 of his men to Sicily, where he intended to incite a slave revolt and gather reinforcements. However, he was betrayed by the pirates, who took payment and then abandoned the rebels.[38] Minor sources mention that there were some attempts at raft and shipbuilding by the rebels as a means to escape, but that Crassus took unspecified measures to ensure the rebels could not cross to Sicily, and their efforts were abandoned.[39] Spartacus's forces then retreated toward Rhegium. Crassus's legions followed and upon arrival built fortifications across the isthmus at Rhegium,[citation needed] despite harassing raids from the rebels. The rebels were now under siege and cut off from their supplies.[40] At this time, the legions of Pompey returned from Hispania and were ordered by the Senate to head south to aid Crassus.[41] While Crassus feared that Pompey's arrival would cost him the credit, Spartacus unsuccessfully tried to reach an agreement with Crassus.[42] When Crassus refused, Spartacus and his army broke through the Roman fortifications and headed up the Bruttium peninsula with Crassus's legions in pursuit.[43] When the legions managed to catch a portion of the rebels separated from the main army,[44] discipline among Spartacus's forces broke down as small groups independently attacked the oncoming legions.[45] Spartacus now turned his forces around and brought his entire strength to bear on the legions in a last stand, in which the rebels were routed completely, with the vast majority of them being killed on the battlefield.[46] The final battle that saw the assumed defeat of Spartacus in 71 BC took place on the present territory of Senerchia on the right bank of the river Sele in the area that includes the border with Oliveto Citra up to those of Calabritto, near the village of Quaglietta, in the High Sele Valley, which at that time was part of Lucania. In this area, since 1899, there have been finds of armour and swords of the Roman era. Plutarch, Appian and Florus all claim that Spartacus died during the battle, but Appian also reports that his body was never found.[47] Six thousand survivors of the revolt captured by the legions of Crassus were crucified, lining the Appian Way from Rome to Capua.[48] Objectives Classical historians were divided as to the motives of Spartacus. None of Spartacus's actions overtly suggest that he aimed at reforming Roman society or abolishing slavery. Plutarch writes that Spartacus wished to escape north into Cisalpine Gaul and disperse his men back to their homes.[49] If escaping the Italian peninsula was indeed his goal, it is not clear why Spartacus turned south after defeating the legions commanded by the consuls Lucius Publicola and Gnaeus Clodianus, which left his force a clear passage over the Alps. Appian and Florus write that he intended to march on Rome itself.[50] Appian also states that he later abandoned that goal, which might have been no more than a reflection of Roman fears. Based on the events in late 73 BC and early 72 BC, which suggest independently operating groups of escaped slaves[51] and a statement by Plutarch, it appears that some of the escaped slaves preferred to plunder Italy, rather than escape over the Alps.[49][clarification needed] Legacy and recognition Toussaint Louverture, a leader of the slave revolt that led to the independence of Haiti, has been called the "Black Spartacus".[52][53] Adam Weishaupt, founder of the Bavarian Illuminati, often referred to himself as Spartacus within written correspondences.[54] In communism Viva Spartaco, Spartaco a Rosarno: graffiti connecting Spartacus with 2010 Rosarno riots between locals and migrant farm workers In modern times, Spartacus became an icon for communists and socialists. Karl Marx listed Spartacus as one of his heroes and described him as "the most splendid fellow in the whole of ancient history" and a "great general, noble character, real representative of the ancient proletariat".[55] Spartacus has been a great inspiration to left-wing revolutionaries, most notably the German Spartacus League (1915–18), a forerunner of the Communist Party of Germany.[56] A January 1919 uprising by communists in Germany was called the Spartacist uprising.[53] Spartacus Books, one of the longest running collectively-run leftist book stores in North America, is also named in his honour. In sports Several sports clubs around the world, in particular the former Soviet and the Communist bloc, were named after the Roman gladiator. Spartacus's name was chosen in numerous football sides in Slavic Europe. In Russia FC Spartak Moscow, a football club FC Spartak Kostroma, a football club PFC Spartak Nalchik, a football club FC Spartak Vladikavkaz, a football club HC Spartak Moscow, an ice hockey team Spartak Saint Petersburg, a basketball team Spartak Tennis Club, a tennis training facility WBC Spartak Moscow, a women's basketball team In Ukraine FC Spartak Sumy, a football club Spartak, a village in Donetsk Oblast Spartak Ivano-Frankivsk, a football team Zakarpattia Uzhhorod, a football club, formerly known as Spartak Uzhhorod Spartak Lviv Spartak Kyiv Spartak Odesa, a football team competed in the 1941 Soviet war league Spartak Kharkiv, a football team competed in the 1941 Soviet war league In Bulgaria PFC Spartak Varna, a football team PFC Spartak Pleven, a football team FC Spartak Plovdiv, a football team Spartak Sofia, a former football team In Serbia FK Spartak Subotica, a football team FK Radnički, several teams In Slovakia FC Spartak Trnava, a football team TJ Spartak Myjava, a football team FK Spartak Vráble, a football team FK Spartak Bánovce nad Bebravou, a football team In other countries Spartak Stadium (disambiguation) Barnt Green Spartak F.C., an English football team Spartak (Cape Verde), a Cape Verdean football team FC Spartak Semey, a Kazakh football team Spartacus's name was also used in athletics in the Soviet Union and communist states of Central and Eastern Europe. The Spartakiad was a Soviet bloc version of the Olympic games.[57] This name was also used for the mass gymnastics exhibition held every five years in Czechoslovakia. The mascot for the Ottawa Senators, Spartacat, is also named after him. In popular culture Spartacus, marble sculpture by Denis Foyatier (1830), Louvre Museum Film The film Spartacus (1960), which was executive-produced by and starred Kirk Douglas, was based on Howard Fast's novel Spartacus and directed by Stanley Kubrick. The phrase "I'm Spartacus!" from this film has been referenced in a number of other films, television programs, and commercials. Television Fast's novel was adapted as a 2004 miniseries by the USA Network, with Goran Višnjić in the main role. One episode of 2007–2008 BBC's docudrama Heroes and Villains features Spartacus. The television series Spartacus, starring Andy Whitfield and later Liam McIntyre in the title role, aired on the Starz premium cable network from January 2010 to April 2013.[58][59] The History Channel's Barbarians Rising (2016) features the story of Spartacus in its third episode entitled "Rebellion". The fifth series of Outnumbered had Ben Brockmans (Daniel Roche)play Spartacus in a musical called Spartacus.[60] Literature Howard Fast wrote the historical novel Spartacus, the basis of the 1960 film of the same name. Arthur Koestler wrote a novel about Spartacus called The Gladiators. The Scottish writer Lewis Grassic Gibbon wrote a novel Spartacus. The Italian writer Raffaello Giovagnoli wrote his historical novel, Spartacus, in 1874. His novel has been subsequently translated and published in many European countries. The German writer Bertolt Brecht wrote Spartacus, his second play, before 1920. It was later renamed Drums in the Night. The Latvian writer Andrejs Upīts in 1943 wrote the play Spartacus. The Polish writer Halina Rudnicka [pl] in 1951 wrote a novel Uczniowie Spartakusa (Spartacus' disciples). The Reverend Elijah Kellogg's Spartacus to the Gladiators at Capua has been used effectively by school pupils to practice their oratory skills for ages. Amal Donkol, the Egyptian modern poet wrote "The Last Words of Spartacus". Max Gallo wrote the novel Les Romains.Spartacus. La Revolte des Esclaves, Librairie Artheme Fayard, 2006. In the Fate/Apocrypha light novel series by Yūichirō Higashide, Spartacus appears as a Berserker-class Servant summoned by the Red faction. In the anime adaptation of the novels, Spartacus is voiced by Satoshi Tsuruoka in Japanese and Josh Tomar in English. This version of Spartacus would also appear in the mobile RPG Fate/Grand Order. Music The "Spartacus Overture" was written by composer Camille Saint-Saëns in 1863. "Love Theme From Spartacus" was a hit for composer Alex North and has become a jazz standard. Spartacus (1954, first staged in 1956) is a ballet, with a score by Soviet Armenian composer Aram Khachaturian. In 1975, Triumvirat reached the apex of their commercial success with the release of Spartacus, a classic "prog rock" album. Australian composer Carl Vine wrote a short piano piece entitled "Spartacus", from Red Blues. Phantom Regiment's show, "Spartacus", was the championship show of the 2008 Drum Corps International season. Jeff Wayne released his musical retelling, Jeff Wayne's Musical Version of Spartacus, in 1992. Video games In Age of Empires: Rise of Rome Expansion IV Enemies of Rome, 3: Spartacus the campaign has the player fighting against Spartacus' army. In Spartacus Legends, Spartacus appears as an endgame boss. Places Spartacus Peak on Livingston Island in the South Shetland Islands. See also Ancient Rome portal Alaric I Ambiorix Ardaric Arminius Autaritus Bato Battle of Baduhenna Wood Boudica Fritigern Gaius Julius Civilis John of Gothia List of people who disappeared Totila Vercingetorix Viriathus References ^ Plutarch, Crassus, 11:4–7 Archived 10 April 2020 at the Wayback Machine ^ Historian Barry Strauss on His New Book The Spartacus War (Interview). Simon & Schuster. 2009. ^ Strauss 2009, p. 7 harvnb error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFStrauss2009 (help) "We do not know if Spartacus wanted to abolish slavery, but if so, he aimed low. He and his men freed only gladiators, farmers, and shepherds. They avoided urban slaves, a softer and more elite group than rural workers. They rallied slaves to the cry not only of freedom but also to the themes of nationalism, religion, revenge, and riches. Another paradox: they might have been liberators but the rebels brought ruin. They devastated southern Italy in search of food and trouble." ^ "Plutarch, Crassus 8". Archived from the original on 10 April 2020. Retrieved 26 November 2006. ^ Nic Fields (2009). Spartacus and the Slave War 73–71 BC: A Gladiator Rebels Against Rome. Osprey Publishing. p. 28. ISBN 978-1-84603-353-7. ^ Appian, Civil Wars 1.116 Archived 3 June 2020 at the Wayback Machine ^ Florus, Epitome of Roman History 2.8.8 ^ Sallust (1994). The histories. Vol.2, Books iii–v. Translated by McGushin, Patrick. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0198721437. ^ Annuaire de l'Université de Sofia, Faculté d'histoire, Volume 77, Issue 2, 1985, p. 122. 1985. Retrieved 24 February 2013. ^ Strauss 2009, p. 31 harvnb error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFStrauss2009 (help) ^ John Boardman; I. E. S. Edwards, N. G. L. Hammond and E. Sollberger, eds. (1982). The Cambridge Ancient History (PDF) (2 ed.). Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521224963. ISBN 978-0521224963. ^ Diodorus Siculus, Historical Library Book 12 ^ Diodorus Siculus, Historical Library Book 16 Archived 17 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine ^ Theucidides, History of the Peloponnesian War 2.101 ^ "Tribes, Dynasts and Kingdoms of Northern Greece: History and Numismatics". Archived from the original on 27 August 2007. Retrieved 28 February 2007. ^ Appian, Civil Wars, 1:116 Archived 3 June 2020 at the Wayback Machine; Plutarch, Crassus, 8:2 Archived 10 April 2020 at the Wayback Machine. Note: Spartacus' status as an auxilia is taken from the Loeb edition of Appian translated by Horace White, which states "...who had once served as a soldier with the Romans...". However, the translation by John Carter in the Penguin Classics version reads: "...who had once fought against the Romans and after being taken prisoner and sold...". ^ Strauss 2009, p. 11 harvnb error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFStrauss2009 (help) ^ a b Plutarch, Crassus, 8:1–2 Archived 10 April 2020 at the Wayback Machine; Appian, Civil Wars, 1:116 Archived 3 June 2020 at the Wayback Machine; Livy, Periochae, 95:2; Florus, Epitome, 2.8. Plutarch claims 78 escaped, Livy claims 74, Appian "about seventy", and Florus says "thirty or rather more men". "Choppers and spits" is from Life of Crassus. ^ However, according to Cicero (Ad Atticum VI, ii, 8) at the beginning his followers were much less than 50. ^ Plutarch, Crassus, 9:1 Archived 10 April 2020 at the Wayback Machine. ^ Appian, Civil Wars, 1:116 Archived 3 June 2020 at the Wayback Machine; Florus, Epitome, 2.8. ^ Plutarch, Crassus, 9:1–3 Archived 17 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine; Frontinus, Stratagems, Book I, 5:20–22; Appian, Civil Wars, 1:116 Archived 3 June 2020 at the Wayback Machine; Broughton, Magistrates of the Roman Republic, p. 109. ^ Plutarch, Crassus, 9:4–5 Archived 10 April 2020 at the Wayback Machine; Livy, Periochae , 95; Appian, Civil Wars, 1:116 Archived 3 June 2020 at the Wayback Machine; Sallust, Histories, 3:64–67. ^ Plutarch, Crassus, 9:3 Archived 10 April 2020 at the Wayback Machine; Appian, Civil War, 1:116 Archived 3 June 2020 at the Wayback Machine. ^ Beard, Mary (2015). SPQR A History of Ancient Rome. New York: Liveright Publishing Corporation. pp. 249–250. ISBN 978-1-63149-222-8. ^ Strauss, Barry (2009). The Spartacus War. New York: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks. p. 46. ISBN 978-1-4165-3206-4. ^ Frontinus, Stratagems, Book I, 5:20–22 and Book VII:6. ^ Florus, Epitome, 2.8. ^ Appian, Civil Wars, 1:116–117 Archived 3 June 2020 at the Wayback Machine; Plutarch, Crassus 9:6 Archived 10 April 2020 at the Wayback Machine; Sallust, Histories, 3:64–67. ^ Appian, Civil Wars, 1:117 Archived 3 June 2020 at the Wayback Machine; Plutarch, Crassus 9:7 Archived 10 April 2020 at the Wayback Machine; Livy, Periochae 96. ^ Appian, Civil Wars, 1:117 Archived 3 June 2020 at the Wayback Machine. ^ Plutarch, Crassus, 9:7 Archived 10 April 2020 at the Wayback Machine. ^ "Spartacus and the Slave Rebellion". Historynet.com. Archived from the original on 7 August 2011. Retrieved 24 February 2013. ^ Shaw, Brent D. (2001). Spartacus and the servile wars: a brief history with documents. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-312-23703-5. ^ a b Appian, Civil Wars, 1:118 Archived 3 June 2020 at the Wayback Machine. ^ Plutarch, Crassus 10:1 Archived 10 April 2020 at the Wayback Machine. ^ Appian, Civil Wars, 1:118 Archived 3 June 2020 at the Wayback Machine; Smith, A Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities, "Exercitus", p.494 Archived 6 October 2012 at the Wayback Machine. ^ a b Plutarch, Crassus, 10:1–3 Archived 10 April 2020 at the Wayback Machine. ^ Florus, Epitome, 2.8; Cicero, Orations, "For Quintius, Sextus Roscius...", 5.2 Archived 27 March 2008 at the Wayback Machine ^ Plutarch, Crassus, 10:4–5 Archived 10 April 2020 at the Wayback Machine. ^ Contrast Plutarch, Crassus, 11:2 Archived 10 April 2020 at the Wayback Machine with Appian, Civil Wars, 1:119 Archived 3 June 2020 at the Wayback Machine. ^ Appian, Civil Wars, 1:120 Archived 3 June 2020 at the Wayback Machine. ^ Appian, Civil Wars, 1:120 Archived 3 June 2020 at the Wayback Machine; Plutarch, Crassus, 10:6 Archived 10 April 2020 at the Wayback Machine. ^ Plutarch, Crassus, 11:3 Archived 10 April 2020 at the Wayback Machine; Livy, Periochae, 97:1. Bradley, Slavery and Rebellion. p. 97; Plutarch, Crassus, 11:4 Archived 10 April 2020 at the Wayback Machine. ^ Plutarch, Crassus, 11:5 Archived 10 April 2020 at the Wayback Machine;. ^ Appian, Civil Wars, 1:120 Archived 3 June 2020 at the Wayback Machine; Plutarch, Crassus, 11:6–7 Archived 10 April 2020 at the Wayback Machine; Livy, Periochae, 97.1. ^ Appian, Civil Wars, 1:120 Archived 3 June 2020 at the Wayback Machine; Florus, Epitome, 2.8. ^ Appian, Civil Wars, 1.120 Archived 3 June 2020 at the Wayback Machine. ^ a b Plutarch Crassus, 9:5–6 Archived 10 April 2020 at the Wayback Machine. ^ Appian, Civil Wars, 1:117 Archived 3 June 2020 at the Wayback Machine; Florus, Epitome, 2.8. ^ Plutarch, Crassus, 9:7 Archived 10 April 2020 at the Wayback Machine; Appian, Civil Wars, 1:117 Archived 3 June 2020 at the Wayback Machine. ^ Thomson, Ian (31 January 2004). "The black Spartacus". The Guardian. Patrick Leigh Fermor hailed L'Ouverture as the "black Spartacus" after the slave who challenged Rome... ^ a b Diken, Bulent (2012). Revolt, Revolution, Critique: The Paradox of Society. Routledge. p. 61. ISBN 978-1134005642. ...like the 'black Spartacus' Toussaint–Louverture, the leader of the insurgent black slaves who escaped from plantations and defeated the Napoleonic forces in Haiti in 1796–1804, or like the 'Spartacist' leaders of the communist revolt in Germany in 1919. ^ Douglas Reed (1978). The controversy of Zion. Dolphin Press. p. 139. ISBN 9780620041331. ^ de Ste. Croix, G. E. M. (1989). The Class Struggle in the Ancient Greek World. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. p. 25]. ISBN 978-0801495977. ^ Fowkes, Ben (2014). The German Left and the Weimar Republic: A Selection of Documents. Brill. p. 71. ISBN 978-9004271081. ^ Great Soviet Encyclopedia, 3rd edition, volume 24 (part 1), p. 286, Moscow, Sovetskaya Entsiklopediya publisher, 1976. ^ "Spartacus". Tvblog.ugo.com  – Comic-Con 2009. 29 June 2009. Archived from the original on 16 July 2012. Retrieved 24 February 2013. ^ "AUSXIP Spartacus: Blood and Sand TV Show Lucy Lawless Sam Raimi & Rob Tapert". Spartacus.ausxip.com. Archived from the original on 7 July 2011. Retrieved 24 February 2013. ^ https://www.radiotimes.com/tv-programme/e/ctbn8d/outnumbered--s5-e6-spartacus-the-musical/ Bibliography Classical authors Appian. Civil Wars. Translated by J. Carter. (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1996) Florus. Epitome of Roman History. (London: W. Heinemann, 1947) Orosius. The Seven Books of History Against the Pagans. Translated by Roy J. Deferrari. (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1964). Plutarch. Fall of the Roman Republic. Translated by R. Warner. (London: Penguin Books, 1972), with special emphasis placed on "The Life of Crassus" and "The Life of Pompey". Sallust. Conspiracy of Catiline and the War of Jugurtha. (London: Constable, 1924) Modern historiography Bradley, Keith R. Slavery and Rebellion in the Roman World, 140 B.C.–70 B.C. Bloomington; Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1989 (hardcover, ISBN 0-253-31259-0); 1998 (paperback, ISBN 0-253-21169-7). [Chapter V] The Slave War of Spartacus, pp. 83–101. Rubinsohn, Wolfgang Zeev. Spartacus' Uprising and Soviet Historical Writing. Oxford: Oxbow Books, 1987 (paperback, ISBN 0-9511243-1-5). Spartacus: Film and History, edited by Martin M. Winkler. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2007 (hardcover, ISBN 1-4051-3180-2; paperback, ISBN 1-4051-3181-0). Trow, M.J. Spartacus: The Myth and the Man. Stroud, United Kingdom: Sutton Publishing, 2006 (hardcover, ISBN 0-7509-3907-9). Genner, Michael. "Spartakus. Eine Gegengeschichte des Altertums nach den Legenden der Zigeuner". Two volumes. Paperback. Trikont Verlag, München 1979/1980. Vol 1 ISBN 978-3-88167-053-1 Vol 2 ISBN 978-3-88167-060-9 Plamen Pavlov, Stanimir Dimitrov,Spartak – sinyt na drenva Trakija/Spartacus – the Son of ancient Thrace. Sofia, 2009, ISBN 978-954-378-024-2 Strauss, Barry (2009). The Spartacus War. Simon & Schuster. ISBN 978-1-4165-3205-7. Beard, Mary. SPQR A History of Ancient Rome. New York: Liveright Publishing Corporation, 2015, ISBN 978-1-63149-222-8 External links Wikimedia Commons has media related to Spartacus. Wikisource has the text of the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica article Spartacus. BBC Radio 4 – In Our Time – Spartacus Spartacus Article and full text of the Roman and Greek sources. Spartacus, movie starring Kirk Douglas and Sir Peter Ustinov Spartacus, television mini-series starring Goran Višnjić and Alan Bates Starz Mini-Series airing in 2010 v t e Spartacus in fiction and media Film Sins of Rome (1953) Spartacus (1960) Spartacus and the Ten Gladiators (1964) Spartacus (2004) Heroes and Villains (2007) Television Spartacus (2010) Literature "Spartacus to the Gladiators at Capua" (1842) Spartacus (1933) The Gladiators (1939) Spartacus (1951) Albums Spartacus (1975) Jeff Wayne's Musical Version of Spartacus (1992) Theatre The Gladiator Spartacus (ballet) Games Spartacus Legends (2013) Authority control BNE: XX917750 BNF: cb12708622j (data) CANTIC: a11012043 GND: 118615947 ISNI: 0000 0001 2142 912X LCCN: n50021231 NKC: jn20000701683 NSK: 000603749 SUDOC: 072326069 VcBA: 495/196493 VIAF: 316749908 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n50021231 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spartacus&oldid=990932762" Categories: Spartacus 110s BC births 71 BC deaths 1st-century BC Romans Ancient Thracians killed in battle Deaths by blade weapons Greek generals Rebel slaves in ancient Rome Roman-era Thracians Roman gladiators Third Servile War Thracian people Republican era slaves and freedmen Hidden categories: Webarchive template wayback links Harv and Sfn multiple-target errors Wikipedia indefinitely semi-protected pages Use dmy dates from November 2020 Articles containing Greek-language text Articles containing Latin-language text All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from November 2011 All articles with failed verification Articles with failed verification from October 2013 Articles with unsourced statements from October 2013 Wikipedia articles needing clarification from October 2013 Commons link is on Wikidata Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CANTIC identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NSK identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Year of birth uncertain Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read View source View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Languages العربية Asturianu Azərbaycanca تۆرکجه Башҡортса Беларуская Български Català Чӑвашла Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français Frysk Gaeilge Galego 𐌲𐌿𐍄𐌹𐍃𐌺 한국어 Հայերեն हिन्दी Hrvatski Bahasa Indonesia Íslenska Italiano עברית ಕನ್ನಡ ქართული Қазақша Kiswahili Kotava Kurdî Latina Latviešu Lietuvių Lumbaart Magyar Malagasy മലയാളം مصرى مازِرونی Bahasa Melayu Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Norsk nynorsk Occitan Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча ਪੰਜਾਬੀ Polski Português Română Русский සිංහල Simple English Slovenčina Ślůnski Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Tagalog தமிழ் తెలుగు ไทย Türkçe Українська Tiếng Việt Winaray 吴语 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 27 November 2020, at 09:54 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1145 ---- National Library of Greece - Wikipedia National Library of Greece From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia   (Redirected from NLG (identifier)) Jump to navigation Jump to search National Library of Greece Εθνική Βιβλιοθήκη της Ελλάδος Ethnikí Vivliothíki tis Elládos The façade of the main building of the library Established 1832 (188 years ago) (1832) Location Athens Coordinates 37°58′52″N 23°43′59″E / 37.98111°N 23.73306°E / 37.98111; 23.73306 Branches 2 (Αγία Παρασκευή/Agía Paraskeví & Νέα Χαλκηδόνα/Néa Chalkidóna) Collection Items collected books, journals, newspapers, magazines, multimedia and manuscripts Criteria for collection Material that is produced in Greece as well as Material that is produced abroad, but is connected with Greece in any language and form. Other information Director Fillipos Tsimpoglou (Φίλιππος Τσιμπόγλου), general director.[1] Website www.nlg.gr Map The National Library of Greece (Greek: Εθνική Βιβλιοθήκη) is situated near the center of city of Athens. It was designed by the Danish architect Theophil Freiherr von Hansen, as part of his famous Trilogy of neo-classical buildings including the Academy of Athens and the original building of the Athens University. It was founded by Ioannis Kapodistrias. Contents 1 History 2 Holdings 3 Relocation to Phaleron Bay 4 See also 5 References 6 External links History[edit] The original idea for establishing a National Library was from the philhellene Johann Jakob Mayer, in an August 1824 article of his newspaper Ellinika Chronika, published at Missolonghi, where Mayer and Lord Byron had been promoting Greece's independence. Mayer's idea was implemented in 1829 by the new Greek government of Ioannis Kapodistrias,[2] who grouped together the National Library with other intellectual institutions such as schools, national museums, and printing houses. These were all placed in a building (then being used as an orphanage) on the island Aegina and supervised by Andreas Moustoxydis, who thus became president of the committee of the Orphanage, director of the National Archaeological Museum of Athens, and director of the National School. At the end of 1830, the library, which Moustoxydis named the National Library, had 1,018 volumes of printed books, which had been collected from Greeks and philhellenes. In 1834, the Library was relocated to Athens, the new capital, and was at first housed temporarily in the public bath in the Roman Agora of Athens and then later in the Panagia Gorgoepikoos church. The collection increased rapidly. In addition to the purchase of books from private libraries, supervised by Dimitris Postolakas (1,995 volumes), the Library accepted many large donations of books, like one from Christoforos and Konstantinos Sakellarios (5,400 volumes) and one from Markos Renieris (3,401 volumes). In 1842, the Public Library merged with Athens University's library (15,000 volumes), and was housed together with the currency collection at the new building of Otto's University. The first director (then-called "president") was Georgios Kozakis-Typaldos[3] of the newly enlarged institution, retaining the job until 1863. At this time, the Library was enriched with significant donations and with rare foreign language books from all over Europe. With the royal charter of 1866, the two libraries merged, and were administered as the "National Library of Greece". From 1877–1910, its director was Michael Deffner. On 16 March 1888 the foundation stone for a new neoclassical marble building was laid. The building was financed by three Kefallonian-born brothers of the Diaspora, Panagis, Marinos and Andreas Vallianos. It was designed by Baron Theophil von Hansen and its construction supervised by Ernst Ziller. The Library remained in the older University building until 1903, when it was relocated to the new Vallianos building, which still partly houses the Library in addition to two other buildings, at Agia Paraskevi and Nea Halkidona. Holdings[edit] The library has 4,500 Greek manuscripts which is one of the greatest collection of Greek scripts. There are also many chrysobulls and archives of the Greek Revolution. Among the library's holdings are a codex of the four Gospels attributed to the scribe Matthew; uncial codex with a fragment Gospel of Matthew from 6th century (Uncial 094), Flora Graeca Sibthorpiana by English botanist John Sibthorp; Rigas' Chart by Rigas Velestinlis; The Large Etymological Dictionary, a historic Byzantine dictionary; and the first publication of Homer's epics and hymns.[4] Some other manuscripts: Uncial 075, Uncial 0161, Minuscule 798. Relocation to Phaleron Bay[edit] New Building of National Library of Greece in Stavros Niarchos Foundation Cultural Center The present building has long been inconvenient due to limited space and technology demands. Although the Vallianos building will continue to house some of its current functions, the bulk of the library in 2018 was relocated to a new 22,000-square meter building at the Stavros Niarchos Foundation Cultural Center on the Phaleron Bay "Delta". The 20-hectare Delta is a seafront area that used to host the Athens horse race track, which was replaced by the Markopoulo Olympic Equestrian Centre for the Athens 2004 Olympics. Italian architect Renzo Piano proposed a radical new plan for the National Library and the National Opera of Greece, and the project was funded by the Stavros Niarchos Foundation and donated to the Greek state. The twin buildings are integrated within a landscaped park with indigenous Mediterranean flora, and feature extensive renewable energy facilities and a central plaza around a 30-m wide seawater channel. Work on the project started in 2012 with completion due for 2016.[5] See also[edit] List of national libraries References[edit] ^ "nlg.gr". Archived from the original on 16 June 2016. Retrieved 16 June 2016. ^ Dean H. Keller (1993). Academic Libraries in Greece: The Present Situation and Future Prospects. Psychology Press. p. 26. ISBN 978-1-56024-365-6. Retrieved 5 December 2012. The National Library of Greece was founded in 1832 by Ioannis Kapodistrias, the first governor of the Greek state. ^ Εθνική Βιβλιοθήκη της Ελλάδος «Ιστορικά στοιχεία» [1] Archived 8 July 2015 at the Wayback Machine, retrieved 6 July 2015 ^ "Treasures - National Library of Greece". The European Library. ^ (in Greek) Γιάννης Ε. Στάμος (25 April 2014). "Λυρική και Βιβλιοθήκη παραδίδονται το 2016". Ελευθεροτυπία. Retrieved 17 June 2014 External links[edit] Wikimedia Commons has media related to National Library of Greece. Εθνική Βιβλιοθήκη της Ελλάδος (in Greek) National Library of Greece (in English) v t e National libraries of Europe Sovereign states Albania Andorra Armenia Austria Azerbaijan Belarus Belgium Bosnia and Herzegovina Bulgaria Croatia Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Georgia Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Italy Kazakhstan Latvia Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Malta Moldova Monaco Montenegro Netherlands North Macedonia Norway Poland Portugal Romania Russia San Marino Serbia Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey Ukraine United Kingdom Vatican City States with limited recognition Abkhazia Artsakh Kosovo Northern Cyprus South Ossetia Transnistria Dependencies and other entities Åland Faroe Islands Gibraltar Guernsey Isle of Man Jersey Svalbard Other entities European Union v t e Major landmarks of Athens Ancient Acropolis Ancient Agora Arch of Hadrian Areopagus Aristotle’s Lyceum Hadrian's Library Kerameikos Monument of Lysicrates Odeon of Herodes Atticus Panathenaic Stadium Philopappos Hill/Monument Platonic Academy Pnyx Remains of the Acharnian Road, Acharnian Gate and Cemetery Site Remains of the Long Walls Roman Agora Stoa of Attalos Temple of Hephaestus Temple of Olympian Zeus Theatre of Dionysus Tower of the Winds Byzantine Little Metropolis Daphni Monastery Holy Apostles Church Kapnikarea Church Pantanassa Church Holy Trinity Church Ottoman Fethiye Mosque House of Saint Philothei/Benizelos-Palaiologos mansion Tzistarakis Mosque Modern Hansen's "Trilogy" Academy Kapodistrian University of Athens National Library of Greece Museums Acropolis Museum Benaki Museum Byzantine and Christian Museum Museum of Cycladic Art Kerameikos Museum National Archaeological Museum National Gallery National Historical Museum Numismatic Museum Churches Metropolitan Cathedral of Athens Cathedral Basilica of St. Dionysius the Areopagite Gardens/Parks Lycabettus Hill National Gardens Pedion tou Areos Squares and Neighbourhoods Anafiotika Kolonaki Square Kotzia Square Monastiraki Omonoia Square Plaka Syntagma Thiseio Tomb of the Unknown Soldier Athens Concert Hall Athens Towers Gennadius Library National Observatory of Athens National Theatre Old Parliament House Old Royal Palace Olympic Sports Complex Presidential Mansion Stavros Niarchos Foundation Cultural Center Zappeion Marinas Agios Kosmas Marina Alimos Marina Athens Marina (formerly Faliro Marina) Glyfada Marina Olympic Marine Marina of Vouliagmeni Marina of Zea Others Dionysiou Areopagitou Street Ermou Street First Cemetery of Athens Authority control BNF: cb122654110 (data) GND: 1081560-0 ISNI: 0000 0001 2165 7755 LCCN: n85048742 NKC: ko2017950608 NLA: 36041076 NLG: 56503 SUDOC: 031439756 ULAN: 500306495 VcBA: 494/36680 VIAF: 136996034 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n85048742 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Library_of_Greece&oldid=961735928" Categories: National Library of Greece 1832 establishments in Greece Libraries in Athens Landmarks in Athens Libraries established in 1832 Tourist attractions in Athens Library buildings completed in 1903 Theophil Hansen buildings Neoclassical architecture in Greece Ioannis Kapodistrias Hidden categories: Webarchive template wayback links Articles with Greek-language sources (el) Use dmy dates from January 2020 Infobox mapframe without OSM relation ID on Wikidata Articles containing Greek-language text Commons category link from Wikidata Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLG identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with ULAN identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Pages using the Kartographer extension Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Languages Afrikaans العربية Azərbaycanca Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ Български Català Deutsch Ελληνικά Español Esperanto فارسی Français Galego 한국어 Հայերեն Italiano עברית مصرى Polski Português Română Русский Shqip Simple English Српски / srpski Suomi Türkçe Українська 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 10 June 2020, at 03:51 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1150 ---- The Rape of the Lock - Wikipedia The Rape of the Lock From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search 1712 mock-heroic poem by Alexander Pope Arabella Fermor, a 19th-century print after Sir Peter Lely's portrait of her The Rape of the Lock is a mock-heroic narrative poem written by Alexander Pope.[1] One of the most commonly cited examples of high burlesque, it was first published anonymously in Lintot's Miscellaneous Poems and Translations (May 1712) in two cantos (334 lines); a revised edition "Written by Mr. Pope" followed in March 1714 as a five-canto version (794 lines) accompanied by six engravings. Pope boasted that this sold more than three thousand copies in its first four days.[2] The final form of the poem appeared in 1717 with the addition of Clarissa's speech on good humour. The poem was much translated and contributed to the growing popularity of mock-heroic in Europe. Contents 1 Description 2 Dedicatory letter 3 Summary 4 Translations 5 Parody and interpretation 6 Influence 7 References 8 External links Description[edit] The poem satirises a small incident by comparing it to the epic world of the gods. It was based on an actual event recounted to the poet by Pope's friend, John Caryll. Arabella Fermor and her suitor, Lord Petre, were both from aristocratic recusant Catholic families, at a time in England when, under such laws as the Test Act, all denominations except Anglicanism suffered legal restrictions and penalties. (For example, Petre, being a Catholic, could not take the place in the House of Lords that would otherwise have been rightfully his.) Petre had cut off a lock of Arabella's hair without permission, and the consequent argument had created a breach between the two families. The poem's title does not refer to the extreme of sexual rape, but to an earlier definition of the word derived from the Latin rapere (supine stem raptum), "to snatch, to grab, to carry off"[3][4]—in this case, the theft and carrying away of a lock of hair. In terms of the sensibilities of the age, however, even this non-consensual personal invasion might be interpreted as bringing dishonour. Pope, also a Catholic, wrote the poem at the request of friends in an attempt to "comically merge the two" worlds, the heroic with the social. He utilised the character Belinda to represent Arabella and introduced an entire system of “sylphs”, or guardian spirits of virgins, a parodised version of the gods and goddesses of conventional epic. Pope derived his sylphs from the 17th-century French Rosicrucian novel Comte de Gabalis.[5] Pope, writing pseudonymously as Esdras Barnivelt, also published A Key to the Lock in 1714 as a humorous warning against taking the poem too seriously.[6] "The New Star", illustration by Aubrey Beardsley for The Rape of the Lock Pope's poem uses the traditional high stature of classical epics to emphasise the triviality of the incident. The abduction of Helen of Troy becomes here the theft of a lock of hair; the gods become minute sylphs; the description of Achilles' shield becomes an excursus on one of Belinda's petticoats. He also uses the epic style of invocations, lamentations, exclamations and similes, and in some cases adds parody to imitation by following the framework of actual speeches in Homer's Iliad. Although the poem is humorous at times, Pope keeps a sense that beauty is fragile, and emphasizes that the loss of a lock of hair touches Belinda deeply. The humour of the poem comes from the storm in a teacup being couched within the elaborate, formal verbal structure of an epic poem. It is a satire on contemporary society which showcases the lifestyle led by some people of that age. Pope arguably satirises it from within rather than looking down judgmentally on the characters. Belinda's legitimate rage is thus alleviated and tempered by her good humour, as directed by the character Clarissa.[7] Dedicatory letter[edit] Pope added to the second edition the following dedicatory letter to Mrs. Arabella Fermor: Madam, It will be in vain to deny that I have some regard for this piece, since I dedicate it to You. Yet you may bear me witness, it was intended only to divert a few young Ladies, who have good sense and good humour enough to laugh not only at their sex's little unguarded follies, but at their own. But as it was communicated with the air of a secret, it soon found its way into the world. An imperfect copy having been offered to a Bookseller, you had the good nature for my sake to consent to the publication of one more correct: This I was forced to, before I had executed half my design, for the Machinery was entirely wanting to complete it. The Machinery, Madam, is a term invented by the Critics, to signify that part which the Deities, Angels, or Dæmons are made to act in a poem: For the ancient poets are in one respect like many modern ladies: let an action be never so trivial in itself, they always make it appear of the utmost importance. These Machines I determined to raise on a very new and odd foundation, the Rosicrucian doctrine of Spirits. I know how disagreeable it is to make use of hard words before a lady; but 'tis so much the concern of a poet to have his works understood and particularly by your sex, that you must give me leave to explain two or three difficult terms. The Rosicrucians are the people I must bring you acquainted with. The best account I know of them is in a French book called Le Comte de Gabalis, which both in its title and size is so like a novel, that many of the fair sex have read it for one by mistake. According to these gentlemen, the four elements are inhabited by spirits, which they call Sylphs, Gnomes, Nymphs, and Salamanders. The Gnomes or Dæmons of Earth delight in mischief; but the Sylphs, whose habitation is in the air, are the best-conditioned creatures imaginable. For they say, any mortals may enjoy the most intimate familiarities with these gentle spirits, upon a condition very easy to all true adepts, an inviolate preservation of Chastity. As to the following Cantos, all the passages of them are as fabulous as the Vision at the beginning or the Transformation at the end; (except the loss of your Hair, which I always mention with reverence). The human persons are as fictitious as the airy ones, and the character of Belinda, as it is now managed, resembles you in nothing but in Beauty. Summary[edit] Belinda sails down the Thames to Hampton Court attended by sylphs; a copperplate engraving by Anna Maria Werner (1744) In the beginning of this mock-epic, Pope declares that a "dire offence" (Canto 1 line 1) has been committed. A lord has assaulted a "gentle belle" (line 8), causing her to reject him. He then proceeds to tell the story of this offence. While Belinda is still asleep, her guardian Sylph Ariel forewarns her that "some dread event impends". Belinda then awakes and gets ready for the day with the help of her maid, Betty. The Sylphs, though unseen, also contribute: "These set the head, and those divide the hair, some fold the sleeve, whilst others plait the gown" (146–147). Here Pope also describes Belinda's two locks of hair "which graceful hung behind". The Baron, one of Belinda's suitors, greatly admires these locks and conspires to steal one. Building an altar, he places on it "all the trophies of his former loves" (line 40), sets them on fire and fervently prays "soon to obtain, and long possess" (line 44) the lock. Ariel, disturbed by the impending event although not knowing what it will be, summons many sylphs to her and instructs them to guard Belinda from anything that may befall her, whether she "forget her prayers, or miss a masquerade, Or lost her heart, or necklace, at a ball" (line 108–109). So protected, Belinda arrives at Hampton Court and is invited to play a game of ombre. The conspiring Baron acquires a pair of scissors and tries to snip off one of her locks, but he is prevented by the watchful Sylphs. This happens three times, but in the end the Baron succeeds (also cutting a Sylph in two although Pope reassures us, parodying a passage in Paradise Lost, that "airy substance soon unites again" [line 152]). When Belinda discovers her lock is gone, she falls into a tantrum, while the Baron celebrates his victory. A gnome named Umbriel now journeys to the Cave of Spleen and from the Queen receives a bag of "sighs, sobs, and passions, and the war of tongues" (canto 4 line 84) and a vial filled "with fainting fears, soft sorrows, melting griefs, and flowing tears" (line 85–86) and brings them to Belinda. Finding her dejected in the arms of the woman Thalestris, Umbriel pours the contents over them both. Many people, moved by Belinda's grief, demand the lock back, but the Baron is unrepentant and refuses. Clarissa admonishes them to keep their good humour, but they will not listen and instead a battle ensues with glares, songs and wits as weapons. Belinda fights with the Baron and throws snuff up his nose to subdue him. When she demands that he restore the lock, however, it is nowhere to be found. It has been made a constellation and is destined to outlast the contestants. Translations[edit] Translations of the poem into French, Italian and German were all made in the first half of the 18th century. Others in those languages followed later, as well as in Dutch, Czech, Estonian, Hungarian, Polish, Swedish and Danish.[8] The work had originally come to European notice through an anonymous prose version, La Boucle de Cheveux Enlevée, published anonymously in 1728[9] and now ascribed either to Marthe-Marguerite, Marquise de Caylus, or to Pierre Desfontaines. Despite there being a playful French model for this kind of writing in Boileau's Lutrin, the translator claims of Pope's work in the preface that "I do not believe that there can be found in our language anything more ingenious, in this playful genre."[10] A verse translation by Jean-François Marmontel followed in 1746.[11] Der Lockenraub, the 1744 German translation of Pope's poem by Luise Gottsched The first German translation, Der merckwürdige Haar-Locken-Raub (1739), was a rendering of the French prose version of 1728. Luise Gottsched's verse translation, Der Lockenraub, was begun in the 1730s, again using a French prose version. However, she revised it totally once she managed to obtain the original text in English and in this way pioneered an interest in English literature in the German-language area. From then on, "Pope became very popular as a model for German poets from the 1750s onwards and remained an important source of inspiration throughout the second half of the 18th century," and in particular as a model for mock heroic poetry.[12] Early Italian verse translations of the poem include Andrea Bonducci's Il Riccio Rapito (Florence 1739), followed by Antonio Schinella Conti's version, begun much earlier and finally published in Venice in 1751.[13] The vogue for Pope's work went on to blossom at the start of the 19th century with separate translations by Federico Federici (Faziola 1819),[14] Vincenzo Benini (Milan 1819),[15] Sansone Uzielli (Livorno 1822),[16] and Antonio Beduschi (Milan 1830).[17] Scandinavian versions appeared near the start of the 19th century, beginning with the Swedish Våldet på Belindas låck (Stockholm, 1797) by Johan Lorens Odhelius (1737–1816). It was followed in 1819 by Den bortröfvade hårlocken by Jonas Magnus Stjernstolpe (1777–1831), and by the Danish imitation Belinde, eller den røvede Haarlok by Anton Martini (1773–1847) in 1829.[18] Parody and interpretation[edit] In 1717 Giles Jacob published his bawdy parody, The Rape of the Smock, the plot of which turns on voyeurism and enforced seduction,[19] building on erotic undertones present in Pope's poem which were to be taken up by its illustrators, and reached an apotheosis in Aubrey Beardsley's work.[20] The 1714 edition of The Rape of the Lock and those that followed from Lintot's press had come with six woodcuts designed by Louis Du Guernier.[21] Although the work of this artist has been described as unimaginative,[22] he goes beyond his literal brief in making Belinda sleep in unwarranted décolletage in the first canto, while in the second giving the "painted vessel" on its way down the Thames the tilted perspective of the Ship of Fools. Furthermore, Du Guernier's frontispiece owes its iconography to a print by Étienne Baudet after a painting by Francesco Albani of Venus at her Toilette, making for an identification of Belinda with the goddess.[23] The German translation of the poem published from Leipzig in 1744 had five copperplate engravings by Anna Maria Werner (1689–1753), the court painter of Saxony.[24] It has been observed, however, that the places they depict are not specifically English and that the scene of the game of ombre in Canto 3 is "clearly based on a Leipzig coffee-house", complete with lapdogs tumbling on the floor.[25] Sir Plume demands the restoration of the lock, an oil painting by Charles Robert Leslie, 1854 Meanwhile, in Britain most illustrations of the work were descending into "high kitsch and low camp".[26] The 1798 edition, for example, illustrated by a variety of contemporary artists, is particularly noted now for Thomas Stothard's watercolour in which fairies are pictured with wings. Advised by William Blake to make the sylphs like butterflies, Stothard decided to "paint the wing from the butterfly itself" and immediately went out to catch one.[27] Oil paintings by two artists rise a little above this judgment. Henry Fuseli's erotic The Dream of Belinda (1789–1790) goes beyond the actual episode to incorporate other imagery from the poem and some details peculiar only to Fuseli, such as the white moths in copulation in the lower foreground.[28] He also illustrated the Cave of Spleen episode from Canto 4, but this met with contemporary scepticism[29] and the original is now lost.[30] Only Thomas Holloway's print remains to suggest that critics might have been right in seeing in it more "burlesque than sublimity".[31] In the following century, Charles Robert Leslie's 1854 period piece, Sir Plume Demands the Restoration of the Lock, takes place in a cluttered drawing room in which the kind of lap dog present in many previous pictures feeds from a dish on the floor. The nine photo-engravings with which Aubrey Beardsley "embroidered" the 1896 edition of the poem[32] drew on the French rococo style, in which there was a contemporary revival of interest.[33] Well received at the time, their enduring popularity can be attributed to their reinterpreting of the poem in ways only a very few had managed earlier. Influence[edit] Pope's fanciful conclusion to his work, translating the stolen lock into the sky, where "'midst the stars [it] inscribes Belinda's name", contributed to the eventual naming of three of the moons of Uranus after characters from The Rape of the Lock: Umbriel, Ariel, and Belinda. The first two are major bodies and were named in 1852 by John Herschel, a year after their discovery. The inner satellite Belinda was not discovered until 1986 and is the only other of the planet's 27 moons taken from Pope's poem rather than Shakespeare's works. Modern adaptations of The Rape of the Lock include Deborah Mason's opera-ballet, on which the composer worked since 2002.[34] It had its premiere as an opera-oratorio in June 2016, performed by the Spectrum Symphony of New York and the New York Baroque Dance Company.[35][36] There had also been a 2006 performance at Sheffield University's Drama Studio of a musical work based on Pope's poem composed by Jenny Jackson.[37] References[edit] ^ Text online from Adelaide University ^ Sherburn, G., Eed. Correspondence of Alexander Pope, Oxford University Press, 1956, I, 201. ^ Corinne J. Saunders, Rape and Ravishment in the Literature of Medieval England, Boydell & Brewer, 2001, p. 20. ^ Keith Burgess-Jackson, A Most Detestable Crime: New Philosophical Essays on Rape, Oxford University Press, New York, 1999, p. 16. ^ Seeber, Edward D. (1944). "Sylphs and Other Elemental Beings in French Literature since Le Comte de Gabalis (1670)". PMLA. 59 (1): 71–83. doi:10.2307/458845. JSTOR 458845. ^ "A key to the lock: Or, a treatise proving, beyond all contradiction, the dangerous tendency of a late poem, entituled, The rape of the lock, to government and religion". ^ Ijaz, Muhammad. "RiseNotes-Rape of the Lock". www.risenotes.com. ^ Pat Rogers, The Alexander Pope Encyclopedia, Greenwood Press 2004, p.242 ^ Pope, Alexander; DESFONTAINES, Pierre François GUYOT; Caylus.), Marthe Marguerite Hippolyte de TUBIÈRES DE GRIMOARD DE PESTELS DE LEVIS (Marchioness de (24 August 2018). "La Boucle de Cheveux enlevée; poëme héroï-comique de Monsieur Pope. Traduit [in prose] de l'Anglois par Mr. ** [i.e. P. F. Guyot Desfontaines]". F. Le Breton – via Google Books. ^ Alexander Pope: The Critical Heritage, Routledge 1995, ch.23 ^ Available in Google Books,p.93ff ^ Hilary Brown, introduction to the MHRA reprint, London 2014 ^ Giuseppe Parinis Il Giorno im Kontext der europäischen Aufklärung, Würzburg 2006, p.236 ^ Pope, Alexander (24 August 2018). "Il Riccio rapito, di Alessandro Pope, traduzione di Federico Federici, ..." Stamp. Faziola – via Google Books. ^ Pope, Alexander (24 August 2018). "Il riccio rapito ; tradotto ed illustrato da G. Vincenzo Benini". Bettoni – via Google Books. ^ Pope, Alexander (24 August 2018). "Il riccio rapito". G. Masi – via Google Books. ^ Pope, Alexander (24 August 2018). "Il Riccio Rapito ... tradotto da A. Beduschi". Soc. tip. de'classici italiani – via Google Books. ^ "Dansk oversættelse af Alexander Popes "The rape of the Lock"". biblioteksvagten.dk. ^ "The Rape of the Smock. An Heroi-comic Poem. In Two Cantos. [By Giles Jacob.]". J. Brown. 24 August 1768 – via Google Books. ^ Barbara M. Benedict, Curiosity: A Cultural History of Early Modern Inquiry, University of Chicago 2002, pp.79-81 ^ Pope, Alexander. "The Rape of the Lock" – via Wikisource. ^ Morris R. Brownell, Eighteenth-Century Studies 16.1, 1982, p.91 ^ Timothy Erwin, Textual Vision: Augustan Design and the Invention of Eighteenth-Century British Culture, Bucknell University 2015, pp.17-58 ^ "A new audience for Pope - Simon Beattie". www.simonbeattie.kattare.com. ^ Hilary Brown's introduction to Luise Gottsched, Der Lockenraub, MHRA 2014, p.12 ^ Robert Halsband, The Rape of the Lock and its Illustrations, OUP 1980, p.77 ^ Jayne Elizabeth Lewis, Air's Appearance: Literary Atmosphere in British Fiction, 1660-1794, University of Chicago 2012, p.88 ^ Vancouver Art Gallery, p.4 ^ Luisa Cale, Fuseli's Milton Gallery, Oxford 2006, p.56 ^ "The Cave of Spleen, with Umbriel Receiving from the Goddess the Bag and Vial". British Museum. ^ "The Cave of Spleen, with Umbriel Receiving from the Goddess the Bag and Vial". British Museum. ^ "The Rape of the Lock". ebooks.adelaide.edu.au. ^ "Favourite Find: Aubrey Beardsley's illustrations for 'The Rape of the Lock'". 19 July 2013. ^ "the rape of the lock opera". debmasonstudio.com. ^ ""Alexander Pope's The Rape of the Lock" Opera-Oratorio by Deborah Mason". ^ A performance of the last act is available on YouTube ^ Sheffield, University of. "All that jazz… with a bit of opera and theatre mixed in - Latest - News - The University of Sheffield". www.sheffield.ac.uk. External links[edit] Wikisource has original text related to this article: The Rape of the Lock Wikimedia Commons has media related to The Rape of the Lock. The Rape of the Lock at the Eighteenth-Century Poetry Archive (ECPA) The Rape of the Lock: Study Guide With Complete Text and Detailed Explanatory Notes The Rape of the Lock: Study Guide,Summary, Selected Quotes, Themes and Detailed Explanatory Notes The Rape of the Lock and Other Poems at Project Gutenberg The Rape of the Lock public domain audiobook at LibriVox v t e Alexander Pope Plays Three Hours After Marriage (1717) Essays "Peri Bathous, Or the Art of Sinking in Poetry" (1727) Poetry "Ode on Solitude" (1700) An Essay on Criticism (1711) Messiah (English poem) (1712) The Rape of the Lock (1712) The Temple of Fame (1715) Eloisa to Abelard (1717) "Elegy to the Memory of an Unfortunate Lady" (1717) Messiah (Latin poem) (1728) The Dunciad (1728–29, 1742–43) An Essay on Man (1734) Moral Essays (1731-35) Epistle to Dr Arbuthnot (1735) Related Popeswood Binfield Scriblerus Club Memoirs of Martinus Scriblerus "Who breaks a butterfly upon a wheel?" Heroic couplet People Martha Blount John Caryll v t e Homer's Iliad (8th century BC) Characters Achaeans Acamas Achilles Agamemnon (king of Mycenae) Agapenor Ajax the Greater (king of Salamis) Ajax the Lesser Alcimus Anticlus Antilochus Arcesilaus Ascalaphus Automedon Balius and Xanthus Bias Calchas (prophet) Diomedes (king of Argos) Elephenor Epeius Eudoros Euryalus Eurybates Eurydamas Eurypylus Guneus Helen (queen of Sparta) Ialmenus Idomeneus (king of Crete) Iphigenia (princess of Mycenae) Leitus Leonteus Lycomedes Machaon Medon Meges Menelaus (king of Sparta) Menestheus Meriones Neoptolemus Nestor (king of Pylos) Nireus Odysseus (king of Ithaca) Palamedes Patroclus Peneleos Philoctetes Phoenix Podalirius Podarces Polites Polypoetes Promachus Protesilaus Prothoenor Schedius Sinon Stentor Sthenelus Talthybius Teucer Thersites Thoas Thrasymedes Tlepolemus Trojans Aeneas (royal demigod) Aesepus Agenor Alcathous Amphimachus Anchises Andromache Antenor (king's brother-in-law) Antiphates Antiphus Archelochus Asius Asteropaios Astyanax Atymnius Axylus Briseis Calesius Caletor Cassandra (princess of Troy) Chryseis Chryses (priest of Apollo) Clytius Coön Dares Phrygius Deiphobus (prince of Troy) Dolon Epistrophus Euphemus Euphorbus Glaucus Gorgythion Hector (prince of Troy) Hecuba (queen of Troy) Helenus Hyperenor Hypsenor Ilioneus Imbrius Iphidamas Kebriones Laocoön Lycaon (prince of Troy) Melanippus Mentes Mydon Mygdon of Phrygia Othryoneus Pandarus Panthous Paris (prince of Troy) Pedasus Peirous Phorcys Polites Polydamas Polybus Polydorus (prince of Troy) Polyxena (princess of Troy) Priam (king of Troy) Pylaemenes Pylaeus Pyraechmes Rhesus of Thrace Sarpedon (king of Lycia) Theano Ucalegon Major deities Aphrodite Apollo Ares Artemis Athena Hades Hephaestus Hera Hermes Poseidon Zeus Minor deities Deimos Eris Iris Leto Phobos Proteus Scamander Thetis Sections Catalogue of Ships Deception of Zeus Trojan Battle Order Study Homeric scholarship Homeric Question Chorizontes Historicity of the Homeric epics "The Iliad or the Poem of Force" (1939 essay) Milawata letter Rediscovering Homer Dactylic hexameter Parallels between Virgil's Aeneid and Homer's Iliad and Odyssey Manuscripts Ambrosian Iliad Codex Nitriensis Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 20 Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 21 Uncial 098 Venetus A Venetus B Alternate versions Ilias Latina (60–70 CE) Dictys Cretensis Ephemeridos belli Trojani (4th century ?) Daretis Phrygii de excidio Trojae historia (5th century) Hermoniakos' Iliad (14th century) Men in Aida (1983) Translation English translations of Homer "On First Looking into Chapman's Homer" On Translating Homer Literature Verse Priapea 68 De bello Troiano (1183) The Rape of the Lock (1712) "The Shield of Achilles" (1952) War Music (1959) Omeros (1990) Novels The Firebrand (1987) Black Ships Before Troy (1993) Troy (2000) Ilium (2003) Ransom (2009) Starcrossed (2011) Stage Rhesus (5th century BC play) The Trojan War Will Not Take Place (Tiger at the Gates) (1935) The Golden Apple (1954 musical) Films Helena (1924) Helen of Troy (1956) The Trojan Horse (1961) Troy (2004) Television The Myth Makers (1965) In Search of the Trojan War (1985) Helen of Troy (2003 miniseries) Troy: Fall of a City (2018 miniseries) Music King Priam (1961 Tippett opera) The Triumph of Steel (1992 album) "And Then There Was Silence" (2001 song) The Odyssey (Smith symphony) Art Tabula iliaca The Apotheosis of Homer The Ambassadors of Agamemnon in the tent of Achilles The Loves of Paris and Helen Menelaus supporting the body of Patroclus Orestes Pursued by the Furies The Revelers Vase Statue of Zeus at Olympia Phrases "Ever to Excel" "Hold your horses" "In medias res" "Noblesse oblige" Other Warriors: Legends of Troy (video game) Age of Bronze (comics) Sortes Homericae Heraclitus Weighing of souls Where Troy Once Stood Blood rain Authority control GND: 4130168-7 VIAF: 200836820 WorldCat Identities (via VIAF): 200836820 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Rape_of_the_Lock&oldid=995423839" Categories: Narrative poems Parodies 1712 poems Works by Alexander Pope Roman à clef novels Mock-heroic English poems Hidden categories: CS1: Julian–Gregorian uncertainty Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata EngvarB from September 2013 Use dmy dates from September 2013 Commons category link from Wikidata Articles with Project Gutenberg links Articles with LibriVox links Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WorldCat-VIAF identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikisource Languages Cymraeg Deutsch Español Français Italiano മലയാളം 日本語 Norsk bokmål Română Simple English Edit links This page was last edited on 20 December 2020, at 23:36 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1151 ---- Category:Pages using Sister project links with wikidata namespace mismatch - Wikipedia Help Category:Pages using Sister project links with wikidata namespace mismatch From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search This is a tracking category. It is used to build and maintain lists of pages—primarily for the sake of the lists themselves and their use in article and category maintenance. It is not part of the encyclopedia's categorization scheme. Pages in this category have a wikidata item which has a different namespace than the corresponding parameter More information: This category is hidden on its member pages—unless the corresponding user preference is set. These categories are used to track, build and organize lists of pages needing "attention en masse" (for example, pages using deprecated syntax), or that may need to be edited at someone's earliest convenience. These categories also serve to aggregate members of several lists or sub-categories into a larger, more efficient list (discriminated by classifications). Pages in category "Pages using Sister project links with wikidata namespace mismatch" The following 200 pages are in this category, out of approximately 687 total. This list may not reflect recent changes (learn more). (previous page) (next page)B C++ Microsoft Windows Programming language Spanish language C 59th National Film Awards 60th National Film Awards 61st National Film Awards 1906 Atlantic hurricane season 2006 Atlantic hurricane season 2006 Pacific hurricane season 2006 Pacific typhoon season Aces & Eights Adam Weishaupt Adobe Photoshop Advertising Akhenaten Al Franken Aladdin Malikov Albrecht Altdorfer Alexander Graham Bell Alexis Dziena Alice's Adventures in Wonderland Alicia Silverstone Allan Octavian Hume Alyssa Milano Amanda Tapping Ambigram American Horror Story American Samoa Amy Adams Amy Klobuchar Andrew Wiles Android (robot) Angelo Bacchetta Anime Anklam Anthony Kiedis Anton Chekhov April Fools' Day Arc de Triomphe Arctic Monkeys Arthropod Artie Lange ASIMO Asteroid mining Asthma Aung San Suu Kyi Autherine Lucy Automation Autonomous Republic of Crimea Autumn Avaya Ayaan Hirsi Ali B. R. Ambedkar Bad Kreuznach Badminton Baháʼu'lláh Bali Bank Banksy Baranagar Baranagore Ramakrishna Mission Ashrama High School Basshunter Bathurst, New South Wales Ben Harper Benjamin Harrison Benvenuto Cellini Beowulf Bernie Sanders Bessie Love Betty Buckley Big Bang Bill Cosby Bill Nye Billie Eilish Billy Connolly Billy Ray Cyrus Billy the Kid Black hole Black Swan (film) Blacksmith Blink-182 Bob Dylan Bobby Fischer Book of Jeremiah Borscht Bouvet Island Brad Pitt Bradley Cooper Brandon Flowers Brandon Hardesty Brian Michael Bendis Bright Eyes (band) Brigitte Bardot Britney Spears Bronze Burning Man Business software Busy Philipps Buttonwillow, California C. S. Lewis Cairns Cape Verde Carl von Clausewitz Carlo Martini Carlos Slim Carmen Electra Carrie Preston Carrie Underwood Cartography Catherine Ringer Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge Céline Bara Celine Dion Charles Dickens Charles Evans Hughes Charles Meryon Charles Sanders Peirce Charles, Prince of Wales Charlie Chaplin Charlize Theron Chesty Puller Chris Cornell Chris Evans (presenter) Chris Jericho Chris Masters Chris Patten Christopher Marlowe Chupacabra Citizen Kane Claude Debussy Coldplay Columbus, Ohio Computing Conan O'Brien Conan the Barbarian Confucius Cory Doctorow Counting Crows Crash Landing on You Crater Lake National Park Cricket Cuyahoga Valley National Park Cycling Cyrano de Bergerac Dalida Damaris (singer) Daniel Dennett Dante Gabriel Rossetti Darren Aronofsky Daryl Hannah David Bowie David Fincher David Lynch Death Death Cab for Cutie Demi Lovato Dennis Lehane Dhir Shamsher Rana Diana, Princess of Wales Diane Keaton Dietrich Bonhoeffer Dimetrodon Disc golf Dita Von Teese DJ Shadow Doris Day Dr. John Drew Carey Duck Dwayne Johnson Easter Island École d'ingénieurs de Purpan Edmonton El Greco Elf Elia Kazan Elijah Cummings Elijah Wood Eliza Dushku Eliza Humphreys Elizabeth Warren Elvis Costello Emina Jahović Emma Roberts Emoji Empire State Building Enrico Nigiotti Equatorial Guinea Erykah Badu Eswatini Eugene V. Debs Everglades National Park Evo Morales Ewa Sonnet Fanny Crosby Federal Reserve Felicity Jones Feminism Firefly (TV series) (previous page) (next page) Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Pages_using_Sister_project_links_with_wikidata_namespace_mismatch&oldid=996030512" Hidden categories: Hidden categories Tracking category for Sister project links Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Category Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Add links This page was last edited on 24 December 2020, at 03:57 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-115 ---- Platonic Academy - Wikipedia Platonic Academy From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Ancient philosophical, research and educative center, founded by Plato This article is about the academy founded by Plato. For the 15th-century school in Florence, see Platonic Academy (Florence). For the Raphael painting, see The School of Athens. "Akademia" redirects here. For the French early music ensemble, see Akadêmia. Coordinates: 37°59′33″N 23°42′29″E / 37.99250°N 23.70806°E / 37.99250; 23.70806 Part of a series on Platonism Plato from Raphael's The School of Athens (1509–1511) Early life Works Epistemology Idealism / realism Demiurge Theory of forms Theory of soul Transcendentals Form of the Good Third man argument Euthyphro dilemma Five regimes Philosopher king Plato's unwritten doctrines political philosophy Allegories and metaphors Atlantis Ring of Gyges The Cave The Divided Line The Sun Ship of State Myth of Er The Chariot Related articles Commentaries The Academy in Athens Socratic problem Academic skepticism Middle Platonism Neoplatonism and Christianity Allegorical interpretations of Plato Related categories ► Plato  Philosophy portal v t e Plato's Academy mosaic — from the Villa of T. Siminius Stephanus in Pompeii. The Academy (Ancient Greek: Ἀκαδημία) was founded by Plato in c. 387 BC in Athens. Aristotle studied there for twenty years (367–347 BC) before founding his own school, the Lyceum. The Academy persisted throughout the Hellenistic period as a skeptical school, until coming to an end after the death of Philo of Larissa in 83 BC. The Platonic Academy was destroyed by the Roman dictator Sulla in 86 BC.[1] Contents 1 Site 1.1 Today 2 History 2.1 The three Platonic eras 2.1.1 Old Academy 2.1.2 Middle Academy 2.1.3 New Academy 2.2 Destruction of the Academy 3 Neoplatonic Academy 4 See also 5 Notes 6 References 7 External links Site[edit] Ancient road to the Academy. Map of Ancient Athens. The Academy is north of Athens. The Akademia was a school outside the city walls of ancient Athens. It was located in or beside a grove of olive trees dedicated to the goddess Athena,[2] which was on the site even before Cimon enclosed the precincts with a wall.[3] The archaic name for the site was Ἑκαδήμεια (Hekademia), which by classical times evolved into Ἀκαδημία (Akademia), which was explained, at least as early as the beginning of the 6th century BC, by linking it to "Akademos", a legendary Athenian hero. The site of the Academy was sacred to Athena; it had sheltered her religious cult since the Bronze Age. The site was perhaps also associated with the twin hero-gods Castor and Polydeuces (the Dioscuri), since the hero Akademos associated with the site was credited with revealing to the brothers where the abductor Theseus had hidden their sister Helen. Out of respect for its long tradition and its association with the Dioscuri – who were patron gods of Sparta – the Spartan army would not ravage these original "groves of Academe" when they invaded Attica.[4] Their piety was not shared by the Roman Sulla, who had the sacred olive trees of Athena cut down in 86 BC to build siege engines. Among the religious observances that took place at the Akademeia was a torchlit night race from altars within the city to Prometheus' altar in the Akademeia. The road to Akademeia was lined with the gravestones of Athenians, and funeral games also took place in the area as well as a Dionysiac procession from Athens to the Hekademeia and then back to the city.[5][6] The site of the Academy[7] is located near Colonus, approximately 1.5 kilometres (0.93 mi) north of Athens' Dipylon gates.[8] Today[edit] The site was rediscovered in the 20th century, in the modern Akadimia Platonos neighbourhood; considerable excavation has been accomplished and visiting the site is free.[9] Visitors today can visit the archaeological site of the Academy located on either side of the Cratylus street in the area of Colonos and Plato's Academy (Postal Code GR 10442). On either side of the Cratylus street are important monuments, including the Sacred House Geometric Era, the Gymnasium (1st century BC – 1st century AD), the Proto-Helladic Vaulted House and the Peristyle Building (4th century BC), which is perhaps the only major building that belonged to the actual Academy of Plato. History[edit] The area to be Plato's Academy appears to be named after Academus, an Attic hero in Greek mythology. Academus was said to have saved Athens from attack by Troy, revealing where Helen of Troy was hidden, when she had been kidnapped by King Theseus years before the incidents of the later Trojan War. Having thus spared Athens a war (or at least delayed it), Academus was seen as a savior of Athens. His land, six stadia (a total of about one kilometer, or a half mile, the exact length of a stadion varied) north of Athens, became revered even by neighboring city-states, escaping destruction during the many local wars. This piece of land was in historic Greek times adorned with oriental plane and olive plantations[10] and was called Academia after its original owner.[11] What was later to be known as Plato's school appears to have been part of Academia. Plato inherited the property at the age of thirty, with informal gatherings which included Theaetetus of Sunium, Archytas of Tarentum, Leodamas of Thasos, and Neoclides.[12] According to Debra Nails, Speusippus "joined the group in about 390 BC". She claims, "It is not until Eudoxus of Cnidos arrives in the mid-380s BC that Eudemus recognizes a formal Academy." There is no historical record of the exact time the school was officially founded, but modern scholars generally agree that the time was the mid-380s, probably sometime after 387 BC, when Plato is thought to have returned from his first visit to Italy and Sicily.[13] Originally, the meetings were held on Plato's property as often as they were at the nearby Academy gymnasium; this remained so throughout the fourth century.[14] Though the academy was open to the public, the main participants were upper class men.[15][16] It did not, at least during Plato's time, charge fees for membership.[17][15] Therefore, there was probably not at that time a "school" in the sense of a clear distinction between teachers and students, or even a formal curriculum.[18] There was, however, a distinction between senior and junior members.[19] Two women are known to have studied with Plato at the Academy, Axiothea of Phlius and Lasthenia of Mantinea.[20] In at least Plato's time, the school did not have any particular doctrine to teach; rather, Plato (and probably other associates of his) posed problems to be studied and solved by the others.[21] There is evidence of lectures given, most notably Plato's lecture "On the Good"; but probably the use of dialectic was more common.[22] According to an unverifiable story, dated of some 700 years after the founding of the school, above the entrance to the Academy was inscribed the phrase "Let None But Geometers Enter Here."[23] Many have imagined that the Academic curriculum would have closely resembled the one canvassed in Plato's Republic.[24] Others, however, have argued that such a picture ignores the obvious peculiar arrangements of the ideal society envisioned in that dialogue.[25] The subjects of study almost certainly included mathematics as well as the philosophical topics with which the Platonic dialogues deal, but there is little reliable evidence.[26] There is some evidence for what today would be considered strictly scientific research: Simplicius reports that Plato had instructed the other members to discover the simplest explanation of the observable, irregular motion of heavenly bodies: "by hypothesizing what uniform and ordered motions is it possible to save the appearances relating to planetary motions."[27] (According to Simplicius, Plato's colleague Eudoxus was the first to have worked on this problem.) Plato's Academy is often said to have been a school for would-be politicians in the ancient world, and to have had many illustrious alumni.[28] In a recent survey of the evidence, Malcolm Schofield, however, has argued that it is difficult to know to what extent the Academy was interested in practical (i.e., non-theoretical) politics since much of our evidence "reflects ancient polemic for or against Plato".[29] The three Platonic eras[edit] The School of Athens by Raphael (1509–1510), fresco at the Apostolic Palace, Vatican City. Diogenes Laërtius divided the history of the Academy into three: the Old, the Middle, and the New. At the head of the Old he put Plato, at the head of the Middle Academy, Arcesilaus, and of the New, Lacydes. Sextus Empiricus enumerated five divisions of the followers of Plato. He made Plato founder of the first Academy; Arcesilaus of the second; Carneades of the third; Philo and Charmadas of the fourth; and Antiochus of the fifth. Cicero recognised only two Academies, the Old and New, and had the latter commence with Arcesilaus.[30] Old Academy[edit] "Old Academy" redirects here. For the building in Munich, see Old Academy (Munich). Plato's immediate successors as "Scholarch" of the Academy were Speusippus (347–339 BC), Xenocrates (339–314 BC), Polemon (314–269 BC), and Crates (c. 269–266 BC). Other notable members of the Academy include Aristotle, Heraclides, Eudoxus, Philip of Opus, and Crantor. Middle Academy[edit] Around 266 BC Arcesilaus became Scholarch. Under Arcesilaus (c. 266–241 BC), the Academy strongly emphasized a version of Academic skepticism closely similar to Pyrrhonism.[31] Arcesilaus was followed by Lacydes of Cyrene (241–215 BC), Evander and Telecles (jointly) (205 – c. 165 BC), and Hegesinus (c. 160 BC). New Academy[edit] The New or Third Academy begins with Carneades, in 155 BC, the fourth Scholarch in succession from Arcesilaus. It was still largely skeptical, denying the possibility of knowing an absolute truth. Carneades was followed by Clitomachus (129 – c. 110 BC) and Philo of Larissa ("the last undisputed head of the Academy," c. 110–84 BC).[32][33] According to Jonathan Barnes, "It seems likely that Philo was the last Platonist geographically connected to the Academy."[34] Around 90 BC, Philo's student Antiochus of Ascalon began teaching his own rival version of Platonism rejecting Skepticism and advocating Stoicism, which began a new phase known as Middle Platonism. Destruction of the Academy[edit] The archaeological site of Plato's academy. When the First Mithridatic War began in 88 BC, Philo of Larissa left Athens and took refuge in Rome, where he seems to have remained until his death.[35] In 86 BC, Lucius Cornelius Sulla laid siege to Athens and conquered the city, causing much destruction. It was during the siege that he laid waste to the Academy, as Plutarch relates: "He laid hands upon the sacred groves and ravaged the Academy, which was the most wooded of the city's suburbs, as well as the Lyceum."[36] The destruction of the Academy seems to have been so severe as to make the reconstruction and re-opening of the Academy impossible.[37] When Antiochus returned to Athens from Alexandria, c. 84 BC, he resumed his teaching but not in the Academy. Cicero, who studied under him in 79/8 BC, refers to Antiochus teaching in a gymnasium called Ptolemy. Cicero describes a visit to the site of the Academy one afternoon, which was "quiet and deserted at that hour of the day".[38] Neoplatonic Academy[edit] Further information: Decline of Greco-Roman polytheism Despite the Platonic Academy being destroyed in the first century BC, the philosophers continued to teach Platonism in Athens during the Roman era, but it was not until the early 5th century (c. 410) that a revived academy (which had no connection with the original Academy) was established by some leading Neoplatonists.[39] The origins of Neoplatonist teaching in Athens are uncertain, but when Proclus arrived in Athens in the early 430s, he found Plutarch of Athens and his colleague Syrianus teaching in an Academy there. The Neoplatonists in Athens called themselves "successors" (diadochoi, but of Plato) and presented themselves as an uninterrupted tradition reaching back to Plato, but there cannot have actually been any geographical, institutional, economic or personal continuity with the original academy.[40] The school seems to have been a private foundation, conducted in a large house which Proclus eventually inherited from Plutarch and Syrianus.[41] The heads of the Neoplatonic Academy were Plutarch of Athens, Syrianus, Proclus, Marinus, Isidore, and finally Damascius. The Neoplatonic Academy reached its apex under Proclus (died 485). Severianus studied under him. The last "Greek" philosophers of the revived Neoplatonic Academy in the 6th century were drawn from various parts of the Hellenistic cultural world and suggest the broad syncretism of the common culture (see koine): Five of the seven Academy philosophers mentioned by Agathias were Syriac in their cultural origin: Hermias and Diogenes (both from Phoenicia), Isidorus of Gaza, Damascius of Syria, Iamblichus of Coele-Syria and perhaps even Simplicius of Cilicia.[40] In 529 the emperor Justinian ended the funding of the revived Neoplatonic Academy. However, other philosophical schools continued in Constantinople, Antioch, and Alexandria, which were the centres of Justinian's empire.[1] The last Scholarch of the Neoplatonic Academy was Damascius (d. 540). According to Agathias, its remaining members looked for protection under the rule of Sassanid king Khosrau I in his capital at Ctesiphon, carrying with them precious scrolls of literature and philosophy, and to a lesser degree of science. After a peace treaty between the Persian and the Byzantine empire in 532, their personal security (an early document in the history of freedom of religion) was guaranteed. It has been speculated that the Neoplatonic Academy did not altogether disappear.[40][42] After his exile, Simplicius (and perhaps some others) may have travelled to Harran, near Edessa. From there, the students of an Academy-in-exile could have survived into the 9th century, long enough to facilitate an Arabic revival of the Neoplatonist commentary tradition in Baghdad,[42] beginning with the foundation of the House of Wisdom in 832. One of the major centers of learning in the intervening period (6th to 8th centuries) was the Academy of Gundishapur in Sassanid Persia.[clarification needed] See also[edit] Academy of Athens (modern) Cyrenaics Agora Hellenistic philosophy Plato's Academy mosaic Platonic Academy (Florence) Platonism Peripatetic school Stoicism Epicureanism Notes[edit] ^ a b Lindberg, David C. (2007). The Beginnings of Western Science. University of Chicago Press. p. 70. ISBN 9780226482057. ^ Thucydides. ii:34. ^ Plutarch. Life of Cimon, xiii:7. ^ Plutarch. Life of Theseus, xxxii. ^ Pausanias. Description of Greece, i, 29.2, 30.2 ^ Plutarch. Life of Solon, i, 7. ^ Herbert Ernest Cushma. (1910). A Beginner's History of Philosophy, Volume 1, p. 219. Houghton Mifflin. ^ Ainian, A.M. & Alexandridou, A. (2007). "The 'sacred house' of the Academy Revisited". Acts of an International Symposium in Memory of William D. E. Coulson. Volos, Greece: University of Thessaly.] ^ greeceathensaegeaninfo.com Plato academy, at GreeceAthensAegeanInfo.com[unreliable source?] ^ Plutarch, Cimon 13 ^ Schmitz, Leonhard (1867), "Academus", in Smith, William (ed.), Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology, 1, Boston, p. 5 ^ pp. 5–6, D. Nails, "The Life of Plato of Athens", in H. Benson (ed.), A Companion to Plato, Blackwell Publishing 2006. ^ pp. 19–20, W. K. C. Guthrie, A History of Greek Philosophy, vol. 4, Cambridge University Press 1975; p. 1, R. Dancy, "Academy", in D. Zeyl (ed.), Encyclopedia of Classical Philosophy, Greenwood Press 1997. I. Mueller gives a much broader time frame – "...some time between the early 380s and the middle 360s..." – perhaps reflecting our real lack of evidence about the specific date (p. 170, "Mathematical Method & Philosophical Truth", in R. Kraut (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Plato, Cambridge University Press 1992). ^ D. Sedley, "Academy", in the Oxford Classical Dictionary, 3rd ed.; p. 4, J. Barnes, "Life and Work", in The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle, Cambridge University Press 1995; J. Barnes, "Academy", E. Craig (Ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Routledge 1998, accessed 13 Sept 2008, from http://www.rep.routledge.com/article/A001. ^ a b Plato's academy : its workings and its history. Kalligas, Paulos. Cambridge, United Kingdom. p. 76. ISBN 978-1-108-55466-4. OCLC 1120786946.CS1 maint: others (link) ^ p. 31, J. Barnes, Aristotle: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford University Press 2000. ^ p. 170, Mueller, "Mathematical Method & Philosophical Truth"; p. 249, D. Nails, The People of Plato, Hackett 2002. ^ pp. 170–171, Mueller, "Mathematical Method & Philosophical Truth"; p. 248, Nails, The People of Plato. ^ Barnes, "Academy". ^ http://www.hackettpublishing.com/philosophy/women-in-the-academy ^ p. 2, Dancy, "Academy". ^ p. 2, Dancy, "Academy"; p. 21, Guthrie, A History of Greek Philosophy, vol. 4; p. 34–36, Barnes, Aristotle: A Very Short Introduction. ^ p. 67, V. Katz, History of Mathematics ^ p. 22, Guthrie, A History of Greek Philosophy, vol. 4. ^ pp. 170–71, Mueller, "Mathematical Method & Philosophical Truth". ^ M. Schofield, "Plato", in E. Craig (Ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Routledge 1998/2002, retrieved 13 Sept 2008, from http://www.rep.routledge.com/article/A088 ; p. 32, Barnes, Aristotle: A Very Short Introduction. ^ Simplicius, Commentary on Aristotle's "On the Heavens" 488.7–24, quoted on p. 174, Mueller, "Mathematical Method & Philosophical Truth". ^ p. 23, Guthrie, A History of Greek Philosophy, vol. 4; G. Field, "Academy", in the Oxford Classical Dictionary, 2nd ed. ^ p. 293, "Plato & Practical Politics", in Schofield & C. Rowe (eds.), Greek & Roman Political Thought, Cambridge University Press 2000. ^ Charles Anthon, (1855), A Classical Dictionary, page 6 ^ Sextus Empiricus, Outlines of Pyrrhonism, Book 1, Chapter 33, Section 232 ^ Oxford Classical Dictionary, 3rd ed. (1996), s.v. "Philon of Larissa." ^ See the table in The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy (Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp. 53–54. ^ "Academy", E. Craig (Ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Routledge 1998, accessed 14 Sept 2008, from http://www.rep.routledge.com/article/A001. ^ Giovanni Reale, John R. Catan, 1990, A History of Ancient Philosophy: The schools of the Imperial Age, page 207. SUNY Press ^ Plutarch, Sulla 12; cf. Appian, Roman History xii, 5.30 ^ Giovanni Reale, John R. Catan, 1990, A History of Ancient Philosophy: The schools of the Imperial Age, page 208. SUNY Press ^ Cicero, De Finibus, book 5 ^ Alan Cameron, "The last days of the Academy at Athens," in Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society vol 195 (n.s. 15), 1969, pp 7–29. ^ a b c Gerald Bechtle, Bryn Mawr Classical Review of Rainer Thiel, Simplikios und das Ende der neuplatonischen Schule in Athen. Stuttgart, 1999 (in English). ^ The Cambridge Ancient History, (1970), Volume XIV, page 837. Cambridge University Press. ^ a b Richard Sorabji, (2005), The Philosophy of the Commentators, 200–600 AD: Psychology (with Ethics and Religion), page 11. Cornell University Press References[edit] Baltes, M. 1993. "Plato's School, the Academy." Hermathena, (155): 5-26. Brunt, P. A. 1993. "Plato's Academy and Politics." In Studies in Greek History and Thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press, Chapter 10, 282-342. Cherniss, H. 1945. The Riddle of the Early Academy. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. Dancy, R. M. 1991. Two Studies in the Early Academy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. Dillon, J. M. 1979. "The Academy in the Middle Platonic Period." Dionysius, 3: 63-77. Dillon, J. 2003. The Heirs of Plato. A Study of the Old Academy, 347–274 BC. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Dorandi, T. 1999. "Chronology: The Academy." In The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. Edited by Keimpe Algra, Jonathan Barnes, Jaap Mansfeld, and Malcolm Schofield, 31–35. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press. Glucker, J. 1978. Antiochus and the Late Academy. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. Lynch, J. P. 1972. Aristotle's School: A Study of a Greek Educational Institution. Berkeley: University of California Press. Murray, J. S. 2006. "Searching for Plato's Academy, 1929-1940." Mouseion: Journal of the Classical Association of Canada, 6 (2): 219-56 Russell, J. H. 2012. "When Philosophers Rule: The Platonic Academy and Statesmanship." History of Political Thought, 33 (2): 209-230. Wallach, J. R. 2002. "The Platonic Academy and Democracy." Polis (Exeter), 19 (1-2): 7-27 Watts, E. 2007. "Creating the Academy: Historical Discourse and the Shape of Community in the Old Academy". The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 127: 106–122. Wycherley, R. 1961. "Peripatos: The Athenian Philosophical Scene—I". Greece & Rome, 8(2), 152–163. Wycherley, R. 1962. Peripatos: The Athenian Philosophical Scene—II". Greece & Rome, 9(1), 2–21. Zhmud, Leonid. 2006. "Science in the Platonic Academy". In The Origin of the History of Science in Classical Antiquity. pp. 82–116. Berlin: De Gruyter. External links[edit] Wikimedia Commons has media related to Platonic Academy. Wikisource has the text of a 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica article about Platonic Academy. Library resources about Platonic Academy Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries "Academy" . Collier's New Encyclopedia. 1921. The Academy, entry in the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy Directions to the archaeological site of Plato's Academy, other useful information, and some photos v t e School types By educational stage Early childhood Preschool Pre-kindergarten Kindergarten Primary Elementary school First school Infant school Junior school Primary school Secondary Adult high school Cadet college Collegiate institute Comprehensive high school Comprehensive school Continuation high school Grammar school Gymnasium High school Lyceum Secondary school Sixth form college Studio school University-preparatory school University technical college Upper school Tertiary Professional school Technical school Vocational school Higher Academy College Community college Graduate school Institute of technology Junior college Liberal arts college Research university Seminary University Upper division college Vocational university Combined All-through school K–12 school Middle school One-room schools Ranch school By funding / eligibility Academy (England) Charter school Community day school Comprehensive school (British) For-profit education Free education Free school (England) Independent school UK Independent school preparatory public Selective school Separate school Sink school State or public school State-integrated school (New Zealand) By style / method Alternative school Boarding school Catholic school Christian school Day school Democratic education Folk high school Free skool Homeschooling International school Madrasa Magnet school Music school Parochial school Progressive education Free school movement Laboratory school Montessori school Waldorf school Sudbury school Virtual school Vocal school Yeshiva By scope College preparatory Compensatory education Compulsory education Continuing education Further education Gifted education Remedial education Special education Historical Ancient higher-learning institutions Platonic Academy Lyceum Monastic schools Cathedral schools Medieval universities Schools imposed on indigenous peoples in Canada in New Zealand in the United States in South Africa Informal or illegal in Ireland in Greece in South Tyrol Related topics Educational institution  Schools portal Category Commons v t e Ancient Greek and Hellenistic mathematics (Euclidean geometry) Mathematicians (timeline) Anaxagoras Anthemius Archytas Aristaeus the Elder Aristarchus Apollonius Archimedes Autolycus Bion Bryson Callippus Carpus Chrysippus Cleomedes Conon Ctesibius Democritus Dicaearchus Diocles Diophantus Dinostratus Dionysodorus Domninus Eratosthenes Eudemus Euclid Eudoxus Eutocius Geminus Heron Hipparchus Hippasus Hippias Hippocrates Hypatia Hypsicles Isidore of Miletus Leon Marinus Menaechmus Menelaus Metrodorus Nicomachus Nicomedes Nicoteles Oenopides Pappus Perseus Philolaus Philon Philonides Porphyry Posidonius Proclus Ptolemy Pythagoras Serenus Simplicius Sosigenes Sporus Thales Theaetetus Theano Theodorus Theodosius Theon of Alexandria Theon of Smyrna Thymaridas Xenocrates Zeno of Elea Zeno of Sidon Zenodorus Treatises Almagest Archimedes Palimpsest Arithmetica Conics (Apollonius) Catoptrics Data (Euclid) Elements (Euclid) Measurement of a Circle On Conoids and Spheroids On the Sizes and Distances (Aristarchus) On Sizes and Distances (Hipparchus) On the Moving Sphere (Autolycus) Euclid's Optics On Spirals On the Sphere and Cylinder Ostomachion Planisphaerium Sphaerics The Quadrature of the Parabola The Sand Reckoner Problems Angle trisection Doubling the cube Squaring the circle Problem of Apollonius Concepts/definitions Circles of Apollonius Apollonian circles Apollonian gasket Circumscribed circle Commensurability Diophantine equation Doctrine of proportionality Golden ratio Greek numerals Incircle and excircles of a triangle Method of exhaustion Parallel postulate Platonic solid Lune of Hippocrates Quadratrix of Hippias Regular polygon Straightedge and compass construction Triangle center Results In Elements Angle bisector theorem Exterior angle theorem Euclidean algorithm Euclid's theorem Geometric mean theorem Greek geometric algebra Hinge theorem Inscribed angle theorem Intercept theorem Pons asinorum Pythagorean theorem Thales's theorem Theorem of the gnomon Apollonius Apollonius's theorem Other Aristarchus's inequality Crossbar theorem Heron's formula Irrational numbers Menelaus's theorem Pappus's area theorem Ptolemy's inequality Ptolemy's table of chords Ptolemy's theorem Spiral of Theodorus Centers Cyrene Library of Alexandria Platonic Academy Other Ancient Greek astronomy Greek numerals Latin translations of the 12th century Neusis construction v t e Plato General Early life Concepts Platonism Platonic epistemology Platonic idealism Platonic realism Innatism Platonic love Cardinal virtues Demiurge Theory of Forms Transcendentals Form of the Good Third man argument Euthyphro dilemma Five regimes Theory of soul Philosopher king Platonic solid True name Agathos kai sophos Khôra Metaxy Peritrope Philotimon Poiesis Psychagogy Sophrosyne Theia mania Topos hyperuranios Legacy Unwritten doctrines Cultural influence of Plato's Republic Neoplatonism and Gnosticism Platonism in the Renaissance Works Uncontested Apology Charmides Cratylus Critias Crito Euthydemus Euthyphro Gorgias Hippias Minor Ion Laches Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 228 Laws Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 23 Lysis Menexenus Meno Parmenides Phaedo Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 229 Phaedrus Philebus Protagoras Republic Sophist Statesman Symposium Theaetetus Timaeus Of doubtful authenticity Axiochus Clitophon Definitions Demodocus Epigrams Epinomis Epistles Letter I II IV V VI VII IX X XI XII Eryxias First Alcibiades Halcyon Hipparchus Hippias Major Minos On Justice On Virtue Rival Lovers Second Alcibiades Sisyphus Theages Allegories and metaphors Atlantis Ring of Gyges The Cave The Divided Line The Sun Ship of State Myth of Er The Chariot Allegorical interpretations of Plato Family Ariston of Athens (father) Pyrilampes (stepfather) Perictione (mother) Adeimantus of Collytus (brother) Glaucon (brother) Antiphon (brother) Potone (sister) Speusippus (nephew) Related Commentaries The Academy in Athens Socratic problem Middle Platonism Neoplatonism and Christianity Poitier Meets Plato List of speakers in Plato's dialogues "Plato's Dream" v t e Major landmarks of Athens Ancient Acropolis Ancient Agora Arch of Hadrian Areopagus Aristotle’s Lyceum Hadrian's Library Kerameikos Monument of Lysicrates Odeon of Herodes Atticus Panathenaic Stadium Philopappos Hill/Monument Platonic Academy Pnyx Remains of the Acharnian Road, Acharnian Gate and Cemetery Site Remains of the Long Walls Roman Agora Stoa of Attalos Temple of Hephaestus Temple of Olympian Zeus Theatre of Dionysus Tower of the Winds Byzantine Little Metropolis Daphni Monastery Holy Apostles Church Kapnikarea Church Pantanassa Church Holy Trinity Church Ottoman Fethiye Mosque House of Saint Philothei/Benizelos-Palaiologos mansion Tzistarakis Mosque Modern Hansen's "Trilogy" Academy Kapodistrian University of Athens National Library of Greece Museums Acropolis Museum Benaki Museum Byzantine and Christian Museum Museum of Cycladic Art Kerameikos Museum National Archaeological Museum National Gallery National Historical Museum Numismatic Museum Churches Metropolitan Cathedral of Athens Cathedral Basilica of St. Dionysius the Areopagite Gardens/Parks Lycabettus Hill National Gardens Pedion tou Areos Squares and Neighbourhoods Anafiotika Kolonaki Square Kotzia Square Monastiraki Omonoia Square Plaka Syntagma Thiseio Tomb of the Unknown Soldier Athens Concert Hall Athens Towers Gennadius Library National Observatory of Athens National Theatre Old Parliament House Old Royal Palace Olympic Sports Complex Presidential Mansion Stavros Niarchos Foundation Cultural Center Zappeion Marinas Agios Kosmas Marina Alimos Marina Athens Marina (formerly Faliro Marina) Glyfada Marina Olympic Marine Marina of Vouliagmeni Marina of Zea Others Dionysiou Areopagitou Street Ermou Street First Cemetery of Athens Authority control GND: 1035537052 NLG: 104972 VIAF: 301913189 WorldCat Identities: viaf-301913189 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Platonic_Academy&oldid=996123483" Categories: 380s BC establishments Ancient Athens Archaeological sites in Attica Educational institutions established in the 4th century BC Education in classical antiquity Hellenistic civilization Landmarks in Athens Neoplatonism Plato Ancient Greek archaeological sites in Greece Gymnasiums (ancient Greece) Academic skepticism Hidden categories: All articles lacking reliable references Articles lacking reliable references from November 2007 CS1 maint: others Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata Coordinates on Wikidata Wikipedia articles needing clarification from October 2014 Commons category link is on Wikidata Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from Collier's Encyclopedia Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLG identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Languages አማርኛ العربية Azərbaycanca বাংলা Български Brezhoneg Català Cebuano Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français Galego 한국어 Հայերեն Bahasa Indonesia Interlingua Íslenska Italiano עברית ქართული Қазақша Latina Latviešu Lietuvių Lingua Franca Nova Magyar മലയാളം Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål پنجابی Papiamentu Polski Português Română Русский Shqip سنڌي Slovenčina Slovenščina کوردی Српски / srpski Suomi Svenska தமிழ் Тоҷикӣ Türkçe Українська اردو Tiếng Việt 吴语 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 24 December 2020, at 17:39 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-116 ---- Libertas - Wikipedia Libertas From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search This article is about the Roman goddess. For other uses, see Libertas (disambiguation). Libertas Goddess of liberty Libertas with her attributes Symbol Pileus, rod (vindicta or festuca) Greek equivalent Eleutheria Denarius (42 BC) issued by Cassius Longinus and Lentulus Spinther, depicting the crowned head of Libertas, with a sacrificial jug and lituus on the reverse Libertas (Latin for 'liberty' or 'freedom', pronounced [liːˈbɛrt̪aːs̠]) is the Roman goddess and personification of liberty. She became a politicised figure in the Late Republic, featured on coins supporting the populares faction, and later those of the assassins of Julius Caesar. Nonetheless, she sometimes appears on coins from the imperial period, such as Galba's "Freedom of the People" coins during his short reign after the death of Nero.[1] She is usually portrayed with two accoutrements: the rod and the soft pileus, which she holds out, rather than wears. The Greek equivalent of the goddess Libertas is Eleutheria, the personification of liberty. There are many post-classical depictions of liberty as a person which often retain some of the iconography of the Roman goddess. Contents 1 Etymology 2 Attributes 3 Temples 4 Post-classical 5 See also 6 References 6.1 Bibliography 7 External links Etymology[edit] The name Lībertās ('freedom') is a derivation from Latin Līber ('free'), stemming from Proto-Italic *leuþero, and ultimately from Proto-Indo-European *h₁leudʰero ('belonging to the people', hence 'free').[2] Attributes[edit] Libertas was associated with the pileus, commonly worn by the freed slave:[3] Among the Romans the cap of felt was the emblem of liberty. When a slave obtained his freedom he had his head shaved, and wore instead of his hair an undyed pileus (πίλεον λευκόν, Diodorus Siculus Exc. Leg. 22 p625, ed. Wess.; Plaut. Amphit. I.1.306; Persius, V.82). Hence the phrase servos ad pileum vocare is a summons to liberty, by which slaves were frequently called upon to take up arms with a promise of liberty (Liv. XXIV.32). "The figure of Liberty on some of the coins of Antoninus Pius, struck A.D. 145, holds this cap in the right hand".[4] Libertas was also recognized in ancient Rome by the rod (vindicta or festuca),[3] used ceremonially in the act of Manumissio vindicta, Latin for 'freedom by the rod' (emphasis added): The master brought his slave before the magistratus, and stated the grounds (causa) of the intended manumission. "The lictor of the magistratus laid a rod (festuca) on the head of the slave, accompanied with certain formal words, in which he declared that he was a free man ex Jure Quiritium", that is, "vindicavit in libertatem". The master in the meantime held the slave, and after he had pronounced the words "hunc hominem liberum volo," he turned him round (momento turbinis exit Marcus Dama, Persius, Sat. V.78) and let him go (emisit e manu, or misit manu, Plaut. Capt. II.3.48), whence the general name of the act of manumission. The magistratus then declared him to be free [...][5] Temples[edit] The Roman Republic was established simultaneously with the creation of Libertas and is associated with the overthrow of the Tarquin kings. She was worshiped by the Junii, the family of Marcus Junius Brutus.[6] In 238 BC, before the Second Punic War, Tiberius Sempronius Gracchus built a temple to Libertas on the Aventine Hill.[7] Census tables were stored inside the temple's atrium. A subsequent temple was built (58–57 BC) on Palatine Hill, another of the Seven hills of Rome, by Publius Clodius Pulcher. By building and consecrating the temple on the site of the former house of then-exiled Cicero, Clodius ensured that the land was legally uninhabitable. Upon his return, Cicero successfully argued that the consecration was invalid and thus managed to reclaim the land and destroy the temple. In 46 BC, the Roman Senate voted to build and dedicate a shrine to Libertas in recognition of Julius Caesar, but no temple was built; instead, a small statue of the goddess stood in the Roman Forum.[8] Post-classical[edit] The Statue of Liberty (Liberty Enlightening the World) in New York derives from the ancient goddess Libertas. The goddess Libertas is also depicted on the Great Seal of France, created in 1848. This is the image which later influenced French sculptor Frederic-Auguste Bartholdi in the creation of his statue of Liberty Enlightening the World. Libertas, along with other Roman goddesses, has served as the inspiration for many modern-day personifications, including the Statue of Liberty on Liberty Island in the United States. According to the National Park Service, the Statue's Roman robe is the main feature that invokes Libertas and the symbol of Liberty from which the statue derives its name.[9] In addition, money throughout history has borne the name or image of Libertas. As "Liberty", Libertas was depicted on the obverse (heads side) of most coinage in the U.S. into the twentieth century – and the image is still used for the American Gold Eagle gold bullion coin. The University of North Carolina records two instances of private banks in its state depicting Libertas on their banknotes;[10][11] Libertas is depicted on the 5, 10 and 20 Rappen denomination coins of Switzerland. The symbolic characters Columbia who represents the United States and Marianne, who represents France, the Statue of Liberty (Liberty Enlightening the World) in New York Harbor, and many other characters and concepts of the modern age were created, and are seen, as embodiments of Libertas. See also[edit] Liber Libera (mythology) a goddess in Roman mythology Liberty Leading the People, 1830 painting References[edit] ^ "Roman Coins" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-10-31. Retrieved 2008-09-01. ^ de Vaan 2008, p. 338. ^ a b Tate, Karen; Olson, Brad (2005). Sacred Places of Goddess: 108 Destinations. CCC Publishing. pp. 360–361. ISBN 1-888729-11-2. ^ Yates, James. Entry "Pileus" in William Smith's A Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities (John Murray, London, 1875). ^ Long, George. Entry "Manumission" in William Smith's A Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities (John Murray, London, 1875). ^ The American Catholic Quarterly Review ... Hardy and Mahony. 1880. p. 589. ^ Karl Galinsky; Kenneth Lapatin (1 January 2016). Cultural Memories in the Roman Empire. Getty Publications. p. 230. ISBN 978-1-60606-462-7. ^ "Libertas". Encyclopædia Britannica. 2008. Retrieved 1 September 2008. ^ "Robe". National Park Service. Retrieved 2008-09-01. ^ Howgego, C. J. (1995). Ancient history from coins. Psychology Press. ISBN 978-0-415-08993-7. Retrieved 4 December 2011. ^ "Bank of Fayetteville one-dollar note, 1855". Archived from the original on 2012-05-24. Retrieved 2008-09-01. Bibliography[edit] de Vaan, Michiel (2008). Etymological Dictionary of Latin and the other Italic Languages. Brill. ISBN 9789004167971. External links[edit] Wikimedia Commons has media related to Libertas. David Hackett Fischer, Liberty and Freedom (2005) The many faces of Miss Liberty v t e Liberty Concepts Cognitive liberty Moral responsibility Personification of Liberty Libertas Negative liberty Positive liberty Rights Self-ownership Social liberty Free will By type Academic Civil Economic Intellectual Morphological Political By right Assembly Association Choice Education Gun Information Life Movement Press Property Religion Public speech Thought v t e Ancient Roman religion and mythology Deities (Dii Consentes) Agenoria Angerona Anna Perenna Apollo Bellona Bona Dea Carmenta Castor and Pollux Ceres Cloacina Cupid Dea Dia Diana Dies Dīs Pater Egeria Fauna Faunus Flora Genius Hercules Janus Juno Jupiter Lares Liber Libertas Mars Mercury Minerva Neptune Orcus Penates Pluto Pomona Priapus Proserpina Quirinus Saturn Silvanus Sol Venus Veritas Vesta Vulcan Abstract deities Abundantia Aequitas Aeternitas Africa Annona Averruncus Concordia Feronia Fides Fortuna Fontus Laverna Pietas Roma Salus Securitas Spes Tranquillitas Victoria Terra Legendary figures Aeneas Rhea Silvia Romulus and Remus Numa Pompilius Tullus Hostilius Servius Tullius Ancus Marcius Lucius Tarquinius Priscus Lucius Tarquinius Superbus Texts Virgil Aeneid Ovid Metamorphoses Fasti Propertius Apuleius The Golden Ass Varro Concepts and practices Religion in ancient Rome Festivals Interpretatio graeca Imperial cult Pomerium Temples Philosophy Cynicism Epicureanism Neoplatonism Peripateticism Pythagoreanism Stoicism See also Glossary Greek mythology Myth and ritual Roman polytheism (List) Classical mythology Conversion to Christianity Decline of Greco-Roman polytheism v t e Statue of Liberty Liberty Enlightening the World Creators Édouard René de Laboulaye, originator Frédéric Auguste Bartholdi, sculptor Gustave Eiffel (builder, Eiffel company) Richard Morris Hunt, pedestal Eugène Secrétan, donated copper Engineers Eugène Viollet-le-Duc Maurice Koechlin Joachim Giæver Location Statue of Liberty National Monument Liberty Island Original torch: Statue of Liberty Museum Original statue: Musée des Arts et Métiers Former locations Right arm and torch: Centennial Exposition, 1876 Madison Square Park, 1876-1882 Head: Paris World's Fair, 1878 Replicas Île aux Cygnes Flame of Liberty Leicester Strengthen the Arm of Liberty Austin, Texas Fayetteville, Arkansas Oklahoma City Overview Park, Kansas Pine Bluff, Arkansas Seattle Legacy In popular culture "The New Colossus" (1883 sonnet) Working on the Statue of Liberty (1946 painting) Miss Liberty (1949 musical) The Statue of Liberty (1985 documentary) Liberty: Mother of Exiles (2019 documentary) Statue of Liberty play (American football) Liberty Weekend, 1986 Liberty Fanfare Medal of Liberty Liberty Issue (1954-1965 stamps) Statue of Liberty Forever stamp American Platinum Eagle coin Presidential dollar coins American Innovation dollars Related Conservation-restoration of the Statue of Liberty Statue of Liberty Museum Egypt Carrying the Light to Asia Libertas Personification of Liberty Ellis Island Black Tom explosion Musée Bartholdi Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Libertas&oldid=994847214" Categories: Roman goddesses Roman mythology Personifications in Roman mythology Liberty symbols Hidden categories: Articles having different image on Wikidata and Wikipedia Commons category link is on Wikidata Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Languages Afrikaans Català Dansk Deutsch Español Esperanto فارسی Français Italiano עברית Magyar Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Norsk nynorsk Polski Português Русский Suomi Svenska Türkçe Українська Tiếng Việt 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 17 December 2020, at 21:03 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1179 ---- Robert Frost - Wikipedia Robert Frost From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search American poet This article is about the poet. For other people with the same name, see Robert Frost (disambiguation). Robert Frost Robert Frost in 1941 Born Robert Lee Frost (1874-03-26)March 26, 1874 San Francisco, California, US Died January 29, 1963(1963-01-29) (aged 88) Boston, Massachusetts, US Occupation Poet, playwright Alma mater Dartmouth College (no degree) Harvard University (no degree) Notable works A Boy's Will, North of Boston[1] Notable awards Pulitzer Prize for Poetry, Congressional Gold Medal Spouse Elinor Miriam White ​ ​ (m. 1895; died 1938)​ Children 6 Signature Robert Lee Frost (March 26, 1874 – January 29, 1963) was an American poet. His work was initially published in England before it was published in the United States. Known for his realistic depictions of rural life and his command of American colloquial speech,[2] Frost frequently wrote about settings from rural life in New England in the early 20th century, using them to examine complex social and philosophical themes. Frost was honored frequently during his lifetime and is the only poet to receive four Pulitzer Prizes for Poetry. He became one of America's rare "public literary figures, almost an artistic institution."[3] He was awarded the Congressional Gold Medal in 1960 for his poetic works. On July 22, 1961, Frost was named poet laureate of Vermont. Contents 1 Biography 1.1 Early years 1.2 Adult years 1.3 Personal life 2 Work 2.1 Style and critical response 2.2 Themes 2.3 Influenced by 2.4 Influenced 3 Awards and recognition 3.1 Pulitzer Prizes 4 Legacy and cultural influence 5 Selected works 5.1 Poetry collections 5.2 Plays 5.3 Letters 5.4 Other 6 See also 7 Citations 8 General sources 9 External links Biography Early years Robert Frost, circa 1910 Robert Frost was born in San Francisco, California, to journalist William Prescott Frost, Jr., and Isabelle Moodie.[2] His mother was a Scottish immigrant, and his father descended from Nicholas Frost of Tiverton, Devon, England, who had sailed to New Hampshire in 1634 on the Wolfrana. Frost was a descendant of Samuel Appleton, one of the early settlers of Ipswich, Massachusetts, and Rev. George Phillips, one of the early settlers of Watertown, Massachusetts.[4] Frost's father was a teacher and later an editor of the San Francisco Evening Bulletin (which later merged with The San Francisco Examiner), and an unsuccessful candidate for city tax collector. After his death on May 5, 1885, the family moved across the country to Lawrence, Massachusetts, under the patronage of Robert's grandfather William Frost, Sr., who was an overseer at a New England mill. Frost graduated from Lawrence High School in 1892.[5] Frost's mother joined the Swedenborgian church and had him baptized in it, but he left it as an adult. Although known for his later association with rural life, Frost grew up in the city, and he published his first poem in his high school's magazine. He attended Dartmouth College for two months, long enough to be accepted into the Theta Delta Chi fraternity. Frost returned home to teach and to work at various jobs, including helping his mother teach her class of unruly boys, delivering newspapers, and working in a factory maintaining carbon arc lamps. He did not enjoy these jobs, feeling his true calling was poetry. Adult years Robert Frost's 85th birthday in 1959 In 1894, he sold his first poem, "My Butterfly. An Elegy" (published in the November 8, 1894, edition of the New York Independent) for $15 ($443 today). Proud of his accomplishment, he proposed marriage to Elinor Miriam White, but she demurred, wanting to finish college (at St. Lawrence University) before they married. Frost then went on an excursion to the Great Dismal Swamp in Virginia and asked Elinor again upon his return. Having graduated, she agreed, and they were married at Lawrence, Massachusetts on December 19, 1895. Frost attended Harvard University from 1897 to 1899, but he left voluntarily due to illness.[6][7][8] Shortly before his death, Frost's grandfather purchased a farm for Robert and Elinor in Derry, New Hampshire; Frost worked the farm for nine years while writing early in the mornings and producing many of the poems that would later become famous. Ultimately his farming proved unsuccessful and he returned to the field of education as an English teacher at New Hampshire's Pinkerton Academy from 1906 to 1911, then at the New Hampshire Normal School (now Plymouth State University) in Plymouth, New Hampshire. In 1912, Frost sailed with his family to Great Britain, settling first in Beaconsfield, a small town outside London. His first book of poetry, A Boy's Will, was published the next year. In England he made some important acquaintances, including Edward Thomas (a member of the group known as the Dymock poets and Frost's inspiration for "The Road Not Taken"[9]), T. E. Hulme, and Ezra Pound. Although Pound would become the first American to write a favorable review of Frost's work, Frost later resented Pound's attempts to manipulate his American prosody.[10] Frost met or befriended many contemporary poets in England, especially after his first two poetry volumes were published in London in 1913 (A Boy's Will) and 1914 (North of Boston). The Robert Frost Farm in Derry, New Hampshire, where he wrote many of his poems, including "Tree at My Window" and "Mending Wall." In 1915, during World War I, Frost returned to America, where Holt's American edition of A Boy's Will had recently been published, and bought a farm in Franconia, New Hampshire, where he launched a career of writing, teaching, and lecturing. This family homestead served as the Frosts' summer home until 1938. It is maintained today as The Frost Place, a museum and poetry conference site. He was made an honorary member of Phi Beta Kappa at Harvard[11] in 1916. During the years 1917–20, 1923–25, and, on a more informal basis, 1926–1938, Frost taught English at Amherst College in Massachusetts, notably encouraging his students to account for the myriad sounds and intonations of the spoken English language in their writing. He called his colloquial approach to language "the sound of sense."[12] In 1924, he won the first of four Pulitzer Prizes for the book New Hampshire: A Poem with Notes and Grace Notes.[13] He would win additional Pulitzers for Collected Poems in 1931,[14] A Further Range in 1937,[15] and A Witness Tree in 1943.[16] For forty-two years – from 1921 to 1962 – Frost spent almost every summer and fall teaching at the Bread Loaf School of English of Middlebury College, at its mountain campus at Ripton, Vermont. He is credited as a major influence upon the development of the school and its writing programs. The college now owns and maintains his former Ripton farmstead, a National Historic Landmark, near the Bread Loaf campus.[17] In 1921, Frost accepted a fellowship teaching post at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, where he resided until 1927 when he returned to teach at Amherst. While teaching at the University of Michigan, he was awarded a lifetime appointment at the University as a Fellow in Letters.[18] The Robert Frost Ann Arbor home was purchased by The Henry Ford Museum in Dearborn, Michigan and relocated to the museum's Greenfield Village site for public tours. Throughout the 1920s, Frost also lived in his colonial era home in Shaftsbury, Vermont. The home opened as the Robert Frost Stone House Museum[19] in 2002 and was given to Bennington College in 2017.[19] In 1934, Frost began to spend winter months in Florida.[20] In March 1935, he gave a talk at the University of Miami.[20] In 1940, he bought a 5-acre (2.0 ha) plot in South Miami, Florida, naming it Pencil Pines; he spent his winters there for the rest of his life.[20] In her memoir about Frost's time in Florida, Helen Muir writes, "Frost had called his five acres Pencil Pines because he said he had never made a penny from anything that did not involve the use of a pencil."[20] His properties also included a house on Brewster Street in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Harvard's 1965 alumni directory indicates Frost received an honorary degree there. Although he never graduated from college, Frost received over 40 honorary degrees, including ones from Princeton, Oxford and Cambridge universities, and was the only person to receive two honorary degrees from Dartmouth College. During his lifetime, the Robert Frost Middle School in Fairfax, Virginia, the Robert L. Frost School in Lawrence, Massachusetts, and the main library of Amherst College were named after him. "I had a lover's quarrel with the world." The epitaph engraved on his tomb is an excerpt from his poem "The Lesson for Today." In 1960, Frost was awarded a United States Congressional Gold Medal, "In recognition of his poetry, which has enriched the culture of the United States and the philosophy of the world,"[21] which was finally bestowed by President Kennedy in March 1962.[22] Also in 1962, he was awarded the Edward MacDowell Medal for outstanding contribution to the arts by the MacDowell Colony.[23] Frost was 86 when he read at the inauguration of John F. Kennedy on January 20, 1961. Frost originally attempted to read his poem "Dedication", which was written for the occasion, but was unable to read it due to the brightness of the sunlight, so he recited his poem "The Gift Outright" from memory instead.[24] In the summer of 1962, Frost accompanied Interior Secretary Stewart Udall on a visit to the Soviet Union in hopes of meeting Nikita Khrushchev to lobby for peaceful relations between the two Cold War powers.[25][26][27][28] Frost died in Boston on January 29, 1963 of complications from prostate surgery. He was buried at the Old Bennington Cemetery in Bennington, Vermont. His epitaph quotes the last line from his poem, "The Lesson for Today" (1942): "I had a lover's quarrel with the world." One of the original collections of Frost materials, to which he himself contributed, is found in the Special Collections department of the Jones Library in Amherst, Massachusetts. The collection consists of approximately twelve thousand items, including original manuscript poems and letters, correspondence and photographs, as well as audio and visual recordings.[29] The Archives and Special Collections at Amherst College holds a small collection of his papers. The University of Michigan Library holds the Robert Frost Family Collection of manuscripts, photographs, printed items, and artwork. The most significant collection of Frost's working manuscripts is held by Dartmouth. Personal life The Frost family grave in Bennington Old Cemetery Robert Frost's personal life was plagued by grief and loss. In 1885 when he was 11, his father died of tuberculosis, leaving the family with just eight dollars. Frost's mother died of cancer in 1900. In 1920, he had to commit his younger sister Jeanie to a mental hospital, where she died nine years later. Mental illness apparently ran in Frost's family, as both he and his mother suffered from depression, and his daughter Irma was committed to a mental hospital in 1947. Frost's wife, Elinor, also experienced bouts of depression.[18] Elinor and Robert Frost had six children: son Elliot (1896–1900, died of cholera); daughter Lesley Frost Ballantine (1899–1983); son Carol (1902–1940, committed suicide); daughter Irma (1903–1967); daughter Marjorie (1905–1934, died as a result of puerperal fever after childbirth); and daughter Elinor Bettina (died just one day after her birth in 1907). Only Lesley and Irma outlived their father. Frost's wife, who had heart problems throughout her life, developed breast cancer in 1937, and died of heart failure in 1938.[18] Work Style and critical response The poet and critic Randall Jarrell often praised Frost's poetry and wrote "Robert Frost, along with Stevens and Eliot, seems to me the greatest of the American poets of this century. Frost's virtues are extraordinary. No other living poet has written so well about the actions of ordinary men; his wonderful dramatic monologues or dramatic scenes come out of a knowledge of people that few poets have had, and they are written in a verse that uses, sometimes with absolute mastery, the rhythms of actual speech". He also praised "Frost's seriousness and honesty", stating that Frost was particularly skilled at representing a wide range of human experience in his poems.[30] Jarrell's notable and influential essays on Frost include the essays "Robert Frost's 'Home Burial'" (1962), which consisted of an extended close reading of that particular poem,[31] and "To The Laodiceans" (1952) in which Jarrell defended Frost against critics who had accused Frost of being too "traditional" and out of touch with Modern or Modernist poetry. U.S stamp, 1974 In Frost's defense, Jarrell wrote "the regular ways of looking at Frost's poetry are grotesque simplifications, distortions, falsifications—coming to know his poetry well ought to be enough, in itself, to dispel any of them, and to make plain the necessity of finding some other way of talking about his work." And Jarrell's close readings of poems like "Neither Out Too Far Nor In Too Deep" led readers and critics to perceive more of the complexities in Frost's poetry.[32][33] In an introduction to Jarrell's book of essays, Brad Leithauser notes that "the 'other' Frost that Jarrell discerned behind the genial, homespun New England rustic—the 'dark' Frost who was desperate, frightened, and brave—has become the Frost we've all learned to recognize, and the little-known poems Jarrell singled out as central to the Frost canon are now to be found in most anthologies".[34][35] Jarrell lists a selection of the Frost poems he considers the most masterful, including "The Witch of Coös", "Home Burial", "A Servant to Servants", "Directive", "Neither Out Too Far Nor In Too Deep", "Provide, Provide", "Acquainted with the Night", "After Apple Picking", "Mending Wall", "The Most of It", "An Old Man's Winter Night", "To Earthward", "Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening", "Spring Pools", "The Lovely Shall Be Choosers", "Design", and "Desert Places".[36] From "Birches"[37] I'd like to get away from earth awhile And then come back to it and begin over. May no fate willfully misunderstand me And half grant what I wish and snatch me away Not to return. Earth's the right place for love: I don't know where it's likely to go better. I'd like to go by climbing a birch tree, And climb black branches up a snow-white trunk Toward heaven, till the tree could bear no more, But dipped its top and set me down again. That would be good both going and coming back. One could do worse than be a swinger of birches. Robert Frost In 2003, the critic Charles McGrath noted that critical views on Frost's poetry have changed over the years (as has his public image). In an article called "The Vicissitudes of Literary Reputation," McGrath wrote, "Robert Frost ... at the time of his death in 1963 was generally considered to be a New England folkie ... In 1977, the third volume of Lawrance Thompson's biography suggested that Frost was a much nastier piece of work than anyone had imagined; a few years later, thanks to the reappraisal of critics like William H. Pritchard and Harold Bloom and of younger poets like Joseph Brodsky, he bounced back again, this time as a bleak and unforgiving modernist."[38] In The Norton Anthology of Modern Poetry, editors Richard Ellmann and Robert O'Clair compared and contrasted Frost's unique style to the work of the poet Edwin Arlington Robinson since they both frequently used New England settings for their poems. However, they state that Frost's poetry was "less [consciously] literary" and that this was possibly due to the influence of English and Irish writers like Thomas Hardy and W.B. Yeats. They note that Frost's poems "show a successful striving for utter colloquialism" and always try to remain down to earth, while at the same time using traditional forms despite the trend of American poetry towards free verse which Frost famously said was "'like playing tennis without a net.'"[39][40] In providing an overview of Frost's style, the Poetry Foundation makes the same point, placing Frost's work "at the crossroads of nineteenth-century American poetry [with regard to his use of traditional forms] and modernism [with his use of idiomatic language and ordinary, every day subject matter]." They also note that Frost believed that "the self-imposed restrictions of meter in form" was more helpful than harmful because he could focus on the content of his poems instead of concerning himself with creating "innovative" new verse forms.[41] An earlier 1963 study by the poet James Radcliffe Squires spoke to the distinction of Frost as a poet whose verse soars more for the difficulty and skill by which he attains his final visions, than for the philosophical purity of the visions themselves. "He has written at a time when the choice for the poet seemed to lie among the forms of despair: Science, solipsism, or the religion of the past century ... Frost has refused all of these and in the refusal has long seemed less dramatically committed than others ... But no, he must be seen as dramatically uncommitted to the single solution ... Insofar as Frost allows to both fact and intuition a bright kingdom, he speaks for many of us. Insofar as he speaks through an amalgam of senses and sure experience so that his poetry seems a nostalgic memory with overtones touching some conceivable future, he speaks better than most of us. That is to say, as a poet must."[42] The classicist Helen H. Bacon has proposed that Frost's deep knowledge of Greek and Roman classics influenced much of his work. Frost's education at Lawrence High School, Dartmouth, and Harvard "was based mainly on the classics". As examples, she links imagery and action in Frost's early poems "Birches" (1915) and "Wild Grapes" (1920) with Euripides' Bacchae. She cites the certain motifs, including that of the tree bent down to earth, as evidence of his "very attentive reading of Bacchae, almost certainly in Greek". In a later poem, "One More Brevity" (1953), Bacon compares the poetic techniques used by Frost to those of Virgil in the Aeneid. She notes that "this sampling of the ways Frost drew on the literature and concepts of the Greek and Roman world at every stage of his life indicates how imbued with it he was".[43] Themes In Contemporary Literary Criticism, the editors state that "Frost's best work explores fundamental questions of existence, depicting with chilling starkness the loneliness of the individual in an indifferent universe."[44] The critic T. K. Whipple focused on this bleakness in Frost's work, stating that "in much of his work, particularly in North of Boston, his harshest book, he emphasizes the dark background of life in rural New England, with its degeneration often sinking into total madness."[44] In sharp contrast, the founding publisher and editor of Poetry, Harriet Monroe, emphasized the folksy New England persona and characters in Frost's work, writing that "perhaps no other poet in our history has put the best of the Yankee spirit into a book so completely."[44] She notes his frequent use of rural settings and farm life, and she likes that in these poems, Frost is most interested in "showing the human reaction to nature's processes." She also notes that while Frost's narrative, character-based poems are often satirical, Frost always has a "sympathetic humor" towards his subjects.[44] Influenced by Robert Graves Rupert Brooke Thomas Hardy[39] William Butler Yeats[39] John Keats Influenced Robert Francis Seamus Heaney[12] Richard Wilbur[12] Edward Thomas[45] James Wright Awards and recognition Frost was nominated for the Nobel Prize in Literature 31 times.[46] In June 1922, the Vermont State League of Women's Clubs elected Frost as Poet laureate of Vermont. When a New York Times editorial strongly criticised the decision of the Women's Clubs, Sarah Cleghorn and other women wrote to the newspaper defending Frost.[47] On July 22, 1961, Frost was named Poet laureate of Vermont by the state legislature through Joint Resolution R-59 of the Acts of 1961, which also created the position.[48][49][50][51] Pulitzer Prizes 1924 for New Hampshire: A Poem With Notes and Grace Notes 1931 for Collected Poems 1937 for A Further Range 1943 for A Witness Tree Legacy and cultural influence Robert Frost Hall at Southern New Hampshire University Robert Frost Hall is an academic building at Southern New Hampshire University in Manchester, New Hampshire.[52] In the early morning of November 23, 1963, Westinghouse Broadcasting's Sid Davis reported the arrival of President John F. Kennedy's casket at the White House. Since Frost was one of the President's favorite poets, Davis concluded his report with a passage from "Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening", but was overcome with emotion as he signed off.[53][54] Jawaharlal Nehru (1889–1964), the first Prime Minister of India, had kept a book of Robert Frost's close to him towards his later years, even at his bedside table as he lay dying.[55] The poem "Nothing Gold Can Stay" is featured in both the 1967 novel The Outsiders by S. E. Hinton and the 1983 film adaptation, first recited aloud by the character Ponyboy to his friend Johnny. In a subsequent scene Johnny quotes a stanza from the poem back to Ponyboy by means of a letter which was read after he passes away. His poem "Fire and Ice" influenced the title and other aspects of George R. R. Martin's fantasy series A Song of Ice and Fire.[56][57] Nothing Gold Can Stay is the name of the debut studio album by American pop-punk band New Found Glory, released on October 19, 1999.[58] At the funeral of former Canadian prime minister Pierre Trudeau, on October 3, 2000, his eldest son Justin rephrased the last stanza of the poem "Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening" in his eulogy: "The woods are lovely, dark and deep. He has kept his promises and earned his sleep."[59] A Garfield comic strip published in October 20, 2002 originally featured the titular character reciting "Nothing Gold Can Stay".[60] However, this was replaced in book collections and online edition,[61] likely due to the poem being still under copyright when the comic ran (the poem has since lapsed into public domain, in 2019).[62] The poem "Fire and Ice" is the epigraph of Stephenie Meyers' book, Eclipse, of the Twilight Saga. It is also read by Kristen Stewart's character, Bella Swan, at the beginning of the Eclipse film. "Nothing Gold Can Stay" is referenced in First Aid Kit's 2014 album Stay Gold: "But just as the moon it shall stray / So dawn goes down today / No gold can stay / No gold can stay."[63] "Nothing Gold Can Stay" (February 4, 2015) is the title given to the tenth episode of the seventh season of The Mentalist in which a character is killed. The character of Baron Quinn recites "Fire and Ice" in an episode of AMC's Into the Badlands. Verses of "Fire and Ice" are referenced and recited throughout the episodic video game Life Is Strange: Before the Storm. The line "Nothing gold can stay" is featured in the 2018 single "Venice Bitch" by American singer Lana Del Rey.[64] Del Rey also previously used this line in her 2015 single "Music to Watch Boys To".[65] Selected works "The Road Not Taken", as featured in Mountain Interval (1916) Poetry collections 1913. A Boy's Will. London: David Nutt (New York: Holt, 1915)[66] 1914. North of Boston. London: David Nutt (New York: Holt, 1914) "After Apple-Picking" "The Death of the Hired Man" "Mending Wall" 1916. Mountain Interval. New York: Holt "Birches" "Out, Out" "The Oven Bird" "The Road Not Taken" 1923. Selected Poems. New York: Holt. "The Runaway" Also includes poems from first three volumes 1923. New Hampshire. New York: Holt (London: Grant Richards, 1924) "Fire and Ice" "Nothing Gold Can Stay" "Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening" 1924. Several Short Poems. New York: Holt[67] 1928. Selected Poems. New York: Holt. 1928. West-Running Brook. New York: Holt "Acquainted with the Night" 1929. The Lovely Shall Be Choosers, The Poetry Quartos, printed and illustrated by Paul Johnston. Random House. 1930. Collected Poems of Robert Frost. New York: Holt (UK: Longmans Green, 1930) 1933. The Lone Striker. US: Knopf 1934. Selected Poems: Third Edition. New York: Holt 1935. Three Poems. Hanover, NH: Baker Library, Dartmouth College. 1935. The Gold Hesperidee. Bibliophile Press. 1936. From Snow to Snow. New York: Holt. 1936. A Further Range. New York: Holt (Cape, 1937) 1939. Collected Poems of Robert Frost. New York: Holt (UK: Longmans, Green, 1939) 1942. A Witness Tree. New York: Holt (Cape, 1943) "The Gift Outright" "A Question" "The Silken Tent" 1943. Come In, and Other Poems. New York: Holt. 1947. Steeple Bush. New York: Holt 1949. Complete Poems of Robert Frost. New York: Holt (Cape, 1951) 1951. Hard Not To Be King. House of Books. 1954. Aforesaid. New York: Holt. 1959. A Remembrance Collection of New Poems. New York: Holt. 1959. You Come Too. New York: Holt (UK: Bodley Head, 1964) 1962. In the Clearing. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston 1969. The Poetry of Robert Frost. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston. Plays 1929. A Way Out: A One Act Play (Harbor Press). 1929. The Cow's in the Corn: A One Act Irish Play in Rhyme (Slide Mountain Press). 1945. A Masque of Reason (Holt). 1947. A Masque of Mercy (Holt). Letters 1963. The Letters of Robert Frost to Louis Untermeyer (Holt, Rinehart & Winston; Cape, 1964). 1963. Robert Frost and John Bartlett: The Record of a Friendship, by Margaret Bartlett Anderson (Holt, Rinehart & Winston). 1964. Selected Letters of Robert Frost (Holt, Rinehart & Winston). 1972. Family Letters of Robert and Elinor Frost (State University of New York Press). 1981. Robert Frost and Sidney Cox: Forty Years of Friendship (University Press of New England). 2014. The Letters of Robert Frost, Volume 1, 1886–1920, edited by Donald Sheehy, Mark Richardson, and Robert Faggen. Belknap Press. ISBN 978-0674057609. (811 pages; first volume, of five, of the scholarly edition of the poet's correspondence, including many previously unpublished letters.) 2016. The Letters of Robert Frost, Volume 2, 1920–1928, edited by Donald Sheehy, Mark Richardson, Robert Bernard Hass, and Henry Atmore. Belknap Press. ISBN 978-0674726642. (848 pages; second volume of the series.) Other 1957. Robert Frost Reads His Poetry. Caedmon Records, TC1060. (spoken word) 1966. Interviews with Robert Frost (Holt, Rinehart & Winston; Cape, 1967). 1995. Collected Poems, Prose and Plays, edited by Richard Poirier. Library of America. ISBN 978-1-883011-06-2. (omnibus volume.) 2007. The Notebooks of Robert Frost, edited by Robert Faggen. Harvard University Press.[68] See also Biography portal Poetry portal List of poems by Robert Frost Frostiana New Hampshire Historical Marker No. 126: Robert Frost 1874–1963 Citations ^ "Robert Frost". The Poetry Foundation. Retrieved 18 February 2015. ^ a b "Robert Frost". Encyclopædia Britannica (Online ed.). 2008. Retrieved 2008-12-21. ^ Contemporary Literary Criticism. Ed. Jean C. Stine, Bridget Broderick, and Daniel G. Marowski. Vol. 26. Detroit: Gale Research, 1983. p110 ^ Watson, Marsten. Royal Families - Americans of Royal and Noble Ancestry. Volume Three: Samuel Appleton and His Wife Judith Everard and Five Generations of Their Descendants. 2010 ^ Ehrlich, Eugene; Carruth, Gorton (1982). The Oxford Illustrated Literary Guide to the United States. vol. 50. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-503186-5. ^ Nancy Lewis Tuten; John Zubizarreta (2001). The Robert Frost encyclopedia. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 145. ISBN 978-0-313-29464-8. Halfway through the spring semester of his second year, Dean Briggs released him from Harvard without prejudice, lamenting the loss of so good a student. ^ Jay Parini (2000). Robert Frost: A Life. Macmillan. pp. 64–65. ISBN 978-0-8050-6341-7. ^ Jeffrey Meyers (1996). Robert Frost: a biography. Houghton Mifflin. Frost remained at Harvard until March of his sophomore year, when he decamped in the middle of a term ... ^ Orr, David (2015-08-18). The Road Not Taken: Finding America in the Poem Everyone Loves and Almost Everyone Gets Wrong. Penguin. ISBN 9780698140899. ^ Meyers, Jeffrey (1996). Robert Frost: A Biography. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. pp. 107–109. ISBN 9780395728093. ^ "Phi Beta Kappa Authors". The Phi Beta Kappa Key. 6 (4): 237–240. 1926. JSTOR 42914052. ^ a b c "Resource: Voices & Visions". www.learner.org. Retrieved 2018-03-22. ^ "The 1924 Pulitzer Prize Winner in Poetry". Pulitzer.org. Retrieved 2018-03-22. ^ "The 1931 Pulitzer Prize Winner in Poetry". Pulitzer.org. Retrieved 2018-03-22. ^ "The 1937 Pulitzer Prize Winner in Poetry". Pulitzer.org. Retrieved 2018-03-22. ^ "The 1943 Pulitzer Prize Winner in Poetry". Pulitzer.org. Retrieved 2018-03-22. ^ "A Brief History of the Bread Loaf School of English". Middlebury Bread Loaf School of English. Retrieved February 11, 2018. ^ a b c Frost, Robert (1995). Poirier, Richard; Richardson, Mark (eds.). Collected Poems, Prose, & Plays. The Library of America. 81. New York: Library of America. ISBN 1-883011-06-X. ^ a b "Robert Frost Stone House Museum | Bennington College". www.bennington.edu. ^ a b c d Muir, Helen (1995). Frost in Florida: a memoir. Valiant Press. pp. 11, 17. ISBN 0-9633461-6-4. ^ "Office of the Clerk – U.S. House of Representatives, Congressional Gold Medal Recipients". ^ Parini, Jay (1999). Robert Frost: A Life. New York: Henry Holt and Company. pp. 408, 424–425. ISBN 9780805063417. ^ "The MacDowell Colony – Medal Day". Archived from the original on 2016-11-06. Retrieved 2015-07-02. ^ "John F. Kennedy: A Man of This Century". CBS. November 22, 1963. ^ "The Poet - Politician - JFK The Last Speech". JFK The Last Speech. Retrieved 2018-10-25. ^ Udall, Stewart L. (1972-06-11). "Robert Frost's Last Adventure". archive.nytimes.com. Retrieved 2018-10-25. ^ "When Robert Frost met Khrushchev". Christian Science Monitor. 2008-04-08. ISSN 0882-7729. Retrieved 2018-10-25. ^ Schachter, Aaron (2018-08-10). "Remembering John F. Kennedy's Last Speech". All Things Considered. Retrieved 2018-10-25. ^ "Robert Frost Collection". Jones Library, Inc. website, Amherst, Massachusetts. Archived from the original on 2009-06-12. Retrieved 2009-03-28. ^ Jarrell, Randall. "Fifty Years of American Poetry." No Other Book: Selected Essays. New York: HarperCollins, 1999. ^ Jarrell, Randall (1999) [1962]. "On 'Home Burial'". English Department at the University of Illinois. Retrieved October 18, 2018. ^ Jarrell, Randall. "To The Laodiceans." No Other Book: Selected Essays. New York: HarperCollins, 1999. ^ Jarrell, Randall. "Robert Frost's 'Home Burial.'" No Other Book: Selected Essays. New York: HarperCollins, 1999. ^ Leithauser, Brad. "Introduction." No Other Book: Selected Essays. New York: HarperCollins, 1999. ^ Nelson, Cary (2000). Anthology of Modern American Poetry. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 84. ISBN 0-19-512270-4. ^ Jarrell, Randall. "Fifty Years of American Poetry." No Other Book: Selected Essays. HarperCollins, 1999. ^ "Birches by Robert Frost". The Poetry Foundation. Retrieved 18 February 2015. ^ McGrath, Charles. "The Vicissitudes of Literary Reputation." The New York Times Magazine. 15 June 2003. ^ a b c Ellman, Richard and Robert O'Clair. The Norton Anthology of Modern Poetry, Second Edition. New York: Norton, 1988. ^ Faggen, Robert (2001). Editor (First ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ^ "Robert Frost". Poetry Foundation. Poetry Foundation. 2018-03-21. Retrieved 2018-03-22.CS1 maint: others (link) ^ Squires, Radcliffe. The Major Themes of Robert Frost, The University of Michigan Press, 1963. pp. 106-107. ^ Bacon, Helen. "Frost and the Ancient Muses." The Cambridge Companion to Robert Frost. Cambridge University Press, 2001, pp. 75-99 ^ a b c d Contemporary Literary Criticism. Ed. Jean C. Stine, Bridget Broderick, and Daniel G. Marowski. Vol. 26. Detroit: Gale Research, 1983. p 110–129. ^ Foundation, Poetry (March 16, 2019). "Edward Thomas". Poetry Foundation. ^ "Nomination Archive". NobelPrize.org. ^ Robert Frost (2007). The Collected Prose of Robert Frost. Harvard University Press. p. 289. ISBN 978-0-674-02463-2. ^ Nancy Lewis Tuten; John Zubizarreta (2001). The Robert Frost Encyclopedia. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 15. ISBN 978-0-313-29464-8. ^ Deirdre J. Fagan (1 January 2009). Critical Companion to Robert Frost: A Literary Reference to His Life and Work. Infobase Publishing. p. 249. ISBN 978-1-4381-0854-4. ^ Vermont. Office of Secretary of State (1985). Vermont Legislative Directory and State Manual: Biennial session. p. 19. Joint Resolution R-59 of the Acts of l96l named Robert Lee Frost as Vermont's Poet Laureate. While not a native Vermonter, this eminent American poet resided here throughout much of his adult ... ^ Vermont Legislative Directory and State Manual. Secretary of State. 1989. p. 20. The position was created by Joint Resolution R-59 of the Acts of 1961, which designated Robert Frost state poet laureate. ^ "History". Southern New Hampshire University. Retrieved September 6, 2017. ^ "My Brush with History - "We Heard the Shots …": Aboard the Press Bus in Dallas 40 Years Ago" (PDF). med.navy.mil. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 26, 2012. Retrieved June 30, 2013. ^ Davis, Sid; Bennett, Susan; Trost, Catherine ‘Cathy’; Rather, Daniel ‘Dan’ Irvin Jr (2004). "Return To The White House". President Kennedy Has Been Shot: Experience The Moment-to-Moment Account of The Four Days That Changed America. Newseum (illustrated ed.). Naperville, IL: Sourcebooks. p. 173. ISBN 1-4022-0317-9. Retrieved December 10, 2011 – via Google Books. ^ https://www.footwa.com/and-miles-to-go-before-i-sleep/2187/ ^ "George R.R. Martin: "Trying to please everyone is a horrible mistake"". www.adriasnews.com. Retrieved 2018-03-22. ^ "Five Fascinating Facts about Game of Thrones". Interesting Literature. 2014-05-06. Retrieved 2018-03-22. ^ "MUSIC | New Found Glory". www.newfoundglory.com. Retrieved 2016-08-03. ^ "Justin Trudeau's eulogy". On This Day. Toronto, ON, CA: CBC Radio. October 3, 2000. Retrieved December 10, 2011. ^ "No. 2799: Original, Original Strip". mezzacotta. Retrieved 26 November 2019. ^ "Daily Comic Strip on October 20th, 2002". Garfield.com. ^ "Robert Frost – 5 Poems from NEW HAMPSHIRE (Newly released to the Public Domain)". Englewood Review of Books. Retrieved 26 November 2019. ^ Stephen M. Deusner (2014-06-12). "First Aid Kit: Stay Gold Album Review". Pitchfork. Retrieved 2016-10-06. ^ "Lana Del Rey – Venice Bitch Lyrics | Genius Lyrics". Genius.com. Retrieved 2019-12-29. ^ "Lana Del Rey – Music To Watch Boys To Lyrics | Genius Lyrics". Genius.com. Retrieved 2020-01-01. ^ "Robert Frost. 1915. A Boy's Will". www.bartleby.com. Retrieved 2018-03-22. ^ Frost, Robert (March 16, 1924). Several short poems. Place of publication not identified. OCLC 1389446. ^ "Browse Subjects, Series, and Libraries | Harvard University Press". www.hup.harvard.edu. General sources Pritchard, William H. (2000). "Frost's Life and Career". Retrieved March 18, 2001. Taylor, Welford Dunaway (1996). Robert Frost and J. J. Lankes: Riders on Pegasus. Hanover, New Hampshire: Dartmouth College Library. OCLC 1036107807. "Vandalized Frost house drew a crowd". Burlington Free Press, January 8, 2008. Robert Frost (1995). Collected Poems, Prose, & Plays. Edited by Richard Poirier and Mark Richardson. Library of America. ISBN 1-883011-06-X (trade paperback). Robert Frost Biographical Information External links Wikimedia Commons has media related to Robert Frost. Wikiquote has quotations related to: Robert Frost Wikisource has original works written by or about: Robert Frost Robert Frost: Profile, Poems, Essays at Poets.org Robert Frost, profile and poems at the Poetry Foundation Profile at Modern American Poetry Richard Poirier (Summer–Fall 1960). "Robert Frost, The Art of Poetry No. 2". The Paris Review. Robert Frost Collection in Special Collections, Jones Library, Amherst, MA Robert Frost Collection in Archives and Special Collections, Amherst College, Amherst, MA Robert Frost at Bread Loaf (Middlebury College) The Victor E. Reichert Robert Frost Collection from the University at Buffalo Libraries Poetry Collection Robert Frost Farm in Derry, NH The Frost Foundation The Frost Place, a museum and poetry conference center in Franconia, N.H. Robert Frost reading his poems at Harper Audio (recordings from 1956) Yale College Lecture on Robert Frost audio, video and full transcripts of Open Yale Courses Works by Robert Frost at Project Gutenberg Works by Robert (Robert Lee) Frost at Faded Page (Canada) Works by or about Robert Frost at Internet Archive Works by Robert Frost at LibriVox (public domain audiobooks) Robert Frost Collection at Dartmouth College Library Robert Frost Declares Himself a "Balfour Israelite" and Discusses His Trip to the Western Wall Drawing of Robert Frost by Wilfred Byron Shaw at University of Michigan Museum of Art Robert Frost book collection and Robert Frost papers at the University of Maryland Libraries v t e Robert Frost Poems "Acquainted with the Night" "After Apple-Picking" "Birches" "The Death of the Hired Man" "Fire and Ice" "The Gift Outright" "Mending Wall" "Nothing Gold Can Stay" "Out, Out—" "The Oven Bird" "A Question" "The Road Not Taken" "Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening" Poetry collections A Boy's Will North of Boston Mountain Interval New Hampshire West-Running Brook Collected Poems of Robert Frost A Further Range A Witness Tree In the Clearing Plays A Masque of Reason Related Robert Frost Farm, New Hampshire The Frost Place, Home and Museum Robert Frost Farm (Ripton, Vermont) Robert Frost Farm (South Shaftsbury, Vermont) Robert Frost House, Massachusetts Robert Frost Medal Frostiana (1959 choral art) Robert Frost: A Lover's Quarrel with the World (1963 documentary) Robert Frost: A Life (2000 biography) v t e Poets Laureate / Consultants in Poetry to the Library of Congress Joseph Auslander (1937) Allen Tate (1943) Robert Penn Warren (1944) Louise Bogan (1945) Karl Shapiro (1946) Robert Lowell (1947) Léonie Adams (1948) Elizabeth Bishop (1949) Conrad Aiken (1950) William Carlos Williams (1952) Randall Jarrell (1956) Robert Frost (1958) Richard Eberhart (1959) Louis Untermeyer (1961) Howard Nemerov (1963) Reed Whittemore (1964) Stephen Spender (1965) James Dickey (1966) William Jay Smith (1968) William Stafford (1970) Josephine Jacobsen (1971) Daniel Hoffman (1973) Stanley Kunitz (1974) Robert Hayden (1976) William Meredith (1978) Maxine Kumin (1981) Anthony Hecht (1982) Reed Whittemore (1984) Robert Fitzgerald (1984) Gwendolyn Brooks (1985) Robert Penn Warren (1986) Richard Wilbur (1987) Howard Nemerov (1988) Mark Strand (1990) Joseph Brodsky (1991) Mona Van Duyn (1992) Rita Dove (1993) Robert Hass (1995) Robert Pinsky (1997) Rita Dove, Louise Glück & W. S. Merwin (1999) Stanley Kunitz (2000) Billy Collins (2001) Louise Glück (2003) Ted Kooser (2004) Donald Hall (2006) Charles Simic (2007) Kay Ryan (2008–2010) W. S. Merwin (2010–2011) Philip Levine (2011–2012) Natasha Trethewey (2012–2014) Charles Wright (2014–2015) Juan Felipe Herrera (2015–2017) Tracy K. Smith (2017–2019) Joy Harjo (2019–present) v t e Pulitzer Prize for Poetry (1922–1950) Edwin Arlington Robinson (1922) Edna St. Vincent Millay (1923) Robert Frost (1924) Edwin Arlington Robinson (1925) Amy Lowell (1926) Leonora Speyer (1927) Edwin Arlington Robinson (1928) Stephen Vincent Benét (1929) Conrad Aiken (1930) Robert Frost (1931) George Dillon (1932) Archibald MacLeish (1933) Robert Hillyer (1934) Audrey Wurdemann (1935) Robert P. T. Coffin (1936) Robert Frost (1937) Marya Zaturenska (1938) John Gould Fletcher (1939) Mark Van Doren (1940) Leonard Bacon (1941) William Rose Benét (1942) Robert Frost (1943) Stephen Vincent Benét (1944) Karl Shapiro (1945) Robert Lowell (1947) W. H. Auden (1948) Peter Viereck (1949) Gwendolyn Brooks (1950) Complete list (1922–1950) (1951–1975) (1976–2000) (2001–2025) Authority control BIBSYS: 90052363 BNE: XX876342 BNF: cb12025599b (data) CANTIC: a1691112x CiNii: DA01305841 GND: 118703366 ISNI: 0000 0001 2126 6607 LCCN: n79005644 LNB: 000034567 MBA: e99ee665-584d-4f1e-8f12-c85f35c294b8 NARA: 10582628 NDL: 00440276 NKC: jn19990002466 NLA: 35105860 NLG: 95049 NLK: KAC199609432 NSK: 000101926 NTA: 068460082 SELIBR: 187609 SNAC: w6fk35s7 SUDOC: 028416899 Trove: 828244 ULAN: 500260165 VcBA: 495/130335 VIAF: 32010055 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n79005644 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Robert_Frost&oldid=996632070" Categories: Robert Frost 1874 births 1963 deaths 19th-century American poets 20th-century American poets American Poets Laureate American male poets American people of English descent American people of Scottish descent Amherst College faculty Appleton family Bollingen Prize recipients Burials in Vermont Congressional Gold Medal recipients Dartmouth College alumni Formalist poets Harvard University alumni Harvard University faculty Members of the American Philosophical Society Middlebury College faculty People from Bennington, Vermont People from Derry, New Hampshire People from Franconia, New Hampshire People from Lawrence, Massachusetts Phillips family (New England) Plymouth State University people Poets Laureate of Vermont Poets from California Poets from Massachusetts Poets from New Hampshire Poets from Vermont Pulitzer Prize for Poetry winners Sonneteers University of Michigan faculty Writers from San Francisco Hidden categories: CS1: long volume value CS1 maint: others CS1: Julian–Gregorian uncertainty Articles with short description Short description matches Wikidata Wikipedia pages semi-protected against vandalism Commons link is on Wikidata Articles with Project Gutenberg links Articles with Internet Archive links Articles with LibriVox links Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CANTIC identifiers Wikipedia articles with CINII identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with LNB identifiers Wikipedia articles with MusicBrainz identifiers Wikipedia articles with NARA identifiers Wikipedia articles with NDL identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLG identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NSK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SNAC-ID identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with Trove identifiers Wikipedia articles with ULAN identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers AC with 25 elements Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read View source View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikiquote Wikisource Languages Afrikaans العربية অসমীয়া Asturianu تۆرکجه বাংলা Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ Български Català Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Davvisámegiella Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français Gaeilge Galego 한국어 Հայերեն हिन्दी Hrvatski Bahasa Indonesia Italiano עברית Kabɩyɛ ಕನ್ನಡ ქართული Kiswahili Kurdî Latina Latviešu Magyar Македонски Malagasy മലയാളം मराठी مصرى Nederlands नेपाली 日本語 Norsk bokmål Norsk nynorsk ਪੰਜਾਬੀ پنجابی Polski Português Română Русский Scots Shqip Simple English Slovenščina کوردی Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Tagalog தமிழ் ไทย Тоҷикӣ Türkçe Українська Tiếng Việt Winaray 吴语 粵語 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 27 December 2020, at 19:44 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1184 ---- Category:Wikipedia articles with NLP identifiers - Wikipedia Help Category:Wikipedia articles with NLP identifiers From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search This category is for articles with NLP identifiers. Please do not add subcategories. For more information, see Wikipedia:Authority control. Administrators: Please do not delete this category even if it is empty! This category may be empty occasionally or even most of the time. This is a maintenance category, used for maintenance of the Wikipedia project. It is not part of the encyclopedia and contains non-article pages, or groups articles by status rather than subject. Do not include this category in content categories. This is a tracking category. It builds and maintains a list of pages primarily for the sake of the list itself. They are not part of the encyclopedia's categorization scheme. This category is hidden on its member pages—unless the corresponding user preference (appearance → show hidden categories) is set. These categories are used to track, build and organize lists of pages needing "attention en masse" (for example, pages using deprecated syntax), or that may need to be edited at someone's earliest convenience. These categories also serve to aggregate members of several lists or sub-categories into a larger, more efficient list (discriminated by classifications). Contents: Top 0–9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z * # 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 • A Aa Ae Aj Ao At • B Ba Be Bj Bo Bt • C Ca Ce Cj Co Ct • D Da De Dj Do Dt • E Ea Ee Ej Eo Et • F Fa Fe Fj Fo Ft • G Ga Ge Gj Go Gt • H Ha He Hj Ho Ht • I Ia Ie Ij Io It • J Ja Je Jj Jo Jt • K Ka Ke Kj Ko Kt • L La Le Lj Lo Lt • M Ma Me Mj Mo Mt • N Na Ne Nj No Nt • O Oa Oe Oj Oo Ot • P Pa Pe Pj Po Pt • Q Qa Qe Qj Qo Qt • R Ra Re Rj Ro Rt • S Sa Se Sj So St • T Ta Te Tj To Tt • U Ua Ue Uj Uo Ut • V Va Ve Vj Vo Vt • W Wa We Wj Wo Wt • X Xa Xe Xj Xo Xt • Y Ya Ye Yj Yo Yt • Z Za Ze Zj Zo Zt Pages in this category should only be added by Module:Authority control. Pages in category "Wikipedia articles with NLP identifiers" The following 200 pages are in this category, out of approximately 17,713 total. This list may not reflect recent changes (learn more). (previous page) (next page)A A-Company Filmed Entertainment Pieter van der Aa Asger Aaboe Hans von Aachen Kim Fupz Aakeson Caroline Aaron Jane Aaron (educator) Izaak Aaronowicz Mark Aarons Espen Aarseth Aart van der Leeuw Evald Aav Juhan Aavik Joseph Abaco Magdalena Abakanowicz Vladimir Abashev Gustav Abb Claudio Abbado Abbey Theatre Andrew Abbott Bruce Abbott Scott Abbott (screenwriter) Abd al-Malik ibn Marwan Jean Mohamed Ben Abdeljlil Muddathir Abdel-Rahim ʻAbdu'l-Bahá Paula Abdul Chingiz Abdullayev Kamal Mehdi Abdullayev Kōbō Abe Yael Abecassis Julius Friedrich Heinrich Abegg Brian Abel-Smith Clamor Heinrich Abel Jack Abel Wilhelm Abel Bernhard Rudolf Abeken Hal Abelson Wolfgang Abendroth Johann Joseph Abert Johannes Abezier Johann Heinrich Abicht Edmond François Valentin About Ben Abraham Karl Abraham Roman Abraham Maurice Abrahams Peter Abrahams Fedir Abramov Kazimierz Abramowicz Emil Ábrányi Paweł Abratkiewicz Zequinha de Abreu Johannes Abromeit Hans Erasmus Aßmann David Abulafia Académie des Beaux-Arts Académie royale de langue et de littérature françaises de Belgique Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences Narziß Ach Guy Achard Dag Achatz Chinua Achebe Arthur Achleitner Osman Achmatowicz Joaquín Achúcarro Valens Acidalius Diane Ackerman Lauren Ackerman Rudolph Ackermann Désiré Acket J. L. Ackrill Nicola Acocella Émile Acollas Soledad Acosta George Acsinteanu Joannes Actuarius Alex Acuña Carlo Acutis Amir Aczel János Aczél (mathematician) John Adair (author) Duke Adam of Württemberg Adolphe Adam Barbara Adam Eugen Adam Franz Adam Graeme Mercer Adam Jenő Ádám Melchior Adam Paul Adam (French novelist) Robert Adam Robert M. Adam Wilhelm Adam Marzenna Adamczyk Friedrich Wilhelm Adami Emil Adamič Kasia Adamik Salvatore Adamo Vicko Adamović Paweł Adamowicz Brooke Adams (actress) Douglas Adams John Adams John Adams (educationist) Joseph Quincy Adams Jr. Thomas Sewall Adams Tony Adams William Davenport Adams Anthony Adamson Chuck Adamson Jennie Adamson Ella Adayevskaya Alison Adburgham Dawn Addams Cannonball Adderley William Edward Addis Joseph Addison Paul Addison Adele Lucie Adelsberger Sheldon Adelson Konrad Adenauer Clément Ader Erich Adickes Isabelle Adjani Friedrich Adler (architect) H. G. Adler Samuel Adler (composer) Roland Adlerberth Ado of Vienne Adolph John I, Count Palatine of Kleeburg John Adolphus Hannes Adomeit Pope Adrian IV Pope Adrian VI Joseph Adshead Albert Adu Boahen Adunis Pankaj Advani (director) Irene Aebi Max Aebi Anneli Aejmelaeus Claudius Aelianus Aelita Aelius Theon Richard Aellen Ælnoth of Canterbury Aeschylus Æthelflæd Æthelred the Unready Nicholas Afanasiev Georgiy Afanasyev Afromental Roman Aftanazy Alfred Agache (painter) Giorgio Agamben Agapius of Hierapolis Louis Agassiz Evandro Agazzi Klaus Ager Milton Ager István Ágh (poet) Andreas Agnellus Johannes Agnoli Jean-Louis Agobet Robert Agranoff Alexander Agricola Sergio Aguayo Anna Aguilar-Amat Roberto Aguirre-Sacasa José Antonio Aguirre (politician) Javier Aguirresarobe Milena Agus Zvi Aharoni Bertie Ahern Frederick Ahl Johann Rudolph Ahle Hans von Ahlfen Fenar Ahmad Moudud Ahmed Kalevi Aho Johan Jacob Ahrenberg Heinrich Ahrens Helene Ahrweiler Johann Caspar Aiblinger Danny Aiello Suzanne Aigrain Liam Aiken John Aikin Anouk Aimée A. J. Aitken Babatunde Aiyegbusi Vangel Ajanovski-Oče Akademie Verlag Jan van Aken (writer) George Akerlof Jonas Åkerlund Janusz Akermann Bella Akhmadulina (previous page) (next page) Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Wikipedia_articles_with_NLP_identifiers&oldid=908338449" Categories: Pages with NLP identifiers Wikipedia articles with authority control information Hidden categories: Hidden categories Tracking categories Template Large category TOC via CatAutoTOC on category with 10,001–20,000 pages CatAutoTOC generates Large category TOC Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Category Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Afrikaans 한국어 Ilokano עברית 日本語 Sardu Scots Suomi Türkçe Edit links This page was last edited on 29 July 2019, at 02:52 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1187 ---- Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori - Wikipedia Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Quote from Horace's Odes Detail of the inscription over the rear entrance to Memorial Amphitheater at Arlington National Cemetery in Arlington, Virginia. The inscription reads: "Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori". Dulcē et decōrum est prō patriā mōrī[a] is a line from the Odes (III.2.13) by the Roman lyric poet Horace. The line translates: "It is sweet and fitting to die for the homeland." The Latin word patria (homeland), literally meaning the country of one's fathers (in Latin, patres) or ancestors, is the source of the French word for a country, patrie, and of the English word "patriot" (one who loves his country). Horace's line was quoted in the title of a poem by Wilfred Owen, "Dulce et Decorum est", published in 1921, describing soldiers' horrific experiences in World War I. Owen's poem, which calls Horace's line "the old Lie", essentially ended the line's straightforward uncritical use. Before 1920, the phrase had tended to appear in memorials and monuments to the fallen; after 1921, it tended to decry war propaganda. Contents 1 Context 2 Uses in art and literature 3 Use as a motto and inscription 3.1 Organizations 4 See also 5 Notes 6 References 7 External links Context[edit] The poem from which the line comes, exhorts Roman citizens to develop martial prowess such that the enemies of Rome, in particular the Parthians, will be too terrified to resist the Romans. In John Conington's translation, the relevant passage reads: Angustam amice pauperiem pati robustus acri militia puer condiscat et Parthos ferocis vexet eques metuendus hasta vitamque sub divo et trepidis agat in rebus. Illum ex moenibus hosticis matrona bellantis tyranni prospiciens et adulta virgo suspiret, eheu, ne rudis agminum sponsus lacessat regius asperum tactu leonem, quem cruenta per medias rapit ira caedes. Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori: mors et fugacem persequitur virum nec parcit inbellis iuventae poplitibus timidove tergo.[1] To suffer hardness with good cheer, In sternest school of warfare bred, Our youth should learn; let steed and spear Make him one day the Parthian's dread; Cold skies, keen perils, brace his life. Methinks I see from rampired town Some battling tyrant's matron wife, Some maiden, look in terror down,— “Ah, my dear lord, untrain'd in war! O tempt not the infuriate mood Of that fell lion I see! from far He plunges through a tide of blood!” What joy, for fatherland to die! Death's darts e'en flying feet o'ertake, Nor spare a recreant chivalry, A back that cowers, or loins that quake.[2] A humorous elaboration of the original line was used as a toast in the 19th century: "Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori, sed dulcius pro patria vivere, et dulcissimum pro patria bibere. Ergo, bibamus pro salute patriae." A reasonable English translation would be: "It is sweet and fitting to die for the homeland, but sweeter still to live for the homeland, and sweetest yet to drink for the homeland. So, let us drink to the health of the homeland." Uses in art and literature[edit] Perhaps the most famous modern use of the phrase is as the title of a poem, "Dulce et Decorum est", by British poet Wilfred Owen during World War I. Owen's poem describes a gas attack during World War I and is one of his many anti-war poems that were not published until after the war ended. In the final lines of the poem, the Horatian phrase is described as "the old lie".[3] It is believed, and illustrated by the original copy of the poem, that Owen intended to dedicate the poem ironically to Jessie Pope, a popular writer who glorified the war and recruited "laddies" who "longed to charge and shoot" in simplistically patriotic poems like "The Call".[4] "Died some, pro patria, non 'dulce' non 'et decor' ..." from part IV of Ezra Pound's "Hugh Selwyn Mauberley", a damning indictment of World War I; "Daring as never before, wastage as never before." In a 1915 school essay, German playwright Bertolt Brecht referred to the phrase as Zweckpropaganda (cheap propaganda for a specific cause) and pointed out that "It is sweeter and more fitting to live for one's country", an essay for which he was nearly expelled.[5] The title of Damon Knight's 1955 short story "Dulcie and Decorum" is an ironic play on the first three words of the phrase; the story is about computers that induce humans to kill themselves. The film Johnny Got His Gun ends with this saying, along with casualty statistics since World War I. In the film All Quiet on the Western Front, a teacher quotes this early on while talking to his class. In his book And No Birds Sang, chronicling his service in Italy with the Canadian army during World War II, Farley Mowat quotes Wilfred Owen's poem on the opening pages and addresses "the Old Lie" in the final section of the book. Tim O'Brien quotes the line in the book If I Die in a Combat Zone, Box Me Up and Ship Me Home. In Margaret Mitchell's Gone with the Wind, the Tarleton brothers are buried under a tombstone which bears the phrase. The last words attributed to the Israeli national hero Yosef Trumpeldor – "It is good to die for our country" (טוב למות בעד ארצנו) – are considered to be derived from Horace's, and were a frequently used Zionist slogan in the early 20th century. In William Makepeace Thackeray's novel Vanity Fair, the quote appears on George Osborne's tombstone after he dies at Waterloo. In Thomas Wolfe's Look Homeward, Angel: A Story of the Buried Life, after the outbreak of World War I, adolescent Eugene, encouraged by his teacher, Margaret Leonard, devours stories of wartime courage (R. Brooke's "If I Should die ..." and R. Hanky's A Student in Arms), and fueled by these stories, composes his own, to the ever-present literary-referenced commentary by Wolfe. Karl Marlantes' novel Matterhorn: A Novel of the Vietnam War features a mock-mass between Mellas and others, in which the line is satirically quoted. The British rock band Kasabian includes the phrase at the end of the music video for their song "Empire".[6] The British rock band The Damned released a single named "In Dulce Decorum" in 1987. The song The Latin One by 10,000 Maniacs sets the poem by Owen to music and includes the phrase. American band Kamelot quotes the line in the song "Memento Mori", from their seventh album, The Black Halo. Scottish rock band The Skids include a song named "Dulce Et Decorum Est (Pro Patria Mori)" on the album Days in Europa in 1979. British folk-metal band Skyclad uses the quote in the song "Jeopardy", in their album The Silent Whales of Lunar Sea.[7] The British dark cabaret act The Tiger Lillies include a song called "Dulce et Decorum Est" in the album A Dream Turns Sour from 2014. This is a reading of the Wilfred Owen poem with music written by Martyn Jacques.[8] In Kenneth Branagh's film version of Mozart's "The Magic Flute", Sarastro's palace has the quote engraved across its entrance. The line is quoted in the 1966 movie "Modesty Blaise," after a plane is apparently shot down. The line appears as a Morse coded message as part of a puzzle in the 2016 videogame Battlefield 1. Use as a motto and inscription[edit] This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (March 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) Plaque at the Graceville War Memorial, Queensland, Australia Australia The phrase appears prominently on a plaque at AMA House, Sydney commemorating fallen members of the New South Wales branch of the British Medical Association. The phrase can be found at the Graceville War Memorial, Graceville, Queensland. Brazil The phrase can be found at the Monument to the Expeditionary (Monumento ao Expedicionário) in Alegrete city, state of Rio Grande do Sul. Plaque at Queen's Park in Toronto dedicated to the militia that put down the North-West Rebellion Canada Queen's Park in Toronto includes a monument to the militia members who died putting down the North-West Rebellion with the phrase. The phrase appears on a bronze plaque bearing the names of Canadian soldiers lost from the city of Calgary during World War I and World War II at Central Memorial High School's front entrance.[9] The phrase is found on the Great War cenotaph in Phoenix, British Columbia [10] Cuba The phrase was prominently inscribed in a large bronze tablet commemorating Cuban patriot Calixto García, Major-General of the Spanish–American War. The tablet was erected by the Freemasons where he died at the Raleigh Hotel in Washington, D.C. Today, this tablet resides at the private residence of one of García's direct descendants. Dominican Republic The phrase is inscribed in bronze letters above the arch of the Puerta del Conde in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic. India Found on the inscription on the French Monument in Shillong, Meghalaya for the soldiers of the 26th Khasi Labour Corps who died during World War I (1917–1918). The inscription is also seen on the rear-quarter of the Memorial Tablet in the front garden of St Joseph's Boys' High School, Bangalore in memory of the Old Boys of the school who died in the Great War (1914–1918). A statue of St Joseph with Infant Jesus now stands upon the tablet. Italy The verse is engraved in each medallion in the center of the crosses of Aquileia's Cemetery of the Heroes, dedicated to every soldier died during the First World War. This is the place from which, in October 1921, the Unknown Soldier departed in the direction of the Altare Patria in Rome. New Zealand The phrase is found on the memorial archway at the entrance of Otago Boys' High School in Dunedin. Pakistan The phrase is written on a plaque on the left wall of main entrance of the Patiala Block, King Edward Medical University, Lahore. It commemorates the students and graduates of the institution who died in the First World War. Spain The phrase is scribed on the tomb of Major William Martin, a fictional Royal Marine officer whose death was concocted as part of Operation Mincemeat, in the cemetery of Nuestra Señora in Huelva. Sweden The phrase can be found inscribed on the outer wall of an old war fort within the Friseboda nature reserve in Sweden. United Kingdom The phrase was inscribed on the wall of the chapel of the Royal Military Academy Sandhurst in 1913.[11] It is also inscribed on the Parish Roll of Honour for Devoran in Cornwall, hanging in the Village Hall.[12] United States The phrase can be found at the front entrance to the Arlington Memorial Amphitheater at the Arlington National Cemetery, which was constructed from 1915 to 1920 – just before Owen's poem was published. The phrase is carved in the monument commemorating the Battle of Wyoming (Pennsylvania), known as the Wyoming Massacre, 3 July 1778, erected 3 July 1878. The phrase is located on the second monument of the Point Lookout Confederate Cemetery in Point Lookout, Maryland, and at the Confederate Cemetery in the Manassas National Battlefield Park. Organizations[edit] Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori is the motto of the following organizations: The Portuguese Military Academy (Academia Militar)[13][14] The Royal Grammar School, Newcastle upon Tyne (former motto) The 103rd Ground Reconnaissance Squadron of the Royal Netherlands Army The 10/27 Royal South Australian Regiment of the Royal Australian Infantry Corps adopted Pro Patria derived from the above line meaning "For One's Country" as their unit motto. The shorter phrase Pro Patria ("for the homeland") may or may be not related to the Horace quote: Pro Patria is the motto of the Higgins or O'Huigan clan. It is the motto of the Sri Lanka Army as well as being inscribed on the collar insignia of the Royal Canadian Regiment. Pro Patria is the name of a neighborhood in Caracas, Venezuela. See also[edit] Tellus of Athens Dulce (disambiguation) Decorum Patria (disambiguation) Mori Notes[edit] ^ Latin pronunciation: [ˈd̪ʊɫ̪.keː ɛt̪ d̪ɛˈkoː.rʊ̃ˑ ɛst̪ proː ˈpa.t̪ri.aː ˈmoː.riː] Ecclesiastical Latin: [ˈd̪ul̠ʲ.t͡ʃɛ ɛt̪ d̪ɛˈkɔː.rum ɛst̪ prɔ ˈpaː.t̪ri.a ˈmɔː.ri] References[edit] ^ "Horace: Odes III". thelatinlibrary.com. ^ "Q. Horatius Flaccus (Horace), Odes, Book 3, Poem 2". ^ "Dulce et Decorum Est by Wilfred Owen". Poemhunter.com. Retrieved 20 July 2013. ^ "Copy of archival record". Archived from the original on 17 March 2014. Retrieved 17 March 2014. ^ Hässler, Hans-Jürgen; von Heusinger, Christian, eds. (1989). Kultur gegen Krieg, Wissenschaft für den Frieden [Culture against War, Science for Peace] (in German). Würzburg, Germany: Königshausen & Neumann. ISBN 978-3884794012. ^ KasabianVEVO (3 October 2009). "Kasabian - Empire" – via YouTube. ^ "Jeopardy - Skyclad". ^ The Tiger Lillies (18 June 2014). ""Dulce et Decorum Est" by The Tiger Lillies" – via YouTube. ^ "Calgary Board of Education - Central Memorial High School". Schools.cbe.ab.ca. 30 June 2013. Archived from the original on 23 July 2013. Retrieved 2013-07-20. ^ https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e3/WWI_Cenotaph_Phoenix_BC_Canda.jpg ^ Law, Francis (1983). A man at arms: memoirs of two world wars. London: Collins. p. 44. ISBN 0-00-217057-4. ^ "Roll of Honour of Devoran men who served in WW1, Devoran Village Hall". 13 January 2014. ^ [1] Archived 11 March 2008 at the Wayback Machine ^ [2] Archived 27 September 2007 at the Wayback Machine External links[edit] Latin text of Horace's Ode Wilfred Owen's poem Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dulce_et_decorum_est_pro_patria_mori&oldid=993219035" Categories: War poetry Latin words and phrases Horace Hidden categories: Articles containing Latin-language text CS1 German-language sources (de) Webarchive template wayback links Articles with short description Short description matches Wikidata Use dmy dates from July 2019 Use British English from December 2016 Articles needing additional references from March 2013 All articles needing additional references Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Languages Brezhoneg Català Čeština Español Français Interlingua Italiano עברית Latina Lingua Franca Nova Português Српски / srpski Edit links This page was last edited on 9 December 2020, at 12:31 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-120 ---- Orosius - Wikipedia Orosius From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search For other uses, see Orosius (disambiguation). Orosius Paulus Orosius, shown in a miniature from the Saint-Epure codex. Born c. 375 AD Braga, Gallaecia Died c. 418 AD Occupation Theologian and historian Academic background Influences Augustine of Hippo Livy Jerome Junianus Justinus Tacitus Suetonius Florus Academic work Main interests Providentialism Universal history Germanic paganism Paulus Orosius (/ˈpɔːləs əˈroʊʒəs/; born c. 375, died after 418 AD)[1], less often Paul Orosius in English, was a Roman priest, historian and theologian, and a student of Augustine of Hippo. It is possible that he was born in Bracara Augusta (now Braga, Portugal), then capital of the Roman province of Gallaecia, which would have been the capital of the Kingdom of the Suebi by his death.[2] Although there are some questions regarding his biography, such as his exact date of birth, it is known that he was a person of some prestige from a cultural point of view, as he had contact with the greatest figures of his time such as Augustine of Hippo and Jerome of Stridon. In order to meet with them Orosius travelled to cities on the southern coast of the Mediterranean Sea, such as Hippo Regius, Alexandria, and Jerusalem. These journeys defined his life and intellectual output. Orosius did not just discuss theological matters with Saint Augustine; he also collaborated with him on the book City of God.[3] In addition, in 415 he was chosen to travel to Palestine in order to exchange information with other intellectuals. He was also able to participate in a Church Council meeting in Jerusalem on the same trip and he was entrusted with transporting the relics of Saint Stephen. The date of his death is also unclear, although it appears to have not been earlier than 418, when he finished one of his books, or later than 423.[4] He wrote a total of three books, of which his most important is his Seven Books of History Against the Pagans (Latin: Historiarum Adversum Paganos Libri VII), considered to be one of the books with the greatest impact on historiography during the period between antiquity and the Middle Ages, as well as being one of the most important Hispanic books of all time. Part of its importance comes from the fact that the author shows his historiographical methodology. The book is a historical narration focusing on the pagan peoples from the earliest time up until the time Orosius was alive.[5] Orosius was a highly influential figure both for the dissemination of information (History Against the Pagans was one of the main sources of information regarding Antiquity that was used up to the Renaissance) and for rationalising the study of history (his methodology greatly influenced later historians).[6][7] Contents 1 Biographical sources 2 Questions regarding his identity 2.1 Name 2.2 Ó Corráin's conclusions 2.3 Birthplace 2.4 Date of birth 3 Biography 3.1 Early life 3.2 Journey to Africa 3.3 Journeys to Palestine 3.4 Later years 3.5 Disappearance 4 His works 4.1 Commonitorium and Liber Apologeticus 4.2 Historiae Adversus Paganos 5 Historical methodology 5.1 Universalism 5.2 Patriotism and universalism 5.3 Optimism and pessimism 5.4 Narrative 5.5 The importance of geography 5.6 Sources used by Orosius 6 Impact of Orosius’s work 7 See also 8 Notes 9 References 10 External links Biographical sources[edit] Despite the importance of his books many questions remain regarding his life, hampering efforts to construct a biography with any certainty. This is particularly true for sources of information regarding his birth and death.[8] However, his life has been widely studied and there are a number of authors who propose dates for both events. The main biographical references for Orosius come from the writings of Gennadius of Massilia and Braulio of Zaragoza, although his own writings should not be overlooked.[8] In addition, Orosius is mentioned in letters written by Saint Augustine. Questions regarding his identity[edit] Name[edit] While there is no doubt regarding his surname of Orosius, there are questions regarding the use of the name "Paulus". Basically the problem is that it is not completely certain if he used this name or if he was simply called Orosius and whether Paulus has been added with the passing of time. This could have happened given that the initial "P" for priest was always placed next to his name, and over time this could have led to the confusion.[9] However, this idea is flawed as authors writing immediately after Orosius's death use the name Paulus. In fact, even Casimiro Torres Rodríguez, one of the main scholars of Orosius's life, indicates that Paulus might be his Christian name and Orosius his native name, a theory that cannot be entirely dismissed.[9] Whatever the truth of the matter this subject has been widely studied and the most current theory is probably that of Pedro Martínez Cavero, another important Orosius scholar.[10] Ó Corráin's conclusions[edit] Based on a careful reading of the relevant sources, Irish scholar Donnchadh Ó Corráin concluded that: Orosius, author of Historiarum Adversum Paganos Libri vii, was a Briton, born at latest c. AD 375. Taken by Irish raiders, he spent years (c. AD 400) as a captive, held by traders, on the south shore of the Shannon estuary. He escaped and probably reached Galicia before AD 405. Ordained priest, he served at Bracara (now Braga in Portugal). He corresponded with St Augustine and moved to Hippo in AD 414. Sent to the East by Augustine, he played an undistinguished role at the councils of Jerusalem and Diospolis (AD 415). He settled at Carthage, where he wrote his main work, originally at the instigation of Augustine. He disappears after a voyage to the Balearic Islands. His is the first textual witness to Christianity in Ireland, observed c. AD 400, written up in AD 416–17. Birthplace[edit] Panorama of present-day Braga, the most likely birthplace for Orosius.[2] The subject of his birthplace is still disputed although a broad consensus has now been reached.[2] Basically there are four theories regarding his birthplace, that can be summarised as follows: Born in Braga: this idea is most widely accepted as it has the most evidence supporting it. If he was not born in Braga, it is likely he was born in the area around the town. This idea is supported by Orosius's own works and two letters written by Saint Augustine, the 166th and the 169th.[2] Born in Tarragona: this theory has been put forward because in his Histories Orosius talks of "Tarraconem nostra" (our Tarragona). The 19th-century author Teodoro de Mörner[11] held this opinion, but nowadays it does not seem reasonable to support the idea solely based on one indication.[12] Originated in A Coruña (Brigantia): this is a relatively new theory solely based on the fact that Orosius twice mentioned it in the geographical section of his Histories. Originated in Brittany: like the previous theory the supporting data for this theory rests on the fact that Orosius had some knowledge of this area.[13] Date of birth[edit] Lastly, his supposed date of birth varies between sources, however, a likely date has now been calculated. It is known for certain that in 415 Saint Augustine referred to Paulus Orosius as "a young priest", which means that at that time he could not have been older than 40, as he was young, and he had to be older than 30, as he was a priest.[14] Therefore, his date of birth can be fixed as being between 375 and 385, although the most widely accepted date is considered to be 383. This assumes that when Orosius met Saint Augustine he was 32 years old, that is, he had been an ordained priest for two years.[10] Biography[edit] Early life[edit] Despite the scarcity of sources, if his date of birth is accepted as that given above or at least within the window between 375 and 385 it can be seen that Orosius grew up during a period of cultural flourishing along with Hydatius and the Ávitos.[15] Priscillianism was an important doctrine at this time and it is considered likely that after entering the priesthood he took an interest in the Priscillianist controversy, which was being widely debated in his native country.[16] The classical theories suggest that Orosius belonged to a family with good social standing,[17] which would have allowed him to gain a good education. This would have developed along Christian lines, although assuming that Orosius was born in Braga, he would also have had a good knowledge of the rural culture of that time. Contemporary histories indicate that from an early age Orosius was loquacious and erudite,[18] alluding to statements to this effect made by both Saint Augustine and Pope Gelasius I. In any case, any discussion of Orosius's youth is pure speculation and conjecture because, as discussed above, there is little knowledge regarding this period of his life. Journey to Africa[edit] Schematic map showing all the journeys made by Paulus Orosius.[19] It is thought that Paulus Orosius lived in Gallaecia (northwest Hispania) until 409, but after that time and up until 415, there is no concrete information regarding his life. The traditional chronology, or at least the most widespread,[20] proposes the succession of events outlined in the following paragraphs. It appears that Orosius had to leave Braga as a result of the barbarian invasions of the Roman Empire. The date of his departure is in some doubt, however, what is known for certain is that he had to leave suddenly. This is even confirmed by Orosius himself who states that he was pursued onto the beach from which he set sail.[21] A number of dates have been suggested for his departure from Braga, ranging from 409 to 414, however, the best option is to stick with the two most widely accepted dates: 410: proposed by G. Fainck. This date means that Orosius had a window of 5 years for his collaboration with Saint Augustine before he travelled to Palestine. 414: which is the most widely accepted. In his book Commonitorium, which was published in 414, Orosius talks of his arrival, his meeting with Saint Augustine etc. What is certain is that once Orosius had left the Iberian Peninsula he was certain that his destination was Hippo (now Annaba in Algeria), and a meeting with Saint Augustine, who was the greatest thinker of his time. From his arrival Orosius formed part of a team that worked alongside Saint Augustine. It is therefore possible that Orosius collaborated in the writing of The City of God or at the least that he was aware of the book.[3] In 415 Saint Augustine entrusted Orosius with the task of travelling to Palestine to meet with the thinker Saint Jerome who at that time was living in Bethlehem. This indicates that Saint Augustine had a great deal of faith in Orosius as relations between Saint Augustine and Saint Jerome had not always been good. Journeys to Palestine[edit] The visit to Palestine had a double purpose: Orosius wanted to discuss a number of theological topics with Saint Jerome, particularly those relating to the soul's origins, and Saint Augustine wanted closer ties with the thinker and to gather information regarding the Priscillianists, Origenists and the Pelagian heresy.[22] In reality, it would seem that Orosius's main task was to assist Jerome and others against Pelagius, who, after the synod of Carthage in 411, had been living in Palestine, and finding some acceptance there. Orosius met with Pelagius on Saint Augustine's behalf and he represented the orthodox party against the Pelagians at the Synod of Jerusalem[23] that was held in June 415. At the synod Orosius communicated the decisions of the synod of Carthage and read several of Augustine's writings against Pelagius. Success, however, was not achieved among Greeks who did not understand Latin, and whose sense of reverence was unfased by Pelagius's famous question, Et quis est mihi Augustinus? ("Who is Augustine to me?") Orosius succeeded only in obtaining John's consent to send letters and deputies to Pope Innocent I of Rome; and, after having waited long enough to learn the unfavourable decision of the Synod of Diospolis (Lydda) in December of the same year, he returned to North Africa, Orosius had a confrontation with the Archbishop of Jerusalem, John II at the synod, in which Orosius was accused of heresy in front of the entire conclave. As his defence Orosius wrote his second book Liber Apologeticus, in which he emphatically rejected the accusation.[24] Orosius's first act on meeting Saint Jerome was to hand him the correspondence that he had brought from Saint Augustine. This implies that the journey was always conceived of as a return journey as Orosius would have to deliver the letters from Saint Jerome back to Saint Augustine. In parallel to this, the relics of Saint Stephen were uncovered at the end of 415 and part of the find was given to Orosius in order that he could take it back to Braga.[25] This marks both the start of his return journey and, from our current perspective, a new epoch in Orosius's life that is lacking in sources of information for its study. Later years[edit] Given that Saint Stephen's relics were uncovered on 26 December 415, Orosius must have departed from Palestine after that date. Although his idea was to travel to Braga, he was forced to pass through Hippo as it is known that he delivered letters from Jerome to Saint Augustine, it is also generally agreed that he passed through Jerusalem and Alexandria, although it is not known if he visited the latter on his outward journey, on his return journey or on both occasions.[26] During his second stay in Hippo he had a long conversation with Saint Augustine during which he handed over the letters he was carrying from Jerome and informed Saint Augustine about the meetings he had had with Pelagius.[27] The idea for Orosius's great work, Historiae Adversus Paganos, was born during this reencounter with Saint Augustine. However, it is difficult to estimate an exact date for when the book was written and for when the book was finished. This has given rise to a number of theories regarding the writing of the book: The traditional theory states that the book was finished between 416 and 417.[28] Support for these dates comes from the fact that the Liber Apologeticus does not mention Orosius's work as a historian, and the prologue refers to Book XI of the City of God by Saint Augustine, which was not published until 416. In order to justify how Orosius managed to write seven books in such a short time it is argued that he could have written summaries that were later filled out. A recent theory, proposed by Casimiro Torres Rodríguez, states that Orosius briefly stayed in Stridon a second time while trying to return to Portugal, which he was unable to do and he wrote the book during a third stay in Stridon. This would explain why Orosius refers in the “Histories” to events that took place in Hispania in 417. A third, older, theory, posed by T. von Mörner and G. Fainck, says that Orosius undertook the work before he travelled to Palestine. In fact, this idea has recently been given a new lease of life by M. P. Annaud-Lindet, although with the proviso that Orosius wrote the book during his return journey from Palestine. Disappearance[edit] Very little information is available regarding the life of Paulus Orosius after the publication of his Histories. It is known that he was in Menorca where he used the remains of Saint Stephen in attempts to convert members of the Jewish community to Christianity, but the date of his death is not known. This lack of information regarding Orosius could be due to cooling of relations with Saint Augustine, who never makes any clear unambiguous references to Orosius's "Histories" once they have been published. Gennadius of Massilia considers that Orosius lived at least until the end of the Roman emperor Honorius’ reign, which lasted until 423. However, there is no news of Orosius after 417 and it seems unlikely that such an active author would go six years without publishing anything new.[4] There are other theories, from a sudden death to a range of legends that talk of Orosius's final arrival in Hispania and his founding of a monastery near to Cabo de Palos where he ended his days, although this latter idea now seems improbable.[4] His works[edit] Commonitorium and Liber Apologeticus[edit] The Commonitorium and the Histories are a response, at least in their origins, to the direct influence that Saint Augustine exercised over Orosius.[29] Although Paulus Orosius's most important book was the Historiae Adversus Paganos, his other two surviving books must also be taken into account: Commonitorium and Liber Apologeticus.[30] The full name of his first book is Consultatio sive commonitorium ad Augustinum de errore Priscillianistarum et Origenistarum (in English: Warnings and Reminders by Augustine Against the Errors of the Priscillians and the Origenists).[29] Its chronology is littered with the same grey areas as Orosius's biography. In principle it is a book intended for Saint Augustine and therefore it must have been written before Orosius arrived in Africa, between 409 and 414 as discussed above.[31] The second chronological limit is 415, which is traditionally considered to be the date when Augustine's book Liber ad Orosium contra Priscillianistas et Origenistas was published, in which Augustine replies to Orosius's Commonitorium.[32] The book is not only aimed at Saint Augustine but was also preceded by conversations with the saint.[33] It not only describes Orosius journey to Africa, but also summarises the beliefs of Priscillianism and Origenism, and it asks for Saint Augustine's advice regarding these theological issues, thereby exposing some of Orosius's theological doubts.[34] The full name of Orosius's second book is Liber apologeticus contra Pelagium de Arbitrii libertate.[35] It was published at the time of Orosius's participation in the Council of Jerusalem in 415.[36] The book is the result of a theological debate during which Archbishop John II accused Orosius of heresy due to his idea that man cannot remain free of sin, not even with the help of divine intervention.[36] In order to defend himself from these accusations Orosius wrote Liber Apologeticus, in which he describes his motives for participating in the synod, he was invited by Saint Jerome, and rejects the accusation of heresy made against him.[35] However, neither of these two books are of a historical nature, despite containing elements that help in the reconstruction of Orosius's life. Historiae Adversus Paganos[edit] Historiae adversus paganos, 1561 Page from a manuscript of Orosius's Histories held in Florence. Paulus Orosius's masterpiece is Historiae Adversus Paganos, the only history book that he wrote, which gives insight into the historiographical methodology of the Spanish priesthood. It is not possible to be certain as to when it was written as there is no single theory that is unanimously accepted by all historians. The most common estimate places the drafting of the book between 416 and 417.[28][37] Miguel Ángel Rábade Navarro offers a clear and concise definition on Orosius's history in one of his articles on the author. In this article Rábade calls the Histories a "universalist history with an apologetic and providentialist character, whose main aim is to compare a pagan past with a Christian present, through their followers, their actions and their geographical and temporal location".[5] Be this as it may, the book had a definite origin and a clear purpose. The book's origins were a response to Saint Augustine's express desire for a book that would complement his De Civitate Dei which is a history focused on the pagan races.[38] The date of the book is not our main focus here, what is more important is Orosius's objective in responding to Saint Augustine's request by writing a book aimed at proving that Rome’s decadence – Rome was sacked by Alaric I in 410 – had nothing at all to do with the fact that the Romans had relatively recently converted to Christianity.[39] In a more general way Orosius wanted to show that the world has improved since the introduction of Christianity rather than declined as others had argued. In response to those who pointed to contemporary disasters, he simply argues that previous disasters occurring before Christianity were much worse. The work, a universal history of the calamities that have happened to mankind was the first attempt to write the history of the world as a history of God guiding humanity. Throughout the seven books that comprise the history, Orosius introduces several new methods and he also uses others that pick up on the traditional methods of Graeco-Roman historiography.[40] Orosius never offers a negative image of the Pagans, in this way he is being true to the traditions of the Graeco-Roman historians of that time, who always tried to give a positive impression of their "enemies".[40] Historical methodology[edit] Universalism[edit] The Universalist nature of Orosius's work is perhaps its most notable aspect. In fact, despite the lack of agreement regarding all other aspects of Orosius's life, including his biography and his works, most experts agree on the universalist nature of this work, including classicists such as Marcelino Menéndez y Pelayo and even more modern historians such as Torres Rodríguez.[41] In addition, his works are not only identified as universalist but as the first Christian universalist history, or put another way, the last classical universalist history.[42] Paulus Orosius is not only a widely studied author he also described his own thoughts on his historical methodology in some of the prologues to the volumes that comprise his “Histories”. He was always clear in his objectives, he wanted to write the history starting with the creation and leading up to the times in which he lived, which is a clear declaration of his universalist intentions as a historian.[43] Orosius uses the so-called "succession of the four world empires theory" throughout his works,[44] which traced world history based on the premise that out of the ruins of one great civilization another arose. Therefore, his theory was based on four historical empires, Babylonia, pagan Rome, Macedonia and Carthage, with a fifth empire, that of Christian Rome as the inheritor of all these.[45] In fact, during the narration of their histories the four empires develop in the same way and there are a number of striking parallels between them that are markedly different from Rome, which Orosius praises.[5] Orosius's basic innovation in dealing with the four empires theory was to introduce Carthage between Macedonia and Rome, which is something that scholars such as García Fernández point out as one of Orosius's defining and definitive acts.[39] Patriotism and universalism[edit] Another important characteristic of Orosius's “Histories” is defined as patriotism.[46] There are two clearly defined positions regarding Orosius's patriotism, a more traditional view espoused by Torres Rodríguez and a more novel view as recently outlined by García Fernández. Torres Rodríguez’ theory refers to patriotism is the sense that Orosius places special emphasis on the events that took place in Hispania. This is normal given Orosius's origins, but it can be thought of not only as patriotism but also as Hispanism.[46] Examples of this tendency include narratives of events in the “Histories”, that occurred in Braga or the fact that Orosius himself was charged with transporting the reliquaries of Saint Stephen.[47] It is even pointed out that Orosius's narrations are sometimes used by current day groups of Galician nationalists.[47] On the other hand, in 2005 García Fernández made an explicit allusion to Torres Rodríguez’ theory when he stated that it was an exaggeration to characterize Orosius's historical methodology as “patriotic”.[48] This was a rejection of nearly all of the statements made by Torres Rodríguez on this matter.[49] García Fernández used the idea of “localism”, which was a fashionable idea amongst historians at the beginning of the 21st century.[50] This idea argues that beyond "Hispanism” Orosius shows a “benevolent attitude” to Hispania.[50] Optimism and pessimism[edit] Another interesting point is the pessimism with which Orosius deals with certain themes and the exaggerated optimism with which he refers to others. In general he is pessimistic about anything to do with paganism or the past and optimistic regarding Christianity and his present, which is remarkable given the difficult times that he was living in.[51] These characteristics infuse all the others, it is particularly noticeable in his narration when he places a special emphasis on the suffering of the defeated,[52] and the terrors of war.[53] This characteristic can clearly be attributed to the influence of Saint Augustine, as Orosius is showing us the two sides of a coin in the purest style of Augustinian dualism.[54] Orosius is thereby able to present the past as a series of adversities with concrete examples, from Noah's flood to the shipwrecking of ships in the Mediterranean Sea, and the future as something positive despite the reality of the times in which he lived.[54] In order to follow a narrative of suffering and tragedy he often concentrated on defeats, which was different from the usual Roman historiography which normally gave pre-eminence to victories.[52] However, from a historiographical point of view this approach led to some inconsistencies, as, in order to bring the reader round to his point of view, Orosius sometimes described myths and legends as if they were historic fact.[55] Another traditional criticism of Orosius's work relates to this dichotomy of pessimism/optimism, which often causes him to offer a narrative that in many ways lacks an objective viewpoint.[56] This divides historians into those that view him as biased and others that reject this criticism and justify his approach by saying that Orosius viewed history in the same way as Christians view life.[56] Put another way, his approach is justified as being founded in the author's Providentialist character.[5] Narrative[edit] The narrative ability of Orosius should also not be overlooked. The author had a clear objective: that the Christians be defended from the non-Christian Roman's accusations that the sacking of Rome in 410 was a reprimand because the Christians had forsaken the city's traditional pantheon of gods.[57] Orosius's narrative abilities in forwarding this argument therefore went beyond the pessimism/optimism duality that was discussed in the previous section. His basic idea is that the past is always worse than the present, because it is always further from the true religion.[57] The fact that he had clear objectives ensured that he wrote his stories with a definite end in mind. Therefore, there are events that he narrated with little detail and others that he presents in full detail. Orosius never seems lacking in sources of information, he even affirms that an historian should be selective with those he has, it rather seems that this difference in level of detail reflects the emphasis that he wants to place on reinforcing his ideas.[53] The fact that his writing has a moral objective and apologist agenda means that he focuses on unusual events, such as the suffering of the general population during wartime.[43] This selection of facts, in large part, enables him to write about patriotism, for example, as he always pays a lot of attention to events in Hispania. The importance of geography[edit] Another important aspect of Orosius's work is the importance he placed on geography in his work as a historian.[58] This is shown in his geographic description of the world in the second chapter of the first of the seven books that comprise the Histories.[58] One failing of his geographical descriptions is his imprecision, such as, for instance, when he overuses the noun "Caucasus" to refer to other nearby ranges.[59] Despite this vagueness it is notable that the Histories include a chapter on geography. This has lent an increased value to his work in modern historiography, mainly thanks to authors such as Lucien Febvre and Fernand Braudel. Sources used by Orosius[edit] The sources Orosius used have been investigated by Teodoro de Mörner;[citation needed] besides the Old and New Testaments, he appears to have consulted Caesar, Livy, Justin, Tacitus, Suetonius, Florus and a cosmography, attaching also great value to Jerome's translation of the Chronicles of Eusebius. Impact of Orosius’s work[edit] Colophon from an incunabulum of the Historiae Adversus Paganos by Paulus Orosius, one of the most copied books from the Medieval period.[7] The assumed falling out of Paulus Orosius and Saint Augustine at the end of the former's life does not seem to have had a negative effect on the distribution and impact of his Histories.[60] Despite the previously highlighted criticisms of his work, Orosius's books were considered to be successes from virtually the day of their publication. His Histories was considered to be one of the main works of Spanish historiography right up until the time of the Reformation.[6] This success has, to a large extent, meant that his other works have also been conserved. Historiae Adversus Paganos has been quoted by all types of author from Saint Braulio of Zaragoza to Dante Alighieri. Even Lope de Vega made Orosius a central character in his play The Cardinal of Bethlehem, which shows how long-lived his fame was.[7] In fact, the book was not just widely quoted, it was one of the main scholastic books used by students of Ancient History throughout the Middle Ages.[7] Nearly two hundred manuscripts of the “Histories” have survived. An abridged, free translation into Old English, known as the Old English Orosius, once wrongly attributed to King Alfred, is still extant.[61] The Florentine Judge Bono Giamboni translated it into the Italian.[62] A still unpublished 14th century Aragonese translation, made by Domingo de García Martín at the request of Juan Fernández de Heredia, comes from Bono Giamboni's Italian translation. The “Histories” was also translated into Arabic as Kitāb Hurūshiyūsh, reputedly during the reign of al-Hakam II of Córdoba. It later became one of the sources of Ibn Khaldun in his history.[63]:136–53 The printed book has been widely copied and there are at least 82 surviving copies and 28 incunables from the first printed editions.[7] There are even copies still existing of editions in Italian and German from the 16th Century.[7] There are many 19th century versions of the book still in existence. In fact, a version of the book edited by Torres Rodríguez was used in compiling this article, although there are many equally valid versions in existence, both in Castilian Spanish and in other languages. See also[edit] Bobbio Orosius Notes[edit] ^ David Rohrbacher, "Orosius," in The Historians of Late Antiquity (Routledge, 2002), pp. 135–137. Rohrbacher bases the date of birth on Augustine's description of Orosius as a "young priest" and a "son by age" in the period 414–418, which would place his age at 30 or younger. Rohrbacher further speculates (p. 137) that Orosius may have died in a shipwreck while attempting to return to Hispania after visiting Palestine and Africa since nothing is heard of him after 418, which is also the likely date of completion of his last book. ^ a b c d Martínez Cavero, Pedro, “El pensamiento…”, p. 22. ^ a b Martínez Cavero, Pedro, “El pensamiento…”, p. 35. ^ a b c Martínez Cavero, Pedro, “El pensamiento…”, p. 57. ^ a b c d Rábade Navarro, Miguel Ángel, “Una interpretación...”, pp. 377. ^ a b Torres Rodríguez, Casimiro, “Paulo Orosio…”, p. 81. ^ a b c d e f Torres Rodríguez, Casimiro, “Paulo Orosio…”, p. 82. ^ a b Torres Rodríguez, Casimiro, “Paulo Orosio…”, p. 16. ^ a b Torres Rodríguez, Casimiro, “Paulo Orosio…”, p. 19. ^ a b Martínez Cavero, Pedro, “El pensamiento…”, p. 26. In this section he refers to the author M. P. Annaud-Lindet. ^ Theodor von Mörner was a 19th-century historian who wrote De Orosii Vita Eiusque Historiarum Libris Septem Adversus Paganos. [1] ^ Martínez Cavero, Pedro, “El pensamiento…”, p. 24. ^ Martínez Cavero, Pedro, “El pensamiento…”, p. 25. ^ Torres Rodríguez, Casimiro, “Paulo Orosio…”, p. 27. ^ Pedro Martínez Cavero refers to a discussion of this theme by J. E. López Pereira in his “Cultura y literatura latinas en el NO peninsular en la latinidad tardía”. ^ Rotelle, John E. (1990). The Works of Saint Augustine: A Translation for the 21st Century. New City Press. ISBN 9781565480384. ^ Pedro Martínez Cavero this time refers to author G. Fainck. ^ Both Martínez Cavero and Torres Rodríguez maintain this in books mentioned in the bibliography. ^ Drawn by the author from information contained in Martínez Cavero, Pedro, “El pensamiento…”, Torres Rodríguez, Casimiro, “Paulo Orosio…” and others. ^ Martínez Cavero, Pedro, “El pensamiento…”, p. 29. ^ Paulo Orosio, “Historias…”, III 20, 6-7, cited in turn by Martínez Cavero, Pedro, “El pensamiento…”, p. 30. ^ Martínez Cavero, Pedro, “El pensamiento…”, p. 39. ^ Merrills, A. H., History and Geography in Late Antiquity, Cambridge Studies in Medieval Life and Thought fourth Series, Cambridge University Press, Melbourne, 2005, p.39 ^ Martínez Cavero, Pedro, “El pensamiento…”, p. 42. ^ Martínez Cavero, Pedro, “El pensamiento…”, p. 43. ^ Martínez Cavero, Pedro, “El pensamiento…”, p. 45. ^ Martínez Cavero, Pedro, “El pensamiento…”, p. 47. ^ a b Martínez Cavero, Pedro, “El pensamiento…”, p. 52-53. ^ a b Beltrán Corbalán, Domingo and others, “El Commonitorium...”, p. 65. ^ Torres Rodríguez, Casimiro, “Paulo Orosio...”, p. 18. ^ Beltrán Corbalán, Domingo and others, “El Commonitorium...”, p. 66. ^ Beltrán Corbalán, Domingo and others, “El Commonitorium...”, p. 67. ^ Beltrán Corbalán, Domingo and others, “El Commonitorium...”, p. 69. ^ Beltrán Corbalán, Domingo and others, “El Commonitorium...”, p. 71. ^ a b Torres Rodríguez, Casimiro, “Paulo Orosio...”, p. 36. ^ a b Torres Rodríguez, Casimiro, “Paulo Orosio...”, p. 35. ^ More detailed information regarding the various theories regarding the date of writing can be found in the sections “Final years” and “Disappearance” of this article. ^ Alonso Ñúñez, José Miguel, “La metodología...”, p. 375. ^ a b García Fernández, Francisco José, “La imagen de Hispania...”, p. 287. ^ a b García Fernández, Francisco José, “La imagen de Hispania...”, p. 286. ^ Torres Rodríguez, Casimiro, “Paulo Orosio…”, p. 75. ^ Alonso Ñúñez, José Miguel, “La metodología…”, p. 373. ^ a b Alonso Ñúñez, José Miguel, “La metodología…”, p. 379. ^ Rábade Navarro, Miguel Ángel, “Una interpretación…”, pp. 378. ^ Rábade Navarro, Miguel Ángel, “Una interpretación…”, pp. 381. ^ a b Torres Rodríguez, Casimiro, “Paulo Orosio…”, p. 76. ^ a b Torres Rodríguez, Casimiro, “Paulo Orosius…”, p. 77. ^ García Fernández, Francisco José, “La imagen de Hispania…”, p. 293. ^ García Fernández, Francisco José, “La imagen de Hispania…”, p. 294. ^ a b García Fernández, Francisco José, “La imagen de Hispania…”, p. 298. ^ Torres Rodríguez, Casimiro, “Paulo Orosio…”, p. 63. ^ a b Torres Rodríguez, Casimiro, “Paulo Orosio…”, p. 65. ^ a b Alonso Ñúñez, José Miguel, “La metodología…”, p. 377. ^ a b Torres Rodríguez, Casimiro, “Paulo Orosio…”, p. 64. ^ Torres Rodríguez, Casimiro, “Paulo Orosio…”, p. 66. ^ a b Torres Rodríguez, Casimiro, “Paulo Orosio…”, p. 68. ^ a b Alonso Ñúñez, José Miguel, “La metodología…”, p. 376. ^ a b Torres Rodríguez, Casimiro, “Paulo Orosio…”, p. 53. ^ Torres Rodríguez, Casimiro, “Paulo Orosio…”, p. 56. ^ Torres Rodríguez, Casimiro, “Paulo Orosio…”, p. 80. ^ Old English text, with original in Latin, edited by H. Sweet, 1883. ^ ed. Tassi, Firenze 1849; partial editions are available in Cesare Segre’s, Volgarizzamenti del Due e del Trecento, Torino 1953 and in Cesare Segre’s, La prosa del Duecento, Milano-Napoli 1959) ^ Ann Christys, Christians in al-Andalus (711-1000) (Abingdon: Routledge, 2002), ISBN 0700715649.  This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Orosius, Paulus". Encyclopædia Britannica. 20 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 327. References[edit] Spanish Wikipedia has a bibliographic annex at: Anexo:Bibliografía sobre Paulo Orosio. Books by Paulus Orosius Orose: Histoires contre les païens, ed. Marie-Pierre Arnaud-Lindet, 3 vols. Collection des Universités de France, Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1990–1991. Pauli Orosii historiarum adversum paganos libri VII; accedit eiusdem, Liber apologeticus, ed. K. Zangemeister. Corpus Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum Latinorum 5, Vienna, 1882. Historiarum adversum paganos libri VII, ed. K. Zangemeister. Leipzig: Teubner, 1889. Pacian of Barcelona, Orosius of Braga, in Iberian Fathers: v. 3, The Catholic University of America Press, 1999; ISBN 978-0813200996 Orosius (1964). The Seven Books of History Against the Pagans. Translated by Roy J. Deferrari. Washington DC: Catholic University of America Press. OCLC 711212. Orosius, Seven Books of History Against the Pagans, trans. by A. T. Fear. Liverpool University Press, 2010 ISBN 978-1846312397 Orosius, Seven Books of History Against the Pagans, trans. Irving W. Raymond. New York: Columbia University Press, 1936. Publications on Orosius in English Linstädter, Marc-Antoine, Paulus Orosius - a Christian propagandist?, GRIN Verlag, 2013; ISBN 978-3638832410 Van Nuffelen, P., Orosius and the Rhetoric of History (Oxford Early Christian Studies), OUP Oxford 2012; ISBN 978-0199655274 Ó Corráin, Donnchadh, "Orosius, Ireland, and Christianity", Peritia 28, 2017 https://www.brepolsonline.net/doi/pdf/10.1484/J.PERIT.5.114565?download=true Publications on Orosius in Spanish Alonso Nuñez, José Miguel, “La metodología histórica de Paulo Orosio”, en Helmántica Nº 136–138, 1994, pp. 373–379. Beltrán Corbalán, Domingo, González Fernández, Rafael y Martínez Cavero, Pedro, “El Commonitorium de Orosio: traducción y comentario”, en Faventia: Revista de filología clàssica Nº 21, 1999, pp. 65.83. The complete text (in Spanish) from the article can be found on https://ddd.uab.cat/record/571. Consulted in October 2008. Fuentes De La Rosa, María Luisa, Orosio y su tiempo, 1st Edition, Madrid: Editorial de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 1990. García Fernández, Francisco José, “La imagen de Hispania y los hispanos a finales de la Antigüedad. Las Historiae Adversum Paganos de Paulo Orosio”, en Conimbriga Nº44, 2005, pp. 281–299. Mertínez Cavero, Pedro, El pensamiento histórico y antropológico de Orosio, 1st Edition, Murcia: Universidad. Área de Historia Antigua, 2002. Rábe Navarro Miguel Ángel, “Una interpretación de fuentes y métodos en la Historia de Paulo Orosio”, en Tabona. Revista de Prehistoria, Arqueología y Filología Clásicas Nº32, 1985–1987, pp. 377–393. Torres Rodríguez, Casimiro, Paulo Orosio. Su vida y sus obras, 1st Edition, La Coruña: Fundación Pedro Barrie de la Maza Conde de Fenosa, 1985. External links[edit] Orosius's Historiarum Adversum Paganos Libri VII at Thelatinlibrary.com (in Latin) Orosius's Historiae Adversum Paganos at Attalus (Latin text and English translation) Orosius's History against the pagans (in English) Orosius as a source for Ibn Khaldun A collection of links on Orosius Opera Omnia by Migne Patrologia Latina with Analytical Indexes [2] v t e History of Catholic theology Key figures General History of the Catholic Church Timeline History of the papacy Papal primacy Ecumenical councils Catholic Bible Vulgate Biblical canon History of Christian theology Early Church Paul Clement of Rome First Epistle of Clement Didache Ignatius of Antioch Polycarp Epistle of Barnabas The Shepherd of Hermas Aristides of Athens Justin Martyr Epistle to Diognetus Irenaeus Montanism Tertullian Origen Antipope Novatian Cyprian Constantine to Pope Gregory I Eusebius Athanasius of Alexandria Arianism Pelagianism Nestorianism Monophysitism Ephrem the Syrian Hilary of Poitiers Cyril of Jerusalem Basil of Caesarea Gregory of Nazianzus Gregory of Nyssa Ambrose John Chrysostom Jerome Augustine of Hippo John Cassian Orosius Cyril of Alexandria Peter Chrysologus Pope Leo I Boethius Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite Pope Gregory I Early Middle Ages Isidore of Seville John Climacus Maximus the Confessor Monothelitism Ecthesis Bede John of Damascus Iconoclasm Transubstantiation dispute Predestination disputes Paulinus II of Aquileia Alcuin Benedict of Aniane Rabanus Maurus Paschasius Radbertus John Scotus Eriugena High Middle Ages Roscellinus Gregory of Narek Berengar of Tours Peter Damian Anselm of Canterbury Joachim of Fiore Peter Abelard Decretum Gratiani Bernard of Clairvaux Peter Lombard Anselm of Laon Hildegard of Bingen Hugh of Saint Victor Dominic de Guzmán Robert Grosseteste Francis of Assisi Anthony of Padua Beatrice of Nazareth Bonaventure Albertus Magnus Boetius of Dacia Henry of Ghent Thomas Aquinas Siger of Brabant Thomism Roger Bacon Mysticism and reforms Ramon Llull Duns Scotus Dante Alighieri William of Ockham Richard Rolle John of Ruusbroec Catherine of Siena Bridget of Sweden Meister Eckhart Johannes Tauler Walter Hilton The Cloud of Unknowing Heinrich Seuse Geert Groote Devotio Moderna Julian of Norwich Thomas à Kempis Nicholas of Cusa Marsilio Ficino Girolamo Savonarola Giovanni Pico della Mirandola Reformation Counter-Reformation Erasmus Thomas Cajetan Thomas More John Fisher Johann Eck Francisco de Vitoria Thomas of Villanova Ignatius of Loyola Francisco de Osuna John of Ávila Francis Xavier Teresa of Ávila Luis de León John of the Cross Peter Canisius Luis de Molina (Molinism) Robert Bellarmine Francisco Suárez Lawrence of Brindisi Francis de Sales Baroque period to French Revolution Tommaso Campanella Pierre de Bérulle Pierre Gassendi René Descartes Mary of Jesus of Ágreda António Vieira Jean-Jacques Olier Louis Thomassin Jacques-Bénigne Bossuet François Fénelon Cornelius Jansen (Jansenism) Blaise Pascal Nicolas Malebranche Giambattista Vico Alphonsus Liguori Louis de Montfort Maria Gaetana Agnesi Alfonso Muzzarelli Johann Michael Sailer Clement Mary Hofbauer Bruno Lanteri 19th century Joseph Görres Felicité de Lamennais Luigi Taparelli Antonio Rosmini Ignaz von Döllinger John Henry Newman Henri Lacordaire Jaime Balmes Gaetano Sanseverino Giovanni Maria Cornoldi Wilhelm Emmanuel Freiherr von Ketteler Giuseppe Pecci Joseph Hergenröther Tommaso Maria Zigliara Matthias Joseph Scheeben Émile Boutroux Modernism Neo-Scholasticism Léon Bloy Désiré-Joseph Mercier Friedrich von Hügel Vladimir Solovyov Marie-Joseph Lagrange George Tyrrell Maurice Blondel Thérèse of Lisieux 20th century G. K. Chesterton Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange Joseph Maréchal Pierre Teilhard de Chardin Jacques Maritain Étienne Gilson Ronald Knox Dietrich von Hildebrand Gabriel Marcel Marie-Dominique Chenu Romano Guardini Edith Stein Fulton Sheen Henri de Lubac Daniel-Rops Jean Guitton Josemaría Escrivá Nouvelle théologie Karl Rahner Yves Congar Bernard Lonergan Emmanuel Mounier Jean Daniélou Hans Urs von Balthasar Alfred Delp Thomas Merton René Girard Johann Baptist Metz Jean Vanier Henri Nouwen 21st century Carlo Maria Martini Pope Benedict XVI Walter Kasper Raniero Cantalamessa Michał Heller Peter Kreeft Jean-Luc Marion Tomáš Halík Scott Hahn  Catholicism portal Authority control BIBSYS: 90104174 BNE: XX978431 BNF: cb11993007v (data) CANTIC: a10717912 CiNii: DA00510153 GND: 118590251 ICCU: IT\ICCU\RAVV\051992 ISNI: 0000 0001 2117 8754 LCCN: n50002187 LNB: 000031355 NKC: jn19981001916 NLI: 000101901 NSK: 000692620 NTA: 071115129 RERO: 02-A000126079 SNAC: w63796x5 SUDOC: 028008081 Trove: 939745 VcBA: 495/5295 VIAF: 2479624 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n50002187 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Orosius&oldid=992360064" Categories: 385 births 420 deaths People from Braga Sources on Germanic paganism 5th-century Christians 5th-century historians Christian writers Historians of the Catholic Church 5th-century Christian clergy 5th-century Christian theologians Christianization Romans from Hispania 5th-century Latin writers Hidden categories: Articles with hCards Articles containing Latin-language text Articles containing explicitly cited English-language text All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from November 2015 Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica with Wikisource reference Wikipedia articles incorporating text from the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CANTIC identifiers Wikipedia articles with CINII identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ICCU identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with LNB identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLI identifiers Wikipedia articles with NSK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with RERO identifiers Wikipedia articles with SNAC-ID identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with Trove identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Use dmy dates from March 2017 Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikisource Languages Ænglisc Asturianu Български Brezhoneg Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français Frysk Galego Հայերեն Hrvatski Bahasa Indonesia Italiano עברית ქართული Latina Magyar مصرى Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Polski Português Română Русский Shqip Slovenčina Slovenščina Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Українська 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 4 December 2020, at 21:22 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1233 ---- View source for Horace - Wikipedia View source for Horace ← Horace Jump to navigation Jump to search You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons: Your IP address is in a range that has been blocked on all Wikimedia Foundation wikis. The block was made by Jon Kolbert (meta.wikimedia.org). The reason given is Open Proxy: Webhost: Contact stewards if you are affected . Start of block: 20:12, 23 July 2019 Expiry of block: 20:12, 23 January 2022 Your current IP address is 40.76.139.33 and the blocked range is 40.76.0.0/16. Please include all above details in any queries you make. If you believe you were blocked by mistake, you can find additional information and instructions in the No open proxies global policy. Otherwise, to discuss the block please post a request for review on Meta-Wiki or send an email to the stewards OTRS queue at stewards@wikimedia.org including all above details. You are currently unable to edit Wikipedia due to a block affecting your IP address. This does not affect your ability to read Wikipedia pages. Most people who see this message have done nothing wrong. Some kinds of blocks restrict editing from specific service providers or telecom companies in response to recent abuse or vandalism, and affect other users who are unrelated to that abuse. See below if you do not believe you have done anything wrong. Editing from 40.76.0.0/16 has been blocked (disabled) by ‪SQL‬ for the following reason(s): The IP address that you are currently using has been blocked because it is believed to be a web host provider or colocation provider. To prevent abuse, web hosts and colocation providers may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You will not be able to edit Wikipedia using a web host or colocation provider because it hides your IP address, much like a proxy or VPN. We recommend that you attempt to use another connection to edit. For example, if you use a proxy or VPN to connect to the internet, turn it off when editing Wikipedia. If you edit using a mobile connection, try using a Wi-Fi connection, and vice versa. If you have a Wikipedia account, please log in. If you do not have any other way to edit Wikipedia, you will need to request an IP block exemption. If you are confident that you are not using a web host, you may appeal this block by adding the following text on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is _______. Place any further information here. ~~~~}}. You must fill in the blank with your IP address for this block to be investigated. Your IP address can be determined here. Alternatively, if you wish to keep your IP address private you can use the unblock ticket request system. There are several reasons you might be editing using the IP address of a web host or colocation provider (such as if you are using VPN software or a business network); please use this method of appeal only if you think your IP address is in fact not a web host or colocation provider. Administrators: The IP block exemption user right should only be applied to allow users to edit using web host in exceptional circumstances, and requests should usually be directed to the functionaries team via email. If you intend to give the IPBE user right, a CheckUser needs to take a look at the account. This can be requested most easily at SPI Quick Checkuser Requests. Unblocking an IP or IP range with this template is highly discouraged without at least contacting the blocking administrator. This block has been set to expire: 16:25, 2 June 2023. Even when blocked, you will usually still be able to edit your user talk page and email other editors and administrators. For information on how to proceed, first see the FAQ for blocked users and the guideline on block appeals. The guide to appealing blocks may also be helpful. Other useful links: Blocking policy · Help:I have been blocked You can view and copy the source of this page: == In popular culture == The Oxford Latin Course textbooks use the life of Horace to illustrate an average Roman's life in the [[Roman Republic|late Republic]] to [[Roman Empire|Early Empire]].{{Cite book|title=Oxford Latin Course Part one.|last=Balme, Maurice|first=Moorwood, James|publisher=Oxford University Press|year=1996|isbn=978-0195212037}} Return to Horace. Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horace" Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Page information Wikidata item Languages Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1236 ---- List of Roman laws - Wikipedia List of Roman laws From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Wikipedia list article This is a partial list of Roman laws. A Roman law (Latin: lex) is usually named for the sponsoring legislator and designated by the adjectival form of his gens name (nomen gentilicum), in the feminine form because the noun lex (plural leges) is of feminine grammatical gender. When a law is the initiative of the two consuls, it is given the name of both, with the nomen of the senior consul first. Sometimes a law is further specified by a short phrase describing the content of the law, to distinguish that law from others sponsored by members of the same gens. Contents 1 Roman laws 2 Post-Roman law codes based on Roman legislation 3 General denominations 4 Resolutions of the Senate 5 Other 6 See also 7 References 8 Bibliography 9 External links Roman laws[edit] Name Date Passed by Magistracy held Description Lex Acilia Calpurnia 67 BC C. Calpurnius Piso & M. Acilius Glabrio Consuls Permanent exclusion from office in cases of electoral corruption. Lex Acilia de intercalando 191 BC M. Acilius Glabrio Consul Adjustment of the calendar. Lex Acilia repetundarum 122 BC[1] M. Acilius Glabrio (& C. Sempronius Gracchus) Tribunes of the plebs Repetundae procedures for jurors in courts overseeing senatorial class to prevent corruption abroad. Lex Aebutia de formulis 120–63 BC (circa) Aebutius[2] Tribune of the plebs (?) Authorized praetor's discretion to be introduced into the court of the praetor urbanus, praetor able to remodel private law of Rome. Lex Aebutia de magistratibus extraordinariis 120–63 BC (circa) Aebutius[2] Tribune of the plebs? Proposer of extraordinary magistracy cannot hold it. Lex Aelia et Fufia 150 BC (circa)? Aelius & Fufius[3] Tribunes of the plebs? Two laws probably regulating auspices. Lex Aelia Sentia 4 AD Sex. Aelius Catus & C. Sentius Saturninus Consuls Manumissions of slaves. Lex Aemilia de censoribus 434 BC Mam. Aemilius Mamercinus Dictator Reduced the terms of censors to a year and a half. Lex Ampia 63 BC T. Ampius Balbus[4] Tribune of the plebs Allowed Pompey to wear the crown of bay at the Ludi Circenses. Lex Antonia de Termessibus 68 BC C. Antonius Hybrida[5] Tribune of the plebs Alliance with Termessus. Lex Antonia 44 BC Mark Antony Consul Measures of Mark Antony against dictatorship etc. Lex Appuleia agraria 103–100 BC Saturninus Tribune of the plebs Made provision for public lands taken in Cisalpine Gaul from the Cimbri to be allocated to poor citizens. Lex Appuleia de maiestate 103–100 BC Saturninus Tribune of the plebs Established an equestrian court to try maiestas. Lex Aquilia de damno 286 BC (possibly) Aquilius Tribune of the plebs Provided compensation to the owners of property injured by someone's fault. Lex Aternia Tarpeia 454 BC A. Aternius Varus & S. Tarpeius Montanus Capitolinus Consuls Allowed magistrates to fine citizens, but set maximum fines. Lex Atilia Marcia 311 BC L. Atilius & C. Marcius Rutilus Censorinus Tribunes of the plebs Empowered the people to elect sixteen military tribunes for each of four legions. Lex Atinia de tribunis plebis in senatum legendis 149 BC[6] Atinius Tribune of the plebs Allowed Plebeian Tribunes to be automatically enrolled in the senate upon election. Lex Atinia de usucapione 149 BC Atinius Tribune of the plebs Dealing with ownership. Lex Aufeia 123 BC Aufeius Tribune of the plebs Settlement of Asia. Lex Aufidia de ambitu 61 BC M. Aufidius Lurco Tribune of the plebs If a candidate promised money to a tribe and did not pay it, he should be unpunished; but if he did pay the money, he should further pay to each tribe (annually?) 3000 sesterces as long as he lived. Lex Aurelia de tribunicia potestate 75 BC C. Aurelius Cotta Consul Former tribunes of the plebs can hold further magistracies (this right had been removed by Sulla). Lex Aurelia iudiciaria 70 BC L. Aurelius Cotta Praetor Juries should be chosen from senators, equites and tribuni aerarii. Lex Baebia de Praetoribus 181 BC M. Baebius Tamphilus Consul Set number of praetors to alternate, but was never observed. Lex Cornelia et Baebia de Ambitu 181 BC P. Cornelius Cethegus & M. Baebius Tamphilus Consuls Against electoral bribery. Lex Caecilia de censoria 52 BC Q. Caecilius Metellus Pius Scipio Consul Repealed the lex Clodia de Censoribus passed by the tribune of the plebs Clodius in 58 BC, which had regulated the Censors. Lex Caecilia de vectigalibus 60 BC Q. Caecilius Metellus Nepos Iunior Praetor Released lands and harbors in Italy from the payment of taxes. Lex Caecilia Didia 98 BC Q. Caecilius Metellus Nepos & T. Didius Consuls Required laws to proposed at least three market days before any vote. Also forbade Omnibus bills, which are bills with a large amount of unrelated material. Lex Calpurnia 149 BC L. Calpurnius Piso Tribune of the plebs Established a permanent extortion court. Lex Canuleia 445 BC C. Canuleius Tribune of the plebs Allowed patricians and plebeians to intermarry. Lex Cassia tabellaria 137 BC L. Cassius Longinus Ravilla Tribune of the plebs Introduced secret votes in court jury decisions. Lex Cassia de senatu 104 BC L. Cassius Longinus Tribune of the plebs Required any senator to be expelled from the senate if they had been convicted of a crime, or if their power (imperium) had been revoked while serving as a magistrate. Lex Cassia 44 BC L. Cassius Longinus Tribune of the plebs Allowed Julius Caesar to add new individuals to the patrician (aristocratic) class. Lex Cassia Terentia frumentaria 73 BC C. Cassius Longinus & M. Terentius Varro Lucullus Consuls Required the distribution of corn among the poor citizens. Lex Cincia de donis et muneribus 204 BC M. Cincius Alimentus Tribune of the plebs Tort reform concerning the payment of lawyers. Lex citationis 426 AD Valentinian III Emperor During court proceedings, only five Roman lawyers could be cited. Lex Claudia 218 BC Q. Claudius Tribune of the plebs Prohibited senators from participating in overseas trade, obsolete by the time of Cicero. Lex Clodia 58 BC P. Clodius Pulcher Tribune of the plebs Seven laws: (1) Lex Clodia de Auspiciis: repealed the leges Aeliae et Fufiae. (2) Lex Clodia de Censoribus: prescribed certain rules for the Roman Censors in exercising their functions as inspectors of public morals. (3) Lex Clodia de Civibus Romanis Interemptis: threatened punishment for anyone who offered fire and water to those who had executed Roman citizens without a trial. (4) Lex Clodia Frumentaria: required the distribution of grain to Rome's poor citizens for free. (5) Lex Clodia de Sodalitatibus: declared that certain clubs of a "semi-political nature" (i.e. armed gangs) were lawful. (6) Lex Clodia de Libertinorum Suffragiis: attempted to extend freedmen's (i.e. ex-slaves') voting rights. (7) Lex Clodia de Rege Ptolemaeo et de exsulibus Byzantinis: pertained to several of Rome's eastern provinces and vassal states. Lex Cornelia annalis 81 BC Sulla Dictator A sanction law for Sulla's past acts; part of his program to strengthen the Senate. Lex Cornelia de maiestate 81 BC Sulla Dictator Treason law passed by Sulla to regulate the activities of pro-magistrates in their provinces, especially unapproved war and unauthorised travel. Lex Cornelia de sicariis et veneficiis 81 BC Sulla Dictator Dealing with injuries and deaths obtained by magic. Lex Domitia de sacerdotis 104 BC Cn. Domitius Ahenobarbus Tribune of the plebs Established the election of the pontifex maximus and the members of the college of priests (chosen by cooptation before). Lex Fufia Caninia 2 BC C. Fufius Geminus & L. Caninius Gallus Consuls Limited manumissions. Lex Gabinia 67 BC A. Gabinius Tribune of the plebs Pompey has special powers in the Mediterranean to fight against pirates Lex Gabinia tabellaria 139 BC A. Gabinius Tribune of the plebs Introduced secret votes in election for magistrate offices. Lex Gellia Cornelia 72 BC L. Gellius Publicola & Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Clodianus Consuls Authorised Pompey to confer Roman citizenship to his clientela and Spaniards. Lex Genucia 342 BC L. Genucius Tribune of the plebs Three laws: (1) Abolished interest on loans. (2) Required the election of at least one plebeian consul each year. (3) Prohibited a magistrate from holding two magistracies in the same year, or the same magistracy for the next ten years (until 332).[7][8][9] Lex Hadriana 117–138 AD Hadrian Emperor Enabled permanent tenants to develop land, it was an extension of the lex Manciana. Lex Hieronica 240 BC Hiero II King of Sicily Taxation of Sicily (the legislation of Hiero II was included in Roman law). Lex Hortensia 287 BC Q. Hortensius Dictator Plebiscites approved by the Assembly of the People gain the status of law. Lex de Imperio Vespasiani 69 AD Vespasian Emperor Conferring powers, privileges and exemptions to the emperor Vespasian. Lex Icilia de Aventino publicando 456 BC L. Icilius Tribune of the plebs Gave land to plebeians. Lex Iulia de Civitate Latinis et Sociis Danda 90 BC Lucius Julius Caesar Consul Offered citizenship to all Italians who had not raised arms against Rome in the Social War. Lex Iulia de adulteriis coercendis 17 BC Augustus Emperor Made conjugal unfaithfulness a public as well as a private offence, with banishment a possible penalty. Lex Iulia de Ambitu 18 BC Augustus Emperor Penalised bribery when acquiring political offices. Lex Iulia de maritandis ordinibus 18 BC Augustus Emperor Marrying-age celibates and young widows that would not marry were barred from receiving inheritances and from attending public games. Lex Iulia de repetundis 59 BC Julius Caesar Consul Regarding extortion in the provinces. Lex Iulia de vicesima hereditatum 5 AD Augustus Emperor Instituted a 5 percent tax on testamentary inheritances, exempting close relatives. Lex Iulia municipalis 45 BC Julius Caesar Dictator and consul Set regulations for the Italian municipalities. Lex Junia Licinia 62 BC D. Junius Silanus & L. Licinius Murena Consuls A reinforcement law passed to back up the earlier lex Caecilia Didia law of 98 BC. Lex Junia Norbana 19 AD M. Junius Silanus Torquatus & L. Norbanus Balbus Consuls Regarding status of freedmen. Lex Licinia Mucia 95 BC L. Licinius Crassus & Q. Mucius Scaevola Consuls Removed Latin and Italian allies from Rome's citizen-rolls. Lex Licinia Pompeia 55 BC Pompey and Crassus Consuls Caesar's proconsulship in both the Gauls was extended for another 5 years. lex Licinia Sextia 367 BC C. Licinius Stolo & L. Sextius Lateranus Tribunes of the plebs Four laws: (1) Lex de consule altero ex plebe et de praetore ex patribus creando: resumed the consulship and opened it to plebeians, and created the praetorship, reserved to patricians.[8] (2) Lex de aere alieno: provided that the interest already paid on debts should be deducted from the principal and that the payment of the rest of the principal should be in three equal annual instalments. (3) Lex de modo agrorum: restricted individual ownership of public land in excess of 500 iugeras (300 acres) and forbade the grazing of more than 100 cattle on public land. (4) Lex de Decemviri Sacris Faciundis: created the Decemviri sacris faciundis, a college of ten priests, of whom five had to be plebeians. Lex Maenia 279 BC Maenius[10] Tribune of the plebs Carried the principle of lex Pubilia to elections (approval of Senate moved before the elections, not after).. Lex Menenia Sestia 452 BC T. Menenius Lanatus & P. Sestius Capitolinus Vaticanus Consuls Scale for fines, 1 ox = 12 sheep = 100 lb. of bronze. Lex Manciana 69–96 AD Dealt with imperial and private cases in North Africa, regulated relations between cultivators and the proprietors. Lex Manilia 66 BC C. Manilius Tribune of the plebs Pompey's actions against Mithridates. Lex Minucia 216 BC M. Minucius Tribune of the plebs Appointment of three finance commissioners. Lex Ogulnia 300 BC Cn. & Q. Ogulnius Tribune of the plebs Created four plebeian pontiffs and five plebeian augurs. Lex Oppia 215 BC C. Oppius Tribune of the plebs Limited female adornment. Lex Ovinia 312 BC (before) Ovinius Tribune of the plebs Transferred the right to appoint Senators from the consuls to the censors. Lex Papia de peregrinis 65 BC C. Papius Tribune of the plebs Challenged false claims of citizenship and deported foreigners from Rome. Lex Papia Poppaea 9 AD M. Papius Mutilus & Q. Poppaeus Secundus Consuls Regarding marriage. Lex Papiria de dedicationibus 166–155 BC[11] Papirius Tribune of the plebs Forbade consecration of real property without approval of the popular assembly. Lex Papiria Julia 430 BC L. Papirius Crassus & L. Julius Iulus Consuls Made payment of fines in bronze mandatory. Lex de permutatione provinciae 44 BC Mark Antony Consul Gave himself a five-year command in Cisalpine and Transalpine Gaul in lieu of Macedon. Also gave authorization to transfer Caesar's legions from Macedon to the new provinces. Lex Petronia 32 BC (before)[12] Petronius Tribune of the plebs Regulated appointments of municipal prefects. Lex Plautia de reditu lepidanorum 70 BC Plautius Tribune of the plebs Granted a pardon to Lepidus' former associates. Lex Plautia Judiciaria 89 BC M. Plautius Silvanus Tribune of the plebs Chose jurors from other classes, not just the Equites. Lex Plautia Papiria 89 BC C. Papirius Carbo & M. Plautius Silvanus Tribunes of the plebs Granted citizenship to Roman allies. Lex Poetelia Papiria 326 BC C. Poetelius Libo & L. Papirius Cursor Consuls Abolished the contractual form of Nexum, or debt bondage. Lex Pompeia de Transpadanis 89 BC Cn. Pompeius Strabo Consul Granted Latin Right to the populations of Cisalpine Gaul. Lex de Porcia capita civium 199 BC P. Porcius Laeca Tribune of the plebs Gave right of appeal (provocatio) in capital cases. Lex Porcia de tergo civium 195 BC Cato the Elder Consul Extended the right to provocatio against flogging. Lex Porcia 185 BC L. Porcius Licinus Consul Provided for a very severe sanction (possibly death) against magistrates who refused to grant provocatio. Lex provincia 146 BC Set of laws designed to regulate and organize the administration of Roman provinces. Lex Publilia 471 BC Volero Publilius Tribune of the plebs Transferred the election of the tribunes of the plebs to the comitia tributa. Lex Publilia 339 BC Q. Publilius Philo Consul and dictator Three laws: (1) Reserved one censorship to plebeians. (2) Made plebiscites binding on all citizens (including patricians). (3) Stated that the Senate had to give its prior approval (the Auctoritas patrum) to plebiscites before becoming binding on all citizens (the lex Valeria Horatia of 449 had placed this approval after plebiscites). Lex Pupia 61 BC M. Pupius Piso Frugi Calpurnianus Consul Senate could not meet on Comitiales Dies. Lex Regia 759–509 BC Kings of Rome Laws enacted by the Roman kings before the Republic. Lex Roscia 49 BC L. Roscius Fabatus Praetor Caesar proposed full Latin Rights on the people of Transalpine Gaul. Lex Roscia theatralis 67 BC L. Roscius Otho Tribune of the plebs Allocated a place in Roman theaters to the equestrian order. Lex Rubria 122 BC C. Rubrius Tribune of the plebs Authorised a colony on the ruins of Carthage. Lex Sacrata 494 BC law after first secession of the plebeians that either affirmed the sacrosanctity of the tribunes or established the plebeians as a sworn confederacy against patricians. Lex Scantinia 149 BC (circa) M. Scantius or Scantinius[13] Tribune of the plebs Regulating some aspects of homosexual behaviour among citizens, primarily protecting freeborn male minors. Lex Sempronia agraria 133 BC Ti. Sempronius Gracchus Tribune of the plebs Set of laws that redistributed land among the poor; repealed after his assassination. Lex Servilia Caepio 106 BC Q. Servilius Caepio Consul Some control of the court de rebus repentundis was handed back to senators from the equites. Lex Servilia Glaucia de Repetundis 101 BC C. Servilius Glaucia[14] Tribune of the plebs Made juries in property court composed by equites only. Lex Terentia Cassia 73 BC M. Terentius Varro Lucullus & C. Cassius Longinus Consuls Safeguarded Rome's grain supply and distributed grain at reduced rates. Lex Titia 43 BC P. Titius Tribune of the plebs Gave Octavian, Mark Antony and Lepidus full powers to defeat the assassins of Julius Caesar; legalised the second triumvirate. Lex Trebonia 448 BC L. Trebonius Tribune of the plebs Forbade the cooptation of additional tribunes of the plebs to fill vacant positions. Lex Trebonia 55 BC C. Trebonius Tribune of the plebs Granted a five year proconsulship: in Syria to Crassus, in Spain to Pompey. Lex Tullia 63 BC Cicero Consul Regulated election fraud (see ambitus). Lex Ursonensis 44 BC Mark Antony Consul Foundation charter of the Caesarean colonia Iulia Genetiva. Lex Valeria 509, 449, & 300 BC P. Valerius Publicola Consul Granted every Roman citizen legal right to appeal against a capital sentence, defined and confirmed the right of appeal (provocatio). Lex Valeria 82 BC Lucius Valerius Flaccus Interrex Appointed Sulla dictator. Lex Valeria Cornelia 5 AD L. Valerius Messalla Volesus & Cn. Cornelius Cinna Magnus Consuls Regarding voting in the Comitia Centuriata. Lex Valeria Horatia 449 BC L. Valerius Potitus & M. Horatius Barbatus Consuls Three laws: (1) Lex Valeria Horatia de plebiscitis: established that the resolutions passed by the Plebeian Council were binding on all. (2) Lex Valeria Horatia de provocatione: granted the right to appeal to the People of any decision of magistrates. (3) Lex Valeria Horatia de tribunicia potestate: restored the potestas tribunicia, the powers of the plebeian tribunes. Lex Vatinia 59 BC P. Vatinius Tribune of the plebs Gave Julius Caesar governorship of Cisalpine Gaul and of Illyricum for five years. Lex Villia Annalis 180 BC L. Villius Annalis Tribune of the plebs Established minimum ages for the cursus honorum offices; determined an interval of two years between offices. Lex Visellia 24 CE Regulated the activities of freedmen Lex Voconia 169 BC Q. Voconius Saxa Tribune of the plebs Disallowed women from being the main heir to a dead man's estate, including cases where there were no male relatives alive. Post-Roman law codes based on Roman legislation[edit] lex Romana Burgundionum – one of the law tables for Romans after the fall of Western Roman Empire lex Romana Visigothorum (AD 506) – one of the law tables for Romans after the fall of Western Roman Empire General denominations[edit] lex agraria – A law regulating distribution of public lands lex annalis – qualifications for magistracies lex ambitus – Laws involving electoral bribery and corruption; see ambitus lex curiata – was any law passed by the comitia curiata, including the lex curiata de imperio; Roman adoptions, particularly so-called "testamentary adoptions," were also recognised by a lex curiata, famously in 59 BC when the patrician Clodius Pulcher was adopted into a plebeian gens in order to run for the office of tribune of the plebs. lex curiata de imperio – Law granting imperium to senior Roman magistrates under the Republic; it was the traditional basis for the later lex de Imperio allowing Imperial succession. Under the monarchy, it was also used to ratify the choice of a new king, and later confirmed Octavian's adoption as Caesar's son in 43 BC lex frumentaria – A law regulating price of grain lex sumptuaria – A law regulating the use of luxury items and public manifestations of wealth Resolutions of the Senate[edit] Senatus consultum – A Senate decree Senatus consultum ultimum or Senatus consultum de re publica defenda  – a late republic alternative to nominating a dictator Senatus consultum de Bacchanalibus (186 BC) – concerning the Bacchanalia Senatus consultum Claudianum (AD 52) – concerning slaves Senatus consultum Macedonianum – concerning loan/mutuum (time of Vespasian) Senatus consultum Neronianum (c. AD 100) – concerning legatum Senatus consultum Orphitianum (c. AD 200) – concerning inheritance Senatus consultum Pegasianum (c. AD 100) – concerning fideicommissum Senatus consultum Silanianum (AD 10) – concerning slaves Senatus consultum Tertullianum – concerning inheritance (time of Hadrian) Senatus consultum Vellaeanum (AD 46) – concerning intercedere Other[edit] Constitution of the Roman Republic – Set the separation of powers and checks and balances of the Roman Republic Acceptilatio – spoken statement of debt or obligation release Constitutio Antoniniana – granted citizenship to the Empire's freemen Corpus Iuris Civilis – codification by emperor Justinian Stipulatio – basic oral contract Twelve Tables – The first set of Roman laws published by the Decemviri in 451 BC, which would be the starting point of the elaborate Roman constitution. The twelve tables covered issues of civil, criminal and military law. Every Roman that went to school was supposed to know them by heart. See also[edit] Twelve Tables Constitution of the Roman Republic References[edit] ^ Broughton, vol. I, pp. 517, 519 (note 4). ^ a b Broughton, vol. II, p. 468. ^ Broughton, vol. I, pp. 452, 453. ^ Broughton, vol. II, p. 167. ^ Broughton, vol. II, pp. 138, 141 (note 8). ^ Broughton, vol. I, pp. 458, 459. ^ Livy, vii. 42. ^ a b Cornell, Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 7-2, p. 337. Cornell explains that Livy confused the contents of the Lex Licinia Sextia of 366 with the Lex Genucia of 342. ^ Brennan, The Praetorship, pp. 65-67, where he shows that the ten year rule was only temporary at this time. ^ Broughton, vol. I, pp. 193, 237. ^ W. Jeffrey Tatum, "The lex Papiria de Dedicationibus", in Classical Philology, Vol. 88, No. 4. (October 1993), pp. 319–328. The traditional date of 304 BC is incorrect. ^ Broughton, vol. II, p. 472. ^ Broughton, vol. I, pp. 459, 460 (note 3). ^ Broughton, vol. I, pp. 571, 572. Bibliography[edit] Brennan, T. Corey, The Praetorship in the Roman Republic, Oxford University Press, 2000. Walbank, F. W., et al., The Cambridge Ancient History, vol. VII, part 2, The Rise of Rome to 220 BC, Cambridge University Press (1989). External links[edit] The Roman Law Library, incl. Leges "Index of Roman Laws". v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Roman_laws&oldid=996507019" Categories: Roman law Ancient Rome-related lists Lists of legislation Hidden categories: Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages العربية Български Català Čeština Español Français Italiano Magyar Polski Português Română Русский Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Українська Edit links This page was last edited on 27 December 2020, at 00:49 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1238 ---- Social class in ancient Rome - Wikipedia Social class in ancient Rome From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Not to be confused with Status in Roman legal system. Example of higher class Roman men. Social class in ancient Rome was hierarchical, with multiple and overlapping social hierarchies. An individual's relative position in one might be higher or lower than in another, which complicated the social composition of Rome.[1] The status of freeborn Romans during the Republic was established by: Ancestry (patrician or plebeian); Census rank (ordo) based on wealth and political privilege, with the senatorial and equestrian ranks elevated above the ordinary citizen; Gender; and Citizenship, of which there were grades with varying rights and privileges. The different Roman classes allowed for different rights and privileges, including voting rights, marriage rights, and more. Contents 1 Patricians and plebeians 1.1 Patrician 1.2 Plebeians 2 Property-based classes 3 Gender-based classes 3.1 Pater Familias 3.2 Women 4 Slavery and freed men 4.1 Slaves 4.2 Freed men 5 Non-Roman citizens 5.1 Latin Right 5.1.1 Old Latin Rights 5.1.2 Latin Rights post-338 BC 5.2 Peregrini 6 References Patricians and plebeians[edit] Main articles: Patrician (ancient Rome) and Plebs Traditionally, patrician refers to members of the upper class, while plebeian refers to lower class.[2] Economic differentiation in Rome saw a small number of families accumulate most of the wealth in Rome, thus giving way to the creation of the patrician and plebeian classes.[2] After this initial distinction, however, the divide between patrician and plebeian families was strictly hereditary, based on social status.[2] The toga, shown here on a statue restored with the head of Nerva, was the distinctive garb of Roman male citizens. The plebeians comprised the majority of Roman citizens. Although patricians are often represented as rich and powerful families who managed to secure power over the less-fortunate plebeian families, plebeians and patricians among the senatorial class were often equally wealthy.[2] As civil rights for plebeians increased during the middle and late Roman Republic, many plebeian families had attained wealth and power while some traditionally patrician families had fallen into poverty and obscurity. Regardless of how rich a plebeian family became, they would not rise to be included in the ranks of the patricians.[2] By the second century BC, the divide between patricians and plebeians had lost most of its distinction and began to merge into one class.[3] Patrician[edit] Patricians were considered the upper-class in early Roman society. They controlled the best land and made up the majority of the Roman senate. It was rare—if not impossible—for a plebeian to be a senator until 444 BC.[2][page needed] A common type of social relation in ancient Rome was the clientela system that involved a patron and client(s) that performed services for one another and who were engaged in strong business-like relationships. Patricians were most often the patrons, and they would often have multiple plebeian clients.[2] Patrons provided many services to their clients in exchange for a promise of support if the patron went to war.[2] This patronage system was one of the class relations that most tightly bound Roman society together, while also protecting patrician social privileges.[2] Clientela continued into the late Roman society, spanning almost the entirety of the existence of ancient Rome.[2] Patricians also exclusively controlled the Censor, which controlled the census, appointed senators, and oversaw other aspects of social and political life. Through this office, patricians were able to maintain their hierarchy over the plebeians.[2] Plebeians[edit] Plebeians were the lower-class, often farmers, in Rome who mostly worked the land owned by the Patricians. Some plebeians owned small plots of land, but this was rare until the second century BC.[2] Plebeians were tied to patricians through the clientela system of patronage that saw plebeians assisting their patrician patrons in war, augmenting their social status, and raising dowries or ransoms.[2] In 450 BC, plebeians were barred from marrying patricians, but this law was repealed in 445 BC by a Tribune of the Plebs.[2][page needed] In 444 BC, the office of Military Tribune with Consular Powers was created, which enabled plebeians who passed through this office to serve in the Senate once their one-year term was completed.[2][page needed] Plebeians remained, for the most part, dependent on those of higher social class for the entirety of the existence of ancient Rome, through the clientela system or by other means attaching themselves to those with power if possible.[2][page needed] Property-based classes[edit] Further information: Roman Senate and Equites Roman society was also divided based on property in the Centuriate Assembly. The Centuriate Assembly was responsible for declaring war, for electing magistrates with imperium, and for trying select cases.[2] A statue of a member of the equestrian class from 176 CE. This statue is believed to be from the Capitoline Hill in Rome, and is the only equestrian statue that survives. Only Romans who were wealthy enough to afford their own armour were allowed to serve in the army, which consisted of both patricians and plebeians. As long as a citizen could afford armour, he was able to be a soldier.[2] The Centuriate Assembly was divided into groups based on how wealthy one was and one’s ability to provide his armour and weapons. Centuriate Assembly[2][4] Class Number of centuries/votes Census property Equipment Equestrians 18 Horse, full armour, various weapons Class I 80 100,000 As Full armour, some weapons Class II 20 75,000 As Almost full armour, some weapons Class III 20 50,000 As Some armour, few weapons Class IV 20 25,000 As Little armour, few weapons Class V 30 11,000 As No armour, single weapon Proletariate 5 None Total Centuries/Votes 193 The Equestrians and Class I held 98 votes between them, thus they could outvote the combined lower classes who only had 95 votes. This was a means for the wealthier classes to maintain control over the army and social life. Rather than risk the lower classes revolt because of their lack of influence in the Assembly, the votes were allocated to ensure that the higher classes could always outvote the lower ones.[2] Gender-based classes[edit] Pater Familias[edit] Roman society was patriarchal in the purest sense; the male head of household was the pater familias, he held special legal powers and privileges that gave him jurisdiction (patria potestas) over all the members of his familia.[2] Fathers were in charge of educating their sons. Additionally, adult sons would often marry and continue to live in the family household under their pater familias, until their father died and they took over the responsibility of pater familias.[2] The pater familias could also perform an emancipatio (emancipation) ritual - a process that set the son free, three times in a row - to grant the son his own legal authority, free from the pater familias.[2] A painting of Lucretia, the ideal Roman woman from the Roman tale, The Death of Lucretia. Women[edit] Free-born women in ancient Rome were citizens (cives), but could not vote or hold political office. Women were under exclusive control of their pater familias, which was either their father, husband, or sometimes their eldest brother.[2] Women, and their children, took on the social status of their pater familias. Women were not included in the political sphere, and they had little influence outside the home. However, women of wealthier families had more political power than poorer women as they were able to exert their influence behind the scenes of public, political actions.[5] There were three early forms of marriage that transferred Roman women from one pater familias to another. The first, coemptio, represented the purchase of the bride.[2][6] This oldest form of marriage required five witnesses and an official, and was treated as a business transaction.[6] The second, usus, occurred after one year of intimacy between a man and a woman.[6] If the woman did not leave the man for three nights following the year, she became the man's possession and he became her pater familias. If the woman left before the three nights were over, she would return to her family. The relationship would still be valid, but the man would not become her pater familias.[6] The last form of marriage, confarreatio, was the closest to modern marriage. Confarreatio was a religious ceremony that consisted of the bride and groom sharing bread in front of religious officials and other witnesses.[6] By the end of the second century CE, marriages sine manu were the standard form of marriage.[2] Through a marriage sine manu, women did not fall under the legal jurisdictions of their new husbands or their fathers. They controlled their own property (usually their dowry) after the death of their father.[2] Men still had to sign any paperwork on behalf of their women, but there were now two economic units in the marriage. Moreover, divorce could be initiated by either man or woman, often by saying "I divorce you" three times while in front of witnesses.[2] The legal status of a mother as a citizen affected her son's citizenship. The phrase ex duobus civibus Romanis natos (“children born of two Roman citizens”) indicates that a Roman woman was regarded as having citizen status, in specific contrast to a peregrina. Slavery and freed men[edit] Slaves[edit] Slaves (servi) were not citizens, and lacked even the legal standing accorded free-born foreigners. Slaves were seen as property, and they were bought and sold like any other good in Rome.[3] For the most part, slaves descended from debtors and from prisoners of war, especially women and children captured during sieges and other military campaigns in Greece, Italy, Spain, and Carthage. In the later years of the Republic and into the Empire, more slaves came from newly conquered areas of Gaul, Britain, North Africa, and Asia Minor.[3] Many slaves were created as the result of Rome's conquest of Greece, but Greek culture was considered in some respects superior to that of Rome: hence Horace's famous remark Graecia capta ferum victorem cepit ("Captured Greece took her savage conqueror captive"). The Roman playwright Terence is thought to have been brought to Rome as a slave. Thus slavery was regarded as a circumstance of birth, misfortune, or war; it was defined in terms of legal status, or rather the lack thereof, and was neither limited to or defined by ethnicity or race, nor regarded as an inescapably permanent condition. Slavery was more prominent in Roman antiquity than anywhere else in the ancient world, save for Greece.[7] Slaves who lacked skills or education performed agricultural or other forms of manual labor. More slaves were tasked with agricultural labour than any other form of work.[7] Those who were violent or disobedient, or who for whatever reason were considered a danger to society, might be sentenced to labor in the mines, where they suffered under inhumane conditions. Slave owners were allowed to return their slaves for their money back if they were found to be defective, or if the seller had concealed anything that would affect the slave's productivity.[3] Slaves that were found to be sick or defective would often be sold for very little, if anything.[3] Masters would occasionally manumit sick or elderly slaves as a way to save money if they would not fetch enough money from their sale because it was cheaper than feeding and housing a useless slave. Since slaves were legally property, they could be disposed of by their owners at any time. All children born to female slaves were slaves. Slaves who had the education or skills to earn a living were often manumitted upon the death of their owner as a condition of his will.[3] Slaves who conducted business for their masters were also permitted to earn and save money for themselves, and some might be able to buy their own freedom, while still others were granted their freedom by their owners - though this was rare.[3] Freed men[edit] Freed men (liberti) were freed slaves who, once freed, became full Roman citizens, however they were not considered equal to other citizens because of their former status as slaves or their descent from former slaves, thus they joined the ranks of the lower-class plebeians.[2] Only after a few generations would the descendants of former slaves be able to rise through the ranks of the classes (sometimes becoming equites or senators).[3] The status of liberti developed throughout the Republic as their number increased. Through their military service, and through other endeavours such as craftsmanship and business ventures, freed men often accumulated vast fortunes in the later Republic.[3] Despite the fortunes of these many liberti, throughout ancient Rome the majority of freed men were plebeians and worked as farmers or tradesmen.[3] Non-Roman citizens[edit] The Orator, c. 100 BC, an Etrusco-Roman bronze sculpture depicting Aule Metele (Latin: Aulus Metellus), an Etruscan man wearing a Roman toga while engaged in rhetoric; the statue features an inscription in the Etruscan alphabet Latin Right[edit] Latin Rights, or Jus Latii, are the rights given to Latin allies and Latin colonies of Rome.[8] Old Latin Rights[edit] Latin allies were given the right to intermarry, conduct business, and enter into contracts with full Roman citizens, and the right to move from an allied Latin city to Rome (or vice versa).[8] Children of full Roman citizens and Latin mothers could inherit the Roman property and citizenship of their fathers through the Latin League, before 338 BCE.[8] Those with Latin rights had a privileged status above other Roman allies who were not full Roman citizens.[9] Latin Rights post-338 BC[edit] The citizens of 5 Latin towns (Aricia, Lanuvium, Pedum, Nomentum, and Antium) were given full Roman citizenship in 338 BC, after the end of the Latin War. The rest of the Latin allies were given limited Roman citizenship, receiving the privileges of the Old Latin Rights, but not being granted the right to vote or obtain Roman property unless they relocated permanently to the city of Rome.[8] Peregrini[edit] Free-born foreign subjects were known as peregrini. Peregrini operated under the laws that were in effect in their provinces when they were captured by Rome.[10] Augustus (27 B.C..- 14 AD) instituted laws that allowed peregrini to become citizens through serving in the Roman army or on a city council. Citizen rights were inherited, so children of peregrini who had become citizens were also citizens upon birth.[10] Distinctions between Roman citizens and peregrini continued until 212 AD, when Caracalla (211 AD - 217 AD) extended full Roman citizenship to all free-born men in the empire[11] with the declaration of the Antonine Constitution.[10] References[edit] ^ Koenraad Verboven. (2007). The Associative Empire. Athenaeum 95, p. 861. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac Mathisen, Ralph (2019). Ancient Roman Civilization: History and Sources. Oxford University Press.[page needed] ^ a b c d e f g h i j Runciman, W. G. (1983). "Capitalism without Classes: The Case of Classical Rome". The British Journal of Sociology. 34 (2): 157–181. doi:10.2307/590734. ISSN 0007-1315. JSTOR 590734. ^ Polybius VI.19, 20; Livy I.43 ^ Milnor, Kristina (2009-09-24), The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Historians, Cambridge University Press, pp. 276–287, doi:10.1017/ccol9780521854535.018, ISBN 978-0-521-85453-5 Missing or empty |title= (help); |chapter= ignored (help) ^ a b c d e "Marriage and love life in ancient Rome « IMPERIUM ROMANUM". IMPERIUM ROMANUM. Retrieved 2020-03-26. ^ a b Wood, Ellen Meiksins (2002). "Landlords and Peasants, Masters and Slaves: Class Relations in Greek and Roman Antiquity". Historical Materialism. 10 (3): 17–69. doi:10.1163/15692060260289707 – via EBSCO. ^ a b c d Yeo, Cedric A. (1959). "The Founding and Function of Roman Colonies". The Classical World. 52 (4): 104–130. doi:10.2307/4344123. ISSN 0009-8418. JSTOR 4344123. ^ Richardson, J. S. (1980). "The Ownership of Roman Land: Tiberius Gracchus and the Italians". The Journal of Roman Studies. 70: 1–11. doi:10.2307/299552. ISSN 0075-4358. JSTOR 299552. ^ a b c Mathisen, Ralph W. (2006). "Peregrini, Barbari, and Cives Romani: Concepts of Citizenship and the Legal Identity of Barbarians in the Later Roman Empire". The American Historical Review. 111 (4): 1011–1040. doi:10.1086/ahr.111.4.1011. ISSN 0002-8762. JSTOR 10.1086/ahr.111.4.1011. ^ Lucrezi, Francesco (2016), Scarafile, Giovanni; Gruenpeter Gold, Leah (eds.), Paradoxes of Conflicts, Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, Springer International Publishing, 12, pp. 41–46, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-41978-7_4, ISBN 978-3-319-41978-7 Missing or empty |title= (help); |chapter= ignored (help) v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films v t e Social class Status Stratum Economic classes Theories Gilbert model Marxian Mudsill theory New class Spoon class theory Weberian (three-component) Related​ topics Caste Chattering classes Class conflict Class discrimination Classicide Classless society Class society Euthenics Nouveau riche / Parvenu Poverty Ranked society Snobbery Social cleansing Social exclusion Social mobility Social orphan Social position Social stigma Subaltern By demographic By status Administrative detainee Alien illegal immigrant refugee Citizen dual or multiple native-born naturalized second-class Convicted Migrant worker Political prisoner Stateless Clique Adolescent By "collar" Blue Green Grey New Pink White By type Ruling Aristocracy Hanseaten Patrician Political Royal family Intellectual Clergy Knowledge worker Professor Warrior Harii Kshatriya Yadav Nair Chhetri Cossacks Hashashin Knight Vanniyar Samurai Cuāuh Ocēlōtl Spartiate Upper Bourgeoisie Business magnate Elite Gentry Lord Nobility Old money Overclass Robber baron Russian oligarch Seigneur Superclass Creative Bohemians Middle Lower middle class Upper middle class Bourgeoisie Petite bourgeoisie Working Working poor Proletariat Lumpenproletariat Under Ant tribe Rat tribe Commoner Outcast Outlaw / Prisoner Peasant / Serf Plebeian Slave Untouchable By country or region United States Affluence American Dream Conflict History Mobility Classes Upper Black Donor Gentry Middle Black Mexican-American Upper Middle Underprivileged Lower Under Income Household Inequality Personal Poverty Standard of living Education Homelessness Home-ownership Wealth Other regions​ or countries Africa Cambodia China Colombia Ecuador France Haiti India Iran Italy Nepal New Zealand Romania Sri Lanka Tibet United Kingdom United States Historic Ancient Greece Ancient Rome Aztec Ottoman Empire Soviet Union Pre-industrial East Asia Pre-industrial Europe Category Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Social_class_in_ancient_Rome&oldid=996251770" Categories: Social class in ancient Rome Hidden categories: Wikipedia articles needing page number citations from May 2020 Pages with citations lacking titles CS1 errors: chapter ignored Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Català Français Հայերեն Bahasa Indonesia עברית Português Русский Українська Edit links This page was last edited on 25 December 2020, at 12:33 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1239 ---- Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Library - Wikipedia Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Library From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Wikipedia community project developing an open research hub for the Wikimedia community You may be looking for Wikipedia:WikiProject Libraries. Shortcuts WP:LIBRARY WP:LIB WP:TWL WP:WIKILIB The Wikipedia Library The Wikipedia Library is an open research hub, a place for active Wikipedia editors to gain access to the vital reliable sources that they need to do their work and to be supported in using those resources to improve the encyclopedia. We aim to make access and use of sources free, easy, collaborative, and efficient. Find sources[edit] Request access to sources: Get free access to otherwise paid or subscription resources via the Wikipedia Library Card Platform. Explore open access: Learn about freely available and licensed resources. Find or share a source: A resource sharing page where editors can request a source from other editors. Get involved[edit] Suggest a database: Point out resources missing from our current collections. Translate our platform: Make the interface available to other language communities. Read our newsletter: Read about and stay up to date on our recent and ongoing activities. Coordinate: Help manage and improve the library. Build a global branch: Support a Wikipedia Library in another language community. Partner with TWL[edit] Share open or digital collections: Make library/archival resources available online. Donate database access: Expand our offerings. Involve your university: Learn how to engage as a library. Engage as cultural professionals: Get involved with Wikipedia as a librarian, archivist, or curator. Learn more[edit] Ask a reference question: Get help with research. Learn Wikipedia research basics: Explore how to use Wikipedia to find information. Get in touch   email: wikipedialibrarywikimedia.org •   twitter: @wikilibrary •   facebook: The Wikipedia Library •   mailing list: Wikipedia-Library •   irc: #wikipedia-library The Wikipedia Library (talk | e) Apply for free access to research! Research tools and services Resource Exchange Reference Desk Research Desk Discover open access Free Resource Guides Book Sources Journal Sources Bibliographies Free newspaper sources Online archives Find Your Local Library tips Find Your Source tips How to find sources Citation tools guide Outreach The Wikipedia Library Bookshelf (meta) Universities and Libraries Archivists Publishers Wikipedia Loves Libraries Wikidata source metadata Get involved Get free access to sources Read the Books & Bytes newsletter Help disambiguate authors of scholarly papers Be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar Teach Library Interns Become a Coordinator Learn about TWL ...Support Open Access... Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:The_Wikipedia_Library&oldid=975802869" Categories: The Wikipedia Library Hidden categories: Project pages with short description Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Project page Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Meta-Wiki Languages العربية বাংলা Català Ελληνικά Español فارسی Français 한국어 हिन्दी Italiano עברית Kurdî Mirandés 日本語 Nordfriisk Norsk bokmål Polski Português Simple English سنڌي Suomi Türkçe Українська Tiếng Việt 文言 Yorùbá 粵語 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 30 August 2020, at 14:15 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1252 ---- Epicurus - Wikipedia Epicurus From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Ancient Greek philosopher Epicurus Roman marble bust of Epicurus Born February 341 BC Samos, Greece Died 270 BC (aged about 72) Athens, Greece Era Hellenistic philosophy Region Western philosophy School Epicureanism Main interests ethics epistemology physics theology Notable ideas aponia ataraxia atomic swerve "moving" and "static" pleasures[1] Attributed: Epicurean paradox Influences Democritus, Aristippus, Pyrrho, Nausiphanes Influenced Seneca the Younger, Hermarchus, Lucretius, Bentham, John Stuart Mill, Baruch Spinoza , Thomas Jefferson, Karl Marx, Metrodorus, David Hume, Philodemus, Gassendi Epicurus (Ancient Greek: Ἐπίκουρος, romanized: Epíkouros;[a] 341–270 BC) was an ancient Greek philosopher and sage who founded Epicureanism, a highly influential school of philosophy. He was born on the Greek island of Samos to Athenian parents. Influenced by Democritus, Aristippus, Pyrrho,[3] and possibly the Cynics, he turned against the Platonism of his day and established his own school, known as "the Garden", in Athens. Epicurus and his followers were known for eating simple meals and discussing a wide range of philosophical subjects. He openly allowed women to join the school as a matter of policy. Epicurus is said to have originally written over 300 works on various subjects, but the vast majority of these writings have been lost. Only three letters written by him—the letters to Menoeceus, Pythocles, and Herodotus—and two collections of quotes—the Principal Doctrines and the Vatican Sayings—have survived intact, along with a few fragments of his other writings. Most knowledge of his teachings comes from later authors, particularly the biographer Diogenes Laërtius, the Epicurean Roman poet Lucretius and the Epicurean philosopher Philodemus, and with hostile but largely accurate accounts by the Pyrrhonist philosopher Sextus Empiricus, and the Academic Skeptic and statesman Cicero. For Epicurus, the purpose of philosophy was to help people attain a happy, tranquil life characterized by ataraxia (peace and freedom from fear) and aponia (the absence of pain). He advocated that people were best able to pursue philosophy by living a self-sufficient life surrounded by friends. He taught that the root of all human neurosis is death denial and the tendency for human beings to assume that death will be horrific and painful, which he claimed causes unnecessary anxiety, selfish self-protective behaviors, and hypocrisy. According to Epicurus, death is the end of both the body and the soul and therefore should not be feared. Epicurus taught that although the gods exist, they have no involvement in human affairs. He taught that people should behave ethically not because the gods punish or reward people for their actions, but because amoral behavior will burden them with guilt and prevent them from attaining ataraxia. Like Aristotle, Epicurus was an empiricist, meaning he believed that the senses are the only reliable source of knowledge about the world. He derived much of his physics and cosmology from the earlier philosopher Democritus (c. 460–c. 370 BC). Like Democritus, Epicurus taught that the universe is infinite and eternal and that all matter is made up of extremely tiny, invisible particles known as atoms. All occurrences in the natural world are ultimately the result of atoms moving and interacting in empty space. Epicurus deviated from Democritus by proposing the idea of atomic "swerve", which holds that atoms may deviate from their expected course, thus permitting humans to possess free will in an otherwise deterministic universe. Though popular, Epicurean teachings were controversial from the beginning. Epicureanism reached the height of its popularity during the late years of the Roman Republic. It died out in late antiquity, subject to hostility from early Christianity. Throughout the Middle Ages Epicurus was popularly, though inaccurately, remembered as a patron of drunkards, whoremongers, and gluttons. His teachings gradually became more widely known in the fifteenth century with the rediscovery of important texts, but his ideas did not become acceptable until the seventeenth century, when the French Catholic priest Pierre Gassendi revived a modified version of them, which was promoted by other writers, including Walter Charleton and Robert Boyle. His influence grew considerably during and after the Enlightenment, profoundly impacting the ideas of major thinkers, including John Locke, Thomas Jefferson, Jeremy Bentham, and Karl Marx. Contents 1 Life 1.1 Upbringing and influences 1.2 Teaching career 1.3 Death 2 Teachings 2.1 Epistemology 2.2 Ethics 2.3 Physics 2.4 Theology 2.5 Epicurean paradox 2.6 Politics 3 Works 4 Legacy 4.1 Ancient Epicureanism 4.2 Middle Ages 4.3 Renaissance 4.4 Revival 4.5 Enlightenment and after 5 See also 6 Notes 7 References 7.1 Bibliography 8 Further reading 9 External links Life[edit] Upbringing and influences[edit] Athens Mytilene Samos Colophon Lampsacus Map of Greece showing locations associated with Epicurus Epicurus was born in the Athenian settlement on the Aegean island of Samos in February 341 BC.[4][5][6] His parents, Neocles and Chaerestrate, were both Athenian-born, and his father was an Athenian citizen.[4] Epicurus grew up during the final years of the Greek Classical Period.[7] Plato had died seven years before Epicurus was born and Epicurus was seven years old when Alexander the Great crossed the Hellespont into Persia.[8] As a child, Epicurus would have received a typical ancient Greek education.[9] As such, according to Norman Wentworth DeWitt, "it is inconceivable that he would have escaped the Platonic training in geometry, dialectic, and rhetoric."[9] Epicurus is known to have studied under the instruction of a Samian Platonist named Pamphilus, probably for about four years.[9] His Letter of Menoeceus and surviving fragments of his other writings strongly suggest that he had extensive training in rhetoric.[9][10] After the death of Alexander the Great, Perdiccas expelled the Athenian settlers on Samos to Colophon, on the coast of what is now Turkey.[11][10] After the completion of his military service, Epicurus joined his family there. He studied under Nausiphanes, who followed the teachings of Democritus,[10][11] and later those of Pyrrho,[12][13] whose way of life Epicurus greatly admired.[14] Allocation of key positions and satrapies following the Partition of Babylon in 323 BC after the death of Alexander the Great. Epicurus came of age at a time when Greek intellectual horizons were vastly expanding due to the rise of the Hellenistic Kingdoms across the Near East.[15] Epicurus's teachings were heavily influenced by those of earlier philosophers, particularly Democritus. Nonetheless, Epicurus differed from his predecessors on several key points of determinism and vehemently denied having been influenced by any previous philosophers, whom he denounced as "confused". Instead, he insisted that he had been "self-taught".[16][17][18] According to DeWitt, Epicurus's teachings also show influences from the contemporary philosophical school of Cynicism.[19] The Cynic philosopher Diogenes of Sinope was still alive when Epicurus would have been in Athens for his required military training and it is possible they may have met.[19] Diogenes's pupil Crates of Thebes (c. 365 – c. 285 BC) was a close contemporary of Epicurus.[19] Epicurus agreed with the Cynics' quest for honesty, but rejected their "insolence and vulgarity", instead teaching that honesty must be coupled with courtesy and kindness.[19] Epicurus shared this view with his contemporary, the comic playwright Menander.[20] Epicurus's Letter to Menoeceus, possibly an early work of his, is written in an eloquent style similar to that of the Athenian rhetorician Isocrates (436–338 BC),[19] but, for his later works, he seems to have adopted the bald, intellectual style of the mathematician Euclid.[19] Epicurus's epistemology also bears an unacknowledged debt to the later writings of Aristotle (384–322 BC), who rejected the Platonic idea of hypostatic Reason and instead relied on nature and empirical evidence for knowledge about the universe.[15] During Epicurus's formative years, Greek knowledge about the rest of the world was rapidly expanding due to the Hellenization of the Near East and the rise of Hellenistic kingdoms.[15] Epicurus's philosophy was consequently more universal in its outlook than those of his predecessors, since it took cognizance of non-Greek peoples as well as Greeks.[15] He may have had access to the now-lost writings of the historian and ethnographer Megasthenes, who wrote during the reign of Seleucus I Nicator (ruled 305–281 BC).[15] Teaching career[edit] Marble sculpture depicting Epicurus enthroned During Epicurus's lifetime, Platonism was the dominant philosophy in higher education.[21] Epicurus's opposition to Platonism formed a large part of his thought.[22][23] Over half of the forty Principal Doctrines of Epicureanism are flat contradictions of Platonism.[22] In around 311 BC, Epicurus, when he was around thirty years old, began teaching in Mytilene.[22][10] Around this time, Zeno of Citium, the founder of Stoicism, arrived in Athens, at the age of about twenty-one, but Zeno did not begin teaching what would become Stoicism for another twenty years.[22] Although later texts, such as the writings of the first-century BC Roman orator Cicero, portray Epicureanism and Stoicism as rivals,[22] this rivalry seems to have only emerged after Epicurus's death.[22][22] Epicurus's teachings caused strife in Mytilene and he was forced to leave. He then founded a school in Lampsacus before returning to Athens in c. 306 BC, where he remained until his death.[5] There he founded The Garden (κῆπος), a school named for the garden he owned that served as the school's meeting place, about halfway between the locations of two other schools of philosophy, the Stoa and the Academy.[24][10] The Garden was more than just a school;[6] it was "a community of like-minded and aspiring practitioners of a particular way of life."[6] The primary members were Hermarchus, the financier Idomeneus, Leonteus and his wife Themista, the satirist Colotes, the mathematician Polyaenus of Lampsacus, and Metrodorus of Lampsacus, the most famous popularizer of Epicureanism. His school was the first of the ancient Greek philosophical schools to admit women as a rule rather than an exception,[citation needed] and the biography of Epicurus by Diogenes Laërtius lists female students such as Leontion and Nikidion.[25] An inscription on the gate to The Garden is recorded by Seneca the Younger in epistle XXI of Epistulae morales ad Lucilium: "Stranger, here you will do well to tarry; here our highest good is pleasure."[26] According to Diskin Clay, Epicurus himself established a custom of celebrating his birthday annually with common meals, befitting his stature as heros ktistes ("founding hero") of the Garden. He ordained in his will annual memorial feasts for himself on the same date (10th of Gamelion month).[27] Epicurean communities continued this tradition,[28] referring to Epicurus as their "saviour" (soter) and celebrating him as hero. The hero cult of Epicurus may have operated as a Garden variety civic religion.[29] However, clear evidence of an Epicurean hero cult, as well as the cult itself, seems buried by the weight of posthumous philosophical interpretation.[30] Epicurus never married and had no known children. He was most likely a vegetarian.[31][32] Death[edit] Diogenes Laërtius records that, according to Epicurus's successor Hermarchus, Epicurus died a slow and painful death in 270 BC at the age of seventy-two from a stone blockage of his urinary tract.[33][34] Despite being in immense pain, Epicurus is said to have remained cheerful and to have continued to teach until the very end.[33] Possible insights into Epicurus's death may be offered by the extremely brief Epistle to Idomeneus, included by Diogenes Laërtius in Book X of his Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers.[35] The authenticity of this letter is uncertain and it may be a later pro-Epicurean forgery intended to paint an admirable portrait of the philosopher to counter the large number of forged epistles in Epicurus's name portraying him unfavorably.[35] I have written this letter to you on a happy day to me, which is also the last day of my life. For I have been attacked by a painful inability to urinate, and also dysentery, so violent that nothing can be added to the violence of my sufferings. But the cheerfulness of my mind, which comes from the recollection of all my philosophical contemplation, counterbalances all these afflictions. And I beg you to take care of the children of Metrodorus, in a manner worthy of the devotion shown by the young man to me, and to philosophy.[36] If authentic, this letter would support the tradition that Epicurus was able to remain joyful to the end, even in the midst of his suffering.[35] It would also indicate that he maintained an especial concern for the wellbeing of children.[37] Teachings[edit] Main article: Epicureanism Illustration from 1885 of a small bronze bust of Epicurus from Herculaneum. Three Epicurus bronze busts were recovered from the Villa of the Papyri, as well as text fragments.[38] Epistemology[edit] Epicurus and his followers had a well-developed epistemology, which developed as a result of their rivalry with other philosophical schools.[39][40] Epicurus wrote a treatise entitled Κανών, or Rule, in which he explained his methods of investigation and theory of knowledge.[41] This book, however, has not survived,[41] nor does any other text that fully and clearly explains Epicurean epistemology, leaving only mentions of this epistemology by several authors to reconstruct it.[39][40] Epicurus was an ardent Empiricist;[15][42][43] believing that the senses are the only reliable sources of information about the world.[15][44][43] He rejected the Platonic idea of "Reason" as a reliable source of knowledge about the world apart from the senses[15] and was bitterly opposed to the Pyrrhonists and Academic Skeptics, who not only questioned the ability of the senses to provide accurate knowledge about the world, but also whether it is even possible to know anything about the world at all.[45] Epicurus maintained that the senses never deceive humans, but that the senses can be misinterpreted.[46][47] Epicurus held that the purpose of all knowledge is to aid humans in attaining ataraxia.[48][49] He taught that knowledge is learned through experiences rather than innate[50] and that the acceptance of the fundamental truth of the things a person perceives is essential to a person's moral and spiritual health.[51][49] In the Letter to Pythocles, he states, "If a person fights the clear evidence of his senses he will never be able to share in genuine tranquility."[52] Epicurus regarded gut feelings as the ultimate authority on matters of morality and held that whether a person feels an action is right or wrong is a far more cogent guide to whether that act really is right or wrong than abstracts maxims, strict codified rules of ethics, or even reason itself.[53] Epicurus permitted that any and every statement that is not directly contrary to human perception has the possibility to be true.[54] Nonetheless, anything contrary to a person's experience can be ruled out as false.[55] Epicureans often used analogies to everyday experience to support their argument of so-called "imperceptibles", which included anything that a human being cannot perceive, such as the motion of atoms.[56] In line with this principle of non-contradiction, the Epicureans believed that events in the natural world may have multiple causes that are all equally possible and probable.[57] Lucretius writes in On the Nature of Things, as translated by William Ellery Leonard: There be, besides, some thing Of which 'tis not enough one only cause To state—but rather several, whereof one Will be the true: lo, if thou shouldst espy Lying afar some fellow's lifeless corse, 'Twere meet to name all causes of a death, That cause of his death might thereby be named: For prove thou mayst he perished not by steel, By cold, nor even by poison nor disease, Yet somewhat of this sort hath come to him We know—And thus we have to say the same In divers cases.[58] Epicurus strongly favored naturalistic explanations over theological ones.[59] In his Letter to Pythocles, he offers four different possible natural explanations for thunder, six different possible natural explanations for lightning, three for snow, three for comets, two for rainbows, two for earthquakes, and so on.[60] Although all of these explanations are now known to be false, they were an important step in the history of science, because Epicurus was trying to explain natural phenomena using natural explanations, rather than resorting to inventing elaborate stories about gods and mythic heroes.[60] Ethics[edit] Marble relief from the first or second century showing the mythical transgressor Ixion being tortured on a spinning fiery wheel in Tartarus. Epicurus taught that stories of such punishment in the afterlife are ridiculous superstitions and that believing in them prevents people from attaining ataraxia.[61][62] Epicurus was a hedonist, meaning he taught that what is pleasurable is morally good and what is painful is morally evil.[63][64][65][6] He idiosyncratically defined "pleasure" as the absence of suffering[64][6] and taught that all humans should seek to attain the state of ataraxia, meaning "untroubledness", a state in which the person is completely free from all pain or suffering.[66][67][68] He argued that most of the suffering which human beings experience is caused by the irrational fears of death, divine retribution, and punishment in the afterlife.[61][62] In his Letter to Menoeceus, Epicurus explains that people seek wealth and power on account of these fears, believing that having more money, prestige, or political clout will save them from death.[61][62] He, however, maintains that death is the end of existence, that the terrifying stories of punishment in the afterlife are ridiculous superstitions, and that death is therefore nothing to be feared.[61][62][69] He writes in his Letter to Menoeceus: "Accustom thyself to believe that death is nothing to us, for good and evil imply sentience, and death is the privation of all sentience;... Death, therefore, the most awful of evils, is nothing to us, seeing that, when we are, death is not come, and, when death is come, we are not."[70] From this doctrine arose the Epicurean epitaph: Non fui, fui, non-sum, non-curo ("I was not; I was; I am not; I do not care"), which is inscribed on the gravestones of his followers and seen on many ancient gravestones of the Roman Empire. This quotation is often used today at humanist funerals.[71] The Tetrapharmakos presents a summary of the key points of Epicurean ethics:[72] Don't fear god Don't worry about death What is good is easy to get What is terrible is easy to endure Although Epicurus has been commonly misunderstood as an advocate of the rampant pursuit of pleasure, he, in fact, maintained that a person can only be happy and free from suffering by living wisely, soberly, and morally.[64][73][74] He strongly disapproved of raw, excessive sensuality and warned that a person must take into account whether the consequences of his actions will result in suffering,[64][75][65][74] writing, "the pleasant life is produced not by a string of drinking bouts and revelries, nor by the enjoyment of boys and women, nor by fish and the other items on an expensive menu, but by sober reasoning."[64] He also wrote that a single good piece of cheese could be equally pleasing as an entire feast.[65][76] Furthermore, Epicurus taught that "it is not possible to live pleasurably without living sensibly and nobly and justly", because a person who engages in acts of dishonesty or injustice will be "loaded with troubles" on account of his own guilty conscience and will live in constant fear that his wrongdoings will be discovered by others.[64][77][78] A person who is kind and just to others, however, will have no fear and will be more likely to attain ataraxia.[64][77] Epicurus distinguished between two different types of pleasure: "moving" pleasures (κατὰ κίνησιν ἡδοναί) and "static" pleasures (καταστηματικαὶ ἡδοναί).[79][80] "Moving" pleasures occur when one is in the process of satisfying a desire and involve an active titillation of the senses.[79] After one's desires have been satisfied (e.g. when one is full after eating), the pleasure quickly goes away and the suffering of wanting to fulfill the desire again returns.[79][81] For Epicurus, static pleasures are the best pleasures because moving pleasures are always bound up with pain.[79][81] Epicurus had a low opinion of sex and marriage, regarding both as having dubious value.[82] Instead, he maintained that platonic friendships are essential to living a happy life.[83] One of the Principle Doctrines states, "Of the things wisdom acquires for the blessedness of life as a whole, far the greatest is the possession of friendship."[84][85] He also taught that philosophy is itself a pleasure to engage in.[83] One of the quotes from Epicurus recorded in the Vatican Sayings declares, "In other pursuits, the hard-won fruit comes at the end. But in philosophy, delight keeps pace with knowledge. It is not after the lesson that enjoyment comes: learning and enjoyment happen at the same time."[86][85] Epicurus distinguishes between three types of desires: natural and necessary, natural but unnecessary, and vain and empty. Natural and necessary desires include the desires for food and shelter. These are easy to satisfy, difficult to eliminate, bring pleasure when satisfied, and are naturally limited. Going beyond these limits produces unnecessary desires, such as the desire for luxury foods. Although food is necessary, luxury food is not necessary. Correspondingly, Epicurus advocates a life of hedonistic moderation by reducing desire, thus eliminating the unhappiness caused by unfulfilled desires. Vain desires include desires for power, wealth, and fame. These are difficult to satisfy because no matter how much one gets, one can always want more. These desires are inculcated by society and by false beliefs about what we need. They are not natural and are to be shunned.[87] Epicurus' teachings were introduced into medical philosophy and practice by the Epicurean doctor Asclepiades of Bithynia, who was the first physician who introduced Greek medicine in Rome. Asclepiades introduced the friendly, sympathetic, pleasing and painless treatment of patients. He advocated humane treatment of mental disorders, had insane persons freed from confinement and treated them with natural therapy, such as diet and massages. His teachings are surprisingly modern; therefore Asclepiades is considered to be a pioneer physician in psychotherapy, physical therapy and molecular medicine.[88] Physics[edit] Epicurus writes in his Letter to Herodotus that "nothing ever arises from the nonexistent", indicating that all events therefore have causes, regardless of whether those causes are known or unknown.[89] Similarly, he also writes that nothing ever passes away into nothingness, because, "if an object that passes from our view were completely annihilated, everything in the world would have perished, since that into which things were dissipated would be nonexistent."[90] He therefore states: "The totality of things was always just as it is at present and will always remain the same because there is nothing into which it can change, inasmuch as there is nothing outside the totality that could intrude and effect change."[90] Like Democritus before him, Epicurus taught that all matter is entirely made of extremely tiny particles called "atoms" (Greek: ἄτομος; atomos, meaning "indivisible").[91] For Epicurus and his followers, the existence of atoms was a matter of empirical observation;[92] Epicurus's devoted follower, the Roman poet Lucretius, cites the gradual wearing down of rings from being worn, statues from being kissed, stones from being dripped on by water, and roads from being walked on in On the Nature of Things as evidence for the existence of atoms as tiny, imperceptible particles.[92] Also like Democritus, Epicurus was a materialist who taught that the only things that exist are atoms and void.[93][10] Void occurs in any place where there are no atoms.[94] Epicurus and his followers believed that atoms and void are both infinite and that the universe is therefore boundless.[95] In On the Nature of Things, Lucretius argues this point using the example of a man throwing a javelin at the theoretical boundary of a finite universe.[96] He states that the javelin must either go past the edge of the universe, in which case it is not really a boundary, or it must be blocked by something and prevented from continuing its path, but, if that happens, then the object blocking it must be outside the confines of the universe.[96] As a result of this belief that the universe and the number of atoms in it are infinite, Epicurus and the Epicureans believed that there must also be infinitely many worlds within the universe.[97] Epicurus taught that the motion of atoms is constant, eternal, and without beginning or end.[98] He held that there are two kinds of motion: the motion of atoms and the motion of visible objects.[98] Both kinds of motion are real and not illusory.[99] Democritus had described atoms as not only eternally moving, but also eternally flying through space, colliding, coalescing, and separating from each other as necessary.[100] In a rare departure from Democritus's physics, Epicurus posited the idea of atomic "swerve" (παρέγκλισις parénklisis; Latin: clinamen), one of his best-known original ideas.[101][b] According to this idea, atoms, as they are travelling through space, may deviate slightly from the course they would ordinarily be expected to follow.[101] Epicurus's reason for introducing this doctrine was because he wanted to preserve the concepts of free will and ethical responsibility while still maintaining the deterministic physical model of atomism.[102] Lucretius describes it, saying, "It is this slight deviation of primal bodies, at indeterminate times and places, which keeps the mind as such from experiencing an inner compulsion in doing everything it does and from being forced to endure and suffer like a captive in chains."[103] Epicurus was first to assert human freedom as a result of the fundamental indeterminism in the motion of atoms. This has led some philosophers to think that, for Epicurus, free will was caused directly by chance. In his On the Nature of Things, Lucretius appears to suggest this in the best-known passage on Epicurus' position.[104] In his Letter to Menoeceus, however, Epicurus follows Aristotle and clearly identifies three possible causes: "some things happen of necessity, others by chance, others through our own agency." Aristotle said some things "depend on us" (eph'hemin). Epicurus agreed, and said it is to these last things that praise and blame naturally attach. For Epicurus, the "swerve" of the atoms simply defeated determinism to leave room for autonomous agency.[105] Theology[edit] First-century AD Roman fresco from Pompeii, showing the mythical human sacrifice of Iphigenia, daughter of Agamemnon. Epicurus's devoted follower, the Roman poet Lucretius, cited this myth as an example of the evils of popular religion, in contrast to the more wholesome theology advocated by Epicurus.[106] In his Letter to Menoeceus, a summary of his own moral and theological teachings, the first piece of advice Epicurus himself gives to his student is: "First, believe that a god is an indestructible and blessed animal, in accordance with the general conception of god commonly held, and do not ascribe to god anything foreign to his indestructibility or repugnant to his blessedness."[107] Epicurus maintained that he and his followers knew that the gods exist because "our knowledge of them is a matter of clear and distinct perception", meaning that people can empirically sense their presences.[108] He did not mean that people can see the gods as physical objects, but rather that they can see visions of the gods sent from the remote regions of interstellar space in which they actually reside.[108] According to George K. Strodach, Epicurus could have easily dispensed of the gods entirely without greatly altering his materialist worldview,[108] but the gods still play one important function in Epicurus's theology as the paragons of moral virtue to be emulated and admired.[108] Epicurus rejected the conventional Greek view of the gods as anthropomorphic beings who walked the earth like ordinary people, fathered illegitimate offspring with mortals, and pursued personal feuds.[108] Instead, he taught that the gods are morally perfect, but detached and immobile beings who live in the remote regions of interstellar space.[109] In line with these teachings, Epicurus adamantly rejected the idea that deities were involved in human affairs in any way.[107][110] Epicurus maintained that the gods are so utterly perfect and removed from the world that they are incapable of listening to prayers or supplications or doing virtually anything aside from contemplating their own perfections.[109] In his Letter to Herodotus, he specifically denies that the gods have any control over natural phenomena, arguing that this would contradict their fundamental nature, which is perfect, because any kind of worldly involvement would tarnish their perfection.[110] He further warned that believing that the gods control natural phenomena would only mislead people into believing the superstitious view that the gods punish humans for wrongdoing, which only instills fear and prevents people from attaining ataraxia.[110] Epicurus himself criticizes popular religion in both his Letter to Menoeceus and his Letter to Herodotus, but in a restrained and moderate tone.[111] Later Epicureans mainly followed the same ideas as Epicurus, believing in the existence of the gods, but emphatically rejecting the idea of divine providence.[107] Their criticisms of popular religion, however, are often less gentle than those of Epicurus himself.[112] The Letter to Pythocles, written by a later Epicurean, is dismissive and contemptuous towards popular religion[112] and Epicurus's devoted follower, the Roman poet Lucretius (c. 99 BC – c. 55 BC), passionately assailed popular religion in his philosophical poem On the Nature of Things.[112] In this poem, Lucretius declares that popular religious practices not only do not instill virtue, but rather result in "misdeeds both wicked and ungodly", citing the mythical sacrifice of Iphigenia as an example.[106] Lucretius argues that divine creation and providence are illogical, not because the gods do not exist, but rather because these notions are incompatible with the Epicurean principles of the gods' indestructibility and blessedness.[113][114] The later Pyrrhonist philosopher Sextus Empiricus (c. 160 – c. 210 AD) rejected the teachings of the Epicureans specifically because he regarded them as theological "Dogmaticists".[115] Epicurean paradox[edit] The most famous version of the problem of evil is attributed to Epicurus by David Hume (pictured), who was relying on an attribution of it to him by the Christian apologist Lactantius. The trilemma does not occur in any of Epicurus's extant writings, however. If Epicurus did write some version of it, it would have been an argument against divine providence, not the existence of deities.[116] See also: Problem of evil § Epicurus, and Trilemma § Epicurus' trilemma The Epicurean paradox or riddle of Epicurus or Epicurus' trilemma is a version of the problem of evil. Lactantius attributes this trilemma to Epicurus in De Ira Dei, 13, 20-21: God, he says, either wishes to take away evils, and is unable; or He is able, and is unwilling; or He is neither willing nor able, or He is both willing and able. If He is willing and is unable, He is feeble, which is not in accordance with the character of God; if He is able and unwilling, He is envious, which is equally at variance with God; if He is neither willing nor able, He is both envious and feeble, and therefore not God; if He is both willing and able, which alone is suitable to God, from what source then are evils? Or why does He not remove them? In Dialogues concerning Natural Religion (1779), David Hume also attributes the argument to Epicurus: Epicurus’s old questions are yet unanswered. Is he willing to prevent evil, but not able? then is he impotent. Is he able, but not willing? then is he malevolent. Is he both able and willing? whence then is evil? No extant writings of Epicurus contain this argument.[116] However, the vast majority of Epicurus's writings have been lost and it is possible that some form of this argument may have been found in his lost treatise On the Gods, which Diogenes Laërtius describes as one of his greatest works.[116] If Epicurus really did make some form of this argument, it would not have been an argument against the existence of deities, but rather an argument against divine providence.[116] Epicurus's extant writings demonstrate that he did believe in the existence of deities.[107] Furthermore, religion was such an integral part of daily life in Greece during the early Hellenistic Period that it is doubtful anyone during that period could have been an atheist in the modern sense of the word.[107] Instead, the Greek word ἄθεος (átheos), meaning "without a god", was used as a term of abuse, not as an attempt to describe a person's beliefs.[107] Politics[edit] Epicurus promoted an innovative theory of justice as a social contract. Justice, Epicurus said, is an agreement neither to harm nor be harmed, and we need to have such a contract in order to enjoy fully the benefits of living together in a well-ordered society. Laws and punishments are needed to keep misguided fools in line who would otherwise break the contract. But the wise person sees the usefulness of justice, and because of his limited desires, he has no need to engage in the conduct prohibited by the laws in any case. Laws that are useful for promoting happiness are just, but those that are not useful are not just. (Principal Doctrines 31–40) Epicurus discouraged participation in politics, as doing so leads to perturbation and status seeking. He instead advocated not drawing attention to oneself. This principle is epitomised by the phrase lathe biōsas (λάθε βιώσας), meaning "live in obscurity", "get through life without drawing attention to yourself", i.e., live without pursuing glory or wealth or power, but anonymously, enjoying little things like food, the company of friends, etc. Plutarch elaborated on this theme in his essay Is the Saying "Live in Obscurity" Right? (Εἰ καλῶς εἴρηται τὸ λάθε βιώσας, An recte dictum sit latenter esse vivendum) 1128c; cf. Flavius Philostratus, Vita Apollonii 8.28.12.[117] Works[edit] Epicurus, Nuremberg Chronicle Epicurus was an extremely prolific writer.[118][116][62][66] According to Diogenes Laërtius, he wrote around 300 treatises on a variety of subjects.[116][62] More original writings of Epicurus have survived to the present day than of any other Hellenistic Greek philosopher.[66] Nonetheless, the vast majority of everything he wrote has now been lost[118][116][62] and most of what is known about Epicurus's teachings come from the writings of his later followers, particularly the Roman poet Lucretius.[62] The only surviving complete works by Epicurus are three relatively lengthy letters, which are quoted in their entirety in Book X of Diogenes Laërtius's Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers, and two groups of quotes: the Principal Doctrines (Κύριαι Δόξαι), which are likewise preserved through quotation by Diogenes Laërtius, and the Vatican Sayings, preserved in a manuscript from the Vatican Library that was first discovered in 1888.[62] In the Letter to Herodotus and the Letter to Pythocles, Epicurus summarizes his philosophy on nature and, in the Letter to Menoeceus, he summarizes his moral teachings.[62] Numerous fragments of Epicurus's lost thirty-seven volume treatise On Nature have been found among the charred papyrus fragments at the Villa of the Papyri at Herculaneum.[62][66] Scholars first began attempting to unravel and decipher these scrolls in 1800, but the efforts are painstaking and are still ongoing.[62] According to Diogenes Laertius (10.27-9), the major works of Epicurus include: On Nature, in 37 books On Atoms and the Void On Love Abridgment of the Arguments employed against the Natural Philosophers Against the Megarians Problems Fundamental Propositions (Kyriai Doxai) On Choice and Avoidance On the Chief Good On the Criterion (the Canon) Chaeridemus, On the Gods On Piety Hegesianax Four essays on Lives Essay on Just Dealing Neocles Essay addressed to Themista The Banquet (Symposium) Eurylochus Essay addressed to Metrodorus Essay on Seeing Essay on the Angle in an Atom Essay on Touch Essay on Fate Opinions on the Passions Treatise addressed to Timocrates Prognostics Exhortations On Images On Perceptions Aristobulus Essay on Music (i.e., on music, poetry, and dance) On Justice and the other Virtues On Gifts and Gratitude Polymedes Timocrates (three books) Metrodorus (five books) Antidorus (two books) Opinions about Diseases and Death, addressed to Mithras Callistolas Essay on Kingly Power Anaximenes Letters Legacy[edit] Ancient Epicureanism[edit] Bust of Epicurus leaning against his disciple Metrodorus in the Louvre Museum Epicureanism was extremely popular from the very beginning.[119][120][121] Diogenes Laërtius records that the number of Epicureans throughout the world exceeded the populations of entire cities.[121] Nonetheless, Epicurus was not universally admired and, within his own lifetime, he was vilified as an ignorant buffoon and egoistic sybarite.[64][122] He remained the most simultaneously admired and despised philosopher in the Mediterranean for the next nearly five centuries.[122] Epicureanism rapidly spread beyond the Greek mainland all across the Mediterranean world.[119] By the first century BC, it had established a strong foothold in Italy.[119] The Roman orator Cicero (106 – 43 BC), who deplored Epicurean ethics, lamented, "the Epicureans have taken Italy by storm."[119] The overwhelming majority of surviving Greek and Roman sources are vehemently negative towards Epicureanism[123] and, according to Pamela Gordon, they routinely depict Epicurus himself as "monstrous or laughable".[123] Many Romans in particular took a negative view of Epicureanism, seeing its advocacy of the pursuit of voluptas ("pleasure") as contrary to the Roman ideal of virtus ("manly virtue").[124] The Romans therefore often stereotyped Epicurus and his followers as weak and effeminate.[125] Prominent critics of his philosophy include prominent authors such as the Roman Stoic Seneca the Younger (c. 4 BC – AD 65) and the Greek Middle Platonist Plutarch (c. 46 – c. 120), who both derided these stereotypes as immoral and disreputable.[121] Gordon characterizes anti-Epicurean rhetoric as so "heavy-handed" and misrepresentative of Epicurus's actual teachings that they sometimes come across as "comical".[126] In his De vita beata, Seneca states that the "sect of Epicurus... has a bad reputation, and yet it does not deserve it." and compares it to "a man in a dress: your chastity remains, your virility is unimpaired, your body has not submitted sexually, but in your hand is a tympanum."[127] Epicureanism was a notoriously conservative philosophical school;[5][17][18] although Epicurus's later followers did expand on his philosophy, they dogmatically retained what he himself had originally taught without modifying it.[5][17][18] Epicureans and admirers of Epicureanism revered Epicurus himself as a great teacher of ethics, a savior, and even a god.[128] His image was worn on finger rings, portraits of him were displayed in living rooms, and wealthy followers venerated likenesses of him in marble sculpture.[129] His admirers revered his sayings as divine oracles, carried around copies of his writings, and cherished copies of his letters like the letters of an apostle.[129] On the twentieth day of every month, admirers of his teachings would perform a solemn ritual to honor his memory.[120] At the same time, opponents of his teachings denounced him with vehemence and persistence.[120] However, in the first and second centuries AD, Epicureanism gradually began to decline as it failed to compete with Stoicism, which had an ethical system more in line with traditional Roman values.[130] Epicureanism also suffered decay in the wake of Christianity, which was also rapidly expanding throughout the Roman Empire.[131] Of all the Greek philosophical schools, Epicureanism was the one most at odds with the new Christian teachings, since Epicureans believed that the soul was mortal, denied the existence of an afterlife, denied that the divine had any active role in human life, and advocated pleasure as the foremost goal of human existence.[131] As such, Christian writers such as Justin Martyr (c. 100–c. 165 AD), Athenagoras of Athens (c. 133–c. 190), Tertullian (c. 155–c. 240), and Clement of Alexandria (c. 150–c. 215), Arnobius (died c. 330), and Lactantius all singled it out for the most vitriolic criticism.[131] In spite of this, DeWitt argues that Epicureanism and Christianity share much common language, calling Epicureanism "the first missionary philosophy" and "the first world philosophy".[132] Both Epicureanism and Christianity placed strong emphasis on the importance of love and forgiveness[133] and early Christian portrayals of Jesus are often similar to Epicurean portrayals of Epicurus.[133] DeWitt argues that Epicureanism, in many ways, helped pave the way for the spread of Christianity by "helping to bridge the gap between Greek intellectualism and a religious way of life" and "shunt[ing] the emphasis from the political to the social virtues and offer[ing] what may be called a religion of humanity."[134] Middle Ages[edit] Dante Alighieri meets Epicurus in his Inferno in the Sixth Circle of Hell, where he and his followers are imprisoned in flaming coffins for having believed that the soul dies with the body,[131] shown here in an illustration by Gustave Doré. By the early fifth century AD, Epicureanism was virtually extinct.[131] The Christian Church Father Augustine of Hippo (354–430 AD) declared, "its ashes are so cold that not a single spark can be struck from them."[131] While the ideas of Plato and Aristotle could easily be adapted to suit a Christian worldview, the ideas of Epicurus were not nearly as easily amenable.[131] As such, while Plato and Aristotle enjoyed a privileged place in Christian philosophy throughout the Middle Ages, Epicurus was not held in such esteem.[131] Information about Epicurus's teachings was available, through Lucretius's On the Nature of Things, quotations of it found in medieval Latin grammars and florilegia, and encyclopedias, such as Isidore of Seville's Etymologiae (seventh century) and Hrabanus Maurus's De universo (ninth century),[131] but there is little evidence that these teachings were systematically studied or comprehended.[131] During the Middle Ages, Epicurus was remembered by the educated as a philosopher,[131] but he frequently appeared in popular culture as a gatekeeper to the Garden of Delights, the "proprietor of the kitchen, the tavern, and the brothel."[131] He appears in this guise in Martianus Capella's Marriage of Mercury and Philology (fifth century), John of Salisbury's Policraticus (1159), John Gower's Mirour de l'Omme, and Geoffrey Chaucer's Canterbury Tales.[131] Epicurus and his followers appear in Dante Alighieri's Inferno in the Sixth Circle of Hell, where they are imprisoned in flaming coffins for having believed that the soul dies with the body.[131] Renaissance[edit] Epicurus is shown among other famous philosophers in the Italian Renaissance painter Raphael's School of Athens (1509–1511).[135] Epicurus's genuine busts were unknown prior to 1742, so early modern artists who wanted to depict him were forced to make up their own iconographies.[136] In 1417, a manuscript-hunter named Poggio Bracciolini discovered a copy of Lucretius's On the Nature of Things in a monastery near Lake Constance.[131] The discovery of this manuscript was met with immense excitement, because scholars were eager to analyze and study the teachings of classical philosophers and this previously-forgotten text contained the most comprehensive account of Epicurus's teachings known in Latin.[131] The first scholarly dissertation on Epicurus, De voluptate (On Pleasure) by the Italian Humanist and Catholic priest Lorenzo Valla was published in 1431.[131] Valla made no mention of Lucretius or his poem.[131] Instead, he presented the treatise as a discussion on the nature of the highest good between an Epicurean, a Stoic, and a Christian.[131] Valla's dialogue ultimately rejects Epicureanism,[131] but, by presenting an Epicurean as a member of the dispute, Valla lent Epicureanism credibility as a philosophy that deserved to be taken seriously.[131] None of the Quattrocento Humanists ever clearly endorsed Epicureanism,[131] but scholars such as Francesco Zabarella (1360–1417), Francesco Filelfo (1398–1481), Cristoforo Landino (1424–1498), and Leonardo Bruni (c. 1370–1444) did give Epicureanism a fairer analysis than it had traditionally received and provided a less overtly hostile assessment of Epicurus himself.[131] Nonetheless, "Epicureanism" remained a pejorative, synonymous with extreme egoistic pleasure-seeking, rather than a name of a philosophical school.[131] This reputation discouraged orthodox Christian scholars from taking what others might regard as an inappropriately keen interest in Epicurean teachings.[131] Epicureanism did not take hold in Italy, France, or England until the seventeenth century.[137] Even the liberal religious skeptics who might have been expected to take an interest in Epicureanism evidently did not;[137] Étienne Dolet (1509–1546) only mentions Epicurus once in all his writings and François Rabelais (between 1483 and 1494–1553) never mentions him at all.[138] Michel de Montaigne (1533–1592) is the exception to this trend, quoting a full 450 lines of Lucretius's On the Nature of Things in his Essays.[138] His interest in Lucretius, however, seems to have been primarily literary and he is ambiguous about his feelings on Lucretius's Epicurean worldview.[138] During the Protestant Reformation, the label "Epicurean" was bandied back and forth as an insult between Protestants and Catholics.[138] Revival[edit] The French priest and philosopher Pierre Gassendi is responsible for reviving Epicureanism in modernity as an alternative to Aristotelianism.[138] In the seventeenth century, the French Catholic priest and scholar Pierre Gassendi (1592–1655) sought to dislodge Aristotelianism from its position of the highest dogma by presenting Epicureanism as a better and more rational alternative.[138] In 1647, Gassendi published his book De vita et moribus Epicuri (The Life and Morals of Epicurus), a passionate defense of Epicureanism.[138] In 1649, he published a commentary on Diogenes Laërtius's Life of Epicurus.[138] He left Syntagma philosophicum (Philosophical Compendium), a synthesis of Epicurean doctrines, unfinished at the time of his death in 1655.[138] It was finally published in 1658, after undergoing revision by his editors.[138] Gassendi modified Epicurus's teachings to make them palatable for a Christian audience.[138] For instance, he argued that atoms were not eternal, uncreated, and infinite in number, instead contending that an extremely large but finite number of atoms were created by God at creation.[138] As a result of Gassendi's modifications, his books were never censored by the Catholic Church.[138] They came to exert profound influence on later writings about Epicurus.[138] Gassendi's version of Epicurus's teachings became popular among some members of English scientific circles.[138] For these scholars, however, Epicurean atomism was merely a starting point for their own idiosyncratic adaptations of it.[138] To orthodox thinkers, Epicureanism was still regarded as immoral and heretical.[138] For instance, Lucy Hutchinson (1620–1681), the first translator of Lucretius's On the Nature of Things into English, railed against Epicurus as "a lunatic dog" who formulated "ridiculous, impious, execrable doctrines".[138] Epicurus's teachings were made respectable in England by the natural philosopher Walter Charleton (1619–1707), whose first Epicurean work, The Darkness of Atheism Dispelled by the Light of Nature (1652), advanced Epicureanism as a "new" atomism.[138] His next work Physiologia Epicuro-Gassendo-Charletoniana, or a Fabrick of Science Natural, upon a Hypothesis of Atoms, Founded by Epicurus, Repaired by Petrus Gassendus, and Augmented by Walter Charleton (1654) emphasized this idea.[138] These works, together with Charleton's Epicurus's Morals (1658), provided the English public with readily available descriptions of Epicurus's philosophy and assured orthodox Christians that Epicureanism was no threat to their beliefs.[138] The Royal Society, chartered in 1662, advanced Epicurean atomism.[139] One of the most prolific defenders of atomism was the chemist Robert Boyle (1627–1691), who argued for it in publications such as The Origins of Forms and Qualities (1666), Experiments, Notes, etc. about the Mechanical Origin and Production of Divers Particular Qualities (1675), and Of the Excellency and Grounds of the Mechanical Hypothesis (1674).[139] By the end of the seventeenth century, Epicurean atomism was widely accepted by members of the English scientific community as the best model for explaining the physical world,[140] but it had been modified so greatly that Epicurus was no longer seen as its original parent.[140] Enlightenment and after[edit] The Anglican bishop Joseph Butler's anti-Epicurean polemics in his Fifteen Sermons Preached at the Rolls Chapel (1726) and Analogy of Religion (1736) set the tune for what most orthodox Christians believed about Epicureanism for the remainder of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.[140] Nonetheless, there are a few indications from this time period of Epicurus's improving reputation.[140] Epicureanism was beginning to lose its associations with indiscriminate and insatiable gluttony, which had been characteristic of its reputation ever since antiquity.[140] Instead, the word "epicure" began to refer to a person with extremely refined taste in food.[140][141] Examples of this usage include "Epicurean cooks / sharpen with cloyless sauce his appetite" from William Shakespeare's Antony and Cleopatra (Act II. scene i; c. 1607)[141] and "such an epicure was Potiphar—to please his tooth and pamper his flesh with delicacies" from William Whately's Prototypes (1646).[140] Around the same time, the Epicurean injunction to "live in obscurity" was beginning to gain popularity as well.[140] In 1685, Sir William Temple (1628–1699) abandoned a promising career as a diplomat and instead retired to his garden, devoting himself to writing essays on Epicurus's moral teachings.[140] That same year, John Dryden translated the celebrated lines from Book II of Lucretius's On the Nature of Things: "'Tis pleasant, safely to behold from shore / The rowling ship, and hear the Tempest roar."[140] Meanwhile, John Locke (1632–1704) adapted Gassendi's modified version of Epicurus's epistemology, which became highly influential on English empiricism.[140] Many thinkers with sympathies towards the Enlightenment endorsed Epicureanism as an admirable moral philosophy.[140] Thomas Jefferson (1743–1826), one of the Founding Fathers of the United States, declared in 1819, "I too am an Epicurean. I consider the genuine (not imputed) doctrines of Epicurus as containing everything rational in moral philosophy which Greece and Rome have left us."[140] The German philosopher Karl Marx (1818–1883), whose ideas are basis of Marxism, was profoundly influenced as a young man by the teachings of Epicurus[142] and his doctoral thesis was a Hegelian dialectical analysis of the differences between the natural philosophies of Democritus and Epicurus.[143] Marx viewed Democritus as a rationalist skeptic, whose epistemology was inherently contradictory, but saw Epicurus as a dogmatic empiricist, whose worldview is internally consistent and practically applicable.[144] The British poet Alfred, Lord Tennyson (1809–1892) praised "the sober majesties / of settled, sweet, Epicurean life" in his 1868 poem "Lucretius".[140] Epicurus's ethical teachings also had an indirect impact on the philosophy of Utilitarianism in England during the nineteenth century.[140] Academic interest in Epicurus and other Hellenistic philosophers increased over the course of the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries, with an unprecedented number of monographs, articles, abstracts, and conference papers being published on the subject.[140] The texts from the library of Philodemus of Gadara in the Villa of the Papyri in Herculaneum, first discovered between 1750 and 1765, are being deciphered, translated, and published by scholars part of the Philodemus Translation Project, funded by the United States National Endowment for the Humanities, and part of the Centro per lo Studio dei Papiri Ercolanesi in Naples.[140] Epicurus's popular appeal among non-scholars is difficult to gauge,[140] but it seems to be relatively comparable to the appeal of more traditionally popular ancient Greek philosophical subjects such as Stoicism, Aristotle, and Plato.[145] See also[edit] Eikas Epikoros Philosophy of happiness Separation of church and state Notes[edit] ^ /ˌɛpɪˈkjʊərəs/;[2] Ancient Greek: Ἐπίκουρος, Epíkouros, "ally, comrade" ^ The only fragment in Greek about this central notion is from the Oenoanda inscription (fr. 54 in Smith's edition). The best known reference is in Lucretius's On the Nature of Things, 2.251. References[edit] ^ Bunnin & Yu (2004). The Blackwell Dictionary of Western Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. ^ Jones, Daniel (2006). Cambridge English Pronouncing Dictionary. 17th edition. Cambridge UP. ^ Diogenes Laertius, Book IX, Chapter 11, Section 64. ^ a b Apollodorus of Athens (reported by Diogenes Laërtius, Lives of Eminent Philosophers, 10.14–15) gives his birth on the fourth day of the month February in the third year of the 109th Olympiad, in the archonship of Sosigenes ^ a b c d Barnes 1986, p. 367. ^ a b c d e Gordon 2012, p. 3. ^ DeWitt 1954, pp. 8–9. ^ DeWitt 1954, p. 8. ^ a b c d DeWitt 1954, p. 12. ^ a b c d e f Wasson 2016. ^ a b "Epicurus". Epicurus - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. 2018. ^ Diogenes Laertius, ix. ^ Sextus Empiricus, adv. Math. i. 1. ^ Diogenes Laërtius Lives of the Eminent Philosophers Book IX, Chapter 11, Section 61 http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0258%3Abook%3D9%3Achapter%3D11 ^ a b c d e f g h DeWitt 1954, p. 10. ^ Huby, Pamela M. (1978). "Epicurus' Attitude to Democritus". Phronesis. 23 (1): 80–86. doi:10.1163/156852878X00235. JSTOR 4182030. ^ a b c Erler 2011, p. 9. ^ a b c Fish & Sanders 2011, pp. 1–2. ^ a b c d e f DeWitt 1954, p. 9. ^ DeWitt 1954, pp. 9–10. ^ DeWitt 1954, pp. 9, 11. ^ a b c d e f g DeWitt 1954, p. 11. ^ Long 1999, pp. 239–240. ^ David Konstan (2018). "Epicurus". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. ^ Diogenes Laërtius, Lives of the Eminent Philosophers, Book X, Section 7 ^ "Epistulae morales ad Lucilium". ^ D. Smith, Nicholas (2000). Reason and religion in Socratic philosophy. p. 160. ISBN 978-0-19-513322-6. ^ Glad, Clarence E. Paul and Philodemus: adaptability in Epicurean and early Christian psychology. p. 176. ISBN 978-90-04-10067-1. ^ Nussbaum, Martha Craven (2009). The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics. p. 119. ISBN 978-0-691-14131-2. ^ Clay, Diskin (1998). Paradosis and survival: three chapters in the history of Epicurean philosophy. p. 76. ISBN 978-0-472-10896-1. ^ "The Hidden History of Greco-Roman Vegetarianism". ^ Dombrowski, Daniel A. (1984). The Philosophy of Vegetarianism. ISBN 978-0870234316. ^ a b Bitsori, Maria; Galanakis, Emmanouil (2004). "Epicurus' death". World Journal of Urology. 22 (6): 466–469. doi:10.1007/s00345-004-0448-2. PMID 15372192. S2CID 41741603. ^ In the second year of the 127th Olympiad, in the archonship of Pytharatus, according to Diogenes Laërtius, Lives of Eminent Philosophers, 10.15 ^ a b c Gordon 2012, pp. 141–142. ^ Diogenes Laërtius, Lives of Eminent Philosophers, 10.22 (trans. C.D. Yonge). ^ Gordon 2012, p. 142. ^ Sheila Dillon (2006). Ancient Greek Portrait Sculpture: Contexts, Subjects, and Styles. Cambridge University Press. p. 45. ISBN 9780521854986 – via Google Books. ^ a b Strodach 2012, p. 26. ^ a b Asmis 1984, pp. 9–13. ^ a b Asmis 1984, pp. 10, 19. ^ Strodach 2012, pp. 27–32. ^ a b Asmis 1984, p. 9. ^ Strodach 2012, pp. 22–32. ^ Strodach 2012, p. 23. ^ Strodach 2012, pp. 23–24. ^ Asmis 1984, p. 11. ^ Strodach 2012, pp. 26–27. ^ a b Asmis 1984, p. 12. ^ Strodach 2012, pp. 27–28. ^ Strodach 2012, pp. 28–29. ^ Strodach 2012, p. 29. ^ Strodach 2012, pp. 30–31. ^ Strodach 2012, pp. 32–34. ^ Strodach 2012, p. 34. ^ Strodach 2012, pp. 34–35. ^ Strodach 2012, pp. 35–39. ^ Carus, Titus Lucretius (July 2008). Of The Nature of Things. Project Gutenberg EBook. 785. William Ellery Leonard (translator). Project Gutenberg. Book VI, Section Extraordinary and Paradoxical Telluric Phenomena, Line 9549–9560 ^ Strodach 2012, pp. 36–38. ^ a b Strodach 2012, p. 38. ^ a b c d Strodach 2012, pp. 56–58. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Kenny 2004, p. 94. ^ Strodach 2012, p. 58. ^ a b c d e f g h Barnes 1986, p. 372. ^ a b c Kenny 2004, p. 95. ^ a b c d Barnes 1986, p. 371. ^ Folse, Henry (2005). How Epicurean Metaphysics leads to Epicurean Ethics. Department of Philosophy, Loyola University, New Orleans, LA. ^ Konstan, David (2018). "Epicurus". Epicurus, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2013 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. forthcoming URL = ^ Gordon 2012, pp. 3–4. ^ Rosenbaum 2004, p. 175. ^ "Epicurus (c 341-270 BC)". British Humanist Association. ^ Hutchinson, D. S. (Introduction) (1994). The Epicurus Reader: Selected Writings and Testimonia. Cambridge: Hackett. p. vi. ^ Strodach 2012, pp. 58–60. ^ a b Gordon 2012, pp. 5–7. ^ Strodach 2012, p. 59. ^ Gordon 2013, p. 141. ^ a b Strodach 2012, pp. 58–59. ^ "Epicurus Principal Doctrines 5 and 31 transl. by Robert Drew Hicks". 1925. ^ a b c d Epicurus | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy ^ Diogenes Laërtius, The Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers, X:136. ^ a b Kenny 2004, pp. 95–96. ^ Gordon 2012, p. 4. ^ a b Gordon 2012, pp. 4–5. ^ Epicurus, Principle Doctrines 27 ^ a b Gordon 2012, p. 5. ^ Epicurus, Vatican Sayings 27 ^ https://www.iep.utm.edu/epicur/#SH5c ^ C, Yapijakis (2009). "Hippocrates of Kos, the father of clinical medicine, and Asclepiades of Bithynia, the father of molecular medicine. Review". In Vivo. 23 (4): 507–14. PMID 19567383. ^ Strodach 2012, pp. 8–9. ^ a b Strodach 2012, p. 10. ^ Strodach 2012, pp. 1–8, 11. ^ a b Strodach 2012, p. 11. ^ Strodach 2012, pp. 12–13. ^ Strodach 2012, pp. 12. ^ Strodach 2012, p. 13. ^ a b Strodach 2012, pp. 13–14. ^ Strodach 2012, pp. 14–15. ^ a b Strodach 2012, p. 15. ^ Strodach 2012, pp. 15–16. ^ Strodach 2012, p. 16. ^ a b Strodach 2012, pp. 16–17. ^ Strodach 2012, pp. 17–18. ^ Strodach 2012, p. 18. ^ "On the Nature of Things, 289-293" – via Perseus Project. ^ "Epicurus page on Information Philosopher; cf. Letter to Menoeceus, §134". ^ a b Strodach 2012, pp. 46–47. ^ a b c d e f Hickson 2014, pp. 27. ^ a b c d e Strodach 2012, p. 39. ^ a b Strodach 2012, pp. 39–40. ^ a b c Strodach 2012, pp. 42–43. ^ Strodach 2012, pp. 45–46. ^ a b c Strodach 2012, p. 46. ^ Hickson 2014, pp. 27–28. ^ Strodach 2012, pp. 43–45. ^ Hickson 2014, p. 28. ^ a b c d e f g Hickson 2014, pp. 26–27. ^ https://www.livius.org/sources/content/philostratus-life-of-apollonius/philostratus-life-of-apollonius-8.26-31/#8.28 ^ a b Long 1999, p. 240. ^ a b c d Jones 2010, p. 320. ^ a b c DeWitt 1954, p. 3. ^ a b c Gordon 2012, p. 1. ^ a b DeWitt 1954, pp. 3–4. ^ a b Gordon 2012, pp. 1–2. ^ Gordon 2012, p. 9. ^ Gordon 2012, pp. 9, 12–13. ^ Gordon 2012, p. 10. ^ Seneca. Of a Happy Life. ^ DeWitt 1954, pp. 3, 31–32. ^ a b DeWitt 1954, pp. 3, 32. ^ Jones 2010, pp. 320–321. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y Jones 2010, p. 321. ^ DeWitt 1954, pp. 8, 26–33. ^ a b DeWitt 1954, pp. 31–32. ^ DeWitt 1954, pp. 8, cf. 26–33. ^ Frischer 1982, p. 155. ^ Frischer 1982, pp. 155–156. ^ a b Jones 2010, pp. 321–322. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Jones 2010, p. 322. ^ a b Jones 2010, pp. 322–323. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Jones 2010, p. 323. ^ a b Brewer & Evans 1989, p. 388. ^ Schafer 2003, p. 127. ^ Schafer 2003, pp. 127–128. ^ Schafer 2003, pp. 127–129. ^ Jones 2010, pp. 323–324. Bibliography[edit] Asmis, Elizabeth (1984), Epicurus' Scientific Method, Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, ISBN 978-08014-1465-7 Barnes, Jonathan (1986), "15: Hellenistic Philosophy and Science", in Boardman, John; Griffin, Jasper; Murray, Oswyn (eds.), The Oxford History of the Classical World, Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, pp. 365–385, ISBN 978-0198721123 Brewer, Ebenezer Cobham; Evans, Ivor H. (1989), Brewer's Dictionary of Phrase and Fable (14th ed.), New York City, New York, Grand Rapids, Michigan, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, St. Louis, Missouri, San Francisco, California, London, England, Singapore, Singapore, Sydney, Australia, Tokyo, Japan, and Toronto, Canada: Harper & Row Publishers, ISBN 978-0-06-016200-9 DeWitt, Norman Wentworth (1954), Epicurus and His Philosophy, Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, ISBN 978-0-816-65745-2 Erler, Michael (2011), "Chapter II: Autodidact and student: on the relationship of authority and autonomy in Epicurus and the Epicurean tradition", in Fish, Jeffrey; Sanders, Kirk R. (eds.), Epicurus and the Epicurean Tradition, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 9–28, ISBN 978-0-521-19478-5 Fish, Jeffrey; Sanders, Kirk R. (2011), "Chapter I: Introduction", in Fish, Jeffrey; Sanders, Kirk R. (eds.), Epicurus and the Epicurean Tradition, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–8, ISBN 978-0-521-19478-5 Frischer, Bernard (1982), The Sculpted Word: Epicureanism and Philosophical Recruitment in Ancient Greece, Berkeley and Los Angeles, California and London, England: University of California Press, ISBN 978-0-520-04190-5 Gordon, Pamela (2012), The Invention and Gendering of Epicurus, Ann Arbor, Michigan: The University of Michigan Press, ISBN 978-0-472-02817-7 Gordon, Pamela (2013), "Epistulatory Epicureans", in Boter, G. J.; Chaniotis, A.; Coleman, K. M.; de Jong, I. J. F.; Reinhardt, T. (eds.), Epistolary Narratives in Ancient Greek Literature, Mnemosyne: Supplements: Monographs on Greek and Latin Language and Literature, 359, Leiden, The Netherlands: Koninklijke Brill, ISBN 978-90-04-25303-2 Jones, Howard (2010), "Epicurus and Epicureanism", in Grafton, Anthony; Most, Glenn W.; Settis, Salvatore (eds.), The Classical Tradition, Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, pp. 320–324, ISBN 978-0-674-03572-0 Hickson, Michael W. (2014), "A Brief History of Problems of Evil", in McBrayer, Justin P.; Howard-Snyder, Daniel (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to The Problem of Evil, Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 26–27, ISBN 978-1-118-60797-8 Kenny, Anthony (2004), Ancient Philosophy, A New History of Western Philosophy, 1, Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, pp. 94–96, ISBN 978-0-19-875273-8 Long, A. A. (1999), "Epicurus", A Companion to Philosophers, Malden, Massachusetts and Oxford, England: Wiley Publishers, Ltd., pp. 239–243, ISBN 978-0-63-122967-4 Rosenbaum, Stephen E. (2004), "Chapter 11: How to Be Dead and Not Care: A Defense of Epicurus", in Benatar, David (ed.), Life, Death & Meaning: Key Philosophical Readings on the Big Questions, Lanham, Maryland, Boulder, Colorado, New York City, New York, Toronto, Canada, and Oxford, England: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., ISBN 978-1-442-20169-9 Schafer, Paul M. (2003), "The Young Marx on Epicurus: Dialectical Atomism and Human Freedom", in Gordon, Dane L.; Suits, David B. (eds.), Epicurus: His Continuing Influence and Contemporary Relevance, Rochester, New York: Rochester Institute of Technology, Cary Graphic Arts Press, pp. 127–138, ISBN 978-0-9713-4596-6 Strodach, George K. (2012), "Introduction", The Art of Happiness, New York City, New York: Penguin Classics, ISBN 978-0-14-310721-7 Wasson, Donald L. (7 September 2016), "Epicurus", Ancient History Encyclopedia Further reading[edit] Texts Epicurus (1994). Inwood, Brad; Gerson, Lloyd P. (eds.). The Epicurus Reader. Selected Writings and Testimonia. Indianapolis: Hackett. ISBN 978-0-87220-242-9. Epicurus (1993). The essential Epicurus : letters, principal doctrines, Vatican sayings, and fragments. Translated by O'Connor, Eugene. Buffalo, N.Y.: Prometheus Books. ISBN 978-0-87975-810-3. Epicurus (1964). Letters, principal doctrines, and Vatican sayings. Translated by Geer, Russel M. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill. Laërtius, Diogenes (1969). Caponigri, A. Robert (ed.). Lives of the Philosophers. Chicago: Henry Regnery Co. Lucretius Carus, Titus (1976). On the nature of the universe. Translated by Latham, R. E. London: Penguin Books. ISBN 978-0-14-044018-8. Körte, Alfred (1987). Epicureanism : two collections of fragments and studies (in Greek). New York: Garland. ISBN 978-0-8240-6915-5. Oates, Whitney J. (1940). The Stoic and Epicurean philosophers, The Complete Extant Writings of Epicurus, Epictetus, Lucretius and Marcus Aurelius. New York: Modern Library. Diogenes of Oinoanda (1993). The Epicurean inscription. Translated by Smith, Martin Ferguson. Napoli: Bibliopolis. ISBN 978-88-7088-270-4. Studies Bailey C. (1928). The Greek Atomists and Epicurus, Oxford: Clarendon Press. Bakalis, Nikolaos (2005). Handbook of Greek Philosophy from Thales to the Stoics. Analysis and fragments. Victoria: Trafford. ISBN 978-1-4120-4843-9. Gordon, Pamela (1996). Epicurus in Lycia. The Second-Century World of Diogenes of Oenoanda. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press. ISBN 978-0-472-10461-1. Gottlieb, Anthony (2000). The Dream of Reason. A History of Western Philosophy from the Greeks to the Renaissance. New York: W.W. Norton. ISBN 978-0-393-04951-0. Hibler, Richard W. (1984). Happiness Through Tranquillity. The school of Epicurus. Lanham, MD: University Press of America. ISBN 978-0-8191-3861-3. Hicks, R. D. (1910). Stoic and Epicurean. New York: Scribner. Jones, Howard (1989). The Epicurean Tradition. London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-02069-5. O'Keefe, Tim (2009). Epicureanism. University of California Press. Panichas, George Andrew (1967). Epicurus. New York: Twayne Publishers. Rist, J.M. (1972). Epicurus. An introduction. London: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-08426-0. Warren, James (2009). The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism. New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-05218-7347-5. William Wallace. Epicureanism. SPCK (1880) External links[edit] Epicurusat Wikipedia's sister projects Definitions from Wiktionary Media from Wikimedia Commons Quotations from Wikiquote Texts from Wikisource Data from Wikidata  Greek Wikisource has original text related to this article: Κύριαι Δόξαι  Greek Wikisource has original text related to this article: Ἐπιστολὴ πρὸς Μενοικέα Konstan, David. "Epicurus". In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. O'Keefe, Tim. "Epicurus". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stoic And Epicurean by Robert Drew Hicks (1910) (Internet Archive) Epicurea, Hermann Usener - full text Works by or about Epicurus at Internet Archive Works by Epicurus at LibriVox (public domain audiobooks) . Society of Friends of Epicurus Discussion Forum for Epicurus and Epicurean philosophy - EpicureanFriends.com v t e Epicureanism Philosophers Greek era Epicurus Polyaenus Metrodorus Batis Leontion Carneiscus Idomeneus Hermarchus Colotes Themista Leonteus Polystratus Dionysius of Lamptrai Basilides Philonides Diogenes of Tarsus Alcaeus and Philiscus Apollodorus Demetrius Lacon Zeno of Sidon Roman era Amafinius Rabirius Titus Albucius Phaedrus Philodemus Lucretius Patro Catius Siro Diogenes of Oenoanda Modern era Pierre Gassendi Denis Diderot Jeremy Bentham Jun Tsuji Christopher Hitchens Michel Onfray Philosophy Epicureanism (cf. Hedonism) Tetrapharmakos Concepts Aponia Ataraxia Clinamen Eudaimonia Hedone Metakosmia Works On the Nature of Things List of English translations of De rerum natura v t e Ancient Greek schools of philosophy Pre-Socratic Ionian Epimenides of Knossos Pherecydes of Syros Diogenes Metrodorus of Lampsacus Xenophanes Xeniades Theodorus of Cyrene Anacharsis Milesian Thales Anaximander Anaximenes Ephesian Heraclitus Cratylus Antisthenes Atomist Leucippus Democritus Italian Hippo Musaeus of Athens Themistoclea Pythagorean Pythagoras Hippasus Philolaus Archytas Alcmaeon Brontinus Theano Arignote Myia Damo Calliphon Hermotimus Metrodorus of Cos Eurytus Eleatic Parmenides Zeno Melissus Pluralist Anaxagoras Archelaus Empedocles Sophist Protagoras Gorgias Prodicus Hippias Antiphon Lycophron Damon Callicles Thrasymachus Euthydemus Dionysodorus Euenus Critias Socratic Socrates Xenophon Cebes of Thebes Simmias of Thebes Cynic Antisthenes Diogenes Diodorus Zoilus Onesicritus Philiscus Crates Hipparchia Metrocles Monimus Cleomenes Bion Sotades Menippus Menedemus Cercidas Teles Meleager Favonius Demetrius Dio Chrysostom Agathobulus Secundus Demonax Peregrinus Proteus Theagenes Oenomaus Pancrates Crescens Heraclius Horus Asclepiades Sallustius Cyrenaic Aristippus Arete of Cyrene Aristippus the Younger Theodorus the Atheist Antipater of Cyrene Aristotle of Cyrene Hegesias of Cyrene Anniceris Dionysius the Renegade Euhemerus Eretrian Phaedo of Elis Menedemus Asclepiades of Phlius Megarian Euclid of Megara Ichthyas Thrasymachus Eubulides Stilpo Nicarete Pasicles Bryson Dialectical Clinomachus Apollonius Cronus Euphantus Dionysius Diodorus Cronus Philo Alexinus Panthoides Peripatetic Aristotle Aristoxenus Clearchus of Soli Dicaearchus Eudemus of Rhodes Theophrastus Strato of Lampsacus Lyco of Troas Aristo of Ceos Critolaus Diodorus of Tyre Erymneus Andronicus of Rhodes Cratippus Andronicus of Rhodes Boethus of Sidon Aristocles of Messene Aspasius Adrastus Alexander of Aphrodisias Themistius Olympiodorus the Elder Platonic Plato Eudoxus Philip of Opus Aristonymus Coriscus Erastus of Scepsis Demetrius of Amphipolis Euaeon of Lampsacus Heraclides Python of Aenus Hestiaeus of Perinthus Lastheneia of Mantinea Timolaus of Cyzicus Speusippus Axiothea of Phlius Heraclides Ponticus Menedemus of Pyrrha Xenocrates Crantor Polemon Crates of Athens Hellenistic Academic Skeptic Middle Arcesilaus Diocles of Cnidus Lacydes Telecles Evander Hegesinus New Carneades Hagnon of Tarsus Metrodorus of Stratonicea Clitomachus Charmadas Aeschines of Neapolis Philo of Larissa Cicero Dio of Alexandria Epicurean Epicurus Polyaenus Metrodorus Batis Leontion Carneiscus Idomeneus Hermarchus Colotes Themista Leonteus Polystratus Dionysius of Lamptrai Basilides Philonides Diogenes of Tarsus Alcaeus and Philiscus Apollodorus Demetrius Lacon Zeno of Sidon Amafinius Rabirius Titus Albucius Phaedrus Philodemus Lucretius Patro Catius Siro Diogenes of Oenoanda Middle Platonic Antiochus Philo of Alexandria Plutarch Justin Martyr Gaius Albinus Alcinous Apuleius Atticus Maximus of Tyre Numenius of Apamea Longinus Clement of Alexandria Origen the Pagan Calcidius Neoplatonist Ammonius Saccas Plotinus Disciples Origen Amelius Porphyry Iamblichus Sopater Eustathius of Cappadocia Sosipatra Aedesius Dexippus Chrysanthius Theodorus of Asine Julian Sallustius Maximus of Ephesus Eusebius of Myndus Priscus of Epirus Antoninus Gregory of Nyssa Hypatia Augustine Macrobius Plutarch of Athens Hierius Asclepigenia Hierocles Syrianus Hermias Aedesia Proclus Ammonius Hermiae Asclepiodotus Hegias Zenodotus Marinus Agapius Isidore Damascius Simplicius Priscian Neopythagorean Nigidius Figulus Apollonius of Tyana Moderatus of Gades Nicomachus Alexicrates Anaxilaus Bolus of Mendes Cronius Damis Numenius of Apamea Secundus the Silent Quintus Sextius Sotion Theon of Smyrna Pyrrhonist Pyrrho Aenesidemus Agrippa the Skeptic Arcesilaus Hecataeus of Abdera Heraclides of Tarentum Herodotus of Tarsus Menodotus of Nicomedia Nausiphanes Sextus Empiricus Theodas of Laodicea Timon of Phlius Stoic Greek Zeno of Citium Persaeus Aratus of Soli Athenodorus of Soli Aristo of Chios Apollophanes of Antioch Dionysius the Renegade Sphaerus Herillus of Carthage Cleanthes Eratosthenes Hermagoras of Amphipolis Chrysippus Dioscorides Aristocreon Zeno of Tarsus Eudromus Crates of Mallus Diogenes of Babylon Zenodotus Apollodorus of Seleucia Basilides Antipater of Tarsus Apollodorus of Athens Archedemus of Tarsus Panaetius of Rhodes Boethus of Sidon Polemon of Athens Marcus Vigellius Heraclides of Tarsus Dardanus Mnesarchus Publius Rutilius Rufus Stilo Dionysius of Cyrene Quintus Lucilius Balbus Hecato of Rhodes Diotimus the Stoic Posidonius Crinis Proclus of Mallus Diodotus the Stoic Geminus of Rhodes Athenodoros Cordylion Apollonius of Tyre Cato the Younger Antipater of Tyre Porcia Catonis Apollonides Jason of Nysa Athenodoros Cananites Quintus Sextius Arius Didymus Roman Attalus Papirius Fabianus Seneca Thrasea Paetus Lucius Annaeus Cornutus Chaeremon of Alexandria Paconius Agrippinus Publius Egnatius Celer Persius Helvidius Priscus Arulenus Rusticus Musonius Rufus Fannia Euphrates the Stoic Cleomedes Epictetus Hierocles Flavius Arrianus Basilides Apollonius of Chalcedon Claudius Maximus Junius Rusticus Marcus Aurelius v t e Ancient Greece Timeline History Geography Periods Cycladic civilization Minoan civilization Mycenaean civilization Greek Dark Ages Archaic period Classical Greece Hellenistic Greece Roman Greece Geography Aegean Sea Aeolis Alexandria Antioch Cappadocia Crete Cyprus Doris Ephesus Epirus Hellespont Ionia Ionian Sea Macedonia Magna Graecia Miletus Peloponnesus Pergamon Pontus Taurica Ancient Greek colonies City states Politics Military City states Argos Athens Byzantion Chalcis Corinth Eretria Kerkyra Larissa Megalopolis Megara Rhodes Samos Sparta Syracuse Thebes Politics Boule Koinon Proxeny Tagus Tyrant Amphictyonic League Athenian Agora Areopagus Ecclesia Graphe paranomon Heliaia Ostracism Spartan Apella Ephor Gerousia Macedon Synedrion Koinon Military Wars Athenian military Scythian archers Antigonid Macedonian army Army of Macedon Ballista Cretan archers Hellenistic armies Hippeis Hoplite Hetairoi Macedonian phalanx Phalanx Peltast Pezhetairos Sarissa Sacred Band of Thebes Sciritae Seleucid army Spartan army Strategos Toxotai Xiphos Xyston People List of ancient Greeks Rulers Kings of Argos Archons of Athens Kings of Athens Kings of Commagene Diadochi Kings of Lydia Kings of Macedonia Kings of Paionia Attalid kings of Pergamon Kings of Pontus Kings of Sparta Tyrants of Syracuse Philosophers Anaxagoras Anaximander Anaximenes Antisthenes Aristotle Democritus Diogenes of Sinope Empedocles Epicurus Gorgias Heraclitus Hypatia Leucippus Parmenides Plato Protagoras Pythagoras Socrates Thales Zeno Authors Aeschylus Aesop Alcaeus Archilochus Aristophanes Bacchylides Euripides Herodotus Hesiod Hipponax Homer Ibycus Lucian Menander Mimnermus Panyassis Philocles Pindar Plutarch Polybius Sappho Simonides Sophocles Stesichorus Theognis Thucydides Timocreon Tyrtaeus Xenophon Others Agesilaus II Agis II Alcibiades Alexander the Great Aratus Archimedes Aspasia Demosthenes Epaminondas Euclid Hipparchus Hippocrates Leonidas Lycurgus Lysander Milo of Croton Miltiades Pausanias Pericles Philip of Macedon Philopoemen Praxiteles Ptolemy Pyrrhus Solon Themistocles Groups Philosophers Playwrights Poets Tyrants By culture Ancient Greek tribes Thracian Greeks Ancient Macedonians Society Culture Society Agriculture Calendar Clothing Coinage Cuisine Economy Education Festivals Homosexuality Law Olympic Games Pederasty Philosophy Prostitution Religion Slavery Warfare Wedding customs Wine Arts and science Architecture Greek Revival architecture Astronomy Literature Mathematics Medicine Music Musical system Pottery Sculpture Technology Theatre Religion Funeral and burial practices Mythology mythological figures Temple Twelve Olympians Underworld Sacred places Eleusis Delphi Delos Dion Dodona Mount Olympus Olympia Structures Athenian Treasury Lion Gate Long Walls Philippeion Theatre of Dionysus Tunnel of Eupalinos Temples Aphaea Artemis Athena Nike Erechtheion Hephaestus Hera, Olympia Parthenon Samothrace Zeus, Olympia Language Proto-Greek Mycenaean Homeric Dialects Aeolic Arcadocypriot Attic Doric Ionic Locrian Macedonian Pamphylian Koine Writing Linear A Linear B Cypriot syllabary Greek alphabet Greek numerals Attic numerals Greek colonisation South Italy Alision Brentesion Caulonia Chone Croton Cumae Elea Heraclea Lucania Hipponion Hydrus Krimisa Laüs Locri Medma Metapontion Neápolis Pandosia (Lucania) Poseidonia Pixous Rhegion Scylletium Siris Sybaris Sybaris on the Traeis Taras Terina Thurii Sicily Akragas Akrai Akrillai Apollonia Calacte Casmenae Catana Gela Helorus Henna Heraclea Minoa Himera Hybla Gereatis Hybla Heraea Kamarina Leontinoi Megara Hyblaea Messana Naxos Segesta Selinous Syracuse Tauromenion Thermae Tyndaris Aeolian Islands Didyme Euonymos Ereikousa Hycesia Lipara/Meligounis Phoenicusa Strongyle Therassía Sardinia Olbia Cyrenaica Balagrae Barca Berenice Cyrene (Apollonia) Ptolemais Iberian Peninsula Akra Leuke Alonis Emporion Helike Hemeroscopion Kalathousa Kypsela Mainake Menestheus's Limin Illicitanus Limin/Portus Illicitanus Rhode Salauris Zacynthos Black Sea north coast Borysthenes Charax Chersonesus Dioscurias Eupatoria Gorgippia Hermonassa Kepoi Kimmerikon Myrmekion Nikonion Nymphaion Olbia Panticapaion Phanagoria Pityus Tanais Theodosia Tyras Tyritake Black Sea south coast Dionysopolis Odessos Anchialos Mesambria Apollonia Salmydessus Heraclea Tium Sesamus Cytorus Abonoteichos Sinope Zaliche Amisos Oinòe Polemonion Thèrmae Cotyora Kerasous Tripolis Trapezous Rhizos Athina Bathus Phasis Lists Cities in Epirus People Place names Stoae Temples Theatres Category Portal Outline v t e Criticism of religion By religion Bahá'í Faith Buddhism Christianity Catholic Jehovah's Witnesses Latter Day Saint movement Protestantism Seventh-day Adventist Unification movement Westboro Baptist Church Hinduism Swaminarayan sect Islam Islamism Twelver Shia Islam Wahhabism Jainism Judaism Monotheism New religious movement Scientology Sikhism Yazdânism Zoroastrianism Religious texts Bible Quran Hadith Mormon sacred texts Book of Mormon Talmud Religious figures Aisha Charles Taze Russell Ellen White Jesus Moses Muhammad Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Saul Religious violence Buddhism Christianity Mormonism Judaism Islam Terrorism Christian Hindu Islamic Jewish Persecution Christian thought on persecution and tolerance War In Islam In Judaism Sectarian violence By country India Anti-Christian violence In Odisha Nigeria Pakistan Books Atheist Manifesto Breaking the Spell Christianity Unveiled God in the Age of Science? God Is Not Great God: The Failed Hypothesis Letter to a Christian Nation The Age of Reason The Blind Watchmaker The Caged Virgin The End of Faith The God Delusion The Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster Why I Am Not a Christian Why I Am Not a Muslim Books critical of Christianity Books critical of Islam Movements Agnosticism Antitheism Atheism Criticism Cārvāka New Atheism Nontheistic religions Parody religion v t e Philosophy of science Concepts Analysis Analytic–synthetic distinction A priori and a posteriori Causality Commensurability Consilience Construct Creative synthesis Demarcation problem Empirical evidence Explanatory power Fact Falsifiability Feminist method Functional contextualism Ignoramus et ignorabimus Inductive reasoning Intertheoretic reduction Inquiry Nature Objectivity Observation Paradigm Problem of induction Scientific law Scientific method Scientific revolution Scientific theory Testability Theory choice Theory-ladenness Underdetermination Unity of science Metatheory of science Coherentism Confirmation holism Constructive empiricism Constructive realism Constructivist epistemology Contextualism Conventionalism Deductive-nomological model Hypothetico-deductive model Inductionism Epistemological anarchism Evolutionism Fallibilism Foundationalism Instrumentalism Pragmatism Model-dependent realism Naturalism Physicalism Positivism / Reductionism / Determinism Rationalism / Empiricism Received view / Semantic view of theories Scientific realism / Anti-realism Scientific essentialism Scientific formalism Scientific skepticism Scientism Structuralism Uniformitarianism Vitalism Philosophy of Physics thermal and statistical Motion Chemistry Biology Geography Social science Technology Engineering Artificial intelligence Computer science Information Mind Psychiatry Psychology Perception Space and time Related topics Alchemy Criticism of science Descriptive science Epistemology Faith and rationality Hard and soft science History and philosophy of science History of science History of evolutionary thought Logic Metaphysics Normative science Pseudoscience Relationship between religion and science Rhetoric of science Science studies Sociology of scientific knowledge Sociology of scientific ignorance Philosophers of science by era Ancient Plato Aristotle Stoicism Epicureans Medieval Averroes Avicenna Roger Bacon William of Ockham Hugh of Saint Victor Dominicus Gundissalinus Robert Kilwardby Early modern Francis Bacon Thomas Hobbes René Descartes Galileo Galilei Pierre Gassendi Isaac Newton David Hume Late modern Immanuel Kant Friedrich Schelling William Whewell Auguste Comte John Stuart Mill Herbert Spencer Wilhelm Wundt Charles Sanders Peirce Wilhelm Windelband Henri Poincaré Pierre Duhem Rudolf Steiner Karl Pearson Contemporary Alfred North Whitehead Bertrand Russell Albert Einstein Otto Neurath C. D. Broad Michael Polanyi Hans Reichenbach Rudolf Carnap Karl Popper Carl Gustav Hempel W. V. O. Quine Thomas Kuhn Imre Lakatos Paul Feyerabend Jürgen Habermas Ian Hacking Bas van Fraassen Larry Laudan Daniel Dennett Category  Philosophy portal  Science portal Authority control BIBSYS: 90181280 BNE: XX1022011 BNF: cb13091438g (data) CANTIC: a10488479 CiNii: DA01009860 GND: 118530585 ISNI: 0000 0001 2136 6309 LCCN: n79121664 LNB: 000093594 NDL: 00620634 NKC: jn19990210193 NLA: 35066534 NLG: 18289 NLI: 000607364 NLK: KAC2018J3454 NSK: 000417947 NTA: 068590253 RERO: 02-A000057679 SELIBR: 185287 SNAC: w6tx3w65 SUDOC: 026851849 Trove: 816706 ULAN: 500258979 VcBA: 495/41961 VIAF: 64141756 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n79121664 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Epicurus&oldid=996549979" Categories: 4th-century BC Greek people 4th-century BC philosophers 4th-century BC writers 3rd-century BC Greek people 3rd-century BC philosophers 3rd-century BC writers 341 BC births 270 BC deaths Ancient Greek epistemologists Ancient Greek ethicists Ancient Greek metaphysicians Ancient Greek philosophers of mind Ancient Greek physicists Ancient Samians Cosmologists Critics of religions Cultural critics Empiricists Epicurean philosophers Epistemologists Greek male writers Hellenistic-era philosophers Materialists Metaphysicians Moral philosophers Ontologists Philosophers of education Philosophers of ethics and morality Philosophers of mind Philosophers of religion Philosophers of science Religious skeptics Simple living advocates Social philosophers Virtue ethicists Hidden categories: Articles containing Ancient Greek (to 1453)-language text Articles with short description Short description matches Wikidata Good articles Use dmy dates from March 2020 Articles with hCards All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from April 2019 Articles containing Latin-language text CS1 Greek-language sources (el) Pages using Sister project links with hidden wikidata Articles with Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy links Articles with Internet Archive links Articles with LibriVox links Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CANTIC identifiers Wikipedia articles with CINII identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with LNB identifiers Wikipedia articles with NDL identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLG identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLI identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NSK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with RERO identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SNAC-ID identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with Trove identifiers Wikipedia articles with ULAN identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers AC with 25 elements Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikiquote Wikisource Languages Afrikaans العربية Aragonés Արեւմտահայերէն Asturianu Azərbaycanca বাংলা Bân-lâm-gú Башҡортса Беларуская Български Bosanski Brezhoneg Català Чӑвашла Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français Gaeilge Galego 한국어 Հայերեն हिन्दी Hrvatski Ido Bahasa Indonesia Íslenska Italiano עברית Jawa ქართული Қазақша Kiswahili Кыргызча Latina Latviešu Lietuvių Lingua Franca Nova Magyar Македонски Malagasy മലയാളം مصرى Bahasa Melayu မြန်မာဘာသာ Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Occitan Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча ਪੰਜਾਬੀ پنجابی Piemontèis Polski Português Română Русский Sardu Scots Shqip Sicilianu Simple English Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Tagalog தமிழ் Татарча/tatarça Türkçe Українська Tiếng Việt Volapük Walon Winaray 吴语 粵語 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 27 December 2020, at 07:29 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1269 ---- Timeline of Roman history - Wikipedia Timeline of Roman history From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search This article is about the ancient polities with their capitals at Rome and Constantinople. For the city, see Timeline of the city of Rome. This is a timeline of Roman history, comprising important legal and territorial changes and political events in the Roman Kingdom and Republic and the Roman and Byzantine Empires. To read about the background of these events, see Ancient Rome and History of the Byzantine Empire. Following tradition, this timeline marks the deposition of Romulus Augustulus and the Fall of Constantinople as the end of Rome in the west and east, respectively. See Third Rome for a discussion of claimants to the succession of Rome. This is a dynamic list and may never be able to satisfy particular standards for completeness. You can help by adding missing items with reliable sources. Millennia: 1st BC · 1st–2nd Centuries: 7th BC · 6th BC · 5th BC · 4th BC · 3rd BC · 2nd BC · 1st BC · 1st · 2nd · 3rd · 4th · 5th · 6th · 7th · 8th · 9th · 10th · 11th · 12th · 13th · 14th · 15th 8th and 7th centuries BC Year Date Event 753 BC 21 April Rome was founded. According to Roman legend, Romulus was the founder and first King of Rome, establishing the Roman Kingdom. 715 BC Numa Pompilius became the second King of Rome. 673 BC Tullus Hostilius became the third King of Rome. 667 BC Byzantium was founded by Megarian colonists. 642 BC Tullus Hostilius died. The Curiate Assembly, one of the legislative assemblies of the Roman Kingdom, elected Ancus Marcius King of Rome. 617 BC Ancus Marcius died. 616 BC The Curiate Assembly elected Lucius Tarquinius Priscus King of Rome. 6th century BC Year Date Event 575 BC The Senate accepted the regent Servius Tullius as king of Rome. 535 BC Servius Tullius was murdered by his daughter Tullia Minor and her husband Lucius Tarquinius Superbus, who declared himself King of Rome on the steps of the Curia Hostilia. 509 BC The patrician Lucretia was raped by Lucius Tarquinius Superbus' son Sextus Tarquinius. Overthrow of the Roman monarchy: Following Lucretia's suicide, Lucius Junius Brutus called the Curiate Assembly, one of the legislative assemblies of the Roman Kingdom. The latter agreed to the overthrow and expulsion of Lucius Tarquinius Superbus and to a provisional constitution under which two consuls acted as a joint executive and a Curiate Assembly held legislative power, and swore never again to let a king rule Rome. It further elected Lucius Junius Brutus and Lucius Tarquinius Collatinus, Lucretia's husband, as consuls. Battle of Silva Arsia: Tarquinian and Veientine forces loyal to Lucius Tarquinius Superbus were defeated in the Silva Arsia by a Roman army. Lucius Junius Brutus was killed. Publius Valerius Publicola, returning to Rome with the spoils of war, was awarded the first Roman Triumph on March 1. The consul Publius Valerius Publicola promulgated a number of liberal reforms, including opening the office of consul to all Roman citizens and placing the treasury under the administration of appointed quaestors. 13 September The Temple of Jupiter Optimus Maximus was ceremonially dedicated to the Capitoline Triad. 508 BC Roman–Etruscan Wars: A Clusian army failed to conquer Rome. 501 BC In the face of a potential Sabine invasion, the Senate passed a senatus consultum authorizing the consuls to appoint a dictator, a magistrate who held absolute power during a national emergency. The dictator would in turn appoint the Magister equitum, the commander of the cavalry. The consuls Titus Lartius and Postumus Cominius Auruncus selected the former as dictator. 5th century BC Year Date Event 496 BC Battle of Lake Regillus: Latin League invasion near modern Frascati which sought to reinstall Lucius Tarquinius Superbus. 494 BC First secessio plebis: Lucius Sicinius Vellutus, the plebs abandoned Rome for the nearby Monte Sacro. 471 BC After a law allowing organization of the plebs tribe, the Plebeian Council was reorganized by tribes rather than curiae. 459 BC Under popular pressure, the Senate increased the tribunes of the plebs from two to ten. 458 BC During the first dictatorship of Cincinnatus, the Aequians staged an offensive, breaking a truce. Cincinnatus defeated the Aquians at the Battle of Mount Algidus and after a triumph, returned to his farm after sixteen days.[1] 449 BC Resolutions of the Plebeian Council were given the full force of law subject to Senate veto. The second of two decemviri, specially-elected ten man commissions, issued the last of the Twelve Tables, the fundamental laws of the Republic. 447 BC The Tribal Assembly was established, and granted the right to elect quaestors. 445 BC Lex Canuleia: Marriage between patricians and plebeians was legalized. 443 BC The offices of the Tribuni militum consulari potestate were established. A collegium of three patrician or plebeian tribunes, one each from specific Roman tribes (the Titienses, the Ramnenses, and the Luceres), would hold the power of the consuls from year to year, subject to the Senate. The office of the censor, a patrician magistrate responsible for conducting the census in years without a consul, was established. 439 BC Cincinnatus was called upon to accept a second dictatorship by the patricians to prevent Spurius Maelius from seizing power; the patricians suspected Spurius of using wheat to purchase the support of the plebeians, to set himself up as a king. Gaius Servilius Ahala was appointed magister equitum in order to stop Maelius; following an attack by Maelius, Ahala slew him. Cincinnatus again resigned his dictatorship and returned to his farm after 21 days.[2] 435 BC Fidenae, an important trade post on the Tiber, was captured from the Veii.[3] 408 BC The Tribuni militum consulari potestate held office. 4th century BC Year Date Event 396 BC Battle of Veii: Roman forces led by the dictator Marcus Furius Camillus conquered Veii. Roman soldiers first earned a salary ("salary" from Latin for "salt"). 394 BC The consuls held office. 391 BC The Tribuni militum consulari potestate held office. 390 BC 18 July Battle of the Allia: The Senones routed a Roman force at the confluence of the rivers Allia and Tiber. The Senones sacked Rome. Among other artifacts, books were destroyed. The history of Rome up to this point had to be mostly reconstructed and is sometimes unreliable or mythological. 367 BC The consuls held office. 366 BC Lucius Sextius was elected the first plebeian consul. The office of Praetor, which took the judiciary responsibilities of the consul and could be held only by a patrician, was established. 351 BC The first plebeian dictator was elected. The first plebeian censor was elected. 343 BC Samnite Wars: Rome marched against the Samnites, probably after an appeal from the Campanians. Battle of Mount Gaurus: A Samnite force was routed by a Roman army near Mount Barbaro. 342 BC The Leges Genuciae were passed, banning a person from holding two offices at the same time, or during any ten-year period; charging interest on loans was also banned. 341 BC Samnite Wars: The Senate agreed a peace, following an appeal by the Samnite to a previous treaty of friendship. 340 BC Latin War: The Latin League invaded Samnium. 339 BC A law was passed which required the election of at least one plebeian censor every five years. 338 BC Latin War: Rome defeated the Latin League armies. 337 BC The first plebeian Praetor was elected. 328 BC Samnite Wars: Rome declared war on the Samnites after their failure to prevent their subjects raiding Fregellae. 321 BC Battle of the Caudine Forks: After being trapped in a mountain pass near Caudium without a water supply, Roman forces were allowed to retreat by a Samnite army. 315 BC Battle of Lautulae: A decisive Samnite victory near Terracina split Roman territory in two. 311 BC Samnite Wars: The Etruscans laid siege to Sutri. 310 BC Battle of Lake Vadimo (310 BC): Rome inflicted a substantial military defeat on the Etruscans at Lake Vadimo. 308 BC Samnite Wars: The Umbri, Picentes and Marsi joined the Samnites against Rome. 306 BC The Hernici declared their independence from Rome. 304 BC Rome conquered the Aequi. Samnite Wars: The treaty of friendship between the Romans and Samnites was restored. 3rd century BC Year Date Event 300 BC The Lex Ogulnia was passed, allowing plebeians to become priests. 298 BC Samnite Wars: Rome declared war on the Samnites after an appeal by the Lucani. Samnite Wars: Rome captured the Samnite cities of Bojano and Castel di Sangro. 297 BC Battle of Tifernum: A Roman army defeated a numerically superior Samnite force at Città di Castello. 295 BC Battle of Sentinum: A Roman army decisively defeated a numerically superior force of Samnites, Etruscans, Umbri and Senones in coalition at Sentinum. The consul Publius Decius Mus (consul 312 BC) was killed. 294 BC Samnite Wars: Roman and Samnite forces battled at Lucera. 293 BC Battle of Aquilonia: A Roman army destroyed the majority of Samnite forces, probably in modern Agnone. A census counted about 270,000 residents of Rome. 291 BC Samnite Wars: Rome conquered and colonized the Samnite city of Venosa. 290 BC Samnite Wars: The last effective Samnite resistance was eliminated. 287 BC Conflict of the Orders: A secessio plebis took place. Conflict of the Orders: The Lex Hortensia was passed, made resolutions of the Plebeian Council (plebiscites) binding on all Romans, they formally only applied to plebeians.[4] 283 BC Battle of Lake Vadimo (283 BC): A Roman army defeated a combined force of Etruscans, Boii and Senones near Lake Vadimo. 281 BC Taranto appealed to Epirus for aid against Rome. 280 BC Pyrrhic War: An Epirote army of some 25,000 landed at Taranto. July Battle of Heraclea: A Greek coalition force led by the Epirote king Pyrrhus of Epirus defeated a Roman army after their deployment of war elephants at Heraclea Lucania. 279 BC Battle of Asculum: A Greek force led by the Epirote king Pyrrhus defeated a Roman army at modern Ascoli Satriano, despite suffering heavy losses. 275 BC Battle of Beneventum (275 BC): Roman and Epirote armies met in a bloody battle at Benevento. 272 BC Pyrrhic War: Pyrrhus withdrew with his army to Epirus. Pyrrhic War: Taranto surrendered to Rome. 267 BC The number of quaestors was raised from four to ten. 264 BC Battle of Messana: A Roman force defeated a Carthaginian and Siracusani garrison at Messina. 242 BC The office of the praetor qui inter peregrinos ius dicit, a Praetor with jurisdiction over foreigners, was created. 241 BC First Punic War: Sicily was organized as the province of Sicilia. 238 BC Mercenary War: Carthage surrendered its claims on Sardinia and Corsica to Rome. 229 BC Illyrian Wars: Rome invaded the territory of the Ardiaei. 228 BC Illyrian Wars: The Ardiaei surrendered some territory, including strategically significant ports, to Rome, ending the war. 225 BC Battle of Telamon: A Roman army decisively defeated a Gallic invasion near modern Talamone. The consul Gaius Atilius Regulus was killed. 219 BC Illyrian Wars: Rome invaded Hvar. 218 BC Second Punic War: A Carthaginian army departed Cartagena. Illyrian Wars: Demetrius of Pharos fled to Macedonia. 216 BC 2 August Battle of Cannae: The Carthaginian general Hannibal decisively defeated a numerically superior Roman force at Cannae. 214 BC First Macedonian War: A Macedonian fleet captured Oricum. Siege of Syracuse (214–212 BC): Rome laid siege to Syracuse. 212 BC Siege of Syracuse (214–212 BC): Roman forces breached the inner citadel of Syracuse and slaughtered its inhabitants. 205 BC First Macedonian War: Rome and Macedonia signed the Treaty of Phoenice, according to which Macedonia renounced its alliance with Carthage in exchange for Roman recognition of its gains in Illyria. 204 BC Second Punic War: The consul Scipio Africanus landed an invasion fleet at Utica. 202 BC 19 October Battle of Zama: A Roman army decisively defeated Carthage, probably near modern Sakiet Sidi Youssef. 201 BC Second Punic War: Carthage accepted Roman conditions for peace, including disarmament, a war indemnity of ten thousand talents, and the cession of Iberia, ending the war. 2nd century BC Year Date Event 200 BC Second Macedonian War: A Roman fleet arrived in Illyria to relieve a Macedonian siege of Abydos. 197 BC The provinces of Hispania Ulterior and Hispania Citerior were organized. The number of quaestors was increased to twelve. The number of Praetors was increased to six. 196 BC Second Macedonian War: Macedonia surrendered its conquests in Greece and agreed to pay a war indemnity, ending the war. 192 BC Roman–Seleucid War: The Seleucid Empire invaded Greece. 188 BC Roman–Seleucid War: The Seleucid Empire signed the Treaty of Apamea, under which it surrendered all territory west of the Taurus Mountains to the Roman clients Rhodes and Pergamon and agreed to disarm its navy and pay a war indemnity of fifteen thousand talents of silver to Rome. 180 BC The Lex Villia annalis, which established minimum ages for high office and required a minimum of two years in private life between offices, was passed. 172 BC Third Macedonian War: Rome declared war on Macedonia. 167 BC Third Macedonian War: The Macedonian king Perseus of Macedon was captured. Macedonia was divided into four districts subject to Rome. 155 BC Lusitanian War: The Lusitanians of Hispania Ulterior rebelled against Rome. 150 BC Fourth Macedonian War: An Andriscus rebelled against Rome, claiming to be Perseus's son and the rightful king of Macedonia. 149 BC Third Punic War: Rome declared war on Carthage. The Lex Calpurnia was passed, establishing a Praetor-led court to hear appeals against extortionate taxes levied by governors in the provinces. 148 BC Fourth Macedonian War: Andriscus was surrendered to Rome to be executed. 146 BC Third Punic War: Roman forces breached the city of Carthage, burned it, and enslaved its surviving inhabitants. Achaean War: Roman forces decisively defeated the armies of the Achaean League at Corinth. The province of Macedonia was organized. The province of Africa was organized on captured Carthaginian territory. 139 BC Lusitanian War: The Lusitanian leader Viriatus was assassinated by his three ambassadors to Rome Audax, Ditalcus and Minurus. Lex Gabinia tabellaria: required a secret ballot in elections of all magistrates. 133 BC The Tribune of the Plebs Tiberius Gracchus was beaten to death by a mob of senators led by the Pontifex Maximus Publius Cornelius Scipio Nasica Serapio (consul 138 BC). 121 BC The province of Gallia Narbonensis was organized. The first Senatus consultum ultimum was passed, granting the consul Lucius Opimius emergency powers to defeat the partisans of Gaius Gracchus. 112 BC Jugurthine War: Rome declared war on Numidia. 107 BC Gaius Marius was elected consul. Marius instituted the Marian reforms of the military, among them the establishment of a standing army and the recruitment of non-property owners. 106 BC Marius was reelected consul. Jugurthine War: The Numidian king Jugurtha was imprisoned in the Mamertine Prison. 105 BC 6 October Battle of Arausio: A coalition of the Cimbri and Teutons inflicted a serious defeat on the Roman army at modern Orange. Some hundred thousand Roman soldiers were killed. 104 BC Marius was elected consul for the first of three years in a row. 102 BC Battle of Aquae Sextiae: Rome decisively defeated the forces of the Teutons and Ambrones and killed some ninety thousand soldiers and civilians. 101 BC Battle of Vercellae: An invasion of Italy by the Cimbri was decisively defeated by a numerically inferior Roman force. Some hundred thousand Cimbri soldiers and civilians were killed along with their king Boiorix. 1st century BC Year Date Event 100 BC Marius was elected consul. 10 December Assassins hired by Marius's political allies Lucius Appuleius Saturninus and Gaius Servilius Glaucia beat to death Gaius Memmius, a candidate for the consulship. 91 BC Social War (91–88 BC): The Roman clients in Italy the Marsi, the Paeligni, the Vestini, the Marrucini, the Picentes, the Frentani, the Hirpini, the Iapyges, Pompeii, Venosa, Lucania and Samnium rebelled against Rome. 88 BC Sulla's first civil war: The consul Sulla led an army of his partisans across the pomerium into Rome. Social War (91–89 BC): The war ended. 87 BC First Mithridatic War: Roman forces landed at Epirus. 85 BC First Mithridatic War: A peace was agreed between Rome and Pontus under which the latter returned to its prewar borders. 83 BC Sulla's second civil war: Sulla landed with an army at Brindisi. Second Mithridatic War: The Roman general Lucius Licinius Murena invaded Pontus. 82 BC Sulla's second civil war: Sulla was declared dictator. 81 BC Second Mithridatic War: Murena withdrew from Pontus. Sulla resigns dictatorship after enacting numerous reforms in the same year. 80 BC Final consulship of Sulla, he leaves Rome once the year is over. Sertorian War: Quintus Sertorius landed on the Iberian Peninsula in support of a Lusitanian rebellion. 73 BC Third Mithridatic War: Pontus invaded Bithynia. Third Servile War: Some seventy gladiators, slaves of Lentulus Batiatus in Capua, made a violent escape. 72 BC Sertorian War: Marcus Perpenna Vento, by now the leader of the Romans in revolt in Iberia, was executed by the general Pompey. 71 BC Third Servile War: The slaves in rebellion were decisively defeated by Roman forces near Petelia. Their leader Spartacus was killed. 66 BC The last of the Cilician pirates were wiped out by Pompey. 63 BC Third Mithridatic War: Defeated, the Pontic king Mithridates VI of Pontus ordered his friend and bodyguard to kill him. Siege of Jerusalem (63 BC): Pompey conquered Jerusalem and entered the Holy of Holies of the Second Temple. Cicero was elected consul. Second Catilinarian conspiracy: A conspiracy led by the senator Catiline to overthrow the Republic was exposed before the Senate. The five conspirators present were summarily executed in the Mamertine Prison. 60 BC Pompey joined a political alliance, the so-called First Triumvirate, with the consul Julius Caesar and the censor Marcus Licinius Crassus. 59 BC Consulship of Julius Caesar. 58 BC Gallic Wars: Roman forces barred the westward migration of the Helvetii across the Rhône. 55 BC 1st Invasion of Britain: Julius Caesar's first invasion of Britain. 54 BC 2nd Invasion of Britain: Julius Caesar's second invasion of Britain. 53 BC 6 May Battle of Carrhae: A Parthian army decisively defeated a numerically superior Roman invasion force near Harran. Crassus was killed. 50 BC Gallic Wars: The last Gaulish rebels were defeated. 49 BC 10 January Caesar's Civil War: Julius Caesar illegally crossed the Rubicon into Italy with his army. 48 BC 4 January Caesar's Civil War: Caesar landed at Durrës in pursuit of Pompey and his partisans the optimates. 46 BC November Caesar left Africa for Iberia in pursuit of Pompey's sons Gnaeus Pompeius and Sextus Pompey. 44 BC 15 March Assassination of Julius Caesar: Caesar was assassinated in the Theatre of Pompey by a conspiracy of senators. 43 BC 27 November The Lex Titia was passed, granting the Second Triumvirate of Octavius (later known as Augustus), Mark Antony and Marcus Aemilius Lepidus the power to make and annul laws and appoint magistrates. 42 BC Liberators' civil war: Augustus and Antony led some thirty legions to northern Greece in pursuit of Caesar's assassins Marcus Junius Brutus the Younger and Gaius Cassius Longinus. 23 October Liberators' civil war: Brutus committed suicide after being defeated in battle. 33 BC Antony's Parthian War: A campaign led by Antony against the Parthian Empire ended in failure. The Second Triumvirate expired. 31 BC 2 September Battle of Actium: Forces loyal to Augustus defeated Antony and his lover Cleopatra, queen of Egypt, in a naval battle near Actium. 30 BC 1 August Final War of the Roman Republic: Antony's forces defected to Augustus. He committed suicide. 30 August Cleopatra committed suicide, probably in Roman custody and by snakebite. The province of Egypt was organized. Augustus took the title pharaoh. 29 BC Moesia was annexed to Rome. Cantabrian Wars: Rome deployed some eighty thousand soldiers against the Cantabri in Iberia. 27 BC 16 January The Senate granted Augustus the titles augustus, majestic, and princeps, first. 25 BC Augustus indicated his nephew Marcus Claudius Marcellus (Julio-Claudian dynasty) as his chosen successor by marrying him to his only daughter Julia the Elder. The Roman client Amyntas of Galatia died. Augustus organized his territory as the province of Galatia. 24 BC Augustus' campaigns against the Cantabrians in Hispania Tarraconensis, the Cantabrian Wars, ended. 23 BC Coinage reform of Augustus: Augustus centralized the minting of and reformed the composition and value of the Roman currency. Marcellus died. 21 BC Augustus married Julia to his general Marcus Vipsanius Agrippa. 19 BC Cantabrian Wars: The last major combat operations ended. The Cantabri and Astures were pacified. 17 BC Augustus adopted the sons of Agrippa and Julia, his grandsons Gaius Caesar and Lucius Caesar, as his own sons. 16 BC Raetia and Noricum were conquered and annexed to Rome. 12 BC Germanic Wars: Roman forces crossed the Rhine into Germania. Agrippa died of fever. 11 BC Augustus married Julia to his general and stepson Tiberius. 9 BC The Roman general Nero Claudius Drusus died from injuries sustained falling from a horse. Pannonia was annexed and incorporated into Illyricum. 6 BC Augustus offered Tiberius tribunician power and imperium over the eastern half of the Empire. Tiberius refused, announcing his retirement to Rhodes. 2 BC Augustus was acclaimed Pater Patriae, father of the country, by the Senate.[5] Augustus convicted Julia of adultery and treason, annulled her marriage to Tiberius, and exiled her with her mother Scribonia to Ventotene. Centuries: 1st · 2nd · 3rd · 4th · 5th · 6th · 7th · 8th · 9th · 10th · 11th · 12th · 13th · 14th · 15th 1st century Year Date Event AD 2 20 August Lucius Caesar died of a sudden illness. Augustus allowed Tiberius to return to Rome as a private citizen. AD 4 21 February Gaius Caesar died in Lycia from wounds suffered in battle. Augustus adopted Tiberius as his son and granted him tribunician power. AD 6 Augustus deposed Herod Archelaus, ethnarch in Samaria, Judea and Idumea, and organized the province of Judea on his territories. Bellum Batonianum: The Daesitiates, an Illyrian people, rose up against Roman authority in Illyricum. AD 9 Bellum Batonianum: The Daesitiate chieftain Bato (Daesitiate chieftain) surrendered to Roman forces. September Battle of the Teutoburg Forest: A coalition of Germanic forces ambushed and destroyed three Roman legions in the Teutoburg Forest. Publius Quinctilius Varus, the commander of Roman forces in Germania, committed suicide. AD 10 Tiberius assumed command of Roman forces in Germania. Illyricum was divided into the provinces of Pannonia and Dalmatia. AD 13 Tiberius was granted power equal to Augustus as co-princeps. AD 14 19 August Augustus died. Germanicus, son of Nero Claudius Drusus and adoptive son of Tiberius, was appointed commander of Roman forces in Germania. Germanicus and Tiberius's natural son Drusus Julius Caesar were sent to suppress mutinies in Germania and Pannonia, respectively. AD 15 Lucius Seius Strabo was appointed governor of Egypt. His son Sejanus remained as the sole prefect of the Praetorian Guard. AD 16 Battle of the Weser River: A Roman army led by Germanicus decisively defeated a Germanic force on the Weser. AD 17 Archelaus of Cappadocia, king in Cappadocia and a Roman client, died. Tiberius annexed his territory, organizing it as the province of Cappadocia. Antiochus III of Commagene, king of Commagene and a Roman client, died. Tiberius annexed his territory to the province of Syria. AD 18 Tiberius granted Germanicus imperium over the eastern half of the Empire. AD 19 10 October Germanicus died in Antioch, possibly after being poisoned on Tiberius's orders. AD 22 Tiberius granted Drusus Julius Caesar tribunician power, marking him as his choice as successor. AD 23 14 September Drusus Julius Caesar died, possibly after being poisoned by Sejanus or his wife Livilla. AD 26 Tiberius retired to Capri, leaving Sejanus in control of Rome through his office. AD 28 The Frisii hanged their Roman tax collectors and expelled the governor. AD 29 Livia, Augustus's widow and Tiberius's mother, died. AD 31 18 October Sejanus was executed on Tiberius's orders. Tiberius invited Germanicus's son Caligula to join him on Capri. AD 37 16 March Tiberius died. His will left his offices jointly to Caligula and Drusus Julius Caesar's son, his grandson Tiberius Gemellus. AD 38 Tiberius Gemellus was murdered on Caligula's orders. AD 40 Ptolemy of Mauretania, king of Mauretania and a Roman client, was murdered on Caligula's orders during a state visit to Rome. His slave Aedemon rose in revolt against Roman rule. AD 41 The general Gaius Suetonius Paulinus was appointed to suppress the rebellion in Mauretania. 24 January Caligula was assassinated by the centurion Cassius Chaerea. The Praetorian Guard acclaimed Nero Claudius Drusus's son Claudius princeps. Claudius restored the Judean monarchy under king Herod Agrippa. AD 42 The territory of the former Mauretania was organized into the provinces of Mauretania Caesariensis and Mauretania Tingitana. AD 43 Roman conquest of Britain: The senator Aulus Plautius led four legions into Great Britain in support of king Verica of the Atrebates. Claudius annexed Lycia into the Empire as a province. AD 46 The Odrysian king Rhoemetalces III, a Roman client, was killed by anti-Roman insurgents. Odrysia was incorporated into the Empire as the province of Thracia. AD 48 Claudius's wife Messalina was executed for conspiracy. Claudius appointed Herod Agrippa's son Herod Agrippa II king of Judea. AD 49 Claudius married his niece, Germanicus's daughter Agrippina the Younger. AD 50 Claudius adopted Agrippina's son Nero as his own son. AD 54 13 October Claudius died. Nero succeeded him as princeps. AD 55 11 February Claudius's young natural son Britannicus died, probably by poison. AD 58 Roman–Parthian War of 58–63: Roman forces attacked Armenia in support of their preferred king Tigranes VI of Armenia against the Parthian candidate Tiridates I of Armenia. AD 59 23 March Agrippina died, probably murdered by her son Nero. AD 60 Boudica, a queen of the Iceni, was appointed to lead a revolt of the Iceni and the Trinovantes against Rome. AD 61 Battle of Watling Street: Some eighty thousand soldiers and civilians among the Iceni and Trinovantes were killed, probably in the modern West Midlands, ending Boudica's revolt. AD 63 Roman–Parthian War of 58–63: The Roman and Parthian Empires agreed that Tiridates and his descendants would remain kings of Armenia as Roman clients, ending the war. AD 64 18 July Great Fire of Rome: A fire began which would cause massive property damage and loss of life over six days in Rome. Nero began construction of his large and extravagant villa the Domus Aurea. AD 65 19 April Pisonian conspiracy: Nero was informed of a broad conspiracy to assassinate him and appoint the senator Gaius Calpurnius Piso leader of Rome. AD 66 First Jewish–Roman War: The Jewish population of Judea revolted against Roman rule. AD 68 9 June Nero, then in hiding in the villa of the freedman Phaon (freedman), was notified that the Senate had declared him an enemy of the state and ordered him brought to the Forum to be publicly beaten to death. He ordered his secretary Epaphroditos to kill him. The Senate accepted Galba, governor of Hispania Tarraconensis, as ruler of Rome. Zealot Temple Siege: The forces of Ananus ben Ananus, the Jewish former High Priest of Israel, laid siege to the Zealots in the Second Temple. AD 69 15 January The Praetorian Guard assassinated Galba and acclaimed Otho ruler of Rome. 16 April Following his defeat by Vitellius, the commander of the Roman army on the lower Rhine, near modern Calvatone, and to prevent further civil war, Otho committed suicide. Revolt of the Batavi: Gaius Julius Civilis, commander of the Batavi auxiliaries in the Rhine legions, turned against Rome. December The Senate recognized Vespasian, the commander of Roman forces in Egypt and Judea, as ruler of Rome. 22 December Vitellius was executed in Rome by troops loyal to Vespasian. AD 70 Revolt of the Batavi: Following a series of battlefield reversals, Civilis accepted peace terms from the Roman general Quintus Petillius Cerialis. September Siege of Jerusalem (70 CE): The Roman general Titus breached the walls of Jerusalem, sacked the city and destroyed the Second Temple. AD 71 Roman conquest of Britain: Roman forces entered modern Scotland. AD 73 16 April Siege of Masada: Roman forces breached the walls of Masada, a mountain fortress held by the Jewish extremist sect the Sicarii. AD 77 Gnaeus Julius Agricola was appointed consul and governor of Britain. AD 79 23 June Vespasian died. He was succeeded by his son Titus. 24 August Eruption of Mount Vesuvius in 79: Mount Vesuvius erupted, destroying the cities of Pompeii and Herculaneum. AD 80 Rome was partially destroyed by fire. March The Colosseum was completed. AD 81 13 September Titus died of fever. He was succeeded by his younger brother Domitian. AD 85 Agricola was recalled to Rome. AD 86 Domitian's Dacian War: The Dacian king Decebalus invaded Moesia. AD 88 Domitian's Dacian War: Decebalus agreed to return all Roman prisoners of war and accept his status as a Roman client in exchange for an annual subsidy of eight million sestertii, ending the war. AD 89 1 January Lucius Antonius Saturninus, governor of Germania Superior, revolted against Domitian's rule. Saturninus was executed. AD 96 18 September Domitian was assassinated by members of the royal household. Nerva was declared ruler of Rome by the Senate. AD 97 Nerva adopted the general and former consul Trajan as his son. AD 98 27 January Nerva died. Trajan succeeded him. 2nd century Year Date Event 101 First Dacian War: Rome invaded Dacia. September Second Battle of Tapae: Dacian forces retreated from contact with the Romans at Tapae. 102 First Dacian War: The Dacian king Decebalus reaffirmed his loyalty to Rome, ending the war. 105 Second Dacian War: Trajan responded to the resumption of raids on Roman settlements in Moesia by invading Dacia. 106 Battle of Sarmisegetusa: Roman forces breached the Dacian capital Sarmizegetusa Regia. The Dacian king Decebalus escaped to the east. The Nabatean king Rabbel II Soter died. 22 March Nabatea was annexed to the Roman empire as the province of Arabia Petraea. Second Dacian War: The Dacian king Decebalus committed suicide in his fortification at Ranisstorum to avoid capture. 107 The province of Dacia was organized. 112 Trajan's Forum was inaugurated. 113 Roman–Parthian Wars: Trajan launched an expedition against Parthia. Trajan's Column was erected in Trajan's Forum to commemorate the victory over Dacia. 114 Trajan deposed the Armenian king Parthamasiris of Armenia, a Roman client, and organized the province of Armenia on his territory. 115 Kitos War: The Jews in Cyrene rose up against Roman authority. 116 The provinces of Mesopotamia and Assyria were organized on territory conquered from Parthia. Trajan captured the Parthian capital Ctesiphon and deposed its shah Osroes I in favor of his son Parthamaspates of Parthia. 117 Kitos War: Roman forces captured the rebel stronghold of Lod and executed many of its inhabitants. 8 August Trajan died. 10 August The Senate accepted the general Hadrian as ruler of Rome, following the appearance of documents indicating he had been adopted by Trajan. Osroes I deposed his son Parthamaspates of Parthia and replaced him as shah of Parthia. 118 Hadrian withdrew from the territories of Armenia, Assyria and Mesopotamia, allowing the return of their respective client monarchies. 119 A rebellion took place in Britain. 122 The construction of Hadrian's Wall at the northern border of Britain began. 123 Hadrian arrived in Mauretania to suppress a local revolt. 124 Hadrian travelled to Greece. 126 Hadrian returned to Rome. The rebuilt Pantheon was dedicated to Agrippa, its original builder. 132 Bar Kokhba revolt: Simon bar Kokhba, believed by his followers to be the Messiah, launched a revolt against Roman authority in Judea. 135 Bar Kokhba revolt: The revolt ended at a cost of tens of thousands of Roman soldiers and some six hundred thousand Jewish rebels and civilians, including bar Kokhba, killed. Judea and Syria were combined into the single province of Syria Palaestina. 136 Hadrian adopted Lucius Aelius as his son and successor. 138 1 January Lucius Aelius died. 25 February Hadrian adopted Antoninus Pius as his son and successor and granted him tribunician power and imperium, on the condition that he in turn adopt Marcus Aurelius and Lucius Verus as his sons. 10 July Hadrian died, probably from congestive heart failure. 11 July Antoninus succeeded Hadrian. 141 Roman conquest of Britain: Roman forces invaded modern Scotland under the command of the British governor Quintus Lollius Urbicus. 142 The construction of the Antonine Wall at the northern border of Britain began. 161 7 March Antoninus died. He was succeeded by Marcus and Lucius Verus. Roman–Parthian War of 161–166: The Parthian Empire deposed the Armenian king Sohaemus of Armenia, a Roman client, and installed Bakur. 165 Antonine Plague: A pandemic, probably of smallpox or measles, began which would kill some five million people throughout the Roman Empire. 166 Roman–Parthian War of 161–166: Roman forces sacked the Parthian capital Ctesiphon. 169 Lucius Verus died of disease, leaving Marcus the sole ruler of Rome. Marcomannic Wars: A coalition of Germanic tribes led by the Marcomanni invaded the Roman Empire across the Danube. 175 Marcomannic Wars: Rome and the Iazyges signed a treaty under which the latter agreed to return Roman prisoners of war and supply troops to the Auxilia, ending the war. 177 Marcus named his natural son Commodus co-ruler with himself. 180 17 March Marcus died. Antonine Plague: The pandemic ended. 184 The Antonine Wall was abandoned by Roman forces. 192 31 December Commodus was strangled to death. 193 1 January The Praetorian Guard acclaimed the consul Pertinax ruler of Rome at the Castra Praetoria. 28 March Pertinax was assassinated by the Praetorian Guard. The Praetorian Guard acclaimed the former consul Didius Julianus, who had provided the highest bid, ruler of Rome. 9 April Pescennius Niger, the legatus Augusti pro praetore of Syria Palaestina, was proclaimed ruler of Rome by his legions. 14 April The Legio XIV Gemina acclaimed its commander Septimius Severus ruler of Rome at Carnuntum. May The Senate recognized Septimius Severus as ruler of Rome and sentenced Julianus to death. 194 Battle of Issus (194): Niger's forces were decisively defeated by the armies of Septimius Severus at Issus. 196 Clodius Albinus, the commander of Roman troops in Britain and Iberia, took the title Imperator Caesar Decimus Clodius Septimius Albinus Augustus. 197 19 February Battle of Lugdunum: Septimius Severus and Albinus met in battle at Lugdunum. Albinus committed suicide or was killed. Roman–Parthian Wars: Septimius Severus sacked the Parthian capital Ctesiphon. 198 Septimius Severus appointed his eldest natural son Caracalla co-ruler with himself. 3rd century Year Date Event 208 Roman invasion of Caledonia 208–210: Septimius Severus invaded modern Scotland. 209 Septimius Severus named his youngest natural son Publius Septimius Geta co-ruler with himself and Caracalla. 211 4 February Septimius Severus died. Roman invasion of Caledonia 208–210: Caracalla ended the campaign. 26 December Geta was murdered in his mother's arms by members of the Praetorian Guard loyal to Caracalla. 212 Constitutio Antoniniana was an edict issued by Caracalla declaring that all free men in the Roman Empire were to be given full Roman citizenship and that all free women in the Empire were to be given the same rights as Roman men. 217 8 April Caracalla was assassinated by a member of his bodyguard. The Praetorian Guard acclaimed their prefect Macrinus ruler of Rome. 218 8 June Macrinus was captured and executed by an army loyal to Elagabalus, supposedly the illegitimate son of Caracalla. 222 11 March Elagabalus was assassinated by the Praetorian Guard, which installed his young cousin Severus Alexander as ruler of Rome. 230 Roman–Persian Wars: The Sasanian shah Ardashir I invaded Mesopotamia and Syria. 232 Roman–Persian Wars: Alexander repelled the Sasanian invasion. 235 19 March Alexander was killed in a mutiny of the Legio XXII Primigenia at Mainz. 20 March The army elected Maximinus Thrax, commander of the Legio IV Italica, ruler of Rome. 238 22 March Gordian I, governor of Africa, accepted the rule of Rome at the urging of rebels in his province. He appointed his son Gordian II to rule jointly with him. 2 April The Senate accepted Gordian I and Gordian II as rulers of Rome. Battle of Carthage (238): Forces loyal to Gordian I and Gordian II were defeated by the army of Capelianus, the governor of Numidia, who claimed fealty to Maximinus. Gordian II was killed. Gordian I committed suicide. 22 April The Senate elected two senators, Pupienus and Balbinus, as joint rulers of the Empire. Facing popular opposition to Pupienus and Balbinus, the Senate gave Gordian I's young grandson Gordian III the title Caesar. May Maximinus was murdered with his son during a mutiny of the Legio II Parthica at Aquileia. 29 July Pupienus and Balbinus were tortured and murdered by the Praetorian Guard in their barracks. 243 Battle of Resaena: Roman forces defeated the Sasanian Empire at Resaena. 244 Battle of Misiche: The Sasanian Empire decisively defeated a Roman force at Misiche, near modern Fallujah. Gordian III was killed, probably by a fellow Roman. He was succeeded by Philip the Arab, the prefect of the Praetorian Guard, who was forced to cede Mesopotamia and Armenia to the Sasanian Empire. 249 Philip was killed at Verona in battle with Decius, commander of Roman forces in Pannonia and Moesia. 251 Decius appointed his natural son Herennius Etruscus co-ruler of Rome jointly with himself. Battle of Abritus: Roman forces were dealt a bloody defeat by the Goths near modern Razgrad. Decius and Herennius were killed. The armies of the Danube region acclaimed their commander Trebonianus Gallus ruler of Rome. The Senate recognized Decius's son Hostilian as ruler of Rome. Gallus adopted Hostilian as his son. Plague of Cyprian: Hostilian died, probably of plague. Gallus appointed his natural son Volusianus co-ruler jointly with himself. 253 Battle of Barbalissos: A Sasanian force destroyed a Roman army at Barbalissos. August Gallus and Volusianus were killed in a mutiny at Terni. The army acclaimed Aemilianus, governor of Pannonia and Moesia, ruler of Rome. Aemilianus was killed by his own soldiers in the face of the army of the general Valerian (emperor). 22 October Valerian gave his son Gallienus the title Caesar. 256 The Sasanian Empire conquered and sacked Antioch. 257 Valerian reconquered Antioch. 258 The Goths invaded Asia Minor. 260 Death of Dacian king Regalianus that became Roman emperor for a brief period. 260 Valerian was taken prisoner by the Sasanian Empire during truce negotiations. September The general Postumus was declared ruler of Rome in the Gallic Empire. 264 Valerian died in captivity. 267 Odaenathus, the king of Palmyra and a Roman client, was assassinated. His widow Zenobia took power as regent for their son Vaballathus. 268 Gallienus was murdered by his soldiers during a siege of Pontirolo Nuovo. September The general Claudius Gothicus was declared ruler of Rome by his soldiers. 269 Postumus was killed by his soldiers, who in turn acclaimed one of their own, Marcus Aurelius Marius, emperor of the Gallic Empire. Marius was murdered by Victorinus, formerly prefect of Postumus's Praetorian Guard, who replaced him as emperor of the Gallic Empire. Zenobia conquered Egypt. Battle of Naissus: Roman forces decisively defeated the Goths at modern Niš, stalling an invasion of the Balkans. 270 January Claudius Gothicus died. He was succeeded by his brother Quintillus. April Quintillus died at Aquileia. September Aurelian became ruler of Rome. 271 Battle of Fano: A Roman force defeated the Juthungi on the Metauro. Victorinus was murdered by an officer he had cuckolded. Tetricus I, praeses of Gallia Aquitania was acclaimed emperor of the Gallic Empire. He appointed his natural son Tetricus II to rule jointly with him. 272 Zenobia was arrested en route to refuge in the Sasanian Empire. 273 Palmyra rebelled against Roman authority and was destroyed. 274 Battle of Châlons (274): Aurelian defeated the forces of Tetricus I and Tetricus II at modern Châlons-en-Champagne. 275 September Aurelian was murdered by the Praetorian Guard. 25 September The Senate elected Tacitus (emperor) ruler of Rome. 276 June Tacitus died. Marcus Aurelius Probus, commander of Roman forces in the east and Tacitus's half-brother, was acclaimed ruler of Rome by his troops. Florianus, prefect of the Praetorian Guard and commander of Roman forces in the west, was acclaimed ruler of Rome by his troops. September Florianus was assassinated near Tarsus by his troops following a defeat at the hands of Probus. 279 Probus launched a campaign against the Vandals in Illyricum. 282 The Praetorian Guard elected their prefect Carus ruler of Rome. Probus was assassinated. Carus gave his sons Carinus and Numerian the title Caesar. 283 Carus died. 284 Numerian died. 20 November Roman forces in the east elected the consul Diocletian their ruler and proclaimed him augustus. 285 July Battle of the Margus: Forces loyal to Diocletian defeated Carinus in battle on the Morava. Carinus was killed. July Diocletian gave Maximian the title Caesar. 286 Carausian Revolt: The naval commander Carausius declared himself emperor in Britain and northern Gaul. 2 April Diocletian proclaimed Maximian augustus of the west, ruling himself as augustus of the east. 293 Diocletian established the Tetrarchy, appointing Constantius Chlorus to hold the office of Caesar under Maximian in the west and Galerius to hold the title under himself in the east. Carausian Revolt: Constantius Chlorus conquered Carausius's Gallic territories. Carausius was murdered by his finance minister Allectus, who replaced him as emperor in Britain. 296 Carausian Revolt: Allectus was defeated in battle and killed at Calleva Atrebatum. 4th century Year Date Event 301 Diocletian issued the Edict on Maximum Prices, reforming the currency and setting price ceilings on a number of goods. 303 24 February Diocletianic Persecution: Diocletian issued his first edict against Christians, calling for the destruction of Christian holy books and places of worship and stripping Christians of their government positions and political rights. 305 1 May Diocletian and Maximian abdicated. Constantius and Galerius were elevated to augusti in the west and east. Galerius appointed Flavius Valerius Severus Caesar in the west and Maximinus II Caesar in the east. 306 25 July Constantius died at Eboracum. By his dying wish, his troops acclaimed his son Constantine the Great augustus. Galerius recognized Flavius Valerius Severus as augustus in the west and granted Constantine the Great the lesser title of Caesar, which he accepted. Civil wars of the Tetrarchy: Rioters in Rome acclaimed Maximian's son Maxentius ruler of Rome. He took the title princeps invictus, undefeated prince. Maxentius invited Maximian to reclaim the title augustus. 307 Civil wars of the Tetrarchy: Flavius Valerius Severus surrendered to Maximian at Ravenna. Civil wars of the Tetrarchy: Galerius laid siege to Rome. Many of his soldiers defected to Maxentius and he was forced to flee. 308 Civil wars of the Tetrarchy: After a failed coup against his son Maxentius, Maximian was forced to flee to Constantine's court. 11 November Maximian resigned as augustus. Galerius appointed Licinius augustus of the west and confirmed his recognition of Constantine the Great as Caesar of the west. 310 July Civil wars of the Tetrarchy: Maximian was forced to commit suicide following a failed coup against Constantine the Great. 311 May Galerius died. Licinius and Maximinus agreed to divide the eastern Empire between themselves. Civil wars of the Tetrarchy: Constantine the Great concluded an alliance with Licinius, offering his half-sister Flavia Julia Constantia to him in marriage. Civil wars of the Tetrarchy: Maximinus entered a secret alliance with Maxentius. 3 December Diocletian died, possibly from suicide. 312 28 October Battle of the Milvian Bridge: Constantine the Great had a vision of the cross appearing over the sun at the Ponte Milvio with the words "in this sign, conquer." His forces defeated and killed Maxentius. 313 February Constantine the Great and Licinius issued the Edict of Milan, providing for restitution to Christians injured during the persecutions. March Licinius married Constantia. 30 April Battle of Tzirallum: Licinius defeated a vastly numerically superior force loyal to Maximinus at modern Çorlu. Maximinus fled to Nicomedia. August Maximinus died at Tarsus. 314 8 October Battle of Cibalae: Constantine the Great dealt a bloody defeat to Licinius's forces at modern Vinkovci. 317 Battle of Mardia: After a bloody battle, probably at modern Harmanli, Licinius retreated from contact with Constantine the Great. 1 March Licinius recognized Constantine the Great as his superior, ceded all his territories outside of Thrace, and agreed to depose and execute Valerius Valens, whom he had raised to augustus. 324 3 July Battle of Adrianople (324): Licinius suffered a bloody defeat at the hands of Constantine the Great on the Maritsa. 18 September Battle of Chrysopolis: Constantine the Great dealt a decisive defeat to the remnants of Licinius's army. Licinius surrendered. 325 20 May First Council of Nicaea: An ecumenical council called by Constantine the Great at Nicaea opened which would establish the Nicene Creed, asserting Jesus to be equal to and of the same substance as God the Father. Licinius was executed. 326 Constantine the Great ordered the death of his oldest son Crispus. 330 11 May Constantine the Great moved his capital to Byzantium and renamed the city Constantinople, city of Constantine. 332 Constantine the Great campaigned against the Goths. 334 Constantine the Great campaigned against the Sarmatians. 337 Roman–Persian Wars: The Sasanian shah Shapur II invaded Armenia and Mesopotamia. 22 May Constantine the Great died. 9 September Constantine the Great's three sons declared themselves augusti and divided their father's empire into three parts, with Constantine II (emperor) receiving Britain, Iberia, Gaul and Illyria, Constantius II Asia, Syria Palaestina and Egypt, and Constans Italy and Africa. The young Constans was placed under Constantine II's guardianship. 338 Constantine II campaigned against the Alemanni. Constantine II granted Illyria to his brother Constans. 340 Constantine II invaded Italy. He was ambushed and slain at Aquileia by Constans, who inherited his territory. 341 Constans and Constantius II issued a ban against pagan sacrifice. 344 Siege of Singara: Sasanian forces failed to capture the Roman fortress of Singara. 350 18 January Magnentius, commander of the Jovians and Herculians, was acclaimed ruler of Rome by his legions. Constans was killed in Elne by followers of Magnentius. 3 June Constantius Chlorus's grandson Nepotianus entered Rome with a band of gladiators and there declared himself imperator. 30 June Marcellinus (magister officiorum), one of Magnentius's generals, entered Rome and executed Nepotianus. 351 15 March Constantius II granted his cousin Constantius Gallus the title Caesar. 28 September Battle of Mursa Major: Constantius II defeated Magnentius in a bloody battle in the valley of the Drava. 353 Battle of Mons Seleucus: Constantius II dealt Magnentius a decisive defeat at modern La Bâtie-Montsaléon. Magnentius committed suicide. 354 Gallus was put to death. 355 6 November Constantius II declared Julian (emperor) Caesar and granted him command in Gaul. 357 Battle of Strasbourg: Julian defeated a vastly superior Alemanni force near Argentoratum, solidifying Roman control west of the Rhine. 360 February The Petulantes, ordered east from Paris in preparation for a war with the Sasanian Empire, instead mutinied and proclaimed Julian augustus. 361 3 November Constantius II named Julian as his successor before dying of fever. 363 5 March Julian's Persian War: Roman forces embarked from Antioch on a punitive expedition against the Sasanian Empire. 26 June Battle of Samarra: Sasanian forces harassed a Roman army in retreat at Samarra from a failed siege of their capital Ctesiphon. Julian was killed. 27 June Julian's army declared one of their generals, Jovian (emperor), augustus. July Julian's Persian War: Jovian agreed to cede the five provinces east of the Tigris to the Sasanian Empire, ending the war. 364 17 February Jovian died. 26 February The army acclaimed the general Valentinian I the Great augustus. 28 March Valentinian the Great appointed his younger brother Valens augustus with rule over the eastern Empire, and continued as augustus in the west. 375 17 November Valentinian the Great died of a stroke. His son Gratian, then junior augustus in the west, succeeded him as senior augustus. 22 November The army acclaimed Valentinian the Great's young son Valentinian II augustus of the west. 376 Fleeing Hunnic aggression, the Goths, under the leadership of the Thervingi chieftain Fritigern, crossed the Danube and entered the eastern Empire as political refugees. Gothic War (376–382): Following the deaths of several Roman soldiers during civil unrest in Thrace, the officer Lupicinus (Roman) arrested Fritigern and the Greuthungi chieftain Alatheus. 378 9 August Battle of Adrianople: A combined Gothic-Alanic force decisively defeated the Roman army near Edirne. Valens was killed. 379 19 January Gratian named the general Theodosius I the Great augustus in the east. 380 27 February Theodosius the Great issued the Edict of Thessalonica, making Christianity the state church of the Roman Empire. 382 3 October Gothic War (376–382): The Goths were made foederati of Rome and granted land and autonomy in Thrace, ending the war. 383 25 August Gratian was delivered by mutineers to the Magister equitum Andragathius and executed. 392 15 May Valentinian II was found hanged in his residence. He may have been murdered by his guardian, the Frankish general Arbogast. 22 August Arbogast declared Eugenius augustus and ruler in the west. 393 23 January Theodosius the Great appointed his younger son Honorius (emperor) augustus in the west. 394 6 September Battle of the Frigidus: Forces loyal to Theodosius the Great defeated and killed Arbogast and Eugenius, probably near the Vipava. 395 17 January Theodosius the Great died. His elder son Arcadius succeeded him as augustus in the eastern Byzantine Empire. The young Honorius became sole augustus in the Western Roman Empire under the regency of Magister militum Stilicho. 398 Gildonic War: Gildo, comes of Africa, was killed following a failed rebellion against the Western Roman Empire. 5th century Year Date Event 402 The capital of the Western Roman Empire was moved to Ravenna. 406 31 December Crossing of the Rhine: A coalition of foreign tribes including the Vandals, Alans and Suebi invaded the Western Roman Empire across the Rhine. 408 1 May Arcadius died. 410 24 August Sack of Rome (410): Rome was sacked by the Visigoths under their king Alaric I. End of Roman rule in Britain: The last Roman forces left Britain. 421 8 February Honorius appointed his brother-in-law and Magister militum Constantius III co-ruler of the Western Roman Empire with himself. 2 September Constantius III died. 423 15 August Honorius died. The Western Roman patrician Castinus declared the primicerius Joannes augustus. 424 23 October The Byzantine augustus Theodosius II the Younger, the Calligrapher named the young Valentinian III, his cousin and Constantius III's son, Caesar with rule over the west. His mother Galla Placidia was appointed regent. 425 Joannes was executed in Aquileia. 447 Battle of the Utus: The Huns under Attila defeated a Byzantine army in a bloody battle near the Vit. 450 28 July Theodosius the Younger died in a riding accident. 452 Attila abandoned his invasion of Italy following a meeting at the Mincio with the pope Pope Leo I. 455 16 March Valentinian III was assassinated on orders of the senator Petronius Maximus. 17 March The Senate acclaimed Maximus augustus of the Western Roman Empire. 31 May Maximus was killed by a mob as he attempted to flee Rome in the face of a Vandal advance. 2 June Sack of Rome (455): The Vandals entered and began to sack Rome. 9 July The Magister militum Avitus was pronounced augustus of the Western Roman Empire at Toulouse by the Visigothic king Theodoric II. 456 17 October Avitus was forced to flee Rome following a military coup by the general Ricimer and the domesticus Majorian. 457 Avitus died. 27 January The Byzantine augustus Marcian died. 28 February The Byzantine augustus Leo I the Thracian appointed Majorian Magister militum in the west. 1 April The army acclaimed Majorian augustus of the Western Roman Empire. 461 7 August Majorian was killed after torture near the Staffora on Ricimer's orders. 19 November The Senate elected Libius Severus from among their number as augustus of the Western Roman Empire. 465 15 August Severus died. 467 12 April Leo the Thracian elevated the comes Anthemius to Caesar with rule over the Western Roman Empire. 468 Battle of Cap Bon (468): The Vandal Kingdom destroyed a combined Western Roman and Byzantine invasion fleet at Cap Bon. 472 11 July Anthemius was killed in flight following Ricimer's conquest of Rome. Maximus's son Olybrius was acclaimed augustus of the Western Roman Empire. 18 August Ricimer died. Ricimer's nephew Gundobad succeeded him as Magister militum and took the title Patrician. Olybrius died. 473 3 March The Germanic elements of the army elected the domesticus Glycerius augustus of the Western Roman Empire. Gundobad relinquished his Western Roman titles to succeed his father as king of Burgundy. 474 Leo the Thracian appointed Julius Nepos, his nephew and governor of Dalmatia, ruler of the Western Roman Empire in opposition to Glycerius. 18 January Leo the Thracian died. He was succeeded by his grandson Leo II (emperor). 9 February Zeno (emperor) became co-augustus of the Byzantine Empire with his young son Leo II. July Nepos deposed Glycerius. 17 November Leo II died, possibly after being poisoned by his mother Ariadne (empress). 475 January Zeno was forced to flee Constantinople for his homeland Isauria in the face of a popular revolt. 9 January Basiliscus, brother of Leo the Thracian's widow Verina, was acclaimed augustus of the Byzantine Empire by the Byzantine Senate. Nepos appointed Orestes (father of Romulus Augustulus) Magister militum and commander-in-chief of the Western Roman military. 28 August Orestes took control of the Western Roman capital Ravenna, forcing Nepos to flee to Dalmatia. 31 October Orestes declared his young son Romulus Augustulus augustus of the Western Roman Empire. 476 August Zeno recaptured Constantinople and accepted Basiliscus's surrender. 23 August Germanic foederati under the command of the general Odoacer renounced Western Roman authority and declared Odoacer their king. 28 August Odoacer captured and executed Orestes at Piacenza. 4 September Odoacer conquered the Western Roman capital Ravenna, forced Romulus to abdicate and declared himself king of Italy. The Senate sent Zeno the imperial regalia of the Western Roman Empire. 480 25 April Nepos was murdered in his residence in Split. 491 9 April Zeno died. 6th century Year Date Event 518 9 July Augustus Anastasius I Dicorus died. 527 1 April Augustus Justin I appointed his older son Justinian I the Great co-augustus with himself. 1 August Justin I died. 529 7 April The Codex Justinianeus, which attempted to consolidate and reconcile contradictions in Roman law, was promulgated. 532 Justinian the Great ordered the construction of the Hagia Sophia in Constantinople. 533 21 June Vandalic War: A Byzantine force under the general Belisarius departed for the Vandal Kingdom. 13 September Battle of Ad Decimum: A Byzantine army defeated a Vandal force near Carthage. 15 December Battle of Tricamarum: The Byzantines defeated a Vandal army and forced their king Gelimer into flight. 534 March Vandalic War: Gelimer surrendered to Belisarius and accepted his offer of a peaceful retirement in Galatia, ending the war. The territory of the Vandal Kingdom was reorganized as the praetorian prefecture of Africa. 535 Gothic War (535–554): Byzantine forces crossing from Africa invaded Sicily, then an Ostrogothic possession. 536 December Gothic War (535–554): Byzantium took Rome with little Ostrogothic resistance. 537 27 December The Hagia Sophia was completed. 552 July Battle of Taginae: A Byzantine army dealt a decisive defeat to the Ostrogoths at Gualdo Tadino. The Ostrogoth king Totila was killed. 553 Battle of Mons Lactarius: An Ostrogothic force was ambushed and destroyed at Monti Lattari on its way to relieve a Byzantine siege of Cumae. The Ostrogoth king Teia was killed. 565 March Belisarius died. 14 November Justinian the Great died. 568 The Lombards invaded Italy. 573 The general Narses died. 574 Augustus Justin II began to suffer from fits of insanity. 578 5 October Justin II died. 582 14 August Augustus Tiberius II Constantine died. 7th century Year Date Event 602 Byzantine–Sasanian War of 602–628: The Sasanian Empire declared war on Byzantium. 607 1 August Augustus Phocas dedicated the Column of Phocas in the Roman Forum. 626 June Siege of Constantinople (626): Sasanian and Avar forces laid siege to Constantinople. 634 April Muslim conquest of the Levant: A Rashidun army departed Medina for the Levant. 640 January Muslim conquest of Egypt: A Rashidun force laid siege to Pelusium. The legions of the East Roman army were reorganized into themes. 641 8 November Siege of Alexandria (641): Byzantine authorities in the Egyptian capital Alexandria surrendered to the besieging Rashidun army. 663 Basileus Constans II visited Rome. 698 Battle of Carthage (698): An Umayyad siege and blockade of Carthage forced the retreat of Byzantine forces. The city was conquered and destroyed. 8th century Year Date Event 717 Siege of Constantinople (717–718): The Umayyad Caliphate besieges the city of Constantinople. 718 15 August Siege of Constantinople (717–718): The Umayyad Caliphate lifts the siege of Constantinople due to Famine, Disease and an unusually hard winter. 730 Basileus Leo III the Isaurian promulgated an edict forbidding the veneration of religious images, beginning the first Byzantine Iconoclasm. 787 23 October Second Council of Nicaea: An ecumenical council in Nicaea ended which endorsed the veneration of images, ending the first Byzantine Iconoclasm. 9th century Year Date Event 813 June A group of soldiers broke into the Church of the Holy Apostles and pleaded with the body of the iconoclast basileus Constantine V to restore the Empire, marking the beginning of the second Byzantine Iconoclasm. 843 The Byzantine regent Theodora (wife of Theophilos) restored the veneration of religious images, ending the second Byzantine Iconoclasm. 867 24 September Basileus Michael III was assassinated by his co-basileus Basil I, who became sole ruler of the Empire. 10th century Year Date Event 976 10 January Basileus John I Tzimiskes died. His co-basileus and nephew Basil II became sole ruler of the Empire. 11th century Year Date Event 1002 Byzantine conquest of Bulgaria: Byzantine forces invaded Bulgaria. 1014 29 July Battle of Kleidion: Basil dealt a decisive and bloody defeat to Bulgarian forces in the Belasica near Klyuch. 1018 Byzantine conquest of Bulgaria: The Bulgarian boyars accepted the establishment of the theme of Bulgaria on the territory of the former Empire, with significant autonomy for themselves. 1025 15 December Basil died. 1054 16 July East–West Schism: The papal legate Humbert of Silva Candida laid on the altar of Hagia Sophia a document proclaiming the excommunication of Michael I Cerularius, the patriarch of Constantinople. 1071 15 April Siege of Bari: Italo-Norman forces captured Bari, capital of the katepanikion of Italy. 26 August Battle of Manzikert: The Byzantine Empire was decisively defeated by a Seljuk force near Malazgirt. The basileus Romanos IV Diogenes was captured. 1081 1 April Nikephoros III Botaneiates was deposed and replaced as basileus by Alexios I Komnenos. 1091 29 April Battle of Levounion: The Byzantine army dealt a bloody defeat to a Pecheneg invasion force. 1097 19 June Siege of Nicaea: The Rum occupants of Nicaea surrendered to Byzantine and First Crusader forces. 1098 Following the conquest of Antioch, the First Crusader leader Bohemond I of Antioch declared himself prince of Antioch. 12th century Year Date Event 1118 15 August Reign of John II begins: Being considered the greatest Komnenoi emperor, he starts extensive damage control. 1122 Battle of Beroia: A Byzantine army wiped out the Pechenegs at Stara Zagora. 1124 War with Venice begins: Over the non-renewal of trading privileges by John II Komnenos. 1126 The war with Venice ends in defeat: The Venetian fleet ravaged the coasts of Greece, forcing the emperor to back down. 1127 Hungarians invade the Empire: Invaders go far south as Philippolis. 1129 Invading Hungarins are repelled 1136 John II launches his first serious campaign in the east. 1137 John II conquers the Armenian Kingdom of Cilicia. 1139 John II vassalizes the Principality of Antioch. 1143 Death of John II: his death marks the beginning of straight decline. 1146 Sack of Philomelion: Under the orders from Manuel I, before relocating the Christian population. 1167 8 July Battle of Sirmium: Byzantium decisively defeated a Hungarian force at Sirmium. 1176 17 September Battle of Myriokephalon: A Byzantine invasion force was ambushed and forced to retreat through a mountain pass by Rum near Lake Beyşehir. 1180 24 September Basileus Manuel I Komnenos died. 1185 26 October Uprising of Asen and Peter: A tax revolt began in Paristrion which would result in the establishment of the Second Bulgarian Empire. 13th century Year Date Event 1204 13 April Siege of Constantinople (1204): Fourth Crusaders breached and sacked Constantinople, deposed the basileus Alexios V Doukas and established the Latin Empire under their leader Baldwin I, Latin Emperor as Latin Emperor. Theodore I Laskaris was acclaimed basileus but forced to flee with his court to establish the Empire of Nicaea at Nicaea. April Alexios I of Trebizond, a grandson of the former basileus Andronikos I Komnenos, declared himself ruler of Trebizond. 1205 Michael I Komnenos Doukas, a descendant of Alexios I Komnenos, established himself as despot of Epirus. 1261 25 July The Nicaean ruler Michael VIII Palaiologos conquered Constantinople . 15 August Michael was crowned basileus in Constantinople along with his infant son Andronikos II Palaiologos. 14th century Year Date Event 1326 Byzantine–Ottoman Wars: The Ottoman Empire conquered Bursa. 1331 Byzantine–Ottoman Wars: The Ottoman Empire captured Nicaea. 1341 26 October Byzantine civil war of 1341–47: The regent John VI Kantakouzenos was declared basileus by his supporters in opposition to the young John V Palaiologos. 1347 8 February Byzantine civil war of 1341–47: John VI concluded an arrangement under which he would rule as senior basileus alongside John V for ten years. 15th century Year Date Event 1453 29 May Fall of Constantinople: Ottoman forces entered Constantinople. Basileus Constantine XI Palaiologos was killed. See also History of the Roman Empire References ^ Forsythe, Gary (2015). A Companion to Livy. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. pp. 313–329. ^ Forsythe, Gary (2015). A Companion to Livy. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. pp. 313–329. ^ Grant, Michael (1993). The History of Rome. Faber & Faber. p. 42. ^ "Oxford Reference - Answers with Authority". www.oxfordreference.com. Retrieved 2018-12-15. ^ Eck, Werner; translated by Deborah Lucas Schneider; new material by Sarolta A. Takács. (2003) The Age of Augustus. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing (hardcover, ISBN 0-631-22957-4; paperback, ISBN 0-631-22958-2). v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Timeline_of_Roman_history&oldid=995766253" Categories: Ancient Rome Ancient timelines Ancient Rome-related lists Hidden categories: Dynamic lists Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read View source View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Español Français Hrvatski Italiano ქართული Latina Nederlands Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча Português Română Русский Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 22 December 2020, at 19:55 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1270 ---- Roman navy - Wikipedia Roman navy From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Navy of ancient Rome Part of a series on the Military of ancient Rome 753 BC – AD 476 Structural history Army Unit types and ranks Decorations and punishments Legions Auxilia Generals Navy Fleets Admirals Campaign history Wars and battles Technological history Military engineering Castra Siege engines Triumphal arches Roads Political history   Strategy and tactics Infantry tactics Frontiers and fortifications Limes Limes Britannicus Antonine Wall Hadrian's Wall Saxon Shore Limes Germanicus Alb Limes Lauter Valley Limes Lower Germanic Limes Main Limes Neckar-Odenwald Limes Upper Germanic-Rhaetian Limes Wetterau Limes Danube–Iller–Rhine Limes Norican Limes Claustra Alpium Iuliarum Pannonian Limes Limes Alutanus Limes Moesiae Trajan's Wall Anastasian Wall Limes Sarmatiae Limes Arabicus Limes Tripolitanus Limes Mauretaniae  Ancient Rome portal •  War portal v t e The Roman navy (Latin: Classis, lit. 'fleet') comprised the naval forces of the ancient Roman state. The navy was instrumental in the Roman conquest of the Mediterranean Basin, but it never enjoyed the prestige of the Roman legions. Throughout their history, the Romans remained a primarily land-based people and relied partially on their more nautically inclined subjects, such as the Greeks and the Egyptians, to build their ships. Because of that, the navy was never completely embraced by the Roman state, and deemed somewhat "un-Roman".[1] In antiquity, navies and trading fleets did not have the logistical autonomy that modern ships and fleets possess, and unlike modern naval forces, the Roman navy even at its height never existed as an autonomous service but operated as an adjunct to the Roman army. During the course of the First Punic War, the Roman navy was massively expanded and played a vital role in the Roman victory and the Roman Republic's eventual ascension to hegemony in the Mediterranean Sea. In the course of the first half of the 2nd century BC, Rome went on to destroy Carthage and subdue the Hellenistic kingdoms of the eastern Mediterranean, achieving complete mastery of the inland sea, which they called Mare Nostrum. The Roman fleets were again prominent in the 1st century BC in the wars against the pirates, and in the civil wars that brought down the Republic, whose campaigns ranged across the Mediterranean. In 31 BC, the great naval Battle of Actium ended the civil wars culminating in the final victory of Augustus and the establishment of the Roman Empire. During the Imperial period, the Mediterranean became largely a peaceful "Roman lake". In the absence of a maritime enemy, the navy was reduced mostly to patrol, anti-piracy and transport duties.[2] By far, the navy's most vital task was to ensure Roman grain imports were shipped and delivered to the capital unimpeded across the Mediterranean. The navy also manned and maintained craft on major frontier rivers such as the Rhine and the Danube for supplying the army. On the fringes of the Empire, in new conquests or, increasingly, in defense against barbarian invasions, the Roman fleets were still engaged in open warfare. The decline of the Empire in the 3rd century took a heavy toll on the navy, which was reduced to a shadow of its former self, both in size and in combat ability. As successive waves of the Völkerwanderung crashed on the land frontiers of the battered Empire, the navy could only play a secondary role. In the early 5th century, the Roman frontiers were breached, and barbarian kingdoms appeared on the shores of the western Mediterranean. One of them, the Vandal Kingdom, raised a navy of its own and raided the shores of the Mediterranean, even sacking Rome, while the diminished Roman fleets were incapable of offering any resistance. The Western Roman Empire collapsed in the late 5th century. The navy of the surviving eastern Roman Empire is known as the Byzantine navy. Contents 1 History 1.1 Early Republic 1.1.1 First Punic War 1.1.2 Illyria and the Second Punic War 1.1.3 Operations in the East 1.2 Late Republic 1.2.1 Mithridates and the pirate threat 1.2.2 Caesar and the Civil Wars 1.3 Principate 1.3.1 Operations under Augustus 1.3.2 Julio-Claudian dynasty 1.3.3 Flavian, Antonine and Severan dynasties 1.3.4 3rd century crisis 1.4 Late antiquity 2 Organization 2.1 Crews 2.2 High Command 2.3 Ship types 2.4 Armament and tactics 2.5 Fleets 2.5.1 Principate period 2.5.1.1 Praetorian fleets 2.5.1.2 Provincial fleets 2.5.2 Dominate period 2.5.2.1 Fleets of the Danube frontier 2.5.2.2 Fleets in Western Europe 2.5.2.3 Fleets in the Eastern Mediterranean 2.6 Ports 3 See also 4 Notes 5 References 6 External links History[edit] Early Republic[edit] The exact origins of the Roman fleet are obscure. A traditionally agricultural and land-based society, the Romans rarely ventured out to sea, unlike their Etruscan neighbours.[3] There is evidence of Roman warships in the early 4th century BC, such as mention of a warship that carried an embassy to Delphi in 394 BC, but at any rate, the Roman fleet, if it existed, was negligible.[4] The traditional birth date of the Roman navy is set at ca. 311 BC, when, after the conquest of Campania, two new officials, the duumviri navales classis ornandae reficiendaeque causa, were tasked with the maintenance of a fleet.[5][6] As a result, the Republic acquired its first fleet, consisting of 20 ships, most likely triremes, with each duumvir commanding a squadron of 10 ships.[4][6] However, the Republic continued to rely mostly on her legions for expansion in Italy; the navy was most likely geared towards combating piracy and lacked experience in naval warfare, being easily defeated in 282 BC by the Tarentines.[6][7][8] This situation continued until the First Punic War: the main task of the Roman fleet was patrolling along the Italian coast and rivers, protecting seaborne trade from piracy. Whenever larger tasks had to be undertaken, such as the naval blockade of a besieged city, the Romans called on the allied Greek cities of southern Italy, the socii navales, to provide ships and crews.[9] It is possible that the supervision of these maritime allies was one of the duties of the four new praetores classici, who were established in 267 BC.[10] First Punic War[edit] The first Roman expedition outside mainland Italy was against the island of Sicily in 265 BC. This led to the outbreak of hostilities with Carthage, which would last until 241 BC. At the time, the Punic city was the unchallenged master of the western Mediterranean, possessing a long maritime and naval experience and a large fleet. Although Rome had relied on her legions for the conquest of Italy, operations in Sicily had to be supported by a fleet, and the ships available by Rome's allies were insufficient.[10] Thus in 261 BC, the Roman Senate set out to construct a fleet of 100 quinqueremes and 20 triremes.[9] According to Polybius, the Romans seized a shipwrecked Carthaginian quinquereme, and used it as a blueprint for their own ships.[11] The new fleets were commanded by the annually elected Roman magistrates, but naval expertise was provided by the lower officers, who continued to be provided by the socii, mostly Greeks. This practice was continued until well into the Empire, something also attested by the direct adoption of numerous Greek naval terms.[12][13] Three-banked ("trireme") Roman quinquereme with the Corvus boarding bridge. The use of the Corvus negated the superior Carthaginian naval expertise, and allowed the Romans to establish their naval superiority in the western Mediterranean. Despite the massive buildup, the Roman crews remained inferior in naval experience to the Carthaginians, and could not hope to match them in naval tactics, which required great maneuverability and experience. They, therefore, employed a novel weapon that transformed sea warfare to their advantage. They equipped their ships with the corvus, possibly developed earlier by the Syracusans against the Athenians. This was a long plank with a spike for hooking onto enemy ships. Using it as a boarding bridge, marines were able to board an enemy ship, transforming sea combat into a version of land combat, where the Roman legionaries had the upper hand. However, it is believed that the Corvus' weight made the ships unstable, and could capsize a ship in rough seas.[14] Although the first sea engagement of the war, the Battle of the Lipari Islands in 260 BC, was a defeat for Rome, the forces involved were relatively small. Through the use of the Corvus, the fledgling Roman navy under Gaius Duilius won its first major engagement later that year at the Battle of Mylae. During the course of the war, Rome continued to be victorious at sea: victories at Sulci (258 BC) and Tyndaris (257 BC) were followed by the massive Battle of Cape Ecnomus, where the Roman fleet under the consuls Marcus Atilius Regulus and Lucius Manlius inflicted a severe defeat on the Carthaginians. This string of successes allowed Rome to push the war further across the sea to Africa and Carthage itself. Continued Roman success also meant that their navy gained significant experience, although it also suffered a number of catastrophic losses due to storms, while conversely, the Carthaginian navy suffered from attrition.[14] The Battle of Drepana in 249 BC resulted in the only major Carthaginian sea victory, forcing the Romans to equip a new fleet from donations by private citizens. In the last battle of the war, at Aegates Islands in 241 BC, the Romans under Gaius Lutatius Catulus displayed superior seamanship to the Carthaginians, notably using their rams rather than the now-abandoned Corvus to achieve victory.[14] Illyria and the Second Punic War[edit] Roman as coin of the second half of the 3rd century BC, featuring the prow of a galley, most likely a quinquereme. Several similar issues are known, illustrating the importance of naval power during that period of Rome's history. After the Roman victory, the balance of naval power in the Western Mediterranean had shifted from Carthage to Rome.[15] This ensured Carthaginian acquiescence to the conquest of Sardinia and Corsica, and also enabled Rome to deal decisively with the threat posed by the Illyrian pirates in the Adriatic. The Illyrian Wars marked Rome's first involvement with the affairs of the Balkan peninsula.[16] Initially, in 229 BC, a fleet of 200 warships was sent against Queen Teuta, and swiftly expelled the Illyrian garrisons from the Greek coastal cities of modern-day Albania.[15] Ten years later, the Romans sent another expedition in the area against Demetrius of Pharos, who had rebuilt the Illyrian navy and engaged in piracy up into the Aegean. Demetrius was supported by Philip V of Macedon, who had grown anxious at the expansion of Roman power in Illyria.[17] The Romans were again quickly victorious and expanded their Illyrian protectorate, but the beginning of the Second Punic War (218–201 BC) forced them to divert their resources westwards for the next decades. Due to Rome's command of the seas, Hannibal, Carthage's great general, was forced to eschew a sea-borne invasion, instead choosing to bring the war over land to the Italian peninsula.[18] Unlike the first war, the navy played little role on either side in this war. The only naval encounters occurred in the first years of the war, at Lilybaeum (218 BC) and the Ebro River (217 BC), both resulting Roman victories. Despite an overall numerical parity, for the remainder of the war the Carthaginians did not seriously challenge Roman supremacy. The Roman fleet was hence engaged primarily with raiding the shores of Africa and guarding Italy, a task which included the interception of Carthaginian convoys of supplies and reinforcements for Hannibal's army, as well as keeping an eye on a potential intervention by Carthage's ally, Philip V.[19] The only major action in which the Roman fleet was involved was the siege of Syracuse in 214–212 BC with 130 ships under Marcus Claudius Marcellus. The siege is remembered for the ingenious inventions of Archimedes, such as mirrors that burned ships or the so-called "Claw of Archimedes", which kept the besieging army at bay for two years.[20] A fleet of 160 vessels was assembled to support Scipio Africanus' army in Africa in 202 BC, and, should his expedition fail, evacuate his men. In the event, Scipio achieved a decisive victory at Zama, and the subsequent peace stripped Carthage of its fleet.[21] Operations in the East[edit] A Roman naval bireme depicted in a relief from the Temple of Fortuna Primigenia in Praeneste (Palastrina),[22] which was built c. 120 BC;[23] exhibited in the Pius-Clementine Museum (Museo Pio-Clementino) in the Vatican Museums. Rome was now the undisputed master of the Western Mediterranean, and turned her gaze from defeated Carthage to the Hellenistic world. Small Roman forces had already been engaged in the First Macedonian War, when, in 214 BC, a fleet under Marcus Valerius Laevinus had successfully thwarted Philip V from invading Illyria with his newly built fleet. The rest of the war was carried out mostly by Rome's allies, the Aetolian League and later the Kingdom of Pergamon, but a combined Roman–Pergamene fleet of ca. 60 ships patrolled the Aegean until the war's end in 205 BC. In this conflict, Rome, still embroiled in the Punic War, was not interested in expanding her possessions, but rather in thwarting the growth of Philip's power in Greece. The war ended in an effective stalemate, and was renewed in 201 BC, when Philip V invaded Asia Minor. A naval battle off Chios ended in a costly victory for the Pergamene–Rhodian alliance, but the Macedonian fleet lost many warships, including its flagship, a deceres.[24] Soon after, Pergamon and Rhodes appealed to Rome for help, and the Republic was drawn into the Second Macedonian War. In view of the massive Roman naval superiority, the war was fought on land, with the Macedonian fleet, already weakened at Chios, not daring to venture out of its anchorage at Demetrias.[24] After the crushing Roman victory at Cynoscephalae, the terms imposed on Macedon were harsh, and included the complete disbandment of her navy. Almost immediately following the defeat of Macedon, Rome became embroiled in a war with the Seleucid Empire. This war too was decided mainly on land, although the combined Roman–Rhodian navy also achieved victories over the Seleucids at Myonessus and Eurymedon. These victories, which were invariably concluded with the imposition of peace treaties that prohibited the maintenance of anything but token naval forces, spelled the disappearance of the Hellenistic royal navies, leaving Rome and her allies unchallenged at sea. Coupled with the final destruction of Carthage, and the end of Macedon's independence, by the latter half of the 2nd century BC, Roman control over all of what was later to be dubbed mare nostrum ("our sea") had been established. Subsequently, the Roman navy was drastically reduced, depending on its Socii navales.[25] Late Republic[edit] Mithridates and the pirate threat[edit] Pompey the Great. His swift and decisive campaign against the pirates re-established Rome's control over the Mediterranean sea lanes. In the absence of a strong naval presence however, piracy flourished throughout the Mediterranean, especially in Cilicia, but also in Crete and other places, further reinforced by money and warships supplied by King Mithridates VI of Pontus, who hoped to enlist their aid in his wars against Rome.[26] In the First Mithridatic War (89–85 BC), Sulla had to requisition ships wherever he could find them to counter Mithridates' fleet. Despite the makeshift nature of the Roman fleet however, in 86 BC Lucullus defeated the Pontic navy at Tenedos.[27] Immediately after the end of the war, a permanent force of ca. 100 vessels was established in the Aegean from the contributions of Rome's allied maritime states. Although sufficient to guard against Mithridates, this force was totally inadequate against the pirates, whose power grew rapidly.[27] Over the next decade, the pirates defeated several Roman commanders, and raided unhindered even to the shores of Italy, reaching Rome's harbor, Ostia.[28] According to the account of Plutarch, "the ships of the pirates numbered more than a thousand, and the cities captured by them four hundred."[29] Their activity posed a growing threat for the Roman economy, and a challenge to Roman power: several prominent Romans, including two praetors with their retinue and the young Julius Caesar, were captured and held for ransom. Perhaps most important of all, the pirates disrupted Rome's vital lifeline, namely the massive shipments of grain and other produce from Africa and Egypt that were needed to sustain the city's population.[30] The resulting grain shortages were a major political issue, and popular discontent threatened to become explosive. In 74 BC, with the outbreak of the Third Mithridatic War, Marcus Antonius (the father of Mark Antony) was appointed praetor with extraordinary imperium against the pirate threat, but signally failed in his task: he was defeated off Crete in 72 BC, and died shortly after.[31] Finally, in 67 BC the Lex Gabinia was passed in the Plebeian Council, vesting Pompey with unprecedented powers and authorizing him to move against them.[32] In a massive and concerted campaign, Pompey cleared the seas of the pirates in only three months.[25][33] Afterwards, the fleet was reduced again to policing duties against intermittent piracy. Caesar and the Civil Wars[edit] In 56 BC, for the first time a Roman fleet engaged in battle outside the Mediterranean. This occurred during Julius Caesar's Gallic Wars, when the maritime tribe of the Veneti rebelled against Rome. Against the Veneti, the Romans were at a disadvantage, since they did not know the coast, and were inexperienced in fighting in the open sea with its tides and currents.[34] Furthermore, the Veneti ships were superior to the light Roman galleys. They were built of oak and had no oars, being thus more resistant to ramming. In addition, their greater height gave them an advantage in both missile exchanges and boarding actions.[35] In the event, when the two fleets encountered each other in Quiberon Bay, Caesar's navy, under the command of D. Brutus, resorted to the use of hooks on long poles, which cut the halyards supporting the Veneti sails.[36] Immobile, the Veneti ships were easy prey for the legionaries who boarded them, and fleeing Veneti ships were taken when they became becalmed by a sudden lack of winds.[37] Having thus established his control of the English Channel, in the next years Caesar used this newly built fleet to carry out two invasions of Britain. Silver denarius struck by Sextus Pompeius in 44–43 BC, featuring a bust of Pompey the Great and a Roman warship. The last major campaigns of the Roman navy in the Mediterranean until the late 3rd century AD would be in the civil wars that ended the Republic. In the East, the Republican faction quickly established its control, and Rhodes, the last independent maritime power in the Aegean, was subdued by Gaius Cassius Longinus in 43 BC, after its fleet was defeated off Kos. In the West, against the triumvirs stood Sextus Pompeius, who had been given command of the Italian fleet by the Senate in 43 BC. He took control of Sicily and made it his base, blockading Italy and stopping the politically crucial supply of grain from Africa to Rome.[38] After suffering a defeat from Sextus in 42 BC, Octavian initiated massive naval armaments, aided by his closest associate, Marcus Agrippa: ships were built at Ravenna and Ostia, the new artificial harbor of Portus Julius built at Cumae, and soldiers and rowers levied, including over 20,000 manumitted slaves.[39] Finally, Octavian and Agrippa defeated Sextus in the Battle of Naulochus in 36 BC, putting an end to all Pompeian resistance. The Battle of Actium, by Laureys a Castro, painted 1672. Octavian's power was further enhanced after his victory against the combined fleets of Mark Antony and Cleopatra, Queen of Egypt, in the Battle of Actium in 31 BC, where Antony had assembled 500 ships against Octavian's 400 ships.[40] This last naval battle of the Roman Republic definitively established Octavian as the sole ruler over Rome and the Mediterranean world. In the aftermath of his victory, he formalized the Fleet's structure, establishing several key harbors in the Mediterranean (see below). The now fully professional navy had its main duties consist of protecting against piracy, escorting troops and patrolling the river frontiers of Europe. It remained however engaged in active warfare in the periphery of the Empire. Principate[edit] Operations under Augustus[edit] Under Augustus and after the conquest of Egypt there were increasing demands from the Roman economy to extend the trade lanes to India. The Arabian control of all sea routes to India was an obstacle. One of the first naval operations under princeps Augustus was therefore the preparation for a campaign on the Arabian Peninsula. Aelius Gallus, the prefect of Egypt ordered the construction of 130 transports and subsequently carried 10,000 soldiers to Arabia.[41] But the following march through the desert towards Yemen failed and the plans for control of the Arabian peninsula had to be abandoned. At the other end of the Empire, in Germania, the navy played an important role in the supply and transport of the legions. In 15 BC an independent fleet was installed at the Lake Constance. Later, the generals Drusus and Tiberius used the Navy extensively, when they tried to extend the Roman frontier to the Elbe. In 12 BC Drusus ordered the construction of a fleet of 1,000 ships and sailed them along the Rhine into the North Sea.[42] The Frisii and Chauci had nothing to oppose the superior numbers, tactics and technology of the Romans. When these entered the river mouths of Weser and Ems, the local tribes had to surrender. In 5 BC the Roman knowledge concerning the North and Baltic Sea was fairly extended during a campaign by Tiberius, reaching as far as the Elbe: Plinius describes how Roman naval formations came past Heligoland and set sail to the north-eastern coast of Denmark, and Augustus himself boasts in his Res Gestae: "My fleet sailed from the mouth of the Rhine eastward as far as the lands of the Cimbri to which, up to that time, no Roman had ever penetrated either by land or by sea...".[43] The multiple naval operations north of Germania had to be abandoned after the battle of the Teutoburg Forest in the year 9 AD. Julio-Claudian dynasty[edit] In the years 15 and 16, Germanicus carried out several fleet operations along the rivers Rhine and Ems, without permanent results due to grim Germanic resistance and a disastrous storm.[44] By 28, the Romans lost further control of the Rhine mouth in a succession of Frisian insurgencies. From 43 to 85, the Roman navy played an important role in the Roman conquest of Britain. The classis Germanica rendered outstanding services in multitudinous landing operations. In 46, a naval expedition made a push deep into the Black Sea region and even travelled on the Tanais. In 47 a revolt by the Chauci, who took to piratical activities along the Gallic coast, was subdued by Gnaeus Domitius Corbulo.[45] By 57 an expeditionary corps reached Chersonesos (see Charax, Crimea). It seems that under Nero, the navy obtained strategically important positions for trading with India; but there was no known fleet in the Red Sea. Possibly, parts of the Alexandrian fleet were operating as escorts for the Indian trade. In the Jewish revolt, from 66 to 70, the Romans were forced to fight Jewish ships, operating from a harbour in the area of modern Tel Aviv, on Israel's Mediterranean coast. In the meantime several flotilla engagements on the Sea of Galilee took place. In 68, as his reign became increasingly insecure, Nero raised legio I Adiutrix from sailors of the praetorian fleets. After Nero's overthrow, in 69, the "Year of the four emperors", the praetorian fleets supported Emperor Otho against the usurper Vitellius,[46] and after his eventual victory, Vespasian formed another legion, legio II Adiutrix, from their ranks.[47] Only in the Pontus did Anicetus, the commander of the Classis Pontica, support Vitellius. He burned the fleet, and sought refuge with the Iberian tribes, engaging in piracy. After a new fleet was built, this revolt was subdued.[48] Flavian, Antonine and Severan dynasties[edit] Two-banked lburnians of the Danube fleets during Trajan's Dacian Wars. Casts of reliefs from Trajan's Column, Rome. Mosaic of a Roman galley, Bardo Museum, Tunisia, 2nd century AD. During the Batavian rebellion of Gaius Julius Civilis (69–70), the rebels got hold of a squadron of the Rhine fleet by treachery,[49] and the conflict featured frequent use of the Roman Rhine flotilla. In the last phase of the war, the British fleet and legio XIV were brought in from Britain to attack the Batavian coast, but the Cananefates, allies of the Batavians, were able to destroy or capture a large part of the fleet.[50] In the meantime, the new Roman commander, Quintus Petillius Cerialis, advanced north and constructed a new fleet. Civilis attempted only a short encounter with his own fleet, but could not hinder the superior Roman force from landing and ravaging the island of the Batavians, leading to the negotiation of a peace soon after.[51] In the years 82 to 85, the Romans under Gnaeus Julius Agricola launched a campaign against the Caledonians in modern Scotland. In this context the Roman navy significantly escalated activities on the eastern Scottish coast.[52] Simultaneously multiple expeditions and reconnaissance trips were launched. During these the Romans would capture the Orkney Islands (Orcades) for a short period of time and obtained information about the Shetland Islands.[53] There is some speculation about a Roman landing in Ireland, based on Tacitus reports about Agricola contemplating the island's conquest,[54] but no conclusive evidence to support this theory has been found. Under the Five Good Emperors the navy operated mainly on the rivers; so it played an important role during Trajan's conquest of Dacia and temporarily an independent fleet for the Euphrates and Tigris rivers was founded. Also during the wars against the Marcomanni confederation under Marcus Aurelius several combats took place on the Danube and the Tisza. Under the aegis of the Severan dynasty, the only known military operations of the navy were carried out under Septimius Severus, using naval assistance on his campaigns along the Euphrates and Tigris, as well as in Scotland. Thereby Roman ships reached inter alia the Persian Gulf and the top of the British Isles. 3rd century crisis[edit] As the 3rd century dawned, the Roman Empire was at its peak. In the Mediterranean, peace had reigned for over two centuries, as piracy had been wiped out and no outside naval threats occurred. As a result, complacency had set in: naval tactics and technology were neglected, and the Roman naval system had become moribund.[55] After 230 however and for fifty years, the situation changed dramatically. The so-called "Crisis of the Third Century" ushered a period of internal turmoil, and the same period saw a renewed series of seaborne assaults, which the imperial fleets proved unable to stem.[56] In the West, Picts and Irish ships raided Britain, while the Saxons raided the North Sea, forcing the Romans to abandon Frisia.[56] In the East, the Goths and other tribes from modern Ukraine raided in great numbers over the Black Sea.[57] These invasions began during the rule of Trebonianus Gallus, when for the first time Germanic tribes built up their own powerful fleet in the Black Sea. Via two surprise attacks (256) on Roman naval bases in the Caucasus and near the Danube, numerous ships fell into the hands of the Germans, whereupon the raids were extended as far as the Aegean Sea; Byzantium, Athens, Sparta and other towns were plundered and the responsible provincial fleets were heavily debilitated. It was not until the attackers made a tactical error, that their onrush could be stopped. In 267–270 another, much fiercer series of attacks took place. A fleet composed of Heruli and other tribes raided the coasts of Thrace and the Pontus. Defeated off Byzantium by general Venerianus,[58] the barbarians fled into the Aegean, and ravaged many islands and coastal cities, including Athens and Corinth. As they retreated northwards over land, they were defeated by Emperor Gallienus at Nestos.[59] However, this was merely the prelude to an even larger invasion that was launched in 268/269: several tribes banded together (the Historia Augusta mentions Scythians, Greuthungi, Tervingi, Gepids, Peucini, Celts and Heruli) and allegedly 2,000 ships and 325,000 men strong,[60] raided the Thracian shore, attacked Byzantium and continued raiding the Aegean as far as Crete, while the main force approached Thessalonica. Emperor Claudius II however was able to defeat them at the Battle of Naissus, ending the Gothic threat for the time being.[61] Barbarian raids also increased along the Rhine frontier and in the North Sea. Eutropius mentions that during the 280s, the sea along the coasts of the provinces of Belgica and Armorica was "infested with Franks and Saxons". To counter them, Maximian appointed Carausius as commander of the British Fleet.[62] However, Carausius rose up in late 286 and seceded from the Empire with Britannia and parts of the northern Gallic coast.[63] With a single blow Roman control of the channel and the North Sea was lost, and emperor Maximinus was forced to create a completely new Northern Fleet, but in lack of training it was almost immediately destroyed in a storm.[64] Only in 293, under Caesar Constantius Chlorus did Rome regain the Gallic coast. A new fleet was constructed in order to cross the Channel,[65] and in 296, with a concentric attack on Londinium the insurgent province was retaken.[66] Late antiquity[edit] By the end of the 3rd century, the Roman navy had declined dramatically. Although Emperor Diocletian is held to have strengthened the navy, and increased its manpower from 46,000 to 64,000 men,[67] the old standing fleets had all but vanished, and in the civil wars that ended the Tetrarchy, the opposing sides had to mobilize the resources and commandeered the ships of the Eastern Mediterranean port cities.[57] These conflicts thus brought about a renewal of naval activity, culminating in the Battle of the Hellespont in 324 between the forces of Constantine I under Caesar Crispus and the fleet of Licinius, which was the only major naval confrontation of the 4th century. Vegetius, writing at the end of the 4th century, testifies to the disappearance of the old praetorian fleets in Italy, but comments on the continued activity of the Danube fleet.[68] In the 5th century, only the eastern half of the Empire could field an effective fleet, as it could draw upon the maritime resources of Greece and the Levant. Although the Notitia Dignitatum still mentions several naval units for the Western Empire, these were apparently too depleted to be able to carry out much more than patrol duties.[69] At any rate, the rise of the naval power of the Vandal Kingdom under Geiseric in North Africa, and its raids in the Western Mediterranean, were practically uncontested.[57] Although there is some evidence of West Roman naval activity in the first half of the 5th century, this is mostly confined to troop transports and minor landing operations.[68] The historian Priscus and Sidonius Apollinaris affirm in their writings that by the mid-5th century, the Western Empire essentially lacked a war navy.[70] Matters became even worse after the disastrous failure of the fleets mobilized against the Vandals in 460 and 468, under the emperors Majorian and Anthemius. For the West, there would be no recovery, as the last Western Emperor, Romulus Augustulus, was deposed in 476. In the East however, the classical naval tradition survived, and in the 6th century, a standing navy was reformed.[57] The East Roman (Byzantine) navy would remain a formidable force in the Mediterranean until the 11th century. Organization[edit] Crews[edit] Roman warship on a denarius of Mark Antony The bulk of a galley's crew was formed by the rowers, the remiges (sing. remex) or eretai (sing. eretēs) in Greek. Despite popular perceptions, the Roman fleet, and ancient fleets in general, relied throughout their existence on rowers of free status, and not on galley slaves. Slaves were employed only in times of pressing manpower demands or extreme emergency, and even then, they were freed first.[71] In Imperial times, non-citizen freeborn provincials (peregrini), chiefly from nations with a maritime background such as Greeks, Phoenicians, Syrians and Egyptians, formed the bulk of the fleets' crews.[71][72] During the early Principate, a ship's crew, regardless of its size, was organized as a centuria. Crewmen could sign on as marines (Called Marinus), rowers/seamen, craftsmen and various other jobs, though all personnel serving in the imperial fleet were classed as milites ("soldiers"), regardless of their function; only when differentiation with the army was required, were the adjectives classiarius or classicus added. Along with several other instances of prevalence of army terminology, this testifies to the lower social status of naval personnel, considered inferior to the auxiliaries and the legionaries.[71] Emperor Claudius first gave legal privileges to the navy's crewmen, enabling them to receive Roman citizenship after their period of service.[73] This period was initially set at a minimum of 26 years (one year more than the legions), and was later expanded to 28. Upon honorable discharge (honesta missio), the sailors received a sizable cash payment as well.[74] As in the army, the ship's centuria was headed by a centurion with an optio as his deputy, while a beneficiarius supervised a small administrative staff.[13] Among the crew were also a number of principales (junior officers) and immunes (specialists exempt from certain duties). Some of these positions, mostly administrative, were identical to those of the army auxiliaries, while some (mostly of Greek provenance) were peculiar to the fleet. An inscription from the island of Cos, dated to the First Mithridatic War, provides us with a list of a ship's officers, the nautae: the gubernator (kybernētēs in Greek) was the helmsman or pilot, the celeusta (keleustēs in Greek) supervised the rowers, a proreta (prōreus in Greek) was the look-out stationed at the bow, a pentacontarchos was apparently a junior officer, and an iatros (Lat. medicus), the ship's doctor.[75] Each ship was commanded by a trierarchus, whose exact relationship with the ship's centurion is unclear. Squadrons, most likely of ten ships each, were put under a nauarchus, who often appears to have risen from the ranks of the trierarchi.[71][76][77] The post of nauarchus archigubernes or nauarchus princeps appeared later in the Imperial period, and functioned either as a commander of several squadrons or as an executive officer under a civilian admiral, equivalent to the legionary primus pilus.[78][79] All these were professional officers, usually peregrini, who had a status equal to an auxiliary centurion (and were thus increasingly called centuriones [classiarii] after ca. 70 AD).[80] Until the reign of Antoninus Pius, their careers were restricted to the fleet.[13] Only in the 3rd century were these officers equated to the legionary centurions in status and pay, and could henceforth be transferred to a similar position in the legions.[81] Merchant vessels were commanded by the magister navis. If privately owned, the owner was called exercitor navis.[82] The modern term of "master" to designate a captain of a merchant vessel derives from the magister navis. High Command[edit] During the Republic, command of a fleet was given to a serving magistrate or promagistrate, usually of consular or praetorian rank.[83] In the Punic Wars for instance, one consul would usually command the fleet, and another the army. In the subsequent wars in the Eastern Mediterranean, praetors would assume the command of the fleet. However, since these men were political appointees, the actual handling of the fleets and of separate squadrons was entrusted to their more experienced legates and subordinates. It was therefore during the Punic Wars that the separate position of praefectus classis ("fleet prefect") first appeared.[84] Initially subordinate to the magistrate in command, after the fleet's reorganization by Augustus, the praefectus classis became a procuratorial position in charge of each of the permanent fleets. These posts were initially filled either from among the equestrian class, or, especially under Claudius, from the Emperor's freedmen, thus securing imperial control over the fleets.[85] From the period of the Flavian emperors, the status of the praefectura was raised, and only equestrians with military experience who had gone through the militia equestri were appointed.[78][85] Nevertheless, the prefects remained largely political appointees, and despite their military experience, usually in command of army auxiliary units, their knowledge of naval matters was minimal, forcing them to rely on their professional subordinates.[74] The difference in importance of the fleets they commanded was also reflected by the rank and the corresponding pay of the commanders. The prefects of the two praetorian fleets were ranked procuratores ducenarii, meaning they earned 200,000 sesterces annually, the prefects of the Classis Germanica, the Classis Britannica and later the Classis Pontica were centenarii (i.e. earning 100,000 sesterces), while the other fleet prefects were sexagenarii (i.e. they received 60,000 sesterces).[86] Ship types[edit] Further information: Hellenistic-era warships Model of a Roman bireme The generic Roman term for an oar-driven galley warship was "long ship" (Latin: navis longa, Greek: naus makra), as opposed to the sail-driven navis oneraria (from onus, oneris: burden), a merchant vessel, or the minor craft (navigia minora) like the scapha.[87] The navy consisted of a wide variety of different classes of warships, from heavy polyremes to light raiding and scouting vessels. Unlike the rich Hellenistic Successor kingdoms in the East however, the Romans did not rely on heavy warships, with quinqueremes (Gk. pentērēs), and to a lesser extent quadriremes (Gk. tetrērēs) and triremes (Gk. triērēs) providing the mainstay of the Roman fleets from the Punic Wars to the end of the Civil Wars.[88] The heaviest vessel mentioned in Roman fleets during this period was the hexareme, of which a few were used as flagships.[89] Lighter vessels such as the liburnians and the hemiolia, both swift types invented by pirates, were also adopted as scouts and light transport vessels. During the final confrontation between Octavian and Mark Antony, Octavian's fleet was composed of quinqueremes, together with some "sixes" and many triremes and liburnians, while Antony, who had the resources of Ptolemaic Egypt to draw upon,[88] fielded a fleet also mostly composed of quinqueremes, but with a sizeable complement of heavier warships, ranging from "sixes" to "tens" (Gk. dekērēs).[90][91] Later historical tradition made much of the prevalence of lighter and swifter vessels in Octavian's fleet,[92] with Vegetius even explicitly ascribing Octavian's victory to the liburnians.[93] Reconstruction of a late Roman navis lusoria at Mainz This prominence of lighter craft in the historical narrative is perhaps best explained in light of subsequent developments. After Actium, the operational landscape had changed: for the remainder of the Principate, no opponent existed to challenge Roman naval hegemony, and no massed naval confrontation was likely. The tasks at hand for the Roman navy were now the policing of the Mediterranean waterways and the border rivers, suppression of piracy, and escort duties for the grain shipments to Rome and for imperial army expeditions. Lighter ships were far better suited to these tasks, and after the reorganization of the fleet following Actium, the largest ship kept in service was a hexareme, the flagship of the Classis Misenensis. The bulk of the fleets was composed of the lighter triremes and liburnians (Latin: liburna, Greek: libyrnis), with the latter apparently providing the majority of the provincial fleets.[94] In time, the term "liburnian" came to mean "warship" in a generic sense.[25] In addition, there were smaller oared vessels, such as the navis actuaria, with 30 oars (15 on each bank), a ship primarily used for transport in coastal and fluvial operations, for which its shallow draught and flat keel were ideal. In late antiquity, it was succeeded in this role by the navis lusoria ("playful ship"), which was extensively used for patrols and raids by the legionary flotillas in the Rhine and Danube frontiers. Roman ships were commonly named after gods (Mars, Iuppiter, Minerva, Isis), mythological heroes (Hercules), geographical maritime features such as Rhenus or Oceanus, concepts such as Harmony, Peace, Loyalty, Victory (Concordia, Pax, Fides, Victoria) or after important events (Dacicus for the Trajan's Dacian Wars or Salamina for the Battle of Salamis).[95] They were distinguished by their figurehead (insigne or parasemum),[96] and, during the Civil Wars at least, by the paint schemes on their turrets, which varied according to each fleet.[97] Armament and tactics[edit] Ballistae on a Roman ship In classical antiquity, a ship's main weapon was the ram (rostra, hence the name navis rostrata for a warship), which was used to sink or immobilize an enemy ship by holing its hull. Its use, however, required a skilled and experienced crew and a fast and agile ship like a trireme or quinquereme. In the Hellenistic period, the larger navies came instead to rely on greater vessels. This had several advantages: the heavier and sturdier construction lessened the effects of ramming, and the greater space and stability of the vessels allowed the transport not only of more marines, but also the placement of deck-mounted ballistae and catapults.[98] Although the ram continued to be a standard feature of all warships and ramming the standard mode of attack, these developments transformed the role of a warship: from the old "manned missile", designed to sink enemy ships, they became mobile artillery platforms, which engaged in missile exchange and boarding actions. The Romans in particular, being initially inexperienced at sea combat, relied upon boarding actions through the use of the Corvus. Although it brought them some decisive victories, it was discontinued because it tended to unbalance the quinqueremes in high seas; two Roman fleets are recorded to have been lost during storms in the First Punic War.[99] During the Civil Wars, a number of technical innovations, which are attributed to Agrippa,[100] took place: the harpax, a catapult-fired grappling hook, which was used to clamp onto an enemy ship, reel it in and board it, in a much more efficient way than with the old corvus, and the use of collapsible fighting towers placed one apiece bow and stern, which were used to provide the boarders with supporting fire.[101] Fleets[edit] Principate period[edit] Map of the Roman fleets and major naval bases during the Principate After the end of the civil wars, Augustus reduced and reorganized the Roman armed forces, including the navy. A large part of the fleet of Mark Antony was burned, and the rest was withdrawn to a new base at Forum Iulii (modern Fréjus),[102] which remained operative until the reign of Claudius.[103] However, the bulk of the fleet was soon subdivided into two praetorian fleets at Misenum and Ravenna, supplemented by a growing number of minor ones in the provinces, which were often created on an ad hoc basis for specific campaigns. This organizational structure was maintained almost unchanged until the 4th century. Praetorian fleets[edit] The two major fleets were stationed in Italy and acted as a central naval reserve, directly available to the Emperor (hence the designation "praetorian"). In the absence of any naval threat, their duties mostly involved patrolling and transport duties. These were not confined to the waters around Italy, but throughout the Mediterranean. There is epigraphic evidence for the presence of sailors of the two praetorian fleets at Piraeus and Syria. These two fleets were: The Classis Misenensis, established in 27 BC and based at Portus Julius. Later Classis praetoria Misenesis Pia Vindex. Detachments of the fleet served at secondary bases, such as Ostia, Puteoli, Centumcellae and other harbors.[104] The Classis Ravennas, established in 27 BC and based at Ravenna. Later Classis praetoria Ravennatis Pia Vindex. Provincial fleets[edit] The various provincial fleets were smaller than the praetorian fleets and composed mostly of lighter vessels. Nevertheless, it was these fleets that saw action, in full campaigns or raids on the periphery of the Empire. The Classis Africana Commodiana Herculea, established by Commodus in 186 to secure the grain shipments (annona) from North Africa to Italy,[105] after the model of the Classis Alexandrina. The Classis Alexandriae, based in Alexandria, it controlled the eastern part of the Mediterranean Sea. It was founded by Augustus around 30 BC, probably from ships that fought at the Battle of Actium and manned mostly by Greeks of the Nile Delta.[106] Having supported emperor Vespasian in the civil war of 69, it was awarded of the cognomen Augusta.[106] The fleet was responsible chiefly for the escort of the grain shipments to Rome (and later Constantinople), and also apparently operated the Potamophylaciae, the Nile river patrol.[107] The Classis Britannica, established in 40 or 43 AD at Gesoriacum (Boulogne-sur-Mer).[108] It participated in the Roman invasion of Britain and the subsequent campaigns in the island.[106] The fleet was probably based at Rutupiae (Richborough) until 85 AD, when it was transferred to Dubris (Dover). Other bases were Portus Lemanis (Lympne) and Anderitum (Pevensey), while Gesoriacum on the Gallic coast likely remained active.[109] During the 2nd–3rd centuries, the fleet was chiefly employed in transport of supplies and men across the English Channel. The Classis Britannica disappears (at least under that name) from the mid-3rd century, and the sites occupied by it were soon incorporated into the Saxon Shore system.[109] The Classis Germanica was established in 12 BC by Drusus at Castra Vetera.[110] It controlled the Rhine river, and was mainly a fluvial fleet, although it also operated in the North Sea. It is noteworthy that the Romans' initial lack of experience with the tides of the ocean left Drusus' fleet stranded on the Zuiderzee.[111] After ca. 30 AD, the fleet moved its main base to the castrum of Alteburg, some 4 km south of Colonia Agrippinensis (modern Cologne).[112] Later granted the honorifics Augusta Pia Fidelis Domitiana following the suppression of the Revolt of Saturninus.[113] The Classis nova Libyca, first mentioned in 180, based most likely at Ptolemais on the Cyrenaica. The Classis Mauretanica, based at Caesarea Mauretaniae (modern Cherchell), it controlled the African coasts of the western Mediterranean Sea. Established on a permanent basis after the raids by the Moors in the early 170s. The Classis Moesica was established sometime between 20 BC and 10 AD.[110] It was based in Noviodunum and controlled the Lower Danube from the Iron Gates to the northwestern Black Sea as far as the Crimea.[114] The honorific Flavia, awarded to it and to the Classis pannonica, may indicate its reorganization by Vespasian.[115] The Classis Pannonica, a fluvial fleet controlling the Upper Danube from Castra Regina in Raetia (modern Regensburg) to Singidunum in Moesia (modern Belgrade). Its exact date of establishment is unknown. Some trace it to Augustus' campaigns in Pannonia in ca. 35 BC, but it was certainly in existence by 45 AD.[113][116] Its main base was probably Taurunum (modern Zemun) at the confluence of the river Sava with the Danube. Under the Flavian dynasty, it received the cognomen Flavia.[116] The Classis Perinthia, established after the annexation of Thrace in 46 AD and based in Perinthus. Probably based on the indigenous navy, it operated in the Propontis and the Thracian coast.[48] Probably united with the Classis Pontica at a later stage. The Classis Pontica, founded in 64 AD from the Pontic royal fleet,[110][117] and based in Trapezus, although on occasion it was moved to Byzantium (in ca. 70),[118] and in 170, to Cyzicus.[119] This fleet was used to guard the southern and eastern Black Sea, and the entrance of the Bosporus.[85] According to the historian Josephus, in the latter half of the 1st century, it numbered 40 warships and 3,000 men.[120] The Classis Syriaca, established probably under Vespasian, and based in Seleucia Pieria (hence the alternative name Classis Seleucena)[121] in Syria.[107] This fleet controlled the Eastern Mediterranean and the Aegean sea. In addition, there is significant archaeological evidence for naval activity by certain legions, which in all likelihood operated their own squadrons: legio XXII Primigenia in the Upper Rhine and Main rivers, legio X Fretensis in the Jordan River and the Sea of Galilee, and several legionary squadrons in the Danube frontier.[122] Dominate period[edit] Our main source for the structure of the late Roman military is the Notitia Dignitatum, which corresponds to the situation of the 390s for the Eastern Empire and the 420s for the Western Empire. Notable in the Notitia is the large number of smaller squadrons that have been created, most of these fluvial and of a local operational role. Fleets of the Danube frontier[edit] The Upper Danube (Pannonian) limes The Lower Danube (Moesian) limes The Classis Pannonica and the Classis Moesica were broken up into several smaller squadrons, collectively termed Classis Histrica, authority of the frontier commanders (duces).[123] with bases at Mursa in Pannonia II,[124] Florentia in Pannonia Valeria,[125] Arruntum in Pannonia I,[126] Viminacium in Moesia I[127] and Aegetae in Dacia ripensis.[128] Smaller fleets are also attested on the tributaries of the Danube: the Classis Arlapensis et Maginensis (based at Arelape and Comagena) and the Classis Lauriacensis (based at Lauriacum) in Pannonia I,[126] the Classis Stradensis et Germensis, based at Margo in Moesia I,[127] and the Classis Ratianensis, in Dacia ripensis.[128] The naval units were complemented by port garrisons and marine units, drawn from the army. In the Danube frontier these were: In Pannonia I and Noricum ripensis, naval detachments (milites liburnarii) of the legio XIV Gemina and the legio X Gemina at Carnuntum and Arrabonae, and of the legio II Italica at Ioviacum.[126] In Pannonia II, the I Flavia Augusta (at Sirmium) and the II Flavia are listed under their prefects.[124] In Moesia II, two units of sailors (milites nauclarii) at Appiaria and Altinum.[129] In Scythia Minor, marines (muscularii)[130] of legio II Herculia at Inplateypegiis and sailors (nauclarii) at Flaviana.[131] Fleets in Western Europe[edit] In the West, and in particular in Gaul, several fluvial fleets had been established. These came under the command of the magister peditum of the West, and were:[132] The Classis Anderetianorum, based at Parisii (Paris) and operating in the Seine and Oise rivers. The Classis Ararica, based at Caballodunum (Chalon-sur-Saône) and operating in the Saône River. A Classis barcariorum, composed of small vessels, at Eburodunum (modern Yverdon-les-Bains) at Lake Neuchâtel. The Classis Comensis at Lake Como. The old praetorian fleets, the Classis Misenatis and the Classis Ravennatis are still listed, albeit with no distinction indicating any higher importance than the other fleets. The "praetorian" surname is still attested until the early 4th century, but absent from Vegetius or the Notitia.[133] The Classis fluminis Rhodani, based at Arelate and operating in the Rhône River. It was complemented with a marine detachment (milites muscularii) based at Marseilles. The Classis Sambrica, based at Locus Quartensis (unknown location) and operating in the Somme River and the Channel. It came under the command of the dux Beligae Secundae.[134] The Classis Venetum, based at Aquileia and operating in the northern Adriatic Sea. This fleet may have been established to ensure communications with the imperial capitals in the Po Valley (Ravenna and Milan) and with Dalmatia.[135] Bases and command sectors of the Saxon Shore system It is notable that, with the exception of the praetorian fleets (whose retention in the list does not necessarily signify an active status), the old fleets of the Principate are missing. The Classis Britannica vanishes under that name after the mid-3rd century;[136] its remnants were later subsumed in the Saxon Shore system. By the time of the Notitia Dignitatum, the Classis Germanica has ceased to exist (it is last mentioned under Julian in 359),[137] most probably due to the collapse of the Rhine frontier after the Crossing of the Rhine by the barbarians in winter 405–406, and the Mauretanian and African fleets had been disbanded or taken over by the Vandals. Fleets in the Eastern Mediterranean[edit] As far as the East is concerned, we know from legal sources that the Classis Alexandrina[138] and the Classis Seleucena[139] continued to operate, and that in ca. 400 a Classis Carpathia was detached from the Syrian fleet and based at the Aegean island of Karpathos.[140] A fleet is known to have been stationed at Constantinople itself, but no further details are known about it.[57] Ports[edit] Major Roman ports were: Portus Julius, located at Misenum Classis, near Ravenna Alexandria Leptis Magna Ostia Portus Port of Mainz (Mogontiacum, river navy on the Rhine) See also[edit] Ancient Rome portal War portal Caligula's Giant Ship Nemi ships Roman shipyard of Stifone (Narni) Notes[edit] ^ Potter 2004, pp. 77–78 ^ "Map of the Roman Fleet". ^ Meijer 1986, pp. 147–148 ^ a b Meijer 1986, p. 149 ^ Livy, AUC IX.30; XL.18,26; XLI.1 ^ a b c Goldsworthy 2000, p. 96 ^ Meijer 1986, p. 150 ^ Potter 2004, p. 76 ^ a b Goldsworthy (2003), p. 34 ^ a b Goldsworthy (2000), p. 97 ^ Polybius, The Histories, I.20–21 ^ Saddington 2007, p. 201 ^ a b c Webster & Elton (1998), p. 166 ^ a b c Goldsworthy (2003), p. 38 ^ a b Meijer 1986, p. 167 ^ Gruen (1984), p. 359. ^ Meijer 1986, pp. 167–168 ^ Meijer 1986, p. 168 ^ Meijer 1986, p. 170 ^ Meijer 1986, pp. 170–171 ^ Meijer 1986, p. 173 ^ D.B. Saddington (2011) [2007]. "the Evolution of the Roman Imperial Fleets," in Paul Erdkamp (ed), A Companion to the Roman Army, 201–217. Malden, Oxford, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 978-1-4051-2153-8. Plate 12.2 on p. 204. ^ Coarelli, Filippo (1987), I Santuari del Lazio in età repubblicana. NIS, Rome, pp. 35–84. ^ a b Meijer 1986, p. 175 ^ a b c Connolly (1998), p. 273 ^ Appian, The Mithridatic Wars, § 92 ^ a b Starr (1989), p. 62 ^ Cassius Dio, Historia Romana, XXXVI.22 ^ Plutarch, Life of Pompey, § 24 ^ Appian, The Mithridatic Wars, § 93 ^ Goldsworthy (2007), p. 186 ^ Appian, The Mithridatic Wars, § 94 ^ Appian, The Mithridatic Wars, § 95–§ 96 ^ Caesar, Commentaries on the Gallic Wars, III.9 ^ Caesar, Commentaries on the Gallic Wars, III.13 ^ Caesar, Commentaries on the Gallic Wars, III.14 ^ Caesar, Commentaries on the Gallic Wars, III.15 ^ Saddington 2007, pp. 205–206 ^ Saddington 2007, p. 206 ^ Saddington 2007, p. 207 ^ Saddington 2007, p. 208 ^ Tacitus, The Annals II.6 ^ Res Gestae, 26.4 ^ Webster & Elton (1998), pp. 160–161 ^ Webster & Elton (1998), p. 161 ^ Tacitus, The Histories, II.12 ^ Tacitus, The Histories, II.67 ^ a b Webster & Elton (1998), p. 164 ^ Tacitus, The Histories, IV.16 ^ Tacitus, The Histories, IV.79 ^ Tacitus, The Histories, V.23–25 ^ Tacitus, Agricola, 25; 29 ^ Tacitus, Agricola, 10 ^ Tacitus, Agricola, 24 ^ Lewis & Runyan (1985), p. 3 ^ a b Lewis & Runyan (1985), p. 4 ^ a b c d e Casson (1991), p. 213 ^ Scriptores Historiae Augustae, Vita Gallienii, 13.6–7 ^ Scriptores Historiae Augustae, Vita Gallienii, 13.8–9 ^ Scriptores Historiae Augustae, Vita Divi Claudii, 6.2–4; 8.1 ^ Zosimus, Historia Nova, I.42–45 ^ Eutropius, Breviarium, IX.21 ^ Panegyrici Latini, 8.6 ^ Panegyrici Latini, 8.12 ^ Panegyrici Latini, 6.5; 8.6–8 ^ Eutropius, Breviarium 9.22; Aurelius Victor, Book of Caesars 39.42 ^ Treadgold (1997), p. 145 ^ a b MacGeorge (2002), pp. 306–307 ^ Lewis & Runyan (1985), pp. 4–8 ^ MacGeorge (2002), p. 307 ^ a b c d Casson (1991), p. 188 ^ Starr (1960), p. 75 Table 1 ^ Saddington 2007, p. 212 ^ a b Gardiner 2004, p. 80 ^ Saddington 2007, pp. 201–202 ^ Starr (1960), p. 39 ^ Webster & Elton (1998), pp. 165–166 ^ a b Saddington 2007, p. 210 ^ Starr (1960), pp. 42–43 ^ Saddington 2007, pp. 210–211 ^ Wesch-Klein (1998), p. 25 ^ http://casopisi.junis.ni.ac.rs/index.php/FULawPol/article/view/4688 ^ Rodgers (1976), p. 60 ^ Livy, AUC XXVI.48; XXXVI.42 ^ a b c Webster & Elton (1998), p. 165 ^ Pflaum, H.G. (1950). Les procurateurs équestres sous le Haut-Empire romain, pp. 50–53 ^ Saddington 2007, pp. 202–203 ^ a b Potter 2004, p. 77 ^ Gardiner 2004, p. 70 ^ Cassius Dio, Historia Romana, L.23.2 ^ Gardiner 2004, pp. 70, 77 ^ Plutarch, Antony, 62 ^ Vegetius, De Re Militari, IV.33 ^ Casson (1995), p. 141 ^ Casson (1995), pp. 357–358; Casson (1991), pp. 190–191 ^ Saddington 2007, p. 203 ^ Warry (2004), p. 183 ^ Warry (2004), p. 98 ^ Warry (2004), p. 118 ^ Appian, The Civil Wars, V.106 & V.118 ^ Warry (2004), pp. 182–183 ^ Tacitus, The Annals, IV.5; Strabo, Geography, IV.1.9 ^ Gardiner 2004, p. 78 ^ Webster & Elton (1998), p. 158 ^ Scriptores Historiae Augustae, Vita Commodi, 17.7 ^ a b c Webster & Elton (1998), p. 159 ^ a b Saddington 2007, p. 215 ^ Cleere (1977), pp. 16; 18–19 ^ a b Cleere (1977), p. 19 ^ a b c Cleere (1977), p. 16 ^ Webster & Elton (1998), p. 160 ^ Köln-Alteburg at livius.org ^ a b Webster & Elton (1998), p. 162 ^ Webster & Elton (1998), pp. 162–165 ^ Webster & Elton (1998), p. 163 ^ a b Saddington 2007, p. 214 ^ Starr (1989), p. 76 ^ Tacitus, The Histories, II.83; III.47 ^ Starr (1989), p. 77 ^ Josephus, The Jewish War, II.16.4 ^ Codex Theodosianus, X.23.1 ^ "The Fleets and Roman Border Policy". www2.rgzm.de. ^ Pauly-Wissowa, XXII.1300–1301 ^ a b Notitia Dignitatum, Pars Occ., XXXII. ^ Notitia Dignitatum, Pars Occ., XXXIII. ^ a b c Notitia Dignitatum, Pars Occ., XXXIV. ^ a b Notitia Dignitatum, Pars Orient., XLI. ^ a b Notitia Dignitatum, Pars Orient., XLII. ^ Notitia Dignitatum, Pars Orient., XL. ^ musculus (meaning "small mouse") was a kind of small ship ^ Notitia Dignitatum, Pars Orient., XXXIX. ^ Notitia Dignitatum, Pars Occ., XLII. ^ Pauly-Wissowa, III.2639 & XXII.1300 ^ Notitia Dignitatum, Pars Occ., XXXVIII. ^ Lewis & Runyan (1985), p. 6 ^ Classis Britannica at RomanBritain.org ^ Pauly-Wissowa, III.2645–2646 & XXII.1300 ^ Codex Justinianus, XI.2.4 ^ Codex Justinianus, XI.13.1 ^ Codex Theodosianus, XIII.5.32 References[edit] Casson, Lionel (1991), The Ancient Mariners: Seafarers and Sea Fighters of the Mediterranean in Ancient Times, Princeton University Press, ISBN 978-0-691-01477-7 Casson, Lionel (1995), Ships and Seamanship in the Ancient World, Johns Hopkins University Press, ISBN 0-8018-5130-0 Cleere, Henry (1977), "The Classis Britannica" (PDF), CBA Research Report (18): 16–19, retrieved 2008-10-11 Connolly, Peter (1998), Greece and Rome at War, Greenhill Gardiner, Robert (Ed.) (2004), AGE OF THE GALLEY: Mediterranean Oared Vessels since pre-Classical Times, Conway Maritime Press, ISBN 978-0-85177-955-3CS1 maint: extra text: authors list (link) Goldsworthy, Adrian (2000), The Fall of Carthage: The Punic Wars 265–146 BC, Cassell, ISBN 0-304-36642-0 Goldsworthy, Adrian (2003), The Complete Roman Army, Thames & Hudson Ltd., ISBN 0-500-05124-0 Goldsworthy, Adrian (2007), "A Roman Alexander: Pompey the Great", In the name of Rome: The men who won the Roman Empire, Phoenix, ISBN 978-0-7538-1789-6 Gruen, Erich S. (1984), The Hellenistic World and the Coming of Rome: Volume II, University of California Press, ISBN 0-520-04569-6 Lewis, Archibald Ross; Runyan, Timothy J. (1985), European Naval and Maritime History, 300–1500, Indiana University Press, ISBN 0-253-20573-5 MacGeorge, Penny (2002), "Appendix: Naval Power in the Fifth Century", Late Roman Warlords, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-925244-2 Meijer, Fik (1986), A History of Seafaring in the Classical World, Routledge, ISBN 978-0-7099-3565-0 Potter, David (2004), "The Roman Army and Navy", in Flower, Harriet I. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Republic, Cambridge University Press, pp. 66–88, ISBN 978-0-521-00390-2 Rodgers, William L. (1967), Naval Warfare Under Oars, 4th to 16th Centuries: A Study of Strategy, Tactics and Ship Design, Naval Institute Press, ISBN 978-0-87021-487-5 Rost, Georg Alexander (1968), Vom Seewesen und Seehandel in der Antike (in German), John Benjamins Publishing Company, ISBN 90-6032-361-0 Saddington, D.B. (2007), "Classes. The Evolution of the Roman Imperial Fleets", in Erdkamp, Paul (ed.), A Companion to the Roman Army, Blackwell Publishing Ltd., ISBN 978-1-4051-2153-8 Starr, Chester G. (1960), The Roman Imperial Navy: 31 B.C.–A.D. 324 (2nd ed.), Cornell University Press Starr, Chester G. (1989), The Influence of Sea Power on Ancient History, Oxford University Press US, ISBN 978-0-19-505667-9 Treadgold, Warren (1997). A History of the Byzantine State and Society. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. ISBN 0-8047-2630-2. Warry, John (2004), Warfare in the Classical World, Salamander Books Ltd., ISBN 0-8061-2794-5 Webster, Graham; Elton, Hugh (1998), The Roman Imperial Army of the First and Second Centuries A.D., University of Oklahoma Press, ISBN 0-8061-3000-8 Wesch-Klein, Gabriele (1998), Soziale Aspekte des römischen Heerwesens in der Kaiserzeit (in German), Franz Steiner Verlag, ISBN 3-515-07300-0 Workman-Davies, Bradley (2006), Corvus: A Review of the Design and Use of the Roman Boarding Bridge During the First Punic War 264 -241 B.C., Lulu.com, ISBN 978-1-84728-882-0 [self-published source] External links[edit] (in Italian) The Imperial fleet of Misenum The Classis Britannica The Roman Fleet, Roman-Empire.net The Roman Navy: Masters of the Mediterranean, HistoryNet.com Galleria Navale on Navigare Necesse Est Port of Claudius, the museum of Roman merchant ships found in Fiumicino (Rome) Diana Nemorensis, Caligula's ships in the lake of Nemi. Römisch-Germanisches Zentralmuseum Mainz: The Fleets and Roman Border Policy Forum Navis Romana v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films Authority control LCCN: sh87007223 SUDOC: 092172377 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n79116368 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Roman_navy&oldid=990841756" Categories: Navy of ancient Rome Military history of ancient Rome Hidden categories: Articles with short description Short description matches Wikidata Articles containing Latin-language text CS1 maint: extra text: authors list CS1 German-language sources (de) Articles with Italian-language sources (it) Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Languages Български Català Deutsch Eesti Español Français Galego Hrvatski Italiano עברית Latina Nederlands 日本語 Polski Português Română Русский Slovenščina Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Українська Tiếng Việt 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 26 November 2020, at 20:27 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1268 ---- Marcus Aurelius - Wikipedia Marcus Aurelius From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Roman emperor from 161 to 180, philosopher For other uses, see Marcus Aurelius (disambiguation). Not to be confused with Aurelian. Roman emperor Marcus Aurelius A marble bust of Marcus Aurelius at the Musée Saint-Raymond, Toulouse, France Roman emperor Reign 8 March 161 – 17 March 180 Predecessor Antoninus Pius Successor Commodus Co-emperor Lucius Verus (161–169) Commodus (177–180) Born 26 April 121 Rome Died 17 March 180 (aged 58) Sirmium Burial Hadrian's Mausoleum Spouse Faustina the Younger (145-175, her death) Issue Detail 14, including Commodus, Annius and Lucilla Full name Marcus Aelius Aurelius Verus Caesar (see section Name for details) Regnal name Imperator Caesar Marcus Aurelius Antoninus Augustus Dynasty Nerva–Antonine Father Marcus Annius Verus Antoninus Pius (adoptive) Mother Domitia Calvilla Philosophy career Notable work Meditations Era Hellenistic philosophy Region Western Philosophy School Stoicism Main interests Ethics Notable ideas Memento mori Influences Heraclitus, Socrates, Epictetus, Quintus, Apollonius, Sextus of Chaeronea Influenced Virtually all of subsequent Stoic philosophy Roman imperial dynasties Aureus of Marcus Aurelius Nerva–Antonine dynasty (AD 96–192) Chronology Nerva 96–98 Trajan 98–117 Hadrian 117–138 Antoninus Pius 138–161 Lucius Verus 161–169 Marcus Aurelius 161–180 Commodus 177–192 Family Nerva–Antonine family tree Category:Nerva–Antonine dynasty Succession Preceded by Flavian dynasty Followed by Year of the Five Emperors v t e Part of a series on Marcus Aurelius Early life (121–161 AD) Reign (161–180 AD) Meditations v t e Part of a series on Stoicism Epictetus, Seneca, and Marcus Aurelius Background Socrates Plato Aristotle Crates of Thebes Philosophy Apatheia Ekpyrosis Katalepsis Kathekon Logos Stoic logic Stoic categories Stoic passions Stoic physics Virtue ethics Stoics Zeno of Citium Cleanthes Chrysippus Panaetius Posidonius Seneca the Younger Publius Clodius Thrasea Paetus Epictetus Junius Rusticus Marcus Aurelius Stoic works Discourses of Epictetus Epistulae Morales ad Lucilium The Meditations Similar positions Cynicism Aristotelianism Middle Platonism Contrary positions Pyrrhonism Academic Skepticism Epicureanism  Philosophy portal v t e Marcus Aurelius Antoninus (/ɔːˈriːliəs/ ə-REE-lee-əs,[1] Latin: [ˈmaːrkʊs̠ au̯ˈreːlijʊs̠ an̪t̪oːˈniːnʊs̠]; 26 April 121 – 17 March 180 AD) was Roman emperor from 161 to 180 and a Stoic philosopher. He was the last of the rulers known as the Five Good Emperors (a term coined some 13 centuries later by Niccolò Machiavelli), and the last emperor of the Pax Romana, an age of relative peace and stability for the Roman Empire. He served as Roman consul in 140, 145, and 161. Marcus was born during the reign of Hadrian to the emperor's nephew, the praetor Marcus Annius Verus, and the heiress Domitia Calvilla. His father died when he was three, and his mother and grandfather raised Marcus. After Hadrian's adoptive son, Aelius Caesar, died in 138, the emperor adopted Marcus's uncle Antoninus Pius as his new heir. In turn, Antoninus adopted Marcus and Lucius, the son of Aelius. Hadrian died that year and Antoninus became emperor. Now heir to the throne, Marcus studied Greek and Latin under tutors such as Herodes Atticus and Marcus Cornelius Fronto. He kept in close correspondence with Fronto for many years afterwards. Marcus married Antoninus's daughter Faustina in 145. After Antoninus died in 161, Marcus acceded to the throne alongside his adoptive brother, who took the name Lucius Verus. The reign of Marcus Aurelius was marked by military conflict. In the East, the Roman Empire fought successfully with a revitalized Parthian Empire and the rebel Kingdom of Armenia. Marcus defeated the Marcomanni, Quadi, and Sarmatian Iazyges in the Marcomannic Wars; however, these and other Germanic peoples began to represent a troubling reality for the Empire. He modified the silver purity of the Roman currency, the denarius. The persecution of Christians in the Roman Empire appears to have increased during Marcus's reign, but his involvement in this is unknown. The Antonine Plague broke out in 165 or 166 and devastated the population of the Roman Empire, causing the deaths of five million people. Lucius Verus may have died from the plague in 169. Unlike some of his predecessors, Marcus chose not to adopt an heir. His children included Lucilla, who married Lucius, and Commodus, whose succession after Marcus has been a subject of debate among both contemporary and modern historians. The Column and Equestrian Statue of Marcus Aurelius still stand in Rome, where they were erected in celebration of his military victories. Meditations, the writings of "the philosopher" – as contemporary biographers called Marcus, are a significant source of the modern understanding of ancient Stoic philosophy. They have been praised by fellow writers, philosophers, monarchs, and politicians centuries after his death. Contents 1 Sources 2 Early life and career 2.1 Name 2.2 Family origins 2.3 Childhood 2.4 Succession to Hadrian 2.5 Heir to Antoninus Pius (138–145) 2.6 Fronto and further education 2.7 Births and deaths 2.8 Antoninus Pius's last years 3 Emperor 3.1 Accession of Marcus Aurelius and Lucius Verus (161) 3.2 Early rule 3.3 War with Parthia (161–166) 3.4 War with Germanic tribes (166–180) 3.5 Legal and administrative work 3.5.1 Trade with Han China and outbreak of plague 3.6 Death and succession (180) 4 Legacy and reputation 5 Attitude towards Christians 6 Marriage and children 7 Nerva–Antonine family tree 8 Writings 9 Equestrian Statue of Marcus Aurelius 10 Column of Marcus Aurelius 11 In popular culture 12 Notes 13 Citations 14 Sources 14.1 Ancient 14.2 Modern 15 External links Sources[edit] Bust of Marcus Aurelius in the Archaeological Museum of Istanbul, Turkey The major sources depicting the life and rule of Marcus are patchy and frequently unreliable. The most important group of sources, the biographies contained in the Historia Augusta, claimed to be written by a group of authors at the turn of the 4th century AD, but it is believed they were in fact written by a single author (referred to here as 'the biographer') from about 395 AD.[2] The later biographies and the biographies of subordinate emperors and usurpers are unreliable, but the earlier biographies, derived primarily from now-lost earlier sources (Marius Maximus or Ignotus), are much more accurate.[3] For Marcus's life and rule, the biographies of Hadrian, Antoninus, Marcus, and Lucius are largely reliable, but those of Aelius Verus and Avidius Cassius are not.[4] A body of correspondence between Marcus's tutor Fronto and various Antonine officials survives in a series of patchy manuscripts, covering the period from c. 138 to 166.[5] Marcus's own Meditations offer a window on his inner life, but are largely undateable and make few specific references to worldly affairs.[6] The main narrative source for the period is Cassius Dio, a Greek senator from Bithynian Nicaea who wrote a history of Rome from its founding to 229 in eighty books. Dio is vital for the military history of the period, but his senatorial prejudices and strong opposition to imperial expansion obscure his perspective.[7] Some other literary sources provide specific details: the writings of the physician Galen on the habits of the Antonine elite, the orations of Aelius Aristides on the temper of the times, and the constitutions preserved in the Digest and Codex Justinianeus on Marcus's legal work.[8] Inscriptions and coin finds supplement the literary sources.[9] Early life and career[edit] Main article: Early life of Marcus Aurelius A bust of young Marcus Aurelius (Capitoline Museum). Anthony Birley, his modern biographer, writes of the bust: 'This is certainly a grave young man.'[10] Name[edit] Marcus was born in Rome on 26 April 121. His name at birth was supposedly Marcus Annius Verus,[11] but some sources assign this name to him upon his father's death and unofficial adoption by his grandfather, upon his coming of age,[12][13][14] or at the time of his marriage.[15] He may have been known as Marcus Annius Catilius Severus,[16] at birth or some point in his youth,[12][14] or Marcus Catilius Severus Annius Verus. Upon his adoption by Antoninus as heir to the throne, he was known as Marcus Aelius Aurelius Verus Caesar and, upon his ascension, he was Marcus Aurelius Antoninus Augustus until his death;[17] Epiphanius of Salamis, in his chronology of the Roman emperors On Weights and Measures, calls him Marcus Aurelius Verus.[18] Family origins[edit] Marcus's paternal family was of Roman Italo-Hispanic origins. His father was Marcus Annius Verus (III).[19] The gens Annia was of Italian origins (with legendary claims of descendance from Numa Pompilius) and a branch of it moved to Ucubi, a small town south east of Córdoba in Iberian Baetica.[20][21] This branch of the Aurelii based in Roman Spain, the Annii Veri, rose to prominence in Rome in the late 1st century AD. Marcus's great-grandfather Marcus Annius Verus (I) was a senator and (according to the Historia Augusta) ex-praetor; his grandfather Marcus Annius Verus (II) was made patrician in 73–74.[22] Through his grandmother Rupilia, Marcus was a member of the Nerva-Antonine dynasty; the emperor Trajan's sororal niece Salonia Matidia was the mother of Rupilia and her half-sister, Hadrian's wife Sabina.[23][24][note 1] Marcus's mother, Domitia Lucilla Minor (also known as Domitia Calvilla), was the daughter of the Roman patrician P. Calvisius Tullus and inherited a great fortune (described at length in one of Pliny's letters) from her parents and grandparents. Her inheritance included large brickworks on the outskirts of Rome – a profitable enterprise in an era when the city was experiencing a construction boom – and the Horti Domitia Calvillae (or Lucillae), a villa on the Caelian hill of Rome.[27][28] Marcus himself was born and raised in the Horti and referred to the Caelian hill as 'My Caelian'.[29][30][31] The adoptive family of Marcus was of Roman Italo-Gallic origins: the gens Aurelia, into which Marcus was adopted at the age of 17, was a Sabine gens; Antoninus Pius, his adoptive father, came from the Aurelii Fulvi, a branch of the Aurelii based in Roman Gaul. Childhood[edit] Marcus's sister, Annia Cornificia Faustina, was probably born in 122 or 123.[32] His father probably died in 124, when Marcus was three years old during his praetorship.[33][note 2] Though he can hardly have known his father, Marcus wrote in his Meditations that he had learnt 'modesty and manliness' from his memories of his father and the man's posthumous reputation.[35] His mother Lucilla did not remarry[33] and, following prevailing aristocratic customs, probably did not spend much time with her son. Instead, Marcus was in the care of 'nurses',[36] and was raised after his father's death by his grandfather Marcus Annius Verus (II), who had always retained the legal authority of patria potestas over his son and grandson. Technically this was not an adoption, the creation of a new and different patria potestas. Lucius Catilius Severus, described as Marcus's maternal great-grandfather, also participated in his upbringing; he was probably the elder Domitia Lucilla's stepfather.[14] Marcus was raised in his parents' home on the Caelian Hill, an upscale area with few public buildings but many aristocratic villas. Marcus's grandfather owned a palace beside the Lateran, where he would spend much of his childhood.[37] Marcus thanks his grandfather for teaching him 'good character and avoidance of bad temper'.[38] He was less fond of the mistress his grandfather took and lived with after the death of his wife Rupilia.[39] Marcus was grateful that he did not have to live with her longer than he did.[40] Marcus was educated at home, in line with contemporary aristocratic trends;[41] he thanks Catilius Severus for encouraging him to avoid public schools.[42] One of his teachers, Diognetus, a painting master, proved particularly influential; he seems to have introduced Marcus Aurelius to the philosophic way of life.[43] In April 132, at the behest of Diognetus, Marcus took up the dress and habits of the philosopher: he studied while wearing a rough Greek cloak, and would sleep on the ground until his mother convinced him to sleep on a bed.[44] A new set of tutors – the Homeric scholar Alexander of Cotiaeum along with Trosius Aper and Tuticius Proculus, teachers of Latin[45][note 3] – took over Marcus's education in about 132 or 133.[47] Marcus thanks Alexander for his training in literary styling.[48] Alexander's influence – an emphasis on matter over style and careful wording, with the occasional Homeric quotation – has been detected in Marcus's Meditations.[49] Succession to Hadrian[edit] Coin (136–138 AD) of Hadrian (obverse) and his adoptive son, Lucius Aelius (reverse). Hadrian is wearing the laurel crown. Inscription: HADRIANVS ... / LVCIVS CAESAR. In late 136, Hadrian almost died from a hemorrhage. Convalescent in his villa at Tivoli, he selected Lucius Ceionius Commodus, Marcus's intended father-in-law, as his successor and adopted son,[50] according to the biographer 'against the wishes of everyone'.[51] While his motives are not certain, it would appear that his goal was to eventually place the then-too-young Marcus on the throne.[52] As part of his adoption, Commodus took the name, Lucius Aelius Caesar. His health was so poor that, during a ceremony to mark his becoming heir to the throne, he was too weak to lift a large shield on his own.[53] After a brief stationing on the Danube frontier, Aelius returned to Rome to make an address to the Senate on the first day of 138. However, the night before the speech, he grew ill and died of a hemorrhage later in the day.[54][note 4] On 24 January 138, Hadrian selected Aurelius Antoninus, the husband of Marcus's aunt Faustina the Elder, as his new successor.[56] As part of Hadrian's terms, Antoninus, in turn, adopted Marcus and Lucius Commodus, the son of Lucius Aelius.[57] Marcus became M. Aelius Aurelius Verus, and Lucius became L. Aelius Aurelius Commodus. At Hadrian's request, Antoninus's daughter Faustina was betrothed to Lucius.[58] Marcus reportedly greeted the news that Hadrian had become his adoptive grandfather with sadness, instead of joy. Only with reluctance did he move from his mother's house on the Caelian to Hadrian's private home.[59] At some time in 138, Hadrian requested in the senate that Marcus be exempt from the law barring him from becoming quaestor before his twenty-fourth birthday. The senate complied, and Marcus served under Antoninus, the consul for 139.[60] Marcus's adoption diverted him from the typical career path of his class. If not for his adoption, he probably would have become triumvir monetalis, a highly regarded post involving token administration of the state mint; after that, he could have served as tribune with a legion, becoming the legion's nominal second-in-command. Marcus probably would have opted for travel and further education instead. As it was, Marcus was set apart from his fellow citizens. Nonetheless, his biographer attests that his character remained unaffected: 'He still showed the same respect to his relations as he had when he was an ordinary citizen, and he was as thrifty and careful of his possessions as he had been when he lived in a private household'.[61] After a series of suicide attempts, all thwarted by Antoninus, Hadrian left for Baiae, a seaside resort on the Campanian coast. His condition did not improve, and he abandoned the diet prescribed by his doctors, indulging himself in food and drink. He sent for Antoninus, who was at his side when he died on 10 July 138.[62] His remains were buried quietly at Puteoli.[63] The succession to Antoninus was peaceful and stable: Antoninus kept Hadrian's nominees in office and appeased the senate, respecting its privileges and commuting the death sentences of men charged in Hadrian's last days.[64] For his dutiful behaviour, Antoninus was asked to accept the name 'Pius'.[65] Heir to Antoninus Pius (138–145)[edit] Sestertius of Antoninus Pius (AD 140–144). It celebrates the betrothal of Marcus Aurelus and Faustina the Younger in 139, pictured below Antoninus, who is holding a statuette of Concordia and clasping hands with Faustina the Elder. Inscription: ANTONINVS AVG. PIVS P. P., TR. P., CO[N]S. III / CONCORDIAE S.C.[66] Denarius of Antoninus Pius (AD 139), with a portrait of Marcus Aurelius on the reverse. Inscription: ANTONINVS AVG. PIVS P. P. / AVRELIVS CAES. AVG. PII F. CO[N]S. DES.[67] Immediately after Hadrian's death, Antoninus approached Marcus and requested that his marriage arrangements be amended: Marcus's betrothal to Ceionia Fabia would be annulled, and he would be betrothed to Faustina, Antoninus's daughter, instead. Faustina's betrothal to Ceionia's brother Lucius Commodus would also have to be annulled. Marcus consented to Antoninus's proposal.[68] He was made consul for 140 with Antoninus as his colleague, and was appointed as a seviri, one of the knights' six commanders, at the order's annual parade on 15 July 139. As the heir apparent, Marcus became princeps iuventutis, head of the equestrian order. He now took the name Marcus Aelius Aurelius Verus Caesar.[69] Marcus would later caution himself against taking the name too seriously: 'See that you do not turn into a Caesar; do not be dipped into the purple dye – for that can happen'.[70] At the senate's request, Marcus joined all the priestly colleges (pontifices, augures, quindecimviri sacris faciundis, septemviri epulonum, etc.);[71] direct evidence for membership, however, is available only for the Arval Brethren.[72] Antoninus demanded that Marcus reside in the House of Tiberius, the imperial palace on the Palatine, and take up the habits of his new station, the aulicum fastigium or 'pomp of the court', against Marcus's objections.[71] Marcus would struggle to reconcile the life of the court with his philosophic yearnings. He told himself it was an attainable goal – 'Where life is possible, then it is possible to live the right life; life is possible in a palace, so it is possible to live the right life in a palace'[73] – but he found it difficult nonetheless. He would criticize himself in the Meditations for 'abusing court life' in front of company.[74] As quaestor, Marcus would have had little real administrative work to do. He would read imperial letters to the senate when Antoninus was absent and would do secretarial work for the senators.[75] But he felt drowned in paperwork and complained to his tutor, Marcus Cornelius Fronto: 'I am so out of breath from dictating nearly thirty letters'.[76] He was being 'fitted for ruling the state', in the words of his biographer.[77] He was required to make a speech to the assembled senators as well, making oratorical training essential for the job.[78] On 1 January 145, Marcus was made consul a second time. Fronto urged him in a letter to have plenty of sleep 'so that you may come into the Senate with a good colour and read your speech with a strong voice'.[79] Marcus had complained of an illness in an earlier letter: 'As far as my strength is concerned, I am beginning to get it back; and there is no trace of the pain in my chest. But that ulcer [...][note 5] I am having treatment and taking care not to do anything that interferes with it'.[80] Never particularly healthy or strong, Marcus was praised by Cassius Dio, writing of his later years, for behaving dutifully in spite of his various illnesses.[81] In April 145, Marcus married Faustina, legally his sister, as had been planned since 138.[82] Little is specifically known of the ceremony, but the biographer calls it 'noteworthy'.[83] Coins were issued with the heads of the couple, and Antoninus, as Pontifex Maximus, would have officiated. Marcus makes no apparent reference to the marriage in his surviving letters, and only sparing references to Faustina.[84] Fronto and further education[edit] After taking the toga virilis in 136, Marcus probably began his training in oratory.[85] He had three tutors in Greek – Aninus Macer, Caninius Celer, and Herodes Atticus – and one in Latin – Fronto. The latter two were the most esteemed orators of their time,[86] but probably did not become his tutors until his adoption by Antoninus in 138. The preponderance of Greek tutors indicates the importance of the Greek language to the aristocracy of Rome.[87] This was the age of the Second Sophistic, a renaissance in Greek letters. Although educated in Rome, in his Meditations, Marcus would write his inmost thoughts in Greek.[88] Atticus was controversial: an enormously rich Athenian (probably the richest man in the eastern half of the empire), he was quick to anger and resented by his fellow Athenians for his patronizing manner.[89] Atticus was an inveterate opponent of Stoicism and philosophic pretensions.[90] He thought the Stoics' desire for apatheia was foolish: they would live a 'sluggish, enervated life', he said.[91] In spite of the influence of Atticus, Marcus would later become a Stoic. He would not mention Herodes at all in his Meditations, in spite of the fact that they would come into contact many times over the following decades.[92] Fronto was highly esteemed: in the self-consciously antiquarian world of Latin letters,[93] he was thought of as second only to Cicero, perhaps even an alternative to him.[94][note 6] He did not care much for Atticus, though Marcus was eventually to put the pair on speaking terms. Fronto exercised a complete mastery of Latin, capable of tracing expressions through the literature, producing obscure synonyms, and challenging minor improprieties in word choice.[94] A significant amount of the correspondence between Fronto and Marcus has survived.[98] The pair were very close, using intimate language such as 'Farewell my Fronto, wherever you are, my most sweet love and delight. How is it between you and me? I love you and you are not here' in their correspondence.[99] Marcus spent time with Fronto's wife and daughter, both named Cratia, and they enjoyed light conversation.[100] He wrote Fronto a letter on his birthday, claiming to love him as he loved himself, and calling on the gods to ensure that every word he learnt of literature, he would learn 'from the lips of Fronto'.[101] His prayers for Fronto's health were more than conventional, because Fronto was frequently ill; at times, he seems to be an almost constant invalid, always suffering[102] – about one-quarter of the surviving letters deal with the man's sicknesses.[103] Marcus asks that Fronto's pain be inflicted on himself, 'of my own accord with every kind of discomfort'.[104] Fronto never became Marcus's full-time teacher and continued his career as an advocate. One notorious case brought him into conflict with Atticus.[105] Marcus pleaded with Fronto, first with 'advice', then as a 'favour', not to attack Atticus; he had already asked Atticus to refrain from making the first blows.[106] Fronto replied that he was surprised to discover Marcus counted Atticus as a friend (perhaps Atticus was not yet Marcus's tutor), and allowed that Marcus might be correct,[107] but nonetheless affirmed his intent to win the case by any means necessary: '[T]he charges are frightful and must be spoken of as frightful. Those in particular that refer to the beating and robbing I will describe so that they savour of gall and bile. If I happen to call him an uneducated little Greek it will not mean war to the death'.[108] The outcome of the trial is unknown.[109] By the age of twenty-five (between April 146 and April 147), Marcus had grown disaffected with his studies in jurisprudence, and showed some signs of general malaise. His master, he writes to Fronto, was an unpleasant blowhard, and had made 'a hit at' him: 'It is easy to sit yawning next to a judge, he says, but to be a judge is noble work'.[110] Marcus had grown tired of his exercises, of taking positions in imaginary debates. When he criticized the insincerity of conventional language, Fronto took to defend it.[111] In any case, Marcus's formal education was now over. He had kept his teachers on good terms, following them devotedly. It 'affected his health adversely', his biographer writes, to have devoted so much effort to his studies. It was the only thing the biographer could find fault with in Marcus's entire boyhood.[112] Fronto had warned Marcus against the study of philosophy early on: 'It is better never to have touched the teaching of philosophy...than to have tasted it superficially, with the edge of the lips, as the saying is'.[113] He disdained philosophy and philosophers and looked down on Marcus's sessions with Apollonius of Chalcedon and others in this circle.[98] Fronto put an uncharitable interpretation of Marcus's 'conversion to philosophy': 'In the fashion of the young, tired of boring work', Marcus had turned to philosophy to escape the constant exercises of oratorical training.[114] Marcus kept in close touch with Fronto, but would ignore Fronto's scruples.[115] Apollonius may have introduced Marcus to Stoic philosophy, but Quintus Junius Rusticus would have the strongest influence on the boy.[116][note 7] He was the man Fronto recognized as having 'wooed Marcus away' from oratory.[118] He was older than Fronto and twenty years older than Marcus. As the grandson of Arulenus Rusticus, one of the martyrs to the tyranny of Domitian (r. 81–96), he was heir to the tradition of 'Stoic Opposition' to the 'bad emperors' of the 1st century;[119] the true successor of Seneca (as opposed to Fronto, the false one).[120] Marcus thanks Rusticus for teaching him 'not to be led astray into enthusiasm for rhetoric, for writing on speculative themes, for discoursing on moralizing texts.... To avoid oratory, poetry, and 'fine writing''.[121] Philostratus describes how even when Marcus was an old man, in the latter part of his reign, he studied under Sextus of Chaeronea: The Emperor Marcus was an eager disciple of Sextus the Boeotian philosopher, being often in his company and frequenting his house. Lucius, who had just come to Rome, asked the Emperor, whom he met on his way, where he was going to and on what errand, and Marcus answered, ' it is good even for an old man to learn; I am now on my way to Sextus the philosopher to learn what I do not yet know.' And Lucius, raising his hand to heaven, said, ' O Zeus, the king of the Romans in his old age takes up his tablets and goes to school.' [122] Births and deaths[edit] On 30 November 147, Faustina gave birth to a girl named Domitia Faustina. She was the first of at least thirteen children (including two sets of twins) that Faustina would bear over the next twenty-three years. The next day, 1 December, Antoninus gave Marcus the tribunician power and the imperium – authority over the armies and provinces of the emperor. As tribune, he had the right to bring one measure before the senate after the four Antoninus could introduce. His tribunician powers would be renewed with Antoninus's on 10 December 147.[123] The first mention of Domitia in Marcus's letters reveals her as a sickly infant. 'Caesar to Fronto. If the gods are willing we seem to have a hope of recovery. The diarrhea has stopped, the little attacks of fever have been driven away. But the emaciation is still extreme and there is still quite a bit of coughing'. He and Faustina, Marcus wrote, had been 'pretty occupied' with the girl's care.[124] Domitia would die in 151.[125] The Mausoleum of Hadrian, where the children of Marcus and Faustina were buried In 149, Faustina gave birth again, to twin sons. Contemporary coinage commemorates the event, with crossed cornucopiae beneath portrait busts of the two small boys, and the legend temporum felicitas, 'the happiness of the times'. They did not survive long. Before the end of the year, another family coin was issued: it shows only a tiny girl, Domitia Faustina, and one boy baby. Then another: the girl alone. The infants were buried in the Mausoleum of Hadrian, where their epitaphs survive. They were called Titus Aurelius Antoninus and Tiberius Aelius Aurelius.[126] Marcus steadied himself: 'One man prays: 'How I may not lose my little child', but you must pray: 'How I may not be afraid to lose him'.[127] He quoted from the Iliad what he called the 'briefest and most familiar saying...enough to dispel sorrow and fear':[128]  leaves, the wind scatters some on the face of the ground; like unto them are the children of men. – Iliad vi.146[128] Another daughter was born on 7 March 150, Annia Aurelia Galeria Lucilla. At some time between 155 and 161, probably soon after 155, Marcus's mother Domitia Lucilla died.[129] Faustina probably had another daughter in 151, but the child, Annia Galeria Aurelia Faustina, might not have been born until 153.[130] Another son, Tiberius Aelius Antoninus, was born in 152. A coin issue celebrates fecunditati Augustae, 'the Augusta's fertility', depicting two girls and an infant. The boy did not survive long, as evidenced by coins from 156, only depicting the two girls. He might have died in 152, the same year as Marcus's sister Cornificia.[131] By 28 March 158, when Marcus replied, another of his children was dead. Marcus thanked the temple synod, 'even though this turned out otherwise'. The child's name is unknown.[132] In 159 and 160, Faustina gave birth to daughters: Fadilla and Cornificia, named respectively after Faustina's and Marcus's dead sisters.[133] Antoninus Pius's last years[edit] Bust of Antoninus Pius, British Museum Lucius started his political career as a quaestor in 153. He was consul in 154,[134] and was consul again with Marcus in 161.[135] Lucius had no other titles, except that of 'son of Augustus'. Lucius had a markedly different personality from Marcus: he enjoyed sports of all kinds, but especially hunting and wrestling; he took obvious pleasure in the circus games and gladiatorial fights.[136][note 8] He did not marry until 164.[140] In 156, Antoninus turned 70. He found it difficult to keep himself upright without stays. He started nibbling on dry bread to give him the strength to stay awake through his morning receptions. As Antoninus aged, Marcus would take on more administrative duties, more still when he became the praetorian prefect (an office that was as much secretarial as military) when Marcus Gavius Maximus died in 156 or 157.[141] In 160, Marcus and Lucius were designated joint consuls for the following year. Antoninus may have already been ill.[133] Two days before his death, the biographer reports, Antoninus was at his ancestral estate at Lorium, in Etruria,[142] about 19 kilometres (12 mi) from Rome.[143] He ate Alpine cheese at dinner quite greedily. In the night he vomited; he had a fever the next day. The day after that, 7 March 161,[144] he summoned the imperial council, and passed the state and his daughter to Marcus. The emperor gave the keynote to his life in the last word that he uttered when the tribune of the night-watch came to ask the password – 'aequanimitas' (equanimity).[145] He then turned over, as if going to sleep, and died.[146] His death closed out the longest reign since Augustus, surpassing Tiberius by a couple of months.[147] Emperor[edit] Main article: Reign of Marcus Aurelius Accession of Marcus Aurelius and Lucius Verus (161)[edit] Busts of the co-emperors Marcus Aurelius (left) and Lucius Verus (right), British Museum After Antoninus died in 161, Marcus was effectively sole ruler of the Empire. The formalities of the position would follow. The senate would soon grant him the name Augustus and the title imperator, and he would soon be formally elected as Pontifex Maximus, chief priest of the official cults. Marcus made some show of resistance: the biographer writes that he was 'compelled' to take imperial power.[148] This may have been a genuine horror imperii, 'fear of imperial power'. Marcus, with his preference for the philosophic life, found the imperial office unappealing. His training as a Stoic, however, had made the choice clear to him that it was his duty.[149] Although Marcus showed no personal affection for Hadrian (significantly, he does not thank him in the first book of his Meditations), he presumably believed it his duty to enact the man's succession plans.[150] Thus, although the senate planned to confirm Marcus alone, he refused to take office unless Lucius received equal powers.[151] The senate accepted, granting Lucius the imperium, the tribunician power, and the name Augustus.[152] Marcus became, in official titulature, Imperator Caesar Marcus Aurelius Antoninus Augustus; Lucius, forgoing his name Commodus and taking Marcus's family name Verus, became Imperator Caesar Lucius Aurelius Verus Augustus.[153][note 9] It was the first time that Rome was ruled by two emperors.[156][note 10] In spite of their nominal equality, Marcus held more auctoritas, or 'authority', than Lucius. He had been consul once more than Lucius, he had shared in Antoninus's rule, and he alone was Pontifex Maximus. It would have been clear to the public which emperor was the more senior.[156] As the biographer wrote, 'Verus obeyed Marcus...as a lieutenant obeys a proconsul or a governor obeys the emperor'.[157] Immediately after their senate confirmation, the emperors proceeded to the Castra Praetoria, the camp of the Praetorian Guard. Lucius addressed the assembled troops, which then acclaimed the pair as imperatores. Then, like every new emperor since Claudius, Lucius promised the troops a special donative.[158] This donative, however, was twice the size of those past: 20,000 sesterces (5,000 denarii) per capita, with more to officers. In return for this bounty, equivalent to several years' pay, the troops swore an oath to protect the emperors.[159] The ceremony was perhaps not entirely necessary, given that Marcus's accession had been peaceful and unopposed, but it was good insurance against later military troubles.[160] Upon his accession he also devalued the Roman currency. He decreased the silver purity of the denarius from 83.5% to 79% – the silver weight dropping from 2.68 g (0.095 oz) to 2.57 g (0.091 oz).[161] Antoninus's funeral ceremonies were, in the words of the biographer, 'elaborate'.[162] If his funeral followed those of his predecessors, his body would have been incinerated on a pyre at the Campus Martius, and his spirit would have been seen as ascending to the gods' home in the heavens. Marcus and Lucius nominated their father for deification. In contrast to their behaviour during Antoninus's campaign to deify Hadrian, the senate did not oppose the emperors' wishes. A flamen, or cultic priest, was appointed to minister the cult of the deified Divus Antoninus. Antoninus's remains were laid to rest in Hadrian's mausoleum, beside the remains of Marcus's children and of Hadrian himself.[163] The temple he had dedicated to his wife, Diva Faustina, became the Temple of Antoninus and Faustina. It survives as the church of San Lorenzo in Miranda.[160] In accordance with his will, Antoninus's fortune passed on to Faustina.[164] (Marcus had little need of his wife's fortune. Indeed, at his accession, Marcus transferred part of his mother's estate to his nephew, Ummius Quadratus.[165]) Faustina was three months pregnant at her husband's accession. During the pregnancy she dreamed of giving birth to two serpents, one fiercer than the other.[166] On 31 August, she gave birth at Lanuvium to twins: T. Aurelius Fulvus Antoninus and Lucius Aurelius Commodus.[167][note 11] Aside from the fact that the twins shared Caligula's birthday, the omens were favorable, and the astrologers drew positive horoscopes for the children.[169] The births were celebrated on the imperial coinage.[170] Early rule[edit] Soon after the emperors' accession, Marcus's eleven-year-old daughter, Annia Lucilla, was betrothed to Lucius (in spite of the fact that he was, formally, her uncle).[171] At the ceremonies commemorating the event, new provisions were made for the support of poor children, along the lines of earlier imperial foundations.[172] Marcus and Lucius proved popular with the people of Rome, who strongly approved of their civiliter ('lacking pomp') behaviour. The emperors permitted free speech, evidenced by the fact that the comedy writer Marullus was able to criticize them without suffering retribution. As the biographer wrote, 'No one missed the lenient ways of Pius'.[173] Marcus replaced a number of the empire's major officials. The ab epistulis Sextus Caecilius Crescens Volusianus, in charge of the imperial correspondence, was replaced with Titus Varius Clemens. Clemens was from the frontier province of Pannonia and had served in the war in Mauretania. Recently, he had served as procurator of five provinces. He was a man suited for a time of military crisis.[174] Lucius Volusius Maecianus, Marcus's former tutor, had been prefectural governor of Egypt at Marcus's accession. Maecianus was recalled, made senator, and appointed prefect of the treasury (aerarium Saturni). He was made consul soon after.[175] Fronto's son-in-law, Gaius Aufidius Victorinus, was appointed governor of Germania Superior.[176] Fronto returned to his Roman townhouse at dawn on 28 March, having left his home in Cirta as soon as news of his pupils' accession reached him. He sent a note to the imperial freedman Charilas, asking if he could call on the emperors. Fronto would later explain that he had not dared to write the emperors directly.[177] The tutor was immensely proud of his students. Reflecting on the speech he had written on taking his consulship in 143, when he had praised the young Marcus, Fronto was ebullient: 'There was then an outstanding natural ability in you; there is now perfected excellence. There was then a crop of growing corn; there is now a ripe, gathered harvest. What I was hoping for then, I have now. The hope has become a reality.'[178] Fronto called on Marcus alone; neither thought to invite Lucius.[179] Lucius was less esteemed by Fronto than his brother, as his interests were on a lower level. Lucius asked Fronto to adjudicate in a dispute he and his friend Calpurnius were having on the relative merits of two actors.[180] Marcus told Fronto of his reading – Coelius and a little Cicero – and his family. His daughters were in Rome with their great-great-aunt Matidia; Marcus thought the evening air of the country was too cold for them. He asked Fronto for 'some particularly eloquent reading matter, something of your own, or Cato, or Cicero, or Sallust or Gracchus – or some poet, for I need distraction, especially in this kind of way, by reading something that will uplift and diffuse my pressing anxieties.'[181] Marcus's early reign proceeded smoothly; he was able to give himself wholly to philosophy and the pursuit of popular affection.[182] Soon, however, he would find he had many anxieties. It would mean the end of the felicitas temporum ('happy times') that the coinage of 161 had proclaimed.[183] Tiber Island seen at a forty-year high-water mark of the Tiber, December 2008 In either autumn 161 or spring 162,[note 12] the Tiber overflowed its banks, flooding much of Rome. It drowned many animals, leaving the city in famine. Marcus and Lucius gave the crisis their personal attention.[185][note 13] In other times of famine, the emperors are said to have provided for the Italian communities out of the Roman granaries.[187] Fronto's letters continued through Marcus's early reign. Fronto felt that, because of Marcus's prominence and public duties, lessons were more important now than they had ever been before. He believed Marcus was 'beginning to feel the wish to be eloquent once more, in spite of having for a time lost interest in eloquence'.[188] Fronto would again remind his pupil of the tension between his role and his philosophic pretensions: 'Suppose, Caesar, that you can attain to the wisdom of Cleanthes and Zeno, yet, against your will, not the philosopher's woolen cape'.[189] The early days of Marcus's reign were the happiest of Fronto's life: Marcus was beloved by the people of Rome, an excellent emperor, a fond pupil, and perhaps most importantly, as eloquent as could be wished.[190] Marcus had displayed rhetorical skill in his speech to the senate after an earthquake at Cyzicus. It had conveyed the drama of the disaster, and the senate had been awed: 'Not more suddenly or violently was the city stirred by the earthquake than the minds of your hearers by your speech'. Fronto was hugely pleased.[191] War with Parthia (161–166)[edit] Main article: Roman–Parthian War of 161–166 See also: Roman–Persian Wars Coin of Vologases IV of Parthia. Inscription: above ΒΑΣΙΛΕΩΣ ΒΑΣΙΛΕΩΝ ΔΟΥ, right ΑΡΣΑΚΟΥ ΒΟΛΑΓΑΣΟΥ, left ΕΠΙΦΑΝΟΥΣ ΦΙΛΕΛΛΗΝΟΣ, below ΔΙΟΥ (Greek inscription for KING OF KINGS – ARSAKIS VOLAGASES – ILLUSTRIUS PHILELLENE). Year ΔΟΥ = ΥΟΔ΄ = 474 = 162–63. On his deathbed, Antoninus spoke of nothing but the state and the foreign kings who had wronged him.[192] One of those kings, Vologases IV of Parthia, made his move in late summer or early autumn 161.[193] Vologases entered the Kingdom of Armenia (then a Roman client state), expelled its king and installed his own – Pacorus, an Arsacid like himself.[194] The governor of Cappadocia, the frontline in all Armenian conflicts, was Marcus Sedatius Severianus, a Gaul with much experience in military matters.[195] Convinced by the prophet Alexander of Abonutichus that he could defeat the Parthians easily and win glory for himself,[196] Severianus led a legion (perhaps the IX Hispana[197]) into Armenia, but was trapped by the great Parthian general Chosrhoes at Elegeia, a town just beyond the Cappadocian frontiers, high up past the headwaters of the Euphrates. After Severianus made some unsuccessful efforts to engage Chosrhoes, he committed suicide, and his legion was massacred. The campaign had lasted only three days.[198] There was threat of war on other frontiers as well – in Britain, and in Raetia and Upper Germany, where the Chatti of the Taunus mountains had recently crossed over the limes.[199] Marcus was unprepared. Antoninus seems to have given him no military experience; the biographer writes that Marcus spent the whole of Antoninus's twenty-three-year reign at his emperor's side and not in the provinces, where most previous emperors had spent their early careers.[200][note 14] More bad news arrived: the Syrian governor's army had been defeated by the Parthians, and retreated in disarray.[202] Reinforcements were dispatched for the Parthian frontier. P. Julius Geminius Marcianus, an African senator commanding X Gemina at Vindobona (Vienna), left for Cappadocia with detachments from the Danubian legions.[203] Three full legions were also sent east: I Minervia from Bonn in Upper Germany,[204] II Adiutrix from Aquincum,[205] and V Macedonica from Troesmis.[206] The northern frontiers were strategically weakened; frontier governors were told to avoid conflict wherever possible.[207] M. Annius Libo, Marcus's first cousin, was sent to replace the Syrian governor. His first consulship was in 161, so he was probably in his early thirties,[208] and as a patrician, he lacked military experience. Marcus had chosen a reliable man rather than a talented one.[209] Aureus of Marcus Aurelius (AD 166). On the reverse, Victoria is holding a shield inscribed 'VIC(toria) PAR(thica)', referring to his victory against the Parthians. Inscription: M. ANTONINVS AVG. / TR. P. XX, IMP. IIII, CO[N]S. III.[210] Marcus took a four-day public holiday at Alsium, a resort town on the coast of Etruria. He was too anxious to relax. Writing to Fronto, he declared that he would not speak about his holiday.[211] Fronto replied: 'What? Do I not know that you went to Alsium with the intention of devoting yourself to games, joking, and complete leisure for four whole days?'[212] He encouraged Marcus to rest, calling on the example of his predecessors (Antoninus had enjoyed exercise in the palaestra, fishing, and comedy),[213] going so far as to write up a fable about the gods' division of the day between morning and evening – Marcus had apparently been spending most of his evenings on judicial matters instead of at leisure.[214] Marcus could not take Fronto's advice. 'I have duties hanging over me that can hardly be begged off', he wrote back.[215] Marcus Aurelius put on Fronto's voice to chastise himself: ''Much good has my advice done you', you will say!' He had rested, and would rest often, but 'this devotion to duty! Who knows better than you how demanding it is!'[216] The dissolute Syrian army spent more time in Antioch's open-air taverns than with their units.[217] (Engraving by William Miller after a drawing by H. Warren from a sketch by Captain Byam Martin, R.N., 1866) The Euphrates River near Raqqa, Syria Fronto sent Marcus a selection of reading material,[218] and, to settle his unease over the course of the Parthian war, a long and considered letter, full of historical references. In modern editions of Fronto's works, it is labeled De bello Parthico (On the Parthian War). There had been reverses in Rome's past, Fronto writes,[219] but in the end, Romans had always prevailed over their enemies: 'Always and everywhere [Mars] has changed our troubles into successes and our terrors into triumphs'.[220] Over the winter of 161–162, news that a rebellion was brewing in Syria arrived and it was decided that Lucius should direct the Parthian war in person. He was stronger and healthier than Marcus, the argument went, and thus more suited to military activity.[221] Lucius's biographer suggests ulterior motives: to restrain Lucius's debaucheries, to make him thrifty, to reform his morals by the terror of war, and to realize that he was an emperor.[222][note 15] Whatever the case, the senate gave its assent, and, in the summer of 162, Lucius left. Marcus would remain in Rome, as the city 'demanded the presence of an emperor'.[224] Lucius spent most of the campaign in Antioch, though he wintered at Laodicea and summered at Daphne, a resort just outside Antioch.[225] Critics declaimed Lucius's luxurious lifestyle,[226] saying that he had taken to gambling, would 'dice the whole night through',[227] and enjoyed the company of actors.[228][note 16] Libo died early in the war; perhaps Lucius had murdered him.[230] Marble statue of Lucilla, 150–200 AD, Bardo National Museum, Tunisia In the middle of the war, perhaps in autumn 163 or early 164, Lucius made a trip to Ephesus to be married to Marcus's daughter Lucilla.[231] Marcus moved up the date; perhaps he had already heard of Lucius's mistress Panthea.[232] Lucilla's thirteenth birthday was in March 163; whatever the date of her marriage, she was not yet fifteen.[233] Lucilla was accompanied by her mother Faustina and Lucius's uncle (his father's half-brother) M. Vettulenus Civica Barbarus,[234] who was made comes Augusti, 'companion of the emperors'. Marcus may have wanted Civica to watch over Lucius, the job Libo had failed at.[235] Marcus may have planned to accompany them all the way to Smyrna (the biographer says he told the senate he would), but this did not happen.[236] He only accompanied the group as far as Brundisium, where they boarded a ship for the east.[237] He returned to Rome immediately thereafter, and sent out special instructions to his proconsuls not to give the group any official reception.[238] The Armenian capital Artaxata was captured in 163.[239] At the end of the year, Lucius took the title Armeniacus, despite having never seen combat; Marcus declined to accept the title until the following year.[240] When Lucius was hailed as imperator again, however, Marcus did not hesitate to take the Imperator II with him.[241] Occupied Armenia was reconstructed on Roman terms. In 164, a new capital, Kaine Polis ('New City'), replaced Artaxata.[242] A new king was installed: a Roman senator of consular rank and Arsacid descent, Gaius Julius Sohaemus. He may not even have been crowned in Armenia; the ceremony may have taken place in Antioch, or even Ephesus.[243] Sohaemus was hailed on the imperial coinage of 164 under the legend Rex armeniis Datus: Lucius sat on a throne with his staff while Sohaemus stood before him, saluting the emperor.[244] In 163, the Parthians intervened in Osroene, a Roman client in upper Mesopotamia centred on Edessa, and installed their own king on its throne.[245] In response, Roman forces were moved downstream, to cross the Euphrates at a more southerly point.[246] Before the end of 163, however, Roman forces had moved north to occupy Dausara and Nicephorium on the northern, Parthian bank.[247] Soon after the conquest of the north bank of the Euphrates, other Roman forces moved on Osroene from Armenia, taking Anthemusia, a town southwest of Edessa.[248] In 165, Roman forces moved on Mesopotamia. Edessa was re-occupied, and Mannus, the king deposed by the Parthians, was re-installed.[249] The Parthians retreated to Nisibis, but this too was besieged and captured. The Parthian army dispersed in the Tigris.[250] A second force, under Avidius Cassius and the III Gallica, moved down the Euphrates, and fought a major battle at Dura.[251] By the end of the year, Cassius's army had reached the twin metropolises of Mesopotamia: Seleucia on the right bank of the Tigris and Ctesiphon on the left. Ctesiphon was taken and its royal palace set to flame. The citizens of Seleucia, still largely Greek (the city had been commissioned and settled as a capital of the Seleucid Empire, one of Alexander the Great's successor kingdoms), opened its gates to the invaders. The city was sacked nonetheless, leaving a black mark on Lucius's reputation. Excuses were sought, or invented: the official version had it that the Seleucids broke faith first.[252] Cassius's army, although suffering from a shortage of supplies and the effects of a plague contracted in Seleucia, made it back to Roman territory safely.[253] Lucius took the title Parthicus Maximus, and he and Marcus were hailed as imperatores again, earning the title 'imp. III'.[254] Cassius's army returned to the field in 166, crossing over the Tigris into Media. Lucius took the title 'Medicus',[255] and the emperors were again hailed as imperatores, becoming 'imp. IV' in imperial titulature. Marcus took the Parthicus Maximus now, after another tactful delay.[256] On 12 October of that year, Marcus proclaimed two of his sons, Annius and Commodus, as his heirs.[257] War with Germanic tribes (166–180)[edit] Main article: Marcomannic Wars The Roman Empire at the death of Marcus Aurelius in 180, represented in purple. His annexation of lands of the Marcomanni and the Jazyges – perhaps to be provincially called Marcomannia and Sarmatia[258] – was cut short in 175 by the revolt of Avidius Cassius and by his death.[259] The light pink territory represents Roman dependencies: Armenia, Colchis, Iberia, and Albania. Scenes from the Marcomannic Wars, 176–180 AD (bas reliefs from the Arch of Marcus Aurelius, now in the Capitoline Museums) Marcus Aurelius receiving the submission of the vanquished, with raised vexillum standards Marcus Aurelius celebrating his triumph over Rome's enemies in 176 AD, riding in a quadriga chariot Bronze medallion of Marcus Aurelius (AD 168). The reverse depicts Jupiter, flanked by Marcus and Lucius Verus. Inscription: M. ANTONINVS AVG. ARM. PARTH. MAX. / TR. P. XXII, IMP. IIII, COS III.[260] Aureus of Marcus Aurelius (AD 176–177). The pile of trophies on the reverse celebrates the end of the Marcomannic Wars. Inscription: M. ANTONINVS AVG. GERM. SARM. / TR. P. XXXI, IMP. VIII, CO[N]S. III, P. P.[261] During the early 160s, Fronto's son-in-law Victorinus was stationed as a legate in Germany. He was there with his wife and children (another child had stayed with Fronto and his wife in Rome).[262] The condition on the northern frontier looked grave. A frontier post had been destroyed, and it looked like all the peoples of central and northern Europe were in turmoil. There was corruption among the officers: Victorinus had to ask for the resignation of a legionary legate who was taking bribes.[263] Experienced governors had been replaced by friends and relatives of the imperial family. Lucius Dasumius Tullius Tuscus, a distant relative of Hadrian, was in Upper Pannonia, succeeding the experienced Marcus Nonius Macrinus. Lower Pannonia was under the obscure Tiberius Haterius Saturnius. Marcus Servilius Fabianus Maximus was shuffled from Lower Moesia to Upper Moesia when Marcus Iallius Bassus had joined Lucius in Antioch. Lower Moesia was filled by Pontius Laelianus's son. The Dacias were still divided in three, governed by a praetorian senator and two procurators. The peace could not hold long; Lower Pannonia did not even have a legion.[264] Starting in the 160s, Germanic tribes, and other nomadic people launched raids along the northern border, particularly into Gaul and across the Danube. This new impetus westwards was probably due to attacks from tribes further east. A first invasion of the Chatti in the province of Germania Superior was repulsed in 162.[265] Far more dangerous was the invasion of 166, when the Marcomanni of Bohemia, clients of the Roman Empire since 19 AD, crossed the Danube together with the Lombards and other Germanic tribes.[266] Soon thereafter, the Iranian Sarmatian Iazyges attacked between the Danube and the Theiss rivers.[267] The Costoboci, coming from the Carpathian area, invaded Moesia, Macedonia, and Greece. After a long struggle, Marcus managed to push back the invaders. Numerous members of Germanic tribes settled in frontier regions like Dacia, Pannonia, Germany, and Italy itself. This was not a new thing, but this time the numbers of settlers required the creation of two new frontier provinces on the left shore of the Danube, Sarmatia and Marcomannia, including today's Czechia, Slovakia, and Hungary. Some Germanic tribes who settled in Ravenna revolted and managed to seize possession of the city. For this reason, Marcus decided not only against bringing more barbarians into Italy, but even banished those who had previously been brought there.[268] Legal and administrative work[edit] Bust of Marcus Aurelius in the Liebieghaus, Frankfurt. Like many emperors, Marcus spent most of his time addressing matters of law such as petitions and hearing disputes,[269] but unlike many of his predecessors, he was already proficient in imperial administration when he assumed power.[270] He took great care in the theory and practice of legislation. Professional jurists called him 'an emperor most skilled in the law'[271] and 'a most prudent and conscientiously just emperor'.[272] He showed marked interest in three areas of the law: the manumission of slaves, the guardianship of orphans and minors, and the choice of city councillors (decuriones).[273] Marcus showed a great deal of respect to the Roman Senate and routinely asked them for permission to spend money even though he did not need to do so as the absolute ruler of the Empire.[274] In one speech, Marcus himself reminded the Senate that the imperial palace where he lived was not truly his possession but theirs.[275] In 168, he revalued the denarius, increasing the silver purity from 79% to 82% – the actual silver weight increasing from 2.57–2.67 g (0.091–0.094 oz). However, two years later he reverted to the previous values because of the military crises facing the empire.[161] Trade with Han China and outbreak of plague[edit] Main articles: Sino-Roman relations and Antonine Plague A possible contact with Han China occurred in 166 when a Roman traveller visited the Han court, claiming to be an ambassador representing a certain Andun (Chinese: 安 敦), ruler of Daqin, who can be identified either with Marcus or his predecessor Antoninus.[276][277][278] In addition to Republican-era Roman glasswares found at Guangzhou along the South China Sea,[279] Roman golden medallions made during the reign of Antoninus and perhaps even Marcus have been found at Óc Eo, Vietnam, then part of the Kingdom of Funan near the Chinese province of Jiaozhi (in northern Vietnam). This may have been the port city of Kattigara, described by Ptolemy (c. 150) as being visited by a Greek sailor named Alexander and lying beyond the Golden Chersonese (i.e. Malay Peninsula).[280][note 17] Roman coins from the reigns of Tiberius to Aurelian have been found in Xi'an, China (site of the Han capital Chang'an), although the far greater amount of Roman coins in India suggests the Roman maritime trade for purchasing Chinese silk was centred there, not in China or even the overland Silk Road running through Persia.[281] The Antonine Plague started in Mesopotamia in 165 or 166 at the end of Lucius's campaign against the Parthians. It may have continued into the reign of Commodus. Galen, who was in Rome when the plague spread to the city in 166,[282] mentioned that 'fever, diarrhoea, and inflammation of the pharynx, along with dry or pustular eruptions of the skin after nine days' were among the symptoms.[283] It is believed that the plague was smallpox.[284] In the view of historian Rafe de Crespigny, the plagues afflicting the Eastern Han empire of China during the reigns of Emperor Huan of Han (r. 146–168) and Emperor Ling of Han (r. 168–189), which struck in 151, 161, 171, 173, 179, 182, and 185, were perhaps connected to the plague in Rome.[285] Raoul McLaughlin writes that the travel of Roman subjects to the Han Chinese court in 166 may have started a new era of Roman–Far East trade. However, it was also a 'harbinger of something much more ominous'. According to McLaughlin, the disease caused 'irreparable' damage to the Roman maritime trade in the Indian Ocean as proven by the archaeological record spanning from Egypt to India, as well as significantly decreased Roman commercial activity in Southeast Asia.[286] Death and succession (180)[edit] Last Words of the Emperor Marcus Aurelius (1844) by Eugène Delacroix Marcus died at the age of 58 on 17 March 180 due to unknown causes in near military quarters near the city of Sirmium in Pannonia (modern Sremska Mitrovica). He was immediately deified and his ashes were returned to Rome, where they rested in Hadrian's mausoleum (modern Castel Sant'Angelo) until the Visigoth sack of the city in 410. His campaigns against Germans and Sarmatians were also commemorated by a column and a temple built in Rome.[287] Some scholars consider his death to be the end of the Pax Romana.[288] Marcus was succeeded by his son Commodus, whom he had named Caesar in 166 and with whom he had jointly ruled since 177.[289] Biological sons of the emperor, if there were any, were considered heirs;[290] however, it was only the second time that a "non-adoptive" son had succeeded his father, the only other having been a century earlier when Vespasian was succeeded by his son Titus. Historians have criticized the succession to Commodus, citing Commodus's erratic behaviour and lack of political and military acumen.[289] At the end of his history of Marcus's reign, Cassius Dio wrote an encomium to the emperor, and described the transition to Commodus in his own lifetime with sorrow:[291] [Marcus] did not meet with the good fortune that he deserved, for he was not strong in body and was involved in a multitude of troubles throughout practically his entire reign. But for my part, I admire him all the more for this very reason, that amid unusual and extraordinary difficulties he both survived himself and preserved the empire. Just one thing prevented him from being completely happy, namely, that after rearing and educating his son in the best possible way he was vastly disappointed in him. This matter must be our next topic; for our history now descends from a kingdom of gold to one of iron and rust, as affairs did for the Romans of that day. –Dio lxxi. 36.3–4[291] Dio adds that from Marcus's first days as counsellor to Antoninus to his final days as emperor of Rome, "he remained the same [person] and did not change in the least."[292] Michael Grant, in The Climax of Rome, writes of Commodus:[293] The youth turned out to be very erratic, or at least so anti-traditional that disaster was inevitable. But whether or not Marcus ought to have known this to be so, the rejections of his son's claims in favour of someone else would almost certainly have involved one of the civil wars which were to proliferate so disastrously around future successions.[293] Legacy and reputation[edit] Marcus acquired the reputation of a philosopher king within his lifetime, and the title would remain after his death; both Dio and the biographer call him 'the philosopher'.[294][295] Christians such as Justin Martyr, Athenagoras, and Eusebius also gave him the title.[296] The last named went so far as to call him "more philanthropic and philosophic" than Antoninus and Hadrian, and set him against the persecuting emperors Domitian and Nero to make the contrast bolder.[297] The historian Herodian wrote: "Alone of the emperors, he gave proof of his learning not by mere words or knowledge of philosophical doctrines but by his blameless character and temperate way of life."[298] Iain King explains that Marcus's legacy was tragic: "[The emperor's] Stoic philosophy – which is about self-restraint, duty, and respect for others – was so abjectly abandoned by the imperial line he anointed on his death."[299] Attitude towards Christians[edit] In the first two centuries of the Christian era, it was local Roman officials who were largely responsible for the persecution of Christians. In the second century, the emperors treated Christianity as a local problem to be dealt with by their subordinates.[300] The number and severity of persecutions of Christians in various locations of the empire seemingly increased during the reign of Marcus. The extent to which Marcus himself directed, encouraged, or was aware of these persecutions is unclear and much debated by historians.[301] The early Christian apologist, Justin Martyr, includes within his First Apology (written between 140 and 150 A.D.) a letter from Marcus Aurelius to the Roman senate (prior to his reign) describing a battlefield incident in which Marcus believed Christian prayer had saved his army from thirst when "water poured from heaven," after which, "immediately we recognized the presence of God." Marcus goes on to request the senate desist from earlier courses of Christian persecution by Rome.[302] Marriage and children[edit] Coin of Commodus and Annius, 161–165. Inscription: [ΝΕΩ]ΚΟΡΟΙ CΕΒΑCΤΟΥ i.e. the city (of Tarsus in Cilicia) had a temple of Augustus. Bust of Vibia Aurelia Sabina, Prado Museum Marcus and his cousin-wife Faustina had at least 13 children during their 30-year marriage,[123][303] including two sets of twins.[123][304] One son and four daughters outlived their father.[305] Their children included: Domitia Faustina (147–151)[123][135][306] Titus Aelius Antoninus (149)[126][304][307] Titus Aelius Aurelius (149)[126][304][307] Annia Aurelia Galeria Lucilla (150[129][306]–182[308]), married her father's co-ruler Lucius Verus,[135] then Tiberius Claudius Pompeianus, had issue from both marriages Annia Galeria Aurelia Faustina (born 151),[131] married Gnaeus Claudius Severus, had a son Tiberius Aelius Antoninus (born 152, died before 156)[131] Unknown child (died before 158)[133] Annia Aurelia Fadilla (born 159[306][133]),[135] married Marcus Peducaeus Plautius Quintillus, had issue Annia Cornificia Faustina Minor (born 160[306][133]),[135] married Marcus Petronius Sura Mamertinus, had a son Titus Aurelius Fulvus Antoninus (161–165), elder twin brother of Commodus[307] Lucius Aurelius Commodus Antoninus (Commodus) (161–192),[309] twin brother of Titus Aurelius Fulvus Antoninus, later emperor,[307][310] married Bruttia Crispina, no issue Marcus Annius Verus Caesar (162[257]–169[303][311])[135] Hadrianus[135] Vibia Aurelia Sabina (170[307]– died before 217[312]),[135] married Lucius Antistius Burrus, no issue Nerva–Antonine family tree[edit] v t e Nerva–Antonine family tree Q. Marcius Barea Soranus Q. Marcius Barea Sura Antonia Furnilla M. Cocceius Nerva Sergia Plautilla P. Aelius Hadrianus Titus (r. 79–81) Marcia Furnilla Marcia Trajanus Pater Nerva (r. 96–98) Ulpia[i] Aelius Hadrianus Marullinus Julia Flavia[ii] Marciana[iii] C. Salonius Matidius[iv] Trajan (r. 98–117) Plotina P. Acilius Attianus P. Aelius Afer[v] Paulina Major[vi] Lucius Mindius (2) Libo Rupilius Frugi (3) Matidia[vii] L. Vibius Sabinus (1)[viii] Paulina Minor[vi] L. Julius Ursus Servianus[ix] Matidia Minor[vii] Suetonius?[x] Sabina[iii] Hadrian[v][xi][vi] (r. 117–138) Antinous[xii] Julia Balbilla?[xiii] C. Fuscus Salinator I Julia Serviana Paulina M. Annius Verus[xiv] Rupilia Faustina[xv] Boionia Procilla Cn. Arrius Antoninus L. Ceionius Commodus Appia Severa C. Fuscus Salinator II L. Caesennius Paetus Arria Antonina Arria Fadilla[xvi] T. Aurelius Fulvus L. Caesennius Antoninus L. Commodus Fundania Plautia ignota[xvii] C. Avidius Nigrinus M. Annius Verus[xv] Domitia Calvilla[xviii] Fundania[xix] M. Annius Libo[xv] FAUSTINA[xvi] Antoninus Pius (r. 138–161)[xvi] L. Aelius Caesar[xvii] Avidia Plautia[xvii] Cornificia[xv] MARCUS AURELIUS (r. 161–180)[xx] FAUSTINA Minor[xx] C. Avidius Cassius[xxi] Aurelia Fadilla[xvi] LUCIUS VERUS (r. 161–169)[xvii] (1) Ceionia Fabia[xvii] Plautius Quintillus[xxii] Q. Servilius Pudens Ceionia Plautia[xvii] Cornificia Minor[xxiii] M. Petronius Sura COMMODUS (r. 177–192)[xx] Fadilla[xxiii] M. Annius Verus Caesar[xx] Ti. Claudius Pompeianus (2) Lucilla[xx] M. Plautius Quintillus[xvii] Junius Licinius Balbus Servilia Ceionia Petronius Antoninus L. Aurelius Agaclytus (2) Aurelia Sabina[xxiii] L. Antistius Burrus (1) Plautius Quintillus Plautia Servilla C. Furius Sabinus Timesitheus Antonia Gordiana Junius Licinius Balbus? Furia Sabina Tranquillina GORDIAN III (r. 238–244) (1) = 1st spouse (2) = 2nd spouse (3) = 3rd spouse   Reddish purple indicates emperor of the Nerva-Antonine dynasty   lighter purple indicates designated imperial heir of said dynasty who never reigned   grey indicates unsuccessful imperial aspirants   bluish purple indicates emperors of other dynasties dashed lines indicate adoption; dotted lines indicate love affairs/unmarried relationships small caps = posthumously deified (Augusti, Augustae, or other) Notes: Except where otherwise noted, the notes below indicate that an individual's parentage is as shown in the above family tree. ^ Sister of Trajan's father: Giacosa (1977), p. 7. ^ Giacosa (1977), p. 8. ^ a b Levick (2014), p. 161. ^ Husband of Ulpia Marciana: Levick (2014), p. 161. ^ a b Giacosa (1977), p. 7. ^ a b c DIR contributor (Herbert W. Benario, 2000), "Hadrian". ^ a b Giacosa (1977), p. 9. ^ Husband of Salonia Matidia: Levick (2014), p. 161. ^ Smith (1870), "Julius Servianus".[dead link] ^ Suetonius a possible lover of Sabina: One interpretation of HA Hadrianus 11:3 ^ Smith (1870), "Hadrian", pp. 319–322.[dead link] ^ Lover of Hadrian: Lambert (1984), p. 99 and passim; deification: Lamber (1984), pp. 2–5, etc. ^ Julia Balbilla a possible lover of Sabina: A. R. Birley (1997), Hadrian, the Restless Emperor, p. 251, cited in Levick (2014), p. 30, who is sceptical of this suggestion. ^ Husband of Rupilia Faustina: Levick (2014), p. 163. ^ a b c d Levick (2014), p. 163. ^ a b c d Levick (2014), p. 162. ^ a b c d e f g Levick (2014), p. 164. ^ Wife of M. Annius Verus: Giacosa (1977), p. 10. ^ Wife of M. Annius Libo: Levick (2014), p. 163. ^ a b c d e Giacosa (1977), p. 10. ^ The epitomator of Cassius Dio (72.22) gives the story that Faustina the Elder promised to marry Avidius Cassius. This is also echoed in HA "Marcus Aurelius" 24. ^ Husband of Ceionia Fabia: Levick (2014), p. 164. ^ a b c Levick (2014), p. 117. References: DIR contributors (2000). "De Imperatoribus Romanis: An Online Encyclopedia of Roman Rulers and Their Families". Retrieved 14 April 2015. Giacosa, Giorgio (1977). Women of the Caesars: Their Lives and Portraits on Coins. Translated by R. Ross Holloway. Milan: Edizioni Arte e Moneta. ISBN 0-8390-0193-2. Lambert, Royston (1984). Beloved and God: The Story of Hadrian and Antinous. New York: Viking. ISBN 0-670-15708-2. Levick, Barbara (2014). Faustina I and II: Imperial Women of the Golden Age. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-537941-9. William Smith, ed. (1870). Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology. Writings[edit] Main article: Meditations While on campaign between 170 and 180, Marcus wrote his Meditations in Greek as a source for his own guidance and self-improvement. The original title of this work, if it had one, is unknown. 'Meditations' – as well as other titles including 'To Himself' – were adopted later. He had a logical mind and his notes were representative of Stoic philosophy and spirituality. Meditations is still revered as a literary monument to a government of service and duty. According to Hays, the book was a favourite of Christina of Sweden, Frederick the Great, John Stuart Mill, Matthew Arnold, and Goethe, and is admired by modern figures such as Wen Jiabao and Bill Clinton.[313] It has been considered by many commentators to be one of the greatest works of philosophy.[314] It is not known how widely Marcus's writings were circulated after his death. There are stray references in the ancient literature to the popularity of his precepts, and Julian the Apostate was well aware of his reputation as a philosopher, though he does not specifically mention Meditations.[315] It survived in the scholarly traditions of the Eastern Church and the first surviving quotes of the book, as well as the first known reference of it by name ('Marcus's writings to himself') are from Arethas of Caesarea in the 10th century and in the Byzantine Suda (perhaps inserted by Arethas himself). It was first published in 1558 in Zurich by Wilhelm Xylander (ne Holzmann), from a manuscript reportedly lost shortly afterwards.[316] The oldest surviving complete manuscript copy is in the Vatican library and dates to the 14th century.[317] Equestrian Statue of Marcus Aurelius[edit] Main article: Equestrian Statue of Marcus Aurelius Aureus of Marcus Aurelius (AD December 173 – June 174), with his equestrian statue on the reverse. inscription: M. ANTONINVS AVG. TR. P. XXVIII / IMP. VI, CO[N]S III.[318] Detailed view of the Column of Marcus Aurelius The Equestrian Statue of Marcus Aurelius in Rome is the only Roman equestrian statue which has survived into the modern period.[319] This may be due to it being wrongly identified during the Middle Ages as a depiction of the Christian emperor Constantine the Great, and spared the destruction which statues of pagan figures suffered. Crafted of bronze in circa 175, it stands 11.6 ft (3.5 m) and is now located in the Capitoline Museums of Rome. The emperor's hand is outstretched in an act of clemency offered to a bested enemy, while his weary facial expression due to the stress of leading Rome into nearly constant battles perhaps represents a break with the classical tradition of sculpture.[320] A close up view of the Equestrian statue of Marcus Aurelius in the Capitoline Museums A full view of the equestrian statue Replica of the statue, Capitoline Hill Replica of the statue, Capitoline Hill Column of Marcus Aurelius[edit] Main article: Column of Marcus Aurelius Marcus's victory column, established in Rome either in his last few years of life or after his reign and completed in 193, was built to commemorate his victory over the Sarmatians and Germanic tribes in 176. A spiral of carved reliefs wraps around the column, showing scenes from his military campaigns. A statue of Marcus had stood atop the column but disappeared during the Middle Ages. It was replaced with a statue of Saint Paul in 1589 by Pope Sixtus V.[321] The column of Marcus and the column of Trajan are often compared by scholars given how they are both Doric in style, had a pedestal at the base, had sculpted friezes depicting their respective military victories, and a statue on top.[322] The Column of Marcus Aurelius in Piazza Colonna. The five horizontal slits allow light into the internal spiral staircase. The column, right, in the background of Panini's painting of the Palazzo Montecitorio, with the base of the Column of Antoninus Pius in the right foreground (1747) In popular culture[edit] In the 1965 epic drama The Fall of The Roman Empire, Alec Guinness portrays Marcus Aurelius. The film is noteworthy for using quotes from 'Meditations'. In the 2000 British-American drama Gladiator, Richard Harris portrays Marcus Aurelius in a fictionalized version. In the 2017 docu-drama miniseries Roman Empire, John Bach portrays Marcus Aurelius. Notes[edit] ^ Dio asserts that the Annii were near-kin of Hadrian, and that it was to these familial ties that they owed their rise to power.[25] The precise nature of these kinship ties is nowhere stated, but is believed that Rupilia Faustina was the daughter of the consular senator Libo Rupilius Frugi and Matidia, who was also the mother (presumably through another marriage) of Vibia Sabina, Hadrian's wife.[26] ^ Farquharson dates his death to 130 when Marcus was nine.[34] ^ Birley amends the text of the HA Marcus from 'Eutychius' to 'Tuticius'.[46] ^ Commodus was a known consumptive at the time of his adoption, so Hadrian may have intended Marcus's eventual succession anyway.[55] ^ The manuscript is corrupt here.[78] ^ Modern scholars have not offered as positive an assessment. His second modern editor, Niebhur, thought him stupid and frivolous; his third editor, Naber, found him contemptible.[95] Historians have seen him as a 'pedant and a bore', his letters offering neither the running political analysis of a Cicero or the conscientious reportage of a Pliny.[96] Recent prosopographic research has rehabilitated his reputation, though not by much.[97] ^ Champlin notes that Marcus's praise of Rusticus in the Meditations is out of order (he is praised immediately after Diognetus, who had introduced Marcus to philosophy), giving him special emphasis.[117] ^ Although part of the biographer's account of Lucius is fictionalized (probably to mimic Nero, whose birthday Lucius shared[137]) and another part poorly compiled from a better biographical source,[138] scholars have accepted these biographical details as accurate.[139] ^ These name-swaps have proven so confusing that even the Historia Augusta, our main source for the period, cannot keep them straight.[154] The 4th-century ecclesiastical historian Eusebius of Caesarea shows even more confusion.[155] The mistaken belief that Lucius had the name 'Verus' before becoming emperor has proven especially popular.[156] ^ There was, however, much precedent. The consulate was a twin magistracy, and earlier emperors had often had a subordinate lieutenant with many imperial offices (under Antoninus, the lieutenant had been Marcus). Many emperors had planned a joint succession in the past: Augustus planned to leave Gaius and Lucius Caesar as joint emperors on his death; Tiberius wished to have Gaius Caligula and Tiberius Gemellus do so as well; Claudius left the empire to Nero and Britannicus, imagining that they would accept equal rank. All of these arrangements had ended in failure, either through premature death (Gaius and Lucius Caesar) or judicial murder (Gemellus by Caligula and Britannicus by Nero).[156] ^ The biographer relates the scurrilous (and, in the judgment of Anthony Birley, untrue) rumor that Commodus was an illegitimate child born of a union between Faustina and a gladiator.[168] ^ Because both Lucius and Marcus are said to have taken active part in the recovery (HA Marcus viii. 4–5), the flood must have happened before Lucius's departure for the east in 162; because it appears in the biographer's narrative after Antoninus's funeral has finished and the emperors have settled into their offices, it must not have occurred in the spring of 161. A date in autumn 161 or spring 162 is probable, and, given the normal seasonal distribution of Tiber flooding, the most probable date is in spring 162.[184] (Birley dates the flood to autumn 161.[179]) ^ Since 15 AD, the river had been administered by a Tiber Conservancy Board, with a consular senator at its head and a permanent staff. In 161, the curator alevi Tiberis et riparum et cloacarum urbis ('Curator of the Tiber Bed and Banks and the City Sewers') was A. Platorius Nepos, son or grandson of the builder of Hadrian's Wall, whose name he shares. He probably had not been particularly incompetent. A more likely candidate for that incompetence is Nepos's likely predecessor, M. Statius Priscus. A military man and consul for 159, Priscus probably looked on the office as little more than 'paid leave'.[186] ^ Alan Cameron adduces the 5th-century writer Sidonius Apollinaris's comment that Marcus commanded 'countless legions' vivente Pio (while Antoninus was alive) while contesting Birley's contention that Marcus had no military experience. (Neither Apollinaris nor the Historia Augusta (Birley's source) are particularly reliable on 2nd-century history.[201]) ^ Birley believes there is some truth in these considerations.[223] ^ The whole section of the vita dealing with Lucius's debaucheries (HA Verus iv. 4–6.6), however, is an insertion into a narrative otherwise entirely cribbed from an earlier source. Most of the details are fabricated by the biographer himself, relying on nothing better than his own imagination.[229] ^ For further information on Óc Eo, see Osborne, Milton. The Mekong: Turbulent Past, Uncertain Future. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin, 2006, revised edition, first published in 2000. pp. 24–25. ISBN 978-1741148930. Citations[edit] All citations to the Historia Augusta are to individual biographies, and are marked with a 'HA'. Citations to the works of Fronto are cross-referenced to C.R. Haines's Loeb edition. ^ 'Marcus Aurelius' Archived 28 December 2018 at the Wayback Machine. Dictionary.com. ^ Rohrbacher, p. 5. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, pp. 229–30. The thesis of single authorship was first proposed in H. Dessau's 'Über Zeit und Persönlichkeit der Scriptoes Historiae Augustae' (in German), Hermes 24 (1889), pp. 337ff. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 230. On the HA Verus, see Barnes, 'Hadrian and Lucius Verus', pp. 65–74. ^ Beard, Mary. 'Was He Quite Ordinary?'. London Review of Books 31:14, 23 July 2009; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 226. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 227. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, pp. 228–229, 253. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, pp. 227–28. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 228. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 49. ^ Magill, p. 693. ^ a b Historia MA I.9–10 ^ Van Ackeren, p. 139. ^ a b c Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 33. ^ Dio 69.21.1; HA Marcus i. 10; McLynn, Marcus Aurelius: Warrior, Philosopher, Emperor, p. 24. ^ Dio lxix.21.1; HA Marcus i. 9; McLynn, Marcus Aurelius: Warrior, Philosopher, Emperor, p. 24. ^ Van Ackeren, p. 78. ^ Dean, p. 32. ^ Knight, Charles (1856). The English Cyclopædia: A New Dictionary of Universal Knowledge. Biography. Bradbury & Evans. p. 439. Marcus Aurelius Malennius and Numa. ^ Sánchez, p. 165. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 29; McLynn, Marcus Aurelius: Warrior, Philosopher, Emperor, p. 14. ^ HA Marcus i. 2, 4; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 28; McLynn, Marcus Aurelius: A Life, p. 14. ^ Giacosa, p. 8. ^ Levick, pp. 161, 163. ^ Dio 69.21.2, 71.35.2–3; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 31. ^ Codex Inscriptionum Latinarum 14.3579 "Epigraphik-Datenbank Clauss/Slaby". Archived from the original on 29 April 2012. Retrieved 15 November 2011. ; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 29; McLynn, Marcus Aurelius: Warrior, Philosopher, Emperor, pp. 14, 575 n. 53, citing Ronald Syme, Roman Papers 1.244. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 29, citing Pliny, Epistulae 8.18. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 30. ^ "M. Cornelius Fronto: Epistulae". ^ l. Richardson, jr; Richardson, Professor of Latin (Emeritus) L. (October 1992). A New Topographical Dictionary of Ancient Rome. JHU Press. p. 198. ISBN 9780801843006. horti domizia lucilla. ^ Ad Marcum Caesarem ii. 8.2 (= Haines 1.142), qtd. and tr. Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 31. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, pp. 31, 44. ^ a b Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 31. ^ Farquharson, 1.95–96. ^ Meditations 1.1, qtd. and tr. Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 31. ^ HA Marcus ii. 1 and Meditations v. 4, qtd. in Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 32. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, pp. 31–32. ^ Meditations i. 1, qtd. and tr. Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 35. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 35. ^ Meditations i. 17.2; Farquharson, 1.102; McLynn, Marcus Aurelius: Warrior, Philosopher, Emperor, p. 23; cf. Meditations i. 17.11; Farquharson, 1.103. ^ McLynn, Marcus Aurelius: Warrior, Philosopher, Emperor, 20–21. ^ Meditations 1.4; McLynn, Marcus Aurelius: Warrior, Philosopher, Emperor, p. 20. ^ HA Marcus ii. 2, iv. 9; Meditations i. 3; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 37; McLynn, Marcus Aurelius: Warrior, Philosopher, Emperor, pp. 21–22. ^ HA Marcus ii. 6; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 38; McLynn, Marcus Aurelius: Warrior, Philosopher, Emperor, p. 21. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 40, citing Aristides, Oratio 32 K; McLynn, Marcus Aurelius: Warrior, Philosopher, Emperor, p. 21. ^ Magie & Birley, Lives of the later Caesars, pp. 109, 109 n.8; Marcus Aurelius, pp. 40, 270 n.27, citing Bonner Historia-Augusta Colloquia 1966/7, pp. 39ff. ^ HA Marcus ii. 3; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, pp. 40, 270 n.27. ^ Meditations i. 10; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 40; McLynn, Marcus Aurelius: Warrior, Philosopher, Emperor, p. 22. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, pp. 40, 270 n.28, citing A.S.L. Farquharson, The Meditations of Marcus Antoninus (Oxford, 1944) ii. 453. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, pp. 41–42. ^ HA Hadrian xiii. 10, qtd. in Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 42. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 42. Van Ackeren, 142. On the succession to Hadrian, see also: T.D. Barnes, 'Hadrian and Lucius Verus', Journal of Roman Studies 57:1–2 (1967): 65–79; J. VanderLeest, 'Hadrian, Lucius Verus, and the Arco di Portogallo', Phoenix 49:4 (1995): pp. 319–30. ^ HA Aelius vi. 2–3 ^ HA Hadrian xxiii. 15–16; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 45; 'Hadrian to the Antonines', 148. ^ Dio, lxix.17.1; HA Aelius, iii. 7, iv. 6, vi. 1–7; Birley, 'Hadrian to the Antonines', p. 147. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 46. Date: Birley, 'Hadrian to the Antonines', p. 148. ^ Weigel, Richard D. 'Antoninus Pius (A.D. 138–161)'. Roman Emperors. ^ Dio 69.21.1; HA Hadrian xxiv. 1; HA Aelius vi. 9; HA Antoninus Pius iv. 6–7; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, pp. 48–49. ^ HA Marcus v. 3; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 49. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, pp. 49–50. ^ HA Marcus v. 6–8, qtd. and tr. Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 50. ^ Dio 69.22.4; HA Hadrian xxv. 5–6; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, pp. 50–51. Hadrian's suicide attempts: Dio, lxix. 22.1–4; HA Hadrian xxiv. 8–13. ^ HA Hadrian xxv. 7; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 53. ^ HA Antoninus Pius v. 3, vi. 3; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, pp. 55–56; 'Hadrian to the Antonines', p. 151. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 55; 'Hadrian to the Antonines', p. 151. ^ Mattingly & Sydenham, Roman imperial coinage, vol. III, p. 108. ^ Mattingly & Sydenham, Roman imperial coinage, vol. III, p. 77. ^ HA Marcus vi. 2; Verus ii. 3–4; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, pp. 53–54. ^ Dio 71.35.5; HA Marcus vi. 3; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 56. ^ Meditations vi. 30, qtd. and tr. Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 57; cf. Marcus Aurelius, p. 270 n.9, with notes on the translation. ^ a b HA Marcus vi. 3; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, 57. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, pp. 57, 272 n.10, citing Codex Inscriptionum Latinarum 6.32, 6.379, cf. Inscriptiones Latinae Selectae 360. ^ Meditations 5.16, qtd. and tr. Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 57. ^ Meditations 8.9, qtd. and tr. Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 57. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, pp. 57–58. ^ Ad Marcum Caesarem iv. 7, qtd. and tr. Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 90. ^ HA Marcus vi. 5; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 58. ^ a b Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 89. ^ Ad Marcum Caesarem v. 1, qtd. and tr. Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 89. ^ Ad Marcum Caesarem 4.8, qtd. and tr. Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 89. ^ Dio 71.36.3; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 89. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, pp. 90–91. ^ HA Antoninus Pius x. 2, qtd. and tr. Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 91. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 91. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 61. ^ HA Marcus iii. 6; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 62. ^ HA Marcus ii. 4; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 62. ^ Alan Cameron, review of Anthony Birley's Marcus Aurelius, Classical Review 17:3 (1967): p. 347. ^ Vita Sophistae 2.1.14; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, pp. 63–64. ^ Aulus Gellius, Noctes Atticae 9.2.1–7; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, pp. 64–65. ^ Aulus Gellius, Noctes Atticae 19.12, qtd. and tr. Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 65. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 65. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, pp. 67–68, citing Champlin, Fronto and Antonine Rome, esp. chs. 3 and 4. ^ a b Birley, Marcus Aurelius, pp. 65–67. ^ Champlin, Fronto, pp. 1–2. ^ Mellor, p. 460. ^ Cf., e.g.: Mellor, p. 461 and passim. ^ a b Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 69. ^ Ad Marcum Caesarem iv. 6 (= Haines 1.80ff), qtd. and tr. Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 76. ^ Ad Marcum Caesarem iv. 6 (= Haines 1.80ff); Birley, Marcus Aurelius, pp. 76–77. ^ Ad Marcum Caesarem iii. 10–11 (= Haines 1.50ff), qtd. and tr. Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 73. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 73. ^ Champlin, 'Chronology of Fronto', p. 138. ^ Ad Marcum Caesarem v. 74 ( =Haines 2.52ff), qtd. and tr. Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 73. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 77. On the date, see Champlin, 'Chronology of Fronto', p. 142, who (with Bowersock, Greek Sophists in the Roman Empire (1964), 93ff) argues for a date in the 150s; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, pp. 78–79, 273 n.17 (with Ameling, Herodes Atticus (1983), 1.61ff, 2.30ff) argues for 140. ^ Ad Marcum Caesarem iii. 2 (= Haines 1.58ff), qtd. and tr. Birley, Marcus Aurelius, pp. 77–78. ^ Ad Marcum Caesarem iii. 3 (= Haines 1.62ff); Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 78. ^ Ad Marcum Caesarem iii. 3 (= Haines 1.62ff), qtd. and tr. Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 79. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 80. ^ Ad Marcum Caesarem iv. 13 (= Haines 1.214ff), qtd. and tr. Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 93. ^ Ad Marcum Caesarem iv. 3.1 (= Haines 1.2ff); Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 94. ^ HA Marcus iii. 5–8, qtd. and tr. Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 94. ^ Ad Marcum Caesarem iv. 3, qtd. and tr. Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 69. ^ De Eloquentia iv. 5 (= Haines 2.74), qtd. and tr. Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 95. Alan Cameron, in his review of Birley's biography (The Classical Review 17:3 (1967): p. 347), suggests a reference to chapter 11 of Arthur Darby Nock's Conversion (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1933, rept. 1961): 'Conversion to Philosophy'. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, pp. 94, 105. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 95; Champlin, Fronto, p. 120. ^ Champlin, Fronto, p. 174 n. 12. ^ Ad Antoninum Imperator i.2.2 (= Haines 2.36), qtd. and tr. Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 95. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, pp. 94–95, 101. ^ Champlin, Fronto, p. 120. ^ Meditations i.7, qtd. and tr. Birley, Marcus Aurelius, pp. 94–95. ^ Philostratus, Vitae sophistorum ii. 9 (557); cf. Suda, Markos ^ a b c d Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 103. ^ Ad Marcum Caesarem 4.11 (= Haines 1.202ff), qtd. and tr. Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 105. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 247 F.1. ^ a b c Birley, Marcus Aurelius, pp. 206–207. ^ Meditations ix.40, qtd. and tr. Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 207. ^ a b Meditations x.34, tr. Farquharson, pp. 78, 224. ^ a b Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 107. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, pp. 107–08. ^ a b c Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 108. ^ Inscriptiones Graecae ad Res Romanas pertinentes 4.1399, qtd. and tr. Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 114. ^ a b c d e Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 114. ^ Reed, p. 194. ^ a b c d e f g h Lendering, Jona. 'Marcus Aurelius'. Livius.org. ^ HA Verus 2.9–11; 3.4–7; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 108. ^ Suetonius, Nero 6.1; HA Verus 1.8; Barnes, 'Hadrian and Lucius Verus', 67; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 158. See also: Barnes, 'Hadrian and Lucius Verus', pp. 69–70; Pierre Lambrechts, 'L'empereur Lucius Verus. Essai de réhabilitation' (in French), Antiquité Classique 3 (1934), pp. 173ff. ^ Barnes, 'Hadrian and Lucius Verus', p. 66. Poorly compiled: e.g. Barnes, 'Hadrian and Lucius Verus', p. 68. ^ Barnes, 'Hadrian and Lucius Verus', pp. 68–69. ^ HA Verus 2.9–11; 3.4–7; Barnes, 'Hadrian and Lucius Verus', 68; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 108. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 112. ^ Bowman, 156; Victor, 15:7 ^ Victor, 15:7 ^ Dio 71.33.4–5; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 114. ^ Bury, p. 532. ^ HA Antoninus Pius 12.4–8; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 114. ^ Bowman, p. 156. ^ HA Marcus vii. 5, qtd. and tr. Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 116. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 116. Birley takes the phrase horror imperii from HA Pert. xiii. 1 and xv. 8. ^ Birley, 'Hadrian to the Antonines', p. 156. ^ HA Verus iii.8; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 116; 'Hadrian to the Antonines', p. 156. ^ HA Verus iv.1; Marcus vii.5; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 116. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, pp. 116–17. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 117; 'Hadrian to the Antonines', p. 157 n.53. ^ Birley, 'Hadrian to the Antonines', p. 157 n.53. ^ a b c d Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 117. ^ HA Verus iv.2, tr. Magie, cited in Birley, Marcus Aurelius, pp. 117, 278 n.4. ^ HA Marcus vii. 9; Verus iv.3; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, pp. 117–18. ^ HA Marcus vii. 9; Verus iv.3; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, pp. 117–18. 'twice the size': Duncan-Jones, p. 109. ^ a b Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 118. ^ a b 'Roman Currency of the Principate'. Tulane.edu. Archived 10 February 2001. ^ HA Marcus vii. 10, tr. Magie, cited in Birley, Marcus Aurelius, pp. 118, 278 n.6. ^ HA Marcus vii. 10–11; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 118. ^ HA Antoninus Pius xii.8; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, pp. 118–19. ^ HA Marcus vii. 4; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 119. ^ HA Comm. i.3; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 119. ^ HA Comm. i.2; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 119. ^ HA Marcus xix. 1–2; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 278 n.9. ^ HA Commodus. i.4, x.2; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 119. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 119, citing H. Mattingly, Coins of the Roman Empire in the British Museum IV: Antoninus Pius to Commodus (London, 1940), Marcus Aurelius and Lucius Verus, nos. 155ff.; 949ff. ^ HA Marcus vii. 7; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 118. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 118, citing Werner Eck, Die Organization Italiens (1979), pp. 146ff. ^ HA Marcus viii. 1, qtd. and tr. Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 119; 'Hadrian to the Antonines', p. 157. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, pp. 122–23, citing H.G. Pfalum, Les carrières procuratoriennes équestres sous le Haut-Empire romain I–III (Paris, 1960–61); Supplément (Paris, 1982), nos. 142; 156; Eric Birley, Roman Britain and the Roman Army (1953), pp. 142ff., 151ff. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 123, citing H.G. Pfalum, Les carrières procuratoriennes équestres sous le Haut-Empire romain I–III (Paris, 1960–61); Supplément (Paris, 1982), no. 141. ^ HA Marcus viii. 8; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 123, citing W. Eck, Die Satthalter der germ. Provinzen (1985), pp. 65ff. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 120, citing Ad Verum Imperator i.3.2 (= Haines 1.298ff). ^ Ad Antoninum Imperator iv.2.3 (= Haines 1.302ff), qtd. and tr. Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 119. ^ a b Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 120. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 120, citing Ad Verum Imperator i.1 (= Haines 1.305). ^ Ad Antoninum Imperator iv.1 (= Haines 1.300ff), qtd. and tr. Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 120. ^ HA Marcus viii. 3–4; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 120. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 120, citing H. Mattingly, Coins of the Roman Empire in the British Museum IV: Antoninus Pius to Commodus (London, 1940), Marcus Aurelius and Lucius Verus, nos. 841; 845. ^ Gregory S. Aldrete, Floods of the Tiber in ancient Rome (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007), pp. 30–31. ^ HA Marcus viii. 4–5; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 120. ^ Inscriptiones Latinae Selectae 5932 (Nepos), 1092 (Priscus); Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 121. ^ HA Marcus xi. 3, cited in Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 278 n.16. ^ Ad Antoninum Imperator 1.2.2 (= Haines 2.35), qtd. and tr. Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 128. ^ De eloquentia 1.12 (= Haines 2.63–65), qtd. and tr. Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 128. ^ Ad Antoninum Imperator 1.2.2 (= Haines 2.35); Birley, Marcus Aurelius, pp. 127–28. ^ Ad Antoninum Imperator 1.2.4 (= Haines 2.41–43), tr. Haines; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 128. ^ HA Antoninus Pius xii.7; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, pp. 114, 121. ^ Event: HA Marcus viii. 6; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 121. Date: Jaap-Jan Flinterman, 'The Date of Lucian's Visit to Abonuteichos,' Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 119 (1997): p. 281. ^ HA Marcus viii. 6; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 121. ^ Lucian, Alexander 27; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 121. ^ Lucian, Alexander 27; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, pp. 121–22. On Alexander, see: Robin Lane Fox, Pagans and Christians (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1986), pp. 241–50. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 278 n.19. ^ Dio 71.2.1; Lucian, Historia Quomodo Conscribenda 21, 24, 25; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, pp. 121–22. ^ HA Marcus viii. 7; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 122. ^ HA Antoninus Pius vii.11; Marcus vii.2; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, pp. 103–04, 122. ^ Pan. Ath. 203–04, qtd. and tr. Alan Cameron, review of Anthony Birley's Marcus Aurelius, The Classical Review 17:3 (1967): p. 349. ^ HA Marcus viii. 6; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 123. ^ Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum 8.7050–51; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 123. ^ Incriptiones Latinae Selectae 1097–98; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 123. ^ Incriptiones Latinae Selectae 1091; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 123. ^ Incriptiones Latinae Selectae 2311; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 123. ^ HA Marcus xii. 13; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 123. ^ L'Année Épigraphique 1972.657 "Epigraphik-Datenbank Clauss/Slaby". Archived from the original on 29 April 2012. Retrieved 15 November 2011. ; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 125. ^ HA Verus 9.2; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 125. ^ Mattingly & Sydenham, Roman imperial coinage, vol. III, p. 226. ^ De Feriis Alsiensibus 1 (= Haines 2.3); Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 126. ^ De Feriis Alsiensibus 3.1 (= Haines 2.5), qtd. and tr. Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 126. ^ De Feriis Alsiensibus 3.4 (= Haines 2.9); Birley, Marcus Aurelius, pp. 126–27. ^ De Feriis Alsiensibus 3.6–12 (= Haines 2.11–19); Birley, Marcus Aurelius, pp. 126–27. ^ De Feriis Alsiensibus 4, tr. Haines 2.19; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 127. ^ De Feriis Alsiensibus 4 (= Haines 2.19), qtd. and tr. Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 127. ^ Ad Verum Imperator 2.1.19 (= Haines 2.149); Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 129. ^ De bello Parthico x. (= Haines 2.31), qtd. and tr. Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 127. ^ De bello Parthico i–ii. (= Haines 2.21–23). ^ De bello Parthico i. (= Haines 2.21), qtd. and tr. Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 127. ^ Dio, lxxi. 1.3; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 123. ^ HA Verus v. 8; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, pp. 123, 125. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 125. ^ HA Marcus viii. 9, tr. Magie; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, pp. 123–26. On Lucius's voyage, see: HA Verus vi. 7–9; HA Marcus viii. 10–11; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, pp. 125–26. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 129. ^ HA Verus iv.4; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 129. ^ HA Verus iv. 6, tr. Magie; cf. v. 7; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 129. ^ HA Verus viii. 7, viii. 10–11; Fronto, Principae Historia 17 (= Haines 2.217); Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 129. ^ Barnes, 'Hadrian and Lucius Verus.', p. 69. ^ HA Verus ix. 2; Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum 3.199 "Epigraphik-Datenbank Clauss/Slaby". Archived from the original on 29 April 2012. Retrieved 15 November 2011. ; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, pp. 130–31. ^ HA Verus vii. 7; Marcus ix. 4; Barnes, 'Hadrian and Lucius Verus', p. 72; Birley, 'Hadrian to the Antonines', p. 163; cf. also Barnes, 'Legislation against the Christians', p. 39; 'Some Persons in the Historia Augusta', p. 142, citing the Vita Abercii 44ff. ^ HA Verus 7.10; Lucian, Imagines 3; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 131. Cf. Lucian, Imagines, Pro Imaginibus, passim. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 131; 'Hadrian to the Antonines', p. 163. ^ HA Verus vii. 7; Marcus ix. 4; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 131. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, 131, citing Année Épigraphique 1958.15. ^ HA Verus 7.7; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 131. ^ HA Marcus ix. 4; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 131. ^ HA Marcus ix. 5–6; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 131. ^ HA Marcus ix. 1; Birley, 'Hadrian to the Antonines', p. 162. ^ HA Marcus ix. 1; HA Verus vii. 1–2; Ad Verrum Imperator 2.3 (= Haines 2.133); Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 129; 'Hadrian to the Antonines', p. 162. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 129; 'Hadrian to the Antonines', p. 162, citing H. Mattingly, Coins of the Roman Empire in the British Museum IV: Antoninus Pius to Commodus (London, 1940), Marcus Aurelius and Lucius Verus, nos. 233ff. ^ Dio, lxxi.3.1; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, 131; 'Hadrian to the Antonines', p. 162; Millar, Near East, p. 113. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 280 n. 42; 'Hadrian to the Antonines', p. 162. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 131; 'Hadrian to the Antonines', p. 162, citing H. Mattingly, Coins of the Roman Empire in the British Museum IV: Antoninus Pius to Commodus (London, 1940), Marcus Aurelius and Lucius Verus, nos. 261ff.; 300 ff. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, pp. 130, 279 n. 38; 'Hadrian to the Antonines', p. 163, citing Prosopographia Imperii Romani2 M 169; Millar, Near East, p. 112. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 130; 'Hadrian to the Antonines', p. 162. ^ Fronto, Ad Verum Imperator ii.1.3 (= Haines 2.133); Astarita, 41; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 130; 'Hadrian to the Antonines', p. 162. ^ Inscriptiones Latinae Selectae 1098; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 130. ^ Birley, 'Hadrian to the Antonines', p. 163, citing Prosopographia Imperii Romani2 M 169. ^ Lucian, Historia Quomodo Conscribenda 15, 19; Birley, 'Hadrian to the Antonines', p. 163. ^ Lucian, Historia Quomodo Conscribenda 20, 28; Birley, 'Hadrian to the Antonines', p. 163, citing Syme, Roman Papers, 5.689ff. ^ HA Verus 8.3–4; Birley, 'Hadrian to the Antonines', 163. Birley cites R.H. McDowell, Coins from Seleucia on the Tigris (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1935), pp. 124ff., on the date. ^ Birley, 'Hadrian to the Antonines', p. 164. ^ Birley, 'Hadrian to the Antonines', p. 164, citing H. Mattingly, Coins of the Roman Empire in the British Museum IV: Antoninus Pius to Commodus (London, 1940), Marcus Aurelius and Lucius Verus, nos. 384 ff., 1248 ff., 1271 ff. ^ Birley, 'Hadrian to the Antonines', p. 164, citing P. Kneissl, Die Siegestitulatur der römischen Kaiser. Untersuchungen zu den Siegerbeinamen des 1. und 2. Jahrhunderts (Göttingen, 1969), pp. 99 ff. ^ Birley, 'Hadrian to the Antonines', p. 164, citing H. Mattingly, Coins of the Roman Empire in the British Museum IV: Antoninus Pius to Commodus (London, 1940), Marcus Aurelius and Lucius Verus, nos. 401ff. ^ a b Adams, p. 94. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 253. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 183. ^ Gnecchi, Medaglioni Romani, p. 33. ^ Mattingly & Sydenham, Roman imperial coinage, vol. III, p. 241. ^ Dio 72.11.3–4; Ad amicos 1.12 (= Haines 2.173); Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 132. ^ Dio, lxxii. 11.3–4; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 132, citing De nepote amisso ii (= Haines 2.222); Ad Verum Imperator ii. 9–10 (= Haines 2.232ff.). ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 133, citing Geza Alföldy, Konsulat und Senatorenstand (1977), Moesia Inferior: pp. 232ff.; Moesia Superior: pp. 234ff.; Pannonia Superior: pp. 236ff.; Dacia: pp. 245ff.; Pannonia Inferior: p. 251. ^ McLynn, Marcus Aurelius: A Life, pp. 323–24. ^ Le Bohec, p. 56. ^ Grant, The Antonines: The Roman Empire in Transition, p. 29. ^ Dio, lxxii.11.4–5; Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 253. ^ Fergus Millar, The Emperor in the Roman World, 31 BC – AD 337 (London: Duckworth, 1977), 6 and passim. See also: idem. 'Emperors at Work', Journal of Roman Studies 57:1/2 (1967): 9–19. ^ 'Thinkers At War – Marcus Aurelius'. Military History Monthly, published 2014. (This is the conclusion of Iain King's biography of Marcus Aurelius.) 'Pius, one of longest-serving emperors, became infirm in his last years, so Marcus Aurelius gradually assumed the imperial duties. By the time he succeeded in AD 161, he was already well-practised in public administration.' ^ Codex Justinianeus 7.2.6, qtd. and tr. Birley, Marcus Aurelius, 133. ^ Digest 31.67.10, qtd. and tr. Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 133. ^ Birley, Marcus Aurelius, p. 133. ^ Irvine, pp. 57–58. ^ Dio, lxxii.33 ^ Pulleyblank, Leslie and Gardiner, pp. 71–79. ^ Yü, pp. 460–61. ^ De Crespigny, p. 600. ^ An, 83. ^ Young, pp. 29–30. ^ Ball, p. 154. ^ Haas, pp. 1093–1098. ^ Murphy, Verity. 'Past pandemics that ravaged Europe'. BBC News, 7 November 2005. ^ Haas, pp. 1093–98. ^ De Crespigny, p. 514. ^ McLaughlin, pp. 59–60. ^ Kleiner, p. 230. ^ Merrony, p. 85. ^ a b Birley, 'Hadrian to the Antonines', pp. 186–91. ^ Kemezis, p. 45. ^ a b Tr. Cary, ad loc. ^ Dio lxxii. 36, 72.34 ^ a b Grant, The Climax Of Rome, p. 15. ^ HA Marcus i. 1, xxvii. 7; Dio lxxi. 1.1; James Francis, Subversive Virtue: Asceticism and Authority in the Second-Century Pagan World (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995), 21 n. 1. ^ Mark, Joshua. 'Marcus Aurelius: Plato's Philosopher King'. Ancient History Encyclopedia. 8 May 2018. ^ Francis, p. 21 n.1, citing Justin, 1 Apologia 1; Athenagoras, Leg. 1; Eusebius, Historia Ecclesiastica 4.26.9–11. ^ Eusebius, Historia Ecclesiastica 4.26.9–11, qtd. and tr. Francis, 21 n. 1. ^ Herodian, Ab Excessu Divi Marci i.2.4, tr. Echols. ^ Thinkers at War. ^ Barnes, 'Legislation against the Christians'. ^ McLynn, Marcus Aurelius: A Life, p. 295. ^ The First Apology of Justin Martyr, Chapter LXVIII ^ a b Stephens, p. 31. ^ a b c Lendering, Jona. 'Antoninus and Aelius'. Livius.org. ^ Ackermann, Schroeder, Terry, Lo Upshur and Whitters, p. 39. ^ a b c d McLynn, Marcus Aurelius: A Life, p. 92. ^ a b c d e Levick, p. 171. ^ Lendering, Jona. 'Lucilla'. Livius.org. ^ Gagarin, p. 37. ^ Benario, Herbert W. 'Marcus Aurelius (A.D. 161–180)'. Roman Emperors. ^ Adams, p. 104. ^ Levick, p. 160. ^ Hays, p. xlix. ^ Collins, p. 58. ^ Stertz, p. 434, citing Themistius, Oratio 6.81; HA Cassius 3.5; Victor, De Caesaribus 16.9. ^ Hays, pp. xlviii–xlix. ^ Hadot, p. 22. ^ Mattingly & Sydenham, Roman imperial coinage, vol. III, p. 236. ^ Equestrian Statue of Marcus Aurelius. ^ Kleiner, p. 193. ^ 'Column of Marcus Aurelius: Overall view, of base and column' Archived 22 May 2020 at the Wayback Machine. University of Notre Dame, Hesburgh Library. Accessed 24 November 2018. ^ 'The Columns of Trajan and Marcus Aurelius'. Grinnell College, Classics. Accessed 24 November 2018. Sources[edit] Ancient[edit] Aristides, Aelius. Orationes (in Latin). Trapp, Michael B. Orations. 1: Orationes 1–2. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2017. ISBN 978-0674996465. Victor, Aurelius. De Caesaribus (in Latin). Bird, H.W. De Caesaribus. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 1994. ISBN 978-0853232186. Dio, Cassius. Roman History (in Greek). Cary, Earnest, trans. Roman History. 9 vols. Loeb ed. London: Heinemann, 1914–27. OCLC 500523615. Online at LacusCurtius. Digest (in Latin). Scott, S.P., trans. The Digest or Pandects in The Civil Law. 17 vols. Cincinnati: Central Trust Company, 1932. OCLC 23759480. Online at the Constitution Society. Epiphanius of Salamis. On Weights and Measures (in Latin). Dean, James Elmer, ed. Epiphanius' Treatise on Weights and Measures – The Syriac Version. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1935. OCLC 123314338. Fronto, Marcus Cornelius. The Correspondence of Marcus Cornelius Fronto: With Marcus Aurelius Antoninus, Lucius Verus, Antoninus Pius, and Various Friends (in Latin). Haines, Charles Reginald, trans. The Correspondence of Marcus Cornelius Fronto: With Marcus Aurelius Antoninus, Lucius Verus, Antoninus Pius, and Various Friends. 2 vols. Loeb ed. London: Heinemann, 1920. OCLC 476921438. Online at the Internet Archive: Vol. 1, 2. Gellius, Aulus. Noctes Atticae (Attic Nights). Rolfe, J.C., trans. The Attic nights of Aulus Gellius. 3 vols. Loeb ed. London: Heinemann, 1927–28. OCLC 59229750 (Vol. 1), OCLC 1072405870 (Vol. 2), OCLC 1021363430 (Vol. 3). Vols. 1 and 2 online at LacusCurtius. Herodian. Ab Excessu Divi Marci (History of the Roman Empire from the Death of Marcus Aurelius, in Latin). Echols, Edward C., trans. Herodian of Antioch's History of the Roman empire: From the death of Marcus Aurelius to the accession of Gordian III. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1961. OCLC 463202486. Online at Tertullian and Livius. Lucian. Fowler, F.G.; Fowler, H.W., trans. The works of Lucian of Samosata. Oxford: Clarendon P., 1949. OCLC 503242210. Alexander (in Latin). Translation online at Tertullian. Translations (from Latin) of Historia Quomodo Conscribenda (The Way to Write History), Imagines (A Portrait–Study), and Pro Imaginibus (Defence of the 'Portrait–Study') online at Sacred Texts, based on the Gutenberg e-text. Marcus Aurelius Antoninus. Meditations. Farquharson, A.S.L., trans. Meditations. New York: Knopf, 1946, rept. 1992. OCLC 897495952. Scriptores Historiae Augustae (Authors of the Historia Augusta). Historia Augusta (Augustan History). Magie, David, trans. Historia Augusta. 3 vols. Loeb ed. London: Heinemann, 1921–32. Online at LacusCurtius. Magie, David; Birley, Anthony R. Lives of the later Caesars. London: The Folio Society, 2005. ISBN 0141935995. Themistius. Orationes (in Latin). Penella, Robert J. The private orations of Themistius. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000. ISBN 978-0520218215. Modern[edit] Ackermann, Marsha E.; Schroeder, Michael J.; Terry, Jancie J.; Lo Upshur, Jiu-Hwa; Whitters, Mark F. Encyclopedia of World History, Ackerman-Schroeder-Terry-Hwa Lo, 2008: Encyclopedia of World History. New York: Facts on File, 2008. ISBN 978-0816063864. Adams, Geoff W. Marcus Aurelius in the Historia Augusta and Beyond. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2013. ISBN 978-0739176382. An, Jiayao. 'When Glass Was Treasured in China'. Annette L. Juliano and Judith A. Lerner (eds), Nomads, Traders, and Holy Men Along China's Silk Road, 79–94. Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols Publishers, 2002. ISBN 978-2503521787. Astarita, Maria L. Avidio Cassio (in Italian). Rome: Edizione di Storia e Letteratura, 1983. OCLC 461867183. Ball, Warwick. Rome in the East: The Transformation of an Empire, 2nd edition. London: Routledge, 2016. ISBN 978-0415720786. Barnes, Timothy D. 'Hadrian and Lucius Verus'. Journal of Roman Studies 57:1–2 (1967): 65–79. doi:10.2307/299345. JSTOR 299345. Barnes, Timothy D. 'Legislation against the Christians'. Journal of Roman Studies, Vol. 58 (1968): 32–50. doi:10.2307/299693. JSTOR 299693. Barnes, Timothy D. 'Some Persons in the Historia Augusta', Phoenix 26:2 (1972): 140–82. doi:10.2307/1087714. JSTOR 1087714. Birley, Anthony R. Marcus Aurelius: a biography. London: Routledge, 1966, rev. 1987. ISBN 978-1134695690. Birley, Anthony R. 'Hadrian to the Antonines'. In The Cambridge Ancient History Volume 11, The High Empire, AD 70–192, edited by Alan Bowman, Peter Garnsey, and Dominic Rathbone, 132–94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. ISBN 978-0521263351. Bowman, John L. A Reference Guide to Stoicism. Bloomington, IN: Author House, 2014. ISBN 978-1496900173. Bury, John Bagnell. The Student's Roman Empire: A History of the Roman Empire from Its Foundation to the Death of Marcus Aurelius (27 B.C.–180 A.D.). New York: Harper, 1893. OCLC 1067064647. Champlin, Edward. 'The Chronology of Fronto'. Journal of Roman Studies 64 (1974): 136–59. doi:10.2307/299265. JSTOR 299265. Champlin, Edward. Fronto and Antonine Rome. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980. ISBN 978-0674331778. Collins, Desmond. Background to Archaeology: Britain in its European Setting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Archive, 1973. OCLC 879899744. De Crespigny, Rafe. A Biographical Dictionary of Later Han to the Three Kingdoms (23–220 AD). Boston: Brill, 2007. ISBN 978-9047411840. Duncan-Jones, Richard. Structure and Scale in the Roman Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. ISBN 978-0521892896. 'Equestrian Statue of Marcus Aurelius'. Musei Capitolini. Gagarin, Michael. The Oxford encyclopedia of ancient Greece and Rome. Volume 7, Temples – Zoology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. ISBN 978-0195170726. Giacosa, Giorgio. Women of the Caesars: their lives and portraits on coins. Translated from Italian by R. Ross Holloway. Milan: Edizioni Arte e Moneta, 1977. ISBN 0839001932. Gilliam, J. F. 'The Plague under Marcus Aurelius'. American Journal of Philology 82.3 (1961): 225–51. doi:10.2307/292367. JSTOR 292367. Gnecchi, Francesco. I medaglioni Romani, 3 Vols, Milan, 1912. OCLC 6529816. Grant, Michael. The Antonines: the Roman Empire in transition. London: Routledge, 2016. ISBN 978-1317972105. Grant, Michael. The Climax Of Rome. London: Orion, 2011. ISBN 978-1780222769. Haas, Charles. The Antonine plague (in French). Bulletin de l'Académie Nationale de Médecine. Académie nationale de médecine. 190 (2006): 1093–98. OCLC 958470753. Hadot, Pierre. The inner citadel: the Meditations of Marcus Aurelius. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998. ISBN 978-0674461710. Hays, Gregory. Meditations. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 2003. ISBN 978-1842126752. Irvine, William B. A Guide to the Good Life: The Ancient Art of Stoic Joy. Oxford University Press, 2009. ISBN 978-1522632733. Kemezis, Adam M. Greek Narratives of the Roman Empire under the Severans: Cassius Dio, Philostratus and Herodian. Cambridge University Press, 2014. ISBN 978-1107062726. Kleiner, Fred S. Gardner's art through the ages. Volume II: the western perspective. Mason, OH: Cengage Learning, 2008. ISBN 978-0495573555. Le Bohec, Yann. The Imperial Roman Army. Routledge, 2013. ISBN 978-1135955137. Levick, Barbara M. Faustina I and II: Imperial Women of the Golden Age. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014. ISBN 978-0199702176. Magill, Frank N. Dictionary of World Biography. London: Routledge, 2003. ISBN 978-1579580407. Mattingly, Harold; Sydenham, Edward A. The Roman imperial coinage. Vol. III, Antoninus Pius to Commodus. London: Spink & Son, 1930. OCLC 768929523. Mellor, Ronald, review of Edward Champlin's Fronto and Antonine Rome, American Journal of Philology 103:4 (1982). Merrony, Mark. The Plight of Rome in the Fifth Century AD. London: Routledge, 2017. ISBN 978-1351702782. McLaughlin, Raoul. Rome and the Distant East: Trade Routes to the Ancient Lands of Arabia, India, and China. London & New York: Continuum, 2010. ISBN 978-1847252357. McLynn, Frank. Marcus Aurelius: A Life. New York: Da Capo Press, 2009. ISBN 978-0306819162. McLynn, Frank. Marcus Aurelius: Warrior, Philosopher, Emperor. London: Bodley Head, 2009. ISBN 978-0224072922. Mulroy, Michael. "* Modern Stoicism: A Case for a Philosopher-King", September 26, 2020. Millar, Fergus. The Roman Near East, 31 B.C.–A.D. 337. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993. ISBN 978-0674778863. Pulleyblank, Edwin G.; Leslie, D. D.; Gardiner, K. H. J. 'The Roman Empire as Known to Han China'. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 1999. 119 (1). doi:10.2307/605541. JSTOR 605541. Reed, J. Eugene. The Lives of the Roman Emperors and Their Associates from Julius Cæsar (B.C. 100) to Agustulus (A.D. 476). Philadelphia, PA: Gebbie & Company, 1883. Robertson, D. How to Think Like a Roman Emperor: The Stoic Philosophy of Marcus Aurelius Archived 4 August 2019 at the Wayback Machine. New York: St. Martin's Press, 2019. Rohrbacher, David. The Play of Allusion in the Historia Augusta. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press, 2016. ISBN 978-0299306045. Sánchez, Jorge Pisa. Breve historia de Hispania: La fascinante historia de Hispania, desde Viriato hasta el esplendor con los emperadores Trajano y Adriano. Los protagonistas, la cultura, la religión y el desarrollo económico y social de una de las provincias más ricas del Imperio romano [Brief history of Hispania: the fascinating history of Hispania, from Viriato to the splendor with the Emperors Trajan and Hadrian. The protagonists, culture, religion, and the economic and social development of one of the richest provinces of the Roman Empire]. (in Spanish) Ediciones Nowtilus S.L., 2010. ISBN 978-8497637695. Stephens, William O. Marcus Aurelius: A Guide for the Perplexed. London: Continuum, 2012. ISBN 978-1441125613. Stertz, Stephen A. 'Marcus Aurelius as Ideal Emperor in Late-Antique Greek Thought'. The Classical World 70:7 (1977): 433–39. doi:10.2307/4348712. JSTOR 4348712. Syme, Ronald. 'The Ummidii'. Historia 17:1 (1968): 72–105. JSTOR 4435015. Van Ackeren, Marcel. A Companion to Marcus Aurelius. New York: Malden, MA : Wiley-Blackwell, 2012. ISBN 978-1-405-19285-9. OCLC 784124210. Young, Gary K. Rome's Eastern Trade: International Commerce and Imperial Policy 31 BC – AD 305. London: Routledge, 2003. ISBN 978-1-134-54793-7. Yü, Ying-shih. 'Han Foreign Relations', in Denis Twitchett and Michael Loewe (eds), The Cambridge History of China: Volume 1, The Ch'in and Han Empires, 221 BC–AD 220, 377–462. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986. ISBN 978-0-521-24327-8. Modern Stoicism: A Case for a Philosopher-King External links[edit] Marcus Aureliusat Wikipedia's sister projects Media from Wikimedia Commons Quotations from Wikiquote Texts from Wikisource Resources from Wikiversity Texts on Wikisource: The Thoughts of the Emperor Marcus Aurelius Antoninus "Marcus Aurelius Antoninus". Catholic Encyclopedia. 2. 1907. "Marcus Aurelius Antoninus". Encyclopædia Britannica. 17 (11th ed.). 1911. pp. 693–96. "Aurelius Antoninus, Marcus". The New Student's Reference Work. 1914.  Greek Wikisource has original text related to this article: Μάρκος Αὐρήλιος Works by Marcus Aurelius at Project Gutenberg Works by or about Marcus Aurelius at Internet Archive Works by Marcus Aurelius at LibriVox (public domain audiobooks) Marcus Aurelius at the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy Podcast #14: Mick Mulroy, Philosopher Kings, Ethics, and Wisdom] Marcus Aurelius Antonine dynasty Born: 26 April 121 Died: 17 March 180 Regnal titles Preceded by Antoninus Pius Roman emperor 161–180 With: Lucius Verus (161–169) Commodus (177–180) Succeeded by Commodus Political offices Preceded by M. Ceccius Justinus G. Julius Bassus as suffect consuls Consul of Rome January–April 140 With: Antoninus Pius Succeeded by Q. Antonius Isauricus L. Aurelius Flaccus Preceded by L. Marcius Celer M. Calpurnius Longus D. Velius Fidus as suffect consuls Consul of Rome January–February 145 With: Antoninus Pius Succeeded by L. Plautius Lamia Silvanus L. Poblicola Priscus Preceded by Ti. Oclatius Severus Novius Sabinianus Consul of Rome January 161 With: Lucius Verus Succeeded by M. Annius Libo Q. Camurius Numisius Junior v t e Roman and Byzantine emperors Principate 27 BC – AD 235 Augustus Tiberius Caligula Claudius Nero Galba Otho Vitellius Vespasian Titus Domitian Nerva Trajan Hadrian Antoninus Pius Marcus Aurelius Lucius Verus Commodus Pertinax Didius Julianus (Pescennius Niger) (Clodius Albinus) Septimius Severus Caracalla Geta Macrinus Diadumenian Elagabalus Severus Alexander Crisis 235–284 Maximinus Thrax Gordian I Gordian II Pupienus Balbinus Gordian III Philip the Arab Philip II Decius Herennius Etruscus Hostilian Trebonianus Gallus Volusianus Aemilianus Valerian Gallienus Saloninus Claudius Gothicus Quintillus Aurelian Tacitus Florian Probus Carus Carinus Numerian Gallic Emperors Postumus (Laelianus) Marius Victorinus (Domitianus II) Tetricus I with Tetricus II as caesar Dominate 284–395 Diocletian Maximian Galerius Constantius Chlorus Severus Constantine the Great Maxentius Licinius Maximinus Daia (Valerius Valens) (Martinian) Constantine II Constantius II Constans Magnentius Vetranio Julian Jovian Valentinian I (west) Valens (east) Gratian (west) Valentinian II (west) Theodosius I Magnus Maximus Victor (Eugenius) Western Empire 395–480 Honorius Constantine III with son Constans II Constantius III Joannes Valentinian III Petronius Maximus Avitus Majorian Libius Severus Anthemius Olybrius Glycerius Julius Nepos Romulus Augustulus Eastern/ Byzantine Empire 395–1204 Arcadius Theodosius II Marcian Leo the Thracian Leo II Zeno Basiliscus Marcus Anastasius I Dicorus Justin I Justinian the Great Justin II Tiberius II Constantine Maurice with son Theodosius as co-emperor Phocas Heraclius Constantine III Heraklonas Constans II Constantine IV with brothers Heraclius and Tiberius and then Justinian II as co-emperors Justinian II (first reign) Leontios Tiberius III Justinian II (second reign) with son Tiberius as co-emperor Philippikos Anastasios II Theodosius III Leo III the Isaurian Constantine V Artabasdos Leo IV the Khazar Constantine VI Irene Nikephoros I Staurakios Michael I Rangabe with son Theophylact as co-emperor Leo V the Armenian with Symbatios-Constantine as junior emperor Michael II the Amorian Theophilos Michael III Basil I the Macedonian Leo VI the Wise Alexander Constantine VII Porphyrogennetos Romanos I Lekapenos with sons Christopher, Stephen and Constantine as junior co-emperors Romanos II Nikephoros II Phokas John I Tzimiskes Basil II Constantine VIII Zoë (first reign) and Romanos III Argyros Zoë (first reign) and Michael IV the Paphlagonian Michael V Kalaphates Zoë (second reign) with Theodora Zoë (second reign) and Constantine IX Monomachos Constantine IX Monomachos (sole emperor) Theodora Michael VI Bringas Isaac I Komnenos Constantine X Doukas Romanos IV Diogenes Michael VII Doukas with brothers Andronikos and Konstantios and son Constantine Nikephoros III Botaneiates Alexios I Komnenos John II Komnenos with Alexios Komnenos as co-emperor Manuel I Komnenos Alexios II Komnenos Andronikos I Komnenos with John Komnenos as co-emperor Isaac II Angelos Alexios III Angelos Alexios IV Angelos Nicholas Kanabos (chosen by the Senate) Alexios V Doukas Empire of Nicaea 1204–1261 Constantine Laskaris Theodore I Laskaris John III Doukas Vatatzes Theodore II Laskaris John IV Laskaris Byzantine Empire 1261–1453 Michael VIII Palaiologos Andronikos II Palaiologos with Michael IX Palaiologos as co-emperor Andronikos III Palaiologos John V Palaiologos John VI Kantakouzenos with John V Palaiologos and Matthew Kantakouzenos as co-emperors John V Palaiologos Andronikos IV Palaiologos John VII Palaiologos Andronikos V Palaiologos Manuel II Palaiologos John VIII Palaiologos Constantine XI Palaiologos Italics indicates a junior co-emperor, while underlining indicates a usurper. v t e Stoicism Philosophers Early Zeno of Citium Persaeus Aristo Sphaerus Herillus Cleanthes Chrysippus Zeno of Tarsus Crates of Mallus Diogenes of Babylon Apollodorus Antipater of Tarsus Middle Panaetius Dardanus Mnesarchus Hecato Posidonius Diodotus Geminus Antipater of Tyre Athenodorus Cananites Late Seneca Cornutus Musonius Rufus Euphrates Cleomedes Epictetus Hierocles Junius Rusticus Marcus Aurelius Philosophy Stoicism categories logic passions physics Neostoicism Modern Stoicism Concepts Adiaphora Apatheia Ataraxia Ekpyrosis Eudaimonia Katalepsis Kathekon Logos Oikeiôsis Pneuma Prohairesis Sophos Works Epictetus Discourses Enchiridion Marcus Aurelius Meditations Seneca Letters to Lucilius Essays: Anger Benefits Clemency Constancy Happiness Leisure Providence Shortness of Life Tranquillity Consolations Other Lectures (Musonius Rufus) On Passions (Chrysippus) Republic (Zeno) Related articles Paradoxa Stoicorum Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta Stoic Opposition Authority control BIBSYS: 90564087 BNC: 000166929 BNE: XX932158 BNF: cb11914476c (data) CANTIC: a10491697 CiNii: DA00596148 GND: 118577468 ISNI: 0000 0001 1031 946X LCCN: n80051702 LNB: 000027790 MBA: 517aed2c-8edd-4f31-b649-27cb9125436b NDL: 00431918 NKC: jn19981001808 NLA: 35966523 NLG: 150699 NLI: 000088890 NLK: KAC200403589 NLP: A1180743X NLR: [1] NSK: 000083919 NTA: 06867452X RERO: 02-A000014105 SELIBR: 194415 SNAC: w6c851bs SUDOC: 027008614 Trove: 1166401 ULAN: 500115701 VcBA: 495/54003 VIAF: 102895066 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n80051702 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marcus_Aurelius&oldid=995638734" Categories: Marcus Aurelius 121 births 180 deaths 2nd-century philosophers 2nd-century Roman emperors Aelii Ancient Roman adoptees Annii Augurs of the Roman Empire Aurelii Fulvi Burials at the Castel Sant'Angelo Cultural critics Deified Roman emperors Glycon cult Hellenistic writers History of ideas History of philosophy Imperial Roman consuls Moneyers of ancient Rome Moral philosophers Nerva–Antonine dynasty Philosophers of ethics and morality Philosophers of law Philosophers of mind Philosophers of Roman Italy Philosophy writers Political philosophers Roman philhellenes Roman philosophers Roman-era Stoic philosophers Social critics Social philosophers Stoic philosophers Stoicism Hidden categories: All articles with dead external links Articles with dead external links from October 2016 Webarchive template wayback links Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata Good articles Use British English from September 2018 Use dmy dates from May 2020 Pages using infobox philosopher with embed equal yes Articles with hCards Pages using multiple image with auto scaled images Pages using Sister project links with wikidata mismatch Articles incorporating a citation from the 1913 Catholic Encyclopedia with Wikisource reference Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica with Wikisource reference Wikipedia articles incorporating citation to the NSRW Wikipedia articles incorporating citation to the NSRW with an wstitle parameter Articles with Project Gutenberg links Articles with Internet Archive links Articles with LibriVox links Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNC identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CANTIC identifiers Wikipedia articles with CINII identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with LNB identifiers Wikipedia articles with MusicBrainz identifiers Wikipedia articles with NDL identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLG identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLI identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLP identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLR identifiers Wikipedia articles with NSK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with RERO identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SNAC-ID identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with Trove identifiers Wikipedia articles with ULAN identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers AC with 29 elements Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikiquote Wikisource Languages Afrikaans Ænglisc العربية Aragonés Asturianu Azərbaycanca تۆرکجه Bân-lâm-gú Беларуская Bikol Central Български བོད་ཡིག Bosanski Brezhoneg Català Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Estremeñu Euskara فارسی Føroyskt Français Frysk Gaeilge Gàidhlig Galego 客家語/Hak-kâ-ngî 한국어 Հայերեն हिन्दी Hrvatski Ido Bahasa Indonesia Interlingua Íslenska Italiano עברית ქართული Қазақша Kiswahili Kongo Latina Latviešu Lietuvių Lingua Franca Nova Magyar Македонски Malagasy मराठी مصرى Bahasa Melayu Монгол မြန်မာဘာသာ Nederlands 日本語 Napulitano Norsk bokmål Norsk nynorsk Occitan Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча پنجابی Piemontèis Polski Português Română Русский Scots Shqip Sicilianu Simple English Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Tagalog தமிழ் ไทย Тоҷикӣ Türkçe Українська Tiếng Việt 文言 Winaray 吴语 Yorùbá 粵語 Zazaki 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 22 December 2020, at 02:54 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1280 ---- Bion of Borysthenes - Wikipedia Bion of Borysthenes From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Bion of Borysthenes Bronze head of a philosopher from Antikythera shipwreck, possibly of Bion Born c. 325 BC Olbia Died c. 250 BC Chalcis School Cynicism Influences Xenocrates, Crates of Athens, Crates of Thebes, Theodorus, Theophrastus Influenced Menippus Bion of Borysthenes (Greek: Βίων Βορυσθενίτης, gen.: Βίωνος; c. 325 – c. 250 BC) was a Greek philosopher. After being sold into slavery, and then released, he moved to Athens, where he studied in almost every school of philosophy. It is, however, for his Cynic-style diatribes that he is chiefly remembered. He satirized the foolishness of people, attacked religion, and eulogized philosophy. Contents 1 Life 2 Philosophy 3 Notes 4 References 5 Further reading 6 External links Life[edit] Bion was from the town of Olbia on the north coast of the Black Sea by the mouth of the river Borysthenes (modern-day Dnieper). He lived c. 325-c. 250 BC, but the exact dates of his birth and death are uncertain. Strabo[1] mentions him as a contemporary of Eratosthenes, who was born 275 BC. Diogenes Laërtius has preserved an account in which Bion describes his parentage to Antigonus II Gonatas, King of Macedonia.[2] His father was a freedman and a dealer in salt fish, with which he combined the occupation of smuggling. His mother, Olympia, was a Lacedaemonian prostitute. The whole family were sold as slaves, on account of some offence committed by the father. In consequence of this, Bion fell into the hands of a rhetorician, who made him his heir. Having burnt his patron's library, he went to Athens, and applied himself to philosophy, in the course of which study he embraced the tenets of almost every sect in succession. First he was an Academic studying under Xenocrates[3] and Crates of Athens,[4] then he became a Cynic,[4] (perhaps under Crates of Thebes), afterwards he attached to Theodorus,[5] the Cyrenaic philosopher whose alleged atheism is supposed to have influenced Bion,[6] and finally he became a pupil of Theophrastus the Peripatetic.[5] After the manner of the sophists of the period, Bion travelled through Greece and Macedonia, and was admitted to the literary circle at the court of Antigonus II Gonatas.[7] He subsequently taught philosophy at Rhodes,[8] and died at Chalcis in Euboea.[6] Philosophy[edit] Because of his early association with the Academy, Diogenes Laërtius placed Bion among the Academics, but there is nothing in his life or thought suggesting an affinity with Platonism and modern scholars regard him as a Cynic, albeit an atypical one with strong Hedonistic or Cyrenaic leanings.[9][10] Much of what Laërtius has to say about Bion seems to have been drawn from hostile sources so care has to be taken in using his account to reconstruct Bion's life and thought.[11] Laërtius reveals to us a man of considerable intellectual acuteness, but quite ready to attack everyone and everything. He was essentially a popular writer, and in his Diatribes he satirized the foolishness of people. While eulogizing poverty and philosophy, he attacked the gods, musicians, geometricians, astrologers, and the wealthy, and denied the efficacy of prayer. Laërtius claims Bion was an atheist (which he renounced at the time of his death)[12] but the surviving fragments reveal only a religious skepticism concerning mystery religions, oracles, etc.[11] The quotations of Bion recorded by Teles, and preserved by Stobaeus reveal a man who "treats of ordinary human problems in a common-sense spirit, though for emphasis employing all the devices of contemporary prose style. ... The situations dealt with are those that may confront any person, from the universalia of old age, poverty, exile, slavery, the fear of death, down to the more particular case of a nagging wife."[11] His influence is distinctly traceable in succeeding writers, e.g. in the satires of Menippus. Horace alludes to his satires and caustic wit.[13] Examples of this wit are his sayings: "The miser did not possess wealth, but was possessed by it." "Impiety was the companion of credulity, [and] avarice the metropolis of vice." "Good slaves are really free, and bad freemen really slaves." One saying is preserved by Cicero:[14] "It is useless to tear our hair when we are in grief, since sorrow is not cured by baldness." Another is cited by Plutarch:[15] "Though boys throw stones at frogs in sport, the frogs do not die in sport but in earnest." Notes[edit] ^ Strabo i.2.2 ^ Diogenes Laërtius, iv. 46–47 ^ Diogenes Laërtius, iv. 10 ^ a b Diogenes Laërtius, iv. 51 ^ a b Diogenes Laërtius, iv. 52 ^ a b Diogenes Laërtius, iv. 54 ^ Diogenes Laërtius, iv. 46, 54 ^ Diogenes Laërtius, iv. 49, 53 ^ Eduard Zeller, Outlines of the History of Greek Philosophy, 13th Edition, page 247 ^ Luis E. Navia, (1996), Classical Cynicism: A Critical Study, pages 154–5. Greenwood ^ a b c Donald Dudley, (1937) A History of Cynicism, pages 64–6 ^ Diogenes Laërtius, iv. 54: "In his familiar talk he would often vehemently assail belief in the gods, a taste which he had derived from Theodorus." See also iv. 56. ^ Horace, Epistles, ii. 2.60 ^ Cicero, Tusculan Disputations, iii. 62 , "In quo facetum illud Bionis, perinde stultissimum regem in luctu capillum sibi evellere quasi calvitio maeror levaretur." ^ Plutarch, Moralia, xii. 66 References[edit]  Laërtius, Diogenes (1925). "The Academics: Bion" . Lives of the Eminent Philosophers. 1:4. Translated by Hicks, Robert Drew (Two volume ed.). Loeb Classical Library. Further reading[edit] Wikisource has the text of a 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica article about Bion. Kindstrand, J., (1976) Bion of Borysthenes: A Collection of the Fragments with Introduction and Commentary. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. ISBN 91-554-0486-3 External links[edit] Quotations related to Bion of Borysthenes at Wikiquote v t e Cynic philosophers Greek era Antisthenes Diogenes Diodorus Zoilus Onesicritus Philiscus Crates Hipparchia Metrocles Monimus Cleomenes Bion Sotades Menippus Menedemus Cercidas Teles Meleager Roman era Favonius Demetrius Dio Chrysostom Agathobulus Secundus Demonax Peregrinus Proteus Theagenes Oenomaus Pancrates Crescens Heraclius Horus Asclepiades Sallustius Authority control BIBSYS: 90299125 BNE: XX1063362 GND: 118974246 ISNI: 0000 0000 7506 1319 LCCN: no2010016071 NKC: ola2002153198 NTA: 069873909 SUDOC: 03494110X VIAF: 106932431 WorldCat Identities: lccn-no2010016071 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bion_of_Borysthenes&oldid=929973332" Categories: 4th-century BC births 3rd-century BC deaths 3rd-century BC philosophers Ancient Greek writers Ancient Greeks in Macedon Ancient Greek slaves and freedmen Ancient Pontic Greeks Cynic philosophers Hellenistic-era philosophers in Athens Hidden categories: Use dmy dates from January 2015 Articles with hCards Articles containing Greek-language text Wikipedia articles incorporating the template Lives of the Eminent Philosophers Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikiquote Languages Català Čeština Deutsch Ελληνικά Español Français Galego Italiano עברית Mirandés Nederlands 日本語 Polski Português Русский Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Українська Edit links This page was last edited on 9 December 2019, at 11:57 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1286 ---- Marcus Terentius Varro - Wikipedia Marcus Terentius Varro From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search An imagined portrait of an elderly Varro. Before 1923, artist unknown[citation needed] Marcus Terentius Varro (Latin: [ˈmaːrkʊs t̪ɛˈrɛn̪t̪ijʊs ˈwarːoː]; 116–27 BC) was one of ancient Rome's greatest scholars and a prolific author. He is sometimes called Varro Reatinus [ˈwarːoː reaːˈt̪iːnʊs] to distinguish him from his younger contemporary Varro Atacinus. Contents 1 Biography 2 Calendars 3 Works 3.1 Extant works 3.2 Known lost works 4 References 5 Further reading 6 External links Biography[edit] Varro was born in or near Reate (now Rieti)[1] to a family thought to be of equestrian rank, and always remained close to his roots in the area, owning a large farm in the Reatine plain, reported as near Lago di Ripa Sottile,[2] until his old age. He supported Pompey, reaching the office of praetor, after having been tribune of the people, quaestor and curule aedile.[3] He was one of the commission of twenty that carried out the great agrarian scheme of Caesar for the resettlement of Capua and Campania (59 BC).[3] Statue of Marcus Terentius Varro in Rieti During Caesar's civil war he commanded one of Pompey's armies in the Ilerda campaign.[4] He escaped the penalties of being on the losing side in the civil war through two pardons granted by Julius Caesar, before and after the Battle of Pharsalus.[5] Caesar later appointed him to oversee the public library of Rome in 47 BC, but following Caesar's death Mark Antony proscribed him, resulting in the loss of much of his property, including his library. As the Republic gave way to Empire, Varro gained the favour of Augustus, under whose protection he found the security and quiet to devote himself to study and writing. Varro studied under the Roman philologist Lucius Aelius Stilo, and later at Athens under the Academic philosopher Antiochus of Ascalon. Varro proved to be a highly productive writer and turned out more than 74 Latin works on a variety of topics. Among his many works, two stand out for historians; Nine Books of Disciplines and his compilation of the Varronian chronology. His Nine Books of Disciplines became a model for later encyclopedists, especially Pliny the Elder. The most noteworthy portion of the Nine Books of Disciplines is its use of the liberal arts as organizing principles.[6] Varro decided to focus on identifying nine of these arts: grammar, rhetoric, logic, arithmetic, geometry, astronomy, musical theory, medicine, and architecture. Using Varro's list, subsequent writers defined the seven classical "liberal arts of the medieval schools".[6] In 37 BC,[7] in his old age, he also wrote on agriculture for his wife Fundania, writing a "voluminous" work De re rustica (also called Res rusticae)—similar to Cato the Elder's similar work De agri cultura—on the management of large slave-run estates.[8] Calendars[edit] Fasti Antiates Maiores, an inscription containing the Roman calendar. This calendar predates the Julian reform of the calendar; it contains the months Quintilis and Sextilis, and allows for the insertion of an intercalary month The compilation of the Varronian chronology was an attempt to determine an exact year-by-year timeline of Roman history up to his time. It is based on the traditional sequence of the consuls of the Roman Republic—supplemented, where necessary, by inserting "dictatorial" and "anarchic" years. It has been demonstrated to be somewhat erroneous but has become the widely accepted standard chronology, in large part because it was inscribed on the arch of Augustus in Rome; though that arch no longer stands, a large portion of the chronology has survived under the name of Fasti Capitolini. Works[edit] Varro's literary output was prolific; Ritschl estimated it at 74 works in some 620 books, of which only one work survives complete, although we possess many fragments of the others, mostly in Gellius' Attic Nights. He was called "the most learned of the Romans" by Quintilian,[9] and also recognized by Plutarch as "a man deeply read in Roman history".[10] Varro was recognized as an important source by many other ancient authors, among them Cicero, Pliny the Elder, Virgil in the Georgics, Columella, Aulus Gellius, Macrobius, Augustine, and Vitruvius, who credits him (VII.Intr.14) with a book on architecture. His only complete work extant, Rerum rusticarum libri tres (Three Books on Agriculture), has been described as "the well digested system of an experienced and successful farmer who has seen and practised all that he records."[11] One noteworthy aspect of the work is his anticipation of microbiology and epidemiology. Varro warned his contemporaries to avoid swamps and marshland, since in such areas ...there are bred certain minute creatures which cannot be seen by the eyes, but which float in the air and enter the body through the mouth and nose and cause serious diseases.[12][13][14] Extant works[edit] Plan of the birdhouse at Casinum designed and built by Varro De lingua latina libri XXV (or On the Latin Language in 25 Books, of which six books (V–X) survive, partly mutilated) Rerum rusticarum libri III (or Agricultural Topics in Three Books) Known lost works[edit] Saturarum Menippearum libri CL or Menippean Satires in 150 books Antiquitates rerum humanarum et divinarum libri XLI (Antiquities of Human and Divine Things)[15] Logistoricon libri LXXVI Hebdomades vel de imaginibus Disciplinarum libri IX (An encyclopedia on the liberal arts, of which the first book dealt with grammar) De rebus urbanis libri III (or On Urban Topics in Three Books) De gente populi Romani libri IIII (cf. Augustine, 'De civitate dei' xxi. 8.) De sua vita libri III (or On His Own Life in Three Books) De familiis troianis (or On the Families of Troy) De Antiquitate Litterarum libri II (addressed to the tragic poet Lucius Accius; it is therefore one of his earliest writings) De Origine Linguae Latinae libri III (addressed to Pompey; cf. Augustine, 'De civitate dei' xxii. 28.) Περί Χαρακτήρων (in at least three books, on the formation of words) Quaestiones Plautinae libri V (containing interpretations of rare words found in the comedies of Plautus) De Similitudine Verborum libri III (on regularity in forms and words) De Utilitate Sermonis libri IIII (on the principle of anomaly or irregularity) De Sermone Latino [it] libri V (?) (addressed to Marcellus,[17] on orthography and the metres of poetry) De philosophia (cf. Augustine, 'De civitate dei' xix. 1.) Most of the extant fragments of these works (mostly the grammatical works) can be found in the Goetz–Schoell edition of De Lingua Latina, pp. 199–242; in the collection of Wilmanns, pp. 170–223; and in that of Funaioli, pp. 179–371. References[edit] ^ "Marcus Terentius Varro | Roman author". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 12 January 2017. ^ "LacusCurtius • Varro On Agriculture – Book I". penelope.uchicago.edu. Retrieved 12 January 2017. ^ a b Baynes, Thomas Spencer (1891). The Encyclopaedia Britannica: A Dictionary of Arts, Sciences, and General Literature. C. Scribner's sons. ^ Caesar; Damon, Cynthia (2016). Civil War. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0674997035. ^ Prioreschi, Plinio (1996). A History of Medicine: Roman medicine. Horatius Press. ISBN 978-1888456035. ^ a b Lindberg, David (2007). The Beginnings of Western Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. p. 137. ISBN 978-0-226-48205-7. Retrieved 6 March 2010. ^ Flower, Harriet I., director de la publicación. (2014). The Cambridge companion to the Roman Republic. Cambridge University Press. p. 177. ISBN 978-1-107-66942-0. OCLC 904729745.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) ^ Flower, Harriet I., director de la publicación. (2014). The Cambridge companion to the Roman Republic. Cambridge University Press. p. 193. ISBN 978-1-107-66942-0. OCLC 904729745.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) ^ Quintilian. "Chapter 1". Institutio Oratoria. Book X. Verse 95. ^ Plutarch. Life of Romulus. New York: Modern Library. p. 31. ^ Harrison, Fairfax (1918). "Note Upon the Roman Agronomists". Roman Farm Management. New York: The Macmillan Company. pp. 1–14 [10]. ^ Varro, Marcus Terentius (2014) [1934]. De Re Rustica. Loeb Classical Library. I.12.2 – via Bill Thayer's Website. ^ Thompson, Sue (March 2014). "From Ground to Tap" (PDF). The Mole: 3 (sidebar). Archived from the original on 12 October 2014. Retrieved 21 August 2017. ^ Hempelmann, Ernst; Krafts, Kristine (October 2013). "Bad Air, Amulets and Mosquitoes: 2,000 Years of Changing Perspectives on Malaria". Malaria Journal. 12: 232. doi:10.1186/1475-2875-12-232. ISSN 1475-2875. PMC 3723432. PMID 23835014. ^ "Marcus Terentius Varro | Roman author". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 4 January 2019. ^ Wilmanns, Augustus (1864). "II:97". De M. Terenti Varronis Libris Grammaticis. Gutenberg. Berlin: Weidmann. Marcellus autem ad quem haec uolumina misit quis fuerit nescio. ^ Several people called Marcellus lived during Varro's time. The identity of this one is unclear.[16] Further reading[edit] Cardauns, B. Marcus Terentius Varro: Einführung in sein Werk. Heidelberger Studienhefte zur Altertumswissenschaft. Heidelberg, Germany: C. Winter, 2001. d’Alessandro, P. “Varrone e la tradizione metrica antica”. Spudasmata, volume 143. Hildesheim; Zürich; New York: Georg Olms Verlag, 2012. Dahlmann, H.M. “Terentius Varro. Paulys Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft”. Supplement 6, Abretten bis Thunudromon. Edited by Wilhelm Kroll, 1172–1277. Stuttgart: Metzler, 1935. Ferriss-Hill, J. “Varro’s Intuition of Cognate Relationships.” Illinois Classical Studies, volume 39, 2014, pp. 81–108. Freudenburg, K. "The Afterlife of Varro in Horace's Sermones: Generic Issues in Roman Satire." Generic Interfaces in Latin Literature: Encounters, Interactions and Transformations, edited by Stavros Frangoulidis, De Gruyter, 2013, pp. 297–336. Kronenberg, L. Allegories of Farming from Greece and Rome: Philosophical Satire in Xenophon, Varro and Virgil. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009. Nelsestuen, G. Varro the Agronomist: Political Philosophy, Satire, and Agriculture in the Late Republic. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2015. Richardson, J.S. “The Triumph of Metellus Scipio and the Dramatic Date of Varro, RR 3.” The Classical Quarterly, volume 33, no. 2, 1983, pp. 456–463. Taylor, D.J.. Declinatio : A Study of the Linguistic Theory of Marcus Terentius Varro. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1974. Van Nuffelen, P. “Varro’s Divine Antiquities: Roman Religion as an Image of Truth.” Classical Philology, volume 105, no. 2, 2010, pp. 162–188. External links[edit] Wikiquote has quotations related to: Marcus Terentius Varro Wikisource has original works written by or about: Marcus Terentius Varro Library resources about Varro Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries By Varro Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries Works by Marcus Terentius Varro at Project Gutenberg Works by or about Marcus Terentius Varro at Internet Archive Works by Marcus Terentius Varro at LibriVox (public domain audiobooks) de Re Rustica (Latin and English at LacusCurtius) Links to translation of De Linga Latina by R.G.Kent Livius.org: Varronian chronology thelatinlibrary.com: Latin works of Varro Oxford Classical Dictionary Oxford Bibliographies v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films Authority control BIBSYS: 90211288 BNE: XX958574 BNF: cb119277168 (data) CANTIC: a10470086 CiNii: DA01363600 GND: 118626183 ISNI: 0000 0001 2145 2047 LCCN: n79060808 LNB: 000008974 NKC: jn19981002308 NLA: 35578074 NLG: 62600 NSK: 000086182 NTA: 068689209 RERO: 02-A000170572 SELIBR: 200670 SNAC: w6xs8cs1 SUDOC: 027177866 Trove: 1002016 VcBA: 495/44942 VIAF: 100219311 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n79060808 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marcus_Terentius_Varro&oldid=996035527" Categories: 116 BC births 27 BC deaths 1st-century BC Romans 1st-century BC writers Ancient linguists Ancient Roman antiquarians Ancient Roman scholars of religion Ancient Roman soldiers Ancient Roman writers Encyclopedias in Classical Antiquity Encyclopedists Geoponici Golden Age Latin writers Latin-language writers People from Rieti Recipients of ancient Roman pardons Roman-era students in Athens Terentii Hidden categories: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list CS1: long volume value Use dmy dates from May 2014 All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from July 2019 Articles with Project Gutenberg links Articles with Internet Archive links Articles with LibriVox links Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CANTIC identifiers Wikipedia articles with CINII identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with LNB identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLG identifiers Wikipedia articles with NSK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with RERO identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SNAC-ID identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with Trove identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikiquote Wikisource Languages العربية Asturianu Български Brezhoneg Català Čeština Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français Furlan Galego 한국어 Հայերեն Hrvatski Bahasa Indonesia Íslenska Italiano עברית ქართული Latina Latviešu Magyar Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Polski Português Română Русский Shqip Simple English Slovenčina Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Türkçe Türkmençe Українська 吴语 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 24 December 2020, at 04:46 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1305 ---- Vicarius - Wikipedia Vicarius From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search For other uses of "vicar", see Vicar (disambiguation). Ancient Rome This article is part of a series on the politics and government of ancient Rome Periods Roman Kingdom 753–509 BC Roman Republic 509–27 BC Roman Empire 27 BC – AD 395 Principate 27 BC – AD 284 Dominate AD 284–641 Western AD 395–476 Eastern AD 395–1453 Timeline Roman Constitution Constitution of the Kingdom Constitution of the Republic Constitution of the Empire Constitution of the Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Executive magistrates Precedent and law Roman law Ius Imperium Mos maiorum Collegiality Auctoritas Roman citizenship Cursus honorum Senatus consultum Senatus consultum ultimum Assemblies Centuriate Curiate Plebeian Tribal Ordinary magistrates Consul Praetor Quaestor Promagistrate Aedile Tribune Censor Governor Extraordinary magistrates Corrector Dictator Magister equitum Consular tribune Rex Triumviri Decemviri Titles and honours Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Praeses Praefectus Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Other countries v t e Original dioceses of the Roman Empire, created by emperor Diocletian (284–305) Later dioceses of the Roman Empire, around 400 AD Vicarius is a Latin word, meaning substitute or deputy. It is the root of the English word "vicar". History[edit] Originally, in ancient Rome, this office was equivalent to the later English "vice-" (as in "deputy"), used as part of the title of various officials. Each vicarius was assigned to a specific superior official, after whom his full title was generally completed by a genitive (e.g. vicarius praetoris). At a low level of society, the slave of a slave, possibly hired out to raise money to buy manumission, was a servus vicarius.[1] Later, in the 290s, the Emperor Diocletian carried out a series of administrative reforms, ushering in the period of the Dominate. These reforms also saw the number of Roman provinces increased, and the creation of a new administrative level, the diocese. The dioceses, initially twelve, grouped several provinces, each with its own governor. The dioceses were headed by a vicarius, or, more properly, by a vices agens praefecti praetorio ("deputy of the praetorian prefect"). An exception was the Diocese of the East, which was headed by a comes ("count"). In 370 or 381 Egypt and Cyrenaica were detached from the Diocese of the East and made a diocese under an official called the Augustal Prefect. In the eastern parts of the Empire, dominated by Greek language and common use of Greek terminology, vicarius was called exarch.[2] According to the Notitia dignitatum (an early 5th century imperial chancery document), the vicarius had the rank of vir spectabilis; the staff of a vicarius, his officium, was rather similar to a gubernatorial officium. For example, in the diocese of Hispania, his staff included: The princeps (i.e. chief of staff) was chosen from among the senior agentes in rebus (couriers or special investigators, 'men of affairs,' from the ministry of the interior headed by the master of the offices), from the salaried class of the ducenarii (those earning 200,000 sesterces a year - the highest regular pay grade in the Roman civil service; the highest officials, governors and above, were not civil service). A cornicularius ("chief of staff"). Two numerarii (chief accountants). A commentariensis ("keeper of the commentary", the official diary). An adiutor (adjutant; literally "helper", an assistant). An ab actis ("acts-keeper", archivist). A cura epistolarum ("curator of correspondence"). An unnamed number of subadiuvae ("deputy assistants"). Various exceptores (lower clerks). Singulares et reliquum officium (various menial staff). References[edit] ^ P. R. C. Weaver. "Vicarius and Vicarianus in the Familia Caesaris". The Journal of Roman Studies 54.1 and 2 (1964:117–128). ^ Meyendorff 1989. Sources[edit] Ostrogorsky, George (1956). History of the Byzantine State. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link) Meyendorff, John (1989). Imperial unity and Christian divisions: The Church 450-680 A.D. The Church in history. 2. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir's Seminary Press. ISBN 9780881410563.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link) Notitia dignitatum Pauly-Wissowa (in German) v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vicarius&oldid=981686834" Categories: Ancient Roman titles Hidden categories: CS1 maint: ref=harv Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages العربية Català Deutsch Español Bahasa Indonesia Italiano Latina Lietuvių Magyar Nederlands Norsk bokmål Português Svenska Türkçe Edit links This page was last edited on 3 October 2020, at 20:53 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1308 ---- Political history of the Roman military - Wikipedia Political history of the Roman military From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Part of a series on the Military of ancient Rome 753 BC – AD 476 Structural history Army Unit types and ranks Decorations and punishments Legions Auxilia Generals Navy Fleets Admirals Campaign history Wars and battles Technological history Military engineering Castra Siege engines Triumphal arches Roads Political history   Strategy and tactics Infantry tactics Frontiers and fortifications Limes Limes Britannicus Antonine Wall Hadrian's Wall Saxon Shore Limes Germanicus Alb Limes Lauter Valley Limes Lower Germanic Limes Main Limes Neckar-Odenwald Limes Upper Germanic-Rhaetian Limes Wetterau Limes Danube–Iller–Rhine Limes Norican Limes Claustra Alpium Iuliarum Pannonian Limes Limes Alutanus Limes Moesiae Trajan's Wall Anastasian Wall Limes Sarmatiae Limes Arabicus Limes Tripolitanus Limes Mauretaniae  Ancient Rome portal •  War portal v t e Rome's military was always tightly keyed to its political system. In the Roman kingdom the social standing of a person impacted both his political and military roles, which were often organised into familial clans such as the Julia. These clans often wielded a large amount of power and were huge influences through the Roman Kingdom into the Republic. The political system was from an early date based upon competition within the ruling elite, the Patricians. Senators in the Republic competed fiercely for public office, the most coveted of which was the post of Consul.[1] Two were elected each year to head the government of the state, and would be assigned a consular army and an area in which to campaign.[1] From Gaius Marius and Sulla onwards, control of the army began to be tied into the political ambitions of individuals, leading to the first triumvirate of the 1st century BC and the resulting Caesar’s civil war. The late Republic and Empire was increasingly plagued by usurpations led by or supported by the military, leading to the crisis of the third century in the late empire. Contents 1 Roman kingdom 2 Roman Republic 3 From late Republic to mid-Roman Empire 4 Middle Roman Empire 5 Late Roman Empire 6 Political economy of the Roman military 7 References Roman kingdom[edit] Under the Etruscan king Servius Tullius, a person's social standing and wealth determined both their political and military role: following his reforms, a rich man would have had greater voting rights, and greater standing within the military, than a poor man. A further politicization of the military involved officers for a unit not belonging to and being drawn from the class of the military unit he commanded but being selected often through voting.[2] Roman Republic[edit] In the republic, the tradition of social class determining military duty continued, despite structural changes - the rich equestrians continued to serve together in the equites for instance - but the lower ranks became less politicized and based upon a mix of social class, age and military experience rather than social class alone. For non-citizens, 25 years in the army was a guaranteed way of gaining citizenship for them and their family.[2] Despite these changes on the bottom rungs of the military, amongst the army's commanders a process began of politicizing military command. In the Republic, military service made a person of the equestrian class eligible for a wide range of profitable postings: military triumphs boosted a person's career, and military service became a pre-requirement for a number of political posts. Intended initially to ensure that all political leaders had shown dedication and duty serving in the military, the effect was to cause military experience to become of paramount importance to a Roman's political career, with the eventual consequence that armies would become tools for the political goals of their generals, rather than neutrally aligned forces of the state. At the highest level, two consuls were elected each year to head the government of the state and simultaneously were appointed the commanders-in-chief of the Roman army, and would be assigned a consular army and an area in which to campaign.[3] From late Republic to mid-Roman Empire[edit] In 100 BC, Lucius Appuleius Saturninus was tribune and advocated several social reforms, among which was a bill that gave colonial lands to war veterans, a suggestion that was radical and displeasing to the patrician senate, which opposed the measures. Violence broke out and the Senate ordered Gaius Marius, as Consul for that year, to put down the revolt. Marius, although he was generally allied with the radicals, complied with the request and put down the revolt in the interest of public order.[4] The political issue of land allocation for Rome's military veterans would return several times to haunt the state including 14 AD when an army in central Europe mutinied over the failure of the state to provide land plots for soldiers. After the conclusion of the Social War, certain of Rome's eastern provinces became under threat of invasion and it was necessary to raise an army to counter the threat. The choice before the Senate was to put either Consul Marius or Consul Sulla in command of an army. There was already a fierce rivalry between the two, in part due to a competitive instinct amongst the two as successful generals, but more importantly distrust on Sulla's part that Marius held unhealthy ambitions.[5] The Roman Republic was always on guard against any citizen gaining too much prominence, lest he seize power and restore Rome as a kingdom; thus a series of checks and balances existed, such as consuls having to be re-elected annually.[6] Marius had already served five consulships and enjoyed widespread popularity. The senate made its decision and Sulla was given the job but a short time later the decision was reversed by the Assembly, and Marius placed in command. Already wary of Marius' prominence and previous five terms as consul, and (rightly) suspecting bribery in the securing of the position to command the army (Marius had promised to erase the debts of Publius Sulpicius Rufus), Sulla refused to acknowledge the validity of the Assembly's action.[7] Sulla left Rome and traveled to reach the army waiting in Nola, the army the Senate had asked him to lead against Mithridates. Sulla urged his legions to defy the Assembly's orders and accept him as their rightful leader. Sulla was successful and the legions stoned the representatives from the Assembly when they arrived, defying the state's orders. Sulla then commanded six legions to march with him to Rome. This was a momentous event, and was unforeseen by Marius, as no Roman army had ever marched upon Rome - it was forbidden by law and ancient tradition. Marius fled with no great loss of life and Sulla later disbanded his legions and re-established consular government, but the military had been shown to be able to be used as a political tool of individuals. It was a pattern to be repeated more famously later by Caesar.[7] During the First Triumvirate of Julius Caesar, Pompey and Crassus, each of the triumvires used military success to enhance their own political and public status. The incredibly wealthy consul Crassus, who had earlier displayed his wealth by entertaining the populace of Rome at a huge party with 10,000 tables, personally raised and funded six legions from his personal wealth. Whilst he did not at this time use them for marching on Rome in direct furtherance of his own career, his desperation to rival the military campaigns of Pompey that led to recognition in the public eye means that his motives are unlikely to have been entirely selfless. Rather, it was another step in the severance of the direct connection between state and troops that saw armies increasingly become tied to their generals' political careers.[8] When the triumvirate collapsed, Caesar crossed the Rubicon river and marched his armies upon Rome itself. This turning of an army loyal to its general against the state had occurred before under Sulla, but the circumstances were different this time: Sulla felt at least partly justified in his march on Rome by the alleged and probably real corruption of the political system by Marius, and by Marius' own quest for primacy as a political figure against a political backdrop that sought to prevent any person becoming too prominent. Caesar, on the other hand, marched his army against Rome purely for his own purposes. It is true that the political maneuverings of Pompey, which made it possible for Caesar to be prosecuted on his return to Rome, pushed Caesar into marching on Rome, but the fact that almost the entire senate fled alongside Pompey shows that Caesar's actions were at least perceived to be an act against the state itself rather than the person of Pompey: Caesar's power base was built almost exclusively on the loyalty of the soldiers who had served under him campaigning several years.[9] Unlike Sulla, Caesar also failed to revert power to the state when the threat of Pompey had been removed, not just keeping his position as de facto ruler of the state but, immediately on his return from defeating Pompey, naming his grand-nephew Gaius Octavius (Octavian) as the heir to his title, a wholly unconstitutional act. In everything but name, the army had placed the first Emperor on the throne of Rome.[10] The years following the fall of the republic were peaceful and relatively benign with the military not involving itself greatly in political affairs - such that the term Pax Augusti is often used - perhaps because the military was expending most of its energy in territorial expansion of the empire.[10] The Roman senate and emperors were not blind to the possibility of rebellion by its troops as generals could gain the loyalty of his officers through a mixture of personal charisma, promises and simple bribes: once the general and officers had a unity of purpose the rigid discipline of the military meant that the troops would normally follow. Only later seemingly did the situation reverse and the soldiers began to dictate action to the officers and generals, raising generals to Emperors even when the generals themselves were completely lacking such ambition or wishes. However, the state saw itself as relatively safe from such rebellions in the early imperial period. The reason for this safety from rebellion is that for a rebellion to be successful it was necessary for an usurper to gain control of a certain percentage of the army in order to stand some chance of success. Sulla and Caesar had managed such actions because the consular system of that period had concentrated in their hands a large proportion of the small number of armies in service of the state at the time. In the expanding empire, legions under generals were spread out across the extent of the Roman borders and it was not easy for one man to seize control of a great part of them, perhaps only commonly being in control of two or so legions. However, later larger-scale wars necessitated the concentration of greater military power in the hands of generals. There is evidence of emperors holding some members of generals' families as hostage to ensure their loyalty.[11] Middle Roman Empire[edit] By the mid Empire the military's involvement in politics had increased to the degree such that 193 AD saw no less than five emperors as armies heralded their generals as emperors or even, as after the death of Pertinax, murdered the Emperor and then sold the empire at auction to the highest bidder. Likewise, from 211 to the accession of Diocletian and the establishment of the Tetrarchy in 293, Rome saw 28 emperors of which only two had a natural death (from the plague). However, there were also 38 usurpers who raised revolts across the empire. Successful usurpers were usually either provincial governors, commanders of a large grouping of Roman legions, or prefects of the Praetorian guard, which had control of Rome, where the Imperial palace still lay. The problem of usurpation seems to have lain at least partially in the lack of a clear tradition enshrined in law and popular will of an agreed method of ensuring succession, and also in the maintenance of large standing armies. The former problem was evident from the very first emperor Augustus and meant that those claiming imperial power via various means, and whether they went on to become emperor or be denounced as usurpers, could all claim some form of legitimacy. The latter problem meant that there were always men remote from their duties and loyalties in Rome and in command or large armies marching under their discipline and command.[12] The usurpation mania of the 3rd century had profound effects in the military organization of the Empire. One of the most striking changes was the division and multiplication of the Roman provinces. The greater the manpower a provincial governor had under his command, the greater the temptation to make a bid to the throne. Thus, provinces were slowly[citation needed] divided into smaller units to avoid concentration of power and military capacity in the hands of one man.[12] Late Roman Empire[edit] See also: late Roman Empire, tetrarchy, and late Roman army The beginning of the end of the Roman Empire did not start in a way that foreshadowed the downfall of a great power. The latter part of the Roman reign began when Diocletian (r. 284-305 AD) emerged. Diocletian was a strong and able leader but by creating smaller provinces, he effectively split the empire into two parts - East and West. The maintenance of legions in a "strategic reserve" some distance behind the frontier and close to the emperors must also have been partially attributable to a need to preserve against rebellion by Roman border armies as much as against external invasion by an enemy. He also established the tetrarchy in 293 AD by appointing Maximian, who played the role of a co-emperor, as well as Galerius and Constantius Chlorus, who were subordinate but powerful nonetheless.[12] Constantius' son Constantine would reunite the halves 31 years later and founded a new capital at Constantinople in 330 AD. Ultimately, the Empire itself was destroyed because of the eventual loyalty of its troops to their commanders over their state. In 476, Odoacer was appointed leader of the foederati troops of Rome, and deposed the emperor, proclaiming himself King of Italy.[12] Political economy of the Roman military[edit] There is evidence that starvation among Roman troops could induce them to mutiny. These mutinies, in turn, could then lead to political instability, including the assassination of the emperor himself.[13] References[edit] ^ a b Leonhard, Schmitz. "Consul". ^ a b Hope, Valerie. "Social Pecking Order in the Roman World". BBC. ^ Rodriguez, Tommy. "The World of the Ancient Romans - Warfare". theancientworld.net. ^ Sampson, Gareth (2012-10-26). Appuleius Saturninus, Lucius. The Encyclopedia of Ancient History. p. 1. doi:10.1002/9781444338386.wbeah20011. ISBN 9781444338386. ^ Keaveney, Arthur (2012-10-26). Social War, Roman Republic. The Encyclopedia of Ancient History. doi:10.1002/9781444338386.wbeah20125. ISBN 9781444338386. ^ Halsall, Paul (August 2000). "The Roman Republic: Checks and Balances". sourcebooks.fordham.edu. ^ a b Morey, William (1901). Outlines of Roman History. New York, Cincinnati, Chicago: American Book Company. ^ "Marcus Licinius Crassus | First Triumvirate". sites.psu.edu. Retrieved 2017-05-09. ^ McManus, Barbara. "Julius Caesar: Historical Background". VROMA. ^ a b Watkins, Thayer. "The Timeline of the Life of Octavian, Caesar Augustus". ^ Wasson, Donald. "Roman Emperor". Ancient History Encyclopedia. Ancient History Encyclopedia. ^ a b c d Lightfoot, Author: Christopher. "The Roman Empire (27 B.C.–393 A.D.) | Essay | Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History | The Metropolitan Museum of Art". The Met’s Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History. Retrieved 2017-05-09. ^ Christian, Cornelius. "Shocks to military support and subsequent assassinations in Ancient Rome". Economics Letters. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2018.06.030. Missing or empty |url= (help) v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Political_history_of_the_Roman_military&oldid=991772532" Categories: Military history of ancient Rome Hidden categories: Pages using web citations with no URL All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from September 2013 Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Español Edit links This page was last edited on 1 December 2020, at 19:14 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1341 ---- Theodore Martin - Wikipedia Theodore Martin From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia   (Redirected from Sir Theodore Martin) Jump to navigation Jump to search Theodore Martin Born 16 September 1816  Died 18 August 1909  (aged 92) Nationality Scottish Alma mater University of Edinburgh Spouse(s) Helena Faucit  Sir Theodore Martin KCB KCVO (16 September 1816 – 18 August 1909) was a Scottish poet, biographer, and translator. Contents 1 Biography 2 References 3 Sources 4 External links Biography[edit] Portrait by Thomas Duncan, 1826 Martin was the son of James Martin, a solicitor in Edinburgh, where Theodore was born and educated at the Royal High School and University. He practised as a solicitor in Edinburgh 1840–45, after which he went to London and became head of the firm of Martin and Leslie, parliamentary agents. His first contribution to literature was the humorous Bon Gaultier Ballads, written along with W.E. Aytoun, which remained popular for a long time; originally contributed to a magazine, they appeared in book form in 1845. Funerary monument, Brompton Cemetery, London Martin's translations include Dante's Vita Nuova, Oehlenschläger's Correggio and Aladdin, Heinrich Heine's Poems and Ballads, Friedrich Schiller's Wilhelm Tell, and Hertz's King René's Daughter.[1] He also published a complete translation of Horace with a Life, and one of Catullus. He is probably best known for his Life of the Prince Consort (1874–80), the writing of which was entrusted to him by Queen Victoria, a work which won him her lifelong friendship. He also wrote Lives of Professor Aytoun and Lord Lyndhurst. In 1851 he married Helena Faucit, a well-known actress, and author of studies on Shakespeare's Female Characters, whose Life he published in 1901. The couple lived for some time at Bryntysilio {The Hill of St. Tyssilio} which he bought in 1861, near Llangollen, where in 1889 they were visited by the queen during her progress in Wales. Martin kept up his intellectual activity into old age, published in 1905 a translation of Leopardi's poems, and Monographs (1906). He was Lord Rector of St. Andrews 1881, LL.D. of Edinburgh 1875, and Knight Commander of the Order of the Bath 1880. He died in 1909 and is buried in Brompton Cemetery, London. References[edit] ^ Martin, Theodore. King René's daughter: a Danish lyrical drama, W. Crosby and H.P. Nichols, 1850. Sources[edit]  This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Cousin, John William (1910). "Martin, Sir Theodore". A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature. London: J. M. Dent & Sons – via Wikisource. Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Martin, Sir Theodore" . Encyclopædia Britannica. 17 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. Lee, Sidney, ed. (1912). "Martin, Theodore" . Dictionary of National Biography (2nd supplement). 2. London: Smith, Elder & Co. Ward, A. W.; Basu, Sayoni. "Martin, Sir Theodore (1816–1909)". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/34906. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.) External links[edit] Wikimedia Commons has media related to Sir Theodore Martin. Wikisource has original works written by or about: Theodore Martin Works by Theodore Martin at Project Gutenberg Works by or about Theodore Martin at Internet Archive Academic offices Preceded by Earl of Selborne Rector of the University of St Andrews 1880 - 1883 Succeeded by Lord Reay Authority control BNE: XX5552482 BNF: cb16666021p (data) GND: 116807806 ISNI: 0000 0003 6854 3557 LCCN: n83071958 NLA: 35331182 NLI: 000089619 NTA: 181386429 SELIBR: 306782 SNAC: w6ms3rgv SUDOC: 143242768 Trove: 914393 VcBA: 495/200869 VIAF: 773560 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n83071958 v t e Rectors of the University of St Andrews Sir Ralph Anstruther William Stirling-Maxwell John Stuart Mill J. A. Froude Lord Neaves Arthur Penrhyn Stanley Lord Selborne Sir Theodore Martin Lord Reay Arthur Balfour Marquess of Dufferin and Ava Marquess of Bute James Stuart Andrew Carnegie Baron Avebury Earl of Rosebery Earl of Aberdeen Sir Douglas Haig Sir J. M. Barrie Rudyard Kipling Fridtjof Nansen Sir Wilfred Grenfell Jan Smuts Guglielmo Marconi Lord MacGregor Mitchell Sir David Munro Sir George Cunningham Lord Burghley Earl of Crawford Viscount Kilmuir Baron Boothby Sir Charles P. Snow Sir John Rothenstein Sir Learie Constantine, Baron Constantine John Cleese Alan Coren Frank Muir Tim Brooke-Taylor Katharine Whitehorn Stanley Adams Nicholas Parsons Nicky Campbell Donald Findlay Andrew Neil Sir Clement Freud Simon Pepper Kevin Dunion Alistair Moffat Catherine Stihler Srđa Popović Leyla Hussein Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Theodore_Martin&oldid=988252718" Categories: 1816 births 1909 deaths Alumni of the University of Edinburgh People educated at the Royal High School, Edinburgh People from Edinburgh Scottish poets Scottish biographers Knights Commander of the Order of the Bath Knights Commander of the Royal Victorian Order Burials at Brompton Cemetery Rectors of the University of St Andrews 19th-century poets Hidden categories: Use dmy dates from October 2017 Use British English from October 2017 Articles with hCards Articles using Template Infobox person Wikidata Wikipedia articles incorporating text from A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica with Wikisource reference Articles incorporating Cite DNB template Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the ODNB Commons category link is on Wikidata Articles with Project Gutenberg links Articles with Internet Archive links Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLI identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SNAC-ID identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with Trove identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikisource Languages Dansk Deutsch Italiano مصرى Svenska Edit links This page was last edited on 12 November 2020, at 01:16 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-134 ---- Jerome - Wikipedia Jerome From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia   (Redirected from St Jerome) Jump to navigation Jump to search This article is about the priest and Bible translator. For other uses, see Jerome (disambiguation) and Saint Jerome (disambiguation). 4th and 5th-century Catholic priest, theologian, and saint Saint Jerome Saint Jerome in the Desert by Bernardino Pinturicchio (c. 1475–1480) Hermit and Doctor of the Church Born c. 342-347 Stridon (possibly Strido Dalmatiae, on the border of Dalmatia and Pannonia) (located in modern Croatia)[1] Died 30 September 420 (aged c. 73-78)[2] Bethlehem, Palaestina Prima Venerated in Catholic Church Eastern Orthodox Church Oriental Orthodoxy Anglican Communion Lutheranism Major shrine Basilica of Saint Mary Major, Rome, Italy Feast 30 September (Latin Catholic Church) Attributes lion, cardinal attire, cross, skull, trumpet, owl, books and writing material Patronage archaeologists; archivists; Bible scholars; librarians; libraries; school children; students; translators; Morong, Rizal Saint Jerome St Jerome in Penitence Education Catechetical School of Alexandria Occupation Translator, theologian and writer Notable work The Vulgate De viris illustribus Chronicon Theological work Language Latin and Greek language Tradition or movement Trinitarianism Main interests Apologetics Notable ideas Perpetual virginity of Mary Part of a series on Catholic philosophy   Aquinas, Scotus, and Ockham Ethics Cardinal virtues Just price Just war Probabilism Natural law Personalism Social teaching Virtue ethics Schools Augustinianism Cartesianism Molinism Occamism Salamanca Scholasticism Neo-scholasticism Scotism Thomism Philosophers Ancient Ambrose Athanasius the Great Augustine of Hippo Clement of Alexandria Cyprian of Carthage Cyril of Alexandria Gregory of Nyssa Irenaeus of Lyons Jerome John Chrysostom John of Damascus Justin Martyr Origen Paul the Apostle Tertullian Postclassical Pseudo-Dionysius Boethius Isidore of Seville Scotus Eriugena Bede Anselm of Canterbury Hildegard of Bingen Peter Abelard Symeon the New Theologian Bernard of Clairvaux Hugh of Saint Victor Thomas Aquinas Benedict of Nursia Pope Gregory I Peter Lombard Bonaventure Albertus Magnus Duns Scotus Roger Bacon Giles of Rome James of Viterbo Giambattista Vico Gregory of Rimini William of Ockham Catherine of Siena Paul of Venice Modern Baltasar Gracián Erasmus of Rotterdam Thomas Cajetan Nicholas of Cusa Luis de Molina Teresa of Ávila Thomas More Francis de Sales Francisco de Vitoria Domingo de Soto Martín de Azpilcueta Tomás de Mercado Antoine Arnauld René Descartes Robert Bellarmine Ignacy Krasicki Hugo Kołłątaj François Fénelon Alphonsus Liguori Nicolas Malebranche Blaise Pascal Francisco Suárez Giovanni Botero Felicité de Lamennais Antonio Rosmini John Henry Newman Contemporary Pope Benedict XVI Pope John Paul II G. E. M. Anscombe Hans Urs von Balthasar Maurice Blondel G. K. Chesterton Yves Congar Henri de Lubac John Finnis Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange Étienne Gilson René Girard Nicolás Gómez Dávila Romano Guardini John Haldane Dietrich von Hildebrand Bernard Lonergan Marshall McLuhan Alasdair MacIntyre Gabriel Marcel Jean-Luc Marion Jacques Maritain Emmanuel Mounier Josef Pieper Karl Rahner Edith Stein Charles Taylor  Catholicism portal  Philosophy portal v t e Jerome (/dʒəˈroʊm/; Latin: Eusebius Sophronius Hieronymus; Greek: Εὐσέβιος Σωφρόνιος Ἱερώνυμος; c. 342-347 – 30 September 420), also known as Jerome of Stridon, was a Latin priest, confessor, theologian, and historian; he is commonly known as Saint Jerome. Jerome was born at Stridon, a village near Emona on the border of Dalmatia and Pannonia.[3][4][5] He is best known for his translation of most of the Bible into Latin (the translation that became known as the Vulgate) and his commentaries on the Gospels. His list of writings is extensive.[6] The protégé of Pope Damasus I who died in December of 384, Jerome was known for his teachings on Christian moral life, especially to those living in cosmopolitan centers such as Rome. In many cases, he focused his attention on the lives of women and identified how a woman devoted to Jesus should live her life. This focus stemmed from his close patron relationships with several prominent female ascetics who were members of affluent senatorial families.[7] Jerome is recognised as a saint and Doctor of the Church by the Catholic Church, the Eastern Orthodox Church, the Lutheran Church, and the Anglican Communion.[8] His feast day is 30 September. Contents 1 Life 2 Conversion to Christianity 3 After Rome 4 Death 5 Translation of the Bible (382–405) 6 Commentaries (405–420) 7 Historical and hagiographic writings 7.1 Description of vitamin A deficiency 8 Letters 9 Theological writings 9.1 Eschatology 10 Reception by later Christianity 11 In art 12 See also 13 References 13.1 Bibliography 14 Further reading 15 External links 15.1 Latin texts 15.1.1 Facsimiles 15.2 English translations Life[edit] Eusebius Sophronius Hieronymus was born at Stridon around 342-347 AD.[9] He was of Illyrian ancestry,[10] although whether he was able to speak the Illyrian languages is a subject of controversy. He was not baptized until about 360–369 in Rome, where he had gone with his friend Bonosus of Sardica to pursue rhetorical and philosophical studies. (This Bosonus may or may not have been the same Bonosus whom Jerome identifies as his friend who went to live as a hermit on an island in the Adriatic.) Jerome studied under the grammarian Aelius Donatus. There he learned Latin and at least some Greek,[11] though he probably did not yet acquire the familiarity with Greek literature that he later claimed to have acquired as a schoolboy.[12] As a student, Jerome engaged in the superficial escapades and sexual experimentation of students in Rome; he indulged himself quite casually but he suffered terrible bouts of guilt afterwards.[13][better source needed] To appease his conscience, on Sundays he visited the sepulchers of the martyrs and the Apostles in the catacombs. This experience reminded him of the terrors of hell: Often I would find myself entering those crypts, deep dug in the earth, with their walls on either side lined with the bodies of the dead, where everything was so dark that almost it seemed as though the Psalmist's words were fulfilled, Let them go down quick into Hell.[14] Here and there the light, not entering in through windows, but filtering down from above through shafts, relieved the horror of the darkness. But again, as soon as you found yourself cautiously moving forward, the black night closed around and there came to my mind the line of Virgil, "Horror ubique animos, simul ipsa silentia terrent".[15][16] St. Jerome in His Study (1480), by Domenico Ghirlandaio. His quote from Virgil reads: "On all sides round horror spread wide; the very silence breathed a terror on my soul"[17]—to describe the horror of hell. He initially used classical authors to describe Christian concepts such as hell that indicated both his classical education and his deep shame of their associated practices, such as the pederasty then found in Rome.[citation needed] Conversion to Christianity[edit] St Jerome in the Nuremberg Chronicle Although initially skeptical of Christianity, he eventually converted.[18] After several years in Rome, he travelled with Bonosus to Gaul and settled in Trier where he seems to have first taken up theological studies, and where, for his friend Tyrannius Rufinus, he copied Hilary of Poitiers' commentary on the Psalms and the treatise De synodis. Next came a stay of at least several months, or possibly years, with Rufinus at Aquileia, where he made many Christian friends. Some of these accompanied Jerome when in about 373 he set out on a journey through Thrace and Asia Minor into northern Syria. At Antioch, where he stayed the longest, two of his companions died and he himself was seriously ill more than once. During one of these illnesses (about the winter of 373–374), he had a vision that led him to lay aside his secular studies and devote himself to God. He seems to have abstained for a considerable time from the study of the classics and to have plunged deeply into study of the Bible, under the impulse of Apollinaris of Laodicea, then teaching in Antioch and not yet suspected of heresy. St. Jerome in the Desert, by Giovanni Bellini (1505) Seized with a desire for a life of ascetic penance, Jerome went for a time to the desert of Chalcis, to the southeast of Antioch, known as the "Syrian Thebaid" from the number of eremites inhabiting it. During this period, he seems to have found time for studying and writing. He made his first attempt to learn Hebrew under the guidance of a converted Jew; and he seems to have been in correspondence with Jewish Christians in Antioch. Around this time he had copied for him a Hebrew Gospel, of which fragments are preserved in his notes. It is known today as the Gospel of the Hebrews which the Nazarenes considered to be the true Gospel of Matthew.[19] Jerome translated parts of this Hebrew Gospel into Greek.[20] Returning to Antioch in 378 or 379, Jerome was ordained there by Bishop Paulinus, apparently unwillingly and on condition that he continue his ascetic life. Soon afterward, he went to Constantinople to pursue a study of Scripture under Gregory Nazianzen. He seems to have spent two years there, then left, and for the next three (382–385) he was in Rome again, as secretary to Pope Damasus I and the leading Roman Christians. Invited originally for the synod of 382, held to end the schism of Antioch as there were rival claimants to be the proper patriarch in Antioch. Jerome had accompanied one of the claimants, Paulinus, back to Rome to get more support for him; Jerome distinguished himself before the pope and assumed a prominent place in his papal councils. Jerome was given duties in Rome, and he undertook a revision of the Latin Bible based on the Greek manuscripts of the New Testament. He also updated the Psalter containing the Book of Psalms then in use in Rome, based on the Septuagint. Though he did not realize it yet, translating much of what became the Latin Vulgate Bible would take many years and be his most important achievement (see Writings – Translations section below). Saint Jerome in His Study, 1451, by Antonio da Fabriano II, shows writing implements, scrolls, and manuscripts testifying to Jerome's scholarly pursuits.[21] The Walters Art Museum. In Rome, Jerome was surrounded by a circle of well-born and well-educated women, including some from the noblest patrician families, such as the widows Lea, Marcella and Paula, with Paula's daughters Blaesilla and Eustochium. The resulting inclination of these women towards the monastic life, away from the indulgent lasciviousness in Rome, and his unsparing criticism of the secular clergy of Rome, brought a growing hostility against him among the Roman clergy and their supporters. Soon after the death of his patron Pope Damasus I on 10 December 384, Jerome was forced to leave his position at Rome after an inquiry was brought up by the Roman clergy into allegations that he had an improper relationship with the widow Paula. Still, his writings were highly regarded by women who were attempting to maintain a vow of becoming a consecrated virgin. His letters were widely read and distributed throughout the Christian empire and it is clear through his writing that he knew these virgin women were not his only audience.[7] Additionally, Jerome's condemnation of Blaesilla's hedonistic lifestyle in Rome had led her to adopt ascetic practices, but it affected her health and worsened her physical weakness to the point that she died just four months after starting to follow his instructions; much of the Roman populace were outraged at Jerome for causing the premature death of such a lively young woman, and his insistence to Paula that Blaesilla should not be mourned, and complaints that her grief was excessive, were seen as heartless, polarising Roman opinion against him.[22] After Rome[edit] In August 385, Jerome left Rome for good and returned to Antioch, accompanied by his brother Paulinian and several friends, and followed a little later by Paula and Eustochium who had resolved to end their days in the Holy Land. In the winter of 385, Jerome acted as their spiritual adviser. The pilgrims, joined by Bishop Paulinus of Antioch, visited Jerusalem, Bethlehem, and the holy places of Galilee, and then went to Egypt, the home of the great heroes of the ascetic life. At the Catechetical School of Alexandria, Jerome listened to the catechist Didymus the Blind expounding the prophet Hosea and telling his reminiscences of Anthony the Great, who had died 30 years before. Jerome spent some time in Nitria, admiring the disciplined community life of the numerous inhabitants of that "city of the Lord", but detecting even there "concealed serpents", i.e., the influence of Origen of Alexandria. Late in the summer of 388 he was back in Palestine, and spent the remainder of his life working in a cave near Bethlehem, the very cave where Jesus was born,[23] surrounded by a few friends, both men and women (including Paula and Eustochium), to whom he acted as priestly guide and teacher. Saint Jerome in His Study, by Niccolò Antonio Colantonio c. 1445–46, depicts Jerome's removal of a thorn from a lion's paw. Amply provided for by Paula with the means of livelihood and for increasing his collection of books, Jerome led a life of incessant activity in literary production. To these last 34 years of his career belong the most important of his works; his version of the Old Testament from the original Hebrew text, the best of his scriptural commentaries; his catalogue of Christian authors; and the dialogue against the Pelagians, the literary perfection of which even an opponent recognized.[citation needed] To this period also belong most of his polemics, which distinguished him among the orthodox Fathers, including the treatises against the Origenism later declared anathema, of Bishop John II of Jerusalem and his early friend Rufinus. Later, as a result of his writings against Pelagianism, a body of excited partisans broke into the monastic buildings, set them on fire, attacked the inmates and killed a deacon, forcing Jerome to seek safety in a neighboring fortress in 416. Death[edit] It is recorded that Jerome died near Bethlehem on 30 September 420. The date of his death is given by the Chronicon of Prosper of Aquitaine. His remains, originally buried at Bethlehem, are said to have been later transferred to the basilica of Santa Maria Maggiore in Rome, though other places in the West claim some relics, the cathedral at Nepi boasting possession of his head, which, according to another tradition, is in the Escorial.[citation needed] Translation of the Bible (382–405)[edit] Saint Jerome Writing, by Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio, 1607, at St John's Co-Cathedral, Valletta, Malta Jerome was a scholar at a time when that statement implied a fluency in Greek. He knew some Hebrew when he started his translation project, but moved to Jerusalem to strengthen his grip on Jewish scripture commentary. A wealthy Roman aristocrat, Paula, funded his stay in a monastery in Bethlehem and he completed his translation there. He began in 382 by correcting the existing Latin-language version of the New Testament, commonly referred to as the Vetus Latina. By 390 he turned to translating the Hebrew Bible from the original Hebrew, having previously translated portions from the Septuagint which came from Alexandria. He believed that the mainstream Rabbinical Judaism had rejected the Septuagint as invalid Jewish scriptural texts because of what were ascertained as mistranslations along with its Hellenistic heretical elements.[24] He completed this work by 405. Prior to Jerome's Vulgate, all Latin translations of the Old Testament were based on the Septuagint, not the Hebrew. Jerome's decision to use a Hebrew text instead of the previous-translated Septuagint went against the advice of most other Christians, including Augustine, who thought the Septuagint inspired. Modern scholarship, however, has sometimes cast doubts on the actual quality of Jerome's Hebrew knowledge. Many modern scholars believe that the Greek Hexapla is the main source for Jerome's "iuxta Hebraeos" (i.e. "close to the Hebrews", "immediately following the Hebrews") translation of the Old Testament.[25] However, detailed studies have shown that to a considerable degree Jerome was a competent Hebraist.[26] Commentaries (405–420)[edit] Saint Jerome, unknown Southern Dutch artist, 1520, Hamburger Kunsthalle For the next 15 years, until he died, Jerome produced a number of commentaries on Scripture, often explaining his translation choices in using the original Hebrew rather than suspect translations. His patristic commentaries align closely with Jewish tradition, and he indulges in allegorical and mystical subtleties after the manner of Philo and the Alexandrian school. Unlike his contemporaries, he emphasizes the difference between the Hebrew Bible "Apocrypha" and the Hebraica veritas of the protocanonical books. In his Vulgate's prologues, he describes some portions of books in the Septuagint that were not found in the Hebrew as being non-canonical (he called them apocrypha);[27] for Baruch, he mentions by name in his Prologue to Jeremiah and notes that it is neither read nor held among the Hebrews, but does not explicitly call it apocryphal or "not in the canon".[28] His Preface to The Books of Samuel and Kings[29] includes the following statement, commonly called the Helmeted Preface: This preface to the Scriptures may serve as a "helmeted" introduction to all the books which we turn from Hebrew into Latin, so that we may be assured that what is not found in our list must be placed amongst the Apocryphal writings. Wisdom, therefore, which generally bears the name of Solomon, and the book of Jesus, the Son of Sirach, and Judith, and Tobias, and the Shepherd are not in the canon. The first book of Maccabees I have found to be Hebrew, the second is Greek, as can be proved from the very style. Although Jerome was once suspicious of the Apocrypha, it is said that he later viewed them as Scripture. For example, in Jerome's letter to Eustochium he quotes Sirach 13:2;[30] elsewhere Jerome also refers to Baruch, the Story of Susannah and Wisdom as scripture.[31][32][33] Jerome in the desert, tormented by his memories of the dancing girls, by Francisco de Zurbarán, 1639, Monastery of Santa María de Guadalupe Jerome's commentaries fall into three groups: His translations or recastings of Greek predecessors, including fourteen homilies on the Book of Jeremiah and the same number on the Book of Ezekiel by Origen (translated c. 380 in Constantinople); two homilies of Origen of Alexandria on the Song of Solomon (in Rome, c. 383); and thirty-nine on the Gospel of Luke (c. 389, in Bethlehem). The nine homilies of Origen on the Book of Isaiah included among his works were not done by him. Here should be mentioned, as an important contribution to the topography of Palestine, his book De situ et nominibus locorum Hebraeorum, a translation with additions and some regrettable omissions of the Onomasticon of Eusebius. To the same period (c. 390) belongs the Liber interpretationis nominum Hebraicorum, based on a work supposed to go back to Philo and expanded by Origen. Original commentaries on the Old Testament. To the period before his settlement at Bethlehem and the following five years belong a series of short, Old Testament studies: De seraphim, De voce Osanna, De tribus quaestionibus veteris legis (usually included among the letters as 18, 20, and 36); Quaestiones hebraicae in Genesim; Commentarius in Ecclesiasten; Tractatus septem in Psalmos 10–16 (lost); Explanationes in Michaeam, Sophoniam, Nahum, Habacuc, Aggaeum. After 395 he composed a series of longer commentaries, though in rather a desultory fashion: first on Jonah and Obadiah (396), then on Isaiah (c. 395 – c. 400), on Zechariah, Malachi, Hoseah, Joel, Amos (from 406), on the Book of Daniel (c. 407), on Ezekiel (between 410 and 415), and on Jeremiah (after 415, left unfinished). New Testament commentaries. These include only Philemon, Galatians, Ephesians, and Titus (hastily composed 387–388); Matthew (dictated in a fortnight, 398); Mark, selected passages in Luke, Revelation, and the prologue to the Gospel of John. Historical and hagiographic writings[edit] This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (August 2011) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) In the Middle Ages, Jerome was often ahistorically depicted as a cardinal. Jerome is also known as a historian. One of his earliest historical works was his Chronicon, composed c. 380 in Constantinople; this is a translation into Latin of the chronological tables which compose the second part of the Chronicon of Eusebius, with a supplement covering the period from 325 to 379. Despite numerous errors taken over from Eusebius, and some of his own, Jerome produced a valuable work, if only for the impulse which it gave to such later chroniclers as Prosper, Cassiodorus, and Victor of Tunnuna to continue his annals. Of considerable importance as well is the De viris illustribus, which was written at Bethlehem in 392, the title and arrangement of which are borrowed from Suetonius. It contains short biographical and literary notes on 135 Christian authors, from Saint Peter down to Jerome himself. For the first seventy-eight authors Eusebius (Historia ecclesiastica) is the main source; in the second section, beginning with Arnobius and Lactantius, he includes a good deal of independent information, especially as to Western writers. Four works of a hagiographic nature are: the Vita Pauli monachi, written during his first sojourn at Antioch (c. 376), the legendary material of which is derived from Egyptian monastic tradition; the Vitae Patrum (Vita Pauli primi eremitae), a biography of Saint Paul of Thebes; the Vita Malchi monachi captivi (c. 391), probably based on an earlier work, although it purports to be derived from the oral communications of the aged ascetic Malchus of Syria originally made to him in the desert of Chalcis; the Vita Hilarionis, of the same date, containing more trustworthy historical matter than the other two, and based partly on the biography of Epiphanius and partly on oral tradition. The so-called Martyrologium Hieronymianum is spurious; it was apparently composed by a Western monk toward the end of the 6th or beginning of the 7th century, with reference to an expression of Jerome's in the opening chapter of the Vita Malchi, where he speaks of intending to write a history of the saints and martyrs from the apostolic times. Description of vitamin A deficiency[edit] The following passage, taken from Saint Jerome's "Life of St. Hilarion" which was written about A.D. 392, appears to be the earliest account of the etiology, symptoms and cure of severe vitamin A deficiency:[34] From his thirty-first to his thirty-fifth year he had for food six ounces of barley bread, and vegetables slightly cooked without oil. But finding that his eyes were growing dim, and that his whole body was shrivelled with an eruption and a sort of stony roughness (impetigine et pumicea quad scabredine) he added oil to his former food, and up to the sixty-third year of his life followed this temperate course, tasting neither fruit nor pulse, nor anything whatsoever besides.[34] Letters[edit] Saint Jerome by Matthias Stom, 1635 Jerome's letters or epistles, both by the great variety of their subjects and by their qualities of style, form an important portion of his literary remains. Whether he is discussing problems of scholarship, or reasoning on cases of conscience, comforting the afflicted, or saying pleasant things to his friends, scourging the vices and corruptions of the time and against sexual immorality among the clergy,[35] exhorting to the ascetic life and renunciation of the world, or breaking a lance with his theological opponents, he gives a vivid picture not only of his own mind, but of the age and its peculiar characteristics. Because there was no distinct line between personal documents and those meant for publication, we frequently find in his letters both confidential messages and treatises meant for others besides the one to whom he was writing.[36] Due to the time he spent in Rome among wealthy families belonging to the Roman upper-class, Jerome was frequently commissioned by women who had taken a vow of virginity to write to them in guidance of how to live their life. As a result, he spent a great deal of his life corresponding with these women about certain abstentions and lifestyle practices.[7] These included the clothing she should wear, the interactions she should undertake and how to go about conducting herself during such interactions, and what and how she ate and drank. The letters most frequently reprinted or referred to are of a hortatory nature, such as Ep. 14, Ad Heliodorum de laude vitae solitariae; Ep. 22, Ad Eustochium de custodia virginitatis; Ep. 52, Ad Nepotianum de vita clericorum et monachorum, a sort of epitome of pastoral theology from the ascetic standpoint; Ep. 53, Ad Paulinum de studio scripturarum; Ep. 57, to the same, De institutione monachi; Ep. 70, Ad Magnum de scriptoribus ecclesiasticis; and Ep. 107, Ad Laetam de institutione filiae. Francesco St Jerome by Jacopo Palma il Giovane, c. 1595 Theological writings[edit] The Virgin and Child with Saints Jerome and Nicholas of Tolentino by Lorenzo Lotto, 1522 Practically all of Jerome's productions in the field of dogma have a more or less vehemently polemical character, and are directed against assailants of the orthodox doctrines. Even the translation of the treatise of Didymus the Blind on the Holy Spirit into Latin (begun in Rome 384, completed at Bethlehem) shows an apologetic tendency against the Arians and Pneumatomachoi. The same is true of his version of Origen's De principiis (c. 399), intended to supersede the inaccurate translation by Rufinus. The more strictly polemical writings cover every period of his life. During the sojourns at Antioch and Constantinople he was mainly occupied with the Arian controversy, and especially with the schisms centering around Meletius of Antioch and Lucifer Calaritanus. Two letters to Pope Damasus (15 and 16) complain of the conduct of both parties at Antioch, the Meletians and Paulinians, who had tried to draw him into their controversy over the application of the terms ousia and hypostasis to the Trinity. At the same time or a little later (379) he composed his Liber Contra Luciferianos, in which he cleverly uses the dialogue form to combat the tenets of that faction, particularly their rejection of baptism by heretics. In Rome (c. 383) Jerome wrote a passionate counterblast against the teaching of Helvidius, in defense of the doctrine of the perpetual virginity of Mary and of the superiority of the single over the married state. An opponent of a somewhat similar nature was Jovinianus, with whom he came into conflict in 392 (Adversus Jovinianum, Against Jovinianus) and the defense of this work addressed to his friend Pammachius, numbered 48 in the letters. Once more he defended the ordinary practices of piety and his own ascetic ethics in 406 against the Gallic presbyter Vigilantius, who opposed the cultus of martyrs and relics, the vow of poverty, and clerical celibacy. Meanwhile, the controversy with John II of Jerusalem and Rufinus concerning the orthodoxy of Origen occurred. To this period belong some of his most passionate and most comprehensive polemical works: the Contra Joannem Hierosolymitanum (398 or 399); the two closely connected Apologiae contra Rufinum (402); and the "last word" written a few months later, the Liber tertius seuten ultima responsio adversus scripta Rufini. The last of his polemical works is the skilfully composed Dialogus contra Pelagianos (415). Eschatology[edit] Jerome in his study, made by the Flemish drawer de Bry.[37] Jerome warned that those substituting false interpretations for the actual meaning of Scripture belonged to the "synagogue of the Antichrist".[38] "He that is not of Christ is of Antichrist," he wrote to Pope Damasus I.[39] He believed that "the mystery of iniquity" written about by Paul in 2 Thessalonians 2:7 was already in action when "every one chatters about his views."[40] To Jerome, the power restraining this mystery of iniquity was the Roman Empire, but as it fell this restraining force was removed. He warned a noble woman of Gaul: He that letteth is taken out of the way, and yet we do not realize that Antichrist is near. Yes, Antichrist is near whom the Lord Jesus Christ "shall consume with the spirit of his mouth." "Woe unto them," he cries, "that are with child, and to them that give suck in those days."... Savage tribes in countless numbers have overrun run all parts of Gaul. The whole country between the Alps and the Pyrenees, between the Rhine and the Ocean, has been laid waste by hordes of Quadi, Vandals, Sarmatians, Alans, Gepids, Herules, Saxons, Burgundians, Allemanni, and—alas! for the commonweal!—even Pannonians.[41] His Commentary on Daniel was expressly written to offset the criticisms of Porphyry,[42] who taught that Daniel related entirely to the time of Antiochus IV Epiphanes and was written by an unknown individual living in the second century BC. Against Porphyry, Jerome identified Rome as the fourth kingdom of chapters two and seven, but his view of chapters eight and 11 was more complex. Jerome held that chapter eight describes the activity of Antiochus Epiphanes, who is understood as a "type" of a future antichrist; 11:24 onwards applies primarily to a future antichrist but was partially fulfilled by Antiochus. Instead, he advocated that the "little horn" was the Antichrist: We should therefore concur with the traditional interpretation of all the commentators of the Christian Church, that at the end of the world, when the Roman Empire is to be destroyed, there shall be ten kings who will partition the Roman world amongst themselves. Then an insignificant eleventh king will arise, who will overcome three of the ten kings. ...After they have been slain, the seven other kings also will bow their necks to the victor.[43] In his Commentary on Daniel, he noted, "Let us not follow the opinion of some commentators and suppose him to be either the Devil or some demon, but rather, one of the human race, in whom Satan will wholly take up his residence in bodily form."[43] Instead of rebuilding the Jewish Temple to reign from, Jerome thought the Antichrist sat in God's Temple inasmuch as he made "himself out to be like God."[43] Jerome identified the four prophetic kingdoms symbolized in Daniel 2 as the Neo-Babylonian Empire, the Medes and Persians, Macedon, and Rome.[44] Jerome identified the stone cut out without hands as "namely, the Lord and Savior".[45] Jerome refuted Porphyry's application of the little horn of chapter seven to Antiochus. He expected that at the end of the world, Rome would be destroyed, and partitioned among ten kingdoms before the little horn appeared.[46] Jerome believed that Cyrus of Persia is the higher of the two horns of the Medo-Persian ram of Daniel 8:3.[43] The he-goat is Greece smiting Persia.[47] Alexander is the great horn, which is then succeeded by Alexander's half brother Philip and three of his generals. Reception by later Christianity[edit] Statue of Saint Jerome (Hieronymus) – Bethlehem, Palestine Authority, West Bank Jerome is the second most voluminous writer (after Augustine of Hippo) in ancient Latin Christianity. In the Catholic Church, he is recognized as the patron saint of translators, librarians and encyclopedists.[48] He acquired a knowledge of Hebrew by studying with a Jew who converted to Christianity. Against the traditional view at the time, he maintained that the Hebrew, not the Septuagint, was the inspired text of the Old Testament. Over a period of fifteen years at the request of Pope Damasus, he made a translation from the Hebrew into Latin that eventually superseded the preceding Latin translations and became known as the Vulgate. In the Council of Trent, it was declared authoritative "in public lectures, disputations, sermons and expositions".[49][50] Jerome showed more zeal and interest in the ascetic ideal than in abstract speculation. He lived as an ascetic for four or five years in the Syrian desert and later, for 34 years, near Bethlehem. Nevertheless, his writings show outstanding scholarship and his correspondence is historically of great importance.[51] It was Jerome's strict asceticism that made Martin Luther judge him so severely. In fact, Protestant readers are not generally inclined to accept his writings as authoritative. The tendency to recognize a superior comes out in his correspondence with Augustine (cf. Jerome's letters numbered 56, 67, 102–105, 110–112, 115–116; and 28, 39, 40, 67–68, 71–75, 81–82 in Augustine's).[citation needed] In art[edit] In art, Jerome is often represented as one of the four Latin doctors of the Church along with Augustine of Hippo, Ambrose, and Pope Gregory I. As a prominent member of the Roman clergy, he has often been portrayed anachronistically in the garb of a cardinal. Even when he is depicted as a half-clad anchorite, with cross, skull and Bible for the only furniture of his cell, the red hat or some other indication of his rank as cardinal is as a rule introduced somewhere in the picture. During Jerome's life, cardinals did not exist. However, by the time of the Renaissance and the Baroque it was common practice for a secretary to the pope to be a cardinal (as Jerome had effectively been to Damasus), and so this was reflected in artistic interpretations. Jerome is also often depicted with a lion, in reference to the popular hagiographical belief that Jerome had tamed a lion in the wilderness by healing its paw. The source for the story may actually have been the second century Roman tale of Androcles, or confusion with the exploits of Saint Gerasimus (Jerome in later Latin is "Geronimus").[52][53][54] Hagiographies of Jerome talk of his having spent many years in the Syrian desert, and artists often depict him in a "wilderness", which for West European painters can take the form of a wood.[55] From the late Middle Ages, depictions of Jerome in a wider setting became popular. He is either shown in his study, surrounded by books and the equipment of a scholar, or in a rocky desert, or in a setting that combines both themes, with him studying a book under the shelter of a rock-face or cave mouth. His attribute of the lion, often shown at a smaller scale, may be beside him in either setting. Jerome is often depicted in connection with the vanitas motif, the reflection on the meaninglessness of earthly life and the transient nature of all earthly goods and pursuits. In the 16th century Saint Jerome in his study by Pieter Coecke van Aelst and workshop, the saint is depicted with a skull. Behind him on the wall is pinned an admonition, Cogita Mori ("Think upon death"). Further reminders of the vanitas motif of the passage of time and the imminence of death are the image of the Last Judgment visible in the saint's Bible, the candle and the hourglass.[56] Jerome is also sometimes depicted with an owl, the symbol of wisdom and scholarship.[57] Writing materials and the trumpet of final judgment are also part of his iconography.[57] He is commemorated on 30 September with a memorial. Saint Jerome in his study, c. 1530 by Pieter Coecke van Aelst and Workshop, Walters Art Museum Saint Jerome and the Paulines painted by Gabriel Thaller in the St. Jerome Church in Štrigova, Međimurje County, northern Croatia (18th century) Saint Jerome by Simon Vouet c. 1620 Saint Jerome c. 1520 Netherlandish stained glass window at MET. See also[edit] Saints portal Christianity portal Bible translations Church Fathers Ferdinand Cavallera Genesius of Arles International Translation Day Letter of Jerome to Pope Damasus Order of St. Jerome Saint Jerome, patron saint archive References[edit] ^ The Encyclopedia of Christian Literature, Volume 2. Scarecrow Press. 2010. ISBN 9780810872837. Jerome ("Hieronymus" in Latin), was born into a Christian family in Stridon, modern-day Strigova in northern Croatia. ^ "St. Jerome (Christian scholar)". Britannica Encyclopedia. 2 February 2017. Archived from the original on 24 March 2017. Retrieved 23 March 2017. ^ Scheck, Thomas P. (December 2008). Commentary on Matthew (The Fathers of the Church, Volume 117). p. 5. ISBN 9780813201177. Archived from the original on 5 February 2016. Retrieved 3 June 2015. "" ^ Maisie Ward, Saint Jerome, Sheed & Ward, London 1950, p. 7 "It may be taken as certain that Jerome was an Italian, coming from that wedge of Italy which seems on the old maps to be driven between Dalmatia and Pannonia." ^ Tom Streeter, The Church and Western Culture: An Introduction to Church History, AuthorHouse 2006, p. 102 "Jerome was born around 340 AD at Stridon, a town in northeast Italy at the head of the Adriatic Ocean." ^ Schaff, Philip, ed. (1893). A Select Library of Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church. 2nd series. VI. Henry Wace. New York: The Christian Literature Company. Archived from the original on 11 July 2014. Retrieved 7 June 2010. ^ a b c Megan Hale Williams, The Monk and the Book: Jerome and the Making of Christian Scholarship, (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2006) ^ In the Eastern Orthodox Church he is known as Saint Jerome of Stridonium or Blessed Jerome. Though "Blessed" in this context does not have the sense of being less than a saint, as in the West. ^ Williams, Megan Hale (2006), The Monk and the Book: Jerome and the making of Christian Scholarship, Chicago ^ Pevarello, Daniele (2013). The Sentences of Sextus and the origins of Christian ascetiscism. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. p. 1. ISBN 978-3-16-152579-7. Archived from the original on 5 February 2016. Retrieved 11 December 2015. ^ Walsh, Michael, ed. (1992), Butler's Lives of the Saints, New York: HarperCollins, p. 307 ^ Kelly, JND (1975), Jerome: His Life, Writings, and Controversies, New York: Harper & Row, pp. 13–14 ^ Payne, Robert (1951), The Fathers of the Western Church, New York: Viking Press, pp. 90–92 ^ Psalm 55:15 ^ Jerome, Commentarius in Ezzechielem, c. 40, v. 5 ^ Patrologia Latina 25, 373: Crebroque cryptas ingredi, quae in terrarum profunda defossae, ex utraque parte ingredientium per parietes habent corpora sepultorum, et ita obscura sunt omnia, ut propemodum illud propheticum compleatur: Descendant ad infernum viventes (Ps. LIV,16): et raro desuper lumen admissum, horrorem temperet tenebrarum, ut non-tam fenestram, quam foramen demissi luminis putes: rursumque pedetentim acceditur, et caeca nocte circumdatis illud Virgilianum proponitur (Aeneid. lib. II): "Horror ubique animos, simul ipsa silentia terrent." ^ P. Vergilius Maro, Aeneid Theodore C. Williams, Ed. Perseus Project Archived 11 November 2013 at the Wayback Machine (retrieved 23 August 2013) ^ Payne, Robert (1951), The Fathers of the Western Church, New York: Viking, p. 91 ^ Rebenich, Stefan (2002), Jerome, p. 211, Further, he began to study Hebrew: 'I betook myself to a brother who before his conversion had been a Hebrew and...' ^ Pritz, Ray (1988), Nazarene Jewish Christianity: from the end of the New Testament, p. 50, In his accounts of his desert sojourn, Jerome never mentions leaving Chalcis, and there is no pressing reason to think... ^ "Saint Jerome in His Study". The Walters Art Museum. Archived from the original on 16 May 2013. Retrieved 18 September 2012. ^ Joyce E. Salisbury, Encyclopedia of women in the ancient world, Blaesilla ^ Bennett, Rod (2015). The Apostasy That Wasn't: The Extraordinary Story of the Unbreakable Early Church. Catholic Answers Press. ISBN 978-1-941663-49-3. ^ "(...) die griechische Bibelübersetzung, die einem innerjüdischen Bedürfnis entsprang (...) [von den] Rabbinen zuerst gerühmt (...) Später jedoch, als manche ungenaue Übertragung des hebräischen Textes in der Septuaginta und Übersetzungsfehler die Grundlage für hellenistische Irrlehren abgaben, lehte man die Septuaginta ab." Verband der Deutschen Juden (Hrsg.), neu hrsg. von Walter Homolka, Walter Jacob, Tovia Ben Chorin: Die Lehren des Judentums nach den Quellen; München, Knesebeck, 1999, Bd.3, S. 43ff ^ Pierre Nautin, article Hieronymus, in: Theologische Realenzyklopädie, Vol. 15, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin-New York 1986, p. 304-315, here p. 309-310. ^ Michael Graves, Jerome's Hebrew Philology: A Study Based on his Commentary on Jeremiah, Brill, 2007: 196–198. Page 197: "In his discussion he gives clear evidence of having consulted the Hebrew himself, providing details about the Hebrew that could not have been learned from the Greek translations." ^ "The Bible". Archived from the original on 13 January 2016. Retrieved 14 December 2015. ^ Edgecomb, Kevin P., Jerome's Prologue to Jeremiah, archived from the original on 31 December 2013, retrieved 14 December 2015 ^ "Jerome's Preface to Samuel and Kings". Archived from the original on 2 December 2015. Retrieved 14 December 2015. ^ Barber, Michael (6 March 2006). "Loose Canons: The Development of the Old Testament (Part 2)". Archived from the original on 7 December 2009. Retrieved 1 August 2007. ^ Jerome, To Paulinus, Epistle 58 (A.D. 395), in NPNF2, VI:119.: "Do not, my dearest brother, estimate my worth by the number of my years. Gray hairs are not wisdom; it is wisdom which is as good as gray hairs at least that is what Solomon says: 'wisdom is the gray hair unto men' [Wisdom 4:9]. Moses too in choosing the seventy elders is told to take those whom he knows to be elders indeed, and to select them not for their years but for their discretion [Num. 11:16]? And, as a boy, Daniel judges old men and in the flower of youth condemns the incontinence of age [Daniel 13:55–59 aka Story of Susannah 55–59]." ^ Jerome, To Oceanus, Epistle 77:4 (A.D. 399), in NPNF2, VI:159.:"I would cite the words of the psalmist: 'the sacrifices of God are a broken spirit,’ [Ps 51:17] and those of Ezekiel 'I prefer the repentance of a sinner rather than his death,’ [Ez 18:23] and those of Baruch, 'Arise, arise, O Jerusalem,’ [Baruch 5:5] and many other proclamations made by the trumpets of the Prophets." ^ Jerome, Letter 51, 6, 7, NPNF2, VI:87-8: "For in the book of Wisdom, which is inscribed with his name, Solomon says: 'God created man to be immortal and made him be an image of his own eternity.'[Wisdom 2:23]...Instead of the three proofs from Holy Scripture which you said would satisfy you if I could produce them, behold I have given you seven" ^ a b Taylor, F. Sherwood (23 December 1944). "St. Jerome and Vitamin A". Nature. 154 (3921): 802. Bibcode:1944Natur.154Q.802T. doi:10.1038/154802a0. S2CID 4097517. ^ "regulae sancti pachomii 84 rule 104. ^ W. H. Fremantle, "Prolegomena to Jerome", V. ^ "Hiëronymus in zijn studeervertrek". lib.ugent.be. Retrieved 2 October 2020. ^ See Jerome's The Dialogue against the Luciferians Archived 1 January 2014 at the Wayback Machine, p.334 in A Select Library of Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church : St. Jerome: Letters and select works, 1893. Second Series By Philip Schaff, Henry Wace. ^ See Jerome's Letter to Pope Damasus Archived 13 March 2017 at the Wayback Machine, p.19 in A Select Library of Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church : St. Jerome: Letters and select works, 1893. Second Series By Philip Schaff, Henry Wace. ^ See Jerome's Against the Pelagians, Book I Archived 1 January 2014 at the Wayback Machine, p.449 in A Select Library of Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church : St. Jerome: Letters and select works, 1893. Second Series By Philip Schaff, Henry Wace. ^ See Jerome's Letter to Ageruchia Archived 2014-01-01 at the Wayback Machine, p.236-7 in A Select Library of Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church : St. Jerome: Letters and select works, 1893. Second Series By Philip Schaff, Henry Wace. ^ Eremantle, note on Jerome's commentary on Daniel, in NPAF, 2d series, Vol. 6, p. 500. ^ a b c d "Jerome, Commentario in Danielem". Archived from the original on 26 May 2010. Retrieved 6 May 2008. ^ "Jerome, Commentaria in Danelem, chap. 2, verses 31–40". Archived from the original on 26 May 2010. Retrieved 6 May 2008. ^ "Jerome, Commentaria in Danieluem, chap. 2, verse 40". Archived from the original on 26 May 2010. Retrieved 6 May 2008. ^ "Jerome, Commentario in Danielem, chap. 7, verse 8". Archived from the original on 26 May 2010. Retrieved 6 May 2008. ^ "Jerome, Commentaria in Danielem, chap. 8, verse 5". Archived from the original on 26 May 2010. Retrieved 6 May 2008. ^ "St. Jerome: Patron Saint of Librarians | Luther College Library and Information Services". Lis.luther.edu. Archived from the original on 4 July 2013. Retrieved 2 June 2014. ^ Jimmy Akin, "Is the Vulgate the Catholic Church’s Official Bible?" in National Catholic Register ^ The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church. Oxford University Press; 2005. ISBN 978-0-19-280290-3. Vulgate. p. 1722–1723. ^ The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church. Oxford University Press; 2005. ISBN 978-0-19-280290-3. Jerome. p. 872–873. ^ Hope Werness, Continuum encyclopaedia of animal symbolism in art, 2006 ^ "Eugene Rice has suggested that in all probability the story of Gerasimus's lion became attached to the figure of Jerome some time during the seventh century, after the military invasions of the Arabs had forced many Greek monks who were living in the deserts of the Middle East to seek refuge in Rome. Rice conjectures (Saint Jerome in the Renaissance, pp. 44–45) that because of the similarity between the names Gerasimus and Geronimus – the late Latin form of Jerome's name – 'a Latin-speaking cleric . . . made St Geronimus the hero of a story he had heard about St Gerasimus; and that the author of Plerosque nimirum, attracted by a story at once so picturesque, so apparently appropriate, and so resonant in suggestion and meaning, and under the impression that its source was pilgrims who had been told it in Bethlehem, included it in his life of a favourite saint otherwise bereft of miracles.'" Salter, David (2001). Holy and Noble Beasts: Encounters With Animals in Medieval Literature. D. S. Brewer. p. 12. ISBN 978-0-85991-624-0. Archived from the original on 5 February 2016. Retrieved 27 December 2015. ^ "a figment" found in the thirteenth-century Golden Legend by Jacobus de Voragine Williams, Megan Hale (2006). The Monk and the Book: Jerome and the Making of Christian Scholarship. Chicago: U of Chicago P. p. 1. ISBN 978-0-226-89900-8. ^ "Saint Jerome in Catholic Saint info". Catholic-saints.info. Archived from the original on 29 April 2014. Retrieved 2 June 2014. ^ "Saint Jerome in His Study". The Walters Art Museum. Archived from the original on 18 September 2012. Retrieved 6 September 2012. ^ a b The Collection: Saint Jerome Archived 22 October 2012 at the Wayback Machine, gallery of the religious art collection of New Mexico State University, with explanations. Retrieved 10 August 2007. Bibliography[edit] Andrew Cain and Josef Lössl, Jerome of Stridon: His Life, Writings and Legacy (London and New York, 2009) J. N. D. Kelly, Jerome: His Life, Writings, and Controversies (Peabody, MA 1998) S. Rebenich, Jerome (London and New York, 2002) Megan Hale Williams. The Monk and the Book: Jerome and the Making of Christian Scholarship (Chicago and London, 2008) Biblia Sacra Vulgata [e.g. edition published Stuttgart, 1994, ISBN 3-438-05303-9] Attribution This article uses material from the Schaff–Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge. Further reading[edit] Saint Jerome, Three biographies: Malchus, St. Hilarion and Paulus the First Hermit Authored by Saint Jerome, London, 2012. limovia.net. ISBN 978-1-78336-016-1 External links[edit] Wikiquote has quotations related to: Jerome Wikimedia Commons has media related to Saint Jerome. Latin Wikisource has original text related to this article: Biblia Sacra Letters of Jerome Dataset – corpus as structured data, with sender, receiver, and letter-type classification St. Jerome (pdf) from Fr. Alban Butler's Lives of the Saints The Life of St. Jerome, Priest, Confessor and Doctor of the Church Herbermann, Charles, ed. (1913). "St. Jerome" . Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. Jewish Encyclopedia: Jerome St. Jerome – Catholic Online St Jerome (Hieronymus) of Stridonium Orthodox synaxarion Further reading of depictions of Saint Jerome in art Saint Jerome, Doctor of the Church at the Christian Iconography web site Here Followeth the Life of Jerome from Caxton's translation of the Golden Legend Works of Saint Jerome at Somni Beati Hyeronimi Epistolarum liber, digitized codex (1464) Epistole de santo Geronimo traducte di latino, digitized codex (1475–1490) Hieronymi in Danielem, digitized codex (1490) Sancti Hieronymi ad Pammachium in duodecim prophetas, digitized codex (1470–1480) Colonnade Statue in St Peter's Square Latin texts[edit] Chronological list of Jerome's Works with modern editions and translations cited Opera Omnia (Complete Works) from Migne edition (Patrologia Latina, 1844–1855) with analytical indexes, almost complete online edition Lewis E 82 Vitae patrum (Lives of the Fathers) at OPenn Lewis E 47 Bible Commentary at OPenn Facsimiles[edit] Migne volume 23 part 1 (1883 edition) Migne volume 23 part 2 (1883 edition) Migne volume 24 (1845 edition) Migne volume 25 part 1 (1884 edition) Migne volume 25 part 2 (1884 edition) Migne volume 28 (1890 edition?) Migne volume 30 (1865 edition) English translations[edit] Jerome (1887). The pilgrimage of the holy Paula. Palestine Pilgrims' Text Society. English translations of Biblical Prefaces, Commentary on Daniel, Chronicle, and Letter 120 (tertullian.org) Jerome's Letter to Pope Damasus: Preface to the Gospels English translation of Jerome's De Viris Illustribus Translations of various works (letters, biblical prefaces, life of St. Hilarion, others) (under "Jerome") Lives of Famous Men (CCEL) Apology Against Rufinus (CCEL) Letters, The Life of Paulus the First Hermit, The Life of S. Hilarion, The Life of Malchus, the Captive Monk, The Dialogue Against the Luciferians, The Perpetual Virginity of Blessed Mary, Against Jovinianus, Against Vigilantius, To Pammachius against John of Jerusalem, Against the Pelagians, Prefaces (CCEL) Audiobook of some of the letters v t e History of Christianity Centuries 1st • 2nd • 3rd • 4th • 5th • 6th • 7th • 8th • 9th • 10th • 11th • 12th • 13th • 14th • 15th • 16th • 17th • 18th • 19th • 20th • 21st Origins and Apostolic Age Background Jesus Baptism Ministry Crucifixion Resurrection Great Commission Holy Spirit Apostles Jewish Christians Paul the Apostle Council of Jerusalem Split with Judaism New Testament Gospels Acts Pauline epistles General epistles Revelation Ante-Nicene period Diversity Adoptionism Arianism Docetism Donatism Gnosticism Marcionism Montanism Canon development Persecution Church / Apostolic Fathers Pope Clement I Polycarp Ignatius Irenaeus Justin Martyr Tertullian Origen Late antiquity (Great Church) Constantine Constantinian shift Monasticism Councils Nicaea I Nicene Creed Athanasius Jerome Augustine Constantinople I Ephesus I Chalcedon Biblical canon Catholicism Eastern Orthodoxy Church of the East Oriental Orthodoxy Chrysostom Nestorianism Icons Iconoclasm Great Schism Fall of Constantinople Armenia Georgia Greece Egypt Syria Ethiopia Bulgaria Ottoman Empire Russia America Eastern Christianity Papacy Development of primacy Eastern Orthodox opposition Lateran IV Art patronage of Julius II Leo X Counter-Reformation Trent Art Catholic Reformation Jesuits Xavier Thomas More Monastery dissolution Wars Mass rocks and priest holes Guadalupe Jansenists Molinists Neo-Scholasticism Teresa Modernism Independent Catholics Vatican I and Vatican II Ecclesial community Timeline Middle Ages Pelagianism Gregory I Celtic Germanic Scandinavian Kievan Rus' Investiture Anselm Abelard Bernard Bogomils Bosnian Cathars Apostolic Brethren Dulcinian Crusades Waldensians Inquisition Early Scholasticism Christian mysticism Dominic Francis Bonaventure Aquinas Five Ways Wycliffe Avignon Papal Schism Bohemian Reformation Hus Conciliarism Synods Reformation and Protestantism Erasmus Eucharist Calvinist–Arminian debate Arminianism Wars Resistance theories Separation of church and state Nicodemites Hymnody of continental Europe Formal and material principles Literature Protestant work ethic Lutheranism Luther 95 Theses Diet of Worms Theology Bible Melanchthon Book of Concord Orthodoxy Scholasticism Eucharist Art Calvinism Zwingli Calvin Huguenots Presbyterianism Scotland Knox TULIP Baptism Law and Gospel Dort Three Forms of Unity Westminster Scholasticism Metrical psalters Anglicanism Timeline Henry VIII Cranmer Elizabethan 39 Articles Puritans Civil War Church music Book of Common Prayer King James Version Anabaptism Theology Radical Reformation Grebel Swiss Brethren Müntzer Martyrs' Synod Menno Simons Smyth Martyrs Mirror Ausbund 1640–1789 Revivalism Missionaries Baptists Separation of church and state Edicts of toleration Congregationalism First Great Awakening Methodism Millerism Pietism Fostering of early experimental science Neo- and Old Lutherans 1789–present Camp meeting Holiness movement Second Great Awakening Restorationists Jehovah's Witnesses Mormonism Seventh-day Adventist Adventism Oxford Movement Laestadianism Finnish Awakening Christian existentialism Third Great Awakening Azusa Revival Gospel music Fundamentalist–Modernist controversy Pacifism Ecumenism Five solae Jesus movement Pentecostalism Charismatics Liberation theology Reformed epistemology Fourth Great Awakening Evangelical and Mainline Protestants Christian right and left Rise of the Evangelical Church in Latin America Persecution by ISIL Timeline Missions Martyrs Theology Eastern Orthodoxy Oriental Orthodoxy Protestantism Catholicism Links to related articles v t e History of Catholic theology Key figures General History of the Catholic Church Timeline History of the papacy Papal primacy Ecumenical councils Catholic Bible Vulgate Biblical canon History of Christian theology Early Church Paul Clement of Rome First Epistle of Clement Didache Ignatius of Antioch Polycarp Epistle of Barnabas The Shepherd of Hermas Aristides of Athens Justin Martyr Epistle to Diognetus Irenaeus Montanism Tertullian Origen Antipope Novatian Cyprian Constantine to Pope Gregory I Eusebius Athanasius of Alexandria Arianism Pelagianism Nestorianism Monophysitism Ephrem the Syrian Hilary of Poitiers Cyril of Jerusalem Basil of Caesarea Gregory of Nazianzus Gregory of Nyssa Ambrose John Chrysostom Jerome Augustine of Hippo John Cassian Orosius Cyril of Alexandria Peter Chrysologus Pope Leo I Boethius Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite Pope Gregory I Early Middle Ages Isidore of Seville John Climacus Maximus the Confessor Monothelitism Ecthesis Bede John of Damascus Iconoclasm Transubstantiation dispute Predestination disputes Paulinus II of Aquileia Alcuin Benedict of Aniane Rabanus Maurus Paschasius Radbertus John Scotus Eriugena High Middle Ages Roscellinus Gregory of Narek Berengar of Tours Peter Damian Anselm of Canterbury Joachim of Fiore Peter Abelard Decretum Gratiani Bernard of Clairvaux Peter Lombard Anselm of Laon Hildegard of Bingen Hugh of Saint Victor Dominic de Guzmán Robert Grosseteste Francis of Assisi Anthony of Padua Beatrice of Nazareth Bonaventure Albertus Magnus Boetius of Dacia Henry of Ghent Thomas Aquinas Siger of Brabant Thomism Roger Bacon Mysticism and reforms Ramon Llull Duns Scotus Dante Alighieri William of Ockham Richard Rolle John of Ruusbroec Catherine of Siena Bridget of Sweden Meister Eckhart Johannes Tauler Walter Hilton The Cloud of Unknowing Heinrich Seuse Geert Groote Devotio Moderna Julian of Norwich Thomas à Kempis Nicholas of Cusa Marsilio Ficino Girolamo Savonarola Giovanni Pico della Mirandola Reformation Counter-Reformation Erasmus Thomas Cajetan Thomas More John Fisher Johann Eck Francisco de Vitoria Thomas of Villanova Ignatius of Loyola Francisco de Osuna John of Ávila Francis Xavier Teresa of Ávila Luis de León John of the Cross Peter Canisius Luis de Molina (Molinism) Robert Bellarmine Francisco Suárez Lawrence of Brindisi Francis de Sales Baroque period to French Revolution Tommaso Campanella Pierre de Bérulle Pierre Gassendi René Descartes Mary of Jesus of Ágreda António Vieira Jean-Jacques Olier Louis Thomassin Jacques-Bénigne Bossuet François Fénelon Cornelius Jansen (Jansenism) Blaise Pascal Nicolas Malebranche Giambattista Vico Alphonsus Liguori Louis de Montfort Maria Gaetana Agnesi Alfonso Muzzarelli Johann Michael Sailer Clement Mary Hofbauer Bruno Lanteri 19th century Joseph Görres Felicité de Lamennais Luigi Taparelli Antonio Rosmini Ignaz von Döllinger John Henry Newman Henri Lacordaire Jaime Balmes Gaetano Sanseverino Giovanni Maria Cornoldi Wilhelm Emmanuel Freiherr von Ketteler Giuseppe Pecci Joseph Hergenröther Tommaso Maria Zigliara Matthias Joseph Scheeben Émile Boutroux Modernism Neo-Scholasticism Léon Bloy Désiré-Joseph Mercier Friedrich von Hügel Vladimir Solovyov Marie-Joseph Lagrange George Tyrrell Maurice Blondel Thérèse of Lisieux 20th century G. K. Chesterton Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange Joseph Maréchal Pierre Teilhard de Chardin Jacques Maritain Étienne Gilson Ronald Knox Dietrich von Hildebrand Gabriel Marcel Marie-Dominique Chenu Romano Guardini Edith Stein Fulton Sheen Henri de Lubac Daniel-Rops Jean Guitton Josemaría Escrivá Nouvelle théologie Karl Rahner Yves Congar Bernard Lonergan Emmanuel Mounier Jean Daniélou Hans Urs von Balthasar Alfred Delp Thomas Merton René Girard Johann Baptist Metz Jean Vanier Henri Nouwen 21st century Carlo Maria Martini Pope Benedict XVI Walter Kasper Raniero Cantalamessa Michał Heller Peter Kreeft Jean-Luc Marion Tomáš Halík Scott Hahn  Catholicism portal v t e Saints of the Catholic Church Stages of canonization: Servant of God   →   Venerable   →   Blessed   →   Saint Virgin Mary Mother of God (Theotokos) Immaculate Conception Perpetual virginity Assumption Marian apparition Titles of Mary Joseph (husband) Apostles Andrew Barnabas Bartholomew James of Alphaeus James the Great John Jude Matthew Matthias Paul Peter Philip Simon Thomas Archangels Gabriel Michael Raphael Confessors Anatolius Anthony of Kiev Athanasius the Confessor Chariton the Confessor Dominic Edward the Confessor Francis of Assisi Francis Borgia Louis Bertrand Maximus the Confessor Michael of Synnada Paphnutius the Confessor Paul I of Constantinople Peter Claver Salonius Seraphim of Sarov Theophanes the Confessor Disciples Apollos Mary Magdalene Priscilla and Aquila Silvanus Stephen Timothy Titus Seventy disciples Doctors Gregory the Great Ambrose Augustine of Hippo Jerome John Chrysostom Basil of Caesarea Gregory of Nazianzus Athanasius of Alexandria Cyril of Alexandria Cyril of Jerusalem John of Damascus Bede the Venerable Ephrem the Syrian Thomas Aquinas Bonaventure Anselm of Canterbury Isidore of Seville Peter Chrysologus Leo the Great Peter Damian Bernard of Clairvaux Hilary of Poitiers Alphonsus Liguori Francis de Sales Peter Canisius John of the Cross Robert Bellarmine Albertus Magnus Anthony of Padua Lawrence of Brindisi Teresa of Ávila Catherine of Siena Thérèse of Lisieux John of Ávila Hildegard of Bingen Gregory of Narek Evangelists Matthew Mark Luke John Church Fathers Alexander of Alexandria Alexander of Jerusalem Ambrose of Milan Anatolius Athanasius of Alexandria Augustine of Hippo Caesarius of Arles Caius Cappadocian Fathers Clement of Alexandria Clement of Rome Cyprian of Carthage Cyril of Alexandria Cyril of Jerusalem Damasus I Desert Fathers Desert Mothers Dionysius of Alexandria Dionysius of Corinth Dionysius Ephrem the Syrian Epiphanius of Salamis Fulgentius of Ruspe Gregory the Great Gregory of Nazianzus Gregory of Nyssa Hilary of Poitiers Hippolytus of Rome Ignatius of Antioch Irenaeus of Lyons Isidore of Seville Jerome of Stridonium John Chrysostom John of Damascus Maximus the Confessor Melito of Sardis Quadratus of Athens Papias of Hierapolis Peter Chrysologus Polycarp of Smyrna Theophilus of Antioch Victorinus of Pettau Vincent of Lérins Zephyrinus Martyrs Canadian Martyrs Carthusian Martyrs Child Martyrs of Tlaxcala Christina of Persia Dismas the Good Thief Forty Martyrs of England and Wales Four Crowned Martyrs Gerard of Csanád Great Martyr The Holy Innocents Irish Martyrs Joan of Arc John Fisher Korean Martyrs Lorenzo Ruiz Lübeck martyrs Luigi Versiglia Martyrology Martyrs of Albania Martyrs of China Martyrs of Japan Martyrs of Laos Martyrs of Natal Martyrs of Otranto Martyrs of the Spanish Civil War Maximilian Kolbe Óscar Romero Pedro Calungsod Perpetua and Felicity Peter Chanel Pietro Parenzo Philomena Saints of the Cristero War Stephen Teresa Benedicta of the Cross Thomas Becket Thomas More Three Martyrs of Chimbote Uganda Martyrs Vietnamese Martyrs Valentine of Rome Victor and Corona Missionaries Augustine of Canterbury Boniface Damien of Molokai Francis Xavier François de Laval Gregory the Illuminator Junípero Serra Nico of Georgia Patrick of Ireland Remigius Patriarchs Adam Abel Abraham Isaac Jacob Joseph Joseph (father of Jesus) David Noah Solomon Matriarchs Popes Adeodatus I Adeodatus II Adrian III Agapetus I Agatho Alexander I Anacletus Anastasius I Anicetus Anterus Benedict II Boniface I Boniface IV Caius Callixtus I Celestine I Celestine V Clement I Cornelius Damasus I Dionysius Eleuterus Eugene I Eusebius Eutychian Evaristus Fabian Felix I Felix III Felix IV Gelasius I Gregory I Gregory II Gregory III Gregory VII Hilarius Hormisdas Hyginus Innocent I John I John XXIII John Paul II Julius I Leo I Leo II Leo III Leo IV Leo IX Linus Lucius I Marcellinus Marcellus I Mark Martin I Miltiades Nicholas I Paschal I Paul I Paul VI Peter Pius I Pius V Pius X Pontian Sergius I Silverius Simplicius Siricius Sixtus I Sixtus II Sixtus III Soter Stephen I Stephen IV Sylvester I Symmachus Telesphorus Urban I Victor I Vitalian Zachary Zephyrinus Zosimus Prophets Agabus Amos Anna Baruch ben Neriah David Dalua Elijah Ezekiel Habakkuk Haggai Hosea Isaiah Jeremiah Job Joel John the Baptist Jonah Judas Barsabbas Malachi Melchizedek Micah Moses Nahum Obadiah Samuel Seven Maccabees and their mother Simeon Zechariah (prophet) Zechariah (NT) Zephaniah Virgins Agatha of Sicily Agnes of Rome Angela of the Cross Æthelthryth Bernadette Soubirous Brigid of Kildare Catherine Labouré Catherine of Siena Cecilia Clare of Assisi Eulalia of Mérida Euphemia Faustina Kowalska Genevieve Kateri Tekakwitha Lucy of Syracuse Maria Goretti Teresa of Calcutta Narcisa de Jesús Rose of Lima See also Calendar of saints Fourteen Holy Helpers Military saints Athleta Christi Miles Christianus Church Militant Virtuous pagan  Catholic Church portal  Saints portal v t e Latin Church Latin Church, also known as the 'Western Church', the largest particular church sui iuris of the Catholic Church, and the original and still major part of Western Christianity Patriarchates (by order of precedence) Current Rome ('Patriarch of the West'): Pope Francis (with cathedra in Archbasilica of Saint John Lateran) Jerusalem: Pierbattista Pizzaballa East Indies: Filipe Neri Ferrão Lisbon: Manuel Clemente Venice: Francesco Moraglia Defunct Carthage (?−1964) Alexandria (1276–1964) Antioch (1098–1964) Constantinople (1204–1964) West Indies (1524–1963) Aquileia (560–1751) Ethiopia (1555–1663) Grado (560–1451) History Apostolic sees Rome Peter Paul Syracuse Peter Malta Paul Milan Barnabas Santiago de Compostela James Church Fathers Tertullian Cyprian Hilary of Poitiers Ambrose* Pope Damasus I Jerome* Augustine of Hippo* Pope Gregory I* Isidore of Seville Apostolic succession History of the papacy Papal primacy Historical development First Martyrs Great Church Early African church Vulgate East–West Schism Scholasticism Crusades Northern States Military orders Western Schism Age of Discovery Humanism Protestant Reformation Council of Trent Counter-Reformation Vatican I Vatican II 1983 Code of Canon Law Liturgical language Ecclesiastical Latin Liturgical rites Liturgical days (Latin Mass) Current Ambrosian Rite Rite of Braga Mozarabic Rite Roman Rite Mass of Paul VI (Ordinary form) Tridentine Mass Extraordinary form Anglican Use Zaire Use Orders Benedictine Rite Carmelite Rite Carthusian Rite Cistercian Rite Dominican Rite Norbertine Rite Defunct African Rite Aquileian Rite British Celtic Rite Durham Rite Hereford Use Sarum Use York Use Gallican Rite Missa Nautica Missa sicca Missa Venatoria Pre-Tridentine Mass See also Latin cross Latin Church in the Middle East Latins Turkey Titular sees Eastern Catholic Churches Conference of the Latin Bishops of the Arab Regions * also Great Doctors Category v t e History of the Catholic Church General History of the Catholic Church By country or region Ecclesiastical history Timeline Papacy Papal primacy Catholic ecumenical councils First seven Catholic Bible Biblical canon Vulgate History of the Roman Curia Religious institutes Christian monasticism Catholic culture Art Role in civilization Papal States Latin Church Eastern Catholic Churches Early Church (30–325/476) Origins and Apostolic Age (30–100) Jesus Ministry Crucifixion Resurrection Great Commission Holy Spirit Mary John the Baptist Apostles Commissioning Peter John Paul Stephen Council of Jerusalem Split with Judaism New Testament Background Gospels Acts Pauline epistles General epistles Revelation Ante-Nicene period (100–325) Persecution Church Fathers Apostolic Fathers Pope Clement I Polycarp Ignatius Irenaeus Justin Martyr Canon Tertullian Origen Late antiquity (313–476) Great Church (180–451) Roman state church (380-451) Constantine the Great Christianity Arian controversy Archbasilica of Saint John Lateran Old St. Peter's Basilica First Council of Nicaea Pope Sylvester I First Council of Constantinople Biblical canon Jerome Vulgate Council of Ephesus Council of Chalcedon Early Middle Ages Benedict of Nursia Monasticism Second Council of Constantinople Pope Gregory I Gregorian chant Islamic conquests Third Council of Constantinople Saint Boniface Byzantine Iconoclasm Second Council of Nicaea Charlemagne Pope Leo III Fourth Council of Constantinople East–West Schism High Middle Ages Pope Urban II Investiture Controversy Crusades Northern States Military orders Universities Scholasticism First Council of the Lateran Second Council of the Lateran Third Council of the Lateran Pope Innocent III Latin Empire Francis of Assisi Fourth Council of the Lateran Inquisition First Council of Lyon Second Council of Lyon Bernard of Clairvaux Late Middle Ages Thomas Aquinas Pope Boniface VIII Western Schism Avignon Papacy Pope Clement V Council of Vienne Knights Templar Catherine of Siena Pope Alexander VI Age of Discovery Reformation Catholic Reformation Reformation Catholic Reformation Thomas More Pope Leo X Society of Jesus Ignatius of Loyola Francis Xavier Dissolution of the Monasteries Council of Trent Pope Pius V Tridentine Mass Teresa of Ávila John of the Cross Peter Canisius Philip Neri Robert Bellarmine Thirty Years' War Baroque Period to the French Revolution Pope Innocent XI Pope Benedict XIV Suppression of the Society of Jesus Age of Enlightenment Anti-clericalism Pope Pius VI Shimabara Rebellion Edict of Nantes Dechristianization of France during the French Revolution 19th century Pope Pius VII Pope Pius IX Dogma of the Immaculate Conception of the Virgin Mary Our Lady of La Salette Our Lady of Lourdes First Vatican Council Papal infallibility Pope Leo XIII Mary of the Divine Heart Prayer of Consecration to the Sacred Heart Rerum novarum 20th century Pope Pius X Our Lady of Fátima Persecutions of the Catholic Church and Pius XII Pope Pius XII Pope Pius XII Consecration to the Immaculate Heart of Mary Dogma of the Assumption of the Virgin Mary Lateran Treaty Nazism Pope John XXIII Second Vatican Council Pope Paul VI Pope John Paul I Mother Teresa Communism Pope John Paul II World Youth Day 1995 21st century Sexual abuse scandal Islam World Youth Day 2000 2002 2005 2008 2011 2013 2016 2019 Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis COVID-19 pandemic  Vatican City portal  Catholicism portal Portals Access related topics Biography portal Christianity portal Saints portal Authority control BIBSYS: 90272306 BNE: XX874236 BNF: cb119074986 (data) CANTIC: a10483937 CiNii: DA01043789 GND: 118550853 ICCU: IT\ICCU\CFIV\010145 ISNI: 0000 0001 2321 3293 LCCN: n79124709 MBA: 020ed8c3-99d5-4e54-a52f-d6d349e46dcb NDL: 01023878 NKC: jn19981001563 NLA: 36534521 NLG: 91884 NLI: 000125685 NSK: 000034555 NTA: 069616353 SELIBR: 189318 SNAC: w6r5192c SUDOC: 027396436 TePapa: 47731 Trove: 1277857 ULAN: 500060933 VcBA: 495/16594 VIAF: 95147024 WorldCat Identities: viaf-95147024 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jerome&oldid=996415972" Categories: Jerome 347 births 420 deaths 4th-century Christian theologians 4th-century historians 4th-century Latin writers 4th-century Romans 4th-century translators 5th-century Latin writers 5th-century Romans 5th-century translators Christian apologists Christian hagiographers Christian writers about eschatology Chronologists Church Fathers Roman Catholics Doctors of the Church Illyrian people Hieronymite Order Holy Land travellers Latin letter writers People from Roman Dalmatia Roman Catholic theologians Translation scholars Translators of the Bible into Latin 5th-century Christian saints Hidden categories: Webarchive template wayback links Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata Use dmy dates from December 2020 Articles with hCards Articles containing Latin-language text Articles containing Ancient Greek (to 1453)-language text All articles lacking reliable references Articles lacking reliable references from April 2019 All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from April 2019 Articles with unsourced statements from January 2019 Articles needing additional references from August 2011 All articles needing additional references Articles with unsourced statements from June 2014 Commons link is locally defined Articles incorporating a citation from the 1913 Catholic Encyclopedia with Wikisource reference Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CANTIC identifiers Wikipedia articles with CINII identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ICCU identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with MusicBrainz identifiers Wikipedia articles with NDL identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLG identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLI identifiers Wikipedia articles with NSK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SNAC-ID identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with TePapa identifiers Wikipedia articles with Trove identifiers Wikipedia articles with ULAN identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers AC with 25 elements Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikiquote Wikisource Languages Afrikaans العربية Asturianu Azərbaycanca Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ Български Boarisch Brezhoneg Català Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français Frysk Gaeilge Galego 한국어 Հայերեն हिन्दी Hrvatski Bahasa Indonesia Interlingua Italiano עברית Kabɩyɛ Kiswahili Latina Latviešu Lëtzebuergesch Lietuvių Ligure Lumbaart Magyar Malagasy മലയാളം Malti مصرى Монгол Nederlands Nedersaksies 日本語 Norsk bokmål Norsk nynorsk Nouormand پنجابی Polski Português Română Русский Sardu Scots Shqip Sicilianu Simple English Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Tagalog தமிழ் ไทย Türkçe Українська اردو Vèneto Tiếng Việt Winaray 吴语 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 26 December 2020, at 13:39 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1351 ---- Category:Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers - Wikipedia Help Category:Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search This category is for articles with SUDOC identifiers. Please do not add subcategories. For more information, see Wikipedia:Authority control. Administrators: Please do not delete this category even if it is empty! This category may be empty occasionally or even most of the time. This is a maintenance category, used for maintenance of the Wikipedia project. It is not part of the encyclopedia and contains non-article pages, or groups articles by status rather than subject. Do not include this category in content categories. This is a tracking category. It builds and maintains a list of pages primarily for the sake of the list itself. They are not part of the encyclopedia's categorization scheme. This category is hidden on its member pages—unless the corresponding user preference (appearance → show hidden categories) is set. These categories are used to track, build and organize lists of pages needing "attention en masse" (for example, pages using deprecated syntax), or that may need to be edited at someone's earliest convenience. These categories also serve to aggregate members of several lists or sub-categories into a larger, more efficient list (discriminated by classifications). Contents: Top 0–9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z * # 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 • A Aa Ae Aj Ao At • B Ba Be Bj Bo Bt • C Ca Ce Cj Co Ct • D Da De Dj Do Dt • E Ea Ee Ej Eo Et • F Fa Fe Fj Fo Ft • G Ga Ge Gj Go Gt • H Ha He Hj Ho Ht • I Ia Ie Ij Io It • J Ja Je Jj Jo Jt • K Ka Ke Kj Ko Kt • L La Le Lj Lo Lt • M Ma Me Mj Mo Mt • N Na Ne Nj No Nt • O Oa Oe Oj Oo Ot • P Pa Pe Pj Po Pt • Q Qa Qe Qj Qo Qt • R Ra Re Rj Ro Rt • S Sa Se Sj So St • T Ta Te Tj To Tt • U Ua Ue Uj Uo Ut • V Va Ve Vj Vo Vt • W Wa We Wj Wo Wt • X Xa Xe Xj Xo Xt • Y Ya Ye Yj Yo Yt • Z Za Ze Zj Zo Zt Pages in this category should only be added by Module:Authority control. Pages in category "Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers" The following 200 pages are in this category, out of approximately 223,003 total. This list may not reflect recent changes (learn more). (previous page) (next page), Ishida Hakyō Kawabata Bōsha Kawahigashi Hekigotō Saitō Sanki Yamaguchi Seishi Yusaku Kamekura 0–9 2 Unlimited 2nd SS Panzer Division Das Reich 2raumwohnung 3 Doors Down 3 Inches of Blood 3 of a Kind (group) 3rd Wish 4hero The 6th Day 8½ 8 Women 12 Angry Men (1957 film) The 13th Floor Elevators 13th Waffen Mountain Division of the SS Handschar (1st Croatian) 15th arrondissement of Paris 17 Hippies 21st Century Museum of Contemporary Art, Kanazawa 24 heures (Switzerland) 26th of July Movement The 39 Steps (1935 film) 42nd Street (film) 50 Cent The 120 Days of Sodom 391 (magazine) The 400 Blows The 411 666 (band) 1851 French coup d'état 1954 Geneva Conference 1968 Winter Olympics 1971 Turkish military memorandum 1972 Winter Olympics 1973 oil crisis 1980 Turkish coup d'état 1988 Winter Olympics 1990 FIFA World Cup 1991 Soviet coup d'état attempt 1992 Winter Olympics 1994 Winter Olympics 1998 Winter Olympics 2001: A Space Odyssey (film) 2009 L'Aquila earthquake 2016 Summer Olympics 2016 United Kingdom European Union membership referendum 2046 (film) 10,000 Maniacs A Thomas Turner à Beckett Norbert A'Campo Michael A'Hearn Brynjar Aa Hubertus Antonius van der Aa Petrus van der Aa Pieter van der Aa AABB Per Aabel Asger Aaboe Karen Aabye AACE International Herb Aach Aachen RWTH Aachen University Aachen Cathedral Aachen Cathedral Treasury Hans von Aachen Roman Catholic Diocese of Aachen Erik Aaes Bertus Aafjes Gunnar Aagaard Andersen Prince Aage, Count of Rosenborg Frøy Aagre David Aaker Kim Fupz Aakeson Jeppe Aakjær Mikkel Aaland Aalborg Symphony Orchestra Odd Aalen Ahmad Aali Aaliyah Sengai Aaliyan Anathon Aall Jacob Aall Wil van der Aalst Aino Aalto Alvar Aalto Elissa Aalto Pentti Aalto Remu Aaltonen Wäinö Aaltonen Bjørn Aamodt Kjetil André Aamodt Jane Aamund Hans Aanrud Hans Aaraas Olav Aaraas Parham Aarabi Jarle Aarbakke Magnus Aarbakke Karen Aardal Verna Aardema Juhan Aare Frank Aarebrot Emil Aarestrup Andreas Aarflot Aarhus University Antti Aarne Asbjørn Aarnes Eero Aarnio Selma Lønning Aarø Aaron ben Moses ben Asher Aaron HaLevi ben Moses of Staroselye Aaron of Jerusalem Benjamin Aaron Caroline Aaron Chester Aaron Daniel Aaron David L. Aaron Henry J. Aaron Jane Aaron (educator) Jason Aaron Quinton Aaron Richard Aaron Soazig Aaron Ben Aaronovitch Sam Aaronovitch Al Aarons Eric Aarons Leroy F. Aarons Mark Aarons Slim Aarons Aaron Aaronsohn Alexander Aaronsohn Sarah Aaronsohn Scott Aaronson Stuart A. Aaronson Kristian Birch-Reichenwald Aars Eivind Aarset Asbjørn Aarseth Espen Aarseth Sverre Aarseth Hans Aarsman Francis van Aarssens Aart van der Leeuw Tapani Aartomaa Kees Aarts Kjell Aartun Nils Aas Ivar Aasen John Aasen Anne Aaserud Håkon Aasnes Khwaja Haidar Ali Aatish Johannes Aavik Ab Urbe Condita Libri Aziz Ab'Sáber Vilmos Aba-Novák Noureddine Aba Sani Abacha Joseph Abaco Diego Abad de Santillán Manuel Abad y Queipo Antoni Abad Antonio Abad Diego José Abad Gémino Abad Mercedes Abad Ramon d'Abadal i de Vinyals Nermin Abadan Unat Martín Abadi Moussa Abadi Guillermo Abadía Morales Jean Marie Charles Abadie Joseph Abadie Jules Abadie Lisandro Abadie Paul Abadie Gjorgji Abadžiev Nick Abadzis Vasily Abaev Frank Abagnale Abaji (Lebanese musician) Edmund Abaka Bruno Abakanowicz Magdalena Abakanowicz Yunus Nadi Abalıoğlu Leonid Abalkin Iñaki Ábalos Rafael Ábalos François-Jean Willemain d'Abancourt Chris Abani Marie Thérèse Péroux d'Abany ABAP Masseot Abaquesne Bettina Abarbanell Pedro Pablo Abarca de Bolea, 10th Count of Aranda (previous page) (next page) Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Wikipedia_articles_with_SUDOC_identifiers&oldid=846549332" Categories: Pages with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with authority control information Hidden categories: Hidden categories Tracking categories Template Large category TOC via CatAutoTOC on category with over 20,000 pages CatAutoTOC generates Large category TOC Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Category Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Afrikaans Asturianu Български Español 한국어 Ilokano Bahasa Indonesia עברית Bahasa Melayu 日本語 ଓଡ଼ିଆ Português Română Sardu Scots Simple English Slovenščina Suomi Svenska Türkçe 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 19 June 2018, at 12:52 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1374 ---- Internet Archive - Wikipedia Internet Archive From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search For other uses, see Internet archive (disambiguation). For help citing the Wayback Machine (an Internet Archive service) in the English Wikipedia, see Help:Using the Wayback Machine. "archive.org" redirects here. It is not to be confused with arXiv.org. American non-profit organization providing archives of digital media Coordinates: 37°46′56″N 122°28′18″W / 37.782321°N 122.47161137°W / 37.782321; -122.47161137 Internet Archive Type of business 501(c)(3) nonprofit Type of site Digital library Available in English Founded May 12, 1996; 24 years ago (1996-05-12)[notes 1][1] Headquarters Richmond District San Francisco, California, U.S. Chairman Brewster Kahle Services Archive-It Open Library Wayback Machine (since 2001) Netlabels NASA Images Prelinger Archives Revenue $20.3 million (2018)[2] Employees 168 (2018)[2] URL archive.org Launched 1996 (1996) Current status Active Current headquarters[as of?] The Internet Archive is an American digital library with the stated mission of "universal access to all knowledge".[notes 2][notes 3] It provides free public access to collections of digitized materials, including websites, software applications/games, music, movies/videos, moving images, and millions of books. In addition to its archiving function, the Archive is an activist organization, advocating a free and open Internet. The Internet Archive currently holds over 28 million books and texts, 6 million movies and videos, 600,000 software programs, 15 million audio files, and 492 billion web pages in the Wayback Machine.[needs update] The Internet Archive allows the public to upload and download digital material to its data cluster, but the bulk of its data is collected automatically by its web crawlers, which work to preserve as much of the public web as possible. Its web archive, the Wayback Machine, contains hundreds of billions of web captures.[notes 4][3] The Archive also oversees one of the world's largest book digitization projects. Contents 1 Operations 2 History 3 Web archiving 3.1 Wayback Machine 3.2 Archive-It 3.3 Internet Archive Scholar 4 Book collections 4.1 Text collection 4.2 Number of texts for each language 4.3 Number of texts for each decade 4.4 Open Library 4.5 Digitizing sponsors for books 5 Media collections 5.1 Audio collection 5.2 Brooklyn Museum 5.3 Images collection 5.3.1 Cover Art Archive 5.3.2 Metropolitan Museum of Art images 5.3.3 NASA Images 5.3.4 Occupy Wall Street Flickr archive 5.3.5 USGS Maps 5.4 Machinima archive 5.5 Mathematics – Hamid Naderi Yeganeh 5.6 Microfilm collection 5.7 Moving image collection 5.8 Netlabels 5.9 Open Educational Resources 5.10 TV News Search & Borrow 6 Other services and endeavors 6.1 Physical media 6.2 Software 6.3 Table Top Scribe System 6.4 Credit Union 7 Controversies and legal disputes 7.1 Grateful Dead 7.2 National security letters 7.3 Opposition to SOPA and PIPA bills 7.4 Opposition to Google Books settlement 7.5 Nintendo Power magazine 7.6 Government of India 7.7 Turkey 7.8 National Emergency Library 8 Ceramic archivists collection 9 Artists in residence 10 See also 11 Notes 12 References 13 Further reading 14 External links Operations[edit] This section needs to be updated. Please update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. (May 2020) Mirror of the Internet Archive in the Bibliotheca Alexandrina The Archive is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit operating in the United States. It has an annual budget of $10 million, derived from revenue from its Web crawling services, various partnerships, grants, donations, and the Kahle-Austin Foundation.[4] The Internet Archive also manages periodic funding campaigns. For instance, a December 2019 campaign had a goal of reaching $6 million in donations.[citation needed] The Archive is headquartered in San Francisco, California. From 1996 to 2009, its headquarters were in the Presidio of San Francisco, a former U.S. military base. Since 2009, its headquarters have been at 300 Funston Avenue in San Francisco, a former Christian Science Church. At one time, most of its staff worked in its book-scanning centers; as of 2019, scanning is performed by 100 paid operators worldwide.[5] The Archive also has data centers in three Californian cities: San Francisco, Redwood City, and Richmond. To reduce the risk of data loss, the Archive creates copies of parts of its collection at more distant locations, including the Bibliotheca Alexandrina[notes 5] in Egypt and a facility in Amsterdam.[6] The Archive is a member of the International Internet Preservation Consortium[7] and was officially designated as a library by the state of California in 2007.[notes 6] History[edit] 2008 headquarters Brewster Kahle founded the archive in May 1996 at around the same time that he began the for-profit web crawling company Alexa Internet.[notes 7] In October 1996, the Internet Archive had begun to archive and preserve the World Wide Web in large quantities,[notes 8] though it saved the earliest pages in May 1996.[8][9] The archived content wasn't available to the general public until 2001, when it developed the Wayback Machine. In late 1999, the Archive expanded its collections beyond the Web archive, beginning with the Prelinger Archives. Now the Internet Archive includes texts, audio, moving images, and software. It hosts a number of other projects: the NASA Images Archive, the contract crawling service Archive-It, and the wiki-editable library catalog and book information site Open Library. Soon after that, the archive began working to provide specialized services relating to the information access needs of the print-disabled; publicly accessible books were made available in a protected Digital Accessible Information System (DAISY) format.[notes 9] According to its website:[notes 10] Most societies place importance on preserving artifacts of their culture and heritage. Without such artifacts, civilization has no memory and no mechanism to learn from its successes and failures. Our culture now produces more and more artifacts in digital form. The Archive's mission is to help preserve those artifacts and create an Internet library for researchers, historians, and scholars. In August 2012, the archive announced[10] that it has added BitTorrent to its file download options for more than 1.3 million existing files, and all newly uploaded files.[11][12] This method is the fastest means of downloading media from the Archive, as files are served from two Archive data centers, in addition to other torrent clients which have downloaded and continue to serve the files.[11][notes 11] On November 6, 2013, the Internet Archive's headquarters in San Francisco's Richmond District caught fire,[13] destroying equipment and damaging some nearby apartments.[14] According to the Archive, it lost a side-building housing one of 30 of its scanning centers; cameras, lights, and scanning equipment worth hundreds of thousands of dollars; and "maybe 20 boxes of books and film, some irreplaceable, most already digitized, and some replaceable".[15] The nonprofit Archive sought donations to cover the estimated $600,000 in damage.[16] In November 2016, Kahle announced that the Internet Archive was building the Internet Archive of Canada, a copy of the archive to be based somewhere in Canada. The announcement received widespread coverage due to the implication that the decision to build a backup archive in a foreign country was because of the upcoming presidency of Donald Trump.[17][18][19] Kahle was quoted as saying: On November 9th in America, we woke up to a new administration promising radical change. It was a firm reminder that institutions like ours, built for the long-term, need to design for change. For us, it means keeping our cultural materials safe, private and perpetually accessible. It means preparing for a Web that may face greater restrictions. It means serving patrons in a world in which government surveillance is not going away; indeed it looks like it will increase. Throughout history, libraries have fought against terrible violations of privacy—where people have been rounded up simply for what they read. At the Internet Archive, we are fighting to protect our readers' privacy in the digital world.[17] Since 2018, the Internet Archive visual arts residency, which is organized by Amir Saber Esfahani and Andrew McClintock, helps connect artists with the archive's over 48 petabytes[notes 12] of digitized materials. Over the course of the yearlong residency, visual artists create a body of work which culminates in an exhibition. The hope is to connect digital history with the arts and create something for future generations to appreciate online or off.[20] Previous artists in residence include Taravat Talepasand, Whitney Lynn, and Jenny Odell.[21] In 2019, its headquarters in San Francisco received a bomb threat which forced a temporary evacuation of the building.[22] The Internet Archive acquires most materials from donations,[notes 13] such as hundreds of thousands of 78 rpm discs from Boston Public Library in 2017,[23] a donation of 250,000 books from Trent University in 2018,[24] and the entire collection of Marygrove College's library in 2020 after it closed.[25] All material is then digitized and retained in digital storage, while a digital copy is returned to the original holder and the Internet Archive's copy, if not in the public domain, is borrowed to patrons worldwide one at a time under the controlled digital lending (CDL) theory of the first-sale doctrine.[26] Web archiving[edit] Wayback Machine[edit] Main article: Wayback Machine Wayback Machine logo, used since 2001 Mark Graham The Internet Archive capitalized on the popular use of the term "WABAC Machine" from a segment of The Adventures of Rocky and Bullwinkle cartoon (specifically Peabody's Improbable History), and uses the name "Wayback Machine" for its service that allows archives of the World Wide Web to be searched and accessed.[27] This service allows users to view some of the archived web pages. The Wayback Machine was created as a joint effort between Alexa Internet and the Internet Archive when a three-dimensional index was built to allow for the browsing of archived web content.[notes 14] Millions of web sites and their associated data (images, source code, documents, etc.) are saved in a database. The service can be used to see what previous versions of web sites used to look like, to grab original source code from web sites that may no longer be directly available, or to visit web sites that no longer even exist. Not all web sites are available because many web site owners choose to exclude their sites. As with all sites based on data from web crawlers, the Internet Archive misses large areas of the web for a variety of other reasons. A 2004 paper found international biases in the coverage, but deemed them "not intentional".[28] A purchase of additional storage at the Internet Archive A "Save Page Now" archiving feature was made available in October 2013,[29] accessible on the lower right of the Wayback Machine's main page.[notes 15] Once a target URL is entered and saved, the web page will become part of the Wayback Machine.[29] Through the Internet address web.archive.org,[30] users can upload to the Wayback Machine a large variety of contents, including PDF and data compression file formats. The Wayback Machine creates a permanent local URL of the upload content, that is accessible in the web, even if not listed while searching in the http://archive.org official website. May 12, 1996, is the date of the oldest archived pages on the archive.org WayBack Machine, such as infoseek.com.[31] In October 2016, it was announced that the way web pages are counted would be changed, resulting in the decrease of the archived pages counts shown.[32] Year Archived pages (billions) 2005 40[notes 16] 2006 85[notes 17] 2007 85[notes 18] 2008 85[notes 19] 2009 150[notes 20] 2010 150[notes 21] 2011 150[notes 22] 2012 150[notes 23] 2013 373[notes 24] 2014 430[33] 2015 479[notes 25] 2016 510[A][notes 26] 273[B][32] 2017 286[notes 27] 2018 344[notes 28] A Using the old counting system used before October 2016 B Using the new counting system used after October 2016 In September 2020, the Internet Archive announced a partnership with Cloudflare to automatically index websites served via its "Always Online" services.[34] Archive-It[edit] Play media Brewster Kahle of the Internet Archive talks about archiving operations Created in early 2006, Archive-It[35] is a web archiving subscription service that allows institutions and individuals to build and preserve collections of digital content and create digital archives. Archive-It allows the user to customize their capture or exclusion of web content they want to preserve for cultural heritage reasons. Through a web application, Archive-It partners can harvest, catalog, manage, browse, search, and view their archived collections.[36] In terms of accessibility, the archived web sites are full text searchable within seven days of capture.[37] Content collected through Archive-It is captured and stored as a WARC file. A primary and back-up copy is stored at the Internet Archive data centers. A copy of the WARC file can be given to subscribing partner institutions for geo-redundant preservation and storage purposes to their best practice standards.[38] Periodically, the data captured through Archive-It is indexed into the Internet Archive's general archive. As of March 2014[update], Archive-It had more than 275 partner institutions in 46 U.S. states and 16 countries that have captured more than 7.4 billion URLs for more than 2,444 public collections. Archive-It partners are universities and college libraries, state archives, federal institutions, museums, law libraries, and cultural organizations, including the Electronic Literature Organization, North Carolina State Archives and Library, Stanford University, Columbia University, American University in Cairo, Georgetown Law Library, and many others. Internet Archive Scholar[edit] In September 2020 Internet Archive announced a new initiative to archive and preserve open access academic journals, called the "Internet Archive Scholar".[39] Book collections[edit] Text collection[edit] Internet Archive "Scribe" book scanning workstation The Internet Archive operates 33 scanning centers in five countries, digitizing about 1,000 books a day for a total of more than 2 million books,[40] financially supported by libraries and foundations.[notes 29] As of July 2013[update], the collection included 4.4 million books with more than 15 million downloads per month.[40] As of November 2008[update], when there were approximately 1 million texts, the entire collection was greater than 0.5 petabytes, which includes raw camera images, cropped and skewed images, PDFs, and raw OCR data.[41] Between about 2006 and 2008, Microsoft had a special relationship with Internet Archive texts through its Live Search Books project, scanning more than 300,000 books that were contributed to the collection, as well as financial support and scanning equipment. On May 23, 2008, Microsoft announced it would be ending the Live Book Search project and no longer scanning books.[42] Microsoft made its scanned books available without contractual restriction and donated its scanning equipment to its former partners.[42] An Internet Archive in-house scan ongoing Around October 2007, Archive users began uploading public domain books from Google Book Search.[notes 30] As of November 2013[update], there were more than 900,000 Google-digitized books in the Archive's collection;[notes 31] the books are identical to the copies found on Google, except without the Google watermarks, and are available for unrestricted use and download.[43] Brewster Kahle revealed in 2013 that this archival effort was coordinated by Aaron Swartz, who with a "bunch of friends" downloaded the public domain books from Google slow enough and from enough computers to stay within Google's restrictions. They did this to ensure public access to the public domain. The Archive ensured the items were attributed and linked back to Google, which never complained, while libraries "grumbled". According to Kahle, this is an example of Swartz's "genius" to work on what could give the most to the public good for millions of people.[44] Besides books, the Archive offers free and anonymous public access to more than four million court opinions, legal briefs, or exhibits uploaded from the United States Federal Courts' PACER electronic document system via the RECAP web browser plugin. These documents had been kept behind a federal court paywall. On the Archive, they had been accessed by more than six million people by 2013.[44] The Archive's BookReader web app,[45] built into its website, has features such as single-page, two-page, and thumbnail modes; fullscreen mode; page zooming of high-resolution images; and flip page animation.[45][46] Number of texts for each language[edit] Number of all texts (December 9, 2019) 22,197,912[47] Language Number of texts (November 27, 2015) English 6,553,945[notes 32] French 358,721[notes 33] German 344,810[notes 34] Spanish 134,170[notes 35] Chinese 84,147[notes 36] Arabic 66,786[notes 37] Dutch 30,237[notes 38] Portuguese 25,938[notes 39] Russian 22,731[notes 40] Urdu 14,978[notes 41] Japanese 14,795[notes 42] Number of texts for each decade[edit] XIX century Decade Number of texts (November 27, 2015) 1800s 39,842[notes 43] 1810s 51,151[notes 44] 1820s 79,476[notes 45] 1830s 105,021[notes 46] 1840s 127,649[notes 47] 1850s 180,950[notes 48] 1860s 210,574[notes 49] 1870s 214,505[notes 50] 1880s 285,984[notes 51] 1890s 370,726[notes 52] XX century Decade Number of texts (November 27, 2015) 1900s 504,000[notes 53] 1910s 455,539[notes 54] 1920s 185,876[notes 55] 1930s 70,190[notes 56] 1940s 85,062[notes 57] 1950s 81,192[notes 58] 1960s 125,977[notes 59] 1970s 206,870[notes 60] 1980s 181,129[notes 61] 1990s 272,848[notes 62] XXI century Decade Number of texts (November 27, 2015) 2000s 579,905[notes 63] 2010s 855,253[notes 64] Open Library[edit] Main article: Open Library The Open Library is another project of the Internet Archive. The wiki seeks to include a web page for every book ever published: it holds 25 million catalog records of editions. It also seeks to be a web-accessible public library: it contains the full texts of approximately 1,600,000 public domain books (out of the more than five million from the main texts collection), as well as in-print and in-copyright books,[48] many of which are fully readable, downloadable[49][50] and full-text searchable;[51] it offers a two-week loan of e-books in its controlled digital lending program for over 647,784 books not in the public domain, in partnership with over 1,000 library partners from 6 countries[40][52] after a free registration on the web site. Open Library is a free and open-source software project, with its source code freely available on GitHub. The Open Library faces objections from some authors and the Society of Authors, who hold that the project is distributing books without authorization and is thus in violation of copyright laws,[53] and four major publishers initiated a copyright infringement lawsuit against the Internet Archive in June 2020 to stop the Open Library project.[54] Digitizing sponsors for books[edit] Many large institutional sponsors have helped the Internet Archive provide millions of scanned publications (text items).[55] Some sponsors that have digitized large quantities of texts include the University of Toronto's Robarts Library, the University of Alberta Libraries, the University of Ottawa, the Library of Congress, Boston Library Consortium member libraries, the Boston Public Library, the Princeton Theological Seminary Library, and many others.[56] In 2017, the MIT Press authorized the Internet Archive to digitize and lend books from the press's backlist,[57] with financial support from the Arcadia Fund.[58][59] A year later, the Internet Archive received further funding from the Arcadia Fund to invite some other university presses to partner with the Internet Archive to digitize books, a project called "Unlocking University Press Books".[60][61] The Library of Congress has created numerous handle system identifers that point to free digitized books in the Internet Archive.[62] The Internet Archive and Open Library are listed on the Library of Congress website as a source of e-books.[63] Media collections[edit] Media reader Microfilms at the Internet Archive Videocassettes at the Internet Archive In addition to web archives, the Internet Archive maintains extensive collections of digital media that are attested by the uploader to be in the public domain in the United States or licensed under a license that allows redistribution, such as Creative Commons licenses. Media are organized into collections by media type (moving images, audio, text, etc.), and into sub-collections by various criteria. Each of the main collections includes a "Community" sub-collection (formerly named "Open Source") where general contributions by the public are stored. Audio collection[edit] Main articles: Live Music Archive and The Great 78 Project The Audio Archive includes music, audiobooks, news broadcasts, old time radio shows, and a wide variety of other audio files. There are more than 200,000 free digital recordings in the collection. The subcollections include audio books and poetry, podcasts, non-English audio, and many others.[notes 65] The sound collections are curated by B. George, director of the ARChive of Contemporary Music.[64] The Live Music Archive sub-collection includes more than 170,000 concert recordings from independent musicians, as well as more established artists and musical ensembles with permissive rules about recording their concerts, such as the Grateful Dead, and more recently, The Smashing Pumpkins. Also, Jordan Zevon has allowed the Internet Archive to host a definitive collection of his father Warren Zevon's concert recordings. The Zevon collection ranges from 1976 to 2001 and contains 126 concerts including 1,137 songs.[65] The Great 78 Project aims to digitize 250,000 78 rpm singles (500,000 songs) from the period between 1880 and 1960, donated by various collectors and institutions. It has been developed in collaboration with the Archive of Contemporary Music and George Blood Audio, responsible for the audio digitization.[64] Brooklyn Museum[edit] This collection contains approximately 3,000 items from Brooklyn Museum.[notes 66] Images collection[edit] This collection contains more than 3.5 million items.[66] Cover Art Archive, Metropolitan Museum of Art - Gallery Images, NASA Images, Occupy Wall Street Flickr Archive, and USGS Maps and are some sub-collections of Image collection. Cover Art Archive[edit] The Cover Art Archive is a joint project between the Internet Archive and MusicBrainz, whose goal is to make cover art images on the Internet. This collection contains more than 330,000 items.[notes 67] Metropolitan Museum of Art images[edit] The images of this collection are from the Metropolitan Museum of Art. This collection contains more than 140,000 items.[notes 68] NASA Images[edit] The NASA Images archive was created through a Space Act Agreement between the Internet Archive and NASA to bring public access to NASA's image, video, and audio collections in a single, searchable resource. The IA NASA Images team worked closely with all of the NASA centers to keep adding to the ever-growing collection.[67] The nasaimages.org site launched in July 2008 and had more than 100,000 items online at the end of its hosting in 2012. Occupy Wall Street Flickr archive[edit] This collection contains creative commons licensed photographs from Flickr related to the Occupy Wall Street movement. This collection contains more than 15,000 items.[notes 69] USGS Maps[edit] This collection contains more than 59,000 items from Libre Map Project.[notes 70] Machinima archive[edit] One of the sub-collections of the Internet Archive's Video Archive is the Machinima Archive. This small section hosts many Machinima videos. Machinima is a digital artform in which computer games, game engines, or software engines are used in a sandbox-like mode to create motion pictures, recreate plays, or even publish presentations or keynotes. The archive collects a range of Machinima films from internet publishers such as Rooster Teeth and Machinima.com as well as independent producers. The sub-collection is a collaborative effort among the Internet Archive, the How They Got Game research project at Stanford University, the Academy of Machinima Arts and Sciences, and Machinima.com.[notes 71] Mathematics – Hamid Naderi Yeganeh[edit] This collection contains mathematical images created by mathematical artist Hamid Naderi Yeganeh.[notes 72] Microfilm collection[edit] This collection contains approximately 160,000 items from a variety of libraries including the University of Chicago Libraries, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, the University of Alberta, Allen County Public Library, and the National Technical Information Service.[notes 73][notes 74] Moving image collection[edit] See also: Wikipedia list of films freely available on the Internet Archive The Internet Archive holds a collection of approximately 3,863 feature films.[notes 75] Additionally, the Internet Archive's Moving Image collection includes: newsreels, classic cartoons, pro- and anti-war propaganda, The Video Cellar Collection, Skip Elsheimer's "A.V. Geeks" collection, early television, and ephemeral material from Prelinger Archives, such as advertising, educational, and industrial films, as well as amateur and home movie collections. Subcategories of this collection include: IA's Brick Films collection, which contains stop-motion animation filmed with Lego bricks, some of which are "remakes" of feature films. IA's Election 2004 collection, a non-partisan public resource for sharing video materials related to the 2004 United States presidential election. IA's FedFlix collection, Joint Venture NTIS-1832 between the National Technical Information Service and Public.Resource.Org that features "the best movies of the United States Government, from training films to history, from our national parks to the U.S. Fire Academy and the Postal Inspectors"[notes 76] IA's Independent News collection, which includes sub-collections such as the Internet Archive's World At War competition from 2001, in which contestants created short films demonstrating "why access to history matters". Among their most-downloaded video files are eyewitness recordings of the devastating 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake. IA's September 11 Television Archive, which contains archival footage from the world's major television networks of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, as they unfolded on live television.[notes 77] Netlabels[edit] Not to be confused with Netlabel. The Archive has a collection of freely distributable music that is streamed and available for download via its Netlabels service. The music in this collection generally has Creative Commons-license catalogs of virtual record labels.[notes 78][68] Open Educational Resources[edit] Open Educational Resources is a digital collection at archive.org. This collection contains hundreds of free courses, video lectures, and supplemental materials from universities in the United States and China. The contributors of this collection are ArsDigita University, Hewlett Foundation, MIT, Monterey Institute, and Naropa University.[notes 79] TV News Search & Borrow[edit] TV tuners at the Internet Archive In September 2012, the Internet Archive launched the TV News Search & Borrow service for searching U.S. national news programs.[notes 80] The service is built on closed captioning transcripts and allows users to search and stream 30-second video clips. Upon launch, the service contained "350,000 news programs collected over 3 years from national U.S. networks and stations in San Francisco and Washington D.C."[69] According to Kahle, the service was inspired by the Vanderbilt Television News Archive, a similar library of televised network news programs.[70] In contrast to Vanderbilt, which limits access to streaming video to individuals associated with subscribing colleges and universities, the TV News Search & Borrow allows open access to its streaming video clips. In 2013, the Archive received an additional donation of "approximately 40,000 well-organized tapes" from the estate of a Philadelphia woman, Marion Stokes. Stokes "had recorded more than 35 years of TV news in Philadelphia and Boston with her VHS and Betamax machines."[71] Other services and endeavors[edit] Physical media[edit] A vintage wall intercom, an example of another "archived" item Voicing a strong reaction to the idea of books simply being thrown away, and inspired by the Svalbard Global Seed Vault, Kahle now envisions collecting one copy of every book ever published. "We're not going to get there, but that's our goal", he said. Alongside the books, Kahle plans to store the Internet Archive's old servers, which were replaced in 2010.[72] Software[edit] The Internet Archive has "the largest collection of historical software online in the world", spanning 50 years of computer history in terabytes of computer magazines and journals, books, shareware discs, FTP web sites, video games, etc. The Internet Archive has created an archive of what it describes as "vintage software", as a way to preserve them.[notes 81] The project advocated for an exemption from the United States Digital Millennium Copyright Act to permit them to bypass copy protection, which was approved in 2003 for a period of three years.[notes 82] The Archive does not offer the software for download, as the exemption is solely "for the purpose of preservation or archival reproduction of published digital works by a library or archive."[73] The exemption was renewed in 2006, and in 2009 was indefinitely extended pending further rulemakings.[74] The Library reiterated the exemption as a "Final Rule" with no expiration date in 2010.[75] In 2013, the Internet Archive began to provide abandonware video games browser-playable via MESS, for instance the Atari 2600 game E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial.[76] Since December 23, 2014, the Internet Archive presents, via a browser-based DOSBox emulation, thousands of DOS/PC games[77][78][notes 83][79] for "scholarship and research purposes only".[notes 84][80][81] In November 2020, the Archive introduced a new emulator for Adobe Flash called Ruffle, and began archiving Flash animations and games ahead of the December 31, 2020 end-of-life for the Flash plugin across all computer systems.[82] Table Top Scribe System[edit] A combined hardware software system has been developed that performs a safe method of digitizing content.[notes 85][83] Credit Union[edit] From 2012 to November 2015, the Internet Archive operated the Internet Archive Federal Credit Union, a federal credit union based in New Brunswick, New Jersey, with the goal of providing access to low- and middle-income people. Throughout its short existence, the IAFCU experienced significant conflicts with the National Credit Union Administration, which severely limited the IAFCU's loan portfolio and concerns over serving Bitcoin firms. At the time of its dissolution, it consisted of 395 members and was worth $2.5 million.[84][85] Controversies and legal disputes[edit] See also: Wayback Machine § In legal evidence The main hall of the current headquarters Grateful Dead[edit] In November 2005, free downloads of Grateful Dead concerts were removed from the site. John Perry Barlow identified Bob Weir, Mickey Hart, and Bill Kreutzmann as the instigators of the change, according to an article in The New York Times.[86] Phil Lesh commented on the change in a November 30, 2005, posting to his personal web site: It was brought to my attention that all of the Grateful Dead shows were taken down from Archive.org right before Thanksgiving. I was not part of this decision making process and was not notified that the shows were to be pulled. I do feel that the music is the Grateful Dead's legacy and I hope that one way or another all of it is available for those who want it.[87] A November 30 forum post from Brewster Kahle summarized what appeared to be the compromise reached among the band members. Audience recordings could be downloaded or streamed, but soundboard recordings were to be available for streaming only. Concerts have since been re-added.[notes 86] National security letters[edit] A national security letter issued to the Internet Archive demanding information about a user On May 8, 2008, it was revealed that the Internet Archive had successfully challenged an FBI national security letter asking for logs on an undisclosed user.[88][89] On November 28, 2016, it was revealed that a second FBI national security letter had been successfully challenged that had been asking for logs on another undisclosed user.[90] Opposition to SOPA and PIPA bills[edit] The Internet Archive blacked out its web site for 12 hours on January 18, 2012, in protest of the Stop Online Piracy Act and the PROTECT IP Act bills, two pieces of legislation in the United States Congress that they claimed would "negatively affect the ecosystem of web publishing that led to the emergence of the Internet Archive". This occurred in conjunction with the English Wikipedia blackout, as well as numerous other protests across the Internet.[91] Opposition to Google Books settlement[edit] The Internet Archive is a member of the Open Book Alliance, which has been among the most outspoken critics of the Google Book Settlement. The Archive advocates an alternative digital library project.[92] Nintendo Power magazine[edit] In February 2016, Internet Archive users had begun archiving digital copies of Nintendo Power, Nintendo's official magazine for their games and products, which ran from 1988 to 2012. The first 140 issues had been collected, before Nintendo had the archive removed on August 8, 2016. In response to the take-down, Nintendo told gaming website Polygon, "[Nintendo] must protect our own characters, trademarks and other content. The unapproved use of Nintendo's intellectual property can weaken our ability to protect and preserve it, or to possibly use it for new projects".[93] Government of India[edit] In August 2017, the Department of Telecommunications of the Government of India blocked the Internet Archive along with other file-sharing websites, in accordance with two court orders issued by the Madras High Court,[94] citing piracy concerns after copies of two Bollywood films were allegedly shared via the service.[95] The HTTP version of the Archive was blocked but it remained accessible using the HTTPS protocol.[94] Turkey[edit] See also: Censorship in Turkey On October 9, 2016, the Internet Archive was temporarily blocked in Turkey after it was used (amongst other file hosters) by hackers to host 17 GB of leaked government emails.[96][97] National Emergency Library[edit] In the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic which closed many schools, universities, and libraries, the Archive announced on March 24, 2020 that it was creating the National Emergency Library by removing the lending restrictions it had in place for 1.4 million digitized books in its Open Library but otherwise limiting users to the number of books they could check out and enforcing their return; normally, the site would only allow one digital lending for each physical copy of the book they had, by use of an encrypted file that would become unusable after the lending period was completed. This Library would remain as such until at least June 30, 2020 or until the US national emergency was over, whichever came later.[98] At launch, the Internet Archive allowed authors and rightholders to submit opt-out requests for their works to be omitted from the National Emergency Library.[99][100][101] The Internet Archive said the National Emergency Library addressed an "unprecedented global and immediate need for access to reading and research material" due to the closures of physical libraries worldwide.[102] They justified the move in a number of ways. Legally, they said they were promoting access to those inaccessible resources, which they claimed was an exercise in Fair Use principles. The Archive continued implementing their controlled digital lending policy that predated the National Emergency Library, meaning they still encrypted the lent copies and it was no easier for users to create new copies of the books than before. An ultimate determination of whether or not the National Emergency Library constituted Fair Use could only be made by a court. Morally, they also pointed out that the Internet Archive was a registered library like any other, that they either paid for the books themselves or received them as donations, and that lending through libraries predated copyright restrictions.[99][103] However, the Archive had already been criticized by authors and publishers for its prior lending approach, and upon announcement of the National Emergency Library, authors, publishers, and groups representing both took further issue, equating the move to copyright infringement and digital piracy, and using the COVID-19 pandemic as a reason to push the boundaries of copyright (see also: Open Library § Copyright violation accusations).[104][105][106] After the works of some of these authors were ridiculed in responses, the Internet Archive's Jason Scott requested that supporters of the National Emergency Library not denigrate anyone's books: "I realize there's strong debate and disagreement here, but books are life-giving and life-changing and these writers made them."[107] The operation of the National Emergency Library is part of the lawsuit filed against the Open Library project by four major book publishers in June 2020, challenging the copyright validity of the program.[54] In response, the Internet Archive closed the National Emergency Library on June 16, 2020, rather than the planned June 30, 2020, due to the lawsuit.[108][109] The plaintiffs claimed in their lawsuit that the Internet Archive's actions constituted a "willful mass copyright infringement". Additionally, Senator Thom Tillis (R-North Carolina), chairman of the intellectual property subcommittee on the Senate Judiciary Committee, said in a letter to the Internet Archive that he was "concerned that the Internet Archive thinks that it — not Congress — gets to determine the scope of copyright law".[110] The lawsuit trial is tentatively scheduled to begin in November 2021.[111] Ceramic archivists collection[edit] Ceramic figures of Internet Archive employees The Great Room of the Internet Archive features a collection of more than 100 ceramic figures representing employees of the Internet Archive. This collection, inspired by the statues of the Xian warriors in China, was commissioned by Brewster Kahle, sculpted by Nuala Creed, and is ongoing.[112] Artists in residence[edit] The Internet Archive visual arts residency,[113] organized by Amir Saber Esfahani, is designed to connect emerging and mid-career artists with the Archive's millions of collections and to show what is possible when open access to information intersects with the arts. During this one-year residency, selected artists develop a body of work that responds to and utilizes the Archive's collections in their own practice.[114] 2019 Residency Artists: Caleb Duarte, Whitney Lynn, and Jeffrey Alan Scudder. 2018 Residency Artists: Mieke Marple, Chris Sollars, and Taravat Talepasand. 2017 Residency Artists: Laura Kim, Jeremiah Jenkins, and Jenny Odell See also[edit] Internet portal History portal Lists of Internet Archive's collections List of online image archives Public domain music Web archiving Similar projects archive.today Internet Memory Foundation LibriVox National Digital Information Infrastructure and Preservation Program (NDIIPP) National Digital Library Program (NDLP) Project Gutenberg UK Government Web Archive at The National Archives (United Kingdom) UK Web Archive WebCite Other Archive Team Digital dark age Digital preservation Heritrix Link rot Memory hole PetaBox Web crawler Notes[edit] ^ "Internet Archive: About the Archive". Wayback Machine. April 8, 2000. Archived from the original on April 8, 2000. Retrieved March 13, 2016. ^ "Internet Archive Frequently Asked Questions". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on October 21, 2009. Retrieved April 13, 2013. ^ "Internet Archive: Universal Access to all Knowledge". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on March 10, 2013. Retrieved April 13, 2013. ^ "Internet Archive: Projects". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on March 1, 2013. Retrieved March 6, 2013. ^ "Donation to the new Library of Alexandria in Egypt" Archived January 25, 2014, at the Wayback Machine; Alexandria, Egypt; April 20, 2002. Bibliotheca Alexandrina Archived September 2, 2014, at the Wayback Machine. Internet Archive. ^ "Internet Archive officially a library" Archived February 4, 2010, at the Wayback Machine, May 2, 2007. Internet Archive ^ "Brewster Kahle . In Scientific American". Internet Archive. November 4, 1997. Archived from the original on October 11, 1997. Retrieved April 1, 2016. ^ "Internet Archive: In the Collections". Wayback Machine. June 6, 2000. Archived from the original on June 6, 2000. Retrieved March 15, 2016. ^ "Daisy Books for the Print Disabled" Archived January 4, 2013, at the Wayback Machine, February 25, 2013. Internet Archive. ^ "Internet Archive Frequently Asked Questions". archive.org. Archived from the original on October 21, 2009. Retrieved July 7, 2015. ^ "Welcome to Archive torrents" Archived January 19, 2016, at the Wayback Machine. Internet Archive. ^ "Used Paired Space". archive.org. March 8, 2019. Archived from the original on April 2, 2019. Retrieved March 8, 2019. ^ "How do I make a physical donation to the Internet Archive?". Internet Archive Help Center. Retrieved December 4, 2020. See also: "Tag Archives: donations". Internet Archive Blogs. Retrieved December 4, 2020. ^ "Internet Archive. (2012). Frequently Asked Questions". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on October 21, 2009. Retrieved April 13, 2013. ^ "Wayback Machine main page". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on January 3, 2014. Retrieved December 30, 2013. ^ "Internet Archive". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on December 31, 2005. Retrieved March 2, 2014. ^ "Internet Archive". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on December 28, 2006. Retrieved March 2, 2014. ^ "Internet Archive". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on December 28, 2007. Retrieved March 2, 2014. ^ "Internet Archive". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on December 24, 2008. Retrieved March 2, 2014. ^ "Internet Archive". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on December 20, 2009. Retrieved March 2, 2014. ^ "Internet Archive". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on December 30, 2010. Retrieved March 2, 2014. ^ "Internet Archive". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on August 30, 2011. Retrieved March 2, 2014. ^ "Internet Archive". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on October 14, 2002. Retrieved March 2, 2014. ^ "Internet Archive". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on December 31, 2013. Retrieved March 2, 2014. ^ "Internet Archive". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on May 31, 2015. Retrieved December 9, 2018. ^ "Internet Archive". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on September 30, 2016. Retrieved December 9, 2018. ^ "Internet Archive". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on June 1, 2017. Retrieved December 9, 2018. ^ "Internet Archive". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on December 9, 2018. Retrieved December 9, 2018. ^ Kahle, Brewster (May 23, 2008). "Books Scanning to be Publicly Funded" Archived September 24, 2009, at the Wayback Machine. Internet Archive Forums. ^ "Google Books at Internet Archive" Archived October 11, 1997, at the Wayback Machine. Internet Archive. ^ "List of Google scans" Archived January 26, 2014, at the Wayback Machine (search). Internet Archive. ^ "Internet Archive Search : (language:eng OR language:"English")". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on April 15, 2016. Retrieved November 27, 2015. ^ "Internet Archive Search : (language:fre OR language:"French")". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on March 17, 2016. Retrieved November 27, 2015. ^ "Internet Archive Search : (language:ger OR language:"German")". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on January 14, 2016. Retrieved November 27, 2015. ^ "Internet Archive Search : (language:spa OR language:"Spanish")". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on April 8, 2016. Retrieved November 27, 2015. ^ "Internet Archive Search : (language:Chinese OR language:"chi") AND mediatype:texts". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on April 8, 2016. Retrieved November 27, 2015. ^ "Internet Archive Search : (language:ara OR language:"Arabic")". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on March 22, 2016. Retrieved November 27, 2015. ^ "Internet Archive Search : (language:Dutch OR language:"dut") AND mediatype:texts". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on April 8, 2016. Retrieved November 27, 2015. ^ "Internet Archive Search : (language:Portuguese OR language:"por") AND mediatype:texts". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on March 15, 2016. Retrieved November 27, 2015. ^ "Internet Archive Search : (language:rus OR language:"Russian") AND mediatype:texts". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on March 19, 2016. Retrieved November 27, 2015. ^ "Internet Archive Search : (language:urd OR language:"Urdu") AND mediatype:texts". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on March 15, 2016. Retrieved November 27, 2015. ^ "Internet Archive Search : (language:Japanese OR language:"jpn") AND mediatype:texts". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on April 8, 2016. Retrieved November 27, 2015. ^ "Internet Archive Search : mediatype:texts AND date:[1800-01-01 TO 1809-12-31]". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on April 9, 2016. Retrieved November 27, 2015. ^ "Internet Archive Search : mediatype:texts AND date:[1810-01-01 TO 1819-12-31]". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on March 26, 2016. Retrieved November 27, 2015. ^ "Internet Archive Search : mediatype:texts AND date:[1820-01-01 TO 1829-12-31]". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on March 15, 2016. Retrieved November 27, 2015. ^ "Internet Archive Search : mediatype:texts AND date:[1830-01-01 TO 1839-12-31]". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on April 9, 2016. Retrieved November 27, 2015. ^ "Internet Archive Search : mediatype:texts AND date:[1840-01-01 TO 1849-12-31]". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on March 26, 2016. Retrieved November 27, 2015. ^ "Internet Archive Search : mediatype:texts AND date:[1850-01-01 TO 1859-12-31]". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on March 17, 2016. Retrieved November 27, 2015. ^ "Internet Archive Search : mediatype:texts AND date:[1860-01-01 TO 1869-12-31]". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on March 13, 2016. Retrieved November 27, 2015. ^ "Internet Archive Search : mediatype:texts AND date:[1870-01-01 TO 1879-12-31]". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on March 15, 2016. Retrieved November 27, 2015. ^ "Internet Archive Search : mediatype:texts AND date:[1880-01-01 TO 1889-12-31]". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on March 16, 2016. Retrieved November 27, 2015. ^ "Internet Archive Search : mediatype:texts AND date:[1890-01-01 TO 1899-12-31]". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on March 11, 2016. Retrieved November 27, 2015. ^ "Internet Archive Search : mediatype:texts AND date:[1900-01-01 TO 1909-12-31]". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on March 18, 2016. Retrieved November 27, 2015. ^ "Internet Archive Search : mediatype:texts AND date:[1910-01-01 TO 1919-12-31]". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on March 19, 2016. Retrieved November 27, 2015. ^ "Internet Archive Search : mediatype:texts AND date:[1920-01-01 TO 1929-12-31]". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on April 9, 2016. Retrieved November 27, 2015. ^ "Internet Archive Search : mediatype:texts AND date:[1930-01-01 TO 1939-12-31]". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on April 9, 2016. Retrieved November 27, 2015. ^ "Internet Archive Search : mediatype:texts AND date:[1940-01-01 TO 1949-12-31]". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on March 26, 2016. Retrieved November 27, 2015. ^ "Internet Archive Search : mediatype:texts AND date:[1950-01-01 TO 1959-12-31]". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on March 16, 2016. Retrieved November 27, 2015. ^ "Internet Archive Search : mediatype:texts AND date:[1960-01-01 TO 1969-12-31]". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on March 15, 2016. Retrieved November 27, 2015. ^ "Internet Archive Search : mediatype:texts AND date:[1970-01-01 TO 1979-12-31]". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on April 9, 2016. Retrieved November 27, 2015. ^ "Internet Archive Search : mediatype:texts AND date:[1980-01-01 TO 1989-12-31]". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on April 9, 2016. Retrieved November 27, 2015. ^ "Internet Archive Search : mediatype:texts AND date:[1990-01-01 TO 1999-12-31]". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on March 11, 2016. Retrieved November 27, 2015. ^ "Internet Archive Search : mediatype:texts AND date:[2000-01-01 TO 2009-12-31]". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on March 26, 2016. Retrieved November 27, 2015. ^ "Internet Archive Search : mediatype:texts AND date:[2010-01-01 TO 2015-11-27]". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on April 9, 2016. Retrieved November 27, 2015. ^ "Welcome to Audio Archive" Archived January 17, 2014, at the Wayback Machine. Internet Archive. ^ "Brooklyn Museum: Free Image : Download & Streaming : Internet Archive". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on January 3, 2015. Retrieved December 4, 2014. ^ "Cover Art Archive: Free Image : Download & Streaming : Internet Archive". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on January 3, 2015. Retrieved December 4, 2014. ^ "Metropolitan Museum of Art – Gallery Images: Free Image : Download & Streaming : Internet Archive". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on January 3, 2015. Retrieved December 4, 2014. ^ "Occupy Wall Street Flickr Archive: Free Image : Download & Streaming : Internet Archive". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on January 3, 2015. Retrieved December 4, 2014. ^ "USGS Maps: Free Image : Download & Streaming : Internet Archive". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on January 3, 2015. Retrieved December 4, 2014. ^ "Welcome to Machinima" Archived March 23, 2013, at the Wayback Machine. Internet Archive. ^ "Mathematics – Hamid Naderi Yeganeh (Image): Free Image : Download & Streaming : Internet Archive". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on October 14, 2014. Retrieved December 4, 2014. ^ "Internet Archive Search: collection:microfilm". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on March 31, 2016. Retrieved March 20, 2014. ^ "Microfilm". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on March 20, 2014. Retrieved March 20, 2014. ^ "Internet Archive Search: Collection: Feature Films". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on April 2, 2013. Retrieved March 6, 2013. ^ "FedFlix". Internet Archive. Retrieved December 14, 2013. ^ "September 11th Television Archive" Archived April 3, 2014, at the Wayback Machine. Internet Archive. ^ "Welcome to Netlabels" Archived April 4, 2014, at the Wayback Machine. Internet Archive. ^ "Download & Streaming : Open Educational Resources : Internet Archive". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on July 2, 2014. Retrieved June 17, 2014. ^ "TV NEWS : Search Captions. Borrow Broadcasts : TV Archive : Internet Archive". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on April 20, 2013. Retrieved April 13, 2013. ^ "The Internet Archive Classic Software Preservation Project". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on October 19, 2007. Retrieved October 21, 2007. ^ "Internet Archive Gets DMCA Exemption To Help Archive Vintage Software". Archived from the original on October 20, 2007. Retrieved October 21, 2007. ^ collection:softwarelibrary_msdos Archived June 28, 2015, at the Wayback Machine in the Internet Archive (December 29, 2014) ^ "Internet Archive's Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Copyright Policy". December 31, 2014. Archived from the original on January 3, 2015. Retrieved January 8, 2015. Access to the Archive's Collections is provided at no cost to you and is granted for scholarship and research purposes only. ^ "Table Top Scribe System". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on October 10, 2018. Retrieved October 23, 2018. ^ Kahle, Brewster; Vernon, Matt (December 1, 2005). "Good News and an Apology: GD on the Internet Archive". Live Music Archive Forum. Internet Archive. Archived from the original on August 6, 2014. Authors and date indicate the first posting in the forum thread. References[edit] ^ "archive.org WHOIS, DNS, & Domain Info – DomainTools". WHOIS. Archived from the original on November 5, 2018. Retrieved March 13, 2016. ^ a b "Nonprofit Explorer - Internet Archive". ProPublica. Retrieved June 12, 2020. ^ Grotke, A. (December 2011). "Web Archiving at the Library of Congress" Archived December 15, 2013, at the Wayback Machine. Computers In Libraries, v.31 n.10, pp. 15–19. Information Today. ^ Womack, David (Spring 2003). "Who Owns History?". Cabinet Magazine (10). Archived from the original on March 19, 2013. ^ Whitney Kimball. "The Internet Archive Fights Wiki Citation Wars With Books". Gizmodo. Archived from the original on November 5, 2019. Retrieved November 5, 2019. ^ "Brewster Kahle: Universal Access to All Knowledge – The Long Now". longnow.org. 45'47". Archived from the original on October 20, 2016. Retrieved October 18, 2016. ^ "Members". Archived from the original on June 13, 2010. Retrieved April 24, 2011. International Internet Preservation Consortium. Netpreserve.org ^ "MTV Online: Main Page – Wayback Machine". Wayback Machine. May 12, 1996. Archived from the original on May 12, 1996. Retrieved December 16, 2016. ^ "Infoseek Guide – Wayback Machine". Wayback Machine. May 12, 1996. Archived from the original on May 12, 1996. Retrieved December 16, 2016. ^ Kahle, Brewster (August 7, 2012). "Over 1,000,000 Torrents of Downloadable Books, Music, and Movies" Archived August 13, 2014, at the Wayback Machine. Internet Archive Blogs. ^ a b Ernesto (August 7, 2012). "Internet Archive Starts Seeding 1,398,875 Torrents". TorrentFreak. Archived from the original on August 8, 2012. ^ "Hot List for bt1.us.archive.org (Updated August 7 2012, 7:31 pm PDT)" Archived August 3, 2012, at the Wayback Machine. US Cluster. Internet Archive. ^ B, Sarah (November 6, 2013). "Part of Internet Archive building badly burned in early morning fire". Archived from the original on January 31, 2017. Retrieved February 11, 2017. ^ Alexander, Kurtis (November 16, 2013). "Internet Archive's S.F. office damaged in fire". San Francisco Chronicle. Archived from the original on December 12, 2013. ^ "Fire Update: Lost Many Cameras, 20 Boxes. No One Hurt". Internet Archive Blogs. November 6, 2013. Archived from the original on November 7, 2013. ^ Shu, Catherine (November 6, 2013). "Internet Archive Seeking Donations To Rebuild Its Fire-Damaged Scanning Center". TechCrunch. Archived from the original on July 6, 2017. ^ a b Kahle, Brewster (November 29, 2016). "Help Us Keep the Archive Free, Accessible, and Reader Private". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on May 21, 2017. Retrieved December 2, 2016. ^ Johnson, Tim (December 1, 2016). "Donald Trump scares Internet Archive into moving to Canada". McClatchy DC. Archived from the original on December 2, 2016. Retrieved December 2, 2016. ^ Rothschild, Mike (December 2, 2016). "The Internet Archive Is Moving to Canada to Protect Itself from Trump". Attn. Archived from the original on December 3, 2016. Retrieved December 2, 2016. ^ Locker, Melissa (July 3, 2018). "The Internet Archive is helping these artists get inspired by digital history". Fast Company. Archived from the original on December 29, 2018. Retrieved December 29, 2018. ^ "Jenny Odell - Neo-Surreal". The Photographers' Gallery. May 30, 2018. Archived from the original on September 27, 2019. Retrieved September 27, 2019. ^ "Internet Archive evacuated due to bomb threat". msn.com. Archived from the original on July 14, 2019. Retrieved July 14, 2019. ^ "Boston Public Library transfers sound archives collection to Internet Archive for digitization, preservation, and public access". Boston Public Library. October 11, 2017. Retrieved December 4, 2020. ^ "Trent University donates 250,000 books to be digitized by Internet Archive as part of Bata Library transformation". Trent University. September 13, 2018. Retrieved December 4, 2020. ^ Seltzer, Rick (October 21, 2020). "A new home online for closed college libraries?". Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved December 4, 2020. ^ Matt Enis (May 2, 2019). "Internet Archive Expands Partnerships for Open Libraries Project". Archived from the original on May 3, 2019. Retrieved May 3, 2019. ^ Green, Heather (February 28, 2002). "A Library as Big as the World". Business Week Online. Archived from the original on June 1, 2002. ^ Thelwall, Mike; Vaughan, Liwen (Spring 2004). "A fair history of the Web? Examining country balance in the Internet Archive" (PDF). Library & Information Science Research. 26 (2): 162–176. doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2003.12.009. Archived (PDF) from the original on September 24, 2015. ^ a b Rossi, Alexis (October 25, 2013). "Fixing Broken Links on the Internet". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on November 7, 2014. Retrieved December 29, 2013. ^ "Web.archive.org directory". Archived from the original on January 3, 2012. Retrieved March 2, 2014. ^ "Internet Archive Forums: What is the oldest page on the Wayback Machine?". archive.org. Archived from the original on March 11, 2019. Retrieved October 6, 2019. ^ a b Goel, Vinay (October 23, 2016). "Defining Web pages, Web sites and Web captures". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on December 9, 2018. Retrieved December 9, 2018. ^ "430 Billion Web Pages Saved. ... Help Us Do More! | Internet Archive Blogs". blog.archive.org. Archived from the original on July 7, 2018. Retrieved June 10, 2018. ^ Graham, Mark (September 17, 2020). "Cloudflare and the Wayback Machine, joining forces for a more reliable Web". Internet Archive Blogs. Retrieved September 17, 2020. ^ "archive-it.org". archive-it.org. Archived from the original on April 14, 2013. Retrieved April 13, 2013. ^ Truman, Gail (January 2016). Web Archiving Environmental Scan. Harvard Library Report. ^ "What is the Difference between the General Archive (sometimes called the Wayback Machine) and Archive-It?" Archived October 15, 2016, at the Wayback Machine. Archive-It How to FAQ. Archive-It. – via Jira.com. ^ "About Archive-It". Archive-It. Archived from the original on February 21, 2014. Retrieved March 3, 2014. ^ Archives, in; Data; Education; Archive, Internet; September 22nd, Libraries |; Comment, 2020 Leave a. "The Internet Archive Will Digitize & Preserve Millions of Academic Articles with Its New Database, "Internet Archive Scholar"". Open Culture. Retrieved September 23, 2020. ^ a b c Hoffelder, Nate (July 9, 2013). "Internet Archive Now Hosts 4.4 Million eBooks, Sees 15 Million eBooks Downloaded Each Month" Archived November 10, 2013, at the Wayback Machine. The Digital Reader. ^ "Bulk Access to OCR for 1 Million Books" Archived December 6, 2008, at the Wayback Machine. Open Library Blog. November 24, 2008. ^ a b "Book search winding down". MSDN Live Search Blog. May 23, 2008. Archived from the original on August 20, 2008. ^ Books imported from Google have a metadata tag of scanner:google for searching purposes. The archive provides a link to Google for PDF copies, but also maintains a local PDF copy, which is viewable under the "All Files: HTTPS" link. As all the other books in the collection, they also provide OCR text and images in open formats, particularly DjVu, which Google Books doesn't offer. ^ a b Brewster Kahle, Aaron Swartz memorial at the Internet Archive Archived June 29, 2015, at the Wayback Machine, 2013-01-24, via The well-prepared mind Archived August 14, 2014, at the Wayback Machine, via S.I.Lex Archived August 8, 2014, at the Wayback Machine. ^ a b "Internet Archive BookReader". archive.org. Archived from the original on June 21, 2019. Retrieved June 21, 2019. ^ Kaplan, Jeff (December 10, 2010). "New BookReader!". blog.archive.org. Archived from the original on June 21, 2019. Retrieved June 21, 2019. ^ "Internet Archive Search". Archived from the original on September 12, 2016. ^ "FAQ on Controlled Digital Lending (CDL)". National Writers Union. Retrieved February 15, 2019. ^ Gonsalves, Antone (December 20, 2006). "Internet Archive Claims Progress Against Google Library Initiative". InformationWeek. Archived from the original on October 14, 2007. ^ "The Open Library Makes Its Online Debut". The Wired Campus. Chronicle of Higher Education. July 19, 2007. Archived from the original on September 30, 2007. ^ "Search Inside" Archived October 20, 2013, at the Wayback Machine (feature). OpenLibrary.org. ^ Internet Archive (June 25, 2011). "In-Library eBook Lending Program Expands to 1,000 Libraries" Archived August 13, 2014, at the Wayback Machine. Internet Archive Blogs. June 25, 2011. ^ Flood, Alison (January 22, 2019). "Internet Archive's ebook loans face UK copyright challenge". The Guardian. ^ a b Brandom, Russell (June 1, 2020). "Publishers sue Internet Archive over Open Library ebook lending". The Verge. Retrieved June 1, 2020. ^ For example, the Princeton Theological Seminary Library has described how it and other academic libraries are digitization partners with the Internet Archive: "Partnering with the Internet Archive". Princeton Theological Seminary Library. Retrieved December 4, 2020. ^ "Internet Archive Search: collection:(texts)". archive.org. Retrieved December 4, 2020. ^ "The MIT Press". archive.org. Retrieved June 27, 2020. ^ Hanamura, Wendy (May 30, 2017). "MIT Press Classics Available Soon at Archive.org". blog.archive.org. Retrieved June 27, 2020. For more than eighty years, MIT Press has been publishing acclaimed titles in science, technology, art and architecture. Now, thanks to a new partnership between the Internet Archive and MIT Press, readers will be able to borrow these classics online for the first time. ^ Green, Alex (December 1, 2019). "New Takes on Academic Publishing: Three university presses find new ways to keep up with a changing market". Publishers Weekly. Retrieved June 27, 2020. Since she became director [of the MIT Press] in 2015, there's little that Brand hasn't reenvisioned at the press. In 2017, the press partnered with the Internet Archive to make its deep backlist available for free at libraries, resurrecting books that had not seen the light of day in generations. ^ Freeland, Chris (May 21, 2018). "Internet Archive awarded grant from Arcadia Fund to digitize university press collections". blog.archive.org. Retrieved June 27, 2020. Internet Archive has received a $1 million dollar grant from Arcadia – a charitable fund of Lisbet Rausing and Peter Baldwin – to digitize titles from university press collections to make them available via controlled digital lending. ^ Albanese, Andrew (May 25, 2018). "Internet Archive Lands Grant to Digitize and Lend University Press Collections". Publishers Weekly. Retrieved June 27, 2020. ^ For example: "hdl.loc.gov/loc.gdc/scd0001.00198115083", retrieved November 25, 2020 ; "hdl.loc.gov/loc.gdc/scd0001.00060921933", retrieved November 25, 2020 ; "hdl.loc.gov/loc.gdc/scd0001.00060927248", retrieved November 25, 2020 ; "hdl.loc.gov/loc.gdc/scd0001.00001740908", retrieved November 25, 2020 ; "hdl.loc.gov/loc.gdc/scd0001.00027740005", retrieved November 25, 2020 . ^ "External Web Sites – Finding E-books: A Guide – Library of Congress Bibliographies, Research Guides, and Finding Aids (Virtual Programs & Services, Library of Congress)". www.loc.gov. Retrieved November 25, 2020. The Internet Archive includes the full text of more than 2.5 million e-books, including e-books supplied by the Library of Congress. Books can be read online or downloaded and read in a variety of formats. E-books from the Internet Archive can also be found through Open Library, an Internet Archive initiative devoted to texts. And: "Devices and Formats – Finding E-books: A Guide – Library of Congress Bibliographies, Research Guides, and Finding Aids (Virtual Programs & Services, Library of Congress)". www.loc.gov. Retrieved November 25, 2020. Library of Congress publications are available for free download to the Kindle from the Internet Archive. ... The iPad can be used as an e-reader via apps such as iBooks, which support both ePub (.epub) and PDF (.pdf) formats. Both formats are available from the Internet Archive. ^ a b Pritchard, Will (August 18, 2017). "How The Great 78 Project is saving half a million songs from obscurity". The Vinyl Factory. Archived from the original on November 7, 2017. Retrieved November 2, 2017. ^ Tirpack, Alex (June 3, 2009). "Warren Zevon live shows hit the web, possible film in the works". Rolling Stone. Archived from the original on February 2, 2013. ^ "Image". Internet Archive. Archived from the original on September 25, 2020. Retrieved October 12, 2020. ^ "NASA Images" (archive). Internet Archive. Archived from the original on November 11, 2012. Retrieved April 13, 2013. ^ Boswell, Wendy (October 21, 2006). "Download free music at the Internet Archive". Lifehacker. Archived from the original on May 5, 2012. The Internet Archive has a ginormous collection of free, downloadable music in their NetLabels category ... ^ Fowler, Geoffrey A.; Hagey, Keach (September 18, 2012). "Let's Go to the Videotape: Nonprofit Offers News Clips". The Wall Street Journal Online. Archived from the original on April 24, 2013. (subscription required) ^ Kahle, Brewster (September 17, 2012). "Launch of TV News Search & Borrow with 350,000 Broadcasts". Internet Archive Blogs. Archived from the original on August 13, 2014. ^ Brownell, Brett; Benjy Hansen-Brandy (May 22, 2014). "Meet the People Behind the Wayback Machine, One of Our Favorite Things About the Internet". Mother Jones. Archived from the original on June 7, 2014. Retrieved June 7, 2014. ^ "Internet Archive founder turns to new information storage device – the book". The Guardian. August 1, 2011. Archived from the original on August 22, 2012. Brewster Kahle, the man behind a project to file every webpage, now wants to gather one copy of every published book ^ Library of Congress Copyright Office (November 27, 2006). "Exemption to Prohibition on Circumvention of Copyright Protection Systems for Access Control Technologies". Federal Register. 71 (227): 68472–68480. Archived from the original on November 1, 2007. Retrieved October 21, 2007. Computer programs and video games distributed in formats that have become obsolete and that require the original media or hardware as a condition of access, when circumvention is accomplished for the purpose of preservation or archival reproduction of published digital works by a library or archive. A format shall be considered obsolete if the machine or system necessary to render perceptible a work stored in that format is no longer manufactured or is no longer reasonably available in the commercial marketplace. ^ Library of Congress Copyright Office (October 28, 2009). "Exemption to Prohibition on Circumvention of Copyright Protection Systems for Access Control Technologies" (PDF). Federal Register. 27 (206): 55137–55139. Archived (PDF) from the original on December 2, 2009. Retrieved December 17, 2009. ^ Library of Congress Copyright Office (July 27, 2010). "Exemption to Prohibition on Circumvention of Copyright Protection Systems for Access Control Technologies". Federal Register. 75 (143): 43825–43839. Archived from the original on June 27, 2015. ^ Robertson, Adi (October 25, 2013). "The Internet Archive puts Atari games and obsolete software directly in your browser". The Verge. Archived from the original on October 27, 2013. ^ Ohlheiser, Abby (January 5, 2015). "You can now play nearly 2,400 MS-DOS video games in your browser". Washington Post. Archived from the original on January 7, 2015. Retrieved January 8, 2015. ^ Each New Boot a Miracle Archived January 9, 2015, at the Wayback Machine by Jason Scott (December 23, 2014) ^ Graft, Kris (March 5, 2015). "Saving video game history begins right now". Gamasutra. Archived from the original on March 7, 2015. Retrieved March 5, 2015. ^ Lu, Kathy (January 12, 2015). "Time suck alert: 'Pac-Man' among thousands of MS-DOS games available for free". The Kansas City Star. Archived from the original on December 20, 2016. Retrieved December 7, 2016. ^ O'Neil, Lauren (January 7, 2015). "90's kids rejoice as Internet Archive releases 2,300 MS-DOS games for free – Your Community". CBCNEWS. Archived from the original on October 17, 2016. Retrieved December 7, 2016. ^ Campbell, Ian Carlos (November 19, 2020). "The Internet Archive is now preserving Flash games and animations". The Verge. Retrieved November 19, 2020. ^ Stutz, Michael (March 28, 2007). "Linux to help the Library of Congress save American history". Linux.com. The Linux foundation. Archived from the original on October 23, 2017. ^ Strozniak, Peter (December 18, 2015). "Death of a Credit Union: Internet Archive FCU Voluntarily Liquidates". Credit Union Times. Archived from the original on October 6, 2019. Retrieved October 6, 2019. ^ "Difficult Times at our Credit Union". Internet Archive Blogs. November 24, 2015. Archived from the original on June 16, 2019. Retrieved October 6, 2019. ^ Leeds, Jeff; Mayshark, Jesse Fox (December 1, 2005). "Wrath of Deadheads stalls a Web crackdown". The New York Times. Archived from the original on May 8, 2015. ^ Lesh, Phil (November 30, 2005). "An Announcement from Phil Lesh". Hotline (blog). PhilLesh.net. Archived from the original on July 15, 2007. ^ Broache, Anne (May 7, 2008). "FBI rescinds secret order for Internet Archive records". CNet. Archived from the original on May 15, 2008. ^ Nakashima, Ellen (May 8, 2008). "FBI Backs Off From Secret Order for Data After Lawsuit". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on September 6, 2008. ^ Crocker, Andrew (December 1, 2016). "Internet Archive Received National Security Letter with FBI Misinformation about Challenging Gag Order". Electronic Frontier Foundation. Archived from the original on December 13, 2016. ^ Kahle, Brewster (January 17, 2012). "12 Hours Dark: Internet Archive vs. Censorship". Internet Archive Blogs. Archived from the original on August 13, 2014. ^ "Open Content Alliance". opencontentalliance.org. Archived from the original on April 10, 2013. Retrieved April 13, 2013. ^ Frank, Allegra (August 8, 2016). "Nintendo takes down Nintendo Power collection from Internet Archive after noticing it". Polygon. Archived from the original on August 11, 2016. ^ a b "Indian ISP Ban on Wayback Machine Lifted? Confirmation Awaited". Guiding Tech. August 9, 2017. Retrieved April 12, 2020. ^ Kelion, Leo (August 9, 2017). "Bollywood blocks the Internet Archive". BBC. Archived from the original on August 6, 2018. Retrieved January 1, 2018. ^ "Turkey restores access to Google Drive after blocking cloud storage services". Turkey Blocks. Archived from the original on September 24, 2017. Retrieved October 10, 2016. ^ "Turkey Country Report | Freedom on the Net 2017". freedomhouse.org. November 14, 2017. Archived from the original on December 27, 2018. Retrieved December 26, 2018. ^ Lee, Timothy B. (March 28, 2020). "Internet Archive offers 1.4 million copyrighted books for free online". Ars Technica. Retrieved April 10, 2020. ^ a b Freeland, Chris (March 30, 2020). "Internet Archive responds: Why we released the National Emergency Library". Internet Archive Blogs. Retrieved May 26, 2020. ^ Cohen, Noam (April 20, 2020). "The National Emergency Library and Its Discontents". Wired. Retrieved April 20, 2020. ^ Flood, Alison (March 30, 2020). "Internet Archive accused of using Covid-19 as 'an excuse for piracy'". The Guardian. Retrieved May 26, 2020. ^ Freeland, Chris (March 24, 2020). "Announcing a National Emergency Library to Provide Digitized Books to Students and the Public". Internet Archive Blogs. Retrieved May 26, 2020. ^ Hurst-Wahl, Jill (April 20, 2020). "Digitization 101: The National Emergency Library". Digitization 101. Retrieved May 26, 2020. ^ Flood, Alison (March 30, 2020). "Internet Archive accused of using Covid-19 as 'an excuse for piracy'". The Guardian. Retrieved March 30, 2020. ^ Dwyer, Colin (March 30, 2020). "Authors, Publishers Condemn The 'National Emergency Library' As 'Piracy'". NPR. Retrieved March 30, 2020. ^ Grady, Constance (April 2, 2020). "Why authors are so angry about the Internet Archive's Emergency Library". Vox. Retrieved April 2, 2020. ^ "Internet Archive Controversy". Lotus. May 2, 2020. Retrieved May 25, 2020. ^ Lee, Timothy (June 11, 2020). "Internet Archive ends "emergency library" early to appease publishers". Ars Technica. Retrieved June 14, 2020. ^ Dwyer, Colin (June 3, 2020). "Publishers Sue Internet Archive For 'Mass Copyright Infringement'". NPR. Retrieved October 16, 2020. ^ Harris, Elizabeth (June 11, 2020). "Internet Archive Will End Its Program for Free E-Books". NY Times. Retrieved June 15, 2020. ^ Albanese, Andrew (September 1, 2020). "Judge sets tentative schedule for Internet Archive copyright case". Publishers Weekly. Retrieved September 7, 2020. ^ Levy, Karyne (April 29, 2014). "These Are The Ceramic Action Figures For The Heroes Of The Internet". Business Insider. Insider Inc. Retrieved July 12, 2019. ^ "Internet Archive is a treasure trove of material for artists - SFChronicle.com". sfchronicle.com. August 11, 2017. Archived from the original on August 1, 2019. Retrieved August 1, 2019. ^ "The Internet Archive's 2019 Artists in Residency Exhibition | Internet Archive Blogs". Archived from the original on July 31, 2019. Retrieved August 1, 2019. Further reading[edit] Library resources about Internet Archive Resources in your library Resources in other libraries Kahle, Brewster (November 1996). "Archiving the Internet". Scientific America. Kahle, Brewster (November 6, 2013). "Scanning Center Fire—Please Help Rebuild". Internet Archive Blogs. Lepore, Jill (January 26, 2015). "The Cobweb". The New Yorker. Ringmar, Erik (April 10, 2008). "Liberate and Disseminate". Times Higher Education Supplement. External links[edit] Wikimedia Commons has media related to Internet Archive. Official website v t e Internet Archive Universal access to all knowledge Projects Wayback Machine PetaBox Open Library NASA Images Open Content Alliance Archive-It SFlan Partners & Collaborators Bibliotheca Alexandrina Library of Congress American Libraries Canadian Libraries Biodiversity Heritage Library Sloan Foundation Collections Lists of Internet Archive's collections Image NASA Images USGS Maps Texts American Libraries Canadian Libraries Children's Library RECAP US Federal Court Documents Microfilm US Government Documents Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Collected texts of Simon Schwartzman Audio Live Music Archive LibriVox Video NASA Images FedFlix Democracy Now! Marion Stokes The Internet Archive Software Collection Open Educational Resources People Brewster Kahle David Rumsey Rick Prelinger Jason Scott Software Heritrix v t e E-books Formats ePub FictionBook CBR/CBZ Kindle File Format Mobipocket PDF Plain text IBA Reading Devices Amazon Kindle Barnes & Noble Nook Bookeen Elonex ebook enTourage eDGe Hanlin eReader iPad iriver Story Kobo eReader Onyx Boox Plastic Logic Reader PocketBook eReader Rocket eBook SoftBook Smartphones Tablets Tolino Software Adobe Acrobat Adobe Digital Editions Aldiko Apple Books (iBooks) Aquafadas Blio Bluefire Reader Calibre FBReader Foliate Google Play Books Kindle app Kitabu Kobo Lector Lektz Lucifox Microsoft Reader MuPDF Okular OverDrive Media Console Snapplify STDU Viewer Sumatra PDF Editing ABBYY FineReader AbiWord Adobe InDesign Adobe RoboHelp Aquafadas Atlantis Word Processor Booktype Calibre Calligra Author eXeLearning Help & Manual HelpNDoc iBooks Author iStudio Publisher LaTeX LibreOffice MadCap Flare Oxygen XML Editor PagePlus Pages QuarkXPress Scrivener Sigil Writer2epub Vendors Commercial Apple Books Store Amazon Kindle Store Baen Free Library Barnes & Noble Booktrack Feedbooks Google Play Jarir.com Kobo Bookstore Sony Reader Store Smashwords Noncommercial Faded Page HathiTrust Internet Archive Project Gutenberg Australia Canada Wikisource Related topics Academic journal publishing reform Braille e-book Comparison of e-book readers Comparison of iOS e-book reader software Comparison of Android e-book reader software E-book lending Electronic publishing iBooks Author Conference International Digital Publishing Forum Kindle single OPDS Reflowable document Self-publishing Semantic publishing v t e Tor onion services List Category Web directories The Hidden Wiki Search engines Ahmia DuckDuckGo* Cliqz Grams MetaGer Searx Startpage.com* Torch (search engine) News BBC News* Deutsche Welle* The Daily Stormer* DeepDotWeb Independent Media Center The Intercept* The New York Times* File storage and peer-to-peer file sharing BTDigg Freedom Hosting Free Haven Project KickassTorrents The Pirate Bay* Email and instant messaging Bitmessage.ch Keybase Riseup Tor Mail TorChat SIGAINT ProtonMail* Social media and forums 8chan Dark0de Dread facebookcorewwwi.onion HackBB The Hub Financial Blockchain.info* Helix Darknet markets Agora AlphaBay Atlantis Black Market Reloaded Dream Market Evolution The Farmer's Market Hansa Sheep Marketplace Silk Road TheRealDeal Russian Anonymous Marketplace Tor Carding Forum Utopia Document archives Archive.today* Doxbin Internet Archive* Sci-Hub* Nonprofit organizations Courage Foundation Freedom of the Press Foundation La Quadrature du Net Telecomix Government Central Intelligence Agency Whistleblowing BuggedPlanet Filtrala GlobaLeaks Ljost NawaatLeaks ProPublica* SecureDrop WildLeaks WikiLeaks* Pornography Childs Play Lolita City Playpen Pornhub* Tor .onion domain Tor2web *Also on the normal web Authority control BNF: cb170635025 (data) LCCN: n2001062537 NLA: 54356800 NLI: 002103469 SUDOC: 219991014 VIAF: 123343900 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n2001062537 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Internet_Archive&oldid=996812258" Categories: 1996 establishments in California 501(c)(3) organizations Access to Knowledge movement American digital libraries Charities based in California E-book suppliers Foundations based in the United States History of the Internet Internet Archive projects Internet properties established in 2001 Mass digitization Non-profit organizations based in San Francisco Online archives of the United States Organizations established in 1996 Public libraries in California Richmond District, San Francisco Sound archives Web archiving initiatives 1996 in San Francisco Tor onion services Hidden categories: Webarchive template wayback links Pages containing links to subscription-only content Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata Use mdy dates from January 2020 Coordinates not on Wikidata All articles with vague or ambiguous time Vague or ambiguous time from December 2020 Wikipedia articles in need of updating from December 2020 All Wikipedia articles in need of updating Wikipedia articles in need of updating from May 2020 All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from December 2020 Articles containing potentially dated statements from March 2014 All articles containing potentially dated statements Articles containing potentially dated statements from July 2013 Articles containing potentially dated statements from November 2008 Articles containing potentially dated statements from November 2013 Commons category link from Wikidata Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLI identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Articles containing video clips Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Meta-Wiki Languages العربية Asturianu Azərbaycanca বাংলা Bân-lâm-gú भोजपुरी Български Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français Galego 한국어 Hrvatski Ilokano Bahasa Indonesia Italiano עברית ქართული Қазақша Kiswahili Latina Lumbaart Magyar മലയാളം Bahasa Melayu Nederlands 日本語 Nordfriisk Norsk bokmål Norsk nynorsk ਪੰਜਾਬੀ Polski Português Română Русский Scots Simple English Slovenčina Slovenščina Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska தமிழ் తెలుగు ไทย Türkçe Українська اردو Tiếng Việt 吴语 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 28 December 2020, at 19:00 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1387 ---- Category:Pages using Sister project links with default search - Wikipedia Help Category:Pages using Sister project links with default search From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search This is a tracking category. It is used to build and maintain lists of pages—primarily for the sake of the lists themselves and their use in article and category maintenance. It is not part of the encyclopedia's categorization scheme. Pages in this category do not have explicit link arguments, nor Wikidata sitelinks, so fall back to default search. These search links need to be checked for utility. More information: This category is hidden on its member pages—unless the corresponding user preference is set. These categories are used to track, build and organize lists of pages needing "attention en masse" (for example, pages using deprecated syntax), or that may need to be edited at someone's earliest convenience. These categories also serve to aggregate members of several lists or sub-categories into a larger, more efficient list (discriminated by classifications). Pages in category "Pages using Sister project links with default search" The following 200 pages are in this category, out of approximately 4,473 total. This list may not reflect recent changes (learn more). (previous page) (next page)A Acres Green, Colorado Air Force Academy, Colorado Alamosa East, Colorado Allenspark, Colorado Applewood, Colorado Arboles, Colorado Aspen Park, Colorado Atlantic Beach, Florida Atwood, Colorado B 20-point agreement Agra Alan Kay Alternative medicine American football Anarcho-capitalism Andrew Johnson Art Atom Bakersfield, California Bezoar Bible Billy Ray Cyrus Bukit Tinggi, Pahang Bullying Bunraku Business software Cambodia Catherine of Aragon Ceramic art Charles de Gaulle Charles, Prince of Wales Chowder Cloud Corduroy Database Diana, Princess of Wales Disease Edmonton Elephant Ethiopia Federation of Malaya Francisco Franco Freezing point depression osmometer Freida Pinto Girolamo Savonarola Guy Kawasaki Habitat for Humanity Hans Christian Andersen Hanukkah History of Goa Horror film Hudson River Human nutrition Huygens (spacecraft) Iași International law International Year of Astronomy Internet J. Smeaton Chase James Fenimore Cooper James II of England James Webb Space Telescope Jean-Jacques Rousseau Jews John Tyler Johor Kananaskis Country Kareem Abdul-Jabbar Keeping Up with the Kardashians Kylie Jenner Labuan Lady Bird (film) Laziness Max Weber Mercury (planet) Meteorite Mozilla localizations Nazi Germany Nicolaus Copernicus Nineteen Eighty-Four Padua Pahang Pebble Beach, California Perak Persepolis Pershing Square (Los Angeles) Planetary science Presidency of Andrew Johnson Rainwater harvesting Ray Bradbury Robert Schumann Sabah Same-sex marriage Sarawak Saudi Arabia Software South Korea Stata Super Mario (disambiguation) Swarm intelligence Taji Liundi The Federalist Papers Thorpe Park Time Tom Smothers Tongs Uncanny valley Vienna Wikimania Wikimedia Foundation World War II Yogurt Battlement Mesa, Colorado Berkley, Colorado Byers, Colorado C 69 Hesperia 2015 Tanzanian general election Abubakar Asenga Adolf Mkenda Asus ZenFone 7 Babu Tale Big Hill Lake BlackBoxTV Father of the Pride Frisian Lakes Harmonize (musician) Hasan al-Askari Highland Road Park Observatory HIV/AIDS Konde Music Worldwide Marine Services Company Limited Medical Stores Department Mr Puaz National Stadium (Tanzania) Nedy Music Nina Simone discography Presidency of James Madison Presidency of James Monroe Priscus Tarimo Rana Hamir Singh The Norliss Tapes Tony E. Valenzuela Transport in Tanzania Uganda National Mosque United World College East Africa Calligraphy William Camden Campinas Campion, Colorado Candy Cardiac arrest Cascade-Chipita Park, Colorado Castlewood, Colorado Chesapeake, Virginia Cimarron Hills, Colorado Clifton, Colorado Coal Creek, Boulder County, Colorado Cottonwood, Colorado D Derby, Colorado Diarrhea Dillingham Census Area, Alaska Downieville-Lawson-Dumont, Colorado E Eagle-Vail, Colorado El Centro, California El Jebel, Colorado Eldora, Colorado Eldorado Springs, Colorado F Fine art Fort Garland, Colorado Franktown, Colorado Fruitvale, Colorado G Genesee, Colorado Gleneagle, Colorado Grand View Estates, Colorado Gunbarrel, Colorado H Heritage Hills, Colorado Homicide I Indian Hills, Colorado Iztaccihuatl K Ken Caryl, Colorado Kittredge, Colorado L Lahaina, Hawaii Laporte, Colorado Leadville North, Colorado Lincoln Park, Colorado Louviers, Colorado M Madison, Wisconsin Maitland, Florida Martinez, California Meridian, Colorado Metropolitan statistical area Military Mount Shasta, California N Air Panama Albany, New York Alcohol Alexander Hamilton Alicia Keys Amana Colonies American Airlines (previous page) (next page) Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Pages_using_Sister_project_links_with_default_search&oldid=995955440" Hidden categories: Hidden categories Tracking category for Sister project links Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Category Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Add links This page was last edited on 23 December 2020, at 19:34 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1395 ---- Victor Kiernan - Wikipedia Victor Kiernan From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia   (Redirected from V. G. Kiernan) Jump to navigation Jump to search This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages) This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Victor Kiernan" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (January 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) This article includes a list of general references, but it remains largely unverified because it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (January 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) Edward Victor Gordon Kiernan (4 September 1913 – 17 February 2009) was a British Marxist historian and a member of the Communist Party Historians Group. He was recognised as one of the most wide-ranging of global historians. While his middle name came from one of British imperialism's greatest heroes, General 'Chinese' Gordon of Khartoum, he emerged as one of Britain's foremost ideological warriors against empire.[1] Contents 1 Life 2 Intellectual legacy 3 Kiernan and Urdu poetry 4 Marriages 5 Selected works/articles 5.1 See also 6 References 7 External links Life[edit] Born in Ashton-on-Mersey, a southern district of Manchester, Kiernan was one of three children born to Ella née Young and John Edward Kiernan, who served as a translator of Spanish and Portuguese for the privately owned Manchester Ship Canal. His family came from a congregationalist, non-conformist religious tradition that he later suggested played a role in his socialist formation and that of many of the Communist Party Historians Group founded in 1946. A scholarship student at the Manchester Grammar School, Kiernan developed a passion for the classics, as he added ancient Greek and Latin to the modern European languages he had already learned at home. Propelled with three new scholarships, he went on to Trinity College, Cambridge where he achieved a double-starred First in History (B.A.,1934; M.A., 1937). Recruited by Guy Burgess during a time of radical ferment among Cambridge students, Kiernan joined the Communist Party in 1934. He found his radicalism subsequently reinforced by what he regarded as the treachery of Britain's elites. Perhaps the greatest influence on Kiernan was Maurice Dobb. A lecturer in economics at Cambridge, he had joined the Communist Party of Great Britain in 1920 and was open with his students about his communist beliefs. Kiernan later wrote: "We had no time then to assimilate Marxist theory more than very roughly; it was only beginning to take root in England, although it had one remarkable expounder at Cambridge in Maurice Dobb." In 1938, as a junior fellow, Kiernan departed for Bombay in to continue his political activities and to teach at the Sikh National College and Aitchison College in Lahore, India (now Pakistan). Shortly after his arrival he married the theatre activist and childhood friend of Indira Nehru, Shanta Gandhi. Though they remained friends, they split up when Kiernan returned to Cambridge in 1946 to complete his Fellowship. Spurned by both Cambridge and Oxford, Kiernan was offered a lectureship in 1948 at the University of Edinburgh, thanks to the intervention of the distinguished historian Richard Pares. In 1970, Kiernan was given a Personal Chair in Modern History; a position he held until his retirement in 1977. Having joined the CPGB in 1934, he finally left in 1959, chiefly in disgust at the suppression of the Hungarian Revolution of 1956, after which, he said: "I waited in hopes the party might improve. It didn't." In 1993 at the age of 80, Kiernan produced Shakespeare: Poet and Citizen a book he had been working on since 1947. A second volume, Eight Tragedies of Shakespeare, followed in 1996. His final book, Horace: Poetics and Politics appeared in 1999. Kiernan died peacefully in his sleep, aged 95, in Stow, Scotland. Intellectual legacy[edit] Kiernan made immense contributions to the post-war flowering of British Marxist historiography that transformed the understanding of social history. Seeking escape paths from a congealing Stalinism, this intellectual movement grew from several figures among them - E.P. Thompson, Christopher Hill, Rodney Hilton, Kiernan and Eric Hobsbawm. Brash and confident in wielding the best of the British Left's cultural arsenal, they welcomed open-ended dialogue with non-Marxist traditions. Some of this dialogue was on display in the journal Past & Present, a journal of social history that became the most prestigious in the English-speaking world. Kiernan wrote a major essay in 1952 for the first issue of the journal ("Evangelicalism and the French Revolution"), produced several landmark articles, and later served on its editorial board from 1973 to 1983. He also contributed to New Left Review throughout the journal's transitions. While Thompson, Hill and Hilton were rooted in English social history, Kiernan and Hobsbawm practised a historical craft with more global aspirations. Kiernan's distinctive contributions included the study of elites in history, the mythologies of imperialism, the folklore of capitalism and conservatism, and literature and social change. Kiernan and Urdu poetry[edit] While steeped in Western literature and the classical heritage of Horace, Kiernan called for an appreciation of Urdu poetry, as he translated works from its literary golden age spanning from Ghalib (1796-1869) to Allama Iqbal (1877-1938) to Faiz Ahmad Faiz (1911-1984). He elevated writers from the East who had been largely banished by guardians of the Western canon and then overlooked by stylish post-modern literary figures looking for more transgressive exemplars of literary craft. Marriages[edit] He was married twice: to the Indian theatre director, dancer and playwright Shanta Gandhi (Bollywood actress Dina Pathak's sister), from 1938 to 1946; and to the Canadian scholar Heather Massey, from 1984 until his death. Selected works/articles[edit] The Dragon and St. George: Anglo-Chinese relations 1880-1885 (1939) British diplomacy in China, 1880 to 1885 (1939) Poems from Iqbal, Translation (1955) The revolution of 1854 in Spanish history (1966) The lords of human kind. European attitudes towards the outside world in the Imperial Age (1969) Marxism and imperialism: studies (1974) America, the new imperialism: from white settlement to world hegemony (1978) State & society in Europe, 1550-1650 (1980) European empires from conquest to collapse, 1815-1960 (1982) The duel in European history: honour and the reign of aristocracy (1988) History, classes and nation-states (edited and introduced by Harvey J. Kaye (1988) Tobacco: A History (1991) Shakespeare, poet and citizen (1993) Imperialism and its contradictions (edited & introduced by Harvey J. Kaye; 1995) Eight tragedies of Shakespeare: a Marxist study (1996) Colonial empires and armies 1815-1960 (1982, 1998) Horace: poetics and politics (1999) See also[edit] History & humanism: essays in honour of V.G. Kiernan (edited by Owen Dudley Edwards; 1977) Across time and continents: a tribute to Victor G. Kiernan (edited by Prakash Karat; 2003). ISBN 81-87496-34-7. References[edit] ^ Tariq Ali (20 February 2009). "Victor Kiernan: Marxist historian, writer and linguist who challenged the tenets of Imperialism". The Independent. External links[edit] Obituary by Eric Hobsbawm Profile in The Hindu Obituary in The Scotsman Review of America, the new imperialism Obituary by James Dunkerley, History Workshop Journal, 69, (Spring, 2010). Obituary in The Times, 14 May 2009 Authority control BIBSYS: 90851787 BNE: XX1037055 BNF: cb120249725 (data) CANTIC: a12058117 GND: 122769864 ISNI: 0000 0001 1459 7459 LCCN: n80046671 NKC: jn19990004317 NLA: 36153410 NTA: 068191111 SELIBR: 327993 SUDOC: 028409272 VIAF: 9860778 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n80046671 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Victor_Kiernan&oldid=960686546" Categories: 1913 births 2009 deaths Alumni of Trinity College, Cambridge Academics of the University of Edinburgh British Marxists Fellows of Trinity College, Cambridge British Marxist historians People educated at Manchester Grammar School People from Sale, Greater Manchester Communist Party of Great Britain members 20th-century British historians Hidden categories: Use dmy dates from May 2017 Use British English from May 2017 Articles needing additional references from January 2013 All articles needing additional references Articles lacking in-text citations from January 2013 All articles lacking in-text citations Articles with multiple maintenance issues Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CANTIC identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Català Español Nederlands Русский Edit links This page was last edited on 4 June 2020, at 10:10 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1405 ---- Roman consul - Wikipedia Roman consul From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Political office in ancient Rome Ancient Rome This article is part of a series on the politics and government of ancient Rome Periods Roman Kingdom 753–509 BC Roman Republic 509–27 BC Roman Empire 27 BC – AD 395 Principate 27 BC – AD 284 Dominate AD 284–641 Western AD 395–476 Eastern AD 395–1453 Timeline Roman Constitution Constitution of the Kingdom Constitution of the Republic Constitution of the Empire Constitution of the Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Executive magistrates Precedent and law Roman law Ius Imperium Mos maiorum Collegiality Auctoritas Roman citizenship Cursus honorum Senatus consultum Senatus consultum ultimum Assemblies Centuriate Curiate Plebeian Tribal Ordinary magistrates Consul Praetor Quaestor Promagistrate Aedile Tribune Censor Governor Extraordinary magistrates Corrector Dictator Magister equitum Consular tribune Rex Triumviri Decemviri Titles and honours Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Praeses Praefectus Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Other countries v t e A consul held the highest elected political office of the Roman Republic (509 to 27 BC), and ancient Romans considered the consulship the highest level of the cursus honorum (an ascending sequence of public offices to which politicians aspired). Each year, the citizens of Rome elected two consuls to serve jointly for a one-year term. The consuls alternated in holding fasces each month when both were in Rome and a consul's imperium extended over Rome and all its provinces. There were two consuls in order to create a check on the power of any individual. After the establishment of the Empire (27 BC), the consuls became mere symbolic representatives of Rome's republican heritage and held very little power and authority, with the Emperor acting as the supreme authority. Contents 1 History 1.1 Under the Republic 1.2 Under the Empire 2 Powers and responsibilities 2.1 Republican duties 2.1.1 Civil sphere 2.1.2 Military sphere 2.1.3 Abuse prevention 2.1.4 Governorship 2.1.5 Appointment of the dictator 2.2 Imperial duties 3 Consular dating 4 Epigraphy 5 Lists of Roman consuls 6 See also 7 References 8 Bibliography History[edit] Under the Republic[edit] After the legendary expulsion of the last King, Tarquin the Proud, a harsh ruler at the end of the Roman Kingdom, most of the powers and authority of the king were ostensibly given to the newly instituted consulship. This change in leadership came about when the king's son, Sextus Tarquinius, raped the wives and daughters of powerful Roman nobles. A group of nobles led by Lucius Junius Brutus, with the support of the Roman Army, expelled Tarquinius and his family from Rome in 509 BC. Originally, consuls were called praetors ("leader"), referring to their duties as the chief military commanders. By at least 300 BC the title of Consul became commonly used.[1] Ancient writers usually derive the title consul from the Latin verb consulere, "to take counsel", but this is most likely a later gloss of the term,[2] which probably derives—in view of the joint nature of the office—from con- and sal-, "get together" or from con- and sell-/sedl-, "sit down together with" or "next to".[3] In Greek, the title was originally rendered as στρατηγὸς ὕπατος, strategos hypatos ("the supreme general"), and later simply as ὕπατος.[2] The consul was believed by the Romans to date back to the traditional establishment of the Republic in 509 BC, but the succession of consuls was not continuous in the 5th century BC. During the 440s, the office was quite often replaced with the establishment of the Consular Tribunes, who were elected whenever the military needs of the state were significant enough to warrant the election of more than the two usual consuls.[4] These remained in place until the office was abolished in 367/366 BC and the consulship was reintroduced.[5] Consuls had extensive powers in peacetime (administrative, legislative and judicial), and in wartime often held the highest military command. Additional religious duties included certain rites which, as a sign of their formal importance, could only be carried out by the highest state officials. Consuls also read auguries, an essential step before leading armies into the field. Two consuls were elected each year, serving together, each with veto power over the other's actions, a normal principle for magistracies. They were elected by the Comitia Centuriata, which had an aristocratic bias in its voting structure which only increased over the years from its foundation.[citation needed] However, they formally assumed powers only after the ratification of their election in the older Comitia Curiata, which granted the consuls their imperium by enacting a law, the "lex curiata de imperio". If a consul died during his term (not uncommon when consuls were in the forefront of battle) or was removed from office, another would be elected by the Comitia Centuriata to serve the remainder of the term as consul suffectus ("suffect consul"). A consul elected to start the year—called a consul ordinarius ("ordinary consul")—held more prestige than a suffect consul, partly because the year would be named for ordinary consuls (see consular dating). According to tradition, the consulship was initially reserved for patricians and only in 367 BC did plebeians win the right to stand for this supreme office, when the Lex Licinia Sextia provided that at least one consul each year should be plebeian. The first plebeian consul, Lucius Sextius, was elected the following year. Nevertheless, the office remained largely in the hands of a few families as, according to Gelzer[who?], only fifteen novi homines - "new men" with no consular background - were elected to the consulship until the election of Cicero in 63 BC.[6] Modern historians have questioned the traditional account of plebeian emancipation during the early Republic (see Conflict of the Orders), noting for instance that about thirty percent of the consuls prior to Sextius had plebeian, not patrician, names. It is possible that only the chronology has been distorted, but it seems that one of the first consuls, Lucius Junius Brutus, came from a plebeian family.[7] Another possible explanation is that during the 5th century social struggles, the office of consul was gradually monopolized by a patrician elite.[8] During times of war, the primary qualification for consul was military skill and reputation, but at all times the selection was politically charged. With the passage of time, the consulship became the normal endpoint of the cursus honorum, the sequence of offices pursued by the ambitious Roman who chose to pursue political power and influence. When Lucius Cornelius Sulla regulated the cursus by law, the minimum age of election to consul became, in effect, 42 years of age.[9] Beginning in the late Republic, after finishing a consular year, a former consul would usually serve a lucrative term as a proconsul, the Roman Governor of one of the (senatorial) provinces. The most commonly chosen province for the proconsulship was Cisalpine Gaul. It would not be uncommon for the patrician consulars of the early republic to intersperse public office with agricultural labour.[10] In Cicero’s words: in agris erant tum senatores, id est senes:[11] ‘In those days senators—that is, seniors—would live on their farms’. This practice was obsolete by the 2nd century. Under the Empire[edit] Flavius Anastasius (consul of the Eastern Roman Empire for AD 517) in consular garb, holding a sceptre and the mappa, a piece of cloth used to signal the start of chariot races at the Hippodrome. Ivory panel from his consular diptych. On the left: Emperor Honorius on the consular diptych of Anicius Petronius Probus (406) On the right: Consular diptych of Constantius III (a co-emperor with Honorius in 421), produced for his consulate of the Western Roman Empire in 413 or 417 Although throughout the early years of the Principate, the consuls were still formally elected by the Comitia Centuriata, they were de facto nominated by the princeps.[12] As the years progressed, the distinction between the Comitia Centuriata and the Comitia Tributa (which elected the lower magisterial positions) appears to have disappeared, and so for the purposes of the consular elections, there came to be just a single "assembly of the people" which elected all the magisterial positions of the state, while the consuls continued to be nominated by the princeps.[13] The imperial consulate during the period of the High Empire (until the 3rd century) was an important position, albeit as the method through which the Roman aristocracy could progress through to the higher levels of imperial administration – only former consuls could become consular legates, the proconsuls of Africa and Asia, or the urban prefect of Rome.[14] It was a post that would be occupied by a man halfway through his career, in his early thirties for a patrician, or in his early forties for most others.[12] Emperors frequently appointed themselves, or their protégés or relatives, consuls, even without regard to the age requirements. For example, Emperor Honorius was given the consulship at birth. Cassius Dio states that Caligula intended to make his horse Incitatus consul, but was assassinated before he could do so.[15] The need for a pool of men to fill the consular positions forced Augustus to remodel the suffect consulate, allowing more than the two elected for the ordinary consulate.[12] During the reigns of the Julio-Claudians, the ordinary consuls who began the year usually relinquished their office mid-year, with the election for the suffect consuls occurring at the same time as that for the ordinary consuls. During reigns of the Flavian and Antonine emperors, the ordinary consuls tended to resign after a period of four months, and the elections were moved to 12 January of the year in which they were to hold office. Election of the consuls were transferred to the Senate during the Flavian or Antonine periods, although through to the 3rd century, the people were still called on to ratify the Senate's selections.[16] The proliferation of suffect consuls through this process, and the allocation of this office to homines novi tended, over time, to devalue the office.[14] However, the high regard placed upon the ordinary consulate remained intact, as it was one of the few offices that one could share with the emperor, and during this period it was filled mostly by patricians or by individuals who had consular ancestors.[12] If they were especially skilled or valued, they may even have achieved a second (or rarely, a third) consulate. Prior to achieving the consulate, these individuals already had a significant career behind them, and would expect to continue serving the state, filling in the post upon which the state functioned.[17] Consequently, holding the ordinary consulship was a great honor and the office was the major symbol of the still relatively republican constitution. Probably as part of seeking formal legitimacy, the break-away Gallic Empire had its own pairs of consuls during its existence (260–274). The list of consuls for this state is incomplete, drawn from inscriptions and coins. By the end of the 3rd century, much had changed. The loss of many pre-consular functions and the gradual encroachment of the equites into the traditional senatorial administrative and military functions, meant that senatorial careers virtually vanished prior to their appointment as consuls.[17] This had the effect of seeing a suffect consulship granted at an earlier age, to the point that by the 4th century, it was being held by men in their early twenties, and possibly younger, without the significant political careers behind them that was normal previously.[17] As time progressed, second consulates, usually ordinary, became far more common than had been the case during the first two centuries, while the first consulship was usually a suffect consulate. Also, the consulate during this period was no longer just the province of senators – the automatic awarding of a suffect consulship to the equestrian praetorian prefects (who were given the ornamenta consularia upon achieving their office) allowed them to style themselves cos. II when they were later granted an ordinary consulship by the emperor.[17] All this had the effect of further devaluing the office of consul, to the point that by the final years of the 3rd century, holding an ordinary consulate was occasionally left out of the cursus inscriptions, while suffect consulships were hardly ever recorded by the first decades of the 4th century.[17] One of the reforms of Constantine I (r. 306–337) was to assign one of the consuls to the city of Rome, and the other to Constantinople. Therefore, when the Roman Empire was divided into two halves on the death of Theodosius I (r. 379–395), the emperor of each half acquired the right of appointing one of the consuls—although on occasion an emperor did allow his colleague to appoint both consuls for various reasons. The consulship, bereft of any real power, continued to be a great honor, but the celebrations attending it – above all the chariot races – had come to involve considerable expense, which only a few citizens could afford, to the extent that part of the expense had to be covered by the state.[18] In the 6th century, the consulship was increasingly sparsely given, until it was allowed to lapse under Justinian I (r. 527–565): the western consulship lapsed in 534, with Decius Paulinus the last holder, and the consulship of the East in 541, with Anicius Faustus Albinus Basilius. Consular dating had already been abolished in 537, when Justinian introduced dating by the emperor's regnal year and the indiction.[19] In the eastern court, the appointment to consulship became a part of the rite of proclamation of a new emperor from Justin II (r. 565–578) on, and is last attested in the proclamation of the future Constans II (r. 641–668) as consul in 632.[20] In the late 9th century, Emperor Leo the Wise (r. 886–912) finally abolished consular dating with Novel 94. By that time, the Greek titles for consul and ex-consul, "hypatos" and "apo hypaton", had been transformed to relatively lowly honorary dignities.[21] In the west, the rank of consul was occasionally bestowed upon individuals by the Papacy. In 719, the title of Roman consul was offered by the Pope to Charles Martel, although he refused it.[22] About 853, Alfred the Great, then a child aged four or five, was made a Roman consul by the Pope. Powers and responsibilities[edit] Republican duties[edit] After the expulsion of the kings and the establishment of the Republic, all the powers that had belonged to the kings were transferred to two offices: that of the consuls and the Rex Sacrorum. While the Rex Sacrorum inherited the kings’ position as high priest of the state, the consuls were given the civil and military responsibilities (imperium). However, to prevent abuse of the kingly power, the imperium was shared by two consuls, each of whom could veto the other's actions. The consuls were invested with the executive power of the state and headed the government of the Republic. Initially, the consuls held vast executive and judicial power. In the gradual development of the Roman legal system, however, some important functions were detached from the consulship and assigned to new officers. Thus, in 443 BC, the responsibility to conduct the census was taken from the consuls and given to the censors. The second function taken from the consulship was their judicial power. Their position as chief judges was transferred to the praetors in 366 BC. After this time, the consul would only serve as judges in extraordinary criminal cases and only when called upon by decree of the Senate. Civil sphere[edit] For the most part, power was divided between civil and military spheres. As long as the consuls were in the pomerium (the city of Rome), they were at the head of government, and all the other magistrates, with the exception of the tribunes of the plebeians, were subordinate to them, but retained independence of office. The internal machinery of the Republic was under the consuls’ supervision. In order to allow the consuls greater authority in executing laws, the consuls had the right of summons and arrest, which was limited only by the right of appeal from their judgment. This power of punishment even extended to inferior magistrates. As part of their executive functions, the consuls were responsible for carrying into effect the decrees of the Senate and the laws of the assemblies. Sometimes, in great emergencies, they might even act on their own authority and responsibility. The consuls also served as the chief diplomat of the Roman state. Before any foreign ambassadors reached the Senate, they met with the consuls. The consul would introduce ambassadors to the Senate, and they alone carried on the negotiations between the Senate and foreign states. The consuls could convene the Senate, and presided over its meetings. Each consul served as president of the Senate for a month. They could also summon any of the three Roman assemblies (Curiate, Centuriate, and Tribal) and presided over them. Thus, the consuls conducted the elections and put legislative measures to the vote. When neither consul was within the city, their civic duties were assumed by the praetor urbanus. Each consul was accompanied in every public appearance by twelve lictors, who displayed the magnificence of the office and served as his bodyguards. Each lictor held a fasces, a bundle of rods that contained an axe. The rods symbolized the power of scourging, and the axe the power of capital punishment[citation needed]. When inside the pomerium, the lictors removed the axes from the fasces to show that a citizen could not be executed without a trial. Upon entering the Comitia Centuriata, the lictors would lower the fasces to show that the powers of the consuls derive from the people (populus romanus). Military sphere[edit] Outside the walls of Rome, the powers of the consuls were far more extensive in their role as commanders-in-chief of all Roman legions. It was in this function that the consuls were vested with full imperium. When legions were ordered by a decree of the Senate, the consuls conducted the levy in the Campus Martius. Upon entering the army, all soldiers had to take their oath of allegiance to the consuls. The consuls also oversaw the gathering of troops provided by Rome's allies.[23] Within the city a consul could punish and arrest a citizen, but had no power to inflict capital punishment. When on campaign, however, a consul could inflict any punishment he saw fit on any soldier, officer, citizen, or ally. Each consul commanded an army, usually two legions strong, with the help of military tribunes and a quaestor who had financial duties. In the rare case that both consuls marched together, each one held the command for a day respectively. A typical consular army was about 20,000 men strong and consisted of two citizen and two allied legions. In the early years of the Republic, Rome's enemies were located in central Italy, so campaigns lasted a few months. As Rome's frontiers expanded, in the 2nd century BC, the campaigns became lengthier. Rome was a warlike society, and very seldom did not wage war.[24] So the consul upon entering office was expected by the Senate and the People to march his army against Rome's enemies, and expand the Roman frontiers. His soldiers expected to return to their homes after the campaign with spoils. If the consul won an overwhelming victory, he was hailed as imperator by his troops, and could request to be granted a triumph. The consul could conduct the campaign as he saw fit, and had unlimited powers. However, after the campaign, he could be prosecuted for his misdeeds (for example for abusing the provinces, or wasting public money, as Scipio Africanus was accused by Cato in 205 BC). Abuse prevention[edit] Abuse of power by consuls was prevented with each consul given the power to veto his colleague. Therefore, except in the provinces as commanders-in-chief where each consul's power was supreme, the consuls could only act not against each other's determined will. Against the sentence of one consul, an appeal could be brought before his colleague, which, if successful, would see the sentence overturned. In order to avoid unnecessary conflicts, only one consul would actually perform the office's duties every month and could act without direct interference. In the next month, the consuls would switch roles with one another. This would continue until the end of the consular term. Another point which acted as a check against consuls was the certainty that after the end of their term they would be called to account for their actions while in office. There were also three other restrictions on consular power. Their term in office was short (one year); their duties were pre-decided by the Senate; and they could not stand again for election immediately after the end of their office. Usually a period of ten years was expected between consulships. Governorship[edit] Main article: Roman governor After leaving office, the consuls were assigned by the Senate to a province to administer as governor. The provinces to which each consul was assigned were drawn by lot and determined before the end of his consulship. Transferring his consular imperium to proconsular Imperium, the consul would become a proconsul and governor of one (or several) of Rome's many provinces. As a proconsul, his imperium was limited to only a specified province and not the entire Republic. Any exercise of proconsular imperium in any other province was illegal. Also, a proconsul was not allowed to leave his province before his term was complete or before the arrival of his successor. Exceptions were given only on special permission of the Senate. Most terms as governor lasted between one and five years. Appointment of the dictator[edit] In times of crisis, when Rome's territory was in immediate danger, a dictator was appointed by the consuls for a period of no more than six months, after the proposition of the Senate.[25] While the dictator held office, the imperium of the consuls was subordinate to the dictator. Imperial duties[edit] After Augustus became the first Roman emperor in 27 BC with the establishment of the principate, the consuls lost most of their powers and responsibilities under the Roman Empire. Though still officially the highest office of the state, with the emperor's superior imperium they were merely a symbol of Rome's republican heritage. One of the two consular positions was often occupied by emperors themselves and eventually became reserved solely for the Emperor. However, the imperial consuls still maintained the right to preside at meetings of the Senate, exercising this right at the pleasure of the Emperor[citation needed]. They partially administered justice in extraordinary cases, and presented games in the Circus Maximus and all public solemnities in honor of the Emperor at their own expense. After the expiration of their offices, the ex-consuls (proconsuls) went on to govern one of the provinces that were administered by the Senate. They usually served proconsular terms of three to five years[citation needed]. Consular dating[edit] Roman dates were customarily kept according to the names of the two consuls who took office that year, much like a regnal year in a monarchy. For instance, the year 59 BC in the modern calendar was called by the Romans "the consulship of Caesar and Bibulus", since the two colleagues in the consulship were Gaius Julius Caesar and Marcus Calpurnius Bibulus — although Caesar dominated the consulship so thoroughly that year that it was jokingly referred to as "the consulship of Julius and Caesar".[26] The date the consuls took office varied: from 222 BC to 153 BC they took office 15 March, and from 153 BC onwards it was on 1 January.[27] The practice of dating years ab urbe condita (from the supposed foundation date of Rome) was less frequently used. In Latin, the ablative absolute construction is frequently used to express the date, such as "M. Messalla et M. Pupio Pisone consulibus", translated literally as "Marcus Messalla and Marcus Pupius Piso being the consuls", which appears in Caesar's De Bello Gallico. Consular Dating Key 509–479 BC: 1 September–29 August (August had only 29 days in Ancient Rome) 478–451 BC: 1 August–31 July 449–403 BC: 13 December–12 December 402–393 BC: 1 October–29 September (September had 29 days) 392–329 BC: 1 July–29 June (29 days) 222–154 BC: 15 March–14 March 153–46 BC: 1 January–29 December (29 days) [28] Epigraphy[edit] An antoninianus commemorating the third consulate ("COS III") of the emperor Philip (248 AD). The word consul is abbreviated as COS.[29] The disappearance of the N is explained by the fact that in Classical Latin an N before a fricative is pronounced as a nasalization of the previous vowel (meaning consul is pronounced /kõːsul/). Also, consul is pronounced [ko:sul], as shown in ancient writing, "COSOL", whereas the classical spelling (consul) seems like an etymological reminder of the nasal consonant.[30] If a senator held the consulship twice then: COS becomes COS II; thrice becomes COS III, etc. Lists of Roman consuls[edit] For a complete list of Roman consuls, see: List of Roman consuls List of undated Roman consuls List of consuls designate See also[edit] Look up consul in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. Constitution of the Roman Republic – The norms, customs, and written laws, which guided the government of the Roman Republic French Consulate References[edit] ^ Lintott, Andrew (2004). The Constitution of the Roman Republic. Oxford University Press. p. 104. ISBN 0198150687. ^ a b Kübler, B. (1900). "Consul". Realencyclopädie der Classischen Altertumswissenschaft. Band IV, Halbband 7, Claudius mons-Cornificius. pp. 1112–1138. ^ Gizewski, Christian (2013). "Consul(es)". Brill's New Pauly. Brill Online. Archived from the original on 10 November 2013. Retrieved 2 July 2013. ^ Forsythe, Gary (2005). A Critical History of Early Rome: From Prehistory to the First Punic War. University of California Press. p. 236. ISBN 0520226518. ^ Forsythe, Gary (2005). A Critical History of Early Rome: From Prehistory to the First Punic War. University of California Press. p. 237. ISBN 0520226518. ^ Wirszubzki, Ch. Libertas as a Political Idea at Rome during the Late Republic and Early Principate. Reprint. Cambridge University Press, 1960, p. 15. ^ Oxford Classical Dictionary, 3rd ed., Hornblower, S. and Spawforth, A. edd., s.v. Iunius Brutus, Lucius ^ T. J. Cornell, The Beginnings of Rome, chapter 10.4. ^ Telford, L. (2014). Sulla: A Dictator Reconsidered. United Kingdom: Pen & Sword Military, pg. 216 ^ Jehne, M. (2011) ‘The rise of the consular as a social type in the third and second centuries BC’ in Beck et al. (eds.) Consuls and Res Publica (Cambridge) 212 ^ Cic. Sen. 56 ^ a b c d Bagnall et al. 1987, p. 1. ^ Bury, John B, A History of the Roman Empire from its Foundation to the Death of Marcus Aurelius (1893), pg. 29 ^ a b Bagnall et al. 1987, pp. 1–2. ^ Cassius Dio, Roman History, 59:14:7 ^ Michael Gagarin, Elaine Fantham; The Oxford Encyclopedia of Ancient Greece and Rome, Volume 1 (2010), pgs. 296-297 ^ a b c d e Bagnall et al. 1987, p. 2. ^ Kazhdan, Alexander, ed. (1991), Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium, Oxford University Press, p. 527, ISBN 978-0-19-504652-6 ^ Kazhdan, Alexander, ed. (1991), Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium, Oxford University Press, pp. 526–527, ISBN 978-0-19-504652-6 ^ Kazhdan, Alexander, ed. (1991), Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium, Oxford University Press, p. 526, ISBN 978-0-19-504652-6 ^ Kazhdan, Alexander, ed. (1991), Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium, Oxford University Press, pp. 526, 963–964, ISBN 978-0-19-504652-6 ^ e. The Frankish Kingdom. 2001. The Encyclopedia of World History Archived 2009-03-06 at the Wayback Machine ^ Polybius - Histories book VI ^ War and society in the Roman World ed. Rich & Shipley ^ Arthur Keaveney, in Sulla, the Last Republican (Routledge, 1982, 2nd edition 2005), p. 162ff online, discusses the appointment of a dictator in regard to Sulla, in which case exceptions were made. ^ Suetonius' Lives of the Caesars: Julius Caesar Chapter XX. ^ E.J. Bickerman, Chronology of the Ancient World (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1968), p. 64 ^ Robert Maxwell Ogilvie, Commentary on Livy, books 1–5, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1965, pp. 404, 405. ^ (in French) Mireille Cébeillac-Gervasoni, Maria Letizia Caldelli, Fausto Zevi, Épigraphie latine. Ostie : cent inscriptions dans leur contexte, Armand Colin, 2006, ISBN 2-200-21774-9, p. 34. ^ (in French) Pierre Monteil, Éléments de phonétique et de morphologie du latin, Nathan, 1970, p. 75. Bibliography[edit] Bagnall, Roger S; Cameron, Alan; Schwartz, Seth R; Worp, Klaus Anthony (1987). Consuls of the later Roman Empire. Volume 36 of Philological monographs of the American Philological Association. London: Scholar Press. Burgess, R. W. (1989). "Consuls and Consular Dating in the Later Roman Empire". Phoenix (Review). 43 (2): 143–157. doi:10.2307/1088213. Beck, Hans; Duplá, Antonio; Jehne, Martin; et al., eds. (2011). Consuls and Res Publica: Holding High Office in the Roman Republic. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-139-49719-0. v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Roman_consul&oldid=993636066" Categories: Roman consuls Ancient Roman titles Hidden categories: Webarchive template wayback links Articles with French-language sources (fr) Articles with short description Short description matches Wikidata Articles containing Ancient Greek (to 1453)-language text All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from March 2009 All articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases from May 2016 Articles with unsourced statements from December 2018 Articles with unsourced statements from June 2010 AC with 0 elements Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Languages Afrikaans Alemannisch العربية Asturianu Azərbaycanca Беларуская Български Bosanski Brezhoneg Català Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français Frysk Galego 한국어 Հայերեն Hrvatski Ido Bahasa Indonesia Interlingua Italiano עברית ქართული Kurdî Latina Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Македонски Bahasa Melayu Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Norsk nynorsk Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча پنجابی Plattdüütsch Polski Português Română Русский Scots සිංහල Simple English Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Tagalog Татарча/tatarça Türkçe Українська اردو Tiếng Việt Winaray 吴语 Zazaki 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 11 December 2020, at 17:33 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1411 ---- Technological history of the Roman military - Wikipedia Technological history of the Roman military From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Technological history of the Roman military" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (October 2011) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) Part of a series on the Military of ancient Rome 753 BC – AD 476 Structural history Army Unit types and ranks Decorations and punishments Legions Auxilia Generals Navy Fleets Admirals Campaign history Wars and battles Technological history Military engineering Castra Siege engines Triumphal arches Roads Political history   Strategy and tactics Infantry tactics Frontiers and fortifications Limes Limes Britannicus Antonine Wall Hadrian's Wall Saxon Shore Limes Germanicus Alb Limes Lauter Valley Limes Lower Germanic Limes Main Limes Neckar-Odenwald Limes Upper Germanic-Rhaetian Limes Wetterau Limes Danube–Iller–Rhine Limes Norican Limes Claustra Alpium Iuliarum Pannonian Limes Limes Alutanus Limes Moesiae Trajan's Wall Anastasian Wall Limes Sarmatiae Limes Arabicus Limes Tripolitanus Limes Mauretaniae  Ancient Rome portal •  War portal v t e The technology history of the Roman military covers the development of and application of technologies for use in the armies and navies of Rome from the Roman Republic to the fall of the Western Roman Empire. The rise of Hellenism and the Roman Republic are generally seen as signalling the end of the Iron Age in the Mediterranean. Roman iron-working was enhanced by a process known as carburization. The Romans used the better properties in their armaments, and the 1,300 years of Roman military technology saw radical changes. The Roman armies of the early empire were much better equipped than early republican armies. Metals used for arms and armor primarily included iron, bronze, and brass. For construction, the army used wood, earth, and stone. The later use of concrete in architecture was widely mirrored in Roman military technology, especially in the application of a military workforce to civilian construction projects.[1] Contents 1 Origins and development 1.1 New materials 1.2 Mining 2 Roman implementation of technology 3 See also 4 Notes 5 References 6 External links Origins and development[edit] Much of what is described as typically Roman technology, as opposed to that of the Greeks, comes directly from the Etruscan civilization, which was thriving to the North when Rome was just a small kingdom. The Etruscans had invented the stone arch, and used it in bridges as well as buildings. Some later Roman technologies were taken directly from Greek civilization. After the absorption of the ancient Greek city states into the Roman Republic in 146 BC, the highly advanced Greek technology began to spread across many areas of Roman influence and supplement the Empire. This included the military advances that the Greeks had made, as well as all the scientific, mathematical, political and artistic developments. New materials[edit] However, the Romans made many significant technological advances, such as the invention of hydraulic cement and concrete. They used such new materials to great advantage in their structures, many of which survive to this day, like their masonry aqueducts, such as the Pont du Gard, and buildings, such as the Pantheon and Baths of Diocletian in Rome. Their methods were recorded by such luminaries as Vitruvius and Frontinus for example, who wrote handbooks to advise fellow engineers and architects. Romans knew enough history to be aware that widespread technological change had occurred in the past and brought benefits, as shown for example by Pliny the Elder's Naturalis Historia. That tradition continued as the empire grew in size and absorbed new ideas. Romans thought of themselves as practical, so small-scale innovation was common (such as the development of the ballista into the polybolos or repeating ballista). The traditional view is that their reliance on a plentiful slave labour force and a lack of a patent or copyright system have both been cited as reasons that there was little social or financial pressure to automate or reduce manual tasks. However, this view is being challenged by new research that shows they did indeed innovate, and on a wide scale. Thus the watermill had been known to the Greeks, but it was the Romans who developed their efficient utilisation. The set of mills at Barbegal in southern France were worked by a single aqueduct, which drove no fewer than 16 overshot mills built into the side of a hill. They probably were built by the army and supplied flour to a wide region. Floating mills were also used to exploit fast flowing rivers. Pont du Gard Mining[edit] The Romans also used water power in an unexpected way during mining operations. It's known from the writings of Pliny the Elder that they exploited the alluvial gold deposits of north-west Spain soon after the conquest of the region in 25 BC using large-scale hydraulic mining methods. The spectacular gold mine at Las Medulas was worked by no fewer than seven long aqueducts cut into the surrounding mountains, the water being played directly onto the soft auriferous ore. The outflow was channelled into sluice boxes, and the heavier gold collected on rough pavements. They also developed many deep mines, such as those for copper at Rio Tinto, where Victorian mining developments exposed the much earlier workings. Dewatering machines, such as Archimedean screws and reverse overshot water wheels, were found in situ, one of which is on show at the British Museum. Another fragmentary example was recovered from the Roman gold mine at Dolaucothi in west Wales, and is preserved at the National Museum of Wales in Cardiff. The army were at the forefront of development of gold mines, since the metal was imperial property, and developed the Dolaucothi mines from the outset by establishing a fort there that was known as Luentinum. They had the expertise to build the infrastructure of aqueducts and reservoirs, as well as control production. Panoramic view of Las Médulas The period in which technological progress was fastest and greatest was during the 2nd century and 1st century BC, which was the period in which Roman political and economic power greatly increased. By the 2nd century, Roman technology appears to have peaked. Roman implementation of technology[edit] The Romans advanced military technology significantly, and implemented it on a massive scale. From a few early models of ballista from Greek city-states the Romans adopted and improved the design, eventually issuing one to every century in the legions. To facilitate this organization, an engineering corps was developed. An officer of engineers, or praefectus fabrum, is referenced in armies of the Late Republic, but this post is not verifiable in all accounts and may have simply been a military advisor on the personal staff of a commanding officer.[2] There were legion architects (whose rank is yet unknown), who were responsible for the construction of war machines. Ensuring that constructions were level was the job of the libratores, who would also launch missiles and other projectiles (on occasion) during battle.[3] The engineering corps was in charge of massive production, frequently prefabricating artillery and siege equipment to facilitate its transportation [4] See also[edit] Roman military engineering Roman aqueducts Roman technology Sanitation in ancient Rome Notes[edit] ^ John W. Humphrey, John P. Oleson and Andrew N. Sherwood; Greek and Roman Technology: A sourcebook ^ Keppie 1984: 99 ^ Le Bohec, p. 52 ^ Goldsworthy, p. 144 References[edit] Primary sources Frontinus Pliny the elder Vitruvius External links[edit] Roman Swords in the Republic and After, [1] v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Technological_history_of_the_Roman_military&oldid=868168269" Categories: Ancient Roman military technology Hidden categories: Articles needing additional references from October 2011 All articles needing additional references Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Add links This page was last edited on 10 November 2018, at 12:39 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1446 ---- Abraham Cowley - Wikipedia Abraham Cowley From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search 17th-century English writer Abraham Cowley, portrait by Peter Lely Abraham Cowley (/ˈkuːli/;[1] 1618 – 28 July 1667) was an English poet born in the City of London late in 1618. He was one of the leading English poets of the 17th century, with 14 printings of his Works published between 1668 and 1721.[2] Contents 1 Early life and career 2 Royalist in exile 3 Return to England 4 References 5 Sources 6 External links Early life and career[edit] Cowley's father, a wealthy citizen, who died shortly before his birth, was a stationer. His mother was wholly given to works of devotion, but it happened that there lay in her parlour a copy of The Faerie Queene. This became the favourite reading of her son, and he had read it twice before he was sent to school.[3] As early as 1628, that is, in his tenth year, he composed his Tragicall History of Piramus and Thisbe, an epic romance written in a six-line stanza, a style of his own invention. It is not too much to say that this work is the most astonishing feat of imaginative precocity on record; it is marked by no great faults of immaturity, and possesses constructive merits of a very high order. Two years later the child wrote another and still more ambitious poem, Constantia and Philetus, being sent about the same time to Westminster School. Here he displayed extraordinary mental precocity and versatility, and wrote in his thirteenth year the Elegy on the Death of Dudley, Lord Carlton. These three poems of considerable size, and some smaller ones, were collected in 1633, and published in a volume entitled Poetical Blossoms, dedicated to Lambert Osbaldeston, the head master of the school, and prefaced by many laudatory verses by schoolfellows.[3] The author at once became famous, although he had not, even yet, completed his fifteenth year. His next composition was a pastoral comedy, entitled Love's Riddle, a marvellous production for a boy of sixteen, airy, correct and harmonious in language, and rapid in movement. The style is not without resemblance to that of Randolph, whose earliest works, however, were at that time only just printed.[3] In 1637 Cowley went up to Trinity College, Cambridge,[4] where he "betook himself with enthusiasm to the study of all kinds of learning, and early distinguished himself as a ripe scholar".[3] Portraits of Cowley, attributed to William Faithorne and Stephen Slaughter, are in Trinity College's collection.[5] It was about this time that he composed his scriptural epic on the history of King David, one book of which still exists in the Latin original, the rest being superseded in favour of an English version in four books, called the Davideis, which were published after his death. The epic deals with the adventures of King David from his boyhood to the smiting of Amalek by Saul, where it abruptly closes.[3] Abraham Cowley In 1638 Love's Riddle and a Latin comedy, the Naufragium Joculare, were printed, and in 1641 the passage of Prince Charles through Cambridge gave occasion to the production of another dramatic work, The Guardian, which was acted before the royal visitor with much success. During the civil war this play was privately performed at Dublin, but it was not printed till 1650. It is bright and amusing, in the style common to the "sons" of Ben Jonson, the university wits who wrote more for the closet than the public stage.[3] Royalist in exile[edit] The learned quiet of the young poet's life was broken up by the Civil War; he warmly espoused the royalist side. He became a fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge, but was ejected by the Parliamentarians in 1643. He made his way to Oxford, where he enjoyed the friendship of Lord Falkland, and was tossed, in the tumult of affairs, into the personal confidence of the royal family itself.[3] After the battle of Marston Moor he followed the queen to Paris, and the exile so commenced lasted twelve years. This period was spent almost entirely in the royal service, "bearing a share in the distresses of the royal family, or labouring in their affairs. To this purpose he performed several dangerous journeys into Jersey, Scotland, Flanders, the Netherlands, or wherever else the king's troubles required his attendance. But the chief testimony of his fidelity was the laborious service he underwent in maintaining the constant correspondence between the late king and the queen his wife. In that weighty trust he behaved himself with indefatigable integrity and unsuspected secrecy; for he ciphered and deciphered with his own hand the greatest part of all the letters that passed between their majesties, and managed a vast intelligence in many other parts, which for some years together took up all his days, and two or three nights every week."[3] In spite of these labours he did not refrain from literary industry. During his exile he met with the works of Pindar, and determined to reproduce their lofty lyric passion in English.[3] However, Cowley misunderstood Pindar's metrical practice and therefore his reproduction of the Pindaric Ode form in English does not accurately reflect Pindar's poetics. But despite this problem, Cowley's use of iambic lines of irregular length, pattern, and rhyme scheme was very influential and is still known as English "Pindarick" Ode, or Irregular Ode. One of the most famous odes written after Cowley in the Pindaric tradition is Wordsworth's "Ode: Intimations of Immortality".[citation needed] During this same time, Cowley occupied himself in writing a history of the Civil War (which did not get published in full until 1973). In the preface to his 1656 Poems, Cowley mentioned that he had completed three books of an epic poem on the Civil War, but had left it unfinished after the First Battle of Newbury when the Royalist cause began to lose significant ground. In the preface Cowley indicated that he had destroyed all copies of the poem, but this was not precisely the truth. In 1697, twelve years after Cowley's death, a shortened version of the first book of the poem, called A Poem on the Late Civil War was published. It was assumed that the rest of the poem had indeed been destroyed or lost until the mid-20th century when scholar Allan Pritchard discovered the first of two extant manuscript copies of the whole poem among the Cowper family papers. Thus, the three completed books of Cowley's great (albeit unfinished) English epic, The Civill Warre (otherwise spelled "The Civil War"), was finally published in full for the first time in 1973.[6] In 1647 a collection of his love verses, entitled The Mistress, was published, and in the next year a volume of wretched satires, The Four Ages of England, was brought out under his name, with the composition of which he had nothing to do. In spite of the troubles of the times, so fatal to poetic fame, his reputation steadily increased, and when, on his return to England in 1656, he published a volume of his collected poetical works, he found himself without a rival in public esteem. This volume included the later works already mentioned, the Pindarique Odes, the Davideis, the Mistress and some Miscellanies. Among the latter are to be found Cowley's most vital pieces. This section of his works opens with the famous aspiration: "What shall I do to be for ever known, And make the coming age my own?" It contains elegies on Wotton, Vandyck, Falkland, William Hervey and Crashaw, the last two being among Cowley's finest poems, brilliant, sonorous and original; the amusing ballad of The Chronicle, giving a fictitious catalogue of his supposed amours; various gnomic pieces; and some charming paraphrases from Anacreon. The Pindarique Odes contain weighty Lines and passages, buried in irregular and inharmonious masses of moral verbiage. Not more than one or two are good throughout, but a full posy of beauties may easily be culled from them. The long cadences of the Alexandrines with which most of the strophes close, continued to echo in English poetry from Dryden down to Gray, but the Odes themselves, which were found to be obscure by the poet's contemporaries, immediately fell into disesteem.[3] The Mistress was the most popular poetic reading of the age, and is now the least read of all Cowley's works. It was the last and most violent expression of the amatory affectation of the 17th century, an affectation which had been endurable in Donne and other early writers because it had been the vehicle of sincere emotion, but was unendurable in Cowley because in him it represented nothing but a perfunctory exercise, a mere exhibition of literary calisthenics. He appears to have been of a cold, or at least of a timid, disposition; in the face of these elaborately erotic volumes, we are told that to the end of his days he never summoned up courage to speak of love to a single woman in real life. The "Leonora" of The Chronicle is said to have been the only woman he ever loved, and she married the brother of his biographer, Sprat.[3] Return to England[edit] Soon after his return to England he was seized in mistake for another person, and only obtained his liberty on a bail of £1000. In 1658 he revised and altered his play of The Guardian, and prepared it for the press under the title of The Cutter of Coleman Street, but it did not appear until 1661. Late in 1658 Oliver Cromwell died, and Cowley took advantage of the confusion of affairs to escape to Paris, where he remained until the Restoration brought him back in Charles's train. He published in 1663 Verses upon several occasions, in which The Complaint is included.[3] He is also known for having provided the earliest reference to coca in English literature, in a poem called "A legend of coca" in his 1662 collection of poems Six Books of Plants.[7] Abraham Cowley's Chertsey house Cowley obtained permission to retire into the country; and through his friend, Lord St Albans, he obtained a property near Chertsey, where, devoting himself to botany and books, he lived in comparative solitude until his death. He took a practical interest in experimental science, and he was one of those advocating the foundation of an academy for the protection of scientific enterprise. Cowley's pamphlet on The Advancement of Experimental Philosophy, 1661, immediately preceded the foundation of the Royal Society; to which Cowley, in March 1667, at the suggestion of John Evelyn, addressed an ode. He died in the Porch House, in Chertsey, in consequence of having caught a cold while superintending his farm-labourers in the meadows late on a summer evening. On 3 August, Cowley was buried in Westminster Abbey beside the ashes of Chaucer and Spenser, where in 1675 the Duke of Buckingham erected a monument to his memory. His Poemata Latina, including six books "Plantarum", were printed in 1668. The poetry of Cowley rapidly fell into neglect.[3] Frontispice and titlepage to a 1678 edition of the collected works of Abraham Cowley The works of Cowley were collected in 1668, when Thomas Sprat brought out an edition in folio, to which he prefixed a life of the poet. There were many reprints of this collection, which formed the standard edition till 1881, when it was superseded by Alexander Balloch Grosart's privately printed edition in two volumes, for the Chertsey Worthies library. The Essays have frequently been revived.[3] A Satire Against Separatists, printed in 1675, has been variously attributed to Cowley and to Peter Hausted.[citation needed] References[edit] ^ Alan Hager (ed.), The Age of Milton: An Encyclopedia of Major 17th-Century British and American Authors, ABC-CLIO, 2004, p. 89. ^ Oxford Dictionary of National Biography "Abraham Cowley" ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n  One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Gosse, Edmund (1911). "Cowley, Abraham". In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. 7 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 347–348. ^ "Cowley, Abraham (CWLY636A)". A Cambridge Alumni Database. University of Cambridge. ^ "Trinity College, University of Cambridge". BBC Your Paintings. Archived from the original on 11 May 2014. Retrieved 12 February 2018. ^ Ed. Allan Pritchard. Abraham Cowley, The Civil War, Toronto,(UTPress: 1973) p.3 ^ Peru. History of coca, "the divine plant" of the Incas; with an introductory account of the Incas, and of the Andean Indians of to-day. W. Golden Mortimer, M.D. Ed. J. H. Vail & Co, 1901. Abraham Cowley's poem "A Legend of Coca" : in chapter I An introduction to the history of coca, pp. 25–27. Sources[edit]  This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Cousin, John William (1910). A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature. London: J. M. Dent & Sons – via Wikisource. External links[edit] Wikimedia Commons has media related to Abraham Cowley. Wikisource has original works written by or about: Abraham Cowley Wikisource has the text of the 1885–1900 Dictionary of National Biography's article about Abraham Cowley. Wikiquote has quotations related to: Abraham Cowley Works by Abraham Cowley at Project Gutenberg Works by or about Abraham Cowley at Internet Archive Works by Abraham Cowley at LibriVox (public domain audiobooks) Essays by Abraham Cowley at Quotidiana.org Works of Abraham Cowley at Archive.org (pdf download) Samuel Johnson elevates Cowley for "easy poetry" v t e Metaphysical poetry Major poets John Donne (1572–1631) George Herbert (1593–1633) Andrew Marvell (1621–1678) Abraham Cowley (1618–1667) Robert Southwell (c. 1561–1595) Richard Crashaw (c. 1613–1649) Thomas Traherne (1636/1637–1674) Henry Vaughan (1622–1695) Minor poets Anne Bradstreet (c. 1612–1672) Thomas Carew (1595–1640) George Chapman (c. 1559–1634) John Hall (c. 1627–1656) Edward Herbert (1583–1648) Richard Leigh (1649-1728) Katherine Philips (1632–1664) Sir John Suckling (1609–1642) Edward Taylor (c. 1642–1729) Critics Samuel Johnson T. S. Eliot Authority control BNF: cb121973647 (data) CANTIC: a11565780 GND: 118677187 ISNI: 0000 0001 0927 3222 LCCN: n50018768 MBA: 280b42e9-a4ff-4b6f-8786-1834a18018ce NDL: 00620534 NKC: jn20000700334 NLA: 35031753 NLG: 120604 NLI: 000035442 NTA: 070405956 SELIBR: 182914 SNAC: w6ht37fm SUDOC: 030588413 Trove: 804491 VcBA: 495/5884 VIAF: 95254963 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n50018768 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Abraham_Cowley&oldid=990044084" Categories: 1618 births 1667 deaths English essayists Alumni of Trinity College, Cambridge People from the City of London People educated at Westminster School, London Burials at Westminster Abbey 17th-century English poets 17th-century male writers Male essayists English male poets Hidden categories: Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica with Wikisource reference Wikipedia articles incorporating text from the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata Use dmy dates from January 2020 EngvarB from January 2020 All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from May 2016 Wikipedia articles incorporating text from A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature Commons category link is on Wikidata Articles with Project Gutenberg links Articles with Internet Archive links Articles with LibriVox links Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CANTIC identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with MusicBrainz identifiers Wikipedia articles with NDL identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLG identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLI identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SNAC-ID identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with Trove identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikiquote Wikisource Languages العربية Cymraeg Deutsch Español Euskara فارسی Français Հայերեն Italiano עברית മലയാളം Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Norsk nynorsk Polski Português Română Русский Simple English Svenska Edit links This page was last edited on 22 November 2020, at 13:42 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1453 ---- Wikipedia:General disclaimer - Wikipedia Wikipedia:General disclaimer From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search General disclaimer Content disclaimer Legal disclaimer Medical disclaimer Risk disclaimer Survey disclaimer WIKIPEDIA MAKES NO GUARANTEE OF VALIDITY Wikipedia is an online open-content collaborative encyclopedia; that is, a voluntary association of individuals and groups working to develop a common resource of human knowledge. The structure of the project allows anyone with an Internet connection to alter its content. Please be advised that nothing found here has necessarily been reviewed by people with the expertise required to provide you with complete, accurate or reliable information. That is not to say that you will not find valuable and accurate information in Wikipedia; much of the time you will. However, Wikipedia cannot guarantee the validity of the information found here. The content of any given article may recently have been changed, vandalized or altered by someone whose opinion does not correspond with the state of knowledge in the relevant fields. Note that most other encyclopedias and reference works also have disclaimers. No formal peer review Our active community of editors uses tools such as the Special:RecentChanges and Special:NewPages feeds to monitor new and changing content. However, Wikipedia is not uniformly peer reviewed; while readers may correct errors or engage in casual peer review, they have no legal duty to do so and thus all information read here is without any implied warranty of fitness for any purpose or use whatsoever. Even articles that have been vetted by informal peer review or featured article processes may later have been edited inappropriately, just before you view them. None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with Wikipedia in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in or linked from these web pages. No contract; limited license Please make sure that you understand that the information provided here is being provided freely, and that no kind of agreement or contract is created between you and the owners or users of this site, the owners of the servers upon which it is housed, the individual Wikipedia contributors, any project administrators, sysops or anyone else who is in any way connected with this project or sister projects subject to your claims against them directly. You are being granted a limited license to copy anything from this site; it does not create or imply any contractual or extracontractual liability on the part of Wikipedia or any of its agents, members, organizers or other users. There is no agreement or understanding between you and Wikipedia regarding your use or modification of this information beyond the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA) and the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL); neither is anyone at Wikipedia responsible should someone change, edit, modify or remove any information that you may post on Wikipedia or any of its associated projects. Trademarks Any of the trademarks, service marks, collective marks, design rights or similar rights that are mentioned, used or cited in the articles of the Wikipedia encyclopedia are the property of their respective owners. Their use here does not imply that you may use them for any purpose other than for the same or a similar informational use as contemplated by the original authors of these Wikipedia articles under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL licensing schemes. Unless otherwise stated Wikipedia and Wikimedia sites are neither endorsed by nor affiliated with any of the holders of any such rights and as such Wikipedia cannot grant any rights to use any otherwise protected materials. Your use of any such or similar incorporeal property is at your own risk. Personality rights Wikipedia contains material which may portray an identifiable person who is alive or deceased recently. The use of images of living or recently deceased individuals is, in some jurisdictions, restricted by laws pertaining to personality rights, independent from their copyright status. Before using these types of content, please ensure that you have the right to use it under the laws which apply in the circumstances of your intended use. You are solely responsible for ensuring that you do not infringe someone else's personality rights. Jurisdiction and legality of content Publication of information found in Wikipedia may be in violation of the laws of the country or jurisdiction from where you are viewing this information. The Wikipedia database is stored on servers in the United States of America, and is maintained in reference to the protections afforded under local and federal law. Laws in your country or jurisdiction may not protect or allow the same kinds of speech or distribution. Wikipedia does not encourage the violation of any laws, and cannot be responsible for any violations of such laws, should you link to this domain or use, reproduce or republish the information contained herein. Not professional advice If you need specific advice (for example, medical, legal, financial or risk management), please seek a professional who is licensed or knowledgeable in that area. Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:General_disclaimer&oldid=935141538" Categories: Wikipedia disclaimers Hidden categories: Wikipedia fully-protected project pages Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Project page Talk Variants Views Read View source View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons MediaWiki Meta-Wiki Wikispecies Wikibooks Wikidata Wikinews Wikiquote Wikisource Wikiversity Wikivoyage Wiktionary Languages Afrikaans Alemannisch العربية Aragonés ܐܪܡܝܐ অসমীয়া Asturianu Avañe'ẽ Azərbaycanca Bamanankan বাংলা Bân-lâm-gú Башҡортса Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ भोजपुरी Bikol Central Български Boarisch བོད་ཡིག Bosanski Буряад Català Cebuano Čeština Chi-Chewa ChiShona Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Diné bizaad Eesti Ελληνικά Emiliàn e rumagnòl Español Esperanto Euskara Eʋegbe فارسی Føroyskt Français Furlan Gaeilge Gàidhlig Galego ГӀалгӀай 贛語 ગુજરાતી 한국어 Hawaiʻi Հայերեն हिन्दी Hrvatski Bahasa Hulontalo Igbo Ilokano Bahasa Indonesia Interlingua Ирон IsiXhosa IsiZulu Íslenska Italiano עברית Jawa ಕನ್ನಡ ქართული Kernowek Kiswahili Kreyòl ayisyen Kurdî Кыргызча ລາວ Latviešu Lëtzebuergesch Lietuvių Ligure Limburgs Lingála Magyar Македонски മലയാളം Malti मराठी مازِرونی Bahasa Melayu Mìng-dĕ̤ng-ngṳ̄ Mirandés Монгол မြန်မာဘာသာ Nāhuatl Nederlands Nedersaksies नेपाली 日本語 Nordfriisk Norsk bokmål Norsk nynorsk Occitan ଓଡ଼ିଆ Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча ਪੰਜਾਬੀ Pälzisch پښتو ភាសាខ្មែរ Plattdüütsch Polski Português Română Runa Simi Русский Саха тыла Gagana Samoa संस्कृतम् Sardu Scots Shqip සිංහල Simple English سنڌي Slovenčina Slovenščina Soomaaliga کوردی Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Sunda Suomi Svenska Tagalog தமிழ் Татарча/tatarça తెలుగు ไทย Тоҷикӣ Türkçe Türkmençe Удмурт Українська اردو ئۇيغۇرچە / Uyghurche Tiếng Việt Volapük Võro West-Vlams Winaray ייִדיש 粵語 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 10 January 2020, at 19:19 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1471 ---- Archilochus - Wikipedia Archilochus From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Ancient Greek lyric poet For the hummingbird, see Archilochus (genus). Portrait of a bearded man (poet Archilochos?). Roman copy c. 2nd century BCE of the Greek original of 4 century BCE. Coin from ancient Thasos showing Satyr and nymph, dated to late 5th century BCE. Archilochus was involved in the Parian colonization of Thasos about two centuries before the coin was minted. His poetry includes vivid accounts of life as a warrior, seafarer and lover. Archilochus (/ɑːrˈkɪləkəs/; Greek: Ἀρχίλοχος Arkhilokhos; c. 680–645 BCE)[a] was a Greek lyric poet from the island of Paros in the Archaic period. He is celebrated for his versatile and innovative use of poetic meters, and is the earliest known Greek author to compose almost entirely on the theme of his own emotions and experiences.[3][4] Alexandrian scholars included him in their canonic list of iambic poets, along with Semonides and Hipponax,[5] yet ancient commentators also numbered him with Tyrtaeus and Callinus as the possible inventor of the elegy.[6] Modern critics often characterize him simply as a lyric poet.[7] Although his work now only survives in fragments, he was revered by the ancient Greeks as one of their most brilliant authors, able to be mentioned in the same breath as Homer and Hesiod,[8] yet he was also censured by them as the archetypal poet of blame[9] – his invectives were even said to have driven his former fiancée and her father to suicide. He presented himself as a man of few illusions either in war or in love, such as in the following elegy, where discretion is seen to be the better part of valour: Ἀσπίδι μὲν Σαΐων τις ἀγάλλεται, ἥν παρὰ θάμνῳ ἔντος ἀμώμητον κάλλιπον οὐκ ἐθέλων· αὐτὸν δ' ἔκ μ' ἐσάωσα· τί μοι μέλει ἀσπὶς ἐκείνη; Ἐρρέτω· ἐξαῦτις κτήσομαι οὐ κακίω.[10] One of the Saians (Thracian tribe) now delights in the shield I discarded Unwillingly near a bush, for it was perfectly good, But at least I got myself safely out. Why should I care for that shield? Let it go. Some other time I'll find another no worse.[citation needed] Archilochus was much imitated even up to Roman times and three other distinguished poets later claimed to have thrown away their shields – Alcaeus, Anacreon and Horace.[11] Contents 1 Biography 1.1 The historical sources 1.2 Scholarship and the biographical tradition 1.2.1 The poet's character 2 Poetry 2.1 Style 3 Recent discoveries 4 Quotes 5 Notes 6 References 6.1 Bibliography 7 External links Biography[edit] The historical sources[edit] A considerable amount of information about the life of Archilochus has come down to the modern age via his surviving work, the testimony of other authors and inscriptions on monuments,[4] yet it all needs to be viewed with caution – the biographical tradition is generally unreliable and the fragmentary nature of the poems doesn't really support inferences about his personal history.[12] The vivid language and intimate details of the poems often look autobiographical[8][13] yet it is known, on the authority of Aristotle, that Archilochus sometimes role-played. The philosopher quoted two fragments as examples of an author speaking in somebody else's voice: in one, an unnamed father commenting on a recent eclipse of the sun and, in the other, a carpenter named Charon, expressing his indifference to the wealth of Gyges, the king of Lydia.[14] There is nothing in those two fragments to suggest that Archilochus is speaking in those roles (we rely entirely on Aristotle for the context) and possibly many of his other verses involved role-playing too. It has even been suggested by one modern scholar that imaginary characters and situations might have been a feature of the poetic tradition within which Archilochus composed, known by the ancients as iambus.[15] The two poems quoted by Aristotle help to date the poet's life (assuming of course that Charon and the unnamed father are speaking about events that Archilochus had experienced himself). Gyges reigned 687–652 BCE and the date of the eclipse must have been either 6 April 648 BCE or 27 June 660 BCE (another date, 14 March 711 BCE, is generally considered too early).[4] These dates are consistent with other evidence of the poet's chronology and reported history, such as the discovery at Thasos of a cenotaph, dated around the end of the seventh century and dedicated to a friend named in several fragments: Glaucus, son of Leptines.[16] The chronology for Archilochus is complex but modern scholars generally settle for c.680–c.640 BCE.[4] Whether or not their lives had been virtuous, authors of genius were revered by their fellow Greeks. Thus a sanctuary to Archilochus (the Archilocheion) was established on his home island Paros sometime in the third century BCE, where his admirers offered him sacrifices, as well as to gods such as Apollo, Dionysus, and the Muses.[8] Inscriptions found on orthostats from the sanctuary include quoted verses and historical records. In one, we are told that his father Telesicles once sent Archilochus to fetch a cow from the fields, but that the boy chanced to meet a group of women who soon vanished with the animal and left him a lyre in its place – they were the Muses and they had thus earmarked him as their protégé. According to the same inscription, the omen was later confirmed by the oracle at Delphi. Not all the inscriptions are as fanciful as that. Some are records by a local historian of the time, set out in chronological order according to custom, under the names of archons. Unfortunately, these are very fragmentary.[17] Snippets of biographical information are provided by ancient authors as diverse as Tatian, Proclus, Clement of Alexandria, Cicero, Aelian, Plutarch, Galen, Dio Chrysostom, Aelius Aristides and several anonymous authors in the Palatine Anthology. See and other poets below for the testimony of some famous poets. Scholarship and the biographical tradition[edit] According to tradition, Archilochus was born to a notable family on Paros. His grandfather (or great-grandfather), Tellis, helped establish the cult of Demeter on Thasos near the end of the eighth century, a mission that was famously depicted in a painting at Delphi by the Thasian Polygnotus.[3] The painting, later described by Pausanias, showed Tellis in Hades, sharing Charon's boat with the priestess of Demeter.[b] The poet's father, Telesicles, also distinguished himself in the history of Thasos, as the founder of a Parian colony there. The names 'Tellis' and 'Telesicles' can have religious connotations and some modern scholars infer that the poet was born into a priestly family devoted to Demeter. Inscriptions in the Archilocheion identify Archilochus as a key figure in the Parian cult of Dionysus[19] There is no evidence to back isolated reports that his mother was a slave, named Enipo, that he left Paros to escape poverty, or that he became a mercenary soldier – the slave background is probably inferred from a misreading of his verses; archaeology indicates that life on Paros, which he associated with "figs and seafaring", was quite prosperous; and though he frequently refers to the rough life of a soldier, warfare was a function of the aristocracy in the archaic period and there is no indication that he fought for pay.[4][c] "Look Glaucus! Already waves are disturbing the deep sea and a cloud stands straight round about the heights of Gyrae,[d] a sign of storm; from the unexpected comes fear." The trochaic verse was quoted by the Homeric scholar Heraclitus, who said that Archilochus used the image to describe war with the Thracians.[22] The life of Archilochus was marked by conflicts. The ancient tradition identified a Parian, Lycambes, and his daughters as the main target of his anger. The father is said to have betrothed his daughter, Neobule, to Archilochus, but reneged on the agreement, and the poet retaliated with such eloquent abuse that Lycambes, Neobule and one or both of his other daughters committed suicide.[23][24] The story later became a popular theme for Alexandrian versifiers, who played upon its poignancy at the expense of Archilochus.[e] Some modern scholars believe that Lycambes and his daughters were not actually the poet's contemporaries but fictional characters in a traditional entertainment.[26] According to another view, Lycambes as an oath-breaker had marked himself out as a menace to society and the poet's invective was not just personal revenge but a social obligation consistent with the practice of 'iambos'.[27] The inscriptions in the Archilocheion imply that the poet had a controversial role in the introduction of the cult of Dionysus to Paros. It records that his songs were condemned by the Parians as "too iambic" (the issue may have concerned phallic worship) but they were the ones who ended up being punished by the gods for impiety, possibly with impotence. The oracle of Apollo then instructed them to atone for their error and rid themselves of their suffering by honouring the poet, which led to the shrine being dedicated to him.[28][29] His hero cult lasted on Paros over 800 years.[30] His combative spirit also expressed itself in warfare. He joined the Parian colony on Thasos and battled the indigenous Thracians, expressing himself in his poems as a cynical, hard-bitten soldier fighting for a country he doesn't love ("Thasos, thrice miserable city") on behalf of a people he scorns[f] yet he values his closest comrades and their stalwart, unglamorous commander.[g] Later he returned to Paros and joined the fight against the neighbouring island of Naxos. A Naxian warrior named Calondas won notoriety as the man that killed him. The Naxian's fate interested later authors such as Plutarch and Dio Chrysostom, since it had been a fair fight yet he was punished for it by the gods: He had gone to the temple of Apollo at Delphi to consult the oracle and was rebuked with the memorable words: "You killed the servant of the Muses; depart from the temple."[33] The poet's character[edit] Εἰμὶ δ' ἐγὼ θεράπων μὲν Ἐνυαλίοιο ἄνακτος, καὶ Μουσέων ἐρατὸν δῶρον ἐπιστάμενος. I am the servant of Lord Enyalios [Ares, god of war], and skilled in the lovely gift of the Muses.[34] This couplet testifies to a social revolution: Homer's poetry was a powerful influence on later poets and yet in Homer's day it had been unthinkable for a poet to be a warrior.[35] Archilochus deliberately broke the traditional mould even while adapting himself to it. "Perhaps there is a special relevance to his times in the particular gestures he elects to make: The abandonment of grandly heroic attitudes in favour of a new unsentimental honesty, an iconoclastic and flippant tone of voice coupled with deep awareness of traditional truths."[36] Ancient authors and scholars often reacted to his poetry and to the biographical tradition angrily, condemning "fault-finding Archilochus" for "fattening himself on harsh words of hatred" (see Pindar's comment below) and for "the unseemly and lewd utterances directed towards women", whereby he made "a spectacle of himself"[37] He was considered "... a noble poet in other respects if one were to take away his foul mouth and slanderous speech and wash them away like a stain" (Suda).[38] According to Valerius Maximus, the Spartans banished the works of Archilochus from their state for the sake of their children "... lest it harm their morals more than it benefited their talents."[39] Yet some ancient scholars interpreted his motives more sympathetically: "For of the two poets who for all time deserve to be compared with no other, namely Homer and Archilochus, Homer praised nearly everything ... But Archilochus went to the opposite extreme, to censure; seeing, I suppose, that men are in greater need of this, and first of all he censures himself ...", thus winning for himself "... the highest commendation from heaven." – Dio Chrysostom[40] Poetry[edit] The earliest meter in extant Greek poetry was the epic hexameter of Homer. Homer did not create the epic hexameter, however, and there is evidence that other meters also predate his work.[42] Thus, though ancient scholars credited Archilochus with the invention of elegy and iambic poetry, he probably built on a "flourishing tradition of popular song" that pre-dated Homer. His innovations however seem to have turned a popular tradition into an important literary medium.[36] His merits as a poet were neatly summarized by the rhetorician Quintilian: "We find in him the greatest force of expression, sententious statements that are not only vigorous but also terse and vibrant, and a great abundance of vitality and energy, to the extent that in the view of some his inferiority to anyone results from a defect of subject matter rather than poetic genius. – Quintilian[43] "A kingfisher flapped its wings on a protruding rock" – Archilochus fr. 41[44] The poet, "a frank celebrant of sex",[45] found various ways to describe sexual relations, including allusions. Here the rock is a phallic symbol and the kingfisher represents a female partner.[46] Most ancient commentators focused on his lampoons and on the virulence of his invective[47] as in the comments below, yet the extant verses (most of which come from Egyptian papyri[48]) indicate a very wide range of poetic interests. Alexandrian scholars collected the works of the other two major iambographers, Semonides and Hipponax, in just two books each, which were cited by number, whereas Archilochus was edited and cited not by book number but rather by poetic terms such as 'elegy', 'trimeters', 'tetrameters' and 'epodes'.[49] Moreover, even those terms fail to indicate his versatility: "... not all his iambic and trochaic poetry was invective. In his elegiacs we find neat epigrams, consolatory poems and a detailed prediction of battle; his trochaics include a cry for help in war, an address to his troubled soul and lines on the ideal commander; in his iambics we find an enchanting description of a girl and Charon the carpenter's rejection of tyranny."[29] One convenient way to classify the poems is to divide them between elegy and iambus (ἵαμβος) – elegy aimed at some degree of decorum, since it employed the stately hexameter of epic, whereas the term 'iambus', as used by Alexandrian scholars, denoted any informal kind of verse meant to entertain (it may have included the iambic meter but was not confined to it). Hence the accusation that he was "too iambic" (see Biography) referred not to his choice of meter but his subject matter and tone (for an example of his iambic verse see Strasbourg papyrus). Elegy was accompanied by the aulos or pipe, whereas the performance of iambus varied, from recitation or chant in iambic trimeter and trochaic tetrameter, to singing of epodes accompanied by some musical instrument (which one isn't known).[50] Archilochus was not included in the canonic list of nine lyric poets compiled by Hellenistic scholars – his range exceeded their narrow criteria for lyric ('lyric' meant verse accompanied by the lyre). He did in fact compose some lyrics but only the tiniest fragments of these survive today. However they include one of the most famous of all lyric utterances, a hymn to Heracles with which victors were hailed at the Olympic Games, featuring a resounding refrain Τήνελλα καλλίνικε in which the first word imitates the sound of the lyre.[29]{{efn|Τήνελλα καλλίνικε, χαῖρ' ἄναξ Ἡράκλεες, αὐτός τε καὶ Ἰόλαος, αἰχμητὰ δύο. Τήνελλα καλλίνικε χαῖρ' ἄναξ Ἡράκλεες. Style[edit] Like other archaic Greek poets, Archilochus relied heavily on Homer's example for his choice of language, particularly when using the same meter, dactylic hexameter (as for example in elegy), but even in other meters the debt is apparent – in the verse below, for example, his address to his embattled soul or spirit, θυμέ, has Homeric echoes.[52] The meter below is trochaic tetrameter catalectic (four pairs of trochees with the final syllable omitted), a form later favoured by Athenian dramatists because of its running character, expressing aggression and emotional intensity.[53] The comic poet Aristophanes employed it for the arrival on stage of an enraged chorus in The Knights, but Archilochus uses it here to communicate the need for emotional moderation. His use of the meter isn't intentionally ironic, however, since he didn't share the tidy functionalism of later theorists, for whom different meters and verse-forms were endowed with distinctive characters suited to different tasks – his use of meter is "neutral in respect of ethos".[29] The following verse is indicative too of the fragmentary nature of Archilochus's extant work: lines 2 and 3 are probably corrupted and modern scholars have tried to emend them in various ways, none satisfactory, though the general meaning is clear.[51] θυμέ, θύμ᾽ ἀμηχάνοισι κήδεσιν κυκώμενε, ἄνα δέ, δυσμενέων δ᾽ ἀλέξευ προσβαλὼν ἐναντίον στέρνον, ἐν δοκοῖσιν ἐχθρῶν πλησίον κατασταθείς ἀσφαλέως· καὶ μήτε νικῶν ἀμφαδὴν ἀγάλλεο μηδὲ νικηθεὶς ἐν οἴκωι καταπεσὼν ὀδύρεο. ἀλλὰ χαρτοῖσίν τε χαῖρε καὶ κακοῖσιν ἀσχάλα μὴ λίην· γίνωσκε δ᾽ οἷος ῥυσμὸς ἀνθρώπους ἔχει.[54] My Soul, my Soul, all disturbed by sorrows inconsolable, Bear up, hold out, meet front-on the many foes that rush on you Now from this side and now that, enduring all such strife up close, Never wavering; and should you win, don't openly exult, Nor, defeated, throw yourself lamenting in a heap at home, But delight in things that are delightful and, in hard times, grieve Not too much – appreciate the rhythm that controls men's lives. Recent discoveries[edit] A small papyrus scrap first published in 1908 which is derived from the same ancient manuscript of Archilochus that yielded the most recent discovery (P.Oxy. VI 854, 2nd century CE). Thirty previously unknown lines by Archilochus, in the elegiac meter, describing events leading up to the Trojan War, in which Achaeans battled Telephus king of Mysia, have recently been identified among the Oxyrhynchus Papyri and published in The Oxyrhynchus Papyri, Volume LXIX (Graeco-Roman Memoirs 89).[55] A discovery of a fragment of writing by Archilochus contained a citation of a proverb that was important to the proper interpretation of a letter in the Akkadian language from the emperor of the Old Assyrian Empire, Shamshi-Adad I, with the same proverb: "The bitch by her acting too hastily brought forth the blind."[56] Quotes[edit] "Keep some measure in the joy you take in luck, and the degree you give way to sorrow." (fragment 67, tr. Richmond Lattimore)[57] "Πόλλ᾽ οἶδ᾽ ἀλώπηξ, ἀλλ' ἐχῖνος ἕν μέγα." (The fox knows many things; the hedgehog one big thing.)[58][h] Notes[edit] ^ While these have been the generally accepted dates since Felix Jacoby (1941),[1] some scholars disagree; for instance, Robin Lane Fox (2008)[2] dates him c. 740–680 BCE. ^ "Tellis appears to be in his late teens, Cleoboea as still a girl and she has on her knees a chest of the sort that they are accustomed to make for Demeter. With regard to Tellis I heard only that he was the grandfather of Archilochus and they say that Cleoboea was the first to introduce the rites of Demeter to Thasos from Paros." – Pausanias 10.28.3[18] ^ The name 'Enipo' has connotations of abuse (enipai), which is curiously apt for the mother of a famous iambographer.[20] ^ The heights of Gyrae is a promontoty on Tenos, or a mythological allusion to the rocks on which the Lesser Ajax met his death.[21] ^ Elegies include the following by a certain Dioscorides, in which the victims are imagined to speak from the grave: "We here, the daughters of Lycambes who gained a hateful reputation, swear by the reverence in which this tomb of the dead is held that we did not shame our virginity or our parents or Paros, pre-eminent among holy islands, but Archilochus spewed forth frightful reproach and a hateful report against our family. We swear by the gods and spirits that we did not set eyes on Archilochus either in the streets or in Hera's great precinct. If we had been lustful and wicked, he would have not wanted to beget legitimate children from us." – Palatine Anthology 7.351[25] ^ "The [dregs] of all the Greeks have come together in Thasos".[31] ^ "I have no liking for a general who is tall, walks with a swaggering gait, takes pride in his curls, and is partly shaven. Let mine be one who is short, has a bent look about the shins, stands firmly on his feet, and is full of courage." – Fragment 114[32] ^ see Isaiah Berlin's The Hedgehog and the Fox References[edit] ^ Jacoby, Felix (1941). "The date of Archilochus". Classical Quarterly. 35: 97–109. ^ Fox, R.L. (2008). Travelling Heroes: Greeks and their myths in the epic age of Homer. London, UK: Allen Lane. p. 388. ISBN 978-0-7139-9980-8. ^ a b Barron & Easterling 1985, p. 117. ^ a b c d e Campbell 1982, p. 136. ^ Sophie Mills (2006), 'Archilochus', in Encyclopaedia of Ancient Greece, Nigel Wilson (ed.), Routledge, page 76 ^ Didymus ap. Orion, Et. Mag. p. 57, Scholiast on Ar. Birds 217, cited by Barron & Easterling 1985, p. 129 (note 1) ^ Diane J., Rayor (1991). Sappho's Lyre: Archaic lyric and women poets of ancient Greece. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-07336-4. ^ a b c Barron & Easterling 1985, p. 118. ^ Brown 1997, p. 49. ^ Gerber, Douglas E., ed. (1999). "Fragment 5". Greek Iambic Poetry. Translated by Gerber, Douglas E. Loeb Classical Library. pp. 80–82. ISBN 9780674995819. ^ Campbell 1982, p. 145. ^ Brown 1997, p. 43. ^ Van Sickle (October–November 1975), "Archilochus: A New Fragment of an Epode" The Classical Journal 71.1:1–15, p. 14. ^ Aristotle Rhetoric 3.17.1418b28, cited by Douglas E. Gerber (1999), Greek Iambic Poetry, Loeb Classical Library, pages 93–95 ^ West 1974, pp. 22–39. ^ Brown 1997, pp. 43–44. ^ Douglas E. Gerber (1999), Greek Iambic Poetry, Loeb Classical Library, pages 16–33 ^ translated by Douglas E. Gerber (1999), Greek Iambic Poetry, Loeb Classical Library, page 75 ^ Brown 1997, pp. 45–46. ^ West 1974, p. 28. ^ Douglas E. Gerber (tr)(ed) (1999), Greek Iambic Poetry, Loeb Classical Library, note 1 page 145 ^ Campbell 1982, p. 150. ^ Douglas E. Gerber (1999), Greek Iambic Poetry, Loeb Classical Library, page 75 ^ Gerber, Douglas E., 1997, A Companion to the Greek Lyric Poets, Brill. ISBN 90-04-09944-1. cf. p.50 ^ cited and translated by Douglas E. Gerber (1999), Greek Iambic Poetry, Loeb Classical Library, page 49 ^ West 1974, p. 27. ^ Brown 1997, p. 59. ^ Brown 1997, p. 46. ^ a b c d Campbell 1982, p. 138. ^ Encyclopedia of ancient Greece By Nigel Guy Wilson Page 353 ISBN 978-0-415-97334-2 ^ Barron & Easterling 1985, p. 121. ^ Fragment 114 cited and translated by Douglas E. Gerber, Greek Iambic Poetry, Loeb Classical Library, page 153[full citation needed] ^ Galen, Exhortation to learning, cited and translated by Douglas E. Gerber (1999), Greek Iambic Poetry, Loeb Classical Library, page 41 ^ Fr. 1, cited and translated by Douglas E. Gerber (1999), Greek Iambic Poetry, Loeb Classical Library, page 77 ^ Denis Page, 'Archilochus and the Oral Tradition', Entretiens Hardt 10: 117–163, Geneva ^ a b Barron & Easterling 1985, p. 119. ^ Plutarch, de curiositate 10.520a-b cited and translated by Douglas E. Gerber (1999), Greek Iambic Poetry, Loeb Classical Library, page 63 ^ Suda (i.376.11 Adler) = Aelian fr. 80 Hercher, cited and translated by Douglas E. Gerber (1999), Loeb Classical Library, page 39[full citation needed] ^ Valerius Maximus, 6.3, ext. 1, cited and translated by Douglas E. Gerber (1999), Loeb Classical Library, page 39[full citation needed] ^ Dio Chrysostom 33.11–12, cited and translated Douglas E. Gerber (1999), Loeb Classical Library, page 43[full citation needed] ^ Jeffrey M. Hurwit, The Art and Culture of Early Greece[full citation needed] ^ See for example the Iliad 1.472–474; 16.182–183; 18.493[41] ^ Quintilian, Principles of Oratory 10.1.60, cited and translated by D.E. Gerber (1999), Loeb Classical Library, page 65[full citation needed] ^ cited and translated by Douglas E. Gerber (1999), Greek Iambic Poetry, Loeb Classical Library, page 113 ^ Barron & Easterling 1985, p. 122. ^ West 1974, pp. 123–124. ^ Barron & Easterling 1985, p. 123. ^ Davenport, Guy (1980), Archilochus, Alcman, Sappho: Three Lyric Poets of the Seventh Century B.C. University of California Press. ISBN 0-520-05223-4, p.2. ^ D.E. Gerber (1999), Loeb Classical Library, page 6 ^ Barron & Easterling 1985, pp. 120–121. ^ a b Campbell 1982, pp. 153–154. ^ See Odyssey 20.18 ff, Iliad 22.98–99 and 22.122[51] ^ L.P.E. Parker, (1997), The Songs of Aristophanes, Oxford, p. 36 ^ Archilochus fr. 128, quoted by Stobaeus (3.20.28), cited by Douglas E. Gerber (1999), Greek Iambic Poetry, Loeb Classical Library, page 167 ^ "POxy Oxyrhynchus Online". www.papyrology.ox.ac.uk. ^ Moran, William L. (1978). "An Assyriological gloss on the new Archilochus fragment". Harvard Studies in Classical Philology. 82: 18. doi:10.2307/311017. JSTOR 311017. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2012-07-01. Retrieved 2008-05-09.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) ^ 151 [Ed.118]; quoted in M. L. West (ed.), (1971), Iambi et elegi Graeci, Vol. I, Oxford Bibliography[edit] Brown, Christopher (1997). "Introduction". In Gerber, Douglas E. (ed.). A Companion to the Greek Lyric Poets. Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-09944-9. Campbell, David A. (1982). Greek Lyric Poetry. Bristol Classical Press. ISBN 978-0-86292-008-1. Barron, J. P.; Easterling, P. E. (1985). "Elegy and Iambus". In Easterling, P. E.; Knox, Bernard M. W. (eds.). The Cambridge History of Classical Literature. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-35981-8. West, Martin L. (1974). Studies in Greek Elegy and Iambus. Walter de Gruyter. ISBN 978-3-11-083318-8. External links[edit] Wikimedia Commons has media related to Archilochos. Wikiquote has quotations related to: Archilochus Works written by or about Archilochus at Wikisource Introduction to Archilochos and translation of A's longest fragment by Guy Davenport Web Resources on Archilochos The Poetry of Archilochos Archilochos fragments in Greek Archilochus Bilingual Anthology (in Greek and English, side by side) Archilochos Poems – J. M. Edmonds Edition Zweisprachige Textauswahl zu den griechischen Lyrikern mit zusätzlichen Hilfen SORGLL: Archilochos 67; read by Stephen Daitz Archilochos of Paros and Archilochos' Beloved Paros: documentaries by Yannis Tritsibidas Authority control BIBSYS: 90193837 BNE: XX1302018 BNF: cb123142449 (data) CiNii: DA03337612 GND: 118503855 ICCU: IT\ICCU\CFIV\087177 ISNI: 0000 0001 2140 2007 LCCN: n80008559 NKC: xx0143866 NLK: KAC201105059 NTA: 069646554 RERO: 02-A000009078 SELIBR: 223275 SUDOC: 032035535 VcBA: 495/42023 VIAF: 100167694 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n80008559 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Archilochus&oldid=992328684" Categories: 680s BC births 640s BC deaths Ancient Greek poets Ionic Greek poets Iambic poets 7th-century BC poets Ancient Thasos Ancient Parians Epigrammatists of the Greek Anthology Hidden categories: All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from May 2020 All articles with incomplete citations Articles with incomplete citations from May 2020 CS1 maint: archived copy as title Articles with short description Short description matches Wikidata Articles containing Ancient Greek (to 1453)-language text Commons category link is on Wikidata Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CINII identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ICCU identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with RERO identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikiquote Wikisource Languages العربية Aragonés Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ Български Brezhoneg Català Čeština Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Estremeñu Euskara فارسی Français Galego 한국어 Հայերեն Bahasa Indonesia Íslenska Italiano עברית ქართული Қазақша Latina Latviešu Magyar Македонски Mirandés Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Polski Português Română Русский Sicilianu Slovenčina Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Tagalog Türkçe Українська 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 4 December 2020, at 18:17 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1501 ---- Pages that link to "Horace" - Wikipedia Help Pages that link to "Horace" ← Horace Jump to navigation Jump to search What links here Page:  Namespace: all (Article) Talk User User talk Wikipedia Wikipedia talk File File talk MediaWiki MediaWiki talk Template Template talk Help Help talk Category Category talk Portal Portal talk Book Book talk Draft Draft talk Education Program Education Program talk TimedText TimedText talk Module Module talk Gadget Gadget talk Gadget definition Gadget definition talk   Invert selection Filters Hide transclusions | Hide links | Hide redirects The following pages link to Horace External tool: Transclusion count Displayed 50 items. View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500) Achilles ‎ (links | edit) Arthur Schopenhauer ‎ (links | edit) Avicenna ‎ (links | edit) Augustus ‎ (links | edit) Alcaeus of Mytilene ‎ (links | edit) Apuleius ‎ (links | edit) Aedile ‎ (links | edit) Ab urbe condita ‎ (links | edit) Aeacus ‎ (links | edit) A. E. Housman ‎ (links | edit) Bede ‎ (links | edit) Classics ‎ (links | edit) Catullus ‎ (links | edit) Carlo Goldoni ‎ (links | edit) Continuity (fiction) ‎ (links | edit) Cicero ‎ (links | edit) Cursus honorum ‎ (links | edit) Roman censor ‎ (links | edit) Celts ‎ (links | edit) Carthage ‎ (links | edit) Chaldea ‎ (links | edit) Candide ‎ (links | edit) Cerberus ‎ (links | edit) December 8 ‎ (links | edit) Denis Diderot ‎ (links | edit) Diana (mythology) ‎ (links | edit) Dactylic hexameter ‎ (links | edit) Encyclopedia ‎ (links | edit) Empedocles ‎ (links | edit) Elegiac couplet ‎ (links | edit) Ennius ‎ (links | edit) Epitaph ‎ (links | edit) Fernando Pessoa ‎ (links | edit) Greece ‎ (links | edit) Gotthold Ephraim Lessing ‎ (links | edit) Giosuè Carducci ‎ (links | edit) Horace (transclusion) ‎ (links | edit) Hexameter ‎ (links | edit) Italy ‎ (links | edit) Italic languages ‎ (links | edit) Jonathan Swift ‎ (links | edit) Julian calendar ‎ (links | edit) John Quincy Adams ‎ (links | edit) Satires (Juvenal) ‎ (links | edit) Julius Caesar ‎ (links | edit) Julio-Claudian dynasty ‎ (links | edit) John Milton ‎ (links | edit) Latin ‎ (links | edit) Livy ‎ (links | edit) Latin literature ‎ (links | edit) View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500) Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/Horace" Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools Upload file Special pages Printable version Languages Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1502 ---- Horace's Villa - Wikipedia Horace's Villa From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia   (Redirected from Horace's villa) Jump to navigation Jump to search Horace's Villa Villa Romana di Orazio Drawing of the villa Shown within Italy Location Licenza, Province of Rome, Lazio, Italy Type Dwelling History Cultures Roman Site notes Condition Ruined Ownership Public Public access Yes Horace's Villa is a Roman archaeological complex near Licenza, Italy. The identification has been made possible because Horace wrote several poems about the place, and the location of the villa corresponds to the geographical indications in the poetry. The site can be visited today.[1] Contents 1 Identification 2 Description 3 References 4 External links Identification[edit] It was owing to references to the villa in Horace's writings that humanists attempted to find the site as early as the mid-fifteenth century, but the site in Licenza was not considered as a possible candidate for two hundred years. This changed when an inscription mentioning a temple of the goddess Victory was found in nearby Roccagiovine. Vicovaro (marked), close to Tibur on the Tabula Peutingeriana, 12-13th century Horace tells in one of his poems (Epistles 1.10) that his villa was next to the sanctuary of the Sabine goddess, Vacuna. Lucas Holstenius (a mid-17th century geographer and a librarian at the Vatican Library) identified the sanctuary with the temple of the goddess Victory mentioned in the inscription, and he showed that the Romans associated the Sabine deity with their goddess Victoria. A confirmation of Holstenius' thesis came in 1757 with the discovery of the massa Mandelana inscription near Cantalupo (Mandela), which helped antiquarians to identify yet another place name mentioned by Horace as being near his Sabine estate. Description[edit] The Aniene Valley to the east of Rome is rich with archaeological remains. The Roman villa on the east slope of the Colle Rotondo (980 meters above sea level) in the Lucretili Mountains near the hilltown of Licenza is one of the best preserved and most significant sites. Attributed by most scholars since the 18th century to the Roman poet Horace, this villa dates from the first century B.C. and is located just 30 miles from the center of Rome in a valley near Vicovaro and Hadrian's Villa at Tivoli. The actual site was identified and a small portion was excavated in the 18th century. Major excavations were undertaken in the early 20th century. Thus far, the main residence of the estate has been identified, covering, in the imperial period, some 40 x 110 meters of built space and gardens. Black and white mosaics (formerly dated to Horace's lifespan, but now known to be from the Flavian dynasty), marble wall revetment and architectonic elements, an elaborate water system, and artistic and utilitarian remains have been found. A selection of the material is on display in the local museum in the town of Licenza. References[edit] ^ "Horace's Villa at Licenza". Archived from the original on 2 April 2018. External links[edit] Horace's Villa Project of the American Academy in Rome and the Soprintendenza Archeologica per il Lazio A two-part documentary about Horace's Villa Site of the Villa in Google Maps Authority control BNF: cb14535623q (data) GND: 4361917-4 LCCN: sh95005567 NLI: 000594565 SUDOC: 076495019 VcBA: 494/5161 VIAF: 240066424 WorldCat Identities: viaf-240066424 Coordinates: 42°03′58″N 12°54′04″E / 42.0661°N 12.9011°E / 42.0661; 12.9011 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Horace%27s_Villa&oldid=982124824" Categories: Roman villas in Italy Buildings and structures in Lazio Archaeological sites in Lazio Horace Hidden categories: Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLI identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Coordinates on Wikidata Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Deutsch Italiano Edit links This page was last edited on 6 October 2020, at 09:14 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1579 ---- Libanius - Wikipedia Libanius From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Libanius" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (December 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) Libanius as imagined in an eighteenth-century woodcut Libanius (Greek: Λιβάνιος, Libanios; c. 314 – 392 or 393) was a Greek teacher of rhetoric of the Sophist school. During the rise of Christian hegemony in the later Roman Empire, he remained unconverted and in religious matters was a pagan Hellene. Contents 1 Life 2 Works 3 English editions 4 References 5 External links Life[edit] Libanius was born into a once-influential, deeply cultured family of Antioch[1] that had recently come into diminished circumstances. At fourteen years old he began his study of rhetoric, for which he withdrew from public life and devoted himself to philosophy. Unfamiliar with Latin literature, he deplored its influence. He studied in Athens under Diophantus the Arab and began his career in Constantinople as a private tutor. He was exiled to Nicomedia in 346 (or earlier) for around five years[1] but returned to Constantinople and taught there until 354.[2] Before his exile, Libanius was a friend of the emperor Julian, with whom some correspondence survives, and in whose memory he wrote a series of orations; they were composed between 362 and 365. In 354 he accepted the chair of rhetoric in Antioch, his birthplace, where he stayed until his death. His pupils included both pagans and Christians.[2] Libanius used his arts of rhetoric to advance various private and political causes. He attacked the increasing imperial pressures on the traditional city-oriented culture that had been supported and dominated by the local upper classes. He is known to have protested against the persecution of pagans in the late Roman Empire. In 386, he appealed without success to emperor Theodosius to prevent the destruction of a temple in Edessa, and pleaded for toleration and the preservation of the temples against the predation of Christian monks, who he claimed: "hasten to attack the temples with sticks and stones and bars of iron, and in some cases, disdaining these, with hands and feet. Then utter desolation follows, with the stripping of roofs, demolition of walls, the tearing down of statues and the overthrow of altars, and the priests must either keep quiet or die. After demolishing one, they scurry to another, and to a third, and trophy is piled on trophy, in contravention of the law. Such outrages occur even in the cities, but they are most common in the countryside. Many are the foes who perpetrate the separate attacks, but after their countless crimes this scattered rabble congregates and they are in disgrace unless they have committed the foulest outrage...Temples, Sire, are the soul of the countryside: they mark the beginning of its settlement, and have been passed down through many generations to the men of today. In them the farming communities rest their hopes for husbands, wives, children, for their oxen and the soil they sow and plant. An estate that has suffered so has lost the inspiration of the peasantry together with their hopes, for they believe that their labour will be in vain once they are robbed of the gods who direct their labours to their due end. And if the land no longer enjoys the same care, neither can the yield match what it was before, and, if this be the case, the peasant is the poorer, and the revenue jeopardized."[3] The surviving works of Libanius, which include over 1,600 letters, 64 speeches and 96 progymnasmata (rhetorical exercises), are valuable as a historical source for the changing world of the later 4th century.[2] His oration "A Reply To Aristides On Behalf Of The Dancers" is one of the most important records of Roman concert dance, particularly that immensely popular form known as pantomime.[4] His first Oration I is an autobiographical narrative, first written in 374 and revised throughout his life, a scholar's account that ends as an old exile's private journal. Progymnasma 8 (see below for explanation of a "progymnasma") is an imaginary summation of the prosecution's case again a physician charged with poisoning some of his patients.[5] Although Libanius was not a Christian his students included such notable Christians as John Chrysostom[1] and Theodore of Mopsuestia.[6] Despite his friendship with the pagan restorationist Emperor Julian he was made an honorary praetorian prefect by the Christian Emperor Theodosius I. Works[edit] 64 orations in the three fields of oratory: judicial, deliberative and epideictic, both orations as if delivered in public and orations meant to be privately read (aloud) in the study. The two volumes of selections in the Loeb Classical Library devote one volume to Libanius' orations that bear on the emperor Julian, the other on Theodosius; the most famous is his "Lamentation" about the desecration of the temples (Περὶ τῶν Ἱερῶν); 51 declamationes, a traditional public-speaking format of Rhetoric in Antiquity, taking set topics with historical and mythological themes (translations into English by e.g. D.A. Russell, "Libanius: Imaginary Speeches"; M. Johansson, "Libanius' Declamations 9 and 10"; 96 progymnasmata or compositional exercises for students of rhetoric, used in his courses of instruction and widely admired as models of good style; 57 hypotheses or introductions to Demosthenes' orations (written ca 352), in which he sets them in historical context for the novice reader, without polemics; 1545 letters have been preserved, more letters than those of Cicero. Some 400 additional letters in Latin were later accepted, purporting to be translations, but a dispassionate examination of the texts themselves shows them to be misattributed or forgeries, by the Italian humanist Francesco Zambeccari in the 15th century. Among his correspondents there was Censorius Datianus. English editions[edit] Scott Bradbury, Selected Letters of Libanius. Liverpool, University Press, 2004. ISBN 0-85323-509-0 Raffaella Cribiore, The School of Libanius in Late Antique Antioch. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007. (Includes translation of c. 200 letters dealing with the school and its students. Reviewed in Bryn Mawr Classical Reviews.) Margaret E. Molloy: Libanius and the Dancers, Olms-Weidmann, Hildesheim 1996 ISBN 3-487-10220-X A.F. Norman, Libanius: Selected Works, 2 volumes. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Loeb Classical Library, 1969–1977. A.F. Norman, Libanius: Autobiography and Selected Letters, 2 volumes. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Loeb Classical Library, 1993. Reviewed in Bryn Mawr Classical Reviews.) Lieve Van Hoof, Libanius: a critical introduction (Cambridge University Press, 2014) References[edit] ^ a b c Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Libanius" . Encyclopædia Britannica. 16 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 534. ^ a b c Speake, Graham, ed. (1994). Dictionary of Ancient History. London: Penguin Books. p. 370. ISBN 0-14-051260-8. ^ Pro Templis (Oration XXX.8-10) ^ Alessandra Zanobi, Ancient Pantomime and its Reception, Article retrieved April 2016 [1] ^ Ratzan RM and Ferngren GB (April 1993). "A Greek progymnasma on the physician-poisoner". Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences. 48 (2): 157–70. ^ Cameron, A. (1998) "Education and literary culture" in Cameron, A. and Garnsey, P. (eds.) The Cambridge ancient history: Vol. XIII The late empire, A.D. 337-425. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 668-669. External links[edit] Libanius: "Funeral Oration on Julian" Libanius: "16 letters to Julian" Libanius: "On the temple of Apollo destroyed by fire" Libanius: "On Nicomedia, destroyed by an earthquake" Libanius: Oration 30: for the temples (in French) Centre Libanios, the Libanius Site by P.-L. Malosse, part of CRISES research centre. Two moral anecdotes from the Progymnasmata: (in English) on the harshness of classical Roman education and an encomium of Thersites Craig Gibson, translator, Summary of “Libanius, Hypotheses to the Orations of Demosthenes” Open source XML version of Libanius' works by the University of Leipzig, at Open Greek & Latin Project Authority control BIBSYS: 90333936 BNE: XX1315863 BNF: cb11912954z (data) CANTIC: a10418933 CiNii: DA01323515 GND: 11857258X ISNI: 0000 0001 2122 2137 LCCN: n50052091 LNB: 000046383 NDL: 001156519 NKC: jn19990005063 NLA: 35304333 NLG: 22890 NLI: 000084151 NSK: 000423216 NTA: 068216483 RERO: 02-A000105012 SELIBR: 71241 SUDOC: 026989573 Trove: 904679 VcBA: 495/56341 VIAF: 17225859 WorldCat Identities: viaf-74669487 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Libanius&oldid=994437266" Categories: 314 births 394 deaths Byzantine-era pagans 4th-century writers 4th-century Romans Ancient Greek rhetoricians Ancient Greek educators Ancient Greek writers Correspondents of Libanius Roman-era students in Athens Roman-era Sophists Roman-era Greeks Persecution of pagans in the late Roman Empire Hidden categories: Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica with Wikisource reference Articles needing additional references from December 2013 All articles needing additional references Articles containing Greek-language text Articles with French-language sources (fr) Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CANTIC identifiers Wikipedia articles with CINII identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with LNB identifiers Wikipedia articles with NDL identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLG identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLI identifiers Wikipedia articles with NSK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with RERO identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with Trove identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikisource Languages العربية Български Català Čeština Deutsch Ελληνικά Español فارسی Français Galego Հայերեն Bahasa Indonesia Italiano עברית Latina Lietuvių Lingua Franca Nova Magyar Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Polski Português Română Русский Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Türkçe Українська Edit links This page was last edited on 15 December 2020, at 18:46 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1580 ---- Women in ancient Rome - Wikipedia Women in ancient Rome From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search The educated and well-traveled Vibia Sabina (ca. 136 AD) was a grand-niece of the emperor Trajan and became the wife of his successor Hadrian; unlike some empresses, she played little role in court politics and remained independent in private life, having no children and seeking emotional gratification in love affairs[1] Part of a series on Women in society Society Women's history (legal rights) Woman Animal advocacy Business Female entrepreneur Gender representation on corporate boards of directors Economic development Explorers and travelers Education Feminism Womyn Government Conservatives in the US heads of government heads of state Queen regnant List Health Journalism and the media Law Law enforcement Military Mother Nobel Prize laureates Piracy Positions of power Reproductive rights Venture capital Violence and abuse Voting rights Workforce Exchange of women Science Technology Computing Engineering Geology Medicine dentistry in the United States Organizations Science Science, technology, engineering and mathematics Space Telegraphy Arts Humanities Architecture Arts Art history field Dance Film industry "Chick flicks" Films about women Film directors, cinematographers and screenwriters Fine arts Literature Science fiction Philosophy Feminist philosophy Photography Music Jazz Punk rock In Shakespeare's works Religion Bahá'í Faith Bible Buddhism Christianity Catholicism Mormonism Opus Dei Daoism Hinduism Islam Judaism Sikhism Popular culture Comics Portrayal in American comics Film industry Music Fictional pirates Speculative fiction Video games Gender representation in video games Sports Auto racing Baseball Basketball Boxing Cricket Curling Cycling Fastpitch softball Football / soccer Golf Gymnastics Ice hockey Lacrosse Mixed martial arts Netball Paralympic Games Rodeo Roller derby Rowing Surfing Swimming Tennis Track and field Volleyball Winter sport See also: List of sports By country Afghanistan Albania Algeria Andorra Angola Argentina Armenia Australia Azerbaijan Bahrain Bangladesh Belgium Benin Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia Brazil Brunei Bulgaria Burma Cambodia Chad Chile China Colombia Comoros Croatia Cuba Cyprus (North) Denmark DR Congo Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador East Timor Ethiopia FS Micronesia Fiji Finland France Georgia Germany Ghana Greece Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Iceland Italy India Indonesia Iran Iraq Israel Ivory Coast Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Laos Lebanon Libya Madagascar Malaysia Maldives Mali Marshall Islands Mauritania Mauritius Mexico Mongolia Morocco Nepal New Zealand Niger Nigeria North Korea Oman Pakistan Palau Panama Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Russia Saudi Arabia Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Spain Somalia South Africa South Korea South Sudan Sudan Suriname Sri Lanka Sweden Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Thailand Tonga Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Tuvalu Trinidad and Tobago Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Vietnam Yemen v t e Freeborn women in ancient Rome were citizens (cives),[2] but could not vote or hold political office.[3] Because of their limited public role, women are named less frequently than men by Roman historians. But while Roman women held no direct political power, those from wealthy or powerful families could and did exert influence through private negotiations.[4] Exceptional women who left an undeniable mark on history range from Lucretia and Claudia Quinta, whose stories took on mythic significance; fierce Republican-era women such as Cornelia, mother of the Gracchi, and Fulvia, who commanded an army and issued coins bearing her image; women of the Julio-Claudian dynasty, most prominently Livia (58 BC-AD 29) and Agrippina the Younger (15 AD-59 AD), who contributed to the formation of Imperial mores; and the empress Helena (c.250–330 AD), a driving force in promoting Christianity.[5] As is the case with male members of society, elite women and their politically significant deeds eclipse those of lower status in the historical record. Inscriptions and especially epitaphs document the names of a wide range of women throughout the Roman Empire, but often tell little else about them. Some vivid snapshots of daily life are preserved in Latin literary genres such as comedy, satire, and poetry, particularly the poems of Catullus and Ovid, which offer glimpses of women in Roman dining rooms and boudoirs, at sporting and theatrical events, shopping, putting on makeup, practicing magic, worrying about pregnancy — all, however, through male eyes.[6] The published letters of Cicero, for instance, reveal informally how the self-proclaimed great man interacted on the domestic front with his wife Terentia and daughter Tullia, as his speeches demonstrate through disparagement the various ways Roman women could enjoy a free-spirited sexual and social life.[7] The one major public role reserved solely for women was in the sphere of religion: the priestly office of the Vestals. Forbidden from marriage or sex for a period of thirty years, the Vestals devoted themselves to the study and correct observance of rituals which were deemed necessary for the security and survival of Rome but which could not be performed by the male colleges of priests.[8] Contents 1 Childhood and education 2 Women in the family and law 2.1 Always a daughter 3 Women and sexuality 3.1 Augustus's campaign on women and the family 3.2 Women and the law 3.3 Marriage 3.3.1 Divorce 3.3.2 Remarriage 3.3.3 Concubinage 3.3.4 Domestic abuse 3.4 Motherhood 4 Daily life 4.1 In business 4.2 In politics 4.3 Women and the military 4.4 Religious life 4.5 Social activities 4.6 Attire and adornment 4.6.1 Body image 4.7 Mos maiorum and the love poets 4.8 Gynecology and medicine 5 Slavery 6 Prostitution 7 See also 8 References 9 Bibliography 10 Further reading 11 External links Childhood and education[edit] Roman girls playing a game Childhood and upbringing in ancient Rome were determined by social status. Roman children played a number of games, and their toys are known from archaeology and literary sources. Animal figures were popular, and some children kept live animals and birds as pets.[9] In Roman art, girls are shown playing many of the same games as boys, such as ball, hoop-rolling, and knucklebones. Dolls are sometimes found in the tombs of those who died before adulthood. The figures are typically 15–16 cm tall, with jointed limbs, and made of materials such as wood, terracotta, and especially bone and ivory. Girls coming of age dedicated their dolls to Diana, the goddess most concerned with girlhood, or to Venus when they were preparing for marriage.[10] Noble girls were known to marry as young as 12 years of age,[11] whereas females in the lower classes were more likely to marry slightly further into their teenage years.[12][13] An example of the marriage age of noble females can be seen with Cicero's lifelong friend Atticus, who married his daughter Caecilia Attica to Marcus Vipsanius Agrippa when she was 14.[13] Bronze statuette of the 1st century depicting a girl reading Girls were expected to safeguard their chastity, modesty and reputation, in preparation for eventual marriage.[14] The light regulation of marriage by the law with regards to minimum age (12) and consent to marriage was designed to leave families, primarily fathers, with much freedom to propel girls into marriage whenever and with whomever they saw fit. Marriage facilitated a partnership between the father and prospective husbands, and enabled the formation of a mutually beneficial alliance with both political and economic incentives at heart.[15] The social regime, geared towards early marriage and implemented through children's education and upbringing, was particularly restrictive for girls.[14] Some, perhaps many, girls went to a public primary school, however there is some evidence to suggest that girls’ education was limited to this elementary school level. It has been inferred that individual school tutoring of girls at home was led by concerns about threats to girls’ modesty in coeducational classrooms.[16] Ovid and Martial imply that boys and girls were educated either together or similarly, and Livy takes it for granted that the daughter of a centurion would be in school.[17] However many other historians and philosophers, such as Epictetus, suggest that the educational system, particularly rhetorical training, was preoccupied with the development of masculine virtue; with male teenagers performing school exercises in public speaking about Roman values.[18] Children of both genders learned to behave socially by attending dinner parties or other, less elitist events. Both genders participated in religious festivals; for example, at the Secular Games of 17 BC, the Carmen Saeculare was sung by a choir of girls and boys.[19] Children were made into virtuous adults through scholastic means, with curriculum, language, literature, and philosophy teaching moral precepts. Children of the elite were taught Greek as well as Latin from an early age.[20] Among the upper classes, women seem to have been well-educated, some highly so, and were sometimes praised by the male historians for their learning and cultivation.[21] Some women became socially prominent, and even relatively independent.[22] Cornelia Metella, the young wife of Pompey the Great at the time of his death, was distinguished for her musicianship and her knowledge of geometry, literature, and philosophy.[23] This degree of learning indicates formal preparation, however among the lower classes education was limited and strongly geared towards the course of marriage, and performing the tasks of the female within the household.[24] Elite families poured money into their daughters literary and virtue training to equip them with skills that would appeal to prospective husbands. Epictetus suggests that at the age of 14, girls were considered to be on the brink of womanhood, and beginning to understand the inevitability of their future role as wives. They learned modesty through explicit instruction and upbringing.[25] The lives of boys and girls began to diverge dramatically after they formally came of age,[26] and memorials to women recognize their domestic qualities far more often than intellectual achievements.[27] The skills a Roman matron needed to run a household required training, and mothers probably passed on their knowledge to their daughters in a manner appropriate to their station in life, given the emphasis in Roman society on traditionalism.[28] Virginity and sexual purity was a culturally valued quality, and considered vital for the stability of both family and state. The rape of an unmarried girl posed a threat to her reputation and marriageability, and the penalty of death was sometimes imposed on the unchaste daughter.[29] The Emperor Augustus introduced marriage legislation, the Lex Papia Poppaea, which rewarded marriage and childbearing. The legislation also imposed penalties on young persons who failed to marry and on those who committed adultery. Therefore, marriage and childbearing was made law between the ages of twenty-five and sixty for men, and twenty and fifty for women.[30] Women in the family and law[edit] Always a daughter[edit] See also: Pater familias Both daughters and sons were subject to patria potestas, the power wielded by their father as head of household (familia). A Roman household was considered a collective (corpus, a "body") over which the pater familias had mastery (dominium). Slaves, who had no legal standing, were part of the household as property. In the early Empire, the legal standing of daughters differed little if at all from that of sons.[31] If the father died without a will, the right of a daughter to share in the family property was equal to that of a son, though legislation in the 2nd century BCE had attempted to limit this right. Even apart from legal status, daughters seem no less esteemed within the Roman family than sons, though sons were expected to ensure family standing by following their fathers into public life.[32] Bust of a Roman girl, early 3rd century The pater familias had the right and duty to find a husband for his daughter,[33] and first marriages were normally arranged. Technically, the couple had to be old enough to consent, but the age of consent was 12 for girls and 14 for boys, though in practice boys seem to have been on average five years older. Among the elite, 14 was the age of transition from childhood to adolescence,[34] but a betrothal might be arranged for political reasons when the couple were too young to marry,[11] and in general noble women married younger than women of the lower classes. Most Roman women would have married in their late teens to early twenties. An aristocratic girl was expected to be a virgin when she married, as her young age might indicate.[35] A daughter could legitimately refuse a match made by her parents only by showing that the proposed husband was of bad character.[36] In the early Republic, the bride became subject to her husband's potestas, but to a lesser degree than their children.[37] By the early Empire, however, a daughter's legal relationship to her father remained unchanged when she married, even though she moved into her husband's home.[38] This arrangement was one of the factors in the degree of independence Roman women enjoyed relative to those of many other ancient cultures and up to the early modern period: although she had to answer to her father legally, she didn't conduct her daily life under his direct scrutiny,[39] and her husband had no legal power over her.[38] A daughter was expected to be deferential toward her father and to remain loyal to him, even if it meant having to differ with her husbands.[40] "Deference" was not always absolute. After arranging his daughter's first two marriages, Cicero disapproved — rightly, as it turned out — of her choice to marry the unreliable Dolabella, but found himself unable to prevent it.[41] A daughter kept her own family name (nomen) for life, not assuming that of her husband. Children usually took the father's name. In the Imperial period, however, children might sometimes make their mother's family name part of theirs, or even adopt it instead.[42] Women and sexuality[edit] From the start of the Roman republic, there was a high emphasis placed on a woman's virginity. Pudicitia (chastity) was a goddess of feminine purity, and was worshipped by Roman women. Only those who were virgins were allowed to enter the temple.[43] A woman's sexual life began with the consummation of her marriage in her husband's cubiculum, or private room where slaves did not enter. In Roman houses it was common for men and women to each have their own cubicula, allowing potential for them to engage in sex lives separate from each other. While it was expected that women should only have sexual relations with their husbands, it was common for men to have many sexual partners throughout his life.[43] After marriage, women were scrutinized in the household to prevent any adulterous behavior. For example, Julius Caesar's second wife, Pompeia, highlights this point well as she attempted to have private relations with Publius Clodius. Julius Caesar's mother, Aurelia, monitored Pompeia's actions and prevented their private meetings. The mere possibility of Pompeia committing adultery caused Caesar to divorce her.[44] Augustus's campaign on women and the family[edit] The obsession with a woman's purity, and her role as a faithful wife and dutiful mother in the family increased during the reign of Augustus. This general campaign to improve family dynamics began in 18–17 BC.[45] Augustus' new laws targeted both men and women between the ages of 20-55, who were rewarded for being in healthy relationships, and punished if not married and without children. Additionally, Augustus enforced the divorce and punishment of adulterous wives. Women under his rule could be punished in the courts for adultery and banished. This shifted a woman's body and relationships from being private, to become a public matter that could be regulated. Therefore, the palace was secured and driven by this idea that women would be returned to their proper places as chaste wives and mothers, and thus household order would be restored. Augustus went so far as to punish and exile his own daughter, Julia, for engaging in extramarital affairs.[45] Women and the law[edit] There never was a case in court in which the quarrel was not started by a woman. If Manilia is not a defendant, she'll be the plaintiff; she will herself frame and adjust the pleadings; she will be ready to instruct Celsus himself how to open his case, and how to urge his points. — Juvenal, Satire VI Although the rights and status of women in the earliest period of Roman history were more restricted than in the late Republic and Empire, as early as the 5th century BC, Roman women could own land, write their own wills, and appear in court. The historian Valerius Maximus devotes a section of his work On Memorable Deeds and Speeches to women who conducted cases on their own behalf, or on behalf of others.[46] These women got to show their ability as orators in the courtroom at a time when oratory was considered a defining pursuit of the most ambitious Roman men. One of these, Maesia Sentinas,[47] is identified by her origin in the town of Sentinum, and not, as was customary, by her relation to a man. The independent Maesia spoke in her own defense, and was acquitted almost unanimously after only a short trial because she spoke with such strength and effectiveness. Since these characteristics were considered masculine, however, the historian opined that under her feminine appearance, she had a "virile spirit," and thereafter she was called "the Androgyne."[48] Roman fresco of a maiden reading a text, Pompeian Fourth Style (60–79 AD), Pompeii, Italy Maesia's ability to present a case "methodically and vigorously" suggests that while women didn't plead regularly in open court, they had experience in private declamation and family court.[49] Afrania,[50] the wife of a senator during the time of Sulla, appeared so frequently before the praetor who presided over the court, even though she had male advocates who could have spoken for her, that she was accused of calumnia, malicious prosecution. An edict was consequently enacted that prohibited women from bringing claims on behalf of others, on the grounds that it jeopardized their pudicitia, the modesty appropriate to one's station.[51] It has been noted[52] that while women were often impugned for their feeblemindedness and ignorance of the law, and thus in need of protection by male advocates, in reality actions were taken to restrict their influence and effectiveness. Despite this specific restriction, there are numerous examples of women taking informed actions in legal matters in the Late Republic and Principate, including dictating legal strategy to their advocate behind the scenes.[53] An emancipated woman legally became sui iuris, or her own person, and could own property and dispose of it as she saw fit. If a pater familias died intestate, the law required the equal division of his estate amongst his children, regardless of their age and sex. A will that did otherwise, or emancipated any family member without due process of law, could be challenged.[54] From the late Republic onward, a woman who inherited a share equal with her brothers would have been independent of agnatic control.[55] As in the case of minors, an emancipated woman had a legal guardian (tutor) appointed to her. She retained her powers of administration, however, and the guardian's main if not sole purpose was to give formal consent to actions.[56] The guardian had no say in her private life, and a woman sui iuris could marry as she pleased.[57] A woman also had certain avenues of recourse if she wished to replace an obstructive tutor.[58] Under Augustus, a woman who had gained the ius liberorum, the legal right to certain privileges after bearing three children, was also released from guardianship,[59] and the emperor Claudius banned agnatic guardianship. The role of guardianship as a legal institution gradually diminished, and by the 2nd century CE the jurist Gaius said he saw no reason for it.[60] The Christianization of the Empire, beginning with the conversion of the Emperor Constantine in the early 4th century, eventually had consequences for the legal status of women. Marriage[edit] Main article: Marriage in ancient Rome Roman couple in the ceremonial joining of hands; the bride's knotted belt symbolized that her husband was "belted and bound" to her.[61] 4th century sarcophagus Family tomb inscriptions of respectable Romans suggest that the ideal Roman marriage was one of mutual loyalty, in which husband and wife shared interests, activities, and property.[62] In the earliest period of the Roman Republic, a bride passed from her father's control into the "hand" (manus) of her husband. She then became subject to her husband's potestas, though to a lesser degree than their children.[63] In the earliest periods of Roman history, Manus Marriage meant that a married woman would be subjugated by her husband, but that custom had died out by the 1st century BCE, in favor of Free Marriage which did not grant a husband any rights over his wife or have any changing effect on a woman's status.[64] During the classical era of Roman law, marriage required no ceremony, but only a mutual will and agreement to live together in harmony. Marriage ceremonies, contracts, and other formalities were meant only to prove that a couple had, in fact, married. Under early or archaic Roman law, marriages were of three kinds: confarreatio, symbolized by the sharing of bread (panis farreus); coemptio, "by purchase"; and usus, by mutual cohabitation. Patricians always married by confarreatio, while plebeians married by the latter two kinds. In marriage by usus, if a woman was absent for three consecutive nights at least once a year, she would avoid her husband establishing legal control over her. This differed from the Athenian custom of arranged marriage and sequestered wives who were not supposed to walk in the street unescorted. The form of marriage known as manus was the norm in the early Republic, but became less frequent thereafter.[65] Under this early form of marriage, the bride passed into the "hand" (manus) of her husband; that is, she was transferred from the potestas of her father to that of her husband. Her dowry, any inheritance rights transferred through her marriage, and any property acquired by her after marriage belonged to him. Husbands could divorce on grounds of adultery, and a few cases of divorce for a wife's infertility are recorded.[66] Manus marriage was an unequal relationship; it changed a woman’s intestate heirs from her siblings to her children, not because she was their mother, but because in law her position was the same as that of a daughter to her husband. Under manus, women were expected to obey their husbands in almost all aspects of their lives. This archaic form of manus marriage was largely abandoned by the time of Julius Caesar, when a woman remained under her father's authority by law even when she moved into her husband's home. This arrangement was one of the factors in the independence Roman women enjoyed relative to those of many other ancient cultures and up to the modern period:[67] So-called "free" marriage caused no change in personal status for either the wife or the husband.[68] Free marriage usually involved two citizens, or a citizen and a person who held Latin rights, and in the later Imperial period and with official permission, soldier-citizens and non-citizens. In a free marriage a bride brought a dowry to the husband: if the marriage ended with no cause of adultery he returned most of it.[69] So total was the law's separation of property that gifts between spouses were not recognized as such; if a couple divorced or even lived apart, the giver could reclaim the gift.[70] Divorce[edit] Fresco of a seated woman from Stabiae, 1st century AD Divorce was a legal but relatively informal affair which mainly involved a wife leaving her husband’s house and taking back her dowry. According to the historian Valerius Maximus, divorces were taking place by 604 BCE or earlier, and the law code as embodied in the mid-5th century BCE by the Twelve Tables provides for divorce. Divorce was socially acceptable if carried out within social norms (mos maiorum). By the time of Cicero and Julius Caesar, divorce was relatively common and "shame-free," the subject of gossip rather than a social disgrace.[71] Valerius says that Lucius Annius was disapproved of because he divorced his wife without consulting his friends; that is, he undertook the action for his own purposes and without considering its effects on his social network (amicitia and clientela). The censors of 307 BCE thus expelled him from the Senate for moral turpitude. Elsewhere, however, it is claimed that the first divorce took place only in 230 BCE, at which time Dionysius of Halicarnassus notes[72] that "Spurius Carvilius, a man of distinction, was the first to divorce his wife" on grounds of infertility. This was most likely the Spurius Carvilius Maximus Ruga who was consul in 234 and 228 BCE. The evidence is confused.[73] During the classical period of Roman law (late Republic and Principate), a man or woman[74] could end a marriage simply because he or she wanted to, and for no other reason. Unless the wife could prove the spouse was worthless, he kept the children. Because property had been kept separate during the marriage, divorce from a "free" marriage was a very easy procedure.[75] Remarriage[edit] Heracles and Omphale, Roman fresco, Pompeian Fourth Style (45–79 AD), Naples National Archaeological Museum, Italy The frequency of remarriage among the elite was high. Speedy remarriage was not unusual, and perhaps even customary, for aristocratic Romans after the death of a spouse.[76] While no formal waiting period was dictated for a widower, it was customary for a woman to remain in mourning for ten months before remarrying.[77] The duration may allow for pregnancy: if a woman had become pregnant just before her husband's death, the period of ten months ensures that no question of paternity, which might affect the child's social status and inheritance, would attach to the birth.[78] No law prohibited pregnant women from marrying, and there are well-known instances: Augustus married Livia when she was carrying her former husband's child, and the College of Pontiffs ruled that it was permissible as long as the child's father was determined first. Livia's previous husband even attended the wedding.[79] Because elite marriages often occurred for reasons of politics or property, a widow or divorcée with assets in these areas faced few obstacles to remarrying. She was far more likely to be legally emancipated than a first-time bride, and to have a say in the choice of husband. The marriages of Fulvia, who commanded troops during the last civil war of the Republic and who was the first Roman woman to have her face on a coin, are thought to indicate her own political sympathies and ambitions: she was married first to the popularist champion Clodius Pulcher, who was murdered in the street after a long feud with Cicero; then to Scribonius Curio, a figure of less ideological certitude who at the time of his death had come over to Julius Caesar; and finally to Mark Antony, the last opponent to the republican oligarchs and to Rome's future first emperor. The Greek observer Plutarch indicates that a second wedding among Romans was likely to be a quieter affair, as a widow would still feel the absence of her dead husband, and a divorcée ought to feel shame.[80] But while the circumstances of divorce might be shameful or embarrassing, and remaining married to the same person for life was ideal, there was no general disapproval of remarriage; on the contrary, marriage was considered the right and desirable condition of adult life for both men and women.[81] Cato the Younger, who presented himself as a paragon modeled after his moral namesake, allowed his pregnant wife Marcia to divorce him and marry Hortensius, declining to offer his young daughter to the 60-year-old orator instead. After the widowed Marcia inherited considerable wealth, Cato married her again, in a ceremony lacking many of the formalities.[82] Women might be mocked, however, for marrying too often or capriciously, particularly if it could be implied that sexual appetites and vanity were motives.[83] Concubinage[edit] Further information: Concubinage in ancient Rome Roman fresco with a banquet scene from the Casa dei Casti Amanti, Pompeii A concubine was defined by Roman law as a woman living in a permanent monogamous relationship with a man not her husband.[84] There was no dishonor in being a concubine or living with a concubine, and a concubine could become a wife.[85] Gifts could be exchanged between the partners in concubinage, in contrast to marriage, which maintained a more defined separation of property. Couples usually resorted to concubinage when inequality of social rank was an obstacle to marriage: for instance, a man of senatorial rank, and a woman who was a social inferior, such as a freedwoman or one who had a questionable background of poverty or prostitution.[86] Two partners who lacked the right to the form of legal marriage known as conubium might enter into concubinage, or even a highborn woman who loved a man of low social status.[87] Concubinage differed from marriage chiefly in the status of children born from the relationship. Children had their mother's social rank, and not as was customary their father's. Domestic abuse[edit] A maenad with a cupid in her arms, fresco, 1st century AD Classical Roman law did not allow any domestic abuse by a husband to his wife,[88] but as with any other crime, laws against domestic abuse can be assumed to fail to prevent it. Cato the Elder said, according to his biographer Plutarch, "that the man who struck his wife or child, laid violent hands on the holiest of holy things. Also that he thought it more praiseworthy to be a good husband than a good senator."[89] A man of status during the Roman Republic was expected to behave moderately toward his wife and to define himself as a good husband. Wife beating was sufficient grounds for divorce or other legal action against the husband.[90] Domestic abuse enters the historical record mainly when it involves the egregious excesses of the elite. The Emperor Nero was alleged to have had his first wife (and stepsister) Claudia Octavia murdered, after subjecting her to torture and imprisonment. Nero then married his pregnant mistress Poppaea Sabina, whom he kicked to death for criticizing him.[91] Some modern historians believe that Poppaea died from a miscarriage or childbirth, and that the story was exaggerated to vilify Nero. The despised Commodus is supposed also to have killed his wife and his sister.[92] Motherhood[edit] Mother nursing an infant in the presence of the father, detail from a young boy's sarcophagus ca. 150 CE Roman wives were expected to bear children, but the women of the aristocracy, accustomed to a degree of independence, showed a growing disinclination to devote themselves to traditional motherhood. By the 1st century CE, most elite women avoided breast-feeding their infants themselves, and hired wet-nurses.[93] The practice was not uncommon as early as the 2nd century BCE, when the comic playwright Plautus mentions wet-nurses casually.[94] Since a mother's milk was considered best for the baby,[95] aristocratic women might still choose to breast-feed, unless physical reasons prevented it.[96] If a woman chose to forgo nursing her own child she could visit the Columna Lactaria ("Milk Column"), where poor parents could obtain milk for their infants as charity from wet nurses, and those who could afford it could choose to hire a wet nurse.[97] Licinia, the wife of Cato the Elder (d. 149 BCE), is reported to have nursed not only her son, but sometimes the infants of her slaves, to encourage "brotherly affection" among them.[98] By the time of Tacitus (d. 117 CE), breastfeeding by elite matrons was idealized as a practice of the virtuous old days.[99] Large families were not the norm among the elite even by the Late Republic; the family of Clodius Pulcher, who had at least three sisters and two brothers, was considered unusual.[100] The birth rate among the aristocracy declined to such an extent that the first Roman emperor Augustus (reigned 27 BCE–14 CE) passed a series of laws intended to increase it, including special honors for women who bore at least three children (the ius trium liberorum).[101] Those who were unmarried, divorced, widowed, or barren were prohibited from inheriting property unless named in a will.[102] The extent to which Roman women might expect their husbands to participate in the rearing of very young children seems to vary and is hard to determine. Family-values traditionalists such as Cato appear to have taken an interest: Cato liked to be present when his wife bathed and swaddled their child.[103] Roman women were not only valued for the number of children that they produced, but also for their part in raising and educating children to become good citizens. To rear children for successful lives, an exemplary Roman mother needed to be well-educated herself.[104] One of the Roman women most famous for their strength and influence as a mother was Cornelia, the mother of the Gracchi. Julius Caesar, whose father died when he was only a young teen, had a close relationship with his mother, Aurelia, whose political clout was essential in preventing the execution of her 18-year-old son during the proscriptions of Sulla. Daily life[edit] Left image: Wall painting from the Vila San Marco, Stabiae, 1st century Right image: A woman fixing her hair in the mirror, fresco from the Villa of Arianna at Stabiae, 1st century AD Aristocratic women managed a large and complex household. Since wealthy couples often owned multiple homes and country estates with dozens or even hundreds of slaves, some of whom were educated and highly skilled, this responsibility was the equivalent of running a small corporation. In addition to the social and political importance of entertaining guests, clients, and visiting dignitaries from abroad, the husband held his morning business meetings (salutatio) at home.[105] The home (domus) was also the center of the family's social identity, with ancestral portraits displayed in the entrance hall (atrium). Since the most ambitious aristocratic men were frequently away from home on military campaign or administrative duty in the provinces, sometimes for years at a time, the maintenance of the family's property and business decisions were often left to the wives; for instance, while Julius Caesar was away from Rome throughout the 50s BCE, his wife Calpurnia was responsible for taking care of his assets. When Ovid, Rome's greatest living poet, was exiled by Augustus in 8 CE, his wife exploited social connections and legal maneuvers to hold on to the family's property, on which their livelihood depended.[106] Ovid expresses his love and admiration for her lavishly in the poetry he wrote during his exile.[107] Frugality, parsimony, and austerity were characteristics of the virtuous matron.[108] One of the most important tasks for women is to oversee in a large household was clothing production. In the early Roman period, the spinning of wool was a central domestic occupation, and indicated a family's self-sufficiency, since the wool would be produced on their estates. Even in an urban setting, wool was often a symbol of a wife's duties, and equipment for spinning might appear on the funeral monument of a woman to show that she was a good and honorable matron.[109] Even women of the upper classes were expected to be able to spin and weave in virtuous emulation of their rustic ancestors — a practice ostentatiously observed by Livia. In business[edit] "One of the most curious characteristics of that age," observed French classical scholar Gaston Boissier, "was that the women appear as much engaged in business and as interested in speculations as the men. Money is their first care. They work their estates, invest their funds, lend and borrow. We find one among Cicero's creditors, and two among his debtors."[110] Although Roman society did not allow women to gain official political power, it did allow them to enter business.[111] Even women of wealth were not supposed to be idle ladies of leisure. Among the aristocracy, women as well as men lent money to their peers to avoid resorting to a moneylender. When Pliny was considering buying an estate, he factored in a loan from his mother-in-law as a guarantee rather than an option.[112] Women also joined in funding public works, as is frequently documented by inscriptions during the Imperial period. The "lawless" Politta, who appears in the Martyrdom of Pionius, owned estates in the province of Asia. Inscriptions record her generosity in funding the renovation of the Sardis gymnasium.[113] Because women had the right to own property, they might engage in the same business transactions and management practices as any landowner. As with their male counterparts, their management of slaves appears to have varied from relative care to negligence and outright abuse. During the First Servile War, Megallis and her husband Damophilus were both killed by their slaves on account of their brutality, but their daughter was spared because of her kindness and granted safe passage out of Sicily, along with an armed escort.[114] Women and a man working alongside one another at a dye shop (fullonica), on a wall painting from Pompeii Unlike landholding, industry was not considered an honorable profession for those of senatorial rank. Cicero suggested that in order to gain respectability a merchant should buy land. Attitudes changed during the Empire, however, and Claudius created legislation to encourage the upper classes to engage in shipping. Women of the upper classes are documented as owning and running shipping corporations. Trade and manufacturing are not well represented in Roman literature, which was produced for and largely by the elite, but funerary inscriptions sometimes record the profession of the deceased, including women.[115] Women are known to have owned and operated brick factories.[116] A woman might develop skills to complement her husband's trade, or manage aspects of his business. Artemis the gilder was married to Dionysius the helmet maker, as indicated by a curse tablet asking for the destruction of their household, workshop, work, and livelihood.[117] The status of ordinary women who owned a business seems to have been regarded as exceptional. Laws during the Imperial period aimed at punishing women for adultery exempted those "who have charge of any business or shop" from prosecution.[118] Some typical occupations for a woman would be wet nurse, actress, dancer or acrobat, prostitute, and midwife — not all of equal respectability.[119] Prostitutes and performers such as actresses were stigmatized as infames, people who had recourse to few legal protections even if they were free.[120] Inscriptions indicate that a woman who was a wet nurse (nutrix) would be quite proud of her occupation.[121] Women could be scribes and secretaries, including "girls trained for beautiful writing," that is, calligraphers.[122] Pliny gives a list of female artists and their paintings.[123] Most Romans lived in insulae (apartment buildings), and those housing the poorer plebeian and non-citizen families usually lacked kitchens. The need to buy prepared food meant that takeaway food was a thriving business. Most of the Roman poor, whether male or female, young or old, earned a living through their own labour. In politics[edit] The heroic suicide of Porcia, daughter of Cato and wife of Brutus, as pictured by Pierre Mignard Men argued firmly to block women from engaging in the public sphere. The political system in ancient Rome involved men exclusively—from senators to magistrates. Women were even prevented from voting. They were not seen as fit to be part of the political sphere as men believed them to be only suited for "elegance, adornment, and finery."[43] However, elite women could manipulate their husbands and through them exercise control over the political world. In some cases, women were viewed as a threat to male rule. Cato the Censor went so far as to prevent boys from attending senatorial meetings in fear that they would relay the news to their inquisitive mothers.[124] During the civil wars that ended the Republic, Appian reports the heroism of wives who saved their husbands. An epitaph known as the Laudatio Turiae preserves a husband's eulogy for his wife, who during the civil war following the death of Julius Caesar endangered her own life and relinquished her jewelry to send support to her husband in exile.[125] Both survived the turbulence of the time to enjoy a long marriage. Porcia, the daughter of Cato the Younger and wife of Brutus the assassin, came to a less fortunate but (in the eyes of her time) heroic end: she killed herself as the Republic collapsed, just as her father did. The rise of Augustus to sole power in the last decades of the 1st century BCE diminished the power of political officeholders and the traditional oligarchy, but did nothing to diminish and arguably increased the opportunities for women, as well as slaves and freedmen, to exercise influence behind the scenes.[126] Before this point, women's political power was extremely curtailed compared to the power men held by preventing their right to vote. However, starting with Augustus' rule, the inability to vote no longer mattered because the senate lost its power. Additionally, the shift from the forum to the palace allowed for women who lived there to gain an upper hand in influencing politics.[43] One notable woman was Livia Drusilla Augusta (58 BCE – CE 29), the wife of Augustus and the most powerful woman in the early Roman Empire, acting several times as regent and being Augustus' faithful advisor. Several women of the Imperial family, such as Livia's great-granddaughter and Caligula's sister Agrippina the Younger, gained political influence as well as public prominence. Women also participated in efforts to overthrow emperors, predominantly for personal gain. Shortly after Caligula's sister Drusilla died, her widower Marcus Aemilius Lepidus and her sisters Agrippina the Younger and Livilla conspired to overthrow Caligula. The plot was discovered, and Lepidus was executed. Agrippina and Livilla were exiled, and returned from exile only when their paternal uncle Claudius came to power after Caligula's assassination in 41 CE. In turn, Claudius's third wife Valeria Messalina conspired with Gaius Silius to overthrow her husband in the hope of installing herself and her lover in power. Tacitus immortalized the woman Epicharis for her part in the Pisonian conspiracy, where she attempted to gain the support of the Roman fleet and was instead arrested.[127] Once the conspiracy was uncovered, she would reveal nothing even under torture, in contrast to the senators, who were not subjected to torture and yet raced to spill the details. Tacitus also praises Egnatia Maximilla for sacrificing her fortune in order to stand by her innocent husband against Nero.[128] According to the Historia Augusta (Elagabalus 4.2 and 12.3) emperor Elagabalus had his mother or grandmother take part in Senate proceedings. "And Elagabalus was the only one of all the emperors under whom a woman attended the senate like a man, just as though she belonged to the senatorial order" (David Magie's translation). According to the same work, Elagabalus also established a women's senate called the senaculum, which enacted rules to be applied to matrons, regarding clothing, chariot riding, the wearing of jewelry etc. (Elagabalus 4.3 and Aurelian 49.6). Before this, Agrippina the Younger, mother of Nero, had been listening to Senate proceedings, concealed behind a curtain, according to Tacitus (Annales, 13.5). Women and the military[edit] Classical texts have little to say about women and the Roman army. Emperor Augustus (reigned 27 BC–AD 14) disallowed marriage by ordinary soldiers, a ban that lasted nearly two centuries. However it has been suggested that wives and children of centurions lived with them at border and provincial forts.[129] Shoes in women's and children's sizes were found at Vindolanda[130] (site of a Roman fort on Hadrian's wall in northern England), along with bronze plaques, awarded to provincial soldiers whose 25 years of service earned them Roman citizenship, that mention their wives and children. Likewise, in Germany, further evidence of this practice was discovered in the form of brooches and shoes. Trajan's Column depicts six women amongst the soldiers who are attendants holding sacrificial offerings at a military religious ceremony.[131] Religious life[edit] Ruins of the House of the Vestals, with pedestals for statuary in the foreground Women were present at most Roman festivals and cult observances. Some rituals specifically required the presence of women, but their participation might be limited. As a rule women did not perform animal sacrifice, the central rite of most major public ceremonies,[132] though this was less a matter of prohibition than the fact that most priests presiding over state religion were men.[133] Some cult practices were reserved for women only, for example, the rites of the Good Goddess (Bona Dea).[134] Women priests played a prominent and crucial role in the official religion of Rome. Although the state colleges of male priests were far more numerous, the six women of the college of Vestals were Rome's only "full-time professional clergy."[135] Sacerdos, plural sacerdotes, was the Latin word for a priest of either gender. Religious titles for women include sacerdos, often in relation to a deity or temple, such as a sacerdos Cereris or Cerealis, "priestess of Ceres", an office never held by men;[136] magistra, a high priestess, female expert or teacher in religious matters; and ministra, a female assistant, particularly one in service to a deity. A magistra or ministra would have been responsible for the regular maintenance of a cult. Epitaphs provide the main evidence for these priesthoods, and the woman is often not identified in terms of her marital status.[137] The Vestals possessed unique religious distinction, public status and privileges, and could exercise considerable political influence. It was also possible for them to amass "considerable wealth."[138] Upon entering her office, a Vestal was emancipated from her father's authority. In archaic Roman society, these priestesses were the only women not required to be under the legal guardianship of a man, instead answering directly and only to the Pontifex Maximus.[139] Their vow of chastity freed them of the traditional obligation to marry and rear children, but its violation carried a heavy penalty: a Vestal found to have polluted her office by breaking her vow was given food, water, and entombed alive. The independence of the Vestals thus existed in relation to the prohibitions imposed on them. In addition to conducting certain religious rites, the Vestals participated at least symbolically in every official sacrifice, as they were responsible for preparing the required ritual substance mola salsa.[140] The Vestals seem to have retained their religious and social distinctions well into the 4th century CE, until the Christian emperors dissolved the order. A few priesthoods were held jointly by married couples. Marriage was a requirement for the Flamen Dialis, the high priest of Jupiter; his wife, the Flaminica Dialis, had her own unique priestly attire, and like her husband was placed under obscure magico-religious prohibitions. The flaminica was a perhaps exceptional case of a woman performing animal sacrifice; she offered a ram to Jupiter on each of the nundinae, the eight-day Roman cycle comparable to a week.[141] The couple were not permitted to divorce, and if the flaminica died the flamen had to resign his office. The Capitoline Triad of Minerva, Jupiter, and Juno Like the Flaminica Dialis, the regina sacrorum, "queen of the sacred rites," wore distinctive ceremonial dress and performed animal sacrifice, offering a sow or female lamb to Juno on the first day of each month.[142] The names of some reginae sacrorum are recorded by inscriptions.[143] The regina was the wife of the rex sacrorum, "king of the sacred rites," an archaic priesthood regarded in the earliest period as more prestigious than even the Pontifex Maximus.[144] These highly public official duties for women contradict the commonplace notion that women in ancient Rome took part only in private or domestic religion. The dual male-female priesthoods may reflect the Roman tendency to seek a gender complement within the religious sphere;[145] most divine powers are represented by both a male and a female deity, as seen in divine pairs such as Liber and Libera.[146] The twelve major gods were presented as six gender-balanced pairs,[147] and Roman religion departed from Indo-European tradition in installing two goddesses in its supreme triad of patron deities, Juno and Minerva along with Jupiter. This triad "formed the core of Roman religion."[148] Mosaic depicting masked actors in a play: two women consult a "witch" or private diviner From the Mid Republic onward, religious diversity became increasingly characteristic of the city of Rome. Many religions that were not part of Rome's earliest state cult offered leadership roles for women, among them the cult of Isis and of the Magna Mater. An epitaph preserves the title sacerdos maxima for a woman who held the highest priesthood of the Magna Mater's temple near the current site of St. Peter's Basilica.[149] Although less documented than public religion, private religious practices addressed aspects of life that were exclusive to women. At a time when the infant mortality rate was as high as 40 percent,[150] divine aid was solicited for the life-threatening act of giving birth and the perils of caring for a baby. Invocations were directed at the goddesses Juno, Diana, Lucina, the di nixi, and a host of divine attendants devoted to birth and childrearing. Male writers vary in their depiction of women's religiosity: some represent women as paragons of Roman virtue and devotion, but also inclined by temperament to excessive religious devotion, the lure of magic, or "superstition".[151] Nor was "private" the same as "secret": Romans were suspicious of secretive religious practices, and Cicero cautioned that nocturnal sacrifices were not to be performed by women, except for those ritually prescribed pro populo, on behalf of the Roman people, that is, for the public good.[152] Social activities[edit] Mosaic showing Roman women in various recreational activities Wealthy women traveled around the city in a litter carried by slaves.[153] Women gathered in the streets on a daily basis to meet with friends, attend religious rites at temples, or to visit the baths. The wealthiest families had private baths at home, but most people went to bath houses not only to wash but to socialize, as the larger facilities offered a range of services and recreational activities, among which casual sex was not excluded. One of the most vexed questions of Roman social life is whether the sexes bathed together in public. Until the late Republic, evidence suggests that women usually bathed in a separate wing or facility, or that women and men were scheduled at different times. But there is also clear evidence of mixed bathing from the late Republic until the rise of Christian dominance in the later Empire. Some scholars have thought that only lower-class women bathed with men, or those of dubious moral standing such as entertainers or prostitutes, but Clement of Alexandria observed that women of the highest social classes could be seen naked at the baths. Hadrian prohibited mixed bathing, but the ban seems not to have endured. Most likely, customs varied not only by time and place, but by facility, so that women could choose to segregate themselves by gender or not.[154] For entertainment women could attend debates at the Forum, the public games (ludi), chariot races, and theatrical performances. By the late Republic, they regularly attended dinner parties, though in earlier times the women of a household dined in private together.[155] Conservatives such as Cato the Censor (234–149 BCE) considered it improper for women to take a more active role in public life; his complaints indicated that indeed some women did voice their opinions in the public sphere.[156] Though the practice was discouraged, Roman generals would sometimes take their wives with them on military campaigns. Caligula's mother Agrippina the Elder often accompanied her husband Germanicus on his campaigns in northern Germania, and the emperor Claudius was born in Gaul for this reason. Wealthy women might tour the empire, often participating or viewing religious ceremonies and sites around the empire.[157] Rich women traveled to the countryside during the summer when Rome became too hot.[158] For more on how women fit into social classes in ancient Rome, see Social Class in ancient Rome. Attire and adornment[edit] Livia attired in a stola and palla See also: Cosmetics in ancient Rome and Clothing in ancient Rome Women in ancient Rome took great care in their appearance, though extravagance was frowned upon. They wore cosmetics and made different concoctions for their skin. Ovid even wrote a poem about the correct application of makeup. Women used white chalk or arsenic to whiten their faces, or rouge made of lead or carmine to add color to their cheeks as well as using lead to highlight their eyes.[159] They spent much time arranging their hair and often dyed it black, red, or blonde. They also wore wigs regularly.[160] Matrons usually wore two simple tunics for undergarments covered by a stola. The stola was a long white dress that was cinched at the waist and which fell to the wearer’s feet, secured by clasps at the shoulder. Wealthier women would decorate their stola further. When going out a woman wore a palla over her stola, which was held by a clasp at the shoulder.[161] Young women were not permitted to wear a stola, and instead wore tunics.[162] Prostitutes and those caught committing adultery put on the male toga.[163] Wealthy women wore jewels such as emeralds, aquamarine, opal, and pearls as earrings, necklaces, rings and sometimes sewn onto their shoes and clothing.[164] Exaggerated hairstyle of the Flavian period (80s–90s CE) In the aftermath of Roman defeat at Cannae, economic crisis provoked the passing of the Lex Oppia (215 BCE) to restrict personal and public extravagance. The law limited women's possession and display of gold and silver (as money or personal ornament), expensive clothing and their "unnecessary" use of chariots and litters. Victory over Carthage flooded Rome with wealth and in 195 BCE the Lex Oppia was reviewed. The ruling consul, Cato the Censor argued for its retention: personal morality and self-restraint were self-evidently inadequate controls on indulgence and luxury. Luxury provoked the envy and shame of those less well-off, and was therefore divisive. Roman women, in Cato's view, had showed only too clearly that their appetites once corrupted knew no limits, and must be restrained. Large numbers of Roman matrons thought otherwise, and made concerted public protest. In 193 BCE the laws were abolished: Cato's opposition did not harm his political career. Later, in 42 BCE, Roman women, led by Hortensia, successfully protested against laws designed to tax Roman women, by use of the argument of no taxation without representation.[165] Evidence of a lessening on luxury restrictions can also be found; one of the Letters of Pliny is addressed to the woman Pompeia Celerina praising the luxuries she keeps in her villa.[166] Body image[edit] Venus, goddess of beauty and love (2nd century) Based on Roman art and literature, small breasts and wide hips were the ideal body type for women considered alluring by Roman men.[167] Roman art from the Augustan period shows idealized women as substantial and fleshy, with a full abdomen and breasts that are rounded,[168] not pendulous.[169] Prostitutes depicted in Roman erotic art have fleshy bodies and wide hips, and often have their breasts covered by a strophium (a sort of strapless bra) even when otherwise nude and performing sex acts.[170] Large breasts were mocked as humorous or a sign of old age.[171] Young girls wore a strophium secured tightly in the belief that it would inhibit the growth of breasts,[172] and a regimen of massaging the breasts with hemlock, begun while a woman was still a virgin, was thought to prevent sagging.[173] Breasts receive relatively minimal attention in erotic art and literature as a sexual focus;[174] the breast was associated primarily with nursing infants and a woman's role as a mother.[175] In times of extreme emotional duress, such as mourning or captivity in wartime, women might bare their breasts as an apotropaic gesture.[176] Mos maiorum and the love poets[edit] See also: Sexuality in ancient Rome Romantic scene from a mosaic (Villa at Centocelle, Rome, 20 BCE–20 CE) During the late Republic penalties for sexuality were barely enforced if at all,[177] and a new erotic ideal of romantic relationship emerges. Subverting the tradition of male dominance, the love poets of the late Republic and Augustan era declared their eagerness to submit to "love slavery" (servitium amoris). Catullus addresses a number of poems to "Lesbia," a married woman with whom he has an affair, usually identified as a fictionalized Clodia, sister of the prominent popularist politician Clodius Pulcher. The affair ends badly, and Catullus's declarations of love turn to attacks on her sexual appetites — rhetoric that accords with the other hostile source on Clodia's behavior, Cicero's Pro Caelio. In The Art of Love, Ovid goes a step further, adopting the genre of didactic poetry for offering instruction in how to pursue, keep, and get over a lover. Satirists such as Juvenal complain about the dissolute behavior of women.[178] Gynecology and medicine[edit] The practices and views in the Hippocratic Corpus regarding women's bodies and their perceived weaknesses were inadequate for addressing the needs of women in the Hellenistic and Roman eras, when women led active lives and more often engaged in family planning. The physiology of women began to be seen as less alien to that of men.[179] In the older tradition, intercourse, pregnancy, and childbirth were not only central to women's health, but the raison d'être for female physiology;[180] men, by contrast, were advised to exercise moderation in their sexual behavior, since hypersexuality would cause disease and fatigue.[181] A female artist paints a statue of the phallic god Priapus The Hippocratic view that amenorrhea was fatal became by Roman times a specific issue of infertility, and was recognized by most Roman medical writers as a likely result when women engage in intensive physical regimens for extended periods of time. Balancing food, exercise, and sexual activity came to be regarded as a choice that women might make. The observation that intensive training was likely to result in amenorrhea implies that there were women who engaged in such regimens.[182] In the Roman era, medical writers saw a place for exercise in the lives of women in sickness and health. Soranus recommends playing ball, swimming, walking, reading aloud, riding in vehicles, and travel as recreation, which would promote overall good health.[183] In examining the causes of undesired childlessness, these later gynecological writers include information about sterility in men, rather than assuming some defect in the woman only.[184] Hypersexuality was to be avoided by women as well as men. An enlarged clitoris, like an oversized phallus,[185] was considered a symptom of excessive sexuality. Although Hellenistic and Roman medical and other writers refer to clitoridectomy as primarily an "Egyptian" custom, gynecological manuals under the Christian Empire in late antiquity propose that hypersexuality could be treated by surgery or repeated childbirth.[186] Slavery[edit] See also: Freedman and Manumission Left image: A young woman sits while a servant fixes her hair with the help of a cupid, who holds up a mirror to offer a reflection, detail of a fresco from the Villa of the Mysteries, Pompeii, c. 50 BC Right image: A floor mosaic of a woman dancer from the Villa Romana del Casale, 4th century AD Freedwomen were manumitted slaves. A freed slave owed a period of service, the terms of which might be agreed upon as a precondition of freedom, to her former owner, who became her patron. The patron had obligations in return, such as paying for said services and helping in legal matters. The patron-client relationship was one of the fundamental social structures of ancient Rome, and failure to fulfill one's obligations brought disapproval and censure. In most ways, freedwomen had the same legal status as freeborn women. But because under Roman law a slave had no father, freed slaves had no inheritance rights unless they were named in a will. The relationship of a former slave to her patron could be complicated. In one legal case, a woman named Petronia Iusta attempted to show — without a birth declaration to prove it — that she had been free-born. Her mother, she acknowledged, had been a slave in the household of Petronius Stephanus and Calatoria Themis, but Iusta maintained that she had been born after her mother's manumission. Calatoria, by now a widow, in turn argued that Iusta was born before her mother was free and that she had been manumitted, therefore owing her former owner the service due a patron. Calatoria could produce no documentation of this supposed manumission, and the case came down to the testimony of witnesses.[187] The status of freedwomen, like freedmen, varied widely. Caenis was a freedwoman and secretary to the Emperor Vespasian; she was also his concubine. He is said to have lived with her faithfully, but she was not considered a wife.[188] Prostitution[edit] Main article: Prostitution in ancient Rome Women could turn to prostitution to support themselves, but not all prostitutes had freedom to decide. There is some evidence that even slave prostitutes could benefit from their labor.[189] Although rape was a crime, the law only punished the rape of a slave if it "damaged the goods," because a slave had no legal standing. The penalty was aimed at providing her owner compensation for the "damage" of his property. Because a slave woman was considered property under Roman law, forcing her to be a prostitute was not considered a crime. Prior to Septimius Severus, women who engaged in acts that brought infamia to them as slaves also suffered infamia when freed.[190] Sometimes sellers of female slaves attached a ne serva clause to the slave to prevent her from being prostituted. The Ne Serva clause meant that if the new owner or any owner after him or her used the slave as a prostitute she would be free. Later on the ne serva agreements became enforceable by law.[191] Prostitution was not limited to slaves or poor citizens; according to Suetonius, Caligula when converting his palace into a brothel employed upper class "matrons and youths" as prostitutes. Suetonius, The Twelve Caesars, Life of Caligula, Tacitus records that during one of Nero's feasts the prefect Tigellinus had brothels filled with upper class women.[192] Prostitution could also be a punishment instead of an occupation; a law of Augustus allowed that women guilty of adultery could be sentenced to work in brothels as prostitutes. The law was abolished in 389.[193] See also[edit] Ancient Rome portal List of Roman women List of Roman birth and childhood deities Sexuality in ancient Rome Women in ancient Sparta Women in Classical Athens Women in ancient warfare References[edit] ^ Jasper Burns, "Sabina," in Great Women of Imperial Rome: Mothers and Wives of the Caesars (Routledge, 2007), pp. 124–140. ^ The form of Roman marriage called conubium, for instance, requires that both spouses be citizens; like men from towns granted civitas sine suffragio, women (at least those eligible for conubium) were citizens without suffrage. The legal status of a mother as a citizen affected her son's citizenship. All Roman citizens recognized as such by law did not hold equal rights and privileges, particularly in regard to holding high office. See A Casebook on Roman Family Law following, and A.N. Sherwin-White, Roman Citizenship (Oxford University Press, 1979), pp. 211 and 268 online (on male citizenship as it relates to marrying citizen women) et passim. ("children born of two Roman citizens") indicates that a Roman woman was regarded as having citizen status, in specific contrast to a peregrina. ^ Bruce W. Frier and Thomas A.J. McGinn, A Casebook on Roman Family Law (Oxford University Press: American Philological Association, 2004), pp. 31–32, 457, et passim. ^ Kristina Milnor, "Women in Roman Historiography," in The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Historians (Cambridge University Press, 2009), p. 278; Ann Ellis Hanson, "The Restructuring of Female Physiology at Rome," in Les écoles médicales à Rome: Actes du 2ème Colloque international sur les textes médicaux latins antiques, Lausanne, septembre 1986 (Université de Nantes, 1991), p. 256. ^ Unless otherwise noted, this introductory overview is based on Beryl Rawson, "Finding Roman Women," in A Companion to the Roman Republic (Blackwell, 2010), p. 325. ^ Kelly Olson, "The Appearance of the Young Roman Girl," in Roman Dress and the Fabrics of Roman Culture (University of Toronto Press, 2008), p. 139. ^ In reference to his character assassination of the notorious Clodia; see Pro Caelio. ^ For an extensive modern consideration of the Vestals, see Ariadne Staples, From Good Goddess to Vestal Virgins: Sex and Category in Roman Religion (Routledge, 1998). ^ Beryl Rawson, Children and Childhood in Roman Italy (Oxford University Press, 2003), pp. 129–130. ^ Rawson, Children and Childhood in Roman Italy, p. 128, citing Persius 2.70 and the related scholion, and p. 48 on Diana. Rome lacked the elaborate puberty rites for girls that were practiced in ancient Greece (p. 145). ^ a b Beryl Rawson, "The Roman Family in Italy" (Oxford University Press, 1999), p. 21. ^ Judith P. Hallett, Fathers and Daughters in Roman Society: Women and the Elite Family (Princeton University Press, 1984), 142. ^ a b Lauren, Caldwell, "Roman Girlhood and the Fashioning of Femininity" (Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 3–4. ^ a b Caldwell, "Roman Girlhood and the Fashioning of Femininity", p. 16. ^ Caldwell, "Roman Girlhood and the Fashioning of Femininity", pp. 106–107. ^ Caldwell, "Roman Girlhood and the Fashioning of Femininity", p. 18. ^ Rawson, Children and Childhood in Roman Italy, pp. 197–198 ^ Caldwell, "Roman Girlhood and the Fashioning of Femininity", p. 17. ^ Rawson, Children and Childhood in Roman Italy, p. 198. ^ Janine Assa, The Great Roman Ladies (New York, 1960), p. 50. ^ Beryl Rawson, "The Roman Family," in The Family in Ancient Rome: New Perspectives (Cornell University Press, 1986), pp. 30, 40–41. ^ Caldwell, "Roman Girlhood and the Fashioning of Femininity", p. 2. ^ Plutarch, Life of Pompey 55 LacusCurtius edition. ^ Sandra R. Joshel, Sheila Murnaghan, "Women and Slaves in Greco-Roman Culture" (Routledge; New edition 2001), p. 86. ^ Caldwell, "Roman Girlhood and the Fashioning of Femininity", pp. 15–16. ^ Rawson, "The Roman Family," p. 40. ^ Rawson, Children and Childhood in Roman Italy, p. 45. ^ Rawson, Children and Childhood in Roman Italy, p. 197. ^ Caldwell, "Roman Girlhood and the Fashioning of Femininity", pp. 11, 45–46. ^ Mary T. Boatwright, Daniel J. Gargola, Noel Lenski, Richard J. A. Talbert, "A Brief History of The Romans" (Oxford University Press; 2 edition, 2013), p. 176. ^ Frier, A Casebook on Roman Family Law, pp. 19–20. ^ Beryl Rawson, "The Roman Family," in The Family in Ancient Rome: New Perspectives (Cornell University Press, 1986), p. 18. ^ Frier, A Casebook on Roman Family Law, p. 66. ^ J.A. Crook, Law and Life of Rome 90B.C.-212 A.D. ^ Judith P. Hallett, Fathers and Daughters in Roman Society: Women and the Elite Family (Princeton University Press, 1984), 142. ^ Rawson, "The Roman Family", p. 21. ^ Bruce W. Frier and Thomas A.J. McGinn, A Casebook on Roman Family Law (Oxford University Press, 2004), p. 20. ^ a b Frier and McGinn, Casebook, pp. 19–20. ^ "If adults sons or daughters and their children had lived in the same household as the paterfamilias," notes Rawson, "they may well have found the constant awareness of his powers and position a great strain" ("The Roman Family," p. 15). ^ Hallett, 139. ^ Rawson, The Roman Family, p. 21. ^ Rawson, "The Roman Family," p. 18. ^ a b c d Bauman, Richard (1992). Women and Politics in Ancient Rome. New York, New York: Routledge. pp. 8, 10, 15, 105. ^ Harlow, Mary, and Ray, Laurence (2002). Growing up and Growing old in Ancient Rome. New York, New York: Rutledge. pp. 30–31. ^ a b Boatwright, Mary; Gargola, Daniel; Lenski, Noel; Talbert, Richard (2005). A Brief History of the Romans. New York: Oxford University. pp. 176–177. ^ Richard A. Bauman, Women and Politics in Ancient Rome (Routledge, 1992, 1994), p. 50. ^ Her name appears also as Amesia. ^ Valerius Maximus 8.3.1; Joseph Farrell, Latin Language and Latin Culture (Cambridge University Press, 2001), pp. 74–75; Michael C. Alexander, Trials in the Late Roman Republic, 149–50 BCE (University of Toronto Press, 1990), p. 180. Alexander places the date of the trial, about which Valerius is unclear, to sometime between 80 and 50 BCE. The charge goes unrecorded. ^ Bauman, Women and Politics, p. 50. ^ The name is vexed; it may also be Carfrania. ^ Bauman, Women and Politics, pp. 50–51. ^ Bauman, Women and Politics, p. 51. ^ Bauman, Women and Politics, pp. 51–52. ^ Johnston, Roman Law in Context, chapter 3.3; Frier and McGinn, Casebook, Chapter IV. ^ Yan Thomas, "The Division of the Sexes in Roman Law," in A History of Women from Ancient Goddesses to Christian Saints (Harvard University Press, 1991), p. 134. ^ Alan Watson, The Spirit of Roman Law (University of Georgia Press, 1995), p. 13; Thomas, "The Division of the Sexes," p. 135. ^ Judith Evans Grubbs, Women and the Law in the Roman Empire: A Sourcebook on Marriage, Divorce and Law in the Roman Empire (Routledge, 2002) , p. 24. ^ Watson, The Spirit of Roman Law, p. 13; Gaius, Inst. 1.173. ^ Thomas, "The Division of the Sexes," p. 133. ^ Gaius, Institutes 1.190–1.191. ^ Cinctus vinctusque, according to Festus 55 (edition of Lindsay); Karen K. Hersch, The Roman Wedding: Ritual and Meaning in Antiquity (Cambridge University Press, 2010), pp. 101, 110, 211 . ^ Wiesner, Merry E. “The Family” Gender in History: Global Perspectives, 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2011, p.32 ^ Frier and McGinn, A Casebook on Roman Family Law, p. 20. ^ Duby,Perrot,and Pantel A History of Women Volume 1, pg. 133 ^ The late Imperial Roman jurist Gaius writes of manus marriage as something that used to happen. Frier and McGinn, Casebook, p. 54. ^ Frier and McGinn, Casebook, p. 53. ^ Eva Cantarella, Pandora's Daughters: The Role and Status of Women in Greek and Roman Antiquity (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987), pp. 140–141; J.P. Sullivan, "Martial's Sexual Attitudes", Philologus 123 (1979), p. 296, specifically on sexual freedom. ^ David Johnston, Roman Law in Context (Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp. 33–34. ^ Johnston, Roman Law, pp. 36–36; Frier and McGinn, Casebook, section V. ^ Frier and McGinn, Casebook, pp. 49, 52, citing Ulpian, D. 24.1.3.1. If the donor died first, however, the gift to the surviving spouse was valid. ^ Suzanne Dixon, "From Ceremonial to Sexualities: A Survey of Scholarship on Roman Marriage" in A Companion to Families in the Greek and Roman Worlds (Wiley-Blackwell, 2011), p. 248. ^ Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Antiquitates Romanae, 2.25 ^ Aulus Gellius (Noctes Atticae 4.3.1) places the divorce in 227 BCE, but fudges the date and his sources elsewhere. ^ Alan Watson, The Spirit of Roman Law (University of Georgia Press, 1995), p. 173. ^ Frier and McGinn, Casebook, part D, "The End of Marriage." ^ Susan Treggiari, Roman Marriage: Iusti Coniuges from the Time of Cicero to the Time of Ulpian (Oxford University Press, 1991), pp. 258–259, 500–502 et passim. ^ Karen K. Hersch, The Roman Wedding: Ritual and Meaning in Antiquity, p. 48. ^ In Roman inclusive counting, a pregnancy was counted as lasting ten months. ^ Eva Cantarella, "Marriage and Sexuality in Republican Rome: A Roman Conjugal Love Story," in The Sleep of Reason: Erotic Experience and Sexual Ethics in Ancient Greece and Rome (University of Chicago Press, 2002), p. 276. ^ Plutarch, Roman Questions 105. ^ Karen K. Hersh, The Roman Wedding: Ritual and Meaning in Antiquity (Cambridge University Press, 2010), pp. 4, 48, et passim citing Humbert (1971), pp. 1–11. See also Treggiari, Roman Marriage. ^ Hersh, The Roman Wedding, passim, pointing to the fictionalized and possibly satiric account by Lucan. Or some scholars see in this more of an arrangement than marriage proper. ^ Hersh, The Roman Wedding, pp. 103–104. ^ Frier and McGinn, Casebook, p. 480. ^ Frier and McGinn, Casebook, p. 52. ^ Frier and McGinn, Casebook, p. 50 ^ J.A. Crook Law and Life of Rome 90 B.C.-212 A.D. ^ A casebook on Roman Family Law, Frier and McGinn, pg. 95. ^ Plutarch, Life of Cato the Elder 20.2. ^ Garrett G. Fagan, "Violence in Roman Social Relations," in The Oxford Handbook of Social Relations (Oxford University Press, 2011), p. 487. ^ Tacitus, Annals XVI.6 ^ Frank McLynn, Marcus Aurelius: A Life, p. 435. ^ Rawson, "The Roman Family," p. 30. ^ Plautus, Miles Gloriosus 697. ^ As noted by Soranus (1st century AD) in his Gynaecology 2.18. ^ Jane F. Gardner, Women in Roman Law and Society (Indiana University Press, 1991), p. 242. ^ Lawrence Richardson, "A New Topographical Dictionary of Ancient Rome," (JHU Press, 1992), p. 94. ^ Plutarch, Life of Cato the Elder 20.3; Christopher Michael McDonough, "Carna, Procra and the Strix on the Kalends of June," Transactions of the American Philological Association 127 (1997), p. 322, note 29. ^ Tacitus, Dialogus 28, as noted by McDonough, p. 322. ^ W. Jeffrey Tatum, The Patrician Tribune: Publius Clodius Pulcher (University of North Carolina Press, 1999), p. 33ff. ^ Janine Assa, The Great Roman Ladies (New York, 1960), p. 32; A History of Women in the West from Ancient Goddesses to Christian Saints, vol. 1, p. 115. ^ Jane F. Gardner, Family and Familia in Roman Law and Life (Oxford University Press, 1999, 2004), p. 53. ^ Plutarch, Life of Cato the Elder 20.2. ^ Assa, The Great Roman Ladies, p. 50. ^ Susan Treggiari, Roman Marriage: Iusti Coniuges from the Time of Cicero to the Time of Ulpian (Oxford University Press, 1991, reprinted 2002), p. 420. ^ Hermann Fränkel, Ovid: A Poet between Two Worlds (University of California Press, 1956), p. 151. ^ Jo-Marie Claasen, "Tristia," in A Companion to Ovid (Blackwell, 2009), p. 179. ^ Assa, The Great Roman Ladies, p. 45. ^ Assa, The Great Roman Ladies, p. 51. ^ Gaston Boissier, Cicero and his friends: a study of Roman Society in the time of Caesar, Questia edition. ^ A Casebook on Roman Family Law Frier+McGinn pg 461 ^ Law and Life of Rome, J.A. Crook pg.172 ^ Christians and Pagans, Fox, Pg. 464 ^ The Gracchi Marius and Sulla, A.H. Beesley, pg. 21 on the first Serville War ^ See Ancient Roman Life as Illustrated by Latin Inscriptions by Brian K. Harvey. ^ Abbott, Society and Politics in Ancient Rome: Essays and Sketches, pg. 98 ^ Women's life in Greece & Rome, Lefkowitz+Fant, pg. 171 ^ Paul, Opinions 2.26.11 L, as cited in Women's Life in Greece and Rome: A Source Book in Translation, edited by Mary R. Lefkowitz and Maureen B. Fant (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1982, 3rd ed. 2005), p. 104. ^ "Women and Marriage in Ancient Rome," Chapter 1; Jane Bingham,The Usborne Internet-Linked Encyclopedia of The Roman World (Usborne, 2002), page 48. ^ Catharine Edwards, "Unspeakable Professions: Public Performance and Prostitution in Ancient Rome," in Roman Sexualities (Princeton University Press, 1997), pp. 66ff. ^ Celia E. Schultz, Women's Religious Activity in the Roman Republic (University of North Carolina Press, 2006), p. 54. ^ Rawson, Children and Childhood in Roman Italy, p. 80. ^ Pliny the Elder, Natural History, 35.147. ^ Hallet, Judith (1984). Fathers and Daughters in Roman Society. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University. pp. 8, 10. ^ Arthur Ernest Gordon, Illustrated Introduction to Latin Epigraphy (University of California Press, 1983), pp. 34, 103. ^ Richard Saller, "Status and patronage", Cambridge Ancient History: The High Empire, A.D. 70–192 (Cambridge University Press, 2000), p. 18. ^ Tacitus, Annals 15.51 ^ Tacitus, Annals 15.71. ^ Allison P. (2011) 'Soldiers’ families in the early Roman Empire', in B. Rawson, ed., Family and household in ancient Greece and Rome: a companion, 161–182. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell ^ Greene, E.M. (2014). “If the shoe fits: Style and function of children’s shoes from Vindolanda” in R. Collins and F. McIntosh (eds.), Life in the Limes: Studies of the People and Objects of the Roman Frontiers. Oxford: Oxbow. 29–36. ^ Greene, E.M. (2015) 'Girls or Boys on the Column of Trajan? Depictions of Female Participation in Military Religion' presented at 116th Joint Annual Meeting of the Archaeological Institute of America and the Society for Classical Studies (formerly the American Philological Association), January 8–11, 2015. ^ Mary Beard, J.A. North, and S.R.F. Price, Religions of Rome: A History (Cambridge University Press, 1998), vol. 1, p. 297. ^ Celia E. Schultz, Women's Religious Activity in the Roman Republic (University of North Carolina Press, 2006), pp. 134–136. In some sense, every head of household was a priest responsible for religious maintenance at home; in Roman patriarchal society, this was the paterfamilias. Public religion, like society and politics in general, reflected the hierarchy of the household, since the familia was the building block of society. See John Scheid, An Introduction to Roman Religion (Indiana University Press, 2003), p. 129ff. ^ Beard et al., Religions of Rome, vol. 1, pp. 296–297. ^ Phyllis Culham, "Women in the Roman Republic," in The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Republic (Cambridge University Press, 2004), p. 143. ^ Barbette Stanley Spaeth, The Roman Goddess Ceres (University of Texas Press, 1996), p. 104. ^ Lesley E. Lundeen, "In Search of the Etruscan Priestess: A Re-Examination of the hatrencu," in Religion in Republican Italy (Cambridge University Press, 2006), p. 46; Schultz, Women's Religious Activity in the Roman Republic, pp. 70–71. ^ Ariadne Staples, From Good Goddess to Vestal Virgins: Sex and Category in Roman Religion (Routledge, 1998), p. 184. ^ Gary Forsythe, A Critical History of Early Rome: From Prehistory to the First Punic War (University of California Press, 2005, 2006), p. 141. ^ Staples, From Good Goddess to Vestal Virgins, pp. 154–155. ^ Macrobius, Saturnalia 1.16. ^ Emily A. Hemelrijk, "Women and Sacrifice in the Roman Empire," in Ritual Dynamics and Religious Change in the Roman Empire. Proceedings of the Eighth Workshop of the International Network Impact of Empire (Heidelberg, July 5–7, 2007) (Brill, 2009), pp. 258–259, citing Macrobius, Saturnalia 1.15.19. ^ Jörg Rüpke, Fasti sacerdotum: A Prosopography of Pagan, Jewish, and Christian Religious Officials in the City of Rome, 300 BCE to CE 499 (Oxford University Press, 2008, originally published in German 2005), pp. 223, 783, 840. ^ Forsythe, A Critical History of Early Rome, p. 136, based on Festus on the ordo sacerdotum (hierarchy of priests), 198 in the edition of Lindsay. ^ Schultz, Women's Religious Activity in the Roman Republic, pp. 79–81. ^ Michael Lipka, Roman Gods: A Conceptual Approach (Brill, 2009), pp. 141–142 online. ^ Varro, De re rustica 1.1.4, says their golden images stood in the forum, "six male and the same number of female." ^ The Capitoline Triad replaced the Indo-European Archaic Triad, composed of three male gods, and is thought to result from Etruscan influence; see Robert Schilling, Roman and European Mythologies (University of Chicago Press, 1992, from the French edition of 1981), pp. 73, 87, 131, 150. ^ Stephen L. Dyson, Rome: A Living Portrait of an Ancient City (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010), p. 283. ^ M. Golden, "Did the Ancients Care When Their Children Died?" Greece & Rome 35 (1988) 152–163. ^ Beard et al., Religions of Rome, vol. 1, p. 297. ^ Cicero, De legibus 2.9.21; Emily A. Hemelrijk, "Women and Sacrifice in the Roman Empire," in Ritual Dynamics and Religious Change in the Roman Empire. Proceedings of the Eighth Workshop of the International Network Impact of Empire (Heidelberg, July 5–7, 2007) (Brill, 2009), p. 255. ^ Assa, The Great Roman Ladies, p. 73. ^ Garrett G. Fagan, Bathing in Public in the Roman World (University of Michigan Press, 1999, 2002), pp. 26–27. ^ Assa, The Great Roman Ladies, p. 92. ^ Livius, Titus, A History of Rome, (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Pub, 2006), 182. ^ Assa, 102. ^ Assa, 96. ^ Assa, 65. ^ Assa, 60. ^ Assa, 65 ^ Assa, 66. ^ Christopher A. Faraone; Laura K. McClure (14 March 2008). Prostitutes and Courtesans in the Ancient World. Univ of Wisconsin Press. pp. 6–. ISBN 978-0-299-21313-8. Retrieved 3 April 2013. ^ Assa, 67. ^ Pomeroy, Sarah Jane, Women in Classical Antiquity ^ Pliny the Younger, Letters, Book 1 letter IV ^ Kelly Olson, "The Appearance of the Young Roman Girl," in Roman Dress and the Fabrics of Roman Culture (University of Toronto Press, 2008), p. 143. ^ John R. Clarke, Looking at Lovemaking: Constructions of Sexuality in Roman Art 100 B.C.–A.D. 250 (University of California Press, 1998, 2001), p. 34. ^ Amy Richlin, The Garden of Priapus: Sexuality and Aggression in Roman Humor (Oxford University Press, 1983, 1992), pp. 68, 110. ^ Clarke, Looking at Lovemaking, p. 34 et passim. ^ Martial, Epigrams 1.100, 2.52, 14.66; Richlin, The Garden of Priapus, pp. 52, 54, 68. ^ Olson, "The Appearance of the Young Roman Girl," p. 143. ^ Pliny the Elder, Natural History 25.95, citing Anaxilaus, a Pythagorean physician in the time of Augustus; Matthew W. Dickie, Magic and Magicians in the Greco-Roman World (Routledge, 2001, 2005), p. 167. Pliny also notes that an application of hemlock was used to suppress lactation. ^ Richlin, The Garden of Priapus, p. 38. ^ Larissa Bonfante, "Nursing Mothers in Classical Art," in Naked Truths: Women, Sexuality, and Gender in Classical Art and Archaeology (Routledge, 1997, 2000), pp. 174ff. ^ Anthony Corbeill, Nature Embodied: Gesture in Ancient Rome (Princeton University Press, 2004), p. 87ff.; Alan Cameron, The Last Pagans of Rome (Oxford University Press, 2011), p. 725; Mary Lefkowitz and Maureen B. Fant, Women's Life in Greece and Rome, p. 350, note 5. ^ Citation needed ^ Juvenal, Satire VI lines 6.286–313 ^ Ann Ellis Hanson, "The Restructuring of Female Physiology at Rome," in Les écoles médicales à Rome (Université de Nantes, 1991), p. 259. ^ Hanson, "The Restructuring of Female Physiology," p. 259–260; Marilyn B. Skinner, introduction to Roman Sexualities (Princeton University Press, 1997), p. 11: The "notion of women as 'Same' as well as 'Other' presupposed a female body partly assimilated to the male constitution, one whose sex-specific functions, such as lactation or even pregnancy, did not constitute its entire raison d'être." ^ Hanson, "The Restructuring of Female Physiology," pp. 259–260. ^ Hanson, "The Restructuring of Female Physiology," p. 260. The Gynecology of Soranus is central to Hanson's arguments. ^ Hanson, "The Restructuring of Female Physiology," p. 264. ^ Hanson, "The Restructuring of Female Physiology," p. 265. ^ Hanson, "The Restructuring of Female Physiology," p. 267, citing Priapea 78 on the vitiating effects of uncontrolled sexual activity and releasing too much semen, and CIL 12.6721(5), one of the Perusine glandes. The outsized phallus of Roman art was associated with the god Priapus, among others. It was laughter-provoking, grotesque, or used for magical purposes; see David Fredrick, The Roman Gaze: Vision, Power, and the Body (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2002), p. 156. Nude statues of men that were intended to be beautiful or dignified had a small penis. ^ Hanson, "The Restructuring of Female Physiology," p. 267. Clitoridectomy is described in some detail by the Byzantine physicians and medical writers Aëtius of Amida (fl. mid-5th century/mid-6th century) and Paul of Aegina, as well as the North African gynecological writer Muscio (ca. 500 CE); see Holt N. Parker, "The Teratogenic Grid," in Roman Sexualities (Princeton University Press, 1997), p. 59. ^ J.A. Crook, Law and Life of Rome 90 B.C.-A.D. 212 (Cornell University Press, 1967, 1984), pp. 48–50. ^ Crook, Law and Life of Rome, p. 101. ^ The Economy of Prostitution in the Roman World: A Study of social History and the Brothel By Thomas A. McGinn. pg. 52 ^ Thomas AJ McGinn, Prostitution, Sexuality and the Law in Ancient Rome, Oxford University Press. 1998, p. 56. ^ Thomas AJ McGinn, Prostitution, Sexuality and the Law in Ancient Rome, Oxford University Press, 1998, p. 293 ^ Tacitus, Annals 15.37 ^ Thomas AJ McGinn, Prostitution, Sexuality and the Law in Ancient Rome, Oxford University Press, 1998, pp. 171, 310. Bibliography[edit] Assa, Janine (1960). The Great Roman Ladies. New York: Grove Press. Daehner, Jens (ed.), The Herculaneum Women: History, Context, Identities (Los Angeles: The J. Paul Getty Museum, 2007), Pp. xiv, 178. Freisenbruch, Annelise (2010). The First Ladies of Rome: the Women behind the Caesars. London: Jonathan Cape. Bruce W. Frier, Thomas A. J. McGinn (2004). A casebook on Roman family law. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-516186-6. Gardner, Jane F. 1986. Women in Roman Law and Society. Croom Helm Hallett, Judith P. (1984). Fathers and daughters in Roman society: women and the elite family. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-03570-9. Spaeth, Barbette Stanley. The Roman goddess Ceres, University of Texas Press, 1996. Further reading[edit] (in French) Gérard Minaud, Les vies de 12 femmes d’empereur romain - Devoirs, Intrigues & Voluptés , Paris, L’Harmattan, 2012. External links[edit] Wikimedia Commons has media related to Women of Rome. Wikimedia Commons has media related to Ancient Roman women. Dr. Susan Martin, Private Lives and Public Personae, 1997. WomenintheAncientWorld.com (2005). Moya K. Mason, Ancient Roman Women: A Look at their Lives. Essay on the lives of Roman women. "Wife-beating in Ancient Rome": an article by Joy Connolly in the TLS, April 9, 2008 "An etext version of: Ferrero, Guglielmo. "Women and Marriage in Ancient Rome." The Women of the Caesars. The Century Co.; New York, 1911. This edition was created by Jone Johnson Lewis, 2003." v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Women_in_ancient_Rome&oldid=995744570" Categories: Women in ancient Rome Women by culture Women by former country Hidden categories: Articles with French-language sources (fr) Commons category link is locally defined Commons category link is on Wikidata Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Languages العربية Català Deutsch Español Euskara Français Galego Hrvatski Bahasa Indonesia Italiano Nederlands Português Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Svenska Українська Tiếng Việt Edit links This page was last edited on 22 December 2020, at 17:39 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-159 ---- Edward FitzGerald (poet) - Wikipedia Edward FitzGerald (poet) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Edward FitzGerald Edward FitzGerald by Eva Rivett-Carnac (after a photograph of 1873) Born (1809-03-31)31 March 1809 Bredfield House, Bredfield, Woodbridge, Suffolk, England, UK Died 14 June 1883(1883-06-14) (aged 74) Merton, Norfolk, England, UK Occupation Poet, writer Notable works English translation of The Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam Signature Edward FitzGerald or Fitzgerald[1] (31 March 1809 – 14 June 1883) was an English poet and writer. His most famous poem is the first and best known English translation of The Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam, which has kept its reputation and popularity since the 1860s. Contents 1 Life 2 Early literary work 3 Personal life 4 The Rubáiyát 4.1 Parodies 5 See also 6 Notes 7 Bibliography, biographies 8 Further reading 9 External links Life[edit] Edward FitzGerald was born Edward Purcell at Bredfield House in Bredfield, some 2 miles north of Woodbridge, Suffolk, England, in 1809. In 1818, his father, John Purcell, assumed the name and arms of his wife's family, the FitzGeralds.[2] His elder brother John used the surname Purcell-Fitzgerald from 1858.[3] The change of family name occurred shortly after FitzGerald's mother inherited her second fortune. She had previously inherited over half a million pounds from an aunt, but in 1818, her father died and left her considerably more than that. The FitzGeralds were one of the wealthiest families in England. Edward FitzGerald later commented that all of his relatives were mad; further, that he was insane as well, but was at least aware of the fact.[4] In 1816, the family moved to France, and lived in St Germain as well as Paris, but in 1818, after the death of his maternal grandfather, the family had to return to England. In 1821, Edward was sent to King Edward VI School, Bury St Edmunds. In 1826, he went on to Trinity College, Cambridge.[5] He became acquainted with William Makepeace Thackeray and William Hepworth Thompson.[2] Though he had many friends who were members of the Cambridge Apostles, most notably Alfred Tennyson, FitzGerald himself was never offered an invitation to this famous group.[citation needed] In 1830, FitzGerald left for Paris, but in 1831 was living in a farmhouse on the battlefield of Naseby.[2] Needing no employment, FitzGerald moved to his native Suffolk, where he lived quietly, never leaving the county for more than a week or two while he resided there. Until 1835, the FitzGeralds lived in Wherstead, then moved until 1853 to a cottage in the grounds of Boulge Hall, near Woodbridge, to which his parents had moved. In 1860, he again moved with his family to Farlingay Hall, where they stayed until in 1873. Their final move was to Woodbridge itself, where FitzGerald resided at his own house close by, called Little Grange. During most of this time, FitzGerald was preoccupied with flowers, music and literature. Friends like Tennyson and Thackeray had surpassed him in the field of literature, and for a long time FitzGerald showed no intention of emulating their literary success. In 1851, he published his first book, Euphranor, a Platonic dialogue, born of memories of the old happy life in Cambridge. This was followed in 1852 by the publication of Polonius, a collection of "saws and modern instances," some of them his own, the rest borrowed from the less familiar English classics. FitzGerald began the study of Spanish poetry in 1850 at Elmsett, followed by Persian literature at the University of Oxford with Professor Edward Byles Cowell in 1853.[2] FitzGerald married Lucy, daughter of the Quaker poet Bernard Barton, in Chichester on 4 November 1856, after a death-bed promise to Bernard made in 1849 to look after her. The marriage was unhappy and the couple separated after only a few months,[6] despite having known each other for many years, including collaborating on a book about her father's works in 1849. Early literary work[edit] In 1853, FitzGerald issued Six Dramas of Calderon, freely translated.[6] He then turned to Oriental studies, and in 1856 published anonymously a version of the Salámán and Absál of Jami in Miltonic verse. In March 1857, Cowell discovered a set of Persian quatrains by Omar Khayyám in the Asiatic Society library, Calcutta, and sent them to FitzGerald. At the time, the name with which FitzGerald has been so closely identified first occurs in his correspondence: "Hafiz and Omar Khayyam ring like true metal." On 15 January 1859, an anonymous pamphlet appeared as The Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam. In the world at large and the circle of FitzGerald's close friends, the poem seems at first to have attracted no attention. The publisher allowed it to gravitate to a fourpenny or even (as he afterwards boasted) to a penny box on the bookstalls.[2] Grave of Edward FitzGerald in Boulge churchyard[7] However, it was discovered in 1861 by Rossetti and soon after by Swinburne and Lord Houghton. The Rubaiyat slowly became famous, but it was not until 1868 that FitzGerald was encouraged to print a second, greatly revised edition of it. He had produced in 1865 a version of the Agamemnon, and two more plays from Calderón. In 1880–1881, he privately issued translations of the two Oedipus tragedies. His last publication was Readings in Crabbe, 1882. He left in manuscript a version of Attar of Nishapur's Mantic-Uttair.[2] This last translation FitzGerald called "A Bird's-Eye view of the Bird Parliament", whittling the Persian original (some 4500 lines) down to a more manageable 1500 lines in English. Some have called this translation a virtually unknown masterpiece.[8] From 1861 onwards, FitzGerald's greatest interest had been in the sea. In June 1863 he bought a yacht, "The Scandal", and in 1867 he became part-owner of a herring lugger, the Meum and Tuum ("mine and thine"). For some years up to 1871, he spent his summers "knocking about somewhere outside of Lowestoft." He died in his sleep in 1883 and was buried in the graveyard at St Michael's Church in Boulge, Suffolk. He was in his own words "an idle fellow, but one whose friendships were more like loves." In 1885 his fame was enhanced by Tennyson's dedication of his Tiresias to FitzGerald's memory, in some reminiscent verses to "Old Fitz."[2] Personal life[edit] Little was known of FitzGerald personally until his close friend and literary executor W. Aldis Wright, published his three-volume Letters and Literary Remains in 1889 and the Letters to Fanny Kemble in 1895. These letters reveal that FitzGerald was a witty, picturesque, and sympathetic letter writer.[9] The late 19th-century English novelist George Gissing found them interesting enough to read the three-volume collection twice, in 1890 and 1896. This included some of Fitzgerald's letters to Fanny Kemble. Gissing also read the 1895 volume of letters in December of that year.[10] FitzGerald was unobtrusive personally, but in the 1890s, his distinctive individuality gradually gained a broad influence over English belles-lettres.[11] FitzGerald's emotional life was complex. He was extremely close to many friends, among them William Browne, who was 16 when they met. Browne's tragically early death in a horse-riding accident was a catastrophe for FitzGerald. Later, FitzGerald became close to a fisherman named Joseph Fletcher, with whom he had bought a herring boat.[6] While it appears there are no contemporary sources on the matter, a number of present-day academics and journalists believe FitzGerald to have been a homosexual.[12] With Professor Daniel Karlin writing in his introduction to the 2009 edition of Rubáiyát of Omar Khayyám that "His [FitzGerald] homoerotic feelings (...) were probably unclear to him, at least in the form conveyed by our word 'gay'",[13] it is unclear whether FitzGerald himself ever identified himself as a homosexual or acknowledged himself to be one. FitzGerald grew disenchanted with Christianity and eventually ceased to attend church.[14] This drew the attention of the local pastor, who stopped by. FitzGerald reportedly told him that his decision to absent himself was the fruit of long and hard meditation. When the pastor protested, FitzGerald showed him the door and said, "Sir, you might have conceived that a man does not come to my years of life without thinking much of these things. I believe I may say that I have reflected [on] them fully as much as yourself. You need not repeat this visit."[14] The 1908 book Edward Fitzgerald and "Posh": Herring Merchants (Including letters from E. Fitzgerald to J. Fletcher) recounts the friendship of Fitzgerald with Joseph Fletcher (born June 1838), nicknamed "Posh", who was still living when James Blyth started researching for the book.[15] Posh is also often present in Fitzgerald's letters. Documentary data about the Fitzgerald–Posh partnership are available at the Port of Lowestoft Research Society. Posh died at Mutford Union workhouse, near Lowestoft, on 7 September 1915, at the age of 76.[16] Fitzgerald was termed "almost vegetarian", as he ate meat only in other people's houses.[17] His biographer Thomas Wright noted that "though never a strict vegetarian, his diet was mainly bread and fruit."[18] Several years before his death, FitzGerald said of his diet, "Tea, pure and simple, with bread-and-butter, is the only meal I do care to join in."[19] The Rubáiyát[edit] Beginning in 1859, FitzGerald authorized four editions (1859, 1868, 1872 and 1879) and there was a fifth posthumous edition (1889) of his translation of the Rubáiyát of Omar Khayyám (Persian: رباعیات عمر خیام‎). Three (the first, second, and fifth) differ significantly; the second and third are almost identical, as are the fourth and fifth. The first and fifth are reprinted almost equally often,[20][21] and equally often anthologized.[22] A Book of Verses underneath the Bough, A Jug of Wine, a Loaf of Bread – and Thou Beside me singing in the Wilderness – Oh, Wilderness were Paradise enow! Title page from the first American edition of FitzGerald's translation, 1878 Stanza XI above, from the fifth edition, differs from the corresponding stanza in the first edition, wherein it reads: "Here with a Loaf of Bread beneath the bough/A Flask of Wine, a Book of Verse – and Thou". Other differences are discernible. Stanza XLIX is more well known in its incarnation in the first edition (1859): 'Tis all a Chequer-board of Nights and Days Where Destiny with Men for Pieces plays: Hither and thither moves, and mates, and slays, And one by one back in the Closet lays. The fifth edition (1889) of stanza LXIX, with different numbering, is less familiar: "But helpless Pieces of the Game He plays/Upon this Chequer-board of Nights and Days;/Hither and thither moves, and checks, and slays,/And one by one back in the Closet lays." FitzGerald's translation of the Rubáiyát is notable for being a work to which allusions are both frequent and ubiquitous.[11] It remains popular, but enjoyed its greatest popularity for a century following its publication, wherein it formed part of the wider English literary canon.[11] One indicator of the popular status of the Rubáiyát is that, of the 101 stanzas in the poem's fifth edition, the Oxford Dictionary of Quotations (2nd edition) quotes no less than 43 entire stanzas in full, in addition to many individual lines and couplets. Stanza LI, also well-known, runs: The Moving Finger writes; and, having writ, Moves on; nor all your Piety nor Wit Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line, Nor all your Tears wash out a Word of it. Lines and phrases from the poem have been used as the titles of many literary works, among them Nevil Shute's The Chequer Board, James Michener's The Fires of Spring and Agatha Christie's The Moving Finger. Eugene O'Neill's Ah, Wilderness alludes to the Rubáiyát without making a direct quotation. Allusions are frequent in the short stories of O. Henry.[23] Saki's pseudonym makes reference to it. The popular 1925 song A Cup of Coffee, A Sandwich, and You, by Billy Rose and Al Dubin, echoes the first of the stanzas quoted above. Parodies[edit] FitzGerald's translations were popular in the century of their publication, also with humorists for the purpose of parody.[11] The Rubáiyát of Ohow Dryyam by J. L. Duff utilises the original to create a satire commenting on Prohibition. Rubaiyat of a Persian Kitten by Oliver Herford, published in 1904, is the illustrated story of a kitten in parody of the original verses. The Rubaiyat of Omar Cayenne by Gelett Burgess (1866–1951) was a condemnation of the writing and publishing business. The Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam, Jr. (1971) by Wallace Irwin purports to be a translation from "Mango-Bornese" chronicling the adventures of Omar Khayyam's son "Omar Junior" – unmentioned in the original – who has emigrated from Persia to Borneo. Astrophysicist Arthur Eddington wrote a parody about his famous 1919 experiment to test Albert Einstein's general theory of relativity by observing a solar eclipse. The new Rubaiyat: Omar Khayyam reincarnated by "Ame Perdue" (pen name of W.J. Carroll) was published in Melbourne in 1943. It revisits the plaints of the original text with references to modern science, technology and industry. See also[edit] Translation § History Notes[edit] ^ His name is seen written as both FitzGerald and Fitzgerald. The use here of FitzGerald conforms to that of his own publications, anthologies such as Quiller-Couch's Oxford Book of English Verse, and most reference books until about the 1960s. ^ a b c d e f g  One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Gosse, Edmund (1911). "Edward FitzGerald". In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. 10 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 443. ^ "Fitzgerald (formerly Purcell), John (FTST820J)". A Cambridge Alumni Database. University of Cambridge. ^ Caufield, Catherine (1981). The Emperor of the United States and other magnificent British eccentrics. Routledge and Kegan Paul. p. 86. ISBN 0-7100-0957-7. ^ "Edward Fitzgerald (FTST826E)". A Cambridge Alumni Database. University of Cambridge. ^ a b c "Edward Fitzgerald", Poem Hunter ^ Historic England. "Details from listed building database (1284168)". National Heritage List for England. ^ Briggs, A. D. P. (1998). The Rubaiyat and the Bird Parliament. Everyman's Poetry. ^ Joseph Sendry (1984) "Edward FitzGerald", in William E. Fredeman and Ira B. Nadel, eds (1984) Dictionary of Literary Biography, Volume 32: Victorian Poets Before 1850 Gale Research Company, Detroit, Michigan, pp. 121–122, ISBN 0-8103-1710-9 ^ Pierre Coustillas, ed., London and the Life of Literature in Late Victorian England: the Diary of George Gissing, Novelist. Brighton: Harvester Press, 1978, pp. 232, 396, 413 and 415. ^ a b c d Staff (10 April 1909) "Two Centenaries" New York Times: Saturday Review of Books p. BR-220 ^ "From Persia to Tyneside and the door of darkness". The Independent. 5 November 1995. Retrieved 7 July 2020. ^ Omar Khayyam (2009). Rubáiyát of Omar Khayyám. FitzGerald, Edward, 1809-1883, Karlin, Daniel, 1953-. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 6. ISBN 978-0-19-156230-3. OCLC 320958676. ^ a b Plomer, William (1978). Electric Delights. David R. Godine. p. 89. ISBN 0-87923-248-X. ^ Blyth, James (1908). Edward Fitzgerald and 'Posh', 'herring merchants' Including letters from E. Fitzgerald to J. Fletcher. ^ Fitzgerald, Edward (2014). The Letters of Edward Fitzgerald, Volume 3: 1867–1876. Princeton University Press. p. 194. ISBN 9781400854011. ^ "An Old Man in a Dry Month": a Brief Life of Edward FitzGerald (1809–1883)". The Victorian Web. ^ Thomas Wright, The Life of Edward Fitzgerald. New York, 1904, p. 116. ^ John Glyde, 1900 The Life of Edward Fitz-Gerald, by John Glyde. Chicago. p. 44. ^ Christopher Decker, ed., "Introduction: Postscript" Edward FitzGerald, Rubáiyát of Omar Khayyám: a critical edition University Press of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, page xlv, 1997. ISBN 0-8139-1689-5 ^ Stanley Appelbaum, (editor) (1990) "Note" Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam Dover Publications, Mineola, New York, back cover, ISBN 0-486-26467-X ^ Frederick A. Manchester and William F. Giese, eds, Harper's anthology for college courses in composition and literature Harper & Brothers, New York, vol. 2, 1926, p. 685, OCLC 1743706 Worldcat.org. ^ Victoria Blake, ed., "Notes" Selected Stories of O. Henry Barnes & Noble Books, New York, pp. 404 and 418, 1993. ISBN 1-59308-042-5 Bibliography, biographies[edit] The Works of Edward FitzGerald appeared in 1887. See also a chronological list of FitzGerald's works (Caxton Club, Chicago, 1899). Notes for a bibliography by Col. W. F. Prideaux, in Notes and Queries (9th series, vol. VL), published separately in 1901 Letters and Literary Remains, ed. W. Aldis Wright, 1902–1903 'Letters to Fanny Kemble', ed. William Aldis Wright Life of Edward FitzGerald, by Thomas Wright (1904) contains a bibliography, vol. ii. pp. 241–243, and a list of sources, vol. i. pp. xvi–xvii The volume on FitzGerald in the "English Men of Letters" series is by A. C. Benson. The FitzGerald centenary was marked in March 1909. See the Centenary Celebrations Souvenir (Ipswich, 1909) and The Times for 25 March 1909. Today, the major source is Robert Bernard Martin's biography, With Friends Possessed: A Life of Edward Fitzgerald. A comprehensive four-volume collection of The Letters of Edward FitzGerald, edited by Syracuse University English professor Alfred M. Terhune, was published in 1980. Further reading[edit] William Axon, "Omar" Fitzgerald. Good Health 46 (1), 1911, pp. 107–113 Harold Bloom, Modern Critical Interpretations Philadelphia, 2004 Jorge Borges, "The Enigma of Edward FitzGerald," Selected Non-Fictions, Penguin, 1999. ISBN 0-14-029011-7 Robert Douglas-Fairhurst, Victorian Afterlives: The Shaping of Influence in Nineteenth-Century Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002 Garnett, Richard; Gosse, Edmund (1904). English Literature. 4. New York: Grosset & Dunlap. Francis Hindes Groome; Edward FitzGerald (1902). Edward FitzGerald. Portland, Maine: Thomas B. Mosher. Edward FitzGerald Gary Sloan, Great Minds, "The Rubáiyát of Edward FitzOmar", Free Inquiry, Winter 2002/2003 – Volume 23, No. 1 External links[edit] Wikimedia Commons has media related to Edward FitzGerald (poet). Wikisource has original works written by or about: Edward FitzGerald Wikisource has the text of the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica article FitzGerald, Edward. Wikiquote has quotations related to: Edward FitzGerald (poet) Works by Edward FitzGerald at Project Gutenberg Works by Edward Fitzgerald (translator) at Faded Page (Canada) Works by or about Edward FitzGerald at Internet Archive Works by Edward FitzGerald at LibriVox (public domain audiobooks) Encyclopedia Iranica, "Fitzgerald Edward" by Dick Davis Bird Parliament by Edward FitzGerald Parodies of the Rubaiyat – several parodies of the Rubaiyat are included, with artwork and comparisons to the Fitzgerald translation. Rubáiyát of Omar Khayyam. Rendered into English verse by Edward Fitzgerald. Complete edition showing variants in the five original printings. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell, 1921 Edward FitzGerald Collection. General Collection, Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library. v t e The Barton/Hack family tree This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (April 2015) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) Mary Done (1752–1784) John Barton (1755–1789) Elizabeth Horne (1760–1833) Lucy Jesup (1781–1808) Bernard Barton (1784–1849) Maria Hack (1777–1844) Stephen Hack (1775–1823) John Barton (1789–1852) Edward FitzGerald (1809–1883) Lucy Barton (1808–1898) Bridget Watson (1806–1881) John Barton Hack (1805–1884) Stephen Hack Elizabeth Marsh Wilton (1815-1915) Thomas Sandon Hack (1811–1865) Theodore Hack (1840–1902) Wilton Hack (1843–1923) Notes References: "Thomas Sandon Hack: architect of Southampton, 1841-49" (PDF). southampton.gov.uk. "Edward FitzGerald (poet)". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/9548. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.) "Bernard Barton". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/1595. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.) "Maria Hack". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/11834. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.) "John Barton (economist)". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/37160. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.) Family tree of the Barton/Hack family Authority control BNF: cb11930306c (data) CANTIC: a10817268 CiNii: DA01048181 GND: 118910361 ISNI: 0000 0001 2134 8194 LCCN: n80126218 MBA: 8cf0cc9f-c6d6-4948-b91c-c351902f46b8 NDL: 00439642 NGV: 14792 NKC: jo2012689001 NLA: 35087344 NLI: 000606180 NLK: KAC199608859 NLP: A19501377 NSK: 000170946 NTA: 068374895 RKD: 28185 SELIBR: 186969 SNAC: w62v2gmp SUDOC: 027211622 Trove: 157556 ULAN: 500004336 VcBA: 495/255770 VIAF: 59091022 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n80126218 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Edward_FitzGerald_(poet)&oldid=981426513" Categories: 1809 births 1883 deaths 19th-century translators Alumni of Trinity College, Cambridge English agnostics English expatriates in France English male poets People from Woodbridge, Suffolk Persian–English translators Translators of Omar Khayyám Hidden categories: Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica with Wikisource reference Wikipedia articles incorporating text from the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica Use dmy dates from August 2020 All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from August 2019 Articles containing Persian-language text Commons category link is on Wikidata Articles with Project Gutenberg links Articles with Internet Archive links Articles with LibriVox links Articles needing additional references from April 2015 All articles needing additional references Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the ODNB Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CANTIC identifiers Wikipedia articles with CINII identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with MusicBrainz identifiers Wikipedia articles with NDL identifiers Wikipedia articles with NGV identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLI identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLP identifiers Wikipedia articles with NSK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with RKDartists identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SNAC-ID identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with Trove identifiers Wikipedia articles with ULAN identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikiquote Wikisource Languages العربية تۆرکجه Bosanski Brezhoneg Català Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Español فارسی Français 한국어 Հայերեն Bahasa Indonesia Interlingua Italiano مصرى Nederlands ਪੰਜਾਬੀ Polski Português Русский සිංහල Svenska Tagalog Taqbaylit Türkçe Українська Tiếng Việt Edit links This page was last edited on 2 October 2020, at 07:29 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1593 ---- Empire - Wikipedia Empire From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Multiple states under one central authority This article is about the political and historical term. For other uses, see Empire (disambiguation). The Roman Empire at its greatest extent in 117 AD, the time of Trajan's death (with its vassals in pink) Part of the Politics series Basic forms of government Power source Democracy (rule by many) Demarchy Direct Liberal Representative Social Socialist Others Oligarchy (rule by few) Anocracy Aristocracy Ergatocracy Gerontocracy Kleptocracy Kritarchy Noocracy Particracy Plutocracy Stratocracy Technocracy Autocracy (rule by one) Despotism Dictatorship Military dictatorship Tyranny Anarchism (rule by none) Anarchy Free association Stateless Power ideology Monarchy vs. republic (socio-political ideologies) Absolute Constitutional Confucianist Directorial Legalist Parliamentary Presidential Semi-presidential Socialist Authoritarian vs. libertarian (socio-economic ideologies) Anarchism Colonialism Communism Despotism Distributism Feudalism Socialism Totalitarianism Tribalism Global vs. local (geo-cultural ideologies) Commune City-state Intergovernmental organisation National government World government Nationalism Internationalism Globalism Power structure Unitary Unitary state Empire Principality Client state Associated state Dependent territory Dominion Protectorate Puppet state Puppet monarch Satellite state Self-governing colony Tributary state Vassal state Federalism Confederation Devolution Federation Superstate Supranational union International relations Small power Regional power Middle power Great power Superpower Politics portal v t e An empire is a sovereign state consisting of several territories and peoples subject to a single ruling authority, often an emperor. States can be empires either by narrow definition through having an emperor and being named as such, or by broad definition as stated above in being an aggregated realm under the rule of a supreme authority. An empire can be made solely of contiguous territories, such as the Austro-Hungarian Empire or the Russian Empire, or include territories which are far remote from the 'home' country of the empire, such as a colonial empire. Aside from the more formal usage, the word empire can also refer colloquially to a large-scale business enterprise (e.g. a transnational corporation), a political organisation controlled by a single individual (a political boss), or a group (political bosses).[1] The concept of empire is associated with other such concepts as imperialism, colonialism, and globalization, with imperialism referring to the creation and maintenance of unequal relationships between nations and not necessarily the policy of a state headed by an emperor or empress. Empire is often used as a term to describe displeasure to overpowering situations.[2] There are two main ways to establish and maintain an imperial political structure: (i) as a territorial empire of direct conquest and control with force or (ii) as a coercive, hegemonic empire of indirect conquest and control with power. The former method provides greater tribute and direct political control, yet limits further expansion because it absorbs military forces to fixed garrisons. The latter method provides less tribute and indirect control, but avails military forces for further expansion.[3] Territorial empires (e.g. the Mongol Empire and Median Empire) tend to be contiguous areas. The term, on occasion, has been applied to maritime republics or thalassocracies (e.g. the Athenian and British empires) with looser structures and more scattered territories, often consisting of many islands and other forms of possessions which required the creation and maintenance of a powerful navy. Empires such the Holy Roman Empire also came together by electing the emperor with votes from member realms through the Imperial election. Contents 1 Definition 2 Characteristics 3 History of imperialism 3.1 Bronze and Iron Age empires 3.2 Classical period 3.3 Post-classical period 3.4 Colonial empires 3.5 Modern period 3.6 Transition from empire 4 Fall of empires 4.1 Roman Empire 5 Contemporary usage 6 Timeline of empires 7 Theoretical research 7.1 The Seven Stages of Empire 7.2 Empire versus nation state 7.3 Universal empire 7.4 Circumscription theory 7.5 Present 7.6 Future 8 See also 9 References 10 Further reading 11 External links Definition[edit] An empire is an aggregate of many separate states or territories under a supreme ruler or oligarchy.[4] This is in contrast to a federation, which is an extensive state voluntarily composed of autonomous states and peoples. An empire is a large polity which rules over territories outside of its original borders. Definitions of what physically and politically constitute an empire vary. It might be a state affecting imperial policies or a particular political structure. Empires are typically formed from diverse ethnic, national, cultural, and religious components.[5] 'Empire' and 'colonialism' are used to refer to relationships between a powerful state or society versus a less powerful one; Michael W. Doyle has defined empire as "effective control, whether formal or informal, of a subordinated society by an imperial society".[6] Tom Nairn and Paul James define empires as polities that "extend relations of power across territorial spaces over which they have no prior or given legal sovereignty, and where, in one or more of the domains of economics, politics, and culture, they gain some measure of extensive hegemony over those spaces for the purpose of extracting or accruing value".[7] Rein Taagepera has defined an empire as "any relatively large sovereign political entity whose components are not sovereign".[8] The terrestrial empire's maritime analogue is the thalassocracy, an empire composed of islands and coasts which are accessible to its terrestrial homeland, such as the Athenian-dominated Delian League. Furthermore, empires can expand by both land and sea. Stephen Howe notes that empires by land can be characterized by expansion over terrain, "extending directly outwards from the original frontier"[9] while an empire by sea can be characterized by colonial expansion and empire building "by an increasingly powerful navy".[10] However, sometimes an empire is only a semantic construction, such as when a ruler assumes the title of "emperor".[11][12][13][14] That polity over which the ruler reigns logically becomes an "empire", despite having no additional territory or hegemony. Examples of this form of empire are the Central African Empire, or the Korean Empire proclaimed in 1897 when Korea, far from gaining new territory, was on the verge of being annexed by the Empire of Japan, one of the last to use the name officially. Among the last states in the 20th century known as empires in this sense were the Central African Empire, Ethiopia, Empire of Vietnam, Manchukuo, Russia, Germany, and Korea. Characteristics[edit] Empires originated as different types of states, although they commonly began as powerful monarchies. Ideas about empires have changed over time, ranging from public approval to universal distaste. Empires are built out of separate units with some kind of diversity – ethnic, national, cultural, religious – and imply at least some inequality between the rulers and the ruled. Without this inequality, the system would be seen as a commonwealth. Throughout history, the major powers of the world constantly seek to conquer other parts of the world. Imperialism is the idea of a major power controlling another nation or land with the intentions to use the native people and resources to help the mother country in any way possible. Many empires were the result of military conquest, incorporating the vanquished states into a political union, but imperial hegemony can be established in other ways. The Athenian Empire, the Roman Empire, and the British Empire developed at least in part under elective auspices. The Empire of Brazil declared itself an empire after separating from the Portuguese Empire in 1822. France has twice transitioned from being called the French Republic to being called the French Empire while it retained an overseas empire.[15] Diachronic map of the main empires of the modern era (1492–1945). Europeans began applying the designation of "empire" to non-European monarchies, such as the Qing Empire and the Mughal Empire, as well as the Maratha Empire, eventually leading to the looser denotations applicable to any political structure meeting the criteria of "imperium". Some monarchies styled themselves as having greater size, scope, and power than the territorial, politico-military, and economic facts support. As a consequence, some monarchs assumed the title of "emperor" (or its corresponding translation, tsar, empereur, kaiser, shah etc.) and renamed their states as "The Empire of ...". Empires were seen as an expanding power, administration, ideas and beliefs followed by cultural habits from place to place. Empires tend to impose their culture on the subject states to strengthen the imperial structure. This can have notable effects that outlast the empire itself, both positive and negative. Most histories of empires have been hostile, especially if the authors were promoting nationalism. Stephen Howe, although himself hostile, listed positive qualities: the guaranteed stability, security, and legal order for their subjects. They tried to minimize ethnic and religious antagonism inside the empire. The aristocracies that ruled them were often more cosmopolitan and broad-minded than their nationalistic successors. [16] History of imperialism[edit] For comprehensive historical coverage see Peter Stearns, ed. The Encyclopedia of World History: Ancient, Medieval, and Modern, Chronologically Arranged (6th ed. 2001). Bronze and Iron Age empires[edit] Early empires Achaemenid Empire of Persia at its zenith Maurya Empire of India at its greatest extent under Ashoka the Great The earliest known empire appeared in southern Egypt sometime around 3200 BC. Southern Egypt was divided by three kingdoms each centered on a powerful city. Hierapolis conquered the other two cities over two centuries, and later grew into the country of Egypt. The Akkadian Empire, established by Sargon of Akkad (24th century BC), was an early all-Mesopotamian empire. This imperial achievement was repeated by Hammurabi of Babylon in the 17th century BC. In the 15th century BC, the New Kingdom of Ancient Egypt, ruled by Thutmose III, was ancient Africa's major force upon incorporating Nubia and the ancient city-states of the Levant. Circa 1500 BC in China rose the Shang Empire which was succeeded by the Zhou Empire circa 1100 BC. Both surpassed in territory their contemporary Near Eastern empires. The Zhou Empire dissolved in 770 BC into feudal multi-state system which lasted for five and a half centuries until the universal conquest of Qin in 221 BC. The first empire comparable to Rome in organization was the Neo-Assyrian Empire (916–612 BC). The Median Empire was the first empire within the territory of Persia. By the 6th century BC, after having allied with the Babylonians to defeat the Neo-Assyrian Empire, the Medes were able to establish their own empire, which was the largest of its day and lasted for about sixty years.[17] Classical period[edit] Classical period The Roman Empire under Trajan (98–117). This would be the peak of the empire's territorial extent. Han Empire of China in 2 AD. The Axial Age (mid-First Millennium BC) witnessed unprecedented imperial expansion in the Indo-Mediterranean region and China.[18] The successful and extensive Achaemenid Empire (550–330 BC), also known as the first Persian Empire, covered Mesopotamia, Egypt, parts of Greece, Thrace, the Middle East, much of Central Asia, and North-Western India. It is considered the first great empire in history or the first "world empire".[19] It was overthrown and replaced by the short-lived empire of Alexander the Great. His Empire was succeeded by three Empires ruled by the Diadochi—the Seleucid, Ptolemaic, and Macedonian, which, despite being independent, are called the "Hellenistic Empire" by virtue of their similarities in culture and administration. Meanwhile, in the western Mediterranean the Empires of Carthage and Rome began their rise. Having decisively defeated Carthage in 202 BC, Rome defeated Macedonia in 200 BC and the Seleucids in 190–189 BC to establish an all-Mediterranean Empire. The Seleucid Empire broke apart and its former eastern part was absorbed by the Parthian Empire. In 30 BC Rome annexed Ptolemaic Egypt. In India during the Axial Age appeared the Maurya Empire—a geographically extensive and powerful empire, ruled by the Mauryan dynasty from 321 to 185 BC. The empire was founded in 322 BC by Chandragupta Maurya through the help of Chanakya,[20] who rapidly expanded his power westward across central and western India, taking advantage of the disruptions of local powers following the withdrawal by Alexander the Great. By 320 BC, the Maurya Empire had fully occupied northwestern India as well as defeating and conquering the satraps left by Alexander. Under Emperor Asoka the Great, the Maurya Empire became the first Indian empire to conquer the whole Indian Peninsula — an achievement repeated only twice, by the Gupta and Mughal Empires. In the reign of Asoka Buddhism spread to become the dominant religion in many parts of the ancient India.[21] In 221 BC, China became an empire when the State of Qin ended the chaotic Warring States period through its conquest of the other six states and proclaimed the Qin Empire (221–207 BC). The Qin Empire is known for the construction of the Great Wall of China and the Terracotta Army, as well as the standardization of currency, weights, measures and writing system. It laid the foundation for China's first golden age, the Han Empire (202 BC–AD 9, AD 25–220). The Han Empire expanded into Central Asia and established trade through the Silk Road. Confucianism was, for the first time, adopted as an official state ideology. During the reign of the Emperor Wu of Han, the Xiongnu were pacified. By this time, only four empires stretched between the Pacific and the Atlantic: the Han Empire of China, the Kushan Empire, the Parthian Empire of Persia, and the Roman Empire. The collapse of the Han Empire in AD 220 saw China fragmented into the Three Kingdoms, only to be unified once again by the Jin Empire (AD 266–420). The relative weakness of the Jin Empire plunged China into political disunity that would last from AD 304 to AD 589 when the Sui Empire (AD 581–618) reunited China.[22] Map showing the four empires of Eurasia in the 2nd century AD The Romans were the first people to invent and embody the concept of empire in their two mandates: to wage war and to make and execute laws.[2] They were the most extensive Western empire until the early modern period, and left a lasting impact on European society. Many languages, cultural values, religious institutions, political divisions, urban centers, and legal systems can trace their origins to the Roman Empire. The Roman Empire governed and rested on exploitative actions. They took slaves and money from the peripheries to support the imperial center.[2] However, the absolute reliance on conquered peoples to carry out the empire's fortune, sustain wealth, and fight wars would ultimately lead to the collapse of the Roman Empire.[2] The Romans were strong believers in what they called their "civilizing mission". This term was legitimized and justified by writers like Cicero who wrote that only under Roman rule could the world flourish and prosper.[2] This ideology, that was envisioned to bring a new world order, was eventually spread across the Mediterranean world and beyond. People started to build houses like Romans, eat the same food, wear the same clothes and engage in the same games.[2] Even rights of citizenship and authority to rule were granted to people not born within Roman territory.[2] The Latin word imperium, referring to a magistrate's power to command, gradually assumed the meaning "The territory in which a magistrate can effectively enforce his commands", while the term "imperator" was originally an honorific meaning "commander". The title was given to generals who were victorious in battle. Thus, an "empire" may include regions that are not legally within the territory of a state, but are under either direct or indirect control of that state, such as a colony, client state, or protectorate. Although historians use the terms "Republican Period" and "Imperial Period" to identify the periods of Roman history before and after absolute power was assumed by Augustus, the Romans themselves continued to refer to their government as a republic, and during the Republican Period, the territories controlled by the republic were referred to as "Imperium Romanum". The emperor's actual legal power derived from holding the office of "consul", but he was traditionally honored with the titles of imperator (commander) and princeps (first man or, chief). Later, these terms came to have legal significance in their own right; an army calling their general "imperator" was a direct challenge to the authority of the current emperor.[23] The legal systems of France and its former colonies are strongly influenced by Roman law.[24] Similarly, the United States was founded on a model inspired by the Roman Republic, with upper and lower legislative assemblies, and executive power vested in a single individual, the president. The president, as "commander-in-chief" of the armed forces, reflects the ancient Roman titles imperator princeps.[25] The Roman Catholic Church, founded in the early Imperial Period, spread across Europe, first by the activities of Christian evangelists, and later by official imperial promulgation. Post-classical period[edit] In Western Asia, the term "Persian Empire" came to denote the Iranian imperial states established at different historical periods of pre–Islamic and post–Islamic Persia.[26] In East Asia, various Chinese empires dominated the political, economic and cultural landscapes during this era, the most powerful of which was probably the Tang Empire (618–690, 705–907). Other influential Chinese empires during the post-classical period include the Sui Empire (581–618), the Great Liao Empire (916–1125), the Song Empire (960–1279), the Western Xia Empire (1038–1227), the Great Jin Empire (1115–1234), the Western Liao Empire (1124–1218), the Great Yuan Empire (1271–1368), and the Great Ming Empire (1368–1644). During this period, Japan and Korea underwent voluntary Sinicization.[27][28][29] The Sui, Tang and Song empires had the world's largest economy and were the most technologically advanced during their time;[30][31] the Great Yuan Empire was the world's ninth largest empire by total land area; while the Great Ming Empire is famous for the seven maritime expeditions led by Zheng He.[32] The 7th century saw the emergence of the Islamic Empire, also referred to as the Islamic Caliphate. The Rashidun Caliphate expanded from the Arabian Peninsula and swiftly conquered the Persian Empire and much of the Byzantine Roman Empire. Its successor state, the Umayyad Caliphate, expanded across North Africa and into the Iberian Peninsula. By the beginning of the 8th century, the Umayyad Caliphate had become the largest empire in history, it would not be surpassed in size until the establishment of the Mongol Empire in the 13th century. In 750 the Caliphate clashed with the Tang China at Talas. By this time only these two Empires stretched between the Atlantic and the Pacific. From the 11th century Moroccan empires began to appear, starting with the Almoravid Empire, dominating territories in both Europe as well as Sub-Saharan Africa.[33] Post-classical period Eastern Roman Empire in 555. The territory directly held by the Tang Empire of China and its sphere of influence. The Great Liao Empire, the Song Empire and the Western Xia Empire of China in 1111. The expansion of the Rashidun Empire. Mongol Empire in the 13th century. Ajuran Sultanate in the 15th century Almohad Empire 1147 - 1269 Bulgarian Empire in 850 The Ajuran Sultanate was a Somali empire in the medieval times that dominated the Indian Ocean trade. They belonged to the Somali Muslim sultanate [34][35][36] that ruled over large parts of the Horn of Africa in the Middle Ages. Through a strong centralized administration and an aggressive military stance towards invaders, the Ajuran Sultanate successfully resisted an Oromo invasion from the west and a Portuguese incursion from the east during the Gaal Madow and the Ajuran-Portuguese wars. Trading routes dating from the ancient and early medieval periods of Somali maritime enterprise were strengthened or re-established, and foreign trade and commerce in the coastal provinces flourished with ships sailing to and coming from many kingdoms and empires in East Asia, South Asia, Southeast Asia, Europe, Middle East, North Africa and East Africa.[37] In the 7th century, Maritime Southeast Asia witnessed the rise of a Buddhist thallasocracy, the Srivijaya Empire, which thrived for 600 years and was succeeded by the Hindu-Buddhist Majapahit Empire that ruled from the 13th to 15th centuries. In the Southeast Asian mainland, the Hindu-Buddhist Khmer Empire was centered in the city of Angkor and flourished from the 9th to 13th centuries. Following the demise of the Khmer Empire, the Siamese Empire flourished alongside the Burmese and Lan Chang Empires from the 13th through the 18th centuries. In Southeastern and Eastern Europe, during the year of 917, the Eastern Roman Empire, sometimes called Byzantine Empire, was forced to recognize the Imperial title of Bulgarian ruler Simeon the Great, who were then called Tsar, the first ruler to hold that precise imperial title. The Bulgarian Empire, establishes in the region in 680/681, remained a major power in Southeast Europe until its fall in the late 14th century. Bulgaria gradually reached its cultural and territorial apogee in the 9th century and early 10th century under Prince Boris I and Simeon I, when its early Christianization in 864 allowed it to develop into the cultural and literary center of Slavic Europe, as well as one of the largest states in Europe, thus the period is considered the Golden Age of medieval Bulgarian culture. Major events included the development of the Cyrillic script at the Preslav Literary School, declared official in 893, and the establishment of the liturgy in Old Church Slavonic, also called Old Bulgarian.[38][39][40] At the time, in the Medieval West, the title "empire" had a specific technical meaning that was exclusively applied to states that considered themselves the heirs and successors of the Roman Empire. Among these were the "Byzantine Empire", which was the actual continuation of the Eastern portion of the Roman Empire, the Carolingian Empire, the largely Germanic Holy Roman Empire, and the Russian Empire. Yet, these states did not always fit the geographic, political, or military profiles of empires in the modern sense of the word. To legitimise their imperium, these states directly claimed the title of Empire from Rome. The sacrum Romanum imperium (Holy Roman Empire), which lasted from 800 to 1806, claimed to have exclusively comprehended Christian principalities, and was only nominally a discrete imperial state. The Holy Roman Empire was not always centrally-governed, as it had neither core nor peripheral territories, and was not governed by a central, politico-military elite. Hence, Voltaire's remark that the Holy Roman Empire "was neither holy, nor Roman, nor an empire" is accurate to the degree that it ignores[41] German rule over Italian, French, Provençal, Polish, Flemish, Dutch, and Bohemian populations, and the efforts of the ninth-century Holy Roman Emperors (i.e., the Ottonians) to establish central control. Voltaire's "nor an empire" observation applies to its late period. In 1204, after the Fourth Crusade conquered Constantinople, the crusaders established a Latin Empire (1204–1261) in that city, while the defeated Byzantine Empire's descendants established two smaller, short-lived empires in Asia Minor: the Empire of Nicaea (1204–1261) and the Empire of Trebizond (1204–1461). Constantinople was retaken in 1261 by the Byzantine successor state centered in Nicaea, re-establishing the Byzantine Empire until 1453, by which time the Turkish-Muslim Ottoman Empire (ca. 1300–1918), had conquered most of the region. The Ottoman Empire was a successor of the Abbasid Empire and it was the most powerful empire to succeed the Abbasi empires at the time, as well as one of the most powerful empires in the world.[42] The Ottoman Empire centered on modern day Turkey, dominated the eastern Mediterranean, overthrew the Byzantine Empire to claim Constantinople and it would start battering at Austria and Malta, which were countries that were key to central and to south-west Europe respectively — mainly for their geographical location.[42] The reason these occurrences of batterings were so important was because the Ottomans were Muslim, and the rest of Europe was Christian, so there was a sense of religious fighting going on.[42] This was not just a rivalry of East and West but a rivalry between Christians and Muslims.[42] Both the Christians and Muslims had alliances with other countries, and they had problems in them as well.[42] The flows of trade and of cultural influences across the supposed great divide never ceased, so the countries never stopped bartering with each other.[2] These epochal clashes between civilizations profoundly shaped many people's thinking back then, and continues to do so in the present day.[43] Modern hatred against Muslim communities in South-Eastern Europe, mainly in Bosnia and Kosovo, has often been articulated in terms of seeing them as unwelcome residues of this imperialism: in short, as Turks.[44] Moreover, Eastern Orthodox imperialism was not re-established until the coronation of Peter the Great as Emperor of Russia in 1721. Likewise, with the collapse of the Holy Roman Empire in 1806 during the Napoleonic Wars (1803–1815), the Austrian Empire (1804–1867) emerged reconstituted as the Empire of Austria–Hungary (1867–1918), having "inherited" the imperium of Central and Western Europe from the losers of said wars. In the thirteenth century, Genghis Khan expanded the Mongol Empire to be the largest contiguous empire in the world. However, within two generations, the empire was separated into four discrete khanates under Genghis Khan's grandsons. One of them, Kublai Khan, conquered China and established the Yuan dynasty with the imperial capital at Beijing. One family ruled the whole Eurasian land mass from the Pacific to the Adriatic and Baltic Seas. The emergence of the Pax Mongolica had significantly eased trade and commerce across Asia. The Safavid Empire of Iran was also founded. [45][46] The Age of the Islamic Gunpowders started to develop from the 15th century.[47] In the Indian subcontinent, the Delhi Sultanate conquered most of the Indian peninsula and spread Islam across it. It later got broken with the establishment of the Bengal Sultanate. In the 15th century, the Mughal Empire was founder by Timur and Genghis Khan's direct descendant Babur. His successors such Humayun, Akbar, Jahangir and Shah Jahan extended the empire. Meanwhile, the Sur Empire was also established in the north by Sher Shah Suri. In the 17th century, Muhammad Aurangzeb Alamgir expanded the Mughal Empire, controlling most of the South Asia through Sharia,[48][49] which became the world's largest economy and leading manufacturing power with a nominal GDP that valued a quarter of world GDP, superior than the combination of Europe's GDP.[50][51] It has been estimated that the Mughal emperors controlled an unprecedented one-fourth of the world's entire economy and was home to one-fourth of the world's population at the time.[52] After the death of Aurangzeb, which marks the end of the medieval India and the beginning of European invasion in India, the empire was weakened by Nader Shah's invasion.[53] The Mysore Empire was soon established by Hyder Ali and Tipu Sultan, allies of Napoleone Bonaparte.[54][55][56] Other independent empires were also been established, such as those ruled by the Nawabs of Bengal and Murshidabad[57] and Hyderabad State's Nizam of Hyderabad.[58] In the pre-Columbian Americas, two Empires were prominent—the Azteca in Mesoamerica and Inca in Peru. Both existed for several generations before the arrival of the Europeans. Inca had gradually conquered the whole of the settled Andean world as far south as today Santiago in Chile. In Oceania, the Tonga Empire was a lonely empire that existed from the Late Middle Ages to the Modern period.[59] Colonial empires[edit] All areas of the world that were once part of the Portuguese Empire. The Portuguese established in the early 16th century together with the Spanish Empire the first global empire and trade network.[60] This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (April 2019) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) In the 15th century, Castile (Spain) landing in the so-called "New World" (first, the Americas, and later Australia), along with Portuguese travels around the Cape of Good Hope and along the coast of Africa bordering the southeast Indian Ocean, proved ripe opportunities for the continent's Renaissance-era monarchies to establish colonial empires like those of the ancient Romans and Greeks. In the Old World, colonial imperialism was attempted and established on the Canary Islands and Ireland. These conquered lands and people became de jure subordinates of the empire, rather than de facto imperial territories and subjects. Such subjugation often elicited "client-state" resentment that the empire unwisely ignored, leading to the collapse of the European colonial imperial system in the late 19th through the mid-20th century. Portuguese discovery of Newfoundland in the New World gave way to many expeditions led by England (later Britain), Spain, France, and the Dutch Republic. In the 18th century, the Spanish Empire was at its height because of the great mass of goods taken from conquered territory in the Americas (nowadays Mexico, parts of the United States, the Caribbean, most of Central America, and South America) and the Philippines. Modern period[edit] Modern period Red shows self-governing North American British colonies and pink shows claimed and largely indirectly controlled territories in 1775. In the year 1690, the realms of the Mughal Empire spanned from Kabul in the west to Cape Comorin, Tamil Nadu in the south.[61] The Ottoman Empire at its greatest extent. The Spanish–Portuguese Empire of the Iberian Union (1580–1640) was the first global imperial entity. The map includes all Spanish territories, but only territories Portugal had during the Iberian Union. The Russian Empire in 1866 became the second largest contiguous empire to have ever existed. The Russian Federation is currently the largest state on the planet. In 1920, the British Empire was the largest empire in history. The evolution of the French Empire in the 18th to the 20th century. The 19th to 20th century Japanese Empire at its maximum extent, 1942. The territory ruled by the Great Qing Empire of China in 1820. The German Empire in 1914. The British established their first empire (1583–1783) in North America by colonising lands that made up British America, including parts of Canada, the Caribbean and the Thirteen Colonies. In 1776, the Continental Congress of the Thirteen Colonies declared itself independent from the British Empire, thus beginning the American Revolution. Britain turned towards Asia, the Pacific, and later Africa, with subsequent exploration leading to the rise of the Second British Empire (1783–1815), which was followed by the Industrial Revolution and Britain's Imperial Century (1815–1914). It became the largest empire in world history, encompassing one quarter of the world's land area and one fifth of its population.[62] The impacts of this period are still prominent in the current age "including widespread use of the English language, belief in Protestant religion, economic globalization, modern precepts of law and order, and representative democracy."[63][64] The Great Qing Empire of China (1636–1912) was the fifth largest empire in world history by total land area, and laid the foundation for the modern territorial claims of both the People's Republic of China and the Republic of China. Apart from having direct control over much of East Asia, the empire also exerted domination over other states through the Chinese tributary system. The multiethnic and multicultural nature of the Great Qing Empire was crucial to the subsequent birth of the nationalistic concept of zhonghua minzu. The empire reached its peak during the reign of the Qianlong Emperor, after which the empire entered a period of prolonged decline, culminating in its collapse as a result of the Xinhai Revolution. The Ashanti Empire (or Confederacy), also Asanteman (1701–1896), was a West African state of the Ashanti, the Akan people of the Ashanti Region, Akanland in modern-day Ghana. The Ashanti (or Asante) were a powerful, militaristic and highly disciplined people in West Africa. Their military power, which came from effective strategy and an early adoption of European firearms, created an empire that stretched from central Akanland (in modern-day Ghana) to present day Benin and Ivory Coast, bordered by the Dagomba kingdom to the north and Dahomey to the east. Due to the empire's military prowess, sophisticated hierarchy, social stratification and culture, the Ashanti empire had one of the largest historiographies of any indigenous Sub-Saharan African political entity. The Sikh Empire (1799–1846) was established in the Punjab region of India. The empire collapsed when its founder, Ranjit Singh, died and its army fell to the British. During the same period, the Maratha Empire (also known as the Maratha Confederacy) was a Hindu state located in present-day India. It existed from 1674 to 1818, and at its peak, the empire's territories covered much of Southern Asia. The empire was founded and consolidated by Shivaji. After the death of Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb, it expanded greatly under the rule of the Peshwas. In 1761, the Maratha army lost the Third Battle of Panipat, which halted the expansion of the empire. Later, the empire was divided into a confederacy of states which, in 1818, were lost to the British during the Anglo-Maratha wars.[65] The French emperors Napoleon I and Napoleon III (See: Premier Empire, Second French Empire) each attempted establishing a western imperial hegemony centered in France. The French colonial empire constituted the overseas colonies, protectorates and mandate territories that came under French rule from the 16th century onward. A distinction is generally made between the "first colonial empire," that existed until 1814, and the "second colonial empire", which began with the conquest of Algiers in 1830. The second colonial empire came to an end after the decolonizations of Indochina (1954), Algeria (1962) and French Africa. At its apex, it was one of the largest empires in history; including metropolitan France, the total amount of land under French sovereignty reached 11,500,000 km2 (4,400,000 sq mi), with a population of 110 million people in 1939. The Empire of Brazil (1822–1889) was the only South American modern monarchy, established by the heir of the Portuguese Empire as an independent nation eventually became an emerging international power. The new country was huge but sparsely populated and ethnically diverse. In 1889 the monarchy was overthrown in a sudden coup d'état led by a clique of military leaders whose goal was the formation of a republic. The German Empire (1871–1918), another "heir to the Holy Roman Empire", arose in 1871. The term "American Empire" refers to the United States' cultural ideologies and foreign policy strategies. The term is most commonly used to describe the U.S.'s status since the 20th century, but it can also be applied to the United States' world standing before the rise of nationalism in the 20th century.[66] The United States is not traditionally recognized as an empire, in part because the U.S. adopted a different political system from those that previous empires had used. Despite these systematic differences, the political objectives and strategies of the United States government have been quite similar to those of previous empires.[67] Due to this similarity some scholars confess: "When it walks like a duck, talks like a duck, it's a duck."[68][69][70] Academic, Krishna Kumar, argues the distinct principles of nationalism and imperialism may result in common practice; that is, the pursuit of nationalism can often coincide with the pursuit of imperialism in terms of strategy and decision making.[71] Throughout the 19th century, the United States government attempted to expand its territory by any means necessary. Regardless of the supposed motivation for this constant expansion, all of these land acquisitions were carried out by imperialistic means. This was done by financial means in some cases, and by military force in others. Most notably, the Louisiana Purchase (1803), the Texas Annexation (1845), and the Mexican Cession (1848) highlight the imperialistic goals of the United States during this “modern period” of imperialism. The U.S. government has stopped adding additional territories, where they permanently and politically take over since the early 20th century, and instead have established 800 military bases as their outposts. [72] With this overt but subtile military control of other countries, scholars consider U.S. foreign policy strategies to be imperialistic.[73] This idea is explored in the "contemporary usage" section. Transition from empire[edit] In time, an empire may change from one political entity to another. For example, the Holy Roman Empire, a German re-constitution of the Roman Empire, metamorphosed into various political structures (i.e., federalism), and eventually, under Habsburg rule, re-constituted itself in 1804 as the Austrian Empire, an empire of much different politics and scope, which in turn became the Austro-Hungarian Empire in 1867. The Roman Empire, perennially reborn, also lived on as the Byzantine Empire (Eastern Roman Empire) – temporarily splitting into the Latin Empire, the Empire of Nicaea and the Empire of Trebizond before its remaining territory and centre became part of the Ottoman Empire. A similarly persistent concept of empire saw the Mongol Empire become the Khanate of the Golden Horde, the Yuan Empire of China, and the Ilkhanate before resurrection as the Timurid Empire and as the Mughal Empire. After 1945 the Empire of Japan retained its Emperor but lost its colonial possessions and became the State of Japan. An autocratic empire can become a republic (e.g., the Central African Empire in 1979), or it can become a republic with its imperial dominions reduced to a core territory (e.g., Weimar Germany shorn of the German colonial empire (1918–1919), or the Ottoman Empire (1918–1923)). The dissolution of the Austro-Hungarian Empire after 1918 provides an example of a multi-ethnic superstate broken into constituent nation-oriented states: the republics, kingdoms, and provinces of Austria, Hungary, Transylvania, Croatia, Slovenia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Czechoslovakia, Ruthenia, Galicia, et al. In the aftermath of World War I the Russian Empire also broke up and became reduced to the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic (RSFSR) before re-forming as the USSR (1922–1991) – sometimes seen as the core of a Soviet Empire. After the Second World War (1939–1945), the deconstruction of colonial empires quickened and became commonly known as decolonisation. The British Empire evolved into a loose, multinational Commonwealth of Nations, while the French colonial empire metamorphosed to a Francophone commonwealth. The same process happened to the Portuguese Empire, which evolved into a Lusophone commonwealth, and to the former territories of the extinct Spanish Empire, which alongside the Lusophone countries of Portugal and Brazil, created an Ibero-American commowealth. France returned the French territory of Kwang-Chou-Wan to China in 1946. The British gave Hong Kong back to China in 1997 after 150 years of rule. The Portuguese territory of Macau reverted to China in 1999. Macau and Hong Kong did not become part of the provincial structure of China; they have autonomous systems of government as Special Administrative Regions of the People's Republic of China. France still governs overseas territories (French Guiana, Martinique, Réunion, French Polynesia, New Caledonia, Saint Martin, Saint-Pierre-et-Miquelon, Guadeloupe, TAAF, Wallis and Futuna, Saint Barthélemy, and Mayotte), and exerts hegemony in Francophone Africa (29 francophone countries such as Chad, Rwanda, et cetera). Fourteen British Overseas Territories remain under British sovereignty. Sixteen countries of the Commonwealth of Nations share their head of state, Queen Elizabeth II, as Commonwealth Realms. In 2004 Eliot A. Cohen summarized the contemporary transition from empire: "The Age of Empire may indeed have ended, but then an age of American hegemony has begun, regardless of what one calls it."[74] Fall of empires[edit] Roman Empire[edit] Further information: Fall of the Western Roman Empire The fall of the western half of the Roman Empire is seen as one of the most pivotal points in all of human history. This event traditionally marks the transition from classical civilization to the birth of Europe. The Roman Empire started to decline at the end of the reign of the last of the Five Good Emperors, Marcus Aurelius in 161–180 A.D. There is still a debate over the cause of the fall of one of the largest empires in history. Piganiol argues that the Roman Empire under its authority can be described as "a period of terror",[75] holding its imperial system accountable for its failure. Another theory blames the rise of Christianity as the cause, arguing that the spread of certain Christian ideals caused internal weakness of the military and state.[76] In the book The Fall of the Roman Empire, by Peter Heather, he contends that there are many factors, including issues of money and manpower, which produce military limitations and culminate in the Roman army's inability to effectively repel invading barbarians at the frontier.[77] The Western Roman economy was already stretched to its limit in the 4th and 5th Centuries C.E. due to continual conflict and loss of territory which, in turn, generated loss of revenue from the tax base. There was also the looming presence of the Persians which, at any time, took a large percentage of the fighting force's attention. At the same time the Huns, a nomadic warrior people from the steppes of Asia, are also putting extreme pressure on the German tribes outside of the Roman frontier, which gave the German tribes no other choice, geographically, but to move into Roman territory. At this point, without increased funding, the Roman army could no longer effectively defend its borders against major waves of Germanic tribes. This inability is illustrated by the crushing defeat at Adrianople in 378 C.E. and, later, the Battle of Frigidus. Contemporary usage[edit] Main article: Imperialism Contemporaneously, the concept of empire is politically valid, yet is not always used in the traditional sense. For example, Japan is considered the world's sole remaining empire because of the continued presence of the Japanese Emperor in national politics. Despite the semantic reference to imperial power, Japan is a de jure constitutional monarchy, with a homogeneous population of 127 million people that is 98.5 percent ethnic Japanese, making it one of the largest nation-states.[78] Characterising some aspects of the United States in regards to its territorial expansion, foreign policy, and its international behaviour as "American Empire" is controversial but not uncommon. This characterisation is controversial because of the strong tendency in American society to reject claims of American imperialism. The initial motivations for the inception of the United States eventually led to the development of this tendency, which has been perpetuated by the country-wide obsession with this national narrative. The United States was formed because colonists did not like being under control of the British Empire. Essentially, the United States was formed in an attempt to reject imperialism. This makes it very hard for people to acknowledge America's status as an empire. This active rejection of imperialist status is not limited to high-ranking government officials, as it has been ingrained in American society throughout its entire history. As David Ludden explains, "journalists, scholars, teachers, students, analysts, and politicians prefer to depict the U.S. as a nation pursuing its own interests and ideals".[79] This often results in imperialist endeavors being presented as measures taken to enhance state security. Ludden explains this phenomenon with the concept of "ideological blinders", which he says prevent American citizens from realizing the true nature of America's current systems and strategies. These "ideological blinders" that people wear have resulted in an "invisible" American empire of which most American citizens are unaware.[79] Stuart Creighton Miller posits that the public's sense of innocence about Realpolitik (cf. American exceptionalism) impairs popular recognition of US imperial conduct since it governed other countries via surrogates. These surrogates were domestically-weak, right-wing governments that would collapse without US support.[80] Former President G. W. Bush's Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld, said: "We don't seek empires. We're not imperialistic; we never have been."[81] This statement directly contradicts Thomas Jefferson who, in the 1780s while awaiting the fall of the Spanish empire, said: "till our population can be sufficiently advanced to gain it from them piece by piece".[82][83][84] In turn, historian Sidney Lens argues that from its inception, the US has used every means available to dominate foreign peoples and states.[85] Since the European Union was formed as a polity in 1993, it has established its own currency, its own citizenship, established discrete military forces, and exercises its limited hegemony in the Mediterranean, eastern parts of Europe, Sub-Saharan Africa, and Asia. The big size and high development index of the EU economy often has the ability to influence global trade regulations in its favour. The political scientist Jan Zielonka suggests that this behaviour is imperial because it coerces its neighbouring countries into adopting its European economic, legal, and political structures.[86][87][88][89][90][91] In his book review of Empire (2000) by Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri, Mehmet Akif Okur posits that since the 11 September 2001 terrorist attacks in the US, the international relations determining the world's balance of power (political, economic, military) have been altered. These alterations include the intellectual (political science) trends that perceive the contemporary world's order via the re-territorrialisation of political space, the re-emergence of classical imperialist practices (the "inside" vs. "outside" duality, cf. the Other), the deliberate weakening of international organisations, the restructured international economy, economic nationalism, the expanded arming of most countries, the proliferation of nuclear weapon capabilities and the politics of identity emphasizing a state's subjective perception of its place in the world, as a nation and as a civilisation. These changes constitute the "Age of Nation Empires"; as imperial usage, nation-empire denotes the return of geopolitical power from global power blocs to regional power blocs (i.e., centred upon a "regional power" state [China, EU, Russia, US, et al.]) and regional multi-state power alliances (i.e., Mediterranean, Latin America, South East Asia). Nation-empire regionalism claims sovereignty over their respective (regional) political (social, economic, ideologic), cultural, and military spheres.[92] Timeline of empires[edit] This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (April 2019) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) The chart below shows a timeline of polities that have been called empires. Dynastic changes are marked with a white line.[93] The Roman Empire's timeline listed below only includes the Western portion. The Byzantine continuation of the Roman Empire is listed separately. The Empires of Nicaea and Trebizond were Byzantine successor states. The Empire of Bronze Age Egypt is not included in the graph. Established by Narmer circa 3000 BC, it lasted as long as China until it was conquered by Achaemenid Persia in 525 BC. Japan is presented for the period of its overseas Empire (1895–1945). The original Japanese Empire of "the Eight Islands" would be third persistent after Egypt and China. Many Indian empires are also included, though only Mauryans, Guptas, Delhi Sultans, Mughals and Marathas ruled most of the India. Theoretical research[edit] The Seven Stages of Empire[edit] The military historian Sir John Bagot Glubb studied eleven empires starting with the Assyrians in 859 B.C. and ending with the British in 1950 A.D. Sir John determined that each followed a remarkably similar pattern from birth to demise. Spanning a period of about ten generations, each went through 7 Stages of Empire:[94] The Age of Pioneers (Outburst) The Age of Conquests The Age of Commerce The Age of Affluence The Age of Intellect The Age of Decadence The Age of Decline & Collapse Glubb noted that in all these example, the penultimate age was marked by defensiveness, pessimism, materialism, frivolity, an influx of foreigners, the Welfare State, and a weakening of religion. He attributed this decadence to an excessively long period of wealth and power, selfishness, love of money, and the loss of a sense of duty. Mike Maloney, an economist, arrived at exactly the same conclusion but in Economic terms whilst studying the history of money. His 7 stages were: [95] The Age of Good Money The Age of Public Works The Age of Military Expansionism The Age of War The Age of Currency Debasement The Age of Monetary Inflation The Age of Financial Decline & Fiscal Collapse Empire versus nation state[edit] Empires have been the dominant international organization in world history: The fact that tribes, peoples, and nations have made empires points to a fundamental political dynamic, one that helps explain why empires cannot be confined to a particular place or era but emerged and reemerged over thousands of years and on all continents.[96] Empires ... can be traced as far back as the recorded history goes; indeed, most history is the history of empires ... It is the nation-state—an essentially 19th-century ideal—that is the historical novelty and that may yet prove to be the more ephemeral entity.[97] Our field’s fixation on the Westphalian state has tended to obscure the fact that the main actors in global politics, for most of time immemorial, have been empires rather than states ... In fact, it is a very distorted view of even the Westphalian era not to recognize that it was always at least as much about empires as it was states. Almost all of the emerging European states no sooner began to consolidate than they were off on campaigns of conquest and commerce to the farthest reaches of the globe… Ironically, it was the European empires that carried the idea of the sovereign territorial state to the rest of the world ...[98] Empire has been the historically predominant form of order in world politics. Looking at a time frame of several millennia, there was no global anarchic system until the European explorations and subsequent imperial and colonial ventures connected disparate regional systems, doing so approximately 500 years ago. Prior to this emergence of a global-scope system, the pattern of world politics was characterized by regional systems. These regional systems were initially anarchic and marked by high levels of military competition. But almost universally, they tended to consolidate into regional empires ... Thus it was empires—not anarchic state systems—that typically dominated the regional systems in all parts of the world ... Within this global pattern of regional empires, European political order was distinctly anomalous because it persisted so long as an anarchy.[99] Similarly, Anthony Pagden, Eliot A. Cohen, Jane Burbank and Frederick Cooper estimate that "empires have always been more frequent, more extensive political and social forms than tribal territories or nations have ever been".[100] Many empires endured for centuries, while the age of the ancient Egyptian, Chinese and Japanese Empires is counted in millennia. "Most people throughout history have lived under imperial rule."[101] Empires have played a long and critical part in human history ... [Despite] efforts in words and wars to put national unity at the center of political imagination, imperial politics, imperial practices, and imperial cultures have shaped the world we live in ... Rome was evoked as a model of splendor and order into the Twentieth century and beyond… By comparison, the nation-state appears as a blip on the historical horizon, a state form that emerged recently from under imperial skies and whose hold on the world's political imagination may well prove partial or transitory… The endurance of empire challenges the notion that the nation-state is natural, necessary, and inevitable ...[102] Political scientist Hedley Bull wrote that "in the broad sweep of human history ... the form of states system has been the exception rather than the rule".[103] His colleague Robert Gilpin confirmed this conclusion for the pre-modern period: The history of interstate relations was largely that of successive great empires. The pattern of international political change during the millennia of the pre-modern era has been described as an imperial cycle ... World politics was characterized by the rise and decline of powerful empires, each of which in turn unified and ordered its respective international system. The recurrent pattern in every civilization of which we have knowledge was for one state to unify the system under its imperial domination. The propensity toward universal empire was the principal feature of pre-modern politics.[104] Historian Michael Doyle who undertook an extensive research on empires extended the observation into the modern era: Empires have been the key actors in world politics for millennia. They helped create the interdependent civilizations of all the continents ... Imperial control stretches through history, many say, to the present day. Empires are as old as history itself ... They have held the leading role ever since.[105] Universal empire[edit] Expert on warfare Quincy Wright generalized on what he called "universal empire"—empire unifying all the contemporary system: Balance of power systems have in the past tended, through the process of conquest of lesser states by greater states, towards reduction in the number of states involved, and towards less frequent but more devastating wars, until eventually a universal empire has been established through the conquest by one of all those remaining.[106] German Sociologist Friedrich Tenbruck finds that the macro-historic process of imperial expansion gave rise to global history in which the formations of universal empires were most significant stages.[107] A later group of political scientists, working on the phenomenon of the current unipolarity, in 2007 edited research on several pre-modern civilizations by experts in respective fields. The overall conclusion was that the balance of power was inherently unstable order and usually soon broke in favor of imperial order.[108] Yet before the advent of the unipolarity, world historian Arnold Toynbee and political scientist Martin Wight had drawn the same conclusion with an unambiguous implication for the modern world: When this [imperial] pattern of political history is found in the New World as well as in the Old World, it looks as if the pattern must be intrinsic to the political history of societies of the species we call civilizations, in whatever part of the world the specimens of this species occur. If this conclusion is warranted, it illuminates our understanding of civilization itself.[109] Most states systems have ended in universal empire, which has swallowed all the states of the system. The examples are so abundant that we must ask two questions: Is there any states system which has not led fairly directly to the establishment of a world empire? Does the evidence rather suggest that we should expect any states system to culminate in this way? ... It might be argued that every state system can only maintain its existence on the balance of power, that the latter is inherently unstable, and that sooner or later its tensions and conflicts will be resolved into a monopoly of power.[110] The earliest thinker to approach the phenomenon of universal empire from a theoretical point of view was Polybius (2:3): In previous times events in the world occurred without impinging on one another ... [Then] history became a whole, as if a single body; events in Italy and Libya came to be enmeshed with those in Asia and Greece, and everything gets directed towards one single goal. Fichte, having witnessed the battle at Jena in 1806 when Napoleon overwhelmed Prussia, described what he perceived as a deep historical trend: There is necessary tendency in every cultivated State to extend itself generally ... Such is the case in Ancient History ... As the States become stronger in themselves and cast off that [Papal] foreign power, the tendency towards a Universal Monarchy over the whole Christian World necessarily comes to light ... This tendency ... has shown itself successively in several States which could make pretensions to such a dominion, and since the fall of the Papacy, it has become the sole animating principle of our History ... Whether clearly or not—it may be obscurely—yet has this tendency lain at the root of the undertakings of many States in Modern Times ... Although no individual Epoch may have contemplated this purpose, yet is this the spirit which runs through all these individual Epochs, and invisibly urges them onward.[111] Fichte's later compatriot, Geographer Alexander von Humboldt (1769–1859), in the mid-Nineteenth century observed a macro-historic trend of imperial growth in both Hemispheres: "Men of great and strong minds, as well as whole nations, acted under influence of one idea, the purity of which was utterly unknown to them."[112] The imperial expansion filled the world circa 1900.[113][114] Two famous contemporary observers—Frederick Turner and Halford Mackinder described the event and drew implications, the former predicting American overseas expansion[115] and the latter stressing that the world empire is now in sight.[116] Friedrich Ratzel, writing at the same time, observed that the "drive toward the building of continually larger states continues throughout the entirety of history" and is active in the present.[117] He drew "Seven Laws of Expansionism". His seventh law stated: "The general trend toward amalgamation transmits the tendency of territorial growth from state to state and increases the tendency in the process of transmission." He commented on this law to make its meaning clear: "There is on this small planet sufficient space for only one great state."[118] Two other contemporaries—Kang Yu-wei and George Vacher de Lapouge—stressed that imperial expansion cannot indefinitely proceed on the definite surface of the globe and therefore world empire is imminent. Kang Yu-wei in 1885 believed that the imperial trend will culminate in the contest between Washington and Berlin[119] and Vacher de Lapouge in 1899 estimated that the final contest will be between Russia and America in which America is likely to triumph.[120] The above envisaged contests indeed took place, known to us as World War I and II. Writing during the Second, political scientists Derwent Whittlesey, Robert Strausz-Hupé and John H. Herz concluded: “Now that the earth is at last parceled out, consolidation has commenced.”[121] In "this world of fighting superstates there could be no end to war until one state had subjected all others, until world empire had been achieved by the strongest. This undoubtedly is the logical final stage in the geopolitical theory of evolution."[122] The world is no longer large enough to harbor several self-contained powers ... The trend toward world domination or hegemony of a single power is but the ultimate consummation of a power-system engrafted upon an otherwise integrated world.[123] Writing in the last year of the War, German Historian Ludwig Dehio drew a similar conclusion: [T]he old European tendency toward division is now being thrust aside by the new global trend toward unification. And the onrush of this trend may not come to rest until it has asserted itself throughout our planet ... The global order still seems to be going through its birth pangs ... With the last tempest barely over, a new one is gathering.[124] The year after the War and in the first year of the nuclear age, Albert Einstein and British Philosopher Bertrand Russell, known as prominent pacifists, outlined for the near future a perspective of world empire (world government established by force). Einstein believed that, unless world government is established by agreement, an imperial world government would come by war or wars.[125] Russell expected a third World War to result in a world government under the empire of the United States.[126] Three years later, another prominent pacifist, Theologian Reinhold Niebuhr, generalized on the ancient Empires of Egypt, Babylon, Persia and Greece to imply for the modern world: "The analogy in present global terms would be the final unification of the world through the preponderant power of either America or Russia, whichever proved herself victorious in the final struggle."[127] Russian colleague of Russell and Neighbour, Georgy Fedotov, wrote in 1945: All empires are but stages on the way to the sole Empire which must swallow all others. The only question is who will build it and on which foundations. Universal unity is the only alternative to annihilation. Unity by conference is utopian but unity by conquest by the strongest Power is not and probably the uncompleted in this War will be completed in the next. "Pax Atlantica" is the best of possible outcomes.[128] Originally drafted as a secret study for the Office of Strategic Services (the precursor of the CIA) in 1944[129] and published as a book three years later, The Struggle for the World... by James Burnham concludes: If either of the two Superpowers wins, the result would be a universal empire which in our case would also be a world empire. The historical stage for a world empire had already been set prior to and independently of the discovery of atomic weapons but these weapons make a world empire inevitable and imminent. "The atomic weapons ... will not permit the world to wait." Only a world empire can establish monopoly on atomic weapons and thus guarantee the survival of civilization. A world empire "is in fact the objective of the Third World War which, in its preliminary stages, has already began". The issue of a world empire "will be decided, and in our day. In the course of the decision, both of the present antagonists may, it is true, be destroyed, but one of them must be."[130] In 1951, Hans Morgenthau concluded that the "best" outcome of World War III would be world empire: Today war has become an instrument of universal destruction, an instrument that destroys the victor and the vanquished ... At worst, victor and loser would be undistinguishable under the leveling impact of such a catastrophe ... At best, the destruction on one side would not be quite as great as on the other; the victor would be somewhat better off than the loser and would establish, with the aid of modern technology, his domination over the world.[131] Expert on earlier civilizations, Toynbee, further developed the subject of World War III leading to world empire: The outcome of the Third World War ... seemed likely to be the imposition of an ecumenical peace of the Roman kind by the victor whose victory would leave him with a monopoly on the control of atomic energy in his grasp ... This denouement was foreshadowed, not only by present facts, but by historical precedents, since, in the histories of other civilizations, the time of troubles had been apt to culminate in the delivery of a knock-out blow resulting in the establishment of a universal state ...[132] The year this volume of A Study of History was published, US Secretary of State John Foster Dulles announced "a knock-out blow" as an official doctrine, a detailed Plan was elaborated and Fortune magazine mapped the design.[133] Section VIII, "Atomic Armaments", of the famous National Security Council Report 68 (NSC 68), approved by President Harry Truman in 1951, uses the term "blow" 17 times, mostly preceded by such adjectives as "powerful", "overwhelming", or "crippling". Another term applied by the strategists was "Sunday punch".[134] A pupil of Toynbee, William McNeill, associated on the case of ancient China, which "put a quietus upon the disorders of the warring states by erecting an imperial bureaucratic structure ... The warring states of the Twentieth century seem headed for a similar resolution of their conflicts."[135] The ancient "resolution" McNeill evoked was one of the most sweeping universal conquests in world history, performed by Qin in 230–221 BC. Chinese classic Sima Qian (d. 86 BC) described the event (6:234): "Qin raised troops on grand scale" and "the whole world celebrated a great bacchanal". Herman Kahn of the RAND Corporation criticized to an assembled group of SAC officers their war plan (SIOP-62). He did not use the term bacchanal but he coined on the occasion an associating word: "Gentlemen, you do not have a war plan. You have a wargasm!"[136] History did not completely repeat itself but it passed close. Circumscription theory[edit] Main article: Carneiro's circumscription theory According to the circumscription theory of Robert Carneiro, "the more sharply circumscribed area, the more rapidly it will become politically unified."[137] The Empires of Egypt,[138][139] China[140] and Japan are named the most durable political structures in human history. Correspondingly, these are the three most circumscribed civilizations in human history. The Empires of Egypt (established by Narmer c. 3000 BC) and China (established by Cheng in 221 BC) endured for over two millennia. German Sociologist Friedrich Tenbruck, criticizing the Western idea of progress, emphasized that China and Egypt remained at one particular stage of development for millennia. This stage was universal empire. The development of Egypt and China came to a halt once their empires "reached the limits of their natural habitat".[141] Sinology does not recognize the Eurocentric view of the "inevitable" imperial fall;[142][143] Egyptology[144][145] and Japanology pose equal challenges. Carneiro explored the Bronze Age civilizations. Stuart J. Kaufman, Richard Little and William Wohlforth researched the next three millennia, comparing eight civilizations. They conclude: The "rigidity of the borders" contributed importantly to hegemony in every concerned case.[146] Hence, "when the system's borders are rigid, the probability of hegemony is high".[147] The circumscription theory was stressed in the comparative studies of the Roman and Chinese Empires. The circumscribed Chinese Empire recovered from all falls, while the fall of Rome, by contrast, was fatal. "What counteracted this [imperial] tendency in Europe ... was a countervailing tendency for the geographical boundaries of the system to expand." If "Europe had been a closed system, some great power would eventually have succeeded in establishing absolute supremacy over the other states in the region".[148] The ancient Chinese system was relatively enclosed, whereas the European system began to expand its reach to the rest of the world from the onset of system formation… In addition, overseas provided outlet for territorial competition, thereby allowing international competition on the European continent to ... trump the ongoing pressure toward convergence.[149] His 1945 book on the four centuries of the European power struggle, Ludwig Dehio titled The Precarious Balance. He explained the durability of the European states system by its overseas expansion: "Overseas expansion and the system of states were born at the same time; the vitality that burst the bounds of the Western world also destroyed its unity."[150] Edward Carr causally linked the end of the overseas outlet for imperial expansion and World Wars. In the nineteenth century, he wrote during the Second World War, imperialist wars were waged against "primitive" peoples. "It was silly for European countries to fight against one another when they could still ... maintain social cohesion by continuous expansion in Asia and Africa. Since 1900, however, this has no longer been possible: "the situation has radically changed". Now wars are between "imperial powers."[151] Hans Morgenthau wrote that the very imperial expansion into relatively empty geographical spaces in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth centuries, in Africa, Eurasia, and western North America, deflected great power politics into the periphery of the earth, thereby reducing conflict. For example, the more attention Russia, France and the United States paid to expanding into far-flung territories in imperial fashion, the less attention they paid to one another, and the more peaceful, in a sense, the world was. But by the late nineteenth century, the consolidation of the great nation-states and empires of the West was consummated, and territorial gains could only be made at the expense of one another.[152] John H. Herz outlined one "chief function" of the overseas expansion and the impact of its end: [A] European balance of power could be maintained or adjusted because it was relatively easy to divert European conflicts into overseas directions and adjust them there. Thus the openness of the world contributed to the consolidation of the territorial system. The end of the 'world frontier' and the resulting closedness of an interdependent world inevitably affected the system's effectiveness.[153] Some later commentators[who?] drew similar conclusions: For some commentators, the passing of the Nineteenth century seemed destined to mark the end of this long era of European empire building. The unexplored and unclaimed "blank" spaces on the world map were rapidly diminishing ... and the sense of "global closure" prompted an anxious fin-de-siècle debate about the future of the great empires ... The "closure" of the global imperial system implied ... the beginning of a new era of intensifying inter-imperial struggle along borders that now straddled the globe.[154] The opportunity for any system to expand in size seems almost a necessary condition for it to remain balanced, at least over the long haul. Far from being impossible or exceedingly improbable, systemic hegemony is likely under two conditions: "when the boundaries of the international system remain stable and no new major powers emerge from outside the system."[155] With the system becoming global, further expansion is precluded. The geopolitical condition of "global closure"[156] will remain to the end of history. Since "the contemporary international system is global, we can rule out the possibility that geographic expansion of the system will contribute to the emergence of a new balance of power, as it did so many times in the past."[157] As Quincy Wright had put it, "this process can no longer continue without interplanetary wars."[158] One of leading experts on world-system theory, Christopher Chase-Dunn, noted that the circumscription theory is applicable for the global system, since the global system is circumscribed.[159][160] In fact, within less than a century of its circumscribed existence the global system overcame the centuries-old balance of power and reached the unipolarity. Given "constant spatial parameters" of the global system, its unipolar structure is neither historically unusual nor theoretically surprising.[161] Randall Schweller theorized that a "closed international system", such as the global became a century ago, would reach "entropy" in a kind of thermodynamic law. Once the state of entropy is reached, there is no going back. The initial conditions are lost forever. Stressing the curiosity of the fact, Schweller writes that since the moment the modern world became a closed system, the process has worked in only one direction: from many poles to two poles to one pole. Thus unipolarity might represent the entropy—stable and permanent loss of variation—in the global system.[162] Present[edit] Main article: American empire See also: Pax Americana Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar Chalmers Johnson argues that the US globe-girding network of hundreds of military bases already represents a global empire in its initial form: For a major power, prosecution of any war that is not a defense of the homeland usually requires overseas military bases for strategic reasons. After the war is over, it is tempting for the victor to retain such bases and easy to find reasons to do so. Commonly, preparedness for a possible resumption of hostilities will be invoked. Over time, if a nation’s aims become imperial, the bases form the skeleton of an empire.[163] Simon Dalby associates the network of bases with the Roman imperial system: Looking at these impressive facilities which reproduce substantial parts of American suburbia complete with movie theatres and restaurant chains, the parallels with Roman garrison towns built on the Rhine, or on Hadrian’s wall in England, where the remains are strikingly visible on the landscape, are obvious … Less visible is the sheer scale of the logistics to keep garrison troops in residence in the far-flung reaches of empire ... That [military] presence literally builds the cultural logic of the garrison troops into the landscape, a permanent reminder of imperial control.[164] Kenneth Pomeranz and Harvard Historian Niall Ferguson share the above-cited views: "With American military bases in over 120 countries, we have hardly seen the end of empire.” This “vast archipelago of US military bases … far exceeds 19th-century British ambitions. Britain’s imperium consisted of specific, albeit numerous, colonies and clients; the American imperial vision is much more global…”[165] Conventional maps of US military deployments understate the extent of America's military reach. A Defense Department map of the world, which shows the areas of responsibility of the five major regional commands, suggests that America's sphere of military influence is now literally global … The regional combatant commanders—the 'pro-consuls' of this imperium—have responsibility for swaths of territory beyond the wildest imaginings of their Roman predecessors.[166] Another Harvard Historian Charles S. Maier opens his Among Empires: American Ascendancy and Its Predecessors with these words: "What a substratum for empire! Compared with which, the foundation of the Macedonian, the Roman and the British, sink into insignificance."[167] One of the most accepted distinctions between earlier empires and the American Empire is the latter's “global” or “planetary” scope.[168] French former Foreign Minister Hubert Vedrine wondered: "The situation is unprecedented: What previous empire subjugated the entire world...?"[169] The quests for universal empire are old but the present quest outdoes the previous in "the notable respect of being the first to actually be global in its reach."[170] For Historian Eric Hobsbawm, a "key novelty of the US imperial project is that all other great powers and empires knew that they were not the only ones..."[171] Another Historian Paul Kennedy, who made his name in the 1980s with his prediction of the imminent US “imperial overstretch,” in 2002 acknowledged about the present world system: Nothing has ever existed like this disparity of power. The Pax Britannica was run on the cheap. Napoleon’s France and Philip II’s Spain had powerful foes and were part of a multipolar system. Charlemagne’s empire was merely western European in stretch. The Roman Empire stretched further afield, but there was another great empire in Persia and a larger one in China. There is … no comparison.[172] Walter Russell Mead observes that the United States attempts to repeate “globally” what the ancient empires of Egypt, China and Rome had each accomplished on a regional basis.[173] Professor Emeritus of Sociology at the University of Leeds, Zygmunt Bauman, concludes that due to its planetary dimension, the new empire cannot be drawn on a map: The new ‘empire’ is not an entity that could be drawn on a map… Drawing a map of the empire would also be a pointless exercise because the most conspicuously ‘imperial’ trait of the new empire’s mode of being consists in viewing and treating the whole of the planet … as a potential grazing ground…[174] Times Atlas of Empires numbers 70 empires in the world history. Niall Ferguson lists numerous parallels between them and the United States. He concludes: “To those who would still insist on American exceptionalism, the historian of empires can only retort: as exceptional as all the other 69 empires.”[175] Fareed Zakaria stressed one element not exceptional for the American Empire—the concept of exceptionalism. All dominant empires thought they were special.[176] Future[edit] In 1945, Historian Ludwig Dehio predicted global unification due to the circumscription of the global system, although he did not use this term. Being global, the system can neither expand nor be subject to external intrusion as the European states system had been for centuries: In all previous struggles for supremacy, attempts to unite the European peninsula in a single state have been condemned to failure primarily through the intrusion of new forces from outside the old Occident. The Occident was an open area. But the globe was not, and, for that very reason, ultimately destined to be unified… And this very process [of unification] was clearly reflected in both World Wars.[177] Fifteen years later, Dehio confirmed his hypothesis: The European system owed its durability to its overseas outlet. “But how can a multiple grouping of world states conceivably be supported from outside in the framework of a finite globe?”[178] During the same time, Quincy Wright developed a similar concept. Balance-of-power politics has aimed less at preserving peace than at preserving the independence of states and preventing the development of world empire. In the course of history, the balance of power repeatedly reemerged, but on ever-wider scale. Eventually, the scale became global. Unless we proceed to “interplanetary wars,” this pattern can no longer continue. In spite of significant reversals, the “trend towards world unity” can “scarcely be denied.” World unity appears to be “the limit toward which the process of world history seems to tend.”[179] Five scholars—Hornell Hart,[180] Raoul Naroll,[181] Louis Morano,[182] Rein Taagepera[183] and the author of the circumscription theory Robert Carneiro[184][185]—researched expanding imperial cycles. They worked with historical atlases but the advent of YouTube provided us with a better visualization.[113][114] They reached the same conclusion—that a world empire is pre-determined—and attempted to estimate the time of its appearance. Naroll and Carneiro found that this time is close at hand: around the year 2200 and 2300 respectively. The founder of the Paneuropean Union, Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi, writing yet in 1943, drew a more specific and immediate future imperial project: After the War America is bound “to take over the command of the skies.” The danger of “the utter annihilation of all enemy towns and lands” can “only be prevented by the air superiority of a single power … America’s air role is the only alternative to intercontinental wars.” Despite his outstanding anti-imperialism, Coudenhove-Kalergi detailed: No imperialism, but technical and strategic problems of security urge America to rule the skies of the globe, just as Britain during the last century ruled the seas of the world… Pacifists and anti-imperialists will be shocked by this logic. They will try to find an escape. But they will try in vain… At the end of the war the crushing superiority of American plane production will be an established fact… The solution of the problem … is by no means ideal, nor even satisfactory. But it is the minor evil…[186] Coudenhove-Kalergi envisaged a kind of Pax Americana modeled on “Pax Romana”: During the third century BC the Mediterranean world was divided on five great powers—Roma and Carthage, Macedonia, Syria, and Egypt. The balance of power led to a series of wars until Rome emerged the queen of the Mediterranean and established an incomparable era of two centuries of peace and progress, the ‘Pax Romana’… It may be that America’s air power could again assure our world, now much smaller than the Mediterranean at that period, two hundred years of peace…[187] This period would be necessary transitory stage before World State is eventually established, though he did not specify how the last transformation is expected to occur. Coudenhove-Kalergi's follower in the teleological theory of World State, Toynbee, supposed the traditional way of universal conquest and emphasized that the world is ripe for conquest: "…Hitler's eventual failure to impose peace on the world by the force of arms was due, not to any flaw in his thesis that the world was ripe for conquest, but to an accidental combination of incidental errors in his measures…" But "in falling by so narrow a margin to win the prize of world-dominion for himself, Hitler had left the prize dangling within the reach of any successor capable of pursuing the same aims of world-conquest with a little more patience, prudence, and tact." With his "revolution of destruction," Hitler has performed the "yeoman service" for "some future architect of a Pax Ecumenica... For a post-Hitlerian empire-builder, Hitler's derelict legacy was a gift of the Gods."[188] The next “architect of a Pax Ecumenica,” known more commonly as Pax Americana, demonstrated “more patience, prudence, and tact.” Consequently, as President Dwight Eisenhower put it, the NATO allies became “almost psychopathic” whenever anyone talked about a US withdrawal, and the reception of his successor John F. Kennedy in Berlin was “almost hysterical,” as Chancellor Conrad Adenauer characterized it .[189] John Ikenberry finds that the Europeans wanted a stronger, more formal and more imperial system than the United States was initially willing to provide. In the end the United States settled for this “form of empire—a Pax Americana with formal commitments to Europe.”[190] According to a much debated thesis, the United States became “empire by invitation.”[191] The period discussed in the thesis (1945–1952) ended precisely the year Toynbee theorized on "some future architect of a Pax Ecumenica.” Dissociating America from Rome, Eisenhower gave a pessimistic forecast. In 1951, before he became President, he had written on West Europe: “We cannot be a modern Rome guarding the far frontiers with our legions if for no other reason than that these are not, politically, our frontiers. What we must do is to assist these [West European] peoples.” Two years later, he wrote: When it was decided to deploy US divisions to Europe, no one had “for an instant” thought that they would remain there for “several decades”—that the United States could “build a sort of Roman Wall with its own troops and so protect the world.”[192] Eisenhower assured Soviet Chairman Nikita Khrushchev on Berlin in 1959: “Clearly we did not contemplate 50 years in occupation there.” It lasted, remarks Marc Trachtenberg, from July 1945 to September 1994, 10 months short of 50 years.[193] Notably, when the US troops eventually left, they left eastward. Confirming the theory of the “empire by invitation,” with their first opportunity East European states extended the “invitation.”[194] Chalmers Johnson regards the global military reach of the United States as empire in its “initial” form.[195] Dimitri Simes finds that most of the world sees the United States as a "nascent" imperial power.[196] Some scholars concerned how this empire would look in its ultimate form. The ultimate form of empire was described by Michael Doyle in his Empires. It is empire in which its two main components—the ruling core and the ruled periphery—merged to form one integrated whole. At this stage the empire as defined ceases to exist and becomes world state. Doyle examplifies the transformation on the case of the Roman Emperor Caracalla whose legislation in AD 212 extended the Roman citizenship to all inhabitants of the Mediterranean world.[197] International Relations scholar Alexander Wendt in his 2003 article “Why the World State is Inevitable…” supposed the pathway of universal conquest and subsequent consolidation provided the conquering power recognizes all conquered members.[198] Replying on criticism, Wendt invoked the example of the Roman Empire: A "world empire would be an unstable equilibrium, still subject to the struggle for recognition." However, conquest can "produce a proper ‘state’ if, as a result of internal reform, the world empire eventually recognizes all of its members (like the Roman Empire did, for example).”[199] Doyle's case of the Roman Empire had also been evoked by Susan Strange in her 1988 article, "The Future of the American Empire." Strange emphasized that the most persistent empires were those which best managed to integrate the ruling core and the peripheral allies. The article is partly a reply on the published a year earlier bestseller The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers which predicted imminent US "imperial overstretch." Strange found this outcome unlikely, stressing the fact that the peripheral allies have been successfully recruited into the American Empire.[200] Envisaging a world empire of either the United States or the Soviet Union (whoever is victorious in World War III), Bertrand Russell projected the Roman scenario too: "Like the Romans, they will, in the course of time, extend citizenship to the vanquished. There will then be a true world state, and it will be possible to forget that it will have owed its origin to conquest."[201] To the case of Caracalla, Toynbee added the Abbasid cosmopolitan reformation of 750 AD. Both "were good auguries for the prospect that, in a post-Modern chapter of Western history, a supranational commonwealth originally based on the hegemony of a paramount power over its satellites might eventually be put on the sounder basis of a constitutional partnership in which all the people of all the partner states would have their fare share in the conduct of common affairs.”[202] Historian Maks Ostrovski finds above mentioned cosmopolitan reformations to be the characteristic fate of persistent empires. When such a reformation occurs in our world, he writes, the green card would be abolished since all earth inhabitants would have it by birth. This cosmopolitan World State, as the records of earlier circumscribed civilizations suggest, will last millennia.[203] See also[edit] Colonialism Comparative studies of the Roman and Han empires Democratic empire Empire-building Hegemony Historical powers Imperialism Linguistic imperialism Military globalization Nomadic empire Soviet Empire World state Lists: List of empires List of largest empires List of extinct countries, empires, etc. List of countries spanning more than one continent List of Hindu Empires and Dynasties References[edit] Citations ^ "Empire". Oxford Dictionary Online. Retrieved 21 October 2014. ^ a b c d e f g h Howe 2002. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFHowe2002 (help) ^ Ross Hassig, Mexico and the Spanish Conquest (1994), pp. 23–24, ISBN 0-582-06829-0 (pbk) ^ "Oxford Dictionary Online". Retrieved 2020-06-30. "An extensive territory under the control of a supreme ruler (typically an emperor) or an oligarchy, often consisting of an aggregate of many separate states or territories. In later use also: an extensive group of subject territories ultimately under the rule of a single sovereign state." ^ Howe, Stephen (2002). Empire. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 15. ISBN 978-0-19-280223-1. ^ Doyle, Michael (5 September 2018). Empires. Cornell University Press. p. 30. ISBN 978-1-5017-3413-7. I favor the behavioral definition of empire as effective control, whether formal or informal, of a subordinated society by an imperial society. ^ James, Paul; Nairn, Tom (2006). Globalization and Violence, Vol. 1: Globalizing Empires, Old and New. London: Sage Publications. p. xxiii. ^ Taagepera, Rein (1979). "Size and Duration of Empires: Growth-Decline Curves, 600 B.C. to 600 A.D.". Social Science History. 3 (3/4): 117. doi:10.2307/1170959. JSTOR 1170959. ^ Howe 2002, p. 35. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFHowe2002 (help) ^ Howe 2002, p. 66. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFHowe2002 (help) ^ "empire". The Free Dictionary. Retrieved 26 October 2018. any monarchy that for reasons of history, prestige, etc, has an emperor rather than a king as head of state ^ "empire". Your Dictionary. LoveToKnow, Corp. 2018. Retrieved 26 October 2018. government by an emperor or empress ^ "empire". Vocabulary.com Dictionary. Retrieved 26 October 2018. a monarchy with an emperor as head of state ^ "empire". Collins English Dictionary. 2018. Retrieved 26 October 2018. government by an emperor or empress ^ Jane Burbank and Frederick Cooper, Empires in world history: Power and the politics of difference (Princeton UP, 2010). ^ Stephen Howe, Empire: A very short introduction (Oxford UP, 2002) pp. 126-127. ^ Stearns, ed. The Encyclopedia of World History (2001) ^ Samuel N. Eisenstadt, Axial Age Civilizations, (New York: New York State University Press, 1986) ^ Friedrich Ratzel, "Territorial Growth of States", Human Geography: An Essential Anthology, (eds. Agnew, John, & Livingstone, David & Rogers, Alisdair, Oxford: Blackwell, 1997), p 527; and "The Laws of the Spatial Growth of States", The Structure of Political Geography, (eds. Kasperson, Roger E., & Minghi, Julian V., Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company, 1969), p 18. ^ Namita Sanjay Sugandhi (2008). Between the Patterns of History: Rethinking Mauryan Imperial Interaction in the Southern Deccan. pp. 88–89. ISBN 978-0-549-74441-2. Retrieved 2012-06-06. ^ Stearns, ed. The Encyclopedia of World History (2001) ^ Stearns, ed. The Encyclopedia of World History (2001) ^ Michael Burger (2008). The Shaping of Western Civilization: From Antiquity to the Enlightenment. University of Toronto Press. p. 115. ISBN 9781551114323. ^ Ken Pennington. "France – Legal History". Columbus School of Law and School of Canon Law, The Catholic University of America. Archived from the original on September 29, 2013. Retrieved September 23, 2013. ^ Cynthia Haven (February 19, 2010). "Stanford scholar links Rome and America in Philadelphia exhibition". Stanford Report. ^ Stearns, ed. The Encyclopedia of World History (2001) ^ "Ancient Japan". Ancient History Encyclopedia. Retrieved 2018-07-31. ^ "Ancient Japanese & Chinese Relations". Ancient History Encyclopedia. Retrieved 2018-07-31. ^ "Ancient Korean & Chinese Relations". Ancient History Encyclopedia. Retrieved 2018-07-31. ^ Bulliet & Crossley & Headrick & Hirsch & Johnson 2014, p. 264. ^ Lockard, Craig (1999). "Tang Civilization and the Chinese Centuries" (PDF). Encarta Historical Essays. ^ Stearns, ed. The Encyclopedia of World History (2001) ^ Stearns, ed. The Encyclopedia of World History (2001) ^ Luling, Virginia (2002). Somali Sultanate: the Geledi city-state over 150 years. Transaction Publishers. p. 17. ISBN 978-1-874209-98-0. ^ Luc Cambrézy, Populations réfugiées: de l'exil au retour, p.316 ^ Mukhtar, Mohamed Haji (1989). "The Emergence and Role of Political Parties in the Inter-River Region of Somalia from 1947–1960". Ufahamu. 17 (2): 98. ^ Shelley, Fred M. (2013). Nation Shapes: The Story behind the World's Borders. ABC-CLIO. p. 358. ISBN 978-1-61069-106-2. ^ Dvornik, Francis (1956). The Slavs: Their Early History and Civilization. Boston: American Academy of Arts and Sciences. p. 179. The Psalter and the Book of Prophets were adapted or "modernized" with special regard to their use in Bulgarian churches, and it was in this school that glagolitic writing was replaced by the so-called Cyrillic writing, which was more akin to the Greek uncial, which simplified matters considerably and is still used by the Orthodox Slavs. ^ Florin Curta (2006). Southeastern Europe in the Middle Ages, 500–1250. Cambridge Medieval Textbooks. Cambridge University Press. pp. 221–222. ISBN 978-0-521-81539-0. Cyrillic preslav. ^ J. M. Hussey, Andrew Louth (2010). "The Orthodox Church in the Byzantine Empire". Oxford History of the Christian Church. Oxford University Press. p. 100. ISBN 978-0-19-161488-0. ^ Voltaire, Wikiquote, citing Essai sur l'histoire generale et sur les moeurs et l'espirit des nations, Chapter 70 (1756), retrieved 2008-01-06 ^ a b c d e Howe 2002, p. 46. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFHowe2002 (help) ^ Howe 2002, p. 30. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFHowe2002 (help) ^ Howe 2002, p. 47. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFHowe2002 (help) ^ Gregory G. Guzman, "Were the barbarians a negative or positive factor in ancient and medieval history?", The Historian 50 (1988), 568–570 ^ Thomas T. Allsen, Culture and conquest in Mongol Eurasia, 211 ^ Khan 2005, p. 54. sfn error: no target: CITEREFKhan2005 (help) ^ Jackson, Roy (2010). Mawlana Mawdudi and Political Islam: Authority and the Islamic State. Routledge. ISBN 9781136950360. ^ Chapra, Muhammad Umer (2014). Morality and Justice in Islamic Economics and Finance. Edward Elgar Publishing. pp. 62–63. ISBN 9781783475728. ^ Parthasarathi, Prasannan (2011), Why Europe Grew Rich and Asia Did Not: Global Economic Divergence, 1600–1850, Cambridge University Press, pp. 39–45, ISBN 978-1-139-49889-0 ^ Maddison, Angus (2003): Development Centre Studies The World Economy Historical Statistics: Historical Statistics, OECD Publishing, ISBN 9264104143, pages 259–261 ^ Lawrence E. Harrison, Peter L. Berger (2006). Developing cultures: case studies. Routledge. p. 158. ISBN 9780415952798. ^ "An Outline of the History of Persia During the Last Two Centuries (A.D. 1722–1922)". Edward G. Browne. London: Packard Humanities Institute. p. 33. Retrieved 2010-09-24. ^ Goldfarb, Michael (18 March 2007). "Napoleon, the Jews and French Muslims". The New York Times. ^ "Voltaire, Rousseau and Napoleon on Prophet Muhammad ﷺ". 25 June 2015. ^ "Bonaparte and Islam · Liberty, Equality, Fraternity". Archived from the original on 2019-05-28. Retrieved 2019-05-31. ^ Murshidabad.net (8 May 2012). "Hassan Ali Mirza's succession". Archived from the original on 2 August 2012. Retrieved 10 August 2012. ^ Ian Copland; Ian Mabbett; Asim Roy; et al. (2012). A History of State and Religion in India. Routledge. p. 161. ^ Thomson, Basil (January 1901). "Note Upon the Natives of Savage Island, or Niue". The Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland. 31: 137–145. doi:10.2307/2842790. JSTOR 2842790. ^ [1] Conquerors: How Portugal Forged the First Global Empire, Author: Roger Crowley, Publisher: Random House; 1st edition, year: 2015 ^ Wilbur, Marguerite Eyer; Company, The East India. The East India Company: And the British Empire in the Far East. Stanford University Press. pp. 175–178. ISBN 9780804728645. Retrieved 16 February 2014. ^ Johnston, Steve, Tea Party Culture War: A Clash of Worldviews, p90, "By 1922, the British Empire presided over 458 million people—one-quarter of the world's population—and comprised more than 13 million square miles." ^ Watts, Carl P. "Pax Britannica": 3. it left many legacies, including widespread use of the English language, belief in Protestant religion, economic globalization, modern precepts of law and order, and representative democracy. Cite journal requires |journal= (help) ^ Winks, Robin W. (1993). World civilization : a brief history (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Collegiate Press. p. 406. ISBN 9780939693283. By 1914 common law, trail by jury, the King James Authorized Version of the Bible, the English language, and the British navy had been spread around the globe. ^ Pagadi, Setumadhavarao R. (1983). Shivaji. National Book Trust, India. p. 21. ISBN 978-81-237-0647-4. ^ Lens & Zinn 2003. ^ Malesevic, Sinisa (2013). Nation-states and nationalisms organization, ideology and solidarity. Polity Press. ISBN 9780745672069. ^ Sebastian Huhnholz, "Do All Roads Lead to Rome? Ancient Implications and Modern Transformations in the Recent US Discourse on an American Empire", Mediterraneo Antico, 13/1-2, (2010): p. 55. ^ Dimitri K. Simes, "America's Imperial Dilemma", Foreign Affairs, 82/6, (2003): p 93. ^ In Clyde V. Prestowitz's version it also "quacks" like a duck. Rogue Nation: American Unilateralism and the Failure of Good Intentions, (New York: Basic Books, 2004: p 25). ^ Kumar, Krishan (2010). "Nation-states as empires, empires as nation-states: two principles, one practice?". Theory and Society. 39 (2): 119–143. doi:10.1007/s11186-009-9102-8. S2CID 144559989. ^ Immerwahr, Daniel (2019). How to Hide and Empire: A History of the Greater United States. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. ^ Debrix, Francois; Lacy, Mark, eds. (2009). The Geopolitics of American Insecurity: Terror, Power and Foreign Policy. Routledge. pp. 129–141. ISBN 978-1134045402. ^ Cohen 2004, p. 56. ^ Piganiol, André (1950). "The Causes of the Fall of the Roman Empire". The Journal of General Education. 5 (1): 62–69. JSTOR 27795332. ^ Bury, John (2011). History of the Later Roman Empire. New York: Dover Publications. ISBN 978-0486203980. ^ Heather, Peter (2007). The Fall of the Roman Empire: A New History of Rome and the Barbarians. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0195325416. ^ George Hicks, Japan's hidden apartheid: the Korean Minority and the Japanese, (Aldershot, England; Brookfield, VT: Ashgate, 1998), 3. ^ a b "America's Invisible Empire". Economic and Political Weekly. 39 (44). 30 October 2004. Text available here Archived 2017-01-27 at the Wayback Machine, author link here. ^ Johnson, Chalmers, Blowback: The Costs and Consequences of American Empire (2000), pp. 72–79 ^ Niall Ferguson. "Colossus: The Rise and Fall of the American Empire". ^ Lens & Zinn 2003, p. 63-64. ^ LaFeber, Walter, Inevitable Revolutions: The United States in Central America (1993) 2nd edition, p. 19 ^ Boot, Max (May 6, 2003). "American Imperialism? No Need to Run Away from Label". Council on Foreign Relations op-ed, quoting USA Today. Archived from the original on January 23, 2009. Retrieved 2008-01-06. ^ Lens & Zinn 2003, p. Back cover. ^ Ian Black (December 20, 2002). "Living in a euro wonderland". Guardian. Retrieved 2008-01-06. ^ "EU gets its military fist". BBC News. December 13, 2002. Retrieved 2008-01-06. ^ Nikolaos Tzifakis (April 2007). "EU's region-building and boundary-drawing policies: the European approach to the Southern Mediterranean and the Western Balkans 1". Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans. informaworld. 9 (1): 47–64. doi:10.1080/14613190701217001. S2CID 154857668. ^ Stephen R. Hurt (2003). "Co-operation and coercion? The Cotonou Agreement between the European Union and acp states and the end of the Lomé Convention" (PDF). Third World Quarterly. informaworld. 24: 161–176. doi:10.1080/713701373. S2CID 153354532. Retrieved 2007-01-06. ^ Bruno Coppieters, Michael Emerson, Michel Huysseune, Tamara Kovziridze, Nathalie Tocci, Gergana Noutcheva and Marius Vahl. "Europeanisation and Conflict Resolution: Case Studies from the European Periphery" (PDF). Belgian Science Policy. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-12-02. Retrieved 2008-01-06.CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link) ^ Jan Zielonka (2006). Europe as Empire: The Nature of the Enlarged European Union (PDF). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-929221-9. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-12-02. Retrieved 2008-01-06. ^ For the Okur's thesis about "nation empires", look at the article: Mehmet Akif Okur, "Rethinking Empire After 9/11: Towards A New Ontological Image of World Order" Perceptions, Journal of International Affairs, Volume XII, Winter 2007, pp. 61–93 ^ Peter Stearns, ed. The Encyclopedia of World History: Ancient, Medieval, and Modern, Chronologically Arranged (6th ed. 2001), passim. ^ John Glubb, The fate of empires and Search for survival (William Blackwood & Sons, 1976). ^ See video ^ Jane Burbank and Frederick Cooper, Empires in World History: Power and the Politics of Difference, (Princeton & Oxford, Princeton University Press, 2010, p 8. ^ Niall Ferguson, "The Unconscious Colossus: Limits of (Alternatives to) American Empire", Daedalus, 134/2, (2005): p 24. ^ Yale H. Ferguson & Richard W. Mansbach, "Superpower, Hegemony, Empire," San Diego: Annual Meeting paper, The International Studies Association, March 22–26, (2006: 9), http://citation.allacademic.com//meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/0/9/9/0/5/pages99056/p99056-9.php Archived 2016-11-24 at the Wayback Machine ^ Daniel Deudney & G. John Ikenberry, "America's Impact: The End of Empire and the Globalization of the Westphalian System", working paper, Princeton University, 2015, pp. 7–8, http://www.scholar.princeton.edu/sites/.../am-impact-dd-gji-final-1-august-2015.pdf[permanent dead link] ^ Anthony Pagden, "Imperialism, Liberalism & the Quest for Perpetual Peace", Daedalus, 134/2, (2005): p. 47. ^ Cohen 2004, p. 50. ^ Jane Burbank & Frederick Cooper, Empires in World History: Power and the Politics of Difference, (Princeton & Oxford, Princeton University Press, 2010, pp. 2–3. ^ The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, London: Macmillan, 1977, p. 21). ^ Gilpin War and Change in World Politics, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981, pp. 110–116). ^ Empires, (London: Cornell University Press, 1986, pp. 12, 51, 137). ^ Quincy Wright, “On the Application of Intelligence to World Affairs", Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 4/8, (August 1, 1948): p. 250, https://books.google.com/books?id=3A0AAAAAMBAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=en&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false ^ Friedrich Tenbruck, "Internal History of Society or Universal History?" tr. J. Bleicher, Theory, Culture, Society, 11, (1994): p. 87. ^ William Wohlforth, & Stuart J. Kaufman, & Richard Little, Balance of Power in World History, (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007). ^ "Foreword", Royal Commentaries of the Incas and General History of Peru, (Garcilaso de la Vega, Austin & London: University of Texas Press, 1966, pp. X–XI). ^ System of States, (Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1977, pp. 43–44). ^ Fichte, (1806). "Characterisitics of the Present Age", Theory and Practice of the Balance of Power, 1486–1914: Selected European Writings, (ed. Moorhead Wright, London: Rowman & Littlefield, 1975, pp. 87–89). ^ Cosmos: a sketch of a physical description of the universe by Alexander von Humboldt; translated from German by E. C. Otté (vol I, p. 359). ^ a b "50 Centuries in 10 Minutes", (2014) ^ a b "History of the World: Every Year", (2015) ^ Fredrick Jackson Turner, The Frontier in American History, Holt, Rinchart and Winston, New York, 1920. ^ Halford J. Mackinder, The Geographical Pivot of History, J. Murray, London, 1904. ^ Fridriech Ratzel, "The Laws of the Spatial Growth of States", The Structure of Political Geography, (eds. Kasperson, Roger E., & Minghi, Julian V., Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company, 1969), p 28. ^ Cited in Robert Strausz-Hupé, Geopolitics: The Struggle for Space and Power, (New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1942), p 30-31. ^ K'ang Yu-wei, The One World Philosophy, (tr. Thompson, Lawrence G., London, 1958), pp. 79–80, 85. ^ George Vacher de Lapouge, L'Aryen: Son Rôle Social, (Nantes: 1899), chapter "L'Avenir des Aryens". ^ Derwent Whittlesey, German Strategy of World Conquest, (New York: Farrar & Rinehart, 1942), p 74. ^ Robert Strausz-Hupé, Geopolitics: The Struggle for Space and Power, (New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1942), p XI. ^ John H. Herz, "Power Politics and World Organization,"' The American Political Science Review, 36/6, (1942): p 1041. ^ Ludwig Dehio, The Precarious Balance: Four Centuries of the European Power Struggle, 1945, (tr. Fullman, Charles, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1962), pp. 266–267. ^ "Atomic War or Peace", 1945, Albert Einstein Collection: Essays in Humanism, (New York: Philosophical Library/Open Road, 2016, https://books.google.com/books/about/Essays_in_Humanism.html?id=6NoFIRmg3J4C&redir_esc=y ^ "Atomic Weapon and the Prevention of War", Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 2/7-8, October 1: p. 20, https://books.google.com/books?id=WwwAAAAAMBAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false ^ "The Illusion of World Government", Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 5/10: (October 1, 1949): p. 291, https://books.google.com/books?id=mA0AAAAAMBAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=en&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false ^ Георгий П. Федотов, (1945). “Новое Отечество,” Новый Град, Нью Йорк: Издательство Чехова, 1952, p 98, 102, 107. ^ John Bellamy Foster, "The New Geopolitics of Empire", The Monthly Review, 57/8, (2006): p 7, http://monthlyreview.org/2006/01/01/the-new-geopolitics-of-empire Archived 2018-09-29 at the Wayback Machine ^ James Burnham, Struggle for the World, (New York: The John Day Company, 1947), pp. 33, 50, 53, 55; 134–135, 143. ^ In Defense of the National Interest: A Critical Examination of American Foreign Policy, (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1951), p 58. ^ A Study of History, (London: Oxford University Press, 1954), vol. IX, p. 524. ^ Max Gschwind, "Massive Retaliatory Power", map, Fortune, 51, May 1954: p. 105, https://www.fulltable.com/vts/f/fortune/xf/34.jpg Archived 2017-03-12 at the Wayback Machine ^ Michio Kaku, & Daniel Axelrod, To Win a Nuclear War: The Pentagon Secret War Plans, (Boston: South End Press, 1987), p. 195. ^ The Rise of the West: A History of the Human Community, (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1963), p. 807. ^ Emphasis added, cited in Fred Kaplan, The Wizards of Armageddon. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 1991, pp. 222–223. ^ Robert Carneiro, "The Circumscription Theory: Challenge and Response", American Behavioral Scientist, 31/4, (1988): p 499. ^ O’Connor, D. B. & Silverman, D. P., Ancient Egyptian Kingship, (Leiden & New York: E. J. Brill, 1995), p XXI. ^ Amelie Kuhrt, The Ancient Near East circa 3000–330 BC, (London & New York: Routledge, 1995), vol. I, pp. 123–124. ^ Yuri Pines, Envisioning Eternal Empire: Chinese Political Thought of the Warring States Era, (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2009), pp. 8–9. ^ Friedrich Tenbruck, "Internal History of Society or Universal History?" tr. J. Bleicher, Theory, Culture, Society, 11, (1994): pp. 84, 86–87. ^ Yuri Pines, Envisioning Eternal Empire: Chinese Political Thought of the Warring States Era, (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2009). ^ Yuri Pines, The Everlasting Empire: The Political Culture of Ancient China and Its Imperial Legacy, (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2012). ^ D. B. O'Connor & D. P. Silverman, Ancient Egyptian Kingship, (Leiden & New York: E. J. Brill, 1995). ^ Aidan Dodson, Monarchs of the Nile, (London: The Rubicon Press, 1995). ^ Kaufman & Little & Wohlforth, The Balance of Power in World History, (London: Palgrave, 2007), p. 237. ^ Kaufman & Little & Wohlforth, "Testing Balance-of-Power Theory in World History", European Journal of International Relations, 13/2, (2007): p. 178. ^ Stuart J. Kaufman & William C. Wohlforth & Richard Little, The Balance of Power in World History, (London: Palgrave, 2007), pp. 45–46. ^ Victoria Tin-bor Hui, War and State Formation in China and Early Modern Europe, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2005, p. 141. ^ (tr. Fullman, Charles, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1962), pp. 50, 90, 279. ^ Conditions of Peace, (London: Macmillan, 1943), p 113-114. ^ Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 1948, (New York: McGraw Hill, revised 2006 edition), p 354–357. ^ John H. Herz, "Rise and Demise of the Territorial State", World Politics, 9, (1957): p. 482. ^ Michael Heffernan, "The Politics of the Map in the Early Twentieth Century", Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 29/3, (2002): p. 207. ^ Kaufman & Little & Wohlforth, The Balance of Power in World History, (London: Palgrave, 2007), p 229, 237; Idem., "Testing Balance-of-Power Theory in World History", European Journal of International Relations, 13/2, (2007): p 159. ^ Gerry Kearns, "Fin de Siècle Geopolitics: Mackinder, Hobson and Theories of Global Closure", Political Geography of the Twentieth Century: A Global Analysis, (ed. Peter J. Taylor, London: Belhaven Press, 1993). ^ Kaufman & Little & Wohlforth, The Balance of Power in World History, p 21. ^ Quincy Wright, A Study of War, (Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press, 1964), p 92-93. ^ "World State Formation: Historical Processes and Emergent Necessity", Political Geography Quarterly, 9/2, (1990): pp. 108–130; electronic source for the original working paper: http://irows.ucr.edu/papers/irows1.txt ^ Robert Carneiro, "Are We Circumscribed Now?" 2012 ^ Kaufman & Little & Wohlforth, "Testing Balance-of-Power Theory in World History", European Journal of International Relations, 13/2, (2007): p. 179. ^ Randall L. Schweller, "Entropy and the Trajectory of World Politics: Why Polarity Has Become Less Meaningful", Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 23/1, (2010): pp. 149–151. ^ The Sorrows of Empire: Militarism, Secrecy and the End of the Republic, New York: Henry Hobt and Company, (2004), p 187. ^ Simon Dalby, "Imperialism, Domination, Culture: The Continued Relevance of Critical Geopolitics," Geopolitics, 13/3, (2008): p 425. ^ Kenneth Pomeranz, "Empire & ‘Civilizing’ Missions, Past & Present, Daedalus, 134/2, (2005): p 43, 45. ^ Niall Ferguson, Colossus: The Rise and Fall of the American Empire, (New York: Penguin Books, 2005), p 17. ^ (Massachusetts & London: Harvard University Press, 2006), p 1. ^ Neil Smith, American Empire: Roosevelt's Geographer and the Prelude to Globalization, (Berkeley & Los Angeles & London: University of California Press, 2003), p XIII. ^ Hubert Vedrine & Dominique Moisi, France in an Age of Globalization, (tr. Gordon, Philip H., Washington: Brookings Institutions Press, 2001), p 2. ^ David C. Hendrickson, "The Curious Case of American Hegemony: Imperial Aspirations and National Decline," World Policy Journal, 22/2, (2005): p 5, http://bev.berkeley.edu/ipe/readings/American%20hegemony%202005.pdf ^ Eric Hobsbawm, "After Winning the War: The Empire Expands Wider and Still Wider," Counterpunch, (June 11, 2003, electronic source, no pagination), https://www.counterpunch.org/2003/06/10/the-empire-expands-wider-and-still-wider/ ^ “The Greatest Superpower Ever,” New Perspectives Quarterly, 19/2, (2002), http://www.digitalnpq.org/archive/2002_spring/kennedy.html ^ "America's Sticky Power," Foreign Policy, 141, (March – April 2004): p 48. ^ Europe: An Unfinished Adventure, (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2004), p 55-56. ^ "The Unconscious Colossus: Limits of (Alternatives to) American Empire," Daedalus, 134/2, (2005): p 20-21. ^ "The Arrogant Empire," Newsweek. (March 24, 2003), http://www.newsweek.com/arrogant-empire-132751 ^ Ludwig Dehio, The Precarious Balance: Four Centuries of the European Power Struggle, 1945, (tr. Fullman, Charles, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1962), p 234. ^ Ludwig Dehio, “Epilogue,” The Precarious Balance: Four Centuries of the European Power Struggle, 1960, (tr. Fullman, Charles, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1962), p 279. ^ Quincy Wright, A Study of War, (Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press, 1964), p 92-93, 228, 234. ^ "The Logistic Growth of Political Areas," Social Forces, 26, (1948): p 396-408. ^ "Imperial Cycles and World Order," Peace Research Society, 7, (1967): p 83-101. ^ "A Macrohistoric Trend towards World Government", Behavior Science Notes, 8, (1973): p 35-40. ^ “Expansion and Contraction Patterns of Large Polities: Context for Russia.” International Studies Quarterly, 41/3, (1997): 475–504. ^ "Political Expansion as an Expression of the Principle of Competitive Exclusion", Studying War: Anthropological Perspective, (eds. Reyna, Stephen P. & Dawns, Richard Erskine, Gordon and Breach, New Hampshire, 1994). ^ "The Political Unification of the World", Cross Cultural Survey, 38/2, (2004), p 162-177. ^ Crusade for Pan-Europe, (New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1943), p 297-298. ^ Crusade for Pan-Europe, p 299. ^ A Study of History, (London: Oxford University Press, 1954), vol IX, p 502. ^ Cited in Marc Trachtenberg, A Constructed Peace: The Making of the European Settlement, 1945–1963, (Princeton & New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1999), p 152-153, 394. ^ John G., Ikenberry, “Rethinking the Origins of American Hegemony,” Political Science Quarterly, 104/3, (1989): p 399. ^ Geir Lundestad, “Empire by Invitation? The United States and Western Europe, 1945–1952,” Journal of Peace Research, 23/3, (1986), p 263-267. ^ Cited in Constructed Peace, p 147-148. ^ A Constructed Peace, p 401. ^ Geir Lundestad, The United States and Western Europe since 1945: From 'Empire' by Invitation to Transatlantic Drift, (Oxford University Press, 2005), p 3. ^ The Sorrows of Empire: Militarism, Secrecy and the End of the Republic, (New York: Henry Hobt and Company, 2004), p 187. ^ "America's Imperial Dilemma," Foreign Affairs, 82/6, (2003): p 91. ^ Empires, (London: Cornell University Press, 1986, p 12). ^ "Why the World State is Inevitable: Teleology and the Logic of Anarchy," European Journal of International Relations, 9/4, (2003), http://www.comw.org/qdr/fulltext/03wendt.pdf, p 54-56. ^ Alexander Wendt, "Agency, Teleology and the World State: A Reply to Shannon," European Journal of International Relations, 11/4, (2005): p 595, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274287534_Agency_Teleology_and_the_World_State_A_Reply_to_Shannon. ^ Susan Strange, "The Future of the American Empire," Journal of International Affairs, 42/1,(1988): p 9, 11. ^ Bertrand Russell, "The Future of Man," Atlantic Monthly, (April (1951), electronic source, no pagination, https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1951/03/the-future-of-man/305193/ ^ A Study of History, (London: Oxford University Press, 1954), vol IX, p 554-555. ^ The Hyperbole of the World Order, (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2007), p 350, 367. Further reading[edit] Abernethy, David. The Dynamics of Global Dominance: European Empires 1414–1980. New Haven: Yale University Press 2000. Barkey, Karen. Empire of Difference: The Ottomans in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press 2008. Bowden, Brett (2009). The Empire of Civilization: The Evolution of an Imperial Idea. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-06814-5. Brown, Peter, "No Barbarians Needed" (review of Michael Kulikowski, The Tragedy of Empire: From Constantine to the Destruction of Roman Italy; Walter Scheidel, Escape from Rome: The Failure of Empire and the Road to Prosperity; Janet L. Nelson, King and Emperor: A New Life of Charlemagne), The New York Review of Books, vol. LXVII, no. 14 (24 September 2020, pp. 61–62. "Warlordism, not any great movement of peoples, was the political virus that brought down the Roman empire in the West. [...] 'In less than a generation, provinces [became] kingdoms.' [p. 61.] [Due to Europe's] state of perpetual war [amid] the persistent polycentrism made possible by the disappearance of Rome, [b]y the time of the Reformation the 'competitive fragmentation of power' ensured that Europe was studded with safety zones that protected beleaguered dissidents. [...] The best thing that Rome ever did for Europe was to die and not return." (p. 62.) Burbank, Jane and Frederick Cooper. Empires in World History: Power and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press 2010. ISBN 978-0-691-12708-8 Cohen, Eliot A. (July–August 2004). "History and the Hyperpower". Foreign Affairs. 83 (4): 49–63. doi:10.2307/20034046. JSTOR 20034046. Retrieved 26 December 2017. Colomer, Josep [2]The European Empire. Amazon Books, 2016. Colomer, Josep [3]Great Empires, Small Nations. The uncertain future of the sovereign state. London: Routledge, 2007. Cooper, Frederick. Colonialism in Question: Theory, Knowledge, History. Berkeley: University of California Press 1997. Darwin, John. After Tamerlane: The Global History of Empire since 1405. London: Bloomsbury Press 2008. Elliott, J.H. Empires of the Atlantic World: Britain and Spain in America, 1492–1830. New Haven: Yale University Press 2006. Findlay, Ronald and Kevin H. O'Rourke. Power and Plenty: Trade, Power, and the World Economy in the Second Millennium. Princeton: Princeton University Press 2007. Johan Galtung (January 1996). "The Decline and Fall of Empires: A Theory of De-Development". Honolulu. Archived from the original on 2007-10-13. Retrieved 2008-01-06. Written for the United Nations Research Institute on Development, UNRISD, Geneva. Geiss, Imanuel (1983). War and Empire in the Twentieth Century. Aberdeen University Press. ISBN 978-0-08-030387-1. Gilpin, Robert War and Change in World Politics pp. 110–116 Howe, Stephen (2002). Empire: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press. Innis, Harold (1950, rev. 1972). Empire and Communications. Rev. by Mary Q. Innis; foreword by Marshall McLuhan. Toronto, Ont.: University of Toronto Press. James, Paul; Nairn, Tom (2006). Globalization and Violence, Vol. 1: Globalizing Empires, Old and New. London: Sage Publications. Kamen, Henry. Empire: How Spain Became a World Power, 1492–1763. New York: HarperCollins 2003, Kennedy, Paul. The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000. New York: Random House 1987. Kumar, Krishan. Visions of empire: How five imperial regimes shaped the world (Princeton UP, 2019), examines the Roman, Ottoman, Habsburg, Russian, British and French empires. excerpts Lens, Sidney; Zinn, Howard (2003). The Forging of the American Empire: From the Revolution to Vietnam: A History of American Imperialism. Pluto Press. p. 464. ISBN 978-0-7453-2100-4. Pagden, Anthony. Peoples and Empires: A Short History of European Migration, Exploration, and Conquest from Greece to the Present. New York: Modern Library 2001. Subrahmanyam, Sanjay. The Portuguese Empire in Asia, 1500–1700. London: Longman 1993. Tracy, James D., ed. The Rise of Merchant Empires: State Power and World Trade, 1350–1750. New York: Cambridge University Press 1990. External links[edit] Empireat Wikipedia's sister projects Definitions from Wiktionary Media from Wikimedia Commons Quotations from Wikiquote Data from Wikidata Index of Colonies and Possessions Gavrov, Sergey Modernization of the Empire. Social and Cultural Aspects of Modernization Processes in Russia ISBN 978-5-354-00915-2 Mehmet Akif Okur, Rethinking Empire After 9/11: Towards A New Ontological Image of World Order, Perceptions, Journal of International Affairs, Volume XII, Winter 2007, pp. 61–93. v t e Empires Ancient (Colonies) Akkadian Neo-Sumerian Old Babylonian Egyptian Old Kingdom Middle Kingdom New Kingdom Assyrian Neo-Babylonian Phoenician Carthaginian Chinese Shang Qin Han Three Kingdoms Jin North and South Hellenistic Macedonian Seleucid Hittite Indian Nanda Maurya Satavahana Shunga Gupta Harsha Iranian Median Achaemenid Parthian Sasanian Kushan Mongol Xianbei Roman Western Eastern Teotihuacan Post-classical Aksum Arab Rashidun Umayyad Abbasid Fatimid Córdoba Aragonese Angevin Aztec Benin Bornu Bruneian Bulgarian First Second Byzantine Nicaea Thessalonica Trebizond Calakmul Castilian Chinese Sui Tang Liao Song Jīn Yuan Uyghur Khaganate Ethiopian Zagwe Solomonic Genoese Georgian Holy-Roman Carolingian Huetar Hunnic Hephthalite Inca Indian Chola Gurjara-Pratihara Pala Eastern Ganga dynasty Delhi Vijayanagara Iranian Samanid Saffarid Kanem Khmer Latin Majapahit Malaccan Mali Mongol Yuan Golden Horde Chagatai Khanate Ilkhanate Moroccan Idrisid Almoravid Almohad Marinid North Sea Oyo Serbian Singhasari Somali Ajuran Ifatite Adalite Mogadishan Songhai Srivijaya Tibetan Tikal Timurid Tiwanku Toltec Turko-Persian Ghaznavid Great Seljuk Khwarezmian Venetian Vietnamese Dai Viet Wagadou Wari Modern Afghan Ashanti Austrian Austro-Hungarian Brazilian Central African Chinese Ming Qing China Manchukuo Ethiopian Haitian First Second French First Second German First/Old Reich Second Reich Third Reich Indian Mughal Mysorean Sikh Maratha British Raj Iranian Safavid Afsharid Qajar Pahlavi Japanese Johor Korean Mexican First Second Moroccan Saadi Alaouite Russian Somali Gobroon Majeerteen Hobyo Swedish Tongan Ottoman Vietnamese Dainam Vietnam Colonial American Belgian British English Scottish Danish Dutch French German Italian Japanese Omani Polish–Lithuanian Couronian Portuguese Sovereign Military Order of Malta Spanish Swedish Lists Empires largest in India Ancient great powers Medieval great powers Modern great powers European colonialism African empires Miscellaneous The empire on which the sun never sets "Empire" as a description of foreign policy American empire Soviet Empire v t e Autonomous types of first-tier subdivision administration Federalism Asymmetric federalism Confederation Corporative federalism Dual federalism Ethnic federalism Federacy Federal monarchy Federal republic Federated state Federation Fiscal federalism Symmetric federalism List of federal countries Unitary state Devolution Regional state Unions Composite monarchy Continental union Dual monarchy Dynastic union Empire Colonial empire Multinational state Personal union Political union Real union Superstate Supranational union Subordinacy Associated state Client state Colony Dependent territory Direct rule Dominion Indirect rule Mandate Protectorate Puppet state Satellite state Trusteeship Tributary state Vassal state Development Annexation Cession Detachment Divided regions Empire-building Irredentism Military occupation Partition Secession Separatism Territorial dispute See also Autonomy Autonomous area Constituent state Decentralization Hegemony Home rule Stateless nation Subsidiarity Suzerainty Tribal sovereignty Authority control GND: 4139742-3 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Empire&oldid=996453887" Categories: Empires Constitutional state types Hidden categories: Pages using the EasyTimeline extension Harv and Sfn multiple-target errors Harv and Sfn no-target errors CS1 errors: missing periodical Webarchive template wayback links CS1 maint: uses authors parameter All articles with dead external links Articles with dead external links from August 2019 Articles with permanently dead external links Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata Articles needing additional references from April 2019 All articles needing additional references All articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases from January 2019 Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Articles which contain graphical timelines Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikiquote Languages Afrikaans Akan العربية Armãneashti Asturianu Avañe'ẽ Azərbaycanca تۆرکجه বাংলা Bân-lâm-gú Башҡортса Беларуская Български Bosanski Brezhoneg Català Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch ދިވެހިބަސް Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français Frysk Gaeilge Galego 한국어 Հայերեն हिन्दी Hrvatski Ido Bahasa Indonesia Íslenska Italiano עברית Jawa ქართული Қазақша Kurdî Кыргызча ລາວ Latina Latviešu Lietuvių Lingua Franca Nova Lumbaart Magyar Македонски मराठी მარგალური Bahasa Melayu Монгол Nederlands नेपाल भाषा 日本語 Norsk bokmål Norsk nynorsk Nouormand Occitan Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча ਪੰਜਾਬੀ پنجابی Picard Polski Português Română Русский Scots Shqip Simple English سنڌي Slovenščina کوردی Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Tagalog தமிழ் ไทย Тоҷикӣ Türkçe Українська اردو Tiếng Việt Winaray 吴语 ייִדיש Yorùbá 粵語 Zazaki 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 26 December 2020, at 18:31 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1608 ---- Portal:Current events - Wikipedia Portal:Current events From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Portal maintenance status: (October 2020) This portal's subpages have been checked by an editor, and are needed. Please take care when editing, especially if using automated editing software. Learn how to update the maintenance information here. Wikipedia's portal for exploring content related to Current events Edit instructions Worldwide current events Sports events Recent deaths Topics in the news COVID-19 pandemic Disease Virus By location Impact Vaccines Portal Chang'e 5 The closest great conjunction between Jupiter and Saturn since 1623 occurs. The Chang'e 5 (illustration shown) sample-return mission returns lunar material to Earth. Nana Akufo-Addo is re-elected for a second term as President of Ghana. Ongoing: Indian farmers' protest Tigray conflict Recent deaths: Robin Jackman Barry Lopez Phil Niekro Minoru Makihara Karima Baloch Jim McLean Nominate an article Current events of December 28, 2020 (2020-12-28) (Monday) edithistorywatch Armed conflicts and attacks Insurgency in the North Caucasus Knife-wielding assailants wound one and kill another police officer in the centre of the Chechen capital Grozny. Both attackers are shot dead. It is the second attack against police in the region in the last months, as in October two fellow officers were killed by militants. (Reuters) Aftermath of the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war An Azerbaijani soldier is killed and another injured during a shooting attack in Nagorno-Karabakh. Azerbaijan blames the attack on "an Armenian armed group"; all the six attackers are shot dead. (Al Jazeera) Disasters and accidents The Russian-flagged fishing trawler Onega capsizes near the Novaya Zemlya archipelago in the Barents Sea with 17 fishermen missing and are feared dead, while two have been rescued. Search and rescue operations in the area have been suspended due to strong winds and low temperatures. (AFP via The Moscow Times) Health and environment COVID-19 pandemic COVID-19 pandemic in Asia COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia Foreign Minister Retno Marsudi announces that the country will ban all International visitors for two weeks from January 1 to 14, citing concerns over new variants of SARS-CoV-2. Government officials are exempt. (Merdeka.com) COVID-19 pandemic in Japan Transport Minister Yuichiro Hata, who died yesterday, tested positive for COVID-19. He is the first Japanese lawmaker to die from the disease. (The Asahi Shimbun) COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia, Variant of Concern 202012/01 Saudi Arabia extends the suspension of all international commercial flights, as well as entry through land and sea ports for another week due to concern over the new SARS-CoV-2 variant. (Gulf News) COVID-19 pandemic in South Korea, Variant of Concern 202012/01 South Korea reports its first cases of a more infectious variant of SARS-CoV-2, after South Korean nationals who arrived from the United Kingdom tested positive for COVID-19, including an elderly man who has since died. (Yonhap News Agency) COVID-19 pandemic in Europe COVID-19 pandemic in Finland, Variant of Concern 202012/01 Finland reports its first case of a new variant of SARS-CoV-2, after a person who travelled from Western Europe test positive for COVID-19. (Yle) International relations European Union–United Kingdom relations, Trade negotiation between the UK and the EU European Union ambassadors unanimously approve the EU–UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement with the United Kingdom. (BBC) Law and crime COVID-19 pandemic in mainland China A court in China sentences a citizen journalist to four years in prison for "picking quarrels and provoking trouble" for reporting during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic last year in Wuhan. Her lawyer says they will "probably" appeal the verdict. (Reuters) A court in Saudi Arabia sentences women's rights activist Loujain al-Hathloul to five years and eight months in prison on grounds of "various activities prohibited by the anti-terrorism law". The verdict comes despite pressure from international organizations to release her. (DW) Current events of December 27, 2020 (2020-12-27) (Sunday) edithistorywatch Armed conflicts and attacks Boko Haram insurgency Boko Haram militants storms a village jear Gamboru, Nigeria, killing three people and abducting more than 40 others. It is the second mass abducting by the group this month. (Al Jazeera) Spillover of the Syrian Civil War in Lebanon Hundreds of Syrian refugees flee a makeshift camp in North Governorate, Lebanon, after local youths storm the camp and torch tents, wounding three people, according to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (Reuters) War in Darfur Sudan says it will deploy troops to South Darfur "in large numbers" following recent tribal violence between the Masalit and Fula. (Reuters) Business and economy Economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, CARES Act President Donald Trump signs the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, which contains a $900 billion COVID-19 relief package, before Monday's deadline, in order to avert a government shutdown. This comes after Trump called the bill a "disgrace" last week. (The Washington Post) (Politico) Disasters and accidents In Cameroon, a bus travelling from Douala, to the capital Yaoundé collides with a truck and plunges into a ravine, killing at least 37 people and injuring 19 others. (AFP via The Economic Times) Health and environment COVID-19 pandemic COVID-19 pandemic in North America COVID-19 pandemic in Canada COVID-19 pandemic in British Columbia, Variant of Concern 202012/01 British Columbia reports their first case of the new variant of SARS-CoV-2 from a man in Island Health who returned from the United Kingdom on December 15 and tested positive on December 19. (CBC) COVID-19 pandemic in Quebec Quebec reports 6,783 cases and 110 deaths between 24 and 26 December, bringing the total number of cases to 192,655 and deaths to 8,023. (Toronto Star) COVID-19 pandemic in the United States The U.S. surpasses 19 million cases of COVID-19, having averaged 185,000 daily cases over the past week. (The Hill) COVID-19 pandemic in Asia COVID-19 pandemic in Oman Oman officially begins a vaccination campaign against COVID-19 using the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. The country is the last Gulf Cooperation Council member state to begin vaccinations. Health Minister Ahmed Al-Saidi is one of the first citizens to receive a dose of the vaccine. (Arab News) The Supreme Committee decides to reopen Oman's land, sea, and air borders on December 29 after closing them on December 21 due to fears of a new variant of SARS-CoV-2. All travellers must show a negative PCR test within 72 hours before entering the country and must have valid health insurance. In addition, all travellers must quarantine for seven days and take another test after completing their quarantine. (Hindustan Times) COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia Indonesia reports a record 6,983 recoveries in the past 24 hours, bringing the nationwide total of recoveries to 583,676. (Kompas) COVID-19 pandemic in Jordan, Variant of Concern 202012/01 Jordan reports their first two cases of a new variant of SARS-CoV-2 in a couple who travelled from the United Kingdom. (Medical Xpress) COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia Saudi Arabia announces that they will lift their flight ban on non-Saudis leaving the country. (Al Arabiya) COVID-19 pandemic in South Korea South Korea extends its current social distancing measures aimed at reducing the spread of COVID-19 until January 3, as record numbers of new cases are being reported. (The Straits Times) COVID-19 pandemic in Europe COVID-19 pandemic in Austria Austria begins administering the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine tozinameran to its citizens. An 84-year-old woman becomes the first Austrian to be vaccinated against COVID-19 at the Medical University of Vienna. (ORF) COVID-19 pandemic in the Czech Republic The Czech Republic begins a vaccination campaign against COVID-19 using the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine tozinameran, with Prime Minister Andrej Babiš and World War II veteran Emilie Řepíková among the first people to get vaccinated. (Expats.cz) COVID-19 pandemic in Greece Greece officially begins a vaccination programme against COVID-19, with ICU nurse Efstathia Kambissiouli, President Katerina Sakellaropoulou and Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis among the first people to get vaccinated. (The National Herald) COVID-19 pandemic in Norway, Variant of Concern 202012/01 Norway reports its first cases of a new variant of SARS-CoV-2, after two people who travelled from the United Kingdom earlier in December test positive for COVID-19. (Reuters) COVID-19 pandemic in Portugal, Variant of Concern 202012/01 Portugal reports their first case of a new variant of SARS-CoV-2 from the United Kingdom in Madeira. (PUBLICO) COVID-19 pandemic in Romania Romania begins a vaccination campaign against COVID-19 using the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine tozinameran. The first person vaccinated is a 26-year-old doctor from Bucharest. (Digi24) The European Union begins a mass vaccination campaign against COVID-19. (NBC News) COVID-19 pandemic in South America COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil Brazilian Vice President Hamilton Mourão tests positive for COVID-19. (Diário do Nordeste) COVID-19 pandemic in Uruguay Uruguay reported a record of 11 deaths in the past 24 hours, bringing the nationwide death toll to 158. (El País) COVID-19 pandemic in South Africa South Africa surpasses one million cases of COVID-19, becoming the first African country to reach this milestone. (Voice of America) Law and crime Kaiyuan stabbing attack Seven people are killed and seven others injured in a mass stabbing in Kaiyuan, Liaoning, China. The attacker has been arrested. (BBC) 2020 Nashville bombing Authorities officially identify the perpetrator of Friday's suicide bombing in Nashville, Tennessee, as 63-year-old Anthony Quinn Warner and conclude that he had been acting alone. (The Tennessean) Politics and elections 2020 Nigerien general election Citizens in Niger head to the polls to elect their President in their first democratic power transfer since the country's independence from France. The election comes amidst a growing Islamist insurgency as Mohamed Bazoum is the favourite to succeed incumbent Mahamadou Issoufou, who is stepping down after serving two five-year terms. (DW) 2020 Central African general election Elections in the Central African Republic are underway, after a campaign marred by violence between government and rebel forces. (BBC) Science and technology The Solar Orbiter spacecraft makes its closest approach to Venus. (Space.com) Current events of December 26, 2020 (2020-12-26) (Saturday) edithistorywatch Armed conflicts and attacks Israeli–Palestinian conflict The Israeli military (IDF) carries out several airstrikes in the Gaza Strip, in response to overnight rocket attacks in Israel. IDF says it targeted a rocket manufacturing site, underground infrastructure and a military post. Two minor injuries are reported. The attacks caused power outages in the eastern part of the strip. Hamas claims the strikes damaged a children's hospital, a centre for disabled people, and damaged the windows of several residential buildings. IDF claims that the damage was due to detonations of ground munitions. (Al Jazeera) (The Times of Israel) Kashmir conflict India arrests 75 Kashmiri political leaders and activists for "preventive custody" due to recent violence following local elections. (Al Jazeera) Disasters and accidents Twelve climbers die during avalanches and blizzards on mountains north of Tehran, Iran. Fourteen others went missing but are rescued alive. (The Guardian) A fire inside an intensive care unit for COVID-19 patients at a hospital in Obour, Egypt, kills seven people and injures five others. (ABC News) Health and environment COVID-19 pandemic COVID-19 pandemic in Europe COVID-19 pandemic in Spain COVID-19 vaccine Spain receives its first shipment of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine tozinameran in Guadalajara, a day before the country begins its vaccination programme. (Euro Weekly News) COVID-19 pandemic in the Community of Madrid, Variant of Concern 202012/01 Madrid reports the nation's first four cases of a new variant of SARS-CoV-2. (The Guardian) COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom COVID-19 pandemic in Northern Ireland Northern Ireland enters a six-week lockdown in an effort to reduce the number of COVID-19 infections. All "non-essential" shops and businesses will be closed, while "essential" shops must close each day by 20:00 GMT during the first week of the lockdown. No gatherings will be allowed between 20:00 and 6:00 each day, and anyone travelling to Northern Ireland must self-isolate for at least 10 days. (BBC) COVID-19 pandemic in Belarus, 2020 Belarusian protests Two men jailed for protesting against President Alexander Lukashenko say they tested positive for COVID-19, after developing symptoms in jail and not receiving treatment. (AP) COVID-19 pandemic in Germany The German state of Saxony-Anhalt begins a vaccination campaign against COVID-19, which also began nationwide. A 101-year-old woman in a nursing home become one of first people in the country to get vaccinated. (DW) COVID-19 pandemic in Hungary Hungary begins a vaccination campaign against COVID-19 using the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine Tozinameran. The first vaccinations are being delivered at two hospitals in Budapest. (Reuters) COVID-19 pandemic in Russia Russia surpasses three million cases of COVID-19, becoming the fourth country to do so after the United States, India, and Brazil. (Arab News) (Mint) COVID-19 pandemic in Sweden, Variant of Concern 202012/01 Sweden reports their first case of a new variant of SARS-CoV-2 after a traveller from the United Kingdom tested positive for COVID-19. (The Hill) COVID-19 pandemic in North America COVID-19 pandemic in Canada COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario, Variant of Concern 202012/01 Ontario reports its first two cases of a new SARS-COV-2 variant in a couple from Durham Region with no known travel history, exposure, or high-risk contacts. Ontario is the first province in Canada to identify a case of this new variant. (CBC) COVID-19 pandemic in the United States The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issues guidelines stating that people with underlying health conditions can receive the vaccine. (The Hill) One out of every 1,000 Americans have died from COVID-19, according to a comparison of census and death toll estimates. (CNN) COVID-19 pandemic in Asia COVID-19 pandemic in Japan Tokyo reports a record 949 new cases in the past 24 hours, bringing the total number of confirmed cases in the prefecture to 55,851. (The Japan Times) The Japanese Foreign Ministry will ban non-resident foreign nationals from entering Japan from December 28 until the end of January after several cases of a more infectious variant of SARS-CoV-2 were reported in the country. Japanese citizens and foreign residents will be required to self-quarantine for 14 days when they enter the country. (CNN) COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia Indonesia reports a record 6,389 recoveries in the past 24 hours, bringing the nationwide total of recoveries to 576,693. (detikNews) COVID-19 pandemic in Iran Iran extends a nighttime traffic curfew that runs from 9:00 p.m. to 4:00 a.m. local time to 330 lower-risk "yellow" cities in an effort to sustain a recent decrease in the numbers of new cases and deaths. (Hindustan Times) COVID-19 pandemic in Malaysia Malaysia reports a record 2,335 new confirmed cases in the past 24 hours, bringing the nationwide total of confirmed cases to 103,900. (CNA) Law and crime 2020 Nashville bombing Federal investigators identify a person of interest in yesterday's bombing in downtown Nashville, Tennessee, and join local police in raiding his home. (AP) Authorities announce that they suspect the incident was a suicide bombing, following the discovery of human remains at the blast site. (CNN) Crime in Germany Four men are seriously injured in a mass shooting in Kreuzberg, Berlin. The city's attorney said that rival gangs may have been responsible for the shooting. (BBC) Crime in China China lowers the age of criminal responsibility to 12 years old for "abominable" crimes such as murder or causing injury that leads to death or severe disabilities by extremely cruel means. The measure was passed by the National People's Congress Standing Committee. (Al Arabiya) Don Carter Lanes shooting Three people are killed, and three others are injured, during a mass shooting at a bowling alley in Rockford, Illinois. Police believe the suspect, in custody, identified as a soldier from Florida, randomly selected his victims. (Al Jazeera) Politics and elections 2021 Ethiopian general election The government sets June 5 as the date for the 2021 parliamentary elections. The elections were delayed to 2021 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic with the delay being a cause of the ongoing Tigray conflict. (Reuters) Sports Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on sports, 2020 NFL season The Cleveland Browns announce that they will close their facility and delay their flight to New Jersey for an upcoming matchup with the New York Jets after a player on the team tested positive for COVID-19. (Reuters) Current events of December 25, 2020 (2020-12-25) (Friday) edithistorywatch Armed conflicts and attacks Central African Republic Civil War Three United Nations peacekeepers from Burundi are killed and two others injured in the Central African Republic during two attacks by unknown gunmen. The shootings are carried out two days before the general election in the country. (BBC) Disasters and accidents A boat overturns and sinks due to strong winds on the Ugandan side of Lake Albert, killing 26 people. (BBC) Health and environment COVID-19 pandemic COVID-19 pandemic in Asia COVID-19 pandemic in Hong Kong The authorities extends the compulsory quarantine in designed hotels to 21 days for visitors from outside China, Macau, and Taiwan beginning tomorrow and also ban all people who stayed in South Africa over the past 21 days from entering Hong Kong in order to prevent the spread of new variants of SARS-CoV-2. (The Straits Times) COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia Indonesia reports a record 258 deaths and 6,324 recoveries in the past 24 hours, bringing the nationwide totals to 20,847 deaths and 570,304 recoveries. (CNN Indonesia) COVID-19 pandemic in Japan Japan reports their first cases of the new variant of SARS-COV-2 in five people who arrived from the United Kingdom. (The Japan Times) COVID-19 pandemic in Kyrgyzstan Kyrgyzstan surpasses 80,000 cases of COVID-19. (Xinhua News Agency) COVID-19 pandemic in Lebanon, Variant of Concern 202012/01 Lebanon reports their first case of a new variant of SARS-CoV-2 in a passenger on a Middle East Airlines flight from London on December 21. (The National) COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia, COVID-19 vaccine Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman receives a COVID-19 vaccine. (The Hill) COVID-19 pandemic in South Korea South Korea reports a record 1,241 new confirmed cases in the past 24 hours, bringing the nationwide total to 54,770 cases. (Yonhap News Agency) COVID-19 pandemic in Europe COVID-19 pandemic in France, Variant of Concern 202012/01 France reports their first case of the new variant of SARS-CoV-2 in a French citizen who travelled from London to Tours, France on December 19. (Sky News) COVID-19 pandemic in the Republic of Ireland, Variant of Concern 202012/01 Chief Medical Officer Tony Holohan confirms that the Republic has detected the new variant of SARS-CoV-2 from the United Kingdom as the country reports more than 1,000 for the first time in two months. (Independent.ie) COVID-19 pandemic in Russia, Variant of Concern 202012/01 Rospotrebnadzor orders a 14-day quarantine for anyone who travels from the United Kingdom, with the exception of aircraft crew members, beginning tomorrow due to the spread of a more contagious variant of SARS-CoV-2. (The Moscow Times) COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey Turkey signs a deal with BioNTech to receive up to 30 million doses of their vaccine. (Daily Sabah) COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom The United Kingdom exceeds 70,000 deaths from COVID-19. (The Independent) (BBC) COVID-19 pandemic in Africa COVID-19 pandemic in Mali, COVID-19 pandemic in France Malian opposition leader Soumaila Cissé dies from COVID-19 in France two months after he was released by jihadist militants in a prisoner swap. (France 24) COVID-19 pandemic in Morocco, COVID-19 vaccine Morocco is expected to acquire 65 million vaccine doses from AstraZeneca and Sinopharm. (ABC News) COVID-19 pandemic in South Africa South Africa reports a record 14,796 new cases in the past 24 hours, bringing the nationwide total to 983,359 cases. (The Citizens) Law and crime 2020 Nashville bombing An explosion occurs in a recreational vehicle in downtown Nashville, Tennessee, U.S., causing structural damage and injuring three people. Police believe the explosion was an "intentional act". (CNN) (The Tennessean) The explosion also results in AT&T service outages across the U.S. due to infrastructure damage to a service facility located near the blast site. Cellular, wireline telephone, Internet, and U-verse television service, as well as multiple local 9-1-1 and non-emergency phone networks, are among the services affected. (WKRN-TV) (The Tennessean) 2018 Puebla helicopter crash Four people are arrested for a helicopter crash in Puebla, Mexico, that killed Governor Martha Érika Alonso, her husband, and former Governor Rafael Moreno Valle Rosas. (ABC News) A court in Russia sentences prominent historian Oleg Sokolov to 12 and a half years in prison for the murder and dismemberment of his student lover. Sokolov, a former history professor at St. Petersburg State University, pled guilty to the murder. (Reuters) Sports Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on sports Greg Norman, Australian former world number one champion of the 1986 and 1993 Open Championships, tests positive for COVID-19 and is hospitalized in the United States due to having symptoms. (BBC) Current events of December 24, 2020 (2020-12-24) (Thursday) edithistorywatch Armed conflicts and attacks Metekel conflict Metekel massacre The Ethiopian National Defense Force clashes with armed bandits involved in yesterday's massacre, killing 42 of them and seizing weapons. (Al Arabiya English) Boko Haram insurgency Pemi attack Boko Haram jihadists storm Pemi, a Christian village in Borno State, Nigeria, shooting people and burning down a church and a hospital, killing at least 11 civilians. A priest is kidnapped. (BBC) Insurgency in the Maghreb Niger says seven troops and 11 Islamist militants have been killed in clashes in Tillabéri, ahead of Sunday's general election. (Arab News) War in Afghanistan December 2020 Afghanistan attacks Gunmen on a motorbike shoot dead a women’s rights activist and her brother near their home in Kohistan, Afghanistan. (Al Jazeera) Business and economy Economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, CARES Act Republicans in the House block an attempt by Democrats, empowered by a veto threat from President Donald Trump if not amended, to pass a $2,000 relief bill for Americans. However, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announces that the House will still hold a vote on the bill on Monday. (CNBC) (NBC News) Disasters and accidents European migrant crisis At least 20 African migrants die when their boat sinks off the coast of Tunisia as they tried to cross the Mediterranean Sea to the Italian island of Lampedusa. The coast guard confirmed they had rescued people and were searching for others who were on the boat, which was carrying a total of 45 people. (Reuters) Health and environment COVID-19 pandemic COVID-19 pandemic in North America COVID-19 pandemic in the United States Travel restrictions related to the COVID-19 pandemic, VOC-202012/01 The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention announces that American passengers traveling from the United Kingdom will be required to test negative for COVID-19 within 72 hours due to the emergence of a new variant of SARS-CoV-2. The order is expected to take effect on December 28. (MarketWatch) United Airlines and Delta Air Lines will require passengers from the United Kingdom to test negative for COVID-19 due to the emergence of a new variant of SARS-CoV-2. (Reuters) COVID-19 pandemic in California California surpasses two million cases of COVID-19, becoming the first U.S. state to do so. (CBS News) COVID-19 pandemic in Arkansas Arkansas reports 3,204 new cases on Christmas Eve, a new single-day record. (Arkansas Democrat-Gazette) COVID-19 pandemic in Mexico, COVID-19 vaccine Mexico begins vaccinations with the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. An intensive care unit nurse in Mexico City becomes the first person in the country to receive the vaccine. (The Washington Post) COVID-19 pandemic in Canada COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario Ontario reports 2,447 cases on Christmas Eve, a new single-day record. (The Chronicle-Journal) COVID-19 pandemic in Quebec Quebec reports 2,349 cases over the past 24 hours, a new single-day record. (Montreal Gazette) COVID-19 pandemic in Asia COVID-19 pandemic in Japan Tokyo reports a record 888 new cases in the past 24 hours, bringing the total number of confirmed cases in the prefecture to 54,018. (NHK World) Nationwide, a record 3,743 new cases are reported in Japan in the past 24 hours. (The Japan Times) COVID-19 pandemic in mainland China, VOC-202012/01, travel restrictions related to the COVID-19 pandemic China says it will suspend all direct flights to and from the United Kingdom indefinitely due to the new variant of SARS-CoV-2. (CNA) COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia, VOC-202012/01 Indonesia issues a ban on travellers from the United Kingdom and restricts entry to people from mainland Europe and Australia to prevent the spread of the new variant of SARS-CoV-2. COVID-19 Task Force Chief Doni Monardo says that these measures will remain in place until January 8. (Reuters) COVID-19 pandemic in Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the Health Ministry announce that a third nationwide lockdown will begin from December 27 at 5:00 p.m. local time for at least two weeks in order to curb the resurgence of COVID-19. (The Times of Israel) COVID-19 pandemic in Malaysia Malaysia surpasses 100,000 cases of COVID-19. (CNA) COVID-19 pandemic in Europe COVID-19 pandemic in Germany Germany reports the first case of a new variant of SARS-CoV-2 from the United Kingdom after a woman who flew from London to Frankfurt this weekend tested positive for COVID-19. (DW) COVID-19 pandemic in Italy Italy surpasses two million cases of COVID-19. (ANSA) COVID-19 pandemic in Russia Russia reports a record 29,935 new cases and 635 deaths in the past 24 hours, thus bringing the nationwide totals to 2,963,688 confirmed cases and 53,096 deaths. (Arab News) COVID-19 pandemic in Serbia, COVID-19 vaccine Serbia officially begins its vaccination programme against COVID-19, with Prime Minister Ana Brnabić becoming the first person to receive the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. (Anadolu Agency) COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey, COVID-19 vaccine Turkey announces that CoronaVac is 91.25% effective in preventing COVID-19 based on data in interim studies. These initial results follow Phase III trials that involved 7,371 volunteers. (Daily Sabah) COVID-19 pandemic in Ukraine Ukraine surpasses one million cases of COVID-19. (Kyiv Post) COVID-19 pandemic in South America COVID-19 pandemic in Argentina, COVID-19 vaccine Over 300,000 doses of Russia's Sputnik V vaccine arrive in Argentina. (Livemint) COVID-19 pandemic in Chile, COVID-19 vaccine Chile begins its vaccination campaign against COVID-19 after the arrival of 10,000 doses of Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine to the country. (Prensa Latina) International relations European Union–United Kingdom relations, Trade negotiation between the UK and the EU The United Kingdom and the European Union agree on a post-Brexit trade deal. (BBC) Law and crime In Pakistan, the Sindh High Court orders the release of Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh, initially sentenced to death for the kidnapping and murder of American journalist Daniel Pearl in Karachi in 2002. The government opposes his release on the basis of public safety; both the government and Pearl's family will appeal the decision. (Al Jazeera) A 37-year-old man is charged with murder and hate crimes in Los Angeles, California, U.S., after killing a 82-year-old man in a hospital room for praying. Both men were in the hospital after testing positive for COVID-19. (BBC) The President of Burundi, Évariste Ndayishimiye, pardons four journalists jailed since 2019 for offences related to "undermining state security" following a petition by human rights groups and the journalists themselves. (Reuters) Politics and elections 2020 Moldovan presidential election Maia Sandu is sworn in as the first female President of Moldova. (Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty) Current events of December 23, 2020 (2020-12-23) (Wednesday) edithistorywatch Armed conflicts and attacks Central African Republic Civil War A coalition of rebel groups briefly seize the city of Bambari from the Central African Republic government and United Nations before being driven off in a UN counter-offensive. (France 24) War in Afghanistan December 2020 Afghanistan attacks Yousuf Rasheed, CEO of the Free and Fair Election Forum of Afghanistan, is killed by unknown gunmen in Kabul. His driver is also shot and later died of his wounds. It is the latest targeted killing of a prominent Afghan figure. (TOLO News) Metekel conflict Metekel massacre More than 100 people are killed and at least 30 others wounded in a massacre in Metekel, Benishangul-Gumuz, Ethiopia. (BBC) Business and economy Shortages related to the COVID-19 pandemic, Economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom Lufthansa ships 80 tonnes of fresh food to the United Kingdom to prevent shortages amid fears that the lifting of the French blockade of the France–UK border will not prevent shortages in some supermarkets. The airline says "additional special cargo flights" are planned to meet demand. Thousands of trucks remain outside of Dover. (The Guardian) Health and environment COVID-19 pandemic COVID-19 pandemic in North America COVID-19 pandemic in the United States COVID-19 pandemic in New York (state) COVID-19 pandemic in New York City, VOC-202012/01 Mayor Bill de Blasio orders people traveling from the United Kingdom to quarantine or face fines due to the discovery of a new variant of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. (CBS News) The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says that 1 million Americans have received the vaccines. (Politico) COVID-19 pandemic in Canada Health Canada approves the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine and expects that up to 168,000 doses will arrive in Canada by the end of the year. (CBC) COVID-19 pandemic in Asia COVID-19 pandemic in India COVID-19 pandemic in Karnataka, VOC-202012/01 Karnataka imposes a night curfew from 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. IST until January 2 due to fears of a mutant version of SARS-CoV-2 that was found in the United Kingdom. It becomes the second Indian state to do so after Maharashtra. (NDTV) COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia The number of recovered patients in Indonesia increases by a record 5,981 in the past 24 hours, bringing the nationwide total of recovered patients to 558,703. (detikNews) COVID-19 pandemic in Japan, VOC-202012/01 Japan bans the entry of non-Japanese citizens from the United Kingdom beginning tomorrow, following the emergence of a more infectious strain of SARS-CoV-2. (The Straits Times) COVID-19 pandemic in Malaysia Malaysia discovers a new variant of SARS-CoV-2 named A701B in Sabah. It has been deemed to be more infectious. (The Star) COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines, VOC-202012/01 President Rodrigo Duterte approves the suspension of flights from the Philippines to the United Kingdom from tomorrow at 12:01 a.m. local time until December 31 due to concerns about the new strain of SARS-CoV-2. (ABS-CBN News) COVID-19 pandemic in Qatar Qatar begins administering the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine Tozinameran to its citizens at designated health centers in the country. Those aged over 70, adults with chronic health conditions and healthcare personnel are to be prioritised for the vaccine. (The Peninsula Qatar) COVID-19 pandemic in Singapore, VOC-202012/01 Singapore reports the first case of a mutated variant of SARS-CoV-2 from the United Kingdom when 17-year-old girl who had studied in the United Kingdom tested positive for COVID-19. (The Straits Times) COVID-19 pandemic in South Korea, VOC-202012/01 South Korea suspends flights to and from the United Kingdom until December 31 over concerns about the new strain of SARS-CoV-2. (KBS World) COVID-19 pandemic in Europe COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom The United Kingdom reports a record 39,237 new cases in the past 24 hours. In addition, the country also reports 744 deaths, the highest single-day total since April 29. (ITV) Health Secretary Matt Hancock announces a ban on travel from South Africa due to the discovery of a mutated variant of SARS-CoV-2 in South Africa. (Business Standard) Hancock also announces that more locations in England will be placed in Tier 4 restrictions beginning on Boxing Day, including Oxfordshire, West Sussex, and the remainder of East Sussex. (The Guardian) COVID-19 pandemic in the Czech Republic The government announces that the Czech Republic will be moving to the highest level of PES measures beginning on December 27. This means that all non-essential shops will be closed and a curfew between 9:00 p.m. to 5:00 a.m. local time on Sunday will be enforced. There will also be no exceptions on New Year's Eve. (Expats.cz) COVID-19 pandemic in Germany Germany reports a record 962 deaths in the past 24 hours, according to data from the Robert Koch Institute, bringing the nationwide death toll to 27,968. (dpa International) COVID-19 pandemic in Italy Italy surpasses 70,000 deaths from COVID-19. (Huffington Post) COVID-19 pandemic in Switzerland Switzerland begins a mass vaccination campaign against COVID-19 using the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine Tozinameran. A ninety-year-old woman in Lucerne is the first Swiss citizen to receive the vaccine. (Reuters) International relations Belarus–United States relations, International reactions to the 2020 Belarusian presidential election and protests The Trump administration imposes additional sanctions against Belarusian officials and four offices for human rights abuses that occurred during protests against President Alexander Lukashenko. (The Hill) Law and crime 2020 Saint-Just shooting Three police officers are killed and a fourth wounded after they responded to a domestic violence incident in Saint-Just, Puy-de-Dôme, France. The gunman, who set his house on fire, is later found dead. The gunman's partner was rescued. (BBC) Travel restrictions related to the COVID-19 pandemic Stranded lorry drivers clash with police in Kent, England, amid frustrations over ongoing delays at the border with France. At least one person has been arrested for obstructing a highway, according to the police. (The Guardian) Politics and elections Elections in Israel Parliament is dissolved as the deadline to approve the 2020 state budget expires without an agreement, requiring elections within 90 days, for the fourth time in less than two years. (The Times of Israel) Presidency of Donald Trump U.S. President Donald Trump pardons former presidential campaign manager Paul Manafort, former adviser Roger Stone, and real estate developer Charles Kushner. Manafort was convicted of tax fraud and obstructing an investigation; Stone of lying to Congress; Kushner of tax evasion, campaign finance offences and witness tampering. (BBC) Moldovan Prime Minister Ion Chicu announces that he will resign ahead of President-elect Maia Sandu's inauguration. (Al Jazeera) Science and technology A ~8 metres (26 ft) asteroid falls over Nangqên, in western China on the Qinghai-Tibet border. This was the largest asteroid to hit Earth since the Kamchatka meteor in 2018, and the largest to fall over land since the Chelyabinsk meteor in 2013. (Daily Mail) (JPL Center for NEO Studies) Current events of December 22, 2020 (2020-12-22) (Tuesday) edithistorywatch Armed conflicts and attacks War in Afghanistan December 2020 Afghanistan attacks Four prison doctors are killed after a magnetic bomb attached to their vehicle exploded in Kabul. A civilian passerby also died in the attack. The bombing follows a series of recent assassination attempts and targeted killings of prominent Afghan figures. (Channel News Asia) War in Darfur The United Nations Security Council votes to end the United Nations–African Union Mission in Darfur on December 31, beginning a complete withdrawal of peacekeeping forces by June 30, 2021. (Middle East Monitor) Business and economy Economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, CARES Act President Donald Trump says that he might not sign the $900 billion relief bill, which was passed by both the House and Senate. He also calls for Congress to amend the bill and increase stimulus checks to Americans earning under $75,000 per year from $600 to $2,000. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi agrees to work with Congress to increase the payout amount. (The Washington Post) (BBC) (WFLA-TV) Health and environment COVID-19 pandemic COVID-19 pandemic in North America Travel restrictions related to the COVID-19 pandemic, VOC-202012/01 COVID-19 pandemic in Guatemala Guatemala announces a mandatory two-week quarantine for anyone who has recently visited the United Kingdom or South Africa in an effort to prevent the spread of a new variant of SARS-CoV-2. The restrictions will last for two months. (Reuters) COVID-19 pandemic in the United States COVID-19 pandemic in Maryland NIAID director Dr. Anthony Fauci receives the Moderna vaccine at the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, Maryland. (ABC News) COVID-19 pandemic in Mississippi Mississippi Governor Tate Reeves announces that he has extended the mask mandate to 78 counties in the state. (AP) COVID-19 pandemic in New York (state), VOC-202012/01 New York Governor Andrew Cuomo orders hospitals in the state to begin testing for the new SARS-CoV-2 variant from the United Kingdom. (WNBC) COVID-19 pandemic in Washington, D.C. White House Coronavirus Task Force director Deborah Birx says that she will retire after President-elect Joe Biden's transition is completed. (NPR) Overall deaths in the U.S. for this year are projected to surpass three million mainly due to the COVID-19 pandemic, thus making 2020 the deadliest year in U.S. history. The numbers also represent an approximate 15 percent increase compared to the previous year, which is the largest single-year percentage increase since 1918. (AP) COVID-19 pandemic in Canada COVID-19 pandemic in Quebec Quebec reports 2,183 cases, a new-single day record. (The Globe and Mail) COVID-19 pandemic in Asia COVID-19 vaccine COVID-19 pandemic in Iraq Iraq signs a preliminary deal to receive 1.5 million doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine Tozinameran. Ministry of Health spokesman Seif al-Badr says troops and the elderly will be prioritized for vaccinations. (France 24) COVID-19 pandemic in Malaysia Malaysia signs a deal to receive 6.4 million doses of the AstraZeneca vaccine. (The Star) COVID-19 pandemic in United Arab Emirates The United Arab Emirates announces that they will roll out the Sinopharm vaccine to all adult UAE citizens. (Financial Times) Abu Dhabi is expected to lift restrictions in the city beginning December 24. (Al Arabiya) COVID-19 pandemic in Singapore, VOC-202012/01 Singapore bans all long-term passport holders and short-term visitors who had travel history to the United Kingdom within the last 14 days to enter the country beginning tomorrow at 11:59 p.m. local time due to the emergence of a new strain of SARS-CoV-2. (The Straits Times) COVID-19 pandemic in South Korea Prime Minister Chung Sye-kyun announces that the country will ban gatherings of more than five people and order all ski resorts and tourist attractions to close from December 24 until January 3 in order to contain the third wave of COVID-19. (Al Jazeera) COVID-19 pandemic in Sri Lanka, VOC-202012/01 Sri Lanka's Civil Aviation Authority bans all flights to and from the United Kingdom beginning on December 23 to prevent a new strain of SARS-CoV-2 from spreading to the country. (Adaderana) COVID-19 pandemic in Taiwan Taiwan reports their first locally transmitted case since April 12 after an unidentified patient tested positive for COVID-19. (Bloomberg) COVID-19 pandemic in Europe COVID-19 pandemic in France, VOC-202012/01 France agrees to reopen its border with the United Kingdom after it was closed for 48 hours due to the spread of a new variant of the virus in England. Planes, boats, and Eurostar trains will resume services tomorrow but only British, French, and EU citizens or residents who show a negative COVID-19 test result from the previous 72 hours will be allowed to travel until January 6. (BBC) COVID-19 pandemic in the Republic of Ireland Taoiseach Micheál Martin announces a return of "Level 5" lockdown in the country with specific adjustments from Christmas Eve until at least January 12. (The Journal) COVID-19 pandemic in Slovakia Finance Minister Eduard Heger tests positive for COVID-19. (TV Noviny) COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom The United Kingdom reports a record 36,804 new cases in the past 24 hours. In addition, the country also reports 691 new deaths, the highest daily total in nearly a month. (Sky News) COVID-19 pandemic in Peru Peru surpasses one million cases of COVID-19, becoming the fifth Latin American country to surpass the milestone after Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, and Mexico. (AP) COVID-19 pandemic in Fiji, VOC-202012/01 Fiji announces it will close its borders from Thursday until next Monday to review border quarantine processes after a new variant of the virus was found in the United Kingdom. (RNZ) COVID-19 pandemic in Malawi Malawi closes its borders for 14 days and restricts public gatherings to no more than 100 people due to an increase in COVID-19 cases. (Malawi 24) International relations Israel–Morocco relations Israel–Morocco normalization agreement El Al operates the first direct commercial flight between Israel and Morocco following the normalization agreement between the two countries on December 10. Senior Advisor to the U.S. President Jared Kushner and Israel's National Security Advisor Meir Ben-Shabbat are among the high-level officials on board the flight. (AFP via Barron's) Colombia–Russia relations Migración Colombia confirms the expulsion of two Russian diplomats accused of espionage. (Reuters) Cayman Islands–United States relations, COVID-19 pandemic in the Cayman Islands The appeals court of the Cayman Islands reduces the prison sentence of Georgia teenager Skylar Mack from 4 months to 2 months. Mack was arrested on November 29 for breaching quarantine rules. (CBS News) China–South Korea relations, Russia–South Korea relations South Korea says it has scrambled fighter jets after four Chinese and fifteen Russian military aircraft entered its air defense identification zone. South Korea's Joint Chiefs of Staff says that it was notified in advance by China of a joint military exercise between China and Russia. (Reuters) Politics and elections Cabinet of Indonesia President Joko Widodo announces a year-end reshuffle of the Onward Indonesia Cabinet with the replacement of six ministers who had been in the cabinet since October 2019, including two ministers who were arrested by the Corruption Eradication Commission due to separate bribery cases. (The Jakarta Post) Sandiaga Uno, businessman and former candidate of the 2019 presidential election, is appointed as the new Tourism and Creative Economy Minister. It is the first time in Indonesian history that all candidates who previously ran in a presidential election serve together in the same cabinet. (Jakarta Globe) 2021 Israeli legislative election The Knesset fails to pass legislation to avert a dispersal of the current legislative session, triggering new elections in March. (JPost) Science and technology Chinese space program The maiden flight of the Long March 8 orbital launch vehicle is launched from Wenchang Spacecraft Launch Site at 04:37 UTC, carrying five satellites. (Reuters) More December 2020 events... Time: 18:27 UTC|Day: 28 December ◀ December 2020 ▶ S M T W T F S     1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21   22     23     24     25     26     27     28   29 30 31     More December 2020 events...    About this page Report a dispute • News about Wikipedia Ongoing events Business COVID-19 recession FinCEN Files leak Disasters COVID-19 pandemic 2020–21 European windstorm season 2020 H5N8 outbreak 2019–20 locust infestation 2020 North Indian Ocean cyclone season 2020 Pacific typhoon season 2018–20 Southern Africa drought 2020 wildfire season Yemeni famine Politics Afghan peace process Armenian protests Belarusian protests Bulgarian protests Chilean protests Hong Kong protests Indian farmers protests Indonesia omnibus law protests Kashmir lock-down Libyan peace process Nicaraguan protests Nigerian protests Persian Gulf crisis Peruvian protests Philippine protests (timeline) Polish protests Post-Brexit diplomatic talks (trade negotiations) Second Arab Spring Sudanese protests Thai protests United States election protests United States racial unrest Venezuelan presidential crisis (protests) Yellow vests movement edit section Elections and referendums Recent December 27: Central African Republic, President (1st), National Assembly (1st) 27: Niger, President (1st), National Assembly Upcoming January 10: Kazakhstan, Majilis 10: Kyrgyzstan, President, Constitutional referendum 10: Uganda, President (1st), Parliament edit section Trials Recently concluded France: Charlie Hebdo shooting Greece: Nikolaos Michaloliakos Ongoing Argentina: Rodolfo Martín Villa Armenia: Serzh Sargsyan Colombia: Álvaro Uribe France: Nicolas Sarkozy Israel: Benjamin Netanyahu Kyrgyzstan: Almazbek Atambayev Malta: Yorgen Fenech South Africa: Jacob Zuma Spain: Bárcenas affair, 2017 Catalonia attacks Sudan: Omar al-Bashir United States: Fat Leonard scandal, Varsity Blues scandal International: The Gambia v. Myanmar Upcoming Indonesia: Edhy Prabowo, Juliari Batubara, Muhammad Rizieq Shihab Kosovo: Hashim Thaçi, Kadri Veseli Lesotho: Maesiah Thabane Rwanda: Paul Rusesabagina Spain: Jordi Pujol United States: Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Elizabeth Holmes, Meng Wanzhou, R. Kelly, Ghislaine Maxwell, Steve Bannon Vanuatu: Charlot Salwai Zimbabwe: Ignatius Chombo edit section Sport Association football 2020–21 Premier League 2020 Campeonato Brasileiro Série A 2020–21 UEFA Nations League 2020 Copa Libertadores 2020–21 UEFA Champions League group stage 2020–21 UEFA Europa League group stage Women's association football 2020–21 Champions League 2020–21 Division 1 Féminine 2020–21 FA WSL American football 2020 NFL season 2020 NCAA Division I FBS Baseball 2021 MLB season Basketball 2020–21 NBA season 2020–21 NCAA Division I men's basketball season 2020–21 NCAA Division I women's basketball season Golf 2020–21 PGA Tour Ice hockey 2020–21 KHL season 2020–21 NHL season Motorsport 2020 Formula One Championship 2020 Rally Championship Rugby union 2020–21 Premiership Rugby 2020–21 Pro14 2019–20 Top 14 Other sports seasons 2020–21 international cricket season 2020–21 snooker season 2020–21 curling season More details – current sports events edit section Recent deaths December 2020 27: Armando Manzanero 26: George Blake 26: Brodie Lee 26: Phil Niekro 25: Michael Alig 25: Soumaïla Cissé 25: Danny Hodge 25: K. C. Jones 25: Jamal Khwaja 24: Ivry Gitlis 23: James E. Gunn 23: Rebecca Luker 23: Frankie Randall 23: Sugathakumari 23: Leslie West 22: Muhammad Mustafa Mero 22: Stella Tennant 21: Kevin Greene 21: K. T. Oslin 21: Motilal Vora 20: Doug Anthony 20: Ezra Vogel 19: Shirley Abrahamson 19: David Giler 19: Rosalind Knight 19: Mekere Morauta 19: Leo Panitch 18: Aristóteles Sandoval 18: José Vicente Rangel 18: Òscar Ribas Reig 18: Michael Jeffery 18: Peter Lamont 18: Rahah Noah 17: Donato Bilancia 17: Jeremy Bulloch 17: Pierre Buyoya 17: Stanley Cowell 17: Hennadiy Kernes 17: Saufatu Sopoanga 17: Pelle Svensson 16: Awesome Again 16: Flavio Cotti 16: Leticia Lee 16: Lorenzo Taliaferro 15: Ungku Abdul Aziz 15: Anthony Casso 15: Donald Fowler 15: Bruce Seals 14: Herman Asaribab 14: Gérard Houllier 14: Roddam Narasimha 14: Paulo César dos Santos 14: Totilas 14: Huang Zongying 13: Ambrose Mandvulo Dlamini 13: Nur Hossain Kasemi 12: John le Carré 12: Charley Pride 12: Ann Reinking 12: Ruhollah Zam 11: Kenneth Alwyn 11: Kim Ki-duk 10: Tommy Lister Jr. 10: Barbara Windsor 9: Paolo Rossi 9: Mohammad Yazdi 8: Harold Budd 8: Alejandro Sabella 8: Yevgeny Shaposhnikov 7: Dick Allen 7: Joselyn Cano 7: Chuck Yeager 6: Paul Sarbanes 6: Tabaré Vázquez 5: Peter Alliss 4: David Lander 4: James Odongo 3: Mahashay Dharampal Gulati 2: Warren Berlinger 2: Richard Corben 2: Valéry Giscard d'Estaing 2: Zafarullah Khan Jamali 2: Rafer Johnson 2: Pat Patterson 2: Walter E. Williams 1: Hugh Keays-Byrne 1: Brian Kerr November 2020 28: Dave Prowse 27: Tony Hsieh edit section Ongoing conflicts Africa Algeria, Libya and Tunisia Maghreb insurgency Cameroon Anglophone Crisis Cameroon, Chad, Niger, and Nigeria Boko Haram insurgency Central African Republic Civil War Democratic Republic of the Congo Kivu conflict Allied Democratic Forces insurgency Ituri conflict Lord's Resistance Army insurgency Ethiopia Tigray conflict Mali Mali War Mozambique Insurgency in Cabo Delgado Nigeria Communal conflicts in Nigeria Somalia Civil war South Sudan Ethnic violence (South Sudanese Civil War) Sudan War in Darfur South Kordofan conflict Sudanese nomadic conflicts Western Sahara Western Sahara conflict 2020 Western Saharan clashes Americas Colombia Colombian conflict Mexico Mexican War on Drugs Peru Internal conflict in Peru Asia-Pacific Afghanistan Afghanistan War China Xinjiang conflict India Naxalite–Maoist insurgency Insurgency in Northeast India India and Pakistan Kashmir conflict Border skirmishes Indonesia, Malaysia and the Philippines Moro conflict Cross border attacks in Sabah Indonesia Papua conflict Myanmar Internal conflict in Myanmar Kachin conflict Karen conflict Rohingya conflict Pakistan Insurgency in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Insurgency in Balochistan Philippines Communist rebellion in the Philippines Philippine Drug War Thailand South Thailand insurgency Europe Armenia and Azerbaijan Nagorno-Karabakh conflict Russia Chechen–Russian conflict Ukraine War in Donbass Russo-Ukrainian War Middle East Egypt Sinai insurgency Iran and the Persian Gulf Iran–Israel proxy conflict Iran–Saudi Arabia proxy conflict Iraq American-led intervention in Iraq Iranian intervention in Iraq Iraq and Syria (map) International military intervention against ISIL Israel and Gaza Israel and Syria Israeli-Syrian border conflict Syria American-led intervention in Syria Russian military intervention in the Syrian Civil War Turkey Kurdish–Turkish conflict Yemen and Saudi Arabia Yemeni Civil War Saudi Arabian-led intervention in Yemen Second Saudi–Yemeni War Further information: List of ongoing armed conflicts edit section 2020 events and developments by topic Arts Architecture – Comics – Film – Home video – Literature – Music (Country, Rock, Metal, UK, US) – Radio – Television (UK, US) – Video games Politics and government Elections – International leaders – Sovereign states – Sovereign state leaders – Territorial governors Science and technology Archaeology – Biotechnology – Computing – Palaeontology – Quantum computing and communication – Space/Astronomy – Spaceflight Environment and environmental sciences Birding/Ornithology Transportation Aviation – Rail transport By place Afghanistan – Albania – Algeria – Andorra – Angola – Antarctica – Argentina – Armenia – Australia – Austria – Azerbaijan – Bangladesh – The Bahamas – Bahrain – Barbados – Belarus – Belgium – Benin – Bhutan – Bolivia – Bosnia and Herzegovina – Botswana – Brazil – Bulgaria – Burkina Faso – Burundi – Cambodia – Cameroon – Canada – Cape Verde – Central African Republic – Chad – Chile – China – Colombia – Costa Rica – Comoros – Croatia – Cuba – Cyprus – Czechia – Denmark – Ecuador – Egypt – El Salvador – Eritrea – Estonia – Ethiopia – European Union – Eswatini – Fiji – Finland – France – Gabon – Georgia – Germany – Ghana – Greece – Guatemala – Guinea – Guinea-Bissau – Guyana – Haiti – Honduras – Hong Kong – Hungary – Iceland – India – Indonesia – Iran – Iraq – Ireland – Israel – Italy – Ivory Coast – Japan – Jordan – Kazakhstan – Kenya – Kiribati – Kosovo – Kuwait – Kyrgyzstan – Laos – Latvia – Lebanon – Lesotho – Liberia – Libya – Lithuania – Luxembourg – Macau – Madagascar – Marshall Islands – Malawi – Malaysia – Mali – Malta – Mauritania – Mexico – Micronesia – Moldova – Mongolia – Montenegro – Morocco – Mozambique – Myanmar – Nauru – Namibia – Nepal – Netherlands – New Zealand – Nicaragua – Niger – Nigeria – North Korea – North Macedonia – Norway – Oman – Pakistan – Palau – Palestine – Panama – Papua New Guinea – Paraguay – Peru – Philippines – Poland – Portugal – Qatar – Romania – Russia – Rwanda – Samoa – Saudi Arabia – Senegal – Serbia – Seychelles – Singapore – Slovakia – Slovenia – Somalia – South Africa – Solomon Islands – South Korea – South Sudan – Spain – Sri Lanka – Sudan – Sweden – Switzerland – Syria – Taiwan – Tajikistan – Tanzania – Thailand – Togo – Tonga – Tunisia – Turkey – Turkmenistan – Tuvalu – Uganda – Ukraine – United Arab Emirates – United Kingdom – United States – Uruguay – Uzbekistan – Vanuatu – Venezuela – Vietnam – Yemen – Zambia – Zimbabwe Establishments and disestablishments categories Establishments – Disestablishments Works and introductions categories Works – Introductions – Works entering the public domain Wikimedia Commons has media related to 2020. ...more edit section Events by month 2020 January February March April May June July August September October November December 2019 January February March April May June July August September October November December 2018 January February March April May June July August September October November December 2017 January February March April May June July August September October November December 2016 January February March April May June July August September October November December 2015 January February March April May June July August September October November December 2014 January February March April May June July August September October November December 2013 January February March April May June July August September October November December 2012 January February March April May June July August September October November December 2011 January February March April May June July August September October November December 2010 January February March April May June July August September October November December 2009 January February March April May June July August September October November December 2008 January February March April May June July August September October November December 2007 January February March April May June July August September October November December 2006 January February March April May June July August September October November December 2005 January February March April May June July August September October November December 2004 January February March April May June July August September October November December 2003 January February March April May June July August September October November December 2002 January February March April May June July August September October November December 2001 January February March April May June July August September October November December 2000 January February March April May June July August September October November December 1999 January February March April May June July August September October November December 1998 January February March April May June July August September October November December 1997 January February March April May June July August September October November December 1996 January February March April May June July August September October November December 1995 January February March April May June July August September October November December 1994 July August September October November December Content listings Types Overviews Featured content Outlines Lists Portals Glossaries Categories Indices Spoken articles Topics Current events Reference Culture Geography Health History Mathematics Nature People Philosophy Religion Society Technology Places, people and times Academic disciplines Anniversaries today Countries and territories Timelines decades, centuries, and millennia Indices A–Z index Categories Dewey Decimal classes Library of Congress Classification Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Portal:Current_events&oldid=983964679" Categories: Portals with triaged subpages from October 2020 All portals 2020 by day Current events portal 2020 Current events History portals Hidden categories: Wikipedia pages protected against vandalism All portals with triaged subpages Portals with no named maintainer Portals with short description Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Portal Talk Variants Views Read View source View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Ænglisc العربية অসমীয়া Azərbaycanca تۆرکجه বাংলা Bân-lâm-gú Беларуская भोजपुरी Bikol Central Català Чӑвашла Cebuano Čeština Dansk डोटेली Ελληνικά Эрзянь Español Esperanto Estremeñu Euskara Eʋegbe فارسی Føroyskt Français Gaeilge Gaelg 贛語 ગુજરાતી 客家語/Hak-kâ-ngî 한국어 Հայերեն Hrvatski Bahasa Indonesia Interlingua Ирон IsiZulu Íslenska Kapampangan ქართული Қазақша Kurdî Ladino Latina Lëtzebuergesch Lietuvių Limburgs Magyar मैथिली മലയാളം मराठी مصرى مازِرونی Bahasa Melayu Minangkabau Монгол မြန်မာဘာသာ Dorerin Naoero Nederlands नेपाली नेपाल भाषा 日本語 Napulitano Нохчийн Occitan Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ភាសាខ្មែរ Piemontèis Polski Português Română Русский Scots Shqip Sicilianu සිංහල سنڌي Slovenčina Soomaaliga کوردی Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Sunda Suomi Svenska Tagalog தமிழ் Татарча/tatarça ไทย Тоҷикӣ ᏣᎳᎩ Українська اردو Vepsän kel’ Tiếng Việt Volapük Walon 文言 吴语 ייִדיש Yorùbá 粵語 Zeêuws 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 17 October 2020, at 09:51 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1613 ---- Tribune of the plebs - Wikipedia Tribune of the plebs From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia   (Redirected from Tribune of the Plebs) Jump to navigation Jump to search Ancient Roman political office Tribune of the plebs, tribune of the people or plebeian tribune (Latin: tribunus plebis) was the first office of the Roman state that was open to the plebeians, and was, throughout the history of the Republic, the most important check on the power of the Roman Senate and magistrates. These tribunes had the power to convene and preside over the Concilium Plebis (people's assembly); to summon the senate; to propose legislation; and to intervene on behalf of plebeians in legal matters; but the most significant power was to veto the actions of the consuls and other magistrates, thus protecting the interests of the plebeians as a class. The tribunes of the plebs were sacrosanct, meaning that any assault on their person was punishable by death. In imperial times, the powers of the tribunate were granted to the emperor as a matter of course, and the office itself lost its independence and most of its functions.[1] During the day the tribunes used to sit on the tribune benches on the Forum Romanum. Contents 1 Establishment of the tribunate 2 Powers of the tribunes 3 Limitations 4 History 4.1 The tribunes in the conflict of the orders 4.2 Erosion of the tribunician power at the end of the Republic 5 See also 6 Notes 7 External links Establishment of the tribunate[edit] The Secession of the People to the Mons Sacer, engraving by B. Barloccini, 1849. Fifteen years after the expulsion of the kings and establishment of the Roman Republic, the plebeians were burdened by the weight of crushing debt. A series of clashes between the people and the ruling patricians in 495 and 494 BC brought the plebeians to the brink of revolt, and there was talk of assassinating the consuls. Instead, on the advice of Lucius Sicinius Vellutus, the plebeians seceded en masse to the Mons Sacer (the Sacred Mount), a hill outside of Rome.[2] The senate dispatched Agrippa Menenius Lanatus, a former consul who was well liked by the plebeians, as an envoy. Menenius was well received, and told the fable of the belly and the limbs, likening the people to the limbs who chose not to support the belly, and thus starved themselves; just as the belly and the limbs, the city, he explained, could not survive without both the patricians and plebeians working in concert.[3] The plebeians agreed to negotiate for their return to the city; and their condition was that special tribunes should be appointed to represent the plebeians, and to protect them from the power of the consuls. No member of the senatorial class would be eligible for this office (in practice, this meant that only plebeians were eligible for the tribunate), and the tribunes should be sacrosanct; any person who laid hands on one of the tribunes would be outlawed, and the whole body of the plebeians entitled to kill such person without fear of penalty. The senate agreeing to these terms, the people returned to the city.[4] The first tribuni plebis were Lucius Albinius Paterculus and Gaius Licinius, appointed for the year 493 BC. Soon afterward, the tribunes themselves appointed Sicinius and two others as their colleagues.[4] The ancient sources indicate the tribunes may have originally been two or five in number. If the former, the college of tribunes was expanded to five in 470 BC. Either way, the college was increased to ten in 457 BC, and remained at this number throughout Roman history. They were assisted by two aediles plebis, or plebeian aediles. Only plebeians were eligible for these offices, although there were at least two exceptions.[5] Powers of the tribunes[edit] Although sometimes referred to as plebeian magistrates, the tribunes of the people, like the plebeian aediles, who were created at the same time, were technically not magistrates, as they were elected by the plebeian assembly alone. However, they functioned very much like magistrates of the Roman state. They could convene the concilium plebis, which was entitled to pass legislation affecting the plebeians alone (plebiscita), and beginning in 493 BC to elect the plebeian tribunes and aediles. From the institution of the tribunate, any one of the tribunes of the plebs was entitled to preside over this assembly. The tribunes were entitled to propose legislation before the assembly. By the third century BC, the tribunes also had the right to call the senate to order, and lay proposals before it.[1][6] Ius intercessionis, also called intercessio, the power of the tribunes to intercede on behalf of the plebeians and veto the actions of the magistrates, was unique in Roman history. Because they were not technically magistrates, and thus possessed no maior potestas, they relied on their sacrosanctity to obstruct actions unfavourable to the plebeians. Being sacrosanct, no person could harm the tribunes or interfere with their activities. To do so, or to disregard the veto of a tribune, was punishable by death, and the tribunes could order the death of persons who violated their sacrosanctity. This could be used as a protection when a tribune needed to arrest someone. This sacrosanctity also made the tribunes independent of all magistrates; no magistrate could veto the action of a tribune. If a magistrate, the senate, or any other assembly disregarded the orders of a tribune, he could "interpose the sacrosanctity of his person" to prevent such action. Only a dictator (or perhaps an interrex) was exempted from the veto power.[1] The tribunes could veto acts of the Roman senate. The tribune Tiberius Sempronius Gracchus imposed his veto on all government functions in 133 BC, when the senate attempted to block his agrarian reforms by imposing the veto of another tribune.[7] Tribunes also possessed the authority to enforce the right of provocatio ad populum, a precursor of the modern right of habeas corpus. This entitled a citizen to appeal the actions of a magistrate by shouting appello tribunos! ("I call upon the tribunes") or provoco ad populum! ("I appeal to the people").[8] Once invoked, this right required one of the tribunes to assess the situation, and determine the lawfulness of the magistrate's action. Any action taken in defiance of this right was illegal on its face. In effect, this gave the tribunes of the people unprecedented power to protect individuals from the arbitrary exercise of state power, and afforded Roman citizens a degree of liberty unequalled in the ancient world. If the tribune decided to act, he would impose his ius intercessionis ("right of intercession"). Limitations[edit] Although a tribune could veto any action of the magistrates, senate, or other assemblies, he had to be physically present in order to do so. Because the sacrosanctity of the tribunes depended on the oath of the plebeians to defend them, their powers were limited to the boundaries of the city of Rome. A tribune traveling abroad could not rely on his authority to intervene on behalf of the plebeians. For this reason, the activities of the tribunes were normally confined to the city itself, and a one-mile radius beyond.[1] History[edit] The tribunes in the conflict of the orders[edit] In 471 BC the Lex Publilia transferred the election of the tribunes from comitia curiata to the comitia tributa, thus removing the influence of the patricians on their election.[9] In 462, the tribune Gaius Terentillius Arsa alleged that the consular government had become even more oppressive than the monarchy that it had replaced. He urged the passage of a law appointing five commissioners to define and limit the powers of the consuls. By threat of war and plague, the issue was postponed for five contentious years, with the same college of tribunes elected each year. In 457, hoping to deprive the law's supporters of their impetus, the senate agreed to increase the number of tribunes to ten, provided that none of the tribunes from the preceding years should be re-elected.[10] However, the new tribunes continued to press for the adoption of Terentillus' law, until in 454 the senate agreed to appoint three commissioners to study Greek laws and institutions, and on their return help to resolve the strife between the orders. On the return of the envoys, the senate and the tribunes agreed to the appointment of a committee of ten men, known as the decemviri, or decemvirs, to serve for one year in place of the annual magistrates, and codify Roman law. The tribunate itself was suspended during this time. But when a second college of decemvirs appointed for the year 450 illegally continued their office into the following year, and the abuses of their authority became clear to the people, the decemvirate was abolished and the tribunate restored, together with the annual magistrates.[11] Among the laws codified by the decemvirs was one forbidding intermarriage between the patricians and the plebeians; the Twelve Tables of Roman law also codified that the consulate itself was closed to the plebeians. Worse still, in 448, two patricians were co-opted to fill vacant positions in the tribunate, although they proved to be of moderate views, and their year of office was peaceful. To prevent future attempts by the patricians to influence the selection of tribunes, Lucius Trebonius Asper promulgated a law forbidding the tribunes to co-opt their colleagues, and requiring their election to continue until all of the seats were filled. But relations between the orders deteriorated, until in 445, the tribunes, led by Gaius Canuleius, were able to push through a law permitting the intermarriage of patricians and plebeians, and allowing one of the consuls to be a plebeian.[12] Rather than permit the election of a plebeian consul, the senate resolved upon the election of military tribunes with consular power, who might be elected from either order. Initially this compromise satisfied the plebeians, but in practice only patricians were elected. The regular election of military tribunes in the place of consuls prevented any plebeians from assuming the highest offices of state until the year 400, when four of the six military tribunes were plebeians. Plebeian military tribunes served in 399, 396, 383, and 379, but in all other years between 444 and 376 BC, every consul or military tribune with consular powers was a patrician.[13] Beginning in 376, Gaius Licinius Calvus Stolo and Lucius Sextius Lateranus, tribunes of the plebs, used the veto power to prevent the election of any annual magistrates. Continuing in office each year, they frustrated the patricians, who, despite electing patrician military tribunes from 371 to 367, finally conceded the consulship, agreeing to the Licinian Rogations. Under this law, military tribunes with consular power were abolished, and one of the consuls elected each year was to be a plebeian. Although this law was occasionally violated by the election of two patrician consuls, Sextius himself was elected consul for 366, and Licinius in 364. At last, the plebeian tribunes had broken the patrician monopoly on the highest magistracies of the state.[14][15][16] Following their victory in 367, the tribunes remained an important check on the power of the senate and the annual magistrates. In 287 BC, the senate formally recognized the plebiscita as laws with binding force.[1] In 149 BC, men elected to the tribunate automatically entered the Senate. Erosion of the tribunician power at the end of the Republic[edit] However, in 81 BC, the dictator Sulla, who considered the tribunate a threat to his power, deprived the tribunes of their powers to initiate legislation, and to veto acts of the senate. He also prohibited former tribunes from holding any other office, effectively preventing the use of the tribunate as a stepping stone to higher office. Although the tribunes retained the power to intercede on behalf of individual citizens, most of their authority was lost under Sulla's reforms.[17] Former tribunes were once again admitted to the annual magistracies beginning in 75 BC, and the tribunician authority was fully restored by the consuls Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus and Marcus Licinius Crassus in 70.[1] The dignity of the office was further impaired when, in 59 BC, the patrician Publius Clodius Pulcher, who aspired to hold the tribunician power, had himself adopted by a plebeian youth, and renounced his patrician status, in order to be elected tribune for the following year. Although considered outrageous at the time, Clodius' scheme was allowed to proceed, and he embarked on a program of legislation designed to outlaw his political opponents and confiscate their property, while realizing a substantial gain from his actions.[18][19][20] In 48 BC, the senate bestowed the tribunicia potestas (tribunician power) on the dictator Gaius Julius Caesar, who, as a patrician, was ineligible to be elected one of the tribunes. When two of the elected tribunes attempted to obstruct his actions, Caesar had them impeached, and taken before the senate, where they were deprived of their powers. Never again did Caesar face opposition from the tribunes; he held the tribunician power until his death in 44.[21] In 23 BC, the senate bestowed the tribunician power on Caesar's nephew, Octavian, now styled Augustus. From this point, the tribunicia potestas became a pre-requisite for the emperors, most of whom received it from the senate upon claiming the throne, though some had already received this power during the reigns of their predecessors; the granting of this authority was a means of designating a favoured member of the imperial court as the emperor's intended successor. Agrippa, Drusus the Younger, Tiberius, Titus, Trajan, and Marcus Aurelius each received the tribunician power in this way. With the regular assumption of the tribunician power by the emperors and their heirs, the ancient authority of the tribunes dwindled away.[22] Although the office of tribune endured throughout imperial times, its independence and most of its practical functions were lost. Together with the aedileship, it remained a step in the political career of many plebeians who aspired to sit in the senate, at least until the third century. There is evidence that the tribunate continued to exist as late as the fifth century AD.[1] See also[edit] List of Tribune of the Plebs Notes[edit] ^ a b c d e f g Oxford Classical Dictionary, 2nd Ed. (1970), "Tribuni Plebis." ^ Titus Livius, Ab Urbe Condita ii. 23–32. ^ Titus Livius, Ab Urbe Condita ii. 32. ^ a b Titus Livius, Ab Urbe Condita ii. 33. ^ Livy, Ab urbe condita, ii. 33, 58 (citing Piso, iii. 31. ^ Frank Frost Abbott, A History and Description of Roman Political Institutions, Ginn & Co., 1901, pp. 196, 261. ^ Plutarchus, Lives of the Noble Greeks and Romans Tiberius Gracchus. ^ See the use of both forms by Volero in Livy's account.Livy (1880). Ab urbe condita. 2.55.5.CS1 maint: location (link) ^ Livy, Ab urbe condita, ii. 58. ^ Titus Livius, Ab Urbe Condita iii. 8–31. ^ Titus Livius, Ab Urbe Condita iii. 32–55. ^ Titus Livius, Ab Urbe Condita iv. 1–6. ^ Titus Livius, Ab Urbe Condita iv. 6. ff, v. 12. ff. ^ Titus Livius, Ab Urbe Condita vi. 35, 36, 38, 42, vii. 1, 2. ^ Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Romaike Archaiologia xiv. 12. ^ Plutarchus, Lives of the Noble Greeks and Romans "Life of Camillus." ^ Frank Frost Abbott, A History and Description of Roman Political Institutions, Ginn & Co., 1901, p. 105 ^ Marcus Tullius Cicero, Pro Domo Sua 13; De Haruspicum Responsis 27. ^ Plutarchus, Lives of the Noble Greeks and Romans "Life of Cicero." ^ H.J. Haskell, This was Cicero (1924), pp. 200–201. ^ Frank Frost Abbott, A History and Description of Roman Political Institutions, Ginn & Co., 1901, p. 135 ^ Michael Grant, The Roman Emperors (1985), pp. 13, 20, 56. External links[edit] Media related to Tribune of the Plebs at Wikimedia Commons v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films Authority control GND: 4188558-2 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tribune_of_the_plebs&oldid=996494129" Categories: Cursus honorum Ancient Roman titles Tribunes of the plebs 1st-millennium BC introductions Hidden categories: CS1 maint: location Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata Articles containing Latin-language text Commons category link from Wikidata Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Languages Afrikaans العربية Azərbaycanca Български Català Čeština Deutsch Eesti Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français 한국어 Հայերեն Bahasa Indonesia Italiano Latina Magyar Nederlands 日本語 Polski Português Русский Simple English Slovenčina Українська Edit links This page was last edited on 26 December 2020, at 23:06 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1619 ---- Wikipedia:Community portal - Wikipedia Wikipedia:Community portal From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Place to find collaborations, tasks, and news about Wikimedia Community portal Dashboard Departments Maintenance Tasks Discord IRC Meetups Directories (Policies/Guidelines Essays How-to Index Noticeboards WikiProjects) Welcome to the Community portal! Shortcuts P:WP WP:COM This page provides a listing of current collaborations, tasks, and news about English Wikipedia. New to Wikipedia? See the contributing to Wikipedia page or our tutorial for everything you need to know to get started. For a listing of internal project pages of interest, see the department directory. Interact more For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the Dashboard. Help desk Ask questions about how to use or edit Wikipedia The Teahouse Friendly help for newcomers Reference desk Ask research questions about any topic except Wikipedia itself WikiProjects Work with other editors on a shared area of interest Dispute resolution Get help resolving disputes Village pump sections (view all) Policy Discuss existing and proposed policies Technical Discuss technical issues about Wikipedia Proposals Discuss new proposals that are not policy-related Idea lab Incubate new ideas before formally proposing them WMF Discuss issues involving the Wikimedia Foundation Miscellaneous Post messages that do not fit into any other category Help out You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Task Center for brief guides.) Fix spelling and grammar Samsung Knox Bizim Hikaye Gursarai More (K/DA song) Suzhou Museum More... • Learn how Fix wikilinks North East New Territories New Development Areas Planning Les Platons Gigia Talarico Pakistan Army Ministry of Innovation and Technology (Ethiopia) More... • Learn how Update with new information Mind Master Pepsi Music Festival Tim Sauter Tara Mira Extinction risk from climate change More... • Learn how Expand short articles Ministry of Public Health (Uzbekistan) Kalpak Osmondagi bolalar Delighted by You Uzbekistan National News Agency More... • Learn how Check and add references Railway stations in Angola Prof (rapper) Mixed autoimmune hemolytic anemia Birkin bag Scottish National Party More... • Learn how Fix original research issues Stephenville North and South Texas Railway I, Robot (film) History of basketball Dick & Dom in da Bungalow Eliezer Berkovits More... • Learn how Improve lead sections Silicon Knights Rory McAllister (footballer) Obligate nasal breathing Spottee Pediatric plastic surgery More... • Learn how Add an image National Highway 11 (India) Noumboulo Nelson Mandela Bay Metropolitan Municipality Norma Triangle National Archives of Korea More... • Learn how Translate and clean up 2014 Kazakh Senate election Iškuza 2018 Colombian Census Klootschieten Punjab More... • Learn how Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women. Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality. Community bulletin board This section is transcluded from Wikipedia:Community bulletin board. (edit | history) Page used for announcements towards the community members of the project 28 December 2020   News and notes: Year-end legal surprises cause concern, but Public Domain Day is imminent In the media: Concealment, data journalism, a non-pig farmer, and some Bluetick Hounds Arbitration report: 2020 election results Opinion: How to make your factory's safety and labor issues disappear Featured content: Very nearly ringing in the New Year with "Blank Space" – but we got there in time. Traffic report: 2020 wraps up News from the WMF: What Wikipedia saw during election week in the U.S., and what we’re doing next Recent research: Predicting the next move in Wikipedia discussions Essay: Subjective importance Op-Ed: An unforgettable year we might wish to forget Gallery: Angels in the architecture Humour: 'Twas the Night Before Wikimas Single page Front page About Subscribe Suggestions Archives This week's article for improvement is: Fishing industry Previous selections: Edible · Christmas ham · Bengali cuisine This week's backlog of the week is: Wikipedia:Peer review/List of active reviews Active Wiki Fixup Projects Article Rescue Squadron Check Wikipedia Cleanup Dead-end pages Disambig pages w/ links Fix common mistakes Free images to Commons Geo-coordinates Missing articles Most-wanted articles Notability Orphaned articles Red Link Recovery Reliability Requested articles Single editor Spell check Stubsensor Articles for improvement Uncategorised articles Unreferenced articles Wikification needed Main · Inactive · Mini v t e General notices Stay up to date with what's happening on Wikipedia. The new issue of The Signpost is out now. Wikipedia Pages Wanting Photos (WPWP), an annual campaign in which Wikipedians across language projects and communities add photos to articles, has started (prizes!). Do you have need for a specialized script that doesn't exist yet, or have an idea for a cool new script or gadget? Post requests and ideas at Wikipedia:User scripts/Requests. Projects seeking help Also consider posting WikiProject, Task Force, and Collaboration news at the Signpost's WikiProject Report page. WikiProjects and Task Forces The Wikipedia Help Project seeks assistance expanding and improving the Task Center and other pages within the Help namespace. WikiProject Abandoned Drafts Stale draft drive. An ongoing drive dedicated to reducing the amount of stale user space drafts. Options are to delete, redirect, move to mainspace or blank. Stop by and help the drive out! WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia is looking for people who are interested in helping out in our project to get our articles into an audio format that can be used for any number of uses including, but not limited to, visually impaired or people who just prefer to listen to the article instead of reading it for whatever reason they choose. You can sign up here on our participant's page. We are also in need of native or fluent speakers so that everything is pronounced properly. You can sign up for the Pronunciation task force by adding your name as well as your languages of fluency to section 2. Technical news Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available. Tech News Because of the holidays the next issue of Tech News will be sent out on 11 January 2021. Recent changes The {{citation needed}} template shows when a statement in a Wikipedia article needs a source. If you click on it when you edit with the visual editor there is a popup that explains this. Now it can also show the reason and when it was added. [1] Changes later this week There is no new MediaWiki version this week or next week. Future changes You can propose and discuss what technical improvements should be done for geographic information. This could be coordinates, maps or other related things. Some wikis use LanguageConverter to switch between writing systems or variants of a language. This can only be done for the entire page. There will be a tag that can convert a piece of text on a page. [2] Oversighters and stewards can hide entries in Special:AbuseLog. They can soon hide multiple entries at once using checkboxes. This works like hiding normal edits. It will happen in early January. [3] Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. Wikiproject/Group editing activities and efforts Monthly projects and group efforts Guild of Copy Editors' editing drive. The January 2021 Backlog Drive is a one-month-long effort of the Guild of Copy Editors to reduce the backlog of articles that require copy editing; those carrying the {{copy edit}} tag (also {{awkward}}, {{copy edit section}}, {{inappropriate person}}, and {{copy edit inline}} and their redirects) or listed on the GOCE Requests page. Signups are now open. WikiProject: Women in Red: Women writers & their works, September 2020. In September, Women in Red is once again focusing on women writers and their works from around the world. Although we welcome the creation of articles on any of the notable women writers around the world, we would like to include some of those associated in one way or another with World War II, It has also been suggested we should give attention to those involved in TV or radio and to those from non-English speaking countries whose works have been translated into English or have led to films distributed around the world. Ongoing The AfroCine Project invites you to join us again this October and November, the two months which are dedicated to improving content about the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.(awarding prizes to different categories of winners:) The 100,000 Challenge. The quest to bring about 100,000 article improvements and creations globally through a series of 50,000/10,000/1000 Challenges for different regions and countries. This is a loose challenge, a list will not be maintained here, but the components will function independently on each of the subpages. Will be updated every week or two. The 50,000 Destubbing Challenge is a long term challenge to destub 50,000 articles on English Wikipedia for every country and topic. It may take decades to accomplish, it may take ten years, it all depends on how many people actively contribute. Page used for announcements towards the community members of the project Wikipedia:WikiCup. The WikiCup is a championship that has taken place every year on Wikipedia since 2007. The Cup is played and won by skill of editing. The purpose of the Cup is to encourage content creation and improvement and make editing on Wikipedia more fun. There is a new round every month, until the current contest ends; below are the details. May 1 to June 28 – 32 contestants left. July 1 to August 29 – 16 contestants left. September 1 to October 31 – 8 finalists left, the contestant with the highest score will win! Women in Red editing drive, BLM/Anti-discrimination, July – December 2020. From July to December 2020, as a result of the rapid development of interest in Black Lives Matter (BLM) and anti-discrimination, we have decided to embark on an editathon over an extended period. It complements WikiProject Black Lives Matter's June, July, and August editathons. Women in Red: #1day1woman | 2020. For anyone interested in creating or improving articles on women and their works outside the specific focus of our monthly editathons. We have called it #1day1woman as the label can be used worldwide on the social media, creating new trends of interest. Perfectionists might like to create a new article each and every day but one new article on any one day will be the starting point. The virtual edit-a-thon allows enthusiasts from around the globe to participate in the work. The lists of redlinks should provide inspiration. There is a section where you can list the articles you create this month, and another section where you can add the images you uploaded to Commons. This essay on creating women's biographies and our Ten Simple Rules might be helpful to newcomers. Monthly contest, WikiProject Military history. The contest department of the Military history WikiProject aims to motivate increased quality in military history articles by offering a form of friendly competition for project members making improvements to them. The primary contest available is a simple rolling competition that awards points for improving articles. The contest runs from the first to last day of each month. WikiProject Medicine Collaboration of the Month. Every month, a topic will be selected from this page that will be the focus of editing for some members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine. The article may or may not yet exist. Topics may either relate to medical basic sciences (anatomy, biochemistry, and so on), or clinical medicine (illnesses, surgical procedures, and so on). Upcoming Remote Events and Current Initiatives Discussions and collaborations Centralized discussion Village pumps:policy•tech•proposals•idea lab•WMF•misc Procedure for proposing blank-and-redirect How to refer to subjects when previous works credit them under a deadname meta: Initiatives of recommendations For a listing of ongoing discussions, see the dashboard. view edit history watch archive talk purge Discussions in the following areas have requested wider attention via Requests for comment: Biographies Economy and trade History and geography Language and linguistics Media, the arts, and architecture Politics, government, and law Religion and philosophy Science and mathematics Society, sports, and culture Wikipedia policies and guidelines Wikipedia style and naming WikiProjects and collaborations Wikipedia technical issues and templates Wikipedia proposals Unsorted See also Dashboard News Goings-on Meetups In the media Mailing lists Newest featured content Articles Portsmouth War Memorial 2018 EFL League Two play-off Final John Young (astronaut) 2006 Football League Championship play-off Final Warner Bros. Movie World Scorpion Kaikhosru Shapurji Sorabji Laguna del Maule (volcano) Sonic the Hedgehog Battle of Powick Bridge 55th (West Lancashire) Infantry Division Portrait of a Musician Apollo 7 Battle of Vrbanja Bridge John Neal (writer) Topics Ships of the Royal Yugoslav Navy Punic Wars Operas by Claudio Monteverdi Naruto volumes Silesian Wars 1st Army Group (Kingdom of Yugoslavia) Nashville Sounds Overview of Margaret Battleships of Japan Ian Fleming's James Bond novels and short stories Crécy campaign RAAF area commands Jessica Chastain Gascon campaign of 1345 Cleopatra Lists Avisos of Germany Operas by Carl Maria von Weber Dimple Kapadia filmography Billboard number-one country songs of 1949 Dayahang Rai filmography Xevious media Burnley F.C. managers Odonata species of Slovenia World Heritage Sites in Belarus What Would You Do? episodes Plant genus names (D–K) Awards and nominations received by The West Wing Burnley F.C. seasons Amphibians of Texas Ryan Reynolds filmography Pictures Valerie Thomas Nassau grouper Mistletoebird Svan peasant State Fair poster Crankset Fumarole formation of tazieffite acicular crystals The Fortune Teller poster Wesley Bell Collapse of Arecibo Telescope Himalayan salt Acanthemblemaria spinosa The Interior of the Palm House on the Pfaueninsel Near Potsdam Entrance hall of the Eureka Inn Kaʻiulani Tip of the day Tip of the day... Help test the MediaWiki software The MediaWiki software that runs Wikipedia is under constant development. Do you want to see the latest, greatest features? Then head over to test.wikipedia.org, where the development branch is tested. But be careful. That wiki runs in debugging mode, so even the smallest problem in the code might cause it to spew out error messages. Take a look at the list of features under development in the MediaWiki roadmap. MediaWiki already is one of the most feature-rich wiki engines; see the MediaWiki feature list. MediaWiki and its dependencies are open source, so if you are the inquisitive type, please take a look at the code and help improve it. Prior tip – Tips library – Next tip Read more: test.wikipedia.org   Become a Wikipedia tipster To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{totd}} Find out more on Wikipedia's Sister projects Media from Commons Species directories from Wikispecies Travel guides from Wikivoyage News stories from Wikinews Definitions from Wiktionary Textbooks from Wikibooks Quotations from Wikiquote Source texts from Wikisource Learning resources from Wikiversity Data from Wikidata v t e Wikipedia Overview (outline) Censorship Citation needed Conflict-of-interest editing Criticism gender bias ideological bias racial bias Deletionism and inclusionism "Ignore all rules" MediaWiki Notability Reliability Vandalism Predictions of the project's end Community Administrators AfroCrowd Arbitration Committee Art+Feminism Bots Lsjbot Edit-a-thon List of Wikipedias The Signpost Wikipedian in residence WikiConference North America Wikimania WikiProject Women in Red People Florence Devouard Sue Gardner James Heilman Katherine Maher Magnus Manske Erik Möller Ira Brad Matetsky Larry Sanger María Sefidari Lila Tretikov Jimmy Wales Wikipedians Wikimedian of the Year History Bomis Logo Controversies U.S. Congressional staff edits Essjay controversy Seigenthaler biography incident Henryk Batuta hoax Jar'Edo Wens hoax Internet Watch Foundation Scientology Italian Wikipedia blackout English Wikipedia blackout Hillsborough Wikipedia posts MyWikiBiz VisualEditor #1Lib1Ref Coverage of American politics Response to the COVID-19 pandemic Honors 2008 Quadriga award Wikipedia Monument 2015 Erasmus Prize 2015 Princess of Asturias Award References and analysis Cultural Bibliography Films Academic studies Listen to Wikipedia Wiki-Watch Wikipediocracy WikiScanner Wikipedia Review Mobile access Apps QRpedia Wapedia WikiNodes Wikipedia Zero Wikiwand Content use Books LLC Boundless (company) DBpedia Deletionpedia Kiwix WikiReader Science information Health information Similar projects Interpedia Nupedia Citizendium Enciclopedia Libre Universal en Español Everipedia Veropedia List of online encyclopedias List of wikis Related Wikimedia Foundation Wikimedia movement The Iraq War: A Historiography of Wikipedia Changelogs Print Wikipedia Magna Carta (An Embroidery) 274301 Wikipedia Viola wikipedia List Category v t e Wikipedia editor navigation v t e Wikipedia key policies and guidelines (?) Five pillars Ignore all rules Content (?) P Verifiability No original research Neutral point of view What Wikipedia is not Biographies of living persons Copyright (Copyright violations) Image use Article titles G Notability Autobiography Citing sources Reliable sources medicine Do not include copies of lengthy primary sources Plagiarism Don't create hoaxes Fringe theories Patent nonsense External links Conduct (?) P Civility Consensus Harassment Vandalism Ignore all rules No personal attacks Ownership of content Edit warring Dispute resolution Sockpuppetry No legal threats Child protection Paid-contribution disclosure G Assume good faith Conflict of interest Disruptive editing Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point Etiquette Gaming the system Please do not bite the newcomers Courtesy vanishing Responding to threats of harm Talk page guidelines Signatures Deletion (?) P Deletion policy Proposed deletion Biographies Books Criteria for speedy deletion Attack page Oversight Revision deletion Enforcement (?) P Administrators Banning Blocking Page protection Editing (?) P Editing policy G Article size Be bold Disambiguation Hatnotes Broad-concept article Understandability Style Manual of Style Contents Accessibility Dates and numbers Images Layout Lead section Linking Lists Classification Categories, lists, and navigation templates Categorization Template namespace Project content (?) G Project namespace WikiProjects User pages User boxes Shortcuts Subpages WMF (?) P Terms of Use List of policies Friendly space policy Licensing and copyright Privacy policy List of all policies and guidelines P: List of policies G: List of guidelines Summaries of values and principles v t e Manual of Style Overview Directory Tips Quiz Content Accessibility Biographies Disambiguation pages Infoboxes Linking Self-references Words to watch Formatting Abbreviations Capitalization Dates and numbers Pronunciation Proper names Spelling Text formatting Titles Images Captions Galleries Icons Images Layout Layout Lead section Tables Trivia sections Lists Embedded lists Lists Lists of works Road junctions Stand-alone lists Legal Legal Trademarks Arts Anime and manga Comics Film Lyrics and poetry Novels Television Video games Visual arts Writing about fiction Music Music Music samples Record charts Regional Canada China France Hawaii India Ireland Japan Korea Malaysia Philippines Poland Singapore Trinidad and Tobago Religion Islam Latter Day Saints Science Chemistry Computer commands Mathematics Medicine Taxonomy Sports Cue sports Snooker Related Article size Article titles Categories, lists, and navigation templates Categorization Citing sources Hatnotes Military history Signatures Subpages Talk page guidelines Template namespace Understandability User pages Wikimedia sister projects WikiProjects Search Book Category v t e Wikipedia accounts and governance Unregistered (IP) users Why create an account? Create an account Request an account IPs are human too IP addresses are not people IP hopper Registered users New account Logging in Reset passwords Username policy Changing username Usernames for administrator attention Unified login or SUL Alternate account Account security Password strength requirements User account security Personal security practices Two-factor authentication 2FA for AWB Committed identity On privacy, confidentiality and discretion Compromised accounts Blocks, bans, sanctions, global actions Blocking policy FAQ Admins guide Tools Autoblock Appealing a block Guide to appealing blocks UTRS Unblock Ticket Request System Blocking IP addresses Range blocks IPv6 Open proxies Banning policy ArbCom appeals Sanctions Personal sanctions General sanctions Discretionary sanctions and Log Essay Long-term abuse Standard offer Global actions Related to accounts Sockpuppetry Single-purpose account Sleeper account Vandalism-only account Wikibreak Enforcer Retiring Courtesy vanishing Clean start Quiet return User groups and global user groups Requests for permissions Admin instructions Admin guide Account creator PERM (Auto) confirmed PERM Autopatrolled PERM AutoWikiBrowser PERM Bot Request Edit filter helper Request Event coordinator PERM Extended confirmed PERM File mover PERM IP block exempt Request Mass message sender PERM New page reviewer PERM Page mover PERM Pending changes reviewer PERM Rollback PERM Template editor PERM Global rights policy OTRS Volunteer Response Team Advanced user groups Administrator RfA Bureaucrat RfB CheckUser and Oversight Request Edit filter manager Request Interface administrator Request Founder Importer Researcher Committees and related Arbitration Committee Bot approvals group Functionaries Clerks SPI clerks ArbCom clerks Governance Administration FAQ Formal organization Editorial oversight and control Quality control Wikimedia Foundation Board Founder's seat Meta-Wiki WikiProjects Elections Policies and guidelines Petitions Noticeboards Consensus Dispute resolution Reforms v t e Wikipedia community For a listing of current collaborations, tasks, and news, see the Community portal. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the Dashboard. General community topics Administration News The Signpost Goings-on In the media Meetups Mailing lists Wikipedians Statistics Milestones The Wikipedia Library Centralized discussion Village pump Idea lab Policy Proposals Technical Miscellaneous WMF Bots Contents and grading Requested articles Most-wanted articles Images needing articles Articles needing images Articles for creation WP:AFC/R Creation Help Vital articles Articles for improvement Peer review Good article nominations Featured article candidates Lists Pictures Topics Article translation Pages Main Page Errors WikiProjects and collaborations Directory Culture and the arts Geographical History and society Science, technology and engineering Wikipedia assistance and tasks Patrols Recent changes Counter-Vandalism Unit Version 1.0 Editorial Team Accessibility Organizations category Awards and feedback Reward board Contests A nice cup of tea and a sit down Charitableness WikiLove Compliment before criticism Kindness Campaign Thanks! Maintenance tasks Task Center Open tasks Backlog Category Admin category Edit requests Category Database reports Category tracker Dusty articles Special pages New pages Recent changes Controversial issues Administrators and noticeboards Administrators' noticeboard Incidents Edit warring Vandalism Admin dashboard Admin requests Closure Page protection User permissions Sockpuppets Open proxies Revision deletion Oversight Request Usernames Changing Title blacklist OTRS Bureaucrats' Requests for adminship and bureaucratship Arbitration Committee Requests Enforcement Content dispute resolution Editor assistance Requests for comment Third opinion Dispute resolution noticeboard Biographies of living persons Conflict of interest External links Fringe theories Neutral point of view No original research Reliable sources Other noticeboards and assistance Regional notice boards Requests for help Category Asking questions Teahouse Help desk Reference desk Adopt-a-user Copyright assistance Copyright investigations Text problems Media questions Resource requests Mergers History mergers Moves Page importation Spam Blacklist Whitelist Bots Education New pages patrol General sanctions Editor sanctions Long-term abuse Deletion discussions Guide Admin Today Articles Templates Files Categories Redirects Miscellany Speedy Proposed BLP Books Review Undeletion Arguments to avoid Arguments to make Article Rescue Elections and votings Requests for comment (meta) Wikimedia Foundation elections WP Democracy Voting is not evil Milestones Directories and indexes and summaries Departments Edit summary legend Editor's index Essays FAQs Glossary Abbreviations Help Manual of Style Simplified Rules Five pillars Policies Guidelines Shortcuts Templates Citation templates Tips Today Tools Wikis Wiki markup Media Category Templates v t e Wikipedia essays Essays on building, editing, and deleting content Philosophy Articles must be written All Five Pillars are the same height Avoid vague introductions Be a reliable source Civil POV pushing Cohesion Competence is required Concede lost arguments Dissent is not disloyalty Don't lie Don't search for objections Editing Wikipedia is like visiting a foreign country Editors will sometimes be wrong Eight simple rules for editing our encyclopedia Explanationism External criticism of Wikipedia Here to build an encyclopedia Most ideas are bad Need Neutrality of sources Not editing because of Wikipedia restriction The one question Oversimplification Paradoxes Paraphrasing POV and OR from editors, sources, and fields Process is important Product, process, policy Purpose Reasonability rule Systemic bias There is no seniority Ten Simple Rules for Editing Wikipedia Tendentious editing The role of policies in collaborative anarchy The rules are principles Trifecta Wikipedia in brief Wikipedia is an encyclopedia Wikipedia is a community Construction 100K featured articles Acronym overkill Advanced source searching Adding images improves the encyclopedia Advanced article editing Advanced table formatting Advanced template coding Advanced text formatting Alternatives to the "Expand" template Amnesia test A navbox on every page An unfinished house is a real problem Articles have a half-life Autosizing images Avoid mission statements Bare URLs Be neutral in form Beef up that first revision Blind men and an elephant BOLD, revert, discuss cycle Build content to endure Cherrypicking Chesterton's fence Children's lit, adult new readers, & large-print books Citation overkill Citation underkill Common-style fallacy Concept cloud Creating controversial content Criticisms of society may be consistent with NPOV and reliability Deprecated sources Dictionaries as sources Don't demolish the house while it's still being built Don't get hung up on minor details Don't hope the house will build itself Don't panic Don't revert due solely to "no consensus" Don't teach the controversy Editing on mobile devices Editors are not mindreaders Encourage the newcomers Endorsements (commercial) Featured articles may have problems Fruit of the poisonous tree Give an article a chance Identifying and using independent sources History sources Law sources Primary sources Science sources Style guides Tertiary sources Ignore STRONGNAT for date formats Inaccuracies in Wikipedia namespace Inaccuracy Introduction to structurism Link rot Mine a source Merge Test Minors and persons judged incompetent "Murder of" articles Not every story/event/disaster needs a biography Not everything needs a navbox Not everything needs a WikiProject Nothing is in stone Organizing disambiguation pages by subject area Permastub Potential, not just current state Principle of some astonishment Printability Pruning article revisions Publicists Put a little effort into it Restoring part of a reverted edit Robotic editing Sham consensus Specialized-style fallacy Stub Makers Run an edit-a-thon Temporary versions of articles Tertiary-source fallacy There is a deadline There is no deadline The deadline is now Understanding Wikipedia's content standards Walled garden What an article should not include Wikipedia is a work in progress Wikipedia is not a reliable source Wikipedia is not being written in an organized fashion The world will not end tomorrow Write the article first Writing better articles Writing Avoid thread mode Gender-neutral language Proseline Use feminine pronouns Write the article first Writing about women Writing better articles Deletion Adjectives in your recommendations AfD is not a war zone Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions Arguments to avoid in deletion reviews Arguments to avoid in image deletion discussions Arguments to make in deletion discussions Avoid repeated arguments Before commenting in a deletion discussion But there must be sources! Confusing arguments mean nothing Content removal Counting and sorting are not original research Delete the junk Does deletion help? Don't confuse stub status with non-notability Don't overuse shortcuts to policy and guidelines to win your argument Follow the leader How to save an article proposed for deletion I just don't like it Identifying blatant advertising Identifying test edits Immunity Keep it concise Liar liar pants on fire Nothing Nothing is clear Overzealous deletion Relisting can be abusive Relist bias The Heymann Standard Unopposed AFD discussion Wikipedia is not Whack-A-Mole Why was the page I created deleted? What to do if your article gets tagged for speedy deletion When in doubt, hide it in the woodwork No Encyclopedic Use Essays on civility The basics Accepting other users Apology Contributing to complicated discussions Divisiveness Encouraging the newcomers Enjoy yourself Expect no thanks High-functioning autism and Asperger's editors How to be civil Maintaining a friendly space Negotiation Obsessive–compulsive disorder editors Relationships with academic editors Thank you Too long; didn't read Truce Unblock perspectives Philosophy A weak personal attack is still wrong Advice for hotheads An uncivil environment is a poor environment Be the glue Beware of the tigers! Civility warnings Deletion as revenge Failure Forgive and forget It's not the end of the world Nobody cares Most people who disagree with you on content are not vandals Old-fashioned Wikipedian values Profanity, civility, and discussions Revert notification opt-out Shadowless Fists of Death! Staying cool when the editing gets hot The grey zone The last word There is no Divine Right Of Editors Most ideas are bad Nothing is clear The rules of polite discourse There is no common sense Wikipedia is not about winning Writing for the opponent Reader Dos Argue better Assume good faith Assume the assumption of good faith Assume no clue Avoid personal remarks Avoid the word "vandal" Be excellent to one another Beyond civility Call a spade a spade Candor Deny recognition Desist Discussing cruft Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass Encourage full discussions Get over it How to lose Imagine others complexly Just drop it Keep it down to earth Mind your own business Say "MOBY" No Nazis Read before commenting Don'ts Civil POV pushing Cyberbullying Don't accuse someone of a personal attack for accusing of a personal attack Don't be a fanatic Don't be a jerk Don't be an ostrich Don't be ashamed Don't be a WikiBigot Don't be high-maintenance Don't be inconsiderate Don't be obnoxious Don't be prejudiced Don't be rude Don't call a spade a spade Don't call the kettle black Don't call things cruft Don't come down like a ton of bricks Don't cry COI Don't drink the consensus Kool-Aid Don't eat the troll's food Don't fight fire with fire Don't give a fuck Don't help too much Don't make a smarmy valediction part of your signature Don't remind others of past misdeeds Don't shout Don't spite your face Don't take the bait Don't template the regulars Don't throw your toys out of the pram Do not insult the vandals Griefing Nationalist editing No angry mastodons just madmen No, you can't have a pony Passive aggression Please don't bite the newcomers POV railroad There are no oracles You can't squeeze blood from a turnip WikiRelations WikiBullying WikiCrime WikiHarassment WikiHate WikiLawyering WikiLove WikiPeace Essays on notability Advanced source searching All high schools can be notable Alternative outlets Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions Articles with a single source Avoid template creep Bare notability Big events make key participants notable Bombardment Businesses with a single location But it's true! Citation overkill Common sourcing mistakes Clones Coatrack Discriminate vs indiscriminate information Every snowflake is unique Existence ≠ Notability Existence does not prove notability Extracting the meaning of significant coverage Fart Google searches and numbers High Schools Inclusion is not an indicator of notability Independent sources Inherent notability Insignificant Masking the lack of notability Make stubs News coverage does not decrease notability No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability No big loss No one cares about your garage band No one really cares Notability/Historical/Arguments Notability cannot be purchased Notability comparison test Notability is not a level playing field Notability is not a matter of opinion Notability is not relevance or reliability Notability means impact Notability points Notability sub-pages Notabilitymandering Not every single thing Donald Trump does deserves an article Obscurity ≠ Lack of notability Offline sources One hundred words One sentence does not an article make Other stuff exists Overreliance upon Google Perennial websites Pokémon test Read the source Run-of-the-mill Significant coverage not required Solutions are mixtures and nothing else Subjective importance Third-party sources Trivial mentions Video links Vanispamcruftisement What is and is not routine coverage What notability is not What to include Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause Humorous essays Anti-Wikipedian Asshole John rule Assume bad faith Assume faith Assume good wraith Assume stupidity Assume that everyone's assuming good faith, assuming that you are assuming good faith Avoid using preview button Avoid using wikilinks Bad Jokes and Other Non Deleted Nonsense BOLD, revert, revert, revert Boston Tea Party Barnstaritis Don't stuff beans up your nose Don't-give-a-fuckism Edits Per Day Editsummarisis Emerson Seven Ages of Editor, by Will E. Spear-Shake Go ahead, vandalize How many Wikipedians does it take to change a lightbulb? How to put up a straight pole by pushing it at an angle Is that even an essay? Newcomers are delicious, so go ahead and bite them Legal vandalism LTTAUTMAOK No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man Oops Defense Please be a giant dick, so we can ban you Please bite the newbies R-e-s-p-e-c-t Reducing consensus to an algorithm Requests for medication Requirements for adminship Rouge admin Rouge editor Sarcasm is really helpful Sausages for tasting The Night After Wikimas The first rule of Wikipedia The Five Pillars of Untruth Things that should not be surprising The WikiBible Watchlistitis Why not create an account? About essays About essays Essay guide Value of essays Difference between policies, guidelines and essays Don't cite essays as if they were policy Avoid writing redundant essays Finding an essay Quote your own essay Policies and guidelines About policies and guidelines Policies Guidelines How to contribute to Wikipedia guidance Policy writing is hard Wikipedia help pages Visit the Teahouse or the Help desk for an interactive Q & A forum. FAQs (?) Reference desks (?) Noticeboards (?) Cheatsheet (?) Directories (?) About Wikipedia (?) Administration Purpose Principles Policies and guidelines What Wikipedia is not Disclaimer (parental advice) Making requests Who writes Wikipedia? Help for readers (?) FAQ Books Copyright Glossary Mobile access Navigation Other languages Searching Students Viewing media Contributing to Wikipedia (?) Advice for young editors Avoiding common mistakes Etiquette Simplified Manual of Style Simplified rule-set "Ignore all rules" "The rules are principles" Style-tips Tip of the day Your first article (article wizard) Getting started (?) Why create an account? Introductions by topic The Wikipedia Adventure Graphics tutorials Picture tutorial IRC (live chat) tutorial VisualEditor user guide Dos and don'ts (?) Accessibility Biographies Biographies (living) Categorization Consensus Discussions Disambiguation Images Leads Links Lists References Tables Titles (of articles) How-to pages and information pages (?) Appealing blocks Article deletion Categories Citations/references Referencing for beginners Citation Style 1 Cite errors References and page numbers Convert Diff Editing Minor edit toolbar edit conflict Find sources Files Footnotes Image deletion Infoboxes Linking (link color) Logging in Merging Page name Renaming pages Redirect Passwords Email confirmation Reverting Simple vandalism cleanup Talk pages (archiving) User contributions Coding (?) Wiki markup Barcharts Calculations Characters Columns Hidden text HTML Lists Magic words Music symbols Sections Sounds Tables Templates Transclusion URL Visual files Directories (?) Abbreviations Contents (Encyclopedia proper) Departments Editor's index Essays FAQs Glossary Guidelines Manual of Style Policies Tasks Tips Tools Missing Manual Ask for help on your talk page (?) v t e Wikipedia technical help Get personal technical help at the Teahouse, Help desk, Village pump (technical), talk pages or IRC. General technical help Browser notes Bypass cache Keyboard shortcuts Troubleshooting Editing CharInsert Edit conflict Edit toolbar Reverting How to create a page IRC Tutorial Mobile access Multilingual support Page history Page information Page name Help Printing Software notices Editnotice Special Characters Entering User access levels VisualEditor User guide Special page-related Special page help Edit filter Emailing users Logging in Reset passwords Logs Moving a page Fixing cut-and-paste moves Notifications/Echo FAQ Page Curation Page import Pending changes Random pages Recent changes Related changes Searching Linksearch Tags User contributions Watchlist What links here Wikitext Wikitext Cheatsheet Columns Line-break handling Lists Magic words For beginners Conditional expressions Switch parser function Time function Redirects Sections and TOCs Tables Introduction Basics Advanced table formatting Collapsing Conditional tables Sorting Using colours Links and diffs Links Interlanguage Interwiki Permanent Diffs Simplest diff guide Simple diff and link guide Complete diff and link guide Colon trick Link color Magic links Pipe trick URLs Media files: images, videos and sounds Media help Files Creation and usage Moving files to Commons Images Introduction to images Picture tutorial Preparing images for upload Uploading images Options to hide an image Extended image syntax SVG help Gallery tag Graphics tutorials Basic bitmap image editing How to improve image quality Graphics Lab resources Sound file markup Visual file markup Other graphics Family trees Graphs and charts How to create Barcharts To scale charts Math formulas Math symbols LaTeX symbols Rendering math Musical scores Musical symbols Timeline EasyTimeline syntax WikiHiero syntax Templates and Lua modules Templates Advanced template coding Template documentation Template index Template limits Template sandbox and test cases Citation templates Lua help Lua project Resources To do Substitution Purge Job queue Transclusion Labeled section Guide to Scribbling Data structure Namespaces Main/Article Category Draft File File description page Help Portal Project/Wikipedia Talk Archiving Template User User page design MediaWiki Bug reports and feature requests System message TimedMediaHandler extension Module Special HTML and CSS Cascading Style Sheets HTML in wikitext Catalogue of CSS classes Common.js and common.css User CSS for monospaced coding font Classes in Ambox Classes in microformats Markup validation Span tags Useful styles Customisation and tools Preferences Gadgets Skins Citation tools Cleaning up vandalism tools Customizing watchlists Hide pages IRC Scripts User scripts Guide Techniques User style Tools Alternative browsing Browser tools Editing tools Navigation shortcuts Optimum tool set Wikimedia Cloud Services Beta Features at MediaWiki Automated editing AfC helper script AutoWikiBrowser Bots Creating HotCat Huggle Navigation popups RedWarn Twinkle WPCleaner Inactive igloo STiki See also: Category:Wikipedia how-to Category:Wikipedia information pages Further navigation at: Help pages Administrators Accessibility Accounts Bots Referencing Citation metadata Templates User scripts v t e Wikipedia referencing Policies and guidelines Verifiability No original research Biographies of living persons Reliable sources Medicine Citing sources Scientific citations General advice Citation needed Find sources Combining sources Offline sources Referencing styles Citing sources Citation Style 1 Citation Style 2 Citation Style Vancouver LSA Comics Citation templates Reflist template Inline citations Footnotes Punctuation and footnotes Shortened footnotes Nesting footnotes Help for beginners Reference-tags Citations quick reference Introduction to referencing Referencing with citation templates Referencing without using templates Referencing dos and don'ts Citing Wikipedia Advanced help Cite link labels Citation tools Cite errors Cite messages Converting between references formats Reference display customization References and page numbers Guidance on source reviewing at FAC Template documentation {{Edit refs}} {{Refref}} {{Refref2}} {{Refstart}} Tools Wikipedia Library Deprecated Parenthetical referencing v t e Wikipedia templates Main namespace General Cleanup Verifiability and sources Disputes Hatnotes Infoboxes Links External link templates Linking country articles Lists Main page Section Sources of articles Quick reference Standard boxes Stub types Translation Other namespaces Compact TOC Category File Talk Template User Userboxes User talk Wikipedia WikiProject banners All namespaces Deletion (Speedy) Formatting Maintenance Merging Moving Requested Navigation Redirect pages Functional index Language codes Splitting Wikimedia sister projects Navboxes with templates Archive Articles for deletion Birth, death and age Button Category header Citation and verifiability Citation Style 1 Deletion review Editnotice Hatnotes Help desk Inline cleanup Introduction cleanup IPA Math Notice and warnings Organization infoboxes Proposed article mergers Protection Quotation Redirects Search Semantics Speedy deletion Notices String-handling Sup and sub-related Top icon Transwiki maintenance Unicode User talk pages User noticeboard notices Userboxes User rights Userspace linking Userspace Disclaimers Wikibreak WikiLove Inline images Wikipedia icons Discussion icons Comment icons Emoji Related topics Template documentation Examples of templates Maintenance template removal Requested templates WikiProject Templates Template help Template namespace Search Category v t e Useful links Daily pages CAT:HELP WP:ANI WP:BLPN WP:BOTN WP:COIN WP:DASH WP:EAR WP:FTN WP:HD WP:MCQ WP:NORN WP:NPOVN WP:PUMP (/A /M /P /R /T) WP:RD (/C /E /H /L /M /MA /S) WP:RFC (/MEDIA /BIO /ECON /HIST /LANG /NAME /PAG /PHIL /POLY /SCI /SOC /STYLE) WP:RFF WP:RSN WP:SPI WP:THIRD WP:DRV) Things to do CAT:BACKLOG CAT:M CAT:WRI WP:ABUSE WP:AFC WP:ASOF WP:DPWL WP:FAC WP:FAR WP:FPC WP:GAN WP:GAR WP:KIND WP:MISSING WP:PR WP:RD WP:RP WP:SPOKEN WP:UW WP:THQ WP:VITAL WP:WANTED WP:WC BrokenRedirects Disambigs LongPages NewPages OrphanPages TagsPages UncatImages UncatPages Resources CAT:HOWTO WP:AWARD WP:CATEGORY WP:CAT-R WP:CITE WP:CITET WP:COPYEDIT WP:CR WP:CUTPASTE WP:CUV WP:DEPT WP:DISAMBIG WP:EDIT WP:FOOT WP:FORMULA WP:HAT WP:ICT WP:LAYOUT WP:LIBRARY WP:MAGIC WP:MERGE WP:PIFU WP:PRECEDENT WP:REDIRECT WP:STYLE WP:SUMMARY WP:TEMPLATE CatTree PrefixIndex Policies / Guidelines WP:3RR WP:ADMIN WP:AP WP:APPEAL WP:ATTACK WP:AUTOBIO WP:BAN WP:BLANK WP:BLOCK WP:BOLD WP:BOTPOL WP:BUILD WP:CANVASS WP:CFORK WP:CIVIL WP:CONFLICT WP:CONSENSUS WP:COPYRIGHT WP:DELETE WP:DISCLAIM WP:DISPUTE WP:DISRUPTIVE WP:DONTBITE WP:DPR WP:EP WP:ETIQ WP:EDITWAR WP:FRINGE WP:GAME WP:GOOGLE WP:HARASS WP:HOAX WP:IGNORE WP:IUP WP:LEAD WP:LEGAL WP:LIBEL WP:LINKS WP:LIST WP:LIVING WP:LOGOS WP:M WP:NAME WP:NONFREE WP:NONSENSE WP:NOT WP:NOTE WP:NPOV WP:NPS WP:OFFICE WP:ORIGINAL WP:OVERSIGHT WP:OWN WP:PACL WP:PD WP:PEACOCK WP:PERFORM WP:POINT WP:POLLING WP:PROD WP:PROTECT WP:RELIABLE WP:SELF WP:SOCK WP:SPAM WP:SPEEDY WP:STUB WP:TALK WP:TP WP:TRIVIA WP:USERBOX WP:USERNAME WP:USERPAGE WP:VANDAL WP:VANISH WP:VERIFY WP:WEASEL WP:WHEEL Administrators CAT:AB CAT:CSD CAT:PER CAT:RFU WP:AE WP:AIV WP:AN WP:ANEW WP:ARL WP:CP WP:DGFA WP:NAS WP:OP WP:RFA WP:RFARB WP:RFM WP:RFPP WP:RM WP:RSPAM WP:UAA BlockLog DelLog ProtectLog External links Article statistics Edit Counter FIST ISBNdb Link checker Make Reference MissingTopics Is Admin? Wikichecker WikiEN-l archives Wiki ToDo v t e Wikipedia contents Types Overviews Outlines Lists Portals Glossaries Categories Indices Featured, good Featured articles Today's featured article Featured lists Featured pictures Featured topics Good articles Good topics Topics Current events Reference Culture Geography Health History Math Nature People Philosophy Religion Society Technology Places, people, and times Academic disciplines Anniversaries today Countries and territories deaths this year Timelines decades, centuries, and millennia Indexes A–Z index Categories Dewey Decimal classes Library of Congress Classification Roget's Thesaurus Spoken articles Related Top pages Vital articles New pages Requested content Most-wanted Article cleanup backlog Directories v t e Orders, decorations, and medals of Wikipedia Sorted by bestower By co-founder Jimmy Wales Order of the Day Wikimedian of the Year also by country By the Wikimedia Foundation Merchandise giveaways By the Wikipedia community WikiCup Editor of the Week W Award Four Award Triple Crown Million Award Barnstars on Wikipedia Ribbons Userboxes Awards by WikiProject    Awards by country    Barnstars 2.0 by country Other related awards  Personal user awards  Precious Autonomously Fifteen Year Society Ten Year Society Service awards Incremental service awards Administrative service awards See also Reward board Contests WikiLove Compliment before criticism Kindness Campaign Thanks! WikiProject Wikipedia Awards Wikipedia community portal Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Community_portal&oldid=987271613" Categories: Wikipedia basic information Wikipedia discussion Wikipedia directories Wikipedia news Wikipedia noticeboards Hidden categories: Project pages with short description Wikipedia semi-protected project pages Wikipedia move-protected project pages Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Project page Talk Variants Views Read View source View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons MediaWiki Wikispecies Wikibooks Wikidata Wikinews Wikiquote Wikisource Wikiversity Wikivoyage Wiktionary Languages Адыгабзэ Afrikaans Alemannisch Ænglisc العربية Aragonés Armãneashti অসমীয়া Asturianu Atikamekw Avañe'ẽ Azərbaycanca Basa Bali বাংলা Bân-lâm-gú Basa Banyumasan Башҡортса Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ भोजपुरी Български Boarisch Bosanski Brezhoneg Català Чӑвашла Čeština Chamoru Chavacano de Zamboanga Choctaw Cymraeg Dansk Davvisámegiella Deitsch Deutsch ދިވެހިބަސް ཇོང་ཁ Ebon Eesti Ελληνικά Эрзянь Español Esperanto Estremeñu Euskara فارسی Føroyskt Français Frysk Gaeilge Gaelg Gàidhlig Galego ГӀалгӀай 贛語 ગુજરાતી 客家語/Hak-kâ-ngî Хальмг 한국어 Hausa हिन्दी Hiri Motu Ido Igbo Ilokano Bahasa Indonesia Interlingua Interlingue Iñupiak IsiXhosa Íslenska Italiano עברית Jawa Kalaallisut ಕನ್ನಡ ქართული Kaszëbsczi Қазақша Kernowek Kinyarwanda Коми Kongo Kurdî Ladino Лакку Latina Lëtzebuergesch Лезги Lietuvių Ligure Lingua Franca Nova Livvinkarjala Magyar Македонски Malagasy മലയാളം Māori मराठी ဘာသာ မန် Bahasa Melayu Minangkabau Mirandés Мокшень မြန်မာဘာသာ Dorerin Naoero Na Vosa Vakaviti Nederlands Nedersaksies नेपाल भाषा 日本語 Napulitano Нохчийн Nordfriisk Norsk bokmål Norsk nynorsk ꆇꉙ Occitan Олык марий ଓଡ଼ିଆ Oshiwambo Otsiherero Pälzisch Pangasinan پښتو Patois Piemontèis Plattdüütsch Polski Português Qafár af Qaraqalpaqsha Ripoarisch Română Runa Simi Русиньскый Русский Саха тыла Sängö ᱥᱟᱱᱛᱟᱲᱤ Sardu Scots Seeltersk Setswana Sicilianu සිංහල Simple English سنڌي Slovenčina Slovenščina Soomaaliga کوردی Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Sunda Suomi Svenska Tagalog தமிழ் Tarandíne Татарча/tatarça ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး ไทย ትግርኛ Тоҷикӣ Tshivenda ತುಳು Türkçe Türkmençe Тыва дыл Удмурт ᨅᨔ ᨕᨘᨁᨗ Українська Vahcuengh Vèneto Vepsän kel’ Tiếng Việt Volapük 文言 West-Vlams Winaray 吴语 Xitsonga ייִדיש Yorùbá 粵語 Žemaitėška 中文 Madhurâ Edit links This page was last edited on 6 November 2020, at 00:02 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1632 ---- Mimnermus - Wikipedia Mimnermus From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Mimnermus was one of several ancient, Greek poets who composed verses about solar eclipses, and there was a total solar eclipse of his home town, Smyrna, on April 6, 648 BC[1] His poetry survives only as a few fragments yet they afford us a glimpse of his "brilliantly vivid" style.[2] Mimnermus (Greek: Μίμνερμος Mímnermos) was a Greek elegiac poet from either Colophon or Smyrna in Ionia, who flourished about 630–600 BC. He was strongly influenced by the example of Homer yet he wrote short poems suitable for performance at drinking parties and was remembered by ancient authorities chiefly as a love poet. Mimnermus in turn exerted a strong influence on Hellenistic poets such as Callimachus and thus also on Roman poets such as Propertius, who even preferred him to Homer for his eloquence on love themes (see Comments by other poets below). His work was collected by Alexandrian scholars in just two "books" (relatively few compared for example with the twenty-six books for Stesichorus) and today only small fragments survive. The fragments confirm the ancient estimate of him as a "consummate poet"[3] but also indicate that he was a "sturdier character" than the indulgent love poet he was assumed to be by various ancient commentators.[4] Almost no reliable, biographical details have been recorded. One ancient account linked him romantically with a flute girl who subsequently gave her name, Nanno, to one of his two books. Contents 1 Life and work 2 Nanno 3 Poetic style 3.1 Comments by other poets 3.1.1 Solon 3.1.2 Hermesianax 3.1.3 Callimachus 3.1.4 Propertius 3.1.5 Horace 4 Translations 5 References 6 External links Life and work[edit] The Byzantine encyclopaedia Suda provides a good example of the biographical uncertainties. Mimnermus, son of Ligyrtyades, from Colophon or Smyrna or Astypalaea, an elegiac poet. He flourished in the 37th Olympiad (632–29 BC) and so is earlier than the seven sages, although some say that he was their contemporary. He was also called Ligyaistades because of his harmonious clarity. He wrote ... books.[5] The gap indicates a corruption in the text and the original wording probably testified to two books, though the only source we have for this number was the grammarian Pomponius Porphyrion.[6] The Suda's mention of Astypalaea, an island in the southern Aegean, as a possible candidate for the poet's home town is mere fantasy.[7] Smyrna seems to be the most likely candidate.[8] The nickname Ligyaistades was probably taken by the Suda from an elegy addressed to Mimnermus by one of the seven sages—the Athenian lawgiver and elegiac poet, Solon (see Comments by other poets). Solon clearly admired the skills of the older poet, whom he addressed as Ligyaistades, yet he objected to his hedonism and singled out this couplet for criticism: The aulos was an instrument that might accompany the singing of elegies (Brygos Painter, Attic red-figured kylix, ca. 490 BC) αἲ γὰρ ἄτερ νούσων τε καὶ ἀργαλέων μελεδωνέων ἑξηκονταέτη μοῖρα κίχοι θανάτου. Would that my fated death might come at sixty, unattended by sickness and grievous cares.[9] Solon thought he should be willing to live to eighty. Plutarch was another ancient author critical of the poet's self-indulgence, dismissing one poem (see Fragment 1 in Poetic style below) as "the utterances of intemperate people."[10] Mimnermus however was not timid in his hedonism, as indicated by a couplet attributed to him in the Palatine Anthology, an exhortation to others to live intemperately: "Enjoy yourself. Some of the harsh citizens will speak ill of you, some better.". However, the same lines have also been attributed to Theognis.[11] A robust side to his personality is shown by his versatility as a poet. Archaic elegy was often used for patriotic purposes, to screw courage to the sticking place in times of war and to celebrate national achievements, and there is ample evidence that Mimnermus assumed this role as a poet. A quote recorded by the geographer Strabo represents the earliest surviving account of the Ionian migration, celebrating the settlement of Colophon and Smyrna from Pylos,[12] [13] while another quotation, recorded by Stobaeus, describes the heroic exploits of a Greek warrior against the cavalry of the Lydian king, Gyges, early in the 7th century—Mimnermus evidently hoped thereby to strengthen his countrymen's resolve against further Lydian encroachments.[14] The name "Mimnermus" might have been chosen by his parents to commemorate a famous Smyrnean victory against Gyges near the Hermus river (and yet names ending in -ermus were quite common in Ionia).[15] He was alive when Smyrna was besieged for the final time by the Lydians under Alyattes of Lydia and possibly he died with the town.[16] The disappearance of Smyrna for the next three hundred years might be the reason why Colophon was able to claim the poet as one of its own, yet Smyrna's own claim persisted and this suggests that its claim had the advantage of being true.[17] Smyrna lay near Mount Sipylos, one of whose rocky outcrops was traditionally imagined to be the tragic figure Niobe. Like other archaic poets, Mimnermus adapted myths to his own artistic needs and Aelian recorded that he attributed twenty children to Niobe, unlike Homer, for example, who attributed twelve to her.[18] According to Sallustius, Mimnermus was just as creative in his poetical account of Ismene, representing her as being killed by Tydeus at the command of the goddess, Athena, in the very act of making love to Theoclymenus[19]—an original account that was soon accepted by an international audience, being represented on an early Corinthian amphora[20] (pictured below). Imaginative accounts of the sun, voyaging at night from west to east in a golden bed, and of Jason the Argonaut voyaging to "Aeetes' city, where the rays of the swift Sun lie in a golden storeroom at the edge of Oceanus", survive in brief quotes by ancient authors.[21] According to Strabo, Smyrna was named after an Amazon and, according to a manuscript on proverbs, Mimnermus once composed on the theme of the proverb "A lame man makes the best lover", illustrating the Amazonian practice of maiming their men.[22] Nanno[edit] Unlike epic and lyric verse, which were accompanied by stringed instruments (the cithara and barbiton respectively), elegy was accompanied by a wind instrument (the aulos) and its performance therefore required at least two people—one to sing and one to play.[23] Ancient accounts associate Mimnermus with a female aulos player, Nanno, and one makes him her lover (see quote from Hermesianax in Comments by other poets below). Another ancient source indicates that Mimnermus was a pederast,[24] which is consistent with conventional sexual themes in Greek elegy. However, as noted by Martin Litchfield West, Mimnermus could have been a pederast and yet still have composed elegies about his love for Nanno: "Greek pederasty ... was for the most part a substitute for heterosexual love, free contacts between the sexes being restricted by society."[25] Mimnermus apparently was also capable of playing all by himself—Strabo described him as "both a pipe-player and an elegiac poet".[26] According to the poet Hipponax, Mimnermus when piping used the melancholy "fig-branch strain," apparently a traditional melody played while scapegoats were ritually driven from town, whipped with fig branches.[27] Weeping Stone, Mount Sipylos—associated with the tragic figure of Niobe. Ancient commentators sometimes refer to a work called Nanno and there is one clear reference to a work called Smyrneis. Modern scholars have concluded that these could be the two books mentioned by Porphyrion. The Nanno appears to have been a collection of short poems on a variety of themes (not just love), whereas the Smyrneis appears to have been a quasi-epic about Smyrna's confrontation with the Lydians. A cryptic comment by the Hellenistic poet Callimachus (see Comments by other poets below) also seems to refer to those two books, commending one for "sweetness" and distinguishing it from "the great lady". The latter seems to be a reference to Smyrneis, whereas the sweet verses—apparently the slender, economical kind of verses on which Callimachus modelled his own poetry—appear to refer to Nanno. However, the comment is preserved as an incomplete fragment and modern scholars are not unanimous in their interpretation of it.[28] Another Callimachus fragment has been interpreted as proof that Mimnermus composed some iambic verse but this conjecture has also been disputed.[29] Poetic style[edit] Corinthian vase depicting Mimnermus's original account of Ismene's death. Tydeus is depicted in black (usual for a male), Ismene and her fleeing lover Theoclymenus are white (usual for females and appropriate for an adulterous male on the run).[30] Elegy has been described as "a variation upon the heroic hexameter, in the direction of lyric poetry,"[31] and, in Mimnermus, this takes the form of a variation on Homer, as appears for example in Fragment 1, quoted below, about which one modern scholar had this to say" Mimnermus' dependence on Homer is striking: it is amusing to see him express such un-Homeric thoughts as those of fr.1 in language which is almost entirely Homer's. Homer's vocabulary, line-endings, formulas, similes, all reappear, but from this material Mimnermus creates quite a distinctive poetry of easy grace and pleasing rhythm. — David A. Campbell[32] Fragment 1 τίς δὲ βίος, τί δὲ τερπνὸν ἄτερ χρυσῆς Ἀφροδίτης; τεθναίην, ὅτε μοι μηκέτι ταῦτα μέλοι, κρυπταδίη φιλότης καὶ μείλιχα δῶρα καὶ εὐνή· οἷ’ ἥβης ἄνθεα γίγνεται ἁρπαλέα ἀνδράσιν ἠδὲ γυναιξίν· ἐπεὶ δ’ ὀδυνηρὸν ἐπέλθῃ γῆρας, ὅ τ’ αἰσχρὸν ὁμῶς καὶ καλὸν ἄνδρα τιθεῖ, αἰεί μιν φρένας ἀμφὶ κακαὶ τείρουσι μέριμναι, οὐδ’ αὐγὰς προσορῶν τέρπεται ἠελίου, ἀλλ’ ἐχθρὸς μὲν παισίν, ἀτίμαστος δὲ γυναιξίν· οὕτως ἀργαλέον γῆρας ἔθηκε θεός. Typically, the elegiac couplet enabled a poet to develop his ideas in brief, striking phrases, often made more memorable by internal rhyme in the shorter, pentameter line.[33] Mimnermus employs the internal rhyme in the pentameter lines 2 (μοι... μέλοι) and 4 (ἄνθεα...ἁρπαλέα). Here is the same poem paraphrased in English to imitate the rhythms of an elegy, with half-rhymes employed in the same lines 2 (far...for) and 4 (youth...bloom): What is life, what is sweet, if it is missing golden Aphrodite? Death would be better by far than to live with no time for Amorous assignations and the gift of tenderness and bedrooms, All of those things that give youth all of its covetted bloom, Both for men and for women. But when there arrives the vexatiousness Of old age, even good looks alter to unsightliness And the heart wears away under the endlessness of its anxieties: There is no joy anymore then in the light of the sun; In children there is found hate and in women there is found no respect. So difficult has old age been made for us all by God! Commenting on the poem, Maurice Bowra observed that "...after the challenging, flaunting opening we are led through a swift account of youth, and then as we approach the horrors of old age, the verse becomes slower, the sentences shorter, the stops more emphatic, until the poet closes with a short, damning line of summary."[34] Of all the other early elegists, only Archilochus might be compared with Mimnermus for effective use of language,[35] both being lifelong poets of outstanding skill.[36] Comments by other poets[edit] Solon[edit] Addressing Mimnermus and criticizing him for his stated wish to die at sixty years of age, as quoted above in Life and work, the Athenian sage said: ἀλλ᾽ εἴ μοι κἂν νῦν ἔτι πείσεαι, ἔξελε τοῦτον:— μηδὲ μέγαιρ᾽ ὅτι σεῦ λῷον ἐπεφρασάμην:— καὶ μεταποίησον, Λιγυαιστάδη, ὧδε δ᾽ ἄειδε: ὀγδωκονταέτη μοῖρα κίχοι θανάτου.[37] But if even now you will listen to me, remove this (i.e. Mimnermus's objectionable verse)— and do not be offended because my thoughts are better than yours— and changing it, Ligyaistades, sing as follows: May my fated death come at eighty.[38] Hermesianax[edit] "And Mimnermus who, after much suffering, discovered the sweet sound and breath given off by the soft pentameter, was on fire for Nanno..."[39] Callimachus[edit] Defining the kind of poetry he liked and believed best suited to his own, much later times, the Alexandrian scholar-poet commended Mimnermus thus [brackets indicate gaps in the text]: "Of the two [types of poetry] it was his slender [verses?], not the big lady, that revealed Mimnermus' sweetness. Propertius[edit] plus in amore valet Mimnermi versus Homero: :carmina mansuetus lenia quaerit Amor. [40] In love the verses of Mimnermus prevail over those of Homer. Gentle love calls for soft songs.[41] Horace[edit] si, Mimnermus uti censet, sine amore iocisque nil est iucundum, vivas in amore iocisque.[42] If, as Mimnermus believes, without love and jests There is no joy, may you live amid love and jests.[43] Translations[edit] Greek lyric: an anthology in translation By Andrew M. Miller Loeb vol. 1 lyric poetry Several fragments translated by Steve Hays Translation of Fragment 2 into Elegiac couplets References[edit] ^ Plutarch de.facie.lun., cited and annotated by Douglas E. Gerber, Greek Elegiac Poetry, Loeb (1999), pages 99–101 ^ J.P.Barron and P.E.Easterling, "Early Greek Elegy", P.Easterling and B.Knox (ed.s), The Cambridge History of Classical Literature:Greek Literature, Cambridge University Press (1985), page 136 ^ Douglas E. Gerber, Greek Elegiac Poetry, Loeb/Harvard University Press (1999), page 6 ISBN 9780674995826 ^ David A. Campbell, Greek Lyric Poetry, Bristol Classical Press (1982), page 222 ^ Suda, cited and translated by Douglas E. Gerber, Greek Elegiac Poetry, Loeb (1999), page 73 note 3 ^ Porph. on Hor. Epist. 2.2.101, cited, translated and annotated by Douglas E. Gerber, Greek Elegiac Poetry, Loeb (1999), page 77 note 1 ^ Douglas E. Gerber, Greek Elegiac Poetry, Loeb (1999), page 73 note 1 ^ A. Allen, The Fragments of Mimnermus: Text and Commentary, (Stuttgart 1993) page 13 note 17 ^ Douglas E. Gerber, Greek Elegiac Poetry, Loeb (1999), page 85 ^ Plutarch de virt.mor. 6.445f, cited and translated by Douglas E. Gerber, Greek Elegiac Poetry, Loeb (1999), page 81 ^ Anth.Pal. 9.50 = Theognis 795–96, cited, translated and annotated by Douglas E. Gerber, Greek Elegiac Poetry, Loeb (1999), pages 86 and 289 ^ J.P. Barron and P.E. Easterling, "Early Greek Elegy", P. Easterling and B. Knox (ed.s), The Cambridge History of Classical Literature:Greek Literature, Cambridge University Press (1985), page 134 ^ Strabo 14.1.4 and 14.1.3, cited by Douglas E. Gerber, Greek Elegiac Poetry, Loeb (1999), pages 87–9 ^ Stobaeus 3.7.11, cited and annotated by Douglas E. Gerber, Greek Elegiac Poetry, Loeb (1999), pages 95–7 ^ Martin Litchfield West, Studies in Greek Elegy and Iambus, Walter de Gruyter and Co. (1974), page 73 ^ Stobaeus 3.7.11, cited by David A. Campbell, Greek Lyric Poetry, Bristol Classical Press (1982), pages 222–23 ^ David A. Campbell, Greek Lyric Poetry, Bristol Classical Press (1982), pages 222 ^ Aelian V.H. 12.36, cited and annotated by Douglas E. Gerber, Greek Elegiac Poetry, Loeb (1999), page 99 ^ Sallustius' preface to Sophocles, Antigone, cited by Douglas E. Gerber, Greek Elegiac Poetry, Loeb (1999), page 99 ^ J.P.Barron and P.E.Easterling, "Early Greek Elegy", P.Easterling and B.Knox (ed.s), The Cambridge History of Classical Literature:Greek Literature, Cambridge University Press (1985), page 136 ^ Athenaeus 11.470a, and Strabo 1.2.40, cited by Douglas E. Gerber, Greek Elegiac Poetry, Loeb (1999), page 91–3 ^ Manuscript on proverbs, cited and annotated by Douglas E. Gerber, Greek Elegiac Poetry, Loeb (1999), page 101–3 ^ J.P. Barron and P.E. Easterling, "Early Greek Elegy", P. Easterling and B. Knox (ed.s), The Cambridge History of Classical Literature:Greek Literature, Cambridge University Press (1985), page 128 ^ Alexander Aetolus fr. 5.4–5 Powell ap. Ath. 15.699b, cited by Douglas E. Gerber, Greek Elegiac Poetry, Loeb (1999), page 77 ^ Martin Litchfield West, Studies in Greek Elegy and Iambus, Walter de Gruyter and Co. (1974), page 75 ^ Strabo 14.1.28, cited by Douglas E. Gerber, Greek Elegiac Poetry, Loeb (1999), page 72 ^ Pseudo-Plutarch de musica 8.1133f = Hipponax fr. 153 W., cited and annotated by Douglas E. Gerber, Greek Elegiac Poetry, Loeb (1999), page 77 ^ A. Allen, The Fragments of Mimnermus: Text and Commentary, (Stuttgart 1993) pages 146–56 ^ Douglas E. Gerber, A Companion to Greek Lyric Poets, Brill (1997) page 111 ^ James I Porter (ed), Construction of the Classical Body, University of Michigan Press (1999), pages 13, 38 Google preview ^ W.R.Hardie, Res Metrica 49, cited by David A. Campbell, Greek Lyric Poetry, Bristol Classical Press (1982), page xxiv-v ^ David A. Campbell, Greek Lyric Poetry, Bristol Classical Press (1982), pages 223-4 ^ David A. Campbell, Greek Lyric Poetry, Bristol Press (1982), page xxv ^ Maurice Bowra, E.G.E.19, quoted by David A. Campbell, Greek Lyric Poetry, Bristol Press (1982), page 224 ^ Douglas E. Gerber, A Companion to Greek Lyric Poets, Brill (1997) page 112 ^ J.P. Barron and P.E. Easterling, 'Early Greek Elegy', P. Easterling and B. Knox (ed.s), The Cambridge History of Classical Literature:Greek Literature, Cambridge University Press (1985), page 133-34 ^ Solon quoted by Diogenes Laertius 1.60 ^ Douglas E. Gerber, Greek Elegiac Poetry, Loeb (1999), page 141 ^ Hermesianax fr.7.35-37 Powell ap. Ath. 13.597f, cited by Douglas E. Gerber, Greek Elegiac Poetry, Loeb (1999), page 75 ^ Propertius 1.9.11-12 ^ Douglas E. Gerber, Greek Elegiac Poetry, Loeb (1999), page 79 ^ Horace, epist. 1.6.65-66 ^ Douglas E. Gerber, Greek Elegiac Poetry, Loeb (1999), page 79 External links[edit] Quotations related to Mimnermus at Wikiquote  Greek Wikisource has original text related to this article: Μίμνερμος Mimnermus Poems at demonax.info Authority control BIBSYS: 90782444 BNE: XX1000355 BNF: cb12356269z (data) CANTIC: a10124299 GND: 118784080 ISNI: 0000 0004 0362 0432 LCCN: n83319399 NTA: 069833486 RERO: 02-A003596768 SELIBR: 287061 SUDOC: 088480763 VcBA: 495/173252 VIAF: 249318061 WorldCat Identities: viaf-249318061 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mimnermus&oldid=974268942" Categories: Ancient Greek elegiac poets 7th-century BC Greek people 7th-century BC poets Ancient Colophonians Epigrammatists of the Greek Anthology Hidden categories: Articles containing Latin-language text Articles containing Ancient Greek (to 1453)-language text Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CANTIC identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with RERO identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikiquote Languages Български Català Čeština Deutsch Ελληνικά Español Estremeñu فارسی Français Galego Հայերեն Íslenska Italiano Latina Latviešu Magyar Mirandés Nederlands Polski Português Română Русский Sicilianu Suomi Svenska Türkçe Українська 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 22 August 2020, at 02:02 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1649 ---- Friedrich von Hagedorn - Wikipedia Friedrich von Hagedorn From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Friedrich von Hagedorn Friedrich von Hagedorn (23 April 1708 – 28 October 1754), German poet, was born at Hamburg, where his father, a man of scientific and literary taste, was Danish ambassador.[1] Contents 1 Biography 1.1 Life 1.2 Career 2 References 3 External links Biography[edit] Life[edit] He was educated at the gymnasium of Hamburg, and later (1726) became a student of law at Jena. Returning to Hamburg in 1729, he obtained the appointment of unpaid private secretary to the Danish ambassador in London, where he lived till 1731.[2] Hagedorn's return to Hamburg was followed by a period of great poverty and hardship, but in 1733 he was appointed secretary to the so-called "English Court" (Englischer Hof) in Hamburg, a trading company founded in the 13th century.[2] He shortly afterwards married, and from this time had sufficient leisure to pursue his literary occupations till his death. Career[edit] The first collection of Hagedorn's poems was published at Hamburg shortly after his return from Jena in 1729, under the title Versuch einiger Gedichte (reprinted by A. Sauer, Heilbronn, 1883). In 1738 appeared Versuch in poetischen Fabeln und Erzählungen;[3] in 1742 a collection of his lyric poems, under the title Sammlung neuer Oden und Lieder;[3] and his Moralische Gedichte in 1750.[3] A collection of his entire works was published at Hamburg in 1757 after his death. The best is J.J. Eschenburg's edition (5 vols., Hamburg, 1800). Selections of his poetry with an excellent introduction in F. Muncker's Anakreontiker und preussisch-patriotische Lyriker (Stuttgart, 1894). See also H. Schuster, F. von Hagedorn und seine Bedeutung für die deutsche Literatur (Leipzig, 1882); W. Eigenbrodt, Hagedorn und die Erzählung in Reimversen (Berlin, 1884). The Austrian composer Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart set his poem Die Alte (The Old Woman) in his song of the same name (K. 517) in 1787. Joseph Haydn set two of his poems in his canons (a capella songs) (Hob. XXVIIb). References[edit] ^ Britannica Online. "Friedrich von Hagedorn". Britannica eb.com. Retrieved 19 February 2012. ^ a b Pohl, Wolfgang. "Friedrich von Hagedorn" (in German). Studio für alte Literatur. Retrieved 19 February 2012. ^ a b c Projekt Gutenberg-DE. "Friedrich von Hagedorn". Spiegel Online. Retrieved 19 February 2012.  This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Hagedorn, Friedrich von". Encyclopædia Britannica. 12 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 813. External links[edit] Poems of Friedrich von Hagedorn (Complete) (in German) Authority control BNF: cb13176487n (data) GND: 118700421 ISNI: 0000 0000 8086 0326 LCCN: n83800080 MBA: 9d9ccf8d-91cf-4b5b-8a1a-3bda1e5bf20b NKC: ola364066 NTA: 072286490 SELIBR: 274320 SNAC: w67h3jj3 SUDOC: 035245301 VcBA: 495/337868 VIAF: 7371751 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n83800080 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Friedrich_von_Hagedorn&oldid=990671659" Categories: 1708 births 1754 deaths 18th-century German poets Writers from Hamburg University of Jena alumni German male poets German-language poets 18th-century male writers Hidden categories: CS1 German-language sources (de) Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica with Wikisource reference Wikipedia articles incorporating text from the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica Articles with German-language sources (de) Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with MusicBrainz identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SNAC-ID identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Languages Dansk Deutsch Español Esperanto Français Italiano Norsk bokmål Polski Русский Suomi Svenska Українська Edit links This page was last edited on 25 November 2020, at 21:15 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1676 ---- Julian (emperor) - Wikipedia Julian (emperor) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Roman emperor from 361 to 363, philosopher Roman emperor Julian Portrait of Emperor Julian on a bronze coin from Antioch. Legend: d n Fl Cl Iulianus p f aug. Roman emperor Augustus 3 November 361 – 26 June 363 (proclaimed in early 360) Predecessor Constantius II Successor Jovian Caesar 6 November 355 – early 360 Born 331 Constantinople Died 26 June 363 (aged 31 or 32) Frygium, Mesopotamia Burial Tarsus, then Church of the Holy Apostles Spouse Helena Full name Flavius Claudius Julianus Regnal name Imperator Caesar dominus noster Flavius Claudius Iulianus pius felix Augustus[1] Dynasty Constantinian Father Julius Constantius Mother Basilina Religion Greco-Roman polytheism Previously Christianity Julian[i] (Latin: Flavius Claudius Julianus; Greek: Ἰουλιανὸς, Ioulianòs; 331 – 26 June 363) was Roman emperor from 361 to 363, as well as a notable philosopher and author in Greek.[3] His rejection of Christianity, and his promotion of Neoplatonic Hellenism in its place, caused him to be remembered as Julian the Apostate by the Christian Church.[4][5] A member of the Constantinian dynasty, Julian was orphaned as a child. He was raised by the Gothic slave Mardonius, who had a profound influence on him, providing Julian with an excellent education.[6] Julian became caesar over the western provinces by order of Constantius II in 355, and in this role he campaigned successfully against the Alamanni and Franks. Most notable was his crushing victory over the Alamanni at the Battle of Argentoratum (Strasbourg) in 357, leading his 13,000 men against a Germanic army three times larger. In 360, Julian was proclaimed Augustus by his soldiers at Lutetia (Paris), sparking a civil war with Constantius. However, Constantius died before the two could face each other in battle, and named Julian as his successor. In 363, Julian embarked on an ambitious campaign against the Sasanian Empire. The campaign was initially successful, securing a victory outside Ctesiphon in Mesopotamia.[7] However, he did not attempt to besiege the capital and moved into Persia's heartland, but soon faced supply problems and was forced to retreat northwards while ceaselessly being harassed by Persian skirmishes. During the Battle of Samarra, Julian was mortally wounded under mysterious circumstances.[8][6] He was succeeded by Jovian, a senior officer in the imperial guard, who was obliged to cede territory, including Nisibis, in order to save the trapped Roman forces.[9] Julian was a man of unusually complex character: he was "the military commander, the theosophist, the social reformer, and the man of letters".[10] He was the last non-Christian ruler of the Roman Empire, and he believed that it was necessary to restore the Empire's ancient Roman values and traditions in order to save it from dissolution.[11] He purged the top-heavy state bureaucracy, and attempted to revive traditional Roman religious practices at the expense of Christianity. His attempt to build a Third Temple in Jerusalem was probably intended to harm Christianity rather than please Jews.[6] Julian also forbade the Christians from teaching and learning classical texts.[12] Contents 1 Life 1.1 Early life 1.2 Caesar in Gaul 1.2.1 Campaigns against Germanic kingdoms 1.2.2 Taxation and administration 1.3 Rebellion in Paris 1.4 Empire and administration 1.5 Clash with the Antiochenes 1.6 Persian campaign 1.6.1 Into enemy territory 1.6.2 Ctesiphon 1.6.3 Death 1.7 Tomb 2 Religious issues 2.1 Beliefs 2.2 Restoration of state Paganism 2.2.1 Paganism's shift under Julian 2.2.2 Juventinus and Maximus 2.2.3 Charity 2.3 Attempt to rebuild the Jewish Temple 3 Ancestry 4 Works 4.1 Problems regarding authenticity 5 In popular culture 5.1 Literature 5.2 Film 6 See also 7 Notes 8 References 8.1 Citations 8.2 Ancient sources 8.3 Modern sources 9 Further reading 10 External links Life[edit] Early life[edit] Flavius Claudius Julianus was born at Constantinople in 331,[13] the son of Julius Constantius,[14] consul in 335 and half-brother of the emperor Constantine, by his second wife, Basilina, a woman of Greek origin.[15][16] Both of his parents were Christians. Julian's paternal grandparents were the emperor Constantius Chlorus and his second wife, Flavia Maximiana Theodora. His maternal grandfather was Julius Julianus, Praetorian Prefect of the East under the emperor Licinius from 315 to 324, and consul suffectus in 325.[17] The name of Julian's maternal grandmother is unknown. Julian solidus, c. 361. The obverse shows a bearded Julian inscribed fl·cl·iulianus p·p· aug·, calling Julian "father of the nation" (Latin: Pater Patriae). The reverse depicts an armed Roman soldier bearing a military standard in one hand and subduing a captive with the other, a reference to the military strength of the Roman Empire, inscribed: virtus exercitus romanorum, lit. 'the virtue of the Roman Army' The mint mark sirm. indicates the coin was minted in Sirmium, the home of Constantine's family. In the turmoil after the death of Constantine in 337, in order to establish himself and his brothers, Julian's zealous Arian cousin Constantius II appears to have led a massacre of most of Julian's close relatives. Constantius II allegedly ordered the murders of many descendants from the second marriage of Constantius Chlorus and Theodora, leaving only Constantius and his brothers Constantine II and Constans I, and their cousins, Julian and Constantius Gallus (Julian's half-brother), as the surviving males related to Emperor Constantine. Constantius II, Constans I, and Constantine II were proclaimed joint emperors, each ruling a portion of Roman territory. Julian and Gallus were excluded from public life, were strictly guarded in their youth, and given a Christian education. They were likely saved by their youth and at the urging of the Empress Eusebia. If Julian's later writings are to be believed, Constantius would later be tormented with guilt at the massacre of 337. Initially growing up in Bithynia, raised by his maternal grandmother, at the age of seven Julian was under the guardianship of Eusebius, the semi-Arian Christian Bishop of Nicomedia, and taught by Mardonius, a Gothic eunuch, about whom he later wrote warmly. After Eusebius died in 342, both Julian and Gallus were exiled to the imperial estate of Macellum in Cappadocia. Here Julian met the Christian bishop George of Cappadocia, who lent him books from the classical tradition. At the age of 18, the exile was lifted and he dwelt briefly in Constantinople and Nicomedia.[18] He became a lector, a minor office in the Christian church, and his later writings show a detailed knowledge of the Bible, likely acquired in his early life.[19] Julian's conversion from Christianity to paganism happened at around the age of 20. Looking back on his life in 362, Julian wrote that he had spent twenty years in the way of Christianity and twelve in the true way, i.e., the way of Helios.[20] Julian began his study of Neoplatonism in Asia Minor in 351, at first under Aedesius, the philosopher, and then Aedesius' student Eusebius of Myndus. It was from Eusebius that Julian learned of the teachings of Maximus of Ephesus, whom Eusebius criticized for his more mystical form of Neoplatonic theurgy. Eusebius related his meeting with Maximus, in which the theurgist invited him into the temple of Hecate and, chanting a hymn, caused a statue of the goddess to smile and laugh, and her torches to ignite. Eusebius reportedly told Julian that he "must not marvel at any of these things, even as I marvel not, but rather believe that the thing of the highest importance is that purification of the soul which is attained by reason." In spite of Eusebius' warnings regarding the "impostures of witchcraft and magic that cheat the senses" and "the works of conjurers who are insane men led astray into the exercise of earthly and material powers", Julian was intrigued, and sought out Maximus as his new mentor. According to the historian Eunapius, when Julian left Eusebius, he told his former teacher "farewell, and devote yourself to your books. You have shown me the man I was in search of."[21] Constantine II died in 340 when he attacked his brother Constans. Constans in turn fell in 350 in the war against the usurper Magnentius. This left Constantius II as the sole remaining emperor. In need of support, in 351 he made Julian's half-brother, Gallus, caesar of the East, while Constantius II himself turned his attention westward to Magnentius, whom he defeated decisively that year. In 354 Gallus, who had imposed a rule of terror over the territories under his command, was executed. Julian was summoned to Constantius' court in Mediolanum (Milan) in 354, and held for a year, under suspicion of treasonable intrigue, first with his brother and then with Claudius Silvanus; he was cleared, in part because Empress Eusebia intervened on his behalf, and he was permitted to study in Athens (Julian expresses his gratitude to the empress in his third oration).[22] While there, Julian became acquainted with two men who later became both bishops and saints: Gregory of Nazianzus and Basil the Great. In the same period, Julian was also initiated into the Eleusinian Mysteries, which he would later try to restore. Caesar in Gaul[edit] After dealing with the rebellions of Magnentius and Silvanus, Constantius felt he needed a permanent representative in Gaul. In 355, Julian was summoned to appear before the emperor in Mediolanum and on 6 November was made caesar of the West, marrying Constantius' sister, Helena. Constantius, after his experience with Gallus, intended his representative to be more a figurehead than an active participant in events, so he packed Julian off to Gaul with a small retinue, assuming his prefects in Gaul would keep Julian in check. At first reluctant to trade his scholarly life for war and politics, Julian eventually took every opportunity to involve himself in the affairs of Gaul.[23] In the following years he learned how to lead and then run an army, through a series of campaigns against the Germanic tribes that had settled on both sides of the Rhine. Campaigns against Germanic kingdoms[edit] During his first campaign in 356, Julian led an army to the Rhine, where he engaged the inhabitants and recovered several towns that had fallen into Frankish hands, including Colonia Agrippina (Cologne). With success under his belt he withdrew for the winter to Gaul, distributing his forces to protect various towns, and choosing the small town of Senon near Verdun to await the spring.[24] This turned out to be a tactical error, for he was left with insufficient forces to defend himself when a large contingent of Franks besieged the town and Julian was virtually held captive there for several months, until his general Marcellus deigned to lift the siege. Relations between Julian and Marcellus seem to have been poor. Constantius accepted Julian's report of events and Marcellus was replaced as magister equitum by Severus.[25][26] The following year saw a combined operation planned by Constantius to regain control of the Rhine from the Germanic peoples who had spilt across the river onto the west bank. From the south his magister peditum Barbatio was to come from Milan and amass forces at Augst (near the Rhine bend), then set off north with 25,000 soldiers; Julian with 13,000 troops would move east from Durocortorum (Rheims). However, while Julian was in transit, a group of Laeti attacked Lugdunum (Lyon) and Julian was delayed in order to deal with them. This left Barbatio unsupported and deep in Alamanni territory, so he felt obliged to withdraw, retracing his steps. Thus ended the coördinated operation against the Germanic peoples.[27][28] With Barbatio safely out of the picture, King Chnodomarius led a confederation of Alamanni forces against Julian and Severus at the Battle of Argentoratum. The Romans were heavily outnumbered[ii] and during the heat of battle a group of 600 horsemen on the right wing deserted,[29] yet, taking full advantage of the limitations of the terrain, the Romans were overwhelmingly victorious. The enemy was routed and driven into the river. King Chnodomarius was captured and later sent to Constantius in Milan.[30][31] Ammianus, who was a participant in the battle, portrays Julian in charge of events on the battlefield[32] and describes how the soldiers, because of this success, acclaimed Julian attempting to make him Augustus, an acclamation he rejected, rebuking them. He later rewarded them for their valor.[33] Rather than chase the routed enemy across the Rhine, Julian now proceeded to follow the Rhine north, the route he followed the previous year on his way back to Gaul. At Moguntiacum (Mainz), however, he crossed the Rhine in an expedition that penetrated deep into what is today Germany, and forced three local kingdoms to submit. This action showed the Alamanni that Rome was once again present and active in the area. On his way back to winter quarters in Paris he dealt with a band of Franks who had taken control of some abandoned forts along the Meuse River.[31][34] In 358, Julian gained victories over the Salian Franks on the Lower Rhine, settling them in Toxandria in the Roman Empire, north of today's city of Tongeren, and over the Chamavi, who were expelled back to Hamaland. Taxation and administration[edit] At the end of 357 Julian, with the prestige of his victory over the Alamanni to give him confidence, prevented a tax increase by the Gallic praetorian prefect Florentius and personally took charge of the province of Belgica Secunda. This was Julian's first experience with civil administration, where his views were influenced by his liberal education in Greece. Properly it was a role that belonged to the praetorian prefect. However, Florentius and Julian often clashed over the administration of Gaul. Julian's first priority, as caesar and nominal ranking commander in Gaul, was to drive out the barbarians who had breached the Rhine frontier. However, he sought to win over the support of the civil population, which was necessary for his operations in Gaul and also to show his largely Germanic army the benefits of Imperial rule. He therefore felt it was necessary to rebuild stable and peaceful conditions in the devastated cities and countryside. For this reason, Julian clashed with Florentius over the latter's support of tax increases, as mentioned above, and Florentius's own corruption in the bureaucracy. Constantius attempted to maintain some modicum of control over his caesar, which explains his removal of Julian's close adviser Saturninius Secundus Salutius from Gaul. His departure stimulated the writing of Julian's oration, "Consolation Upon the Departure of Salutius".[35] Rebellion in Paris[edit] 19th century depiction of Julian being proclaimed Emperor in Paris (fancifully located in the Thermes de Cluny, then thought to have been the Imperial Palace), standing on a shield in the Frankish manner, in February 360. In the fourth year of Julian's stay in Gaul, the Sassanid Emperor, Shapur II, invaded Mesopotamia and took the city of Amida after a 73-day siege. In February 360, Constantius II ordered more than half of Julian's Gallic troops to join his eastern army, the order by-passing Julian and going directly to the military commanders. Although Julian at first attempted to expedite the order, it provoked an insurrection by troops of the Petulantes, who had no desire to leave Gaul. According to the historian Zosimus, the army officers were those responsible for distributing an anonymous tract[36] expressing complaints against Constantius as well as fearing for Julian's ultimate fate. Notably absent at the time was the prefect Florentius, who was seldom far from Julian's side, though now he was kept busy organizing supplies in Vienne and away from any strife that the order could cause. Julian would later blame him for the arrival of the order from Constantius.[37] Ammianus Marcellinus even suggested that the fear of Julian gaining more popularity than himself caused Constantius to send the order on the urging of Florentius.[38] The troops proclaimed Julian Augustus in Paris, and this in turn led to a very swift military effort to secure or win the allegiance of others. Although the full details are unclear, there is evidence to suggest that Julian may have at least partially stimulated the insurrection. If so, he went back to business as usual in Gaul, for, from June to August of that year, Julian led a successful campaign against the Attuarian Franks.[39][40] In November, Julian began openly using the title Augustus, even issuing coins with the title, sometimes with Constantius, sometimes without. He celebrated his fifth year in Gaul with a big show of games.[41] Solidus of Julian issued at Ravenna in 361, during his war with Constantius. The reverse reads VIRTUS EXERC(ITUS) GALL(ICARUM), 'virtue of the Gallic army', celebrating Julian's legions from Gaul which acclaimed him as emperor. In the spring of 361, Julian led his army into the territory of the Alamanni, where he captured their king, Vadomarius. Julian claimed that Vadomarius had been in league with Constantius, encouraging him to raid the borders of Raetia.[42] Julian then divided his forces, sending one column to Raetia, one to northern Italy and the third he led down the Danube on boats. His forces claimed control of Illyricum and his general, Nevitta, secured the pass of Succi into Thrace. He was now well out of his comfort zone and on the road to civil war.[43] (Julian would state in late November that he set off down this road "because, having been declared a public enemy, I meant to frighten him [Constantius] merely, and that our quarrel should result in intercourse on more friendly terms..."[44]) However, in June, forces loyal to Constantius captured the city of Aquileia on the north Adriatic coast, an event that threatened to cut Julian off from the rest of his forces, while Constantius's troops marched towards him from the east. Aquileia was subsequently besieged by 23,000 men loyal to Julian.[45] All Julian could do was sit it out in Naissus, the city of Constantine's birth, waiting for news and writing letters to various cities in Greece justifying his actions (of which only the letter to the Athenians has survived in its entirety).[46] Civil war was avoided only by the death on November 3 of Constantius, who, in his last will, is alleged by some sources to have recognized Julian as his rightful successor. Empire and administration[edit] The Church of the Holy Apostles, where Julian brought Constantius II to be buried. On December 11, 361, Julian entered Constantinople as sole emperor and, despite his rejection of Christianity, his first political act was to preside over Constantius' Christian burial, escorting the body to the Church of the Apostles, where it was placed alongside that of Constantine.[46] This act was a demonstration of his lawful right to the throne.[47] He is also now thought to have been responsible for the building of Santa Costanza on a Christian site just outside Rome as a mausoleum for his wife Helena and sister-in-law Constantina.[48] The new Emperor rejected the style of administration of his immediate predecessors. He blamed Constantine for the state of the administration and for having abandoned the traditions of the past. He made no attempt to restore the tetrarchal system begun under Diocletian. Nor did he seek to rule as an absolute autocrat. His own philosophic notions led him to idealize the reigns of Hadrian and Marcus Aurelius. In his first panegyric to Constantius, Julian described the ideal ruler as being essentially primus inter pares ("first among equals"), operating under the same laws as his subjects. While in Constantinople, therefore, it was not strange to see Julian frequently active in the Senate, participating in debates and making speeches, placing himself at the level of the other members of the Senate.[49] He viewed the royal court of his predecessors as inefficient, corrupt and expensive. Thousands of servants, eunuchs and superfluous officials were therefore summarily dismissed. He set up the Chalcedon tribunal to deal with the corruption of the previous administration under the supervision of Magister Militum Arbitio. Several high-ranking officials under Constantius, including the chamberlain Eusebius, were found guilty and executed. (Julian was conspicuously absent from the proceedings, perhaps signaling his displeasure at their necessity.)[50] He continually sought to reduce what he saw as a burdensome and corrupt bureaucracy within the Imperial administration whether it involved civic officials, secret agents or the imperial postal service. Another effect of Julian's political philosophy was that the authority of the cities was expanded at the expense of the imperial bureaucracy as Julian sought to reduce direct imperial involvement in urban affairs. For example, city land owned by the imperial government was returned to the cities, city council members were compelled to resume civic authority, often against their will, and the tribute in gold by the cities called the aurum coronarium was made voluntary rather than a compulsory tax. Additionally, arrears of land taxes were cancelled.[51] This was a key reform reducing the power of corrupt imperial officials, as the unpaid taxes on land were often hard to calculate or higher than the value of the land itself. Forgiving back taxes both made Julian more popular and allowed him to increase collections of current taxes. While he ceded much of the authority of the imperial government to the cities, Julian also took more direct control himself. For example, new taxes and corvées had to be approved by him directly rather than left to the judgment of the bureaucratic apparatus. Julian certainly had a clear idea of what he wanted Roman society to be, both in political as well as religious terms. The terrible and violent dislocation of the 3rd century meant that the Eastern Mediterranean had become the economic locus of the Empire. If the cities were treated as relatively autonomous local administrative areas, it would simplify the problems of imperial administration, which as far as Julian was concerned, should be focused on the administration of the law and defense of the empire's vast frontiers. In replacing Constantius's political and civil appointees, Julian drew heavily from the intellectual and professional classes, or kept reliable holdovers, such as the rhetorician Themistius. His choice of consuls for the year 362 was more controversial. One was the very acceptable Claudius Mamertinus, previously the Praetorian prefect of Illyricum. The other, more surprising choice was Nevitta, Julian's trusted Frankish general. This latter appointment made overt the fact that an emperor's authority depended on the power of the army. Julian's choice of Nevitta appears to have been aimed at maintaining the support of the Western army which had acclaimed him. Clash with the Antiochenes[edit] Julian as portrayed by Giovanni Battista Cavalieri (1583). From Romanorum Imperatorum effigies, preserved in the Municipal Library of Trento (Italy) After five months of dealings at the capital, Julian left Constantinople in May and moved to Antioch, arriving in mid-July and staying there for nine months before launching his fateful campaign against Persia in March 363. Antioch was a city favored by splendid temples along with a famous oracle of Apollo in nearby Daphne, which may have been one reason for his choosing to reside there. It had also been used in the past as a staging place for amassing troops, a purpose which Julian intended to follow.[52] His arrival on 18 July was well received by the Antiochenes, though it coincided with the celebration of the Adonia, a festival which marked the death of Adonis, so there was wailing and moaning in the streets—not a good omen for an arrival.[53][54] Julian soon discovered that wealthy merchants were causing food problems, apparently by hoarding food and selling it at high prices. He hoped that the curia would deal with the issue for the situation was headed for a famine. When the curia did nothing, he spoke to the city's leading citizens, trying to persuade them to take action. Thinking that they would do the job, he turned his attention to religious matters.[54] He tried to resurrect the ancient oracular spring of Castalia at the temple of Apollo at Daphne. After being advised that the bones of 3rd-century bishop Babylas were suppressing the god, he made a public-relations mistake in ordering the removal of the bones from the vicinity of the temple. The result was a massive Christian procession. Shortly after that, when the temple was destroyed by fire, Julian suspected the Christians and ordered stricter investigations than usual. He also shut up the chief Christian church of the city, before the investigations proved that the fire was the result of an accident.[55][56] When the curia still took no substantial action in regards to the food shortage, Julian intervened, fixing the prices for grain and importing more from Egypt. Then landholders refused to sell theirs, claiming that the harvest was so bad that they had to be compensated with fair prices. Julian accused them of price gouging and forced them to sell. Various parts of Libanius' orations may suggest that both sides were justified to some extent[57][58] while Ammianus blames Julian for "a mere thirst for popularity".[59] Julian's ascetic lifestyle was not popular either, since his subjects were accustomed to the idea of an all-powerful Emperor who placed himself well above them. Nor did he improve his dignity with his own participation in the ceremonial of bloody sacrifices.[60] David S. Potter, an assistant secretary of the US Navy, said after nearly two millennia: They expected a man who was both removed from them by the awesome spectacle of imperial power, and would validate their interests and desires by sharing them from his Olympian height (...) He was supposed to be interested in what interested his people, and he was supposed to be dignified. He was not supposed to leap up and show his appreciation for a panegyric that it was delivered, as Julian had done on January 3, when Libanius was speaking, and ignore the chariot races.[61] He then tried to address public criticism and mocking of him by issuing a satire ostensibly on himself, called Misopogon or "Beard Hater". There he blames the people of Antioch for preferring that their ruler have his virtues in the face rather than in the soul. Even Julian's intellectual friends and fellow pagans were of a divided mind about this habit of talking to his subjects on an equal footing: Ammianus Marcellinus saw in that only the foolish vanity of someone "excessively anxious for empty distinction", whose "desire for popularity often led him to converse with unworthy persons".[62] On leaving Antioch he appointed Alexander of Heliopolis as governor, a violent and cruel man whom the Antiochene Libanius, a friend of the emperor, admits on first thought was a "dishonourable" appointment. Julian himself described the man as "undeserving" of the position, but appropriate "for the avaricious and rebellious people of Antioch".[63] Persian campaign[edit] v t e Julian's Persian War Pirisabora Maiozamalcha Ctesiphon Maranga Samarra Julian's rise to Augustus was the result of military insurrection eased by Constantius's sudden death. This meant that, while he could count on the wholehearted support of the Western army which had aided his rise, the Eastern army was an unknown quantity originally loyal to the Emperor he had risen against, and he had tried to woo it through the Chalcedon tribunal. However, to solidify his position in the eyes of the eastern army, he needed to lead its soldiers to victory and a campaign against the Sassanid Persians offered such an opportunity. An audacious plan was formulated whose goal was to lay siege on the Sassanid capital city of Ctesiphon and definitively secure the eastern border. Yet the full motivation for this ambitious operation is, at best, unclear. There was no direct necessity for an invasion, as the Sassanids sent envoys in the hope of settling matters peacefully. Julian rejected this offer.[64] Ammianus states that Julian longed for revenge on the Persians and that a certain desire for combat and glory also played a role in his decision to go to war.[65] Illustration from The Fall of Princes by John Lydgate (which is a translation of De Casibus Virorum Illustribus by Giovanni Boccaccio) depicting "the skyn of Julyan". There is no evidence that Julian's corpse was skinned and displayed, and it is likely that the illustrator simply confused the fate of Julian's body with that of Emperor Valerian. Into enemy territory[edit] On 5 March 363, despite a series of omens against the campaign, Julian departed from Antioch with about 65,000–83,000,[66][67] or 80,000–90,000 men[68] (the traditional number accepted by Gibbon[69] is 95,000 effectives total), and headed north toward the Euphrates. En route he was met by embassies from various small powers offering assistance, none of which he accepted. He did order the Armenian King Arsaces to muster an army and await instructions.[70] He crossed the Euphrates near Hierapolis and moved eastward to Carrhae, giving the impression that his chosen route into Persian territory was down the Tigris.[71] For this reason it seems he sent a force of 30,000 soldiers under Procopius and Sebastianus further eastward to devastate Media in conjunction with Armenian forces.[72] This was where two earlier Roman campaigns had concentrated and where the main Persian forces were soon directed.[73] Julian's strategy lay elsewhere, however. He had had a fleet built of over 1,000 ships at Samosata in order to supply his army for a march down the Euphrates and of 50 pontoon ships to facilitate river crossings. Procopius and the Armenians would march down the Tigris to meet Julian near Ctesiphon.[72] Julian's ultimate aim seems to have been "regime change" by replacing king Shapur II with his brother Hormisdas.[73][74] After feigning a march further eastward, Julian's army turned south to Circesium at the confluence of the Abora (Khabur) and the Euphrates arriving at the beginning of April.[72] Passing Dura on April 6, the army made good progress, bypassing towns after negotiations or besieging those which chose to oppose him. At the end of April the Romans captured the fortress of Pirisabora, which guarded the canal approach from the Euphrates to Ctesiphon on the Tigris.[75] As the army marched toward the Persian capital, the Sassanids broke the dikes which crossed the land, turning it into marshland, slowing the progress of the Roman army.[76] Ctesiphon[edit] Julian near Ctesiphon; medieval miniature By mid-May, the army had reached the vicinity of the heavily fortified Persian capital, Ctesiphon, where Julian partially unloaded some of the fleet and had his troops ferried across the Tigris by night.[77] The Romans gained a tactical victory over the Persians before the gates of the city, driving them back into the city.[78] However, the Persian capital was not taken, the main Persian army was still at large and approaching, while the Romans lacked a clear strategic objective.[79] In the council of war which followed, Julian's generals persuaded him not to mount a siege against the city, given the impregnability of its defenses and the fact that Shapur would soon arrive with a large force.[80] Julian, not wanting to give up what he had gained and probably still hoping for the arrival of the column under Procopius and Sebastianus, set off east into the Persian interior, ordering the destruction of the fleet.[78] This proved to be a hasty decision, for they were on the wrong side of the Tigris with no clear means of retreat and the Persians had begun to harass them from a distance, burning any food in the Romans' path. Julian had not brought adequate siege equipment, so there was nothing he could do when he found that the Persians had flooded the area behind him, forcing him to withdraw.[81] A second council of war on 16 June 363 decided that the best course of action was to lead the army back to the safety of Roman borders, not through Mesopotamia, but northward to Corduene.[82][83] Death[edit] Sassanian relief of the investiture of Ardashir II showing Mithra, Shapur II and Ahura Mazda above a defeated Julian, lying prostrate Detail of the fallen Julian During the withdrawal, Julian's forces suffered several attacks from Sassanid forces.[83] In one such engagement on 26 June 363, the indecisive Battle of Samarra near Maranga, Julian was wounded when the Sassanid army raided his column. In the haste of pursuing the retreating enemy, Julian chose speed rather than caution, taking only his sword and leaving his coat of mail.[84] He received a wound from a spear that reportedly pierced the lower lobe of his liver, the peritoneum and intestines. The wound was not immediately deadly. Julian was treated by his personal physician, Oribasius of Pergamum, who seems to have made every attempt to treat the wound. This probably included the irrigation of the wound with a dark wine, and a procedure known as gastrorrhaphy, the suturing of the damaged intestine. On the third day a major hemorrhage occurred and the emperor died during the night.[85][iii] As Julian wished, his body was buried outside Tarsus, though it was later removed to Constantinople.[86] In 364, Libanius stated that Julian was assassinated by a Christian who was one of his own soldiers;[87] this charge is not corroborated by Ammianus Marcellinus or other contemporary historians. John Malalas reports that the supposed assassination was commanded by Basil of Caesarea.[88] Fourteen years later, Libanius said that Julian was killed by a Saracen (Lakhmid) and this may have been confirmed by Julian's doctor Oribasius who, having examined the wound, said that it was from a spear used by a group of Lakhmid auxiliaries in Persian service.[89] Later Christian historians propagated the tradition that Julian was killed by Saint Mercurius.[90] Julian was succeeded by the short-lived Emperor Jovian who reestablished Christianity's privileged position throughout the Empire. Libanius says in his epitaph of the deceased emperor (18.304) that "I have mentioned representations (of Julian); many cities have set him beside the images of the gods and honour him as they do the gods. Already a blessing has been besought of him in prayer, and it was not in vain. To such an extent has he literally ascended to the gods and received a share of their power from him themselves." However, no similar action was taken by the Roman central government, which would be more and more dominated by Christians in the ensuing decades. Considered apocryphal is the report that his dying words were νενίκηκάς με, Γαλιλαῖε, or Vicisti, Galilaee ("You have won, Galilean"),[iv] supposedly expressing his recognition that, with his death, Christianity would become the Empire's state religion. The phrase introduces the 1866 poem Hymn to Proserpine, which was Algernon Charles Swinburne's elaboration of what a philosophic pagan might have felt at the triumph of Christianity. It also ends the Polish Romantic play The Undivine comedy written in 1833 by Zygmunt Krasiński. Tomb[edit] Porphyry sarcophagi outside the Istanbul Archaeological Museum. As he had requested,[92] Julian's body was buried in Tarsus. It lay in a tomb outside the city, across a road from that of Maximinus Daia.[93] However, chronicler Zonaras says that at some "later" date his body was exhumed and reburied in or near the Church of the Holy Apostles in Constantinople, where Constantine and the rest of his family lay.[94] His sarcophagus is listed as standing in a "stoa" there by Constantine Porphyrogenitus.[95] The church was demolished by the Ottoman Turks after the fall of Constantinople in 1453. Today a sarcophagus of porphyry, identified as Julian's by Jean Ebersolt, stands in the grounds of the Archaeological Museum in Istanbul.[96] 4th-century cameo of an emperor, probably Julian, performing sacrifice (National Archaeological Museum, Florence) Religious issues[edit] Beliefs[edit] Julian's personal religion was both pagan and philosophical; he viewed the traditional myths as allegories, in which the ancient gods were aspects of a philosophical divinity. The chief surviving sources are his works To King Helios and To the Mother of the Gods, which were written as panegyrics, not theological treatises.[14] As the last pagan ruler of the Roman Empire, Julian's beliefs are of great interest for historians, but they are not in complete agreement. He learned theurgy from Maximus of Ephesus, a student of Iamblichus;[97] his system bears some resemblance to the Neoplatonism of Plotinus; Polymnia Athanassiadi has brought new attention to his relations with Mithraism, although whether he was initiated into it remains debatable; and certain aspects of his thought (such as his reorganization of paganism under High Priests, and his fundamental monotheism) may show Christian influence. Some of these potential sources have not come down to us, and all of them influenced each other, which adds to the difficulties.[98] According to one theory (that of Glen Bowersock in particular), Julian's paganism was highly eccentric and atypical because it was heavily influenced by an esoteric approach to Platonic philosophy sometimes identified as theurgy and also Neoplatonism. Others (Rowland Smith, in particular) have argued that Julian's philosophical perspective was nothing unusual for a "cultured" pagan of his time, and, at any rate, that Julian's paganism was not limited to philosophy alone, and that he was deeply devoted to the same gods and goddesses as other pagans of his day. Because of his Neoplatonist background Julian accepted the creation of humanity as described in Plato's Timaeus. Julian writes, "when Zeus was setting all things in order there fell from him drops of sacred blood, and from them, as they say, arose the race of men."[99] Further he writes, "they who had the power to create one man and one woman only, were able to create many men and women at once..."[100] His view contrasts with the Christian belief that humanity is derived from the one pair, Adam and Eve. Elsewhere he argues against the single pair origin, indicating his disbelief, noting for example, "how very different in their bodies are the Germans and Scythians from the Libyans and Ethiopians."[101][102] The Christian historian Socrates Scholasticus was of the opinion that Julian believed himself to be Alexander the Great "in another body" via transmigration of souls, "in accordance with the teachings of Pythagoras and Plato".[103] The diet of Julian is said to have been predominantly vegetable-based.[104] Restoration of state Paganism[edit] See also: Henosis and Henotheism Julian the Apostate presiding at a conference of sectarians, by Edward Armitage, 1875 After gaining the purple, Julian started a religious reformation of the empire, which was intended to restore the lost strength of the Roman state. He supported the restoration of Hellenistic polytheism as the state religion. His laws tended to target wealthy and educated Christians, and his aim was not to destroy Christianity but to drive the religion out of "the governing classes of the empire — much as Chinese Buddhism was driven back into the lower classes by a revived Confucian mandarinate in 13th century China."[105] He restored pagan temples which had been confiscated since Constantine's time, or simply appropriated by wealthy citizens; he repealed the stipends that Constantine had awarded to Christian bishops, and removed their other privileges, including a right to be consulted on appointments and to act as private courts. He also reversed some favors that had previously been given to Christians. For example, he reversed Constantine's declaration that Majuma, the port of Gaza, was a separate city. Majuma had a large Christian congregation while Gaza was still predominantly pagan. On 4 February 362, Julian promulgated an edict to guarantee freedom of religion. This edict proclaimed that all the religions were equal before the law, and that the Roman Empire had to return to its original religious eclecticism, according to which the Roman state did not impose any religion on its provinces. The edict was seen as an act of favor toward the Jews, in order to upset the Christians. Coptic icon showing Saint Mercurius killing Julian. According to a tradition, Saint Basil (an old school-mate of Julian) had been imprisoned at the start of Julian's Sassanid campaign. Basil prayed to Mercurius to help him, and the saint appeared in a vision to Basil, claiming to have speared Julian to death. Since the persecution of Christians by past Roman Emperors had seemingly only strengthened Christianity, many of Julian's actions were designed to harass Christians and undermine their ability to organize resistance to the re-establishment of paganism in the empire.[106] Julian's preference for a non-Christian and non-philosophical view of Iamblichus' theurgy seems to have convinced him that it was right to outlaw the practice of the Christian view of theurgy and demand the suppression of the Christian set of Mysteries.[107] In his School Edict Julian required that all public teachers be approved by the Emperor; the state paid or supplemented much of their salaries. Ammianus Marcellinus explains this as intending to prevent Christian teachers from using pagan texts (such as the Iliad, which was widely regarded as divinely inspired)[citation needed] that formed the core of classical education: "If they want to learn literature, they have Luke and Mark: Let them go back to their churches and expound on them", the edict says.[105] This was an attempt to remove some of the influence of the Christian schools which at that time and later used ancient Greek literature in their teachings in their effort to present the Christian religion as being superior to paganism.[citation needed] The edict also dealt a severe financial blow to many Christian scholars, tutors and teachers, as it deprived them of students. In his Tolerance Edict of 362, Julian decreed the reopening of pagan temples, the restitution of confiscated temple properties, and the return from exile of dissident Christian bishops. The latter was an instance of tolerance of different religious views, but it may also have been an attempt by Julian to foster schisms and divisions between different Christian sects, since conflict between rival Christian sects was quite fierce.[108] His care in the institution of a pagan hierarchy in opposition to that of the Christians was due to his wish to create a society in which every aspect of the life of the citizens was to be connected, through layers of intermediate levels, to the consolidated figure of the Emperor — the final provider for all the needs of his people. Within this project, there was no place for a parallel institution, such as the Christian hierarchy or Christian charity.[109] Paganism's shift under Julian[edit] Julian's popularity among the people and the army during his brief reign suggest that he might have brought paganism back to the fore of Roman public and private life.[110] In fact, during his lifetime, neither pagan nor Christian ideology reigned supreme, and the greatest thinkers of the day argued about the merits and rationality of each religion.[111] Most importantly for the pagan cause, though, Rome was still a predominantly pagan empire that had not wholly accepted Christianity.[112] Even so, Julian's short reign did not stem the tide of Christianity. The emperor's ultimate failure can arguably be attributed to the manifold religious traditions and deities that paganism promulgated. Most pagans sought religious affiliations that were unique to their culture and people, and they had internal divisions that prevented them from creating any one ‘pagan religion.’ Indeed, the term pagan was simply a convenient appellation for Christians to lump together the believers of a system they opposed.[113] In truth, there was no Roman religion, as modern observers would recognize it.[114] Instead, paganism came from a system of observances that one historian has characterized as “no more than a spongy mass of tolerance and tradition.”[114] This system of tradition had already shifted dramatically by the time Julian came to power; gone were the days of massive sacrifices honoring the gods. The communal festivals that involved sacrifice and feasting, which once united communities, now tore them apart—Christian against pagan.[115] Civic leaders did not even have the funds, much less the support, to hold religious festivals. Julian found the financial base that had supported these ventures (sacred temple funds) had been seized by his uncle Constantine to support the Christian Church.[116] In all, Julian's short reign simply could not shift the feeling of inertia that had swept across the Empire. Christians had denounced sacrifice, stripped temples of their funds, and cut priests and magistrates off from the social prestige and financial benefits accompanying leading pagan positions in the past. Leading politicians and civic leaders had little motivation to rock the boat by reviving pagan festivals. Instead, they chose to adopt the middle ground by having ceremonies and mass entertainment that were religiously neutral.[117] After witnessing the reign of two emperors bent on supporting the Church and stamping out paganism, it is understandable that pagans simply did not embrace Julian's idea of proclaiming their devotion to polytheism and their rejection of Christianity. Many chose to adopt a practical approach and not support Julian's public reforms actively for fear of a Christian revival. However, this apathetic attitude forced the emperor to shift central aspects of pagan worship. Julian's attempts to reinvigorate the people shifted the focus of paganism from a system of tradition to a religion with some of the same characteristics that he opposed in Christianity.[118] For example, Julian attempted to introduce a tighter organization for the priesthood, with greater qualifications of character and service. Classical paganism simply did not accept this idea of priests as model citizens. Priests were elites with social prestige and financial power who organized festivals and helped pay for them.[116] Yet Julian's attempt to impose moral strictness on the civic position of priesthood only made paganism more in tune with Christian morality, drawing it further from paganism's system of tradition. Indeed, this development of a pagan order created the foundations of a bridge of reconciliation over which paganism and Christianity could meet.[119] Likewise, Julian's persecution of Christians, who by pagan standards were simply part of a different cult, was quite an un-pagan attitude that transformed paganism into a religion that accepted only one form of religious experience while excluding all others—such as Christianity.[120] In trying to compete with Christianity in this manner, Julian fundamentally changed the nature of pagan worship. That is, he made paganism a religion, whereas it once had been only a system of tradition. Juventinus and Maximus[edit] Despite this inadvertent reconciliation of paganism to Christianity, however, many of the Church fathers viewed the emperor with hostility, and told stories of his supposed wickedness after his death. A sermon by Saint John Chrysostom, entitled On Saints Juventinus and Maximinus, tells the story of two of Julian's soldiers at Antioch, who were overheard at a drinking party, criticizing the emperor's religious policies, and taken into custody. According to John, the emperor had made a deliberate effort to avoid creating martyrs of those who disagreed with his reforms; but Juventinus and Maximinus admitted to being Christians, and refused to moderate their stance. John asserts that the emperor forbade anyone from having contact with the men, but that nobody obeyed his orders; so he had the two men executed in the middle of the night. John urges his audience to visit the tomb of these martyrs.[121] Charity[edit] The fact that Christian charities were open to all, including pagans, put this aspect of Roman citizens' lives out of the control of Imperial authority and under that of the Church. Thus Julian envisioned the institution of a Roman philanthropic system, and cared for the behaviour and the morality of the pagan priests, in the hope that it would mitigate the reliance of pagans on Christian charity, saying: "These impious Galileans not only feed their own poor, but ours also; welcoming them into their agapae, they attract them, as children are attracted, with cakes."[122] Attempt to rebuild the Jewish Temple[edit] In 363, not long before Julian left Antioch to launch his campaign against Persia, in keeping with his effort to oppose Christianity, he allowed Jews to rebuild their Temple.[123][124][125] The point was that the rebuilding of the Temple would invalidate Jesus prophecy about its destruction in 70, which Christians had cited as proof of Jesus' truth.[123] But fires broke out and stopped the project.[126] A personal friend of his, Ammianus Marcellinus, wrote this about the effort: Julian thought to rebuild at an extravagant expense the proud Temple once at Jerusalem, and committed this task to Alypius of Antioch. Alypius set vigorously to work, and was seconded by the governor of the province; when fearful balls of fire, breaking out near the foundations, continued their attacks, till the workmen, after repeated scorchings, could approach no more: and he gave up the attempt. The failure to rebuild the Temple has been ascribed to the Galilee earthquake of 363. Although there is contemporary testimony for the miracle, in the Orations of St. Gregory Nazianzen, this may be taken to be unreliable.[127] Sabotage by Christians is a possibility, as is an accidental fire. Divine intervention was for centuries a common view among Christian historians,[128] and it was seen as proof of Jesus divinity.[123] Julian's support of Jews caused Jews to call him "Julian the Hellene".[129] Ancestry[edit] Ancestors of Julian 4. Constantius Chlorus 2. Julius Constantius 5. Flavia Maximiana Theodora 1.Julian 6. Julius Julianus 3. Basilina 7. (Unknown) Works[edit] Julian wrote several works in Greek, some of which have come down to us. Budé Date Work Comment Wright I 356/7[130] Panegyric In Honour Of Constantius Written to reassure Constantius that he was on his side. I II ~June 357[130] Panegyric In Honour Of Eusebia Expresses gratitude for Eusebia's support. III III 357/8[131] The Heroic Deeds Of Constantius Indicates his support of Constantius, while being critical. (Sometimes called "second panegyric to Constantius".) II IV 359[35] Consolation Upon the Departure of Salutius[132] Grapples with the removal of his close advisor in Gaul. VIII V 361[133] Letter To The Senate And People of Athens An attempt to explain the actions leading up to his rebellion. – VI early 362[134] Letter To Themistius The Philosopher Response to an ingratiating letter from Themistius, outlining J.'s political reading – VII March 362[135] To The Cynic Heracleios Attempt to set Cynics straight regarding their religious responsibilities. VII VIII ~March 362[136] Hymn To The Mother Of The Gods A defense of Hellenism and Roman tradition. V IX ~May 362[137] To the Uneducated Cynics Another attack on Cynics who he thought didn't follow the principles of Cynicism. VI X December 362[138] The Caesars[139] Satire describing a competition among Roman emperors as to who was the best. Strongly critical of Constantine. – XI December 362[140] Hymn To King Helios Attempt to describe the Roman religion as seen by Julian. IV XII early 363[141] Misopogon, Or, Beard-Hater Written as a satire on himself, while attacking the people of Antioch for their shortcomings. – – 362/3[142] Against the Galilaeans Polemic against Christians, which now only survives as fragments. – – 362[v] Fragment Of A Letter To A Priest Attempt to counteract the aspects that he thought were positive in Christianity. – – 359–363 Letters Both personal and public letters from much of his career. – – ? Epigrams Small number of short verse works. – Budé indicates the numbers used by Athanassiadi given in the Budé edition (1963 & 1964) of Julian's Opera.[vi] Wright indicates the oration numbers provided in W.C.Wright's edition of Julian's works. Ioulianou autokratoros ta sozomena (1696) The religious works contain involved philosophical speculations, and the panegyrics to Constantius are formulaic and elaborate in style. The Misopogon (or "Beard Hater") is a light-hearted account of his clash with the inhabitants of Antioch after he was mocked for his beard and generally scruffy appearance for an Emperor. The Caesars is a humorous tale of a contest among some of the most notable Roman Emperors: Julius Caesar, Augustus, Trajan, Marcus Aurelius, Constantine, and also Alexander the Great. This was a satiric attack upon the recent Constantine, whose worth, both as a Christian and as the leader of the Roman Empire, Julian severely questions. One of the most important of his lost works is his Against the Galileans, intended to refute the Christian religion. The only parts of this work which survive are those excerpted by Cyril of Alexandria, who gives extracts from the three first books in his refutation of Julian, Contra Julianum. These extracts do not give an adequate idea of the work: Cyril confesses that he had not ventured to copy several of the weightiest arguments. Problems regarding authenticity[edit] Julian's works have been edited and translated several times since the Renaissance, most often separately; but many are translated in the Loeb Classical Library edition of 1913, edited by Wilmer Cave Wright. Wright mentions, however, that there are many problems surrounding Julian's vast collection of works, mainly the letters ascribed to Julian.[143] The collections of letters we have today are the result of many smaller collections which contained varying numbers of Julian's works in various combinations. For example, in Laurentianus 58.16 the largest collection of letters ascribed to Julian was found, containing 43 manuscripts. it is unclear what the origins of many letters in these collections are. Joseph Bidez & François Cumont compiled all of these different collections together in 1922 and got a total of 284 items. 157 of these were considered genuine and 127 were regarded spurious. This contrasts starkly with Wright's earlier mentioned collection which contains only 73 items which are considered genuine and 10 apocryphal letter. Michael Trapp notes however that when comparing Bidez & Cumont's work with Wright, they regard as many as sixteen of Wright's genuine letters as spurious.[144] Which works can be ascribed to Julian is thus very much up to debate. The problems surrounding Julian's collection of works are exacerbated by the fact that Julian was a very motivated writer, which means it is possible that many more letters could have circulated, despite his short reign. Julian himself attests to the large amount of letters he had to write in one of the letters which is likely to be genuine.[145] Julian's religious agenda gave him even more work than the average emperor as he sought to instruct his newly-styled pagan priests and he had to deal with discontent Christian leaders and communities. An example of him instructing his pagan priests is visible in a fragment in the Vossianus MS., inserted in the Letter to Themistius.[146] Additionally, Julian's hostility towards the Christian faith inspired vicious counteractions by Christian authors as can be seen in Gregory of Nazianzus' invectives against Julian.[147][148] Christians no doubt suppressed some of Julian's works as well.[149] This Christian influence is still visible in Wright's much smaller collection of Julian's letters. She comments on how some letters are suddenly cut off when the contents become hostile towards Christians, believing them to be the result of Christian censoring. Notable examples of this are in the Fragment of a letter to a Priest and the letter to High-Priest Theodorus.[150][151] In popular culture[edit] This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Julian" emperor – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (June 2019) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) Literature[edit] In 1681 Lord Russell, an outspoken opponent of King Charles II of England and his brother The Duke of York, got his chaplain to write a Life of Julian the Apostate. This work made use of the Roman Emperor's life in order to address contemporary English political and theological debates – specifically, to reply to the conservative arguments of Dr Hickes's sermons, and defend the lawfulness of resistance in extreme cases. In 1847, the controversial German theologian David Friedrich Strauss published in Mannheim the pamphlet Der Romantiker auf dem Thron der Cäsaren ("A Romantic on the Throne of the Caesars"), in which Julian was satirised as "an unworldly dreamer, a man who turned nostalgia for the ancients into a way of life and whose eyes were closed to the pressing needs of the present". In fact, this was a veiled criticism of the contemporary King Frederick William IV of Prussia, known for his romantic dreams of restoring the supposed glories of feudal Medieval society.[152] Julian's life inspired the play Emperor and Galilean by Henrik Ibsen. The late nineteenth century English novelist George Gissing read an English translation of Julian's work in 1891[153] Julian's life and reign were the subject of the novel The Death of the Gods (Julian the Apostate) (1895) in the trilogy of historical novels entitled "Christ and Antichrist" (1895–1904) by the Russian Symbolist poet, novelist and literary theoretician Dmitrii S. Merezhkovskii. The opera Der Apostat (1924) by the composer and conductor Felix Weingartner is about Julian. In 1945 Nikos Kazantzakis authored the tragedy Julian the Apostate in which the emperor is depicted as an existentialist hero committed to a struggle which he knows will be in vain. It was first staged in Paris in 1948. Julian was the subject of a novel, Julian (1964), by Gore Vidal, describing his life and times. It is notable for, among other things, its scathing critique of Christianity. Julian appeared in Gods and Legions, by Michael Curtis Ford (2002). Julian's tale was told by his closest companion, the Christian saint Caesarius, and accounts for the transition from a Christian philosophy student in Athens to a pagan Roman Augustus of the old nature. Julian's letters are an important part of the symbolism of Michel Butor's novel La Modification. The fantasy alternate history The Dragon Waiting by John M. Ford, while set in the time of the Wars of the Roses, uses the reign of Julian as its point of divergence. His reign not being cut short, he was successful in disestablishing Christianity and restoring a religiously eclectic societal order which survived the fall of Rome and into the Renaissance. Characters in the novel refer to him as "Julian the Wise". The dystopian speculative fiction novel by Robert Charles Wilson, Julian Comstock: A Story of 22nd-Century America, parallels the life of Julian with the title character as the hereditary president of an oligarchic future United States of America who tries to restore science and combat the fundamentalist Christianity that has taken over the country. Film[edit] An Italian movie treatment of his life, Giuliano l'Apostata, appeared in 1919. See also[edit] Byzantine Empire portal Against the Galilaeans Peroz-Shapur, the ancient town of Perisabora destroyed by Julian in 363 Diodorus of Tarsus Itineraries of the Roman emperors, 337–361 List of Byzantine emperors Notes[edit] ^ Rarely Julian II. The iteration distinguishes him from Didius Julianus; it does not account for the usurper Sabinus Julianus.[2] ^ Ammianus says that there were 35,000 Alamanni, Res Gestae, 16.12.26, though this figure is now thought to be an overestimate – see David S. Potter, p. 501. ^ Note that Ammianus Marcellinus (Res Gestae, 25.3.6 & 23) is of the view that Julian died the night of the same day that he was wounded. ^ First recorded by Theodoret[91] in the 5th century. ^ Not dealt with in Athanassiadi, or dated by Bowersock, but reflects a time when Julian was emperor, and he had other issues to deal with later. ^ Julian's Opera, edited by J.Bidez, G.Rochefort, and C.Lacombrade, with French translations of all the principal works except Against the Galilaeans, which is only preserved in citations in a polemic work by Cyril. References[edit] Citations[edit] ^ Browning, p. 103. ^ David Sear, Roman Coins and Their Values, Volume 5 (London: Spink, 2014), p. 267. ^ Grant, Michael (1980). Greek and Latin authors, 800 B.C.–A.D. 1000, Part 1000. H. W. Wilson Co. p. 240. ISBN 978-0-8242-0640-6. JULIAN THE APOSTATE (Flavins Claudius Julianus), Roman emperor and Greek writer, was born at Constantinople in ad 332 and died in 363. ^ Gibbon, Edward. "Chapter 23". The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. ^ A Companion to Julian the Apostate. Brill. 2020-01-20. ISBN 978-90-04-41631-4. ^ a b c "Julian". Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Retrieved August 23, 2018. ^ Phang et al. 2016, p. 998. ^ "Ancient Rome: The reign of Julian". Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Retrieved August 23, 2018. ^ Potter, David (2009). Rome in the Ancient World - From Romulus to Justinian. Thames & Hudson. p. 289. ISBN 978-0500251522. ^ Glanville Downey, "Julian the Apostate at Antioch", Church History, Vol. 8, No. 4 (December, 1939), pp. 303–315. See p. 305. ^ Athanassiadi, p. 88. ^ Potter, David (2009). Rome in the Ancient World - From Romulus to Justinian. Thames & Hudson. p. 288. ISBN 978-0500251522. ^ Tougher, 12, citing Bouffartigue: L'Empereur Julien et la culture de son temps p. 30 for the argument for 331; A.H. Jones, J.R. Martindale, and J. Morris "Prosopography of the Later Roman Empire, Vol. I", p. 447 (Iulianus 29) argues for May or June 332. Bowersock, p. 22, wrote that the month attribution originated in an error and considers that the weight of evidence points to 331, against 332. ^ a b Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Julian" . Encyclopædia Britannica. 15 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 548. ^ Norwich, John Julius (1989). Byzantium: the early centuries. Knopf. p. 83. ISBN 978-0-394-53778-8. Julius Constantius...Constantine had invited him, with his second wife and his young family, to take up residence in his new capital; and it was in Constantinople that his third son Julian was born, in May or June of the year 332. The baby's mother, Basilina, a Greek from Asia Minor, died a few weeks later... ^ Bradbury, Jim (2004). The Routledge companion to medieval warfare. Routledge. p. 54. ISBN 978-0-415-22126-9. JULIAN THE APOSTATE, FLAVIUS CLAUDIUS JULIANUS, ROMAN EMPEROR (332–63) Emperor from 361, son of Julius Constantius and a Greek mother Basilina, grandson of Constantius Chlorus, the only pagan Byzantine Emperor. ^ Jones, Martindale, and Morris (1971) Prosopography of the Later Roman Empire volume 1, pp. 148, 478–479. Cambridge. ^ Cambridge Ancient History, v. 13, pp. 44–45. ^ Boardman, p. 44, citing Julian to the Alexandrians, Wright's letter 47, of November or December 362. Ezekiel Spanheim 434D. Twelve would be literal, but Julian is counting inclusively. ^ Julian. "Letter 47: To the Alexandrians", translated by Emily Wilmer Cave Wright, v. 3, p. 149. The full text of Letters of Julian/Letter 47 at Wikisource ^ "Maximus Lives of the Philosophers and Sophists (English translation)". www.tertullian.org. 1921. pp. 343–565. Retrieved March 19, 2019. ^ R. Browning, The Emperor Julian (London, 1975), pp. 74–75. However, Shaun Tougher, "The Advocacy of an Empress: Julian and Eusebia" (The Classical Quarterly, New Series, Vol. 48, No. 2 (1998), pp. 595–599), argues that the kind Eusebia of Julian's panegyric is a literary creation and that she was doing the bidding of her husband in bringing Julian around to doing what Constantius had asked of him. See especially p. 597. ^ David S. Potter, The Roman Empire at Bay AD 180–395, p. 499. ^ Most sources give the town as Sens, which is well into the interior of Gaul. See John F. Drinkwater, The Alamanni and Rome 213–496, OUP Oxford 2007, p. 220. ^ Cambridge Ancient History, v. 13, p. 49. ^ David S. Potter, The Roman Empire at Bay AD 180–395, p. 501. ^ David S. Potter, p. 501. ^ Cambridge Ancient History, v.13, pp. 50–51. ^ D. Woods, "On the 'Standard-Bearers' at Strasbourg: Libanius, or. 18.58–66", Mnemosyne, Fourth Series, Vol. 50, Fasc. 4 (August, 1997), p. 479. ^ David S. Potter, pp. 501–502. ^ a b Cambridge Ancient History, v.13, p. 51. ^ Ammianus Marcellinus Res Gestae, 16.12.27ff, 38ff, 55 ^ Ammianus Marcellinus Res Gestae, 16.12.64–65 ^ John F. Drinkwater, The Alamanni and Rome 213–496, pp. 240–241. ^ a b Athanassiadi, p. 69. ^ grammation: cf. Zosimus, Historia Nova, 3.9, commented by Veyne, L'Empire Gréco-Romain, p. 45 ^ Julian, Letter to the Athenians, 282C. ^ Ammianus Marcellinus Res Gestae, 20.4.1–2 ^ Ammianus Marcellinus. Res Gestae, 20.10.1–2 ^ Cambridge Ancient History, v. 13, pp. 56–57. ^ David S. Potter, p. 506. ^ Cambridge Ancient History v. 13, p. 58. ^ Cambridge Ancient History v. 13, p. 59. ^ In a private letter to his Uncle Julian, in W.C. Wright, v. 3, p. 27. ^ J. Norwich, Byzantium: The Early Centuries, 89 ^ a b Cambridge Ancient History v. 13, p. 60. ^ Athanassiadi, p. 89. ^ Webb, Matilda. The Churches and Catacombs of Early Christian Rome: A Comprehensive Guide, pp. 249–252, 2001, Sussex Academic Press, ISBN 1-902210-58-1, 978-1-902210-58-2, google books ^ Cambridge Ancient History v. 13, pp. 63–64. ^ Cambridge Ancient History v. 13, p. 61. ^ Cambridge Ancient History v. 13, p. 65. ^ Bowersock, p. 95. ^ Cambridge Ancient History v. 13, p. 69. ^ a b Bowersock, p. 96. ^ Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae, 22.12.8 – 22.13.3 ^ Socrates of Constantinople, Historia ecclesiastica, 3.18 ^ Libanius, Orations, 18.195 & 16.21 ^ Libanius, Orations, 1.126 & 15.20 ^ Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae, 22.14.1 ^ Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae, 22.14.3 ^ David S. Potter, The Roman Empire at Bay, pp. 515–516 ^ Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae, 22.7.1, 25.4.17 (Commented by Veyne, L"Empire Gréco-Romain, p. 77) ^ See Letter 622 by Libanius: "That Alexander was appointed to the government at first, I confess, gave me some concern, as the principal persons among us were dissatisfied. I thought it dishonourable, injurious, and unbecoming a prince; and that repeated fines would rather weaken than improve the city...." and the translator's note upon it: "This is the Alexander of whom Ammianus says (23.2), "When Julian was going to leave Antioch, he made one Alexander of Heliopolis, governor of Syria, a turbulent and severe man, saying that 'undeserving as he was, such a ruler suited the avaricious and contumellious Antiochians'." As the letter makes clear, Julian handed the city over to be looted by a man he himself regarded as unworthy, and the Christian inhabitants, who had dared to oppose his attempt to restore paganism, to be forced to attend and applaud pagan ceremonies at sword-point; and be 'urged' to cheer more loudly." ^ Libanius, Oration 12, 76–77 ^ Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae, 22.12.1–2 ^ Zosimus, Historia Nova, book 3, chapter 12. Zosimus' text is ambiguous and refers to a smaller force of 18,000 under Procopius and a larger force of 65,000 under Julian himself; it's unclear if the second figure includes the first. ^ Elton, Hugh, Warfare in Roman Europe AD 350–425, p. 210, using the higher estimate of 83,000. ^ Bowersock, Julian the Apostate, p. 108. ^ The Decline And Fall Of The Roman Empire, (The Modern Library, 1932), chapter XXIV., p. 807 ^ Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae, 23.2.1–2 ^ Ridley, Notes, p. 318. ^ a b c Bowersock, Julian the Apostate, p. 110. ^ a b David S, Potter, The Roman Empire at Bay, p. 517. ^ Libanius, Epistulae, 1402.2 ^ Dodgeon & Lieu, The Roman Eastern Frontier and the Persian Wars, p. 203. ^ Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae, 24.3.10–11. ^ Dodgeon & Lieu, The Roman Eastern Frontier and the Persian Wars, p. 204. ^ a b Cambridge Ancient History, p. 75. ^ Adrian Goldsworth, How Rome fell. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009, ISBN 978-0-300-13719-4 , p. 232 ^ Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae, 24.7.1. ^ David S. Potter, Rome in the ancient world, pp. 287–290. ^ Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae, 24.8.1–5. ^ a b Dodgeon & Lieu, The Roman Eastern Frontier and the Persian Wars, p. 205. ^ Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae, 25.3.3 ^ Lascaratos, John and Dionysios Voros. 2000 Fatal Wounding of the Byzantine Emperor Julian the Apostate (361–363 A.D.): Approach to the Contribution of Ancient Surgery. World Journal of Surgery 24: 615–619. See p. 618. ^ Grant, Michael. The Roman Emperors. (New York: Barnes and Noble Books, 1997), p. 254. ^ Libanius, Orations, 18.274 ^ John Malalas, Chronographia, pp. 333–334. Patrologia Graeca XCII, col. 496. ^ evidence preserved by Philostorgius, see David S. Potter, The Roman Empire at Bay AD 180–395, p. 518. ^ Sozomenus, Historia ecclesiastica, 6.2 ^ Theodoret, Historia ecclesiastica, 3.25 ^ Kathleen McVey (Editor), The Fathers of the Church: Selected Prose Works (1994) p. 31 ^ Libanius, Oration 18, 306; Ammianus Marcellinus 23, 2.5 and 25, 5.1. References from G. Downey,The tombs of the Byzantine emperors at the Church of the Holy Apostles in Constantinople, Journal of Hellenic Studies 79 (1959) p. 46 ^ Downey gives the text: '...later the body was transferred to the imperial city' (xiii 13, 25) ^ Glanville Downey, The tombs of the Byzantine emperors at the Church of the Holy Apostles in Constantinople, Journal of Hellenic Studies 79 (1959) 27–51. On p. 34 he states that the Book of Ceremonies of Constantine VII Porphyrogenitus gives a list of tombs, ending with: "43. In this stoa, which is to the north, lies a cylindrically-shaped sarcophagus, in which lies the cursed and wretched body of the apostate Julian, porphyry or Roman in colour. 44 Another sarcophagus, porphyry, or Roman, in which lies the body of Jovian, who ruled after Julian." ^ Vasiliev, A. A. (1948). "Imperial Porphyry Sarcophagi in Constantinople" (PDF). Dumbarton Oaks Papers. 4: 1+3–26. doi:10.2307/1291047. JSTOR 1291047. ^ The emperor's study of Iamblichus and of theurgy are a source of criticism from his primary chronicler, Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae, 22.13.6–8 and 25.2.5 ^ Tougher, Shaun (2007). Julian the Apostate. Edinburgh University Press. pp. 27ff, 58f. ISBN 9780748618873. ^ Julian, "Letter to a Priest", 292. Transl. W.C. Wright, v. 2, p. 307. ^ As above. Wright, v. 2, p. 305. ^ Julian, "Against the Galilaeans", 143. Transl. W.C. Wright, v. 3, p. 357. ^ Thomas F. Gossett, Race: The History of an Idea in America, 1963 (Southern Methodist University Press) /1997 (Oxford University Press, US), p. 8. ^ Socrates Scholasticus, Church History, iii, 21. ^ Gibbon, Edward. The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, Chapter 22. ^ a b Brown, Peter, The World of Late Antiquity, W. W. Norton, New York, 1971, p. 93. ^ Julian, Epistulae, 52.436A ff. ^ Richard T. Wallis, Jay Bregman (1992). Neoplatonism and Gnosticism. p. 22. ISBN 9780791413371. ^ Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae, 22.5.4. ^ See Roberts and DiMaio. ^ Adrian Murdoch, The Last Pagan (UK: Sutton Publishing Limited, 2003), 3. ^ Adrian Murdoch, The Last Pagan (UK: Sutton Publishing Limited, 2003), 4. ^ Scott Bradbury, "Julian's Pagan Revival and the Decline of Blood Sacrifice," Phoenix 49 (1995), 331. ^ Scott Bradbury, "Julian's Pagan Revival and the Decline of Blood Sacrifice," Phoenix 49 (1995). ^ a b Jonathan Kirsch, God against the Gods (New York: Penguin Group, 2004), 9. ^ Scott Bradbury, "Julian's Pagan Revival and the Decline of Blood Sacrifice," Phoenix 49 (1995): 333. ^ a b Scott Bradbury, "Julian's Pagan Revival and the Decline of Blood Sacrifice," Phoenix 49 (1995): 352. ^ Scott Bradbury, "Julian's Pagan Revival and the Decline of Blood Sacrifice," Phoenix 49 (1995): 354. ^ Harold Mattingly, “The Later Paganism,” The Harvard Theological Review 35 (1942): 178. ^ Harold Mattingly, “The Later Paganism,” The Harvard Theological Review 35 (1942): 171. ^ James O’Donnell, “The Demise of Paganism,” Traditio 35 (1979): 53, accessed September 23, 2014, JSTOR 27831060 ^ St. John Chrysostom, The Cult of the Saints (select homilies and letters), Wendy Mayer & Bronwen Neil, eds., St. Vladimir's Seminary Press (2006). ^ Quoted in : Schmidt, Charles (1889). The Social Results of Early Christianity (2 ed.). Wm. Isbister. p. 328. Retrieved 2013-02-09. ^ a b c Jacob Neusner (15 September 2008). Judaism and Christianity in the Age of Constantine: History, Messiah, Israel, and the Initial Confrontation. University of Chicago Press. pp. 21–22. ISBN 978-0-226-57647-3. ^ Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae, 23.1.2–3. ^ Kavon, Eli (4 December 2017). "Julian and the dream of a Third Temple". The Jerusalem Post. Retrieved 7 February 2018. ^ Encyclopaedia Britannica: Or, Dictionary of Arts, Sciences, and General Literature, Volume 8; Volume 12. Little, Brown & Company. 1856. p. 744. In A.D. 363, the Emperor Julian undertook to rebuild the temple, but after considerable preparations and much expense he was compelled to desist by flames which burst forth from the foundations. Repeated attempts have been made to account for these igneous explosions by natural causes; for instance, by the ignition of gases which had long been pent up in the subterraneous vaults. ^ Edward Gibbon, The Decline And Fall Of The Roman Empire, (The Modern Library), chapter XXIII., pp. 780–82, note 84 ^ See "Julian and the Jews 361–363 CE" (Fordham University, The Jesuit University of New York) and "Julian the Apostate and the Holy Temple" Archived 2005-10-20 at the Wayback Machine ^ Falk, Avner, A Psychoanalytic History of the Jews (1996), Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, London, ISBN 0-8386-3660-8. ^ a b Athanassiadi, p. 61. ^ Athanassiadi, pp. 62–63. ^ The manuscript tradition uses the name "Sallustius", but see Bowersock, p. 45 (footnote #12), and Athanassiadi, p. 20. ^ Athanassiadi, p. 85. ^ Athanassiadi, p. 90. ^ Athanassiadi, p. 131. ^ Athanassiadi, p. 141, "at the same time" as To The Cynic Heracleios. ^ Athanassiadi, p. 137. ^ Athanassiadi, p. 197, written for the Saturnalia festival, which began December 21. ^ "Julian: Caesars – translation". www.attalus.org. ^ Athanassiadi, p. 148, doesn't supply a clear date. Bowersock, p. 103, dates it to the celebration of Sol Invictus, December 25, shortly after the Caesars was written. ^ Athanassiadi, p. 201, dates it "towards the end of his stay in Antioch". ^ Athanassiadi, p. 161. – Wikisource:Against the Galileans ^ Wright, Wilmer (1923). Letters. Epigrams. Against the Galilaeans. Fragments. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. pp. xxvii–xxviii. ISBN 9781258198077. ^ Trapp, Michael (2012). Baker-Brian & Tougher, Nicholas & Shaun (ed.). The Emperor's Shadow: Julian in his Correspondence. Emperor and Author: The Writings of Julian the Apostate. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales. p. 105. ISBN 978-1905125500. ^ Wright, Wilmer (1923). Julian. Letters. Epigrams. Against the Galilaeans. Fragments. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. pp. 208-209. ISBN 978-0674991736. ^ Wright, Wilmer (1913). Julian, Volume II. Orations 6–8. Letters to Themistius. To The Senate and People of Athens. To a Priest. The Caesars. Misopogon. Loeb Classical Library (Book 29). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. p. 295. ISBN 978-0674990326. ^ Pearse, Roger (2003). "Oration 4: First Invective Against Julian". ^ Pearse, Roger (2003). "Oration 5: Second Invective Against Julian". ^ Wright, Wilmer (1923). Julian. Letters. Epigrams. Against the Galilaeans. Fragments. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. pp. 453–454. ISBN 9781258198077. ^ Wright, Wilmer (1913). Julian, Orations 6–8. Letters to Themistius, To the Senate and People of Athens, To a Priest. The Caesars. Misopogon. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. pp. 338–339. ISBN 978-0674990326. ^ Wright, Wilmer (1923). Julian. Letters. Epigrams. Against the Galilaeans. Fragments. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. pp. 60–61. ISBN 9781258198077. ^ Christopher Clark, "Iron Kingdom", p. 446 ^ Coustillas, Pierre ed. London and the Life of Literature in Late Victorian England: the Diary of George Gissing, Novelist. Brighton: Harvester Press, 1978, p. 237. Ancient sources[edit] Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae, Libri XV-XXV (books 15–25). See J.C. Rolfe, Ammianus Marcellinus, Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass., 1935/1985. 3 Volumes. Ammianus Marcellinus, The Roman History of Ammianus Marcellinus During the Reigns of the Emperors Constantius, Julian, Jovianus, Valentinian, and Valens. Translated by C. D. Yonge. Full text at Internet Archive at The Roman History of Ammianus Marcellinus During the Reigns of the Emperors Constantius, Julian, Jovianus, Valentinian, and Valens. Gutenberg etext# 28587. Julian the emperor: containing Gregory Nazianzen's two Invectives and Libanius' Monody : with Julian's extant theosophical works., Translated by C.W. King. George Bell and Sons, London, 1888. At the Internet Archive Claudius Mamertinus, "Gratiarum actio Mamertini de consulato suo Iuliano Imperatori", Panegyrici Latini, panegyric delivered in Constantinople in 362, also as a speech of thanks at his assumption of the office of consul of that year Gregory Nazianzen, Orations, "First Invective Against Julian", "Second Invective Against Julian". Both transl. C.W. King, 1888. Libanius, Monody — Funeral Oration for Julian the Apostate. Transl. C.W. King, 1888. Modern sources[edit] Athanassiadi, Polymnia (1992) [1981]. Julian: An Intellectual Biography. London: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-07763-X. Bowersock, G.W. (1978). Julian the Apostate. London: Duckworth. ISBN 0-7156-1262-X. Browning, Robert (1975). The Emperor Julian. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson. ISBN 0-297-77029-2. Dodgeon, Michael H. & Samuel N.C. Lieu, The Roman Eastern Frontier and the Persian Wars AD 226–363, Routledge, London, 1991. ISBN 0-203-42534-0 Drinkwater, John F., The Alamanni and Rome 213–496 (Caracalla to Clovis), OUP Oxford 2007. ISBN 0-19-929568-9 Lascaratos, John and Dionysios Voros. 2000 Fatal Wounding of the Byzantine Emperor Julian the Apostate (361–363 A.D.): Approach to the Contribution of Ancient Surgery. World Journal of Surgery 24: 615–619 Murdoch, Adrian. The Last Pagan: Julian the Apostate and the Death of the Ancient World, Stroud, 2005, ISBN 0-7509-4048-4 Phang, Sara E.; Spence, Iain; Kelly, Douglas; Londey, Peter, eds. (2016). Conflict in Ancient Greece and Rome: The Definitive Political, Social, and Military Encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO. Potter, David S. The Roman Empire at Bay AD 180–395, Routledge, New York, 2004. ISBN 0-415-10058-5 Ridley, R.T., "Notes on Julian's Persian Expedition (363)", Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte, Vol. 22, No. 2, 1973, pp. 317–330 Roberts, Walter E. & DiMaio, Michael (2002), "Julian the Apostate (360–363 A.D.)", De Imperatoribus Romanis Smith, Rowland. Julian's gods: religion and philosophy in the thought and action of Julian the Apostate, London, 1995. ISBN 0-415-03487-6 Veyne, Paul. L'Empire Gréco-Romain. Seuil, Paris, 2005. ISBN 2-02-057798-4 Wiemer, Hans-Ulrich & Stefan Rebenich, eds. (2020). A Companion to Julian the Apostate. Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-41456-3. Further reading[edit] Gardner, Alice, Julian Philosopher and Emperor and the Last Struggle of Paganism Against Christianity, G.P. Putnam's Son, London, 1895. ISBN 0-404-58262-1 / ISBN 978-0-404-58262-3. Downloadable at Julian, philosopher and emperor. Hunt, David. "Julian". In The Cambridge Ancient History, Volume 13 (Averil Cameron & Peter Garnsey editors). CUP, Cambridge, 1998. ISBN 0-521-30200-5 Kettenhofen, Erich (2009). "JULIAN". JULIAN – Encyclopaedia Iranica. Encyclopaedia Iranica, Vol. XV, Facs. 3. pp. 242–247. Lenski, Noel Emmanuel Failure of Empire: Valens and the Roman State in the Fourth Century AD University of California Press: London, 2003 Lieu, Samuel N.C. & Dominic Montserrat: editors, From Constantine to Julian: A Source History Routledge: New York, 1996. ISBN 0-203-42205-8 Neander, August, The Emperor Julian and His Generation, An Historical Picture, translated by G.V. Cox, John W. Parker, London, 1859. ISBN 0-217-34765-7 / ISBN 9780217347655. Downloadable at The Emperor Julian and his generation. Rendall, Gerald Henry, The Emperor Julian: Paganism and Christianity with Genealogical, Chronological and Bibliographical Appendices, George Bell and Sons, London, 1879. ISBN 1-152-51929-8 / ISBN 9781152519299. Downloadable at The Emperor Julian. Rohrbacher, David. Historians of Late Antiquity. Routledge: New York, 2002. ISBN 0-415-20459-3 Rosen, Klaus. Julian. Kaiser, Gott und Christenhasser. Klett-Cotta, Stuttgart, 2006. External links[edit] Wikisource has original works written by or about: Julian Wikiquote has quotations related to: Julian (emperor) Wikimedia Commons has media related to Flavius Claudius Julianus. Works by Julian at Project Gutenberg Laws of Julian. Two laws by Constantius II, while Julian was Caesar. Imperial Laws and Letters Involving Religion, some of which are by Julian relating to Christianity. A 4th century chalcedony portrait of Julian, Saint Petersburg, The State Hermitage Museum. Julian's Spin Doctor: The Persian Mutiny, Article by Adam J. Bravo. Rowland Smith's "Julian's Gods", Review by Thomas Banchich. Excerpt from by Adrian Murdoch, The Last Pagan at the California Literary Review. The Julian Society. A society of pagans who admire Julian. The Emperor Julian, Paganism and Christianity, by Gerald Henry Rendall Julian the Apostate why he was important, and his place in world history, by Andrew Selkirk Letters in Epistolographi graeci, R. Hercher (ed.), Parisiis, editore Ambrosio Firmin Didot, 1873, pp. 337–391. Entry in The Encyclopedia of Ancient History, doi:10.1002/9781444338386.wbeah12217 Julian (emperor) Constantinian dynasty Born: 331 Died: 26 June 363 Regnal titles Preceded by Constantius II Roman emperor 361–363 Succeeded by Jovian Political offices Preceded by Arbitio Lollianus Mavortius Consul of the Roman Empire 356–357 with Constantius II Succeeded by Neratius Cerealis Censorius Datianus Preceded by Flavius Eusebius Flavius Hypatius Consul of the Roman Empire 360 with Constantius II Succeeded by Taurus Florentius Preceded by Claudius Mamertinus Nevitta Consul of the Roman Empire 363 with Flavius Sallustius Succeeded by Jovian Varronianus v t e Roman and Byzantine emperors Principate 27 BC – AD 235 Augustus Tiberius Caligula Claudius Nero Galba Otho Vitellius Vespasian Titus Domitian Nerva Trajan Hadrian Antoninus Pius Marcus Aurelius Lucius Verus Commodus Pertinax Didius Julianus (Pescennius Niger) (Clodius Albinus) Septimius Severus Caracalla Geta Macrinus Diadumenian Elagabalus Severus Alexander Crisis 235–284 Maximinus Thrax Gordian I Gordian II Pupienus Balbinus Gordian III Philip the Arab Philip II Decius Herennius Etruscus Hostilian Trebonianus Gallus Volusianus Aemilianus Valerian Gallienus Saloninus Claudius Gothicus Quintillus Aurelian Tacitus Florian Probus Carus Carinus Numerian Gallic Emperors Postumus (Laelianus) Marius Victorinus (Domitianus II) Tetricus I with Tetricus II as caesar Dominate 284–395 Diocletian Maximian Galerius Constantius Chlorus Severus Constantine the Great Maxentius Licinius Maximinus Daia (Valerius Valens) (Martinian) Constantine II Constantius II Constans Magnentius Vetranio Julian Jovian Valentinian I (west) Valens (east) Gratian (west) Valentinian II (west) Theodosius I Magnus Maximus Victor (Eugenius) Western Empire 395–480 Honorius Constantine III with son Constans II Constantius III Joannes Valentinian III Petronius Maximus Avitus Majorian Libius Severus Anthemius Olybrius Glycerius Julius Nepos Romulus Augustulus Eastern/ Byzantine Empire 395–1204 Arcadius Theodosius II Marcian Leo the Thracian Leo II Zeno Basiliscus Marcus Anastasius I Dicorus Justin I Justinian the Great Justin II Tiberius II Constantine Maurice with son Theodosius as co-emperor Phocas Heraclius Constantine III Heraklonas Constans II Constantine IV with brothers Heraclius and Tiberius and then Justinian II as co-emperors Justinian II (first reign) Leontios Tiberius III Justinian II (second reign) with son Tiberius as co-emperor Philippikos Anastasios II Theodosius III Leo III the Isaurian Constantine V Artabasdos Leo IV the Khazar Constantine VI Irene Nikephoros I Staurakios Michael I Rangabe with son Theophylact as co-emperor Leo V the Armenian with Symbatios-Constantine as junior emperor Michael II the Amorian Theophilos Michael III Basil I the Macedonian Leo VI the Wise Alexander Constantine VII Porphyrogennetos Romanos I Lekapenos with sons Christopher, Stephen and Constantine as junior co-emperors Romanos II Nikephoros II Phokas John I Tzimiskes Basil II Constantine VIII Zoë (first reign) and Romanos III Argyros Zoë (first reign) and Michael IV the Paphlagonian Michael V Kalaphates Zoë (second reign) with Theodora Zoë (second reign) and Constantine IX Monomachos Constantine IX Monomachos (sole emperor) Theodora Michael VI Bringas Isaac I Komnenos Constantine X Doukas Romanos IV Diogenes Michael VII Doukas with brothers Andronikos and Konstantios and son Constantine Nikephoros III Botaneiates Alexios I Komnenos John II Komnenos with Alexios Komnenos as co-emperor Manuel I Komnenos Alexios II Komnenos Andronikos I Komnenos with John Komnenos as co-emperor Isaac II Angelos Alexios III Angelos Alexios IV Angelos Nicholas Kanabos (chosen by the Senate) Alexios V Doukas Empire of Nicaea 1204–1261 Constantine Laskaris Theodore I Laskaris John III Doukas Vatatzes Theodore II Laskaris John IV Laskaris Byzantine Empire 1261–1453 Michael VIII Palaiologos Andronikos II Palaiologos with Michael IX Palaiologos as co-emperor Andronikos III Palaiologos John V Palaiologos John VI Kantakouzenos with John V Palaiologos and Matthew Kantakouzenos as co-emperors John V Palaiologos Andronikos IV Palaiologos John VII Palaiologos Andronikos V Palaiologos Manuel II Palaiologos John VIII Palaiologos Constantine XI Palaiologos Italics indicates a junior co-emperor, while underlining indicates a usurper. v t e Platonists Academic Old Plato Aristotle Eudoxus Philip of Opus Aristonymus Coriscus and Erastus of Scepsis Demetrius of Amphipolis Euaeon of Lampsacus Heraclides and Python of Aenus Hestiaeus of Perinthus Lastheneia of Mantinea Timolaus of Cyzicus Speusippus Axiothea of Phlius Heraclides Ponticus Menedemus of Pyrrha Xenocrates Crantor Polemon Crates of Athens Skeptic Middle Arcesilaus Diocles of Cnidus Lacydes Telecles and Evander Hegesinus New Carneades Hagnon of Tarsus Metrodorus of Stratonicea Clitomachus Charmadas Aeschines of Neapolis Philo of Larissa Cicero Dio of Alexandria Middle Platonist Antiochus Philo of Alexandria Plutarch Justin Martyr Gaius Albinus Alcinous Apuleius Atticus Maximus of Tyre Numenius of Apamea Longinus Clement of Alexandria Origen the Pagan Calcidius Neoplatonist Ancient Ammonius Saccas Plotinus Disciples Origen Amelius Porphyry Iamblichus Sopater Eustathius of Cappadocia Sosipatra Aedesius Dexippus Chrysanthius Theodorus of Asine Julian Sallustius Maximus of Ephesus Eusebius of Myndus Priscus of Epirus Antoninus Gregory of Nyssa Hypatia Augustine Macrobius Academy Plutarch of Athens Asclepigenia Hierocles Syrianus Hermias Aedesia Proclus Ammonius Hermiae Asclepiodotus Hegias Zenodotus Marinus Agapius Isidore Damascius Simplicius Priscian Medieval Boethius John Philoponus Olympiodorus Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite John Scotus Eriugena Islamic Golden Age Al-Farabi Anselm Peter Abelard Chartres Bernard Gilbert Thierry Henry of Ghent Bonaventure Theodoric of Freiberg Meister Eckhart Berthold of Moosburg Paul of Venice Modern Renaissance Florentine Academy Plethon Marsilio Ficino Cristoforo Landino Giovanni Pico della Mirandola Cambridge Ralph Cudworth Henry More Anne Conway Petrus Ramus Giordano Bruno Blaise Pascal Emanuel Swedenborg German idealist Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Christian Wolff Moses Mendelssohn Immanuel Kant Johann Gottlieb Fichte Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling Arthur Schopenhauer G. W. F. Hegel Hermann Lotze Otto Weininger Thomas Taylor Ralph Waldo Emerson Josiah Royce Søren Kierkegaard Henri Bergson Aleksei Losev Contemporary Analytic Gottlob Frege G. E. Moore Kurt Gödel Alonzo Church Roderick Chisholm Michael Dummett W. V. O. Quine David Kaplan Saul Kripke Alvin Plantinga Peter van Inwagen Nicholas Wolterstorff Crispin Wright Edward N. Zalta Continental Edmund Husserl Roman Ingarden Leo Strauss Miscellaneous Philip K. Dick Joseph Ratzinger Bernard Bolzano Authority control BIBSYS: 90137776 BNE: XX1051260 BNF: cb121721673 (data) CANTIC: a10878099 CiNii: DA0131112X GND: 118558684 ISNI: 0000 0001 2134 5428 LCCN: n79067875 LNB: 000105493 NDL: 00620907 NKC: jn19990003922 NLA: 35799227 NLG: 19252 NLI: 000605003 NSK: 000294965 NTA: 06766668X RERO: 02-A000095969 SELIBR: 65361 SNAC: w6vf0182 SUDOC: 028722620 Trove: 1092646 VcBA: 495/19103 VIAF: 57406701 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n79067875 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Julian_(emperor)&oldid=995636849" Categories: Julian (emperor) 331 births 363 deaths 4th-century Byzantine emperors 4th-century Roman emperors 4th-century writers Byzantine-era pagans Claudii Constantinian dynasty Converts to pagan religions from Christianity Critics of Christianity Critics of the Catholic Church Flavii Greek-language writers Imperial Roman consuls Julian's Persian War Neoplatonists Pagan restorations People of the Roman–Sasanian Wars Persecution of Christians Roman emperors killed in battle Roman philhellenes Roman-era students in Athens Hidden categories: Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica with Wikisource reference Webarchive template wayback links Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata Articles containing Latin-language text Articles containing Greek-language text Articles containing Ancient Greek (to 1453)-language text All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from December 2016 Articles with unsourced statements from September 2013 Articles needing additional references from June 2019 All articles needing additional references Commons link is locally defined Articles with Project Gutenberg links Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CANTIC identifiers Wikipedia articles with CINII identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with LNB identifiers Wikipedia articles with NDL identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLG identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLI identifiers Wikipedia articles with NSK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with RERO identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SNAC-ID identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with Trove identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikiquote Wikisource Languages Afrikaans Alemannisch العربية Aragonés Արեւմտահայերէն Azərbaycanca تۆرکجه Bân-lâm-gú Беларуская Български Brezhoneg Català Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français Frysk Galego 客家語/Hak-kâ-ngî 한국어 Հայերեն Hrvatski Bahasa Indonesia Interlingua Íslenska Italiano עברית ქართული Kiswahili Кыргызча Latina Latviešu Lietuvių La .lojban. Magyar Македонски Malagasy मराठी مصرى Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Plattdüütsch Polski Português Română Русский Sicilianu Slovenčina Slovenščina Словѣньскъ / ⰔⰎⰑⰂⰡⰐⰠⰔⰍⰟ Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Tagalog Татарча/tatarça Türkçe Українська Tiếng Việt Winaray 吴语 Yorùbá 粵語 Zazaki 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 22 December 2020, at 02:41 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1679 ---- Philostratus - Wikipedia Philostratus From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Lucius Flavius Philostratus, Greek sophist of Roman imperial period For other people named Philostratus, see Philostratus (disambiguation). Philostratus or Lucius Flavius Philostratus (/fɪˈlɒstrətəs/; Greek: Φλάβιος Φιλόστρατος;[1] c. 170 – 247/250 AD), called "the Athenian", was a Greek sophist of the Roman imperial period. His father was a minor sophist of the same name. He was born probably around 170, and is said by the Suda to have been living in the reign of emperor Philip the Arab (244–249). His death possibly occurred in Tyre c. 250 AD. Contents 1 Name and identity 2 Works attributed to Philostratus 3 Translations 4 Notes 5 References 6 Further reading 7 External links Name and identity[edit] Some ambiguity surrounds his name. The praenomen Flavius is given in The Lives of the Sophists and Tzetzes. Eunapius and Synesius call him a Lemnian; Photius a Tyrian; his letters refer to him as an Athenian. It is probable that he was born in Lemnos, studied and taught at Athens, and then settled in Rome (where he would naturally be called Atheniensis) as a member of the learned circle with which empress Julia Domna surrounded herself. Works attributed to Philostratus[edit] Historians agree that Philostratus authored at least five works: Life of Apollonius of Tyana (Τὰ ἐς τὸν Τυανέα Ἀπολλώνιον; Latin: Vita Apollonii), Lives of the Sophists (Βίοι Σοφιστῶν), Gymnasticus (Γυμναστικός), Heroicus (Ἡρωικός) and Epistolae (Ἐπιστολαί). Another work, Imagines (Εἰκόνες), is usually assigned to his son-in-law Philostratus of Lemnos. Heroicus (On Heroes, 213–214 AD) is in the form of a dialogue between a Phoenician traveler and a vine-tender or groundskeeper (ἀμπελουργός ampelourgos), regarding Protesilaus (or "Protosilaos"), the first Achaean warrior to be killed at the siege of Troy, as described in The Iliad. The dialogue extends into a discussion and critique of Homer's presentation of heroes and gods, based on the greater authority of the dead Protosileus, who lives after death and communicates with the ampelourgos. Heroicus includes Achilles' "Ode to Echo".[2] Life of Apollonius of Tyana, written between 217 and 238 AD, tells the story of Apollonius of Tyana (c. 40 – c. 120 AD), a Pythagorean philosopher and teacher. Philostratus wrote the book for Julia Domna, wife of Septimius Severus and mother of Caracalla. The book was completed after her death. Lives of the Sophists, written between 231 and 237 AD, is a semi-biographical history of the Greek sophists. The book is dedicated to a consul Antonius Gordianus, perhaps one of the two Gordians who were killed in 238. The work is divided into two parts: the first dealing with the ancient Sophists, e.g. Gorgias, the second with the later school, e.g. Herodes Atticus. The Lives are not in the true sense biographical, but rather picturesque impressions of leading representatives of an attitude of mind full of curiosity, alert and versatile, but lacking scientific method, preferring the external excellence of style and manner to the solid achievements of serious writing. The philosopher, as he says, investigates truth; the sophist embellishes it, and takes it for granted. Gymnasticus, written after 220 AD, contains accounts concerning the Olympic games and athletic contests in general. Epistolae, or Love Letters, breathe the spirit of the New Comedy and the Alexandrine poets; portions of Letter 33 are almost literally translated in Ben Jonson's Song to Celia, "Drink to Me Only with Thine Eyes." The letters are mainly of an erotic character. Their publication date is unknown. Internal evidence confirms that the authors of Life of Apollonius and Lives of the Sophists are one and the same.[citation needed] The Lives of the Sophists was to have an enormous impact upon later writers, particularly Neoplatonists.[citation needed] Translations[edit] Alciphron, Aelian, and Philostratus, The Letters. Translated by A. R. Benner, F. H. Fobes. 1949. Loeb Classical Library. ISBN 978-0-674-99421-8 Philostratus, Lives of the Sophists. Eunapius, Lives of the Philosophers and Sophists. Translated by Wilmer C. Wright. 1921. Loeb Classical Library. ISBN 978-0-674-99149-1 Philostratus, Apollonius of Tyana. 3 volumes. Translated by Christopher P. Jones. 2005-6. Loeb Classical Library. ISBN 978-0-674-99613-7, ISBN 978-0-674-99614-4, and ISBN 978-0-674-99617-5 Philostratus, Heroicus; Gymnasticus; Discourses 1 and 2. Edited and translated by Jeffrey Rusten and Jason König. Loeb Classical Library. (Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England, 2014). Philostratos, Leben der Sophisten. Greek and German by Kai Brodersen. Wiesbaden: Marix 2014, ISBN 978-3-86539-368-5 Philostratos, Sport in der Antike (Peri Gymnastikes). Greek and German by Kai Brodersen. Wiesbaden: Marix, 2015, ISBN 978-3-7374-0961-2. Notes[edit] ^ Flavius Philostratus, Phlauiu Philostratu Bioi sophistōn, Mohr, 1838, p. xxv. ^ Sophia Papaioannou, Redesigning Achilles: 'Recycling' the Epic Cycle in the 'Little Iliad' (Ovid, Metamorphoses 12.1-13.622). Berlin/New York. Paul, George M. (1982) - 2007 Page 153 "Nagy's article comments on an interesting but little known literary reception of Achilles, namely his representation as a lyric poet and lyre-player, singing a song to Echo (a code name for the Muse) in the company of Helen of Troy. ... and the two heroes, now souls distanced from their epic lives/roles, have become bards who sing of their own deeds. Cf. Maclean and Aitken above for a translation of the Heroicus, including Achilles' 'Ode to Echo'." References[edit]  This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Philostratus". Encyclopædia Britannica. 21 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 445. Further reading[edit] Aitken, Ellen Bradshaw, and Jennifer Kay Berenson MacLean, eds. 2004. Philostratus’s “Heroikos”: Religion and Cultural Identity in the Third Century C.E. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature. Bowie, Ewen L., and Jaś Elsner, eds. 2009. Philostratus. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press. Bryson, Norman. 1994. "Philostratus and the Imaginary Museum." In Art and Text in Ancient Greek Culture. Edited by Simon Goldhill and Robin Osborne, 255–283. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press. Elsner, Jaś. 2009. "Beyond Compare: Pagan Saint and Christian God in Late Antiquity." Critical Inquiry 35:655–683. Eshleman, Kendra Joy. 2008. "Defining the Circle of Sophists: Philostratus and the Construction of the Second Sophistic." Classical Philology 103:395–413. Demoen, K., and Danny Praet, eds. 2009. Theios Sophistes: Essays on Flavius Philostratus’ “Vita Apollonii.” Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. Kemezis, Adam M. 2014. Greek Narratives of the Roman Empire under the Severans: Cassius Dio, Philostratus and Herodian. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press. König, Jason. 2014. "Images of Elite Communities in Philostratus: Re-Reading the Preface to the “Lives of the Sophists.”" In Roman Rule in Greek and Latin Writing: Double Vision. Edited by Jesper Majbom Madsen and Roger Rees, 246–270. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. Potter, David. 2011. The Victor’s Crown: A History of Ancient Sport from Homer to Byzantium. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. Walker, Andrew. 1992. "Eros and the Eye in the Love-Letters of Philostratus." Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 38:132–148. External links[edit] Wikisource has original works written by or about: Philostratus Wikiquote has quotations related to: Philostratus Library resources about Philostratus Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries By Philostratus Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries Livius, Philostratus Updates the subsequent article with some ninety years of more recent research. Online Text: Philostratus, On Heroes (Heroicus) translated by Ellen Bradshaw Aitken and Jennifer K. Berenson Maclean. Online Text: Philostratus, Life of Apollonius of Tyana translated by F. C. Conybeare Flavius Philostratus entry in historical sourcebook with fresh translations of excerpts from the Life of Apollonius by Mahlon H. Smith Imagines in National Széchényi Library, Budapest Works by or about Philostratus at Internet Archive Works by Philostratus at LibriVox (public domain audiobooks) Flavii Philostrati opera, C. L. Kayser (edit.), 2 voll., Lipsiae, in aedibus B. G. Teubneri, 1870-71: Life of Apollonius: vol. 1 pp. 1-344. Lives of the sophists: vol. 2 pp. 1-127. Heroicus: vol. 2 pp. 128-219. Epistolae: vol. 2 pp. 225-260. Gymnasticus: vol. 2 pp. 261-293. Philostratorum et Callistrati opera, Eunapii vitae sophistarum, Himerii sophistae declamationes, A. Westermann, Jo. Fr. Boissoade, Fr. Dübner (ed.), Parisiis, editore Ambrosio Firmin Didot, 1849, pp. 1-194 (Life of Apollonius), pp. 195-265 (Lives of the Sophists), pp. 267-319 (Heroicus), pp. 320-338 (Epistolae). v t e Platonists Academic Old Plato Aristotle Eudoxus Philip of Opus Aristonymus Coriscus and Erastus of Scepsis Demetrius of Amphipolis Euaeon of Lampsacus Heraclides and Python of Aenus Hestiaeus of Perinthus Lastheneia of Mantinea Timolaus of Cyzicus Speusippus Axiothea of Phlius Heraclides Ponticus Menedemus of Pyrrha Xenocrates Crantor Polemon Crates of Athens Skeptic Middle Arcesilaus Diocles of Cnidus Lacydes Telecles and Evander Hegesinus New Carneades Hagnon of Tarsus Metrodorus of Stratonicea Clitomachus Charmadas Aeschines of Neapolis Philo of Larissa Cicero Dio of Alexandria Middle Platonist Antiochus Philo of Alexandria Plutarch Justin Martyr Gaius Albinus Alcinous Apuleius Atticus Maximus of Tyre Numenius of Apamea Longinus Clement of Alexandria Origen the Pagan Calcidius Neoplatonist Ancient Ammonius Saccas Plotinus Disciples Origen Amelius Porphyry Iamblichus Sopater Eustathius of Cappadocia Sosipatra Aedesius Dexippus Chrysanthius Theodorus of Asine Julian Sallustius Maximus of Ephesus Eusebius of Myndus Priscus of Epirus Antoninus Gregory of Nyssa Hypatia Augustine Macrobius Academy Plutarch of Athens Asclepigenia Hierocles Syrianus Hermias Aedesia Proclus Ammonius Hermiae Asclepiodotus Hegias Zenodotus Marinus Agapius Isidore Damascius Simplicius Priscian Medieval Boethius John Philoponus Olympiodorus Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite John Scotus Eriugena Islamic Golden Age Al-Farabi Anselm Peter Abelard Chartres Bernard Gilbert Thierry Henry of Ghent Bonaventure Theodoric of Freiberg Meister Eckhart Berthold of Moosburg Paul of Venice Modern Renaissance Florentine Academy Plethon Marsilio Ficino Cristoforo Landino Giovanni Pico della Mirandola Cambridge Ralph Cudworth Henry More Anne Conway Petrus Ramus Giordano Bruno Blaise Pascal Emanuel Swedenborg German idealist Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Christian Wolff Moses Mendelssohn Immanuel Kant Johann Gottlieb Fichte Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling Arthur Schopenhauer G. W. F. Hegel Hermann Lotze Otto Weininger Thomas Taylor Ralph Waldo Emerson Josiah Royce Søren Kierkegaard Henri Bergson Aleksei Losev Contemporary Analytic Gottlob Frege G. E. Moore Kurt Gödel Alonzo Church Roderick Chisholm Michael Dummett W. V. O. Quine David Kaplan Saul Kripke Alvin Plantinga Peter van Inwagen Nicholas Wolterstorff Crispin Wright Edward N. Zalta Continental Edmund Husserl Roman Ingarden Leo Strauss Miscellaneous Philip K. Dick Joseph Ratzinger Bernard Bolzano Authority control BIBSYS: 95004118 BNE: XX879327 BNF: cb13092089h (data) CANTIC: a11741375 GND: 118594044 ICCU: IT\ICCU\CFIV\058110 ISNI: 0000 0001 3927 7072 LCCN: n50012277 NKC: skuk0002440 NLK: KAC201902689 NTA: 068574592 SELIBR: 258126 SUDOC: 030324149 VcBA: 495/52674 VIAF: 250889454 WorldCat Identities: viaf-250889454 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Philostratus&oldid=969488799" Categories: Roman-era Sophists Roman-era philosophers in Athens Roman-era Athenian rhetoricians 2nd-century Romans 3rd-century Romans 2nd-century Greek people 3rd-century Greek people People from Lemnos 170s births 250s deaths Flavii Hidden categories: Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata Articles containing Ancient Greek (to 1453)-language text Articles containing Latin-language text All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from October 2007 Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica with Wikisource reference Wikipedia articles incorporating text from the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica Articles with Internet Archive links Articles with LibriVox links Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CANTIC identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ICCU identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikiquote Wikisource Languages العربية Български Brezhoneg Català Deutsch Ελληνικά Español فارسی Français Hrvatski Bahasa Indonesia Italiano עברית Latina Mirandés Nederlands 日本語 Polski Português Русский Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Türkçe Українська Edit links This page was last edited on 25 July 2020, at 18:59 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1686 ---- Heiric of Auxerre - Wikipedia Heiric of Auxerre From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search This article may be expanded with text translated from the corresponding article in French. (May 2009) Click [show] for important translation instructions. View a machine-translated version of the French article. Machine translation like DeepL or Google Translate is a useful starting point for translations, but translators must revise errors as necessary and confirm that the translation is accurate, rather than simply copy-pasting machine-translated text into the English Wikipedia. Do not translate text that appears unreliable or low-quality. If possible, verify the text with references provided in the foreign-language article. You must provide copyright attribution in the edit summary accompanying your translation by providing an interlanguage link to the source of your translation. A model attribution edit summary Content in this edit is translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Heiric d'Auxerre]]; see its history for attribution. You should also add the template {{Translated|fr|Heiric d'Auxerre}} to the talk page. For more guidance, see Wikipedia:Translation. Heiric of Auxerre[1] (841–876) was a French Benedictine theologian and writer. He was an oblate of the monastery of St. Germanus of Auxerre from a young age. He studied with Servatus Lupus and Haymo of Auxerre. His own students included Remigius of Auxerre and Hucbald. His Miracula sancti Germani was a verse life of St. Germanus. Other works include his Collectaeum,[2] a homiliary, and glosses on the Categoriae decem. Notes[edit] ^ Heiricus Autissiodorensis or Altissiodorensis, Eric of Auxerre. ^ ... a florilegium consisting mainly of extracts from classical authors, particularly Valerius Maximus, Rosamond McKitterick, The Frankish Kingdoms under the Carolingians (1983), p. 290. External links[edit] Friedrich Wilhelm Bautz (1990). "Heiric of Auxerre". In Bautz, Friedrich Wilhelm (ed.). Biographisch-Bibliographisches Kirchenlexikon (BBKL) (in German). 2. Hamm: Bautz. col. 689. ISBN 3-88309-032-8. Chapter on the School of Auxerre from The History of Philosophy by William Turner, 1903. Heiric of Auxerre's labyrinth Authority control BIBSYS: 90668480 BNF: cb12176434x (data) CiNii: DA06761214 GND: 119215888 ISNI: 0000 0000 7978 2156 LCCN: nr91031758 NKC: jn20031125012 NLP: A27052230 NTA: 097190799 RERO: 02-A000079319 SELIBR: 190387 SUDOC: 030325749 VcBA: 495/25317 VIAF: 77120804 WorldCat Identities: lccn-nr91031758 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Heiric_of_Auxerre&oldid=845090256" Categories: 841 births 876 deaths 9th-century Latin writers Writers of the Carolingian Empire French Benedictines Medieval French theologians 9th-century people from West Francia Hidden categories: Use dmy dates from July 2013 Articles to be expanded from May 2009 All articles to be expanded Articles needing translation from French Wikipedia CS1 German-language sources (de) Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CINII identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLP identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with RERO identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Asturianu Català Deutsch Español Français Italiano Magyar مصرى Nederlands Slovenčina Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Edit links This page was last edited on 9 June 2018, at 08:58 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1698 ---- Ennius - Wikipedia Ennius From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Roman writer Ennius Double herm with the portrait of the Roman poets Virgil or Ennius Born Quintus Ennius c. 239 BC Rudiae, Roman Republic Died c. 169 BC Occupation Poet Nationality Roman Genre Epic poetry Quintus Ennius (Latin pronunciation: [ˈkᶣiːnt̪ʊs̺ ˈɛnːijʊs̺]; c. 239 – c. 169 BC) was a writer and poet who lived during the Roman Republic. He is often considered the father of Roman poetry. He was born in Rudiae,[1] formerly a small town located near modern Lecce in the heel of Italy (ancient Calabria, today Salento), and could speak Oscan as well as Latin and Greek. Although only fragments of his works survive, his influence in Latin literature was significant, particularly in his use of Greek literary models. Contents 1 Biography 2 Literature 2.1 The Annales 2.2 Minor works 3 Editions 4 See also 5 Footnotes 5.1 Bibliography 6 Further reading 7 External links Biography[edit] Very little is reliably known about the life of Ennius. His contemporaries hardly mentioned him and much that is related about him could have been embroidered from references to himself in his now fragmentary writings.[2] Some lines of the Annales, as well as ancient testimonies, for example, suggest that Ennius opened his epic with a recollection of a dream in which the ancient epic-writer Homer informed him that his spirit had been reborn into Ennius.[3] It is true that the doctrine of the transmigration of souls once flourished in the areas of Italy settled by Greeks, but the statement might have been no more than a literary flourish. Ennius seems to have been given to making large claims, as in the report by Maurus Servius Honoratus that he claimed descent from Messapus, the legendary king of his native district.[4] The partly Hellenised city of Rudiae, his place of birth, was certainly in the area settled by the Messapians. And this, he used to say, according to Aulus Gellius, had endowed him with a triple linguistic and cultural heritage, fancifully described as "three hearts… Greek, Oscan and Latin”.[5] The public career of Ennius first really emerges in middle life, when he was serving in the army with the rank of centurion during the Second Punic War. While in Sardinia in the year 204 BC, he is said to have attracted the attention of Cato the Elder and was taken by him to Rome. There he taught Greek and adapted Greek plays for a livelihood, and by his poetical compositions gained the friendship of some of the greatest men in Rome whose achievements he praised. Amongst these were Scipio Africanus and Fulvius Nobilior, whom he accompanied on his Aetolian campaign (189). Afterwards he made the capture of Ambracia, at which he was present, the subject of a play and of an episode in the Annales. It was through the influence of Nobilior's son Quintus that Ennius subsequently obtained Roman citizenship. But he himself lived plainly and simply in the literary quarter on the Aventine Hill with the poet Caecilius Statius, a fellow adapter of Greek plays. At about the age of 70 Ennius died, immediately after producing his tragedy Thyestes. In the last book of his epic poem, in which he seems to have given various details of his personal history, he mentioned that he was in his 67th year at the date of its composition. He compared himself, in contemplation of the close of the great work of his life, to a gallant horse which, after having often won the prize at the Olympic Games, obtained his rest when weary with age. A similar feeling of pride at the completion of a great career is expressed in the memorial lines which he composed to be placed under his bust after death: “Let no one weep for me, or celebrate my funeral with mourning; for I still live, as I pass to and fro through the mouths of men.”[6] Literature[edit] Ennius continued the nascent literary tradition by writing plays in Greek and Roman style (praetextae and palliatae), as well as his most famous work, a historic epic in hexameters called the Annales. Other minor works include the Epicharmus, Epigrammata, the Euhemerus, the Hedyphagetica, Praecepta/Protrepticus, Saturae (or Satires), Scipio, and Sota.[7] The Annales[edit] The Annales was an epic poem in fifteen books, later expanded to eighteen, covering Roman history from the fall of Troy in 1184 BC down to the censorship of Cato the Elder in 184 BC. It was the first Latin poem to adopt the dactylic hexameter metre used in Greek epic and didactic poetry,[8] leading it to become the standard metre for these genres in Latin poetry. The Annals became a school text for Roman schoolchildren, eventually supplanted by Virgil's Aeneid. About 600 lines survive. A copy of the work is among the Latin rolls of the Herculaneum library. Minor works[edit] The Epicharmus was inspired by the philosophical hypotheses developed by the Sicilian poet and philosopher Epicharmus of Kos, after which Ennius's work took its name.[9][10] In the Epicharmus, the poet describes a dream he had in which he died and was transported to some place of heavenly enlightenment. Here, he met Epicharmus, who explained the nature of the gods and taught Ennius the physics of the universe.[11] The Euhemerus presented a theological doctrine based on the ideas Greek of Euhemerus of Messene, who argued that the gods of Olympus were not supernatural powers that interference in the lives of humans, but rather heroes of old who after death were eventually regarded as deities due to their valor, bravery, or cultural impact (this belief is now known as euhemerism). Both Cicero and Lactantius write that the Euhemerus was a "translat[ion] and a recount[ing]" of Euhemerus's original work the Sacred History, but it is unclear if this means Ennius simply translated the original from Greek into Latin, or added in his own elements. Most of what is preserved of this work comes to us from Lactantius, and these snippets suggest that the Euhemerus was a prose text.[12] The Hedyphagetica took much of its substance from the gastronomical epic of Archestratus of Gela. The extant portions of Ennius's poem discuss where a reader might find the best type of fish. Most of the fragments, replete with unique terms for fish and numerous place names, are corrupt or damaged. The Hedyphagetica is written in hexameters, but differs from the Annales in regards to "metrical practices"; this difference is largely due to each works' distinct subject matter.[13] The titles Praecepta and Protrepticus were likely used to refer to the same (possibly exhortatory) work. However, given this work's almost non-existent nature (only the word pannibus—an "unusual" form of the word pannis, meaning "rags"—is preserved in the work of the Latin grammarian Charisius), this position is extremely difficult to verify.[7][14] The Saturae is a collection of about thirty lines from satirical poems—making it the first extant instance of Roman satire.[7] These lines are written in a variety of poetic metres.[7][15] The poems in this collection "were mostly concerned with practical wisdom, often driving home a lesson with the help of a fable."[9] Ennius's Scipio was a work (possibly a panegyric poem) that apparently celebrated the life and deeds of Scipio Africanus. Hardly anything remains of this work, and what is preserved is embedded in the works of others. Unfortunately, "no quotation of [Scipio] supplies a context".[16] Some have proposed that the work was written before the Annales, and others have said that the work was written after Scipio's 201 BC triumph that followed the Battle of Zama (202 BC).[16] The Sota was a poem, potentially of some length, named after the Greek poet Sotades. The work, which followed a metre established by Sotades known as the "Sotadeus", concerned itself with a number of disparate topics and ideas.[17] Editions[edit] Quinto Ennio. Le opere minori, Vol. I. Praecepta, Protrepticus, Saturae, Scipio, Sota. Ed., tr., comm. Alessandro Russo. Pisa: Edizioni ETS, 2007 (Testi e studi di cultura classica, 40). Warmington, E. H. (1935). Ennius (Q. Ennius). Remains of Old Latin. Edited by Eric Herbert Warmington. Vol. 2: Ennius and Caecilius. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. See also[edit] Ancient Rome portal Latin literature List of ancient Romans Prosody (Latin) Footnotes[edit] ^ Smith (1852), p. 359. "Rudiae is celebrated as the birthplace of Ennius." ^ E. Badian, “Ennius and his Friends” in Ennius, Fondation Hardt, Geneva 1972, pp.149-99 ^ Aicher (1989), pp. 227–32. ^ Commentary on the Aeneid, vii. 691 ^ Noctes Atticae 17.17.1 ^ Most of this section is drawn from the 1911 edition of the Encyclopaedia Britannica ^ a b c d La Barbera (2014). ^ "FJCL Latin Literature Study Guide" (PDF). Florida Junior Classical League. Retrieved 2 March 2014. ^ a b Editors of Encyclopædia Britannica (2016). ^ Ennius, Goldberg, & Manuwald (2018), pp. 220–21. ^ Merry (1891), p. 65. ^ Ennius, Goldberg, & Manuwald (2018), pp. 238–40. ^ Ennius, Goldberg, & Manuwald (2018), pp. 260–61. ^ Ennius, Goldberg, & Manuwald (2018), pp. 268–69. ^ Ennius, Goldberg, & Manuwald (2018), pp. 270–71. ^ a b Ennius, Goldberg, & Manuwald (2018), pp. 286–87. ^ Ennius, Goldberg, & Manuwald (2018), pp. 296–97. Bibliography[edit] Aicher, Peter (Summer 1989). "Ennius' Dream of Homer". The American Journal of Philology. 110 (2): 227–232. doi:10.2307/295173. JSTOR 295173. Editors of Encyclopædia Britannica (February 10, 2016). "Ennius". Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Retrieved August 1, 2018.CS1 maint: extra text: authors list (link) Ennius (2018). Goldberg, Sander M.; Manuwald, Gesine (eds.). Fragmentary Republican Latin. Volume II: Ennius, Dramatic Fragments. Minor Works. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. La Barbera, Sandro (August 26, 2014). "Ennius". Oxford Bibliographies. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/obo/9780195389661-0172. Retrieved August 1, 2018. Merry, William Walter, ed. (1891). Selected Fragments of Roman Poetry: From the Earliest Times of the Republic to the Augustan Age. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press. Smith, William (1852). "Rudiae". A Smaller Classical Dictionary. London, UK: John Murray. Retrieved August 1, 2018. Further reading[edit] Bettini, M. (1979). Studi e note su Ennio. Pisa: Giardini. Brooks, R. A. (1981). Ennius and Roman Tragedy. New York: Arno Press. ISBN 0-405-14030-4. Elliott, J. (2009). "Ennius' 'Cunctator' and the History of a Gerund in the Roman Historiographical Tradition". The Classical Quarterly. 59 (2): 532–42. doi:10.1017/S0009838809990164. Elliott, J. (2010). "Ennius as Universal Historian: The Case of the Annales." Historiae Mundi: Studies in Universal History. Ed. Peter Liddel and Andrew Fear. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 148–161. Evans, R.L.S. (1999). "Ennius". In Briggs, Ward (ed.). Ancient Roman Writers. Dictionary of Literary Biography. 211. Fisher, J. (2014). The 'Annals' of Quintus Ennius and the Italic Tradition. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Fitzgerald, W., and Emily Gowers, eds. (2007). Ennius Perennis. The Annals and Beyond. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philolological Society, Supplementary Volume 31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Goldberg, S. M. (1995). Epic in Republican Rome. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-509372-0. Goldberg, Sander M. (1989). "Poetry, Politics, and Ennius". Transactions of the American Philological Association. 119: 247–261. doi:10.2307/284274. JSTOR 284274. Goldschmidt, N. (2012). "Absent Presence: Pater Ennius in Renaissance Europe". Classical Receptions Journal. 4: 1–19. doi:10.1093/crj/clr011. Goldschmidt, Nora (2013). "Shaggy Crowns". doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199681297.001.0001. ISBN 9780199681297. Cite journal requires |journal= (help) Jocelyn, H. D. Ennius (Q. Ennius). (1967). The Tragedies of Ennius: The Fragments. Edited by Henry David Jocelyn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Jocelyn, Henry David (1972). "The Poems of Quintus Ennius". Recht, Religion, Sprache und Literatur (Bis zum Ende des 2. Jahrhunderts v. CHR.). doi:10.1515/9783110836417-036. ISBN 9783110836417. Morgan, Llewelyn (2014). "A Metrical Scandal in Ennius". The Classical Quarterly. 64: 152–159. doi:10.1017/S0009838813000608. Sciarrino, Enrica (2006). "The Introduction of Epic in Rome: Cultural Thefts and Social Contests". Arethusa. 39 (3): 449–469. doi:10.1353/are.2006.0029. Skutsch, O. (1968). Studia Enniana. London: Athlone. Ennius, Quintus (1985). Skutsch, Otto (ed.). The Annals of Quintus Ennius. p. 70. doi:10.1093/oseo/instance.00075748. ISBN 9780198144489. External links[edit] Library resources about Ennius Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries By Ennius Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries Quotations related to Ennius at Wikiquote  Latin Wikisource has original text related to this article: Ennius Media related to Quintus Ennius at Wikimedia Commons Fragments of Ennius' Annals at The Latin Library; text from Wordsworth (1874), line numbering from Warmington (1935) Ennius' Annales: text and translation of all fragments at attalus.org; adapted from Warmington (1935) Ennius: translation of selected fragments at elfinspell.com; from Specimens of the Poets and Poetry of Greece and Rome by Various Translators (1847) Remains of old latin. Vol. 1: Aennius and Caecilius, E. H. Warmington (a cura di), Cambridge-London, 1935, pagg. 1-465.  This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Ennius, Quintus". Encyclopædia Britannica. 9 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 648–49. v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films Authority control BIBSYS: 90066504 BNE: XX977849 BNF: cb120078470 (data) CiNii: DA02903430 GND: 118682105 ISNI: 0000 0001 0920 8922 LCCN: n79109712 NKC: ola2002161271 NLG: 228698 NSK: 000117903 NTA: 068035470 SELIBR: 185267 SNAC: w6k45rvp SUDOC: 028193776 VcBA: 495/44519 VIAF: 84976347 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n79109712 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ennius&oldid=996438977" Categories: People from the Province of Lecce Ancient Roman tragic dramatists Old Latin-language writers Latin-language writers Epic poets 3rd-century BC poets 2nd-century BC poets 2nd-century BC Romans 3rd-century BC Romans 230s BC births 160s BC deaths Ennii Italic people Hidden categories: Articles with short description Short description matches Wikidata CS1 maint: extra text: authors list CS1: long volume value CS1 errors: missing periodical Commons category link from Wikidata Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica with Wikisource reference Wikipedia articles incorporating text from the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CINII identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLG identifiers Wikipedia articles with NSK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SNAC-ID identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikiquote Languages العربية Asturianu Bân-lâm-gú Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ Български Català Čeština Deutsch Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français Furlan Galego 한국어 Հայերեն हिन्दी Ido Bahasa Indonesia Íslenska Italiano ქართული Latina Latviešu Lingua Franca Nova Magyar Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Polski Português Română Русский Seeltersk Shqip Sicilianu Slovenčina Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Türkçe Українська 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 26 December 2020, at 16:49 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1705 ---- Boethius - Wikipedia Boethius From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Roman senator, magister officiorum and philosopher of the early 6th century For other people named Boethius, see Boethius (disambiguation). Anicius Manlius Severinus Boëthius Boethius teaching his students (initial in a 1385 Italian manuscript of the Consolation of Philosophy) Born c. 477[1] Rome, Kingdom of Odoacer Died 524 (aged about 44) Pavia, Ostrogothic Kingdom Notable work The Consolation of Philosophy Era Medieval philosophy Region Western philosophy School Neoplatonism Main interests problem of universals, theology, music Notable ideas The Wheel of Fortune Influences Plato, Aristotle, Cicero, Seneca, Plotinus, Porphyry, Saint Augustine, Proclus Influenced All Medieval philosophy (notably Johannes Scotus Eriugena, Peter Abelard, Anselm of Canterbury,[2] Saint Albert the Great, Saint Thomas Aquinas, Dante Alighieri) Blessed Severinus Boethius Born Rome, Kingdom of Odoacer Died Pavia, Ostrogothic Kingdom Venerated in Roman Catholic Diocese of Pavia Major shrine San Pietro in Ciel d'Oro, Pavia, Italy Feast 23 October (Orthodox Tradition) Influences Augustine of Hippo Influenced Thomas Aquinas Part of a series on Neoplatonism Reconstructed bust believed to represent Plotinus Concepts Theory of Forms Form of the Good Demiurge Henosis Microcosm and macrocosm Nous Arche Logos Hypostasis Works Enneads De Mysteriis Aegyptiorum Liber de Causis The City of God The Consolation of Philosophy De Coelesti Hierarchia De divisione naturae People Plato Ammonius Saccas Plotinus (disciples) Origen Porphyry Iamblichus Julian the Apostate Sallustius Hypatia Plutarch of Athens Macrobius Augustine of Hippo Syrianus Proclus Pseudo-Dionysius Damascius Simplicius of Cilicia Boethius Maximus the Confessor Johannes Scotus Eriugena Al-Farabi Brethren of Purity Solomon ibn Gabirol Isaac the Blind Thierry of Chartres Gemistus Pletho Marsilio Ficino Giovanni Pico della Mirandola Giordano Bruno Cambridge Platonists Thomas Taylor Roman Ingarden Edward N. Zalta Related topics Platonism (in the Renaissance) Platonic Academy Middle Platonism Kabbalah Spirituality Isma'ilism Druze Allegorical interpretations of Plato Plato's unwritten doctrines Neoplatonism and Christianity / Gnosticism  Philosophy portal v t e Anicius Manlius Severinus Boëthius,[a] commonly called Boethius[b] (/boʊˈiːθiəs/; also Boetius /-ʃəs/; c. 477 – 524 AD), was a Roman senator, consul, magister officiorum, and philosopher of the early 6th century. He was born about a year after Odoacer deposed the last Western Roman Emperor and declared himself King of Italy. Boethius entered public service under Ostrogothic King Theodoric the Great, who later imprisoned and executed him in 524 on charges of conspiracy to overthrow him.[4] While jailed, Boethius composed his Consolation of Philosophy, a philosophical treatise on fortune, death, and other issues, which became one of the most popular and influential works of the Middle Ages. As the author of numerous handbooks and translator of Plato and Aristotle, he became the main intermediary between Classical antiquity and following centuries. Contents 1 Early life and rise to power 2 Fall and death 3 Works 3.1 De consolatione philosophiae 3.2 De topicis differentiis 3.3 De arithmetica 3.4 De institutione musica 3.5 Opuscula sacra 4 History of reception 5 Veneration 6 In popular culture 7 See also 8 Notes 9 References 9.1 Works available online 9.2 Bibliography 10 External links 10.1 Works 10.2 On Boethius' life and works 10.3 On Boethius' logic and philosophy Early life and rise to power[edit] Boethius was born in Rome to a patrician family around 480,[5] but his exact birth date is unknown.[3] His family, the Anicii, included emperors Petronius Maximus and Olybrius and many consuls.[3] His grandfather, a senator by the same name, was appointed as Praetorian Prefect of Italy. He died in 454, during the palace plot against magister militum Flavius Aetius.[6] Boethius' father, Manlius Boethius, who was appointed consul in 487, died while Boethius was young. Another patrician, Quintus Aurelius Memmius Symmachus, adopted and raised Boethius, instilling in him a love for literature and philosophy.[7] Both Memmius Symmachus and Boethius were fluent in Greek, an increasingly rare skill at the time in the Western Empire; for this reason, some scholars believe that Boethius was educated in the East. According to John Moorhead, the traditional view is that Boethius studied in Athens, based on Cassiodorus' rhetoric describing Boethius' learning in one of his letters, though this does appear to be a misreading of the text for Boethius' simple facility with the works of Greek philosophers.[8] Pierre Courcelle has argued that Boethius studied at Alexandria with the Neoplatonist philosopher Ammonius Hermiae. However, Moorhead observes that the evidence supporting Boethius having studied in Alexandria "is not as strong as it may appear", and adds that Boethius may have been able to acquire his formidable learning without travelling.[9] On account of his erudition, Boethius entered the service of Theodoric the Great at a young age and was already a senator by the age of 25.[10] His earliest documented acts on behalf of the Ostrogothic ruler were to investigate allegations that the paymaster of Theodoric's bodyguards had debased the coins of their pay; to produce a waterclock for Theodoric to give to king Gundobad of the Burgunds; and to recruit a lyre-player to perform for Clovis, king of the Franks.[11] Boethius married his foster-father's daughter, Rusticiana; their children included two boys, Symmachus and Boethius. During Theodoric's reign, Boethius held many important offices, including the consulship in the year 510, but Boethius confesses in his The Consolation of Philosophy that his greatest achievement was to have both his sons made co-consuls for the same year (522),[12] one representing the east and the other the west, and finding himself sitting "between the two consuls and as if it were a military triumph [letting his] largesse fulfill the wildest expectations of the people packed in their seats around [him]".[13] In 522, the same year his two sons were appointed joint consuls, Boethius accepted the appointment to the position of magister officiorum, the head of all the government and court services.[14] Fall and death[edit] Boethius imprisoned, from a 1385 manuscript of the Consolation. In 520 Boethius was working to revitalize the relationship between the Roman See and the Constantinopolitan See; though still both a part of the same Church, disagreements had begun to emerge between them. This may have set in place a course of events that would lead to loss of royal favour.[14] Five hundred years later, this continuing disagreement led to the East–West Schism in 1054, in which communion between the Catholic Church and Eastern Orthodox Church was broken. In 523 Boethius fell from power. After a period of imprisonment in Pavia for what was deemed a treasonable offence, he was executed in 524.[5][15] The primary sources are in general agreement over the facts of what happened. At a meeting of the Royal Council in Verona, the referendarius Cyprianus accused the ex-consul Caecina Decius Faustus Albinus of treasonous correspondence with Justin I. Boethius leapt to his defense, crying, "The charge of Cyprianus is false, but if Albinus did that, so also have I and the whole senate with one accord done it; it is false, my Lord King."[16] Cyprianus then also accused Boethius of the same crime and produced three men who claimed they had witnessed the crime. Boethius and Basilius were arrested. First the pair were detained in the baptistery of a church, then Boethius was exiled to the Ager Calventianus, a distant country estate, where he was put to death. Not long afterwards Theodoric had Boethius' father-in-law Symmachus put to death, according to Procopius, on the grounds that he and Boethius together were planning a revolution, and confiscated their property.[17] "The basic facts in the case are not in dispute," writes Jeffrey Richards. "What is disputed about this sequence of events is the interpretation that should be put on them."[18] Boethius claims his crime was seeking "the safety of the Senate". He describes the three witnesses against him as dishonorable: Basilius had been dismissed from Royal service for his debts, while Venantius Opilio and Gaudentius had been exiled for fraud.[19] However, other sources depict these men in a far more positive light. For example, Cassiodorus describes Cyprianus and Opilio as "utterly scrupulous, just and loyal" and mentions they are brothers and grandsons of the consul Opilio.[20] Theodoric was feeling threatened by international events. The Acacian Schism had been resolved, and the Nicene Christian aristocrats of his kingdom were seeking to renew their ties with Constantinople. The Catholic Hilderic had become king of the Vandals and had put Theodoric's sister Amalafrida to death,[21] and Arians in the East were being persecuted.[22] Then there was the matter that with his previous ties to Theodahad, Boethius apparently found himself on the wrong side in the succession dispute following the untimely death of Eutharic, Theodoric's announced heir. The method of Boethius' execution varies in the sources. Perhaps he was killed with an axe or a sword, or possibly he was clubbed to death, or possibly hanged.[23] According to another version a rope was attached round his head and tightened till his eyes bulged out; then his skull was cracked. In any case, his remains were entombed in the church of San Pietro in Ciel d'Oro in Pavia, also the resting place of Augustine of Hippo. In Dante's The Divine Comedy, Paradise, Canto X, lines 121–29, the spirit of Boethius is pointed out by Saint Thomas Aquinas: Now if thy mental eye conducted be From light to light, as I resound their frame, The eighth well worth attention thou wilt see. The soul who pointed out the world's dark ways, To all who listen, its deceits unfolding. Beneath in Cieldauro lies the frame Whence it was driven; -from woe and exile, to This fair abode of peace and bliss it came. Past historians have had a hard time accepting a sincere Christian who was also a serious Hellenist.[24] Arnaldo Momigliano argues that "many people have turned to Christianity for consolation. Boethius turned to paganism. His Christianity collapsed—it collapsed so thoroughly that perhaps he did not even notice its disappearance." However, this view does not reflect the majority of current scholarship on the matter.[25] The community that he was part of valued both classical and Christian culture.[26] Works[edit] Narius Manilas Boethius, the father of Anicius Manlius Severinus Boethius. Dates of composition[27] Mathematical works De arithmetica (On Arithmetic, c. 500) adapted translation of the Introductionis Arithmeticae by Nicomachus of Gerasa (c. 160 – c. 220). De musica (On Music, c. 510), based on a lost work by Nicomachus of Gerasa and on Ptolemy's Harmonica. Possibly a treatise on geometry, extant only in fragments.[28] Logical Works A) Translations Porphyry's Isagoge In Categorias Aristotelis: Aristotle's Categories De interpretatione vel periermenias: Aristotle's De Interpretatione Interpretatio priorum Analyticorum (two versions): Aristotle's Prior Analytics Interpretatio Topicorum Aristotelis: Aristotle's Topics Interpretatio Elenchorum Sophisticorum Aristotelis: Aristotle's Sophistical Refutations B) Commentaries In Isagogen Porphyrii commenta (two commentaries, the first based on a translation by Marius Victorinus, (c. 504–05); the second based on Boethius' own translation (507–509). In Categorias Aristotelis (c. 509–11) In librum Aristotelis de interpretatione Commentaria minora (not before 513) In librum Aristotelis de interpretatione Commentaria majora (c. 515–16) In Aristotelis Analytica Priora (c. 520–523) Commentaria in Topica Ciceronis (incomplete: the end the sixth book and the seventh are missing) Original Treatises De divisione (515–520?) De syllogismo cathegorico (505–506) Introductio ad syllogismos cathegoricos (c. 523) De hypotheticis syllogismis (516–522) De topicis differentiis (c. 522–23) Opuscula Sacra (Theological Treatises) De Trinitate (c. 520–21) Utrum Pater et Filius et Spiritus Sanctus de divinitate substantialiter praedicentur (Whether Father and Son and Holy Spirit are Substantially Predicated of the Divinity) Quomodo substantiae in eo quod sint bonae sint cum non sint substantialia bona [also known as De hebdomadibus] (How Substances are Good in that they Exist, when They are not Substantially Good) De fide Catholica Contra Eutychen et Nestorium (Against Eutyches and Nestorius) De consolatione Philosophiae (524–525). De consolatione philosophiae[edit] Lady Philosophy and Boethius from the Consolation, (Ghent, 1485) Boethius's best known work is the Consolation of Philosophy (De consolatione philosophiae), which he wrote most likely while in exile under house arrest or in prison while awaiting his execution.[29] This work represented an imaginary dialogue between himself and philosophy, with philosophy personified as a woman.[29] The book argues that despite the apparent inequality of the world, there is, in Platonic fashion, a higher power and everything else is secondary to that divine Providence.[4] Several manuscripts survived and these were widely edited, translated and printed throughout the late 15th century and later in Europe.[29] Beyond Consolation of Philosophy, his lifelong project was a deliberate attempt to preserve ancient classical knowledge, particularly philosophy. Boethius intended to translate all the works of Aristotle and Plato from the original Greek into Latin.[30][31][32] De topicis differentiis[edit] His completed translations of Aristotle's works on logic were the only significant portions of Aristotle available in Latin Christendom from the sixth century until the 12th century. However, some of his translations (such as his treatment of the topoi in The Topics) were mixed with his own commentary, which reflected both Aristotelian and Platonic concepts.[29] Unfortunately, the commentaries themselves have been lost.[33] In addition to his commentary on the Topics, Boethius composed two treatises on Topical argumentation, In Ciceronis Topica and De topicis differentiis. The first work has six books, and is largely a response to Cicero's Topica.[34] The first book of In Ciceronis Topica begins with a dedication to Patricius. It includes distinctions and assertions important to Boethius's overall philosophy, such as his view of the role of philosophy as "establish[ing] our judgment concerning the governing of life",[35] and definitions of logic from Plato, Aristotle and Cicero. He breaks logic into three parts: that which defines, that which divides, and that which deduces.[35] He asserts that there are three types of arguments: those of necessity, of ready believability, and sophistry.[36] He follows Aristotle in defining one sort of Topic as the maximal proposition, a proposition which is somehow shown to be universal or readily believable.[37] The other sort of Topic, the differentiae, are "Topics that contain and include the maximal propositions"; means of categorizing the Topics which Boethius credits to Cicero.[38] Book II covers two kinds of topics: those from related things and those from extrinsic topics. Book III discusses the relationship among things studied through Topics, Topics themselves, and the nature of definition. Book IV analyzes partition, designation and relationships between things (such as pairing, numbering, genus, and species, etc.). After a review of his terms, Boethius spends Book V discussing Stoic logic and Aristotelian causation. Book VI relates the nature of the Topic to causes. In Topicis Differentiis has four books; Book I discusses the nature of rhetorical and dialectical Topics together, Boethius's overall purpose being "to show what the Topics are, what their differentiae are, and which are suited for what syllogisms."[39] He distinguishes between argument (that which constitutes belief) and argumentation (that which demonstrates belief). Propositions are divided into three parts: those that are universal, those that are particular, and those that are somewhere in between.[40] These distinctions, and others, are applicable to both types of Topical argument, rhetorical and dialectical. Books II and III are primarily focused on Topics of dialectic (syllogisms), while Book IV concentrates on the unit of the rhetorical Topic, the enthymeme. Topical argumentation is at the core of Boethius's conception of dialectic, which "have categorical rather than conditional conclusions, and he conceives of the discovery of an argument as the discovery of a middle term capable of linking the two terms of the desired conclusion."[41] Not only are these texts of paramount importance to the study of Boethius, they are also crucial to the history of topical lore. It is largely due to Boethius that the Topics of Aristotle and Cicero were revived, and the Boethian tradition of topical argumentation spans its influence throughout the Middle Ages and into the early Renaissance: "In the works of Ockham, Buridan, Albert of Saxony, and the Pseudo-Scotus, for instance, many of the rules of consequence bear a strong resemblance to or are simply identical with certain Boethian Topics ... Boethius's influence, direct and indirect, on this tradition is enormous."[42] It was also in De Topicis Differentiis that Boethius made a unique contribution to the discourse on dialectic and rhetoric. Topical argumentation for Boethius is dependent upon a new category for the topics discussed by Aristotle and Cicero, and "[u]nlike Aristotle, Boethius recognizes two different types of Topics. First, he says, a Topic is a maximal proposition (maxima propositio), or principle; but there is a second kind of Topic, which he calls the differentia of a maximal proposition ..."[43] Maximal propositions are "propositions [that are] known per se, and no proof can be found for these."[44] This is the basis for the idea that demonstration (or the construction of arguments) is dependent ultimately upon ideas or proofs that are known so well and are so fundamental to human understanding of logic that no other proofs come before it. They must hold true in and of themselves. According to Stump, "the role of maximal propositions in argumentation is to ensure the truth of a conclusion by ensuring the truth of its premises either directly or indirectly."[45] These propositions would be used in constructing arguments through the Differentia, which is the second part of Boethius' theory. This is "the genus of the intermediate in the argument."[46] So maximal propositions allow room for an argument to be founded in some sense of logic while differentia are critical for the demonstration and construction of arguments. Boethius' definition of "differentiae" is that they are "the Topics of arguments ... The Topics which are the Differentiae of [maximal] propositions are more universal than those propositions, just as rationality is more universal than man."[47] This is the second part of Boethius' unique contribution to the field of rhetoric. Differentia operate under maximal propositions to "be of use in finding maximal propositions as well as intermediate terms," or the premises that follow maximal propositions.[48] Though Boethius is drawing from Aristotle's Topics, Differentiae are not the same as Topics in some ways. Boethius arranges differentiae through statements, instead of generalized groups as Aristotle does. Stump articulates the difference. They are "expressed as words or phrases whose expansion into appropriate propositions is neither intended nor readily conceivable", unlike Aristotle's clearly defined four groups of Topics. Aristotle had hundreds of topics organized into those four groups, whereas Boethius has twenty-eight "Topics" that are "highly ordered among themselves."[49] This distinction is necessary to understand Boethius as separate from past rhetorical theories. Maximal propositions and Differentiae belong not only to rhetoric, but also to dialectic. Boethius defines dialectic through an analysis of "thesis" and hypothetical propositions. He claims that "[t]here are two kinds of questions. One is that called, 'thesis' by the [Greek] dialecticians. This is the kind of question which asks about and discusses things stripped of relation to other circumstances; it is the sort of question dialecticians most frequently dispute about—for example, 'Is pleasure the greatest good?' [or] 'Should one marry?'."[50] Dialectic has "dialectical topics" as well as "dialectical-rhetorical topics", all of which are still discussed in De Topicis Differentiis.[43] Dialectic, especially in Book I, comprises a major component of Boethius' discussion on Topics. Boethius planned to completely translate Plato's Dialogues, but there is no known surviving translation, if it was actually ever begun.[51] De arithmetica[edit] Boethius chose to pass on the great Greco-Roman culture to future generations by writing manuals on music, astronomy, geometry and arithmetic.[10] Several of Boethius' writings, which were hugely influential during the Middle Ages, drew on the thinking of Porphyry and Iamblichus.[52] Boethius wrote a commentary on the Isagoge by Porphyry,[53] which highlighted the existence of the problem of universals: whether these concepts are subsistent entities which would exist whether anyone thought of them, or whether they only exist as ideas. This topic concerning the ontological nature of universal ideas was one of the most vocal controversies in medieval philosophy. Besides these advanced philosophical works, Boethius is also reported to have translated important Greek texts on the topics of the quadrivium [51] His loose translation of Nicomachus's treatise on arithmetic (De institutione arithmetica libri duo) and his textbook on music (De institutione musica libri quinque, unfinished) contributed to medieval education.[53] De arithmetica begins with modular arithmetic, such as even and odd, evenly even, evenly odd, and oddly even. He then turns to unpredicted complexity by categorizing numbers and parts of numbers.[54] His translations of Euclid on geometry and Ptolemy on astronomy,[55] if they were completed, no longer survive. Boethius made Latin translations of Aristotle's De interpretatione and Categories with commentaries.[14] In his article The Ancient Classics in the Mediaeval Libraries, James Stuart Beddie cites Boethius as the reason Aristotle's works were popular in the Middle Ages, as Boethius preserved many of the philosopher's works.[56] De institutione musica[edit] Boethius' De institutione musica was one of the first musical works to be printed in Venice between the years of 1491 and 1492. It was written toward the beginning of the sixth century and helped medieval authors during the ninth century understand Greek music.[57] Like his Greek predecessors, Boethius believed that arithmetic and music were intertwined, and helped to mutually reinforce the understanding of each, and together exemplified the fundamental principles of order and harmony in the understanding of the universe as it was known during his time.[58] In "De Musica", Boethius introduced the threefold classification of music:[59] Musica mundana – music of the spheres/world; this "music" was not actually audible and was to be understood rather than heard Musica humana – harmony of human body and spiritual harmony Musica instrumentalis – instrumental music Boethius, Arithmetica Geometrica Musica (1492 first printed edition, from Hans Adler Collection) In De musica I.2, Boethius describes 'musica instrumentis' as music produced by something under tension (e.g., strings), by wind (e.g., aulos), by water, or by percussion (e.g., cymbals). Boethius himself doesn't use the term 'instrumentalis', which was used by Adalbold II of Utrecht (975–1026) in his Epistola cum tractatu.[full citation needed] The term is much more common in the 13th century and later.[citation needed] It is also in these later texts that musica instrumentalis is firmly associated with audible music in general, including vocal music. Scholars have traditionally assumed that Boethius also made this connection, possibly under the header of wind instruments ("administratur ... aut spiritu ut tibiis"[c] [60]), but Boethius himself never writes about "instrumentalis" as separate from "instrumentis" explicitly in his very brief description. In one of his works within De institutione musica, Boethius said that "music is so naturally united with us that we cannot be free from it even if we so desired."[61] During the Middle Ages, Boethius was connected to several texts that were used to teach liberal arts. Although he did not address the subject of trivium, he did write many treatises explaining the principles of rhetoric, grammar, and logic. During the Middle Ages, his works of these disciplines were commonly used when studying the three elementary arts.[55] The historian R. W. Southern called Boethius "the schoolmaster of medieval Europe."[62] An 1872 German translation of "De Musica" was the magnum opus of Oscar Paul.[63] Opuscula sacra[edit] Boethius also wrote Christian theological treatises, which supported Catholicism and condemned Arianism and other heterodox forms of Christianity.[64] Five theological works are known:[65] De Trinitate – "The Trinity", where he defends the Council of Chalcedon Trinitarian position, that God is in three persons who have no differences in nature. He argues against the Arian view of the nature of God, which put him at odds with the faith of the Arian King of Italy. Utrum Pater et filius et Spiritus Sanctus de divinitate substantialiter praedicentur – "Whether Father, Son and Holy Spirit are Substantially Predicated of the Divinity," a short work where he uses reason and Aristotelian epistemology to argue that the Catholic views of the nature of God are correct.[66] Quomodo substantiae De fide catholica – "On the Catholic Faith" Contra Eutychen et Nestorium – "Against Eutyches and Nestorius," from around 513, which dates it as the earliest of his theological works. Eutyches and Nestorius were contemporaries from the early to mid-5th century who held divergent Christological theologies. Boethius argues for a middle ground in conformity with Roman Catholic faith. His theological works played an important part during the Middle Ages in philosophical thought, including the fields of logic, ontology, and metaphysics.[67] History of reception[edit] Part of a series on Scholasticism Scholastic schools Thomism Scotism Occamism Major scholastic works Summa Theologica Cur Deus Homo Summa Grammatica Summa logicae Opus Oxoniense Libri Quattuor Sententiarum Precursors Augustine of Hippo Boethius Pope Gregory I Alcuin of York John Scotus Eriugena People Thomas Aquinas ("Doctor Angelicus") Duns Scotus ("Doctor Subtilis") William of Ockham ("Doctor Invincibilis") Francisco Suárez ("Doctor Eximius") Averroes ("The Commentator") Albertus Magnus ("Doctor Universalis") Peter Lombard ("The Master") Bonaventure ("Doctor Seraphicus") Anselm of Canterbury ("Doctor Marianus") Peter Abelard ("Doctor Scholasticus") Related Philosophy Aristotelianism Dominican Order Franciscan Order Catholic theology Islamic philosophy Empiricism Neoplatonism Neo-Thomism Problem of universals  Philosophy portal  Catholicism portal v t e Lorenzo Valla described Boethius as the last of the Romans and the first of the scholastic philosophers.[12] Despite the use of his mathematical texts in the early universities, it is his final work, the Consolation of Philosophy, that assured his legacy in the Middle Ages and beyond. This work is cast as a dialogue between Boethius himself, at first bitter and despairing over his imprisonment, and the spirit of philosophy, depicted as a woman of wisdom and compassion. "Alternately composed in prose and verse,[52] the Consolation teaches acceptance of hardship in a spirit of philosophical detachment from misfortune".[68] Parts of the work are reminiscent of the Socratic method of Plato's dialogues, as the spirit of philosophy questions Boethius and challenges his emotional reactions to adversity. The work was translated into Old English by King Alfred, although Alfred's authorship of this Old English translation has recently been questioned,[citation needed] and into later English by Chaucer and Queen Elizabeth.[64] Many manuscripts survive and it was extensively edited, translated and printed throughout Europe from the 14th century onwards.[69] Many commentaries on it were compiled, and it has been one of the most influential books in European culture. No complete bibliography has ever been assembled, but it would run into thousands of items.[68][failed verification] "The Boethian Wheel" is a model for Boethius' belief that history is a wheel,[70] a metaphor that Boethius uses frequently in the Consolation; it remained very popular throughout the Middle Ages, and is still often seen today. As the wheel turns, those who have power and wealth will turn to dust; men may rise from poverty and hunger to greatness, while those who are great may fall with the turn of the wheel. It was represented in the Middle Ages in many relics of art depicting the rise and fall of man. Descriptions of "The Boethian Wheel" can be found in the literature of the Middle Ages from the Romance of the Rose to Chaucer.[71] De topicis differentiis was the basis for one of the first works of logic in a western European vernacular, a selection of excerpts translated into Old French by John of Antioch in 1282.[72] Veneration[edit] The Tomb of Boethius in San Pietro in Ciel d'Oro, Pavia. Boethius is recognized as a martyr for the Catholic faith by the Roman Martyrology, though to Watkins "his status as martyr is dubious".[73] His cult is held in Pavia, where Boethius's status as a saint was confirmed in 1883, and in the Church of Santa Maria in Portico in Rome. His feast day is 23 October.[74][73][75] In the current Martyrologium Romanum, his feast is still restricted to that diocese.[76] Pope Benedict XVI explained the relevance of Boethius to modern day Christians by linking his teachings to an understanding of Providence.[10] He is also venerated in the Eastern Orthodox Church.[77] In popular culture[edit] In the novel A Confederacy of Dunces by John Kennedy Toole, Boethius is the favorite philosopher of main character Ignatius J. Reilly. "The Boethian Wheel" is a theme throughout the book, which won the Pulitzer Prize for Fiction in 1981.[78] Peter Glassgold translated Boethius's poems on the consolation of philosophy "out of the original Latin into a diverse historical Englishings diligently collaged," (Sun and Moon Press, 1994).[79] C.S. Lewis references Boethius in chapter 27 of the Screwtape Letters. [80] Boethius also appears in the 2002 film "24 Hour Party People" where he is played by Christopher Eccleston. As Tony Wilson passes by, Boethius (disguised as a beggar) says, "It's my belief that history is a wheel. "Inconstancy is my very essence" -says the wheel- "Rise up on my spokes if you like, but don't complain when you are cast back down into the depths. Good times pass away, but then so do the bad. Mutability is our tragedy, but it is also our hope. The worst of times, like the best, are always passing away." See also[edit] De Fide Catolica Notes[edit] ^ The name Anicius demonstrated his connection with a noble family of the Lower Empire, while Manlius claims lineage from the Manlii Torquati of the Republic. The name Severinus was given to him in honour of Severinus of Noricum.[3] ^ In English, the o and e in Boethius are pronounced separately: /boʊˈiːθiəs/. It is hence traditionally written with a diæresis, viz. "Boëthius", a spelling which has been disappearing due to the limitations of typewriters. ^ "Haec vero administratur aut intentione ut nervis, aut spiritu ut tibiis, vel his, quae ad aquam moventur, aut percussione quadam, ut in his, quae in concava quaedam aerea feriuntur, atque inde diversi efficiuntur soni." Translated: "This, however, is operated by the motion of a string, or the wind of a pipe, or to those, which are moved by the water, or the beat of time, as in the following, which is striking a kind of brass hollow, and in the other are made of a corresponding sound." References[edit] ^ Anicius Manlius Severinus Boethius Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy ^ A.D. Smith, Anselm's Other Argument, Harvard University Press, 2014, p. 66. ^ a b c Hodgkin, Thomas (2001), Italy and Her Invaders, London: Adamant Media Corporation. ^ a b "Boethius", The Online Library of Liberty, retrieved 23 October 2017 . ^ a b Noel Harold Kaylor; Philip Edward Phillips (2012), A Companion to Boethius in the Middle Ages, Brill, pp. 1–, ISBN 978-90-04-18354-4, retrieved 19 January 2013 ^ Heather, P. J. (Peter J.) (2006). The fall of the Roman Empire : a new history of Rome and the Barbarians. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 244–245. ISBN 9780199978618. OCLC 806039879. ^ Boethius (1969), De consolatione philosophiae, translated by Watts, V.E., Harmonsworth: Penguin, 2.3, p. 59 . ^ Noel Harold Kaylor; Philip Edward Phillips (2012), A Companion to Boethius in the Middle Ages, Brill, pp. 4–, ISBN 978-90-04-18354-4, retrieved 19 January 2013 ^ Moorhead (2009), "Boethius' life and the world of late antique philosophy", in Marenbon, John (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Boethius, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 29 . ^ a b c Pope Benedict XVI (12 March 2008), Boethius and Cassiodorus, archived from the original on 28 December 2008, retrieved 4 November 2009 . ^ Cassiodorus (1992), Variae, translated by Barnish, S.J.B., Liverpool: University Press, I.10, pp. 12–14; I.45, 20–23; II.40, 38–43 . ^ a b Boethius, Anicius Manlius Severinus. The Theological Tractates and The Consolation of Philosophy. Translated by H. F. Steward and E. K. Rand. Cambridge: The Project Gutenberg, 2004. ^ De consolatione philosophiae, 2.3; translated by Watts, p. 60 ^ a b c "Anicius Manlius Severinus Boethius", MacTutor History of Mathematicas archive, U of St Andrews, 2000, retrieved 4 November 2009 . ^ Boethius (2007), The Theological Tractates and The Consolation of Philosophy, Digireads.com, pp. 5–, ISBN 978-1-4209-2975-1, retrieved 22 January 2013 ^ Anonymous Valesianus, 14.85; text and English translation of this document is in J. C. Rolfe (trans.), Ammianus Marcellinus (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1972), vol. 3 pp. 562ff ^ History of the Wars, 5.1.34. Text and translation in H. B. Dewing, Procopius (London: Heinemann, 1968), vol. 3 p. 12f ^ Richards, The Popes and the Papacy in the Early Middle Ages (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1979), p. 114 ^ De consolatione I.4.3; translated by V. E. Watts, Boethius: The consolation of philosophy (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1969), p. 42 ^ Cassiodorus, Variae, V.40, 41 ^ Bury, J. B., History of the Later Roman Empire, p.158, Macmillan & Co., Ltd. 1923 ^ Richards, Popes and the Papacy, p. 119 ^ Fried, Johannes (2015). The Middle Ages (third ed.). Cambridge, MA and London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. p. 1. ISBN 978-0-674-05562-9. ^ Lindberg, David C. (1980), Science in the Middle Ages, University of Chicago Press, pp. 10–, ISBN 978-0-226-48233-0, retrieved 12 January 2013 ^ Walsh, P.G. (2000), "Introduction", The Consolation of Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford U. Press, p. xxvii . ^ Noel Harold Kaylor; Philip Edward Phillips (2012), A Companion to Boethius in the Middle Ages, Brill, pp. 14–, ISBN 978-90-04-18354-4, retrieved 19 January 2013 ^ Phillips, Philip Edward (2012), "Anicius Manlius Severinus Boethius: A Chronology and Selected Annotated Bibliography", in Noel Harold Kaylor Jr.; Philip Edward Phillips (eds.), A Companion to Boethius in the Middle Ages, Leiden: Brill, pp. 551–589 . ^ Folkerts, Menso, ed. (1970), Boethius' Geometrie II. Ein mathematisches Lehrbuch des Mittelalters, Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner ^ a b c d Boethius, Anicius Manlius Severinus. Consolation of Philosophy. Translated by Joel Relihan. Norton: Hackett Publishing Company, 2001. ^ Spade, Paul Vincent (15 March 2016), "Medieval Philosophy", Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, retrieved 23 October 2017 ^ Thomas Aquinas; Frederick Christian Bauerschmidt (2005), Holy Teaching: Introducing the Summa Theologiae of St. Thomas Aquinas, Brazos Press, pp. 14–, ISBN 978-1-58743-035-0, retrieved 22 March 2013 ^ Rubenstein, Richard E. (2004). Aristotle's Children. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. pp. 62–. ISBN 978-0-547-35097-4. Retrieved 22 March 2013. ^ Stump, Eleonore (1988), Introduction, In Ciceronis Topica, by Boethius, Cornell University Press, p. 3, ISBN 978-0801489341 ^ Stump, Eleanor (1988), Introduction, In Ciceronis Topica, by Boethius, Cornell University Press, p. 22, ISBN 978-0801489334 ^ a b Boethius (1988), In Ciceronis Topica, translated by Stump, Eleonore, Cornell University, p. 25 ^ Stump, Eleanor (1988), Introduction, In Ciceronis Topica, by Boethius, Cornell University Press, p. 26, ISBN 978-0801489341 ^ Boethius. In Ciceronis Topica. 34 ^ Boethius. In Ciceronis Topica. 35 ^ Boethius (1978), De topicis differentiis, translated by Stump, Eleonore, Cornell University Press, p. 29, ISBN 978-0801489334 ^ Boethius (1978), De topicis differentiis, translated by Stump, Eleonore, Cornell University Press, p. 31, ISBN 978-0801489334 ^ Stump, Eleonore (1978), Introduction, De topicis differentiis, by Boethius, Cornell University Press, p. 6, ISBN 9780801489334 ^ Stump, Eleonore (1978), Introduction, De topicis differentiis, by Boethius, Cornell University Press, pp. 7, 9–8, ISBN 978-0801489334 . ^ a b Stump, Eleonore (1978), "Dialectic and Boethius's De topicis differentiis", De topicis differentiis, by Boethius, Cornell University Press, p. 180, ISBN 978-0801489334 . ^ Boethius (1978), De topicis differentiis, translated by Stump, Eleonore, Cornell University Press, p. 33, ISBN 978-0801489334 ^ Stump, Eleonore (1978), "Dialectic and Boethius's De topicis differentiis", De topicis differentiis, by Boethius, Cornell University Press, p. 181, ISBN 978-0801489334 ^ Stump, Eleonore (1978), "Dialectic and Boethius's De topicis differentiis", De topicis differentiis, by Boethius, Cornell University Press, p. 198, ISBN 978-0801489334 ^ Boethius (1978), De topicis differentiis, translated by Stump, Eleonore, Cornell University Press, p. 48, ISBN 978-0801489334 ^ Stump, Eleonore (1978), "Dialectic and Boethius's De topicis differentiis", De topicis differentiis, by Boethius, Cornell University Press, p. 204, ISBN 978-0801489334 . ^ Stump, Eleonore (1978), "Dialectic and Boethius's De topicis differentiis", De topicis differentiis, by Boethius, Cornell University Press, p. 205, ISBN 978-0801489334 ^ Boethius (1978), De topicis differentiis, translated by Stump, Eleonore, Cornell University Press, p. 35, ISBN 978-0801489334 ^ a b Cassiodorus (1992), Variae, translated by Barnish, S.J.B., Liverpool: University Press, I.45.4 . ^ a b Marenbon, John (2016), "Anicius Manlius Severinus Boethius", Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, retrieved 23 October 2017 ^ a b Herbermann, Charles, ed. (1913). "Anicius Manlius Severinus Boethius" . Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. . ^ Schrader, Dorothy V (1968), "De Arithmetica, Book I, of Boethius", Mathematics Teacher, 61: 615–28 . ^ a b Masi, Michael (1979), "The Liberal Arts and Gerardus Ruffus' Commentary on the Boethian De Arithmetica", The Sixteenth Century Journal, 10 (2): 24, doi:10.2307/2539405, JSTOR 2539405 . ^ Beddie, James Stuart (1930), "The Ancient Classics in the Mediaeval Libraries", Speculum, 5 (1): 3–20, doi:10.2307/2846353, JSTOR 2846353, S2CID 163314872 , p. 3 ^ Boethius, Anicius Manlius Severinus (1989), Palisca, Claude V. (ed.), Fundamentals of Music, translated by Bower, Calvin M., New Haven: Yale University Press, ISBN 978-0300039436 . ^ Grout, Donald (1980). A History of Western Music (3rd ed.). New York: W.W. Norton & Company. p. 24. ISBN 978-0393951363. ^ Bower, Calvin M. (2006), "The transmission of ancient music theory into the Middle Ages", in Christensen, Thomas (ed.), The Cambridge History of Western Music Theory, Cambridge University Press, pp. 136–167, ISBN 978-0521686983 , p. 146. ^ Boethius 1867, p. 189. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFBoethius1867 (help) ^ Boethius, Anicius Manlius Severinus (1989), Palisca, Claude V. (ed.), Fundamentals of Music, translated by Bower, Calvin M., New Haven: Yale University Press, p. 8, ISBN 978-0300039436 . ^ Herman, Arthur (2013). The Cave and the Light. Random House. ISBN 978-0553807301. ^ Paul, Oscar (1872), Boetius und die griechische Harmonik (in German), Leipzig: F.E.C. Leuckart . ^ a b Cooper, W.V. (1902), "Editorial Note", Consolation of Philosophy, by Boethius, Anicius Manlius Severinus, translated by W.V. Cooper, London: J.M. Dent and Company . ^ Noel Harold Kaylor; Philip Edward Phillips (2012), A Companion to Boethius in the Middle Ages, Brill, pp. 15–, ISBN 978-90-04-18354-4, retrieved 19 January 2013 ^ Speer, Andreas (2011), "The Division of Metaphysical Discourses: Boethius, Thomas Aquinas, and Meister Eckhart", in Emery, Kent; Friedman, Russell; Speer, Andreas (eds.), Philosophy and Theology in the Long Middle Ages: A Tribute to Stephen F. Brown, Leiden: Brill, pp. 91–116, ISBN 978-90-04-16942-5 , p. 95 ^ Bradshaw, David (2009), "The Opuscula sacra: Boethius and theology", in Marenbon, John (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Boethius, pp. 105–128, doi:10.1017/CCOL9780521872669.006, ISBN 978-1139002493 ^ a b James, H.R. (2007), Preface, Consolation of Philosophy, by Boethius, translated by H.R. James, Adelaide: The University of Adelaide . ^ Dwyer, Richard A. (1976), Boethian Fictions: Narratives in the Medieval French Versions of the Consolatio Philosophiae, Medieval Academy of America . ^ Boethius (1999), Consolation of Philosophy, translated by Watts, Victor (Rev ed.), Penguin, p. 24, n. 1 . ^ Carroll-Clark, Susan (1994), "The Wheel of Fortune", The Middle Ages.net . ^ Jonathan Rubin (2018), "John of Antioch and the Perceptions of Language and Translation in Thirteenth-Century Acre", in John France (ed.), Acre and Its Falls: Studies in the History of a Crusader City, Brill , p. 93. ^ a b Watkins, Basil (2016). The Book of Saints. St. Augustine's Abbey of Ramsgate, England (8th ed.). London: Bloomsbury. p. 108. ISBN 978-0567664150. OCLC 908373623. ^ Farmer, David Hugh (2011). The Oxford Dictionary of Saints (5th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 53. ISBN 978-0199596607. OCLC 726871260. ^ Martirologio (in Italian), translated by Stefano Calvi, archived from the original on 7 December 2010 . ^ Martyrologium Romanum (2nd ed.). Rome: Libreria Editrice Vaticana. 2004. p. 586. ISBN 978-8820972103. ^ Latin Saints of the Orthodox Patriarchate of Rome ^ Miller, Karl (1999-03-05). "An American tragedy. A lifetime of rejection broke John Kennedy Toole. But his aged mother believed in his talent, found a publisher for his novel and rescued his memory from oblivion". www.newstatesman.com. Retrieved 2018-06-09. ^ Glassgold, Peter. "Beothius: The Poems from on the Consolation of Philosophy Translated out of the original Latin into diverse historical Englishings diligently collaged". Amazon. Retrieved 28 April 2019. ^ Lewis, Clive (1942). The Screwtape Letters. Faded Page. p. 57. Retrieved 28 April 2019. Works available online[edit] Dialectica, 1547 James, H.R. (translator) [1897] (2007), The Consolation of Philosophy of Boethius, The University of Adelaide: eBooks @ Adelaide, archived from the original on 2007-04-27 . Boethius, Anicius Manlius Severinus (1867). "De institutione arithmetica libri duo". In Gottfried Friedlein (ed.). Anicii Manlii Torquati Severini Boetii De institutione arithmetica libri duo: De institutione musica libri quinque. Accedit geometria quae fertur Boetii (in Latin). in aedibus B.G. Teubneri. pp. 1–173. Retrieved 2008-08-03. Boethius, Anicius Manlius Severinus (1867). "De institutione musica libri quinque". In Gottfried Friedlein (ed.). Anicii Manlii Torquati Severini Boetii De institutione arithmetica libri duo: De institutione musica libri quinque. Accedit geometria quae fertur Boetii (in Latin). in aedibus B.G. Teubneri. pp. 177–371. Retrieved 2015-10-08. Bibliography[edit] Attwater, Donald; Catherine Rachel John (1995), The Penguin Dictionary of Saints, London: Penguin Books, ISBN 978-0-14-051312-7, OCLC 34361179 . Baird, Forrest E.; Walter Kaufmann (2008), From Plato to Derrida, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall, ISBN 978-0-13-158591-1 . Boethius, Anicius Manlius Severinus (1926), trans., H.F. Stewart, E.K. Rand, and "I.T.". The Theological Tractates and The Consolation of Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard, Loeb Classical Library, parallel text. Chadwick, Henry (1981), Boethius, the Consolations of Music, Logic, Theology, and Philosophy, Oxford: Clarendon Press, ISBN 978-0-19-826549-8, OCLC 8533668 . Colish, Marcia L. (2002), Medieval Foundations of the Western Intellectual Tradition, 400–1400, New Haven: Yale University Press, ISBN 978-0-300-07852-7, OCLC 185694056 . Magee, John (1989), Boethius on Signification and Mind, Leiden: Brill, ISBN 978-90-04-09096-5 . Marenbon, John (2004), Boethius, Oxford: Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-513407-0, OCLC 186379876 . Marenbon, John (2009), The Cambridge Companion to Boethius, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-87266-9 . Papahagi, Adrian (2010). Boethiana Mediaevalia – A Collection of Studies on the Early Medieval Fortune of Boethius' Consolation of Philosophy. Bucharest: Zeta Books. ISBN 978-973-1997-79-7. Suto, Taki (2011), Boethius on Mind, Grammar and Logic. A Study of Boethius' Commentaries on Peri Hermeneias, Cambridge: Brill, ISBN 978-90-04-21418-7 . Westfall, Joseph (2008), "Boethius: Kierkegaard and The Consolation", in Stewart, Jon (ed.), Kierkegaard and the Patristic and Medieval Traditions, Ashgate, pp. 207–222, ISBN 978-0-7546-6391-1 . Library resources about Boethius Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries By Boethius Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries External links[edit] Works[edit] Wikisource has original works written by or about: Boethius Wikiquote has quotations related to: Boethius Wikimedia Commons has media related to Anicius Manlius Torquatus Severinus Boethius. Latin Wikisource has original text related to this article: Anicius Manlius Torquatus Severinus Boethius Works by Boethius at Project Gutenberg Works by or about Boethius at Internet Archive Works by Boethius at LibriVox (public domain audiobooks) {en} De Trinitate (On the Holy Trinity) – Boethius, Erik Kenyon (trans.) {en} Theological Tractates; Christian Classics Ethereal Library A 10th-century manuscript of Institutio Arithmetica is available online from Lund University, Sweden The Geoffrey Freudlin 1885 edition of the Arithmetica, from the Cornell Library Historical Mathematics Monographs Online Galleries, History of Science Collections, University of Oklahoma Libraries High resolution images of works by Boethius in .jpg and .tiff format. Codices Boethiani: A Conspectus of Manuscripts of the Work of Boethius Works by Boethius at Perseus Digital Library MS 1083/30 Regiment of princes; Consolation of philosophy at OPenn MS 484/15 Commentum super libro Porphyrii Isagoge; De decim predicamentis at OPenn On Boethius' life and works[edit] Blessed Severinus Boethius at Patron Saints Index Blackwood, Stephen. The Meters of Boethius: Rhythmic Therapy in the Consolation of Philosophy. Blackwood, Stephen (2015). The Consolation of Boethius as Poetic Liturgy. Oxford Early Christian Studies. Oxford University Press. p. 398. ISBN 978-0-19-871831-4. O'Connor, John J.; Robertson, Edmund F., "Boethius", MacTutor History of Mathematics archive, University of St Andrews . Phillips, Philip Edward. Boethius: A Selected Bibliography for Students Boethius at The Online Library of Liberty On Boethius and Cassiodorus – Pope Benedict XVI On Boethius' logic and philosophy[edit] Marenbon, John. "Anicius Manlius Severinus Boethius". In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The Philosophical Works of Boethius. Editions and Translations Boethius' Logic and Metaphysics. An Annotated Bibliography Preceded by Flavius Inportunus (alone) Consul of the Roman Empire 510 Succeeded by Arcadius Placidus Magnus Felix, Flavius Secundinus v t e Ancient Greek and Hellenistic mathematics (Euclidean geometry) Mathematicians (timeline) Anaxagoras Anthemius Archytas Aristaeus the Elder Aristarchus Apollonius Archimedes Autolycus Bion Bryson Callippus Carpus Chrysippus Cleomedes Conon Ctesibius Democritus Dicaearchus Diocles Diophantus Dinostratus Dionysodorus Domninus Eratosthenes Eudemus Euclid Eudoxus Eutocius Geminus Heron Hipparchus Hippasus Hippias Hippocrates Hypatia Hypsicles Isidore of Miletus Leon Marinus Menaechmus Menelaus Metrodorus Nicomachus Nicomedes Nicoteles Oenopides Pappus Perseus Philolaus Philon Philonides Porphyry Posidonius Proclus Ptolemy Pythagoras Serenus Simplicius Sosigenes Sporus Thales Theaetetus Theano Theodorus Theodosius Theon of Alexandria Theon of Smyrna Thymaridas Xenocrates Zeno of Elea Zeno of Sidon Zenodorus Treatises Almagest Archimedes Palimpsest Arithmetica Conics (Apollonius) Catoptrics Data (Euclid) Elements (Euclid) Measurement of a Circle On Conoids and Spheroids On the Sizes and Distances (Aristarchus) On Sizes and Distances (Hipparchus) On the Moving Sphere (Autolycus) Euclid's Optics On Spirals On the Sphere and Cylinder Ostomachion Planisphaerium Sphaerics The Quadrature of the Parabola The Sand Reckoner Problems Angle trisection Doubling the cube Squaring the circle Problem of Apollonius Concepts/definitions Circles of Apollonius Apollonian circles Apollonian gasket Circumscribed circle Commensurability Diophantine equation Doctrine of proportionality Golden ratio Greek numerals Incircle and excircles of a triangle Method of exhaustion Parallel postulate Platonic solid Lune of Hippocrates Quadratrix of Hippias Regular polygon Straightedge and compass construction Triangle center Results In Elements Angle bisector theorem Exterior angle theorem Euclidean algorithm Euclid's theorem Geometric mean theorem Greek geometric algebra Hinge theorem Inscribed angle theorem Intercept theorem Pons asinorum Pythagorean theorem Thales's theorem Theorem of the gnomon Apollonius Apollonius's theorem Other Aristarchus's inequality Crossbar theorem Heron's formula Irrational numbers Menelaus's theorem Pappus's area theorem Ptolemy's inequality Ptolemy's table of chords Ptolemy's theorem Spiral of Theodorus Centers Cyrene Library of Alexandria Platonic Academy Other Ancient Greek astronomy Greek numerals Latin translations of the 12th century Neusis construction v t e Platonists Academic Old Plato Aristotle Eudoxus Philip of Opus Aristonymus Coriscus and Erastus of Scepsis Demetrius of Amphipolis Euaeon of Lampsacus Heraclides and Python of Aenus Hestiaeus of Perinthus Lastheneia of Mantinea Timolaus of Cyzicus Speusippus Axiothea of Phlius Heraclides Ponticus Menedemus of Pyrrha Xenocrates Crantor Polemon Crates of Athens Skeptic Middle Arcesilaus Diocles of Cnidus Lacydes Telecles and Evander Hegesinus New Carneades Hagnon of Tarsus Metrodorus of Stratonicea Clitomachus Charmadas Aeschines of Neapolis Philo of Larissa Cicero Dio of Alexandria Middle Platonist Antiochus Philo of Alexandria Plutarch Justin Martyr Gaius Albinus Alcinous Apuleius Atticus Maximus of Tyre Numenius of Apamea Longinus Clement of Alexandria Origen the Pagan Calcidius Neoplatonist Ancient Ammonius Saccas Plotinus Disciples Origen Amelius Porphyry Iamblichus Sopater Eustathius of Cappadocia Sosipatra Aedesius Dexippus Chrysanthius Theodorus of Asine Julian Sallustius Maximus of Ephesus Eusebius of Myndus Priscus of Epirus Antoninus Gregory of Nyssa Hypatia Augustine Macrobius Academy Plutarch of Athens Asclepigenia Hierocles Syrianus Hermias Aedesia Proclus Ammonius Hermiae Asclepiodotus Hegias Zenodotus Marinus Agapius Isidore Damascius Simplicius Priscian Medieval Boethius John Philoponus Olympiodorus Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite John Scotus Eriugena Islamic Golden Age Al-Farabi Anselm Peter Abelard Chartres Bernard Gilbert Thierry Henry of Ghent Bonaventure Theodoric of Freiberg Meister Eckhart Berthold of Moosburg Paul of Venice Modern Renaissance Florentine Academy Plethon Marsilio Ficino Cristoforo Landino Giovanni Pico della Mirandola Cambridge Ralph Cudworth Henry More Anne Conway Petrus Ramus Giordano Bruno Blaise Pascal Emanuel Swedenborg German idealist Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Christian Wolff Moses Mendelssohn Immanuel Kant Johann Gottlieb Fichte Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling Arthur Schopenhauer G. W. F. Hegel Hermann Lotze Otto Weininger Thomas Taylor Ralph Waldo Emerson Josiah Royce Søren Kierkegaard Henri Bergson Aleksei Losev Contemporary Analytic Gottlob Frege G. E. Moore Kurt Gödel Alonzo Church Roderick Chisholm Michael Dummett W. V. O. Quine David Kaplan Saul Kripke Alvin Plantinga Peter van Inwagen Nicholas Wolterstorff Crispin Wright Edward N. Zalta Continental Edmund Husserl Roman Ingarden Leo Strauss Miscellaneous Philip K. Dick Joseph Ratzinger Bernard Bolzano v t e Medieval philosophers Islamic Early Al-Jahiz Alkindus Ibn al-Rawandi Al-Razi (Rhazes) Al-Farabi (Alpharabius) Ibn Masarra Al Amiri Ebn Meskavayh Ibn al-Haytham (Alhazen) Abu Rayhan Biruni "Brethren of Purity" High Ibn Sīnā (Avicenna) Ibn Hazm Al-Ghazali (Algazel) Abu'l-Barakāt al-Baghdādī Ibn Bajjah (Avempace) Ayn al-Quzat Hamadani Ibn Tufail Ibn Rushd (Averroes) Late Ibn Sab'in Shahab al-Din Suhrawardi Fakhr ad-Din ar-Razi Rashid al-Din Ibn Arabi Zachariah Kazwin Abd-el-latif Athīr al-Dīn al-Abharī Nasir al-Din al-Tusi Ibn al-Nafis Qutb al-Din al-Shirazi Ibn Taymiyyah Ibn Khaldun Jewish Medieval Isaac Israeli ben Solomon Saadia Gaon Solomon ibn Gabirol Judah Halevi Abraham ibn Daud Maimonides Nachmanides Gersonides Hasdai Crescas Joseph Albo Christian Early "Church Fathers" Augustine of Hippo Boethius Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite Isidore of Seville Johannes Scotus Eriugena Alcuin 11–12th century "Scholasticism" Anselm of Canterbury Peter Abelard Anselm of Laon Hugh of Saint Victor Richard of Saint Victor Roscelin Peter Lombard Alexander of Hales Bernard of Chartres Dominicus Gundissalinus Gilbert de la Porrée Alain de Lille 13–14th century Robert Grosseteste Albertus Magnus Bonaventure Thomas Aquinas Siger of Brabant Boetius of Dacia Henry of Ghent Roger Bacon John Peckham Ramon Llull Petrus Aureolus Petrus Peregrinus de Maricourt Durandus Giles of Rome Godfrey of Fontaines Duns Scotus William of Ockham Late Jean Buridan Nicole Oresme Albert of Saxony Francesc Eiximenis Vincent Ferrer Paul of Venice Lambertus de Monte John Hennon See also Renaissance philosophy v t e Catholic philosophy Ethics Cardinal virtues Divine command Just price Just war Probabilism Natural law Personalism Seven virtues Social teaching Theological virtues Virtue ethics Schools Medieval Augustinianism Scholasticism Thomism Scotism Occamism Modern Salamanca Christian humanism Cartesianism Molinism Neo-scholasticism Analytical Thomism Universals Augustinian realism Nominalism Conceptualism Moderate realism Scotistic realism Other Theological intellectualism Theological voluntarism Foundationalism Philosophers Clement Augustine Boethius Dionysius Isidore Eriugena Alcuin Anselm Abelard Lombard Albertus Bonaventure Aquinas Llull Scotus Occam Ficino Pico Erasmus Cusa Luis More Suárez Descartes Pierre Montaigne Pascal Krasicki Kołłątaj Staszic Newman Scheler Chesterton Maritain Stein Mortimer Rahner Anscombe MacIntyre Wojtyla Ratzinger Concepts Actus purus Actus Essendi Actus primus Quinque viae Theodicy Augustinian Irenaean Formal distinction Univocity Head of a pin Occam's razor Augustinian values Principle of double effect Seven deadly sins Quiddity Cardinal virtues Stratification of emotional life Disputation Evil demon Aevum Haecceity Cartesian dualism Divine illumination Peripatetic axiom Memento mori Ressentiment Rota Fortunae Double truth Ontological argument Utopia Trademark argument Pascal's wager Dehellenization Differentia Homo unius libri Cogito, ergo sum Infused righteousness Related Catholic theology Platonism Aristotelianism Neoplatonism Islamic philosophy Doctor of the Church Renaissance Rationalism Empiricism Phenomenology  Catholicism portal  Philosophy portal v t e Philosophy of religion Concepts in religion Afterlife Euthyphro dilemma Faith Intelligent design Miracle Problem of evil Religious belief Soul Spirit Theodicy Theological veto Conceptions of God Aristotelian view Brahman Demiurge Divine simplicity Egoism Holy Spirit Misotheism Pandeism Personal god Process theology Supreme Being Unmoved mover God in Abrahamic religions Buddhism Christianity Hinduism Islam Jainism Judaism Mormonism Sikhism Baháʼí Faith Wicca Existence of God For Beauty Christological Consciousness Cosmological Kalam Contingency Degree Desire Experience Fine-tuning of the universe Love Miracles Morality Necessary existent Ontological Pascal's wager Proper basis Reason Teleological Natural law Watchmaker analogy Transcendental Against 747 gambit Atheist's Wager Evil Free will Hell Inconsistent revelations Nonbelief Noncognitivism Occam's razor Omnipotence Poor design Russell's teapot Theology Acosmism Agnosticism Animism Antireligion Atheism Creationism Dharmism Deism Demonology Divine command theory Dualism Esotericism Exclusivism Existentialism Christian Agnostic Atheistic Feminist theology Thealogy Womanist theology Fideism Fundamentalism Gnosticism Henotheism Humanism Religious Secular Christian Inclusivism Theories about religions Monism Monotheism Mysticism Naturalism Metaphysical Religious Humanistic New Age Nondualism Nontheism Pandeism Panentheism Pantheism Perennialism Polytheism Possibilianism Process theology Religious skepticism Spiritualism Shamanism Taoic Theism Transcendentalism more... Religious language Eschatological verification Language game Logical positivism Apophatic theology Verificationism Problem of evil Augustinian theodicy Best of all possible worlds Euthyphro dilemma Inconsistent triad Irenaean theodicy Natural evil Theodicy Philosophers of religion (by date active) Ancient and medieval Anselm of Canterbury Augustine of Hippo Avicenna Averroes Boethius Erasmus Gaunilo of Marmoutiers Pico della Mirandola Heraclitus King James VI and I Marcion of Sinope Thomas Aquinas Maimonides Early modern Augustin Calmet René Descartes Blaise Pascal Baruch Spinoza Nicolas Malebranche Gottfried W Leibniz William Wollaston Thomas Chubb David Hume Baron d'Holbach Immanuel Kant Johann G Herder 1800 1850 Friedrich Schleiermacher Karl C F Krause Georg W F Hegel William Whewell Ludwig Feuerbach Søren Kierkegaard Karl Marx Albrecht Ritschl Afrikan Spir 1880 1900 Ernst Haeckel W K Clifford Friedrich Nietzsche Harald Høffding William James Vladimir Solovyov Ernst Troeltsch Rudolf Otto Lev Shestov Sergei Bulgakov Pavel Florensky Ernst Cassirer Joseph Maréchal 1920 postwar George Santayana Bertrand Russell Martin Buber René Guénon Paul Tillich Karl Barth Emil Brunner Rudolf Bultmann Gabriel Marcel Reinhold Niebuhr Charles Hartshorne Mircea Eliade Frithjof Schuon J L Mackie Walter Kaufmann Martin Lings Peter Geach George I Mavrodes William Alston Antony Flew 1970 1990 2010 William L Rowe Dewi Z Phillips Alvin Plantinga Anthony Kenny Nicholas Wolterstorff Richard Swinburne Robert Merrihew Adams Ravi Zacharias Peter van Inwagen Daniel Dennett Loyal Rue Jean-Luc Marion William Lane Craig Ali Akbar Rashad Alexander Pruss Related topics Criticism of religion Desacralization of knowledge Ethics in religion Exegesis History of religion Religion Religious language Religious philosophy Relationship between religion and science Faith and rationality more... Portal Category Authority control BIBSYS: 90083479 BNE: XX859481 BNF: cb14840639m (data) CANTIC: a10490036 CiNii: DA01010815 GND: 11851282X ICCU: IT\ICCU\CFIV\082200 ISNI: 0000 0001 2283 4442 LCCN: n79029805 LNB: 000002771 MBA: febb8d96-761d-4c19-b0c3-cb53d8a2dd52 NDL: 00434105 NKC: jn19981000321 NLA: 35019855 NLG: 77346 NLI: 001790325 NLK: KAC199602875 NSK: 000232260 NTA: 068554923 RERO: 02-A000021134 SELIBR: 224936 SNAC: w6s75djd SUDOC: 026650045 Trove: 794148 ULAN: 500355319 VcBA: 495/44468 VIAF: 100218964 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n79029805 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boethius&oldid=995679950" Categories: 477 births 524 deaths 5th-century Italo-Roman people 6th-century Christian saints 6th-century Christian theologians 6th-century Italo-Roman people 6th-century Italian writers 6th-century Latin writers 6th-century mathematicians 6th-century philosophers Ancient Roman rhetoricians Anicii Augustinian philosophers Burials at San Pietro in Ciel d'Oro Deaths by blade weapons Executed ancient Roman people Executed philosophers Executed writers Greek–Latin translators Imperial Roman consuls Last of the Romans Latin commentators on Aristotle Magistri officiorum Manlii Music theorists People of the Ostrogothic Kingdom Philosophers of Roman Italy Catholic philosophers Neoplatonists Roman-era philosophers Italian logicians Hidden categories: Articles incorporating a citation from the 1913 Catholic Encyclopedia with Wikisource reference Harv and Sfn multiple-target errors CS1 German-language sources (de) CS1 Italian-language sources (it) Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata Articles with hCards All articles with incomplete citations Articles with incomplete citations from October 2015 All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from October 2013 Articles with unsourced statements from October 2017 All articles with failed verification Articles with failed verification from October 2017 CS1 Latin-language sources (la) Commons category link is on Wikidata Articles with Project Gutenberg links Articles with Internet Archive links Articles with LibriVox links Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CANTIC identifiers Wikipedia articles with CINII identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ICCU identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with LNB identifiers Wikipedia articles with MusicBrainz identifiers Wikipedia articles with NDL identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLG identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLI identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NSK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with RERO identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SNAC-ID identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with Trove identifiers Wikipedia articles with ULAN identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers AC with 27 elements Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikiquote Wikisource Languages Ænglisc العربية Asturianu Azərbaycanca Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ Български Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français Frysk Galego 한국어 Հայերեն हिन्दी Hrvatski Ido Bahasa Indonesia Íslenska Italiano עברית ქართული Қазақша Kiswahili Кыргызча Latina Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Македонски Malagasy മലയാളം مصرى Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Norsk nynorsk Occitan Piemontèis Plattdüütsch Polski Português Română Русский Sardu Scots Shqip Sicilianu Simple English Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Türkçe Українська Tiếng Việt Winaray 吴语 粵語 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 22 December 2020, at 08:48 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1692 ---- Byzantine Empire - Wikipedia Byzantine Empire From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Roman Empire during Late Antiquity and the Middle Ages "Byzantine" redirects here. For other uses, see Byzantine (disambiguation). Byzantine Empire Βασιλεία Ῥωμαίων, Basileía Rhōmaíōn Imperium Romanum 395–1453c Chi Rho (see Byzantine insignia) Solidus depicting Christ Pantocrator, a common motif on Byzantine coins. The empire in 555 under Justinian the Great, at its greatest extent since the fall of the Western Roman Empire (its vassals in pink) The change of territory of the Byzantine Empire (476–1400) Capital and largest city Constantinopled (395–1204, 1261–1453) Common languages Late Latin, Koine Greek Medieval Greek (610–1453) Religion Eastern Christianity (tolerated after the Edicts of Serdica (311) and Milan (313); state religion after 380) Eastern Orthodoxy (following the Schism of 1054) Notable emperors   • 330–337 Constantine I • 395–408 Arcadius • 402–450 Theodosius II • 527–565 Justinian I • 610–641 Heraclius • 717–741 Leo III • 797–802 Irene • 867–886 Basil I • 976–1025 Basil II • 1042–1055 Constantine IX • 1081–1118 Alexius I • 1259–1282 Michael VIII • 1449–1453 Constantine XI Historical era Late Antiquity to Late Middle Ages • First division of the Roman Empire (diarchy) 1 April 286 • Founding of Constantinople 11 May 330 • Final East–West division after the death of Theodosius I 17 January 395 • Fall of Rome; deposition of Romulus Augustulus by Odoacer 4 September 476 • Assassination of Julius Nepos; nominal end of the Western Roman Empire 25 April 480 • Fourth Crusade; establishment of the Latin Empire by Catholic crusaders 12 April 1204 • Reconquest of Constantinople by Michael VIII Palaiologos 25 July 1261 • Fall of Constantinople 29 May 1453 • Fall of Trebizond 15 August 1461 Population • 457 16,000,000e • 565 26,000,000 • 775 7,000,000 • 1025 12,000,000 • 1320 2,000,000 Currency Solidus, denarius and hyperpyron Preceded by Succeeded by Roman Empire Ottoman Empire ^ Βασιλεία Ῥωμαίων may be transliterated in Latin as Basileia Rhōmaiōn (literally meaning Monarchy of the Romans, but commonly rendered Empire of the Romans). ^ Roman Empire ^ Between 1204 and 1261 there was an interregnum when the Empire was divided into the Empire of Nicaea, the Empire of Trebizond and the Despotate of Epirus, which were all contenders for rule of the Empire. The Empire of Nicaea is considered the legitimate continuation of the Byzantine Empire because it managed to retake Constantinople. ^ Constantinople became the capital of the (united) empire in 330. Theodosius I was the last emperor to rule over both the Eastern and Western Roman Empire. He died in 395 AD, dividing the empire in western and eastern halves. ^ See Population of the Byzantine Empire for more detailed figures taken provided by McEvedy and Jones, Atlas of World Population History, 1978, as well as Angeliki E. Laiou, The Economic History of Byzantium, 2002. Part of a series on the History of the Byzantine Empire Preceding Roman Empire Dominate Early period (330–717) Constantinian–Valentinianic era (Constantinian dynasty – Valentinianic dynasty) Theodosian era Leonid era Justinian era Heraclian era Twenty Years' Anarchy Middle period (717–1204) Isaurian era Nikephorian era Amorian era Macedonian era Doukid era Komnenian era Angelid era Late period (1204–1453) Fourth Crusade and Latin rule Latin Empire Principality of Achaea others Byzantine successor states Nicaea Epirus/Thessalonica Trebizond Theodoro Palaiologan era Despotate of the Morea Decline of the Byzantine Empire Fall of Constantinople Timeline By topic Art Government Economy Army Navy  Byzantine Empire portal v t e The Byzantine Empire, also referred to as the Eastern Roman Empire, or Byzantium, was the continuation of the Roman Empire in its eastern provinces during Late Antiquity and the Middle Ages, when its capital city was Constantinople (modern Istanbul, formerly Byzantium). It survived the fragmentation and fall of the Western Roman Empire in the 5th century AD and continued to exist for an additional thousand years until it fell to the Ottoman Empire in 1453.[1] During most of its existence, the empire was the most powerful economic, cultural, and military force in Europe. "Byzantine Empire" is a term created after the end of the realm; its citizens continued to refer to their empire simply as the Roman Empire (Medieval Greek: Βασιλεία Ῥωμαίων, romanized: Basileía Rhōmaíōn)[2] or Romania (Medieval Greek: Ῥωμανία), and to themselves as Romans (Medieval Greek: Ῥωμαῖοι, romanized: Rhōmaîoi). Several signal events from the 4th to 6th centuries mark the period of transition during which the Roman Empire's Greek East and Latin West diverged. Constantine I (r. 324–337) reorganised the empire, made Constantinople the new capital and legalised Christianity. Under Theodosius I (r. 379–395), Christianity became the state religion and other religious practices were proscribed. In the reign of Heraclius (r. 610–641), the Empire's military and administration were restructured and adopted Greek for official use in place of Latin.[3] Although the Roman state continued and its traditions were maintained, modern historians distinguish Byzantium from ancient Rome insofar as it was centred on Constantinople, oriented towards Greek rather than Latin culture and characterised by Eastern Orthodox Christianity.[4] The borders of the empire fluctuated through several cycles of decline and recovery. During the reign of Justinian I (r. 527–565), the empire reached its greatest extent, after reconquering much of the historically Roman western Mediterranean coast, including North Africa, Italy and Rome, which it held for two more centuries. The Byzantine–Sasanian War of 602–628 exhausted the empire's resources, and during the Early Muslim conquests of the 7th century, it lost its richest provinces, Egypt and Syria, to the Rashidun Caliphate.[5] During the Macedonian dynasty (10th–11th centuries), the empire expanded again and experienced the two-century long Macedonian Renaissance, which came to an end with the loss of much of Asia Minor to the Seljuk Turks after the Battle of Manzikert in 1071. This battle opened the way for the Turks to settle in Anatolia. The empire recovered during the Komnenian restoration, and by the 12th century Constantinople was the largest and wealthiest city in Europe.[6] The Byzantine Empire was delivered a mortal blow during the Fourth Crusade, when Constantinople was sacked in 1204 and the territories that the empire formerly governed were divided into competing Byzantine Greek and Latin realms. Despite the eventual recovery of Constantinople in 1261, the Byzantine Empire remained only one of several small rival states in the area for the final two centuries of its existence. Its remaining territories were progressively annexed by the Ottomans in the Byzantine–Ottoman wars over the 14th and 15th centuries. The fall of Constantinople to the Ottoman Empire in 1453 ended the Byzantine Empire.[7] The last of the imperial Byzantine successor states, the Empire of Trebizond, would be conquered by the Ottomans eight years later in the 1461 siege.[8] Contents 1 Nomenclature 2 History 2.1 Early history 2.2 Christianization and partition of the Empire 2.3 Loss of the Western Roman Empire 2.4 Justinian dynasty 2.5 Shrinking borders 2.5.1 Early Heraclian dynasty 2.5.2 First Arab Siege of Constantinople (674–678) and the theme system 2.5.3 Late Heraclian dynasty 2.5.4 Second Arab Siege of Constantinople (717–718) and the Isaurian dynasty 2.5.5 Religious dispute over iconoclasm 2.6 Macedonian dynasty and resurgence (867–1025) 2.6.1 Wars against the Abbasids 2.6.2 Wars against the Bulgarian Empire 2.6.3 Relations with the Kievan Rus' 2.6.4 Campaigns in the Caucasus 2.6.5 Apex 2.6.6 Split between Orthodoxy and Catholicism (1054) 2.7 Crisis and fragmentation 2.8 Komnenian dynasty and the Crusades 2.8.1 Alexios I and the First Crusade 2.8.2 John II, Manuel I and the Second Crusade 2.8.3 12th-century Renaissance 2.9 Decline and disintegration 2.9.1 Angelid dynasty 2.9.2 Fourth Crusade 2.9.3 Crusader sack of Constantinople (1204) 2.10 Fall 2.10.1 Empire in exile 2.10.2 Reconquest of Constantinople 2.10.3 Rise of the Ottomans and fall of Constantinople 2.11 Political aftermath 3 Government and bureaucracy 3.1 Diplomacy 4 Science, medicine and law 5 Culture 5.1 Religion 5.2 Arts 5.2.1 Art and literature 5.2.2 Music 5.3 Cuisine 5.4 Flags and insignia 5.5 Language 5.6 Recreation 6 Economy 7 Legacy 8 See also 9 Notes 10 References 10.1 Citations 10.2 Sources 10.2.1 Primary sources 10.2.2 Secondary sources 11 Further reading 12 External links 12.1 Byzantine studies, resources and bibliography Nomenclature[edit] See also: Names of the Greeks The first use of the term "Byzantine" to label the later years of the Roman Empire was in 1557, 104 years after the empire's collapse, when the German historian Hieronymus Wolf published his work Corpus Historiæ Byzantinæ, a collection of historical sources. The term comes from "Byzantium", the name of the city to which Constantine moved his capital, leaving Rome, and rebuilt under the new name of Constantinople. The older name of the city would rarely be used from this point onward except in historical or poetic contexts. The publication in 1648 of the Byzantine du Louvre (Corpus Scriptorum Historiae Byzantinae), and in 1680 of Du Cange's Historia Byzantina further popularised the use of "Byzantine" among French authors, such as Montesquieu.[9] However, it was not until the mid-19th century that the term came into general use in the Western world.[10] The Byzantine Empire was known to its inhabitants as the "Roman Empire" or the "Empire of the Romans" (Latin: Imperium Romanum, Imperium Romanorum; Medieval Greek: Βασιλεία τῶν Ῥωμαίων, Ἀρχὴ τῶν Ῥωμαίων, romanized: Basileia tōn Rhōmaiōn, Archē tōn Rhōmaiōn), Romania (Latin: Romania; Medieval Greek: Ῥωμανία, romanized: Rhōmania),[note 1] the Roman Republic (Latin: Res Publica Romana; Medieval Greek: Πολιτεία τῶν Ῥωμαίων, romanized: Politeia tōn Rhōmaiōn), or in Greek "Rhōmais" Medieval Greek: Ῥωμαΐς).[13] The inhabitants called themselves Romaioi and even as late as the 19th century Greeks typically referred to Modern Greek as Romaiika "Romaic".[14] After 1204 when the Byzantine Empire was mostly confined to its purely Greek provinces the term 'Hellenes' was increasingly used instead.[15] While the Byzantine Empire had a multi-ethnic character during most of its history[16] and preserved Romano-Hellenistic traditions,[17] it became identified by its western and northern contemporaries with its increasingly predominant Greek element.[18] Western medieval sources also referred to the empire as the "Empire of the Greeks" (Latin: Imperium Graecorum) and to its emperor as Imperator Graecorum (Emperor of the Greeks);[19] these terms were used to distinguish it from the Holy Roman Empire that claimed the prestige of the classical Roman Empire in the West.[20] No such distinction existed in the Islamic and Slavic worlds, where the Empire was more straightforwardly seen as the continuation of the Roman Empire. In the Islamic world, the Roman Empire was known primarily as Rûm.[21] The name millet-i Rûm, or "Roman nation," was used by the Ottomans until the 20th century to refer to the former subjects of the Byzantine Empire, that is, the Orthodox Christian community within Ottoman realms. History[edit] Main article: History of the Byzantine Empire Early history[edit] Constantine the Great was the first Roman emperor to convert to Christianity and moved the seat of the empire to Byzantium, renamed Constantinople in his honor. The Roman army succeeded in conquering many territories covering the Mediterranean region and coastal regions in southwestern Europe and North Africa. These territories were home to many different cultural groups, both urban populations, and rural populations. Generally speaking, the eastern Mediterranean provinces were more urbanized than the western, having previously been united under the Macedonian Empire and Hellenised by the influence of Greek culture.[22] The West also suffered more heavily from the instability of the 3rd century AD. This distinction between the established Hellenised East and the younger Latinised West persisted and became increasingly important in later centuries, leading to a gradual estrangement of the two worlds.[22] An early instance of the partition of the Empire into East and West occurred in 293 when Emperor Diocletian created a new administrative system (the tetrarchy), to guarantee security in all endangered regions of his Empire. He associated himself with a co-emperor (Augustus), and each co-emperor then adopted a young colleague given the title of Caesar, to share in their rule and eventually to succeed the senior partner. Each tetrarch was in charge of a part of the Empire. The tetrarchy collapsed, however, in 313 and a few years later Constantine I reunited the two administrative divisions of the Empire as sole Augustus.[23] Christianization and partition of the Empire[edit] See also: Byzantium under the Constantinian and Valentinian dynasties Restored section of the Walls of Constantinople After the death of Theodosius I in 395, the empire was again divided. The west disintegrated in the late 400s while the east ended with the fall of Constantinople in 1453.   The Western Roman Empire   The Eastern Roman/Byzantine Empire In 330, Constantine moved the seat of the Empire to Constantinople, which he founded as a second Rome on the site of Byzantium, a city strategically located on the trade routes between Europe and Asia and between the Mediterranean and the Black Sea. Constantine introduced important changes to the Empire's military, monetary, civil and religious institutions. In regards to his economic policies he has been accused by certain scholars of "reckless fiscality", but the gold solidus he introduced became a stable currency that transformed the economy and promoted development.[24] Under Constantine, Christianity did not become the exclusive religion of the state but enjoyed imperial preference since he supported it with generous privileges. Constantine established the principle that emperors could not settle questions of doctrine on their own but should summon instead general ecclesiastical councils for that purpose. His convening of both the Synod of Arles and the First Council of Nicaea indicated his interest in the unity of the Church, and showcased his claim to be its head.[25] The rise of Christianity was briefly interrupted on the accession of the emperor Julian in 361, who made a determined effort to restore polytheism throughout the empire and was thus dubbed "Julian the Apostate" by the Church.[26] However, this was reversed when Julian was killed in battle in 363.[27] Theodosius I (379–395) was the last Emperor to rule both the Eastern and Western halves of the Empire. In 391 and 392 he issued a series of edicts essentially banning pagan religion. Pagan festivals and sacrifices were banned, as was access to all pagan temples and places of worship.[28] The last Olympic Games are believed to have been held in 393.[29] In 395, Theodosius I bequeathed the imperial office jointly to his sons: Arcadius in the East and Honorius in the West, once again dividing Imperial administration. In the 5th century the Eastern part of the empire was largely spared the difficulties faced by the West – due in part to a more established urban culture and greater financial resources, which allowed it to placate invaders with tribute and pay foreign mercenaries. This success allowed Theodosius II to focus on the codification of Roman law and further fortification of the walls of Constantinople, which left the city impervious to most attacks until 1204.[30] Large portions of the Theodosian Walls are preserved to the present day. To fend off the Huns, Theodosius had to pay an enormous annual tribute to Attila. His successor, Marcian, refused to continue to pay the tribute, but Attila had already diverted his attention to the Western Roman Empire. After Attila's death in 453, the Hun Empire collapsed, and many of the remaining Huns were often hired as mercenaries by Constantinople.[31] Loss of the Western Roman Empire[edit] After the fall of Attila, the Eastern Empire enjoyed a period of peace, while the Western Empire continued to deteriorate due to the expanding migration and invasions of the "barbarians", most prominently the Germanic nations. The West's end is usually dated 476 when the East Germanic Roman foederati general Odoacer deposed the Western Emperor Romulus Augustulus, a year after the latter usurped the position from Julius Nepos.[32] In 480 with the death of Julius Nepos, Eastern Emperor Zeno became sole claimant to Emperor of the empire. Odoacer, now ruler of Italy, was nominally Zeno's subordinate but acted with complete autonomy, eventually providing support to a rebellion against the Emperor.[33] Zeno negotiated with the invading Ostrogoths, who had settled in Moesia, convincing the Gothic king Theodoric to depart for Italy as magister militum per Italiam ("commander in chief for Italy") with the aim of deposing Odoacer. By urging Theodoric to conquer Italy, Zeno rid the Eastern Empire of an unruly subordinate (Odoacer) and moved another (Theodoric) further from the heart of the Empire. After Odoacer's defeat in 493, Theodoric ruled Italy de facto, although he was never recognised by the eastern emperors as "king" (rex).[33] In 491, Anastasius I, an aged civil officer of Roman origin, became Emperor, but it was not until 497 that the forces of the new emperor effectively took the measure of Isaurian resistance.[34] Anastasius revealed himself as an energetic reformer and an able administrator. He introduced a new coinage system of the copper follis, the coin used in most everyday transactions.[35] He also reformed the tax system and permanently abolished the chrysargyron tax. The State Treasury contained the enormous sum of 320,000 lb (150,000 kg) of gold when Anastasius died in 518.[36] Justinian dynasty[edit] See also: Byzantine Empire under the Justinian dynasty Emperor Justinian (left) and (presumed) general Belisarius (right) (Mosaic from Basilica of San Vitale, 6th century) Empress Theodora and attendants (Mosaic from Basilica of San Vitale, 6th century) Hagia Sophia built in AD 537, during the reign of Justinian The Byzantine Empire in c. 600 during the reign of Maurice. Half of the Italian peninsula and most of southern Hispania were lost, but the eastern borders expanded gaining land from the Persians. The Justinian dynasty was founded by Justin I, who though illiterate, rose through the ranks of the military to become Emperor in 518.[37] He was succeeded by his nephew Justinian I in 527, who may already have exerted effective control during Justin's reign.[38] One of the most important figures of late antiquity and possibly the last Roman emperor to speak Latin as a first language,[39] Justinian's rule constitutes a distinct epoch, marked by the ambitious but only partly realised renovatio imperii, or "restoration of the Empire".[40] His wife Theodora was particularly influential.[41] In 529, Justinian appointed a ten-man commission chaired by John the Cappadocian to revise Roman law and create a new codification of laws and jurists' extracts, known as the "Corpus Juris Civilis", or the Justinian Code. In 534, the Corpus was updated and, along with the enactments promulgated by Justinian after 534, formed the system of law used for most of the rest of the Byzantine era.[42] The Corpus forms the basis of civil law of many modern states.[43] In 532, attempting to secure his eastern frontier, Justinian signed a peace treaty with Khosrau I of Persia, agreeing to pay a large annual tribute to the Sassanids. In the same year, he survived a revolt in Constantinople (the Nika riots), which solidified his power but ended with the deaths of a reported 30,000 to 35,000 rioters on his orders.[44] The western conquests began in 533, as Justinian sent his general Belisarius to reclaim the former province of Africa from the Vandals, who had been in control since 429 with their capital at Carthage.[45] Their success came with surprising ease, but it was not until 548 that the major local tribes were subdued.[46] In 535, a small Byzantine expedition to Sicily met with easy success, but the Goths soon stiffened their resistance, and victory did not come until 540, when Belisarius captured Ravenna, after successful sieges of Naples and Rome.[47] In 535–536, Theodahad sent Pope Agapetus I to Constantinople to request the removal of Byzantine forces from Sicily, Dalmatia, and Italy. Although Agapetus failed in his mission to sign a peace with Justinian, he succeeded in having the Monophysite Patriarch Anthimus I of Constantinople denounced, despite Empress Theodora's support and protection.[48] The Ostrogoths captured Rome in 546. Belisarius, who had been sent back to Italy in 544, was eventually recalled to Constantinople in 549.[49] The arrival of the Armenian eunuch Narses in Italy (late 551) with an army of 35,000 men marked another shift in Gothic fortunes. Totila was defeated at the Battle of Taginae and his successor, Teia, was defeated at the Battle of Mons Lactarius (October 552). Despite continuing resistance from a few Gothic garrisons and two subsequent invasions by the Franks and Alemanni, the war for the Italian peninsula was at an end.[50] In 551, Athanagild, a noble from Visigothic Hispania, sought Justinian's help in a rebellion against the king, and the emperor dispatched a force under Liberius, a successful military commander. The empire held on to a small slice of the Iberian Peninsula coast until the reign of Heraclius.[51] In the east, the Roman–Persian Wars continued until 561 when the envoys of Justinian and Khosrau agreed on a 50-year peace.[52] By the mid-550s, Justinian had won victories in most theatres of operation, with the notable exception of the Balkans, which were subjected to repeated incursions from the Slavs and the Gepids. Tribes of Serbs and Croats were later resettled in the northwestern Balkans, during the reign of Heraclius.[53] Justinian called Belisarius out of retirement and defeated the new Hunnish threat. The strengthening of the Danube fleet caused the Kutrigur Huns to withdraw and they agreed to a treaty that allowed safe passage back across the Danube.[54] Although polytheism had been suppressed by the state since at least the time of Constantine in the 4th century, traditional Greco-Roman culture was still influential in the Eastern empire in the 6th century.[55] Hellenistic philosophy began to be gradually amalgamated into newer Christian philosophy. Philosophers such as John Philoponus drew on neoplatonic ideas in addition to Christian thought and empiricism. Because of active paganism of its professors Justinian closed down the Neoplatonic Academy in 529. Other schools continued in Constantinople, Antioch and Alexandria, which were the centers of Justinian's empire.[56] Hymns written by Romanos the Melodist marked the development of the Divine Liturgy, while the architects Isidore of Miletus and Anthemius of Tralles worked to complete the new Church of the Holy Wisdom, Hagia Sophia, which was designed to replace an older church destroyed during the Nika Revolt. Completed in 537, the Hagia Sophia stands today as one of the major monuments of Byzantine architectural history.[57] During the 6th and 7th centuries, the Empire was struck by a series of epidemics, which greatly devastated the population and contributed to a significant economic decline and a weakening of the Empire.[58] After Justinian died in 565, his successor, Justin II, refused to pay the large tribute to the Persians. Meanwhile, the Germanic Lombards invaded Italy; by the end of the century, only a third of Italy was in Byzantine hands. Justin's successor, Tiberius II, choosing between his enemies, awarded subsidies to the Avars while taking military action against the Persians. Although Tiberius' general, Maurice, led an effective campaign on the eastern frontier, subsidies failed to restrain the Avars. They captured the Balkan fortress of Sirmium in 582, while the Slavs began to make inroads across the Danube.[59] Maurice, who meanwhile succeeded Tiberius, intervened in a Persian civil war, placed the legitimate Khosrau II back on the throne, and married his daughter to him. Maurice's treaty with his new brother-in-law enlarged the territories of the Empire to the East and allowed the energetic Emperor to focus on the Balkans. By 602, a series of successful Byzantine campaigns had pushed the Avars and Slavs back across the Danube.[59] However, Maurice's refusal to ransom several thousand captives taken by the Avars, and his order to the troops to winter in the Danube, caused his popularity to plummet. A revolt broke out under an officer named Phocas, who marched the troops back to Constantinople; Maurice and his family were murdered while trying to escape.[60] Shrinking borders[edit] Early Heraclian dynasty[edit] Further information: Byzantine Empire under the Heraclian dynasty Battle between Heraclius and the Persians. Fresco by Piero della Francesca, c. 1452 By 650 (pictured) the empire had lost all its southern provinces, except the Exarchate of Africa, to the Rashidun Caliphate. At the same time the Slavs invaded and settled in the Balkans. After Maurice's murder by Phocas, Khosrau used the pretext to reconquer the Roman province of Mesopotamia.[61] Phocas, an unpopular ruler invariably described in Byzantine sources as a "tyrant", was the target of a number of Senate-led plots. He was eventually deposed in 610 by Heraclius, who sailed to Constantinople from Carthage with an icon affixed to the prow of his ship.[62] Following the accession of Heraclius, the Sassanid advance pushed deep into the Levant, occupying Damascus and Jerusalem and removing the True Cross to Ctesiphon.[63] The counter-attack launched by Heraclius took on the character of a holy war, and an acheiropoietos image of Christ was carried as a military standard[64] (similarly, when Constantinople was saved from a combined Avar–Sassanid–Slavic siege in 626, the victory was attributed to the icons of the Virgin that were led in procession by Patriarch Sergius about the walls of the city).[65] In this very siege of Constantinople of the year 626, amidst the climactic Byzantine–Sasanian War of 602–628, the combined Avar, Sassanid, and Slavic forces unsuccessfully besieged the Byzantine capital between June and July. After this, the Sassanid army was forced to withdraw to Anatolia. The loss came just after news had reached them of yet another Byzantine victory, where Heraclius's brother Theodore scored well against the Persian general Shahin.[66] Following this, Heraclius led an invasion into Sassanid Mesopotamia once again. The main Sassanid force was destroyed at Nineveh in 627, and in 629 Heraclius restored the True Cross to Jerusalem in a majestic ceremony,[67] as he marched into the Sassanid capital of Ctesiphon, where anarchy and civil war reigned as a result of the enduring war. Eventually, the Persians were obliged to withdraw all armed forces and return Sassanid-ruled Egypt, the Levant and whatever imperial territories of Mesopotamia and Armenia were in Roman hands at the time of an earlier peace treaty in c. 595. The war had exhausted both the Byzantines and Sassanids, however, and left them extremely vulnerable to the Muslim forces that emerged in the following years.[68] The Byzantines suffered a crushing defeat by the Arabs at the Battle of Yarmouk in 636, while Ctesiphon fell in 637.[69] First Arab Siege of Constantinople (674–678) and the theme system[edit] Greek fire was first used by the Byzantine Navy during the Byzantine–Arab Wars (from the Madrid Skylitzes, Biblioteca Nacional de España, Madrid). The Arabs, now firmly in control of Syria and the Levant, sent frequent raiding parties deep into Asia Minor, and in 674–678 laid siege to Constantinople itself. The Arab fleet was finally repulsed through the use of Greek fire, and a thirty-years' truce was signed between the Empire and the Umayyad Caliphate.[70] However, the Anatolian raids continued unabated, and accelerated the demise of classical urban culture, with the inhabitants of many cities either refortifying much smaller areas within the old city walls, or relocating entirely to nearby fortresses.[71] Constantinople itself dropped substantially in size, from 500,000 inhabitants to just 40,000–70,000, and, like other urban centres, it was partly ruralised. The city also lost the free grain shipments in 618, after Egypt fell first to the Persians and then to the Arabs, and public wheat distribution ceased.[72] The void left by the disappearance of the old semi-autonomous civic institutions was filled by the system called theme, which entailed dividing Asia Minor into "provinces" occupied by distinct armies that assumed civil authority and answered directly to the imperial administration. This system may have had its roots in certain ad hoc measures taken by Heraclius, but over the course of the 7th century it developed into an entirely new system of imperial governance.[73] The massive cultural and institutional restructuring of the Empire consequent on the loss of territory in the 7th century has been said to have caused a decisive break in east Mediterranean Romanness and that the Byzantine state is subsequently best understood as another successor state rather than a real continuation of the Roman Empire.[74] Late Heraclian dynasty[edit] See also: Twenty Years' Anarchy Constantine IV and his retinue, mosaic in Basilica of Sant'Apollinare in Classe. Constantine IV defeated the First Arab Siege of Constantinople. The withdrawal of large numbers of troops from the Balkans to combat the Persians and then the Arabs in the east opened the door for the gradual southward expansion of Slavic peoples into the peninsula, and, as in Asia Minor, many cities shrank to small fortified settlements.[75] In the 670s, the Bulgars were pushed south of the Danube by the arrival of the Khazars. In 680, Byzantine forces sent to disperse these new settlements were defeated.[76] In 681, Constantine IV signed a treaty with the Bulgar khan Asparukh, and the new Bulgarian state assumed sovereignty over a number of Slavic tribes that had previously, at least in name, recognised Byzantine rule.[76] In 687–688, the final Heraclian emperor, Justinian II, led an expedition against the Slavs and Bulgarians, and made significant gains, although the fact that he had to fight his way from Thrace to Macedonia demonstrates the degree to which Byzantine power in the north Balkans had declined.[77] Justinian II attempted to break the power of the urban aristocracy through severe taxation and the appointment of "outsiders" to administrative posts. He was driven from power in 695, and took shelter first with the Khazars and then with the Bulgarians. In 705, he returned to Constantinople with the armies of the Bulgarian khan Tervel, retook the throne, and instituted a reign of terror against his enemies. With his final overthrow in 711, supported once more by the urban aristocracy, the Heraclian dynasty came to an end.[78] Second Arab Siege of Constantinople (717–718) and the Isaurian dynasty[edit] Further information: Byzantine Empire under the Isaurian dynasty The Byzantine Empire at the accession of Leo III, c. 717. Striped indicates areas raided by the Umayyads. Gold solidus of Leo III (left), and his son and heir, Constantine V (right) In 717 the Umayyad Caliphate launched the Siege of Constantinople (717–718) which lasted for one year. However, the combination of Leo III the Isaurian's military genius, the Byzantines' use of Greek Fire, a cold winter in 717–718, and Byzantine diplomacy with the Khan Tervel of Bulgaria resulted in a Byzantine victory. After Leo III turned back the Muslim assault in 718, he addressed himself to the task of reorganising and consolidating the themes in Asia Minor. In 740 a major Byzantine victory took place at the Battle of Akroinon where the Byzantines destroyed the Umayyad army once again. Leo III the Isaurian's son and successor, Constantine V, won noteworthy victories in northern Syria and also thoroughly undermined Bulgarian strength.[79] In 746, profiting by the unstable conditions in the Umayyad Caliphate, which was falling apart under Marwan II, Constantine V invaded Syria and captured Germanikeia and the Battle of Keramaia resulted in a major Byzantine naval victory over the Umayyad fleet. Coupled with military defeats on other fronts of the Caliphate and internal instability, Umayyad expansion came to an end. Religious dispute over iconoclasm[edit] Main article: Byzantine iconoclasm A Simple Cross: An example of Iconoclast art in the Hagia Irene Church in Istanbul. The 8th and early 9th centuries were also dominated by controversy and religious division over Iconoclasm, which was the main political issue in the Empire for over a century. Icons (here meaning all forms of religious imagery) were banned by Leo and Constantine from around 730, leading to revolts by iconodules (supporters of icons) throughout the empire. After the efforts of empress Irene, the Second Council of Nicaea met in 787 and affirmed that icons could be venerated but not worshipped. Irene is said to have endeavoured to negotiate a marriage between herself and Charlemagne, but, according to Theophanes the Confessor, the scheme was frustrated by Aetios, one of her favourites.[80] In the early 9th century, Leo V reintroduced the policy of iconoclasm, but in 843 Empress Theodora restored the veneration of icons with the help of Patriarch Methodios.[81] Iconoclasm played a part in the further alienation of East from West, which worsened during the so-called Photian schism, when Pope Nicholas I challenged the elevation of Photios to the patriarchate.[82] Macedonian dynasty and resurgence (867–1025)[edit] See also: Byzantine Empire under the Macedonian dynasty The Byzantine Empire, c. 867 The accession of Basil I to the throne in 867 marks the beginning of the Macedonian dynasty, which would rule for the next two and a half centuries. This dynasty included some of the most able emperors in Byzantium's history, and the period is one of revival and resurgence. The Empire moved from defending against external enemies to reconquest of territories formerly lost.[83] In addition to a reassertion of Byzantine military power and political authority, the period under the Macedonian dynasty is characterised by a cultural revival in spheres such as philosophy and the arts. There was a conscious effort to restore the brilliance of the period before the Slavic and subsequent Arab invasions, and the Macedonian era has been dubbed the "Golden Age" of Byzantium.[83] Although the Empire was significantly smaller than during the reign of Justinian, it had regained significant strength, as the remaining territories were less geographically dispersed and more politically, economically, and culturally integrated. Wars against the Abbasids[edit] Main article: Arab–Byzantine wars The general Leo Phokas defeats the Hamdanid Emirate of Aleppo at Andrassos in 960, from the Madrid Skylitzes Taking advantage of the Empire's weakness after the Revolt of Thomas the Slav in the early 820s, the Arabs re-emerged and captured Crete. They also successfully attacked Sicily, but in 863 general Petronas gained a decisive victory against Umar al-Aqta, the emir of Melitene (Malatya). Under the leadership of emperor Krum, the Bulgarian threat also re-emerged, but in 815–816 Krum's son, Omurtag, signed a peace treaty with Leo V.[84] In the 830s Abbasid Caliphate started military excursions culminating with a victory in the Sack of Amorium. The Byzantines then counter-attacked and sacked Damietta in Egypt. Later the Abbasid Caliphate responded by sending their troops into Anatolia again, sacking and marauding until they were eventually annihilated by the Byzantines in 863. In the early years of Basil I's reign, Arab raids on the coasts of Dalmatia were successfully repelled, and the region once again came under secure Byzantine control. This enabled Byzantine missionaries to penetrate to the interior and convert the Serbs and the principalities of modern-day Herzegovina and Montenegro to Christianity.[85] By contrast, the Byzantine position in Southern Italy was gradually consolidated so that by 873 Bari was once again under Byzantine rule,[85] and most of Southern Italy would remain in the Empire for the next 200 years.[86] On the more important eastern front, the Empire rebuilt its defences and went on the offensive. The Paulicians were defeated and their capital of Tephrike (Divrigi) taken, while the offensive against the Abbasid Caliphate began with the recapture of Samosata.[85] 10th century military successes were coupled with a major cultural revival, the so-called Macedonian Renaissance. Miniature from the Paris Psalter, an example of Hellenistic-influenced art. Under Basil's son and successor, Leo VI the Wise, the gains in the east against the now-weak Abbasid Caliphate continued. However, Sicily was lost to the Arabs in 902, and in 904 Thessaloniki, the Empire's second city, was sacked by an Arab fleet. The naval weakness of the Empire was rectified. Despite this revenge the Byzantines were still unable to strike a decisive blow against the Muslims, who inflicted a crushing defeat on the imperial forces when they attempted to regain Crete in 911.[87] The death of the Bulgarian tsar Simeon I in 927 severely weakened the Bulgarians, allowing the Byzantines to concentrate on the eastern front.[88] Melitene was permanently recaptured in 934, and in 943 the famous general John Kourkouas continued the offensive in Mesopotamia with some noteworthy victories, culminating in the reconquest of Edessa. Kourkouas was especially celebrated for returning to Constantinople the venerated Mandylion, a relic purportedly imprinted with a portrait of Christ.[89] The soldier-emperors Nikephoros II Phokas (r. 963–969) and John I Tzimiskes (969–976) expanded the empire well into Syria, defeating the emirs of north-west Iraq. The great city of Aleppo was taken by Nikephoros in 962 and the Arabs were decisively expelled from Crete in 963. The recapture of Crete put an end to Arab raids in the Aegean allowing mainland Greece to flourish once again. Cyprus was permanently retaken in 965 and the successes of Nikephoros culminated in 969 with the recapture of Antioch, which he incorporated as a province of the Empire.[90] His successor John Tzimiskes recaptured Damascus, Beirut, Acre, Sidon, Caesarea, and Tiberias, putting Byzantine armies within striking distance of Jerusalem, although the Muslim power centres in Iraq and Egypt were left untouched.[91] After much campaigning in the north, the last Arab threat to Byzantium, the rich province of Sicily, was targeted in 1025 by Basil II, who died before the expedition could be completed. Nevertheless, by that time the Empire stretched from the straits of Messina to the Euphrates and from the Danube to Syria.[92] Wars against the Bulgarian Empire[edit] Further information: Byzantine–Bulgarian wars Emperor Basil II (r. 976–1025) The extent of the Empire under Basil II The traditional struggle with the See of Rome continued through the Macedonian period, spurred by the question of religious supremacy over the newly Christianised state of Bulgaria.[83] Ending eighty years of peace between the two states, the powerful Bulgarian tsar Simeon I invaded in 894 but was pushed back by the Byzantines, who used their fleet to sail up the Black Sea to attack the Bulgarian rear, enlisting the support of the Hungarians.[93] The Byzantines were defeated at the Battle of Boulgarophygon in 896, however, and agreed to pay annual subsidies to the Bulgarians.[87] Leo the Wise died in 912, and hostilities soon resumed as Simeon marched to Constantinople at the head of a large army.[94] Although the walls of the city were impregnable, the Byzantine administration was in disarray and Simeon was invited into the city, where he was granted the crown of basileus (emperor) of Bulgaria and had the young emperor Constantine VII marry one of his daughters. When a revolt in Constantinople halted his dynastic project, he again invaded Thrace and conquered Adrianople.[95] The Empire now faced the problem of a powerful Christian state within a few days' marching distance from Constantinople,[83] as well as having to fight on two fronts.[87] A great imperial expedition under Leo Phocas and Romanos I Lekapenos ended with another crushing Byzantine defeat at the Battle of Achelous in 917, and the following year the Bulgarians were free to ravage northern Greece. Adrianople was plundered again in 923, and a Bulgarian army laid siege to Constantinople in 924. Simeon died suddenly in 927, however, and Bulgarian power collapsed with him. Bulgaria and Byzantium entered a long period of peaceful relations, and the Empire was now free to concentrate on the eastern front against the Muslims.[96] In 968, Bulgaria was overrun by the Rus' under Sviatoslav I of Kiev, but three years later, John I Tzimiskes defeated the Rus' and re-incorporated Eastern Bulgaria into the Byzantine Empire.[97] Bulgarian resistance revived under the rule of the Cometopuli dynasty, but the new Emperor Basil II (r. 976–1025) made the submission of the Bulgarians his primary goal.[98] Basil's first expedition against Bulgaria, however, resulted in a defeat at the Gates of Trajan. For the next few years, the emperor would be preoccupied with internal revolts in Anatolia, while the Bulgarians expanded their realm in the Balkans. The war dragged on for nearly twenty years. The Byzantine victories of Spercheios and Skopje decisively weakened the Bulgarian army, and in annual campaigns, Basil methodically reduced the Bulgarian strongholds.[98] At the Battle of Kleidion in 1014 the Bulgarians were annihilated: their army was captured, and it is said that 99 out of every 100 men were blinded, with the hundredth man left with one eye so he could lead his compatriots home. When Tsar Samuil saw the broken remains of his once formidable army, he died of shock. By 1018, the last Bulgarian strongholds had surrendered, and the country became part of the Empire.[98] This victory restored the Danube frontier, which had not been held since the days of the Emperor Heraclius.[92] Relations with the Kievan Rus'[edit] Rus' under the walls of Constantinople (860) Varangian Guardsmen, an illumination from the Skylitzis Chronicle Between 850 and 1100, the Empire developed a mixed relationship with the new state of the Kievan Rus', which had emerged to the north across the Black Sea.[99] This relationship would have long-lasting repercussions in the history of the East Slavs, and the Empire quickly became the main trading and cultural partner for Kiev. The Rus' launched their first attack against Constantinople in 860, pillaging the suburbs of the city. In 941, they appeared on the Asian shore of the Bosphorus, but this time they were crushed, an indication of the improvements in the Byzantine military position after 907, when only diplomacy had been able to push back the invaders. Basil II could not ignore the emerging power of the Rus', and, following the example of his predecessors, he used religion as a means for the achievement of political purposes.[100] Rus'–Byzantine relations became closer following the marriage of Anna Porphyrogeneta to Vladimir the Great in 988, and the subsequent Christianisation of the Rus'.[99] Byzantine priests, architects, and artists were invited to work on numerous cathedrals and churches around Rus', expanding Byzantine cultural influence even further, while numerous Rus' served in the Byzantine army as mercenaries, most notably as the famous Varangian Guard.[99] Even after the Christianisation of the Rus', however, relations were not always friendly. The most serious conflict between the two powers was the war of 968–971 in Bulgaria, but several Rus' raiding expeditions against the Byzantine cities of the Black Sea coast and Constantinople itself are also recorded. Although most were repulsed, they were often followed by treaties that were generally favourable to the Rus', such as the one concluded at the end of the war of 1043, during which the Rus' gave an indication of their ambitions to compete with the Byzantines as an independent power.[100] Campaigns in the Caucasus[edit] Main article: Byzantine–Georgian wars Between 1021 and 1022, following years of tensions, Basil II led a series of victorious campaigns against the Kingdom of Georgia, resulting in the annexation of several Georgian provinces to the Empire. Basil's successors also annexed Bagratid Armenia in 1045. Importantly, both Georgia and Armenia were significantly weakened by the Byzantine administration's policy of heavy taxation and abolishing of the levy. The weakening of Georgia and Armenia would play a significant role in the Byzantine defeat at Manzikert in 1071.[101] Apex[edit] Constantinople was the largest and wealthiest city in Europe throughout late antiquity and most of the Middle Ages until the Fourth Crusade in 1204. Basil II is considered among the most capable Byzantine emperors and his reign as the apex of the empire in the Middle Ages. By 1025, the date of Basil II's death, the Byzantine Empire stretched from Armenia in the east to Calabria in Southern Italy in the west.[92] Many successes had been achieved, ranging from the conquest of Bulgaria to the annexation of parts of Georgia and Armenia, and the reconquest of Crete, Cyprus, and the important city of Antioch. These were not temporary tactical gains but long-term reconquests.[85] Leo VI achieved the complete codification of Byzantine law in Greek. This monumental work of 60 volumes became the foundation of all subsequent Byzantine law and is still studied today.[102] Leo also reformed the administration of the Empire, redrawing the borders of the administrative subdivisions (the Themata, or "Themes") and tidying up the system of ranks and privileges, as well as regulating the behaviour of the various trade guilds in Constantinople. Leo's reform did much to reduce the previous fragmentation of the Empire, which henceforth had one center of power, Constantinople.[103] However, the increasing military success of the Empire greatly enriched and empowered the provincial nobility with respect to the peasantry, who were essentially reduced to a state of serfdom.[104] Under the Macedonian emperors, the city of Constantinople flourished, becoming the largest and wealthiest city in Europe, with a population of approximately 400,000 in the 9th and 10th centuries.[105] During this period, the Byzantine Empire employed a strong civil service staffed by competent aristocrats that oversaw the collection of taxes, domestic administration, and foreign policy. The Macedonian emperors also increased the Empire's wealth by fostering trade with Western Europe, particularly through the sale of silk and metalwork.[106] Split between Orthodoxy and Catholicism (1054)[edit] Further information: East–West Schism Mural of Saints Cyril and Methodius, 19th century, Troyan Monastery, Bulgaria The Macedonian period also included events of momentous religious significance. The conversion of the Bulgarians, Serbs and Rus' to Orthodox Christianity drew the religious map of Europe which still resonates today. Cyril and Methodius, two Byzantine Greek brothers from Thessaloniki, contributed significantly to the Christianization of the Slavs and in the process devised the Glagolitic alphabet, ancestor to the Cyrillic script.[107] In 1054, relations between the Eastern and Western traditions of the Chalcedonian Christian Church reached a terminal crisis, known as the East–West Schism. Although there was a formal declaration of institutional separation, on 16 July, when three papal legates entered the Hagia Sophia during Divine Liturgy on a Saturday afternoon and placed a bull of excommunication on the altar,[108] the so-called Great Schism was actually the culmination of centuries of gradual separation.[109] Crisis and fragmentation[edit] The Byzantine Empire soon fell into a period of difficulties, caused to a large extent by the undermining of the theme system and the neglect of the military. Nikephoros II, John Tzimiskes, and Basil II shifted the emphasis of the military divisions (τάγματα, tagmata) from a reactive, defence-oriented citizen army into an army of professional career soldiers, increasingly dependent on foreign mercenaries. Mercenaries were expensive, however, and as the threat of invasion receded in the 10th century, so did the need for maintaining large garrisons and expensive fortifications.[110] Basil II left a burgeoning treasury upon his death, but he neglected to plan for his succession. None of his immediate successors had any particular military or political talent and the imperial administration increasingly fell into the hands of the civil service. Incompetent efforts to revive the Byzantine economy resulted in severe inflation and a debased gold currency. The army was now seen as both an unnecessary expense and a political threat. A number of standing local units were demobilised, further augmenting the army's dependence on mercenaries, who could be retained and dismissed on an as-needed basis.[111] The seizure of Edessa (1031) by the Byzantines under George Maniakes and the counterattack by the Seljuk Turks At the same time, Byzantium was faced with new enemies. Its provinces in southern Italy were threatened by the Normans, who arrived in Italy at the beginning of the 11th century. During a period of strife between Constantinople and Rome culminating in the East-West Schism of 1054, the Normans began to advance, slowly but steadily, into Byzantine Italy.[112] Reggio, the capital of the tagma of Calabria, was captured in 1060 by Robert Guiscard, followed by Otranto in 1068. Bari, the main Byzantine stronghold in Apulia, was besieged in August 1068 and fell in April 1071.[113] About 1053, Constantine IX disbanded what the historian John Skylitzes calls the "Iberian Army", which consisted of 50,000 men and it was turned into a contemporary Drungary of the Watch. Two other knowledgeable contemporaries, the former officials Michael Attaleiates and Kekaumenos, agree with Skylitzes that by demobilising these soldiers Constantine did catastrophic harm to the Empire's eastern defences. The emergency lent weight to the military aristocracy in Anatolia, who in 1068 secured the election of one of their own, Romanos Diogenes, as emperor. In the summer of 1071, Romanos undertook a massive eastern campaign to draw the Seljuks into a general engagement with the Byzantine army. At the Battle of Manzikert, Romanos suffered a surprise defeat by Sultan Alp Arslan, and he was captured. Alp Arslan treated him with respect and imposed no harsh terms on the Byzantines.[111] In Constantinople, however, a coup put in power Michael Doukas, who soon faced the opposition of Nikephoros Bryennios and Nikephoros Botaneiates. By 1081, the Seljuks had expanded their rule over virtually the entire Anatolian plateau from Armenia in the east to Bithynia in the west, and they had founded their capital at Nicaea, just 90 kilometres (56 miles) from Constantinople.[114] Komnenian dynasty and the Crusades[edit] See also: Byzantine Empire under the Komnenos dynasty and Komnenian restoration Alexios I, founder of the Komnenos dynasty During the Komnenian, or Comnenian, period from about 1081 to about 1185, the five emperors of the Komnenos dynasty (Alexios I, John II, Manuel I, Alexios II, and Andronikos I) presided over a sustained, though ultimately incomplete, restoration of the military, territorial, economic, and political position of the Byzantine Empire.[115] Although the Seljuk Turks occupied the heartland of the Empire in Anatolia, most Byzantine military efforts during this period were directed against Western powers, particularly the Normans.[115] The Empire under the Komnenoi played a key role in the history of the Crusades in the Holy Land, which Alexios I had helped bring about, while also exerting enormous cultural and political influence in Europe, the Near East, and the lands around the Mediterranean Sea under John and Manuel. Contact between Byzantium and the "Latin" West, including the Crusader states, increased significantly during the Komnenian period. Venetian and other Italian traders became resident in large numbers in Constantinople and the empire (there were an estimated 60,000 Latins in Constantinople alone, out of a population of three to four hundred thousand), and their presence together with the numerous Latin mercenaries who were employed by Manuel helped to spread Byzantine technology, art, literature and culture throughout the Latin West, while also leading to a flow of Western ideas and customs into the Empire.[116] In terms of prosperity and cultural life, the Komnenian period was one of the peaks in Byzantine history,[117] and Constantinople remained the leading city of the Christian world in size, wealth, and culture.[118] There was a renewed interest in classical Greek philosophy, as well as an increase in literary output in vernacular Greek.[119] Byzantine art and literature held a pre-eminent place in Europe, and the cultural impact of Byzantine art on the west during this period was enormous and of long lasting significance.[120] Alexios I and the First Crusade[edit] Further information: Alexios I Komnenos See also: First Crusade The Chora Church, dating from the Komnenian period, has some of the finest Byzantine frescoes and mosaics. After Manzikert, a partial recovery (referred to as the Komnenian restoration) was made possible by the Komnenian dynasty.[121] The Komnenoi attained power again under Alexios I in 1081. From the outset of his reign, Alexios faced a formidable attack by the Normans under Robert Guiscard and his son Bohemund of Taranto, who captured Dyrrhachium and Corfu, and laid siege to Larissa in Thessaly. Robert Guiscard's death in 1085 temporarily eased the Norman problem. The following year, the Seljuq sultan died, and the sultanate was split by internal rivalries. By his own efforts, Alexios defeated the Pechenegs; they were caught by surprise and annihilated at the Battle of Levounion on 28 April 1091.[122] The Byzantine Empire and the Seljuk Sultanate of Rûm before the First Crusade (1095–1099) Having achieved stability in the West, Alexios could turn his attention to the severe economic difficulties and the disintegration of the Empire's traditional defences.[123] However, he still did not have enough manpower to recover the lost territories in Asia Minor and to advance against the Seljuks. At the Council of Piacenza in 1095, envoys from Alexios spoke to Pope Urban II about the suffering of the Christians of the East, and underscored that without help from the West they would continue to suffer under Muslim rule.[124] Urban saw Alexios's request as a dual opportunity to cement Western Europe and reunite the Eastern Orthodox Church with the Roman Catholic Church under his rule.[124] On 27 November 1095, Pope Urban II called together the Council of Clermont, and urged all those present to take up arms under the sign of the Cross and launch an armed pilgrimage to recover Jerusalem and the East from the Muslims. The response in Western Europe was overwhelming.[122] Alexios had anticipated help in the form of mercenary forces from the West, but he was totally unprepared for the immense and undisciplined force that soon arrived in Byzantine territory. It was no comfort to Alexios to learn that four of the eight leaders of the main body of the Crusade were Normans, among them Bohemund. Since the crusade had to pass through Constantinople, however, the Emperor had some control over it. He required its leaders to swear to restore to the empire any towns or territories they might reconquer from the Turks on their way to the Holy Land. In return, he gave them guides and a military escort.[125] Alexios was able to recover a number of important cities and islands, and in fact much of western Asia Minor. The Crusaders agreed to become Alexios' vassals under the Treaty of Devol in 1108, which marked the end of the Norman threat during Alexios' reign.[126] John II, Manuel I and the Second Crusade[edit] Main articles: John II Komnenos and Manuel I Komnenos A mosaic from the Hagia Sophia of Constantinople (modern Istanbul), depicting Mary and Jesus, flanked by John II Komnenos (left) and his wife Irene of Hungary (right), 12th century Byzantine Empire in orange, c. 1180, at the end of the Komnenian period Alexios's son John II Komnenos succeeded him in 1118 and ruled until 1143. John was a pious and dedicated Emperor who was determined to undo the damage to the empire suffered at the Battle of Manzikert, half a century earlier.[127] Famed for his piety and his remarkably mild and just reign, John was an exceptional example of a moral ruler at a time when cruelty was the norm.[128] For this reason, he has been called the Byzantine Marcus Aurelius. During his twenty-five-year reign, John made alliances with the Holy Roman Empire in the West and decisively defeated the Pechenegs at the Battle of Beroia.[129] He thwarted Hungarian and Serbian threats during the 1120s, and in 1130 he allied himself with the German emperor Lothair III against the Norman king Roger II of Sicily.[130] In the later part of his reign, John focused his activities on the East, personally leading numerous campaigns against the Turks in Asia Minor. His campaigns fundamentally altered the balance of power in the East, forcing the Turks onto the defensive, while restoring many towns, fortresses, and cities across the peninsula to the Byzantines. He defeated the Danishmend Emirate of Melitene and reconquered all of Cilicia, while forcing Raymond of Poitiers, Prince of Antioch, to recognise Byzantine suzerainty. In an effort to demonstrate the Emperor's role as the leader of the Christian world, John marched into the Holy Land at the head of the combined forces of the Empire and the Crusader states; yet despite his great vigour pressing the campaign, his hopes were disappointed by the treachery of his Crusader allies.[131] In 1142, John returned to press his claims to Antioch, but he died in the spring of 1143 following a hunting accident. John's chosen heir was his fourth son, Manuel I Komnenos, who campaigned aggressively against his neighbours both in the west and in the east. In Palestine, Manuel allied with the Crusader Kingdom of Jerusalem and sent a large fleet to participate in a combined invasion of Fatimid Egypt. Manuel reinforced his position as overlord of the Crusader states, with his hegemony over Antioch and Jerusalem secured by agreement with Raynald, Prince of Antioch, and Amalric, King of Jerusalem.[132] In an effort to restore Byzantine control over the ports of southern Italy, he sent an expedition to Italy in 1155, but disputes within the coalition led to the eventual failure of the campaign. Despite this military setback, Manuel's armies successfully invaded the Southern parts of the Kingdom of Hungary in 1167, defeating the Hungarians at the Battle of Sirmium. By 1168, nearly the whole of the eastern Adriatic coast lay in Manuel's hands.[133] Manuel made several alliances with the Pope and Western Christian kingdoms, and he successfully handled the passage of the Second Crusade through his empire.[134] In the east, however, Manuel suffered a major defeat in 1176 at the Battle of Myriokephalon, against the Turks. Yet the losses were quickly recovered, and in the following year Manuel's forces inflicted a defeat upon a force of "picked Turks".[135] The Byzantine commander John Vatatzes, who destroyed the Turkish invaders at the Battle of Hyelion and Leimocheir, not only brought troops from the capital but also was able to gather an army along the way, a sign that the Byzantine army remained strong and that the defensive program of western Asia Minor was still successful.[136] 12th-century Renaissance[edit] Further information: Byzantine civilisation in the 12th century See also: Komnenian Byzantine army The Lamentation of Christ (1164), a fresco from the church of Saint Panteleimon in Nerezi, North Macedonia, considered a superb example of 12th-century Komnenian art John and Manuel pursued active military policies, and both deployed considerable resources on sieges and on city defences; aggressive fortification policies were at the heart of their imperial military policies.[137] Despite the defeat at Myriokephalon, the policies of Alexios, John and Manuel resulted in vast territorial gains, increased frontier stability in Asia Minor, and secured the stabilisation of the Empire's European frontiers. From c. 1081 to c. 1180, the Komnenian army assured the Empire's security, enabling Byzantine civilisation to flourish.[138] This allowed the Western provinces to achieve an economic revival that continued until the close of the century. It has been argued that Byzantium under the Komnenian rule was more prosperous than at any time since the Persian invasions of the 7th century. During the 12th century, population levels rose and extensive tracts of new agricultural land were brought into production. Archaeological evidence from both Europe and Asia Minor shows a considerable increase in the size of urban settlements, together with a notable upsurge in new towns. Trade was also flourishing; the Venetians, the Genoese and others opened up the ports of the Aegean to commerce, shipping goods from the Crusader kingdoms of Outremer and Fatimid Egypt to the west and trading with the Empire via Constantinople.[139] In artistic terms, there was a revival in mosaic, and regional schools of architecture began producing many distinctive styles that drew on a range of cultural influences.[140] During the 12th century, the Byzantines provided their model of early humanism as a renaissance of interest in classical authors. In Eustathius of Thessalonica, Byzantine humanism found its most characteristic expression.[141] In philosophy, there was resurgence of classical learning not seen since the 7th century, characterised by a significant increase in the publication of commentaries on classical works.[119] In addition, the first transmission of classical Greek knowledge to the West occurred during the Komnenian period.[120] Decline and disintegration[edit] Main article: Decline of the Byzantine Empire Angelid dynasty[edit] Main article: Byzantine Empire under the Angelos dynasty Byzantium in the late Angeloi period Manuel's death on 24 September 1180 left his 11-year-old son Alexios II Komnenos on the throne. Alexios was highly incompetent in the office, and with his mother Maria of Antioch's Frankish background, made his regency unpopular.[142] Eventually, Andronikos I Komnenos, a grandson of Alexios I, launched a revolt against his younger relative and managed to overthrow him in a violent coup d'état.[143] Utilizing his good looks and his immense popularity with the army, he marched on to Constantinople in August 1182 and incited a massacre of the Latins.[143] After eliminating his potential rivals, he had himself crowned as co-emperor in September 1183. He eliminated Alexios II, and took his 12-year-old wife Agnes of France for himself.[143] Andronikos began his reign well; in particular, the measures he took to reform the government of the Empire have been praised by historians. According to George Ostrogorsky, Andronikos was determined to root out corruption: Under his rule, the sale of offices ceased; selection was based on merit, rather than favouritism; officials were paid an adequate salary so as to reduce the temptation of bribery. In the provinces, Andronikos's reforms produced a speedy and marked improvement.[144] The aristocrats were infuriated against him, and to make matters worse, Andronikos seems to have become increasingly unbalanced; executions and violence became increasingly common, and his reign turned into a reign of terror.[145] Andronikos seemed almost to seek the extermination of the aristocracy as a whole. The struggle against the aristocracy turned into wholesale slaughter, while the Emperor resorted to ever more ruthless measures to shore up his regime.[144] Despite his military background, Andronikos failed to deal with Isaac Komnenos, Béla III of Hungary (r. 1172–1196) who reincorporated Croatian territories into Hungary, and Stephen Nemanja of Serbia (r. 1166–1196) who declared his independence from the Byzantine Empire. Yet, none of these troubles would compare to William II of Sicily's (r. 1166–1189) invasion force of 300 ships and 80,000 men, arriving in 1185.[146] Andronikos mobilised a small fleet of 100 ships to defend the capital, but other than that he was indifferent to the populace. He was finally overthrown when Isaac Angelos, surviving an imperial assassination attempt, seized power with the aid of the people and had Andronikos killed.[147] The reign of Isaac II, and more so that of his brother Alexios III, saw the collapse of what remained of the centralised machinery of Byzantine government and defence. Although the Normans were driven out of Greece, in 1186 the Vlachs and Bulgars began a rebellion that led to the formation of the Second Bulgarian Empire. The internal policy of the Angeloi was characterised by the squandering of the public treasure and fiscal maladministration. Imperial authority was severely weakened, and the growing power vacuum at the center of the Empire encouraged fragmentation. There is evidence that some Komnenian heirs had set up a semi-independent state in Trebizond before 1204.[148] According to Alexander Vasiliev, "the dynasty of the Angeloi, Greek in its origin, ... accelerated the ruin of the Empire, already weakened without and disunited within."[149] Fourth Crusade[edit] Further information: Fourth Crusade The Entry of the Crusaders into Constantinople, by Eugène Delacroix (1840) In 1198, Pope Innocent III broached the subject of a new crusade through legates and encyclical letters.[150] The stated intent of the crusade was to conquer Egypt, now the centre of Muslim power in the Levant. The crusader army that arrived at Venice in the summer of 1202 and hired the Venetian fleet to transport them to Egypt. As payment to the Venetians, they captured the (Christian) port of Zara in Dalmatia (vassal city of Venice, which had rebelled and placed itself under Hungary's protection in 1186).[151] Shortly afterwards, Alexios Angelos, son of the deposed and blinded Emperor Isaac II Angelos, made contacts with the crusaders. Alexios offered to reunite the Byzantine church with Rome, pay the crusaders 200,000 silver marks, join the crusade, and provide all the supplies they needed to reach Egypt.[152] Crusader sack of Constantinople (1204)[edit] Further information: Siege of Constantinople (1203) and Siege of Constantinople (1204) The partition of the empire following the Fourth Crusade, c. 1204 The crusaders arrived at Constantinople in the summer of 1203 and quickly attacked, starting a major fire that damaged large parts of the city, and briefly seized control. Alexios III fled from the capital and Alexios Angelos was elevated to the throne as Alexios IV along with his blind father Isaac. Alexios IV and Isaac II were unable to keep their promises and were deposed by Alexios V. The crusaders again took the city on 13 April 1204 and Constantinople was subjected to pillage and massacre by the rank and file for three days. Many priceless icons, relics and other objects later turned up in Western Europe, a large number in Venice. According to Choniates, a prostitute was even set up on the Patriarchal throne.[153] When order had been restored, the crusaders and the Venetians proceeded to implement their agreement; Baldwin of Flanders was elected Emperor of a new Latin Empire and the Venetian Thomas Morosini was chosen as Patriarch. The lands divided up among the leaders included most of the former Byzantine possessions, though resistance would continue through the Byzantine remnants of Nicaea, Trebizond, and Epirus.[154] Although Venice was more interested in commerce than conquering territory, it took key areas of Constantinople and the Doge took the title of "Lord of a Quarter and Half a Quarter of the Roman Empire".[155] Fall[edit] Empire in exile[edit] Further information: Frankokratia After the sack of Constantinople in 1204 by Latin crusaders, two Byzantine successor states were established: the Empire of Nicaea, and the Despotate of Epirus. A third, the Empire of Trebizond, was created after Alexios Komnenos, commanding the Georgian expedition in Chaldia[156] a few weeks before the sack of Constantinople, found himself de facto emperor, and established himself in Trebizond. Of the three successor states, Epirus and Nicaea stood the best chance of reclaiming Constantinople. The Nicaean Empire struggled to survive the next few decades, however, and by the mid-13th century it had lost much of southern Anatolia.[157] The weakening of the Sultanate of Rûm following the Mongol invasion in 1242–43 allowed many beyliks and ghazis to set up their own principalities in Anatolia, weakening the Byzantine hold on Asia Minor.[158] In time, one of the Beys, Osman I, created an empire that would eventually conquer Constantinople. However, the Mongol invasion also gave Nicaea a temporary respite from Seljuk attacks, allowing it to concentrate on the Latin Empire to its north. Reconquest of Constantinople[edit] Main article: Byzantine Empire under the Palaiologos dynasty The Byzantine Empire, c. 1263 The Empire of Nicaea, founded by the Laskarid dynasty, managed to effect the Recapture of Constantinople from the Latins in 1261 and defeat Epirus. This led to a short-lived revival of Byzantine fortunes under Michael VIII Palaiologos but the war-ravaged Empire was ill-equipped to deal with the enemies that surrounded it. To maintain his campaigns against the Latins, Michael pulled troops from Asia Minor and levied crippling taxes on the peasantry, causing much resentment.[159] Massive construction projects were completed in Constantinople to repair the damage of the Fourth Crusade but none of these initiatives was of any comfort to the farmers in Asia Minor suffering raids from Muslim ghazis.[160] Rather than holding on to his possessions in Asia Minor, Michael chose to expand the Empire, gaining only short-term success. To avoid another sacking of the capital by the Latins, he forced the Church to submit to Rome, again a temporary solution for which the peasantry hated Michael and Constantinople.[160] The efforts of Andronikos II and later his grandson Andronikos III marked Byzantium's last genuine attempts in restoring the glory of the Empire. However, the use of mercenaries by Andronikos II would often backfire, with the Catalan Company ravaging the countryside and increasing resentment towards Constantinople.[161] Rise of the Ottomans and fall of Constantinople[edit] Main articles: Byzantine–Ottoman Wars and Fall of Constantinople The Siege of Constantinople in 1453, depicted in a 15th-century French miniature The situation became worse for Byzantium during the civil wars after Andronikos III died. A six-year-long civil war devastated the empire, allowing the Serbian ruler Stefan Dušan (r. 1331–1346) to overrun most of the Empire's remaining territory and establish a Serbian Empire. In 1354, an earthquake at Gallipoli devastated the fort, allowing the Ottomans (who were hired as mercenaries during the civil war by John VI Kantakouzenos) to establish themselves in Europe.[162] By the time the Byzantine civil wars had ended, the Ottomans had defeated the Serbians and subjugated them as vassals. Following the Battle of Kosovo, much of the Balkans became dominated by the Ottomans.[163] The Byzantine emperors appealed to the West for help, but the Pope would only consider sending aid in return for a reunion of the Eastern Orthodox Church with the See of Rome. Church unity was considered, and occasionally accomplished by imperial decree, but the Orthodox citizenry and clergy intensely resented the authority of Rome and the Latin Rite.[164] Some Western troops arrived to bolster the Christian defence of Constantinople, but most Western rulers, distracted by their own affairs, did nothing as the Ottomans picked apart the remaining Byzantine territories.[165] Constantinople by this stage was underpopulated and dilapidated. The population of the city had collapsed so severely that it was now little more than a cluster of villages separated by fields. On 2 April 1453, Sultan Mehmed's army of 80,000 men and large numbers of irregulars laid siege to the city.[166] Despite a desperate last-ditch defence of the city by the massively outnumbered Christian forces (c. 7,000 men, 2,000 of whom were foreign),[165] Constantinople finally fell to the Ottomans after a two-month siege on 29 May 1453. The last Byzantine emperor, Constantine XI Palaiologos, was last seen casting off his imperial regalia and throwing himself into hand-to-hand combat after the walls of the city were taken.[167] Political aftermath[edit] The Eastern Mediterranean just before the Fall of Constantinople Flag of the late Empire under the Palaiologoi, sporting the tetragrammic cross symbol of the Palaiologos dynasty By the time of the fall of Constantinople, the only remaining territory of the Byzantine Empire was the Despotate of the Morea (Peloponnese), which was ruled by brothers of the last Emperor, Thomas Palaiologos and Demetrios Palaiologos. The Despotate continued on as an independent state by paying an annual tribute to the Ottomans. Incompetent rule, failure to pay the annual tribute and a revolt against the Ottomans finally led to Mehmed II's invasion of Morea in May 1460.[168] A few holdouts remained for a time. The island of Monemvasia refused to surrender and it was first ruled for a short time by an Aragonese corsair. When the population drove him out they obtained the consent of Thomas to place themselves under the Pope's protection before the end of 1460. The Mani Peninsula, on the Morea's south end, resisted under a loose coalition of the local clans and then that area came under Venice's rule. The last holdout was Salmeniko, in the Morea's northwest. Graitzas Palaiologos was the military commander there, stationed at Salmeniko Castle. While the town eventually surrendered, Graitzas and his garrison and some town residents held out in the castle until July 1461, when they escaped and reached Venetian territory.[169] The Empire of Trebizond, which had split away from the Byzantine Empire just weeks before Constantinople was taken by the Crusaders in 1204, became the last remnant and last de facto successor state to the Byzantine Empire. Efforts by the Emperor David to recruit European powers for an anti-Ottoman crusade provoked war between the Ottomans and Trebizond in the summer of 1461. After a month-long siege, David surrendered the city of Trebizond on 14 August 1461. The Empire of Trebizond's Crimean principality, the Principality of Theodoro (part of the Perateia), lasted another 14 years, falling to the Ottomans in December 1475. A nephew of the last Emperor, Constantine XI, Andreas Palaiologos claimed to have inherited the title of Byzantine Emperor. He lived in the Morea until its fall in 1460, then escaped to Rome where he lived under the protection of the Papal States for the remainder of his life. Since the office of emperor had never been technically hereditary, Andreas' claim would have been without merit under Byzantine law. However, the Empire had vanished, and Western states generally followed the Roman-church-sanctioned principles of hereditary sovereignty. Seeking a life in the west, Andreas styled himself Imperator Constantinopolitanus ("Emperor of Constantinople"), and sold his succession rights to both Charles VIII of France and the Catholic Monarchs. Constantine XI died without producing an heir, and had Constantinople not fallen he might have been succeeded by the sons of his deceased elder brother, who were taken into the palace service of Mehmed II after the fall of Constantinople. The oldest boy, renamed Has Murad, became a personal favourite of Mehmed and served as Beylerbey (Governor-General) of the Balkans. The younger son, renamed Mesih Pasha, became Admiral of the Ottoman fleet and Sancak Beg (Governor) of the Province of Gallipoli. He eventually served twice as Grand Vizier under Mehmed's son, Bayezid II.[170] Mehmed II and his successors continued to consider themselves heirs to the Roman Empire until the demise of the Ottoman Empire in the early 20th century following World War 1. They considered that they had simply shifted its religious basis as Constantine had done before, and they continued to refer to their conquered Eastern Roman inhabitants (Orthodox Christians) as Rûm. Meanwhile, the Danubian Principalities (whose rulers also considered themselves the heirs of the Eastern Roman Emperors[171]) harboured Orthodox refugees, including some Byzantine nobles. At his death, the role of the emperor as a patron of Eastern Orthodoxy was claimed by Ivan III, Grand duke of Muscovy. He had married Andreas' sister, Sophia Palaiologina, whose grandson, Ivan IV, would become the first Tsar of Russia (tsar, or czar, meaning caesar, is a term traditionally applied by Slavs to the Byzantine Emperors). Their successors supported the idea that Moscow was the proper heir to Rome and Constantinople. The idea of the Russian Empire as the successive Third Rome was kept alive until its demise with the Russian Revolution.[172] Government and bureaucracy[edit] Main article: Byzantine bureaucracy The themes, c. 750 The themes, c. 950 In the Byzantine state, the emperor was the sole and absolute ruler, and his power was regarded as having divine origin.[173] The Senate had ceased to have real political and legislative authority but remained as an honorary council with titular members. By the end of the 8th century, a civil administration focused on the court was formed as part of a large-scale consolidation of power in the capital (the rise to pre-eminence of the position of sakellarios is related to this change).[174] The most important administrative reform, which probably started in the mid-7th century, was the creation of themes, where civil and military administration was exercised by one person, the strategos.[175] Despite the occasionally derogatory use of the terms "Byzantine" and "Byzantinism", the Byzantine bureaucracy had a distinct ability for reconstituting itself in accordance with the Empire's situation. The elaborate system of titulature and precedence gave the court prestige and influence. Officials were arranged in strict order around the emperor, and depended upon the imperial will for their ranks. There were also actual administrative jobs, but authority could be vested in individuals rather than offices.[176] In the 8th and 9th centuries, civil service constituted the clearest path to aristocratic status, but, starting in the 9th century, the civil aristocracy was rivalled by an aristocracy of nobility. According to some studies of Byzantine government, 11th-century politics were dominated by competition between the civil and the military aristocracy. During this period, Alexios I undertook important administrative reforms, including the creation of new courtly dignities and offices.[177] Diplomacy[edit] Main article: Byzantine diplomacy The embassy of John the Grammarian in 829, between the emperor Theophilos and the Abbasid caliph Al-Ma'mun After the fall of Rome, the key challenge to the Empire was to maintain a set of relations between itself and its neighbours. When these nations set about forging formal political institutions, they often modelled themselves on Constantinople. Byzantine diplomacy soon managed to draw its neighbours into a network of international and inter-state relations.[178] This network revolved around treaty making, and included the welcoming of the new ruler into the family of kings, and the assimilation of Byzantine social attitudes, values and institutions.[179] Whereas classical writers are fond of making ethical and legal distinctions between peace and war, Byzantines regarded diplomacy as a form of war by other means. For example, a Bulgarian threat could be countered by providing money to the Kievan Rus'.[180] Italian sketch of Emperor John VIII during his visit in Ferrara and Florence in 1438 Diplomacy in the era was understood to have an intelligence-gathering function on top of its pure political function. The Bureau of Barbarians in Constantinople handled matters of protocol and record keeping for any issues related to the "barbarians", and thus had, perhaps, a basic intelligence function itself.[181] John B. Bury believed that the office exercised supervision over all foreigners visiting Constantinople, and that they were under the supervision of the Logothetes tou dromou.[182] While on the surface a protocol office – its main duty was to ensure foreign envoys were properly cared for and received sufficient state funds for their maintenance, and it kept all the official translators – it probably had a security function as well.[183] Byzantines availed themselves of a number of diplomatic practices. For example, embassies to the capital would often stay on for years. A member of other royal houses would routinely be requested to stay on in Constantinople, not only as a potential hostage, but also as a useful pawn in case political conditions where he came from changed. Another key practice was to overwhelm visitors by sumptuous displays.[178] According to Dimitri Obolensky, the preservation of the ancient civilisation in Europe was due to the skill and resourcefulness of Byzantine diplomacy, which remains one of Byzantium's lasting contributions to the history of Europe.[184] Science, medicine and law[edit] See also: Byzantine science, Byzantine medicine, Byzantine law, and List of Byzantine inventions Interior of the Hagia Sophia, the patriarchal basilica in Constantinople designed 537 CE by Isidore of Miletus, the first compiler of Archimedes' various works. The influence of Archimedes' principles of solid geometry is evident. The writings of Classical antiquity were cultivated and extended in Byzantium. Therefore, Byzantine science was in every period closely connected with ancient philosophy, and metaphysics.[185] In the field of engineering Isidore of Miletus, the Greek mathematician and architect of the Hagia Sophia, produced the first compilation of Archimedes' works c. 530, and it is through this manuscript tradition, kept alive by the school of mathematics and engineering founded c. 850 during the "Byzantine Renaissance" by Leo the Mathematician, that such works are known today (see Archimedes Palimpsest).[186] Pendentive architecture, a specific spherical form in the upper corners to support a dome, is a Byzantine invention. Although the first experimentation was made in the 200s, it was in the 6th century in the Byzantine Empire that its potential was fully achieved.[187] A mechanical sundial device consisting of complex gears made by the Byzantines has been excavated which indicates that the Antikythera mechanism, a sort of analogue device used in astronomy and invented around the late second century BC, continued to be (re)active in the Byzantine period.[188][189][190] J. R. Partington writes that Constantinople was full of inventors and craftsmen. The "philosopher" Leo of Thessalonika made for the Emperor Theophilos (829–42) a golden tree, the branches of which carried artificial birds which flapped their wings and sang, a model lion which moved and roared, and a bejewelled clockwork lady who walked. These mechanical toys continued the tradition represented in the treatise of Heron of Alexandria (c. A.D. 125), which was well-known to the Byzantines.[191] Such mechanical devices reached a high level of sophistication and were made in order to impress visitors.[192] The frontispiece of the Vienna Dioscurides, which shows a set of seven famous physicians Leo the Mathematician has also been credited with the system of beacons, a sort of optical telegraph, stretching across Anatolia from Cilicia to Constantinople, which gave advance warning of enemy raids, and which was used as diplomatic communication as well. The Byzantines knew and used the concept of hydraulics: in the 900s the diplomat Liutprand of Cremona, when visiting the Byzantine emperor, explained that he saw the emperor sitting on a hydraulic throne and that it was "made in such a cunning manner that at one moment it was down on the ground, while at another it rose higher and was seen to be up in the air".[193] John Philoponus, an Alexandrian philologist, Aristotelian commentator and Christian theologian, author of a considerable number of philosophical treatises and theological works, was the first who questioned Aristotle's teaching of physics, despite its flaws. Unlike Aristotle, who based his physics on verbal argument, Philoponus relied on observation. In his Commentaries on Aristotle, Philoponus wrote: But this is completely erroneous, and our view may be corroborated by actual observation more effectively than by any sort of verbal argument. For if you let fall from the same height two weights of which one is many times as heavy as the other, you will see that the ratio of the times required for the motion does not depend on the ratio of the weights, but that the difference in time is a very small one. And so, if the difference in the weights is not considerable, that is, of one is, let us say, double the other, there will be no difference, or else an imperceptible difference, in time, though the difference in weight is by no means negligible, with one body weighing twice as much as the other.[194] Bas-relief plaque of Tribonian in the Chamber of the House of Representatives in the United States Capitol Many refugee Byzantine scholars fled to North Italy in the 1400s. Here John Argyropoulos (1415–1487), born in Constantinople and who ended his days in north Italy. John Philoponus' criticism of Aristotelian principles of physics was an inspiration for Galileo Galilei's refutation of Aristotelian physics during the Scientific Revolution many centuries later, as Galileo cited Philoponus substantially in his works.[195][196] The ship mill is a Byzantine invention, designed to mill grains using hydraulic power. The technology eventually spread to the rest of Europe and was in use until c. 1800.[197][198] In 438, the Codex Theodosianus, named after Theodosius II, codified Byzantine law. It went into force not just in the Eastern Roman/Byzantine Empire, but also in the Western Roman Empire. It not only summarised the laws, but also gave direction on interpretation. Under the reign of Justinian I it was Tribonian, a notable jurist, who supervised the revision of the legal code known today as Corpus Juris Civilis. In the field of law, Justinian I's reforms had a clear effect on the evolution of jurisprudence, with his Corpus Juris Civilis becoming the basis for revived Roman law in the Western world, while Leo III's Ecloga influenced the formation of legal institutions in the Slavic world.[199] In the 10th century, Leo VI the Wise achieved the complete codification of the whole of Byzantine law in Greek with the Basilika, which became the foundation of all subsequent Byzantine law with an influence extending through to modern Balkan legal codes.[102] The Byzantines pioneered the concept of the hospital as an institution offering medical care and possibility of a cure for the patients, as a reflection of the ideals of Christian charity, rather than merely a place to die.[200] Ceramic grenades that were filled with Greek fire, surrounded by caltrops, 10th–12th century, National Historical Museum, Athens, Greece Although the concept of uroscopy was known to Galen, he did not see the importance of using it to diagnose disease. It was Byzantine physicians, such as Theophilus Protospatharius, who realised the diagnostic potential of uroscopy in a time when no microscope or stethoscope existed. That practice eventually spread to the rest of Europe.[201] In medicine the works of Byzantine doctors, such as the Vienna Dioscorides (6th century), and works of Paul of Aegina (7th century) and Nicholas Myrepsos (late 13th century), continued to be used as the authoritative texts by Europeans through the Renaissance. The latter one invented the Aurea Alexandrina which was a kind of opiate or antidote. The first known example of separating conjoined twins happened in the Byzantine Empire in the 10th century when a pair of conjoined twins from Armenia came to Constantinople. Many years later one of them died, so the surgeons in Constantinople decided to remove the body of the dead one. The result was partly successful, as the surviving twin lived three days before dying, a result so impressive that it was mentioned a century and half later by historians. The next case of separating conjoined twins would not occur until 1689 in Germany.[202][203] Greek fire, an incendiary weapon which could even burn on water is also attributed to the Byzantines. It played a crucial role in the Empire's victory over the Umayyad Caliphate during the Siege of Constantinople (717–718).[204] The discovery is attributed to Callinicus of Heliopolis from Syria who fled during the Arab conquest of Syria. However, it has also been argued that no single person invented Greek fire, but rather, that it was "invented by the chemists in Constantinople who had inherited the discoveries of the Alexandrian chemical school...".[191] The first example of a grenade also appeared in Byzantine Empire, consisting of ceramic jars holding glass and nails, and filled with the explosive component of Greek Fire. It was used on battlefields.[205][206][207] The first examples of hand-held flamethrower also occurred in the Byzantine Empire in the 10th century, where infantry units were equipped with hand pumps and swivel tubes used to project the flame.[208] The counterweight trebuchet was invented in the Byzantine Empire during the reign of Alexios I Komnenos (1081–1118) under the Komnenian restoration when the Byzantines used this new-developed siege weaponry to devastate citadels and fortifications. This siege artillery marked the apogee of siege weaponry prior to the use of the cannon. From the Byzantines the armies of Europe and Asia eventually learned and adopted this siege weaponry.[209] In the final century of the Empire, astronomy and other mathematical sciences were taught in Trebizond; medicine attracted the interest of almost all scholars.[210] The Fall of Constantinople in 1453 fuelled the era later commonly known as the "Italian Renaissance". During this period, refugee Byzantine scholars were principally responsible for carrying, in person and in writing, ancient Greek grammatical, literary studies, mathematical, and astronomical knowledge to early Renaissance Italy.[211] They also brought with them classical learning and texts on botany, medicine and zoology, as well as the works of Dioscorides and John Philoponus' criticism of Aristotelian physics.[196] Culture[edit] Religion[edit] Main articles: State church of the Roman Empire and Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople As a symbol and expression of the universal prestige of the Patriarchate of Constantinople, Justinian built the Church of the Holy Wisdom of God, Hagia Sophia, which was completed in the short period of four and a half years (532–537). Mosaic of Jesus in Pammakaristos Church, Istanbul Triumphal arch mosaics of Jesus Christ and the Apostles. In Basilica of San Vitale in Ravenna, Italy. The Byzantine Empire was a theocracy, said to be ruled by God working through the Emperor. Jennifer Fretland VanVoorst argues, "The Byzantine Empire became a theocracy in the sense that Christian values and ideals were the foundation of the empire's political ideals and heavily entwined with its political goals."[212] Steven Runciman says in his book on The Byzantine Theocracy (2004): The constitution of the Byzantine Empire was based on the conviction that it was the earthly copy of the Kingdom of Heaven. Just as God ruled in Heaven, so the Emperor, made in his image, should rule on earth and carry out his commandments ... It saw itself as a universal empire. Ideally, it should embrace all the peoples of the Earth who, ideally, should all be members of the one true Christian Church, its own Orthodox Church. Just as man was made in God's image, so man's kingdom on Earth was made in the image of the Kingdom of Heaven.[213] The survival of the Empire in the East assured an active role of the Emperor in the affairs of the Church. The Byzantine state inherited from pagan times the administrative, and financial routine of administering religious affairs, and this routine was applied to the Christian Church. Following the pattern set by Eusebius of Caesarea, the Byzantines viewed the Emperor as a representative or messenger of Christ, responsible particularly for the propagation of Christianity among pagans, and for the "externals" of the religion, such as administration and finances. As Cyril Mango points out, the Byzantine political thinking can be summarised in the motto "One God, one empire, one religion".[214] The imperial role in the affairs of the Church never developed into a fixed, legally defined system.[215] Additionally, due to the decline of Rome and internal dissension in the other Eastern Patriarchates, the Church of Constantinople became, between the 6th and 11th centuries, the richest and most influential center of Christendom.[216] Even when the Empire was reduced to only a shadow of its former self, the Church continued to exercise significant influence both inside and outside of the imperial frontiers. As George Ostrogorsky points out: The Patriarchate of Constantinople remained the center of the Orthodox world, with subordinate metropolitan sees and archbishoprics in the territory of Asia Minor and the Balkans, now lost to Byzantium, as well as in Caucasus, Russia and Lithuania. The Church remained the most stable element in the Byzantine Empire.[217] Byzantine monasticism especially came to be an "ever-present feature" of the empire, with monasteries becoming "powerful landowners and a voice to be listened to in imperial politics".[218] The official state Christian doctrine was determined by the first seven ecumenical councils, and it was then the emperor's duty to impose it on his subjects. An imperial decree of 388, which was later incorporated into the Codex Justinianeus, orders the population of the Empire "to assume the name of Catholic Christians", and regards all those who will not abide by the law as "mad and foolish persons"; as followers of "heretical dogmas".[219] Despite imperial decrees and the stringent stance of the state church itself, which came to be known as the Eastern Orthodox Church or Eastern Christianity, the latter never represented all Christians in Byzantium. Mango believes that, in the early stages of the Empire, the "mad and foolish persons", those labelled "heretics" by the state church, were the majority of the population.[220] Besides the pagans, who existed until the end of the 6th century, and the Jews, there were many followers – sometimes even emperors – of various Christian doctrines, such as Nestorianism, Monophysitism, Arianism, and Paulicianism, whose teachings were in some opposition to the main theological doctrine, as determined by the Ecumenical Councils.[221] Another division among Christians occurred, when Leo III ordered the destruction of icons throughout the Empire. This led to a significant religious crisis, which ended in the mid-9th century with the restoration of icons. During the same period, a new wave of pagans emerged in the Balkans, originating mainly from Slavic people. These were gradually Christianised, and by Byzantium's late stages, Eastern Orthodoxy represented most Christians and, in general, most people in what remained of the Empire.[222] Jews were a significant minority in the Byzantine state throughout its history, and, according to Roman law, they constituted a legally recognised religious group. In the early Byzantine period they were generally tolerated, but then periods of tensions and persecutions ensued. In any case, after the Arab conquests, the majority of Jews found themselves outside the Empire; those left inside the Byzantine borders apparently lived in relative peace from the 10th century onwards.[223] Arts[edit] Art and literature[edit] Main articles: Byzantine art and Byzantine literature See also: Byzantine dress Miniatures of the 6th-century Rabula Gospel display the more abstract and symbolic nature of Byzantine art. Surviving Byzantine art is mostly religious and with exceptions at certain periods is highly conventionalised, following traditional models that translate carefully controlled church theology into artistic terms. Painting in fresco, illuminated manuscripts and on wood panel and, especially in earlier periods, mosaic were the main media, and figurative sculpture very rare except for small carved ivories. Manuscript painting preserved to the end some of the classical realist tradition that was missing in larger works.[224] Byzantine art was highly prestigious and sought-after in Western Europe, where it maintained a continuous influence on medieval art until near the end of the period. This was especially so in Italy, where Byzantine styles persisted in modified form through the 12th century, and became formative influences on Italian Renaissance art. But few incoming influences affected Byzantine style. With the expansion of the Eastern Orthodox church, Byzantine forms and styles spread throughout the Orthodox world and beyond.[225] Influences from Byzantine architecture, particularly in religious buildings, can be found in diverse regions from Egypt and Arabia to Russia and Romania. In Byzantine literature, three different cultural elements are recognised: the Greek, the Christian, and the Oriental. Byzantine literature is often classified in five groups: historians and annalists, encyclopaedists (Patriarch Photios, Michael Psellus, and Michael Choniates are regarded as the greatest encyclopaedists of Byzantium) and essayists, and writers of secular poetry. The only genuine heroic epic of the Byzantines is the Digenis Acritas. The remaining two groups include the new literary species: ecclesiastical and theological literature, and popular poetry.[226] Of the approximately two to three thousand volumes of Byzantine literature that survive, only 330 consist of secular poetry, history, science and pseudo-science.[226] While the most flourishing period of the secular literature of Byzantium runs from the 9th to the 12th century, its religious literature (sermons, liturgical books and poetry, theology, devotional treatises, etc.) developed much earlier with Romanos the Melodist being its most prominent representative.[227] Music[edit] Main article: Byzantine music See also: List of Byzantine composers Late 4th century AD "Mosaic of the Musicians" with organ, aulos, and lyre from a Byzantine villa in Maryamin, Syria[228] The ecclesiastical forms of Byzantine music, composed to Greek texts as ceremonial, festival, or church music,[229] are, today, the most well-known forms. Ecclesiastical chants were a fundamental part of this genre. Greek and foreign historians agree that the ecclesiastical tones and in general the whole system of Byzantine music is closely related to the ancient Greek system.[230] It remains the oldest genre of extant music, of which the manner of performance and (with increasing accuracy from the 5th century onwards) the names of the composers, and sometimes the particulars of each musical work's circumstances, are known. Earliest known depiction of a bowed lyra, from a Byzantine ivory casket (900–1100 AD) (Museo Nazionale, Florence) The 9th century Persian geographer Ibn Khordadbeh (d. 911); in his lexicographical discussion of instruments cited the lyra (lūrā) as the typical instrument of the Byzantines along with the urghun (organ), shilyani (probably a type of harp or lyre) and the salandj (probably a bagpipe).[231] The first of these, the early bowed stringed instrument known as the Byzantine lyra, would come to be called the lira da braccio,[232] in Venice, where it is considered by many to have been the predecessor of the contemporary violin, which later flourished there.[233] The bowed "lyra" is still played in former Byzantine regions, where it is known as the Politiki lyra (lit. 'lyra of the City', i.e. Constantinople) in Greece, the Calabrian lira in Southern Italy, and the Lijerica in Dalmatia. The second instrument, the organ, originated in the Hellenistic world (see Hydraulis) and was used in the Hippodrome during races.[234][235] A pipe organ with "great leaden pipes" was sent by the emperor Constantine V to Pepin the Short, King of the Franks in 757. Pepin's son Charlemagne requested a similar organ for his chapel in Aachen in 812, beginning its establishment in Western church music.[235] The aulos was a double reeded woodwind like the modern oboe or Armenian duduk. Other forms include the plagiaulos (πλαγίαυλος, from πλάγιος "sideways"), which resembled the flute,[236] and the askaulos (ἀσκός askos – wine-skin), a bagpipe.[237] Bagpipes, also known as Dankiyo (from ancient Greek: angion (Τὸ ἀγγεῖον) "the container"), had been played even in Roman times and continued to be played throughout the empire's former realms through to the present. (See Balkan Gaida, Greek Tsampouna, Pontic Tulum, Cretan Askomandoura, Armenian Parkapzuk, and Romanian Cimpoi.) The modern descendant of the aulos is the Greek Zourna. Other instruments used in Byzantine Music were Kanonaki, Oud, Laouto, Santouri, Tambouras, Seistron (defi tambourine), Toubeleki and Daouli. Some claim that Lavta may have been invented by the Byzantines before the arrival of the Turks. Cuisine[edit] Main article: Byzantine cuisine Byzantine culture was initially the same as Late Greco-Roman, but over the following millennium of the empire's existence it slowly changed into something more similar to modern Balkan and Anatolian culture. The cuisine still relied heavily on the Greco-Roman fish-sauce condiment garos, but it also contained foods still familiar today, such as the cured meat pastirma (known as "paston" in Byzantine Greek),[238][239][240] baklava (known as koptoplakous κοπτοπλακοῦς),[241] tiropita (known as plakountas tetyromenous or tyritas plakountas),[242] and the famed medieval sweet wines (Commandaria and the eponymous Rumney wine). Retsina, wine flavoured with pine resin, was also drunk, as it still is in Greece today, producing similar reactions from unfamiliar visitors; "To add to our calamity the Greek wine, on account of being mixed with pitch, resin, and plaster was to us undrinkable," complained Liutprand of Cremona, who was the ambassador sent to Constantinople in 968 by the German Holy Roman Emperor Otto I.[243] The garos fish sauce condiment was also not much appreciated by the unaccustomed; Liutprand of Cremona described being served food covered in an "exceedingly bad fish liquor."[243] The Byzantines also used a soy sauce like condiment, murri, a fermented barley sauce, which, like soy sauce, provided umami flavouring to their dishes.[244][245] Flags and insignia[edit] Main article: Byzantine flags and insignia The double-headed eagle, a common Imperial symbol For most of its history, the Byzantine Empire did not know or use heraldry in the West European sense. Various emblems (Greek: σημεία, sēmeia; sing. σημείον, sēmeion) were used in official occasions and for military purposes, such as banners or shields displaying various motifs such as the cross or the labarum. The use of the cross, and of images of Christ, the Virgin Mary and various saints is also attested on seals of officials, but these were personal rather than family emblems.[246] Double-headed eagle Tetragrammic cross Language[edit] Further information: Medieval Greek Left: The Mudil Psalter, the oldest complete psalter in the Coptic language (Coptic Museum, Egypt, Coptic Cairo) Right: The Joshua Roll, a 10th-century illuminated Greek manuscript possibly made in Constantinople (Vatican Library, Rome) Distribution of Greek dialects in Anatolia in the late Byzantine Empire through to 1923. Demotic in yellow. Pontic in orange. Cappadocian in green. (Green dots indicate Cappadocian Greek speaking villages in 1910.[247]) Apart from the Imperial court, administration and military, the primary language used in the eastern Roman provinces even before the decline of the Western Empire was Greek, having been spoken in the region for centuries before Latin.[248] Following Rome's conquest of the east its 'Pax Romana', inclusionist political practices and development of public infrastructure, facilitated the further spreading and entrenchment of Greek language in the east. Indeed, early on in the life of the Roman Empire, Greek had become the common language of the Church, the language of scholarship and the arts, and to a large degree the lingua franca for trade between provinces and with other nations.[249] Greek for a time became diglossic with the spoken language, known as Koine (eventually evolving into Demotic Greek), used alongside an older written form (Attic Greek) until Koine won out as the spoken and written standard.[250] The emperor Diocletian (r. 284–305) sought to renew the authority of Latin, making it the official language of the Roman administration also in the East, and the Greek expression ἡ κρατοῦσα διάλεκτος (hē kratousa dialektos) attests to the status of Latin as "the language of power."[251] In the early 5th century, Greek gained equal status with Latin as official language in the East and emperors gradually began to legislate in Greek rather than Latin starting with the reign of Leo I the Thracian in the 460s.[39] The last Eastern emperor to stress the importance of Latin was Justinian I (r. 527–565), whose Corpus Juris Civilis was written almost entirely in Latin. He may also have been the last native Latin-speaking emperor.[39] The use of Latin as the language of administration persisted until adoption of Greek as the sole official language by Heraclius in the 7th century. Scholarly Latin would rapidly fall into disuse among the educated classes although the language would continue to be at least a ceremonial part of the Empire's culture for some time.[252] Additionally, Latin remained a minority language in the Empire, mainly on the Italian peninsula and along the Dalmatian coast, eventually developing into various Romance languages like Dalmatian.[253] Many other languages existed in the multi-ethnic Empire, and some of these were given limited official status in their provinces at various times.[254] Notably, by the beginning of the Middle Ages, Syriac had become more widely used by the educated classes in the far eastern provinces.[255] Similarly Coptic, Armenian, and Georgian became significant among the educated in their provinces.[256] Later foreign contacts made Old Church Slavic, Middle Persian, and Arabic important in the Empire and its sphere of influence.[257] There was a revival of Latin studies in the 10th century for the same reason and by the 11th century knowledge of Latin was no longer unusual at Constantinople.[258] There was widespread use of the Armenian and various Slavic languages, which became more pronounced in the border regions of the empire.[254] Aside from these languages, since Constantinople was a prime trading center in the Mediterranean region and beyond, virtually every known language of the Middle Ages was spoken in the Empire at some time, even Chinese.[259] As the Empire entered its final decline, the Empire's citizens became more culturally homogeneous and the Greek language became integral to their identity and religion.[260] Recreation[edit] A game of τάβλι (tabula) played by Byzantine emperor Zeno in 480 and recorded by Agathias in c. 530 because of a very unlucky dice throw for Zeno (red), as he threw 2, 5 and 6 and was forced to leave eight pieces alone.[261] Byzantines were avid players of tavli (Byzantine Greek: τάβλη), a game known in English as backgammon, which is still popular in former Byzantine realms, and still known by the name tavli in Greece.[261] Byzantine nobles were devoted to horsemanship, particularly tzykanion, now known as polo. The game came from Sassanid Persia in the early period and a Tzykanisterion (stadium for playing the game) was built by Theodosius II (r. 408–450) inside the Great Palace of Constantinople. Emperor Basil I (r. 867–886) excelled at it; Emperor Alexander (r. 912–913) died from exhaustion while playing, Emperor Alexios I Komnenos (r. 1081–1118) was injured while playing with Tatikios, and John I of Trebizond (r. 1235–1238) died from a fatal injury during a game.[262][263] Aside from Constantinople and Trebizond, other Byzantine cities also featured tzykanisteria, most notably Sparta, Ephesus, and Athens, an indication of a thriving urban aristocracy.[264] The game was introduced to the West by crusaders, who developed a taste for it particularly during the pro-Western reign of emperor Manuel I Komnenos. Economy[edit] Further information: Byzantine economy and Byzantine silk Further information: Sino-Roman relations Gold coin of Justinian I (527–565 CE) excavated in India probably in the south, an example of Indo-Roman trade during the period The Byzantine economy was among the most advanced in Europe and the Mediterranean for many centuries. Europe, in particular, could not match Byzantine economic strength until late in the Middle Ages. Constantinople operated as a prime hub in a trading network that at various times extended across nearly all of Eurasia and North Africa, in particular as the primary western terminus of the famous Silk Road. Until the first half of the 6th century and in sharp contrast with the decaying West, the Byzantine economy was flourishing and resilient.[265] The Plague of Justinian and the Arab conquests would represent a substantial reversal of fortunes contributing to a period of stagnation and decline. Isaurian reforms and Constantine V's repopulation, public works and tax measures marked the beginning of a revival that continued until 1204, despite territorial contraction.[266] From the 10th century until the end of the 12th, the Byzantine Empire projected an image of luxury and travellers were impressed by the wealth accumulated in the capital.[267] The Fourth Crusade resulted in the disruption of Byzantine manufacturing and the commercial dominance of the Western Europeans in the eastern Mediterranean, events that amounted to an economic catastrophe for the Empire.[267] The Palaiologoi tried to revive the economy, but the late Byzantine state would not gain full control of either the foreign or domestic economic forces. Gradually, Constantinople also lost its influence on the modalities of trade and the price mechanisms, and its control over the outflow of precious metals and, according to some scholars, even over the minting of coins.[268] One of the economic foundations of Byzantium was trade, fostered by the maritime character of the Empire. Textiles must have been by far the most important item of export; silks were certainly imported into Egypt, and appeared also in Bulgaria, and the West.[269] The state strictly controlled both the internal and the international trade, and retained the monopoly of issuing coinage, maintaining a durable and flexible monetary system adaptable to trade needs.[270] The government attempted to exercise formal control over interest rates, and set the parameters for the activity of the guilds and corporations, in which it had a special interest. The emperor and his officials intervened at times of crisis to ensure the provisioning of the capital, and to keep down the price of cereals. Finally, the government often collected part of the surplus through taxation, and put it back into circulation, through redistribution in the form of salaries to state officials, or in the form of investment in public works.[270] Legacy[edit] See also: Third Rome and Greek scholars in the Renaissance Christ Pantocrator fresco in Hagia Sophia, circa 1261 Byzantine culture Aristocracy and bureaucracy Army Art Architecture Calendar Cities Coinage Cuisine Dance Diplomacy Dress Economy Gardens Law Literature Medicine Music Navy People Science v t e Byzantium has been often identified with absolutism, orthodox spirituality, orientalism and exoticism, while the terms "Byzantine" and "Byzantinism" have been used as bywords for decadence, complex bureaucracy, and repression. Both Eastern and Western European authors have often perceived Byzantium as a body of religious, political, and philosophical ideas contrary to those of the West. Even in 19th-century Greece, the focus was mainly on the classical past, while Byzantine tradition had been associated with negative connotations.[271] This traditional approach towards Byzantium has been partially or wholly disputed and revised by modern studies, which focus on the positive aspects of Byzantine culture and legacy. Averil Cameron regards as undeniable the Byzantine contribution to the formation of medieval Europe, and both Cameron and Obolensky recognise the major role of Byzantium in shaping Orthodoxy, which in turn occupies a central position in the history and societies of Greece, Romania, Bulgaria, Russia, Georgia, Serbia and other countries.[272] The Byzantines also preserved and copied classical manuscripts, and they are thus regarded as transmitters of classical knowledge, as important contributors to modern European civilisation, and as precursors of both Renaissance humanism and Slavic-Orthodox culture.[273] As the only stable long-term state in Europe during the Middle Ages, Byzantium isolated Western Europe from newly emerging forces to the East. Constantly under attack, it distanced Western Europe from Persians, Arabs, Seljuk Turks, and for a time, the Ottomans. From a different perspective, since the 7th century, the evolution and constant reshaping of the Byzantine state were directly related to the respective progress of Islam.[273] Following the conquest of Constantinople by the Ottoman Turks in 1453, Sultan Mehmed II took the title "Kaysar-i Rûm" (the Ottoman Turkish equivalent of Caesar of Rome), since he was determined to make the Ottoman Empire the heir of the Eastern Roman Empire.[274] See also[edit] Ancient Rome portal Byzantine Empire portal Christianity portal Greece portal Middle Ages portal Byzantine Army Byzantine philosophy Byzantine Rite Index of Byzantine Empire-related articles Family trees of the Byzantine imperial dynasties Byzantine Empire under the Palaiologos dynasty List of Byzantine emperors List of Byzantine inventions List of Byzantine revolts and civil wars List of Byzantine wars Despotate of the Morea List of Roman dynasties Succession of the Roman Empire Legacy of the Roman Empire Notes[edit] ^ "Romania" was a popular name of the empire used mainly unofficially, which meant "land of the Romans".[11] After 1081, it occasionally appears in official Byzantine documents as well. In 1204, the leaders of the Fourth Crusade gave the name Romania to their newly founded Latin Empire.[12] The term does not refer to modern Romania. References[edit] Citations[edit] ^ "Byzantine Empire". Encyclopædia Britannica. ^ Kazhdan & Epstein 1985, p. 1. ^ Ostrogorsky 1969, pp. 105–07, 109; Norwich 1998, p. 97; Haywood 2001, pp. 2.17, 3.06, 3.15. ^ Millar 2006, pp. 2, 15; James 2010, p. 5; Freeman 1999, pp. 431, 435–37, 459–62; Baynes & Moss 1948, p. xx; Ostrogorsky 1969, p. 27; Kaldellis 2007, pp. 2–3; Kazhdan & Constable 1982, p. 12; Norwich 1998, p. 383. ^ Haldon, John; Haldon, Shelby Cullom Davis 3.0. Professor of European History Professor of History Hellenic Studies John (2002). Warfare, State And Society in the Byzantine World 560–1204. p. 47. ISBN 978-1-135-36437-3. ^ Pounds, Norman John Greville. An Historical Geography of Europe, 1500–1840, p. 124. CUP Archive, 1979. ISBN 0-521-22379-2. ^ "The End of the Byzantine Empire, 1081–1453". Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. ^ William Miller, Trebizond: The last Greek Empire of the Byzantine Era: 1204–1461, 1926 (Chicago: Argonaut, 1969), pp. 100–06 ^ Fox, What, If Anything, Is a Byzantine?; Rosser 2011, p. 1 ^ Rosser 2011, p. 2. ^ Fossier & Sondheimer 1997, p. 104. ^ Wolff 1948, pp. 5–7, 33–34. ^ Cinnamus 1976, p. 240. ^ Browning 1992, "Introduction", p. xiii: "The Byzantines did not call themselves Byzantines, but Romaioi–Romans. They were well aware of their role as heirs of the Roman Empire, which for many centuries had united under a single government the whole Mediterranean world and much that was outside it." ^ Nicol, Donald M. (30 December 1967). "The Byzantine View of Western Europe". Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies. 8 (4): 318. ISSN 2159-3159. ^ Ahrweiler & Laiou 1998, p. 3; Mango 2002, p. 13. ^ Gabriel 2002, p. 277. ^ Ahrweiler & Laiou 1998, p. vii; Davies 1996, p. 245; Gross 1999, p. 45; Lapidge, Blair & Keynes 1998, p. 79; Millar 2006, pp. 2, 15; Moravcsik 1970, pp. 11–12; Ostrogorsky 1969, pp. 28, 146; Browning 1983, p. 113. ^ Klein 2004, p. 290 (Note #39); Annales Fuldenses, 389: "Mense lanuario c. epiphaniam Basilii, Graecorum imperatoris, legati cum muneribus et epistolis ad Hludowicum regem Radasbonam venerunt ...". ^ Fouracre & Gerberding 1996, p. 345: "The Frankish court no longer regarded the Byzantine Empire as holding valid claims of universality; instead it was now termed the 'Empire of the Greeks'." ^ Tarasov & Milner-Gulland 2004, p. 121; El-Cheikh 2004, p. 22 ^ a b Ostrogorsky 1959, p. 21; Wells 1922, Chapter 33. ^ Bury 1923, p. 1; Kuhoff 2002, pp. 177–78. ^ Bury 1923, p. 1; Esler 2004, p. 1081; Gibbon 1906, Volume III, Part IV, Chapter 18, p. 168; Teall 1967, pp. 13, 19–23, 25, 28–30, 35–36 ^ Bury 1923, p. 63; Drake 1995, p. 5; Grant 1975, pp. 4, 12. ^ Bowersock 1997, p. 79 ^ Greatrex & Lieu 2002, p. 1 ^ Friell & Williams 2005, p. 105 ^ Perrottet 2004, p. 190 ^ Cameron 2009, pp. 54, 111, 153. ^ Alemany 2000, p. 207; Bayless 1976, pp. 176–77; Treadgold 1997, pp. 184, 193. ^ Cameron 2009, p. 52 ^ a b Burns 1991, pp. 65, 76–77, 86–87 ^ Lenski 1999, pp. 428–29. ^ Grierson 1999, p. 17. ^ Postan, Miller & Postan 1987, p. 140. ^ Chapman 1971, p. 210 ^ Meier 2003, p. 290. ^ a b c The Inheritance of Rome, Chris Wickham, Penguin Books Ltd. 2009, ISBN 978-0-670-02098-0. p. 90. ^ Haldon 1990, p. 17 ^ Evans 2005, p. 104 ^ Gregory 2010, p. 150. ^ Merryman & Perez-Perdomo 2007, p. 7 ^ Gregory 2010, p. 137; Meier 2003, pp. 297–300. ^ Gregory 2010, p. 145. ^ Evans 2005, p. xxv. ^ Bury 1923, pp. 180–216; Evans 2005, pp. xxvi, 76. ^ Sotinel 2005, p. 278; Treadgold 1997, p. 187. ^ Bury 1923, pp. 236–58; Evans 2005, p. xxvi. ^ Bury 1923, pp. 259–81; Evans 2005, p. 93. ^ Bury 1923, pp. 286–88; Evans 2005, p. 11. ^ Greatrex 2005, p. 489; Greatrex & Lieu 2002, p. 113 ^ Bury 1920, "Preface", pp. v–vi ^ Evans 2005, pp. 11, 56–62; Sarantis 2009, passim. ^ Evans 2005, p. 65 ^ Evans 2005, p. 68 ^ Cameron 2009, pp. 113, 128. ^ Bray 2004, pp. 19–47; Haldon 1990, pp. 110–11; Treadgold 1997, pp. 196–97. ^ a b Louth 2005, pp. 113–15 harvnb error: no target: CITEREFLouth2005 (help); Nystazopoulou-Pelekidou 1970, passim; Treadgold 1997, pp. 231–32. ^ Fine 1991, p. 33 ^ Foss 1975, p. 722. ^ Haldon 1990, p. 41; Speck 1984, p. 178. ^ Haldon 1990, pp. 42–43. ^ Grabar 1984, p. 37; Cameron 1979, p. 23. ^ Cameron 1979, pp. 5–6, 20–22. ^ Norwich 1998, p. 93 ^ Haldon 1990, p. 46; Baynes 1912, passim; Speck 1984, p. 178. ^ Foss 1975, pp. 746–47. ^ Haldon 1990, p. 50. ^ Haldon 1990, pp. 61–62. ^ Haldon 1990, pp. 102–14; Laiou & Morisson 2007, p. 47. ^ Laiou & Morisson 2007, pp. 38–42, 47; Wickham 2009, p. 260. ^ Haldon 1990, pp. 208–15; Kaegi 2003, pp. 236, 283. ^ Heather 2005, p. 431. ^ Haldon 1990, pp. 43–45, 66, 114–15 ^ a b Haldon 1990, pp. 66–67. ^ Haldon 1990, p. 71. ^ Haldon 1990, pp. 70–78, 169–71; Haldon 2004, pp. 216–17; Kountoura-Galake 1996, pp. 62–75. ^ Cameron 2009, pp. 67–68. ^ Cameron 2009, pp. 167–70; Garland 1999, p. 89. ^ Parry 1996, pp. 11–15. ^ Cameron 2009, p. 267. ^ a b c d Browning 1992, p. 95. ^ Treadgold 1997, pp. 432–33. ^ a b c d Browning 1992, p. 96. ^ Karlin-Heyer 1967, p. 24 ^ a b c Browning 1992, p. 101. ^ Browning 1992, p. 107. ^ Browning 1992, p. 108. ^ Browning 1992, p. 112. ^ Browning 1992, p. 113. ^ a b c Browning 1992, p. 116. ^ Browning 1992, p. 100. ^ Browning 1992, pp. 102–03. ^ Browning 1992, pp. 103–05. ^ Browning 1992, pp. 106–07. ^ Browning 1992, pp. 112–13. ^ a b c Browning 1992, p. 115. ^ a b c Browning 1992, pp. 114–15. ^ a b Cameron 2009, p. 77. ^ Cyril Toumanoff (31 October 2018). "Caucasia and Byzantium". In Stephen H. Rapp; Paul Crego (eds.). Languages and Cultures of Eastern Christianity: Georgian. Taylor & Francis. p. 62. ISBN 978-1-351-92326-2. ^ a b Browning 1992, pp. 97–98. ^ Browning 1992, pp. 98–99. ^ Browning 1992, pp. 98–109. ^ Laiou & Morisson 2007, pp. 130–31; Pounds 1979, p. 124. ^ Duiker & Spielvogel 2010, p. 317. ^ Timberlake 2004, p. 14. ^ Patterson 1995, p. 15. ^ Cameron 2009, p. 83. ^ Treadgold 1997, pp. 548–49. ^ a b Markham, "The Battle of Manzikert". ^ Vasiliev 1928–1935, "Relations with Italy and Western Europe". ^ Hooper & Bennett 1996, p. 82; Stephenson 2000, p. 157. ^ "Byzantine Empire". Encyclopædia Britannica. 2002. ; Markham, "The Battle of Manzikert". ^ a b Browning 1992, p. 190. ^ Cameron 2006, p. 46. ^ Cameron 2006, p. 42. ^ Cameron 2006, p. 47. ^ a b Browning 1992, pp. 198–208. ^ a b Browning 1992, p. 218. ^ Magdalino 2002a, p. 124. ^ a b "Byzantine Empire". Encyclopædia Britannica. ^ Birkenmeier 2002. ^ a b Harris 2014; Read 2000, p. 124; Watson 1993, p. 12. ^ Komnene 1928, Alexiad, 10.261 ^ Komnene 1928, Alexiad, 13.348–13.358; Birkenmeier 2002, p. 46. ^ Norwich 1998, p. 267. ^ Ostrogorsky 1969, p. 377. ^ Birkenmeier 2002, p. 90. ^ Cinnamus 1976, pp. 74–75. ^ Harris 2014, p. 84. ^ Magdalino 2002a, p. 74. ^ Sedlar 1994, p. 372. ^ Magdalino 2002a, p. 67. ^ Birkenmeier 2002, p. 128. ^ Birkenmeier 2002, p. 196. ^ Birkenmeier 2002, pp. 185–86. ^ Birkenmeier 2002, p. 1. ^ Day 1977, pp. 289–90; Harvey 2003. ^ Diehl 1948. ^ Tatakes & Moutafakis 2003, p. 110. ^ Norwich 1998, p. 291. ^ a b c Norwich 1998, p. 292. ^ a b Ostrogorsky 1969, p. 397. ^ Harris 2014, p. 118. ^ Norwich 1998, p. 293. ^ Norwich 1998, pp. 294–95. ^ Angold 1997; Paparrigopoulos & Karolidis 1925, p. 216 ^ Vasiliev 1928–1935, "Foreign Policy of the Angeloi". ^ Norwich 1998, p. 299. ^ Britannica Concise, Siege of Zara Archived 6 July 2007 at the Wayback Machine. ^ Norwich 1998, p. 301. ^ Choniates 1912, The Sack of Constantinople. ^ "The Fourth Crusade and the Latin Empire of Constantinople". Encyclopædia Britannica. ^ Norwich 1982, pp. 127–43. ^ A. A. Vasiliev, "The Foundation of the Empire of Trebizond (1204–1222)", Speculum, 11 (1936), pp. 18f ^ Kean 2006; Madden 2005, p. 162. ^ Köprülü 1992, pp. 33–41. ^ Madden 2005, p. 179; Reinert 2002, p. 260. ^ a b Reinert 2002, p. 257. ^ Reinert 2002, p. 261. ^ Reinert 2002, p. 268. ^ Reinert 2002, p. 270. ^ Runciman 1990, pp. 71–72. ^ a b Runciman 1990, pp. 84–85. ^ Runciman 1990, pp. 84–86. ^ Hindley 2004, p. 300. ^ Russell, Eugenia (28 March 2013). Literature and Culture in Late Byzantine Thessalonica. A&C Black. ISBN 978-1-4411-5584-9. ^ Miller 1907, p. 236 ^ Lowry 2003, pp. 115–16. ^ Clark 2000, p. 213. ^ Seton-Watson 1967, p. 31. ^ Mango 2007, pp. 259–60. ^ Louth 2005, p. 291 harvnb error: no target: CITEREFLouth2005 (help); Neville 2004, p. 7. ^ Cameron 2009, pp. 138–42; Mango 2007, p. 60. ^ Cameron 2009, pp. 157–58; Neville 2004, p. 34. ^ Neville 2004, p. 13. ^ a b Neumann 2006, pp. 869–71. ^ Chrysos 1992, p. 35. ^ Antonucci 1993, pp. 11–13. ^ Antonucci 1993, pp. 11–13; Seeck 1876, pp. 31–33 ^ Bury & Philotheus 1911, p. 93. ^ Dennis 1985, p. 125. ^ Obolensky 1994, p. 3. ^ Anastos 1962, p. 409. ^ Alexander Jones, "Book Review, Archimedes Manuscript" American Mathematical Society, May 2005. ^ "Pendentive – architecture". ^ Field, J. V.; Wright, M. T. (22 August 2006). "Gears from the Byzantines: A portable sundial with calendrical gearing". Annals of Science. 42 (2): 87. doi:10.1080/00033798500200131. ^ "Anonymous, Byzantine sundial-cum-calendar". brunelleschi.imss.fi.it. ^ "Sundial info" (PDF). academy.edu.gr. ^ a b Partington, J.R. (1999). "A History of Greek Fire and Gunpowder". The Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 13. ^ Prioreschi, Plinio. 2004. A History of Medicine: Byzantine and Islamic medicine. Horatius Press. p. 42. ^ Pevny, Olenka Z. (2000). "Perceptions of Byzantium and Its Neighbors: 843–1261". Yale University Press. pp. 94–95. ^ "John Philoponus, Commentary on Aristotle's Physics, pp". homepages.wmich.edu. Archived from the original on 11 January 2016. Retrieved 25 April 2018. ^ Wildberg, Christian (8 March 2018). Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University – via Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. ^ a b Lindberg, David. (1992) The Beginnings of Western Science. University of Chicago Press. p. 162. ^ Wikander, Orjan. 2000. "Handbook of Ancient Water Technology". Brill. pp. 383–84. ^ "Boat mills: water powered, floating factories". Low-Tech Magazine. ^ Troianos & Velissaropoulou-Karakosta 1997, p. 340 ^ Lindberg, David. (1992) The Beginnings of Western Science. University of Chicago Press. p. 349. ^ Prioreschi, Plinio. 2004. A History of Medicine: Byzantine and Islamic medicine. Horatius Press. p. 146. ^ "The Case of Conjoined Twins in 10th Century Byzantium". Medievalists.net. 4 January 2014. ^ Montandon, Denys (December 2015). "The Unspeakable History of Thoracopagus Twins' Separation" (PDF). denysmontandon.com. ^ "Greek fire – weaponry". ^ Tucker, Spencer C. 2011. "The Encyclopedia of the Vietnam War: A Political, Social, and Military History”. ABC-CLIO. p. 450. ^ "Greek Fire Grenades". ^ "Greek Fire". ^ Decker, Michael J. (2013). The Byzantine Art of War. Westholme Publishing. p. 226. ^ Decker, Michael J. (2013). The Byzantine Art of War. Westholme Publishing. pp. 227–29. ^ Tatakes & Moutafakis 2003, p. 189. ^ Robins 1993, p. 8. ^ Jennifer Fretland VanVoorst (2012). The Byzantine Empire. Capstone. p. 14. ISBN 978-0-7565-4565-9. ^ Runciman 2004, pp. 1–2, 162–63. ^ Mango 2007, p. 108. ^ Meyendorff 1982, p. 13. ^ Meyendorff 1982, p. 19. ^ Meyendorff 1982, p. 130. ^ Mark Cartwright (18 December 2017). "Byzantine Monasticism". Ancient History Encyclopedia. ^ Justinian Code: Book 1, Title 1; Blume 2008, Headnote C. 1.1; Mango 2007, p. 108. ^ Mango 2007, pp. 108–09. ^ Blume 2008, Headnote C. 1.1; Mango 2007, pp. 108–09, 115–25. ^ Mango 2007, pp. 115–25. ^ Mango 2007, pp. 111–14. ^ Rice 1968; Weitzmann 1982. ^ Rice 1968, Chapters 15–17; Weitzmann 1982, Chapters 2–7; Evans 2004, pp. 389–555. ^ a b Mango 2007, pp. 275–76. ^ "Byzantine Literature". Catholic Encyclopedia. ^ Ring, Trudy (1994). International Dictionary of Historic Places: Middle East and Africa. 4. Taylor & Francis. p. 318. ISBN 978-1-884964-03-9. ^ The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, 6th ed. 2007 – "Byzantine music" ^ "Ecumenical Patriarchate – Byzantine Music". ec-patr.net. ^ Kartomi 1990, p. 124. ^ "lira". Encyclopædia Britannica. 2009. ^ Arkenberg, Rebecca (October 2002). "Renaissance Violins". Metropolitan Museum of Art. Retrieved 22 September 2006. ^ Journal of Sport History, Vol. 8, No. 3 (Winter, 1981) p. 44. ^ a b Douglas Earl Bush, Richard Kassel editors, The Organ: An Encyclopedia Routledge. 2006. ISBN 978-0-415-94174-7. p. 327 ^ Howard, Albert A. (1893). "The Αὐλός or Tibia". Harvard Studies in Classical Philology. 4: 1–60. doi:10.2307/310399. JSTOR 310399. ^ Flood, William Henry Grattan. The story of the bagpipe. Рипол Классик. ISBN 978-1-176-34422-8. ^ Ash 1995, p. 224: "Having inherited pastirma from the Byzantines, the Turks took it with them when they conquered Hungary and Romania." ^ Davidson 2014, "Byzantine cookery", pp. 123–24: "This is certainly true of Byzantine cuisine. Dried meat, a forerunner of the pastirma of modern Turkey, became a delicacy." ^ Dalby et al. 2013, p. 81: "paston or tarichon...Cured meats were either eaten raw or cooked in pasto-mageireia with bulgur and greens, mainly cabbage." ^ Ash 1995, p. 223; Faas 2005, p. 184; Vryonis 1971, p. 482. ^ Faas 2005, pp. 184–85; Vryonis 1971, p. 482; Salaman 1986, p. 184. ^ a b Halsall, Paul (January 1996). "Medieval Sourcebook: Liutprand of Cremona: Report of his Mission to Constantinople". Internet History Sourcebooks Project. Fordham University. Retrieved 25 June 2016. ^ Jayyusi & Marín 1994, p. 729. ^ Perry, Charles (31 October 2001). "The Soy Sauce That Wasn't". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 25 June 2016. ^ Kazhdan 1991, pp. 472, 999. ^ Dawkins, R.M. 1916. Modern Greek in Asia Minor. A study of dialect of Silly, Cappadocia and Pharasa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ^ Millar 2006, p. 279. ^ Bryce 1901, p. 59; McDonnell 2006, p. 77; Millar 2006, pp. 97–98; Oikonomides 1999, pp. 12–13. ^ Oikonomides 1999, pp. 12–13. ^ Rochette, "Language Policies in the Roman Republic and Empire," p. 560. ^ Apostolides 1992, pp. 25–26; Wroth 1908, Introduction, Section 6 ^ Sedlar 1994, pp. 403–40. ^ a b Harris 2014, p. 12 ^ Beaton 1996, p. 10; Jones 1986, p. 991; Versteegh 1977, Chapter 1. ^ Campbell 2000, p. 40; Hacikyan et al. 2002, Part 1 ^ Baynes 1907, p. 289; Gutas 1998, Chapter 7, Section 4; Comrie 1987, p. 129. ^ Byzantine Civilisation, Steven Runciman, Hodder & Stoughton Educational (1933) ISBN 978-0-7131-5316-3, p. 232 ^ Beckwith 1993, p. 171; Halsall 1998; Oikonomides 1999, p. 20. ^ Kaldellis 2007, Chapter 6; Nicol 1993, Chapter 5. ^ a b Austin 1934, pp. 202–05. ^ Kazhdan 1991. ^ Anna Komnene,The Alexiad, Book XIV, Chapter IV, translator Elizabeth Dawes ^ Kazanaki-Lappa 2002, p. 643. ^ Laiou & Morisson 2007, pp. 1, 23–38. ^ Laiou & Morisson 2007, pp. 3, 45, 49–50, 231; Magdalino 2002b, p. 532. ^ a b Laiou & Morisson 2007, pp. 90–91, 127, 166–69, 203–04; Magdalino 2002b, p. 535. ^ Matschke 2002, pp. 805–06. ^ Laiou 2002b, p. 723; Laiou & Morisson 2007, p. 13. ^ a b Laiou 2002a, pp. 3–4; Laiou & Morisson 2007, p. 18. ^ Cameron 2009, pp. 277–81. ^ Cameron 2009, pp. 186–277. ^ a b Cameron 2009, p. 261. ^ Béhar 1999, p. 38; Bideleux & Jeffries 1998, p. 71. Sources[edit] Primary sources[edit] Bury, John Bagnеll, ed. (1920). The Early History of the Slavonic Settlements in Dalmatia, Croatia, & Serbia – Constantine Porphyrogennetos, De Administrando Imperio, Chapters 29-36. New York: Macmillan. (in Greek) Choniates, Nicetas (1912). "The Sack of Constantinople (1204)". Translations and Reprints from the Original Sources of European History by D.C. Munro (Series 1, Vol 3:1). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. pp. 15–16. Cinnamus, Ioannes (1976). Deeds of John and Manuel Comnenus. New York and West Sussex: Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-04080-8. Eusebius. Life of Constantine (Book IV). Christian Classics Ethereal Library. Geoffrey of Villehardouin (1963). "The Conquest of Constantinople". Chronicles of the Crusades (translated by Margaret R. Shaw). Penguin Classics. ISBN 978-0-14-044124-6. Komnene, Anna (1928). "Books X–XIII". The Alexiad (translated by Elizabeth A.S. Dawes). Internet Medieval Sourcebook. Seeck, Otto, ed. (1876). Notitia Dignitatum; accedunt Notitia Urbis Constantinopolitanae Laterculi Prouinciarum. Berlin: Weidmann. Thurn, Hans, ed. (1973). Ioannis Scylitzae Synopsis historiarum. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter. ISBN 978-3-11-002285-8. Secondary sources[edit] Alemany, Agustí (2000). Sources on the Alans: A Critical Compilation. Leiden: Brill. pp. 170–243. ISBN 978-90-04-11442-5. Ahrweiler, Hélène; Laiou, Angeliki E. (1998). "Preface". Studies on the Internal Diaspora of the Byzantine Empire. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks. ISBN 978-0-88402-247-3. Anastos, Milton V. (1962). "The History of Byzantine Science. Report on the Dumbarton Oaks Symposium of 1961". Dumbarton Oaks Papers. 16: 409–11. doi:10.2307/1291170. ISSN 0070-7546. JSTOR 1291170. Angold, Michael (1997). The Byzantine Empire, 1025–1204: A Political History. London: Longman. ISBN 978-0-582-29468-4. Antonucci, Michael (1993). "War by Other Means: The Legacy of Byzantium". History Today. 43 (2): 11–13. ISSN 0018-2753. Retrieved 21 May 2007. Apostolides, Sophocles Evangelinus (1992). Greek Lexicon of the Roman and Byzantine Periods. Hildesheim: Georg Olms. ISBN 978-3-487-05765-1. Ash, John (1995). A Byzantine Journey. New York: Random House Incorporated. ISBN 978-1-84511-307-0. Austin, Roland G. (1934). "Zeno's Game of τάβλη". The Journal of Hellenic Studies. 54 (2): 202–05. doi:10.2307/626864. JSTOR 626864. Bayless, William N. (1976). "The Treaty with the Huns of 443". The American Journal of Philology. 97 (2): 176–79. doi:10.2307/294410. JSTOR 294410. Baynes, Norman Hepburn (1912). "The Restoration of the Cross at Jerusalem". The English Historical Review. 27 (106): 287–99. doi:10.1093/ehr/XXVII.CVI.287. ISSN 0013-8266. Baynes, Norman Hepburn; Moss, Henry St. Lawrence Beaufort, eds. (1948). Byzantium: An Introduction to East Roman Civilization. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press. Baynes, Spencer (1907). "Vlachs". Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed.). New York. Beaton, Roderick (1996). The Medieval Greek Romance. New York and London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-12032-6. Beckwith, John (1993) [1970]. Early Christian and Byzantine Art. New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-05296-1. Béhar, Pierre (1999). Vestiges d'Empires: La Décomposition de l'Europe Centrale et Balkanique. Paris: Éditions Desjonquères. ISBN 978-2-84321-015-0. Benz, Ernst (1963). The Eastern Orthodox Church: Its Thought and Life. Piscataway: Aldine Transaction. ISBN 978-0-202-36298-4. Bideleux, Robert; Jeffries, Ian (1998). A History of Eastern Europe: Crisis and Change. New York and London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-16111-4. Birkenmeier, John W. (2002). The Development of the Komnenian Army: 1081–1180. Leiden: Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-11710-5. Blume, Fred H. (2008). Kearley, Timothy (ed.). Annotated Justinian Code. Laramie: University of Wyoming. Bowersock, G.M. (1997). Julian the Apostate. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-48882-3. Bray, R.S. (2004). Armies of Pestilence: The Impact of Disease on History. James Clarke. ISBN 978-0-227-17240-7. Browning, Robert (1983). "The Continuity of Hellenism in the Byzantine world: Appearance or Reality?". In Winnifrith, Tom; Murray, Penelope (eds.). Greece Old and New. New York: Macmillan. pp. 111–28. ISBN 978-0-333-27836-9. Browning, Robert (1992). The Byzantine Empire. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press. ISBN 978-0-8132-0754-4. Bryce, James (1901). Studies in History and Jurisprudence, Vol. 1. H. Frowde. ISBN 978-1-4021-9046-9. Brooke, Zachary Nugent (1962). A History of Europe, from 911 to 1198. London: Methuen. Burns, Thomas S. (1991). A History of Ostrogoths. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. ISBN 978-0-253-20600-8. Bury, John Bagnall (1923). History of the Later Roman Empire. London: Macmillan. Bury, John Bagnall; Philotheus (1911). The Imperial Administrative System of the Ninth Century: With a Revised Text of the Kletorologion of Philotheos. London: Oxford University Press. Cameron, Averil (1979). "Images of Authority: Elites and Icons in Late Sixth-century Byzantium". Past and Present. 84 (1): 3. doi:10.1093/past/84.1.3. Cameron, Averil (2006). The Byzantines. Oxford, England: Blackwell. ISBN 978-1-4051-9833-2. Cameron, Averil (2009). Οι Βυζαντινοί (in Greek). Athens: Psychogios. ISBN 978-960-453-529-3. Campbell, George L. (2000) [1991]. Compendium of the World's Languages: Abaza to Kurdish. New York and London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-20296-1. Chapman, John H. (1971). Studies on the Early Papacy. Kennikat Press, University of Michigan. ISBN 978-0-8046-1139-8. Chrysos, Evangelos (1992). "Byzantine Diplomacy, CE 300–800: Means and End". In Jonathan Shepard, Simon Franklin (ed.). Byzantine Diplomacy: Papers from the Twenty-Fourth Spring Symposium of Byzantine Studies, Cambridge, March 1990 (Society for the Promotion of Byzant). Variorum. ISBN 978-0-86078-338-1. Clark, Victoria (2000). Why Angels Fall: A Journey through Orthodox Europe from Byzantium to Kosovo. London: Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-312-23396-9. Cohen, H. Floris (1994). The Scientific Revolution: A Historiographical Inquiry. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-11280-0. Comrie, Bernard (1987). "Russian". In Shopen, Timothy (ed.). Languages and Their Status. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. pp. 91–152. ISBN 978-0-8122-1249-5. Dalby, Andrew; Bourbou, Chryssi; Koder, Johannes; Leontsinē, Maria (2013). Flavours and Delights: Tastes and Pleasures of Ancient and Byzantine Cuisine. Athens and Thessaloniki: Armos Publications. ISBN 978-960-527-747-5. Davidson, Alan (2014). The Oxford Companion to Food. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-967733-7. Davies, Norman (1996). Europe: A History. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-820171-7. Day, Gerald W. (1977). "Manuel and the Genoese: A Reappraisal of Byzantine Commercial Policy in the Late Twelfth Century". The Journal of Economic History. 37 (2): 289–301. doi:10.1017/S0022050700096947. JSTOR 2118759. Dennis, George T. (1985). Three Byzantine Military Treatises. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks. Diehl, Charles (1948). "Byzantine Art". In Baynes, Norman Hepburn; Moss, Henry St. Lawrence Beaufort (eds.). Byzantium: An Introduction to East Roman Civilization. Oxford: Clarendon. OCLC 1058121. Drake, HA. (1995). "Constantine and Consensus". Church History. 64 (1): 1–15. doi:10.2307/3168653. JSTOR 3168653. Duiker, William J.; Spielvogel, Jackson J. (2010). The Essential World History. Boston: Wadsworth. ISBN 978-0-495-90227-0. El-Cheikh, Nadia Maria (2004). Byzantium Viewed by the Arabs. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-932885-30-2. Esler, Philip Francis (2004). The Early Christian World. New York and London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-33312-2. Evans, James Allan Stewart (2005). The Emperor Justinian and the Byzantine Empire. Westport: Greenwood. ISBN 978-0-313-32582-3. Evans, Helen C. (2004). Byzantium, Faith and Power (1261–1557). New York, NY: Metropolitan Museum of Art/Yale University Press. ISBN 978-1-58839-114-8. Faas, Patrick (2005) [1994]. Around the Roman Table: Food and Feasting in Ancient Rome. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-23347-5. Fine, John V. A. Jr. (1991) [1983]. The Early Medieval Balkans: A Critical Survey from the Sixth to the Late Twelfth Century. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press. ISBN 0-472-08149-7. Foss, Clive (1975). "The Persians in Asia Minor and the end of antiquity". The English Historical Review. 90 (357): 721–47. doi:10.1093/ehr/XC.CCCLVII.721. JSTOR 567292. Fossier, Robert; Sondheimer, Janet (1997). The Cambridge Illustrated History of the Middle Ages. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-26644-4. Fouracre, Paul; Gerberding, Richard A. (1996). Late Merovingian France: History and Hagiography, 640–720. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press. ISBN 978-0-7190-4791-6. Freeman, Charles (1999). The Greek Achievement – The Foundation of the Western World. New York: Penguin. ISBN 978-0-670-88515-2. Friell, Gerard; Williams, Stephen (2005). Theodosius: The Empire at Bay. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-135-78262-7. Gabriel, Richard A. (2002). The Great Armies of Antiquity. Westport: Greenwood. ISBN 978-0-275-97809-9. Garland, Lynda (1999). Byzantine Empresses: Women and Power in Byzantium, CE 527–1204. New York and London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-14688-3. Gibbon, Edward (1906). J.B. Bury (with an Introduction by W.E.H. Lecky) (ed.). The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire (Volumes II, III, and IX). New York, NY: Fred de Fau. Grabar, André (1984). L'iconoclasme Byzantin: le dossier archéologique. Flammarion. ISBN 978-2-08-081634-4. Grant, Robert M. (1975). "Religion and Politics at the Council at Nicaea". The Journal of Religion. 55 (1): 1–12. doi:10.1086/486406. JSTOR 1202069. Greatrex, Geoffrey B. (2005). "Byzantium and the East in the Sixth Century". In Maas, Michael (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Justinian. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. pp. 477–509. ISBN 978-0-521-81746-2. Greatrex, Geoffrey; Lieu, Samuel N.C. (2002). The Roman Eastern Frontier and the Persian Wars (Part II, 363–630 AD). New York and London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-14687-6. Gregory, Timothy E. (2010). A History of Byzantium. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 978-1-4051-8471-7. Grierson, Philip (1999). Byzantine Coinage (PDF). Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks. ISBN 978-0-88402-274-9. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 September 2007. Gross, Feliks (1999). Citizenship and Ethnicity: The Growth and Development of a Democratic Multiethnic Institution. Westport: Greenwood. ISBN 978-0-313-30932-8. Gutas, Dimitri (1998). Greek Thought, Arabic Culture: The Graeco-Arabic Translation Movement. New York and London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-06132-2. Hacikyan, Agop Jack; Basmajian, Gabriel; Franchuk, Edward S.; Ouzounian, Nourhan (2002). The Heritage of Armenian Literature: From the Sixth to the Eighteenth Century. Detroit: Wayne State University Press. ISBN 978-0-8143-3023-4. Haldon, John (1990). Byzantium in the Seventh Century: The Transformation of a Culture. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-31917-1. Haldon, John (2004). "The Fate of the Late Roman Senatorial Elite: Extinction or Transformation?". In John Haldon and Lawrence I. Conrad (ed.). The Byzantine and Early Islamic Near East VI: Elites Old and New in the Byzantine and Early Islamic Near East. Darwin. ISBN 978-0-87850-144-1. Halsall, Paul (1998). "East Asian History Sourcebook: Chinese Accounts of Rome, Byzantium and the Middle East, c. 91 B.C.E. – 1643 C.E." New York, NY: Fordham University. Retrieved 21 April 2012. Harris, Jonathan (2014). Byzantium and the Crusades (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury. ISBN 978-1-78093-767-0. Harvey, Alan (2003). Economic Expansion in the Byzantine Empire, 900–1200. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-52190-1. Haywood, John (2001) [1997]. Cassell's Atlas of World History. London: Cassell. ISBN 978-0-304-35757-4. Heather, Peter (2005). The Fall of the Roman Empire. London: Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-330-49136-5. Hindley, Geoffrey (2004). A Brief History of the Crusades. London: Robinson. ISBN 978-1-84119-766-1. Hooper, Nicholas; Bennett, Matthew (1996). The Cambridge Illustrated Atlas of Warfare: The Middle Ages. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-44049-3. James, Liz (2010). A Companion to Byzantium. Chichester: John Wiley. ISBN 978-1-4051-2654-0. Jayyusi, Salma Khadra; Marín, Manuela (1994) [1992]. The Legacy of Muslim Spain (2nd ed.). Leiden, New York and Köln: E.J. Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-09599-1. Jenkins, Romilly James Heald (1987). Byzantium: The Imperial Centuries, CE 610–1071. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. ISBN 978-0-8020-6667-1. Jones, Arnold Hugh Martin (1986). The Later Roman Empire, 284–602: A Social Economic and Administrative Survey. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 978-0-8018-3353-3. Kaegi, Walter Emil (2003). Heraclius, Emperor of Byzantium. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-81459-1. Kaldellis, Anthony (2007). Hellenism in Byzantium: The Transformations of Greek Identity and the Reception of the Classical Tradition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-87688-9. Kaldellis, Anthony (2015). The Byzantine Republic: People and Power in New Rome. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-36540-7. Karlin-Heyer, P. (1967). "When Military Affairs Were in Leo's Hands: A Note on Byzantine Foreign Policy (886–912)". Tradition. 23: 15–40. doi:10.1017/S0362152900008722. JSTOR 27830825. Kartomi, Margaret J. (1990). On Concepts and Classifications of Musical Instruments. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-42548-1. Kazanaki-Lappa, Maria (2002). "Medieval Athens" (PDF). In Angeliki E. Laiou (ed.). The Economic History of Byzantium (Volume 2). Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks. pp. 639–646. Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 February 2012. Kazhdan, Alexander Petrovich, ed. (1991). Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-504652-6. Kazhdan, Alexander Petrovich; Constable, Giles (1982). People and Power in Byzantium: An Introduction to Modern Byzantine Studies. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks. ISBN 978-0-88402-103-2. Kazhdan, Aleksandr Petrovich; Epstein, Ann Wharton (1985). Change in Byzantine Culture in the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-05129-4. Kean, Roger Michael (2006). Forgotten Power: Byzantium: Bulwark of Christianity. Shropshire: Thalamus. ISBN 978-1-902886-07-7. King, David A. (March 1991). "Reviews: The Astronomical Works of Gregory Chioniades, Volume I: The Zij al- Ala'i by Gregory Chioniades, David Pingree; An Eleventh-Century Manual of Arabo-Byzantine Astronomy by Alexander Jones". Isis. 82 (1): 116–18. doi:10.1086/355661. Klein, Holgen A. (2004). "Eastern Objects and Western Desires: Relics and Reliquaries between Byzantium and the West". Dumbarton Oaks Papers. 58: 283–314. doi:10.2307/3591389. JSTOR 3591389. Köprülü, Mehmet Fuad (1992). The Origins of the Ottoman Empire. Translated and edited by Gary Leiser. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. ISBN 978-0-7914-0819-3. Kountoura-Galake, Eleonora (1996). Ο βυζαντινός κλήρος και η κοινωνία των "Σκοτεινών Αἰώνων [The Byzantine Clergy and the Society of the 'Dark Ages'] (in Greek). Athens: Ethniko Idryma Erevnon. ISBN 978-960-7094-46-9. Kuhoff, Wolfgang (2002). "de:Die diokletianische Tetrarchie als Epoche einer historischen Wende in antiker und moderner Sicht". International Journal of the Classical Tradition (in German). 9 (2): 177–94. doi:10.1007/BF02898434. JSTOR 30224306. S2CID 162343296. Laiou, Angeliki E. (2002a). "Writing the Economic History of Byzantium" (PDF). In Angeliki E. Laiou (ed.). The Economic History of Byzantium (Volume 1). Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks. pp. 3–8. Archived from the original (PDF) on 30 September 2013. Laiou, Angeliki E. (2002b). "Exchange and Trade, Seventh-Twelfth Centuries". In Angeliki E. Laiou (ed.). The Economic History of Byzantium (Volume 2). Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks. pp. 697–770. Archived from the original on 30 September 2013. Laiou, Angeliki E.; Morisson, Cécile (2007). The Byzantine Economy. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-84978-4. Lapidge, Michael; Blair, John; Keynes, Simon (1998). The Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Anglo-Saxon England. Malden: Blackwell. ISBN 978-0-631-22492-1. Lenski, Noel (1999). "Assimilation and Revolt in the Territory of Isauria, From the 1st Century BC to the 6th Century AD". Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient. 42 (4): 413–65. doi:10.1163/1568520991201687. ISSN 0022-4995. JSTOR 3632602. Louth, Andrew (2005). "The Byzantine Empire in the Seventh Century". In Fouracre, Paul (ed.). The New Cambridge Medieval History, Volume 1, c.500–c.700. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 289–316. ISBN 9781139053938. Lowry, Heath W. (2003). The Nature of the Early Ottoman State. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. ISBN 978-0-7914-8726-6. Madden, Thomas F. (2005). Crusades: The Illustrated History. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. ISBN 978-0-472-03127-6. Magdalino, Paul (2002a). The Empire of Manuel I Komnenos, 1143–1180. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-52653-1. Magdalino, Paul (2002b). "Medieval Constantinople: Built Environment and Urban Development". In Angeliki E. Laiou (ed.). The Economic History of Byzantium (Volume 2). Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks. pp. 529–37. Archived from the original on 30 September 2013. Mango, Cyril A. (2007). Η Αυτοκρατορία της Νέας Ρώμης [Byzantium: The Empire of the New Rome] (in Greek). Translated by Dimitris Tsoungarakis. Athens: Educational Institution of the National Bank of Greece. Mango, Cyril A. (2002). The Oxford History of Byzantium. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-814098-6. Matschke, Klaus-Peter (2002). "Commerce, Trade, Markets, and Money: Thirteenth-Fifteenth Centuries". In Angeliki E. Laiou (ed.). The Economic History of Byzantium (Volume 2). Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks. pp. 771–806. Archived from the original on 30 September 2013. McDonnell, Myles Anthony (2006). Roman Manliness: Virtus and the Roman Republic. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-82788-1. Meier, William N. (2003). "Die Inszenierung einer Katastrophe: Justinian und der Nika-Aufstand". Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik. 142 (142): 273–300. JSTOR 20191600. Merryman, John Henry; Perez-Perdomo, Rogelio (2007). The Civil Law Tradition: An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Europe and Latin America. Stanford University Press. ISBN 978-0-8047-5569-6. Meyendorff, John (1982). The Byzantine Legacy in the Orthodox Church. Yonkers: St Vladimir's Seminary Press. ISBN 978-0-913836-90-3. Millar, Fergus (2006). A Greek Roman Empire: Power and Belief under Theodosius II (408–450). Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-24703-1. Miller, William (1907). "Monemvasia". The Journal of Hellenic Studies. 27: 229–301. doi:10.2307/624442. JSTOR 624442. Moravcsik, Gyula (1970). Byzantium and the Magyars. Amsterdam: Hakkert. Neumann, Iver B. (2006). "Sublime Diplomacy: Byzantine, Early Modern, Contemporary" (PDF). Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 34 (3): 865–88. doi:10.1177/03058298060340030201. ISSN 1569-2981. S2CID 144773343. Neville, Leonora Alice (2004). Authority in Byzantine Provincial Society, 950–1100. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-83865-8. Nicol, Donald M. (1993). The Last Centuries of Byzantium, 1261–1453 (Second ed.). London: Rupert Hart-Davis Ltd. ISBN 0-246-10559-3. Nicol, Donald M. (1996). The Reluctant Emperor: A Biography of John Cantacuzene, Byzantine Emperor and Monk, c. 1295–1383. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-52201-4. Norwich, John Julius (1998). A Short History of Byzantium. Ringwood, Vic.: Penguin. ISBN 978-0-14-025960-5. Norwich, John Julius (1982). A History of Venice. New York: Alfred A. Knopf Inc. ISBN 978-0-394-52410-8. Nystazopoulou-Pelekidou, Maria (1970). Συμβολή εις την χρονολόγησιν των Αβαρικών και Σλαβικών επιδρομών επί Μαυρικίου (582–602) (μετ' επιμέτρου περί των Περσικών πολέμων) [Contribution to the chronology of Avar and Slav raids during the reign of Maurice (582–602), with an excursus about the Persian Wars]. Byzantina Symmeikta (in Greek). 2: 145–206. doi:10.12681/byzsym.649. ISSN 1105-1639. Archived from the original on 27 June 2012. Retrieved 10 March 2012. Obolensky, Dimitri (1974) [1971]. The Byzantine Commonwealth: Eastern Europe, 500–1453. London: Cardinal. ISBN 978-0-351-17644-9. Obolensky, Dimitri (1994). Byzantium and the Slavs. Yonkers: St Vladimir's Seminary Press. ISBN 978-0-88141-008-2. Oikonomides, Nikos (1999). "L᾽"Unilinguisme" Officiel de Constantinople Byzantine". Byzantina Symmeikta. 13: 9–22. doi:10.12681/byzsym.857. ISSN 1105-1639. Ostrogorsky, George (1969). History of the Byzantine State. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press. ISBN 978-0-8135-1198-6. Ostrogorsky, George (1959). "The Byzantine Empire in the World of the Seventh Century" (PDF). Dumbarton Oaks Papers. 13: 1–21. doi:10.2307/1291127. JSTOR 1291126. S2CID 165376375. Paparrigopoulos, Constantine; Karolidis, Pavlos (1925). Ιστορία του Ελληνικού Έθνους [History of the Greek Nation] (in Greek). 4. Eleftheroudakis. Parry, Kenneth (1996). Depicting the Word: Byzantine Iconophile Thought of the Eighth and Ninth Centuries. Leiden and New York: Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-10502-7. Patterson, Gordon M. (1995) [1990]. The Essentials of Medieval History: 500 to 1450 AD, the Middle Ages. Piscataway: Research and Education Association. ISBN 978-0-87891-705-1. Perrottet, Tony (2004). The Naked Olympics: The True Story of the Ancient Games. Random House. ISBN 978-1-58836-382-4. Postan, Michael Moïssey; Miller, Edward; Postan, Cynthia (1987). The Cambridge Economic History of Europe (Volume 2). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-08709-4. Pounds, Norman John Greville (1979). An Historical Geography of Europe, 1500–1840. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-22379-9. Read, Piers Paul (2000) [1999]. The Templars: The Dramatic History of the Knights Templar, The Most Powerful Military Order of the Crusades. New York: St. Martin's Press. ISBN 978-0-312-26658-5. Reinert, Stephen W. (2002). "Fragmentation (1204–1453)". In Cyril Mango (ed.). The Oxford History of Byzantium. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. pp. 248–83. ISBN 978-0-19-814098-6. Rice, David Talbot (1968). Byzantine Art (3rd ed.). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books Limited. Robins, Robert Henry (1993). The Byzantine Grammarians: Their Place in History. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. ISBN 978-3-11-013574-9. Rosser, John H. (2011). "Introduction". Historical Dictionary of Byzantium. Lanham, MA: Scarecrow. ISBN 978-0-8108-7567-8. Runciman, Steven (1990). The Fall of Constantinople, 1453. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-39832-9. Runciman, Steven (2004). The Byzantine Theocracy. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-54591-4. Salaman, Rena (1986). "The Case of the Missing Fish, or Dolmathon Prolegomena". In Jaine, Tom (ed.). Oxford Symposium on Food & Cookery 1984 & 1985: Cookery: Science, Lore & Books: Proceedings (Introduction by Alan Davidson). London: Prospect Books Limited. pp. 184–87. ISBN 978-0-907325-16-1. Sarantis, Alexander (2009). "War and Diplomacy in Pannonia and the Northwest Balkans during the Reign of Justinian: The Gepid Threat and Imperial Responses". Dumbarton Oaks Papers. 63: 15–40. JSTOR 41219761. Sedlar, Jean W. (1994). East Central Europe in the Middle Ages, 1000–1500. III. Seattle: University of Washington Press. ISBN 978-0-295-97290-9. Seton-Watson, Hugh (1967). The Russian Empire, 1801–1917. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-822152-4. Sotinel, Claire (2005). "Emperors and Popes in the Sixth Century: The Western View". In Maas, Michael (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Justinian. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. pp. 267–90. ISBN 978-0-521-81746-2. Speck, Paul (1984). "Ikonoklasmus und die Anfänge der Makedonischen Renaissance". Poikila Byzantina. 4: 175–210. Stephenson, Paul (2000). Byzantium's Balkan Frontier: A Political Study of the Northern Balkans, 900–1204. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-77017-0. Tarasov, Oleg; Milner-Gulland, R.R. (2004). Icon and Devotion: Sacred Spaces in Imperial Russia. London: Reaktion. ISBN 978-1-86189-118-1. Tatakes, Vasileios N.; Moutafakis, Nicholas J. (2003). Byzantine Philosophy. Indianapolis: Hackett. ISBN 978-0-87220-563-5. Teall, John L. (1967). "The Age of Constantine Change and Continuity in Administration and Economy". Dumbarton Oaks Papers. 21: 11–36. doi:10.2307/1291256. JSTOR 1291256. Timberlake, Alan (2004). A Reference Grammar of Russian. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-77292-1. Treadgold, Warren (1995). Byzantium and Its Army, 284–1081. Stanford: Stanford University Press. ISBN 978-0-8047-2420-3. Treadgold, Warren (1997). A History of the Byzantine State and Society. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. ISBN 0-8047-2630-2. Troianos, Spyros; Velissaropoulou-Karakosta, Julia (1997). Ιστορία δικαίου από την αρχαία στην νεώτερη Ελλάδα [History of law from ancient to modern Greece] (in Greek). Athens: Sakkoulas. ISBN 978-960-232-594-0. Vasiliev, Alexander Alexandrovich (1928–1935). History of the Byzantine Empire. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press. ISBN 978-0-299-80925-6. Versteegh, Cornelis H.M. (1977). Greek Elements in Arabic Linguistic Thinking. Leiden: Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-04855-3. Vryonis, Speros (1971). The Decline of Medieval Hellenism in Asia Minor and the Process of Islamization from the Eleventh through the Fifteenth Century. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-01597-5. Watson, Bruce (1993). Sieges: A Comparative Study. Westport: Praeger. ISBN 978-0-275-94034-8. Weitzmann, Kurt (1982). The Icon. London: Evans Brothers. ISBN 978-0-237-45645-0. Wells, Herbert George (1922). A Short History of the World. New York: Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-06-492674-4. Whittow, Mark (1996). The Making of Byzantium, 600–1025. Berkeley and Los Angeles, California: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-20496-6. Wickham, Chris (2009). The Inheritance of Rome: A History of Europe from 400 to 1000. New York: Viking. ISBN 978-0-670-02098-0. Wolff, Robert Lee (1948). "Romania: The Latin Empire of Constantinople". Speculum. 23 (1): 1–34. doi:10.2307/2853672. JSTOR 2853672. Wroth, Warwick (1908). Catalogue of the Imperial Byzantine Coins in the British Museum. British Museum Dept. of Coins and Medals. ISBN 978-1-4021-8954-8. Further reading[edit] Ahrweiler, Hélène; Aymard, Maurice (2000). Les Européens. Paris: Hermann. ISBN 978-2-7056-6409-1. Angelov, Dimiter (2007). Imperial Ideology and Political Thought in Byzantium (1204–1330). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-85703-1. Baboula, Evanthia, Byzantium, in Muhammad in History, Thought, and Culture: An Encyclopedia of the Prophet of God (2 vols.), Edited by C. Fitzpatrick and A. Walker, Santa Barbara, ABC-CLIO, 2014. ISBN 1-61069-177-6. Evans, Helen C.; Wixom, William D (1997). The glory of Byzantium: art and culture of the Middle Byzantine era, A.D. 843–1261. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art. ISBN 978-0-8109-6507-2. Cameron, Averil (2014). Byzantine Matters. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-1-4008-5009-9. Duval, Ben (2019), Midway Through the Plunge: John Cantacuzenus and the Fall of Byzantium, Byzantine Emporia, LLC Haldon, John (2001). The Byzantine Wars: Battles and Campaigns of the Byzantine Era. Stroud, Gloucestershire: Tempus Publishing. ISBN 978-0-7524-1795-0. Haldon, John (2002). Byzantium: A History. Stroud, Gloucestershire: Tempus Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4051-3240-4. Haldon, John (2016). The Empire That Would Not Die: The Paradox of Eastern Roman Survival, 640–740. Harvard University. ISBN 978-0-674-08877-1. Harris, Jonathan. Constantinople: Capital of Byzantium. Bloomsbury, 2nd edition, 2017. ISBN 978-1-4742-5465-6. online review Harris, Jonathan (2015). The Lost World of Byzantium. New Haven CT and London: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-17857-9. Harris, Jonathan (2020). Introduction to Byzantium, 602–1453 (1st ed.). Routledge. ISBN 978-1-138-55643-0. Hussey, J.M. (1966). The Cambridge Medieval History. Vol. IV: The Byzantine Empire. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Moles Ian N., "Nationalism and Byzantine Greece", Greek Roman and Byzantine Studies, Duke University, pp. 95–107, 1969 Runciman, Steven (1966). Byzantine Civilisation. London: Edward Arnold Limited. ISBN 978-1-56619-574-4. Runciman, Steven (1990) [1929]. The Emperor Romanus Lecapenus and his Reign. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-06164-3. Stanković, Vlada, ed. (2016). The Balkans and the Byzantine World before and after the Captures of Constantinople, 1204 and 1453. Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books. ISBN 978-1-4985-1326-5. Stathakopoulos, Dionysios (2014). A Short History of the Byzantine Empire. London: I.B.Tauris. ISBN 978-1-78076-194-7. Thomas, John P. (1987). Private Religious Foundations in the Byzantine Empire. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks. ISBN 978-0-88402-164-3. Toynbee, Arnold Joseph (1972). Constantine Porphyrogenitus and His World. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-215253-4. External links[edit] Wikimedia Commons has media related to Byzantine Empire. Wikisource has original works on the topic: Byzantine Empire Look up Byzantine in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. Library resources about Byzantine Empire Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries Byzantine Empire on In Our Time at the BBC De Imperatoribus Romanis. Scholarly biographies of many Byzantine emperors. 12 Byzantine Rulers by Lars Brownworth of The Stony Brook School; audio lectures. NYTimes review. 18 centuries of Roman Empire by Howard Wiseman (Maps of the Roman/Byzantine Empire throughout its lifetime). Byzantine & Christian Museum Byzantine studies, resources and bibliography[edit] Fox, Clinton R. "What, If Anything, Is a Byzantine?" (Online Encyclopedia of Roman Emperors) Byzantine studies homepage at Dumbarton Oaks. Includes links to numerous electronic texts. Byzantium: Byzantine studies on the Internet. Links to various online resources. Translations from Byzantine Sources: The Imperial Centuries, c. 700–1204. Online sourcebook. De Re Militari. Resources for medieval history, including numerous translated sources on the Byzantine wars. Medieval Sourcebook: Byzantium. Numerous primary sources on Byzantine history. Bibliography on Byzantine Material Culture and Daily Life. Hosted by the University of Vienna; in English. Constantinople Home Page. Links to texts, images and videos on Byzantium. Byzantium in Crimea: Political History, Art and Culture. Institute for Byzantine Studies of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (with further resources and a repository with papers on various aspects of the Byzantine Empire) v t e Byzantine Empire topics History Preceding Roman Empire Dominate Early (330–717) Constantinian–Valentinianic era Constantinian dynasty Valentinianic dynasty Theodosian era Leonid era Justinian era Heraclian era "Byzantine Dark Ages" Twenty Years' Anarchy Middle (717–1204) Isaurian era Nikephorian era Amorian era Macedonian era Doukid era Komnenian era Angelid era Late (1204–1453) Sack of Constantinople Fourth Crusade Frankokratia Latin Empire Byzantine successor states (Nicaea / Epirus–Thessalonica / Morea / Trebizond) Palaiologan era Decline of the Byzantine Empire Fall of Constantinople By modern region or territory Albania Anatolia Armenia Bulgaria Corsica Crete Cyprus Dalmatia Egypt Greece Italy Sardinia Sicily Maghreb Malta Serbia Spain (Iberian Peninsula and Balearic Islands) Syria Thrace Governance Central Emperors Family tree Imperial bureaucracy Medieval Greek Senate Early Praetorian prefects Magister officiorum Comes sacrarum largitionum Comes rerum privatarum Quaestor sacri palatii Middle Logothetes tou dromou Sakellarios Logothetes tou genikou Logothetes tou stratiotikou Chartoularios tou sakelliou Chartoularios tou vestiariou Epi tou eidikou Protasekretis Epi ton deeseon Late Megas logothetes Mesazon Provincial Early Praetorian prefectures Dioceses Provinces Quaestura exercitus Exarchate of Ravenna Exarchate of Africa Middle Themata Kleisourai Bandon Catepanates Late Kephale Despotates Diplomacy Treaties Diplomats Roman–Iranian relations Military Army Battle tactics Battles Generals Mercenaries Military manuals Military units Revolts Wars Early Late Roman army East Roman army Foederati Bucellarii Scholae Palatinae Excubitors Middle Themata Kleisourai Tourma Droungos Bandon Tagmata Domestic of the Schools Hetaireia Akritai Varangian Guard Late Komnenian army Pronoia Vestiaritai Palaiologan army Allagion Paramonai Grand domestic Navy Karabisianoi Maritime themata Cibyrrhaeot Aegean Sea Samos Dromon Greek fire Droungarios of the Fleet Megas doux Admirals Naval battles Religion and law Religion Eastern Orthodoxy Byzantine Rite Hesychasm Patriarchate of Constantinople Saints Oriental Orthodoxy Alexandrian Rite Armenian Rite West Syriac Rite Miaphysitism Ecumenical councils Arianism Monophysitism Paulicianism Iconoclasm Great Schism Bogomilism Mount Athos Missionary activity Bulgaria Moravia Serbs Kievan Rus' Jews Law Codex Theodosianus Corpus Juris Civilis Code of Justinian Ecloga Basilika Hexabiblos Mutilation Culture and society Architecture Secular Sacred Cross-in-square Domes Constantinople Basilica Cistern Baths of Zeuxippus Blachernae Palace Chora Church City Walls Great Palace of Constantinople Hagia Irene Hagia Sophia Hippodrome Pammakaristos Church Prison of Anemas Thessalonica Arch of Galerius and Rotunda Byzantine Bath Hagia Sophia Hagios Demetrios Panagia Chalkeon Walls of Thessaloniki Ravenna San Vitale Sant'Apollinare in Classe Sant'Apollinare Nuovo Other locations Daphni Monastery Hosios Loukas Nea Moni of Chios Panagia Gorgoepikoos Saint Catherine's Monastery Mystras Art Icons Enamel Glass Mosaics Early Byzantine mosaics Painters Macedonian period art Komnenian renaissance Economy Agriculture Coinage Mints Trade silk Silk Road Varangians Dynatoi Literature Novel Acritic songs Digenes Akritas Alexander Romance Historians Everyday life Calendar Cities Cuisine Dance Dress Flags and insignia Gardens Music Lyra Octoechos People Byzantine Greeks Women Slavery Units of measurement Science Learning Encyclopedias Imperial Library Inventions Medicine Philosophy Rhetoric Scholars University University of Constantinople Impact Byzantine commonwealth Byzantine studies Museums Byzantinism Cyrillic script Neo-Byzantine architecture Greek scholars in the Renaissance Third Rome Megali Idea Byzantine Empire portal Links to related articles v t e Empires Ancient (Colonies) Akkadian Neo-Sumerian Old Babylonian Egyptian Old Kingdom Middle Kingdom New Kingdom Assyrian Neo-Babylonian Phoenician Carthaginian Chinese Shang Qin Han Three Kingdoms Jin North and South Hellenistic Macedonian Seleucid Hittite Indian Nanda Maurya Satavahana Shunga Gupta Harsha Iranian Median Achaemenid Parthian Sasanian Kushan Mongol Xianbei Roman Western Eastern Teotihuacan Post-classical Aksum Arab Rashidun Umayyad Abbasid Fatimid Córdoba Aragonese Angevin Aztec Benin Bornu Bruneian Bulgarian First Second Byzantine Nicaea Thessalonica Trebizond Calakmul Castilian Chinese Sui Tang Liao Song Jīn Yuan Uyghur Khaganate Ethiopian Zagwe Solomonic Genoese Georgian Holy-Roman Carolingian Huetar Hunnic Hephthalite Inca Indian Chola Gurjara-Pratihara Pala Eastern Ganga dynasty Delhi Vijayanagara Iranian Samanid Saffarid Kanem Khmer Latin Majapahit Malaccan Mali Mongol Yuan Golden Horde Chagatai Khanate Ilkhanate Moroccan Idrisid Almoravid Almohad Marinid North Sea Oyo Serbian Singhasari Somali Ajuran Ifatite Adalite Mogadishan Songhai Srivijaya Tibetan Tikal Timurid Tiwanku Toltec Turko-Persian Ghaznavid Great Seljuk Khwarezmian Venetian Vietnamese Dai Viet Wagadou Wari Modern Afghan Ashanti Austrian Austro-Hungarian Brazilian Central African Chinese Ming Qing China Manchukuo Ethiopian Haitian First Second French First Second German First/Old Reich Second Reich Third Reich Indian Mughal Mysorean Sikh Maratha British Raj Iranian Safavid Afsharid Qajar Pahlavi Japanese Johor Korean Mexican First Second Moroccan Saadi Alaouite Russian Somali Gobroon Majeerteen Hobyo Swedish Tongan Ottoman Vietnamese Dainam Vietnam Colonial American Belgian British English Scottish Danish Dutch French German Italian Japanese Omani Polish–Lithuanian Couronian Portuguese Sovereign Military Order of Malta Spanish Swedish Lists Empires largest in India Ancient great powers Medieval great powers Modern great powers European colonialism African empires Miscellaneous The empire on which the sun never sets "Empire" as a description of foreign policy American empire Soviet Empire v t e History of Anatolia v t e List of historic states of Italy Etruscan civilization Lega dei popoli Etruscan dodecapolis Ancient Rome Roman Kingdom (753 BC–509 BC) Roman Republic (509 BC–27 BC) Italy (4th/3rd century BC–476 AD) Sicilia (241 BC–476 AD) Corsica and Sardinia (238 BC–455 AD) Roman Empire (27 BC–395 AD) Western Roman Empire (285 AD–476 AD) Praetorian prefecture of Italy (337 AD–584 AD) Medieval and Early Modern states Early Italian Kingdom (476–774) Odoacer's rule (476–493) Ostrogothic rule (493–553) Vandal rule (435–534) Lombard rule (568–774) Duchy of Benevento Duchy of Friuli Duchy of Ivrea Duchy of Spoleto Duchy of Tridentum Byzantine Empire (584–751) Exarchate of Ravenna (584–751) Duchy of Rome (533–751) Duchy of Perugia (554–752) Duchy of the Pentapolis (554–752) Exarchate of Africa (585–698) Holy Roman Empire and other independent states Bishopric of Bressanone City of Fiume and its District Commune of Rome County of Gorizia Princely County of Gorizia and Gradisca County of Guastalla Duchy of Guastalla Kingdom of Italy Ancona Ceva Finale March of Friuli Patria del Friuli (Patriarchate of Aquileia) Ivrea Istria Mantua Milan March of Montferrat Duchy of Montferrat Tyrol Trieste Turin Tuscany Verona Duchy of Ivrea Duchy of Mantua Duchy of Massa and Carrara Duchy of Merania Duchy of Mirandola Duchy of Modena and Reggio Principality of Piombino Duchy of Reggio Marquisate of Saluzzo Duchy of Spoleto Bishopric of Tarantasia Bishopric of Trento Grand Duchy of Tuscany Papal States (754–1870) Duchy of Castro Duchy of Ferrara Holy See Duchy of Parma Duchy of Urbino Republics Republic of Cospaia Republic of Ancona Republic of Florence Republic of Genoa Republic of Noli Republic of Lucca Republic of Massa Republic of Pisa Republic of Siena Republic of Venice (697–1797) Dogado Domini di Terraferma Stato da Màr Southern Italy (774–1139) Byzantine Duchy of Amalfi Duchy of Gaeta Catepanate of Italy Longobardia Theme of Lucania Duchy of Naples Theme of Sicily and Byzantine Sicily Duchy of Sorrento Arab Emirate of Bari Emirate of Sicily Lombard Principality of Benevento Principality of Salerno Principality of Capua Norman County of Apulia and Calabria County of Aversa County of Sicily Principality of Taranto Sardinia and Corsica (9th century–1420) Judicates Agugliastra Arborea Cagliari Gallura Logudoro Oristano Republic of Sassari Kingdom of Sardinia and Corsica Corsican Republic (1755–1769) Kingdom of Sicily (1130–1816) and Kingdom of Naples (1282–1816) State of the Presidi Duke of San Donato Duchy of Sora Principality of Taranto Terra Sancti Benedicti Neapolitan Republic (1647–1648) Hospitaller Malta Gozo Malta Protectorate Crown Colony of Malta Savoy and the Savoyard state (from the 10th century) Savoy County of Savoy County of Maurienne County of Geneva Duchy of Chablais Barony of Faucigny Piedmont Duchy of Aosta County of Nice County of Tenda Sicily (1713–1720) Sardinia (1720–1861) French Revolutionary and Napoleonic eras (1792–1815) Republics Cisalpinia Cispadania Italy Liguria Lucca Parthenopea Piedmont Rome Subalpinia Transpadania Monarchies Benevento Etruria Guastalla Italy Lucca and Piombino Massa and Carrara Naples Pontecorvo Tuscany Elba Corsica Post-Napoleonic states Duchy of Genoa (1815–1848) Duchy of Lucca (1815–1847) Duchy of Massa and Carrara (1814–1829) Duchy of Modena and Reggio (1814–1859) Duchy of Parma (1814–1859) Grand Duchy of Tuscany (1815–1859) Italian United Provinces (1831) Provisional Government of Milan (1848) Republic of San Marco (1848–1849) Roman Republic (1849) United Provinces of Central Italy (1859–1860) Kingdom of Sardinia (1814–1860) Kingdom of the Two Sicilies (1816–1861) Kingdom of Lombardy–Venetia (1815–1866) Papal States (1814–1870) Post-unification Kingdom of Italy (1861–1946) Julian March Italian Empire (1882–1960) Free State of Fiume (1920–1924) Italian Social Republic (1943–1945) Free Territory of Trieste (1947–1954) v t e Ancient Syria and Mesopotamia Syria Northern Mesopotamia Southern Mesopotamia c. 3500–2350 BCE Semitic nomads Sumerian city-states c. 2350–2200 BCE Akkadian Empire c. 2200–2100 BCE Gutians c. 2100–2000 BCE Third Dynasty of Ur (Sumerian Renaissance) c. 2000–1800 BCE Mari and other Amorite city-states Old Assyrian Empire (Northern Akkadians) Isin/Larsa and other Amorite city-states c. 1800–1600 BCE Old Hittite Kingdom Old Babylonian Empire (Southern Akkadians) c. 1600–1400 BCE Mitanni (Hurrians) Karduniaš (Kassites) c. 1400–1200 BCE Middle Hittite Kingdom Middle Assyria c. 1200–1150 BCE Bronze Age Collapse ("Sea Peoples") Arameans c. 1150–911 BCE Phoenicia Neo-Hittite city-states Aram- Damascus Arameans Middle Babylonia Chal- de- ans 911–729 BCE Neo-Assyrian Empire 729–609 BCE 626–539 BCE Neo-Babylonian Empire (Chaldeans) 539–331 BCE Achaemenid Empire 336–301 BCE Macedonian Empire (Ancient Greeks and Macedonians) 311–129 BCE Seleucid Empire 129–63 BCE Seleucid Empire Parthian Empire 63 BCE–243 CE Roman Empire/Byzantine Empire (Syria) 243–636 CE Sassanid Empire v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films v t e History of Europe Prehistory Paleolithic Europe Neolithic Europe Bronze Age Europe Iron Age Europe Classical antiquity Classical Greece Roman Republic Hellenistic period Roman Empire Early Christianity Christianity in late antiquity Crisis of the Third Century Fall of the Western Roman Empire Late antiquity Middle Ages Early Middle Ages Migration Period Christianity in the Middle Ages Christianization Francia Byzantine Empire Papal States Bulgarian Empire First Second Maritime republics Venice Genoa Pisa Amalfi Viking Age Kievan Rus' Crown of Aragon Holy Roman Empire High Middle Ages Republic of Florence Feudalism Crusades Mongol invasion Serbian Empire Late Middle Ages Black Death Hundred Years' War Kalmar Union Early modern Renaissance Christianity in the modern era Reformation Age of Discovery Baroque Grand Duchy of Tuscany Thirty Years' War Absolute monarchy Ottoman Empire Portuguese Empire Spanish Empire Early modern France Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth Cossack Hetmanate Swedish Empire Dutch Republic British Empire Habsburg Monarchy Russian Empire Age of Enlightenment Modern Great Divergence Industrial Revolution French Revolution Napoleonic Wars Nationalism Revolutions of 1848 World War I Russian Revolution Interwar period World War II Cold War European integration COVID-19 pandemic See also Art of Europe Genetic history of Europe History of Christianity History of the Mediterranean region History of the European Union History of Western civilization Maritime history of Europe Military history of Europe Authority control GND: 4009256-2 HDS: 029476 LCCN: n80085269 NDL: 00560706 NKC: ge131496 VIAF: 144245245 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n80085269 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Byzantine_Empire&oldid=995891115" Categories: Byzantine Empire 286 establishments 330s establishments 1453 disestablishments in Europe 1453 disestablishments in Asia States and territories established in the 390s States and territories disestablished in 1453 Christian states Former countries in the Balkans Former countries in the Middle East Former theocracies Hidden categories: Harv and Sfn no-target errors Webarchive template wayback links Pages using the EasyTimeline extension Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata Use dmy dates from November 2020 EngvarB from July 2019 Articles containing Ancient Greek (to 1453)-language text Articles containing Latin-language text Pages using infobox country or infobox former country with the flag caption or type parameters Pages using infobox country or infobox former country with the symbol caption or type parameters Articles containing Medieval Greek-language text Articles containing Greek-language text CS1 uses Greek-language script (el) CS1 Greek-language sources (el) CS1 German-language sources (de) Commons link from Wikidata Featured articles Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with HDS identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with NDL identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikiquote Languages Afrikaans Alemannisch አማርኛ العربية Aragonés Արեւմտահայերէն Armãneashti Asturianu Azərbaycanca تۆرکجه বাংলা Bân-lâm-gú Башҡортса Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ Български Bosanski Brezhoneg Буряад Català Чӑвашла Cebuano Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Fiji Hindi Føroyskt Français Frysk Gaeilge Gàidhlig Galego 客家語/Hak-kâ-ngî 한국어 Hausa Հայերեն हिन्दी Hornjoserbsce Hrvatski Ido Ilokano Bahasa Indonesia Interlingua Ирон Íslenska Italiano עברית Jawa Kabɩyɛ ಕನ್ನಡ ქართული Қазақша Kiswahili Kriyòl gwiyannen Kurdî Кыргызча Ladin Ladino لۊری شومالی Latina Latviešu Лезги Lietuvių Limburgs Lingua Franca Nova Lumbaart Magyar Македонски Malagasy മലയാളം Malti मराठी მარგალური مصرى مازِرونی Bahasa Melayu Mirandés Монгол မြန်မာဘာသာ Nederlands Nedersaksies नेपाल भाषा 日本語 Napulitano Нохчийн Nordfriisk Norsk bokmål Norsk nynorsk Occitan Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча ਪੰਜਾਬੀ پنجابی Patois Picard Piemontèis Plattdüütsch Polski Ποντιακά Português Qırımtatarca Română Rumantsch Русиньскый Русский Саха тыла Sardu Scots Shqip Sicilianu Simple English سنڌي Slovenčina Slovenščina کوردی Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Tagalog தமிழ் Tarandíne Татарча/tatarça ไทย Тоҷикӣ Türkçe Türkmençe Українська اردو Vèneto Vepsän kel’ Tiếng Việt Võro 文言 West-Vlams Winaray 吴语 ייִדיש Yorùbá 粵語 Zazaki Zeêuws Žemaitėška 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 23 December 2020, at 12:51 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1708 ---- File:Fedor Bronnikov 014.jpg - Wikipedia File:Fedor Bronnikov 014.jpg From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search File File history File usage Global file usage Size of this preview: 800 × 455 pixels. Other resolutions: 320 × 182 pixels | 640 × 364 pixels | 1,000 × 569 pixels. Original file ‎(1,000 × 569 pixels, file size: 135 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg) This is a file from the Wikimedia Commons. Information from its description page there is shown below. Commons is a freely licensed media file repository. You can help. Summary Author Fyodor Bronnikov  (1827–1902)   Alternative names Feodor Andrejewitsch Bronnikoff; Fedor Andreevich Bronnikov Description Russian painter and watercolorist Date of birth/death 17 September 1827 (in Julian calendar)  1 September 1902 (in Julian calendar)  Location of birth/death Shadrinsk Anticoli Corrado Authority control : Q4097027 VIAF: 56884021 ISNI: 0000 0000 6663 0321 ULAN: 500045176 LCCN: no2014087084 GND: 129034843 WorldCat author QS:P170,Q4097027 Description Horatius reads before Maecenaslabel QS:Len,"Horatius reads before Maecenas" label QS:Lfr,"Horace lit ses poèmes devant Mécène" label QS:Lru,"Федор Бронников. Гораций читает свои сатиры меценату." Date 1863date QS:P571,+1863-00-00T00:00:00Z/9 Medium painting Collection Odessa Art Museum    Native name Ukrainian: Одеський художній музей Location Odessa , Ukraine Coordinates 46° 29′ 36.24″ N, 30° 43′ 43.68″ E   Established 1899 Web page ofam.od.ua Authority control : Q4331480 VIAF: 133233459 ISNI: 0000 0001 2286 8052 LCCN: n81144006 WorldCat institution QS:P195,Q4331480 Source/Photographer http://artpoisk.info/artist/bronnikov_fedor_andreevich_1827/goraciy_chitaet_svoi_satiry_mecenatu/ Licensing This is a faithful photographic reproduction of a two-dimensional, public domain work of art. The work of art itself is in the public domain for the following reason: Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse This work is in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 100 years or fewer. You must also include a United States public domain tag to indicate why this work is in the public domain in the United States. This file has been identified as being free of known restrictions under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights. https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/PDMCreative Commons Public Domain Mark 1.0falsefalse The official position taken by the Wikimedia Foundation is that "faithful reproductions of two-dimensional public domain works of art are public domain". This photographic reproduction is therefore also considered to be in the public domain in the United States. In other jurisdictions, re-use of this content may be restricted; see Reuse of PD-Art photographs for details. File history Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time. Date/Time Thumbnail Dimensions User Comment current 13:24, 31 March 2010 1,000 × 569 (135 KB) Shakko {{Information |Description={{ru|Гораций читает свои сатиры меценату. 1863}}{{en|Horatius reads before Maecenas}} |Source=http://etnaa.mylivepage.ru/image/411/12072_Гораций_читает_свои_сатиры_меце� File usage The following pages on the English Wikipedia use this file (pages on other projects are not listed): Decorum Horace User:Mulief/Gather lists/23201 – Born on 27 Global file usage The following other wikis use this file: Usage on bg.wikipedia.org Фьодор Бронников Usage on de.wikipedia.org Kulturförderung Usage on en.wikiquote.org Horace John Conington Decorum Usage on es.wikipedia.org Historia intelectual Usage on eu.wikipedia.org Horazio Usage on fi.wikipedia.org Horatius Usage on fr.wikipedia.org 38 av. J.-C. Convenable Utilisateur:Ahemes/Odessa Usage on he.wikipedia.org גאיוס קילניוס מאיקנס Usage on it.wikipedia.org Lucio Vario Rufo Comunicazione letteraria nell'antica Roma Augusto Storia della letteratura latina (31 a.C. - 14 d.C.) Politica interna di Augusto Decorum Usage on ru.wikipedia.org Гораций Decorum Usage on tr.wikiquote.org Horatius Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Fedor_Bronnikov_014.jpg" Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces File Talk Variants Views Read View on Commons More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Upload file Special pages Printable version Page information Languages Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1721 ---- Roman finance - Wikipedia Roman finance From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Roman finance" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (September 2008) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) The practices of Ancient Roman finance, while originally rooted in Greek models, evolved in the second century BCE with the expansion of Roman monetization. Roman elites engaged in private lending for various purposes, and various banking models arose to serve different lending needs.[1] Contents 1 Private finance 1.1 Pooling capital 1.2 Private loans 1.3 Deferred payment 2 Public finance 3 See also 4 References 5 Further reading Private finance[edit] Pooling capital[edit] Before banks were established in Rome there was little ability to mobilize large amounts of capital, leaving Romans to operate within the constraints of the wealth of their households. When household wealth was exhausted, the elites in Roman society would often extend loans amongst themselves.[2] The value of these loans to the lender was not always derived from interest payments, but rather from the social obligations that were an implication of being a lender.[3][4] The formation of societas allowed for the utilization of pooled capital. Societas were groups who could combine their resources to place a bid for a government contract and then share in the resulting profit or loss.[2][5] The publicani (public contractors) were an early incarnation of societas who would bid for the right to collect taxes from the Roman provinces. Senators were not allowed to engage in trade, so it fell to the knights (equites) to bid on these contracts issued by the censors every five years.[6] Banks were established in Rome that modeled their Greek counterparts and introduced formalized financial intermediation. Livy is the first writer to acknowledge the rise of formal Roman banks in 310 BCE.[7] Ancient Roman banks operated under private law, which did not have clear guidance on how to decide cases concerning financial matters, which forced Roman banks to operate entirely on their word and character. Bankers congregated around the arch of Janus to conduct their business and despite their informal location, were clearly professional in their dealings.[8][9] Private loans[edit] Up until the dawn of the empire, it was common for loans to be negotiated as oral contracts. In the early empire, lenders and borrowers began to adopt the usage of a chirographum (“handwritten record”) to record these contracts and use them for evidence of the agreed terms.[10] One copy of the contract was presented on the exterior of the chirographum, while a second copy was kept sealed within two waxed tablets of the document in the presence of a witness.[10][11] Informal methods of maintaining records of loans made and received existed, as well as formal incarnations adopted by frequent lenders. These serial lenders used a kalendarium to document the loans that they issued to assist in tabulating interest accrued at the beginning of each month (Kalends).[12] Parties to contracts were supposed to be Roman citizens, but there is evidence of this boundary being broken.[12] Loans to citizens were also originated from public or governmental positions. For example, the Temple of Apollo is believed to have engaged in secured loans with citizens’ homes being used as collateral.[13] Loans were more rarely extended to citizens from the government, as in the case of Tiberius who allowed for three-year, interest-free loans to be issued to senators in order to avert a looming credit crisis.[14] Deferred payment[edit] There is sufficient evidence of deferred payments and financing arrangements to be negotiated for large purchases. Deferred payments were used in the auction of wine or oil that was “on the tree” (not yet harvested or produced), requiring payment from the winning bidder long after the auction had ended. Roman peasants who needed money to pay their taxes would use an inverted form of this process by selling the right to a portion of their harvest in the future in exchange for cash in the present.[15] The Sulpicii arose as professional bankers in the first century AD, and among other forms of financial intermediation, they offered financing for speculators in grain markets.[2][5] Public finance[edit] For centuries the monetary affairs of the Roman Republic had rested in the hands of the Senate. These elite liked to present themselves as steady and fiscally conservative, but as the 19th-century historian of Rome Wilhelm Ihne remarked: Though individually the Romans were exceedingly economical and careful in the management of their private property, the state as such was extravagant and careless with the state revenue. It was found impossible to protect the public property from being plundered by private individuals, and the feeling of powerlessness resulted in reckless indifference. It was felt that revenues which could not be preserved intact and devoted to the common good were of no value to the state and might as well be abandoned.[16] The aerarium (state treasury) was supervised by members of the government rising in power and prestige, the Quaestors, Praetors, and eventually the Prefects. With the dawn of the Roman Empire, a major change took place, as the emperors assumed the reins of financial control. Augustus adopted a system that was, on the surface, fair to the Senate. Just as the world was divided in provinces designated as imperial or senatorial, so was the treasury. All tribute brought in from senatorially controlled provinces was given to the aerarium, while that of the imperial territories went to the treasury of the emperor, the fiscus. Initially, this process of distribution seemed to work, although the legal technicality did not disguise the supremacy of the emperor or his often used right to transfer funds back and forth regularly from the aerarium to the fiscus. The fiscus actually took shape after the reign of Augustus and Tiberius. It began as a private fund (fiscus meaning purse or basket) but grew to include all imperial monies, not only the private estates but also all public lands and finances under the imperial eye. The property of the rulers grew to such an extent that changes had to be made starting sometime in the 3rd century, most certainly under Septimius Severus. Henceforth the imperial treasury was divided. The fiscus was retained to handle actual government revenue, while a patrimonium was created to hold the private fortune, the inheritance of the royal house. There is a considerable question as to the exact nature of this evaluation, involving possibly a res privata so common in the Late Empire. Just as the Senate had its own finance officers, so did the emperors. The head of the fiscus in the first years was the rationalis, originally a freedman due to Augustus' desire to place the office in the hands of a servant free of the class demands of the traditional society. In succeeding years the corruption and reputation of the freedman forced new and more reliable administrators. From the time of Hadrian (117-138), any rationalis hailed from the Equestrian Order (equites) and remained so through the chaos of the 3rd century and into the age of Diocletian. With Diocletian came a series of massive reforms, and total control over the finances of the Empire fell to the now stronger central government. Tax reforms made possible a real budget in the modern sense for the first time. Previously it had issued the tax demands to the cities and allowed them to allocate the burden. From now on the imperial government driven by fiscal needs dictated the entire process down to the civic level. Under Constantine this aggrandizement continued with the emergence of an appointed minister of finance, the comes sacrarum largitionum (count of the sacred largesses). He maintained the general treasury and the intake of all revenue until Constantine divided the treasury into three giving the prefect, count and the manager of the res privata their own treasuries. The treasury of the prefect was called the 'arca.' His powers were directed toward control of the new sacrum aerarium, the result of the combination of the aerarium and the fiscus. The comes sacrarum largitionum was a figure of tremendous influence. He was responsible for all money taxes, examined banks, ran the mints and mines everywhere, weaving mills and dye works, paid the salaries and expenses of many departments of the state, the upkeep of imperial palaces and other public buildings, supplied the Courts with clothing and other items. To accomplish these many tasks, he was aided by a large central staff, a regional field force and small staffs in larger cities and towns. Just below the comes sacrarum were the rationales, comptrollers, positioned in each diocese. They supervised the collection of all tribute, taxes, or fees. They were everywhere and omnipotent until Constantine demoted them after his reorganization of the palatine level ministries' competencies in the years 325-326 by restricting their activity to supervision of the collection of taxes collected in gold and silver performed by the governors under the general supervision of the vicars. The rationales lost the last of their provincial field force of procurators between 330-337. Only the praetorian prefects were more powerful. His office, as vice-regent to the emperors, took precedence over all other civilian officials and military officers. They were chief finance officers of the empire. They composed the global budget and set the tax rates across the board. Before Constantine's reforms they were directly responsible for the supply of the army, the Annona militaris which was a separate tax form the time of Diocletian in place of arbitrary requsititions. The Annona civilis, the general in kind taxes were turned over to the prefects alone. To their care was entrusted the supply of food stuffs to the capitals, the imperial armament factories, the maintenance of the state post. The magister officiorum who was a kind of Minister of the Interior and State Security and the comes rerum privatarum could counter the political the comes sacrarum largitionum. The magister officiorum (master of offices) made all the major decisions concerning intelligence matters was not a fiscal officer and could not interfere with the operation of the sacrae largitiones and the res privata. The comes sacrarum largitionum gradually lost power to the prefects as more and more in kind taxes of his department were converted to gold. By the 5th century their diocesan level staff were no longer of much importance, although they continued in their duties. However the heads of the office continued to have power into the 430s in part because appellate jurisdiction in fiscal cases had been returned to them in 385. The imperial estates and holdings were huge. They res privata was directly under the management of the RP. The patromonium', or imperial inheritance were lands leased to indivivuals. Both were under the jurisdiction of the comes rerum privatarum. In the West the rents and tax income was shared with the sacrae largitionum but not in the East. In the East the palace administration took over gradually post-450 and the RP was finally dissolved by Justinian's successors. See also[edit] Agentes in rebus Comes Congiarium Donativum Fiscus Rationibus Roman commerce Roman economy References[edit] ^ Walter Scheidel (8 November 2012). "13: Money and Finance". The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Economy. Cambridge University Press. pp. 266–282. ISBN 978-1-107-49556-2. ^ a b c Holleran, Claire (2008-01-01). Jones, D. (ed.). "Roman Finance". The Classical Review. 58 (2): 538–539. doi:10.1017/s0009840x08001054. JSTOR 20482578. ^ Temin, Peter (2013). The Roman Market Economy. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. p. 168. ISBN 978-0-691-14768-0. ^ Scheidel, Walter (2012-11-08). The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Economy. Cambridge University Press. p. 279. ISBN 9781107495562. ^ a b Scheidel, Walter (2012-11-08). The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Economy. Cambridge University Press. p. 281. ISBN 9781107495562. ^ Wilhelm Ihne (1882). The History of Rome. Longmans, Green, and Company. pp. 158–159. ^ Temin 2013, p. 177 ^ Temin 2013, p. 176 ^ Scheidel, Walter (2012). Cambridge Companion to the Roman Economy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. p. 280. ISBN 978-0-521-89822-5. ^ a b Temin 2013, p. 168 ^ Scheidel, Walter (2012-11-08). The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Economy. Cambridge University Press. pp. 277–278. ISBN 9781107495562. ^ a b Temin 2013, p. 169 ^ Temin 2013, p. 178 ^ Temin 2013, p. 175 ^ Temin 2013, p. 171 ^ Wilhelm Ihne, The History of Rome (London, 1884), vol. 4, p. 156, full text online. Further reading[edit] Jean Andreau: Banking and Business in the Roman World, translated by Janet Lloyd (Cambridge University Press, 1999). Limited preview online. v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Roman_finance&oldid=993595642" Categories: Economy of ancient Rome Economic history of Italy Finance in Italy Hidden categories: Articles needing additional references from September 2008 All articles needing additional references Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Українська Edit links This page was last edited on 11 December 2020, at 12:45 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1726 ---- Category:Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers - Wikipedia Help Category:Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search This category is for articles with VcBA identifiers. Please do not add subcategories. For more information, see Wikipedia:Authority control. Administrators: Please do not delete this category even if it is empty! This category may be empty occasionally or even most of the time. This is a maintenance category, used for maintenance of the Wikipedia project. It is not part of the encyclopedia and contains non-article pages, or groups articles by status rather than subject. Do not include this category in content categories. This is a tracking category. It builds and maintains a list of pages primarily for the sake of the list itself. They are not part of the encyclopedia's categorization scheme. This category is hidden on its member pages—unless the corresponding user preference (appearance → show hidden categories) is set. These categories are used to track, build and organize lists of pages needing "attention en masse" (for example, pages using deprecated syntax), or that may need to be edited at someone's earliest convenience. These categories also serve to aggregate members of several lists or sub-categories into a larger, more efficient list (discriminated by classifications). Contents: Top 0–9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z * # 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 • A Aa Ae Aj Ao At • B Ba Be Bj Bo Bt • C Ca Ce Cj Co Ct • D Da De Dj Do Dt • E Ea Ee Ej Eo Et • F Fa Fe Fj Fo Ft • G Ga Ge Gj Go Gt • H Ha He Hj Ho Ht • I Ia Ie Ij Io It • J Ja Je Jj Jo Jt • K Ka Ke Kj Ko Kt • L La Le Lj Lo Lt • M Ma Me Mj Mo Mt • N Na Ne Nj No Nt • O Oa Oe Oj Oo Ot • P Pa Pe Pj Po Pt • Q Qa Qe Qj Qo Qt • R Ra Re Rj Ro Rt • S Sa Se Sj So St • T Ta Te Tj To Tt • U Ua Ue Uj Uo Ut • V Va Ve Vj Vo Vt • W Wa We Wj Wo Wt • X Xa Xe Xj Xo Xt • Y Ya Ye Yj Yo Yt • Z Za Ze Zj Zo Zt Pages in this category should only be added by Module:Authority control. Pages in category "Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers" The following 200 pages are in this category, out of approximately 38,752 total. This list may not reflect recent changes (learn more). (previous page) (next page)A Abraham Jacob van der Aa Pieter van der Aa Asger Aaboe Hans von Aachen Roman Catholic Diocese of Aachen Aachener Domchor Sven Aggesen Piet Aalberse Sr. Alvar Aalto Pentti Aalto Hans Aanrud Antti Aarne Aaron Aaron ben Jacob ha-Kohen Aaron ben Moses ben Asher Kristian Birch-Reichenwald Aars Francis van Aarssens Ramon d'Abadal i de Vinyals Vasily Abaev Magdalena Abakanowicz Pedro Pablo Abarca de Bolea, 10th Count of Aranda José Fernando de Abascal y Sousa Salvador Abascal Annibale degli Abati Olivieri Antonio Abati Firmin Abauzit Gustav Abb Giuseppe Cesare Abba Mostafa El-Abbadi Antoine Thomson d'Abbadie Arnaud-Michel d'Abbadie Jakob Abbadie Nicola Abbagnano Abbas II of Egypt Antonio Maria Abbatini Guido Ubaldo Abbatini Jean Baptiste Abbeloos Louise Abbéma Leon Abbett Abbey library of Saint Gall Abbey of Santo Domingo de Silos John Roland Abbey Filippo Abbiati Francesco Maria Abbiati Franco Abbiati Abbo Cernuus Abbo of Fleury Charles Greeley Abbot Ezra Abbot Robert Abbot (bishop) Eleanor Hallowell Abbott John Stevens Cabot Abbott John White Abbott Lyman Abbott Nabia Abbott Thomas Kingsmill Abbott Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab Abd al-Fattah Fumani Abd al-Ghani al-Nabulsi Abd al-Jabbar ibn Ahmad Abd al-Malik ibn Marwan Mustafa 'Abd al-Raziq Jean Mohamed Ben Abdeljlil Mohamed Ben Ahmed Abdelghani Emir Abdelkader Muhammad Abduh Abdul Hamid I Abdulmejid I Arthur William à Beckett Gilbert Abbott à Beckett Abel Jean-Pierre Abel-Rémusat Carl Abel Félix-Marie Abel Friedrich Gottfried Abel Heinrich Friedrich Otto Abel Sigurd Abel Wilhelm Abel Giovanni Francesco Abela Peter Abelard Johann Philipp Abelin André Abellon Louis Abelly Jacob Abendana Walter Abendroth Haly Abenragel Adolf Aber Abercius of Hieropolis John Hamilton, 1st Marquess of Abercorn John Abercrombie (physician) Lascelles Abercrombie David Abercromby Ralph Abercromby (meteorologist) Aberdeen Art Gallery George Hamilton-Gordon, 4th Earl of Aberdeen William Nevill, 1st Marquess of Abergavenny John Abernethy (surgeon) Anna Amalie Abert Hermann Abert Joseph Friedrich Abert Giorgio Abetti Abhishiktananda Johann Heinrich Abicht Abingdon Abbey Ablabius (consul) Nicolas Perrot d'Ablancourt Immanuel Aboab Antonio Abondio Edmond François Valentin About Charles François d'Abra de Raconis Abraham Abraham III of Armenia Abraham ben David Abraham Petros I Ardzivian Abraham the Great of Kashkar Gerald Abraham Roy Clive Abraham Władysław Abraham Israel Abrahams Peter Abrahams Nicholas Abram Dmitry Abramovich Lesley Abrams Chimen Abramsky Laure Junot, Duchess of Abrantès Isaac Abarbanel Judah Leon Abravanel Friedrich Ludwig Abresch Casimiro de Abreu Capistrano de Abreu Santos Abril y Castelló Absalom Laurentius Abstemius Abu al-Barakat al-Nasafi Abu al-Salt Abu Bakr bin Yahya al-Suli Abu Bishr Matta ibn Yunus Abu Firas al-Hamdani Abu Hafs Umar al-Nasafi Abu Hayyan al-Gharnati Abu Ishaq al-Shirazi Abu Mansur al-Maturidi Abu Mansur Mauhub al-Jawaliqi Abu Mikhnaf Abu Nasr as-Sarraj Abu Nu'aym al-Isfahani Ibn al-Jawzi Theodore Abu Qurrah Anna Abulafia David Abulafia Abulfeda Abundius Acacius of Constantinople Acacius of Caesarea Académie de Marseille Académie des Beaux-Arts Académie Française Académie nationale de chirurgie Académie Nationale de Médecine Académie royale de langue et de littérature françaises de Belgique Academy of Athens (modern) Accademia della Crusca Accademia di Belle Arti di Bologna Accademia di San Luca Accademia Ligustica di Belle Arti Accademia Musicale Chigiana Enrico Accatino Torquato Accetto Donato Acciaioli Zanobi Acciaioli Filippo Acciaiuoli Niccolò Acciaioli Lucius Accius Benedetto Accolti the Elder Bernardo Accolti Benedetto Accolti the Younger Francesco Accolti Giuseppe Accoramboni Vittoria Accoramboni Agostino Accorimboni Mariangelo Accorso Felice Accrocca Friedrich Accum Franciscus Accursius Giuseppe Acerbi Giacomo Acerbo Achaeus of Eretria Achard of Saint Victor Claude-François Achard Franz Karl Achard Guy Achard Louis Amédée Achard Elisabeth Achelis Andreas Achenbach Oswald Achenbach Gottfried Achenwall Luc d'Achery Achilles Painter Achilles Tatius Alessandro Achillini (previous page) (next page) Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Wikipedia_articles_with_VcBA_identifiers&oldid=977375622" Categories: Pages with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with authority control information Hidden categories: Hidden categories Tracking categories Template Large category TOC via CatAutoTOC on category with over 20,000 pages CatAutoTOC generates Large category TOC Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Category Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Ilokano עברית 日本語 Edit links This page was last edited on 8 September 2020, at 13:26 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1743 ---- Ancient Greek literature - Wikipedia Ancient Greek literature From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia   (Redirected from Hellenistic poetry) Jump to navigation Jump to search A Greek manuscript of the beginning of Hesiod's Works and Days Ancient Greek literature is literature written in the Ancient Greek language from the earliest texts until the time of the Byzantine Empire. The earliest surviving works of ancient Greek literature, dating back to the early Archaic period, are the two epic poems The Iliad and The Odyssey, set in an idealized archaic past today identified as having some relation to the Mycenaean era. These two epics, along with the Homeric Hymns and the two poems of Hesiod, Theogony and Works and Days, comprised the major foundations of the Greek literary tradition that would continue into the Classical, Hellenistic, and Roman periods. The lyric poets Sappho, Alcaeus, and Pindar were highly influential during the early development of the Greek poetic tradition. Aeschylus is the earliest Greek tragic playwright for whom any plays have survived complete. Sophocles is famous for his tragedies about Oedipus, particularly Oedipus the King and Antigone. Euripides is known for his plays which often pushed the boundaries of the tragic genre. The comedic playwright Aristophanes wrote in the genre of Old Comedy, while the later playwright Menander was an early pioneer of New Comedy. The historians Herodotus of Halicarnassus and Thucydides, who both lived during the sixth century BC, wrote accounts of events that happened shortly before and during their own lifetimes. The philosopher Plato wrote dialogues, usually centered around his teacher Socrates, dealing with various philosophical subjects, whereas his student Aristotle wrote numerous treatises, which later became highly influential. Important later writers included Apollonius of Rhodes, who wrote The Argonautica, an epic poem about the voyage of the Argonauts; Archimedes, who wrote groundbreaking mathematical treatises; and Plutarch, who wrote mainly biographies and essays. The second-century AD writer [ Contents 1 Pre-classical and classical antiquity 1.1 Epic poetry 1.2 Lyric poetry 1.3 Drama 1.4 Historiography 1.5 Philosophy 2 Hellenistic period 2.1 Poetry 2.2 Drama 2.3 Historiography 2.4 Ancient Biography 2.5 Science and mathematics 2.6 Prose fiction 3 Roman period 3.1 Poetry 3.2 Historiography 3.3 Science and mathematics 3.4 Philosophy 3.5 Prose fiction 4 Legacy 5 Notes 6 References 7 Further reading 8 External links Pre-classical and classical antiquity[edit] Further information: Mycenaean Greece, Archaic Greece, and Classical Greece Linear B tablet from the Archaeological Museum of Mycenae Tablet MY Oe 106 (obverse) exhibited at the Greek National Archaeological Museum This period of Greek literature stretches from Homer until the fourth century BC and the rise of Alexander the Great. The earliest known Greek writings are Mycenaean, written in the Linear B syllabary on clay tablets. These documents contain prosaic records largely concerned with trade (lists, inventories, receipts, etc.); no real literature has been discovered.[1][2] Michael Ventris and John Chadwick, the original decipherers of Linear B, state that literature almost certainly existed in Mycenaean Greece,[2] but it was either not written down or, if it was, it was on parchment or wooden tablets, which did not survive the destruction of the Mycenaean palaces in the twelfth century BC.[2] Greek literature was divided in well-defined literary genres, each one having a compulsory formal structure, about both dialect and metrics.[3] The first division was between prose and poetry. Within poetry there were three super-genres: epic, lyric and drama. The common European terminology about literary genres is directly derived from the ancient Greek terminology.[4] Lyric and drama were further divided into more genres: lyric in four (elegiac, iambic, monodic lyric and choral lyric); drama in three (tragedy, comedy and pastoral drama).[5] Prose literature can largely be said to begin with Herodotus.[6] Over time, several genres of prose literature developed,[6] but the distinctions between them were frequently blurred.[6] Epic poetry[edit] At the beginning of Greek literature stand the two monumental works of Homer, the Iliad and the Odyssey.[7]:1–3 The figure of Homer is shrouded in mystery. Although the works as they now stand are credited to him, it is certain that their roots reach far back before his time (see Homeric Question).[7]:15 The Iliad is a narrative of a single episode spanning over the course of a ten-day-period from near the end of the ten years of the Trojan War. It centers on the person of Achilles,[8] who embodied the Greek heroic ideal.[9][7]:3 A painting by the French Neoclassical painter Thomas Degeorge depicting the climactic final scene from Book Twenty-Two of The Odyssey in which Odysseus, Telemachus, Eumaeus, and Philoetius slaughter the suitors of Penelope The Odyssey is an account of the adventures of Odysseus, one of the warriors at Troy.[7]:3 After ten years fighting the war, he spends another ten years sailing back home to his wife and family. Penelope was considered the ideal female, Homer depicted her as the ideal female based on her commitment, modesty, purity, and respect during her marriage with Odysseus. During his ten-year voyage, he loses all of his comrades and ships and makes his way home to Ithaca disguised as a beggar. Both of these works were based on ancient legends.[7]:15 The stories are told in language that is simple, and direct. The Homeric dialect was an archaic language based on Ionic dialect mixed with some element of Aeolic dialect and Attic dialect,[10] the latter due to the Athenian edition of the 6th century BC. The epic verse was the hexameter.[11] The other great poet of the preclassical period was Hesiod.[7]:23–24[12] Unlike Homer, Hesiod refers to himself in his poetry.[13] Nonetheless, nothing is known about him from any external source. He was a native of Boeotia in central Greece, and is thought to have lived and worked around 700 BC.[14] Hesiod's two extant poems are Works and Days and Theogony. Works and Days is a faithful depiction of the poverty-stricken country life he knew so well, and it sets forth principles and rules for farmers. Theogony is a systematic account of creation and of the gods. It vividly describes the ages of mankind, beginning with a long-past Golden Age.[15] The writings of Homer and Hesiod were held in extremely high regard throughout antiquity[12] and were viewed by many ancient authors as the foundational texts behind ancient Greek religion;[16] Homer told the story of a heroic past, which Hesiod bracketed with a creation narrative and an account of the practical realities of contemporary daily life.[7]:23–24 Lyric poetry[edit] Main article: Greek lyric A nineteenth-century painting by the English painter Sir Lawrence Alma-Tadema depicting the poetess Sappho gazing on in admiration as the poet Alcaeus plays the lyre Lyric poetry received its name from the fact that it was originally sung by individuals or a chorus accompanied by the instrument called the lyre. Despite the name, however, the lyric poetry in this general meaning was divided in four genres, two of which were not accompanied by cithara, but by flute. These two latter genres were elegiac poetry and iambic poetry. Both were written in the Ionic dialect. Elegiac poems were written in elegiac couplets and iambic poems were written in iambic trimeter. The first of the lyric poets was probably Archilochus of Paros, 7th century BC, the most important iambic poet.[17] Only fragments remain of his work, as is the case with most of the poets. The few remnants suggest that he was an embittered adventurer who led a very turbulent life.[18] Many lyric poems were written in the Aeolic dialect. Lyric poems often employed highly varied poetic meters. The most famous of all lyric poets were the so-called "Nine Lyric Poets".[19] Of all the lyric poets, Sappho of Lesbos (c. 630 – c. 570 BC) was by far the most widely revered. In antiquity, her poems were regarded with the same degree of respect as the poems of Homer.[20] Only one of her poems, "Ode to Aphrodite", has survived to the present day in its original, completed form.[21] In addition to Sappho, her contemporary Alcaeus of Lesbos was also notable for monodic lyric poetry. The poetry written by Alcman was considered beautiful, even though he wrote exclusively in the Doric dialect, which was normally considered unpleasant to hear.[22] The later poet Pindar of Thebes was renowned for his choral lyric poetry.[23] Drama[edit] Medea kills her son (a scene from Euripides's Medea), Campanian red-figure amphora, c. 330 BC, Louvre (K 300) All surviving works of Greek drama were composed by playwrights from Athens and are written exclusively in the Attic dialect.[24] Choral performances were a common tradition in all Greek city-states.[24] The Athenians credited a man named Thespis with having invented drama[24] by introducing the first actor, whose primary purpose was to interact with the leader of the chorus.[25] Later playwrights expanded the number of actors to three, allowing for greater freedom in storytelling.[26] In the age that followed the Greco-Persian Wars, the awakened national spirit of Athens was expressed in hundreds of tragedies based on heroic and legendary themes of the past. The tragic plays grew out of simple choral songs and dialogues performed at festivals of the god Dionysus. In the classical period, performances included three tragedies and one pastoral drama, depicting four different episodes of the same myth. Wealthy citizens were chosen to bear the expense of costuming and training the chorus as a public and religious duty. Attendance at the festival performances was regarded as an act of worship. Performances were held in the great open-air theater of Dionysus in Athens. The poets competed for the prizes offered for the best plays.[27] All fully surviving Greek tragedies are conventionally attributed to Aeschylus, Sophocles or Euripides. The authorship of Prometheus Bound, which is traditionally attributed to Aeschylus,[28] and Rhesus, which is traditionally attributed to Euripides, are, however, questioned.[29] There are seven surviving tragedies attributed to Aeschylus. Three of these plays, Agamemnon, The Libation-Bearers, and The Eumenides, form a trilogy known as The Oresteia.[30] One of these plays, Prometheus Bound, however, may actually be the work of Aeschylus's son Euphorion.[31] Seven works of Sophocles have survived, the most acclaimed of which are the three Theban plays, which center around the story of Oedipus and his offspring.[32] The Theban Trilogy consists of Oedipus the King, Oedipus at Colonus, and Antigone. Although the plays are often called a "trilogy," they were actually written many years apart. Antigone, the last of the three plays sequentially, was actually first to be written, having been composed in 441 BC, towards the beginning of Sophocles's career.[33] Oedipus the King, the most famous of the three, was written around 429 BC at the midpoint of Sophocles's career.[Notes 1] Oedipus at Colonus, the second of the three plays chronologically, was actually Sophocles's last play and was performed in 401 BC, after Sophocles's death.[34] There are nineteen surviving plays attributed to Euripides. The most well-known of these plays are Medea, Hippolytus, and Bacchae.[35] Rhesus is sometimes thought to have been written by Euripides' son, or to have been a posthumous reproduction of a play by Euripides.[36] Euripides pushed the limits of the tragic genre and many of the elements in his plays were more typical of comedy than tragedy.[37] His play Alcestis, for instance, has often been categorized as a "problem play" or perhaps even as a work of tragicomedy rather than a true tragedy due to its comedic elements and the fact that it has a happy ending.[38][39] Illustration for Aristophanes's Lysistrata by Aubrey Beardsley (1896) Like tragedy, comedy arose from a ritual in honor of Dionysus, but in this case the plays were full of frank obscenity, abuse, and insult. At Athens, the comedies became an official part of the festival celebration in 486 BC, and prizes were offered for the best productions. As with the tragedians, few works still remain of the great comedic writers. The only complete surviving works of classical comedy are eleven plays written by the playwright Aristophanes.[40] These are a treasure trove of comic presentation. He poked fun at everyone and every institution. In The Birds, he ridicules Athenian democracy. In The Clouds, he attacks the philosopher Socrates. In Lysistrata, he denounces war.[41] Aristophanes has been praised highly for his dramatic skill and artistry. John Lemprière's Bibliotheca Classica describes him as, quite simply, "the greatest comic dramatist in world literature: by his side Molière seems dull and Shakespeare clownish."[42] Of all Aristophanes's plays, however, the one that has received the most lasting recognition is The Frogs, which simultaneously satirizes and immortalizes the two giants of Athenian tragedy: Aeschylus and Euripides. When it was performed for the first time at the Lenaia Festival in 405 BC, just one year after the death of Euripides, the Athenians awarded it first prize.[43] It was the only Greek play that was ever given an encore performance, which took place two months later at the City Dionysia.[44] Even today, The Frogs still appeals to modern audiences. A commercially successful modern musical adaptation of it was performed on Broadway in 2004.[45] The third dramatic genre was the satyr play. Although the genre was popular, only one complete example of a satyr play has survived: Cyclops by Euripides.[46] Large portions of a second satyr play, Ichneutae by Sophocles, have been recovered from the site of Oxyrhynchus in Egypt among the Oxyrhynchus Papyri.[47] Historiography[edit] A second century AD Roman copy of a Greek bust of Herodotus from the first half of the fourth century BC Two notable historians who lived during the Classical Era were Herodotus of Halicarnassus and Thucydides. Herodotus is commonly called "The Father of History."[48] His book The Histories is among the oldest works of prose literature in existence. Thucydides's book History of the Peloponnesian War greatly influenced later writers and historians, including the author of the book of Acts of the Apostles and the Byzantine Era historian Procopius of Caesarea.[49] A third historian of ancient Greece, Xenophon of Athens, began his Hellenica where Thucydides ended his work about 411 BC and carried his history to 362 BC.[50] Xenophon's most famous work is his book The Anabasis, a detailed, first-hand account of his participation in a Greek mercenary army that tried to help the Persian Cyrus expel his brother from the throne. Xenophon also wrote three works in praise of the philosopher Socrates: The Apology of Socrates to the Jury, The Symposium, and Memorabilia. Although both Xenophon and Plato knew Socrates, their accounts are very different. Many comparisons have been made between the account of the military historian and the account of the poet-philosopher.[51] Philosophy[edit] Many important and influential philosophers lived during the fifth and fourth centuries BC. Among the earliest Greek philosophers were the three so-called "Milesian philosophers": Thales of Miletus, Anaximander, and Anaximenes.[52] Of these philosophers' writings, however, only one fragment from Anaximander preserved by Simplicius of Cilicia has survived.[Notes 2][53] Very little is known for certain about the life of the philosopher Pythagoras of Samos and no writings by him have survived to the present day,[54] but an impressive corpus of poetic writings written by his pupil Empedocles of Acragas has survived, making Empedocles one of the most widely attested Pre-Socratic philosophers.[55] A large number of fragments written by the philosophers Heraclitus of Ephesus[56] and Democritus of Abdera have also survived.[57] Of all the classical philosophers, however, Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle are generally considered the most important and influential. Socrates did not write any books himself and modern scholars debate whether or not Plato's portrayal of him is accurate. Some scholars contend that many of his ideas, or at least a vague approximation of them, are expressed in Plato's early socratic dialogues.[58] Meanwhile, other scholars have argued that Plato's portrayal of Socrates is merely a fictional representation intended to expound Plato's own opinions who has very little to do with the historical figure of the same name.[59] The debate over the extent to which Plato's portrayal of Socrates represents the actual Socrates's ideas is known as the Socratic problem.[60][61] The Death of Socrates, by Jacques-Louis David (1787) Plato expressed his ideas through dialogues, that is, written works purporting to describe conversations between different individuals. Some of the best-known of these include: The Apology of Socrates, a purported record of the speech Socrates gave at his trial;[62] Phaedo, a description of the last conversation between Socrates and his disciples before his execution;[63] The Symposium, a dialogue over the nature of love;[64] and The Republic, widely regarded as Plato's most important work,[65][66] a long dialogue describing the ideal government.[67] Aristotle of Stagira is widely considered to be one of the most important and influential philosophical thinkers of all time.[68] The first sentence of his Metaphysics reads: "All men by nature desire to know." He has, therefore, been called the "Father of those who know." His medieval disciple Thomas Aquinas referred to him simply as "the Philosopher". Aristotle was a student at Plato's Academy, and like his teacher, he wrote dialogues, or conversations. However, none of these exist today. The body of writings that have come down to the present probably represents lectures that he delivered at his own school in Athens, the Lyceum.[69] Even from these books, the enormous range of his interests is evident: He explored matters other than those that are today considered philosophical; the extant treatises cover logic, the physical and biological sciences, ethics, politics, and constitutional government. Among Aristotle's most notable works are Politics, Nicomachean Ethics, Poetics, On the Soul, and Rhetoric.[70] Hellenistic period[edit] Further information: Hellenistic period, Hellenistic art, and Hellenistic Greece Imaginative nineteenth-century engraving of the ancient Library of Alexandria By 338 BC all of the Greek city-states except Sparta had been united by Philip II of Macedon.[71] Philip's son Alexander the Great extended his father's conquests greatly. Athens lost its preeminent status as the leader of Greek culture, and it was replaced temporarily by Alexandria, Egypt.[72] The city of Alexandria in northern Egypt became, from the 3rd century BC, the outstanding center of Greek culture. It also soon attracted a large Jewish population, making it the largest center for Jewish scholarship in the ancient world. In addition, it later became a major focal point for the development of Christian thought. The Musaeum, or Shrine to the Muses, which included the library and school, was founded by Ptolemy I. The institution was from the beginning intended as a great international school and library.[73] The library, eventually containing more than a half million volumes, was mostly in Greek. It was intended to serve as a repository for every work of classical Greek literature that could be found.[74] Poetry[edit] A painting by John William Waterhouse depicting a scene from The Argonautica by Apollonius of Rhodes The genre of bucolic poetry was first developed by the poet Theocritus.[75] The Roman Virgil later wrote his Eclogues in this genre.[76] Callimachus, a scholar at the Library of Alexandria, composed the Aetia ("Causes"),[77] a long poem written in four volumes of elegiac couplets describing the legendary origins of obscure customs, festivals, and names,[77] which he probably wrote in several stages over the course of many years in the third century BC.[77] The Aetia was lost during the Middle Ages,[77] but, over the course of the twentieth century, much of it was recovered due to new discoveries of ancient papyri.[77] Scholars initially denigrated it as "second-rate", showing great learning, but lacking true "art".[77] Over the course of the century, scholarly appraisal of it greatly improved, with many scholars now seeing it in a much more positive light.[77] Callimachus also wrote short poems for special occasions and at least one short epic, the Ibis, which was directed against his former pupil Apollonius.[78] He also compiled a prose treatise entitled the Pinakes, in which he catalogued all the major works held in the Library of Alexandria.[79] The Alexandrian poet Apollonius of Rhodes is best known for his epic poem the Argonautica, which narrates the adventures of Jason and his shipmates the Argonauts on their quest to retrieve the Golden Fleece from the land of Colchis.[80] The poet Aratus wrote the hexameter poem Phaenomena, a poetic rendition of Eudoxus of Cnidus's treatise on the stars written in the fourth century BC.[81] Drama[edit] Republican or Early Imperial relief depicting a seating Menander holding the masks of New Comedy (1st century BC – early 1st century AD) Princeton University Art Museum During the Hellenistic period, the Old Comedy of the Classical Era was replaced by New Comedy. The most notable writer of New Comedy was the Athenian playwright Menander. None of Menander's plays have survived to the present day in their complete form, but one play, The Bad-Tempered Man, has survived to the present day in a near-complete form. Most of another play entitled The Girl from Samos and large portions of another five have also survived.[82] Historiography[edit] The historian Timaeus was born in Sicily but spent most of his life in Athens.[83] His History, though lost, is significant because of its influence on Polybius. In 38 books it covered the history of Sicily and Italy to the year 264 BC, which is where Polybius begins his work. Timaeus also wrote the Olympionikai, a valuable chronological study of the Olympic Games.[84] Ancient Biography[edit] Ancient biography, or bios, as distinct from modern biography, was a genre of Greek (and Roman) literature interested in describing the goals, achievements, failures, and character of ancient historical persons and whether or not they should be imitated. Authors of ancient bios, such as the works of Nepos and Plutarch's Parallel Lives imitated many of the same sources and techniques of the contemporary historiographies of ancient Greece, notably including the works of Herodotus and Thucydides. There were various forms of ancient biographies, including 1) philosophical biographies that brought out the moral character of their subject (such as Diogenes Laertius's Lives of Eminent Philosophers 2) literary biographies which discussed the lives of orators and poets (such as Philostratus's Lives of the Sophists) 3) school and reference biographies that offered a short sketch of someone including their ancestry, major events and accomplishments, and death, 4) autobiographies, commentaries and memoirs where the subject presents his own life and 5) historical/political biography focusing on the lives of those active in the military, among other categories.[85] Science and mathematics[edit] In 1906, The Archimedes Palimpsest revealed works by Archimedes previously thought to have been lost. Eratosthenes of Alexandria (c. 276 BC – c. 195/194 BC), wrote on astronomy and geography, but his work is known mainly from later summaries. He is credited with being the first person to measure the Earth's circumference. Much that was written by the mathematicians Euclid and Archimedes has been preserved. Euclid is known for his Elements, much of which was drawn from his predecessor Eudoxus of Cnidus. The Elements is a treatise on geometry, and it has exerted a continuing influence on mathematics. From Archimedes several treatises have come down to the present. Among them are Measurement of the Circle, in which he worked out the value of pi; The Method of Mechanical Theorems, on his work in mechanics; The Sand Reckoner; and On Floating Bodies. A manuscript of his works is currently being studied.[86] Prose fiction[edit] Very little has survived of prose fiction from the Hellenistic Era. The Milesiaka by Aristides of Miletos was probably written during the second century BC. The Milesiaka itself has not survived to the present day in its complete form, but various references to it have survived. The book established a whole new genre of so-called "Milesian tales," of which The Golden Ass by the later Roman writer Apuleius is a prime example.[87][88] The ancient Greek novels Chaereas and Callirhoe[89] by Chariton and Metiochus and Parthenope[90][91] were probably both written during the late first century BC or early first century AD, during the latter part of the Hellenistic Era. The discovery of several fragments of Lollianos's Phoenician Tale reveal the existence of a genre of ancient Greek picaresque novel.[92] Roman period[edit] Further information: Roman Greece While the transition from city-state to empire affected philosophy a great deal, shifting the emphasis from political theory to personal ethics, Greek letters continued to flourish both under the Successors (especially the Ptolemies) and under Roman rule. Romans of literary or rhetorical inclination looked to Greek models, and Greek literature of all types continued to be read and produced both by native speakers of Greek and later by Roman authors as well. A notable characteristic of this period was the expansion of literary criticism as a genre, particularly as exemplified by Demetrius, Pseudo-Longinus and Dionysius of Halicarnassus. The New Testament, written by various authors in varying qualities of Koine Greek also hails from this period,[93][7]:208–209 the most important works being the Gospels and the Epistles of Saint Paul.[94][7]:208–213 Poetry[edit] The Mykonos vase, one of the earliest surviving depictions of the myth of the Trojan Horse, a myth which is described in depth in Quintus of Smyrna's Posthomerica The poet Quintus of Smyrna, who probably lived during the late fourth century AD,[95][96] wrote Posthomerica, an epic poem narrating the story of the fall of Troy, beginning where The Iliad left off.[97] The poet Nonnus of Panopolis wrote The Dionysiaca, the longest surviving epic poem from antiquity. He also wrote a poetic paraphrase of The Gospel of John.[98][99] Nonnus probably lived sometime during the late fourth century AD or early fifth century AD.[100][101] Historiography[edit] A bust of Plutarch, one of the most famous ancient Greek historians, from his hometown of Chaeronea The historian Polybius was born about 200 BC. He was brought to Rome as a hostage in 168. In Rome he became a friend of the general Scipio Aemilianus. He probably accompanied the general to Spain and North Africa in the wars against Carthage. He was with Scipio at the destruction of Carthage in 146.[102] Diodorus Siculus was a Greek historian who lived in the 1st century BC, around the time of Julius Caesar and Augustus. He wrote a universal history, Bibliotheca Historica, in 40 books. Of these, the first five and the 11th through the 20th remain. The first two parts covered history through the early Hellenistic era. The third part takes the story to the beginning of Caesar's wars in Gaul, now France.[103] Dionysius of Halicarnassus lived late in the first century BC. His history of Rome from its origins to the First Punic War (264 to 241 BC) is written from a Roman point of view, but it is carefully researched. He also wrote a number of other treatises, including On Imitation, Commentaries on the Ancient Orators, and On the Arrangement of Words.[104] The historians Appian of Alexandria and Arrian of Nicomedia both lived in the second century AD.[105][106] Appian wrote on Rome and its conquests, while Arrian is remembered for his work on the campaigns of Alexander the Great. Arrian served in the Roman army. His book therefore concentrates heavily on the military aspects of Alexander's life. Arrian also wrote a philosophical treatise, the Diatribai, based on the teachings of his mentor Epictetus. Best known of the late Greek historians to modern readers is Plutarch of Chaeronea, who died about AD 119. His Parallel Lives of great Greek and Roman leaders has been read by every generation since the work was first published. His other surviving work is the Moralia, a collection of essays on ethical, religious, political, physical, and literary topics.[107][108] During later times, so-called "commonplace books," usually describing historical anecdotes, became quite popular. Surviving examples of this popular genre include works such as Aulus Gellius's Attic Nights,[109] Athenaeus of Naucratis's Deipnosophistae,[110] and Claudius Aelianus's De Natura Animalium and Varia Historia.[111] Science and mathematics[edit] Further information: Greek mathematics, Greek astronomy, and Medicine in ancient Greece Manuscript (1485), of Pausanias's Description of Greece at the Laurentian Library The physician Galen lived during the 2nd century AD. He was a careful student of anatomy, and his works exerted a powerful influence on medicine for the next 1,400 years. Strabo, who died about AD 23, was a geographer and historian. His Historical Sketches in 47 volumes has nearly all been lost. His Geographical Sketches remain as the only existing ancient book covering the whole range of people and countries known to the Greeks and Romans through the time of Augustus.[112] Pausanias, who lived in the 2nd century AD, was also a geographer.[113] His Description of Greece is a travel guide describing the geography and mythic history of Greece during the second century. The book takes the form of a tour of Greece, starting in Athens and ending in Naupactus.[114] The scientist of the Roman period who had the greatest influence on later generations was undoubtedly the astronomer Ptolemy. He lived during the 2nd century AD,[115] though little is known of his life. His masterpiece, originally entitled The Mathematical Collection, has come to the present under the title Almagest, as it was translated by Arab astronomers with that title.[116] It was Ptolemy who devised a detailed description of an Earth-centered universe,[117] a notion that dominated astronomical thinking for more than 1,300 years.[118] The Ptolemaic view of the universe endured until Copernicus, Galileo, Kepler, and other early modern astronomers replaced it with heliocentrism.[119] Philosophy[edit] Head of Plotinus, a major philosopher from the Roman Era Epictetus (c. 55 AD – 135 AD) was associated with the moral philosophy of the Stoics. His teachings were collected by his pupil Arrian in the Discourses and the Encheiridion (Manual of Study).[120] Diogenes Laërtius, who lived in the third century AD, wrote Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers, a voluminous collection of biographies of nearly every Greek philosopher who ever lived. Unfortunately, Diogenes Laërtius often fails to cite his sources and many modern historians consider his testimony unreliable.[121] Nonetheless, in spite of this, he remains the only available source on the lives of many early Greek philosophers.[122] His book is not entirely without merit; it does preserve a tremendous wealth of information that otherwise would not have been preserved. His biography of Epicurus, for instance, is of particularly high quality and contains three lengthy letters attributed to Epicurus himself, at least two of which are generally agreed to be authentic.[123] Another major philosopher of his period was Plotinus. He transformed Plato's philosophy into a school called Neoplatonism.[124] His Enneads had a wide-ranging influence on European thought until at least the seventeenth century.[125] Plotinus's philosophy mainly revolved around the concepts of nous, psyche, and the "One."[126] After the rise of Christianity, many of the most important philosophers were Christians. The second-century Christian apologist Justin Martyr, who wrote exclusively in Greek, made extensive use of ideas from Greek philosophy, especially Platonism.[127] Origen of Alexandria, the founder of Christian theology,[128] also made extensive use of ideas from Greek philosophy[129] and was even able to hold his own against the pagan philosopher Celsus in his apologetic treatise Contra Celsum.[130] Prose fiction[edit] A nineteenth-century painting by the Swiss-French painter Marc Gabriel Charles Gleyre depicting a scene from Daphnis and Chloe The Roman Period was the time when the majority of extant works of Greek prose fiction were composed. The ancient Greek novels Leucippe and Clitophon by Achilles Tatius[131][132] and Daphnis and Chloe by Longus[133] were both probably written during the early second century AD. Daphnis and Chloe, by far the most famous of the five surviving ancient Greek romance novels, is a nostalgic tale of two young lovers growing up in an idealized pastoral environment on the Greek island of Lesbos.[134] The Wonders Beyond Thule by Antonius Diogenes may have also been written during the early second century AD, although scholars are unsure of its exact date. The Wonders Beyond Thule has not survived in its complete form, but a very lengthy summary of it written by Photios I of Constantinople has survived.[135] The Ephesian Tale by Xenophon of Ephesus was probably written during the late second century AD.[133] Illustration from 1894 by William Strang depicting a battle scene from Book One of Lucian of Samosata's A True Story The satirist Lucian of Samosata lived during the late second century AD. Lucian's works were incredibly popular during antiquity. Over eighty different writings attributed to Lucian have survived to the present day.[136] Almost all of Lucian's works are written in the heavily Atticized dialect of ancient Greek language prevalent among the well-educated at the time. His book The Syrian Goddess, however, was written in a faux-Ionic dialect, deliberately imitating the dialect and style of Herodotus.[137][138] Lucian's most famous work is the novel A True Story, which some authors have described as the earliest surviving work of science fiction.[139][140] His dialogue The Lover of Lies contains several of the earliest known ghost stories[141] as well as the earliest known version of "The Sorcerer's Apprentice."[142] His letter The Passing of Peregrinus, a ruthless satire against Christians, contains one of the earliest pagan appraisals of early Christianity.[143] The Aethiopica by Heliodorus of Emesa was probably written during the third century AD.[144] It tells the story of a young Ethiopian princess named Chariclea, who is estranged from her family and goes on many misadventures across the known world.[145] Of all the ancient Greek novels, the one that attained the greatest level of popularity was the Alexander Romance, a fictionalized account of the exploits of Alexander the Great written in the third century AD. Eighty versions of it have survived in twenty-four different languages, attesting that, during the Middle Ages, the novel was nearly as popular as the Bible.[146]:650–654 Versions of the Alexander Romance were so commonplace in the fourteenth century that Geoffrey Chaucer wrote that "...every wight that hath discrecioun / Hath herd somwhat or al of [Alexander's] fortune."[146]:653–654 Legacy[edit] Hero Mourns the Dead Leander by Gillis Backereel (1640s) Ancient Greek literature has had an enormous impact on western literature as a whole.[147] Ancient Roman authors adopted various styles and motifs from ancient Greek literature. These ideas were later, in turn, adopted by other western European writers and literary critics.[147] Ancient Greek literature especially influenced later Greek literature. For instance, the Greek novels influenced the later work Hero and Leander, written by Musaeus Grammaticus.[148] Ancient Roman writers were acutely aware of the ancient Greek literary legacy and many deliberately emulated the style and formula of Greek classics in their own works. The Roman poet Vergil, for instance, modeled his epic poem The Aeneid on The Iliad and The Odyssey.[149] During the Middle Ages, ancient Greek literature was largely forgotten in Western Europe. The medieval writer Roger Bacon wrote that "there are not four men in Latin Christendom who are acquainted with the Greek, Hebrew, and Arabic grammars."[150] It was not until the Renaissance that Greek writings were rediscovered by western European scholars.[151] During the Renaissance, Greek began to be taught in western European colleges and universities for the first time, which resulted in western European scholars rediscovering the literature of ancient Greece.[152] The Textus Receptus, the first New Testament printed in the original Greek, was published in 1512 by the Italian humanist scholar Desiderius Erasmus.[153] Erasmus also published Latin translations of classical Greek texts, including a Latin translation of Hesiod's Works and Days.[154] The influence of classical Greek literature on modern literature is also evident. Numerous figures from classical literature and mythology appear throughout The Divine Comedy by Dante Alighieri.[155] Plutarch's Lives were a major influence on William Shakespeare and served as the main source behind his tragedies Julius Caesar, Antony and Cleopatra, and Coriolanus.[156]:883–884 Shakespeare's comedies A Comedy of Errors and The Twelfth Night drew heavily on themes from Graeco-Roman New Comedy.[156]:881–882 Meanwhile, Shakespeare's tragedy Timon of Athens was inspired by a story written by Lucian[157] and his comedy Pericles, Prince of Tyre was based on an adaptation of the ancient Greek novel Apollonius of Tyre found in John Gower's Confessio Amantis.[158] Page from an Arabic translation of Aristotle's Poetics by Abū Bishr Mattā John Milton's epic poem Paradise Lost is written using a similar style to the two Homeric epics.[159] It also makes frequent allusions to figures from classical literature and mythology, using them as symbols to convey a Christian message.[160] Lucian's A True Story was part of the inspiration for Jonathan Swift's novel Gulliver's Travels.[156]:545 Bulfinch's Mythology, a book on Greek mythology published in 1867 and aimed at a popular audience, was described by Carl J. Richard as "one of the most popular books ever published in the United States".[161] George Bernard Shaw's play Pygmalion is a modern, rationalized retelling of the ancient Greek legend of Pygmalion.[156]:794 James Joyce's novel Ulysses, heralded by critics as one of the greatest works of modern literature,[162][163] is a retelling of Homer's Odyssey set in modern-day Dublin.[164][165] The mid-twentieth-century British author Mary Renault wrote a number of critically acclaimed novels inspired by ancient Greek literature and mythology, including The Last of the Wine and The King Must Die.[166] Even in works that do not consciously draw on Graeco-Roman literature, authors often employ concepts and themes originating in ancient Greece. The ideas expressed in Aristotle's Poetics, in particular, have influenced generations of Western writers and literary critics.[167] A Latin translation of an Arabic version of the Poetics by Averroes was available during the Middle Ages.[168] Common Greek literary terms still used today include: catharsis,[169] ethos,[170] anagnorisis,[171] hamartia,[172] hubris,[173] mimesis,[174] mythos,[175] nemesis,[176] and peripeteia.[177] Notes[edit] ^ Although Sophocles won second prize with the group of plays that included Oedipus Rex, its date of production is uncertain. The prominence of the Theban plague at the play's opening suggests to many scholars a reference to the plague that devastated Athens in 430 BC, and hence a production date shortly thereafter. See, for example, Knox, Bernard (1956). "The Date of the Oedipus Tyrannus of Sophocles". American Journal of Philology. 77 (2): 133–147. doi:10.2307/292475. JSTOR 292475. ^ Simplicius, Comments on Aristotle's Physics (24, 13): "Ἀναξίμανδρος [...] λέγει δ' αὐτὴν μήτε ὕδωρ μήτε ἄλλο τι τῶν καλουμένων εἶναι στοιχείων, ἀλλ' ἑτέραν τινὰ φύσιν ἄπειρον, ἐξ ἧς ἅπαντας γίνεσθαι τοὺς οὐρανοὺς καὶ τοὺς ἐν αὐτοῖς κόσμους· ἐξ ὧν δὲ ἡ γένεσίς ἐστι τοῖς οὖσι, καὶ τὴν φθορὰν εἰς ταῦτα γίνεσθαι κατὰ τὸ χρεών· διδόναι γὰρ αὐτὰ δίκην καὶ τίσιν ἀλλήλοις τῆς ἀδικίας κατὰ τὴν τοῦ χρόνου τάξιν, ποιητικωτέροις οὕτως ὀνόμασιν αὐτὰ λέγων. δῆλον δὲ ὅτι τὴν εἰς ἄλληλα μεταβολὴν τῶν τεττάρων στοιχείων οὗτος θεασάμενος οὐκ ἠξίωσεν ἕν τι τούτων ὑποκείμενον ποιῆσαι, ἀλλά τι ἄλλο παρὰ ταῦτα· οὗτος δὲ οὐκ ἀλλοιουμένου τοῦ στοιχείου τὴν γένεσιν ποιεῖ, ἀλλ' ἀποκρινομένων τῶν ἐναντίων διὰ τῆς αἰδίου κινήσεως." In ancient Greek, quotes usually blend with the surrounding text. Consequently, deciding where they start and where they end is often difficult. However, it is generally accepted that this quote is not Simplicius' own interpretation, but Anaximander's writing, in "somewhat poetic terms" as it is mentioned by Simplicius. References[edit] ^ Chadwick, John (1967). The Decipherment of Linear B (Second ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. p. 101. ISBN 978-1-107-69176-6. "The glimpse we have suddenly been given of the account books of a long-forgotten people..." ^ a b c Ventris, Michael; Chadwick, John (1956). Documents in Mycenaean Greek. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. p. xxix. ISBN 978-1-107-50341-0. ^ Heath, Malcolm, ed. (1997). Aristotle's Poetics. Penguin Books. ISBN 0-14-044636-2. ^ Grendler, Paul F (2004). The Universities of the Italian Renaissance. Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 239. ISBN 0-8018-8055-6. ^ Frow, John (2007). Genre (Reprint ed.). Routledge. pp. 57–59. ISBN 978-0-415-28063-1. ^ a b c Engels, Johannes (2008). "Chapter Ten: Universal History and Cultural Geography of the Oikoumene in Herodotus' Historiai and Strabo's Geographika". In Pigoń, Jakub (ed.). The Children of Herodotus: Greek and Roman Historiography and Related Genres. Newcastle upon Tyne, England: Cambridge Scholar Publishing. p. 146. ISBN 978-1-4438-0015-0. ^ a b c d e f g h i Jenkyns, Richard (2016). Classical Literature: An Epic Journey from Homer to Virgil and Beyond. New York City, New York: Basic Books, A Member of the Perseus Books Group. ISBN 978-0-465-09797-5. ^ Lattimore, Richmond (2011). The Iliad of Homer. The University of Chicago Press, Ltd., London: The University of Chicago Press. Book 1, Line number 155 (p. 79). ISBN 978-0-226-47049-8. ^ Guy Hedreen, "The Cult of Achilles in the Euxine" Hesperia 60.3 (July 1991), pp. 313–330. ^ Stanford, William Bedell (1959) [1947]. "Introduction, Grammatical Introduction". Homer: Odyssey I-XII. 1 (2nd ed.). Macmillan Education Ltd. pp. ix–lxxxvi. ISBN 1-85399-502-9. ^ Harris, William. "The Greek Dactylic Hexameter: A Practical Reading Approach". Middlebury College. Retrieved 12 March 2017. ^ a b M. Hadas (2013-08-13). A History of Greek Literature (p.16). published by Columbia University Press 13 Aug 2013, 327 pages. ISBN 978-0-231-51486-6. Retrieved 2015-09-08. ^ J.P. Barron and P.E. Easterling, "Hesiod" in The Cambridge History of Classical Literature: Greek Literature, P. Easterling and B. Knox (eds), Cambridge University Press (1985), page 92 ^ West, M. L. Theogony. Oxford University Press (1966), page 40 ^ Jasper Griffin, "Greek Myth and Hesiod", J. Boardman, J. Griffin and O. Murray (eds), The Oxford History of the Classical World, Oxford University Press (1986), page 88 ^ Cartwright, Mark. "Greek Religion". Ancient History Encyclopedia. Ancient History Encyclopedia. Retrieved 17 January 2017. "... These traditions were first recounted only orally as there was no sacred text in Greek religion and later, attempts were made to put in writing this oral tradition, notably by Hesiod in his Theogony and more indirectly in the works of Homer. ^ J. P. Barron and P. E. Easterling, 'Elegy and Iambus', in The Cambridge History of Classical Literature: Greek Literature, P. Easterling and B. Knox (ed.s), Cambridge University Press (1985), page 117 ^ David A. Campbell, Greek Lyric Poetry, Bristol Classical Press (1982) page 136 ^ J. M. Edmonds - Lyra Graeca (p.3) Wildside Press LLC, 2007 ISBN 1-4344-9130-7 [Retrieved 2015-05-06] ^ Hallett, Judith P. (1979). "Sappho and her Social Context: Sense and Sensuality". Signs. 4 (3). ^ Rayor, Diane; Lardinois, André (2014). Sappho: A New Edition of the Complete Works. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-02359-8. ^ Pausanias 3.15.2 Ἀλκμᾶνι ποιήσαντι ἄισματα οὐδὲν ἐς ἡδονὴν αὐτῶν ἐλυμήνατο τῶν Λακῶνων ἡ γλῶσσα ἥκιστα παρεχομένη τὸ εὔφωνον. ^ M. Davies's "Monody, Choral Lyric, and the Tyranny of the Hand-Book" in Classical Quarterly, NS 38 (1988), pp. 52–64. ^ a b c Garland, Robert (2008). Ancient Greece: Everyday Life in the Birthplace of Western Civilization. New York City, New York: Sterling. p. 284. ISBN 978-1-4549-0908-8. ^ Buckham, Philip Wentworth, Theatre of the Greeks, Cambridge : J. Smith, 1827. ^ Garland, Robert (2008). Ancient Greece: Everyday Life in the Birthplace of Western Civilization. New York City, New York: Sterling. p. 290. ISBN 978-1-4549-0908-8. ^ Garland, Robert (2008). Ancient Greece: Everyday Life in the Birthplace of Western Civilization. New York City, New York: Sterling. pp. 284–296. ISBN 978-1-4549-0908-8. ^ Griffith, Mark. The Authenticity of the Prometheus Bound. Cambridge, 1977. ^ Walton, J. Michael, Euripides Our Contemporary, University of California Press, 2009, ISBN 0-520-26179-8. ^ Burke, Kenneth (1952). "Form and Persecution in the Oresteia". The Sewanee Review. 60 (3: July – September): 377–396. JSTOR 27538150. ^ West, M.L. Studies in Aeschylus. Stuttgart, 1990. ^ Suda (ed. Finkel et al.): s.v. Σοφοκλῆς. ^ Fagles, Robert (1986). The Three Theban Plays. New York: Penguin. p. 35. ^ Pomeroy, Sarah; Burstein, Stanley; Donlan, Walter; Roberts, Jennifer (1999). Ancient Greece: A Political, Social, and Cultural History. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 322. ISBN 0-19-509742-4. ^ B. Knox,'Euripides' in The Cambridge History of Classical Literature I: Greek Literature, P. Easterling and B. Knox (ed.s), Cambridge University Press (1985), page 316 ^ Walton (1997, viii, xix) ^ B. Knox. "Euripides" in The Cambridge History of Classical Literature I: Greek Literature, P. Easterling and B. Knox (ed.s), Cambridge University Press (1985), page 339 ^ Banham, Martin, ed. 1998. The Cambridge Guide to Theatre. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-43437-8. ^ Brockett, Oscar G. and Franklin J. Hildy. 2003. History of the Theatre. Ninth edition, International edition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. ISBN 0-205-41050-2. ^ Aristophanes: Clouds K.J. Dover (ed), Oxford University Press 1970, Intro. page X. ^ David Barrett's edition Aristophanes: the Frogs and Other Plays (Penguin Classics, 1964), p. 13 ^ Roche, Paul (2005). Aristophanes: The Complete Plays: A New Translation by Paul Roche. New York: New American Library. pp. x–xi. ISBN 978-0-451-21409-6. ^ Roche, Paul (2005). Aristophanes: The Complete Plays: A New Translation by Paul Roche. New York: New American Library. pp. 537–540. ISBN 978-0-451-21409-6. ^ Garland, Robert (2008). Ancient Greece: Everyday Life in the Birthplace of Western Civilization. New York City, New York: Sterling. p. 288. ISBN 978-1-4549-0908-8. ^ Hall, Edith; Wrigley, Amanda (2007). Aristophanes in Performance, 421 BC-AD 2007: Peace, Birds and Frogs. ISBN 9781904350613. Retrieved 5 April 2011. ^ Euripides. McHugh, Heather, trans. Cyclops; Greek Tragedy in New Translations. Oxford Univ. Press (2001) ISBN 978-0-19-803265-6 ^ Hunt, A.S. (1912) The Oxyrhynchus Papyri: Part IX. London. ^ T. James Luce, The Greek Historians, 2002, p. 26. ^ Procopius, John Moorhead, Encyclopedia of Historians and Historical Writing: M–Z, Vol. II, Kelly Boyd, (Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers, 1999), 962 ^ Xenophon, Hellenica 7.5.27; Xenophon. Xenophontis opera omnia, vol. 1. Oxford, Clarendon Press. 1900, repr. 1968 ^ Danzig, Gabriel. 2003. "Apologizing for Socrates: Plato and Xenophon on Socrates' Behavior in Court." Transactions of the American Philological Association. Vol. 133, No. 2, pp. 281–321. ^ G. S. Kirk and J. E. Raven and M. Schofield, The Presocratic Philosophers (Cambridge University Press, 1983, 108–109. ^ Curd, Patricia, A Presocratics Reader: Selected Fragments and Testimonia (Hackett Publishing, 1996), p. 12. ^  One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Smith, William, ed. (1870). "Pythagoras". Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology. pp. 616–625. ^ Simon Trépanier, (2004), Empedocles: An Interpretation, Routledge. ^ Kahn, Charles H. (1979). The Art and Thought of Heraclitus. An Edition of the Fragments with Translation and Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-21883-7. ^ Berryman, Sylvia. "Democritus". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University. Retrieved 25 March 2017. ^ Kofman, Sarah (1998). Socrates: Fictions of a Philosopher. p. 34. ISBN 0-8014-3551-X. ^ Cohen, M., Philosophical Tales: Being an Alternative History Revealing the Characters, the Plots, and the Hidden Scenes that Make Up the True Story of Philosophy, John Wiley & Sons, 2008, p. 5, ISBN 1-4051-4037-2. ^ Rubel, A.; Vickers, M. (11 September 2014). Fear and Loathing in Ancient Athens: Religion and Politics During the Peloponnesian War. Routledge. p. 147. ISBN 978-1-317-54480-7. ^ Dorion, Louis-André. The Rise and Fall of the Socratic Problem (pp. 1–23) (The Cambridge Companion to Socrates). Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CCOL9780521833424.001. hdl:10795/1977. ISBN 978-0-521-83342-4. Retrieved 2015-05-07. ^ Henri Estienne (ed.), Platonis opera quae extant omnia, Vol. 1, 1578, p. 17. ^ Lorenz, Hendrik (22 April 2009). "Ancient Theories of Soul". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 2013-12-10. ^ Plato, The Symposium. Translation and introduction by Walter Hamilton. Penguin Classics. 1951. ISBN 978-0-14-044024-9 ^ National Public Radio (August 8, 2007). Plato's 'Republic' Still Influential, Author Says. Talk of the Nation. ^ Plato: The Republic. Plato: His Philosophy and his life, allphilosophers.com ^ Baird, Forrest E.; Walter Kaufmann (2008). From Plato to Derrida. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall. ISBN 978-0-13-158591-1. ^ Magee, Bryan (2010). The Story of Philosophy. Dorling Kindersley. p. 34. ^ Morison, William (2006). "The Lyceum". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 30 October 2009. ^ "Great Philosophers: Aristotle (384-322 BCE)". Great Philosophers. Oregon State University. Retrieved 23 June 2017. ^ Bury, J. B. (1937). A History of Greece to the Death of Alexander the Great. New York: Modern Library. pp. 668–723. ^ Bury, J. B. (1937). A History of Greece to the Death of Alexander the Great. New York: Modern Library. pp. 724–821. ^ Entry Μουσείον at Liddell & Scott ^ Phillips, Heather A. (August 2010). "The Great Library of Alexandria?". Library Philosophy and Practice. ISSN 1522-0222. Archived from the original on 2012-04-18. Retrieved 2017-05-17. ^ Introduction (p.14) to Virgil: The Eclogues trans. Guy Lee (Penguin Classics) ^ Article on "Bucolic poetry" in The Oxford Companion to Classical Literature (1989) ^ a b c d e f g Harder, Annette (2012). Callimachus: Aetia. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. pp. 1–5. ISBN 978-0-19-958101-6. ^ Nisetich, Frank (2001). The Poems of Callimachus. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. pp. xviii–xx. ISBN 0-19814760-0. Retrieved 27 July 2017. ^ Blum 1991, p. 236, cited in Phillips, Heather A. (August 2010). "The Great Library of Alexandria?". Library Philosophy and Practice. ISSN 1522-0222. Archived from the original on 2012-04-18. Retrieved 2017-05-17. ^ Stephens, Susan (2011), "Ptolemaic Epic", in T. Papaghelis; A. Rengakos (eds.), Brill's Companion to Apollonius Rhodius; Second (Revised ed.), Brill ^ A. W. Mair and G. R. Mair, trans., Callimachus and Lycophron; Aratus, Loeb Classical Library (New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1921), p. 363 ^ Konstan, David (2010). Menander of Athens. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 3–6. ISBN 0-19-980519-9. ^ Baron, Christopher A. (2013). Timaeus of Tauromenium and Hellenistic Historiography. Cambridge University Press. ^ Brown, Truesdell S. (1958). Timaeus of Tauromenium. Berkeley: University of California Press. ^ Marincola, John, ed. A companion to Greek and Roman historiography. John Wiley & Sons, 2010, 528-531. ^ Bergmann, Uwe. "X-Ray Fluorescence Imaging of the Archimedes Palimpsest: A Technical Summary" (PDF). Retrieved 2013-09-29. ^ Walsh, P.G. (1968). "Lucius Madaurensis". Phoenix. 22 (2): 143–157. doi:10.2307/1086837. JSTOR 1086837. ^ Apuleius Madaurensis, Lucius; trans. Lindsay, Jack (1960). The Golden Ass. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press. p. 31. ISBN 0-253-20036-9. ^ Edmund P. Cueva (Fall 1996). "Plutarch's Ariadne in Chariton's Chaereas and Callirhoe". American Journal of Philology. 117 (3): 473–484. doi:10.1353/ajp.1996.0045. ^ Cf. Thomas Hägg, 'The Oriental Reception of Greek Novels: A Survey with Some Preliminary Considerations', Symbolae Osloenses, 61 (1986), 99–131 (p. 106), doi:10.1080/00397678608590800. ^ Thomas Hägg and Bo Utas, The Virgin and Her Lover: Fragments of an Ancient Greek Novel and a Persian Epic Poem. Brill Studies in Middle Eastern Literatures, 30 (Leiden: Brill, 2003), p. 1. ^ Reardon, Bryan P. (1989). Collected Ancient Greek Novels. Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 809–810. ISBN 0-520-04306-5. Retrieved 31 May 2017. ^ Metzger, Bruce M. (1987). The Canon of the New Testament: Its Origin, Development, and Significance (PDF). pp. 295–296. ISBN 0-19-826180-2. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-06-01. ^ Trobisch, David (1994). Paul's Letter Collection: Tracing the Origins. pp. 1–27. ISBN 0-8006-2597-8. ^ Thomas Christian Tychsen, Quinti Smyrnaei Posthomericorum libri XIV. Nunc primum ad librorum manoscriptorum fidem et virorum doctorum coniecturas recensuit, restituit et supplevit Thom. Christ. Tychsen acceserunt observationes Chr. Gottl. Heynii (Strassburg: Typhographia Societatis Bipontinae) 1807. ^ Armin H. Köchly, Quinti Smyrnaei Posthomericorum libri XIV. Recensuit, prolegomenis et adnotatione critica instruxit Arminius Koechly (Leipzig: Weidmannos) 1850. ^ A.S. Way, Introduction 1913. ^ Vian, Francis. '"Mârtus" chez Nonnos de Panopolis. Étude de sémantique et de chronologie.' REG 110, 1997, 143-60. Reprinted in: L'Épopée posthomérique. Recueil d'études. Ed. Domenico Accorinti. Alessandria: Edizioni dell'Orso, 2005 (Hellenica 17), 565-84 ^ Cameron (2016). sfnp error: no target: CITEREFCameron2016 (help) ^ Agathias Scholasticus, Hist. 4.23. (530 x 580) ^ Fornaro, S. s.v. Nonnus in Brill's New Pauly vol. 9 (ed. Canick & Schneider) (Leiden, 2006) col.812–815 ^ "Titus Livius (Livy), The History of Rome, Book 39, chapter 35". www.perseus.tufts.edu. Retrieved 2016-11-02. ^ Sacks, Kenneth S. (1990). Diodorus Siculus and the First Century. Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-03600-4. ^ T. Hidber. Encyclopedia of Ancient Greece (p.229). Routledge 31 Oct 2013, 832 pages, ISBN 1-136-78799-2, (editor N. Wilson). Retrieved 2015-09-07. ^ White, Horace (1912). "Introduction". Appian's Roman History. Cambridge, Mass: The Loeb Classical Library. pp. vii–xii. ISBN 0-674-99002-1. ^ FW Walbank (November 1984). F. W. Walbank (ed.). The Cambridge Ancient History. Cambridge University Press, 6 Sep 1984. ISBN 0-521-23445-X. Retrieved 2015-04-01. ^ "Plutarch". Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy. ^ Stadter, Philip A. (2015). Plutarch and His Roman Readers. Oxford University Press. p. 69. ISBN 978-0-19-871833-8. Retrieved 2015-02-04. Although Plutarch wrote in Greek and with a Greek point of view, [...] he was thinking of a Roman as well as a Greek audience. ^ Ramsay, William (1867), "A. Gellius", in Smith, William, Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology, 2, Boston, p. 235 ^ Ἀθήναιος [Athenaeus]. Δειπνοσοφισταί [Deipnosophistaí, Sophists at Dinner], c. 3rd century (Ancient Greek) Trans. Charles Burton Gulick as Athenaeus, Vol. I, p. viii. Harvard University Press (Cambridge), 1927. Accessed 13 Aug 2014. ^ Aelian, Historical Miscellany. Translated by Nigel G. Wilson. 1997. Loeb Classical Library. ISBN 978-0-674-99535-2 ^ Dueck, Daniela (2000). Strabo of Amasia: A Greek Man of Letters in Augustan Rome. London, New York: Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group. p. 145. ISBN 0-415-21672-9. ^ Historical and Ethnological Society of Greece, Aristéa Papanicolaou Christensen, The Panathenaic Stadium – Its History Over the Centuries (2003), p. 162 ^ Pausanias, --. Description of Greece: Complete. First Rate Publishers. ISBN 978-1-5028-8547-0.CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) ^ "Ptolemy | Accomplishments, Biography, & Facts". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 2016-03-06. ^ A. I. Sabra, "Configuring the Universe: Aporetic, Problem Solving, and Kinematic Modeling as Themes of Arabic Astronomy," Perspectives on Science 6.3 (1998): 288–330, at pp. 317–18 ^ NT Hamilton, N. M. Swerdlow, G. J. Toomer. "The Canobic Inscription: Ptolemy's Earliest Work". In Berggren and Goldstein, eds., From Ancient Omens to Statistical Mechanics. Copenhagen: University Library, 1987. ^ Fraser, Craig G. (2006). The Cosmos: A Historical Perspective. p. 14. ^ Lattis, James L. (1995). Between Copernicus and Galileo: Christoph Clavius and the Collapse of Ptolemaic Cosmology, University of Chicago Press, pgs 186–190 ^ Epictetus, Discourses, prologue. ^ Long, Herbert S. (1972). Introduction. Lives of Eminent Philosophers. By Laërtius, Diogenes. 1 (reprint ed.). Loeb Classical Library. p. xvi. ^ "Diogenes Laërtius", The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, 2013 ^  Laërtius, Diogenes (1925c). "Epicurus" . Lives of the Eminent Philosophers. 2:10. Translated by Hicks, Robert Drew (Two volume ed.). Loeb Classical Library.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link) ^ Philip Merlan, From Platonism to Neoplatonism (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1954, 1968), p. 3. ^ Detlef Thiel: Die Philosophie des Xenokrates im Kontext der Alten Akademie, München 2006, pp. 197ff. and note 64; Jens Halfwassen: Der Aufstieg zum Einen. ^ "Who was Plotinus?". ^ New Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge 3rd ed. 1914. Pg 284 ^ Moore, Edward. "Origen of Alexandria (entry in the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy)". The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. IEP. ISSN 2161-0002. Retrieved 2014-04-27. ^ Schaff, Philip (1910). The new Schaff-Herzog encyclopedia of religious knowledge: embracing biblical, historical, doctrinal, and practical theology and biblical, theological, and ecclesiastical biography from the earliest times to the present day. Funk and Wagnalls Company. p. 272. Retrieved 2014-07-30. ^ Herzog, Johann Jakob; Philip Schaff; Albert Hauck (December 1908). "Celsus". In Samual Macauley Jackson (ed.). The New Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge. II. New York and London: Funk and Wagnalls Company. p. 466. ^ The "early dating of P.Oxy 3836 holds, Achilles Tatius' novel must have been written 'nearer 120 than 150'" Albert Henrichs, Culture In Pieces: Essays on Ancient Texts in Honour of Peter Parsons, eds. Dirk Obbink, Richard Rutherford, Oxford University Press, 2011, p. 309, n. 29 ISBN 0-19-929201-9, 9780199292011 ^ "the use (albeit mid and erratic) of the Attic dialect suggest a date a little earlier [than mid-2nd century] in the same century." The Greek Novel: Oxford Bibliographies Online Research Guide Oxford University Press, 2010, p. 7 ISBN 0-19-980303-X, 9780199803033 ^ a b Longus; Xenophon of Ephesus (2009), Henderson, Jeffery, ed., Anthia and Habrocomes (translation), Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, pp. 69 & 127, ISBN 978-0-674-99633-5 ^ Richard Hunter (1996). "Longus, Daphnis and Chloe". In Gareth L. Schmeling (ed.). The Novel in the Ancient World. Brill. pp. 361–86. ISBN 90-04-09630-2. ^ J.R. Morgan. Lucian's True Histories and the Wonders Beyond Thule of Antonius Diogenes. The Classical Quarterly (New Series), 35, pp 475–490 doi:10.1017/S0009838800040313. ^ Moeser, Marion (Dec 15, 2002). The Anecdote in Mark, the Classical World and the Rabbis: A Study of Brief Stories in the Demonax, The Mishnah, and Mark 8:27–10:45. A&C Black. p. 88. ISBN 978-0-8264-6059-2. Retrieved 16 September 2016. ^ Lightfoot, De Dea Syria (2003) ^ Lucinda Dirven, "The Author of De Dea Syria and his Cultural Heritage", Numen 44.2 (May 1997), pp. 153–179. ^ Greg Grewell: "Colonizing the Universe: Science Fictions Then, Now, and in the (Imagined) Future", Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature, Vol. 55, No. 2 (2001), pp. 25–47 (30f.) ^ Fredericks, S.C.: "Lucian's True History as SF", Science Fiction Studies, Vol. 3, No. 1 (March 1976), pp. 49–60 ^ "The Doubter" by Lucian in Roger Lancelyn Green (1970) Thirteen Uncanny Tales. London, Dent: 14–21; and Finucane, pg 26. ^ George Luck "Witches and Sorcerers in Classical Literature", p. 141, Witchcraft and Magic in Europe: Ancient Greece And Rome edited by Bengt Ankarloo and Stuart Clark ISBN 0-8122-1705-5 ^ Robert E. Van Voorst, Jesus outside the New Testament, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2000. ^ Holzberg, Niklas. The Ancient Novel. 1995. p. 78 ^ Bowersock, Glanwill W. The Aethiopica of Heliodorus and the Historia Augusta. In: Historiae Augustae Colloquia n.s. 2, Colloquium Genevense 1991. p. 43. ^ a b Reardon, Bryan P. (1989). Collected Ancient Greek Novels. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 0-520-04306-5. Retrieved 22 June 2017. ^ a b "Western literature". Encyclopaedia Britannica. Encyclopaedia Britannica. Retrieved 19 June 2017. ^ English translations of Musaeus Grammaticus' Hero and Leander: The Divine Poem of Musaeus: First of All Books Translated According to the Original (George Chapman, 1616); Hero & Leander (E.E. Sikes, 1920) ^ Jenkyns, Richard (2007). Classical Epic: Homer and Virgil. London: Duckworth. p. 53. ISBN 978-1-85399-133-2. ^ Sandys, Sir John Edwin (1921). A History of Classical Scholarship; Volume One: From the Sixth Century B.C. to the End of the Middle Ages (3 ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. p. 591. ISBN 978-1-108-02706-9. Retrieved 24 March 2017. ^ Western Civilization: Ideas, Politics, and Society, Marvin Perry, Myrna Chase, Margaret C. Jacob, James R. Jacob, 2008, 903 pages, p.261/262. ^ Reynolds and Wilson, pp. 119, 131. ^ W. W. Combs, Erasmus and the textus receptus, DBSJ 1 (Spring 1996), 45. ^ Meagher, Robert E. (2002). The Meaning of Helen: In Search of an Ancient Icon. Wauconda, Illinois: Bolchazy-Carducci Publishers. p. 56. ISBN 0-86516-510-6. Retrieved 19 June 2017. ^ Osborn, Kevin; Burgess, Dana (1998-07-01). The Complete Idiot's Guide to Classical Mythology. Penguin. pp. 270–. ISBN 9780028623856. Retrieved 19 December 2012. ^ a b c d Grafton, Anthony; Most, Glenn W.; Settis, Salvatore (2010). The Classical Tradition. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-03572-0. ^ Armstrong, A. Macc. "Timon of Athens - A Legendary Figure?", Greece & Rome, 2nd Ser., Vol. 34, No. 1 (April 1987), pp. 7–11 ^ Reardon, Bryan P. (1989). Collected Ancient Greek Novels. Berkeley: University of California Press. p. 737. ISBN 0-520-04306-5. Retrieved 17 June 2017. ^ Kirk, G. S. (1976). Homer and the Oral Tradition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. pp. 85–99. ISBN 978-0-521-13671-6. Homeric style. ^ Osgood, Charles Grosvenor (1900). The Classical Mythology of Milton's English Poems. New York City, New York: Henry Holt. p. ix-xi. Retrieved 5 June 2017. ^ Richard, Carl J., The Golden Age of the Classics in America, Harvard University Press, 2009, page 33. ^ Harte, Tim (Summer 2003). "Sarah Danius, The Senses of Modernism: Technology, Perception, and Aesthetics". Bryn Mawr Review of Comparative Literature. 4 (1). Archived from the original on 2003-11-05. Retrieved 2001-07-10. (review of Danius book). ^ Kiberd, Declan (16 June 2009). "Ulysses, Modernism's Most Sociable Masterpiece". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 28 June 2011. ^ Jaurretche, Colleen (2005). Beckett, Joyce and the Art of the Negative. European Joyce studies. 16. Rodopi. p. 29. ISBN 978-90-420-1617-0. Retrieved February 1, 2011. ^ Ellmann, Richard. James Joyce. Oxford University Press, revised edition (1983). ^ "Who was Mary Renault?". The Mary Renault Society. The Mary Renault Society. Retrieved 31 May 2017. ^ Forster, E. M.; Hans-Georg, Gadamer. "Aristotle:Poetics". CriticaLink. University of Hawaii. Retrieved 25 June 2017. ^ Habib, M.A.R. (2005). A History of Literary Criticism and Theory: From Plato to the Present. Wiley-Blackwell. p. 60. ISBN 0-631-23200-1. ^ "Catharsis". Encyclopaedia Britannica. Encyclopaedia Britannica. Retrieved 25 June 2017. ^ "Ethos". Encyclopaedia Britannica. Encyclopaedia Britannica. Retrieved 25 June 2017. ^ "Anagnorisis". Encyclopaedia Britannica. Encyclopaedia Britannica. Retrieved 25 June 2017. ^ "Hamartia". Encyclopaedia Britannica. Encyclopaedia Britannica. Retrieved 25 June 2017. ^ "Hubris". Encyclopaedia Britannica. Encyclopaedia Britannica. Retrieved 25 June 2017. ^ "Mimesis". Encyclopaedia Britannica. Encyclopaedia Britannica. Retrieved 25 June 2017. ^ "Plot". Encyclopaedia Britannica. Encyclopaedia Britannica. Retrieved 25 June 2017. ^ "Nemesis". Encyclopaedia Britannica. Encyclopaedia Britannica. Retrieved 25 June 2017. ^ "Peripeteia". Encyclopaedia Britannica. Encyclopaedia Britannica. Retrieved 25 June 2017. Further reading[edit] Beye, Charles Rowan (1987). Ancient Greek Literature and Society. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press. ISBN 0-8014-1874-7. Easterling, P.E.; Knox, B.M.W., eds. (1985). The Cambridge History of Classical Literature: Volume 1: Greek literature. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire]; New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-21042-9. Flacelière, Robert (1964). A Literary History of Greece. (Translated by Douglas Garman). Chicago: Aldine Pub. Co. Gutzwiller, Kathryn (2007). A Guide to Hellenistic Literature. Blackwell. ISBN 978-0-631-23322-0. Hadas, Moses (1950). A History of Greek Literature. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. Lesky, Albin (1966). A History of Greek Literature. Translated by James Willis; Cornelis de Heer. Indianapolis / Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc. ISBN 0-87220-350-6. Schmidt, Michael (2004). The First Poets: Lives of the Ancient Greek Poets. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson. ISBN 0-297-64394-0. C. A. Trypanis (1981). Greek Poetry from Homer to Seferis. University of Chicago Press. Whitmarsh, Tim (2004). Ancient Greek Literature. Cambridge: Polity Press. ISBN 0-7456-2792-7. External links[edit] Library resources about Ancient Greek literature Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries Works related to Ancient Greek literature at Wikisource Ancient Greek Literature Library - Found at Demonax.info v t e Ancient Greece Timeline History Geography Periods Cycladic civilization Minoan civilization Mycenaean civilization Greek Dark Ages Archaic period Classical Greece Hellenistic Greece Roman Greece Geography Aegean Sea Aeolis Alexandria Antioch Cappadocia Crete Cyprus Doris Ephesus Epirus Hellespont Ionia Ionian Sea Macedonia Magna Graecia Miletus Peloponnesus Pergamon Pontus Taurica Ancient Greek colonies City states Politics Military City states Argos Athens Byzantion Chalcis Corinth Eretria Kerkyra Larissa Megalopolis Megara Rhodes Samos Sparta Syracuse Thebes Politics Boule Koinon Proxeny Tagus Tyrant Amphictyonic League Athenian Agora Areopagus Ecclesia Graphe paranomon Heliaia Ostracism Spartan Apella Ephor Gerousia Macedon Synedrion Koinon Military Wars Athenian military Scythian archers Antigonid Macedonian army Army of Macedon Ballista Cretan archers Hellenistic armies Hippeis Hoplite Hetairoi Macedonian phalanx Phalanx Peltast Pezhetairos Sarissa Sacred Band of Thebes Sciritae Seleucid army Spartan army Strategos Toxotai Xiphos Xyston People List of ancient Greeks Rulers Kings of Argos Archons of Athens Kings of Athens Kings of Commagene Diadochi Kings of Lydia Kings of Macedonia Kings of Paionia Attalid kings of Pergamon Kings of Pontus Kings of Sparta Tyrants of Syracuse Philosophers Anaxagoras Anaximander Anaximenes Antisthenes Aristotle Democritus Diogenes of Sinope Empedocles Epicurus Gorgias Heraclitus Hypatia Leucippus Parmenides Plato Protagoras Pythagoras Socrates Thales Zeno Authors Aeschylus Aesop Alcaeus Archilochus Aristophanes Bacchylides Euripides Herodotus Hesiod Hipponax Homer Ibycus Lucian Menander Mimnermus Panyassis Philocles Pindar Plutarch Polybius Sappho Simonides Sophocles Stesichorus Theognis Thucydides Timocreon Tyrtaeus Xenophon Others Agesilaus II Agis II Alcibiades Alexander the Great Aratus Archimedes Aspasia Demosthenes Epaminondas Euclid Hipparchus Hippocrates Leonidas Lycurgus Lysander Milo of Croton Miltiades Pausanias Pericles Philip of Macedon Philopoemen Praxiteles Ptolemy Pyrrhus Solon Themistocles Groups Philosophers Playwrights Poets Tyrants By culture Ancient Greek tribes Thracian Greeks Ancient Macedonians Society Culture Society Agriculture Calendar Clothing Coinage Cuisine Economy Education Festivals Homosexuality Law Olympic Games Pederasty Philosophy Prostitution Religion Slavery Warfare Wedding customs Wine Arts and science Architecture Greek Revival architecture Astronomy Literature Mathematics Medicine Music Musical system Pottery Sculpture Technology Theatre Religion Funeral and burial practices Mythology mythological figures Temple Twelve Olympians Underworld Sacred places Eleusis Delphi Delos Dion Dodona Mount Olympus Olympia Structures Athenian Treasury Lion Gate Long Walls Philippeion Theatre of Dionysus Tunnel of Eupalinos Temples Aphaea Artemis Athena Nike Erechtheion Hephaestus Hera, Olympia Parthenon Samothrace Zeus, Olympia Language Proto-Greek Mycenaean Homeric Dialects Aeolic Arcadocypriot Attic Doric Ionic Locrian Macedonian Pamphylian Koine Writing Linear A Linear B Cypriot syllabary Greek alphabet Greek numerals Attic numerals Greek colonisation South Italy Alision Brentesion Caulonia Chone Croton Cumae Elea Heraclea Lucania Hipponion Hydrus Krimisa Laüs Locri Medma Metapontion Neápolis Pandosia (Lucania) Poseidonia Pixous Rhegion Scylletium Siris Sybaris Sybaris on the Traeis Taras Terina Thurii Sicily Akragas Akrai Akrillai Apollonia Calacte Casmenae Catana Gela Helorus Henna Heraclea Minoa Himera Hybla Gereatis Hybla Heraea Kamarina Leontinoi Megara Hyblaea Messana Naxos Segesta Selinous Syracuse Tauromenion Thermae Tyndaris Aeolian Islands Didyme Euonymos Ereikousa Hycesia Lipara/Meligounis Phoenicusa Strongyle Therassía Sardinia Olbia Cyrenaica Balagrae Barca Berenice Cyrene (Apollonia) Ptolemais Iberian Peninsula Akra Leuke Alonis Emporion Helike Hemeroscopion Kalathousa Kypsela Mainake Menestheus's Limin Illicitanus Limin/Portus Illicitanus Rhode Salauris Zacynthos Black Sea north coast Borysthenes Charax Chersonesus Dioscurias Eupatoria Gorgippia Hermonassa Kepoi Kimmerikon Myrmekion Nikonion Nymphaion Olbia Panticapaion Phanagoria Pityus Tanais Theodosia Tyras Tyritake Black Sea south coast Dionysopolis Odessos Anchialos Mesambria Apollonia Salmydessus Heraclea Tium Sesamus Cytorus Abonoteichos Sinope Zaliche Amisos Oinòe Polemonion Thèrmae Cotyora Kerasous Tripolis Trapezous Rhizos Athina Bathus Phasis Lists Cities in Epirus People Place names Stoae Temples Theatres Category Portal Outline v t e Greek language Origin and genealogy Proto-Greek Pre-Greek substrate Graeco-Armenian Graeco-Aryan Graeco-Phrygian Hellenic languages Periods Mycenaean Greek (c. 1600–1100 BC) Ancient Greek (c. 800–300 BC) Koine Greek (c. 300 BC–AD 330) Medieval Greek (c. 330–1453) Modern Greek (since 1453) Varieties Ancient Aeolic Arcadocypriot Attic and Ionic Doric (Epirote) Homeric Locrian Pamphylian Macedonian Koine Jewish Koine Greek Modern Demotic Katharevousa Cappadocian Misthiotika Cretan Cypriot Himariote Istanbul Italiot Greco/Calabrian Griko/Apulian Maniot Mariupolitan Pontic Tsakonian Yevanic Phonology Ancient (accent/teaching) Koine Standard Modern Grammar Ancient Koine Standard Modern Writing systems Cypriot syllabary Linear B Greek alphabet History Archaic forms Attic numerals Greek numerals Orthography Diacritics Braille Cyrillization and Romanization Greeklish Literature Ancient Byzantine Modern Promotion and study Hellenic Foundation for Culture Center for the Greek Language Other Greek language question Exonyms Morphemes in English Terms of endearment Place names Proverbs Greek Language Day Comparison of Ancient Greek dictionaries v t e European literature Abkhaz Albanian Anglo-Norman Aragonese Armenian Asturian Austrian Azerbaijani Basque Belarusian Belgian Bohemian Bosnian Breton British Bulgarian Catalan Chuvash Cornish Croatian Cypriot Czech Danish Dutch English Old English (Anglo-Saxon) Middle English Estonian Faroese Finnish Flemish French Frisian Friulian Gaelic Galician German Greek ancient medieval modern Greenlandic Hungarian Icelandic Irish Northern Irish Italian Jèrriais Kazakh Kosovar Latin Latvian Lithuanian Luxembourg Macedonian Maltese Manx Montenegrin Norwegian Occitan (Provençal) Old Norse Ossetian Polish Portuguese Romanian Russian Sardinian Scottish Scots Scottish Gaelic Serbian Slovak Slovene Spanish Swedish Swiss Turkish Turkish Cypriot Ukrainian Venetian Welsh in English in Welsh Western Lombard Yiddish Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ancient_Greek_literature&oldid=995592115#Hellenistic_poetry" Categories: Ancient Greek literature Greek literature Ancient Greek culture Arts in ancient Greece History of literature Ancient Greek language Western culture Literature by language European literature Hidden categories: Articles containing Ancient Greek (to 1453)-language text Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the DGRBM Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the DGRBM without a Wikisource reference Wikipedia articles incorporating text from the DGRBM Harv and Sfn no-target errors CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list CS1 maint: ref=harv Wikipedia articles incorporating the template Lives of the Eminent Philosophers Good articles Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages العربية Беларуская Български Čeština Cymraeg Eesti Ελληνικά Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français 한국어 Hrvatski Ido Bahasa Indonesia Íslenska Italiano עברית ქართული Қазақша Latviešu Lietuvių Lingua Franca Nova Magyar Македонски Nederlands Norsk bokmål Occitan Polski Română Русский Sicilianu Slovenščina Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska ไทย Türkçe Українська اردو 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 21 December 2020, at 22:08 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1752 ---- Lucania - Wikipedia Lucania From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search For other uses, see Lucania (disambiguation). Map of ancient Lucania Lucania (Greek: Λευκανία, translit. Leukanía, lit. "Lefkanía (Modern Greek)") was a historical region of Southern Italy. It was the land of the Lucani, an Oscan people. It extended from the Tyrrhenian Sea to the Gulf of Taranto. It bordered with Samnium and Campania in the north, Apulia in the east, and Bruttium in the south-west, at the tip of the peninsula which is now called Calabria. It thus comprised almost all the modern region of Basilicata, the southern part of the Province of Salerno (the Cilento area) and a northern portion of the Province of Cosenza. The precise limits were the river Silarus in the north-west, which separated it from Campania, and the Bradanus, which flows into the Gulf of Taranto, in the east. The lower tract of the river Laus, which flows from a ridge of the Apennine Mountains to the Tyrrhenian Sea in an east-west direction, marked part of the border with Bruttium. Contents 1 Geography 2 Etymology 3 History 4 Cities and towns 5 Later use 6 Notes 7 References Geography[edit] Almost the whole area is occupied by the Apennine Mountains, which here are an irregular group of lofty masses. The main ridge approaches the western sea, and continues from the lofty knot of mountains on the frontiers of Samnium, in a mostly southerly direction, to within a few miles of the Gulf of Policastro. From then on it is separated from the sea by only a narrow interval until it enters Bruttium. Just within the frontier of Lucania rises Monte Pollino, 7,325 ft (2,233 m), the highest peak in the southern Apennines. The mountains descend in a much more gradual slope to the coastal plain of the Gulf of Taranto. Thus the rivers which flow to the Tyrrhenian Sea are of little importance compared with those that descend towards the Gulf of Tarentum. Of these the most important are the Bradanus (Bradano), the Casuentus (Basento), the Aciris (Agri), and the Siris (Sinni). The Crathis, which forms at its mouth the southern limit of the province, belongs almost wholly to the territory of the Bruttii, but it receives a tributary, the Sybaris (Coscile), from the mountains of Lucania. The only considerable stream on the western side is the Silarus (Sele), which constitutes the northern boundary, and has two important tributaries in the Calor (Calore Lucano or Calore Salernitano) and the Tanager (Tanagro or Negro) which joins it from the south. Etymology[edit] There are several hypotheses on the origin of the name Lucania, inhabited by Lucani, an Osco-Samnite population from central Italy. Lucania might be derived from Greek λευκός, leukos meaning "white", cognate of Latin lux ("light"). According to another hypothesis, Lucania might be derived from Latin word lucus meaning "sacred wood" (cognate of lucere), or from Greek λύκος, lykos meaning "wolf". History[edit] A mounted Lucani warrior, fresco from a tomb of Paestum, Italy, c. 360 BC The district of Lucania was so called from the people bearing the name Lucani (Lucanians) by whom it was conquered about the middle of the 5th century BC. Before that period it was included under the general name of Oenotria, which was applied by the Greeks to the southernmost portion of Italy. The mountainous interior was occupied by the tribes known as Oenotrians and Choni, while the coasts on both sides were occupied by powerful Greek colonies which doubtless exercised a protectorate over the interior (see Magna Graecia). The Lucanians were a southern branch of the Samnite or Sabellic people, who spoke the Oscan language. They had a democratic constitution save in time of war, when a dictator was chosen from among the regular magistrates. A few Oscan inscriptions survive, mostly in Greek characters, from the 4th or 3rd century BC, and some coins with Oscan legends of the 3rd century.[1] The Lucanians gradually conquered the whole country (with the exception of the Greek towns on the coast) from the borders of Samnium and Campania to the southern extremity of Italy. Subsequently the inhabitants of the peninsula, now known as Calabria, broke into insurrection, and under the name of Bruttians established their independence, after which the Lucanians became confined within the limits already described. After this we find them engaged in hostilities with the Tarentines, and with Alexander, king of Epirus, who was called in by that people to their assistance, 334 BC. In 298 BC (Livy x. II seq.) they made alliance with Rome, and Roman influence was extended by the colonies of Venusia (291 BC), Paestum (273), and above all Tarentum (272). Subsequently they were sometimes in alliance, but more frequently engaged in hostilities, during the Samnite wars. On the landing of Pyrrhus in Italy (281 BC) they were among the first to declare in his favor, and found themselves exposed to the resentment of Rome when the departure of Pyrrhus left his allies at the mercy of the Romans. After several campaigns they were reduced to subjection (272 BC). Notwithstanding this they espoused the cause of Hannibal during the Second Punic War (216 BC), and their territory during several campaigns was ravaged by both armies. The country never recovered from these disasters, and under the Roman government fell into decay, to which the Social War, in which the Lucanians took part with the Samnites against Rome (90–88 BC) gave the finishing stroke. In the time of Strabo the Greek cities on the coast had fallen into insignificance, and owing to the decrease of population and cultivation the malaria began to obtain the upper hand. The few towns of the interior were of no importance. A large part of the province was given up to pasture, and the mountains were covered with forests, which abounded in wild boars, bears and wolves. There were some fifteen independent communities, but none of great importance. For administrative purposes under the Roman empire, Lucania was always united with the district of the Bruttii, a practice continued by Theodoric.[2] The two together constituted the third region of Augustus. Cities and towns[edit] A Lucani man riding a chariot, from a tomb in Paestum, Italy, 4th century BC The towns on the east coast were Metapontum, a few miles south of the Bradanus; Heraclea, at the mouth of the Aciris; and Sins, on the river of the same name. Close to its southern frontier stood Sybaris, which was destroyed in 510 BC, but subsequently replaced by Thurii. On the west coast stood Posidonia, known under the Roman government as Paestum; below that came Elea (Velia under the Romans), Pyxus, called by the Romans Buxentum, and Laüs, near the frontier of the province towards Bruttium. Of the towns of the interior the most considerable was Potentia, still called Potenza. To the north, near the frontier of Apulia, was Bantia (Aceruntia belonged more properly to Apulia); while due south from Potentia was Grumentum, and still farther in that direction were Nerulum and Muranum. In the upland valley of the Tanagrus were Atina, Forum Popilii and Consilinum (near Sala Consilina); Eburi (Eboli) and Volceii (Buccino), though to the north of the Silarus, were also included in Lucania. The Via Popilia traversed the district from north to south, entering it at the northwestern extremity; the Via Herculia, coming southwards from the Via Appia and passing through Potentia and Grumentum, joined the Via Popilia near the southwestern edge of the district: while another nameless road followed the east coast and other roads of less importance ran west from Potentia to the Via Popilia, northeast to the Via Appia and east from Grumentum to the coast at Heraclea. Later use[edit] See also: Theme of Lucania The modern name Basilicata originates from the 10th century AD, when the area was under Byzantine control. During the early 19th century, during the Carbonari revolution of 1820–21, the region was renamed and divided into Eastern and Western Lucania (Lucania Orientale and Lucania Occidentale). From the latter half of the 19th century some residents campaigned to reinstate that name. In 1932 the Fascist regime changed the name to Lucania, as part of its appropriation of symbols from the Roman Empire. After the end of the war and Italy's defeat, the new government restored the name of Basilicata to the province in 1947. In the late 20th century, Lucania was still in vernacular use as a synonym to Basilicata.[3] Notes[edit] ^ see Conway, Italic Dialects, p. II sqq.; Mommsen, C.I.L. x. p. 2I; Roehl, Inscriptiones Graecae Antiquissimae, 547. ^ Cassiodorus: Chapter 1, Backgrounds and Some Dates Archived 2005-05-10 at the Wayback Machine ^ Guida d'Italia: Basilicata, Calabria. Touring club italiano (1980) ISBN 978-88-365-0021-5 p.11 References[edit]  This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Lucania". Encyclopædia Britannica. 17 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 92. Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lucania&oldid=991981265" Categories: Lucania Geography of Italy Roman Italy Coloniae (Roman) Hidden categories: Webarchive template wayback links Articles containing Ancient Greek (to 1453)-language text Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica with Wikisource reference Wikipedia articles incorporating text from the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Languages العربية Беларуская Български Bosanski Català Čeština Deutsch Ελληνικά Euskara فارسی Français Hrvatski Bahasa Indonesia Italiano עברית Lumbaart Polski Русский Sicilianu Slovenčina Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Türkçe Українська Edit links This page was last edited on 2 December 2020, at 21:07 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1762 ---- National Library of Latvia - Wikipedia National Library of Latvia From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia   (Redirected from LNB (identifier)) Jump to navigation Jump to search This article may be expanded with text translated from the corresponding article in Latvian. (January 2015) Click [show] for important translation instructions. View a machine-translated version of the Latvian article. Machine translation like DeepL or Google Translate is a useful starting point for translations, but translators must revise errors as necessary and confirm that the translation is accurate, rather than simply copy-pasting machine-translated text into the English Wikipedia. Do not translate text that appears unreliable or low-quality. If possible, verify the text with references provided in the foreign-language article. You must provide copyright attribution in the edit summary accompanying your translation by providing an interlanguage link to the source of your translation. A model attribution edit summary Content in this edit is translated from the existing Latvian Wikipedia article at [[:lv:Latvijas Nacionālā bibliotēka]]; see its history for attribution. You should also add the template {{Translated|lv|Latvijas Nacionālā bibliotēka}} to the talk page. For more guidance, see Wikipedia:Translation. This article may be expanded with text translated from the corresponding article in German. (January 2015) Click [show] for important translation instructions. View a machine-translated version of the German article. Machine translation like DeepL or Google Translate is a useful starting point for translations, but translators must revise errors as necessary and confirm that the translation is accurate, rather than simply copy-pasting machine-translated text into the English Wikipedia. Do not translate text that appears unreliable or low-quality. If possible, verify the text with references provided in the foreign-language article. You must provide copyright attribution in the edit summary accompanying your translation by providing an interlanguage link to the source of your translation. A model attribution edit summary Content in this edit is translated from the existing German Wikipedia article at [[:de:Lettische Nationalbibliothek]]; see its history for attribution. You should also add the template {{Translated|de|Lettische Nationalbibliothek}} to the talk page. For more guidance, see Wikipedia:Translation. National Library of Latvia Latvijas Nacionālā bibliotēka The main building of the National Library of Latvia in Riga Country Latvia Type National library Established 29 August 1919 (101 years ago) (1919-08-29) Location 2 buildings in Riga and in Ropaži Municipality Collection Size 4.2 million books and other publications Other information Director Andris Vilks Staff 372 Website https://www.lnb.lv Map The National Library of Latvia (Latvian: Latvijas Nacionālā bibliotēka), also known as Castle of Light (Gaismas pils), is a national cultural institution under the supervision of the Ministry of Culture of Latvia. The National Library of Latvia was formed in 1919 after the independent Republic of Latvia was proclaimed in 1918. The first supervisor of the Library was Jānis Misiņš, a librarian and the founder of the Latvian scientific bibliography (1862–1945). The current building was designed in 1989 by noted Latvian-American architect Gunnar Birkerts (1925-2017), who emigrated to the United States and made his career there. It was constructed in the early 21st century and opened in 2014. Today the Library plays an important role in the development of Latvia's information society, providing Internet access to residents and supporting research and lifelong education. The historical main building, Krišjāņa Barona iela 14 Contents 1 History 1.1 Interwar period 1.2 German and Soviet occupation 1.3 Renewed independence 2 Collections 3 Lettonica 4 New building 4.1 Current projects 5 See also 6 References 7 External links History[edit] Interwar period[edit] The National Library was founded on 29 August 1919, one year after independence, as the State Library (Valsts Bibliotēka).[1] Its first chief librarian and bibliographer was Jānis Misiņš (1862-1944), who made his immense private collection the basis of the new library.[2] Within a year, until 1920, the stocks had grown to 250,000 volumes.[3] Starting in the same year, all publishers were obliged to hand in a deposit copy of their works. Since 1927, the Library has published the National Bibliography of Latvia. There were significant additions in 1939 and 1940, when the State Library took over many of the libraries and collections of the Baltic Germans. Most resettled to the Nazi German Reich. Among these collections was a large part of the collection of the Society for History and Archaeology of Russia's Baltic Provinces, est. 1834, the primary historical society of the Baltic Germans.[1] In 1940, holdings encompassed 1.7 million volumes,[3] so that they had to be stored in two different locations in the Old Town (Jēkaba iela 6/8 and Anglikāņu iela 5). German and Soviet occupation[edit] During World War II, Germany invaded Latvia and occupied Riga (1941-1944). At that time, German authorities renamed the State Library as Country Library (Zemes bibliotēka), eliminating reference to a sovereign Latvian state). Following the war, Latvia was under Soviet rule, and the institution was known as State Library of the Latvian SSR (Latvijas PSR Valsts bibliotēka).[1] According to Soviet customs, in 1966 the library received an honorary name, commemorating Vilis Lācis, a writer and the late prime minister of Soviet Latvia. From 1946, literature deemed 'dangerous' from the Soviet perspective was withdrawn from the shelves and until 1988, when the Soviet Union gave up control, could be accessed only with a special permit. [4] In 1956, the State Library moved into a new building at Krišjāņa Barona iela. Renewed independence[edit] Since the reestablishment of Lativan national independence in 1991, the institution has been called National Library of Latvia. In 1995, it received as a permanent loan the Baltic Central Library of Otto Bong (1918-2006), a collection pertaining to the history, regional studies and languages of the Baltic countries.[5] In 2006, the National Library joined the European Library online service. Collections[edit] The Library's holdings today encompass more than 5 million titles, incl. about 18,000 manuscripts from the 14th century up to modern times.[6] One of the characteristic cornerstones of the NLL, which characterizes every national library, is the formation of the collection of national literature, its eternal storage and long-term access. The NLL is a centre of theoretical research and practical analyses of the activities of Latvian libraries. The Library carries out the functions of the centre of Latvia Interlibrary Loan, ensures the library and information service to the Parliament of the Republic of Latvia – the Saeima, implements the standardisation of the branch. Since the very outset, its main concern has been the national bibliography. The massive union catalogue Seniespiedumi latviešu valodā (Ancient Prints in Latvian 1525–1855, published in Riga, 1999)[7] received the Spīdola Prize in 2000 and was awarded The Beautiful Book of the Year 99.[8] In 2005, the Letonikas grāmatu autoru rādītājs (1523-1919) (Index of the Authors of Lettonica Books (1523–1919)) was published,[9] providing information about versatile branches of science and representatives of various nations, Latvia being the main focus of their publications. The NLL includes several collections of posters (artists Oskars Šteinbergs (1882–1937), Sigismunds Vidbergs (1890–1970), Raoul Dufy (1877–1953), Bernhard Borchert (1863–1945), Niklāvs Strunke (1894–1966) and others).[10] Lettonica[edit] Digitising collections at the NLL started in 1999. At present the Latvian National Digital Library Letonica, which was formed in 2006, holds digitized collections of newspapers, pictures, maps, books, sheet-music and audio recordings. In 2008 NLL launched two major digital projects. Periodika.lv is the NLL's collection of digitized historical periodicals in Latvian with the possibility to read full texts and search page by page.[11] Latvia has a tradition of Song and Dance Festivals organized every four years. The historical materials from the first Song Festival in 1864 till the Latgale Song Festival in 1940 can be explored in another digital collection of the National Library of Latvia.[12] New building[edit] Interior of the library Conference hall Ziedonis From the tower of St. Peter's Church An amphora-shaped sculpture in front of the library. The surface of the sculpture is covered in letters. The first discussions about the need for a new National Library began as early as 1928, and the significance of the project of this century was confirmed by high-level international recognition of the value of its collections. In 1999 almost all 170 UNESCO member states adopted a resolution during its General Conference,[13] calling on member states and the international community to ensure all possible support for the implementation of the NLL project. The continuous growth of the Library had made it necessary to transfer parts of the stocks into other buildings. By NLL had its holdings distributed among five locations in Riga.[14] Furthermore, since 1998, some stocks had to be stored in a depot in Silakrogs outside the capital.[4] The Parliament finally authorized a new building to be constructed on the left bank of the Daugava River. On 15 May 2008, after discussions lasting for many years, the state agency Three New Brothers and the Union of National Construction Companies signed the contract on the construction of the new National Library of Latvia. On 18 May 2014, the main facility of the Library at Krišjāņa Barona iela was closed for the move.[15] In 2008, construction started according to the design of noted Latvian-American architect Gunnar Birkerts, who had been based in the Detroit, Michigan area since the early 1950s.[16] He had been commissioned to design the building in 1989.[17] He was inspired by the Glass Mountain of Latvian mythology. The new building has 13 floors[18] and is 68 m high.[19] Construction costs were given as 193 million euros.[20] 480 people work there. As part of Riga's programme for its title as European Capital of Culture, selected holdings were symbolically carried from the old to the new building by a human chain on 18 January 2014. The new building was finally opened on 29 August that year, the Library's 95th anniversary.[21] Today the NLL building is a dominant landmark on the Riga cityscape. It has space for conferences and conventions, and other community events. Among others, it hosted the 4th summit of the EU's Eastern Partnership programme in May 2015,[22] and a debate chaired by the BBC's Jonathan Dimbleby on 14 March 2016.[23] Current projects[edit] LIBER 43rd Annual Conference Development of the digital library services Dissemination and Exploitation via Libraries: for Success and Sustainability of LLP Results Effective training tools application to qualification improvement in library sector (ETQI) Europeana Awareness Europeana Inside Europeana Newspapers Europeana Sounds The Exhibition "Book 1514–2014" and Academic readings "Content of the 21st Century" The Impact of Digital text and Multimedia Format on Childhood Learning: a Multidimensional Approach See also[edit] List of national libraries Latvian ISBN Agency References[edit] ^ a b c Klöker, Martin (2004). "Bibliotheksgeschichtliche Einleitung". In Garber, Klaus (ed.). Handbuch des personalen Gelegenheitsschrifttums in europäischen Bibliotheken und Archiven. Vol. 7: Riga - Tallinn. Part 3: Riga (in German). Hildesheim: Olms. p. 41. ISBN 3-487-11405-4. ^ Zanders, Viesturs (1997). "Bibliotheken in Lettland". In Fabian, Bernhard (ed.). Handbuch deutscher historischer Buchbestände in Europa. Eine Übersicht über Sammlungen in ausgewählten Bibliotheken. Bd. 7, Teil 2: Finnland, Estland, Lettland, Litauen (in German). Hildesheim: Olms. p. 145. ISBN 3-487-10361-3. ^ a b Zanders, Viesturs (1997). "Latvijas Nacionālā bibliotēka – Lettische Nationalbibliothek". In Fabian, Bernhard (ed.). Handbuch deutscher historischer Buchbestände in Europa. Eine Übersicht über Sammlungen in ausgewählten Bibliotheken. Bd. 7, Teil 2: Finnland, Estland, Lettland, Litauen. Hildesheim: Olms. p. 151. ^ a b "LNB vēstures fakti" (in Latvian). Retrieved 18 May 2014. ^ Zanders, Viesturs (1997). "Latvijas Nacionālā bibliotēka – Lettische Nationalbibliothek". In Fabian, Bernhard (ed.). Handbuch deutscher historischer Buchbestände in Europa. Eine Übersicht über Sammlungen in ausgewählten Bibliotheken. Bd. 7, Teil 2: Finnland, Estland, Lettland, Litauen. Hildesheim: Olms. p. 152. ^ Klöker, Martin (2004). "Bibliotheksgeschichtliche Einleitung". In Garber, Klaus (ed.). Handbuch des personalen Gelegenheitsschrifttums in europäischen Bibliotheken und Archiven. Vol. 7: Riga - Tallinn. Part 3: Riga (in German). Hildesheim: Olms. p. 42. ISBN 3-487-11405-4. ^ Šiško, Silvija, ed. (1999). Seniespiedumi latviešu valodā 1525–1855. Kopkatalogs / Die älteren Drucke in lettischer Sprache 1525–1855 (in Latvian and German). Riga: Latvijas Nacionālā Bibliotēka. ISBN 9984-607-19-4. ^ "About collection of NLL". lnb.lv. Retrieved 31 August 2008. ^ Bočarova, Rita, ed. (2005). Letonikas grāmatu autoru rādītājs (1523–1919) / Autoren-Verzeichnis der Lettonika-Bücher (in Latvian and German). Riga: Latvijas Nacionālā Bibliotēka. ISBN 9984-607-68-2. ^ "Treasures of the National Library of Latvia". theeuropeanlibrary.org. Retrieved 31 August 2008. ^ "Latvijas Nacionālā digitālā bibliotēka" (in Latvian). periodika.lv. Retrieved 2 September 2008. ^ "Latviešu Dziesmu svētki (1864–1940)" (in Latvian). lndb.lv. Retrieved 2 September 2008. ^ "Resolution 38 adopted at the 30th session of the UNESCO General Conference" (PDF). ^ "[Addresses of NLL's branches]" (in Latvian). Archived from the original on 19 May 2014. Retrieved 31 December 2013. ^ "[Press release]" (in Latvian). 15 May 2014. Retrieved 18 May 2014. ^ Berndsen, Silke (2010). "'Gut zehn Jahre haben wir über unsere Bibliothek diskutiert, aber gebaut haben wir sie nicht.' Die lettische Nationalbibliothek und ihr Neubau". Bibliotheksdienst (in German). 44: 930–940. ^ "Architekt: Nationalbibliothek ist Symbol für freies Lettland" (in German). 14 January 2014. Retrieved 17 January 2014. ^ Brill, Klaus (2 January 2014). "Die singende Schöne. Riga putzt sich für seine Rolle als Kulturhauptstadt Europas 2014 heraus". Süddeutsche Zeitung (in German). ^ "National Library of Latvia". Retrieved 17 January 2014. ^ "Jaunumi". Archived from the original on 22 July 2011. Retrieved 17 January 2014. ^ "Jaunā LNB ēka" (in Latvian). Retrieved 3 January 2015. ^ Brössler, Daniel (21 May 2015). "Geschichte schrreiben. Beim Gipfel in Riga wollen die Staats- und Regierungschefs der EU unter Beweis stellen, dass ihre Ostpolitik nicht gescheitert ist". Süddeutsche Zeitung (in German). p. 7. ^ BBC World Service report, 14 March 2016 External links[edit] Wikimedia Commons has media related to National Library of Latvia. Official site of the National Library of Latvia Project of the new building of the NLL Friends of the National Library of Latvia National Library of Latvia at Google Cultural Institute Message to the future readers Live from the construction site World Wide Science Coordinates: 56°57′03″N 24°07′15″E / 56.950882°N 24.120897°E / 56.950882; 24.120897 v t e Riga cityscape Old Town Castle Cat House Convent Yard Dannenstern House House of the Blackheads House of the Livonian Noble Corporation Large Guild Powder Tower Small Guild Swedish Gate Three Brothers Hotels Grand Palace Radisson Blu Daugava Gallery Park Monuments & memorials Brothers' Cemetery Bikernieki Memorial Forest Cemetery Freedom Monument Great Cemetery Pokrov Cemetery Monument to the Liberators of Soviet Latvia and Riga Parks & gardens Bastejkalns University of Latvia Botanical Garden Vērmane Garden Victory Park Museums & galleries Museum of the History of Riga and Navigation National Museum of Art Museum of the Occupation of Latvia The Ethnographic Open-Air Museum of Latvia Museum of Natural History War Museum Art Museum Riga Bourse Museum of National History Theatres Dailes Theatre Latvian National Opera Latvian National Theatre Palladium Riga New Riga Theatre Mikhail Chekhov Riga Russian Theatre Places of worship Nativity Cathedral Cathedral St. Peter's Church St. James's Cathedral Bridges Island Bridge Railway Bridge Southern Bridge Stone Bridge Vanšu Bridge Structures Radio and TV Tower Other National Library of Latvia Central Market Latvian Academy of Sciences Zoo Mežaparks Great Bandstand Palace of Justice Laima Clock Waterways Daugava River Streets Alberta iela Brīvības iela Kaļķu iela v t e National libraries of Europe Sovereign states Albania Andorra Armenia Austria Azerbaijan Belarus Belgium Bosnia and Herzegovina Bulgaria Croatia Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Georgia Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Italy Kazakhstan Latvia Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Malta Moldova Monaco Montenegro Netherlands North Macedonia Norway Poland Portugal Romania Russia San Marino Serbia Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey Ukraine United Kingdom Vatican City States with limited recognition Abkhazia Artsakh Kosovo Northern Cyprus South Ossetia Transnistria Dependencies and other entities Åland Faroe Islands Gibraltar Guernsey Isle of Man Jersey Svalbard Other entities European Union v t e Authority control files AAG • ACM DL • ADB • AGSA • autores.uy • AWR • BALaT • BIBSYS • Bildindex • BNC • BNE • BNF • Botanist • BPN • CANTIC • CiNii • CWGC • DAAO • DBLP • DSI • FNZA • GND • HDS • IAAF • ICCU • ICIA • ISNI • Joconde • KulturNav • LCCN • LIR • LNB • Léonore • MBA • MGP • NARA • NBL • NDL • NGV • NKC • NLA • NLG • NLI • NLK • NLP • NLR • NSK • NTA • ORCID • PIC • ResearcherID • RERO • RKD • RKDimages ID • RSL • SELIBR • SIKART • SNAC • SUDOC • S2AuthorId • TA98 • TDVİA • TE • TePapa • TH • TLS • Trove • UKPARL • ULAN • US Congress • VcBA • VIAF • WorldCat Identities Authority control BNF: cb15014038q (data) GND: 5198443-X ISNI: 0000 0001 1016 0284 LCCN: n93025426 LNB: 000001029 NKC: ko2003197165 SUDOC: 067152783 VcBA: 494/21831 VIAF: 148127403 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n93025426 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Library_of_Latvia&oldid=996081244" Categories: Library buildings completed in 1919 Buildings and structures in Riga Latvian culture National libraries Latvian digital libraries 1919 establishments in Latvia Libraries established in 1919 Deposit libraries Libraries in Latvia Hidden categories: CS1 German-language sources (de) CS1 Latvian-language sources (lv) Use dmy dates from November 2015 Articles to be expanded from January 2015 All articles to be expanded Articles needing translation from Latvian Wikipedia Articles needing translation from German Wikipedia Infobox mapframe without OSM relation ID on Wikidata Articles containing Latvian-language text Commons category link is on Wikidata Coordinates on Wikidata Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with LNB identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Pages using the Kartographer extension Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Languages Afrikaans Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ Català Čeština Deutsch Eesti Español فارسی Français 한국어 Ilokano Italiano עברית Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar مصرى Bahasa Melayu Nederlands Norsk bokmål Polski Português Română Русский Српски / srpski Suomi Svenska Українська Tiếng Việt 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 24 December 2020, at 12:22 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1789 ---- Persius - Wikipedia Persius From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Roman poet and satirist (AD 34-62) Not to be confused with Perseus. Persius Aulus Persius Flaccus (/ˈpɜːrʃiəs, ˈpɜːrʃəs/; 4 December 34 – 24 November 62) was a Roman poet and satirist of Etruscan origin. In his works, poems and satires, he shows a Stoic wisdom and a strong criticism for what he considered to be the stylistic abuses of his poetic contemporaries. His works, which became very popular in the Middle Ages, were published after his death by his friend and mentor, the Stoic philosopher Lucius Annaeus Cornutus. Contents 1 Life 1.1 Doubts over his biography 2 Work 2.1 Authorities 3 Editions 4 Notes 5 References 6 External links Life[edit] According to the Life contained in the manuscripts, Persius was born into an equestrian family at Volterra (Volaterrae, in Latin), a small Etruscan city in the province of Pisa, of good stock on both parents' side. When six years old he lost his father; his stepfather died a few years later. At the age of twelve Persius came to Rome, where he was taught by Remmius Palaemon and the rhetor Verginius Flavus. During the next four years he developed friendships with the Stoic Lucius Annaeus Cornutus, the lyric poet Caesius Bassus, and the poet Lucan.[1] Lucan would become a generous admirer of all Persius wrote. He also became close friends with Thrasea Paetus, the husband of Arria, a relative of Persius's; over the next ten years Persius and Thrasea Paetus shared many travels together. Later, he met Seneca, but was not impressed by his genius. In his boyhood, Persius wrote a tragedy dealing with an episode in Roman history, and another work, probably on travel (although this would have been before the travels with Thrasea Paetus). Reading the satires of Lucilius made Persius want to write like him, and he set to work on a book of his own satires. But he wrote seldom and slowly; a premature death (uitio stomachi) prevented him from completing the book. He has been described as having "a gentle disposition, girlish modesty and personal beauty", and is said to have lived a life of exemplary devotion towards his mother Fulvia Sisennia, his sister and his aunt. To his mother and sister he left his considerable fortune. Cornutus suppressed all his work except the satires, to which he made some slight alterations before handing it over to Bassus for editing. It proved an immediate success.[1] Doubts over his biography[edit] The scholia add a few details—on what authority is, as generally with such sources, very doubtful. The Life itself, though not free from the suspicion of interpolation and undoubtedly corrupt and disordered in places, is probably trustworthy. The manuscripts say it came from the commentary of Valerius Probus, no doubt a learned edition of Persius like those of Virgil and Horace by this same famous "grammarian" of Berytus, the poet's contemporary. The only case in which it seems to conflict with the Satires (Saturae) themselves is in its statement as to the death of Persius's father. The declaiming of a suasoria in his presence (Sat. 3.4 sqq.) implies a more mature age than that of six in the performer. But pater might here mean "stepfather," or Persius may have forgotten his own autobiography, may be simply reproducing one of his models. The mere fact that the Life and the Satires agree so closely does not of course prove the authenticity of the former. One of the points of harmony is, however, too subtle for us to believe that a forger evolved it from the works of Persius: the Life gives the impression of a "bookish" youth, who never strayed far from home and family. This is also the picture drawn by the Satires; many of the characters that Persius creates have the same names as characters found in Horace.[1] A keen observer of what occurs within his narrow horizon, Persius did not shy away from describing the seamy side of life (cf. e.g. such hints as Sat. iii.110), especially the relationship between excesses of consumption and moral failure; he shows little of Horace's easy-going acceptance of human weaknesses. Perhaps the sensitive, homebred nature of Persius can also be glimpsed in his frequent references to ridicule, whether of great men by street gamins or of the cultured by philistines.[1] Montaigne mentions Persius several times.[citation needed] Work[edit] The chief interest of Persius's work lies in its relation to Roman satire, in its interpretation of Roman Stoicism, and in its use of the Latin tongue. The influence of Horace on Persius can, in spite of the silence of the Life, hardly have been less than that of Lucilius. Not only characters, as noted above, but whole phrases, thoughts and situations come direct from him. The resemblance only emphasizes the difference between the caricaturist of Stoicism and its preacher. Persius strikes the highest note that Roman satire reached; in earnestness and moral purpose he rises far superior to the political rancour or good-natured persiflage of his predecessors and the rhetorical indignation of Juvenal. From him we learn how that philosophy could work on minds that still preserved the depth and purity of the old Roman gravitas. Some of the parallel passages in the works of Persius and Seneca are very close, and cannot be explained by assuming the use of a common source. Like Seneca, Persius censures the style of the day, and imitates it. Indeed, in some of its worst failings, straining of expression, excess of detail, exaggeration, he outbids Seneca, whilst the obscurity, which makes his little book of not seven hundred lines so difficult to read and is in no way due to great depth of thought, compares poorly with the terse clearness of the Epistolae morales. A curious contrast to this tendency is presented by his free use of "popular" words. As of Plato, so of Persius, we hear that he emulated Sophron; the authority is a late one (the Byzantine Lydus, De mag. I.41), but we can at least recognize in the scene that opens Sat. 3 kinship with such work as Theocritus' Adoniazusae and the Mimes of Herodas.[1] Persius's satires are composed in hexameters, except for the scazons of the short prologue above referred to. The first satire censures the literary tastes of the day as a reflection of the decadence of the national morals. The theme of Seneca's 114th letter is similar. The description of the recitator and the literary twaddlers after dinner is vividly natural, but an interesting passage which cites specimens of smooth versification and the languishing style is greatly spoiled by the difficulty of appreciating the points involved and indeed of distributing the dialogue (a not uncommon crux in Persius). The remaining satires handle in order (2) the question as to what we may justly ask of the gods (cf. Second Alcibiades), (3) the importance of having a definite aim in life, (4) the necessity of self-knowledge for public men (cf. Plato's First Alcibiades), (5) the Stoic doctrine of liberty (introduced by generous allusions to Cornutus' teaching), and (6) the proper use of money.[1] The Life tells us that the Satires were not left complete; some lines were taken (presumably by Cornutus or Bassus) from the end of the work so that it might be quasi finitus. This perhaps means that a sentence in which Persius had left a line imperfect, or a paragraph which he had not completed, had to be omitted. The same authority says that Cornutus definitely blacked out an offensive allusion to the emperor's literary taste, and that we owe to him the reading of the manuscripts in Sat. i.121,—"auriculas asini quis non (for Mida rex ) habet!" Traces of lack of revision are, however, still visible; cf. e.g. v.176 (sudden transition from ambition to superstition) and vi.37 (where criticism of Greek doctores has nothing to do with the context). The parallels to passages of Horace and Seneca are recorded in the commentaries: in view of what the Life says about Lucan, the verbal resemblance of Sat. iii.3 to Phars. x.163 is interesting. Examples of bold language or metaphor: i.25, rupto iecore exierit caprificus, 60, linguae quantum sitiat canis; iii.42, intus palleat, 81, silentia rodunt; v.92, ueteres auiae de pulmone reuello. Passages like iii.87, 100 sqq. show elaboration carried beyond the rules of good taste. "Popular" words: baro, cerdo, ebullire, glutto, lallare, mamma, muttire, obba, palpo, scloppus. Fine lines, etc., in i.116 sqq., ii.6 sqq., 61 sqq., 73 sqq., iii.39 sqq.[1] Authorities[edit] The manuscripts of Persius fall into two groups, one represented by two of the best of them, the other by that of Petrus Pithoeus, so important for the text of Juvenal. Since the publication of J. Bieger's de Persii cod. pith. recte aestimando (Berlin, 1890) the tendency has been to prefer the tradition of the latter.[1] The first important editions were: (1) with explanatory notes: Isaac Casaubon (Paris, 1605, enlarged edition by Johann Friedrich Dübner, Leipzig, 1833); Otto Jahn (with the scholia and valuable prolegomena, Leipzig, 1843); John Conington (with translation; 3rd ed., Oxford, 1893), etc.; but there are several modern editions.[1] Editions[edit] Braund, Susanna M. (2004) Juvenal and Persius. Loeb Classical Library. Harvard University Press. Notes[edit] ^ a b c d e f g h i  One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Persius". Encyclopædia Britannica. 21 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 254–255. References[edit] Bartsch, Shadi. Persius: A Study in Food, Philosophy, and the Figural. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015). Hooley, D. M. The Knotted Thong: Structures of Mimesis in Persius (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1997). Reckford, Kenneth J. Recognizing Persius (Princeton; Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2009) (Martin Classical Lectures). External links[edit] Media related to Aulus Persius Flaccus at Wikimedia Commons  Latin Wikisource has original text related to this article: Aulus Persius Flaccus  English Wikisource has original text related to this article: Aulus Persius Flaccus Quotations related to Persius at Wikiquote Works by Persius at Project Gutenberg Works by or about Persius at Internet Archive Online Galleries, History of Science Collections, University of Oklahoma Libraries High resolution images of works by Persius in .jpg and .tiff format. Auli Persii Flacci satirarum liber, cum scholiis antiquis, Otto Jahn (ed.), Lipsiae, typis et impensis Breitropfii er Baertelii, 1843. The Life of Aulus Persius Flaccus from Suetonius's De Viris Illustribus v t e Etruscan-related topics History Origins Villanovan culture Padanian Etruria Founding of Rome Tyrrhenus Tyrrhenians Tarchon Caelius Vibenna Capys Lucius Tarquinius Priscus Tanaquil Servius Tullius Lucius Tarquinius Superbus Aruns (son of Tarquinius Superbus) Lars Porsena Lars Tolumnius Titus Vestricius Spurinna Culture and society Apollo of Veii Architecture Art Chimera of Arezzo Coins Corpus Speculorum Etruscorum Etruscan League Etruscan names for Greek heroes Etruscan Sibyl Extispicy Fanum Voltumnae Haruspex Jewelry Lausus Liver of Piacenza Mezentius Mythological figures Mythology Persius Poppilia Raeti Religion Sarcophagus of the Spouses Tages Terracotta warriors Titus Lartius Tomb of the Roaring Lions Vulca Military history Battle of Alalia (540 BC–535 BC) Siege of Rome (509 BC) Siege of Rome (508 BC) Battle of the Cremera (477 BC) Battle of Cumae (474 BC) Battle of Fidenae (437 BC) Capture of Fidenae (435 BC) Battle of Veii (c. 396 BC) Battle of Lake Vadimo (310 BC) Battle of Populonia (282 BC) Language Alphabet Cippus Perusinus Corpus Inscriptionum Etruscarum Liber Linteus Pyrgi Tablets Raetic language Lemnian language Tabula Capuana Tabula Cortonensis Tyrsenian languages Spanish words of Etruscan origin English words of Etruscan origin Archeology Bucchero Cuniculi Etruscology Impasto (pottery) Monteleone Chariot National Etruscan Museum Negau helmet Portonaccio Tomb of Orcus Tumulus of Montefortini Vicus Tuscus Key sites Acquarossa Adria Aleria Baratti Bologna Caere Ceri Cerveteri Civita di Bagnoregio Clusium Cumae Etruria Falerii Fescennia Fidenae Norchia Orvieto Perusia Poggio Colla Populonia Pyrgi Rusellae San Giovenale Spina Tarquinia Tuscania Veii Vetulonia Vie Cave Volsinii Volterra Vulci Portal Authority control BIBSYS: 90071359 BNE: XX969799 BNF: cb119849259 (data) CANTIC: a11842854 CiNii: DA02981886 GND: 118592815 ICCU: IT\ICCU\CFIV\051353 ISNI: 0000 0001 2145 1431 LCCN: n79060980 NDL: 001112884 NKC: jn19990006470 NLA: 35696588 NLG: 94831 NSK: 000639129 NTA: 06781610X RERO: 02-A000129532 SELIBR: 247162 SUDOC: 027908518 VcBA: 495/16135 VIAF: 100198157 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n79060980 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Persius&oldid=993314619" Categories: 34 births 62 deaths 1st-century Romans Latin-language writers Roman-era poets Roman-era satirists Silver Age Latin writers Etruscans Hidden categories: Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica with Wikisource reference Wikipedia articles incorporating text from the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica Articles with short description Short description matches Wikidata Articles containing Latin-language text All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from April 2018 Commons category link from Wikidata Articles with Project Gutenberg links Articles with Internet Archive links Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CANTIC identifiers Wikipedia articles with CINII identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ICCU identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with NDL identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLG identifiers Wikipedia articles with NSK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with RERO identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica articles with no significant updates Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikiquote Wikisource Languages Asturianu Български Català Čeština Deutsch Español Esperanto Estremeñu Euskara فارسی Français Furlan Galego Íslenska Italiano עברית Latina Magyar Македонски Nederlands Norsk bokmål Polski Português Română Русский Sicilianu Slovenčina Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Türkçe Українська Edit links This page was last edited on 9 December 2020, at 23:54 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1804 ---- Virgil - Wikipedia Virgil From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search This article is about the ancient Roman poet. For the grammarian, see Virgilius Maro Grammaticus. For other uses, see Virgil (disambiguation). 1st-century BC Roman poet Virgil 19th-century imagining of Virgil Born Publius Vergilius Maro 15 October 70 BC Near Mantua, Cisalpine Gaul, Roman Republic Died 21 September 19 BC (age 50) Brundisium, Italy, Roman Empire Occupation Poet Nationality Roman Genre Epic poetry, didactic poetry, pastoral poetry Literary movement Augustan poetry Publius Vergilius Maro (Classical Latin: [ˈpuːbli.ʊs wɛrˈɡɪli.ʊs ˈmaroː]; traditional dates 15 October 70 BC – 21 September 19 BC),[1] usually called Virgil or Vergil (/ˈvɜːrdʒɪl/ VUR-jil) in English, was an ancient Roman poet of the Augustan period. He wrote three of the most famous poems in Latin literature: the Eclogues (or Bucolics), the Georgics, and the epic Aeneid. A number of minor poems, collected in the Appendix Vergiliana, are sometimes attributed to him as well.[2][3] Virgil is traditionally ranked as one of Rome's greatest poets. His Aeneid has been considered the national epic of ancient Rome since the time of its composition. Modeled after Homer's Iliad and Odyssey, the Aeneid follows the Trojan refugee Aeneas as he struggles to fulfill his destiny and reach Italy, where his descendants Romulus and Remus were to found the city of Rome. Virgil's work has had wide and deep influence on Western literature, most notably Dante's Divine Comedy, in which Virgil appears as the author's guide through Hell and Purgatory.[4] Contents 1 Life and works 1.1 Birth and biographical tradition 1.2 Early works 1.3 The Eclogues 1.4 The Georgics 1.5 The Aeneid 1.6 Reception of the Aeneid 1.7 Virgil's death and editing of the Aeneid 2 Later views and reception 2.1 In antiquity 2.2 Late antiquity, the Middle Ages, and after 2.3 Legends 2.4 Virgil's tomb 3 Spelling of name 4 See also 5 References 5.1 Notes 5.2 Citations 6 Further reading 7 External links Life and works[edit] Birth and biographical tradition[edit] Virgil's biographical tradition is thought to depend on a lost biography by Varius, Virgil's editor, which was incorporated into the biography by Suetonius and the commentaries of Servius and Donatus, the two great commentators on Virgil's poetry. Although the commentaries no doubt record much factual information about Virgil, some of their evidence can be shown to rely on inferences made from his poetry and allegorizing; thus, Virgil's biographical tradition remains problematic.[5]:1602 The tradition holds that Virgil was born in the village of Andes, near Mantua[i] in Cisalpine Gaul (northern Italy, added to Italy proper during his lifetime).[6] Analysis of his name has led some to believe that he descended from earlier Roman colonists. Modern speculation, however, ultimately is not supported by narrative evidence either from his own writings or his later biographers. Macrobius says that Virgil's father was of a humble background, though scholars generally believe that Virgil was from an equestrian landowning family who could afford to give him an education. He attended schools in Cremona, Mediolanum, Rome and Naples. After considering briefly a career in rhetoric and law, the young Virgil turned his talents to poetry.[7] According to Robert Seymour Conway, the only ancient source which reports the actual distance between Andes and Mantua is a surviving fragment from the works of Marcus Valerius Probus. Probus flourished during the reign of Nero (AD 54–68).[8] Probus reports that Andes was located 30 Roman miles from Mantua. Conway translated this to a distance of about 45 kilometres or 28 miles.[8] Relatively little is known about the family of Virgil. His father reportedly belonged to gens Vergilia, and his mother belonged to gens Magia.[8] According to Conway, gens Vergilia is poorly attested in inscriptions from the entire Northern Italy, where Mantua is located. Among thousands of surviving ancient inscriptions from this region, there are only 8 or 9 mentions of individuals called "Vergilius" (masculine) or "Vergilia" (feminine). Out of these mentions, three appear in inscriptions from Verona, and one in an inscription from Calvisano.[8] Conway theorized that the inscription from Calvisano had to do with a kinswoman of Virgil. Calvisano is located 30 Roman miles from Mantua, and would fit with Probus' description of Andes.[8] The inscription, in this case, is a votive offering to the Matronae (a group of deities) by a woman called Vergilia, asking the goddesses to deliver from danger another woman, called Munatia. Conway notes that the offering belongs to a common type for this era, where women made requests for deities to preserve the lives of female loved ones who were pregnant and were about to give birth. In most cases, the woman making the request was the mother of a woman who was pregnant or otherwise in danger. Though there is another inscription from Calvisano, where a woman asks the deities to preserve the life of her sister.[8] Munatia, the woman who Vergilia wished to protect, was likely a close relative of Vergilia, possibly her daughter. The name "Munatia" indicates that this woman was a member of gens Munatia, and makes it likely that Vergilia married into this family.[8] Other studies[9] claim that today's consideration for ancient Andes should be sought in the area of Castel Goffredo.[10] Early works[edit] Main article: Appendix Vergiliana According to the commentators, Virgil received his first education when he was five years old and he later went to Cremona, Milan, and finally Rome to study rhetoric, medicine, and astronomy, which he soon abandoned for philosophy. From Virgil's admiring references to the neoteric writers Pollio and Cinna, it has been inferred that he was, for a time, associated with Catullus' neoteric circle. According to Servius, schoolmates considered Virgil extremely shy and reserved, and he was nicknamed "Parthenias" or "maiden" because of his social aloofness. Virgil also seems to have suffered bad health throughout his life and in some ways lived the life of an invalid. According to the Catalepton, he began to write poetry while in the Epicurean school of Siro in Naples. A group of small works attributed to the youthful Virgil by the commentators survive collected under the title Appendix Vergiliana, but are largely considered spurious by scholars. One, the Catalepton, consists of fourteen short poems,[5]:1602 some of which may be Virgil's, and another, a short narrative poem titled the Culex ("The Gnat"), was attributed to Virgil as early as the 1st century AD. The Eclogues[edit] Main article: Eclogues Page from the beginning of the Eclogues in the 5th-century Vergilius Romanus The biographical tradition asserts that Virgil began the hexameter Eclogues (or Bucolics) in 42 BC and it is thought that the collection was published around 39–38 BC, although this is controversial.[5]:1602 The Eclogues (from the Greek for "selections") are a group of ten poems roughly modeled on the bucolic hexameter poetry ("pastoral poetry") of the Hellenistic poet Theocritus. After defeating the army led by the assassins of Julius Caesar in the Battle of Philippi (42 BC), Octavian tried to pay off his veterans with land expropriated from towns in northern Italy, which—according to tradition—included an estate near Mantua belonging to Virgil. The loss of Virgil's family farm and the attempt through poetic petitions to regain his property have traditionally been seen as his motives in the composition of the Eclogues. This is now thought to be an unsupported inference from interpretations of the Eclogues. In Eclogues 1 and 9, Virgil indeed dramatizes the contrasting feelings caused by the brutality of the land expropriations through pastoral idiom but offers no indisputable evidence of the supposed biographic incident. While some readers have identified the poet himself with various characters and their vicissitudes, whether gratitude by an old rustic to a new god (Ecl. 1), frustrated love by a rustic singer for a distant boy (his master's pet, Ecl. 2), or a master singer's claim to have composed several eclogues (Ecl. 5), modern scholars largely reject such efforts to garner biographical details from works of fiction, preferring to interpret an author's characters and themes as illustrations of contemporary life and thought. The ten Eclogues present traditional pastoral themes with a fresh perspective. Eclogues 1 and 9 address the land confiscations and their effects on the Italian countryside. 2 and 3 are pastoral and erotic, discussing both homosexual love (Ecl. 2) and attraction toward people of any gender (Ecl. 3). Eclogue 4, addressed to Asinius Pollio, the so-called "Messianic Eclogue", uses the imagery of the golden age in connection with the birth of a child (who the child was meant to be has been subject to debate). 5 and 8 describe the myth of Daphnis in a song contest, 6, the cosmic and mythological song of Silenus; 7, a heated poetic contest, and 10 the sufferings of the contemporary elegiac poet Cornelius Gallus. Virgil is credited[by whom?] in the Eclogues with establishing Arcadia as a poetic ideal that still resonates in Western literature and visual arts, and setting the stage for the development of Latin pastoral by Calpurnius Siculus, Nemesianus and later writers. The Georgics[edit] Main article: Georgics Sometime after the publication of the Eclogues (probably before 37 BC),[5]:1603 Virgil became part of the circle of Maecenas, Octavian's capable agent d'affaires who sought to counter sympathy for Antony among the leading families by rallying Roman literary figures to Octavian's side. Virgil came to know many of the other leading literary figures of the time, including Horace, in whose poetry he is often mentioned,[11] and Varius Rufus, who later helped finish the Aeneid. Late 17th-century illustration of a passage from the Georgics by Jerzy Siemiginowski-Eleuter At Maecenas' insistence (according to the tradition) Virgil spent the ensuing years (perhaps 37–29 BC) on the long didactic hexameter poem called the Georgics (from Greek, "On Working the Earth") which he dedicated to Maecenas. The ostensible theme of the Georgics is instruction in the methods of running a farm. In handling this theme, Virgil follows in the didactic ("how to") tradition of the Greek poet Hesiod's Works and Days and several works of the later Hellenistic poets. The four books of the Georgics focus respectively on raising crops and trees (1 and 2), livestock and horses (3), and beekeeping and the qualities of bees (4). Well-known passages include the beloved Laus Italiae of Book 2, the prologue description of the temple in Book 3, and the description of the plague at the end of Book 3. Book 4 concludes with a long mythological narrative, in the form of an epyllion which describes vividly the discovery of beekeeping by Aristaeus and the story of Orpheus' journey to the underworld. Ancient scholars, such as Servius, conjectured that the Aristaeus episode replaced, at the emperor's request, a long section in praise of Virgil's friend, the poet Gallus, who was disgraced by Augustus, and who committed suicide in 26 BC. The Georgics' tone wavers between optimism and pessimism, sparking critical debate on the poet's intentions,[5]:1605 but the work lays the foundations for later didactic poetry. Virgil and Maecenas are said to have taken turns reading the Georgics to Octavian upon his return from defeating Antony and Cleopatra at the Battle of Actium in 31 BC. The Aeneid[edit] Main article: Aeneid A 1st-century terracotta expressing the pietas of Aeneas, who carries his aged father and leads his young son The Aeneid is widely considered Virgil's finest work and one of the most important poems in the history of Western literature (T. S. Eliot referred to it as 'the classic of all Europe').[12] Virgil worked on the Aeneid during the last eleven years of his life (29–19 BC), commissioned, according to Propertius, by Augustus.[13] The epic poem consists of 12 books in dactylic hexameter verse which describe the journey of Aeneas, a warrior fleeing the sack of Troy, to Italy, his battle with the Italian prince Turnus, and the foundation of a city from which Rome would emerge. The Aeneid's first six books describe the journey of Aeneas from Troy to Rome. Virgil made use of several models in the composition of his epic;[5]:1603 Homer, the preeminent author of classical epic, is everywhere present, but Virgil also makes special use of the Latin poet Ennius and the Hellenistic poet Apollonius of Rhodes among the various other writers to which he alludes. Although the Aeneid casts itself firmly into the epic mode, it often seeks to expand the genre by including elements of other genres such as tragedy and aetiological poetry. Ancient commentators noted that Virgil seems to divide the Aeneid into two sections based on the poetry of Homer; the first six books were viewed as employing the Odyssey as a model while the last six were connected to the Iliad.[14] Book 1[ii] (at the head of the Odyssean section) opens with a storm which Juno, Aeneas' enemy throughout the poem, stirs up against the fleet. The storm drives the hero to the coast of Carthage, which historically was Rome's deadliest foe. The queen, Dido, welcomes the ancestor of the Romans, and under the influence of the gods falls deeply in love with him. At a banquet in Book 2, Aeneas tells the story of the sack of Troy, the death of his wife, and his escape, to the enthralled Carthaginians, while in Book 3 he recounts to them his wanderings over the Mediterranean in search of a suitable new home. Jupiter in Book 4 recalls the lingering Aeneas to his duty to found a new city, and he slips away from Carthage, leaving Dido to commit suicide, cursing Aeneas and calling down revenge in symbolic anticipation of the fierce wars between Carthage and Rome. In Book 5, funeral games are celebrated for Aeneas' father Anchises, who had died a year before. On reaching Cumae, in Italy in Book 6, Aeneas consults the Cumaean Sibyl, who conducts him through the Underworld where Aeneas meets the dead Anchises who reveals Rome's destiny to his son. Book 7 (beginning the Iliadic half) opens with an address to the muse and recounts Aeneas' arrival in Italy and betrothal to Lavinia, daughter of King Latinus. Lavinia had already been promised to Turnus, the king of the Rutulians, who is roused to war by the Fury Allecto, and Amata Lavinia's mother. In Book 8, Aeneas allies with King Evander, who occupies the future site of Rome, and is given new armor and a shield depicting Roman history. Book 9 records an assault by Nisus and Euryalus on the Rutulians, Book 10, the death of Evander's young son Pallas, and 11 the death of the Volscian warrior princess Camilla and the decision to settle the war with a duel between Aeneas and Turnus. The Aeneid ends in Book 12 with the taking of Latinus' city, the death of Amata, and Aeneas' defeat and killing of Turnus, whose pleas for mercy are spurned. The final book ends with the image of Turnus' soul lamenting as it flees to the underworld. Reception of the Aeneid[edit] Virgil Reading the Aeneid to Augustus, Octavia, and Livia by Jean-Baptiste Wicar, Art Institute of Chicago Critics of the Aeneid focus on a variety of issues.[iii] The tone of the poem as a whole is a particular matter of debate; some see the poem as ultimately pessimistic and politically subversive to the Augustan regime, while others view it as a celebration of the new imperial dynasty. Virgil makes use of the symbolism of the Augustan regime, and some scholars see strong associations between Augustus and Aeneas, the one as founder and the other as re-founder of Rome. A strong teleology, or drive towards a climax, has been detected in the poem. The Aeneid is full of prophecies about the future of Rome, the deeds of Augustus, his ancestors, and famous Romans, and the Carthaginian Wars; the shield of Aeneas even depicts Augustus' victory at Actium against Mark Antony and Cleopatra VII in 31 BC. A further focus of study is the character of Aeneas. As the protagonist of the poem, Aeneas seems to waver constantly between his emotions and commitment to his prophetic duty to found Rome; critics note the breakdown of Aeneas' emotional control in the last sections of the poem where the "pious" and "righteous" Aeneas mercilessly slaughters Turnus. The Aeneid appears to have been a great success. Virgil is said to have recited Books 2, 4, and 6 to Augustus;[5]:1603 and Book 6 apparently caused Augustus' sister Octavia to faint. Although the truth of this claim is subject to scholarly skepticism, it has served as a basis for later art, such as Jean-Baptiste Wicar's Virgil Reading the Aeneid. Unfortunately, some lines of the poem were left unfinished, and the whole was unedited, at Virgil's death in 19 BC. Virgil's death and editing of the Aeneid[edit] According to the tradition, Virgil traveled to Greece in about 19 BC to revise the Aeneid. After meeting Augustus in Athens and deciding to return home, Virgil caught a fever while visiting a town near Megara. After crossing to Italy by ship, weakened with disease, Virgil died in Brundisium harbor on 21 September 19 BC. Augustus ordered Virgil's literary executors, Lucius Varius Rufus and Plotius Tucca, to disregard Virgil's own wish that the poem be burned, instead of ordering it published with as few editorial changes as possible.[15] As a result, the text of the Aeneid that exists may contain faults which Virgil was planning to correct before publication. However, the only obvious imperfections are a few lines of verse that are metrically unfinished (i.e. not a complete line of dactylic hexameter). Some scholars have argued that Virgil deliberately left these metrically incomplete lines for dramatic effect.[16] Other alleged imperfections are subject to scholarly debate. Later views and reception[edit] A 3rd-century Roman mosaic of Virgil seated between Clio and Melpomene (from Hadrumetum [Sousse], Tunisia) A 5th-century portrait of Virgil from the Vergilius Romanus Virgil in His Basket, Lucas van Leyden, 1525 In antiquity[edit] The works of Virgil almost from the moment of their publication revolutionized Latin poetry. The Eclogues, Georgics, and above all the Aeneid became standard texts in school curricula with which all educated Romans were familiar. Poets following Virgil often refer intertextually to his works to generate meaning in their own poetry. The Augustan poet Ovid parodies the opening lines of the Aeneid in Amores 1.1.1–2, and his summary of the Aeneas story in Book 14 of the Metamorphoses, the so-called "mini-Aeneid", has been viewed as a particularly important example of post-Virgilian response to the epic genre. Lucan's epic, the Bellum Civile, has been considered an anti-Virgilian epic, disposing of the divine mechanism, treating historical events, and diverging drastically from Virgilian epic practice. The Flavian poet Statius in his 12-book epic Thebaid engages closely with the poetry of Virgil; in his epilogue he advises his poem not to "rival the divine Aeneid, but follow afar and ever venerate its footsteps."[17] In Silius Italicus, Virgil finds one of his most ardent admirers. With almost every line of his epic Punica, Silius references Virgil. Indeed, Silius is known to have bought Virgil's tomb and worshipped the poet.[18] Partially as a result of his so-called "Messianic" Fourth Eclogue – widely interpreted later to have predicted the birth of Jesus Christ – Virgil was in later antiquity imputed to have the magical abilities of a seer; the Sortes Vergilianae, the process of using Virgil's poetry as a tool of divination, is found in the time of Hadrian, and continued into the Middle Ages. In a similar vein Macrobius in the Saturnalia credits the work of Virgil as the embodiment of human knowledge and experience, mirroring the Greek conception of Homer.[5]:1603 Virgil also found commentators in antiquity. Servius, a commentator of the 4th century AD, based his work on the commentary of Donatus. Servius' commentary provides us with a great deal of information about Virgil's life, sources, and references; however, many modern scholars find the variable quality of his work and the often simplistic interpretations frustrating. Late antiquity, the Middle Ages, and after[edit] The verse inscription at Virgil's tomb was supposedly composed by the poet himself: Mantua me genuit, Calabri rapuere, tenet nunc Parthenope. Cecini pascua, rura, duces. ("Mantua gave me life, the Calabrians took it away, Naples holds me now; I sang of pastures, farms, and commanders" [transl. Bernard Knox]) Even as the Western Roman Empire collapsed, literate men acknowledged that Virgil was a master poet – Saint Augustine, for example, confessing how he had wept at reading the death of Dido.[19] Gregory of Tours read Virgil, whom he quotes in several places, along with some other Latin poets, though he cautions that "we ought not to relate their lying fables, lest we fall under sentence of eternal death".[20] In the Renaissance of the 12th century, Alexander Neckham placed the "divine" Aeneid on his standard arts curriculum,[21] and Dido became the romantic heroine of the age.[22] Monks like Maiolus of Cluny might repudiate what they called "the luxurious eloquence of Virgil",[23] but they could not deny the power of his appeal. Dante made Virgil his guide in Hell and the greater part of Purgatory in the Divine Comedy.[24] Dante also mentions Virgil in De vulgari eloquentia, along with Ovid, Lucan and Statius, as one of the four regulati poetae (ii, vi, 7). The Renaissance saw a number of authors inspired to write epic in Virgil's wake: Edmund Spenser called himself the English Virgil; Paradise Lost was calqued on the Aeneid; and later artists influenced by Virgil include Berlioz and Hermann Broch.[25] The best-known surviving manuscripts of Virgil's works include the Vergilius Augusteus, the Vergilius Vaticanus and the Vergilius Romanus. Legends[edit] The legend of "Virgil in his basket" arose in the Middle Ages, and is often seen in art and mentioned in literature as part of the Power of Women literary topos, demonstrating the disruptive force of female attractiveness on men. In this story Virgil became enamoured of a beautiful woman, sometimes described as the emperor's daughter or mistress and called Lucretia. She played him along and agreed to an assignation at her house, which he was to sneak into at night by climbing into a large basket let down from a window. When he did so he was hoisted only halfway up the wall and then left trapped there into the next day, exposed to public ridicule. The story paralleled that of Phyllis riding Aristotle. Among other artists depicting the scene, Lucas van Leyden made a woodcut and later an engraving.[26] In the Middle Ages, Virgil's reputation was such that it inspired legends associating him with magic and prophecy. From at least the 3rd century, Christian thinkers interpreted Eclogues 4, which describes the birth of a boy ushering in a golden age, as a prediction of Jesus' birth. In consequence, Virgil came to be seen on a similar level to the Hebrew prophets of the Bible as one who had heralded Christianity.[27] Relatedly, The Jewish Encyclopedia argues that medieval legends about the golem may have been inspired by Virgilian legends about the poet's apocryphal power to bring inanimate objects to life.[28] Possibly as early as the second century AD, Virgil's works were seen as having magical properties and were used for divination. In what became known as the Sortes Vergilianae ('Virgilian Lots'), passages would be selected at random and interpreted to answer questions.[29] In the 12th century, starting around Naples but eventually spreading widely throughout Europe, a tradition developed in which Virgil was regarded as a great magician. Legends about Virgil and his magical powers remained popular for over two hundred years, arguably becoming as prominent as his writings themselves.[29] Virgil's legacy in medieval Wales was such that the Welsh version of his name, Fferyllt or Pheryllt, became a generic term for magic-worker, and survives in the modern Welsh word for pharmacist, fferyllydd.[30] Virgil's tomb[edit] The structure known as "Virgil's tomb" is found at the entrance of an ancient Roman tunnel (aka "grotta vecchia") in Piedigrotta, a district 3 kilometres (1.9 mi) from the centre of Naples, near the Mergellina harbor, on the road heading north along the coast to Pozzuoli. While Virgil was already the object of literary admiration and veneration before his death, in the Middle Ages his name became associated with miraculous powers, and for a couple of centuries his tomb was the destination of pilgrimages and veneration.[31] Tomb of Virgil in Naples, Italy Spelling of name[edit] By the fourth or fifth century AD the original spelling Vergilius had been corrupted to Virgilius, and then the latter spelling spread to the modern European languages.[32] The error persisted even though, as early as the 15th century, the classical scholar Poliziano had shown Vergilius to be the original spelling.[33] Today, the anglicizations Vergil and Virgil are both acceptable.[34] There is some speculation that the spelling Virgilius might have arisen due to a pun, since virg- carries an echo of the Latin word for 'wand' (uirga), Vergil being particularly associated with magic in the Middle Ages. There is also a possibility that virg- is meant to evoke the Latin uirgo ('virgin'); this would be a reference to the fourth Eclogue, which has a history of Christian, and specifically Messianic, interpretations.[iv] See also[edit] Quintus Caecilius Epirota References[edit] Notes[edit] ^ The epitaph on his tomb in Posilipo near Naples read Mantua me genuit; Calabri rapuere; tenet nunc Parthenope. Cecini pascua, rura, duces ("Mantua gave birth to me, the Calabrians took me, now Naples holds me; I sang of pastures [the Eclogues], country [the Georgics] and leaders [the Aeneid]"). ^ For a succinct summary, see Globalnet.co.uk Archived 18 December 2009 at the Wayback Machine ^ For a bibliography and summary see Fowler, pp. 1605–1606 ^ For more discussion on the spelling of Virgil's name, see Flickinger, R. C. 1930. "Vergil or Virgil?." The Classical Journal 25(9):658–60. Citations[edit] ^ Jones, Peter (2011). Reading Virgil: Aeneid I and II. Cambridge University Press. pp. 1, 4. ISBN 978-0521768665. Retrieved 23 November 2016. ^ Bunson, Matthew (2014). Encyclopedia of the Roman Empire. Infobase Publishing. p. 584. ISBN 978-1438110271. Retrieved 23 November 2016. ^ Roberts, John (2007). The Oxford Dictionary of the Classical World. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0192801463. Retrieved 23 November 2016. ^ Ruud, Jay (2008). Critical Companion to Dante. Infobase Publishing. p. 376. ISBN 978-1438108414. Retrieved 23 November 2016. ^ a b c d e f g h Fowler, Don. 1996. "Virgil (Publius Vergilius Maro)." In The Oxford Classical Dictionary (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ^ "Map of Cisalpine Gaul". gottwein.de. Archived from the original on 28 May 2008. ^ Damen, Mark. [2002] 2004. "Vergil and 'The Aeneid'." Ch. 11 in A Guide to Writing in History and Classics. Utah State University. Archived from the original on 16 February 2017. Retrieved 28 May 2020. ^ a b c d e f g Conway, Robert Seymour. 1967. "Where Was Vergil's Farm." Harvard Lectures on the Vergilian Age. Biblo & Tannen. ISBN 978-0819601827. pp. 14–41. The article was originally sourced from Nupedia and is open content. ^ Nardoni, Davide (1986). "La terra di Virgilio". Archeologia Viva (in Italian) (january-february ed.). pp. 71–76. ^ Gualtierotti, Piero (2008). Castel Goffredo dalle origini ai Gonzaga (in Italian). Mantua. p. 96-100. ^ Horace, Satires 1.5, 1.6; Horace, Odes 1.3 ^ Eliot, T. S. 1944. What Is a Classic?. London: Faber & Faber. ^ Avery, W. T. (1957). "Augustus and the "Aeneid"". The Classical Journal. 52 (5): 225–29. ^ Jenkyns, p. 53 ^ Sellar, William Young, Terrot R. Glover, and Margaret Bryant. 1911. "Virgil." Pp. 111–16 in Encyclopædia Britannica 28 (11th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved 27 May 2020. p. 112. ^ Miller, F. J. 1909. "Evidences of Incompleteness in the "Aeneid" of Vergil." The Classical Journal 4(11):341–55. JSTOR 3287376. ^ Theb.12.816–817 ^ Pliny Ep. 3.7.8 ^ K. W. Gransden, Virgil: The Aeneid (Cambridge 1990), p. 105. ^ Gregory of Tours 1916, p. xiii. sfn error: no target: CITEREFGregory_of_Tours1916 (help) ^ Helen Waddell, The Wandering Scholars (Fontana 1968), p. 19. ^ Waddell, pp. 22–3. ^ Waddell, p. 101. ^ Alighieri, Dante (2003). The Divine Comedy (The Inferno, The Purgatorio, and The Paradiso). New York: Berkley. ISBN 978-0451208637. ^ Gransden, pp. 108–111. ^ Snyder, James. 1985. Northern Renaissance Art. US: Harry N. Abrams, ISBN 0136235964. pp. 461–62. ^ Ziolkowski, Jan M.; Putnam, Michael C. J. (2008). The Virgilian Tradition: The First Fifteen Hundred Years. Yale University Press. pp. xxxiv–xxxv. ISBN 978-0300108224. Retrieved 11 November 2013. ^  Singer, Isidore; et al., eds. (1901–1906). "Golem". The Jewish Encyclopedia. New York: Funk & Wagnalls. ^ a b Ziolkowski, Jan M.; Putnam, Michael C. J. (2008). The Virgilian Tradition: The First Fifteen Hundred Years. Yale University Press. p. xxxiv. ISBN 978-0300108224. Retrieved 11 November 2013. ^ Ziolkowski, Jan M.; Putnam, Michael C. J. (2008). The Virgilian Tradition: The First Fifteen Hundred Years. Yale University Press. pp. 101–102. ISBN 978-0300108224. Retrieved 11 November 2013. ^ Chambers, Robert (1832). The Book of Days. London: W and R Chambers. p. 366. ^ Comparetti, Domenico (1997). Vergil in the Middle Ages. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0691026787. Retrieved 23 November 2016. ^ Wilson-Okamura, David Scott (2010). Virgil in the Renaissance. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521198127. Retrieved 23 November 2016. ^ Winkler, Anthony C.; McCuen-Metherell, Jo Ray (2011). Writing the Research Paper: A Handbook. Cengage Learning. p. 278. ISBN 978-1133169024. Retrieved 23 November 2016. Further reading[edit] Anderson, W. S., and L. N. Quartarone. 2002. Approaches to Teaching Vergil's Aeneid. New York: Modern Language Association. Buckham, Philip Wentworth, Joseph Spence, Edward Holdsworth, William Warburton, and John Jortin. 1825. Miscellanea Virgiliana: In Scriptis Maxime Eruditorum Virorum Varie Dispersa, in Unum Fasciculum Collecta. Cambridge: Printed for W. P. Grant. Conway, R. S. [1914] 1915. "The Youth of Vergil." Bulletin of the John Rylands Library July 1915. Farrell, J. 1991. Vergil's Georgics and the Traditions of Ancient Epic: The Art of Allusion in Literary History. New York: Oxford University Press. — 2001. "The Vergilian Century." Vergilius (1959-) 47:11–28. JSTOR 41587251. Farrell, J., and Michael C. J. Putnam, eds. 2010. A Companion to Vergil's Aeneid and Its Tradition, (Blackwell Companions to the Ancient World). Chichester, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Fletcher, K. F. B. 2014. Finding Italy: Travel, Nation and Colonization in Vergil's 'Aeneid'. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Gregory of Tours. 1916. The History of the Franks, translated by E. Brehaut. New York: Columbia University Press. OCLC 560532077. Hardie, Philip R., ed. 1999. Virgil: Critical Assessments of Ancient Authors 1–4. New York: Routledge. Henkel, John. 2014. "Vergil Talks Technique: Metapoetic Arboriculture in 'Georgics' 2." Vergilius (1959–) 60:33–66. JSTOR 43185985. Horsfall, N. 2016. The Epic Distilled: Studies in the Composition of the Aeneid. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Mack, S. 1978. Patterns of Time in Vergil. Hamden: Archon Books. Panoussi, V. 2009. Greek Tragedy in Vergil's "Aeneid": Ritual, Empire, and Intertext. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Quinn, S., ed. 2000. Why Vergil? A Collection of Interpretations. Wauconda: Bolchazy-Carducci. Rossi, A. 2004. Contexts of War: Manipulation of Genre in Virgilian Battle Narrative. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Sondrup, Steven P. 2009. "Virgil: From Farms to Empire: Kierkegaard's Understanding of a Roman Poet." In Kierkegaard and the Roman World, edited by J. B. Stewart. Farnham: Ashgate. Syed, Y. 2005. Vergil's Aeneid and the Roman Self: Subject and Nation in Literary Discourse. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Syson, A. 2013. Fama and Fiction in Vergil's 'Aeneid'. Columbus: Ohio State University Press. External links[edit] Virgilat Wikipedia's sister projects Definitions from Wiktionary Media from Wikimedia Commons News from Wikinews Quotations from Wikiquote Texts from Wikisource Resources from Wikiversity Library resources about Virgil Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries By Virgil Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries Collected works Works by Virgil at Project Gutenberg Works by or about Virgil at Internet Archive Works by Virgil at LibriVox (public domain audiobooks) Works of Virgil at the Perseus Digital Library — Latin texts, translations, and commentaries Aeneid, Eclogues, and Georgics translated by J. C. Greenough, 1900 Aeneid, translated by T. C. Williams, 1910 — translated by John Dryden, 1697 Works of Virgil at Theoi Project Aeneid, Eclogues and Georgics, translated by H. R. Fairclough, 1916 Works of Virgil at Internet Sacred Texts Archive Aeneid, translated by John Dryden, 1697 Eclogues and Georgics, translated by J. W. MacKail, 1934 P. Vergilius Maro at The Latin Library Virgil's works — text, concordances, and frequency list. Virgil: The Major Texts: contemporary, line-by-line English translations of Eclogues, Georgics, and Aeneid. Virgil in the collection of Ferdinand, Duke of Calabria at Somni: Publii Vergilii Maronis Opera Naples and Milan, 1450. Publii Vergilii Maronis Opera Italy, 1470 – 1499. Publii Vergilii Maronis Opera Milan, 1465. Lewis E 198 Opera at OPenn Biography Virgil at the Encyclopædia Britannica Suetonius: The Life of Virgil — an English translation. Vita Vergiliana [The Life of Virgil] by Aelius Donatus (in original Latin). Aelius Donatus' Life of Virgil, translated by David Wilson-Okamura Vergil – A Biography (Project Gutenberg ed.), by Tenney Frank. Vergilian Chronology (in German). Commentary The Vergil Project. "A new Aeneid for the 21st century." — A review of Robert Fagles's new translation of the Aeneid in the TLS, 9 February 2007. Virgilmurder — Jean-Yves Maleuvre's website setting forth his theory that Virgil was murdered by Augustus. The Secret History of Virgil — contains selection on the magical legends and tall tales that circulated about Virgil in the Middle Ages. Interview with Virgil scholar Richard Thomas and poet David Ferry, who recently translated the "Georgics" — via ThoughtCast SORGLL: Aeneid, Bk I, 1–49, read by Robert Sonkowsky SORGLL: Aeneid, Bk IV, 296–396, read by Stephen Daitz Bibliographies Comprehensive bibliographies on all three of Virgil's major works, downloadable in Word or pdf format Bibliography of works relating Vergil to the literature of the Hellenistic age A selective Bibliographical Guide to Vergil's Aeneid Virgil in Late Antiquity, the Middle Ages, and the Renaissance: an Online Bibliography v t e Virgil Works Eclogues (Eclogue 4) Georgics Aeneid Appendix Vergiliana (spurious) Manuscripts Vergilius Augusteus Vergilius Romanus Vergilius Vaticanus Miscellaneous Christian interpretations of Eclogue 4 Sortes Vergilianae The Virgilian Progression Virgil's tomb Commons Wikiquote Wikisource texts v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films Associated subjects v t e Virgil's Aeneid (19 BC) Characters Deities Alecto Crinisus Cupid Hecate Hymen Juno Jupiter Mars Mercury Saturn Tiberinus Venus Humans Acestes Achaemenides Achates Actor Aeneads Aeneas Aeolus Ajax the Lesser Aletes Amata Anchises Androgeos Andromache Anna Perenna Antiphates Ascanius Automedon Aventinus Butes Caieta Camilla Capys Cassandra Catillus Clonius Clytius Creusa Cydon Cydonians Dardanus Dares Phrygius Deiphobus Diomedes Elymus Entellus Erulus Euryalus Evander of Pallene Halaesus Halys Helenus Hippocoon Iarbas Ilioneus Juturna Laocoön Latinus Lausus Lavinia Macar Messapus Metabus Mezentius Mimas Misenus Mnestheus Neoptolemus Nisus and Euryalus Ornytus Palinurus Pallas Pandarus Panthous Paris Picus Polites Priam Ripheus Rutuli Salius Sinon Theano Thymoetes Turnus Ucalegon Ufens Phoenicians Acerbas Belus II Dido Mattan I Pygmalion of Tyre Film and TV The Avenger (1962) Eneide (1971–2) Eneyida (1991) Literature Roman d'Enéas (1160 poem) Dido, Queen of Carthage (c. 1593 play) Amelia (1751 novel) The Dunciad (1729 poem) Lavinia (2008 novel) Opera Didone (1641 Cavalli) Achille et Polyxène (1687 Lully/Collasse) Dido and Aeneas (1688 Purcell) Didon (1693 Desmarets) Didone abbandonata (1724 libretto Metastasio) Didone abbandonata (1724 Sarro) Didone abbandonata (1724 Albinoni) Didone abbandonata (1726 Vinci) Didone abbandonata (1762 Sarti) Didon (1783 Piccinni) Dido, Queen of Carthage (1792 Storace) Les Troyens (1858 Berlioz) Manuscripts Book of Ballymote Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 31 Vergilius Augusteus Vergilius Romanus Vergilius Vaticanus Phrases Ad astra Annuit cœptis Experto crede Lacrimae rerum Obscuris vera involvens Quos ego Timeo Danaos et dona ferentes Art Laocoön and His Sons (25 BC) Aeneas, Anchises, and Ascanius (1619) The Dream of Aeneas (1660–65) Ascanius Shooting the Stag of Sylvia (1689) Dido building Carthage (1815) The Golden Bough (1834) Music "And Then There Was Silence" Gates of Fire Study Aposiopesis Dactylic hexameter Hysteron proteron Sortes Vergilianae Related Trojan Horse The Golden Bough Eneados Sulpicius Apollinaris "Fortune favours the bold" "Mind over matter" Parallels between Virgil's Aeneid and Homer's Iliad and Odyssey Political commentary of the Aeneid v t e "Dido and Aeneas" from Virgil's Aeneid Characters Dido Aeneas Operas Didone (1641, Cavalli) Dido and Aeneas (1688, Purcell) discography "Dido's Lament" Didon (1693, Desmarets) Didone abbandonata (1724, Metastasio) Didone abbandonata (1724, Sarro) Didone abbandonata (1724, Albinoni) Didone abbandonata (1762, Sarti) Didon (1783, Piccinni) Dido, Queen of Carthage (1792, Storace) Les Troyens (1863, Berlioz) Plays Dido, Queen of Carthage (c. 1593) Poetry Roman d'Enéas (1160) Music Simple Man Art Dido building Carthage Related Low Ham Roman Villa Amelia Authority control BIBSYS: 90056752 BNC: 000035929 BNE: XX874783 BNF: cb11887823w (data) BPN: 49151168 CANTIC: a10176597 CiNii: DA01154972 GND: 118626574 ICCU: IT\ICCU\CFIV\008978 ISNI: 0000 0001 2119 8069 LCCN: n79014062 LNB: 000013016 MBA: 0109a674-73aa-41a0-b52f-512eb878a6dd NDL: 00459674 NKC: jn19981002320 NLA: 35579909 NLG: 194480 NLI: 000138175 NLK: KAC199628865 NLP: A11799808 NSK: 000025569 NTA: 068890133 RERO: 02-A000172072 RSL: 000080997 SELIBR: 200505 SNAC: w6tr8912 SUDOC: 026674327 Trove: 1002542 ULAN: 500337098 VcBA: 495/15609 VIAF: 8194433 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n79014062 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Virgil&oldid=996653700" Categories: Virgil People from Mantua Golden Age Latin writers Latin-language writers Ancient Roman writers Roman-era poets 1st-century BC writers 1st-century BC Romans 1st-century BC Roman poets Bucolic poets Epic poets Didactic poets People from the Province of Mantua 70 BC births 19 BC deaths Ancient LGBT people Hidden categories: Webarchive template wayback links CS1 Italian-language sources (it) Harv and Sfn no-target errors Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the 1906 Jewish Encyclopedia Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the 1906 Jewish Encyclopedia without a Wikisource reference Wikipedia articles incorporating text from the 1906 Jewish Encyclopedia Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata Use dmy dates from May 2020 Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases from August 2011 Pages using Sister project links with hidden wikidata Pages using Sister project links with default search Articles with Project Gutenberg links Articles with Internet Archive links Articles with LibriVox links Articles with Encyclopædia Britannica links Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNC identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with BPN identifiers Wikipedia articles with CANTIC identifiers Wikipedia articles with CINII identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ICCU identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with LNB identifiers Wikipedia articles with MusicBrainz identifiers Wikipedia articles with NDL identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLG identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLI identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLP identifiers Wikipedia articles with NSK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with RERO identifiers Wikipedia articles with RSL identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SNAC-ID identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with Trove identifiers Wikipedia articles with ULAN identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers AC with 31 elements Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikiquote Wikisource Languages Адыгэбзэ Адыгабзэ Afrikaans Alemannisch አማርኛ Аҧсшәа العربية Aragonés Asturianu Azərbaycanca تۆرکجه বাংলা Bân-lâm-gú Башҡортса Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ भोजपुरी Bislama Български Boarisch བོད་ཡིག Bosanski Brezhoneg Буряад Català Чӑвашла Čeština Corsu Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Emiliàn e rumagnòl Эрзянь Español Esperanto Estremeñu Euskara فارسی Fiji Hindi Français Frysk Furlan Gaeilge Gàidhlig Galego 贛語 客家語/Hak-kâ-ngî 한국어 Հայերեն हिन्दी Hrvatski Ido Ilokano Bahasa Indonesia Interlingua Ирон Íslenska Italiano עברית Jawa Kabɩyɛ ქართული Қазақша Kernowek Kiswahili Kriyòl gwiyannen Kurdî Кыргызча Ladin Latina Latviešu Lëtzebuergesch Лезги Lietuvių Lingua Franca Nova Livvinkarjala Lumbaart Magyar मैथिली Македонски Malagasy മലയാളം Malti मराठी მარგალური مصرى مازِرونی Bahasa Melayu Mirandés Монгол မြန်မာဘာသာ Nederlands नेपाल भाषा 日本語 Нохчийн Norsk bokmål Norsk nynorsk Occitan Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча ਪੰਜਾਬੀ پنجابی Patois ភាសាខ្មែរ Picard Piemontèis Plattdüütsch Polski Português Qaraqalpaqsha Ripoarisch Română Русиньскый Русский Саха тыла Gagana Samoa ᱥᱟᱱᱛᱟᱲᱤ Sardu Scots Seeltersk Shqip Sicilianu Simple English Slovenčina Slovenščina کوردی Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Tagalog தமிழ் Tarandíne Татарча/tatarça ไทย Türkçe Тыва дыл Удмурт Українська اردو Vèneto Vepsän kel’ Tiếng Việt Volapük Võro Winaray 吴语 ייִדיש Yorùbá 粵語 Zazaki Zeêuws Žemaitėška 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 27 December 2020, at 22:23 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1807 ---- Category:Pages using Sister project links with wikidata mismatch - Wikipedia Help Category:Pages using Sister project links with wikidata mismatch From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search This is a tracking category. It is used to build and maintain lists of pages—primarily for the sake of the lists themselves and their use in article and category maintenance. It is not part of the encyclopedia's categorization scheme. Pages in this category have a explicit link argument that conflicts with the sitelink in Wikidata. More information: This category is hidden on its member pages—unless the corresponding user preference is set. These categories are used to track, build and organize lists of pages needing "attention en masse" (for example, pages using deprecated syntax), or that may need to be edited at someone's earliest convenience. These categories also serve to aggregate members of several lists or sub-categories into a larger, more efficient list (discriminated by classifications). Pages in category "Pages using Sister project links with wikidata mismatch" The following 200 pages are in this category, out of approximately 328 total. This list may not reflect recent changes (learn more). (previous page) (next page)B Advertising Bicycle Cold War JSON List of programming languages Rubik's Cube Thalassery cuisine Ubuntu Unix Birmingham, Alabama C 2011–2013 Russian protests 2014 FIFA World Cup 2016 United States presidential election recounts Agatha Christie Agra Ahrar al-Sham Amazon River Ambrosius Holbein Anne Hathaway Ashton Irwin Assembly language Aucassin and Nicolette Bell hooks Beyoncé Buckminsterfullerene C. Auguste Dupin C. Kunalan Calum Hood Canary Islands Catherine of Aragon Clovis, New Mexico COVID-19 drug development Database Delicatessen Dendritic cell Dengue fever Disease Dolores O'Riordan E-commerce Elizabeth Warren 2020 presidential campaign Éva Henger Executive Order 13769 Fenyr SuperSport Fiction Flip-flops Friends George Hampson George Washington University Gilligan's Island Haiku (operating system) Henry E. Steinway Huey Long Human history Huygens (spacecraft) Ido Incroyables and merveilleuses Inverse function IPhone 4 IPhone 7 Jan Polack Jim Morrison Johann Baptist Walpoth John Calvin Judo Jyoti Basu Kidnapping of Jaycee Dugard Las Palmas List of flamenco guitarists Louis Black Lubo Kristek Luke Hemmings Lunar eclipse Marie Antoinette Mark Millar Matthias Gerung Michael Clifford (musician) Microbiome Mohammed bin Salman Monetary economics Niels Bohr Northern Sun Battalion Palestinian territories Palmach Partial differential equation Père Lachaise Cemetery Preparation (principle) President of the United States Privy Council of the United Kingdom Radium Rayon Reynard the Fox Robert Mueller Robot Rock and roll Rock music Roof tent Rumi São Luís, Maranhão Scalable Vector Graphics Scottish independence Self-build Sign language Sofmap Sophie B. Hawkins Soviet Union Synth-pop The Avengers (2012 film) The Immaculate Conception (Tiepolo) The Rachidia The Tragically Hip Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers Vegeta Vomero West Frisian language William Crooke Wolf Huber Wolfram Mathematica D Decatur, Georgia E The Everly Brothers L Lakeland, Florida N Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani Al-Qaeda Q 2001: A Space Odyssey (film) Al-Ma'arri Alfred, Lord Tennyson Apocalypse Aroma compound Arthur Eddington Balkans Catwoman Dave Matthews Discourse on Voluntary Servitude Girls (TV series) Go (game) Human Joker (character) Jonathan Edwards (theologian) Kali Kālidāsa Keshub Chandra Sen L. L. Zamenhof Lisp (programming language) Ma Anand Sheela Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 Martin Luther King Jr. May 68 Muslim world Outrageous Betrayal Prometheus (2012 film) Robert Chambers (publisher, born 1802) September 11 attacks Spring (season) Stranger Things The Thing (1982 film) The Three Stooges Tommy Robinson (activist) Viswanathan Anand Westboro Baptist Church S Ali ibn Husayn Zayn al-Abidin Anton Chekhov Barney Frank Benjamin N. Cardozo Bernie Sanders Bertrand Russell C. S. Lewis Calvin Coolidge Carl von Clausewitz Charles Dickens Colin Powell Constitution of the Autonomous Administration of North and East Syria Constitution of the United States David Petraeus Denzil Ibbetson Dolores Ibárruri Dwight D. Eisenhower Eddie August Schneider Elizabeth Blackwell Émile Durkheim Émile Zola Ernst Georg Ravenstein Fernando Pessoa Fyodor Dostoevsky G. K. Chesterton George III Gerald Ford Grover Cleveland Hannah Glasse Helen Keller Horace J. R. R. Tolkien James Clark McReynolds James Fergusson (architect) Jim McGovern (American politician) Joe Biden John Brown (abolitionist) John F. Kennedy John Manners, 7th Duke of Rutland John Marshall John Marshall Harlan John S. Mosby (previous page) (next page) Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Pages_using_Sister_project_links_with_wikidata_mismatch&oldid=995954028" Hidden categories: Hidden categories Tracking category for Sister project links Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Category Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Add links This page was last edited on 23 December 2020, at 19:26 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1815 ---- CiNii - Wikipedia CiNii From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia   (Redirected from CiNii (identifier)) Jump to navigation Jump to search CiNii Producer National Institute of Informatics (Japan) History 2005–present Languages Japanese, English Access Cost Free; Subscription for full-text Coverage Disciplines Multidisciplinary Record depth Index, abstract & full-text Format coverage Journal articles and books Temporal coverage 1906–present Geospatial coverage Japan No. of records 22 million Links Website http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ CiNii (/ˈsaɪniː/)[1] is a bibliographic database service for material in Japanese academic libraries, especially focusing on Japanese works and English works published in Japan. The database was founded in April 2005 and is maintained by the National Institute of Informatics.[2] The service searches from within the databases maintained by the NII itself [NII Electronic Library Service (NII-ELS) and Citation Database for Japanese Publications (CJP)], as well as the databases provided by the National Diet Library of Japan, institutional repositories, and other organizations.[3] The database contains more than 22 million articles from more than 3,600 publications.[4] A typical month (in 2012) saw more than 30 million accesses from 2.2 million unique visitors,[5] and is the largest and most comprehensive database of its kind in Japan. Although the database is multidisciplinary, the largest portion of the queries it receives is in the humanities and social sciences field, perhaps because CiNii is the only database that covers Japanese scholarly works in this field (as opposed to the natural, formal, and medical sciences which benefit from other databases).[6] Contents 1 Database identifiers 1.1 NCID examples 2 See also 3 References 4 External links Database identifiers[edit] The database assigns a unique identifier, NII Article ID (NAID), to each of its journal article entries.[5] A different identifier, NII Citation ID (NCID or 書誌ID) aka NACSIS-CAT Record ID, is used for books. NCID examples[edit] NCID BA04004867 for the 1951 Little, Brown edition and of The Catcher in the Rye NCID BB17611495 for the 2010 Penguin edition of The Catcher in the Rye NCID BA36680090 for a 1952 edition of Kiken na nenrei (危険な年齢), NCID BN01880084 for a 1964 edition of Rai-mugi batake de tsukamaete (ライ麦畑でつかまえて), and NCID BA61718322 for a 2003 edition of Kyatchā in za rai (キャッチャー・イン・ザ・ライ), all three being Japanese translations of The Catcher in the Rye NCID BB13715590 for a 1997 edition of Mai tian li de shou wang zhe (麦田里的守望者), a Chinese translation of The Catcher in the Rye. Identifiers are also assigned to authors of books, and of journal articles, in two separate series (so an author may have a different identifier value in each). For example, Shinsaku Kimoto is DA00432173 for books and 9000002393144 for journal articles. See also[edit] List of academic databases and search engines References[edit] ^ "About CiNii". CiNii. Retrieved 2014-02-23. ^ 大向一輝 (Ohmukai, Ikki) (2009). "学術情報プラットフォームとしてのCiNii". Current Awareness (301). CA1691. ^ "Databases Incorporated". CiNii. Retrieved 2014-02-23. ^ "titlelist_els.tsv". CiNii. 2014-02-15. Retrieved 2014-02-23. ^ a b 大向一輝 (Ohmukai, Ikki) (2012). "System design and data modeling of CiNii articles". The Journal of Information Science and Technology Association. 62 (11): 473–477. ^ 日詰梨恵 (Hizume, Rie); 逸村裕 (Itsumura, Hiroshi) (2010). "CiNii 収録率から見たわが国の学術情報電子化の現状:人文学4領域を対象に". 中部図書館情報学会誌. 50: 19–35. hdl:2241/105270. External links[edit] Wikidata has the properties: CiNii author ID (books) (P271) (see uses) CiNii book ID (P1739) (see uses) CiNii article ID (P2409) (see uses) CiNii author ID (articles) (P4787) (see uses) CiNii CiNii in English v t e Authority control files AAG • ACM DL • ADB • AGSA • autores.uy • AWR • BALaT • BIBSYS • Bildindex • BNC • BNE • BNF • Botanist • BPN • CANTIC • CiNii • CWGC • DAAO • DBLP • DSI • FNZA • GND • HDS • IAAF • ICCU • ICIA • ISNI • Joconde • KulturNav • LCCN • LIR • LNB • Léonore • MBA • MGP • NARA • NBL • NDL • NGV • NKC • NLA • NLG • NLI • NLK • NLP • NLR • NSK • NTA • ORCID • PIC • ResearcherID • RERO • RKD • RKDimages ID • RSL • SELIBR • SIKART • SNAC • SUDOC • S2AuthorId • TA98 • TDVİA • TE • TePapa • TH • TLS • Trove • UKPARL • ULAN • US Congress • VcBA • VIAF • WorldCat Identities Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=CiNii&oldid=995120545" Categories: Bibliographic databases and indexes Databases in Japan Japanese studies 2005 establishments in Japan Hidden categories: Articles containing Japanese-language text AC with 0 elements Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Afrikaans العربية Asturianu Bân-lâm-gú भोजपुरी Dansk Ελληνικά Español Euskara فارسی Français Gàidhlig Galego 한국어 Ilokano Bahasa Indonesia עברית مصرى Bahasa Melayu 日本語 Português Русский Simple English Slovenščina Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Українська Tiếng Việt 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 19 December 2020, at 09:50 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1819 ---- Pindarics - Wikipedia Pindarics From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Pindarics (alternatively Pindariques or Pindaricks) was a term for a class of loose and irregular odes greatly in fashion in England during the close of the 17th and the beginning of the 18th century.[1] Abraham Cowley, who published fifteen Pindarique Odes in 1656, was the poet most identified with the form though many others had composed irregular verses before him.[2] The term is derived from the name of a Greek archaic poet, Pindar, but is based on a misconception since Pindar's odes were in fact very formal, obeying a triadic structure, in which the form of the first stanza (strophe) was repeated in the second stanza (antistrophe), followed by a third stanza (epode) that introduced variations but whose form was repeated by other epodes in subsequent triads. Cowley's Resurrection, which was considered in the 17th century to be a model of the 'pindaric' style, is a formless poem of sixty-four lines, arbitrarily divided, not into triads, but into four stanzas of unequal volume and structure; the lines which form these stanzas are of lengths varying from three feet to seven feet, with rhymes repeated in no order.[1] It was the looseness of these 'pindarics' that appealed to many poets at the close of the 17th century, including John Dryden and Alexander Pope, and many lesser poets, such as John Oldham, Aphra Behn, Thomas Otway, Thomas Sprat, John Hughes and Thomas Flatman. John Milton employed 'pindarics' for the chorus of his lyrical tragedy, Samson Agonistes, published in 1670/71 (and probably composed in the 1660s) but he was a classical scholar and he termed them more appropriately: "The measure of verse used in the chorus is of all sorts, called by the Greeks 'monostrophic', or rather 'apolelymenon', without regard had to strophe, antistrophe or epode, which were a kind of stanzas framed only for the music, then used with the chorus that sung; not essential to the poem and therefore not material; or, being divided into stanzas or pauses, they may be called 'alloeostropha'."[nb 1] The form in this sense can be thought to be modelled on the works of the tragic poet Aeschylus, as noted by Milton's nephew, Edward Phillips: "...that which we call the pindaric hath a nearer affinity with the monostrophic or apolelymenon used in the chorus's of Aeschylus's tragedies."[3] Phillips was one of his uncle's pupils and his views may have been shaped by Milton's theories as early as the 1640s yet he also reproduced some of the great poet's later views and his reactions to the literary fashions of the Restoration.[4] Thus he contrasts 'pindarics' with rhyming couplets as a verse form suited to tragedy: "...that way of versifying which bears the name of Pindaric and which hath no necessity of being divided into strophs or stanzas would be much more suitable for tragedy than the continued rhapsody of rhyming couplets, which whoever shall mark it well will find it appear too stiff and of too much constraint for the liberty of conversation and the interlocution of several persons."[5] In Discourse on the Pindarique Ode, 1706, the dramatist William Congreve, reviled pindarics as "bundles of rambling incoherent thoughts" and "uncertain and perplexed verses and rhymes".[1] Joseph Addison dismissed them in 1711 in the journal The Spectator as monstrous Compositions.[6] Richard Steele in an entry in the Spectator the following year underscored the difference between English pindarics and the verse of Pindar by imagining the Greek poet in Cowley's company—but not for long: "I saw Pindar walking all alone, no one daring to accost him till Cowley joyn'd himself to him, but, growing weary of one who almost walk'd him out of Breath, he left him for Horace and Anacreon, with whom he seemed infinitely delighted."[7] The pindaric came to be commonly used for complimentary poems on births, weddings and funerals. Although the vogue of these forms hardly survived the age of Queen Anne, something of the tradition still remained, and even in the odes of Wordsworth, Shelley and Coleridge the broken versification of Cowley's pindarics occasionally survives. Tennyson's Ode on the Death of the Duke of Wellington (1852) may be considered another specimen of a pindaric in English literature,[1] as seen for example in the opening and closing lines: Bury the Great Duke With an empire's lamentation, Let us bury the Great Duke To the noise of the mourning of a mighty nation, Mourning when their leaders fall, Warriors carry the warrior's pall, And sorrow darkens hamlet and hall... Ashes to ashes, dust to dust; He is gone who seem'd so great. Gone; but nothing can bereave him Of the force he made his own Being here, and we believe him Something far advanced in State, And that he wears a truer crown Than any wreath that man can weave him. Speak no more of his renown, Lay your earthly fancies down, And in the vast cathedral leave him, God accept him, Christ receive him. Notes[edit] ^ Milton's Preface to Samson Agonistes, where apolelymenon denotes verses free from stanzaic patterns, and alloeostropha denotes strophes or stanzas of varying form—see Douglas Bush (ed), Milton: Poetical Works, Oxford University Press (1966), page 518 References[edit] ^ a b c d  One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Gosse, Edmund William (1911). "Pindarics". In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. 21 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 620. ^ David Money, 'The seventeenth and eighteenth centuries' in The Cambridge Companion to Horace, Stephen Harrison (ed), Cambridge University Press (2007), page 328 ^ Edward Phillips, Preface to 'Theatrum Poetarum', cited by Allan H. Gilbert (ed) in Literary Criticism: Plato to Dryden, Wayne Books, reprinted 1982, page 670 ^ Allan H. Gilbert (ed), Literary Criticism: Plato to Dryden, Wayne Books, reprinted 1982, page 667 ^ Edward Phillips, Preface to 'Theatrum Poetarum', cited by Allan H. Gilbert (ed) in Literary Criticism: Plato to Dryden, Wayne Books, reprinted 1982, pages 676-77 ^ Joseph Addison, Spectator 160, 3 September 1711, cited by David Money, 'The seventeenth and eighteenth centuries' in The Cambridge Companion to Horace, Stephen Harrison (ed), Cambridge University Press (2007), page 328 ^ Richard Steele, Spectator 514, 20 October 1712, cited by David Money, 'The seventeenth and eighteenth centuries' in The Cambridge Companion to Horace, Stephen Harrison (ed), Cambridge University Press (2007), page 328 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pindarics&oldid=901399909" Categories: Literature of England Hidden categories: Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica with Wikisource reference Wikipedia articles incorporating text from the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Add links This page was last edited on 11 June 2019, at 16:31 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1836 ---- Interrex - Wikipedia Interrex From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search For the interrex of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, see Interrex (Poland). The interrex (plural interreges) was literally a ruler "between kings" (Latin inter reges) during the Roman Kingdom and the Roman Republic. He was in effect a short-term regent. The office of interrex was supposedly created following the death of Rome's first king Romulus, and thus its origin is obscured by legend. The Senate of the Roman Kingdom was at first unable to choose a new king. For the purpose of continuing the government of the city, the senate, which then consisted of one hundred members, was divided into ten decuriae (groups of ten); and from each of these decuriae one senator was nominated as decurio. Each of the ten decuriones in succession held the regal power and its badges for five days as interrex; and if no king had been appointed at the expiration of fifty days, the rotation began anew. The period during which they exercised their power was called an interregnum, and on that occasion lasted for one year, after which Numa Pompilius was elected as the new king.[1] After the death of each subsequent king, an interrex was appointed by the senate. His function was to call a meeting of the Comitia Curiata, which would elect a new king.[2] Under the Republic, interreges were appointed to hold the comitia for the election of the consuls when the consuls, through civil commotion or other cause such as death, had been unable to do so during their year of office. Each interrex held the office for only five days, as under the kings. The comitia were, as a general rule, not held by the first interrex, who was originally the curio maximus, but more usually by the second or third; but in one instance we read of an eleventh, and in another of a fourteenth interrex. The comitia to elect the first consuls were held by Spurius Lucretius Tricipitinus as interrex was also called praefectus urbis.[clarification needed] The interreges under the republic, at least from 482 BC, were elected from ex-consuls by the senate, and were not confined to the decem primi or ten chief senators as under the kings. Plebeians, however, were not admissible to this office; and consequently when the senate included plebeians, the patrician senators met together without the plebeian members to elect an interrex. For this reason, as well as on account of the influence which the interrex exerted in the election of the magistrates, we find that the tribunes of the plebs were strongly opposed to the appointment of an interrex. The interrex had jurisdictio.[clarification needed] Interreges continued to be appointed occasionally until the time of the Second Punic War. After that no interrex was appointed until the senate, by command of Sulla, named L. Valerius Flaccus to hold the comitia for his election as Dictator in 82 BC. In 55 BC another interrex was appointed to hold the comitia in which Pompey and Crassus were elected consuls. There were interreges in 53 and 52 BC; in 52 an interrex held the comitia in which Pompey was appointed sole consul. List of Roman interreges (509 - 52 BC)[edit] Unless otherwise indicated, the names and dates of the interreges are taken from Thomas Broughton's The Magistrates of the Roman Republic.[3] Year Interrex note 509 Sp. Lucretius Tricipitinus 482 A. Sempronius Atratinus, 1st Sp. Lartius Flavus, 2nd 462 P. Valerius Poplicola 444 T. Quinctius Capitolinus Barbatus 420 L. Papirius Mugillanus 413 Q. Fabius Vibulanus 396 L. Valerius Potitus Q. Servilius Fidenas M. Furius Camillus 391 M. Furius Camillus II P. Cornelius Scipio L. Valerius Potitus II 389 P. Cornelius Scipio II M. Furius Camillus III 387 M. Manlius Capitolinus Ser. Sulpicius Camerinus L. Valerius Potitus III 355 Q. Servilius Ahala I & II M. Fabius Ambustus I & II Cn. Manlius Capitolinus Imperiosus C. Fabius Ambustus C. Sulpicius Peticus L. Aemilius Mamercinus Servilius & M. Fabius appointed twice 352 11 unknown interreges L. Cornelius Scipio Cornelius as the twelfth of a series of interreges 351 C. Sulpicius Peticus II M. Fabius Ambustus III 340 M. Valerius Corvus M. Fabius Ambustus IV? or M. Fabius Dursuo 332 4 unknown interreges M. Valerius Corvus II Valerius as the fifth and last of a series of interreges 326 14 unknown interreges L. Aemilius Mamercinus Privernas Aemilius as the fifteenth of a series of interreges 320 Q. Fabius Maximus Rullianus M. Valerius Corvus III 298 Ap. Claudius Caecus P. Sulpicius Saverrio 291 L. Postumius Megellus 222 Q. Fabius Maximus Verrucosus? Fabius was twice Interrex, both at unknown dates. This is one possible date as suggested by Broughton. 216 C. Claudius Centho P. Cornelius Scipio Asina Scipio held the comitia that elected the consul Varro 208? Q. Fabius Maximus Verrucosus II? Mommsen and Broughton suggests this as a possible date for Fabius as interrex. Livy instead attributes the elections to the Dictator, T. Manlius Torquatus 82 L. Valerius Flaccus 55 53 52 References[edit] "Oxford Classical Dictionary: Interrex". Oxford Classical Dictionary. Oxford Research Encyclopedias. Retrieved 14 May 2019. ^ Livy, Ab urbe condita, 1:17 ^ see e.g. Livy, Ab urbe condita, 1:32 ^ Broughton, T. Robert S. (1952). The magistrates of the Roman Republic. American Philological Association. OCLC 1120836609. v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Interrex&oldid=993058640" Categories: Ancient Roman titles Monarchy Regents Hidden categories: Wikipedia articles needing clarification from November 2009 Wikipedia articles needing clarification from May 2015 Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Azərbaycanca Bân-lâm-gú Български Català Deutsch Español Français Bahasa Indonesia Italiano עברית ქართული Latina Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Polski Português Русский Српски / srpski Türkçe Українська Edit links This page was last edited on 8 December 2020, at 16:01 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1877 ---- Imperium - Wikipedia Imperium From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search For other uses, see Imperium (disambiguation). This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages) This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Imperium" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (December 2007) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. No cleanup reason has been specified. Please help improve this article if you can. (July 2010) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) This article appears to be a dictionary definition. Please rewrite it to present the subject from an encyclopedic point of view. If it cannot be turned into a full encyclopedia article in the near future, consider moving it to Wiktionary. Steps for moving to Wiktionary: Check that this article meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion. Check that Wiktionary does not have an article on this word or phrase, as verified using the search page. If Wiktionary has a definition already, change this tag to {{TWCleanup2}} or else consider a soft redirect to Wiktionary by replacing the text on this page with {{Wi}}. If Wiktionary does not have the definition yet, consider moving the whole article to Wiktionary by replacing this tag with the template {{Copy to Wiktionary}}. This template will no longer automatically categorize articles as candidates to move to Wiktionary. (Learn how and when to remove this template message) Look up imperium in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. In ancient Rome, imperium was a form of authority held by a citizen to control a military or governmental entity. It is distinct from auctoritas and potestas, different and generally inferior types of power in the Roman Republic and Empire. One's imperium could be over a specific military unit, or it could be over a province or territory. Individuals given such power were referred to as curule magistrates or promagistrates. These included the curule aedile, the praetor, the consul, the magister equitum, and the dictator. In a general sense, imperium was the scope of someone's power, and could include anything, such as public office, commerce, political influence, or wealth. Contents 1 Ancient Rome 2 Later Roman Empire 3 Divine and earthly imperium 4 See also 5 References 6 Further reading Ancient Rome[edit] Imperium originally meant absolute or kingly power—the word being derived from the Latin verb imperare (to command)—which became somewhat limited under the republic by the collegiality of the republican magistrates and the right of appeal, or provocatio, on the part of citizens. Imperium remained absolute in the army, and the power of the imperator (army commander) to punish remained uncurtailed. The title imperator later was exclusively held by the emperor, as the commander of the armed forces. In fact, the Latin word imperator is the root of the English word emperor.[1][2] In ancient Rome, imperium could be used as a term indicating a characteristic of people, their wealth in property, or the measure of formal power they had. This qualification could be used in a rather loose context (for example, poets used it, not necessarily writing about state officials). However, in Roman society, it was also a more formal concept of legal authority. A man with imperium (an imperator) had, in principle, absolute authority to apply the law within the scope of his magistracy or promagistracy. He could be vetoed or overruled either by a magistrate or promagistrate who was a colleague with equal power (e.g. a fellow consul), by one whose imperium outranked his – that is, one of imperium maius (greater imperium), or by a tribune of the people. Some modern scholars such as A. H. M. Jones have defined imperium as "the power vested by the state in a person to do what he considers to be in the best interests of the state".[citation needed] Imperium was indicated in two prominent ways: a curule magistrate or promagistrate carried an ivory baton surmounted by an eagle as his personal symbol of office (compare the field marshal's baton);[citation needed] any such magistrate was also escorted by lictors bearing the fasces (traditional symbols of imperium and authority), when outside the pomerium, axes being added to the fasces to indicate an imperial magistrate's power to inflict capital punishment outside Rome (the axes being removed within the pomerium). The number of lictors in attendance upon a magistrate was an overt indication of the degree of imperium. When in the field, a curule magistrate possessing an imperium greater or equal to that of a praetor wore a sash ritually knotted on the front of his cuirass. Furthermore, any man executing imperium within his sphere of influence was entitled to the curule chair. Curule aedile (aedilis curulis) – 2 lictors Since a plebeian aedile (aedilis plebis) was not vested with imperium, he was not escorted by lictors. Magister equitum (the dictator's deputy) – 6 lictors Praetor – 6 lictors (2 lictors within the pomerium) Consul – 12 lictors each Dictator – 24 lictors outside the pomerium and 12 inside; starting from the dictatorship of Lucius Sulla the latter rule was ignored. To symbolize that the dictator could enact capital punishment within Rome as well as without, his lictors did not remove the axes from their fasces within the pomerium. As can be seen, dictatorial imperium was superior to consular, consular to praetorian, and praetorian to aedilician; there is some historical dispute as to whether or not praetorian imperium was superior to "equine-magisterial" imperium. A promagistrate, or a man executing a curule office without actually holding that office, also possessed imperium in the same degree as the actual incumbents (i.e., proconsular imperium being more or less equal to consular imperium, propraetorian imperium to praetorian) and was attended by an equal number of lictors. Certain extraordinary commissions, such as Pompey's famous command against the pirates, were invested with imperium maius meaning they outranked all other owners of imperium of the same type or rank (in Pompey's case, even the consuls) within their sphere of command (his being "ultimate on the seas, and within 50 miles inland"). Imperium maius later became a hallmark of the Roman emperor. Another technical use of the term in Roman law was for the power to extend the law beyond its mere interpretation, extending imperium from formal legislators under the ever-republican constitution: popular assemblies, senate, magistrates, emperor and their delegates to the jurisprudence of jurisconsults. Later Roman Empire[edit] While the Byzantine Eastern Roman Emperors retained full Roman imperium and made the episcopate subservient, in the feudal West a long rivalry would oppose the claims to supremacy within post-Roman Christianity between sacerdotium in the person of the Pope and the secular imperium of the Holy Roman Emperor, beginning with Charlemagne, whose title was claimed to have "restored" the office of Western Roman Emperor among the new kingdoms of Western Europe. Both would refer to the heritage of Roman law by their titular link with the very city Rome: the Pope, Bishop of Rome, versus the Holy Roman Emperor (even though his seat of power was north of the Alps). The Donatio Constantini, by which the Papacy had allegedly been granted the territorial Patrimonium Petri in Central Italy, became a weapon against the Emperor. The first pope who used it in an official act and relied upon it, Leo IX, cites the "Donatio" in a letter of 1054 to Michael Cærularius, Patriarch of Constantinople, to show that the Holy See possessed both an earthly and a heavenly imperium, the royal priesthood. Thenceforth the "Donatio" acquires more importance and is more frequently used as evidence in the ecclesiastical and political conflicts between the papacy and the secular power: Anselm of Lucca and Cardinal Deusdedit inserted it in their collections of canons; Gratian excluded it from his Decretum, but it was soon added to it as Palea; the ecclesiastical writers in defence of the papacy during the conflicts of the early part of the 12th century quoted it as authoritative. In one bitter episode, Pope Gregory IX, who had several times mediated between the Lombards and the Holy Roman Emperor Frederick II, reasserted his right to arbitrate between the contending parties. In the numerous manifestos of the Pope and the Emperor the antagonism between Church and State became more evident: the Pope claimed for himself the imperium animarum ("command of the souls", i.e. voicing God's will to the faithful) and the principatus rerum et corporum in universo mundo ("primacy over all things and bodies in the whole world"), while the Emperor wished to restore the imperium mundi, imperium (as under Roman Law) over the (now Christian) world. Rome was again to be the capital of the world and Frederick was to become the real emperor of the Romans, so he energetically protested against the authority of the Pope. The emperor's successes, especially his victory over the Lombards at the battle of Cortenuova (1237), only aggravated tensions between Church and State. The pope again excommunicated the "self-confessed heretic", the "blasphemous beast of the Apocalypse" (20 March 1239) who now attempted to conquer the rest of Italy (i.e. the papal states, et cetera). Divine and earthly imperium[edit] In some monotheistic religions such as Christianity (the Catholic Church where the official language, Latin, used terms as Imperium Dei/Domini) the Divine is held to have a superior imperium, as ultimate King of Kings, above all earthly powers. Whenever a society accepts this Divine will to be expressed on earth, as by a religious authority, this can lead to theocratic legitimation. However, the Catholic Church and most other Christian groups acknowledge the authority of secular governments. If however, a secular ruler controls the religious hierarchy, he can use it to legitimize his own authority. Thus absolute, universal power was vested under early Islam in the original Caliphate, and later again claimed by Mahdis. The chief minister of Henry VIII, the Archbishop of Canterbury Thomas Cranmer suggested removal of the Roman Catholic papacy's imperium in imperio (Latin for "state within a state") by requesting that Parliament pass the Act in Restraint of Appeals (1533) specifying that England was an empire and that The Crown was imperial, and a year later the Act of Supremacy proclaiming the Imperial Crown Protector and Supreme Head of the Church of England.[citation needed] In Orthodox Russia too, when Peter I the Great assumed the Byzantine imperial titles Imperator and Autokrator, instead of the royal Tsar, the idea in founding the Russian Holy Synod was to put an end to the old Imperium in imperio of the free Church, by substituting the synod for the all too independent Patriarch of Moscow, which had become almost a rival of the Tsars — Peter meant to unite all authority in himself, over Church as well as State: through his Ober-Procurator and synod, the Emperor ruled his Church as absolutely as the military through their respective ministries; he appointed its members just as he did generals; and the Russian Government continued his policy until the end of the empire in 1917. See also[edit] Imperator Constitution of the Roman Republic Cursus honorum Translatio imperii References[edit] ^ "Etymology of the word emperor". Retrieved 13 January 2018. ^ Hornblower, Simon; Spawforth, Antony, eds. (1996). "Imperium". Oxford Classical Dictionary (3rd ed.). Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 751–752. ISBN 978-0-19-866172-6. Retrieved 31 October 2020. Further reading[edit] Cary, M. (1967). A History of Rome Down to the Reign of Constantine (2nd ed.). New York: St. Martin's Press. pp. 56–58, 79, 80, 115, 124, 249, 476, 479, 492.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link) v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films  This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Herbermann, Charles, ed. (1913). "Donation of Constantine". Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Imperium&oldid=994696317" Categories: Ancient Roman government Philosophy of law Political philosophy Roman law Government of the Roman Empire Hidden categories: Articles needing additional references from December 2007 All articles needing additional references Articles needing cleanup from July 2010 All pages needing cleanup Cleanup tagged articles without a reason field from July 2010 Wikipedia pages needing cleanup from July 2010 Flagged dictionary definitions Articles with multiple maintenance issues All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from December 2015 Articles with unsourced statements from October 2020 Articles with unsourced statements from February 2014 CS1 maint: ref=harv Articles incorporating a citation from the 1913 Catholic Encyclopedia with Wikisource reference Articles incorporating text from the 1913 Catholic Encyclopedia with Wikisource reference Use dmy dates from November 2011 Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages العربية Български Català Čeština Deutsch Eesti Español Esperanto Føroyskt Français 한국어 Bahasa Indonesia Italiano עברית ქართული Magyar Македонски Nederlands 日本語 Polski Português Română Русский Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Türkçe Українська 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 17 December 2020, at 02:08 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1898 ---- View source for Template:Ancient Rome topics - Wikipedia View source for Template:Ancient Rome topics ← Template:Ancient Rome topics Jump to navigation Jump to search You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons: Your IP address is in a range that has been blocked on all Wikimedia Foundation wikis. The block was made by Jon Kolbert (meta.wikimedia.org). The reason given is Open Proxy: Webhost: Contact stewards if you are affected . Start of block: 20:12, 23 July 2019 Expiry of block: 20:12, 23 January 2022 Your current IP address is 40.76.139.33 and the blocked range is 40.76.0.0/16. Please include all above details in any queries you make. If you believe you were blocked by mistake, you can find additional information and instructions in the No open proxies global policy. Otherwise, to discuss the block please post a request for review on Meta-Wiki or send an email to the stewards OTRS queue at stewards@wikimedia.org including all above details. This page is currently semi-protected so that only established, registered users can edit it. Why is the page protected? While most articles can be edited by anyone, semi-protection is sometimes necessary to prevent vandalism to popular pages. The reason for protection can be found in the protection log. If there are no relevant entries in the protection log, the page may have been moved after being protected. What can I do? If you have a user account, log in first. If you do not yet have an account, you may create one; after 4 days and 10 edits, you will be able to edit semi-protected pages. Discuss this page with others. For move-protected pages, see requested moves. Request that the page's protection level be reduced. Find out more about how to get started editing Wikipedia. If you have noticed an error or have a suggestion for a simple, non-controversial change, you can submit an edit request, by clicking the button below and following instructions. An established user may then make the change on your behalf. Please check the talk page first in case the issue is already being discussed. Submit an edit request You are currently unable to edit Wikipedia due to a block affecting your IP address. This does not affect your ability to read Wikipedia pages. Most people who see this message have done nothing wrong. Some kinds of blocks restrict editing from specific service providers or telecom companies in response to recent abuse or vandalism, and affect other users who are unrelated to that abuse. See below if you do not believe you have done anything wrong. Editing from 40.76.0.0/16 has been blocked (disabled) by ‪SQL‬ for the following reason(s): The IP address that you are currently using has been blocked because it is believed to be a web host provider or colocation provider. To prevent abuse, web hosts and colocation providers may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You will not be able to edit Wikipedia using a web host or colocation provider because it hides your IP address, much like a proxy or VPN. We recommend that you attempt to use another connection to edit. For example, if you use a proxy or VPN to connect to the internet, turn it off when editing Wikipedia. If you edit using a mobile connection, try using a Wi-Fi connection, and vice versa. If you have a Wikipedia account, please log in. If you do not have any other way to edit Wikipedia, you will need to request an IP block exemption. If you are confident that you are not using a web host, you may appeal this block by adding the following text on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is _______. Place any further information here. ~~~~}}. You must fill in the blank with your IP address for this block to be investigated. Your IP address can be determined here. Alternatively, if you wish to keep your IP address private you can use the unblock ticket request system. There are several reasons you might be editing using the IP address of a web host or colocation provider (such as if you are using VPN software or a business network); please use this method of appeal only if you think your IP address is in fact not a web host or colocation provider. Administrators: The IP block exemption user right should only be applied to allow users to edit using web host in exceptional circumstances, and requests should usually be directed to the functionaries team via email. If you intend to give the IPBE user right, a CheckUser needs to take a look at the account. This can be requested most easily at SPI Quick Checkuser Requests. Unblocking an IP or IP range with this template is highly discouraged without at least contacting the blocking administrator. This block has been set to expire: 16:25, 2 June 2023. Even when blocked, you will usually still be able to edit your user talk page and email other editors and administrators. For information on how to proceed, first see the FAQ for blocked users and the guideline on block appeals. The guide to appealing blocks may also be helpful. Other useful links: Blocking policy · Help:I have been blocked You can view and copy the source of this page: {{Navbox | name = Ancient Rome topics | state = {{{state|{{{1|collapsed}}}}}} | bodyclass = hlist | title = [[Ancient Rome]] topics | above = * [[Outline of ancient Rome|Outline]] * [[Timeline of Roman history|Timeline]] | group1 = [[History of Rome|History]] | list1 = {{Navbox |child |bodyclass=hlist |groupstyle=font-weight:normal; | list1 = * [[Founding of Rome|Foundation]] * [[Roman Kingdom|Kingdom]] ** [[Overthrow of the Roman monarchy|overthrow]] * [[Roman Republic|Republic]] | group2 = [[Roman Empire|Empire]] | list2 = * [[History of the Roman Empire|History]] * [[Pax Romana]] * [[Principate]] * [[Dominate]] * [[Western Roman Empire|Western Empire]] ** [[Fall of the Western Roman Empire|fall]] ** [[Historiography of the fall of the Western Roman Empire|historiography of the fall]] * [[Byzantine Empire]] ** [[Decline of the Byzantine Empire|decline]] ** [[Fall of Constantinople|fall]] }} | group3 = [[Roman Constitution|Constitution]] | list3 = * [[History of the Roman Constitution|History]] * [[Constitution of the Roman Kingdom|Kingdom]] * [[Constitution of the Roman Republic|Republic]] * [[Constitution of the Roman Empire|Empire]] * [[Constitution of the Late Roman Empire|Late Empire]] * [[Roman Senate|Senate]] * [[Roman assemblies|Legislative assemblies]] ** [[Curiate Assembly|Curiate]] ** [[Centuriate Assembly|Centuriate]] ** [[Tribal Assembly|Tribal]] ** [[Plebeian Council|Plebeian]] * [[Roman magistrate|Executive magistrates]] * [[SPQR]] | group4 = [[Roman law|Law]] | list4 = * [[Twelve Tables]] * [[Mos maiorum]] * [[Roman citizenship|Citizenship]] * [[Auctoritas]] * [[Imperium]] * [[Status in Roman legal system|Status]] * [[Roman litigation|Litigation]] | group5 = [[Political institutions of ancient Rome|Government]] | list5 = * [[Curia]] * [[Forum (Roman)|Forum]] * [[Cursus honorum]] * [[Collegiality#In the Roman Republic|Collegiality]] * [[Roman emperor|Emperor]] * [[Legatus]] * [[Dux]] * [[Officium (ancient Rome)|Officium]] * [[Prefect]] * [[Vicarius]] * [[Vigintisexviri]] * [[Lictor]] * [[Magister militum]] * [[Imperator]] * [[Princeps senatus]] * [[Pontifex Maximus]] * [[Augustus (honorific)|Augustus]] * [[Caesar (title)|Caesar]] * [[Tetrarchy|Tetrarch]] * [[Optimates]] * [[Populares]] * [[Roman province|Province]] | group6 = [[Roman magistrate|Magistrates]] | list6 = {{Navbox |child |bodyclass=hlist |groupstyle=font-weight:normal; | group1 = Ordinary | list1 = * [[Roman consul|Consul]] * [[Roman censor|Censor]] * [[Praetor]] * [[Tribune]] * [[Tribune of the Plebs]] * [[Military tribune]] * [[Quaestor]] * [[Aedile]] * [[Promagistrate]] * [[Roman governor|Governor]] | group2 = Extraordinary | list2 = * [[King of Rome|Rex]] * [[Interrex]] * [[Roman dictator|Dictator]] * [[Master of the Horse|Magister Equitum]] * [[Decemviri]] * [[Tribuni militum consulari potestate|Consular Tribune]] * [[Triumvirate|Triumvir]] }} | group7 = [[Military of ancient Rome|Military]] | list7 = * [[Military history of ancient Rome|History]] * [[Borders of the Roman Empire|Borders]] * [[Military establishment of the Roman Republic|Establishment]] * [[Structural history of the Roman military|Structure]] * [[Campaign history of the Roman military|Campaigns]] * [[Political history of the Roman military|Political control]] * [[Strategy of the Roman military|Strategy]] * [[Roman military engineering|Engineering]] * [[Roman military frontiers and fortifications|Frontiers and fortifications]] ** [[castra]] * [[Technological history of the Roman military|Technology]] * [[Roman army|Army]] ** [[Roman legion|Legion]] ** [[Roman infantry tactics|Infantry tactics]] ** [[Roman military personal equipment|Personal equipment]] ** [[Roman siege engines|Siege engines]] * [[Roman navy|Navy]] * [[Auxilia|Auxiliaries]] * [[Roman military decorations and punishments|Decorations and punishments]] * [[Hippika gymnasia]] | group8 = [[Roman economy|Economy]] | list8 = * [[Roman agriculture|Agriculture]] * [[Deforestation during the Roman period|Deforestation]] * [[Roman commerce|Commerce]] * [[Roman finance|Finance]] * [[Roman currency|Currency]] * [[Roman Republican currency|Republican currency]] * [[Roman Imperial currency|Imperial currency]] | group9 = [[Culture of ancient Rome|Culture]] | list9 = * [[Ancient Roman architecture|Architecture]] * [[Roman art|Art]] * [[Ancient Roman bathing|Bathing]] * [[Roman calendar|Calendar]] * [[Clothing in ancient Rome|Clothing]] * [[Cosmetics in ancient Rome|Cosmetics]] * [[Ancient Roman cuisine|Cuisine]] * [[Roman hairstyles|Hairstyles]] * [[Education in ancient Rome|Education]] * [[Latin literature|Literature]] * [[Music of ancient Rome|Music]] * [[Roman mythology|Mythology]] * [[Religion in ancient Rome|Religion]] **[[List of Roman deities|Deities]] * [[Romanization (cultural)|Romanization]] * [[Roman people]] * [[Sexuality in ancient Rome|Sexuality]] * [[Theatre of ancient Rome|Theatre]] * [[Ancient Rome and wine|Wine]] | group10 = [[Social class in ancient Rome|Society]] | list10 = * [[Patrician (ancient Rome)|Patricians]] * [[Plebs]] * [[Conflict of the Orders]] * [[Secessio plebis]] * [[Equites]] * [[Gens]] * [[Roman tribe|Tribes]] ** [[Tribal Assembly|Assembly]] * [[Roman naming conventions|Naming conventions]] * [[Demography of the Roman Empire|Demography]] * [[Women in ancient Rome|Women]] * [[Marriage in ancient Rome|Marriage]] * [[Adoption in ancient Rome|Adoption]] * [[Slavery in ancient Rome|Slavery]] * [[Bagaudae]] | group11 = [[Roman technology|Technology]] | list11 = * [[Roman amphitheatre|Amphitheatres]] * [[Roman aqueduct|Aqueducts]] * [[Roman bridge|Bridges]] * [[Circus (building)|Circuses]] * [[Roman engineering|Civil engineering]] * [[Roman concrete|Concrete]] * [[History of Roman and Byzantine domes|Domes]] * [[Roman metallurgy|Metallurgy]] * [[Roman numerals|Numerals]] * [[Roman roads|Roads]] * [[Roman temple|Temples]] * [[Roman theatre (structure)|Theatres]] * [[Sanitation in ancient Rome|Sanitation]] * [[Thermae]] | group13 = [[Latin]] | list13 = * [[History of Latin|History]] * [[Latin alphabet|Alphabet]] * Versions ** [[Old Latin|Old]] ** [[Classical Latin|Classical]] ** [[Vulgar Latin|Vulgar]] ** [[Late Latin|Late]] ** [[Medieval Latin|Medieval]] ** [[Renaissance Latin|Renaissance]] ** [[New Latin|New]] ** [[Contemporary Latin|Contemporary]] ** [[Ecclesiastical Latin|Ecclesiastical]] * [[Romance languages]] | group14 = [[Latin literature|Writers]] | list14 = {{Navbox |child |bodyclass=hlist |groupstyle=font-weight:normal; | group1 = Latin | list1 = * [[Aelius Donatus]] * [[Ammianus Marcellinus]] * [[Apuleius|Appuleius]] * [[Asconius Pedianus]] * [[Augustine of Hippo|Augustine]] * [[Aurelius Victor]] * [[Ausonius]] * [[Boethius|Boëthius]] * [[Julius Caesar|Caesar]] * [[Catullus]] * [[Cassiodorus]] * [[Censorinus]] * [[Cicero]] * [[Claudian]] * [[Columella]] * [[Cornelius Nepos]] * [[Ennius]] * [[Eutropius (historian)|Eutropius]] * [[Fabius Pictor]] * [[Sextus Pompeius Festus]] * [[Festus (historian)|Rufus Festus]] * [[Florus]] * [[Frontinus]] * [[Marcus Cornelius Fronto|Fronto]] * [[Fulgentius]] * [[Aulus Gellius|Gellius]] * [[Horace]] * [[Hydatius]] * [[Gaius Julius Hyginus|Hyginus]] * [[Jerome]] * [[Jordanes]] * [[Julius Paulus Prudentissimus|Julius Paulus]] * [[Justin (historian)|Justin]] * [[Juvenal]] * [[Lactantius]] * [[Livy]] * [[Lucan]] * [[Lucretius]] * [[Macrobius]] * [[Marcellus Empiricus]] * [[Marcus Aurelius]] * [[Marcus Manilius|Manilius]] * [[Martial]] * [[Nicolaus of Damascus|Nicolaus Damascenus]] * [[Nonius Marcellus]] * [[Julius Obsequens|Obsequens]] * [[Orosius]] * [[Ovid]] * [[Petronius]] * [[Phaedrus (fabulist)|Phaedrus]] * [[Plautus]] * [[Pliny the Elder]] * [[Pliny the Younger]] * [[Pomponius Mela]] * [[Priscian]] * [[Propertius]] * [[Quintus Claudius Quadrigarius|Quadrigarius]] * [[Quintilian]] * [[Quintus Curtius Rufus]] * [[Sallust]] * [[Seneca the Elder]] * [[Seneca the Younger]] * [[Maurus Servius Honoratus|Servius]] * [[Sidonius Apollinaris]] * [[Silius Italicus]] * [[Statius]] * [[Suetonius]] * [[Quintus Aurelius Symmachus|Symmachus]] * [[Tacitus]] * [[Terence]] * [[Tertullian]] * [[Tibullus]] * [[Valerius Antias]] * [[Valerius Maximus]] * [[Marcus Terentius Varro|Varro]] * [[Velleius Paterculus]] * [[Verrius Flaccus]] * [[Virgil|Vergil]] * [[Vitruvius]] | group2 = Greek | list2 = * [[Claudius Aelianus|Aelian]] * [[Aëtius of Amida]] * [[Appian]] * [[Arrian]] * [[Cassius Dio]] * [[Diodorus Siculus]] * [[Diogenes Laërtius]] * [[Dionysius of Halicarnassus]] * [[Pedanius Dioscorides|Dioscorides]] * [[Eusebius of Caesaria]] * [[Galen]] * [[Herodian]] * [[Josephus]] * [[Julian (emperor)|Julian]] * [[Libanius]] * [[Lucian]] * [[Pausanias (geographer)|Pausanias]] * [[Philostratus]] * [[Phlegon of Tralles]] * [[Photios I of Constantinople|Photius]] * [[Plutarch]] * [[Polyaenus]] * [[Polybius]] * [[Porphyry (philosopher)|Porphyrius]] * [[Priscus]] * [[Procopius]] * [[Simplicius of Cilicia]] * [[Sozomen]] * [[Stephanus of Byzantium|Stephanus Byzantinus]] * [[Strabo]] * [[Themistius]] * [[Theodoret]] * [[Zonaras]] * [[Zosimus]] }} | group16 = Major cities | list16 = * [[Alexandria]] * [[Antioch]] * [[Aquileia]] * [[Berytus]] * [[Bologna|Bononia]] * [[Carthage]] * [[Constantinople|Constantinopolis]] * [[Eboracum]] * [[Leptis Magna]] * [[Londinium]] * [[Lugdunum]] * [[Lutetia]] * [[Mediolanum]] * [[Pompeii]] * [[Ravenna]] * [[Rome|Roma]] * [[Smyrna]] * [[Vindobona]] * [[Volubilis]] | group17 = Lists {{nobold|and other
topics}} | list17 = * [[List of cities founded by the Romans|Cities and towns]] * [[Climate of ancient Rome|Climate]] * [[List of Roman consuls|Consuls]] * [[List of Roman dictators|Dictators]] * [[List of Roman women|Distinguished women]] * [[List of Roman dynasties|Dynasties]] * [[List of Roman emperors|Emperors]] * [[List of Roman generals|Generals]] * [[List of Roman gentes|Gentes]] * [[List of Graeco-Roman geographers|Geographers]] * [[Political institutions of ancient Rome|Institutions]] * [[List of Roman laws|Laws]] * [[Legacy of the Roman Empire|Legacy]] * [[List of Roman legions|Legions]] * [[List of Roman dictators|Magistri equitum]] * [[List of Roman nomina|Nomina]] * [[List of Pontifices Maximi|Pontifices Maximi]] * [[List of Roman praetors|Praetors]] * [[List of Roman quaestors|Quaestors]] * [[List of Roman tribunes|Tribunes]] * [[Roman–Iranian relations]] * [[List of Roman wars and battles|Wars and battles]] ** [[List of Roman civil wars and revolts|Civil wars and revolts]] * [[Fiction set in ancient Rome|Fiction]] * [[List of films set in ancient Rome|Films]] }} {{collapsible option |statename=optional |default=collapsed}} [[Category:Ancient Rome templates| ]] [[Category:Country and territory topics templates]] Pages transcluded onto the current version of this page (help): Template:Big (view source) (template editor protected) Template:Collapsible option (view source) (template editor protected) Template:Navbox (view source) (template editor protected) Template:Nobold (view source) (template editor protected) Template:Nobold/styles.css (view source) (template editor protected) Template:Para (view source) (template editor protected) Template:Pp-template (view source) (template editor protected) Template:Template link expanded (view source) (protected) Template:Template other (view source) (protected) Template:Tlx (view source) (protected) Module:Arguments (view source) (protected) Module:Color contrast (view source) (template editor protected) Module:Color contrast/colors (view source) (template editor protected) Module:Effective protection expiry (view source) (template editor protected) Module:Effective protection level (view source) (protected) Module:File link (view source) (template editor protected) Module:Navbar (view source) (protected) Module:Navbar/configuration (view source) (protected) Module:Navbar/styles.css (view source) (protected) Module:Navbox (view source) (template editor protected) Module:No globals (view source) (protected) Module:Protection banner (view source) (template editor protected) Module:Protection banner/config (view source) (template editor protected) Module:Template link general (view source) (protected) Module:Yesno (view source) (protected) Return to Template:Ancient Rome topics. Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Ancient_Rome_topics" Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Template Talk Variants Views Read View source View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Page information Wikidata item Languages Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1899 ---- Overthrow of the Roman monarchy - Wikipedia Overthrow of the Roman monarchy From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Political revolution (traditionally 509 BC) which expelled the last king of Rome and established the Roman Republic Overthrow of L. Tarquinius Superbus A 16th-century painting by Sandro Botticelli, depicting the rape of Lucretia and the subsequent uprising. Date 510–509 BC Location Rome Result Decisive revolutionary victory Expulsion of L. Tarquinius Superbus End of the Roman Kingdom Establishment of the Roman Republic Belligerents L. Junius Brutus Patricians Plebeians L. Tarquinius Superbus The overthrow of the Roman monarchy, a political revolution in ancient Rome, took place around 509 BC and resulted in the expulsion of the last king of Rome, Lucius Tarquinius Superbus, and the establishment of the Roman Republic. The semi-legendary Roman histories[1] tell that while the king was away on campaign, his son Sextus Tarquinius raped a noblewoman, Lucretia. Afterwards she revealed the offence to various Roman noblemen, and then committed suicide. The Roman noblemen, led by Lucius Junius Brutus, obtained the support of the Roman aristocracy and the people to expel the king and his family and to institute a republic. The Roman army supported Brutus, and the king went into exile. Despite a number of attempts by Lucius Tarquinius Superbus to reinstate the monarchy, the citizens established a republic and thereafter elected two consuls annually to rule the city. Contents 1 Background: The Kingdom 2 Rape of Lucretia 3 Uprising 4 Establishment of the republic 5 Attempts to reinstate the monarchy 6 References Background: The Kingdom[edit] Main articles: Roman Kingdom, King of Rome, and Lucius Tarquinius Superbus Roman history held that seven kings of Rome reigned from the establishment of the city in 753 BC by Romulus up to the reign of Tarquinius. The accuracy of this account has been doubted by modern historians, although it appears to be accepted that there was a monarchy, and the last king Tarquinius was expelled upon the founding of the republic in the late 6th century BC. Tarquinius was the son of the fifth king, Lucius Tarquinius Priscus. In around 535 BC Tarquinius, together with his wife Tullia Minor (one of the daughters of the then king Servius Tullius) arranged the murder of Servius. Tarquinius became king in his place. Despite various military victories, Tarquinius became an unpopular king. He refused to bury his predecessor, then put to death a number of the leading senators whom he suspected of remaining loyal to Servius (one of whom was the brother of Lucius Junius Brutus). By not replacing the slain senators, and not consulting the Senate on all matters of government, he diminished both the size and authority of the Senate. In another break with tradition, he judged capital criminal cases without advice of counsellors, thereby creating fear among those who might think to oppose him. He also engaged in treachery with the Latin allies. Rape of Lucretia[edit] Titian's Tarquin and Lucretia (1571) Main article: Lucretia In about 510 BC, Tarquinius went to war with the Rutuli. According to Livy, the Rutuli were, at that time, a very wealthy people and Tarquinius was keen to obtain the spoils that would come with victory over the Rutuli in order, in part, to assuage the anger of his subjects.[2] Tarquinius unsuccessfully sought to take the Rutulian capital Ardea by storm, and subsequently began an extensive siege of the city.[2] Sextus Tarquinius, the king's son, was sent on a military errand to Collatia. Sextus was received with great hospitality at the governor's mansion, home of Lucius Tarquinius Collatinus, son of the king's nephew, Arruns Tarquinius, former governor of Collatia and first of the Tarquinii Collatini. Lucius' wife, Lucretia, daughter of Spurius Lucretius, prefect of Rome, "a man of distinction",[3] made sure that the king's son was treated as became his rank, although her husband was away at the siege. In a variant of the story,[4] Sextus and Lucius, at a wine party on furlough, were debating the virtues of wives when Lucius volunteered to settle the debate by all of them riding to his home to see what Lucretia was doing. She was weaving with her maids. The party awarded her the palm of victory and Lucius invited them to visit, but for the time being they returned to camp. At night Sextus entered her bedroom by stealth, quietly going around the slaves who were sleeping at her door. She awakened, he identified himself and offered her two choices: she could submit to his sexual advances and become his wife and future queen, or he would kill her and one of her slaves and place the bodies together, then claim he had caught her having adulterous sex (see sexuality in ancient Rome). In the alternative story, he returned from camp a few days later with one companion to take Collatinus up on his invitation to visit and was lodged in a guest bedroom. He entered Lucretia's room while she lay naked in her bed and started to wash her belly with water, which woke her up. Uprising[edit] Brutus holding the knife and swearing the oath, with Lucretia The next day Lucretia dressed in black and went to her father's house in Rome and cast herself down in the suppliant's position (embracing the knees), weeping. Asked to explain herself she insisted on first summoning witnesses and after disclosing the rape, called on them for vengeance, a plea that could not be ignored, as she was speaking to the chief magistrate of Rome. While they were debating she drew a concealed dagger and stabbed herself in the heart. She died in her father's arms, with the women present keening and lamenting. "This dreadful scene struck the Romans who were present with so much horror and compassion that they all cried out with one voice that they would rather die a thousand deaths in defence of their liberty than suffer such outrages to be committed by the tyrants."[5] In the alternative version, Lucretia summoned Lucius Junius Brutus (a leading citizen, and the grandson of Rome's fifth king Tarquinius Priscus), along with her father Spurius Lucretius Tricipitinus, another leading citizen Publius Valerius Publicola, and her husband Lucius Tarquinius Collatinus (also related to Tarquinius Priscus) to Collatia after she had been raped. Lucretia, believing that the rape dishonored her and her family, committed suicide by stabbing herself with a dagger after telling of what had befallen her. According to legend, Brutus grabbed the dagger from Lucretia's breast after her death and immediately shouted for the overthrow of the Tarquins.[6] The four men gathered the youth of Collatia, then went to Rome where Brutus, being at that time Tribunus Celerum, summoned the people to the forum and exhorted them to rise up against the king. The people voted for the deposition of the king, and the banishment of the royal family.[7] Brutus summoned the comitia curiata, an organization of patrician families used mainly to ratify the decrees of the king and began to harangue them in one of the more noted and effective speeches of ancient Rome. He began by revealing that his pose as fool was a sham designed to protect him against an evil king. He leveled a number of charges against the king and his family: the outrage against Lucretia, whom everyone could see on the dais, the king's tyranny, the forced labor of the plebeians in the ditches and sewers of Rome. He pointed out that Superbus had come to rule by the murder of Servius Tullius, his wife's father, next-to-the-last king of Rome. He "solemnly invoked the gods as the avengers of murdered parents." The king's wife, Tullia, was in fact in Rome and probably was a witness to the proceedings from her palace near the forum. Seeing herself the target of so much animosity she fled from the palace in fear of her life and proceeded to the camp at Ardea.[7] Brutus opened a debate on the form of government Rome ought to have; there were many speakers (all patricians). In summation he proposed the banishment of the Tarquins from all the territories of Rome and appointment of an interrex to nominate new magistrates and conduct an election of ratification. They had decided on a republican form of government with two consuls in place of a king executing the will of a patrician senate. This was a temporary measure until they could consider the details more carefully. Brutus renounced all right to the throne. In subsequent years the powers of the king were divided among various elected magistracies. A final vote of the curiae carried the interim constitution. Spurius Lucretius was swiftly elected interrex (he was prefect of the city anyway). He proposed Brutus and Collatinus as the first two consuls and that choice was ratified by the curiae. Needing to acquire the assent of the population as a whole they paraded Lucretia's body through the streets, summoning the plebeians to legal assembly in the forum. Once there they heard a further speech by Brutus. It began:[8] Inasmuch as Tarquinius neither obtained the sovereignty in accordance with our ancestral customs and laws, nor, since he obtained it — in whatever manner he got it — has he been exercising it in an honourable or kingly manner, but has surpassed in insolence and lawlessness all the tyrants the world ever saw, we patricians met together and resolved to deprive him of his power, a thing we ought to have done long ago, but are doing now when a favourable opportunity has offered. And we have called you together, plebeians, in order to declare our own decision and then ask for your assistance in achieving liberty for our country.... A general election was held. The vote was for the republic. The monarchy was at an end, even while Lucretia was still displayed in the forum. Brutus, leaving Lucretius in command of the city, proceeded with armed men to the Roman army then camped at Ardea. The king, who had been with the army, heard of developments at Rome, and left the camp for the city before Brutus' arrival. The army received Brutus as a hero, and the king's sons were expelled from the camp. Tarquinius Superbus, meanwhile, was refused entry at Rome, and fled with his family into exile.[9] Establishment of the republic[edit] The Capitoline Brutus, an ancient Roman bust from the Capitoline Museums is traditionally identified as a portrait of Lucius Junius Brutus That uprising resulted in the exile or Regifugium, after a reign of 25 years, of Tarquinius and his family, and the establishment of the Roman Republic, with Brutus and Collatinus (both related by blood to Rome's fifth king Lucius Tarquinius Priscus) as the first consuls.[10] Tarquinius and his two eldest sons, Titus and Arruns, went into exile at Caere.[11] According to Livy, Brutus' first act after the expulsion of Lucius Tarquinius Superbus was to bring the people to swear an oath (the Oath of Brutus) never to allow any man again to be king in Rome.[12] Omnium primum avidum novae libertatis populum, ne postmodum flecti precibus aut donis regiis posset, iure iurando adegit neminem Romae passuros regnare. First of all, by swearing an oath that they would suffer no man to rule Rome, it forced the people, desirous of a new liberty, not to be thereafter swayed by the entreaties or bribes of kings. This is, fundamentally, a restatement of the "private oath" sworn by the conspirators to overthrow the monarchy:[13] Per hunc... castissimum ante regiam iniuriam sanguinem iuro, vosque, di, testes facio me L. Tarquinium Superbum cum scelerata coniuge et omni liberorum stirpe ferro igni quacumque dehinc vi possim exsecuturum, nec illos nec alium quemquam regnare Romae passurum. By this guiltless blood before the kingly injustice I swear – you and the gods as my witnesses – I make myself the one who will prosecute, by what force I am able, Lucius Tarquinius Superbus along with his wicked wife and the whole house of his freeborn children by sword, by fire, by any means hence, so that neither they nor any one else be suffered to rule Rome. There is no scholarly agreement that the oath took place; it is reported, although differently, by Plutarch (Poplicola, 2) and Appian (B.C. 2.119). Brutus also replenished the number of senators to 300 from the principal men of the equites. The new consuls also created a new office of rex sacrorum to carry out the religious duties that had previously been performed by the kings.[14] Because of the Roman people's revulsion at the name and family of the exiled king, the consul Tarquinius Collatinus was forced to resign from the office of consul and go into exile.[14] Attempts to reinstate the monarchy[edit] After his exile, Tarquinius made a number of attempts to regain the throne. At first, he sent ambassadors to the Senate to request the return of his family's personal effects, which had been seized in the coup. In secret, while the Senate debated his request, the ambassadors met with and subverted a number of the leading men of Rome to the royal cause, in the Tarquinian conspiracy. The conspirators included two of Brutus' brothers-in-law, and his two sons Titus and Tiberius. The conspiracy was discovered, and the conspirators executed.[15] Although the Senate had initially agreed to Tarquin's request for a return of his family's effects, the decision was reconsidered and revoked after the discovery of the conspiracy, and the royal property was given over to be plundered by the Roman populace.[16] Tarquinius next attempted to regain Rome by force of arms. He first gained the support of the cities of Veii and Tarquinii, recalling to the former their regular losses of war and land to the Roman state, and to the latter his family ties. The armies of the two cities were led by Tarquinius against Rome in the Battle of Silva Arsia. The king commanded the Etruscan infantry. Although the result initially appeared uncertain, the Romans were victorious. Both Brutus (the consul) and Arruns (the king's son) were killed in battle.[17] Another attempt by Tarquinius relied on military support from Lars Porsenna, king of Clusium. The war led to the siege of Rome, and finally a peace treaty. However, Tarquinius failed to achieve his aim of regaining the throne.[18][19] Tarquinius and his family left Clusium, and instead sought refuge in Tusculum with his son-in-law Octavius Mamilius.[20] In about 496 BC, Tarquin and his son Titus fought with Mamilius and the Latin League against Rome, but lost, at the Battle of Lake Regillus at which Mamilius perished. Subsequently, Tarquinius fled to take refuge with the tyrant of Cumae, Aristodemus and Tarquin died there in 495 BC.[21] References[edit] ^ Gates, Charles (2013) [2003]. "19: Rome from its origins to the end of the Republic". Ancient Cities: The Archaeology of Urban Life in the Ancient Near East and Egypt, Greece and Rome. London: Routledge. p. 318. ISBN 9781134676620. Retrieved 2018-01-17. The early history of Rome, such as it can be reconstructed from the legends recounted notably by Livy, a historian of the Augustan period, divides into two periods, the first under the rule of four Latin kings (ca. 753–600 BC), the second under the rule of three Etruscan kings (ca. 600—509 BC). ^ a b Livy, Ab urbe condita, 1.57 ^ D.H. IV.64. ^ T.L. I.57. ^ D.H. IV.66. ^ Livy, Ab urbe condita, 1.58–59 ^ a b Livy, Ab urbe condita, 1.59 ^ D.H. IV.78. ^ Livy, Ab urbe condita, 1.59–60 ^ Gale, Robert L. (1995). A Herman Melville encyclopedia. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 504. ISBN 978-0-313-29011-4. ^ Livy, Ab urbe condita, 1.60 ^ Livy, Ab urbe condita, ed. R. S. Conway & C. F. Walters (Oxford, 1914), 2.1.9. ^ Livy, "Ab urbe condita" 1.59.1. ^ a b Livy, Ab urbe condita, 2.1–2 ^ Livy, Ab urbe condita, 2.3–5 ^ Livy, Ab urbe condita, 2.5 ^ Livy, Ab urbe condita, 2.6–7 ^ Cornell, Tim (1995). The Beginnings of Rome. Routledge. pp. 215–17. ISBN 978-0-415-01596-7. Retrieved 2009-04-22. ^ Livy, Ab urbe condita, 2.9–15 ^ Livy, Ab urbe condita, 2.15 ^ Livy, Ab urbe condita, 2.21 v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Overthrow_of_the_Roman_monarchy&oldid=995609200" Categories: 509 BC 6th-century BC conflicts 6th century BC in the Roman Kingdom Rebellions in ancient history Democratization Coups d'état Revolutions Hidden categories: Articles with short description Articles with long short description Short description matches Wikidata Articles containing Latin-language text Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages فارسی Lingua Franca Nova Português Русский Türkçe Українська Edit links This page was last edited on 21 December 2020, at 23:51 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1909 ---- Tribune - Wikipedia Tribune From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Elected Roman officials For other uses, see Tribune (disambiguation). Not to be confused with Tribute. Ancient Rome This article is part of a series on the politics and government of ancient Rome Periods Roman Kingdom 753–509 BC Roman Republic 509–27 BC Roman Empire 27 BC – AD 395 Principate 27 BC – AD 284 Dominate AD 284–641 Western AD 395–476 Eastern AD 395–1453 Timeline Roman Constitution Constitution of the Kingdom Constitution of the Republic Constitution of the Empire Constitution of the Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Executive magistrates Precedent and law Roman law Ius Imperium Mos maiorum Collegiality Auctoritas Roman citizenship Cursus honorum Senatus consultum Senatus consultum ultimum Assemblies Centuriate Curiate Plebeian Tribal Ordinary magistrates Consul Praetor Quaestor Promagistrate Aedile Tribune Censor Governor Extraordinary magistrates Corrector Dictator Magister equitum Consular tribune Rex Triumviri Decemviri Titles and honours Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Praeses Praefectus Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Other countries v t e This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Tribune" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (March 2019) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) Tribune (Latin: Tribunus) was the title of various elected officials in ancient Rome. The two most important were the tribunes of the plebs and the military tribunes. For most of Roman history, a college of ten tribunes of the plebs acted as a check on the authority of the senate and the annual magistrates, holding the power of ius intercessionis to intervene on behalf of the plebeians, and veto unfavourable legislation. There were also military tribunes, who commanded portions of the Roman army, subordinate to higher magistrates, such as the consuls and praetors, promagistrates, and their legates. Various officers within the Roman army were also known as tribunes. The title was also used for several other positions and classes in the course of Roman history. Contents 1 Tribal Tribunes 2 Tribune of the Celeres 3 Tribune of the Plebs 4 Military Tribunes 5 Consular Tribunes 6 Tribunes of the treasury 7 Later uses of the title 7.1 Republic of Venice 7.2 French revolutionary tribunat 8 See also 9 References 9.1 Notes 9.2 Bibliography 10 External links Tribal Tribunes[edit] The word tribune is derived from the Roman tribes. The three original tribes known as the Ramnes or Ramnenses, Tities or Titienses, and the Luceres, were each headed by a tribune, who represented each tribe in civil, religious, and military matters.[1]:ii. 7[2][3] Subsequently, each of the Servian tribes was also represented by a tribune.[1]:ii. 14[4] Tribune of the Celeres[edit] Under the Roman Kingdom, the Tribunus Celerum, in English Tribune of the Celeres, or Tribune of the Knights, was commander of the king's personal bodyguard, known as the Celeres. This official was second only to the king, and had the authority to pass law, known as lex tribunicia, and to preside over the comitia curiata. Unless the king himself elected to lead the cavalry into battle, this responsibility fell to the tribune of the celeres. In theory he could deprive the king of his imperium, or authority to command, with the agreement of the comitia curiata.[1]:ii. 13[4] In the reign of Lucius Tarquinius Superbus, the last Roman king, this office was held by Lucius Junius Brutus, the king's nephew, and thus the senior member of the king's household, after the king himself and his sons. It was Brutus who convened the comitia and asked that they revoke the king's imperium.[5]:i. 59 After the fall of the monarchy, the powers of the tribune of the celeres were divided between the Magister Militum, or Master of the Infantry, also known as the Praetor Maximus or dictator, and his lieutenant, the magister equitum or "Master of the Horse". Tribune of the Plebs[edit] Main article: Tribune of the Plebs The Tribuni Plebis, known in English as Tribunes of the Plebs, Tribunes of the People, or Plebeian Tribunes, were instituted in 494 BC, after the first secession of the plebs, in order to protect the interests of the plebeians against the actions of the senate and the annual magistrates, who were uniformly patrician. The ancient sources indicate the tribunes may have originally been two or five in number. If the former, the college of tribunes was expanded to five in 470 BC. Either way, the college was increased to ten in 457 BC, and remained at this number throughout Roman history. They were assisted by two aediles plebis, or plebeian aediles. Only plebeians were eligible for these offices, although there were at least two exceptions.[6] The tribunes of the plebs had the power to convene the concilium plebis, or plebeian assembly, and propose legislation before it. Only one of the tribunes could preside over this assembly, which had the power to pass laws affecting only the plebeians, known as plebiscita, or plebiscites. After 287 BC, the decrees of the concilium plebis had the effect of law over all Roman citizens. By the 3rd century BC, the tribunes could also convene and propose legislation before the senate.[7] Although sometimes referred to as "plebeian magistrates," technically the tribunes of the plebs were not magistrates, having been elected by the plebeians alone, and not the whole Roman people. However, they were sacrosanct, and the whole body of the plebeians were pledged to protect the tribunes against any assault or interference with their persons during their terms of office. Anyone who violated the sacrosanctity of the tribunes might be killed without penalty.[7][8] This was also the source of the tribunes' power, known as ius intercessionis, or intercessio, by which any tribune could intercede on behalf of a Roman citizen to prohibit the act of a magistrate or other official. Citizens could appeal the decisions of the magistrates to the tribunes, who would then be obliged to determine the legality of the action before a magistrate could proceed. This power also allowed the tribunes to forbid, or veto any act of the senate or another assembly. Only a dictator was exempt from these powers.[7] The tribunicia potestas, or tribunician power, was limited by the fact that it was derived from the oath of the people to defend the tribunes. This limited most of the tribunes' actions to the boundaries of the city itself, as well as a radius of one mile around. They had no power to affect the actions of provincial governors.[7] The powers of the tribunes were severely curtailed during the constitutional reforms of the dictator Sulla in 81 BC. Although many of these powers were restored in further reforms of 75 BC and 70 BC, the prestige and authority of the tribunes had been irreparably damaged. In 48 BC, the senate granted tribunician powers (tribunicia potestas, powers equivalent to those of a tribune without actually being one) to the dictator Julius Caesar. Caesar used them to prevent the other tribunes interfering with his actions. In 23 BC, the senate granted the same power to Augustus, the first Roman Emperor, and from that point onwards it was regularly granted to each emperor as part of their formal titles. Under the Roman Empire, the tribunes continued to be elected, but had lost their independence and most of their practical power. The office became merely a step in the political careers of plebeians who aspired toward a seat in the senate.[7] Military Tribunes[edit] Main article: Military tribune The Tribuni Militum, known in English as Military Tribunes or literally, Tribunes of the Soldiers, were elected each year along with the annual magistrates. Their number varied throughout Roman history, but eventually reached twenty-four. These were usually young men in their late twenties, who aspired to a senatorial career. Each tribune would be assigned to command a portion of the Roman army, subordinate to the magistrates and promagistrates appointed by the senate, and their legates. Within each of the legions, various middle-ranking officers were also styled tribune. These officers included: Tribunus laticlavius, a senatorial officer, second in command of a legion; identified by a broad stripe, or laticlavus. Tribunus angusticlavius, an officer chosen from among the equites, five to each legion; identified by a narrow stripe, or angusticlavus. Tribunus rufulus, an officer chosen by the commander. Tribunus vacans, an unassigned officer in the Late Roman army; a member of the general's staff. Tribunus cohortis, an officer commanding a cohort, part of a legion usually consisting of six centuries. Tribunus cohortis urbanae, commander of one of the urban cohorts, a sort of military police unit stationed at Rome. Tribunus sexmestris, a tribune serving a tour of duty of only six months; there is no evidence to identify this officer as a cavalry commander, as sometimes stated in modern literature. In the late Roman army, a tribunus was a senior officer, sometimes called a comes, who commanded a cavalry vexillatio. As tribounos, the title survived in the East Roman army until the early 7th century. From the use of tribunus to describe various military officers is derived the word tribunal, originally referring to a raised platform used to address the soldiers or administer justice. Military tribunes are featured in notable works of historical fiction, including Ben-Hur: A Tale of the Christ, by Lew Wallace, and The Robe by Lloyd C. Douglas. Both novels involve characters affected by the life and death of Jesus, and were turned into epic films during the 1950s. Messala, the primary antagonist in Ben-Hur, was played by Stephen Boyd, while Marcellus Gallio, the protagonist of The Robe, was played by a young Richard Burton. Consular Tribunes[edit] Main article: Tribuni militum consulari potestate In 445 BC, the tribunes of the plebs succeeded in passing the lex Canuleia, repealing the law forbidding the intermarriage of patricians and plebeians, and providing that one of the consuls might be a plebeian. Rather than permit the consular dignity to pass into the hands of a plebeian, the senate proposed a compromise whereby three military tribunes, who might be either patrician or plebeian, should be elected in place of the consuls. The first tribuni militum consulare potestate, or military tribunes with consular power, were elected for the year 444. Although plebeians were eligible for this office, each of the first "consular tribunes" was a patrician.[5]:iv. 1–6 Military tribunes were elected in place of the consuls in half the years from 444 to 401 BC, and in each instance, all of the tribunes were patricians; nor did any plebeian succeed in obtaining the consulship. The number of tribunes increased to four beginning in 426, and six beginning in 405. At last, the plebeians elected four of their number military tribunes for the year 400; others were elected in 399, 396, 383, and 379. But apart from these years, no plebeian obtained the highest offices of the Roman State. The patricians' monopoly on power was finally broken by Gaius Licinius Calvus Stolo and Lucius Sextius Lateranus, tribunes of the people, who in 376 BC brought forward legislation demanding not merely that one of the consuls might be a plebeian, but that henceforth one must be chosen from their order. When the senate refused their demand, the tribunes prevented the election of annual magistrates for five years, before relenting and permitting the election of consular tribunes from 370 to 367. In the end, and with the encouragement of the dictator Marcus Furius Camillus, the senate conceded the battle, and passed the Licinian Rogations. Sextius was elected the first plebeian consul, followed by Licinius two years later; and with this settlement, the consular tribunes were abolished.[1]:xiv. 12[5]:vi. 35, 36, 38, 42, vii. 1, 2[9] Tribunes of the treasury[edit] The exact nature of the Tribuni Aerarii, or Tribunes of the Treasury is shrouded in mystery. Originally they seem to have been tax collectors, but this power was slowly lost to other officials. By the end of the Republic, this style belonged to a class of persons slightly below the equites in wealth. When the makeup of Roman juries was reformed in 70 BC, it was stipulated that one-third of the members of each jury should belong to this class. Later uses of the title[edit] Republic of Venice[edit] In the early history of the Republic of Venice, during the tenure of the sixth Doge Domenico Monegario, Venice instituted a dual Tribunal modeled on the above Roman institution - two new Tribunes being elected each year, with the intention to oversee the Doge and prevent abuse of power (though this aim was not always successfully achieved). French revolutionary tribunat[edit] Main article: Tribunat The "Tribunat", the French word for tribunate, derived from the Latin term tribunatus, meaning the office or term of a Roman tribunus (see above), was a collective organ of the young revolutionary French Republic composed of members styled tribun (the French for tribune), which, despite the apparent reference to one of ancient Rome's prestigious magistratures, never held any real political power as an assembly, its individual members no role at all. It was instituted by Napoleon I Bonaparte's Constitution of the Year VIII "in order to moderate the other powers" by discussing every legislative project, sending its orateurs ("orators", i.e. spokesmen) to defend or attack them in the Corps législatif, and asking the Senate to overturn "the lists of eligibles, the acts of the Legislative Body and those of the government" on account of unconstitutionality. Its 100 members were designated by the Senate from the list of citizens from 25 years up, and annually one fifth was renewed for a five-year term. When it opposed the first parts of Bonaparte's proposed penal code, he made the Senate nominate 20 new members at once to replace the 20 first opponents to his politic; they accepted the historically important reform of penal law. As the Tribunate opposed new despotic projects, he got the Senate in year X to allow itself to dissolve the Tribunate. In XIII it was further downsized to 50 members. On August 16, 1807 it was abolished and never revived. See also[edit] Constitution of the Roman Republic List of Roman tribunes References[edit] Notes[edit] ^ a b c d Dionysius of Halicarnassus. Romaike Archaiologia. ^ Digesta seu Pandectae. i. tit. 2 s2 § 20. ^ Servius. ad Virg. Aen. 560. ^ a b Smith, William (ed.). Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities. ^ a b c Titus Livius. Ab Urbe Condita. ^ Livy, Ab urbe condita, ii. 33, 58 (citing Piso, iii. 31) ^ a b c d e "Tribuni Plebis". Oxford Classical Dictionary (2nd ed.). 1970. ^ Abbott, Frank Frost (1901). A History and Description of Roman Political Institutions. Ginn & Co. pp. 196, 261. ^ Plutarchus. "Life of Camillus". Lives of the Noble Greeks and Romans. Bibliography[edit] Nouveau Larousse illustré (in French). Mackay, Christopher S. Ancient Rome: A Military and Political History. p. 135. for information on Tribunes of the Treasury External links[edit] Livius.org: Tribune v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tribune&oldid=988311458" Categories: Ancient Roman titles Hidden categories: CS1: long volume value Articles with short description Short description matches Wikidata Articles needing additional references from March 2019 All articles needing additional references Articles containing Latin-language text CS1 French-language sources (fr) Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages العربية Беларуская Català Čeština Dansk Eesti Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی 한국어 Hrvatski Bahasa Indonesia Italiano עברית ქართული Lietuvių Bahasa Melayu Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Norsk nynorsk Português Română Русский Slovenščina Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Türkçe Українська 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 12 November 2020, at 11:53 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1916 ---- View source for Horace - Wikipedia View source for Horace ← Horace Jump to navigation Jump to search You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons: Your IP address is in a range that has been blocked on all Wikimedia Foundation wikis. The block was made by Jon Kolbert (meta.wikimedia.org). The reason given is Open Proxy: Webhost: Contact stewards if you are affected . Start of block: 20:12, 23 July 2019 Expiry of block: 20:12, 23 January 2022 Your current IP address is 40.76.139.33 and the blocked range is 40.76.0.0/16. Please include all above details in any queries you make. If you believe you were blocked by mistake, you can find additional information and instructions in the No open proxies global policy. Otherwise, to discuss the block please post a request for review on Meta-Wiki or send an email to the stewards OTRS queue at stewards@wikimedia.org including all above details. You are currently unable to edit Wikipedia due to a block affecting your IP address. This does not affect your ability to read Wikipedia pages. Most people who see this message have done nothing wrong. Some kinds of blocks restrict editing from specific service providers or telecom companies in response to recent abuse or vandalism, and affect other users who are unrelated to that abuse. See below if you do not believe you have done anything wrong. Editing from 40.76.0.0/16 has been blocked (disabled) by ‪SQL‬ for the following reason(s): The IP address that you are currently using has been blocked because it is believed to be a web host provider or colocation provider. To prevent abuse, web hosts and colocation providers may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You will not be able to edit Wikipedia using a web host or colocation provider because it hides your IP address, much like a proxy or VPN. We recommend that you attempt to use another connection to edit. For example, if you use a proxy or VPN to connect to the internet, turn it off when editing Wikipedia. If you edit using a mobile connection, try using a Wi-Fi connection, and vice versa. If you have a Wikipedia account, please log in. If you do not have any other way to edit Wikipedia, you will need to request an IP block exemption. If you are confident that you are not using a web host, you may appeal this block by adding the following text on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is _______. Place any further information here. ~~~~}}. You must fill in the blank with your IP address for this block to be investigated. Your IP address can be determined here. Alternatively, if you wish to keep your IP address private you can use the unblock ticket request system. There are several reasons you might be editing using the IP address of a web host or colocation provider (such as if you are using VPN software or a business network); please use this method of appeal only if you think your IP address is in fact not a web host or colocation provider. Administrators: The IP block exemption user right should only be applied to allow users to edit using web host in exceptional circumstances, and requests should usually be directed to the functionaries team via email. If you intend to give the IPBE user right, a CheckUser needs to take a look at the account. This can be requested most easily at SPI Quick Checkuser Requests. Unblocking an IP or IP range with this template is highly discouraged without at least contacting the blocking administrator. This block has been set to expire: 16:25, 2 June 2023. Even when blocked, you will usually still be able to edit your user talk page and email other editors and administrators. For information on how to proceed, first see the FAQ for blocked users and the guideline on block appeals. The guide to appealing blocks may also be helpful. Other useful links: Blocking policy · Help:I have been blocked You can view and copy the source of this page: ==External links== {{sisterlinks|d=Q6197|s=Author:Horace|c=Category:Quintus Horatius Flaccus|v=no|voy=no|m=no|mw=no|species=no|b=no|n=no}} {{Library resources box |by=yes |onlinebooks=yes |others=yes |about=yes |label=Horace |viaf= |lccn= |lcheading= |wikititle= }} * {{Gutenberg author |id=1790 | name=Horace}} * {{Internet Archive author}} * {{Librivox author |id=3050}} * Q. Horati Flacci ''[https://archive.org/details/qhoratiflacciop00flacgoog opera]'', recensuerunt O. Keller et A. Holder, 2 voll., Lipsiae in aedibus B. G. Teubneri, 1864–9. * [http://latin.topword.net/?Horace Common sayings from Horace] * [http://www.thelatinlibrary.com/hor.html The works of Horace] at [[The Latin Library]] * [http://www.stilus.nl/horatius/index-latine.htm Carmina Horatiana] All ''Carmina'' of Horace in Latin recited by Thomas Bervoets. * [http://www.poetseers.org/the_great_poets/the_classics/horace/ Selected Poems of Horace] * [http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/searchresults?q=Horatius&redirect=true Works by Horace at Perseus Digital Library] * [http://www.stoa.org/diotima/anthology/horawillbio.shtml Biography and chronology] * [http://www.intratext.com/Catalogo/Autori/Aut186.HTM Horace's works]: text, concordances and frequency list * [http://www.rhapsodes.fll.vt.edu/horace_ode_1.htm SORGLL: Horace, ''Odes'' I.22, read by Robert Sonkowsky] * [http://toutcoule.blogspot.com/search/label/horace Translations of several odes in the original meters (with accompaniment).] * [http://www.thethepoetry.com/2011/02/some-notes-on-translations-of-horace/ A discussion and comparison of three different contemporary translations of Horace's ''Odes''] * [http://www.virgilmurder.org/images/pdf/arsengl.pdf Some spurious lines in the ''Ars Poetica''?] * [http://www.horatius.net Horati opera, Acronis et Porphyrionis commentarii, varia lectio etc. (latine)] * [http://openn.library.upenn.edu/Data/0023/html/horace_ms_1a.html Horace MS 1a Ars Poetica and Epistulae at OPenn] {{Horace|state=expanded}} {{Ancient Rome topics|state=collapsed}} {{Authority control}} [[Category:Horace| ]] [[Category:65 BC births]] [[Category:8 BC deaths]] [[Category:1st-century BC Romans]] [[Category:1st-century BC writers]] [[Category:Ancient Roman soldiers]] [[Category:Golden Age Latin writers]] [[Category:Latin-language writers]] [[Category:People from Venosa]] [[Category:Roman-era poets]] [[Category:Roman-era satirists]] [[Category:Iambic poets]] [[Category:Ancient literary critics]] [[Category:Roman-era Epicurean philosophers]] [[Category:Horatii|Flaccus, Quintus]] [[Category:Roman philhellenes]] Return to Horace. Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horace" Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Page information Wikidata item Languages Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1919 ---- Julius Obsequens - Wikipedia Julius Obsequens From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Late antique Roman writer and collector of prodigies Julius Obsequens was a Roman writer active in the 4th or early 5th centuries AD, during late antiquity. His sole known work is the Prodigiorum liber (Book of Prodigies), a tabulation of the wonders and portents that had occurred in the Roman Republic and early Principate in the years 249–12 BC.[1] The material for the Prodigiorum liber was largely excerpted from the 1st century AD Ab Urbe Condita Libri of the Augustan historian Livy, which chronicled the history of the Roman state from its origin to the beginning of the imperial period, though Julius used it selectively and sometimes added interpretations of the omens and incidents he included.[1] There is a common view that Julius only knew Livy's text wholly or in part from an epitome, but there is scant evidence of this.[1] The work was first printed by the Italian humanist, Aldus Manutius, in 1508, after a manuscript belonging to Jodocus of Verona (now lost). Of great importance was the edition by the Basle humanist Conrad Lycosthenes (1552), trying to reconstruct lost parts and illustrating the text with wood-cuts. Later editions were printed by Johannes Schefferus (Amsterdam, 1679), Franciscus Oudendorp (Leiden, 1720) and Otto Jahn (1853, with the periochae of Livy). The text of Julius Obsequens frequently makes reference to unusual astronomical and meteorological events as portentous signs like meteor showers, comets, and sun dogs, alongside earthquakes, aberrant births, haruspicy, and sweating, crying, or bleeding statues. After the alleged Kenneth Arnold UFO sighting in 1947, Harold T. Wilkins among others, interpreted Julius Obsequens as preserving ancient reports of unidentified flying objects (UFOs).[2] Since Julius wrote some four centuries after the latest of the events he describes, his is not an eye-witness account, and for most of his subject matter his source Livy was himself neither an eye-witness nor even a contemporary. This section's factual accuracy is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on Talk:Julius Obsequens. Please help to ensure that disputed statements are reliably sourced. (June 2011) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) In the consulship of Gaius Marius and L. Valerius Flaccus, (100 BC) for example, Julius writes: At Tarquinii a blazing torch was seen far and wide and fell suddenly dropping. Around the setting of the sun an orb similar to a shield seemed to be borne across [the sky] from the west to the east.[3][4] For the consulship of L. Marcius Philippus and Sextus Julius Caesar, (91 BC) Julius Obsequens reports that: When Livius Drusus, tribune of the people, was passing his laws, and the Italian War began, many prodigies appeared in the city. Around sunrise a ball of fire flashed out of the sky with a mighty sound from the northern regions. At Arretium as they were breaking bread blood flowed from the middle of the loaves. In the territory of the Vestini for seven days it rained stones and potsherds. At Aenaria a flame which came out of a cleft in the earth flashed out to the sky. Around Regium part of the city and the walls were destroyed by an earth tremor. At Spoletum a ball of fire with a golden hue rolled down to earth. It increased in size and after it was seen being carried from the land to the east it covered the sun with its magnitude.[5][6] Finally, Obsequens provided another example of this phenomenon for the consulship of M. Aemilius Lepidus and L. Munatius Plancus (42 BC), stating that: At Rome a mule gave birth by the Twelve Gates. A dead bitch belonging to a temple keeper was dragged away by a dog. Light so shone at night, that it seemed that people woke up for work as though it was daybreak. At Mutina the south facing standard of the Marian victory, of its own accord, turned northward at the fourth hour. When these things were being expiated by sacrificial victims, three suns were seen at around the third hour of the day, then they drew together as one globe.[7][8] References[edit] ^ a b c Pelling, Christopher Brendan Reginald (2012), Hornblower, Simon; Spawforth, Antony; Eidinow, Esther (eds.), "Obsequens (RE 2), Iulius", The Oxford Classical Dictionary (4th ed.), Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acref/9780199545568.001.0001, ISBN 978-0-19-954556-8, retrieved 2020-05-06 ^ Östling, Erik A. W. (2016). "What Does God Need with a Starship? UFOs and Extraterrestrials in the Contemporary Religious Landscape". In Lewis, James R.; Tollefsen, Inga B. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of New Religious Movements. II. Oxford University Press. pp. 417–418. ISBN 978-0-19-046619-0. ^ Julius Obsequens, Prodigiorum liber, XLV. "Fax ardens Tarquiniis late visa subito lapsu cadens. Sub occasu solis orbis clipei similis ab occidente ad orientem visus perferri." ^ "Julius Obsequens, Liber Prodigiorum". alexthenice.com. Retrieved 2020-05-05. ^ Julius Obsequens, Prodigiorum liber, LIV. "Livio Druso tr.pl. leges ferente cum bellum Italicum consurgeret, prodigia multa apparuerunt urbi. Sub ortu solis globus ignis a septemtrionali regione cum ingenti sono caeli emicuit. Arretii frangentibus panes cruor e mediis fluxit. In Vestinis per dies septem lapidibus testisque pluit. Aenariae terrae hiatu flamma exorta in caelum emicuit. Circa Regium terrae motu pars urbis murique diruta. In Spoletino colore aureo globus ignis ad terram devolutus, maiorque factus e terra ad orientem ferri visus magnitudine solem obtexit." ^ "Julius Obsequens, Liber Prodigiorum". alexthenice.com. Retrieved 2020-05-06. ^ Julius Obsequens, Prodigiorum liber, LXX. "Mula Romae ad duodecim portas peperit. Canis aeditui mortua a cane tracta. Lux ita nocte fulsit ut tamquam die orto ad opus surgeretur. In Mutinensi victoriae Marianae signum meridiem spectans sua sponte conversum in septentrionem hora quarta. Cum haec victimis expiarentur, soles tres circiter hora tertia diei visi, mox in unum orbem contracti." ^ "Julius Obsequens, Liber Prodigiorum". alexthenice.com. Retrieved 2020-05-05. Julio Obsecuente, Libro de los Prodigios (restituido a su integridad, en beneficio de la Historia, por Conrado Licóstenes), ed. Ana Moure Casas (Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas, 1990) Giulio Ossequente, Il Libro dei prodigi, ed. Solas Boncompagni (Rome: Edizioni Mediterranee, 1992) Beyer, Jürgen, 'Obsequens, Julius', in Enzyklopädie des Märchens. Handwörterbuch zur historischen und vergleichenden Erzählforschung, vol. 10 (Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter, 2000–02), coll. 176-8 David Engels, Das römische Vorzeichenwesen (753-27 v.Chr.). Quellen, Terminologie, Kommentar, historische Entwicklung (Stuttgart: Franz-Steiner, 2007), p. 221-235. External links[edit] Latin text of Prodigiorum Liber at The Latin Library v t e UFOs Ufology Index of ufology articles Claimed sightings General List of reported UFO sightings Sightings in outer space Pre-20th century Tulli Papyrus (possibly 15th century B.C.) Ezekiel's Wheel (circa 622–570 B.C.) 1561 celestial phenomenon over Nuremberg 1566 celestial phenomenon over Basel José Bonilla observation (1883) Aurora (1897) 20th century Los Angeles (1942) Kenneth Arnold (1947) Roswell (1947) Mantell (1948) Chiles-Whitted (1948) Gorman Dogfight (1948) Mariana (1950) McMinnville photographs (1950) Sperry (1950) Lubbock Lights (1951) Carson Sink (1952) Nash-Fortenberry (1952) Washington, D.C. (1952) Flatwoods monster (1952) Ellsworth (1953) Kelly–Hopkinsville (1955) Lakenheath-Bentwaters (1956) Antônio Villas Boas (1957) Levelland (1957) Trindade Island (1958) Barney and Betty Hill abduction (1961) Lonnie Zamora incident (1964) Solway Firth Spaceman (1964) Exeter (1965) Kecksburg (1965) Westall (1966) Shag Harbour (1967) Finnish Air Force (1969) Pascagoula Abduction (1973) Travis Walton incident (1975) Allagash (1976) Tehran (1976) Petrozavodsk phenomenon (1977) Operação Prato (1977) Zanfretta UFO Incident (1978) Valentich disappearance (1978) Kaikoura Lights (1978) Robert Taylor incident (1979) Val Johnson incident (1979) Cash-Landrum incident (1980) Rendlesham Forest (1980) Trans-en-Provence (1981) Japan Air Lines (1986) Voronezh UFO incident (1989) Belgian UFO wave (1990) Varginha (1996) Phoenix Lights (1997) 21st century USS Nimitz UFO incident (2004) Campeche, Mexico (2004) O'Hare Airport (2006) Alderney (2007) Norway (2009) USS Theodore Roosevelt UFO incidents (2014) Confirmed hoaxes Maury Island incident Aztec, New Mexico, UFO incident Morristown UFO hoax Sightings by country Argentina Australia Belarus Belgium Brazil Canada China France India Indonesia Iran Italy Mexico New Zealand Norway Philippines Russia South Africa Spain (Canary Islands) Sweden Thailand United Kingdom United States Types of UFOs Black triangle Flying saucer Foo fighter Ghost rockets Green fireballs Mystery airship Space jellyfish Types of alleged extraterrestrial beings Energy beings Grey aliens Insectoids Little green men Nordic aliens Reptilian humanoids Studies The Flying Saucers Are Real (1947–1950) Project Sign (1948) Project Grudge (1949) Flying Saucer Working Party (1950) Project Magnet (1950–1962) Project Blue Book (1952–1970) Robertson Panel (1953) National Investigations Committee On Aerial Phenomena (1956-1980) Condon Report (1966–1968) Institute 22 (1978–?) Project Condign (1997–2000) Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (2007–2012) Identification studies of UFOs Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon Task Force (current) Hypotheses Ancient astronauts Cryptoterrestrial Extraterrestrial Interdimensional Psychosocial Nazi UFOs Trotskyist-Posadism Conspiracy theories Area 51 Storm Area 51 Bob Lazar Dulce Base Majestic 12 Men in black Project Serpo Involvement Abduction claims History Entities Claimants Narrative Perspectives Insurance Other Implants Cattle mutilation Close encounter Contactee Crop circles Government responses GEIPAN Organizations Ufologists Culture Conventions Fiction Religions list Skepticism List of scientific skeptics Committee for Skeptical Inquiry Category Authority control BIBSYS: 95002655 BNE: XX927324 BNF: cb120201511 (data) CANTIC: a10875633 CiNii: DA07864937 GND: 100314244 ISNI: 0000 0000 8169 4665 LCCN: n79063433 NKC: mzk2003200503 NTA: 070224986 SELIBR: 81159 SUDOC: 028347749 VcBA: 495/77375 VIAF: 100202247 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n79063433 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Julius_Obsequens&oldid=990804020" Categories: Latin-language writers Ancient Roman writers UFO sightings UFO writers 4th-century Romans 4th-century Latin writers Julii Hidden categories: Articles containing Latin-language text Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata Accuracy disputes from June 2011 All accuracy disputes Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CANTIC identifiers Wikipedia articles with CINII identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Asturianu Български Català Deutsch Español Français Galego Italiano Latina Magyar Nederlands 日本語 Português Русский Slovenčina Українська Tiếng Việt Edit links This page was last edited on 26 November 2020, at 16:20 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1922 ---- Venosa - Wikipedia Venosa From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search "Venusia" redirects here. For the genus of moth, see Venusia (moth). For other uses, see Venosa (disambiguation). Comune in Basilicata, Italy Venosa Comune Città di Venosa Coat of arms Location of Venosa Venosa Location of Venosa in Italy Show map of Italy Venosa Venosa (Basilicata) Show map of Basilicata Coordinates: 40°57′42.37″N 15°48′53.23″E / 40.9617694°N 15.8147861°E / 40.9617694; 15.8147861Coordinates: 40°57′42.37″N 15°48′53.23″E / 40.9617694°N 15.8147861°E / 40.9617694; 15.8147861 Country Italy Region Basilicata Province Potenza (PZ) Government  • Mayor Tommaso Gammone Area[1]  • Total 170.39 km2 (65.79 sq mi) Elevation 415 m (1,362 ft) Population (31 December 2015)[2]  • Total 11,863  • Density 70/km2 (180/sq mi) Demonym(s) Venosini Time zone UTC+1 (CET)  • Summer (DST) UTC+2 (CEST) Postal code 85029 Dialing code 0972 Patron saint St Roch (formerly St Felix of Thibiuca) Saint day August 16 Website Official website Venosa (Lucano: Venòse) is a town and comune in the province of Potenza, in the southern Italian region of Basilicata, in the Vulture area. It is bounded by the comuni of Barile, Ginestra, Lavello, Maschito, Montemilone, Palazzo San Gervasio, Rapolla and Spinazzola. Contents 1 History 1.1 Ancient 1.2 Middle Ages 1.3 Modern era 2 Main sights 3 People 4 Twin towns 5 References 6 External links History[edit] Ancient[edit] The city was known as Venusia ("City of Venus") to the Romans, who credited its establishment—as Aphrodisia ("City of Aphrodite")—to the Homeric hero Diomedes. He was said to have moved to Magna Graecia in southern Italy following the Trojan War, seeking a life of peace and building the town and its temples to appease the anger of Aphrodite for the destruction of her beloved Troy. The town was taken by the Romans after the Third Samnite War in 291 BC and became a colony. No fewer than 20,000 men were sent there, owing to its military importance. Throughout the Hannibalic wars it remained faithful to Rome, and had a further contingent of colonists sent in 200 BC to replace its losses in war. In 190 BC the Appian way was extended to the town. Some coins of Venusia of this period exist. It took part in the Social War, and was recaptured by Quintus Metellus Pius; it then became a municipium, but in 43 BC its territory was assigned to the veterans of the triumvirs, and it became a colony once more. Horace was born here in 65 BC. It remained an important place under the Empire as a station on the Via Appia, though Theodor Mommsen's description of it as having branch roads to Aequum Tuticum and Potentia, and Kiepert's maps annexed to the volume, do not agree with one another.[3] Middle Ages[edit] After the fall of the Western Roman Empire, Venusia was sacked by the Heruls, and in 493 AD it was turned into the administrative centre of the area in the Ostrogothic kingdom of Italy, although later this role was moved to Acerenza. The Lombards made it a gastaldate in 570/590. In 842 Venosa was sacked by the Saracens, who were later ousted by Emperor Louis II. Next rulers in the 9th century were the Byzantines, who lost control of it after their defeat in 1041 by the Normans. Under the latter, Venosa was assigned to Drogo of Hauteville. In 1133 the town was sacked and set on fire by Roger II of Sicily. His later successor Frederick II had a castle built here where a Lombard outpost existed before, which was to house the Treasury (Ministry of Finances) of the Kingdom of Sicily. Frederick's son, Manfred of Sicily, was born here in 1232. After the latter's fall, the Hohenstaufens were replaced by the Angevines; King Charles of Anjou assigned Venosa as a county to his son Robert. Modern era[edit] After a series of different feudal lords, Venosa became a possession of the Orsini in 1453. Count Pirro Del Balzo, who had married Donata Orsini, built a new castle (1460–1470) and a cathedral. Then, under the Aragonese domination, followed the Gesualdo family (1561); amongst their number was the famous prince, musician and murderer Carlo Gesualdo. Despite the plague that had reduced its population from the 13,000 of 1503 to 6,000, Venosa had a flourishing cultural life under the Gesualdos: apart from the famous Carlo, other relevant figures of the period include the poet Luigi Tansillo (1510–1580) and the jurist Giovanni Battista De Luca (1614–1683). Venosa took part in the revolt of Masaniello in 1647. The Gesualdos were in turn followed by the Ludovisi and the Caracciolo families. Home to a traditionally strong republican tradition, Venosa had a role in the peasant revolts and the Carbonari movement of the early 19th century. A true civil war between baronial powers and supporters of the peasants' rights broke out in 1849, being harshly suppressed by the Neapolitan troops.(See Sicilian revolution of independence of 1848.) In 1861, after the fall of the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies during the Italian unification, Venosa was occupied by some bands of brigands under the command of Carmine Crocco in order to restore the Bourbon power in Basilicata. Main sights[edit] The Aragonese Castle. The Church of SS. Trinità. The Archaeological Area of Notarchirico. The Aragonese castle, built in 1470 by Pirro del Balzo Orsini. It has a square plan with four cylindrical towers. The shining sun, the del Balzo coat of arms, is visible on the western towers. It was turned into a residence by Carlo and Emanuele Gesualdo, who added also an internal loggia, the north-western wing and bastions used as prisons. From 1612 it was the seat of the Accademia dei Rinascenti. It is now home to the National Museum of Venosa, inaugurated in 1991, with ancient Roman and other findings up to the 9th century. The entrance is preceded by a fountain conceded by King Charles I of Anjou. Many fragments of Roman workmanship are built into the walls of the cathedral, which is due to Pirro del Balzo also (c. 1470). The abbey church of SS. Trinità is historically interesting; it was consecrated in 1059 by Pope Nicholas II and passed into the hands of the Knights of Saint John in the time of Boniface VIII (1295–1303). In the central aisle is the tomb of Alberada, the first wife of Robert Guiscard and mother of Bohemund. An inscription on the wall commemorates the great Norman brothers William Iron Arm, Drogo, Humfrey and Robert Guiscard. The bones of these brothers rest together in a simple stone sarcophagus opposite the tomb of Alberada. The church also contains some 14th-century frescoes. Behind it is a larger church, which was begun for the Benedictines about 1150, from the designs of a French architect, in imitation of the Cluniac church at Paray-le-Monial, but never carried beyond the spring of the vaulting. The ancient amphitheatre adjacent furnished the materials for its walls. Baroque Church of the Purgatory (or San Filippo Neri) The Archaeological Area of Notarchirico, in the communal territory. It covers the Palaeolithic period with eleven layers dating from 600,000 to 300,000 years ago. Remains of ancient wildlife, including extinct species of elephants, bisons and rhinoceroses, have been found, as well as a fragment of a femur of Homo erectus. Jewish catacombs with inscriptions in Hebrew, Greek and Latin show the importance of the Jewish population here in the 4th and 5th centuries.[3] Remains of the ancient city walls and of an amphitheatre still exist, and a number of inscriptions have been found there.[3] People[edit] Horace (65 BC – 8 BC): Roman poet Manfred (1232–1266): king of Sicily Bartolomeo Maranta (1500–1571): physician, botanist, and literary theorist Luigi Tansillo (1510–1568): poet Carlo Gesualdo (1566–1613): music composer, lutenist and nobleman Giovanni Battista de Luca (1614–1683): jurist and cardinal Giacomo Di Chirico (1844–1883): painter Mario de Bernardi (1893–1959): colonel and aviator Cinzia Giorgio (b. 1975): writer Twin towns[edit] Tortolì, Italy Bernalda, Italy References[edit] ^ "Superficie di Comuni Province e Regioni italiane al 9 ottobre 2011". Istat. Retrieved 16 March 2019. ^ "Popolazione Residente al 1° Gennaio 2018". Istat. Retrieved 16 March 2019. ^ a b c  One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Venusia". Encyclopædia Britannica. 27 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 1014. External links[edit] Wikimedia Commons has media related to Venosa. Official website v t e Basilicata · Comuni of the Province of Potenza Abriola Acerenza Albano di Lucania Anzi Armento Atella Avigliano Balvano Banzi Baragiano Barile Bella Brienza Brindisi Montagna Calvello Calvera Campomaggiore Cancellara Carbone Castelgrande Castelluccio Inferiore Castelluccio Superiore Castelmezzano Castelsaraceno Castronuovo di Sant'Andrea Cersosimo Chiaromonte Corleto Perticara Episcopia Fardella Filiano Forenza Francavilla in Sinni Gallicchio Genzano di Lucania Ginestra Grumento Nova Guardia Perticara Lagonegro Latronico Laurenzana Lauria Lavello Maratea Marsico Nuovo Marsicovetere Maschito Melfi Missanello Moliterno Montemilone Montemurro Muro Lucano Nemoli Noepoli Oppido Lucano Palazzo San Gervasio Paterno Pescopagano Picerno Pietragalla Pietrapertosa Pignola Potenza Rapolla Rapone Rionero in Vulture Ripacandida Rivello Roccanova Rotonda Ruoti Ruvo del Monte San Chirico Nuovo San Chirico Raparo San Costantino Albanese San Fele San Martino d'Agri San Paolo Albanese San Severino Lucano Sant'Angelo Le Fratte Sant'Arcangelo Sarconi Sasso di Castalda Satriano di Lucania Savoia di Lucania Senise Spinoso Teana Terranova di Pollino Tito Tolve Tramutola Trecchina Trivigno Vaglio Basilicata Venosa Vietri di Potenza Viggianello Viggiano Authority control GND: 4302067-7 MBAREA: 2bf82f05-6695-4288-8fd0-16d6be1f1032 NKC: ge608165 VIAF: 243578471 WorldCat Identities: viaf-243578471 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Venosa&oldid=977356195" Categories: Cities and towns in Basilicata Communes of the Province of Potenza Roman sites of Basilicata Coloniae (Roman) Archaeological sites in Italy Hidden categories: Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica with Wikisource reference Wikipedia articles incorporating text from the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata Articles containing Italian-language text Coordinates on Wikidata Pages using infobox settlement with image map1 but not image map Articles containing Neapolitan-language text Commons link is on Wikidata Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with MusicBrainz area identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Pages using the Kartographer extension Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Languages العربية تۆرکجه Bân-lâm-gú Български Català Cebuano Deutsch Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français Հայերեն Interlingua Italiano עברית Қазақша Latina Lumbaart Magyar Bahasa Melayu Nederlands 日本語 Napulitano Нохчийн Norsk bokmål Piemontèis Polski Português Română Русский Sicilianu Simple English Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Tarandíne Татарча/tatarça Türkçe Українська Vèneto Volapük Winaray 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 8 September 2020, at 10:36 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1925 ---- Aquileia - Wikipedia Aquileia From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search This article is about the aquileia in Italy. For its namesake, see Aglar Zainapora. Comune in Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Italy Aquileia Olee / Acuilee  (Friulian) Comune Comune di Aquileia The Basilica of Aquileia. Coat of arms Location of Aquileia Aquileia Location of Aquileia in Italy Show map of Italy Aquileia Aquileia (Friuli-Venezia Giulia) Show map of Friuli-Venezia Giulia Coordinates: 45°46′11.01″N 13°22′16.29″E / 45.7697250°N 13.3711917°E / 45.7697250; 13.3711917Coordinates: 45°46′11.01″N 13°22′16.29″E / 45.7697250°N 13.3711917°E / 45.7697250; 13.3711917 Country Italy Region Friuli-Venezia Giulia Province Udine (UD) Frazioni Beligna, Belvedere, Viola, Monastero Government  • Mayor Emanuele Zorino Area[1]  • Total 37.44 km2 (14.46 sq mi) Elevation 5 m (16 ft) Population (30 April 2017)[2]  • Total 3,302  • Density 88/km2 (230/sq mi) Demonym(s) Aquileiesi Time zone UTC+1 (CET)  • Summer (DST) UTC+2 (CEST) Postal code 33051 Dialing code 0431 Patron saint Sts. Hermagoras and Fortunatus Saint day July 12 Website Official website UNESCO World Heritage Site Official name Archaeological Area and the Patriarchal Basilica of Aquileia Criteria Cultural: iii, iv, vi Reference 825 Inscription 1998 (22nd session) Aquileia (UK: /ˌækwɪˈliːə/ AK-wil-EE-ə,[3] US: /ˌɑːkwɪˈleɪə/ AH-kwil-AY-ə,[4] Italian: [akwiˈlɛːja]; Friulian: Olee / Olea / Acuilee / Aquilee / Aquilea;[5] Venetian: Aquiłeja / Aquiłegia; German: Aglar / Agley / Aquileja; Slovene: Oglej) is an ancient Roman city in Italy, at the head of the Adriatic at the edge of the lagoons, about 10 kilometres (6 mi) from the sea, on the river Natiso (modern Natisone), the course of which has changed somewhat since Roman times. Today, the city is small (about 3,500 inhabitants), but it was large and prominent in classical antiquity as one of the world's largest cities with a population of 100,000 in the 2nd century AD.[6][7] and is one of the main archaeological sites of northern Italy. In late antiquity the city was the first city in the Italian Peninsula to be sacked by Attila the Hun. Contents 1 History 1.1 Classical Antiquity 1.1.1 Roman Republic 1.1.2 Roman Empire 1.2 Late Antiquity 1.3 Middle Ages 2 Main sights 2.1 Cathedral 2.2 Ancient Roman Remains 2.3 Others 3 Notable people 4 Twin towns – sister cities 5 See also 6 References 7 Sources 8 External links History[edit] Classical Antiquity[edit] A view of the archaeological area of Aquileia. Roman Republic[edit] Aquileia was founded as a colony by the Romans in 180/181 BC along the Natiso River, on land south of the Julian Alps but about 13 kilometres (8 mi) north of the lagoons. The colony served as a strategic frontier fortress at the north-east corner of transpadane Italy (on the far side of the Po river) and was intended to protect the Veneti, faithful allies of Rome during the invasion of Hannibal in the Second Punic War and during the Illyrian Wars. The colony would serve as a citadel to check the advance into Cisalpine Gaul of other warlike peoples, such as the hostile Carni to the northeast in what is now Carnia and Histri tribes to the southeast in what is now Istria. In fact, the site chosen for Aquileia was about 6 km from where an estimated 12,000 Celtic Taurisci nomads had attempted to settle in 183 BC. However, since the 13th century BC, the site, on the river and at the head of the Adriatic, had also been of commercial importance as the end of the Baltic amber (sucinum) trade. It is, therefore, theoretically not unlikely that Aquileia had been a Gallic oppidum even before the coming of the Romans. However, few Celtic artefacts have been discovered from 500 BC to the Roman arrival.[8] The colony was established with Latin Rights by the triumvirate of Publius Cornelius Scipio Nasica, Caius Flaminius, and Lucius Manlius Acidinus, two of whom were of consular and one of praetorian rank. Each of the men had first hand knowledge of Cisalpine Gaul. Nasica had conquered the Boii in 191. Flaminius had overseen the construction of the road named after him from Bononia (Bologna) to Arretium (Arezzo). Acidinus had conquered the Taurisci in 183.[9][10] The triumvirate led 3,000 families to settle the area[citation needed] meaning Aquileia probably had a population of 20,000 soon after its founding.[vague] Meanwhile, based on the evidence of names chiselled on stone, the majority of colonizing families came from Picenum, Samnium, and Campania, which also explains why the colony was Latin and not Roman. Among these colonists, pedites received 50 iugera of land each, centuriones received 100 iugera each, and equites received 140 iugera each. Either at the founding or not long afterwards, colonists from the nearby Veneti supplemented these families.[8] Roads soon connected Aquileia with the Roman colony of Bologna probably in 173 BC. In 148 BC, it was connected with Genua by the Via Postumia, which stretched across the Padanian plain from Aquileia through or near to Opitergium, Tarvisium, Vicetia, Verona, Bedriacum, and the three Roman colonies of Cremona, Placentia, and Dertona. The construction of the Via Popilia from the Roman colony of Ariminium to Ad Portum near Altinum in 132 BC improved communications still further. In the 1st century AD, the Via Gemina would link Aquileia with Emona to the east of the Julian Alps, and by 78 or 79 AD the Via Flavia would link Aquileia to Pula. Meanwhile, in 169 BC, 1,500 more Latin colonists with their families, led by the triumvirate of Titus Annius Lucius, Publius Decius Subulo, and Marcus Cornelius Cethegus, settled in the town as a reinforcement to the garrison.[11] The discovery of the gold fields near the modern Klagenfurt in 130 BC[12] brought the growing colony into further notice, and it soon became a place of importance, not only owing to its strategic military position, but as a centre of commerce, especially in agricultural products and viticulture. It also had, in later times at least, considerable brickfields. In 90 BC, the original Latin colony became a municipium and its citizens were ascribed to the Roman tribe Velina. The customs boundary of Italy was close by in Cicero's day. Julius Caesar visited the city on a number of occasions and pitched winter camp nearby in 59–58 BC. Roman Empire[edit] Although the Iapydes plundered Aquileia during the Augustan period, subsequent increased settlement and no lack of profitable work meant the city was able to develop its resources. Jewish artisans established a flourishing trade in glass-work. Metal from Noricum was forged and exported. The ancient Venetic trade in amber from the Baltic continued. Wine, especially its famous Pucinum was exported. Olive oil was imported from Proconsular Africa. By sea, the port of Aquae Gradatae (modern Grado, Friuli-Venezia Giulia) was developed. On land, Aquileia was the starting-point of several important roads leading outside Italy to the north-eastern portion of the empire — the road (Via Julia Augusta) by Iulium Carnicum (Zuglio) to Veldidena (mod. Wilten, near Innsbruck), from which branched off the road into Noricum, leading by Virunum (Klagenfurt) to Laurieum (Lorch) on the Danube, the road leading via Emona into Pannonia and to Sirmium (Sremska Mitrovica), the road to Tarsatica (near Fiume, now Rijeka) and Siscia (Sisak), and the road to Tergeste (Trieste) and the Istrian coast. Augustus was the first of a number of emperors to visit Aquileia, notably during the Pannonian wars in 12–10 BC. It was the birthplace of Tiberius' son by Julia, in the latter year. The Roman poet Martial praised Aquileia as his hoped for haven and resting place in his old age.[13] In terms of religion, the populace adopted the Roman pantheon, although the Celtic sun-god, Belenus, had a large following. Jews practised their ancestral religion and it was perhaps some of these Jews who became the first Christians. Meanwhile, soldiers brought the martial cult of Mithras. The ancient inland port of Aquileia In the war against the Marcomanni in 167, the town was hard pressed; its fortifications had fallen into disrepair during the long peace. Nevertheless, when in 168 Marcus Aurelius made Aquileia the principal fortress of the empire against the barbarians of the North and East, it rose to the pinnacle of its greatness and soon had a population of 100,000. Septimius Severus visited in 193. In 238, when the town took the side of the Senate against the emperor Maximinus Thrax, the fortifications were hastily restored, and proved of sufficient strength to resist for several months, until Maximinus himself was assassinated. Late Antiquity[edit] An imperial palace was constructed in Aquileia, in which the emperors after the time of Diocletian frequently resided. Roman Emperor Flavius Victor on this as struck in Aquileia mint. During the 4th century, Aquileia maintained its importance. Constantine sojourned there on numerous occasions. It became a naval station and the seat of the Corrector Venetiarum et Histriae; a mint was established, of which the coins were very numerous, and the bishop obtained the rank of metropolitan archbishop. A council held in the city in 381 was only the first of a series of Councils of Aquileia that have been convened over the centuries. However, the city played a part in the struggles between the rulers of the 4th century. In 340, the emperor Constantine II was killed nearby while invading the territory of his younger brother Constans. Aquileia in a 1493 woodcut from Hartmann Schedel's Nuremberg Chronicle At the end of the 4th century, Ausonius enumerated Aquileia as the ninth among the great cities of the world, placing Rome, Constantinople, Carthage, Antioch, Alexandria, Trier, Mediolanum, and Capua before it. However, such prominence made it a target and Alaric and the Visigoths besieged it in 401, during which time some of its residents fled to the nearby lagoons. Alaric again attacked it in 408. Attila attacked the city in 452. During this invasion, on July 18, Attila and his Huns so utterly destroyed the city that it was afterwards hard to recognize its original site. The fall of Aquileia was the first of Attila's incursions into Roman territory; followed by cities like Mediolanum and Ticinum.[14] The Roman inhabitants, together with those of smaller towns in the neighbourhood, fled en masse to the lagoons, and so laid the foundations of the cities of Venice and nearby Grado. Yet Aquileia would rise again, though much diminished, and continue to exist until the Lombards invaded in 568; the Lombards destroyed it a second time in 590. Meanwhile, the patriarch fled to the island town of Grado, which was under the protection of the Byzantines. When the patriarch residing in Grado reconciled with Rome in 606, those continuing in the Schism of the Three Chapters, rejecting the Second Council of Constantinople, elected a patriarch at Aquileia. Thus, the diocese was essentially divided into two parts, with the mainland patriarchate of Aquileia under the protection of the Lombards, and the insular patriarchate of Aquileia seated in Grado being protected by the exarchate of Ravenna and later the Doges of Venice, with the collusion of the Lombards. The line of the patriarchs elected in Aquileia would continue in schism until 699 CE. However, although they kept the title of patriarch of Aquileia, they moved their residence first to Cormons and later to Cividale. Middle Ages[edit] Main article: Patriarchate of Aquileia (State) The Lombard dukes of Friuli ruled Aquileia and the surrounding mainland territory from Cividale. In 774, Charlemagne conquered the Lombard duchy and made it into a Frankish one with Eric of Friuli as duke. In 787, Charlemagne named the priest and master of grammar at the Palace School of Paulinus II, the new patriarch of Aquileia. The patriarchate, despite being divided with a northern portion assigned to the pastoral care of the newly created Archbishopric of Salzburg, would remain one of the largest dioceses. Although Paulinus resided mainly at Cividale, his successor Maxentius considered rebuilding Aquileia. However, the project never came to fruition. While Maxentius was patriarch, the pope approved the Synod of Mantua, which affirmed the precedence of the mainland patriarch of Aquileia over the patriarch of Grado. However, material conditions were soon to worsen for Aquileia. The ruins of Aquileia were continually pillaged for building material. And with the collapse of the Carolingians in the 10th century, the inhabitants would suffer under the raids of the Magyars. By the 11th century, the patriarch of Aquileia had grown strong enough to assert temporal sovereignty over Friuli and Aquileia. The Holy Roman Emperor gave the region to the patriarch as a feudal possession. However, the patriarch's temporal authority was constantly disputed and assailed by the territorial nobility. In 1027 and 1044 Patriarch Poppo of Aquileia, who rebuilt the cathedral of Aquileia, entered and sacked neighbouring Grado, and, though the Pope reconfirmed the Patriarch of the latter in his dignities, the town never fully recovered, though it continued to be the seat of the Patriarchate until its formal transference to Venice in 1450. In the 14th century the Patriarchal State reached its largest extension, stretching from the Piave river to the Julian Alps and northern Istria. The seat of the Patriarchate of Aquileia had been transferred to Udine in 1238, but returned to Aquiliea in 1420 when Venice annexed the territory of Udine. In 1445, the defeated patriarch Ludovico Trevisan acquiesced in the loss of his ancient temporal estate in return for an annual salary of 5,000 ducats allowed him from the Venetian treasury. Henceforth only Venetians were allowed to hold the title of Patriarch of Aquileia. The Patriarchal State was incorporated in the Republic of Venice with the name of Patria del Friuli, ruled by a provveditore generale or a luogotenente living in Udine. The Patriarchal diocese was only finally officially suppressed in 1751, and the sees of Udine and Gorizia established from its territory. Interior of the Cathedral, with the mosaic pavement. Ancient mosaic in the Cathedral. The archaeological walk. Main sights[edit] Cathedral[edit] The Aquileia Cathedral is a flat-roofed basilica erected by Patriarch Poppo in 1031 on the site of an earlier church, and rebuilt about 1379 in the Gothic style by Patriarch Marquard of Randeck. The façade, in Romanesque-Gothic style, is connected by a portico to the so-called Church of the Pagans, and the remains of the 5th-century baptistery. The interior has a nave and two aisles, with a noteworthy mosaic pavement from the 4th century. The wooden ceiling is from 1526, while the fresco decoration belongs to various ages: from the 4th century in the St. Peter's chapel of the apse area; from the 11th century in the apse itself; from the 12th century in the so-called "Crypt of the Frescoes", under the presbytery, with a cycle depicting the origins of Christianity in Aquileia and the history of St. Hermagoras, first bishop of the city. Next to the 11th-century Romanesque chapel of the Holy Sepulchre, at the beginning of the left aisle, flooring of different ages can be seen: the lowest is from a Roman villa of the age of Augustus; the middle one has a typical cocciopesto pavement; the upper one, bearing blackening from Attila's fire, has geometrical decorations. Externally, behind the 9th-century campanile and the apse, is the Cemetery of the Fallen, where ten unnamed soldiers of World War I are buried. Saint Hermagoras is also buried there. Ancient Roman Remains[edit] Today, Aquileia is a town smaller than the colony first founded by Rome. Over the centuries, sieges, earthquakes, floods, and pillaging of the ancient buildings for materials means that no edifices of the Roman period remain above ground. The site of Aquileia, believed to be the largest Roman city yet to be excavated, is inscribed on the UNESCO World Heritage List. Excavations, however, have revealed some of the layout of the Roman town such as a segment of a street, the north-west angle of the town walls, the river port, and the former locations of baths, of an amphitheatre, of a Circus, of a cemetery, of the Via Sacra, of the forum, and of a market. The National Archaeological Museum contains over 2,000 inscriptions, statues and other antiquities, mosaics, as well as glasses of local production and a numismatics collection. Others[edit] In the Monastero fraction is a 5th-century Christian basilica, later a Benedictine monastery, which today houses the Palaeo-Christian Museum. Notable people[edit] Saint Chrysogonus was martyred here in the beginning of the 4th century. Twin towns – sister cities[edit] Aquileia is twinned with the following settlements:[15] Piran, Slovenia Maria Saal, Austria See also[edit] Schism of the Three Chapters Aquileian rite Councils of Aquileia List of Aquileia Bishops and patriarchs Acaste Bresciani References[edit] ^ "Superficie di Comuni Province e Regioni italiane al 9 ottobre 2011". Istat. Retrieved 16 March 2019. ^ "Popolazione Residente al 1° Gennaio 2018". Istat. Retrieved 16 March 2019. ^ "Aquileia". Collins English Dictionary. HarperCollins. Retrieved April 6, 2019. ^ "Aquileia". The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (5th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Retrieved April 6, 2019. ^ Bilingual name of Aquileja – Oglej in: Gemeindelexikon, der im Reichsrate Vertretenen Königreiche und Länder. Herausgegeben von der K.K. Statistischen Zentralkommission. VII. Österreichisch-Illyrisches Küstenland (Triest, Görz und Gradiska, Istrien) (in German). Vienna. 1910. ^ The Oxford Classical Dictionary, p. 129, at Google Books ^ A Brief History of Venice, p. 16, at Google Books ^ a b G. Bandelli, "Aquileia dalla fondazione al II secolo d.C" in Aquileia dalla fondazione al alto medioevo, M. Buora, ed. (Udine: Arte Grafiche Friulane, 1982), 20. ^ Livy, XL, 34, 2-4. ^ E. Mangani, F. Rebecchi, and M.J. Srazzulla, Emilia Venezie (Bari: Laterza & Figli, 1981), 210. ^ Livy XLIII 17,1 ^ Strabo IV. 208 ^ Martial, Epigrams lib. 4, 25: Aemula Baianis Altini litora villis et Phaethontei conscia silva rogi, quaeque Antenoreo Dryadum pulcherrima Fauno nupsit ad Euganeos Sola puella lacus, et tu Ledaeo felix Aquileia Timauo, hic ubi septenas Cyllarus hausit aquas: uos eritis nostrae requies portusque senectae, si iuris fuerint otia nostra sui. http://www.thelatinlibrary.com/martial/mart4.shtml ^ Jordanus (1997). "THE ORIGINS AND DEEDS OF THE GOTHS". Getica. University of Calgary. Archived from the original on 16 July 2011. Retrieved 16 August 2011. ^ "Gemellaggi". Retrieved 4 November 2014. Sources[edit] Catholic Encyclopedia Neher in Kirchenlexikon I, 1184–89 De Rubeis, Monumenta Eccles. Aquil. (Strasburg, 1740) Ferdinando Ughelli, Italia Sacra, I sqq.; X, 207 Cappelletti, Chiese d'Italia, VIII, 1 sqq. Menzano, Annali del Friuli (1858–68) Paschini, Sulle Origini della Chiesa di Aquileia (1904) Glaschroeder, in Buchberger's Kirchl. Handl. (Munich, 1904), I, 300-301 Hefele, Conciliengesch. II, 914–23. For the episcopal succession, see P. B. Gams, Series episcoporum (Ratisbon, 1873–86), and Eubel, Hierarchia Catholica Medii Aevi (Muenster, 1898). External links[edit] Wikivoyage has a travel guide for Aquileia. Wikimedia Commons has media related to Aquileia. Aquileia virtual tour (Italian Landmarks) Pre-Roman and Celtic Aquileia Aquileia featured on 10 Euro Italian Coin v t e Friuli – Venezia Giulia · Comuni of the former Province of Udine Aiello del Friuli Amaro Ampezzo Aquileia Arta Terme Artegna Attimis Bagnaria Arsa Basiliano Bertiolo Bicinicco Bordano Buja Buttrio Camino al Tagliamento Campoformido Campolongo Tapogliano Carlino Cassacco Castions di Strada Cavazzo Carnico Cercivento Cervignano del Friuli Chiopris-Viscone Chiusaforte Cividale del Friuli Codroipo Colloredo di Monte Albano Comeglians Corno di Rosazzo Coseano Dignano Dogna Drenchia Enemonzo Faedis Fagagna Fiumicello Villa Vicentina Flaibano Forgaria nel Friuli Forni Avoltri Forni di Sopra Forni di Sotto Gemona del Friuli Gonars Grimacco Latisana Lauco Lestizza Lignano Sabbiadoro Lusevera Magnano in Riviera Majano Malborghetto Valbruna Manzano Marano Lagunare Martignacco Mereto di Tomba Moggio Udinese Moimacco Montenars Mortegliano Moruzzo Muzzana del Turgnano Nimis Osoppo Ovaro Pagnacco Palazzolo dello Stella Palmanova Paluzza Pasian di Prato Paularo Pavia di Udine Pocenia Pontebba Porpetto Povoletto Pozzuolo del Friuli Pradamano Prato Carnico Precenicco Premariacco Preone Prepotto Pulfero Ragogna Ravascletto Raveo Reana del Rojale Remanzacco Resia Resiutta Rigolato Rive d'Arcano Rivignano Teor Ronchis Ruda San Daniele del Friuli San Giorgio di Nogaro San Giovanni al Natisone San Leonardo San Pietro al Natisone San Vito al Torre San Vito di Fagagna Santa Maria la Longa Sauris Savogna di Cividale Sedegliano Socchieve Stregna Sutrio Taipana Talmassons Tarcento Tarvisio Tavagnacco Terzo d'Aquileia Tolmezzo Torreano Torviscosa Trasaghis Treppo Grande Treppo Ligosullo Tricesimo Trivignano Udinese Udine Varmo Venzone Verzegnis Villa Santina Visco Zuglio v t e World Heritage Sites in Italy Northwest Crespi d'Adda Genoa Ivrea Mantua and Sabbioneta Monte San Giorgio1 Porto Venere, Palmaria, Tino and Tinetto, Cinque Terre Corniglia Manarola Monterosso al Mare Riomaggiore Vernazza Residences of the Royal House of Savoy Castle of Moncalieri Castle of Racconigi Castle of Rivoli Castello del Valentino Royal Palace of Turin Palazzo Carignano Palazzo Madama, Turin Palace of Venaria Palazzina di caccia of Stupinigi Villa della Regina Rhaetian Railway in the Albula / Bernina Landscapes1 Rock Drawings in Valcamonica Sacri Monti of Piedmont and Lombardy Santa Maria delle Grazie, Milan Vineyard Landscape of Piedmont: Langhe-Roero and Monferrato Northeast Aquileia The Dolomites Ferrara Le Colline del Prosecco di Conegliano e Valdobbiadene Modena Cathedral, Torre della Ghirlandina and Piazza Grande, Modena Orto botanico di Padova Ravenna Venice Verona City of Vicenza and the Palladian Villas of the Veneto Central Assisi Basilica of Saint Francis of Assisi Etruscan Necropolises of Cerveteri and Tarquinia Florence Hadrian's Villa Medici villas Piazza del Duomo, Pisa Pienza Rome2 San Gimignano Siena Urbino Val d'Orcia Villa d'Este South Alberobello Amalfi Coast Castel del Monte, Apulia Cilento and Vallo di Diano National Park, Paestum and Velia, Certosa di Padula Herculaneum Oplontis and Villa Poppaea Naples Royal Palace of Caserta, Aqueduct of Vanvitelli and San Leucio Complex Pompeii Sassi di Matera Islands Aeolian Islands Arab-Norman Palermo and the Cathedral Churches of Cefalù and Monreale Archaeological Area of Agrigento Barumini nuraghes Mount Etna Syracuse and Necropolis of Pantalica Val di Noto Caltagirone Catania Militello in Val di Catania Modica Noto Palazzolo Acreide Ragusa Scicli Villa Romana del Casale Countrywide Longobards in Italy, Places of Power (568–774 A.D.) Brescia Cividale del Friuli Castelseprio Spoleto Temple of Clitumnus located at Campello sul Clitunno Santa Sofia located at Benevento Sanctuary of Monte Sant'Angelo located at Monte Sant'Angelo Prehistoric pile dwellings around the Alps3 Primeval Beech Forests of Europe4 Venetian Works of Defence between 15th and 17th centuries5 Bergamo Palmanova Peschiera del Garda 1 Shared with Switzerland 2 Shared with the Holy See 3 Shared with Austria, France, Germany, Slovenia, and Switzerland 4 Shared with Albania, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Germany, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain and Ukraine 5 Shared with Croatia and Montenegro Authority control BNE: XX461180 GND: 4002522-6 HDS: 006950 LCCN: n50059847 MBAREA: c2256257-d073-4c2e-8efe-b5343724680f NARA: 10044619 NKC: ge338926 NLI: 000971763 VIAF: 148893013 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n50059847 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aquileia&oldid=995802585" Categories: Cities and towns in Friuli-Venezia Giulia Communes of the Province of Udine Aquileia World Heritage Sites in Italy Populated places established in the 2nd century BC States and territories established in the 2nd century BC 180 BC 180s BC establishments Roman sites of Friuli-Venezia Giulia Coloniae (Roman) Destroyed cities Former populated places in Italy Domini di Terraferma Razed cities Hidden categories: CS1 German-language sources (de) Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata Articles containing Friulian-language text Articles containing Italian-language text Coordinates on Wikidata Pages using infobox settlement with image map1 but not image map Articles containing Venetian-language text Articles containing German-language text Articles containing Slovene-language text All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from December 2016 All Wikipedia articles needing clarification Wikipedia articles needing clarification from December 2016 Commons link is on Wikidata Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with HDS identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with MusicBrainz area identifiers Wikipedia articles with NARA identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLI identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Pages using the Kartographer extension Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikivoyage Languages Afrikaans Alemannisch Ænglisc العربية Asturianu تۆرکجه Bân-lâm-gú Беларуская Български Brezhoneg Català Cebuano Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français Furlan Հայերեն Hrvatski Bahasa Indonesia Interlingua Italiano עברית ქართული Kurdî Latina Latviešu Lietuvių Lumbaart Magyar Malagasy മലയാളം მარგალური Bahasa Melayu Nederlands 日本語 Napulitano Norsk bokmål Piemontèis Polski Português Română Русский Sardu Sicilianu Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Tarandíne ไทย Türkçe Українська اردو Vèneto Tiếng Việt Volapük Winaray 吴语 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 22 December 2020, at 23:47 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1929 ---- National Library of Korea - Wikipedia National Library of Korea From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia   (Redirected from NLK (identifier)) Jump to navigation Jump to search National Library of Korea 국립중앙도서관 Established October 15, 1945 (75 years ago) (1945-10-15) Location Banpo-dong, Seocho-gu, Seoul, South Korea Branches 2 Collection Size 12,565,821 Legal deposit Library Act, art. 20 Access and use Circulation library does not publicly circulate Population served all citizen (age over 16) Other information Director Suh Hye Ran, Chief Executive Website www.nl.go.kr Korean name Hangul 국립중앙도서관 Hanja 國立中央圖書館 Revised Romanization Gungnip Jungang Doseogwan McCune–Reischauer Kungnip Chung'ang Tosŏgwan The National Library of Korea is located in Seoul, South Korea and was established in 1945. It houses over 10 million volumes, including over 1,134,000 foreign books and some of the National Treasures of South Korea. It was relocated within Seoul, from Sogong-dong, Jung-gu to Namsan-dong in 1974, and again to the present location at Banpo-dong, Seocho-gu, in 1988. It was transferred from the Ministry of Education to the Ministry of Culture in 1991. Contents 1 Public transport connection 2 Collection Statistics 3 See also 4 External links 5 References Public transport connection[edit] Exterior of National Library of Korea The library is served by Seoul Subway Lines 3, 7 and 9 which all connect at Express Bus terminal Station. Collection Statistics[edit] As on November 2020; Total Domestic Books Foregin Books Non Books Old Books 12,768,751 9,158,363 1,552,489 1,771,738 286,161 See also[edit] National Digital Library of Korea National Library for Children and Young Adults Information Center on North Korea The National Library for the Disabled National Assembly Library of Korea List of national and state libraries External links[edit] Official website (in English) Wikimedia Commons has media related to National Library of Korea. References[edit] Choi, Yoon Kyung; Chung, Yeon-Kyoung (2014). "A Study on Improvements for High Quality in National Library of Korea Subject Headings List". Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science. 48 (1): 75–95. doi:10.4275/KSLIS.2014.48.1.075. ISSN 1225-598X. v t e National libraries of Asia Sovereign states Afghanistan Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Bangladesh Bhutan Brunei Cambodia China Cyprus East Timor (Timor-Leste) Egypt Georgia India Indonesia Iran Iraq Israel Japan Jordan Kazakhstan North Korea South Korea Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Laos Lebanon Malaysia Maldives Mongolia Myanmar Nepal Oman Pakistan Philippines Qatar Russia Saudi Arabia Singapore Sri Lanka Syria Tajikistan Thailand Turkey Turkmenistan United Arab Emirates Uzbekistan Vietnam Yemen States with limited recognition Abkhazia Artsakh Northern Cyprus Palestine South Ossetia Taiwan Dependencies and other territories British Indian Ocean Territory Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Hong Kong Macau Book Category Asia portal Authority control BNE: XX96793 BNF: cb12321513b (data) GND: 7611729-7 ISNI: 0000 0001 2242 9500 LCCN: n81052631 NDL: 00288411 NKC: kn20060614002 NLA: 36269005 NLP: A26374432 SUDOC: 032125003 VIAF: 125318093 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n81052631 Coordinates: 37°29′51.14″N 127°0′11.74″E / 37.4975389°N 127.0032611°E / 37.4975389; 127.0032611 This article relating to library science or information science is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. v t e This Korea-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. v t e Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Library_of_Korea&oldid=989827632" Categories: Buildings and structures in Seocho District National libraries Libraries in Seoul 1945 establishments in Korea Libraries established in 1945 World Digital Library partners Library and information science stubs Korea stubs Hidden categories: Use dmy dates from July 2019 Articles containing Korean-language text Use of the tablewidth parameter in Infobox Korean name Official website different in Wikidata and Wikipedia Commons category link is on Wikidata Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with NDL identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLP identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Coordinates not on Wikidata All stub articles Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Languages Asturianu Башҡортса Català Čeština Deutsch Español فارسی Français 한국어 Հայերեն Ilokano Bahasa Indonesia ქართული Latina Македонски مصرى Bahasa Melayu Монгол 日本語 Polski Português Русский Српски / srpski Suomi Українська Tiếng Việt Winaray 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 21 November 2020, at 07:37 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1958 ---- Augustus (title) - Wikipedia Augustus (title) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia   (Redirected from Augustus (honorific)) Jump to navigation Jump to search For other uses of Augustus, see Augustus (disambiguation). Ancient Roman title This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Augustus" title – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (January 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) Coin of the emperor Diocletian, marked diocletianus augustus Augustus (plural augusti; /ɔːˈɡʌstəs/ aw-GUST-əs,[1] Classical Latin: [au̯ˈɡʊstʊs]; "majestic", "the increaser" or "venerable") was an ancient Roman title given as both name and title to Gaius Octavius (often referred to simply as Augustus), Rome's first Emperor. On his death, it became an official title of his successor, and was so used by Roman emperors thereafter. The feminine form Augusta was used for Roman empresses and other females of the Imperial family. The masculine and feminine forms originated in the time of the Roman Republic, in connection with things considered divine or sacred in traditional Roman religion. Their use as titles for major and minor Roman deities of the Empire associated the Imperial system and Imperial family with traditional Roman virtues and the divine will, and may be considered a feature of the Roman Imperial cult. In Rome's Greek-speaking provinces, "Augustus" was translated as sebastos (σεβαστός, "venerable"), or Hellenised as Augoustos (αὔγουστος). After the fall of the Roman Empire, Augustus was sometimes used as a name for men of aristocratic birth, especially in the lands of the Holy Roman Empire. It remains a given name for males. Contents 1 Title in Ancient Rome 1.1 Earliest usage 1.2 Imperial honorific 1.3 Feminine equivalent 2 Other uses 2.1 Holy Roman Empire 2.2 Brian Boru 3 See also 4 References Title in Ancient Rome[edit] Earliest usage[edit] Some thirty years before its first association with Caesar's heir, Augustus was an obscure honorific with religious associations. One early context (58 BC), associates it with provincial Lares (Roman household gods).[2] In Latin poetry and prose, it signifies the "elevation" or "augmentation" of what is already sacred or religious.[3] Some Roman sources connected it to augury, and Rome was said to have been founded with the "august augury" of Romulus.[4] A coin of the late 3rd century emperor Probus, marked with abbreviated titles and honorifics: imp·c·probus·invic·p·f· aug Imperial honorific[edit] See also: Sebastos The first true Roman Emperor known as "Augustus" (and first counted as a Roman Emperor) was Gaius Julius Caesar Octavianus (Octavian). He was the adopted son and heir of Julius Caesar, who had been murdered for his seeming aspiration to divine monarchy, then subsequently and officially deified. Octavian studiously avoided any association with Caesar's claims, other than acknowledging his position and duties as Divi filius, "son of the deified one". Nevertheless, his position was unique and extraordinary. He had ended Rome's prolonged and bloody civil war with his victory at Actium, and established a lasting peace. He was self-evidently favoured by the gods. As princeps senatus ("first man or head of the senate") he presided at senatorial meetings. He was pontifex maximus, chief priest of Roman state religion. He held consular imperium, with authority equal to the official chief executive, he was supreme commander of all Roman legions, and held tribunicia potestas ("tribunician power"). As a tribune, his person was inviolable (sacrosanctitas) and he had the right to veto any act or proposal by any magistrate within Rome. He was officially renamed Augustus by the Roman Senate on January 16, 27 BC – or perhaps the Senate ratified his own careful choice; "Romulus" had been considered, and rejected.[5][6] This name was deemed too blatant as it would make Octavius the second founder of Rome.[7] So his official renaming in a form vaguely associated with a traditionally Republican religiosity, but unprecedented as a cognomen, may have served to show that he owed his position to the approval of Rome and its gods, and possibly his own unique, elevated, "godlike" nature and talents.[citation needed] His full and official title was Imperator Caesar Divi Filius Augustus. Augustus' religious reforms extended or affirmed augusti as a near ubiquitous title or honour for various minor local deities, including the Lares Augusti of local communities, and obscure provincial deities such as the North African Marazgu Augustus. This extension of an Imperial honorific to major and minor deities of Rome and her provinces is considered a ground-level feature of Imperial cult, which continued until the official replacement of Rome's traditional religions by Christianity. The religious ambiguity of the title allowed for this kind of deification throughout the empire as subjects - beginning from Asia and Bithynia - adopted the worship of the genius or soul of Augustus, establishing a ruler-cult.[8] The title or name of Augustus was adopted by his successors, who held the name during their own lifetimes by virtue of their status, offices and powers. This included the Christian emperors. Most emperors also used imperator but others could and did bear the same title and functions. "Caesar" was used as a title, but was also the name of a clan within the Julian line.[citation needed] The first emperor bequeathed the title augustus to his adopted heir and successor Tiberius in his will.[9] From then on, though it conferred no specific legal powers, augustus was a titular element of the imperial name.[9] Subsequently, the title was bestowed by the Roman Senate.[9] Until the reign of Marcus Aurelius (r. 161–180), the title was unique to its bearer; in 161 Marcus Aurelius elevated Lucius Verus (r. 161–69) to augustus and both bore the title at the same time.[9] The date of an emperor's investiture with the title augustus was celebrated as the dies imperii and commemorated annually.[9] From the 3rd century, new emperors were often acclaimed as augusti by the army.[9] A late Byzantine example of Augustus in imperial titulature: in this miniature from ca. 1404, Manuel II Palaiologos is titled "basileus and autokrator of the Romans", but also "aei augoustos" ("always augustus"), after the late antique formula "semper augustus". The Tetrarchy instituted by Diocletian shared power between two augusti and two emperors titled caesares.[9] Nevertheless, as augustus senior Diocletian retained legislative power.[9] Diocletian and his eventual successor after the civil wars of the Tetrarchy, Constantine the Great both used the title semper augustus ('ever august'), which indicates a formalisation of the name in the late 3rd and early 4th century.[9] From the reign of Constantine onwards, the Greek: σεβαστός, translit. sebastós was abandoned as the translation of the Latin: augustus in favour of the homophone Greek: αὔγουστος, translit. aúgoustos.[9] Beginning with Valentinian the Great and his brother Valens, whom he raised to augustus pari iure, 'augustus without reserve' in 364, the concurrent augusti of the eastern and western provinces were of equal standing.[9] The last Roman Emperor to rule in the West, Romulus Augustus became known as Augustulus ("little Augustus"), due to the unimportance of his reign.[citation needed] After the victory over the Sasanian Empire in the Byzantine–Sasanian War of 602–628, the 7th century final phase of the Roman–Persian Wars, the emperor Heraclius introduced the Greek: βασιλεύς, translit. basileús, lit. "king" and the title aúgoustos fell out of favour.[9] Until Heraclius's 629 reforms, royal titles had been eschewed in Rome since the legendary overthrow of the Roman monarchy's last king Tarquinius Superbus by Lucius Junius Brutus in the late 6th century BC.[9] The Imperial titles of imperator, caesar, and augustus were respectively rendered in Greek as autokratōr, kaisar, and augoustos (or sebastos[10]). The Greek titles were used in the Byzantine Empire until its extinction in 1453, although sebastos lost its imperial exclusivity and autokratōr along with basileus became the exclusive title of the Byzantine Emperor. Feminine equivalent[edit] Further information: List of Augustae Augusta was the female equivalent of Augustus, and had similar origins as an obscure descriptor with vaguely religious overtones. It was bestowed on some women of the Imperial dynasties, as an indicator of worldly power and influence and a status near to divinity. There was no qualification with higher prestige. The title or honorific was shared by state goddesses associated with the Imperial regime's generosity and provision, such as Ceres, Bona Dea, Juno, Minerva, and Ops, and by local or minor goddesses around the empire. Other personifications perceived as essentially female and given the title Augusta include Pax (peace) and Victoria (victory). The first woman to receive the honorific Augusta was Livia Drusilla, by the last will of her husband Augustus. From his death (14 AD) she was known as Julia Augusta, until her own death in AD 29. Other uses[edit] Holy Roman Empire[edit] Charlemagne used the title serenissimus augustus as a prefix to his titles. The style assumed by Otto I was imperator augustus. The relative simplicity of the style and absence of any mention of Rome was in deference to Byzantium (although he would briefly use the title imperator augustus Romanorum ac Francorum (Emperor-Augustus of the Romans and Franks) in 966), which would soon reach the medieval apex of its power. By the 12th century, the standard style of the Emperor was Dei gratia Romanorum imperator semper augustus (By the grace of God, Emperor of the Romans, ever Augustus). The formula of semper augustus ("ever exalted") when translated into German in the late period of the Holy Roman Empire was not rendered literally, but as allzeit Mehrer des Reiches ("ever Increaser of the Realm"), from the transitive verbal meaning of augere "to augment, increase". Brian Boru[edit] The Irish High King Brian Boru (c. 941 – 1014) was described in the Annals of Ulster as ardrí Gaidhel Erenn & Gall & Bretan, August iartair tuaiscirt Eorpa uile ("High King of the Gaels of Ireland, the Norsemen and the Britons, Augustus of the whole of north-west Europe"), the only Irish king to receive that distinction.[11][12] See also[edit] Archons Auctoritas Basileus Caesar (title) Imperium List of Augustae References[edit] ^ Wells, John C. (1990). Longman pronunciation dictionary. Harlow, England: Longman. ISBN 0-582-05383-8. entry "Augustus" ^ Hornum, Michael B., Nemesis, the Roman state and the games, Brill, 1993, p.37 footnote 23, citing epigraphic evidence from the Roman province of Cisalpine Gaul. ^ It appears as such in works of Cicero, before its use by Octavian, later known as Augustus. See entry at Lewis and Short's Latin dictionary, online at perseus.org. ^ Haverfield, F J, "The name Augustus", Journal of Roman Studies, 5 (1915), pp. 249‑250, citing Ennius, Annales, 245 M. (494 V.) "Augusto augurio postquam incluta condita Romast". available from penelope.uchicago.edu ^ Cassius Dio|Roman History][1], 53.16.7 ^ Haverfield, F J, "The name Augustus", Journal of Roman Studies, 5 (1915), pp. 249‑250, available from penelope.uchicago.edu Octavian was also an augur. Haverfield surmises that the choice of "Augustus" as the name might also have meant to overshadow the legend "AUG" on coins issued by his defeated enemy Pompey' – where "AUG" signifies Pompey's status as an augur, defeated with the help of Augustus' superior augury. ^ Wacher, John (2002). The Roman World, Volume II. London: Routledge. p. 770. ISBN 0415263166. ^ Ferguson, John (1985). The Religions of the Roman Empire. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. p. 90. ISBN 0801493110. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Strothmann, Meret (Bochum) (2006-10-01). "Augustus [2]". Brill's New Pauly. ^ White, L. Michael (2005). From Jesus to Christianity: How Four Generations of Visionaries & Storytellers Created the New Testament and Christian Faith. San Francisco, CA: HarperCollins. p. 44. ISBN 9780060816100. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2017-05-27. Retrieved 2017-05-23.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) ^ "The Annals of Ulster". celt.ucc.ie. Archived from the original on 15 March 2009. Retrieved 30 March 2018. v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films v t e Imperial, royal, and noble styles Forms of address for popes, royalty, and nobility Western Holiness Imperial and Royal Majesty (HI&RM) Imperial and Most Faithful Majesty Imperial Majesty (HIM) Apostolic Majesty (HAM) Apostolic King Catholic Monarchs Catholic Majesty (HCM) Most Christian Majesty (HMCM) Most Faithful Majesty (HFM) Orthodox Majesty (HOM) Britannic Majesty (HBM) Most Excellent Majesty Most Gracious Majesty Royal Majesty (HRM) Majesty (HM) Grace (HG) Royal Highness (HRH) Monseigneur (Msgr) Exalted Highness (HEH) Highness (HH) Most Eminent Highness (HMEH) Serene Highness (HSH) Illustrious Highness (HIll.H) Excellency (HE) Most Excellent Most Illustrious Hochgeboren Hochwohlgeboren Wohlgeboren Much Honoured (The Much Hon.) Milord (Millourt) Antiquity Ancient Rome Pater Patriae Augustus Sebastos Dominus Middle Ages Sovereign and mediatised families in the Holy Roman Empire Imperial and Royal Highness (HI&RH) Imperial Highness (HIH) Royal Highness (HRH) Grand Ducal Highness (HGDH) Grand Highness Highness (HH) Ducal Serene Highness (HDSH) Serene Highness (HSH) Serenity (HS) Illustrious Highness (HIll.H) Grace (HG) Excellency (HE) Asian Duli Yang Maha Mulia Great king Khan Great Khan King of Kings Maharaja Mikado Shah Shogun Son of Heaven Islamic Amir al-umara Amir al-Mu'minin Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques Hadrat Sharif Sultanic Highness Countries France Georgia Netherlands Portugal United Kingdom Canada Scotland See also By the Grace of God Divine right of kings Defender of the Faith (Fidei defensor) Defender of the Holy Sepulchre Great Catholic Monarch List of current sovereign monarchs List of current constituent monarchs Sacred king Translatio imperii Victory title Don (honorific) Wikipedia:WikiProject Royalty and Nobility Authority control GND: 4143480-8 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Augustus_(title)&oldid=993743342" Categories: Roman emperors Ancient Roman titles Styles (forms of address) Imperial titles Hidden categories: CS1 maint: archived copy as title Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata Articles needing additional references from January 2013 All articles needing additional references Articles containing Ancient Greek (to 1453)-language text All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from January 2013 Articles containing Latin-language text Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Alemannisch العربية Azərbaycanca Беларуская Български Brezhoneg Català Čeština Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français 한국어 Hrvatski Bahasa Indonesia Italiano עברית Latina Magyar Македонски Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Norsk nynorsk Polski Português Română Rumantsch Русский Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Türkçe Українська Tiếng Việt 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 12 December 2020, at 06:42 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1969 ---- Category:Wikipedia articles with ICCU identifiers - Wikipedia Help Category:Wikipedia articles with ICCU identifiers From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search This category is for articles with ICCU identifiers. Please do not add subcategories. For more information, see Wikipedia:Authority control. Administrators: Please do not delete this category even if it is empty! This category may be empty occasionally or even most of the time. This is a maintenance category, used for maintenance of the Wikipedia project. It is not part of the encyclopedia and contains non-article pages, or groups articles by status rather than subject. Do not include this category in content categories. This is a tracking category. It builds and maintains a list of pages primarily for the sake of the list itself. They are not part of the encyclopedia's categorization scheme. This category is hidden on its member pages—unless the corresponding user preference (appearance → show hidden categories) is set. These categories are used to track, build and organize lists of pages needing "attention en masse" (for example, pages using deprecated syntax), or that may need to be edited at someone's earliest convenience. These categories also serve to aggregate members of several lists or sub-categories into a larger, more efficient list (discriminated by classifications). Contents: Top 0–9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z * # 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 • A Aa Ae Aj Ao At • B Ba Be Bj Bo Bt • C Ca Ce Cj Co Ct • D Da De Dj Do Dt • E Ea Ee Ej Eo Et • F Fa Fe Fj Fo Ft • G Ga Ge Gj Go Gt • H Ha He Hj Ho Ht • I Ia Ie Ij Io It • J Ja Je Jj Jo Jt • K Ka Ke Kj Ko Kt • L La Le Lj Lo Lt • M Ma Me Mj Mo Mt • N Na Ne Nj No Nt • O Oa Oe Oj Oo Ot • P Pa Pe Pj Po Pt • Q Qa Qe Qj Qo Qt • R Ra Re Rj Ro Rt • S Sa Se Sj So St • T Ta Te Tj To Tt • U Ua Ue Uj Uo Ut • V Va Ve Vj Vo Vt • W Wa We Wj Wo Wt • X Xa Xe Xj Xo Xt • Y Ya Ye Yj Yo Yt • Z Za Ze Zj Zo Zt Pages in this category should only be added by Module:Authority control. Pages in category "Wikipedia articles with ICCU identifiers" The following 200 pages are in this category, out of approximately 14,753 total. This list may not reflect recent changes (learn more). (previous page) (next page)A Hans von Aachen Bertus Aafjes Jeppe Aakjær Hans Aanrud Vilmos Aba-Novák Diego José Abad Paul Abadie Vasily Abaev Chris Abani Pedro Pablo Abarca de Bolea, 10th Count of Aranda Diego Abatantuono Carmine Abate Marco Abate Annibale degli Abati Olivieri Antonio Abati Baldo Angelo Abati Giuseppe Cesare Abba Marta Abba Emanuela Abbadessa Antoine Thomson d'Abbadie Claudio Abbado Marcello Abbado Roberto Abbado Nicola Abbagnano Eleonora Abbagnato Giuseppe Abbamonte Carmelo Abbate Lirio Abbate Mario Abbate Armanda Degli Abbati Giuseppe Abbati Pietro Abbati Marescotti Antonio Maria Abbatini Cleveland Abbe Edward Abbey Lynn Abbey Franco Abbiati Giuseppe Abbiati Charles Greeley Abbot Ezra Abbot George Abbot (bishop) Bud Abbott Edwin Abbott Abbott Eleanor Hallowell Abbott Frank Frost Abbott John Stevens Cabot Abbott Maria Abbracchio Dino Abbrescia Thomas Abbt Kader Abdolah Abdullah II of Jordan Achmed Abdullah Abdulmejid I Kōbō Abe Éliette Abécassis Gilbert Abbott à Beckett Louis Paul Abeille Alfred Abel Carl Friedrich Abel Heinrich Friedrich Otto Abel Niels Henrik Abel Othenio Abel Wilhelm Abel Giovanni Francesco Abela Peter Abelard Bernhard Rudolf Abeken Gian Carlo Abelli Raymond Abellio Louis Abelly Philip Abelson Robert Abelson Wolfgang Abendroth Miguel Abensour Adolf Aber David Abercrombie (linguist) John Abercrombie (physician) David Abercromby Ralph Abercromby (meteorologist) John Abernethy (surgeon) Hermann Abert Giancarlo Abete Antonio Abetti Giorgio Abetti Otto Wilhelm Hermann von Abich Johann Heinrich Abicht Nicolai Abildgaard Lucio Abis Walter Abish Nicolas Perrot d'Ablancourt Alexander Ablesimov Alberto Ablondi Keith Ablow Antonio Abondio Girolamo Abos Edmond François Valentin About Charles François d'Abra de Raconis Abraham bar Hiyya Gerald Abraham Henri Abraham Karl Abraham Max Abraham Paul Abraham Pearl Abraham Pierre Abraham Israel Abrahams Nicholas Abram Fyodor Abramov Marina Abramović Edward Abramowski Albert Abrams Laure Junot, Duchess of Abrantès Isaac Abarbanel Judah Leon Abravanel Ermilo Abreu Gómez Aleixo de Abreu Casimiro de Abreu Capistrano de Abreu Alexei Abrikosov (physicist) Michele Abruzzo Absadi Jean Absil Laurentius Abstemius Franz Abt Abu Firas al-Hamdani Nasr Abu Zayd Diana Abu-Jaber Mumia Abu-Jamal Theodore Abu Qurrah Abraham Abulafia David Abulafia Susan Abulhawa Enrique Sánchez Abulí Carla Accardi Salvatore Accardo Luisa Accati Enrico Accatino Torquato Accetto Donato Acciaioli Zanobi Acciaioli Filippo Acciaiuoli Niccolò Acciaioli Lucius Accius Benedetto Accolti the Elder Bernardo Accolti Benedetto Accolti the Younger Francesco Accolti Vito Acconci Ottavio Accoramboni Agostino Accorimboni Roberto Accornero Stefano Accorsi Mariangelo Accorso Elio Filippo Accrocca Felice Accrocca Friedrich Accum Accursius Franciscus Accursius Francesco Acerbi Giuseppe Acerbi Giacomo Acerbo Narziß Ach Émile Achard Léon Achard Louis Amédée Achard Marcel Achard Erik Acharius Gottfried Achenwall Luc d'Achery Dean Acheson Achilles Tatius Alessandro Achillini Claudio Achillini Giovanni Filoteo Achillini Joseph Achron Cristina Acidini André Aciman J. R. Ackerley Otto Ackermann (conductor) Theodor Ackermann Peter Ackroyd Nicola Acocella Émile Acollas Antonio Acqua Camillo Acqua Lorenzo Acquarone Andrea Matteo Acquaviva Belisario Acquaviva Claudio Acquaviva Sabino Acquaviva Francesco Acri Carlo Acton Ferdinando Acton John Dalberg-Acton, 1st Baron Acton Sir John Acton, 6th Baronet Joannes Actuarius Aleksandr Adabashyan Adam of Balsham Adam of Fulda Adam of Perseigne Adolphe Adam (previous page) (next page) Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Wikipedia_articles_with_ICCU_identifiers&oldid=974858545" Categories: Pages with ICCU identifiers Wikipedia articles with authority control information Hidden categories: Hidden categories Tracking categories Template Large category TOC via CatAutoTOC on category with 10,001–20,000 pages CatAutoTOC generates Large category TOC Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Category Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages עברית Edit links This page was last edited on 25 August 2020, at 12:38 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1991 ---- Eduard Fraenkel - Wikipedia Eduard Fraenkel From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search German-British classicist David Mortier Eduard Fraenkel Born (1888-03-17)17 March 1888 Berlin, German Empire Died 5 February 1970(1970-02-05) (aged 81) Oxford, England, United Kingdom Nationality German-British Occupation Philologist, Chair of Latin at Corpus Christi College, Oxford David Mortier Eduard Fraenkel (17 March 1888 in Berlin – 5 February 1970 in Oxford) was a German-British philologist. Contents 1 Background and early life 2 Oxford years and later life 3 Works 4 Selected writings 5 References Background and early life[edit] Eduard Fraenkel was born to Jewish parents in Berlin. His father was a wine dealer, and his mother the daughter of an important publishing family. At the age of ten, Fraenkel suffered from an attack of osteomyelitis in his right arm that deformed his right hand. From 1897 to 1906 he attended the Askanisches Gymnasium in Berlin, where he was educated in Greek and Latin. At University, he began to study law, but soon turned his attention to Classics at Berlin University under the great philologist Ulrich von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff. After two years, he moved from Berlin to Göttingen where he stayed until 1912, studying under Friedrich Leo (1851–1914). Oxford years and later life[edit] After losing his post under the antisemitic laws passed in 1933, Fraenkel emigrated to Great Britain. In 1934 he was elected to a Bevan fellowship at Trinity College, Cambridge, but later in the year took up the Corpus Chair of Latin at Corpus Christi College, Oxford, a post he held until 1953. He was known to be an impressive and exhilarating, if formidable, teacher of both Latin and Greek literature. His wartime seminars on Aeschylus's Agamemnon were famous both in their own right and also for forming the basis of his edition of the play, published in 1950, which remains a monument of 20th-century classical scholarship. After 1953 he continued teaching as an honorary fellow. He received the freedom of the city of Sarsina, the birthplace of the playwright Plautus, to whose study Fraenkel made groundbreaking and lasting contributions.[1] Several prominent female scholars have remarked since Fraenkel's death that he was known for inappropriate contact with his some of his female students during private lessons. Isobel Henderson, a tutor at Somerville College, warned students that they would learn much from Fraenkel but they would be "pawed about a bit." One of these students, the philosopher Baroness Mary Warnock, recounted being groped by Fraenkel in her memoirs.[2] Nevertheless, she later remarked that Fraenkel was the best teacher she had ever known and stresses that his status as a classical scholar is undiminished by his conduct towards women.[3] Cambridge classicist Mary Beard referred to him as a "serial groper", and noted that biographies omitted the "persistent sexual harassment" intrinsic to his teaching.[4] In a 2017 interview, Roger Tomlin described Fraenkel as "a bully": in the one seminar of Fraenkel's that Tomlin attended he described Fraenkel trying to embarrass women by asking them ridiculous questions, like what an 'ithyphallic metre' was.[5] Fraenkel took his own life on 5 February 1970, aged 81, a few hours after his wife died of natural causes.[2] Works[edit] Eduard Fraenkel was one of the most prominent and respected classical philologists of the 20th century, publishing studies of both Greek and Latin poets. Most well known are his book-length study of the Roman comic poet Plautus, Plautinisches im Plautus, which was later expanded and translated into Italian as Elementi Plautini in Plauto. An English version, entitled Plautine Elements in Plautus, was published in 2007 on the basis of the German and Italian versions. Also notable are his magisterial three volume text, commentary, and translation of the Agamemnon of Aeschylus, which remains one of the standard works of scholarship on that play, and a valuable study of the poetry of Horace. Selected writings[edit] — (1922). Plautinisches bei Plautus (in German). Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) — (2007). Plautine Elements in Plautus. Translated by Drevikovsky, Tomas; Muecke, Frances. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) — (1926). Die Stellung des Römertums in der humanistischen Bildung (in German). Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) — (1928). Iktus und Akzent im lateinischen Sprechvers (in German). Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) — (1930). Gedanken zu einer deutschen Vergilfeier (in German). Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) — (1933). Das Pindargedicht des Horaz (in German). Heidelberg: Carl Winter.CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) — (1950). Aeschylus: Agamemnon, edited with a commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) — (1957). Der Agamemnon des Aeschylus. Ein Vortrag (in German). Zürich: Artemis.CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) — (1957). Die sieben Redenpaare im Thebanerdrama des Aeschylus (in German). Munich: Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften.CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) — (1957). Horace. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) — (1963). Horaz (in German). Darmstadt: WBG.CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) — (1962). Beobachtungen zu Aristophanes (in German). Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) — (1963). Zu den Phoenissen des Euripides (in German). Munich: Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften.CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) — (1965). Noch einmal Kolon und Satz (in German). Munich: Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften.CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) Delz, Josef; — (2015). Schwarz, Georg; Nikitinski, Oleg (eds.). Briefwechsel 1947–1969. Eine Gelehrtenfreundschaft [Correspondence 1947–1969: A Scholarly Friendship] (in German). Munich: Symposion Eleutheron. ISBN 978-3-928411-81-3. OCLC 944186683.CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) References[edit] Di Benedetto, Vincenzo (2000). "Ricordo di Eduard Fraenkel" [I remember Eduard Fraenkel]. Annali della Scuola Normale di Pisa. IV (in Italian). 5: 1–20. JSTOR 24308296. Krömer, Dietfried (1993). "Eduard Fraenkel (1888–1970)". Eikasmós. IV: 169–174. ISSN 1121-8819. ^ "Fraenkel, Eduard David Mortier". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/33241. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.) ^ a b Beard, Mary (2013). "What Gets Left Out". Confronting the classics: traditions, adventures, and innovations. London: Profile Books. pp. 263–69. ISBN 9781847658883. OCLC 843527477. ^ Beard, Mary (1 August 2006). "Keeping sex out of scholarship". Times Literary Supplement. ^ "Scholar fires sex harassment row". Times Higher Education (THE). 18 August 2006. Retrieved 4 December 2017. ^ Czeti, I.; Seres, D. (2019). ""I try to publish whatever turns up": Interview with Roger S. O. Tomlin". Litterae Magicae: Studies in Honour of Roger S. O. Tomlin. pp. 19–27. Authority control BIBSYS: 90226070 BNE: XX1273617 BNF: cb121790696 (data) CiNii: DA0210829X GND: 116690496 ISNI: 0000 0001 1029 4653 LCCN: n80159792 NKC: mub20181001483 NLA: 35878911 NLI: 000221673 NSK: 000069055 NTA: 067623557 RERO: 02-A003256913 SNAC: w65n6bqr SUDOC: 030359341 Trove: 1128063 VcBA: 495/76354 VIAF: 73896802 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n80159792 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Eduard_Fraenkel&oldid=983709558" Categories: 1888 births 1970 deaths German classical philologists British classical philologists Corpus Christi Professors of Latin Writers from Berlin Fellows of Corpus Christi College, Oxford German male writers Jewish emigrants from Nazi Germany to the United Kingdom German emigrants to England University of Freiburg faculty Suicides in England Hidden categories: Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the ODNB Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata Use dmy dates from March 2020 Articles with hCards CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list CS1 German-language sources (de) CS1 Italian-language sources (it) Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CINII identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLI identifiers Wikipedia articles with NSK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with RERO identifiers Wikipedia articles with SNAC-ID identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with Trove identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Íslenska Italiano עברית Latina Svenska Edit links This page was last edited on 15 October 2020, at 20:05 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-1995 ---- Tetrarchy - Wikipedia Tetrarchy From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Period of Roman history when power was divided among four rulers This article is about the tetrarchy created by Diocletian. For the tetrarchy formed from the kingdom of Herod, see Tetrarchy (Judea). For other uses, see Tetrarch (disambiguation). This article includes a list of general references, but it remains largely unverified because it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (May 2012) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) Roman imperial dynasties The Tetrarchy Portrait of the Four Tetrarchs, two porphyry sculptures looted from the Philadelphion of Constantinople after 1204, now standing at the southwest corner of St Mark's Basilica, Venice Chronology Diocletian as Augustus 284–286 -with Maximian as Augustus of the West 286–293 -with Galerius and Constantius Chlorus as Caesares 293–305 Maximian as the sole Caesar 285–286 -with Diocletian as Augustus of the East 286–305 -with Galerius and Constantius Chlorus as Caesares 293–305 Galerius and Constantius Chlorus as Caesares 293–305 Galerius and Constantius Chlorus as Augusti of East and West 305–306 -with Severus and Maximinus Daia as Caesares 305–306 Galerius and Severus as Augusti of East and West 306–307 -with Maximinus Daia and Constantine the Great as Caesares 306–307 Galerius and Maxentius as Augusti of East and West 307–308 -with Maximinus Daia and Constantine the Great as Caesares 307–308 Galerius and Licinius as Augusti of East and West 308–311 -with Maximinus Daia and Constantine the Great as Caesares 308–311 Maxentius as usurper in Rome (and Asia Minor 311–312) 308–312 Maximinus Daia and Licinius as Augusti of East and West 311–312 -with Constantine the Great as Caesar (self-proclaimed Augustus) 311–312 Licinius and Constantine the Great as Augusti of East and West 312–324 -with Licinius II and Constantine II, Crispus as Caesares 317–324 Succession Preceded by Crisis of the Third Century Followed by Constantinian dynasty Ancient Rome This article is part of a series on the politics and government of ancient Rome Periods Roman Kingdom 753–509 BC Roman Republic 509–27 BC Roman Empire 27 BC – AD 395 Principate 27 BC – AD 284 Dominate AD 284–641 Western AD 395–476 Eastern AD 395–1453 Timeline Roman Constitution Constitution of the Kingdom Constitution of the Republic Constitution of the Empire Constitution of the Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Executive magistrates Precedent and law Roman law Ius Imperium Mos maiorum Collegiality Auctoritas Roman citizenship Cursus honorum Senatus consultum Senatus consultum ultimum Assemblies Centuriate Curiate Plebeian Tribal Ordinary magistrates Consul Praetor Quaestor Promagistrate Aedile Tribune Censor Governor Extraordinary magistrates Corrector Dictator Magister equitum Consular tribune Rex Triumviri Decemviri Titles and honours Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Praeses Praefectus Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Other countries v t e Part of a series of articles on Monarchy Central concepts Monarch Monarchism Imperialism Divine right of kings Mandate of Heaven Types Absolute Chinese Legalist Composite Constitutional Crowned republic Diarchy Dual Elective Emirate Ethnarch Federal Hereditary Personal union Non-sovereign Popular Regency Coregency Tetrarch Triarchy Universal History Birth of the Roman Empire Magna Carta Foundation of the Ottoman Empire Glorious Revolution French Revolution Trienio Liberal First French Empire Liberal Wars Second French Empire Italian unification Meiji Restoration Austro-Hungarian Compromise German unification 5 October 1910 Revolution Proclamation of the Republic in Brazil Chinese Revolution Russian Revolution Siamese revolution of 1932 Birth of the Italian Republic Spanish transition to democracy Iranian Revolution Modern Cambodia Nepalese Civil War Related topics Aristocracy Nobility Autocracy Chamberlain Conservatism Despotism Dynasty List Enlightened absolutism Thomas Hobbes Legitimists Orléanist Oligarchy Peerage Philosopher king Primogeniture Rank Royalism Regicide Regnal number Royal family Style Ultra-royalist Politics portal v t e The Tetrarchy is the term adopted to describe the system of government of the ancient Roman Empire instituted by Roman Emperor Diocletian in 293, marking the end of the Crisis of the Third Century and the recovery of the Roman Empire. The government of the empire was divided between the two senior emperors, the augusti, and their juniors and designated successors, the caesares. Initially Diocletian chose Maximian as his caesar in 285, raising him to co-augustus the following year; Maximian was to govern the western provinces and Diocletian would administer the eastern ones. The role of the augustus was likened to Jupiter, while his caesar was akin to Jupiter's son Hercules. Galerius and Constantius were appointed caesares in March 293. Diocletian and Maximian retired on 1 May 305, raising Galerius and Constantius to the rank of augustus. Their places as caesares were in turn taken by Valerius Severus and Maximinus Daia. The orderly system of two senior and two junior emperors endured until Constantius died in July 306, and his son Constantine was unilaterally acclaimed augustus and caesar by his father's army. Maximian's son Maxentius contested Severus's title, styled himself princeps invictus, and was appointed caesar by his retired father in 306. Severus surrendered to Maximian and Maxentius in 307. Maxentius and Constantine were both recognized as augusti by Maximian that same year. Galerius appointed Licinius augustus for the west in 308 and elevated Maximinus Daia to augustus in 310. Constantine's victory over Maxentius at the Battle of the Milvian Bridge in 312 left him in control of the western part of the empire, while Licinius was left in control of the east on the death of Maximinus Daia. Constantine and Licinius jointly recognized their sons – Crispus, Constantine II, and Licinius II – as caesares in March 317. Ultimately the tetrarchic system lasted until c. 324, when mutually destructive civil wars eliminated most of the claimants to power: Licinius resigned as augustus after the losing the Battle of Chrysopolis, leaving Constantine in control of the entire empire. The Constantinian dynasty's emperors retained some aspects of collegiate rule; Constantine appointed his son Constantius II as another caesar in 324, followed by Constans in 333 and his nephew Dalmatius in 335, and the three surviving sons of Constantine in 337 were declared joint augusti together, and the concept of the division of the empire under multiple joint emperors endured until the Fall of the Western Roman Empire. In the Eastern Roman empire, augusti and caesares continued to be appointed sporadically. Contents 1 Terminology 2 Creation 3 Regions and capitals 4 Public image 5 Military successes 6 Demise 7 Emperors 8 Detailed timeline 9 Simplified timeline 9.1 Tetrarchy until 1 May 305 9.2 Tetrarchy until July 306 9.3 Tetrarchy until 16 May 307 9.4 Tetrarchy from 18 November 308 to the beginning of May 311 9.5 Tetrarchy from May 311 9.6 Tetrarchy after 8 October 316 to the end of 316 9.7 Tetrarchy from 1 March 317 to 18 September 324 10 Legacy 11 Other examples 12 See also 13 Notes 14 Citations 15 References 16 External links Terminology[edit] The term "tetrarchy" (from the Greek: τετραρχία, tetrarchia, "leadership of four [people]")[a] describes any form of government where power is divided among four individuals. Although the term "tetrarch" was current in antiquity, it was never used of the imperial college under Diocletian. Instead, the term was used to describe independent portions of a kingdom that were ruled under separate leaders. The tetrarchy of Judaea, established after the death of Herod the Great, is the most famous example of the antique tetrarchy. The term was understood in the Latin world as well, where Pliny the Elder glossed it as follows: "each is the equivalent of a kingdom, and also part of one" (regnorum instar singulae et in regna contribuuntur).[1] As used by the ancients, the term describes not only different governments, but also a different system of government from the Diocletianic arrangements. The Judaean tetrarchy was a set of four independent and distinct states, where each tetrarch ruled a quarter of a kingdom as they saw fit; the Diocletianic tetrarchy was a college led by a single supreme leader. When later authors described the period, this is what they emphasized: Ammianus had Constantius II admonish Gallus for disobedience by appealing to the example in submission set by Diocletian's lesser colleagues; his successor Julian compared the Diocletianic tetrarchs to a chorus surrounding a leader, speaking in unison under his command.[2] Only Lactantius, a contemporary of Diocletian and a deep ideological opponent of the Diocletianic state, referred to the tetrarchs as a simple multiplicity of rulers.[3] Much modern scholarship was written without the term. Although Edward Gibbon pioneered the description of the Diocletianic government as a "New Empire", he never used the term "tetrarchy"; neither did Theodor Mommsen. It did not appear in the literature until used in 1887 by schoolmaster Hermann Schiller in a two-volume handbook on the Roman Empire (Geschichte der Römischen Kaiserzeit), to wit: "die diokletianische Tetrarchie". Even so, the term did not catch on in the literature until Otto Seeck used it in 1897.[4] On the reverse of this argenteus struck in Antioch under Constantius I, the tetrarchs offer sacrifice to celebrate a victory against the Sarmatians. Creation[edit] The first phase, sometimes referred to as the diarchy ("rule of two"), involved the designation of the general Maximian as co-emperor—firstly as caesar (junior emperor) in 285, followed by his promotion to augustus in 286. Diocletian took care of matters in the eastern regions of the empire while Maximian similarly took charge of the western regions. In 293, Diocletian thought that more focus was needed on both civic and military problems, so with Maximian's consent, he expanded the imperial college by appointing two caesares (one responsible to each augustus)—Galerius and Constantius I.[5] In 305, the senior emperors jointly abdicated and retired, allowing Constantius and Galerius to be elevated in rank to augustus. They in turn appointed two new caesares—Severus II in the west under Constantius, and Maximinus in the east under Galerius—thereby creating the second Tetrarchy. Regions and capitals[edit] Map of the Roman Empire under the Tetrarchy, showing the dioceses and the four tetrarchs' zones of influence. The four tetrarchs based themselves not at Rome but in other cities closer to the frontiers, mainly intended as headquarters for the defence of the empire against bordering rivals (notably Sassanian Persia) and barbarians (mainly Germanic, and an unending sequence of nomadic or displaced tribes from the eastern steppes) at the Rhine and Danube. These centres are known as the tetrarchic capitals. Although Rome ceased to be an operational capital, Rome continued to be nominal capital of the entire Roman Empire, not reduced to the status of a province but under its own, unique Prefect of the City (praefectus urbi, later copied in Constantinople). The four tetrarchic capitals were: Nicomedia in northwestern Asia Minor (modern Izmit in Turkey), a base for defence against invasion from the Balkans and Persia's Sassanids was the capital of Diocletian, the eastern (and most senior) augustus; in the final reorganisation by Constantine the Great, in 318, the equivalent of his domain, facing the most redoubtable foreign enemy, Sassanid Persia, became the praetorian prefecture Oriens, 'the East', the core of later Byzantium. Sirmium (modern Sremska Mitrovica in the Vojvodina region of modern Serbia, and near Belgrade, on the Danube border) was the capital of Galerius, the eastern caesar; this was to become the Balkans-Danube prefecture Illyricum. Mediolanum (modern Milan, near the Alps) was the capital of Maximian, the western augustus; his domain became "Italia et Africa", with only a short exterior border. Augusta Treverorum (modern Trier, in Germany) was the capital of Constantius, the western caesar, near the strategic Rhine border; it had been the capital of Gallic emperor Tetricus I. This quarter became the prefecture Galliae. Aquileia, a port on the Adriatic coast, and Eboracum (modern York, in northern England near the Celtic tribes of modern Scotland and Ireland), were also significant centres for Maximian and Constantius respectively. In terms of regional jurisdiction there was no precise division among the four tetrarchs, and this period did not see the Roman state actually split up into four distinct sub-empires. Each emperor had his zone of influence within the Roman Empire, but little more, mainly high command in a 'war theater'. Each tetrarch was himself often in the field, while delegating most of the administration to the hierarchic bureaucracy headed by his respective Pretorian Prefect, each supervising several Vicarii, the governors-general in charge of another, lasting new administrative level, the civil diocese. For a listing of the provinces, now known as eparchy, within each quarter (known as a praetorian prefecture), see Roman province. In the West, the augustus Maximian controlled the provinces west of the Adriatic Sea and the Syrtis, and within that region his caesar, Constantius, controlled Gaul and Britain. In the East, the arrangements between the augustus Diocletian and his caesar, Galerius, were much more flexible. However, it appears that some contemporary and later writers, such as the Christian author Lactantius, and Sextus Aurelius Victor (who wrote about fifty years later and from uncertain sources), misunderstood the tetrarchic system in this respect, believing it to have involved a stricter division of territories among the four emperors. Public image[edit] Although power was shared in the tetrarchic system, the public image of the four emperors in the imperial college was carefully managed to give the appearance of a united empire (patrimonium indivisum). This was especially important after the numerous civil wars of the 3rd century. The tetrarchs appeared identical in all official portraits. Coinage dating from the tetrarchic period depicts every emperor with identical features—only the inscriptions on the coins indicate which one of the four emperors is being shown. The Byzantine sculpture Portrait of the Four Tetrarchs shows the tetrarchs again with identical features and wearing the same military costume. Military successes[edit] One of the greatest problems facing emperors in the Third Century Crisis was that they were only ever able to personally command troops on one front at any one time. While Aurelian and Probus were prepared to accompany their armies thousands of miles between war regions, this was not an ideal solution. Furthermore, it was risky for an emperor to delegate power in his absence to a subordinate general, who might win a victory and then be proclaimed as a rival emperor himself by his troops (which often happened). All members of the imperial college, on the other hand, were of essentially equal rank, despite two being senior emperors and two being junior; their functions and authorities were also equal. Under the Tetrarchy a number of important military victories were secured. Both the dyarchic and the tetrarchic system ensured that an emperor was near to every crisis area to personally direct and remain in control of campaigns simultaneously on more than just one front. After suffering a defeat by the Persians in 296, Galerius crushed Narseh in 298—reversing a series of Roman defeats throughout the century—capturing members of the imperial household and a substantial amount of booty and gaining a highly favourable peace treaty, which secured peace between the two powers for a generation. Similarly, Constantius defeated the British usurper Allectus, Maximian pacified the Gauls, and Diocletian crushed the revolt of Domitianus in Egypt. Demise[edit] Main article: Civil wars of the Tetrarchy When in 305 the 20-year term of Diocletian and Maximian ended, both abdicated. Their caesares, Galerius and Constantius Chlorus, were both raised to the rank of augustus, and two new caesares were appointed: Maximinus Daia (caesar to Galerius) and Valerius Severus (caesar to Constantius). These four formed the second tetrarchy. Constantine at the battle of the Milvian Bridge, fresco by Raphael, Vatican Rooms. However, the system broke down very quickly thereafter. When Constantius died in 306, Galerius promoted Severus to augustus while Constantine, Constantius' son, was proclaimed augustus by his father's troops. At the same time, Maxentius, the son of Maximian, who also resented being left out of the new arrangements, defeated Severus before forcing him to abdicate and then arranging his murder in 307. Maxentius and Maximian both then declared themselves augusti. By 308 there were therefore no fewer than four claimants to the rank of augustus (Galerius, Constantine, Maximian and Maxentius), and only one to that of caesar (Maximinus). In 308 Galerius, together with the retired emperor Diocletian and the supposedly retired Maximian, called an imperial "conference" at Carnuntum on the River Danube. The council agreed that Licinius would become augustus in the West, with Constantine as his caesar. In the East, Galerius remained augustus and Maximinus remained his caesar. Maximian was to retire, and Maxentius was declared a usurper. This agreement proved disastrous: by 308 Maxentius had become de facto ruler of Italy and Africa even without any imperial rank, and neither Constantine nor Maximinus—who had both been caesares since 306 and 305 respectively—were prepared to tolerate the promotion of the augustus Licinius as their superior. After an abortive attempt to placate both Constantine and Maximinus with the meaningless title filius augusti ("son of the augustus"), essentially an alternative title for caesar), they both had to be recognised as Augusti in 309. However, four full Augusti all at odds with each other did not bode well for the tetrarchic system. Between 309 and 313 most of the claimants to the imperial office died or were killed in various civil wars. Constantine forced Maximian's suicide in 310. Galerius died naturally in 311. Maxentius was defeated by Constantine at the Battle of the Milvian Bridge in 312 and subsequently killed. Maximinus committed suicide at Tarsus in 313 after being defeated in battle by Licinius. By 313, therefore, there remained only two emperors: Constantine in the West and Licinius in the East. The tetrarchic system was at an end, although it took until 324 for Constantine to finally defeat Licinius, reunite the two halves of the Roman Empire and declare himself sole augustus. Emperors[edit] Portrait Name Reign Co-ruler(s) Ref Diocletian CAIVS AVRELIVS VALERIVS DIOCLETIANVS (Whole, then East) 20 November 284– 1 May 305 (20 years, 5 months and 11 days) Maximian (caesar, 21 July 285–1 April 286; co-augustus, 286–1 May 305) Galerius (caesar, 21 March 293–1 May 305) Constantius I Chlorus (caesar, 1 March 293–1 May 305) [6] Maximian MARCVS AVRELIVS VALERIVS MAXIMIANVS HERCVLIVS (West) 1 April 286 – 1 May 305 (retired) end 306/early 307 – November 308 (19 years and 1 month) Diocletian (augustus, 21 July 285; co-augustus, 1 April 286–1 May 305) Galerius (caesar, 21 March 293–1 May 305) Constantius I Chlorus (caesar, 1 March 293–1 May 305) Maxentius (caesar, 28 October 306; junior co-augustus, April 307–November 308) Constantine I (rival augustus, 25 July 306; proclaimed junior co-augustus by Maximian, c. late summer 308) [6] Galerius CAIVS GALERIVS VALERIVS MAXIMIANVS (East) 1 May 305– 5 May 311 (6 years and 4 days) Diocletian (augustus, 21 March 293–1 May 305) Maximian (augustus, 21 March 293–1 May 305) Constantius I Chlorus (caesar, 1 March 293; co-augustus, 1 May 305–25 July 306) Valerius Severus (caesar, 1 May 305; co-augustus, August 306–April 307) Maxentius (caesar, 28 October 306; junior co-augustus, April 307–May 311) Licinius (designated augustus for the West, 11 November 308–311) Maximinus II (caesar, 1 May 305; co-augustus, 1 May 310–early May 311) [6] Constantius I Chlorus MARCVS FLAVIVS VALERIVS CONSTANTIVS HERCVLIVS (West) 1 May 305– 25 July 306 (1 year, 2 months and 24 days) Diocletian (augustus, 1 March 293–1 May 305) Maximian (augustus, 1 April 286–1 May 305) Galerius (caesar, 21 March 293; co-augustus, 1 May 305–25 July 306) Valerius Severus (caesar, 1 May 305 –July 306) Maximinus II (caesar, 1 May 305–25 July 306) [6] Valerius Severus (also Severus II) FLAVIVS VALERIVS SEVERVS (West) 25 July 306 – April 307 (<1 year) Galerius (augustus, 25 July 306–April 307) Maxentius (caesar, 28 October 306; rival augustus, c. April 307) Constantine I (rival augustus, 25 July 306–April 307) Maximinus II (caesar, 1 May 305–April 307) [6] Constantine I the Great FLAVIVS VALERIVS CONSTANTINVS (West) 25 July 306– 18 September 324 (18 years, 1 month and 25 days; later emperor of the entire empire 324–337) Maximian (rival augustus, late 306; senior co-augustus, c. late summer 308–November 308)Maxentius (caesar, 28 October 306; rival augustus, c. April 307–28 October 312) Licinius (rival augustus, 11 November 308–312; co-augustus, 313–314; rival augustus, 314–317; co-augustus, 317–321; rival augustus, 321–19 September 324) Crispus (caesar, 1 March 317–324) Constantine II (caesar, 1 March 317–324) Martinian (rival augustus, 324) [6] Maxentius MARCVS AVRELIVS VALERIVS MAXENTIVS (West) 28 October 306– 28 October 312 (6 years) Maximian (co-augustus, 306–308) Valerius Severus (rival augustus, August 306–April 307) Licinius (rival-augustus, 11 November 308–28 October 312) Constantine I (rival augustus, 25 July 306–28 October 312) [6] Licinius CAIVS VALERIVS LICINIANVS LICINIVS (West, then East) 11 November 308– 19 September 324 (15 years, 10 months and 8 days) Constantine I (rival augustus, 11 November 308–312; co-augustus, 313–314; rival augustus, 314–317; co-augustus, 317–321; rival augustus, 321–19 September 324) Valerius Valens (designated augustus for the West, 316–317) Licinius II (caesar, 1 March 317–324) Crispus (caesar, 1 March 317–324) Constantine II (caesar, 1 March 317–324) Martinian (designated augustus for the West, 324) [6] Maximinus II Daia CAIVS CALERIVS VALERIVS MAXIMINVS (East) 1 May 310 – summer 313 (2 years) Constantius I Chlorus (augustus, 1 May 305–25 July 306) Galerius (augustus, 1 May 305–25 July 311) Valerius Severus (caesar, 1 May 305–July 306) Maximian (augustus, late 306–November 308) Maxentius (rival caesar, 28 October 306; augustus, c. April 307; rival augustus, 1 May 310–28 October 312) Constantine I (augustus, 25 July 306; rival augustus, 1 May 310–313) Licinius (augustus, 11 November 308; rival augustus, 1 May 310–313) [6] Detailed timeline[edit] Diarchy 21 July 285 – 1 March 293 Western Roman Empire Eastern Roman Empire augustus Maximian (250-310) augustus Diocletian (244-311) Usurpers (date) Carausius (286-293) Roman Britain First Tetrarchy 1 March 293 - 1 May 305 Dioceses of Spain, Italy and Africa Dioceses of the East, Asia and Pontus augustus Maximian (250-310) augustus Diocletian (244-311) Dioceses of Gaul, Vienne and Britain Dioceses of Pannonia, Moesia and Thrace caesar Constantius Chlorus (250-306) caesar Galerius (250-311) Usurpers (date) Carausius (286-293) Roman Britain Allectus (293-296) Roman Britain Domitius Domitianus (297) Roman Egypt Achilleus (297-298) Roman Egypt Second Tetrarchy 1 May 305 – 25 July 306 Dioceses of Gaul, Vienne, Spain and Britain[7] Dioceses of Pannonia, Moesia, Thrace, Pontus and Asia[7] augustus Constantius Chlorus (250-306) augustus Galerius (250-311) Dioceses of Italy and Africa[7] Dioceses of the East[7] caesar Valerius Severus (?-307) caesar Maximinus Daia (270-313) Third Tetrarchy 25 July 306 – 16 August 307 Dioceses of Italy, Africa, Hispania and Pannonia[7] Dioceses of Moesia, Macedonia, Thrace, Pontus and Asia[7] augustus Valerius Severus (?-307) augustus Galerius (250-311) Dioceses of Britain, Vienne and Gaul[7] Diocesis of the East[7] caesar Constantine I (272-337) caesar Maximinus Daia (270-313) Usurpers (date) augustus Maxentius (306-312) firstly Rome, then Italy and Africa augustus Maximian (306-309) Italy and Africa Fourth Tetrarchy 16 August 307 – May 311 Dioceses of Gaul, Vienne, Hispania and Britain Dioceses of Moesia, Macedonia, Thrace, Pontus and Asia augustus Constantine I (272-337) augustus Galerius (250-311) Dioceses of Pannonia Dioceses of the East augustus Licinius (250-325) augustus Maximinus Daia (270-313) Dioceses of Italy and Africa augustus Maxentius (306-312) augustus Maximian (306-309) He broke with his son and took refuge in Arles under protection of Constantine. He later rebelled against Constantine and was compelled to commit suicide in 310 Usurpers(date) Domitius Alexander (309-311) in Africa against Maxentius Fifth Tetrarchy May 311 – August 313 Dioceses of Gaul, Vienne, Hispania, Britain (Italy and Africa)[8] Dioceses of Pannonia, Moesia, Macedonia and Thrace (Asia, Pontus and of the East)[9] augustus Constantine I (272-337) augustus Licinius (250-325) Dioceses de Italy and Africa Dioceses de Asia, Pontus and of the East augustus Maxentius (306-312) augustus Maximinus Daia (270-313) Last Tetrarchy August 313 – 18 September 324 Dioceses of Gaul, Vienne, Hispania, Britain, Italy and Africa (Pannonia, Moesia and Macedonia)[10] Dioceses of Pannonia, Moesia, Macedonia, Thrace, Asia, Pontus and of the East augustus Constantine I (272-337) augustus Licinius (250-325) Western Roman Empire Eastern Roman Empire caesar Crispus (305-326) he was proclaimed by his father Constantine in 317 caesar Constantine II (317-337) he was proclaimed by his father Constantine in 317 augustus Valerius Valens (?-317) co-emperor with Licinius in Pannonia, elevated as Augustus by Licinius, but he had Valens executed caesar Licinius II (316-326) he was raised to the rank of Caesar by his father Licinius in 317 augustus Martinianus (?-325) nominal co-emperor with Licinius in 324 Simplified timeline[edit] Tetrarchy until 1 May 305[edit] West East augusti Maximian Diocletian caesares Constantius Chlorus Galerius Tetrarchy until July 306[edit] After the retirement of the two Augusti both previous caesares succeeded them, and two new caesares were appointed. Maximinus Daia was Galerius' nephew. West East augusti Constantius Chlorus Galerius caesares Severus Maximinus Daia Tetrarchy until 16 May 307[edit] After the death of Constantius his legions proclaim his son Constantine the new augustus, but Galerius elevates Severus to be the new junior augustus and compensates Constantine with the rank of caesar. West East augusti Severus Galerius caesares Constantine Maximinus Daia Tetrarchy from 18 November 308 to the beginning of May 311[edit] After the death of Severus, Constantine does not succeed him. At the council of Carnutum, Diocletian decides that Licinius will be the new augustus of the West. West East augusti Licinius Galerius caesares Constantine Maximinus Daia Tetrarchy from May 311[edit] After the death of Galerius he was succeeded by Maximinus Daia in as augustus of the East, but is crowded by Licinius, who wants to have the status of the senior augustus. Maximinus appoints no new caesar, although it was assumed that this position should later on be filled out with the son of Severus, Flavius Severianus, or at least that he was scheduled for this position. West East augusti Licinius Maximinus Daia caesares Constantine vacant Tetrarchy after 8 October 316 to the end of 316[edit] Shortly before the turn of the year 316/317, Constantine, now augustus in the West, appointed a caesar, while Licinius briefly appointed one of his officers, Valerius Valens, as the third augustus. This was apparent from coins, though Valens was apparently inferior to Licinius, who soon executed him. Even the chronology is unclear, as the date stamping could also be the turn of the year 314/315. West East augusti Constantine Licinius and Valerius Valens caesares Bassianus Tetrarchy from 1 March 317 to 18 September 324[edit] The tetrarchic system is at its end. Both Augusti appoint their own sons as co-emperors, restoring a dynastic system. However, before his death, Licinius appoints the General Martinianus on 3 July 324 as augustus in name only, as Martinianus was intended to replace Constantine in the west. West East augusti Constantine I Licinius caesares Crispus and Constantine II Licinius II Legacy[edit] Although the tetrarchic system as such only lasted until 313, many aspects of it survived. The fourfold regional division of the empire continued in the form of Praetorian prefectures, each of which was overseen by a praetorian prefect and subdivided into administrative dioceses, and often reappeared in the title of the military supra-provincial command assigned to a magister militum. The pre-existing notion of consortium imperii, the sharing of imperial power, and the notion that an associate to the throne was the designated successor (possibly conflicting with the notion of hereditary claim by birth or adoption), was to reappear repeatedly. The idea of the two halves, the east and the west, re-emerged and eventually resulted in the permanent de facto division into two separate Roman empires after the death of Theodosius I, though it is important to remember that the empire was never formally divided, the emperors of the eastern and western halves legally ruling as one imperial college until the fall of Rome's western empire left Byzantium, the "second Rome", sole direct heir. Other examples[edit] Part of a series of articles on Monarchy Central concepts Monarch Monarchism Imperialism Divine right of kings Mandate of Heaven Types Absolute Chinese Legalist Composite Constitutional Crowned republic Diarchy Dual Elective Emirate Ethnarch Federal Hereditary Personal union Non-sovereign Popular Regency Coregency Tetrarch Triarchy Universal History Birth of the Roman Empire Magna Carta Foundation of the Ottoman Empire Glorious Revolution French Revolution Trienio Liberal First French Empire Liberal Wars Second French Empire Italian unification Meiji Restoration Austro-Hungarian Compromise German unification 5 October 1910 Revolution Proclamation of the Republic in Brazil Chinese Revolution Russian Revolution Siamese revolution of 1932 Birth of the Italian Republic Spanish transition to democracy Iranian Revolution Modern Cambodia Nepalese Civil War Related topics Aristocracy Nobility Autocracy Chamberlain Conservatism Despotism Dynasty List Enlightened absolutism Thomas Hobbes Legitimists Orléanist Oligarchy Peerage Philosopher king Primogeniture Rank Royalism Regicide Regnal number Royal family Style Ultra-royalist Politics portal v t e Tetrarchies in the ancient world existed in both Thessaly (in northern Greece) and Galatia (in central Asia Minor; including Lycaonia) as well as among the British Cantiaci. The constellation of Jewish principalities in the Herodian kingdom of Judea was known as a tetrarchy; see Tetrarchy (Judea). In the novel The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe, the Pevensie siblings rule Narnia as a tetrarchy of two kings and two queens. See also[edit] Notitia dignitatum, a later document from the imperial chancery Problem of two emperors – A problem arising when multiple people claim the title of emperor Notes[edit] ^ Historian David Potter translates the term as "gang of four". See idem., Constantine the Emperor (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), 1. Citations[edit] ^ Qtd. and tr. Leadbetter, Galerius, 3. ^ Amm. Marc. 14.11.10; Jul. Caes. 315A-B. ^ Leadbetter, Galerius, 3. ^ Leadbetter, Galerius, 3–4. ^ The chronology has been thoroughly established by Kolb, Diocletian, and Kuhoff, Diokletian. ^ a b c d e f g h i Cooley, Alison E. (2012). "Imperial titles, Augustus–Justinian (Appendix 2)". The Cambridge Manual of Latin Epigraphy. pp. 488–509. doi:10.1017/cbo9781139020442.007. Retrieved 2020-06-26. ^ a b c d e f g h Bajo, F. (1990) Constantino y sus sucesores. La conversión del Imperio. Akal Historia del mundo antiguo, pág 9 ^ after defeating Maxentius in 312 ^ A partir de derrotar a Maximino Daya ^ After defeating Licinius in 317 References[edit] Barnes, Timothy D. (1984). Constantine and Eusebius. Harvard University Press. ISBN 0-674-16531-4. Bowman, Alan (2005). The Cambridge Ancient History Volume 12, The Crisis of Empire, AD 193–337. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-30199-8. Corcoran, Simon (2000). The Empire of the Tetrarchs, Imperial Pronouncements and Government AD 284–324. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-815304-X. Kolb, Frank (2011-07-11). Diocletian und die Erste Tetrarchie: Improvisation oder Experiment in der Organisation monarchischer Herrschaft? (in German). Berlin: de Gruyter. ISBN 9783110846508. Kuhoff, Wolfgang (2001). Diokletian und die Epoche der Tetrarchie: Das römische Reich zwischen Krisenbewältigung und Neuaufbau (284-313 n. CHR.). Frankfurt am Main: Lang. ISBN 9783631367926. Leadbetter, William Lewis (2009-12-04). Galerius and the Will of Diocletian. London, New York: Routledge. ISBN 9781135261320. Rees, Roger (2004). Diocletian and the Tetrarchy. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press. ISBN 9780748616602. External links[edit] Wikimedia Commons has media related to Tetrarchy. A detailed chronology of the tetrarchy from Diocletian to Constantine A chart showing the tetrarchy from Diocletian to Constantine v t e Roman emperors by epoch List of Roman emperors Roman Empire Family tree Early Principate Crisis of the Third Century Dominate Western Roman Empire and the Middle Ages Julio-Claudian dynasty (27 BC–68 AD) Year of the 4 Emperors (68–69) Flavian dynasty (69–96) Nerva–Antonine dynasty (96–192) Year of the 5 Emperors (192–193) Severan dynasty (193–235) Year of the 6 Emperors (238) Gordian dynasty (238–244) Illyrian emperors (268–284) Gallic emperors (260–274) Britannic emperors (286–297) Tetrarchies (293–313) Constantinian dynasty (305–363) Valentinianic dynasty (364–392) Theodosian dynasty (378–455) Western Roman emperors (395–476) Eastern Roman/Byzantine emperors (395–1453) Emperors of Nicaea (1204–1261) Emperors of Trebizond (1204–1461) Emperors/Despots of Thessalonica (1224–1246) Latin emperors (1204–1261) Holy Roman emperors (800–1806) v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tetrarchy&oldid=995436227" Categories: Tetrarchy 293 establishments 313 disestablishments 290s establishments in the Roman Empire 310s disestablishments in the Roman Empire 3rd century in the Roman Empire 4th century in the Roman Empire States and territories established in the 290s States and territories disestablished in the 4th century Constitutional state types Emperors Forms of government Monarchy Oligarchy 290s in the Roman Empire Roman emperors Hidden categories: Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata Articles lacking in-text citations from May 2012 All articles lacking in-text citations Articles containing Greek-language text CS1 German-language sources (de) Commons category link is on Wikidata Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Languages Afrikaans العربية Asturianu Azərbaycanca Български Català Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français Frysk Galego 한국어 Հայերեն Hrvatski Ido Bahasa Indonesia Italiano עברית ქართული Latina Lietuvių Lingua Franca Nova Magyar Македонски Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Norsk nynorsk Occitan Polski Português Română Русский Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Tagalog ไทย Türkçe Українська Tiếng Việt 文言 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 21 December 2020, at 01:05 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2001 ---- Pindar - Wikipedia Pindar From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search For other uses, see Pindar (disambiguation). Ancient Greek lyric poet from Thebes Pindar Pindar, Roman copy of Greek 5th century BC bust (Museo Archeologico Nazionale, Naples) Native name Πίνδαρος Born c. 518 [1] Cynoscephalae, Boiotia Died c. 438 (aged approx 80) Argos Occupation Lyric poet Genre Poetry Pindar (/ˈpɪndər/; Greek: Πίνδαρος Pindaros, [píndaros]; Latin: Pindarus; c. 518 – 438 BC) was an Ancient Greek lyric poet from Thebes. Of the canonical nine lyric poets of ancient Greece, his work is the best preserved. Quintilian wrote, "Of the nine lyric poets, Pindar is by far the greatest, in virtue of his inspired magnificence, the beauty of his thoughts and figures, the rich exuberance of his language and matter, and his rolling flood of eloquence, characteristics which, as Horace rightly held, make him inimitable."[2] His poems can also, however, seem difficult and even peculiar. The Athenian comic playwright Eupolis once remarked that they "are already reduced to silence by the disinclination of the multitude for elegant learning".[3] Some scholars in the modern age also found his poetry perplexing, at least until the 1896 discovery of some poems by his rival Bacchylides; comparisons of their work showed that many of Pindar's idiosyncrasies are typical of archaic genres rather than of only the poet himself. His poetry, while admired by critics, still challenges the casual reader and his work is largely unread among the general public.[4] Pindar was the first Greek poet to reflect on the nature of poetry and on the poet's role.[5] Like other poets of the Archaic Age, he has a profound sense of the vicissitudes of life, but he also articulates a passionate faith in what men can achieve by the grace of the gods, most famously expressed in the conclusion to one of his Victory Odes:[6] Creatures of a day! What is anyone? What is anyone not? A dream of a shadow Is our mortal being. But when there comes to men A gleam of splendour given of heaven, Then rests on them a light of glory And blessed are their days. (Pythian 8)[7][8] His poetry illustrates the beliefs and values of Archaic Greece at the dawn of the classical period.[9] Contents 1 Biography 1.1 Sources 1.2 Life 1.2.1 Infancy to adulthood 1.2.2 Middle age 1.2.3 Old age and death 1.2.4 Post mortem 1.3 Values and beliefs 2 Works 2.1 Victory odes 2.1.1 Style 2.1.2 Structure 2.1.3 Chronological order 2.2 Manuscripts, shreds and quotes 3 Influence and legacy 3.1 Horace's tribute 3.2 Bowra's tribute 4 See also 5 Notes 6 References 7 Sources 8 Further reading 9 External links Biography[edit] Sources[edit] Five ancient sources contain all the recorded details of Pindar's life. One of them is a short biography discovered in 1961 on an Egyptian papyrus dating from at least 200 AD (P.Oxy.2438).[10] The other four are collections that weren't finalized until some 1600 years after his death: Commentaries on Pindar by Eustathius of Thessalonica; Vita Vratislavensis, found in a manuscript at Breslau, author unknown; a text by Thomas Magister; some meagre writings attributed to the lexicographer Suidas. Although these sources are based on a much older literary tradition, going as far back as Chamaeleon of Heraclea in the 4th century BC, they are generally viewed with scepticism today: much of the material is clearly fanciful.[11][12] Scholars both ancient and modern have turned to Pindar's own work – his victory odes in particular – as a source of biographical information: some of the poems touch on historic events and can be accurately dated. The 1962 publication of Elroy Bundy's ground-breaking work Studia Pindarica[13] led to a change in scholarly opinion—the Odes were no longer seen as expressions of Pindar's personal thoughts and feelings, but rather as public statements "dedicated to the single purpose of eulogizing men and communities."[14] It has been claimed that biographical interpretations of the poems are due to a "fatal conjunction" of historicism and Romanticism.[15] In other words, we know almost nothing about Pindar's life based on either traditional sources or his own poems. However, the pendulum of intellectual fashion has begun to change direction again, and cautious use of the poems for some biographical purposes is considered acceptable once more.[16][17][18][19] πολλὰ γὰρ πολλᾷ λέλεκται: νεαρὰ δ᾽ ἐξευ- ρόντα δόμεν βασάνῳ ἐς ἔλεγχον, ἅπας κίνδυνος.[20][21] Story is vast in range: new ways to find and test upon the touchstone, Here danger lies.[nb 1][22] Life[edit] Infancy to adulthood[edit] Pindar was born in circa 518 BC (the 65th Olympiad) in Cynoscephalae, a village in Boeotia, not far from Thebes. His father's name is variously given as Daiphantus, Pagondas or Scopelinus, and his mother's name was Cleodice.[11] It is told that he was stung on the mouth by a bee in his youth and this was the reason he became a poet of honey-like verses (an identical fate has been ascribed to other poets of the archaic period). Pindar was about twenty years old in 498 BC when he was commissioned by the ruling family in Thessaly to compose his first victory ode (Pythian 10). He studied the art of lyric poetry in Athens, where his tutor was Lasos of Hermione, and he is also said to have received some helpful criticism from Corinna. The early-to-middle years of Pindar's career coincided with the Greco-Persian Wars during the reigns of Darius and Xerxes. This period included the first Persian invasion of Greece, which ending at the Battle of Marathon in 490 BC, and second Persian invasion of Greece (480-479 BC).[23][24] During the second invasion, when Pindar was almost forty years old, Thebes was occupied by Xerxes' general, Mardonius, who with many Theban aristocrats subsequently perished at the Battle of Plataea. It is possible that Pindar spent much of this time at Aegina. His choice of residence during the earlier invasion in 490 BC is not known, but he was able to attend the Pythian Games for that year, where he first met the Sicilian prince, Thrasybulus, nephew of Theron of Acragas. Thrasybulus had driven the winning chariot and he and Pindar were to form a lasting friendship, paving the way for his subsequent visit to Sicily. Middle age[edit] Pindar seems to have used his odes to advance his, and his friends', personal interests.[25] In 462 BC he composed two odes in honour of Arcesilas, king of Cyrene, (Pythians 4 and 5), pleading for the return from exile of a friend, Demophilus. In the latter ode Pindar proudly mentions his own ancestry, which he shared with the king, as an Aegeid or descendant of Aegeus, the legendary king of Athens. The clan was influential in many parts of the Greek world, having intermarried with ruling families in Thebes, in Lacedaemonia, and in cities that claimed Lacedaemonian descent, such as Cyrene and Thera. The historian Herodotus considered the clan important enough to deserve mention (Histories IV.147). Membership of this clan possibly contributed to Pindar's success as a poet, and it informed his political views, which are marked by a conservative preference for oligarchic governments of the Doric kind. "Pindar might not actually claim to be an Aegeid since his 'I' statements do not necessarily refer to himself. The Aegeid clan did however have a branch in Thebes, and his reference to 'my ancestors' in Pythian 5 could have been spoken on behalf of both Arcesilas and himself – he may have used this ambivalence to establish a personal link with his patrons."[26] He was possibly the Theban proxenos or consul for Aegina and/or Molossia, as indicated in another of his odes, Nemean 7,[27][28][29][30] in which he glorifies Neoptolemus, a national hero of Aegina and Molossia. According to tradition, Neoptolemus died disgracefully in a fight with priests at the temple in Delphi over their share of some sacrificial meat. Pindar diplomatically glosses over this and concludes mysteriously with an earnest protestation of innocence – "But shall my heart never admit that I with words none can redeem dishonoured Neoptolemus".[clarification needed] Possibly he was responding to anger among Aeginetans and/or Molossians over his portrayal of Neoptolemus in an earlier poem, Paean 6, which had been commissioned by the priests at Delphi and which depicted the hero's death in traditional terms, as divine retribution for his crimes. "Some doubt this biographical interpretation of Nemean 7 since it is largely based on marginal comments by scholiasts and Pindaric scholiasts are often unreliable. The fact that Pindar gave different versions of the myth may simply reflect the needs of different genres, and does not necessarily indicate a personal dilemma.[31] Nemean 7 in fact is the most controversial and obscure of Pindar's victory odes, and scholars ancient and modern have been ingenious and imaginative in their attempts to explain it, so far with no agreed success."[32] In his first Pythian ode, composed in 470 BC in honour of the Sicilian tyrant Hieron, Pindar celebrated a series of victories by Greeks against foreign invaders: Athenian and Spartan-led victories against Persia at Salamis and Plataea, and victories by the western Greeks led by Theron of Acragas and Hieron against the Carthaginians and Etruscans at the battles of Himera and Cumae. Such celebrations were not appreciated by his fellow Thebans: they had sided with the Persians and had incurred many losses and privations as a result of their defeat. His praise of Athens with such epithets as bulwark of Hellas (fragment 76) and city of noble name and sunlit splendour (Nemean 5) induced the authorities in Thebes to fine him 5000 drachmae, to which the Athenians are said to have responded with a gift of 10000 drachmae. According to another account,[33] the Athenians even made him their proxenus or consul in Thebes. His association with the fabulously rich Hieron was another source of annoyance at home. It was probably in response to Theban sensitivities over this issue that he denounced the rule of tyrants (i.e. rulers like Hieron) in an ode composed shortly after a visit to Hieron's sumptuous court in 476–75 BC (Pythian 11).[34] "Pindar's actual phrasing in Pythian 11 was "I deplore the lot of tyrants" and though this was traditionally interpreted as an apology for his dealings with Sicilian tyrants like Hieron, an alternative date for the ode has led some scholars to conclude that it was in fact a covert reference to the tyrannical behaviour of the Athenians, although this interpretation is ruled out if we accept the earlier note about covert references. According to yet another interpretation Pindar is simply delivering a formulaic warning to the successful athlete to avoid hubris.[17] It is highly unlikely that Pindar ever acted for Athenians as their proxenus or consul in Thebes."[35] Lyric verse was conventionally accompanied by music and dance, and Pindar himself wrote the music and choreographed the dances for his victory odes. Sometimes he trained the performers at his home in Thebes, and sometimes he trained them at the venue where they performed. Commissions took him to all parts of the Greek world – to the Panhellenic festivals in mainland Greece (Olympia, Delphi, Corinth and Nemea), westwards to Sicily, eastwards to the seaboard of Asia Minor, north to Macedonia and Abdera (Paean 2) and south to Cyrene on the African coast. Other poets at the same venues vied with him for the favours of patrons. His poetry sometimes reflects this rivalry. For example, Olympian 2 and Pythian 2, composed in honour of the Sicilian tyrants Theron and Hieron following his visit to their courts in 476–75 BC, refer respectively to ravens and an ape, apparently signifying rivals who were engaged in a campaign of smears against him – possibly the poets Simonides and his nephew Bacchylides.[36] Pindar's original treatment of narrative myth, often relating events in reverse chronological order, is said to have been a favourite target for criticism.[37] Simonides was known to charge high fees for his work and Pindar is said to have alluded to this in Isthmian 2, where he refers to the Muse as "a hireling journeyman". He appeared in many poetry competitions and was defeated five times by his compatriot, the poet Corinna, in revenge of which he called her Boeotian sow in one of his odes (Olympian 6. 89f.). "It was assumed by ancient sources that Pindar's odes were performed by a chorus, but this has been challenged by some modern scholars, who argue that the odes were in fact performed solo.[38] It is not known how commissions were arranged, nor if the poet travelled widely: even when poems include statements like "I have come" it is not certain that this was meant literally.[39] Uncomplimentary references to Bacchylides and Simonides were found by scholiasts but there is no reason to accept their interpretation of the odes.[40] In fact, some scholars have interpreted the allusions to fees in Isthmian 2 as a request by Pindar for payment of fees owed to himself.[41] His defeats by Corinna were probably invented by ancient commentators to account for the Boeotian sow remark, a phrase moreover that was completely misunderstood by scholiasts, since Pindar was scoffing at a reputation that all Boeotians had for stupidity."[42] Old age and death[edit] His fame as a poet drew Pindar into Greek politics. Athens, the most important city in Greece throughout his poetic career, was a rival of his home city, Thebes, and also of the island state Aegina, whose leading citizens commissioned about a quarter of his Victory Odes. There is no open condemnation of the Athenians in any of his poems but criticism is implied. For example, the victory ode mentioned above (Pythian 8) describes the downfall of the giants Porphyrion and Typhon and this might be Pindar's way of covertly celebrating a recent defeat of Athens by Thebes at the Battle of Coronea (447 BC).[43] The poem ends with a prayer for Aegina's freedom, long threatened by Athenian ambitions. Covert criticism of Athens (traditionally located in odes such as Pythian 8, Nemean 8 and Isthmian 7) is now dismissed as highly unlikely, even by scholars who allow some biographical and historical interpretations of the poems.[44] One of his last odes (Pythian 8) indicates that he lived near a shrine to the oracle Alcmaeon and that he stored some of his wealth there. In the same ode he says that he had recently received a prophecy from Alcmaeon during a journey to Delphi ("...he met me and proved the skills of prophecy that all his race inherit")[45] but he does not reveal what the long-dead prophet said to him nor in what form he appeared.[nb 2] The ode was written to commemorate a victory by an athlete from Aegina. "Pindar doesn't necessarily mean himself when he uses the first person singular. Many of his 'I' statements are generic, indicating somebody engaged in the role of a singer i.e. a 'bardic' I. Other 'I' statements articulate values typical of the audience, and some are spoken on behalf of the subjects celebrated in the poems.[46] The 'I' that received the prophecy in Pythian 8 therefore might have been the athlete from Aegina, not Pindar. In that case the prophecy must have been about his performance at the Pythian Games, and the property stored at the shrine was just a votive offering."[47] Nothing is recorded about Pindar's wife and son except their names, Megacleia and Daiphantus. About ten days before he died, the goddess Persephone appeared to him and complained that she was the only divinity to whom he had never composed a hymn. She said he would come to her soon and compose one then. Pindar lived to about eighty years of age. He died around 438 BC while attending a festival at Argos. His ashes were taken back home to Thebes by his musically-gifted daughters, Eumetis and Protomache. Post mortem[edit] One of Pindar's female relatives claimed that he dictated some verses to her in honour of Persephone after he had been dead for several days. Some of Pindar's verses were inscribed in letters of gold on a temple wall in Lindos, Rhodes. At Delphi, where he had been elected a priest of Apollo, the priests exhibited an iron chair on which he used to sit during the festival of the Theoxenia. Every night, while closing the temple doors, they intoned: "Let Pindar the poet go unto the supper of the gods!" Pindar's house in Thebes became one of the city's landmarks. When Alexander the Great demolished Thebes in 335 BC, as punishment for its resistance to Macedonian expansionism, he ordered the house be left intact out of gratitude for verses praising his ancestor, Alexander I of Macedon.[48] Values and beliefs[edit] Pindar's values and beliefs have been inferred from his poetry. No other ancient Greek poet has left so many comments about the nature of his art. He justified and exalted choral poetry at a time when society was turning away from it. It "...had for two centuries reflected and shaped the sentiments, the outlook, and the convictions of the Greek aristocracies...and Pindar spoke up for it with passionate assurance".[49] His poetry is a meeting ground for gods, heroes and men – even the dead are spoken of as participants: "Deep in the earth their heart listens".[50] His view of the gods is traditional but more self-consistent than Homer's and more reverent. He never depicts gods in a demeaning role. He seems indifferent to the intellectual reforms that were shaping the theology of the times. Thus an eclipse is not a mere physical effect, as contemplated by early thinkers such as Thales, Anaximander and Heraclitus, nor was it even a subject for bold wonder, as it was for an earlier poet, Archilochus;[51] instead Pindar treated an eclipse as a portent of evil.[nb 3][52][53] Gods are the embodiment of power, uncompromisingly proud of their nature and violent in defense of their privileges.[54][55] There is some rationalization of religious belief, but it is within a tradition at least as old as Hesiod, where abstractions are personified, such as "Truth the daughter of Zeus".[56] Sometimes the wording suggests a belief in 'God' rather than 'a god' (e.g. "What is God? Everything"),[nb 4] but the implications are not given full expression and the poems are not examples of monotheism.[citation needed] Nor do they vocalize a belief in Fate as the background to the gods, unlike the plays of Aeschylus for example. Pindar subjects both fortune and fate to divine will (e.g. "child of Zeus...Fortune").[57][53][58][59][60] A short Heracles: Pindar once ignored the traditional image of Heracles, the supreme example of the heroic physique, and described him as short in order to compare him with a short patron. He selects and revises traditional myths so as not to diminish the dignity and majesty of the gods. Such revisionism was not unique. Xenophanes had castigated Homer and Hesiod for the misdeeds they ascribed to gods, such as theft, adultery and deception, and Pythagoras had envisioned those two poets being punished in Hades for blasphemy. A subtle example of Pindar's approach can be found in his treatment of the myth of Apollo's rape of the nymph Cyrene.[61] As the god of the Delphic oracle, Apollo is all-knowing, yet in keeping with his anthropomorphic nature he seeks information about the nymph from a third party, in this case the centaur Chiron. Chiron however affirms the god's omniscience with an elegant compliment, as if Apollo had only pretended to be ignorant: "You, Sire, who know the appointed end of all, and all paths..."[nb 5][62] Apollo's abduction of the nymph is not presented as a shameful act. Pindar's gods are above such ethical issues and it is not for men to judge them by ordinary human standards. Indeed, the finest breeds of men resulted from divine passions: "For Pindar a mortal woman who is loved by a god is an outstanding lesson in divine favours handsomely bestowed".[63][64] Being descendants of divine unions with privileged mortals, mythical heroes are an intermediate group between gods and men, and they are sympathetic to human ambitions. Thus, for example, Pindar not only invokes Zeus for help on behalf of the island of Aegina but also its national heroes Aeacus, Peleus and Telamon.[65] Unlike the gods, however, heroes can be judged according to ordinary human standards and they are sometimes shown in the poems to demean themselves. Even in that case, they receive special consideration. Thus Pindar refers obliquely to the murder of Phocus by his brothers Peleus and Telamon ("I am shy of speaking of a huge risk, hazarded not in right"), telling the audience that he will not talk of it ("silence is a man's wisest counsel").[nb 6][66][67] The Theban hero Heracles was a favourite subject but in one poem he is depicted as small in order to be compared with a small Theban patron who had won the pankration at the Isthmian Games:[68] a unique example of Pindar's readiness to shape traditional myths to fit the occasion, even if not always flattering to the mythical hero. A hero's status is not diminished by an occasional blemish but rests on a summary view of his heroic exploits.[69][70][71] Some of his patrons claimed divine descent, such as Diagoras of Rhodes, but Pindar makes all men akin to gods if they realize their full potential: their innate gifts are divinely bestowed, and even then success still depends on the gods' active favour. In honouring such men, therefore, Pindar was honouring the gods too.[72][66][73] His statements about life after death were not self-consistent but that was typical for the times. Traditional ambivalence, as expressed by Homer, had been complicated by a growth of religious sects, such as the Eleusinian mysteries and Pythagoreanism, representing various schemes of rewards and punishments in the next life. However, for the poet, glory and lasting fame were men's greatest assurance of a life well-lived.[74] He presents no theory of history apart from the view that Fortune is variable even for the best men, an outlook suited to moderation in success, courage in adversity. Notions of 'good' and 'bad' in human nature were not analysed by him in any depth nor did he arrive at anything like the compassionate ethics of his near contemporary, Simonides of Ceos.[75][76][77] His poems are indifferent to the ordinary mass of people. They are dismissed with phrases such as "the brute multitude" (Pythian Ode 2.87). Nor are the poems concerned with the fate of rich and powerful men once they lose their wealth and social status (compared for example with the bitter and disillusioned poems of Theognis of Megara). They are more interested in what successful men do with their good fortune: success brings obligations, and religious and artistic activities need patrons.[78][79][80][81] Whereas the Muses inspired Homer with relevant information and with the language to express it, Pindar seems to receive only their inspiration: his role is to shape that inspiration with his own wisdom and skill. Like his patrons, whom he immortalizes in verse, he owes his success to hard work as well as to innate gifts; though he hires himself out, he has a vocation. The Muses are to him as an oracle is to a prophet, and lesser poets are to him as ravens are to an eagle; the art of such men is as hackneyed as garland-making; his is magical:[82][83][84][85] εἴρειν στεφάνους ἐλαφρόν: ἀναβάλεο: Μοῖσά τοι κολλᾷ χρυσὸν ἔν τε λευκὸν ἐλέφανθ᾽ ἁμᾷ καὶ λείριον ἄνθεμον ποντίας ὑφελοῖσ᾽ ἐέρσας. To plait garlands is easy. Strike up! The Muse Welds together gold and white ivory And the lily-flower snatched from the sea's dew.[86][87] Works[edit] Pindar's strongly individual genius is apparent in all his extant compositions but, unlike Simonides and Stesichorus for example, he created no new lyrical genres.[88] He was however innovative in his use of the genres he inherited – for example, in one of his victory odes (Olympian 3), he announces his invention of a new type of musical accompaniment, combining lyre, flute and human voice (though our knowledge of Greek music is too sketchy to allow us to understand the full nature of this innovation).[89] Although he probably spoke Boeotian Greek he composed in a literary language that tended to rely more on the Doric dialect than his rival Bacchylides, but less insistently than Alcman. There is an admixture of other dialects, especially Aeolic and epic forms, and an occasional use of some Boeotian words.[90] He composed 'choral' songs yet it is by no means certain that they were all sung by choirs – the use of choirs is testified only by the generally unreliable scholiasts.[91] Scholars at the Library of Alexandria collected his compositions in seventeen books organized according to genre:[92] 1 book of hymnoi – "hymns" 1 book of paianes – "paeans" 2 books of dithyramboi – "dithyrambs" 2 books of prosodia – "processionals" 3 books of parthenia – "songs for maidens" 2 books of hyporchemata – "songs for light dances" 1 book of enkomia – "songs of praise" 1 book of threnoi – "laments" 4 books of epinikia – "victory odes" Of this vast and varied corpus, only the epinikia – odes written to commemorate athletic victories – survive in complete form; the rest survive only by quotations in other ancient authors or from papyrus scraps unearthed in Egypt. Even in fragmentary form however they reveal the same complexity of thought and language that are found in the victory odes.[93] Dionysius of Halicarnassus singled out Pindar's work as an outstanding example of austere style (αὐστηρὰ ἁρμονία) but he noted its absence in the maiden songs or parthenia. One surviving fragment of a maiden song does seem to be different in tone, due however to the fact that it is spoken in the character of a girl:[94][95][96] ἐμὲ δὲ πρέπει παρθενήια μὲν φρονεῖν γλώσσᾳ τε λέγεσθαι. emè dè prépei parthenḗia mèn phroneîn glṓssāi te légesthai. I must think maidenly thoughts And utter them with my tongue.[96][53][97][98] Enough of his dithyrambic poetry survives for comparison with that of Bacchylides, who used it for narrative. Pindar's dithyrambs are an exuberant display of religious feeling, capturing the wild spirit of Dionysus and pointing forward to the ecstatic songs of Euripides' Bacchae. In one of these, dedicated to the Athenians and written to be sung in Spring, he depicts the divine energy of the revitalized world.[99][100] φοινικοεάνων ὁπότ' οἰχθέντος Ὡρᾶν θαλάμου εὔοδμον ἐπάγοισιν ἐάρ φυτὰ νεκτάρεα. τότε βάλλεται, τότ' ἐπ' ἀμβρόταν χθόν' ἐραταί ἴων φόβαι, ῥόδα τε κόμαισι μείγνυται, ἀχεῖ τ' ὀμφαὶ μελέων σὺν αὐλοῖς οἰχνεῖ τε Σεμέλαν ἑλικάμπυκα χοροί. phoinikoeánōn hopót' oikhthéntos Hōrân thalámou eúodmon epágoisin eár phutà nektárea. tóte bálletai, tót' ep' ambrótan khthón' erataí íōn phóbai, rhóda te kómaisi meígnutai, akheî t' omphaì meléōn sùn auloîs oikhneî te Semélan helikámpuka khoroí. When the chamber of the scarlet-clothed Hours is opened And the nectareous flowers usher in the fragrant spring, Then are scattered, then, on the immortal ground The lovely petals of violets; roses are wound in our hair; Loudly echo the voices of songs to the flutes, And choirs step in procession to dark-ribboned Semele.[100][101][87][102][103][104][105] Victory odes[edit] The so-called 'Farnese Diadumenos' is a Roman copy of a Greek original attributed to Polykleitos c. 440 BC, depicting an athlete tying a victory ribbon round his head. Almost all Pindar's victory odes are celebrations of triumphs gained by competitors in Panhellenic festivals such as the Olympian Games. The establishment of these athletic and musical festivals was among the greatest achievements of the Greek aristocracies. Even in the 5th century BC, when there was an increased tendency towards professionalism, they were predominantly aristocratic assemblies, reflecting the expense and leisure needed to attend such events either as a competitor or spectator. Attendance was an opportunity for display and self-promotion, and the prestige of victory, requiring commitment in time and/or wealth, went far beyond anything that accrues to athletic victories today, even in spite of the modern preoccupation with sport.[106] Pindar's odes capture something of the prestige and the aristocratic grandeur of the moment of victory, as in this stanza from one of his Isthmian Odes, here translated by Geoffrey S. Conway: If ever a man strives With all his soul's endeavour, sparing himself Neither expense nor labour to attain True excellence, then must we give to those Who have achieved the goal, a proud tribute Of lordly praise, and shun All thoughts of envious jealousy. To a poet's mind the gift is slight, to speak A kind word for unnumbered toils, and build For all to share a monument of beauty. (Isthmian I, antistrophe 3)[107] His victory odes are grouped into four books named after the Olympian, Pythian, Isthmian, and Nemean Games – Panhellenic festivals held respectively at Olympia, Delphi, Corinth and Nemea. This reflects the fact that most of the odes were composed in honour of boys, youths, and men who had recently enjoyed victories in athletic (and sometimes musical) contests at those festivals. In a few odes however much older victories, and even victories in lesser games, are celebrated, often as a pretext for addressing other issues or achievements. For example, Pythian 3, composed in honour of Hieron of Syracuse, briefly mentions a victory he had once enjoyed at the Pythian Games, but it is actually intended to console him for his chronic illness (similarly, Pythian 2 is like a private letter in its intimacy).[108] Nemean 9 and Nemean 10 celebrate victories in games at Sicyon and Argos, and Nemean 11 celebrates a victory in a municipal election on Tenedos (though it also mentions some obscure athletic victories). These three odes are the final odes in the Nemean book of odes, and there is a reason for their inclusion. In the original manuscripts, the four books of odes were arranged in the order of importance assigned to the festivals, with the Nemean festival, considered least important, coming last. Victory odes that lacked a Panhellenic subject were then bundled together at the end of the book of Nemean odes.[109] Style[edit] Pindar's poetic style is very distinctive, even when the peculiarities of the genre are set aside. The odes typically feature a grand and arresting opening, often with an architectural metaphor or a resounding invocation to a place or goddess. He makes rich use of decorative language and florid compound adjectives.[110] Sentences are compressed to the point of obscurity, unusual words and periphrases give the language an esoteric quality, and transitions in meaning often seem erratic, the images seem to burst out – it is a style that sometimes baffles but also makes his poetry vivid and unforgettable.[111] Pindar's power does not lie in the pedigrees of ... athletes ... It lies in a splendour of phrase and imagery that suggests the gold and purple of a sunset sky. – F. L. Lucas[112] He has that force of imagination which can bring clear-cut and dramatic figures of gods and heroes into vivid relief...he has that peculiar and inimitable splendour of style which, though sometimes aided by magnificent novelties of diction, is not dependent on them, but can work magical effects with simple words; he has also, at frequent moments, a marvellous swiftness, alike in the succession of images, and in the transitions from thought to thought; and his tone is that of a prophet who can speak with a voice as of Delphi. – Richard Claverhouse Jebb[88] His odes were animated by... one burning glow which darted out a shower of brilliant images, leapt in a white-hot spark across gaps unbridgeable by thought, passed through a commonplace leaving it luminous and transparent, melted a group of heterogeneous ideas into a shortlived unity and, as suddenly as a flame, died. – Gilbert Highet[113] Some of these qualities can be found, for example, in this stanza from Pythian 2, composed in honour of Hieron: θεὸς ἅπαν ἐπὶ ἐλπίδεσσι τέκμαρ ἀνύεται, θεός, ὃ καὶ πτερόεντ᾽ αἰετὸν κίχε, καὶ θαλασ- :σαῖον παραμείβεται δελφῖνα, καὶ ὑψιφρόνων τιν᾽ ἔκαμψε βροτῶν, ἑτέροισι δὲ κῦδος ἀγήραον παρέδωκ᾽. ἐμὲ δὲ χρεὼν φεύγειν δάκος ἀδινὸν κακαγοριᾶν. εἶδον γὰρ ἑκὰς ἐὼν τὰ πόλλ᾽ ἐν ἀμαχανίᾳ ψογερὸν Ἀρχίλοχον βαρυλόγοις ἔχθεσιν πιαινόμενον: τὸ πλουτεῖν δὲ σὺν τύχᾳ πό- :τμου σοφίας ἄριστον. [114] God achieves all his purpose and fulfills his every hope, God who can overtake the winged eagle, or upon the sea outstrip the dolphin; and he bends the arrogant heart of many a man, But gives to others eternal glory that will never fade. Now for me Is it needful that I shun the fierce and biting tooth of slanderous words. For from old have I seen sharp-tongued Archilochus in want and struggling, Grown fat on the harsh words of hate. The best that fate can bring is wealth joined with the happy gift of wisdom.[115] The stanza begins with a celebration of divine power, and then abruptly shifts to a darker, more allusive train of thought, featuring condemnation of a renowned poet, Archilochus, Grown fat on the harsh words of hate. Archilochus was an iambic poet, working within a genre that licensed abusive and scurrilous verse – a regrettable tendency from the viewpoint of Pindar, whose own persona is intensely earnest, preaching to Hieron the need for moderation (wealth with wisdom) and submission to the divine will. The reference to the embittered poet appears to be Pindar's meditative response to some intrigues at Hieron's court, possibly by his rivals, condemned elsewhere as a pair of ravens (Olympian 2). The intensity of the stanza suggests that it is the culmination and climax of the poem. In fact, the stanza occupies the middle of Pythian 2 and the intensity is sustained throughout the poem from beginning to end. It is the sustained intensity of his poetry that Quintilian refers to above as a rolling flood of eloquence and Horace below refers to as the uncontrollable momentum of a river that has burst its banks. Longinus likens him to a vast fire[116] and Athenaeus refers to him as the great-voiced Pindar.[117] Pindar's treatment of myth is another unique aspect of his style, often involving variations on the traditional stories,[118] since his original audience was familiar with the myths and this allowed him to concentrate on unique and surprising effects. Reversing the chronological order was one such effect, as in Olympian VII dedicated to Diagoras of Rhodes, but this could also resemble a circular pattern, beginning with a culminating event, followed by scenes leading up to it, and ending with its restatement, as in his account of the Dioscuri in Nemean 10.[119] Myths enabled him to develop the themes and lessons that pre-occupy him – in particular mankind's exulted relation with the gods via heroic ancestors and, in contrast, the limitations and uncertainties of human existence – but sometimes the traditional stories were an embarrassment and were carefully edited, as for example: "Be still my tongue: here profits not / to tell the whole truth with clear face unveiled," (Nemean 5, epode 1); "Away, away this story! / Let no such tale fall from my lips! / For to insult the gods is a fool's wisdom," (Olympian 9, strophe 2); "Senseless, I hold it, for a man to say / the gods eat mortal flesh. / I spurn the thought," (Olympian 1, epode 2).[120] His mythical accounts are edited for dramatic and graphic effects, usually unfolding through a few grand gestures against a background of large, often symbolic elements such as sea, sky, darkness, fire or mountain.[110] Structure[edit] Pindar's odes typically begin with an invocation to a god or the Muses, followed by praise of the victor and often of his family, ancestors and home-town. Then follows a narrated myth, usually occupying the central and longest section of the poem, which exemplify a moral, while aligning the poet and his audience with the world of gods and heroes.[121] The ode usually ends in more eulogies, for example of trainers (if the victor is a boy), and of relatives who have won past events, as well as with prayers or expressions of hope for future success.[122] The event where the victory was gained is never described in detail, but there is often some mention of the hard work needed to bring the victory about. A lot of modern criticism tries to find hidden structure or some unifying principle within the odes. 19th century criticism favoured 'gnomic unity' i.e. that each ode is bound together by the kind of moralizing or philosophic vision typical of archaic Gnomic poetry. Later critics sought unity in the way certain words or images are repeated and developed within a particular ode. For others, the odes are just celebrations of men and their communities, in which the elements such as myths, piety, and ethics are stock themes that the poet introduces without much real thought. Some conclude that the requirement for unity is too modern to have informed Pindar's ancient approach to a traditional craft.[90] The great majority of the odes are triadic in structure – i.e., stanzas are grouped together in three's as a lyrical unit. Each triad comprises two stanzas identical in length and meter (called 'strophe' and 'antistrophe') and a third stanza (called an 'epode'), differing in length and meter but rounding off the lyrical movement in some way. The shortest odes comprise a single triad, the largest (Pythian 4) comprises thirteen triads. Seven of the odes however are monostrophic (i.e., each stanza in the ode is identical in length and meter). The monostrophic odes seem to have been composed for victory marches or processions, whereas the triadic odes appear suited to choral dances.[122] Pindar's metrical rhythms are nothing like the simple, repetitive rhythms familiar to readers of English verse – typically the rhythm of any given line recurs infrequently (for example, only once every ten, fifteen or twenty lines). This adds to the aura of complexity that surrounds Pindar's work. In terms of meter, the odes fall roughly into two categories – about half are in dactylo-epitrites (a meter found for example in the works of Stesichorus, Simonides and Bacchylides) and the other half are in Aeolic metres based on iambs and choriambs.[90] Chronological order[edit] Modern editors (e.g., Snell and Maehler in their Teubner edition), have assigned dates, securely or tentatively, to Pindar's victory odes, based on ancient sources and other grounds. The date of an athletic victory is not always the date of composition but often serves merely as a terminus post quem. Many dates are based on comments by ancient sources who had access to published lists of victors, such as the Olympic list compiled by Hippias of Elis, and lists of Pythian victors made by Aristotle and Callisthenes. There were however no such lists for the Isthmian and Nemean Games[123] – Pausanias (6.13.8) complained that the Corinthians and Argives never kept proper records. The resulting uncertainty is reflected in the chronology below, with question marks clustered around Nemean and Isthmian entries, and yet it still represents a fairly clear general timeline of Pindar's career as an epinician poet. The code M denotes monostrophic odes (odes in which all stanzas are metrically identical) and the rest are triadic (i.e. featuring strophes, antistrophes, epodes): Estimated chronological order Date BC Ode Victor Event Focusing Myth 498 Pythian 10 Hippocles of Thessaly Boy's long foot-race Perseus, Hyperboreans 490 Pythian 6 (M) Xenocrates of Acragas Chariot-race Antilochus, Nestor 490 Pythian 12 (M) Midas of Acragas Flute-Playing Perseus, Medusa 488 (?) Olympian 14 (M) Asopichus of Orchomenus Boys' foot-race None 486 Pythian 7 Megacles of Athens Chariot-race None 485 (?) Nemean 2 (M) Timodemus of Acharnae Pancration None 485 (?) Nemean 7 Sogenes of Aegina Boys' Pentathlon Neoptolemus 483 (?) Nemean 5 Pythias of Aegina Youth's Pancration Peleus, Hippolyta, Thetis 480 Isthmian 6 Phylacides of Aegina Pancration Heracles, Telamon 478 (?) Isthmian 5 Phylacides of Aegina Pancration Aeacids, Achilles 478 Isthmian 8 (M) Cleandrus of Aegina Pancration Zeus, Poseidon, Thetis 476 Olympian 1 Hieron of Syracuse Horse-race Pelops 476 Olympians 2 & 3 Theron of Acragas Chariot-race 2.Isles of the Blessed 3.Heracles, Hyperboreans 476 Olympian 11 Agesidamus of Epizephyrian Locris Boys' Boxing Match Heracles, founding of Olympian Games 476 (?) Nemean 1 Chromius of Aetna Chariot-race Infant Heracles 475 (?) Pythian 2 Hieron of Syracuse Chariot-race Ixion 475 (?) Nemean 3 Aristocleides of Aegina Pancration Aeacides, Achilles 474 (?) Olympian 10 Agesidamus of Epizephyrian Locris Boys' Boxing Match None 474 (?) Pythian 3 Hieron of Syracuse Horse-race Asclepius 474 Pythian 9 Telesicrates of Cyrene Foot-race in armour Apollo, Cyrene 474 Pythian 11 Thrasydaeus of Thebes Boys' short foot-race Orestes, Clytemnestra 474 (?) Nemean 9 (M) Chromius of Aetna Chariot-race Seven against Thebes 474/3 (?) Isthmian 3 & 4 Melissus of Thebes Chariot race & pancration 3.None 4.Heracles, Antaeus 473 (?) Nemean 4 (M) Timisarchus of Aegina Boys' Wrestling Match Aeacids, Peleus, Thetis 470 Pythian 1 Hieron of Aetna Chariot-race Typhon 470 (?) Isthmian 2 Xenocrates of Acragas Chariot-race None 468 Olympian 6 Agesias of Syracuse Chariot-race with mules Iamus 466 Olympian 9 Epharmus of Opous Wrestling-Match Deucalion, Pyrrha 466 Olympian 12 Ergoteles of Himera Long foot-race Fortune 465 (?) Nemean 6 Alcimidas of Aegina Boys' Wrestling Match Aeacides, Achilles, Memnon 464 Olympian 7 Diagoras of Rhodes Boxing-Match Tlepolemus 464 Olympian 13 Xenophon of Corinth Short foot-race & pentathlon Bellerophon, Pegasus 462/1 Pythian 4 & 5 Arcesilas of Cyrene Chariot-race 4.Argonauts 5.Battus 460 Olympian 8 Alcimidas of Aegina Boys' Wrestling-Match Aeacus, Troy 459 (?) Nemean 8 Deinis of Aegina Foot-race Ajax 458 (?) Isthmian 1 Herodotus of Thebes Chariot-race Castor, Iolaus 460 or 456 (?) Olympian 4 & 5 Psaumis of Camarina Chariot-race with mules 4.Erginus 5.None 454 (?) Isthmian 7 Strepsiades of Thebes Pancration None 446 Pythian 8 Aristomenes of Aegina Wrestling-Match Amphiaraus 446 (?) Nemean 11 Aristagoras of Tenedos Inauguration as Prytanis None 444 (?) Nemean 10 Theaius of Argos Wrestling-Match Castor, Pollux Manuscripts, shreds and quotes[edit] Pindar's verses have come down to us in a variety of ways. Some are only preserved as fragments via quotes by ancient sources and papyri unearthed by archeologists, as at Oxyrhynchus – in fact the extant works of most of the other canonic lyric poets have survived only in this tattered form. Pindar's extant verses are unique in that the bulk of them – the victory odes – have been preserved in a manuscript tradition, i.e., generations of scribes copying from earlier copies, possibly originating in a single archetypal copy and sometimes graphically demonstrated by modern scholars in the form of a stemma codicum, resembling a 'family tree'. Pindar's victory odes are preserved in just two manuscripts, but incomplete collections are located in many others, and all date from the mediaeval period. Some scholars have traced a stemma through these manuscripts, for example Ulrich von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, who inferred from them the existence of a common source or archetype dated no earlier than the 2nd century AD, while others, such as C.M. Bowra, have argued that there are too many discrepancies between manuscripts to identify a specific lineage, even while accepting the existence of an archetype. Otto Schroeder identified two families of manuscripts but, following on the work of Polish-born classicist, Alexander Turyn,[124] Bowra rejected this also.[125] Different scholars interpret the extant manuscripts differently. Bowra for example singled out seven manuscripts as his primary sources (see below), all featuring errors and/or gaps due to loss of folios and careless copying, and one arguably characterized by the dubious interpolations of Byzantine scholars. These he cross-referenced and then supplemented or verified by reference to other, still more doubtful manuscripts, and some papyrus fragments – a combination of sources on which he based his own edition of the odes and fragments. His general method of selection he defined as follows: Where all the codices agree, there perhaps the true reading shines out. Where however they differ, the preferred reading is that which best fits the sense, meter, scholia and grammatic conventions. Wherever moreover two or more readings of equal weight are found in the codices, I have chosen that which smacks most of Pindar. Yet this difficulty rarely occurs, and in many places the true reading will be found if you examine and compare the language of the codices with that of other Greek poets and especially of Pindar himself.[126] Selected manuscripts – a sample of preferred sources (Bowra's choice, 1947) Code Source Format Date Comments A codex Ambrosianus C 222inf. paper 35×25.5 cm 13–14th century Comprises Olympian Odes 1–12, with some unique readings that Bowra considered reliable, and including scholia. B codex Vaticanus graeca 1312 silk 24.3×18.4 cm 13th century Comprises odes Olympian 1 to Isthmian 8 (entire corpus), but with some leaves and verses missing, and includes scholia; Zacharias Callierges based his 1515 Roman edition on it, possibly with access to the now missing material. C codex Parisinus graecus 2774 silk 23×15 cm 14th century Comprises odes Olympian 1 to Pythian 5, including some unique readings but also with many Byzantine interpolations/conjectures (Turyn rejected this codex accordingly), and written in a careless hand. D codex Laurentianus 32, 52 silk 27×19 cm 14th century Comprises odes Olympian 1 to Isthmian 8 (entire corpus), including a fragment (Frag. 1) and scholia, written in a careless hand. E codex Laurentianus 32, 37 silk 24×17 cm 14th century Comprises odes Olympian 1 to Pythian 12, largely in agreement with B, including scholia but with last page removed and replaced with paper in a later hand. G codex Gottingensis philologus 29 silk 25×17 cm 13th century Comprises odes Olympian 2 to Pythian 12, largely in agreement with B (thus useful for comparisons), including Olympian 1 added in the 16th century. V codex Parisinus graecus 2403 silk 25×17 cm 14th century Comprises odes Olympian 1 to Nemean 4, including some verses from Nemean 6; like G, useful for supporting and verifying B. Influence and legacy[edit] The influential Alexandrian poet Callimachus was fascinated by Pindar's originality. His masterpiece Aetia (Callimachus)Aetia included an elegy in honour of Queen Berenice, celebrating a chariot victory at the Nemean Games, composed in a style and presented in a manner that recall Pindar.[127] The Hellenistic epic Argonautica, by Apollonius Rhodius, was influenced by some aspects of Pindar's style and his use of episodic vignettes in narrative. The epic concerns the adventures of Jason, also touched on by Pindar in Pythian 4, and both poems link the myth to a Greek audience in Africa.[128] There seems to have been a vogue for Pindaric-style lyrics following the 'publication' of Horace's Odes 1–3 – Horace had mastered other styles such as Sapphic and Alcaeic, which had discouraged his contemporaries from attempting anything in the same form, but he had not composed anything in triadic stanzas in the manner of Pindar.[129] Pindar was much read, quoted, and copied during the Byzantine Era. For example, Christophoros Mytilenaios of the 11th century parodied a chariot race in his sixth poem employing explicit allusions to Pindar.[130] During the 17th and 18th centuries, literary theorists in Europe distinguished between two types of lyric poetry, loosely associated with Horace and Pindar. Regular verses in four line stanzas were associated with Horace's Odes, which did in fact inspire and influence poets of the period. Irregular verses in longer stanzas were termed Pindarics though the association with Pindar was largely fanciful. Abraham Cowley was considered the main exponent of English Pindarics. In fact, the two styles were not always easy to distinguish and many 'Pindaric' odes were quite Horatian in content, as in some poems by Thomas Gray.[131] A 'Pindaric Ode' was composed for the revived 1896 Olympic Games in Athens by the Oxford scholar George Stuart Robinson, and similar compositions were commissioned from and composed by classicist Armand D'Angour for the Athens Olympics in 2004 and the London Olympics in 2012. Horace's tribute[edit] The Latin poet, Quintus Horatius Flaccus, was an admirer of Pindar's style. He described it in one of his Sapphic poems, addressed to a friend, Iullus Antonius: Pindarum quisquis studet aemulari, Iule, ceratis ope Daedalea nititur pennis vitreo daturus nomina ponto. monte decurrens velut amnis, imbres quem super notas aluere ripas, fervet immensusque ruit profundo Pindarus ore. (C.IV.II) Julus, whoever tries to rival Pindar, Flutters on wings of wax, a rude contriver Doomed like the son of Daedalus to christen Somewhere a shining sea. A river bursts its banks and rushes down a Mountain with uncontrollable momentum, Rain-saturated, churning, chanting thunder – There you have Pindar's style.[132] Bowra's tribute[edit] C. M. Bowra, the leading Pindaric scholar of his generation, and the editor of the 1935 O.U.P edition of his poems, summarized Pindar's qualities in the following words: "His innate, unquestioning pride in his poetical mission means that he gives to it all his gifts and all his efforts. The result is a poetry that by any standards deserves the name because it is based on a radiant vision of reality and fashioned with so subtle, so adventurous, and so dedicated an art that it is worthy to be an earthly counterpart of the songs which Pindar regards as the archetype of music on those lofty occasions when all discords are resolved and all misgivings obliterated by the power of the life-giving word."[133] See also[edit] John Wolcot Notes[edit] ^ Pindar (1972) p. 212. The three lines here, and in Bowra's Greek, are actually two lines or stichoi in Greek prosody. Stichoi however are often too long to be preserved as single lines in published form, and they are then broken into metrical units, or cola, the break indicated by indentation. This practice is observed both in Greek and in translations, but it is a modern convenience or preference and it has no historical authority: "...nullam habet apud codices auctoritatem neque veri simile est Pindarum ita carmina manu propria conscripsisse." ^ There are several other accounts of supernatural visitations relating to Pindar (see for example C.M. Bowra, Pindar, pages 49-51). According to a scholium, he and a pupil, Olympichus, once saw a mysterious flame on a mountain, attended by strange noises. Pindar then beheld Rhea, the Mother of the Gods, advancing in the form of a wooden image. Pausanias (9.25.3) reported that he set up a monument near his home, dedicated conjointly to Pan and the Mother of the Gods (Δινδυμήνη). According to Eustathius (Proem. 27, p. 298. 9 Dr) and Vit. Ambr. (p. 2. 2 Dr.), Pan was once heard between Cithaeron and Helicon singing a paean composed to him by Pindar (fr. 85). ^ Paean 9.13-20). The eclipse is mentioned in a fragment quoted by Stobaeus, addressed to the Thebans: Is it some sign of war you bring? / Or blight on crops, or snow-fall's strength / Beyond all telling, or murderous strife at home, / Or emptying of the sea on land, / Or frost binding the earth, or south-wind in summer / With a flood of furious rain, / Or will you drown the land and raise / A new breed of men from the beginning? ^ fr. 129: τί θεός; τὸ πάν ^ Chiron's compliment to Apollo: "You, Sire, who know / The appointed end of all, and all paths: / How many leaves in April the earth puts forth, / How many grains of sand / In the sea and rivers / Are troubled by the waves and the swirling winds, / And what shall be, and whence it shall come / You see with clear eyes." ^ Nemean Odes 5.14–18: I am shy of speaking of a huge risk / Hazarded not in right, / How they left the famous island, / And what fate drove strong men from the Vineland. / I shall halt. Truth does not always / Gain more if unflinching / She reveals her face; / And silence is often a man's wisest counsel. References[edit] ^ The Greek and Roman critics: "The odes of Pindar (518-438B.C.), written for the most part to celebrate victories in athletic contests, are interspersed with moral and philosophical reflections" ^ Quintilian 10.1.61; cf. Pseudo-Longinus 33.5 Archived 2011-08-06 at the Wayback Machine. ^ Eupolis F366 Kock, 398 K/A, from Athenaeus 3a, (Deipnosophistae, epitome of book I) ^ Lawrence Henry Baker (1923). "Some Aspects of Pindar's Style". The Sewanee Review. 31 (1): 100–110. JSTOR 27533621. ^ Gerber, p. 261 ^ de Romilly, p. 37 ^ Bowra, Pythia VIII, lines 95–7 ^ Pindar (1972) p. 144 ^ Pindar (1972) Introduction p. xv ^ Race, p. 4 ^ a b Gerber, p. 253 ^ Morice, pp. 211–15 ^ Escholarship.org ^ E.Bundy, Studia Pindarica, Berkeley (1962), p. 35 ^ Lloyd-Jones, Hugh (1982). "Pindar". Proceedings of the British Academy. 68: 139–163 (145). [permanent dead link] ^ Hornblower 2004, p. 38. ^ a b Hornblower 2004, p. 59. ^ Hornblower 2004, p. 67. ^ Currie, pp. 11–13 ^ Nemean 8, lines 20–21 ^ Bowra 1947. ^ Bowra 1947, p. 9. ^ "Ancient Greece - War - The British Museum". www.ancientgreece.co.uk. Retrieved 2020-07-18. ^ Editors, History com. "Battle of Marathon". HISTORY. Retrieved 2020-07-18.CS1 maint: extra text: authors list (link) ^ Hubbard, T. K. (1992). "Remaking Myth and Rewriting History: Cult Tradition in Pindar's Ninth Nemean'". Harvard Studies in Classical Philology. 94: 77–111 [78]. doi:10.2307/311420. JSTOR 311420. ^ Gerber, p. 270 ^ Hornblower 2004, p. 177. ^ Hornblower 2004, p. 178. ^ Hornblower 2004, p. 179. ^ Hornblower 2004, p. 180. ^ Ian Rutherford, Pindar's Paeans, Oxford University Press (2001), pp. 321–22 ^ Woodbury, Leonard (1979). "Neoptolemus at Delphi: Pindar, Nem.7.30ff". Phoenix. 33 (2): 95–133. doi:10.2307/1087989. JSTOR 1087989. ^ Isocrates 15.166 ^ Pindar (1972) p. 158 ^ Hornblower 2004, p. 57. ^ Pindar (1972) pp. 10, 88–9 ^ Pindar (1972) Introduction p. XIII ^ Hornblower 2004, p. 16. ^ Race, pp. 10–11 ^ David Campbell, Greek Lyric IV, Loeb Classical Library (1992), page 6 ^ Pindar (1972) p. 239 ^ D. Campbell, Greek Lyric IV, p. 2 ^ Pindar (1972), p. 138 ^ Charles Segal, 'Choral Lyric in the Fifth Century', in Easterling, pp. 231–232 ^ Pindar (1972) p. 142 ^ Currie, p. 20 ^ Gerber, pp. 268–269 ^ Plutarch, Life of Alexander 11.6; Arrian, Anabasis Alexandri 1.9.10 ^ Bowra 1964, p. 2. ^ Bowra 1964, p. 38. ^ Archilochus fr. 122 West ^ Bowra 1964, p. 83. ^ a b c Bowra 1964, p. 84. ^ Bowra 1964, p. 42. ^ Bowra 1964, p. 43. ^ Olympic Ode 10.3-4 ^ Olympic Ode 12.1-2) ^ Bowra 1964, p. 85. ^ Bowra 1964, p. 86. ^ Bowra 1964, p. 87. ^ Pythian Ode 9 ^ Bowra 1964, p. 61. ^ Bowra 1964, p. 64. ^ Bowra 1964, p. 65. ^ Pythian Ode 8.99–100 ^ a b Bowra 1964, p. 67. ^ Bowra 1964, p. 68. ^ Isthmian Odes 4.57 ^ Bowra 1964, p. 47. ^ Bowra 1964, p. 48. ^ Bowra 1964, p. 71. ^ Bowra 1964, p. 66. ^ Bowra 1964, p. 96. ^ Bowra 1964, p. 89-96. ^ Bowra 1964, p. 76. ^ Bowra 1964, p. 77. ^ Bowra 1964, p. 120. ^ Bowra 1964, p. 100. ^ Bowra 1964, p. 101. ^ Bowra 1964, p. 102. ^ Bowra 1964, p. 103. ^ Bowra 1964, p. 4. ^ Bowra 1964, p. 5. ^ Bowra 1964, p. 6. ^ Bowra 1964, p. 7. ^ Nemean Ode 7.77-79 ^ a b Bowra 1964, p. 16. ^ a b Jebb, Richard (1905) Bacchylides: the poems and fragments, Cambridge University Press, p. 41 ^ Pindar (1972) p. 17 ^ a b c Gerber, p. 255 ^ Gregory Nagy, Greek Literature in the Hellenistic Period, Routledge (2001), page 66 ^ M.M. Willcock: Pindar: Victory Odes (1995). Cambridge University Press, p. 3. ^ Bowie, p. 110 ^ Dionysius of Halicarnassus, de Comp. 22, de Dem. 39 ^ Bowra 1964, p. 193. ^ a b Bowra 1964, p. 363. ^ Bowra 1964, p. 25. ^ Bowra 1964, p. 26. ^ Bowra 1964, p. 62. ^ a b Bowra 1964, p. 63. ^ Bowra 1964, p. 15. ^ Bowra 1964, p. 17. ^ Bowra 1964, p. 18. ^ Bowra 1964, p. 19. ^ Bowra 1964, p. 20. ^ Antony Andrewes, Greek Society, Pelican Books (1971), pp. 219–22 ^ Pindar (1972) p. 235 ^ Pindar (1972), p. 88. 96 ^ Pindar (1972) Introduction p. xx ^ a b Charles Segal, 'Choral Lyric in the Fifth Century', in Easterling, p. 232 ^ de Romilly, p. 38 ^ Lucas, F. L. Greek Poetry for Everyman. Macmillan Company, New York. p. 262. ^ Gilbert Highet, The Classical Tradition, Oxford University Press (1949), p. 225 ^ Bowra, Pythia II 49–56 ^ Pindar (1972) pp. 92–3 ^ De Subl. 33.5 ^ Athenaeus 13.5.64c ^ Bowie, pp. 107–8 ^ Bowra 1964, p. 310. ^ Pindar (1972) pp. 192, 54, 4, respectively ^ Bowie, p. 108 ^ a b Pindar (1972) ^ Currie, p. 25 ^ Miroslav Marcovich (1982). "Alexander Turyn". Gnomon. 54 (1): 97–98. JSTOR 27688007. ^ Bowra, Praefatio iii–iv, vii ^ Bowra, Praefatio iv ^ A.W. Bulloch, 'Hellenistic Poetry', in Easterling, pp. 556–57 ^ William H. Race, Apollonius Rhodius: Argonautica, Loeb Classical Library (2008), page xiii ^ R. Tarrant, 'Ancient receptions of Horace', in The Cambridge Companion to Horace, Stephen Harrison (ed.), Cambridge university Press (2007), page 280 ^ F. Lauritzen, Readers of Pindar and students of Mitylinaios, Byzantion 2010 ^ David Money, 'The seventeenth and eighteenth centuries', in The Cambridge Companion to Horace, Stephen Harrison (ed), Cambridge University Press (2007), pp. 327–28 ISBN 0-521-83002-8 ^ The Odes of Horace James Michie (translator), Penguin Classics 1976 ^ Bowra 1964, p. 401. Sources[edit] Bowie, Ewen, 'Lyric and Elegiac Poetry' in The Oxford History of the Classical World, J. Boardman, J. Griffin and O. Murray (eds), Oxford University Press (1986) ISBN 0-19-872112-9 Bowra, C. M. (1947). Pindari Carmina Cum Fragmentis, Editio Altera. Oxford University Press. Bowra, Cecil Maurice (1964). Pindar. Clarendon Press. pp. 446. ISBN 978-0-19-814338-3. Campbell, David A. (1992). Greek Lyric IV: Bacchylides, Corinna and Others. Loeb Classical Library. ISBN 978-0-674-99508-6. Currie, Bruno (2005), Pindar and the Cult of Heroes, Oxford University Press ISBN 0-19-161516-1 Easterling, P. & Knox, B. (eds) (1985), The Cambridge History of Classical Greek Literature "Greek Literature", Cambridge University Press Gerber, Douglas E. (1997) A Companion to the Greek lyric poets, Brill ISBN 90-04-09944-1 Hornblower, Simon (2004). Thucydides and Pindar: Historical Narrative and the World of Epinikian Poetry. Oxford University Press. p. 454. ISBN 978-0-19-929828-0. Morice, Francis David (2009), Pindar, Bibliobazaar, LLC ISBN 1-148-33210-3 Conway, Geoffrey Seymour (1972), The Odes of Pindar, Dent ISBN 978-0-460-01017-7 Race, William H. (1997), Pindar: Olympian Odes, Pythian Odes, Loeb Classical Library ISBN 0-674-99564-3 De Romilly, Jacqueline (1985), A Short History of Greek Literature, University of Chicage Press Further reading[edit] Nisetich, Frank J., Pindar's Victory Songs. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1980: translations and extensive introduction, background and critical apparatus. Revard, Stella P., Politics, Poetics, and the Pindaric Ode 1450–1700, Turnhout, Brepols Publishers, 2010, ISBN 978-2-503-52896-0 Race, W. H. Pindar. 2 vols. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1997. Bundy, Elroy L. (2006) [1962]. Studia Pindarica (PDF) (digital version ed.). Berkeley, California: Department of Classics, University of California, Berkeley. Retrieved 2007-02-12. Barrett, W. S., Greek Lyric, Tragedy, and Textual Criticism: Collected Papers, edited M. L. West (Oxford & New York, 2007): papers dealing with Pindar, Stesichorus, Bacchylides and Euripides Kiichiro Itsumi, Pindaric Metre: 'The Other Half' (Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2009). Burnett, Anne Pippin, Pindar (London: Bristol Classical Press, 2008) (Ancients in action). Wells, James Bradley. Pindar's Verbal Art: An Enthnographic Study of Epinician Style, Hellenic Studies Series 40. Washington, DC, Center for Hellenic Studies, 2010, ISBN 978-0-674-03627-7 External links[edit] Pindarat Wikipedia's sister projects Media from Wikimedia Commons Quotations from Wikiquote Texts from Wikisource Data from Wikidata Wikisource has original text related to this article: Portal:Odes of Pindar Library resources about Pindar Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries By Pindar Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries Works by Pindar at Perseus Digital Library Classical poetry at Curlie Works by Pindar at Project Gutenberg Works by or about Pindar at Internet Archive Works by Pindar at Open Library Selected odes, marked up to show selected rhetorical and poetic devices Olympian 1, read aloud in Greek, with text and English translation provided Pythian 8, 'Approaching Pindar' by William Harris (text, translation, analysis) Pindar by Gregory Crane, in the Perseus Encyclopedia Pindar's Life by Basil L. Gildersleeve, in Pindar: The Olympian and Pythian Odes Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Pindar, Olympian Odes, I, 1–64; read by William Mullen Perseus Digital Library Lexicon to Pindar, William J. Slater, De Gruyter 1969: scholarly dictionary for research into Pindar Pindar-A Hellenistic Bibliography compiled by Martine Cuypers William J. Slater, Lexicon to Pindar, Berlin, De Gruyter, 1969 on http://www.perseus.tufts.edu Historic editions The Odes of Pindar translated into English with notes, D.W.Turner, A Moore, Bohm Classical Library (1852), digitalized by Google Encyclopædia Britannica 11th ed. 1911 Vol. 21 'Pindar' Pindar – translations and notes by Reverend C.A.Wheelwright, printed by A.J.Valpy, M.A., London (1830): digitalized by Google Pindari carmina, adnotationem criticam addidit Tycho Mommsen, vol. 1, vol. 2, Berolini apud Weidmannos, 1864. Scholia of Pindar: Pindari opera quae supersunt. Scholia integra, Augustus Boeckhius (ed.), 2 voll., Lipsiae apud Ioann. August. Gottlob Weigen, 1811: vol. 1, vol. 2. Scholia vetera in Pindari carmina, Anders Bjørn Drachmann (ed.), 3 voll., Verlag Adolf M. Hakkert, Amsterdam, 1903-27: vol. 1, vol. 2, vol. 3. v t e Nine lyric poets — Ancient Greek literature Alcman Sappho Alcaeus Anacreon Stesichorus Ibycus Simonides Pindar Bacchylides v t e Ancient Greece Timeline History Geography Periods Cycladic civilization Minoan civilization Mycenaean civilization Greek Dark Ages Archaic period Classical Greece Hellenistic Greece Roman Greece Geography Aegean Sea Aeolis Alexandria Antioch Cappadocia Crete Cyprus Doris Ephesus Epirus Hellespont Ionia Ionian Sea Macedonia Magna Graecia Miletus Peloponnesus Pergamon Pontus Taurica Ancient Greek colonies City states Politics Military City states Argos Athens Byzantion Chalcis Corinth Eretria Kerkyra Larissa Megalopolis Megara Rhodes Samos Sparta Syracuse Thebes Politics Boule Koinon Proxeny Tagus Tyrant Amphictyonic League Athenian Agora Areopagus Ecclesia Graphe paranomon Heliaia Ostracism Spartan Apella Ephor Gerousia Macedon Synedrion Koinon Military Wars Athenian military Scythian archers Antigonid Macedonian army Army of Macedon Ballista Cretan archers Hellenistic armies Hippeis Hoplite Hetairoi Macedonian phalanx Phalanx Peltast Pezhetairos Sarissa Sacred Band of Thebes Sciritae Seleucid army Spartan army Strategos Toxotai Xiphos Xyston People List of ancient Greeks Rulers Kings of Argos Archons of Athens Kings of Athens Kings of Commagene Diadochi Kings of Lydia Kings of Macedonia Kings of Paionia Attalid kings of Pergamon Kings of Pontus Kings of Sparta Tyrants of Syracuse Philosophers Anaxagoras Anaximander Anaximenes Antisthenes Aristotle Democritus Diogenes of Sinope Empedocles Epicurus Gorgias Heraclitus Hypatia Leucippus Parmenides Plato Protagoras Pythagoras Socrates Thales Zeno Authors Aeschylus Aesop Alcaeus Archilochus Aristophanes Bacchylides Euripides Herodotus Hesiod Hipponax Homer Ibycus Lucian Menander Mimnermus Panyassis Philocles Pindar Plutarch Polybius Sappho Simonides Sophocles Stesichorus Theognis Thucydides Timocreon Tyrtaeus Xenophon Others Agesilaus II Agis II Alcibiades Alexander the Great Aratus Archimedes Aspasia Demosthenes Epaminondas Euclid Hipparchus Hippocrates Leonidas Lycurgus Lysander Milo of Croton Miltiades Pausanias Pericles Philip of Macedon Philopoemen Praxiteles Ptolemy Pyrrhus Solon Themistocles Groups Philosophers Playwrights Poets Tyrants By culture Ancient Greek tribes Thracian Greeks Ancient Macedonians Society Culture Society Agriculture Calendar Clothing Coinage Cuisine Economy Education Festivals Homosexuality Law Olympic Games Pederasty Philosophy Prostitution Religion Slavery Warfare Wedding customs Wine Arts and science Architecture Greek Revival architecture Astronomy Literature Mathematics Medicine Music Musical system Pottery Sculpture Technology Theatre Religion Funeral and burial practices Mythology mythological figures Temple Twelve Olympians Underworld Sacred places Eleusis Delphi Delos Dion Dodona Mount Olympus Olympia Structures Athenian Treasury Lion Gate Long Walls Philippeion Theatre of Dionysus Tunnel of Eupalinos Temples Aphaea Artemis Athena Nike Erechtheion Hephaestus Hera, Olympia Parthenon Samothrace Zeus, Olympia Language Proto-Greek Mycenaean Homeric Dialects Aeolic Arcadocypriot Attic Doric Ionic Locrian Macedonian Pamphylian Koine Writing Linear A Linear B Cypriot syllabary Greek alphabet Greek numerals Attic numerals Greek colonisation South Italy Alision Brentesion Caulonia Chone Croton Cumae Elea Heraclea Lucania Hipponion Hydrus Krimisa Laüs Locri Medma Metapontion Neápolis Pandosia (Lucania) Poseidonia Pixous Rhegion Scylletium Siris Sybaris Sybaris on the Traeis Taras Terina Thurii Sicily Akragas Akrai Akrillai Apollonia Calacte Casmenae Catana Gela Helorus Henna Heraclea Minoa Himera Hybla Gereatis Hybla Heraea Kamarina Leontinoi Megara Hyblaea Messana Naxos Segesta Selinous Syracuse Tauromenion Thermae Tyndaris Aeolian Islands Didyme Euonymos Ereikousa Hycesia Lipara/Meligounis Phoenicusa Strongyle Therassía Sardinia Olbia Cyrenaica Balagrae Barca Berenice Cyrene (Apollonia) Ptolemais Iberian Peninsula Akra Leuke Alonis Emporion Helike Hemeroscopion Kalathousa Kypsela Mainake Menestheus's Limin Illicitanus Limin/Portus Illicitanus Rhode Salauris Zacynthos Black Sea north coast Borysthenes Charax Chersonesus Dioscurias Eupatoria Gorgippia Hermonassa Kepoi Kimmerikon Myrmekion Nikonion Nymphaion Olbia Panticapaion Phanagoria Pityus Tanais Theodosia Tyras Tyritake Black Sea south coast Dionysopolis Odessos Anchialos Mesambria Apollonia Salmydessus Heraclea Tium Sesamus Cytorus Abonoteichos Sinope Zaliche Amisos Oinòe Polemonion Thèrmae Cotyora Kerasous Tripolis Trapezous Rhizos Athina Bathus Phasis Lists Cities in Epirus People Place names Stoae Temples Theatres Category Portal Outline Authority control BIBSYS: 90130028 BNE: XX922653 BNF: cb119920037 (data) CANTIC: a1045651x CiNii: DA01200140 GND: 118594427 ICCU: IT\ICCU\CFIV\071419 ISNI: 0000 0001 2145 1036 LCCN: n79138879 LNB: 000054600 MBA: 24821410-659b-4da5-8bb8-04e11eb5fda4 NKC: jn19990210493 NLG: 27813 NSK: 000048442 NTA: 068852568 RERO: 02-A000130838 SELIBR: 196913 SNAC: w6jd6m0n SUDOC: 028344685 Trove: 947519 VcBA: 495/19544 VIAF: 100181310 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n79138879 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pindar&oldid=996645877" Categories: Ancient Boeotian poets Ancient Thebans 5th-century BC Greek people 5th-century BC poets Ancient Greek poets Nine Lyric Poets Proxenoi Doric Greek poets 510s BC births 430s BC deaths Hidden categories: Articles containing Ancient Greek (to 1453)-language text Webarchive template wayback links All articles with dead external links Articles with dead external links from May 2020 Articles with permanently dead external links CS1 maint: extra text: authors list Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata Articles containing Latin-language text Wikipedia articles needing clarification from June 2020 All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from September 2012 Pages using Sister project links with hidden wikidata Articles with Curlie links Articles with Project Gutenberg links Articles with Internet Archive links Open Library ID different from Wikidata Articles with Open Library links Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CANTIC identifiers Wikipedia articles with CINII identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ICCU identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with LNB identifiers Wikipedia articles with MusicBrainz identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLG identifiers Wikipedia articles with NSK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with RERO identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SNAC-ID identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with Trove identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikiquote Wikisource Languages العربية Aragonés Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ Български Brezhoneg Català Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Estremeñu Euskara فارسی Français Galego 한국어 Հայերեն Hrvatski Ido Bahasa Indonesia Interlingua Íslenska Italiano עברית ქართული Қазақша Latina Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Македонски മലയാളം Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Occitan Piemontèis Polski Ποντιακά Português Română Русский Sicilianu Simple English Slovenčina Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Tagalog Türkçe Українська Tiếng Việt Winaray 吴语 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 27 December 2020, at 21:24 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2010 ---- Festus (historian) - Wikipedia Festus (historian) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Not to be confused with Postumius Rufius Festus Avienius. Titel Page of Festus' Breviarium (Rome, 1819) Festus (fl. 4th century), whose name also appears in the manuscripts of his work as Rufus Festus, Ruffus Festus, Sextus Festus, Sextus Rufus, and Sextus, was a Late Roman historian and proconsul of Asia whose epitome Breviarium rerum gestarum populi Romani ("Summary of the history of Rome"[1]) was commissioned by the emperor Valens in preparation for his war against Persia. It was completed about AD 370. The Breviarium covers the entire history of the Roman state from the foundation of the City until AD 364. The book consists of 30 chapters treating events in Roman history in terse overview, mainly focused on military and political conflicts. It is estimated as a work of very low quality.[2] Festus of Tridentum, magister memoriae (secretary) to Valens and notoriously severe proconsul of the province of Asia, where he was sent to punish those implicated in the conspiracy of Theodorus. The work itself (Breviarium rerum gestarum populi Romani) is divided into two parts, one geographical, the other historical. J. W. Eadie has shown that Festus used the following sources:[3] The Breviarium historiae Romanae of Eutropius, newly compiled by order of the same emperor The Epitome rerum Romanarum (until the reign of Augustus) by Florus The epitome of Livy, a lost work based on Ab Urbe condita A history of the Roman emperors, perhaps the one that is called the Enmannsche Kaisergeschichte References[edit] ^ One source was the Enmannsche Kaisergeschichte[clarification needed] ^ Baldwin, B. (1991), "Festus", The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium, 2, Oxford, p. 784 ^ Eadie, J. W., ed. (1967) The Breviarium of Festus. London: Athlone Press; pp. 70-98 ("The Sources of the Breviarium"). Sources[edit] Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae 29.2.22. Eunapius, Vitae sophistarum 7.6.6-13. Suda s.v. Φῆστος. Zosimus, Historia Nova 4.15.2-3. External links[edit] "Sextus Rufus" in Smith's Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology Banchich, Thomas M. (translator); Meka, Jennifer A. (translator) (2001), De Imperatoribus Romanis: Breviarium of the accomplishments of the Roman people translated, Canisius College Translated Texts, Number 2, Buffalo, New York: Canisius College Mecenate, Raphael (editor) (1819), Breviarium Rerum Gestarum Populi Romani, Latin TextCS1 maint: extra text: authors list (link) Authority control BIBSYS: 95004540 BNE: XX5165576 BNF: cb122000076 (data) CiNii: DA09667700 GND: 118843966 ISNI: 0000 0001 0923 4696 LCCN: n88181630 NKC: jn19981002093 NLG: 216597 NSK: 000382515 NTA: 073755842 RERO: 02-A000140308 SELIBR: 53189 SUDOC: 030739233 Trove: 1057906 VcBA: 495/21879 VIAF: 79076696 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n88181630 This ancient Roman biographical article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. v t e Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Festus_(historian)&oldid=985826351" Categories: Roman governors of Asia Ancient Roman proconsuls 4th-century Latin writers Latin historians 4th-century historians Ancient Roman people stubs Hidden categories: Wikipedia articles needing clarification from August 2014 Articles containing Ancient Greek (to 1453)-language text CS1 maint: extra text: authors list Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CINII identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLG identifiers Wikipedia articles with NSK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with RERO identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with Trove identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers All stub articles Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages العربية Asturianu Български Català Čeština Deutsch Español فارسی Français Հայերեն Bahasa Indonesia Italiano עברית Latina Magyar Nederlands Polski Português Русский Slovenčina Tiếng Việt Edit links This page was last edited on 28 October 2020, at 04:55 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2015 ---- Category:Wikipedia articles with LNB identifiers - Wikipedia Help Category:Wikipedia articles with LNB identifiers From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search This category is for articles with LNB identifiers. Please do not add subcategories. For more information, see Wikipedia:Authority control. Administrators: Please do not delete this category even if it is empty! This category may be empty occasionally or even most of the time. This is a maintenance category, used for maintenance of the Wikipedia project. It is not part of the encyclopedia and contains non-article pages, or groups articles by status rather than subject. Do not include this category in content categories. This is a tracking category. It builds and maintains a list of pages primarily for the sake of the list itself. They are not part of the encyclopedia's categorization scheme. This category is hidden on its member pages—unless the corresponding user preference (appearance → show hidden categories) is set. These categories are used to track, build and organize lists of pages needing "attention en masse" (for example, pages using deprecated syntax), or that may need to be edited at someone's earliest convenience. These categories also serve to aggregate members of several lists or sub-categories into a larger, more efficient list (discriminated by classifications). Contents: Top 0–9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z * # 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 • A Aa Ae Aj Ao At • B Ba Be Bj Bo Bt • C Ca Ce Cj Co Ct • D Da De Dj Do Dt • E Ea Ee Ej Eo Et • F Fa Fe Fj Fo Ft • G Ga Ge Gj Go Gt • H Ha He Hj Ho Ht • I Ia Ie Ij Io It • J Ja Je Jj Jo Jt • K Ka Ke Kj Ko Kt • L La Le Lj Lo Lt • M Ma Me Mj Mo Mt • N Na Ne Nj No Nt • O Oa Oe Oj Oo Ot • P Pa Pe Pj Po Pt • Q Qa Qe Qj Qo Qt • R Ra Re Rj Ro Rt • S Sa Se Sj So St • T Ta Te Tj To Tt • U Ua Ue Uj Uo Ut • V Va Ve Vj Vo Vt • W Wa We Wj Wo Wt • X Xa Xe Xj Xo Xt • Y Ya Ye Yj Yo Yt • Z Za Ze Zj Zo Zt Pages in this category should only be added by Module:Authority control. Pages in category "Wikipedia articles with LNB identifiers" The following 200 pages are in this category, out of approximately 17,031 total. This list may not reflect recent changes (learn more). (previous page) (next page), Yusaku Kamekura A Aachen Cathedral Eivind Aadland Kim Fupz Aakeson Wil van der Aalst Aino Aalto Antti Aarne Asbjørn Aarnes Selma Lønning Aarø Henry J. Aaron Edward S. Aarons Espen Aarseth Mercedes Abad Magdalena Abakanowicz Leonid Abalkin Arkady Abaza ABBA Claudio Abbado Nicola Abbagnano Janet Abbate Ernst Abbe Edwin Abbott Abbott Frederick M. Abbott Thomas Kingsmill Abbott Abd al-Rahman III Emil Abderhalden ʻAbdu'l-Bahá Ramazan Abdulatipov Mohamed Diriye Abdullahi Chingiz Abdullayev Kamal Mehdi Abdullayev Kōbō Abe Masao Abe Shinzo Abe Martin Abegg Artashes Abeghyan Brian Abel-Smith Carl Friedrich Abel Elie Abel Richard Abel (cultural historian) Richard Abel (lawyer) Peter Abelard Inga Ābele Hal Abelson Karl Aben Hermann Abendroth Wolfgang Abendroth Miguel Abensour Michael Abercrombie Minnie Abercrombie Penny Abernathy Giorgio Abetti Abgar V Åbo Akademi University Gundars Āboliņš Armands Ābols William Emmanuel Abraham Peter Abrahams Marina Abramović M. H. Abrams Peter Abrassimov José Antonio Abreu Zequinha de Abreu Victoria Abril Dannie Abse Franz Abt David Abulafia Académie royale de langue et de littérature françaises de Belgique Academy of St Martin in the Fields Guy Achard Amitav Acharya Chinua Achebe Achilles Tatius Elizabeth Achtemeier Herbert Achternbusch Cristina Acidini Kathy Acker Lauren Ackerman Wilhelm Ackermann Russell L. Ackoff Peter Ackroyd Joan Acocella Nicola Acocella Allan Acosta Claudio Acquaviva Zoltan Acs Edward Acton (academic) H. B. Acton Harold Acton John Dalberg-Acton, 1st Baron Acton Hernando de Acuña Amir Aczel Adam Haslmayr Adam of Bremen Adolphe Adam Barbara Adam Claus Adam Karl Adam (theologian) Paul Adam (French novelist) Salimbene di Adam Theo Adam Wilhelm Adam Emil Adamič Anatoly Adamishin Salvatore Adamo Grigory Adamov Georgy Adamovich Arlin M. Adams Bryan Adams Douglas Adams Henry Adams John Adams John Adams (composer) John Quincy Adams Richard Adams Robert Adams (photographer) Sarah Fuller Flower Adams Scott Adams Thomas Sewall Adams Walter Adams (economist) Jean Adamson Peter Adamson (philosopher) Eriks Ādamsons Mariella Adani Charles Addams Dawn Addams Jane Addams Cannonball Adderley Nat Adderley Richard Addinsell John Addison (1765–1844) Joseph Addison Paul Addison K. Alexander Adelaar Adelaide of Italy Johann Christoph Adelung Adémar de Chabannes Konrad Adenauer Clément Ader Jean Adhémar Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie Ichak Adizes Isabelle Adjani Jussi Adler-Olsen Freda Adler Gerhard Adler Irving Adler Kurt Adler Larry Adler Renata Adler Richard Adler Eufemia von Adlersfeld-Ballestrem Svenja Adolphs Andrew Adonis, Baron Adonis Vladimir Adoratsky Rolena Adorno Theodor W. Adorno Götz Adriani Adunis Endre Ady Aelius Theon Aeschylus Aesop Georgiy Afanasyev Elchin Afandiyev Alexander Afinogenov Roman Aftanazy Hanne Aga Georges Agabekov Giorgio Agamben Herbert Agar Agostino Agazzari James Agee Philip Agee Michael Agerskov M. Ageyev François d'Agincourt Shmuel Yosef Agnon Lodovico Agostini Ali M. El-Agraa Evgeny Agranovich Gösta Ågren Dionisio Aguado y García Grace Aguilar Julian Agyeman Lucy Aharish Lars Ahlfors Bruce Ahlstrand Rudolf Ahlswede Mirza Basheer-ud-Din Mahmood Ahmad Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Akbar Ahmed Sara Ahmed Shahab Ahmed Claes-Håkan Ahnsjö Juhani Aho Kalevi Aho Wilhelm Ahrens Eija-Liisa Ahtila Otl Aicher (previous page) (next page) Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Wikipedia_articles_with_LNB_identifiers&oldid=847591728" Categories: Pages with LNB identifiers Wikipedia articles with authority control information Hidden categories: Hidden categories Tracking categories Template Large category TOC via CatAutoTOC on category with 10,001–20,000 pages CatAutoTOC generates Large category TOC Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Category Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Afrikaans Български 한국어 Ilokano Bahasa Indonesia עברית Bahasa Melayu 日本語 Română Sardu Scots සිංහල Simple English Suomi Türkçe 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 26 June 2018, at 13:03 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2018 ---- Polybius - Wikipedia Polybius From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Ancient Greek historian For other uses, see Polybius (disambiguation). This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Polybius" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (May 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) Polybius The stele of Kleitor depicting Polybius, Hellenistic art, 2nd century BC, Museum of Roman Civilization.[1] Born c. 200 BC Megalopolis, Arcadia Died c. 118 BC Roman Greece Nationality Greek Occupation Historian Notable work The Histories, events of the Roman Republic, 220–146 BC Polybius (/pəˈlɪbiəs/; Greek: Πολύβιος, Polýbios; c. 200 – c. 118 BC[2]) was a Greek historian of the Hellenistic period noted for his work The Histories, which covered the period of 264–146 BC in detail. The work describes the rise of the Roman Republic to the status of dominance in the ancient Mediterranean world. It includes his eyewitness account of the Sack of Carthage and Corinth in 146 BC, and the Roman annexation of mainland Greece after the Achaean War. Polybius is important for his analysis of the mixed constitution or the separation of powers in government, which was influential on Montesquieu's The Spirit of the Laws and the framers of the United States Constitution. He was also noted for witnessing the events that he recorded.[3] The leading expert on Polybius was F. W. Walbank (1909–2008), who for 50 years published studies related to him, including a long commentary of his Histories and a biography.[4] Contents 1 Origins 2 Personal experiences 3 At Rome 4 The Histories 4.1 Sources 5 As historian 6 Cryptography 7 Influence 8 Editions and translations 9 See also 10 Notes and references 11 Sources 11.1 Ancient sources 11.2 Modern sources 12 Further reading 13 External links Origins[edit] Polybius was born around 208 BC in Megalopolis, Arcadia,[5] when it was an active member of the Achaean League. The town was revived, along with other Achaean states, a century before he was born.[6] Polybius' father, Lycortas, was a prominent, land-owning politician and member of the governing class who became strategos (commanding general) of the Achaean League.[7] Consequently, Polybius was able to observe first hand during his first 40 years the political and military affairs of Megalopolis, gaining experience as a statesman.[5] In his early years, he accompanied his father while travelling as ambassador.[8] He developed an interest in horse riding and hunting, diversions that later commended him to his Roman captors. In 182 BC, he was given quite an honor when he was chosen to carry the funeral urn of Philopoemen, one of the most eminent Achaean politicians of his generation. In either 169 BC or 170 BC, Polybius was elected hipparchus (cavalry officer) with the intention of fighting for Rome during the Third Macedonian War.[8] This event often presaged election to the annual strategia (chief generalship). His early political career was devoted largely towards maintaining the independence of Megalopolis.[citation needed] Personal experiences[edit] Polybius’ father, Lycortas, was a prominent advocate of neutrality during the Roman war against Perseus of Macedon. Lycortas attracted the suspicion of the Romans, and Polybius subsequently was one of the 1,000 Achaean nobles who were transported to Rome as hostages in 167 BC, and was detained there for 17 years. In Rome, by virtue of his high culture, Polybius was admitted to the most distinguished houses, in particular to that of Lucius Aemilius Paullus Macedonicus, the conqueror in the Third Macedonian War, who entrusted Polybius with the education of his sons, Fabius and Scipio Aemilianus (who had been adopted by the eldest son of Scipio Africanus). Polybius remained on cordial terms with his former pupil Scipio Aemilianus and was among the members of the Scipionic Circle. When Scipio defeated the Carthaginians in the Third Punic War, Polybius remained his counsellor. The Achaean hostages were released in 150 BC, and Polybius was granted leave to return home, but the next year he went on campaign with Scipio Aemilianus to Africa, and was present at the Sack of Carthage in 146, which he later described. Following the destruction of Carthage, Polybius likely journeyed along the Atlantic coast of Africa, as well as Spain. After the destruction of Corinth in the same year, Polybius returned to Greece, making use of his Roman connections to lighten the conditions there. Polybius was charged with the difficult task of organizing the new form of government in the Greek cities, and in this office he gained great recognition. At Rome[edit] In the succeeding years, Polybius resided in Rome, completing his historical work while occasionally undertaking long journeys through the Mediterranean countries in the furtherance of his history, in particular with the aim of obtaining firsthand knowledge of historical sites. He apparently interviewed veterans to clarify details of the events he was recording and was similarly given access to archival material. Little is known of Polybius' later life; he most likely accompanied Scipio to Spain, acting as his military advisor during the Numantine War. He later wrote about this war in a lost monograph. Polybius probably returned to Greece later in his life, as evidenced by the many existent inscriptions and statues of him there. The last event mentioned in his Histories seems to be the construction of the Via Domitia in southern France in 118 BC, which suggests the writings of Pseudo-Lucian may have some grounding in fact when they state, "[Polybius] fell from his horse while riding up from the country, fell ill as a result and died at the age of eighty-two". The Histories[edit] Main article: The Histories (Polybius) Polybius’ Histories cover the period from 264 BC to 146 BC. Its main focus is the period from 220 BC to 167 BC, describing Rome's efforts in subduing its arch-enemy, Carthage, and thereby becoming the dominant Mediterranean force. Books I through V of The Histories are the introduction for the years during his lifetime, describing the politics in leading Mediterranean states, including ancient Greece and Egypt, and culminating in their ultimate συμπλοκή or interconnectedness. In Book VI, Polybius describes the political, military, and moral institutions that allowed the Romans to succeed. He describes the First and Second Punic Wars. Polybius concludes the Romans are the pre-eminent power because they have customs and institutions which promote a deep desire for noble acts, a love of virtue, piety towards parents and elders, and a fear of the gods (deisidaimonia). He also chronicled the conflicts between Hannibal and Publius Cornelius Scipio Africanus such as the Battle of Ticinus, the Battle of the Trebia, the Siege of Saguntum, the Battle of Lilybaeum, and the Battle of Rhone Crossing. In Book XII, Polybius discusses the worth of Timaeus’ account of the same period of history. He asserts Timaeus' point of view is inaccurate, invalid, and biased in favor of Rome. Therefore, Polybius's Histories is also useful in analyzing the different Hellenistic versions of history and of use as a credible illustration of actual events during the Hellenistic period. Sources[edit] In the twelfth volume of his Histories, Polybius defines the historian's job as the analysis of documentation, the review of relevant geographical information, and political experience. Polybius held that historians should only chronicle events whose participants the historian was able to interview,[9] and was among the first to champion the notion of factual integrity in historical writing. In Polybius' time, the profession of a historian required political experience (which aided in differentiating between fact and fiction) and familiarity with the geography surrounding one's subject matter to supply an accurate version of events. Polybius himself exemplified these principles as he was well travelled and possessed political and military experience. He did not neglect written sources that provided essential material for his histories of the period from 264 BC to 220 BC. When addressing events after 220 BC, he examined the writings of Greek and Roman historians to acquire credible sources of information, but rarely did he name those sources. As historian[edit] Polybius wrote several works, the majority of which are lost. His earliest work was a biography of the Greek statesman Philopoemen; this work was later used as a source by Plutarch when composing his Parallel Lives, however the original Polybian text is lost. In addition, Polybius wrote an extensive treatise entitled Tactics, which may have detailed Roman and Greek military tactics. Small parts of this work may survive in his major Histories, but the work itself is lost, as well. Another missing work was a historical monograph on the events of the Numantine War. The largest Polybian work was, of course, his Histories, of which only the first five books survive entirely intact, along with a large portion of the sixth book and fragments of the rest. Along with Cato the Elder (234–149 BC), he can be considered one of the founding fathers of Roman historiography. Livy made reference to and uses Polybius' Histories as source material in his own narrative. Polybius was among the first historians to attempt to present history as a sequence of causes and effects, based upon a careful examination and criticism of tradition. He narrated his history based upon first-hand knowledge. The Histories capture the varied elements of the story of human behavior: nationalism, xenophobia, duplicitous politics, war, brutality, loyalty, valour, intelligence, reason, and resourcefulness. Aside from the narrative of the historical events, Polybius also included three books of digressions. Book 34 was entirely devoted to questions of geography and included some trenchant criticisms of Eratosthenes, whom he accused of passing on popular preconceptions or laodogmatika. Book 12 was a disquisition on the writing of history, citing extensive passages of lost historians, such as Callisthenes and Theopompus. Most influential was Book 6, which describes Roman political, military, and moral institutions, which he considered key to Rome's success; it presented Rome as having a mixed constitution in which monarchical, aristocratic, and popular elements existed in stable equilibrium. This enabled Rome to escape, for the time being, the cycle of eternal revolutions (anacyclosis). While Polybius was not the first to advance this view, his account provides the most cogent illustration of the ideal for later political theorists. A key theme of The Histories is the good statesman as virtuous and composed. The character of the Polybian statesman is exemplified in that of Philip II. His beliefs about Philip's character led Polybius to reject historian Theopompus' description of Philip's private, drunken debauchery. For Polybius, it was inconceivable that such an able and effective statesman could have had an immoral and unrestrained private life as described by Theopompus.[10] In recounting the Roman Republic, Polybius stated that "the Senate stands in awe of the multitude, and cannot neglect the feelings of the people".[11] Other important themes running through The Histories are the role of Fortune in the affairs of nations, his insistence that history should be demonstratory, or apodeiktike, providing lessons for statesmen, and that historians should be "men of action" (pragmatikoi). Polybius is considered by some to be the successor of Thucydides in terms of objectivity and critical reasoning, and the forefather of scholarly, painstaking historical research in the modern scientific sense. According to this view, his work sets forth the course of history's occurrences with clearness, penetration, sound judgment, and, among the circumstances affecting the outcomes, he lays special emphasis on geographical conditions. Modern historians are especially impressed with the manner in which Polybius used his sources, particularly documentary evidence as well as his citation and quotation of sources. Furthermore, there is some admiration of Polybius's meditation on the nature of historiography in Book 12. His work belongs, therefore, amongst the greatest productions of ancient historical writing. The writer of the Oxford Companion to Classical Literature (1937) praises him for his "earnest devotion to truth" and his systematic pursuit of causation. It has long been acknowledged that Polybius's writings are prone to a certain hagiographic tone when writing of his friends, such as Scipio, and subject to a vindictive tone when detailing the exploits of his enemies, such as Callicrates, the Achaean statesman responsible for his Roman exile.[12] As a hostage in Rome, then as client to the Scipios, and after 146 BC, a collaborator with Roman rule, Polybius was probably in no position to freely express any negative opinions of Rome. Peter Green advises that Polybius was chronicling Roman history for a Greek audience, to justify what he believed to be the inevitability of Roman rule. Nonetheless, Green considers Polybius's Histories the best source for the era they cover. For Ronald Mellor, Polybius was a loyal partisan of Scipio, intent on vilifying his patron's opponents.[13] Adrian Goldsworthy, while using Polybius as a source for Scipio's generalship, notes Polybius' underlying and overt bias in Scipio's favour. H. Ormerod considers that Polybius cannot be regarded as an 'altogether unprejudiced witness' in relation to his betes noires; the Aetolians, the Carthaginians, and the Cretans.[14] Other historians perceive considerable negative bias in Polybius' account of Crete;[15] on the other hand, Hansen notes that the same work, along with passages from Strabo and Scylax,[16] proved a reliable guide in the eventual rediscovery of the lost city of Kydonia.[17] Cryptography[edit] Polybius was responsible for a useful tool in telegraphy that allowed letters to be easily signaled using a numerical system, called "the Polybius square". (mentioned in Hist. X.45.6 ff.). This idea also lends itself to cryptographic manipulation and steganography. 1 2 3 4 5 1 A B C D E 2 F G H I/J K 3 L M N O P 4 Q R S T U 5 V W X Y Z This was known as the "Polybius square", where the letters of the alphabet were arranged left to right, top to bottom in a 5 x 5 square, (when used with the modern 26 letter alphabet, the letters "I" and "J" are combined). Five numbers were then aligned on the outside top of the square, and five numbers on the left side of the square vertically. Usually these numbers were arranged 1 through 5. By cross-referencing the two numbers along the grid of the square, a letter could be deduced. In The Histories, he specifies how this cypher could be used in fire signals, where long-range messages could be sent by means of torches raised and lowered to signify the column and row of each letter. This was a great leap forward from previous fire signaling, which could send prearranged codes only (such as, 'if we light the fire, it means that the enemy has arrived'). Other writings of scientific interest include detailed discussions of the machines Archimedes created for the defense of Syracuse against the Romans, where he praises the 'old man' and his engineering in the highest terms, and an analysis of the usefulness of astronomy to generals (both in the Histories). Influence[edit] Part of the Politics series on Republicanism Central concepts Anti-monarchism Liberty as non-domination Popular sovereignty Republic Res publica Social contract Schools Classical Federal Kemalism Nasserism Neo-republicanism Venizelism Types of republics Autonomous Capitalist Christian Corporate Democratic Federal Federal parliamentary Islamic Parliamentary People's Revolutionary Sister Soviet Important thinkers Hannah Arendt Cicero James Harrington Thomas Jefferson John Locke James Madison Montesquieu Polybius Jean-Jacques Rousseau Algernon Sidney Mary Wollstonecraft History Roman Republic Gaṇa sangha Classical Athens Republic of Venice Republic of Genoa Republic of Florence Dutch Republic American Revolution French Revolution Spanish American wars of independence Trienio Liberal French Revolution of 1848 5 October 1910 revolution Chinese Revolution Russian Revolution German Revolution of 1918–19 Turkish War of Independence Mongolian Revolution of 1921 11 September 1922 Revolution 1935 Greek coup d'état attempt Spanish Civil War 1946 Italian institutional referendum Egyptian revolution of 1952 14 July Revolution North Yemen Civil War Zanzibar Revolution 1969 Libyan coup d'état Cambodian coup of 1970 Metapolitefsi Iranian Revolution 1987 Fijian coups d'état Nepalese Civil War By country Australia Barbados Canada Ireland Jamaica Japan Morocco Netherlands New Zealand Norway Spain Sweden Turkey United Kingdom Scotland United States Related topics Communitarianism Democracy Liberalism Monarchism Politics portal v t e Marcus Tullius Cicero Polybius was considered a poor stylist by Dionysius of Halicarnassus, writing of Polybius' history that "no one has the endurance to reach [its] end".[18] Nevertheless, clearly he was widely read by Romans and Greeks alike. He is quoted extensively by Strabo writing in the 1st century BC and Athenaeus in the 3rd century AD. His emphasis on explaining causes of events, rather than just recounting events, influenced the historian Sempronius Asellio. Polybius is mentioned by Cicero and mined for information by Diodorus, Livy, Plutarch and Arrian. Much of the text that survives today from the later books of The Histories was preserved in Byzantine anthologies. Montesquieu His works reappeared in the West first in Renaissance Florence. Polybius gained a following in Italy, and although poor Latin translations hampered proper scholarship on his works, they contributed to the city's historical and political discourse. Niccolò Machiavelli in his Discourses on Livy evinces familiarity with Polybius. Vernacular translations in French, German, Italian and English first appeared during the 16th century.[19] Consequently, in the late 16th century, Polybius's works found a greater reading audience among the learned public. Study of the correspondence of such men as Isaac Casaubon, Jacques Auguste de Thou, William Camden, and Paolo Sarpi reveals a growing interest in Polybius' works and thought during the period. Despite the existence of both printed editions in the vernacular and increased scholarly interest, however, Polybius remained an "historian's historian", not much read by the public at large.[20] Printings of his work in the vernacular remained few in number — seven in French, five in English,(John Dryden provided an enthusiastic preface to Sir Henry Sheers' edition of 1693) and five in Italian.[21] Polybius' political analysis has influenced republican thinkers from Cicero to Charles de Montesquieu to the Founding Fathers of the United States.[22] John Adams, for example, considered him one of the most important teachers of constitutional theory. Since the Age of Enlightenment, Polybius has in general held appeal to those interested in Hellenistic Greece and early Republican Rome, while his political and military writings have lost influence in academia. More recently, thorough work on the Greek text of Polybius, and his historical technique, has increased the academic understanding and appreciation of him as a historian. According to Edward Tufte, he was also a major source for Charles Joseph Minard's figurative map of Hannibal's overland journey into Italy during the Second Punic War.[23] In his Meditations On Hunting, Spanish philosopher José Ortega y Gasset calls Polybius "one of the few great minds that the turbid human species has managed to produce", and says the damage to the Histories is "without question one of the gravest losses that we have suffered in our Greco-Roman heritage". The Italian version of his name, Polibio, was used as a male first name - for example, the composer Polibio Fumagalli - though it never became very common. The University of Pennsylvania has an intellectual society, the Polybian Society, which is named in his honor and serves as a non-partisan forum for discussing societal issues and policy. Editions and translations[edit] Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Usher, S. (ed. and trans.) Critical Essays, Volume II. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985. Polybii Historiae, editionem a Ludovico Dindorfi curatam, retractavit Theodorus Büttner-Wobst, Lipsiae in aedibus B. G. Teubneri, vol. 1, vol. 2, vol. 3, vol. 4, vol. 5, 1882-1904. Polybius (1922–1927). Polybius: The Histories. The Loeb Classical Library (in Ancient Greek, English, and Latin). Translated by Paton, W.R. London; New York: William Heinemann; G.P. Putnam's Sone. —— (1922A). Polybius. Volume I. ISBN 0-674-99142-7. Loeb Number L128; Books I-II. —— (1922B). Polybius. Volume II. ISBN 0-674-99152-4. Loeb Number L137; Books III-IV. —— (1923). Polybius. Volume III. ISBN 0-674-99153-2. Loeb Number L138; Books V-VIII. —— (1925). Polybius. Volume IV. ISBN 0-674-99175-3. Loeb Number L159; Books IX-XV. —— (1926). Polybius. Volume V. ISBN 0-674-99176-1. Loeb Number L160; Books XVI-XXVII. —— (1927). Polybius. Volume VI. ISBN 0-674-99178-8. Loeb Number L161; Books XXVIII-XXXIX. Polybius (2012). Polybius: The Histories. The Loeb Classical Library (in Ancient Greek, English, and Latin). Translated by Paton, W.R. Chicago: University of Chicago (LacusCurtius). The Histories or The Rise of the Roman Empire by Polybius: At Perseus Project: English & Greek version At "LacusCurtius": Short introduction to the life and work of Polybius 1670 edition of Polybius' works vol.1 at the Internet archive 1670 edition of Polybius' works vol.2 at the Internet archive Polybius: "The Rise Of The Roman Empire", Penguin, 1979. "Books 1–5 of History. Ethiopian Story. Book 8: From the Departure of the Divine Marcus" featuring Book I-V of The Histories, digitized, from the World Digital Library See also[edit] Anacyclosis Kyklos The Histories Polybius square Polybius (urban legend) Mixed government Notes and references[edit] ^ John Ma. (2013). Statues and Cities: Honorific Portraits and Civic Identity in the Hellenistic World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-966891-5, pp 281-282. ^ Derow 2016. ^ Brunschwig, Jacques; Lloyd, Geoffrey Ernest Richard; Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R.; Pellegrin, Pierre (2003). A Guide to Greek Thought: Major Figures and Trends. London: Harvard University Press. p. 190. ISBN 0-674-02156-8. ^ Gibson & Harrison: Polybius, pp. 1–5. ^ a b Walbank, F. W. (2014). Philip V of Macedon. New York: Cambridge University Press. p. 278. ISBN 978-1-107-63060-4. ^ On Writing History from Herodotus to Herodian. Penguin UK. 2017-12-07. ISBN 978-0-14-139358-2. ^ "Titus Livius (Livy), The History of Rome, Book 39, chapter 35". www.perseus.tufts.edu. Retrieved 2016-11-02. ^ a b Sorek, Susan (2012). Ancient Historians: A Student Handbook. London: Continuum. p. 76. ISBN 978-1-4411-1135-7. ^ Farrington, Scott Thomas (February 2015). "A Likely Story: Rhetoric and the Determination of Truth in Polybius’ Histories." Histos 9: 29-66. (p. 40): "Polybius begins his history proper with the 140th Olympiad because accounts of the remote past amount to hearsay and do not allow for safe judgements (διαλήψεις) and assertions (ἀποφάσεις) regarding the course of events.... he can relate events he saw himself, or he can use the testimony of eyewitnesses. ([footnote 34]: Pol. 4.2.2: ἐξ οὗ συµβαίνει τοῖς µὲν αὐτοὺς ἡµᾶς παραγεγονέναι, τὰ δὲ παρὰ τῶν ἑωρακότων ἀκηκοέναι.)" [archive URLs: 1 (full text), 2 (abstract & journal citation)] ^ Hannibal at New Carthage: Polybius 3. 15 and the Power of Irrationality Author: A. M. Eckstein, Classical Philology, Vol. 84, No. 1 (January 1989), pp. 3-4 ^ Polybius on the Senate and People (6.16) from Perseus Digital Library at Tufts University ^ Peter Green, Alexander to Actium ^ The Historians of Ancient Rome, Ronald J. Mellor ^ Piracy in the Ancient World, p141 H Ormerod ^ Mogens Herman Hansen 1995, Sources for the Ancient Greek City-State: Symposium, August 24–27, 1994, Kgl. Danske, Videnskabernes Selskab, 376 pages ISBN 87-7304-267-6 ^ Robert Pashley, Travels in Crete, 1837, J. Murray ^ "C. Michael Hogan, Cydonia, Modern Antiquarian, January 23, 2008". Themodernantiquarian.com. Retrieved 2010-02-28. ^ Comp. 4 ^ Polybius; Frank W. Walbank; Ian Scott-Kilvert (1979). The Rise of the Roman Empire. Penguin Classics. ISBN 0-14-044362-2. ^ Burke, Peter (1966). "A Survey of the Popularity of Ancient Historians, 1450-1700". History and Theory. History and Theory, Vol. 5, No. 2. 5 (2): 135–152 [141]. doi:10.2307/2504511. JSTOR 2504511. ^ Burke, Peter (1966). "A Survey of the Popularity of Ancient Historians, 1450-1700". History and Theory. History and Theory, Vol. 5, No. 2. 5 (2): 135–152 [139]. doi:10.2307/2504511. JSTOR 2504511. ^ Marshall Davies Lloyd, Polybius and the Founding Fathers: the separation of powers, Sept. 22, 1998. ^ "Minard's figurative map of Hannibal's war". Edwardtufte.com. Retrieved 2010-02-28. Sources[edit] Ancient sources[edit] Titus Livius of Patavium (Livy), libri XXI — XLV Pseudo-Lucian Makrobioi Paulus Orosius libri VII of Histories against Pagans Modern sources[edit] Davidson, James: 'Polybius' in Feldherr, Andrew ed. The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Historians (Cambridge University Press, 2009) Derow, Peter S. (2016). "Polybius (1), Greek historian, c. 200–c. 118 BCE". Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Classics. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199381135.001.0001 (inactive 2020-10-28).CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of October 2020 (link) Gibson, Bruce & Harrison, Thomas (editors): Polybius and his World: Essays in Memory of F.W. Walbank, (Oxford, 2013). Momigliano, Arnaldo M.: Sesto Contributo alla Storia degli Studi Classici e del Mondo Antico (Rome, 1980) —— Vol. V (1974) "The Historian's Skin”, 77–88 (Momigliano Bibliography no. 531) —— Vol. VI (1973) “Polibio, Posidonio e l'imperialismo Romano”, 89 (Momigliano Bibliography no. 525) (original publication: Atti della Accademia delle Scienze di Torino, 107, 1972–73, 693–707) Moore, John M: The Manuscript Tradition of Polybius (Cambridge University Press, 1965) Walbank, Frank W: —— Philip V of Macedon, the Hare Prize Essay 1939 (Cambridge University Press, 1940) —— A Historical Commentary on Polybius (Oxford University Press) Vol. I (1957) Commentary on Books I–VI Vol. II (1967) Commentary on Books VII–XVIII Vol. III (1979) Commentary on Books XIX–XL —— Polybius (University of California Press, 1972) Further reading[edit] Champion, Craige B. 2004. Cultural Politics in Polybius’s Histories. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press. Derow, Peter S. 1979. "Polybius, Rome, and the East." Journal of Roman Studies 69:1–15. Eckstein, Arthur M. 1995. Moral Vision in the Histories of Polybius. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press. Farrington, Scott Thomas. 2015. "A Likely Story: Rhetoric and the Determination of Truth in Polybius’ Histories. Histos: The On-Line Journal of Ancient Historiography 9: 29-66. McGing, Brian C. 2010. Polybius: The Histories. Oxford Approaches to Classical Literature. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. Moore, Daniel Walker. 2017. "Learning from Experience: Polybius and the Progress of Rome." Classical Quarterly 67.1: 132-148. Pausch, Dennis. 2014. "Livy Reading Polybius: Adapting Greek Narrative to Roman History." In Defining Greek Narrative. Edited by Douglas L. Cairns and Ruth Scodel, 279-297. Edinburgh : Edinburgh University Press. Sacks, Kenneth S. 1981. Polybius on the Writing of History. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press. Schepens, Guido, and Jan Bollansée, eds. 2005. The Shadow of Polybius: Intertextuality as a Research Tool in Greek Historiography. Leuven, Belgium: Peeters. Walbank, Frank W. 2002. Polybius, Rome and the Hellenistic World: Essays and Reflections. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press. External links[edit] Greek Wikisource has original text related to this article: Ἱστορίαι Library resources about Polybius Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries By Polybius Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries Quotations related to Polybius at Wikiquote Works written by or about Polybius at Wikisource Works by Polybius at Project Gutenberg Works by Polybius at Perseus Digital Library Works by or about Polybius at Internet Archive v t e Social and political philosophy Ancient philosophers Aristotle Chanakya Cicero Confucius Han Fei Lactantius Laozi Mencius Mozi Origen Plato Polybius Shang Socrates Sun Tzu Tertullian Thucydides Valluvar Xenophon Xunzi Medieval philosophers Alpharabius Augustine Averroes Baldus Bartolus Bruni Dante Gelasius al-Ghazali Giles Hostiensis Ibn Khaldun John of Paris John of Salisbury Latini Maimonides Marsilius Nizam al-Mulk Photios Thomas Aquinas Wang William of Ockham Early modern philosophers Beza Bodin Bossuet Botero Buchanan Calvin Cumberland Duplessis-Mornay Erasmus Filmer Grotius Guicciardini Harrington Hayashi Hobbes Hotman Huang Leibniz Locke Luther Machiavelli Malebranche Mariana Milton Montaigne More Müntzer Naudé Pufendorf Rohan Sansovino Sidney Spinoza Suárez 18th–19th-century philosophers Bakunin Bentham Bonald Bosanquet Burke Comte Constant Emerson Engels Fichte Fourier Franklin Godwin Hamann Hegel Herder Hume Jefferson Justi Kant political philosophy Kierkegaard Le Bon Le Play Madison Maistre Marx Mazzini Mill Montesquieu Möser Nietzsche Novalis Paine Renan Rousseau Royce Sade Schiller Smith Spencer Stirner Taine Thoreau Tocqueville Vico Vivekananda Voltaire 20th–21st-century philosophers Adorno Ambedkar Arendt Aurobindo Aron Azurmendi Badiou Baudrillard Bauman Benoist Berlin Bernstein Butler Camus Chomsky De Beauvoir Debord Du Bois Durkheim Dworkin Foucault Gandhi Gauthier Gehlen Gentile Gramsci Habermas Hayek Heidegger Irigaray Kautsky Kirk Kropotkin Laclau Lenin Luxemburg Mao Mansfield Marcuse Maritain Michels Mises Mou Mouffe Negri Niebuhr Nozick Nursî Oakeshott Ortega Pareto Pettit Plamenatz Polanyi Popper Qutb Radhakrishnan Rand Rawls Rothbard Russell Santayana Sartre Scanlon Schmitt Searle Shariati Simmel Simonović Skinner Sombart Sorel Spann Spirito Strauss Sun Taylor Walzer Weber Žižek Social theories Anarchism Authoritarianism Collectivism Communism Communitarianism Conflict theories Confucianism Consensus theory Conservatism Contractualism Cosmopolitanism Culturalism Fascism Feminist political theory Gandhism Individualism Islam Islamism Legalism Liberalism Libertarianism Mohism National liberalism Republicanism Social constructionism Social constructivism Social Darwinism Social determinism Socialism Utilitarianism Concepts Civil disobedience Democracy Four occupations Justice Law Mandate of Heaven Peace Property Revolution Rights Social contract Society War more... Related articles Jurisprudence Philosophy and economics Philosophy of education Philosophy of history Philosophy of love Philosophy of sex Philosophy of social science Political ethics Social epistemology Category v t e Ancient Greece Timeline History Geography Periods Cycladic civilization Minoan civilization Mycenaean civilization Greek Dark Ages Archaic period Classical Greece Hellenistic Greece Roman Greece Geography Aegean Sea Aeolis Alexandria Antioch Cappadocia Crete Cyprus Doris Ephesus Epirus Hellespont Ionia Ionian Sea Macedonia Magna Graecia Miletus Peloponnesus Pergamon Pontus Taurica Ancient Greek colonies City states Politics Military City states Argos Athens Byzantion Chalcis Corinth Eretria Kerkyra Larissa Megalopolis Megara Rhodes Samos Sparta Syracuse Thebes Politics Boule Koinon Proxeny Tagus Tyrant Amphictyonic League Athenian Agora Areopagus Ecclesia Graphe paranomon Heliaia Ostracism Spartan Apella Ephor Gerousia Macedon Synedrion Koinon Military Wars Athenian military Scythian archers Antigonid Macedonian army Army of Macedon Ballista Cretan archers Hellenistic armies Hippeis Hoplite Hetairoi Macedonian phalanx Phalanx Peltast Pezhetairos Sarissa Sacred Band of Thebes Sciritae Seleucid army Spartan army Strategos Toxotai Xiphos Xyston People List of ancient Greeks Rulers Kings of Argos Archons of Athens Kings of Athens Kings of Commagene Diadochi Kings of Lydia Kings of Macedonia Kings of Paionia Attalid kings of Pergamon Kings of Pontus Kings of Sparta Tyrants of Syracuse Philosophers Anaxagoras Anaximander Anaximenes Antisthenes Aristotle Democritus Diogenes of Sinope Empedocles Epicurus Gorgias Heraclitus Hypatia Leucippus Parmenides Plato Protagoras Pythagoras Socrates Thales Zeno Authors Aeschylus Aesop Alcaeus Archilochus Aristophanes Bacchylides Euripides Herodotus Hesiod Hipponax Homer Ibycus Lucian Menander Mimnermus Panyassis Philocles Pindar Plutarch Polybius Sappho Simonides Sophocles Stesichorus Theognis Thucydides Timocreon Tyrtaeus Xenophon Others Agesilaus II Agis II Alcibiades Alexander the Great Aratus Archimedes Aspasia Demosthenes Epaminondas Euclid Hipparchus Hippocrates Leonidas Lycurgus Lysander Milo of Croton Miltiades Pausanias Pericles Philip of Macedon Philopoemen Praxiteles Ptolemy Pyrrhus Solon Themistocles Groups Philosophers Playwrights Poets Tyrants By culture Ancient Greek tribes Thracian Greeks Ancient Macedonians Society Culture Society Agriculture Calendar Clothing Coinage Cuisine Economy Education Festivals Homosexuality Law Olympic Games Pederasty Philosophy Prostitution Religion Slavery Warfare Wedding customs Wine Arts and science Architecture Greek Revival architecture Astronomy Literature Mathematics Medicine Music Musical system Pottery Sculpture Technology Theatre Religion Funeral and burial practices Mythology mythological figures Temple Twelve Olympians Underworld Sacred places Eleusis Delphi Delos Dion Dodona Mount Olympus Olympia Structures Athenian Treasury Lion Gate Long Walls Philippeion Theatre of Dionysus Tunnel of Eupalinos Temples Aphaea Artemis Athena Nike Erechtheion Hephaestus Hera, Olympia Parthenon Samothrace Zeus, Olympia Language Proto-Greek Mycenaean Homeric Dialects Aeolic Arcadocypriot Attic Doric Ionic Locrian Macedonian Pamphylian Koine Writing Linear A Linear B Cypriot syllabary Greek alphabet Greek numerals Attic numerals Greek colonisation South Italy Alision Brentesion Caulonia Chone Croton Cumae Elea Heraclea Lucania Hipponion Hydrus Krimisa Laüs Locri Medma Metapontion Neápolis Pandosia (Lucania) Poseidonia Pixous Rhegion Scylletium Siris Sybaris Sybaris on the Traeis Taras Terina Thurii Sicily Akragas Akrai Akrillai Apollonia Calacte Casmenae Catana Gela Helorus Henna Heraclea Minoa Himera Hybla Gereatis Hybla Heraea Kamarina Leontinoi Megara Hyblaea Messana Naxos Segesta Selinous Syracuse Tauromenion Thermae Tyndaris Aeolian Islands Didyme Euonymos Ereikousa Hycesia Lipara/Meligounis Phoenicusa Strongyle Therassía Sardinia Olbia Cyrenaica Balagrae Barca Berenice Cyrene (Apollonia) Ptolemais Iberian Peninsula Akra Leuke Alonis Emporion Helike Hemeroscopion Kalathousa Kypsela Mainake Menestheus's Limin Illicitanus Limin/Portus Illicitanus Rhode Salauris Zacynthos Black Sea north coast Borysthenes Charax Chersonesus Dioscurias Eupatoria Gorgippia Hermonassa Kepoi Kimmerikon Myrmekion Nikonion Nymphaion Olbia Panticapaion Phanagoria Pityus Tanais Theodosia Tyras Tyritake Black Sea south coast Dionysopolis Odessos Anchialos Mesambria Apollonia Salmydessus Heraclea Tium Sesamus Cytorus Abonoteichos Sinope Zaliche Amisos Oinòe Polemonion Thèrmae Cotyora Kerasous Tripolis Trapezous Rhizos Athina Bathus Phasis Lists Cities in Epirus People Place names Stoae Temples Theatres Category Portal Outline Authority control BIBSYS: 90227513 BNE: XX841423 BNF: cb11920194q (data) CANTIC: a11793727 CiNii: DA01312290 GND: 118595571 HDS: 010310 ISNI: 0000 0001 2098 7680 LCCN: n79006487 LNB: 000054644 NDL: 00978029 NKC: jn19981002010 NLA: 35427923 NLG: 27974 NLI: 000106845 NSK: 000182909 NTA: 069071578 RERO: 02-A000131908 SELIBR: 196601 SUDOC: 027352188 Trove: 948986 VcBA: 495/20452 VIAF: 267920293 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n79006487 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Polybius&oldid=995475693" Categories: 2nd-century BC Greek people 2nd-century BC historians Ancient Arcadians Ancient Greek statesmen Ancient Megalopolitans Hellenistic-era historians Historians of Roman Achaea Roman-era Greek historians 200s BC births 110s BC deaths Hidden categories: Articles with short description Short description matches Wikidata Articles needing additional references from May 2020 All articles needing additional references Articles with hCards Articles containing Ancient Greek (to 1453)-language text All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from May 2017 CS1 foreign language sources (ISO 639-2) CS1 Latin-language sources (la) CS1: long volume value CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of October 2020 Articles with Project Gutenberg links Articles with Internet Archive links Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CANTIC identifiers Wikipedia articles with CINII identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with HDS identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with LNB identifiers Wikipedia articles with NDL identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLG identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLI identifiers Wikipedia articles with NSK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with RERO identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with Trove identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikiquote Wikisource Languages العربية Aragonés Azərbaycanca تۆرکجه বাংলা Беларуская Български Bosanski Brezhoneg Català Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français Gaeilge Galego 한국어 Հայերեն Hrvatski Ido Bahasa Indonesia Interlingua Íslenska Italiano עברית ಕನ್ನಡ ქართული Қазақша Кыргызча Latina Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar مصرى Mirandés Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Norsk nynorsk Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча Polski Português Română Русский Shqip Sicilianu Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Tagalog ไทย Türkçe Українська Tiếng Việt 吴语 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 21 December 2020, at 06:14 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2020 ---- Scriba (ancient Rome) - Wikipedia Scriba (ancient Rome) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Ancient Rome This article is part of a series on the politics and government of ancient Rome Periods Roman Kingdom 753–509 BC Roman Republic 509–27 BC Roman Empire 27 BC – AD 395 Principate 27 BC – AD 284 Dominate AD 284–641 Western AD 395–476 Eastern AD 395–1453 Timeline Roman Constitution Constitution of the Kingdom Constitution of the Republic Constitution of the Empire Constitution of the Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Executive magistrates Precedent and law Roman law Ius Imperium Mos maiorum Collegiality Auctoritas Roman citizenship Cursus honorum Senatus consultum Senatus consultum ultimum Assemblies Centuriate Curiate Plebeian Tribal Ordinary magistrates Consul Praetor Quaestor Promagistrate Aedile Tribune Censor Governor Extraordinary magistrates Corrector Dictator Magister equitum Consular tribune Rex Triumviri Decemviri Titles and honours Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Praeses Praefectus Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Other countries v t e In ancient Rome, the scriba (Latin, plural scribae[1]) was a public notary or clerk (see also scrivener). The public scribes were the highest in rank of the four prestigious occupational grades (decuriae) among the apparitores, the attendants of the magistrates who were paid from the state treasury.[2] The word scriba might also refer to a man who was a private secretary, but should be distinguished from a copyist (who might be called a "scribe" in English) or bookseller (librarius).[3] In Rome the scribae worked out of the aerarium, the state treasury and government archive. They received a good salary, but could earn additional commissions for collecting and recording state revenues, and making official copies of government documents and decrees. The Roman posting was such a lucrative assignment that the scribae worked in rotations, serving one year in Rome and two in the provinces. Those who became scribes might be freedmen (libertini) and their sons; literary or educated men who advanced to the job through patronage; or even men of the equestrian order.[4] Among the scribe's duties was the recording of sworn oaths on public tablets.[5] As a magistrate's attendant, he might also assist in religious rituals; for instance, since the exact wording of a prescribed prayer was considered vital to its success, a scribe might prompt the presiding magistrate by reading it out as recorded on official tablets.[6] By the end of the 4th century BC, the office evidently afforded several advantages, including a knowledge of Roman law that was traditionally the privilege of the elite, and the ability to trade favors that could be translated into political capital. In 305 BC, the public scribe Gnaeus Flavius, the son of a freedman, shocked the Roman upperclasses by winning election as curule aedile for the following year. Though not the first plebeian to hold the office,[7] his victory, made possible by the growing number of freedmen and those of libertine descent among the urban population, prompted the censors of 304 BC to adopt voter registration policies that curtailed the political power of the lower orders.[8] Gaius Cicereius, a former scriba of Scipio Africanus, was elected praetor in 173 BC, and enjoyed greater popularity than Scipio's own son. Certainly by the late Republic, the scribae had become a well-organized group who had achieved or were near to equestrian status.[9] The scriba Sextus Cloelius kept a high profile as an agent of the popularist Clodius Pulcher. At the beginning of Clodius's year in office as tribune of the plebs in 58 BC, Cloelius organized ludi compitalicii, neighborhood new-year festivities that had been banned as promoting unrest and political subversion. Cloelius also led the people in riots when Clodius was murdered a few years later, taking his body to the senate house and turning it into the popular leader's funeral pyre.[10] The Augustan poet Horace introduced himself in his first published book as the son of a freedman and as a civil servant, specifically a scriba quaestorius, or clerk to the quaestors who were in charge of the public treasury.[11] Further reading[edit] E. Badian, "The scribae of the Roman Republic," Klio 7 (1989) 582–603. References[edit] ^ The Latin word scriba, like poeta ("poet") and nauta ("sailor"), is a first declension noun of masculine gender. ^ The others are the lictores, "lictors"; viatores, "messengers" or "summoners," that is, agents on official errands; and praecones, "announcers" or "heralds." See Marietta Horster, "Living on Religion: Professionals and Personnel," in A Companion to Roman Religion (Blackwell, 2007), p. 334; Daniel Peretz, "The Roman Interpreter and His Diplomatic and Military Roles," Historia 55 (2006), p. 452. ^ Peter White, "Bookshops in the Literary Culture of Rome," in Ancient Literacies: The Culture of Reading in Ancient Greece and Rome (Oxford University Press, 2009), p. 269, note 4. ^ David Armstrong, Horace (Yale University Press, 1989), p. 18. ^ Clifford Ando, Imperial Ideology and Provincial Loyalty in the Roman Empire (University of California Press, 2000), p. 96. ^ Valerius Maximus 4.1.10; Eric M. Orlin, Temples, Religions, and Politics in the Roman Republic (Brill, 1997), p. 37; on the use of prompters in general, see Matthias Klinghardt, "Prayer Formularies for Public Recitation: Their Use and Function in Ancient Religion," Numen 46 (1999) 1–52. ^ T.R.S. Broughton, The Magistrates of the Roman Republic (American Philological Association, 1951, 1986), vol. 1, pp. 166–168. ^ Gary Forsythe, A Critical History of Early Rome: From Prehistory to the First Punic War (University of California Press, 2005), p. 319. ^ Forsythe, Critical History, p. 319. ^ Geoffrey S. Sumi, "Power and Ritual: The Crowd at Clodius' Funeral," Historia 46 (1997), pp. 84–85; Cynthia Damon, "Sex. Cloelius, Scriba," Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 94 (1992) 227–244, limited preview online. ^ Emily Gowers, "The Restless Companion: Horace, Satires 1 and 2," in The Cambridge Companion to Roman Satire (Cambridge University Press, 2005), p. 48. Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scriba_(ancient_Rome)&oldid=948843964" Categories: Ancient Roman government Notary Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Deutsch Português Русский Edit links This page was last edited on 3 April 2020, at 10:12 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2026 ---- Horace's Villa - Wikipedia Horace's Villa From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Horace's Villa Villa Romana di Orazio Drawing of the villa Shown within Italy Location Licenza, Province of Rome, Lazio, Italy Type Dwelling History Cultures Roman Site notes Condition Ruined Ownership Public Public access Yes Horace's Villa is a Roman archaeological complex near Licenza, Italy. The identification has been made possible because Horace wrote several poems about the place, and the location of the villa corresponds to the geographical indications in the poetry. The site can be visited today.[1] Contents 1 Identification 2 Description 3 References 4 External links Identification[edit] It was owing to references to the villa in Horace's writings that humanists attempted to find the site as early as the mid-fifteenth century, but the site in Licenza was not considered as a possible candidate for two hundred years. This changed when an inscription mentioning a temple of the goddess Victory was found in nearby Roccagiovine. Vicovaro (marked), close to Tibur on the Tabula Peutingeriana, 12-13th century Horace tells in one of his poems (Epistles 1.10) that his villa was next to the sanctuary of the Sabine goddess, Vacuna. Lucas Holstenius (a mid-17th century geographer and a librarian at the Vatican Library) identified the sanctuary with the temple of the goddess Victory mentioned in the inscription, and he showed that the Romans associated the Sabine deity with their goddess Victoria. A confirmation of Holstenius' thesis came in 1757 with the discovery of the massa Mandelana inscription near Cantalupo (Mandela), which helped antiquarians to identify yet another place name mentioned by Horace as being near his Sabine estate. Description[edit] The Aniene Valley to the east of Rome is rich with archaeological remains. The Roman villa on the east slope of the Colle Rotondo (980 meters above sea level) in the Lucretili Mountains near the hilltown of Licenza is one of the best preserved and most significant sites. Attributed by most scholars since the 18th century to the Roman poet Horace, this villa dates from the first century B.C. and is located just 30 miles from the center of Rome in a valley near Vicovaro and Hadrian's Villa at Tivoli. The actual site was identified and a small portion was excavated in the 18th century. Major excavations were undertaken in the early 20th century. Thus far, the main residence of the estate has been identified, covering, in the imperial period, some 40 x 110 meters of built space and gardens. Black and white mosaics (formerly dated to Horace's lifespan, but now known to be from the Flavian dynasty), marble wall revetment and architectonic elements, an elaborate water system, and artistic and utilitarian remains have been found. A selection of the material is on display in the local museum in the town of Licenza. References[edit] ^ "Horace's Villa at Licenza". Archived from the original on 2 April 2018. External links[edit] Horace's Villa Project of the American Academy in Rome and the Soprintendenza Archeologica per il Lazio A two-part documentary about Horace's Villa Site of the Villa in Google Maps Authority control BNF: cb14535623q (data) GND: 4361917-4 LCCN: sh95005567 NLI: 000594565 SUDOC: 076495019 VcBA: 494/5161 VIAF: 240066424 WorldCat Identities: viaf-240066424 Coordinates: 42°03′58″N 12°54′04″E / 42.0661°N 12.9011°E / 42.0661; 12.9011 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Horace%27s_Villa&oldid=982124824" Categories: Roman villas in Italy Buildings and structures in Lazio Archaeological sites in Lazio Horace Hidden categories: Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLI identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Coordinates on Wikidata Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Deutsch Italiano Edit links This page was last edited on 6 October 2020, at 09:14 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2038 ---- Secessio plebis - Wikipedia Secessio plebis From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search This article is about secession in ancient Rome. For other uses of secession, see Secession (disambiguation). This article may be expanded with text translated from the corresponding article in Italian. (September 2018) Click [show] for important translation instructions. View a machine-translated version of the Italian article. Machine translation like DeepL or Google Translate is a useful starting point for translations, but translators must revise errors as necessary and confirm that the translation is accurate, rather than simply copy-pasting machine-translated text into the English Wikipedia. Do not translate text that appears unreliable or low-quality. If possible, verify the text with references provided in the foreign-language article. You must provide copyright attribution in the edit summary accompanying your translation by providing an interlanguage link to the source of your translation. A model attribution edit summary Content in this edit is translated from the existing Italian Wikipedia article at [[:it:Secessio_plebis]]; see its history for attribution. You should also add the template {{Translated|it|Secessio_plebis}} to the talk page. For more guidance, see Wikipedia:Translation. Secessio plebis (withdrawal of the commoners, or secession of the plebs) was an informal exercise of power by Rome's plebeian citizens, similar in concept to the general strike. During the secessio plebis, the plebs would abandon the city en masse in a protest emigration and leave the patrician order to themselves. Therefore, a secessio meant that all shops and workshops would shut down and commercial transactions would largely cease. This was an effective strategy in the Conflict of the Orders due to strength in numbers; plebeian citizens made up the vast majority of Rome's populace and produced most of its food and resources, while a patrician citizen was a member of the minority upper class, the equivalent of the landed gentry of later times. Authors report different numbers for how many secessions there were. Cary & Scullard state there were five between 494 BC and 287 BC.[1] Contents 1 Secessions in Roman history 1.1 First Secession – 494 BC 1.2 Second Secession – 449 BC 1.3 Third Secession – 445 BC 1.4 Fourth Secession – 342 BC 1.5 Fifth Secession – 287 BC 2 References 3 Bibliography 4 External links Secessions in Roman history[edit] First Secession – 494 BC[edit] Main article: First secessio plebis The Secession of the People to the Mons Sacer, engraving by B. Barloccini, 1849. Beginning in 495 BC, and culminating in 494–493 BC, the plebeian class of Rome grew increasingly unhappy with the political rulership of the patrician class. At this time, the Roman city-state was governed by two consuls and the senate, which performed executive and most of the legislative functions of Rome. Both of these governing bodies were composed of only patricians, who were generally a wealthy minority of the Roman populace. In 495 BC, the plebeian populace of Rome began to raise significant concerns about debt, including questioning the necessity of beatings and imprisonment of debtors by money-lenders. Roman historian Livy records an account of a former military official throwing himself into the forum in an extremely disheveled state, telling the people of his troubles. He explained that during the war against the Sabines his estate was torched by the enemy and his possessions stolen. Upon returning home, he was forced to take a loan to afford paying a tax that had been imposed on him, driving him deeply into debt due to usury. This resulted in him being forced to give up family properties including his grandfather and father's farms. When this was still insufficient, he was taken by his creditors to a prison, whipped, and threatened with death. The people at the forum were angered and the story quickly spread, drawing a large crowd into an uproar.[2] After much anticipation about consul or senate action to address popular debt concerns, consul Appius worsened the situation by passing unpopular decrees reinforcing the imprisonment of debtors by creditors.[3] This outrage further compounded by continued senate inaction resulted in the plebeians on the advice of Lucius Sicinius Vellutus seceding to the Mons Sacer (the Sacred Mountain), over three miles from the city. The plebeians then established basic defences in the area, waiting for senate action.[4] Map of Republican Rome by William R Shepherd, 1923. After the secession, the senate finally took action to address the issue. Negotiating with three envoys from the plebeians, the senate came to a resolution. The patricians freed some of the plebs from their debts and conceded some of their power by creating the office of the Tribune of the Plebs.[5] This office was the first government position to be held by the plebs, since at this time the office of consul was held by patricians solely. Plebeian Tribunes were made personally sacrosanct during their period in office, meaning that any person who harmed them was subject to punishment by death.[6][7] Second Secession – 449 BC[edit] The Second Secessio Plebis of 449 BC was precipitated by the abuses of a commission of the decemviri (Latin for "ten men") and involved demands for the restoration of the plebeian tribunes (the representatives of the plebeians) and of the right to appeal, which had been suspended. In 450 BC Rome decided to appoint the decemviri which was tasked with compiling a law code (which became the Law of the Twelve Tables). The commission was given a term of one year, during which the offices of state were suspended. The decemviri were also exempted from appeal. In 450 BC, they issued a set of laws, but did not resign at the end of their term and held onto their power instead. They killed a soldier, a former plebeian tribune, who had criticised them. One of the decemviri, Appius Claudius Crassus, tried to force a woman, Verginia, to marry him. To prevent this, her father stabbed her and cursed Appius Claudius Crassus. This sparked riots which started when the crowd witnessed the incident and spread to the army, encamped outside the city. The crowd went to the Aventine Hill. The senate pressured the decemviri to resign, but they refused. The people decided to withdraw to Mons Sacer, as they had during the first secession. The senate blamed the decemviri for the new secession and managed to force their full resignation. The body selected two senators, Lucius Valerus Potitus and Marcus Horatius Barbatus, to go meet with the people to negotiate. Those gathered at Mons Sacer demanded the restoration of both the plebeian tribunes and the right to appeal, as they had been suspended during the term of the decemviri. The senate's delegation of two agreed to these terms and they returned to the Aventine Hill and elected their tribunes. Lucius Valerius Potitus and Marcus Horatius Barbatus became the consuls for 449 BC. They introduced new laws which increased the power and added to the political strength of the plebeians. The lex Valeria Horatia de plebiscìtis stipulated that the laws passed by the Plebeian Council were binding of all Roman citizens (that is, both patricians and plebeians) despite the patrician opposition to the requirement that they adhere to the universal law. However, once passed, these laws had to receive the approval of the senate (auctoritas patrum). This meant that the senate had the power of veto over the laws passed by the plebeians. Lex Valeria Horatia de senatus consulta ordered that the senatus consulta (the decrees of the senate) had to be kept in the Temple of Ceres by the plebeian aediles (assistants of the plebeian tribunes). This meant that the plebeian tribunes and aediles had knowledge of these decrees, which previously was privileged knowledge. Thus, the decrees entered into the public domain. In the past, the consuls had been in the habit of suppressing or altering them.[8][9] The lex Valeria Horatia de provocatio forbade the creation of state offices that were not subject to appeal.[10] Third Secession – 445 BC[edit] Main article: Lex Canuleia As part of the process of establishing the Twelve Tables of Roman law, the second decemvirate placed severe restrictions on the plebeian order, including a prohibition on the intermarriage of patricians and plebeians.[11][12] Gaius Canuleius, one of the tribunes of the plebs in 445 BCE, proposed a rogatio repealing this law. The consuls vehemently opposed Canuleius, arguing that the tribune was proposing nothing less than the breakdown of Rome's social and moral fabric, at a time when the city was faced with external threats.[i] Undeterred, Canuleius reminded the people of the many contributions of Romans of lowly birth, and pointed out that the Senate had willingly given Roman citizenship to defeated enemies, even while maintaining that the marriage of patricians and plebeians would be detrimental to the state. He then proposed that, in addition to restoring the right of conubium, the law should be changed to allow plebeians to hold the consulship; all but one of the other tribunes supported this measure.[14] A remark by a consul, that the children of mixed marriages might incur the displeasure of the gods, inflamed the plebeians into a military strike, refusing to defend the city against attacking neighbors. This caused the consuls to yield to their demands, allowing a vote on Canuleius' original rogatio. The prohibition on intermarriage between patricians and plebeians was thus repealed.[15] However, the proposal that would permit plebeians to stand for the consulship was not brought to a vote. Threatening a radical escalation of the conflict between the plebeian assembly and the patrician senate.[16][17] A compromise was instead suggested that military tribunes with consular power might be elected from either order. This proposal was well-received, and the first consular tribunes were elected for the following year.[16][18] Fourth Secession – 342 BC[edit] This fourth secession is noted by Livy. The Oxford Classical Dictionary refers to this as an "obscure military revolt." Fifth Secession – 287 BC[edit] Main article: Lex Hortensia In 287 BC, the plebeians seceded for the fifth and final time. In 290 BC, Roman armies led by consuls Manio Curio Denato and Publio Cornelio Rufino Lands conquered large territories in the plains of Rieti and Amiternum from the Sabines.[19] After the war, lands were distributed solely to the Patricians. Meanwhile plebeian farmers, many of whom had fought in the war, found difficulty in repaying debts incurred with these wealthy patricians. This time plebeians seceded to Aventine Hill in protest. To resolve the matter, Quintus Hortensius was appointed as dictator, who convinced the crowd to stop the secession. Shortly afterwards Hortensius promulgated a law, the Lex Hortensia, which established that the laws decided on by plebeian assemblies (plebiscite) were made binding on all Roman citizens, including patricians.[6] This law finally eliminated the political disparity between the two classes, closing the Conflict of Orders after about two hundred years of struggle. This event, although far from resolving all the economic and social inequalities between patricians and plebeians, nevertheless marked an important turning point in the history of Roman democracy as it gave rise to the formation of a new type of patrician-plebeian nobility (nobilitas) which, allowing continuity in the government of the republic, constituted one of the main elements of strength in its economic and military expansion. References[edit] ^ Specifically, a revolt at Ardea, Veientes raiding Roman territory, and increased activity at a fortification of the Aequi and Volsci.[13] ^ Cary, M; Scullard, H.H. (1980). A History of Rome. p. 66. ISBN 0-333-27830-5. ^ Livy, 2.23 ^ Livy, 2.27 ^ Livy, 2.32 ^ Kondratieff, Eric (2018). "Tribuni plebis". Wiley Online Library. ^ a b "Secessio plebis". Imperium Romanum. ^ Livy, 2.33 ^ Livy, 3.55.13 ^ Cornell, p. 265 ^ Cornell, p. 277 ^ Livy, iv. 4. ^ Dionysius, x. 60. ^ Livy, iv. 1. ^ Livy, iv. 3–5. ^ Livy, iv. 6. ^ a b Livy, iv. 7. ^ Dionysius, xi. 60. ^ Dionysius, xi. 60, 61. ^ Florus , Epitome , Lib. I, X Bibliography[edit] Livy, "Ab urbe condita" Cornell, T.J., "The Beginnings of Rome", Routledge, 1995. 'The Growth of Plebeian Privilege in Rome', The English Historical Review No. II (April 1886) Forsythe, G., A Critical History of Early Rome", Berkeley, 2005 Florus, Epitome, Lib. I, X External links[edit] Quotations related to Secessio plebis at Wikiquote The dictionary definition of secession at Wiktionary v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Secessio_plebis&oldid=996324310" Categories: 494 BC Protest tactics Secession Ancient Roman society Hidden categories: Articles to be expanded from September 2018 All articles to be expanded Articles needing translation from Italian Wikipedia Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikiquote Languages Беларуская Български Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Ελληνικά Español Français 한국어 Hrvatski Italiano Latina Magyar Nederlands Norsk bokmål Português Русский Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски ไทย Edit links This page was last edited on 25 December 2020, at 22:23 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2044 ---- Gaius Asinius Pollio - Wikipedia Gaius Asinius Pollio From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia   (Redirected from Asinius Pollio) Jump to navigation Jump to search 1st-century BC and AD Roman politician, historian and writer For the 1st-century consul, see Gaius Asinius Pollio (consul 23). Gaius Asinius Pollio (75 BC – AD 4)[1] was a Roman soldier, politician, orator, poet, playwright, literary critic and historian, whose lost contemporary history provided much of the material used by the historians Appian and Plutarch. Pollio was most famously a patron of Virgil and a friend of Horace and had poems dedicated to him by both men.[2] Contents 1 Early life 2 Political career 3 Time in Hispania 4 Role in civil war 5 Later life 6 Personal life 7 Legacy 8 See also 9 References 10 Sources Early life[edit] Asinius Pollio was born in Teate Marrucinorum, the modern current Chieti in Abruzzi, central Italy. According to an inscription his father was called Gnaeus Asinius Pollio.[3] He had a brother called Asinius Marrucinus, whom Catullus calls out for his tasteless practical joke,[4] whose name suggests a family origin among the Marrucini. He may therefore have been the grandson of Herius Asinius, a plebeian and a general of the Marrucini who fought on the Italian side in the Social War.[5] Pollio moved in the literary circle of Catullus, and entered public life in 56 BC by supporting Lentulus Spinther. In 54 he unsuccessfully impeached Gaius Cato, a distant relative of the more famous Cato the Younger. Gaius Porcius Cato had acted as the tool of the triumvirs Pompey, Crassus and Caesar in his tribunate in 56. Political career[edit] Despite his initial support of Lentulus Spinther, in the civil war between Caesar and Pompey, Pollio sided with Caesar. He was present when Caesar deliberated whether to cross the Rubicon and begin the war.[6] After Pompey and the Senate fled to Greece, Caesar sent Pollio to Sicily to relieve Cato of his command.[7] He and Gaius Scribonius Curio were sent to Africa to fight the province's governor, the Pompeian Publius Attius Varus. Curio defeated Varus at Utica, despite his opponents' poisoning of the water supply. Curio marched to face Pompey's ally King Juba of Numidia, but was defeated and killed, along with all his men, on the Bagradas River. Pollio managed to retreat to Utica with a small force.[8] He was present as Caesar's legate at the Battle of Pharsalus in 48, and recorded Pompeian casualties at 6,000.[9] In 47 Pollio was probably tribune, and resisted the efforts of another tribune, Publius Cornelius Dolabella, to cancel all debts. The following year he returned to Africa, this time with Caesar himself, in pursuit of Cato and Metellus Scipio.[10] Time in Hispania[edit] When Caesar was assassinated in 44, Pollio was leading his forces in Hispania against Sextus Pompeius, and distinguishing himself early in the campaign.[11] He had accepted the commission reluctantly because of a personal enmity with another of Caesar's allies. Marcus Aemilius Lepidus was appointed the new governor of the province,[12] but Pollio, while remaining loyal to Caesar's supporters, held out against him, announcing at Corduba that he would not hand over his province to anyone who did not have a commission from the Senate.[13] A few months later his quaestor, Lucius Cornelius Balbus, absconded from Gades with the money intended to pay the soldiers, and fled to Mauretania.[14] Pollio was then so severely defeated by Pompeius that he had to escape the battlefield in disguise.[15] Role in civil war[edit] Pollio vacillated between Mark Antony and Octavian as civil war between them brewed,[16] but ultimately threw in his lot with Antony.[17] Antony, Lepidus, and Octavian soon joined forces in the Second Triumvirate. In their series of bloody proscriptions, Pollio's father-in-law, Lucius Quintius, was one of the first to be marked for murder. He fled by sea, but committed suicide by throwing himself overboard.[18] In the division of the provinces, Gaul fell to Antony, who entrusted Pollio with the administration of Gallia Transpadana (the part of Cisalpine Gaul between the Po and the Alps).[19] In superintending the distribution of the Mantuan territory amongst the veterans, he used his influence to save from confiscation the property of the poet Virgil. In 40 Pollio helped to arrange the peace of Brundisium by which Octavian and Antony were for a time reconciled. In the same year Pollio entered upon his consulship, which had been promised him in 43 by the Second Triumvirate. Virgil addressed the famous fourth eclogue to him, though there is uncertainty regarding whether Virgil composed the poem in anticipation of Pollio's consulship or to celebrate his part in the Treaty of Brundisium. Virgil, like other Romans, hoped that peace was at hand and looked forward to a Golden Age under Pollio's consulship. However, Pollio did not complete his consular year. He and his co-consul were removed from office by Antony and Octavian in the final months of the year. The following year Pollio conducted a successful campaign against the Parthini, an Illyrian people who adhered to Marcus Junius Brutus,[20] and celebrated a triumph on 25 October. Virgil's eighth eclogue was addressed to Pollio while he was engaged in this campaign. In 31 Octavian asked him to take part in the Battle of Actium against Antony, but Pollio, remembering the kindness that Antony had shown him, remained neutral.[21] Later life[edit] From the spoils of the war Pollio constructed the first public library at Rome, in the Atrium Libertatis, also erected by him,[22] which he adorned with statues of the most celebrated heroes. The library had Greek and Latin wings, and reportedly its establishment posthumously fulfilled one of Caesar's ambitions. There was a magnificent art collection attached to this library.[23] Pollio loved Hellenistic art at its most imaginative, even including the rather extravagant group known as the Farnese Bull. Like the library, the art gallery was open to the public. After his military and political successes, Pollio appears to have retired into private life as a patron of literary figures and a writer. He was known as a severe literary critic, fond of an archaic style and purity. In retirement, Pollio organized literary readings where he encouraged authors to read their own work, and he was the first Roman author to recite his own works. One of the most dramatic such readings brought the poet Virgil to the attention of the imperial family, when Virgil read from his work-in-progress the Aeneid, and flattered the imperial family by his portrayal of Aeneas, whom the Julii Caesares believed to be their direct patrilineal ancestor. As a result, Virgil was praised by Augustus himself.[24] Pollio may have died in his villa at Tusculum. He was apparently a staunch republican, and thus held himself somewhat aloof from Augustus. Personal life[edit] Married to Quinctia, daughter of Lucius Quinctius, who was executed in 43, Pollio is also notable as the father of Gaius Asinius Gallus Saloninus, the second husband of Vipsania Agrippina, daughter of Marcus Vipsanius Agrippa, Augustus's partner, second-in-command and second son-in-law. Gallus and Vipsania had several sons together, two of whom were full consuls and a third was consul suffectus. Legacy[edit] Pollio's contemporary history, though itself lost, provided much of the material for the historians Appian and Plutarch. As such, he significantly influenced posterity's perception of his time — a key moment in Roman history. According to the poet Horace (Odes 2.1.1–4), he dated the start of the Civil Wars to the consulship of Quintus Metellus Celer in 60 BC. Johan Rudolph Thorbecke, a Dutch statesman of the 19th century, wrote a thesis about Pollio at the University of Leiden. Pollio makes a cameo appearance in Robert Graves's novel I, Claudius, where he discusses the ethics of writing history with young Claudius and Titus Livius. See also[edit] Pollio References[edit] ^ Jerome (Chronicon 2020) says he died in AD 4 in the seventieth year of his life, which would place the year of his birth at 65 BC. ^ Virgil, Eclogues 4, 8; Horace, Carmina 2.1 ^ William Smith, Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology, 1870, Vol. 3 pp. 437–439 Archived 11 May 2006 at the Wayback Machine ^ Catullus, Carmina 12 ^ Livy, Periochae 73.9 ^ Plutarch, Caesar 32 ^ Appian, Civil Wars 2.40 ^ Appian, Civil Wars 2.45 ^ Appian, Civil Wars2.82 ^ Plutarch, Caesar 52 ^ Velleius Paterculus, Roman History 2.73 ^ Velleius Paterculus, Roman History 2.63 ^ Cicero, Letters to Friends 10.31 ^ Cicero, Letters to Friends 10.32 ^ Cassius Dio, Roman History 45.10 ^ Cicero, Letters to Friends 10.32, 10.33; Appian, Civil Wars 3.46 ^ Appian, Civil Wars 3.97 ^ Appian, Civil Wars 4.12, 27 ^ Velleius Paterculus, Roman History 2.76 ^ Cassius Dio, Roman History 48.41.7 ^ Velleius Paterculus, Roman History 2.86 ^ Pliny, Natural History 35.10 ^ Paul Zanker, "The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus" ^ Tony Perrotet, "The Ancient Roman Reading Craze", The Believer, September 2003 Sources[edit] Louis H. Feldman, "Asinius Pollio and Herod's Sons", The Classical Quarterly, New Series, Vol. 35, No. 1 (1985), pp. 240–243. Article reading online requires subscription to JSTOR. Miland Brown, Loot, Plunder, and a New Public Library. G. S. Bobinski, (1994). Library Philanthropy. In W.A Wiegand and D.G. Davis (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Library History. New York: Garland Publishing. Political offices Preceded by L. Antonius P. Servilius Vatia Isauricus Consul of Rome 40 BC (renounced) With: Gnaeus Domitius Calvinus Succeeded by L. Cornelius Balbus P. Canidius Crassus Authority control BIBSYS: 95004195 GND: 118646117 ICCU: IT\ICCU\SBLV\192050 ISNI: 0000 0001 1683 1237 LCCN: n82153080 NLA: 35373813 NLI: 001471851 NTA: 072823240 RERO: 02-A010020099 SUDOC: 079574939 Trove: 930148 VIAF: 408149294315180521782 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n82153080 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gaius_Asinius_Pollio&oldid=990456466" Categories: 75 BC births AD 4 deaths 1st-century BC historians 1st-century BC Roman poets 1st-century BC Romans 1st-century Romans Ancient Roman generals Asinii Correspondents of Cicero Italian librarians Last of the Romans Latin historians People from Chieti Roman Republican consuls Hidden categories: Webarchive template wayback links Use dmy dates from July 2020 Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ICCU identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLI identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with RERO identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with Trove identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikisource Languages العربية Български Català Čeština Deutsch Español فارسی Français Furlan Italiano עברית Latina Magyar Nederlands 日本語 Polski Português Русский Slovenčina Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Українська Edit links This page was last edited on 24 November 2020, at 15:58 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2057 ---- Londinium - Wikipedia Londinium From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Settlement established on the current site of the City of London around AD 47-50 For other uses, see Londinium (disambiguation). A general outline of Roman London in late antiquity, with the modern banks of the Thames.[1] Discovered roads drawn as double lines; conjectural roads, single lines. Londinium, also known as Roman London, was the capital of Roman Britain during most of the period of Roman rule. It was originally a settlement established on the current site of the City of London around AD 47–50.[2][3] It sat at a key crossing point over the River Thames which turned the city into a road nexus and major port, serving as a major commercial centre in Roman Britain until its abandonment during the 5th century. Following the foundation of the town in the mid-1st century, early Londinium occupied the relatively small area of 1.4 km2 (0.5 sq mi), roughly equivalent to the size of present-day Hyde Park. In the year 60 or 61, the rebellion of the Iceni under Boudica forced the Roman authorities to abandon the settlement, which was then razed. Following the defeat of Boudica by the Roman governor Gaius Suetonius Paulinus a military installation was established[4] and the city was rebuilt. It had probably largely recovered within about a decade. During the later decades of the 1st century, Londinium expanded rapidly, becoming Britannia's largest city, and it was provided with large public buildings such as a forum[5] and amphitheatre.[6] By the turn of the century, Londinium had grown to perhaps 30,000 or 60,000 people, almost certainly replacing Camulodunum (Colchester) as the provincial capital and by the mid-2nd century, Londinium was at its height. Its forum-basilica was one of the largest structures north of the Alps when the Emperor Hadrian visited Londinium in 122. Excavations have discovered evidence of a major fire that destroyed much of the city shortly thereafter, but the city was again rebuilt. By the second half of the 2nd century, Londinium appears to have shrunk in both size and population. Although Londinium remained important for the rest of the Roman period, no further expansion resulted. Londinium supported a smaller but stable settlement population as archaeologists have found that much of the city after this date was covered in dark earth—the by-product of urban household waste, manure, ceramic tile, and non-farm debris of settlement occupation, which accumulated relatively undisturbed for centuries. Sometime between 190 and 225, the Romans built a defensive wall around the landward side of the city. Along with Hadrian's Wall and the road network, this wall was one of the largest construction projects carried out in Roman Britain. The London Wall survived for another 1,600 years and broadly defined the perimeter of the old City of London. Part of a series on the History of London Roman London Anglo-Saxon London Norman and Medieval London Tudor London Stuart London 18th-century London 19th-century London London 1900–1939 London in World War II Modern London (from 1945) London in the 1960s See also Timeline  London portal v t e Contents 1 Name 2 Location 3 Status 4 History 4.1 Founding 4.2 Roads 4.3 Boudica 4.4 1st century 4.5 Port 4.6 2nd century 4.7 London Wall 4.8 3rd century 4.9 Carausian Revolt 4.10 4th century 4.11 5th century 5 Demographics 6 Excavation 7 Displays 8 See also 9 Notes 10 References 11 Further reading 12 External links Name[edit] Main article: Etymology of London The etymology of the name Londinium is unknown. Following Geoffrey of Monmouth's pseudohistorical History of the Kings of Britain,[7][8] it was long published as derived from an eponymous founder named Lud, son of Heli. There is no evidence such a figure ever existed. Instead, the Latin name was probably based on a native Brittonic placename reconstructed as *Londinion.[10] Morphologically, this points to a structure of two suffixes: -in-jo-. However, the Roman Londinium was not the immediate source of English "London" (Old English: Lunden), as i-mutation would have caused the name to have been Lyndon. This suggests an alternative Brittonic form Londonion;[13] alternatively, the local pronunciation in British Latin may have changed the pronunciation of Londinium to Lundeiniu or Lundein, which would also have avoided i-mutation in Old English.[14] The list of the 28 Cities of Britain included in the 9th-century History of the Britons precisely notes London[15] in Old Welsh as Cair Lundem[16] or Lundein.[15][18] Location[edit] A map of Roman Britain[19] The site guarded the Romans' bridgehead on the north bank of the Thames and a major road nexus shortly after the invasion. It was centred on Cornhill and the River Walbrook, but extended west to Ludgate Hill and east to Tower Hill. Just prior to the Roman conquest, the area had been contested by the Catuvellauni based to the west and the Trinovantes based to the east; it bordered the realm of the Cantiaci on the south bank of the Thames. The Roman city ultimately covered at least the area of the City of London, whose boundaries are largely defined by its former wall. Londinium's waterfront on the Thames ran from around Ludgate Hill in the west to the present site of the Tower in the east, around 1.5 kilometres (0.93 mi). The northern wall reached Bishopsgate and Cripplegate near the Museum of London, a course now marked by the street "London Wall". Cemeteries and suburbs existed outside the city proper. A round temple has been located west of the city, although its dedication remains unclear. Substantial suburbs existed at St Martin-in-the-Fields in Westminster and around the southern end of the Thames bridge in Southwark, where inscriptions suggest a temple of Isis was located.[20] Status[edit] Londinium grew up as a vicus and soon became an important port for trade between Britain and the Roman provinces on the continent. Tacitus wrote that, at the time of the uprising of Boudica, "Londinium... though undistinguished by the name of 'colony', was much frequented by a number of merchants and trading vessels."[22][23] Depending on the time of its creation, the modesty of Londonium's first forum may have reflected its early elevation to city (municipium) status or may have reflected an administrative concession to a low-ranking but major Romano-British settlement.[24] It had almost certainly been granted colony (colonia) status prior to the complete replanning of the city's street plan attending the erection of the great second forum around the year 120.[25] By this time, Britain's provincial administration had also almost certainly been moved to Londinium from Camulodunum (Colchester in Essex). The precise date of this change is unknown and no surviving source explicitly states that Londinium was "the capital of Britain" but there are several strong indications of this status: 2nd-century roofing tiles have been found marked by the "Procurator" or "Publican of the Province of Britain at Londinium",[27] the remains of a governor's palace and tombstones belonging to the governor's staff have been discovered, and the city was well defended and armed, with a new military camp erected at the beginning of the 2nd century in a fort on the north-western edge of the city, despite being far from any frontier.[28] Despite some corruption to the text, the list of bishops for the 314 Council of Arles indicates that either Restitutus or Adelphius came from Londinium.[31] The city seems to have been the seat of the diocesan vicar and one of the provincial governors following the Diocletian Reforms around the year 300; it had been renamed Augusta—a common epithet of provincial capitals—by 368.[32] History[edit] Founding[edit] See also: Roman conquest of Britain Unlike many cities of Roman Britain, Londinium was not placed on the site of a Celtic oppidum.[33] Prior to the arrival of the Roman legions, the area was almost certainly lightly rolling open countryside traversed by numerous streams now underground. Ptolemy lists it as one of the cities of the Cantiacs,[34] but Durovernum (Roman Canterbury) was their tribal capital (civitas). It is possible that the town was preceded by a short-lived Roman military camp but the evidence is limited and this topic remains a matter of debate.[35][36] Archaeologist Lacey Wallace notes that "Because no LPRIA settlements or significant domestic refuse have been found in London, despite extensive archaeological excavation, arguments for a purely Roman foundation of London are now common and uncontroversial."[37] The city's Latin name seems to have derived from an originally Brittonic one and significant pre-Roman finds in the Thames, especially the Battersea Shield (Chelsea Bridge, perhaps 4th-century BC) and the Wandsworth Shield (perhaps 1st-century BC), both assumed to be votive offerings deposited a couple of miles upstream of Londinium, suggest the general area was busy and significant. It has been suggested that the area was where a number of territories met.[38] There was probably a ford in that part of the river; other Roman and Celtic finds suggest this was perhaps where the opposed crossing Julius Caesar describes in 54 BC took place. Londinium grew up around the point on the River Thames narrow enough for the construction of a Roman bridge but still deep enough to handle the era's seagoing ships.[39] Its placement on the Tideway permitted easier access for ships sailing upstream.[39][40] The remains of a massive pier base for such a bridge were found in 1981 close by the modern London Bridge. Some Claudian-era camp ditches have been discovered,[41] but archaeological excavations undertaken since the 1970s by the Department of Urban Archaeology at the Museum of London (now MOLAS) have suggested the early settlement was largely the product of private enterprise.[42] A timber drain by the side of the main Roman road excavated at No 1 Poultry has been dated by dendrochronology to AD 47, which is likely to be the foundation date.[43] Following its foundation in the mid-1st century, early Roman London occupied a relatively small area, about 350 acres (1.4 km2) or roughly the area of present-day Hyde Park. Archaeologists have uncovered numerous goods imported from across the Roman Empire in this period, suggesting that early Roman London was a highly cosmopolitan community of merchants from across the Empire and that local markets existed for such objects. Roads[edit] Main article: Roman roads in Britain A map of the known Roman road network, highlighting the routes included in the Antonine Itinerary Of the fifteen British routes recorded in the 2nd- or 3rd-century Antonine Itinerary, seven ran to or from Londinium.[32][45] Most of these have been shown to have been initially constructed near the time of the city's foundation around AD 47.[46] The roads are now known by Welsh or Old English names, as their original Roman names have been entirely lost due to the lack of written and inscribed sources. (It was customary elsewhere to name roads after the emperor during whose principate they were completed, but the number and vicinity of routes completed during the time of Claudius would seem to have made this impractical in Britain's case.) The road from the Kentish ports of Rutupiae (Richborough), Dubris (Dover), and Lemanis (Lympne) via Durovernum (Canterbury) seems to have first crossed the Thames at a natural ford near Westminster before being diverted north to the new bridge at London.[53] The Romans enabled the road to cross the marshy terrain without subsidence by laying down substrates of one to three layers of oak logs.[46][52] This route, now known as Watling Street, then passed through the town from the bridgehead in a straight line to reconnect with its northern extension towards Viroconium (Wroxeter) and the legionary base at Deva Victrix (Chester). The Great Road ran northeast across Old Ford to Camulodunum (Colchester) and thence northeast along Pye Road to Venta Icenorum (Caistor St Edmund). Ermine Street ran north from the city to Lindum (Lincoln) and Eboracum (York). The Devil's Highway connected Londinium to Calleva (Silchester) and its roads to points west over the bridges near modern Staines. A minor road led southwest to the city's main cemetery and the old routes to the ford at Westminster. Stane Street to Noviomagus (Chichester) did not reach Londinium proper but ran from the bridgehead in the southern suburb at Southwark. These roads varied from 12–20 m (39–66 ft) wide.[46] After its reconstruction in the AD 60s, the streets largely adhered to a grid. The main streets were 9–10 m (30–33 ft) wide, while side streets were usually about 5 m (16 ft) wide.[46] Boudica[edit] Main article: Boudica's Revolt The rediscovery of Tacitus's works revived English interest in Boudica, particularly during the 19th century, when she was used as a symbol for Queen Victoria and the British Empire. (Boadicea and Her Daughters by Thomas Thornycroft, 1860s, cast by his son in 1902.) In the year 60 or 61, a little more than ten years after Londinium was founded, the king of the Iceni died. He had possibly been installed by the Romans after the Iceni's failed revolt against P. Ostorius Scapula's disarmament of the allied tribes in AD 47[54] or may have assisted the Romans against his tribesmen during that revolt. His will had divided his wealth and lands between Rome and his two daughters, but Roman law forbade female inheritance and it had become common practice to treat allied kingdoms as life estates that were annexed upon the ruler's death, as had occurred in Bithynia[55] and Galatia.[56] Roman financiers including Seneca called in all the king's outstanding loans at once[57] and the provincial procurator confiscated the property of both the king and his nobles. Tacitus records that, when the king's wife Boudica objected, the Romans flogged her, raped her two daughters, and enslaved their nobles and kinsmen.[58] Boudica then led a failed revolt against Roman rule. Two hundred ill-equipped men were sent to defend the provincial capital and Roman colony at Camulodunum, probably from the garrison at Londinium.[59] The Iceni and their allies overwhelmed them and razed the city. The 9th Legion under Q. Petillius Cerialis, coming south from the Fosse Way, was ambushed and annihilated. The procurator, meanwhile, escaped with his treasure to Gaul, probably via Londinium.[59] G. Suetonius Paulinus had been leading the 14th and 20th Legions in the invasion of Anglesey now known as the Menai massacre; hearing of the rising, he immediately returned along Watling Street with the legions' cavalry.[59] An early historical record of London appears in Tacitus's account of his actions upon arriving and finding the state of the 9th Legion:[21][23] At first, [Paulinus] hesitated as to whether to stand and fight there. Eventually, his numerical inferiority—and the price only too clearly paid by the divisional commander's rashness—decided him to sacrifice the single city of Londinium to save the province as a whole. Unmoved by lamentations and appeals, Suetonius gave the signal for departure. The inhabitants were allowed to accompany him. But those who stayed because they were women, or old, or attached to the place, were slaughtered by the enemy. Excavation has revealed extensive evidence of destruction by fire in the form of a layer of red ash beneath the city at this date. Suetonius then returned to the legions' slower infantry, who met and defeated the British army, slaughtering as many as 70,000 men and camp followers. There is a long-standing folklore belief that this battle took place at King’s Cross, simply because as a mediaeval village it was known as Battle Bridge. Suetonius's flight back to his men, the razing of Verulamium (St Albans), and the battle shortly thereafter at "a place with narrow jaws, backed by a forest",[21][23] speaks against the tradition and no supporting archaeological evidence has been yet discovered.[60] 1st century[edit] A model of London in 85–90 on display in the Museum of London, depicting the first bridge over the Thames After being sacked, the city was rebuilt as a planned Roman town, its streets generally adhering to a grid skewed by major roads passing from the bridgehead and by changes in alignment produced by crossings over the local streams.[61] It recovered after about a decade.[citation needed] A fortified enclosure was erected at Plantation Place on Cornhill. The first forum was constructed in the 70s or 80s[24] and has been excavated, showing it had an open courtyard with a basilica and several shops around it, altogether measuring about 100 m × 50 m (330 ft × 160 ft).[62] The basilica would have functioned as the city's administrative heart, hearing law cases and seating the town's local senate. It formed the north side of the forum, whose south entrance was located along the north side of the intersection of the present Gracechurch, Lombard, and Fenchurch Streets.[63] Forums elsewhere typically had a civic temple constructed within the enclosed market area; British sites usually did not, instead placing a smaller shrine for Roman services somewhere within the basilica. The first forum in Londinium seems to have had a full temple, but placed outside just west of the forum.[64] During the later decades of the 1st century, Londinium expanded rapidly and quickly became Roman Britain's largest city, although most of its houses continued to be made of wood. By the turn of the century, Londinium was perhaps as large as 60,000 people,[65][66] and had replaced Camulodunum (Colchester) as the provincial capital. A large building discovered near Cannon Street Station has had its foundation dated to this era and is assumed to have been the governor's palace. It boasted a garden, pools, and several large halls, some of which were decorated with mosaic floors.[67] It stood on the east bank of the now-covered Walbrook, near where it joins the Thames. London Stone may originally have been part of the palace's main entrance. Another site dating to this era is the bathhouse (thermae) at Huggin Hill, which remained in use prior to its demolition around the year 200. Brothels were legal but taxed.[68] Port[edit] A diagram of the Roman structures from the port of Londinium (c. AD 100) excavated along the bank of the Thames. The bulk of the Roman port was quickly rebuilt after Boudicca's rebellion[69] when the waterfront was extended with gravel to permit a sturdy wharf to be built perpendicular to the shore. The port was built in four sections, starting upstream of the London Bridge and working down towards the Walbrook at the centre of Londinium. Expansion of the flourishing port continued into the 3rd century. Scraps of armour, leather straps, and military stamps on building timbers suggest that the site was constructed by the city's legionaries.[70] Major imports included fine pottery, jewellery and wine.[71] Only two large warehouses are known, implying that Londinium functioned as a bustling trade centre rather than a supply depot and distribution centre like Ostia near Rome.[70] 2nd century[edit] A bronze head of Hadrian found in London (British Museum) Emperor Hadrian visited in 122. The impressive public buildings from around this period may have been initially constructed in preparation for his visit or during the rebuilding that followed the "Hadrianic Fire". The so-called 'Hadrianic Fire' is not mentioned in any historical sources but has been inferred by evidence of large-scale burning identified by archaeologists on a number of excavation sites around the City of London.[72] The best dating evidence for this event(s) comes from burnt stocks of unsold Terra Sigilatta pottery, which can be dated to circa AD 120-125. These were found in destroyed warehouse or shop buildings at Regis House and Bucklersbury.[73] Hadrianic fire horizons tend to be dated to around the AD 120-130s but it is difficult to prove that they are precisely contemporary and there remains some uncertainty as to whether they indicate a single large fire or a series of smaller conflagrations.[72] Fire destroyed substantial areas of the city in the area north of the Thames but does not seem to have damaged many major public buildings. There is very little evidence to suggest similar burning in the adjacent Southwark settlement. The Hadrianic fire (or fires) has normally been assumed to be accidental[72] but it has also been suggested that it could relate to an episode of political turbulence.[74] A model of the expanded forum at the Museum of London Stela mentioning the Londiniensi ('Londoners') Reconstruction drawing of Londinium c. 120 AD During the early 2nd century, Londinium was at its height, having recovered from the fire and again had between 45,000 and 60,000 inhabitants around the year 140, with many more stone houses and public buildings erected. Some areas were tightly packed with townhouses (domus). The town had piped water[75] and a "fairly-sophisticated" drainage system.[76] The governor's palace was rebuilt[67] and an expanded forum was built around the earlier one over a period of 30 years from around 90 to 120 into an almost perfect square measuring 168 m × 167 m (551 ft × 548 ft).[62] Its three-storey basilica was probably visible across the city and was the largest in the empire north of the Alps;[62][77] the marketplace itself rivaled those in Rome and was the largest in the north before Augusta Treverorum (Trier, Germany) became an imperial capital.[78] The city's temple of Jupiter was renovated,[79] public and private bathhouses were erected, and a fort (arx) was erected around the year 120 that maintained the city garrison northwest of town.[80] The fort was square (with rounded corners) measuring more than 200 m × 200 m (660 ft × 660 ft) and covering more than 12 acres (4.9 ha). Each side had a central gatehouse and stone towers were erected at the corners and at points along each wall.[80] Londinium's amphitheatre, constructed in AD 70, is situated at Guildhall.[81] When the Romans left in the 4th century the amphitheatre lay derelict for hundreds of years. In the 11th century the area was reoccupied and by the 12th century the first Guildhall was built next to it. A large port complex on both banks near London Bridge was discovered during the 1980s. A temple complex with two Romano-British temples was excavated at Empire Square, Long Lane, Southwark in 2002/2003. A large house there may have been a guesthouse. A marble slab with a dedication to the god Mars was discovered in the temple complex. The inscription mentions the Londoners, the earliest known reference naming the people of London.[82] A Roman mosaic floor from Londinium (British Museum) By the second half of the 2nd century, Londinium had many large, well-equipped stone buildings, some of which were richly adorned with wall paintings and floor mosaics, and had subfloor hypocausts. The Roman house at Billingsgate was built next to the waterfront and had its own bath.[83] In addition to such structures reducing the city's building density, however, Londinium also seems to have shrunk in both size and population in the second half of the 2nd century. The cause is uncertain but plague is considered likely, as the Antonine Plague is recorded decimating other areas of Western Europe between 165 and 190. The end of imperial expansion in Britain after Hadrian's decision to build his wall may have also damaged the city's economy. Although Londinium remained important for the rest of the Roman period, no further expansion occurred. Londinium remained well populated, as archaeologists have found that much of the city after this date was covered in dark earth which accumulated relatively undisturbed over centuries. London Wall[edit] Main article: London Wall A surviving fragment of the London Wall behind Tower Hill Station (2005) Some time between 190 and 225, the Romans built the London Wall, a defensive ragstone wall around the landward side of the city. Along with Hadrian's Wall and the road network, the London Wall was one of the largest construction projects carried out in Roman Britain. The wall was originally about 5 km (3 mi) long, 6 m (20 ft) high, and 2.5 m (8 ft 2 in) thick.[citation needed] Its dry moat (fossa) was about 2 m (6 ft 7 in) deep and 3–5 m (9.8–16.4 ft) wide.[84] In the 19th century, Smith estimated its length from the Tower west to Ludgate at about one mile (1.6 km) and its breadth from the northern wall to the bank of the Thames at around half that.[citation needed] In addition to small pedestrian postern gates like the one by Tower Hill, it had four main gates: Bishopsgate and Aldgate in the northeast at the roads to Eboracum (York) and to Camulodunum (Colchester) and Newgate and Ludgate in the west along at the road that divided for travel to Viroconium (Wroxeter) and to Calleva (Silchester) and at another road that ran along the Thames to the city's main cemetery and the old ford at Westminster. The wall partially utilized the army's existing fort, strengthening its outer wall with a second course of stone to match the rest of the course.[80][85] The fort had two gates of its own—Cripplegate to the north and another to the west—but these were not along major roads.[85] Aldersgate was eventually added, perhaps to replace the west gate of the fort. (The names of all these gates are medieval, as they continued to be occasionally refurbished and replaced until their demolition in the 17th and 18th centuries to permit widening the roads.)[85][86] The wall initially left the riverbank undefended: this was corrected in the 3rd century. Although the exact reason for the wall's construction is unknown, some historians have connected it with the Pictish invasion of the 180s.[87] Others link it with Clodius Albinus, the British governor who attempted to usurp Septimius Severus in the 190s. The wall survived another 1,600 years and still roughly defines the City of London's perimeter. 3rd century[edit] Ulpius Silvanus's Tauroctony depicting Mithras killing the bull, discovered in the ruins of the London Mithraeum. Septimius Severus defeated Albinus in 197 and shortly afterwards divided the province of Britain into Upper and Lower halves, with the former controlled by a new governor in Eboracum (York). Despite the smaller administrative area, the economic stimulus provided by the Wall and by Septimius Severus's campaigns in Caledonia somewhat revived London's fortunes in the early 3rd century. The northwest fort was abandoned and dismantled[80] but archaeological evidence points to renewed construction activity from this period. The London Mithraeum rediscovered in 1954 dates from around 240,[88] when it was erected on the east bank at the head of navigation on the now-covered River Walbrook about 200 m (660 ft) from the Thames.[89] From about 255 onwards, raiding by Saxon pirates led to the construction of a riverside wall as well. It ran roughly along the course of present-day Thames Street, which then roughly formed the shoreline. Large collapsed sections of this wall were excavated at Blackfriars and the Tower in the 1970s.[90] Carausian Revolt[edit] Main article: Carausian Revolt A Carausian coin from his mint at Londinium. The "Trier medallion" showing a woman kneeling in front of a Roman soldier at the city walls, thanking him for bringing Allectus's rule to an end In 286, the emperor Maximian issued a death sentence against Carausius, admiral of the Roman navy's Britannic fleet (Classis Britannica), on charges of having abetted Frankish and Saxon piracy and of having embezzled recovered treasure. Carausius responded by consolidating his allies and territory and revolting. After fending off Maximian's first assault in 288, he declared a new Britannic Empire and issued coins to that effect. Constantius Chlorus's sack of his Gallic base at Gesoriacum (Boulogne), however, led his treasurer Allectus to assassinate and replace him. In 296, Chlorus mounted an invasion of Britain that prompted Allectus's Frankish mercenaries to sack Londinium. They were only stopped by the arrival of a flotilla of Roman warships on the Thames, which slaughtered the survivors.[91] The event was commemorated by the golden "Trier Medallion", Chlorus on one side and, on the other, a woman kneeling at the city wall welcoming a mounted Roman soldier.[92] Another memorial to the return of Londinium to Roman control was the construction of a new set of forum baths around the year 300. The structures were modest enough that they were previously identified as parts of the forum and market but are now recognized as elaborate and luxurious baths including a frigidarium with two southern pools and an eastern swimming pool. 4th century[edit] See also: Celtic Christianity and Bishops of Londinium Following the revolt, the Diocletian Reforms saw the British administration restructured. Londinium is universally supposed to have been the capital of one of them, but it remains unclear where the new provinces were, whether there were initially three or four in total, and whether Valentia represented a fifth province or a renaming of an older one. In the 12th century, Gerald of Wales listed "Londonia" as the capital of Flavia, having had Britannia Prima (Wales) and Secunda (Kent) severed from the territory of Upper Britain.[93][94] Modern scholars more often list Londinium as the capital of Maxima Caesariensis on the assumption that the presence of the diocesan vicar in London would have required its provincial governor to outrank the others. The governor's palace[67] and old large forum seem to have fallen out of use around 300,[77] but in general the first half of the 4th century appears to have been a prosperous time for Britain, for the villa estates surrounding London appear to have flourished during this period. The London Mithraeum was rededicated, probably to Bacchus. A list of the 16 "archbishops" of London was recorded by Jocelyne of Furness in the 12th century, claiming the city's Christian community was founded in the 2nd century under the legendary King Lucius and his missionary saints Fagan, Deruvian, Elvanus, and Medwin. None of that is considered credible by modern historians but, although the surviving text is problematic, either Bishop Restitutus or Adelphius at the 314 Council of Arles seems to have come from Londinium.[31] The location of Londinium's original cathedral is uncertain. The present structure of St Peter upon Cornhill was designed by Christopher Wren following the Great Fire in 1666 but it stands upon the highest point in the area of old Londinium and medieval legends tied it to the city's earliest Christian community. In 1995, however, a large and ornate 4th-century building on Tower Hill was discovered: built sometime between 350 and 400, it seems to have mimicked St Ambrose's cathedral in the imperial capital at Milan on a still-larger scale.[95] It was about 100 m (330 ft) long by about 50 m (160 ft) wide.[96] Excavations by David Sankey of MOLAS established it was constructed out of stone taken from other buildings, including a veneer of black marble.[95][97] It was probably dedicated to St Paul.[96] From 340 onwards, northern Britain was repeatedly attacked by Picts and Gaels. In 360, a large-scale attack forced the emperor Julian the Apostate to send troops to deal with the problem. Large efforts were made to improve Londinium's defenses around the same time. At least 22 semi-circular towers were added to the city walls to provide platforms for ballistae[85] and the present state of the river wall suggested hurried repair work around this time.[90] In 367, the Great Conspiracy saw a coordinated invasion of Picts, Gaels, and Saxons joined with a mutiny of troops along the Wall. Count Theodosius dealt with the problem over the next few years, using Londinium—then known as "Augusta"—as his base.[98] It may have been at this point that one of the existing provinces was renamed Valentia, although the account of Theodosius's actions describes it as a province recovered from the enemy. In 382, Magnus Maximus organized all of the British-based troops and attempted to establish himself as emperor over the west. The event was obviously important to the Britons, as "Macsen Wledig" would remain a major figure in Welsh folklore and several medieval Welsh dynasties claimed descent from him. He was probably responsible for London's new church in the 370s or 380s.[95][96] He was initially successful but was defeated by Theodosius I at the 388 Battle of the Save. A new stretch of the river wall near Tower Hill seems to have been built further from the shore at some point over the next decade.[90] 5th century[edit] See also: Sub-Roman Britain, Anglo-Saxon settlement of Britain, Lundenwic, and Lundenburh Roman Britain around AD 410, without speculative provincial borders. With few troops left in Britain, many Romano-British towns—including Londinium—declined drastically over the next few decades. Many of London's public buildings had fallen into disrepair by this point,[citation needed] and excavations of the port show signs of rapid disuse.[69] Between 407 and 409, large numbers of barbarians overran Gaul and Hispania, seriously weakening communication between Rome and Britain. Trade broke down. Officials went unpaid and Romano-British troops elected their own leaders. Constantine III declared himself emperor over the west and crossed the Channel, an act considered the Roman withdrawal from Britain since the emperor Honorius subsequently directed the Britons to look to their own defence rather than send another garrison force.[99] Surviving accounts are scanty and mixed with Welsh and Saxon legends concerning Vortigern, Hengest, Horsa, and Ambrosius Aurelianus. Even archaeological evidence of Londinium during this period is minimal. Despite remaining on the list of Roman provinces, Romano-Britain seems to have dropped their remaining loyalties to Rome. Raiding by the Irish, Picts, and Saxons continued but Gildas records a time of luxury and plenty[102] which is sometimes attributed to reduced taxation. Archaeologists have found evidence that a small number of wealthy families continued to maintain a Roman lifestyle until the middle of the 5th century, inhabiting villas in the southeastern corner of the city and importing luxuries.[99] Medieval accounts state that the invasions that established Anglo-Saxon England (the Adventus Saxonum) did not begin in earnest until some time in the 440s and 450s.[108] Bede recorded that the Britons fled to Londinium in terror after their defeat at the Battle of Crecganford (probably Crayford),[105][106] but nothing further is said. By the end of the 5th century, the city was largely an uninhabited ruin,[99] its large church on Tower Hill burnt to the ground.[95] Over the next century, Angles, Saxons, Jutes, and Frisians arrived and established tribal areas and kingdoms. The area of the Roman city was administered as part of the Kingdom of the East Saxons – Essex, although the Saxon settlement of Lundenwic was not within the Roman walls but to the west in Aldwych. It was not until the Viking invasions of England that King Alfred the Great moved the settlement back within the safety of the Roman walls, which gave it the name Lundenburh. The foundations of the river wall, however, were undermined over time and had completely collapsed by the 11th century.[90] Memory of the earlier settlement survived: it is generally identified as the Cair Lundem[16] counted among the 28 cities of Britain included in the History of the Britons traditionally attributed to Nennius.[15][17] Demographics[edit] The population of Londinium is estimated to have peaked around 100 AD when it was still the capital of Britannia; at this point estimates for the population vary between about 30,000,[109] or about 60,000 people.[66] But there seems to have been a large decline after about 150 AD, possibly as the regional economic centres developed, and Londinium as the main port for imported goods became less significant. The Antonine Plague which swept the Empire from 165 to 180 may have had a big effect. Pottery workshops outside the city in Brockley Hill and Highgate appear to have ended production around 160, and the population may have fallen by as much as two thirds.[110] Londinium was an ethnically diverse city with inhabitants from across the Roman Empire, including those with backgrounds from Britannia, continental Europe, the Middle East, and North Africa.[111] A 2017 genetic test of human remains in Roman cemeteries states that the "presence of people born in London with African ancestry is not an unusual or atypical result for Londinium."[112] A 2016 study of the isotope analysis of 20 bodies from various periods suggested that at least 12 had grown up locally, with four being immigrants, and the last four unclear.[113] Excavation[edit] See also: Museum of London and Museum of London Archaeology See also: Amphitheatre (London) A Romano-Celtic temple being excavated at 56 Gresham Street. Many ruins remain buried beneath London, although understanding them can be difficult. Owing to London's own geology, which consists of a Taplow Terrace deep bed of brickearth, sand, and gravel over clay,[114] Roman gravel roads can only be identified as such if they were repeatedly relayered or if the spans of gravel can be traced across several sites. The minimal remains from wooden structures are easy to miss and stone buildings may leave foundations, but—as with the great forum—they were often dismantled for stone during the Middle Ages and early modern period.[25] The known floorplan of the presumed "governor's palace". The Roman wall at St Alphege Gardens The first extensive archaeological review of the Roman city of London was done in the 17th century after the Great Fire of 1666. Christopher Wren's renovation of St Paul's on Ludgate Hill found no evidence supporting Camden's contention[115] that it had been built over a Roman temple to the goddess Diana.[116] The extensive rebuilding of London in the 19th century and following the German bombing campaign during World War II also allowed for large parts of old London to be recorded and preserved while modern updates were made.[118] The construction of the London Coal Exchange led to the discovery of the Roman house at Billingsgate in 1848. In the 1860s, excavations by General Rivers uncovered a large number of human skulls and almost no other bones in the bed of the Walbrook.[119] The discovery recalls a passage in Geoffrey of Monmouth's pseudohistorical History of the Kings of Britain where Asclepiodotus besieged the last remnants of the usurper Allectus's army at "Londonia". Having battered the town's walls with siegeworks constructed by allied Britons, Asclepiodotus accepted the commander's surrender only to have the Venedotians rush upon them, ritually decapitating them and throwing the heads into the river "Gallemborne".[120][121] Asclepiodotus's siege was an actual event that occurred in AD 296, but further skull finds beneath the 3rd-century wall place at least some of the slaughter before its construction, leading most modern scholars to attribute them to Boudica's forces.[122][123] In 1947, the city's northwest fortress of the city garrison was discovered.[124] In 1954, excavations of what was thought to have been an early church instead revealed the London Mithraeum, which was relocated to permit building over its original site. (The building erected at the time has since been demolished, and plans to return the temple to its former location are under way.) Archaeologists began the first intensive excavation of the waterfront sites of Roman London in the 1970s. What was not found during this time has been built over making it very difficult to study or discover anything new.[9] Another phase of archaeological work followed the deregulation of the London Stock Exchange in 1986, which led to extensive new construction in the City's financial district. From 1991, many excavations were undertaken by the Museum of London's Archaeology Service, although it was spun off into the separately-run MOLA in 2011 following legislation to address the Rose Theatre fiasco. Displays[edit] A reconstructed Roman kitchen (culina) at the Museum of London (2014) Major finds from Roman London, including mosaics, wall fragments, and old buildings were formerly housed in the London and Guildhall Museums.[71] These merged after 1965[125] into the present Museum of London near the Barbican Centre. Museum of London Docklands, a separate branch dealing with the history of London's ports, opened on the Isle of Dogs in 2003. Other finds from Roman London continue to be held by the British Museum.[71] Much of the surviving wall is medieval, but Roman-era stretches are visible near Tower Hill Station, in a hotel courtyard at 8–10 Coopers Row, and in St Alphege Gardens off Wood Street.[85] A section of the river wall is visible inside the Tower.[90] Parts of the amphitheatre are on display at the Guildhall Art Gallery.[81] The southwestern tower of the Roman fort northwest of town can still be seen at Noble Street.[80] Occasionally, Roman sites are incorporated into the foundations of new buildings for future study, but these are not generally available to the public.[62][83] See also[edit] Ancient Rome portal Anglo-Saxon London Elizabethan London Notes[edit] ^ Note that this image includes both the garrison fort, which was demolished in the 3rd century, and the Mithraeum, which was abandoned around the same time. The identification of the "governor's palace" remains conjectural. ^ Hingley, Richard. Londinium : a biography : Roman London from its origins to the fifth century. London. pp. 27–32. ISBN 978-1-350-04730-3. OCLC 1042078915. ^ Hill, Julian. and Rowsome, Peter (2011). Roman London and the Walbrook stream crossing : excavations at 1 Poultry and vicinity, City of London. Rowsome, Peter., Museum of London Archaeology. London: Museum of London Archaeology. pp. 251–62. ISBN 978-1-907586-04-0. OCLC 778916833.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) ^ Dunwoodie, Lesley. (2015). An early Roman fort and urban development on Londinium's eastern hill : excavations at Plantation Place, City of London, 1997-2003. Harward, Chiz., Pitt, Ken. London: MOLA (Museum of London Archaeology). ISBN 978-1-907586-32-3. OCLC 920542650. ^ Marsden, Peter Richard Valentine. (1987). The Roman Forum Site in London : discoveries before 1985. Museum of London. London: H.M.S.O. ISBN 0-11-290442-4. OCLC 16415134. ^ Bateman, Nick. (2008). London's Roman amphitheatre : Guildhall Yard, City of London. Cowan, Carrie., Wroe-Brown, Robin., Museum of London. Archaeology Service. [London]: Museum of London Archaeology Service. ISBN 978-1-901992-71-7. OCLC 276334521. ^ Galfredus Monemutensis [Geoffrey of Monmouth]. Historia Regnum Britanniae [History of the Kings of Britain], Vol. III, Ch. xx. c. 1136. (in Latin) ^ Geoffrey of Monmouth. Translated by J.A. Giles & al. as Geoffrey of Monmouth's British History, Vol. III, Ch. XX, in Six Old English Chronicles of Which Two Are Now First Translated from the Monkish Latin Originals: Ethelwerd's Chronicle, Asser's Life of Alfred, Geoffrey of Monmouth's British History, Gildas, Nennius, and Richard of Cirencester. Henry G. Bohn (London), 1848. Hosted at Wikisource. ^ a b Haverfield, p. 145 ^ This etymology was first suggested in 1899 by d'Arbois de Jubainville and is generally accepted, as by Haverfield.[9] ^ Jackson, Kenneth H. (1938). "Nennius and the 28 cities of Britain". Antiquity. 12 (45): 44–55. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00013405. ^ Coates, Richard (1998). "A new explanation of the name of London". Transactions of the Philological Society. 96 (2): 203–29. doi:10.1111/1467-968X.00027. ^ This is the argument made by Jackson[11] and accepted by Coates.[12] ^ Peter Schrijver, Language Contact and the Origins of the Germanic Languages (2013), p. 57. ^ a b c Ford, David Nash. "The 28 Cities of Britain Archived 15 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine" at Britannia. 2000. ^ a b Nennius (attrib.). Theodor Mommsen (ed.). Historia Brittonum, VI. Composed after AD 830. (in Latin) Hosted at Latin Wikisource. ^ a b Newman, John Henry & al. Lives of the English Saints: St. German, Bishop of Auxerre, Ch. X: "Britain in 429, A. D.", p. 92. Archived 21 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine James Toovey (London), 1844. ^ Bishop Ussher, cited in Newman[17] ^ Encyclopædia Britannica, 11th edition. 1911. ^ White, Kevan (7 February 2016). "LONDINIVM AVGVSTA". roman-britain.co.uk. Archived from the original on 13 February 2018. Retrieved 1 February 2018. ^ a b c Tacitus. Ab Excessu Divi Augusti Historiarum Libri [Books of History from the Death of the Divine Augustus], Vol. XIV, Ch. XXXIII. c. AD 105. Hosted at Latin Wikisource. (in Latin) ^ Latin: Londinium..., cognomento quidem coloniae non insigne, sed copia negotiatorum et commeatuum maxime celebre.[21] ^ a b c Tacitus. Translated by Alfred John Church & William Jackson Brodribb. Annals of Tacitus, Translated into English, with Notes and Maps, Book XIV, § 33. Macmillan & Co. (London, 1876. Reprinted by Random House, 1942. Reprinted by the Perseus Project, c. 2011. Hosted at Wikisource. ^ a b Merrifield, pp. 64–66. ^ a b Merrifield, p. 68. ^ Egbert, James. Introduction to the Study of Latin Inscriptions, p. 447. American Book Co. (Cincinnati),1896. ^ Latin: P·P·BR·LON [Publicani Provinciae Britanniae Londinienses] & P·PR·LON [Publicani Provinciae Londinienses][26] ^ Wacher, p. 85. ^ Labbé, Philippe & Gabriel Cossart (eds.) Sacrosancta Concilia ad Regiam Editionem Exacta: quae Nunc Quarta Parte Prodit Actior [The Sancrosanct Councils Exacted for the Royal Edition: which the Editors Now Produce in Four Parts], Vol. I: "Ab Initiis Æræ Christianæ ad Annum CCCXXIV" ["From the Beginning of the Christian Era to the Year 324"], col. 1429. The Typographical Society for Ecclesiastical Books (Paris), 1671. (in Latin) ^ Thackery, Francis. Researches into the Ecclesiastical and Political State of Ancient Britain under the Roman Emperors: with Observations upon the Principal Events and Characters Connected with the Christian Religion, during the First Five Centuries, pp. 272 ff. T. Cadell (London), 1843. (in Latin and English) ^ a b "Nomina Episcoporum, cum Clericis Suis, Quinam, et ex Quibus Provinciis, ad Arelatensem Synodum Convenerint" ["The Names of the Bishops with Their Clerics who Came Together at the Synod of Arles and from which Province They Came"] from the Consilia[29] in Thackery[30] ^ a b "Living in Roman London: From Londinium to London". London: The Museum of London. Retrieved 17 February 2015. ^ Hingley, Introduction ^ Wright, Thomas (1852). The Celt, the Roman, and the Saxon: A history of the early inhabitants of Britain, down to the conversion of the Anglo-Saxons to Christianity. London: Arthur Hall, Virtue & Co. p. 95. ^ Perring, Dominic (2011). "Two studies on Roman London. A: London's military origins. B: Population decline and ritual landscapes in Antonine London". Journal of Roman Archaeology. 24: 249–282. doi:10.1017/S1047759400003378. ISSN 1047-7594. ^ Wallace, Lacey (2013). "The Foundation of Roman London: Examining the Claudian Fort Hypothesis". Oxford Journal of Archaeology. 32 (3): 275–291. doi:10.1111/ojoa.12015. ISSN 1468-0092. ^ Wallace, Leslie (2015). The Origin of Roman London. Cambridge University Press. p. 9. ISBN 978-1-107-04757-0. Retrieved 16 February 2018. ^ Hingley, start of Introduction ^ a b c Merrifield, p. 40. ^ It may have spanned the tidal limit of the Thames at the time, with the port in tidal waters and the bridge upstream beyond its reach.[39] This is uncertain, however: in the Middle Ages, the Thames's tidal reach extended to Staines and today it still reaches Teddington. ^ Togodumnus (2011). "Londinivm Avgvsta: Provincial Capital". Roman Britain. Archived from the original on 20 February 2015. Retrieved 16 February 2015. ^ Wacher, pp. 88–90. ^ Number 1 Poultry (ONE 94), Museum of London Archaeology, 2013. Archaeology Data Service, The University of York. ^ Antonine Itinerary. British Routes. Routes 2, 3, & 4. ^ Although three of them used the same route into town.[44] ^ a b c d "Public life: All roads lead to Londinium". Museum of London Group. Retrieved 22 February 2015. ^ Margary, Ivan Donald (1967). Roman Roads in Britain (2nd ed.). London: John Baker. p. 54. ISBN 978-0-319-22942-2. ^ a b c Perring, Dominic (1991). Roman London: The Archaeology of London. Abingdon: Routledge. p. 5. ISBN 978-0-415-62010-9. ^ Fearnside, William Gray; Harral, Thomas (1838). The History of London: Illustrated by Views of London and Westminster. Illustrated by John Woods. London: Orr & Co. p. 15. ^ a b Sheppard, Francis (1998). London: A History. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 12–13. ISBN 978-0-19-822922-3. ^ a b Merrifield, Ralph (1983). London, City of the Romans. Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 116–119. ISBN 978-0-520-04922-2. ^ a b Merrifield, pp. 32–33. ^ Margary,[47] cited by Perring,[48] although he notes that this remains conjectural: the known roads would not meet at the river if continued in a straight line,[48] there is no evidence textual or archaeological at the moment for a ford at Westminster,[48] and the Saxon ford was further upstream at Kingston.[49] Against such doubts, Sheppard notes the known routes broadly direct towards Westminster in a way "inconceivable" if they were meant to be directed towards a ferry at Londinium[50] and Merrifield points to routes directed towards the presumed ford from Southwark.[51] Both include maps of the known routes around London and their proposed reconstruction of major connections now-lost.[50][51][52] ^ Tacitus, Annals, 12.31. ^ H. H. Scullard, From the Gracchi to Nero, 1982, p. 90 ^ John Morris, Londinium: London in the Roman Empire, 1982, pp. 107–108 ^ Cassius Dio, Roman History 62.2 ^ Tacitus, Annals, 14.31 ^ a b c Merrifield, p. 53. ^ "Highbury, Upper Holloway and King's Cross", Old and New London: Volume 2 (1878:273–279). Date accessed: 26 December 2007. ^ Merrifield, pp. 66–68. ^ a b c d "Londinium Today: Basilica and forum". Museum of London Group. Retrieved 19 February 2015. ^ Merrifield, p. 62. ^ Merrifield, p. 63–64. ^ Will Durant (7 June 2011). Caesar and Christ: The Story of Civilization. Simon and Schuster. pp. 468–. ISBN 978-1-4516-4760-0. ^ a b Anne Lancashire (2002). London Civic Theatre: City Drama and Pageantry from Roman Times to 1558. Cambridge University Press. p. 19. ISBN 978-0-521-63278-2. ^ a b c Marsden, Peter (1975). "The Excavation of a Roman Palace Site in London". Transactions of the London and Middlesex Archaeological Society. 26: 1–102. ^ Emerson, Giles (2003). City of Sin: London in Pursuit of Pleasure. Carlton Books. pp. 24–25. ISBN 978-1-84222-901-9. ^ a b Milne. ^ a b Brigham. ^ a b c Hall & Merrifield. ^ a b c Hingley, Richard. Londinium : a biography : Roman London from its origins to the fifth century. Unwin, Christina. London. pp. 116–120. ISBN 978-1-350-04730-3. OCLC 1042078915. ^ Hill, Julian and Rowsome, P. (2011). Roman London and the Walbrook stream crossing : excavations at 1 Poultry and vicinity, City of London. Rowsome, Peter., Museum of London Archaeology. London: Museum of London Archaeology. pp. 354–7. ISBN 978-1-907586-04-0. OCLC 778916833.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) ^ Perring, Dominic (November 2017). "London's Hadrianic War?". Britannia. 48: 37–76. doi:10.1017/S0068113X17000113. ISSN 0068-113X. ^ Fields, Nic (2011). Campaign 233: Boudicca's Rebellion AD 60–61: The Britons rise up against Rome. Illustrated by Peter Dennis. Oxford: Osprey Publishing. ISBN 978-1-84908-313-3. ^ Merrifield, p. 50. ^ a b P. Marsden (1987). The Roman Forum Site in London: Discoveries before 1985. ISBN 978-0-11-290442-7. ^ Merrifield, p. 68. ^ According to a recovered inscription. The location of the Temple of Jupiter has not been discovered yet. ^ a b c d e "Londinium Today: The fort". Museum of London Group. Retrieved 18 February 2015. ^ a b "Londinium Today: The amphitheatre". Museum of London Group. Retrieved 21 February 2015. ^ Roman London Fragments, Cosmetic Cream And Bikini Bottoms ^ a b "Londinium Today: House and baths at Billingsgate". Museum of London Group. Retrieved 20 February 2015. ^ Lepage, Jean-Denis G.G. (2012). British Fortifications through the Reign of Richard III: An Illustrated History. Jefferson: McFarland & Co. p. 90. ISBN 978-0-7864-5918-6. ^ a b c d e f "Visible Roman London: City wall and gates". Museum of London Group. Archived from the original on 19 February 2015. Retrieved 19 February 2015. ^ In the 1170s, William FitzStephen mentioned seven gates in London's landward wall, but it's not clear whether this included a minor postern gate or another, now unknown, major gate. Moorgate was later counted as a seventh major gate after its enlargement in 1415, but in William's time it would have been a minor postern gate.[85] ^ "Timeline of Romans in Britain". Channel4.com. Retrieved 24 August 2012. ^ "Visible Roman London: Temple of Mithras". Museum of London Group. Retrieved 19 February 2015. ^ Trench, Richard; Hillman Ellis (1985). London under London: a subterranean guide. John Murray (publishers) Ltd. pp. 27–29. ISBN 978-0-7195-4080-6. ^ a b c d e "Londinium Today: Riverside wall". Museum of London Group. Retrieved 17 February 2015. ^ Eumenius. ^ The medallion is named for its mint mark from Augusta Treverorum (Trier); it was discovered in Arras, France, in the 1920s. ^ Giraldus Cambriensis [Gerald of Wales]. De Inuectionibus [On Invectives], Vol. II, Ch. I, in Y Cymmrodor: The Magazine of the Honourable Society of Cymmrodorion, Vol. XXX, pp. 130–31. George Simpson & Co. (Devizes), 1920. (in Latin) ^ Gerald of Wales. Translated by W.S. Davies as The Book of Invectives of Giraldus Cambrensis in Y Cymmrodor: The Magazine of the Honourable Society of Cymmrodorion, Vol. XXX, p. 16. George Simpson & Co. (Devizes), 1920. ^ a b c d Denison, Simon (June 1995). "News: In Brief". British Archaeology. Council for British Archaeology. Archived from the original on 13 May 2013. Retrieved 30 March 2013. ^ a b c Keys, David (3 April 1995). "Archaeologists unearth capital's first cathedral: Giant edifice built out of secondhand masonry". The Independent. London. ^ Sankey, D. (1998). "Cathedrals, granaries and urban vitality in late Roman London". In Watson, Bruce (ed.). Roman London: Recent Archaeological Work. JRA Supplementary Series. 24. Portsmouth, RI: Journal of Roman Archaeology. pp. 78–82. ^ Riddell, Jim. "The status of Roman London". Archived from the original on 24 April 2008. ^ a b c "Roman London: A Brief History". Museum of London. Archived from the original on 12 September 2009. ^ Giles, John Allen (ed. & trans.). "The Works of Gildas, Surnamed 'Sapiens,' or the Wise" in Six Old English Chronicles of Which Two Are Now First Translated from the Monkish Latin Originals: Ethelwerd's Chronicle, Asser's Life of Alfred, Geoffrey of Monmouth's British History, Gildas, Nennius, and Richard of Cirencester. Henry G. Bohn (London), 1848. ^ Habington, Thomas (trans.). The Epistle of Gildas the most ancient British Author: who flourished in the yeere of our Lord, 546. And who by his great erudition, sanctitie, and wisdome, acquired the name of Sapiens. Faithfully translated out of the originall Latine in 8 vols. T. Cotes for William Cooke (London), 1638. ^ a b The Ruin of Britain, Ch. 22 ff, John Allen Giles's revision[100] of Thomas Habington's translation,[101] hosted at Wikisource. ^ Jones, Michael E.; Casey, John (1988), "The Gallic Chronicle Restored: a Chronology for the Anglo-Saxon Invasions and the End of Roman Britain", Britannia, XIX (November): 367–98, doi:10.2307/526206, JSTOR 526206, archived from the original on 13 March 2020, retrieved 6 January 2014 ^ Anderson, Alan Orr (October 1912). Watson, Mrs W.J. (ed.). "Gildas and Arthur". The Celtic Review (published 1913). VIII (May 1912 – May 1913) (30): 149–165. doi:10.2307/30070428. JSTOR 30070428. ^ a b Beda Venerabilis [The Venerable Bede]. Historia Ecclesiastica Gentis Anglorum [The Ecclesiastical History of the English People], Vol. I, Ch. XV, & Vol. V, Ch. XXIIII. 731. Hosted at Latin Wikisource. (in Latin) ^ a b Bede. Translated by Lionel Cecil Jane as The Ecclesiastical History of the English Nation, Vol. 1, Ch. 15, & Vol. 5, Ch. 24. J.M. Dent & Co. (London), 1903. Hosted at Wikisource. ^ Anonymous. Translated by James Ingram. The Saxon Chronicle, with an English Translation, and Notes, Critical and Explanatory. To Which Are Added Chronological, Topographical, and Glossarial Indices; a Short Grammar of the Anglo-Saxon Language; a New Map of England during the Heptarchy; Plates of Coins, &c., p. 15., "An. CCCCLV." Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, & Brown (London), 1823. (in Old English and English) ^ The near-contemporary 452 Gallic Chronicle recorded that "The British provinces, which to this time had suffered various defeats and misfortunes, are reduced to Saxon rule" in the year 441;[103] Gildas described a revolt of Saxon foederati[102] but his dating is obscure;[104] Bede dates it to a few years after 449 and opines that invasion had been the Saxons' intention from the beginning;[105][106] the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle dates the revolt to 455.[107] ^ Sheppard, 35, google books ^ Sheppard, 35-36 ^ DNA study finds London was ethnically diverse from start, BBC, 23 November 2015 ^ Poinar, Hendrik N.; Eaton, Katherine; Marshall, Michael; Redfern, Rebecca C. (2017). "'Written in Bone': New Discoveries about the Lives and Burials of Four Roman Londoners". Britannia. 48: 253–277. doi:10.1017/S0068113X17000216. ISSN 0068-113X. ^ Janet Montgomery, Rebecca Redfern, Rebecca Gowland, Jane Evans, Identifying migrants in Roman London using lead and strontium stable isotopes, 2016, Journal of Archaeological Science [1] ^ Grimes, Ch. I. ^ Camden, William (1607), Britannia (in Latin), London: G. Bishop & J. Norton, pp. 306–7 ^ Clark, John (1996). "The Temple of Diana". In Bird, Joanna; et al. (eds.). Interpreting Roman London. Oxbow Monograph. 58. Oxford: Oxbow. pp. 1–9. ^ Grimes, William Francis (1968). "Map of the walled city of London showing areas devastated by bombing, with sites excavated by the Excavation Council". The Excavation of Roman and Mediaeval London. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-317-60471-6. ^ For a map of the locations of bombed sites in the City of London excavated by the Society of Antiquaries of London's Roman and Medieval London Excavation Council during this period, see Grimes.[117] ^ Thorpe, Lewis. The History of the Kings of Britain, p. 19. Penguin, 1966. ^ Galfredus Monemutensis [Geoffrey of Monmouth]. Historia Regnum Britanniae [History of the Kings of Britain], Vol. V, Ch. iv. c. 1136. (in Latin) ^ Geoffrey of Monmouth. Translated by J.A. Giles & al. as Geoffrey of Monmouth's British History, Vol. V, Ch. IV, in Six Old English Chronicles of Which Two Are Now First Translated from the Monkish Latin Originals: Ethelwerd's Chronicle, Asser's Life of Alfred, Geoffrey of Monmouth's British History, Gildas, Nennius, and Richard of Cirencester. Henry G. Bohn (London), 1848. Hosted at Wikisource. ^ Merrifield, p. 57. ^ Morris, John. Londinium: London in the Roman Empire, p. 111. 1982. ^ Grimes, Ch. II, § 2. ^ "Museum of London Act 1965". legislation.gov.uk. National Archives. Retrieved 26 February 2012. References[edit] Billings, Malcolm (1994), London: a companion to its history and archaeology, ISBN 1-85626-153-0 Brigham, Trevor. 1998. “The Port of Roman London.” In Roman London Recent Archeological Work, edited by B. Watson, 23–34. Michigan: Cushing–Malloy Inc. Paper read at a seminar held at The Museum of London, 16 November. Hall, Jenny, and Ralph Merrifield. Roman London. London: HMSO Publications, 1986. Haverfield, F. "Roman London." The Journal of Roman Studies 1 (1911): 141–72. Hingley, Richard, Londinium: A Biography: Roman London from its Origins to the Fifth Century, 2018, Bloomsbury Publishing, ISBN 1350047317, 9781350047310 Inwood, Stephen. A History of London (1998) ISBN 0-333-67153-8 John Wacher: The Towns of Roman Britain, London/New York 1997, p. 88–111. ISBN 0-415-17041-9 Gordon Home: Roman London: A.D. 43–457 Illustrated with black and white plates of artefacts. diagrams and plans. Published by Eyre and Spottiswoode (London) in 1948 with no ISBN. Milne, Gustav. The Port of Roman London. London: B.T. Batsford, 1985. Sheppard, Francis, London: A History, 2000, Oxford University Press, ISBN 0192853694, 9780192853691, google books Further reading[edit] Middle English orthography (most English words containing, not starting, with the sound /ʌn/ are spelt '..on' for obsolete disambiguatory reasons) John Timbs (1867), "Roman London", Curiosities of London (2nd ed.), J.C. Hotten, OCLC 12878129 Wallace, Lacey M., The Origin of Roman London, 2014, Cambridge Classical Studies, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 1107047579, 9781107047570 External links[edit] Wikimedia Commons has media related to Londinium. Roman London, History of World Cities Roman London, Encyclopædia Britannica A map of known and conjectural Roman roads around Londinium, from London: A History The eastern cemetery of Roman London: excavations 1983–90, Museum of London Archive v t e History of London Evolution Londinium Lundenwic City of London City of Westminster Middlesex County of London Greater London Timeline Periods Roman London Anglo-Saxon London Norman and Medieval London Tudor London Stuart London 18th-century London 19th-century London 1900–1939 World War II (The Blitz) 1945–2000 21st century Events Peasants' Revolt Black Death Great Plague Great Fire 1854 cholera outbreak Great Stink Great Exhibition 1908 Franco-British Exhibition The Battle of Cable Street Festival of Britain Great Smog Coronation of Queen Elizabeth II Swinging London London Plan 1966 FIFA World Cup Final Hyde Park and Regent's Park bombings Funeral of Princess Diana Anti-war protests 7/7 bombings Olympic Games (1908 1948 2012) 2012 Summer Paralympics Grenfell Tower fire COVID-19 pandemic Government Historic Metropolitan Board of Works London County Council Greater London Council Current Greater London Authority London Assembly Mayor of London Politics Parties Labour Conservatives Liberal Democrats London independence Services Bow Street Runners Metropolitan Police London Ambulance Service London Fire Brigade Port of London Authority London sewerage system London Underground London Metropolitan Archives City of London City of London Corporation Lord Mayor of the City of London Wards of the City of London Guildhall Livery Companies Lord Mayor's Show City of London Police Bank of England Structures St Paul's Cathedral Tower of London Palace of Whitehall Westminster Hall London Bridge Tower Bridge Westminster Abbey Big Ben The Monument Fortifications Category v t e Major towns of Roman Britain Placenames in brackets are either present-day names or counties where the towns formerly existed. Capitals Britannia Superior Londinium (London) Britannia Inferior Eboracum (York) Camulodunum (Colchester) Surviving Caesaromagus (Chelmsford) Corinium Dobunnorum (Cirencester) Deva Victrix (Chester) Durnovaria (Dorchester) Durovernum Cantiacorum (Canterbury) Glevum (Gloucester) Isca Augusta (Caerleon) Isca Dumnoniorum (Exeter) Isurium Brigantum (Aldborough) Lactodurum (Towcester) Lindum Colonia (Lincoln) Luguvalium (Carlisle) Moridunum (Carmarthen) Noviomagus Reginorum (Chichester) Petuaria (Brough) Ratae Corieltauvorum (Leicester) Venta Belgarum (Winchester) Venta Silurum (Caerwent) Verulamium (St Albans) Viroconium Cornoviorum (Wroxeter) Extinct Alchester (Wendlebury) Bannaventa (Northamptonshire) Calleva Atrebatum (Hampshire) Cunetio (Wiltshire) Venta Icenorum (Norfolk) List of Roman place names in Britain v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films Coordinates: 51°30′45.00″N 0°05′26.16″W / 51.5125000°N 0.0906000°W / 51.5125000; -0.0906000 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Londinium&oldid=993087361" Categories: 40s establishments in the Roman Empire 1st-century establishments in Roman Britain 17th-century archaeological discoveries Archaeological sites in London Former populated places in Greater London History of London by period History of the City of London Populated places established in the 1st century Populated places disestablished in the 5th century Roman London Roman auxiliary forts in England Hidden categories: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list Articles with Latin-language sources (la) Webarchive template wayback links Articles containing Latin-language text CS1: long volume value Articles with Old English-language sources (ang) CS1 Latin-language sources (la) Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata EngvarB from July 2020 Articles containing Old English (ca. 450-1100)-language text All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from February 2015 Commons category link is on Wikidata AC with 0 elements Coordinates on Wikidata Use dmy dates from April 2017 Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Languages العربية Dansk Deutsch Español Euskara فارسی Français Frysk Galego 한국어 Bahasa Indonesia IsiZulu Íslenska Italiano עברית ქართული Latina Magyar Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Norsk nynorsk Polski Português Română Русский Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Svenska Tagalog ไทย Українська اردو 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 8 December 2020, at 18:41 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2071 ---- Leptis Magna - Wikipedia Leptis Magna From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Leptis Magna The Arch of Septimius Severus in Leptis Magna Shown within Libya Alternative name Lepcis Magna, Neapolis, Lpqy Location Khoms, Libya Region Tripolitania Coordinates 32°38′21″N 14°17′26″E / 32.63917°N 14.29056°E / 32.63917; 14.29056Coordinates: 32°38′21″N 14°17′26″E / 32.63917°N 14.29056°E / 32.63917; 14.29056 Type Settlement History Founded 7th c. BC Abandoned 7th c. AD Periods Iron Age to Byzantine Cultures Carthaginian Libyco-Berber Roman UNESCO World Heritage Site Official name Archaeological Site of Leptis Magna Type Cultural Criteria i, ii, iii Designated 1982 (6th session) Reference no. 183 State Party Libya Region North Africa Leptis or Lepcis Magna, also known by other names in antiquity, was a prominent city of the Carthaginian Empire and Roman Libya at the mouth of the Wadi Lebda in the Mediterranean. Originally a 7th-century BC Phoenician foundation, it was greatly expanded under Roman Emperor Septimius Severus (r. 193–211), who was a native of the city. The 3rd Augustan Legion was stationed here to defend the city against Berber incursions. After the legion's dissolution under Gordian III in 238, the city was increasingly open to raids in the later part of the 3rd century. Diocletian reinstated the city as provincial capital, and it grew again in prosperity until it fell to the Vandals in 439. It was reincorporated into the Eastern Empire in 533 but continued to be plagued by Berber raids and never recovered its former importance. It fell to the Muslim invasion in c. 647 and was subsequently abandoned. Its ruins are within present-day Khoms, Libya, 130 km (81 mi) east of Tripoli. They are among the best-preserved Roman sites in the Mediterranean. Contents 1 Names 2 History 2.1 Phoenicians 2.2 Roman Republic 2.3 Roman Empire 2.4 Vandal Kingdom 2.5 Byzantine Empire 2.6 Islamic conquest 2.7 Excavation 3 Gallery 4 See also 5 References 5.1 Citations 5.2 Bibliography 6 Further reading 7 External links Names[edit] The Punic name of the settlement was written LPQ (Punic: 𐤋𐤐𐤒) or LPQY (𐤋𐤐𐤒𐤉).[1][2][3] This has been tentatively connected to the Semitic root (present in Arabic) LFQ, meaning "to build" or "to piece together", presumably in reference to the construction of the city.[4] This name was hellenized as Léptis (Ancient Greek: Λέπτις),[5] also known as Léptis Megálē (Λέπτις μεγάλη, "Greater Leptis") distinguishing it from the "Lesser Leptis" closer to Carthage in modern-day Tunisia. It was also known by the Greeks as Neápolis (Νεάπολις, "New Town"). The latinization of these names was Lepcis or Leptis Magna ("Greater Leptis"), which also appeared as the "Leptimagnese City" (Latin: Leptimagnensis Civitas). The Latin demonym was "Leptitan" (Leptitanus). It was also known as Ulpia Traiana as a Roman colony.[3] Its Italian name is Lepti Maggiore, and in Arabic it is named Labdah (لَبْدَة).[6][7] History[edit] Map of Leptis Magna Severan Basilica Angling in the 1st century CE. Villa of the Nile Mosaic, Leptis Magna, Tripoli National Museum. Phoenicians[edit] The Phoenician city was founded in the second half of the 7th century BC. Little is known about Leptis during this time, but it appears to have been powerful enough to repel Dorieus's attempt to establish a Greek colony nearby around 515 BC.[2] Like most western Phoenician settlements, Leptis became part of the Carthaginian Empire and fell under Rome's control with Carthage's defeat in the Punic Wars. Leptis remained highly independent for a period after about 111 BC. Roman Republic[edit] The Roman Republic sent some colonists together with a small garrison in order to control the city. The city prospered and was even allowed to coin its own money in silver and bronze. Reflecting its blend of cultures, its coins bore Punic inscriptions but images of Hercules and Dionysus.[3] Soon Italian merchants settled in the city and started a profitable commerce with the Libyan interior.[8] The city depended primarily on the fertility of its surrounding farmland, where many olive-presses have been excavated. By 46 BC, its olive oil production was of such an extent that the city was able to provide three million pounds of oil annually to Julius Caesar as tax.[2] Roman Empire[edit] Kenneth D. Matthews, Jr. writes:[9] During the reign of Augustus, Leptis Magna was classified as a civitas libera et immunis, or a free community, over which the governor had an absolute minimum of control. As such Leptis retain its two suphetes at the head of its government, with the mhzm, similar to the Roman aediles, as minor magistrates. In addition there were such sacred officials as the ʾaddir ʾararim or praefectus sacrorum, the nēquim ēlīm, and probably a sacred college of fifteen members. Leptis Magna remained as such until the reign of the Roman emperor Tiberius, when the city and the surrounding area were formally incorporated into the empire as part of the province of Africa. It soon became one of the leading cities of Roman Africa and a major trading post. The city grew rapidly under Roman administration. During the reign of Nero, an amphitheater was constructed. The settlement was elevated to municipium in AD 64 or 65 and to colonia under Trajan (r. 98–117) Leptis achieved its greatest prominence beginning in AD 193, as the hometown of emperor Septimius Severus. Septimius favored his hometown above all other provincial cities, and the buildings and wealth he lavished on it made Leptis Magna the third-most important city in Africa, rivaling Carthage and Alexandria. In AD 205, he and the imperial family visited the city and bestowed great honors. Among the changes that Severus introduced were the creation of a magnificent new forum and the rebuilding of the docks. The natural harbor had a tendency to silt up, but the Severan changes made this worse, and the eastern wharves are extremely well preserved, since they were scarcely used. Leptis overextended itself during this period. During the Crisis of the 3rd Century, when trade declined precipitously, Leptis Magna's importance also fell into a decline, and by the middle of the 4th century, even before it was completely devastated by the 365 tsunami, large parts of the city had been abandoned. Ammianus Marcellinus recounts that the crisis was worsened by a corrupt Roman governor named Romanus, who demanded bribes to protect the city during a major tribal raid. The ruined city could not pay these and complained to the emperor Valentinian I. Romanus then bribed people at court and arranged for the Leptan envoys to be punished "for bringing false accusations". It enjoyed a minor renaissance beginning in the reign of the emperor Theodosius I. Vandal Kingdom[edit] In 439, Leptis Magna and the rest of the cities of Tripolitania fell under the control of the Vandals when their king, Gaiseric, captured Carthage from the Romans and made it his capital. Unfortunately for the future of Leptis Magna, Gaiseric ordered the city's walls demolished so as to dissuade its people from rebelling against Vandal rule. The people of Leptis and the Vandals both paid a heavy price for this in AD 523 when a group of Berber raiders sacked the city. Byzantine Empire[edit] Belisarius, general of Emperor Justinian I of the Byzantine Empire, recaptured Leptis Magna in the name of the Roman Empire ten years later, and in 533/4 it was re-incorporated into the empire. Leptis became a provincial capital of the Eastern Empire, but never recovered from the destruction wreaked upon it by the Berbers. In 544, under the prefecture of Sergius, the city came under intensified attack of Berber tribes, and after some successes, Sergius was reduced to retreating into the city, with the Leuathae tribal confederation camped outside the gate demanding payments. Sergius admitted eighty deputies into the city to present their demands, but when Sergius moved to leave the conference he was detained by the robe by one deputy and crowded by others. This provoked an officer of the prefect's guard to kill the deputy laying hands on the prefect, which resulted in a general massacre. The Berbers reacted with an all-out attack and Sergius was eventually forced to abandon Leptis and retreat to Carthage.[10] Islamic conquest[edit] By the 6th century, the city was fully Christianized.[11][failed verification] During the decade 565–578 AD Christian missionaries from Leptis Magna even began to move once more among the Berber tribes as far south as the Fezzan in the Libyan desert and converted the Garamantes.[12] Numerous new churches were built in the 6th century,[13] but the city continued to decline, and by the time of the Arab conquest around 647 the city was mostly abandoned except for a Byzantine garrison force and a population of less than 1,000 inhabitants. By the 10th century, the city of Al-Khums had fully absorbed it.[14] Excavation[edit] Today, the site of Leptis Magna is the site of some of the most impressive ruins of the Roman period. Part of an ancient temple was brought from Leptis Magna to the British Museum in 1816 and installed at the Fort Belvedere royal residence in England in 1826. It now lies in part of Windsor Great Park.[15] The ruins are located between the south shore of Virginia Water and Blacknest Road close to the junction with the A30 London Road and Wentworth Drive. Theater When Italians conquered Italian Libya in the early 20th century, they dedicated huge efforts to the rediscovery of Leptis Magna. In the early 1930s Italian archeological research was able to show again the buried remains of nearly all the city.[16][page needed] A 4th to 3rd century BC necropolis was found under the Roman theater. In June 2005, it was revealed that archaeologists from the University of Hamburg had been working along the coast of Libya when they uncovered a 30 ft length of five colorful mosaics created during the 1st or 2nd century. The mosaics show with exceptional clarity depictions of a warrior in combat with a deer, four young men wrestling a wild bull to the ground, and a gladiator resting in a state of fatigue and staring at his slain opponent. The mosaics decorated the walls of a cold plunge pool in a bath house within a Roman villa at Wadi Lebda in Leptis Magna. The gladiator mosaic is noted by scholars as one of the finest examples of representational mosaic art ever seen—a "masterpiece comparable in quality with the Alexander Mosaic in Pompeii." The mosaics were originally discovered in the year 2000 but were kept secret in order to avoid looting. They are currently on display in the Leptis Magna Museum.[17] There were reports that Leptis Magna was used as a cover for tanks and military vehicles by pro-Gaddafi forces during the First Libyan Civil War in 2011.[18] When asked about the possibility of conducting an air-strike on the historic site, NATO refused to rule out the possibility of such an action saying that it had not been able to confirm the rebels' report that weapons were being hidden at the location.[19] Shortly after the war, Libyan archaeologist Hafed Walda reported that Leptis Magna, along with nearby Rasaimergib Fort and the western Tripolis of Sabratha, had "so far seen no visible loss" from either fighting on the ground or bombings conducted by international forces.[20] In the midst of the Second Libyan Civil War and the disappearance of governmental and international support for the site, people living in the area organized to voluntarily protect and maintain Leptis Magna.[21][22] Gallery[edit] Columns (on the stage) Columns (on the stage) Ruins Small Gate (Western side) Theater Theater (side view) Amphitheater Marketplace Arch of Septimius Severus Some of Leptis Magna yet to be excavated One of the entrances to the theater (external view) View on Leptis Magna from the theater wall Street view (from Arch of Septimius Severus arch to Arch of Trajan) Market place Market place Measure converter, Market (founded 8 or 9 BC) (Phoenician colony) Severan Basilica, Leptis Magna 2nd century AD Stairs inside Septimius Severus Basilica Decorative columns inside Basilica of Septimius Severus Severan Basilica Forum in Leptis Magna, 2nd century AD See also[edit] Ancient Rome portal Libya portal Caesarea, Numidia Cirta Lambaesis Thysdrus Timgad Volubilis References[edit] Citations[edit] ^ Ghaki (2015), p. 67. ^ a b c Brogan & Wilson (2012). ^ a b c Head (1911). ^ Lipiński (2004), p. 345. ^ Strabo, Geography, §17.3.18. ^ "لَبْدَة, Libya". National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency. 30 June 2006. Archived from the original on 2020-05-23 – via Geographic.org. ^ Leptis Magna at the Encyclopædia Britannica ^ Bullo (2002), pp. 167–171. ^ Matthews (1957), p. 37. ^ Beechey & Beechey (1828), pp. 54–56. ^ Mommsen (1909), Chapter XIII. The African Provinces. ^ Prevost (2007), pp. 462–463. ^ Livius.org, Photos: Lepcis Magna, Byzantine Church. ^ Bullo (2002), pp. 185–188. ^ The Atlantic, 10 January 2018. ^ Musso (2010). ^ The Times, 13 June 2005. ^ The Times, 14 June 2011. ^ CNN, 14 June 2011. ^ AP, 4 November 2011. ^ AFP, 23 December 2016. ^ Reuters, 28 November 2017. Bibliography[edit] Alberge, Dalya (13 June 2005). "Roman mosaic 'worthy of Botticelli'". The Times. Retrieved 2020-08-31. Lay summary – The Roman Hideout. Beechey, Frederick William; Beechey, Henry William (1828). Proceedings of the Expedition to Explore the Northern Coast of Africa, from Tripoly Eastward; in MDCCCXXI and MDCCCXXII. Comprehending an Account of the Greater Syrtis and Cyrenaica; and of the Ancient Cities Composing the Pentapolis. London: John Murray. OCLC 719432955. Brogan, Olwen Phillis Frances; Wilson, R. J. A. (2012). "Lepcis Magna". In Hornblower, Simon; Spawforth, Antony; Eidinow, Esther (eds.). The Oxford Classical Dictionary (4th ed.). Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. p. 821. ISBN 9780199545568. Bullo, Silvia (2002). Provincia Africa. Le città e il territorio dalla caduta di Cartagine a Nerone [Province of Africa: The Cities and the Territory from the Fall of Carthage to Nero]. Le Rovine Circolari, 4 (in Italian). Rome: L'Erma di Bretschneider. ISBN 9788882651688. Coghlan, Tom (14 June 2011). "Wonder of the Ancient World at risk as Gaddafi uses ruins to hide deadly rockets". The Times. Archived from the original on 2020-08-31. Cooper, Paul (10 January 2018). "How Ancient Roman Ruins Ended Up 2,000 Miles Away in a British Garden". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on 2019-12-23. D'Emilio, Frances (4 November 2011). "Expert: NATO raids spared Libyan antiquities". The San Diego Union-Tribune. Associated Press. Archived from the original on 2020-08-31. De Miro, Ernesto; Polito, Antonella (2005). Leptis Magna. Dieci anni di scavi archeologici nell area del Foro Vecchio. I livelli fenici, punici e romani [Leptis Magna: Ten Years of Archaeological Excavations in the Area of the Old Forum. The Phoenician, Punic and Roman Levels.]. Quaderni di Archeologia della Libya, 19 (in Italian and Arabic). Rome: L’Erma di Bretschneider. ISBN 9788882653095. Floriani Squarciapino, Maria (1966). Leptis Magna. Ruinenstädte Nordafrikas, 2 (in German). Basel: Raggi Verlag. OCLC 625443. Ghaki, Mansour (2015). "Toponymie et onomastique. L'apport de l'ecriture punique neopunique" [Toponymy and Onomastics: The Contribution of Neopunic Punic Writing] (PDF). In Di Tolla, Anna Maria (ed.). La lingua nella vita e la vita della lingua. Itinerari e percorsi degli studi berberi. Miscellanea per il Centenario di studi berberi a "L'Orientale" di Napoli. Scritti in onore di Francesco Beguinot [Language in Life and the Life of Language: Routes and Paths of Berber Studies. Miscellany for the Centenary of Berber Studies at "L'Orientale" in Naples: Written in Honor of Francesco Beguinot.]. Studi Africanistici: Quaderni di Studi Berberi e Libico-Berberi, 4 (in French). Naples: Unior. pp. 65–71. ISBN 9788867191253. Retrieved 2020-08-31 – via Academia.edu. Head, Barclay; et al. (assisted by G. F. Hill, George MacDonald, and W. Wroth) (1911). "Syrtica". Historia Numorum (2nd ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 875 – via Digital Historia Numorum, ed. Ed Snible. Kreikenbom, Detlev (2007). "Leptis Magna vor der arabischen Eroberung" [Leptis Magna Before the Arab Conquest]. In Kreikenbom, Detlev; Muth, Franz-Christoph; Thielmann, Jörn (eds.). Arabische Christen – Christen in Arabien [Arab Christians – Christians in Arabia]. Nordostafrikanisch-Westasiatische Studien, 6 (in German). Frankfurt am Main & New York: Peter Lang. pp. 35–54. ISBN 9783631550403. Lamloun, Imed (23 December 2016). "The unlikely saviors of Libya's Roman remains". The Daily Star. Agence France-Presse. Archived from the original on 2020-08-31. Lendering, Jona (13 August 2020). "Lepcis Magna". Livius.org. Archived from the original on 2020-08-31. Lewis, Aidan (28 November 2017). "Famed Libyan ruins rely on locals for support". Reuters. Archived from the original on 2018-12-21. Lipiński, Edward (2004). Itineraria Phoenicia. Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta, 127; Studia Phoenicia, 18. Leuven; Paris; Dudley, MA: Uitgeverij Peeters en Departement Oosterse Studies. ISBN 9789042913448. Matthews, Kenneth D., Jr. (1957). Cities in the Sand: Leptis Magna and Sabratha in Roman Africa. Photographs by Alfred W. Cook. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. OCLC 414295. Mattingly, D. J. (2000). "Map 35: Tripolitana". In Talbert, Richard J. A. (ed.). Barrington Atlas of the Greek and Roman World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN 9780691031699. Mommsen, Theodor (1909) [1886]. The Provinces of the Roman Empire from Caesar to Diocletian. 2. Translated by Dickson, William P. (Corrected ed.). London: Macmillan. OCLC 4308504. Musso, Luisa (2010). Contributions by Daniela Baldoni, Barbara Bianchi, Maria Gloria Calì, Barbara Davidde, Ginette Di Vita-Evrard, Massimiliano Munzi, Roberto Petriaggi, Beatrice Pinna Caboni, Gianni Ponti & Ramadan Shebani. "Missione archeologica dell'Università Roma Tre, 1998-2007" [Archaeological Mission of Roma Tre University, 1998-2007] (PDF). The Department of Archaeology of Libya. Libya Antiqua (in English and Italian). Pisa & Rome: Fabrizio Serra Editore. N.S., vol. V: 49–78. OCLC 4221464. Retrieved 2020-08-31 – via Academia.edu. Prevost, Virginie (2007). "Les dernières communautés chrétiennes autochtones d'Afrique du Nord" [The Last Native Christian Communities of North Africa]. Revue de l'histoire des religions (in French). 224 (4): 461–483. doi:10.4000/rhr.5401. JSTOR 23618252. Robin, Daniel (2010). This Holy Seed: Faith, Hope and Love in the Early Churches of North Africa (2nd ed.). Chester: Tamarisk Publications. ISBN 9780953856534. Strabo (1903) [1854]. The Geography of Strabo. Bohn's Classical Library. 3 vols. Translated by Hamilton, H. C.; Falconer, W. London: George Bell & Sons. OCLC 250411. Swails, Brent; Ward, Damien; Perez Maestro, Laura; Abdelaziz, Salma; Pleitgen, Frederik & Khadder, Kareem (14 June 2011). "South African president blasts NATO actions in Libya". CNN. Archived from the original on 2020-06-14. Tomlinson, R. A. (1993). "Lepcis Magna". From Mycenae to Constantinople: The Evolution of the Ancient City. London & New York: Routledge. pp. 191–202. ISBN 9780203412909. Further reading[edit] Babelon, E.C.F. (1911). "Leptis § Leptis Magna" . Encyclopædia Britannica. 16 (11th ed.). p. 482. Bianchi Bandinelli, Ranuccio; Vergara Caffarelli, Ernesto; Caputo, Giacomo (1966). The Buried City: Excavations at Leptis Magna. Photographs by Fabrizio Clerici. New York: F. A. Praeger. OCLC 670109. Draper, Robert (February 2013). "New Old Libya". National Geographic. Photographs by George Steinmetz. Archived from the original on 2020-08-30. Huß, Werner; Niemeyer, Hans Georg (2006). "Leptis Magna". In Cancik, Hubert; Schneider, Helmuth; Salazar, Christine F. (eds.). Brill's New Pauly: Encyclopaedia of the Ancient World. Antiquity. 7. Leiden: Brill. doi:10.1163/1574-9347_bnp_e701890. ISBN 9789004122598. Smith, Gemma (February 2013). "Archaeologists, propaganda and the military: Libya's cultural heritage and the role of archaeologists in a political crisis". The Post Hole. Department of Archaeology, University of York (27). Archived from the original on 2020-07-16. Ward-Perkins, J. B. (1993). Kenrick, Philip (ed.). The Severan Buildings Of Lepcis Magna: An Architectural Survey (PDF). Society for Libyan Studies Monograph, 2. With a contribution by Barri Jones and Roger Ling; architectural drawings prepared and edited by R. Kronenburg. London: The Society for Libyan Studies, on behalf of the Department of Antiquities, Tripoli, SPLAJ. ISBN 9780950836362. Retrieved 2020-08-31. External links[edit] Wikimedia Commons has media related to Leptis Magna. Lepcis Magna - The Roman Empire in Africa, documenting the archaeological site and excavations undertaken in the 1990s, including teams from King's College London and the UCL Institute of Archaeology Lepcis Magna article on Livius.org Lepcis (Leptis) Magna Images, a gallery of photographs taken at the site in February 2008 Neapolis/Lepcis Magna on Pleiades, a collaborative scholarly gazetteer to the ancient world v t e World Heritage Sites in Libya Archaeological Site of Cyrene Archaeological Site of Leptis Magna Archaeological Site of Sabratha Old Town of Ghadamès Rock-Art Sites of Tadrart Acacus v t e Phoenician cities and colonies Algeria Camarata Cartennae (Tenes) Hippo Regius Icosium (Algiers) Igilgili (Jijel) Iol (Cherchell) Iomnium (Tigzirt) Kirtan (Constantine) Kissi (Djinet) Macomades Malaca Rachgoun Rusazus (Azeffoun) Rusguniae (Tamentfoust) Rusicade (Skikda) Rusippisir (Taksebt) Rusubbicari (Zemmouri El Bahri) Rusuccuru (Dellys) Sarai (Aïn Oulmene) Thagora (Taoura) Tipasa in Mauretania Tipasa in Numidia Timici Cyprus Dhali Kition (Larnaca) Lapathus Marion Greece Callista (Santorini) Paxi Rhodes Israel Achzib Akka (Acre) Dora Michal Jaffa Reshef Shikmona (Haifa) Strato's Tower (Caesarea) Italy Agrigento Bitan (Chia) Cape Melqart (Cefalù) Drepanum (Trapani) Eryx (Erice) Heraclea Minoa Kapara (Soluntum) Karaly (Cagliari) Lilybaeum Motya Neapolis Nora Olbia Pantelleria Selinunte Sulci (Sant'Antioco) Tharros Ziz (Palermo) Lebanon Amia Ampi Arqa Athar (Tripoli) Baalbek Birut (Beirut) Botrys Gebal (Byblos) Sarepta Sur (Tyre) Sidon Ushu Libya Lepcis (Khoms) Oyat (Tripoli) Tsabratan Malta Maleth (Mdina) Gaulos (Gozo) Għajn Qajjet Mtarfa Ras il-Wardija Tas-Silġ Morocco Azama (Azemmour) Arambys (Mogador) Caricus Murus Heq she Elisha (Ksar es-Seghir) Likush (Larache) Shalat (Chellah) Tamusida Tinga (Tangier) Portugal Portus Hannibalis Portus Magonis (Portimão) Olissipona (Lisbon) Ossonoba (Faro) Spain Abdera (Adra) Abyla (Ceuta) Akra Leuka (Alicante) Gadir (Cadiz) Herna Iboshim (Ibiza) Mahón Malake (Málaga) Onoba Carthage (Cartagena) Rushadir (Melilla) Saguntum Sexi (Almunecar) Tagilit (Tíjola) Toscanos (Velez) Tyreche Syria Aynook (Arwad) Marat (Amrit) Safita Shuksi Sumur Ugarit Tunisia Aspis (Kelibia) Bulla Regia Carthage Hadrumetum (Sousse) Hippo Diarrhytus (Bizerte) Kerkouane Lepcis (Monastir) Maqom Hadesh (Ounga) Meninx (Djerba) Ruspe Ruspina Sicca (El Kef) Tabarka Tayinat (Thyna) Thapsus Thysdrus (El Djem) Utica Other Myriandus Phoenicus  /  Gibraltar v t e Romano-Berber cities in Roman North Africa Sorted by contemporary national borders Morocco Anfa Iulia Constantia Zilil Iulia Valentia Banasa Iulia Campestris Babba Lixus 2 Mogador Sala 1 Tamuda 1 Thamusida Tingis Volubilis 1 Algeria Aquae Calidae Albulae Altava Auzia Calama Caesarea Cartennas Castellum Dimmidi Castellum Tingitanum Castra Nova Cirta Civitas Popthensis Collo Cohors Breucorum Cuicul 1 Diana Veteranorum Gemellae Gunugus Hippo Regius Icosium 1 Igilgili Iomnium Lamasba Lambaesis Madauros Mascula Mesarfelta Milevum Oppidum Novum Parthenia Pomaria Portus Divinus Portus Magnus Quiza Xenitana Rapidum Rusguniae Rusucurru Saldae Setifis Siga Thagaste Thamugadi 1 Theveste Thibilis Thubursicum Tiddis Tingartia Tipasa 1 Tubusuctu Tubunae Unica Colonia Uzinaza Vescera Zaraï Zuccabar Tunisia Althiburos Bulla Regia Capsa Carthago 1 Cillium Dougga 1 Gightis Hadrumetum 1 Hippo Diarrhytus Kelibia Leptis Parva Mactaris Pheradi Majus Pupput Rucuma Ruspae Scillium Sicca Simitthus Sufetula Tacapae Taparura Sufes Thabraca Thanae Thapsus Thuburbo Majus Thuburnica Thysdrus Turris Tamalleni Utica Uthina Vaga Zama Regia Egypt Siwa Qara Farafra Spain Septem Rusadir Kingdoms and provinces Mauretania Mauretania Tingitana Mauretania Caesariensis Numidia Roman Africa Creta et Cyrenaica Roman Egypt Diocese of Africa Zeugitana Byzacena Vandal Kingdom Praetorian prefecture of Africa Exarchate of Africa Related articles North Africa during Antiquity African Romance Limes Tripolitanus Christianity in Roman Africa Early African Church Church of Carthage Roman colonies in Berber Africa 1 UNESCO World Heritage Sites 2 Proposed v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films Authority control BNF: cb120762613 (data) GND: 4111264-7 NKC: ge644114 SUDOC: 029057051 VcBA: 497/1162 VIAF: 229742148 WorldCat Identities: viaf-229742148 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Leptis_Magna&oldid=991396092" Categories: World Heritage Sites in Libya Roman sites in Libya Phoenician colonies in Lybia History of Tripolitania Populated places established in the 2nd millennium BC World Heritage Sites in Danger Former populated places in Libya Al Khums Catholic titular sees in Africa Populated places of the Byzantine Empire Ruins in Libya Buildings and structures in Murqub District Ancient Berber cities Roman amphitheaters in North Africa Roman theatres Roman fortifications in Roman Africa Ancient Greek geography-North Africa Carthage Hidden categories: Articles with Encyclopædia Britannica links Coordinates on Wikidata Articles containing Punic-language text Articles containing Ancient Greek (to 1453)-language text Articles containing Latin-language text Articles containing Arabic-language text All articles with failed verification Articles with failed verification from August 2020 Wikipedia articles needing page number citations from August 2020 CS1 Italian-language sources (it) CS1 Arabic-language sources (ar) CS1 German-language sources (de) CS1 French-language sources (fr) CS1: long volume value Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica with Wikisource reference Commons category link is on Wikidata Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikivoyage Languages العربية Asturianu Azərbaycanca Български Brezhoneg Català Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français Gaeilge Galego Հայերեն Hrvatski Bahasa Indonesia Íslenska Italiano עברית ქართული Kiswahili Latina Lietuvių Magyar मैथिली مصرى မြန်မာဘာသာ Nederlands नेपाली 日本語 Norsk bokmål Occitan Polski Português Română Русский Scots Shqip Sicilianu Slovenščina Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Türkçe Українська اردو Tiếng Việt 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 29 November 2020, at 21:00 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2082 ---- Aurelius Victor - Wikipedia Aurelius Victor From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Sextus Aurelius Victor Afer (c. 320 – c. 390) was a historian and politician of the Roman Empire. Victor was the author of a short history of imperial Rome, entitled De Caesaribus and covering the period from Augustus to Constantius II. The work was published in 361. Under the emperor Julian (361-363), Victor served as governor of Pannonia Secunda; in 389 he became praefectus urbi (urban prefect), senior imperial official in Rome.[1] Contents 1 Works 2 See also 3 Notes 4 References 5 External links Works[edit] Four small historical works have been ascribed to him, although only his authorship of De Caesaribus is securely established: Origo Gentis Romanae De Viris Illustribus Romae De Caesaribus (for which Aurelius Victor used the Enmannsche Kaisergeschichte) Epitome de Caesaribus (attributed) The four have generally been published together under the name Historia Romana. The second was first printed at Naples about 1472, in 4to, under the name of Pliny the Younger, and the fourth in Strasbourg in 1505.[2] The first edition of all four books was that of Andreas Schottus (8 volumes, Antwerp, 1579). A recent edition of the De Caesaribus is by Pierre Dufraigne (Collection Budé, 1975). See also[edit] Sirmium Sremska Mitrovica Syrmia Tetrarchy Praetorian prefecture Praetorian prefecture of Illyricum Roman provinces Roman Empire Notes[edit] ^ Ammianus Marcellinus, xxi.10. ^ Chisholm 1911. References[edit]  This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Victor, Sextus Aurelius". Encyclopædia Britannica. 28 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. H.W. Bird (1994) Aurelius Victor: De Caesaribus. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press. H.W. Bird (1984) Sextus Aurelius Victor: A Historiographical Study. Liverpool: Francis Cairns. W. den Boer (1972) Some Minor Roman Historians. Leiden: Brill. P. Dufraigne (1975) Aurelius Victor: Livre de Cesars. Paris: Les Belles Lettres. D. Rohrbacher (2002) The Historians of Late Antiquity. London: Routledge. External links[edit] Chaumont, M.L. (1987). "AURELIUS VICTOR". Encyclopaedia Iranica, Vol. III, Fasc. 1. pp. 28–29.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link) Works by Aurelius Victor in thelatinlibrary.com (Latin text) Works by Aurelius Victor in forumromanum.org (Latin, English and French texts) Sexti Aurelii Victoris quae vulgo habentur scripta historica, Friedrich Schroeter (ed.), 2 voll., Lipsiae, sumptibus Augusti Lehnholdi, 1829-31 (contains Origo and De viris illustribus). Sexti Aurelii Victoris de caesaribus liber, Franciscus Pichlmayr (ed.), Monachii, typos curavit F. Straub, 1892. Sexti Aurelii Victoris historia romana, Lipsiae, sumptibus succ. Ottonis Holtze, 1892 (contains the opera omnia). Sexti Aurelii Victoris historia romana, Th. Chr. Harlesii (ed.), 2 voll., Londini, curante et imprimente A. J. Valpy, 1829: vol. 1, vol. 2 (contains the opera omnia). Authority control BIBSYS: 95000275 BNE: XX825524 BNF: cb118895764 (data) CANTIC: a10043810 CiNii: DA00879594 GND: 119072009 ISNI: 0000 0001 1766 9251 LCCN: n80008471 NKC: jn19990000318 NLA: 35658267 NLG: 92539 NLI: 000137829 NLP: A10511453 NSK: 000382511 NTA: 069616450 SELIBR: 281706 SNAC: w6qd0hcm SUDOC: 026696800 Trove: 1030083 VcBA: 495/45569 VIAF: 64001057 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n80008471 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aurelius_Victor&oldid=995359854" Categories: 320 births 390 deaths Ancient Roman politicians Latin historians 4th-century historians 4th-century Romans Aurelii Hidden categories: Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica with Wikisource reference Wikipedia articles incorporating text from the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica CS1 maint: ref=harv Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CANTIC identifiers Wikipedia articles with CINII identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLG identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLI identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLP identifiers Wikipedia articles with NSK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SNAC-ID identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with Trove identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Year of birth uncertain Year of death uncertain Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Languages العربية Azərbaycanca Български Brezhoneg Català Čeština Cymraeg Deutsch Ελληνικά Español Esperanto فارسی Français Frysk Galego Հայերեն Hrvatski Bahasa Indonesia Italiano עברית ქართული Кыргызча Latina Lietuvių Magyar Nederlands Polski Português Română Русский Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Taqbaylit Українська Tiếng Việt 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 20 December 2020, at 16:46 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2092 ---- Petrarch - Wikipedia Petrarch From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search For the thoroughbred racehorse, see Petrarch (horse). For the crater on Mercury, see Petrarch (crater). 14th-century Italian scholar and poet Francesco Petrarca Petrarch portrait by Altichiero Born Francesco Petracco (1304-07-20)July 20, 1304 Comune of Arezzo Died July 19, 1374(1374-07-19) (aged 69) Arquà, Padua, Republic of Venice (now Padua, Italy) Resting place Arquà Petrarca Occupation Scholar, poet Language Italian, Latin Nationality Aretine Alma mater University of Montpellier University of Bologna Period Early Renaissance Literary movement Renaissance humanism Notable works Triumphs Il Canzoniere Notable awards Poet laureate of Padua Partner unknown woman or women Children Giovanni (1337–1361) Francesca (born in 1343) Relatives Eletta Canigiani (mother) Ser Petracco (father) Santa Maria della Pieve in Arezzo La Casa del Petrarca (birthplace) at Vicolo dell'Orto, 28 in Arezzo Francesco Petrarca (Italian: [franˈtʃesko peˈtrarka]; July 20, 1304 – July 18/19, 1374), commonly anglicized as Petrarch (/ˈpiːtrɑːrk, ˈpɛt-/), was an Aretine scholar and poet during the early Italian Renaissance, and one of the earliest humanists.[1] Petrarch's rediscovery of Cicero's letters is often credited with initiating the 14th-century Italian Renaissance and the founding of Renaissance humanism.[2] In the 16th century, Pietro Bembo created the model for the modern Italian language based on Petrarch's works, as well as those of Giovanni Boccaccio, and, to a lesser extent, Dante Alighieri.[3] Petrarch would be later endorsed as a model for Italian style by the Accademia della Crusca. Petrarch's sonnets were admired and imitated throughout Europe during the Renaissance and became a model for lyrical poetry. He is also known for being the first to develop the concept of the "Dark Ages."[4] Contents 1 Biography 1.1 Youth and early career 1.2 Mount Ventoux 1.3 Later years 2 Works 2.1 Laura and poetry 2.2 Sonnet 227 3 Dante 4 Philosophy 5 Legacy 6 Works in English translation 7 See also 8 Notes 9 References 10 Further reading 11 External links Biography[edit] Youth and early career[edit] Petrarch was born in the Tuscan city of Arezzo on 20 July 1304. He was the son of Ser Petracco and his wife Eletta Canigiani. His given name was Francesco Petracco, which was Latinized to Petrarca. Petrarch's younger brother was born in Incisa in Val d'Arno in 1307. Dante Alighieri was a friend of his father.[5] Petrarch spent his early childhood in the village of Incisa, near Florence. He spent much of his early life at Avignon and nearby Carpentras, where his family moved to follow Pope Clement V, who moved there in 1309 to begin the Avignon Papacy. Petrarch studied law at the University of Montpellier (1316–20) and Bologna (1320–23) with a lifelong friend and schoolmate called Guido Sette. Because his father was in the legal profession (a notary), he insisted that Petrarch and his brother also study law. Petrarch, however, was primarily interested in writing and Latin literature and considered these seven years wasted. Additionally, he proclaimed that through legal manipulation his guardians robbed him of his small property inheritance in Florence, which only reinforced his dislike for the legal system. He protested, "I couldn't face making a merchandise of my mind," as he viewed the legal system as the art of selling justice.[5] Petrarch was a prolific letter writer and counted Boccaccio among his notable friends to whom he wrote often. After the death of their parents, Petrarch and his brother Gherardo went back to Avignon in 1326, where he worked in numerous clerical offices. This work gave him much time to devote to his writing. With his first large-scale work, Africa, an epic in Latin about the great Roman general Scipio Africanus, Petrarch emerged as a European celebrity. On April 8, 1341, he became the second [6] poet laureate since antiquity and was crowned by Roman Senatori Giordano Orsini and Orso dell'Anguillara on the holy grounds of Rome's Capitol.[7][8][9] He traveled widely in Europe, served as an ambassador, and (because he traveled for pleasure,[10] as with his ascent of Mont Ventoux), has been called "the first tourist".[11] During his travels, he collected crumbling Latin manuscripts and was a prime mover in the recovery of knowledge from writers of Rome and Greece. He encouraged and advised Leontius Pilatus's translation of Homer from a manuscript purchased by Boccaccio, although he was severely critical of the result. Petrarch had acquired a copy, which he did not entrust to Leontius,[12] but he knew no Greek; Petrarch said, "Homer was dumb to him, while he was deaf to Homer".[13] In 1345 he personally discovered a collection of Cicero's letters not previously known to have existed, the collection Epistulae ad Atticum, in the Chapter Library (Biblioteca Capitolare) of Verona Cathedral.[14] Disdaining what he believed to be the ignorance of the centuries preceding the era in which he lived, Petrarch is credited or charged with creating the concept of a historical "Dark Ages".[4] Mount Ventoux[edit] Main article: Ascent of Mont Ventoux Summit of Mont Ventoux Petrarch recounts that on April 26, 1336, with his brother and two servants, he climbed to the top of Mont Ventoux (1,912 meters (6,273 ft), a feat which he undertook for recreation rather than necessity.[15] The exploit is described in a celebrated letter addressed to his friend and confessor, the monk Dionigi di Borgo San Sepolcro, composed some time after the fact. In it, Petrarch claimed to have been inspired by Philip V of Macedon's ascent of Mount Haemo and that an aged peasant had told him that nobody had ascended Ventoux before or after himself, 50 years before, and warned him against attempting to do so. The nineteenth-century Swiss historian Jacob Burckhardt noted that Jean Buridan had climbed the same mountain a few years before, and ascents accomplished during the Middle Ages have been recorded, including that of Anno II, Archbishop of Cologne.[16][17] Scholars[18] note that Petrarch's letter[19][20] to Dionigi displays a strikingly "modern" attitude of aesthetic gratification in the grandeur of the scenery and is still often cited in books and journals devoted to the sport of mountaineering. In Petrarch, this attitude is coupled with an aspiration for a virtuous Christian life, and on reaching the summit, he took from his pocket a volume by his beloved mentor, Saint Augustine, that he always carried with him.[21] For pleasure alone he climbed Mont Ventoux, which rises to more than six thousand feet, beyond Vaucluse. It was no great feat, of course; but he was the first recorded Alpinist of modern times, the first to climb a mountain merely for the delight of looking from its top. (Or almost the first; for in a high pasture he met an old shepherd, who said that fifty years before he had attained the summit, and had got nothing from it save toil and repentance and torn clothing.) Petrarch was dazed and stirred by the view of the Alps, the mountains around Lyons, the Rhone, the Bay of Marseilles. He took Augustine's Confessions from his pocket and reflected that his climb was merely an allegory of aspiration toward a better life.[22] As the book fell open, Petrarch's eyes were immediately drawn to the following words: And men go about to wonder at the heights of the mountains, and the mighty waves of the sea, and the wide sweep of rivers, and the circuit of the ocean, and the revolution of the stars, but themselves they consider not.[19] Petrarch's response was to turn from the outer world of nature to the inner world of "soul": I closed the book, angry with myself that I should still be admiring earthly things who might long ago have learned from even the pagan philosophers that nothing is wonderful but the soul, which, when great itself, finds nothing great outside itself. Then, in truth, I was satisfied that I had seen enough of the mountain; I turned my inward eye upon myself, and from that time not a syllable fell from my lips until we reached the bottom again. ... [W]e look about us for what is to be found only within. ... How many times, think you, did I turn back that day, to glance at the summit of the mountain which seemed scarcely a cubit high compared with the range of human contemplation[19] James Hillman argues that this rediscovery of the inner world is the real significance of the Ventoux event.[23] The Renaissance begins not with the ascent of Mont Ventoux but with the subsequent descent—the "return [...] to the valley of soul", as Hillman puts it. Arguing against such a singular and hyperbolic periodization, Paul James suggests a different reading: In the alternative argument that I want to make, these emotional responses, marked by the changing senses of space and time in Petrarch’s writing, suggest a person caught in unsettled tension between two different but contemporaneous ontological formations: the traditional and the modern.[24] Later years[edit] Petrarch spent the later part of his life journeying through northern Italy as an international scholar and poet-diplomat. His career in the Church did not allow him to marry, but he is believed to have fathered two children by a woman or women unknown to posterity. A son, Giovanni, was born in 1337, and a daughter, Francesca, was born in 1343. He later legitimized both.[25] Petrarch's Arquà house near Padua where he retired to spend his last years Giovanni died of the plague in 1361. In the same year Petrarch was named canon in Monselice near Padua. Francesca married Francescuolo da Brossano (who was later named executor of Petrarch's will) that same year. In 1362, shortly after the birth of a daughter, Eletta (the same name as Petrarch's mother), they joined Petrarch in Venice to flee the plague then ravaging parts of Europe. A second grandchild, Francesco, was born in 1366, but died before his second birthday. Francesca and her family lived with Petrarch in Venice for five years from 1362 to 1367 at Palazzo Molina; although Petrarch continued to travel in those years. Between 1361 and 1369 the younger Boccaccio paid the older Petrarch two visits. The first was in Venice, the second was in Padua. About 1368 Petrarch and his daughter Francesca (with her family) moved to the small town of Arquà in the Euganean Hills near Padua, where he passed his remaining years in religious contemplation. He died in his house in Arquà early on July 20, 1374—his seventieth birthday. The house hosts now a permanent exhibition of Petrarchian works and curiosities; inside is the famous tomb of Petrarch's beloved cat who was embalmed, among other objects. On the marble slab there is a Latin inscription written by Antonio Quarenghi: Etruscus gemino vates ardebat amore: Maximus ignis ego; Laura secundus erat. Quid rides? divinæ illam si gratia formæ, Me dignam eximio fecit amante fides. Si numeros geniumque sacris dedit illa libellis Causa ego ne sævis muribus esca forent. Arcebam sacro vivens a limine mures, Ne domini exitio scripta diserta forent; Incutio trepidis eadem defuncta pavorem, Et viget exanimi in corpore prisca fides.[26] Petrarch's will (dated April 4, 1370) leaves 50 florins to Boccaccio "to buy a warm winter dressing gown"; various legacies (a horse, a silver cup, a lute, a Madonna) to his brother and his friends; his house in Vaucluse to its caretaker; for his soul, and for the poor; and the bulk of his estate to his son-in-law, Francescuolo da Brossano, who is to give half of it to "the person to whom, as he knows, I wish it to go"; presumably his daughter, Francesca, Brossano's wife. The will mentions neither the property in Arquà nor his library; Petrarch's library of notable manuscripts was already promised to Venice, in exchange for the Palazzo Molina. This arrangement was probably cancelled when he moved to Padua, the enemy of Venice, in 1368. The library was seized by the lords of Padua, and his books and manuscripts are now widely scattered over Europe.[27] Nevertheless, the Biblioteca Marciana traditionally claimed this bequest as its founding, although it was in fact founded by Cardinal Bessarion in 1468.[28] Works[edit] Original lyrics by Petrarch, found in 1985 in Erfurt Petrarch's Virgil (title page) (c. 1336) Illuminated manuscript by Simone Martini, 29 x 20 cm Biblioteca Ambrosiana, Milan. The Triumph of Death, or The 3 Fates. Flemish tapestry (probably Brussels, c. 1510–1520). Victoria and Albert Museum, London. The three Fates, Clotho, Lachesis and Atropos, who spin, draw out and cut the thread of life, represent Death in this tapestry, as they triumph over the fallen body of Chastity. This is the third subject in Petrarch's poem "The Great Triumphs". First, Love triumphs; then Love is overcome by Chastity, Chastity by Death, Death by Fame, Fame by Time and Time by Eternity Petrarch is best known for his Italian poetry, notably the Rerum vulgarium fragmenta ("Fragments of Vernacular Matters"), a collection of 366 lyric poems in various genres also known as 'canzoniere' ('songbook'), and the Triumphi ("Triumphs"), a six-part narrative poem of Dantean inspiration. However, Petrarch was an enthusiastic Latin scholar and did most of his writing in this language. His Latin writings include scholarly works, introspective essays, letters, and more poetry. Among them are Secretum ("My Secret Book"), an intensely personal, imaginary dialogue with a figure inspired by Augustine of Hippo; De Viris Illustribus ("On Famous Men"), a series of moral biographies; Rerum Memorandarum Libri, an incomplete treatise on the cardinal virtues; De Otio Religiosorum ("On Religious Leisure")[29] and De Vita Solitaria ("On the Solitary Life"), which praise the contemplative life; De Remediis Utriusque Fortunae ("Remedies for Fortune Fair and Foul"), a self-help book which remained popular for hundreds of years; Itinerarium ("Petrarch's Guide to the Holy Land"); invectives against opponents such as doctors, scholastics, and the French; the Carmen Bucolicum, a collection of 12 pastoral poems; and the unfinished epic Africa. He translated seven psalms, a collection known as the Penitential Psalms.[30] Petrarch revived the work and letters of the ancient Roman Senator Marcus Tullius Cicero Petrarch also published many volumes of his letters, including a few written to his long-dead friends from history such as Cicero and Virgil. Cicero, Virgil, and Seneca were his literary models. Most of his Latin writings are difficult to find today, but several of his works are available in English translations. Several of his Latin works are scheduled to appear in the Harvard University Press series I Tatti.[31] It is difficult to assign any precise dates to his writings because he tended to revise them throughout his life. Petrarch collected his letters into two major sets of books called Rerum familiarum liber ("Letters on Familiar Matters") and Seniles ("Letters of Old Age"), both of which are available in English translation.[32] The plan for his letters was suggested to him by knowledge of Cicero's letters. These were published "without names" to protect the recipients, all of whom had close relationships to Petrarch. The recipients of these letters included Philippe de Cabassoles, bishop of Cavaillon; Ildebrandino Conti, bishop of Padua; Cola di Rienzo, tribune of Rome; Francesco Nelli, priest of the Prior of the Church of the Holy Apostles in Florence; and Niccolò di Capoccia, a cardinal and priest of Saint Vitalis. His "Letter to Posterity" (the last letter in Seniles)[33] gives an autobiography and a synopsis of his philosophy in life. It was originally written in Latin and was completed in 1371 or 1372—the first such autobiography in a thousand years (since Saint Augustine).[34][35] While Petrarch's poetry was set to music frequently after his death, especially by Italian madrigal composers of the Renaissance in the 16th century, only one musical setting composed during Petrarch's lifetime survives. This is Non al suo amante by Jacopo da Bologna, written around 1350. Laura and poetry[edit] This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (April 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) On April 6, 1327,[36] after Petrarch gave up his vocation as a priest, the sight of a woman called "Laura" in the church of Sainte-Claire d'Avignon awoke in him a lasting passion, celebrated in the Rerum vulgarium fragmenta ("Fragments of Vernacular Matters"). Laura may have been Laura de Noves, the wife of Count Hugues de Sade (an ancestor of the Marquis de Sade). There is little definite information in Petrarch's work concerning Laura, except that she is lovely to look at, fair-haired, with a modest, dignified bearing. Laura and Petrarch had little or no personal contact. According to his "Secretum", she refused him because she was already married. He channeled his feelings into love poems that were exclamatory rather than persuasive, and wrote prose that showed his contempt for men who pursue women. Upon her death in 1348, the poet found that his grief was as difficult to live with as was his former despair. Later in his "Letter to Posterity", Petrarch wrote: "In my younger days I struggled constantly with an overwhelming but pure love affair—my only one, and I would have struggled with it longer had not premature death, bitter but salutary for me, extinguished the cooling flames. I certainly wish I could say that I have always been entirely free from desires of the flesh, but I would be lying if I did". Laura de Noves While it is possible she was an idealized or pseudonymous character—particularly since the name "Laura" has a linguistic connection to the poetic "laurels" Petrarch coveted—Petrarch himself always denied it. His frequent use of l'aura is also remarkable: for example, the line "Erano i capei d'oro a l'aura sparsi" may both mean "her hair was all over Laura's body", and "the wind ("l'aura") blew through her hair". There is psychological realism in the description of Laura, although Petrarch draws heavily on conventionalised descriptions of love and lovers from troubadour songs and other literature of courtly love. Her presence causes him unspeakable joy, but his unrequited love creates unendurable desires, inner conflicts between the ardent lover and the mystic Christian, making it impossible to reconcile the two. Petrarch's quest for love leads to hopelessness and irreconcilable anguish, as he expresses in the series of paradoxes in Rima 134 "Pace non trovo, et non ò da far guerra;/e temo, et spero; et ardo, et son un ghiaccio": "I find no peace, and yet I make no war:/and fear, and hope: and burn, and I am ice".[37] Laura is unreachable and evanescent – descriptions of her are evocative yet fragmentary.Francesco De Sanctis on the powerful music of his verse in his Storia della letteratura italiana. Gianfranco Contini, in a famous essay ("Preliminari sulla lingua del Petrarca". Petrarca, Canzoniere. Turin, Einaudi, 1964) has described Petrarch's language in terms of "unilinguismo" (contrasted with Dantean "plurilinguismo"). Sonnet 227[edit] Original Italian[38] English translation by A.S. Kline[39] Aura che quelle chiome bionde et crespe cercondi et movi, et se’ mossa da loro, soavemente, et spargi quel dolce oro, et poi ’l raccogli, e ’n bei nodi il rincrespe, tu stai nelli occhi ond’amorose vespe mi pungon sí, che ’nfin qua il sento et ploro, et vacillando cerco il mio tesoro, come animal che spesso adombre e ’ncespe: ch’or me ’l par ritrovar, et or m’accorgo ch’i’ ne son lunge, or mi sollievo or caggio, ch’or quel ch’i’ bramo, or quel ch’è vero scorgo. Aër felice, col bel vivo raggio rimanti; et tu corrente et chiaro gorgo, ché non poss’io cangiar teco vïaggio? Breeze, blowing that blonde curling hair, stirring it, and being softly stirred in turn, scattering that sweet gold about, then gathering it, in a lovely knot of curls again, you linger around bright eyes whose loving sting pierces me so, till I feel it and weep, and I wander searching for my treasure, like a creature that often shies and kicks: now I seem to find her, now I realise she’s far away, now I’m comforted, now despair, now longing for her, now truly seeing her. Happy air, remain here with your living rays: and you, clear running stream, why can’t I exchange my path for yours? Dante[edit] Dante Alighieri, detail from a Luca Signorelli fresco in the chapel of San Brizio, Duomo, Orvieto. Petrarch is a world apart from Dante and his Divina Commedia. In spite of the metaphysical subject, the Commedia is deeply rooted in the cultural and social milieu of turn-of-the-century Florence: Dante's rise to power (1300) and exile (1302); his political passions call for a "violent" use of language, where he uses all the registers, from low and trivial to sublime and philosophical. Petrarch confessed to Boccaccio that he had never read the Commedia, remarks Contini, wondering whether this was true or Petrarch wanted to distance himself from Dante. Dante's language evolves as he grows old, from the courtly love of his early stilnovistic Rime and Vita nuova to the Convivio and Divina Commedia, where Beatrice is sanctified as the goddess of philosophy—the philosophy announced by the Donna Gentile at the death of Beatrice.[40] In contrast, Petrarch's thought and style are relatively uniform throughout his life—he spent much of it revising the songs and sonnets of the Canzoniere rather than moving to new subjects or poetry. Here, poetry alone provides a consolation for personal grief, much less philosophy or politics (as in Dante), for Petrarch fights within himself (sensuality versus mysticism, profane versus Christian literature), not against anything outside of himself. The strong moral and political convictions which had inspired Dante belong to the Middle Ages and the libertarian spirit of the commune; Petrarch's moral dilemmas, his refusal to take a stand in politics, his reclusive life point to a different direction, or time. The free commune, the place that had made Dante an eminent politician and scholar, was being dismantled: the signoria was taking its place. Humanism and its spirit of empirical inquiry, however, were making progress—but the papacy (especially after Avignon) and the empire (Henry VII, the last hope of the white Guelphs, died near Siena in 1313) had lost much of their original prestige.[41] Petrarch polished and perfected the sonnet form inherited from Giacomo da Lentini and which Dante widely used in his Vita nuova to popularise the new courtly love of the Dolce Stil Novo. The tercet benefits from Dante's terza rima (compare the Divina Commedia), the quatrains prefer the ABBA–ABBA to the ABAB–ABAB scheme of the Sicilians. The imperfect rhymes of u with closed o and i with closed e (inherited from Guittone's mistaken rendering of Sicilian verse) are excluded, but the rhyme of open and closed o is kept. Finally, Petrarch's enjambment creates longer semantic units by connecting one line to the following. The vast majority (317) of Petrarch's 366 poems collected in the Canzoniere (dedicated to Laura) were sonnets, and the Petrarchan sonnet still bears his name.[42] Philosophy[edit] Petrarch Statue of Petrarch on the Uffizi Palace, in Florence Petrarch is traditionally called the father of Humanism and considered by many to be the "father of the Renaissance."[43] In his work Secretum meum he points out that secular achievements did not necessarily preclude an authentic relationship with God. Petrarch argued instead that God had given humans their vast intellectual and creative potential to be used to their fullest.[44] He inspired humanist philosophy which led to the intellectual flowering of the Renaissance. He believed in the immense moral and practical value of the study of ancient history and literature—that is, the study of human thought and action. Petrarch was a devout Catholic and did not see a conflict between realizing humanity's potential and having religious faith. A highly introspective man, he shaped the nascent humanist movement a great deal because many of the internal conflicts and musings expressed in his writings were seized upon by Renaissance humanist philosophers and argued continually for the next 200 years. For example, Petrarch struggled with the proper relation between the active and contemplative life, and tended to emphasize the importance of solitude and study. In a clear disagreement with Dante, in 1346 Petrarch argued in his De vita solitaria that Pope Celestine V's refusal of the papacy in 1294 was as a virtuous example of solitary life.[45] Later the politician and thinker Leonardo Bruni (1370–1444) argued for the active life, or "civic humanism". As a result, a number of political, military, and religious leaders during the Renaissance were inculcated with the notion that their pursuit of personal fulfillment should be grounded in classical example and philosophical contemplation.[46] Legacy[edit] Petrarch's tomb at Arquà Petrarca Petrarch's influence is evident in the works of Serafino Ciminelli from Aquila (1466–1500) and in the works of Marin Držić (1508–1567) from Dubrovnik.[47] The Romantic composer Franz Liszt set three of Petrarch's Sonnets (47, 104, and 123) to music for voice, Tre sonetti del Petrarca, which he later would transcribe for solo piano for inclusion in the suite Années de Pèlerinage. Liszt also set a poem by Victor Hugo, " O quand je dors" in which Petrarch and Laura are invoked as the epitome of erotic love. While in Avignon in 1991, Modernist composer Elliott Carter completed his solo flute piece Scrivo in Vento which is in part inspired by and structured by Petrarch's Sonnet 212, Beato in sogno. It was premiered on Petrarch's 687th birthday.[48] In November 2003, it was announced that pathological anatomists would be exhuming Petrarch's body from his casket in Arquà Petrarca, in order to verify 19th-century reports that he had stood 1.83 meters (about six feet), which would have been tall for his period. The team from the University of Padua also hoped to reconstruct his cranium in order to generate a computerized image of his features to coincide with his 700th birthday. The tomb had been opened previously in 1873 by Professor Giovanni Canestrini, also of Padua University. When the tomb was opened, the skull was discovered in fragments and a DNA test revealed that the skull was not Petrarch's,[49] prompting calls for the return of Petrarch's skull. The researchers are fairly certain that the body in the tomb is Petrarch's due to the fact that the skeleton bears evidence of injuries mentioned by Petrarch in his writings, including a kick from a donkey when he was 42.[50] Works in English translation[edit] Francesco Petrarch, Letters on Familiar Matters (Rerum familiarium libri), translated by Aldo S. Bernardo (New York: Italica Press, 2005). Volume 1, Books 1–8; Volume 2, Books 9–16; Volume 3, Books 17–24[ISBN missing] Francesco Petrarch, Letters of Old Age (Rerum senilium libri), translated by Aldo S. Bernardo, Saul Levin & Reta A. Bernardo (New York: Italica Press, 2005). Volume 1, Books 1–9; Volume 2, Books 10–18[ISBN missing] Francesco Petrarch, My Secret Book, (Secretum), translated by Nicholas Mann. Harvard University Press[ISBN missing] Francesco Petrarch, On Religious Leisure (De otio religioso), edited & translated by Susan S. Schearer, introduction by Ronald G. Witt (New York: Italica Press, 2002)[ISBN missing] Francesco Petrarch, The Revolution of Cola di Rienzo, translated from Latin and edited by Mario E. Cosenza; 3rd, revised, edition by Ronald G. Musto (New York; Italica Press, 1996)[ISBN missing] Francesco Petrarch, Selected Letters, vol. 1 and 2, translated by Elaine Fantham. Harvard University Press[ISBN missing] See also[edit] Italy portal Literature portal Otium Notes[edit] ^ Rico, Francisco; Marcozzi, Luca (2015). "Petrarca, Francesco". Dizionario Biografico degli Italiani (in Italian). 82. Istituto dell'Enciclopedia Italiana. ^ This designation appears, for instance, in a recent review of Carol Quillen's Rereading the Renaissance. ^ In the Prose della volgar lingua, Bembo proposes Petrarch and Boccaccio as models of Italian style, while expressing reservations about emulating Dante's usage. ^ a b Renaissance or Prenaissance, Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. 4, No. 1. (Jan. 1943), pp. 69–74; Theodore E. Mommsen, "Petrarch's Conception of the 'Dark Ages'" Speculum 17.2 (April 1942: 226–242); JSTOR link to a collection of several letters in the same issue. ^ a b J.H. Plumb, The Italian Renaissance, 1961; Chapter XI by Morris Bishop "Petrarch", pp. 161–175; New York, American Heritage Publishing, ISBN 0-618-12738-0 ^ after "Albertino Mussato" who was the first to be so crowned according to Robert Weiss, The Renaissance Discovery of Classical Antiquity (Oxford, 1973) ^ Plumb, p. 164 ^ Pietrangeli (1981), p. 32 ^ Kirkham, Victoria (2009). Petrarch: A Critical Guide to the Complete Works. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. p. 9. ISBN 978-0226437439. ^ Bishop, Morris Petrarch and his World, p. 92, Indiana University Press 1963, ISBN 0-8046-1730-9 ^ NSA Family Encyclopedia, Petrarch, Francesco, Vol. 11, p. 240, Standard Education Corp. 1992 ^ Vittore Branca, Boccaccio; The Man and His Works, tr. Richard Monges, pp. 113–118 ^ Ep. Fam. 18.2 §9 ^ "History – Biblioteca Capitolare Verona". ^ Nicolson, Marjorie Hope; Mountain Gloom and Mountain Glory: The Development of the Aesthetics of the Infinite (1997), p. 49; ISBN 0-295-97577-6 ^ Burckhardt, Jacob. The Civilisation of the Period of the Renaissance in Italy (1860). Translated by S.G.C. Middlemore. Swan Sonnenschein (1904), pp. 301–302. ^ Lynn Thorndike, Renaissance or Prenaissance, Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. 4, No. 1. (Jan. 1943), pp. 69–74. JSTOR link to a collection of several letters in the same issue. ^ Such as J.H. Plumb, in his book The Italian Renaissance, ^ a b c Familiares 4.1 translated by Morris Bishop, quoted in Plumb. ^ Asher, Lyell (1993). "Petrarch at the Peak of Fame". PMLA. 108 (5): 1050–1063. doi:10.2307/462985. JSTOR 462985. ^ McLaughlin, Edward Tompkins; Studies in Medieval Life and Literature, p. 6, New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1894 ^ Plumb, J.H. (1961). The Horizon Book of the Renaissance. New York: American Heritage. p. 26. ^ Hillman, James (1977). Revisioning Psychology. Harper & Row. pp. 197. ISBN 978-0-06-090563-7. ^ James, Paul (Spring 2014). "Emotional Ambivalence across Times and Spaces: Mapping Petrarch's Intersecting Worlds". Exemplaria. 26 (1): 82. doi:10.1179/1041257313Z.00000000044. S2CID 191454887. Retrieved August 4, 2015. ^ Plumb, p. 165 ^ The last lay of Petrarch's cat, Notes and Queries, Vol. V, Number 121, February 21, 1852, Author: Various, Editor: George Bell ^ Bishop, pp. 360, 366. Francesca and the quotes from there;[clarification needed] Bishop adds that the dressing-gown was a piece of tact: "fifty florins would have bought twenty dressing-gowns". ^ Tedder, Henry Richard; Brown, James Duff (1911). "Libraries § Italy" . In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. 16 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 573. ^ Francesco Petrarch, On Religious Leisure (De otio religioso), edited & translated by Susan S. Schearer, introduction by Ronald G. Witt (New York: Italica Press, 2002). ^ Sturm-Maddox, Sara (2010). Petrarch's Laurels. Pennsylvania State UP. p. 153. ISBN 978-0271040745. ^ "I Tatti Renaissance Library/Forthcoming and Published Volumes". Hup.harvard.edu. Retrieved July 31, 2009. ^ Letters on Familiar Matters (Rerum familiarium libri), translated by Aldo S. Bernardo, 3 vols.' and Letters of Old Age (Rerum senilium libri), translated by Aldo S. Bernardo, Saul Levin & Reta A. Bernardo, 2 vols. ^ Petrarch's Letter to Posterity (1909 English translation, with notes, by James Harvey Robinson) ^ Wilkins Ernest H (1964). "On the Evolution of Petrarch's Letter to Posterity". Speculum. 39 (2): 304–308. doi:10.2307/2852733. JSTOR 2852733. S2CID 164097201. ^ Plumb, p. 173 ^ April 6, 1327 is often thought to be Good Friday based on poems 3 and 211 of Petrarch's Rerum vulgarium fragmenta, but in fact that date fell on Monday in 1327. The apparent explanation is that Petrarch was not referring to the variable date of Good Friday but to the date fixed by the death of Christ in absolute time, which at the time was thought to be April 6 (Mark Musa, Petrarch's Canzoniere, Indiana University Press, 1996, p. 522). ^ "Petrarch (1304–1374). The Complete Canzoniere: 123–183". www.poetryintranslation.com. ^ "Canzoniere (Rerum vulgarium fragmenta)/Aura che quelle chiome bionde et crespe - Wikisource". ^ "Petrarch (1304–1374) - the Complete Canzoniere: 184-244". ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on November 12, 2013. Retrieved December 28, 2013.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) ^ "The Oregon Petrarch Open Book – "Petrarch is again in sight"". petrarch.uoregon.edu. ^ "Movements : Poetry through the Ages". www.webexhibits.org. ^ See for example Rudolf Pfeiffer, History of Classical Scholarship 1300–1850, Oxford University Press, 1976, p. 1; Gilbert Highet, The Classical Tradition, Oxford University Press, 1949, p. 81–88. ^ Famous First Facts International, H.W. Wilson Company, New York 2000, ISBN 0-8242-0958-3, p. 303, item 4567. ^ Petrarca, Francesco (1879). De vita Solitaria (in Italian). Bologna: Gaetano Romagnoli. ^ "Edizioni Ghibli, Il Rinascimento e Petrarca" (in Italian). edizionighibli.com. August 18, 2016. Retrieved September 6, 2019. ^ Encyclopedia of the Renaissance: Class-Furió Ceriol, Vol. 2, p. 106, Paul F. Grendler, Renaissance Society of America, Scribner's published in association with the Renaissance Society of America, 1999. ISBN 978-0-684-80509-2 ^ Spencer, Patricia (2008) "Regarding Scrivo in Vento: A Conversation with Elliott Carter" Flutest Quarterly summer. ^ Caramelli D, Lalueza-Fox C, Capelli C, et al. (November 2007). "Genetic analysis of the skeletal remains attributed to Francesco Petrarch". Forensic Sci. Int. 173 (1): 36–40. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.01.020. PMID 17320326. ^ "UPF.edu" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on March 6, 2009. Retrieved March 1, 2009. References[edit] Bartlett, Kenneth R. (1992). The Civilization of the Italian Renaissance; a Source Book. Lexington: D.C. Heath and Company. ISBN 0-669-20900-7 Bishop, Morris (1961). "Petrarch." In J. H. Plumb (Ed.), Renaissance Profiles, pp. 1–17. New York: Harper & Row. ISBN 0-06-131162-6 . Hanawalt, A. Barbara (1998). The Middle Ages: An Illustrated History pp. 131–132 New York: Oxford University Press[ISBN missing] James, Paul (2014). "Emotional Ambivalence across Times and Spaces: Mapping Petrarch's Intersecting Worlds". Exemplaria. 26 (1): 81–104. doi:10.1179/1041257313z.00000000044. S2CID 191454887. Kallendorf, Craig. "The Historical Petrarch," The American Historical Review, Vol. 101, No. 1 (Feb. 1996): 130–141. Further reading[edit] Bernardo, Aldo (1983). "Petrarch." In Dictionary of the Middle Ages, volume 9 Celenza, Christopher S. (2017). Petrarch: Everywhere a Wanderer. London: Reaktion. ISBN 978-1780238388 Hennigfeld, Ursula (2008). Der ruinierte Körper. Petrarkistische Sonette in transkultureller Perspektive. Würzburg, Königshausen & Neumann, 2008, ISBN 978-3-8260-3768-9 Hollway-Calthrop, Henry (1907). Petrarch: His Life and Times, Methuen. From Google Books Kohl, Benjamin G. (1978). "Francesco Petrarch: Introduction; How a Ruler Ought to Govern His State," in The Earthly Republic: Italian Humanists on Government and Society, ed. Benjamin G. Kohl and Ronald G. Witt, 25–78. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. ISBN 0-8122-1097-2 Nauert, Charles G. (2006). Humanism and the Culture of Renaissance Europe: Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-54781-4 Rawski, Conrad H. (1991). Petrarch's Remedies for Fortune Fair and Foul A Modern English Translation of De remediis utriusque Fortune, with a Commentary. ISBN 0-253-34849-8 Robinson, James Harvey (1898). Petrarch, the First Modern Scholar and Man of Letters Harvard University Kirkham, Victoria and Armando Maggi (2009). Petrarch: A Critical Guide to the Complete Works. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-43741-5. A. Lee, Petrarch and St. Augustine: Classical Scholarship, Christian Theology and the Origins of the Renaissance in Italy, Brill, Leiden, 2012, ISBN 978-9004224032 N. Mann, Petrarca [Ediz. orig. Oxford University Press (1984)] – Ediz. ital. a cura di G. Alessio e L. Carlo Rossi – Premessa di G. Velli, LED Edizioni Universitarie, Milano, 1993, ISBN 88-7916-021-4 Il Canzoniere» di Francesco Petrarca. La Critica Contemporanea, G. Barbarisi e C. Berra (edd.), LED Edizioni Universitarie, Milano, 1992, ISBN 88-7916-005-2 G. Baldassari, Unum in locum. Strategie macrotestuali nel Petrarca politico, LED Edizioni Universitarie, Milano, 2006, ISBN 88-7916-309-4 Francesco Petrarca, Rerum vulgarium Fragmenta. Edizione critica di Giuseppe Savoca, Olschki, Firenze, 2008, ISBN 978-88-222-5744-4 Plumb, J. H., The Italian Renaissance, Houghton Mifflin, 2001, ISBN 0-618-12738-0 Giuseppe Savoca, Il Canzoniere di Petrarca. Tra codicologia ed ecdotica, Olschki, Firenze, 2008, ISBN 978-88-222-5805-2 Roberta Antognini, Il progetto autobiografico delle "Familiares" di Petrarca, LED Edizioni Universitarie, Milano, 2008, ISBN 978-88-7916-396-5 Paul Geyer und Kerstin Thorwarth (hg), Petrarca und die Herausbildung des modernen Subjekts (Göttingen, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2009) (Gründungsmythen Europas in Literatur, Musik und Kunst, 2) External links[edit] Petrarchat Wikipedia's sister projects Media from Wikimedia Commons Quotations from Wikiquote Texts from Wikisource Petrarch and his Cat Muse Petrarch from the Catholic Encyclopedia Excerpts from his works and letters Francesco Petrarca (Petrarch) (1304-1374) Works by Petrarch at Project Gutenberg Works by or about Francesco Petrarca at Internet Archive Works by or about Petrarch at Internet Archive Works by Petrarch at LibriVox (public domain audiobooks) Timeline of life of Petrarch Poems From The Canzoniere, translated by Tony Kline. Francesco Petrarch at The Online Library of Liberty De remediis utriusque fortunae, Cremonae, B. de Misintis ac Caesaris Parmensis, 1492. (Vicifons) Free scores of works by Petrarch in the Choral Public Domain Library (ChoralWiki) Petrarch and Laura Multi-lingual site including translated works in the public domain and biography, pictures, music. Petrarch - the poet who lost his head April 2004 article in The Guardian regarding the exhumation of Petrarch's remains Oregon Petrarch Open Book – A working database-driven hypertext in and around Francis Petrarch's Rerum Vulgarium Fragmenta (Canzoniere) Historia Griseldis From the Rare Book and Special Collections Division at the Library of Congress Francesco Petrarch, De viris illustribus, digitized French codex, at Somni v t e Petrarch Works Poetry Canzoniere (Rerum vulgarium fragmenta) Africa Trionfi Bucolicum carmen Treatises De viris illustribus De remediis utriusque fortunae De vita solitaria De otio religiosorum Rerum memorandarum libri Epistles Familiares "Ascent of Mont Ventoux" Liber sine nomine Seniles Letter to Posterity Others Secretum Itinerarium syriacum Related people Philippe de Cabassoles Laura de Noves Ser Petracco Stefano Colonna Dionigi di Borgo San Sepolcro Francescuolo da Brossano Giovanni Boccaccio Dante Alighieri Robert, King of Naples Francesco Nelli Simone Martini Giovanni Colonna Lodewijk Heyligen Miscellaneous Petrarch's library Petrarchan sonnet Petrarch's and Shakespeare's sonnets Arquà Petrarca Influence of Italian humanism on Chaucer Palazzo Molina Petrarca-Preis award Authority control BIBSYS: 90089282 BNC: 000046972 BNE: XX886780 BNF: cb11919436b (data) CANTIC: a10452229 CiNii: DA02041632 GND: 118593234 HDS: 041573 ICCU: IT\ICCU\CFIV\017574 ISNI: 0000 0001 2128 7790 LCCN: n79092622 LNB: 000006994 MBA: a2109c59-5f37-4cab-8b7d-1927d586b36f NDL: 00472990 NKC: jn19990006495 NLA: 35419481 NLG: 273823 NLI: 000105066 NLK: KAC201729120 NLP: A11823938 NLR: [1] NSK: 000033192 NTA: 068380984 RERO: 02-A000129752 RKD: 337905 SELIBR: 206232 SNAC: w64850xt SUDOC: 027068935 Trove: 946186 ULAN: 500323951 VcBA: 495/15994 VIAF: 39382430 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n79092622 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Petrarch&oldid=994985582" Categories: Petrarch Italian Renaissance humanists Italian Renaissance writers 1304 births 1374 deaths Bibliophiles Book and manuscript collectors Christian humanists Italian male poets Italian Roman Catholics People from Arezzo Rhetoricians Roman Catholic writers Sonneteers 14th-century historians 14th-century Italian poets 14th-century Italian writers 14th-century Latin writers Hidden categories: CS1 Italian-language sources (it) Wikipedia articles needing clarification from May 2009 Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica with Wikisource reference CS1 maint: archived copy as title Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata Use mdy dates from April 2020 Articles needing additional references from April 2017 All articles needing additional references Pages with missing ISBNs Pages using Sister project links with hidden wikidata Articles with Project Gutenberg links Articles with Internet Archive links Articles with LibriVox links Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNC identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CANTIC identifiers Wikipedia articles with CINII identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with HDS identifiers Wikipedia articles with ICCU identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with LNB identifiers Wikipedia articles with MusicBrainz identifiers Wikipedia articles with NDL identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLG identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLI identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLP identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLR identifiers Wikipedia articles with NSK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with RERO identifiers Wikipedia articles with RKDartists identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SNAC-ID identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with Trove identifiers Wikipedia articles with ULAN identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers AC with 32 elements Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikiquote Wikisource Languages Afrikaans Alemannisch العربية Aragonés Asturianu Aymar aru Azərbaycanca تۆرکجه বাংলা Banjar Bân-lâm-gú Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ Български Bosanski Brezhoneg Буряад Català Чӑвашла Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français Frysk Furlan Gaeilge Galego 한국어 Հայերեն हिन्दी Hrvatski Ido Bahasa Indonesia Interlingua Íslenska Italiano עברית ქართული Қазақша Kiswahili Kurdî Latina Latviešu Lietuvių Ligure Limburgs Lumbaart Magyar Македонски Malagasy മലയാളം مصرى Bahasa Melayu Mìng-dĕ̤ng-ngṳ̄ Nederlands 日本語 Nordfriisk Norsk bokmål Norsk nynorsk Nouormand Occitan Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча ਪੰਜਾਬੀ پنجابی Picard Piemontèis Polski Português Română Runa Simi Русский Scots Shqip Sicilianu Simple English Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Sunda Suomi Svenska Tagalog ไทย Türkçe Українська اردو Vèneto Tiếng Việt West-Vlams Winaray 吴语 粵語 Zazaki 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 18 December 2020, at 16:06 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2093 ---- List of Roman dynasties - Wikipedia List of Roman dynasties From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search This is a list of the dynasties that ruled the Roman Empire and its two succeeding counterparts, the Western Roman Empire and the Byzantine Empire (Eastern Roman Empire). Dynasties of states that had claimed legal succession from the Roman Empire are not included in this list. Contents 1 List of Roman dynasties 2 Graphical representation 3 See also 4 Notes 5 References List of Roman dynasties[edit] Dynasty Period of rule Rulers[a] Start End Term First to rule Last to rule List / Family tree Dynasties of the Principate Julio–Claudian dynasty 27 BCE[1] 68 CE[1] 95 years Augustus Nero (list) (tree) Flavian dynasty 69 CE[1] 96 CE[1] 27 years Vespasian Domitian (list) (tree) Nerva–Antonine dynasty[b] 96 CE[2] 192 CE[2] 96 years Nerva Commodus (list) (tree) Severan dynasty 193 CE[3] 235 CE[3] 41 years[c] Septimius Severus Severus Alexander (list) (tree) Gordian dynasty 238 CE[4] 244 CE[4] 6 years Gordian I Gordian III (list) (tree) Decian dynasty 249 CE 251 CE 2 years Decius Hostilian (list) Valerian dynasty 253 CE 268 CE 15 years Valerian Gallienus (list) Caran dynasty 282 CE 285 CE 3 years Carus Carinus (list) Dynasties of the Dominate Constantinian dynasty[d] 305 CE[5] 363 CE[5] 58 years Constantius Chlorus (Western) Constantine I (Eastern) Julian (Western & Eastern) (list) (tree) Valentinianic dynasty 364 CE[6] 392 CE[6] 28 years Valentinian I (Western & Eastern) Valens (Eastern) Valentinian II (Western) (list) (tree) Theodosian dynasty 379 CE[7] 457 CE[7] 78 years Theodosius I (Western & Eastern) Valentinian III (Western) Marcian (Eastern) (list W) / (list E) (tree) Eastern (Byzantine) dynasties Leonid dynasty 457 CE[8] 518 CE[8] 61 years Leo I Anastasius I (list) (tree) Justinian dynasty 518 CE[9] 602 CE[9] 84 years Justin I Maurice and Theodosius[e] (list) (tree) Heraclian dynasty 610 CE[10] 711 CE[10] 91 years[f] Heraclius Justinian II and Tiberius[g] (list) (tree) Isaurian dynasty[h] 717 CE[11] 802 CE[11] 85 years Leo III Irene of Athens (list) (tree) Nikephorian dynasty 802 CE 813 CE 11 years Nikephoros I Michael I Rangabe and Theophylact[i] (list) (tree) Amorian dynasty[j] 820 CE[12] 867 CE[12] 47 years Michael II Michael III (list) (tree) Macedonian dynasty 867 CE[12] 1056 CE[12] 189 years Basil I Theodora Porphyrogenita (list) (tree) Komnenid dynasty[k] 1057 CE[13] 1185 CE[13] 106 years[l] Isaac I Komnenos Andronikos I Komnenos and John Komnenos[m] (list) (tree) Doukid dynasty 1059 CE[14] 1078 CE[14] 19 years Constantine X Doukas Michael VII Doukas (list) (tree) Angelid dynasty 1185 CE[15] 1204 CE[15] 19 years Isaac II Angelos Alexios V Doukas (list) (tree) Laskarid dynasty[n] 1204 CE 1261 CE 57 years Theodore I Laskaris John IV Laskaris (list) (tree) Palaiologan dynasty 1259 CE[16] 1453 CE[16] 194 years Michael VIII Palaiologos Constantine XI Palaiologos (list) (tree) Graphical representation[edit] See also[edit] History portal Monarchy portal Dynasty History of the Byzantine Empire History of the Roman Empire List of Byzantine emperors List of Byzantine usurpers List of condemned Roman emperors List of Roman emperors List of Roman usurpers Pax Romana Succession of the Roman Empire Notes[edit] ^ As adoption was widely practiced by the upper classes, some Roman monarchs were not directly biologically related to their predecessors despite belonging to the same dynasty. For example, the second emperor of the Julio–Claudian dynasty, Tiberius, was in fact an adopted son of the dynastic founder, Augustus. ^ The Nerva–Antonine dynasty is sometimes subdivided into the Nerva–Trajan dynasty and the Antonine dynasty. ^ The rule of the Severan dynasty was interrupted between 217 CE and 218 CE. Caracalla was the last ruler before the interregnum. Elagabalus was the first ruler after the interregnum. ^ The Constantinian dynasty is also known as the "Neo-Flavian dynasty". ^ Maurice and Theodosius reigned as co-rulers. ^ The rule of the Heraclian dynasty was interrupted between 695 CE and 705 CE. Justinian II was both the last ruler before the interregnum and the first ruler after the interregnum. ^ Justinian II and Tiberius reigned as co-rulers. ^ The Isaurian dynasty is also known as the "Syrian dynasty". ^ Michael I Rangabe and Theophylact reigned as co-rulers. ^ The Amorian dynasty is also known as the "Phrygian dynasty". ^ The Komnenid dynasty ruled the Empire of Trebizond between 1204 CE and 1461 CE. ^ The rule of the Komnenid dynasty was interrupted between 1059 CE and 1081 CE. Isaac I Komnenos was the last ruler before the interregnum. Alexios I Komnenos was the first ruler after the interregnum. ^ Andronikos I Komnenos and John Komnenos reigned as co-rulers. ^ The Laskarid dynasty of the Empire of Nicaea during the Fourth Crusade is considered as the legitimate continuation of the Roman Empire. References[edit] ^ a b c d Kidner, Frank; Bucur, Maria; Mathisen, Ralph; McKee, Sally; Weeks, Theodore (2013). Making Europe: The Story of the West. p. 161. ISBN 978-1111841317. ^ a b D'Amato, Raffaele; Frediani, Andrea (2019). Strasbourg AD 357: The victory that saved Gaul. p. 8. ISBN 9781472833969. ^ a b Ermatinger, James (2018). The Roman Empire: A Historical Encyclopedia. p. 233. ISBN 9781440838095. ^ a b Fomenko, Anatoly (2005). History: Fiction Or Science?. p. 171. ISBN 9782913621060. ^ a b Cowell, Frank (1961). Everyday Life in Ancient Rome. p. 199. ^ a b Christ, Karl (1984). The Romans: An Introduction to Their History and Civilisation. p. 184. ISBN 9780520045668. ^ a b Grig, Lucy; Kelly, Gavin (2015). Two Romes: Rome and Constantinople in Late Antiquity. p. 186. ISBN 9780190241087. ^ a b Maas, Michael (2015). The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Attila. p. 106. ISBN 9781107021754. ^ a b Konstam, Angus (2015). Byzantine Warship vs Arab Warship: 7th–11th centuries. p. 18. ISBN 9781472807588. ^ a b Flichy, Thomas (2012). Financial Crises and Renewal of Empires. p. 30. ISBN 9781291097337. ^ a b LePree, James; Djukic, Ljudmila (2019). The Byzantine Empire: A Historical Encyclopedia. p. 209. ISBN 9781440851476. ^ a b c d Tougher, Shaun (2009). The Eunuch in Byzantine History and Society. p. 55. ISBN 9781135235710. ^ a b Walker, Alicia (2012). The Emperor and the World: Exotic Elements and the Imaging of Middle Byzantine Imperial Power, Ninth to Thirteenth Centuries C.E. p. 11. ISBN 9781107004771. ^ a b Stacton, David (1965). The World on the Last Day: The Sack of Constantinople by the Turks, May 29, 1453: Its Causes and Consequences. p. 276. ^ a b LePree & Djukic (2019). p. 305. ^ a b Woodfin, Warren (2012). The Embodied Icon: Liturgical Vestments and Sacramental Power in Byzantium. p. xxv. ISBN 9780199592098. Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Roman_dynasties&oldid=992860527" Categories: Roman imperial dynasties Lists of dynasties Hidden categories: Pages using the EasyTimeline extension Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages فارسی 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 7 December 2020, at 14:16 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2109 ---- Caesar (title) - Wikipedia Caesar (title) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Imperial title of the Roman empire Not to be confused with the Roman politician Julius Caesar or William Shakespeare's play of the same name. Caesar Julius Caesar The name Caesar became very popular in Italy during the Roman Empire after Caesar's Civil War. Pronunciation English: /ˈsiːzər/ SEE-zər Classical Latin: [ˈkae̯sar] Gender Male Language(s) Latin Origin Meaning Emperor Region of origin Roman Empire Other names Variant form(s) ΚΑΙϹΑΡ Kaiser Tsar Popularity see popular names Ancient Rome This article is part of a series on the politics and government of ancient Rome Periods Roman Kingdom 753–509 BC Roman Republic 509–27 BC Roman Empire 27 BC – AD 395 Principate 27 BC – AD 284 Dominate AD 284–641 Western AD 395–476 Eastern AD 395–1453 Timeline Roman Constitution Constitution of the Kingdom Constitution of the Republic Constitution of the Empire Constitution of the Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Executive magistrates Precedent and law Roman law Ius Imperium Mos maiorum Collegiality Auctoritas Roman citizenship Cursus honorum Senatus consultum Senatus consultum ultimum Assemblies Centuriate Curiate Plebeian Tribal Ordinary magistrates Consul Praetor Quaestor Promagistrate Aedile Tribune Censor Governor Extraordinary magistrates Corrector Dictator Magister equitum Consular tribune Rex Triumviri Decemviri Titles and honours Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Praeses Praefectus Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Other countries v t e Caesar (Latin: [ˈkae̯.sar]English pl. Caesars; Latin pl. Caesares; in Greek: Καῖσᾰρ Kaîsar) is a title of imperial character. It derives from the cognomen of Julius Caesar, the Roman dictator. The change from being a familial name to a title adopted by the Roman Emperors can be dated to about 68/69 AD, the so-called "Year of the Four Emperors".[dubious – discuss] Contents 1 Etymology 2 Sole Roman Emperor 3 Dynastic title 4 Late Empire 4.1 Crisis of the Third Century 4.2 Tetrarchy 4.3 After the Tetrarchy 5 Byzantine Empire 6 Ottoman Empire 7 Legacy 7.1 Title (and name) 7.2 Historiography 8 List of holders 9 See also 10 References 11 Bibliography Etymology[edit] The meaning of the term is unknown and there are several theories. Julius himself, however, endorsed a meaning where it came from a Punic word meaning elephant. Sole Roman Emperor[edit] For political and personal reasons, Octavian chose to emphasize his relationship with Julius Caesar by styling himself simply "Imperator Caesar" (whereto the Roman Senate added the honorific Augustus, "Majestic" or "Venerable", in 27 BC), without any of the other elements of his full name. His successor as emperor, his stepson Tiberius, also bore the name as a matter of course; born Tiberius Claudius Nero, he was adopted by Caesar Augustus on 26 June 4 AD, as "Tiberius Julius Caesar". The precedent was set: the Emperor designated his successor by adopting him and giving him the name "Caesar". The fourth Emperor, Claudius, was the first to assume the name "Caesar" upon accession, without having been adopted by the previous emperor; however, he was at least a member by blood of the Julio-Claudian dynasty, being the maternal great-nephew of Augustus on his mother's side, the nephew of Tiberius, and the uncle of Caligula. Claudius in turn adopted his stepson and grand-nephew Lucius Domitius Ahenobarbus, giving him the name "Caesar" in the traditional way; his stepson would rule as the Emperor Nero. The first emperor to assume the position and the name simultaneously without any real claim to either was the usurper Servius Sulpicius Galba, who took the imperial throne under the name "Servius Galba Imperator Caesar" following the death of the last of the Julio-Claudians, Nero, in 68 AD. Galba helped solidify "Caesar" as the title of the designated heir by giving it to his own adopted heir, Lucius Calpurnius Piso Frugi Licinianus. Galba's reign did not last long and he was soon deposed by Marcus Otho. Otho did not at first use the title "Caesar" and occasionally used the title "Nero" as emperor, but later adopted the title "Caesar" as well. Otho was then defeated by Aulus Vitellius, who acceded with the name "Aulus Vitellius Germanicus Imperator Augustus". Vitellius did not adopt the cognomen "Caesar" as part of his name and may have intended to replace it with "Germanicus" (he bestowed the name "Germanicus" upon his own son that year). Nevertheless, Caesar had become such an integral part of the imperial dignity that its place was immediately restored by Titus Flavius Vespasianus ("Vespasian"), whose defeat of Vitellius in 69 AD put an end to the period of instability and began the Flavian dynasty. Vespasian's son, Titus Flavius Vespasianus became "Titus Flavius Caesar Vespasianus". Dynastic title[edit] By this point the status of "Caesar" had been regularised into that of a title given to the Emperor-designate (occasionally also with the honorific title Princeps Iuventutis, "Prince of Youth") and retained by him upon accession to the throne (e.g., Marcus Ulpius Traianus became Marcus Cocceius Nerva's designated heir as Caesar Nerva Traianus in October 97 and acceded on 28 January 98 as "Imperator Caesar Nerva Traianus Augustus"). After some variation among the earliest emperors, the style of the Emperor-designate on coins was usually Nobilissimus Caesar "Most Noble Caesar" (abbreviated to NOB CAES, N CAES etc.), though Caesar (CAES) on its own was also used. Late Empire[edit] Crisis of the Third Century[edit] The popularity of using the title Caesar to designate heirs-apparent increased throughout the third century. Many of the soldier emperors during the Crisis of the Third Century attempted to strengthen their legitimacy by naming heirs, including Maximinus Thrax, Philip the Arab, Decius, Trebonianus Gallus and Gallienus. Some of these were promoted to the rank of Augustus within their father's lifetime, for example Philippus II. The same title would also be used in the Gallic Empire, which operated autonomously from the rest of the Roman Empire from 260 to 274, with the final Gallic emperor Tetricus I appointing his heir Tetricus II Caesar and his consular colleague for 274. Despite the best efforts of these emperors, however, the granting of this title does not seem to have made succession in this chaotic period any more stable. Almost all Caesars would be killed before or alongside their fathers, or at best outlive them for a matter of months, as in the case of Hostilian. The sole Caesar to successfully obtain the rank of Augustus and rule for some time in his own right was Gordian III, and even he was heavily controlled by his court. Tetrarchy[edit] On 1 March 293, Diocletian established the Tetrarchy, a system of rule by two senior Emperors and two junior sub-Emperors. The two coequal senior emperors were styled identically to previous Emperors, as Imperator Caesar NN. Pius Felix Invictus Augustus (Elagabalus had introduced the use of Pius Felix, "the Pious and Blessed", while Maximinus Thrax introduced the use of Invictus, "the Unconquered") and were called the Augusti, while the two junior sub-Emperors were styled identically to previous Emperors-designate, as Nobilissimus Caesar. Likewise, the junior sub-Emperors retained the title "Caesar" upon accession to the senior position. The Tetrarchy was quickly abandoned as a system (though the four quarters of the empire survived as praetorian prefectures) in favour of two equal, territorial emperors, and the previous system of Emperors and Emperors-designate was restored, both in the Latin-speaking West and the Greek-speaking East. After the Tetrarchy[edit] The title of Caesar remained in use throughout the Constantinian period, with both Constantine I and his co-emperor and rival Licinius utilising it to mark their heirs. In the case of Constantine, this meant that by the time he died, he had four Caesars: Constantius II, Constantine II, Constans and his nephew Dalmatius, with his eldest son Crispus having been executed in mysterious circumstances earlier in his reign. In the event, Constantine would be succeeded only by his three sons, with Dalmatius dying in the summer of 337 in similarly murky circumstances. Constantius II himself would nominate as Caesars his two cousins Constantius Gallus and Julian in succession in the 350s, although he first executed Gallus and then found himself at war with Julian before his own death. After Julian's revolt of 361, the title Caesar fell out of imperial fashion for some time, with emperors preferring simply to elevate their sons directly to the post of Augustus, as with Gratian. It would be revived only nearly three quarters of a century later when Theodosius II used it to mark his nephew Valentinian III before successfully installing him upon the western throne vacated by the boy's other uncle Honorius. Thereafter it would receive limited use in the Eastern Roman Empire, for example, in the designation of the future Leo II in the final months of his grandfather's life. Byzantine Empire[edit] The Roman emperor Constantine the Great, mosaic in Hagia Sophia, Constantinople Caesar or Kaisar (Καῖσαρ) was a senior court title in the Byzantine Empire. Originally, as in the late Roman Empire, it was used for a subordinate co-emperor or the heir apparent, and was first among the "awarded" dignities. From the reign of Theodosius I, however, most emperors chose to solidify the succession of their intended heirs by raising them to co-emperors. Hence the title was more frequently awarded to second- and third-born sons, or to close and influential relatives of the Emperor: thus for example Alexios Mosele was the son-in-law of Theophilos (ruled 829–842), Bardas was the uncle and chief minister of Michael III (r. 842–867), while Nikephoros II (r. 963–969) awarded the title to his father, Bardas Phokas.[1][2] An exceptional case was the conferment of the dignity and its insignia to the Bulgarian khan Tervel by Justinian II (r. 685–695, 705–711) who had helped him regain his throne in 705.[2] The title was awarded to the brother of Empress Maria of Alania, George II of Georgia in 1081. The office enjoyed extensive privileges, great prestige and power. When Alexios I Komnenos created the title of sebastokrator, kaisar became third in importance, and fourth after Manuel I Komnenos created the title of despot, which it remained until the end of the Empire. The feminine form was kaisarissa. It remained an office of great importance, usually awarded to imperial relations, as well as a few high-ranking and distinguished officials, and only rarely awarded to foreigners. According to the Klētorologion of 899, the Byzantine Caesar's insignia were a crown without a cross, and the ceremony of a Caesar's creation (in this case dating to Constantine V), is included in De Ceremoniis I.43.[3] The title remained the highest in the imperial hierarchy until the introduction of the sebastokratōr (a composite derived from sebastos and autokrator, the Greek equivalents of Augustus and imperator) by Alexios I Komnenos (r. 1081–1118) and later of despotēs by Manuel I Komnenos (r. 1143–1180). The title remained in existence through the last centuries of the Empire. In the Palaiologan period, it was held by prominent nobles like Alexios Strategopoulos, but from the 14th century, it was mostly awarded to rulers of the Balkans such as the princes of Vlachia, Serbia and Thessaly.[2] Seal of the Caesar Michael Angelos In the late Byzantine hierarchy, as recorded in the mid-14th century Book of Offices of pseudo-Kodinos, the rank continued to come after the sebastokratōr. Pseudo-Kodinos further records that the Caesar was equal in precedence to the panhypersebastos, another creation of Alexios I, but that Emperor Michael VIII Palaiologos (r. 1259–1282) had raised his nephew Michael Tarchaneiotes to the rank of protovestiarios and decreed that to come after the Caesar; while under Andronikos II Palaiologos (r. 1282–1328) the megas domestikos was raised to the same eminence, when it was awarded to the future emperor John VI Kantakouzenos (r. 1347–1354).[4] According to pseudo-Kodinos, the Caesar's insignia under the Palaiologoi were a skiadion hat in red and gold, decorated with gold-wire embroideries, with a veil bearing the wearer's name and pendants identical to those of the despotēs and the sebastokratōr. He wore a red tunic (rouchon) similar to the emperor's (without certain decorations), and his shoes and stockings were blue, as were the accouterments of his horse; these were all identical to those of the sebastokratōr, but without the embroidered eagles of the latter. Pseudo-Kodinos writes that the particular forms of another form of hat, the domed skaranikon, and of the mantle, the tamparion, for the Caesar were not known.[5] Ottoman Empire[edit] Mehmed II and Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople Gennadios. "Caesar" is the title officially used by the Sasanid Persian to refer to the Roman and Byzantine emperors.[6][7] In the Middle East, the Persians and the Arabs continued to refer to the Roman and Byzantine emperors as "Caesar" (in Persian: قیصر روم‎ Qaysar-i Rum, "Caesar of the Romans", from Middle Persian kēsar). Thus, following the conquest of Constantinople in 1453, the victorious Ottoman sultan Mehmed II became the first of the rulers of the Ottoman Empire to assume the title (in Ottoman Turkish: قیصر روم‎ Kaysar-i Rûm). After the Fall of Constantinople, having conquered the Byzantine Empire, Mehmed took the title Kaysar-i Rûm, claiming succession to the Roman imperium.[8] His claim was that, by possession of the city, he was emperor, a new dynast by conquest, as had been done previously by the likes of Heraclius and Leo III.[9] Contemporary scholar George of Trebizond wrote "the seat of the Roman Empire is Constantinople ... and he who is and remains Emperor of the Romans is also the Emperor of the whole world".[10] Gennadius II, a staunch antagonist of the West because of the Sack of Constantinople committed by the Western Catholics and theological controversies between the two Churches, had been enthroned the Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople-New Rome with all the ceremonial elements and ethnarch (or milletbashi) status by the Sultan himself in 1454. In turn, Gennadius II formally recognized Mehmed as successor to the throne.[11] Mehmed also had a blood lineage to the Byzantine Imperial family; his predecessor, Sultan Orhan I had married a Byzantine princess, and Mehmed may have claimed descent from John Tzelepes Komnenos.[12] Ottoman sultans were not the only rulers to claim such a title, as there was the Holy Roman Empire in Western Europe, whose emperor, Frederick III, traced his titular lineage from Charlemagne who obtained the title of Roman Emperor when he was crowned by Pope Leo III in 800, although he was never recognized as such by the Byzantine Empire. In diplomatic writings between the Ottomans and Austrians, the Ottoman bureaucracy was angered by their use of the Caesar title when the Ottomans saw themself as the true successors of Rome. When war broke out and peace negotiations were done, the Austrians (Holy Roman Empire) agreed to give up the use of the Caesar title according to the Treaty of Konstantiniyye 1533 (though they would continue to use it and the Roman imperial title until the collapse of the Holy Roman Empire in 1806). The Russians who also claimed as the Third Rome were sanctioned by the Ottomans by giving orders to the Crimean Khanate to raid Russia numerous times.[13] The Ottomans would lose their political superiority to Holy Roman Empire in the Treaty of Sitvatorok in 1606 and to the Russians in the Treaty of Küçük Kaynarca in 1774. Legacy[edit] Title (and name)[edit] This section has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages) This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (May 2014) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) This section may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. The specific problem is: Pronunciation hints without IPA; Issues with templating, capitalization, spelling and punctuation Please help improve this section if you can. (May 2014) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) The history of "Caesar" as an imperial title is reflected by the following monarchic titles, usually reserved for "emperor" and "empress" in many languages (note that the name Caesar, pronounced /siːzər/ in English, was pronounced [kaisar] in Classical Latin): Afro-Asiatic languages: Arabic: Qays'r قصر;قيصر Qas'r Hebrew: Kesár‎ קיסר (male) and Kesarít קיסרית (female); Albanian: Albanian: Çezar and Qesarinë; Armenian: Armenian: կայսր Kaysr, and Armenian: կայսրություն Kaysrutiun meaning empire; Greek: Modern Greek: Greek: Καίσαρας (Kaisaras), the archaic form Greek: Καίσαρ is rarely used today; Austronesian languages: Bahasa Indonesia: Kaisar; Baltic languages: Latvian: Ķeizars and Ķeizariene; Germanic languages: Danish: Kejser and Kejserinde; Dutch: Keizer and Keizerin; German: Kaiser and Kaiserin; Icelandic: Keisari and Keisaraynja; Faroese: Keisari and Keisarinna; Norwegian: Keiser and Keiserinne (bokmål) / Keisar and Keisarinne (nynorsk); Swedish: Kejsare and Kejsarinna Old English: cāsere Indo-Iranian languages: Persian: Ghaysar‎ قيصر Urdu: Qaysar قيصر used in the title "Kaiser-i-Hind" ("Emperor of India") during the British Raj Kartvelian languages Georgian: კეისარი (Keisari) Romance languages Italian, Cesare, used as a first name. Romanian, cezar as a common noun in certain contexts; Cezar, used as a first name. Spanish, Portuguese and French, César: commonly used as first or second name. Slavic languages: Belarusian: Цар, царыца (transliterated as tsar, tsarytsa) Bulgarian: Цар, царица (transliterated as tsar, tsaritsa); Czech: Císař, císařovna; Macedonian: Цар, царица (transliterated as tsar, tsarica) Polish: Cesarz, Cesarzowa; Russian: Царь, Царица, (transliterated as tsar, tsaritsa); however in the Russian Empire (also reflected in some of its other languages), which aimed to be the "third Rome" as successor to the Byzantine Empire, it was abandoned (not in the foreign language renderings though) as imperial style—in favor of Imperator and Autocrator—and used as a lower, royal style as within the empire in chief of some of its parts, e.g. Georgia and Siberia In the United States and, more recently, Britain, the title "czar" (an archaic transliteration of the Russian title) is a slang term for certain high-level civil servants, such as the "drug czar" for the director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy and "terrorism czar" for a Presidential advisor on terrorism policy. More specifically, a czar refers to a sub-cabinet-level advisor within the executive branch of the U.S. government. Serbo-Croatian: Car, carica (цар, царица) Slovak: Cisár, cisárovná; Slovene: cesar, cesarica or car, carica; Ukrainian: Цісар, цісарева (tsisar, tsisareva), also Ukrainian: цар/царь, царина (archaic transliteration: czar and czarina), Tsar, tsaryna (modern transliteration) Turkic languages: Turkish: Kayser (historical), Sezar (modern). Kayser-i-Rûm "Caesar of [Constantinople, the second] Rome", one of many subsidiary titles proclaiming the Ottoman Sultan (main imperial title Padishah) as (Muslim) successor to "Rum" as the Turks called the (Christian) Roman Empire (as Byzantium had continued to call itself), continuing to use the name for part of formerly Byzantine territory (compare the Seljuk Rum-sultanate) Uralic languages: Estonian: Keiser and Keisrinna; Finnish: Keisari and Keisarinna or Keisaritar; Hungarian: Császár and Császárnő; In various Romance and other languages, the imperial title was based on the Latin Imperator (a military mandate or a victory title), but Caesar or a derivation is still used for both the name and the minor ranks (still perceived as Latin).[citation needed] There have been other cases of a noun proper being turned into a title, such as Charlemagne's Latin name, including the epithet, Carolus (magnus), becoming Slavonic titles rendered as King: Kralj (Serbo-Croatian), Král (Czech) and Król (Polish), etc.[citation needed] However certain languages, especially Romance languages, also commonly use a "modernized" word (e.g., César in French) for the name, both referring to the Roman cognomen and modern use as a first name, and even to render the title Caesar, sometimes again extended to the derived imperial titles above.[citation needed] Yoruba language: Yoruba: Késárì Translation of the name Caesar first recorded in the first book translated to Yoruba, the bible. The Caesar in the bible refers to Emperor Augustus, who was referred to as Caesar. It was not used as a title for kings as it did not reach the language till the late 19th century and was not widely known till the 20th century. The main title for king was "Kábíyèsi", meaning one who cannot be questioned (Ká-bí-yò-èsi). Historiography[edit] Oswald Spengler used the term, Caesarism, in his book, The Decline of the West. List of holders[edit] This list is incomplete; you can help by adding missing items with reliable sources. Titus (proclaimed caesar, 69 AD) (augustus 24 June 79–13 September 81) Domitian (proclaimed caesar, 69 AD) (augustus 14 September 81–18 September 96) Antoninus Pius (proclaimed caesar, 25 February 138 ) (augustus 10 July 138 – 7 March 161) Marcus Aurelius (proclaimed caesar, 5 December 139) (augustus 7 March 161 – 17 March 180) Lucius Verus (proclaimed caesar, 12 October 166) (augustus 7 March 161 – January/February 169) Commodus (proclaimed caesar, 12 October 166) (augustus 27 November 176 – 31 December 192) Caracalla (proclaimed caesar, 195/6) (augustus 4 February 211 – 8 April 217) Geta (proclaimed caesar, 28 January 198) (augustus 4 February 211 – 2 February 212) Diadumenian (proclaimed caesar, April 217) (augustus May – June 218) Gordian III (proclaimed caesar, April 238) (augustus early August 238 – late January/early February 244) Volusianus (proclaimed caesar, June? 251) (augustus late June/early August 251 – late July/early August 253) Maximian (proclaimed caesar, 21 July 285 ) (augustus 1 April 286 – 1 May 305; end 306/early 307 – November 308) Constantius I (proclaimed caesar, 1 March 293) (augustus 1 May 305 – 25 July 306) Galerius (proclaimed caesar, 21 March 293) (augustus 1 May 305 – early May 311) Valerius Severus (proclaimed caesar, 1 May 305) (augustus 25 July 306 – April 307) Maximinus Daia (proclaimed caesar, 1 May 305) (augustus 1 May 310 – summer 313) Maxentius (proclaimed caesar, 28 October 306) (augustus Apr? 307 – 28 October 312) Constantine the Great (proclaimed caesar, 25 July 306) (augustus 25 July 306 – 22 May 337) Crispus (proclaimed caesar, 1 March 317) Licinius II (proclaimed caesar, 1 March 317) Constantine II (proclaimed caesar, 1 March 317) (augustus 9 Sep. 337 – early April 340) Constans (proclaimed caesar, 25 December 333) (augustus 9 Sep. 337 – 18 January 350) Constantius II (proclaimed caesar, 8 November 324) (augustus 9 Sep. 337 – 3 November 361) Constantius Gallus Julian (proclaimed caesar, 6 November 355) (augustus 3 November 361 – 26/7 June 363) Valentinian III (proclaimed caesar, 23 October 424) (augustus 23 October 425 – 16 March 455) Majorian (proclaimed caesar, 1 April 457) (augustus 28 December 457 – 2 August 461) Procopius Anthemius (proclaimed caesar, 25 March 467) (augustus 12 April 467 – 11 July 472) Leo II (proclaimed caesar, October 473) (augustus January – November 474) Byzantine Tervel, khan of the Bulgars, named in 705 by Justinian II (r. 685–695, 705–711). Theophobos, named by Theophilos (r. 829–842).[14] Alexios Mosele, named by Theophilos (r. 829–842). Bardas, named by his nephew Michael III (r. 842–867). Bardas Phokas, named by his son Nikephoros II (r. 963–969). John Doukas, named in 1059 by his brother Constantine X Doukas. Nikephoros Bryennios, named by his father-in-law Alexios I Komnenos Isaac Komnenos, named by his father Alexios I Komnenos (according to Ioannes Zonaras) George II of Georgia, brother of Empress Maria of Alania, in 1081. John Rogerios Dalassenos, named by John II Komnenos. Alexios Strategopoulos, named by Michael VIII Palaiologos (r. 1261–1282). Roger de Flor, leader of the Catalan Grand Company, named in 1304 by Andronikos II Palaiologos. Hrelja, likely named by John VI Kantakouzenos. Serbian Grgur Golubić, named in 1347 by Stefan Dušan. Vojihna, named in 1347 by Stefan Dušan. Preljub, named in 1348–49 by Stefan Dušan. Uglješa Vlatković, named by Uroš V. Nikola Radonja, named by Uroš V. Novak, named by Uroš V. See also[edit] Augustus (honorific) Caesaropapism Khosrow (word) References[edit] ^ Bury 1911, p. 36. sfn error: no target: CITEREFBury1911 (help) ^ a b c ODB, "Caesar" (A. Kazhdan), p. 363. ^ Bury 1911, pp. 20, 36. sfn error: no target: CITEREFBury1911 (help) ^ Verpeaux 1966, pp. 134–136. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFVerpeaux1966 (help) ^ Verpeaux 1966, pp. 147–149. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFVerpeaux1966 (help) ^ Middle Persian: 𐭪𐭩𐭮𐭫𐭩‎ kysly (Inscriptional Pahlavi), kysl (Book Pahlavi), transcribed as kēsar ^ Hurbanič, Martin (2019). The Avar Siege of Constantinople in 626: History and Legend. Springer. p. 234. ISBN 978-3-030-16684-7. ^ Michalis N. Michael; Matthias Kappler; Eftihios Gavriel (2009). Archivum Ottomanicum. Mouton. p. 10. ^ Christine Isom-Verhaaren; Kent F. Schull (11 April 2016). Living in the Ottoman Realm: Empire and Identity, 13th to 20th Centuries. Indiana University Press. pp. 38–. ISBN 978-0-253-01948-6. ^ Roger Crowley (2009). Constantinople: The Last Great Siege, 1453. Faber & Faber. pp. 13–. ISBN 978-0-571-25079-0. ^ "Gennadios II Scholarios". Encyclopaedia Britannica. Retrieved 13 July 2020. ^ Norwich, John Julius (1995). Byzantium:The Decline and Fall. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. pp. 81–82. ISBN 0-679-41650-1. ^ Halil, Inançik (2017). Kırım Hanlığı Tarihi Üzerine Araştırmalar 1441-1700: Seçme Eserleri - XI. ISBN 978-6052952511. ^ Juan Signes Codoñer (23 March 2016). The Emperor Theophilos and the East, 829–842: Court and Frontier in Byzantium During the Last Phase of Iconoclasm. Routledge. pp. 121–. ISBN 978-1-317-03427-8. Bibliography[edit] Pauly-Wissowa – Realencyclopädie der Classischen Altertumswissenschaft Bury, J. B. (1911). The Imperial Administrative System of the Ninth Century - With a Revised Text of the Kletorologion of Philotheos. London: Oxford University Press. OCLC 1046639111. Kazhdan, Alexander, ed. (1991). The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-504652-8. Verpeaux, Jean, ed. (1966). Pseudo-Kodinos, Traité des Offices (in French). Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. Ferjančić, Božidar (1970). "Севастократори и кесари у Српском царству" [Sebastocrators and Caesares in the Serbian Empire]. Зборник Филозофског факултета. Belgrade: 255–269. Kazhdan, Alexander, ed. (1991). The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-504652-8. Verpeaux, Jean, ed. (1966). Pseudo-Kodinos, Traité des Offices (in French). Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films v t e Order of Byzantine palace offices (after pseudo-Kodinos) Despotes Sebastokrator Caesar Megas domestikos Panhypersebastos Protovestiarios Megas doux Protostrator Megas logothetes Megas stratopedarches Megas primmikerios Megas konostaulos Protosebastos Pinkernes Kouropalates Parakoimomenos tes sphendones Parakoimomenos tou koitonos Logothetes tou genikou Protovestiarites Domestikos tes trapezes Epi tes trapezes Megas papias Eparchos Megas droungarios tes vigles Megas hetaireiarches Megas chartoullarios Logothetes tou dromou Protasekretis Epi tou stratou Mystikos Domestikos ton scholon Megas droungarios tou stolou Primmikerios tes aules Protospatharios Megas archon Tatas tes aules Megas tzaousios Praitor tou demou Logothetes ton oikeiakon Megas logariastes Protokynegos Skouterios Ameralios Epi ton deeseon Koiaistor Megas adnoumiastes Logothetes tou stratiotikou Protoierakarios Logothetes ton agelon Megas diermeneutes Akolouthos Krites tou phossatou Archon tou allagiou Protallagator Megas dioiketes Orphanotrophos Protonotarios Epi ton anamneseon Domestikos ton teicheon Prokathemenos of the koiton Prokathemenos of the vestiarion Vestiariou Hetaireiarches Logariastes tes aules Stratopedarches of the monokaballoi Stratopedarches of the tzangratores Stratopedarches of the mourtatoi Stratopedarches of the Tzakones Prokathemenos of the Great Palace Prokathemenos of the Palace of Blachernae Domestikos of the themata Domestikos of the eastern themata Domestikos of the western themata Megas myrtaïtes Protokomes Papias Droungarios Sebastos Myrtaïtes Prokathemenoi of the cities according to their importance (unknown rank) Epi tou kanikleiou (unknown rank) Megas baïoulos Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Caesar_(title)&oldid=996766966" Categories: Ancient Roman titles Titles of national or ethnic leadership Byzantine court titles Caesares Imperial titles Hidden categories: Harv and Sfn no-target errors Harv and Sfn multiple-target errors Articles containing Middle Persian-language text Articles with short description Short description matches Wikidata Use dmy dates from July 2020 Pages using infobox name with unknown parameters Articles containing Ancient Greek (to 1453)-language text All accuracy disputes Articles with disputed statements from March 2018 Articles containing Persian-language text Articles containing Ottoman Turkish (1500-1928)-language text Articles needing additional references from May 2014 All articles needing additional references Articles needing cleanup from May 2014 All pages needing cleanup Cleanup tagged articles with a reason field from May 2014 Wikipedia pages needing cleanup from May 2014 Articles with multiple maintenance issues Articles containing Hebrew-language text Articles containing Albanian-language text Articles containing Armenian-language text Articles containing Greek-language text Articles containing Latvian-language text Articles containing Danish-language text Articles containing Dutch-language text Articles containing German-language text Articles containing Icelandic-language text Articles containing Faroese-language text Articles containing Norwegian-language text Articles containing Swedish-language text Articles containing Belarusian-language text Articles containing Bulgarian-language text Articles containing Czech-language text Articles containing Macedonian-language text Articles containing Polish-language text Articles containing Russian-language text Articles containing Serbo-Croatian-language text Articles containing Slovak-language text Articles containing Ukrainian-language text Articles containing Turkish-language text Articles containing Estonian-language text Articles containing Finnish-language text Articles containing Hungarian-language text All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from February 2019 Articles containing Yoruba-language text Incomplete lists from January 2019 CS1 French-language sources (fr) Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Alemannisch العربية Azərbaycanca Беларуская Български Brezhoneg Català Cebuano Čeština Dansk Deutsch Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français Frysk 客家語/Hak-kâ-ngî 한국어 Bahasa Indonesia Interlingua Italiano Қазақша Latina Magyar Македонски മലയാളം Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Norsk nynorsk Occitan Piemontèis Polski Português Română Русский Slovenščina Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska தமிழ் Türkçe Українська اردو Tiếng Việt 粵語 Zazaki 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 28 December 2020, at 14:24 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2133 ---- Medieval Latin - Wikipedia Medieval Latin From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Form of Latin used in the Middle Ages This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Medieval Latin" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (May 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) Medieval Latin LINGVA LATINA lingua latina Lingua Latina Carmina Cantabrigiensia, Medieval Latin manuscript Native to Numerous small states Region Most of Europe Era Developed from Late Latin between 4th and 10th centuries; replaced by Renaissance Latin from the 14th century Language family Indo-European Italic Latino-Faliscan Latin Medieval Latin Early forms Old Latin Classical Latin Late Latin Writing system Latin alphabet  Official status Official language in De facto in most Catholic and/or Romance-speaking states during the Middle Ages Language codes ISO 639-3 – Linguist List lat-med Glottolog medi1250 Europe, AD 1000 Medieval Latin was the form of Latin used in Roman Catholic Western Europe during the Middle Ages. In this region it served as the primary written language, though local languages were also written to varying degrees. Latin functioned as the main medium of scholarly exchange, as the liturgical language of the Church, and as the working language of science, literature, law, and administration. Medieval Latin represented a continuation of Classical Latin and Late Latin, with enhancements for new concepts as well as for the increasing integration of Christianity. Despite some meaningful differences from Classical Latin, Medieval writers did not regard it as a fundamentally different language. There is no real consensus on the exact boundary where Late Latin ends and Medieval Latin begins. Some scholarly surveys begin with the rise of early Ecclesiastical Latin in the middle of the 4th century, others around 500,[1] and still others with the replacement of written Late Latin by written Romance languages starting around the year 900. The terms Medieval Latin and Ecclesiastical Latin are often used synonymously, though some scholars draw distinctions. Ecclesiastical Latin refers specifically to the form that has been used by the Roman Catholic Church, whereas Medieval Latin refers more broadly to all of the (written) forms of Latin used in the Middle Ages. The Romance languages spoken in the Middle Ages were often referred to as Latin, since the Romance languages were all descended from Vulgar Latin itself.[2] Contents 1 Influences 1.1 Christian Latin 1.2 Vulgar Latin 2 Changes in vocabulary, syntax, and grammar 2.1 Syntax 3 Orthography 4 Medieval Latin literature 5 Medieval Latin and everyday life 6 Important medieval Latin authors 6.1 4th–5th centuries 6.2 6th–8th centuries 6.3 9th century 6.4 10th century 6.5 11th century 6.6 12th century 6.7 13th century 6.8 14th century 7 Literary movements 8 Works 9 References 9.1 Citations 9.2 Sources 10 Further reading 11 External links Influences[edit] Christian Latin[edit] Medieval Latin had an enlarged vocabulary, which freely borrowed from other sources. It was heavily influenced by the language of the Vulgate, which contained many peculiarities alien to Classical Latin that resulted from a more or less direct translation from Greek and Hebrew; the peculiarities mirrored the original not only in its vocabulary but also in its grammar and syntax. Greek provided much of the technical vocabulary of Christianity. The various Germanic languages spoken by the Germanic tribes, who invaded southern Europe, were also major sources of new words. Germanic leaders became the rulers of parts of the Roman Empire that they conquered, and words from their languages were freely imported into the vocabulary of law. Other more ordinary words were replaced by coinages from Vulgar Latin or Germanic sources because the classical words had fallen into disuse. An illuminated manuscript of a Book of Hours contains prayers in medieval Latin. Latin was also spread to areas such as Ireland and Germany, where Romance languages were not spoken, and which had never known Roman rule. Works written in those lands where Latin was a learned language, having no relation to the local vernacular, also influenced the vocabulary and syntax of medieval Latin. Since subjects like science and philosophy, including Argumentation theory and Ethics (pre-law), were communicated in Latin, the Latin vocabulary that developed for them became the source of a great many technical words in modern languages. English words like abstract, subject, communicate, matter, probable and their cognates in other European languages generally have the meanings given to them in medieval Latin.[3] Vulgar Latin[edit] The influence of Vulgar Latin was also apparent in the syntax of some medieval Latin writers, although Classical Latin continued to be held in high esteem and studied as models for literary compositions. The high point of the development of medieval Latin as a literary language came with the Carolingian renaissance, a rebirth of learning kindled under the patronage of Charlemagne, king of the Franks. Alcuin was Charlemagne's Latin secretary and an important writer in his own right; his influence led to a rebirth of Latin literature and learning after the depressed period following the final disintegration of the authority of the Western Roman Empire. Although it was simultaneously developing into the Romance languages, Latin itself remained very conservative, as it was no longer a native language and there were many ancient and medieval grammar books to give one standard form. On the other hand, strictly speaking there was no single form of "medieval Latin". Every Latin author in the medieval period spoke Latin as a second language, with varying degrees of fluency and syntax. Grammar and vocabulary, however, were often influenced by an author's native language. This was especially true beginning around the 12th century, after which the language became increasingly adulterated: late medieval Latin documents written by French speakers tend to show similarities to medieval French grammar and vocabulary; those written by Germans tend to show similarities to German, etc. For instance, rather than following the classical Latin practice of generally placing the verb at the end, medieval writers would often follow the conventions of their own native language instead. Whereas Latin had no definite or indefinite articles, medieval writers sometimes used forms of unus as an indefinite article, and forms of ille (reflecting usage in the Romance languages) as a definite article or even quidam (meaning "a certain one/thing" in Classical Latin) as something like an article. Unlike classical Latin, where esse ("to be") was the only auxiliary verb, medieval Latin writers might use habere ("to have") as an auxiliary, similar to constructions in Germanic and Romance languages. The accusative and infinitive construction in classical Latin was often replaced by a subordinate clause introduced by quod or quia. This is almost identical, for example, to the use of que in similar constructions in French. In every age from the late 8th century onwards, there were learned writers (especially within the Church) who were familiar enough with classical syntax to be aware that these forms and usages were "wrong" and resisted their use. Thus the Latin of a theologian like St Thomas Aquinas or of an erudite clerical historian such as William of Tyre tends to avoid most of the characteristics described above, showing its period in vocabulary and spelling alone; the features listed are much more prominent in the language of lawyers (e.g. the 11th-century English Domesday Book), physicians, technical writers and secular chroniclers. However the use of quod to introduce subordinate clauses was especially pervasive and is found at all levels.[4] Changes in vocabulary, syntax, and grammar[edit] Medieval Latin had ceased to be a living language and was instead a scholarly language of the minority of educated men in medieval Europe, used in official documents more than for everyday communication. This resulted in two major features of Medieval Latin compared with Classical Latin, though when it is compared to the other vernacular languages, Medieval Latin developed very few changes.[4] There are many prose constructions written by authors of this period that can be considered "showing off" a knowledge of Classical or Old Latin by the use of rare or archaic forms and sequences. Though they had not existed together historically, it is common that an author would use grammatical ideas of the two periods Republican and archaic, placing them equally in the same sentence. As well, many undistinguished scholars had limited educations of "proper" Latin, or had been influenced in their writings by Vulgar Latin. Word order usually tended towards that of the vernacular language of the author, not the artificial and polished word order of Classical Latin. Conversely, an erudite scholar might attempt to "show off" by intentionally constructing a very complicated sentence. Because Latin is an inflected language, it is technically possible to place related words at opposite ends of a paragraph-long sentence, and owing to the complexity of doing so, it was seen by some as a sign of great skill. Typically, prepositions are used much more frequently (as in modern Romance languages) for greater clarity, instead of using the ablative case alone. Further, in Classical Latin the subject of a verb was often left implied, unless it was being stressed: videt = "he sees". For clarity, Medieval Latin more frequently includes an explicit subject: is videt = "he sees" without necessarily stressing the subject. Various changes occurred in vocabulary, and certain words were mixed into different declensions or conjugations. Many new compound verbs were formed. Some words retained their original structure but drastically changed in meaning: animositas specifically means "wrath" in Medieval Latin while in Classical Latin, it generally referred to "high spirits, excited spirits" of any kind. Owing to heavy use of biblical terms, there was a large influx of new words borrowed from Greek and Hebrew and even some grammatical influences. That obviously largely occurred among priests and scholars, not the laity. In general, it is difficult to express abstract concepts in Latin, as many scholars admitted. For example, Plato's abstract concept of "the Truth" had to be expressed in Latin as "what is always true". Medieval scholars and theologians, translating both the Bible and Greek philosophers into Latin out of the Koine and Classical Greek, cobbled together many new abstract concept words in Latin. Syntax[edit] Indirect discourse, which in Classical Latin was achieved by using a subject accusative and infinitive, was now often simply replaced by new conjunctions serving the function of English "that" such as quod, quia, or quoniam. There was a high level of overlap between the old and new constructions, even within the same author's work, and it was often a matter of preference. A particularly famous and often cited example is from the Venerable Bede, using both constructions within the same sentence: "Dico me scire et quod sum ignobilis" = "I say that I know [accusative and infinitive] and that I am unknown [new construction]". The resulting subordinate clause often used the subjunctive mood instead of the indicative. This new syntax for indirect discourse is among the most prominent features of Medieval Latin, the largest syntactical change. Several substitutions were often used instead of subjunctive clause constructions. They did not break the rules of Classical Latin but were an alternative way to express the same meaning, avoiding the use of a subjunctive clause. The present participle was frequently used adverbially in place of qui or cum clauses, such as clauses of time, cause, concession, and purpose. That was loosely similar to the use of the present participle in an ablative absolute phrase, but the participle did not need to be in the ablative case. Habeo (I have [to]) and "Debeo" (I must) would be used to express obligation more often than the gerundive. Given that obligation inherently carries a sense of futurity ("Carthage must be destroyed" at some point in the future), it anticipates how the Romance languages such as French would use "habeo" as the basis for their future tenses (abandoning the Latin forms of the future tense). While in Latin "amare habeo" is the indirect discourse "I have to love", in the French equivalent,"aimerai" (habeo > ayyo > ai, aimer+ai), it has become the future tense, "I shall love", losing the sense of obligation. In Medieval Latin, however, it was still indirect discourse and not yet used as simply a future tense. Instead of a clause introduced by ut or ne, an infinitive was often used with a verb of hoping, fearing, promising, etc. Conversely, some authors might haphazardly switch between the subjunctive and indicative forms of verbs, with no intended difference in meaning. The usage of sum changed significantly: it was frequently omitted or implied. Further, many medieval authors did not feel that it made sense for the perfect passive construction "laudatus sum" to use the present tense of esse in a past tense construction so they began using fui, the past perfect of sum, interchangeably with sum. Chaos in the usage of demonstrative pronouns. Hic, ille, iste, and even the intensive ipse are often used virtually interchangeably. In anticipation of Romance languages, hic and ille were also frequently used simply to express the definite article "the", which Classical Latin did not possess. Unus was also used for the indefinite article "a, an". Use of reflexives became much looser. A reflexive pronoun in a subordinate clause might refer to the subject of the main clause. The reflexive possessive suus might be used in place of a possessive genitive such as eius. Comparison of adjectives changed somewhat. The comparative form was sometimes used with positive or superlative meaning. Also, the adverb "magis" was often used with a positive adjective to indicate a comparative meaning,and multum and nimis could be used with a positive form of adjective to give a superlative meaning. Classical Latin used the ablative absolute, but as stated above, in Medieval Latin examples of nominative absolute or accusative absolute may be found. This was a point of difference between the ecclesiastical Latin of the clergy and the "Vulgar Latin" of the laity, which existed alongside it. The educated clergy mostly knew that traditional Latin did not use the nominative or accusative case in such constructions, but only the ablative case. These constructions are observed in the medieval era, but they are changes that developed among the uneducated commoners. Classical Latin does not distinguish progressive action in the present tense, thus laudo can mean either "I praise" or "I am praising". In imitation of Greek, Medieval Latin could use a present participle with sum to form a periphrastic tense equivalent to the English progressive. This "Greek Periphrastic Tense" formation could also be done in the past and future tenses: laudans sum ("I am praising"), laudans eram ("I was praising"), laudans ero ("I shall be praising"). Classical Latin verbs had at most two voices, active and passive, but Greek (the original language of the New Testament) had an additional "middle voice" (or reflexive voice). One use was to express when the subject is acting upon itself: "Achilles put the armor onto himself" or "Jesus clothed himself in the robe" would use the middle voice. Because Latin had no middle voice, Medieval Latin expresses such sentences by putting the verb in the passive voice form, but the conceptual meaning is active (similar to Latin deponent verbs). For example, the Medieval Latin translation of Genesis states literally, "the Spirit of God was moved over the waters" ("spiritus Dei ferebatur super aquas", Genesis 1:2), but it is just expressing a Greek middle-voice verb: "God moved [himself] over the waters". Overlapping with orthography differences (see below), certain diphthongs were sometimes shortened: "oe" to "e", and "ae" to "e". Thus, "oecumenicus" becomes the more familiar "ecumenicus" (more familiar in this later form because religious terms such as "ecumenical" were more common in medieval Latin). The "oe" diphthong is not particularly frequent in Latin, but the shift from "ae" to "e" affects many common words, such as "caelum" (heaven) being shortened to "celum"; even "puellae" (girls) was shortened to "puelle". Often, a town would lose its name to that of the tribe which was either accusative or ablative plural; two forms that were then used for all cases, or in other words, considered "indeclinable".[5][clarification needed] Orthography[edit] The Prüfening dedicatory inscription from Bavaria, dated to 1119, composed in medieval Latin. It was printed rather than carved. Many striking differences between classical and medieval Latin are found in orthography. Perhaps the most striking difference is that medieval manuscripts used a wide range of abbreviations by means of superscripts, special characters etc.: for instance the letters "n" and "s" were often omitted and replaced by a diacritical mark above the preceding or following letter. Apart from this, some of the most frequently occurring differences are as follows. Clearly many of these would have been influenced by the spelling, and indeed pronunciation,[5] of the vernacular language, and thus varied between different European countries. Following the Carolingian reforms of the 9th century, Carolingian minuscule was widely adopted, leading to a clear differentiation between capital and lowercase letters. A partial or full differentiation between v and u, and between j and i. The diphthong ae is usually collapsed and simply written as e (or e caudata, ę); for example, puellae might be written puelle (or puellę). The same happens with the diphthong oe, for example in pena, Edipus, from poena, Oedipus. This feature is already found on coin inscriptions of the 4th century (e.g. reipublice for reipublicae). Conversely, an original e in Classical Latin was often represented by ae or oe (e.g. aecclesia and coena), also reflected in English spellings such as foetus. Because of a severe decline in the knowledge of Greek, in loanwords and foreign names from or transmitted through Greek, y and i might be used more or less interchangeably: Ysidorus, Egiptus, from Isidorus, Aegyptus. This is also found in pure Latin words: ocius ("more swiftly") appears as ocyus and silva as sylva, this last being a form which survived into the 18th century and so became embedded in modern botanical Latin (also cf. Pennsylvania). h might be lost, so that habere becomes abere, or mihi becomes mi (the latter also occurred in Classical Latin); or mihi may be written michi, indicating that the h had come to be pronounced as k or perhaps kh. This pronunciation is not found in Classical Latin. The loss of h in pronunciation also led to the addition of h in writing where it did not previously belong, especially in the vicinity of r, such as chorona for corona, a tendency also sometimes seen in Classical Latin. -ti- before a vowel is often written as -ci- [tsi], so that divitiae becomes diviciae (or divicie), tertius becomes tercius, vitium vicium. The combination mn might have another plosive inserted, so that alumnus becomes alumpnus, somnus sompnus. Single consonants were often doubled, or vice versa, so that tranquillitas becomes tranquilitas and Africa becomes Affrica. Syncopation became more frequent: vi, especially in verbs in the perfect tense, might be lost, so that novisse becomes nosse (this occurred in Classical Latin as well but was much more frequent in medieval Latin). These orthographical differences were often due to changes in pronunciation or, as in the previous example, morphology, which authors reflected in their writing. By the 16th century, Erasmus complained that speakers from different countries were unable to understand each other's form of Latin.[6] The gradual changes in Latin did not escape the notice of contemporaries. Petrarch, writing in the 14th century, complained about this linguistic "decline", which helped fuel his general dissatisfaction with his own era. Medieval Latin literature[edit] The corpus of medieval Latin literature encompasses a wide range of texts, including such diverse works as sermons, hymns, hagiographical texts, travel literature, histories, epics, and lyric poetry. The first half of the 5th century saw the literary activities of the great Christian authors Jerome (c. 347–420) and Augustine of Hippo (354–430), whose texts had an enormous influence on theological thought of the Middle Ages, and of the latter's disciple Prosper of Aquitaine (c. 390-455). Of the later 5th century and early 6th century, Sidonius Apollinaris (c. 430 – after 489) and Ennodius (474–521), both from Gaul, are well known for their poems, as is Venantius Fortunatus (c. 530–600). This was also a period of transmission: the Roman patrician Boethius (c. 480–524) translated part of Aristotle's logical corpus, thus preserving it for the Latin West, and wrote the influential literary and philosophical treatise De consolatione Philosophiae; Cassiodorus (c. 485–585) founded an important library at the monastery of Vivarium near Squillace where many texts from Antiquity were to be preserved. Isidore of Seville (c. 560-636) collected all scientific knowledge still available in his time into what might be called the first encyclopedia, the Etymologiae. Gregory of Tours (c. 538–594) wrote a lengthy history of the Frankish kings. Gregory came from a Gallo-Roman aristocratic family, and his Latin, which shows many aberrations from the classical forms, testifies to the declining significance of classical education in Gaul. At the same time, good knowledge of Latin and even of Greek was being preserved in monastic culture in Ireland and was brought to England and the European mainland by missionaries in the course of the 6th and 7th centuries, such as Columbanus (543–615), who founded the monastery of Bobbio in Northern Italy. Ireland was also the birthplace of a strange poetic style known as Hisperic Latin. Other important Insular authors include the historian Gildas (c. 500–570) and the poet Aldhelm (c. 640–709). Benedict Biscop (c. 628–690) founded the monastery of Wearmouth-Jarrow and furnished it with books which he had taken home from a journey to Rome and which were later used by Bede (c. 672–735) to write his Ecclesiastical History of the English People. Many medieval Latin works have been published in the series Patrologia Latina, Corpus Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum Latinorum and Corpus Christianorum. Medieval Latin and everyday life[edit] Medieval Latin was separated from Classical Latin around 800 and at this time was no longer considered part of the everyday language. Spoken Latin became a practice used mostly by the educated high class population. Even then it was not frequently used in casual conversation. An example of these men includes the churchmen who could read Latin, but could not effectively speak it. Latin's use in universities was structured in lectures and debates, however, it was highly recommended that students use it in conversation. This practice was kept up only due to rules.[4] One of Latin's purposes, writing, was still in practice; the main uses being charters for property transactions and to keep track of the pleadings given in court. Even then, those of the church still used Latin more than the rest of the population. At this time, Latin served little purpose to the regular population but was still used regularly in ecclesiastical culture.[4] Important medieval Latin authors[edit] 4th–5th centuries[edit] Aetheria (fl. 385) Jerome (c. 347–420) Augustine (354-430) 6th–8th centuries[edit] Boëthius (c. 480 – 525) Cassiodorus (c. 485 – c. 585) Gildas (d. c. 570) Flavius Cresconius Corippus (d. c. 570) Venantius Fortunatus (c. 530 – c. 600) Gregory of Tours (c. 538–594) Pope Gregory I (c. 540 – 604) Isidore of Seville (c. 560–636) Bede (c. 672–735) St. Boniface (c. 672 - 754) Chrodegang of Metz (d. 766) Paul the Deacon (720s - c.799) Beatus of Liébana (c. 730 - 800) Peter of Pisa (d. 799) Paulinus of Aquileia (730s - 802) Alcuin (c. 735–804) 9th century[edit] Einhard (775-840) Rabanus Maurus (780-856) Paschasius Radbertus (790-865) Rudolf of Fulda (d. 865) Dhuoda Lupus of Ferrieres (805-862) Andreas Agnellus (Agnellus of Ravenna) (c. 805-846?) Hincmar (806-882) Walafrid Strabo (808-849) Florus of Lyon (d. 860?) Gottschalk (theologian) (808-867) Sedulius Scottus (fl. 840-860) Anastasius Bibliothecarius (810-878) Johannes Scotus Eriugena (815-877) Asser (d. 909) Notker Balbulus (840-912) 10th century[edit] Ratherius (890–974) Hrotsvitha of Gandersheim (935-973) Thietmar of Merseburg (975–1018) 11th century[edit] Marianus Scotus (1028–1082) Adam of Bremen (fl. 1060–1080) Anselm of Canterbury (1033/4-1109) Marbodius of Rennes (c. 1035-1123) 12th century[edit] Pierre Abélard (1079–1142) Suger of St Denis (c. 1081–1151) Geoffrey of Monmouth (c. 1100 – c. 1155) Ailred of Rievaulx (1110–1167) Otto of Freising (c. 1114–1158) Archpoet (c. 1130 - c. 1165) William of Tyre (c. 1130-1185) Peter of Blois (c. 1135 – c. 1203) Walter of Châtillon (fl. c. 1200) Adam of St. Victor 13th century[edit] Giraldus Cambrensis (c. 1146 – c. 1223) Saxo Grammaticus (c. 1150 – c. 1220) Anonymous (fl. late 12th century – early 13th century) Thomas of Celano (c. 1200 – c. 1265) Albertus Magnus (c. 1200–1280) Roger Bacon (c. 1214–1294) St Thomas Aquinas (c. 1225–1274) Ramon Llull (1232–1315) Siger of Brabant (c. 1240–1280s) Duns Scotus (c. 1266–1308) 14th century[edit] See also: Renaissance Latin Ranulf Higdon (c. 1280 - c. 1363) William of Ockham (c. 1288 - c. 1347) Jean Buridan (1300 – 1358) Henry Suso (c. 1295 - 1366) Literary movements[edit] Goliards Hiberno-Latin Medieval Roman Law Medieval Latin comedy Riddle Poems Works[edit] Carmina Burana (11th - 12th century) Pange Lingua (ca.1250) Summa Theologiae (ca.1270) Etymologiae (ca.600) Dies Irae (ca.1260) Decretum Gratiani (ca.1150) De Ortu Waluuanii Nepotis Arturi (ca.1180) Magna Carta (ca.1215) References[edit] Citations[edit] ^ Ziolkowski, Jan M. (1996), "Towards a History of Medieval Latin Literature", in Mantello, F. A. C.; Rigg, A. G. (eds.), Medieval Latin: An Introduction and Bibliographical Guide, Washington, D.C., pp. 505-536 (pp. 510-511) ^ "Romance languages". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 27 November 2018. ^ J. Franklin, Mental furniture from the philosophers, Et Cetera 40 (1983), 177-91. ^ a b c d Mantello, F. A. C., Rigg, A. G. (1996). Medieval Latin: An Introduction and Bibliographical Guide. United States of America: The Catholic University of America Press. p. 85. ISBN 0813208416. ^ a b Beeson, Charles Henry (1986). A Primer of Medieval Latin: an anthology of prose and poetry. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press. ISBN 0813206359. ^ See Desiderius Erasmus, De recta Latini Graecique sermonis pronunciatione dialogus, Basel (Frobenius), 1528. Sources[edit] K.P. Harrington, J. Pucci, and A.G. Elliott, Medieval Latin (2nd ed.), (Univ. Chicago Press, 1997) ISBN 0-226-31712-9 F.A.C. Mantello and A.G. Rigg, eds., Medieval Latin: An Introduction and Bibliographical Guide (CUA Press, 1996) ISBN 0-8132-0842-4 Dictionaries Du Cange et al., Glossarium ad scriptores mediæ et infimæ latinitatis, Niort : L. Favre, 1883–1887, Ecole des chartes. Thesaurus Linguae Latinae Further reading[edit] Chavannes-Mazel, Claudine A., and Margaret M. Smith, eds. 1996. Medieval Manuscripts of the Latin Classics: Production and Use; Proceedings of the Seminar in the History of the Book to 1500, Leiden, 1993. Los Altos Hills, CA: Anderson-Lovelace. Lapidge, Michael. 1993. Anglo-Latin Literature 900–1066. London and Rio Grande, OH: Hambledon. --. 1996. Anglo-Latin Literature 600–899. London and Rio Grande, OH: Hambledon. Mann, Nicholas, and Birger Munk Olsen, eds. 1997. Medieval and Renaissance Scholarship: Proceedings of the Second European Science Foundation Workshop on the Classical Tradition in the Middle Ages and Renaissance, London: Warburg Institute, 27–28 November 1992. New York: Brill. Mantello, F. A. C., and George Rigg. 1996. Medieval Latin: An Introduction and Bibliographical Guide. Washington, DC: Catholic University of American Press. Pecere, Oronzo, and Michael D. Reeve. 1995. Formative Stages of Classical Traditions: Latin Texts from Antiquity to the Renaissance; Proceedings of a Conference Held at Erice, 16–22 October 1993, as the 6th Course of International School for the Study of Written Records. Spoleto, Italy: Centro Italiano di Studi sull’alto Medioevo. Raby, F. J. E. 1957. A History of Secular Latin Poetry in the Middle Ages. 2 vols. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon. Rigg, A. G. 1992. A History of Anglo-Latin Literature A.D. 1066–1422. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Walde, Christine, ed. 2012. Brill's New Pauly Supplement 5: The Reception of Classical Literature. Leiden, The Netherlands, and Boston: Brill. Ziolkowski, Jan M., 1993. Talking Animals: Medieval Latin Beast Poetry, 750-1150. Philadelphia, PA, University of Pennsylvania Press. Raby, F.J.E., 1959. The Oxford Book of Medieval Latin Verse. Amen House, London, Oxford University Press. Harrington, Karl Pomeroy, 1942. Mediaeval Latin. Norwood, MA, USA, Norwood Press. Dronke, Peter, vol. 1, 1965. Medieval Latin and the Rise of European Love-Lyric. Oxford, UK, Clarendon Press. Bacci, Antonii. Varia Latinitatis Scripta II, Inscriptiones Orationes Epistvlae. Rome, Italy, Societas Librania Stvdivm. Beeson, Charles H., 1925. A Primer of Medieval Latin: An Anthology of Prose and Poetry. Chicago, United States, Scott, Foresman and Company. Curtius, Ernst Roberts, 1953. European Literature and the Latin Middle Ages. New York, New York, United States, Bollingen Foundation Inc. Auerbach, Erich, 1965. Literary Language & Its Public: in Late Latin Antiquity and in the Middle Ages. New York, NY, USA, Bollingen Foundation. External links[edit] Library resources about Medieval Latin Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries In-depth Guides to Learning Latin at the UK National Archives. The Journal of Medieval Latin Wright, Thomas, ed. A Selection of Latin Stories, from Manuscripts of the Thirteenth and Founteenth Centuries: A Contribution to the History of Fiction During the Middle Ages. (London: The Percy Society. 1842.) Corpus Corporum (mlat.uzh.ch) Corpus Thomisticum (corpusthomisticum.org) LacusCurtius (penelope.uchicago.edu) v t e Ages of Latin until 75 BC Old Latin 75 BC – 200 AD Classical Latin 200–900 Late Latin 900–1300 Medieval Latin 1300–1500 Renaissance Latin 1500–1900 New Latin 1900–present Contemporary Latin History of Latin Latin literature Vulgar Latin Ecclesiastical Latin Romance languages Latino sine flexione Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum Hiberno-Latin Judeo-Latin v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films Authority control NKC: ph126229 Europe portal Languages portal Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Medieval_Latin&oldid=992558420" Categories: Latin language Forms of Latin Medieval languages Medieval Latin literature Languages attested from the 4th century 4th-century establishments Languages extinct in the 15th century 15th-century disestablishments in Europe Hidden categories: Articles with short description Short description matches Wikidata Articles needing additional references from May 2013 All articles needing additional references Use dmy dates from November 2015 Historical forms of languages with ISO codes Languages without ISO 639-3 code but with Linguist List code Languages without ISO 639-3 code but with Glottolog code Language articles with unreferenced extinction date Wikipedia articles needing clarification from October 2019 Articles containing Latin-language text Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages العربية Aragonés Asturianu Català Dansk Deutsch Español Esperanto فارسی Français 한국어 Ido Bahasa Indonesia Interlingua Italiano Latina Lumbaart Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Português Română Русский Simple English Slovenčina Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Українська 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 5 December 2020, at 22:22 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2161 ---- Marcus Cornelius Fronto - Wikipedia Marcus Cornelius Fronto From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Marcus Cornelius Fronto (c. 100 – late 160s), best known as Fronto, was a Roman grammarian, rhetorician, and advocate. Of Berber origin, he was born at Cirta in Numidia. He was suffect consul for the nundinium of July-August 142 with Gaius Laberius Priscus as his colleague.[1] Emperor Antoninus Pius appointed him tutor to his adopted sons and future emperors, Marcus Aurelius and Lucius Verus. Contents 1 Life 2 Surviving works 3 References 4 Further reading 5 External links Life[edit] Fronto was born a Roman citizen in the year 100[2] in the Numidian capital, Cirta. He described himself as a Libyan of the nomadic Libyans.[3][4] He was taught as a child by the Greek paedagogus Aridelus.[5][6] Later, he continued his education at Rome,[7] with the philosopher Athenodotus and the orator Dionysius.[8][9] He soon gained such renown as an advocate and orator as to be reckoned inferior only to Cicero. He amassed a large fortune, erected magnificent buildings and purchased the famous gardens of Maecenas.[10] In 142 he was consul for two months (August and September),[11] but declined the proconsulship of Asia on the grounds of ill-health. His latter years were embittered by the loss of all his children except one daughter. His talents as an orator and rhetorician were greatly admired by his contemporaries, a number of whom were later regarded as forming a school called after him Frontoniani; his object in his teaching was to inculcate the exact use of the Latin language in place of the artificialities of such 1st-century authors as Seneca the Younger, and encourage the use of "unlooked-for and unexpected words", to be found by diligent reading of pre-Ciceronian authors. He found fault with Cicero for inattention to that refinement, though admiring his letters without reserve. He may well have died in the late 160s, as a result of the Antonine Plague that followed the Parthian War, though conclusive proof is lacking. C.R. Haines asserts he died in 166 or 167.[12] Surviving works[edit] Until 1815, the only extant works ascribed (erroneously) to Fronto were two grammatical treatises, De nominum verborumque differentiis and Exempla elocutionum (the latter being really by Arusianus Messius). In that year, Angelo Mai discovered in the Ambrosian library at Milan a palimpsest manuscript, on which had been originally written some of Fronto's letters to his imperial pupils and their replies; four years later Mai found several more sheets from this manuscript in the Vatican. These palimpsests had originally belonged to the famous convent of St Columbanus at Bobbio, and had been written over by the monks with the acts of the First Council of Chalcedon. The letters from the Ambrosian palimpsest, together with the other fragments, were published at Rome in 1815. The Vatican texts were added in 1823, as well as the end of his Gratiarum actio pro Carthaginiensibus from another Vatican manuscript. It was not until 1956 that Bernhard Bischoff identified a third manuscript (consisting of a single leaf) that contained fragments of Fronto's correspondence with Verus which overlapped the Milan palimpsest; however, the actual manuscript had been first published in 1750 by Dom Tassin, who conjectured that it might have been the work of Fronto.[13] These fragments disappointed Romantic scholars as not matching the writer's great reputation, partly because Fronto's teachings, with their emphasis on studying ancient writers in search of striking words, were not in accordance with current fashion (Italy, where not only Mai but Leopardi enthused over them, was an exception), partly because they gave no support to the assumption that Fronto had been a wise counsellor to Marcus Aurelius (indeed, they contain no trace of political advice), partly because his frequent complaints about ill-health, especially those collected in book 5 of Ad M. Caesarem, aroused more annoyance than compassion; these adverse judgements were reversed once Fronto was read for what he was rather than what he was not, as already in the sympathetic treatment by Dorothy Brock, Studies in Fronto and his Age (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1911). The bulk of the letters consist of correspondence with Antoninus Pius, Marcus Aurelius and Lucius Verus, in which the character of Fronto's pupils appears in a very favourable light, especially in the affection they both seem to have retained for their old master[14] There are also letters to friends, chiefly letters of recommendation, but including one (Ad amicos 1. 19) in which an out-of-sorts Fronto (ego epistulas invitissime scribo, "I hate writing letters") complains of Aulus Gellius' attempts to procure copies of his writings for publication. (Fronto appears in five chapters of the Noctes Atticae, though expressing tastes that sometime seem closer to Gellius' own than to those evinced in the letters.) The collection also contains treatises on eloquence, some historical fragments, and literary trifles on such subjects as the praise of smoke and dust, of negligence, and a dissertation on Arion. In addition, a fragment of a speech is preserved by Minucius Felix (Octavius 9. 6-7) in which Fronto accuses the Christians of incestuous orgies. Marcus Aurelius, in his Meditations, says nothing of Fronto's rhetorical teaching; nor, although writing in Greek, does he so much as mention his teacher of Greek rhetoric and longtime friend Herodes Atticus. He does, however, credit Fronto with teaching him about the vices of tyranny and the lack of affection in the Roman upper class (1.11); since the former were commonplaces, there may be a concealed reference to life under Hadrian, whom Fronto retrospectively claims to have feared rather than loved,[15] but the latter is borne out by the master's remark that there is no Latin equivalent for the Greek philóstorgos, meaning "affectionate".[16] The editio princeps was by Mai, as described above; the standard edition is the Teubner text by M. van den Hout (Leipzig, 1988). The Loeb Classical Library printed an edition of Fronto's correspondence with a facing English translation by C. R. Haines in two volumes (1919–1920); its text, though dated, is still of interest. Van den Hout also published a full-scale commentary in English (Leiden, 1999). References[edit] ^ Werner Eck, "Die Fasti consulares der Regungszeit des Antoninus Pius, eine Bestandsaufnahme seit Géza Alföldys Konsulat und Senatorenstand" in Studia epigraphica in memoriam Géza Alföldy, hg. W. Eck, B. Feher, and P. Kovács (Bonn, 2013), p. 73 ^ "or a year or two earlier", C.R. Haines, p.lii. See also p. xxiii: "The probable date of his birth is 100 A.D., and in any case before 113 A.D." ^ Ad M. Caesarem 2. 3. 5; cf. A. R. Birley, The African Emperor (London: Batsford, 1999), 43. ^ Edward Champlin, Fronto and Antonine Rome (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980), 7–8. ^ Ballif, Michelle; Moran, Michael G. (2005). Classical Rhetorics and Rhetoricians: Critical Studies and Sources. Greenwood. p. 83. ISBN 978-0313321788. ^ Hout, Michel P J (1999). A Commentary on the Letters of M. Cornelius Fronto. Brill. p. 1. ISBN 978-9004109575. ^ Champlin, Fronto, 20 ^ Fronto, M. Cornelius (2014). Fronto: Selected Letters. Bloomsbury Academic. p. 163. ISBN 978-1780934426. ^ Greek Letters-Marcus Cornelius Fronto ^ Aulus Gellius, 19.10 ^ W. Eck and M. M. Roxan in Festschrift für Hans Lieb 1995, p. 79-99 ^ "There can be little doubt that he predeceased Verus and died in 166 or 167". C.R. Haines, p. xl. ^ This account of Fronto's rediscovery is based on L.D. Reynolds (editor), Texts and Transmission: A Survey of the Latin Classics (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983), pp. 173f. ^ Amy Richlin, Marcus Aurelius in Love (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006). ^ Ad M. Caesarem 2.4.1; a certain distancing from Hadrian may be observed in the actions of Antoninus Pius and the words of Marcus Aurelius. ^ Ad Verum 1.6.7, Ad amicos 1.3.3 (margin). Further reading[edit] Champlin, E. 1980. Fronto and Antonine Rome. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press. Claassen, J. M. 2009. "Cornelius Fronto: A “Libyan Nomad” at Rome." Acta Classica 52:47–71. Fleury, P. 2012. "Marcus Aurelius’ Letters." In A Companion to Marcus Aurelius. Edited by M. van Ackeren, 62–76. Oxford and Malden, MA: Blackwell. Freisenbruch, A. 2007. "Back to Fronto: Doctor and Patient in His Correspondence with an Emperor." In Ancient Letters: Classical and Late Antique Epistolography. Edited by R. Morello and A. D. Morrison, 235–256. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. Kemezis, A. M. 2010. "Lucian, Fronto, and the Absence of Contemporary Historiography Under the Antonines." American Journal of Philology 131:285–325. Keulen, W. 2014. "Fronto and Apuleius: Two African Careers in the Roman Empire." In Apuleius and Africa. Edited by B. Todd Lee, E. Finkelpearl, and L. Graverini, 129–153. London: Routledge. Mullen, A. 2015. “In Both Our Languages:" Greek-Latin Code-switching in Roman Literature." Language and Literature 24:213–232. Richlin, A. 2011. "Parallel Lives: Domitia Lucilla and Cratia, Fronto and Marcus." Eugesta 1:163–203. Ronnick, M. V. 1997. "Substructural Elements of Architectonic Rhetoric and Philosophical Thought in Fronto’s Epistles." In Roman Eloquence: Rhetoric in Society and Literature. Edited by W. J. Dominik, 229–245. London and New York: Routledge. Wei, R. 2013. "Fronto and the Rhetoric of Friendship." Cahiers des études anciennes 50: 67-93. External links[edit] Wikisource has original works written by or about: Marcus Cornelius Fronto Library resources about Marcus Cornelius Fronto Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries By Marcus Cornelius Fronto Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries The correspondence of Marcus Cornelius Fronto. Edited and translated by C. R. Haines (1919). Volume 1, Volume 2, at the Internet Archive. Alternate links to the same: Loeb edition vol. 1 and Loeb edition vol. 2 M. Cornelius Fronto: Epistulae (Latin text)  This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Fronto, Marcus Cornelius". Encyclopædia Britannica. 11 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 250. Political offices Preceded by Lucius Granius Castus, and Tiberius Junius Julianus as suffect consuls Suffect consul of the Roman Empire 142 with Gaius Laberius Priscus Succeeded by Lucius Tusidius Campester, and Quintus Cornelius Senecio Annianus as suffect consuls Authority control BIBSYS: 90357972 BNE: XX1724652 BNF: cb121186639 (data) CANTIC: a19746210 CiNii: DA03048717 GND: 118536451 ISNI: 0000 0001 1573 0602 LCCN: n79151442 NKC: ola2011663363 NLA: 35105684 NLG: 229886 NSK: 000480950 NTA: 068668171 RERO: 02-A000066747 SELIBR: 187604 SUDOC: 029593840 Trove: 828200 VcBA: 495/19181 VIAF: 66499129 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n79151442 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marcus_Cornelius_Fronto&oldid=981554777" Categories: 100s births 160s deaths 2nd-century Berber people 2nd-century Romans 2nd-century writers Ancient Roman rhetoricians Berber writers Cornelii Latin letter writers Romans from Africa Silver Age Latin writers Suffect consuls of Imperial Rome Hidden categories: Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica with Wikisource reference Wikipedia articles incorporating text from the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CANTIC identifiers Wikipedia articles with CINII identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLG identifiers Wikipedia articles with NSK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with RERO identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with Trove identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikisource Languages Asturianu Български Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Español Français Հայերեն Hrvatski Italiano עברית Latina Magyar مصرى Nederlands Polski Português Русский Slovenčina Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Українська 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 3 October 2020, at 01:31 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2169 ---- Alcaeus of Mytilene - Wikipedia Alcaeus of Mytilene From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Greek lyric poet Alcaeus and Sappho, Attic red-figure calathus, c. 470 BC, Staatliche Antikensammlungen (Inv. 2416) Alcaeus of Mytilene (/ælˈsiːəs/; Ancient Greek: Ἀλκαῖος ὁ Μυτιληναῖος, Alkaios ho Mutilēnaios; c. 625/620 – c. 580 BC)[1][2] was a lyric poet from the Greek island of Lesbos who is credited with inventing the Alcaic stanza. He was included in the canonical list of nine lyric poets by the scholars of Hellenistic Alexandria. He was a contemporary and an alleged lover of Sappho, with whom he may have exchanged poems. He was born into the aristocratic governing class of Mytilene, the main city of Lesbos, where he was involved in political disputes and feuds. Contents 1 Biography 2 Poetry 2.1 Poetic genres 2.2 A drinking poem (fr. 346) 2.3 A hymn (fr. 34) 3 Tributes from other poets 3.1 Horace 3.2 Ovid 4 Scholars, fragments and sources 5 References 6 Sources 7 External links Biography[edit] Alcaeus "A probably authentic Lesbian coin has been preserved, bearing upon the obverse ... a profile head of Alcaeus, and upon the reverse ...a profile head of Pittacus. This coin is said to have belonged to Fulvius Ursinus. It passed through various hands and collections into the Royal Museum at Paris, and was engraved by the Chevalier Visconti." — J. Easby-Smith[3] Pittacus The broad outlines of the poet's life are well known.[4][5][6] He was born into the aristocratic, warrior class that dominated Mytilene, the strongest city-state on the island of Lesbos and, by the end of the seventh century BC, the most influential of all the North Aegean Greek cities, with a strong navy and colonies securing its trade-routes in the Hellespont. The city had long been ruled by kings born to the Penthilid clan but, during the poet's life, the Penthilids were a spent force and rival aristocrats and their factions contended with each other for supreme power. Alcaeus and his older brothers were passionately involved in the struggle but experienced little success. Their political adventures can be understood in terms of three tyrants who came and went in succession: Melanchrus – he was overthrown sometime between 612 BC and 609 BC by a faction that, in addition to the brothers of Alcaeus, included Pittacus (later renowned as one of the Seven Sages of Greece); Alcaeus at that time was too young to be actively involved; Myrsilus – it is not known when he came to power but some verses by Alcaeus (frag. 129) indicate that the poet, his brothers and Pittacus made plans to overthrow him and that Pittacus subsequently betrayed them; Alcaeus and his brothers fled into exile where the poet later wrote a drinking song in celebration of the news of the tyrant's death (frag. 332); Pittacus – the dominant political figure of his time, he was voted supreme power by the political assembly of Mytilene and appears to have governed well (590-580 BC), even allowing Alcaeus and his faction to return home in peace. Sometime before 600 BC, Mytilene fought Athens for control of Sigeion and Alcaeus was old enough to participate in the fighting. According to the historian Herodotus,[7] the poet threw away his shield to make good his escape from the victorious Athenians then celebrated the occasion in a poem that he later sent to his friend, Melanippus. It is thought that Alcaeus travelled widely during his years in exile, including at least one visit to Egypt. His older brother, Antimenidas, appears to have served as a mercenary in the army of Nebuchadnezzar II and probably took part in the conquest of Askelon. Alcaeus wrote verses in celebration of Antimenides' return, including mention of his valour in slaying the larger opponent (frag. 350), and he proudly describes the military hardware that adorned their family home (frag. 357). "Alcaeus was in some respects not unlike a Royalist soldier of the age of the Stuarts. He had the high spirit and reckless gaiety, the love of country bound up with belief in a caste, the licence tempered by generosity and sometimes by tenderness, of a cavalier who has seen good and evil days." — Richard Claverhouse Jebb[8] Sappho and Alcaeus by Lawrence Alma-Tadema. The Walters Art Museum. Alcaeus was a contemporary and a countryman of Sappho and, since both poets composed for the entertainment of Mytilenean friends, they had many opportunities to associate with each other on a quite regular basis, such as at the Kallisteia, an annual festival celebrating the island's federation under Mytilene, held at the 'Messon' (referred to as temenos in frs. 129 and 130), where Sappho performed publicly with female choirs. Alcaeus' reference to Sappho in terms more typical of a divinity, as holy/pure, honey-smiling Sappho (fr. 384), may owe its inspiration to her performances at the festival.[9] The Lesbian or Aeolic school of poetry "reached in the songs of Sappho and Alcaeus that high point of brilliancy to which it never after-wards approached"[10] and it was assumed by later Greek critics and during the early centuries of the Christian era that the two poets were in fact lovers, a theme which became a favourite subject in art (as in the urn pictured above). Poetry[edit] The poetic works of Alcaeus were collected into ten books, with elaborate commentaries, by the Alexandrian scholars Aristophanes of Byzantium and Aristarchus of Samothrace sometime in the 3rd century BC, and yet his verses today exist only in fragmentary form, varying in size from mere phrases, such as wine, window into a man (fr. 333) to entire groups of verses and stanzas, such as those quoted below (fr. 346). Alexandrian scholars numbered him in their canonic nine (one lyric poet per Muse). Among these, Pindar was held by many ancient critics to be pre-eminent,[11] but some gave precedence to Alcaeus instead.[12] The canonic nine are traditionally divided into two groups, with Alcaeus, Sappho and Anacreon, being 'monodists' or 'solo-singers', with the following characteristics:[13] They composed and performed personally for friends and associates on topics of immediate interest to them; They wrote in their native dialects (Alcaeus and Sappho in Aeolic dialect, Anacreon in Ionic); They preferred quite short, metrically simple stanzas or 'strophes' which they re-used in many poems — hence the 'Alcaic' and 'Sapphic' stanzas, named after the two poets who perfected them or possibly invented them. The other six of the canonic nine composed verses for public occasions, performed by choruses and professional singers and typically featuring complex metrical arrangements that were never reproduced in other verses. However, this division into two groups is considered by some modern scholars to be too simplistic and often it is practically impossible to know whether a lyric composition was sung or recited, or whether or not it was accompanied by musical instruments and dance. Even the private reflections of Alcaeus, ostensibly sung at dinner parties, still retain a public function.[9] Critics often seek to understand Alcaeus in comparison with Sappho: If we compare the two, we find that Alcaeus is versatile, Sappho narrow in her range; that his verse is less polished and less melodious than hers; and that the emotions which he chooses to display are less intense. — David Campbell[14] The Aeolian song is suddenly revealed, as a mature work of art, in the spirited stanzas of Alcaeus. It is raised to a supreme excellence by his younger contemporary, Sappho, whose melody is unsurpassed, perhaps unequalled, among all the relics of Greek verse. — Richard Jebb[15] In the variety of his subjects, in the exquisite rhythm of his meters, and in the faultless perfection of his style, all of which appear even in mutilated fragments, he excels all the poets, even his more intense, more delicate and more truly inspired contemporary Sappho. — James Easby-Smith[12] The Roman poet, Horace, also compared the two, describing Alcaeus as "more full-throatedly singing"[16] — see Horace's tribute below. Alcaeus himself seems to underscore the difference between his own 'down-to-earth' style and Sappho's more 'celestial' qualities when he describes her almost as a goddess (as cited above), and yet it has been argued that both poets were concerned with a balance between the divine and the profane, each emphasising different elements in that balance.[9] Dionysius of Halicarnassus exhorts us to "Observe in Alcaeus the sublimity, brevity and sweetness coupled with stern power, his splendid figures, and his clearness which was unimpaired by the dialect; and above all mark his manner of expressing his sentiments on public affairs,"[17] while Quintilian, after commending Alcaeus for his excellence "in that part of his works where he inveighs against tyrants and contributes to good morals; in his language he is concise, exalted, careful and often like an orator;" goes on to add: "but he descended into wantonness and amours, though better fitted for higher things."[18] Poetic genres[edit] The works of Alcaeus are conventionally grouped according to five genres. Political songs: Alcaeus often composed on a political theme, covering the power struggles on Lesbos with the passion and vigour of a partisan, cursing his opponents,[19] rejoicing in their deaths,[20] delivering blood-curdling homilies on the consequences of political inaction[21] and exhorting his comrades to heroic defiance, as in one of his 'ship of state' allegories.[22] Commenting on Alcaeus as a political poet, the scholar Dionysius of Halicarnassus once observed that "...if you removed the meter you would find political rhetoric."[23] Drinking songs: According to the grammarian Athenaeus, Alcaeus made every occasion an excuse for drinking and he has provided posterity several quotes in proof of it.[24] Alcaeus exhorts his friends to drink in celebration of a tyrant's death,[20] to drink away their sorrows,[25] to drink because life is short[26] and along the lines in vino veritas,[27] to drink through winter storms[28] and to drink through the heat of summer.[29] The latter poem in fact paraphrases verses from Hesiod,[30] re-casting them in Asclepiad meter and Aeolian dialect. Hymns: Alcaeus sang about the gods in the spirit of the Homeric hymns, to entertain his companions rather than to glorify the gods and in the same meters that he used for his 'secular' lyrics.[31] There are for example fragments in 'Sapphic' meter praising the Dioscuri,[32] Hermes[33] and the river Hebrus[34] (a river significant in Lesbian mythology since it was down its waters that the head of Orpheus was believed to have floated singing, eventually crossing the sea to Lesbos and ending up in a temple of Apollo, as a symbol of Lesbian supremacy in song).[35] According to Porphyrion, the hymn to Hermes was imitated by Horace in one of his own 'sapphic' odes (C.1.10: Mercuri, facunde nepos Atlantis).[36] Love songs: Almost all Alcaeus' amorous verses, mentioned with disapproval by Quintilian above, have vanished without trace. There is a brief reference to his love poetry in a passage by Cicero.[37] Horace, who often wrote in imitation of Alcaeus, sketches in verse one of the Lesbian poet's favourite subjects — Lycus of the black hair and eyes (C.1.32.11-12: nigris oculis nigroque/crine decorum). It is possible that Alcaeus wrote amorously about Sappho, as indicated in an earlier quote.[38] Miscellaneous: Alcaeus wrote on such a wide variety of subjects and themes that contradictions in his character emerge. The grammarian Athenaeus quoted some verses about perfumed ointments to prove just how unwarlike Alcaeus could be[39] and he quoted his description of the armour adorning the walls of his house[40] as proof that he could be unusually warlike for a lyric poet.[41] Other examples of his readiness for both warlike and unwarlike subjects are lyrics celebrating his brother's heroic exploits as a Babylonian mercenary[42] and lyrics sung in a rare meter (Sapphic Ionic in minore) in the voice of a distressed girl,[43] "Wretched me, who share in all ills!" — possibly imitated by Horace in an ode in the same meter (C.3.12: Miserarum est neque amori dare ludum neque dulci).[44] He also wrote Sapphic stanzas on Homeric themes but in un-Homeric style, comparing Helen of Troy unfavourably with Thetis, the mother of Akhilles.[45] A drinking poem (fr. 346)[edit] The following verses demonstrate some key characteristics of the Alcaic style (square brackets indicate uncertainties in the ancient text): πώνωμεν· τί τὰ λύχν' ὀμμένομεν; δάκτυλος ἀμέρα· κὰδ δ'ἄερρε κυλίχναις μεγάλαις [αιτα]ποικίλαισ· οἶνον γὰρ Σεμέλας καὶ Δίος υἶος λαθικάδεον ἀνθρώποισιν ἔδωκ'. ἔγχεε κέρναις ἔνα καὶ δύο πλήαις κὰκ κεφάλας, [ἀ] δ' ἀτέρα τὰν ἀτέραν κύλιξ ὠθήτω...[46] Let's drink! Why are we waiting for the lamps? Only an inch of daylight left. Lift down the large cups, my friends, the painted ones; for wine was given to men by the son of Semele and Zeus to help them forget their troubles. Mix one part of water to two of wine, pour it in up to the brim, and let one cup push the other along...[47] The Greek meter here is relatively simple, comprising the Greater Asclepiad, adroitly used to convey, for example, the rhythm of jostling cups (ἀ δ' ἀτέρα τὰν ἀτέραν). The language of the poem is typically direct and concise and comprises short sentences — the first line is in fact a model of condensed meaning, comprising an exhortation ("Let's drink!), a rhetorical question ("Why are we waiting for the lamps?") and a justifying statement (Only an inch of daylight left.)[48] The meaning is clear and uncomplicated, the subject is drawn from personal experience, and there is an absence of poetic ornament, such as simile or metaphor. Like many of his poems (e.g., frs. 38, 326, 338, 347, 350), it begins with a verb (in this case "Let's drink!") and it includes a proverbial expression ("Only an inch of daylight left") though it is possible that he coined it himself.[14] A hymn (fr. 34)[edit] Alcaeus rarely used metaphor or simile and yet he had a fondness for the allegory of the storm-tossed ship of state. The following fragment of a hymn to Castor and Polydeuces (the Dioscuri) is possibly another example of this though some scholars interpret it instead as a prayer for a safe voyage.[49] Hither now to me from your isle of Pelops, You powerful children of Zeus and Leda, Showing youselves kindly by nature, Castor And Polydeuces! Travelling abroad on swift-footed horses, Over the wide earth, over all the ocean, How easily you bring deliverance from Death's gelid rigor, Landing on tall ships with a sudden, great bound, A far-away light up the forestays running, Bringing radiance to a ship in trouble, Sailed in the darkness! The poem was written in Sapphic stanzas, a verse form popularly associated with his compatriot, Sappho, but in which he too excelled, here paraphrased in English to suggest the same rhythms. There were probably another three stanzas in the original poem but only nine letters of them remain.[50] The 'far-away light' (Πήλοθεν λάμπροι) is a reference to St. Elmo's Fire, an electrical discharge supposed by ancient Greek mariners to be an epiphany of the Dioscuri, but the meaning of the line was obscured by gaps in the papyrus until reconstructed by a modern scholar—such reconstructions are typical of the extant poetry (see Scholars, fragments and sources below). This poem doesn't begin with a verb but with an adverb (Δευτέ) but still communicates a sense of action. He probably performed his verses at drinking parties for friends and political allies—men for whom loyalty was essential, particularly in such troubled times.[44] Tributes from other poets[edit] Horace[edit] The Roman poet Horace modelled his own lyrical compositions on those of Alcaeus, rendering the Lesbian poet's verse-forms, including 'Alcaic' and 'Sapphic' stanzas, into concise Latin — an achievement he celebrates in his third book of odes.[51] In his second book, in an ode composed in Alcaic stanzas on the subject of an almost fatal accident he had on his farm, he imagines meeting Alcaeus and Sappho in Hades: quam paene furvae regna Proserpinae et iudicantem vidimus Aeacum sedesque descriptas piorum et Aeoliis fidibus querentem Sappho puellis de popularibus et te sonantem plenius aureo, Alcaee, plectro dura navis, dura fugae mala, dura belli! [52] How close the realm of dusky Proserpine Yawned at that instant! I half glimpsed the dire Judge of the dead, the blest in their divine Seclusion, Sappho on the Aeolian lyre, Mourning the cold girls of her native isle, And you, Alcaeus, more full-throatedly Singing with your gold quill of ships, exile And war, hardship on land, hardship at sea.[16] Ovid[edit] Ovid compared Alcaeus to Sappho in Letters of the Heroines, where Sappho is imagined to speak as follows: nec plus Alcaeus consors patriaeque lyraeque laudis habet, quamvis grandius ille sonet. Nor does Alcaeus, my fellow-countryman and fellow-poet, receive more praise, although he resounds more grandly.[53] Scholars, fragments and sources[edit] A 2nd century AD papyrus of Alcaeus, one of the many such fragments that have contributed to our greatly improved knowledge of Alcaeus' poetry during the 20th century (P.Berol. inv. 9810 = fr. 137 L.–P.). The story of Alcaeus is partly the story of the scholars who rescued his work from oblivion.[6][54] His verses have not come down to us through a manuscript tradition — generations of scribes copying an author's collected works, such as delivered intact into the modern age four entire books of Pindar's odes — but haphazardly, in quotes from ancient scholars and commentators whose own works have chanced to survive, and in the tattered remnants of papyri uncovered from an ancient rubbish pile at Oxyrhynchus and other locations in Egypt: sources that modern scholars have studied and correlated exhaustively, adding little by little to the world's store of poetic fragments. Ancient scholars quoted Alcaeus in support of various arguments. Thus for example Heraclitus 'The Allegorist'[55] quoted fr. 326 and part of fr. 6, about ships in a storm, in his study on Homer's use of allegory.[56] The hymn to Hermes, fr308(b), was quoted by Hephaestion (grammarian)[57] and both he and Libanius, the rhetorician, quoted the first two lines of fr. 350,[58] celebrating the return from Babylon of Alcaeus' brother. The rest of fr. 350 was paraphrased in prose by the historian/geographer Strabo.[59] Many fragments were supplied in quotes by Athenaeus, principally on the subject of wine-drinking, but fr. 333, "wine, window into a man", was quoted much later by the Byzantine grammarian, John Tzetzes.[60] The first 'modern' publication of Alcaeus' verses appeared in a Greek and Latin edition of fragments collected from the canonic nine lyrical poets by Michael Neander, published at Basle in 1556. This was followed by another edition of the nine poets, collected by Henricus Stephanus and published in Paris in 1560. Fulvius Ursinus compiled a fuller collection of Alcaic fragments, including a commentary, which was published at Antwerp in 1568. The first separate edition of Alcaeus was by Christian David Jani and it was published at Halle in 1780. The next separate edition was by August Matthiae, Leipzig 1827. Some of the fragments quoted by ancient scholars were able to be integrated by scholars in the nineteenth century. Thus for example two separate quotes by Athenaeus[61] were united by Theodor Bergk to form fr. 362. Three separate sources were combined to form fr. 350, as mentioned above, including a prose paraphrase from Strabo that first needed to be restored to its original meter, a synthesis achieved by the united efforts of Otto Hoffmann, Karl Otfried Müller[62] and Franz Heinrich Ludolf Ahrens. The discovery of the Oxyrhynchus papyri towards the end of the nineteenth century dramatically increased the scope of scholarly research. In fact, eight important fragments have now been compiled from papyri — frs. 9, 38A, 42, 45, 34, 129, 130 and most recently S262. These fragments typically feature lacunae or gaps that scholars fill with 'educated guesses', including for example a "brilliant supplement" by Maurice Bowra in fr. 34, a hymn to the Dioscuri that includes a description of St. Elmo's fire in the ship's rigging.[63] Working with only eight letters (πρό...τρ...ντες; tr. pró...tr...ntes), Bowra conjured up a phrase that develops the meaning and the euphony of the poem (πρότον' ὀντρέχοντες; tr. próton' ontréchontes), describing luminescence "running along the forestays". References[edit] ^ Carey, C. (2016-03-07). "Alcaeus (1), lyric poet". Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Classics. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199381135.013.254. ^ "Alcaeus | Greek poet". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 2019-10-17. ^ J. Easby-Smith, The Songs of Alcaeus, W. H. Lowdermilk and Co. (1901) ^ David Mulroy, Early Greek Lyric Poetry, University of Michigan Press, 1992, pp. 77–78 ^ David. A. Campbell, Greek Lyric Poetry, Bristol Classic Press, 1982, pp. 285–7 ^ a b Easby-Smith, James S. (1901). "The Songs of Alcaeus". Washington: W. H. Lowdermilk and Co. ^ Histories 5.95 ^ R. C. Jebb, Greek Literature, MacMillan and Co. 1878, p. 59 ^ a b c Nagy, Gregory (2007). Lyric and Greek Myth (The Cambridge Companion to Greek Mythology). ed. R. D. Woodward, Cambridge University Press. pp. 19–51. ^ James S. Easby-Smith, The Songs of Alcaeus, W. H. Lowdermilk and Co., Washington, 1901 ^ Quintilian 10.1.61; cf. Pseudo-Longinus 33.5 Archived 2011-08-06 at the Wayback Machine. ^ a b James Easby-Smith, The Songs of Alcaeus p.31 ^ Andrew M.Miller (trans.), Greek Lyric: An Anthology in Translation, Hackett Publishing Co. (1996), Intro. xiii ^ a b David A. Campbell, Greek Lyric Poetry, Bristol Classical Press (1982), p. 287 ^ Jebb, Richard (1905). Bacchylides: the poems and fragments. Cambridge University Press. p. 29. ^ a b James Michie (trans.), The Odes of Horace, Penguin Classics (1964), p. 116 ^ Imit. 422, quoted from Easby-Smith in Songs of Alcaeus ^ Quintillian 10.1.63, quoted by D.Campbell in G.L.P, p. 288 ^ fr. 129 ^ a b fr. 332 ^ fr. S262 ^ fr. 6 ^ Imit. 422, quoted by Campbell in G.L.P., p. 286 ^ Athenaeus 10.430c ^ Frs. 335, 346 ^ fr. 38A ^ fr. 333 ^ fr. 338 ^ fr. 347 ^ Hesiod Op. 582–8 ^ David A. Campbell, Greek Lyric Poetry, Bristol Classical Press (1982), p. 286 ^ fr. 34a ^ fr. 308c ^ fr. 45 ^ David A. Campbell, Greek Lyric Poetry, Bristol Classical Press (1982), pp. 292–3 ^ David Campbell, 'Monody', in The Cambridge History of Classical Literature: Greek Literature, P. Easterling and E. Kenney (eds), Cambridge University Press (1985), p. 213 ^ Cicero, Tusc. Disp. 4.71 ^ fr. 384; however, Liberman (1999) reads "Aphro" (Ἄφροι; a diminutive of "Aphrodite"), instead of "Sappho". ^ fr. 362, Athenaeus 15.687d ^ fr. 357 ^ Athenaeus 14.627a ^ fr. 350 ^ fr. 10B ^ a b David Campbell, 'Monody', in The Cambridge History of Classical Literature: Greek Literature, P. Easterling and E. Kenney (eds), Cambridge University Press (1985), p. 214 ^ fr. 42 ^ David A. Campbell, Greek Lyric Poetry, Bristol Classical Press (1982), p. 60 ^ Andrew M.Miller (trans.), Greek Lyric: An Anthology in Translation, Hackett Publishing Co. (1996), p. 48 ^ David Campbell, 'Monody', in The Cambridge History of Classical Literature: Greek Literature, P. Easterling and E. Kenney (eds), Cambridge University Press (1985), p. 212 ^ David A. Campbell, Greek Lyric Poetry, Bristol Classical Press (1982), pp. 286, 289 ^ David A. Campbell, Greek Lyric Vol. I, Loeb Classical Library (1990), p. 247 ^ Horace Od. 3.30 ^ Horace Od. 2.13.21–8 ^ Ovid Her.15.29s, cited and translated by David A. Campbell, Greek Lyric I: Sappho and Alcaeus, Loeb Classical Library (1982), p. 39 ^ David. A. Campbell, Greek Lyric Poetry, Bristol Classic Press, 1982, pp. 285–305 ^ Donald. A. Russell and David Konstan (ed.s and tran.s.), Heraclitus:Homeric Problems, Society of Biblical Literature (2005), Introduction ^ Heraclitus All.5 ^ Hephaestion Ench. xiv.1 ^ Hephaestion Ench. x 3; Libanus Or. 13.5 ^ Strabo 13.617 ^ Tzetzes Alex. 212 ^ Athenaeus 15.674cd, 15.687d ^ Müller, Karl Otfried, "Ein Bruder des Dichters Alkäos ficht unter Nebukadnezar," Rheinisches Museum 1 (1827):287. ^ David. A. Campbell, Greek Lyric Poetry, Bristol Classic Press, 1982, p. 290 Sources[edit] Sappho et Alcaeus. Fragmenta. Eva-Maria Voigt (ed.). Polak and van Gennep, Amsterdam, 1971. Greek Lyric Poetry. D.A. Campbell (ed.). Bristol Classical Press, London, 1982. ISBN 978-0-86292-008-1 Greek Lyric 1: Sappho and Alcaeus. D. A. Campbell (ed.). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1982. ISBN 978-0-674-99157-6 Alcée. Fragments. Gauthier Liberman (ed.). Collection Budé, Paris, 1999. ISBN 978-2-251-00476-1 Sappho and the Greek Lyric Poets. Translated by Willis Barnstone. Schoken Books Inc., New York, 1988. ISBN 978-0-8052-0831-3 External links[edit] Alcaeus of Mytileneat Wikipedia's sister projects Media from Wikimedia Commons Texts from Wikisource Data from Wikidata Greek Wikisource has original text related to this article: Ἀλκαῖος ὁ Μυτιληναῖος Works by or about Alcaeus of Mytilene at Internet Archive Works by Alcaeus of Mytilene at LibriVox (public domain audiobooks) Poems by Alcaeus – English translations A. M. Miller, Greek Lyric: – Alcaeus, many fragments Alcaeus Bilingual Anthology (in Greek and English, side by side) v t e Nine lyric poets — Ancient Greek literature Alcman Sappho Alcaeus Anacreon Stesichorus Ibycus Simonides Pindar Bacchylides Authority control BIBSYS: 90193838 BNE: XX995176 BNF: cb121387870 (data) CANTIC: a11132449 CiNii: DA00907587 GND: 118501720 ISNI: 0000 0001 1839 1183 LCCN: n81024909 MBA: e48e97fc-97ba-4e89-af15-0b0783022a0d NKC: jn19981000081 NSK: 000141705 NTA: 069035121 SELIBR: 175080 SUDOC: 02984701X Trove: 1175794 VcBA: 495/7392 VIAF: 228050642 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n81024909 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alcaeus_of_Mytilene&oldid=980915586" Categories: Nine Lyric Poets Aeolic Greek poets Ancient Greek political refugees Ancient Mytileneans Poets from Ancient Lesbos 620s BC births 6th-century BC deaths 6th-century BC Greek people 6th-century BC poets Hidden categories: Articles containing Ancient Greek (to 1453)-language text Webarchive template wayback links Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata Pages using Sister project links with hidden wikidata Articles with Internet Archive links Articles with LibriVox links Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CANTIC identifiers Wikipedia articles with CINII identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with MusicBrainz identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NSK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with Trove identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikiquote Wikisource Languages العربية Aragonés Беларуская Български Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Estremeñu Euskara فارسی Français Galego 한국어 Հայերեն Hrvatski Ido Bahasa Indonesia Íslenska Italiano עברית ಕನ್ನಡ Latina Latviešu Magyar Македонски Mirandés Монгол Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Polski Português Română Русский Sicilianu Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Українська 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 29 September 2020, at 06:50 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2180 ---- Category:Wikipedia articles with NSK identifiers - Wikipedia Help Category:Wikipedia articles with NSK identifiers From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search This category is for articles with NSK identifiers. Please do not add subcategories. For more information, see Wikipedia:Authority control. Administrators: Please do not delete this category even if it is empty! This category may be empty occasionally or even most of the time. This is a maintenance category, used for maintenance of the Wikipedia project. It is not part of the encyclopedia and contains non-article pages, or groups articles by status rather than subject. Do not include this category in content categories. This is a tracking category. It builds and maintains a list of pages primarily for the sake of the list itself. They are not part of the encyclopedia's categorization scheme. This category is hidden on its member pages—unless the corresponding user preference (appearance → show hidden categories) is set. These categories are used to track, build and organize lists of pages needing "attention en masse" (for example, pages using deprecated syntax), or that may need to be edited at someone's earliest convenience. These categories also serve to aggregate members of several lists or sub-categories into a larger, more efficient list (discriminated by classifications). Contents: Top 0–9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z * # 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 • A Aa Ae Aj Ao At • B Ba Be Bj Bo Bt • C Ca Ce Cj Co Ct • D Da De Dj Do Dt • E Ea Ee Ej Eo Et • F Fa Fe Fj Fo Ft • G Ga Ge Gj Go Gt • H Ha He Hj Ho Ht • I Ia Ie Ij Io It • J Ja Je Jj Jo Jt • K Ka Ke Kj Ko Kt • L La Le Lj Lo Lt • M Ma Me Mj Mo Mt • N Na Ne Nj No Nt • O Oa Oe Oj Oo Ot • P Pa Pe Pj Po Pt • Q Qa Qe Qj Qo Qt • R Ra Re Rj Ro Rt • S Sa Se Sj So St • T Ta Te Tj To Tt • U Ua Ue Uj Uo Ut • V Va Ve Vj Vo Vt • W Wa We Wj Wo Wt • X Xa Xe Xj Xo Xt • Y Ya Ye Yj Yo Yt • Z Za Ze Zj Zo Zt Pages in this category should only be added by Module:Authority control. Pages in category "Wikipedia articles with NSK identifiers" The following 200 pages are in this category, out of approximately 7,703 total. This list may not reflect recent changes (learn more). (previous page) (next page), Yamaguchi Seishi A Abraham Jacob van der Aa Pieter van der Aa Aachen Hans von Aachen Iñaki Ábalos Antonio Abati Mostafa El-Abbadi Claudio Abbado Nicola Abbagnano John Stevens Cabot Abbott Anouar Abdel-Malek ʻAbdu'l-Bahá Paula Abdul Kōbō Abe Masao Abe Julius Friedrich Heinrich Abegg Lily Abegg Peter Abelard Wolfgang Abendroth Miguel Abensour Minnie Abercrombie Milan Kujundžić Aberdar Rohan Abeyaratne Abhishiktananda Abu Sa'id Abu'l-Khayr Edmond François Valentin About Marina Abramović M. H. Abrams Hermann Josef Abs Franz Abt Janet Abu-Lughod Academy of St Martin in the Fields Benedetto Accolti the Elder Chinua Achebe Brooke Ackerly Lauren Ackerman Rudolph Ackermann Wilhelm Ackermann J. L. Ackrill Nicola Acocella Claudio Acquaviva Acromegaly George Acsinteanu H. B. Acton John Dalberg-Acton, 1st Baron Acton Hernando de Acuña Adam of Bremen Adolphe Adam Barbara Adam Salimbene di Adam Theo Adam Louis Adamic Salvatore Adamo Vicko Adamović Georgy Adamovich Douglas Adams Jay E. Adams John Adams Joseph Addison Kim Addonizio Eshref Ademaj Konrad Adenauer Olanike Adeyemo Freda Adler Irving Adler Victor Adler Rolena Adorno Adunis Endre Ady Claudius Aelianus Aelius Donatus Aemilius Asper Aeschylus Aesop Giorgio Agamben Agapetus (deacon) Agathias James Agee Agnes of Bohemia Sigurd Agrell Johannes Agricola Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa A-ha Johann Rudolph Ahle Mirza Basheer-ud-Din Mahmood Ahmad Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Mirza Masroor Ahmad Kalevi Aho Helene Ahrweiler Ilse Aichinger Martti Aiha Roger Ailes César Aira Ivan Aivazovsky Amanda Aizpuriete Kazimierz Ajdukiewicz George Akerlof Anna Akhmatova George Akropolites Ivan Aksakov Marie-Claire Alain The Alan Parsons Project Pedro Antonio de Alarcón Alaric I Leopoldo Alas Edward Albee Isaac Albéniz Josef Albers Albert of Saxony (philosopher) Daniel M. Albert Marvin Albert Werner Andreas Albert Leon Battista Alberti Rafael Alberti Albertus Magnus Albinus (philosopher) René Albrecht-Carrié Gerd Albrecht Alcaeus of Mytilene Baltasar del Alcázar Andrea Alciato Alcinous (philosopher) Louisa May Alcott Alcuin Frances Alda David Alderton Brian Aldiss Cyril Aldred Bess Streeter Aldrich Buzz Aldrin Girolamo Aleandro, the younger Mira Alečković Philippe Alegambe Sholem Aleichem Jean le Rond d'Alembert Sibilla Aleramo Alberto Alesina Alessandro Alessandri Alexander I of Russia Alexander of Aphrodisias Alexander the Great Alexandra Feodorovna (Alix of Hesse) Svetlana Alexievich Constantine John Alexopoulos Vittorio Alfieri Andreas Alföldi Géza Alföldy Alfonso X of Castile Hannes Alfvén Hugo Alfvén Ali Ali ibn Husayn Zayn al-Abidin Monica Ali Muhammad Ali (writer) Salim Ali Alice Cooper (band) Alice's Adventures in Wonderland Aljafería Leo Allatius Donald Allchin Lily Allen Nicholas Allen (anthropologist) Thomas Allen (baritone) Thomas B. Allen (author) Isabel Allende Allergy Svetlana Alliluyeva Jerry Allison Samuel King Allison Manuel d'Almeida Trindade Alphaville (band) Alphius Avitus Joseph Alsop Marin Alsop Philip Alston William Alston Anne L. Alstott Philip Altbach Albrecht Altdorfer Erhard Altdorfer Peter Altenberg Karen Alter Nathan Alterman Paul Althaus Louis Althusser Francesco Altimari Arthur Altman Robert Altman Luigi Alva Manuel Alvar Corrado Alvaro Rubem Alves Alexander Alyabyev Jorge Amado Candido Amantini Lucine Amara Amarnath Amarasingam Giuliano Amato B. R. Ambedkar (previous page) (next page) Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Wikipedia_articles_with_NSK_identifiers&oldid=847591786" Categories: Pages with NSK identifiers Wikipedia articles with authority control information Hidden categories: Hidden categories Tracking categories Template Large category TOC via CatAutoTOC on category with 5,001–10,000 pages CatAutoTOC generates Large category TOC Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Category Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Afrikaans Български 한국어 Ilokano עברית Bahasa Melayu 日本語 Română Sardu Scots සිංහල Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Türkçe 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 26 June 2018, at 13:03 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2203 ---- Ut pictura poesis - Wikipedia Ut pictura poesis From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Ut Pictura Poesis, by Charles François Hutin Ut pictura poesis is a Latin phrase literally meaning "as is painting so is poetry". The statement (often repeated) occurs most famously in Horace's "Ars Poetica", near the end, immediately after another famous quotation, "bonus dormitat Homerus", or "even Homer nods" (an indication that even the most skilled poet can compose inferior verse): Poetry resembles painting. Some works will captivate you when you stand very close to them and others if you are at a greater distance. This one prefers a darker vantage point, that one wants to be seen in the light since it feels no terror before the penetrating judgment of the critic. This pleases only once, that will give pleasure even if we go back to it ten times over.[1] Horace meant that poetry (in its widest sense, "imaginative texts") merited the same careful interpretation that was, in Horace's day, reserved for painting. Some centuries before, Simonides of Keos (c. 556 – 468 BC) had stated, "Poema pictura loquens, pictura poema silens," which translates into, "Poetry is a speaking picture, painting a silent poetry."[2] Yet, as this phrase has traversed history, it has ignited academic arguments over whether or not it is true. Plato, through his own thought process on credible knowledge, found painting and writing to be unreliable sources of understanding, disregarding the concept entirely. The lack of credibility rested on his opinion that both forms of art gave a false simulation of reality. Moving on from Plato's time to the Renaissance, the argument sprung up over which form was superior. It was decided, at this time, that painting took precedence because sight was higher-ranking to people than hearing was.[3] Gotthold Ephraim Lessing opens his Laocoön: An Essay on the Limits of Painting and Poetry (1766) by observing that "the first who compared painting with poetry [Simonides of Ceos] was a man of fine feeling,"[4] though, Lessing makes it clear, not a critic or philosopher. Lessing argues that painting is a synchronic, visual phenomenon, one of space that is immediately in its entirety understood and appreciated, while poetry (again, in its widest sense) is a diachronic art of the ear, one that depends on time to unfold itself for the reader's appreciation. He recommends that poetry and painting should not be confused, and that they are best practiced and appreciated "as two equitable and friendly neighbors."[citation needed] W. J. T. Mitchell trenchantly observed that "We tend to think that to compare poetry with painting is to make a metaphor, while to differentiate poetry from painting is to state a literal truth."[5] The paragone was another long-running debate, typically rather more competitive, comparing painting and sculpture. Alexander Pope[edit] 18th-century British poet Alexander Pope was partial to ut pictura poesis. He considered both painting and poetry to be equals, and "it can easily be seen that he held that there was a close relationship between the art of poetry and the art of painting, especially perhaps since such a relationship combined the two arts of which he was a practitioner."[6] There is note of Pope finding himself "in a larger context of a continuous line of poetic pictorialism".[6] Ut pictura poesis surfaces in regards to Pope's "Rape of the Lock" through his in-depth descriptions of the characters and plot. Rebecca Ferguson, in her essay "'Quick as her Eyes, and as unfix'd as those': objectification and seeing in Pope's 'Rape of the Lock'", draws attention to these details, specifically with Belinda’s character. Ferguson explains an aspect of how Pope was painting a character and a plot: "Pope's construction of Belinda seems to render her just such a 'frontier' between a constructive and a destructive chaos, between qualities which are 'neither inside nor outside', neither invested in her 'essential' self nor in her body," and The belle is identified in many ways with the display of vessels and treasures around her, both as a consumer and as a figure who takes on some of the properties of those riches, yet her attractions are in the end not so much displayed as set in motion; she 'rises in her charms', 'awakens' and 'calls forth' her wonders and graces, culminating in the dispersal of both her body and her allure in the reader's eye.[7] There is an emphasis on the reader's eye and the imagery that contributed to audience members being able to so vividly 'watch' the plot of this poem unfold. Notes[edit] ^ Golden, Leon (2010). "Reception of Horace's Ars Poetica". In Davis, Gregson (ed.). A Companion to Horace. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. p. 400. ISBN 978-1-4051-5540-3. ^ "Ut Pictura Poesis". ^ "Ut Pictura Poesis". ^ Simonides, who wrote "poema pictura locguens, pictura poema silens" (poetry is a speaking picture, painting a silent [mute] poetry) was quoted by Plutarch, De gloria Atheniensium 3.346f. ^ Iconology: Image, Text, Ideology (University of Chicago Press, 1986) page 49 ^ a b Williams, Robert W. (1983–1984). "Alexander Pope and Ut Pictura Poesis". Sydney Studies in English. 9: 61–75 – via MLA International Bibliography. ^ Ferguson, Rebecca (1992). "Quick as her Eyes, and as unfix'd as those': objectification and seeing in Pope's "Rape of the Lock"". Critical Survey. 4: 14–146. References[edit] Rensselaer, W. Lee (1967). Ut Pictura Poesis: The humanistic theory of painting. New York: Norton. archive.org v t e Works by Horace Poetry Satires Epodes Odes Epistles Carmen Saeculare Ars Poetica Collections Satires 2.5 Quote Ut pictura poesis Related Spring of Bandusium Authority control LCCN: sh85141581 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ut_pictura_poesis&oldid=993815029" Categories: Horace Literary theory Visual arts theory Hidden categories: Articles containing Latin-language text All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from December 2010 Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Català Deutsch Español Français Italiano 日本語 Polski Edit links This page was last edited on 12 December 2020, at 17:12 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2214 ---- Clothing in ancient Rome - Wikipedia Clothing in ancient Rome From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Clothing style in ancient Rome. Statue of the Emperor Tiberius showing the draped toga of the 1st century AD Clothing in ancient Rome generally comprised a short-sleeved or sleeveless, knee-length tunic for men and boys, and a longer, usually sleeved tunic for women and girls. On formal occasions, adult male citizens could wear a woolen toga, draped over their tunic, and married citizen women wore a woolen mantle, known as a palla, over a stola, a simple, long-sleeved, voluminous garment that hung to midstep. Clothing, footwear and accoutrements identified gender, status, rank and social class. This was especially apparent in the distinctive, privileged official dress of magistrates, priesthoods and the military. The toga was considered Rome's "national costume," but for day-to-day activities most Romans preferred more casual, practical and comfortable clothing; the tunic, in various forms, was the basic garment for all classes, both sexes and most occupations. It was usually made of linen, and was augmented as necessary with underwear, or with various kinds of cold-or-wet weather wear, such as knee-breeches for men, and cloaks, coats and hats. In colder parts of the empire, full length trousers were worn. Most urban Romans wore shoes, slippers, boots or sandals of various types; in the countryside, some wore clogs. Most clothing was simple in structure and basic form, and its production required minimal cutting and tailoring, but all was produced by hand and every process required skill, knowledge and time. Spinning and weaving were thought virtuous, frugal occupations for Roman women of all classes. Wealthy matrons, including Augustus' wife Livia, might show their traditionalist values by producing home-spun clothing, but most men and women who could afford it bought their clothing from specialist artisans. The manufacture and trade of clothing and the supply of its raw materials made an important contribution to Rome's economy. Relative to the overall basic cost of living, even simple clothing was expensive, and was recycled many times down the social scale. Rome's governing elite produced laws designed to limit public displays of personal wealth and luxury. None were particularly successful, as the same wealthy elite had an appetite for luxurious and fashionable clothing. Exotic fabrics were available, at a price; silk damasks, translucent gauzes, cloth of gold, and intricate embroideries; and vivid, expensive dyes such as saffron yellow or Tyrian purple. Not all dyes were costly, however, and most Romans wore colourful clothing. Clean, bright clothing was a mark of respectability and status among all social classes. The fastenings and brooches used to secure garments such as cloaks provided further opportunities for personal embellishment and display. Contents 1 Tunics and undergarments 2 Formal wear for citizens 2.1 Toga 2.2 Stola and palla 3 Freedmen, freedwomen and slaves 4 Children and adolescents 5 Footwear 6 Military costume 7 Religious offices and ceremonies 8 Roman clothing of Late Antiquity (after 284 AD) 9 Fabrics 9.1 Animal fibres 9.1.1 Wool 9.1.2 Silk 9.2 Plant fibres 9.2.1 Linen 9.2.2 Other plant fibres 10 Manufacture 11 Colours and dyes 12 Leather and hide 13 Laundering and fulling 14 See also 15 References 16 Cited sources Tunics and undergarments 4th-century mosaic from Villa del Casale, Sicily, showing "bikini girls" in an athletic contest The basic garment for both genders and all classes was the tunica (tunic). In its simplest form, the tunic was a single rectangle of woven fabric, originally woolen, but from the mid-republic onward, increasingly made from linen. It was sewn into a wide, sleeveless tubular shape and pinned around the shoulders like a Greek chiton, to form openings for the neck and arms. In some examples from the eastern part of the empire, neck openings were created in the weaving. Sleeves could be added, or formed in situ from the excess width. Most working men wore knee-length, short-sleeved tunics, secured at the waist with a belt. Some traditionalists considered long sleeved tunics appropriate only for women, very long tunics on men as a sign of effeminacy, and short or unbelted tunics as marks of servility; nevertheless, very long-sleeved, loosely belted tunics were also fashionably unconventional and were adopted by some Roman men; for example, by Julius Caesar. Women's tunics were usually ankle or foot-length, long-sleeved, and could be worn loosely or belted.[1] For comfort and protection from cold, both sexes could wear a soft under-tunic or vest (subucula) beneath a coarser over-tunic; in winter, the Emperor Augustus, whose physique and constitution were never particularly robust, wore up to four tunics, over a vest.[2] Although essentially simple in basic design, tunics could also be luxurious in their fabric, colours and detailing.[3] Loincloths, known as subligacula or subligaria could be worn under a tunic. They could also be worn on their own, particularly by slaves who engaged in hot, sweaty or dirty work. Women wore both loincloth and strophium (a breast cloth) under their tunics; and some wore tailored underwear for work or leisure.[4] A 4th-century AD Sicillian mosaic shows several "bikini girls" performing athletic feats; in 1953 a Roman leather bikini bottom was excavated from a well in London. Formal wear for citizens The Orator, c. 100 BC, an Etrusco-Roman bronze sculpture depicting Aule Metele (Latin: Aulus Metellus), an Etruscan man of Roman senatorial rank, engaging in rhetoric. He wears senatorial shoes, and a toga praetexta of "skimpy" (exigua) Republican type.[5] The statue features an inscription in the Etruscan alphabet Silenus holding a lyre (left); demi-god Pan and a nymph sitting on a rock, nursing a goat (centre); woman with coat (right); fresco from the Villa of the Mysteries, Pompeii, Italy, c. 50 BC Roman society was graded into several citizen and non-citizen classes and ranks, ruled by a powerful minority of wealthy, landowning citizen-aristocrats. Even the lowest grade of citizenship carried certain privileges denied to non-citizens, such as the right to vote for representation in government. In tradition and law, an individual's place in the citizen-hierarchy – or outside it – should be immediately evident in their clothing. The seating arrangements at theatres and games enforced this idealised social order, with varying degrees of success. In literature and poetry, Romans were the gens togata ("togate race"), descended from a tough, virile, intrinsically noble peasantry of hard-working, toga-wearing men and women. The toga's origins are uncertain; it may have begun as a simple, practical work-garment and blanket for peasants and herdsmen. It eventually became formal wear for male citizens; at much the same time, respectable female citizens adopted the stola. The morals, wealth and reputation of citizens were subject to official scrutiny. Male citizens who failed to meet a minimum standard could be demoted in rank, and denied the right to wear a toga; by the same token, female citizens could be denied the stola. Respectable citizens of either sex might thus be distinguished from freedmen, foreigners, slaves and infamous persons.[6] Toga Main article: Toga The toga virilis ("toga of manhood") was a semi-elliptical, white woolen cloth some 6 feet in width and 12 feet in length, draped across the shoulders and around the body. It was usually worn over a plain white linen tunic. A commoner's toga virilis was a natural off-white; the senatorial version was more voluminous, and brighter. The toga praetexta of curule magistrates and some priesthoods added a wide purple edging, and was worn over a tunic with two vertical purple stripes. It could also be worn by noble and freeborn boys and girls, and represented their protection under civil and divine law. Equites wore the trabea (a shorter, "equestrian" form of white toga or a purple-red wrap, or both) over a white tunic with two narrow vertical purple-red stripes. The toga pulla, used for mourning, was made of dark wool. The rare, prestigious toga picta and tunica palmata were purple, embroidered with gold. They were originally awarded to Roman generals for the day of their triumph, but became official dress for emperors and Imperial consuls. From at least the late Republic onward, the upper classes favoured ever longer and larger togas, increasingly unsuited to manual work or physically active leisure. Togas were expensive, heavy, hot and sweaty, hard to keep clean, costly to launder and challenging to wear correctly. They were best suited to stately processions, oratory, sitting in the theatre or circus, and self-display among peers and inferiors while "ostentatiously doing nothing" at salutationes.[7] These early morning, formal "greeting sessions" were an essential part of Roman life, in which clients visited their patrons, competing for favours or investment in business ventures. A client who dressed well and correctly – in his toga, if a citizen – showed respect for himself and his patron, and might stand out among the crowd. A canny patron might equip his entire family, his friends, freedmen, even his slaves, with elegant, costly and impractical clothing, implying his entire extended family's condition as one of "honorific leisure" (otium), buoyed by limitless wealth.[8] The vast majority of citizens had to work for a living, and avoided wearing the toga whenever possible.[9][10] Several emperors tried to compel its use as the public dress of true Romanitas but none were particularly successful.[11] The aristocracy clung to it as a mark of their prestige, but eventually abandoned it for the more comfortable and practical pallium. Stola and palla Roman marble torso from the 1st century AD, showing a woman's clothing Besides tunics, married citizen women wore a simple garment known as a stola (pl. stolae) which was associated with traditional Roman female virtues, especially modesty.[12] In the early Roman Republic, the stola was reserved for patrician women. Shortly before the Second Punic War, the right to wear it was extended to plebeian matrons, and to freedwomen who had acquired the status of matron through marriage to a citizen. Stolae typically comprised two rectangular segments of cloth joined at the side by fibulae and buttons in a manner allowing the garment to be draped in elegant but concealing folds.[13] Over the stola, citizen-women often wore the palla, a sort of rectangular shawl up to 11 feet long, and five wide. It could be worn as a coat, or draped over the left shoulder, under the right arm, and then over the left arm. Outdoors and in public, a chaste matron's hair was bound up in woolen bands (fillets, or vitae) in a high-piled style known as tutulus. Her face was concealed from the public, male gaze with a veil; her palla could also serve as a hooded cloak.[14][15] Two ancient literary sources mention use of a coloured strip or edging (a limbus) on a woman's "mantle", or on the hem of their tunic; probably a mark of their high status, and presumably purple.[16] Outside the confines of their homes, matrons were expected to wear veils; a matron who appeared without a veil was held to have repudiated her marriage.[17] High-caste women convicted of adultery, and high-class female prostitutes (meretrices), were not only forbidden public use of the stola, but might have been expected to wear a toga muliebris (a "woman's toga") as a sign of their infamy.[18][19] Freedmen, freedwomen and slaves For citizens, salutationes meant wearing the toga appropriate to their rank.[20] For freedmen, it meant whatever dress disclosed their status and wealth; a man should be what he seemed, and low rank was no bar to making money. Freedmen were forbidden to wear any kind of toga. Elite invective mocked the aspirations of wealthy, upwardly mobile freedmen who boldly flouted this prohibition, donned a toga, or even the trabea of an equites, and inserted themselves as equals among their social superiors at the games and theatres. If detected, they were evicted from their seats.[21] Notwithstanding the commonplace snobbery and mockery of their social superiors, some freedmen and freedwomen were highly cultured, and most would have had useful personal and business connections through their former master. Those with an aptitude for business could amass a fortune; and many did. They could function as patrons in their own right, fund public and private projects, own grand town-houses, and "dress to impress".[22][23] There was no standard costume for slaves; they might dress well, badly, or barely at all, depending on circumstance and the will of their owner. Urban slaves in prosperous households might wear some form of livery; cultured slaves who served as household tutors might be indistinguishable from well-off freedmen. Slaves serving out in the mines might wear nothing. For Appian, a slave dressed as well as his master signalled the end of a stable, well-ordered society. According to Seneca, tutor to Nero, a proposal that all slaves be made to wear a particular type of clothing was abandoned, for fear that the slaves should realise both their own overwhelming numbers, and the vulnerability of their masters. Advice to farm-owners by Cato the Elder and Columella on the regular supply of adequate clothing to farm-slaves was probably intended to mollify their otherwise harsh conditions, and maintain their obedience.[24][25][26] Children and adolescents Roman infants were usually swaddled. Apart from those few, typically formal garments reserved for adults, most children wore a scaled-down version of what their parents wore. Girls often wore a long tunic that reached the foot or instep, belted at the waist and very simply decorated, most often white. Outdoors, they might wear another tunic over it. Boys' tunics were shorter. Boys and girls wore amulets to protect them from immoral or baleful influences such as the evil eye and sexual predation. For boys, the amulet was a bulla, worn around the neck; the equivalent for girls was a crescent-shaped lunula. The toga praetexta, which was thought to offer similar apotropaic protection, was formal wear for freeborn boys until puberty, when they gave their toga praetexta and childhood bulla into the care of their family lares and put on the adult male's toga virilis. According to some Roman literary sources, freeborn girls might also wear – or at least, had the right to wear – a toga praetexta until marriage, when they offered their childhood toys, and perhaps their maidenly praetexta to Fortuna Virginalis; others claim a gift made to the family Lares, or to Venus, as part of their passage to adulthood. In traditionalist families, unmarried girls might be expected to wear their hair demurely bound in a fillet.[27][28] Notwithstanding such attempts to protect the maidenly virtue of Roman girls, there is little anecdotal or artistic evidence of their use or effective imposition. Some unmarried daughters of respectable families seem to have enjoyed going out and about in flashy clothing, jewellery, perfume and make-up;[29] and some parents, anxious to find the best and wealthiest possible match for their daughters, seem to have encouraged it.[30] Footwear Left image: The goddess Diana hunting in the forest with a bow, and wearing the high-laced open "Hellenistic shoe-boots" associated with deities, and some images of very high status Romans. From a fresco in the Via Livenza Hypogeum, Rome, c. 350 AD Right image: Detail of the "Big Game Hunt" mosaic from the Villa Romana del Casale (4th century AD), Roman Sicily, showing hunters shod in calceii, wearing vari-coloured tunics and protective leggings Romans used a wide variety of practical and decorative footwear, all of it flat soled (without heels). Outdoor shoes were often hobnailed for grip and durability.[31] The most common types of footwear were a one-piece shoe (carbatina), sometimes with semi-openwork uppers; a usually thin-soled sandal (solea), secured with thongs; a laced, soft half-shoe (soccus); a usually hobnailed, thick-soled walking shoe (calcea); and a heavy-duty, hobnailed standard-issue military marching boot (caliga). Thick-soled wooden clogs, with leather uppers, were available for use in wet weather, and by rustics and field-slaves[32] Archaeology has revealed many more unstandardised footwear patterns and variants in use over the existence of the Roman Empire. For the wealthy, shoemakers employed sophisticated strapwork, delicate cutting, dyes and even gold leaf to create intricate decorative patterns. Indoors, most reasonably well-off Romans of both sexes wore slippers or light shoes of felt or leather.[32] Brides on their wedding-day may have worn distinctively orange-coloured light soft shoes or slippers (lutei socci).[33] Public protocol required red ankle boots for senators, and shoes with crescent-shaped buckles for equites, though some wore Greek-style sandals to "go with the crowd".[34][35] Costly footwear was a mark of wealth or status, but being completely unshod need not be a mark of poverty. Cato the younger showed his impeccable Republican morality by going publicly barefoot; many images of the Roman gods, and later, statues of the semi-divine Augustus, were unshod.[36][37] Fashions in footwear reflected changes in social conditions. For example, during the unstable middle Imperial era, the military was overtly favoured as the true basis for power; at around this time, a tough, heavy, so-called "Gallic sandal" – up to 4 inches broad at the toe – developed as outdoor wear for men and boys, reminiscent of the military boot. Meanwhile, outdoor footwear for women, young girls and children remained elegantly pointed at the toe.[32] Military costume Main article: Ancient Roman military clothing Levy of the army during the taking of the Roman census, detail from the marble-sculpted Altar of Domitius Ahenobarbus, 122–115 BC, showing two Polybian-era soldiers (pedites) wearing chain mail and wielding a gladius and scutum, opposite an aristocratic cavalryman (eques) Marble statue of Mars from the Forum of Nerva, wearing a plumed Corinthian helmet and muscle cuirass, 2nd century AD For the most part, common soldiers seem to have dressed in belted, knee-length tunics for work or leisure. In the northern provinces, the traditionally short sleeved tunic might be replaced by a warmer, long-sleeved version. Soldiers on active duty wore short trousers under a military kilt, sometimes with a leather jerkin or felt padding to cushion their armour, and a triangular scarf tucked in at the neck.[4] For added protection from wind and weather, they could wear the sagum, a heavy-duty cloak also worn by civilians. According to Roman tradition, soldiers had once worn togas to war, hitching them up with what was known as a "Gabine cinch"; but by the mid-Republican era, this was only used for sacrificial rites and a formal declaration of war.[38] Thereafter, citizen-soldiers wore togas only for formal occasions. Cicero's "sagum-wearing" soldiers versus "toga-wearing" civilians are rhetorical and literary trope, referring to a wished-for transition from military might to peaceful, civil authority.[39][40] When on duty in the city, the Praetorian guard concealed their weapons beneath their white "civilian" togas.[41] The sagum distinguished common soldiers from the highest ranking commanders, who wore a larger, purple-red cloak, the paludamentum.[42] The colour of the ranker's sagum is uncertain.[43] Roman military clothing was probably less uniform and more adaptive to local conditions and supplies than is suggested by its idealised depictions in contemporary literature, statuary and monuments.[44] Nevertheless, Rome's levies abroad were supposed to represent Rome in her purest form; provincials were supposed to adopt Roman ways, not vice versa. Even when foreign garments – such as full-length trousers – proved more practical than standard issue, soldiers and commanders who used them were viewed with disdain and alarm by their more conservative compatriots, for undermining Rome's military virtus by "going native".[45][46] This did not prevent their adoption. In the late 3rd century the distinctive Pannonian "pill-box" hat became firstly a popular, and then a standard item of legionary fatigues.[47] In Mediterranean climates, soldiers typically wore hobnailed "open boots" (caligae). In colder and wetter climates, an enclosing "shoeboot" was preferred.[48] Some of the Vindolanda tablets mention the despatch of clothing – including cloaks, socks, and warm underwear – by families to their relatives, serving at Brittania's northern frontier.[49] During the early and middle Republican era, conscripted soldiers and their officers were expected to provide or pay for all their personal equipment. From the late republic onwards, they were salaried professionals, and bought their own clothing from legionary stores, quartermasters or civilian contractors. Military needs were prioritised. Clothing was expensive to start with, and the military demand was high; this inevitably pushed up prices, and a common soldier's clothing expenses could be more than a third of his annual pay. In the rampant inflation of the later Imperial era, as currency and salaries were devalued, deductions from military salaries for clothing and other staples were replaced by payments in kind, leaving common soldiers cash-poor, but adequately clothed.[50] Religious offices and ceremonies Most priesthoods were reserved to high status, male Roman citizens, usually magistrates or ex-magistrates. Most traditional religious rites required that the priest wore a toga praetexta, in a manner described as capite velato (head covered [by a fold of the toga]) when performing augury, reciting prayers or supervising at sacrifices.[51] Where a rite prescribed the free use of both arms, the priest could employ the cinctus Gabinus ("Gabine cinch") to tie back the toga's inconvenient folds.[52] Roman statue of a Virgo Vestalis Maxima (Senior Vestal) The Vestal Virgins tended Rome's sacred fire, in Vesta's temple, and prepared essential sacrificial materials employed by different cults of the Roman state. They were highly respected, and possessed unique rights and privileges; their persons were sacred and inviolate. Their presence was required at various religious and civil rites and ceremonies. Their costume was predominantly white, woolen, and had elements in common with high-status Roman bridal dress. They wore a white, priestly infula, a white suffibulum (veil) and a white palla, with red ribbons to symbolise their devotion to Vesta's sacred fire, and white ribbons as a mark of their purity.[53] Statue of a Gallus priest, 2nd century, Musei Capitolini The Flamen priesthood was dedicated to various deities of the Roman state. They wore a close-fitting, rounded cap (Apex) topped with a spike of olive-wood; and the laena, a long, semi-circular "flame-coloured" cloak fastened at the shoulder with a brooch or fibula. Their senior was the Flamen dialis, who was the high priest of Jupiter and was married to the Flamenica dialis. He was not allowed to divorce, leave the city, ride a horse, touch iron, or see a corpse. The laena was thought to predate the toga.[54] The twelve Salii ("leaping priests" of Mars) were young patrician men, who processed through the city in a form of war-dance during the festival of Mars, singing the Carmen Saliare. They too wore the apex, but otherwise dressed as archaic warriors, in embroidered tunics and breastplates. Each carried a sword, wore a short, red military cloak (paludamentum) and ritually struck a bronze shield, whose ancient original was said to have fallen from heaven.[55] Rome recruited many non-native deities, cults and priesthoods as protectors and allies of the state. Aesculapius, Apollo, Ceres and Proserpina were worshiped using the so-called "Greek rite", which employed Greek priestly dress, or a Romanised version of it. The priest presided in Greek fashion, with his head bare or wreathed.[56] In 204 BC, the Galli priesthood were brought to Rome from Phrygia, to serve the "Trojan" Mother Goddess Cybele and her consort Attis on behalf of the Roman state. They were legally protected but flamboyantly "un-Roman". They were eunuchs, and told fortunes for money; their public rites were wild, frenzied and bloody, and their priestly garb was "womanly". They wore long, flowing robes of yellow silk, extravagant jewellery, perfume and make-up, and turbans or exotic versions of the "phrygian" hat over long, bleached hair.[57][58] Roman clothing of Late Antiquity (after 284 AD) Roman fashions underwent very gradual change from the late Republic to the end of the Western empire, 600 years later.[59] In part, this reflects the expansion of Rome's empire, and the adoption of provincial fashions perceived as attractively exotic, or simply more practical than traditional forms of dress. Changes in fashion also reflect the increasing dominance of a military elite within government, and a corresponding reduction in the value and status of traditional civil offices and ranks. In the later empire after Diocletian's reforms, clothing worn by soldiers and non-military government bureaucrats became highly decorated, with woven or embellished strips, clavi, and circular roundels, orbiculi, added to tunics and cloaks. These decorative elements usually comprised geometrical patterns and stylised plant motifs, but could include human or animal figures.[60] The use of silk also increased steadily and most courtiers in late antiquity wore elaborate silk robes. Heavy military-style belts were worn by bureaucrats as well as soldiers, revealing the general militarization of late Roman government. Trousers — considered barbarous garments worn by Germans and Persians — achieved only limited popularity in the latter days of the empire, and were regarded by conservatives as a sign of cultural decay.[61] The toga, traditionally seen as the sign of true Romanitas, had never been popular or practical. Most likely, its official replacement in the East by the more comfortable pallium and paenula simply acknowledged its disuse.[62] In early medieval Europe, kings and aristocrats dressed like the late Roman generals they sought to emulate, not like the older toga-clad senatorial tradition.[63] Fabrics An elaborately-designed golden fibula (brooch) with the Latin inscription "VTERE FELIX" ("use [this] with luck"), late 3rd century AD, from the Osztropataka Vandal burial site Animal fibres Wool Wool was the most commonly used fibre in Roman clothing. The sheep of Tarentum were renowned for the quality of their wool, although the Romans never ceased trying to optimise the quality of wool through cross-breeding. Miletus in Asia Minor and the province of Gallia Belgica were also renowned for the quality of their wool exports, the latter producing a heavy, rough wool suitable for winter.[64] For most garments, white wool was preferred; it could then be further bleached, or dyed. Naturally dark wool was used for the toga pulla and work garments subjected to dirt and stains.[65] In the provinces, private landowners and the State held large tracts of grazing land, where large numbers of sheep were raised and sheared. Their wool was processed and woven in dedicated manufactories. Britannia was noted for its woolen products, which included a kind of duffel coat (the Birrus Brittanicus), fine carpets, and felt linings for army helmets.[66] Silk Further information: Sino-Roman relations and Indo-Roman trade relations A maenad wearing a silk gown, a Roman fresco from the Casa del Naviglio in Pompeii, 1st century AD Silk from China was imported in significant quantities as early as the 3rd century BC. It was bought in its raw state by Roman traders at the Phoenician ports of Tyre and Beirut, then woven and dyed.[64] As Roman weaving techniques developed, silk yarn was used to make geometrically or freely figured damask, tabbies and tapestry. Some of these silk fabrics were extremely fine – around 50 threads or more per centimeter. Production of such highly decorative, costly fabrics seems to have been a speciality of weavers in the eastern Roman provinces, where the earliest Roman horizontal looms were developed.[67] Various sumptuary laws and price controls were passed to limit the purchase and use of silk. In the early Empire the Senate passed legislation forbidding the wearing of silk by men because it was viewed as effeminate[68] but there was also a connotation of immorality or immodesty attached to women who wore the material,[69] as illustrated by Seneca the Elder: "I can see clothes of silk, if materials that do not hide the body, nor even one's decency, can be called clothes... Wretched flocks of maids labour so that the adulteress may be visible through her thin dress, so that her husband has no more acquaintance than any outsider or foreigner with his wife's body." (Declamations Vol. 1) The Emperor Aurelian is said to have forbidden his wife to buy a mantle of Tyrian purple silk. The Historia Augusta claims that the emperor Elagabalus was the first Roman to wear garments of pure silk (holoserica) as opposed to the usual silk/cotton blends (subserica); this is presented as further evidence of his notorious decadence.[64][70] Moral dimensions aside, Roman importation and expenditure on silk represented a significant, inflationary drain on Rome's gold and silver coinage, to the benefit of foreign traders and loss to the empire. Diocletian's Edict on Maximum Prices of 301 AD set the price of one kilo of raw silk at 4,000 gold coins.[64] Wild silk, cocoons collected from the wild after the insect had eaten its way out, was also known;[71] being of shorter, smaller lengths, its fibres had to be spun into somewhat thicker yarn than the cultivated variety. A rare luxury cloth with a beautiful golden sheen, known as sea silk, was made from the long silky filaments or byssus produced by Pinna nobilis, a large Mediterranean clam.[72] Plant fibres Linen Pliny the Elder describes the production of linen from flax and hemp. After harvesting, the plant stems were retted to loosen the outer layers and internal fibres, stripped, pounded and then smoothed. Following this, the materials were woven. Flax, like wool, came in various speciality grades and qualities. In Pliny's opinion, the whitest (and best) was imported from Spanish Saetabis; at double the price, the strongest and most long-lasting was from Retovium. The whitest and softest was produced in Latium, Falerii and Paelignium. Natural linen was a "greyish brown" that faded to off-white through repeated laundering and exposure to sunlight. It did not readily absorb the dyes in use at the time, and was generally bleached, or used in its raw, undyed state.[73] Other plant fibres Cotton from India was imported through the same Eastern Mediterranean ports that supplied Roman traders with silk and spices.[64] Raw cotton was sometimes used for padding. Once its seeds were removed, cotton could be spun, then woven into a soft, lightweight fabric appropriate for summer use; cotton was more comfortable than wool, less costly than silk, and unlike linen, it could be brightly dyed; for this reason, cotton and linen were sometimes interwoven to produce vividly coloured, soft but tough fabric.[74] High quality fabrics were also woven from nettle stems; poppy-stem fibre was sometimes interwoven with flax, to produce a glossy smooth, lightweight and luxuriant fabric. Preparation of such stem fibres involved similar techniques to those used for linen.[75] Manufacture Ready-made clothing was available for all classes, at a price; the cost of a new cloak for an ordinary commoner might represent three fifths of their annual subsistence expenses. Clothing was left to heirs and loyal servants in wills, and changed hands as part of marriage settlements. High quality clothing could be hired out to the less-well-off who needed to make a good impression. Clothing was a target in some street robberies, and in thefts from the public baths;[76] it was re-sold and recycled down the social scale, until it fell to rags; even these were useful, and centonarii ("patch-workers") made a living by sewing clothing and other items from recycled fabric patches.[77] Owners of slave-run farms and sheep-flocks were advised that whenever the opportunity arose, female slaves should be fully occupied in the production of homespun woolen cloth; this would likely be good enough for clothing the better class of slave or supervisor.[78] Self-sufficiency in clothing paid off. The carding, combing, spinning and weaving of wool were part of daily housekeeping for most women. Those of middling or low income could supplement their personal or family income by spinning and selling yarn, or by weaving fabric for sale. In traditionalist, wealthy households, the family's wool-baskets, spindles and looms were positioned in the semi-public reception area (atrium), where the mater familias and her familia could thus demonstrate their industry and frugality; a largely symbolic and moral activity for those of their class, rather than practical necessity.[79] Augustus was particularly proud that his wife and daughter had set the best possible example to other Roman women by spinning and weaving his clothing.[80] High-caste brides were expected to make their own wedding garments, using a traditional vertical loom.[81] Most fabric and clothing was produced by professionals whose trades, standards and specialities were protected by guilds; these in turn were recognised and regulated by local authorities.[82] Pieces were woven as closely as possible to their intended final shape, with minimal waste, cutting and sewing thereafter. Once a woven piece of fabric was removed from the loom, its loose end-threads were tied off, and left as a decorative fringe, hemmed, or used to add differently coloured "Etruscan style" borders, as in the purple-red border of the toga praetexta, and the vertical coloured stripe of some tunics;[82] a technique known as "tablet weaving".[83] Weaving on an upright, hand-powered loom was a slow process. The earliest evidence for the transition from vertical to more efficient horizontal, foot-powered looms comes from Egypt, around 298 AD.[84] Even then, the lack of mechanical aids in spinning made yarn production a major bottleneck in the manufacture of cloth. Colours and dyes From Rome's earliest days, a wide variety of colours and coloured fabrics would have been available; in Roman tradition, the first association of professional dyers dated back to the days of King Numa. Roman dyers would certainly have had access to the same locally produced, usually plant-based dyes as their neighbours on the Italian peninsula, producing various shades of red, yellow, blue, green, and brown; blacks could be achieved using iron salts and oak gall. Other dyes, or dyed cloths, could have been obtained by trade, or through experimentation. For the very few who could afford it, cloth-of-gold (lamé) was almost certainly available, possibly as early as the 7th century BC.[85] Throughout the Regal, Republican and Imperial eras, the fastest, most expensive and sought-after dye was imported Tyrian purple, obtained from the murex. Its hues varied according to processing, the most desirable being a dark "dried-blood" red.[86] Purple had long-standing associations with regality, and with the divine. It was thought to sanctify and protect those who wore it, and was officially reserved for the border of the toga praetexta, and for the solid purple toga picta. Edicts against its wider, more casual use were not particularly successful; it was also used by wealthy women and, somewhat more disreputably, by some men.[87][88] Verres is reported as wearing a purple pallium at all-night parties, not long before his trial, disgrace and exile for corruption. For those who could not afford genuine Tyrian purple, counterfeits were available.[89] The expansion of trade networks during the early Imperial era brought the dark blue of Indian indigo to Rome; though desirable and costly in itself, it also served as a base for fake Tyrian purple.[90] For red hues, madder was one of the cheapest dyes available. Saffron yellow was much admired, but costly. It was a deep, bright and fiery yellow-orange, and was associated with purity and constancy. It was used for the flammeum (meaning "flame-coloured"), a veil used by Roman brides and the Flamenica Dialis, who was virgin at marriage and forbidden to divorce.[91] Specific colours were associated with chariot-racing teams and their supporters. The oldest of these were the Reds and the Whites. During the later Imperial era, the Blues and Greens dominated chariot-racing and, up to a point, civil and political life in Rome and Constantinople. Although the teams and their supporters had official recognition, their rivalry sometimes spilled into civil violence and riot, both within and beyond the circus venue.[92] Leather and hide The Romans had two methods of converting animal skins to leather: tanning produced a soft, supple brown leather; tawing in alum and salt produced a soft, pale leather that readily absorbed dyes. Both these processes produced a strong, unpleasant odour, so tanners’ and tawers’ shops were usually placed well away from urban centres. Unprocessed animal hides were supplied directly to tanners by butchers, as a byproduct of meat production; some was turned to rawhide, which made a durable shoe-sole. Landowners and livestock ranchers, many of whom were of the elite class, drew a proportion of profits at each step of the process that turned their animals into leather or hide and distributed it through empire-wide trade networks. The Roman military consumed large quantities of leather; for jerkins, belts, boots, saddles, harness and strap-work, but mostly for military tents.[93][94] Laundering and fulling Workers hanging up clothing to dry, wall painting from a fuller's shop (fullonica) at Pompeii The almost universal habit of public bathing ensured that most Romans kept their bodies at least visually clean, but dirt, spillage, staining and sheer wear of garments were constant hazards to the smart, clean appearance valued by both the elite and non-elite leisured classes, particularly in an urban setting.[95] Most Romans lived in apartment blocks with no facilities for washing or finishing clothes on any but the smallest scale. Professional laundries and fuller's shops (fullonicae, singular fullonica) were highly malodorous but essential and commonplace features of every city and town. Small fulling enterprises could be found at local market-places; others operated on an industrial scale, and would have required a considerable investment of money and manpower, especially slaves.[96] Basic laundering and fulling techniques were simple, and labour-intensive. Garments were placed in large tubs containing aged urine, then well trodden by bare-footed workers. They were well-rinsed, manually or mechanically wrung, and spread over wicker frames to dry. Whites could be further brightened by bleaching with sulphur fumes. Some colours could be restored to brightness by "polishing" or "refinishing" with Cimolian earth (the basic fulling process). Others were less colour-fast, and would have required separate laundering. In the best-equipped establishments, garments were further smoothed under pressure, using screw-presses and stretching frames.[97] Laundering and fulling were punishingly harsh to fabrics, but were evidently thought to be worth the effort and cost. The high-quality woolen togas of the senatorial class were intensively laundered to an exceptional, snowy white, using the best and most expensive ingredients. Lower ranking citizens used togas of duller wool, more cheaply laundered; for reasons that remain unclear, the clothing of different status groups might have been laundered separately.[98] Front of house, fullonicae were run by enterprising citizens of lower social class, or by freedmen and freedwomen; behind the scenes, their enterprise might be supported discreetly by a rich or elite patron, in return for a share of the profits.[96] The Roman elite seem to have despised the fulling and laundering professions as ignoble; though perhaps no more than they despised all manual trades. The fullers themselves evidently thought theirs a respectable and highly profitable profession, worth celebration and illustration in murals and memorials.[99] Pompeian mural paintings of launderers and fullers at work show garments in a rainbow variety of colours, but not white; fullers seem to have been particularly valued for their ability to launder dyed garments without loss of colour, sheen or "brightness", rather than merely whitening, or bleaching.[100] New woolen cloth and clothing may also have been laundered; the process would have partially felted and strengthened woolen fabrics, and raised the softer nap.[101] See also Wikimedia Commons has media related to Ancient Roman fashion. Clothing in the ancient world Biblical clothing Byzantine dress Clothing in ancient Greece Ancient Roman military clothing Roman jewelry References ^ Heskel, J., p. 134 in Sebesta ^ Suetonius, Augustus, 82 ^ Sebesta, J. L., pp. 71–72 in Sebesta ^ a b Goldman, N., pp. 223 and 233 in Sebesta ^ Ceccarelli, L. (2016) p. 33 in Bell, S., and Carpino, A. A. (eds) A Companion to the Etruscans. Blackwell Publishing. ISBN 978-1-118-35274-8 ^ Edmondson, J. C., p. 25 in Edmondson ^ Braund, Susanna, and Osgood, Josiah, eds. (2012) A Companion to Persius and Juvenal, Wiley-Blackwell, p. 79. ISBN 978-1-4051-9965-0 ^ Braund, Susanna, and Osgood, Josiah eds. (2012) A Companion to Persius and Juvenal, Wiley-Blackwell. p. 65. ISBN 978-1-4051-9965-0 ^ Vout, pp. 205–208 ^ cf. the description of Roman clothing, including the toga, as "simple and elegant, practical and comfortable" by Goldman, B., p. 217 in Sebesta ^ Edmondson, J. C., p. 96 in Edmondson ^ Harlow, M.E. ‘Dressing to please themselves: clothing choices for Roman Women’ in Harlow, M.E. (ed.) Dress and identity (University of Birmingham IAA Interdisciplinary Series: Studies in Archaeology, History, Literature and Art 2), 2012, Archaeopress, pp. 39 ^ Sebesta, J. L., pp. 48–50 in Sebesta ^ Roman Clothing, Part II. Vroma.org. Retrieved on 2012-07-25. ^ Goldman, N., p. 228 in Sebesta ^ Sebesta, J. L., pp. 67, 245 in Sebesta: citing Nonius M 541, Servius, In Aeneadem, 2.616, 4.137 ^ Sebesta, J. L., p. 49 in Sebesta ^ Edwards, Catharine (1997) "Unspeakable Professions: Public Performance and Prostitution in Ancient Rome", pp. 81–82 in Roman Sexualities. Princeton University Press. ISBN 9780691011783 ^ Vout, pp. 205–208, 215, citing Servius, In Aenidem, 1.281 and Nonius, 14.867L for the former wearing of togas by women other than prostitutes and adulteresses. Some modern scholars doubt the "togate adulteress" as more than literary and social invective: cf Dixon, J., in Harlow, M., and Nosch, M-L., (Editors) Greek and Roman Textiles and Dress: An Interdisciplinary Anthology, Oxbow Books, 2014, pp. 298–304. Some, on similar grounds, doubt both the "togate adulteress" and the "togate meretrix": see Knapp, Robert, Invisible Romans, Profile Books, 2013, pp. 256 – 257, citing Horace, Satires 1.2.63, 82., and Sulpicia (in Tibullus, Elegies, 3.16.3 – 4) ^ Vout, p. 216 ^ Edmondson, J., pp. 31–34 in Edmondson ^ Clarke, John R. (1992) The Houses of Roman Italy, 100 BC-AD 250. Ritual, Space and Decoration. University Presses of California, Columbia and Princeton. p. 4. ISBN 9780520084292 ^ For more general discussion see Wilson, A., and Flohr, M. eds. (2016) Urban Craftsmen and Traders in the Roman World. Oxford University Press. pp. 101–110. ISBN 9780191811104 ^ Bradley, Keith R. (1988). "Roman Slavery and Roman Law". Historical Reflections. 15 (3): 477–495. JSTOR 23232665. ^ Appian Civil Wars, 2.120; Seneca, On Mercy, 1. 24. 1 ^ Bradley, Keith R. (1987) Slaves and Masters in the Roman Empire: A Study in Social Control. Oxford University Press. pp. 21–23. ISBN 978-0195206074 ^ Hersch, Karen K. (2010) The Roman Wedding: Ritual and Meaning in Antiquity. Cambridge University Press. pp. 66–67. ISBN 9780521124270 ^ Sebesta, J. L., p. 47 in Sebesta ^ Olson, Kelly (2008) Dress and the Roman Woman: Self-Presentation and Society. Routledge. pp. 16–20. ISBN 9780415414760 ^ Olson, Kelly, pp. 143–149 in Edmondson ^ Croom, Alexandra (2010). Roman Clothing and Fashion. The Hill, Stroud, Gloucestershire: Amberley Publishing. ISBN 978-1-84868-977-0. ^ a b c Goldman, N., pp. 105–113 in Sebesta ^ Stone, S., in Edmondson, J. C., p. 27 in Edmondson; see also Colours and dyes in this article. ^ Shumba, L., in Edmondson, J. C., and Keith, A., (Editors), Roman Dress and the Fabrics of Roman Culture, University of Toronto Press, 2008, p. 191 ^ Edmonson, J. C., pp. 45–47 and note 75 in Edmondson ^ Stone, S., p. 16 in Sebesta ^ Stout, A. M., p. 93 in Sebesta: the gods needed no footwear, having "no need to touch the ground" ^ Stone, S., p. 13 in Sebesta ^ Phang, pp. 82–83 ^ Duggan, John, Making a New Man: Ciceronian Self-Fashioning in the Rhetorical Works, Oxford University Press, 2005, pp. 61–65, citing Cicero's Ad Pisonem (Against Piso). ^ Phang, pp. 77–78 ^ Sebesta, pp. 133, 191 ^ Its modern recreation as an intense red, or indeed any shade of red, is based on slender, unreliable literary evidence; see Phang, pp. 82–83 ^ The columns of Trajan and Marcus Aurelius represent such idealised forms of military clothing and armour. ^ Phang, pp. 94–95 ^ Erdkamp, pp. 237, 541 ^ Vegetius, On Military Matters, 1. 20 ^ Goldman, N., pp. 122, 125 in Sebesta ^ Bowman, Alan K (1994) Life and Letters on the Roman Frontier, British Museum Press. pp. 45–46, 71–72. ISBN 9780415920247 ^ Erdkamp, pp. 81, 83, 310–312 ^ Palmer, Robert (1996) "The Deconstruction of Mommsen on Festus 462/464, or the Hazards of Interpretation", p. 83 in Imperium sine fine: T. Robert S. Broughton and the Roman Republic. Franz Steiner. ISBN 9783515069489 ^ Scheid, John (2003) An Introduction to Roman Religion. Indiana University Press, p. 80. ISBN 9780253216601 ^ Wildfang, R. L. (2006) Rome's Vestal Virgins: A Study of Rome's Vestal Priestesses in the Late Republic and Early Empire, Routledge, p. 54. ISBN 9780415397964 ^ Goldman, N., pp. 229–230 in Sebesta ^ Smith, William; Wayte, William and Marindin, G. E. (1890). A Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities. Albemarle Street, London. John Murray. ^ Robert Schilling, "Roman Sacrifice", Roman and European Mythologies (University of Chicago Press, 1992), p. 78. ^ Beard, Mary (1994) "The Roman and the Foreign: The Cult of the "Great Mother" in Imperial Rome", pp. 164–190 in Thomas, N., and Humphrey, C., (eds) Shamanism, History and the State, Anne Arbor, The University of Michigan Press. ISBN 9780472084012 ^ Vermaseren, Maarten J. (1977) Cybele and Attis: the myth and the cult, translated by A. M. H. Lemmers, London: Thames and Hudson. pp. 96–97, 115. ISBN 978-0500250549 ^ Rodgers, p. 490 ^ Sumner, Graham (2003). Roman Military clothing (2) AD 200 to 400. Osprey Publishing. pp. 7–9. ISBN 1841765597. ^ Rodgers, p. 491 ^ Vout, pp. 212–213 ^ Wickham, Chris. The Inheritance of Rome, Penguin Books, 2009, ISBN 978-0-670-02098-0 p. 106 ^ a b c d e Gabucci, Ada (2005). Dictionaries of Civilization: Rome. University of California Press. p. 168. ^ Sebesta, J. L., p. 66 in Sebesta ^ Wild, J. P. (1967). "Soft-finished Textiles in Roman Britain". The Classical Quarterly. 17 (1): 133–135. doi:10.1017/S0009838800010405. JSTOR 637772. ^ Wild, J. P. (1987). "The Roman Horizontal Loom". American Journal of Archaeology. 91 (3): 459–471. doi:10.2307/505366. JSTOR 505366. ^ Whitfield, Susan (1999) Life Along the Silk Road, Berkeley University of California Press. p. 21. ISBN 0-520-23214-3. ^ "Chinese Silk in the Roman Empire" (PDF). www.saylor.org. p. 1. ^ Historia Augusta Vita Heliogabali. p. XXVI.1. ^ Pliny Nat.His XI, 75–77 ^ "The project Sea-silk – Rediscovering an Ancient Textile Material." Archaeological Textiles Newsletter, Number 35, Autumn 2002, p. 10. ^ Sebesta, J. L., pp. 66, 72 in Sebesta ^ Sebesta, J. L., pp. 68–72 in Sebesta ^ Stone, S., p. 39, and note 9 in Sebesta, citing Pliny the Elder, Natural History, 8.74.195 ^ Croom, pp. 28-29, citing Tibullus 1.2.26; the story of the Good Samaritan in Luke 10.30; and Juvenal, Satires 6.352 for rental of clothing ^ Vout, pp. 211, 212. ^ The notoriously parsimonious Cato the Elder, in his De Agri Cultura, 57, advises that slaves on farming estates be given a cloak and tunic every two years. Columella gives similar advice, adding that while homespun would likely be "too good" for the lowest class of rustic slave, it would not be good enough for their masters; but cf Augustus' pride in his "homespun" clothes. Sebesta, J. L., p. 70 in Sebesta, citing Columella, 12, praef. 9–10, 12.3.6 ^ In reality, she was the female equivalent of the romanticised citizen-farmer: Flower, pp. 153, 195–197 ^ Flower, pp. 153–154, citing Suetonius, Life of Augustus, 73 ^ Sebesta, J. L., pp. 55–61 in Sebesta ^ a b Goldman, B., p. 221 in Sebesta ^ Meyers, G. E. (2016) p. 331 in Bell, S., and Carpino, A. A. (eds) A Companion to the Etruscans. Blackwell Publishing. ISBN 978-1-118-35274-8 ^ Carroll, D.L. (1985). "Dating the foot-powered loom: the Coptic evidence". American Journal of Archaeology. 89 (1): 168–73. doi:10.2307/504781. JSTOR 504781. ^ Sebesta, J. L., pp. 62–68 in Sebesta ^ Bradley, Mark (2011) Colour and Meaning in Ancient Rome. Cambridge University Press. pp. 189, 194–195. ISBN 978-0521291224 ^ Edmonson, J. C., pp. 28–30 and note 75 in Edmondson ^ Keith, A., in Edmonson, J. C., and Keith, A., (Editors), Roman Dress and the Fabrics of Roman Culture, University of Toronto Press, 2008, p. 200 ^ Sebesta, J., L., pp. 54–56 in Sebesta ^ Sebesta, J. L., pp. 68–69 in Sebesta, citing Pliny the Elder, Natural History, 33.163, 35.43, 35.46, 37.84, and Vitruvius, On architecture, 7.9.8, 7.14; as indigo was imported as "bricks" of dye-powder, Vitruvius believed it a mineral. ^ La Follette, L., pp. 54–56 in Sebesta ^ Sebesta, J. L., pp. 70–71 in Sebesta ^ Goldman, N., pp. 104–106 in Sebesta ^ Erdkamp, pp. 316, 327 ^ Bradley, Mark, "'It all comes out in the wash’: Looking harder at the Roman fullonica," Journal of Roman Archaeology, 2002, pp. 21-24. ^ a b Flohr, pp. 31–34, 68–72 ^ Flohr, pp. 57–65, 144–148 ^ Flower, pp. 168–169 ^ Flohr, pp. 2, 31–34 ^ Flohr, p. 61 ^ Flohr, pp. 31–34 Cited sources Croom, Alexandra (2010). Roman Clothing and Fashion. The Hill, Stroud, Gloucestershire: Amberley Publishing. ISBN 978-1-84868-977-0. Edmondson, J.C.; Keith, Alison, eds. (2008). Roman Dress and the Fabrics of Roman Culture. University of Toronto Press. ISBN 9780802093196. Erdkamp, Paul, ed. (2007). A Companion to the Roman Army. Blackwell Publishing. ISBN 978-1444339215. Flohr, Miko (2013). The World of the Fullo: Work, Economy, and Society in Roman Italy. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0199659357. Flower, Harriet I. (2004). The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Republic. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-00390-2. Phang, Sar Elise (2008). Roman Military Service: Ideologies of Discipline in the Late Republic and Early Principate. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9781139468886. Rodgers, Nigel (2007). The Illustrated Encyclopedia of the Roman Empire. Lorenz Books. ISBN 978-0-7548-1911-0. Sebesta, Judith Lynn; Bonfante, Larissa, eds. (1994). The World of Roman Costume: Wisconsin Studies in Classics. The University of Wisconsin Press. ISBN 9780299138509. Vout, Caroline (1996). "The Myth of the Toga: Understanding the History of Roman Dress". Greece & Rome. 43 (2): 204–220. doi:10.1093/gr/43.2.204. JSTOR 643096. v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films v t e Timeline of clothing and fashion Ancient Egyptian Biblical Greek Roman Indian Chinese Middle Ages Anglo-Saxon Byzantine English Europe 400s–1000s 1100s 1200s 1300s 1400s Japanese Korean Ottoman 1500s–1820s Western fashion 1500–1550 1550–1600 1600–1650 1650–1700 1700–1750 1750–1775 1775–1795 1795–1820 Directoire style 1820s 1830s–1910s Western fashion Victorian 1830s 1840s 1850s 1860s 1870s 1880s 1890s Edwardian 1900s 1910s 1920s–1990s 1920s 1930–1945 1945–1959 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000–present 2000s 2010s Authority control LCCN: sh2003012054 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Clothing_in_ancient_Rome&oldid=995879131" Categories: History of clothing Roman-era clothing Hidden categories: Articles with short description Short description matches Wikidata Wikipedia indefinitely semi-protected pages Use dmy dates from November 2013 Articles containing Latin-language text Commons category link is on Wikidata Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read View source View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Languages Català Čeština Español Français Italiano Lingua Franca Nova Magyar 日本語 Português Русский Simple English Српски / srpski Svenska Українська Edit links This page was last edited on 23 December 2020, at 10:54 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2193 ---- Age of Enlightenment - Wikipedia Age of Enlightenment From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search European cultural movement of the 17th, 18th, and 19th centuries "Age of reason" redirects here. For other uses, see Age of reason (disambiguation). Reading of Voltaire's tragedy of the Orphan of China in the salon of Marie Thérèse Rodet Geoffrin, by Lemonnier.[note 1] History of Western philosophy The School of Athens fresco by Raphael Western philosophy By era Ancient Medieval Renaissance Modern early modern late modern Contemporary By century 16th 17th 18th 19th 20th 21st See also Religious philosophy Buddhist Christian Hindu Islamic Jain Jewish Sikh Eastern philosophy Chinese Indian Iranian Japanese Korean Western culture Western world v t e Part of a series on Classicism Classical antiquity Greco-Roman world Age of Enlightenment Neoclassicism Economics Music Physics 20th-century neoclassicism Between World War I and II Ballet Economics Music Philosophy v t e Part of a series on Capitalism Concepts Business Business cycle Businessperson Capital Capital accumulation Capital markets Capitalist mode of production Company Corporation Competitive markets Economic interventionism Economic liberalism Economic surplus Entrepreneurship Fictitious capital Financial market Free price system Free market Goods and services Investor Invisible hand Liberalization Marginalism Money Private property Privatization Profit Rent seeking Supply and demand Surplus value Value Wage labour Economic systems Anglo-Saxon Authoritarian Corporate Dirigist Free-market Humanistic Laissez-faire Liberal Libertarian Market Mercantilist Mixed Monopoly National Neoliberal Nordic Private Raw Regulated market Regulatory Rhine Social State State-sponsored Welfare Economic theories American Austrian Chartalism MMT Chicago Classical Institutional Keynesian Neo- New Post- Marxian Monetarist Neoclassical New institutional Supply-side Origins Age of Enlightenment Capitalism and Islam Commercial Revolution Feudalism Industrial Revolution Mercantilism Primitive accumulation Physiocracy Simple commodity production Development Advanced Consumer Community Corporate Crony Finance Global Illiberal Late Marxist Merchant Progressive Rentier State monopoly Techno People Adam Smith John Stuart Mill David Ricardo Thomas Robert Malthus Jean-Baptiste Say Karl Marx Milton Friedman Friedrich Hayek John Maynard Keynes Alfred Marshall Ludwig von Mises Ayn Rand Murray Rothbard Joseph Schumpeter Thorstein Veblen Max Weber Ronald Coase Related topics Anti-capitalism Capitalist state Consumerism Crisis theory Criticism of capitalism Cronyism Culture of capitalism Evergreening Exploitation Globalization History History of theory Market economy Periodizations of capitalism Perspectives on capitalism Post-capitalism Speculation Spontaneous order Venture philanthropy Wage slavery Ideologies Anarcho-capitalism Authoritarian capitalism Democratic capitalism Dirigism Eco-capitalism Humanistic capitalism Inclusive capitalism Liberal capitalism Liberalism Libertarian capitalism Neo-capitalism Neoliberalism Objectivism Ordoliberalism Right-libertarianism Third Way  Capitalism portal  Business portal  Philosophy portal  Politics portal  Money portal v t e Part of a series on Liberalism History Age of Enlightenment List of liberal theorists (contributions to liberal theory) Ideas Civil and political rights Cultural liberalism Democracy Democratic capitalism Economic freedom Economic liberalism Egalitarianism Free market Free trade Freedom of the press Freedom of religion Freedom of speech Gender equality Harm principle Internationalism Laissez-faire Liberty Market economy Natural and legal rights Negative/positive liberty Non-aggression Principle Open society Permissive society Private property Rule of law Secularism Separation of church and state Social contract Welfare state Schools of thought Anarcho-capitalism Classical liberalism Radical liberalism Left-libertarianism Geolibertarianism Right-libertarianism Conservative liberalism Democratic liberalism Green liberalism Liberal autocracy Liberal Catholicism Liberal conservatism Liberal feminism Equity feminism Liberal internationalism Liberal nationalism Liberal socialism Social democracy Muscular liberalism Neoliberalism National liberalism Ordoliberalism Radical centrism Religious liberalism Christian Islamic Jewish Secular liberalism Social liberalism Technoliberalism Third Way Whiggism People Acton Alain Alberdi Alembert Arnold Aron Badawi Barante Bastiat Bentham Berlin Beveridge Bobbio Brentano Bright Broglie Burke Čapek Cassirer Chicherin Chu Chydenius Clinton Cobden Collingdood Condorcet Constant Croce Cuoco Dahrendorf Decy Dewey Dickens Diderot Dongsun Dunoyer Dworkin Einaudi Emerson Eötvös Flach Friedman Galbraith Garrison George Gladstone Gobetti Gomes Gray Green Gu Guizot Hayek Herbert Hobbes Hobhouse Hobson Holbach Hu Humboldt Jefferson Jubani Kant Kelsen Kemal Keynes Korais Korwin-Mikke Kymlicka Lamartine Larra Lecky Li Lincoln Locke Lufti Macaulay Madariaga Madison Martineau Masani Michelet Mill (father) Mill (son) Milton Mises Molteno Mommsen Money Montalembert Montesquieu Mora Mouffe Naoroji Naumann Nozick Nussbaum Obama Ohlin Ortega Paine Paton Popper Price Priestley Prieto Quesnay Qin Ramírez Rathenau Rawls Raz Renan Renouvier Renzi Ricardo Röpke Rorthy Rosmini Rosselli Rousseau Ruggiero Sarmiento Say Sen Earl of Shaftesbury Shklar Sidney Sieyès Şinasi Sismondi Smith Soto Polar Spencer Spinoza Staël Sumner Tahtawi Tao Thierry Thorbecke Thoreau Tocqueville Tracy Troeltsch Turgot Villemain Voltaire Ward Weber Wollstonecraft Zambrano Organizations Africa Liberal Network Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Party Arab Liberal Federation Council of Asian Liberals and Democrats European Democratic Party European Liberal Youth European Party for Individual Liberty International Alliance of Libertarian Parties International Federation of Liberal Youth Liberal International Liberal Network for Latin America Liberal parties Liberal South East European Network Regional variants Europe Latin America Albania Armenia Australia Austria Belgium Bolivia Brazil Bulgaria Canada China Chile Colombia Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech lands Denmark Ecuador Egypt Estonia Finland France Georgia Germany Greece Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Iran Israel Italy Japan Latvia Lithuania Luxembourg Macedonia Mexico Moldova Montenegro Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Nigeria Norway Panama Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Romania Russia Senegal Serbia Slovakia Slovenia Spain South Africa South Korea Sweden Switzerland Thailand Tunisia Turkey Ukraine United Kingdom United States Arizona School Classical Modern Uruguay Venezuela Zimbabwe Related topics Bias in academia Bias in the media  Liberalism portal  Politics portal v t e The Age of Enlightenment (also known as the Age of Reason or simply the Enlightenment)[1][note 2] was an intellectual and philosophical movement that dominated the world of ideas in Europe during the 17th and 18th centuries.[3] The Enlightenment emerged out of a European intellectual and scholarly movement known as Renaissance humanism and was also preceded by the Scientific Revolution and the work of Francis Bacon, among others. Some date the beginning of the Enlightenment to René Descartes' 1637 philosophy of Cogito, ergo sum ("I think, therefore I Am"), while others cite the publication of Isaac Newton's Principia Mathematica (1687) as the culmination of the Scientific Revolution and the beginning of the Enlightenment. French historians traditionally date its beginning with the death of Louis XIV of France in 1715 until the 1789 outbreak of the French Revolution. Most end it with the beginning of the 19th century. Philosophers and scientists of the period widely circulated their ideas through meetings at scientific academies, Masonic lodges, literary salons, coffeehouses and in printed books, journals, and pamphlets. The ideas of the Enlightenment undermined the authority of the monarchy and the Catholic Church and paved the way for the political revolutions of the 18th and 19th centuries. A variety of 19th-century movements, including liberalism and neoclassicism, trace their intellectual heritage to the Enlightenment.[4] The Enlightenment included a range of ideas centered on the sovereignty of reason and the evidence of the senses as the primary sources of knowledge and advanced ideals such as liberty, progress, toleration, fraternity, constitutional government and separation of church and state.[5][6] In France, the central doctrines of the Enlightenment philosophers were individual liberty and religious tolerance, in opposition to an absolute monarchy and the fixed dogmas of the Church. The Enlightenment was marked by an emphasis on the scientific method and reductionism, along with increased questioning of religious orthodoxy—an attitude captured by Immanuel Kant's essay Answering the Question: What is Enlightenment, where the phrase Sapere aude (Dare to know) can be found.[7] Contents 1 Significant people and publications 2 Philosophy 3 Science 4 Sociology, economics and law 5 Politics 5.1 Theories of government 5.2 Enlightened absolutism 5.3 French Revolution 6 Religion 6.1 Separation of church and state 7 National variations 7.1 Great Britain 7.1.1 England 7.1.2 Scotland 7.1.3 Anglo-American colonies 7.2 German states 7.3 Italy 7.4 Spain and Spanish America 7.5 Portugal 7.6 Russia 7.7 Poland 8 Historiography 8.1 Definition 8.2 Time span 8.3 Modern study 9 Society and culture 9.1 Social and cultural implications in the arts 10 Dissemination of ideas 10.1 The Republic of Letters 10.2 The book industry 10.3 Natural history 10.4 Scientific and literary journals 10.5 Encyclopedias and dictionaries 10.6 Popularization of science 10.7 Schools and universities 10.8 Learned academies 10.9 Salons 10.10 Coffeehouses 10.11 Debating societies 10.12 Masonic lodges 10.13 Art 11 Important intellectuals 12 See also 13 Notes 14 References 14.1 Citations 14.2 Sources 15 Further reading 15.1 Reference and surveys 15.2 Specialty studies 15.3 Primary sources 16 External links Significant people and publications The most famous work by Nicholas de Condorcet, Esquisse d'un tableau historique des progres de l'esprit humain, 1795.[8] With the publication of this book, the development of the Age of Enlightenment is considered generally ended.[9] The Age of Enlightenment was preceded by and closely associated with the Scientific Revolution.[10] Earlier philosophers whose work influenced the Enlightenment included Francis Bacon and René Descartes.[11] Some of the major figures of the Enlightenment included Cesare Beccaria, Denis Diderot, David Hume, Immanuel Kant, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, John Locke, Montesquieu, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Adam Smith, Hugo Grotius, Baruch Spinoza, and Voltaire.[12] One particularly influential Enlightenment publication was the Encyclopédie (Encyclopedia). Published between 1751 and 1772 in thirty-five volumes, it was compiled by Denis Diderot, Jean le Rond d'Alembert, and a team of 150 other intellectuals. The Encyclopédie helped in spreading the ideas of the Enlightenment across Europe and beyond.[13] Other landmark publications of the Enlightenment included Voltaire's Letters on the English (1733) and Dictionnaire philosophique (Philosophical Dictionary; 1764); Hume's A Treatise of Human Nature (1740); Montesquieu's The Spirit of the Laws (1748); Rousseau's Discourse on Inequality (1754) and The Social Contract (1762); Adam Smith's The Theory of Moral Sentiments (1759) and The Wealth of Nations (1776); and Kant's Critique of Pure Reason (1781). Enlightenment thought was deeply influential in the political realm. European rulers such as Catherine II of Russia, Joseph II of Austria and Frederick II of Prussia tried to apply Enlightenment thought on religious and political tolerance, which became known as enlightened absolutism.[12] Many of the main political and intellectual figures behind the American Revolution associated themselves closely with the Enlightenment: Benjamin Franklin visited Europe repeatedly and contributed actively to the scientific and political debates there and brought the newest ideas back to Philadelphia; Thomas Jefferson closely followed European ideas and later incorporated some of the ideals of the Enlightenment into the Declaration of Independence; and James Madison incorporated these ideals into the United States Constitution during its framing in 1787.[14] The ideas of the Enlightenment also played a major role in inspiring the French Revolution, which began in 1789. Philosophy René Descartes' rationalist philosophy laid the foundation for enlightenment thinking. His attempt to construct the sciences on a secure metaphysical foundation was not as successful as his method of doubt applied in philosophic areas leading to a dualistic doctrine of mind and matter. His skepticism was refined by John Locke's Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1690) and David Hume's writings in the 1740s. His dualism was challenged by Spinoza's uncompromising assertion of the unity of matter in his Tractatus (1670) and Ethics (1677). According to Jonathan Israel, these laid down two distinct lines of Enlightenment thought: first, the moderate variety, following Descartes, Locke and Christian Wolff, which sought accommodation between reform and the traditional systems of power and faith, and second, the radical enlightenment, inspired by the philosophy of Spinoza, advocating democracy, individual liberty, freedom of expression and eradication of religious authority.[15][16] The moderate variety tended to be deistic, whereas the radical tendency separated the basis of morality entirely from theology. Both lines of thought were eventually opposed by a conservative Counter-Enlightenment, which sought a return to faith.[17] German philosopher Immanuel Kant In the mid-18th century, Paris became the center of philosophic and scientific activity challenging traditional doctrines and dogmas. The philosophical movement was led by Voltaire and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, who argued for a society based upon reason as in ancient Greece[18] rather than faith and Catholic doctrine, for a new civil order based on natural law, and for science based on experiments and observation. The political philosopher Montesquieu introduced the idea of a separation of powers in a government, a concept which was enthusiastically adopted by the authors of the United States Constitution. While the Philosophes of the French Enlightenment were not revolutionaries and many were members of the nobility, their ideas played an important part in undermining the legitimacy of the Old Regime and shaping the French Revolution.[19] Francis Hutcheson, a moral philosopher, described the utilitarian and consequentialist principle that virtue is that which provides, in his words, "the greatest happiness for the greatest numbers". Much of what is incorporated in the scientific method (the nature of knowledge, evidence, experience and causation) and some modern attitudes towards the relationship between science and religion were developed by his protégés David Hume and Adam Smith.[20] Hume became a major figure in the skeptical philosophical and empiricist traditions of philosophy. Immanuel Kant (1724–1804) tried to reconcile rationalism and religious belief, individual freedom and political authority, as well as map out a view of the public sphere through private and public reason.[21] Kant's work continued to shape German thought and indeed all of European philosophy, well into the 20th century.[22] Mary Wollstonecraft was one of England's earliest feminist philosophers.[23] She argued for a society based on reason and that women as well as men should be treated as rational beings. She is best known for her work A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (1791).[24] Science Main article: Science in the Age of Enlightenment Science played an important role in Enlightenment discourse and thought. Many Enlightenment writers and thinkers had backgrounds in the sciences and associated scientific advancement with the overthrow of religion and traditional authority in favour of the development of free speech and thought. Scientific progress during the Enlightenment included the discovery of carbon dioxide (fixed air) by the chemist Joseph Black, the argument for deep time by the geologist James Hutton and the invention of the condensing steam engine by James Watt.[25] The experiments of Lavoisier were used to create the first modern chemical plants in Paris and the experiments of the Montgolfier Brothers enabled them to launch the first manned flight in a hot-air balloon on 21 November 1783 from the Château de la Muette, near the Bois de Boulogne.[26] The wide-ranging contributions to mathematics of Leonhard Euler (1707–1783) included major results in analysis, number theory, topology, combinatorics, graph theory, algebra, and geometry (among other fields). In applied mathematics, he made fundamental contributions to mechanics, hydraulics, acoustics, optics, and astronomy. He was based in the Imperial Academy of Sciences in St. Petersburg (1727–1741), then in Berlin at the Royal Prussian Academy of Sciences and Belles Lettres (1741–1766), and finally back in St. Petersburg at the Imperial Academy (1766–1783).[27] Broadly speaking, Enlightenment science greatly valued empiricism and rational thought and was embedded with the Enlightenment ideal of advancement and progress. The study of science, under the heading of natural philosophy, was divided into physics and a conglomerate grouping of chemistry and natural history, which included anatomy, biology, geology, mineralogy and zoology.[28] As with most Enlightenment views, the benefits of science were not seen universally: Rousseau criticized the sciences for distancing man from nature and not operating to make people happier.[29] Science during the Enlightenment was dominated by scientific societies and academies, which had largely replaced universities as centres of scientific research and development. Societies and academies were also the backbone of the maturation of the scientific profession. Another important development was the popularization of science among an increasingly literate population. Philosophes introduced the public to many scientific theories, most notably through the Encyclopédie and the popularization of Newtonianism by Voltaire and Émilie du Châtelet. Some historians have marked the 18th century as a drab period in the history of science.[30] However, the century saw significant advancements in the practice of medicine, mathematics and physics; the development of biological taxonomy; a new understanding of magnetism and electricity; and the maturation of chemistry as a discipline, which established the foundations of modern chemistry. Scientific academies and societies grew out of the Scientific Revolution as the creators of scientific knowledge in contrast to the scholasticism of the university.[31] During the Enlightenment, some societies created or retained links to universities, but contemporary sources distinguished universities from scientific societies by claiming that the university's utility was in the transmission of knowledge while societies functioned to create knowledge.[32] As the role of universities in institutionalized science began to diminish, learned societies became the cornerstone of organized science. Official scientific societies were chartered by the state in order to provide technical expertise.[33] Most societies were granted permission to oversee their own publications, control the election of new members and the administration of the society.[34] After 1700, a tremendous number of official academies and societies were founded in Europe and by 1789 there were over seventy official scientific societies. In reference to this growth, Bernard de Fontenelle coined the term "the Age of Academies" to describe the 18th century.[35] The influence of science also began appearing more commonly in poetry and literature during the Enlightenment. Some poetry became infused with scientific metaphor and imagery, while other poems were written directly about scientific topics. Sir Richard Blackmore committed the Newtonian system to verse in Creation, a Philosophical Poem in Seven Books (1712). After Newton's death in 1727, poems were composed in his honour for decades.[36] James Thomson (1700–1748) penned his "Poem to the Memory of Newton", which mourned the loss of Newton, but also praised his science and legacy.[37] Sociology, economics and law Cesare Beccaria, father of classical criminal theory (1738–1794) Hume and other Scottish Enlightenment thinkers developed a "science of man",[38] which was expressed historically in works by authors including James Burnett, Adam Ferguson, John Millar and William Robertson, all of whom merged a scientific study of how humans behaved in ancient and primitive cultures with a strong awareness of the determining forces of modernity. Modern sociology largely originated from this movement[39] and Hume's philosophical concepts that directly influenced James Madison (and thus the U.S. Constitution) and as popularised by Dugald Stewart, would be the basis of classical liberalism.[40] In 1776, Adam Smith published The Wealth of Nations, often considered the first work on modern economics as it had an immediate impact on British economic policy that continues into the 21st century.[41] It was immediately preceded and influenced by Anne-Robert-Jacques Turgot, Baron de Laune drafts of Reflections on the Formation and Distribution of Wealth (Paris, 1766). Smith acknowledged indebtedness and possibly was the original English translator.[42] Cesare Beccaria, a jurist, criminologist, philosopher and politician and one of the great Enlightenment writers, became famous for his masterpiece Of Crimes and Punishments (1764), later translated into 22 languages,[43] which condemned torture and the death penalty and was a founding work in the field of penology and the Classical School of criminology by promoting criminal justice. Another prominent intellectual was Francesco Mario Pagano, who wrote important studies such as Saggi Politici (Political Essays, 1783), one of the major works of the Enlightenment in Naples; and Considerazioni sul processo criminale (Considerations on the criminal trial, 1787), which established him as an international authority on criminal law.[44] Politics The Enlightenment has long been hailed as the foundation of modern Western political and intellectual culture.[45] The Enlightenment brought political modernization to the West, in terms of introducing democratic values and institutions and the creation of modern, liberal democracies. This thesis has been widely accepted by Anglophone scholars and has been reinforced by the large-scale studies by Robert Darnton, Roy Porter and most recently by Jonathan Israel.[46][47] Theories of government John Locke, one of the most influential Enlightenment thinkers,[48] based his governance philosophy in social contract theory, a subject that permeated Enlightenment political thought. The English philosopher Thomas Hobbes ushered in this new debate with his work Leviathan in 1651. Hobbes also developed some of the fundamentals of European liberal thought: the right of the individual; the natural equality of all men; the artificial character of the political order (which led to the later distinction between civil society and the state); the view that all legitimate political power must be "representative" and based on the consent of the people; and a liberal interpretation of law which leaves people free to do whatever the law does not explicitly forbid.[49] Like other Enlightenment philosophers, Rousseau was critical of the Atlantic slave trade[50] Both Locke and Rousseau developed social contract theories in Two Treatises of Government and Discourse on Inequality, respectively. While quite different works, Locke, Hobbes and Rousseau agreed that a social contract, in which the government's authority lies in the consent of the governed,[51] is necessary for man to live in civil society. Locke defines the state of nature as a condition in which humans are rational and follow natural law, in which all men are born equal and with the right to life, liberty and property. However, when one citizen breaks the Law of Nature both the transgressor and the victim enter into a state of war, from which it is virtually impossible to break free. Therefore, Locke said that individuals enter into civil society to protect their natural rights via an "unbiased judge" or common authority, such as courts, to appeal to. Contrastingly, Rousseau's conception relies on the supposition that "civil man" is corrupted, while "natural man" has no want he cannot fulfill himself. Natural man is only taken out of the state of nature when the inequality associated with private property is established.[52] Rousseau said that people join into civil society via the social contract to achieve unity while preserving individual freedom. This is embodied in the sovereignty of the general will, the moral and collective legislative body constituted by citizens. Locke is known for his statement that individuals have a right to "Life, Liberty and Property" and his belief that the natural right to property is derived from labor. Tutored by Locke, Anthony Ashley-Cooper, 3rd Earl of Shaftesbury wrote in 1706: "There is a mighty Light which spreads its self over the world especially in those two free Nations of England and Holland; on whom the Affairs of Europe now turn".[53] Locke's theory of natural rights has influenced many political documents, including the United States Declaration of Independence and the French National Constituent Assembly's Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen. The philosophes argued that the establishment of a contractual basis of rights would lead to the market mechanism and capitalism, the scientific method, religious tolerance and the organization of states into self-governing republics through democratic means. In this view, the tendency of the philosophes in particular to apply rationality to every problem is considered the essential change.[54] Although much of Enlightenment political thought was dominated by social contract theorists, both David Hume and Adam Ferguson criticized this camp. Hume's essay Of the Original Contract argues that governments derived from consent are rarely seen and civil government is grounded in a ruler's habitual authority and force. It is precisely because of the ruler's authority over-and-against the subject, that the subject tacitly consents and Hume says that the subjects would "never imagine that their consent made him sovereign", rather the authority did so.[55] Similarly, Ferguson did not believe citizens built the state, rather polities grew out of social development. In his 1767 An Essay on the History of Civil Society, Ferguson uses the four stages of progress, a theory that was very popular in Scotland at the time, to explain how humans advance from a hunting and gathering society to a commercial and civil society without "signing" a social contract. Both Rousseau's and Locke's social contract theories rest on the presupposition of natural rights, which are not a result of law or custom, but are things that all men have in pre-political societies and are therefore universal and inalienable. The most famous natural right formulation comes from John Locke in his Second Treatise, when he introduces the state of nature. For Locke, the law of nature is grounded on mutual security or the idea that one cannot infringe on another's natural rights, as every man is equal and has the same inalienable rights. These natural rights include perfect equality and freedom, as well as the right to preserve life and property. Locke also argued against slavery on the basis that enslaving oneself goes against the law of nature because one cannot surrender one's own rights: one's freedom is absolute and no-one can take it away. Additionally, Locke argues that one person cannot enslave another because it is morally reprehensible, although he introduces a caveat by saying that enslavement of a lawful captive in time of war would not go against one's natural rights. As a spill-over of the Enlightenment, nonsecular beliefs expressed first by Quakers and then by Protestant evangelicals in Britain and the United States emerged. To these groups, slavery became "repugnant to our religion" and a "crime in the sight of God."[56] These ideas added to those expressed by Enlightenment thinkers, leading many in Britain to believe that slavery was "not only morally wrong and economically inefficient, but also politically unwise."[57] As these notions gained more adherents, Britain was forced to end its participation in the slave trade. Enlightened absolutism Main article: Enlightened absolutism The Marquis of Pombal, as the head of the government of Portugal, implemented sweeping socio-economic reforms (abolished slavery, significantly weakened the Inquisition, created the basis for secular public schools and restructured the tax system) The leaders of the Enlightenment were not especially democratic, as they more often look to absolute monarchs as the key to imposing reforms designed by the intellectuals. Voltaire despised democracy and said the absolute monarch must be enlightened and must act as dictated by reason and justice – in other words, be a "philosopher-king".[58] Denmark's minister Johann Struensee, a social reformer, was publicly executed in 1772 In several nations, rulers welcomed leaders of the Enlightenment at court and asked them to help design laws and programs to reform the system, typically to build stronger states. These rulers are called "enlightened despots" by historians.[59] They included Frederick the Great of Prussia, Catherine the Great of Russia, Leopold II of Tuscany and Joseph II of Austria. Joseph was over-enthusiastic, announcing many reforms that had little support so that revolts broke out and his regime became a comedy of errors and nearly all his programs were reversed.[60] Senior ministers Pombal in Portugal and Johann Friedrich Struensee in Denmark also governed according to Enlightenment ideals. In Poland, the model constitution of 1791 expressed Enlightenment ideals, but was in effect for only one year before the nation was partitioned among its neighbors. More enduring were the cultural achievements, which created a nationalist spirit in Poland.[61] Frederick the Great, the king of Prussia from 1740 to 1786, saw himself as a leader of the Enlightenment and patronized philosophers and scientists at his court in Berlin. Voltaire, who had been imprisoned and maltreated by the French government, was eager to accept Frederick's invitation to live at his palace. Frederick explained: "My principal occupation is to combat ignorance and prejudice ... to enlighten minds, cultivate morality, and to make people as happy as it suits human nature, and as the means at my disposal permit".[62] French Revolution The Enlightenment has been frequently linked to the French Revolution of 1789. One view of the political changes that occurred during the Enlightenment is that the "consent of the governed" philosophy as delineated by Locke in Two Treatises of Government (1689) represented a paradigm shift from the old governance paradigm under feudalism known as the "divine right of kings". In this view, the revolutions of the late 1700s and early 1800s were caused by the fact that this governance paradigm shift often could not be resolved peacefully and therefore violent revolution was the result. Clearly a governance philosophy where the king was never wrong was in direct conflict with one whereby citizens by natural law had to consent to the acts and rulings of their government. Alexis de Tocqueville proposed the French Revolution as the inevitable result of the radical opposition created in the 18th century between the monarchy and the men of letters of the Enlightenment. These men of letters constituted a sort of "substitute aristocracy that was both all-powerful and without real power". This illusory power came from the rise of "public opinion", born when absolutist centralization removed the nobility and the bourgeoisie from the political sphere. The "literary politics" that resulted promoted a discourse of equality and was hence in fundamental opposition to the monarchical regime.[63] De Tocqueville "clearly designates  ... the cultural effects of transformation in the forms of the exercise of power".[64] Religion The French philosopher Voltaire argued for religious tolerance, saying that "It does not require great art, or magnificently trained eloquence, to prove that Christians should tolerate each other. I, however, am going further: I say that we should regard all men as our brothers. What? The Turk my brother? The Chinaman my brother? The Jew? The Siam? Yes, without doubt; are we not all children of the same father and creatures of the same God?"[65] Enlightenment era religious commentary was a response to the preceding century of religious conflict in Europe, especially the Thirty Years' War.[66] Theologians of the Enlightenment wanted to reform their faith to its generally non-confrontational roots and to limit the capacity for religious controversy to spill over into politics and warfare while still maintaining a true faith in God. For moderate Christians, this meant a return to simple Scripture. John Locke abandoned the corpus of theological commentary in favor of an "unprejudiced examination" of the Word of God alone. He determined the essence of Christianity to be a belief in Christ the redeemer and recommended avoiding more detailed debate.[67] In the Jefferson Bible, Thomas Jefferson went further and dropped any passages dealing with miracles, visitations of angels and the resurrection of Jesus after his death, as he tried to extract the practical Christian moral code of the New Testament.[68] Enlightenment scholars sought to curtail the political power of organized religion and thereby prevent another age of intolerant religious war.[69] Spinoza determined to remove politics from contemporary and historical theology (e.g., disregarding Judaic law).[70] Moses Mendelssohn advised affording no political weight to any organized religion, but instead recommended that each person follow what they found most convincing.[71] They believed a good religion based in instinctive morals and a belief in God should not theoretically need force to maintain order in its believers, and both Mendelssohn and Spinoza judged religion on its moral fruits, not the logic of its theology.[72] A number of novel ideas about religion developed with the Enlightenment, including deism and talk of atheism. According to Thomas Paine, deism is the simple belief in God the Creator, with no reference to the Bible or any other miraculous source. Instead, the deist relies solely on personal reason to guide his creed,[73] which was eminently agreeable to many thinkers of the time.[74] Atheism was much discussed, but there were few proponents. Wilson and Reill note: "In fact, very few enlightened intellectuals, even when they were vocal critics of Christianity, were true atheists. Rather, they were critics of orthodox belief, wedded rather to skepticism, deism, vitalism, or perhaps pantheism".[75] Some followed Pierre Bayle and argued that atheists could indeed be moral men.[76] Many others like Voltaire held that without belief in a God who punishes evil, the moral order of society was undermined. That is, since atheists gave themselves to no Supreme Authority and no law and had no fear of eternal consequences, they were far more likely to disrupt society.[77] Bayle (1647–1706) observed that, in his day, "prudent persons will always maintain an appearance of [religion]," and he believed that even atheists could hold concepts of honor and go beyond their own self-interest to create and interact in society.[78] Locke said that if there were no God and no divine law, the result would be moral anarchy: every individual "could have no law but his own will, no end but himself. He would be a god to himself, and the satisfaction of his own will the sole measure and end of all his actions."[79] Separation of church and state Main articles: Separation of church and state and Separation of church and state in the United States The "Radical Enlightenment"[80][81] promoted the concept of separating church and state,[82] an idea that is often credited to English philosopher John Locke (1632–1704).[83] According to his principle of the social contract, Locke said that the government lacked authority in the realm of individual conscience, as this was something rational people could not cede to the government for it or others to control. For Locke, this created a natural right in the liberty of conscience, which he said must therefore remain protected from any government authority. These views on religious tolerance and the importance of individual conscience, along with the social contract, became particularly influential in the American colonies and the drafting of the United States Constitution.[84] Thomas Jefferson called for a "wall of separation between church and state" at the federal level. He previously had supported successful efforts to disestablish the Church of England in Virginia[85] and authored the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom.[86] Jefferson's political ideals were greatly influenced by the writings of John Locke, Francis Bacon, and Isaac Newton,[87] whom he considered the three greatest men that ever lived.[88] National variations Europe at the beginning of the War of the Spanish Succession, 1700 The Enlightenment took hold in most European countries, often with a specific local emphasis. For example, in France it became associated with anti-government and anti-Church radicalism, while in Germany it reached deep into the middle classes, where it expressed a spiritualistic and nationalistic tone without threatening governments or established churches.[89] Government responses varied widely. In France, the government was hostile, and the philosophes fought against its censorship, sometimes being imprisoned or hounded into exile. The British government, for the most part, ignored the Enlightenment's leaders in England and Scotland, although it did give Isaac Newton a knighthood and a very lucrative government office. A common theme among most countries which derived enlightenment ideas from Europe was the intentional non-inclusion of enlightenment philosophies pertaining to slavery. Originally during the French Revolution, a revolution deeply inspired by enlightenment philosophy, "France's revolutionary government had denounced slavery, but the property-holding 'revolutionaries' then remembered their bank accounts."[90] Slavery often showed the limitations of the enlightenment as it pertained to European countries since many European countries held colonies supported by slavery. For instance, during the Haitian Revolution England and the United States supported France "rather than giving aid to Saint-Domingue's anti-colonial struggle."[90] Great Britain England Further information: Georgian era § English Enlightenment The very existence of an English Enlightenment has been hotly debated by scholars. The majority of textbooks on British history make little or no mention of an English Enlightenment. Some surveys of the entire Enlightenment include England and others ignore it, although they do include coverage of such major intellectuals as Joseph Addison, Edward Gibbon, John Locke, Isaac Newton, Alexander Pope, Joshua Reynolds and Jonathan Swift.[91] Roy Porter argues that the reasons for this neglect were the assumptions that the movement was primarily French-inspired, that it was largely a-religious or anti-clerical, and that it stood in outspoken defiance to the established order.[92] Porter admits that, after the 1720s, England could claim thinkers to equal Diderot, Voltaire or Rousseau. However, its leading intellectuals such as Edward Gibbon,[93] Edmund Burke and Samuel Johnson were all quite conservative and supportive of the standing order. Porter says the reason was that Enlightenment had come early to England and had succeeded so that the culture had accepted political liberalism, philosophical empiricism, and religious toleration of the sort that intellectuals on the continent had to fight for against powerful odds. Furthermore, England rejected the collectivism of the continent and emphasized the improvement of individuals as the main goal of enlightenment.[94] One leader of the Scottish Enlightenment was Adam Smith, the father of modern economic science Scotland Further information: Scottish Enlightenment In the Scottish Enlightenment, Scotland's major cities created an intellectual infrastructure of mutually supporting institutions such as universities, reading societies, libraries, periodicals, museums and masonic lodges.[95] The Scottish network was "predominantly liberal Calvinist, Newtonian, and 'design' oriented in character which played a major role in the further development of the transatlantic Enlightenment".[96] In France, Voltaire said that "we look to Scotland for all our ideas of civilization".[97] The focus of the Scottish Enlightenment ranged from intellectual and economic matters to the specifically scientific as in the work of William Cullen, physician and chemist; James Anderson, an agronomist; Joseph Black, physicist and chemist; and James Hutton, the first modern geologist.[20][98] Anglo-American colonies Further information: American Enlightenment John Trumbull's Declaration of Independence imagines the drafting committee presenting its work to the Congress Several Americans, especially Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson, played a major role in bringing Enlightenment ideas to the New World and in influencing British and French thinkers.[99] Franklin was influential for his political activism and for his advances in physics.[100][101] The cultural exchange during the Age of Enlightenment ran in both directions across the Atlantic. Thinkers such as Paine, Locke and Rousseau all take Native American cultural practices as examples of natural freedom.[102] The Americans closely followed English and Scottish political ideas, as well as some French thinkers such as Montesquieu.[103] As deists, they were influenced by ideas of John Toland (1670–1722) and Matthew Tindal (1656–1733). During the Enlightenment there was a great emphasis upon liberty, republicanism and religious tolerance. There was no respect for monarchy or inherited political power. Deists reconciled science and religion by rejecting prophecies, miracles and Biblical theology. Leading deists included Thomas Paine in The Age of Reason and by Thomas Jefferson in his short Jefferson Bible – from which all supernatural aspects were removed.[104] German states Further information: History of Germany § Enlightenment, and Hymnody of continental Europe § Rationalism Prussia took the lead among the German states in sponsoring the political reforms that Enlightenment thinkers urged absolute rulers to adopt. There were important movements as well in the smaller states of Bavaria, Saxony, Hanover and the Palatinate. In each case, Enlightenment values became accepted and led to significant political and administrative reforms that laid the groundwork for the creation of modern states.[105] The princes of Saxony, for example, carried out an impressive series of fundamental fiscal, administrative, judicial, educational, cultural and general economic reforms. The reforms were aided by the country's strong urban structure and influential commercial groups and modernized pre-1789 Saxony along the lines of classic Enlightenment principles.[106][107] Weimar's Courtyard of the Muses by Theobald von Oer, a tribute to The Enlightenment and the Weimar Classicism depicting German poets Schiller, Wieland, Herder and Goethe Before 1750, the German upper classes looked to France for intellectual, cultural and architectural leadership, as French was the language of high society. By the mid-18th century, the Aufklärung (The Enlightenment) had transformed German high culture in music, philosophy, science and literature. Christian Wolff (1679–1754) was the pioneer as a writer who expounded the Enlightenment to German readers and legitimized German as a philosophic language.[108] Johann Gottfried von Herder (1744–1803) broke new ground in philosophy and poetry, as a leader of the Sturm und Drang movement of proto-Romanticism. Weimar Classicism (Weimarer Klassik) was a cultural and literary movement based in Weimar that sought to establish a new humanism by synthesizing Romantic, classical and Enlightenment ideas. The movement (from 1772 until 1805) involved Herder as well as polymath Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749–1832) and Friedrich Schiller (1759–1805), a poet and historian. Herder argued that every folk had its own particular identity, which was expressed in its language and culture. This legitimized the promotion of German language and culture and helped shape the development of German nationalism. Schiller's plays expressed the restless spirit of his generation, depicting the hero's struggle against social pressures and the force of destiny.[109] German music, sponsored by the upper classes, came of age under composers Johann Sebastian Bach (1685–1750), Joseph Haydn (1732–1809) and Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart (1756–1791).[110] In remote Königsberg, philosopher Immanuel Kant (1724–1804) tried to reconcile rationalism and religious belief, individual freedom and political authority. Kant's work contained basic tensions that would continue to shape German thought – and indeed all of European philosophy – well into the 20th century.[111] The German Enlightenment won the support of princes, aristocrats and the middle classes and it permanently reshaped the culture.[112] However, there was a conservatism among the elites that warned against going too far.[113] In the 1780s, Lutheran ministers Johann Heinrich Schulz and Karl Wilhelm Brumbey got in trouble with their preaching as they were attacked and ridiculed by Immanuel Kant, Wilhelm Abraham Teller and others. In 1788, Prussia issued an "Edict on Religion" that forbade preaching any sermon that undermined popular belief in the Holy Trinity and the Bible. The goal was to avoid skepticism, deism and theological disputes that might impinge on domestic tranquility. Men who doubted the value of Enlightenment favoured the measure, but so too did many supporters. German universities had created a closed elite that could debate controversial issues among themselves, but spreading them to the public was seen as too risky. This intellectual elite was favoured by the state, but that might be reversed if the process of the Enlightenment proved politically or socially destabilizing.[114] Italy The Enlightenment played a distinctive, if small, role in the history of Italy.[115][116] Although most of Italy was controlled by conservative Habsburgs or the pope, Tuscany had some opportunities for reform. Leopold II of Tuscany abolished the death penalty in Tuscany and reduced censorship. From Naples, Antonio Genovesi (1713–1769) influenced a generation of southern Italian intellectuals and university students. His textbook "Diceosina, o Sia della Filosofia del Giusto e dell'Onesto" (1766) was a controversial attempt to mediate between the history of moral philosophy on the one hand and the specific problems encountered by 18th-century commercial society on the other. It contained the greater part of Genovesi's political, philosophical and economic thought – guidebook for Neapolitan economic and social development.[117] Science flourished as Alessandro Volta and Luigi Galvani made break-through discoveries in electricity. Pietro Verri was a leading economist in Lombardy. Historian Joseph Schumpeter states he was "the most important pre-Smithian authority on Cheapness-and-Plenty".[118] The most influential scholar on the Italian Enlightenment has been Franco Venturi.[119][120] Italy also produced some of the Enlightenment's greatest legal theorists, including Cesare Beccaria, Giambattista Vico and Francesco Mario Pagano. Beccaria in particular is now considered one of the fathers of classical criminal theory as well as modern penology.[121] Beccaria is famous for his masterpiece On Crimes and Punishments (1764), a treatise (later translated into 22 languages) that served as one of the earliest prominent condemnations of torture and the death penalty and thus a landmark work in anti-death penalty philosophy.[43] Spain and Spanish America Main articles: Enlightenment in Spain and Spanish American Enlightenment Spanish Constitution of 1812 When Charles II the last Spanish Hapsburg monarch died in 1700, it touched out a major European conflict about succession and the fate of Spain and the Spanish Empire. The War of the Spanish Succession (1700-1715) brought Bourbon prince Philip, Duke of Anjou to the throne of Spain as Philip V. Under the 1715 Treaty of Utrecht, the French and the Spanish Bourbons could not unite, with Philip renouncing any rights to the French throne. The political restriction did not impede strong French influence of the Age of Enlightenment on Spain, the Spanish monarchs, the Spanish Empire.[122][123] Philip did not come into effective power until 1715 and began implementing administrative reforms to try to stop the decline of the Spanish Empire. Under Charles III, the crown began to implement serious structural changes, generally known as the Bourbon Reforms. The crown curtailed the power of the Catholic Church and the clergy, established a standing military in Spanish America, established new viceroyalties and reorganized administrative districts into intendancies. Freer trade was promoted under comercio libre in which regions could trade with companies sailing from any other Spanish port, rather than the restrictive mercantile system limiting trade. The crown sent out scientific expeditions to assert Spanish sovereignty over territories it claimed but did not control, but also importantly to discover the economic potential of its far-flung empire. Botanical expeditions sought plants that could be of use to the empire.[124] One of the best acts by Charles IV, a monarch not notable for his good judgment, was to give Prussian scientist, Baron Alexander von Humboldt, free rein to travel and gather information about the Spanish empire during his five-year, self-funded expedition. Crown officials were to aid Humboldt in any way they could, so that he was able to get access to expert information. Given that Spain’s empire was closed to foreigners, Humboldt's unfettered access is quite remarkable. His observations of New Spain, published as the Political Essay on the Kingdom of New Spain remains an important scientific and historical text.[125] When Napoleon invaded Spain in 1808, Ferdinand VII abdicated and Napoleon placed his brother Joseph Bonaparte on the throne. To add legitimacy to this move, the Bayonne Constitution was promulgated, which included representation from Spain's overseas components, but most Spaniards rejected the whole Napoleonic project. A war of national resistance erupted. The Cortes de Cádiz (parliament) was convened to rule Spain in the absence of the legitimate monarch, Ferdinand. It created a new governing document, the Constitution of 1812, which laid out three branches of government: executive, legislative, and judicial, put limits on the king by creating a constitutional monarchy, defined citizens as those in the Spanish Empire without African ancestry, established universal manhood suffrage, and established public education starting with primary school through university as well as freedom of expression. The constitution was in effect from 1812 until 1814, when Napoleon was defeated and Ferdinand was restored to the throne of Spain. Upon his return, Ferdinand repudiated the constitution and reestablished absolutist rule.[126] The French invasion of Spain sparked a crisis of legitimacy of rule in Spanish America, with many regions establishing juntas to rule in the name of Ferdinand VII. Most of Spanish America fought for independence, leaving only Cuba and Puerto Rico, as well as the Philippines as overseas components of the Spanish Empire. All of newly independent and sovereign nations became republics by 1824, with written constitutions. Mexico's brief post-independence monarchy was overthrown and replaced by a federal republic under the Constitution of 1824, inspired by both the U.S. and Spanish constitutions. Portugal Main article: History of Portugal (1640–1777) The enlightenment in Portugal (iluminismo) was marked by the rule of the Prime Minister Marquis of Pombal under King Joseph I of Portugal from 1756 to 1777. Following the 1755 Lisbon earthquake which destroyed great part of Lisbon, the Marquis of Pombal implemented important economic policies to regulate commercial activity (in particular with Brazil and England), and to standardise quality throughout the country (for example by introducing the first integrated industries in Portugal). His reconstruction of Lisbon's riverside district in straight and perpendicular streets, methodically organized to facilitate commerce and exchange (for example by assigning to each street a different product or service), can be seen as a direct application of the Enlightenment ideas to governance and urbanism. His urbanistic ideas, also being the first large-scale example of earthquake engineering, became collectively known as Pombaline style, and were implemented throughout the kingdom during his stay in office. His governance was as enlightened as ruthless, see for example the Távora affair. In literature, the first Enlightenment ideas in Portugal can be traced back to the diplomat, philosopher, and writer António Vieira (1608-1697)[citation needed], who spent a considerable amount of his life in colonial Brazil denouncing discriminations against New Christians and the Indigenous peoples in Brazil. His works remain today as one of the best pieces of Portuguese literature[citation needed]. During the 18th century, enlightened literary movements such as the Arcádia Lusitana (lasting from 1756 until 1776, then replaced by the Nova Arcádia in 1790 until 1794) surfaced in the academic medium, in particular involving former students of the University of Coimbra. A distinct member of this group was the poet Manuel Maria Barbosa du Bocage. The ideas of the enlightenment also influenced various economists and anti-colonial intellectuals throughout the Portuguese Empire, such as José de Azeredo Coutinho, José da Silva Lisboa, Cláudio Manoel da Costa, and Tomás de Antônio Gonzaga. As with the Napoleonic invasion of Spain, his invasion of Portugal had consequences for the Portuguese monarchy. With the aid of the British navy, the Portuguese royal family was evacuated to Brazil, its most important colony. Even though Napoleon had been defeated, the royal court remained in Brazil. The Liberal Revolution of 1820 forced the return of the royal family to Portugal. The terms by which the restored king was to rule was a constitutional monarchy under the Constitution of Portugal. Brazil declared its independence of Portugal in 1822, and became a monarchy. Russia In Russia, the government began to actively encourage the proliferation of arts and sciences in the mid-18th century. This era produced the first Russian university, library, theatre, public museum and independent press. Like other enlightened despots, Catherine the Great played a key role in fostering the arts, sciences and education. She used her own interpretation of Enlightenment ideals, assisted by notable international experts such as Voltaire (by correspondence) and in residence world class scientists such as Leonhard Euler and Peter Simon Pallas. The national Enlightenment differed from its Western European counterpart in that it promoted further modernization of all aspects of Russian life and was concerned with attacking the institution of serfdom in Russia. The Russian enlightenment centered on the individual instead of societal enlightenment and encouraged the living of an enlightened life.[127][128] A powerful element was prosveshchenie which combined religious piety, erudition and commitment to the spread of learning. However, it lacked the skeptical and critical spirit of the Western European Enlightenment.[129] Poland Constitution of 3 May, 1791, Europe's first modern constitution Main article: Enlightenment in Poland Enlightenment ideas (oświecenie) emerged late in Poland, as the Polish middle class was weaker and szlachta (nobility) culture (Sarmatism) together with the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth political system (Golden Liberty) were in deep crisis. The political system was built on republicanism, but was unable to defend itself against powerful neighbors Russia, Prussia and Austria as they repeatedly sliced off regions until nothing was left of independent Poland. The period of Polish Enlightenment began in the 1730s–1740s and especially in theatre and the arts peaked in the reign of King Stanisław August Poniatowski (second half of the 18th century). Warsaw was a main centre after 1750, with an expansion of schools and educational institutions and the arts patronage held at the Royal Castle.[130] Leaders promoted tolerance and more education. They included King Stanislaw II Poniatowski and reformers Piotr Switkowski, Antoni Poplawski, Josef Niemcewicz and Jósef Pawlinkowski, as well as Baudouin de Cortenay, a Polonized dramatist. Opponents included Florian Jaroszewicz, Gracjan Piotrowski, Karol Wyrwicz and Wojciech Skarszewski.[131] The movement went into decline with the Third Partition of Poland (1795) – a national tragedy inspiring a short period of sentimental writing – and ended in 1822, replaced by Romanticism.[132] Historiography The Enlightenment has always been contested territory. According to Keith Thomas, its supporters "hail it as the source of everything that is progressive about the modern world. For them, it stands for freedom of thought, rational inquiry, critical thinking, religious tolerance, political liberty, scientific achievement, the pursuit of happiness, and hope for the future."[133] Thomas adds that its detractors accuse it of shallow rationalism, naïve optimism, unrealistic universalism and moral darkness. From the start, conservative and clerical defenders of traditional religion attacked materialism and skepticism as evil forces that encouraged immorality. By 1794, they pointed to the Terror during the French Revolution as confirmation of their predictions. As the Enlightenment was ending, Romantic philosophers argued that excessive dependence on reason was a mistake perpetuated by the Enlightenment because it disregarded the bonds of history, myth, faith, and tradition that were necessary to hold society together.[134] Definition The term "Enlightenment" emerged in English in the later part of the 19th century,[135] with particular reference to French philosophy, as the equivalent of the French term Lumières (used first by Dubos in 1733 and already well established by 1751). From Immanuel Kant's 1784 essay "Beantwortung der Frage: Was ist Aufklärung?" ("Answering the Question: What is Enlightenment?"), the German term became Aufklärung (aufklären = to illuminate; sich aufklären = to clear up). However, scholars have never agreed on a definition of the Enlightenment, or on its chronological or geographical extent. Terms like les Lumières (French), illuminismo (Italian), ilustración (Spanish) and Aufklärung (German) referred to partly overlapping movements. Not until the late nineteenth century did English scholars agree they were talking about "the Enlightenment".[134][136] If there is something you know, communicate it. If there is something you don't know, search for it.— An engraving from the 1772 edition of the Encyclopédie; Truth, in the top center, is surrounded by light and unveiled by the figures to the right, Philosophy and Reason Enlightenment historiography began in the period itself, from what Enlightenment figures said about their work. A dominant element was the intellectual angle they took. D'Alembert's Preliminary Discourse of l'Encyclopédie provides a history of the Enlightenment which comprises a chronological list of developments in the realm of knowledge – of which the Encyclopédie forms the pinnacle.[137] In 1783, Jewish philosopher Moses Mendelssohn referred to Enlightenment as a process by which man was educated in the use of reason.[138] Immanuel Kant called Enlightenment "man's release from his self-incurred tutelage", tutelage being "man's inability to make use of his understanding without direction from another".[139] "For Kant, Enlightenment was mankind's final coming of age, the emancipation of the human consciousness from an immature state of ignorance".[140] The German scholar Ernst Cassirer called the Enlightenment "a part and a special phase of that whole intellectual development through which modern philosophic thought gained its characteristic self-confidence and self-consciousness".[141] According to historian Roy Porter, the liberation of the human mind from a dogmatic state of ignorance, is the epitome of what the Age of Enlightenment was trying to capture.[142] Bertrand Russell saw the Enlightenment as a phase in a progressive development which began in antiquity and that reason and challenges to the established order were constant ideals throughout that time.[143] Russell said that the Enlightenment was ultimately born out of the Protestant reaction against the Catholic counter-reformation and that philosophical views such as affinity for democracy against monarchy originated among 16th-century Protestants to justify their desire to break away from the Catholic Church. Although many of these philosophical ideals were picked up by Catholics, Russell argues that by the 18th century the Enlightenment was the principal manifestation of the schism that began with Martin Luther.[143] Jonathan Israel rejects the attempts of postmodern and Marxian historians to understand the revolutionary ideas of the period purely as by-products of social and economic transformations.[144] He instead focuses on the history of ideas in the period from 1650 to the end of the 18th century and claims that it was the ideas themselves that caused the change that eventually led to the revolutions of the latter half of the 18th century and the early 19th century.[145] Israel argues that until the 1650s Western civilization "was based on a largely shared core of faith, tradition and authority".[146] Time span There is little consensus on the precise beginning of the Age of Enlightenment, though several historians and philosophers argue that it was marked by Descartes' 1637 philosophy of Cogito, ergo sum ("I think, therefore I Am"), which shifted the epistemological basis from external authority to internal certainty.[147][148][149] In France, many cited the publication of Isaac Newton's Principia Mathematica (1687),[150] which built upon the work of earlier scientists and formulated the laws of motion and universal gravitation.[151] The middle of the 17th century (1650) or the beginning of the 18th century (1701) are often used as epochs.[citation needed] French historians usually place the Siècle des Lumières ("Century of Enlightenments") between 1715 and 1789: from the beginning of the reign of Louis XV until the French Revolution.[152] Most scholars use the last years of the century, often choosing the French Revolution of 1789 or the beginning of the Napoleonic Wars (1804–1815) as a convenient point in time with which to date the end of the Enlightenment.[153] Modern study In the 1947 book Dialectic of Enlightenment, Frankfurt School philosophers Max Horkheimer and Theodor W. Adorno argued: Enlightenment, understood in the widest sense as the advance of thought, has always aimed at liberating human beings from fear and installing them as masters. Yet the wholly enlightened earth radiates under the sign of disaster triumphant.[154] Extending Horkheimer and Adorno's argument, intellectual historian Jason Josephson-Storm has argued that any idea of the Age of Enlightenment as a clearly defined period that is separate from the earlier Renaissance and later Romanticism or Counter-Enlightenment constitutes a myth. Josephson-Storm points out that there are vastly different and mutually contradictory periodizations of the Enlightenment depending on nation, field of study, and school of thought; that the term and category of "Enlightenment" referring to the scientific revolution was actually applied after the fact; that the Enlightenment did not see an increase in disenchantment or the dominance of the mechanistic worldview; and that a blur in the early modern ideas of the humanities and natural sciences makes it hard to circumscribe a Scientific Revolution.[155] Josephson-Storm defends his categorization of the Enlightenment as "myth" by noting the regulative role ideas of a period of Enlightenment and disenchantment play in modern Western culture, such that belief in magic, spiritualism, and even religion appears somewhat taboo in intellectual strata.[156] In the 1970s, study of the Enlightenment expanded to include the ways Enlightenment ideas spread to European colonies and how they interacted with indigenous cultures and how the Enlightenment took place in formerly unstudied areas such as Italy, Greece, the Balkans, Poland, Hungary and Russia.[157] Intellectuals such as Robert Darnton and Jürgen Habermas have focused on the social conditions of the Enlightenment. Habermas described the creation of the "bourgeois public sphere" in 18th-century Europe, containing the new venues and modes of communication allowing for rational exchange. Habermas said that the public sphere was bourgeois, egalitarian, rational and independent from the state, making it the ideal venue for intellectuals to critically examine contemporary politics and society, away from the interference of established authority. While the public sphere is generally an integral component of the social study of the Enlightenment, other historians[note 3] have questioned whether the public sphere had these characteristics. Society and culture A medal minted during the reign of Joseph II, Holy Roman Emperor, commemorating his grant of religious liberty to Jews and Protestants in Hungary—another important reform of Joseph II was the abolition of serfdom In contrast to the intellectual historiographical approach of the Enlightenment, which examines the various currents or discourses of intellectual thought within the European context during the 17th and 18th centuries, the cultural (or social) approach examines the changes that occurred in European society and culture. This approach studies the process of changing sociabilities and cultural practices during the Enlightenment. One of the primary elements of the culture of the Enlightenment was the rise of the public sphere, a "realm of communication marked by new arenas of debate, more open and accessible forms of urban public space and sociability, and an explosion of print culture", in the late 17th century and 18th century.[158] Elements of the public sphere included that it was egalitarian, that it discussed the domain of "common concern," and that argument was founded on reason.[159] Habermas uses the term "common concern" to describe those areas of political/social knowledge and discussion that were previously the exclusive territory of the state and religious authorities, now open to critical examination by the public sphere. The values of this bourgeois public sphere included holding reason to be supreme, considering everything to be open to criticism (the public sphere is critical), and the opposition of secrecy of all sorts.[160] German explorer Alexander von Humboldt showed his disgust for slavery and often criticized the colonial policies—he always acted out of a deeply humanistic conviction, borne by the ideas of the Enlightenment.[161] The creation of the public sphere has been associated with two long-term historical trends: the rise of the modern nation state and the rise of capitalism. The modern nation state, in its consolidation of public power, created by counterpoint a private realm of society independent of the state, which allowed for the public sphere. Capitalism also increased society's autonomy and self-awareness, as well as an increasing need for the exchange of information. As the nascent public sphere expanded, it embraced a large variety of institutions and the most commonly cited were coffee houses and cafés, salons and the literary public sphere, figuratively localized in the Republic of Letters.[162] In France, the creation of the public sphere was helped by the aristocracy's move from the King's palace at Versailles to Paris in about 1720, since their rich spending stimulated the trade in luxuries and artistic creations, especially fine paintings.[163] The context for the rise of the public sphere was the economic and social change commonly associated with the Industrial Revolution: "Economic expansion, increasing urbanization, rising population and improving communications in comparison to the stagnation of the previous century".[164] Rising efficiency in production techniques and communication lowered the prices of consumer goods and increased the amount and variety of goods available to consumers (including the literature essential to the public sphere). Meanwhile, the colonial experience (most European states had colonial empires in the 18th century) began to expose European society to extremely heterogeneous cultures, leading to the breaking down of "barriers between cultural systems, religious divides, gender differences and geographical areas".[165] The word "public" implies the highest level of inclusivity – the public sphere by definition should be open to all. However, this sphere was only public to relative degrees. Enlightenment thinkers frequently contrasted their conception of the "public" with that of the people: Condorcet contrasted "opinion" with populace, Marmontel "the opinion of men of letters" with "the opinion of the multitude" and d'Alembert the "truly enlightened public" with "the blind and noisy multitude".[166] Additionally, most institutions of the public sphere excluded both women and the lower classes.[167] Cross-class influences occurred through noble and lower class participation in areas such as the coffeehouses and the Masonic lodges. Social and cultural implications in the arts Because of the focus on reason over superstition, the Enlightenment cultivated the arts.[168] Emphasis on learning, art and music became more widespread, especially with the growing middle class. Areas of study such as literature, philosophy, science, and the fine arts increasingly explored subject matter to which the general public, in addition to the previously more segregated professionals and patrons, could relate.[169] George Frideric Handel As musicians depended more and more on public support, public concerts became increasingly popular and helped supplement performers' and composers' incomes. The concerts also helped them to reach a wider audience. Handel, for example, epitomized this with his highly public musical activities in London. He gained considerable fame there with performances of his operas and oratorios. The music of Haydn and Mozart, with their Viennese Classical styles, are usually regarded as being the most in line with the Enlightenment ideals.[170] The desire to explore, record and systematize knowledge had a meaningful impact on music publications. Jean-Jacques Rousseau's Dictionnaire de musique (published 1767 in Geneva and 1768 in Paris) was a leading text in the late 18th century.[170] This widely available dictionary gave short definitions of words like genius and taste and was clearly influenced by the Enlightenment movement. Another text influenced by Enlightenment values was Charles Burney's A General History of Music: From the Earliest Ages to the Present Period (1776), which was a historical survey and an attempt to rationalize elements in music systematically over time.[171] Recently, musicologists have shown renewed interest in the ideas and consequences of the Enlightenment. For example, Rose Rosengard Subotnik's Deconstructive Variations (subtitled Music and Reason in Western Society) compares Mozart's Die Zauberflöte (1791) using the Enlightenment and Romantic perspectives and concludes that the work is "an ideal musical representation of the Enlightenment".[171] As the economy and the middle class expanded, there was an increasing number of amateur musicians. One manifestation of this involved women, who became more involved with music on a social level. Women were already engaged in professional roles as singers and increased their presence in the amateur performers' scene, especially with keyboard music.[172] Music publishers begin to print music that amateurs could understand and play. The majority of the works that were published were for keyboard, voice and keyboard and chamber ensemble.[172] After these initial genres were popularized, from the mid-century on, amateur groups sang choral music, which then became a new trend for publishers to capitalize on. The increasing study of the fine arts, as well as access to amateur-friendly published works, led to more people becoming interested in reading and discussing music. Music magazines, reviews and critical works which suited amateurs as well as connoisseurs began to surface.[172] Dissemination of ideas The philosophes spent a great deal of energy disseminating their ideas among educated men and women in cosmopolitan cities. They used many venues, some of them quite new. French philosopher Pierre Bayle The Republic of Letters Main article: Republic of Letters The term "Republic of Letters" was coined in 1664 by Pierre Bayle in his journal Nouvelles de la Republique des Lettres. Towards the end of the 18th century, the editor of Histoire de la République des Lettres en France, a literary survey, described the Republic of Letters as being: In the midst of all the governments that decide the fate of men; in the bosom of so many states, the majority of them despotic ... there exists a certain realm which holds sway only over the mind ... that we honour with the name Republic, because it preserves a measure of independence, and because it is almost its essence to be free. It is the realm of talent and of thought.[173] The Republic of Letters was the sum of a number of Enlightenment ideals: an egalitarian realm governed by knowledge that could act across political boundaries and rival state power.[173] It was a forum that supported "free public examination of questions regarding religion or legislation".[174] Immanuel Kant considered written communication essential to his conception of the public sphere; once everyone was a part of the "reading public", then society could be said to be enlightened.[175] The people who participated in the Republic of Letters, such as Diderot and Voltaire, are frequently known today as important Enlightenment figures. Indeed, the men who wrote Diderot's Encyclopédie arguably formed a microcosm of the larger "republic".[176] Front page of The Gentleman's Magazine, January 1731 Many women played an essential part in the French Enlightenment, due to the role they played as salonnières in Parisian salons, as the contrast to the male philosophes. The salon was the principal social institution of the republic[177] and "became the civil working spaces of the project of Enlightenment". Women, as salonnières, were "the legitimate governors of [the] potentially unruly discourse" that took place within.[178] While women were marginalized in the public culture of the Old Regime, the French Revolution destroyed the old cultural and economic restraints of patronage and corporatism (guilds), opening French society to female participation, particularly in the literary sphere.[179] In France, the established men of letters (gens de lettres) had fused with the elites (les grands) of French society by the mid-18th century. This led to the creation of an oppositional literary sphere, Grub Street, the domain of a "multitude of versifiers and would-be authors".[180] These men came to London to become authors, only to discover that the literary market simply could not support large numbers of writers, who in any case were very poorly remunerated by the publishing-bookselling guilds.[181] The writers of Grub Street, the Grub Street Hacks, were left feeling bitter about the relative success of the men of letters[182] and found an outlet for their literature which was typified by the libelle. Written mostly in the form of pamphlets, the libelles "slandered the court, the Church, the aristocracy, the academies, the salons, everything elevated and respectable, including the monarchy itself".[183] Le Gazetier cuirassé by Charles Théveneau de Morande was a prototype of the genre. It was Grub Street literature that was most read by the public during the Enlightenment.[184] According to Darnton, more importantly the Grub Street hacks inherited the "revolutionary spirit" once displayed by the philosophes and paved the way for the French Revolution by desacralizing figures of political, moral and religious authority in France.[185] The book industry ESTC data 1477–1799 by decade given with a regional differentiation The increased consumption of reading materials of all sorts was one of the key features of the "social" Enlightenment. Developments in the Industrial Revolution allowed consumer goods to be produced in greater quantities at lower prices, encouraging the spread of books, pamphlets, newspapers and journals – "media of the transmission of ideas and attitudes". Commercial development likewise increased the demand for information, along with rising populations and increased urbanisation.[186] However, demand for reading material extended outside of the realm of the commercial and outside the realm of the upper and middle classes, as evidenced by the Bibliothèque Bleue. Literacy rates are difficult to gauge, but in France the rates doubled over the course of the 18th century.[187] Reflecting the decreasing influence of religion, the number of books about science and art published in Paris doubled from 1720 to 1780, while the number of books about religion dropped to just one-tenth of the total.[19] Reading underwent serious changes in the 18th century. In particular, Rolf Engelsing has argued for the existence of a Reading Revolution. Until 1750, reading was done intensively: people tended to own a small number of books and read them repeatedly, often to small audience. After 1750, people began to read "extensively", finding as many books as they could, increasingly reading them alone.[188] This is supported by increasing literacy rates, particularly among women.[189] The vast majority of the reading public could not afford to own a private library and while most of the state-run "universal libraries" set up in the 17th and 18th centuries were open to the public, they were not the only sources of reading material. On one end of the spectrum was the Bibliothèque Bleue, a collection of cheaply produced books published in Troyes, France. Intended for a largely rural and semi-literate audience these books included almanacs, retellings of medieval romances and condensed versions of popular novels, among other things. While some historians have argued against the Enlightenment's penetration into the lower classes, the Bibliothèque Bleue represents at least a desire to participate in Enlightenment sociability.[190] Moving up the classes, a variety of institutions offered readers access to material without needing to buy anything. Libraries that lent out their material for a small price started to appear and occasionally bookstores would offer a small lending library to their patrons. Coffee houses commonly offered books, journals and sometimes even popular novels to their customers. The Tatler and The Spectator, two influential periodicals sold from 1709 to 1714, were closely associated with coffee house culture in London, being both read and produced in various establishments in the city.[191] This is an example of the triple or even quadruple function of the coffee house: reading material was often obtained, read, discussed and even produced on the premises.[192] Denis Diderot is best known as the editor of the Encyclopédie It is extremely difficult to determine what people actually read during the Enlightenment. For example, examining the catalogs of private libraries gives an image skewed in favor of the classes wealthy enough to afford libraries and also ignores censored works unlikely to be publicly acknowledged. For this reason, a study of publishing would be much more fruitful for discerning reading habits.[193] Across continental Europe, but in France especially, booksellers and publishers had to negotiate censorship laws of varying strictness. For example, the Encyclopédie narrowly escaped seizure and had to be saved by Malesherbes, the man in charge of the French censor. Indeed, many publishing companies were conveniently located outside France so as to avoid overzealous French censors. They would smuggle their merchandise across the border, where it would then be transported to clandestine booksellers or small-time peddlers.[194] The records of clandestine booksellers may give a better representation of what literate Frenchmen might have truly read, since their clandestine nature provided a less restrictive product choice.[195] In one case, political books were the most popular category, primarily libels and pamphlets. Readers were more interested in sensationalist stories about criminals and political corruption than they were in political theory itself. The second most popular category, "general works" (those books "that did not have a dominant motif and that contained something to offend almost everyone in authority"), demonstrated a high demand for generally low-brow subversive literature. However, these works never became part of literary canon and are largely forgotten today as a result.[195] A healthy, legal publishing industry existed throughout Europe, although established publishers and book sellers occasionally ran afoul of the law. For example, the Encyclopédie condemned not only by the King, but also by Clement XII, nevertheless found its way into print with the help of the aforementioned Malesherbes and creative use of French censorship law.[196] However, many works were sold without running into any legal trouble at all. Borrowing records from libraries in England, Germany, and North America indicate that more than 70 percent of books borrowed were novels. Less than 1 percent of the books were of a religious nature, indicating the general trend of declining religiosity.[173] Natural history Georges Buffon is best remembered for his Histoire naturelle, a 44 volume encyclopedia describing everything known about the natural world Main article: Natural history A genre that greatly rose in importance was that of scientific literature. Natural history in particular became increasingly popular among the upper classes. Works of natural history include René-Antoine Ferchault de Réaumur's Histoire naturelle des insectes and Jacques Gautier d'Agoty's La Myologie complète, ou description de tous les muscles du corps humain (1746). Outside ancien régime France, natural history was an important part of medicine and industry, encompassing the fields of botany, zoology, meteorology, hydrology and mineralogy. Students in Enlightenment universities and academies were taught these subjects to prepare them for careers as diverse as medicine and theology. As shown by Matthew Daniel Eddy, natural history in this context was a very middle class pursuit and operated as a fertile trading zone for the interdisciplinary exchange of diverse scientific ideas.[197] The target audience of natural history was French polite society, evidenced more by the specific discourse of the genre than by the generally high prices of its works. Naturalists catered to polite society's desire for erudition – many texts had an explicit instructive purpose. However, natural history was often a political affair. As Emma Spary writes, the classifications used by naturalists "slipped between the natural world and the social ... to establish not only the expertise of the naturalists over the natural, but also the dominance of the natural over the social".[198] The idea of taste (le goût) was a social indicator: to truly be able to categorize nature, one had to have the proper taste, an ability of discretion shared by all members of polite society. In this way natural history spread many of the scientific developments of the time, but also provided a new source of legitimacy for the dominant class.[199] From this basis, naturalists could then develop their own social ideals based on their scientific works.[200] Scientific and literary journals Journal des sçavans was the earliest academic journal published in Europe The first scientific and literary journals were established during the Enlightenment. The first journal, the Parisian Journal des Sçavans, appeared in 1665. However, it was not until 1682 that periodicals began to be more widely produced. French and Latin were the dominant languages of publication, but there was also a steady demand for material in German and Dutch. There was generally low demand for English publications on the Continent, which was echoed by England's similar lack of desire for French works. Languages commanding less of an international market—such as Danish, Spanish and Portuguese—found journal success more difficult and more often than not a more international language was used instead. French slowly took over Latin's status as the lingua franca of learned circles. This in turn gave precedence to the publishing industry in Holland, where the vast majority of these French language periodicals were produced.[201] Jonathan Israel called the journals the most influential cultural innovation of European intellectual culture.[202] They shifted the attention of the "cultivated public" away from established authorities to novelty and innovation and instead promoted the "enlightened" ideals of toleration and intellectual objectivity. Being a source of knowledge derived from science and reason, they were an implicit critique of existing notions of universal truth monopolized by monarchies, parliaments and religious authorities. They also advanced Christian enlightenment that upheld "the legitimacy of God-ordained authority"—the Bible—in which there had to be agreement between the biblical and natural theories.[203] Encyclopedias and dictionaries First page of the Encyclopedie, published between 1751 and 1766 Although the existence of dictionaries and encyclopedias spanned into ancient times, the texts changed from simply defining words in a long running list to far more detailed discussions of those words in 18th-century encyclopedic dictionaries.[204] The works were part of an Enlightenment movement to systematize knowledge and provide education to a wider audience than the elite. As the 18th century progressed, the content of encyclopedias also changed according to readers' tastes. Volumes tended to focus more strongly on secular affairs, particularly science and technology, rather than matters of theology. Along with secular matters, readers also favoured an alphabetical ordering scheme over cumbersome works arranged along thematic lines.[205] Commenting on alphabetization, the historian Charles Porset has said that "as the zero degree of taxonomy, alphabetical order authorizes all reading strategies; in this respect it could be considered an emblem of the Enlightenment". For Porset, the avoidance of thematic and hierarchical systems thus allows free interpretation of the works and becomes an example of egalitarianism.[206] Encyclopedias and dictionaries also became more popular during the Age of Enlightenment as the number of educated consumers who could afford such texts began to multiply.[204] In the later half of the 18th century, the number of dictionaries and encyclopedias published by decade increased from 63 between 1760 and 1769 to approximately 148 in the decade proceeding the French Revolution (1780–1789).[207] Along with growth in numbers, dictionaries and encyclopedias also grew in length, often having multiple print runs that sometimes included in supplemented editions.[205] The first technical dictionary was drafted by John Harris and entitled Lexicon Technicum: Or, An Universal English Dictionary of Arts and Sciences. Harris' book avoided theological and biographical entries and instead it concentrated on science and technology. Published in 1704, the Lexicon technicum was the first book to be written in English that took a methodical approach to describing mathematics and commercial arithmetic along with the physical sciences and navigation. Other technical dictionaries followed Harris' model, including Ephraim Chambers' Cyclopaedia (1728), which included five editions and was a substantially larger work than Harris'. The folio edition of the work even included foldout engravings. The Cyclopaedia emphasized Newtonian theories, Lockean philosophy and contained thorough examinations of technologies, such as engraving, brewing and dyeing. "Figurative system of human knowledge", the structure that the Encyclopédie organised knowledge into—it had three main branches: memory, reason and imagination In Germany, practical reference works intended for the uneducated majority became popular in the 18th century. The Marperger Curieuses Natur-, Kunst-, Berg-, Gewerkund Handlungs-Lexicon (1712) explained terms that usefully described the trades and scientific and commercial education. Jablonksi Allgemeines Lexicon (1721) was better known than the Handlungs-Lexicon and underscored technical subjects rather than scientific theory. For example, over five columns of text were dedicated to wine while geometry and logic were allocated only twenty-two and seventeen lines, respectively. The first edition of the Encyclopædia Britannica (1771) was modelled along the same lines as the German lexicons.[208] However, the prime example of reference works that systematized scientific knowledge in the age of Enlightenment were universal encyclopedias rather than technical dictionaries. It was the goal of universal encyclopedias to record all human knowledge in a comprehensive reference work.[209] The most well-known of these works is Denis Diderot and Jean le Rond d'Alembert's Encyclopédie, ou dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers. The work, which began publication in 1751, was composed of thirty-five volumes and over 71 000 separate entries. A great number of the entries were dedicated to describing the sciences and crafts in detail and provided intellectuals across Europe with a high-quality survey of human knowledge. In d'Alembert's Preliminary Discourse to the Encyclopedia of Diderot, the work's goal to record the extent of human knowledge in the arts and sciences is outlined: As an Encyclopédie, it is to set forth as well as possible the order and connection of the parts of human knowledge. As a Reasoned Dictionary of the Sciences, Arts, and Trades, it is to contain the general principles that form the basis of each science and each art, liberal or mechanical, and the most essential facts that make up the body and substance of each.[210] The massive work was arranged according to a "tree of knowledge". The tree reflected the marked division between the arts and sciences, which was largely a result of the rise of empiricism. Both areas of knowledge were united by philosophy, or the trunk of the tree of knowledge. The Enlightenment's desacrilization of religion was pronounced in the tree's design, particularly where theology accounted for a peripheral branch, with black magic as a close neighbour.[211] As the Encyclopédie gained popularity, it was published in quarto and octavo editions after 1777. The quarto and octavo editions were much less expensive than previous editions, making the Encyclopédie more accessible to the non-elite. Robert Darnton estimates that there were approximately 25 000 copies of the Encyclopédie in circulation throughout France and Europe before the French Revolution.[212] The extensive, yet affordable encyclopedia came to represent the transmission of Enlightenment and scientific education to an expanding audience.[213] Popularization of science One of the most important developments that the Enlightenment era brought to the discipline of science was its popularization. An increasingly literate population seeking knowledge and education in both the arts and the sciences drove the expansion of print culture and the dissemination of scientific learning. The new literate population was due to a high rise in the availability of food. This enabled many people to rise out of poverty, and instead of paying more for food, they had money for education.[214] Popularization was generally part of an overarching Enlightenment ideal that endeavoured "to make information available to the greatest number of people".[215] As public interest in natural philosophy grew during the 18th century, public lecture courses and the publication of popular texts opened up new roads to money and fame for amateurs and scientists who remained on the periphery of universities and academies.[216] More formal works included explanations of scientific theories for individuals lacking the educational background to comprehend the original scientific text. Sir Isaac Newton's celebrated Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica was published in Latin and remained inaccessible to readers without education in the classics until Enlightenment writers began to translate and analyze the text in the vernacular. A portrait of Bernard de Fontenelle The first significant work that expressed scientific theory and knowledge expressly for the laity, in the vernacular and with the entertainment of readers in mind, was Bernard de Fontenelle's Conversations on the Plurality of Worlds (1686). The book was produced specifically for women with an interest in scientific writing and inspired a variety of similar works.[217] These popular works were written in a discursive style, which was laid out much more clearly for the reader than the complicated articles, treatises and books published by the academies and scientists. Charles Leadbetter's Astronomy (1727) was advertised as "a Work entirely New" that would include "short and easie [sic] Rules and Astronomical Tables".[218] The first French introduction to Newtonianism and the Principia was Eléments de la philosophie de Newton, published by Voltaire in 1738.[219] Émilie du Châtelet's translation of the Principia, published after her death in 1756, also helped to spread Newton's theories beyond scientific academies and the university.[220] Writing for a growing female audience, Francesco Algarotti published Il Newtonianism per le dame, which was a tremendously popular work and was translated from Italian into English by Elizabeth Carter. A similar introduction to Newtonianism for women was produced by Henry Pemberton. His A View of Sir Isaac Newton's Philosophy was published by subscription. Extant records of subscribers show that women from a wide range of social standings purchased the book, indicating the growing number of scientifically inclined female readers among the middling class.[221] During the Enlightenment, women also began producing popular scientific works themselves. Sarah Trimmer wrote a successful natural history textbook for children titled The Easy Introduction to the Knowledge of Nature (1782), which was published for many years after in eleven editions.[222] Schools and universities Main article: Education in the Age of Enlightenment Most work on the Enlightenment emphasizes the ideals discussed by intellectuals, rather than the actual state of education at the time. Leading educational theorists like England's John Locke and Switzerland's Jean Jacques Rousseau both emphasized the importance of shaping young minds early. By the late Enlightenment, there was a rising demand for a more universal approach to education, particularly after the American and French Revolutions. The predominant educational psychology from the 1750s onward, especially in northern European countries was associationism, the notion that the mind associates or dissociates ideas through repeated routines. In addition to being conducive to Enlightenment ideologies of liberty, self-determination and personal responsibility, it offered a practical theory of the mind that allowed teachers to transform longstanding forms of print and manuscript culture into effective graphic tools of learning for the lower and middle orders of society.[223] Children were taught to memorize facts through oral and graphic methods that originated during the Renaissance.[224] Many of the leading universities associated with Enlightenment progressive principles were located in northern Europe, with the most renowned being the universities of Leiden, Göttingen, Halle, Montpellier, Uppsala and Edinburgh. These universities, especially Edinburgh, produced professors whose ideas had a significant impact on Britain's North American colonies and later the American Republic. Within the natural sciences, Edinburgh's medical school also led the way in chemistry, anatomy and pharmacology.[225] In other parts of Europe, the universities and schools of France and most of Europe were bastions of traditionalism and were not hospitable to the Enlightenment. In France, the major exception was the medical university at Montpellier.[226] Learned academies Louis XIV visiting the Académie des sciences in 1671: "It is widely accepted that 'modern science' arose in the Europe of the 17th century, introducing a new understanding of the natural world" — Peter Barrett[227] The history of Academies in France during the Enlightenment begins with the Academy of Science, founded in 1635 in Paris. It was closely tied to the French state, acting as an extension of a government seriously lacking in scientists. It helped promote and organize new disciplines and it trained new scientists. It also contributed to the enhancement of scientists' social status, considering them to be the "most useful of all citizens". Academies demonstrate the rising interest in science along with its increasing secularization, as evidenced by the small number of clerics who were members (13 percent).[228] The presence of the French academies in the public sphere cannot be attributed to their membership, as although the majority of their members were bourgeois, the exclusive institution was only open to elite Parisian scholars. They perceived themselves as "interpreters of the sciences for the people". For example, it was with this in mind that academicians took it upon themselves to disprove the popular pseudo-science of mesmerism.[229] The strongest contribution of the French Academies to the public sphere comes from the concours académiques (roughly translated as "academic contests") they sponsored throughout France. These academic contests were perhaps the most public of any institution during the Enlightenment.[230] The practice of contests dated back to the Middle Ages and was revived in the mid-17th century. The subject matter had previously been generally religious and/or monarchical, featuring essays, poetry and painting. However, by roughly 1725 this subject matter had radically expanded and diversified, including "royal propaganda, philosophical battles, and critical ruminations on the social and political institutions of the Old Regime". Topics of public controversy were also discussed such as the theories of Newton and Descartes, the slave trade, women's education and justice in France.[231] Antoine Lavoisier conducting an experiment related to combustion generated by amplified sun light More importantly, the contests were open to all and the enforced anonymity of each submission guaranteed that neither gender nor social rank would determine the judging. Indeed, although the "vast majority" of participants belonged to the wealthier strata of society ("the liberal arts, the clergy, the judiciary and the medical profession"), there were some cases of the popular classes submitting essays and even winning.[232] Similarly, a significant number of women participated—and won—the competitions. Of a total of 2,300 prize competitions offered in France, women won 49—perhaps a small number by modern standards, but very significant in an age in which most women did not have any academic training. Indeed, the majority of the winning entries were for poetry competitions, a genre commonly stressed in women's education.[233] In England, the Royal Society of London also played a significant role in the public sphere and the spread of Enlightenment ideas. It was founded by a group of independent scientists and given a royal charter in 1662.[234] The Society played a large role in spreading Robert Boyle's experimental philosophy around Europe and acted as a clearinghouse for intellectual correspondence and exchange.[235] Boyle was "a founder of the experimental world in which scientists now live and operate" and his method based knowledge on experimentation, which had to be witnessed to provide proper empirical legitimacy. This is where the Royal Society came into play: witnessing had to be a "collective act" and the Royal Society's assembly rooms were ideal locations for relatively public demonstrations.[236] However, not just any witness was considered to be credible: "Oxford professors were accounted more reliable witnesses than Oxfordshire peasants". Two factors were taken into account: a witness's knowledge in the area and a witness's "moral constitution". In other words, only civil society were considered for Boyle's public.[237] Salons Main article: Historiography of the salon Salons were places where philosophes were reunited and discussed old, actual or new ideas. This led to salons being the birthplace of intellectual and enlightened ideas. Coffeehouses Main articles: Coffeehouse and English coffeehouses in the 17th and 18th centuries Coffeehouses were especially important to the spread of knowledge during the Enlightenment because they created a unique environment in which people from many different walks of life gathered and shared ideas. They were frequently criticized by nobles who feared the possibility of an environment in which class and its accompanying titles and privileges were disregarded. Such an environment was especially intimidating to monarchs who derived much of their power from the disparity between classes of people. If classes were to join together under the influence of Enlightenment thinking, they might recognize the all-encompassing oppression and abuses of their monarchs and because of their size might be able to carry out successful revolts. Monarchs also resented the idea of their subjects convening as one to discuss political matters, especially those concerning foreign affairs—rulers thought political affairs to be their business only, a result of their supposed divine right to rule.[238] Coffeehouses represent a turning point in history during which people discovered that they could have enjoyable social lives within their communities. Coffeeshops became homes away from home for many who sought, for the first time, to engage in discourse with their neighbors and discuss intriguing and thought-provoking matters, especially those regarding philosophy to politics. Coffeehouses were essential to the Enlightenment, for they were centers of free-thinking and self-discovery. Although many coffeehouse patrons were scholars, a great deal were not. Coffeehouses attracted a diverse set of people, including not only the educated wealthy but also members of the bourgeoisie and the lower class. While it may seem positive that patrons, being doctors, lawyers, merchants, etc. represented almost all classes, the coffeeshop environment sparked fear in those who sought to preserve class distinction. One of the most popular critiques of the coffeehouse claimed that it "allowed promiscuous association among people from different rungs of the social ladder, from the artisan to the aristocrat" and was therefore compared to Noah's Ark, receiving all types of animals, clean or unclean.[239] This unique culture served as a catalyst for journalism when Joseph Addison and Richard Steele recognized its potential as an audience. Together, Steele and Addison published The Spectator (1711), a daily publication which aimed, through fictional narrator Mr. Spectator, both to entertain and to provoke discussion regarding serious philosophical matters. The first English coffeehouse opened in Oxford in 1650. Brian Cowan said that Oxford coffeehouses developed into "penny universities", offering a locus of learning that was less formal than structured institutions. These penny universities occupied a significant position in Oxford academic life, as they were frequented by those consequently referred to as the virtuosi, who conducted their research on some of the resulting premises. According to Cowan, "the coffeehouse was a place for like-minded scholars to congregate, to read, as well as learn from and to debate with each other, but was emphatically not a university institution, and the discourse there was of a far different order than any university tutorial".[240] The Café Procope was established in Paris in 1686 and by the 1720s there were around 400 cafés in the city. The Café Procope in particular became a center of Enlightenment, welcoming such celebrities as Voltaire and Rousseau. The Café Procope was where Diderot and D'Alembert decided to create the Encyclopédie.[241] The cafés were one of the various "nerve centers" for bruits publics, public noise or rumour. These bruits were allegedly a much better source of information than were the actual newspapers available at the time.[242] Debating societies Main article: London Debating Societies The debating societies are an example of the public sphere during the Enlightenment.[243] Their origins include: Clubs of fifty or more men who, at the beginning of the 18th century, met in pubs to discuss religious issues and affairs of state. Mooting clubs, set up by law students to practice rhetoric. Spouting clubs, established to help actors train for theatrical roles. John Henley's Oratory, which mixed outrageous sermons with even more absurd questions, like "Whether Scotland be anywhere in the world?".[244] An example of a French salon In the late 1770s, popular debating societies began to move into more "genteel" rooms, a change which helped establish a new standard of sociability.[245] The backdrop to these developments was "an explosion of interest in the theory and practice of public elocution". The debating societies were commercial enterprises that responded to this demand, sometimes very successfully. Some societies welcomed from 800 to 1,200 spectators a night.[246] The debating societies discussed an extremely wide range of topics. Before the Enlightenment, most intellectual debates revolved around "confessional" – that is, Catholic, Lutheran, Reformed (Calvinist) or Anglican issues and the main aim of these debates was to establish which bloc of faith ought to have the "monopoly of truth and a God-given title to authority".[247] After this date, everything thus previously rooted in tradition was questioned and often replaced by new concepts in the light of philosophical reason. After the second half of the 17th century and during the 18th century, a "general process of rationalization and secularization set in" and confessional disputes were reduced to a secondary status in favor of the "escalating contest between faith and incredulity".[247] In addition to debates on religion, societies discussed issues such as politics and the role of women. However, it is important to note that the critical subject matter of these debates did not necessarily translate into opposition to the government. In other words, the results of the debate quite frequently upheld the status quo.[248] From a historical standpoint, one of the most important features of the debating society was their openness to the public, as women attended and even participated in almost every debating society, which were likewise open to all classes providing they could pay the entrance fee. Once inside, spectators were able to participate in a largely egalitarian form of sociability that helped spread Enlightenment ideas.[249] Masonic lodges Masonic initiation ceremony Historians have long debated the extent to which the secret network of Freemasonry was a main factor in the Enlightenment. The leaders of the Enlightenment included Freemasons such as Diderot, Montesquieu, Voltaire, Lessing, Pope,[250] Horace Walpole, Sir Robert Walpole, Mozart, Goethe, Frederick the Great, Benjamin Franklin[251] and George Washington.[252] Norman Davies said that Freemasonry was a powerful force on behalf of liberalism in Europe from about 1700 to the twentieth century. It expanded rapidly during the Age of Enlightenment, reaching practically every country in Europe. It was especially attractive to powerful aristocrats and politicians as well as intellectuals, artists and political activists.[253] During the Age of Enlightenment, Freemasons comprised an international network of like-minded men, often meeting in secret in ritualistic programs at their lodges. They promoted the ideals of the Enlightenment and helped diffuse these values across Britain and France and other places. Freemasonry as a systematic creed with its own myths, values and set of rituals originated in Scotland around 1600 and spread first to England and then across the Continent in the eighteenth century. They fostered new codes of conduct—including a communal understanding of liberty and equality inherited from guild sociability—"liberty, fraternity and equality".[254] Scottish soldiers and Jacobite Scots brought to the Continent ideals of fraternity which reflected not the local system of Scottish customs but the institutions and ideals originating in the English Revolution against royal absolutism.[255] Freemasonry was particularly prevalent in France—by 1789, there were perhaps as many as 100,000 French Masons, making Freemasonry the most popular of all Enlightenment associations.[256] The Freemasons displayed a passion for secrecy and created new degrees and ceremonies. Similar societies, partially imitating Freemasonry, emerged in France, Germany, Sweden and Russia. One example was the Illuminati founded in Bavaria in 1776, which was copied after the Freemasons, but was never part of the movement. The Illuminati was an overtly political group, which most Masonic lodges decidedly were not.[257] Masonic lodges created a private model for public affairs. They "reconstituted the polity and established a constitutional form of self-government, complete with constitutions and laws, elections and representatives". In other words, the micro-society set up within the lodges constituted a normative model for society as a whole. This was especially true on the continent: when the first lodges began to appear in the 1730s, their embodiment of British values was often seen as threatening by state authorities. For example, the Parisian lodge that met in the mid 1720s was composed of English Jacobite exiles.[258] Furthermore, freemasons all across Europe explicitly linked themselves to the Enlightenment as a whole. For example, in French lodges the line "As the means to be enlightened I search for the enlightened" was a part of their initiation rites. British lodges assigned themselves the duty to "initiate the unenlightened". This did not necessarily link lodges to the irreligious, but neither did this exclude them from the occasional heresy. In fact, many lodges praised the Grand Architect, the masonic terminology for the deistic divine being who created a scientifically ordered universe.[259] German historian Reinhart Koselleck claimed: "On the Continent there were two social structures that left a decisive imprint on the Age of Enlightenment: the Republic of Letters and the Masonic lodges".[260] Scottish professor Thomas Munck argues that "although the Masons did promote international and cross-social contacts which were essentially non-religious and broadly in agreement with enlightened values, they can hardly be described as a major radical or reformist network in their own right".[261] Many of the Masons values seemed to greatly appeal to Enlightenment values and thinkers. Diderot discusses the link between Freemason ideals and the enlightenment in D'Alembert's Dream, exploring masonry as a way of spreading enlightenment beliefs.[262] Historian Margaret Jacob stresses the importance of the Masons in indirectly inspiring enlightened political thought.[263] On the negative side, Daniel Roche contests claims that Masonry promoted egalitarianism and he argues that the lodges only attracted men of similar social backgrounds.[264] The presence of noble women in the French "lodges of adoption" that formed in the 1780s was largely due to the close ties shared between these lodges and aristocratic society.[265] The major opponent of Freemasonry was the Roman Catholic Church so that in countries with a large Catholic element, such as France, Italy, Spain and Mexico, much of the ferocity of the political battles involve the confrontation between what Davies calls the reactionary Church and enlightened Freemasonry.[266][267] Even in France, Masons did not act as a group.[268] American historians, while noting that Benjamin Franklin and George Washington were indeed active Masons, have downplayed the importance of Freemasonry in causing the American Revolution because the Masonic order was non-political and included both Patriots and their enemy the Loyalists.[269] Art The art produced during the Enlightenment focused on a search for morality that was absent from the art in previous eras. At the same time, the Classical art of Greece and Rome became interesting to people again, since archaeological teams discovered Pompeii and Herculaneum.[270] People did take inspiration from it and revived the classical art into neo-classical art. This can be especially seen in early American art, where, throughout their art and architecture, they used arches, goddesses, and other classical architectural designs. Important intellectuals For a more comprehensive list, see List of intellectuals of the Enlightenment. See also 1755 Lisbon earthquake Atlantic Revolutions Chapbook Early modern philosophy Education in the Age of Enlightenment European and American voyages of scientific exploration Midlands Enlightenment Regional Enlightenments: American Enlightenment Haskalah, Jewish Enlightenment Modern Greek Enlightenment Polish Enlightenment Russian Enlightenment Scottish Enlightenment Spanish Enlightenment Whig history Notes ^ Back row, left to right: Jean-Baptiste-Louis Gresset, Pierre de Marivaux, Jean-François Marmontel, Joseph-Marie Vien, Antoine Léonard Thomas, Charles Marie de La Condamine, Guillaume Thomas François Raynal, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Jean-Philippe Rameau, La Clairon, Charles-Jean-François Hénault, Étienne François, duc de Choiseul, a bust of Voltaire, Charles-Augustin de Ferriol d'Argental, Jean François de Saint-Lambert, Edmé Bouchardon, Jacques-Germain Soufflot, Jean-Baptiste Bourguignon d'Anville, Anne Claude de Caylus, Fortunato Felice, François Quesnay, Denis Diderot, Anne-Robert-Jacques Turgot, Baron de Laune, Chrétien Guillaume de Lamoignon de Malesherbes, Armand de Vignerot du Plessis, Pierre Louis Maupertuis, Jean-Jacques Dortous de Mairan, Henri François d'Aguesseau, Alexis Clairaut. Front row, right to left: Montesquieu, Sophie d'Houdetot, Claude Joseph Vernet, Bernard Le Bouyer de Fontenelle, Marie-Thérèse Rodet Geoffrin, Louis François, Prince of Conti, Duchesse d'Anville, Philippe Jules François Mancini, François-Joachim de Pierre de Bernis, Claude Prosper Jolyot de Crébillon, Alexis Piron, Charles Pinot Duclos, Claude-Adrien Helvétius, Charles-André van Loo, Jean le Rond d'Alembert, Lekain at the desk reading aloud, Jeanne Julie Éléonore de Lespinasse, Anne-Marie du Boccage, René Antoine Ferchault de Réaumur, Françoise de Graffigny, Étienne Bonnot de Condillac, Bernard de Jussieu, Louis-Jean-Marie Daubenton, Georges-Louis Leclerc, Comte de Buffon. ^ French: le Siècle des Lumières, lit. 'the Century of Lights'; German: Aufklärung, "Enlightenment"; Italian: L'Illuminismo, "Enlightenment"; Polish: Oświecenie , "Enlightenment"; Portuguese: Iluminismo, "Enlightenment"; Spanish: La Ilustración, "Enlightenment"[2] ^ For example, Robert Darnton, Roger Chartier, Brian Cowan, Donna T. Andrew. References Citations ^ Roberson, Rusty (2016), "Enlightened Piety during the Age of Benevolence: The Christian Knowledge Movement in the British Atlantic World", Church History, 85 (2): 246, doi:10.1017/S0009640716000391 ^ "Enlightenment", Encyclopædia Britannica, Encyclopædia Britannica Online, Encyclopædia Britannica Inc., 2016, retrieved 13 June 2016 ^ "The Age of Enlightenment: A History From Beginning to End: Chapter 3". publishinghau5.com. Archived from the original on 3 March 2017. Retrieved 3 April 2017. ^ Eugen Weber, Movements, Currents, Trends: Aspects of European Thought in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries (1992). ^ Outram, Dorinda (2006), Panorama of the Enlightenment, Getty Publications, p. 29, ISBN 978-0892368617 ^ Zafirovski, Milan (2010), The Enlightenment and Its Effects on Modern Society, p. 144 ^ Gay, Peter (1996), The Enlightenment: An Interpretation, W.W. Norton & Company, ISBN 0-393-00870-3 ^ Vottari, Giuseppe (2003). L'illuminismo. Un percorso alfabetico nell'età delle riforme. Alpha Test. p. 54. ISBN 978-88-483-0456-6. ^ Maddaloni, Domenico (2011-11-17). Visioni in movimento. Teorie dell'evoluzione e scienze sociali dall'Illuminismo a oggi: Teorie dell'evoluzione e scienze sociali dall'Illuminismo a oggi. FrancoAngeli. p. 20. ISBN 978-88-568-7115-9. ^ I. Bernard Cohen, "Scientific Revolution and Creativity in the Enlightenment." Eighteenth-Century Life 7.2 (1982): 41–54. ^ Sootin, Harry. Isaac Newton. New York: Messner (1955) ^ a b Jeremy Black, "Ancien Regime and Enlightenment. Some Recent Writing on Seventeenth-and Eighteenth-Century Europe," European History Quarterly 22.2 (1992): 247–55. ^ Robert Darnton, The Business of Enlightenment: a publishing history of the Encyclopédie, 1775–1800 (2009). ^ Robert A. Ferguson, The American Enlightenment, 1750–1820 (1994). ^ Israel 2006, p. 15. ^ Israel 2010, pp. vii–viii, 19. ^ Israel 2010, p. 11. ^ "Enlightenment - Definition, History, & Facts". Encyclopedia Britannica. ^ a b Petitfils 2005, pp. 99–105. ^ a b "The Scottish enlightenment and the challenges for Europe in the 21st century; climate change and energy", The New Yorker, 11 October 2004, archived from the original on 6 June 2011 ^ "Kant's essay What is Enlightenment?". mnstate.edu. ^ Manfred Kuehn, Kant: A Biography (2001). ^ Kreis, Steven (2012-04-13). "Mary Wollstonecraft, 1759–1797". Historyguide.org. Archived from the original on 2014-01-11. Retrieved 2014-01-14. ^ Mary Wollstonecraft, A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (Renascence Editions, 2000) online ^ Bruce P. Lenman, Integration and Enlightenment: Scotland, 1746–1832 (1993) excerpt and text search ^ Sarmant, Thierry, Histoire de Paris, p. 120. ^ Ronald S. Calinger, Leonhard Euler: Mathematical Genius in the Enlightenment (2016) ^ Porter (2003), 79–80. ^ Burns (2003), entry: 7,103. ^ see Hall (1954), iii; Mason (1956), 223. ^ Gillispie, (1980), p. xix. ^ James E. McClellan III, "Learned Societies," in Encyclopedia of the Enlightenment, ed. Alan Charles Kors (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003) "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2012-03-30. Retrieved 2015-10-16.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) (accessed on June 8, 2008). ^ Porter, (2003), p. 91. ^ See Gillispie, (1980), "Conclusion." ^ Porter, (2003), p. 90. ^ Burns, (2003), entry: 158. ^ Thomson, (1786), p. 203. ^ M. Magnusson (10 November 2003), "Review of James Buchan, Capital of the Mind: how Edinburgh Changed the World", New Statesman, archived from the original on 6 June 2011, retrieved 27 April 2014 ^ Swingewood, Alan (1970). "Origins of Sociology: The Case of the Scottish Enlightenment". The British Journal of Sociology. 21 (2): 164–180. doi:10.2307/588406. JSTOR 588406. ^ D. Daiches, P. Jones and J. Jones, A Hotbed of Genius: The Scottish Enlightenment, 1730–1790 (1986). ^ M. Fry, Adam Smith's Legacy: His Place in the Development of Modern Economics (Routledge, 1992). ^ The Illusion of Free Markets, Bernard E. Harcourt, p. 260, notes 11–14. ^ a b "The Enlightenment throughout Europe". History-world.org. Archived from the original on 2013-01-23. Retrieved 2013-03-25. ^ Roland Sarti, Italy: A Reference Guide from the Renaissance to the Present, Infobase Publishing, 2009, p. 457 ^ Daniel Brewer, The Enlightenment Past: reconstructing eighteenth-century French thought (2008), p. 1 ^ De Dijn, Annelien (2012). "The Politics of Enlightenment: From Peter Gay to Jonathan Israel". Historical Journal. 55 (3): 785–805. doi:10.1017/s0018246x12000301. ^ von Guttner, Darius (2015). The French Revolution. Nelson Cengage. pp. 34–35. [permanent dead link] ^ "John Locke > The Influence of John Locke's Works (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)". Plato.stanford.edu. Retrieved 2014-01-14. ^ Pierre Manent, An Intellectual History of Liberalism (1994) pp. 20–38 ^ "The Abolition of The Slave Trade" ^ Lessnoff, Michael H. Social Contract Theory. New York: NYU, 1990. Print.[page needed] ^ Discourse on the Origin of Inequality ^ Rand, B. (1900), The Life, Unpublished Letters and Philosophical Regimen of Anthony, Earl of Shaftesbury, p. 353 quoted in Porter, Roy (2000), Enlightenment, Britain and the Creation of the Modern World, Allen Lane, The Penguin Press, p. 3 ^ Lorraine Y. Landry, Marx and the postmodernism debates: an agenda for critical theory (2000) p. 7 ^ Of the Original Contract ^ Eltis, David; Walvin, James, eds. (1981). The Abolition of the Atlantic Slave Trade. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. p. 76. ^ Northrup, David, ed. (2002). The Atlantic Slave Trade. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. p. 200. ^ David Williams, ed. (1994). Voltaire: Political Writings. pp. xiv–xv. ISBN 978-0-521-43727-1. ^ Stephen J. Lee, Aspects of European history, 1494–1789 (1990) pp. 258–66 ^ Nicholas Henderson, "Joseph II", History Today (March 1991) 41:21–27 ^ John Stanley, "Towards A New Nation: The Enlightenment and National Revival in Poland", Canadian Review of Studies in Nationalism, 1983, Vol. 10 Issue 2, pp. 83–110 ^ Giles MacDonogh, Frederick the Great: A Life in Deed and Letters (2001) p. 341 ^ Chartier, 8. See also Alexis de Tocqueville, L'Ancien Régime et la Révolution, 1850, Book Three, Chapter One. ^ Chartier, 13. ^ Voltaire (1763) A Treatise on Toleration ^ Margaret C. Jacob, ed. The Enlightenment: Brief History with Documents, Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's, 2001, Introduction, pp. 1–72. ^ Locke, John (1695). Reasonableness of Christianity. "Preface" The Reasonableness of Christianity, as delivered in the Scriptures. ^ R.B. Bernstein (2003). Thomas Jefferson. Oxford University Press. p. 179. ISBN 978-0-19-975844-9. ^ Ole Peter Grell; Porter, Roy (2000). Toleration in Enlightenment Europe. Cambridge University Press. pp. 1–68. ISBN 978-0-521-65196-7. ^ Baruch Spinoza, Theologico-Political Treatise, "Preface," 1677, gutenberg.com ^ Mendelssohn, Moses (1783). "Jerusalem: Or on Religious Power and Judaism" (PDF). ^ Goetschel, Willi (2004). Spinoza's Modernity: Mendelssohn, Lessing, and Heine. Univ of Wisconsin Press. p. 126. ISBN 978-0-299-19083-5. ^ Thomas Paine, Of the Religion of Deism Compared with the Christian Religion, 1804, Internet History Sourcebook ^ Ellen Judy Wilson; Peter Hanns Reill (2004). Encyclopedia Of The Enlightenment. Infobase Publishing. p. 148. ISBN 978-1-4381-1021-9. ^ Wilson and Reill (2004). Encyclopedia Of The Enlightenment. Infobase Publishing. p. 26. ISBN 978-1-4381-1021-9. ^ Pagden, Anthony (2013). The Enlightenment: And Why it Still Matters. Oxford University Press. p. 100. ISBN 978-0-19-966093-3. ^ Brown, Stuart (2003). British Philosophy and the Age of Enlightenment: Routledge History of Philosophy. Taylor & Francis. p. 256. ISBN 978-0-415-30877-9. ^ Bayle, Pierre (1741). A general dictionary: historical and critical: in which a new and accurate translation of that of the celebrated Mr. Bayle, with the corrections and observations printed in the late edition at Paris, is included; and interspersed with several thousand lives never before published. The whole containing the history of the most illustrious persons of all ages and nations particularly those of Great Britain and Ireland, distinguished by their rank, actions, learning and other accomplishments. With reflections on such passages of Bayle, as seem to favor scepticism and the Manichee system. p. 778. ^ ENR // AgencyND // University of Notre Dame (2003-05-04). "God, Locke and Equality: Christian Foundations of Locke's Political Thought". Nd.edu. ^ Israel 2011, pp. 11. ^ Israel 2010, p. 19. ^ Israel 2010, pp. vii–viii. ^ Feldman, Noah (2005). Divided by God. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, p. 29 ("It took John Locke to translate the demand for liberty of conscience into a systematic argument for distinguishing the realm of government from the realm of religion.") ^ Feldman, Noah (2005). Divided by God. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, p. 29 ^ Ferling, 2000, p. 158 ^ Mayer, 1994 p. 76 ^ Hayes, 2008, p. 10 ^ Cogliano, 2003, p. 14 ^ David N. Livingstone and Charles W.J. Withers, Geography and Enlightenment (1999) ^ a b A History of Modern Latin America: 1800 to the Present, Second Edition, by Teresa A. Meade ^ Peter Gay, ed. The Enlightenment: A comprehensive anthology (1973) p. 14 ^ Roy Porter, "England" in Alan Charles Kors, ed., Encyclopedia of the Enlightenment (2003) 1:409–15. ^ Karen O'Brien, "English Enlightenment Histories, 1750–c.1815" in José Rabasa, ed. (2012). The Oxford History of Historical Writing: Volume 3: 1400–1800. Oxford, England: OUP. pp. 518–35. ISBN 978-0-19-921917-9. ^ Roy Porter, The creation of the modern world: the untold story of the British Enlightenment (2000), pp. 1–12, 482–84. ^ Israel 2011, pp. 248–49. ^ A. Herman, How the Scots Invented the Modern World (Crown Publishing Group, 2001). ^ Harrison, Lawrence E. (2012). Jews, Confucians, and Protestants: Cultural Capital and the End of Multiculturalism. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 92. ISBN 978-1-4422-1964-9. ^ J. Repcheck, The Man Who Found Time: James Hutton and the Discovery of the Earth's Antiquity (Basic Books, 2003), pp. 117–43. ^ Henry F. May, The Enlightenment in America (1978) ^ Michael Atiyah, "Benjamin Franklin and the Edinburgh Enlightenment," Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society (Dec 2006) 150#4 pp. 591–606. ^ Jack Fruchtman, Jr., Atlantic Cousins: Benjamin Franklin and His Visionary Friends (2007) ^ Charles C. Mann, 1491 (2005) ^ Paul M. Spurlin, Montesquieu in America, 1760–1801 (1941) ^ "The Founding Fathers, Deism, and Christianity". Encyclopædia Britannica. ^ Charles W. Ingrao, "A Pre-Revolutionary Sonderweg." German History 20#3 (2002), pp. 279–86. ^ Katrin Keller, "Saxony: Rétablissement and Enlightened Absolutism." German History 20.3 (2002): 309–31. ^ "The German Enlightenment", German History (Dec 2017) 35#4 pp 588-602, round table discussion of historiography. ^ Gagliardo, John G. (1991). Germany under the Old Regime, 1600–1790. pp. 217–34, 375–95. ^ Richter, Simon J., ed. (2005), The Literature of Weimar Classicism ^ Owens, Samantha; Reul, Barbara M.; Stockigt, Janice B., eds. (2011). Music at German Courts, 1715–1760: Changing Artistic Priorities. ^ Kuehn, Manfred (2001). Kant: A Biography. ^ Van Dulmen, Richard; Williams, Anthony, eds. (1992). The Society of the Enlightenment: The Rise of the Middle Class and Enlightenment Culture in Germany. ^ Thomas P. Saine, The Problem of Being Modern, or the German Pursuit of Enlightenment from Leibniz to the French Revolution (1997) ^ Michael J. Sauter, "The Enlightenment on trial: state service and social discipline in eighteenth-century Germany's public sphere." Modern Intellectual History 5.2 (2008): 195–223. ^ Dino Carpanetto and Giuseppe Ricuperati, Italy in the Age of Reason, 1685–1789 (1987). ^ Burr Litchfield, "Italy" in Kors, ed., Encyclopedia of the Enlightenment (2003) 2:270–76 ^ Niccolò Guasti, "Antonio genovesi's Diceosina: Source of the Neapolitan Enlightenment." History of European ideas 32.4 (2006): 385–405. ^ Pier Luigi Porta, "Lombard enlightenment and classical political economy." The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 18.4 (2011): 521–50. ^ Franco Venturi, Italy and the Enlightenment: studies in a cosmopolitan century (1972) online ^ Anna Maria Rao, "Enlightenment and reform: an overview of culture and politics in Enlightenment Italy." Journal of Modern Italian Studies 10.2 (2005): 142–67. ^ Hostettler, John (2011). Cesare Beccaria: The Genius of 'On Crimes and Punishments'. Hampshire: Waterside Press. p. 160. ISBN 978-1904380634. ^ Aldridge, Alfred Owen. The Ibero-American Enlightenment. Urbana: University of Illinois Press 1971. ^ De Vos, Paula S. "Research, Development, and Empire: State Support of Science in Spain and Spanish America, Sixteenth to Eighteenth Centuries," Colonial Latin America Review 15, no. 1 (June 2006) 55-79. ^ Bleichmar, Daniela. Visible Empire: Botanical Expeditions & Visual Culture in the Hispanic Enlightenment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 2012. ^ Brading, D. A. The First America: The Spanish Monarchy, Creole Patriots, and the Liberal State, 1492-1867 Chapter 23, "Scientific Traveller". New York: Cambridge University Press 1991 ISBN 0-521-39130-X ^ Thiessen, Heather. "Spain: Constitution of 1812." Encyclopedia of Latin American History and Culture, vol. 5, p. 165. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons 1996. ^ Elise Kimerling Wirtschafter, "Thoughts on the Enlightenment and Enlightenment in Russia", Modern Russian History & Historiography, 2009, Vol. 2 Issue 2, pp. 1–26 ^ Israel 2011, pp. 609–32. ^ Colum Leckey, "What is Prosveshchenie? Nikolai Novikov's Historical Dictionary of Russian Writers Revisited." Russian History 37.4 (2010): 360–77. ^ Maciej Janowski, "Warsaw and Its Intelligentsia: Urban Space and Social Change, 1750–1831." Acta Poloniae Historica 100 (2009): 57–77. ISSN 0001-6829 ^ Richard Butterwick, "What is Enlightenment (oświecenie)? Some Polish Answers, 1765–1820." Central Europe 3.1 (2005): 19–37. online[dead link] ^ Jerzy Snopek, "The Polish Literature of the Enlightenment." Archived 2011-10-05 at the Wayback Machine (PDF 122 KB) Poland.pl. Retrieved October 7, 2011. ^ Keith Thomas, "The Great Fight Over the Enlightenment," The New York Review April 3, 2014 ^ a b Thomas, 2014 ^ Oxford English Dictionary, 3rd Edn (revised) ^ Lough, John (1985). "Reflections on Enlightenment and Lumieres". Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies. 8#1: 1–15. doi:10.1111/j.1754-0208.1985.tb00093.x. ^ Jean le Rond d'Alembert, Discours préliminaire de l'Encyclopédie ^ Outram, 1. The past tense is used deliberately as whether man would educate himself or be educated by certain exemplary figures was a common issue at the time. D'Alembert's introduction to l'Encyclopédie, for example, along with Immanuel Kant's essay response (the "independent thinkers"), both support the later model. ^ Immanuel Kant, "What is Enlightenment?", 1. ^ Porter 2001, p. 1 ^ Ernst Cassirer, The Philosophy of the Enlightenment, (1951), p. vi ^ Porter 2001, p. 70 ^ a b Russell, Bertrand. A History of Western Philosophy. pp. 492–94 ^ Israel 2010, pp. 49–50. ^ Israel 2006, pp. v–viii. ^ Israel 2001, pp. 3. ^ Martin Heidegger [1938] (2002) The Age of the World Picture quotation: For up to Descartes ... a particular sub-iectum ... lies at the foundation of its own fixed qualities and changing circumstances. The superiority of a sub-iectum ... arises out of the claim of man to a ... self-supported, unshakeable foundation of truth, in the sense of certainty. Why and how does this claim acquire its decisive authority? The claim originates in that emancipation of man in which he frees himself from obligation to Christian revelational truth and Church doctrine to a legislating for himself that takes its stand upon itself. ^ Ingraffia, Brian D. (1995) Postmodern theory and biblical theology: vanquishing God's shadow p. 126 ^ Norman K. Swazo (2002) Crisis theory and world order: Heideggerian reflections pp. 97–99 ^ Shank, J. B. The Newton Wars and the Beginning of the French Enlightenment (2008), "Introduction"[page needed] ^ "PHYS 200 – Lecture 3 – Newton's Laws of Motion – Open Yale Courses". oyc.yale.edu. ^ Anderson, M. S. Historians and eighteenth-century Europe, 1715-1789 (Oxford UP, 1979); Jean de Viguerie, Histoire et dictionnaire du temps des Lumières (1715-1789) (Paris: Robert Laffont, 1995). ^ Frost, Martin (2008), The age of Enlightenment, archived from the original on 2007-10-10, retrieved 2008-01-18 ^ Theodor W. Adorno; Horkheimer, Max (1947). "The Concept of Enlightenment". In G.S. Noerr (ed.). Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments. Translated by E. Jephcott. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. p. 3. ISBN 978-1-85984-154-9. ^ Josephson-Storm, Jason (2017). The Myth of Disenchantment: Magic, Modernity, and the Birth of the Human Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp. 58–61. ISBN 978-0-226-40336-6. ^ Josephson-Storm, Jason (2017). The Myth of Disenchantment: Magic, Modernity, and the Birth of the Human Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp. 61–62. ISBN 978-0-226-40336-6. ^ Outram, 6. See also, A. Owen Alridge (ed.), The Ibero-American Enlightenment (1971)., Franco Venturi, The End of the Old Regime in Europe 1768–1776: The First Crisis. ^ James Van Horn Melton, The Rise of the Public in Enlightenment Europe (2001), p. 4. ^ Jürgen Habermas, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere, (1989), pp. 36, 37. ^ Melton, 8. ^ Nicolaas A. Rupke (2008). "Alexander Von Humboldt: A Metabiography". University of Chicago Press. p. 138 ISBN 0-226-73149-9 ^ Melton, 4, 5. Habermas, 14–26. ^ Daniel Brewer, ed. (2014). The Cambridge Companion to the French Enlightenment. Cambridge UP. pp. 91ff. ISBN 978-1-316-19432-4. ^ Outram, Dorinda. The Enlightenment (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press, 2005, p. 12. ^ Outram 2005, p. 13. ^ Chartier, 27. ^ Mona Ozouf, "'Public Opinion' at the End of the Old Regime ^ David Beard and Kenneth Gloag, Musicology, The Key Concepts (New York: Routledge, 2005), 58. ^ J. Peter Burkholder, Donald J. Grout and Claude V. Palisca, A History of Western Music, Seventh Edition, (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc., 2006), 475. ^ a b Beard and Gloag, Musicology, 59. ^ a b Beard and Gloag, Musicology, 60. ^ a b c Burkholder, Grout and Palisca, A History of Western Music, 475. ^ a b c Outram, 21. ^ Chartier, 26. ^ Chartier, 26, 26. Kant, "What is Enlightenment?" ^ Outram, 23. ^ Goodman, 3. ^ Dena Goodman, The Republic of Letters: A Cultural History of the French Enlightenment (1994), 53. ^ Carla Hesse, The Other Enlightenment: How French Women Became Modern (2001), 42. ^ Crébillon fils, quoted from Darnton, The Literary Underground, 17. ^ Darnton, The Literary Underground, 19, 20. ^ Darnton, "The Literary Underground", 21, 23. ^ Darnton, The Literary Underground, 29 ^ Outram, 22. ^ Darnton, The Literary Underground, 35–40. ^ Outram, 17, 20. ^ Darnton, "The Literary Underground", 16. ^ from Outram, 19. See Rolf Engelsing, "Die Perioden der Lesergeschichte in der Neuzeit. Das statische Ausmass und die soziokulturelle Bedeutung der Lektüre", Archiv für Geschichte des Buchwesens, 10 (1969), cols. 944–1002 and Der Bürger als Leser: Lesergeschichte in Deutschland, 1500–1800 (Stuttgart, 1974). ^ "history of publishing :: Developments in the 18th century". Encyclopædia Britannica. ^ Outram, 27–29 ^ Erin Mackie, The Commerce of Everyday Life: Selections from The Tatler and The Spectator (Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's, 1998), 16. ^ See Mackie, Darnton, An Early Information Society ^ In particular, see Chapter 6, "Reading, Writing and Publishing" ^ See Darnton, The Literary Underground, 184. ^ a b Darnton, The Literary Underground, 135–47. ^ Darnton, The Business of Enlightenment, 12, 13. For a more detailed description of French censorship laws, see Darnton, The Literary Underground ^ Eddy, Matthew Daniel (2008). The Language of Mineralogy: John Walker, Chemistry and the Edinburgh Medical School, 1750–1800. Ashgate. ^ Emma Spary, "The 'Nature' of Enlightenment" in The Sciences in Enlightened Europe, William Clark, Jan Golinski, and Steven Schaffer, eds. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999), 281–82. ^ Spary, 289–93. ^ See Thomas Laqueur, Making sex: body and gender from the Greeks to Freud (1990). ^ Israel 2001, pp. 143–44. ^ Israel 2001, pp. 142. ^ Israel 2001, pp. 150–51. ^ a b Headrick, (2000), p. 144. ^ a b Headrick, (2000), p. 172. ^ Porter, (2003), pp. 249–50. ^ Headrick, (2000), p. 168. ^ Headrick, (2000), pp. 150–52. ^ Headrick, (2000), p. 153. ^ d'Alembert, p. 4. ^ Darnton, (1979), p. 7. ^ Darnton, (1979), p. 37. ^ Darnton, (1979), p. 6. ^ Jacob, (1988), p. 191; Melton, (2001), pp. 82–83 ^ Headrick, (2000), p. 15 ^ Headrick, (2000), p. 19. ^ Phillips, (1991), pp. 85, 90 ^ Phillips, (1991), p. 90. ^ Porter, (2003), p. 300. ^ Porter, (2003), p. 101. ^ Phillips, (1991), p. 92. ^ Phillips, (1991), p. 107. ^ Eddy, Matthew Daniel (2013). "The Shape of Knowledge: Children and the Visual Culture of Literacy and Numeracy". Science in Context. 26 (2): 215–45. doi:10.1017/s0269889713000045. ^ Hotson, Howard (2007). Commonplace Learning: Ramism and Its German Ramifications 1543–1630. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ^ Eddy, Matthew Daniel (2008). The Language of Mineralogy: John Walker, Chemistry and the Edinburgh Medical School, 1750–1800. Aldershot: Ashgate. ^ Elizabeth Williams, A Cultural History of Medical Vitalism in Enlightenment Montpellier (2003) p. 50 ^ Peter Barrett (2004), Science and Theology Since Copernicus: The Search for Understanding, p. 14, Continuum International Publishing Group, ISBN 0-567-08969-X ^ Daniel Roche, France in the Enlightenment, (1998), 420. ^ Roche, 515–16. ^ Caradonna JL. Annales, "Prendre part au siècle des Lumières: Le concours académique et la culture intellectuelle au XVIIIe siècle" ^ Jeremy L. Caradonna, "Prendre part au siècle des Lumières: Le concours académique et la culture intellectuelle au XVIIIe siècle", Annales. Histoire, Sciences sociales, vol. 64 (mai-juin 2009), n. 3, 633–62. ^ Caradonna, 634–36. ^ Caradonna, 653–54. ^ "Royal Charters". royalsociety.org. ^ Steven Shapin, A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England, Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press, 1994. ^ Steven Shapin and Simon Schaffer, Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985), 5, 56, 57. This same desire for multiple witnesses led to attempts at replication in other locations and a complex iconography and literary technology developed to provide visual and written proof of experimentation. See pp. 59–65. ^ Shapin and Schaffer, 58, 59. ^ Klein, Lawrence E. (1 January 1996). "Coffeehouse Civility, 1660–1714: An Aspect of Post-Courtly Culture in England". Huntington Library Quarterly. 59 (1): 31–51. doi:10.2307/3817904. JSTOR 3817904. ^ Klein, 35. ^ Cowan, 90, 91. ^ Colin Jones, Paris: Biography of a City (New York: Viking, 2004), 188, 189. ^ Darnton, Robert (2000). "An Early Information Society: News and the Media in Eighteenth-Century Paris". The American Historical Review. 105#1 (1): 1–35. doi:10.2307/2652433. JSTOR 2652433. ^ Donna T. Andrew, "Popular Culture and Public Debate: London 1780", This Historical Journal, Vol. 39, No. 2. (June 1996), pp. 405–23. ^ Andrew, 406. Andrew gives the name as "William Henley", which must be a lapse of writing. ^ Andrew, 408. ^ Andrew, 406–08, 411. ^ a b Israel 2001, p. 4. ^ Andrew, 412–15. ^ Andrew, 422. ^ Maynard Mack, Alexander Pope: A Life, Yale University Press, 1985 p. 437–40. Pope, a Catholic, was a Freemason in 1730, eight years before membership was prohibited by the Catholic Church (1738). Pope's name is on the membership list of the Goat Tavern Lodge (p. 439). Pope's name appears on a 1723 list and a 1730 list. ^ J.A. Leo Lemay (2013). The Life of Benjamin Franklin, Volume 2: Printer and Publisher, 1730–1747. University of Pennsylvania Press. pp. 83–92. ISBN 978-0-8122-0929-7. ^ Bullock, Steven C. (1996). "Initiating the Enlightenment?: Recent Scholarship on European Freemasonry". Eighteenth-Century Life. 20 (1): 81. ^ Norman Davies, Europe: A History (1996) pp. 634–35 ^ Margaret C. Jacob's seminal work on Enlightenment freemasonry, Margaret C. Jacob, Living the Enlightenment: Free masonry and Politics in Eighteenth-Century Europe (Oxford University Press, 1991) p. 49. ^ Margaret C. Jacob, "Polite worlds of Enlightenment," in Martin Fitzpatrick and Peter Jones, eds. The Enlightenment World (Routledge, 2004) pp. 272–87. ^ Roche, 436. ^ Fitzpatrick and Jones, eds. The Enlightenment World p. 281 ^ Jacob, pp. 20, 73, 89. ^ Jacob, 145–47. ^ Reinhart Koselleck, Critique and Crisis, p. 62, (The MIT Press, 1988) ^ Thomas Munck, 1994, p. 70. ^ Diderot, Denis (1769). "D'Alembert's Dream" (PDF). ^ Margaret C. Jacob, Living the Enlightenment: Freemasonry and politics in eighteenth-century Europe (Oxford University Press, 1991.) ^ Roche, 437. ^ Jacob, 139. See also Janet M. Burke, "Freemasonry, Friendship and Noblewomen: The Role of the Secret Society in Bringing Enlightenment Thought to Pre-Revolutionary Women Elites", History of European Ideas 10 no. 3 (1989): 283–94. ^ Davies, Europe: A History (1996) pp. 634–35 ^ Richard Weisberger et al., eds., Freemasonry on both sides of the Atlantic: essays concerning the craft in the British Isles, Europe, the United States, and Mexico (2002) ^ Robert R. Palmer, The Age of the Democratic Revolution: The struggle (1970) p. 53 ^ Neil L. York, "Freemasons and the American Revolution", The Historian Volume: 55. Issue: 2. 1993, pp. 315+. ^ Janson, H. W.; Janson, Anthony (2003). A Basic History of Art. New York: Harry N. Abrams, Inc. pp. 458–74. Sources Andrew, Donna T. "Popular Culture and Public Debate: London 1780". The Historical Journal, Vol. 39, No. 2. (June 1996), pp. 405–23. in JSTOR Burns, William. Science in the Enlightenment: An Encyclopædia (2003) Cowan, Brian, The Social Life of Coffee: The Emergence of the British Coffeehouse. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2005 Darnton, Robert. The Literary Underground of the Old Regime. (1982). Israel, Jonathan I. (2001). Radical Enlightenment; Philosophy and the Making of Modernity 1650–1750. Oxford University Press. Israel, Jonathan I. (2006). Enlightenment Contested. Oxford University Press. Israel, Jonathan I. (2010). A Revolution of the Mind: Radical Enlightenment and the Intellectual Origins of Modern Democracy. Princeton. Israel, Jonathan I. (2011). Democratic Enlightenment: Philosophy, Revolution, and Human Rights 1750–1790. Oxford University Press. Melton, James Van Horn. The Rise of the Public in Enlightenment Europe. (2001). Petitfils, Jean-Christian (2005). Louis XVI. Perrin. ISBN 978-2-7441-9130-5. Roche, Daniel. France in the Enlightenment. (1998). Further reading Reference and surveys Becker, Carl L. The Heavenly City of the Eighteenth-Century Philosophers. (1932), a famous short classic Bronner, Stephen. The Great Divide: The Enlightenment and its Critics (1995) Chisick, Harvey. Historical Dictionary of the Enlightenment. 2005. Delon, Michel. Encyclopædia of the Enlightenment (2001) 1480 pp. Dupre, Louis. The Enlightenment & the Intellectual Foundations of Modern Culture 2004 Gay, Peter. The Enlightenment: The Rise of Modern Paganism (1966, 2nd ed. 1995), 952 pp. excerpt and text search vol 1. Peter Gay, The Enlightenment: The Science of Freedom, (1969 2nd ed. 1995), a highly influential study excerpt and text search vol 2; Greensides F, Hyland P, Gomez O (ed.). The Enlightenment (2002) Fitzpatrick, Martin et al., eds. The Enlightenment World. (2004). 714 pp. 39 essays by scholars Hampson, Norman. The Enlightenment (1981) online Hazard, Paul. European thought in the 18th century: From Montesquieu to Lessing (1965) Hesmyr, Atle: From Enlightenment to Romanticism in 18th Century Europe (2018) Himmelfarb, Gertrude. The Roads to Modernity: The British, French, and American Enlightenments (2004) excerpt and text search Jacob, Margaret Enlightenment: A Brief History with Documents 2000 Kors, Alan Charles. Encyclopædia of the Enlightenment (4 vol. 1990; 2nd ed. 2003), 1984 pp. excerpt and text search Munck, Thomas. Enlightenment: A Comparative Social History, 1721–1794 England. (1994) Lehner, Ulrich L.. The Catholic Enlightenment (2016) Lehner, Ulrich L.. Women, Catholicism and Enlightenment (2017) Outram, Dorinda. The Enlightenment(1995) 157 pp. excerpt and text search; also online Outram, Dorinda. Panorama of the Enlightenment (2006), emphasis on Germany; heavily illustrated Porter, Roy (2001), The Enlightenment (2nd ed.), ISBN 978-0-333-94505-6 Sarmant, Thierry (2012). Histoire de Paris: Politique, urbanisme, civilisation. Editions Jean-Paul Gisserot. ISBN 978-2-7558-0330-3. Reill, Peter Hanns, and Wilson, Ellen Judy. Encyclopædia of the Enlightenment. (2nd ed. 2004). 670 pp. Warman, Caroline; et al. (2016), Warman, Caroline (ed.), Tolerance: The Beacon of the Englightenment, Open Book Publishers, doi:10.11647/OBP.0088, ISBN 978-1-78374-203-5 Yolton, John W. et al. The Blackwell Companion to the Enlightenment. (1992). 581 pp. Specialty studies Aldridge, A. Owen (ed.). The Ibero-American Enlightenment (1971). Artz, Frederick B. The Enlightenment in France (1998) online Brewer, Daniel. The Enlightenment Past: reconstructing 18th-century French thought. (2008). Broadie, Alexander. The Scottish Enlightenment: The Historical Age of the Historical Nation (2007) Broadie, Alexander. The Cambridge Companion to the Scottish Enlightenment (2003) excerpt and text search Bronner, Stephen. Reclaiming the Enlightenment: Toward a Politics of Radical Engagement, 2004 Brown, Stuart, ed. British Philosophy in the Age of Enlightenment (2002) Buchan, James. Crowded with Genius: The Scottish Enlightenment: Edinburgh's Moment of the Mind (2004) excerpt and text search Campbell, R.S. and Skinner, A.S., (eds.) The Origins and Nature of the Scottish Enlightenment, Edinburgh, 1982 Cassirer, Ernst. The Philosophy of the Enlightenment. 1955. a highly influential study by a neoKantian philosopher excerpt and text search Chartier, Roger. The Cultural Origins of the French Revolution. Translated by Lydia G. Cochrane. Duke University Press, 1991. Europe in the age of enlightenment and revolution. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art. 1989. ISBN 978-0-87099-451-7. Edelstein, Dan. The Enlightenment: A Genealogy (University of Chicago Press; 2010) 209 pp. Golinski, Jan (2011). "Science in the Enlightenment, Revisited". History of Science. 49 (2): 217–31. Bibcode:2011HisSc..49..217G. doi:10.1177/007327531104900204. S2CID 142886527. Goodman, Dena. The Republic of Letters: A Cultural History of the French Enlightenment. (1994). Hesse, Carla. The Other Enlightenment: How French Women Became Modern. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001. Hankins, Thomas L. Science and the Enlightenment (1985). May, Henry F. The Enlightenment in America. 1976. 419 pp. Porter, Roy. The Creation of the Modern World: The Untold Story of the British Enlightenment. 2000. 608 pp. excerpt and text search Redkop, Benjamin. The Enlightenment and Community, 1999 Reid-Maroney, Nina. Philadelphia's Enlightenment, 1740–1800: Kingdom of Christ, Empire of Reason. 2001. 199 pp. Schmidt, James (2003). "Inventing the Enlightenment: Anti-Jacobins, British Hegelians, and the 'Oxford English Dictionary'". Journal of the History of Ideas. 64 (3): 421–43. JSTOR 3654234. Sorkin, David. The Religious Enlightenment: Protestants, Jews, and Catholics from London to Vienna (2008) Staloff, Darren. Hamilton, Adams, Jefferson: The Politics of Enlightenment and the American Founding. 2005. 419 pp. excerpt and text search Till, Nicholas. Mozart and the Enlightenment: Truth, Virtue, and Beauty in Mozart's Operas. 1993. 384 pp. Tunstall, Kate E. Blindness and Enlightenment. An Essay. With a new translation of Diderot's Letter on the Blind (Continuum, 2011) Venturi, Franco. Utopia and Reform in the Enlightenment. George Macaulay Trevelyan Lecture, (1971) Venturi, Franco. Italy and the Enlightenment: studies in a cosmopolitan century (1972) online Wills, Garry. Cincinnatus : George Washington and the Enlightenment (1984) online Winterer, Caroline. American Enlightenments: Pursuing Happiness in the Age of Reason (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2016) Navarro i Soriano, Ferran (2019). Harca, harca, harca! Músiques per a la recreació històrica de la Guerra de Successió (1794-1715). Editorial DENES. ISBN 978-84-16473-45-8. Primary sources Broadie, Alexander, ed. The Scottish Enlightenment: An Anthology (2001) excerpt and text search Diderot, Denis. Rameau's Nephew and other Works (2008) excerpt and text search. Diderot, Denis. "Letter on the Blind" in Tunstall, Kate E. Blindness and Enlightenment. An Essay. With a new translation of Diderot's Letter on the Blind (Continuum, 2011) Diderot, Denis. The Encyclopédie of Diderot and D'Alembert: Selected Articles (1969) excerpt and text search Collaborative Translation Project of the University of Michigan Gay, Peter, ed. (1973). The Enlightenment: A Comprehensive Anthology. ISBN 0671217070. Gomez, Olga, et al. eds. The Enlightenment: A Sourcebook and Reader (2001) excerpt and text search Kramnick, Issac, ed. The Portable Enlightenment Reader (1995) excerpt and text search Manuel, Frank Edward, ed. The Enlightenment (1965) online, excerpts Schmidt, James, ed. What is Enlightenment?: Eighteenth-Century Answers and Twentieth-Century Questions (1996) excerpt and text search External links Age of Enlightenmentat Wikipedia's sister projects Definitions from Wiktionary Media from Wikimedia Commons Quotations from Wikiquote Data from Wikidata Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). "Enlightenment". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Age of Enlightenment at PhilPapers Age of Enlightenment at the Indiana Philosophy Ontology Project Still, Judith; Marks, John; Ford, Rebecca. "Enlightenment". Words of the World. Brady Haran (University of Nottingham). Legacy of the Enlightenment: The Democratic Revolution of the Enlightenment Areo Magazine (March 2019) Collection: Art of the Enlightenment Era from the University of Michigan Museum of Art v t e Age of Enlightenment Topics Atheism Capitalism Civil liberties Counter-Enlightenment Critical thinking Deism Democracy Empiricism Encyclopédistes Enlightened absolutism Free markets Haskalah Humanism Human rights Liberalism Liberté, égalité, fraternité Methodological skepticism Nationalism Natural philosophy Objectivity Rationality Rationalism Reason Reductionism Sapere aude Science Scientific method Socialism Universality Weimar Classicism Thinkers France Jean le Rond d'Alembert René Louis d'Argenson Pierre Bayle Pierre Beaumarchais Nicolas Chamfort Émilie du Châtelet Étienne Bonnot de Condillac Marquis de Condorcet René Descartes Denis Diderot Bernard Le Bovier de Fontenelle Claude Adrien Helvétius Baron d'Holbach Louis de Jaucourt Julien Offray de La Mettrie Georges-Louis Leclerc Gabriel Bonnot de Mably Sylvain Maréchal Jean Meslier Montesquieu Étienne-Gabriel Morelly Blaise Pascal François Quesnay Guillaume Thomas François Raynal Marquis de Sade Anne Robert Jacques Turgot Voltaire Geneva Firmin Abauzit Charles Bonnet Jean-Jacques Burlamaqui Jean-Louis de Lolme Pierre Prévost Jean-Jacques Rousseau Antoine-Jacques Roustan Horace Bénédict de Saussure Jacob Vernes Jacob Vernet Germany Justus Henning Böhmer Carl Friedrich Gauss Johann Wolfgang von Goethe Johann Gottfried von Herder Theodor Gottlieb von Hippel Wilhelm von Humboldt Immanuel Kant Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Gotthold Ephraim Lessing Georg Christoph Lichtenberg Moses Mendelssohn Samuel von Pufendorf Friedrich Schiller Christian Thomasius Gabriel Wagner Christian Felix Weiße Christoph Martin Wieland Thomas Wizenmann Christian Wolff Greece Neophytos Doukas Theoklitos Farmakidis Rigas Feraios Theophilos Kairis Adamantios Korais Ireland George Berkeley Robert Boyle Edmund Burke John Toland Italy Cesare Beccaria Gaetano Filangieri Ferdinando Galiani Luigi Galvani Antonio Genovesi Francesco Mario Pagano Giovanni Salvemini Pietro Verri Giambattista Vico Netherlands Balthasar Bekker Pieter de la Court Petrus Cunaeus Hugo Grotius François Hemsterhuis Christiaan Huygens Adriaan Koerbagh Frederik van Leenhof Antonie van Leeuwenhoek Bernard Nieuwentyt Baruch Spinoza Jan Swammerdam Hendrik Wyermars Poland Tadeusz Czacki Hugo Kołłątaj Stanisław Konarski Ignacy Krasicki Julian Ursyn Niemcewicz Stanisław August Poniatowski Jędrzej Śniadecki Stanisław Staszic Józef Wybicki Andrzej Stanisław Załuski Józef Andrzej Załuski Portugal Sebastião José de Carvalho e Melo Romania Ion Budai-Deleanu Dinicu Golescu Petru Maior Samuil Micu-Klein Gheorghe Șincai Russia Catherine II Denis Fonvizin Mikhail Kheraskov Mikhail Lomonosov Nikolay Novikov Alexander Radishchev Yekaterina Vorontsova-Dashkova Serbia Dositej Obradović Avram Mrazović Spain José Cadalso Charles III Benito Jerónimo Feijóo y Montenegro Leandro Fernández de Moratín Valentin de Foronda Gaspar Melchor de Jovellanos Martín Sarmiento Diego de Torres Villarroel United Kingdom (Scotland) Joseph Addison Francis Bacon James Beattie Jeremy Bentham Joseph Black Hugh Blair James Boswell James Burnett, Lord Monboddo Anthony Collins Adam Ferguson Edward Gibbon Robert Hooke David Hume Francis Hutcheson Samuel Johnson John Locke John Millar Isaac Newton William Ogilvie Richard Price Joseph Priestley Thomas Reid Shaftesbury Adam Smith Dugald Stewart Mary Wollstonecraft United States Benjamin Franklin Thomas Jefferson James Madison George Mason Thomas Paine Category v t e History of Europe Prehistory Paleolithic Europe Neolithic Europe Bronze Age Europe Iron Age Europe Classical antiquity Classical Greece Roman Republic Hellenistic period Roman Empire Early Christianity Christianity in late antiquity Crisis of the Third Century Fall of the Western Roman Empire Late antiquity Middle Ages Early Middle Ages Migration Period Christianity in the Middle Ages Christianization Francia Byzantine Empire Papal States Bulgarian Empire First Second Maritime republics Venice Genoa Pisa Amalfi Viking Age Kievan Rus' Crown of Aragon Holy Roman Empire High Middle Ages Republic of Florence Feudalism Crusades Mongol invasion Serbian Empire Late Middle Ages Black Death Hundred Years' War Kalmar Union Early modern Renaissance Christianity in the modern era Reformation Age of Discovery Baroque Grand Duchy of Tuscany Thirty Years' War Absolute monarchy Ottoman Empire Portuguese Empire Spanish Empire Early modern France Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth Cossack Hetmanate Swedish Empire Dutch Republic British Empire Habsburg Monarchy Russian Empire Age of Enlightenment Modern Great Divergence Industrial Revolution French Revolution Napoleonic Wars Nationalism Revolutions of 1848 World War I Russian Revolution Interwar period World War II Cold War European integration COVID-19 pandemic See also Art of Europe Genetic history of Europe History of Christianity History of the Mediterranean region History of the European Union History of Western civilization Maritime history of Europe Military history of Europe v t e Western world and culture Aspects Canon Esotericism Law Literature Media Music Painting Modern/Contemporary Painting Philosophy Religion History Classical antiquity Late Antiquity Middle Ages (Early Middle Ages High Middle Ages Late Middle Ages) Christendom Renaissance Reformation Age of Enlightenment Early modern period Great Divergence Modernism Westernization World Wars Cold War War on Terror v t e History of the Catholic Church General History of the Catholic Church By country or region Ecclesiastical history Timeline Papacy Papal primacy Catholic ecumenical councils First seven Catholic Bible Biblical canon Vulgate History of the Roman Curia Religious institutes Christian monasticism Catholic culture Art Role in civilization Papal States Latin Church Eastern Catholic Churches Early Church (30–325/476) Origins and Apostolic Age (30–100) Jesus Ministry Crucifixion Resurrection Great Commission Holy Spirit Mary John the Baptist Apostles Commissioning Peter John Paul Stephen Council of Jerusalem Split with Judaism New Testament Background Gospels Acts Pauline epistles General epistles Revelation Ante-Nicene period (100–325) Persecution Church Fathers Apostolic Fathers Pope Clement I Polycarp Ignatius Irenaeus Justin Martyr Canon Tertullian Origen Late antiquity (313–476) Great Church (180–451) Roman state church (380-451) Constantine the Great Christianity Arian controversy Archbasilica of Saint John Lateran Old St. Peter's Basilica First Council of Nicaea Pope Sylvester I First Council of Constantinople Biblical canon Jerome Vulgate Council of Ephesus Council of Chalcedon Early Middle Ages Benedict of Nursia Monasticism Second Council of Constantinople Pope Gregory I Gregorian chant Islamic conquests Third Council of Constantinople Saint Boniface Byzantine Iconoclasm Second Council of Nicaea Charlemagne Pope Leo III Fourth Council of Constantinople East–West Schism High Middle Ages Pope Urban II Investiture Controversy Crusades Northern States Military orders Universities Scholasticism First Council of the Lateran Second Council of the Lateran Third Council of the Lateran Pope Innocent III Latin Empire Francis of Assisi Fourth Council of the Lateran Inquisition First Council of Lyon Second Council of Lyon Bernard of Clairvaux Late Middle Ages Thomas Aquinas Pope Boniface VIII Western Schism Avignon Papacy Pope Clement V Council of Vienne Knights Templar Catherine of Siena Pope Alexander VI Age of Discovery Reformation Catholic Reformation Reformation Catholic Reformation Thomas More Pope Leo X Society of Jesus Ignatius of Loyola Francis Xavier Dissolution of the Monasteries Council of Trent Pope Pius V Tridentine Mass Teresa of Ávila John of the Cross Peter Canisius Philip Neri Robert Bellarmine Thirty Years' War Baroque Period to the French Revolution Pope Innocent XI Pope Benedict XIV Suppression of the Society of Jesus Age of Enlightenment Anti-clericalism Pope Pius VI Shimabara Rebellion Edict of Nantes Dechristianization of France during the French Revolution 19th century Pope Pius VII Pope Pius IX Dogma of the Immaculate Conception of the Virgin Mary Our Lady of La Salette Our Lady of Lourdes First Vatican Council Papal infallibility Pope Leo XIII Mary of the Divine Heart Prayer of Consecration to the Sacred Heart Rerum novarum 20th century Pope Pius X Our Lady of Fátima Persecutions of the Catholic Church and Pius XII Pope Pius XII Pope Pius XII Consecration to the Immaculate Heart of Mary Dogma of the Assumption of the Virgin Mary Lateran Treaty Nazism Pope John XXIII Second Vatican Council Pope Paul VI Pope John Paul I Mother Teresa Communism Pope John Paul II World Youth Day 1995 21st century Sexual abuse scandal Islam World Youth Day 2000 2002 2005 2008 2011 2013 2016 2019 Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis COVID-19 pandemic  Vatican City portal  Catholicism portal Authority control GND: 4003524-4 HDS: 017433 LCCN: sh85044032 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Age_of_Enlightenment&oldid=994157026" Categories: Age of Enlightenment 18th century 18th-century philosophy Autonomy Critical thinking Ethics Happiness Historical eras History of philosophy History of Europe by period Humanism Knowledge Learning Philosophical movements Philosophy Problem solving skills Progress Reasoning Scientific revolution Secular humanism Secularism Truth Virtue Western culture Hidden categories: Articles containing French-language text Articles containing German-language text Articles containing Italian-language text Articles containing Polish-language text Articles containing Portuguese-language text Articles containing Spanish-language text CS1 maint: archived copy as title All articles with dead external links Articles with dead external links from January 2019 Articles with permanently dead external links Wikipedia articles needing page number citations from February 2020 CS1: long volume value Articles with dead external links from November 2017 Webarchive template wayback links Wikipedia articles needing page number citations from July 2020 Wikipedia semi-protected pages Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from July 2019 Articles with unsourced statements from March 2019 Pages using Sister project links with hidden wikidata Articles containing Hebrew-language text Articles containing Latin-language text Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with HDS identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read View source View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikiquote Languages Afrikaans Alemannisch አማርኛ العربية Aragonés Asturianu Azərbaycanca تۆرکجه বাংলা Bân-lâm-gú Башҡортса Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ Български Boarisch Bosanski Brezhoneg Català Чӑвашла Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Estremeñu Euskara فارسی Fiji Hindi Føroyskt Français Frysk Gaeilge Gàidhlig Galego گیلکی 한국어 Հայերեն हिन्दी Hrvatski Ido Ilokano Bahasa Indonesia Interlingua Íslenska Italiano עברית Kabɩyɛ ქართული Қазақша Kiswahili Ladin Ladino ລາວ Latina Latviešu Lëtzebuergesch Lietuvių Limburgs Lingua Franca Nova Magyar Македонски മലയാളം მარგალური مصرى Bahasa Melayu Minangkabau Mìng-dĕ̤ng-ngṳ̄ Mirandés Монгол Nederlands Nedersaksies नेपाल भाषा 日本語 Norsk bokmål Norsk nynorsk Occitan Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча ਪੰਜਾਬੀ پنجابی Patois Plattdüütsch Polski Português Română Rumantsch Русиньскый Русский Sardu Scots Shqip Sicilianu Simple English Slovenčina Slovenščina کوردی Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Tagalog தமிழ் Татарча/tatarça ไทย Türkçe Türkmençe Українська اردو Vèneto Tiếng Việt Võro 文言 Winaray 吴语 ייִדיש 粵語 Žemaitėška 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 14 December 2020, at 10:29 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2204 ---- Rudyard Kipling - Wikipedia Rudyard Kipling From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia   (Redirected from Kipling) Jump to navigation Jump to search "Kipling" redirects here. For other uses, see Kipling (disambiguation). English short-story writer, poet, and novelist Rudyard Kipling Kipling in 1895 Born Joseph Rudyard Kipling (1865-12-30)30 December 1865 Malabar Hill, Bombay Presidency, British India Died 18 January 1936(1936-01-18) (aged 70) Fitzrovia, London, England Resting place Westminster Abbey Occupation Short-story writer, novelist, poet, journalist Nationality British Genre Short story, novel, children's literature, poetry, travel literature, science fiction Notable works The Jungle Book Just So Stories Kim Captains Courageous "If—" "Gunga Din" "The White Man's Burden" Notable awards Nobel Prize in Literature 1907 Spouse Caroline Starr Balestier ​ ​ (m. 1892)​ Children Josephine Elsie John Signature Joseph Rudyard Kipling (/ˈrʌdjərd/ RUD-yərd; 30 December 1865 – 18 January 1936)[1] was an English journalist, short-story writer, poet, and novelist. He was born in India, which inspired much of his work. Kipling's works of fiction include The Jungle Book (1894), Kim (1901), and many short stories, including "The Man Who Would Be King" (1888).[2] His poems include "Mandalay" (1890), "Gunga Din" (1890), "The Gods of the Copybook Headings" (1919), "The White Man's Burden" (1899), and "If—" (1910). He is seen as an innovator in the art of the short story.[3] His children's books are classics; one critic noted "a versatile and luminous narrative gift." [4][5] Kipling in the late 19th and early 20th centuries was among the United Kingdom's most popular writers.[3] Henry James said "Kipling strikes me personally as the most complete man of genius, as distinct from fine intelligence, that I have ever known."[3] In 1907, he was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature, as the first English-language writer to receive the prize, and at 41, its youngest recipient to date.[6] He was also sounded out for the British Poet Laureateship and several times for a knighthood, but declined both.[7] Following his death in 1936, his ashes were interred at Poets' Corner, part of the South Transept of Westminster Abbey. Kipling's subsequent reputation has changed with the political and social climate of the age.[8][9] The contrasting views of him continued for much of the 20th century.[10][11] Literary critic Douglas Kerr wrote: "[Kipling] is still an author who can inspire passionate disagreement and his place in literary and cultural history is far from settled. But as the age of the European empires recedes, he is recognised as an incomparable, if controversial, interpreter of how empire was experienced. That, and an increasing recognition of his extraordinary narrative gifts, make him a force to be reckoned with."[12] Contents 1 Childhood (1865–1882) 1.1 Education in Britain 1.2 Return to India 2 Early adult life (1882–1914) 2.1 Return to London 2.2 London 2.3 United States 2.3.1 Life in New England 2.4 Devon 2.5 Visits to South Africa 2.6 Sussex 2.6.1 Speculative fiction 2.6.2 Nobel laureate and beyond 2.7 Freemasonry 3 First World War (1914–1918) 3.1 Death of John Kipling 4 After the war (1918–1936) 5 Death 5.1 Legacy 5.2 Links with camping and scouting 5.3 Kipling's Burwash home 5.4 Reputation in India 6 Art 7 Screen portrayals 8 Bibliography 9 See also 10 References 11 Cited sources 12 Further reading 13 External links 13.1 Other information Childhood (1865–1882)[edit] Malabar Point, Bombay, 1865 Rudyard Kipling was born on 30 December 1865 in Bombay, in the Bombay Presidency of British India, to Alice Kipling (née MacDonald) and John Lockwood Kipling.[13] Alice (one of the four noted MacDonald sisters)[14] was a vivacious woman,[15] of whom Lord Dufferin would say, "Dullness and Mrs Kipling cannot exist in the same room."[3][16][17] John Lockwood Kipling, a sculptor and pottery designer, was the Principal and Professor of Architectural Sculpture at the newly founded Sir Jamsetjee Jeejebhoy School of Art in Bombay.[15] John Lockwood and Alice had met in 1863 and courted at Rudyard Lake in Rudyard, Staffordshire, England. They married and moved to India in 1865. They had been so moved by the beauty of the Rudyard Lake area that they named their first child after it. Two of Alice's sisters were married to artists: Georgiana to the painter Edward Burne-Jones, and her sister Agnes to Edward Poynter. Kipling's most prominent relative was his first cousin, Stanley Baldwin, who was Conservative Prime Minister three times in the 1920s and 1930s.[18] Kipling's birth home on the campus of the J.J. School of Art in Bombay was for many years used as the Dean's residence.[19] Although a cottage bears a plaque noting it as his birth site, the original one may have been torn down and replaced decades ago.[20] Some historians and conservationists take the view that the bungalow marks a site merely close to the home of Kipling's birth, as it was built in 1882 – about 15 years after Kipling was born. Kipling seems to have said as much to the Dean when visiting J. J. School in the 1930s.[21] Kipling's India: a map of British India Kipling wrote of Bombay: Mother of Cities to me, For I was born in her gate, Between the palms and the sea, Where the world-end steamers wait.[22] According to Bernice M. Murphy, "Kipling's parents considered themselves 'Anglo-Indians' [a term used in the 19th century for people of British origin living in India] and so too would their son, though he spent the bulk of his life elsewhere. Complex issues of identity and national allegiance would become prominent in his fiction."[23] Kipling referred to such conflicts. For example: "In the afternoon heats before we took our sleep, she (the Portuguese ayah, or nanny) or Meeta (the Hindu bearer, or male attendant) would tell us stories and Indian nursery songs all unforgotten, and we were sent into the dining-room after we had been dressed, with the caution 'Speak English now to Papa and Mamma.' So one spoke 'English', haltingly translated out of the vernacular idiom that one thought and dreamed in."[24] Education in Britain[edit] English Heritage blue plaque marking Kipling's time in Southsea, Portsmouth Kipling's days of "strong light and darkness" in Bombay ended when he was five.[24] As was the custom in British India, he and his three-year-old sister Alice ("Trix") were taken to the United Kingdom – in their case to Southsea, Portsmouth – to live with a couple who boarded children of British nationals living abroad.[25] For the next six years (from October 1871 to April 1877), the children lived with the couple – Captain Pryse Agar Holloway, once an officer in the merchant navy, and Sarah Holloway – at their house, Lorne Lodge, 4 Campbell Road, Southsea.[26] In his autobiography published 65 years later, Kipling recalled the stay with horror, and wondered if the combination of cruelty and neglect which he experienced there at the hands of Mrs Holloway might not have hastened the onset of his literary life: "If you cross-examine a child of seven or eight on his day's doings (specially when he wants to go to sleep) he will contradict himself very satisfactorily. If each contradiction be set down as a lie and retailed at breakfast, life is not easy. I have known a certain amount of bullying, but this was calculated torture – religious as well as scientific. Yet it made me give attention to the lies I soon found it necessary to tell: and this, I presume, is the foundation of literary effort." [24] Kipling's England: A map of England showing Kipling's homes Trix fared better at Lorne Lodge; Mrs Holloway apparently hoped that Trix would eventually marry the Holloways' son.[27] The two Kipling children, however, had no relatives in England they could visit, except that they spent a month each Christmas with a maternal aunt Georgiana ("Georgy") and her husband, Edward Burne-Jones, at their house, The Grange, in Fulham, London, which Kipling called "a paradise which I verily believe saved me."[24] In the spring of 1877, Alice returned from India and removed the children from Lorne Lodge. Kipling remembers "Often and often afterwards, the beloved Aunt would ask me why I had never told any one how I was being treated. Children tell little more than animals, for what comes to them they accept as eternally established. Also, badly-treated children have a clear notion of what they are likely to get if they betray the secrets of a prison-house before they are clear of it."[24] Alice took the children during Spring 1877 to Goldings Farm at Loughton, where a carefree summer and autumn was spent on the farm and adjoining Forest, some of the time with Stanley Baldwin. In January 1878, Kipling was admitted to the United Services College at Westward Ho!, Devon, a school recently founded to prepare boys for the army. It proved rough going for him at first, but later led to firm friendships and provided the setting for his schoolboy stories Stalky & Co. (1899).[27] While there, Kipling met and fell in love with Florence Garrard, who was boarding with Trix at Southsea (to which Trix had returned). Florence became the model for Maisie in Kipling's first novel, The Light That Failed (1891).[27] Return to India[edit] Near the end of his schooling, it was decided that Kipling did not have the academic ability to get into Oxford University on a scholarship.[27] His parents lacked the wherewithal to finance him,[15] and so Kipling's father obtained a job for him in Lahore, where the father served as Principal of the Mayo College of Art and Curator of the Lahore Museum. Kipling was to be assistant editor of a local newspaper, the Civil and Military Gazette. He sailed for India on 20 September 1882 and arrived in Bombay on 18 October. He described the moment years later: "So, at sixteen years and nine months, but looking four or five years older, and adorned with real whiskers which the scandalised Mother abolished within one hour of beholding, I found myself at Bombay where I was born, moving among sights and smells that made me deliver in the vernacular sentences whose meaning I knew not. Other Indian-born boys have told me how the same thing happened to them."[24] This arrival changed Kipling, as he explains: "There were yet three or four days' rail to Lahore, where my people lived. After these, my English years fell away, nor ever, I think, came back in full strength." [24] Early adult life (1882–1914)[edit] From 1883 to 1889, Kipling worked in British India for local newspapers such as the Civil and Military Gazette in Lahore and The Pioneer in Allahabad.[24] Lahore Railway Station in the 1880s Bundi, Rajputana, where Kipling was inspired to write Kim. The former, which was the newspaper Kipling was to call his "mistress and most true love," [24] appeared six days a week throughout the year, except for one-day breaks for Christmas and Easter. Stephen Wheeler, the editor, worked Kipling hard, but Kipling's need to write was unstoppable. In 1886, he published his first collection of verse, Departmental Ditties. That year also brought a change of editors at the newspaper; Kay Robinson, the new editor, allowed more creative freedom and Kipling was asked to contribute short stories to the newspaper.[4] In an article printed in the Chums boys' annual, an ex-colleague of Kipling's stated that "he never knew such a fellow for ink – he simply revelled in it, filling up his pen viciously, and then throwing the contents all over the office, so that it was almost dangerous to approach him."[28] The anecdote continues: "In the hot weather when he (Kipling) wore only white trousers and a thin vest, he is said to have resembled a Dalmatian dog more than a human being, for he was spotted all over with ink in every direction." In the summer of 1883, Kipling visited Shimla, then Simla, a well-known hill station and the summer capital of British India. By then it was the practice for the Viceroy of India and government to move to Simla for six months, and the town became a "centre of power as well as pleasure." [4] Kipling's family became annual visitors to Simla, and Lockwood Kipling was asked to serve in Christ Church there. Rudyard Kipling returned to Simla for his annual leave each year from 1885 to 1888, and the town featured prominently in many stories he wrote for the Gazette.[4] "My month's leave at Simla, or whatever Hill Station my people went to, was pure joy – every golden hour counted. It began in heat and discomfort, by rail and road. It ended in the cool evening, with a wood fire in one's bedroom, and next morn – thirty more of them ahead! – the early cup of tea, the Mother who brought it in, and the long talks of us all together again. One had leisure to work, too, at whatever play-work was in one's head, and that was usually full."[24] Back in Lahore, 39 of his stories appeared in the Gazette between November 1886 and June 1887. Kipling included most of them in Plain Tales from the Hills, his first prose collection, published in Calcutta in January 1888, a month after his 22nd birthday. Kipling's time in Lahore, however, had come to an end. In November 1887, he was moved to the Gazette's larger sister newspaper, The Pioneer, in Allahabad in the United Provinces, where he worked as assistant editor and lived in Belvedere House from 1888 to 1889.[29][30] Rudyard Kipling (right) with his father John Lockwood Kipling (left), circa 1890 Kipling's writing continued at a frenetic pace. In 1888, he published six collections of short stories: Soldiers Three, The Story of the Gadsbys, In Black and White, Under the Deodars, The Phantom Rickshaw, and Wee Willie Winkie. These contain a total of 41 stories, some quite long. In addition, as The Pioneer's special correspondent in the western region of Rajputana, he wrote many sketches that were later collected in Letters of Marque and published in From Sea to Sea and Other Sketches, Letters of Travel.[4] Kipling was discharged from The Pioneer in early 1889 after a dispute. By this time, he had been increasingly thinking of his future. He sold the rights to his six volumes of stories for £200 and a small royalty, and the Plain Tales for £50; in addition, he received six-months' salary from The Pioneer, in lieu of notice.[24] Return to London[edit] Kipling decided to use the money to move to London, as the literary centre of the British Empire. On 9 March 1889, he left India, travelling first to San Francisco via Rangoon, Singapore, Hong Kong and Japan. Kipling was favourably impressed by Japan, calling its people "gracious folk and fair manners." [31] Kipling later wrote that he "had lost his heart" to a geisha whom he called O-Toyo, writing while in the United States during the same trip across the Pacific, "I had left the innocent East far behind.... Weeping softly for O-Toyo.... O-Toyo was a darling."[31] Kipling then travelled through the United States, writing articles for The Pioneer that were later published in From Sea to Sea and Other Sketches, Letters of Travel.[32] Starting his North American travels in San Francisco, Kipling went north to Portland, Oregon, then Seattle, Washington, up to Victoria and Vancouver, British Columbia, through Medicine Hat, Alberta, back into the US to Yellowstone National Park, down to Salt Lake City, then east to Omaha, Nebraska and on to Chicago, Illinois, then to Beaver, Pennsylvania on the Ohio River to visit the Hill family. From there, he went to Chautauqua with Professor Hill, and later to Niagara Falls, Toronto, Washington, D.C., New York, and Boston.[32] In the course of this journey he met Mark Twain in Elmira, New York, and was deeply impressed. Kipling arrived unannounced at Twain's home, and later wrote that as he rang the doorbell, "It occurred to me for the first time that Mark Twain might possibly have other engagements other than the entertainment of escaped lunatics from India, be they ever so full of admiration."[33] A portrait of Kipling by John Collier, ca. 1891 Rudyard Kipling, by Bourne & Shepherd, Calcutta (1892) As it was, Twain gladly welcomed Kipling and had a two-hour conversation with him on trends in Anglo-American literature and about what Twain was going to write in a sequel to Tom Sawyer, with Twain assuring Kipling that a sequel was coming, although he had not decided upon the ending: either Sawyer would be elected to Congress or he would be hanged.[33] Twain also passed along the literary advice that an author should "get your facts first and then you can distort 'em as much as you please."[33] Twain, who rather liked Kipling, later wrote of their meeting: "Between us, we cover all knowledge; he covers all that can be known and I cover the rest."[33] Kipling then crossed the Atlantic to Liverpool in October 1889. He soon made his début in the London literary world, to great acclaim.[3] London[edit] In London, Kipling had several stories accepted by magazines. He found a place to live for the next two years at Villiers Street, near Charing Cross (in a building subsequently named Kipling House): Meantime, I had found me quarters in Villiers Street, Strand, which forty-six years ago was primitive and passionate in its habits and population. My rooms were small, not over-clean or well-kept, but from my desk I could look out of my window through the fanlight of Gatti's Music-Hall entrance, across the street, almost on to its stage. The Charing Cross trains rumbled through my dreams on one side, the boom of the Strand on the other, while, before my windows, Father Thames under the Shot tower walked up and down with his traffic.[34] In the next two years, he published a novel, The Light That Failed, had a nervous breakdown, and met an American writer and publishing agent, Wolcott Balestier, with whom he collaborated on a novel, The Naulahka (a title which he uncharacteristically misspelt; see below).[15] In 1891, as advised by his doctors, Kipling took another sea voyage, to South Africa, Australia, New Zealand, and once again India.[15] He cut short his plans to spend Christmas with his family in India when he heard of Balestier's sudden death from typhoid fever and decided to return to London immediately. Before his return, he had used the telegram to propose to, and be accepted by, Wolcott's sister, Caroline Starr Balestier (1862–1939), called "Carrie", whom he had met a year earlier, and with whom he had apparently been having an intermittent romance.[15] Meanwhile, late in 1891, a collection of his short stories on the British in India, Life's Handicap, was published in London.[35] On 18 January 1892, Carrie Balestier (aged 29) and Rudyard Kipling (aged 26) married in London, in the "thick of an influenza epidemic, when the undertakers had run out of black horses and the dead had to be content with brown ones."[24] The wedding was held at All Souls Church, Langham Place. Henry James gave away the bride. United States[edit] Kipling in his study at Naulakha, Vermont, US, 1895. Kipling and his wife settled upon a honeymoon that took them first to the United States (including a stop at the Balestier family estate near Brattleboro, Vermont) and then to Japan.[15] On arriving in Yokohama, they discovered that their bank, The New Oriental Banking Corporation, had failed. Taking this loss in their stride, they returned to the U.S., back to Vermont – Carrie by this time was pregnant with their first child – and rented a small cottage on a farm near Brattleboro for $10 a month.[24] According to Kipling, "We furnished it with a simplicity that fore-ran the hire-purchase system. We bought, second or third hand, a huge, hot-air stove which we installed in the cellar. We cut generous holes in our thin floors for its eight-inch [20 cm] tin pipes (why we were not burned in our beds each week of the winter I never can understand) and we were extraordinarily and self-centredly content."[24] In this house, which they called Bliss Cottage, their first child, Josephine, was born "in three-foot of snow on the night of 29th December, 1892. Her Mother's birthday being the 31st and mine the 30th of the same month, we congratulated her on her sense of the fitness of things...."[24] Rudyard Kipling's America 1892–1896, 1899 It was also in this cottage that the first dawnings of The Jungle Books came to Kipling: "The workroom in the Bliss Cottage was seven feet by eight, and from December to April, the snow lay level with its window-sill. It chanced that I had written a tale about Indian Forestry work which included a boy who had been brought up by wolves. In the stillness, and suspense, of the winter of '92 some memory of the Masonic Lions of my childhood's magazine, and a phrase in Haggard's Nada the Lily, combined with the echo of this tale. After blocking out the main idea in my head, the pen took charge, and I watched it begin to write stories about Mowgli and animals, which later grew into the two Jungle Books."[24] With Josephine's arrival, Bliss Cottage was felt to be congested, so eventually the couple bought land – 10 acres (4.0 ha) on a rocky hillside overlooking the Connecticut River – from Carrie's brother Beatty Balestier and built their own house. Kipling named this Naulakha, in honour of Wolcott and of their collaboration, and this time the name was spelt correctly.[15] From his early years in Lahore (1882–87), Kipling had become enamoured with the Mughal architecture,[36] especially the Naulakha pavilion situated in Lahore Fort, which eventually inspired the title of his novel as well as the house.[37] The house still stands on Kipling Road, three miles (5 km) north of Brattleboro in Dummerston, Vermont: a big, secluded, dark-green house, with shingled roof and sides, which Kipling called his "ship," and which brought him "sunshine and a mind at ease." [15] His seclusion in Vermont, combined with his healthy "sane clean life," made Kipling both inventive and prolific. In a mere four years he produced, along with the Jungle Books, a book of short stories (The Day's Work), a novel (Captains Courageous), and a profusion of poetry, including the volume The Seven Seas. The collection of Barrack-Room Ballads was issued in March 1892, first published individually for the most part in 1890, and contained his poems "Mandalay" and "Gunga Din." He especially enjoyed writing the Jungle Books and also corresponding with many children who wrote to him about them.[15] Life in New England[edit] Caroline Starr Balestier, portrait by Philip Burne-Jones The writing life in Naulakha was occasionally interrupted by visitors, including his father, who visited soon after his retirement in 1893,[15] and the British writer Arthur Conan Doyle, who brought his golf clubs, stayed for two days, and gave Kipling an extended golf lesson.[38][39] Kipling seemed to take to golf, occasionally practising with the local Congregational minister and even playing with red-painted balls when the ground was covered in snow.[13][39] However, winter golf was "not altogether a success because there were no limits to a drive; the ball might skid two miles (3 km) down the long slope to Connecticut river."[13] Kipling loved the outdoors,[15] not least of whose marvels in Vermont was the turning of the leaves each fall. He described this moment in a letter: "A little maple began it, flaming blood-red of a sudden where he stood against the dark green of a pine-belt. Next morning there was an answering signal from the swamp where the sumacs grow. Three days later, the hill-sides as fast as the eye could range were afire, and the roads paved, with crimson and gold. Then a wet wind blew, and ruined all the uniforms of that gorgeous army; and the oaks, who had held themselves in reserve, buckled on their dull and bronzed cuirasses and stood it out stiffly to the last blown leaf, till nothing remained but pencil-shadings of bare boughs, and one could see into the most private heart of the woods."[40] The Kiplings' first daughter Josephine, 1895. She died of pneumonia in 1899 aged 6. In February 1896, Elsie Kipling was born, the couple's second daughter. By this time, according to several biographers, their marital relationship was no longer light-hearted and spontaneous.[41] Although they would always remain loyal to each other, they seemed now to have fallen into set roles.[15] In a letter to a friend who had become engaged around this time, the 30‑year‑old Kipling offered this sombre counsel: marriage principally taught "the tougher virtues – such as humility, restraint, order, and forethought."[42] Later in the same year, he temporarily taught at Bishop's College School in Quebec, Canada.[43] The Kiplings loved life in Vermont and might have lived out their lives there, were it not for two incidents – one of global politics, the other of family discord. By the early 1890s, the United Kingdom and Venezuela were in a border dispute involving British Guiana. The U.S. had made several offers to arbitrate, but in 1895, the new American Secretary of State Richard Olney upped the ante by arguing for the American "right" to arbitrate on grounds of sovereignty on the continent (see the Olney interpretation as an extension of the Monroe Doctrine).[15] This raised hackles in Britain, and the situation grew into a major Anglo-American crisis, with talk of war on both sides. Although the crisis eased into greater United States–British cooperation, Kipling was bewildered by what he felt was persistent anti-British sentiment in the U.S., especially in the press.[15] He wrote in a letter that it felt like being "aimed at with a decanter across a friendly dinner table."[42] By January 1896, he had decided[13] to end his family's "good wholesome life" in the U.S. and seek their fortunes elsewhere. A family dispute became the final straw. For some time, relations between Carrie and her brother Beatty Balestier had been strained, owing to his drinking and insolvency. In May 1896, an inebriated Beatty encountered Kipling on the street and threatened him with physical harm.[15] The incident led to Beatty's eventual arrest, but in the subsequent hearing and the resulting publicity, Kipling's privacy was destroyed, and he was left feeling miserable and exhausted. In July 1896, a week before the hearing was to resume, the Kiplings packed their belongings, left the United States and returned to England.[13] Kipling's Torquay house, with an English heritage blue plaque on the wall. Devon[edit] By September 1896, the Kiplings were in Torquay, Devon, on the south-western coast of England, in a hillside home overlooking the English Channel. Although Kipling did not much care for his new house, whose design, he claimed, left its occupants feeling dispirited and gloomy, he managed to remain productive and socially active.[15] Kipling was now a famous man, and in the previous two or three years had increasingly been making political pronouncements in his writings. The Kiplings had welcomed their first son, John, in August 1897. Kipling had begun work on two poems, "Recessional" (1897) and "The White Man's Burden" (1899), which were to create controversy when published. Regarded by some as anthems for enlightened and duty-bound empire-building (capturing the mood of the Victorian era), the poems were seen by others as propaganda for brazen-faced imperialism and its attendant racial attitudes; still others saw irony in the poems and warnings of the perils of empire.[15] Take up the White Man's burden— Send forth the best ye breed— Go, bind your sons to exile To serve your captives' need; To wait, in heavy harness, On fluttered folk and wild— Your new-caught sullen peoples, Half devil and half child. —The White Man's Burden[44] There was also foreboding in the poems, a sense that all could yet come to naught.[45] Far-called, our navies melt away; On dune and headland sinks the fire: Lo, all our pomp of yesterday Is one with Nineveh and Tyre! Judge of the Nations, spare us yet. Lest we forget – lest we forget! —Recessional[46] A prolific writer during his time in Torquay, he also wrote Stalky & Co., a collection of school stories (born of his experience at the United Services College in Westward Ho!), whose juvenile protagonists display a know-it-all, cynical outlook on patriotism and authority. According to his family, Kipling enjoyed reading aloud stories from Stalky & Co. to them and often went into spasms of laughter over his own jokes.[15] Visits to South Africa[edit] H.A. Gwynne, Julian Ralph, Perceval Landon, and Rudyard Kipling in South Africa, 1900–1901. In early 1898, the Kiplings travelled to South Africa for their winter holiday, so beginning an annual tradition which (except the following year) would last until 1908. They would stay in "The Woolsack," a house on Cecil Rhodes's estate at Groote Schuur (now a student residence for the University of Cape Town), within walking distance of Rhodes' mansion.[47] With his new reputation as Poet of the Empire, Kipling was warmly received by some of the influential politicians of the Cape Colony, including Rhodes, Sir Alfred Milner, and Leander Starr Jameson. Kipling cultivated their friendship and came to admire the men and their politics. The period 1898–1910 was crucial in the history of South Africa and included the Second Boer War (1899–1902), the ensuing peace treaty, and the 1910 formation of the Union of South Africa. Back in England, Kipling wrote poetry in support of the British cause in the Boer War and on his next visit to South Africa in early 1900, became a correspondent for The Friend newspaper in Bloemfontein, which had been commandeered by Lord Roberts for British troops.[48] Although his journalistic stint was to last only two weeks, it was Kipling's first work on a newspaper staff since he left The Pioneer in Allahabad more than ten years before.[15] At The Friend, he made lifelong friendships with Perceval Landon, H. A. Gwynne, and others.[49] He also wrote articles published more widely expressing his views on the conflict.[50] Kipling penned an inscription for the Honoured Dead Memorial (Siege memorial) in Kimberley. Sussex[edit] Kipling at his desk, 1899. Portrait by his cousin, Sir Philip Burne-Jones In 1897, Kipling moved from Torquay to Rottingdean, near Brighton, East Sussex – first to North End House and then to the Elms.[51] In 1902, Kipling bought Bateman's, a house built in 1634 and located in rural Burwash. Bateman's was Kipling's home from 1902 until his death in 1936.[52] The house and its surrounding buildings, the mill and 33 acres (13 ha), were bought for £9,300. It had no bathroom, no running water upstairs and no electricity, but Kipling loved it: "Behold us, lawful owners of a grey stone lichened house – A.D. 1634 over the door – beamed, panelled, with old oak staircase, and all untouched and unfaked. It is a good and peaceable place. We have loved it ever since our first sight of it" (from a November 1902 letter).[53][54] In the non-fiction realm, he became involved in the debate over the British response to the rise in German naval power known as the Tirpitz Plan, to build a fleet to challenge the Royal Navy, publishing a series of articles in 1898 collected as A Fleet in Being. On a visit to the United States in 1899, Kipling and his daughter Josephine developed pneumonia, from which she eventually died. ("Kim's Gun" as seen in 1903) "He sat in defiance of municipal orders, astride the gun Zam-Zammeh, on her old platform, opposite the old Ajaibgher, the Wonder House, as the natives called the Lahore Museum." -Kim In the wake of his daughter's death, Kipling concentrated on collecting material for what became Just So Stories for Little Children, published in 1902, the year after Kim.[55] The American literary scholar David Scott has argued that Kim disproves the claim by Edward Said about Kipling as a promoter of Orientalism as Kipling – who was deeply interested in Buddhism – as he presented Tibetan Buddhism in a fairly sympathetic light and aspects of the novel appeared to reflect a Buddhist understanding of the universe.[56][57] Kipling was offended by the German Emperor Wilhelm II's Hun speech (Hunnenrede) in 1900, urging German troops being sent to China to crush the Boxer Rebellion to behave like "Huns" and take no prisoners.[58] In a 1902 poem, The Rowers, Kipling attacked the Kaiser as a threat to Britain and made the first use of the term "Hun" as an anti-German insult, using Wilhelm's own words and the actions of German troops in China to portray Germans as essentially barbarian.[58] In an interview with the French newspaper Le Figaro, the Francophile Kipling called Germany a menace and called for an Anglo-French alliance to stop it.[58] In another letter at the same time, Kipling described the "unfrei peoples of Central Europe" as living in "the Middle Ages with machine guns." [58] Speculative fiction[edit] Kipling wrote a number of speculative fiction short stories, including "The Army of a Dream," in which he sought to show a more efficient and responsible army than the hereditary bureaucracy of England at the time, and two science fiction stories: "With the Night Mail" (1905) and "As Easy As A.B.C." (1912). Both were set in the 21st century in Kipling's Aerial Board of Control universe. They read like modern hard science fiction,[59] and introduced the literary technique known as indirect exposition, which would later become one of science fiction writer Robert Heinlein's hallmarks. This technique is one that Kipling picked up in India, and used to solve the problem of his English readers not understanding much about Indian society, when writing The Jungle Book.[60] Nobel laureate and beyond[edit] In 1907, he was awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature, having been nominated in that year by Charles Oman, professor at the University of Oxford.[61] The prize citation said it was "in consideration of the power of observation, originality of imagination, virility of ideas and remarkable talent for narration which characterize the creations of this world-famous author." Nobel prizes had been established in 1901 and Kipling was the first English-language recipient. At the award ceremony in Stockholm on 10 December 1907, the Permanent Secretary of the Swedish Academy, Carl David af Wirsén, praised both Kipling and three centuries of English literature: The Swedish Academy, in awarding the Nobel Prize in Literature this year to Rudyard Kipling, desires to pay a tribute of homage to the literature of England, so rich in manifold glories, and to the greatest genius in the realm of narrative that that country has produced in our times.[62] To "book-end" this achievement came the publication of two connected poetry and story collections: Puck of Pook's Hill (1906), and Rewards and Fairies (1910). The latter contained the poem "If—." In a 1995 BBC opinion poll, it was voted the UK's favourite poem.[63] This exhortation to self-control and stoicism is arguably Kipling's most famous poem.[63] Rudyard Kipling by George Wylie Hutchinson Such was Kipling's popularity that he was asked by his friend Max Aitken to intervene in the 1911 Canadian election on behalf of the Conservatives.[64] In 1911, the major issue in Canada was a reciprocity treaty with the United States signed by the Liberal Prime Minister Sir Wilfrid Laurier and vigorously opposed by the Conservatives under Sir Robert Borden. On 7 September 1911, the Montreal Daily Star newspaper published a front-page appeal against the agreement by Kipling, who wrote: "It is her own soul that Canada risks today. Once that soul is pawned for any consideration, Canada must inevitably conform to the commercial, legal, financial, social, and ethical standards which will be imposed on her by the sheer admitted weight of the United States."[64] At the time, the Montreal Daily Star was Canada's most read newspaper. Over the next week, Kipling's appeal was reprinted in every English newspaper in Canada and is credited with helping to turn Canadian public opinion against the Liberal government.[64] Kipling sympathised with the anti-Home Rule stance of Irish Unionists, who opposed Irish autonomy. He was friends with Edward Carson, the Dublin-born leader of Ulster Unionism, who raised the Ulster Volunteers to prevent Home Rule in Ireland. Kipling wrote in a letter to a friend that Ireland was not a nation, and that before the English arrived in 1169, the Irish were a gang of cattle thieves living in savagery and killing each other while "writing dreary poems" about it all. In his view it was only British rule that allowed Ireland to advance.[65] A visit to Ireland in 1911 confirmed Kipling's prejudices. He wrote that the Irish countryside was beautiful, but spoiled by what he called the ugly homes of Irish farmers, with Kipling adding that God had made the Irish into poets having "deprived them of love of line or knowledge of colour." [66] In contrast, Kipling had nothing but praise for the "decent folk" of the Protestant minority and Unionist Ulster, free from the threat of "constant mob violence".[66] Kipling wrote the poem "Ulster" in 1912, reflecting his Unionist politics. Kipling often referred to the Irish Unionists as "our party." [67] Kipling had no sympathy or understanding for Irish nationalism, seeing Home Rule as an act of treason by the government of the Liberal Prime Minister H. H. Asquith that would plunge Ireland into the Dark Ages and allow the Irish Catholic majority to oppress the Protestant minority.[68] The scholar David Gilmour wrote that Kipling's lack of understanding of Ireland could be seen in his attack on John Redmond – the Anglophile leader of the Irish Parliamentary Party who wanted Home Rule because he believed it was the best way of keeping the United Kingdom together – as a traitor working to break up the United Kingdom.[69] Ulster was first publicly read at an Unionist rally in Belfast, where the largest Union Jack ever made was unfolded.[69] Kipling admitted it was meant to strike a "hard blow" against the Asquith government's Home Rule bill: "Rebellion, rapine, hate, Oppression, wrong and greed, Are loosed to rule our fate, By England's act and deed." [66] Ulster generated much controversy with the Conservative MP Sir Mark Sykes – who as a Unionist was opposed to the Home Rule bill – condemning Ulster in The Morning Post as a "direct appeal to ignorance and a deliberate attempt to foster religious hate." [69] Kipling was a staunch opponent of Bolshevism, a position which he shared with his friend Henry Rider Haggard. The two had bonded on Kipling's arrival in London in 1889 largely due to their shared opinions, and remained lifelong friends. Freemasonry[edit] According to the English magazine Masonic Illustrated, Kipling became a Freemason in about 1885, before the usual minimum age of 21,[70] being initiated into Hope and Perseverance Lodge No. 782 in Lahore. He later wrote to The Times, "I was Secretary for some years of the Lodge... which included Brethren of at least four creeds. I was entered [as an Apprentice] by a member from Brahmo Somaj, a Hindu, passed [to the degree of Fellow Craft] by a Mohammedan, and raised [to the degree of Master Mason] by an Englishman. Our Tyler was an Indian Jew." Kipling received not only the three degrees of Craft Masonry but also the side degrees of Mark Master Mason and Royal Ark Mariner.[71] Kipling so loved his Masonic experience that he memorialised its ideals in his poem "The Mother Lodge," [70] and used the fraternity and its symbols as vital plot devices in his novella The Man Who Would Be King.[72] First World War (1914–1918)[edit] At the beginning of the First World War, like many other writers, Kipling wrote pamphlets and poems enthusiastically supporting the UK war aims of restoring Belgium, after it had been occupied by Germany, together with generalised statements that Britain was standing up for the cause of good. In September 1914, Kipling was asked by the government to write propaganda, an offer that he accepted.[73] Kipling's pamphlets and stories were popular with the British people during the war, his major themes being to glorify the British military as the place for heroic men to be, while citing German atrocities against Belgian civilians and the stories of women brutalised by a horrific war unleashed by Germany, yet surviving and triumphing in spite of their suffering.[73] Kipling was enraged by reports of the Rape of Belgium together with the sinking of the RMS Lusitania in 1915, which he saw as a deeply inhumane act, which led him to see the war as a crusade for civilisation against barbarism.[74] In a 1915 speech, Kipling declared, "There was no crime, no cruelty, no abomination that the mind of men can conceive of which the German has not perpetrated, is not perpetrating, and will not perpetrate if he is allowed to go on.... Today, there are only two divisions in the world... human beings and Germans."[74] Alongside his passionate antipathy towards Germany, Kipling was privately deeply critical of how the war was being fought by the British Army, complaining as early as October 1914 that Germany should have been defeated by now, and something must be wrong with the British Army.[75] Kipling, who was shocked by the heavy losses that the British Expeditionary Force had taken by the autumn of 1914, blamed the entire pre-war generation of British politicians who, he argued, had failed to learn the lessons of the Boer War. Thus thousands of British soldiers were now paying with their lives for their failure in the fields of France and Belgium.[75] Kipling had scorn for men who shirked duty in the First World War. In "The New Army in Training"[76] (1915), Kipling concluded by saying: This much we can realise, even though we are so close to it, the old safe instinct saves us from triumph and exultation. But what will be the position in years to come of the young man who has deliberately elected to outcaste himself from this all-embracing brotherhood? What of his family, and, above all, what of his descendants, when the books have been closed and the last balance struck of sacrifice and sorrow in every hamlet, village, parish, suburb, city, shire, district, province, and Dominion throughout the Empire? In 1914, Kipling was one of 53 leading British authors — a number that included H. G. Wells, Arthur Conan Doyle and Thomas Hardy — who signed their names to the “Authors’ Declaration.” This manifesto declared that the German invasion of Belgium had been a brutal crime, and that Britain “could not without dishonour have refused to take part in the present war.”[77] Death of John Kipling[edit] 2nd Lt John Kipling Memorial to 2nd Lt John Kipling in Burwash Parish Church, Sussex, England Kipling's son John was killed in action at the Battle of Loos in September 1915, at age 18. John initially wanted to join the Royal Navy, but having had his application turned down after a failed medical examination due to poor eyesight, he opted to apply for military service as an army officer. Again, his eyesight was an issue during the medical examination. In fact, he tried twice to enlist, but was rejected. His father had been lifelong friends with Lord Roberts, former commander-in-chief of the British Army, and colonel of the Irish Guards, and at Rudyard's request, John was accepted into the Irish Guards.[73] John Kipling was sent to Loos two days into the battle in a reinforcement contingent. He was last seen stumbling through the mud blindly, with a possible facial injury. A body identified as his was found in 1992, although that identification has been challenged.[78][79][80] In 2015, the Commonwealth War Grave Commission confirmed that it had correctly identified the burial place of John Kipling;[81] they record his date of death as 27 September 1915, and that he is buried at St Mary's A.D.S. Cemetery, Haisnes.[82] After his son's death, in a poem titled "Epitaphs of the War," Kipling wrote "If any question why we died / Tell them, because our fathers lied." Critics have speculated that these words may express Kipling's guilt over his role in arranging John's commission.[83] Professor Tracy Bilsing contends that the line refers to Kipling's disgust that British leaders failed to learn the lessons of the Boer War, and were unprepared for the struggle with Germany in 1914, with the "lie" of the "fathers" being that the British Army was prepared for any war when it was not.[73] John's death has been linked to Kipling's 1916 poem "My Boy Jack," notably in the play My Boy Jack and its subsequent television adaptation, along with the documentary Rudyard Kipling: A Remembrance Tale. However, the poem was originally published at the head of a story about the Battle of Jutland and appears to refer to a death at sea; the "Jack" referred to is probably a generic "Jack Tar." [84] In the Kipling family, Jack was the name of the family dog, while John Kipling was always John, making the identification of the protagonist of "My Boy Jack" with John Kipling somewhat questionable. However, Kipling was indeed emotionally devastated by the death of his son. He is said to have assuaged his grief by reading the novels of Jane Austen aloud to his wife and daughter.[85] During the war, he wrote a booklet The Fringes of the Fleet[86] containing essays and poems on various nautical subjects of the war. Some of these were set to music by the English composer Edward Elgar. Kipling became friends with a French soldier named Maurice Hammoneau, whose life had been saved in the First World War when his copy of Kim, which he had in his left breast pocket, stopped a bullet. Hammoneau presented Kipling with the book, with bullet still embedded, and his Croix de Guerre as a token of gratitude. They continued to correspond, and when Hammoneau had a son, Kipling insisted on returning the book and medal.[87] On 1 August 1918, the poem "The Old Volunteer" appeared under his name in The Times. The next day, he wrote to the newspaper to disclaim authorship and a correction appeared. Although The Times employed a private detective to investigate, the detective appears to have suspected Kipling himself of being the author, and the identity of the hoaxer was never established.[88] After the war (1918–1936)[edit] Kipling, aged 60, on the cover of Time magazine, 27 September 1926. Partly in response to John's death, Kipling joined Sir Fabian Ware's Imperial War Graves Commission (now the Commonwealth War Graves Commission), the group responsible for the garden-like British war graves that can be found to this day dotted along the former Western Front and the other places in the world where British Empire troops lie buried. His main contributions to the project were his selection of the biblical phrase, "Their Name Liveth For Evermore" (Ecclesiasticus 44.14, KJV), found on the Stones of Remembrance in larger war cemeteries, and his suggestion of the phrase "Known unto God" for the gravestones of unidentified servicemen. He also chose the inscription "The Glorious Dead" on the Cenotaph, Whitehall, London. Additionally, he wrote a two-volume history of the Irish Guards, his son's regiment, published in 1923 and seen as one of the finest examples of regimental history.[89] Kipling's short story "The Gardener" depicts visits to the war cemeteries, and the poem "The King's Pilgrimage" (1922) a journey which King George V made, touring the cemeteries and memorials under construction by the Imperial War Graves Commission. With the increasing popularity of the automobile, Kipling became a motoring correspondent for the British press, writing enthusiastically of trips around England and abroad, though he was usually driven by a chauffeur. After the war, Kipling was sceptical of the Fourteen Points and the League of Nations, but had hopes that the United States would abandon isolationism and the post-war world be dominated by an Anglo-French-American alliance.[90] He hoped the United States would take on a League of Nations mandate for Armenia as the best way of preventing isolationism, and hoped that Theodore Roosevelt, whom Kipling admired, would again become president.[90] Kipling was saddened by Roosevelt's death in 1919, believing him to be the only American politician capable of keeping the United States in the "game" of world politics.[91] Kipling was hostile towards communism, writing of the Bolshevik take-over in 1917 that one sixth of the world had "passed bodily out of civilization."[92] In a 1918 poem, Kipling wrote of Soviet Russia that everything good in Russia had been destroyed by the Bolsheviks – all that was left was "the sound of weeping and the sight of burning fire, and the shadow of a people trampled into the mire." [92] In 1920, Kipling co-founded the Liberty League[93] with Haggard and Lord Sydenham. This short-lived enterprise focused on promoting classic liberal ideals as a response to the rising power of communist tendencies within Great Britain, or as Kipling put it, "to combat the advance of Bolshevism." [94][95] Kipling (second from left) as rector of the University of St Andrews, Scotland in 1923 In 1922, Kipling, having referred to the work of engineers in some of his poems, such as "The Sons of Martha," "Sappers," and "McAndrew's Hymn," [96] and in other writings, including short-story anthologies such as The Day's Work,[97] was asked by a University of Toronto civil engineering professor, Herbert E. T. Haultain, for assistance in developing a dignified obligation and ceremony for graduating engineering students. Kipling was enthusiastic in his response and shortly produced both, formally titled "The Ritual of the Calling of an Engineer." Today engineering graduates all across Canada are presented with an iron ring at a ceremony to remind them of their obligation to society.[98][99] In 1922 Kipling became Lord Rector of St Andrews University in Scotland, a three-year position. Kipling, as a Francophile, argued strongly for an Anglo-French alliance to uphold the peace, calling Britain and France in 1920 the "twin fortresses of European civilization." [100] Similarly, Kipling repeatedly warned against revising the Treaty of Versailles in Germany's favour, which he predicted would lead to a new world war.[100] An admirer of Raymond Poincaré, Kipling was one of few British intellectuals who supported the French Occupation of the Ruhr in 1923, at a time when the British government and most public opinion was against the French position.[101] In contrast to the popular British view of Poincaré as a cruel bully intent on impoverishing Germany with unreasonable reparations, Kipling argued that he was rightfully trying to preserve France as a great power in the face of an unfavourable situation.[101] Kipling argued that even before 1914, Germany's larger economy and higher birth rate had made that country stronger than France; with much of France devastated by war and the French suffering heavy losses meant that its low birth rate would give it trouble, while Germany was mostly undamaged and still with a higher birth rate. So he reasoned that the future would bring German domination if Versailles were revised in Germany's favour, and it was madness for Britain to press France to do so.[101] Kipling late in his life, portrait by Elliott & Fry. In 1924, Kipling was opposed to the Labour government of Ramsay MacDonald as "Bolshevism without bullets." He believed that Labour was a communist front organisation, and "excited orders and instructions from Moscow" would expose Labour as such to the British people.[102] Kipling's views were on the right. Though he admired Benito Mussolini to some extent in the 1920s, he was against fascism, calling Oswald Mosley was "a bounder and an arriviste." By 1935, he was calling Mussolini a deranged and dangerous egomaniac and in 1933 wrote, "The Hitlerites are out for blood." [103] Despite his anti-communism, the first major translations of Kipling into Russian took place under Lenin's rule in the early 1920s, and Kipling was popular with Russian readers in the interwar period. Many younger Russian poets and writers, such as Konstantin Simonov, were influenced by him.[104] Kipling's clarity of style, use of colloquial language and employment of rhythm and rhyme were seen as major innovations in poetry that appealed to many younger Russian poets.[105] Though it was obligatory for Soviet journals to begin translations of Kipling with an attack on him as a "fascist" and an "imperialist," such was Kipling's popularity with Russian readers that his works were not banned in the Soviet Union until 1939, with the signing of the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact.[104] The ban was lifted in 1941 after Operation Barbarossa, when Britain become a Soviet ally, but imposed for good with the Cold War in 1946.[106] A left-facing swastika in 1911, a symbol of good luck Covers of two of Kipling's books from 1919 (l) and 1930 (r) showing the removal of the swastika Many older editions of Rudyard Kipling's books have a swastika printed on the cover, associated with a picture of an elephant carrying a lotus flower, reflecting the influence of Indian culture. Kipling's use of the swastika was based on the Indian sun symbol conferring good luck and the Sanskrit word meaning "fortunate" or "well-being." [107] He used the swastika symbol in both right and left-facing forms, and it was in general use by others at the time.[108][109] In a note to Edward Bok after the death of Lockwood Kipling in 1911, Rudyard said: "I am sending with this for your acceptance, as some little memory of my father to whom you were so kind, the original of one of the plaques that he used to make for me. I thought it being the Swastika would be appropriate for your Swastika. May it bring you even more good fortune."[107] Once the Nazis came to power and usurped the swastika, Kipling ordered that it should no longer adorn his books.[107] Less than a year before his death, Kipling gave a speech (titled "An Undefended Island") to the Royal Society of St George on 6 May 1935, warning of the danger which Nazi Germany posed to Britain.[110] Kipling scripted the first Royal Christmas Message, delivered via the BBC's Empire Service by George V in 1932.[111][112] In 1934, he published a short story in The Strand Magazine, "Proofs of Holy Writ," postulating that William Shakespeare had helped to polish the prose of the King James Bible.[113] Death[edit] Kipling kept writing until the early 1930s, but at a slower pace and with less success than before. On the night of 12 January 1936, he suffered a haemorrhage in his small intestine. He underwent surgery, but died at Middlesex Hospital less than a week later on 18 January 1936, at the age of 70, of a perforated duodenal ulcer.[114][115][116] His death had previously been incorrectly announced in a magazine, to which he wrote, "I've just read that I am dead. Don't forget to delete me from your list of subscribers."[117] The pallbearers at the funeral included Kipling's cousin, Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin, and the marble casket was covered by a Union Jack.[118] Kipling was cremated at Golders Green Crematorium in north-west London, and his ashes interred at Poets' Corner, part of the South Transept of Westminster Abbey, next to the graves of Charles Dickens and Thomas Hardy.[118] Kipling's will was proven on 6 April, with his estate valued at £168,141 2s. 11d. (roughly equivalent to £11,508,703 in 2019[119]).[120] Legacy[edit] In 2010, the International Astronomical Union approved that a crater on the planet Mercury should be named after Kipling – one of ten newly discovered impact craters observed by the MESSENGER spacecraft in 2008–2009.[121] In 2012, an extinct species of crocodile, Goniopholis kiplingi, was named in his honour "in recognition for his enthusiasm for natural sciences." [122] More than 50 unpublished poems by Kipling, discovered by the American scholar Thomas Pinney, were released for the first time in March 2013.[123] Kipling's writing has strongly influenced that of others. His stories for adults remain in print and have garnered high praise from writers as different as Poul Anderson, Jorge Luis Borges, and Randall Jarrell, who wrote: "After you have read Kipling's fifty or seventy-five best stories you realize that few men have written this many stories of this much merit, and that very few have written more and better stories."[124] His children's stories remain popular and his Jungle Books made into several films. The first was made by producer Alexander Korda. Other films have been produced by The Walt Disney Company. A number of his poems were set to music by Percy Grainger. A series of short films based on some of his stories was broadcast by the BBC in 1964.[125] Kipling's work is still popular today. The poet T.S. Eliot edited A Choice of Kipling's Verse (1941) with an introductory essay.[126] Eliot was aware of the complaints that had been levelled against Kipling and he dismissed them one by one: that Kipling is "a Tory" using his verse to transmit right wing political views, or "a journalist" pandering to popular taste; while Eliot writes: "I cannot find any justification for the charge that he held a doctrine of race superiority."[127] Eliot finds instead: An immense gift for using words, an amazing curiosity and power of observation with his mind and with all his senses, the mask of the entertainer, and beyond that a queer gift of second sight, of transmitting messages from elsewhere, a gift so disconcerting when we are made aware of it that thenceforth we are never sure when it is not present: all this makes Kipling a writer impossible wholly to understand and quite impossible to belittle. — T.S. Eliot[128] Of Kipling's verse, such as his Barrack-Room Ballads, Eliot writes "of a number of poets who have written great poetry, only... a very few whom I should call great verse writers. And unless I am mistaken, Kipling's position in this class is not only high, but unique."[129] In response to Eliot, George Orwell wrote a long consideration of Kipling's work for Horizon in 1942, noting that although as a "jingo imperialist" Kipling was "morally insensitive and aesthetically disgusting," his work had many qualities which ensured that while "every enlightened person has despised him... nine-tenths of those enlightened persons are forgotten and Kipling is in some sense still there.": One reason for Kipling's power [was] his sense of responsibility, which made it possible for him to have a world-view, even though it happened to be a false one. Although he had no direct connexion with any political party, Kipling was a Conservative, a thing that does not exist nowadays. Those who now call themselves Conservatives are either Liberals, Fascists or the accomplices of Fascists. He identified himself with the ruling power and not with the opposition. In a gifted writer this seems to us strange and even disgusting, but it did have the advantage of giving Kipling a certain grip on reality. The ruling power is always faced with the question, 'In such and such circumstances, what would you do?', whereas the opposition is not obliged to take responsibility or make any real decisions. Where it is a permanent and pensioned opposition, as in England, the quality of its thought deteriorates accordingly. Moreover, anyone who starts out with a pessimistic, reactionary view of life tends to be justified by events, for Utopia never arrives and 'the gods of the copybook headings', as Kipling himself put it, always return. Kipling sold out to the British governing class, not financially but emotionally. This warped his political judgement, for the British ruling class were not what he imagined, and it led him into abysses of folly and snobbery, but he gained a corresponding advantage from having at least tried to imagine what action and responsibility are like. It is a great thing in his favour that he is not witty, not 'daring', has no wish to épater les bourgeois. He dealt largely in platitudes, and since we live in a world of platitudes, much of what he said sticks. Even his worst follies seem less shallow and less irritating than the 'enlightened' utterances of the same period, such as Wilde's epigrams or the collection of cracker-mottoes at the end of Man and Superman. — George Orwell[130] In 1939, the poet W.H. Auden celebrated Kipling in a similarly ambiguous way in his elegy for William Butler Yeats. Auden deleted this section from more recent editions of his poems. Time, that is intolerant Of the brave and innocent, And indifferent in a week To a beautiful physique, Worships language, and forgives Everyone by whom it lives; Pardons cowardice, conceit, Lays its honours at his feet. Time, that with this strange excuse, Pardons Kipling and his views, And will pardon Paul Claudel, Pardons him for writing well.[131] The poet Alison Brackenbury writes "Kipling is poetry's Dickens, an outsider and journalist with an unrivalled ear for sound and speech."[132] The English folk singer Peter Bellamy was a lover of Kipling's poetry, much of which he believed to have been influenced by English traditional folk forms. He recorded several albums of Kipling's verse set to traditional airs, or to tunes of his own composition written in traditional style.[133] However, in the case of the bawdy folk song, "The Bastard King of England," which is commonly credited to Kipling, it is believed that the song is actually misattributed.[134] Kipling often is quoted in discussions of contemporary British political and social issues. In 1911, Kipling wrote the poem "The Reeds of Runnymede" that celebrated Magna Carta, and summoned up a vision of the "stubborn Englishry" determined to defend their rights. In 1996, the following verses of the poem were quoted by former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher warning against the encroachment of the European Union on national sovereignty: At Runnymede, at Runnymede, Oh, hear the reeds at Runnymede: ‘You musn’t sell, delay, deny, A freeman’s right or liberty. It wakes the stubborn Englishry, We saw ’em roused at Runnymede! … And still when Mob or Monarch lays Too rude a hand on English ways, The whisper wakes, the shudder plays, Across the reeds at Runnymede. And Thames, that knows the mood of kings, And crowds and priests and suchlike things, Rolls deep and dreadful as he brings Their warning down from Runnymede![135] Political singer-songwriter Billy Bragg, who attempts to build a left-wing English nationalism in contrast with the more common right-wing English nationalism, has attempted to 'reclaim' Kipling for an inclusive sense of Englishness.[136] Kipling's enduring relevance has been noted in the United States, as it has become involved in Afghanistan and other areas about which he wrote.[137][138][139] Links with camping and scouting[edit] In 1903, Kipling gave permission to Elizabeth Ford Holt to borrow themes from the Jungle Books to establish Camp Mowglis, a summer camp for boys on the shores of Newfound Lake in New Hampshire. Throughout their lives, Kipling and his wife Carrie maintained an active interest in Camp Mowglis, which still continues the traditions that Kipling inspired. Buildings at Mowglis have names such as Akela, Toomai, Baloo, and Panther. The campers are referred to as "the Pack," from the youngest "Cubs" to the oldest living in "Den."[140] Kipling's links with the Scouting movements were also strong. Robert Baden-Powell, founder of Scouting, used many themes from Jungle Book stories and Kim in setting up his junior Wolf Cubs. These ties still exist, such as the popularity of "Kim's Game." The movement is named after Mowgli's adopted wolf family, and adult helpers of Wolf Cub Packs take names from The Jungle Book, especially the adult leader called Akela after the leader of the Seeonee wolf pack.[141] Kipling's Burwash home[edit] Bateman's, Kipling's beloved home – which he referred to as "A good and peaceable place" – in Burwash, East Sussex, is now a public museum dedicated to the author[142] After the death of Kipling's wife in 1939, his house, Bateman's in Burwash, East Sussex, where he had lived from 1902 until 1936, was bequeathed to the National Trust. It is now a public museum dedicated to the author. Elsie Bambridge, his only child who lived to maturity, died childless in 1976, and bequeathed her copyrights to the National Trust, which in turn donated them to the University of Sussex to ensure better public access.[143] Novelist and poet Sir Kingsley Amis wrote a poem, "Kipling at Bateman's," after visiting Burwash (where Amis's father lived briefly in the 1960s) as part of a BBC television series on writers and their houses.[144] In 2003, actor Ralph Fiennes read excerpts from Kipling's works from the study in Bateman's, including The Jungle Book, Something of Myself, Kim, and The Just So Stories, and poems, including "If ..." and "My Boy Jack," for a CD published by the National Trust.[145][146] Reputation in India[edit] In modern-day India, whence he drew much of his material, Kipling's reputation remains controversial, especially among modern nationalists and some post-colonial critics. Rudyard Kipling was a prominent supporter of Colonel Reginald Dyer, who was responsible for the Jallianwala Bagh massacre in Amritsar (in the province of Punjab). Kipling called Dyer "the man who saved India" and initiated collections for the latter's homecoming prize.[147] However, Subhash Chopra writes in his book Kipling Sahib – the Raj Patriot that the benefit fund was started by The Morning Post newspaper, not by Kipling, and that Kipling made no contribution to the Dyer fund. While Kipling's name was conspicuously absent from the list of donors as published in The Morning Post, he clearly admired Dyer.[148] Other contemporary Indian intellectuals such as Ashis Nandy have taken a more nuanced view. Jawaharlal Nehru, the first prime minister of independent India, often described Kipling's novel Kim as one of his favourite books.[149][150] G.V. Desani, an Indian writer of fiction, had a more negative opinion of Kipling. He alludes to Kipling in his novel All About H. Hatterr: I happen to pick up R. Kipling's autobiographical Kim. Therein, this self-appointed whiteman's burden-bearing sherpa feller's stated how, in the Orient, blokes hit the road and think nothing of walking a thousand miles in search of something. Indian writer Khushwant Singh wrote in 2001 that he considers Kipling's "If—" "the essence of the message of The Gita in English," [151] referring to the Bhagavad Gita, an ancient Indian scripture. Indian writer R.K. Narayan said "Kipling, the supposed expert writer on India, showed a better understanding of the mind of the animals in the jungle than of the men in an Indian home or the marketplace."[152] The Indian politician and writer Sashi Tharoor commented "Kipling, that flatulent voice of Victorian imperialism, would wax eloquent on the noble duty to bring law to those without it".[153] In November 2007, it was announced that Kipling's birth home in the campus of the J. J. School of Art in Mumbai would be turned into a museum celebrating the author and his works.[154] Art[edit] Though best known as an author, Kipling was also an accomplished artist. Influenced by Aubrey Beardsley, Kipling produced many illustrations for his stories, e.g. Just So Stories, 1919.[155] Screen portrayals[edit] Reginald Sheffield portrayed Rudyard Kipling in Gunga Din (1939). Paul Scardon portrayed Rudyard Kipling in The Adventures of Mark Twain (1944). Christopher Plummer portrayed Rudyard Kipling in The Man Who Would Be King (1975). David Haig portrayed Rudyard Kipling in My Boy Jack (2007). Bibliography[edit] Main article: Rudyard Kipling bibliography Kipling's bibliography includes fiction (including novels and short stories), non-fiction, and poetry. Several of his works were collaborations. See also[edit] Poetry portal Biography portal Kipling Trail List of Nobel laureates in Literature HMS Birkenhead (1845) – ship mentioned in one of Kipling's poems References[edit] ^ The Times, (London) 18 January 1936, p. 12. ^ "The Man who would be King". Notes on the text by John McGivering. kiplingsociety.co.uk. ^ a b c d e Rutherford, Andrew (1987). General Preface to the Editions of Rudyard Kipling, in "Puck of Pook's Hill and Rewards and Fairies", by Rudyard Kipling. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-282575-5 ^ a b c d e Rutherford, Andrew (1987). Introduction to the Oxford World's Classics edition of 'Plain Tales from the Hills', by Rudyard Kipling. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-281652-7 ^ James Joyce considered Tolstoy, Kipling and D'Annunzio the "three writers of the nineteenth century who had the greatest natural talents", but that they "did not fulfill that promise". He also noted their "semi-fanatic ideas about religion, or about patriotism". Diary of David Fleischman, 21 July 1938, quoted in James Joyce by Richard Ellmann, p. 661, Oxford University Press (1983) ISBN 0-19-281465-6 ^ Alfred Nobel Foundation. "Who is the youngest ever to receive a Nobel Prize, and who is the oldest?". Nobelprize.com. p. 409. Archived from the original on 25 September 2006. Retrieved 30 September 2006. ^ Birkenhead, Lord. (1978). Rudyard Kipling, Appendix B, "Honours and Awards". Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London; Random House Inc., New York. ^ Lewis, Lisa. (1995). Introduction to the Oxford World"s Classics edition of "Just So Stories", by Rudyard Kipling. Oxford University Press. pp. xv–xlii. ISBN 0-19-282276-4 ^ Quigley, Isabel. (1987). Introduction to the Oxford World's Classics edition of "The Complete Stalky & Co.", by Rudyard Kipling. Oxford University Press. pp. xiii–xxviii. ISBN 0-19-281660-8 ^ Said, Edward. (1993). Culture and Imperialism. London: Chatto & Windus. p. 196. ISBN 0-679-75054-1. ^ Sandison, Alan. (1987). Introduction to the Oxford World's Classics edition of Kim, by Rudyard Kipling. Oxford University Press. pp. xiii–xxx. ISBN 0-19-281674-8 ^ Douglas Kerr, University of Hong Kong (30 May 2002). "Rudyard Kipling." The Literary Encyclopedia. The Literary Dictionary Company. 26 September 2006. ^ a b c d e Carrington, C.E. (Charles Edmund) (1955). Rudyard Kipling: His Life and Work. Macmillan & Co. ^ Flanders, Judith. (2005). A Circle of Sisters: Alice Kipling, Georgiana Burne-Jones, Agnes Poynter, and Louisa Baldwin. W. W. Norton and Company, New York. ISBN 0-393-05210-9 ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t Gilmour ^ "My Rival" 1885. Notes edited by John Radcliffe. kiplingsociety.co.uk ^ Gilmour, p. 32. ^ thepotteries.org (13 January 2002). "did you know..." The potteries.org. Retrieved 2 October 2006. ^ Ahmed, Zubair (27 November 2007). "Kipling's India home to become museum". BBC News. Retrieved 7 August 2015. ^ Sir J. J. College of Architecture (30 September 2006). "Campus". Sir J. J. College of Architecture, Mumbai. Archived from the original on 28 July 2011. Retrieved 2 October 2006. ^ Aklekar, Rajendra (12 August 2014). "Red tape keeps Kipling bungalow in disrepair". Mumbai Mirror. Retrieved 7 August 2015. ^ Kipling, Rudyard (1894) "To the City of Bombay", dedication to Seven Seas, Macmillan & Co. ^ Murphy, Bernice M. (21 June 1999). "Rudyard Kipling – A Brief Biography". School of English, The Queen's University of Belfast. Archived from the original on 14 November 2012. Retrieved 6 October 2006.CS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown (link) ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p Kipling, Rudyard (1935). "Something of Myself". Archived from the original on 23 February 2014. Retrieved 6 September 2008.CS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown (link) ^ Pinney, Thomas (2011) [2004]. "Kipling, (Joseph) Rudyard (1865–1936)". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/34334. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.) ^ Pinney, Thomas (1995). "A Very Young Person, Notes on the text". Cambridge University Press. Retrieved 6 March 2012. ^ a b c d Carpenter, Humphrey and Prichard, Mari. (1984). Oxford Companion to Children's Literature. Oxford University Press. pp. 296–297. ISBN 0192115820. ^ Chums, No. 256, Vol. V, 4 August 1897, p. 798. ^ Neelam, S (8 June 2008). "Rudyard Kipling's Allahabad bungalow in shambles". Hindustan Times. Retrieved 7 August 2015. ^ "Kipling, Rudyard – 1865–1936 – Homes & haunts – India – Allahabad (from the collection of William Carpenter)". Library of Congress US. Retrieved 7 August 2015. ^ a b Scott, p. 315 ^ a b Pinney, Thomas (editor). Letters of Rudyard Kipling, volume 1. Macmillan & Co., London and NY. ^ a b c d Hughes, James (2010). "Those Who Passed Through: Unusual Visits to Unlikely Places". New York History. 91 (2): 146–151. JSTOR 23185107. ^ Kipling, Rudyard (1956) Kipling: a selection of his stories and poems, Volume 2 p. 349 Doubleday, 1956 ^ Coates, John D. (1997). The Day's Work: Kipling and the Idea of Sacrifice. Fairleigh University Press. p. 130. ISBN 083863754X. ^ Kaplan, Robert D. (1989) Lahore as Kipling Knew It. The New York Times. Retrieved 9 March 2008 ^ Kipling, Rudyard (1996) Writings on Writing. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-44527-2, pp. 36 and 173 ^ Mallet, Phillip (2003). Rudyard Kipling: A Literary Life. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. ISBN 0-333-55721-2 ^ a b Ricketts, Harry (1999). Rudyard Kipling: A life. Carroll and Graf Publishers Inc., New York. ISBN 0-7867-0711-9 ^ Kipling, Rudyard. (1920). Letters of Travel (1892–1920). Macmillan & Co. ^ Nicolson, Adam (2001). Carrie Kipling 1862–1939: The Hated Wife. Faber & Faber, London. ISBN 0-571-20835-5 ^ a b Pinney, Thomas (editor). Letters of Rudyard Kipling, volume 2. Macmillan & Co. ^ Bliss Carman, et al., eds. The World’s Best Poetry. Volume I. Of Home: of Friendship. 1904. ^ Kipling, Rudyard. 1899. The White Man's Burden. Published simultaneously in The Times, London, and McClure's Magazine (US) 12 February 1899 ^ Snodgrass, Chris (2002). A Companion to Victorian Poetry. Blackwell, Oxford. ^ Kipling, Rudyard. (July 1897). "Recessional'". The Times, London ^ "Something of Myself", published 1935, South Africa Chapter ^ Reilly, Bernard F., Center for Research Libraries, Chicago, Illinois. email to Marion Wallace The Friend newspaper, Orange Free State, South Africa. ^ Carrington, C. E. (1955). The life of Rudyard Kipling, Doubleday & Co., Garden City, NY, p. 236. ^ Kipling, Rudyard (18 March 1900). "Kipling at Cape Town: Severe Arraignment of Treacherous Afrikanders and Demand for Condign Punishment By and By" (PDF). The New York Times. p. 21. ^ "Kipling.s Sussex: The Elms". Kipling.org. ^ "Bateman's: Jacobean house, home of Rudyard Kipling". National Trust.org. ^ C. E. Carrington (1955). The life of Rudyard Kipling, p. 286. ^ "Bateman's House". Nationaltrust.org.uk. 17 November 2005. Archived from the original on 17 January 2014. Retrieved 23 June 2010.CS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown (link) ^ "Writers History – Kipling Rudyard". writershistory.com. Archived from the original on 25 April 2015.CS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown (link) ^ Scott, pp. 318–319. ^ Leoshko, J. (2001). "What is in Kim? Rudyard Kipling and Tibetan Buddhist Traditions". South Asia Research. 21 (1): 51–75. doi:10.1177/026272800102100103. S2CID 145694033. ^ a b c d Gilmour, p. 206 ^ Bennett, Arnold (1917). Books and Persons Being Comments on a Past Epoch 1908–1911. London: Chatto & Windus. ^ Fred Lerner. "A Master of Our Art: Rudyard Kipling and modern Science Fiction". The Kipling Society. ^ Nomination Database. Nobelprize.org. Retrieved on 4 May 2017. ^ "Nobel Prize in Literature 1907 – presentation Speech". Nobelprize.org. ^ a b Emma Jones (2004). The Literary Companion. Robson. p. 25. ISBN 978-1-86105-798-3. ^ a b c MacKenzie, David & Dutil, Patrice (2011) Canada 1911: The Decisive Election that Shaped the Country. Toronto: Dundurn. p. 211. ISBN 1554889472. ^ Gilmour, p. 242. ^ a b c Gilmour, p. 243. ^ Gilmour, p. 241. ^ Gilmour, pp. 242–244. ^ a b c Gilmour, p. 244. ^ a b Mackey, Albert G. (1946). Encyclopedia of Freemasonry, Vol. 1. Chicago: The Masonic History Co. ^ Our brother Rudyard Kipling. Masonic lecture Archived 8 March 2012 at the Wayback Machine. Albertpike.wordpress.com (7 October 2011). Retrieved on 4 May 2017. ^ "Official Visit to Meridian Lodge No. 687" (PDF). 12 February 2014. ^ a b c d Bilsing, Tracey (Summer 2000). "The Process of Manufacture of Rudyard Kipling's Private Propaganda" (PDF). War Literature and the Arts. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 15 August 2013. ^ a b Gilmour, p. 250. ^ a b Gilmour, p. 251. ^ "Full text of 'The new army in training'". archive.org. ^ "1914 Authors' Manifesto Defending Britain's Involvement in WWI, Signed by H.G. Wells and Arthur Conan Doyle". Slate. Retrieved 27 February 2020. ^ Brown, Jonathan (28 August 2006). "The Great War and its aftermath: The son who haunted Kipling". The Independent. Retrieved 3 May 2018. It was only his father's intervention that allowed John Kipling to serve on the Western Front – and the poet never got over his death. ^ Quinlan, Mark (11 December 2007). "The controversy over John Kipling's burial place". War Memorials Archive Blog. Retrieved 3 May 2018. ^ "Solving the mystery of Rudyard Kipling's son". BBC News Magazine. 18 January 2016. Retrieved 3 May 2018. ^ McGreevy, Ronan (25 September 2015). "Grave of Rudyard Kipling's son correctly named, says authority". The Irish Times. Retrieved 3 May 2018. ^ "Casualty record: Lieutenant Kipling, John". Commonwealth War Graves Commission. Retrieved 3 May 2018. ^ Webb, George (1997). Foreword to: Kipling, Rudyard. The Irish Guards in the Great War. 2 vols. Spellmount. p. 9. ^ Southam, Brian (6 March 2010). "Notes on "My Boy Jack"". Retrieved 23 July 2011. ^ "The Many Lovers of Miss Jane Austen", BBC2 broadcast, 9 pm 23 December 2011 ^ The Fringes of the Fleet, Macmillan & Co., 1916. ^ Original correspondence between Kipling and Maurice Hammoneau and his son Jean Hammoneau concerning the affair at the Library of Congress under the title: How "Kim" saved the life of a French soldier: a remarkable series of autograph letters of Rudyard Kipling, with the soldier's Croix de Guerre, 1918–1933. LCCN 2007-566938. The library also possesses the actual French 389-page paperback edition of Kim that saved Hammoneau's life, LCCN 2007-581430 ^ Simmers, George (27 May 1918). "A Kipling Hoax". The Times. ^ Kipling, Rudyard (1923). The Irish Guards in the Great War. 2 vols. London. ^ a b Gilmour, p. 273. ^ Gilmour, pp. 273–274. ^ a b Hodgson, p. 1060. ^ "The Liberty League – a campaign against Bolshevism". jot101.com. Retrieved 2 January 2017. ^ Miller, David and Dinan, William (2008) A Century of Spin. Pluto Press. ISBN 978-0-7453-2688-7 ^ Gilmour, p. 275. ^ Kipling, Rudyard (1940) The Definitive edition of Rudyard Kipling's verse. Hodder & Stoughton. ^ "The day's work". Internet Archive. ^ "The Iron Ring". Ironring.ca. Retrieved 10 September 2008. ^ "The Calling of an Engineer". Ironring.ca. Retrieved 24 November 2012. ^ a b Gilmour, p. 300. ^ a b c Gilmour, pp. 300–301. ^ Gilmour, p. 293. ^ Gilmour, pp. 302 and 304. ^ a b Hodgson, pp. 1059–1060. ^ Hodgson, pp. 1062–1063. ^ Hodgson, p. 1059. ^ a b c Smith, Michael."Kipling and the Swastika". Kipling.org. ^ Schliemann, H, Troy and its remains, London: Murray, 1875, pp. 102, 119–120 ^ Boxer, Sarah (29 June 2000). "One of the World's Great Symbols Strives for a Comeback". Think Tank. The New York Times. Retrieved 7 May 2012. ^ Rudyard Kipling, War Stories and Poems (Oxford Paperbacks, 1999), pp. xxiv–xxv ^ Knight, Sam (17 March 2017). "'London Bridge is down': the secret plan for the days after the Queen's death". The Guardian. Retrieved 12 October 2017. ^ Rose, Kenneth (1983). King George V. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson. p. 394. ISBN 978-1-84212-001-9. ^ Short Stories from the Strand, The Folio Society, 1992 ^ Harry Ricketts (2000). Rudyard Kipling: A Life. Carroll & Graf. pp. 388–. ISBN 978-0-7867-0830-7. Retrieved 18 July 2013. ^ Rudyard Kipling's Waltzing Ghost: The Literary Heritage of Brown's Hotel, paragraph 11, Sandra Jackson-Opoku, Literary Traveler. ^ "Index entry". FreeBMD. ONS. Retrieved 15 November 2020. ^ Chernega, Carol (2011). A Dream House: Exploring the Literary Homes of England. p. 90. Dog Ear Publishing. ISBN 1457502461. ^ a b "History – Rudyard Kipling". Westminster abbey.org. ^ UK Retail Price Index inflation figures are based on data from Clark, Gregory (2017). "The Annual RPI and Average Earnings for Britain, 1209 to Present (New Series)". MeasuringWorth. Retrieved 2 February 2020. ^ "Kipling, Rudyard". probatesearchservice.gov. UK Government. 1936. Retrieved 11 August 2019. ^ – Article from the Red Orbit News network 16 March 2010. Retrieved 18 March 2010 ^ "Rudyard Kipling inspires naming of prehistoric crocodile". BBC Online. 20 March 2011. Retrieved 20 March 2012. ^ Flood, Alison (25 February 2013). "50 unseen Rudyard Kipling poems discovered". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 26 February 2013. ^ Jarrell, Randall (1999). "On Preparing to Read Kipling." No Other Book: Selected Essays. New York: HarperCollins. ^ The Indian Tales of Rudyard Kipling on IMDb ^ Eliot. Eliot's essay occupies 31 pages. ^ Eliot, p. 29. ^ Eliot, p. 22. ^ Eliot, p. 36. ^ Orwell, George (February 1942). "Rudyard Kipling". Horizon. Retrieved 4 December 2013. ^ Auden, W. H. "In Memory of W. B. Yeats". Selected Poems (PDF). Retrieved 28 December 2019. ^ Brackenbury, Alison. "Poetry Hero: Rudyard Kipling". Poetry News. The Poetry Society (Spring 2011). Archived from the original on 23 May 2013. Retrieved 11 February 2013. ^ Pareles, Jon (26 September 1991). "Peter Bellamy, 47; British Folk Singer Who Wrote Opera". The New York Times. Retrieved 15 July 2014. ^ "Bastard King of England, The". fresnostate.edu. ^ “Keith Joseph Memorial Lecture ("Liberty and Limited Government")”. Margaret Thatcher.org. 1996 Jan 11. ^ Billy Bragg. "Rhyme and Reason". BBC Radio 4. ^ World View: Is Afghanistan turning into another Vietnam?, Johnathan Power, The Citizen, 31 December 2010 ^ Is America waxing or waning?, Andrew Sullivan, The Atlantic, 12 December 2010 ^ Dufour, Steve. "Rudyard Kipling, official poet of the 911 War". 911poet.blogspot.com. ^ "History of Mowglis". Retrieved 26 November 2013. ^ "ScoutBase UK: The Library – Scouting history – Me Too! – The history of Cubbing in the United Kingdom 1916–present". Scoutbase.org.uk. Archived from the original on 25 November 2005. Retrieved 10 September 2008. ^ "History at Bateman's". National Trust. 22 February 2019. ^ Howard, Philip (19 September 1977) "University library to have Kipling papers". The Times", p. 1. ^ leader, Zachary (2007). The Life of Kingsley Amis. Vintage. pp. 704–705. ISBN 0375424989. ^ "Personal touch brings Kipling's Sussex home to life". The Argus. ^ "Rudyard Kipling Readings by Ralph Fiennes". Allmusic. ^ "History repeats itself, in stopping short". telegraphindia.com. ^ Subhash Chopra (2016). Kipling Sahib: the Raj patriot. London: New Millennium. ISBN 978-1858454405. ^ Globalization and educational rights: an intercivilizational analysis, Joel H. Spring, p. 137. ^ Post independence voices in South Asian writings, Malashri Lal, Alamgīr Hashmī, Victor J. Ramraj, 2001. ^ Khushwant Singh, Review of The Book of Prayer by Renuka Narayanan , 2001 ^ "When Malgudi man courted controversy". The Hindu. Retrieved 13 October 2014 ^ The Guardian, ("'But what about the railways ...?' The myth of Britain's gifts to India"), 8 March 2017 ^ Ahmed, Zubair (27 November 2007). "Kipling's India home to become museum". BBC News. Retrieved 9 August 2008. ^ “Illustrations by Rudyard Kipling”. Victorian Web. Retrieved 1 October 2020 Cited sources[edit] Eliot, T.S. (1941). A Choice of Kipling's Verse, made by T. S. Eliot with an essay on Rudyard Kipling. Faber and Faber. [ISBN missing] Gilmour, David (2003). The long recessional: the imperial life of Rudyard Kipling. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. ISBN 978-1466830004. Hodgson, Katherine (October 1998). "The Poetry of Rudyard Kipling in Soviet Russia". The Modern Language Review. 93 (4): 1058–1071. doi:10.2307/3736277. JSTOR 3736277. Scott, David (June 2011). "Kipling, the Orient, and Orientals: 'Orientalism' Reoriented?". Journal of World History. 22 (2): 299–328 [315]. doi:10.1353/jwh.2011.0036. JSTOR 23011713. S2CID 143705079. Further reading[edit] Biography and criticism Allen, Charles (2007). Kipling Sahib: India and the Making of Rudyard Kipling, Abacus. ISBN 978-0-349-11685-3 Bauer, Helen Pike (1994). Rudyard Kipling: A Study of the Short Fiction. New York: Twayne Birkenhead, Lord (Frederick Smith, 2nd Earl of Birkenhead) (1978). Rudyard Kipling. Worthing: Littlehampton Book Services Ltd. ISBN 978-0-297-77535-5 Carrington, Charles (1955). Rudyard Kipling: His Life and Work. London: Macmillan & Co. Croft-Cooke, Rupert (1948). Rudyard Kipling (London: Home & Van Thal Ltd.) David, C. (2007). Rudyard Kipling: a critical study, New Delhi: Anmol. ISBN 81-261-3101-2 Dillingham, William B (2005). Rudyard Kipling: Hell and Heroism New York: Palgrave Macmillan[ISBN missing] Gilbert, Elliot L. ed. (1965). Kipling and the Critics (New York: New York University Press) Gilmour, David (2003). The Long Recessional: The Imperial Life of Rudyard Kipling New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. ISBN 0-374-52896-9 Green, Roger Lancelyn, ed. (1971). Kipling: the Critical Heritage. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Gross, John, ed. (1972). Rudyard Kipling: the Man, his Work and his World. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson Harris, Brian (2014). The Surprising Mr Kipling: An anthology and reassessment of the poetry of Rudyard Kipling. CreateSpace. ISBN 978-1-4942-2194-2 Harris, Brian (2015). The Two Sided Man. CreateSpace. ISBN 1508712328. Kemp, Sandra (1988). Kipling's Hidden Narratives Oxford: Blackwell Lycett, Andrew (1999). Rudyard Kipling. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson. ISBN 0-297-81907-0 Lycett, Andrew (ed.) (2010). Kipling Abroad, I. B. Tauris. ISBN 978-1-84885-072-9 Mallett, Phillip (2003). Rudyard Kipling: A Literary Life Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan Montefiore, Jan (ed.) (2013). In Time's Eye: Essays on Rudyard Kipling. Manchester: Manchester University Press Narita, Tatsushi (2011). T. S. Eliot and his Youth as 'A Literary Columbus'. Nagoya: Kougaku Shuppan Nicolson, Adam (2001). Carrie Kipling 1862–1939 : The Hated Wife. Faber & Faber, London. ISBN 0-571-20835-5 Ricketts, Harry (2001). Rudyard Kipling: A Life. New York: Da Capo Press ISBN 0-7867-0830-1 Rooney, Caroline, and Kaori Nagai, eds. (2011). Kipling and Beyond: Patriotism, Globalisation, and Postcolonialism. Palgrave Macmillan; 214 pp.; scholarly essays on Kipling's "boy heroes of empire," Kipling and C.L.R. James, and Kipling and the new American empire, etc. Rutherford, Andrew, ed. (1964). Kipling's Mind and Art. Edinburgh and London: Oliver and Boyd Sergeant, David (2013). Kipling's Art of Fiction 1884–1901 Oxford: Oxford University Press Martin Seymour-Smith (1990). Rudyard Kipling,[ISBN missing] Shippey, Tom, "Rudyard Kipling," in: Cahier Calin: Makers of the Middle Ages. Essays in Honor of William Calin, ed. Richard Utz and Elizabeth Emery (Kalamazoo, MI: Studies in Medievalism, 2011), pp. 21–23. Tompkins, J.M.S. (1959). The Art of Rudyard Kipling. London: Methuen online edition Walsh, Sue (2010). Kipling's Children's Literature: Language, Identity, and Constructions of Childhood Farnham: Ashgate Wilson, Angus (1978). The Strange Ride of Rudyard Kipling: His Life and Works New York: The Viking Press. ISBN 0-670-67701-9 External links[edit] Rudyard Kiplingat Wikipedia's sister projects Media from Wikimedia Commons Quotations from Wikiquote Texts from Wikisource Data from Wikidata The Kipling Society website Rudyard Kipling on Nobelprize.org Rudyard Kipling at the Encyclopedia of Fantasy Rudyard Kipling at the Encyclopedia of Science Fiction Other information[edit] Library resources about Rudyard Kipling Resources in your library Resources in other libraries Works Works by Rudyard Kipling at Project Gutenberg List of works at the Works Catalogues of Laureates of the Nobel Prize for Literature Works by or about Rudyard Kipling at Internet Archive Works by Rudyard Kipling at LibriVox (public domain audiobooks) Works by Rudyard Kipling (not public domain in US, so not available on Wikisource) Resources The Rudyard Kipling Collection maintained by Marlboro College. The Rudyard Kipling Poems by Poemist. Rudyard Kipling: The Books I Leave Behind exhibition, related podcast, and digital images maintained by the Beinecke Rare Book & Manuscript Library, Yale University Rudyard Kipling at the Internet Speculative Fiction Database The Rudyard Kipling Collections From the Rare Book and Special Collections Division at the Library of Congress Archival material at Leeds University Library Newspaper clippings about Rudyard Kipling in the 20th Century Press Archives of the ZBW A. P. Watt & Son records relating to Rudyard Kipling. General Collection, Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library, Yale University. Academic offices Preceded by Sir J. M. Barrie Rector of the University of St Andrews 1922–1925 Succeeded by Fridtjof Nansen v t e Rudyard Kipling Novels The Light That Failed (1891) The Naulahka: A Story of West and East (co-author, Wolcott Balestier, 1892) Captains Courageous (1896) Kim (1901) Collections Plain Tales from the Hills (1888) Soldiers Three (1888) The Story of the Gadsbys (1888) In Black and White (1888) The Phantom 'Rickshaw and other Eerie Tales (1888) Under the Deodars (1888) Wee Willie Winkie and Other Child Stories (1888) From Sea to Sea and Other Sketches, Letters of Travel (1889) Barrack-Room Ballads (1892, poetry) Many Inventions (1893) The Jungle Book (1894) "Mowgli's Brothers" "Kaa's Hunting" "Tiger! Tiger!" "Rikki-Tikki-Tavi" The Second Jungle Book (1895) "Letting in the Jungle" "Red Dog" All the Mowgli Stories (c. 1895) The Seven Seas (1896, poetry) The Day's Work (1898) Stalky & Co. (1899) Just So Stories (1902) The Five Nations (1903, poetry) Puck of Pook's Hill (1906) Rewards and Fairies (1910) The Fringes of the Fleet (1915, non-fiction) Debits and Credits (1926) Limits and Renewals (1932) Rudyard Kipling's Verse: Definitive Edition (1940) A Choice of Kipling's Verse (by T. S. Eliot, 1941) Poems "The Absent-Minded Beggar" "The Ballad of the 'Clampherdown'" "The Ballad of East and West" "The Beginnings" "The Bell Buoy" "The Betrothed" "Big Steamers" "Boots" "Cold Iron" "Dane-geld" "Danny Deever" "A Death-Bed" "The Female of the Species" "Fuzzy-Wuzzy" "Gentleman ranker" "The Gods of the Copybook Headings" "Gunga Din" "Hymn Before Action" "If—" "In the Neolithic Age" "The King's Pilgrimage" "The Last of the Light Brigade" "The Lowestoft Boat" "Mandalay" "The Mary Gloster" "McAndrew's Hymn" "My Boy Jack" "Recessional" "A Song in Storm" "The Sons of Martha" "Submarines" "The Sweepers" "Tommy" "Ubique" "The White Man's Burden" "The Widow at Windsor" Short stories ".007" "The Arrest of Lieutenant Golightly" "Baa Baa, Black Sheep" "Bread upon the Waters" "The Broken Link Handicap" "The Butterfly that Stamped" "Consequences" "The Conversion of Aurelian McGoggin" "Cupid's Arrows" "The Devil and the Deep Sea" "The Drums of the Fore and Aft" "Fairy-Kist" "False Dawn" "A Germ-Destroyer" "His Chance in Life" "His Wedded Wife" "In the House of Suddhoo" "Kidnapped" "Learoyd, Mulvaney and Ortheris" "Lispeth" "The Man Who Would Be King" "A Matter of Fact" "Miss Youghal's Sais" "The Mother Hive" "Ortheris" "The Other Man" "The Rescue of Pluffles" "The Ship that Found Herself" "The Sing-Song of Old Man Kangaroo" "The Taking of Lungtungpen" "Three and – an Extra" "The Three Musketeers" "Thrown Away" "Toomai of the Elephants" "Watches of the Night" "Wireless" "Yoked with an Unbeliever" Related Bibliography Bateman's (house) Indian Railway Library Ritual of the Calling of an Engineer Iron Ring Law of the jungle Aerial Board of Control My Boy Jack (1997 play) Rudyard Kipling: A Remembrance Tale (2006 documentary) My Boy Jack (2007 film) Family Elsie Bambridge (daughter) John Kipling (son) John Lockwood Kipling (father) MacDonald sisters (mother's family) Stanley Baldwin (cousin) Georgiana Burne-Jones (aunt) Edward Burne-Jones (uncle) Philip Burne-Jones (cousin) Edward Poynter (uncle) Alfred Baldwin (uncle) v t e Laureates of the Nobel Prize in Literature 1901–1925 1901: Sully Prudhomme 1902: Theodor Mommsen 1903: Bjørnstjerne Bjørnson 1904: Frédéric Mistral / José Echegaray 1905: Henryk Sienkiewicz 1906: Giosuè Carducci 1907: Rudyard Kipling 1908: Rudolf Eucken 1909: Selma Lagerlöf 1910: Paul Heyse 1911: Maurice Maeterlinck 1912: Gerhart Hauptmann 1913: Rabindranath Tagore 1914 1915: Romain Rolland 1916: Verner von Heidenstam 1917: Karl Gjellerup / Henrik Pontoppidan 1918 1919: Carl Spitteler 1920: Knut Hamsun 1921: Anatole France 1922: Jacinto Benavente 1923: W. B. Yeats 1924: Władysław Reymont 1925: George Bernard Shaw 1926–1950 1926: Grazia Deledda 1927: Henri Bergson 1928: Sigrid Undset 1929: Thomas Mann 1930: Sinclair Lewis 1931: Erik Axel Karlfeldt 1932: John Galsworthy 1933: Ivan Bunin 1934: Luigi Pirandello 1935 1936: Eugene O'Neill 1937: Roger Martin du Gard 1938: Pearl S. Buck 1939: Frans Eemil Sillanpää 1940 1941 1942 1943 1944: Johannes V. Jensen 1945: Gabriela Mistral 1946: Hermann Hesse 1947: André Gide 1948: T. S. Eliot 1949: William Faulkner 1950: Bertrand Russell 1951–1975 1951: Pär Lagerkvist 1952: François Mauriac 1953: Winston Churchill 1954: Ernest Hemingway 1955: Halldór Laxness 1956: Juan Ramón Jiménez 1957: Albert Camus 1958: Boris Pasternak 1959: Salvatore Quasimodo 1960: Saint-John Perse 1961: Ivo Andrić 1962: John Steinbeck 1963: Giorgos Seferis 1964: Jean-Paul Sartre (declined award) 1965: Mikhail Sholokhov 1966: Shmuel Yosef Agnon / Nelly Sachs 1967: Miguel Ángel Asturias 1968: Yasunari Kawabata 1969: Samuel Beckett 1970: Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn 1971: Pablo Neruda 1972: Heinrich Böll 1973: Patrick White 1974: Eyvind Johnson / Harry Martinson 1975: Eugenio Montale 1976–2000 1976: Saul Bellow 1977: Vicente Aleixandre 1978: Isaac Bashevis Singer 1979: Odysseas Elytis 1980: Czesław Miłosz 1981: Elias Canetti 1982: Gabriel García Márquez 1983: William Golding 1984: Jaroslav Seifert 1985: Claude Simon 1986: Wole Soyinka 1987: Joseph Brodsky 1988: Naguib Mahfouz 1989: Camilo José Cela 1990: Octavio Paz 1991: Nadine Gordimer 1992: Derek Walcott 1993: Toni Morrison 1994: Kenzaburō Ōe 1995: Seamus Heaney 1996: Wisława Szymborska 1997: Dario Fo 1998: José Saramago 1999: Günter Grass 2000: Gao Xingjian 2001–present 2001: V. S. Naipaul 2002: Imre Kertész 2003: J. M. Coetzee 2004: Elfriede Jelinek 2005: Harold Pinter 2006: Orhan Pamuk 2007: Doris Lessing 2008: J. M. G. Le Clézio 2009: Herta Müller 2010: Mario Vargas Llosa 2011: Tomas Tranströmer 2012: Mo Yan 2013: Alice Munro 2014: Patrick Modiano 2015: Svetlana Alexievich 2016: Bob Dylan 2017: Kazuo Ishiguro 2018: Olga Tokarczuk 2019: Peter Handke 2020: Louise Glück v t e 1907 Nobel Prize laureates Chemistry Eduard Buchner (Germany) Literature Rudyard Kipling (Great Britain) Peace Ernesto Teodoro Moneta (Italy) Louis Renault (France) Physics Albert Abraham Michelson (United States/Poland) Physiology or Medicine Charles Louis Alphonse Laveran (France) Nobel Prize recipients 1990 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 2000 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 v t e Nobel Laureates in English Literature 1907: Kipling 1913: Tagore 1923: Yeats 1925: Shaw 1930: Lewis 1932: Galsworthy 1936: O'Neill 1938: Buck 1948: Eliot 1949: Faulkner 1950: Russell 1953: Churchill 1954: Hemingway 1962: Steinbeck 1969: Beckett 1973: White 1976: Bellow 1983: Golding 1986: Soyinka 1987: Brodsky 1991: Gordimer 1992: Walcott 1993: Morrison 1995: Heaney 2001: Naipaul 2003: Coetzee 2005: Pinter 2007: Lessing 2013: Munro 2016: Dylan 2017: Ishiguro Tagore, Beckett, and Brodsky also wrote in Bengali, French, and Russian languages respectively alongside English. v t e Rudyard Kipling's The Jungle Book Books The Jungle Book (1894) The Second Jungle Book (1895) All the Mowgli Stories (1933) Mowgli stories "Mowgli's Brothers" "Kaa's Hunting" "Tiger! Tiger!" "Letting in the Jungle" "Red Dog" Other stories "Rikki-Tikki-Tavi" "Toomai of the Elephants" Characters Mowgli Baloo Bagheera Akela Raksha Kaa Hathi Shere Khan Bandar-log King Louie Disney franchise Film The Jungle Book (1967) The Jungle Book (1994) The Jungle Book: Mowgli's Story (1998) The Jungle Book 2 (2003) The Jungle Book (2016) Television TaleSpin (1990–91) Jungle Cubs (1996–1998) Soundtrack "Colonel Hathi's March" "The Bare Necessities" "I Wan'na Be like You" "Trust in Me" "That's What Friends Are For" "My Own Home" "Jungle Jungle Baat Chali Hai" Video games The Jungle Book (1993) The Jungle Book Groove Party (2000) Other The Jungle Book: Alive with Magic Colonel Hathi's Pizza Outpost Other adaptations Live-action Film Elephant Boy (1937) Rudyard Kipling's Jungle Book (1942) The Second Jungle Book: Mowgli & Baloo (1997) Mowgli: Legend of the Jungle (2018) Animation Film Adventures of Mowgli (1967-1971) Television Mowgli's Brothers (1976) Jungle Book Shōnen Mowgli (1989–90) episodes Mowgli: The New Adventures of the Jungle Book (1998) The Jungle Book (2010–) Other The Third Jungle Book (1992) A dzsungel könyve Djungelboken Related Bagheera Fountain Law of the jungle The Jungle Book and Scouting The Wolf Cub's Handbook Mowgli syndrome The Graveyard Book (2008) v t e Rudyard Kipling's The Light That Failed Films The Light That Failed (1916) The Light That Failed (1923) The Light That Failed (1939) Phrases "Bite the bullet" "Sturgeon's law" v t e Victorian-era children's literature Authors Henry Cadwallader Adams R. M. Ballantyne Lucy Lyttelton Cameron Lewis Carroll Christabel Rose Coleridge Harry Collingwood Maria Edgeworth Evelyn Everett-Green Juliana Horatia Ewing Frederic W. Farrar G. E. Farrow Agnes Giberne Anna Maria Hall L. T. Meade G. A. Henty Frances Hodgson Burnett Thomas Hughes Richard Jefferies Charles Kingsley W. H. G. Kingston Rudyard Kipling Andrew Lang Frederick Marryat George MacDonald Mary Louisa Molesworth Kirk Munroe E. Nesbit Frances Mary Peard Beatrix Potter William Brighty Rands Talbot Baines Reed Elizabeth Missing Sewell Anna Sewell Mary Martha Sherwood Flora Annie Steel Robert Louis Stevenson Hesba Stretton Charlotte Elizabeth Tonna Charlotte Maria Tucker Charlotte Mary Yonge Illustrators Eleanor Vere Boyle Gordon Browne Randolph Caldecott Thomas Crane Walter Crane George Cruikshank Thomas Dalziel (engraver) Richard Doyle H. H. Emmerson Edmund Evans (engraver) Kate Greenaway Sydney Prior Hall Edward Lear Harold Robert Millar Arthur Rackham J. G. Sowerby Millicent Sowerby John Tenniel Books List of 19th-century British children's literature titles Types Toy book Publishers Blackie & Son Marcus Ward & Co. Frederick Warne & Co v t e Rectors of the University of St Andrews Sir Ralph Anstruther William Stirling-Maxwell John Stuart Mill J. A. Froude Lord Neaves Arthur Penrhyn Stanley Lord Selborne Sir Theodore Martin Lord Reay Arthur Balfour Marquess of Dufferin and Ava Marquess of Bute James Stuart Andrew Carnegie Baron Avebury Earl of Rosebery Earl of Aberdeen Sir Douglas Haig Sir J. M. Barrie Rudyard Kipling Fridtjof Nansen Sir Wilfred Grenfell Jan Smuts Guglielmo Marconi Lord MacGregor Mitchell Sir David Munro Sir George Cunningham Lord Burghley Earl of Crawford Viscount Kilmuir Baron Boothby Sir Charles P. Snow Sir John Rothenstein Sir Learie Constantine, Baron Constantine John Cleese Alan Coren Frank Muir Tim Brooke-Taylor Katharine Whitehorn Stanley Adams Nicholas Parsons Nicky Campbell Donald Findlay Andrew Neil Sir Clement Freud Simon Pepper Kevin Dunion Alistair Moffat Catherine Stihler Srđa Popović Leyla Hussein v t e Stanley Baldwin Premierships 1923–1924 1924–1929 1935–1937 General elections 1923 1924 1929 1931 1935 Constituency Bewdley Family Alfred Baldwin (father) Louisa Baldwin (mother) Lucy Baldwin (wife) Oliver Baldwin, 2nd Earl Baldwin of Bewdley (son) Arthur Baldwin, 3rd Earl Baldwin of Bewdley (son) Rudyard Kipling (cousin) Career Carlton Club meeting Power without responsibility speech National Government British Empire Economic Conference Appeasement Hoare–Laval Pact Edward VIII abdication crisis Honours Cultural depictions The Gathering Storm (TV, 1974) Edward & Mrs. Simpson (TV, 1978) Winston Churchill: The Wilderness Years (TV, 1981) The Woman He Loved (TV, 1988) The Gathering Storm (TV, 2002) Wallis & Edward (TV, 2005) The King's Speech (Film, 2010) W.E. (Film, 2011) See also Astley Hall Earl Baldwin of Bewdley Wilden Ironworks 1921 Bewdley by-election 1924 Prime Minister's Resignation Honours Authority control BIBSYS: 90088673 BNC: 000037839 BNE: XX1719503 BNF: cb13091505s (data) CANTIC: a10904220 CiNii: DA0046379X GND: 118562290 ICCU: IT\ICCU\CFIV\009380 ISNI: 0000 0001 2098 9213 LCCN: n79103792 LNB: 000012147 MBA: 7e2f7b7e-0441-4777-bd5e-b4c8d82eaccd NDL: 00445744 NKC: jn19990004353 NLA: 35272795 NLG: 62086 NLI: 000076070 NLK: KAC199634785 NLP: A16149403 NSK: 000040030 NTA: 069062315 RERO: 02-A003455393 SELIBR: 193587 SNAC: w6251gxf SUDOC: 026949962 Trove: 892127 VcBA: 495/111131 VIAF: 7524679 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n79103792 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rudyard_Kipling&oldid=996497794" Categories: Rudyard Kipling 1865 births 1936 deaths 19th-century British novelists 19th-century British short story writers 19th-century English poets 19th-century English writers 20th-century British male writers 20th-century English novelists 20th-century English poets British Nobel laureates British people of colonial India British World War I poets Burials at Westminster Abbey Commonwealth War Graves Commission Deaths from ulcers English Anglicans English anti-communists English children's writers English hymnwriters English male novelists English male short story writers English Nobel laureates English people of Scottish descent English science fiction writers English short story writers English-language poets from India Europeans in India Fellows of the Royal Society of Literature Freemasons of the United Grand Lodge of England Maritime writers Mythopoeic writers Nobel laureates in Literature People educated at United Services College People from Burwash People of the Second Boer War People of the Victorian era Rectors of the University of St Andrews Self-published authors Vermont culture Victorian novelists Writers from Lahore Writers from Mumbai Writers in British India Bishop's College School Faculty Writers who illustrated their own writing Members of the Athenaeum Club, London Weird fiction writers Hidden categories: CS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the ODNB CS1: Julian–Gregorian uncertainty Webarchive template wayback links Articles with short description Short description matches Wikidata EngvarB from August 2016 Use dmy dates from January 2020 Pages with missing ISBNs Pages using Sister project links with hidden wikidata Nobelprize template using Wikidata property P8024 Articles with Project Gutenberg links Articles with Internet Archive links Articles with LibriVox links Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNC identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CANTIC identifiers Wikipedia articles with CINII identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ICCU identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with LNB identifiers Wikipedia articles with MusicBrainz identifiers Wikipedia articles with NDL identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLG identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLI identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLP identifiers Wikipedia articles with NSK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with RERO identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SNAC-ID identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with Trove identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers AC with 28 elements Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikiquote Wikisource Languages Afrikaans አማርኛ العربية Aragonés Արեւմտահայերէն Asturianu Avañe'ẽ Azərbaycanca تۆرکجه বাংলা Bân-lâm-gú Башҡортса Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ भोजपुरी Български Bosanski Brezhoneg Català Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Føroyskt Français Frysk Gaeilge Gàidhlig Galego ગુજરાતી 한국어 Հայերեն हिन्दी Hrvatski Ido Ilokano Bahasa Indonesia Íslenska Italiano עברית Jawa ಕನ್ನಡ ქართული Қазақша Kiswahili Kotava Kurdî Кыргызча Latina Latviešu Lëtzebuergesch Lietuvių Lingua Franca Nova Lumbaart Magyar Македонски Malagasy മലയാളം मराठी مصرى Bahasa Melayu မြန်မာဘာသာ Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Norsk nynorsk Occitan Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча ਪੰਜਾਬੀ پنجابی Picard Piemontèis Plattdüütsch Polski Português Română Runa Simi Русский Sardu Scots Shqip Simple English Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Tagalog தமிழ் Татарча/tatarça తెలుగు ไทย Тоҷикӣ Türkçe Українська اردو Tiếng Việt West-Vlams Winaray 吴语 Yorùbá 粵語 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 26 December 2020, at 23:38 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2229 ---- Renaissance Latin - Wikipedia Renaissance Latin From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Renaissance Latin" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (May 2007) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) Renaissance Latin Mural of Dante in the Uffizi Gallery, by Andrea del Castagno, c. 1450. Native to No native speakers, used by the administrations and universities of numerous countries Region Europe Era Evolved from Medieval Latin in the 14th century; developed into New Latin by the 16th century Language family Indo-European Italic Latino-Faliscan Latin Renaissance Latin Early forms Old Latin Classical Latin Late Latin Medieval Latin Writing system Latin alphabet  Official status Official language in Most Roman Catholic countries Regulated by The community of scholars at the earliest universities Language codes ISO 639-3 – Glottolog None Renaissance Latin is a name given to the distinctive form of Latin style developed during the European Renaissance of the fourteenth to fifteenth centuries, particularly by the Renaissance humanism movement. Contents 1 Ad fontes 2 Renaissance Latin works and authors 2.1 14th century 2.2 15th century 3 References 4 Further reading 5 External links Ad fontes[edit] Ad fontes ("to the sources") was the general cry of the Renaissance humanists, and as such their Latin style sought to purge Latin of the medieval Latin vocabulary and stylistic accretions that it had acquired in the centuries after the fall of the Roman Empire. They looked to golden age Latin literature, and especially to Cicero in prose and Virgil in poetry, as the arbiters of Latin style. They abandoned the use of the sequence and other accentual forms of metre, and sought instead to revive the Greek formats that were used in Latin poetry during the Roman period. The humanists condemned the large body of medieval Latin literature as "Gothic"—for them, a term of abuse—and believed instead that only ancient Latin from the Roman period was "real Latin". Some 16th-century Ciceronian humanists also sought to purge written Latin of medieval developments in its orthography. They insisted, for example, that ae be written out in full wherever it occurred in classical Latin; medieval scribes often wrote e instead of ae. They were much more zealous than medieval Latin writers that t and c be distinguished; because the effects of palatalization made them homophones, medieval scribes often wrote, for example, eciam for etiam. Their reforms even affected handwriting; Humanists usually wrote Latin in a humanist minuscule script derived from Carolingian minuscule, the ultimate ancestor of most contemporary lower-case typefaces, avoiding the black-letter scripts used in the Middle Ages. This sort of writing was particularly vigilant in edited works, so that international colleagues could read them more easily, while in their own handwritten documents the Latin is usually written as it is pronounced in the vernacular. Therefore, the first generations of humanists did not dedicate much care to the orthography till the late sixteenth and seventeenth century. Erasmus proposed that the then-traditional pronunciations of Latin be abolished in favour of his reconstructed version of classical Latin pronunciation, even though one can deduce from his works that he himself used the ecclesiastical pronunciation. The humanist plan to remake Latin was largely successful, at least in education. Schools taught the humanistic spellings, and encouraged the study of the texts selected by the humanists, to the large exclusion of later Latin literature. On the other hand, while humanist Latin was an elegant literary language, it became much harder to write books about law, medicine, science or contemporary politics in Latin while observing all of the Humanists' norms about vocabulary purging and classical usage.[citation needed] Renaissance Latin gradually developed into the New Latin of the 16th–19th centuries, used as the language of choice for authors discussing subjects considered sufficiently important to merit an international (i.e., pan-European) audience. Renaissance Latin works and authors[edit] 14th century[edit] For 14th-century works and authors that are still medieval in outlook (practically all non-Italians), see Medieval Latin. 1359. Epistolæ familiares by Petrarch (1304–1374) 1360. Genealogia deorum gentilium by Giovanni Boccaccio (1313–1375) 15th century[edit] Incunables by language.[1] Latin dominated printed book production in the 15th century by a wide margin. 1409. Flos Duellatorum by Fiore dei Liberi 1425. Hermaphroditus by Antonio Beccadelli (1394–1471) 1441. De elegantiis Latinæ linguæ by Lorenzo Valla (1406–1457) 1442. Historia Florentini populi by Leonardo Bruni (c. 1370–1444) 1444. Historia de duobus amantibus by Æneas Sylvius Piccolomini, Pope Pius II (1405–1464) 1452. De re ædificatoria by Leone Battista Alberti (1404–1472) 1471. Contra amores by Bartolomeo Platina (1421–1481) 1479. De inventione dialectica by Rodolphus Agricola (1444–1485) 1481. Introductiones Latinæ by Antonio de Nebrija (1441–1522) 1486. De hominis dignitate by Giovanni Pico della Mirandola (1463–1494) 1491. Nutricia by Poliziano (1454–1494) Theologia Platonica de immortalitate animæ by Marsilio Ficino (1433–1499) Francesco Filelfo (1398–1481) References[edit] ^ "Incunabula Short Title Catalogue". British Library. Retrieved 2 March 2011. Further reading[edit] Cranz, F. Edward, Virginia Brown, and Paul Oslar Kristeller, eds. 1960–2003. Catalogus translationum et commentariorum: Medieval and Renaissance Latin Translations and Commentaries; Annotated Lists and Guides. 8 vols. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press. D’Amico, John F. 1984. “The Progress of Renaissance Latin Prose: The Case of Apuleianism.” Renaissance Quarterly 37: 351–92. Deitz, Luc. 2005. "The Tools of the Trade: A Few Remarks on Editing Renaissance Latin Texts." Humanistica Lovaniensia 54: 345-58. Hardie, Philip. 2013. “Shepherds’ Songs: Generic Variation in Renaissance Latin Epic.” In Generic Interfaces in Latin Literature: Encounters, Interactions and Transformations. Edited by Theodore D. Paphanghelis, Stephen J. Harrison, and Stavros Frangoulidis, 193–204. Berlin: De Gruyter. Houghton, L. B. T. 2013. “Renaissance Latin Love Elegy.” In The Cambridge Companion to Latin Love Elegy. Edited by Thea S. Thorsen, 290–305. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Lohr, C. H. 1974. “Renaissance Latin Aristotle Commentaries: Authors A–B.” Studies in the Renaissance 21: 228–89. McFarlane, I. D., ed. and trans. 1980. Renaissance Latin Poetry. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press. Parker, Holt. 2012. “Renaissance Latin Elegy.” In A Companion to Roman Love Elegy. Edited by Barbara K. Gold, 476–90. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Perosa, Alessandro, and John Sparrow, eds. 1979. Renaissance Latin Verse: An Anthology. London: Duckworth. External links[edit] Library resources about Renaissance Latin Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries An Analytic Bibliography of On-line Neo-Latin Titles (also Renaissance Latin). Neo-Latin Humanist Texts at DigitalBookIndex. René Hoven, Lexique de la prose latine de la Renaissance. Dictionary of Renaissance Latin from prose sources, with the collaboration of Laurent Grailet, Leiden, Brill, 2006 (2nd edition), 683 p. The Centre for Neo-Latin Studies, focusing on Irish Renaissance Latin. v t e Ages of Latin until 75 BC Old Latin 75 BC – 200 AD Classical Latin 200–900 Late Latin 900–1300 Medieval Latin 1300–1500 Renaissance Latin 1500–1900 New Latin 1900–present Contemporary Latin History of Latin Latin literature Vulgar Latin Ecclesiastical Latin Romance languages Latino sine flexione Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum Hiberno-Latin Judeo-Latin v t e Renaissance General Renaissance High Renaissance Greek scholars in the Renaissance Mannerism Northern Mannerism Renaissance studies By field Architecture Brick Central and Eastern Europe French Italian domes Palladian Plateresque Portuguese Purism Spanish Venetian Art Dance Humanism France Northern Europe Latin Literature Dutch French Spanish Magic Medicine Music Philosophy Platonism in the Renaissance Science Scientific Revolution Technology Theatre Warfare By region English Flemish French German Weser Italian Roman Venetian Northern Papal States Polish Portuguese Scottish Spanish Spanish Golden Age Lists Composers Figures Humanists Structures See also 12th century Medieval renaissances Renaissance reenactment Languages portal Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Renaissance_Latin&oldid=995070391" Categories: Latin language Forms of Latin Medieval languages Latin-language literature History of literature Languages attested from the 14th century 14th-century establishments in Europe Languages extinct in the 16th century 16th-century disestablishments in Europe Hidden categories: Articles needing additional references from May 2007 All articles needing additional references Use dmy dates from November 2015 Languages without Glottolog code Historical forms of languages with ISO codes Language articles with unreferenced extinction date All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from August 2016 Articles containing Latin-language text AC with 0 elements Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages العربية Čeština Deutsch Français Latina Русский Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 19 December 2020, at 01:50 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2238 ---- Patrician (ancient Rome) - Wikipedia Patrician (ancient Rome) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Hereditary nobility of ancient Rome Romulus and his brother, Remus, with the she-wolf. Romulus is credited with creating the patrician class. The patricians (from Latin: patricius) were originally a group of ruling class families in ancient Rome. The distinction was highly significant in the Roman Kingdom, and the early Republic, but its relevance waned after the Conflict of the Orders (494 BC to 287 BC). By the time of the late Republic and Empire, membership in the patriciate was of only nominal significance. The social structure of Ancient Rome revolved around the distinction between the patricians and the plebeians. The status of patricians gave them more political power than the plebeians. The relationship between the patricians and the plebeians eventually caused the Conflict of the Orders. This time period resulted in changing the social structure of Ancient Rome. After the Western Empire fell, the term "patrician" continued as a high honorary title in the Byzantine Empire. In the Holy Roman Empire and in many medieval Italian republics, medieval patrician classes were once again formally defined groups of leading Grand Burgher families, especially in Venice and Genoa. Subsequently "patrician" became a vague term used to refer to aristocrats and the higher bourgeoisie in many countries. The legacy of the Roman patrician and plebeian distinction lives on in modern society. Contents 1 Origin 2 Roman Republic and Empire 2.1 Status 2.2 Patricians vs. plebeians 2.3 Marriage 2.4 The Conflict of The Orders 2.5 Fading of distinction 2.6 Modern Day 2.7 Patrician families 2.7.1 Gentes maiores et minores 3 Late Roman and Byzantine periods 4 See also 5 References 6 Sources 7 Further reading 8 External links Origin[edit] According to Livy, the first 100 men appointed as senators by Romulus were referred to as "fathers" (Latin patres), and the descendants of those men became the patrician class. This fact is also included in an account by Cicero.[1] The appointment of these one hundred men into the senate gave them a noble status.[1] This noble status is what separated the patricians from the plebeians. Some accounts detail that the one hundred men were chosen because of their wisdom.[1] This would coincide with the idea that Ancient Rome was founded on a merit-based ideal.[1] According to other opinions, the patricians (patricii) were those who could point to fathers, i.e. those who were members of the clans (gentes) whose members originally comprised the whole citizen body.[2] Other noble families which came to Rome during the time of the kings were also admitted to the patriciate, including several who emigrated from Alba Longa, after that city was destroyed by Tullus Hostilius. The last-known instance of a gens being admitted to the patriciate prior to the 1st century BC was when the Claudii were added to the ranks of the patricians after coming to Rome in 504 BC, five years after the establishment of the Republic.[3][4][5][6] The criteria for why Romulus chose certain men for this class remains contested by academics and historians, but the importance of the patrician/ plebeian distinction is accounted by all as paramount to Ancient Roman society. The distinction between the noble class, the patricians, and the Roman populace, the plebeians, existed from the beginning of Ancient Rome.[7] This distinction became increasingly important in the society. The patricians were given noble status when named to the Senate, giving them wider political influence than the plebeians, at least in the times of the early Republic.[8] The patricians in Ancient Rome were of the same status as aristocrats in Greek society.[9] Being of the noble class meant that patricians were able to participate in government and politics, while the plebeians could not. This privilege was important in Ancient Roman history and ended up causing a large divide between the two classes. During the middle and late Republic, as this influence gradually eroded, plebeians were granted equal rights in most areas, and even greater in some. For example, only plebeians could serve as the Tribune of the Plebs. There were quotas for official offices. One of the two consulships was reserved for plebeians. Although being a patrician remained prestigious, it was of minimal practical importance. With the exception of some religious offices which were devoid of political power, plebeians were able to stand for all of the offices that were open to patricians. Plebeians of the senatorial class were no less wealthy than patricians at the height of the republic. Originally patrician, Publius Clodius Pulcher willingly arranged to be adopted by a plebeian family in order to qualify to be appointed as the Tribune of the Plebs. Roman Republic and Empire[edit] This article includes a list of general references, but it remains largely unverified because it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (April 2009) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) Status[edit] Patricians historically had more privileges and rights than plebeians. This status difference was marked at the beginning of the Republic: patricians were better represented in the Roman assemblies, only patricians could hold high political offices, such as dictator, consul, and censor, and all priesthoods (such as pontifex maximus) were closed to non-patricians. There was a belief that patricians communicated better with the Roman gods, so they alone could perform the sacred rites and take the auspices. Additionally, not only were the patricians of higher status in political offices but they also had the best land in Ancient Rome.[10] Having the best land would allow the patrician class to have more opportunities, such as being able to produce better agriculture. This view had political consequences, since in the beginning of the year or before a military campaign, Roman magistrates used to consult the gods. Livy reports that the first admission of plebeians into a priestly college happened in 300 BC with the passage of the Lex Ogulnia, when the college of Augurs raised their number from four to nine. After that, plebeians were accepted into the other religious colleges. By the end of the Republic, only priesthoods with limited political importance, such as the Salii, the Flamines, and the Rex Sacrorum, were filled exclusively by patricians. While it was not illegal for a plebeian to run for political office, a plebeian would have not have had the backing needed to win a seat.[11] Since society was organized in this way, the patrician class was essentially in complete control of Ancient Rome's government.[11] In Cassius' accounts of Ancient Rome, he details how important and advantaged the patrician class was over the plebeian class.[12] He indicates the status difference between patricians and plebeians by detailing about the specific shoes the patricians wore. Cassius states, "For the shoes worn by the patricians in the city were ornamented with laced straps and the design of the letter, to signify that they were descended from the original hundred men that had been senators."[12] It is clear through Cassius' account that these details mattered and represent the differentiation between classes. For more on Ancient Rome's social class distinction visit Social Class in Ancient Rome. Very few plebeian names appear in lists of Roman magistrates during the early Republic. Two laws passed during the fourth century BC began the gradual opening of magistrates to the plebeians: the Lex Licinia Sextia of 367 BC, which established the right of plebeians to hold the consulship; and the Genucian Law of 342 BC, which required that at least one of the consuls be a plebeian (although this law was frequently violated for several decades). Many of the ancient patrician gentes whose members appear in the founding legends of Rome disappeared as Rome acquired its empire, and new plebeian families rose to prominence. A number of patrician families such as the Horatii, Lucretii, Verginii and Menenii rarely appear in positions of importance during the later republic. Many old families had both patrician and plebeian branches, of which the patrician lines frequently faded into obscurity, and were eclipsed by their plebeian namesakes. The decline accelerated toward the end of the Republic, principally because of the civil wars, from the Social War to the proscriptions of the Triumvirs, which took a heavy toll on them. As a result, several illustrious patrician houses were on the verge of extinction during the 1st century BC, sometimes only surviving through adoptions, such as: Julii Caesares Manlii Torquatii Papirii Masones Postumii Albini Servilii Caepiones However, large gentes with multiple stirpes seem to have coped better; the Aemilii, Claudii, Cornelii, Fabii, Sulpicii, and Valerii all continued to thrive under the Principate. Patricians vs. plebeians[edit] The distinction between patricians and plebeians in Ancient Rome was based purely on birth. Although modern writers often portray patricians as rich and powerful families who managed to secure power over the less-fortunate plebeian families, plebeians and patricians among the senatorial class were equally wealthy. As civil rights for plebeians increased during the middle and late Roman Republic, many plebeian families had attained wealth and power while some traditionally patrician families had fallen into poverty and obscurity. However, no amount of wealth could change one's class.[13] Marriage[edit] A marriage between a patrician and a plebeian was the only way to legally integrate the two classes. However, once the Twelve Tables were written down, a law was written which made the marriage between the two classes illegal.[14] If a marriage was to occur between a patrician and a plebeian, the children of that marriage would then be given patrician status. This law was created to prevent the classes from mixing. In Ancient Rome women did not have power in the household. However, according to Mathisen, having a recognized marriage, so not illegally marrying into the other class, was important.[14] Having a legally recognized marriage ensured that the children born from the marriage were given Roman citizenship and any property they might inherit.[14] The Conflict of The Orders[edit] Eventually, the plebeians became unsatisfied with being the lower class and not having the same rights and privileges as the patricians.[15] This time in Roman history is called the Conflict of the Orders, which took place between 500-287 BCE.[15] Due to the patricians having the political status, the plebeian class had no representation in the government to advocate for their interests.[15] By not having anyone advocating for their interests, this also meant that the Plebeians did not know the laws they had to abide by.[15] Since the patricians were of high social status, they did not want to lose this status; they were not in agreement with changing the structure of society by giving plebeians more status.[15] Eventually, the plebeian class came together and created their own governing body, the Council of the Plebs.[15] Another advancement that came from the Conflict of the Orders was the twelve tables. At this time in Ancient Rome, the monarchy had been over thrown.[16] The plebeians wanted to know the laws, which resulted in the written form of laws: the Twelve Tables.[15] Even once these laws were written down, and the new Centuriate Assembly was created, the patrician class remained in power. The assembly separated citizens into classes, however, the top two class, Equestrians and Patricians, were able to control the majority of the vote.[15] This meant, that while the plebeians were able to vote, if the patrician classes voted together, they could control the vote.[15] Ancient Rome, according to Ralph Mathisen, author of Ancient Roman Civilization: History and Sources, made political reforms, such as the introduction of the Council of the Plebs and the Tribunes of the Plebs. These two political bodies were created to give the plebeians a voice. After the Conflict of the Orders, according to Mathisen, Plebeians were able to rise in politics and become members of the Senate, which used to be exclusively for patricians.[15] Fading of distinction[edit] A series of laws diminished the distinction between the two classes, including Lex Canuleia (445 BC; which allowed the marriage—ius connubii—between patricians and plebeians), Leges Licinae Sextiae (367 BC; which made restrictions on possession of public lands—ager publicus—and also made sure that one of the consuls was plebeian), Lex Ogulnia (300 BC; plebeians received access to priest posts), and Lex Hortensia (287 BC; verdicts of plebeian assemblies—plebiscita—now bind all people). Gradually, by the late Republic, most distinctions between patricians and plebeians had faded away.[17] Modern Day[edit] "Patrician" and "plebeian" are still used today to refer to groups of people of high and lower classes.[18] Patrician families[edit] The following gentes were regarded as patrician, although they may have had plebeian members or branches. Aebutia Aemilia Aquillia Atilia Claudia Cloelia Cornelia Curtia Fabia Foslia Furia Gegania Genucia Herminia Horatia Julia Lartia Lucretia Manlia Menenia Metilia Minucia Mucia Nautia Numicia Papiria Pinaria Pollia Postumia Potitia Quinctia Quinctilia Romilia Sempronia Sergia Servilia Sestia Siccia Sulpicia Tarpeia Tarquinia Tarquitia Tullia Valeria Verginia Veturia Vitellia Volumnia A number of other gentes originally belonged to the patricians but were known chiefly for their plebeian branches. Antonia Cassia Cominia Curiatia Hostilia Junia Marcia Gentes maiores et minores[edit] Among the patricians, certain families were known as the gentes maiores, the greatest or perhaps the most noble houses. The other patrician families were called the gentes minores. Whether this distinction had any legal significance is not known, but it has been suggested that the princeps senatus, or Speaker of the Senate, was traditionally chosen from the gentes maiores. No list of the gentes maiores has been discovered, and even their number is entirely unknown. It has been suggested that the Aemilii, Claudii, Cornelii, Fabii, Manlii, and Valerii were amongst them. The Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology suggests that the gentes maiores consisted of families that settled at Rome in the time of Romulus, or at least before the destruction of Alba Longa. The noble Alban families that settled in Rome in the time of Tullus Hostilius then formed the nucleus of the gentes minores. These included the Julii, Tulii, Servilii, Quinctii, Geganii, Curtii, and Cloelii.[4][19] However, Harper's Dictionary of Classical Antiquities suggests that the Alban families were also included among the gentes maiores, and that the gentes minores consisted of the families admitted to the patriciate under the Tarquins and in the early years of the Republic. In any case, the distinction cannot have been based entirely on priority, because the Claudii did not arrive at Rome until after the expulsion of the kings.[4][20][21][22] Late Roman and Byzantine periods[edit] Patrician status still carried a degree of prestige at the time of the early Roman Empire, and Roman emperors routinely elevated their supporters to the patrician caste en masse. This prestige gradually declined further, and by the end of the 3rd-century crisis patrician status, as it had been known in the Republic, ceased to have meaning in everyday life. The emperor Constantine the Great (r. 306–337) reintroduced the term as the empire's senior honorific title, not tied to any specific administrative position, and from the first limited to a very small number of holders.[23][24] The historian Zosimus states that in Constantine's time, the holders of the title ranked even above the praetorian prefects.[25] In the late Western Roman Empire, the title was sparingly used and retained its high prestige, being awarded, especially in the 5th century, to the powerful magistri militum who dominated the state, such as Stilicho, Constantius III, Flavius Aetius, Comes Bonifacius, and Ricimer.[23] The eastern emperor Zeno (r. 474–491) granted it to Odoacer to legitimize the latter's rule in Italy after his overthrow of the rebellious magister militum Orestes and his son Romulus Augustulus in 476. In the Eastern Empire, Theodosius II (r. 408–450) barred eunuchs from holding it, although this restriction had been overturned by the 6th century. Under Justinian I (r. 527–565), the title proliferated and was consequently somewhat devalued, as the emperor opened it up to all those above illustris rank, i.e. the majority of the Senate.[26] In the 8th century, the title was further lowered in the court order of precedence, coming after the magistros and the anthypatos. However it remained one of the highest in the imperial hierarchy until the 11th century, being awarded to the most important strategoi (provincial governors and generals) of the Empire.[23] In the court hierarchy, the eunuch patrikioi enjoyed higher precedence, coming before even the anthypatoi-Latn.[27] According to the late 9th-century Kletorologion, the insignia of the dignity were ivory inscribed tablets.[28] During the 11th century, the dignity of patrikios followed the fate of other titles: extensively awarded, it lost in status, and disappeared during the Komnenian period in the early 12th century.[23] The title of prōtopatrikios (πρωτοπατρίκιος, "first patrician") is also evidenced in the East from 367 to 711, possibly referring to the senior-most holder of the office and leader of the patrician order (taxis).[23][29] The feminine variant patrikia (πατρικία) denoted the spouses of patrikioi; it is not to be confused with the title of zostē patrikia ("girded patrikia"), which was a unique dignity conferred on the ladies-in-waiting of the empress.[23] The patrician title was occasionally used in Western Europe after the end of the Roman Empire; for instance, Pope Stephen II granted the title "Patricius of the Romans" to the Frankish ruler Pepin the Short.[23] The revival of patrician classes in medieval Italian city-states, and also north of the Alps, is covered in patricianship. See also[edit] Nobility Aristocracy References[edit] ^ a b c d Botsford, George Willis (1906). "The Social Composition of the Primitive Roman Populus". Political Science Quarterly. 21 (3): 498–526. doi:10.2307/2140599. ISSN 0032-3195. JSTOR 2140599. ^ Clay (1911), p. 931 cites Livy ii. 56 ^ Harper's Dictionary of Classical Literature and Antiquities, Second Edition, Harry Thurston Peck, Editor (1897) ^ a b c Oxford Classical Dictionary, 2nd ed. (1970). ^ Titus Livius, Ab Urbe Condita, Book II ^ Titus Livius, Ab Urbe Condita, Book I ^ Botsford, George Willis (1906). "The Social Composition of the Primitive Roman Populus". Political Science Quarterly. 21 (3): 498–526. doi:10.2307/2140599. ISSN 0032-3195. JSTOR 2140599. ^ Botsford, George Willis (1906). "The Social Composition of the Primitive Roman Populus". Political Science Quarterly. 21 (3): 498–526. doi:10.2307/2140599. ISSN 0032-3195. JSTOR 2140599. ^ Mathisen, Ralph W., 1947- author. (2019). Ancient Roman civilization : history and sources, 753 BCE to 640 CE. ISBN 978-0-19-084960-3. OCLC 1137838429.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) ^ Mathisen, Ralph W., 1947- author. (2019). Ancient Roman civilization : history and sources, 753 BCE to 640 CE. ISBN 978-0-19-084960-3. OCLC 1137838429.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) ^ a b Mathisen, Ralph W., 1947- author. (2019). Ancient Roman civilization : history and sources, 753 BCE to 640 CE. ISBN 978-0-19-084960-3. OCLC 1137838429.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) ^ a b "Cassius Dio — Fragments of Book 2". penelope.uchicago.edu. Retrieved 2020-02-23. ^ Mathisen, Ralph W., 1947- author. (2019). Ancient Roman civilization : history and sources, 753 BCE to 640 CE. ISBN 978-0-19-084960-3. OCLC 1137838429.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) ^ a b c Mathisen, Ralph W., 1947- author. (2019). Ancient Roman civilization : history and sources, 753 BCE to 640 CE. ISBN 978-0-19-084960-3. OCLC 1137838429.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) ^ a b c d e f g h i j Mathisen, Ralph W., 1947- author. (2019). Ancient Roman civilization : history and sources, 753 BCE to 640 CE. ISBN 978-0-19-084960-3. OCLC 1137838429.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) ^ Steinberg, Michael (1982). "The Twelve Tables and Their Origins: An Eighteenth-Century Debate". Journal of the History of Ideas. 43 (3): 379–396. doi:10.2307/2709429. ISSN 0022-5037. JSTOR 2709429. ^ Tellegen-Couperus, O. E. (1993). A short history of Roman law. Psychology Press. ^ Mathisen, Ralph W., 1947- author. (2019). Ancient Roman civilization : history and sources, 753 BCE to 640 CE. ISBN 978-0-19-084960-3. OCLC 1137838429.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) ^ Greenidge, Abel Hendy Jones, Roman Public Life (London: MacMillan, 1901), page 12. ^ Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology, William Smith, Editor. ^ Titus Livius, Ab Urbe Condita, i. 30, ii. 16. ^ Harper's Dictionary of Classical Literature and Antiquities, Second Edition, Harry Thurston Peck, Editor (1897) ^ a b c d e f g Kazhdan (1991), p. 1600 ^ Paul Stephenson, Constantine, Roman Emperor, Christian Victor, 2010:240. ^ Zosimus, Historia Nova, II.40.2 ^ Bury (1911), p. 27 ^ Bury (1911), p. 124 ^ Bury (1911), p. 22 ^ Bury (1911), p. 28 Sources[edit] Bury, John B. (1911). The Imperial Administrative System of the Ninth Century. Oxford University Publishing. Clay, Agnes Muriel (1911). "Patricians" . In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. 20 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 931–933. Kazhdan, Alexander, ed. (1991). Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-504652-6. Further reading[edit] Ferenczy, Endre. 1976. From the Patrician State to the Patricio-Plebeian State. Amsterdam: A. M. Hakkert. Forsythe, Gary (2005). A Critical History of Early Rome. University of California Press. Mitchell, Richard E. 1990. Patricians and plebeians: The origin of the Roman state. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press. Raaflaub, Kurt A., ed. 2004. Social struggles in Archaic Rome: New perspectives on the conflict of the orders. 2d ed. Oxford: Blackwell. Raaflaub, Kurt, ed. (2005). Social Struggles in Archaic Rome: New Perspectives on the Conflict of the Orders. Blackwell Publishing. Rosenstein, Nathan and Robert Morstein-Marx. 2010. A Companion to the Roman Republic. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell. Stewart, Roberta. 1998. Public office in early Rome: Ritual procedure and political practice. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press. Tatum, W. Jeffrey. 1999. The patrician tribune: Publius Clodius Pulcher. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press. Williamson, Callie. 2005. The laws of the Roman people: Public law in the expansion and decline of the Roman Republic. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press. External links[edit] Texts on Wikisource: "Patricians". Encyclopedia Americana. 1920. "Patrician". Collier's New Encyclopedia. 1921. v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films v t e Social class Status Stratum Economic classes Theories Gilbert model Marxian Mudsill theory New class Spoon class theory Weberian (three-component) Related​ topics Caste Chattering classes Class conflict Class discrimination Classicide Classless society Class society Euthenics Nouveau riche / Parvenu Poverty Ranked society Snobbery Social cleansing Social exclusion Social mobility Social orphan Social position Social stigma Subaltern By demographic By status Administrative detainee Alien illegal immigrant refugee Citizen dual or multiple native-born naturalized second-class Convicted Migrant worker Political prisoner Stateless Clique Adolescent By "collar" Blue Green Grey New Pink White By type Ruling Aristocracy Hanseaten Patrician Political Royal family Intellectual Clergy Knowledge worker Professor Warrior Harii Kshatriya Yadav Nair Chhetri Cossacks Hashashin Knight Vanniyar Samurai Cuāuh Ocēlōtl Spartiate Upper Bourgeoisie Business magnate Elite Gentry Lord Nobility Old money Overclass Robber baron Russian oligarch Seigneur Superclass Creative Bohemians Middle Lower middle class Upper middle class Bourgeoisie Petite bourgeoisie Working Working poor Proletariat Lumpenproletariat Under Ant tribe Rat tribe Commoner Outcast Outlaw / Prisoner Peasant / Serf Plebeian Slave Untouchable By country or region United States Affluence American Dream Conflict History Mobility Classes Upper Black Donor Gentry Middle Black Mexican-American Upper Middle Underprivileged Lower Under Income Household Inequality Personal Poverty Standard of living Education Homelessness Home-ownership Wealth Other regions​ or countries Africa Cambodia China Colombia Ecuador France Haiti India Iran Italy Nepal New Zealand Romania Sri Lanka Tibet United Kingdom United States Historic Ancient Greece Ancient Rome Aztec Ottoman Empire Soviet Union Pre-industrial East Asia Pre-industrial Europe Category Authority control GND: 4130531-0 LCCN: sh85141241 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Patrician_(ancient_Rome)&oldid=995599316" Categories: Roman patricians Social classes in ancient Rome Ancient Roman titles Hidden categories: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata Articles containing Latin-language text Articles lacking in-text citations from April 2009 All articles lacking in-text citations Articles containing Ancient Greek (to 1453)-language text Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica with Wikisource reference Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the Encyclopedia Americana with a Wikisource reference Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from Collier's Encyclopedia Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Afrikaans Alemannisch العربية Azərbaycanca Беларуская Български Boarisch Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français Frysk Galego 한국어 Հայերեն हिन्दी Hrvatski Ido Bahasa Indonesia Interlingua Italiano עברית ქართული Kurdî Latina Latviešu Lëtzebuergesch Lietuvių Magyar Македонски മലയാളം Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Occitan Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча Polski Português Română Русиньскый Русский Scots Seeltersk Simple English Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska ไทย Türkçe Українська Tiếng Việt 吴语 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 21 December 2020, at 22:50 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2239 ---- List of Roman dictators - Wikipedia List of Roman dictators From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search A list of all of the Roman dictators and magistri equitum known from ancient sources. In some cases the names or dates have been inferred by modern historians. Contents 1 Key to Latin terms and phrases 1.1 Other phrases 2 List of dictators and magistri equitum 2.1 6th and 5th centuries BC 2.2 4th century BC 2.3 3rd century BC 2.4 1st century BC 3 See also 4 Footnotes 5 References 6 Bibliography Key to Latin terms and phrases[edit] Roman dictators were usually appointed for a specific purpose, or causa, which limited the scope of their activities. The chief causae were rei gerundae (a general purpose, usually to lead an army in the field against a particular enemy), clavi figendi (an important religious rite involving the driving of a nail into the wall of the Temple of Jupiter Optimus Maximus), and comitiorum habendorum (the holding of the comitia to elect magistrates, when the consuls were unable to do so). Other causae included ludorum faciendorum, holding the Ludi Romani (Roman games), an important religious festival; ferarium constituendarum (establishing a religious festival in response to serious prodigies); seditionis sedandae (quelling sedition); and in one remarkable case, senatus legendi (filling up the ranks of the Senate after the Battle of Cannae). The causa given at the very end of the Republic for the dictatorships of Sulla and Caesar are completely novel, as the powers granted greatly exceeded those traditionally accorded a Roman dictator. By legibus faciendis et rei publicae constituendae causa, Sulla was empowered to rewrite the laws and revise the constitution of the Roman state; by dictator perpetuo rei publicae constituendae causa, Caesar was appointed dictator in perpetuity, and given the power to revise the constitution. The various causae may not have been legally distinguished from one another prior to 368 BC, when Publius Manlius Capitolinus was appointed dictator seditionis sedandae et rei gerundae causa. The precise formula of each causa later reported by ancient historians may only date to Manlius' dictatorship, in which case the causae attributed to earlier dictators must be later additions.[1] Other phrases[edit] abdicavit – abdicated, or resigned. mortuus est – died in office. non iniit – not inaugurated. occisus est – killed, slain. sine magistro equitum – without a magister equitum. Roman numerals given following a name indicate that the dictator or magister equitum for that year previously held the same magistracy. The causae listed in the table are based largely on T. R. S. Broughton's The Magistrates of the Roman Republic, reporting those given in ancient sources. For cases in which no causa is given, rei gerundae may usually be inferred. List of dictators and magistri equitum[edit] 6th and 5th centuries BC[edit] Year BC Year AUC Dictator Magister Equitum Notes 501 253 Titus Lartius Flavus[i] Spurius Cassius Viscellinus rei gerundae causa 496 255 Aulus Postumius Albus Regillensis Titus Aebutius Elva 494 260 Manius Valerius Volusus Maximus Quintus Servilius Priscus Structus 463 291 (Gaius Aemilius Mamercus)[ii] not recorded clavi figendi causa 458 296 Lucius Quinctius Cincinnatus Lucius Tarquitius Flaccus 439 315 Lucius Quinctius Cincinnatus II Gaius Servilius Structus Ahala 437 317 Mamercus Aemilius Mamercinus Lucius Quinctius Cincinnatus 435 319 Quintus Servilius Priscus Structus Fidenas Postumus Aebutius Elva Cornicen 434 320 Mamercus Aemilius Mamercinus II Aulus Postumius Tubertus 431 323 Aulus Postumius Tubertus Lucius Julius Iulus 426 328 Mamercus Aemilius Mamercinus III Aulus Cornelius Cossus 418 336 Quintus Servilius Priscus Structus Fidenas II Gaius Servilius Structus Axilla 408 346 Publius Cornelius Rutilus Cossus Gaius Servilius Structus Ahala 4th century BC[edit] Year BC Year AUC Dictator Magister Equitum Notes 396 358 Marcus Furius Camillus Publius Cornelius Maluginensis 390 364 Marcus Furius Camillus II Lucius Valerius Potitus 389 365 Marcus Furius Camillus III Gaius Servilius Ahala 385 369 Aulus Cornelius Cossus Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus Capitolinus 380 374 Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus Capitolinus Aulus Sempronius Atratinus 368 386 Marcus Furius Camillus IV Lucius Aemilius Mamercinus rei gerundae causa 368 386 Publius Manlius Capitolinus Gaius Licinius Calvus seditionis sedandae et rei gerundae causa 367 387 Marcus Furius Camillus V Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus Capitolinus rei gerundae causa 363 391 Lucius Manlius Capitolinus Imperiosus Lucius Pinarius Natta clavi figendi causa 362 392 Appius Claudius Crassus Regillensis Publius Cornelius Scapula? 361 393 Titus Quinctius Pennus Capitolinus Crispinus Servius Cornelius Maluginensis rei gerundae causa 360 394 Quintus Servilius Ahala Titus Quinctius Pennus Capitolinus Crispinus rei gerundae causa 358 396 Gaius Sulpicius Peticus Marcus Valerius Poplicola 356 398 Gaius Marcius Rutilus Gaius Plautius Proculus 353 401 Titus Manlius Imperiosus Torquatus Aulus Cornelius Cossus Arvina 352 402 Gaius Julius Iulus Lucius Aemilius Mamercinus 351 403 Marcus Fabius Ambustus Quintus Servilius Ahala comitiorum habendorum causa 350 404 Lucius Furius Camillus Publius Cornelius Scipio comitiorum habendorum causa 349 405 Titus Manlius Imperiosus Torquatus II Aulus Cornelius Cossus Arvina II comitiorum habendorum causa 348 406 (Gaius Claudius Crassinus Regillensis) (Gaius Livius Denter) comitiorum habendorum causa; names uncertain.[iii] 345 409 Lucius Furius Camillus II Gnaeus Manlius Capitolinus Imperiosus 344 410 Publius Valerius Poplicola Quintus Fabius Ambustus ferarium constituendarum causa 342 412 Marcus Valerius Corvus Lucius Aemilius Mamercinus Privernas 340 414 Lucius Papirius Crassus Lucius Papirius Cursor 339 415 Quintus Publilius Philo Decimus Junius Brutus Scaeva 337 417 Gaius Claudius Crassinus Regillensis Gaius Claudius Hortator abdicavit 335 419 Lucius Aemilius Mamercinus Privernas Quintus Publilius Philo comitiorum habendorum causa 334 to 333 420 to 421 Publius Cornelius Rufinus Marcus Antonius abdicavit; 333 the first of the "dictator years".[iv] 332 422 Marcus Papirius Crassus Publius Valerius Poplicola 331 423 Gnaeus Quinctilius Varus or  Gnaeus Quinctius Capitolinus Lucius Valerius Potitus clavi figendi causa 327 427 Marcus Claudius Marcellus Spurius Postumius Albinus comitiorum habendorum causa; abdicavit 325 to 324 429 to 430 Lucius Papirius Cursor Quintus Fabius Maximus Rullianus rei gerundae causa; 324 the second of the "dictator years".[iv] 322 432 Aulus Cornelius Cossus Arvina Marcus Fabius Ambustus rei gerundae (for a general purpose) or ludi faciendorum causa [v] 321 433 Quintus Fabius Ambustus Publius Aelius Paetus comitiorum habendorum causa; abdicavit 321 433 Marcus Aemilius Papus Lucius Valerius Flaccus comitiorum habendorum causa 320 434 Gaius Maenius Marcus Foslius Flaccinator causa uncertain.[vi] 320 434 Lucius Cornelius Lentulus Lucius Papirius Cursor II 320 434 Titus Manlius Imperiosus Torquatus III Lucius Papirius Crassus 316 438 Lucius Aemilius Mamercinus Privernas II Lucius Fulvius Curvus rei gerundae causa 315 439 Quintus Fabius Maximus Rullianus Quintus Aulius Cerretanus Gaius Fabius Ambustus rei gerundae causa 314 440 Gaius Maenius II Marcus Foslius Flaccinator II rei gerundae causa 313 441 Gaius Poetilius Libo Visolus or  Quintus Fabius Maximus Rullianus II Marcus Foslius Flaccinator III or  Marcus Poetilius Libo rei gerundae (et clavi figendi?) causa [vii] 312 442 Gaius Sulpicius Longus Gaius Junius Bubulcus Brutus rei gerundae causa [viii] 310 to 309 444 to 445 Lucius Papirius Cursor II Gaius Junius Bubulcus Brutus II 309 the third of the "dictator years".[iv] 306 448 Publius Cornelius Scipio Barbatus Publius Decius Mus comitiorum habendorum causa 302 452 Gaius Junius Bubulcus Brutus Marcus Titinius 302 to 301 452 to 453 Marcus Valerius Maximus Corvus II Quintus Fabius Maximus Rullianus?  or Marcus Aemilius Paullus? 301 the fourth and last of the "dictator years".[iv] 3rd century BC[edit] Year BC Year AUC Dictator Magister Equitum Notes 287 467 Quintus Hortensius mortuus est not recorded 287 467 Appius Claudius Caecus? not recorded dictator suffectus? [ix] 285 469 Marcus Aemilius Barbula? not recorded date uncertain.[x] 280 474 Gnaeus Domitius Calvinus Maximus not recorded comitiorum habendorum causa 276 478 Publius Cornelius Rufinus? not recorded date uncertain.[xi] 263 491 Gnaeus Fulvius Maximus Centumalus Quintus Marcius Philippus clavi figendi causa 257 497 Quintus Ogulnius Gallus Marcus Laetorius Plancianus Latinarum feriarum causa 249 505 Marcus Claudius Glicia abdicavit [xii] 249 505 Aulus Atilius Calatinus Lucius Caecilius Metellus 246 508 Tiberius Coruncanius Marcus Fulvius Flaccus comitiorum habendorum causa 231 523 Gaius Duilius Gaius Aurelius Cotta comitiorum habendorum causa 224 530 Lucius Caecilius Metellus Numerius Fabius Buteo comitiorum habendorum causa 221 533 Quintus Fabius Maximus Verrucosus Gaius Flaminius date uncertain.[xiii] 217 537 Quintus Fabius Maximus Verrucosus II Marcus Minucius Rufus Minucius given authority equal to the dictator's.[xiv] 217 537 Lucius Veturius Philo Marcus Pomponius Matho comitiorum habendorum causa; abdicavit 216 538 Marcus Junius Pera Tiberius Sempronius Gracchus 216 538 Marcus Fabius Buteo sine magistro equitum senatus legendi causa [xv] 213 541 Gaius Claudius Centho Quintus Fulvius Flaccus comitiorum habendorum causa 210 544 Quintus Fulvius Flaccus Publius Licinius Crassus Dives comitiorum habendorum causa 208 546 Titus Manlius Torquatus Gaius Servilius Geminus comitiorum habendorum et ludorum faciendorum causa 207 547 Marcus Livius Salinator Quintus Caecilius Metellus comitiorum habendorum causa 205 549 Quintus Caecilius Metellus Lucius Veturius Philo comitiorum habendorum causa 203 551 Publius Sulpicius Galba Maximus Marcus Servilius Pulex Geminus comitiorum habendorum causa 202 552 Gaius Servilius Geminus Publius Aelius Paetus comitiorum habendorum causa 1st century BC[edit] Year BC Year AUC Dictator Magister Equitum Notes 82 to 81 672 to 673 Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix Lucius Valerius Flaccus legibus faciendis et rei publicae constituendae causa 49 705 Gaius Julius Caesar sine magistro equitum rei gerundae causa 48 706 Gaius Julius Caesar II Marcus Antonius 47 to 44 707 to 710 Gaius Julius Caesar III Marcus Aemilius Lepidus 44 710 Gaius Julius Caesar IV occisus est Marcus Aemilius Lepidus II Gaius Octavius Gnaeus Domitius Calvinus (non iniit) dictator perpetuo rei publicae constituendae causa See also[edit] Constitution of the Roman Republic Dictator Footnotes[edit] ^ The name of the first dictator is also given as Manius Valerius, but Livy rejects this in favor of Titus Lartius Flavus on the basis of the law that only consulars could be named dictator; Valerius had not yet been named consul. Broughton follows Livy in this.[2] ^ No dictator is listed for this year in the fasti consulares, but Lydus says that there was a dictator in the forty-eighth year of the Republic. Bendel links this with the story that the senate appointed a dictator clavi figendi causa in 363 BC because that had worked to stop a pestilence a century earlier and concludes that Mamercus was this dictator. Broughton sees this as an insufficient reason to say that Mamercus was dictator in 463 BC, and suggests that Lydus has mistaken an interrex for a dictator.[3] ^ The names of the dictator and magister equitum for this year are missing from the consular fasti, and not explicitly stated by any ancient author. The Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology inserts these names, although the basis for them is not stated.[4][5] ^ a b c d The fasti consulares, but no other source, list four years in which there was a dictator but no consuls elected: 333, 324, 309, and 301. In each case, Livy includes the names of the dictator and magister equitum under the previous year's consuls.[6] ^ The sources for the causa of this dictator conflict. Most historians accept that Cornelius carried on the Ludi Romani games when the praetor fell ill, and attempt to explain how an annalist would have altered the records to make this a dictator rei gerundae causa.[7] ^ Maenius is one of three dictators appointed in 320, none of whom is listed as having abdicated and been replaced by another dictator. Hartfield asserts that Maenius was not appointed for quaestionibus exercendis, to conduct a court of inquiry into conspiracies against the Republic, as described by Livy. Instead, she concludes that he must have had a religious function, although she cannot determine precisely which causa he had, except to exclude clavi figendi. Cornelius can only have been nominated rei gerundae causa, due to the war with the Samnites, while Manlius must have been appointed to hold the elections for the next year's magistrates.[8] ^ Livy and the fasti consulares suggest that Poetelius was dictator rei gerundae causa, but Livy preserves a source who claims that one of the consuls that year instead captured the town Poetelius was said to have captured and that his dictatorship was instead clavi figendi causa. Some modern historians do not dismiss this alternate account. Because a dictator rei gerundae causa would not have hammered in the sacred nail, Hartfield adduces that he must have been appointed dictator twice this year, if he did so. Diodorus Siculus attributes the victories credited to Gaius Poetelius Libo Visolus to "Κόιντος Φάβιος" (Quintus Fabius) instead.[9] ^ The fasti consulares list Gaius Sulpicius Longus as the dictator rei gerundae causa and Gaius Junius Bubulcus Brutus as his magister equitum, but Livy names the latter as dictator, without following his usual procedure of recording the magister equitum.[10] ^ Three dictators are known only from various literary sources. Historians date them to a period for which the fasti consulares and Livy's history are missing but nothing about their causa can be known.[11] One of these was probably dictator suffectus after the death of Quintus Hortensius in 287 BC. Mommsen suggested that this was Claudius.[12] ^ One of three dictators known from literary sources, but not found in the surviving portions of the consular fasti or Livy's history. Broughton concludes that they must have held office between 292 and 285 BC, and lists them under the latest possible date. ^ The third of three dictators known from literary sources, but not found in the surviving portions of the consular fasti or Livy's history. Although Broughton concluded that they must have held office between 292 and 285 BC, the Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology places Rufinus in 276, during the war with Pyrrhus, noting, however, that Niebuhr placed his dictatorship in 280, after the Battle of Heraclea.[13] ^ Nominated by the consul Publius Claudius Pulcher after the Senate had relieved him of his command following the Battle of Drepana. Glicia was a freedman and a scribe; as such he was considered wholly unsuitable for the office and compelled to resign even before he could name his magister equitum. The precise means by which his resignation was procured is unclear. Aulus Atilius Calatinus was appointed in Claudius' stead. Notwithstanding his humble origin, Glicia was recorded as dictator in the consular fasti, and continued to wear the toga praetexta as a symbol of the honour. In 236 BC, he was a legate under the consul Gaius Licinius Varus, but after granting a treaty without permission from the Senate or the consul, was handed over to the enemy, who returned him unharmed; he was then imprisoned, banished, or put to death.[14][15][16] ^ Livy says that Fabius was appointed dictator for the second time in 217. Broughton adduces that he must have been dictator during a gap in the Capitoline fasti from 221 to 219, and before Livy's history resumes in 218. Since Flaminius was censor in 220 and 219, Broughton places this dictatorship in 221.[17] ^ Minucius, the magister equitum, vehemently opposed the dictator's delaying strategy against Hannibal, and induced a tribune of the plebs to propose a law granting him authority equal to that of the dictator. Some scholars therefore regard Minucius as a second dictator, while others describe him as a magister equitum with dictatorial imperium. Since ancient sources refer to Minucius as having been dictator, those who consider him merely magister equitum during Fabius' dictatorship suggest that Minucius later held the office during a period for which Livy's history is missing, perhaps in order to hold the comitia.[18][19] ^ This is the only instance of this causa. The Senate appointed a dictator to enroll new senators after the Battle of Cannae, instead of holding elections for new censors to carry out the same task. References[edit] ^ Hartfield, pp. (?). ^ Broughton, vol. I, p. 9. ^ Broughton, vol. I, p. 35 (note 2). ^ Broughton, vol. I, p. 130. ^ Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology, vol. I, pp. 993 ("Livius Denter, no. 1"), vol. III, p. 1354 ("Chronological Tables of Roman History"). ^ Broughton, vol. I, p. 141. ^ Hartfield, p. 420. ^ Hartfield, pp. 425–428. ^ Hartfield, pp. 443–451. ^ Hartfield, pp. 452–454. ^ Hartfield, pp. 471–476. ^ Broughton, vol. I, pp. 185–187. ^ Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology, vol. III, pp. 665 ("Cornelius Rufinus" no. 2), 1357 ("Chronological Tables of Roman History"). ^ Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology, vol. II, p. 276 (Glicia). ^ Broughton, vol. I, pp. 215, 223. ^ Hartfield, pp. 480–483. ^ Broughton, vol. I, pp. 234, 235. ^ Hartfield, pp. 489–499. ^ Broughton, vol. I, pp. 243, 244. Bibliography[edit] Marianne Elizabeth Hartfield, The Roman Dictatorship: its Character and Evolution (Ph.D. dissertation), University of California, Berkeley (1981). T. Robert S. Broughton, The Magistrates of the Roman Republic, American Philological Association (1952). Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Roman_dictators&oldid=996099472" Categories: People of the Roman Republic Government of the Roman Republic Ancient Roman titles Ancient Roman dictators Lists of office-holders in ancient Rome Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikidata Languages Беларуская Български Español Français ქართული Magyar 日本語 Русский Українська 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 24 December 2020, at 14:52 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2244 ---- Thasos - Wikipedia Thasos From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Regional unit in East Macedonia and Thrace, Greece Thasos Περιφερειακή Ενότητα / Δήμος Θάσου Regional unit Limenas (port) of Thasos, capital of the island Thasos within East Macedonia and Thrace Coordinates: 40°41′N 24°39′E / 40.683°N 24.650°E / 40.683; 24.650Coordinates: 40°41′N 24°39′E / 40.683°N 24.650°E / 40.683; 24.650 Country Greece Region East Macedonia and Thrace Capital Thasos Area  • Total 380.097 km2 (146.756 sq mi) Elevation 1,205 m (3,953 ft) Population (2011)  • Total 13,770  • Density 36/km2 (94/sq mi) Time zone UTC+2 (EET)  • Summer (DST) UTC+3 (EEST) Postal codes 640 04 Area codes 25930 Car plates ΚΒ Website www.thassos.gr Thasos (from West) Thasos or Thassos (Greek: Θάσος, Thásos) is a Greek island, geographically part of the North Aegean Sea, but administratively part of the Kavala regional unit, Macedonia. It is the northernmost major Greek island, and 12th largest by area. Thasos is also the name of the largest town of the island (officially known as Limenas Thasou, "Port of Thasos"), situated at the northern side, opposite the mainland and about 10 kilometres (6 miles) from Keramoti. Thassos island is known from ancient times for its termae making it a climatic and balneoclimateric resort area. Thasos's economy relies on timber (it is rich in forests), marble quarries, olive oil and honey. Tourism has also become important since the 1960s, although not to the level of other Greek islands. Contents 1 History 1.1 Mythology 1.2 Prehistory 1.3 Antiquity 1.4 Middle Ages 1.5 Ottoman era 1.6 Archaeological discovery 1.7 Modern era 2 Administration 3 Geography 3.1 Geology 3.2 Mining history 4 Economy 5 Localities 6 Historical population 7 Sights 8 Notable people 9 Notes 10 References 11 External links History[edit] Mythology[edit] Staphylus (Ancient Greek: Στάφυλος), the beloved of god Dionysus, lived in Thasos.[1] Prehistory[edit] Lying close to the coast of Eastern Macedonia, Thasos was inhabited from the Palaeolithic period onwards,[2] but the earliest settlement to have been explored in detail is that at Limenaria, where remains from the Middle and Late Neolithic relate closely to those found at the mainland's Drama plain. In contrast, Early Bronze Age remains on the island align it with the Aegean culture of the Cyclades and Sporades, to the south; at Skala Sotiros[3] for example, a small settlement was encircled by a strongly built defensive wall. Even earlier activity is demonstrated by the presence of large pieces of 'megalithic' anthropomorphic stelai built into these walls, which, so far, have no parallels in the Aegean area. There is then a gap in the archaeological record until the end of the Bronze Age c 1100 BC, when the first burials took place at the large cemetery of Kastri in the interior of the island.[4][5] Here built tombs covered with small mound of earth were typical until the end of the Iron Age. In the earliest tombs were a small number of locally imitated Mycenaean pottery vessels, but the majority of the hand-made pottery with incised decoration reflects connections eastwards with Thrace and beyond. Antiquity[edit] Ancient Agora of Thasos The island was colonised at an early date by Phoenicians, attracted probably by its gold mines; they founded a temple to the god Melqart, whom the Greeks identified as "Tyrian Heracles", and whose cult was merged with Heracles in the course of the island's Hellenization.[6] The temple still existed in the time of Herodotus.[7] An eponymous Thasos or Thasus, son of Phoenix (or of Agenor, as Pausanias reported) was said to have been the leader of the Phoenicians, and to have given his name to the island.[8] Around 650 BC, or a little earlier, Greeks from Paros founded a colony on Thasos.[9] A generation or so later, the poet Archilochus, a descendant of these colonists, wrote of casting away his shield during a minor war against an indigenous Thracian tribe, the Saians.[10] Thasian power, and sources of its wealth, extended to the mainland, where the Thasians owned gold mines even more valuable than those of the island; their combined annual revenues amounted to between 200 and 300 talents. Herodotus says that the best mines on the island were those opened by the Phoenicians on the east side of the island, facing Samothrace. Archilochus described Thasos as "an ass's backbone crowned with wild wood." The island's capital, Thasos, had two harbours. Besides its gold mines, the wine, nuts and marble of Thasos were well known in antiquity.[8] Thasian wine was quite famous. Thasian coins had the head of the wine god Dionysos on one side and bunches of grape of the other.[11] Thasos was important during the Ionian Revolt against Persia. After the capture of Miletus (494 BC) Histiaeus, the Ionian leader, laid siege. The attack failed, but, warned by the danger, the Thasians employed their revenues to build war ships and strengthen their fortifications. This excited the suspicions of the Persians, and Darius compelled them to surrender their ships and pull down their walls.[12] After the defeat of Xerxes the Thasians joined the Delian League; but afterwards, on account of a difference about the mines and marts on the mainland, they revolted.[8] silver tritartemorion struck in Thasos circa 411-404 BC. Satyr on the obverse and dolphins on the reverse The Athenians defeated them by sea, and, after a siege that lasted more than two years, took the capital, Thasos, probably in 463 BC, and compelled the Thasians to destroy their walls, surrender their ships, pay an indemnity and an annual contribution (in 449 BC this was 21 talents, from 445 BC about 30 talents), and resign their possessions on the mainland. In 411 BC, at the time of the oligarchical revolution at Athens, Thasos again revolted from Athens and received a Lacedaemonian governor; but in 407 BC the partisans of Lacedaemon were expelled, and the Athenians under Thrasybulus were admitted.[8] After the Battle of Aegospotami (405 BC), Thasos again fell into the hands of the Lacedaemonians under Lysander who formed a decarchy there; but the Athenians must have recovered it, for it formed one of the subjects of dispute between them and Philip II of Macedonia. In the embroilment between Philip V of Macedonia and the Romans, Thasos submitted to Philip, but received its freedom at the hands of the Romans after the Battle of Cynoscephalae (197 BC), and it was still a "free" state in the time of Pliny.[8] Middle Ages[edit] Further information: Byzantine Greece and Frankokratia Byzantine church in Thasos Thasos was part of the Eastern Roman Empire, now known as the Byzantine Empire, from 395 on. According to the 6th century Synecdemus, it belonged to the province of Macedonia Prima, although the 10th century De thematibus claims that it was part of Thracia.[13] The island was a major source of marble until the disruption of the Slavic invasions in the late 6th/7th centuries, and several churches from Late Antiquity have been found on it.[13] The island remained in Byzantine hands for most of the Middle Ages. It functioned as a naval base in the 13th century, under its own doux, and came briefly under the rule of the Genoese Tedisio Zaccaria in 1307–13. Returning to Byzantine control, its bishopric was raised to an archdiocese by Manuel II Palaiologos. Thasos was captured by the Genoese Gattilusi family c. 1434, who surrendered it to the Ottoman Empire in 1455.[13] Following the Ottoman conquest of the Despotate of the Morea in 1460, the former Despot Demetrios Palaiologos received lands on the island.[13] It is related that the Byzantine Greek Saint Joannicius the Great (752–846) in one of his miracles freed the island of Thasos from a multitude of snakes. Ottoman era[edit] Further information: Ottoman Greece Thasos was incorporated into the Ottoman Empire in 1456.[14] Under the Ottoman rule, the island was known as Ottoman Turkish: طاشوز Taşöz. Between 1770 and 1774, the island was briefly occupied by a Russian fleet. By this time the population of Thassos had gravitated to the inland villages as a protective measure.[15] Nearly 50 years later, a revolt against Ottoman rule arose in 1821, at the outbreak of the Greek War of Independence, led by Hatzigiorgis Metaxas, but it failed. The island had been given in 1813 by the Sultan Mahmud II to Muhammad Ali of Egypt as a personal fiefdom, as a reward for his intervention against the Wahhabites. Egyptian rule was relatively benign (by some accounts Muhammad Ali had either been born or spent his infancy on Thasos) and the island became prosperous, until 1908, when the New Turk regime asserted Turkish control. The island was a kaza (sub-province), lastly of the Sanjak of Drama in the Salonica Vilayet, until the Balkan Wars. On 20 October 1912 during the First Balkan War, a Greek naval detachment freed Thasos from the Ottomans and it became part of Greece. From the day it was reunited with Greece, it has remained so ever since. Archaeological discovery[edit] On the 23 November 1902 issue of the New York Times (p. 5), it was reported that on the island of Thassos, archaeologist Theodore Bent discovered the tomb of Cassius, the one who slew himself after the disastrous defeat at the Battle of Philippi in 42 B.C. Cassius was buried by Brutus at Thassos, where the army of the patriots of the Republic had established its base of supplies.[16][17] Researchers from the Adelphi University discovered in the Paliokastro on Thasos ten skeletal remains, four women and six men, who were buried between the fourth and seventh centuries A.D. Their bones illuminated their physical activities, traumas, and even a complex form of brain surgery. According to the researchers: "The very serious trauma cases sustained by both males and females had been treated surgically or orthopedically by a very experienced physician/surgeon with great training in trauma care. We believe it to have been a military physician". The researchers were impressed by the complexity of the brain surgical operation.[18] Modern era[edit] Further information: Axis occupation of Greece during World War II Limenaria in 1950s The writer Vassilis Vassilikos, famous for his novel "Z", which was later adapted into an Academy Award-winning film was born in Thasos in 1934. He later became Director General of Greek Public Television, and Greece's ambassador to UNESCO. During the Axis occupation (April 1941 – October 1944) Thasos, along with the region of East Macedonia and Thrace, was assigned by the Nazis to their Bulgarian allies. The Bulgarian government renamed the island "Tasos" and closed its schools. Thasos' mountainous terrain facilitated resistance activity against the occupation forces, mainly led by the left-wing National Liberation Front (EAM). After the end of the war and the withdrawal of Axis troops in 1944, the island was caught up in the Greek Civil War. The leader of the communist naval forces in the civil war, Sarantis Spintzos, was a native of Thasos.[19] Skirmishes and communist guerilla attacks continued on Thasos until 1950, almost a year after the main hostilities were over on the mainland. In the post-war decades, another native of Thasos, Costas Tsimas, was to attain national recognition; a friend of Prime Minister Andreas Papandreou, he was appointed Director of the National Intelligence Service, the first civilian to hold that post. Thasos, the capital, is now informally known as Limenas, or "the port". It is served by a ferry route to and from Keramoti a port close to Kavala International Airport, and has the shortest possible crossing to the island. Scala Prinos 20 km south of Thassos town is served by a ferry route to and from Kavala. Administration[edit] Thasos is a separate regional unit of the East Macedonia and Thrace region, and the only municipality of the regional unit.[20] As a part of the 2011 Kallikratis government reform, the regional unit Thasos was created out of part of the former Kavala Prefecture. The municipality, unchanged at the Kallikratis reform, includes a few uninhabited islets besides the main island Thasos and has an area of 380.097 km2.[21] The province of Thasos (Greek: Επαρχία Θάσου) was one of the provinces of the Kavala Prefecture. It had the same territory as the present municipality.[22] It was abolished in 2006. Geography[edit] Thasos from space, April 1993 Thasos island is located in the northern Aegean sea approximately 7 km (4 mi) from the northern mainland and 20 kilometres (12 miles) south-east of Kavala, and is of generally rounded shape, without deep bays or significant peninsulas. The terrain is mountainous but not particularly rugged, rising gradually from coast to centre. The highest peak is Ypsario (Ipsario), at 1,205 metres (3,953 feet), somewhat east of centre. Pine forest covers much of the island's eastern slopes. Historically, the island's population was chiefly engaged in agriculture and stockbreeding, and established villages inland, some of them connected via stairways (known as skalas) to harbors at the shore. The local population gradually migrated towards these shoreline settlements as tourism began to develop as an important source of income. Thus, there are several "paired villages" such as Maries–Skala Maries, with the former inland and the latter on the coast. Geology[edit] This section may be too technical for most readers to understand. Please help improve it to make it understandable to non-experts, without removing the technical details. (January 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) Geological and Metallogenic map of Thasos island. The island is formed mainly by gneisses, schists and marbles of the Rhodope Massif. Marble sequences corresponding to the Falacron Marbles intercalated by schists and gneisses, are up to 500m thick and are separated from the underlying gneisses by a transition zone about 300 m thick termed the T-zone consisting of alternances of dolomitic and calcitic marbles intercalated by schists and gneisses. The rocks have undergone several periods of regional metamorphism, to at least upper amphibolite facies, and there was a subsequent phase of retrograde metamorphism. At least three periods of regional deformation have been identified, the most important being large scale isoclinal folding with axes aligned north-west. The T-zone is deformed and is interpreted by some authors as a regional thrust of pre-major folding age. There are two major high angle fault systems aligned north-west and north-east respectively. A large low-angle thrust cuts the gneiss, schist and marble sequence at the south-west corner of the island, probably indicating an overthrusting of the Serbomacedonian Massif onto the Rodope Massif. The Late Miocene oil-producing Nestos-Prinos basin is located between Thassos island and the mainland. The floor of the basin is around 1,500 m deep off the Thassos coast (South Kavala ridge; Proedrou, 1988) and up to 4.000–5.000 m in the axial sector between Thassos and the mainland. The basin is filled with Late Miocene-Pliocene sediments, including ubiquitously repeated evaporite layers of rock salt and anhydrite-dolomite that alternate with sandstones, conglomerates, black shales, and uraniferous coal measures (Proedrou, 1979, 1988; Taupitz, 1985). Stratigraphically equivalent rocks on the mainland are clastic sediments with coal beds, marine to brackish fluvial units and travertines. Mining history[edit] The earliest mining on the island has been dated to around 13,000 BC, when paleolithic miners dug a shaft at the site of the modern-era Tzines iron mine for the extraction of limonitic ochre.[23] Mining for base and precious metals started around the 7th century BC with the Phoenicians, followed in the 4th century by the Greeks, then the Romans. These later mines were both open-cast and underground, mostly to exploit the island's numerous karst hosted calamine deposits for their lead and silver. Gold, copper and iron were also found; the Byzantines quarried marble on the island. In the early 20th century, mining companies (most notably the Speidel mining company) exploited the island's zinc-lead rich calamine ores, with a yield of around 2 million tonnes, and a processing plant at Limenaria produced zinc oxide. Iron ore was mined on a significant scale from 1954 to 1964, with a yield of around 3 million tonnes. Since 1964, surveys have established the existence of a deep-level zinc-lead deposit, but the only mining activity on the island has been marble quarrying. Lead-zinc mine at Sellada Iron mine of Koupanada Gold mine Iron mine at Tzines, with paleolithic mine-tunnel Marble quarry of Alyki Economy[edit] Shiploading in Limenaria during the 1950s By far the most important economic activity is tourism. The main agricultural products on the island are honey, almonds, walnuts, olives (famously Throuba olives), and olive oil, as well as wine, sheep, goat herding, and fishing.[24] Other industries are lumber and mining which includes lead, zinc, and marble, especially in the Panagia area where one of the mountains near the Thracian Sea has a large marble quarry. The marble quarries in the south (in the area of Aliki), now abandoned, were mined during ancient times. Localities[edit] Panagia village Towns and villages with over 100 inhabitants (2011 census) are: Kallirachi (452) Koinyra (105) Limenaria (2,471) Maries (158) Ormos Prinou (156) Panagia (725) Potamia (1,383) Potos (815) Prinos (1,211) Rachoni (446) Skala Kallirachis (566) Skala Marion (379) Skala Rachoniou (283) Skala Sotiros (376) Thasos (Limenas Thasou) (3,234) Theologos (636) Traditional village of Theologos Historical population[edit] Year Town Municipality 1981 2,312 – 1991 2,600 – 2001 3,140 13,765 2011 3,240 13,770 Sights[edit] Kouros at the Archaeological Museum of Thasos Polygnotos Vagis Municipal Museum in Potamia Paradisos beach Archaeological Museum of Thasos and the nearby ancient agora in Thasos town Acropolis of Thasos and ancient theater near Thasos town Polygnotos Vagis Municipal Museum in Potamia Folklore Museum of Limenaria Archangel Michael's Monastery Saint Panteleimon Monastery: it was built in 1843 and became monastery in 1987. According to inhabitants of Thassos, someone wanted to build it in favor of Saint Panteleimon. The workers started the building at a location, but the next day when they wanted to continue with the construction, the part they had built was found destroyed and their tools were missing. The same happened on the following days. One day they saw footprints on the ground and followed them until they found their tools nearby a natural spring. Finally, they built the monastery at that spot. Monastery of the Assumption Kastro: its foundation year is unknown. This village must have been created during the years of Frankish domination. Krambousa Isle: it can be found across the coast of Skala Potamia. The thick vegetation make it impossible to explore all parts of it. It is full with special wild vegetable called "Krambi". The little church of Saint Daniel is located at the top of the hill. The inhabitants visit this church on the day of the saint every year. Mount Ypsario (Ipsario) 1,203 meters (3,947 ft) Artificial Lake in Maries Notable people[edit] Archilochos (7th century BC), warrior and poet. Aglaophon (6th–5th century BC), painter, teacher and father of Polygnotus and Aristophon[25] Hegemon of Thasos, comedian, inventor of parody Leodamas (4th century BC), mathematician Neseus of Thasos, painter Polygnotos Vagis (1892–1965), Thasos-born US sculptor Polygnotus (mid-5th century BC), painter Stesimbrotos (c. 470 BC – c. 420 BC), sophist Theagenes of Thasos (480 BC) Olympic boxer Pankratiast (476 BC), Olympic runner Androsthenes of Thasos (4th century BC), Admiral serving under Alexander the Great. Vassilis Vassilikos (1934), poet and author. Notes[edit] ^ Suda, § th.59 ^ Papadopoulos S., "Recent Field Investigations in Paleolithic, Neolithic and Bronze Age Thasos", International Symposium in Memoriam Mieczislaw Domaradzki, Kazanlak, Archaeological Institute of Sofia, Kazanluk, (in press) ^ Κουκούλη Χ.- Χρυσανθάκη, "Ανασκαφή Σκάλας Σωτήρος Θάσου", Το Αρχαιολογικό Έργο στη Μακεδονία και Θράκη, 1, ((1987), 1988, 391–406, 2 (1988), 1991, 421–431, 3 (1989), 1992, 507–520, 4 (1990), 1993, 531–545). ^ Chaidou Koukouli-Chrysanthaki: Πρωτοιστορική Θάσος. Τα νεκροταφεία του οικισμού Κάστρι, Μερος Α και Β, Υπουργείο Πολιτισμού, Δυμοσιέυματα του αρχαιολογικού Δελτίου Αρ. 45, ISBN 960-214-107-7 ^ Agelarakis A., "Reflections of the Human Condition in Prehistoric Thasos: Aspects of the Anthropological and Palaeopathological Record from the Settlement of Kastri". Actes du Colloque International Matières prèmieres et Technologie de la Préhistoire à nos jours, Limenaria, Thasos. The French Archaeological Institute in Greece, 1999. 447–468. ^ Pausanias, 5.25.12. "The Thasians, who are Phoenicians by descent, and sailed from Tyre, and from Phoenicia generally, together with Thasos, the son of Agenor, in search of Europa, dedicated at Olympia a Herakles, the pedestal as well as the image being of bronze. The height of the image is ten cubits, and he holds a club in his right hand and a bow in his left. They told me in Thasos that they used to worship the same Heracles as the Tyrians, but that afterwards, when they were included among the Greeks, they adopted the worship of Heracles the son of Amphitryon." ^ Herodotus. Histories, 2.44. "In the wish to get the best information that I could on these matters, I made a voyage to Tyre in Phoenicia, hearing there was a temple of Heracles at that place, very highly venerated. I visited the temple, and found it richly adorned with a number of offerings, among which were two pillars, one of pure gold, the other of smaragdos, shining with great brilliancy at night. In a conversation I held with the priests, I inquired how long their temple had been built, and found by their answer that they, too, differed from the Hellenes. They said that the temple was built at the same time that the city was founded, and that the foundation of the city took place 2,300 years ago. In Tyre I remarked another temple where the same god was worshipped as the Thasian Heracles. So I went on to Thasos, where I found a temple of Heracles, which had been built by the Phoenicians who colonised that island when they sailed in search of Europa. Even this was five generations earlier than the time when Heracles, son of Amphitryon, was born in Hellas. These researches show plainly that there is an ancient god Heracles; and my own opinion is that those Hellenes act most wisely who build and maintain two temples of Heracles, in the one of which the Heracles worshipped is known by the name of Olympian, and has sacrifice offered to him as an immortal, while in the other the honours paid are such as are due to a hero." ^ a b c d e Chisholm 1911, p. 727. ^ AJ Graham,"The Foundation of Thasos", The Annual of the British School at Athens, Vol. 73 (1978), pp. 61-98. ^ Zafeiropoulou F., A., Agelarakis, "Warriors of Paros". Archaeology 58.1(2005): 30–35. ^ Hugh Johnson, Vintage: The Story of Wine pg 39. Simon and Schuster 1989 ^ Agelarakis A., – Y., Serpanos "Auditory Exostoses, Infracranial Skeleto-Muscular Changes and Maritime Activities in Classical Period Thasos Island", Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2010, 45–57. ^ a b c d Gregory, Timothy E.; Cutler, Anthony (1991). "Thasos". In Kazhdan, Alexander (ed.). Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium. London and New York: Oxford University Press. p. 2031. ISBN 978-0-19-504652-6. ^ Somel, Selçuk Akşin, The A to Z of the Ottoman Empire, p. 103, Scarecrow Press, Mar 23, 2010 ^ "Greek Islands:Thassos". Retrieved 4 December 2015. ^ http://article.archive.nytimes.com/1902/11/23/118486761.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAJBTN455PTTBQQNRQ&Expires=1444129535&Signature=KwJSjEtOxWUN5qiW9LmU9weHdNk%3D[dead link] ^ "Life and Land » Blog Archive » The Battle of Philippi: The Battle that Changed the Course of Western Civilization". Retrieved 4 December 2015. ^ Adelphi researcher discovers early, complex brain surgery in ancient Greece ^ Κώστας Τσίμας, Σελίδες Ζωής: Αγώνες για την Ελευθερία και τη Δημοκρατία, 2004, σελίδες 36-40 ^ "Kallikratis reform law text" (PDF). ^ "Population & housing census 2001 (incl. area and average elevation)" (PDF) (in Greek). National Statistical Service of Greece. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-09-21. ^ "Detailed census results 1991" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-03-03.  (39 MB) (in Greek and French) ^ Kovkouli et al. 1988. ^ "Why is Thassos important". thassos-dream.gr. Economy. Archived from the original on 2015-12-08. Retrieved 2015-12-04. ^ "Aglaophon". Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology. Ancientlibrary.com. p. 74 (v. 1). Archived from the original on 2012-10-07. Retrieved 2012-10-26. References[edit] Agelarakis A., "Linen Thread Fragment". Ed. Chi. Koukouli-Chrysanthaki. "Proto-Historic Thasos", Archaeologiko Deltio 2.45 (1992–1993): 803 Agelarakis A., "Investigations of Archaeo-Anthropological Nature at the Classical Necropolis of the Island of Thasos between 1979–1996", Archaiologiko Ergo sti Makedonia kai Thraki, 10B (1997): 770–794. Agelarakis A., "On the Anthropological and Palaeopathological Records of a Select Number of Human Individuals from the Ancient Necropolis of Thasos Island". In by Sgourou M., BSA 96 (2001): 355–364. Agelarakis A., "Investigations of Physical Anthropology & Palaeopathology at the Ancient Necropolis of Thasos", In M. Sgourou, Excavating houses and graves: exploring aspects of everyday life and afterlife in ancient Thasos, BAR International series 1031 (2002): 12–19. Antje and Günther Schwab: Thassos – Samothraki, 1999, ISBN 3-932410-30-0. N. Epitropou et al.: "The discovery of primary stratabound Pb – Zn mineralization at Thassos Island", L' Industria Mineraria n. 4, 1982. N. Epitropou, D. Konstantinides, D. Bitzios: "The Mariou Pb – Zn Mineralization of the Thassos Island Greece.", Mineral deposits of the Alps and of Alpine Epoch in Europe ed. by H. J. Echneibert, Spring – Verlag Berlin Heilderberg, 1983. N. Epitropou et al.: "Le mineralizzazioni carsiche a Pb – Zn dell' isola di Thassos, Grecia.", Mem. Soc. Geol. H. 22, 1981, pp. 139–143. Omenetto P., Epitropou N., Konstantinides D.: "The base metal sulphides of W. Thassos Island in the Geological Metallogenic Frame work of Rhodope and Surrounding Regions.", International Earth Sciences Congress on AEGEAN Regions, 1–6 October 1990, İzmir -Turkey. Epitropou N., Omenetto P., Constantinides D., "Μineralizations a Pb – Zn comparables au type ' Mississippi Valley'. L'example de l'ile de Thassos ( Macedoine, Grece du Nord)", MVT WORKSHOP, Paris, France, 1993.  This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Thasos". Encyclopædia Britannica. 26 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 727–728. External links[edit] Media related to Thasos at Wikimedia Commons Thasos travel guide from Wikivoyage Virtual tour of Thasos v t e Administrative division of the Eastern Macedonia and Thrace Region Area 14,157 km2 (5,466 sq mi) Population 608,182 (as of 2011) Municipalities 22 (since 2011) Capital Komotini Regional unit of Drama Doxato Drama Kato Nevrokopi Paranesti Prosotsani Regional unit of Evros Alexandroupoli Didymoteicho Orestiada Samothrace Soufli Regional unit of Kavala Kavala Nestos Pangaio Regional unit of Rhodope Arriana Iasmos Komotini Maroneia-Sapes Regional unit of Thasos Thasos Regional unit of Xanthi Abdera Myki Topeiros Xanthi Regional governor Christos Metios (since November 2016) Decentralized Administration Macedonia and Thrace v t e Subdivisions of the municipality of Thasos Municipal unit of Thasos Kallirachi Limenaria Maries Panagia Potamia Prinos Rachoni Sotiras Thasos (town) Theologos v t e Aegean Sea General Countries  Greece  Turkey Other Aegean civilizations Aegean dispute Aegean Islands Aegean Islands Cyclades Ananes Amorgos Anafi Andros Antimilos Antiparos Delos Despotiko Donousa Folegandros Gyaros Ios Irakleia Kardiotissa Kea Keros Kimolos Koufonisia Kythnos Milos Mykonos Naxos Paros Polyaigos Rineia Santorini Schoinoussa Serifopoula Serifos Sifnos Sikinos Syros Therasia Tinos Vous Dodecanese Agathonisi Arkoi Armathia Alimia Astakida Astypalaia Çatalada Chamili Farmakonisi Gaidaros Gyali Halki Imia/Kardak Kalolimnos Kalymnos Kandelioussa Kara Ada Karpathos Kasos Kinaros Kos Küçük Tavşan Adası Leipsoi (Lipsi) Leros Levitha (Lebynthos) Nimos Nisyros Pacheia Patmos Platy Pserimos Rhodes Salih Ada Saria Symi Syrna Telendos Tilos Zaforas North Aegean Agios Efstratios Agios Minas Ammouliani Ayvalık Islands Büyük Ada Chios Chryse Cunda Foça Islands Fournoi Korseon Icaria Imbros Koukonesi Lemnos Lesbos Megalonisi (Nisiopi) Metalik Ada Oinousses Pasas Psara Samiopoula Samos Samothrace Tenedos Thasos Thymaina Uzunada Zourafa Saronic Aegina Agios Georgios Agistri Dokos Hydra Poros Psyttaleia Salamis Spetses Sporades Adelfoi Islets Agios Georgios Skopelou Alonnisos Argos Skiathou Dasia Erinia Gioura Grammeza Kyra Panagia Lekhoussa Peristera Piperi Psathoura Repi Sarakino Skandili Skantzoura Skiathos Skopelos Skyropoula Skyros Tsoungria Valaxa Cretan Afentis Christos Agia Varvara Agioi Apostoloi Agioi Pantes Agioi Theodoroi Agios Nikolaos Anavatis Arnaouti Aspros Volakas Avgo Crete Daskaleia Dia Diapori Dionysades Elasa Ftena Trachylia Glaronisi Gramvousa Grandes Kalydon (Spinalonga) Karavi Karga Katergo Kavallos Kefali Kolokythas Koursaroi Kyriamadi Lazaretta Leon Mavros Mavros Volakas Megatzedes Mochlos Nikolos Palaiosouda Peristeri Peristerovrachoi Petalida Petalouda Pontikaki Pontikonisi Praso (Prasonisi) Prosfora Pseira Sideros Souda Valenti Vryonisi Other Antikythera Euboea Kythira Makronisos v t e Former provinces of Greece Grouped by region and prefecture Attica East and West Attica Attica Piraeus Aegina Hydra Kythira Piraeus Troizinia West Attica Megaris Central Greece Boeotia Livadeia Thebes Euboea Chalcis Istiaia Karystia Phocis Dorida Parnassida Phthiotis Domokos Locris Phthiotis Central Macedonia Chalkidiki Arnaia Chalkidiki Imathia Imathia Naousa Kilkis Kilkis Paionia Pella Almopia Edessa Giannitsa Serres Fyllida Serres Sintiki Visaltia Thessaloniki Lagkadas Thessaloniki Crete Chania Apokoronas Kissamos Kydonia Selino Sfakia Heraklion Kainourgio Malevizi Monofatsi Pediada Pyrgiotissa Temenos Viannos Lasithi Ierapetra Lasithi Mirampello Siteia Rethymno Agios Vasileios Amari Mylopotamos Rethymno Eastern Macedonia and Thrace Evros Alexandroupoli Didymoteicho Orestiada Samothrace Soufli Kavala Kavala Nestos Pangaio Thasos Rhodope Komotini Sapes Epirus Ioannina Dodoni Konitsa Metsovo Pogoni Thesprotia Filiates Margariti Souli Thyamida Ionian Islands Corfu Corfu Paxoi Kefallinia Ithaca Kranaia Pali Sami North Aegean Lesbos Lemnos Mithymna Mytilene Plomari Samos Ikaria Samos Peloponnese Arcadia Gortynia Kynouria Mantineia Megalopoli Argolis Argos Ermionida Nafplia Laconia Epidavros Limira Gytheio Lacedaemon Oitylo Messenia Kalamai Messini Pylia Trifylia South Aegean Cyclades Andros Kea Milos Naxos Paros Syros Thira Tinos Dodecanese Kalymnos Karpathos Kos Rhodes Thessaly Larissa Agia Elassona Farsala Larissa Tyrnavos Magnesia Almyros Skopelos Volos Trikala Kalampaka Trikala West Greece Achaea Aigialeia Kalavryta Patras Aetolia-Acarnania Missolonghi Nafpaktia Trichonida Valtos Vonitsa-Xiromero Elis Elis Olympia Western Macedonia Kozani Eordaia Kozani Voio Note: not all prefectures were subdivided into provinces. Authority control GND: 4119578-4 NKC: ge310935 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thasos&oldid=995100446" Categories: Thasos Gold mines in Greece Zinc mines in Greece Surface mines in Greece Underground mines in Greece Quarries in Greece Municipalities of Eastern Macedonia and Thrace Provinces of Greece Islands of Greece Islands of Eastern Macedonia and Thrace Landforms of Thasos Regional units of Eastern Macedonia and Thrace North Aegean islands Macedonia (Greece) Members of the Delian League Thracian Sea Greek city-states Parian colonies Territories of the Republic of Genoa Populated places in Thasos Hidden categories: All articles with dead external links Articles with dead external links from July 2017 CS1 Greek-language sources (el) Articles with Greek-language sources (el) Articles with French-language sources (fr) Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata Coordinates on Wikidata Articles containing Greek-language text Articles containing Ancient Greek (to 1453)-language text Wikipedia articles that are too technical from January 2013 All articles that are too technical Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica with Wikisource reference Wikipedia articles incorporating text from the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica Commons category link is on Wikidata Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikivoyage Languages العربية Беларуская Български Brezhoneg Català Cebuano Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Euskara فارسی Français Galego 한국어 Հայերեն Bahasa Indonesia Italiano Latina Lietuvių Magyar Македонски മലയാളം مصرى Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Norsk nynorsk Polski Português Română Русский Scots Shqip Slovenčina Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Türkçe Українська اردو Tiếng Việt 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 19 December 2020, at 06:19 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2279 ---- Category:Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers - Wikipedia Help Category:Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search This category is for articles with BIBSYS identifiers. Please do not add subcategories. For more information, see Wikipedia:Authority control. Administrators: Please do not delete this category even if it is empty! This category may be empty occasionally or even most of the time. This is a maintenance category, used for maintenance of the Wikipedia project. It is not part of the encyclopedia and contains non-article pages, or groups articles by status rather than subject. Do not include this category in content categories. This is a tracking category. It builds and maintains a list of pages primarily for the sake of the list itself. They are not part of the encyclopedia's categorization scheme. This category is hidden on its member pages—unless the corresponding user preference (appearance → show hidden categories) is set. These categories are used to track, build and organize lists of pages needing "attention en masse" (for example, pages using deprecated syntax), or that may need to be edited at someone's earliest convenience. These categories also serve to aggregate members of several lists or sub-categories into a larger, more efficient list (discriminated by classifications). Contents: Top 0–9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z * # 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 • A Aa Ae Aj Ao At • B Ba Be Bj Bo Bt • C Ca Ce Cj Co Ct • D Da De Dj Do Dt • E Ea Ee Ej Eo Et • F Fa Fe Fj Fo Ft • G Ga Ge Gj Go Gt • H Ha He Hj Ho Ht • I Ia Ie Ij Io It • J Ja Je Jj Jo Jt • K Ka Ke Kj Ko Kt • L La Le Lj Lo Lt • M Ma Me Mj Mo Mt • N Na Ne Nj No Nt • O Oa Oe Oj Oo Ot • P Pa Pe Pj Po Pt • Q Qa Qe Qj Qo Qt • R Ra Re Rj Ro Rt • S Sa Se Sj So St • T Ta Te Tj To Tt • U Ua Ue Uj Uo Ut • V Va Ve Vj Vo Vt • W Wa We Wj Wo Wt • X Xa Xe Xj Xo Xt • Y Ya Ye Yj Yo Yt • Z Za Ze Zj Zo Zt Pages in this category should only be added by Module:Authority control. Pages in category "Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers" The following 200 pages are in this category, out of approximately 67,806 total. This list may not reflect recent changes (learn more). (previous page) (next page), Yamaguchi Seishi 0–9 2raumwohnung 3 (American band) 3 Doors Down 3-11 Porter The Third and the Mortal 4hero 5 Seconds of Summer 8½ 12 Angry Men (1957 film) The 12 Cellists of the Berlin Philharmonic 12 Monkeys The 13th Floor Elevators 21st Century Museum of Contemporary Art, Kanazawa 50 Cent 54 Nude Honeys The 101ers 120 Days 702 (group) 1349 (band) 1910 Fruitgum Company 2001: A Space Odyssey (film) A A-Teens Brynjar Aa Hubertus Antonius van der Aa Michel van der Aa Pieter van der Aa Andreas Leigh Aabel Hauk Aabel Per Aabel Karen Aabye Hans Günther Aach Thorvald Aadahl Eivind Aadland Bertus Aafjes Torstein Aagaard-Nilsen Johannes Aagaard Rolf M. Aagaard Andreas Aagesen Fritz Aagesen Frøy Aagre Ernst van Aaken Kim Fupz Aakeson Jeppe Aakjær Jacob Aaland Per Knut Aaland Knut Aalefjær Odd Aalen Aaliyah Anathon Aall Hans Aall Jacob Aall Jørgen Aall Wil van der Aalst Aino Aalto Alvar Aalto Juhani Aaltonen Remu Aaltonen Bjørn Skogstad Aamo Bjørn Aamodt Kjetil André Aamodt Rolf Aamot Johannes Aanderaa Simen Aanerud Hans Aanrud Olav Aaraas Ingvil Aarbakke Jarle Aarbakke Magnus Aarbakke Frank Aarebrot Wilhelm Aarek Emil Aarestrup Andreas Aarflot Berte Canutte Aarflot Mauritz Aarflot Antti Aarne Asbjørn Aarnes Hans Aarnes Selma Lønning Aarø Aaron ben Moses ben Asher Benjamin Aaron Caroline Aaron David L. Aaron Henry J. Aaron Jane Aaron (educator) Jason Aaron Ben Aaronovitch Al Aarons Edward S. Aarons Jules Aarons AARP Sven Aarrestad Harald Aars Jens Aars Kristian Birch-Reichenwald Aars Sophus Aars Eivind Aarset Asbjørn Aarseth Espen Aarseth Dagfinn Aarskog Stian Aarstad Tapani Aartomaa Kjell Aartun Alexander Aas Alf-Jørgen Aas Bjarne Aas Nils Aas Ulf Aas Unn Irene Aasdalen Arne Paasche Aasen Ivar Aasen John Aasen Anne Aaserud Jan Aaseth Gunnar Aasland Karin Aasma Håkon Aasnes Rigmor Aasrud Arnstein Aassve Asbjørn Aavik Johannes Aavik Mercedes Abad Martín Abadi Moussa Abadi Guillermo Abadía Morales Alberto Abadie Gjorgji Abadžiev Nick Abadzis Abaji (Lebanese musician) Magdalena Abakanowicz Leonid Abalkin Iñaki Ábalos Vladimir Abashev Carmine Abate ABBA Fray Íñigo Abbad y Lasierra Claudio Abbado Nicola Abbagnano Eleonora Abbagnato Abbas the Great Abbas Ibn al-Ahnaf Ferhat Abbas Ali Abbasi (director) Reza Abbasi Florencia Abbate Janet Abbate Cleveland Abbe Ernst Abbe Ahmed Abbes John Roland Abbey Ruth Abbey Abbo Cernuus Abbo of Fleury Charles Greeley Abbot Andrew Abbott Berenice Abbott Edwin Abbott Abbott Frederick M. Abbott Hailey Abbott Isabella Abbott Jack Abbott (author) Jacob Abbott Jeff Abbott John Stevens Cabot Abbott Lee K. Abbott Leonard Abbott Rachel Abbott Sidney Abbott Maria Abbracchio Abd al-Rahman III Anouar Abdel-Malek Muddathir Abdel-Rahim Hamed Abdel-Samad Rawi Abdelal Emir Abdelkader Abdelwahab Bouhdiba Emil Abderhalden Geneive Abdo Kader Abdolah Salim Abdool Karim Ildar Abdrazakov Abdul Hamid II Ahmad Sarji Abdul Hamid ʻAbdu'l-Bahá Paula Abdul Ramazan Abdulatipov Abdullah I of Jordan Abdullah Md Zin Mohamed Diriye Abdullahi Chingiz Abdullayev Kōbō Abe Kazushige Abe Keiko Abe Masao Abe Ryuichi Abe Shinzo Abe Tomoji Abe Yoshitoshi ABe Yael Abecassis Julius Friedrich Heinrich Abegg (previous page) (next page) Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Wikipedia_articles_with_BIBSYS_identifiers&oldid=901882825" Categories: Pages with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with authority control information Hidden categories: Hidden categories Tracking categories Template Large category TOC via CatAutoTOC on category with over 20,000 pages CatAutoTOC generates Large category TOC Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Category Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Afrikaans Asturianu تۆرکجه বাংলা Bân-lâm-gú भोजपुरी Български Dansk Ελληνικά Español Euskara فارسی 客家語/Hak-kâ-ngî 한국어 हिन्दी Ilokano Bahasa Indonesia Македонски मराठी Bahasa Melayu Mìng-dĕ̤ng-ngṳ̄ 日本語 Nordfriisk ଓଡ଼ିଆ Português Română Sardu Scots සිංහල Simple English Slovenščina Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Tagalog ไทย Türkçe اردو 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 14 June 2019, at 23:00 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2292 ---- Roman currency - Wikipedia Roman currency From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Denarius of Marcus Aurelius. Legend: IMP. M. ANTONINVS AVG. TR. P. XXV. Numismatics Currency Coins Banknotes Forgery List ISO Circulating currencies Africa The Americas Europe Asia Oceania Local currencies Company scrip LETS Time dollars Fictional currencies Proposed currencies History Historical currencies Greek Roman China India Persian Tibetan Thai Filipino Malay Byzantine Medieval currencies Production Mint Designers Coining Milling Hammering Cast Exonumia Credit cards Medals Tokens Cheques Notaphily Banknotes Scripophily Stocks Bonds Glossary of numismatics  Numismatics portal  Money portal v t e Roman currency for most of Roman history consisted of gold, silver, bronze, orichalcum and copper coinage[1] (see: Roman metallurgy). From its introduction to the Republic, during the third century BC, well into Imperial times, Roman currency saw many changes in form, denomination, and composition. A persistent feature was the inflationary debasement and replacement of coins over the centuries. Notable examples of this followed the reforms of Diocletian. This trend continued into Byzantine times. Due to the economic power and longevity of the Roman state, Roman currency was widely used throughout western Eurasia and northern Africa from classical times into the Middle Ages. It served as a model for the currencies of the Muslim caliphates and the European states during the Middle Ages and the Modern Era. Roman currency names survive today in many countries (e.g., the Arabic dinar (from the denarius coin), the British pound and Mexican peso (both translations of the Roman libra)). Contents 1 Authority to mint coins 1.1 Roman Republic: c. 500 – 27 BC 2 Iconography and design 2.1 Imperial iconography 3 Value and composition 3.1 Debasement 3.2 Equivalences 4 See also 5 References 5.1 Footnotes 5.2 Bibliography 6 External links Authority to mint coins[edit] The manufacture of coins in the Roman culture, dating from about the 4th century BC, significantly influenced later development of coin minting in Europe. The origin of the word "mint" is ascribed to the manufacture of silver coin at Rome in 269 BC near the temple of Juno Moneta. This goddess became the personification of money, and her name was applied both to money and to its place of manufacture. Roman mints were spread widely across the Empire, and were sometimes used for propaganda purposes. The populace often learned of a new Roman Emperor when coins appeared with the new Emperor's portrait. Some of the emperors who ruled only for a short time made sure that a coin bore their image[citation needed]; Quietus, for example, ruled only part of the Roman Empire from 260 to 261 AD, and yet he issued two coins bearing his image. The Romans cast their larger copper coins in clay moulds carrying distinctive markings, not because they did not know about striking, but because it was not suitable for such large masses of metal. Roman Republic: c. 500 – 27 BC[edit] Main article: Roman Republican currency Bronze aes signatum produced by the Roman Republic after 450 BC. Roman adoption of metallic commodity money was a late development in monetary history. Bullion bars and ingots were used as money in Mesopotamia since the 7th millennium BC; and Greeks in Asia Minor had pioneered the use of coinage (which they employed in addition to other more primitive, monetary mediums of exchange) as early as the 7th century BC.[2] Coinage proper was only introduced by the Roman Republican government c. 300 BC. The greatest city of the Magna Graecia region in southern Italy, and several other Italian cities, already had a long tradition of using coinage by this time and produced them in large quantities during the 4th century BC to pay for their wars against the inland Italian groups encroaching on their territory. For these reasons, the Romans would have certainly known about coinage systems long before their government actually introduced them. The reason behind Rome's adoption of coinage was likely cultural. The Romans had no pressing economic need, but they wanted to emulate Greek culture; they considered the institution of minted money a significant feature of that culture. However, Roman coinage initially saw very limited use.[3] The type of money introduced by Rome was unlike that found elsewhere in the ancient Mediterranean. It combined a number of uncommon elements. One example is the large bronze bullion, the aes signatum (Latin for signed bronze). It measured about 160 by 90 millimetres (6.3 by 3.5 in) and weighed around 1,500 to 1,600 grams (53 to 56 oz), being made out of a highly leaded tin bronze. Although similar metal currency bars had been produced in Italy and northern Etruscan areas, these had been made of Aes grave, an unrefined metal with a high iron content.[4] Along with the aes signatum, the Roman state also issued a series of bronze and silver coins that emulated the styles of those produced in Greek cities.[5] Produced using the manner of manufacture then utilised in Greek Naples, the designs of these early coins were also heavily influenced by Greek designs.[6] The designs on the coinage of the Republican period displayed a "solid conservatism", usually illustrating mythical scenes or personifications of various gods and goddesses.[7] Iconography and design[edit] Imperial iconography[edit] The most commonly used coin denominations and their relative sizes during Roman times. Coins of the Roman Republic and Empire - from Cassell's History of England, Vol. I - anonymous author and artists The imagery on coins took an important step when Julius Caesar issued coins bearing his own portrait. While moneyers had earlier issued coins with portraits of ancestors, Caesar's was the first Roman coinage to feature the portrait of a living individual. The tradition continued following Caesar's assassination, although the imperators from time to time also produced coins featuring the traditional deities and personifications found on earlier coins. The image of the Roman emperor took on a special importance in the centuries that followed, because during the empire, the emperor embodied the state and its policies. The names of moneyers continued to appear on the coins until the middle of Augustus' reign. Although the duty of moneyers during the Empire is not known, since the position was not abolished, it is believed that they still had some influence over the imagery of the coins. The main focus of the imagery during the empire was on the portrait of the emperor. Coins were an important means of disseminating this image throughout the empire. Coins often attempted to make the emperor appear god-like through associating the emperor with attributes normally seen in divinities, or emphasizing the special relationship between the emperor and a particular deity by producing a preponderance of coins depicting that deity. During his campaign against Pompey, Caesar issued a variety of types that featured images of either Venus or Aeneas, attempting to associate himself with his divine ancestors. An example of an emperor who went to an extreme in proclaiming divine status was Commodus. In 192 A.D., he issued a series of coins depicting his bust clad in a lion-skin (the usual depiction of Hercules) on the obverse, and an inscription proclaiming that he was the Roman incarnation of Hercules on the reverse. Although Commodus was excessive in his depiction of his image, this extreme case is indicative of the objective of many emperors in the exploitation of their portraits. While the emperor is by far the most frequent portrait on the obverse of coins, heirs apparent, predecessors, and other family members, such as empresses, were also featured. To aid in succession, the legitimacy of an heir was affirmed by producing coins for that successor. This was done from the time of Augustus till the end of the empire. Featuring the portrait of an individual on a coin, which became legal in 44 BC, caused the coin to be viewed as embodying the attributes of the individual portrayed. Dio wrote that following the death of Caligula the Senate demonetized his coinage, and ordered that they be melted. Regardless of whether or not this actually occurred, it demonstrates the importance and meaning that was attached to the imagery on a coin. The philosopher Epictetus jokingly wrote: "Whose image does this sestertius carry? Trajan's? Give it to me. Nero's? Throw it away, it is unacceptable, it is rotten." Although the writer did not seriously expect people to get rid of their coins, this quotation demonstrates that the Romans attached a moral value to the images on their coins. Unlike the obverse, which during the imperial period almost always featured a portrait, the reverse was far more varied in its depiction. During the late Republic there were often political messages to the imagery, especially during the periods of civil war. However, by the middle of the Empire, although there were types that made important statements, and some that were overtly political or propagandistic in nature, the majority of the types were stock images of personifications or deities. While some images can be related to the policy or actions of a particular emperor, many of the choices seem arbitrary and the personifications and deities were so prosaic that their names were often omitted, as they were readily recognizable by their appearance and attributes alone. It can be argued that within this backdrop of mostly indistinguishable types, exceptions would be far more pronounced. Atypical reverses are usually seen during and after periods of war, at which time emperors make various claims of liberation, subjugation, and pacification. Some of these reverse images can clearly be classified as propaganda. An example struck by emperor Philip in 244 features a legend proclaiming the establishment of peace with Persia; in truth, Rome had been forced to pay large sums in tribute to the Persians. Although it is difficult to make accurate generalizations about reverse imagery, as this was something that varied by emperor, some trends do exist. An example is reverse types of the military emperors during the second half of the third century, where virtually all of the types were the common and standard personifications and deities. A possible explanation for the lack of originality is that these emperors were attempting to present conservative images to establish their legitimacy, something that many of these emperors lacked. Although these emperors relied on traditional reverse types, their portraits often emphasized their authority through stern gazes,[8][citation needed] and even featured the bust of the emperor clad in armor.[9] Value and composition[edit] Unlike most modern coins, Roman coins had (at least in the early centuries) significant intrinsic value. However, while the gold and silver issues contained precious metals, the value of a coin could be slightly higher than its precious metal content, so they were not, strictly speaking, equivalent to bullion. Also, over the course of time the purity and weight of the silver coins were reduced. Estimates of the value of the denarius range from 1.6 to 2.85 times its metal content,[citation needed] thought to equal the purchasing power of 10 modern British Pound Sterling at the beginning of the Roman Empire to around 18 Pound Sterling by its end (comparing bread, wine and meat prices) and, over the same period, around one to three days' pay for a Legionary.[10] The coinage system that existed in Egypt until the time of Diocletian's monetary reform was a closed system based upon the heavily debased tetradrachm. Although the value of these tetradrachms can be reckoned as being equivalent to that of the denarius, their precious metal content was always much lower. Elsewhere also, not all coins that circulated contained precious metals, as the value of these coins was too great to be convenient for everyday purchases. A dichotomy existed between the coins with an intrinsic value and those with only a token value. This is reflected in the infrequent and inadequate production of bronze coinage during the Republic, where from the time of Sulla till the time of Augustus no bronze coins were minted at all; even during the periods when bronze coins were produced, their workmanship was sometimes very crude and of low quality. Debasement[edit] The rapid decline in silver purity of the antoninianus The type of coins issued changed under the coinage reform of Diocletian, the heavily debased antoninianus (double denarius) was replaced with a variety of new denominations, and a new range of imagery was introduced that attempted to convey different ideas. The new government set up by Diocletian was a tetrarchy, or rule by four, with each emperor receiving a separate territory to rule. The new imagery includes a large, stern portrait that is representative of the emperor. This image was not meant to show the actual portrait of a particular emperor, but was instead a character that embodied the power that the emperor possessed. The reverse type was equally universal, featuring the spirit (or genius) of the Romans. The introduction of a new type of government and a new system of coinage represents an attempt by Diocletian to return peace and security to Rome, after the previous century of constant warfare and uncertainty. Diocletian characterizes the emperor as an interchangeable authority figure by depicting him with a generalized image. He tries to emphasize unity amongst the Romans by featuring the spirit of Romans (Sutherland 254). The reverse types of coins of the late Empire emphasized general themes, and discontinued the more specific personifications depicted previously. The reverse types featured legends that proclaimed the glory of Rome, the glory of the army, victory against the "barbarians", the restoration of happy times, and the greatness of the emperor. These general types persisted even after the adoption of Christianity as the state religion of the Roman Empire. Muted Christian imagery, such as standards that featured Christograms (the chi-rho monogram for Jesus Christ's name in Greek) were introduced, but with a few rare exceptions, there were no explicitly Christian themes. From the time of Constantine until the "end" of the Roman Empire, coins featured almost indistinguishable idealized portraits and general proclamations of greatness. Although the denarius remained the backbone of the Roman economy from its introduction in 211 BC until it ceased to be normally minted in the middle of the third century, the purity and weight of the coin slowly, but inexorably, decreased. The problem of debasement in the Roman economy appears to be pervasive, although the severity of the debasement often paralleled the strength or weakness of the Empire. While it is not clear why debasement was such a common occurrence for the Romans, it's believed that it was caused by several factors, including a lack of precious metals and inadequacies in state finances. When introduced, the denarius contained nearly pure silver at a theoretical weight of approximately 4.5 grams, but from the time of Nero onwards the tendency was nearly always for its purity to be decreased. The theoretical standard, although not usually met in practice, remained fairly stable throughout the Republic, with the notable exception of times of war. The large number of coins required to raise an army and pay for supplies often necessitated the debasement of the coinage. An example of this is the denarii that were struck by Mark Antony to pay his army during his battles against Octavian. These coins, slightly smaller in diameter than a normal denarius, were made of noticeably debased silver. The obverse features a galley and the name Antony, while the reverse features the name of the particular legion that each issue was intended for (hoard evidence shows that these coins remained in circulation over 200 years after they were minted, due to their lower silver content). The coinage of the Julio-Claudians remained stable at 4 grams of silver, until the debasement of Nero in 64, when the silver content was reduced to 3.8 grams, perhaps due to the cost of rebuilding the city after fire consumed a considerable portion of Rome. The denarius continued to decline slowly in purity, with a notable reduction instituted by Septimius Severus. This was followed by the introduction of a double denarius piece, differentiated from the denarius by the radiate crown worn by the emperor. The coin is commonly called the antoninianus by numismatists after the emperor Caracalla, who introduced the coin in early 215. Although nominally valued at two denarii, the antoninianus never contained more than 1.6 times the amount of silver of the denarius. The profit of minting a coin valued at two denarii, but weighing only about one and a half times as much is obvious; the reaction to these coins by the public is unknown. As the number of antoniniani minted increased, the number of denarii minted decreased, until the denarius ceased to be minted in significant quantities by the middle of the third century. Again, coinage saw its greatest debasement during times of war and uncertainty. The second half of the third century was rife with this war and uncertainty, and the silver content of the antonianus fell to only 2%, losing almost any appearance of being silver. During this time the aureus remained slightly more stable, before it too became smaller and more base (lower gold content and higher base metal content) before Diocletian's reform. The decline in the silver content to the point where coins contained virtually no silver at all was countered by the monetary reform of Aurelian in 274. The standard for silver in the antonianus was set at twenty parts copper to one part silver, and the coins were noticeably marked as containing that amount (XXI in Latin or KA in Greek). Despite the reform of Aurelian, silver content continued to decline, until the monetary reform of Diocletian. In addition to establishing the tetrarchy, Diocletian devised the following system of denominations: an aureus struck at the standard of 60 to the pound, a new silver coin struck at the old Neronian standard known as the argenteus, and a new large bronze coin that contained two percent silver. Diocletian issued an Edict on Maximum Prices in 301, which attempted to establish the legal maximum prices that could be charged for goods and services. The attempt to establish maximum prices was an exercise in futility as maximum prices were impossible to enforce. The Edict was reckoned in terms of denarii, although no such coin had been struck for over 50 years (it is believed that the bronze follis was valued at ​12 1⁄2 denarii). Like earlier reforms, this too eroded and was replaced by an uncertain coinage consisting mostly of gold and bronze. The exact relationship and denomination of the bronze issues of a variety of sizes is not known, and is believed to have fluctuated heavily on the market. The exact reason that Roman coinage sustained constant debasement is not known, but the most common theories involve inflation, trade with India, which drained silver from the Mediterranean world, and inadequacies in state finances. It is clear from papyri that the pay of the Roman soldier increased from 900 sestertii a year under Augustus to 2000 sestertii a year under Septimius Severus and the price of grain more than tripled indicating that fall in real wages and a moderate inflation occurred during this time.[11] Another reason for debasement was lack of raw metal with which to produce coins. Italy itself contains no large or reliable mines for precious metals; therefore the precious metals for coinage had to be obtained elsewhere. The majority of the precious metals that Rome obtained during its period of expansion arrived in the form of war booty from defeated territories, and subsequent tribute and taxes by new-conquered lands. When Rome ceased to expand, the precious metals for coinage then came from newly mined silver, such as from Greece and Spain, and from melting older coins. Without a constant influx of precious metals from an outside source, and with the expense of continual wars, it would seem reasonable that coins might be debased to increase the amount that the government could spend. This explanation for the debasement of coinage is that it allowed the state to spend more than it had. By decreasing the amount of silver in its coins, Rome could produce more coins and "stretch" its budget. As time progressed, the trade deficit of the west, because of its buying of grain and other commodities, led to a currency drainage in Rome. Equivalences[edit] The first rows show the values of each boldface coin in the first column in relation to the coins in the following columns: Early Republic values[12][13] (after 211 BC) Denarius Sestertius Dupondius As Semis Quincunx Triens Quadrans Uncia Denarius 1 4 5 10 20 24 30 40 120 Sestertius ​1⁄4 1 ​1  1⁄4 ​2  1⁄2 5 6 ​7  1⁄2 10 30 Dupondius ​1⁄5 ​4⁄5 1 2 4 ​4  4⁄5 6 8 24 As ​1⁄10 ​2⁄5 ​1⁄2 1 2 ​2  2⁄5 3 4 12 Semis ​1⁄20 ​1⁄5 ​1⁄4 ​1⁄2 1 ​1  1⁄5 ​1  1⁄2 2 6 Quincunx ​1⁄24 ​1⁄6 ​5⁄24 ​5⁄12 ​5⁄6 1 ​1  1⁄4 ​1  2⁄3 5 Triens ​1⁄30 ​2⁄15 ​1⁄6 ​1⁄3 ​2⁄3 ​4⁄5 1 ​1  1⁄3 4 Quadrans ​1⁄40 ​1⁄10 ​1⁄8 ​1⁄4 ​1⁄2 ​3⁄5 ​3⁄4 1 3 Uncia ​1⁄120 ​1⁄30 ​1⁄24 ​1⁄12 ​1⁄6 ​1⁄5 ​1⁄4 ​1⁄3 1 Augustan values (27 BC – AD 301) Aureus Quinarius Aureus Denarius Quinarius Sestertius Dupondius As Semis Quadrans Aureus 1 2 25 50 100 200 400 800 1600 Quinarius Aureus ​1⁄2 1 ​12  1⁄2 25 50 100 200 400 800 Denarius ​1⁄25 ​2⁄25 1 2 4 8 16 32 64 Quinarius Argenteus ​1⁄50 ​1⁄25 ​1⁄2 1 2 4 8 16 32 Sestertius ​1⁄100 ​1⁄50 ​1⁄4 ​1⁄2 1 2 4 8 16 Dupondius ​1⁄200 ​1⁄100 ​1⁄8 ​1⁄4 ​1⁄2 1 2 4 8 As ​1⁄400 ​1⁄200 ​1⁄16 ​1⁄8 ​1⁄4 ​1⁄2 1 2 4 Semis ​1⁄800 ​1⁄400 ​1⁄32 ​1⁄16 ​1⁄8 ​1⁄4 ​1⁄2 1 2 Quadrans ​1⁄1600 ​1⁄800 ​1⁄64 ​1⁄32 ​1⁄16 ​1⁄8 ​1⁄4 ​1⁄2 1 Diocletian values (301–305) Solidus Argenteus Nummus Radiate Laureate Denarius Solidus 1 10 40 200 500 1000 Argenteus ​1⁄10 1 4 20 50 100 Nummus ​1⁄40 ​1⁄4 1 5 ​12  1⁄2 25 Radiate ​1⁄200 ​1⁄20 ​1⁄5 1 ​2  1⁄2 5 Laureate ​1⁄500 ​1⁄50 ​2⁄25 ​2⁄5 1 2 Denarius ​1⁄1000 ​1⁄100 ​1⁄25 ​1⁄5 ​1⁄2 1 Late Empire coin values (337–476) Solidus Miliarense Siliqua Follis Nummus Solidus 1 12 24 180 7200 Miliarense ​1⁄12 1 2 15 600 Siliqua ​1⁄24 ​1⁄2 1 ​7  1⁄2 300 Follis ​1⁄180 ​1⁄15 ​2⁄15 1 40 Nummus ​1⁄7200 ​1⁄600 ​1⁄300 ​1⁄40 1 See also[edit] Numismatics portal Money portal Cupellation List of historical currencies Roman economy Roman Republican coinage Roman provincial currency Byzantine coinage Visigothic coinage Sasanian coinage Roman Republican moneyers Tessera Spintria Ancient Symbols (Unicode block) References[edit] Footnotes[edit] ^ "Blanchard and Company, Inc. - The Twelve Caesars". Retrieved February 8, 2017. ^ Metcalf 2012, p. 33. ^ Burnett 1987. pp. 15–16. ^ Burnett 1987. p. 3. ^ Burnett 1987. pp. 4–5. ^ Burnett 1987. p. 16. ^ Reece 1970. p. 19. ^ Trentinella, Rosemarie (October 2003). "Roman Portrait Sculpture: The Stylistic Cycle". www.metmuseum.org. Retrieved 2019-08-13. ^ "Probus". www.forumancientcoins.com. Retrieved 2019-05-06. ^ "Buying Power of Ancient Coins". Archived from the original on February 10, 2013. Retrieved 2013-02-10. ^ ancientcoins.biz ^ W.G. Sayles, Ancient Coin Collecting III: The Roman World-Politics and Propaganda, Iola, 1997, p. 20. ^ William Boyne, A Manual of Roman Coins: from the earliest period to the extinction of the empire, W. H. Johnston, 1865, p. 7. Available online. Bibliography[edit] Burnett, Andrew (1987). Coinage in the Roman World. London: Seaby. ISBN 978-0-900652-84-4. Cohen, Henry, Description historiques des monnaies frappées sous l'Empire romain, Paris, 1882, 8 vols. There exists online version of this Cohen's catalogue Greene, Kevin. Archaeology of the Roman Economy. Berkeley, California: University of California Press, 1986. Howgego, Christopher. Ancient History from Coins. London: Routledge, 1995. Jones, A. H. M. The Roman Economy: Studies in Ancient Economic and Administrative History. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1974. Melville Jones, John R., 'A Dictionary of Ancient Roman Coins', London, Spink 2003. Metcalf, William E. (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Coinage. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780195305746. Reece, Richard (1970). Roman Coins. London: Ernest Benn Limited. ISBN 978-0-510-06151-7. Salmon, E. Togo. Roman Coins and Public Life under the Empire. Ann Arbor, Michigan: The University of Michigan Press, 1999. Suarez, Rasiel. The Encyclopedia of Roman Imperial Coins. Dirty Old Books, 2005. Sutherland, C. H. V. Roman Coins. New York: G. P. (Also published by Barrie and Jenkins in London in 1974 with ISBN 0-214-66808-8) Van Meter, David. The Handbook of Roman Imperial Coins. Laurion Press, 1990. Vecchi, Italo. Italian Cast Coinage. A descriptive catalogue of the cast coinage of Rome and Italy. London Ancient Coins, London 2013. Hard bound in quarto format, 84 pages, 92 plates. ISBN 978-0-9575784-0-1 External links[edit] A Collection of Flavian coins Wikimedia Commons has media related to Roman currency. Library resources about Roman currency Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films v t e Currencies of Ancient Rome Proto-currency Bronze Aes rude Aes signatum Republican era Gold Aureus Silver Denarius Sestertius Victoriatus Quadrigatus Bronze and copper Dupondius (2 asses) As (1) Dodrans (​3⁄4) Bes (​2⁄3) Semis (​1⁄2) Quincunx (​5⁄12) Triens (​1⁄3) Quadrans (​1⁄4) Sextans (​1⁄6) Uncia (​1⁄12) Semuncia (​1⁄24) Early Empire Gold Aureus Dacicus Silver Antoninianus (32 asses) Denarius (16) Quinarius (8) Copper Double sestertius (8) Sestertius (​2  1⁄2; later 4) Dupondius (2) As (1) Semis (​1⁄2) Quadrans (​1⁄4) Diocletian era Gold Solidus Silver Argenteus Nummus Copper Radiate Laureate Denarius Late Empire Gold Solidus Tremissis Silver Miliarense Siliqua Copper and bronze Follis Nummus Constantinian bronzes Centenionalis Ancient Rome Portal Numismatics Portal Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Roman_currency&oldid=996134059" Categories: Coins of ancient Rome Numismatics Economic history of Italy Ancient Roman sculpture Hidden categories: All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from April 2018 Articles containing Latin-language text Articles with unsourced statements from September 2007 Articles with unsourced statements from February 2012 Commons link is on Wikidata Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Languages العربية Bosanski Català Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Français Galego 贛語 Bahasa Indonesia Interlingua Italiano ქართული Latina Lietuvių Nederlands 日本語 Polski Português Română Русский Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Svenska Українська ייִדיש Edit links This page was last edited on 24 December 2020, at 19:02 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2306 ---- Fall of Constantinople - Wikipedia Fall of Constantinople From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search 1453 capture of the capital of the Byzantine Empire For other sieges of the city, see List of sieges of Constantinople. Fall of Constantinople Part of the Byzantine–Ottoman Wars and Ottoman wars in Europe The last siege of Constantinople (1453), French miniature by Jean Le Tavernier after 1455. Date 6 April – 29 May 1453 (53 days) Location Constantinople (present-day Istanbul) 41°01′00″N 28°58′37″E / 41.0167°N 28.9769°E / 41.0167; 28.9769Coordinates: 41°01′00″N 28°58′37″E / 41.0167°N 28.9769°E / 41.0167; 28.9769 Result Ottoman victory Fall of the Byzantine Empire Territorial changes Ottoman Empire annexes the remaining Byzantine territories; Constantinople becomes its new capital The Morea and Trebizond continue as Byzantine rump states, until their conquest in 1460 and 1461 respectively Belligerents Ottoman Empire Byzantine Empire  Republic of Genoa  Republic of Venice  Kingdom of Sicily Papal States Ottoman defectors Commanders and leaders Mehmed II Çandarlı Halil  Zagan Pasha Suleiman Baltoghlu (WIA) Karaca Pasha Hamza Bey Konstantinos XI † Loukas Notaras  Theophilos Palaiologos † Giovanni Giustiniani (DOW) Gabriele Trevisano (POW) Cardinal Isidore (POW) Orhan Çelebi  Don Francisco de Toledo † Strength Ottomans Land forces: 50,000–80,000[note 1] 5,000–10,000 Janissaries Various cannon and bombards 20 horse transports Naval forces: 31 Galleys 75 large row boats Byzantines Land forces: 7,000–10,000 600 Ottoman defectors[1] 200 Papal archers[2] Naval forces: 26 ships Casualties and losses Unknown but likely heavy 4,000 killed[3] 30,000 enslaved[4][5] v t e Byzantine–Ottoman wars Kulaca Hisar Bapheus Dimbos Catalan campaign Bursa Pelekanon Nicaea Nicomedia 1st Gallipoli 2nd Gallipoli Adrianople 1st Thessalonica Philadelphia 1st Constantinople 2nd Constantinople 3rd Constantinople 2nd Thessalonica 4th Constantinople Trebizond The Fall of Constantinople (Byzantine Greek: Ἅλωσις τῆς Κωνσταντινουπόλεως, romanized: Hálōsis tē̂s Kōnstantinoupóleōs; Turkish: İstanbul'un Fethi, lit. 'Conquest of Istanbul') was the capture of the Byzantine Empire's capital by the Ottoman Empire. The city fell on 29 May 1453,[6] the culmination of a 53-day siege which had begun on 6 April 1453. The attacking Ottoman army, which significantly outnumbered Constantinople's defenders, was commanded by the 21-year-old Sultan Mehmed II (later called "the Conqueror"), while the Byzantine army was led by Emperor Constantine XI Palaiologos. After conquering the city, Mehmed II made Constantinople the new Ottoman capital, replacing Adrianople. The Fall of Constantinople marked the end of the Byzantine Empire, and effectively the end of the Roman Empire, a state which dated back to 27 BC and lasted nearly 1,500 years.[7] The capture of Constantinople, a city which marked the divide between Europe and Asia Minor, also allowed the Ottomans to more effectively invade mainland Europe, eventually leading to Ottoman control of much of the Balkan peninsula. The conquest of Constantinople and the fall of the Byzantine Empire[8] was a key event of the Late Middle Ages and is sometimes considered the end of the Medieval period.[9] The city's fall also stood as a turning point in military history. Since ancient times, cities and castles had depended upon ramparts and walls to repel invaders. However, Constantinople's substantial fortifications were overcome with the use of gunpowder, specifically in the form of large cannons and bombards.[10] Contents 1 State of the Byzantine Empire 2 Preparations 2.1 European support 2.2 Strength 2.2.1 Ottoman dispositions and strategies 2.2.2 Byzantine dispositions and strategies 3 Siege 3.1 Final assault 3.2 Plundering phase 4 Aftermath 4.1 Third Rome 4.2 Impact on the Churches 5 Legacy 5.1 Prophecies 5.2 Legends 5.3 Cultural impact 5.4 Impact on the Renaissance 5.5 Renaming of the city 5.6 In historical fiction 6 Primary sources 6.1 Eyewitness accounts 6.2 Non-eyewitness accounts 7 Notes 8 References 9 Further reading 10 External links State of the Byzantine Empire[edit] Constantinople had been an imperial capital since its consecration in 330 under Roman emperor Constantine the Great. In the following eleven centuries, the city had been besieged many times but was captured only once before: the Sack of Constantinople during the Fourth Crusade in 1204.[11]:304 The crusaders established an unstable Latin state in and around Constantinople while the remainder of the Byzantine Empire splintered into a number of successor states, notably Nicaea, Epirus and Trebizond. They fought as allies against the Latin establishments, but also fought among themselves for the Byzantine throne. The Nicaeans eventually reconquered Constantinople from the Latins in 1261, reestablishing the Byzantine Empire under the Palaiologos dynasty. Thereafter, there was little peace for the much-weakened empire as it fended off successive attacks by the Latins, Serbs, Bulgarians and Ottoman Turks.[11][page needed][12][13][14] Between 1346 and 1349 the Black Death killed almost half of the inhabitants of Constantinople.[15] The city was further depopulated by the general economic and territorial decline of the empire, and by 1453, it consisted of a series of walled villages separated by vast fields encircled by the fifth-century Theodosian Walls. By 1450, the empire was exhausted and had shrunk to a few square kilometers outside the city of Constantinople itself, the Princes' Islands in the Sea of Marmara and the Peloponnese with its cultural center at Mystras. The Empire of Trebizond, an independent successor state that formed in the aftermath of the Fourth Crusade, was also present at the time on the coast of the Black Sea. Preparations[edit] When Mehmed II succeeded his father in 1451, he was just nineteen years old. Many European courts assumed that the young Ottoman ruler would not seriously challenge Christian hegemony in the Balkans and the Aegean.[16] This calculation was boosted by Mehmed's friendly overtures to the European envoys at his new court.[11]:373 But Mehmed's mild words were not matched by his actions. By early 1452, work began on the construction of a second fortress (Rumeli hisarı) on the European side of the Bosphorus,[17] several miles north of Constantinople. The new fortress sat directly across the strait from the Anadolu Hisarı fortress, built by Mehmed's great-grandfather Bayezid I. This pair of fortresses ensured complete control of sea traffic on the Bosphorus[11]:373 and defended against attack by the Genoese colonies on the Black Sea coast to the north. In fact, the new fortress was called Boğazkesen, which means "strait-blocker" or "throat-cutter". The wordplay emphasizes its strategic position: in Turkish boğaz means both "strait" and "throat". In October 1452, Mehmed ordered Turakhan Beg to station a large garrison force in the Peloponnese to block Thomas and Demetrios (despotes in Southern Greece) from providing aid to their brother Constantine XI Palaiologos during the impending siege of Constantinople.[note 2] Karaca Pasha, the beylerbeyi of Rumelia, sent men to prepare the roads from Adrianople to Constantinople so that bridges could cope with massive cannon. Fifty carpenters and 200 artisans also strengthened the roads where necessary.[3] The Greek historian Michael Critobulus quotes Mehmed II's speech to his soldiers before the siege:[19]:23 My friends and men of my empire! You all know very well that our forefathers secured this kingdom that we now hold at the cost of many struggles and very great dangers and that, having passed it along in succession from their fathers, from father to son, they handed it down to me. For some of the oldest of you were sharers in many of the exploits carried through by them—those at least of you who are of maturer years—and the younger of you have heard of these deeds from your fathers. They are not such very ancient events nor of such a sort as to be forgotten through the lapse of time. Still, the eyewitness of those who have seen testifies better than does the hearing of deeds that happened but yesterday or the day before. European support[edit] Byzantine Emperor Constantine XI swiftly understood Mehmed's true intentions and turned to Western Europe for help; but now the price of centuries of war and enmity between the eastern and western churches had to be paid. Since the mutual excommunications of 1054, the Pope in Rome was committed to establishing authority over the eastern church. The union was agreed by the Byzantine Emperor Michael VIII Palaiologos in 1274, at the Second Council of Lyon, and indeed, some Palaiologoi emperors had since been received into the Latin Church. Emperor John VIII Palaiologos had also recently negotiated union with Pope Eugene IV, with the Council of Florence of 1439 proclaiming a Bull of Union. The imperial efforts to impose union were met with strong resistance in Constantinople. A propaganda initiative was stimulated by anti-unionist Orthodox partisans in Constantinople; the population, as well as the laity and leadership of the Byzantine Church, became bitterly divided. Latent ethnic hatred between Greeks and Italians, stemming from the events of the Massacre of the Latins in 1182 by the Greeks and the Sack of Constantinople in 1204 by the Latins, played a significant role. Ultimately, the attempted union between east and west failed, greatly annoying Pope Nicholas V and the hierarchy of the Roman church. The Byzantine Empire in the first half of the 15th century. Thessaloniki was captured by the Ottomans in 1430. A few islands in the Aegean and the Propontis remained under Byzantine rule until 1453 (not shown on the map). In the summer of 1452, when Rumelı Hisari was completed and the threat of the Ottomans had become imminent, Constantine wrote to the Pope, promising to implement the union, which was declared valid by a half-hearted imperial court on 12 December 1452.[11]:373 Although he was eager for an advantage, Pope Nicholas V did not have the influence the Byzantines thought he had over the Western kings and princes, some of whom were wary of increasing papal control. Furthermore, these Western rulers did not have the wherewithal to contribute to the effort, especially in light of the weakened state of France and England from the Hundred Years' War, Spain's involvement in the Reconquista, the internecine fighting in the Holy Roman Empire, and Hungary and Poland's defeat at the Battle of Varna of 1444. Although some troops did arrive from the mercantile city-states in northern Italy, the Western contribution was not adequate to counterbalance Ottoman strength. Some Western individuals, however, came to help defend the city on their own account. Cardinal Isidore, funded by the Pope, arrived in 1452 with 200 archers.[20] An accomplished soldier from Genoa, Giovanni Giustiniani, arrived in January 1453 with 400 men from Genoa and 300 men from Genoese Chios.[21]:83–84 As a specialist in defending walled cities, Giustiniani was immediately given the overall command of the defence of the land walls by the Emperor. Around the same time, the captains of the Venetian ships that happened to be present in the Golden Horn offered their services to the Emperor, barring contrary orders from Venice, and Pope Nicholas undertook to send three ships laden with provisions, which set sail near the end of March.[21]:81 Meanwhile, in Venice, deliberations were taking place concerning the kind of assistance the Republic would lend to Constantinople. The Senate decided upon sending a fleet in February 1453, but the fleet's departure was delayed until April, when it was already too late for ships to assist in battle.[22][page needed][21]:85 Further undermining Byzantine morale, seven Italian ships with around 700 men, despite having sworn to defend Constantinople, slipped out of the capital the moment when Giustiniani arrived. At the same time, Constantine's attempts to appease the Sultan with gifts ended with the execution of the Emperor's ambassadors.[11]:373[23][24][25][26][27][28] Restored Walls of Constantinople The chain that closed off the entrance to the Golden Horn in 1453, now on display in the İstanbul Archaeology Museums. Fearing a possible naval attack along the shores of the Golden Horn, Emperor Constantine XI ordered that a defensive chain be placed at the mouth of the harbour. This chain, which floated on logs, was strong enough to prevent any Turkish ship from entering the harbour. This device was one of two that gave the Byzantines some hope of extending the siege until the possible arrival of foreign help.[22]:380 This strategy was enforced because in 1204, the armies of the Fourth Crusade successfully circumvented Constantinople's land defences by breaching the Golden Horn Wall. Another strategy employed by the Byzantines was the repair and fortification of the Land Wall (Theodosian Walls). Emperor Constantine deemed it necessary to ensure that the Blachernae district's wall was the most fortified because that section of the wall protruded northwards. The land fortifications consisted of a 60 ft (18 m) wide moat fronting inner and outer crenellated walls studded with towers every 45–55 metres.[29] Strength[edit] Map of Constantinople and the dispositions of the defenders and the besiegers The army defending Constantinople was relatively small, totalling about 7,000 men, 2,000 of whom were foreigners.[note 3] At the onset of the siege, probably fewer than 50,000 people were living within the walls, including the refugees from the surrounding area.[30]:32 [note 4] Turkish commander Dorgano, who was in Constantinople working for the Emperor, was also guarding one of the quarters of the city on the seaward side with the Turks in his pay. These Turks kept loyal to the Emperor and perished in the ensuing battle. The defending army's Genoese corps were well trained and equipped, while the rest of the army consisted of small numbers of well-trained soldiers, armed civilians, sailors and volunteer forces from foreign communities, and finally monks. The garrison used a few small-calibre artillery pieces, which in the end proved ineffective. The rest of the citizens repaired walls, stood guard on observation posts, collected and distributed food provisions, and collected gold and silver objects from churches to melt down into coins to pay the foreign soldiers. The Ottomans had a much larger force. Recent studies and Ottoman archival data state that there were some 50,000–80,000 Ottoman soldiers, including between 5,000 and 10,000 Janissaries,[31][page needed], 70 cannons[32]:139–140[30][page needed][33][page needed], an elite infantry corps. Contemporaneous Western witnesses of the siege, who tend to exaggerate the military power of the Sultan, provide disparate and higher numbers ranging from 160,000 to 300,000[31][page needed](Niccolò Barbaro:[34] 160,000; the Florentine merchant Jacopo Tedaldi[35] and the Great Logothete George Sphrantzes:[36][page needed] 200,000; the Cardinal Isidore of Kiev[37] and the Archbishop of Mytilene Leonardo di Chio:[38] 300,000).[39] Ottoman dispositions and strategies[edit] The Dardanelles Gun, cast by Munir Ali in 1464, is similar to bombards used by the Ottoman besiegers of Constantinople in 1453 (British Royal Armouries collection). Mehmed built a fleet (partially manned by Spanish sailors from Gallipoli) to besiege the city from the sea.[30][page needed] Contemporary estimates of the strength of the Ottoman fleet span from 110 ships to 430. (Tedaldi:[35] 110; Barbaro:[34] 145; Ubertino Pusculo:[40] 160, Isidore of Kiev[37] and Leonardo di Chio:[41] 200–250; (Sphrantzes):[36][page needed] 430) A more realistic modern estimate predicts a fleet strength of 110 ships comprising 70 large galleys, 5 ordinary galleys, 10 smaller galleys, 25 large rowing boats, and 75 horse-transports.[30]:44 Before the siege of Constantinople, it was known that the Ottomans had the ability to cast medium-sized cannons, but the range of some pieces they were able to field far surpassed the defenders' expectations.[11]:374 The Ottomans deployed a number of cannons, anywhere from 50 cannons to 200. They were built at foundries that employed Turkish cannon founders and technicians, most notably Saruca, in addition to at least one foreign cannon founder, Orban (also called Urban). Most of the cannons at the siege were built by Turkish engineers, including a large bombard by Saruca, while one cannon was built by Orban, who also contributed a large bombard.[42][43] Orban, a Hungarian (though some suggest he was German), was a somewhat mysterious figure.[11]:374 His 27 feet (8.2 m) long cannon was named "Basilica" and was able to hurl a 600 lb (270 kg) stone ball over a mile (1.6 km).[44] Orban initially tried to sell his services to the Byzantines, but they were unable to secure the funds needed to hire him. Orban then left Constantinople and approached Mehmed II, claiming that his weapon could blast "the walls of Babylon itself". Given abundant funds and materials, the Hungarian engineer built the gun within three months at Edirne.[21]:77–78 However, this was the only cannon that Orban built for the Ottoman forces at Constantinople,[42][43] and it had several drawbacks: it took three hours to reload; cannonballs were in very short supply; and the cannon is said to have collapsed under its own recoil after six weeks. The account of the cannon's collapse is disputed,[31][page needed] given that it was only reported in the letter of Archbishop Leonardo di Chio[38] and in the later, and often unreliable, Russian chronicle of Nestor Iskander.[note 5] Modern painting of Mehmed and the Ottoman Army approaching Constantinople with a giant bombard, by Fausto Zonaro. Having previously established a large foundry about 150 miles (240 km) away, Mehmed now had to undertake the painstaking process of transporting his massive artillery pieces. In preparation for the final assault, Mehmed had an artillery train of 70 large pieces dragged from his headquarters at Edirne, in addition to the bombards cast on the spot.[45] This train included Orban's enormous cannon, which was said to have been dragged from Edrine by a crew of 60 oxen and over 400 men.[11]:374[21]:77–78 There was another large bombard, independently built by Turkish engineer Saruca, that was also used in the battle.[42][43] Mehmed planned to attack the Theodosian Walls, the intricate series of walls and ditches protecting Constantinople from an attack from the West and the only part of the city not surrounded by water. His army encamped outside the city on 2 April 1453, the Monday after Easter. The bulk of the Ottoman army was encamped south of the Golden Horn. The regular European troops, stretched out along the entire length of the walls, were commanded by Karadja Pasha. The regular troops from Anatolia under Ishak Pasha were stationed south of the Lycus down to the Sea of Marmara. Mehmed himself erected his red-and-gold tent near the Mesoteichion, where the guns and the elite Janissary regiments were positioned. The Bashi-bazouks were spread out behind the front lines. Other troops under Zagan Pasha were employed north of the Golden Horn. Communication was maintained by a road that had been destroyed over the marshy head of the Horn.[21]:94–95 Byzantine dispositions and strategies[edit] Painting of the Fall of Constantinople, by Theophilos Hatzimihail The city had about 20 km of walls (land walls: 5.5 km; sea walls along the Golden Horn: 7 km; sea walls along the Sea of Marmara: 7.5 km), one of the strongest sets of fortified walls in existence. The walls had recently been repaired (under John VIII) and were in fairly good shape, giving the defenders sufficient reason to believe that they could hold out until help from the West arrived.[30]:39 In addition, the defenders were relatively well-equipped with a fleet of 26 ships: 5 from Genoa, 5 from Venice, 3 from Venetian Crete, 1 from Ancona, 1 from Aragon, 1 from France, and about 10 from the empire itself.[30]:45 On 5 April, the Sultan himself arrived with his last troops, and the defenders took up their positions. As Byzantine numbers were insufficient to occupy the walls in their entirety, it had been decided that only the outer walls would be manned. Constantine and his Greek troops guarded the Mesoteichion, the middle section of the land walls, where they were crossed by the river Lycus. This section was considered the weakest spot in the walls and an attack was feared here most. Giustiniani was stationed to the north of the emperor, at the Charisian Gate (Myriandrion); later during the siege, he was shifted to the Mesoteichion to join Constantine, leaving the Myriandrion to the charge of the Bocchiardi brothers. Minotto and his Venetians were stationed in the Blachernae Palace, together with Teodoro Caristo, the Langasco brothers, and Archbishop Leonardo of Chios.[21]:92 To the left of the emperor, further south, were the commanders Cataneo, who led Genoese troops, and Theophilus Palaeologus, who guarded the Pegae Gate with Greek soldiers. The section of the land walls from the Pegae Gate to the Golden Gate (itself guarded by a Genoese called Manuel) was defended by the Venetian Filippo Contarini, while Demetrius Cantacuzenus had taken position on the southernmost part of the Theodosian wall.[21]:92 The sea walls were manned more sparsely, with Jacobo Contarini at Stoudion, a makeshift defence force of Greek monks to his left hand, and Prince Orhan at the Harbour of Eleutherios. Pere Julià was stationed at the Great Palace with Genoese and Catalan troops; Cardinal Isidore of Kiev guarded the tip of the peninsula near the boom. Finally, the sea walls at the southern shore of the Golden Horn were defended by Venetian and Genoese sailors under Gabriele Trevisano.[21]:93 Two tactical reserves were kept behind in the city: one in the Petra district just behind the land walls and one near the Church of the Holy Apostles, under the command of Loukas Notaras and Nicephorus Palaeologus, respectively. The Venetian Alviso Diedo commanded the ships in the harbour.[21]:94 Although the Byzantines also had cannons, the weapons were much smaller than those of the Ottomans, and the recoil tended to damage their own walls.[38] According to David Nicolle, despite many odds, the idea that Constantinople was inevitably doomed is incorrect, and the overall situation was not as one-sided as a simple glance at a map might suggest.[30]:40 It has also been claimed that Constantinople was "the best-defended city in Europe" at that time.[46] Siege[edit] At the beginning of the siege, Mehmed sent out some of his best troops to reduce the remaining Byzantine strongholds outside the city of Constantinople. The fortress of Therapia on the Bosphorus and a smaller castle at the village of Studius near the Sea of Marmara were taken within a few days. The Princes' Islands in the Sea of Marmara were taken by Admiral Baltoghlu's fleet.[21]:96–97 Mehmed's massive cannon fired on the walls for weeks, but due to its imprecision and extremely slow rate of reloading, the Byzantines were able to repair most of the damage after each shot, mitigating the cannon's effect.[11]:376 The Ottoman Turks transport their fleet overland into the Golden Horn. Meanwhile, despite some probing attacks, the Ottoman fleet under Baltoghlu could not enter the Golden Horn due to the chain the Byzantines had previously stretched across the entrance. Although one of the fleet's main tasks was to prevent any foreign ships from entering the Golden Horn, on 20 April, a small flotilla of four Christian ships[note 6] managed to slip in after some heavy fighting, an event which strengthened the morale of the defenders and caused embarrassment to the Sultan.[11]:376 Baltoghlu's life was spared after his subordinates testified to his bravery during the conflict. Mehmed ordered the construction of a road of greased logs across Galata on the north side of the Golden Horn, and dragged his ships over the hill, directly into the Golden Horn on 22 April, bypassing the chain barrier.[11]:376 This action seriously threatened the flow of supplies from Genoese ships from the nominally neutral colony of Pera, and it demoralized the Byzantine defenders. On the night of 28 April, an attempt was made to destroy the Ottoman ships already in the Golden Horn using fire ships, but the Ottomans forced the Christians to retreat with heavy losses. 40 Italians escaped their sinking ships and swam to the northern shore. On orders of Mehmed, they were impaled on stakes, in sight of the city's defenders on the sea walls across the Golden Horn. In retaliation, the defenders brought their Ottoman prisoners, 260 in all, to the walls, where they were executed, one by one, before the eyes of the Ottomans.[21]:108[47] With the failure of their attack on the Ottoman vessels, the defenders were forced to disperse part of their forces to defend the sea walls along the Golden Horn. The Ottoman army had made several frontal assaults on the land wall of Constantinople, but they were always repelled with heavy losses.[48] Venetian surgeon Niccolò Barbaro, describing in his diary one such land attack by the Janissaries, wrote: They found the Turks coming right up under the walls and seeking battle, particularly the Janissaries ... and when one or two of them were killed, at once more Turks came and took away the dead ones ... without caring how near they came to the city walls. Our men shot at them with guns and crossbows, aiming at the Turk who was carrying away his dead countryman, and both of them would fall to the ground dead, and then there came other Turks and took them away, none fearing death, but being willing to let ten of themselves be killed rather than suffer the shame of leaving a single Turkish corpse by the walls.[34] Siege of Constantinople as depicted between 1453 and 1475[49] After these inconclusive frontal offensives, the Ottomans sought to break through the walls by constructing tunnels in an effort to mine them from mid-May to 25 May. Many of the sappers were miners of Serbian origin sent from Novo Brdo[50] and were under the command of Zagan Pasha. However, an engineer named Johannes Grant, a German[note 7] who came with the Genoese contingent, had counter-mines dug, allowing Byzantine troops to enter the mines and kill the workers. The Byzantines intercepted the first tunnel on the night of 16 May. Subsequent tunnels were interrupted on 21, 23, and 25 May, and destroyed with Greek fire and vigorous combat. On 23 May, the Byzantines captured and tortured two Turkish officers, who revealed the location of all the Turkish tunnels, which were subsequently destroyed.[51] On 21 May, Mehmed sent an ambassador to Constantinople and offered to lift the siege if they gave him the city. He promised he would allow the Emperor and any other inhabitants to leave with their possessions. Moreover, he would recognize the Emperor as governor of the Peloponnese. Lastly, he guaranteed the safety of the population that might choose to remain in the city. Constantine XI only agreed to pay higher tributes to the sultan and recognized the status of all the conquered castles and lands in the hands of the Turks as Ottoman possession. However, the Emperor was not willing to leave the city without a fight: As to surrendering the city to you, it is not for me to decide or for anyone else of its citizens; for all of us have reached the mutual decision to die of our own free will, without any regard for our lives.[note 8] Around this time, Mehmed had a final council with his senior officers. Here he encountered some resistance; one of his Viziers, the veteran Halil Pasha, who had always disapproved of Mehmed's plans to conquer the city, now admonished him to abandon the siege in the face of recent adversity. Zagan Pasha argued against Halil Pasha and insisted on an immediate attack. Believing that the beleaguered Byzantine defence was already weakened sufficiently, Mehmed planned to overpower the walls by sheer force and started preparations for a final all-out offensive. Final assault[edit] Painting by the Greek folk painter Theophilos Hatzimihail showing the battle inside the city, Constantine is visible on a white horse Preparations for the final assault began in the evening of 26 May and continued to the next day.[11]:378 For 36 hours after the war council decided to attack, the Ottomans extensively mobilized their manpower in order to prepare for the general offensive.[11]:378 Prayer and resting was then granted to the soldiers on the 28th before the final assault would be launched. On the Byzantine side, a small Venetian fleet of 12 ships, after having searched the Aegean, reached the Capital on 27 May and reported to the Emperor that no large Venetian relief fleet was on its way.[11]:377 On 28 May, as the Ottoman army prepared for the final assault, large-scale religious processions were held in the city. In the evening, a solemn last ceremony was held in the Hagia Sophia, in which the Emperor with representatives and nobility of both the Latin and Greek churches partook.[53]:651–652 Shortly after midnight on 29 May, the all-out offensive began. The Christian troops of the Ottoman Empire attacked first, followed by successive waves of the irregular azaps, who were poorly trained and equipped, and Anatolian Turkmen beylik forces who focused on a section of the damaged Blachernae walls in the north-west part of the city. This section of the walls had been built earlier, in the eleventh century, and was much weaker. The Turkmen mercenaries managed to breach this section of walls and entered the city, but they were just as quickly pushed back by the defenders. Finally, the last wave consisting of elite Janissaries, attacked the city walls. The Genoese general in charge of the land troops,[31][page needed][37][38] Giovanni Giustiniani, was grievously wounded during the attack, and his evacuation from the ramparts caused a panic in the ranks of the defenders.[note 9] With Giustiniani's Genoese troops retreating into the city and towards the harbour, Constantine and his men, now left to their own devices, continued to hold their ground against the Janissaries. However, Constantine's men eventually could not prevent the Ottomans from entering the city, and the defenders were overwhelmed at several points along the wall. When Turkish flags were seen flying above the Kerkoporta, a small postern gate that was left open, panic ensued, and the defence collapsed. Meanwhile, Janissary soldiers, led by Ulubatlı Hasan, pressed forward. Many Greek soldiers ran back home to protect their families, the Venetians retreated to their ships, and a few of the Genoese escaped to Galata. The rest surrendered or committed suicide by jumping off the city walls.[22][page needed] The Greek houses nearest to the walls were the first to suffer from the Ottomans. It is said that Constantine, throwing aside his purple regalia, led the final charge against the incoming Ottomans, perishing in the ensuing battle in the streets alongside his soldiers. On the other hand, the Venetian Nicolò Barbaro wrote in his diary that Constantine hanged himself at the moment when the Turks broke in at the San Romano gate, although his ultimate fate remains unknown.[note 10] After the initial assault, the Ottoman army fanned out along the main thoroughfare of the city, the Mese, past the great forums and the Church of the Holy Apostles, which Mehmed II wanted to provide a seat for his newly appointed patriarch to better control his Christian subjects. Mehmed II had sent an advance guard to protect these key buildings. A small few lucky civilians managed to escape. When the Venetians retreated over to their ships, the Ottomans had already taken the walls of the Golden Horn. Luckily for the occupants of the city, the Ottomans were not interested in killing potentially valuable slaves, but rather in the loot they could get from raiding the city's houses, so they decided to attack the city instead. The Venetian captain ordered his men to break open the gate of the Golden Horn. Having done so, the Venetians left in ships filled with soldiers and refugees. Shortly after the Venetians left, a few Genoese ships and even the Emperor's ships followed them out of the Golden Horn. This fleet narrowly escaped prior to the Ottoman navy assuming control over the Golden Horn, which was accomplished by midday.[22][page needed] The army converged upon the Augusteum, the vast square that fronted the great church of Hagia Sophia whose bronze gates were barred by a huge throng of civilians inside the building, hoping for divine protection. After the doors were breached, the troops separated the congregation according to what price they might bring in the slave markets.[citation needed] Ottoman casualties are unknown but they are believed by most historians to be very heavy due to several unsuccessful Ottoman attacks made during the siege and final assault.[citation needed] The Venetian Barbaro observed that blood flowed in the city "like rainwater in the gutters after a sudden storm" and that bodies of Turks and Christians floated in the sea "like melons along a canal". and that "the Turks made a great slaughter of Christians through the city".[34] Plundering phase[edit] Mehmed II granted his soldiers three days to plunder the city, as he had promised them and in accordance with the custom of the time.[21]:145[55] Soldiers fought over the possession of some of the spoils of war.[56]:283 The women of Constantinople also suffered from rape at the hands of Ottoman forces.[57] According to Barbaro, "all through the day the Turks made a great slaughter of Christians through the city". According to historian Philip Mansel, widespread persecution of the city's civilian inhabitants took place, resulting in thousands of murders and rapes, and 30,000 civilians being enslaved or forcibly deported.[4][58][5][59] George Sphrantzes says that people of both genders were raped inside Hagia Sophia.[59] Loukas Notaras and his son were executed after Notaras refused Mehmed's demand to offer his son for the sultan's pleasure.[59] According to Steven Runciman most of the elderly and the infirm/wounded and sick who were refugees inside the churches were killed, and the remainder (mainly teenage males and young boys) were chained up and sold into slavery.[60] According to the Encyclopædia Britannica Mehmed II "permitted an initial period of looting that saw the destruction of many Orthodox churches", but tried to prevent a complete sack of the city.[61] The looting was extremely thorough in certain parts of the city. On 2 June, the Sultan would find the city largely deserted and half in ruins; churches had been desecrated and stripped, houses were no longer habitable, and stores and shops were emptied. He is famously reported to have been moved to tears by this, saying, "What a city we have given over to plunder and destruction."[21]:152 Looting was carried out by sailors and marines on a massive scale who entered the city via other walls before they had been suppressed by regular troops, which were beyond main gate. According to David Nicolle, the ordinary people were treated better by their Ottoman conquerors than their ancestors had been by Crusaders back in 1204, stating only about 4,000 Greeks died in the siege.[62] Aftermath[edit] On the third day of the conquest, Mehmed II ordered all looting to stop and issued a proclamation that all Christians who had avoided capture or who had been ransomed could return to their homes without further molestation, although many had no homes to return to, and many more had been taken captive and not ransomed.[21]:150–51 Byzantine historian George Sphrantzes, an eyewitness to the fall of Constantinople, described the Sultan's actions:[63][64] On the third day after the fall of our city, the Sultan celebrated his victory with a great, joyful triumph. He issued a proclamation: the citizens of all ages who had managed to escape detection were to leave their hiding places throughout the city and come out into the open, as they were to remain free and no question would be asked. He further declared the restoration of houses and property to those who had abandoned our city before the siege. If they returned home, they would be treated according to their rank and religion, as if nothing had changed. — George Sphrantzes The Hagia Sophia was converted into a mosque, but the Greek Orthodox Church was allowed to remain intact and Gennadius Scholarius was appointed Patriarch of Constantinople. This was once thought to be the origin of the Ottoman millet system; however, it is now considered a myth and no such system existed in the fifteenth century.[65][66] Following the city's conquest, the Church of the Holy Wisdom (the Hagia Sophia) was converted into a mosque. The fall of Constantinople shocked many Europeans, who viewed it as a catastrophic event for their civilization.[67] Many feared other European Christian kingdoms would suffer the same fate as Constantinople. Two possible responses emerged amongst the humanists and churchmen of that era: Crusade or dialogue. Pope Pius II strongly advocated for another Crusade, while the German Nicholas of Cusa supported engaging in a dialogue with the Ottomans.[68] The Morean (Peloponnesian) fortress of Mystras, where Constantine's brothers Thomas and Demetrius ruled, constantly in conflict with each other and knowing that Mehmed would eventually invade them as well, held out until 1460. Long before the fall of Constantinople, Demetrius had fought for the throne with Thomas, Constantine, and their other brothers John and Theodore.[69]:446 Thomas escaped to Rome when the Ottomans invaded Morea while Demetrius expected to rule a puppet state, but instead was imprisoned and remained there for the rest of his life. In Rome, Thomas and his family received some monetary support from the Pope and other Western rulers as Byzantine emperor in exile, until 1503. In 1461 the independent Byzantine state in Trebizond fell to Mehmed.[69]:446 Constantine XI had died without producing an heir, and had Constantinople not fallen he likely would have been succeeded by the sons of his deceased elder brother, who were taken into the palace service of Mehmed after the fall of Constantinople. The oldest boy, renamed to Murad, became a personal favourite of Mehmed and served as Beylerbey (Governor-General) of Rumeli (the Balkans). The younger son, renamed Mesih Pasha, became Admiral of the Ottoman fleet and Sancak Beg (Governor) of the Province of Gallipoli. He eventually served twice as Grand Vizier under Mehmed's son, Bayezid II.[70] With the capture of Constantinople, Mehmed II had acquired the future capital of his kingdom, albeit one in decline due to years of war. The loss of the city was a crippling blow to Christendom, and it exposed the Christian West to a vigorous and aggressive foe in the East. The Christian reconquest of Constantinople remained a goal in Western Europe for many years after its fall to the Ottoman Empire. Rumours of Constantine XI's survival and subsequent rescue by an angel led many to hope that the city would one day return to Christian hands. Pope Nicholas V called for an immediate counter-attack in the form of a crusade,[citation needed] however no European powers wished to participate, and the Pope resorted to sending a small fleet of 10 ships to defend the city. The short lived Crusade immediately came to an end and as Western Europe entered the 16th century, the age of Crusading began to come to an end. For some time Greek scholars had gone to Italian city-states, a cultural exchange begun in 1396 by Coluccio Salutati, chancellor of Florence, who had invited Manuel Chrysoloras, a Byzantine scholar to lecture at the University of Florence.[71] After the conquest many Greeks, such as John Argyropoulos and Constantine Lascaris, fled the city and found refuge in the Latin West, bringing with them knowledge and documents from the Greco-Roman tradition to Italy and other regions that further propelled the Renaissance.[72][73] Those Greeks who stayed behind in Constantinople mostly lived in the Phanar and Galata districts of the city. The Phanariotes, as they were called, provided many capable advisers to the Ottoman rulers. Third Rome[edit] Main article: Third Rome Sultan Mehmed II the Conqueror, by Gentile Bellini Byzantium is a term used by modern historians to refer to the later Roman Empire. In its own time, the Empire ruled from Constantinople (or "New Rome" as some people call it, although this was a laudatory expression that was never an official title) was considered simply as "the Roman Empire." The fall of Constantinople led competing factions to lay claim to being the inheritors of the Imperial mantle. Russian claims to Byzantine heritage clashed with those of the Ottoman Empire's own claim. In Mehmed's view, he was the successor to the Roman Emperor, declaring himself Kayser-i Rum, literally "Caesar of Rome", that is, of the Roman Empire, though he was remembered as "the Conqueror". He founded a political system that survived until 1922 with the establishment of the Republic of Turkey. Stefan Dušan, Tsar of Serbia, and Ivan Alexander, Tsar of Bulgaria, both made similar claims, regarding themselves as legitimate heirs to the Roman Empire. Other potential claimants, such as the Republic of Venice and the Holy Roman Empire have disintegrated into history.[74] Impact on the Churches[edit] Pope Pius II believed that the Ottomans would persecute Greek Orthodox Christians and advocated for another crusade at the Council of Mantua in 1459.[67][75] However, Vlad the Impaler was the only Christian ruler who showed enthusiasm for this suggestion. In 17th-century Russia, the fall of Constantinople had a role in the fierce theological and political controversy between adherents and opponents of the reforms in the Russian Orthodox Church carried out by Patriarch Nikon, which he intended to bring the Russian Church closer to the norms and practices of other Orthodox churches. Avvakum and other "Old Believers" saw these reforms as a corruption of the Russian Church, which they considered to be the "true" Church of God. As the other Churches were more closely related to Constantinople in their liturgies, Avvakum argued that Constantinople fell to the Turks because of these heretical beliefs and practices. The fall of Constantinople has a profound impact on the ancient Pentarchy of the Orthodox Church. Today, the four ancient sees of Jerusalem, Antioch, Alexandria, and Constantinople have relatively few followers and believers locally, because of Islamization and the Dhimma system to which Christians have been subjected since the earliest days of Islam, although migration has created a body of followers in Western Europe and the United States,[citation needed]. As a result of this process, the centre of influence in the Orthodox Church changed and migrated to Eastern Europe (e.g., Russia) rather than remaining in the former Byzantine Near East.[citation needed] Legacy[edit] Prophecies[edit] The Islamic prophet Muhammad prophesied the hadith about the Islamic conquest of Constantinople. Verily you shall conquer Constantinople. What a wonderful leader will he be, and what a wonderful army will that army be!" and "The first army that goes on expedition to Constantinople will be forgiven.[76] Legends[edit] There are many legends in Greece surrounding the Fall of Constantinople. It was said that the partial lunar eclipse that occurred on 22 May 1453 represented a fulfilment of a prophecy of the city's demise.[77] Four days later, the whole city was blotted out by a thick fog, a condition unknown in that part of the world in May. When the fog lifted that evening, a strange light was seen playing about the dome of the Hagia Sophia, which some interpreted as the Holy Spirit departing from the city. "This evidently indicated the departure of the Divine Presence, and its leaving the City in total abandonment and desertion, for the Divinity conceals itself in cloud and appears and again disappears."[19]:59 For others, there was still a distant hope that the lights were the campfires of the troops of John Hunyadi who had come to relieve the city.[note 11] Another legend holds that two priests saying divine liturgy over the crowd disappeared into the cathedral's walls as the first Turkish soldiers entered. According to the legend, the priests will appear again on the day that Constantinople returns to Christian hands.[21]:147 Another legend refers to the Marble Emperor (Constantine XI), holding that an angel rescued the emperor when the Ottomans entered the city, turning him into marble and placing him in a cave under the earth near the Golden Gate, where he waits to be brought to life again (a variant of the sleeping hero legend).[79][80] However many of the myths surrounding the disappearance of the Constantine were developed later and little evidence can be found to support them even in friendly primary accounts of the siege. Cultural impact[edit] Guillaume Dufay composed several songs lamenting the fall of the Eastern church, and the duke of Burgundy, Philip the Good, avowed to take up arms against the Turks. However, as the growing Ottoman power from this date on coincided with the Protestant Reformation and subsequent Counter-Reformation, the recapture of Constantinople became an ever-distant dream. Even France, once a fervent participant in the Crusades, became an ally of the Ottomans. Nonetheless, depictions of Christian coalitions taking the city and of the late Emperor's resurrection by Leo the Wise persisted.[14]:280 29 May 1453, the day of the fall of Constantinople, fell on a Tuesday, and since then Tuesday has been considered an unlucky day by Greeks generally.[81] Impact on the Renaissance[edit] Main article: Greek scholars in the Renaissance The migration waves of Byzantine scholars and émigrés in the period following the sacking of Constantinople and the fall of Constantinople in 1453 is considered by many scholars key to the revival of Greek and Roman studies that led to the development of the Renaissance humanism[73][dead link][better source needed] and science. These émigrés were grammarians, humanists, poets, writers, printers, lecturers, musicians, astronomers, architects, academics, artists, scribes, philosophers, scientists, politicians and theologians.[82][better source needed] They brought to Western Europe the far greater preserved and accumulated knowledge of their own (Greek) civilization. According to the Encyclopædia Britannica: "Many modern scholars also agree that the exodus of Greeks to Italy as a result of this event marked the end of the Middle Ages and the beginning of the Renaissance".[83] Renaming of the city[edit] Ottomans used the Arabic transliteration of the city's name "Qosṭanṭīniyye," (القسطنطينية, more commonly known as "Kostantiniyye"), as can be seen in numerous Ottoman documents. Islambol (اسلامبول, Full of Islam) or Islambul (find Islam) or Islam(b)ol (old Turkic: be Islam), both in Turkish Language, were folk-etymological adaptations of Istanbul created after the Ottoman conquest of 1453 to express the city's new role as the capital of the Islamic Ottoman Empire. It is first attested shortly after the conquest, and its invention was ascribed by some contemporary writers to Mehmed II himself.[84] The name of Istanbul is thought to be derived from the Greek phrase īs tīmbolī(n) (Greek: εἰς τὴν πόλιν, translit. eis tēn pólin, "to the City"), and it is claimed that it had already spread among the Turkish populace of the Ottoman Empire before the conquest. However, Istanbul only became the official name of the city in 1930 by the revised Turkish Postal Law as part of Atatürk's reforms.[85][86][87] In historical fiction[edit] Lew Wallace, The Prince of India; or, Why Constantinople Fell. New York: Harper & Brothers Publishers, 1893. 2 volumes Mika Waltari, The Dark Angel (Original title Johannes Angelos) 1952. Translated from the Finnish by Naomi Walford and pub. in English edition, New York: Putnam, 1953 Peter Sandham, Porphyry and Ash. Hong Kong: Johnston Fleming, 2019 Muharem Bazdulj, The Bridge on Landz from The Second Book, 2000. Translated from Bosnian by Oleg Andric and Andrew Wachtel and pub. in English edition, Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2005 Andrew Novo, Queen of Cities, Seattle: Coffeetown Press, 2009 Jack Hight, Siege. London: John Murray Publisher Ltd, 2010 James Shipman, Constantinopolis, Amazon Digital Services, 2013 C.C. Humphreys, A Place called Armageddon. London: Orion, 2011 Emanuele Rizzardi, L'ultimo Paleologo. PubMe Editore, 2018 John Bellairs, The Trolley to Yesterday Dial, 1989 Kiersten White, "The Conqueror's Saga", 2016 Stefan Zweig, "Die Eroberung von Byzanz (Conquest of Byzantium)" in "Sternstunden der Menschheit (Decisive Moments in History)", 1927 Primary sources[edit] For the fall of Constantinople, Marios Philippides and Walter Hanak list 15 eyewitness accounts (13 Christian and 2 Turkish) and __ contemporary non-eyewitness accounts (13 Italian).[88] Eyewitness accounts[edit] Mehmed Şems el-Mille ve'd Din, Sufi holy man who gives an account in a letter Tursun Beg, wrote a history entitled Tarih-i Abu'l Fath George Sphrantzes, the only Greek eyewitness who wrote about it, but his laconic account is almost entirely lacking in narrative Nicolò Barbaro, physician on a Venetian galley who kept a journal Angelino Giovanni Lomellini, Venetian podestà of Pera who wrote a report dated 24 June 1453 Jacopo Tetaldi, Florentine merchant Leonardo Giustiniani, wrote a report to Pope Nicholas V Isidore of Kiev, Orthodox churchman who wrote eight letters to Italy Benvenuto, Anconitan consul in Constantinople Ubertino Puscolo, Italian poet learning Greek in the city, wrote an epic poem Eparkhos and Diplovatatzes, two refugees whose accounts has become garbled through multiple translations Nestor Iskander, youthful eyewitness who wrote a Slavonic account Samile the Vladik, bishop who, like Eparkhos and Diplovatatzes, fled as a refugee to Wallachia Konstantin Mihailović, Serbian who fought on the Ottoman side a report by some Franciscan prisoners of war who later came to Bologna Non-eyewitness accounts[edit] Doukas, a Byzantine Greek historian, one of the most important sources for the last decades and eventual fall of the Byzantine Empire to the Ottomans Laonikos Chalkokondyles, a Byzantine Greek historian Michael Kritoboulos, a Byzantine Greek historian Makarios Melissourgos, 16th-century historian who augmented the account of Sphrantzes, not very reliably Paolo Dotti, Venetian official on Crete whose account is based on oral reports Fra Girolamo's letter from Crete to Domenico Capranica Lauro Quirini, wrote a report to Pope Nicholas V from Crete based on oral reports Aeneas Silvius Piccolomini (Pope Pius II), wrote an account based on written sources Henry of Soemmern, wrote a letter dated 11 September 1453 in which he cites his sources of information Niccola della Tuccia, whose Cronaca di Viterbo written in the autumn of 1453 contains unique information Niccolò Tignosi da Foligno, Expugnatio Constantinopolitana, part of a letter to a friend Filippo da Rimini, Excidium Constantinopolitanae urbis quae quondam Bizantium ferebatur Antonio Ivani da Sarzana, Expugnatio Constantinopolitana, part of a letter to the duke of Urbino Nikolaos Sekoundinos, read a report before the Venetian Senate, the Pope and the Neapolitan court Giacomo Languschi, whose account is embedded in the Venetian chronicle of Zorzi Dolfin, had access to eyewitnesses John Moskhos, wrote a poem in honour of Loukas Notaras Adamo di Montaldo, De Constantinopolitano excidio ad nobilissimum iuvenem Melladucam Cicadam, which contains unique information Ashikpashazade, included a chapter on the conquest in his Tarih-i al-i Osman[89] Neshri, included a chapter on the conquest in his universal history[89] Evliya Çelebi, 17th-century traveller who collected local traditions of the conquest[89] Notes[edit] ^ "Exaggerated" western estimates ranged between 160,000 and 300,000. ^ While Mehmed II had been steadily preparing for the siege of Constantinople, he had sent the old general Turakhan and the latter's two sons, Ahmed Beg and Omar Beg, to invade the Morea and to remain there all winter also to prevent the despots Thomas and Demetrius from giving aid to Constantine XI.[18]:146 ^ According to Sphrantzes, whom Constantine had ordered to make a census, the Emperor was appalled when the number of native men capable of bearing arms turned out to be only 4,983. Leonardo di Chio gave a number of 6,000 Greeks.[21]:85 ^ The Spanish Cristóbal de Villalón claims there were ' 60,000 Turkish households, 40,000 Greek and Armenian, 10,000 Jewish.[21]:85 ^ Another expert who was employed by the Ottomans was Ciriaco de' Pizzicolli, also known as Ciriaco of Ancona, a traveler and collector of antiquities.[citation needed] ^ These were the three Genoese ships sent by the Pope, joined by a large Imperial transport ship which had been sent on a foraging mission to Sicily previous to the siege and was on its way back to Constantinople.[21]:100 ^ Runciman speculates that he may have been Scottish[21]:84 ^ Original text: Τὸ δὲ τὴν πόλιν σοῖ δοῦναι οὔτ' ἐμὸν ἐστίν οὔτ' ἄλλου τῶν κατοικούντων ἐν ταύτῃ• κοινῇ γὰρ γνώμῃ πάντες αὐτοπροαιρέτως ἀποθανοῦμεν καὶ οὐ φεισόμεθα τῆς ζωῆς ἡμῶν.[52] ^ Sources hostile towards the Genoese (such as the Venetian Nicolò Barbaro), however, report that Longo was only lightly wounded or not wounded at all, but, overwhelmed by fear, simulated the wound to abandon the battlefield, determining the fall of the city. These charges of cowardice and treason were so widespread that the Republic of Genoa had to deny them by sending diplomatic letters to the Chancelleries of England, France, the Duchy of Burgundy and others.[54]:296–297 Giustiniani was carried to Chios, where he succumbed to his wounds a few days later. ^ Barbaro added the description of the emperor's heroic last moments to his diary based on information he received afterward. According to some Ottoman sources Constantine was killed in an accidental encounter with Turkish marines a little further to the south, presumably while making his way to the Sea of Marmara in order to escape by sea.[30][page needed] ^ It is possible that all these phenomena were local effects of the cataclysmic Kuwae volcanic eruption in the Pacific Ocean. The "fire" seen may have been an optical illusion due to the reflection of intensely red twilight glow by clouds of volcanic ash high in the atmosphere.[78] References[edit] ^ "İstanbul'un fethinde 600 Türk askeri, Fatih'e karşı savaştı" [In the Conquest of Istanbul 600 Turkish Military Fought Against the Conqueror]. Osmanlı Arauştırmalarlı (in Turkish). Archived from the original on 15 April 2015. Retrieved 29 April 2015. ^ Nicol, Donald M. (2002). The Immortal Emperor: The Life and Legend of Constantine Palaiologos, Last Emperor of the Romans. Cambridge University Press. p. 57. ISBN 978-0-521-89409-8. Archived from the original on 2 July 2019. Retrieved 9 January 2018. ^ a b Nicolle 2000, p. 41. ^ a b Mansel, Philip. "Constantinople: City of the World's Desire 1453-1924". Washington Post. Archived from the original on 24 July 2019. Retrieved 7 August 2020. ^ a b M.J Akbar (3 May 2002). The Shade of Swords: Jihad and the Conflict Between Islam and Christianity. Routledge. p. 86. ISBN 978-1-134-45259-0. Archived from the original on 12 October 2020. Retrieved 6 August 2020. Some 30,000 Christians were either enslaved or sold. ^ "Σαν σήμερα "έπεσε" η Κωσταντινούπολη". NewsIT. 29 May 2011. ^ Momigliano & Schiavone (1997), Introduction ("La Storia di Roma"), p. XXI ^ Frantzes, Georgios; Melisseidis (Melisseides), Ioannis (Ioannes) A.; Zavolea-Melissidi, Pulcheria (2004). Εάλω η ΠόλιςΤ•ο χρονικό της άλωσης της Κωνσταντινούπολης: Συνοπτική ιστορία των γεγονότων στην Κωνσταντινούπολη κατά την περίοδο 1440 – 1453 [The City has Fallen: Chronicle of the Fall of Constantinople: Concise History of Events in Constantinople in the Period 1440–1453] (in Greek) (5 ed.). Athens: Vergina Asimakopouli Bros. ISBN 9607171918. ^ Foster, Charles (22 September 2006). "The Conquest of Constantinople and the end of empire". Contemporary Review. Archived from the original on 11 June 2009. It is the end of the Middle Ages ) ^ "The fall of Constantinople". The Economist. 23 December 1999. Archived from the original on 18 June 2017. Retrieved 7 June 2017. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o Norwich, John Julius (1997). A Short History of Byzantium. New York: Vintage Books. ^ Madden, Thomas (2005). Crusades: The Illustrated History. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan. ^ Haldon, John (2000). Byzantium at War 600 – 1453. New York: Osprey. ^ a b Mango, Cyril (2002). The Oxford History of Byzantium. New York: Oxford University Press. ^ "The Black Death". Archived from the original on 25 June 2008. Retrieved 13 August 2008.CS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown (link) , Channel 4 – History. ^ Runciman Fall. p. 60 ^ "Bosphorus (i.e. Bosporus), View from Kuleli, Constantinople, Turkey". World Digital Library. 1890–1900. Archived from the original on 20 October 2013. Retrieved 20 October 2013. ^ Setton, Kenneth M. (1978). The Papacy and the Levant (1204–1571): The Fifteenth Century. 2. DJane Publishing. ISBN 0-87169-127-2. ^ a b Kritovoulos, Michael (1954). History of Mehmed the Conqueror. Translated by Riggs, C. T. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN 9780691197906. Archived from the original on 1 August 2020. Retrieved 29 May 2020. ^ Crowley, Roger (2013). 1453: The Holy War for Constantinople and the Clash of Islam and the West. Hachette Books. ISBN 978-1-4013-0558-1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t Runciman, Steven (1965). The Fall of Constantinople, 1453 (Canto ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521398329. ^ a b c d Nicol, Donald M. (1993). The Last Centuries of Byzantium, 1261–1453 (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ^ Frank W. Thackeray; John E. Findling (31 May 2012). Events That Formed the Modern World. ABC-CLIO. p. 213. ISBN 978-1-59884-901-1. Archived from the original on 26 April 2020. Retrieved 13 February 2020. ^ John Julius Norwich (29 October 1998). A Short History of Byzantium. Penguin Books Limited. p. 453. ISBN 978-0-14-192859-3. Archived from the original on 26 April 2020. Retrieved 13 February 2020. Constantine made one last effort: his ambassadors were executed on the spot. ^ Kathie Somerwil-Ayrton (2007). The Train that Disappeared into History: The Berlin-to-Bagdad Railway and how it Led to the Great War. Uitgeverij Aspekt. p. 117. ISBN 978-90-5911-573-6. Archived from the original on 26 April 2020. Retrieved 13 February 2020. The Byzantine emperor, then Constantine XI, sent his ambassadors in an attempt to conciliate: they were executed on ... ^ John Roberts (1973). Civilization: The emergence of man in society. CRM Books. p. 391. It became obvious that Mehmed's messages of peace were false, when he had the Byzantine ambassador executed. ^ Lars Brownworth (15 September 2009). Lost to the West: The Forgotten Byzantine Empire That Rescued Western Civilization. Crown. p. 291. ISBN 978-0-307-46241-1. When Constantine sent emissaries to remind Mehmed that he was breaking his oath and to implore him to at least spare the neighboring villages, Mehmed had the ambassadors executed. ^ Norwich, John Julius (1995). Byzantium: The Decline and Fall v. 3 (First ed.). Penguin Books Ltd. p. 415. ISBN 9780670823772. ^ Michael Spilling, ed., Battles That Changed History: Key Battles That Decided the Fate of Nations ( London, Amber Books Ltd. 2010) p. 187. ^ a b c d e f g h Nicolle, David (2000). Constantinople 1453: The End of Byzantium (Campaign). 78. Oxford: Osprey Publishing. ISBN 1-84176-091-9. ^ a b c d Pertusi, Agostino, ed. (1976). La Caduta di Costantinopoli, I: Le testimonianze dei contemporanei scrittori greci e latini [The Fall of Constantinople, I: The Testimony of the Contemporary Greek and Latin Writers] (in Italian). I. Verona: Fondazione Lorenzo Valla. ^ Lanning, Michael Lee (2005). The Battle 100: The Stories Behind History's Most Influential Battles. Sourcebooks, Inc. ISBN 1-4022-2475-3. ^ İnalcıkt, Halil (2001). Osmanlı İmparatorluğu Klasik Çağ (1300–1600) [The Ottoman Empire, The Classical Age, 1300–1600]. Translated by Itzkouritz, Norman; Imber, Colin. London: Orion. ^ a b c d Nicolò Barbaro, Giornale dell'Assedio di Costantinopoli, 1453. The autograph copy is conserved in the Biblioteca Marciana in Venice. Barbaro's diary has been translated into English by John Melville-Jones (New York: Exposition Press, 1969) ^ a b (in French) Concasty, M.-L., Les "Informations" de Jacques Tedaldi sur le siège et la prise de Constantinople ^ a b Sphrantzes, George. Οικτρός Γεώργιος ο Φραντζής ο και Πρωτοβεσιαρίτης Γρηγόριος τάχα μοναχός ταύτα έγραψεν υπέρ των καθ' αυτών και τινων μερικών γεγονότων εν τώ της αθλίας ζωής αυτε χρόνω [The Pitiful George Frantzes Who was Protovestiaros, Now a Monk, Wrote This for the Βetterment of Others and as Recompense for Some Deeds in His Miserable Life, This Chronicle] (in Greek). ^ a b c Rutheniae, Isidorus (6 July 1453). "Epistola reverendissimi patris domini Isidori cardinalis Ruteni scripta ad reverendissimum dominum Bisarionem episcopum Tusculanum ac cardinalem Nicenum Bononiaeque legatum [Letter of the Most Reverend Lord Father Isidore of Ruthenia, Cardinal, Written to the Most Reverend Lord Bessarion Bishop of Tusculum and Cardinal of Nicaea and Bologna]" (in Latin). Letter to Bisarion. ^ a b c d (in Latin) Leonardo di Chio, Letter to Pope Nicholas V, dated 16 August 1453, edited by J.-P. Migne, Patrologia Graeca, 159, 923A–944B. ^ Leonardo di Chio, Letter,927B: "three hundred thousand and more". ^ Ubertino Pusculo, Constantinopolis, 1464 ^ Leonardo di Chio, Letter, 930C. ^ a b c Steele, Brett D. (2005). The Heirs of Archimedes: Science and the Art of War Through the Age of Enlightenment. MIT Press. p. 106. ISBN 9780262195164. Archived from the original on 22 December 2019. Retrieved 9 September 2019. ^ a b c Hammer, Paul E. J. (2017). Warfare in Early Modern Europe 1450–1660. Routledge. p. 511. ISBN 9781351873765. Archived from the original on 29 December 2019. Retrieved 9 September 2019. ^ Davis, Paul (1999). 100 Decisive Battles. Oxford. p. 166. ISBN 978-0-19-514366-9. ^ Arnold (2001) p. 111 ^ "The fall of Constantinople". The Economist. 23 December 1999. Archived from the original on 4 June 2011. Retrieved 11 December 2010. ^ Crowley (2005), pp. 150–154 ^ Marios Philippides and Walter K. Hanak, The Siege and the Fall of Constantinople in 1453, (Ashgate Publishing, 2011), 520. ^ From Jean Chartier, Chronicle of Charles VII, king of France, MS Bnf Français 2691, f. 246v [1] Archived 17 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine ^ Marios Philippides, Mehmed II the Conqueror and the Fall of the Franco-Byzantine Levant to the Ottoman Turks: Some Western Views and Testimonies, (ACMRS/Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 2007), 83. ^ Crowley, Roger. 1453: the holy war for Constantinople and the clash of Islam and the West. New York: Hyperion, 2005. pp. 168–171. ISBN 1-4013-0850-3. ^ "29 Μαϊου 1453: Όταν "η Πόλις εάλω..." [29 May 1453: When the City Fell...]. iefemerida.com (in Greek). 29 May 2012. Archived from the original on 25 May 2017. Retrieved 5 June 2017. ^ Vasiliev, Alexander (1928). A History of the Byzantine Empire, Vol. II. II. Translated by Ragozin, S. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. ^ Desimoni, C. (1874). Adamo di Montaldo. Atti della Società Ligure di Storia Patria (Proceedings of the Ligurian Society for Homeland History) (in Italian). X. Genoa. ^ Smith, Michael Llewellyn, The Fall of Constantinople, History Makers magazine No. 5, Marshall Cavendish, Sidgwick & Jackson (London). ^ Reinert, Stephen (2002). The Oxford History of Byzantium. New York: Oxford UP. ^ Smith, Cyril J. (1974). "History of Rape and Rape Laws". Women Law Journal. No. 60. p. 188. Archived from the original on 26 April 2020. Retrieved 12 October 2020. ^ Roger Crowley (6 August 2009). Constantinople: The Last Great Siege, 1453. Faber & Faber. p. 226. ISBN 978-0-571-25079-0. The vast majority of the ordinary citizens - about 30,000 - were marched off to the slave markets of Edirne, Bursa and Ankara. ^ a b c Jim Bradbury (1992). The Medieval Siege. Boydell & Brewer. p. 322. ISBN 978-0-85115-312-4. ^ Runciman, Steven (1965). The Fall of Constantinople 1453. Cambridge University Press. p. 147. ISBN 978-0-521-39832-9. Archived from the original on 3 September 2020. Retrieved 23 September 2020. ^ "Fall of Constantinople". Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 19 August 2020. Retrieved 2 August 2020. ^ Nicolle 2000, pp. 81-82. ^ George Sphrantzes. The Fall of the Byzantine Empire: A Chronicle by George Sphrantzes 1401–1477. Translated by Marios Philippides. University of Massachusetts Press, 1980. ISBN 978-0-87023-290-9. ^ Kritovoulos (or Kritoboulos). History of Mehmed the Conqueror. Translated by Charles T. Riggs. Greenwood Press Reprint, 1970. ISBN 978-0-8371-3119-1. ^ Braude, Benjamin (1982). "Foundation Myths of the Millet System". In Braude, Benjamin; Lewis, Bernard (eds.). Christians and Jews in the Ottoman Empire. 1. New York: Holmes & Meier. pp. 69–90. ISBN 0841905193. ^ Masters, Bruce (2009). "Millet". In Ágoston, Gábor; Bruce Masters (eds.). Encyclopedia of the Ottoman Empire. pp. 383–384. ^ a b Hyslop, Stephen Garrison; Daniels, Patricia; Society (U.S.), National Geographic (2011). Great Empires: An Illustrated Atlas. National Geographic Books. p. 284. ISBN 978-1-4262-0829-4. Archived from the original on 1 August 2020. Retrieved 2 June 2020. ^ Volf, Miroslav (2010). "Body counts: the dark side of Christian history". The Christian Century. 127 (Journal Article): 11–. ISSN 0009-5281. Archived from the original on 27 July 2020. Retrieved 27 July 2020. ^ a b Norwich, John Julius (1995). Byzantium: The Decline and Fall. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. ISBN 0-679-41650-1. ^ Lowry, Heath W. (2003). The Nature of the Early Ottoman State. Albany, NY: SUNY Press. pp. 115–116. ^ N. G. Wilson, From Byzantium to Italy. Greek Studies in the Italian Renaissance, London, 1992. ISBN 0-7156-2418-0 ^ "John Argyropoulos". britannica.com. Archived from the original on 26 April 2008. Retrieved 2 October 2009. ^ a b "Byzantines in Renaissance Italy". Archived from the original on 30 September 2003. Retrieved 10 April 2007. ^ "Saving the Third Rome. "Fall of the Empire", Byzantium and Putin's Russia". IWM. 9 November 2009. Archived from the original on 27 July 2014. Retrieved 13 February 2016. ^ Florescu, McNally, Dracula, p. 129 ^ Mucahit Turetken (29 May 2015). "The conquest of Constantinople: The heralding in a new era". Anadolu Agency. The Prophet Muhammad's well-known hadiths (prophetic tradition) symbolize this ideal: "Verily you shall conquer Constantinople. What a wonderful leader will he be, and what a wonderful army will that army be!" and "The first army that goes on expedition to Constantinople will be forgiven." ^ Guillermier, Pierre; Koutchmy, Serge (1999). Total Eclipses: Science, Observations, Myths, and Legends. Springer. p. 85. ISBN 1-85233-160-7. Retrieved 27 February 2008. ^ "#1543" (Press release). Pasadena, California: Public Information Office, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, National Aeronautics & Space Administration (NASA). 1993. Archived from the original on 14 December 2016. Retrieved 5 June 2017. ^ The Marble King(in Greek) Archived 13 December 2012 at the Wayback Machine ^ Hatzopoulos, Dionysios. "Fall of Constantinople, 1453". Hellenic Electronic Center. Archived from the original on 4 March 2009. Retrieved 25 July 2014. ^ "The fall of Constantinople". The Economist. 23 December 1999. Archived from the original on 6 March 2019. Retrieved 27 January 2019. ^ Greeks in Italy Archived 7 June 2013 at the Wayback Machine ^ "Fall of Constantinople". Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 19 August 2020. Retrieved 2 August 2020. ^ Sakaoğlu, Necdet (1993–94). "İstanbul'un adları" [The names of Istanbul]. Dünden bugüne İstanbul ansiklopedisi (in Turkish). Istanbul: Türkiye Kültür Bakanlığı. ^ Robinson, Richard D. (1965). The First Turkish Republic: A Case Study in National Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ^ Room, Adrian, (1993), Place Name changes 1900–1991, (Metuchen, N.J., & London:The Scarecrow Press, Inc.), ISBN 0-8108-2600-3 pp. 46, 86. ^ "Timeline: Turkey". BBC News. 10 December 2009. Archived from the original on 4 June 2010. Retrieved 18 January 2010. ^ Marios Philippides and Walter K. Hanak, The Siege and the Fall of Constantinople in 1453: Historiography, Topography, and Military Studies (Ashgate, 2011), pp. 10–46 (eyewitnesses), 46 (Greeks) and 88–91 (Turks). ^ a b c Michael Angold, The Fall of Constantinople to the Ottomans: Context and Consequences (Routledge, 2012), pp. 150–152, 163. Further reading[edit] Babinger, Franz (1992): Mehmed the Conqueror and His Time. Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-01078-1 Crowley, Roger (2005): 1453: The Holy War for Constantinople and the Clash of Islam and the West. Hyperion. ISBN 978-1-4013-0558-1 Fletcher, Richard A.: The Cross and the Crescent (2005) Penguin Group ISBN 0-14-303481-2 Harris, Jonathan (2007): Constantinople: Capital of Byzantium. Hambledon/Continuum. ISBN 978-1-84725-179-4 Harris, Jonathan (2010): The End of Byzantium. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-11786-8 Melville Jones, John, The Siege of Constantinople 1453: Seven Contemporary Accounts, Amsterdam 1972 Momigliano, Arnaldo; Schiavone, Aldo (1997). Storia di Roma, 1 (in Italian). Turin: Einaudi. ISBN 88-06-11396-8. Murr Nehme, Lina (2003). 1453: The Conquest of Constantinople. Aleph Et Taw. ISBN 2-86839-816-2. Pertusi, Agostino, ed. (1976). La Caduta di Costantinopoli, II: L'eco nel mondo [The Fall of Constantinople, II: The Echo in the World] (in Italian). II. Verona: Fondazione Lorenzo Valla. Philippides, Marios and Walter K. Hanak, The Siege and the Fall of Constantinople in 1453, Ashgate, Farnham and Burlington 2011. Smith, Michael Llewellyn, "The Fall of Constantinople", in History Makers magazine No. 5 (London, Marshall Cavendish, Sidgwick & Jackson, 1969) p. 192. Wheatcroft, Andrew (2003): The Infidels: The Conflict Between Christendom and Islam, 638–2002. Viking Publishing ISBN 0-670-86942-2 Wintle, Justin (2003): The Rough Guide History of Islam. Rough Guides. ISBN 1-84353-018-X External links[edit] Library resources about Fall of Constantinople Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries Wikimedia Commons has media related to Fall of Constantinople (1453). The Siege of Constantinople As The Islamic World Sees it Ancient History Encyclopedia – 1453: The Fall of Constantinople Constantinople Siege & Fall, BBC Radio 4 discussion with Roger Crowley, Judith Herrin & Colin Imber (In Our Time, 28 Dec. 2006) v t e Byzantine Empire topics History Preceding Roman Empire Dominate Early (330–717) Constantinian–Valentinianic era Constantinian dynasty Valentinianic dynasty Theodosian era Leonid era Justinian era Heraclian era "Byzantine Dark Ages" Twenty Years' Anarchy Middle (717–1204) Isaurian era Nikephorian era Amorian era Macedonian era Doukid era Komnenian era Angelid era Late (1204–1453) Sack of Constantinople Fourth Crusade Frankokratia Latin Empire Byzantine successor states (Nicaea / Epirus–Thessalonica / Morea / Trebizond) Palaiologan era Decline of the Byzantine Empire Fall of Constantinople By modern region or territory Albania Anatolia Armenia Bulgaria Corsica Crete Cyprus Dalmatia Egypt Greece Italy Sardinia Sicily Maghreb Malta Serbia Spain (Iberian Peninsula and Balearic Islands) Syria Thrace Governance Central Emperors Family tree Imperial bureaucracy Medieval Greek Senate Early Praetorian prefects Magister officiorum Comes sacrarum largitionum Comes rerum privatarum Quaestor sacri palatii Middle Logothetes tou dromou Sakellarios Logothetes tou genikou Logothetes tou stratiotikou Chartoularios tou sakelliou Chartoularios tou vestiariou Epi tou eidikou Protasekretis Epi ton deeseon Late Megas logothetes Mesazon Provincial Early Praetorian prefectures Dioceses Provinces Quaestura exercitus Exarchate of Ravenna Exarchate of Africa Middle Themata Kleisourai Bandon Catepanates Late Kephale Despotates Diplomacy Treaties Diplomats Roman–Iranian relations Military Army Battle tactics Battles Generals Mercenaries Military manuals Military units Revolts Wars Early Late Roman army East Roman army Foederati Bucellarii Scholae Palatinae Excubitors Middle Themata Kleisourai Tourma Droungos Bandon Tagmata Domestic of the Schools Hetaireia Akritai Varangian Guard Late Komnenian army Pronoia Vestiaritai Palaiologan army Allagion Paramonai Grand domestic Navy Karabisianoi Maritime themata Cibyrrhaeot Aegean Sea Samos Dromon Greek fire Droungarios of the Fleet Megas doux Admirals Naval battles Religion and law Religion Eastern Orthodoxy Byzantine Rite Hesychasm Patriarchate of Constantinople Saints Oriental Orthodoxy Alexandrian Rite Armenian Rite West Syriac Rite Miaphysitism Ecumenical councils Arianism Monophysitism Paulicianism Iconoclasm Great Schism Bogomilism Mount Athos Missionary activity Bulgaria Moravia Serbs Kievan Rus' Jews Law Codex Theodosianus Corpus Juris Civilis Code of Justinian Ecloga Basilika Hexabiblos Mutilation Culture and society Architecture Secular Sacred Cross-in-square Domes Constantinople Basilica Cistern Baths of Zeuxippus Blachernae Palace Chora Church City Walls Great Palace of Constantinople Hagia Irene Hagia Sophia Hippodrome Pammakaristos Church Prison of Anemas Thessalonica Arch of Galerius and Rotunda Byzantine Bath Hagia Sophia Hagios Demetrios Panagia Chalkeon Walls of Thessaloniki Ravenna San Vitale Sant'Apollinare in Classe Sant'Apollinare Nuovo Other locations Daphni Monastery Hosios Loukas Nea Moni of Chios Panagia Gorgoepikoos Saint Catherine's Monastery Mystras Art Icons Enamel Glass Mosaics Early Byzantine mosaics Painters Macedonian period art Komnenian renaissance Economy Agriculture Coinage Mints Trade silk Silk Road Varangians Dynatoi Literature Novel Acritic songs Digenes Akritas Alexander Romance Historians Everyday life Calendar Cities Cuisine Dance Dress Flags and insignia Gardens Music Lyra Octoechos People Byzantine Greeks Women Slavery Units of measurement Science Learning Encyclopedias Imperial Library Inventions Medicine Philosophy Rhetoric Scholars University University of Constantinople Impact Byzantine commonwealth Byzantine studies Museums Byzantinism Cyrillic script Neo-Byzantine architecture Greek scholars in the Renaissance Third Rome Megali Idea Byzantine Empire portal v t e Major sieges involving the Ottoman Empire by century 13th-14th 1285 Kulaca Hisar 1326 Bursa 1328–1331 Nicaea 1333–1337 Nicomedia 1360s Adrianople 1385 Sofia 1393 Tarnovo 1394–1402 Constantinople 15th 1411 Constantinople 1422 Constantinople 1422–1430 Thessalonica 1428 Golubac 1440 Belgrade 1440–41 Novo Brdo 1448 Svetigrad 1450 Krujë 1453 Constantinople 1455 Berat 1456 Belgrade 1461 Trebizond 1462 Mytilene 1463 Jajce 1464 Jajce 1467 Krujë 1470 Negroponte 1474 Scutari 1477–78 Krujë 1478–79 Scutari 1480 Rhodes 1481 Otranto 16th 1500 Cephalonia 1517 Cairo 1521 Belgrade 1522 Knin 1522 Rhodes 1529 Peñón of Algiers 1529 Vienna 1531 Diu 1532 Güns (Kőszeg) 1532 Maribor 1533–34 Coron 1534 Tunis 1534 Baghdad 1537 Klis 1537 Corfu 1538 Diu 1539 Castelnuovo 1541 Buda 1543 Nice 1543 Esztergom 1548 Aden 1548 Van 1551 Tripoli 1552 Muscat 1552 Hormuz 1552 Temesvár 1552 Eger 1556 Oran 1559 Bahrain 1563 Oran 1565 Malta 1566 Szigetvar 1570–71 Famagusta 1574 Tunis 1578 Gvozdansko 1592 Bihać 1593 Sisak 1596 Eger 17th 1601 Nagykanizsa 1621 Khotyn 1638 Baghdad 1663 Uyvar 1664 Novi Zrin 1648–1669 Candia 1672 Kamenets 1683 Vienna 1684 Buda 1684 Santa Maura 1685 Érsekújvár 1686 Buda 1686 Pécs 1688 Negroponte 1688 Belgrade 1690 Belgrade 1695 Azov 1696 Azov 18th 1711 Brăila 1715 Nauplia 1716 Corfu 1716 Temeşvar 1717 Belgrade 1733 Baghdad 1734–35 Ganja 1737 Ochakov 1739 Belgrade 1788 Ochakov 1788 Khotin 1789 Belgrade 1789 Izmail 1799 El Arish 1799 Jaffa 1799 Acre 19th 1801 Cairo 1806 Belgrade 1821 Patras 1821–22 Acropolis 1821 Tripolitsa 1822 Missolonghi 1823 Missolonghi 1825–26 Missolonghi 1826–27 Acropolis 1828 Kars 1828 Varna 1854 Calafat 1854 Silistra 1854–55 Sevastopol 1855 Kars 1877 Plevna 20th 1912–13 Scutari 1912–13 Adrianople 1915 Van 1915–16 Kut 1916–1919 Medina Ottoman defeats shown in italics. Authority control GND: 4128316-8 LCCN: sh85068752 NKC: ph311315 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fall_of_Constantinople&oldid=996324194" Categories: Fall of Constantinople 1453 in the Ottoman Empire 1450s in the Byzantine Empire Battles of the Byzantine–Ottoman wars Conflicts in 1453 East–West Schism Sieges involving the Byzantine Empire Sieges involving the Ottoman Empire Sieges of Constantinople Battles of Mehmed the Conqueror 15th century in Istanbul Massacres in the Byzantine Empire Last stands Looting Massacres committed by the Ottoman Empire Hidden categories: All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from June 2017 Wikipedia articles needing page number citations from June 2017 CS1 Turkish-language sources (tr) CS1 uses Greek-language script (el) CS1 Greek-language sources (el) CS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown CS1 Italian-language sources (it) Articles with French-language sources (fr) CS1 Latin-language sources (la) Articles with Latin-language sources (la) Webarchive template wayback links Articles with Greek-language sources (el) CS1: abbreviated year range Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata Use dmy dates from May 2020 Coordinates on Wikidata Articles containing Byzantine Greek-language text Articles containing Turkish-language text Wikipedia articles needing page number citations from May 2020 Articles with unsourced statements from May 2020 Articles with unsourced statements from February 2020 Articles with unsourced statements from May 2017 Articles with unsourced statements from January 2020 All articles with dead external links Articles with dead external links from November 2016 All articles lacking reliable references Articles lacking reliable references from November 2016 Articles containing Ottoman Turkish (1500-1928)-language text Articles containing Greek-language text Commons category link from Wikidata Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Languages Alemannisch العربية Asturianu Azərbaycanca تۆرکجه বাংলা Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ Български Bosanski Brezhoneg Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français Frysk Galego 한국어 Հայերեն हिन्दी Hrvatski Bahasa Indonesia Italiano עברית ქართული Latina Latviešu Lietuvių Lumbaart Magyar Македонски മലയാളം مصرى Bahasa Melayu Монгол Nederlands 日本語 Occitan Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча ਪੰਜਾਬੀ پنجابی Polski Português Română Русский Sardu Simple English Slovenčina Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska தமிழ் ไทย Türkçe Українська اردو Tiếng Việt 吴语 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 25 December 2020, at 22:22 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2320 ---- Marcellus Empiricus - Wikipedia Marcellus Empiricus From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Marcellus Empiricus, also known as Marcellus Burdigalensis (“Marcellus of Bordeaux”), was a Latin medical writer from Gaul at the turn of the 4th and 5th centuries. His only extant work is the De medicamentis, a compendium of pharmacological preparations drawing on the work of multiple medical and scientific writers as well as on folk remedies and magic. It is a significant if quirky text in the history of European medical writing, an infrequent subject of monographs, but regularly mined as a source for magic charms, Celtic herbology and lore, and the linguistic study of Gaulish and Vulgar Latin.[1] Bonus auctor est (“he’s a good authority”) was the judgment of J.J. Scaliger,[2] while the science historian George Sarton called the De medicamentis an “extraordinary mixture of traditional knowledge, popular (Celtic) medicine, and rank superstition.”[3] Marcellus is usually identified with the magister officiorum of that name who held office during the reign of Theodosius I. Contents 1 Life and political career 2 Medical background 3 Religious background 3.1 Christian benefactor? 4 The Book of Medicaments 5 Significance as medical writer 6 Therapeutic system 7 The text 8 References Life and political career[edit] Little is known of the life of Marcellus. The primary sources are: Marcellus’s own preface to the De medicamentis; the Codex Theodosianus (probably referring to this Marcellus); a letter written in 399 by Symmachus to a Marcellus who is likely to have been the medical writer; a letter written by the Antiochan scholar Libanius that mentions a Marcellus; an inscription in Narbonne (his association with which would require that he not be from Bordeaux; see below); an anecdote in Orosius about an unnamed Gaul (also a highly conjectural link). The Gallic origin of Marcellus is rarely disputed, and he is traditionally identified with the toponym Burdigalensis; that is, from Bordeaux (Latin Burdigala), within the Roman province of Aquitania. In his prefatory epistle, he refers to three Bordelaise praetorian prefects as his countrymen: Siburius, Eutropius, and Julius Ausonius, the father of the poet Decimus Magnus Ausonius.[4] He is sometimes thought to have come from Narbonne rather than Bordeaux.[5] There has been an attempt to make a Spanish senator of him on the basis of Symmachus's reference to property he owned in Spain; but this inference ignores that Marcellus is said explicitly to have left Spain to return to living in avitis penatibus, or among the household spirits of his grandfathers — that is, at home as distinguished from Spain. He probably wrote the De medicamentis liber during his retirement there.[6] Numismatic image of Theodosius I The author of the De medicamentis is most likely the Marcellus who was appointed magister officiorum by Theodosius I. The heading of the prefatory epistle identifies him as a vir inlustris, translatable as “a distinguished man,” but a more formal designation of rank that indicates he had held imperial office. Marcellus's 16th-century editor Janus Cornarius gives the unhelpful phrase ex magno officio (something like “from high office”); coupled with two references in the Theodosian Code to a Marcellus as magister officiorum,[7] Cornarius's phrase has been taken as a mistaken expansion of the standard abbreviation mag. off. The magister officiorum was a sort of Minister of the Interior[8] and the identification is consistent with what is known of the author's life and with the politics of the time.[9] His stated connection to the Ausonii makes it likely that he was among the several aristocratic Gauls who benefitted politically when the emperor Gratian appointed his Bordelaise tutor Ausonius to high office and from Theodosius's extended residence in the western empire during the latter years of his reign.[10] Marcellus would have entered his office sometime after April 394 A.D., when his predecessor is last attested,[11] and before the emperor's death on January 17, 395. He was replaced in late November or December of 395, as determined by the last reference to a Marcellus holding office that is dated November 24 and by the dating of a successor.[12] The timing of his departure suggests that he had been a supporter of Rufinus, the calculating politician of Gallic origin who was assassinated November 27 of that year, having failed to resist if not facilitating the advance of Alaric and the Visigoths. Marcellus's support may have been pragmatic or superficial; a source that condemns Rufinus heartily praises Marcellus as “the very soul of excellence.”[13] Given Rufinus's dealings with the Visigoths, however, it is conceivable that Marcellus should be identified with “a certain former high-ranking official from Narbonne” mentioned by Orosius[14] as present in Bethlehem in 415 A.D. While visiting Jerome, Orosius says he heard this Gaul relate the declaration made by Athaulf, king of the Visigoths, at Narbonne regarding his intentions toward the Roman empire.[15] John Matthews argued that Marcellus, who would have been about 60 at the time, is “clearly the most eligible candidate.”[16] Since Orosius identifies the Gaul only as having served under Theodosius, and as a “devout, cautious, and serious” person, other figures have been put forth as the likely bearer of the Athaulf declaration.[17] Medical background[edit] It is not unreasonable but also not necessary to conclude that Marcellus was a practicing physician. In his dissertation, the intellectual historian of magic and medicine Lynn Thorndike pronounced him the “court physician” of Theodosius I,[18] but the evidence is thin: Libanius, if referring to this Marcellus, praises his ability to cure a headache.[19] The prevailing view is that Marcellus should be categorized as a medical writer and not a physician.[20] A translator of the medical writings of Isidore of Seville characterizes Marcellus as a “medical amateur” and dismisses the De medicamentis as “nothing more than the usual ancient home remedies,”[21] and the historian of botany Ernst Meyer seems to have considered him a dilettante.[22] Like Ausonius and later Sidonius Apollinaris, Marcellus is among those aristocratic Gauls of the 4th and 5th centuries who were nominally or even devoutly Christian but who fashioned themselves after the Republican ideal of the Roman noble: a career in politics balanced with country villas and informational or literary writing on a range of subjects, including philosophy, astronomy, agriculture, and the natural sciences.[23] Although medical writing might have been regarded as a lesser achievement, it was a resource for the pater familias who traditionally took personal responsibility for the health care of his household, both family members and slaves.[24] Prescriptions for veterinary treatments dispersed throughout the De medicamentis also suggest the interests and concerns of the author — the letter from Symmachus serves mainly to inquire whether Marcellus can provide thoroughbred horses for games to be sponsored by his son, who has been elected praetor — and of his intended audience, either the owners of estates or the literate workers who managed them.[25] “Do-it-yourself” manuals were popular among the landowning elite because they offered, as Marcellus promises, a form of self-sufficiency and mastery.[26] Alf Önnerfors has argued that a personal element distinguishes the De medicamentis from similar medical manuals, which are in effect if not fact anonymous. In the letter to his sons, whom he addresses as dulcissimi (“my sweetest”), Marcellus expresses the hope that they and their families will, in case of sickness, find support and remedies in their father's manual, without intervention by doctors (sine medicis intercessione). This emphasis on self-reliance, however, is not meant to exclude others, but to empower oneself to help others; appealing to divina misericordia (“godlike compassion”), Marcellus urges his sons to extend caritas (“caring” or perhaps Christian “charity”) to strangers and the poor as well as to their loved ones.[27] The tone, Önnerfors concludes, is “humane and full of gentle humor.”[28] Religious background[edit] Marcellus is usually regarded as a Christian,[29] but he also embraces magico-medical practices that draw on the traditional religions of antiquity. Historian of botanical pharmacology Jerry Stannard believed that evidence in the De medicamentis could neither prove nor disprove Marcellus's religious identity, noting that the few references to Christianity are “commonplace” and that, conversely, charms with references to Hellenistic magic occur widely in medieval Christian texts.[30] In his classic study The Cult of the Saints, Peter Brown describes and sets out to explain what he sees as “the exclusively pagan tone of a book whose author was possibly a Christian writing for a largely Christianized upper class.”[31] Historians of ancient medicine Carmélia Opsomer and Robert Halleux note that in his preface, Marcellus infuses Christian concerns into the ancient tradition of “doctoring without doctors.”[32] That Marcellus was at least a nominal Christian is suggested by his appointment to high office by Theodosius I, who exerted his will to Christianize the empire by ordering the Roman senate to convert en masse.[33] The Celtic god Esus (Aisus) The internal evidence of religion in the text is meager. The phrase divina misericordia in the preface appears also in St. Augustine’s De civitate Dei, where the reference to divine mercy follows immediately after a passage on barbarian incursions.[34] Marcellus and Augustine are contemporaries, and the use of the phrase is less a question of influence than of the currency of a shared Christian concept.[35] Elsewhere, passages sometimes cited as evidence of Christianity[36] on closer inspection only display the syncretism of the Hellenistic magico-religious tradition, as Stannard noted. Christ, for instance, is invoked in an herb-gathering incantation,[37] but the ritual makes use of magico-medical practices of pre-Christian antiquity. A Judaeo-Christian reference — nomine domini Iacob, in nomine domini Sabaoth[38] — appears as part of a magic charm that the practitioner is instructed to inscribe on a lamella, or metal leaf. Such “magic words” often include nonsense syllables and more-or-less corrupt phrases from “exotic” languages such as Celtic, Aramaic, Coptic, and Hebrew, and are not indications of formal adherence to a religion.[39] The first reference to any religious figure in the text is Asclepius, the premier god of healing among the Greeks. Marcellus alludes to a Roman version of the myth in which Asclepius restores the dismembered Virbius to wholeness; as a writer, Marcellus says, he follows a similar course of gathering the disiecta … membra ("scattered body parts") of his sources into one corpus (whole body).[40] In addition to gods from the Greco-Roman pantheon, one charm deciphered as a Gaulish passage has been translated to invoke the Celtic god Aisus, or Esus as it is more commonly spelled, for his aid in dispelling throat trouble.[41] Christian benefactor?[edit] An inscription[42] dated 445 recognizes a Marcellus as the most important financial supporter in the rebuilding of the cathedral at Narbonne, carried out during the bishopric of St. Rusticus. John Matthews has argued that this Marcellus is likely to have been a son or near descendant of the medical writer, since the family of an inlustris is most likely to have possessed the wealth for such a generous contribution.[43] The donor had served for two years as praetorian prefect of Gaul. Assuming that the man would have been a native, Matthews weighs this piece of evidence with the Athaulf anecdote from Orosius to situate the author of the De medicamentis in the Narbonensis,[44] but this is a minority view. The Book of Medicaments[edit] Marcellus begins the De medicamentis liber by acknowledging his models. The texts he draws on include the so-called Medicina Plinii or “Medical Pliny,” the herbal (Herbarius) of Pseudo-Apuleius, and the pharmacological treatise of Scribonius Largus, as well as the most famous Latin encyclopedia from antiquity, the Historia naturalis of Pliny the Elder.[45] The work is structured as follows: Epistolary dedication, addressed to Marcellus's sons, a prose preface equivalent to seven paragraphs. Index medicalium scriptorum, or table of contents for the medical topics, listing the 36 chapter headings. A short tract on metrology,[46] with notes in Latin on units of measure and a conversion chart in Greek. Epistulae diversorum de qualitate et observatione medicinae (“Letters by various authors on ‘quality’ and ‘observation’ in medicine”), a series of seven epistles, each attributed to a different medical writer. The epistles serve as a literary device for discussing methodology, diagnosis, and the importance of ethical and accurate treatment.[47] They are not, or not wholly, fictional; just as Marcellus's work begins with a prefatory epistle addressed to his sons, the seven letters represent prefaces to other authors’ works, some now lost. Marcellus has detached them from the works they headed and presented them collectively, translating, sometimes taking liberties, those originally in Greek, as a kind of bonus for his sons.[48] For instance, the “Letter from Celsus”, addressed to a Callistus, deals with the physician's ethical duty in relation to the Hippocratic Oath.[49] Ferula gummosa, source of the ingredient galbanum Thirty-six chapters on treatments, consisting mainly of recipes both pharmacological and magical, and arranged by convention anatomically a capite ad calcem (“from head to toe,” in the equivalent English expression) as were Marcellus's sources Scribonius Largus and the Medicina Plinii.[50] The treatment chapters run to 255 pages in Niedermann's edition. Meyer lists 262 different plant names in Marcellus; allowing for synonyms, of which there are many, the number of plants mentioned would be around 131.[51] About 25 of the botanicals most frequently prescribed are “exotica”’ such as galbanum, sagapenum, and ginger; these may have been available in Gaul as imports, but only to elite consumers. Other ingredients likely to have been rare for Marcellus’s intended audience include cinnamon, cloves, candied tragacanth, Alexandrian niter, and African snails, perhaps the Giant African land snail, which are prescribed live for pulping into a mélange. Availability is possibly a lesser criterion of selection for Marcellus than completeness and variety of interest.[52] And last, the Carmen de speciebus (“Song of Species”), a 78-line Latin hexameter poem on pharmacology, which Marcellus contrasts to his prose assemblage of prescriptions by asserting his originality in writing it.[53] Significance as medical writer[edit] Marcellus was a transitional figure between ancient and medieval materia medica. Although the contents of the recipes — their names, uses, and methods of treatment — derive from the medical texts of ancient Greece and Rome, the book also points forward to doctrines and approaches characteristic of medieval medicine. Marcellus is seldom cited directly, but his influence, though perhaps not wide or pervasive, can be traced in several medieval medical texts.[54] A major change in the approach to writing about botanical pharmacology is signalled in the De Medicamentis. As texts associated with Mediterranean medicine traveled west and north with the expanding borders of the Roman empire, the plants required by drug recipes were no longer familiar, and the descriptions or illustrations provided by earlier herbals failed to correspond to indigenous flora. Marcellus's practice of offering synonyms is one attempt to bridge this gap. He often provides a string of correspondences: the Greek plant name polygonos is first glossed as sanguinaria in Latin (1.2),[55] then as "what we [in Gaul?] call rubia" (1.44); in the same chapter polygonos is given as another name for millefolium (1.28), and identified elsewhere as equivalent to verbena (10.5). Of the dozen or so Celtic plant names, ten are provided with or as synonyms for Greek or Latin names. A preoccupation with naming rather than description is a characteristic also of medieval herbals.[56] The problems of identifying plants may have been an intellectual attraction for Marcellus's Renaissance editor Cornarius, whose botanical work emphasized the value of words over illustration.[57] Another medieval emphasis foreshadowed in Marcellus is a concern for locating ingredients in their native environment, replacing the exotic flora and fauna prescribed in texts from antiquity with indigenous species. Recipes in both Marcellus and the medieval writers tend toward “polypharmacy,” or the use of a great number of ingredients in a single preparation. Many recipes in De medicamentis contain at least ten ingredients, and one, the antidotus Cosmiana (29.11), is compounded of 73.[58] Marcellus is one of the likely sources for Anglo-Saxon leechcraft,[59] or at least drew on the shared European magico-medical tradition that also produced runic healing: a 13th-century wooden amulet from Bergen is inscribed with a charm in runes that resembles Marcellus's Aisus charm.[60] Therapeutic system[edit] Reliquary of St. Martin of Tours In The Cult of the Saints, Peter Brown contrasts the “horizontal” or environmental healing prescribed by Marcellus to the “vertical,” authoritarian healing of his countryman and contemporary St. Martin of Tours, known for miracle cures and especially exorcism. Since magic for medical purposes can be considered a form of faith healing, that is also not a distinction between the two; “rich layers of folklore and superstition,” writes Brown, “lie beneath the thin veneer of Hippocratic empiricism” in Marcellus.[61] Nor does the difference lie in the social class of the intended beneficiaries, for both therapeutic systems encompassed “country folk and the common people”[62] as well as senatorial landowners. At the Christian shrines, however, healing required submission to “socially chartered” authority;[63] in Marcellus, the patient or practitioner, often addressed directly as “you,” becomes the agent of his own cure.[64] While the power of a saint to offer a cure resided within a particular shrine which the patient must visit, health for Marcellus lay in the interconnectivity of the patient with his environment, the use he actively made of herbs, animals, minerals, dung, language, and transformative processes such as emulsification, calcination and fermentation. In the prefatory epistle, Marcellus insists on the efficacy of remedia fortuita atque simplicia (remedies that are readily available and act directly), despite the many recipes involving more than a dozen ingredients; in the concluding Carmen, he celebrates ingredients from the far reaches of the empire and the known world (lines 41–67), emphasizing that the Roman practitioner has access to a “global” marketplace.[65] The text[edit] Janus Cornarius: Marcelli ... de medicamentis empiricis, physicis ac rationabilibus Liber. Froben, Basel 1536 (Digitalisat) The standard text is that of Maximillian Niedermann, Marcelli de medicamentis liber, vol. 5 of the Teubner Corpus Medicorum Latinorum (Leipzig, 1916). The previous Teubner edition had been edited by Georg Helmreich in 1889. References[edit] ^ Carmélia Opsomer and Robert Halleux, “Marcellus ou le mythe empirique,” in Les écoles médicales à Rome. Actes du 2ème Colloque international sur les textes médicaux latins antiques, Lausanne, septembre 1986, edited by Philippe Mudry and Jackie Pigeaud (Geneva: Librairie Droz, 1991), p. 160. ^ In the Prima Scaligerana of 1740, cited by George W. Robinson, “Joseph Scaliger’s Estimates of Greek and Latin Authors,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 29 (1918) p. 160. ^ George Sarton, Introduction to the History of Science (1927), vol. 1, p. 391. ^ Alf Önnerfors, “Marcellus, De medicamentis: Latin de science, de superstition, d’humanité,” in Le latin médical: La constitution d’un langage scientifique: réalités et langage de la médecine dans le monde romain, edited by Guy Sabbah (Université de Saint-Étienne, 1991), p. 397; Jerry Stannard, “Marcellus of Bordeaux and the Beginnings of the Medieval Materia Medica,” Pharmacy in History 15 (1973), p. 51, note 4, as reprinted in Pristina Medicamenta: Ancient and Medieval Medical Botany, edited by Katherine E. Stannard and Richard Kay, Variorum Collected Studies Series (Aldershot 1999). ^ J.F. Matthews, “Gallic Supporters of Theodosius,” Latomus 30 (1971), pp. 1084–1087. ^ Spanish origin argued by K.F. Stroheker, Spanische Senatoren der spätrömischen und westgotischen Zeit, in Madrider Mitteilungen (1963) p. 121, note 75, cited and contradicted by J.F. Matthews, “Gallic Supporters of Theodosius,” Latomus 30 (1971) p. 1085. The De medicamentis seems to refer to Theodosius II, son of the emperor who had appointed Marcellus to office, suggesting that it was not circulated until his accession in January 408; see Alan Cameron, “A New Fragment of Eunapius,” Classical Review 17 (1967) 11. ^ Codex Theodosianus vi.29.8 (May 395) and xvi.5.29 (November 395). ^ Alf Önnerfors, “Marcellus, De medicamentis,” in Le latin médical (Université de Saint-Étienne, 1991), p. 397. ^ For careful and thoroughly documented conjecture about the political career of Marcellus, see J.F. Matthews, “Gallic Supporters of Theodosius,” Latomus 30 (1971) 1073–1099. ^ J.F. Matthews. “Gallic Supporters of Theodosius,” Latomus 30 (1971), p. 1086, who points out that earlier (in the period 379–88) Spaniards had predominated in Theodosius’s court. ^ Codex Theodosianus vii.1.14. ^ Codex Theodosianus xvi.5.29. ^ Alan Cameron, “A New Fragment of Eunapius,” Classical Review 17 (1967) 10–11. ^ Orosius 7.43.4: virum quendam Narbonensem inlustris sub Theodosio militiae, etiam religiosum prudentemque et gravem. ^ For the text of that declaration in English translation, see article on Ataulf. ^ J.F. Matthews, “Gallic Supporters of Theodosius,” Latomus 30 (1971), pp. 1085–1086. ^ For instance, David Frye, “A Mutual Friend of Athaulf and Jerome,” Historia 40 (1991) 507–508, argues for the Gaul named Rusticus who is mentioned in Jerome’s epistles. ^ Lynn Thorndike, The Place of Magic in the Intellectual History of Europe (New York 1905), p. 99, ^ Lynn Thorndike, History of Magic and Experimental Science (Columbia University Press 1923), p. 584, without citing the specific letter. ^ Jerry Stannard, “Marcellus of Bordeaux and the Beginnings of the Medieval Materia Medica,” Pharmacy in History 15 (1973), p. 48; Alf Önnerfors, “Marcellus, De medicamentis,” in Le latin médical (Université de Saint-Étienne, 1991), pp. 398–399; Carmélia Opsomer and Robert Halleux, “Marcellus ou le mythe empirique,” in Les écoles médicales à Rome, (Geneva: Librairie Droz, 1991). ^ William D. Sharpe, introduction to “Isidore of Seville: The Medical Writings. An English Translation with an Introduction and Commentary,” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 54 (1964), p. 14. ^ E.H.F. Meyer, Geschichte der Botanik (Königsberg 1854–57), vol. 2, p. 300, cited by Önnerfors, p. 398. ^ Thomas Habinek, The Politics of Latin Literature: Writing, Empire, and Identity in Ancient Rome (Princeton University Press, 1998); Roland Mayer, “Creating a Literature of Information in Rome,” in Wissensvermittlung in dichterischer Gestalt (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 2005), pp. 227–241. ^ Elizabeth Rawson, Intellectual Life in the Late Roman Republic (The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1985), p. 170; Carmélia Opsomer and Robert Halleux, “Marcellus ou le mythe empirique,” in Les écoles médicales à Rome (Geneva: Librairie Droz, 1991), p. 178. ^ Literacy among farm workers at the managerial level was perhaps not meant to be surprising; according to an interlocutor in Varro’s De re rustica (2.18), a master ought to require his cattleman to read veterinary excerpts from the work of Mago the Carthaginian, available in Latin and Greek translations. ^ De medicamentis prefatory epistle 3, edition of Maximillian Niedermann, Marcelli de medicamentis liber, vol. 5 of the Teubner Corpus Medicorum Latinorum (Leipzig, 1916), p. 3; discussion of general topic in Brendon Reay, “Agriculture, Writing, and Cato’s Aristocratic Self-Fashioning,” Classical Antiquity 24 (2005) 331–361. ^ De medicamentis prefatory epistle 3. ^ Alf Önnerfors, “Marcellus, De medicamentis,” in Le latin médical (Université de Saint-Étienne, 1991), p. 404–405. ^ Alan Cameron, “A New Fragment of Eunapius,” p. 11; J.F. Matthews, “Gallic Supporters of Theodosius,” Latomus 30 (1971) p. 1086. ^ Jerry Stannard, “Marcellus of Bordeaux and the Beginnings of the Medieval Materia Medica,” Pharmacy in History 15 (1973), p. 50. ^ Peter Brown, The Cult of the Saints: Its Rise and Function in Latin Christianity (University of Chicago Press, 1981), p. 117. ^ Carmélia Opsomer and Robert Halleux, “Marcellus ou le mythe empirique,” in Les écoles médicales à Rome (Geneva: Librairie Droz, 1991), p. 164. ^ T.D. Barnes and R.W. Westall, “The Conversion of the Roman Aristocracy in Prudentius’ Contra Symmachus,” Phoenix 45 (1991) 50–61; Prudentius, Contra Symmachum 1.506–607. ^ De civitate Dei 1.8; barbarian incursions are a subject relevant to Marcellus, living in 4th century Gaul under threat of the Visigoths. ^ On the interpenetration of Christianity and traditional religion and culture in the 4th century, see for instance Clifford Ando, “Pagan Apologetics and Christian Intolerance in the Ages of Themistius and Augustine,” Journal of Early Christian Studies 4 (1996) 171–207. ^ As by J.F. Matthews, “Gallic Supporters of Theodosius,” Latomus 30 (1971) p. 1086. ^ In nomine Christi, De medicamentis 25.13. ^ De medicamentis 21.2 ^ William M. Brashear, “The Greek Magical Papyri: ‘Voces Magicae’,” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II, 18.5 (1995), p. 3435; see also David E. Aune, “Magic in Early Christianity: Glossolalia and Voces Magicae,” reprinted in Apocalypticism, Prophecy and Magic in Early Christianity: Collected Essays (2006). ^ De medicamentis prefatory epistle 1. ^ De medicamentis 15.106, p. 121 in Niedermann; Gustav Must, “A Gaulish Incantation in Marcellus of Bordeaux,” Language 36 (1960) 193–197; Pierre-Yves Lambert, “Les formules de Marcellus de Bordeaux,” in La langue gauloise (Éditions Errance 2003), p.179, citing Léon Fleuriot, “Sur quelques textes gaulois,” Études celtiques 14 (1974) 57–66. ^ CIL XII.5336. ^ In the amount of 2,100 solidi. ^ John Matthews, Western Aristocracies and Imperial Court, A.D. 364–425 (Oxford University Press 1975), pp. 340–341, and “Gallic Supporters of Theodosius,” Latomus 30 (1971), p. 1087. ^ William D. Sharpe, “Isidore of Seville: The Medical Writings,” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 54 (1964), pp. 13–14. ^ Jerry Stannard, “Marcellus of Bordeaux and the Beginnings of the Medieval Materia Medica,” Pharmacy in History 15 (1973), p. 48. ^ Jerry Stannard, “Marcellus of Bordeaux and the Beginnings of the Medieval Materia Medica,” Pharmacy in History 15 (1973), p. 51, note 9. ^ D.R. Langslow, “The Epistula in Ancient Scientific and Technical Literature, with Special Reference to Medicine,” in Ancient Letters: Classical and Late Antique Epistolography, edited by Ruth Morello and A.D. Morrison (Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 218–219 and 230. ^ Jean-Marie André, “Du serment hippocratique à la déontologie de la médecine romaine,” Revue des études latines 83 (2005) 140–153. ^ Jerry Stannard, “Marcellus of Bordeaux and the Beginnings of the Medieval Materia Medica,” Pharmacy in History 15 (1973), p. 48. ^ E.H.F. Meyer, “Geschichte der Botanik,” vol. 2 (1855) 305-315 (Digitalisat), as cited by Jerry Stannard, “Marcellus of Bordeaux and the Beginnings of the Medieval Materia Medica,” Pharmacy in History 15 (1973), p. 52, note 23. Stannard finds about 350 plant names in all. ^ Jerry Stannard, “Marcellus of Bordeaux and the Beginnings of the Medieval Materia Medica,” Pharmacy in History 15 (1973), p. 50. ^ Marco Formisano, “Veredelte Bäume und kultivierte Texte. Lehrgedichte in technischen Prosawerken der Spätantike,” in Wissensvermittlung in dichterischer Gestalt (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 2005), pp. 295–312, with English summary. ^ Jerry Stannard, “Marcellus of Bordeaux and the Beginnings of the Medieval Materia Medica,” Pharmacy in History 15 (1973), pp. 47 and 50, also p. 53, notes 59 and 60, for extensive references. ^ Also De medicamentis 9.21, where herbae polygoni is equivalent to sanguinalis, reiterated at 9.81. ^ Jerry Stannard, “Marcellus of Bordeaux and the Beginnings of the Medieval Materia Medica,” Pharmacy in History 15 (1973), p. 50. ^ Sachiko Kusukawa, “Leonhart Fuchs on the Importance of Pictures,” Journal of the History of Ideas 58 (1997), pp. 423–426. ^ Jerry Stannard, “Marcellus of Bordeaux and the Beginnings of the Medieval Materia Medica,” Pharmacy in History 15 (1973), p. 50. ^ Wilfrid Bonser, The Medical Background of Anglo-Saxon England (1963) p. 252. ^ Mindy LacLeod and Bernard Mees, Runic Amulets and Magic Objects (Boydell Press, 2006), pp. 117 online, 139, and 141. ^ Peter Brown, The Cult of the Saints (University of Chicago Press, 1981), pp. 113–114. ^ De medicamentis, prefatory epistle 2, ab agrestibus et plebeis. ^ Peter Brown, The Cult of the Saints (University of Chicago Press, 1981), p. 116. ^ Aline Rousselle, “Du sanctuaire au thaumaturge,” Annales 31 (1976) p. 1095, as cited by Brown, The Cult of the Saints, p. 116: “Il devient sujet actif de sa guérison. … L’homme est engagé, corps et esprit, dans sa propre guérison.” ^ Peter Brown, The Cult of the Saints (University of Chicago Press, 1981) p. 118; Aline Rousselle, “Du sanctuaire au thaumaturge,” Annales 31 (1976) p. 1095, quoted by Brown, p. 116, refers to “une thérapie globale.” Authority control BIBSYS: 2053384 BNE: XX1365731 BNF: cb12851449j (data) CiNii: DA13504958 GND: 118781758 ISNI: 0000 0000 6145 0655 LCCN: n83218012 NTA: 069636087 SUDOC: 088782557 VcBA: 495/32344 VIAF: 196567001 WorldCat Identities: viaf-3266886 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marcellus_Empiricus&oldid=985883995" Categories: 4th-century Gallo-Roman people 4th-century Latin writers 5th-century Gallo-Roman people 5th-century Latin writers 5th-century physicians 5th-century scientists Ancient pharmacologists Ancient Roman medicine Ancient Roman physicians Encyclopedias of medicine Magistri officiorum Medical writers Hidden categories: Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CINII identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Languages Български Català Deutsch Español Esperanto Français Bahasa Indonesia Italiano Latina Magyar Русский Українська Edit links This page was last edited on 28 October 2020, at 14:44 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2323 ---- Horace: Revision history - Wikipedia Help Horace: Revision history View logs for this page (view filter log) Jump to navigation Jump to search Filter revisionsshowhideTo date: Tag filter: Show revisions External tools: Find addition/removal (Alternate) Find edits by user Page statistics Pageviews Fix dead links For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version,  m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary (newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500) curprev 13:30, 4 December 2020‎ Monkbot talk contribs‎ m 85,696 bytes −711‎ Task 18 (cosmetic): eval 62 templates: del empty params (97×); undo Tag: AWB curprev 18:50, 11 October 2020‎ Eelworm talk contribs‎ m 86,407 bytes −2‎ formatting undo curprev 18:43, 12 September 2020‎ Caius G. talk contribs‎ 86,409 bytes −1‎ Undid revision 978070857 by 76.103.160.110 (talk) typo? undo Tag: Undo curprev 18:39, 12 September 2020‎ 76.103.160.110 talk‎ 86,410 bytes +1‎ →‎Life undo curprev 08:44, 2 September 2020‎ Omnipaedista talk contribs‎ 86,409 bytes −3‎ as per MOS:DOB undo curprev 19:08, 11 August 2020‎ Modussiccandi talk contribs‎ 86,412 bytes +32‎ undo curprev 05:29, 27 June 2020‎ Regulov talk contribs‎ m 86,380 bytes +1‎ →‎Reception undo curprev 14:11, 14 June 2020‎ Jacona talk contribs‎ 86,379 bytes −19‎ removed redirect to a redirect page, straight to target undo curprev 16:36, 11 June 2020‎ Sharper talk contribs‎ 86,398 bytes +28‎ →‎top: merge hatnotes per WP:1HAT undo curprev 15:55, 6 June 2020‎ MonAll talk contribs‎ 86,370 bytes +39‎ Importing Wikidata short description: "Roman lyric poet" (Shortdesc helper) undo curprev 22:39, 13 May 2020‎ Gigajosh talk contribs‎ m 86,331 bytes +55‎ Added some Wikipedia links, e.g. for Epicureanism, Cynicism under the Themes section. undo Tag: Visual edit curprev 11:49, 17 April 2020‎ Doug Weller talk contribs‎ 86,276 bytes +152‎ Reverted to revision 950881566 by Sapphorain (talk): Take it to the talk page (TW) undo Tag: Undo curprev 02:30, 17 April 2020‎ 120.21.185.147 talk‎ 86,124 bytes −152‎ Erroneous, baseless, pic. Obtain a better one. undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit curprev 10:05, 14 April 2020‎ Sapphorain talk contribs‎ 86,276 bytes +152‎ Undid revision 950823215 by 120.21.185.147 (talk) undo Tag: Undo curprev 01:15, 14 April 2020‎ 120.21.185.147 talk‎ 86,124 bytes −152‎ Fraudulent image undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit curprev 02:58, 12 April 2020‎ Chewings72 talk contribs‎ 86,276 bytes +6‎ →‎Age of Enlightenment: Spelling/grammar/punctuation/typographical correction undo Tag: Visual edit curprev 02:45, 12 April 2020‎ Chewings72 talk contribs‎ 86,270 bytes +31‎ →‎Antiquity: Wikify link to Pindar#Influence and legacy undo Tag: Visual edit curprev 22:20, 10 April 2020‎ Paul August talk contribs‎ m 86,239 bytes −6‎ Reverted edits by 172.58.46.192 (talk) to last version by Srich32977 undo Tag: Rollback curprev 21:34, 10 April 2020‎ 172.58.46.192 talk‎ 86,245 bytes +6‎ →‎Themes undo Tag: review edit curprev 22:43, 26 March 2020‎ Srich32977 talk contribs‎ 86,239 bytes +12‎ layout undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit curprev 22:36, 26 March 2020‎ Srich32977 talk contribs‎ m 86,227 bytes −23‎ Fixed typo undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit curprev 22:18, 26 March 2020‎ Srich32977 talk contribs‎ m 86,250 bytes +1‎ ce undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit curprev 22:17, 26 March 2020‎ Srich32977 talk contribs‎ 86,249 bytes +4‎ consistency undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit curprev 22:12, 26 March 2020‎ Srich32977 talk contribs‎ 86,245 bytes +22‎ ce undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit curprev 22:07, 26 March 2020‎ Srich32977 talk contribs‎ 86,223 bytes +5‎ copy edits undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit curprev 22:04, 26 March 2020‎ Srich32977 talk contribs‎ 86,218 bytes +1‎ edit page numbers undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit curprev 09:39, 20 March 2020‎ I dream of horses talk contribs‎ m 86,217 bytes +2‎ →‎External links: clean up, typo(s) fixed: 1864-9 → 1864–9 undo Tag: AWB curprev 19:29, 25 February 2020‎ Gnuish talk contribs‎ 86,215 bytes +51‎ →‎Age of Enlightenment: punctuation; translate more phrases undo curprev 11:32, 12 February 2020‎ Tullyvallin talk contribs‎ m 86,164 bytes −6‎ →‎Life undo curprev 01:45, 9 February 2020‎ Anonymous from the 21st century talk contribs‎ 86,170 bytes +77‎ →‎19th century on undo Tag: 2017 wikitext editor curprev 10:19, 26 January 2020‎ 2001:4450:43f4:8c00:4bd:790c:b2c8:a751 talk‎ 86,093 bytes +4‎ →‎Life undo curprev 16:53, 29 December 2019‎ 98.169.134.4 talk‎ 86,089 bytes 0‎ caps undo curprev 01:20, 7 December 2019‎ Kennethaw88 talk contribs‎ 86,089 bytes 0‎ fixing typo undo curprev 17:45, 30 November 2019‎ 78.151.188.37 talk‎ 86,089 bytes 0‎ →‎In Popular Culture undo curprev 23:48, 23 November 2019‎ Aldan-2 talk contribs‎ m 86,089 bytes +377‎ Added section undo Tag: Visual edit curprev 20:38, 20 November 2019‎ InternetArchiveBot talk contribs‎ 85,712 bytes +241‎ Bluelink 3 books for verifiability.) #IABot (v2.0) (GreenC bot undo curprev 11:44, 28 October 2019‎ Chewings72 talk contribs‎ m 85,471 bytes −2‎ Reverted edits by 87.103.17.42 (talk) to last version by DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered undo Tag: Rollback curprev 11:01, 28 October 2019‎ 87.103.17.42 talk‎ 85,473 bytes +2‎ →‎Themes undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit curprev 09:28, 27 October 2019‎ DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered talk contribs‎ m 85,471 bytes −1,593‎ Reverted edits by 175.198.36.193 (talk) to last version by Celia Homeford undo Tag: Rollback curprev 09:27, 27 October 2019‎ 175.198.36.193 talk‎ 87,064 bytes +1,593‎ undo curprev 13:34, 3 September 2019‎ Celia Homeford talk contribs‎ 85,471 bytes +9‎ Disambiguate. undo curprev 18:16, 31 August 2019‎ BD2412 talk contribs‎ m 85,462 bytes +1‎ →‎Poet: clean up spacing around commas and other punctuation, replaced: ,C → , C undo Tag: AWB curprev 23:24, 28 August 2019‎ InternetArchiveBot talk contribs‎ 85,461 bytes +113‎ Bluelinking 2 books for verifiability.) #IABot (v2.1alpha2 undo curprev 16:49, 26 August 2019‎ Sapphorain talk contribs‎ 85,348 bytes −26‎ Undid revision 912582406 by 2600:1702:31B0:9CE0:B17D:1077:68C8:A57F (talk) Absurd and useless information: every prominent figure not himself a slave was a slave owner then undo Tag: Undo curprev 15:50, 26 August 2019‎ 2600:1702:31b0:9ce0:b17d:1077:68c8:a57f talk‎ 85,374 bytes +26‎ undo curprev 18:46, 12 August 2019‎ James Hyett talk contribs‎ m 85,348 bytes +17‎ →‎Middle Ages and Renaissance undo Tag: Visual edit curprev 09:11, 3 July 2019‎ Paul August talk contribs‎ 85,331 bytes −19‎ Undid revision 904560324 by Samuel Enderby (talk) POV undo Tag: Undo curprev 00:23, 3 July 2019‎ Samuel Enderby talk contribs‎ 85,350 bytes +19‎ →‎Translations undo curprev 10:44, 7 April 2019‎ 2804:7f7:dc80:9e69::2 talk‎ 85,331 bytes −13‎ →‎19th century on undo curprev 15:24, 25 March 2019‎ Shouwa Genroku talk contribs‎ 85,344 bytes +1‎ undo (newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500) Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horace" Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Atom Upload file Special pages Page information Wikidata item Languages Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2333 ---- View source for Horace - Wikipedia View source for Horace ← Horace Jump to navigation Jump to search You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons: Your IP address is in a range that has been blocked on all Wikimedia Foundation wikis. The block was made by Jon Kolbert (meta.wikimedia.org). The reason given is Open Proxy: Webhost: Contact stewards if you are affected . Start of block: 20:12, 23 July 2019 Expiry of block: 20:12, 23 January 2022 Your current IP address is 40.76.139.33 and the blocked range is 40.76.0.0/16. Please include all above details in any queries you make. If you believe you were blocked by mistake, you can find additional information and instructions in the No open proxies global policy. Otherwise, to discuss the block please post a request for review on Meta-Wiki or send an email to the stewards OTRS queue at stewards@wikimedia.org including all above details. You are currently unable to edit Wikipedia due to a block affecting your IP address. This does not affect your ability to read Wikipedia pages. Most people who see this message have done nothing wrong. Some kinds of blocks restrict editing from specific service providers or telecom companies in response to recent abuse or vandalism, and affect other users who are unrelated to that abuse. See below if you do not believe you have done anything wrong. Editing from 40.76.0.0/16 has been blocked (disabled) by ‪SQL‬ for the following reason(s): The IP address that you are currently using has been blocked because it is believed to be a web host provider or colocation provider. To prevent abuse, web hosts and colocation providers may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You will not be able to edit Wikipedia using a web host or colocation provider because it hides your IP address, much like a proxy or VPN. We recommend that you attempt to use another connection to edit. For example, if you use a proxy or VPN to connect to the internet, turn it off when editing Wikipedia. If you edit using a mobile connection, try using a Wi-Fi connection, and vice versa. If you have a Wikipedia account, please log in. If you do not have any other way to edit Wikipedia, you will need to request an IP block exemption. If you are confident that you are not using a web host, you may appeal this block by adding the following text on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is _______. Place any further information here. ~~~~}}. You must fill in the blank with your IP address for this block to be investigated. Your IP address can be determined here. Alternatively, if you wish to keep your IP address private you can use the unblock ticket request system. There are several reasons you might be editing using the IP address of a web host or colocation provider (such as if you are using VPN software or a business network); please use this method of appeal only if you think your IP address is in fact not a web host or colocation provider. Administrators: The IP block exemption user right should only be applied to allow users to edit using web host in exceptional circumstances, and requests should usually be directed to the functionaries team via email. If you intend to give the IPBE user right, a CheckUser needs to take a look at the account. This can be requested most easily at SPI Quick Checkuser Requests. Unblocking an IP or IP range with this template is highly discouraged without at least contacting the blocking administrator. This block has been set to expire: 16:25, 2 June 2023. Even when blocked, you will usually still be able to edit your user talk page and email other editors and administrators. For information on how to proceed, first see the FAQ for blocked users and the guideline on block appeals. The guide to appealing blocks may also be helpful. Other useful links: Blocking policy · Help:I have been blocked You can view and copy the source of this page: ===Age of Enlightenment=== During the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, or the [[Age of Enlightenment]], neoclassical culture was pervasive. English literature in the middle of that period has been dubbed [[Augustan literature|Augustan]]. It is not always easy to distinguish Horace's influence during those centuries (the mixing of influences is shown for example in one poet's pseudonym, ''Horace Juvenal'').'Horace Juvenal' was author of ''Modern manners: a poem'', 1793 However a measure of his influence can be found in the diversity of the people interested in his works, both among readers and authors.D. Money, ''The seventeenth and eighteenth centuries'', 318, 331, 332 New editions of his works were published almost yearly. There were three new editions in 1612 (two in [[Leiden]], one in [[Frankfurt]]) and again in 1699 ([[Utrecht]], [[Barcelona]], [[Cambridge]]). Cheap editions were plentiful and fine editions were also produced, including one whose entire text was engraved by [[John Pine]] in [[copperplate engraving|copperplate]]. The poet [[James Thomson (poet)|James Thomson]] owned five editions of Horace's work and the physician [[James Douglas (physician)|James Douglas]] had five hundred books with Horace-related titles. Horace was often commended in periodicals such as [[The Spectator (1711)|The Spectator]], as a hallmark of good judgement, moderation and manliness, a focus for moralising.see for example ''Spectator'' '''312''', 27 Feb. 1712; '''548''', 28 Nov. 1712; '''618''', 10 Nov. 1714 His verses offered a fund of mottoes, such as ''[[simplex munditiis]]'' (elegance in simplicity), ''[[splendide mendax]]'' (nobly untruthful), ''[[sapere aude]]'' (dare to know), ''[[nunc est bibendum]]'' (now is the time to drink), ''[[carpe diem]]'' (seize the day, perhaps the only one still in common use today). These were quoted even in works as prosaic as [[Edmund Quincy (1703-1788)|Edmund Quincy]]'s ''A treatise of hemp-husbandry'' (1765). The fictional hero [[The History of Tom Jones, a Foundling|Tom Jones]] recited his verses with feeling.D. Money, ''The seventeenth and eighteenth centuries'', 322 His works were also used to justify commonplace themes, such as patriotic obedience, as in James Parry's English lines from an Oxford University collection in 1736:D. Money, ''The seventeenth and eighteenth centuries'', 326–27 {{poemquote| What friendly [[Muse]] will teach my Lays To emulate the Roman fire? Justly to sound a Caeser's praise Demands a bold Horatian lyre. }} Horatian-style lyrics were increasingly typical of Oxford and Cambridge verse collections for this period, most of them in Latin but some like the previous ode in English. [[John Milton]]'s [[Lycidas]] first appeared in such a collection. It has few Horatian echoesOne echo of Horace may be found in line 69: "''Were it not better done as others use,/ To sport with Amaryllis in the shade/Or with the tangles of Neaera's hair?''", which points to the Neara in ''Odes'' 3.14.21 (Douglas Bush, ''Milton: Poetical Works'', 144, note 69) yet Milton's associations with Horace were lifelong. He composed a controversial version of ''Odes'' 1.5, and [[Paradise Lost]] includes references to Horace's 'Roman' ''Odes'' 3.1–6 (Book 7 for example begins with echoes of ''Odes'' 3.4).J. Talbot, ''A Horatian Pun in Paradise Lost'', 21–3 Yet Horace's lyrics could offer inspiration to libertines as well as moralists, and neo-Latin sometimes served as a kind of discrete veil for the risqué. Thus for example [[Benjamin Loveling]] authored a catalogue of Drury Lane and Covent Garden prostitutes, in Sapphic stanzas, and an encomium for a dying lady "of salacious memory".B. Loveling, ''Latin and English Poems'', 49–52, 79–83 Some Latin imitations of Horace were politically subversive, such as a marriage ode by [[Anthony Alsop]] that included a rallying cry for the [[Jacobitism|Jacobite]] cause. On the other hand, [[Andrew Marvell]] took inspiration from Horace's ''Odes'' 1.37 to compose his English masterpiece [[Horatian Ode upon Cromwell's Return from Ireland]], in which subtly nuanced reflections on the execution of [[Charles I of England|Charles I]] echo Horace's ambiguous response to the death of [[Cleopatra]] (Marvell's ode was suppressed in spite of its subtlety and only began to be widely published in 1776). [[Samuel Johnson]] took particular pleasure in reading ''The Odes''.Cfr. [[James Boswell]], "The Life of [[Samuel Johnson]]" ''Aetat.'' 20, 1729 where Boswell remarked of Johnson that Horace's ''Odes'' "were the compositions in which he took most delight." [[Alexander Pope]] wrote direct ''Imitations'' of Horace (published with the original Latin alongside) and also echoed him in ''Essays'' and [[The Rape of the Lock]]. He even emerged as "a quite Horatian Homer" in his translation of the ''[[Iliad]]''.D. Money, ''The seventeenth and eighteenth centuries'', 329–31 Horace appealed also to female poets, such as [[Anna Seward]] (''Original sonnets on various subjects, and odes paraphrased from Horace'', 1799) and [[Elizabeth Tollet]], who composed a Latin ode in Sapphic meter to celebrate her brother's return from overseas, with tea and coffee substituted for the wine of Horace's [[symposium|sympotic]] settings: {{verse translation|lang=la | Quos procax nobis numeros, jocosque Musa dictaret? mihi dum tibique Temperent baccis Arabes, vel herbis Pocula SeresE. Tollet, ''Poems on Several Occasions'', 84 | What verses and jokes might the bold Muse dictate? while for you and me Arabs flavour our cups with beans Or Chinese with leaves.Translation adapted from D. Money, ''The seventeenth and eighteenth centuries'', 329 }} Horace's ''Ars Poetica'' is second only to Aristotle's ''Poetics'' in its influence on literary theory and criticism. Milton recommended both works in his treatise ''of Education''.A. Gilbert, ''Literary Criticism: Plato to Dryden'', 124, 669 Horace's ''Satires'' and ''Epistles'' however also had a huge impact, influencing theorists and critics such as [[John Dryden]].W. Kupersmith, ''Roman Satirists in Seventeenth Century England'', 97–101 There was considerable debate over the value of different lyrical forms for contemporary poets, as represented on one hand by the kind of four-line stanzas made familiar by Horace's Sapphic and Alcaic ''Odes'' and, on the other, the loosely structured [[Pindarics]] associated with the odes of [[Pindar]]. Translations occasionally involved scholars in the dilemmas of censorship. Thus [[Christopher Smart]] entirely omitted ''Odes'' [[:wikisource:la:Carmina (Horatius)/Liber IV/Carmen X|4.10]] and re-numbered the remaining odes. He also removed the ending of ''Odes'' [[:wikisource:la:Carmina (Horatius)/Liber IV/Carmen I|4.1]]. [[Thomas Creech]] printed ''Epodes'' [[:wikisource:la:Epodi#VIII|8]] and [[:wikisource:la:Epodi#XII|12]] in the original Latin but left out their English translations. [[Philip Francis (translator)|Philip Francis]] left out both the English and Latin for those same two epodes, a gap in the numbering the only indication that something was amiss. French editions of Horace were influential in England and these too were regularly [[bowdlerize]]d. Most European nations had their own 'Horaces': thus for example [[Friedrich von Hagedorn]] was called ''The German Horace'' and [[Maciej Kazimierz Sarbiewski]] ''The Polish Horace'' (the latter was much imitated by English poets such as [[Henry Vaughan]] and [[Abraham Cowley]]). Pope [[Urban VIII]] wrote voluminously in Horatian meters, including an ode on gout.D. Money, ''The seventeenth and eighteenth centuries'', 319–25 Return to Horace. Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horace" Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Page information Wikidata item Languages Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2334 ---- Roman bridge - Wikipedia Roman bridge From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search For a list of known Roman bridges, see List of Roman bridges. For the railway station in Wales, see Roman Bridge railway station. The Alcántara Bridge, Spain, a masterpiece of ancient bridge building Roman bridges, built by ancient Romans, were the first large and lasting bridges built.[1] Roman bridges were built with stone and had the arch as the basic structure (see arch bridge). Most utilized concrete as well, which the Romans were the first to use for bridges. Contents 1 Typology 1.1 Arch shapes 1.2 Typical characteristics 2 Opus pontis 3 Examples 3.1 Large river bridging 4 Gallery 5 See also 6 Footnotes 7 References 8 External links Typology[edit] Known Roman bridges[2] Country Number Europe 800 Italian base 460 Spain 142 France 172 Germany 130 Great Britain 129 Portugal 114 Yugoslavia 113 Switzerland 111 Greece 110 Netherlands 114 Bulgaria 113 Luxemburg 113 Albania 112 Austria 112 Belgium 112 Romania 112 Hungary 111 Asia 174 Turkey 155 Syria 117 Jordan 115 Lebanon 114 Israel 112 Iraq 111 Africa 157 Tunisia 133 Algeria 119 Libya 115 Total 1931 As with the vault and the dome, the Romans were the first to fully realize the potential of arches for bridge construction.[3] Roman pontoon bridge across the lower Danube A list of Roman bridges compiled by the engineer Colin O'Connor features 330 Roman stone bridges for traffic, 34 Roman timber bridges and 54 Roman aqueduct bridges, a substantial part still standing and even used to carry vehicles.[4] A more complete survey by the Italian scholar Vittorio Galliazzo found 931 Roman bridges, mostly of stone, in as many as 26 different countries (including former Yugoslavia; see right table).[5] Roman arch bridges were usually semicircular, although a few were segmental (such as Alconétar Bridge). A segmental arch is an arch that is less than a semicircle.[6] The advantages of the segmental arch bridge were that it allowed great amounts of flood water to pass under it, which would prevent the bridge from being swept away during floods and the bridge itself could be more lightweight. Generally, Roman bridges featured wedge-shaped primary arch stones (voussoirs) of the same in size and shape. The Romans built both single spans and lengthy multiple arch aqueducts, such as the Pont du Gard and Segovia Aqueduct. Their bridges featured from an early time onwards flood openings in the piers, e.g. in the Pons Fabricius in Rome (62 BC), one of the world's oldest major bridges still standing. Roman engineers were the first and until the industrial revolution the only ones to construct bridges with concrete, which they called opus caementicium. The outside was usually covered with brick or ashlar, as in the Alcántara Bridge. The Romans also introduced segmental arch bridges into bridge construction. The 330 m long Limyra Bridge in southwestern Turkey features 26 segmental arches with an average span-to-rise ratio of 5.3:1,[7] giving the bridge an unusually flat profile unsurpassed for more than a millennium. Trajan's bridge over the Danube featured open-spandrel segmental arches made of wood (standing on 40 m high concrete piers). This was to be the longest arch bridge for a thousand years both in terms of overall and individual span length, while the longest extant Roman bridge is the 790 m long Puente Romano at Mérida. The late Roman Karamagara Bridge in Cappadocia may represent the earliest surviving bridge featuring a pointed arch.[8] Arch shapes[edit] Pons Fabricius in Rome, Italy Early Roman arch bridges, influenced by the ancient notion of the ideal form of the circle, often describe a full circle, with the stone arch continuing underground. A typical example is the Pons Fabricius in Rome. Later, Roman masonry bridges rested mostly on semi-circular arches, or, to a lesser extent, on segmental arches.[9][10] For the later design, which shows an early, local concentration in north-eastern Italy, but can be found scattered throughout the whole empire, the Limyra Bridge, the Alconétar Bridge and the Ponte San Lorenzo are prime examples. In addition, a number of other arch forms make rare appearances, in some cases of which later deformations cannot be ruled out. The late antique Karamagara Bridge represents an early example for the use of pointed arches Typical characteristics[edit] Puente Romano, Mérida, Spain. With an overall length of 792 m and still in use, is the largest surviving Roman bridge Many are more than 5 metres wide Most of them slope slightly Many have rustic work The stonework has alternating stretcher and header courses ; i.e. one layer of rectangular stones is laid lengthwise, and the next layer has the ends facing outwards Stones linked with dovetail joints or metal bars Indents in the stones for gripping tools to hold on to (Source Traianus – An endeavour to identify Roman Bridges built in former Hispania) Opus pontis[edit] The costs of building and repairing bridges, known as opus pontis ("bridge work"), were the responsibility of multiple local municipalities. Their shared costs prove Roman bridges belonged to the region overall, and not to any one town (or two, if on a border). The Alcántara Bridge in Lusitania, for example, was built at the expense of 12 local municipalities, whose names were added on an inscription.[11] Later, in the Roman Empire, the local lords of the land had to pay tithes to the empire for opus pontis.[12][13] The Anglo-Saxons continued this practice with bricg-geworc, a literal translation of opus pontis.[14] Examples[edit] For outstanding achievements of Roman bridge building, see List of ancient architectural records. The remaining arch of the Pons Aemilius, located in the middle of the Tiber Built in 142 BC, the Pons Aemilius, later named Ponte Rotto (broken bridge), is the oldest Roman stone bridge in Rome, Italy. The largest Roman bridge was Trajan's bridge over the lower Danube, constructed by Apollodorus of Damascus, which remained for over a millennium the longest bridge to have been built both in terms of overall and span length. They were most of the time at least 2 metres above the body of water. An example of temporary military bridge construction are the two Caesar's Rhine bridges. Large river bridging[edit] Roman engineers built stone arch or stone pillar bridges over all major rivers of their Imperium, save two: the Euphrates which lay at the frontier to the rival Persian empires, and the Nile, the longest river in the world, which was 'bridged' as late as 1902 by the British Old Aswan Dam.[15] The largest rivers to be spanned by solid bridges by the Romans were the Danube and the Rhine, the two largest European rivers west of the Eurasian Steppe. The lower Danube was crossed by least two (Trajan's Bridge, Constantine's Bridge) and the middle and lower Rhine by four different bridges (Roman Bridge at Mainz, Caesar's Rhine bridges, Roman Bridge at Koblenz, Roman Bridge at Cologne). For rivers with strong currents and to allow swift army movements, pontoon bridges were also routinely employed.[16] Going from the distinct lack of records of pre-modern solid bridges spanning larger rivers,[17] the Roman feat appears to be unsurpassed anywhere in the world until into the 19th century. Gallery[edit] Römerbrücke in Trier, Germany Pont Julien in Apt, France The Roman Bridge in Vaison-la-Romaine, France Pont Ambroix, France Ponte Sant'Angelo in Rome, Italy Ponte Milvio in Rome, Italy Ponte Pietra in Verona, Italy Puente de Alconétar, Spain Taşköprü, in Adana, Cilicia region, Turkey Eurymedon Bridge at Selge, Turkey Limyra Bridge, Turkey Pont de Pierre (Aosta), Aosta Valley, Italy Severan Bridge, Turkey Bermaña Bridge, in Caldas de Reis, Spain Pira Delal, in Zakho, Kurdistan Region, Iraq See also[edit] List of Roman bridges Bridges in Rome Record-holding bridges in antiquity Roman architecture Roman architectural revolution Footnotes[edit] ^ O’Connor 1993, p. 1 ^ Galliazzo 1994, p. 2 (Indice). Galliazzo's survey excludes Late Roman or Byzantine structures. ^ Robertson, D.S.: Greek and Roman Architecture, 2nd edn., Cambridge 1943, p.231: "The Romans were the first builders in Europe, perhaps the first in the world, fully to appreciate the advantages of the arch, the vault and the dome." ^ Colin O'Connor: "Roman Bridges", Cambridge University Press 1993, p. 187ff. ISBN 0-521-39326-4 ^ Galliazzo, Vittorio (1994), I ponti romani. Catalogo generale, Vol. 2, Treviso: Edizioni Canova, ISBN 88-85066-66-6, cf. Indice ^ Beall, Christine (1988). "Designing the segmental arch" (PDF). ebuild.com. Retrieved 8 May 2010. [permanent dead link] ^ Colin O'Connor: "Roman Bridges", Cambridge University Press 1993, p. 126 ISBN 0-521-39326-4 ^ Galliazzo 1995, pp. 92, 93 (fig. 39) ^ Galliazzo 1995, pp. 429–437 ^ O’Connor 1993, p. 171 ^ Frothingham, A.I. (1915). "The Roman Territorial Arch". American Journal of Archaeology. Macmillan Company. 14 (19): 159, 172. ^ James-Raoul, Danièle; Thomasset, Claude (2006). Les ponts au Moyen Âge (in French). Presses Paris Sorbonne. p. 201. ISBN 9782840503736. Retrieved 15 July 2017. ^ Gillespie, Donald S. (2015). Le Beau Dieu. Holy Fire Publishing. p. 27. ISBN 9781603835084. Retrieved 15 July 2017. ^ Bosworth, Joseph (1882). An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary: Based on the Manuscript Collections of the Late Joseph Bosworth ... Clarendon Press. p. 125. Retrieved 15 July 2017. ^ O’Connor 1993, pp. 193–202 (Appendices A and B) ^ O’Connor 1993, pp. 133–139 ^ Fernández Troyano 2003 References[edit] Fuentes, Manuel Durán: La construcción de puentes romanos en Hispania, Xunta de Galicia, Santiago de Compostela 2004, ISBN 978-84-453-3937-4 Fernández Troyano, Leonardo (2003), Bridge Engineering. A Global Perspective, London: Thomas Telford Publishing, ISBN 0-7277-3215-3 Galliazzo, Vittorio (1995), I ponti romani, Vol. 1, Treviso: Edizioni Canova, ISBN 88-85066-66-6 Galliazzo, Vittorio (1994), I ponti romani. Catalogo generale, Vol. 2, Treviso: Edizioni Canova, ISBN 88-85066-66-6 Gazzola, Piero (1963), Ponti romani. Contributo ad un indice sistematico con studio critico bibliografico, Florence O’Connor, Colin (1993), Roman Bridges, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-39326-4 External links[edit] Wikimedia Commons has media related to Roman bridges. Traianus - Technical investigation of Roman public works The Waters of Rome: Tiber River Bridges and the Development of the Ancient City of Rome Livius.org: Pontes longi – Roman bog bridges v t e Roman bridges England Chesters Bridge Piercebridge Roman Bridge Pons Aelius France Pont Ambroix Pont de Bornègre Pont des Marchands Pont du Gard Pont Flavien Pont Julien Pont Serme Pont sur la Laye Roman Bridge (Saint-Thibéry) Roman Bridge (Vaison-la-Romaine) Germany Caesar's Rhine bridges Roman Bridge (Trier) Iran Band-e Kaisar Italy Pons Aemilius Pons Agrippae Ponte Altinate Pons Cestius Pons Fabricius Pons Neronianus Pons Probi Pons Sublicius Pont d'Aël Pont de Pierre (Aosta) Pont-Saint-Martin Ponte d'Augusto (Narni) Ponte di Tiberio (Rimini) Ponte Corvo Ponte del Gran Caso Ponte Milvio Ponte Molino (Padua) Ponte Nomentano Ponte Pietra (Verona) Ponte di Pioraco Ponte di Quintodecimo Ponte Salario Ponte San Lorenzo Ponte Sant'Angelo Susegana Bridge Lebanon Leontes Bridge Portugal Ponte de Rubiães Ponte Nova da Cava da Velha Roman Bridge (Chaves) Romania Constantine's Bridge (Danube) Trajan's Bridge Spain Acueducto de los Milagros, Mérida Albarregas bridge, Mérida Alcántara's bridge Ávila's bridge Puente de Alcántara, Toledo Garrovillas de Alconétar's bridge Córdoba's bridge Lugo's bridge Aqüeducte de les Ferreres, Tarragona Mérida's bridge Salamanca's bridge Segovia's aqueduct Talamanca de Jarama's bridge Syria Ain Diwar Bridge Bridge at Nimreh Gemarrin Bridge Kharaba Bridge Turkey Aesepus Bridge Arapsu Bridge Bridge at Oinoanda Constantine's Bridge (Mysia) Eurymedon Bridge (Aspendos) Eurymedon Bridge (Selge) Karamagara Bridge Kemer Bridge Limyra Bridge Misis Bridge Macestus Bridge Nysa Bridge Penkalas Bridge Pergamon Bridge Sangarius Bridge Severan Bridge Taşköprü (Adana) Valens Aqueduct Bridge White Bridge (Mysia) Full list of Roman bridges v t e Ancient bridges on the Tiber (from source to mouth) Upstream Milvius (Molle) Ælius (Sant'Angelo) Neronianus† Agrippae (Sisto) Aurelius† After Tiber Isl. Fabricius Cestius Æmilius (Rotto)† Sublicius† Probi† † partly or wholly underwater or demolished Names are in the original Latin; in parentheses are the Italian names that differ significantly v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films Authority control LCCN: sh96007908 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Roman_bridge&oldid=995828273" Categories: Ancient Roman architecture Roman bridges Hidden categories: All articles with dead external links Articles with dead external links from December 2017 Articles with permanently dead external links CS1 French-language sources (fr) CS1: long volume value Commons category link is on Wikidata Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Languages العربية Brezhoneg Català Esperanto Français Latina Português Русский Slovenščina Tagalog Українська Tiếng Việt Edit links This page was last edited on 23 December 2020, at 02:45 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2339 ---- Niall Rudd - Wikipedia Niall Rudd From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search William James Niall Rudd (23 June 1927 – 5 October 2015) was an Irish-born British classical scholar.[1] Life and work[edit] Rudd was born in Dublin and studied Classics at Trinity College, Dublin. He then taught Latin at the Universities of Hull and Manchester.[2] From 1958 to 1968 he was Associate Professor of Latin at University College, Toronto. In 1968 he returned to England and taught for five years as a professor of Latin at the University of Liverpool. In 1973 he moved to the University of Bristol to the chair of Latin, where he remained until his retirement in 1989. From 1976 to 1979 he was Director (Head of Department) of the Department of Classics and Archaeology.[3] After retirement Rudd returned to Liverpool and was appointed an Honorary Research Fellow there. Trinity College Dublin awarded him an honorary doctorate in 1998 (DLitt). Rudd died of Melanoma after a long illness (Alzheimer's) on 5 October 2015 at St. John's Hospice on the Wirral. Rudd worked intensively with Latin literature, especially Roman poetry, and its reception in English literature of the modern age. He wrote books, monographs and articles about works of Cicero, and on the satires of Horace and Juvenal whose work he presented in English translation. This work has been published in two collections (1994, 2005). In addition, he published, in 1994, an autobiographical record of his childhood and youth in Ireland. Bibliography[edit] The Satires of Horace. A Study (1966) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [4] The Satires of Horace and Persius. A verse translation with an introduction and notes (1973) London: Harmondsworth Press Essays on Classical Literature, Selected from Arion and introduced by Niall Rudd (1974) Cambridge: Heffer Press Lines of Enquiry – Studies in Latin Poetry (1976) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press with Edward Courtney: Juvenal: Satires I, III, X (1977) Bristol: Bristol Classical Press T. E. Page: Schoolmaster Extraordinary (1981) Bristol: Bristol Classical Press The Satires of Horace (1982) Bristol: Bristol Classical Press Themes in Roman Satire (1986) London: Duckworth Press Cicero: 'De Legibus I'. (1987) Bristol: Bristol Classical Press Horace, Epistles Book II and Epistle to the Pisones (‘Ars Poetica’) (1989) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Juvenal. The Satires (1991) Oxford: Oxford University Press The Classical Tradition in Operation: Chaucer/Virgil, Shakespeare/Plautus, Pope/Horace, Tennyson/Lucretius, Pound/Propertius (1994) Toronto: University of Toronto Press Pale Green, Light Orange. A Portrait of Bourgeois Ireland 1930-1950 (1994) Dublin: Lilliput Press[2] with JGF Powell: Marcus Tullius Cicero: 'The Republic' and 'The Laws' (1998) Oxford: Oxford University Press with Robin G. M. Nisbet: A Commentary on Horace, Odes, Book III (2004) Oxford: Oxford University Press Horace, Odes and Epodes (2004) Cambridge (Massachusetts): Harvard University Press (Loeb Classical Library)[5] The Common Spring. Essays on Latin and English Poetry. (2005) Exeter: Bristol Phoenix Press Lines of Enquiry. Studies in Latin Poetry (2005) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Samuel Johnson: The Latin Poems (2005) Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press Landor’s Latin Poems: Fifty Pieces (2010) Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press References[edit] ^ "Bristol University - News - October: Niall Rudd". bristol.ac.uk. ^ a b "The Lilliput Press". lilliputpress.ie. ^ "Niall Rudd". Penguin Classics UK. ^ "Review". JSTOR 293312. Missing or empty |url= (help) ^ "Nicholas Horsfall reviews 'Horace' edited by Niall Rudd · LRB 23 June 2005". London Review of Books. Authority control BNF: cb120544743 (data) GND: 1066399042 ISNI: 0000 0001 1027 2809 LCCN: n85805339 NTA: 067985009 VIAF: 56629043 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n85805339 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Niall_Rudd&oldid=794852779" Categories: British classical scholars Irish classical scholars 1927 births 2015 deaths Hidden categories: Pages using web citations with no URL Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Deutsch Edit links This page was last edited on 10 August 2017, at 12:17 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-234 ---- Roman naming conventions - Wikipedia Roman naming conventions From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Roman naming conventions Over the course of some fourteen centuries, the Romans and other peoples of Italy employed a system of nomenclature that differed from that used by other cultures of Europe and the Mediterranean Sea, consisting of a combination of personal and family names. Although conventionally referred to as the tria nomina, the combination of praenomen, nomen, and cognomen that have come to be regarded as the basic elements of the Roman name in fact represent a continuous process of development, from at least the seventh century BC to the end of the seventh century AD. The names that developed as part of this system became a defining characteristic of Roman civilization, and although the system itself vanished during the Early Middle Ages, the names themselves exerted a profound influence on the development of European naming practices, and many continue to survive in modern languages. Contents 1 Overview 2 Origin and development 3 Tria nomina 3.1 Praenomen 3.2 Nomen 3.3 Cognomen 3.3.1 Agnomen 3.3.1.1 Cognomina ex virtute 3.3.1.2 Adoptive cognomina 4 Filiation 5 Tribe 6 Women's names 7 Foreign names 8 Imperial names 9 Later development 9.1 Binary nomenclature and polyonymy 9.2 Cognomen replaces praenomen 9.3 Edict of Caracalla 9.4 Traditional nomen replaced 10 See also 11 Notes 12 References 13 Bibliography 14 External links Overview[edit] The distinguishing feature of Roman nomenclature was the use of both personal names and regular surnames. Throughout Europe and the Mediterranean, other ancient civilizations distinguished individuals through the use of single personal names, usually dithematic in nature. Consisting of two distinct elements, or "themes", these names allowed for hundreds or even thousands of possible combinations. But a markedly different system of nomenclature arose in Italy, where the personal name was joined by a hereditary surname. Over time, this binomial system expanded to include additional names and designations.[1][2] An Etruscan musician, fresco from the Tomb of the Triclinium, near Tarquinii, c. 470 BC The most important of these names was the nomen gentilicium, or simply nomen, a hereditary surname that identified a person as a member of a distinct gens. This was preceded by the praenomen, or "forename", a personal name that served to distinguish between the different members of a family. For example, a Roman named Publius Lemonius might have sons named Publius, Lucius, and Gaius Lemonius. Here, Lemonius is the nomen, identifying each person in the family as a member of the gens Lemonia; Publius, Lucius, and Gaius are praenomina used to distinguish between them.[1] The origin of this binomial system is lost in prehistory, but it appears to have been established in Latium and Etruria by at least 650 BC.[2] In written form, the nomen was usually followed by a filiation, indicating the personal name of an individual's father, and sometimes the name of the mother or other antecedents. Toward the end of the Roman Republic, this was followed by the name of a citizen's voting tribe. Lastly, these elements could be followed by additional surnames, or cognomina, which could be either personal or hereditary, or a combination of both.[1] The Roman grammarians came to regard the combination of praenomen, nomen, and cognomen as a defining characteristic of Roman citizenship, known as the tria nomina. However, although all three elements of the Roman name existed throughout most of Roman history, the concept of the tria nomina can be misleading, because not all of these names were required or used throughout the whole of Roman history. During the period of the Roman Republic, the praenomen and nomen represented the essential elements of the name; the cognomen first appeared among the Roman aristocracy at the inception of the Republic, but was not widely used among the plebeians, who made up the majority of the Roman people, until the second century BC. Even then, not all Roman citizens bore cognomina, and until the end of the Republic the cognomen was regarded as somewhat less than an official name. By contrast, in imperial times the cognomen became the principal distinguishing element of the Roman name, and although praenomina never completely vanished, the essential elements of the Roman name from the second century onward were the nomen and cognomen.[2] Naming conventions for women also varied from the classical concept of the tria nomina. Originally Roman women shared the binomial nomenclature of men; but over time the praenomen became less useful as a distinguishing element, and women's praenomina were gradually discarded, or replaced by informal names. By the end of the Republic, the majority of Roman women either did not have or did not use praenomina. Most women were called by their nomen alone, or by a combination of nomen and cognomen. Praenomina could still be given when necessary, and as with men's praenomina the practice survived well into imperial times, but the proliferation of personal cognomina eventually rendered women's praenomina obsolete.[1][2] In the later empire, members of the Roman aristocracy used several different schemes of assuming and inheriting nomina and cognomina, both to signify their rank, and to indicate their family and social connections. Some Romans came to be known by alternative names, or signia, and due to the lack of surviving epigraphic evidence, the full nomenclature of most Romans, even among the aristocracy, is seldom recorded.[2] Thus, although the three types of names referred to as the tria nomina existed throughout Roman history, the period during which the majority of citizens possessed exactly three names was relatively brief. Nevertheless, because most of the important individuals during the best-recorded periods of Roman history possessed all three names, the tria nomina remains the most familiar conception of the Roman name.[2] For a variety of reasons, the Roman nomenclature system broke down in the centuries following the collapse of imperial authority in the west. The praenomen had already become scarce in written sources during the fourth century, and by the fifth century it was retained only by the most conservative elements of the old Roman aristocracy, such as the Aurelii Symmachi. Over the course of the sixth century, as Roman institutions and social structures gradually fell away, the need to distinguish between nomina and cognomina likewise vanished. By the end of the seventh century, the people of Italy and western Europe had reverted to single names. But many of the names that had originated as part of the tria nomina were adapted to this usage, and survived into modern times.[1][2] Origin and development[edit] The Shepherd Faustulus Bringing Romulus and Remus to His Wife Nicolas Mignard, 1606–1668 As in other cultures, the early peoples of Italy probably used a single name, which later developed into the praenomen.[1] Marcus Terentius Varro wrote that the earliest Italians used simple names.[3] Names of this type could be honorific or aspirational, or might refer to deities, physical peculiarities, or circumstances of birth.[1] In this early period, the number of personal names must have been quite large; but with the development of additional names the number in widespread use dwindled.[1] By the early Republic, about three dozen Latin praenomina remained in use, some of which were already rare; about eighteen were used by the patricians.[4] Barely a dozen praenomina remained in general use under the Empire, although aristocratic families sometimes revived older praenomina, or created new ones from cognomina.[1] The development of the nomen as the second element of the Italic name cannot be attributed to a specific period or culture. From the earliest period it was common to both the Indo-European speaking Italic peoples and the Etruscans. The historian Livy relates the adoption of Silvius as a nomen by the kings of Alba Longa in honour of their ancestor, Silvius.[i][5] As part of Rome's foundation myth, this statement cannot be regarded as historical fact, but it does indicate the antiquity of the period to which the Romans themselves ascribed the adoption of hereditary surnames.[ii] In Latin, most nomina were formed by adding an adjectival suffix, usually -ius, to the stem of an existing word or name. Frequently this required a joining element, such as -e-, -id-, -il-, or -on-. Many common nomina arose as patronymic surnames; for instance, the nomen Marcius was derived from the praenomen Marcus, and originally signified Marci filius, "son of Marcus". In the same way, Sextius, Publilius, and Lucilius arose from the praenomina Sextus, Publius, and Lucius.[1][iii] This demonstrates that, much like later European surnames, the earliest nomina were not necessarily hereditary, but might be adopted and discarded at will, and changed from one generation to the next. The practice from which these patronymics arose also gave rise to the filiation, which in later times, once the nomen had become fixed, nearly always followed the nomen. Other nomina were derived from names that later came to be regarded as cognomina, such as Plancius from Plancus or Flavius from Flavus; or from place-names, such as Norbanus from Norba.[1] The binomial name consisting of praenomen and nomen eventually spread throughout Italy. Nomina from different languages and regions often have distinctive characteristics; Latin nomina tended to end in -ius, -us, -aius, -eius, -eus, or -aeus, while Oscan names frequently ended in -is or -iis; Umbrian names in -as, -anas, -enas, or -inas, and Etruscan names in -arna, -erna, -ena, -enna, -ina, or -inna. Oscan and Umbrian forms tend to be found in inscriptions; in Roman literature these names are often Latinized.[4] Many individuals added an additional surname, or cognomen, which helped to distinguish between members of larger families. Originally these were simply personal names, which might be derived from a person's physical features, personal qualities, occupation, place of origin, or even an object with which a person was associated. Some cognomina were derived from the circumstance of a person's adoption from one family into another, or were derived from foreign names, such as when a freedman received a Roman praenomen and nomen. Other cognomina commemorated important events associated with a person; a battle in which a man had fought (Regillensis), a town captured (Coriolanus); or a miraculous occurrence (Corvus). The late grammarians distinguished certain cognomina as agnomina.[1] Although originally a personal name, the cognomen frequently became hereditary, especially in large families, or gentes, in which they served to identify distinct branches, known as stirpes. Some Romans had more than one cognomen, and in aristocratic families it was not unheard of for individuals to have as many as three, of which some might be hereditary and some personal. These surnames were initially characteristic of patrician families, but over time cognomina were also acquired by the plebeians. However, a number of distinguished plebeian gentes, such as the Antonii and the Marii, were never divided into different branches, and in these families cognomina were the exception rather than the rule.[1] Cognomina are known from the beginning of the Republic, but were long regarded as informal names, and omitted from most official records before the second century BC. Later inscriptions commemorating the early centuries of the Republic supply these missing surnames, although the authenticity of some of them has been disputed. Under the Empire, however, the cognomen acquired great importance, and the number of cognomina assumed by the Roman aristocracy multiplied exponentially.[1] Adding to the complexity of aristocratic names was the practice of combining the full nomenclature of both one's paternal and maternal ancestors, resulting in some individuals appearing to have two or more complete names. Duplicative or politically undesirable names might be omitted, while the order of names might be rearranged to emphasize those giving the bearer the greatest prestige.[2] Following the promulgation of the Constitutio Antoniniana in AD 212, granting Roman citizenship to all free men living within the Roman Empire, the praenomen and nomen lost much of their distinguishing function, as all of the newly enfranchised citizens shared the name of Marcus Aurelius. The praenomen and sometimes the nomen gradually disappeared from view, crowded out by other names indicating the bearer's rank and social connections. Surviving inscriptions from the fifth century rarely provide a citizen's full nomenclature.[1][2] In the final centuries of the Empire, the traditional nomenclature was sometimes replaced by alternate names, known as signa. In the course of the sixth century, as central authority collapsed and Roman institutions disappeared, the complex forms of Roman nomenclature were abandoned altogether, and the people of Italy and western Europe reverted to single names. Modern European nomenclature developed independently of the Roman model during the Middle Ages and the Renaissance. However, many modern names are derived from Roman originals.[1] Tria nomina[edit] The three types of names that have come to be regarded as quintessentially Roman were the praenomen, nomen, and cognomen. Together, these were referred to as the tria nomina. Although not all Romans possessed three names, the practice of using multiple names having different functions was a defining characteristic of Roman culture that distinguished citizens from foreigners. Praenomen[edit] Main article: Praenomen A Roman child. In the Peristyle (1874), John William Waterhouse, 1849–1917 The praenomen was a true personal name, chosen by a child's parents, and bestowed on the dies lustricius, or "day of lustration", a ritual purification performed on the eighth day after the birth of a girl, or the ninth day after the birth of a boy.[iv] Normally all of the children in a family would have different praenomina.[v] Although there was no law restricting the use of specific praenomina,[vi] the choice of the parents was usually governed by custom and family tradition. An eldest son was usually named after his father, and younger sons were named after their father's brothers or other male ancestors. In this way, the same praenomina were passed down in a family from one generation to the next. Not only did this serve to emphasize the continuity of a family across many generations, but the selection of praenomina also distinguished the customs of one gens from another. The patrician gentes in particular tended to limit the number of praenomina that they used far more than the plebeians, which was a way of reinforcing the exclusiveness of their social status.[8] Of course, there were many exceptions to these general practices. A son might be named in honour of one of his maternal relatives, thus bringing a new name into the gens.[9] Because some gentes made regular use of only three or four praenomina, new names might appear whenever a family had more than three or four sons. Furthermore, a number of the oldest and most influential patrician families made a habit of choosing unusual names; in particular the Fabii, Aemilii, Furii, Claudii, Cornelii, and Valerii all used praenomina that were uncommon amongst the patricians, or which had fallen out of general use. In the last two centuries of the Republic, and under the early Empire, it was fashionable for aristocratic families to revive older praenomina.[1] About three dozen Latin praenomina were in use at the beginning of the Republic, although only about eighteen were common. This number fell gradually, until by the first century AD, about a dozen praenomina remained in widespread use, with a handful of others used by particular families.[4] The origin and use of praenomina was a matter of curiosity to the Romans themselves; in De Praenominibus, Probus discusses a number of older praenomina and their meanings.[3] Most praenomina were regularly abbreviated, and rarely written in full.[4] Other praenomina were used by the Oscan, Umbrian, and Etruscan-speaking peoples of Italy, and many of these also had regular abbreviations. Lists of praenomina used by the various people of Italy, together with their usual abbreviations, can be found at praenomen. Roman men were usually known by their praenomina to members of their family and household, clientes and close friends; but outside of this circle, they might be called by their nomen, cognomen, or any combination of praenomen, nomen, and cognomen that was sufficient to distinguish them from other men with similar names.[4] In the literature of the Republic, and on all formal occasions, such as when a senator was called upon to speak, it was customary to address a citizen by praenomen and nomen; or, if this were insufficient to distinguish him from other members of the gens, by praenomen and cognomen.[1][4] In imperial times, the praenomen became increasingly confused by the practices of the aristocracy. The emperors usually prefixed Imperator to their names as a praenomen, while at the same time retaining their own praenomina; but because most of the early emperors were legally adopted by their predecessors, and formally assumed new names, even these were subject to change. Several members of the Julio-Claudian dynasty exchanged their original praenomina for cognomina, or received cognomina in place of praenomina at birth. An emperor might emancipate or enfranchise large groups of people at once, all of whom would automatically receive the emperor's praenomen and nomen. Yet another common practice beginning in the first century AD was to give multiple sons the same praenomen, and distinguish them using different cognomina; by the second century this was becoming the rule, rather than the exception. Another confusing practice was the addition of the full nomenclature of maternal ancestors to the basic tria nomina, so that a man might appear to have two praenomina, one occurring in the middle of his name.[2] Under the weight of these practices and others, the utility of the praenomen to distinguish between men continued to decline, until only the force of tradition prevented its utter abandonment. Over the course of the third century, praenomina become increasingly scarce in written records, and from the fourth century onward their appearance becomes exceptional. The descendants of those who had been granted citizenship by the Constitutio Antoniniana seem to have dispensed with praenomina altogether, and by the end of the western empire, only the oldest Roman families continued to use them.[1][2] Nomen[edit] The nomen gentilicium, or "gentile name",[vii] designated a Roman citizen as a member of a gens. A gens, which may be translated as "race", "family", or "clan", constituted an extended Roman family, all of whom shared the same nomen, and claimed descent from a common ancestor. Particularly in the early Republic, the gens functioned as a state within the state, observing its own sacred rites, and establishing private laws, which were binding on its members, although not on the community as a whole.[10] Cognomen[edit] Main article: Cognomen Quintus Fabius Maximus Verrucosus, surnamed "Cunctator". Maximus was the branch of the Fabia gens to which he belonged; Verrucosus was a personal cognomen referring to a wart above his upper lip; Cunctator a cognomen ex virtute referring to his delaying strategy against Hannibal. Statue at Schönbrunn Palace, Vienna The cognomen, the third element of the tria nomina, began as an additional personal name. It was not unique to Rome, but Rome was where the cognomen flourished, as the development of the gens and the gradual decline of the praenomen as a useful means of distinguishing between individuals made the cognomen a useful means of identifying both individuals and whole branches of Rome's leading families. In the early years of the Republic, some aristocratic Romans had as many as three cognomina, some of which were hereditary, while others were personal.[1] Like the nomen, cognomina could arise from any number of factors: personal characteristics, habits, occupations, places of origin, heroic exploits, and so forth. One class of cognomina consisted largely of archaic praenomina that were seldom used by the later Republic, although as cognomina these names persisted throughout Imperial times.[11] Many cognomina had unusual terminations for Latin names, ending in -a, -o, or -io, and their meanings were frequently obscure, even in antiquity; this seems to emphasize the manner in which many cognomina originally arose from nicknames. The -ius termination typical of Latin nomina was generally not used for cognomina until the fourth century AD, making it easier to distinguish between nomina and cognomina until the final centuries of the western empire.[2] Unlike the nomen, which was passed down unchanged from father to son, cognomina could appear and disappear almost at will. They were not normally chosen by the persons who bore them, but were earned or bestowed by others, which may account for the wide variety of unflattering names that were used as cognomina. Doubtless some cognomina were used ironically, while others continued in use largely because, whatever their origin, they were useful for distinguishing among individuals and between branches of large families. New cognomina were coined and came into fashion throughout Roman history.[1] Under the Empire, the number of cognomina increased dramatically. Where once only the most noble patrician houses used multiple surnames, Romans of all backgrounds and social standing might bear several cognomina. By the third century, this had become the norm amongst freeborn Roman citizens. The question of how to classify different cognomina led the grammarians of the fourth and fifth centuries to designate some of them as agnomina.[4] For most of the Republic, the usual manner of distinguishing individuals was through the binomial form of praenomen and nomen. But as the praenomen lost its value as a distinguishing name, and gradually faded into obscurity, its former role was assumed by the versatile cognomen, and the typical manner of identifying individuals came to be by nomen and cognomen; essentially one form of binomial nomenclature was replaced by another, over the course of several centuries. The very lack of regularity that allowed the cognomen to be used as either a personal or a hereditary surname became its strength in imperial times; as a hereditary surname, a cognomen could be used to identify an individual's connection with other noble families, either by descent, or later by association. Individual cognomina could also be used to distinguish between members of the same family; even as siblings came to share the same praenomen, they bore different cognomina, some from the paternal line, and others from their maternal ancestors.[2] Although the nomen was a required element of Roman nomenclature down to the end of the western empire, its usefulness as a distinguishing name declined throughout imperial times, as an increasingly large portion of the population bore nomina such as Flavius or Aurelius, which had been granted en masse to newly enfranchised citizens. As a result, by the third century the cognomen became the most important element of the Roman name, and frequently the only one that was useful for distinguishing between individuals. In the later empire, the proliferation of cognomina was such that the full nomenclature of most individuals was not recorded, and in many cases the only names surviving in extant records are cognomina.[2] By the sixth century, traditional Roman cognomina were frequently prefixed by a series of names with Christian religious significance. As Roman institutions vanished, and the distinction between nomen and cognomen ceased to have any practical importance, the complex system of cognomina that developed under the later empire faded away. The people of the western empire reverted to single names, which were indistinguishable from the cognomina that they replaced; many former praenomina and nomina also survived in this way.[2] Agnomen[edit] Main article: Agnomen The proliferation of cognomina in the later centuries of the Empire led some grammarians to classify certain types as agnomina. This class included two main types of cognomen: the cognomen ex virtute, and cognomina that were derived from nomina, to indicate the parentage of Romans who had been adopted from one gens into another. Although these names had existed throughout Roman history, it was only in this late period that they were distinguished from other cognomina.[4] Cognomina ex virtute[edit] The cognomen ex virtute was a surname derived from some virtuous or heroic episode attributed to the bearer. Roman history is filled with individuals who obtained cognomina as a result of their exploits: Aulus Postumius Albus Regillensis, who commanded the Roman army at the Battle of Lake Regillus; Gaius Marcius Coriolanus, who captured the city of Corioli; Marcus Valerius Corvus, who defeated a giant Gaul in single combat, aided by a raven; Titus Manlius Torquatus, who likewise defeated a Gaulish giant, and took his name from the torque that he claimed as a prize; Publius Cornelius Scipio Africanus, who carried the Second Punic War to Africa, and defeated Hannibal. Interestingly, the most famous examples of this class of cognomen come from the period of the Republic, centuries before the concept of the agnomen was formulated. Adoptive cognomina[edit] Main article: Adoption in ancient Rome Adoption was a common and formal process in Roman culture. Its chief purpose had nothing to do with providing homes for children; it was about ensuring the continuity of family lines that might otherwise become extinct. In early Rome, this was especially important for the patricians, who enjoyed tremendous status and privilege compared with the plebeians. Because few families were admitted to the patriciate after the expulsion of the kings, while the number of plebeians continually grew, the patricians continually struggled to preserve their wealth and influence. A man who had no sons to inherit his property and preserve his family name would adopt one of the younger sons from another family. In time, as the plebeians also acquired wealth and gained access to the offices of the Roman state, they too came to participate in the Roman system of adoption.[12][13] Since the primary purpose of adoption was to preserve the name and status of the adopter, an adopted son would usually assume both the praenomen and nomen of his adoptive father, together with any hereditary cognomina, just as an eldest son would have done. However, adoption did not result in the complete abandonment of the adopted son's birth name. The son's original nomen (or occasionally cognomen) would become the basis of a new surname, formed by adding the derivative suffix -anus or -inus to the stem. Thus, when a son of Lucius Aemilius Paullus was adopted by Publius Cornelius Scipio, he became Publius Cornelius Scipio Aemilianus; in his will, the dictator Gaius Julius Caesar adopted his grandnephew, Gaius Octavius, who became known as Gaius Julius Caesar Octavianus.[1][4][12] Filiation[edit] Apart from the praenomen, the filiation was the oldest element of the Roman name. Even before the development of the nomen as a hereditary surname, it was customary to use the name of a person's father as a means of distinguishing him or her from others with the same personal name, like a patronymic; thus Lucius, the son of Marcus would be Lucius, Marci filius; Paulla, the daughter of Quintus, would be Paulla, Quinti filia. Many nomina were derived in the same way, and most praenomina have at least one corresponding nomen, such as Lucilius, Marcius, Publilius, Quinctius, or Servilius. These are known as patronymic surnames, because they are derived from the name of the original bearer's father. Even after the development of the nomen and cognomen, filiation remained a useful means of distinguishing between members of a large family.[4]   "Dedicated by the emperor Caesar, son of the divine Marcus Antoninus Pius, brother of the divine Commodus, grandson of the divine Antoninus Pius, great-grandson of the divine Hadrian, great-great-grandson of the divine Trajan, conqueror of Parthia, great-great-great-grandson of the divine Nerva, Lucius Septimius Severus Pius Pertinax Augustus Arabicus Adiabenicus, father of his country, Pontifex Maximus, holding the tribunician power for the fourth year, in the eighth year of his imperium, consul for the second time; and Marcus Aurelius Antoninus Caesar" Filiations were normally written between the nomen and any cognomina, and abbreviated using the typical abbreviations for praenomina, followed by f. for filius or filia, and sometimes n. for nepos (grandson) or neptis (granddaughter). Thus, the inscription S. Postumius A. f. P. n. Albus Regillensis means "Spurius Postumius Albus Regillensis, of Aulus the son, of Publius the grandson". "Tiberius Aemilius Mamercinus, the son of Lucius and grandson of Mamercus" would be written Ti. Aemilius L. f. Mam. n. Mamercinus. The more formal the writing, the more generations might be included; a great-grandchild would be pron. or pronep. for pronepos or proneptis, a great-great-grandchild abn. or abnep. for abnepos or abneptis, and a great-great-great-grandchild adnepos or adneptis.[viii] However, these forms are rarely included as part of a name, except on the grandest of monumental inscriptions.[14] The filiation sometimes included the name of the mother, in which case gnatus[ix] would follow the mother's name, instead of filius or filia.[x] This is especially common in families of Etruscan origin. The names of married women were sometimes followed by the husband's name and uxor for "wife". N. Fabius Q. f. M. n. Furia gnatus Maximus means "Numerius Fabius Maximus, son of Quintus, grandson of Marcus, born of Furia",[xi] while Claudia L. Valeri uxor would be "Claudia, wife of Lucius Valerius". Slaves and freedmen also possessed filiations, although in this case the person referred to is usually the slave's owner, rather than his or her father. The abbreviations here include s. for servus or serva and l. for libertus or liberta. A slave might have more than one owner, in which case the names could be given serially. In some cases the owner's nomen or cognomen was used instead of or in addition to the praenomen. The liberti of women sometimes used an inverted "C", signifying the feminine praenomen Gaia, here used generically to mean any woman; and there are a few examples of an inverted "M", although it is not clear whether this was used generically, or specifically for the feminine praenomen Marca or Marcia.[11] An example of the filiation of slaves and freedmen would be: Alexander Corneli L. s., "Alexander, slave of Lucius Cornelius", who upon his emancipation would probably become L. Cornelius L. l. Alexander, "Lucius Cornelius Alexander, freedman of Lucius"; it was customary for a freedman to take the praenomen of his former owner, if he did not already have one, and to use his original personal name as a cognomen. Another example might be Salvia Pompeia Cn. Ɔ. l., "Salvia Pompeia, freedwoman of Gnaeus (Pompeius) and Gaia"; here Gaia is used generically, irrespective of whether Pompeius' wife was actually named Gaia. A freedman of the emperor might have the filiation Aug. l., Augusti libertus. Although filiation was common throughout the history of the Republic and well into imperial times, no law governed its use or inclusion in writing. It was used by custom and for convenience, but could be ignored or discarded, as it suited the needs of the writer. Tribe[edit] Main article: Roman tribe From the beginning of the Roman Republic, all citizens were enumerated in one of the tribes making up the comitia tributa, or "tribal assembly". This was the most democratic of Rome's three main legislative assemblies of the Roman Republic, in that all citizens could participate on an equal basis, without regard to wealth or social status. Over time, its decrees, known as plebi scita, or "plebiscites" became binding on the whole Roman people. Although much of the assembly's authority was usurped by the emperors, membership in a tribe remained an important part of Roman citizenship, so that the name of the tribe came to be incorporated into a citizen's full nomenclature.[15][16][17] The number of tribes varied over time; tradition ascribed the institution of thirty tribes to Servius Tullius, the sixth King of Rome, but ten of these were destroyed at the beginning of the Republic. Several tribes were added between 387 and 241 BC, as large swaths of Italy came under Roman control, bringing the total number of tribes to thirty-five; except for a brief experiment at the end of the Social War in 88 BC, this number remained fixed. The nature of the tribes was mainly geographic, rather than ethnic; inhabitants of Rome were, in theory, assigned to one of the four "urban" tribes, while the territory beyond the city was allocated to the "rural" or "rustic" tribes.[15][16] Geography was not the sole determining factor in one's tribus; at times efforts were made to assign freedmen to the four urban tribes, thus concentrating their votes and limiting their influence on the comitia tributa. Perhaps for similar reasons, when large numbers of provincials gained the franchise, certain rural tribes were preferred for their enrollment. Citizens did not normally change tribes when they moved from one region to another; but the censors had the power to punish a citizen by expelling him from one of the rural tribes and assigning him to one of the urban tribes. In later periods, most citizens were enrolled in tribes without respect to geography.[16] Precisely when it became common to include the name of a citizen's tribus as part of his full nomenclature is uncertain. The name of the tribe normally follows the filiation and precedes any cognomina, suggesting that it occurred before the cognomen was recognized as a formal part of the Roman name; so probably no later than the second century BC. However, in both writing and inscriptions, the tribus is found with much less frequency than other parts of the name; so the custom of including it does not seem to have been deeply ingrained in Roman practice. As with the filiation, it was common to abbreviate the name of the tribe. For the names of the thirty-five tribes and their abbreviations, see Roman tribe.[15] Women's names[edit] Main article: Naming conventions for women in ancient Rome A Roman woman, attired as a Priestess of Vesta, performing sacred rites. Invocation Frederic Leighton (1830–1896) In the earliest period, the binomial nomenclature of praenomen and nomen that developed throughout Italy was shared by both men and women.[1] Most praenomina had both masculine and feminine forms, although a number of praenomina common to women were seldom or never used by men. Just as men's praenomina, women's names were regularly abbreviated instead of being written in full.[18] A list of women's praenomina can be found at praenomen. For a variety of reasons, women's praenomina became neglected over the course of Roman history, and by the end of the Republic, most women did not have or did not use praenomina. They did not disappear entirely, nor were Roman women bereft of personal names; but for most of Roman history women were known chiefly by their nomina or cognomina.[1] The first of these reasons is probably that the praenomen itself lost much of its original utility following the adoption of hereditary surnames. The number of praenomina commonly used by both men and women declined throughout Roman history. For men, who might hold public office or serve in the military, the praenomen remained an important part of the legal name. But, as in other ancient societies, Roman women played little role in public life, so the factors that resulted in the continuation of men's praenomina did not exist for women. Another factor was probably that the praenomen was not usually necessary to distinguish between women within the family. Because a Roman woman did not change her nomen when she married, her nomen alone was usually sufficient to distinguish her from every other member of the family. As Latin names had distinctive masculine and feminine forms, the nomen was sufficient to distinguish a daughter from both of her parents and all of her brothers. Thus, there was no need for a personal name unless there were multiple sisters in the same household.[2] When this occurred, praenomina could be and frequently were used to distinguish between sisters. However, it was also common to identify sisters using a variety of names, some of which could be used as either praenomina or cognomina. For example, if Publius Servilius had two daughters, they would typically be referred to as Servilia Major and Servilia Minor. If there were more daughters, the eldest might be called Servilia Prima or Servilia Maxima;[xii] younger daughters as Servilia Secunda, Tertia, Quarta, etc. All of these names could be used as praenomina, preceding the nomen, but common usage from the later Republic onward was to treat them as personal cognomina; when these names appear in either position, it is frequently impossible to determine whether they were intended as praenomina or cognomina.[11][18] Although women's praenomina were infrequently used in the later Republic, they continued to be used, when needed, into imperial times. Among the other peoples of Italy, women's praenomina continued to be used regularly until the populace was thoroughly Romanized. In the Etruscan culture, where women held a markedly higher social status than at Rome or in other ancient societies, inscriptions referring to women nearly always include praenomina.[18] Avlia L.F. Secunda Aulia Secunda, daughter of Lucius Most Roman women were known by their nomina, with such distinction as described above for older and younger siblings. If further distinction were needed, she could be identified as a particular citizen's daughter or wife. For instance, Cicero refers to a woman as Annia P. Anni senatoris filia, which means "Annia, daughter of Publius Annius, the senator".[2] However, toward the end of the Republic, as hereditary cognomina came to be regarded as proper names, a woman might be referred to by her cognomen instead, or by a combination of nomen and cognomen; the daughter of Lucius Caecilius Metellus was usually referred to as Caecilia Metella. Sometimes these cognomina were given diminutive forms, such as Agrippina from the masculine Agrippa, or Drusilla from Drusus.[1] In imperial times, other, less formal names were sometimes used to distinguish between women with similar names. Still later, Roman women, like men, adopted signa, or alternative names, in place of their Roman names. With the fall of the western empire in the fifth century, the last traces of the distinctive Italic nomenclature system began to disappear, and women too reverted to single names. Foreign names[edit] As Roman territory expanded beyond Italy, many foreigners obtained Roman citizenship, and adopted Roman names. Often these were discharged auxiliary soldiers, or the leaders of annexed towns and peoples. Customarily a newly enfranchised citizen would adopt the praenomen and nomen of his patron; that is, the person who had adopted or manumitted him, or otherwise procured his citizenship. But many such individuals retained a portion of their original names, usually in the form of cognomina. This was especially true for citizens of Greek origin. A name such as T. Flavius Aristodemus or Gaius Julius Hyginus would be typical of such persons, although in form these names are not distinguishable from those of freedmen.[xiii][1] The Constitutio Antoniniana promulgated by Caracalla in AD 212 was perhaps the most far-reaching of many imperial decrees enfranchising large numbers of non-citizens living throughout the empire. It extended citizenship to all free inhabitants of the empire, all of whom thus received the name Marcus Aurelius, after the emperor's praenomen and nomen. The result was that vast numbers of individuals who had never possessed praenomina or nomina formally shared the same names. In turn, many of the "new Romans" promptly discarded their praenomina, and ignored their nomina except when required by formality. As a result, the cognomina adopted by these citizens, often including their original non-Latin names, became the most important part of their nomenclature.[2] Imperial names[edit] During the Republic, a person's names were usually static and predictable, unless he were adopted into a new family or obtained a new surname. In imperial times, however, names became highly variable and subject to change. Perhaps no names were more variable than those of the emperors. For example, the first emperor, known conventionally as Augustus, began life as C. Octavius C. f., or Gaius Octavius, the son of Gaius Octavius. His ancestors had borne the same name for at least four generations.[19] Although the Octavii were an old and distinguished plebeian family, the gens was not divided into stirpes and had no hereditary cognomina; Octavius' father had put down a slave revolt at Thurii and was sometimes given the surname Thurinus (a cognomen ex virtute), but this name was not passed down to the son. At the age of eighteen in 44 BC, Octavius was nominated magister equitum by his granduncle, Gaius Julius Caesar, who held the office of dictator. On the Ides of March, Caesar was assassinated, without legitimate children; but in his will he adopted his nephew, who then became C. Julius C. f. Caesar Octavianus, "Gaius Julius Caesar Octavianus, son of Gaius". Thus far, his name follows the Republican model, becoming that of his adoptive father, followed by his original nomen in the form of an agnomen. Two years later, Caesar was deified by the Roman Senate, and Octavian, as he was then known, was styled Divi f., "son of the divine (Caesar)", instead of C. f.. Still later, after having been acclaimed Imperator by the troops under his command, Octavian assumed this title as an additional praenomen, becoming Imp. C. Julius Divi f. Caesar Octavianus; in some inscriptions his original praenomen is discarded altogether. In 27 BC, the Senate granted him the title of Augustus, which would ever after be affixed as a cognomen to the names of the Roman emperors. A similar pattern was followed by Augustus' heirs. The emperor's stepson and eventual successor was born Tiberius Claudius Nero; after his adoption by the emperor, he became Tiberius Julius Caesar (retaining his original praenomen). His brother, born Decimus Claudius Nero, subsequently became Nero Claudius Drusus, exchanging his original praenomen for his paternal cognomen, and assuming a new cognomen from his maternal grandfather. Other members of the Julio-Claudian dynasty used praenomina such as Drusus and Germanicus. In subsequent generations, all reigning emperors assumed Imperator as an additional praenomen (usually without foregoing their original praenomina), and Augustus as a cognomen. Caesar came to be used as a cognomen designating an heir apparent; and for the first two centuries of the empire, most emperors were adopted by their predecessors. The result was that each emperor bore a series of names that had more to do with the previous emperor than the names with which he had been born. They added new cognomina as they fought and conquered enemies and new lands, and their filiations recorded their descent from a series of gods. As the names of the emperors themselves changed, so did the names of the members of their families. Later development[edit] During the Empire, a variety of new naming conventions developed which, while differing, were internally coherent.[20] Binary nomenclature and polyonymy[edit] Under the "High Empire", the new aristocracy began adopting two or more nomina – a practice which has been termed 'binary nomenclature'.[21] This arose out of a desire to incorporate distinguished maternal ancestry in a name or, in order to inherit property, an heir was required by a will to incorporate the testator's name into his own name.[22] For example, the suffect consul of AD 118/9, Gaius Bruttius Praesens Lucius Fulvius Rusticus, has a name which is composed of two standard sets of tria nomina: he was the natural son of a Lucius Bruttius, and added the nomina of his maternal grandfather, Lucius Fulvius Rusticus, to his paternal nomina.[22] In order to reflect an illustrious pedigree or other connections, the aristocracy expanded the binary nomenclature concept to include other nomina from an individual's paternal and maternal ancestry.[22] There was no limit to the number of names which could be added in this way (known as polyonomy), and, for example, the consul of 169 AD, (usually called Q. Sosius Priscus) had thirty-eight names comprising fourteen sets of nomina reflecting a complex pedigree stretching back three generations.[22] Cognomen replaces praenomen[edit] The praenomen, even under the classic system, had never been particularly distinctive because of the limited number of praenomina available.[23] Between the late Republic and the second century AD, the praenomen gradually became less used and eventually disappeared altogether.[21] Even among the senatorial aristocracy it became a rarity by about 300 AD.[21] In part this came about through a tendency for the same praenomen to be given to all males of a family, thereby fossilizing a particular preaenomen/nomen combination and making the praenomen even less distinctive e.g. all males in the emperor Vespasian's family (including all his sons) had the praenomen/nomen combination Titus Flavius:[24] Titus Flavius Petro Titus Flavius Sabinus (married Vespasia Polla) Titus Flavius Sabinus Titus Flavius Vespasianus emperor Vespasian (married Flavia Domitilla) Titus Flavius Sabinus Titus Flavius Clemens Titus Flavius Vespasianus emperor Titus Titus Flavius Domitianus emperor Domitian The cognomen, as in Vespasian's family, then assumed the distinguishing function for individuals; where this happened, the cognomen replaced the praenomen in intimate address.[24] The result was that two names remained in use for formal public address but instead of praenomen + nomen, it became nomen + cognomen.[24] Edict of Caracalla[edit] With the Constitutio Antoniniana in 212, the emperor Caracalla granted Roman citizenship to all free inhabitants of the empire. It had long been the expectation that when a non-Roman acquired citizenship he, as part of his enfranchisement, took on a Roman name.[25] With the mass enfranchisement of 212, the new citizens adopted the nomen "Aurelius" in recognition of Caracalla's beneficence[24] (the emperor's full name was Marcus Aurelius Severus Antoninus Augustus, with Aurelius as the nomen). "Aurelius" quickly became the most common nomen in the east and the second most common (after "Julius") in the west.[26] The change in the origins of the new governing elite that assumed control of the empire from the end of the third century can be seen in their names: seven of the eleven emperors between Gallienus and Diocletian (Claudius Gothicus, Quintillus, Probus, Carus, Carinus, Numerian and Maximian) bore the name "Marcus Aurelius"[27] Although praenomina were not adopted by the new citizens, reflecting the pre-existing decline amongst "old" Romans,[25] in the west the new names were formulated on the same basis as the existing Roman practices.[26] In the east, however, the new citizens formulated their names by placing "Aurelius" before versions of their non-Roman given name and a patronymic.[26] Ultimately, the ubiquity of "Aurelius" meant that it could not function as a true distinguishing nomen, and became primarily just a badge of citizenship added to any name.[26] Traditional nomen replaced[edit] Although a nomen would long be required for official purposes, and, in isolated corners of the empire and in parts of Italy, its usage would persist into the seventh century, the nomen was generally omitted from the name (even of emperors) by the third century.[28] Two factors encouraged its frequent non-use. Firstly, the cognomen increasingly became the distinguishing name and general name of address.[28] As a result, "New Romans" and, under their influence, "old Romans" too, either dropped the nomen from their name[28] or, in some cases, treated the nomen as a praenomen.[27] Secondly, with the nomen becoming an increasingly fossilized formality, non-Italian families, even those who had acquired citizenship and a nomen prior to 212, began to ignore their nomen.[28] When a nomen was required for official purposes they would simply put the default nomen of "Aurelius" in front of their name, rather than use their actual nomen.[28] See also[edit] Ancient Greek personal names Latinisation of names – Practice of rendering a non-Latin name in a Latin style Notes[edit] ^ Livy refers to this as a cognomen, or "surname", which in later Roman practice was the third element of the Roman tria nomina; but it must be remembered that the word nomen simply means "name", and before the adoption of a second name, this is how the praenomen would have been called; thus, the first surnames adopted would have been known as cognomina before their gradually-increasing importance caused the word nomen to refer to them, while the original personal name became known as the praenomen, or "forename".[5] ^ Although a few individuals mentioned in relation to the period of and before Rome's legendary foundation in the eighth century BC are known by only a single name, it is equally difficult to discern which of these represent actual historical figures, and if so, whether their names were accurately remembered by the historians who recorded these myths centuries later. Romulus and Remus, together with their foster-father, the herdsman Faustulus, are among those easily remembered; but even supposing that Romulus and Remus are the names of historical persons, they belonged, in theory, to the royal house of the Silvii; or they might have borne no surname because they were said to have been fathered by Mars himself. Meanwhile, Faustulus may represent a mythical personage interjected into Rome's foundation legend; although it may be noted that his name is a diminutive of the Latin praenomen Faustus. Almost all other persons mentioned as part of the traditions surrounding Romulus as the first King of Rome have both praenomen and nomen.[4][6] ^ So common was this practice that nearly all Latin praenomina gave rise to patronymic nomina, including many that were uncommon in historical times. ^ In his treatise, De Praenominibus, Probus cites Quintus Mucius Scaevola, an authority on Roman law, for the proposition that boys did not receive a praenomen before assuming the Toga virilis, signifying the transition into adulthood, and that girls did not receive a praenomen before marriage.[3] But this appears to refer to some sort of formal ceremony in which a praenomen was granted or confirmed, rather than the original act of naming. The funerary inscriptions of many Romans who died in childhood conclusively demonstrate that Roman children had praenomina.[4] ^ As usual, there were exceptions to this policy as well; for instance, among the Fabii Maximi, several brothers in a single family were all named Quintus; in the first century AD, the Flavii Sabini all bore the praenomen Titus, but were distinguished in each generation by the use of different cognomina. Also, because praenomina had grammatical gender, a brother and sister could have the same praenomen, in masculine and feminine forms, and still be easily distinguished. ^ A few exceptions are noted by the ancient historians; for example, supposedly no member of the Junia gens was named Titus or Tiberius after two brothers of this name, sons of the consul Lucius Junius Brutus, were put to death for plotting to restore the Roman monarchy. The Manlia gens is said to have forbidden the use of Marcus after the condemnation of Marcus Manlius Capitolinus;[7] and after the death of Marcus Antonius and the execution of his son, it was decreed that none of the Antonii should ever again be named Marcus. However, all of these supposed prohibitions were subsequently broken. ^ Although this use of the term gentile has the same origin as the term used to distinguish non-Jews from the Jewish population, its meaning is purely civil, and has nothing to do with ethnic or religious identity; in this use it simply refers to a member of a gens, distinguished by his or her surname, and in this sense the term gentile name is used today without any religious connotation, despite (or perhaps because of) the use of Christian name to refer to personal names. In this sense, Romanized Jews could also be gentiles, and gentiles could be Jewish! This is also the origin of the term gentleman; the association of gentlemen with courtesy developed later. ^ Also spelled atnepos and atneptis. ^ Also spelled natus; this could be abbreviated gn., gnat., or, perhaps confusingly, n. ^ Evidently there were exceptions to this as well. CIL ii. 4566 gives the name Fabia Domitia Ɔ. f. Secunda, in which Ɔ. f. can only be read "Gaiae filia" (the use of an inverted C. for "Gaia" was common in the filiations of freedmen, but apparently not restricted to them; see below); this may be the same woman referred to as Fabia Domitia D. f. Secunda, CIL ii. 1806, in the latter case giving her father's name. Both inscriptions are from Roman Spain, and are also notable for the doubled nomen and for the cognomen Secunda, which in this case is really a praenomen placed after the filiation, a common practice in Roman women's names of this period. ^ Note that while the names of the father and grandfather are genitive (Quinti filius, Marci nepos), the mother's name is ablative; the translation "born of" is simply idiomatic in English. "Born to" would also be idiomatic, but could imply the dative case. ^ However, the eldest daughter, who might have been called by her nomen alone for several years, might continue to be so called even after the birth of younger sisters; in this case only the younger sisters might receive distinctive personal names. ^ In such cases, the filiation, if present, would indicate if someone were a freedman; but in these particular instances the nomina suggest citizens of provincial origin, who have been enfranchised by imperial decree. References[edit] ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z Oxford Classical Dictionary, 2nd Ed. (1970), "Names, Personal." ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Benet Salway, "What's in a Name? A Survey of Roman Onomastic Practice from c. 700 B.C. to A.D. 700", in Journal of Roman Studies, vol. 84, pp. 124–145 (1994). ^ a b c Gaius Titius Probus, De Praenominibus, epitome by Julius Paris. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Harper's Dictionary of Classical Literature and Antiquities, Second Edition, Harry Thurston Peck, Editor (1897), "Nomen." ^ a b Titus Livius, Ab Urbe Condita i. 3. ^ Titus Livius, Ab Urbe Condita i. 4–16. ^ Titus Livius, Ab Urbe Condita vi. 20. ^ Realencyclopädie der Classischen Altertumswissenschaft. ^ Sextus Pompeius Festus, epitome of Marcus Verrius Flaccus, De Verborum Significatu, s.v. "Numerius." ^ Oxford Classical Dictionary, 2nd Ed. (1970), "Gens." ^ a b c George Davis Chase, "The Origin of Roman Praenomina", in Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, vol. VIII (1897). ^ a b Harper's Dictionary of Classical Literature and Antiquities, Second Edition, Harry Thurston Peck, Editor (1897), "Adoption." ^ Oxford Classical Dictionary, 2nd Ed. (1970), "Adoption." ^ James Chidester Egbert, Jr., Introduction to the Study of Latin Inscriptions (American Book Company, 1896). ^ a b c Harper's Dictionary of Classical Literature and Antiquities, Second Edition, Harry Thurston Peck, Editor (1897), "Tribus." ^ a b c Oxford Classical Dictionary, 2nd Ed. (1970), "Tribus." ^ Harper's Dictionary of Classical Literature and Antiquities, Second Edition, Harry Thurston Peck, Editor (1897), "Comitia." ^ a b c Mika Kajava [fi], Roman Female Praenomina: Studies in the Nomenclature of Roman Women (1994), ISBN 951-96902-1-2 ^ CIL VI, 41023 ^ Salway, p.145 ^ a b c Salway, p.131 ^ a b c d Salway, p.132 ^ Flower, Harriet (ed.) (2004-01-19). The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Republic. p. 119. ISBN 978-0-521-00390-2.CS1 maint: extra text: authors list (link) ^ a b c d Salway, p.130 ^ a b Salway, p.133 ^ a b c d Salway, p.134 ^ a b Salway, p.136 ^ a b c d e Salway, p.135 Bibliography[edit] Salway, Benet (1994). "What's in a Name? A Survey of Roman Onomastic Practice from c. 700 B.C. to A.D. 700" (PDF). Journal of Roman Studies. 84: 124–145. doi:10.2307/300873. Cambridge Latin Course, University of Cambridge Press 2004, ISBN 0-521-78230-9 Liberati, Anna Maria and Bourbon, Fabio (2005), Ancient Rome, Barnes and Noble Press, ISBN 0-7607-6234-1 External links[edit] Roman Names Names of Byzantine Romans in Turkish v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films v t e Personal names and anthroponymy Personal identity Personal name Given name Surname Patrilineal/Matrilineal Affixes Nobiliary particle By sequence First name Middle name Last name By trait Diminutive Double-barrelled Eponymic Matronymic Metonymic Mononymic Occupational name Patronymic Surname Sobriquet Teknonymic Toponymic Patrial name Unisex By life situation Aptronym Code name Maiden and married names Necronym Posthumous name Temple name Placeholder name Notname Regnal name Slave name Pseudonyms (list) Art name Bugō Nicknames list Hypocorism Nom de guerre Pen name Heteronym Ring name Shikona Stage name List of stage names List of one-word stage names Username By culture Surnames by country East Asian Amami Chinese Courtesy Hongkongese Japanese Okinawan Korean Manchu Mongolian Taiwanese aboriginal Tibetan Vietnamese Muslim world Albanian Arabic Azerbaijani Bangladeshi Indonesian Balinese Chinese Javanese Malaysian Pakistani Sindhi Pashtun Persian Somali Tatar Turkish Oceania Australian Aboriginal Fijian Hawaiian Māori Sub-Saharan Africa Ashanti Democratic Republic of the Congo Ethiopian and Eritrean Ewe Ghanaian Igbo Yoruba Zimbabwean Western world/Christian World Armenian Basque Celtic Cornish Irish Manx Scottish Welsh Finnish French Georgian Germanic Dutch English American African-American Canadian German Icelandic Scandinavian Swedish Greek Ancient Greek Cypriot Hungarian Italian Kalmyk Latvian Lithuanian Portuguese Roman Praenomen Nomen Cognomen Agnomen Romanian Slavic Bulgarian Croatian Czech Eastern Slavic Belarusian Ukrainian Macedonian Polish Serbian Slovak Spanish Hispanic America Sakha Greater India/Southeast Asia Burmese Cambodian Filipino Indian Saint Thomas Christian Ancient Tamil country Lao Thai By religion Christian name Biblical name Papal name Saint's name Dharma name Jewish name Hebrew Theophoric name Manners of address List of authority/of honour Styles Honorific Diplomatic Imperial, royal, and noble Judiciary Religious Ecclesiastical Pre-nominal letters Suffix Emeritus Post-nominal letters Academic Orders, decorations, and medals Titles Academic Imperial, royal and noble Chivalric Court Military Professional Academic Educational Honorary Business Diplomatic Judicial Religious Ecclesiastical Related traditions Baptism Name day Calendar of saints Related Acronym Anonymity Anthropomorphism National personification Call sign Family Galton–Watson process Legal name Name change Nomen nescio -onym Personal identity Identifier Proper name Signature Monogram Royal cypher Khelrtva Signum manus Tughra Naming taboo Category:Lists of names Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Roman_naming_conventions&oldid=996675425" Categories: Roman naming conventions Names by culture Naming conventions Hidden categories: CS1 maint: extra text: authors list Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages العربية Български Brezhoneg Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Español Français 한국어 Hrvatski Bahasa Indonesia Íslenska Italiano עברית ქართული Latina Magyar Македонски Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Polski Português Română Русский Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Українська 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 28 December 2020, at 01:05 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2352 ---- Cambridge - Wikipedia Cambridge From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search This article is about the English city. For the city in Massachusetts, United States, see Cambridge, Massachusetts. For other uses, see Cambridge (disambiguation). City and non-metropolitan district in England Cambridge City of Cambridge City and non-metropolitan district King's College Chapel, seen from the Backs Coat of arms Cambridge shown within Cambridgeshire Cambridge Location within England Show map of England Cambridge Location within the United Kingdom Show map of the United Kingdom Cambridge Location within Europe Show map of Europe Coordinates: 52°12′19″N 0°07′09″E / 52.20528°N 0.11917°E / 52.20528; 0.11917 Sovereign state  United Kingdom Country  England Region East of England Ceremonial county  Cambridgeshire Admin HQ Cambridge Guildhall Founded 1st century City status 1951 Government  • Type Non-metropolitan district, city  • Governing body Cambridge City Council  • Mayor Russ McPherson (L)  • MPs: Daniel Zeichner (L) Anthony Browne (C) Area  • Total 40.7 km2 (15.71 sq mi) Elevation 6 m (20 ft) Population (mid-2019 est. -)  • Total 124,798 (ranked 186th)  • Ethnicity (2011)[1] 66% White British 1.4% White Irish 15% White Other 1.7% Black British 3.2% Mixed Race 11% British Asian & Chinese 1.6% other Demonym(s) Cantabrigian Time zone UTC+0 (Greenwich Mean Time)  • Summer (DST) UTC+1 (BST) Postcode CB1 – CB5 Area code(s) 01223 ONS code 12UB (ONS) E07000008 (GSS) OS grid reference TL450588 Website www.cambridge.gov.uk Cambridge (/ˈkeɪmbrɪdʒ/[2] KAYM-brij) is a university city and the county town of Cambridgeshire, England, on the River Cam approximately 55 miles (89 km) north of London. At the United Kingdom Census 2011, the population of the Cambridge built-up area (which is larger than the remit of Cambridge City Council) was 158,434 including 29,327 students.[3] Cambridge became an important trading centre during the Roman and Viking ages, and there is archaeological evidence of settlement in the area as early as the Bronze Age. The first town charters were granted in the 12th century, although modern city status was not officially conferred until 1951. The University of Cambridge was founded in 1209.[4] The buildings of the university include King's College Chapel, Cavendish Laboratory, and the Cambridge University Library, one of the largest legal deposit libraries in the world. The city's skyline is dominated by several college buildings, along with the spire of the Our Lady and the English Martyrs Church, and the chimney of Addenbrooke's Hospital. Anglia Ruskin University, which evolved from the Cambridge School of Art and the Cambridgeshire College of Arts and Technology, also has its main campus in the city. Cambridge is at the heart of the high-technology Silicon Fen with industries such as software and bioscience and many start-up companies born out of the university. Over 40 per cent of the workforce have a higher education qualification, more than twice the national average. The Cambridge Biomedical Campus, one of the largest biomedical research clusters in the world, is soon to house premises of AstraZeneca, a hotel, and the relocated Royal Papworth Hospital.[5] The first game of association football took place at Parker's Piece. The Strawberry Fair music and arts festival and Midsummer Fair are held on Midsummer Common, and the annual Cambridge Beer Festival takes place on Jesus Green. The city is adjacent to the M11 and A14 roads. Cambridge station is less than an hour from London King's Cross railway station. Contents 1 History 1.1 Prehistory 1.2 Roman 1.3 Medieval 1.4 Early modern 1.5 Early-industrial era 1.6 20th and 21st centuries 2 Governance 2.1 Local government 2.2 Westminster 3 Geography and environment 3.1 Climate 3.2 Ecology 3.3 Green belt 4 Demography 4.1 Historical population 5 Economy 6 Transport 6.1 Rail 7 Education 8 Sport 8.1 Football 8.2 Cricket 8.3 Rugby 8.4 Watersports 8.5 Greyhound racing 8.6 Other sports 8.7 Varsity sports 9 Culture 9.1 Theatre 9.2 Museums 9.3 Music 9.3.1 Popular music 9.3.2 Classical music 9.4 Contemporary art 9.5 Festivals and events 9.6 Literature and film 10 Public services 11 Religion 12 Twinned cities 13 Panoramic gallery 14 See also 15 Notes 16 References 17 Further reading 18 External links History[edit] See also: Timeline of Cambridge Prehistory[edit] See also: Prehistoric Britain and British Iron Age Settlements have existed around the Cambridge area since prehistoric times. The earliest clear evidence of occupation is the remains of a 3,500-year-old farmstead discovered at the site of Fitzwilliam College.[6] Archaeological evidence of occupation through the Iron Age is a settlement on Castle Hill from the 1st century BC, perhaps relating to wider cultural changes occurring in southeastern Britain linked to the arrival of the Belgae.[7] Roman[edit] Main article: Duroliponte The principal Roman site is a small fort (castrum) Duroliponte on Castle Hill, just northwest of the city centre around the location of the earlier British village. The fort was bounded on two sides by the lines formed by the present Mount Pleasant, continuing across Huntingdon Road into Clare Street. The eastern side followed Magrath Avenue, with the southern side running near to Chesterton Lane and Kettle's Yard before turning northwest at Honey Hill.[8] It was constructed around AD 70 and converted to civilian use around 50 years later. Evidence of more widespread Roman settlement has been discovered including numerous farmsteads[9] and a village in the Cambridge district of Newnham.[10] Medieval[edit] Trinity Street, pictured in 2008. Trinity College is on the left, with St John's College in the background. Following the Roman withdrawal from Britain around 410, the location may have been abandoned by the Britons, although the site is usually identified as Cair Grauth[11] listed among the 28 cities of Britain by the History of the Britons.[12][14] Evidence exists that the invading Anglo-Saxons had begun occupying the area by the end of the century.[15] Their settlement – also on and around Castle Hill – became known as Grantebrycge.[17] ("Granta-bridge"). (By Middle English, the settlement's name had changed to "Cambridge", and the lower stretches of the Granta changed their name to match.[18]) Anglo-Saxon grave goods have been found in the area. During this period, Cambridge benefited from good trade links across the hard-to-travel fenlands. By the 7th century, the town was less significant and described by Bede as a "little ruined city" containing the burial site of Etheldreda.[16] Cambridge was on the border between the East and Middle Anglian kingdoms and the settlement slowly expanded on both sides of the river.[16] St Bene't's Church, the oldest standing building in Cambridgeshire, situated next to Corpus Christi College[19] Peterhouse was the first college to be founded in the University of Cambridge. The President's Lodge, Queens' College. The arrival of the Vikings was recorded in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle in 875. Viking rule, the Danelaw, had been imposed by 878[20] Their vigorous trading habits caused the town to grow rapidly. During this period the centre of the town shifted from Castle Hill on the left bank of the river to the area now known as the Quayside on the right bank.[20] After the Viking period, the Saxons enjoyed a return to power, building churches such as St Bene't's Church, wharves, merchant houses and a mint, which produced coins with the town's name abbreviated to "Grant".[20] In 1068, two years after his conquest of England, William of Normandy built a castle on Castle Hill.[16] Like the rest of the newly conquered kingdom, Cambridge fell under the control of the King and his deputies. The first town charter was granted by Henry I between 1120 and 1131. It gave Cambridge monopoly of waterborne traffic and hithe tolls and recognised the borough court.[21] The distinctive Round Church dates from this period.[22] In 1209, Cambridge University was founded by Oxford students fleeing from hostility.[23][24] The oldest existing college, Peterhouse, was founded in 1284.[25] In 1349 Cambridge was affected by the Black Death. Few records survive but 16 of 40 scholars at King's Hall died.[26] The town north of the river was severely affected being almost wiped out.[27] Following further depopulation after a second national epidemic in 1361, a letter from the Bishop of Ely suggested that two parishes in Cambridge be merged as there were not enough people to fill even one church.[26] With more than a third of English clergy dying in the Black Death, four new colleges were established at the university over the following years to train new clergymen, namely Gonville Hall, Trinity Hall, Corpus Christi and Clare.[28] In 1382 a revised town charter effects a "diminution of the liberties that the community had enjoyed", due to Cambridge's participation in the Peasants' Revolt. The charter transfers supervision of baking and brewing, weights and measures, and forestalling and regrating, from the town to the university.[21] King's College Chapel, was begun in 1446 by King Henry VI.[29] The chapel was built in phases by a succession of kings of England from 1446 to 1515, its history intertwined with the Wars of the Roses, and completed during the reign of King Henry VIII.[29] The building would become synonymous with Cambridge, and currently is used in the logo for the City Council.[30] Early modern[edit] Cambridge in 1575 Following repeated outbreaks of pestilence throughout the 16th Century,[31] sanitation and fresh water were brought to Cambridge by the construction of Hobson's Conduit in the early 1600s. Water was brought from Nine Wells, at the foot of the Gog Magog Hills, into the centre of the town.[32] Cambridge played a significant role in the early part of the English Civil War as it was the headquarters of the Eastern Counties Association, an organisation administering a regional East Anglian army, which became the mainstay of the Parliamentarian military effort before the formation of the New Model Army.[33] In 1643 control of the town was given by Parliament to Oliver Cromwell, who had been educated at Sidney Sussex College.[34] The town's castle was fortified and garrisoned with troops and some bridges were destroyed to aid its defence. Although Royalist forces came within 2 miles (3 km) of the town in 1644, the defences were never used and the garrison was stood down the following year.[33] Early-industrial era[edit] In the 19th century, in common with many other English towns, Cambridge expanded rapidly, due in part to increased life expectancy and improved agricultural production leading to increased trade in town markets.[35] The Inclosure Acts of 1801 and 1807 enabled the town to expand over surrounding open fields and in 1912 and again in 1935 its boundaries were extended to include Chesterton, Cherry Hinton, and Trumpington.[33] The railway came to Cambridge in 1845 after initial resistance, with the opening of the Great Eastern Railway's London to Norwich line. The station was outside the town centre following pressure from the university to restrict travel by undergraduates.[36] With the arrival of the railway and associated employment came development of areas around the station, such as Romsey Town.[37] The rail link to London stimulated heavier industries, such as the production of brick, cement and malt.[35] 20th and 21st centuries[edit] From the 1930s to the 1980s, the size of the city was increased by several large council estates.[38] The biggest impact has been on the area north of the river, which are now the estates of East Chesterton, King's Hedges, and Arbury where Archbishop Rowan Williams lived and worked as an assistant priest in the early 1980s.[39] During the Second World War, Cambridge was an important centre for defence of the east coast. The town became a military centre, with an R.A.F. training centre and the regional headquarters for Norfolk, Suffolk, Essex, Cambridgeshire, Huntingdonshire, Hertfordshire, and Bedfordshire established during the conflict.[33] The town itself escaped relatively lightly from German bombing raids, which were mainly targeted at the railway. 29 people were killed and no historic buildings were damaged. In 1944, a secret meeting of military leaders held in Trinity College laid the foundation for the allied invasion of Europe.[35] During the war Cambridge served as an evacuation centre for over 7,000 people from London, as well as for parts of the University of London.[33] Cambridge was granted its city charter in 1951 in recognition of its history, administrative importance and economic success.[33] Cambridge does not have a cathedral, traditionally a prerequisite for city status, instead falling within the Church of England Diocese of Ely. In 1962 Cambridge's first shopping arcade, Bradwell's Court, opened on Drummer Street, though this was demolished in 2006.[40] Other shopping arcades followed at Lion Yard, which housed a relocated Central Library for the city, and the Grafton Centre which replaced Victorian housing stock which had fallen into disrepair in the Kite area of the city. This latter project was controversial at the time.[41] The city gained its second University in 1992 when Anglia Polytechnic became Anglia Polytechnic University. Renamed Anglia Ruskin University in 2005, the institution has its origins in the Cambridge School of Art opened in 1858 by John Ruskin. The Open University also has a presence in the city, with an office operating on Hills Road.[42] Governance[edit] Local government[edit] Map showing the 2010 electoral boundaries of the city, with postcode districts superimposed. See also: Cambridge local elections Cambridge is a non-metropolitan district served by Cambridge City Council. Cambridge Local Authority District covers most of the City's urban area but some extends outside this into South Cambridgeshire District. Cambridge is one of five districts within the county of Cambridgeshire, and is bordered on all sides by the mainly rural South Cambridgeshire district. The city council's headquarters are in the Guildhall, a large building in the market square. Cambridge was granted a Royal Charter by King John in 1207, which permitted the appointment of a Mayor,[43] although the first recorded Mayor, Harvey FitzEustace, served in 1213.[44] City councillors now elect a mayor annually. For electoral purposes the city is divided into 14 wards: Abbey, Arbury, Castle, Cherry Hinton, Coleridge, East Chesterton, King's Hedges, Market, Newnham, Petersfield, Queen Edith's, Romsey, Trumpington, and West Chesterton. The political composition of the city council is currently: 25 Labour councillors, 14 Liberal Democrat, 2 independent and one Conservative.[45] Each of the 14 wards also elects councillors to Cambridgeshire County Council. Responsible for services including school education, social care and highways, since 2017 the County Council has been controlled by the Conservative Party.[46] Westminster[edit] See also: Cambridge (UK Parliament constituency) The parliamentary constituency of Cambridge covers most of the city; Daniel Zeichner (Labour) has represented the seat since the 2015 general election. The seat was generally held by the Conservatives until it was won by Labour in 1992, then taken by the Liberal Democrats in 2005 and 2010, before returning to Labour in 2015. A southern area of the city, Queen Edith's ward,[47] falls within in the South Cambridgeshire constituency, whose MP is Anthony Browne (Conservative), first elected in 2019. The University of Cambridge formerly had two seats in the House of Commons; Sir Isaac Newton was one of the most notable MPs. The Cambridge University constituency was abolished under 1948 legislation, and ceased at the dissolution of Parliament for the 1950 general election, along with the other university constituencies. Geography and environment[edit] Places adjacent to Cambridge Girton Histon and Impington Milton Fen Ditton Coton Cambridge Teversham Grantchester Great Shelford Fulbourn Aerial view of Cambridge city centre Cambridge is situated about 55 miles (89 km) north-by-east of London and 95 miles (152 kilometres) east of Birmingham. The city is located in an area of level and relatively low-lying terrain just south of the Fens, which varies between 6 and 24 metres (20 and 79 ft) above sea level.[48] The town was thus historically surrounded by low lying wetlands that have been drained as the town has expanded.[49] The underlying geology of Cambridge consists of gault clay and Chalk Marl, known locally as Cambridge Greensand,[50] partly overlaid by terrace gravel.[49] A layer of phosphatic nodules (coprolites) under the marl were mined in the 19th century for fertiliser. It became a major industry in the county, and its profits yielded buildings such as the Corn Exchange, Fulbourn Hospital and St. John's Chapel until the Quarries Act 1894 and competition from America ended production.[50] The River Cam flows through the city from the village of Grantchester, to the southwest. It is bordered by water meadows within the city such as Sheep's Green as well as residential development.[49] Like most cities, modern-day Cambridge has many suburbs and areas of high-density housing. The city centre of Cambridge is mostly commercial, historic buildings, and large green areas such as Jesus Green, Parker's Piece and Midsummer Common. Many of the roads in the centre are pedestrianised. The rear of Old Court, Clare College, taken from the Backs. Population growth has seen new housing developments in the 21st century, with estates such as the CB1[51] and Accordia schemes near the station,[52] and developments such as Great Kneighton, formally known as Clay Farm,[53] and Trumpington Meadows[54] currently under construction in the south of the city. Other major developments currently being constructed in the city are Darwin Green (formerly NIAB), and University-led developments at West Cambridge and North West Cambridge, (Eddington). The entire city centre, as well as parts of Chesterton, Petersfield, West Cambridge, Newnham, and Abbey, are covered by an Air Quality Management Area, implemented to counter high levels of nitrogen dioxide in the atmosphere.[55] Climate[edit] The city has an oceanic climate. (Köppen: Cfb).[56] Cambridge currently has two official weather observing stations, the National Institute of Agricultural Botany (NIAB), about 1 mile (2 km) north of the city boundary near Histon, and the Cambridge University Botanic Garden, about 1 mile south of the city centre. In addition, the Digital Technology Group of the University's Department of Computer Science and Technology[57] maintains a weather station on the West Cambridge site, displaying current weather conditions online via web browsers or an app, and also an archive dating back to 1995.[58] The city, like most of the UK, has a maritime climate highly influenced by the Gulf Stream. Located in the driest region of Britain,[59][60] Cambridge's rainfall averages around 570 mm (22.44 in) per year, around half the national average,[61] The driest recent year was in 2011 with 380.4 mm (14.98 in)[62] of rain at the Botanic Garden and 347.2 mm (13.67 in) at the NIAB site.[63] This is just below the semi-arid precipitation threshold for the area, which is 350mm of annual precipitation.[64] Conversely, 2012 was the wettest year on record, with 812.7 mm (32.00 in) reported.[65] Snowfall accumulations are usually small, in part because of Cambridge's low elevation, and low precipitation tendency during transitional snow events. Owing to its low lying, inland, and easterly position within the British Isles, summer temperatures tend to be somewhat higher than areas further west, and often rival or even exceed those recorded in the London area. July 2006 for example recorded the highest official mean monthly maximum (i.e. averaged over the entire month) of any month at any location in the UK since records began; 28.3 °C (82.9 °F), at both the NIAB[66] and Botanic Garden[67] observing stations. Cambridge also often records the annual highest national temperature in any given year – 30.2 °C (86.4 °F) in July 2008 at NIAB[68] and 30.1 °C (86.2 °F) in August 2007 at the Botanic Garden[69] are two recent examples. Other years include 1876, 1887, 1888, 1892, 1897, 1899 and 1900.[70] The absolute maximum stands at 38.7 °C (101.7 °F) recorded on 25 July 2019 at Cambridge University Botanic Garden,[71] which is also the national all time temperature record. Typically the temperature will reach 25.1 °C (77.2 °F) or higher on over 25 days of the year over the 1981–2010 period,[72] with the annual warmest day averaging 31.5 °C (88.7 °F)[73] over the same period. The absolute minimum temperature recorded at the Botanic Garden site was −17.2 °C (1.0 °F), recorded in February 1947,[74] although a minimum of −17.8 °C (0.0 °F) was recorded at the now defunct observatory site in December 1879.[75] More recently the temperature fell to −15.3 °C (4.5 °F) on 11 February 2012,[76] −12.2 °C (10.0 °F) on 22 January 2013[77] and −10.9 °C (12.4 °F)[78] on 20 December 2010. The average frequency of air frosts ranges from 42.8 days at the NIAB site,[79] to 48.3 days at the Botanic Garden[80] per year over the 1981–2010 period. Typically the coldest night of the year at the Botanic Garden will fall to −8.0 °C (17.6 °F).[81] Such minimum temperatures and frost averages are typical for inland areas across much of southern and central England. Sunshine averages around 1,500 hours a year or around 35% of possible, a level typical of most locations in inland central England. Climate data for Cambridge University Botanic Garden[a], elevation: 13 m (43 ft), 1981–2010 normals, extremes 1914–present Month Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Year Record high °C (°F) 14.9 (58.8) 18.8 (65.8) 23.9 (75.0) 27.4 (81.3) 31.1 (88.0) 34.0 (93.2) 38.7 (101.7) 36.9 (98.4) 33.9 (93.0) 29.3 (84.7) 21.1 (70.0) 15.8 (60.4) 38.7 (101.7) Average high °C (°F) 7.4 (45.3) 8.0 (46.4) 11.1 (52.0) 13.8 (56.8) 17.5 (63.5) 20.4 (68.7) 23.1 (73.6) 22.8 (73.0) 19.6 (67.3) 15.2 (59.4) 10.5 (50.9) 7.7 (45.9) 14.8 (58.6) Daily mean °C (°F) 4.4 (39.9) 4.6 (40.3) 7.1 (44.8) 9.1 (48.4) 12.4 (54.3) 15.3 (59.5) 17.8 (64.0) 17.5 (63.5) 14.8 (58.6) 11.2 (52.2) 7.2 (45.0) 4.7 (40.5) 10.5 (50.9) Average low °C (°F) 1.4 (34.5) 1.2 (34.2) 3.0 (37.4) 4.3 (39.7) 7.3 (45.1) 10.2 (50.4) 12.4 (54.3) 12.2 (54.0) 10.0 (50.0) 7.2 (45.0) 3.9 (39.0) 1.7 (35.1) 6.2 (43.2) Record low °C (°F) −16.1 (3.0) −17.2 (1.0) −11.7 (10.9) −6.1 (21.0) −4.4 (24.1) −0.6 (30.9) 2.2 (36.0) 3.3 (37.9) −2.2 (28.0) −6.1 (21.0) −13.3 (8.1) −15.6 (3.9) −17.2 (1.0) Average precipitation mm (inches) 46.0 (1.81) 34.6 (1.36) 38.6 (1.52) 40.3 (1.59) 46.7 (1.84) 52.1 (2.05) 50.7 (2.00) 53.6 (2.11) 54.3 (2.14) 57.7 (2.27) 54.9 (2.16) 46.9 (1.85) 576.2 (22.69) Average precipitation days (≥ 1.0 mm) 10.7 8.4 9.9 8.9 8.1 9.2 8.4 8.2 8.4 9.5 10.2 9.7 109.6 Source: KNMI[82] Climate data for Cambridge NIAB[b], elevation: 26 m (85 ft), 1981–2010 normals Month Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Year Average high °C (°F) 7.3 (45.1) 7.7 (45.9) 10.6 (51.1) 13.3 (55.9) 16.9 (62.4) 19.9 (67.8) 22.8 (73.0) 22.6 (72.7) 19.3 (66.7) 14.9 (58.8) 10.3 (50.5) 7.5 (45.5) 14.5 (58.1) Daily mean °C (°F) 4.5 (40.1) 4.5 (40.1) 6.9 (44.4) 8.8 (47.8) 12.0 (53.6) 15.1 (59.2) 17.6 (63.7) 17.5 (63.5) 14.9 (58.8) 11.3 (52.3) 7.3 (45.1) 4.7 (40.5) 10.4 (50.7) Average low °C (°F) 1.6 (34.9) 1.3 (34.3) 3.1 (37.6) 4.3 (39.7) 7.1 (44.8) 10.2 (50.4) 12.4 (54.3) 12.4 (54.3) 10.4 (50.7) 7.6 (45.7) 4.2 (39.6) 1.9 (35.4) 6.4 (43.5) Average precipitation mm (inches) 46.6 (1.83) 34.5 (1.36) 38.3 (1.51) 41.2 (1.62) 46.0 (1.81) 51.5 (2.03) 47.5 (1.87) 50.8 (2.00) 53.5 (2.11) 59.0 (2.32) 52.8 (2.08) 46.4 (1.83) 568.1 (22.37) Average precipitation days (≥ 1.0 mm) 10.5 8.0 9.6 8.8 8.0 8.9 8.3 8.0 8.4 9.4 9.8 9.8 107.5 Mean monthly sunshine hours 58.3 77.1 110.7 152.5 179.4 176.7 187.6 182.6 139.5 113.9 66.7 49.3 1,494.5 Source: Met Office[83] Ecology[edit] The city contains three Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs), at Cherry Hinton East Pit, Cherry Hinton West Pit, and Travellers Pit,[84] and ten Local Nature Reserves (LNRs): Sheep's Green and Coe Fen, Coldham's Common, Stourbridge Common, Nine Wells, Byron's Pool, West Pit, Paradise, Barnwell West, Barnwell East, and Logan's Meadow.[85] Green belt[edit] Further information: Cambridge Green Belt Cambridge is completely enclosed by green belt as a part of a wider environmental and planning policy first defined in 1965 and formalised in 1992.[86][87] While some small tracts of green belt exist on the fringes of the city's boundary, much of the protection is in the surrounding South Cambridgeshire[88] and nearby East Cambridgeshire[89] districts, helping to maintain local green space, prevent further urban sprawl and unplanned expansion of the city, as well as protecting smaller outlying villages from further convergence with each other as well as the city.[90] Demography[edit] At the 2011 Census, the population of the Cambridge contiguous built-up area (urban area) was 158,434,[91] while that of the City Council area was 123,867.[92] In the 2001 Census held during University term, 89.44% of Cambridge residents identified themselves as white, compared with a national average of 92.12%.[93] Within the University, 84% of undergraduates and 80% of post-graduates identify as white (including overseas students).[94] Cambridge has a much higher than average proportion of people in the highest paid professional, managerial or administrative jobs (32.6% vs. 23.5%)[95] and a much lower than average proportion of manual workers (27.6% vs. 40.2%).[95] In addition, 41.2% have a higher-level qualification (e.g. degree, Higher National Diploma, Master's or PhD), much higher than the national average proportion (19.7%).[96] Centre for Cities identified Cambridge as the UK's most unequal city in 2017 and 2018. Residents' income was the least evenly distributed of 57 British cities measured, with its top 6% earners accounting for 19% of its total income and the bottom 20% for only 2%, and a Gini coefficient of 0.460 in 2018.[97][98] Historical population[edit] Year Population Year Population 1749 6,131 6131  1901 38,379 38379  ⋮ 1911 40,027 40027  1801 10,087 10087  1921 59,212 59212  1811 11,108 11108  1931 66,789 66789  1821 14,142 14142  1951 81,500 81500  1831 20,917 20917  1961 95,527 95527  1841 24,453 24453  1971 99,168 99168  1851 27,815 27815  1981 87,209 87209  1861 26,361 26361  1991 107,496 107496  1871 30,078 30078  2001 108,863 108863  1891 36,983 36983  2011 123,900 123900  Local census 1749[99] Census: Regional District 1801–1901[100] Civil Parish 1911–1961[101] District 1971–2011[102] Economy[edit] The town's river link to the surrounding agricultural land, and good road connections to London in the south meant Cambridge has historically served as an important regional trading post. King Henry I granted Cambridge a monopoly on river trade, privileging this area of the economy of Cambridge[103] The town market provided for trade in a wide variety of goods and annual trading fairs such as Stourbridge Fair and Midsummer Fair were visited by merchants from across the country. The river was described in an account of 1748 as being "often so full of [merchant boats] that the navigation thereof is stopped for some time".[104] For example, 2000 firkins of butter were brought up the river every Monday from the agricultural lands to the North East, particularity Norfolk, to be unloaded in the town for road transportation to London.[104] Changing patterns of retail distribution and the advent of the railways led to a decline in Cambridge's importance as a market town.[105] Cambridge Market viewed from the Tower of St. Mary the Great Today Cambridge has a diverse economy with strength in sectors such as research & development, software consultancy, high value engineering, creative industries, pharmaceuticals and tourism.[106] Described as one of the "most beautiful cities in the world" by Forbes in 2010,[107] with the view from The Backs being selected as one of the 10 greatest in England by National Trust chair Simon Jenkins, tourism generates over £750 million for the city's economy.[108] Cambridge and its surrounds are sometimes referred to as Silicon Fen, an allusion to Silicon Valley, because of the density of high-tech businesses and technology incubators that have developed on science parks around the city. Many of these parks and buildings are owned or leased by university colleges, and the companies often have been spun out of the university.[109] Cambridge Science Park, which is the largest commercial R&D centre in Europe, is owned by Trinity College;[110][111] St John's is the landlord of St John's Innovation Centre.[112] Technology companies include Abcam, CSR, ARM Limited, CamSemi, Jagex and Sinclair.[113] Microsoft has located its Microsoft Research UK offices in West Cambridge, separate from the main Microsoft UK campus in Reading, and also has an office on Station Road. Cambridge was also the home of Pye Ltd, founded in 1898 by W. G. Pye, who worked in the Cavendish Laboratory; it began by supplying the University and later specialised in wireless telegraphy equipment, radios, televisions and also defence equipment.[35] Pye Ltd evolved into several other companies including TETRA radio equipment manufacturer Sepura. Another major business is Marshall Aerospace located on the eastern edge of the city. The Cambridge Network keeps businesses in touch with each other. The software company Autonomy Corporation is located at the Business Park on Cowley Road. Transport[edit] Main article: Transport in Cambridge A guided bus on the Cambridgeshire Guided Busway Because of its rapid growth in the 20th century, Cambridge has a congested road network.[114] The M11 motorway from east London terminates to the north-west of the city where it joins the A14, a major freight route which connects the port of Felixstowe on the east coast with the Midlands. The A428 connects the city with the A1 at St Neots: the route continues westwards towards Oxford (as the A421) via Bedford and Milton Keynes. The A10 connects the city to King's Lynn to the north via Ely, and is the historic route south to the City of London. As a university town lying on fairly flat ground and with traffic congestion, Cambridge has the highest level of cycle use in the UK.[115] According to the 2001 census, 25% of residents travelled to work by bicycle. Furthermore, a survey in 2013 found that 47% of residents travel by bike at least once a week.[116] Cambridge has five Park and Ride sites, all of which operate seven days a week and are aimed at encouraging motorists to park near the city's edge.[117] Since 2011, the Cambridgeshire Guided Busway has carried bus services into the centre of Cambridge from St Ives, Huntingdon, and other towns and villages along the routes, operated by Stagecoach in the Fens and Whippet.[118] The A service continues on to the railway station and Addenbrookes, before terminating at a new Park and Ride in Trumpington. Since 2017 it has also linked to Cambridge North railway station. Although Cambridge has its own airport, Cambridge City Airport, it has no scheduled services and is used mainly by charter and training flights as well FBO services.[119] London Stansted Airport, about 30 miles (48 km) south via the M11 or direct rail, offers a broad range of international destinations. Rail[edit] Cambridge railway station. Cambridge railway station was opened in 1845, initially linking to Bishopsgate station in London, via Bishops Stortford.[120] Further lines opened throughout the 19th century, including the Cambridge and St Ives branch line, the Stour Valley Railway, the Cambridge to Mildenhall railway, and the Varsity Line to Oxford. Another station was opened in Cherry Hinton though, at the time, this was a separate village to Cambridge. Several of these lines were closed during the 1960s. Today, Cambridge station has direct rail links to London with termini at London King's Cross (via the Cambridge Line and the East Coast Main Line), Liverpool Street (on the West Anglia Main Line), and St Pancras (on the Thameslink line). Commuter trains to King's Cross run every half-hour during peak hours, with a journey time of 53 minutes.[121] Trains also run to King's Lynn and Ely (via the Fen Line), Norwich (via the Breckland Line), Leicester, Birmingham, Peterborough, Stevenage, Ipswich, Stansted Airport, Brighton and Gatwick Airport railway stations. A second railway station, Cambridge North, opened on 21 May 2017, having originally planned to open in March 2015.[122][123][124] A third railway station, Cambridge South, near Addenbrooke's Hospital has been proposed.[125] It is expected to open in 2025.[126] In February 2020, consultations opened for a commuter light railway known as the Cambridge Autonomous Metro. It will connect the historic city centre and the existing busway route with the mainline railway stations, Cambridge Science Park, and Haverhill.[127] Education[edit] Anglia Ruskin University evolved from the nineteenth century Cambridge School of Art, opened by educationist and art figure John Ruskin in 1858 See also: List of schools in Cambridgeshire Cambridge's two universities,[128] the collegiate University of Cambridge and the local campus of Anglia Ruskin University, serve around 30,000 students, by some estimates.[129] Cambridge University estimated its 2007/08 student population at 17,662,[130] and Anglia Ruskin reports 24,000 students across its two campuses (one of which is outside Cambridge, in Chelmsford) for the same period.[131] ARU now (2019) has additional campuses in London and Perborough. State provision in the further education sector includes Hills Road Sixth Form College, Long Road Sixth Form College, and Cambridge Regional College. Both state and independent schools serve Cambridge pupils from nursery to secondary school age. State schools are administered by Cambridgeshire County Council, which maintains 251 schools in total,[132] 35 of them in Cambridge city.[133] Netherhall School, Chesterton Community College, the Parkside Federation (comprising Parkside Community College and Coleridge Community College), North Cambridge Academy and the Christian inter-denominational St Bede's School provide comprehensive secondary education.[134] Many other pupils from the Cambridge area attend village colleges, an educational institution unique to Cambridgeshire, which serve as secondary schools during the day and adult education centres outside of school hours.[135] Independent schools in the city include The Perse School, Stephen Perse Foundation, Sancton Wood School, St Mary's School, Heritage School and The Leys School.[136] The city has one university technical college, Cambridge Academy for Science and Technology, which opened in September 2014. Sport[edit] Football[edit] Parker's Piece Cambridge played a unique role in the invention of modern football: the game's first set of rules were drawn up by members of the University in 1848. The Cambridge Rules were first played on Parker's Piece and had a 'defining influence on the 1863 Football Association rules' which again were first played on Parker's Piece.[137] The city is home to Cambridge United FC, who play at the Abbey Stadium. Formed in 1912, as Abbey United, they were elected to the Football League in 1970 and reached the Football League Second Division in 1978, although a serious decline in them in the mid 1980s saw them drop back down to the Football League Fourth Division and almost go out of business. Success returned to the club in the early 1990s when they won two successive promotions and reached the FA Cup quarter finals in both of those seasons, and in 1992 they came close to becoming the first English team to win three successive Football League promotions which would have taken them into the newly created FA Premier League. But they were beaten in the playoffs and another decline set in, which was completed in 2005 when they were relegated from the Football League and for the second time in 20 years narrowly avoided going out of business. After nine years of non-league football they returned to the Football League in 2014 by winning the Conference National playoffs. Cambridge City FC of the Southern Football League Premier Division now play in the adjoining village of Histon. Formed in Cambridge in 1908 as Cambridge Town, the club were Southern Premier League champions in 1962–63, the highest they have finished in the English football pyramid. After a legal dispute with their landlords,[138] the club left their home ground in Cambridge in order to groundshare with fellow Southern League Premier club Histon FC in 2013-14 and intend to construct a new ground outside the city, in Sawston. Cricket[edit] As well as being the home of the Cambridge Rules in football, Parker's Piece was used for first-class cricket matches from 1817 to 1864.[139] The University of Cambridge's cricket ground, Fenner's, is located in the city and is one of the home grounds for minor counties team Cambridgeshire CCC.[140] There are seven amateur cricket clubs within the city: Cambridge Granta, Camden, Cambridge St Giles, New Chesterton Institute, Fen Ditton, Romsey Town and Cherry Hinton.[141] Rugby[edit] The city is represented in both codes of Rugby football. Rugby Union club Cambridge R.U.F.C. were founded in 1923,[142] and play in National League 1[143] at their home ground, Grantchester Road, in the southwest corner of the city. Cambridge Lions represent the city in rugby league, and are members of East Rugby League.[144] Watersports[edit] Bumps race on the River Cam The River Cam running through the city centre is used for boating. The University and its colleges are well known for rowing and the Cambridgeshire Rowing Association, formed in 1868, organises competitive rowing on the river outside of the University.[145] Rowing clubs based in the city include City of Cambridge RC, Cambridge '99 RC, Cantabrigian RC and Rob Roy BC. Shallower parts of the Cam are used for recreational punting, a type of boating in which the craft is propelled by pushing against the river bed with a quant pole. Cambridge Swimming Club, Cambridge Dive team, and City of Cambridge Water Polo Club are all based at Parkside Swimming Pool.[146] Greyhound racing[edit] This section contains information of unclear or questionable importance or relevance to the article's subject matter. Please help improve this section by clarifying or removing indiscriminate details. If importance cannot be established, the section is likely to be moved to another article, pseudo-redirected, or removed. Find sources: "Cambridge" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (Learn how and when to remove this template message) There are three known former venues for greyhound racing in Cambridge. The most significant venue was the racing held around the City Ground which was licensed by the sports governing body the National Greyhound Racing Club (NGRC) and took place from 1968 to 1984. The other two venues were independent tracks and known as a flapping tracks, the nickname given to non-NGRC tracks.[147] They were at Coldham Road, which was opened by the Cambridge and District Greyhound Racing Club on 10 April 1931, and Cowper Lane which also opened in 1931.[148] Other sports[edit] Cambridge is home to two Real Tennis courts (out of just 42 in the world) at Cambridge University Real Tennis Club.[149] British American Football League club Cambridgeshire Cats play at Coldham's Common. Cambridge Royals are members of the British Baseball Federation's Triple-A South Division.[150] Cambridge has two cycling clubs: Team Cambridge[151] and Cambridge Cycling Club.[152] Cambridge & Coleridge Athletic Club[153] is the city's track and field club, based at the University of Cambridge's Wilberforce Road track. Cambridge Handball Club compete in the men's England Handball National Super 8 League, and the women's England Handball National Super 7 League. There are three field hockey clubs; Cambridge City Hockey Club, Cambridge South Hockey Club and Cambridge Nomads. The city is also represented in polo by Cambridge Polo Club, based in Barton, just outside the city. The Romsey Town Rollerbillies play roller derby in Cambridge.[154] Speedway racing was formerly staged at a greyhound stadium in Coldhams Lane.[155] Varsity sports[edit] Cambridge is also known for the sporting events between the University of Cambridge and the University of Oxford, especially the rugby union Varsity Match and the Boat Race, though many of these do not take place within Cambridge. Culture[edit] Theatre[edit] Cambridge Corn Exchange Cambridge's main traditional theatre is the Arts Theatre, a venue with 666 seats in the town centre.[156] The theatre often has touring shows, as well as those by local companies. The largest venue in the city to regular hold theatrical performances is the Cambridge Corn Exchange with a capacity of 1,800 standing or 1,200 seated. Housed within the city's 19th century former corn exchange building the venue was used for a variety of additional functions throughout the 20th century including tea parties, motor shows, sports matches and a music venue with temporary stage.[157] The City Council renovated the building in the 1980s, turning it into a full-time arts venue, hosting theatre, dance and music performances.[157] The newest theatre venue in Cambridge is the 220-seat J2, part of Cambridge Junction in Cambridge Leisure Park. The venue was opened in 2005 and hosts theatre, dance, live music and comedy[158] The ADC Theatre is managed by the University of Cambridge, and typically has 3 shows a week during term time. It hosts the Cambridge University Footlights Dramatic Club which has produced many notable figures in British comedy. The Mumford Theatre is part of Anglia Ruskin University, and hosts shows by both student and non-student groups. There are also a number of venues within the colleges. Museums[edit] Within the city there are several notable museums, some run by the University of Cambridge Museums consortium and others independent of it. The Fitzwilliam Museum is the city's largest, and is the lead museum of the University of Cambridge Museums. Founded in 1816 from the bequeathment and collections of Richard, Viscount FitzWilliam, the museum was originally located in the building of the Perse Grammar School in Free School Lane.[159] After a brief housing in the University of Cambridge library, it moved to its current, purpose-built building on Trumpington Street in 1848.[159] The museum has five departments: Antiquities; Applied Arts; Coins and Medals; Manuscripts and Printed Books; and Paintings, Drawings and Prints. Other members of the University of Cambridge Museums are the Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, The Polar Museum, The Sedgwick Museum of Earth Sciences, Museum of Classical Archaeology, The Whipple Museum of the History of Science, and the University Museum of Zoology. The Museum of Cambridge, formerly known as the Cambridge & County Folk Museum, is a social history museum located in a former pub on Castle Street.[160] The Centre for Computing History, a museum dedicated to the story of the Information age, moved to Cambridge from Haverhill in 2013.[161] Housed in a former sewage pumping station, the Cambridge Museum of Technology has a collection of large exhibits related to the city's industrial heritage. Music[edit] Popular music[edit] Pink Floyd are the most notable band with roots in Cambridge. The band's former songwriter, guitarist and vocalist Syd Barrett was born and lived in the city, and he and another founding member, Roger Waters, went to school together at Cambridgeshire High School for Boys. David Gilmour, the guitarist who replaced Barrett, was also a Cambridge resident and attended the nearby Perse School. Bands that were formed in Cambridge include Clean Bandit, Henry Cow, The Movies, Katrina and the Waves, The Soft Boys,[162] Ezio[163] The Broken Family Band,[164] Uncle Acid & the Deadbeats,[165] and the pop-classical group King's Singers, who were formed at the University.[166] Solo artist Boo Hewerdine[167] is from Cambridge, as are drum and bass artists (and brothers) Nu:Tone and Logistics. Singers Matthew Bellamy,[168] of the rock band Muse, Tom Robinson,[169] and Olivia Newton-John[170] were born in the city. 2012 Mercury Prize winners Alt-J are based in Cambridge.[171] Live music venues hosting popular music in the city include the Cambridge Corn Exchange, Cambridge Junction and the Portland Arms. Classical music[edit] Started in 1991, the annual Cambridge Music Festival takes place each November.[172] The Cambridge Summer Music Festival takes place in July.[173] Contemporary art[edit] Cambridge contains the Kettle's Yard gallery and the artist run organisations Aid and Abet, Cambridge Art Salon, and Changing Spaces.[174] Wysing Arts Centre, one of the leading research centres for the visual arts in Europe, is associated with the city, though is located several miles west of Cambridge.[175] Anglia Ruskin University operates the publicly accessible Ruskin Gallery within the Cambridge School of Art.[176] Festivals and events[edit] Strawberry Fair Several fairs and festivals take place in Cambridge, mostly during the British summer. Midsummer Fair dates back to 1211, when it was granted a charter by King John.[177] Today it exists primarily as an annual funfair with the vestige of a market attached and is held over several days around or close to midsummers day. On the first Saturday in June Midsummer Common is the site for Strawberry Fair, a free music and children's fair, with various market stalls. For one week in May, on Jesus Green, the annual Cambridge Beer Festival has been held since 1974.[178] Cambridge Folk Festival is held annually in the grounds of Cherry Hinton Hall. The festival has been organised by the city council since its inception in 1964. The Cambridge Summer Music Festival is an annual festival of classical music, held in the University's colleges and chapels.[179] The Cambridge Shakespeare Festival is an eight-week season of open-air performances of the works of William Shakespeare, held in the gardens of various colleges of the university.[180] Started in 1977, the Cambridge Film Festival was held annually in July, moving to September in 2008 to avoid a clash with the rescheduled Edinburgh Film Festival.[181] The Cambridge Science Festival, typically held annually in March, is the United Kingdom's largest free science festival.[182] Between 1975 and 1985 the Cambridge Poetry Festival was held biannually.[183] Other festivals include the annual Mill Road Winter Fair, held the first Saturday of December,[184] the E-luminate Festival, which has taken place every November since 2013,[185] and The Big Weekend, is a city outdoor event organised by the City Council every July.[186] Three Cambridge Free Festivals held in 1969, 1970, and 1971 that featured artists including David Bowie, King Crimson, Roy Harper, Spontaneous Combustion, UFO and others are believed by the festival organiser to have been the first free multiple-day rock music festivals held in the UK.[187][188][189][190][191][192][193][194][195] Literature and film[edit] See also: University of Cambridge in popular culture The city has been the setting for all or part of several novels, including Douglas Adams' Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency, Rose Macaulay's They Were Defeated,[196] Kate Atkinson's Case Histories,[197] Rebecca Stott's Ghostwalk[198] and Robert Harris' Enigma,[199][200] while Susanna Gregory wrote a series of novels set in 14th century Cambridge.[201] Gwen Raverat, the granddaughter of Charles Darwin, talked about her late Victorian Cambridge childhood in her memoir Period Piece and The Night Climbers of Cambridge is a book written by Noel Symington under the pseudonym "Whipplesnaith" about nocturnal climbing on the colleges and town buildings of Cambridge in the 1930s.[202] Fictionalised versions of Cambridge appear in Philippa Pearce's Tom's Midnight Garden and Minnow on the Say, the city renamed as Castleford, and as the home of Tom Sharpe's fictional college in Porterhouse Blue.[203] ITV TV series Granchester was partly filmed in Cambridge.[204] Public services[edit] Addenbrooke's Hospital Cambridge is served by Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, with several smaller medical centres in the city and a teaching hospital at Addenbrooke's. Located on the Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Addenbrooke's is one of the largest hospitals in the United Kingdom and is a designated regional trauma centre. The East of England Ambulance Service covers the city and has an ambulance station on Hills Road.[205] The smaller Brookfields Hospital stands on Mill Road.[206] Cambridgeshire Constabulary provides the city's policing; the main police station is at Parkside,[207] adjacent to the city's fire station, operated by Cambridgeshire Fire and Rescue Service.[208] Cambridge Water Company supplies water services to the city,[209] while Anglian Water provides sewerage services.[210] For the supply of electricity, Cambridge is part of the East of England region, for which the distribution network operator is UK Power Networks.[211] The city has no power stations, though a five-metre wind turbine, part of a Cambridge Regional College development, can be seen in King's Hedges.[212] The Cambridge Electric Supply Company had provided the city with electricity since the early twentieth century from Cambridge power station. Upon nationalisation of the electricity industry in 1948 ownership passed to the British Electricity Authority and later to the Central Electricity Generating Board. Electricity connections to the national grid rendered the small 7.26 megawatt (MW) coal fired power station redundant. It closed in 1965 and was subsequently demolished; in its final year of operation it delivered 2771 MWh of electricity to the city.[213] Following the Public Libraries Act 1850 the city's first public library, located on Jesus Lane, was opened in 1855.[214] It was moved to the Guildhall in 1862,[214] and is now located in the Grand Arcade shopping centre. The library was reopened in September 2009,[215] after having been closed for refurbishment for 33 months, more than twice as long as was forecast when the library closed for redevelopment in January 2007.[215][216] As of 2018 the city contains six public libraries, run by the County Council.[217] The Cambridge City Cemetery is located to the north of Newmarket Road. Religion[edit] Great St Mary's Church marks the centre of Cambridge, while the Senate House on the left is the centre of the University. Gonville and Caius College is in the background. Cambridge has a number of churches, some of which form a significant part of the city's architectural landscape. Like the rest of Cambridgeshire it is part of the Anglican Diocese of Ely.[218] A Cambridge-based family and youth Christian charity, Romsey Mill, had its centre re-dedicated in 2007 by the Archbishop of York, and is quoted as an example of best practice in a study[219] into social inclusion by the East of England Regional Assembly. Great St Mary's Church has the status of "University Church".[220] Many of the University colleges contain chapels that hold services according to the rites and ceremonies of the Church of England, while the chapel of St Edmund's College is Roman Catholic.[221] The city also has a number of theological colleges training clergy for ordination into a number of denominations, with affiliations to both the University of Cambridge and Anglia Ruskin University. Cambridge is in the Roman Catholic Diocese of East Anglia and is served by the large Gothic Revival Our Lady and the English Martyrs Church at the junction of Hills Road and Lensfield Road, St Laurence's on Milton Road, St Vincent De Paul Church on Ditton Lane and by the church of St Philip Howard, in Cherry Hinton Road.[222] There is a Russian Orthodox church under the Diocese of Sourozh who worship at the chapel of Westcott House,[223] the Greek Orthodox Church holds services at the purpose-built St Athanasios church under the Archdiocese of Thyateira and Great Britain,[224] while the Romanian Orthodox Church share St Giles' with the Church of England.[225] St Botolph's Church, next to Corpus Christi College. Wesley Methodist Church Castle Street Methodist Church There are two Methodist churches in the city. Wesley Methodist Church was built in 1913, and is located next to Christ's Pieces. The Castle Street Methodist Church is the oldest of the two, having been built in 1823, and was formerly a Primitive Methodist church. There are three Quaker Meetings in Cambridge, located on Jesus Lane, Hartington Grove, and a Meeting called "Oast House" that meets in Pembroke College.[226] An Orthodox synagogue and Jewish student centre is located on Thompson's Lane, operated jointly by the Cambridge Traditional Jewish Congregation and the Cambridge University Jewish Society, which is affiliated to the Union of Jewish Students.[227][228] The Beth Shalom Reform synagogue which previously met at a local school,[229] opened a purpose-built synagogue in 2015.[230] There is also a student-led egalitarian minyan which holds services on Friday evenings. Cambridge Central Mosque atrium, looking out towards Mill Road Cambridge Central Mosque is the main place of worship for Cambridge's community of around 4,000 Muslims.[231][232] Opened in 2019, it is described as Europe's first eco-friendly mosque[233] and is the first purpose-built mosque within the city. The Abu Bakr Jamia Islamic Centre on Mawson Road and the Omar Faruque Mosque and Cultural Centre in Kings Hedges are additional places of Muslim worship.[234][235][236] Cambridge Buddhist Centre which belongs to Triratna Buddhist Community was opened in the former Barnwell Theatre on Newmarket Road in 1998.[237] There are also several local Buddhist meditation groups from various Buddhist traditions like Samatha Trust and Buddha Mettā Society that are available for anyone to explore Buddhism and Buddhist meditation practices.[238] A Hindu shrine was opened in 2010 at the Bharat Bhavan Indian cultural centre off Mill Road.[239][240] Twinned cities[edit] Cambridge is twinned with two cities. Like Cambridge, both have universities and are also similar in population; Heidelberg, Germany since 1965,[241] and Szeged, Hungary since 1987.[241] Panoramic gallery[edit] King's Parade, seen from outside St. Mary the Great Panorama of the city centre, viewed from the tower of St. Mary the Great Panorama of Trinity Street See also[edit] England portal Cambridgeshire Archives and Local Studies List of bridges in Cambridge Category:Buildings and structures in Cambridge Category:Organisations based in Cambridge Category:People from Cambridge Notes[edit] ^ Weather station is located 0.8 miles (1.3 km) from the Cambridge city centre. ^ Weather station is located 3 miles (5 km) from the Cambridge city centre. References[edit] ^ UK Census (2011). "Local Area Report – Cambridge Local Authority (2092957699)". Nomis. Office for National Statistics. Retrieved 8 February 2018. ^ "Cambridge". Collins Dictionary. n.d. Archived from the original on 23 September 2015. Retrieved 24 September 2014. ^ UK Census (2011). "Local Area Report – Cambridge BUA (E34004798)". Nomis. Office for National Statistics. Retrieved 18 June 2020. ^ Cairns, Richard (1 October 2011). "What it takes to make it to Oxbridge". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 18 May 2012. Retrieved 26 February 2012. ^ "Papworth heart and lung specialist hospital to move". BBC News. 3 December 2013. Archived from the original on 26 September 2018. Retrieved 20 June 2018. ^ "Bronze Age site is found in city". BBC News. 17 January 2008. Archived from the original on 11 January 2009. Retrieved 5 February 2009. ^ "A brief history of Cambridge". Cambridge City Council. 2010. Archived from the original on 22 May 2011. Retrieved 27 June 2010. ^ Gray, Ronald D; Stubbings, Derek (2000). Cambridge Street-Names: Their Origins and Associations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 2–3. ^ Henley, John (28 August 2009). "The Roman foundations of Cambridge". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on 19 December 2013. Retrieved 26 February 2012. 'What's interesting about Cambridge is that with these tracts of land bequeathed to the university, you have a lot of preserved green space coming in close to the city centre,' says Chris Evans, head of the Cambridge unit. 'It hasn't been developed in the intervening centuries. There are iron-age and Roman farmsteads literally every 200–300 metres.' ^ "Schoolgirls unearth Roman village under College garden". University of Cambridge. 22 September 2010. Archived from the original on 16 October 2015. Retrieved 26 February 2012. Large amounts of Roman pottery convinced both Dr Hills and Dr Lewis that they had dug through to the remains of a 2,000-year-old settlement, significant because it suggests that the Roman presence at Newnham was far more considerable than previously thought. ^ Nennius (attrib.). Theodor Mommsen (ed.). Historia Brittonum, VI. Composed after AD 830. (in Latin) Hosted at Latin Wikisource. ^ Ford, David Nash. "The 28 Cities of Britain Archived 15 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine" at Britannia. 2000. ^ Newman, John Henry & al. Lives of the English Saints: St. German, Bishop of Auxerre, Ch. X: "Britain in 429, A. D.", p. 92. Archived 21 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine James Toovey (London), 1844. ^ Although note that Bishop Ussher believed the listing to refer to the Cambridge in Gloucestershire.[13] ^ Burnham, Barry C; Wacher, John (1990). The Small Towns of Roman Britain. London: B T Batsford. ^ a b c d Roach, J.P.C., ed. (1959). "The city of Cambridge: Medieval history". A History of the County of Cambridge and the Isle of Ely: Volume 3: The City and University of Cambridge. Institute of Historical Research. Archived from the original on 12 June 2012. Retrieved 18 July 2011. ^ In the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, cited by Roach.[16] ^ Chance, F. (13 November 1869). "Cambridge". Notes and Queries: A Medium of Inter-Communication for Literary Men, General Readers, Etc. London: Bell & Daldy. 4: 401–404. OCLC 644126889. Archived from the original on 3 February 2016. Retrieved 25 February 2012. ^ Taylor, Kevin (31 March 1994). Central Cambridge: A Guide to the University and Colleges. Cambridge University Press. p. 34. ISBN 9780521459136. Retrieved 13 September 2016. ^ a b c Nugent Lawrence Brooke, Christopher; Riehl Leader, Damien (1988). A history of the University of Cambridge. 1. Cambridge University Press. pp. 9–10 [10]. ISBN 0-521-32882-9. ^ a b Roach, J.P.C., ed. (1959). "The city of Cambridge: Constitutional history". A History of the County of Cambridge and the Isle of Ely: Volume 3: The City and University of Cambridge. Institute of Historical Research. Archived from the original on 12 June 2012. Retrieved 26 February 2012. ^ Roach, RPC, ed. (1959). The city of Cambridge: Churches; A History of the County of Cambridge and the Isle of Ely: Volume 3, the City and University of Cambridge. London: Victoria County History. pp. 123–132. Archived from the original on 13 September 2016. Retrieved 23 September 2016. ^ Bailey, Simon (18 December 2009). "The hanging of the clerks in 1209". BBC. Retrieved 24 September 2020. ^ "University and Colleges: A Brief History". University of Cambridge. 7 February 2008. Archived from the original on 25 August 2011. Retrieved 13 January 2010. ^ "About the College". Peterhouse College. Archived from the original on 25 January 2010. Retrieved 13 January 2010. ^ a b Ziegler, Philip; Platt, Colin (1998). The Black Death (2nd ed.). London: Penguin. p. 178. ISBN 978-0-14-027524-7. ^ Atkinson, Thomas (1897). Cambridge, Described and Illustrated: Being a Short History of the Town and University. London: Macmillan. p. 41. OCLC 1663499. Archived from the original on 5 April 2016. Retrieved 8 January 2016. The Ward beyond the Bridge, that is, all the town on the Castle side of the river, appears to have been almost entirely destroyed. Most of the people in the parish of All Saints' in Castro died and those that escaped left the neighbourhood for other parishes. ^ Herlihy, David (1997). The Black Death and the Transformation of the West (European History Series). Harvard University Press. p. 70. ISBN 978-0-674-07613-6. Archived from the original on 3 February 2016. Retrieved 25 February 2012. ^ a b "History of the Chapel". King's College, Cambridge. 13 March 2009. Archived from the original on 17 July 2011. Retrieved 19 July 2011. ^ Pennick, Nigel (9 January 2012). Secrets of King's College Chapel. Karnac Books. p. 3. ^ The city of Cambridge: Public health; A History of the County of Cambridge and the Isle of Ely: Volume 3, the City and University of Cambridge. London: Victoria County History. 1959. pp. 101–108. Archived from the original on 23 September 2016. Retrieved 23 September 2016. ^ "Cambridgeshire > Natural History > Cam Valley Walk > Stage 7". BBC Cambridgeshire. Archived from the original on 1 May 2014. Retrieved 23 July 2013. ^ a b c d e f "The city of Cambridge – Modern history | A History of the County of Cambridge and the Isle of Ely: Volume 3: The City and University of Cambridge (1959)". 1959. pp. 15–29. Archived from the original on 12 June 2012. Retrieved 26 February 2012. ^ "The city of Cambridge: Modern history | British History Online". www.british-history.ac.uk. Archived from the original on 6 July 2018. Retrieved 6 July 2018. ^ a b c d J. P. C. Roach (editor) (1959). "The city of Cambridge: Economic history". A History of the County of Cambridge and the Isle of Ely: Volume 3: The City and University of Cambridge. Institute of Historical Research. Archived from the original on 12 June 2012. Retrieved 1 March 2012.CS1 maint: extra text: authors list (link) ^ J. P. C. Roach (editor) (1959). "The city of Cambridge". A History of the County of Cambridge and the Isle of Ely: Volume 3: The City and University of Cambridge. Institute of Historical Research. Archived from the original on 12 June 2012. Retrieved 1 March 2012.CS1 maint: extra text: authors list (link) ^ Brigham, Allan; Wiles, Colin (2006), Bringing it all back home: Changes in Housing and Society 1966-2006, Chartered Institute of Housing, Eastern Branch, archived from the original on 20 December 2016, retrieved 27 April 2016 ^ Wright, A.P.M.; Lewis, C.P. (eds) (1989). Chesterton: Introduction. A History of the County of Cambridge and the Isle of Ely: Volume 9: Chesterton, Northstowe, and Papworth Hundreds. Institute of Historical Research. pp. 5–13. Archived from the original on 5 March 2012. Retrieved 6 March 2012.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: extra text: authors list (link) ^ Shott, Rupert (2009). Rowan's Rule: the biography of the Archbishop. London: Hodder & Stoughton. p. 83. ISBN 978-0-340-95433-1. Archived from the original on 22 June 2016. Retrieved 8 September 2016. ^ "Christ's Lane". Land Securities. n.d. Archived from the original on 7 September 2008. Retrieved 13 January 2010. ^ "Derek Taunt – Obituary". The Daily Telegraph. London. 23 July 2004. Archived from the original on 30 August 2013. Retrieved 26 February 2012. ^ "The Open University in the East of England". 26 November 2013. Archived from the original on 3 February 2017. Retrieved 2 February 2017. ^ "Ceremonial maces, 1207 charter and the city's coat of arms". Cambridge City Council. Archived from the original on 16 October 2015. Retrieved 8 June 2015. ^ "The mayors of Cambridge". Cambridge City Council. Archived from the original on 23 September 2009. Retrieved 4 March 2011. ^ "Elections 2014: Labour takes control of Cambridge City Council". Cambridge News. 23 May 2014. Archived from the original on 25 May 2014. Retrieved 24 May 2014. ^ "Cambridgeshire County Council". BBC News. Archived from the original on 11 October 2018. Retrieved 2 August 2018. ^ "Ordnance Survey". Election maps. Archived from the original on 7 March 2008. Retrieved 17 July 2010. ^ "Cambridge (England, United Kingdom)". Britannica Online Encyclopedia. Archived from the original on 12 January 2010. Retrieved 13 January 2010. ^ a b c "SUDS Design and Adoption Guide" (PDF). 20 December 2016. Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 December 2016. Retrieved 2 April 2018. ^ a b "England's Geology – Cambridgeshire". Natural England. Archived from the original on 21 October 2009. Retrieved 27 February 2012. ^ "CB1 development". Cambridgshire County Council. Archived from the original on 9 October 2010. Retrieved 13 January 2010. ^ "Accordia wins top architectural prize" (Press release). Cambridge City Council. 15 October 2008. Archived from the original on 14 December 2010. Retrieved 13 January 2010. ^ "Vision". Clay Farm. Archived from the original on 9 January 2010. Retrieved 13 January 2010. ^ "Home". Trumpington Meadows Land Company. Archived from the original on 31 August 2009. Retrieved 13 January 2010. ^ "Air Pollution in Cambridge". Cambridge City Council. Archived from the original on 16 November 2018. Retrieved 3 June 2016. ^ "Cambridge, England Köppen Climate Classification (Weatherbase)". Weatherbase. Retrieved 13 November 2018. ^ "Cambridge University Computer Laboratory Digital Technology Group". Archived from the original on 17 October 2014. Retrieved 26 September 2014. ^ "Weather Station, Cambridge University Computer Laboratory Digital Technology Group". Archived from the original on 22 September 2014. Retrieved 26 September 2014. ^ Perring, Franklyn (16 June 1960). "Mapping the Distribution of Flowering Plants". New Scientist: 1525. Archived from the original on 3 February 2016. Retrieved 26 February 2012. ^ "Climate & Soils". Cambridge University Botanic Garden. 2012. Archived from the original on 1 April 2012. Retrieved 26 February 2012. Cambridge is in the driest region of Britain and has a more continental climate than most of Britain. ^ "Our strategy". Cambridge Water. 2012. Archived from the original on 27 March 2012. Retrieved 26 February 2012. We live in one of the driest areas of the UK. The East of England's rainfall of conditions is only half the national average and Cambridge is one of the driest parts of this region. ^ "Climate and Soils". Cambridge University Botanic Garden. Archived from the original on 26 July 2011. Retrieved 21 February 2011. ^ "NIAB weather data". Met Office. Archived from the original on 29 June 2011. Retrieved 4 February 2013. ^ "Hot semi-arid (steppe) climate". www.mindat.org. Retrieved 3 February 2020. ^ "Wettest year since records began". Cambridge University Botanic Garden. Archived from the original on 3 July 2013. Retrieved 4 February 2013. ^ "Historic station data: Cambridge NIAB". Met Office. Archived from the original on 29 June 2011. Retrieved 21 February 2011. ^ "Anomaly details for Station Cambridge (B. GDNS): Mean of daily maximum temperature, July 2006". European Climate Assessment and Dataset. Archived from the original on 24 July 2011. Retrieved 21 February 2011. ^ "UK Climate: July 2008". Met Office. Archived from the original on 29 June 2011. Retrieved 21 February 2011. ^ "Anomaly details for Station Cambridge (B. GDNS): Maximum value of daily maximum temperature, August 2007". European Climate Assessment and Dataset. Archived from the original on 24 July 2011. Retrieved 21 February 2011. ^ "Hottest day of each year from 1875". Trevor Harley. Retrieved 22 April 2020. ^ "New official highest temperature in UK confirmed". Archived from the original on 29 July 2019. Retrieved 29 July 2019. ^ "Climatology details for station CAMBRIDGE (B. GDNS): Summer days (TX > 25 °C)". European Climate Assessment and Dataset. Archived from the original on 22 April 2014. Retrieved 11 September 2012. ^ "Climatology details for station CAMBRIDGE (B. GDNS): Maximum value of daily maximum temperature". European Climate Assessment and Dataset. Archived from the original on 22 April 2014. Retrieved 11 September 2012. ^ "Botanic Garden Extremes 1931–60". Archived from the original on 26 July 2011. Retrieved 21 February 2011. ^ "8 December 1879". Archived from the original on 19 January 2011. Retrieved 21 February 2011. ^ "Coldest temperatures of winter so far". Met Office News Blog. 11 February 2012. Archived from the original on 22 April 2012. Retrieved 27 February 2012. ^ "22nd Jan 2013 Temperatures". Met Office News Blog. 22 January 2013. Archived from the original on 26 January 2013. Retrieved 4 February 2013. ^ "December 2010". Cambridge University Botanic Garden. Archived from the original on 26 July 2011. Retrieved 21 February 2011. ^ "Cambridge 1981–2010 averages". Met Office. Archived from the original on 5 September 2015. Retrieved 11 September 2012. ^ "Climatology details for station CAMBRIDGE (B. GDNS): Frost days (TN < 0 °C)". European Climate Assessment and Dataset. Archived from the original on 22 April 2014. Retrieved 11 September 2012. ^ "Climatology details for station CAMBRIDGE (B. GDNS): Minimum value of daily minimum temperature". European Climate Assessment and Dataset. Archived from the original on 22 April 2014. Retrieved 11 September 2012. ^ "Indices Data - Cambridge (B. Gdns) Station 1639". KNMI. Retrieved 12 March 2019. ^ "Cambridge NIAB 1981–2010 averages". Met Office. Retrieved 12 March 2019. ^ The Wildlife Trust for Bedfordshire, Cambridgeshire, Northamptonshire & Peterborough (September 2006). "CAMBRIDGE CITY NATURE CONSERVATION STRATEGY "ENHANCING BIODIVERSITY"" (PDF). Cambridge City Council. Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 August 2016. Retrieved 16 May 2016. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) ^ "Cambridge City Local Nature Reserves". Cambridge City Council. Archived from the original on 18 August 2016. Retrieved 16 May 2016. ^ Cooper, Anthony J. "The Origins of the Cambridge Green Belt" (PDF). www.cambridge.gov.uk. Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 February 2018. Retrieved 14 February 2018. ^ "Green belt final" (PDF). www.eastcambs.gov.uk. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 February 2018. Retrieved 14 February 2018. ^ "CAMBRIDGE GREEN BELT STUDY A Vision of the Future for Cambridge in its Green Belt Setting" (PDF). www.scambs.gov.uk. Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 February 2018. Retrieved 14 February 2018. ^ "East Cambridgeshire Local Plan - April 2015" (PDF). www.eastcambs.gov.uk. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 February 2018. Retrieved 14 February 2018. ^ "LDA Design - Cambridge Inner Belt Boundary Study" (PDF). www.cambridge.gov.uk. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 February 2018. Retrieved 14 February 2018. ^ UK Census (2011). "Local Area Report – Cambridge BUA (E34004798)". Nomis. Office for National Statistics. Retrieved 30 March 2020. ^ UK Census (2011). "Local Area Report – Cambridge Local Authority (E07000008)". Nomis. Office for National Statistics. Retrieved 30 March 2020. ^ 2001 Census (Ethnic group, Cambridge local authority). Office For National Statistics. ^ "Fact sheet: Ethnicity". University of Cambridge. 26 October 2007. Archived from the original on 1 January 2008. Retrieved 17 January 2008. ^ a b ONS 2001 Census (Approximated Social Grade – Workplace Population, Cambridge local authority) ^ ONS 2001 Census (Qualifications, Cambridge local authority) ^ Ferguson, Donna (4 February 2018). "Cambridge tops the league … as Britain's most unequal city". The Observer. Archived from the original on 29 July 2019. ^ Shennan, Sophie (2 February 2018). "Cambridge ranked most unequal city in the UK". Varsity. Archived from the original on 29 July 2019. ^ Carter, Edmund (1753), The History of the County of Cambridgeshire, archived from the original on 3 February 2016, retrieved 8 January 2016, ...6131 souls; as they were collected from house to house in July and August in the year 1749 ^ "Cambridge Civil Parish". Vision of Britain. Archived from the original on 20 December 2008. Retrieved 26 July 2008. ^ "Cambridge Civil Parish". Vision of Britain. Archived from the original on 20 December 2008. Retrieved 26 July 2008. ^ "Cambridge Civil Parish". Vision of Britain. Archived from the original on 20 December 2008. Retrieved 26 July 2008. ^ Boyd, Stephanie (2005). The Story of Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-62897-6. ^ a b Kimber, Isaac; Kimber, Edward (January 1748). "A description of Cambridge". The London Magazine, or, Gentleman's Monthly Intelligencer. London: R. Baldwin. 17: 64. Archived from the original on 3 February 2016. Retrieved 29 February 2012. ^ Searby, Peter (1997). A History of the University of Cambridge. 3. Cambridge University Press. p. 705. ISBN 978-0-521-35060-0. ^ "Cambridge City – Annual demographic and socio-economic report" (PDF). Cambridgeshire County Council. April 2011. p. 17. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 August 2013. ^ Kiladze, Tim (22 January 2010). "World's Most Beautiful Cities". Forbes. Archived from the original on 29 July 2017. Retrieved 22 August 2017. ^ Gooding, Matt (5 June 2017). "Dramatic increase in tourism's contribution to the Cambridge economy revealed". cambridgenews. Archived from the original on 13 February 2018. Retrieved 12 February 2018. ^ "Science Parks | Cambridge Science Park". United Kingdom Science Park Association. 2012. Archived from the original on 30 January 2012. Retrieved 29 February 2012. many companies on the park have spun out of Cambridge University...the majority of the companies on the Cambridge Science Park have active links and research partnerships with the University ^ "Science Parks | Cambridge Science Park". United Kingdom Science Park Association. 2012. Archived from the original on 30 January 2012. Retrieved 29 February 2012. Cambridge Science Park is Europe's longest-serving and largest centre for commercial research and development... ^ "History". Cambridge Science Park. Archived from the original on 5 February 2012. Retrieved 14 August 2011. ^ "History". St John's Innovation Centre. Archived from the original on 7 July 2011. Retrieved 19 July 2011. ^ "Directory of Cambridge Network Members – Cambridge University Spin Out". Cambridge Network. 2012. Archived from the original on 29 April 2007. Retrieved 29 February 2012. ^ "Cambridge Futures 2 – Report". Cambridgefutures.org. Archived from the original on 30 January 2013. Retrieved 26 March 2013. ^ UK Census 2001 Archived 5 June 2009 at the Wayback Machine ^ Cambridge retains 'cycling capital' title in nationwide survey | Cambridge News | Latest News Headlines From Cambridge City & Cambridgeshire | National News By Archived 19 April 2013 at the Wayback Machine. Cambridge News (16 April 2013). Retrieved on 15 July 2013. ^ Cambridge park-and-ride. Cambridgeshire County Council. Archived 8 March 2013 at the Wayback Machine ^ "The Busway - Routes and Times". Cambridgeshire County Council. Archived from the original on 25 December 2014. Retrieved 29 December 2014. ^ "Cambridge City Airport". cambridgeairport.com. Archived from the original on 18 February 2020. Retrieved 21 March 2020. ^ Fellowes, Reginald B (1948). Railways to Cambridge - actual and proposed) (1976 reprint ed.). Cambridge,UK: Oleander Press. p. 10. ISBN 0-902675-62-1. ^ "Train Timetables" (PDF). Great Northern. Archived (PDF) from the original on 13 January 2018. Retrieved 17 December 2017. ^ Brown, Raymond (21 May 2017). "First train arrives at Cambridge North station - but it took 30 years to get there". Cambridge Evening News. Archived from the original on 21 May 2017. Retrieved 21 May 2017. ^ "PICTURES: First step towards opening of Cambridge's second railway station as work starts on guided busway extension". Cambridge News. 23 July 2014. Archived from the original on 5 September 2014. Retrieved 15 September 2014. ^ "Cambridge's new railway station 'to open in 2015'". Cambridge News. 21 February 2012. Archived from the original on 24 February 2012. Retrieved 27 February 2012. ^ Cox, Tara (16 May 2018). "2025 opening for Cambridge South station is 'unacceptable'". Local World. Archived from the original on 17 May 2018. Retrieved 31 May 2018. ^ "Cambridge South station's preferred location selected". Network Rail. Retrieved 22 June 2020. ^ BBC News ^ "Draft housing strategy 2009–2010" (PDF). Cambridge City Council. Archived from the original (PDF) on 19 March 2012. Retrieved 28 September 2009. ^ "Cambridge". The Complete University Guide. Archived from the original on 14 January 2013. Retrieved 28 September 2009. ^ "Facts and Figures January 2009" (PDF). University of Cambridge: Planning and statistics section. January 2009. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 June 2011. Retrieved 28 September 2009. ^ "Annual Review 2007-8" (PDF). Anglia Ruskin University. Retrieved 28 September 2009. [dead link] ^ "Our schools and colleges". Cambridgeshire County Council. Archived from the original on 2 April 2009. Retrieved 28 September 2009. ^ "Educational establishments in Cambridgeshire". Cambridgeshire County Council. ^ Morgan, John (27 August 2009). "It's a record breaker for GCSE students". Cambridge News. Archived from the original on 29 July 2012. Retrieved 28 September 2009. ^ Foskett, Nicholas (1992). Managing external relations in schools: a practical guide. Routledge. p. 149. ISBN 0-415-06833-9. ^ Davidson, Max (20 May 2006). "City spotlight: Cambridge". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 31 January 2010. Retrieved 28 September 2009. ^ "Cambridge...the birthplace of football?!". BBC. Archived from the original on 17 August 2016. Retrieved 19 October 2006. ^ Conn, David (3 October 2007). "The supporters who took on a property developer and won". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 3 September 2014. Retrieved 3 September 2014. ^ "List of first-class matches on Parker's Piece". Cricketarchive.com. Archived from the original on 19 November 2009. Retrieved 17 July 2010. ^ "About Us". Cambridgeshire CCC. Archived from the original on 17 July 2012. Retrieved 6 January 2009. ^ "Cambridgeshire Cricket Association". Cambridgeshire CA. Archived from the original on 5 August 2011. Retrieved 5 October 2011. ^ Jackson, Steve (5 September 2008). "Cambridge RUFC season preview". BBC Sport. BBC. Retrieved 16 September 2016. ^ Taylor, Mark (1 June 2016). "Familiar faces and new tests: Cambridge Rugby Club's National League 1 fixtures for 2016/17". Cambridge News. Retrieved 16 September 2016. [permanent dead link] ^ "Cambridge Lions suffer loss at Southend Spartans in East Rugby League". Cambridge News. 15 June 2016. Retrieved 16 September 2016. [permanent dead link] ^ "Early CRA History". Cambridgeshire Rowing Association. Archived from the original on 19 May 2009. Retrieved 14 January 2009. ^ "Parkside Pools". Cambridge City Council. Archived from the original on 17 June 2016. Retrieved 20 April 2016. ^ Barnes, Julia (1988). Daily Mirror Greyhound Fact File, page 411. Ringpress Books. ISBN 0-948955-15-5. ^ "Cambridge". Greyhound Racing Times. ^ "Cambridge University Real Tennis Club". Curtc.net. Archived from the original on 29 December 2010. Retrieved 17 July 2010. ^ "Triple-A South, Double-A Central and Northern Conference 2016 schedules announced". British Baseball Federation. 18 February 2016. Archived from the original on 12 October 2016. Retrieved 12 October 2016. ^ "Team Cambridge". Team Cambridge. Archived from the original on 21 August 2011. Retrieved 17 July 2010. ^ "Cambridge CC". Cambridge-cycling-club.org.uk. Archived from the original on 22 May 2010. Retrieved 17 July 2010. ^ "Cambridge & Coleridge AC official website". Archived from the original on 3 March 2011. Retrieved 20 March 2011. ^ "Uk Roller Derby". Uk Roller Derby. Archived from the original on 24 October 2011. Retrieved 31 October 2011. ^ "Cambridge Speedway". www.speedwayplus.com. Archived from the original on 11 October 2016. Retrieved 20 September 2016. ^ "Cambridge Arts Theatre Website". Cambridgeartstheatre.com. Archived from the original on 12 July 2010. Retrieved 17 July 2010. ^ a b "The History of the Cambridge Corn Exchange". Cambridge City Council. Archived from the original on 29 August 2008. Retrieved 2 March 2009. ^ "Our Spaces". junction.co.uk. Archived from the original on 12 February 2012. Retrieved 28 February 2012. J2 is the venue for our theatre, dance, family theatre and comedy programme ^ a b J P C Roach, ed. (1959). "The University of Cambridge – The Fitzwilliam Museum". A History of the County of Cambridge and the Isle of Ely: Volume 3, the City and University of Cambridge: 326–327. Archived from the original on 24 July 2014. Retrieved 17 May 2016. ^ "Museum of Cambridge: The life and history of the people of Cambridge". Fen Museum Partnership. Archived from the original on 20 December 2016. Retrieved 13 September 2016. ^ "Cambridge Centre of Computing History opens". BBC News. 30 July 2013. Archived from the original on 20 February 2015. Retrieved 13 September 2016. ^ The Soft Boys at AllMusic ^ Ezio at AllMusic ^ "The Broken Family Band biography". xfm.co.uk. Archived from the original on 20 December 2008. Retrieved 13 August 2008. ^ Rivadavia, Eduardo. "Uncle Acid and the Deadbeats: Blood Lust". AllMusic. Archived from the original on 5 January 2013. Retrieved 2 June 2013. ^ "The Official Kings Singers Website :History". kingssingers.com. 2012. Archived from the original on 10 October 2011. Retrieved 25 February 2012. The group takes its name from King's College Cambridge, where Martin Lane, Al Hume, Alastair Thompson, Richard Salter, Simon Carrington and Brian Kay were choral scholars. ^ Boo Hewerdine at AllMusic ^ Cheal, David (13 April 2001). "Muse: profile of the band". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 3 March 2016. Retrieved 28 February 2012. ^ "Tom Robinson is showing a new generation the power of the protest song". The Independent. Archived from the original on 16 February 2016. Retrieved 11 February 2016. ^ "Biography". olivia-newtonjohn.com. Archived from the original on 19 December 2008. Retrieved 9 December 2008. ^ Jane, Sarah (2 November 2012). "BBC News – Mercury Prize: Alt-J album An Awesome Wave wins award". BBC. Archived from the original on 16 January 2013. Retrieved 26 March 2013. ^ "Cambridge Music Festival – British Arts Festivals Association". BAFA. Retrieved 29 February 2020. ^ "Cambridge Summer Music Festival – British Arts Festivals Association". BAFA. Retrieved 29 February 2020. ^ Collins, Ruthie (3 January 2013). "Cambridge art scene: change in the air". The guardian. Guardian Media Group. Archived from the original on 27 April 2016. Retrieved 20 April 2016. ^ "cultunet". cultunet.com. 3 December 2012. Archived from the original on 29 April 2014. Retrieved 3 February 2013. ^ "About the gallery". Anglia Ruskin University. Archived from the original on 9 June 2016. Retrieved 18 May 2016. ^ "Cambridge Midsummer Fair". National Fairground Archive, University of Sheffield. Archived from the original on 30 June 2016. Retrieved 26 April 2016. ^ "Cambridge & District CAMRA Winter Ale Festival 2010". Cambridgebeerfestival.com. Archived from the original on 28 January 2011. Retrieved 13 January 2010. ^ "Cambridge Summer Music Festival". The Gramophone. Retrieved 20 October 2010. ^ "About the Festival". The Cambridge Shakespeare Festival. Archived from the original on 9 February 2012. Retrieved 27 February 2012. ^ "Cambridge Film Festival". Festival Focus. Archived from the original on 2 July 2008. Retrieved 21 July 2008. ^ "University of Cambridge Science Festival 2011". BBC News. Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 21 March 2015. ^ Blair-Underwood, Alison (2012). "Open account - A memoir: the Cambridge Poetry Festival". Blackbox Manifold, Issue 9: Peter Robinson at Sixty. Blackbox Manifold. Archived from the original on 22 March 2013. Retrieved 6 June 2013. ^ Rabbett, Abigail (1 December 2017). "All you need to know about the 2017 Mill Road Winter Fair". Cambridge News. Archived from the original on 10 January 2018. Retrieved 31 May 2018. ^ Rabbett, Abigail (17 January 2018). "All you need to know about Cambridge's e-Luminate festival". Cambridge News. Archived from the original on 15 June 2018. Retrieved 31 May 2018. ^ "Big Weekend". Visit Cambridge. Cambridge City Council. Archived from the original on 4 April 2019. Retrieved 31 May 2018. ^ Description, poster, and images, 1969 Cambridge Free Festival, Midsummer Common, 8-11 June 1969. Performers: David Bowie, King Crimson, Roy Harper, and others. Retrieved 15 July 2020. ^ Concert poster: The Cambridge Free Festival, Midsummer Common, 8-11th June 1969. Performers: David Bowie, King Crimson, Roy Harper, and others. Retrieved 15 July 2020. ^ Invitation to attend and explanation of event: The Cambridge Free Festival, Midsummer Common, 8-11th June 1969. Performers: David Bowie, King Crimson, Roy Harper, and others. Retrieved 15 July 2020. ^ Programme of performers, 8 and 9 June 1969. The Cambridge Free Festival, Midsummer Common, 8-11th June 1969. Performers: David Bowie, King Crimson, Roy Harper, and others. Retrieved 15 July 2020. ^ Programme of performers, 10 and 11 June 1969. The Cambridge Free Festival, Midsummer Common, 8-11th June 1969. Performers: David Bowie, King Crimson, Roy Harper, and others. Retrieved 15 July 2020. ^ 1970 Cambridge Free Festival, Coldham's Common, 5 August 1970. Edgar Broughton, Arthur Brown's Kingdom Come, Demon Fuzz, Black Widow, Elder Kindred. Retrieved 15 July 2020. ^ Cambridge Free Festival, Coldham's Common, 12th/13th June 1971. Spontaneous Combustion scheduled Saturday afternoon and UFO Saturday evening, 12 June 1971, were among the 23 scheduled performers. Retrieved 15 July 2020. ^ Concert line-up, Cambridge Free Festival, Coldham's Common, 12th/13th June 1971. Spontaneous Combustion scheduled Saturday afternoon and UFO Saturday evening, 12 June 1971, were among the 23 scheduled performers. Retrieved 15 July 2020. ^ Concert poster: Cambridge Free Festival, Coldham's Common, 12th/13th June 1971. Spontaneous Combustion scheduled Saturday afternoon and UFO Saturday evening, 12 June 1971, were among the 23 scheduled performers. Retrieved 15 July 2020 ^ "They were defeated". Evening Post. Wellington, NZ. 24 December 1932. p. 7. Archived from the original on 21 September 2011. Retrieved 7 October 2010. ^ Owen, Katie (29 August 2004). "A Daily Sense of Danger – Case Histories by Kate Atkinson". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 11 June 2011. Retrieved 25 February 2011. ^ "Woman's Hour -Rebecca Stott on 'Ghostwalk'". BBC Radio 4. 2012. Archived from the original on 28 July 2012. Retrieved 25 February 2012. ^ Chainey, Graham (1995) [1985]. A Literary History of Cambridge. Cambridge. ISBN 0-907115-25-X. ^ Garrett, Martin (2004). Cambridge: a Cultural and Literary History. Oxford. ISBN 1-902669-79-7. ^ "GREGORY, SUSANNA | List of Writers". literaturewales.org. Archived from the original on 31 August 2013. Retrieved 25 February 2012. ^ "Some References to Cambridge Night Climbing". Archived from the original on 9 February 2009. Retrieved 26 August 2010. ^ Crowley, Joseph N. (1994). No equal in the world: an interpretation of the academic presidency. Reno, NV: University of Nevada Press. p. 167. ISBN 978-0-87417-237-9. Retrieved 25 February 2012. ^ "Grantchester – Drama Series Hits ITV 1". Visit Cambridge. Cambridge City Council. Archived from the original on 1 April 2019. Retrieved 31 May 2018. ^ "East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust". National Health Service. Archived from the original on 27 September 2011. Retrieved 28 September 2009. ^ "Brookfields Hospital". NHS.UK. Archived from the original on 7 February 2019. Retrieved 4 February 2019. ^ "Contact us". Cambridgeshire Constabulary. Archived from the original on 15 September 2009. Retrieved 28 September 2009. ^ "Cambridge fire station". Cambridgehsire Fire and Rescue. Archived from the original on 28 September 2009. Retrieved 28 September 2009. ^ "About Us". Cambridge Water Company. 2012. Archived from the original on 24 February 2012. Retrieved 26 February 2012. ^ "About you: water charges". Cambridge Water. Archived from the original on 16 September 2009. Retrieved 28 September 2009. Anglian Water supply your sewerage services. Cambridge Water bills and collects on behalf of Anglian Water. ^ "National Grid: Distribution Network Operator (DNO) Companies". nationalgrid.com. 2012. Archived from the original on 20 February 2012. Retrieved 26 February 2012. Distribution Network Operator (DNO) Companies ^ Jones, Will (6 March 2008). "The SmartLIFE Sustainable Skills Centre in Cambridge". Building.co.uk. Retrieved 28 September 2009. ^ CEGB Statistical Yearbook 1965, CEGB, London ^ a b Roach, J.P.C., ed. (1959). "The city of Cambridge: Public buildings". A History of the County of Cambridge and the Isle of Ely: Volume 3: The City and University of Cambridge. Institute of Historical Research. Archived from the original on 4 June 2011. Retrieved 19 July 2011. ^ a b "Revamped Central Library ready to open". Cambridge News. 25 September 2009. Archived from the original on 26 September 2012. Retrieved 28 September 2009. ^ Elliott, Chris (17 April 2009). "Library is hit by new delay fear". Cambridge News. Archived from the original on 26 September 2012. Retrieved 28 September 2009. ^ "Find a library". Cambridgeshire County Council. Archived from the original on 9 February 2018. Retrieved 9 February 2018. ^ "A brief history of the Diocese of Ely". The Church of England Diocese of Ely. Archived from the original on 13 May 2016. Retrieved 26 April 2016. ^ "EERA 61 Social Strategy" (PDF). East of England Regional Assembly. Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 June 2011. Retrieved 17 July 2010. ^ "Great St Mary's". Great St Mary's Ministry. Archived from the original on 1 August 2012. Retrieved 21 March 2012. ^ "Chapel". St Edmund's College, Cambridge. 12 May 2008. Archived from the original on 23 September 2008. Retrieved 17 October 2008. ^ "Diocese of East Anglia". Catholic Directory. Archived from the original on 6 January 2015. Retrieved 6 January 2015. ^ "Parishes – Diocese of Sourozh". Russian Orthodox Diocese of Sourozh. Archived from the original on 5 March 2012. Retrieved 21 March 2012. ^ "The Greek Orthodox Church of St. Anthanasius and St. Clement". Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of Thyateira and Great Britain. Archived from the original on 14 March 2012. Retrieved 21 March 2012. ^ "St. John the Evangelist Romanian Orthodox Parish in Cambridge". Retrieved 30 November 2019. ^ "Quakers in Cambridge". Cambridge Quakers. Archived from the original on 25 July 2011. Retrieved 21 March 2012. ^ "Welcome to CTJC". Cambridge Traditional Jewish Congregation. Archived from the original on 27 December 2011. Retrieved 28 February 2012. We share our shul building with the students, who run Shabbat services during term-time. ^ "Cambridge University | Union of Jewish Students". Cambridge University Union of Jewish Students. Archived from the original on 26 July 2012. Retrieved 28 February 2012. The Cambridge Traditional Jewish Congregation hold Orthodox services at Thompsons Lane which are run by the students during term time and the residents in the vacation. ^ "Home of its own: Cambridge Synagogue has a new base". BBC News. 12 April 2010. Archived from the original on 4 August 2012. Retrieved 28 February 2012. ^ "Beth Shalom Reform Synagogue – Cambridge – A New Synagogue". beth-shalom.org.uk. Archived from the original on 14 September 2016. Retrieved 16 July 2016. Our new Synagogue and Community Centre is an environmentally-friendly, economical and flexible space... ^ "Cambridge Central Mosque – Home". Cambridge Central Mosque. Retrieved 28 November 2019. ^ Extance, Rachel (6 May 2008). "Mosque site hunt is over". Cambridge News. Archived from the original on 5 January 2009. Retrieved 21 March 2012. ^ "'Eco mosque' opens for worshippers". 24 April 2019. Retrieved 28 November 2019. ^ "Cambridge Mosque". www.cambridgemosque.com. Retrieved 28 November 2019. ^ "Omar Faruque Mosque - North Cambridge Mosque, UK". www.omarfaruquemosque.org.uk. Retrieved 28 November 2019. ^ "Omar Faruque Mosque and Cultural Centre". Salatomatic. Archived from the original on 15 July 2011. Retrieved 20 July 2010. ^ "History of the Barnwell or Festival Theatre". Cambridge Buddhist Centre. Archived from the original on 6 October 2009. Retrieved 13 January 2010. ^ "Meditation and Local Groups". Retrieved 29 October 2020. ^ "The Indian Community and Culture Association of Cambridge (ICCA)". Bharat Bhavan Indian cultural centre. Archived from the original on 19 May 2012. Retrieved 3 March 2012. ^ "The Shrine". Bharat Bhavan Indian cultural centre. Archived from the original on 19 May 2012. Retrieved 3 March 2012. ^ a b "Twinning". City of Heidelberg. Archived from the original on 18 July 2006. Retrieved 12 November 2009. Further reading[edit] See also: Bibliography of the history of Cambridge Bowes, Robert (1894), A catalogue of books printed at or relating to the University, town & county of Cambridge, from 1521 to 1893, Cambridge: Macmillan & Bowes, OCLC 1064186, OL 23284674M Rawle, Tim (author and photographer), John Adamson (editor). Cambridge (new ed. with foreword by William Bortrick). Cambridge: The Oxbridge Portfolio (2016), 204 pp. ISBN 978-0-9572867-2-6 External links[edit] Wikiquote has quotations related to: Cambridge Wikimedia Commons has media related to Cambridge. Wikivoyage has a travel guide for Cambridge. Cambridge City Council The Cambridge Market Place Webcam Cambridgeshire Association for Local History Cambridgeshire Community Archives The official tourism website for Cambridge v t e Ceremonial county of Cambridgeshire Unitary authorities City of Peterborough Major settlements Cambridge Chatteris Ely Godmanchester Huntingdon March Peterborough Ramsey St Ives St Neots Soham Whittlesey Wisbech Yaxley See also: List of civil parishes in Cambridgeshire Rivers Great Ouse (Old Bedford New Bedford Cam Kym Lark Little Ouse) Nene Stour Welland Topics Parliamentary constituencies Places Population of major settlements SSSIs Country houses Churches Grade I listed buildings History Lord Lieutenants Custodes Rotulorum High Sheriffs Schools Museums Diocese of Ely Diocese of Peterborough Isle of Ely Cambridgeshire and Isle of Ely Soke of Peterborough Huntingdon and Peterborough v t e Districts of the East of England Bedfordshire Bedford Central Bedfordshire Luton Cambridgeshire Cambridge East Cambridgeshire Fenland Huntingdonshire Peterborough South Cambridgeshire Essex Basildon Braintree Brentwood Castle Point Chelmsford Colchester Epping Forest Harlow Maldon Rochford Southend-on-Sea Tendring Thurrock Uttlesford Hertfordshire Broxbourne Dacorum East Hertfordshire Hertsmere North Hertfordshire St Albans Stevenage Three Rivers Watford Welwyn Hatfield Norfolk Breckland Broadland Great Yarmouth King's Lynn and West Norfolk North Norfolk Norwich South Norfolk Suffolk Babergh East Suffolk Ipswich Mid Suffolk West Suffolk v t e Cities of the United Kingdom England Bath Birmingham Bradford Brighton and Hove Bristol Cambridge Canterbury Carlisle Chelmsford Chester Chichester Coventry Derby Durham Ely Exeter Gloucester Hereford Kingston upon Hull Lancaster Leeds Leicester Lichfield Lincoln Liverpool City of London Manchester Newcastle upon Tyne Norwich Nottingham Oxford Peterborough Plymouth Portsmouth Preston Ripon St Albans Salford Salisbury Sheffield Southampton Stoke-on-Trent Sunderland Truro Wakefield Wells Westminster Winchester Wolverhampton Worcester York Scotland Aberdeen Dundee Edinburgh Glasgow Inverness Perth Stirling Wales Bangor Cardiff Newport St Asaph St Davids Swansea Northern Ireland Armagh Belfast Derry Lisburn Newry Coordinates: 52°12′19″N 0°07′09″E / 52.20528°N 0.11917°E / 52.20528; 0.11917 Authority control GND: 4009351-7 LCCN: n81110508 MBAREA: 11ba7f4f-3fb9-4b4b-a72f-ab1cd9c37d99 NARA: 10045640 NDL: 00628477 NKC: ge128903 VIAF: 153543201 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n81110508 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cambridge&oldid=996454772" Categories: Cambridge Cities in the East of England Towns in Cambridgeshire County towns in England University towns in the United Kingdom Non-metropolitan districts of Cambridgeshire Unparished areas in Cambridgeshire Hidden categories: Pages with non-numeric formatnum arguments Articles with Latin-language sources (la) Webarchive template wayback links CS1: Julian–Gregorian uncertainty CS1 maint: extra text: authors list CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list CS1 errors: missing periodical All articles with dead external links Articles with dead external links from June 2016 Articles with dead external links from March 2018 Articles with permanently dead external links Use dmy dates from January 2020 Use British English from May 2020 Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata Articles with OS grid coordinates Articles containing Latin-language text Commons category link is on Wikidata Coordinates on Wikidata Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with MusicBrainz area identifiers Wikipedia articles with NARA identifiers Wikipedia articles with NDL identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikinews Wikiquote Wikivoyage Languages Afrikaans Alemannisch አማርኛ Ænglisc العربية Aragonés Արեւմտահայերէն Asturianu Azərbaycanca تۆرکجه বাংলা Bân-lâm-gú Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ Български Bosanski Brezhoneg Català Cebuano Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Estremeñu Euskara فارسی Føroyskt Français Frysk Gaeilge Gàidhlig Galego 客家語/Hak-kâ-ngî 한국어 Հայերեն हिन्दी Hrvatski Ido Bahasa Indonesia Interlingua Interlingue Íslenska Italiano עברית ಕನ್ನಡ ქართული Kiswahili Latina Latviešu Lëtzebuergesch Lietuvių Ligure Lumbaart Magyar Македонски മലയാളം मराठी مصرى مازِرونی Bahasa Melayu မြန်မာဘာသာ Nederlands 日本語 Нохчийн Norsk bokmål Norsk nynorsk Nouormand Occitan Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча ਪੰਜਾਬੀ پنجابی Piemontèis Polski Português Română Runa Simi Русский Scots Shqip Sicilianu සිංහල Simple English Slovenčina Slovenščina Ślůnski کوردی Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Tagalog தமிழ் Татарча/tatarça ไทย Тоҷикӣ Türkçe Українська اردو ئۇيغۇرچە / Uyghurche Vepsän kel’ Tiếng Việt Volapük Winaray 吴语 ייִדיש 粵語 Zazaki Žemaitėška 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 26 December 2020, at 18:38 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2353 ---- Marcus Junius Brutus - Wikipedia Marcus Junius Brutus From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search This article is about the assassin of Julius Caesar. For other people with the same name, see Brutus (disambiguation). Marcus Junius Brutus Brutus in a coin issued shortly before his death Born Late 85 BC[1] Died 23 October 42 BC (aged 42/43) Near Philippi, Macedonia Cause of death Suicide Nationality Roman Other names Quintus Servilius Caepio Brutus Occupation Politician, jurist, military commander Known for Assassination of Julius Caesar Et tu, Brute? Office Governor of Cisalpine Gaul (47–45 BC) Praetor (44 BC) Consul designate (41 BC) Political party Optimates Spouse(s) Claudia Porcia Parent(s) M. Junius Brutus and Servilia Relatives Cato of Utica (uncle) Quintus Servilius Caepio (uncle and adoptive father) Marcus Junius Brutus (/ˈbruːtəs/; 85 BC – 23 October 42 BC), often referred to simply as Brutus, was a Roman senator and the most famous of the assassins of Julius Caesar. After being adopted by an uncle, he used the name Quintus Servilius Caepio Brutus, but subsequently returned to his birth name. Brutus was close to General Julius Caesar, the leader of the Populares faction. However, Caesar's attempts to assume greater power for himself put him at greater odds with the Roman elite and members of the Senate. Brutus eventually came to oppose Caesar and fought on the side of the Optimates faction, led by Pompey, against Caesar's forces in the Civil War (49–45 BC). Pompey was defeated at the Battle of Pharsalus in 48 BC, after which Brutus surrendered to Caesar, who granted him amnesty. However, the underlying political tensions that led to the war had not been resolved. Due to Caesar's increasingly monarchical behavior, several senators, calling themselves "Liberators", plotted to assassinate him. They recruited Brutus, who took a leading role in the assassination, which was carried out successfully on 15 March 44 BC. The Senate, at the request of the Consul Mark Antony, granted amnesty to the assassins. However, a popular uprising forced Brutus and his brother-in-law, fellow assassin Gaius Cassius Longinus, to leave the City of Rome. In 43 BC Octavian, Caesar's adoptive son, became consul and immediately after taking office passed a resolution declaring Brutus and the other conspirators murderers. This led to a second civil war, in which Antony and Octavian fought the Liberatores led by Brutus and Cassius. The former decisively defeated the outnumbered armies of Brutus and Cassius at the Battle of Philippi in October 42 BC. After the battle, Brutus committed suicide. His name has since become synonymous with acts of intimate public betrayal or treason, and is perhaps only rivaled in this regard by the name of Judas. Contents 1 Early life 2 Military career 3 Assassination of Julius Caesar 4 Liberators' civil war 5 Chronology 6 Legacy 6.1 Influence 6.2 Fiction 7 See also 8 References 9 Bibliography 10 Further reading 11 External links Early life[edit] Marcus Junius Brutus belonged to the illustrious plebeian gens Junia. Its semi-legendary founder was Lucius Junius Brutus, who played a pivotal role during the overthrow of Tarquinius Superbus, the last Roman King, and was later one of the two first consuls of the new Roman Republic in 509 BC. Brutus' homonymous father was tribune of the plebs in 83, but he was put to death by Pompey in 77 for having participated in the rebellion of Marcus Aemilius Lepidus. He had married Servilia of the Servilii Caepiones, who was the half-sister of Cato the Younger, and later Julius Caesar's mistress.[2] Some sources refer to the possibility of Caesar being Brutus' real father,[3] despite Caesar being only fifteen years old when Brutus was born. Brutus' uncle, Quintus Servilius Caepio, adopted him posthumously in about 59 BC, and Brutus was known officially for a time as Quintus Servilius Caepio Brutus before he reverted to using his birth-name. Following Caesar's assassination in 44 BC, Brutus revived his adoptive name in order to illustrate his links to another famous tyrannicide, Gaius Servilius Ahala, from whom he was descended.[4][5] Brutus held his uncle in high regard[6] and his political career started when he became an assistant to Cato, during his governorship of Cyprus.[7] During this time, he enriched himself by lending money at high rates of interest. Brutus was also active in the province of Cilicia, in the year before Marcus Tullius Cicero was proconsul there; Cicero documents how Brutus profited from money lending to the provincials in his Letters.[8] He returned to Rome a rich man, where he married Claudia Pulchra.[9] From his first appearance in the Senate, Brutus aligned with the Optimates (the conservative faction) against the First Triumvirate of Marcus Licinius Crassus, Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus, and Gaius Julius Caesar. Marcus Brutus belonged to the last generation of Roman nobiles who came of age and began a political career before the collapse of the Republic. His peers included Mark Antony, Publius Licinius Crassus, his distant cousin Decimus Junius Brutus Albinus, and Gaius Cassius Longinus. Military career[edit] Marble bust, so-called Brutus, at the Palazzo Massimo alle Terme in the National Museum of Rome When Caesar's Civil War broke out in 49 BC between Pompey and Caesar, Brutus followed his old enemy and the present leader of the Optimates, Pompey. When the Battle of Pharsalus began on August 9, Caesar ordered his officers to take Brutus prisoner if he gave himself up voluntarily, but to leave him alone and do him no harm if he persisted in fighting against capture.[10] Caesar's concern, given that he and Brutus' mother Servilia had been lovers in their youth, was that Brutus might be his biological son. Indeed, he and Brutus enjoyed a close relationship at this time. Even when Brutus joined Pompey the Great to fight with Caesar and his soldiers, Caesar's main focus was Pompey, but he demanded Brutus be captured alive.[11] After the defeat of the Optimates at the Battle of Pharsalus, Brutus surrendered and wrote to Caesar with apologies. Caesar immediately forgave him. Caesar then accepted him into his inner circle and made him governor of Gaul when he left for Africa in pursuit of Cato and Metellus Scipio. In 45 BC, Caesar nominated Brutus to serve as urban praetor for the following year. Also, in June 45 BC, Brutus divorced his wife and married his first cousin, Porcia Catonis, Cato's daughter.[12][13] According to Cicero the marriage caused a semi-scandal as Brutus failed to state a valid reason for his divorce from Claudia other than he wished to marry Porcia.[14] The marriage also caused a rift between Brutus and his mother, who was resentful of the affection Brutus had for Porcia.[15] Assassination of Julius Caesar[edit] Main article: Assassination of Julius Caesar Death of Caesar by Vincenzo Camuccini Around this time many senators began to fear Caesar's growing power, following his appointment as dictator in perpetuity.[16] The other senators persuaded Brutus to join the conspiracy against Caesar.[17] Eventually, Brutus decided to move against Caesar after Caesar's alleged king-like behavior prompted him to take action.[18][19] His wife was the only woman privy to the plot.[20][21] The conspirators planned to carry out their plot on the Ides of March (March 15) that same year. On that day, Caesar was delayed going to the Senate because his wife Calpurnia tried to convince him not to go.[22] The conspirators feared the plot had been found out.[23] Brutus persisted, however, waiting for Caesar at the Senate, and allegedly still chose to remain even when a messenger brought him news that would otherwise have caused him to leave.[24] When Caesar finally did come to the Senate, he was distracted by Tillius Cimber, who presented Caesar with a request to free his exiled brother. Caesar dismissed him, and Cimber subsequently grabbed his toga. "Why this violence?" Caesar asked.[25] At this, the conspirators attacked Caesar. Publius Servilius Casca Longus was allegedly the first to attack him, with a stab to the shoulder, which Caesar blocked.[26] However, upon seeing Brutus was with the conspirators, Caesar covered his face with his toga and resigned himself to his fate.[27] The conspirators attacked in such numbers that they even wounded one another. Brutus is said to have been wounded in the hand and in the legs.[28][29] After the assassination, the Senate passed an amnesty on the assassins. This amnesty was proposed by Caesar's friend and co-consul Mark Antony. Nonetheless, uproar among the population against the assassins caused Brutus and the conspirators to leave Rome. Brutus settled in Crete from 44 to 42 BC.[30][citation needed] Marcus Junius Brutus Liberators' civil war[edit] Brutus and his companions after the battle of Philippi Main article: Liberators' civil war In 43 BC, after Octavian received his consulship from the Roman Senate, one of his first actions was to have the people who had assassinated Julius Caesar declared murderers and enemies of the state.[31] Cicero, angry at Octavian, wrote a letter to Brutus explaining that the forces of Octavian and Mark Antony were divided. Antony had laid siege to the province of Gaul, where he wanted a governorship. In response to this siege, Octavian rallied his troops and fought a series of battles, culminating in the Battle of Mutina, in which Antony was defeated.[32] Upon hearing that neither Mark Antony nor Octavian had an army large enough to defend Rome, Brutus rallied his troops, which totalled about 17 legions. When Octavian heard that Brutus was on his way to Rome, he made peace with Antony.[33] Their armies, which together totalled about 19 legions, marched to meet Brutus and his ally, fellow assassin Gaius Cassius Longinus, thus beginning the Liberators' civil war. The two sides met in two engagements known as the Battle of Philippi. The first was fought on October 3, 42 BC, in which Brutus defeated Octavian's forces, although Cassius was defeated by Antony's forces, and subsequently committed suicide. The second engagement was fought on October 23, and ended in Brutus' defeat. EID MAR ("Ides of March") denarius, issued by Marcus Junius Brutus in 43/42 BC. The obverse of the coin features a portrait of Marcus Brutus. The inscription reads BRVT IMP L PLAET CEST, which means Brutus, Imperator, Lucius Plaetorius Cestianus. Lucius Plaetorius Cestianus was the moneyer who actually managed the mint workers who produced the coin. The two daggers on the reverse differ to show more than one person was involved in the slaying. The cap is a pileus (liberty cap) that in Roman times was given to slaves on the day of their emancipation, or freedom from slavery. In the context of the assassination, Brutus is making it clear the killers were defending the Republic and its people from Caesar's attempt to attain kingship. A gold aureus with the same design was also minted. Both coins are exceptionally rare.[34] After the defeat, Brutus fled into the nearby hills with only about four legions. Knowing his army had been defeated and that he would be captured, he committed suicide by running into his own sword, which was held by two of his men. Among his last words were, according to Plutarch, "By all means must we fly; not with our feet, however, but with our hands". Brutus also uttered the well-known verse calling down a curse upon Antony (Plutarch repeats this from the memoirs of Publius Volumnius): Forget not, Zeus, the author of these crimes (in the Dryden translation this passage is given as Punish, great Jove, the author of these ills).[35] Plutarch wrote that, according to Volumnius, Brutus repeated two verses, but Volumnius was only able to recall the one quoted. Mark Antony, as a show of great respect, ordered Brutus' body to be wrapped in Antony's most expensive purple mantle (this was later stolen, and Antony had the thief executed). Brutus was cremated, and his ashes were sent to his mother, Servilia.[36] His wife Porcia was reported to have committed suicide upon hearing of her husband's death, although, according to Plutarch (Brutus 53 para 2), there is some dispute as to whether this is the case. Plutarch states that there was a letter in existence allegedly written by Brutus mourning the manner of her death.[37][38][39] Chronology[edit] 85 BC: Brutus was born in Rome to Marcus Junius Brutus The Elder and Servilia. 58 BC: He was made assistant to Cato, governor of Cyprus, which helped him start his political career. 53 BC: He was given the quaestorship in Cilicia. 49 BC: Brutus followed Pompey to Greece during the civil war against Caesar. 48 BC: Brutus was pardoned by Caesar. 46 BC: He was made governor of Gaul. 45 BC: He was made Praetor. 44 BC: Murdered Caesar with other liberatores; went to Athens and then to Crete. 42 BC: Battle with Mark Antony's forces and suicide. Legacy[edit] This was the noblest Roman of them all: All the conspirators save only he Did that they did in envy of great Caesar; He only, in a general honest thought And common good to all, made one of them. His life was gentle, and the elements So mix'd in him that Nature might stand up And say to all the world "This was a man!" William Shakespeare, Julius Caesar, Act 5, Scene 5 (Mark Antony) Influence[edit] Brutus by Michelangelo Buonarroti The phrase Sic semper tyrannis! ["thus, ever (or always), to tyrants!"] is attributed to Brutus at Caesar's assassination. The phrase is also the official motto of the Commonwealth of Virginia. In 1787, the Anti-Federalist Papers were written under the pseudonym "Brutus" in reference to Caesar's assassin who tried to preserve the Republic. John Wilkes Booth, the assassin of Abraham Lincoln, claimed to be inspired by Brutus. Booth's father, Junius Brutus Booth, was named for Brutus, and Booth (as Mark Antony) and his brother Edwin (as Brutus) had performed in a production of Julius Caesar in New York City just six months before the assassination. On the night of the assassination, Booth is alleged to have shouted "Sic semper tyrannis" while leaping to the stage of Ford's Theater. Lamenting the negative reaction to his deed, Booth wrote in his journal on April 21, 1865, while on the run, "[W]ith every man's hand against me, I am here in despair. And why; For doing what Brutus was honored for ... And yet I for striking down a greater tyrant than they ever knew am looked upon as a common cutthroat." Booth was also known to be greatly attracted to Caesar himself, having played both Brutus and Caesar upon various stages.[40] Fiction[edit] In Dante's Inferno, Brutus is one of three people deemed sinful enough to be chewed in one of the three mouths of Satan, in the very center of Hell, for all eternity. The other two are Cassius, who was Brutus's fellow conspirator, and Judas Iscariot (Canto XXXIV). Dante condemned these three in the afterlife for being treacherous to their benefactors. William Shakespeare's play Julius Caesar depicts Brutus' internal struggles, his assassination of Caesar with the other conspirators, and their subsequent downfall. In the final scene, Mark Antony describes Brutus as "the noblest Roman of them all", for he was the only conspirator who acted for the good of Rome. In the play, the dying Caesar says "Et tu, Brute?" ("You too, Brutus?"), although they are not his last words, and the sources describing Caesar's death disagree about what his last words were. The 1911 Italian silent film Brutus portrays the life of Brutus. The Ides of March is an epistolary novel by Thornton Wilder dealing with characters and events leading to, and culminating in, the assassination of Julius Caesar. In the Masters of Rome novels of Colleen McCullough, Brutus is portrayed as a timid intellectual whose relationship with Caesar is deeply complex. He resents Caesar for breaking his marriage arrangement with Caesar's daughter, Julia, whom Brutus deeply loved, so that she could be married instead to Pompey the Great. However, Brutus enjoys Caesar's favor after he receives a pardon for fighting with Republican forces against Caesar at the Battle of Pharsalus. In the lead-up to the Ides of March, Cassius and Trebonius use him as a figurehead because of his family connections to the founder of the Republic. He appears in Fortune's Favourites, Caesar's Women, Caesar and The October Horse. Brutus is an occasional supporting character in Asterix comics, most notably Asterix and Son in which he is the main antagonist. The character appears in the first three live Asterix film adaptations – though briefly in the first two – Asterix and Obelix vs Caesar (played by Didier Cauchy) and Asterix at the Olympic Games. In the latter film, he is portrayed as a comical villain by Belgian actor Benoît Poelvoorde: he is a central character to the film, even though he was not depicted in the original Asterix at the Olympic Games comic book. Following sources cited in Plutarch, he is implied in that film to be Julius Caesar's biological son. In the TV series Rome, Brutus, portrayed by Tobias Menzies, is depicted as a young man torn between what he believes is right, and his loyalty to and love of a man who has been like a father to him. In the series, his personality and motives are somewhat inaccurate, as Brutus is portrayed as an unwilling participant in politics. In the earlier episodes he is frequently inebriated and easily ruled by emotion. Brutus' relationship to Cato is not mentioned, and his three sisters and wife Porcia are omitted from the series completely. The Hives' song "B is for Brutus" contains titular and lyrical references to Junius Brutus. Red Hot Chili Peppers song "Even You Brutus?" from their 2011 album I'm with You makes reference to Brutus and Judas Iscariot. The video game Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood features a small side story in the form of the "Scrolls of Romulus" written by Brutus, which reveals that Caesar was a Templar, and Brutus and the conspirators were members of the Roman Brotherhood of Assassins. At the end of the side quest, the player is able to get Brutus' armor and dagger. Later at Assassin's Creed Origins, Brutus and Cassius make an appearance as Aya's earliest recruits and is the one who give the killing blow to Caesar, though his armor from Brotherhood does not make an appearance here. In Tina Fey's teen movie Mean Girls, one of the main characters delivers a monologue about Brutus and how he is just as good as Caesar, saying, "And when did it become okay for one person to be the boss of everybody, huh? Because that's not what Rome is about. We should totally just stab Caesar!"[41] See also[edit] Junia (gens) References[edit] ^ Year given by Cicero (Brutus 324), which agrees with Brutus's cursus honorum. Livy's summary (124) gives XL (40) and a subsequent gap in the text. Velleius Paterculus has Brutus aged 36 at death, but this is probably incorrect. Tempest, pp. 262–263 ^ Suetonius, The Deified Julius, 50 ^ Plutarch, Life of Brutus, 5.2. ^ M. Crawford (1971) Roman Republican Coinage 502.2 shows that Brutus issued coins bearing the inscription Q. CAEPIO BRVTVS PRO [COS] (Q. Caepio Brutus, proconsul) in 42 BC ^ "Coin bearing inscription Q. Caepio Brutus". oldcoin.com.au. Archived from the original on 2011-07-06. Retrieved 2011-01-16. ^ Plutarch, Life of Brutus, 2.1. ^ Plutarch, Life of Brutus, 3.1. ^ Cicero, Att. V 21 ^ Cicero. ad Fam. iii. 4. ^ Plutarch, Life of Brutus, 5.1. ^ Plutarch. "Marcus Brutus". Retrieved January 7, 2017. ^ Plutarch, Marcus Brutus, 13.3. ^ Cicero. Brutus. 77, 94 ^ Cic. Att. 13. 16 ^ Cic. Att. 13. 22 ^ Cassius Dio, Roman History, 44.8.4. ^ Cassius Dio, Roman History, 44.12.2. ^ Cassius Dio, Roman History, 44.12.3. ^ Cassius Dio, 44.13.1. ^ Cassius Dio, 44.13. ^ Plutarch, Marcus Brutus, 14.4 ^ Plutarch. Marcus Brutus. 15.1. ^ Cassius Dio. Roman History. 44.18.1. ^ Plutarch. Marcus Brutus. 15.5. ^ Getlen, Larry (March 1, 2015). "The real story behind the assassination of Julius Caesar". New York Post. Retrieved January 2, 2017. ^ Plutarch. Marcus Brutus. 17.5. ^ Plutarch. Marcus Brutus. 17.6. ^ Plutarch. Marcus Brutus. 17.7. ^ Nicolaus. Life of Augustus. 24. ^ Smith, R. Scott (2014). Ancient Rome: An Anthology of Sources. Hackett Publishing Company. pp. 72, 106. ISBN 978-1624660009. Retrieved 2019-07-11. ^ Plutarch, translated by John Dryden. "Marcus Brutus". Greek Texts. p. 13. Archived from the original on 2011-06-13. Retrieved 2011-01-16. ^ "Marcus Vipsanius Agrippa". Livius.org. 2010-01-02. Retrieved 2011-01-16. ^ "Ancient Greek Online library: Marcus Brutus by Plutarch page 13". Greektexts.com. 2005. Archived from the original on 2011-06-13. Retrieved 2011-01-16. ^ "EID MAR". penelope.uchicago.edu. ^ Plutarch, Life of Brutus, chapter 48 ^ Plutarch, Marcus Brutus, 52.1-53.4. ^ Valerius Maximus, De factis mem. iv.6.5. ^ Cassius Dio, Roman History. 47.49.3. ^ Appian, The Civil Wars, Book 5.136. ^ "John Wilkes Booth Manuscript". Baltimore Sun. 26 April 1992. Retrieved 24 December 2013. ^ "Gretchen Wieners (Character)". IMDb. Retrieved 2017-10-05. Bibliography[edit] Plutarch. Life of Brutus. Further reading[edit] Clarke, M. L. (1981). The Noblest Roman. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Corrigan, Kirsty (2015). Brutus - Caesar's Assassin. Barnsley: Pen & Sword Military. Heitland, W. E. (1909). The Roman Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Parenti, Michael (2003). The Assassination of Julius Caesar. New York: New Press. Plutarch (1910). Arthur H. Clough (ed.). Lives. London: Dutton. Syme, Ronald (1939). The Roman Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Tempest, Kathryn (2017). Brutus: The Noble Conspirator. London: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-18009-1. Wistrand, Erik (1981). The Policy of Brutus the Tyrannicide. Goteborg, Sweden: Kungl. External links[edit] Wikimedia Commons has media related to Marcus Junius Brutus. Wikiquote has quotations related to: Marcus Junius Brutus Marcus Junius Brutus at the Encyclopædia Britannica Information on Marcus Junius Brutus from www.Greektext.com Livius.org: Brutus v t e The works of Plutarch Works Parallel Lives Moralia "De genio Socratis" "On the Malice of Herodotus" Pseudo-Plutarch Lives Alcibiades and Coriolanus1 Alexander the Great and Julius Caesar Aratus of Sicyon / Artaxerxes and Galba / Otho2 Aristides and Cato the Elder1 Crassus and Nicias1 Demetrius and Antony1 Demosthenes and Cicero1 Dion and Brutus1 Fabius and Pericles1 Lucullus and Cimon1 Lysander and Sulla1 Numa and Lycurgus1 Pelopidas and Marcellus1 Philopoemen and Flamininus1 Phocion and Cato the Younger Pompey and Agesilaus1 Poplicola and Solon1 Pyrrhus and Gaius Marius Romulus and Theseus1 Sertorius and Eumenes1 Agis / Cleomenes1 and Tiberius Gracchus / Gaius Gracchus Timoleon and Aemilius Paulus1 Themistocles and Camillus Translators and editors Jacques Amyot Arthur Hugh Clough John Dryden Philemon Holland Thomas North 1 Comparison extant 2 Four unpaired Lives v t e Julius Caesar Major life events Early life and career First Triumvirate Lucca Conference Gallic Wars Caesar's Civil War Crossing the Rubicon Constitutional reforms Dictator perpetuo Assassination Military campaigns Gallic Wars Arar Bibracte Vosges Axona Sabis Atuatuci Octodurus Invasions of Britain Ambiorix's revolt Avaricum Gergovia Alesia Uxellodunum Civil War Corfinium Brundisium Ilerda Dyrrhachium Gomphi Pharsalus Nile Alexandria Zela Ruspina Thapsus Munda Planned invasion of the Parthian Empire Works Laudatio Iuliae amitae Anticato Commentarii de Bello Civili Commentarii de Bello Gallico De analogia Poems by Julius Caesar Portraits Green Caesar Tusculum portrait Arles bust Buildings Forum of Caesar Curia Julia Basilica Julia Temple of Venus Genetrix Caesar's Rhine bridges Quotes Alea iacta est Veni, vidi, vici Ut est rerum omnium magister usus last words Family Wives Cossutia (disputed) Cornelia Pompeia Calpurnia Children Julia Caesarion Augustus (adopted) Other Gaius Julius Caesar (father) Aurelia (mother) Julia Major (sister) Julia Minor (sister) Legacy Cultural depictions of Julius Caesar Temple of Caesar Caesar's Comet Caesarism Julio-Claudian dynasty Related Julia gens Mark Antony Cleopatra Servilia Marcus Junius Brutus Category Authority control BIBSYS: 90282539 BNE: XX1237329 BNF: cb125362018 (data) GND: 118516361 ISNI: 0000 0001 2136 2762 LCCN: n80056883 NKC: jn20000700250 NLA: 35855724 NLG: 284146 NLI: 000025897 NTA: 070089140 RERO: 02-A003051911 SELIBR: 179992 SUDOC: 067069037 Trove: 1117637 VIAF: 63975332 WorldCat Identities: viaf-63975332 Roman politician and assassin of Julius Caesar (85 BC-42 BC) Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marcus_Junius_Brutus&oldid=996569578" Categories: Marcus Junius Brutus 85 BC births 42 BC deaths Ancient Roman generals Ancient Roman jurists Ancient Roman politicians who committed suicide Assassins of heads of government Assassins of Julius Caesar Children of Servilia (mother of Brutus) Junii Bruti Last of the Romans Male suicides Optimates Roman consuls designate Roman Republican praetors Servilii Caepiones Suicides by sharp instrument in Greece Hidden categories: Articles with hCards All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from April 2009 Commons category link is on Wikidata Articles with Encyclopædia Britannica links Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLG identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLI identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with RERO identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with Trove identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikiquote Wikisource Languages Afrikaans العربية Asturianu Azərbaycanca Беларуская Български Brezhoneg Català Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français Galego 한국어 Հայերեն Hrvatski Bahasa Indonesia Íslenska Italiano עברית ქართული Қазақша Кыргызча Latina Lietuvių Magyar Македонски മലയാളം مصرى Bahasa Melayu Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча پنجابی Polski Português Română Русский Scots Simple English Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska ไทย Türkçe Українська اردو Tiếng Việt 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 27 December 2020, at 11:23 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2366 ---- Legacy of the Roman Empire - Wikipedia Legacy of the Roman Empire From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search    Official Romance language   Co-official Romance language   Unofficial Romance language Global distribution of Romance languages: Blue – French; Green – Spanish; Orange – Portuguese; Purple – Catalan; Yellow – Italian; Red – Romanian The legacy of the Roman Empire has been varied and significant, comparable to that of other hegemonic polities of world history (e.g. Persian Empire, ancient Egypt or imperial China). The Roman Empire itself, built upon the legacy of other cultures, has had long-lasting influence with broad geographical reach on a great range of cultural aspects, including state institutions, law, cultural values, religious beliefs, technological advances, engineering and language. This legacy survived the demise of the empire itself (5th century AD in the West, and 15th century AD in the East) and went on to shape other civilisations, a process which continues to this day. The city of Rome was the civitas (reflected in the etymology of the word "civilisation") and connected with the actual western civilisation on which subsequent cultures built. One main legacy is the Latin language of ancient Rome, epitomized by the Classical Latin used in Latin literature, evolved during the Middle Ages and remains in use in the Roman Catholic Church as Ecclesiastical Latin. Vulgar Latin, the common tongue used for regular social interactions, evolved simultaneously into the various Romance languages that exist today (notably Italian, Sardinian, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Catalan, Romanian, etc.). Although the Western Roman Empire fell in the 5th century AD, the Eastern Roman Empire continued until its conquest by the Ottoman Empire in the 15th century AD and cemented the Greek language in many parts of the Eastern Mediterranean even after the Early Muslim conquests of the 7th century AD. Although there has been a small modern revival of the Hellenistic religion with Hellenism, ancient Roman paganism was largely displaced by Roman Catholic Christianity after the 4th century AD and the Christian conversion of Roman emperor Constantine I (r. 306-337 AD). The Christian faith of the late Roman Empire continued to evolve during the Middle Ages and remains a major facet of the religion and the psyche of the modern Western world. Ancient Roman architecture, largely indebted to ancient Greek architecture of the Hellenistic period, has influenced the architecture of the Western world, particularly during the Italian Renaissance of the 15th century. Roman law and republican politics (from the age of the Roman Republic) have left an enduring legacy, influencing the Italian city-state republics of the Medieval period as well as the early United States and other modern democratic republics. The Julian calendar of ancient Rome formed the basis of the standard modern Gregorian calendar, while Roman inventions and engineering, such as the construction of concrete domes, continued to influence various peoples after the fall of Rome. Roman models of colonialism and of warfare also became influential. Contents 1 Language 1.1 Script 1.2 Latin literature 2 Education 3 Calendar and measurement 3.1 Hours of the day 3.2 Numerals and units 3.3 Three-age systems 4 Religion 5 Science and philosophy 6 Roman law and politics 7 Inventions 8 Colonies and roads 9 Architecture 10 Imperial idea 11 Toponymy and ethnonymy 12 See also 13 References 14 Sources 15 External links Language[edit] Main articles: Romance languages and Romance-speaking world Latin became the lingua franca of the early Roman Empire and later of the Western Roman Empire, while - particularly in the Eastern Roman Empire - indigenous languages such as Greek and to a lesser degree Egyptian and Aramaic language continued in use. Despite the decline of the Western Roman Empire, the Latin language continued to flourish in the very different social and economic environment of the Middle Ages, not least because it became the official language of the Roman Catholic Church. Koine Greek, which served as a lingua franca in the Eastern Empire, remains in use today as a sacred language in some Eastern Orthodox churches. In Western and Central Europe and in parts of northern Africa, Latin retained its elevated status as the main vehicle of communication for the learned classes throughout the Middle Ages and subsequently; witness especially the Renaissance and Baroque periods. Books which had a revolutionary impact on science, such as Nicolaus Copernicus' De revolutionibus orbium coelestium (1543), were composed in Latin. This language was not supplanted for scientific purposes until the 18th century, and for formal descriptions in zoology, as well as botany - it survived to the later 20th century.[1] The modern international binomial nomenclature holds to this day: taxonomists assign a Latin or Latinized name as the scientific name of each species. In the 21st century the Romance languages, which comprise all languages that descended from Latin, are spoken by more than 920 million people as their mother tongue, and by 300 million people as a second language, mainly in the Americas, Europe, and Africa.[2] Romance languages are either official, co-official, or significantly used in 72 countries around the world.[3][failed verification][4][need quotation to verify][5][need quotation to verify][6][need quotation to verify][7][need quotation to verify][8][need quotation to verify] Of the United Nations' six official languages, two (French and Spanish) descend from Latin. Additionally, Latin has had a great influence on both the grammar[citation needed] and the lexicon of West Germanic languages. Romance words make respectively 59%, 20% and 14% of English, German and Dutch vocabularies.[9][10][11] Those figures can rise dramatically when only non-compound and non-derived words are included. Accordingly, Romance words make roughly 35% of the vocabulary of Dutch.[11] Of all the loanwords in Dutch, 32.2% come directly from some form of Latin (excluding loans from Romance languages).[12] Script[edit] Main article: Latin alphabet Global distribution of the Latin script. All three official scripts of the modern European Union— Latin, Greek and Cyrillic—descend from writing systems used in the Roman Empire. Today, the Latin script, the Latin alphabet spread by the Roman Empire to most of Europe, and derived from the Phoenician alphabet through an ancient form of the Greek alphabet adopted and modified by Etruscan, is the most widespread and commonly used script in the world. Spread by various colonies, trade routes, and political powers, the script has continued to grow in influence. The Greek alphabet, which had spread throughout the eastern Mediterranean region during the Hellenistic period, remained the primary script of the Eastern Roman Empire through the Byzantine Empire until its demise in the 15th century. Cyrillic scripts largely derive from the Greek.[13] Latin literature[edit] 15th-century printed books by language.[14] The high prestige of Latin meant that that language still dominated European published discourse a millennium after the demise of the Western Roman Empire. The Carolingian Renaissance of the 8th century rescued many works in Latin from oblivion: manuscripts transcribed at that time are our only sources for some works that later fell into obscurity once more, only to be recovered during the Renaissance: Tacitus, Lucretius, Propertius and Catullus furnish examples.[15] Other Latin writers never went out of circulation: Virgil, reinterpreted as a prophet of Christianity by the 4th century, gained the reputation of a sorcerer in the 12th century. Cicero, in a limited number of his works, remained a model of good style, mined for quotations. Medieval Christians read Ovid allegorically, or re-imagined Seneca as the correspondent of Saint Paul. Lucan, Persius, Juvenal, Horace, Terence, and Statius survived in the continuing canon and the historians Valerius Maximus and Livy continued to be read for the moral lessons history was expected to impart. Through the Roman Empire, Greek literature also continued to make an impact in Europe long after the Empire's fall, especially after the recovery of Greek texts from the East during the high Middle Ages and the resurgence of Greek literacy during the Renaissance. Many educated Westerners from the Renaissance up to the 20th century, for instance, read Plutarch's Lives of the Noble Greeks and Romans, originally written in Greek. Shakespeare's play Julius Caesar takes most of its material from Plutarch's biographies of Caesar, Cato, and Brutus, whose exploits were frequently discussed and debated by the literati of Shakespeare's time. Education[edit] Main article: Liberal arts Martianus Capella developed the system of the seven liberal arts that structured medieval education. Although the liberal arts were already known in Ancient Greece, it was only after Martianus that the seven liberal arts took on canonical form. His single encyclopedic work, De nuptiis Philologiae et Mercurii "On the Marriage of Philology and Mercury", laid the standard formula of academic learning from the Christianized Roman Empire of the 5th century until the Renaissance of the 12th century. The seven liberal arts were formed by the trivium, which included the skills of grammar, logic, and rhetoric, while arithmetic, geometry, music, and astronomy played part as the quadrivium. Calendar and measurement[edit] Main articles: Gregorian calendar and Names of the days of the week The modern Western calendar is a refinement of the Julian calendar, which was introduced by Julius Caesar. The calendar of the Roman Empire began with the months Ianuarius (January), Februarius (February), and Martius (March). The common tradition to begin the year on 1 January was a convention established in ancient Rome. Throughout the medieval period, the year began on 25 March, the Catholic Solemnity of the Annunciation. Roman monk of the 5th-century, Dionysius Exiguus, devised the modern dating system of the Anno Domini (AD) era, which is based on the reckoned year of the birth of Jesus, with AD counting years from the start of this epoch, and BC denoting years before the start of the era. The modern seven-day week follows the Greco-Roman system of planetary hours, in which one of the seven heavenly bodies of the Solar System that were known in ancient times—Saturn, Jupiter, Mars, the Sun, Venus, Mercury and the Moon—is given "rulership" over each day. The Romance languages (with the exception of Portuguese, that assigns an ordinal number to five days of the week, from Monday to Friday, beginning with segunda-feira, and ending with sexta-feira) preserve the original Latin names of each day of the week, except for Sunday, which came to be called dies dominicus (Lord's Day) under Christianity. This system for the days of the week spread to Celtic and Germanic peoples, as well as the Albanians, before the collapse of the empire, after which the names of comparable gods were substituted for the Roman deities in some languages. In Germanic languages, for instance, Thor stood in for Jupiter (Jove), yielding "Thursday" from the Latin dies Iovis, while in Albanian, native deities En and Prende were assigned to Thursday and Friday respectively. Day Sunday Sōl (Sun) Monday Luna (Moon) Tuesday Mars (Mars) Wednesday Mercurius (Mercury) Thursday Iuppiter (Jupiter) Friday Venus (Venus) Saturday Saturnus (Saturn) Latin dies Sōlis dies Lūnae dies Martis dies Mercuriī dies Iovis dies Veneris dies Saturnī Italian domenica lunedì martedì mercoledì giovedì venerdì sabato French dimanche lundi mardi mercredi jeudi vendredi samedi Spanish domingo lunes martes miércoles jueves viernes sábado Catalan diumenge dilluns dimarts dimecres dijous divendres dissabte Romanian duminică luni marți miercuri joi vineri sâmbătă Albanian te dielën (diell = "sun") të hënën (hënë = "moon") të martën të mërkurën të enjten të premte të shtunën Irish An Domhnach Dé Domhnaigh An Luan Dé Luain An Mháirt Dé Máirt An Chéadaoin Dé Céadaoin An Déardaoin Déardaoin An Aoine Dé hAoine An Satharn Dé Sathairn Welsh dydd Sul dydd Llun dydd Mawrth dydd Mercher dydd Iau dydd Gwener dydd Sadwrn Breton Disul Dilun Dimeurzh Dimerc’her Diriaou Digwener Disadorn Old English Sunnandæg Mōnandæg Tīwesdæg Wōdnesdæg Þunresdæg Frīgedæg Sæternesdæg German Sonntag Montag Dienstag, Ziestag (Swiss German) Mittwoch (older Wutenstag) Donnerstag Freitag Sonnabend, Samstag Dutch zondag maandag dinsdag woensdag donderdag vrijdag zaterdag Icelandic sunnudagur mánudagur þriðjudagur miðvikudagur fimmtudagur föstudagur laugardagur Norwegian Nynorsk sundag/søndag måndag tysdag onsdag torsdag fredag laurdag Danish søndag mandag tirsdag onsdag torsdag fredag lørdag Swedish söndag måndag tisdag onsdag torsdag fredag lördag Hours of the day[edit] Main articles: 12-hour clock and Roman timekeeping The 12-hour clock is a time convention popularized by the Romans in which the 24 hours of the day are divided into two periods. The Romans divided the day into 12 equal hours, A.M. (ante-meridiem, meaning before midday) and P.M. (post-meridiem, meaning past midday). The Romans also started the practice used worldwide today of a new day beginning at midnight. Numerals and units[edit] Main articles: Roman numerals and Ancient Roman units of measurement A typical clock face with Roman numerals in Bad Salzdetfurth, Germany. The notion of a twelve-hour day dates to the Roman Empire. Roman numerals continued as the primary way of writing numbers in Europe until the 14th century, when they were largely replaced in common usage by Hindu-Arabic numerals. The Roman numeral system continues to be widely used, however, in certain formal and minor contexts, such as on clock faces, coins, in the year of construction on cornerstone inscriptions, and in generational suffixes (such as Louis XIV or William Howard Taft IV). According to the Royal Spanish Academy, in the Spanish language centuries must be written in Roman numerals, so "21st century" should be written as "Siglo XXI". The Romans solidified the modern concept of the hour as one-24th part of a day and night. The English measurement system also retains features of the Ancient Roman foot (11.65 modern inches), which was used in England prior to the Anglo-Saxon settlement of Britain. The inch itself derives from the Roman uncia, meaning one-twelfth part. Three-age systems[edit] Main article: Three-age system Although the present archaeological system of the three main ages—stone, bronze and iron—originates with the Danish archaeologist Christian Jürgensen Thomsen, the concept of dividing pre-historical ages into systems based on metals extends to Ancient Rome, originated by the Roman Lucretius in the first century BC. Religion[edit] Christianity by percentage of population in each country. Main articles: Catholic Church and Eastern Orthodox Church While classical Roman and Hellenistic religion were ultimately superseded by Christianity, many key theological ideas and questions that are characteristic of Western religions originated with pre-Christian theology. The first cause argument for the existence of God, for instance, originates with Plato. Design arguments, which were introduced by Socrates and Aristotle and remain widely discussed to this day, formed an influential component of Stoic theology well into the late Roman period. The problem of evil was widely discussed among ancient philosophers, including the Roman writers such as Cicero and Seneca, and many of the answers they provided were later absorbed into Christian theodicy. In Christian moral theology, moreover, the field of natural law ethics draws heavily on the tradition established by Aristotle, the Stoics, and especially by Cicero's popular Latin work, De Legibus. Cicero's conception of natural law "found its way to later centuries notably through the writings of Saint Isidore of Seville and the Decretum of Gratian"[16] and influenced the discussion of the topic up through the era of the American Revolution. Christianity itself also spread through the Roman Empire; since emperor Theodosius I (AD 379-395), the official state church of the Roman Empire was Christianity. Subsequently, former Roman territories became Christian states which exported their religion to other parts of the world, through colonization and missionaries. Christianity also served as a conduit for preserving and transmitting Greco-Roman literary culture. Classical educational tradition in the liberal arts was preserved after the fall of the empire by the medieval Christian university. Education in the Middle Ages relied heavily on Greco-Roman books such as Euclid's Elements and the influential quadrivium textbooks written in Latin by the Roman statesman Boethius (AD 480–524). Major works of Greek and Latin literature, moreover, were both read and written by Christians during the imperial era. Many of the most influential works of the early Christian tradition were written by Roman and Hellenized theologians who engaged heavily with the literary culture of the empire (see church fathers). St. Augustine's (AD 354-430) City of God, for instance, draws extensively on Virgil, Cicero, Varro, Homer, Plato, and elements of Roman values and identity to criticize paganism and advocate for Christianity amidst a crumbling empire. The engagement of early Christians as both readers and writers of important Roman and Greek literature helped to ensure that the literary culture of Rome would persist after the fall of the empire. For thousands of years to follow, religious scholars in the Latin West from Bede to Thomas Aquinas and later renaissance figures such as Dante, Montaigne and Shakespeare would continue to read, reference and imitate both Christian and pagan literature from the Roman Empire. In the east, the empire's prolific tradition of Greek literature continued uninterrupted after the fall of the west, in part due to the works of the Greek fathers, who were widely read by Christians in medieval Byzantium and continue to influence religious thought to this day (see Byzantine literature). Science and philosophy[edit] Main articles: Roman philosophy and Ancient Greek philosophy Ptolemy's refined geocentric theory of epicycles was backed up by rigorous mathematics and detailed astronomical observations. It was not overturned until the Copernican Revolution, over a thousand years later. The Bible as codex. The codex, the book format today in universal use, was invented by the Romans and spread by Roman Christians.[17] While much of the most influential Greek science and philosophy was developed before the rise of the Empire, major innovations occurred under Roman rule that have had a lasting impact on the intellectual world. The traditions of Greek, Egyptian and Babylonian scholarship continued to flourish at great centers of learning such as Athens, Alexandria, and Pergamon. Epicurean philosophy reached a literary apex in the long poem by Lucretius, who advocated an atomic theory of matter and revered the older teachings of the Greek Democritus. The works of the philosophers Seneca the Younger, Epictetus and the Roman emperor Marcus Aurelius were widely read during the revival of Stoic thought in the Renaissance, which synthesized Stoicism and Christianity. Fighter pilot James Stockdale famously credited the philosophy of Epictetus as being a major source of strength when he was shot down and held as prisoner during the Vietnam War. Plato's philosophy continued to be widely studied under the Empire, growing into the sophisticated neoplatonic system through the influence of Plotinus. Platonic philosophy was largely reconciled with Christianity by the Roman theologian Augustine of Hippo, who, while a staunch opponent of Roman paganism, viewed the Platonists as having more in common with Christians than the other pagan schools.[18] To this day, Plato's Republic is considered the foundational work of Western philosophy, and is read by students around the globe. The widespread Lorem ipsum text, which is widely used as a meaningless placeholder in modern typography and graphic design, is derived from the Latin text of Cicero's philosophical treatise De finibus. Pagan philosophy was gradually supplanted by Christianity in the later years of the Empire, culminating in the closure of the Academy of Athens by Justinian I. Many Greek-speaking philosophers moved to the east, outside the borders of the Empire. Neoplatonism and Aristotelianism gained a stronghold in Persia, where they were a heavy influence on early Islamic philosophy. Thinkers of the Islamic Golden Age such as Ibn Sina (Avicenna) and Ibn Rushd (Averroës) engaged deeply with Greek philosophy, and played a major role in saving works of Aristotle that had been lost to the Latin West. The influence of Greek philosophy on Islam was dramatically reduced In the 11th century when the views of Avicenna and Avveroes were strongly criticized by Al-Ghazali. His Incoherence of the Philosophers is among the most influential books in Islamic history. In Western Europe, meanwhile, the recovery of Greek texts during the Scholastic period had a profound influence on Latin science and theology from the Middle Ages into the Renaissance. In science, the theories of the Greco-Roman physician Galen dominated Western medical thought and practice for more than 1,300 years. Ptolemy produced the most thorough and sophisticated astronomical theory of antiquity, documented in the Almagest. The Ptolemaic model of the solar system would remain the dominant approach to astronomy across Europe and the Middle East for more than a thousand years. Forty eight of the 88 constellations the IAU recognizes today were recorded in the seventh and eighth books of Claudius Ptolemy's Almagest. At Alexandria, the engineer and experimentalist Hero of Alexandria founded the study of mechanics and pneumatics. In modern geometry, Heron's formula bears his name. Roman Alexandria also saw the seeds of modern algebra arise in the works of Diophantus. Greek algebra continued to be studied in the east well after the fall of the Western Empire, where it matured into modern algebra in the hands of al-Khwārizmī (see the history of algebra). The study of Diophantine Equations and Diophantine Approximations are still important areas of mathematical research today. All of the planets in the Solar System, excluding Earth and Uranus, are named after Roman deities. Roman law and politics[edit] Main articles: Corpus Juris Civilis, Civil law (legal system), and Republic Roman Law in blue tones. Republics   Presidential republics with a full presidential system.   Presidential republics with a semi-presidential system.   Parliamentary republics with an executive president chosen by the parliament   Parliamentary republics with a ceremonial president, where the prime minister is the executive.   One-party state considered Republics Although the law of the Roman Empire is not used today, modern law in many jurisdictions is based on principles of law used and developed during the Roman Empire. Some of the same Latin terminology is still used today. The general structure of jurisprudence used today, in many jurisdictions, is the same (trial with a judge, plaintiff, and defendant) as that established during the Roman Empire. The modern concept of republican government is directly modeled on the Roman Republic. The republican institutions of Rome survived in many of the Italian city-states of the Middle Ages and the Renaissance. The United States Congress is inspired by the Roman senate and legislative assemblies, while the president holds a position similar to that of a Roman consul. Many European political thinkers of the Enlightenment were avid consumers of Latin literature. Montesquieu, Edmund Burke, and John Adams were all strongly influenced by Cicero, for instance. Adams recommended Cicero as a model for politicians to imitate, and once remarked that "the sweetness and grandeur of his sounds, and the harmony of his numbers give pleasure enough to reward the reading if one understood none of his meaning."[19] Inventions[edit] Main articles: Roman technology and Eastern Roman technology Gnocchi, a kind of traditional Italian pasta, was introduced to various parts of Europe by the Roman legions during the expansion of the empire. Many Roman inventions were improved versions of other people's inventions and ranged from military organization, weapon improvements, armour, siege technology, naval innovation, architecture, medical instruments, irrigation, civil planning, construction, agriculture and many more areas of civic, governmental, military and engineering development. That said, the Romans also developed a huge array of new technologies and innovations. Many came from common themes but were vastly superior to what had come before, whilst others were totally new inventions developed by and for the needs of Empire and the Roman way of life. Some of the more famous examples are the Roman aqueducts (some of which are still in use today), Roman roads, water powered milling machines, thermal heating systems (as employed in Roman baths, and also used in palaces and wealthy homes) sewage and pipe systems and the invention and widespread use of concrete. Metallurgy and glass work (including the first widespread use of glass windows) and a wealth of architectural innovations including high rise buildings, dome construction, bridgeworks and floor construction (seen in the functionality of the Colosseum's arena and the underlying rooms/areas beneath it) are other examples of Roman innovation and genius. Military inventiveness was widespread and ranged from tactical/strategic innovations, new methodologies in training, discipline and field medicine as well as inventions in all aspects of weaponry, from armor and shielding to siege engines and missile technology. This combination of new methodologies, technical innovation, and creative invention in the military gave Rome the edge against its adversaries for half a millennium, and with it, the ability to create an empire that even today, more than 2000 years later, continues to leave its legacy in many areas of modern life. Colonies and roads[edit] Main article: List of cities founded by the Romans Rome left a legacy of founding many cities as Colonia. There were more than 500 Roman colonies spread through the Empire, most of them populated by veterans of the Roman legions. Some Roman colonies rose to become influential commercial and trade centers, transportation hubs and capitals of international empires, like Constantinople, London, Paris and Vienna. All those colonies were connected by another important legacy of the Roman Empire: the Roman roads. Indeed, the empire comprised more than 400,000 kilometres (250,000 mi) of roads, of which over 80,500 kilometres (50,000 mi) were stone-paved.[20] The courses (and sometimes the surfaces) of many Roman roads survived for millennia and many are overlaid by modern roads, like the Via Emilia in northern Italy. The roads are closely linked to modern-day economies, with those that survived from the empire's territorial peak in 117CE having more economic activity today. This is especially true in European areas, which kept wheeled vehicles in the latter half of the first millennium, whereas other regions preferred cheaper methods of transport such as camel caravans.[21] Architecture[edit] Main article: Ancient Roman architecture The Cathedral of Vilnius (1783), by Laurynas Gucevičius. In the mid-18th century, Roman architecture inspired neoclassical architecture. Neoclassicism was an international movement. Though neoclassical architecture employs the same classical vocabulary as late Baroque architecture, it tends to emphasize its planar qualities, rather than sculptural volumes. Projections and recessions and their effects of light, and shade are flatters; sculptural bas-reliefs are flatter and tend to be enframed in friezes, tablets or panels. Its clearly articulated individual features are isolated rather than interpenetrating, autonomous and complete in themselves. International neoclassical architecture was exemplified in Karl Friedrich Schinkel's buildings, especially the Old Museum in Berlin, Sir John Soane's Bank of England in London and the newly built White House and Capitol in Washington, DC in the United States. The Scots architect Charles Cameron created palatial Italianate interiors for the German-born Catherine II the Great in St. Petersburg. Italy clung to Rococo until the Napoleonic regimes brought the new archaeological classicism, which was embraced as a political statement by young, progressive, urban Italians with republican leanings. Imperial idea[edit] See also: Succession of the Roman Empire and Translatio imperii From a legal point of view the Roman Empire, founded by Augustus in 27 BC and divided into two "parts" (or rather, courts, as the empire continued to be considered as one) after the death of Theodosius I in 395, had survived only in the eastern part which, with the deposition of the last western emperor Romulus Augustulus, in 476, had also obtained the imperial regalia of the western part reuniting from a formal point of view the Roman Empire. The Roman line continued uninterrupted to rule the Eastern Roman Empire, whose main characteristics were Roman concept of state, medieval Greek culture and language, and Orthodox Christian faith. The Byzantines themselves never ceased to refer to themselves as "Romans" (Rhomaioi) and to their state as the "Roman Empire", the "Empire of the Romans" (in Greek Βασιλεία των Ῥωμαίων, Basileía ton Rhōmaíōn) or "Romania" (Ῥωμανία, Rhōmanía). Likewise, they were called "Rûm" (Rome) by their eastern enemies to the point that competing neighbours even acquired its name, such as the Sultanate of Rûm. Flask for Priming Power with the Justice of Trajan (mid-16th century), depicting a woman's plea for justice from Trajan, with an imperial pennant of the Habsburgs suggesting that as Holy Roman Emperors they are the political descendants of the ancient Roman emperors (Walters Art Museum) The designation of the Empire as "Byzantine" is a retrospective idea: it began only in 1557, a century after the fall of Constantinople, when German historian Hieronymus Wolf published his work Corpus Historiæ Byzantinæ, a collection of Byzantine sources. The term did not come in general use in the Western world before the 19th century,[citation needed] when modern Greece was born. The end of the continuous tradition of the Roman Empire is open to debate: the final point may be viewed as coming as early as the sack of Constantinople in 1204, or the capture of Constantinople in 1453, or as late as the abolition of the Ottoman sultanate in 1922 given the Sultans' adoption of the title of Emperor of the Romans (Kayser-i Rum) for themselves. After the fall of Constantinople, Thomas Palaiologos, brother of the last Eastern Roman Emperor, Constantine XI, was elected emperor and tried to organize the remaining forces. His rule came to an end after the fall of the last major Byzantine city, Corinth. He then moved to Italy and continued to be recognized as Eastern emperor by the Christian powers. His son Andreas Palaiologos continued claims on the Byzantine throne until he sold the title to Ferdinand II of Aragon and Isabella I of Castile before his death in 1502.[22] However, there is no evidence that any Spanish monarch used the Byzantine imperial titles. In Western Europe, the Roman concept of state was continued for almost a millennium by the Holy Roman Empire whose emperors, mostly of German tongue, viewed themselves as the legitimate successors to the ancient imperial tradition (King of the Romans) and Rome as the capital of its Empire. The German title of "Kaiser" is derived from the Latin name Caesar, which is pronounced [ˈkae̯sar] in Classical Latin. The coronation of Charlemagne as "Roman" emperor by Pope Leo III in the year 800 happened at a time of unprecedented sole female imperial rule in Constantinople (by Empress Irene) which was interpreted by adversaries as tantamount to a vacancy. The imperial title in the West generated what historians have called the problem of two emperors. The emperors of the Holy Roman Empire sought in many ways to make themselves accepted by the Byzantines as their peers: with diplomatic relations, political marriages or threats. Sometimes, however, they did not obtain the expected results, because from Constantinople they were always called "King of the Germans", never "Emperor." The Holy Roman Empire survived Byzantium, but was eventually dissolved in 1806 owing to pressure by Napoleon I. In Eastern Europe, firstly the Bulgarian, then the Serbian and ultimately the Russian czars (Czar derived from Caesar) proclaimed being Emperors. In Moscow in Russia adopted the idea of being a Third Rome (with Constantinople being the second). Sentiments[citation needed] of being the heir of the fallen Eastern Roman Empire began during the reign of Ivan III, Grand Duke of Moscow who had married Sophia Paleologue, the niece of Constantine XI (it is important to note that she was not the heiress of the Byzantine throne, rather her brother Andreas was). Being the most powerful Orthodox Christian state, the Tsars were thought of in Russia as succeeding the Eastern Roman Empire as the rightful rulers of the Orthodox Christian world.[citation needed] There were also competing Bulgarian and Wallachian[23][24] claims for succession of the Roman Empire. In the early 20th century, the Italian fascists under their "Duce" Benito Mussolini dreamed of transforming Italy back into the Roman Empire again, encompassing the Mediterranean basin. Associated with Italian fascism also Nazi Germany and Francoist Spain connected their claims with Roman imperialism. Toponymy and ethnonymy[edit] See also: List of cities founded by the Romans; List of Latin place names in Continental Europe, Ireland and Scandinavia; List of Latin place names in Britain; List of Latin place names in Africa; and List of Latin place names in Asia Aside from the city of Rome itself, the Imperial Roman name has survived in a number of regions and was also adopted by some of the political regimes that ruled them. These include: Romagna, the Italian region that was the administrative center of Byzantine Italy and thus remained associated with the Roman Empire when most of the country had fallen under Lombard rule; Rûm, the name by which the Seljuq Turks referred to the parts of Anatolia which they had conquered from the Eastern Roman Empire, thus the common name of the Sultanate of Rum for their realm (1077-1308).[25] Under the Ottoman Empire after the 1390s, the Rûm Eyalet was the region around Sivas, later known simply as Eyalet of Sivas. The name of the Turkish city of Erzurum has been derived from the Arabic Arḍ ar-Rūm (Arabic: ارض الروم‎) 'land of the Rûm'.[26][27] Romania, a habitual reference in medieval Latin and Romance languages to the Byzantine Empire, or between 1204 and 1261 to the Latin Empire. It survived for a time in place names such as that of Nafplio, which in Italian was referred to as Napoli in Romania well into the modern era, or to this day in the Bosnian region of Romanija. Rumelia, the Balkanic parts of the former Eastern Empire, labelled "land of the Romans" following their conquest by the Ottomans and at a time when the Asia Minor territories formerly known as Rum were more commonly referred to again as Anatolia. Central Greece is still known colloquially as Roúmeli (Ρούμελη). The modern country of Romania. Tracing the origin of the Romanians to the Roman Empire's province of Dacia has long been part of the national narrative in spite of the scarcity of conclusive evidence. The "Roman" demonym referring to Romance speakers in Wallachia, Moldavia and Transylvania appeared in the 16th century (with various vernacular spellings) under the influence of Renaissance humanism. In linguistics and ethnonymy: The word Romance, naming the language family that also includes Spanish, Portuguese, French and Italian among others, is itself derived from "Roman". See also: Substrate in Romanian Rûm in Asia Minor and the Middle East refers dependent on context to Byzantines and/or Orthodox Christians, namely the Rum Millet in the Ottoman Empire. Correspondingly, Orthodox Armenians are known as Hayhurum - literally, Armenian and Rûm - and Urums are Turkic-speaking Orthodox Christians in the Crimea and Georgia. Romaniote Jews also derive their name from the former Eastern/Byzantine/Ottoman Empire. In turn, during the 16th century, Portuguese used "rume" and "rumes" (plural) as a generic term to refer to the Mamluk-Ottoman forces they faced then in the Indian Ocean.[28] Chinese authors during the Ming dynasty similarly referred to the Ottomans in general as Lumi (魯迷), derived from Rûm. During the Qing dynasty they also used the word Wulumu (務魯木). The Romani people, by contrast, are named after an unrelated Sanskrit root common with the Domba people in India. See also[edit] Western Roman Empire Byzantine Empire Third Rome General: Classical antiquity Classical tradition History of the Roman Empire References[edit] ^ See History of Latin. ^ "Romance languages". Britannica.com. Retrieved 2018-11-24. ^ "Language Acquisition in the Romance Speaking World: Peru - Departamento de Educación". Departamento.pucp.edu.pe. Retrieved 2016-05-14. ^ Fäcke, Christiane (2014-08-25). Manual of Language Acquisition - Google Libros. ISBN 9783110302257. Retrieved 2016-05-14. ^ Weber, Jean Jacques (2009). Multilingualism, Education and Change - Jean Jacques Weber - Google Libros. ISBN 9783631572856. Retrieved 2016-05-14. ^ Johnson, Sally; Ensslin, Astrid (2007-09-19). Language in the Media: Representations, Identities, Ideologies - Google Libros. ISBN 9781441151254. Retrieved 2016-05-14. ^ Beretta, Claudio (2003). I nomi dei fiumi, dei monti, dei siti: strutture linguistiche preistoriche - Claudio Beretta - Google Libros. ISBN 9788820330989. Retrieved 2016-05-14. ^ USA (2015-09-28). "Radiation oncology in Latin speaking countries: A link between Europe and Latin America". Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 19 (4): 227–9. doi:10.1016/j.rpor.2013.06.004. PMC 4104016. PMID 25061515. ^ Finkenstaedt, Thomas; Dieter Wolff (1973). Ordered Profusion; studies in dictionaries and the English lexicon. C. Winter. ISBN 3-533-02253-6. ^ Uwe Pörksen, German Academy for Language and Literature's Jahrbuch [Yearbook] 2007 (Wallstein Verlag, Göttingen 2008, pp. 121-130) ^ a b Loanwords in the World's Languages: A Comparative Handbook (PDF). Walter de Gruyter. 2009. p. 370. ^ van der Sijs, Nicoline (2009). "Loanwords in Dutch". In Haspelmath, Martin; Tadmor, Uri (eds.). Loanwords in the World's Languages: A Comparative Handbook (PDF). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. p. 350. ISBN 978-3-11-021843-5. Retrieved 3 June 2020. The Latin loanwords [in Dutch] (from Roman times, from Church Latin and from medical and scientific Latin) amount to 32.2% of all loanwords [...]. ^ Lunt, Horace G. (1955). "The Old Church Slavonic writing systems". Old Church Slavonic Grammar (7 ed.). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter (published 2010). p. 16. ISBN 9783110876888. Retrieved 3 June 2020. [...] the Greek-based alphabet is the ancestor of the cyrillic alphabets used today in the Balkans and among the East Slavs. ^ "Incunabula Short Title Catalogue". British Library. Retrieved 2 March 2011. ^ Roberto Weiss, The Renaissance Discovery of Classical Antiquity (Oxford: Blackwell) 1969:1. ^ Corwin, Edward S. (1955). The "Higher Law" Background of American Constitutional Law. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. pp. 17–18. ^ Roberts & Skeat 1983, pp. 38−67; 75 ^ Agustine, De Civitate Dei, book viii. ^ Carl J. Richard, Why We're All Romans: The Roman Contribution to the Western World, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2010, p. 122. ^ Gabriel, Richard A. The Great Armies of Antiquity. Westport, Conn: Praeger, 2002. Page 9. ^ Dalgaard, Carl-Johan and Kaarsen, Nicolai and Olsson, Ola and Selaya, Pablo (2018). "Roman Roads to Prosperity: Persistence and Non-Persistence of Public Goods Provision". Center for Economic and Policy Research. SSRN 3130184.CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link) ^ Norwich, John Julius, Byzantium — The Decline and Fall, p. 446. ^ Clark, Victoria (2000). "Chapter 5: Romania". Why Angels Fall. New York: St. Martin's Press: Macmillan. p. 213. ISBN 978-0-312-23396-9. ^ Runciman, Steven (1985). "Chapter 10: The Phanariots". The Great Church in Captivity. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire]; New York: Cambridge University Press. p. 365. ISBN 978-0-521-31310-0. ^ Alexander Kazhdan, "Rūm" The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium (Oxford University Press, 1991), vol. 3, p. 1816. Paul Wittek, Rise of the Ottoman Empire, Royal Asiatic Society Books, Routledge (2013), p. 81: "This state too bore the name of Rûm, if not officially, then at least in everyday usage, and its princes appear in the Eastern chronicles under the name 'Seljuks of Rûm' (Ar.: Salâjika ar-Rûm). A. Christian Van Gorder, Christianity in Persia and the Status of Non-muslims in Iran p. 215: "The Seljuqs called the lands of their sultanate Rum because it had been established on territory long considered 'Roman', i.e. Byzantine, by Muslim armies." ^ See Joseph Laurent's extensive note in his (in French) L’Arménie entre Byzance et l’Islam depuis la conquête arabe jusqu’en 886, 1919, new edition revised and updated by Marius Canard, Lisbon: Librairie Bertrand, 1980, pp. 87–88, note 83. ^ (in Armenian) Darbinyan, M. «Էրզրում» [Erzurum] Armenian Soviet Encyclopedia. Yerevan: Armenian Academy of Sciences, 1978, vol. 4, p. 93. ^ Ozbaran, Salih, "Ottomans as 'Rumes' in Portuguese sources in the sixteenth century", Portuguese Studies, Annual, 2001 Sources[edit] Kuzmanović, Zorica; Mihajlović, Vladimir D. (2015). "Roman Emperors and Identity Constructions in Modern Serbia". Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power. 22 (4): 416–432. Roberts, Colin H.; Skeat (1983), The Birth of the Codex, London: Oxford University Press, ISBN 0-19-726024-1 External links[edit] Byzantine & Christian Museum / From the ancient world to Byzantium v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films v t e Western world and culture Aspects Canon Esotericism Law Literature Media Music Painting Modern/Contemporary Painting Philosophy Religion History Classical antiquity Late Antiquity Middle Ages (Early Middle Ages High Middle Ages Late Middle Ages) Christendom Renaissance Reformation Age of Enlightenment Early modern period Great Divergence Modernism Westernization World Wars Cold War War on Terror Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Legacy_of_the_Roman_Empire&oldid=993773529" Categories: History of the Roman Empire Legacies Hidden categories: CS1 maint: uses authors parameter Articles with French-language sources (fr) Articles with Armenian-language sources (hy) All articles with failed verification Articles with failed verification from June 2020 Wikipedia articles needing factual verification from June 2020 All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from June 2020 Articles containing Portuguese-language text Articles containing Latin-language text Articles containing Italian-language text Articles containing French-language text Articles containing Spanish-language text Articles containing Catalan-language text Articles containing Romanian-language text Articles containing Albanian-language text Articles containing Irish-language text Articles containing Welsh-language text Articles containing Breton-language text Articles containing Old English (ca. 450-1100)-language text Articles containing German-language text Articles containing Dutch-language text Articles containing Icelandic-language text Articles containing Nynorsk-language text Articles containing Danish-language text Articles containing Swedish-language text Articles with unsourced statements from April 2009 Articles with unsourced statements from June 2018 Articles containing Arabic-language text Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages العربية Português Edit links This page was last edited on 12 December 2020, at 12:25 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2367 ---- Eutropius (historian) - Wikipedia Eutropius (historian) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Roman historian For other uses, see Eutropius. Eutropius (fl. AD 363–387) was a Roman historian. Contents 1 Life 2 Work 3 Legacy 4 References 4.1 Citations 4.2 Bibliography 5 External links Life[edit] The exact background and birthplace of Eutropius is disputed. Some scholars claim he was born in Burdigala (Bordeaux) and was a man of medicine.[1] Others, however, most notably H.W. Bird, have dismissed these claims as being highly unlikely. Eutropius has been referred to as 'Italian' in other sources and supposedly held estates in Asia. Aside from that, his name was Greek, making it unlikely he came from Gaul. Confusion about this has arisen due to the fact that Eutropius was a popular name in late antiquity.[2] He was, however, almost certainly a pagan and remained one under the emperor Julian's Christian successors.[1] He served as the imperial secretary (Latin: magister memoriae) in Constantinople.[3] He accompanied Julian the Apostate (r. 361–363) on his expedition against the Parthians in 363.[1][4] He survived at least as long as the reign of the emperor Valens (364–378), to whom he dedicated his Summary of Roman History.[3] Eutropius may have been the same Eutropius that was proconsul, or Governor of Asia from 371 to 372.[4] He may have also been the Praetorian Prefect of the Illyrian Provinces from 380 to 381.[4] As well possibly being a consul in 387.[4] Work[edit] His Summary of Roman History (Latin: Breviarium Historiae Romanae) is a ten-chapter compendium of Roman history from its foundation to the short reign of Jovian.[4] It was compiled with considerable care from the best accessible authorities; it was written in a clear and simple style; and it treats its subjects with general impartiality.[3][1] The message of the book was simple, that Romans always overcome their problems. This theme became especially important after the Battle of Adrianople.[4] Eutropius stressed the importance of the Senate in his work.[4] This is probably secretly advice to Valens.[4] For the Republican period, Eutropius depended upon an epitome of Livy. For the Empire, he appears to have used Suetonius and the now lost Enmannsche Kaisergeschichte. At the end, he probably made use of his own personal experiences.[5] The fact that the work ends with the reign of Jovian implies that it was written during the reign of either Valentinian I or Valens.[4] If that was true, than the work would been written between 364-378.[4] Legacy[edit] The independent value of his Summary is small, but it sometimes fills a gap left by the more authoritative records. It is particularly useful to historians for its account of the First Punic War, as no copy of Livy's original books for that period have survived. Its stylistic and methodological virtues caused it to be much used by later Roman chroniclers.[1] In particular, it received expanded editions by Paul the Deacon and Landolf Sagax[6] that repeated the original text and then continued it into the reigns of Justinian the Great and Leo the Armenian respectively.[3] It was translated into Greek by Paeanius around 380[1] and by Capito Lycius in the 6th century. The latter translation has survived almost in its entirety. Although Eutropius's style contains some idiosyncrasies, the work's plain style made it long a favorite elementary Latin schoolbook.[3] A scholarly edition was compiled by H. Droysen in 1879, containing Capito Lycius's Greek edition and the expanded Latin editions of Paul and Landolf.[3] There have been numerous English editions and translations, including Bird's.[7] References[edit] Citations[edit] ^ a b c d e f Lieu (1998), p. 77. ^ Eutropius, active 4th century. (1993). The breviarium ab urbe condita of Eutropius : the right honourable secretary of state for general petitions : dedicated to Lord Valens, Gothicus Maximus & perpetual emperor. Bird, H. W. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press. ISBN 0-85323-208-3. OCLC 28250017. ^ a b c d e f Chisholm 1911. ^ a b c d e f g h i j "Eutropius - Livius". www.livius.org. Retrieved 2020-09-06. ^ Bird (1993), pp. xliv & seq. sfnp error: no target: CITEREFBird1993 (help) ^ Landolfus Sagax, Historia Miscella, about AD 1000. ^ Bird (1993). sfnp error: no target: CITEREFBird1993 (help) Bibliography[edit]  This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Eutropius". Encyclopædia Britannica. 9 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 958. Bird, Harold W., ed. (1993), Breviarium, Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, ISBN 978-0853232087 . Den Boer, Willem (1972), Some Minor Roman Historians, Leiden: Brill, pp. 114 & seq., ISBN 90-04-03545-1 Lieu, Samuel N. C. (1998), "Eutropius", Encyclopaedia Iranica, Vol. IX, Fasc. 1, p. 77 . External links[edit] Wikimedia Commons has media related to Eutropius. Wikisource has original works written by or about: Eutropius Online version of a 1559/61 Basel edition of the Breviarium with detailed comments by Glareanus and other humanists (Latin) Eutropius, Abridgement of Roman History, John Selby Watson (translator), (1853) (from Forum Romanum; both Latin text and English translation) Eutropius, Abridgement of Roman History, John Selby Watson (translator), (1886) (from The Tertullian Project; only English translation) Eutropius, Abridgement of Roman History, Lamberto Bozzi (translator), (2019) (from CRT Pesaro; both Latin text and English translation) Eutropius, Eutropii Breviarium (from The Latin Library; only Latin text) Eutropius, Eutropi Breviarium ab urbe condita cum versionibus graecis et Pauli Landolfique additamentis, Ed. Droysen, Hans. (from Monumenta Germaniae Historica Digital); Image files include the preface, Greek and Latin text, critical apparatus, appendices and indices The Chinese translation of Eutropi Breviarium Political offices Preceded by Honorius Flavius Euodius Consul of the Roman Empire 387 with Valentinian II Succeeded by Magnus Maximus, Theodosius I, Maternus Cynegius Authority control BIBSYS: 95001684 BNE: XX904451 BNF: cb11995592s (data) CANTIC: a11466108 CiNii: DA0142807X GND: 118682768 ISNI: 0000 0001 2124 8871 LCCN: n85083031 NKC: jn20000400642 NSK: 000118099 NTA: 06982374X RERO: 02-A000059513 SELIBR: 185725 SUDOC: 029815584 Trove: 958007 VcBA: 495/14750 VIAF: 25396473 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n85083031 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Eutropius_(historian)&oldid=993130646" Categories: 4th-century historians 4th-century Latin writers 4th-century Romans Imperial Roman consuls Latin historians People from Bordeaux Hidden categories: Harv and Sfn no-target errors Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata Articles containing Latin-language text Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica with Wikisource reference Wikipedia articles incorporating text from the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica CS1: long volume value Commons category link from Wikidata Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CANTIC identifiers Wikipedia articles with CINII identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NSK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with RERO identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with Trove identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikisource Languages العربية Български Català Čeština Cymraeg Deutsch Ελληνικά Español Euskara Français Galego Bahasa Indonesia Italiano עברית Latina Magyar Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Polski Português Română Русский Simple English Slovenčina Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Taqbaylit Türkçe Українська Tiếng Việt 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 8 December 2020, at 23:29 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2387 ---- National Library of Poland - Wikipedia National Library of Poland From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia   (Redirected from NLP (identifier)) Jump to navigation Jump to search Central Polish library National Library Biblioteka Narodowa Type National library Established August 8, 1747 (273 years ago) (1747-08-08) as Załuski Library February 24, 1928 (92 years ago) (1928-02-24) as National Library Location Warsaw, Poland Coordinates 52°12′52″N 21°00′16″E / 52.21444°N 21.00444°E / 52.21444; 21.00444Coordinates: 52°12′52″N 21°00′16″E / 52.21444°N 21.00444°E / 52.21444; 21.00444 Collection Size 9,634,026 (As of 2013)[1] Legal deposit Yes Other information Director Dr. Tomasz Makowski Website www.bn.org.pl Map The National Library (Polish: Biblioteka Narodowa) is the central Polish library, subject directly to the Ministry of Culture and National Heritage of the Republic of Poland. The library collects books, journals, electronic and audiovisual publications published in the territory of Poland, as well as Polonica published abroad. It is the most important humanities research library, the main archive of Polish writing and the state centre of bibliographic information about books. It also plays a significant role as a research facility and is an important methodological center for other Polish libraries. The National Library receives a copy of every book published in Poland as legal deposit. The Jagiellonian Library is the only other library in Poland to have a national library status. Contents 1 Organizational structure 2 History 3 Collections 4 See also 5 Notes 6 References 7 External links Organizational structure[edit] There are three general sections: The Library The Bibliographic Institute of the National Library The Book and Readership Institute History[edit] Special Collections Building: Krasiński Palace (Palace of the Commonwealth), Warsaw The National Library's history has origins in the 18th century (Załuski Library)[2] including items from the collections of John III Sobieski which were obtained from his grand daughter Maria Karolina Sobieska, Duchess of Bouillon. However, the Załuski collection was confiscated by troops of Russian tsarina Catherine II in the aftermath of the second Partition of Poland and sent to Saint Petersburg, where the books formed the mass of the Imperial Public Library on its formation in 1795.[3][4][5] Parts of the collection were damaged or destroyed as they were mishandled while being removed from the library and transported to Russia, and many were stolen.[3][4] According to the historian Joachim Lelewel, the Zaluskis' books, "could be bought at Grodno by the basket".[4] Because of that, when Poland regained her independence in 1918, there was no central institution to serve in the capacity of a national library. On 24 February 1928, by the decree of president Ignacy Mościcki, the National Library was created in its modern form.[6] It was opened in 1930 and initially had 200 thousand volumes. Its first Director General was Stefan Demby, succeeded in 1934 by Stefan Vrtel-Wierczyński. The collections of the library were rapidly extended. For instance, in 1932 president Mościcki donated all of the books and manuscripts from the Wilanów Palace Museum to the library, some 40 thousand volumes and 20 thousand pictures from the collection of Stanisław Kostka Potocki. Initially the National Library lacked a seat of its own. Because of that, the collections had to be accommodated in several places. The main reading room was located in the newly built library building of the Warsaw School of Economics. In 1935 the Potocki Palace in Warsaw became home for the special collections. A new, purpose-built building for the library was planned in what is now the Pole Mokotowskie, in a planned monumental "Government District". However, its construction was hampered by the outbreak of World War II. Before World War II, the library collections consisted of: 6.5 million books and journals from 19th and 20th centuries 3,000 early prints 2,200 incunables 52,000 manuscripts maps, icons and music In 1940 the Nazi occupants changed the National Library into Municipal Library of Warsaw and divided it as follows: Department of Books for Germans (located in the Warsaw University building) Restricted Department, containing books that were not available to readers (located in the then main seat of the library—the School of Economics) All special collections from various Warsaw offices and institutions (located in the Palace of the Republic) In 1944 the special collections were set ablaze by the Nazi occupants as a part of repressions after the Warsaw Uprising.[7] This caused the destruction of 80,000 early printed books, including priceless 16th–18th century Polonica, 26,000 manuscripts, 2,500 incunables, 100,000 drawings and engravings, 50,000 pieces of sheet music and theatre materials.[8] It is estimated that out of over six million volumes in Warsaw's major libraries in 1939, 3.6 million volumes were lost during World War II, a large part of them belonging to the National Library.[9][10] Collections[edit] The main reading room Today the collections of the National Library are one of the largest in the country. Among 7,900,000 volumes (2004) held in the library are 160,000 objects printed before 1801, over 26,000 manuscripts (including 6,887 music manuscripts), over 114,000 music prints and 400,000 drawings. The library collections also include photographs and other iconographic documents, more than 101,000 atlases and maps, over 2,000,000 ephemera, as well as over 2,000,000 books and about 800,000 copies of journals from the 19th to 21st centuries. Notable items in the collection include 151 leaves of the Codex Suprasliensis, which was inscribed in UNESCO's Memory of the World Programme Register in 2007 in recognition for its supranational and supraregional significance.[11] In 2012 the library signed an agreement to add 1.3 million Polish library records to WorldCat.[12] See also[edit] Digital Library of the National Library of Poland List of libraries damaged during the World War II Notes[edit] ^ Zbiory—www.bn.org.pl ^ Pasztaleniec-Jarzyńska 2000, p. 5 harvnb error: no target: CITEREFPasztaleniec-Jarzyńska2000 (help) ^ a b Czechowicz, ¶ "After the fall..." ^ a b c Witt, ¶ "The Dispersal of the collection" ^ Basbanes, p. 185 ^ Pasztaleniec-Jarzyńska 2000, p. 3 harvnb error: no target: CITEREFPasztaleniec-Jarzyńska2000 (help) ^ Knuth, p. 166 ^ Pasztaleniec-Jarzyńska 2000, p. 9 harvnb error: no target: CITEREFPasztaleniec-Jarzyńska2000 (help) ^ Mężyński, p. 296 ^ Balcerzak, p. 4 ^ UNESCO, ¶ "The codex was written..." ^ "National Library of Poland will add 1.3 million more records to WorldCat". Research Information. November 8, 2012. References[edit] Nicholas A. Basbanes (2003). A Splendor of Letters: The Permanence of Books in an Impermanent World. Warsaw: HarperCollins. p. 155. ISBN 0-06-008287-9. Retrieved 2008-02-17. Zaluski library Russia. various authors; Tomasz Balcerzak; Lech Kaczyński (2004). Tomasz Balcerzak (ed.). Pro memoria: Warszawskie biblioteki naukowe w latach okupacji 1939-1945. transl. Philip Earl Steele. Warsaw: Biblioteka Narodowa. p. 38. Katarzyna Czechowicz (August 14, 2007). "The 260th anniversary of opening the Załuski Library". eduskrypt.pl. Archived from the original on August 14, 2017. Retrieved 2008-02-17. Rebecca Knuth (2006). Burning books and leveling libraries: extremist violence and cultural destruction. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 166. ISBN 0-275-99007-9. Andrzej Mężyński (2010). Biblioteki Warszawy w latach 1939–1945 [Warsaw's Libraries in the years 1939-1945]. Straty Kultury Polskiej (in Polish). Warsaw: Ministry of Culture and National Heritage. p. 367. ISBN 9788392922766. Joanna Pasztaleniec-Jarzyńska; Halina Tchórzewska-Kabata (2000), The National Library in Warsaw: tradition and the present day (in Polish), Warsaw: National Library, ISBN 83-7009-295-0 UNESCO (corporate author) (2007). "Codex Suprasliensis". portal.unesco.org. UNESCO. Archived from the original on 2013-10-20. Retrieved 2013-07-18. Maria Witt (September 15, 2005). "The Zaluski Collection in Warsaw". The Strange Life of One of the Greatest European Libraries of the Eighteenth Century. FYI France. ISSN 1071-5916. Retrieved 2008-02-17. External links[edit] Wikimedia Commons has media related to National Library in Warsaw. National Library website Polona—National Digital Library A Commonwealth of Diverse Cultures (an exhibition carried out by the National Library) v t e National libraries of Europe Sovereign states Albania Andorra Armenia Austria Azerbaijan Belarus Belgium Bosnia and Herzegovina Bulgaria Croatia Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Georgia Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Italy Kazakhstan Latvia Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Malta Moldova Monaco Montenegro Netherlands North Macedonia Norway Poland Portugal Romania Russia San Marino Serbia Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey Ukraine United Kingdom Vatican City States with limited recognition Abkhazia Artsakh Kosovo Northern Cyprus South Ossetia Transnistria Dependencies and other entities Åland Faroe Islands Gibraltar Guernsey Isle of Man Jersey Svalbard Other entities European Union v t e Authority control files AAG • ACM DL • ADB • AGSA • autores.uy • AWR • BALaT • BIBSYS • Bildindex • BNC • BNE • BNF • Botanist • BPN • CANTIC • CiNii • CWGC • DAAO • DBLP • DSI • FNZA • GND • HDS • IAAF • ICCU • ICIA • ISNI • Joconde • KulturNav • LCCN • LIR • LNB • Léonore • MBA • MGP • NARA • NBL • NDL • NGV • NKC • NLA • NLG • NLI • NLK • NLP • NLR • NSK • NTA • ORCID • PIC • ResearcherID • RERO • RKD • RKDimages ID • RSL • SELIBR • SIKART • SNAC • SUDOC • S2AuthorId • TA98 • TDVİA • TE • TePapa • TH • TLS • Trove • UKPARL • ULAN • US Congress • VcBA • VIAF • WorldCat Identities Authority control BIBSYS: 90860808 BNE: XX121233 BNF: cb11882741b (data) GND: 1002214-4 ISNI: 0000 0001 0942 8415 LCCN: n80014571 LNB: 000050545 NKC: kn20010709017 NLA: 36059319 NLG: 100012 NLP: A10237288 NSK: 000033546 SUDOC: 026613603 ULAN: 500312754 VIAF: 132112363 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n80014571 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Library_of_Poland&oldid=995069221" Categories: 1928 establishments in Poland Buildings and structures in Warsaw Deposit libraries Libraries established in 1928 Libraries in Warsaw Library buildings completed in 1930 National libraries Rebuilt buildings and structures in Poland Research libraries Hidden categories: Harv and Sfn no-target errors Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata Coordinates on Wikidata Infobox mapframe without OSM relation ID on Wikidata Articles containing Polish-language text CS1 Polish-language sources (pl) Commons link is on Wikidata Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with LNB identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLG identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLP identifiers Wikipedia articles with NSK identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with ULAN identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Pages using the Kartographer extension Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Languages العربية Беларуская Български Català Čeština Deutsch Español Esperanto فارسی Français 한국어 Հայերեն Hrvatski Italiano עברית ქართული Kaszëbsczi Lingua Franca Nova Magyar Македонски مصرى Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Polski Português Română Русский Shqip Simple English Српски / srpski Suomi Türkçe Удмурт Українська Tiếng Việt 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 19 December 2020, at 01:41 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2371 ---- Roman infantry tactics - Wikipedia Roman infantry tactics From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Part of a series on the Military of ancient Rome 753 BC – AD 476 Structural history Army Unit types and ranks Decorations and punishments Legions Auxilia Generals Navy Fleets Admirals Campaign history Wars and battles Technological history Military engineering Castra Siege engines Triumphal arches Roads Political history   Strategy and tactics Infantry tactics Frontiers and fortifications Limes Limes Britannicus Antonine Wall Hadrian's Wall Saxon Shore Limes Germanicus Alb Limes Lauter Valley Limes Lower Germanic Limes Main Limes Neckar-Odenwald Limes Upper Germanic-Rhaetian Limes Wetterau Limes Danube–Iller–Rhine Limes Norican Limes Claustra Alpium Iuliarum Pannonian Limes Limes Alutanus Limes Moesiae Trajan's Wall Anastasian Wall Limes Sarmatiae Limes Arabicus Limes Tripolitanus Limes Mauretaniae  Ancient Rome portal •  War portal v t e Roman infantry tactics refers to the theoretical and historical deployment, formation, and manoeuvres of the Roman infantry from the start of the Roman Republic to the fall of the Western Roman Empire. The focus below is primarily on Roman tactics – the "how" of their approach to battle, and how it stacked up against a variety of opponents over time. It does not attempt detailed coverage of things like army structure or equipment. Various battles are summarized to illustrate Roman methods with links to detailed articles on individual encounters. The original Roman army was made up of hoplites. Their main strategy was forming into a Phalanx. Eventually the Roman army would switch to the Maniple system. The maniple system would divide the Roman army into three units called Hastati, Principes, and Triarii. Later Roman statesmen Marius would institute the Marian reforms, creating the Roman legion of popular imagination. Eventually, Roman emperor Diocletian would create the Comitatenses and Limatanei units in order to better defend the Roman empire. Roman legionaries had armor, a gladius, a shield, two pila, and food rations. They also carried around tools such as dolabra, wooden stave, shallow wicker, and a basket. These tools would be used for building the castrum. Sometimes Roman soldiers would have mules that carried equipment. Legions also carried onagers, ballistas, and scorpios. Roman soldiers would train for four months.They learned marching skills first, followed by learning how to use their weapons. Then they began to spar with other soldiers. During the training exercise Roman legionaries would also be taught to obey their commanders and either the Republic or the Emperor. Roman Legions were divided into units called Cohorts. Each Cohort was divided into three maniples. Each maniple was divided into centuries. Several legions made up field armies. During the Republic Consuls, Proconsuls, Praetors, Propraetors, or Dictators were the only officials that could command an army. A Legatus assisted the magistrate in commanding the legion. Tribunes oversaw the logistics of the army. Centurions commanded the Centuries. The Roman army would be supplied by purchasing agents that would by provisions. Local peasants or farmers might have their supplies taken from them in order to supply the Roman legion. Roman soldiers would build infrastructure such as roads or supply caches well on march. Some equipment was moved by pack animals and carts. Traders, hucksters, prostitutes, and other miscellaneous service providers. While marching the Legion would deploy in several columns with a vanguard behind them. This formation would be surrounded by soldiers on the flanks. Afterwards the soldiers would construct a fortified camp. After staying in the camp for some time, the army would destroy the camp to prevent its use by the enemy, and then continue moving. The commanders of the Roman army might try to gather intelligence on the enemy. The commander would try to boost the morale of his soldiers during the march. Before a battle the commander would try to maneuver his army in a way that granted him the advantage. If the battle was fought when the maniple system was in place, the army would have the hastati in the front, the Principes in the middle, and the Triarii in the back. Skirmishers called Velites would be placed in front of the army in order to throw javelins at the enemy. Once the Marian reforms were enacted, the same formations and strategies continued to be used. However instead of Hastati, Principes, and Triarii they used Cohorts. When conducting a siege the army would begin by building a military camp. Then they would use siege weapons and the soldiers to assault the city an take it. When defending a city they built palisades, assault roads,moles, breakwaters and double walls. The legions also would build a camp. Contents 1 Evolution 1.1 Roman Infantry of the Roman Kingdom and Republic 1.2 Roman infantry of the Late Republic and Early Empire 1.3 Roman Infantry of the Late Empire 2 Manpower 3 Equipment and training 3.1 Equipment 3.1.1 Individual weapons, personal equipment and haulage 3.1.2 Artillery package 3.2 Training 4 Organization, leadership and logistics 4.1 Command, control and structure 4.1.1 Military structure and ranks 4.1.1.1 Force structure 4.1.1.2 Rank summary 4.2 Logistics 5 Battle 5.1 Initial preparations and movement for battle 5.2 Deployment for combat 5.2.1 Layout of the triple line 5.2.2 Maneuvering 5.2.3 Formations 5.3 Combat 5.4 3-line system advantages 5.4.1 Flexibility 5.4.2 Mixing of a continuous front with interval fighting 5.4.3 Line spacing and combat stamina 5.5 Post-deployment commands 6 Siegecraft and fortifications 6.1 Besieging cities 6.2 Field fortifications 7 Infantry effectiveness 7.1 Roman infantry versus the Macedonian phalanx 7.1.1 Versus Pyrrhus 7.1.2 Notable triumphs 7.1.2.1 Battle of Cynoscephalae 7.1.2.2 Battle of Pydna 7.1.3 Other anti-phalanx tactics 7.1.4 Versus Hannibal's Carthage 7.2 Roman infantry versus Gallic and the Germanic tribes 7.2.1 Barbarian armies 7.2.2 Early Gallic victories 7.2.3 Tactical performance versus Gallic and Germanic opponents 7.2.3.1 Gallic and Germanic strengths 7.2.3.2 Gallic and Germanic weaknesses 7.2.3.3 Gallic and Germanic chariots 7.2.3.4 Superior tactical organization: victory of Caesar at the Sambre River 7.2.3.5 Persisting logistics strategy: Gallic victory at Gergovia 7.2.4 Roman infantry versus mobile and guerilla warfare in Hispania 7.3 Victory through attrition 7.3.1 Resource tactics 7.4 Roman infantry versus cavalry 7.4.1 Tactical problems of fighting cavalry 7.4.2 Successful tactics 7.5 Decline 7.5.1 "Barbarization" of the heavy infantry 7.5.2 Changes in the legions 7.5.3 The mobile forces approach 7.6 Twilight of the hard-core infantry 7.7 Assessment of the Roman infantry 7.7.1 Central factors in Roman success 8 See also 9 References 9.1 Citations 10 Sources 11 External links Evolution[edit] Roman military tactics evolved from the type of a small tribal host-seeking local hegemony to massive operations encompassing a world empire.This advance was affected by changing trends in Roman political, social and economic life, and that of the larger Mediterranean world, but it was also undergirded by a distinctive "Roman way" of war. This approach included a tendency towards standardization and systematization, practical borrowing, copying and adapting from outsiders, flexibility in tactics and methods, a strong sense of discipline, a ruthless persistence that sought comprehensive victory, and a cohesion brought about by the idea of Roman citizenship under arms – embodied in the legion.[1] These elements waxed and waned over time, but they form a distinct basis underlying Rome's rise. Some key phases of this evolution throughout Rome's military history include:[2] Military forces based primarily on heavy citizen infantry with tribal beginnings and early use of phalanx-type elements (see Military establishment of the Roman kingdom) Growing sophistication as Roman hegemony expanded outside Italy into North Africa, Greece and the Middle East (see Military establishment of the Roman Republic) Continued refinement, standardization and streamlining in the period associated with Gaius Marius including broader-based incorporation of more citizenry into the army, and more professionalism and permanence in army service Continued expansion, flexibility and sophistication from the end of the republic into the time of the Caesars (see Military establishment of the Roman Empire) Growing barbarization, turmoil and weakening of the heavy infantry units in favour of cavalry and lighter troops (see Foederati) Demise of the Western Empire and fragmentation into smaller, weaker local forces. This included the reversal of status of cavalry and infantry in the Eastern Empire. Cataphract forces formed an elite, with infantry being reduced to auxiliaries. Roman Infantry of the Roman Kingdom and Republic[edit] A phalanx A depiction of the Maniple Formation The earliest soldiers of the Roman army were hoplites. Census data from the Roman Kingdom shows that the soldiers were Hoplites in a Phalanx. Cavalrymen went into battle with their torso's bare.[3]The legion of the Early Roman Republic was divided into 30 120-160 men strong maniples organized into 3 lines of 10 maniples. In front of the main infantrymen were skirmishers called Velites. The Velites would fight in a swarm of uncoordinated soldiers. They would have no commander. The Velites purpose on the battlefield was using javelins to disrupt the enemy formation. The first line was made up of Hastati, the second Princeps, and the third Triarii. Each maniple was commanded by two Centurions and the whole legion was commanded by six tribunes. Each maniple had a trumpeteer. The trumpeteer would use music to convey orders between maniples.[4]The soldiers in the manipular legions would be heavily spaced apart, allowing greater flexibility on the battlefield. The maniple units would be spaced 20 yards apart, and 100 yards from the next line of manipular soldiers. Aside from improving the flexibility of the legion, the space between each unit meant that if a line was routed, they could retreat through the gaps. The next line could then attack the enemy. This maneuver could be repeated indefinitely, the enemy would always be facing fresh units of Romans. The maniples in the army could act totally independently, allowing commanders to use the element of surprise to its maximum.[5][6]Livy states that soldiers would "open" the maniple in order to let the soldiers fight well. It is unknown how the soldiers opened the maniple but it was probably by ordering one soldier in every second line to take a step forward. This maneuver would result in soldiers having a checkerboard formation. Cassius Dio and other historians believe that the maniples would expand laterally, this movement would fill in the gaps in the formation and expand the space between each soldier. Such a maneuver may be feasible during a lull in the fighting during a battle, however during the heat of battle the maneuver would be difficult to manage and time-consuming. A coin depicting two soldiers fighting Polybius described the swordsmanship of the Roman army as: In their manner of fighting, however, each man undertakes movement on his own, protecting his body with his long shield, parrying a blow, and fighting hand to hand with the cut and thrust of his sword. They therefore clearly require a space and flexibility between each other, so that each soldier must have three feet from the men to their flank and rear, if they are to be effective. It is unclear whether Polybius meant the "three feet" counts the space occupied by the Roman soldier and his equipment. If Polybius meant this, then each Roman soldier would have nine feet between them and the other soldiers. It is also possible Polybius included the area the soldier occupied, which meant the soldier had six feet of space between them and the other soldiers. Vegetius talked about Roman soldiers having three feet between them. Depictions of Roman soldiers in art suggest that the gap between soldiers is 65-75 centimeters. Modern scholars such as Michael J Taylor state that the gaps between the maniples were 10-20 meters.[6] Roman infantry of the Late Republic and Early Empire[edit] Roman Legionaries The legions would form into a close-defensive formation to resist a barrage of arrow fire or an enemy charge. This formation was called the testudo, the Romans would continue to use the testudo throughout the entire history of their civilization. When in battle, the legions would be separated into their cohorts. Four of the cohorts would line up on the battle line and lead. The other six would follow behind the first four as reserves should many men fall in battle. If cavalry is involved, they would be placed on the sides of the main cohorts. Like the Early Republican armies, the legions would still be organized into the same checkerboard formation. The soldiers would march forward until they met the enemy, and proceed to attack. The initial formation of soldiers is dictated by the enemy's formation, the terrain of the battlefield[5], and the troops of which the legion is made up. To soften up the enemy before the main infantry, the soldiers would throw pilum, or shoot arrows. On occasion, a legion would have ballista, or a piece of field artillery that threw large arrows. To instill fear into their enemy, the soldiers of a legion would march onto an enemy completely silent until they were close enough to attack. At that point, the entire army would utter a battle cry to frighten their enemy. When their tactics did not initially work, commanders would often mold their strategy to what was necessary.[7] Roman Infantry of the Late Empire[edit] The army of the Late Roman Empire would consist of the Limitanei and Comitatenses armies. The Germanic tribes would contribute paramilitary units called Foederati to the Roman army. The Limitanei would defend the borders of the Empire from small attacks by the Germanic peoples. The Limitanei would also hold against a larger invasion long enough for the Comitatenses legions to arrive. The Limitanei would be stationed in their own forts throughout the empire. Usually these forts would be in or near cities and villages. This meant that the soldiers were in constant interaction with civilians. Often times the soldiers families would live in the cities or villages near the fort. Occasionally villages and town would grow around these forts in order to suit the needs of the Limitanei.[8] This strategy has been described as "defense in depth."The Comitatenses were grouped into field armies. The Emperor would have his own personal Comitatenses army to help fight rebellions. Roman generals of the late empire would try to avoid pitched battles in order to conserve manpower. During a battle the Comitatenses legions would wait in a defensive formation while performing a shield wall. The Romans would then try to use their superior superior coordination to repulse the enemy attack and inflict heavy casualties. Skirmishers would be placed in front of the Roman line in order to inflict casualties on the enemy and reduce the amount of Comitatenses killed in battle. After Attila's invasion of the Western Roman Empire the Romans started to use mounted archers.[9] Manpower[edit] Numerous scholarly histories of the Roman military machine note the huge numbers of men that could be mobilized, more than any other Mediterranean power. This bounty of military resources enabled Rome to apply crushing pressure to its enemies, and stay in the field and replace losses, even after suffering setbacks. One historian of the Second Punic War states: According to Polybius (2.24), the total number of Roman and allied men capable of bearing arms in 225 BC exceeded 700,000 infantry and 70,000 cavalries. Brunt adjusted Polybius’ figures and estimated that the population of Italy, not including Greeks and Bruttians, exceeded 875,000 free adult males, from whom the Romans could levy troops. Rome not only had the potential to levy vast numbers of troops but did in fact field large armies in the opening stages of the war. Brunt estimates that Rome mobilized 108,000 men for service in the legions between 218 BC and 215 BC, while at the height of the war effort (214 BC to 212 BC) [against Hannibal] Rome was able to mobilize approximately 230,000 men. Against these mighty resources Hannibal led from Spain an army of approximately 50,000 infantry and 9,000 cavalry ... Rome's manpower reserves allowed it to absorb staggering losses yet still continue to field large armies. For example, according to Brunt, as many as 50,000 men were lost between 218 BC and 215 BC, but Rome continued to place between 14 and 25 legions in the field for the duration of the war. Moreover, as will be discussed below, Roman manpower allowed for the adoption of the so-called "Fabian strategy", which proved to be an effective response to Hannibal's apparent battlefield superiority. Put simply, the relative disparity in the number of available troops at the outset of the conflict meant that Hannibal had a much narrower margin for error than the Romans.[10] Equipment and training[edit] Further information: Roman military personal equipment and Roman legion Equipment[edit] Individual weapons, personal equipment and haulage[edit] A legionary typically carried around 27 kilograms (60 pounds) of armour, weapons, and equipment. This load consisted of armour, a sword, called a gladius, a shield, two pila (one heavy, one light) and 15 days' food rations. There were also tools for digging and constructing a castrum, the legions' fortified base camp. One writer recreates the following as to Caesar's army in Gaul:[11] Each soldier arranged his heavy pack on a T or Y-shaped rod, borne on his left shoulder. Shields were protected on the march with a hide cover. Each legionary carried about 5 days' worth of wheat, pulses or chickpeas, a flask of oil, and a mess kit with a dish, cup, and utensil. Personal items might include a dyed horsehair crest for the helmet, a semi-water-resistant oiled woollen cloak, socks and breeches for cold weather and a blanket. Entrenchment equipment included a shallow wicker basket for moving earth, a spade and/or pick-axe like dolabra or turf cutter, and two wooden staves to construct the next camp palisade. All these were arranged in the marching pack toted by each infantryman. Fighters travelled in groups of eight, and each octet was sometimes assigned a mule. The mule carried a variety of equipment and supplies, including a mill for grinding grain, a small clay oven for baking bread, cooking pots, spare weapons, waterskins, and tents. A Roman century had a complement of 10 mules, each attended by two non-combatants who handled foraging and water supply. A century might be supported by wagons in the rear, each drawn by six mules, and carrying tools, nails, water barrels, extra food and the tent and possessions of the centurion- commanding officer of the unit. Artillery package[edit] The legion also carried an artillery detachment with 30 pieces of artillery. This consisted of 10 stone-throwing onagers and 20 bolt-shooting ballistas; in addition, each of the legion's centuries had its own scorpio bolt thrower (60 total), together with supporting wagons to carry ammunition and spare parts. Bolts were used for targeted fire on human opponents, while stones were used against fortifications or as an area saturation weapon. The catapults were powered by rope and sinew, tightened by a ratchet and released, powered by the stored torsion energy. Caesar was to mount these in boats on some operations in Britain, striking fear in the heart of the native opponents according to his writings. His placement of siege engines and bolt throwers in the towers and along the wall of his enclosing fortifications at Alesia were critical to turning back the enormous tide of Gauls. These defensive measures, used in concert with the cavalry charge led by Caesar himself, broke the Gauls and won the battle—and therefore the war—for good. Bolt-throwers like the Scorpio were mobile and could be deployed in defence of camps, field entrenchments and even in the open field by no more than two or three men.[12] Training[edit] Over time the military system changed its equipment and roles, but throughout the course of Roman history, it always remained a disciplined and professional war machine. Soldiers carried out training common to every organized army, from initial muster, arms and weapons drill, formation marching and tactical exercises. According to Vegetius, during the four-month initial training of a Roman legionary, marching skills were taught before recruits ever handled a weapon, since any formation would be split up by stragglers at the back or soldiers trundling along at differing speeds.[13] Standards varied over time, but normally recruits were first required to complete 20 Roman miles (29.62 km or 18.405 modern miles) with 20.5 kg in five summer hours (the Roman day was divided into 12 hours regardless of season, as was the night), which was known as "the regular step" or "military pace".[14] They then progressed to the "faster step" or "full pace"[14] and were required to complete 24 Roman miles (35.544 km or 22.086 modern miles) in five summer hours loaded with 20.5 kilograms (45 lb). The typical conditioning regime also included gymnastics and swimming to build physical strength and fitness.[15] After conditioning, the recruits underwent weapons training; this was deemed of such importance that weapons instructors generally received double rations.[13] Legionaries were trained to thrust with their gladii because they could defend themselves behind their large shields (scuta) while stabbing the enemy. These training exercises began with thrusting a wooden gladius and throwing wooden pila into a quintain (wooden dummy or stake) while wearing full armor. Their wooden swords and pila were designed to be twice as heavy as their metal counterparts so that the soldiers could wield a true gladius with ease. Next, soldiers progressed to armatura, a term for sparring that was also used to describe the similar one-on-one training of gladiators. Unlike earlier training, the wooden weapons used for armatura were the same weight as the weapons they emulated. Vegetius notes that roofed halls were built to allow for these drills to continue throughout the winter.[13] Other training exercises taught the legionary to obey commands and assume battle formations.[16] At the end of training the legionary had to swear an oath of loyalty to the SPQR (Senatus Populusque Romanus, the senate and the Roman people) or later to the emperor. The soldier was then given a diploma and sent off to fight for his living and the glory and honour of Rome.[16] Organization, leadership and logistics[edit] Command, control and structure[edit] Once the soldier had finished his training he was typically assigned to a legion, the basic mass fighting force. The legion was split into ten sub-units called cohorts, roughly comparable to a modern infantry battalion. The cohorts were further sub-divided into three maniples, which in turn were split into two centuries of about 80–100 men each. The first cohort in a legion was usually the strongest, with the fullest personnel complement and with the most skilled, experienced men. Several legions grouped together made up a distinctive field force or "army".[16] Fighting strength could vary but generally a legion was made up of 4,800 soldiers, 60 centurions, 300 artillerymen, and 100 engineers and artificers, and 1,200 non-combatants. Each legion was supported by a unit of 300 cavalries, the equites. Supreme command of either legion or army was by consul or proconsul or a praetor, or in cases of emergency in the republican era, a dictator. A praetor or a propraetor could only command a single legion and not a consular army, which normally consisted of two legions plus the allies. In the early republican period, it was customary for an army to have dual commands, with different consuls holding the office on alternate days. In later centuries this was phased out in favour of one overall army commander. The legati were officers of senatorial rank who assisted the supreme commander. Tribunes were young men of aristocratic rank who often supervised administrative tasks like camp construction. Centurions (roughly equivalent in rank to today's non-commissioned or junior officers, but functioning as modern captains in field operations) commanded cohorts, maniples and centuries. Specialist groups like engineers and artificers were also used. Military structure and ranks[edit] For an in-depth analysis of ranks, types, and historical units, see Structural history of the Roman military and Roman legion for a detailed breakdown. Below is a very basic summary of the legion's structure and ranks.[17] Force structure[edit] Contubernium: "tent unit" of eight men Centuria: 80 men commanded by a centurion Cohort: six centuries or a total of 480 fighting men. Added to these were officers. The first cohort was double strength in terms of manpower and generally held the best fighting men. Legion: made up of 10 cohorts Field army: a grouping of several legions and auxiliary cohorts Equites: Each legion was supported by 300 cavalry (equites), sub-divided into ten turmae Auxilia and velites: allied contingents, often providing light infantry and specialist fighting services, like archers, slingers or javelin-men. They were usually formed into the light infantry or velites. Auxilia in the republican period also formed allied heavy legions to complement Roman citizen formations. Non-combatant support: generally the men who tended the mules, forage, watering and sundries of the baggage train 4,500–5,200 men in a legion Rank summary[edit] Consul – an elected official with military and civic duties; like a co-president (there were two), but also a major military commander Praetor – appointed military commander of a legion or grouping of legions, also a government official Legatus legionis – the legate or overall legion commander, usually filled by a senator Tribune – young officer, second in command of the legion. Other lesser tribunes served as junior officers. Prefect – third in command of the legion. There were various types. The prefectus equitarius commanded a unit of cavalry Primus pilus – commanding centurion for the first cohort – the senior centurion of the entire legion Centurion – basic commander of the century. Prestige varied based on the cohort they supervised. Decurio – commander of the cavalry unit or turma Aquilifer – standard bearer of each legion – a position of much prestige Signifer – one for each century, handled financial matters and decorations Optio – equivalent to a sergeant, second in command for the centurion Cornicen – hornblower or signaler Imaginifer – carried standard bearing the emperor's image Decanus – equivalent to a corporal, commanded an eight-man tent party Munifex – basic legionary – the lowest of the trained rank and file Tirones – new recruit to the legions, a novice Logistics[edit] Roman logistics were among some of the best in the ancient world over the centuries, from the deployment of purchasing agents to systematically buy provisions during a campaign, to the construction of roads and supply caches, to the rental of shipping if the troops had to move by water. Heavy equipment and material (tents, artillery, extra weapons and equipment, millstones etc.) were moved by pack animal and cart, while troops carried weighty individual packs with them, including staves and shovels for constructing the fortified camps. Typical of all armies, local opportunities were also exploited by troops on the spot, and the fields of peasant farmers who were near the zone of conflict might be stripped to meet army needs. As with most armed forces, a variety of traders, hucksters, prostitutes and other miscellaneous service providers trailed in the wake of the Roman fighting men.[18] Battle[edit] Initial preparations and movement for battle[edit] The approach march. Once the legion was deployed on an operation, the marching began. The approach to the battlefield was made in several columns, enhancing manoeuvrability. Typically a strong vanguard preceded the main body and included scouts, cavalry and light troops. A tribune or other officer often accompanied the vanguard to survey the terrain for possible camp locations. Flank and reconnaissance elements were also deployed to provide the usual covering security. Behind the vanguard came the main body of heavy infantry. Each legion marched as a distinct formation and was accompanied by its own baggage train. The last legion usually provided the rear force, although several recently raised units might occupy this final echelon. Construction of fortified camps. Legions on a campaign typically established a strong field camp, complete with palisade and a deep ditch, providing a basis for supply storage, troop marshalling and defence. Camps were recreated each time the army moved and were constructed with a view to both military necessity and religious symbolism. There were always four gateways, connected by two main crisscrossing streets, with the intersection at a concentration of command tents in the centre. Space was also made for an altar and religious gathering area. Everything was standardized, from the positioning of baggage, equipment and specific army units, to the duties of officers who were to set up sentries, pickets and orders for the next day's march. Construction could take between 2 and 5 hours with part of the army labouring, while the rest stood guard, depending on the tactical situation. The shape of the camp was generally rectangular but could vary based on the terrain or tactical situation. A distance of about 60 meters was left clear between the entrenchments and the first row of troop tents. This gap provided space for marshalling the legionnaires for battle and kept the troop area out of enemy missile range.[19] No other ancient army persisted over such a long period in systematic camp construction like the Romans, even if the army rested for only a single day.[20] Breaking camp and marching. After a regimented breakfast at the allocated time, trumpets were sounded and the camp's tents and huts were dismantled and preparations made for departure. The trumpet then sounded again with the signal for "stand by to march". Mules and wagons of the baggage train would be loaded and units formed up. The camp would then be burned to the ground to prevent its later occupation and use by the enemy. The trumpets would then be sounded for a final time and then the troops were asked three times whether they were ready, to which they were expected to shout together "Ready!", before marching off.[21] Intelligence. Good Roman commanders did not hesitate to exploit useful intelligence, particularly where a siege situation or impending clash in the field was developing. Information was gathered from spies, collaborators, diplomats and envoys, and allies. Intercepted messages during the Second Punic War for example were an intelligence coup for the Romans, and enabled them to dispatch two armies to find and destroy Hasdrubal's Carthaginian force, preventing his reinforcement of Hannibal. Commanders also kept an eye on the situation in Rome since political enemies and rivals could use an unsuccessful campaign to inflict painful career and personal damage. During this initial phase, the usual field reconnaissance was also conducted - patrols might be sent out, raids mounted to probe for weaknesses, prisoners snatched, and local inhabitants intimidated.[18] Morale. If the field of potential battle were near, the movement became more careful and more tentative. Several days might be spent in a location studying the terrain and opposition, while the troops were prepared mentally and physically for battle. Pep talks, sacrifices to the gods and the announcements of good omens might be carried out. A number of practical demonstrations might also be undertaken to test enemy reaction as well as to build troop morale. Part of the army might be led out of the camp and drawn up in battle array towards the enemy. If the enemy refused to come out and at least make a demonstration, the commander could claim a moral advantage for his men, contrasting the timidity of the opposition with the resolution of his fighting forces.[18] Historian Adrian Goldsworthy notes that such tentative pre-battle manoeuvring was typical of ancient armies as each side sought to gain the maximum advantage before the encounter.[22] During this period, some ancient writers paint a picture of meetings between opposing commanders for negotiation or general discussion, as with the famous pre-clash conversation between Hannibal and Scipio at Zama. It's unknown if the recorded flowery speeches are non-fiction, but these encounters don't show a record of resolving the conflict by means other than the anticipated battle. Deployment for combat[edit] Pre-battle manoeuvre gave the competing commanders a feel for the impending clash, but final outcomes could be unpredictable, even after the start of hostilities. Skirmishing could get out of hand, launching both main forces towards one another. Political considerations, exhaustion of supplies, or even rivalry between commanders for glory could also spark a forward launch, as at the Battle of the Trebia River.[18] The Roman army after the Marian reforms was also unique in the ancient world because when lined up opposite an enemy readying for battle it was completely silent except for the orders of officers and the sound of trumpets signalling orders. The reason for this was because the soldiers needed to be able to hear such instruction, the Optios of the Legions would patrol behind the century and anyone who was talking or failing to obey orders immediately was struck with the stick of the optio. This silence also had the unintended consequence of being very intimidating to its enemies because they recognized this took immense discipline to achieve before a battle. Layout of the triple line[edit] Once the machinery was in motion however, the Roman infantry typically was deployed, as the main body, facing the enemy. During deployment in the Republican era, the maniples were commonly arranged in triplex acies (triple battle order): that is, in three ranks, with the hastati in the first rank (that nearest the enemy), the principes in the second rank, and the veteran triarii in the third and final rank as barrier troops, or sometimes even further back as a strategic reserve. When in danger of imminent defeat, the first and second lines, the hastati and principes, ordinarily fell back on the triarii to reform the line to allow for either a counter-attack or an orderly withdrawal. Because falling back on the triarii was an act of desperation, to mention "returning to the triarii" ("ad triarios rediisse") became a common Roman phrase indicating one to be in a desperate situation.[23] Within this triplex acies system, contemporary Roman writers talk of the maniples adopting a checkered formation called quincunx when deployed for battle but not yet engaged. In the first line, the hastati left modest gaps between each maniple. The second line consisting of principes followed in a similar manner, lining up behind the gaps left by the first line.[24] This was also done by the third line, standing behind the gaps in the second line. The velites were deployed in front of this line in a continuous, loose-formation line.[25] The Roman manoeuvre was a complex one, filled with the dust of thousands of soldiers wheeling into place, and the shouting of officers moving to and from as they attempted to maintain order. Several thousand men had to be positioned from column into line, with each unit taking its designated place, along with light troops and cavalry. The fortified camps were laid out and organized to facilitate deployment. It might take some time for the final array of the host, but when accomplished the army's grouping of legions represented a formidable fighting force, typically arranged in three lines with a frontage as long as one mile (about 1.5 km).[26] A general three-line deployment was to remain over the centuries, although the Marian reforms phased out most divisions based on age and class, standardized weapons and reorganized the legions into bigger manoeuvre units like cohorts. The overall size of the legion and length of the soldier's service also increased on a more permanent basis.[27] Maneuvering[edit] As the army approached its enemy, the velites in front would throw their javelins at the enemy and then retreat through the gaps in the lines. This was an important innovation since in other armies of the period skirmishers would have to either retreat through their own army's ranks, causing confusion or else to flee around either flank of their own army. After the velites had retreated through the hastati, the 'posterior' century would march to the left and then forward so that they presented a solid line, creating a solid line of soldiers. The same procedure would be employed as they passed through the second and third ranks or turned to the side to channel down the gap between the first and second rows on route to help guard the legion's flanks.[28] At this point, the legion then presented a solid line to the enemy and the legion was in the correct formation for engagement. When the enemy closed, the hastati would charge. If they were losing the fight, the 'posterior' century returned to its position creating gaps again. Then the maniples would fall back through the gaps in the principes, who followed the same procedure to form a battle line and charge. If the principes could not break the enemy, they would retreat behind the triarii and the whole army would leave the battlefield in good order. According to some writers, the triarii formed a continuous line when they deployed, and their forward movement allowed scattered or discomfited units to rest and reform, to later rejoin the struggle.[29] The manipular system allowed engaging every kind of enemy even in rough terrain, because the legion had both flexibility and toughness according to the deployment of its lines. Lack of a strong cavalry corps, however, was a major flaw of the Roman forces. In the later imperial army, the general deployment was very similar, with the cohorts deploying in quincunx pattern. In a reflection of the earlier placement of the veteran triarii in the rear, the less experienced cohorts - usually the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 6th, and 8th - were in the front; the more experienced cohorts - 1st, 5th, 7th, 9th, and 10th - were placed behind.[30] Formations[edit] The above is only standard procedure and was often modified; for example, at Zama, Scipio deployed his entire legion in a single line to envelop Hannibal's army just as Hannibal had done at Cannae. A brief summary of alternative formations known to have been used is shown below: Combat[edit] Hand-to-hand engagement after the release of missile weapons: Once the deployment and initial skirmishing described above took place, the main body of heavy infantry closed the gap and attacked the double. The front ranks usually cast their pila, and the following ranks hurled theirs over the heads of the front-line fighters. After the pila were cast, the soldiers then drew their swords and engaged the enemy. Emphasis was on using the shield to provide maximum body coverage, and for pushing enemies, while attacking with their gladius in thrusts and short cuts in clinch, minimizing exposure to the enemy. In the combat that ensued, Roman discipline, heavy shield, armour and training were to give them important advantages in combat. The acute shock of combat: Some scholars of the Roman infantry maintain that the intense trauma and stress of hand-to-hand combat meant that the contenders did not simply hack at one another continuously until one dropped. Instead, there were short periods of intense, vicious fighting. If indecisive, the contenders might fall back a short distance to recuperate, and then surge forward to renew the struggle. Others behind them would be stepping up into the fray meanwhile, engaging new foes or covering their colleagues. The individual warrior could thus count on temporary relief, rather than endless fighting until death or crippling injury. As the battle progressed, the massive physical and mental stress intensified. The stamina and willpower demanded to make yet one more charge, to make yet one more surge grew even greater.[22] Eventually one side began to break down, and it is then that the greatest slaughter began. Use of war machines and covering fire: Many Roman battles, especially during the late empire, were fought with the preparatory fire from catapults, ballistas and onagers. These war machines, a form of ancient artillery, fired arrows and large stones towards the enemy (although many historians question the battlefield effectiveness of such weapons). Following this barrage, the Roman infantry advanced, in four lines, until they came within 30 meters of the enemy, then they halted, hurled their pila and charged. If the first line was repelled by the enemy, another line would rapidly resume the attack. Often this rapid sequence of deadly attacks proved the key to victory. Another common tactic was to taunt the enemy with feigned charges and rapid arrow fire by the auxiliares equites (auxiliary cavalry), forcing the enemy into pursuing them, and then leading the enemy into an ambush where they would be counterattacked by Roman heavy infantry and cavalry. 3-line system advantages[edit] Flexibility[edit] Some ancient sources such as Polybius seem to imply that the legions could fight with gaps in their lines. Yet, most sources seem to admit that more usually a line would form into a solid front. Various approaches have been taken to reconcile these possibilities with the ancient writings.[31] The advantages of gaps are obvious when a formation is on the move- it can more easily flow around obstacles and manoeuvre and control are enhanced and, as the Romans did in the pre-Marius republic, place baggage between the lines meaning that the cargo cannot be easily captured and that the army can quickly get ready for a battle by using it as cover. After the approach marching was complete, it would be extremely difficult to deploy an unbroken army of men for combat across any but the flattest ground without some sort of intervals. Many ancient armies used gaps of some sort, even the Carthaginians, who typically withdrew their initial skirmishing troops between the spaces before the main event. Even more loosely organized enemies like the Germanic hosts typically charged in distinct groups with small gaps between them, rather than marching up in a neat line.[32] Fighting with gaps is thus feasible as writers like Polybius assert. According to those who support the quincunx formation view, what made the Roman approach stand out is that their intervals were generally larger and more systematically organized than those of other ancient armies. Each gap was covered by maniples or cohorts from lines farther back. Penetration of any significance could not just slip in unmolested. It would not only be mauled as it fought past the gauntlet of the first line but would also clash with aggressive units moving up to plug the space.[33] From a larger standpoint, as the battle waxed and waned, fresh units might be deployed through the intervals to relieve the men of the first line, allowing continual pressure to be brought forward. Mixing of a continuous front with interval fighting[edit] One scenario for not using gaps is deployment in a limited space, such as the top of a hill or ravine, where extensive spreading out would not be feasible. Another is a particular attack formation, such as the wedge discussed above, or an encirclement as at the Battle of Ilipa. Yet another is a closing phase manoeuvre when a solid line is constructed to make a last, final push as in the battle of Zama. During the maelstrom of battle, it is also possible that as the units merged into line, the general checkerboard spacing became more compressed or even disappeared, and the fighting would see a more or less solid line engaged with the enemy. Thus gaps at the beginning of the struggle might tend to vanish in the closing phases.[34] Some historians view the intervals as primarily useful in maneuver. Before the legionaries closed with the enemy each echelon would form a solid line to engage. If things went badly for the first line, it would retreat through the gaps and the second echelon moved up- again forming a continuous front. Should they be discomfited, there still remained the veterans of the triarii who let the survivors retreat through the preset gaps. The veterans then formed a continuous front to engage the enemy or provided cover for the retreat of the army as a whole. The same procedure was followed when the triarii was phased out - intervals for manoeuvre, reforming and recovery- solid line to engage.[35] Some writers maintain that in Caesar's armies the use of the quincunx and its gaps seems to have declined, and his legions generally deployed in three unbroken lines as shown above, with four cohorts in front, and three apiece in the echeloned order. The relief was provided by the second and third lines 'filtering' forward to relieve their comrades in small groups, while the exhausted and wounded eased back from the front.[36] The Romans still remained flexible however, using gaps and deploying four or sometimes two lines based on the tactical situation.[37] Line spacing and combat stamina[edit] Another unique feature of the Roman infantry was the depth of its spacing. Most ancient armies deployed in shallower formations, particularly phalanx-type forces. Phalanxes might deepen their ranks heavily to add both stamina and shock power, but their general approach still favoured one massive line, as opposed to the deep three-layer Roman arrangement. The advantage of the Roman system is that it allowed the continual funnelling or metering of combat power forward over a longer period—massive, steadily renewed pressure to the front—until the enemy broke. Deployment of the second and third lines required careful consideration by the Roman commander. Deployed too early, and they might get entangled in the frontal fighting and become exhausted. Deployed too late, and they might be swept away in a rout if the first line began to break. Tight control had to be maintained, hence the 3rd line triarii were sometimes made to squat or kneel, effectively discouraging premature movement to the front. The Roman commander was thus generally mobile, constantly moving from spot to spot, and often riding back in person to fetch reserves if there was no time for standard messenger service. A large number of officers in the typical Roman army, and the flexible breakdown into sub-units like cohorts or maniples greatly aided coordination of such moves.[38] Whatever the actual formation took however, the ominous funnelling or surge of combat power up to the front remained constant: When the first line as a whole had done its best and become weakened and exhausted by losses, it gave way to the relief of freshmen from the second line who, passing through it gradually, pressed forward one by one, or in single file, and worked their way into the fight in the same way. Meanwhile the tired men of the original first line, when sufficiently rested, reformed and re-entered the fight. This continued until all men of the first and second lines had been engaged. This does not presuppose an actual withdrawal of the first line, but rather a merging, a blending or a coalescing of both lines. Thus the enemy was given no rest and was continually opposed by fresh troops until, exhausted and demoralized, he yielded to repeated attacks.[39] Post-deployment commands[edit] Roman re-enactors demonstrate a variant of the Roman testudo formation Whatever the deployment, the Roman army was marked both by flexibility and strong discipline and cohesion. Different formations were assumed according to different tactical situations. Repellere equites ("repel horsemen/knights") was the formation used to resist cavalry. The legionaries would assume a square formation, holding their pila as spears in the space between their shields and strung together shoulder to shoulder. At the command iacite pila, the legionaries hurled their pila at the enemy. At the command cuneum formate, the infantry formed a wedge to charge and break enemy lines. This formation was used as a shock tactic. At the command contendite vestra sponte, the legionaries assumed an aggressive stance and attacked every opponent they faced. At the command orbem formate, the legionaries assumed a circle-like formation with the archers placed in the midst of and behind the legionaries providing missile fire support. This tactic was used mainly when a small number of legionaries had to hold a position and were surrounded by enemies. At the command ciringite frontem, the legionaries held their position. At the command frontem allargate, a scattered formation was adopted. At the command testudinem formate, the legionaries assumed the testudo (tortoise) formation. This was slow-moving but almost impenetrable to enemy fire, and thus very effective during sieges and/or when facing off against enemy archers. However, the testudo formation didn't allow for effective close combat and therefore it was used when the enemy were far enough away so as the legionaries could get into another formation before being attacked. At the command tecombre, the legionaries would break the Testudo formation and revert to their previous formation. At the command Agmen formate, the legionaries assumed a square formation, which was also the typical shape of a century in battle. Siegecraft and fortifications[edit] Besieging cities[edit] Oppidum expugnare was the Roman term for besieging cities. It was divided into three phases: Modern reconstruction of a Scorpio. In the first phase, engineers (the cohors fabrorum) built a fortified camp near the city with walls of circumvallation and at the command 'turres extruere' built watch towers to prevent the enemy from bringing in reinforcements. Siege towers were built, trenches were dug and traps set all around the city. Also second, exterior line of walls (contravallation) was built around the city facing the enemy, as Caesar did at the Battle of Alesia. Sometimes the Romans would mine the enemy's walls. The second phase began with onager and ballista fire to cover the approach of the siege towers, which were full of legionaries ready to assault the wall's defenders. Meanwhile, other cohorts approached the city's wall in testudo formation, bringing up battering rams and ladders to breach the gates and scale the walls. The third phase included the opening of the city's main gate by the cohorts which had managed to break through or scale the walls, provided the rams had not knocked the gate open. Once the main gate was opened or the walls breached, the cavalry and other cohorts entered the city to finish off the remaining defenders. Field fortifications[edit] While strong cities/forts and elaborate sieges to capture them were common throughout the ancient world, the Romans were unique among ancient armies in their extensive use of field fortifications. In campaign after campaign, enormous effort was expended to dig—a job done by the ordinary legionary. His field pack included a shovel, a dolabra or pickaxe, and a wicker basket for hauling dirt. Some soldiers also carried a type of turf cutter. With these, they dug trenches, built walls and palisades and constructed assault roads. The operations of Julius Caesar at Alesia are well known. The Gallic city was surrounded by massive double walls penning in defenders, and keeping out relieving attackers. A network of camps and forts were included in these works. The inner trench alone was 20 feet (6.1 m) deep, and Caesar diverted a river to fill it with water. The ground was also sown with caltrops of iron barbs at various places to discourage assault. Surprisingly for such an infantry centred battle, Caesar relied heavily on cavalry forces to counter Gallic sorties. Ironically, many of these were from Germanic tribes who had come to terms earlier.[40] The power of Roman field camps has been noted earlier, but in other actions, the Romans sometimes used trenches to secure their flanks against envelopment when they were outnumbered, as Caesar did during operations in Belgaic Gaul. In the Brittany region of France, moles and breakwaters were constructed at enormous effort to assault the estuarine strongholds of the Gauls. Internal Roman fighting between Caesar and Pompey also saw the frequent employment of trenches, counter-trenches, dug-in strong points, and other works as the contenders manoeuvred against each other in field combat.[40] In the latter stages of the empire, the extensive use of such field fortifications declined as the heavy infantry itself was phased down. Nevertheless, they were an integral part of the relentless Roman rise to dominance over large parts of the ancient world.[41] Infantry effectiveness[edit] Roman infantry versus the Macedonian phalanx[edit] Strengths of the Macedonian phalanx. Prior to the rise of Rome, the Macedonian phalanx was the premiere infantry force in the Western World. It had proven itself on the battlefields of Mediterranean Europe, from Sparta to Macedonia, and had met and overcome several strong non-European armies from Persia to Pakistan/Northwest India. Packed into a dense armoured mass, and equipped with massive pikes 12 to 21 feet (6.4 m) in length, the phalanx was a formidable force. While defensive configurations were sometimes used, the phalanx was most effective when it was moving forward in attack, either in a frontal charge or in "oblique" or echeloned order against an opposing flank, as the victories of Alexander the Great and Theban innovator Epaminondas attest. When working with other formations—light infantry and cavalry—it was, at its height under Alexander, without peer.[42] Weaknesses of the Macedonian phalanx. Nevertheless, the Macedonian phalanx had key weaknesses. It had some manoeuvrability, but once a clash was joined this decreased, particularly on rough ground. Its "dense pack" approach also made it rigid. Compressed in the heat of battle, its troops could only primarily fight facing forward. The diversity of troops gave the phalanx great flexibility, but this diversity was a double-edged sword, relying on a mix of units that was complicated to control and position. These included not only the usual heavy infantrymen, cavalry and light infantry but also various elite units, medium armed groups, foreign contingents with their own styles and shock units of war-elephants.[43] Such "mixed" forces presented additional command and control problems. If properly organized and fighting together a long time under capable leaders, they could be very proficient. The campaigns of Alexander and Pyrrhus (a Hellenic-style formation of mixed contingents) show this. Without such long-term cohesion and leadership, however, their performance was uneven. By the time the Romans were engaging against Hellenistic armies, the Greeks had ceased to use strong flank guards and cavalry contingents, and their system had degenerated into a mere clash of phalanxes. This was the formation overcome by the Romans at the Battle of Cynoscephalae. Advantages of Roman infantry. The Romans themselves had retained some aspects of the classical phalanx (not to be confused with the Macedonian phalanx) in their early legions, most notably the final line of fighters in the classic "triple line", the spearmen of the triarii. The long pikes of the triarii were to eventually disappear, and all hands were uniformly equipped with short sword, shield and pilum, and deployed in the distinctive Roman tactical system, which provided more standardization and cohesion in the long run over the Hellenic type formations. Phalanxes facing the legion were vulnerable to the more flexible Roman "checkerboard" deployment, which provided each fighting man a good chunk of personal space to engage in close order fighting. The manipular system also allowed entire Roman sub-units to manoeuvre more widely, freed from the need to always remain tightly packed in rigid formation. The deep three-line deployment of the Romans allowed combat pressure to be steadily applied forward. Most phalanxes favoured one huge line several ranks deep. This might do well in the initial stages, but as the battle entangled more and more men, the stacked Roman formation allowed fresh pressure to be imposed over a more extended time. As combat lengthened and the battlefield compressed, the phalanx might thus become exhausted or rendered immobile, while the Romans still had enough left to not only manoeuvre but to make the final surges forward.[26] Hannibal's deployment at Zama appears to recognize this—hence the Carthaginian also used a deep three-layer approach, sacrificing his first two lower quality lines and holding back his combat-hardened veterans of Italy for the final encounter. Hannibal's arrangement had much to recommend it given his weakness in cavalry and infantry, but he made no provision for one line relieving the other as the Romans did. Each line fought its own lonely battle and the last ultimately perished when the Romans reorganized for a final surge. The legions also drilled and trained together over a more extended time, and were more uniform and streamlined, (unlike Hannibal's final force and others) enabling even less than brilliant army commanders to manoeuvre and position their forces proficiently. These qualities, among others, made them more than a match for the phalanx, when they met in combat.[32] According to Polybius, in his comparison of the phalanx versus the Roman system: ".. Whereas the phalanx requires one time and one type of ground. Its use requires flat and level ground which is unencumbered by any obstacles.. If the enemy refuses to come down to [meet it on the level ground].. what purpose can the phalanx serve?.. [Also] the phalanx soldier cannot operate in either smaller units or singly, whereas the Roman formation is highly flexible. Every Roman soldier.. can adapt himself equally well to any place of time and meet an attack from any quarter.. Accordingly, since the effective use of parts of the Roman army is so much superior, their plans are much more likely to achieve success."[42] Versus Pyrrhus[edit] See also: Pyrrhus of Epirus The Greek king Pyrrhus' phalangical system was to prove a tough trial for the Romans. Despite several defeats, the Romans inflicted such losses on the Epirote army that the phrase "Pyrrhic victory" has become a byword for a victory won at a terrible cost. A skilful and experienced commander, Pyrrhus deployed a typically mixed phalanx system, including shock units of war-elephants, and formations of light infantry (peltasts), elite units, and cavalry to support his infantry. Using these he was able to defeat the Romans twice, with a third battle deemed inconclusive or a limited Roman tactical success by many scholars. The battles below (see individual articles for detailed accounts) illustrate the difficulties of fighting against phalanx forces. If well-led and deployed (compare Pyrrhus to the fleeing Perseus at Pydna below), they presented a credible infantry alternative to the heavy legion. The Romans, however, were to learn from their mistakes. In subsequent battles after the Pyrrhic wars, they showed themselves masters of the Hellenic phalanx. Battle of Heraclea Battle of Asculum Battle of Beneventum Notable triumphs[edit] Battle of Cynoscephalae[edit] Main article: Battle of Cynoscephalae In this battle the Macedonian phalanx originally held the high ground but all of its units had not been properly positioned due to earlier skirmishing. Nevertheless, an advance by its left-wing drove back the Romans, who counterattacked on the right flank and made some progress against a somewhat disorganized Macedonian left. However, the issue was still in doubt until an unknown tribune (officer) detached 20 maniples from the Roman line and made an encircling attack against the Macedonian rear. This caused the enemy phalanx to collapse, securing a route for the Romans. The more flexible, streamlined legionary organization had exploited the weaknesses of the densely packed phalanx. Such triumphs secured Roman hegemony in Greece and adjoining lands. Battle of Pydna[edit] Main article: Battle of Pydna At Pydna the contenders deployed on a relatively flat plain, and the Macedonians had augmented the infantry with a sizeable cavalry contingent. At the hour of decision, the enemy phalanx advanced in formidable array against the Roman line and made some initial progress. However, the ground it had to advance over was rough, and the powerful phalangial formation lost its tight cohesion. The Romans absorbed the initial shock and came on into the fray, where their more spacious formation and continuously applied pressure proved decisive in hand-to-hand combat on the rough ground. Shield and sword at close quarters on such terrain neutralized the long pike, and supplementary Macedonian weapons (lighter armour and a dagger-like short sword) made an indifferent showing against the skilful and aggressive assault of the heavy Roman infantrymen. The opposition also failed to deploy supporting forces effectively to help the phalanx at its time of dire need. Indeed, the Macedonian commander, Perseus, seeing the situation deteriorating, seems to have fled without even bringing his cavalry into the engagement. The affair was decided in less than two hours, with a comprehensive defeat for the Macedonians. Other anti-phalanx tactics[edit] "Breaking phalanxes" illustrates more of the Roman army's flexibility. When the Romans faced phalangite armies, the legions often deployed the velites in front of the enemy with the command to contendite vestra sponte (attack), presumably with their javelins, to cause confusion and panic in the solid blocks of phalanxes. Meanwhile, auxilia archers were deployed on the wings of the legion in front of the cavalry, in order to defend their withdrawal. These archers were ordered to eiaculare flammas, fire incendiary arrows into the enemy. The cohorts then advanced in a wedge formation, supported by the velites' and auxiliaries' fire, and charged into the phalanx at a single point, breaking it, then flanking it with the cavalry to seal the victory. See the Battle of Beneventum for evidence of fire-arrows being used. Versus Hannibal's Carthage[edit] Tactical superiority of Hannibal's forces. While not a classic phalanx force, Hannibal's army was composed of "mixed" contingents and elements common to Hellenic formations, and it is told that towards the end of his life, Hannibal reportedly named Pyrrhus as the commander of the past that he most admired[44] Rome however had blunted Pyrrhus' hosts prior to the rise of Hannibal, and given their advantages in organization, discipline, and resource mobilization, why did they not make a better showing in the field against the Carthaginian, who throughout most of his campaign in Italy suffered from numerical inferiority and lack of support from his homeland? Hannibal's individual genius, the steadiness of his core troops (forged over several years of fighting together in Spain, and later in Italy) and his cavalry arm seem to be the decisive factors. Time after time Hannibal exploited the tendencies of the Romans, particularly their eagerness to close and achieve a decisive victory. The cold, tired, wet legionnaires that slogged out of the Trebia River to form up on the river bank are but one example of how Hannibal forced or manipulated the Romans into fighting on his terms, and on the ground of his own choosing. The later debacles at Lake Trasimene and Cannae, forced the proud Romans to avoid battle, shadowing the Carthaginians from the high ground of the Apennines, unwilling to risk a significant engagement on the plains where the enemy cavalry held sway.[32] Growing Roman tactical sophistication and ability to adapt overcome earlier disasters. But while the case of Hannibal underscored that the Romans were far from invincible, it also demonstrated their long-term strengths. Rome had a vast manpower surplus far outnumbering Hannibal that gave them more options and flexibility. They isolated and eventually bottled up the Carthaginians and hastened their withdrawal from Italy with the constant manoeuvre. More importantly, they used their manpower resources to launch an offensive into Spain and Africa. They were willing to absorb the humiliation in Italy and remain on the strategic defensive, but with typical relentless persistence they struck elsewhere, to finally crush their foes.[32] They also learned from those enemies. The operations of Scipio were an improvement on some of those who had previously faced Hannibal, showing a higher level of advance thinking, preparation and organization. (Compare with Sempronius at the Battle of the Trebia River for example). Scipio's contribution was in part to implement more flexible manoeuvre of tactical units, instead of the straight-ahead, three-line grind favoured by some contemporaries. He also made better use of cavalry, traditionally an arm in which the Romans were lacking. His operations also included pincer movements, a consolidated battle line, and "reverse Cannae" formations and cavalry movements. His victories in Spain and the African campaign demonstrated a new sophistication in Roman warfare and reaffirmed the Roman capacity to adapt, persist and overcome.[16] See detailed battles: Battle of Baecula Battle of Ilipa Battle of Zama Roman infantry versus Gallic and the Germanic tribes[edit] Barbarian armies[edit] Views of the Gallic enemies of Rome have varied widely. Some older histories consider them to be backward savages, ruthlessly destroying the civilization and "grandeur that was Rome." Some modernist views see them in a proto-nationalist light, ancient freedom fighters resisting the iron boot of empire. Often their bravery is celebrated as worthy adversaries of Rome. See the Dying Gaul for an example. The Gallic opposition was also composed of a large number of different peoples and tribes, geographically ranging from the mountains of Switzerland to the lowlands of France and thus are not easy to categorize. The term "Gaul" has also been used interchangeably to describe Celtic peoples farther afield in Britain adding even more to the diversity of peoples lumped together under this name. From a military standpoint, however, they seem to have shared certain general characteristics: tribal polities with a relatively small and lesser elaborated state structure, light weaponry, fairly unsophisticated tactics and organization, a high degree of mobility, and inability to sustain combat power in their field forces over a lengthy period.[45] Roman sources reflect on the prejudices of their times, but nevertheless testify to the Gauls' fierceness and bravery. "Their chief weapons were long, two-edged swords of soft iron. For defence, they carried small wicker shields. Their armies were undisciplined mobs, greedy for plunder.. Brave to the point of recklessness, they were formidable warriors, and the ferocity of their first assault inspired terror even in the ranks of veteran armies."[46] Early Gallic victories[edit] Though popular accounts celebrate the legions and an assortment of charismatic commanders quickly vanquishing massive hosts of "wild barbarians",[47] Rome suffered a number of early defeats against such tribal armies. As early as the Republican period (circa 390–387 BC), they had sacked Rome under Brennus, and had won several other victories such as the Battle of Noreia and the Battle of Arausio. The foremost Gallic triumph in this early period was "The Day of Allia"- July 18- when Roman troops were routed and driven into the Allia River. Henceforth, July 18 was considered an unlucky date on the Roman Calendar.[48] Some writers suggest that as a result of such debacles, the expanding Roman power began to adjust to this vigorous, fast-moving new enemy.[49] The Romans began to phase out the monolithic phalanx they formerly fought in and adopted the more flexible manipular formation. The circular hoplite shield was also enlarged and eventually replaced with the rectangular scutum for better protection. The heavy phalanx spear was replaced by the pila, suitable for throwing. Only the veterans of the triarii retained the long spear- vestige of the former phalanx. Such early reforms also aided the Romans in their conquest of the rest of Italy over such foes as the Samnites, Latins and Greeks.[50] As time went on Roman arms saw increasing triumph over the Gallics, particularly in the campaigns of Caesar. In the early imperial period, however, Germanic warbands inflicted one of Rome's greatest military defeats, (the Battle of the Teutoburg Forest) which saw the destruction of three imperial legions and was to place a limit on Roman expansion in the West. And it was these Germanic tribes in part (most having some familiarity with Rome and its culture, and becoming more Romanized themselves) that were to eventually bring about the Roman military's final demise in the West. Ironically, in the final days, the bulk of the fighting was between forces composed mostly of barbarians on either side.[51] Tactical performance versus Gallic and Germanic opponents[edit] Gallic and Germanic strengths[edit] Whatever their particular culture, the Gallic and Germanic tribes generally proved themselves to be tough opponents, racking up several victories over their enemies. Some historians show that they sometimes used massed fighting in tightly packed phalanx-type formations with overlapping shields, and employed shield coverage during sieges. In open battle, they sometimes used a triangular "wedge" style formation in attack. Their greatest hope of success lay in 4 factors: (a) numerical superiority, (b) surprising the Romans (via an ambush for example) or in (c) advancing quickly to the fight, or (d) engaging the Romans over heavily covered or difficult terrain where units of the fighting horde could shelter within striking distance until the hour of decision, or if possible, withdraw and regroup between successive charges.[52] Most significant Gallic and Germanic victories show two or more of these characteristics. The Battle of the Teutoburg Forest contains all four: numerical superiority, surprise, quick charges to close rapidly, and favorable terrain and environmental conditions (thick forest and pounding rainstorms) that hindered Roman movement and gave the warriors enough cover to conceal their movements and mount successive attacks against the Roman line. Another factor in the Romans' defeat was a treacherous defection by Arminius and his contingent.[53] Gallic and Germanic weaknesses[edit] Weaknesses in organization and equipment. Against the fighting men from the legion however, the Gauls, Iberians and Germanic forces faced a daunting task. The barbarians' rudimentary organization and tactics fared poorly against the well-oiled machinery that was the Legion. The fierceness of the Gallic and Germanic charges is often commented upon by some writers, and in certain circumstances, they could overwhelm Roman lines. Nevertheless, the in-depth Roman formation allowed adjustments to be made, and the continual application of forwarding pressure made long-term combat a hazardous proposition for the Gauls. Flank attacks were always possible, but the legion was flexible enough to pivot to meet this, either through sub-unit manoeuvre or through the deployment of lines farther back. The cavalry screen on the flanks also added another layer of security, as did nightly regrouping in fortified camps. The Gauls and Germans also fought with little or no armour and with weaker shields, putting them at a disadvantage against the legion. Other items of Roman equipment from studded sandals, to body armour, to metal helmets added to Roman advantages. Generally speaking, the Gauls and Germans needed to get into good initial position against the Romans and to overwhelm them in the early phases of the battle. An extended set-piece slogging match between the lightly armed tribesmen and the well-organized heavy legionaries usually spelt doom for the tribal fighters.[52] Caesar's slaughter of the Helvetii near the Saône River is just one example of tribal disadvantage against the well-organized Romans,[54] as is the victory of Germanicus at the Weser River and Agricola against the Celtic tribesmen of Caledonia (Scotland) circa 84 A.D.[55] Weaknesses in logistics. Roman logistics also provided a trump card against Germanic foes as it had against so many previous foes. Tacitus in his Annals reports that the Roman commander Germanicus recognized that continued operations in Gaul would require long trains of men and material to come overland, where they would be subject to attack as they traversed the forests and swamps. He, therefore, opened sea and river routes, moving large quantities of supplies and reinforcements relatively close to the zone of battle, bypassing the dangerous land routes. In addition, the Roman fortified camps provided secure staging areas for offensive, defensive and logistical operations, once their troops were deployed. Assault roads and causeways were constructed on the marshy ground to facilitate manoeuvre, sometimes under direct Gallic attack. These Roman techniques repeatedly defeated their Germanic adversaries.[56] While Germanic leaders and fighters influenced by Roman methods sometimes adapted them, most tribes did not have the strong organization of the Romans. As German scholar Hans Delbruck notes in his "History of the Art of War": ".. the superiority of the Roman art of warfare was based on the army organization.. a system that permitted very large masses of men to be concentrated at a given point, to move in an orderly fashion, to be fed, to be kept together. The Gauls could do none of these things."[57] Gallic and Germanic chariots[edit] The Gallic also demonstrated a high level of tactical prowess in some areas. Gallic chariot warfare, for example, showed a high degree of integration and coordination with infantry, and Gallic horse and chariot assaults sometimes threatened Roman forces in the field with annihilation. At the Battle of Sentinum for example, c. 295 BC, the Roman and Campanian cavalry encountered Gallic war-chariots and were routed in confusion—driven back from the Roman infantry by the unexpected appearance of the fast-moving Gallic assault. The discipline of the Roman infantry restored the line, however, and a counterattack eventually defeated the Gallic forces and their allies.[58] The accounts of Polybius leading up to the Battle of Telamon, c. 225 BC mention chariot warfare, but it was ultimately unsuccessful. The Gauls met comprehensive defeat by the Roman legions under Papus and Regulus. Chariot forces also attacked the legions as they were disembarking from ships during Caesar's invasion of Britain, but the Roman commander drove off the fast-moving assailants using covering fire (slings, arrows and engines of war) from his ships and reinforcing his shore party of infantry to charge and drive off the attack. In the open field against Caesar, the Gallic/Celtics apparently deployed chariots with a driver and an infantry fighter armed with javelins. During the clash, the chariots would drop off their warriors to attack the enemy and retire a short distance away, massed in reserve. From this position, they could retrieve the assault troops if the engagement was going badly, or apparently, pick them up and deploy elsewhere. Caesar's troops were discomfited by one such attack, and he met it by withdrawing into his fortified redoubt. A later Gallic attack against the Roman camp was routed.[59] Superb as the Gallic fighters were, chariots were already declining as an effective weapon of war in the ancient world with the rise of mounted cavalry.[60] At the battle of Mons Grapius in Caledonia (circa 84AD), Celtic chariots made an appearance. However, they were no longer used in an offensive role but primarily for the pre-battle show - riding back and forth and hurling insults. The main encounter was decided by infantry and mounted cavalry.[55] Superior tactical organization: victory of Caesar at the Sambre River[edit] Superior Gallic mobility and numbers often troubled Roman arms, whether deployed in decades-long mobile or guerrilla warfare or in decisive field engagement. The near-defeat of Caesar in his Gallic campaign confirms this latter pattern but also shows the strengths of Roman tactical organization and discipline. At the Battle of the Sabis river, (see more detailed article) contingents of the Nervii, Atrebates, Veromandui and Aduatuci tribes massed secretly in the surrounding forests as the main Roman force was busy making camp on the opposite side of the river. Some distance away behind them slogged two slow-moving legions with the baggage train. Engaged in foraging and camp construction the Roman forces were somewhat scattered. As camp building commenced, the barbarian forces launched a ferocious attack, streaming across the shallow water and quickly assaulting the distracted Romans. This incident is discussed in Caesar's Gallic War Commentaries.[61] So far the situation looked promising for the warrior host.[45] The 4 conditions above were in their favour: (a) numerical superiority, (b) the element of surprise, (c) a quick advance/assault, and (d) favourable terrain that masked their movements until the last minute. Early progress was spectacular as the initial Roman dispositions were driven back. A rout looked possible. Caesar himself rallied sections of his endangered army, impressing resolve upon the troops. With their customary discipline and cohesion, the Romans then began to drive back the barbarian assault. A charge by the Nervi tribe through a gap between the legions however almost turned the tide again, as the onrushing warriors seized the Roman camp and tried to outflank the other army units engaged with the rest of the tribal host. The initial phase of the clash had passed however and a slogging match ensued. The arrival of the two rear legions that had been guarding the baggage reinforced the Roman lines. Led by the 10th Legion, a counterattack was mounted with these reinforcements that broke the back of the barbarian effort and sent the tribesmen reeling in retreat. It was a close-run thing, illustrating both the fighting prowess of the tribal forces and the steady, disciplined cohesion of the Romans. Ultimately, the latter was to prove decisive in Rome's long fought conquest of Gaul. Persisting logistics strategy: Gallic victory at Gergovia[edit] As noted above, the fierce charge of the Gauls and their individual prowess is frequently acknowledged by several ancient Roman writers.[62] The Battle of Gergovia however demonstrates that the Gallic were capable of a level of strategic insight and operation beyond merely mustering warriors for an open field clash. Under their war leader Vercingetorix, the Gallic pursued what some modern historians have termed a "persisting" or "logistics strategy" - a mobile approach relying not on direct open field clashes, but avoidance of major battle, "scorched earth" denial of resources, and the isolation and piecemeal destruction of Roman detachments and smaller unit groupings.[63] When implemented consistently, this strategy saw some success against Roman operations. According to Caesar himself, during the siege of the town of Bourges, the lurking warbands of Gauls were: "on the watch for our foraging and grain-gatherer parties, when necessarily scattered far afield he attacked them and inflicted serious losses... This imposed such scarcity upon the army that for several days they were without grain and staved off starvation only by driving cattle from remote villages."[64] Caesar countered with a strategy of enticing the Gallic forces out into open battle, or of blockading them into submission. At the town of Gergovia, resource denial was combined with a concentration of superior force and multiple threats from more than one direction. This caused the opposing Roman forces to divide and ultimately fail. Gergovia was situated on the high ground of a tall hill, and Vercingetorix carefully drew up the bulk of his force on the slope, positioning allied tribes in designated places. He drilled his men and skirmished daily with the Romans, who had overrun a hilltop position and had created a small camp some distance from Caesar's larger main camp. A rallying of about 10,000 disenchanted Aeudan tribesmen (engineered by Vercingetorix's agents) created a threat in Caesar's rear, including a threat to a supply convoy promised by the allied Aeudans, and he diverted four legions to meet this danger.[65] This, however, gave Vercingetorix's forces the chance to concentrate in superior strength against the smaller two-legion force left behind at Gergovia, and desperate fighting ensued. Caesar dealt with the real threat, turned around and by ruthlessly forced marching once again consolidated his forces at the town. A feint using bogus cavalry by the Romans drew off part of the Gallic assault, and the Romans advanced to capture three more enemy outposts on the slope, and proceeded towards the walls of the stronghold. The diverted Gallic forces returned however and in frantic fighting outside the town walls, the Romans lost 700 men, including 46 centurions. Caesar commenced a retreat from the town with the victorious Gallic warriors in pursuit. The Roman commander, however, mobilized his 10th Legion as a blocking force to cover his withdrawal and after some fighting, the tribesmen themselves withdrew back to Gergovia, taking several captured legion standards. The vicious fighting around Gergovia was the first time Caesar had suffered a military reverse, demonstrating the Gallic martial valor noted by the ancient chroniclers. The hard battle is referenced by the Roman historian Plutarch, who writes of the Averni people showing visitors a sword in one of their temples, a weapon that reputedly belonged to Caesar himself. According to Plutarch, the Roman general was shown the sword in the temple at Gergovia some years after the battle, but he refused to reclaim it, saying that it was consecrated, and to leave it where it was.[66] The Gallic were unable to sustain their strategy, however, and Vercingetorix was to become trapped in Alesia, facing not divided sections or detachments of the Roman Army but Caesar's full force of approximately 70,000 men (50,000 legionnaires plus numerous additional auxiliary cavalry and infantry). This massive concentration of Romans was able to besiege the fortress in detail and repulse Gallic relief forces, and it fell in little more than a month.[66] Vercingetorix overall persisting logistics policy, however, demonstrates a significant level of strategic thinking. As historian A. Goldsworthy (2006) notes: "His [Vercingetorix's] strategy was considerably more sophisticated than that employed by Caesar's earlier opponents.."[67] At Alesia this mobile approach became overly static. The Gauls gave battle at a place where they were inadequately provisioned for an extended siege, and where Caesar could bring his entire field force to bear on a single point without them being dissipated, and where his lines of supply were not effectively interdicted.[68] At Gergovia by contrast, Caesar's strength was divided by the appearance of another Gallic force in his rear (the Aeudans)- threatening his sources and lines of supply. Together with a strong defensive anvil, (the town) supported by an offensive hammer (the open field forces), and coupled with previous resource denial pressure over time, the Romans were forced to retreat, and the Gallic secured a victory. As one historian notes about the persisting strategy: "But before the defeat at Alesia, Vercingetorix's strategy had driven Cesar from central Gaul.. In finding and overwhelming Roman foragers as Fabius had done to Hannibal's men, the Gauls concentrated against weakness to win many small victories. Their strength in cavalry helped them concentrate rapidly, facilitating the application of the combat element in their strategy, though attacking foragers and grain gatherers were also intrinsic to the logistic aspect of their campaign."[69] Roman infantry versus mobile and guerilla warfare in Hispania[edit] The Iberian zone of struggle. The Gallic-Celtic-Iberian peoples, like many other tribes, descended from the general "Celtic" race, put up an obstinate fight against Roman hegemony. Based in Hispania (what is now Spain and Portugal), they fought continuously, with varying levels of intensity, for almost two centuries, beginning around 218 BC. The initial hegemons of Hispania were the Carthaginians who struggled against various tribes to carve out colonies and a commercial empire, primarily in coastal enclaves. Carthaginian defeats by Rome brought struggle against a new imperium. Tribes such as the Celtiberi carried out a strong resistance, a struggle later continued by other groups such as the Lusitani, under Viriathus. The Lusitanian War and the Numantine War are but a few examples of the prolonged conflict, which cut across 20 decades of Roman history. Full conquest was not achieved until the time of Augustus. The vicious long-term fighting made Hispania a place of dread for the Roman soldier. Historian Sir Edward Creasy, in his "The Fifteen Decisive Battles of the World" had this to say about the Iberian conflicts.[70] "The war against the Spaniards, who, of all the nations subdued by the Romans, defended their liberty with the greatest obstinacy... the Romans in both provinces were so often beaten, that nothing was more dreaded by the soldiers at home than to be sent there... Roman tactics. Rome deployed its standard methods, with greater emphasis on blended units of light troops, cavalry and heavy infantry when confronting the guerrilla or mobile tactics used by the Iberians. Roman fortified camps were also valuable in protecting the troops and providing bases of operation. While combat results were mixed in the open field, the Romans did comparatively well when besieging Iberian cities, systematically eliminating enemy leaders, supply bases and centres of resistance. Destruction of Iberian resources by burning grain fields or demolishing villages also put the native resistance under greater pressure. The operations of Scipio during the Numantine War illustrate these methods, including a crackdown on lax practices and tightening of legionary discipline.[71] Other Roman tactics touched on the political sphere such as the "pacification" treaties of Gracchus, and treachery and trickery, as in the massacres of tribal leaders by Lucullus and Galba under guise of negotiation. Rome frequently capitalized on divisions among the tribes. A "divide and conquer" policy was in use, with competing (and sometimes insincere) treaties being negotiated to isolate targeted groups, and allied tribes being used to subdue others.[72] Celtic-Iberian tactics. Fighting for their independence and survival, the Iberian tribes used fortified cities or strongpoints to defend against their enemies and mixed this with mobile warfare in formations ranging from small guerrilla bands to large units numbering thousands of men. The Celtic/Iberian horsemen, in particular, appear to be more than a match for those of Rome, a fact proved in earlier years by the key role such allied cavalry played in Hannibal's victories. Favourable mobility and knowledge of the local terrain were to help the tribes immensely. One of the most successful ambushes was pulled off by a chieftain named Carus, who liquidated around 6,000 Romans in a combined cavalry-infantry strike. Another was executed by Caesarus, who took advantage of a disorderly Roman pursuit under Mummius, to lay a trap that resulted in Roman losses of around 9,000 men. A similar Iberian "turn and fight" gambit is also recorded as being successful against Galba. Roman arms however triumphed over two grinding centuries of conflict. See "Appian's History of Rome: The Spanish Wars" for a more detailed discussion of individual battles, leaders and engagements.[71] Victory through attrition[edit] In their battles against a wide variety of opponents, Rome's ruthless persistence, greater resources and stronger organization wore down their opponents over time.[73] Rome's massive manpower supply was the foundation of this approach. Opponents could be relentlessly weakened and exhausted over the long run.[74] In Spain, resources were thrown at the problem until it yielded over 150 years later—a slow, harsh grind of endless marching, constant sieges and fighting, broken treaties, burning villages and enslaved captives. As long as the Roman Senate and its successors were willing to replace and expend more men and material decade after decade, victory could be bought through a strategy of exhaustion.[75] The systematic wastage and destruction of enemy economic and human resources were called vastatio by the Romans. Crops and animals were destroyed or carried off, and local populaces were massacred or enslaved. Sometimes these tactics were also used to conduct punitive raids on barbarian tribes which had performed raids across the border. In the campaigns of Germanicus, Roman troops in the combat area carried out a "scorched earth" approach against their Germanic foes, devastating the land they depended on for supplies. "The country was wasted by fire and sword fifty miles round, nor sex nor age found mercy; places sacred and profane had the equal lot of destruction, all razed to the ground.." (Tacitus, Annals). The Roman "grind down" approach is also seen in the Bar Kokba Jewish revolt against the Romans. The Roman commander Severus avoided meeting the hard-fighting Jewish rebels in the open field. Instead, he relied on attacking their fortified strongpoints and devastating the zone of conflict in a methodical campaign.[76] This "attritional" aspect of the Roman approach to combat contrasts with the notion of brilliant generalship or tactics sometimes seen in popular depictions of the Roman infantry. Some historians note however that Rome often balanced brutal attrition with shrewd diplomacy, as demonstrated by Caesar's harsh treatment of Gallic tribes that opposed him, but his sometimes conciliatory handling of those that submitted. Rome also used a variety of incentives to encourage cooperation by the elites of conquered peoples, co-opting opposition and incorporating them into the structure of the empire. This carrot and stick approach forms an integral part of "the Roman way" of war.[77] Resource tactics[edit] As with any military organization, training soldiers/armies requires a number of things and could prove to be quite costly in the long run. The Romans understood this concept very well and realized that training soldiers could include paying for his rations [food], his salary, his armour, his armaments [weapons], and a soldier's honorarium [which was paid to those who received honourable discharges]. With all this in perspective, they realized each individual soldier was a far too valuable resource to waste. They knew the costs they were incurring for each soldier had to be quite similar on their enemy's side. So they developed a tactic that could cause a significant setback or even defeat for their enemy while only creating a limited risk for their own soldiers. This was known as “Resource Tactics.” Standing armies run on their stomachs and their equipment, and both require regular supplies. "Resource Tactics" cut off their opponents from resources in one of three ways: Attack resource locations: Once they conquered territory, the Romans would secure as many resources as they could handle. This allowed them to restock their own supply and prevent the available resources from falling into their opponents' hands.[78] Intercept supplies while in transit: The Romans would identify their enemies' main supply routes and create a stopping point. Once the enemy was stopped, the Romans would ransack the supply, which would drastically reduce the supplies reaching the enemy.[78] Conduct a “siege” [siege - a military operation in which troops surround a place and cut off all outside access to force surrender]: The Romans would typically build a wall around the existing city to help control the enemy. This wall would be built out of reach of the archers and would prevent the enemy from escaping. Once the Romans completed the wall, they would use catapults, ballistas and onagers to hurl rocks, spears, and other objects from safe distances. The ongoing siege would eventually cause the city/fort to run out of resources, thus causing the opponents to die off or surrender.[78] The basic principle behind these tactics was to disrupt their enemies' resources while increasing Roman resources. Without a regular supply of food, water, and other commodities, armies would begin to starve or dehydrate, resulting in low morale or killing of fellow soldiers.[78] Roman infantry versus cavalry[edit] Tactical problems of fighting cavalry[edit] Cavalry opponents were one of the toughest challenges faced by the Roman infantry. Combining both missile and shock capability with extensive mobility, cavalry exploited the inherent weakness of the legion—its relatively slow movement and deployment. Defeat by strong cavalry forces is a recurring event in Roman military history. The campaigns of Hannibal illustrate this well, as Numidian and Spanish/Gallic horsemen repeatedly outflanked Roman formations, dealing devastating blows in the sides and rear. Hannibal's great victory at Cannae (considered one of the greatest Roman defeats ever) was primarily an infantry struggle, but the key role was played by his cavalry, as in his other victories. An even more dramatic demonstration of Roman vulnerability is shown in the numerous wars against Parthian heavy cavalry. The Parthians and their successors used large numbers of fast-moving light riders to harass and skirmish, and delivered the coup de grâce with heavily armoured lancers called "cataphracts". Both types of troops used powerful composite bows that shot arrows of sufficient strength to penetrate Roman armour. The cataphracts extended combat power by serving as shock troops, engaging opposing forces with their heavy lances in thundering charges after they had been "softened up" by swarms of arrows. The Parthians also conducted a "scorched earth" policy against the Romans, refusing major set-piece encounters, while luring them deeper on to the unfavorable ground, where they would lack water supplies and a secure line of retreat. The debacle of the Battle of Carrhae saw a devastating defeat of Roman arms by the Parthian cavalry.[79] Crassus' force was systematically dismembered by the smaller Parthians army, who surprised Roman expectations that they would run out of arrows, by arranging for a supply train of ammunition borne by thousands of camels. Roman casualties were approximately 20,000 killed and 10,000 captured making the battle one of the costliest defeats in Roman history. Parthian casualties were minimal.[80] Successful tactics[edit] Clues exist in the earlier campaigns of Alexander the Great against mounted Asiatic warriors—engaging the horsemen with strong detachments of light infantry and missile troops and driving them off with charges by Alexander's heavy cavalry units. The Roman variant, with its large manpower resources, continued the same "combined arms" approach, with a larger role for cavalry as the empire went on. The Eastern half of the Roman Empire, particularly, was ultimately to rely mostly on cavalry forces. Adjustments of Ventidius. The operations of the Roman commander Publius Ventidius Bassus illustrate three general tactics used by the infantry to fight their mounted foes. These drew on Caesar's veteran legions and made Ventidius one of the Roman generals to celebrate a triumph against the Parthians. In three separate battles, he not only managed to defeat the Parthian armies and drive them out of the Roman territory but also managed to kill Parthia's three top military commanders during the battles.[81] The adjustments of Ventidius were as follows:[81] Increase in firepower. Ventidius sought to neutralize the Parthian advantage in firepower, by adding his own, and provided his legions with numerous slingers whose furious fire was instrumental in checking the Parthian horsemen during several battles. In subsequent engagements, other Roman commanders increased cavalry units and slingers, with the latter being supplied with leaden bullets which gave more range and killing power.[81] Securing the high ground and other terrain features. During movement against the horsemen, special care had to be taken when crossing a mountain, ravine or bridge. In such cases, sub-sections of the legion had to be redeployed to provide covering and blocking forces until the army had safely navigated the route.[82] In his three victories over the horsemen, Ventidius had his infantry secure the high ground, bolstering defensive positions and manoeuvres with withering covering fire by the slingers. Seizure of hilly terrain features hindered sweeping enemy cavalry movements, obstructed avenues of attack and provided anchor points that allowed manoeuvring detachments to counterattack, or to fall back if unfavourable conditions developed. Against the horsemen, heavy infantry units had to work closely with cavalry and light troops, and be mutually supporting, or they could be quickly isolated and destroyed.[81] Quick counterattack from a stable base. Once entering the zone of battle, Ventidius generally operated from a defensive base and did not prematurely venture on to flat terrain or allow his forces to lose cohesion as at Carrhae. He let the Parthian forces come to him after taking a strong position, and aggressively and quickly counterattacked. In two victories the Parthians were induced to attack the army camp, where they were mauled by the corps of slingers. The legions then counterattacked from this defensive anvil, light and heavy units working together to smash opposition.[83] In one victory, Ventidius took a position on the high ground, and then dispatched a strong vanguard of cavalry against a Parthian concentration at the Syrian Gates, or narrow pass over Mount Amanus, leading from Cilicia into Syria. This vanguard was a decoy to lure the opposition forward. As the Parthians moved in for the kill, the Romans ambushed them from the flank with a detachment of slingers and infantry. Rather than wait for reinforcements by the allied force of Labenieus in the area, the Parthians decided to mount a full-scale attach on the main Roman position at dawn. Ventidius held back his forces until most of the Parthians were on the steep slope, then made a fast counterattack - his infantry covered by the slingers. The Parthians were defeated in detail and Pharnapates the Parthian commander was killed.[83] In his third triumph, Ventidius again secured the high ground, the pivot of his tactics, and did not oppose a Parthian crossing of the Euphrates. He held back his forces and let the Parthians advance to his position until they were close, then ordered a rapid counterattack- the slingers blanketing the enemy with fire, and the infantry surging forward. This quick "combined arms counter-punch" caught the Parthians on unfavorable terrain under a furious hail of slingstones and leaden pellets, and prevented them from destroying the legions with arrow barrages from a distance. Forced to fight at close quarters with the quickly advancing legionaries, the Parthians faltered and their leader Pacorus and his body guard were killed. The rest of their army eventually broke and retreated.[84] Combined arms and quick advance in later eras. In the later Roman empire, cavalry forces played a larger role, with the infantry in support. The campaign of the Emperor Julian II against the Persians is instructive in this regard. On June 22, 363 a large-scale clash occurred near the town of Maranga. Facing an enemy that threatened to blanket his troops with a hail of arrows, and in danger of envelopment, Julian deployed his force in a crescent formation, and ordered an advance by both infantry and cavalry on the double, thwarting both dangers by closing quickly. The gambit was successful. After a long battle, the Persians withdrew- a tactical victory (albeit a costly one for the Romans according to some historians).[85] The work of Roman historian Ammianus Marcellinus offers a detailed description of the Persian campaign, including the quick charge by the heavy Roman infantry under Julian. "To prevent the preliminary volleys of the archers from disrupting our ranks he (Julian) advanced at the double and so ruined the effect of their fire... Roman foot in close order made a mighty push and drove the serried ranks of the enemy before them..." Marcellinus's commentary also sharply contrasts the fighting spirit of the Persian infantrymen with those of Rome, stating that they had "aversion to pitched infantry battles."[86] In an earlier engagement outside the walls of Ctesiphon, Marcellinus again notes the value of the quick advance by the infantry: "both sides fought hand-to-hand with spears and drawn swords; the quicker our men forced themselves into the enemy's line the less they were exposed to danger from arrows."[87] Mixed results against major cavalry enemies. Rome's overall record against the Parthians was favourable, although the Parthian horsemen offered stiff resistance, as it was against the horsemen of Hannibal, and some Gallic opponents. Subsequent Roman leaders like Antony invaded Parthian territory but had to withdraw after severe losses. Others like Severus and Trajan saw great success in their invasions of Mesopotamia, defeating Parthian armies through combined arms tactics.[81] Thus, the battles of Ventidius and Julian show that the Roman infantry, when properly handled and manoeuvred, and when working in conjunction with other supporting arms like slingers, could certainly meet the challenge of an enemy cavalryman.[81] Decline[edit] Any history of the Roman infantry must grapple with the factors that led to the decline of the heavy legions that once dominated the Western world. Such decline, of course, is closely linked with the decay of other facets of Rome's economy, society and political scene. Nevertheless, some historians emphasize that the final demise of Rome was due to military defeat, however plausible (or implausible) the plethora of theories advanced by some scholars, ranging from declining tax bases, to class struggle, to mass lead poisoning.[88] Two of the major factors that have occupied scholars of the military will be discussed here: barbarization and the adaptation of a "mobile reserve" strategy. There are a number of controversies in this area with duelling scholars advancing competing theories. "Barbarization" of the heavy infantry[edit] "Barbarization" is a common theme in many works on Rome (See Gibbon, Mommsen, Delbrück, et al.), and thus cannot be excluded from any analysis of its infantry forces. Essentially it is argued that the increasing barbarization of the heavy legions weakened weaponry, training, morale and military effectiveness in the long run. The weapons changes described above are but one example.[89] It could be argued that the use of barbarian personnel was nothing new. This is accurate, however, such use was clearly governed by "the Roman way." It was the barbarian personnel who had to adapt to Roman standards and organization, not the other way around. In the twilight of the empire, this was not the case. Such practices as permitting the settlement of massive, armed barbarian populations on Roman territory, the watering down of the privilege of citizenship, increasing use of alien contingents, and relaxation or removal of traditionally thorough and severe Roman discipline, organization and control, contributed to the decline of the heavy infantry.[90] The settlement of the foederati for example, saw large barbarian contingents ushered on to Roman territory, with their own organization, under their own leaders. Such groupings showed a tendency to neglect "the Roman way" in organization, training, logistics etc., in favour of their own ideas, practices and agendas. These settlements may have bought short-term political peace for imperial elites, but their long-term effect was negative, weakening the traditional strengths of the heavy infantry in discipline, training and deployment. They also seemed to have lessened the incentive for remaining "old Guard" troops to adhere to such strengths, since the barbarians received equal or more favour with less effort. Indeed, such "allied" barbarian contingents were at times to turn on the Romans, devastating wide areas with sack and pillage and even attacking imperial army formations.[91] Other writers argue that while some ancient Romans did view the world in terms of barbarians versus civilized Romans (epitomized in Hadrian's Wall of separation), the reality of Roman frontiers was a fuzzy set of interlocking zones - political, military, judicial and financial, rather than a neat linear boundary. Changes to the Roman forces that moved away from the old fighting organization order were thus the outcome of several influences, rather than simply the appearance of more, allegedly uncivilized non-Romans.[92] Changes in the legions[edit] To combat the more frequent raids and advances of their hostile neighbours the legions were changed from slow and heavy to much lighter troops, and cavalry was introduced as a serious concept. State-controlled factories produced vast quantities of less specialist arms such as chainmail armour and spears as opposed to the gladius and lorica segmentata more prevalent in the early empire. The difference between auxiliaries and legionaries began to become negligible from an equipment point of view. This meant that the new subdivided infantry lost the awesome power that the earlier legions had, meaning that whilst they were more likely to see a battle they were less likely to win it. That legion size was at an all-time low was also a factor. On the other hand, legions in the late empire were used far more flexibly as accounts by authors like Ammianus Marcellinus make clear. Smaller detachments waged more personal and smaller scale, yet intense operations against tribal foes on the Rhine and Danubian frontiers. Instead of vast formations of thousands of troops, smaller units would engage smaller-scale incursions by raiders. Roman horsemen, while fast, were actually much too weak to cope with the very cavalry based invasions of the Huns, Goths, Vandals and Sassanids. Their ineffectiveness was demonstrated at Cannae and Adrianople; in both instances, the cavalry was completely destroyed by a vastly more powerful enemy horse. Advances in Roman tactical thinking led to the adoption of eastern-style cataphracts and mass-use of auxiliary forces as cavalry, both of which were used to address previous shortcomings of the Roman army. The later Roman army was more cavalry-orientated than it had been before and as a result, detachments were able to be moved around the empire at will, ending the previous doctrine of keeping all forces on the frontiers at the edge of the empire. The mobile forces approach[edit] The "mobile reserve" strategy, traditionally identified with Constantine I, saw a reversal of the traditional "forward" policy of strong frontier fortifications backed by legions stationed near likely zones of conflict. Instead, it is argued that the best troops were pulled back into a type of "mobile reserve" closer to the centre that could be deployed to trouble areas throughout the empire. Some scholars claim this was a positive development, (Luttwak, Delbruck, et al.) given growing difficulties with governing the vast empire, where political turmoil and severe financial difficulties had made the old preclusive security system untenable. Some writers such as Luttwak condemn the old-style "forward" policy as indicating a "Maginot Line" mentality in the troubled latter centuries of the Empire.[93] Disadvantages of the mobile reserve strategy versus the "forward" policy Ancient writers like Zosimus in the 5th century AD condemned the "reserve" policy as a major weakening of the military force. Other modern scholars (Ferrill et al.) also see the pullback as a strategic mistake, arguing that it left lower quality "second string" limitanei forces to stop an enemy until the distant mobile reserve arrived. While the drop in quality did not happen immediately, it is argued that over time, the limitanei declined into lightly armed, static watchman type troops that were of dubious value against increasing barbarian marauders on the frontiers. The pullback of the best infantry was based more on political reasons (shoring up the power bases of the emperors and various elites) rather than on military reality. In addition, it is claimed, the "forward" policy was not at all a static "Maginot" approach, but that traditional heavy legions and supporting cavalry could still move to a trouble spot by redeploying them from fortifications elsewhere along a particular frontier. Some scholars challenge the notion that a "mobile reserve" in the modern military sense existed in the Roman Empire, and instead argue that the shifts in an organization represent a series of field armies deployed in various areas as needed, particularly in the East. Others point to the heavy fiscal difficulties and political turmoil of the later Empire that made it difficult to continue a traditional policy.[94] Twilight of the hard-core infantry[edit] There are numerous other facets to the controversy, but whatever the school of thought, all agree that the traditional strengths and weaponry of the heavy infantry legion declined from the standards of earlier eras. The 4th-century writer Vegetius, in one of the most influential Western military works De Re Militari, highlighted this decline as the key factor in military weakness, noting that the core legions always fought as part of an integrated team of cavalry and light foot. In the latter years, this formula that had brought so much success petered out. Caught between the growth of lighter armed/less organized foot soldiers, and the increasing cavalry formations of the mobile forces, the "heavies" as the dominant force, withered on the vine. This does not mean that heavy units disappeared entirely, but that their mass recruitment, formation, organization and deployment as the dominant part of the Roman military was greatly reduced. Ironically, in Rome's final battles (the Western half of the empire) the defeats suffered were substantially inflicted by infantry forces (many fighting dismounted).[94] Speaking of the decline of the heavy infantry, the Roman historian Vegetius lauded the old fighting units, and lamented how the heavy armour of the early days had been discarded by the weaker, less disciplined, barbarized forces: "Those who find the old arms so burdensome, must either receive wounds upon their naked bodies and die, or what is worse still, run the risk of being made prisoners, or of betraying the country by their flight. Thus, to avoid fatigue, they allow themselves to be butchered shamefully, like cattle."[95] Historian Arther Ferrill notes that even towards the end, some of the old infantry formations were still in use. Such grouping was increasingly ineffective, however, without the severe close order discipline, drill and organization of old times.[94] At the Battle of Châlons (circa 451 AD) Attila the Hun rallied his troops by mocking the once-vaunted Roman infantry, alleging that they merely huddled under a screen of protective shields in close formation. He ordered his troops to ignore them and to attack the powerful Alans and Visigoths instead. It was a sad commentary on the force that had once dominated Europe, the Mediterranean and much of the Middle East. It is true that at Châlons, the Roman infantry contributed to the victory by seizing part of the battlefield's high ground. Nevertheless, its day had already passed in favour of the mass levies of the barbarian federates.[51] Assessment of the Roman infantry[edit] Central factors in Roman success[edit] Some elements that made the Romans an effective military force, both tactically and at higher levels, were: The Romans were able to copy and adapt the weapons and methods of their opponents more effectively. Some weapons, such as the gladius, were adopted outright by the legionaries. Publius asserts that the pilum was of Samnite origin, and the shield was based on Greek design.[96] In other cases, especially formidable units of enemy forces were invited to serve in the Roman army as auxiliaries after peace was made. In the naval sphere, the Romans followed some of the same methods they used with the infantry, dropping their ineffective designs and copying, adapting and improving on Punic warships, and introducing heavier marine contingents (infantry fighters) on to their ships.[97] Roman organization was more flexible than those of many opponents. Compared to the tightly packed spearmen of the phalanx, the Roman heavy infantry, through their training and discipline, and operating in conjunction with light foot and cavalry, could quickly adopt a number of methods and formations depending on the situation. These range from the Testudo formation during siege warfare, to a hollow square against cavalry attack, to mixed units of heavy foot, horse and light infantry against guerrillas in Spain, to the classic "triple line" or checkerboard patterns. Against more sophisticated opponents the Romans also showed great flexibility at times, such as the brilliant adjustments Scipio made against Hannibal at Zama. These included leaving huge gaps in the ranks to trap the charging elephants, and the recall, reposition and consolidation of a single battle line that advanced to the final death struggle against the Carthaginian veterans of Italy.[98] Roman discipline, organization and logistical systemization sustained combat effectiveness over a longer period. Notably, the Roman system of castra, or fortified camps, allowed the army to stay in the field on favourable ground and be rested and resupplied for battle. Well organized Roman logistics also sustained combat power, from routine resupply and storage to the construction of military roads, to state-run arsenals and weapons factories, to well organized naval convoys that helped stave off defeat by Carthage. The death of a leader generally did not cause the legions to lose heart in battle. Others stepped to the fore and carried on. In the defeat by Hannibal at the River Trebia, 10,000 Romans cut their way through the debacle to safety, maintaining unit cohesion when all around was rout, a testimony to their tactical organization and discipline.[97] The Romans were more persistent and more willing to absorb and replace losses over time than their opponents. Unlike other civilizations, the Romans kept going relentlessly until typically their enemies had been completely crushed or neutralized. The army acted to implement policy and were not allowed to stop unless they received a command from the emperor or a decree from the senate. Against the tribal polities of Europe, particularly in Hispania, Roman tenacity and material weight eventually wore down most opposition. The tribes of Europe did not have a state or economic structure able to support lengthy campaigns and therefore could often (but not always) be made to change their minds about opposing Roman hegemony. The defeat in the Teutoburg Forest might seem like an exception, but even here, the Romans were back on the warpath 5 years later with major forces against their Germanic opponents. That their persistence was not actually endless does not negate the general pattern. Where the Romans faced another large state structure, such as the Parthian Empire, they found the military road rocky indeed and were sometimes forced to an impasse. Nevertheless, the distinct pattern of Roman tenacity holds. Rome suffered its greatest defeats against sophisticated Carthage, notably at Cannae, and was forced to avoid a battle for a lengthy period. Yet in time, it rebuilt its forces on land and at sea, and persisted in the struggle, astonishing the Punics who expected it to sue for peace. Against the Parthians, crushing defeats did not stop the Romans from inflicting serious defeats on the Parthians themselves, for they invaded Parthian territory several times afterwards, and though Parthia proper was never totally conquered, Rome ultimately secured a rough hegemony in the area and managed to successfully destroy Parthian forces in Mesopotamia on numerous occasions. Roman leadership was mixed, but over time it was often effective in securing Roman military success. Leadership debacles are common in Roman military history, from the routs against Hannibal to the demise of the unlucky Crassus against the Parthians. The Roman polity's structuring, however, produced a steady supply of men willing and able to lead troops in battle- men that were held accountable for defeat or malfeasance. It was not unusual for a losing general to be prosecuted by political enemies in Rome, with some having their property confiscated and barely escaping death. The senatorial oligarchy, for all its political manoeuvring, interference and other faults, provided the functions of oversight and audit over military matters, that over the course of time, shaped final results. The record is a mixed one, but whether under boisterous Republic or Imperial emperor, Rome produced enough competent leaders to secure its military dominance for over a millennium. Some of the best leaders come from both eras, including Marius, Sulla, Scipio, Caesar, Trajan and others. Note should be taken here of a large number of junior officers the Romans typically used to assure coordination and guidance. The initiative of such men played a key part in Roman success. Effective leadership was also bound up with the famous Roman centurions, the backbone of the legionary organization. While not all such men could be considered models of perfection, they commanded with substantial respect. Rome's massive manpower supply enabled it to stay in the field and continue fighting after defeats and to launch new campaigns. Against Hannibal for example, Rome suffered huge losses, but still vastly outnumbered Hannibal's forces. This meant not only defensive operations under Fabius but the aggressive deployment of new armies under Scipio to take the battle to the Carthaginians in Africa. Other enemies of Rome came up against this massive manpower reserve and faltered over time - from small tribes, city-states or kingdoms fighting to maintain their independence, to major empires that confronted the Romans. The huge pool of fighting men gave the Romans much more room for errors or setbacks, compared to their opponents.[99] The influence of the Roman military and civic culture, as embodied particularly in the heavy infantry legion, gave the Roman military consistent motivation and cohesion. Such culture included but was not limited to: (a) the valuing of Roman citizenship, (b) the broad-based muster of free males into mass infantry units (as opposed to widespread use of foreign contingents, slaves or mercenaries), and (c) loyalty to those fighting units (the Legion) which remained characteristically Roman in outlook and discipline. Citizenship conveyed certain valuable rights in Roman society, and was another element that helped to promote the standardization and integration of the infantry.[100] The citizen under arms - the legion soldier - was supposed to reflect and practice the Roman ideal of virtus, pietas, fides, - self-discipline, respect and faithfulness to engagements. Implementation of such ideals could be mixed according to some writers, but it was "a trilogy [driving] every aspect of military, domestic, economic and social life."[101] As such it was a strong force for cohesion among Rome's infantrymen. See also[edit] Ancient Rome portal War portal Campaign history of the Roman military Castra List of Ancient Rome-related topics Military history of ancient Rome Roman legion Roman military personal equipment Structure of the Roman military References[edit] Citations[edit] ^ John Warry, Warfare in the Ancient World, (St. Martin's, 1980), pp. 70–193 ^ Adrian Goldsworthy, In the Name of Rome: The Men Who Won the Roman Empire, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 2003 pp. 18–117 ^ Lendon, J. E. (2005). Soldiers and Ghosts: A History of Battle in Classical Antiquity. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-11979-4. ^ Crowan, Ross (2007). Roman Battle Tactics 109 BC-AD 313 (PDF). Osprey Publishing. ISBN 978-1-84603-184-7. ^ a b Gabriel, Richard A.; Metz, Karen S. (1991). From Sumer to Rome: The Military Capabilities of Ancient Armies. ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-0-313-27645-3. ^ a b Taylor, Michael J. Visual Evidence for Roman Infantry Tactics. Santa Clara University. ^ Campbell, J. B. (2002). War and society in imperial Rome, 31 BC-AD 284. London: Routledge. ISBN 0-203-21949-X. OCLC 54074542. ^ Esposito, Gabriele (2018-10-30). Armies of the Late Roman Empire AD 284 to 476: History, Organization & Equipment. Casemate Publishers. ISBN 978-1-5267-3038-1. ^ Esposito, Gabriele (2018-10-30). Armies of the Late Roman Empire AD 284 to 476: History, Organization & Equipment. Casemate Publishers. ISBN 978-1-5267-3038-1. ^ Michael Fronda (2010). Between Rome and Carthage: Southern Italy during the Second Punic War. p. 38 ^ Colleen McCullough, (2003) Caesar, p 303-417 ^ Rome at war. (2005) Gilliver et al. Osprey, p 63–97 ^ a b c http://www.roman-empire.net/army/training.html ^ a b http://www.therthdimension.org/AncientRome/Roman_Army/Training/training.htm ^ Adrian Goldsworthy, The Complete Roman Army, Thames & Hudson, 2003, pp. 72–186 ^ a b c d Goldsworthy, The Complete Roman Army, op. cit. ^ Albert Harkness, The Military System of the Romans, University Press of the Pacific, 2004, pp. 53–89 ^ a b c d Adrian Goldsworthy, The Punic Wars, (Cassell 2001) pp. 43–78 ^ Pierre Grimal, The Civilization of Rome, op. cit ^ John Warry, Warfare in the ancient World, (St. Martin's, 1980), pp. 70-183 ^ Williamson, G. A., (tr), Josephus, The Jewish War, Penguin Books, 1959, p. 378-179 ^ a b Adrian Goldsworthy, The Punic Wars, (Cassell 2001) p. 50-69 ^ Warry, Warfare in the Ancient World, op. cit ^ Taylor, Michael J. (2014). "Roman Infantry Tactics in the Mid-Republic: A Reevaluation". Historia 63, 301–322. ^ See Polybius, The Histories for original commentary, The Histories or The Rise of the Roman Empire by Polybius: ** At Perseus Project: English & Greek version ^ a b Goldsworthy, The Punic Wars, op. cit ^ Wake, T., "The Roman Army After Marius' Reforms", 28 February 2006. ^ Harkness, The Roman Military System, op. cit ^ Pierre Brimal, The Civilization of Rome, Simon and Schuster: 1963, Chap 5: The Conquerors, pg 162–196 ^ Warry, op. cit. ^ Adrian Goldsworthy, The Roman Army at War, 100 BC- AD200, (Oxford, 1996), pp. 179-80 ^ a b c d Goldsworthy, The Punic Wars, op. cit. ^ Goldsworthy, 1996, pp. 138-40 ^ Lt. Col. S.G. Brady, The Military Affairs of Ancient Rome and Roman Art of War in Caesar's Time, The Military Service Publishing Company: 1947- url: http://www.digitalattic.org/home/war/romanarmy/ ^ Nardo, The Roman Army, pp. 23–29 ^ Brady, op. cit, See also Warry, pg 169-170 ^ John Warry, Warfare in the Ancient World, p. 169-170 ^ Goldsworthy, The Punic Wars, pp.53–62 ^ Lt. Col. S.G. Brady, The Military Affairs of Ancient Rome and Roman Art of War in Caesar's Time, The Military Service Publishing Company: 1947– url: http://www.digitalattic.org/home/war/romanarmy/ ^ a b Warry, pp. 159–172 ^ Warry, pp. 115–169 ^ a b Polybius, Histories pp. 511-12 ^ John Warry, Warfare in the Ancient World, (St. Martin's, 1980), pp. 70-86 ^ Goldsworthy, The Punic Wars ^ a b Hans Delbrück, Warfare in Antiquity ^ Don Nardo, The Roman Army: Instrument of Power, Lucent Books: 2004, 22-23 ^ The opening scene of the 2000 US movie Gladiator, showing Germanic barbarians being vanquished, was shown to senior American officers before the 2003 US attack on Iraq as a motivational tool- reported in Michael R. Gordon and Bernard E. Trainor, Cobra II: The Inside Story of the Invasion and Occupation of Iraq, (Pantheon Books, 2006) p. 164 ^ Don Nardo, The Roman Army: pp. 22-23 ^ Nardo, op. cit ^ Nardo, The Roman Army, pp. 23-30 ^ a b Arther Ferrill, The Fall of the Roman Empire: The Military Explanation ^ a b Hans Delbrück, History of the Art of War, Vols. I & II. University of Nebraska Press (1990) [1920-21]. ^ Encyclopædia Britannica, Macropedia, 1974 ed, "Germans, Ancient" ^ Nardo, pg 74 ^ a b Nardo, pg. 90 ^ Tacitus, Annals - Book II - "War with the Germans", THE REIGN OF TIBERIUS, OUT OF THE FIRST SIX ANNALS OF TACITUS; WITH HIS ACCOUNT OF GERMANY, AND LIFE OF AGRICOLA, TRANSLATED BY THOMAS GORDON, 1917. url: https://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/etext05/7rtib10.txt ^ Hans Delbrück, History of the Art of War, (Vol. I, p. 510), University of Nebraska Press (1990) [1920-21]. ^ DENISON, GEORGE T. A History of Cavalry. From the earliest times, with Lessons for the Future. London Macmillan and Co. 1877, 1913, pp 62-89 (In public domain- see Google Books ^ Gaius Julius Caesar, Commentaries on the Gallic War, translated by W.A. McDevitte and W.S. Bohn. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1869. url: http://www.forumromanum.org/literature/caesar/gallic_e4.html#32 ^ Chariots: Warfare with Attitude ^ Caesar's Commentaries (THE WAR IN GAUL - THE CIVIL WAR) English translation by W. A. MACDEVITT, introduction by THOMAS DE QUINCEY (1915) -- At Gutenberg Project ^ Theodore Dodge. 1892. Cæsar: a history of the art of war among the Romans Down to the End of the Roman Empire. 2 vol. Houghton-Mifflin ^ Archer Jones. 2001. The art of war in the Western world. University of Illinois Press. pp. 68-89 ^ Jones, art of war..68-89 ^ Stephen Dando-Collins (2002). Caesar's legion: the epic saga of Julius Caesar's elite tenth legion. Wiley. pp. 50–69 ^ a b Dando-Collins. Caesar's legions. 52-68 ^ Adrian Goldsworthy. Caesar: Life of a Colossus. Yale University Press, 2006, pp. 3291-359 ^ Stephen Dando-Collins (2002). Caesar's legion: the epic saga of Julius Caesar's elite tenth legion. Wiley. pp. 50-69 ^ Dando-Collins. Caesar's legions. 52–68 ^ The Fifteen Decisive Battles Of The World: From Marathon To Waterloo by Sir Edward Creasy, M.A., 1851 ^ a b History of Rome: The Spanish Wars, by Appian, circa 165 A.D. ^ Appian, op. cit. ^ John Warry, Warfare in the classical world, University of Oklahoma Press ^ Fronda, 2010. Between Rome and Carthage.. p38 ^ Robert Asprey, War in the Shadows: The Guerrilla in History, Vol 1, Doubleday, 1975, p 21-30 ^ Richard Gottheil, Samuel Krauss, "Bar-Kokba and The Bar-Kokba War", The Jewish Encyclopedia, 2002, See also Hist. Rom. lxix. ch. 12-14 of Dio Cassius for details on the massive Jewish Revolt. ^ Archer Jones, The Art of War in the Western World, University of Illinois Press: 1987, pp. 34-92, 267-381 ^ a b c d http://romanmilitary.net/strategy/resource ^ Denison, History of Cavalry, op. cit ^ Plutarch. Life of Crassus, 31.7. ^ a b c d e f Denison, op. cit ^ Xenophon, Anabasis, Loeb's Classical Library, 1998). See this classic work for a detailed discussion of anti-cavalry problems by another heavy infantry formation- the Hellenic phalanx, including the weaknesses of the hollow square formation ^ a b A history of Persia, Volume 1. 1915. By Sir Percy Molesworth Sykes. pg 385-386 ^ Rose Mary Sheldon -2010. Rome's War in Parthia_ Blood in the Sand-Vallentine Mitchell p 60 ^ Arther Ferrill, The Fall of the Roman Empire: The Military Explanation, (Thames & Hudson, 1986) p. 114-157 ^ Marcellinus, Ammianus, The Later Roman Empire, translated by Hamilton, W. (Penguin, 1987). See also Chris Cornuelle, An Overview of the Sassanian Persian Military, (n.d.) retrieved from May 2008 from Iran Chamber Society http://www.iranchamber.com/history/articles/overview_sassanian_persian_military2.php ^ Marcellinus, op. cit. ^ Arther Ferrill, The Fall of the Roman Empire, pp. 43-190 ^ Arther Ferrill, The Fall of the Roman Empire: The Military Explanation, op. cit. ^ Ferrill, Fall of the Roman Empire 43-190 ^ Ferrill, Fall of the Roman Empire.. 43-190 ^ Hugh Elton, 2012, Frontiers of the Roman Empire, pg 36-131 ^ Edward Luttwak, Grand Strategy of the Roman Empire, (The Johns Hopkins University Press 1979) ^ a b c Ferrill, op. cit ^ Quoted in Denison, p. 92 ^ Grimal, op. cit ^ a b Goldsworthy, The Punic Wars, 98-162 ^ Goldsworthy, op. cit ^ Michael Fronda (2010) Between Rome and Carthage.. p. 38 ^ Grimal, The Civilization of Rome, p. 98-102 ^ Grimal, p. 104 Sources[edit] Primary sources Caesar's Commentarii de Bello Gallico Vegetius's De Re Militari Notitia Dignitatum Secondary sources 'Later Roman Battle Tactics' in C. Koepfer, F.W. Himmler and J. Löffl (eds), Die römische Armee im Experiment (Region im Umbruch, Band 6). Frank & Timme, Berlin 2011, 267–286. — An essay on Roman infantry and cavalry tactics from AD 194 to 378. Ross Cowan, Roman Battle Tactics, 109 BC - AD 313. Osprey, Oxford 2007. — The book clearly explains and illustrates the mechanics of how Roman commanders — at every level — drew up and committed their different types of troops for open-field battles. Adrian Goldsworthy (2001), The Punic Wars, Cassell — A detailed breakdown of Roman strategy, methods, tactics and those of their opponents. Analyzes strengths and weaknesses of the Roman military and how they were able to beat a sophisticated Carthage Arther Ferrill (1986), The Fall of the Roman Empire: The Military Explanation, Thames & Hudson — Focuses on military issues leading to the fall of Rome as opposed to a plethora of theories such as overpopulation, shrinking tax bases, "class struggle", etc. Reemphasizes the military factors in Rome's final demise. Compares the "mobile reserve" strategy of later decades o the earlier "forward" policy of keeping the heavy fighting legions near likely combat zones. Ferrill also tackles the weakening effect of "barbarization", particularly on the core heavy infantry legions. Many historians have argued […] that the fall of Rome was not primarily a military phenomenon. In fact, it was exactly that. After 410 the emperor in the West could no longer project military power to the frontiers. — The Fall of the Roman Empire: The Military Explanation, p. 164 Adrian Goldsworthy (2003), The Complete Roman Army, Thames & Hudson — One volume history covering the Roman Army, which was the biggest most important part of its military. Goldsworthy covers the early Republican days down to the final Imperial era demise, tracing changes in tactics, equipment, strategy, organization etc. He notes the details of the military system such as training and battlefield tactics, as well as bigger picture strategy, and changes that impacted Roman arms. He assesses what made the Romans effective, and ineffective in each of the various eras. Edward Luttwak (1979), Grand Strategy of the Roman Empire, Thames & Hudson — Prominent advocate of the mobile or central reserve theory. Hans Delbrück (1990), History of the Art of War: Warfare in Antiquity, University of Nebraska — Prominent advocate of the mobile or central reserve theory. ISBN 0-8032-9199-X Xenophon (1988), Anabasis, Loeb Classical Library — See this classic work for a detailed discussion of anti-cavalry problems by another heavy infantry formation- the Hellenic phalanx, including the weaknesses of the hollow square formation. External links[edit] Later Roman Battle Tactics C hanging Formations and Specialists: Aspects of Later Roman Battle Tactics v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Roman_infantry_tactics&oldid=995925334" Categories: Roman tactical formations Military units and formations of ancient Rome Military of ancient Rome Hidden categories: Articles containing Latin-language text Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Languages Català Español Français Italiano Українська Edit links This page was last edited on 23 December 2020, at 16:36 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2390 ---- Book sources - Wikipedia Book sources Jump to navigation Jump to search This page allows users to search for multiple sources for a book given the 10- or 13-digit ISBN number. Spaces and dashes in the ISBN number do not matter. Search for book sourcesISBN: Search Wikimedia page containing links to catalogs of libraries, booksellers, and other book sources For assistance, see Help:ISBN. This page links to catalogs of libraries, booksellers, and other book sources where you will be able to search for the book by its International Standard Book Number (ISBN). If you arrived at this page by clicking an ISBN link in a Wikipedia page, you will find the full range of relevant search links for that specific book by scrolling to the find links below. To search for a different book, type that book's individual ISBN into this ISBN search box. Spaces and dashes in the ISBN do not matter. Also, the number starts after the colon for "ISBN-10:" and "ISBN-13:" numbers.  An ISBN identifies a specific edition of a book. Any given title may therefore have a number of different ISBNs. See xISBN below for finding other editions. An ISBN registration, even one corresponding to a book page on a major book distributor database, is not definite proof that such a book actually exists. A title may have been cancelled or postponed after the ISBN was assigned. Check to see if the book exists or not. The master copy of this page is located at Wikipedia:Book sources. Contents 1 Online text 2 Online databases 3 Subscription eBook databases 4 Libraries 4.1 Worldwide 4.2 Africa 4.2.1 Nigeria 4.2.2 South Africa 4.2.3 Zimbabwe 4.3 Central America and the Caribbean 4.3.1 Barbados 4.3.2 Guatemala 4.3.3 Jamaica 4.3.4 Mexico 4.3.5 Trinidad and Tobago 4.4 Canada 4.4.1 Public libraries 4.4.2 Universities and colleges 4.5 United States 4.5.1 Public libraries by state 4.5.2 Universities and colleges 4.6 South America 4.6.1 Argentina 4.6.2 Brazil 4.6.3 Colombia 4.6.4 Ecuador 4.7 Asia 4.7.1 Bangladesh 4.7.2 China, People's Republic 4.7.3 Hong Kong, S.A.R. of China 4.7.4 India 4.7.5 Indonesia 4.7.6 Iran 4.7.7 Israel 4.7.8 Japan 4.7.9 Korea 4.7.10 Malaysia 4.7.11 Philippines 4.7.11.1 Universities and colleges 4.7.11.2 Other libraries 4.7.12 Singapore 4.7.13 Taiwan, Republic of China 4.7.14 Thailand 4.8 Australasia and Oceania 4.8.1 Australia 4.8.1.1 Public libraries 4.8.1.2 Academic libraries 4.8.2 New Zealand 4.8.2.1 Public libraries 4.8.2.2 Academic libraries 4.9 Europe 4.9.1 Austria 4.9.2 Belgium 4.9.3 Bosnia and Herzegovina 4.9.4 Croatia 4.9.5 Czech Republic 4.9.6 Denmark 4.9.7 Estonia 4.9.8 Finland 4.9.9 France 4.9.10 Germany 4.9.11 Greece 4.9.12 Hungary 4.9.13 Iceland 4.9.14 Ireland 4.9.15 Italy 4.9.16 Luxembourg 4.9.17 Montenegro 4.9.18 Netherlands 4.9.19 Norway 4.9.20 Poland 4.9.21 Portugal 4.9.22 Russia 4.9.23 Serbia 4.9.24 Slovenia 4.9.25 Spain 4.9.26 Sweden 4.9.27 Switzerland 4.9.28 Turkey 4.9.29 United Kingdom 4.9.29.1 Public libraries 4.9.29.2 Universities 5 Bookselling and swapping 5.1 Price comparison sites 5.2 Search many booksellers 5.3 Individual booksellers 5.4 Book-swapping websites 6 Non-English book sources 7 Bibliographical information 8 Find other editions 9 Find on Wikipedia 10 See also Online text Find this book on Google Books Find this book at the Open Library Find this book on Amazon.com (or .au, .br, .ca, .cn, .de, .es, .fr, .in, .it, .jp, .mx, .nl, .uk). Google Books and Amazon.com may be particularly helpful if you want to verify citations in Wikipedia articles, because they often enable you to search an online version of the book for specific words or phrases, or you can browse through the book (although for copyright reasons the entire book is usually not available). Online databases Find this book at Karlsruhe Virtual Catalog, a metasearch engine addressing many of the databases linked here and also some major commercial booksellers. Find this book at WorldCat free online catalog of the world's libraries Find this book at OttoBib.com citation metasearch Find this book at Copyright Clearance Center online rights database Find this book at Goodreads personal library catalog Find this book at LibraryThing personal library catalog Find this book at aNobii personal library catalog Find this book at iDreamBooks book review aggregator Find this book at the Grand Comics Database Find this book at the Internet Speculative Fiction Database Subscription eBook databases Find this book at Alexander Street Press by ProQuest Find this book at eBookCentral by ProQuest Find this book at EBSCO Industries eBooks Find this book at Gale by Cengage Find this book at HathiTrust Find this book at Overdrive by Rakuten Find this book at Project MUSE Find this book at ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Open Find this book at Safari Books Online by O'Reilly Media Find this book at ScienceDirect Libraries Select your region from the map above Worldwide Find this book at your local library through WorldCat Africa Nigeria Find this book on the Ahmadu Bello University Library catalogue Find this book on the University of Ilorin Library catalogue South Africa Find this book on the National Library of South Africa catalogue Find this book on the SEALS Consortium catalogue Find this book on the University of South Africa catalogue Find this book on the University of the Witwatersrand Library catalogue Zimbabwe Find this book on the University of Zimbabwe Library catalogue Central America and the Caribbean Barbados Find this book in the University of the West Indies (Cave Hill campus) Library catalogue Guatemala Find this book in the University of San Carlos of Guatemala Central Library catalogue Jamaica Find this book in the University of the West Indies (Mona campus) Library catalogue Mexico Find this book in the National Autonomous University of Mexico Library System Trinidad and Tobago Find this book in the University of Trinidad and Tobago Library Canada Find this book in the Canadian union catalogue via Library and Archives Canada Find this book in the Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec catalogue Find this book in the NRC Canada Institute for Scientific and Technical Information (CISTI) catalogue (Canada's National Science Library) Public libraries Find this book in the Barrie Public Library catalogue Find this book in the Burnaby Public Library catalogue Find this book in the Calgary Public Library catalogue Find this book in the Edmonton Public Library catalogue Find this book in the Gatineau Public Library catalogue Find this book in the Hamilton Public Library catalogue Find this book in the Halifax Public Library catalogue Find this book in the Kitchener Public Library catalogue Find this book in the London Public Library catalogue Find this book in the Markham Public Library catalogue Find this book in the Mississauga Library System catalogue Find this book in the Moncton Public Library catalogue Find this book in the Montreal Public Libraries Network catalogue Find this book in the New Brunswick Public Library Service catalogue Find this book in the Ottawa Public Library catalogue Find this book in the Saskatchewan Information and Library Services Consortium catalogue Find this book in the Stratford Public Library catalogue Find this book in the Sudbury Public Library catalogue Find this book in the Surrey Public Library catalogue Find this book in the Thunder Bay Public Library catalogue Find this book in the Toronto Public Library catalogue Find this book in the Waterloo Public Library catalogue Find this book in the Winnipeg Public Library catalogue Find this book in the Vancouver Public Library catalogue Find this book in the West Vancouver Memorial Library catalogue Universities and colleges Find this book in the Carleton University catalogue Find this book in the Concordia University Library Find this book in the McGill University library Find this book in the McMaster University catalogue Find this book in the Novanet catalogue for all universities in Nova Scotia Find this book in the Queen's University Library catalogue Find this book in the Ryerson University Library Find this book in the Simon Fraser University Library Find this book in the Sherbrooke University catalogue Find this book in the University of Guelph library catalogue Find this book in the Trinity Western University Library catalogue Find this book in the York University Libraries catalogue Find this book in the University College of the Fraser Valley Library Find this book in the University of Alberta Libraries catalogue Find this book in the University of British Columbia Library catalogue Find this book in the University of Calgary Library Find this book in the University of Manitoba catalogue Find this book in the University of New Brunswick catalogue Find this book in the University of Ottawa catalogue Find this book in the University of Prince Edward Island catalogue Find this book in the University of Saskatchewan catalogue Find this book in the University of Toronto Library Find this book in the University of Western Ontario catalogue Find this book in the University of Windsor Library Catalogue Find this book in the University of Winnipeg Library United States Find this book on the United States Library of Congress catalog Find this book in the National Agricultural Library catalog Find this book in the National Library of Medicine catalog Public libraries by state Alabama Find this book in the Jefferson County Library Cooperative (Jefferson County, Alabama) public libraries catalog California Find this book in the Alameda County, California Public Library catalog Find this book in the California & Nevada LINK+ Inter-library Loan catalog Find this book in the Contra Costa County, California Library catalog Find this book in the MARINet catalog, a shared catalog for all the public libraries in Marin County, California Find this book in the Monterey Public Library catalog (Monterey, California) Find this book in the Mountain View Public Library catalog (Mountain View, California) Find this book in the Oakland Public Library catalog (in California) Find this book in the Pacific Grove Public Library catalog (Pacific Grove, California) Find this book in the Palo Alto City Library catalog (Palo Alto, California) Find this book in the California Peninsula Library System catalog Find this book in the Los Angeles (California) Public Library databases and indexes Find this book in the Sacramento Public Library system catalog Find this book in the San Diego County Library (California) catalog Find this book in the San Diego Public Library catalog Find this book in the San Francisco Public Library (California) catalog Find this book in the San Joaquin Valley Library System, catalog (using the Fresno County, California profile) Find this book in the joint San José Public Library and San José State University (California) Library catalog Find this book in the Santa Clara City Library catalog (Santa Clara, California) Find this book in the Santa Clara County Library catalog (Santa Clara County, California) Find this book in the Solano, Napa and Partners Library Consortium catalog (Solano County, California, Napa County, California) Colorado Find this book in the Boulder Public Library (Colorado) catalog Find this book in the Denver Public Library (Colorado) catalog Find this book in the Jefferson County, Colorado public library catalog Find this book in the Prospector (Colorado and Wyoming public, academic, and special libraries) Delaware Find this book in the Delaware Library Catalog Florida Find this book in the Jacksonville, Florida Public Library catalog Find this book in the Orange County, Florida public library Find this book in the Pinellas Public Library Cooperative catalog, Pinellas County Georgia Find this book in the PINES Statewide Public Library catalog Indiana Find this book in the Indianapolis-Marion County Public Library (Indiana) Find this book in the Tippecanoe County Public Library library catalog Iowa Find this book in the Des Moines, Iowa Public Library catalog Find this book in the Sioux City, Iowa Public Library catalog Kansas Find this book in the Johnson County, Kansas Public Library catalog Kentucky Find this book in the Louisville Free Public Library catalog Massachusetts Find this book in the Boston Public Library (BPL) catalog Find this book in the Cape Libraries Automated Materials Sharing (CLAMS) catalog Find this book in the C/W MARS catalog (Central or Western Massachusetts) Find this book in the Minuteman Library Network (MLN) catalog (in Eastern Massachusetts) Find this book in the Merrimack Valley Library Consortium (MVLC) catalog Find this book in the North of Boston Library Exchange (NOBLE) catalog (in Northeastern Massachusetts) Find this book in the Old Colony Library Network catalog (in the South Shore) Find this book in the Sails Library Network catalog (in Southeastern Massachusetts) Michigan Find this book in the Michigan eLibrary aggregate catalog Minnesota Find this book in the Hennepin County Library (including Minneapolis, Minnesota) catalog Missouri Find this book in the Kansas City, Missouri Public Library Find this book in the St. Louis Public Library system catalog Find this book in the St. Louis County Library system catalog Nebraska Find this book in the Omaha Public Library catalog in Omaha, Nebraska New Jersey Find this book in the Bergen County Cooperative Library System for Bergen, Hudson, Passaic, and Essex counties Find this book in the Hunterdon County Library system, Hunterdon County, New Jersey Find this book in the Monmouth County Library System (New Jersey) Find this book in the Somerset County, New Jersey public library catalog New Mexico Find this book in the Los Alamos County, New Mexico public library catalog New York Find this book in the Brooklyn Public Library catalog Find this book in the Finger Lakes Library System catalog in Central New York Find this book in the Four County Library System catalog (Broome, Chenango, Delaware, and Otsego Counties, including Binghamton) Find this book in the Mid-Hudson Library System (New York) catalog Find this book in the Mohawk Valley and Southern Adirondack Library Systems (New York) catalog (using the Saratoga Springs Public Library profile) Find this book in the Nassau County Library System catalog Find this book in the New York Public Library catalog Find this book in the Suffolk County Library System catalog Find this book in the Tompkins County Public Library catalog in Ithaca, New York North Carolina Find this book in the Forsyth County Public Library catalog Find this book in the Wake County Public Library catalog Ohio Find this book in the Cleveland Public Library catalog Find this book in the Cuyahoga County Public Library catalog Find this book in the Dayton Metro Library catalog Find this book in the Toledo-Lucas County Public Library catalog Oklahoma Find this book in the Tulsa City-County Library catalog Oregon Find this book in the Eugene, Oregon Public Library catalog Find this book in the Multnomah County, Oregon Library catalog Find this book in the WCCLS in Washington County, Oregon Pennsylvania Find this book in the Pennsylvania library system Find this book in the Carnegie Library of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania Rhode Island Find this book in the Rhode Island Ocean State Libraries Catalog South Carolina Find this book in the Richland County, South Carolina Public Library (Columbia, South Carolina) system catalog South Dakota Find this book in the Alexander Mitchell Public Library catalog (Aberdeen, South Dakota) Tennessee Find this book in the Nashville, Tennessee Public Library Catalog Texas Find this book in the Amon Carter Museum of American Art Research Library Catalog (Fort Worth, Texas) Find this book in the Harris County (Texas) Public Library catalog Find this book in the Richardson, Texas, Public Library Find this book in the Round Rock, Texas Public Library Find this book in the San Antonio Public Library (Texas) Utah Find this book in the Salt Lake City Public Library system Find this book in the Weber County Library System, Weber County, Utah Washington state Find this book in the Fort Vancouver Regional Libraries catalog Find this book in the King County Library System Find this book in the Pierce County Library System Find this book in the Seattle Public Library Find this book in the Sno-Isle Libraries catalog Find this book in the Tacoma Public Library Wisconsin Find this book in the Marathon County Public Library (MCPL) Catalog (V-Cat) Find this book in the Milwaukee County Federated Library System catalog (Wisconsin) Find this book in the South Central Library System catalog (south central Wisconsin) Universities and colleges Find this book in the American University/Washington Regional Library Consortium library catalog Find this book in the Arizona State University library catalog Find this book in the Auburn University library catalog Find this book in the Bowdoin College library catalog Find this book in the Bowling Green State University library catalog Find this book in the Brigham Young University library catalog Find this book in the Brown University library catalog Find this book in the Chapman University library catalog Find this book in the Christopher Newport University library Find this book in the Clemson University Libraries Find this book in the College of Southern Nevada library catalog Find this book in the Colorado State University libraries catalog Find this book in the Columbia University libraries catalog Find this book in the Concordia College (Minnesota) library catalog Find this book in the ConnectNY (18 New York State academic libraries) catalog Find this book in the CONSORT Colleges (Denison University, Kenyon College, Ohio Wesleyan University, and College of Wooster) libraries Find this book in the Cooperating Libraries in Consortium CLICnet catalog Find this book in the Cornell University Library catalog Find this book in the Dartmouth College Library catalog Find this book in the Drexel University Library catalog Find this book in the Duke University library catalog (Also see 'Triangle Research Library Network,' below.) Find this book in the George Mason University library catalog Find this book in the Georgia Tech Library catalog Find this book in the Gettysburg College library catalog Find this book in the Grinnell College library catalog Find this book in the Harvard University library system, HOLLIS. Find this book in the Hendrix College library catalog Find this book in the Indiana University library system, IUCAT Find this book in the Kansas State University library catalog Find this book in the Linn-Benton Community College library catalog Find this book in the Le Moyne College library catalog Find this book in the Massachusetts Institute of Technology catalog, Barton Find this book in Missouri's MOBIUS catalog of more than 70 academic, public, and special libraries Find this book in the MnPALS Library Union catalog (a system of 154 university libraries in MN) Find this book in the North Carolina State University Library catalog Find this book in the Oberlin College library catalog Find this book in the OhioLINK Union Catalog of 85 Ohio public and private academic libraries Find this book in the Ohio State University Library catalog Find this book in the Old Dominion University Library catalog Find this book in the Pepperdine University libraries catalog Find this book in the Portland Community College library catalog Find this book in the Princeton University Library Find this book in the Prospector (Colorado and Wyoming public, academic, and special libraries) Find this book in the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute library catalog Find this book in the Helin Library Catalog (Rhode Island Colleges and Universities) Find this book in the Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT) library catalog Find this book in the San Diego State University library catalog Find this book in the San Jose State University library catalog Find this book in the Southern Methodist University library catalog Find this book in the Stanford University library catalog Find this book in the State University of New York library catalog (all SUNY campus libraries) Find this book in the Syracuse University library catalog Find this book in the Temple University library catalog Find this book in the Texas A&M University General Libraries catalog Find this book in the Texas A&M University Medical Sciences Library catalog Find this book on the Triangle Research Library Network (Duke University, North Carolina State University, and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill libraries) Find this book in the University of Arizona library catalog Find this book in the University of Arkansas library catalog Find this book in the University of Arkansas at Little Rock library catalog Find this book in the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences library catalog Find this book in the University of Central Arkansas library catalog Find this book in the University of Colorado at Boulder library catalog Find this book in the University of Chicago library catalog Find this book in the University of Delaware library catalog Find this book in the University of Florida library catalog Find this book in the University of Houston library catalog Find this book in the University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign library catalog Find this book in the University of Iowa library catalog Find this book in the University of Louisville library catalog Find this book in the University of Maine library catalog, URSUS Find this book in the University of Maryland, College Park library catalog Find this book in the University of Miami, Florida library catalog Find this book in the University of Michigan (Ann Arbor and Flint campuses) library catalog, MIRLYN Find this book in the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill library catalog Find this book in the University of Notre Dame library catalog Find this book in the University of Pennsylvania library catalog, Franklin Find this book in the University of Pittsburgh library catalog, PITTCAT Find this book in the University of Texas at Austin library catalog Find this book in the University of Washington library catalog Find this book in the University of Wisconsin-Madison library catalog Find this book in the Vassar College library catalog Find this book in the Washington University in St. Louis library system Find this book in the Weber State University library catalog Find this book in the West Virginia University catalog Find this book in the Williams College library catalog Find this book in the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University library catalog, Addison Find this book in the Yale University library catalog South America Argentina Find this book in the Universidad de San Andrés library Find this book in the Instituto Argentino de Radioastronomía library Brazil Find this book in the National Library of Brazil Find this book in the University of São Paulo library system Find this book in the Universidade Estadual de Campinas library system Find this book in the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul library system Colombia Find this book in the National University of Colombia library Find this book in the University of Los Andes library Find this book in the Pontifical Xavierian University library Ecuador Find this book in the National Library of Ecuador (Biblioteca Nacional Eugenio Espejo) Library catalogue Asia Bangladesh Find this book in the Bangladesh Parliament Library catalogue. Find this book in Independent University, Bangladesh Library catalogue. Find this book in Khulna University of Engineering & Technology Central Library catalogue China, People's Republic Find this book in National Library of China Find this book in Nanjing Library Find this book in Tsinghua University Library Find this book in South China Agricultural University Library Hong Kong, S.A.R. of China Find this book among libraries of universities in Hong Kong on the Hong Kong Academic Library Link Find this book in Hong Kong Public Library Catalogue Find this book in Vocational Training Council libraries India Find this book in British Council Library Find this book in the Delhi Public Library catalogue Find this book on Flipkart Find this book on Infibeam Find this book on Rediff Find this book in the Vikram Sarabhai Library, IIM Ahmedabad catalogue Find this book in the North-Eastern Hill University Library catalogue Indonesia Find this book in the National Library of Indonesia Iran Find this book on National Library and Archives Organization of Iran Find this book on Amirkabir University of Technology Central library Israel Find this book in the MALMAD Israel Union List Japan Find this book on the National Diet Library Find this book on the CiNii Books Find this book on the Webcat Plus Korea Find this book on the National Library of Korea Find this book on the Naver Book Malaysia Find this book on the Asia Pacific University of Technology and Innovation library catalogue Find this book on the HELP University library catalogue Find this book on the UCSI University library catalogue Find this book on the University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus Philippines Find this book in the Philippine eLibrary catalogue (integrated catalogue of the National Library of the Philippines, the Commission on Higher Education, the Department of Agriculture, the Department of Science and Technology and the University of the Philippines) Universities and colleges Find this book in the Ateneo de Manila University Library catalogue Find this book in the De La Salle University catalogue Find this book in the Polytechnic University of the Philippines Library catalogue Find this book in the University of Asia and the Pacific catalogue Find this book in the University of the Philippines Diliman catalogue Find this book in the University of the Philippines Manila catalogue Find this book in the University of San Carlos catalogue Find this book in the University of Santo Tomas Library catalogue Other libraries Find this book in the Filipinas Heritage Library catalogue Find this book in the LibraryLink catalogue Find this book in the Quezon City Public Library catalogue Singapore Find this book on the National University of Singapore library catalogue Taiwan, Republic of China Find this book on the National Bibliographic Information Network catalogue Find this book at Books.com.tw website Thailand Find this book on the Chulalongkorn University library catalogue Australasia and Oceania Australia Find this book on the National Library of Australia catalogue Find this book on the State Library of New South Wales library system catalogue Find this book on the State Library of Victoria library system catalogue Find this book on the State Library of Queensland library system catalogue Find this book on the State Library of South Australia catalogue Find this book on the State Library of Western Australia catalogue (includes local branches) Public libraries Find this book (and library resources in other formats) at your local library through the National Library of Australia's "Trove" service Find this book (and library resources in other formats) at your local library through Libraries Australia (subscribers only) Find this book on the Australian Capital Territory Public Library catalogue Find this book on the Geelong Public Library catalogue Find this book among members of the Northern Territory Libraries Network Find this book on the South Australian Public Libraries catalogue Academic libraries Find this book on the Federation University Australia catalogue Find this book on the Australian National University library system catalogue Find this book on the Central Queensland University library catalogue Find this book on the Charles Sturt University library catalogue Find this book on the Deakin University/Gordon Institute of TAFE library catalogue Find this book on the James Cook University (Qld) library catalogue Find this book on the Monash University library system catalogue Find this book on the Queensland University of Technology library catalogue Find this book on the University of Adelaide catalogue Find this book on the University of Melbourne/Victorian College of the Arts library system catalogue Find this book on the University of Newcastle (NSW) library catalogue Find this book on the University of Queensland library catalogue Find this book on the University of Sydney library catalogue Find this book on the University of Technology, Sydney library catalogue Find this book on the University of Wollongong catalogue Find this book (and other library resources) on the Wesley College, Melbourne (AquaBrowser) library catalogue New Zealand Find this book in the National Library of New Zealand catalogue Find which New Zealand Libraries have this book Public libraries Find this book in the Auckland Libraries catalogue Find this book in the Christchurch Public Libraries catalogue Find this book in the Dunedin Public Libraries catalogue Find this book in the Palmerston North City Public Library catalogue Find this book in the Waimakariri District Libraries catalogue Academic libraries Find this book in the Auckland University of Technology library catalogue Find this book in the Lincoln University library catalogue Find this book in the Massey University library catalogue Find this book in the University of Canterbury and Christchurch College of Education library catalogue Find this book in the University of Waikato library catalogue Europe (see also The European Library) Find this book at the Karlsruher Virtueller Katalog, a European cross-library search engine Austria Find this book on the Graz University of Technology library catalogue Find this book on the Technical University of Vienna library catalogue Find this book on the University of Innsbruck library catalogue Find this book on the University of Salzburg library catalogue Find this book on the University of Vienna library catalogue Belgium Find this book (en) in UniCat Belgica, Union Catalogue of Belgian Libraries Find this book (nl) in Bibliotheek.be, the portal and catalogue of public libraries in Flanders Find this book (fr) in the Université libre de Bruxelles library catalog Find this book (nl) in the Vrije Universiteit Brussel library catalog Bosnia and Herzegovina Find this book at the Bosnian-Herzegovinian Co-operative Online Bibliographic System & Services Croatia Find this book in the Croatian National and University Library catalogue Find this book in the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Library catalogue Czech Republic Find this book in the State Technical Library in Prague Find this book in the Palacký University Library in Olomouc Find this book in the State Technical Library in Prague Find this book in the Masaryk University libraries in Brno Find this book in the Palacký University Library in Olomouc Find this book in the Res­earch Library in Olomouc Denmark Find this book with bibliotek.dk Estonia Find this book on Ester, the catalogue of ELNET Ester libraries Finland (also see Searching catalogues of Finnish libraries) Find this book on HelMet, the Greater Helsinki region library catalogue Find this book on the Helsinki University of Technology library catalogue Find this book on the Helsinki School of Economics library catalogue Find this book in Piki, the catalogue for public libraries in the Pirkanmaa region, e.g. Tampere City Library Find this book on the Tampere University of Technology library catalogue Find this book on the University of Helsinki library catalogue Find this book on the University of Jyväskylä library catalogue Find this book on the University of Tampere library catalogue Find this book on the University of Turku library database Find this book on the Vaasa City Library – Regional Library Find this book and compare prices with Vertaa.fi France Find this book in the Catalogue général de la Bibliothèque nationale de France, the French national library SUDOC, French academic libraries Bu Angers Catalogue de la Bibliothèque universitaire d'Angers Germany Find this book in the DNB – Deutsche Nationalbibliothek, central archival library and national bibliographic centre Find this book in the GVK – Gemeinsamer Verbundkatalog, a joint effort of multiple states in northern and eastern Germany Find this book in the hbz-Verbundkatalog Find this book in the SWB Online-Katalog Find this book in the BVB BibliotheksVerbund Bayern Find this book in the KOBV-Portal Find this book in the HeBIS-Verbundkatalog Greece Find this book in any Greek Academic Library through Zephyr Find this book in the library of National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Hungary Find this book in Libri Könyvkereső Iceland Find this book in Gegnir, the union catalog of Icelandic libraries Ireland Find this book in the Dublin City Council Library Find this book in the Dublin City University (DCU) Library Find this book in the Dublin Institute of Technology Library Find this book in the National University of Ireland, Galway (NUI, Galway) Library Find this book in the Trinity College of Dublin (TCD) Library Find this book in the South Dublin County Council Library Find this book in the University College Cork (UCC) Boole Library Find this book in the University College Dublin (UCD) Library Italy Find this book in the National Library System Catalogue, which searches simultaneously in hundreds of Italian libraries (including national libraries, university libraries, municipal libraries) Find this book in the University of Florence Library Find this book in the University of Pavia Library Find this book in the University of Pisa Library Find this book in the Pontifical University of the Holy Cross Library Find this book in the Polytechnic University of Turin Library Luxembourg Find this book in bibnet.lu, the unified catalogue for libraries in Luxembourg Montenegro Find this book at the Montenegrin Co-operative Online Bibliographic System & Services Netherlands Find this book in the Dutch-Union Catalogue that searches simultaneously in more than 400 Dutch electronic library systems (including regional libraries, university libraries, research libraries and the Royal Dutch library) Find this book in the Koninklijke Bibliotheek (National Library of the Netherlands) Find this book in Leiden University Libraries Find this book in Maastricht University Library Find this book in Radboud University Nijmegen Library Find this book in University of Groningen Library Find this book in Utrecht University Library Norway Find this book in the Norwegian Bibsys system, that comprises all Norwegian university libraries, the National Library, all college libraries, and a number of research libraries Find this book in the Norwegian union catalogue of monographs (Sambok) Find this book in the Stavanger Public Library catalogue Poland Find this book at the National Library in Warsaw Portugal Find this book in the catalog of PORBASE (National Bibliographic Database of Portuguese libraries), or get its record, from the URN.PORBASE.org service, in the MarcXchange format. Both services are managed by the National Library of Portugal and the catalog includes records from public and private libraries in Portugal. Russia Find this book in the catalog of National Electronic Library (НЭБ, Национальная электронная библиотека). Serbia Find this book at the Serbian Co-operative Online Bibliographic System & Services Slovenia Find this book at the Slovenian Co-operative Online Bibliographic System & Services Spain Find this book at the Catalan universities catalogue Find this book at the University of Córdoba library catalogue Find this book at the University of Granada library catalogue Find this book at the University of Leon library catalogue Find this book at the University of Navarra library catalogue Find this book at the University of Salamanca library catalogue Find this book at the University of Seville library catalogue Sweden Find this book in the Swedish Royal Library national catalogue (LIBRIS) Find this book in the Chalmers University of Technology library catalogue Find this book at the Gothenburg Public Library library catalogue Find this book at the Malmö City Library library catalogue Switzerland Find this book in Helveticat, the catalogue of the Swiss National Library Find this book in the Swiss Virtual Catalogue (CHVK) Find this book in the RERO catalogue collectif Find this book in the Nebis catalogue Find this book in the Sistema Bibliotecario Ticinese catalogue Turkey Find this book in the National Catalog Find this book in the Bogazici University Library catalogue Find this book in the Ege University Library catalogue Find this book in the Koc University Library catalogue Find this book in the METU Library catalogue United Kingdom Find this book on the National Library of Wales catalogue Find this book on Library Hub Discover (formerly the Copac union catalogue) (Includes British Library and many universities) Public libraries Find this book on the Birmingham Libraries Online Catalogue Find this book on the Buckinghamshire Libraries Online Catalogue Find this book on the Derbyshire Libraries Online Catalogue Find this book on the Devon Libraries Online Catalogue Find this book on the Kent Libraries Online Catalogue Find this book on the Libraries West catalogue covering libraries in Bristol and the south-west Find this book on the Norfolk Online Library Services catalogue Find this book on the Oxfordshire County Council Library catalogue Universities Find this book on the University College London library catalogue Find this book at the University of Cambridge Find this book on the Cranfield University library catalogue Find this book on the University of Exeter library catalogue Find this book on the University of Dundee library catalogue Find this book on the Durham University library catalogue Find this book on the University of East Anglia library catalogue Find this book on the University of Glasgow library catalogue Find this book on the University of Gloucestershire library catalogue Find this book on Summon at the University of Huddersfield Find this book on the University of Hull library catalogue Find this book on the Imperial College London library catalogue Find this book on the Keele University library catalogue Find this book on the University of Leeds library catalogue Find this book on the University of Liverpool library catalogue Find this book on the University of London, Senate House Libraries library catalogue Find this book on the University of Nottingham library catalogue Find this book on the University of Oxford SOLO catalogue Find this book on the University of Plymouth Voyager catalogue Find this book on the Royal Holloway, University of London library catalogue Find this book on the Sheffield Hallam University library catalogue Find this book on the University of St Andrews library catalogue Find this book on the University of Southampton library catalogue Find this book at the University of Sussex Find this book on the University of Warwick library catalogue Find this book on the University of York library catalogue Bookselling and swapping Price comparison sites Find your book on a site that compiles results from other online sites: Find this book on BookFinder.com Find this book on ISBNdb.com Find this book on ShopWiki Find this book on BookCascade.co.uk Search many booksellers These sites allow you to search the catalogs of many individual booksellers: Find this book on AbeBooks (Mostly used and out-of-print books. Large number of listings.) Find this book at Addall which searches multiple book sellers Find this book on Alibris (Used books, out of print books, etc. A network of independent booksellers. Large number of listings.) Find this book on Bookshop (online book marketplace designed to support independent bookstores) Find this book on Biblio.com (Used, rare and out of print books. 35 million books, 4700 booksellers, many countries.) Find this book on Google Shopping (Google's shopping search service, also available in the UK) Find this book on IndieBound Find this book on NiceBooks.com (New and used, aggregates several sources) Find this book on NiceBooks UK Find this book on Yahoo! Shopping Individual booksellers Find this book on Amazon.com (or .ca, .cn, .de, .es, .fr, .it, .jp, or .uk) Find this book on Angus & Robertson in Australia Find this book on Barnes & Noble Find this book on Better World Books Find this book on BibliOZ Find this book on Bol.com (Mainly Dutch language) Find this book on The Book Depository Find this book on Books-A-Million Find this book on Chapters.indigo.ca Find this book on Dymocks in Australia Find this book on ECampus.com Find this book on eBay Find this book on Fishpond (Australia and New Zealand) Find this book on Flipkart Find this book on Livraria Cultura in Brazil Find this book on MPH Bookstore Malaysia Find this book on National Book Store Find this book on Play.com Find this book on Powell's Books Find this book on Rediff.com Find this book on Strand Bookstore (used – NYC) Find this book on Waterstones Find this book on Wipf and Stock Book-swapping websites Find this book on BookCrossing.com Find this book on BookMooch.com Find this book on inventaire.io Find this book on PaperBackSwap.com Non-English book sources If the book you are looking for is in a language other than English, you might find it helpful to look at the equivalent pages on other Wikipedias, linked below – they are more likely to have sources appropriate for that language. Special:BookSources in other language Wikipedias ISBN Prefix Ranges Wikipedia 0 1 English (this page) 2 979-10 French 3 German 4 (Japan) Japanese 5 (Russia, former USSR) Russian 7 (China, PR) 957/986 (Taiwan, ROC) 962/988 (Hong Kong, SAR) 981 (Singapore) 99937 (Macau, SAR) Chinese 80 (Czech Republic) Czech 83 (Poland) Polish 84 (Spain) 950 (Argentina) 956 (Chile) 958 (Colombia) 959 (Cuba) 968/970 (Mexico) 980 (Venezuela) 9942/9978 (Ecuador) Spanish 85 (Brasil) 972 (Portugal) Portuguese 86 (Serbia, Montenegro) Serbian 86 (former Yugoslavia) 953 (Croatia) Croatian 86 (former Yugoslavia) 961 (Slovenia) Slovenian 87 Danish 88 Italian 89 Korean 90 Dutch 91 Swedish 92 International organizations (multilingual) 93 (India) Hindi 93 (India) 955 (Sri Lanka) Tamil 951/952 (Finland) Finnish 953 Bulgarian 955 (Sri Lanka) Sinhalese 960 Greek 963 Hungarian 964/600 (Iran) Persian 965 (Israel) Hebrew 966 (Ukraine) Ukrainian 967 (Malaysia) Malay 969 (Pakistan) Pashto 971 (Philippines) Tagalog 973 (Romania) Romanian 974 (Thailand) Thai 975/9944/605 (Turkey) Turkish 976 (Caribbean Community) See English, Spanish... 977 (Egypt) 978 (Nigeria) 9960/603 (Saudi Arabia) 9931/9947/9961(Algeria) Arabic 979 (Indonesia) Indonesian 982 (South Pacific) See English, French, ... 984 (Bangladesh) Bangla Welsh Bibliographical information These links produce citations in various referencing styles. Bibliographical Information on OttoBib (MLA) Bibliographical Information on OttoBib (APA) Bibliographical Information on OttoBib (Chicago) Bibliographical Information on OttoBib (Wikipedia) Bibliographical Information on OttoBib (BibTeX) Find other editions You can look up ISBNs for different editions of the same book, hardback or paperback, first print or a reprint, even re-editions where the title has changed using xISBN. xISBN's linkages are determined algorithmically, based on the concepts of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. Results in XML Results in HTML You can also convert between 10 and 13 digit ISBN numbers with these tools: ISBN converter at ISBN.org ISBN converter (with optional hyphenation after conversion) at the Library of Congress Find on Wikipedia Find articles on Wikipedia which cite this ISBN. See also Wikipedia:Book sources – "Wikipedia:Book sources" will be clickable in the non-editable version of this page, and will take one to the editable version of this page. Wikipedia talk:Book sources – For questions and discussion about this page. Wikipedia:ISBN – Explanation of MediaWiki software treatment of ISBN numbers. List of academic databases and search engines List of digital library projects List of online encyclopedias List of online databases Wikipedia:List of bibliographies The Wikipedia Library (talk | e) Apply for free access to research! Research tools and services Resource Exchange Reference Desk Research Desk Discover open access Free Resource Guides Book Sources Journal Sources Bibliographies Free newspaper sources Online archives Find Your Local Library tips Find Your Source tips How to find sources Citation tools guide Outreach The Wikipedia Library Bookshelf (meta) Universities and Libraries Archivists Publishers Wikipedia Loves Libraries Wikidata source metadata Get involved Get free access to sources Read the Books & Bytes newsletter Help disambiguate authors of scholarly papers Be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar Teach Library Interns Become a Coordinator Learn about TWL ...Support Open Access... Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:BookSources/0-8044-2404-7" Categories: Wikipedia resources for researchers Hidden categories: Pages with short description Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Special page Variants Views More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools Upload file Special pages Printable version Languages Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2396 ---- LibriVox - Wikipedia LibriVox From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Audiobook library LibriVox Established August 2005 Location Worldwide (USA based) Collection Size 13,537 items (1 January 2020[update])[1] Access and use Members Worldwide volunteers Other information Budget US$5,000 per annum (As of 2010[update]) Director N/A (community-shared) Website librivox.org LibriVox is a group of worldwide volunteers who read and record public domain texts creating free public domain audiobooks for download from their website and other digital library hosting sites on the internet. It was founded in 2005 by Hugh McGuire to provide "Acoustical liberation of books in the public domain"[2] and the LibriVox objective is "To make all books in the public domain available, for free, in audio format on the internet".[3] On 6 August 2016, the project completed project number 10,000.[4][5] and from 2009–2017 was producing about 1,000 items per year.[6] Most releases are in the English language, but many non-English works are also available. There are multiple affiliated projects that are providing additional content. LibriVox is closely affiliated with Project Gutenberg from where the project gets some of its texts, and the Internet Archive that hosts their offerings. Contents 1 History 2 Etymology of LibriVox 3 Organization and funding 4 Production process 5 Content 6 Reputation 7 Quality 8 See also 9 References 10 External links History[edit] Hugh McGuire, founder of LibriVox Can the net harness a bunch of volunteers to help bring books in the public domain to life through podcasting? — Hugh McGuire LibriVox was started in August 2005 by Montreal-based writer Hugh McGuire, who set up a blog, and posed the question.[7][8] The first recorded book[9] was The Secret Agent by Joseph Conrad. The main features of the way LibriVox works have changed little since its inception, although the technology that supports it has been improved by the efforts of its volunteers with web-development skills. Etymology of LibriVox[edit] LibriVox is an invented word inspired by Latin words liber (book) in its genitive form libri and vox (voice), giving the meaning BookVoice (or voice of the book). The word was also coined because of other connotations: liber also means child and free, independent, unrestricted. As the LibriVox forum says: "We like to think LibriVox might be interpreted as 'child of the voice', and 'free voice'. Finally, the other link we like is 'library' so you could imagine it to mean Library of Voice."[10] There has been no decision or consensus by LibriVox founders or the community of volunteers for a single pronunciation of LibriVox. It is accepted that any audible pronunciation is accurate.[11] Organization and funding[edit] LibriVox is a volunteer-run, free content, Public Domain project. It has no budget or legal personality. The development of projects is managed through an Internet forum, supported by an admin team, who also maintain a searchable catalogue database of completed works. In early 2010, LibriVox ran a fundraising drive to raise $20,000 to cover hosting costs for the website of about $5,000/year and improve front- and backend usability.[12] The target was reached in 13 days, and so the fundraising ended and LibriVox suggested that supporters consider making donations to its affiliates and partners, Project Gutenberg [13] and the Internet Archive.[14] Production process[edit] Volunteers can choose new projects to start, either recording on their own or inviting others to join them, or they can contribute to projects that have been started by others. Once a volunteer has recorded his or her contribution, it is uploaded to the site, and proof-listened by members of the LibriVox community. Finished audiobooks are available from the LibriVox website, and MP3 and Ogg Vorbis files are hosted separately by the Internet Archive. Recordings are also available through other means, such as iTunes, and, being free of copyright, they are frequently distributed independently of LibriVox on the Internet and otherwise. Content[edit] LibriVox works per month 2005–2011 LibriVox only records material that is in the public domain in the United States, and all LibriVox books are released with a public domain dedication.[15] Because of copyright restrictions, LibriVox produces recordings of only a limited number of contemporary books. These have included, for example, the 9/11 Commission Report which is a work of the US Federal Government therefore in the Public Domain. The LibriVox catalogue is varied. It contains much popular classic fiction, but also includes less predictable texts, such as Immanuel Kant's Critique of Pure Reason and a recording of the first 500 digits of pi. The collection also features poetry, plays, religious texts (for example, English versions of the Koran and books from various translations of the Bible) and non-fiction of various kinds. In January 2009, the catalogue contained approximately 55 percent fiction and drama, 25 percent non-fiction and 20 percent poetry (calculated by numbers of recordings). By the end of 2019, the most downloaded book (8,1M) was a collaborative reading of Alice's Adventures in Wonderland.[1] Around 90 percent of the catalogue is recorded in English, but recordings exist in 31 languages altogether (as of February 2010[update]). Chinese, French and German are the most popular languages other than English amongst volunteers, but recordings have also been made in languages including Urdu and Tagalog. Reputation[edit] LibriVox has garnered significant interest, in particular from those interested in the promotion of volunteer-led content and alternative approaches to copyright ownership on the Internet. It has received support from the Internet Archive and Project Gutenberg. Intellectual freedom and commons proponent Mike Linksvayer described it in 2008 as "perhaps the most interesting collaborative culture project this side of Wikipedia".[16] The project has also been featured in press around the world and has been recommended by the BBC's Click, MSNBC's The Today Show, Reason,[17] Wired,[18] the US PC Magazine and the UK Metro and Sunday Times[19] newspapers. Quality[edit] A frequent concern of listeners is the site's policy of allowing any recording to be published as long as it is understandable and faithful to the source text.[20] This means that some recordings are of lower audio fidelity; some feature background noises, non-native accents or other perceived imperfections in comparison to professionally recorded audiobooks.[21][22] While some listeners may object to those books with chapters read by multiple readers,[23] others find this to be a non-issue or even a feature,[24][25][26] though many books are narrated by a single reader. See also[edit] Virtual volunteering Voice acting References[edit] ^ a b "The LibriVox Free Audiobook Collection", The Internet Archive. Retrieved 1 January 2020. ^ "LibriVox Author", LibriVox website. Retrieved 16 April 2015. ^ "Objective LibriVox", LibriVox website. Retrieved 24 August 2011. ^ "Another LibriVox Milestone: 10,000 projects!", librivox.org, 6 August 2016. Retrieved 3 September 2016. ^ "Offerings LibriVox", Archive website. Retrieved 17 April 2015. ^ MaryAnnSpiegel (January 1, 2018). "LibriVox stats". LibriVox. Retrieved January 22, 2018. ^ McGuire, Hugh (9 August 2005). "Welcome to LibriVox". LibriVox.org. Retrieved 20 August 2010. ^ McGuire, Hugh (February 12, 2007). "Clarity (blog entry)". HughMcGuire.net. Retrieved 2009-01-09. ^ "The Secret Agent", librivox.org. Retrieved 31 March 2014. ^ "What does LibriVox mean?", LibriVox forum, retrieved 29 September 2013. ^ "Pronunciation of "LibriVox"", LibriVox wiki. Retrieved 21 November 2011. ^ "LibriVox Needs Your Help", LibriVox blog, 24 February 2010. Retrieved 24 August 2011. ^ "Gutenberg Affiliates", Gutenberg.org, Retrieved 19 April 2015. ^ "Archive.org partners", Archive.org, Retrieved 19 April 2015. ^ "Public Domain". LibriVox. Retrieved 11 November 2018. ^ Linksvayer, Mike (June 2, 2008). "LibriVox: 1500 public domain audio books (blog entry)". Retrieved 2009-01-09. ^ "The Wealth of LibriVox", Reason.com, Retrieved 19 April 2015. ^ "The Web Will Read You a Story", archive.org, Retrieved 19 April 2015. ^ "Public Domain Books, Ready for Your iPod", nytimes.com, Retrieved 19 April 2015. ^ "Quality of Delivery?", Librivox forums. Retrieved 22 November 2011. ^ "The Return of the Native Audiobook (Librivox) Archived 2012-04-25 at the Wayback Machine", Review. Retrieved 22 November 2011. ^ "On the absence of ratings at LibriVox", Review 2 May 2010. Retrieved 22 November 2011. ^ "Librivox - free audio books", Review. Retrieved 22 November 2011. ^ "Librivox (free audio books)", Review January 09, 2009. Retrieved 22 November 2011. ^ "Librivox", Review October 1, 2008. Retrieved 22 November 2011. ^ "My Favorite LibriVox Readers", Review 12 March 2010. Retrieved 22 November 2011. External links[edit] Wikimedia Commons has media related to LibriVox. Wikidata has the property: LibriVox author ID (P1899) (see uses) Wikinews has related news: Interview with LibriVox founder Hugh McGuire Listen to this article (3.3 megabytes) This audio file was created from a revision of this article dated 14 July 2007 (2007-07-14), and does not reflect subsequent edits. (Audio help · More spoken articles) LibriVox site LibriVox home page and LibriVox Catalogue of Audio Books Articles Xeni Tech story from NPR's Day to Day, "Amateur Audio Books Catch Fire on the Web" Reason Magazine: The Wealth of LibriVox (May 2007) LibriVox mirrors LibriVox at Internet Archive (full mirror with streaming and reviews) Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=LibriVox&oldid=994042733" Categories: Accessible information Audiobook companies and organizations American book websites Collaborative projects Open content projects Public domain books Hidden categories: Webarchive template wayback links Articles with short description Short description matches Wikidata Articles containing potentially dated statements from January 2020 All articles containing potentially dated statements Articles containing potentially dated statements from 2010 Articles containing Latin-language text Articles containing potentially dated statements from February 2010 Commons category link is on Wikidata Articles with hAudio microformats Spoken articles Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Languages العربية Boarisch Чӑвашла Deutsch Ελληνικά Español Esperanto فارسی Français Galego 한국어 Bahasa Indonesia Italiano Magyar Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Português Română Русский Simple English Suomi اردو 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 13 December 2020, at 20:41 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2398 ---- Rubaʿi - Wikipedia Rubaʿi From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia   (Redirected from Ruba'i) Jump to navigation Jump to search For the 2017 film, see Rubaai (film). Calligraphic rendition of a ruba'i attributed to Omar Khayyam from Bodleian MS. Ouseley 140 (one of the sources of FitzGerald's Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam). Rubāʿī (Persian: رباعی‎, rubāʿiyy, plural: رباعيات‎, rubāʿiyāt)[1] is the term for a quatrain, a poem or a verse of a poem consisting of four lines. It refers specifically to a form of Persian poetry, or its derivative form in English and other languages. In classical Persian poetry, the ruba'i is written as a four-line (or two-couplet) poem, with a rhyme-scheme AABA or AAAA.[2][3][4][5] This is an example of a ruba'i from Rūmī's Dīwān-i Shams: Anwār-i Ṣalāḥ-i Dīn bar angēkhta bād Dar dīda u jān-i ʿāshiqān rēkhta bād Har jān ki laṭīf gasht u az luṭf guzasht Bā khāk-i Ṣalāḥ-i Dīn dar āmēkhta bād May the splendors of Salahuddin be roused, And poured into the eyes and souls of the lovers. May every soul that has become refined and has surpassed refinement Be mingled with the dust of Salahuddin![6] Contents 1 Metre 2 In English 3 See also 4 References 5 External links Metre[edit] Further information: Persian metres The usual metre of a Persian ruba'i, which is used for all four lines of the above quatrain by Rumi, is as follows:[7] – – u u – u – u – – u u – In the above scheme, "–" represents a long syllable, and "u" a short one. As variations of this scheme, any sequence of – u can be replaced by a single "overlong" syllable, such as gēkh, tīf, luṭf in the poem above, containing either a long vowel followed by a consonant other than "n", or a short vowel followed by two consonants. An overlong syllable can also freely be substituted for the final syllable of the line, as with bād above. Another variation is that occasionally a sequence of two short syllables (u u) can be replaced by a single long one (–). A third variation is to use the same metre as above, but with the eighth and ninth syllables reversed: – – u u – – u u – – u u – In English[edit] The verse form AABA as used in English verse is known as the Rubaiyat Quatrain due to its use by Edward FitzGerald in his famous 1859 translation, Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam. Algernon Charles Swinburne, one of the first admirers of FitzGerald's translation of Khayyam's medieval Persian verses, was the first to imitate the stanza form, which subsequently became popular and was used widely, as in the case of Robert Frost's 1922 poem "Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening". FitzGerald's translation became so popular by the turn of the century that hundreds of American humorists wrote parodies using the form and, to varying degrees, the content of his stanzas, including The Rubaiyat of Ohow Dryyam, The Rubaiyat of A Persian Kitten, The Rubaiyat of Omar Cayenne and The Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam, Jr. Quatrain VII from the fourth edition of FitzGerald's Rubaiyat: Come, fill the Cup, and in the fire of Spring Your Winter-garment of Repentance fling: The Bird of Time has but a little way To flutter—and the Bird is on the Wing.[8] In extended sequences of ruba'i stanzas, the convention is sometimes extended so that the unrhymed line of the current stanza becomes the rhyme for the following stanza.[9] The structure can be made cyclical by linking the unrhymed line of the final stanza back to the first stanza: ZZAZ.[10] These more stringent systems were not, however, used by FitzGerald in his Rubaiyat. See also[edit] Poetry portal Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam 'Parwaze Taffakkur' – published in 2015 containing about 250 Persian Rubaiyat of renowned Indian Poet Syed Waheed Ashraf[11] References[edit] ^ The Persian noun is borrowed from Arabic rubāʿiyy (رباعي) "consisting of four, quadripartite, fourfold" whose root consonants r-b-ʿ (ر ب ع) also occur in the numeral arbaʿah (أربعة, 'four'). See: Cowan, J. M., ed. 1994. The Hans Wehr Dictionary of Modern Written Arabic (4th edition). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. ^ Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics, Princeton University Press, 1974, p.611 ^ Introduction to The Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam, translated by Peter Avery and John Heath-Stubbs, Penguin Classics, 1981, ISBN 0-14-044384-3, p. 9 [1] ^ The Cambridge History of Iran, v. 4, edited by R. N. Frye, Cambridge University Press, 1999, ISBN 0-521-20093-8, pgs. 633-634 [2] ^ Elwell-Sutton, L. P. "The Foundations of Persian Prosody and Metrics," Iran, v. 13 (1975), p. 92. ^ "The Splendors of Salahuddin". ^ L. P. Elwell-Sutton (1986), “ʿARŪŻ,” Encyclopaedia Iranica, II/6-7, pp. 670-679. ^ [3] ^ Skelton, Robin (2002). The Shapes of Our Singing: A Comprehensive Guide to Verse Forms and Metres from Around the World. Spokane, WA: Eastern Washington University Press. p. 106. ISBN 0-910055-76-9. ^ Turco, Lewis (2000). The Book of Forms: A Handbook of Poetics. Lebanon, NH: University Press of New England. p. 245. ISBN 1-58465-022-2. ^ [4] External links[edit] Dr.Amjad Parvez (25 March 2013). "A splendid poetry collection". Daily Times. Archived from the original on 18 January 2014. Retrieved 11 April 2014. Tajik girls reciting ruba'i quatrains v t e Literary composition General topics Literature Fiction writing Writer Characterization Exposition Description Writer's block Techniques / devices Linguistic contrast Literary contrast Trope Idiom Cliché Methods Writing process Mimesis Plagiarism Cut-up technique Pastiche Assemblage Diegesis Features Writing style Stylistics Writer's voice Grammatical mood Tone Register Rhetorical modes Forms Novel Screenplay Short story Poetry Essay Joke Creative nonfiction Beyond the arts Composition studies Technical writing Articulation (sociological) v t e Poetry of different cultures and languages Albanian American Anglo-Welsh Arabic Assamese Australian Bengali Biblical British Bulgarian Byzantine Canadian Chinese Cantonese Cornish English Estonian Finnish French Greek Guernésiais Gujarati Hindi Hebrew Indian Indian epic Irish Italian Japanese Javanese Jèrriais Kannada Kashmiri Korean Latin Latin American Latino Manx Marathi Malayalam Nepali New Zealand Old English Old Norse Ottoman Pakistani Pashto Persian Polish Portuguese Punjabi Rajasthani Russian Sanskrit Classical Vedic Scottish Serbian Serbian epic Sindhi Slovak Spanish Tamil Telugu Thai Turkish Urdu Vietnamese Welsh This poetry-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. v t e Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rubaʿi&oldid=988692242" Categories: Poetry stubs Stanzaic form Persian literature Medieval poetry Iranian inventions Hidden categories: Articles containing Persian-language text Articles containing Arabic-language text All stub articles Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages العربية Azərbaycanca Bân-lâm-gú Башҡортса Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ Deutsch Eesti Español Esperanto فارسی Français Հայերեն Ирон Italiano עברית Қазақша Lietuvių Македонски Bahasa Melayu Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча ਪੰਜਾਬੀ پنجابی پښتو Polski Русский سنڌي Татарча/tatarça తెలుగు ไทย Türkçe Українська اردو Tiếng Việt Zazaki Edit links This page was last edited on 14 November 2020, at 18:23 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2414 ---- Information for "Horace" - Wikipedia Help Information for "Horace" Jump to navigation Jump to search Contents Basic information Page protection Edit history Page properties External tools Basic information Display title Horace Default sort key Horace Page length (in bytes) 85,696 Page ID 13693 Page content language en - English Page content model wikitext Indexing by robots Allowed Number of page watchers 237 Number of page watchers who visited recent edits 29 Number of redirects to this page 6 Counted as a content page Yes Page image Page views in the past 30 days 19,489 Wikidata item ID Q6197 Local description Roman lyric poet Central description Roman lyric poet Page protection Edit Allow all users (no expiry set) Move Allow all users (no expiry set) View the protection log for this page. Edit history Page creator 205.232.67.xxx (talk) Date of page creation 17:35, 27 August 2001 Latest editor Monkbot (talk | contribs) Date of latest edit 13:30, 4 December 2020 Total number of edits 1,404 Recent number of edits (within past 30 days) 1 Recent number of distinct authors 1 Page properties Hidden categories (42) This page is a member of 42 hidden categories (help) : Category:AC with 30 elements Category:All articles with unsourced statements Category:Articles with Internet Archive links Category:Articles with LibriVox links Category:Articles with Project Gutenberg links Category:Articles with short description Category:Articles with unsourced statements from August 2014 Category:Pages using Sister project links with default search Category:Pages using Sister project links with wikidata mismatch Category:Pages using Sister project links with wikidata namespace mismatch Category:Short description matches Wikidata Category:Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Category:Wikipedia articles with BNC identifiers Category:Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Category:Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Category:Wikipedia articles with CANTIC identifiers Category:Wikipedia articles with CINII identifiers Category:Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Category:Wikipedia articles with ICCU identifiers Category:Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Category:Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Category:Wikipedia articles with LNB identifiers Category:Wikipedia articles with MusicBrainz identifiers Category:Wikipedia articles with NDL identifiers Category:Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Category:Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers Category:Wikipedia articles with NLG identifiers Category:Wikipedia articles with NLI identifiers Category:Wikipedia articles with NLK identifiers Category:Wikipedia articles with NLP identifiers Category:Wikipedia articles with NSK identifiers Category:Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Category:Wikipedia articles with RERO identifiers Category:Wikipedia articles with RSL identifiers Category:Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Category:Wikipedia articles with SNAC-ID identifiers Category:Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Category:Wikipedia articles with Trove identifiers Category:Wikipedia articles with ULAN identifiers Category:Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Category:Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Category:Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Transcluded templates (118) Pages transcluded onto the current version of this page (help): Horace (edit) Template:About (view source) (template editor protected) Template:Ancient Rome topics (view source) (semi-protected) Template:Authority control (view source) (template editor protected) Template:Br separated entries (view source) (template editor protected) Template:Catalog lookup link (view source) (template editor protected) Template:Category handler (view source) (protected) Template:Citation needed (view source) (protected) Template:Cite book (view source) (protected) Template:Column-width (view source) (template editor protected) Template:Comma separated entries (view source) (template editor protected) Template:Delink (view source) (template editor protected) Template:EditAtWikidata (view source) (protected) Template:Em dash (view source) (template editor protected) Template:Emdash (view source) (template editor protected) Template:Error-small (view source) (template editor protected) Template:Fix (view source) (protected) Template:Fix/category (view source) (template editor protected) Template:Gutenberg author (view source) (template editor protected) Template:Hide in print (view source) (template editor protected) Template:Horace (edit) Template:IPAc-en (view source) (template editor protected) Template:ISBN (view source) (template editor protected) Template:If empty (view source) (template editor protected) Template:Infobox (view source) (template editor protected) Template:Infobox writer (view source) (template editor protected) Template:Internet Archive author (view source) (template editor protected) Template:JSTOR (view source) (semi-protected) Template:Library link about (view source) (template editor protected) Template:Library link by (view source) (semi-protected) Template:Library resources box (view source) (template editor protected) Template:Librivox author (view source) (template editor protected) Template:Main other (view source) (protected) Template:Navbox (view source) (template editor protected) Template:Nobold (view source) (template editor protected) Template:Nobold/styles.css (view source) (template editor protected) Template:Only in print (view source) (template editor protected) Template:PAGENAMEBASE (view source) (template editor protected) Template:Pagetype (view source) (protected) Template:Poem quote (view source) (semi-protected) Template:Poemquote (view source) (semi-protected) Template:Portal (view source) (template editor protected) Template:Quotation (view source) (template editor protected) Template:Quote (view source) (template editor protected) Template:Quote/styles.css (view source) (template editor protected) Template:Reflist (view source) (protected) Template:SDcat (view source) (template editor protected) Template:Short description (view source) (template editor protected) Template:Sister project links (view source) (template editor protected) Template:Sisterlinks (view source) (template editor protected) This list may be incomplete. Wikidata entities used in this page date of birth Label: en date of death Label: en Horace Sitelink Title Other (Statements) Some statements Description: en External tools Revision history search Revision history statistics Edits by user Page view statistics WikiChecker Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horace" Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Page information Wikidata item Languages Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2428 ---- Diodorus Siculus - Wikipedia Diodorus Siculus From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Ancient Greek historian "Diodorus" redirects here. For other uses, see Diodorus (disambiguation). Diodorus Siculus Diodorus Siculus as depicted in a 19th-century fresco Born c. 90 BC Agira, Sicily Died c. 30 BC (aged 60) Known for Bibliotheca historica Scientific career Fields History Influenced Jerome Charles Henry Oldfather Diodorus Siculus (/ˌdaɪəˈdɔːrəs ˈsɪkjʊləs/; Koinē Greek: Διόδωρος Σικελιώτης Diodoros Sikeliotes) (fl. 1st century BC) or Diodorus of Sicily was an ancient Greek historian. He is known for writing the monumental universal history Bibliotheca historica, in forty books, fifteen of which survive intact,[1] between 60 and 30 BC. The history broke new ground in not being Hellenocentric, partly because of Stoic influences on his belief in the brotherhood of all men.[2] The history is arranged in three parts. The first covers mythic history up to the destruction of Troy, arranged geographically, describing regions around the world from Egypt, India and Arabia to Europe. The second covers the time from the Trojan War to the death of Alexander the Great. The third covers the period to about 60 BC. Bibliotheca, meaning 'library', acknowledges that he was drawing on the work of many other authors. Contents 1 Life 2 Work 2.1 Details 3 See also 4 Notes 5 References 6 Further reading 7 External links Life[edit] According to his own work, he was born at Agyrium in Sicily (now called Agira).[3] With one exception, antiquity affords no further information about his life and doings beyond in his work. Only Jerome, in his Chronicon under the "year of Abraham 1968" (49 BC), writes, "Diodorus of Sicily, a writer of Greek history, became illustrious". However, his English translator, Charles Henry Oldfather, remarks on the "striking coincidence"[4] that one of only two known Greek inscriptions from Agyrium (Inscriptiones Graecae XIV, 588) is the tombstone of one "Diodorus, the son of Apollonius".[5] Work[edit] Main article: Bibliotheca historica Bibliotheca historica, 1746 Diodorus' universal history, which he named Bibliotheca historica (Greek: Βιβλιοθήκη Ἱστορική, "Historical Library"), was immense and consisted of 40 books, of which 1–5 and 11–20 survive:[6] fragments of the lost books are preserved in Photius and the excerpts of Constantine Porphyrogenitus. It was divided into three sections. The first six books treated the mythic history of the non-Hellenic and Hellenic tribes to the destruction of Troy and are geographical in theme, and describe the history and culture of Ancient Egypt (book I), of Mesopotamia, India, Scythia, and Arabia (II), of North Africa (III), and of Greece and Europe (IV–VI). In the next section (books VII–XVII), he recounts the history of the world from the Trojan War down to the death of Alexander the Great. The last section (books XVII to the end) concerns the historical events from the successors of Alexander down to either 60 BC or the beginning of Julius Caesar's Gallic Wars. (The end has been lost, so it is unclear whether Diodorus reached the beginning of the Gallic War as he promised at the beginning of his work or, as evidence suggests, old and tired from his labours he stopped short at 60 BC.) He selected the name "Bibliotheca" in acknowledgment that he was assembling a composite work from many sources. Identified authors on whose works he drew include Hecataeus of Abdera, Ctesias of Cnidus, Ephorus, Theopompus, Hieronymus of Cardia, Duris of Samos, Diyllus, Philistus, Timaeus, Polybius, and Posidonius. Details[edit] His book on Egypt, besides accounts of education, medicine, and Egyptian animal worship,[7] included the inscription of Osymandias - “If anyone wishes to know how mighty I am and where I lie, let him surpass any of my works” - which was Shelley’s inspiration for his poem Ozymandias.[8] Diodorus provides a fuller account of the half-century preceding the Peloponnesian War than Thucydides, and a more extensive, and arguably less biased, account of fourth century Greece than Xenophon.[9] Diodorus also provides details of Pytheas’s voyage to Britain, including data about Cornish mining, and the judgement that “The inhabitants of Britain...are simple in their habits, and far removed from the cunning and knavishness of modern man”.[10] His account of gold mining in Nubia in eastern Egypt (Book III Chapters 12-14)[11] describes in vivid detail the use of slave labour in terrible working conditions, while he provides an equally sympathetic account of the slave mines in Spain.[12] Karl Marx in Das Kapital, for his account of the overworking of slave labour, wrote “Only read Diodorus Siculus”.[13] Diodorus also gave an account of the Gauls: "The Gauls are terrifying in aspect and their voices are deep and altogether harsh; when they meet together they converse with few words and in riddles, hinting darkly at things for the most part and using one word when they mean another; and they like to talk in superlatives, to the end that they may extol themselves and depreciate all other men. They are also boasters and threateners and are fond of pompous language, and yet they have sharp wits and are not without cleverness at learning." (Book 5)[14] See also[edit] Pliny the Elder Strabo Acadine Notes[edit] ^ S Usher, The Historians of Greece and Rome (London 1969) p. 235 ^ S Usher, The Historians of Greece and Rome (London 1969) p. 235 ^ Diod. History 1.4.4. ^ Diodorus of Sicily In Twelve Volumes by Charles Henry Oldfather (1977), Introduction. ^ Ctesias' Persian History: Introduction, text, and translation by Ctesias by Jan P. Stronk (2010), p. 60. ^ "Diodorus Siculus" entry in the Encyclopædia Britannica. ^ A R David, The Egyptian Kingdoms (Oxford 1975) p. 43 ^ M Macovski ed, Dialogue and Critical Discourse (OUP 1997) p. 40 ^ S Usher, The Historians of Greece and Rome (London 1969) p. 237 ^ M Cary, The Ancient Explorers (Penguin 1963) p. 48-50 ^ "LacusCurtius • Diodorus Siculus — Book III Chapters 12‑14". uchicago.edu. ^ S Usher, The Historians of Greece and Rome (London 1969) p. 236 ^ K Marx, Capital (OUP 2008) p. 151 ^ "LacusCurtius • Diodorus Siculus — Book V Chapters 19‑40". uchicago.edu. References[edit] Ambaglio, Dino, Franca Landucci Gattinoni and Luigi Bravi. Diodoro Siculo: Biblioteca storica: commento storico: introduzione generale. Storia. Ricerche. Milano: V&P, 2008. x, 145 p. Buckley, Terry (1996). Aspects of Greek History 750-323 BC: A Source-based Approach. London: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-09958-7. Siculus, Diodorus; Oldfather, C. H. (Translator) (1935). Library of History: Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press. Siculus, Diodorus; G. Booth (Translator); H. Valesius; I. Rhodomannus; F. Ursinus (1814). The Historical Library of Diodorus the Sicilian in Fifteen Books to which are added the Fragments of Diodorus. London: J. Davis. Downloadable via Google Books. Siculi, Diodori; Peter Wesseling (Editor); L. Rhodoman; G. Heyn; N. Eyring (1798). Bibliothecae Historicae Libri Qui Supersunt: Nova Editio (in Ancient Greek and Latin). Argentorati: Societas Bipontina.CS1 maint: extra text: authors list (link) Downloadable via Google Books. Further reading[edit] Braithwaite-Westoby, Kara. "Diodorus and the Alleged Revolts of 374–373 BCE," Classical Philology 115, no. 2 (April 2020): 265-270. Clarke, Katherine. 1999. "Universal perspectives in Historiography." In The Limits of Historiography: Genre and Narrative in Ancient Historical Texts. Edited by Christina Shuttleworth Kraus, 249–279. Mnemosyne. Supplementum 191. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. Hammond, Nicholas G. L. 1998. "Portents, Prophecies, and Dreams in Diodorus’ Books 14–17." Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 39.4: 407–428. McQueen, Earl I. 1995. Diodorus Siculus. The Reign of Philip II: The Greek and Macedonian Narrative from Book XVI. A Companion. London: Bristol Classical Press. Muntz, Charles E. 2017. Diodorus Siculus and the World of the Late Roman Republic. New York: Oxford Univ. Press. Pfuntner, Laura. 2015. "Reading Diodorus through Photius: The Case of the Sicilian Slave Revolts." Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 55.1: 256–272. Rubincam, Catherine. 1987. "The Organization and Composition of Diodorus’ Bibliotheke." Échos du monde classique (= Classical views) 31:313–328. Sacks, Kenneth S. 1990. Diodorus Siculus and the First Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press. Sinclair, Robert K. 1963. "Diodorus Siculus and the Writing of History." Proceedings of the African Classical Association 6:36–45. Stronk, Jan P. 2017. Semiramis’ Legacy. The History of Persia According to Diodorus of Sicily. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Univ. Press. Sulimani, Iris. 2008. "Diodorus’ Source-Citations: A Turn in the Attitude of Ancient Authors Towards their Predecessors?" Athenaeum 96.2: 535–567. External links[edit] Library resources about Didorus Siculus Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries By Didorus Siculus Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries Wikimedia Commons has media related to Diodorus Siculus. Wikisource has original works written by or about: Diodorus Siculus Wikiquote has quotations related to: Diodorus Siculus Greek original works  Greek Wikisource has original text related to this article: Ιστορική Βιβλιοθήκη Siculus, Diodorus. "Library" (in Ancient Greek). Perseus Digital Library. pp. Books 1‑5 only. Retrieved 2017-09-06. "The Library of History" (in Ancient Greek). LacusCurtius. pp. Books 6-10 only. Retrieved 2017-09-06. Siculus, Diodorus. "Library" (in Ancient Greek). Perseus Digital Library. pp. Books 9‑17 only. Retrieved 2017-09-06. English translations Works by Diodorus Siculus at Project Gutenberg Siculus, Diodorus; C.H. Oldfather et al. (Translators). "The Library of History". LacusCurtius. pp. Books 1‑32 only. Retrieved 2017-06-25. Siculus, Diodorus; C.H. Oldfather (Translator). "Library". Theoi E-Texts Library. pp. Books 4‑6 only. Retrieved 2008-10-08. Siculus, Diodorus; C.H. Oldfather (Translator). "Library". Perseus Digital Library. pp. Books 9‑17 only. Retrieved 2017-06-25. Siculus, Diodorus; Andrew Smith (Translator). "Historical Library". Attalus.org. pp. Books 33‑40 only. Retrieved 2014-02-07. Authority control BIBSYS: 90321794 BNE: XX1076951 BNF: cb11900233c (data) CANTIC: a11185818 CiNii: DA01310863 GND: 118679627 ICCU: IT\ICCU\CFIV\068396 ISNI: 0000 0001 2020 835X LCCN: n50028820 LNB: 000012489 NDL: 00746934 NKC: jn19981000658 NLA: 35763969 NSK: 000084353 NTA: 06809499X RERO: 02-A000051703 SELIBR: 49277 SUDOC: 026832682 Trove: 1076593 VcBA: 495/14135 VIAF: 56608763 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n50028820 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Diodorus_Siculus&oldid=982689547" Categories: Roman-era Greek historians Historians from Magna Graecia Classical geography Sicilian Greeks 1st-century BC Greek people 1st-century BC historians 90s BC births 30s BC deaths Works about mining Hellenistic-era historians Hidden categories: Articles with short description Short description matches Wikidata Articles with hCards Articles containing Koinē Greek-language text Articles containing Ancient Greek (to 1453)-language text CS1 maint: extra text: authors list CS1 foreign language sources (ISO 639-2) CS1 Latin-language sources (la) Commons category link from Wikidata Articles with Project Gutenberg links Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CANTIC identifiers Wikipedia articles with CINII identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ICCU identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with LNB identifiers Wikipedia articles with NDL identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers Wikipedia articles with NSK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with RERO identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with Trove identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikiquote Wikisource Languages Afrikaans Alemannisch አማርኛ العربية Asturianu Azərbaycanca Беларуская Български Brezhoneg Català Čeština Corsu Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français Gaeilge Galego 한국어 Հայերեն Hrvatski Bahasa Indonesia Íslenska Italiano עברית ქართული Кыргызча Latina Lingua Franca Nova Magyar Македонски മലയാളം مصرى Bahasa Melayu Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Occitan Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча Piemontèis Plattdüütsch Polski Português Română Русский Scots Shqip Sicilianu Simple English Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Türkçe Українська Winaray 吴语 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 9 October 2020, at 18:28 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2401 ---- List of Roman consuls - Wikipedia List of Roman consuls From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Wikimedia list article "List of rulers of the Roman Republic" redirects here. For a list of rulers of the Roman Empire, see List of Roman emperors. Ancient Rome This article is part of a series on the politics and government of ancient Rome Periods Roman Kingdom 753–509 BC Roman Republic 509–27 BC Roman Empire 27 BC – AD 395 Principate 27 BC – AD 284 Dominate AD 284–641 Western AD 395–476 Eastern AD 395–1453 Timeline Roman Constitution Constitution of the Kingdom Constitution of the Republic Constitution of the Empire Constitution of the Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Executive magistrates Precedent and law Roman law Ius Imperium Mos maiorum Collegiality Auctoritas Roman citizenship Cursus honorum Senatus consultum Senatus consultum ultimum Assemblies Centuriate Curiate Plebeian Tribal Ordinary magistrates Consul Praetor Quaestor Promagistrate Aedile Tribune Censor Governor Extraordinary magistrates Corrector Dictator Magister equitum Consular tribune Rex Triumviri Decemviri Titles and honours Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Praeses Praefectus Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Other countries v t e This is a list of consuls known to have held office, from the beginning of the Roman Republic to the latest use of the title in Imperial times, together with those magistrates of the Republic who were appointed in place of consuls, or who superseded consular authority for a limited period. Contents 1 Background 1.1 Republican consuls 1.2 Other magistrates included 1.3 The consulship in imperial times 1.4 Chronology 1.5 Consules prior and posterior 1.6 Other lists of consuls 2 Key 2.1 Latin terms 2.2 Abbreviations for praenomina 2.3 Colors 3 6th century BC (509–501) 4 5th century BC (500–401) 5 4th century BC (400–301) 6 3rd century BC (300–201) 7 2nd century BC (200–101) 8 1st century BC (100–1) 9 1st century (1–100) 10 2nd century (101–200) 11 3rd century (201–300) 12 4th century (301–395) 13 Roman Consuls of East and West (396–534) 14 Roman Consuls of the East alone (535–887) 15 References 16 Further reading 16.1 Primary sources 16.2 Secondary sources 17 External links Background[edit] Republican consuls[edit] From the establishment of the Republic to the time of Augustus, the consuls were the chief magistrates of the Roman state, and normally there were two of them, so that the executive power of the state was not vested in a single individual, as it had been under the kings.[1][2] As other ancient societies dated historical events according to the reigns of their kings, it became customary at Rome to date events by the names of the consuls in office when the events occurred, rather than (for instance) by counting the number of years since the foundation of the city, although that method could also be used.[2] If a consul died during his year of office, another was elected to replace him. Although his imperium was the same as his predecessor's, he was termed consul suffectus, in order to distinguish him from the consul ordinarius whom he replaced; but the eponymous magistrates for each year were normally the consules ordinarii.[1][2] Because of this method of dating events, it was important to keep records of each year's eponymous magistrates. Many such lists have survived, either in the form of monumental inscriptions, conventionally referred to as fasti, or indirectly through the ancient historians, who had access to linen rolls recording the names of magistrates. Although these lists account for the entire period of the Republic, and most of Imperial times, there are discrepancies due to gaps and disagreements between different sources. Many of these no doubt arose as copying errors, especially those that involved the substitution of a familiar name for a less common one. Others may represent later attempts to edit the lists in order to explain deficiencies in the record, to reconcile conflicting traditions, or to ascribe particular actions or events to the time of a particular individual.[3] Other magistrates included[edit] Occasionally, the authority of the consuls was temporarily superseded by the appointment of a dictator, who held greater imperium than that of the consuls.[1] By tradition, these dictators laid down their office upon the completion of the task for which they were nominated, or after a maximum period of six months, and did not continue in office longer than the year for which the nominating consul had been elected.[4] However, in four years at the end of the 4th century BC, dictators are said to have continued in office in the year following their nomination, in place of consuls. Modern scholars are skeptical of these years, which might be due to later editing of the lists of magistrates in order to fill a gap.[5] All known dictators have been included in this table. Two other types of magistrates are listed during the period of the Republic. In the year 451 BC, a board of ten men, known as decemviri, or decemvirs, was appointed in place of the consuls in order to draw up the tables of Roman law, in a sense establishing the Roman constitution. According to tradition, a second college of decemvirs was appointed for the next year, and these continued in office illegally into 449, until they were overthrown in a popular revolt, and the consulship was reinstated.[6][7] Among the disputes which the decemvirs failed to resolve was the relationship between the patricians, Rome's hereditary aristocracy, and the plebeians, or common citizens. Although it has been argued that some of the consuls prior to the Decemvirate may have been plebeians, the office was definitely closed to them in the second half of the 5th century BC. To prevent open hostility between the two orders, the office of military tribune with consular power, or "consular tribune", was established. In place of patrician consuls, the people could elect a number of military tribunes, who might be either patrician or plebeian.[2][8] According to Livy, this compromise held until 376 BC, when two of the tribunes of the plebs, Gaius Licinius Calvus Stolo and Lucius Sextius Lateranus, blocked the election of any magistrates for the following year, unless the senate would agree to place a law before the people opening the consulship to the plebeians, and effecting other important reforms. The senate refused, and the tribunes continued to prevent the election of magistrates for several years until the senate capitulated, and the lex Licinia Sextia was passed, leading to the election of the first plebeian consul in 367.[2][8][9] Other accounts of this event are inconsistent, and current scholarly opinion is that the duration of the period without magistrates may have been exaggerated, or even invented to fill a gap in the record; nevertheless Roman tradition unanimously holds that Licinius and Sextius were able to open the consulship to the plebeians.[10] The consulship in imperial times[edit] In imperial times the consulship became the senior administrative office under the emperors, who frequently assumed the title of consul themselves, and appointed other consuls at will.[1] The consulship was often bestowed as a political favour, or a reward for faithful service. Because there could only be two consuls at once, the emperors frequently appointed several sets of suffecti sequentially in the course of a year; holding the consulship for an entire year became a special honour.[1][2] As the office lost much of its executive authority, and the number of consuls appointed for short and often irregular periods increased, surviving lists from Imperial times are often incomplete, and have been reconstructed from many sources, not always with much certainty. In many cases it is stated that a particular person had been consul, but the exact time cannot be firmly established. As an institution, the consulship survived the abdication of the last emperor of the West, and for a time consuls continued to be appointed, one representing the Eastern Roman Empire, and the other the Western, even as the Western Empire dissolved as a political entity. The last consuls appointed represented only the Eastern Empire, until finally the title became the sole province of the Emperor, who might or might not assume it upon taking office.[1][2] Chronology[edit] For the early Republic, this article observes the Varronian chronology, established by the historian Marcus Terentius Varro, who calculated that Rome was founded in what is now called the year 753 BC (the founding of the city was traditionally observed on the Palilia, a festival occurring on April 21). This becomes the year 1 ab urbe condita, or AUC. The Republic was established in 245 AUC, or 509 BC. Although other ancient historians gave different years, Varro's chronology was the most widely accepted; it was used in the Fasti Capitolini, and its use by Censorinus brought it to the attention of Joseph Scaliger, who helped popularize its use in modern times.[11][12] For Imperial times, the dates of the consules ordinarii are far more certain than those of the suffecti, who were not recorded with the same attention as the eponymous magistrates. Their identification and dating is far more controversial, and despite the efforts of generations of scholars, gaps in coverage remain. Known consules suffecti are shown with their known (or reconstructed) dates of tenure, which normally varied from two to six months — although one suffect consul, Rosius Regulus, is known to have held the fasces for a single day, October 31, AD 69.[13] Where neither consul is known or inferred for a portion of the year, their names are omitted for convenience; if one consul can be named, but his colleague is unknown, the unnamed colleague is listed as ignotus (unknown). Consules prior and posterior[edit] Consuls during the Republic and the early Empire are identified as consul prior and consul posterior, terms that the Romans used to distinguish between the magistrates. The consul prior was the more senior and esteemed of the pair. Under the Republic he was elected first, and had priority in holding the fasces, as well as the honor of being named first in the lists for the year, although in all other respects the two consuls' authority was equal.[1][14] The order of the consuls of the Republic was however edited in the Fasti Capitolini. Augustus and several prominent patricians falsified the Fasti by listing some of their ancestors as consuls prior. Livy apparently gives the initial order throughout most of his work, but seems to have followed the new "official" order in his later books; perhaps he was influenced by the imperial propaganda.[15] When the emperor assumed the consulship, he was necessarily consul prior. This distinction continued until the 4th century AD, when the Empire was divided into a Western Roman Empire and an Eastern Roman Empire: the consuls who were appointed by the court in the Western Empire, which was sometimes at Rome, are commonly identified as the "Western consul", and those appointed by the court in the Eastern, usually Constantinople, the "Eastern consul". These designations were used until the end of the consulship in the 6th century.[16] Other lists of consuls[edit] For a list of consuls whose year of office is uncertain or entirely unknown (usually suffecti, although some of the ordinarii in the breakaway Gallic Empire also lack dates[17]), see the List of undated Roman consuls. For those individuals who were elected consul but never assumed the office due to death, disgrace, or any other reason, see List of Roman consuls designate. Key[edit] Latin terms[edit] Imperator (abbreviated Imp.) = literally "commander"; originally an honorary title bestowed upon a general by his soldiers, the term later became part of the style of the emperors, and the word "emperor" is derived from it. suffectus (abbreviated suff.) = a substitute elected or appointed in place of a magistrate who died or resigned. Information is not available for all consules suffecti, and some may not be listed. ignotus = unknown. All consuls who can be assigned to a particular date, at least tentatively, are included in this table. If neither consul for a given period is known, they are entirely omitted; if one is known, and the other is not, the unknown colleague is referred to as ignotus. sine collega = without colleague. On a few occasions before the dissolution of the Western Empire, only one consul was appointed. post consulatum = after the (preceding) consulship. Used for gaps when no consuls were appointed for a period following the end of another consulship, or at least none are known to have been appointed. inter alios = among others. Abbreviations for praenomina[edit] A. = Aulus Ap. = Appius C. = Gaius Cn. = Gnaeus D. = Decimus K. = Caeso L. = Lucius M. = Marcus M'. = Manius Mam. = Mamercus N. = Numerius Opet. = Opiter P. = Publius Post. = Postumus Proc. = Proculus Q. = Quintus Ser. = Servius Sex. = Sextus Sp. = Spurius T. = Titus Ti. = Tiberius Vop. = Vopiscus Colors[edit] Republican senators Consular Tribunes Decemviri Dictators Imperial senators Emperor serving as consul 6th century BC (509–501)[edit] Unless otherwise indicated, the names and dates of the consuls between 509 and 81 BC are taken from Thomas Broughton's The Magistrates of the Roman Republic. Year Consul prior Consul posterior 509[18] L. Junius Brutus L. Tarquinius Collatinus suff. Sp. Lucretius Tricipitinus P. Valerius Poplicola suff. M. Horatius Pulvillus 508 P. Valerius Poplicola II T. Lucretius Tricipitinus 507 P. Valerius Poplicola III M. Horatius Pulvillus II[19] 506 Sp. Lartius (Rufus or Flavus) T. Herminius Aquilinus[20] 505 M. Valerius Volusus P. Postumius Tubertus 504 P. Valerius Poplicola IV T. Lucretius Tricipitinus II 503 Agrippa Menenius Lanatus P. Postumius Tubertus II 502 Opet. Verginius Tricostus Sp. Cassius Viscellinus 501 Post. Cominius Auruncus T. Lartius (Flavus or Rufus) 5th century BC (500–401)[edit] Year Consul prior Consul posterior 500 Ser. Sulpicius Camerinus Cornutus M'. Tullius Longus 499 T. Aebutius Elva C. Veturius Geminus Cicurinus 498 Q. Cloelius Siculus T. Lartius (Flavus or Rufus) II 497 A. Sempronius Atratinus I M. Minucius Augurinus I 496 A. Postumius Albus Regillensis T. Verginius Tricostus Caeliomontanus 495 Ap. Claudius Sabinus Regillensis P. Servilius Priscus Structus 494 A. Verginius Tricostus Caeliomontanus T. Veturius Geminus Cicurinus 494 Dictator: M'. Valerius Maximus 493 Post. Cominius Auruncus II Sp. Cassius Viscellinus II 492 T. Geganius Macerinus P. Minucius Augurinus 491 M. Minucius Augurinus II A. Sempronius Atratinus II 490 Q. Sulpicius Camerinus Cornutus Sp. Lartius (Rufus or Flavus) II[21] 489 C. Julius Iulus P. Pinarius Mamercinus Rufus 488 Sp. Nautius Rutilus Sex. Furius Medullinus Tuscus 487 T. Sicinius (Sabinus?) C. Aquillius (Tuscus?) 486 Sp. Cassius Viscellinus III Proculus Verginius Tricostus Rutilus 485 Q. Fabius Vibulanus[22] Ser. Cornelius Maluginensis[22] 484 L. Aemilius Mamercus K. Fabius Vibulanus I 483 M. Fabius Vibulanus I L. Valerius Potitus I 482 Q. Fabius Vibulanus II[22] C. Julius Iulus[22] 481 K. Fabius Vibulanus II Sp. Furius Medullinus Fusus 480 M. Fabius Vibulanus II[22] Cn. Manlius Cincinnatus[22] 479 K. Fabius Vibulanus III T. Verginius Tricostus Rutilus 478 L. Aemilius Mamercus II C. Servilius Structus Ahala[23] suff. Opet. Verginius Tricostus Esquilinus[24] 477 C. Horatius Pulvillus T. Menenius Lanatus[25] 476 A. Verginius Tricostus Rutilus Sp. Servilius Structus 475 P. Valerius Poplicola C. Nautius Rutilus 474 L. Furius Medullinus Fusus[22] Cn. Manlius Vulso[22] 473 L. Aemilius Mamercus III Vop. Julius Iulus[26] 472 L. Pinarius Mamercinus Rufus P. Furius Medullinus Fusus 471 Ap. Claudius Sabinus Regillensis T. Quinctius Capitolinus Barbatus 470 L. Valerius Potitus II Ti. Aemilius Mamercus 469 T. Numicius Priscus A. Verginius Caeliomontanus 468 T. Quinctius Capitolinus Barbatus II Q. Servilius Structus Priscus 467 Ti. Aemilius Mamercus II Q. Fabius Vibulanus 466 Sp. Postumius Albinus Regillensis Q. Servilius Structus Priscus Structus II 465 Q. Fabius Vibulanus II T. Quinctius Capitolinus Barbatus III 464 A. Postumius Albinus Regillensis Sp. Furius Medullinus Fusus 463 P. Servilius Priscus L. Aebutius Elva 462 L. Lucretius Tricipitinus T. Veturius Geminus Cicurinus 461 P. Volumnius Amintinus Gallus Ser. Sulpicius Camerinus Cornutus 460 P. Valerius Poplicola II C. Claudius Inregillensis Sabinus suff. L. Quinctius Cincinnatus 459 Q. Fabius Vibulanus III L. Cornelius Maluginensis Uritinus 458 C. Nautius Rutilus II L. Minucius Esquilinus Augurinus[27] 458 Dictator: L. Quinctius 457 C. Horatius Pulvillus II Q. Minucius Esquilinus[28] 456 M. Valerius Maximus Lactuca Sp. Verginius Tricostus Caeliomontanus 455 T. Romilius Rocus Vaticanus C. Veturius Cicurinus 454 Sp. Tarpeius Montanus Capitolinus A. Aternius Varus Fontinalis 453 Sex. Quinctilius Varus P. Curiatius Fistus Trigeminus suff. Sp. Furius Medullinus Fusus II 452 P. Sestius Capitolinus Vaticanus T. Menenius Lanatus 451[29] Ap. Claudius Crassus Sabinus Regillensis T. Genucius Augurinus First Decemvirate Ap. Claudius Crassus Sabinus Regillensis A. Manlius Vulso T. Genucius Augurinus Ser. Sulpicius Camerinus Cornutus[30] Veturius Geminus Cicurinus[31] P. Curiatius Fistus Trigeminus P. Sestius Capitolinus Vaticanus T. Romilius Rocus Vaticanus C. Julius Iulus Sp. Postumius Albus Regillensis 450 Second Decemvirate Ap. Claudius Crassus Sabinus Regillensis II Q. Poetelius Libo Visolus M. Cornelius Maluginensis T. Antonius Merenda L. (?) Sergius Esquilinus[32] K. Duillius L. Minucius Esquilinus Augurinus Sp. Oppius Cornicen Q. Fabius Vibulanus M'. Rabuleius 449 Second Decemvirate (continued) Ap. Claudius Crassus Sabinus Regillensis III Q. Poetelius Libo Visolus II M. Cornelius Maluginensis II T. Antonius Merenda II L. (?) Sergius Esquilinus II K. Duillius II L. Minucius Esquilinus Augurinus II Sp. Oppius Cornicen II Q. Fabius Vibulanus II M'. Rabuleius II L. Valerius Potitus M. Horatius (Tu?)rrinus Barbatus 448 Lars Herminius Aquilinus T. Verginius Tricostus Caeliomontanus 447 M. Geganius Macerinus C. Julius Iulus 446 T. Quinctius Capitolinus Barbatus IV[22] Agrippa Furius Fusus[22] 445 M. Genucius Augurinus C. Curtius Philo 444 Consular Tribunes A. Sempronius Atratinus T. Cloelius Siculus L. Atilius Luscus suff. L. Papirius Mugillanus L. Sempronius Atratinus[33] 443 M. Geganius Macerinus II T. Quinctius Capitolinus Barbatus V 442 M. Fabius Vibulanus Post. Aebutius Elva Cornicen 441 C. Furius Pacilus Fusus M'. Papirius Crassus 440 Proc. Geganius Macerinus Menenius Lanatus II[34] 439 T. Quinctius Capitolinus Barbatus VI[22] Agrippa Menenius Lanatus[22] 439 Dictator: L. Quinctius Cincinnatus 438 Consular Tribunes Mam. Aemilius Macerinus L. Julius Iulus L. Quinctius Cincinnatus 437 M. Geganius Macerinus III L. Sergius Fidenas suff. M. Valerius Lactuca Maximus 436 L. Papirius Crassus M. Cornelius Maluginensis 435 C. Julius Iulus II L. Verginius Tricostus 434 M. Manlius Capitolinus Q. Sulpicius Camerinus Praetextatus[35] 433 Consular Tribunes M. Fabius Vibulanus L. Sergius Fidenas M. Folius Flaccinator 432 Consular Tribunes L. Pinarius Mamercinus Sp. Postumius Albus Regillensis L. Furius Medullinus 431 T. Quinctius Poenus Cincinnatus C. Julius Mento 430 L. Papirius Crassus II[36] L. Julius Iulus 429 Hostus Lucretius Tricipitinus L. Sergius Fidenas II 428 A. Cornelius Cossus T. Quinctius Poenus Cincinnatus II[37] 427 C. Servilius Structus Ahala L. Papirius Mugillanus 426 Consular Tribunes T. Quinctius Poenus Cincinnatus M. Postumius Albinus Regillensis C. Furius Pacilus Fusus A. Cornelius Cossus 425 Consular Tribunes A. Sempronius Atratinus L. Furius Medullinus II L. Quinctius Cincinnatus II L. Horatius Barbatus 424 Consular Tribunes Ap. Claudius Crassus L. Sergius Fidenas II Sp. Nautius Rutilus[38] Sex. Julius Iulus 423 C. Sempronius Atratinus Q. Fabius Vibulanus 422 Consular Tribunes L. Manlius Capitolinus L. Papirius Mugillanus Q. Antonius Merenda 421 T. Quinctius Capitolinus Barbatus Cn. Fabius Vibulanus[39] 420 Consular Tribunes Quinctius Cincinnatus[40] M. Manlius Vulso L. Furius Medullinus III A. Sempronius Atratinus II 419 Consular Tribunes Agrippa Menenius Lanatus Sp. Nautius Rutilus P. Lucretius Tricipitinus C. Servilius Axilla 418 Consular Tribunes L. Sergius Fidenas III C. Servilius Axilla II M. Papirius Mugillanus 417 Consular Tribunes P. Lucretius Tricipitinus II Agrippa Menenius Lanatus II Sp. Veturius Crassus[41] C. Servilius Axilla III 416 Consular Tribunes A. Sempronius Atratinus III Q. Fabius Vibulanus M. Papirius Mugillanus II Sp. Nautius Rutilus II 415 Consular Tribunes P. Cornelius Cossus N. Fabius Vibulanus C. Valerius Potitus Volusus Q. Quinctius Cincinnatus 414 Consular Tribunes Cn. Cornelius Cossus Q. Fabius Vibulanus II L. Valerius Potitus P. Postumius Albinus Regillensis 413 L. Furius Medullinus[22] A. Cornelius Cossus II[22] 412 Q. Fabius Vibulanus Ambustus C. Furius Pacilus 411 M. Papirius Atratinus[42] Sp. Nautius Rutilus 410 M'. Aemilius Mamercinus C. Valerius Potitus Volusus 409 Cn. Cornelius Cossus L. Furius Medullinus II 408 Consular Tribunes C. Julius Iulus C. Servilius Ahala P. Cornelius Cossus 407 Consular Tribunes L. Furius Medullinus N. Fabius Vibulanus II C. Valerius Potitus Volusus II C. Servilius Ahala II 406 Consular Tribunes P. Cornelius Rutilus Cossus N. Fabius Ambustus Cn. Cornelius Cossus L. Valerius Potitus II 405 Consular Tribunes T. Quinctius Capitolinus Barbatus A. Manlius Vulso Capitolinus Q. Quinctius Cincinnatus II L. Furius Medullinus II C. Julius Iulus II M'. Aemilius Mamercinus 404 Consular Tribunes C. Valerius Potitus Volusus III Cn. Cornelius Cossus II M'. Sergius Fidenas K. Fabius Ambustus[43] P. Cornelius Maluginensis Sp. Nautius Rutilus III 403[44] Consular Tribunes M'. Aemilius Mamercinus II M. Quinctilius Varus L. Valerius Potitus III L. Julius Iulus Ap. Claudius Crassus Inregillensis M. Furius Fusus 402 Consular Tribunes C. Servilius Ahala III Q. Sulpicius Camerinus Cornutus Q. Servilius Fidenas A. Manlius Vulso Capitolinus II L. Verginius Tricostus Esquilinus M'. Sergius Fidenas II 401 Consular Tribunes L. Valerius Potitus IV Cn. Cornelius Cossus III M. Furius Camillus K. Fabius Ambustus II M'. Aemilius Mamercinus III L. Julius Iulus 4th century BC (400–301)[edit] Year Consul prior Consul posterior 400 Consular Tribunes P. Licinius Calvus Esquilinus P. Maelius Capitolinus P. Manlius Vulso Sp. Furius Medullinus L. Titinius Pansa Saccus L. Publilius Philo Vulscus 399 Consular Tribunes Cn. Genucius Augurinus C. Duillius Longus L. Atilius Priscus M. Veturius Crassus Cicurinus M. Pomponius Rufus Volero Publilius Philo 398 Consular Tribunes L. Valerius Potitus V L. Furius Medullinus III M. Valerius Lactucinus Maximus Q. Servilius Fidenas II M. Furius Camillus II Q. Sulpicius Camerinus Cornutus II 397 Consular Tribunes L. Julius Iulus II A. Postumius Albinus Regillensis L. Furius Medullinus IV P. Cornelius Maluginensis L. Sergius Fidenas A. Manlius Vulso Capitolinus III 396 Consular Tribunes L. Titinius Pansa Saccus II Q. Manlius Vulso Capitolinus P. Licinius Calvus Esquilinus II Cn. Genucius Augurinus II P. Maelius Capitolinus II L. Atilius Priscus II 395 Consular Tribunes P. Cornelius Cossus L. Furius Medullinus V P. Cornelius Scipio Q. Servilius Fidenas III K. Fabius Ambustus III M. Valerius Lactucinus Maximus II 394 Consular Tribunes M. Furius Camillus III L. Valerius Poplicola L. Furius Medullinus VI Sp. Postumius Albinus Regillensis C. Aemilius Mamercinus P. Cornelius II[45] 393 L. Valerius Potitus Ser. Cornelius Maluginensis suff.[46] L. Lucretius Tricipitinus Flavus Ser. Sulpicius Camerinus 392 L. Valerius Potitus II M. Manlius Capitolinus 391 Consular Tribunes L. Lucretius Tricipitinus Flavus L. Furius Medullinus VII Ser. Sulpicius Camerinus Agrippa Furius Fusus L. Aemilius Mamercinus[47] C. Aemilius Mamercinus II 390 Consular Tribunes Q. Fabius Ambustus Q. Sulpicius Longus K. Fabius Ambustus IV Q. Servilius Fidenas IV N. Fabius Ambustus II P. Cornelius Maluginensis IV 389 Consular Tribunes L. Valerius Poplicola II A. Manlius Capitolinus L. Verginius Tricostus Esquilinus (II?) L. Aemilius Mamercinus II P. Cornelius L. Postumius Albinus Regillensis 388 Consular Tribunes T. Quinctius Cincinnatus Capitolinus Q. Servilius Fidenas V L. Julius Iulus L. Aquillius Corvus L. Lucretius Tricipitinus Flavus II Ser. Sulpicius Rufus 387 Consular Tribunes[48] L. Papirius Cursor Cn. Sergius Fidenas Coxo L. Aemilius Mamercinus III Licinus Menenius Lanatus L. Valerius Poplicola III 386 Consular Tribunes M. Furius Camillus IV Ser. Cornelius Maluginensis Q. Servilius Fidenas VI L. Quinctius Cincinnatus L. Horatius Pulvillus P. Valerius Potitus Poplicola 385 Consular Tribunes A. Manlius Capitolinus II P. Cornelius T. Quinctius (Cincinnatus?) Capitolinus II L. Papirius Cursor II L. Quinctius Capitolinus Cn. Sergius Fidenas Coxo II 384 Consular Tribunes Ser. Cornelius Maluginensis II P. Valerius Potitus Poplicola II M. Furius Camillus V Ser. Sulpicius Rufus II C. Papirius Crassus T. Quinctius Cincinnatus Capitolinus III 383 Consular Tribunes L. Valerius Poplicola IV A. Manlius Capitolinus IV Ser. Sulpicius Rufus III L. Lucretius Tricipitinus Flavus III L. Aemilius Mamercinus IV M. Trebonius 382 Consular Tribunes Sp. Papirius Crassus L. Papirius Mugillanus Ser. Cornelius Maluginensis III Q. Servilius Fidenas C. Sulpicius Camerinus L. Aemilius Mamercinus V 381 Consular Tribunes M. Furius Camillus VI A. Postumius Albinus Regillensis II L. Postumius Albinus Regillensis II L. Furius Medullinus L. Lucretius Tricipitinus Flavus IV M. Fabius Ambustus 380 Consular Tribunes[49] L. Valerius Potitus Poplicola V P. Valerius Potitus Poplicola III Ser. Cornelius Maluginensis IV Licinus Menenius Lanatus II C. Sulpicius Peticus L. Aemilius Mamercinus VI Cn. Sergius Fidenas Coxo III Ti. Papirius Crassus L. Papirius Mugillanus II 379 Consular Tribunes P. Manlius Capitolinus Cn. Manlius Vulso L. Julius Iulus II C. Sextilius M. Albinius L. Antistius P. Trebonius[50] C. Erenucius[50] 378 Consular Tribunes Sp. Furius Medullinus Q. Servillius Fidenas II Licinus Menenius Lanatus III P. Cloelius Siculus M. Horatius[51] L. Geganius Macerinus[51] 377 Consular Tribunes L. Aemilius Mamercinus P. Valerius Potitus Poplicola IV C. Veturius Crassus Cicurinus Ser. Sulpicius Rufus IV or: Ser. Sulpicius Praetextatus L. Quinctius Cincinnatus III C. Quinctius Cincinnatus 376 Consular Tribunes L. Papirius Mugillanus III Licinus Menenius Lanatus IV Ser. Cornelius Maluginensis V Ser. Sulpicius Praetextatus II 375– 371 solitudo magistratuum According to Livy (6.35), the tribunes Gaius Licinius Stolo and Lucius Sextius introduced new laws known as the Lex Licinia Sextia, which provoked strong resistance from the patricians. Licinius Stolo and Sextius resorted to using the tribunican veto to prevent either consuls or consular tribunes from being elected.The actual length of this period is controversial, with primary sources stating it was one (Diodorus Siculus), five (Fasti Capitolini), or ten (Livy) years.[52] 370 Consular Tribunes A. Manlius Capitolinus V L. Furius Medullinus II Ser. Sulpicius Praetextatus III Ser. Cornelius Maluginensis VI P. Valerius Potitus Poplicola V C. Valerius Potitus 369 Consular Tribunes Q. Servilius Fidenas III C. Veturius Crassus Cicurinus II A. Cornelius Cossus M. Cornelius Maluginensis Q. Quinctius Cincinnatus M. Fabius Ambustus II 368 Consular Tribunes Ser. Cornelius Maluginensis VII Ser. Sulpicius Praetextatus IV Sp. Servilius Structus T. Quinctius Cincinnatus Capitolinus L. Papirius Crassus L. Veturius Crassus Cicurinus 367 Consular Tribunes A. Cornelius Cossus II M. Cornelius Maluginensis II M. Geganius Macerinus P. Manlius Capitolinus II L. Veturius Crassus Cicurinus II P. Valerius Potitus Poplicola VI 366 L. Aemilius Mamercinus L. Sextius Sextinus Lateranus (first plebeian) 365 L. Genucius Aventinensis Q. Servilius Ahala 364 C. Sulpicius Peticus C. Licinius Calvus[53] 363 L. Aemilius Mamercinus II Cn. Genucius Aventinensis 362 Q. Servilius Ahala II L. Genucius Aventinensis II 361 C. Sulpicius Peticus II[22] C. Licinius Stolo[53][22] 360 M. Fabius Ambustus I C. Poetelius Libo Visolus 359 M. Popillius Laenas Cn. Manlius Capitolinus Imperiosus 358 C. Fabius Ambustus C. Plautius Proculus 357 C. Marcius Rutilus Cn. Manlius Capitolinus Imperiosus II 356 M. Fabius Ambustus II M. Popillius Laenas II 355 C. Sulpicius Peticus III M. Valerius Poplicola 354 M. Fabius Ambustus III T. Quinctius Poenus Capitolinus Crispinus[54] 353 C. Sulpicius Peticus IV M. Valerius Poplicola II 352 P. Valerius Poplicola C. Marcius Rutilus II 351 C. Sulpicius Peticus V T. Quinctius Pennus Capitolinus Crispinus II 350 M. Popillius Laenas III L. Cornelius Scipio 349 L. Furius Camillus Ap. Claudius Crassus Inregillensis[55] 348 M. Valerius (Maximus) Corvus I[22] M. Popillius Laenas IV[22] 347 T. Manlius Imperiosus Torquatus I[22] C. Plautius Venno (or Venox)[22] 346 M. Valerius (Maximus) Corvus II C. Poetelius Libo Visolus II 345 M. Fabius Dorsuo Ser. Sulpicius Camerinus Rufus 344 C. Marcius Rutilus III T. Manlius Imperiosus Torquatus II 343 A. Cornelius Cossus Arvina M. Valerius (Maximus) Corvus III 342 C. Marcius Rutilus IV[22] Q. Servilius Ahala III[22] 341 C. Plautius Venno (or Venox) II L. Aemilius Mamercinus Privernas 340 T. Manlius Imperiosus Torquatus III P. Decius Mus 339 Ti. Aemilius Mamercinus Q. Publilius Philo 338 L. Furius Camillus C. Maenius 337 C. Sulpicius Longus[22] P. Aelius Paetus[22] 336 L. Papirius Crassus K. Duillius 335 M. Valerius (Maximus) Corvus IV[22] M. Atilius Regulus Calenus[22] 334 Sp. Postumius Albinus (Caudinus) T. Veturius Calvinus 333 Dictator: P. Cornelius Rufinus[56] 332 A. Cornelius Cossus Arvina II[22] Cn. Domitius Calvinus[22] 331 M. Claudius Marcellus[22] C. Valerius Potitus[22] 330 L. Papirius Crassus II L. Plautius Venno (or Venox) 329 L. Aemilius Mamercinus Privernas II C. Plautius Decianus 328[57] Plautius P. Cornelius 327 L. Cornelius Lentulus Q. Publilius Philo II 326 C. Poetelius Libo Visolus III L. Papirius Cursor 325 L. Furius Camillus II D. Junius Brutus Scaeva 324 Dictator: L. Papirius Cursor[56] 323 C. Sulpicius Longus II Q. Aulius Cerretanus[58] 322 Q. Fabius Maximus Rullianus I[22] L. Fulvius Curvus[22] 321 T. Veturius Calvinus II Sp. Postumius Albinus Caudinus II 320 Q. Publilius Philo III[22] L. Papirius Cursor II[22] 319 L. Papirius Cursor III[59] Q. Aulius Cerretanus II 318 M. Folius Flaccinator[22] L. Plautius Venno (or Venox)[22] 317 C. Junius Bubulcus Brutus[22] Q. Aemilius Barbula[22] 316 Sp. Nautius Rutilus M. Popillius Laenas 315 L. Papirius Cursor IV Q. Publilius Philo IV 314 M. Poetelius Libo C. Sulpicius Longus III 313 L. Papirius Cursor V C. Junius Bubulcus Brutus II 312 M. Valerius Maximus (Corvinus) I P. Decius Mus I 311 C. Junius Bubulcus Brutus III Q. Aemilius Barbula II 310 Q. Fabius Maximus Rullianus II C. Marcius Rutilus Censorinus 309 Dictator: L. Papirius Cursor[56] 308 Q. Fabius Maximus Rullianus III[22] P. Decius Mus II[22] 307 Ap. Claudius Caecus I L. Volumnius Flamma Violens I 306 P. Cornelius Arvina I[22] Q. Marcius Tremulus I[22] 305 L. Postumius Megellus I Ti. Minucius Augurinus suff. M. Fulvius Curvus Paetinus 304 P. Sempronius Sophus P. Sulpicius Saverrio 303 L. Genucius Aventinensis[22] Ser. Cornelius Lentulus[22] 302 M. Livius Denter M. Aemilius Paullus 301 Dictator: M. Valerius Maximus Corvus[56] 3rd century BC (300–201)[edit] Year Consul prior Consul posterior 300 M. Valerius Maximus Corvus V Q. Appuleius Pansa 299 M. Fulvius Paetinus T. Manlius Torquatus suff. M. Valerius Maximus Corvus VI 298 L. Cornelius Scipio Barbatus Cn. Fulvius Maximus Centumalus 297 Q. Fabius Maximus Rullianus IV P. Decius Mus III 296 Ap. Claudius Caecus II L. Volumnius Flamma Violens II 295 Q. Fabius Maximus Rullianus V P. Decius Mus IV 294 L. Postumius Megellus II M. Atilius Regulus 293 L. Papirius Cursor I Sp. Carvilius Maximus I 292 Q. Fabius Maximus Gurges I D. Junius Brutus Scaeva 291 L. Postumius Megellus III C. Junius Bubulcus Brutus I 290 P. Cornelius Rufinus I[22] M'. Curius Dentatus I[22] 289 M. Valerius Maximus Corvinus II Q. Caedicius Noctua 288 Q. Marcius Tremulus II P. Cornelius Arvina II 287 M. Claudius Marcellus C. Nautius Rutilus 286 M. Valerius Maximus Potitus[60] C. Aelius Paetus 285 C. Claudius Canina I M. Aemilius Lepidus 284 C. Servilius Tucca L. Caecilius Metellus Denter 283 P. Cornelius Dolabella Cn. Domitius Calvinus Maximus 282 C. Fabricius Luscinus I Q. Aemilius Papus I 281 L. Aemilius Barbula Q. Marcius Philippus 280 P. Valerius Laevinus Ti. Coruncanius 279 P. Sulpicius Saverrio P. Decius Mus 278 C. Fabricius Luscinus II Q. Aemilius Papus II 277 P. Cornelius Rufinus II C. Junius Bubulcus Brutus II 276 Q. Fabius Maximus Gurges II C. Genucius Clepsina I 275 M'. Curius Dentatus II L. Cornelius Lentulus Caudinus 274 Ser. Cornelius Merenda[22] M'. Curius Dentatus III[22] 273 C. Fabius Licinus C. Claudius Canina II 272 L. Papirius Cursor II Sp. Carvilius Maximus II 271 K. Quinctius Claudus L. Genucius Clepsina 270 C. Genucius Clepsina II Cn. Cornelius Blasio 269 Q. Ogulnius Gallus C. Fabius Pictor 268 P. Sempronius Sophus Ap. Claudius Russus 267 M. Atilius Regulus I L. Julius Libo 266 D. Junius Pera N. Fabius Pictor 265 Q. Fabius Maximus Gurges L. Mamilius Vitulus 264 Ap. Claudius Caudex M. Fulvius Flaccus 263 M'. Valerius Maximus Mesalla M'. Otacilius Crassus I 262 L. Postumius Megellus Q. Mamilius Vitulus 261 L. Valerius Flaccus T. Otacilius Crassus 260 Cn. Cornelius Scipio Asina I C. Duilius 259 L. Cornelius Scipio C. Aquillius Florus 258 A. Atilius Calatinus I C. Sulpicius Paterculus 257 Cn. Cornelius Blasio II[22] C. Atilius Regulus I[22] 256 L. Manlius Vulso Longus I Q. Caedicius suff. M. Atilius Regulus II 255 Ser. Fulvius Paetinus Nobilior[22] M. Aemilius Paullus[22] 254 Cn. Cornelius Scipio Asina II A. Atilius Calatinus II 253 Cn. Servilius Caepio C. Sempronius Blaesus 252 C. Aurelius Cotta I P. Servilius Geminus I 251 L. Caecilius Metellus I C. Furius Pacilus 250 C. Atilius Regulus II L. Manlius Vulso Longus II 249 P. Claudius Pulcher L. Junius Pullus 248 C. Aurelius Cotta II P. Servilius Geminus II 247 L. Caecilius Metellus II N. Fabius Buteo 246 M'. Otacilius Crassus II M. Fabius Licinus 245 M. Fabius Buteo C. Atilius Bulbus I 244 A. Manlius Torquatus Atticus I C. Sempronius Blaesus II 243 C. Fundanius Fundulus C. Sulpicius Galus 242 C. Lutatius Catulus A. Postumius Albinus 241 A. Manlius Torquatus Atticus II Q. Lutatius Cerco 240 C. Claudius Centho M. Sempronius Tuditanus 239 C. Mamilius Turrinus Q. Valerius Falto 238 Ti. Sempronius Gracchus P. Valerius Falto 237 L. Cornelius Lentulus Caudinus Q. Fulvius Flaccus I 236 P. Cornelius Lentulus Caudinus C. Licinius Varus 235 T. Manlius Torquatus I C. Atilius Bulbus II 234 L. Postumius Albinus I Sp. Carvilius Maximus Ruga I 233 Q. Fabius Maximus Verrucosus I M'. Pomponius Matho 232 M. Aemilius Lepidus M. Publicius Malleolus 231 M. Pomponius Matho C. Papirius Maso 230 M. Aemilius Barbula M. Junius Pera 229 L. Postumius Albinus II Cn. Fulvius Centumalus 228 Q. Fabius Maximus Verrucosus II[22] Sp. Carvilius Maximus Ruga II[22] 227 P. Valerius Flaccus M. Atilius Regulus I 226 M. Valerius Maximus Messalla L. Apustius Fullo 225 L. Aemilius Papus C. Atilius Regulus 224 T. Manlius Torquatus II Q. Fulvius Flaccus II 223 C. Flaminius I P. Furius Philus 222 M. Claudius Marcellus I[22] Cn. Cornelius Scipio Calvus[22] 221 P. Cornelius Scipio Asina M. Minucius Rufus 220[61] M. Valerius Laevinus Q. Mucius Scaevola Q. Lutatius Catulus L. Veturius Philo 219 L. Aemilius Paullus I M. Livius (Salinator) I 218 P. Cornelius Scipio Ti. Sempronius Longus 217 Cn. Servilius Geminus C. Flaminius II 217 Dictator: Q. Fabius Maximus Verrucosus III suff. M. Atilius Regulus II 216 L. Aemilius Paullus II C. Terentius Varro 215 Ti. Sempronius Gracchus I L. Postumius Albinus III[62] suff. M. Claudius Marcellus II[63] suff. Q. Fabius Maximus Verrucosus III 214 Q. Fabius Maximus Verrucosus IV M. Claudius Marcellus III 213 Q. Fabius Maximus Ti. Sempronius Gracchus II 212 Q. Fulvius Flaccus III[22] Ap. Claudius Pulcher[22] 211 Cn. Fulvius Centumalus Maximus[22] P. Sulpicius Galba Maximus I[22] 210 M. Claudius Marcellus IV[22] M. Valerius Laevinus[22] 209 Q. Fabius Maximus Verrucosus V Q. Fulvius Flaccus IV 208 M. Claudius Marcellus V T. Quinctius Crispinus 207 C. Claudius Nero M. Livius Salinator II 206 L. Veturius Philo Q. Caecilius Metellus 205 P. Cornelius Scipio (Africanus) I P. Licinius Crassus Dives 204 M. Cornelius Cethegus P. Sempronius Tuditanus 203 Cn. Servilius Caepio C. Servilius Geminus 202 Ti. Claudius Nero M. Servilius Pulex Geminus 201 Cn. Cornelius Lentulus P. Aelius Paetus 2nd century BC (200–101)[edit] Year Consul prior Consul posterior 200 P. Sulpicius Galba Maximus II C. Aurelius Cotta 199 L. Cornelius Lentulus P. Villius Tappulus 198 T. Quinctius Flamininus Sex. Aelius Paetus Catus 197 C. Cornelius Cethegus Q. Minucius Rufus 196 L. Furius Purpureo M. Claudius Marcellus 195 L. Valerius Flaccus[22] M. Porcius Cato[22] 194 P. Cornelius Scipio Africanus II Ti. Sempronius Longus 193 L. Cornelius Merula Q. Minucius Thermus 192 L. Quinctius Flamininus Cn. Domitius Ahenobarbus 191 P. Cornelius Scipio Nasica[22] M'. Acilius Glabrio[22] 190 L. Cornelius Scipio Asiaticus C. Laelius 189 M. Fulvius Nobilior[22] Cn. Manlius Vulso[22] 188 C. Livius Salinator M. Valerius Messalla 187 M. Aemilius Lepidus I C. Flaminius 186 Sp. Postumius Albinus Q. Marcius Philippus I 185 Ap. Claudius Pulcher M. Sempronius Tuditanus 184 P. Claudius Pulcher L. Porcius Licinus 183 M. Claudius Marcellus[22] Q. Fabius Labeo[22] 182 L. Aemilius Paullus Macedonicus I Cn. Baebius Tamphilus 181 P. Cornelius Cethegus M. Baebius Tamphilus 180 A. Postumius Albinus Luscus C. Calpurnius Piso suff. Q. Fulvius Flaccus 179 Q. Fulvius Flaccus[22] L. Manlius Acidinus Fulvianus[22] 178 M. Junius Brutus A. Manlius Vulso 177 C. Claudius Pulcher Ti. Sempronius Gracchus I 176 Cn. Cornelius Scipio Hispallus Q. Petillius Spurinus suff. C. Valerius Laevinus 175 M. Aemilius Lepidus II[22] P. Mucius Scaevola[22] 174 Sp. Postumius Albinus Paullulus Q. Mucius Scaevola 173 L. Postumius Albinus M. Popillius Laenas 172 C. Popillius Laenas I P. Aelius Ligus 171 P. Licinius Crassus C. Cassius Longinus 170 A. Hostilius Mancinus A. Atilius Serranus 169 Q. Marcius Philippus II Cn. Servilius Caepio 168 L. Aemilius Paullus Macedonicus II C. Licinius Crassus 167 Q. Aelius Paetus M. Junius Pennus 166 M. Claudius Marcellus I[22] C. Sulpicius Galus[22] 165 Cn. Octavius[22] T. Manlius Torquatus[22] 164 A. Manlius Torquatus Q. Cassius Longinus 163 Ti. Sempronius Gracchus II M'. Juventius Thalna 162 P. Cornelius Scipio Nasica Corculum I C. Marcius Figulus I suff. P. Cornelius Lentulus Cn. Domitius Ahenobarbus 161 M. Valerius Messalla C. Fannius Strabo 160 L. Anicius Gallus M. Cornelius Cethegus 159 Cn. Cornelius Dolabella M. Fulvius Nobilior 158 M. Aemilius Lepidus C. Popillius Laenas II 157 Sex. Julius Caesar L. Aurelius Orestes 156 L. Cornelius Lentulus Lupus C. Marcius Figulus II 155 P. Cornelius Scipio Nasica Corculum II M. Claudius Marcellus II 154 Q. Opimius L. Postumius Albinus suff. M'. Acilius Glabrio 153 Q. Fulvius Nobilior T. Annius Luscus 152 M. Claudius Marcellus III L. Valerius Flaccus 151 L. Licinius Lucullus A. Postumius Albinus 150 T. Quinctius Flamininus M'. Acilius Balbus 149 L. Marcius Censorinus M'. Manilius 148 Sp. Postumius Albinus Magnus L. Calpurnius Piso Caesoninus 147 P. Cornelius Scipio Aemilianus I C. Livius Drusus 146 Cn. Cornelius Lentulus L. Mummius Achaicus 145 Q. Fabius Maximus Aemilianus L. Hostilius Mancinus 144 Ser. Sulpicius Galba L. Aurelius Cotta 143 Ap. Claudius Pulcher Q. Caecilius Metellus Macedonicus 142 L. Caecilius Metellus Calvus Q. Fabius Maximus Servilianus 141 Cn. Servilius Caepio Q. Pompeius 140 Q. Servilius Caepio[22] C. Laelius[22] 139 Cn. Calpurnius Piso M. Popillius Laenas 138 P. Cornelius Scipio Nasica Serapio D. Junius Brutus Callaicus 137 M. Aemilius Lepidus Porcina C. Hostilius Mancinus 136 L. Furius Philus Sex. Atilius Serranus 135 Ser. Fulvius Flaccus Q. Calpurnius Piso 134 P. Cornelius Scipio Africanus Aemilianus II C. Fulvius Flaccus 133 P. Mucius Scaevola L. Calpurnius Piso Frugi 132 P. Popillius Laenas P. Rupilius 131 P. Licinius Crassus Dives Mucianus L. Valerius Flaccus 130 M. Perperna[22] L. Cornelius Lentulus[22] suff. Ap. Claudius Pulcher 129 C. Sempronius Tuditanus M'. Aquillius 128 Cn. Octavius T. Annius Rufus 127 L. Cassius Longinus Ravilla L. Cornelius Cinna 126 M. Aemilius Lepidus L. Aurelius Orestes 125 M. Plautius Hypsaeus M. Fulvius Flaccus 124 C. Cassius Longinus C. Sextius Calvinus 123 Q. Caecilius Metellus Balearicus T. Quinctius Flamininus 122 Cn. Domitius Ahenobarbus C. Fannius 121 L. Opimius Q. Fabius Maximus Allobrogicus 120 P. Manilius C. Papirius Carbo 119 L. Caecilius Metellus Delmaticus L. Aurelius Cotta 118 M. Porcius Cato Q. Marcius Rex 117 L. Caecilius Metellus Diadematus Q. Mucius Scaevola Augur 116 C. Licinius Geta Q. Fabius Maximus Eburnus 115 M. Aemilius Scaurus M. Caecilius Metellus 114 M'. Acilius Balbus C. Porcius Cato 113 C. Caecilius Metellus Caprarius Cn. Papirius Carbo 112 M. Livius Drusus L. Calpurnius Piso Caesoninus 111 P. Cornelius Scipio Nasica L. Calpurnius Bestia 110 M. Minucius Rufus Sp. Postumius Albinus 109 Q. Caecilius Metellus (Numidicus) M. Junius Silanus 108 Ser. Sulpicius Galba M. Aurelius Scaurus 107 L. Cassius Longinus C. Marius I suff. M. Aemilius Scaurus II 106 Q. Servilius Caepio[22] C. Atilius Serranus[22] 105 P. Rutilius Rufus Cn. Mallius Maximus 104 C. Marius II C. Flavius Fimbria 103 C. Marius III L. Aurelius Orestes 102 C. Marius IV Q. Lutatius Catulus 101 C. Marius V M'. Aquillius 1st century BC (100–1)[edit] Year Consul prior Consul posterior 100[64] C. Marius VI L. Valerius Flaccus 99 M. Antonius A. Postumius Albinus 98 Q. Caecilius Metellus Nepos T. Didius 97 Cn. Cornelius Lentulus P. Licinius Crassus 96 Cn. Domitius Ahenobarbus C. Cassius Longinus 95 L. Licinius Crassus Q. Mucius Scaevola 94 C. Coelius Caldus L. Domitius Ahenobarbus 93 C. Valerius Flaccus M. Herennius 92 C. Claudius Pulcher M. Perperna 91 L. Marcius Philippus Sex. Julius Caesar 90 L. Julius Caesar P. Rutilius Lupus 89 Cn. Pompeius Strabo L. Porcius Cato 88 L. Cornelius Sulla I Q. Pompeius Rufus 87 Cn. Octavius L. Cornelius Cinna I suff. L. Cornelius Merula 86 L. Cornelius Cinna II C. Marius VII suff. L. Valerius Flaccus 85 L. Cornelius Cinna III Cn. Papirius Carbo I 84 Cn. Papirius Carbo II L. Cornelius Cinna IV 83 L. Cornelius Scipio Asiaticus C. Norbanus 82 C. Marius Cn. Papirius Carbo III 81 M. Tullius Decula Cn. Cornelius Dolabella 81 Dictator: L. Cornelius Sulla Felix 80[65] L. Cornelius Sulla Felix II Q. Caecilius Metellus Pius 79 P. Servilius Vatia Isauricus Ap. Claudius Pulcher 78 M. Aemilius Lepidus Q. Lutatius Catulus 77 D. Junius Brutus Mam. Aemilius Lepidus Livianus 76 Cn. Octavius C. Scribonius Curio 75 L. Octavius C. Aurelius Cotta 74 L. Licinius Lucullus M. Aurelius Cotta 73 M. Terentius Varro Lucullus C. Cassius Longinus 72 L. Gellius Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Clodianus 71 P. Cornelius Lentulus Sura Cn. Aufidius Orestes 70 Cn. Pompeius Magnus I M. Licinius Crassus I 69 Q. Hortensius Hortalus Q. Caecilius Metellus Creticus 68 L. Caecilius Metellus Q. Marcius Rex suff. Servilius Vatia[66] 67 C. Calpurnius Piso M'. Acilius Glabrio 66 M'. Aemilius Lepidus L. Volcatius Tullus 65[67] consules designati P. Cornelius Sulla P. Autronius Paetus L. Aurelius Cotta L. Manlius Torquatus 64 L. Julius Caesar C. Marcius Figulus 63 M. Tullius Cicero C. Antonius Hybrida 62 D. Junius Silanus L. Licinius Murena 61 M. Pupius Piso Frugi Calpurnianus M. Valerius Messalla Niger 60 Q. Caecilius Metellus Celer L. Afranius 59 C. Julius Caesar I M. Calpurnius Bibulus 58 L. Calpurnius Piso Caesoninus A. Gabinius 57 P. Cornelius Lentulus Spinther Q. Caecilius Metellus Nepos 56 Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Marcellinus L. Marcius Philippus 55 Cn. Pompeius Magnus II M. Licinius Crassus II 54 L. Domitius Ahenobarbus Ap. Claudius Pulcher 53 Cn. Domitius Calvinus I M. Valerius Messalla Rufus 52 Cn. Pompeius Magnus III Q. Caecilius Metellus Pius Scipio 51 Ser. Sulpicius Rufus M. Claudius Marcellus 50 L. Aemilius Paullus C. Claudius Marcellus 49 C. Claudius Marcellus L. Cornelius Lentulus Crus 48 C. Julius Caesar II P. Servilius Isauricus I 47 Q. Fufius Calenus P. Vatinius 46 C. Julius Caesar III M. Aemilius Lepidus I 45 C. Julius Caesar IV sine collega suff. Q. Fabius Maximus C. Trebonius suff. C. Caninius Rebilus 44 C. Julius Caesar V M. Antonius I suff. P. Cornelius Dolabella 43 C. Vibius Pansa Caetronianus A. Hirtius suff. C. Julius Caesar (Octavianus) I Q. Pedius suff. P. Ventidius Bassus C. Carrinas 42 M. Aemilius Lepidus II L. Munatius Plancus 41 L. Antonius Pietas P. Servilius Isauricus II 40 Cn. Domitius Calvinus II C. Asinius Pollio suff. L. Cornelius Balbus P. Canidius Crassus 39[68] L. Marcius Censorinus C. Calvisius Sabinus suff. P. Alfenus Varus (after October–December) suff. C. Cocceius Balbus (December) 38[68] Ap. Claudius Pulcher (January–June) C. Norbanus Flaccus (January–August) suff. L. Cornelius Lentulus (July–December) suff. L. Marcius Philippus (September–December) 37 M. Vipsanius Agrippa I L. Caninius Gallus suff. T. Statilius Taurus I 36[69] L. Gellius Poplicola (January–August) M. Cocceius Nerva (January–June) suff. Q. Marcius (July–December) suff. L. Nonius Asprenas (September–December) 35[68] L. Cornificius (January–August) Sex. Pompeius (January–June) suff. P. Cornelius Dolabella (September–December) suff. T. Peducaeus (July–December) 34[70] M. Antonius II (1 January only) L. Scribonius Libo (January–June) suff. L. Sempronius Atratinus (2 January–June) suff. Paullus Aemilius Lepidus (July–December) C. Memmius (July–August) suff. M. Herennius Picens (September–December) 33[70] Imp. Caesar divi f. II (1 January only) L. Volcacius Tullus (January–April) suff. L. Autronius Paetus (2 January–April) suff. L. Flavius (May–June or August) C. Fonteius Capito (May–June or August) suff. M. Acilius Glabrio (July–August or September) suff. L. Vinicius (September–December) suff. Q. Laronius (October–December) 32 Cn. Domitius Ahenobarbus C. Sosius suff. L. Cornelius Cinna M. Valerius Messalla 31 M. Antonius III (only in the east) Imp. Caesar divi f. III suff. M. Valerius Messalla Corvinus suff. M. Titius suff. Cn. Pompeius 30 Imp. Caesar divi f. IV M. Licinius Crassus suff. C. Antistius Vetus suff. M. Tullius Cicero suff. L. Saenius 29 Imp. Caesar divi f. V Sex. Appuleius suff. Potitus Valerius Messalla 28 Imp. Caesar divi f. VI M. Vipsanius Agrippa II 27 Imp. Caesar divi f. Augustus VII M. Vipsanius Agrippa III 26 Imp. Caesar divi f. Augustus VIII T. Statilius Taurus II 25 Imp. Caesar divi f. Augustus IX M. Junius Silanus 24 Imp. Caesar divi f. Augustus X C. Norbanus Flaccus 23[71] Imp. Caesar divi f. Augustus XI (January–June) Cn. Calpurnius Piso (January–December)[72] suff. L. Sestius Albanianus Quirinalis (July–December) 22 M. Claudius Marcellus Aeserninus L. Arruntius 21 M. Lollius Q. Aemilius Lepidus 20 M. Appuleius P. Silius Nerva 19[73] C. Sentius Saturninus (until some point between 1 August and 12 October) sine collega suff. M. Vinicius (before 12 October–December) Q. Lucretius Vespillo (before 12 October–December) 18 Publius Cornelius Lentulus Marcellinus Cn. Cornelius Lentulus 17 C. Furnius C. Junius Silanus 16 L. Domitius Ahenobarbus P. Cornelius Scipio suff. L. Tarius Rufus 15 M. Livius Drusus Libo L. Calpurnius Piso 14 M. Licinius Crassus Frugi Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Augur 13 Ti. Claudius Nero I P. Quinctilius Varus 12[74] M. Valerius Messalla Appianus (died 6 March) P. Sulpicius Quirinius (January–after 29 August) suff. C. Valgius Rufus (March–after 29 August) suff. C. Caninius Rebilus (until death in office) L. Volusius Saturninus (until December) 11 Q. Aelius Tubero Paullus Fabius Maximus 10 Africanus Fabius Maximus Iullus Antonius 9 Nero Claudius Drusus T. Quinctius Crispinus Sulpicianus 8 C. Marcius Censorinus C. Asinius Gallus 7 Ti. Claudius Nero II Cn. Calpurnius Piso 6 D. Laelius Balbus C. Antistius Vetus 5[75] Imp. Caesar divi f. Augustus XII (January–after 11 April) L. Cornelius Sulla (January–after 11 April) suff. Q. Haterius (before 1 July–December) L. Vinicius (until 16 July or 13 August) suff. C. Sulpicius Galba (until 31 December) 4 C. Calvisius Sabinus L. Passienus Rufus suff. C. Caelius (Rufus?) Galus Sulpicius 3 L. Cornelius Lentulus M. Valerius Messalla Messallinus 2[76] Imp. Caesar divi f. Augustus XIII (January–August) M. Plautius Silvanus (January–June) suff. L. Caninius Gallus (July–December) suff. C. Fufius Geminus (September–October) suff. Q. Fabricius (November–December) 1 Cossus Cornelius Lentulus (Gaetulicus) L. Calpurnius Piso suff. A. Plautius A. Caecina Severus 1st century (1–100)[edit] Year Consul prior Consul posterior 1[77] C. Caesar (January–December) L. Aemilius Paullus (January–June) suff. M. Herennius Picens (July–December) 2 P. Vinicius (January–June) P. Alfenus Varus suff. P. Cornelius Lentulus Scipio (July–December) T. Quinctius Crispinus Valerianus 3 L. Aelius Lamia (January–June) M. Servilius suff. P. Silius (July–December) L. Volusius Saturninus 4 Sex. Aelius Catus (January–June) C. Sentius Saturninus suff. Cn. Sentius Saturninus (July–December) C. Clodius Licinus 5 L. Valerius Messalla Volesus (January–June) Cn. Cornelius Cinna Magnus suff. C. Vibius Postumus (July–December) C. Ateius Capito 6 M. Aemilius Lepidus (January–December) L. Arruntius (January–June) suff. L. Nonius Asprenas (July–December) 7 Q. Caecilius Metellus Creticus Silanus (January–December) A. Licinius Nerva Silianus (January–June) suff. Lucilius Longus (July–December) 8 M. Furius Camillus (January–June) Sex. Nonius Quinctilianus suff. L. Apronius (July–December) A. Vibius Habitus 9 C. Poppaeus Sabinus (January–June) Q. Sulpicius Camerinus suff. M. Papius Mutilus (July–December) Q. Poppaeus Secundus 10 P. Cornelius Dolabella (January–June) C. Junius Silanus suff. Ser. Cornelius Lentulus Maluginensis (July–December) Q. Junius Blaesus 11 M'. Aemilius Lepidus (January–June) T. Statilius Taurus (January–December) suff. L. Cassius Longinus (July–December) 12 Germanicus Julius Caesar (January–December) C. Fonteius Capito (January–June) suff. C. Visellius Varro (July–December) 13[78] C. Silius (January–June) L. Munatius Plancus (January–December) suff. A. Caecina Largus (July–December) 14[79] Sex. Pompeius (January–December) Sex. Appuleius 15 Drusus Julius Caesar (January–December) C. Norbanus Flaccus (January–June) suff. M. Junius Silanus (July–December) 16 Sisenna Statilius Taurus (January–June) L. Scribonius Libo suff. C. Vibius Rufus (July–December) P. Pomponius Graecinus 17 L. Pomponius Flaccus (January–June) C. Caelius Rufus suff. C. Vibius Marsus (July–December) L. Voluseius Proculus 18 Ti. Caesar Augustus III (January) Germanicus Julius Caesar II (January–April) suff. L. Seius Tubero (February–July) Livineius Regulus (May–July) suff. C. Rubellius Blandus (August–December) M. Vipstanus Gallus 19 M. Junius Silanus Torquatus (January–December) L. Norbanus Balbus (January–June) suff. P. Petronius (July–December) 20 M. Valerius Messala Barbatus (January–December) M. Aurelius Cotta Maximus Messalinus 21 Ti. Caesar Augustus IV (January–June) Drusus Julius Caesar II suff. Mam. Aemilius Scaurus (July–December) Cn. Tremellius 22[80] D. Haterius Agrippa C. Sulpicius Galba suff. M. Cocceius Nerva[81] C. Vibius Rufinus[82] 23 C. Asinius Pollio (January–December) C. Antistius Vetus (January–June) suff. C. Stertinius Maximus (July–December) 24 Ser. Cornelius Cethegus (January–June) L. Visellius Varro suff. C. Calpurnius Aviola (July–December) P. Cornelius Lentulus Scipio 25 Cossus Cornelius Lentulus (January–August) M. Asinius Agrippa (January–December) suff. C. Petronius (September–December) 26 Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Gaetulicus (January–June) C. Calvisius Sabinus suff. Q. Junius Blaesus (July–December) L. Antistius Vetus 27 L. Calpurnius Piso (January–June) M. Licinius Crassus Frugi suff. P. Cornelius Lentulus (July–December) C. Sallustius Passienus Crispus 28 Ap. Junius Silanus (January–June) P. Silius Nerva suff. L. Junius Silanus (July–December) C. Vellaeus Tutor 29 C. Fufius Geminus (January–June) L. Rubellius Geminus suff. A. Plautius (July–December) L. Nonius Asprenas 30 L. Cassius Longinus (January–June) M. Vinicius suff. L. Naevius Surdinus (July–December) C. Cassius Longinus 31[83] Ti. Caesar Augustus V (January-8 May) L. Aelius Seianus suff. Faustus Cornelius Sulla (9 May–September) Sex. Tedius Valerius Catullus (9 May–June) suff. L. Fulcinius Trio (July–December) suff. P. Memmius Regulus (October–December) 32 Cn. Domitius Ahenobarbus (January–December) L. Arruntius Camillus Scribonianus (January–June) suff. A. Vitellius (July–December) 33 L. Livius Ocella Ser. Sulpicius Galba (January–June) L. Cornelius Sulla Felix suff. L. Salvius Otho (July–December) C. Octavius Laenas 34 Paullus Fabius Persicus (January–June) L. Vitellius I suff. Q. Marcius Barea Soranus (July–December) T. Rustius Nummius Gallus 35 C. Cestius Gallus (January–June) M. Servilius Nonianus suff. D. Valerius Asiaticus (July–December) A. Gabinius Secundus 36 Sex. Papinius Allenius (January–June) Q. Plautius suff. C. Vettius Rufus[84] (July–December) M. Porcius Cato 37[85] Cn. Acerronius Proculus (January–June) C. Petronius Pontius Nigrinus suff. C. Caesar Augustus Germanicus (July–August) Ti. Claudius Nero Germanicus suff. A. Caecina Paetus (September–December) C. Caninius Rebilus 38 M. Aquila Julianus (January–June) P. Nonius Asprenas Calpurnius Serranus suff. Ser. Asinius Celer (July–December) Sex. Nonius Quinctilianus 39 C. Caesar Augustus Germanicus II (January) L. Apronius Caesianus (January–June) suff. Q. Sanquinius Maximus (February–June) suff. Cn. Domitius Corbulo (July–1 September) ignotus suff. A. Didius Gallus (2 September–December) Cn. Domitius Afer 40 C. Caesar Augustus Germanicus III (To 13 January) sine collega suff. C. Laecanius Bassus (January–June) Q. Terentius Culleo 41[86] C. Caesar Augustus Germanicus IV (January) Cn. Sentius Saturninus (January–June) suff. Q. Pomponius Secundus (February–June) suff. Q. Futius Lusius Saturninus (September–October) M. Seius Varanus suff. Q. Ostorius Scapula[87] (November–December) P. Suillius Rufus 42 Ti. Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus II (January–February) C. Caecina Largus (January–December) suff. C. Cestius Gallus (March–? June) suff. Cornelius Lupus[88] 43[89] Ti. Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus III (January–February) L. Vitellius II suff. Sex. Palpellius Hister (March–July) L. Pedanius Secundus suff. A. Gabinius Secundus (August–September) ignotus suff. Q. Curtius Rufus (October–December) Sp. Oppius[90] 44[91] C. Sallustius Crispus Passienus II (early January) T. Statilius Taurus (January–June) suff. P. Calvisius Sabinus Pomponius Secundus (early January–June) 45 M. Vinicius II (January–February) T. Statilius Taurus Corvinus (January–June) suff. Ti. Plautius Silvanus Aelianus (March–June) suff. A. Antonius Rufus (July–? October) M. Pompeius Silvanus Staberius Flavianus 46 D. Valerius Asiaticus II (January–February) M. Junius Silanus (January–December) suff. Camerinus Antistius Vetus (Early March)[92] suff. Q. Sulpicius Camerinus (Early March–June) suff. D. Laelius Balbus (July–August) suff. C. Terentius Tullius Geminus (September–December) 47[93] Ti. Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus IV (January–February) L. Vitellius III suff. C. Calpetanus Rantius Sedatus (March–April) M. Hordeonius Flaccus suff. Cn. Hosidius Geta (July–December) T. Flavius Sabinus (July–August) suff. L. Vagellius (September–October) suff. C. Volasenna Severus (November–December) 48 A. Vitellius (January–June) L. Vipstanus Poplicola[94] suff. L. Vitellius (July–December) Messalla Vipstanus Gallus 49 Q. Veranius (January–February) C. Pompeius Longus Gallus suff. L. Mammius Pollio (March–June) Q. Allius Maximus 50 C. Antistius Vetus (January–? February) M. Suillius Nerullinus 51 Ti. Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus V (January–December) Ser. Cornelius Scipio Salvidienus Orfitus (January–June) suff. L. Calventius Vetus Carminius (by September–October) suff. T. Flavius Vespasianus (November–December) 52 Faustus Cornelius Sulla Felix (January–December) L. Salvius Otho Titianus I (January–June) suff. Q. Marcius Barea Soranus (Attested 10 August) suff. L. Salvidienus Rufus Salvianus (Attested 11 December) 53 D. Junius Silanus Torquatus (January–June) Q. Haterius Antoninus suff. P. Trebonius (June–? October) Q. Caecina Primus suff. P. Calvisius Ruso (? November–December) 54 M'. Acilius Aviola (January–June) M. Asinius Marcellus suff. M. Aefulanus (After June)[95] ignotus 55[96] Nero Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus (January–February) L. Antistius Vetus[97] suff. N. Cestius (March–April) suff. P. Cornelius Dolabella (May–June) L. Annaeus Seneca (until October) suff. M. Trebellius Maximus (July–August) suff. P. Palfurius (September–October) suff. Cn. Cornelius Lentulus Gaetulicus (November–December) T. Curtilius Mancia 56 Q. Volusius Saturninus (January–June) P. Cornelius (Lentulus?) Scipio suff. L. Junius Gallio Annaeanus (July–August) T. Cutius Ciltus suff. P. Sulpicius Scribonius Rufus (September–October) P. Sulpicius Scribonius Proculus suff. L. Duvius Avitus (November–December) P. Clodius Thrasea Paetus 57[98] Nero Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus II (January–December) L. Calpurnius Piso (January–June) suff. L. Caesius Martialis (July–December) 58 Nero Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus III (January–April) M. Valerius Messalla Corvinus (January–June) suff. C. Fonteius Agrippa (May–June) suff. A. Petronius Lurco (July–December) A. Paconius Sabinus 59 C. Vipstanus Apronianus (January–June) C. Fonteius Capito suff. T. Sextius Africanus (July–December) M. Ostorius Scapula 60 Nero Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus IV (January–June) Cossus Cornelius Lentulus suff. C. Velleius Paterculus (July–October) M. Manilius Vopiscus 61 P. Petronius Turpilianus (January–June) L. Junius Caesennius Paetus suff. Cn. Pedanius Fuscus Salinator (July–August) L. Velleius Paterculus 62[99] P. Marius[100] (January – April) Lucius Afinius Gallus suff. Q. Manlius Ancharius Tarquitius Saturninus (May–August) P. Petronius Niger suff. Q. Junius Marullus[101] (September–December) T. Clodius Eprius Marcellus 63 C. Memmius Regulus (January–June) L. Verginius Rufus suff. T. Petronius Niger[102] (July–August) Q. Manlius Tarquitius Saturninus 64 C. Laecanius Bassus (January–June) M. Licinius Crassus Frugi suff. C. Licinius Mucianus I (July–October) Q. Fabius Barbarus Antonius Macer 65 A. Licinius Nerva Silianus (January–June) M. Julius Vestinus Atticus (Killed self in April) suff. P. Pasidienus Firmus (Attested 18 June)[103] suff. C. Pomponius Pius (Attested 13 August) C. Anicius Cerialis 66 C. Luccius Telesinus (January–June) C. Suetonius Paullinus suff.[104] M. Annius Afrinus (July–August) C. Paccius Africanus suff. M. Arruntius Aquila (September–December) M. Vettius Bolanus 67 L. Julius Rufus (January–June) Fonteius Capito (January–May) suff. L. Aurelius Priscus (June) suff.[104] Ap. Annius Gallus (July–December) L. Verulanus Severus 68[105] Ti. Catius Asconius Silius Italicus (January–March) P. Galerius Trachalus suff. Imp. Nero Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus V (April–June) C. Luccius Telesinus II (May-June) suff. C. Bellicius Natalis (September–December) P. Cornelius Scipio Asiaticus 69[106] Ser. Galba Imp. Caesar Augustus II (Murdered 15 January) T. Vinius (Rufinus?) (Murdered 15 January) suff. M. Otho Caesar Augustus (15 January–28 February) L. Salvius Otho Titianus II suff. L. Verginius Rufus II (March) L. Pompeius Vopiscus suff. Cn. Arulenus Caelius Sabinus (April–June) T. Flavius Sabinus I suff. Cn. Arrius Antoninus (July–August) A. Marius Celsus suff. Fabius Valens (September–October) A. Caecina Alienus (September–30 October) suff. Rosius Regulus (31 October) suff. Cn. Caecilius Simplex (November−December) C. Quinctius Atticus 70[107] Imp. Caesar Vespasianus Augustus II (January–June) T. Caesar Vespasianus suff. C. Licinius Mucianus II (July–August) Q. Petillius Cerealis Caesius Rufus suff.[108] Q. Julius Cordinus C. Rutilius Gallicus (September–October) ignotus suff. L. Annius Bassus (November–December) C. Laecanius Bassus Caecina Paetus 71[109] Imp. Caesar Vespasianus Augustus III (January–February) M. Cocceius Nerva I suff. Caesar Domitianus (March–June) Cn. Pedius Cascus (March–April) suff. C. Calpetanus Rantius Quirinalis Valerius Festus (May–June) suff. L. Flavius Fimbria (July–August) C. Atilius Barbarus suff.[110] Cn. Pompeius Collega (November–December) Q. Julius Cordus 72 Imp. Caesar Vespasianus Augustus IV (January–April) T. Caesar Vespasianus II suff. C. Licinius Mucianus III (May–? June) T. Flavius Sabinus II suff. M. Ulpius Traianus[108] (September–October) suff.[111] Sex. Marcius Priscus (November–December) Cn. Pinarius Aemilius Cicatricula 73 Caesar Domitianus II (January–? February) L. Valerius Catullus Messallinus suff. L. Aelius Oculatus (May–June) Q. Gavius Atticus suff. M. Arrecinus Clemens I (July–? August) . ]m[ .....[112] suff. Sex. Julius Frontinus ignotus 74 Imp. Caesar Vespasianus Augustus V (To 13 January) T. Caesar Vespasianus III (January–April) suff. Ti. Plautius Silvanus Aelianus II (13 January–February) suff. L. Junius Q. Vibius Crispus II (March–April) suff. Q. Petillius Cerialis Caesius Rufus II (May–June) T. Clodius Eprius Marcellus II suff. ignotus (July–August) .... ]on[.[113] suff. C. Pomponius (September–October) L. Manlius Patruinus suff. Cn. Domitius Tullus[114] 75 Imp. Caesar Vespasianus Augustus VI (To 13 January or February) T. Caesar Vespasianus IV (January–February) suff. Caesar Domitianus III (13 January or March–April) suff. L. Pasidienus Firmus (March–April) 76 Imp. Caesar Vespasianus Augustus VII (To 13 January or February) T. Caesar Vespasianus V (To 13 January or February or April) suff. Caesar Domitianus IV (13 January or March–February or April) suff. L. Tampius Flavianus II (March–April or May–June) M. Pompeius Silvanus Staberius Flavianus II suff. Galeo Tettienus Petronianus (November–December) M. Fulvius Gillo 77 Imp. Caesar Vespasianus Augustus VIII (To 13 January or February) T. Caesar Vespasianus VI (January–June) suff. Caesar Domitianus V (13 January or February–June) suff. L. Pompeius Vopiscus C. Arruntius Catellius Celer (September–October) M. Arruntius Aquila suff. Cn. Julius Agricola (November–December) ignotus 78 D. Junius Novius Priscus (? Rufus) (January–April) L. Ceionius Commodus suff. Q. Corellius Rufus (September–October) L. Funisulanus Vettonianus suff. Sex. Vitulasius Nepos ignotus suff. Q. Articuleius Paetus ignotus 79 Imp. Caesar Vespasianus Augustus IX (To 13 January) T. Caesar Vespasianus VII (January–February) suff. Caesar Domitianus VI (13 January–February) suff. L. Junius Caesennius Paetus (March–June) P. Calvisius Ruso[115] suff. T. Rubrius Aelius Nepos (September–December) M. Arrius Flaccus 80 Imp. T. Caesar Vespasianus Augustus VIII (To 13 January) Caesar Domitianus VII suff. A. Didius Gallus Fabricius Veiento II (13 January–February) L. Aelius Lamia Plautius Aelianus (13 January–June) suff. Q. Aurelius Pactumeius Fronto (March–April) suff. C. Marius Marcellus Octavius Publius Cluvius Rufus (May–June) suff.[116] M. Atilius Postumus Bradua (July–August) Q. Pompeius Trio suff.[117] Sex. Neranius Capito (September–October) L. Acilius Strabo suff. M. Tittius Frugi (November–December) T. Vinicius Julianus 81 L. Flavius Silva Nonius Bassus (January–February) L. Asinius Pollio Verrucosus suff. M. Roscius Coelius (March–April) C. Julius Juvenalis suff. L. Vettius Paullus (May–June) T. Junius Montanus suff. C. Scoedius Natta Pinarius (July–August) T. Tettienus Serenus suff. L. Carminius Lusitanicus (September–October) M. Petronius Umbrinus 82 Imp. Caesar Domitianus Augustus VIII (To 13 January) T. Flavius Sabinus suff. [? Servaeus In]noc(ens) (13 January–February) L. Salvius Otho Cocceianus[117] suff. [ ... ]an(us)[118] (March–April) M'. Acilius Aviola[117] suff. [C. Arinius Mo]dest(us)[119] (May–June) ignotus suff.[120] P. Valerius Patruinus (July–August) L. Antonius Saturninus suff. M. Larcius Magnus Pompeius Silo (September–October) T. Aurelius Quietus 83[121] Imp. Caesar Domitianus Augustus IX (To 13 January) Q. Petillius Rufus[122] (January–February) suff. M. Annius Messalla (March–April) C. Fisius Sabinus suff. L. Tettius Julianus (May–June) Terentius Strabo Erucius Homullus suff. L. Calventius Sex. Carminius Vetus (September–October) M. Cornelius Nigrinus Curiatius Maternus 84 Imp. Caesar Domitianus Augustus X (To 13 January or ? February) C. Oppius Sabinus (January–February) suff. L. Julius Ursus (July–August) ignotus suff. C. Tullius Capito Pomponianus Plotius Firmus (September–October) C. Cornelius Gallicanus suff. ignotus Gallus[123] 85[124] Imp. Caesar Domitianus Augustus XI (January–February ) T. Aurelius Fulvus II suff. Q. Julius Cordinus C. Rutilius Gallicus II (March–April) L. Valerius Catullus Messallinus II suff. M. Arrecinus Clemens II (May–June) L. Baebius Honoratus suff. P. Herennius Pollio (July–August) M. Annius Herennius Pollio suff. D. Aburius Bassus (September–October) Q. Julius Balbus suff.[125] C. Salvius Liberalis Nonius Bassus (November–December) [? Cornelius] Orestes 86 Imp. Caesar Domitianus Augustus XII (To 13 January) Ser. Cornelius Dolabella Petronianus (January–February) suff. C. Secius Campanus[126] (13 January–February or April) suff. incertus (March–April)[126] Q. Vibius Secundus (March–April) suff. Sex. Octavius Fronto (May–August) Ti. Julius Candidus Marius Celsus suff. A. Bucius Lappius Maximus (September–December) C. Octavius Tidius Tossianus L. Javolenus Priscus 87 Imp. Caesar Domitianus Augustus XIII (To 13 January) L. Volusius Saturninus (January–April) suff. C. Calpurnius Piso Crassus Frugi Licinianus (13 January–April) suff. C. Bellicius Natalis Gavidius Tebanianus[127] (May–August) C. Ducenius Proculus suff. C. Cilnius Proculus (September–December) L. Neratius Priscus 88 Imp. Caesar Domitianus Augustus XIV (To 13 January) L. Minicius Rufus (January–April) suff. D. Plotius Grypus (13 January–April) suff. Q. Ninnius Hasta (May–August) L. Scribonius Libo Rupilius Frugi Bonus suff. M. Otacilius Catulus (September–December) Sex. Julius Sparsus 89 T. Aurelius Fulvus (January–April) M. Asinius Atratinus suff. P. Sallustius Blaesus (May–August) M. Peducaeus Saenianus suff. A. Vicirius Proculus (September–December) M'. Laberius Maximus 90 Imp. Caesar Domitianus Augustus XV (To 13 January) M. Cocceius Nerva II (January–February) suff. L. Cornelius Pusio Annius Messala (13 January–February) suff. L. Antistius Rusticus (March–April) Ser. Julius Servianus suff. Q. Accaeus Rufus (May–June) C. Caristanius Fronto suff. P. Baebius Italicus (July–August) C. Aquillius Proculus suff. L. Albius Pullaienus Pollio (September–October) Cn. Pinarius Aemilius Cicatricula Pompeius Longinus suff. M. Tullius Cerialis[128] (November–December) Cn. Pompeius Catullinus 91 M'. Acilius Glabrio (January–April) M. Ulpius Trajanus suff. D. Minicius Faustinus (May–August) P. Valerius Marinus suff. Q. Valerius Vegetus (September–December) P. Metilius Sabinus Nepos 92 Imp. Caesar Domitianus Augustus XVI (To 13 January) Q. Volusius Saturninus (January–April) suff. L. Venuleius Montanus Apronianus (13 January–April) suff. L. Stertinius Avitus (May–August) Ti. Julius Celsus Polemaeanus suff. C. Julius Silanus (September–December) Q. Junius Arulenus Rusticus 93[129] Sex. Pompeius Collega (January–April) Q. Peducaeus Priscinus suff.[130] T. Avidius Quietus (May–August) Sex. Lusianus Proculus suff. C. Cornelius Rarus Sextius Na(so?) (September–December) [? Tuccius Ceria]lis 94 L. Nonius Calpurnius Torquatus Asprenas (January–April) T. Sextius Magius Lateranus suff. M. Lollius Paulinus D. Valerius Asiaticus Saturninus (May–August) C. Antius A. Julius Quadratus suff. L. Silius Decianus (September–December) T. Pomponius Bassus 95 Imp. Caesar Domitianus Augustus XVII (To 13 January) T. Flavius Clemens (January–April) suff. L. Neratius Marcellus (13 January–April) suff. A. Bucius Lappius Maximus II (May–August) P. Ducenius Verus suff. Q. Pomponius Rufus (September–December) L. Baebius Tullus 96 C. Manlius Valens (January–April) C. Antistius Vetus suff. Q. Fabius Postuminus (May–August) T. Prifernius [Paetus] suff. Ti. Catius Caesius Fronto (September–December) M. Calpurnius [...]icus 97[131] Imp. Nerva Caesar Augustus III (January–February) L. Verginius Rufus III suff. Cn. Arrius Antoninus II (March–April ) (C.?) Calpurnius Piso suff. M. Annius Verus I (May–June) L. Neratius Priscus suff. L. Domitius Apollinaris (July–August ) Sex. Hermentidius Campanus suff. Q. Glitius Atilius Agricola (September–October) L. Pomponius Maternus[132] suff. P. Cornelius Tacitus (November–December) M. Ostorius Scapula[133] 98[134] Imp. Nerva Caesar Augustus IV (To 13 January) Imp. Caesar Nerva Trajanus II (January–June) suff. Cn. Domitius Afer Curvius Tullus II (13 January–31 January) suff. Sex. Julius Frontinus II (February) suff. L. Julius Ursus II (March) suff. T. Vestricius Spurinna II (April) suff. C. Pomponius Pius (May–June) suff. A. Vicirius Martialis (July–August) L. Maecius Postumus suff. C. Pomponius Rufus Acilius [Pri]scus Coelius Sparsus (September–October) Cn. Pompeius Ferox Licinianus suff.[135] Q. Fulvius Gillo Bittius Proculus (November–December) P. Julius Lupus 99 A. Cornelius Palma Frontonianus (January–?) Q. Sosius Senecio suff. P. Sulpicius Lucretius Barba (June–July) Senecio Memmius Afer suff. Q. Fabius Barbarus Valerius Magnus Julianus (August–?) A. Caecilius Faustinus suff. Ti. Julius Ferox[136] ignotus 100 Imp. Caesar Nerva Trajanus Augustus III (January) Sex. Julius Frontinus III (January–February) suff. L. Julius Ursus III (January–February) suff. M. Marcius Macer (March–April) C. Cilnius Proculus suff. L. Herennius Saturninus (May–June) Pomponius Mamilianus suff. Q. Acutius Nerva (July–August) L. Fabius Tuscus suff. C. Julius Cornutus Tertullus (September–October) C. Plinius Caecilius Secundus suff. L. Roscius Aelianus Maecius Celer (November–December) Ti. Claudius Sacerdos Julianus 2nd century (101–200)[edit] Year Consul prior Consul posterior 101[137] Imp. Caesar Nerva Trajanus Augustus IV (January) Q. Articuleius Paetus II (January–March) suff. Sex. Attius Suburanus Aemilianus (February–March) suff. C. Sertorius Brocchus Q. Servaeus Innocens (April–May) M. Maecius Celer suff. [...]us Proculus (Sometime between May and October) ignotus suff.[138] L. Arruntius Stella (Attested October) L. Julius Marinus Caecilius Simplex 102 L. Julius Ursus Servianus II (January–April) L. Licinius Sura II (January–February) suff. L. Fabius Justus (March–April) suff.[139] T. Didius Secundus (May–August) L. Publilius Celsus suff. L. Antonius Albus (September–December) M. Junius Homullus 103 Imp. Caesar Nerva Trajanus Augustus V (January) M'. Laberius Maximus II (January–March) suff. Q. Glitius Atilius Agricola II (January–March) suff. P. Metilius Nepos (April–June) Q. Baebius Macer suff. [? M. Flavius Ap]er[140] (July–September) C. Trebonius Proculus Mettius Modestus suff. (A?)nnius Mela (October–December) P. Calpurnius Macer Caulius Rufus 104 Sex. Attius Suburanus Aemilianus II M. Asinius Marcellus 105 Ti. Julius Candidus Marius Celsus II (January–March) C. Antius A. Julius Quadratus II suff. C. Julius Quadratus Bassus (May–August) Cn. Afranius Dexter (May–15 July) suff. Q. Caelius Honoratus (July–August) suff. M. Vitorius Marcellus (September–December) C. Caecilius Strabo 106 L. Ceionius Commodus Sex. Vettulenus Civica Cerialis suff. L. Minicius Natalis Q. Licinius Silvanus Granianus Quadronius Proculus 107 L. Licinius Sura III (January–February or April)[141] Q. Sosius Senecio II suff. Acilius Rufus[142] (March–April) suff. C. Minicius Fundanus (May–August) C. Vettennius Severus suff. C. Julius Longinus (September–December) C. Valerius Paullinus 108 Ap. Annius Trebonius Gallus (January–?) M. Appius Bradua suff. P. Aelius Hadrianus (attested 22 June) M. Trebatius Priscus suff.[143] Q. Pompeius Falco (Attested 27 July) M. Titius Lustricus Bruttianus 109 A. Cornelius Palma Frontonianus II (January–February) P. Calvisius Tullus Ruso (January–April) suff. L. Annius Largus (March–April) suff. Cn. Antonius Fuscus (May–August) C. Julius Antiochus Epiphanes Philopappus suff. C. Aburnius Valens (September–December) C. Julius Proculus 110 M. Peducaeus Priscinus (January–March) Ser. Cornelius Scipio Salvidienus Orfitus suff. C. Avidius Nigrinus (April–June) Ti. Julius Aquila Polemaeanus suff. L. Catilius Severus Julianus Claudius Reginus (July–September) C. Erucianus Silo suff. A. Larcius Priscus (October–December) Sex. Marcius Honoratus 111 C. Calpurnius Piso (January–April) M. Vettius Bolanus suff. T. Avidius Quietus (May–August) L. Eggius Marullus suff. L. Octavius Crassus (September–December) P. Coelius Apollinaris 112 Imp. Caesar Nerva Trajanus Augustus VI (January) T. Sextius Cornelius Africanus (January–March) suff. [M. ?] Licinius Ruso (January–March) suff. Cn. Pinarius Cornelius Severus (April–June) L. Mummius Niger Q. Valerius Vegetus suff. P. Stertinius Quartus (July–September) T. Julius Maximus Manlianus Brocchus Servilianus suff. C. Claudius Severus (October–December) T. Settidius Firmus 113 L. Publilius Celsus II (January) C. Clodius Crispinus (January–April) suff. Ser. Cornelius Dolabella Metilianus Pompeius Marcellus (February–April) suff. L. Stertinius Noricus (May–August) L. Fadius Rufinus suff. Cn. Cornelius Urbicus (September–December) T. Sempronius Rufus 114 Q. Ninnius Hasta (January–April) P. Manilius Vopiscus Vicinillianus suff. C. Clodius Nummus (May–August) L. Caesennius Sospes[144] suff. L. Hedius Rufus Lollianus Avitus (September–December) M. Messius Rusticus[145] 115 L. Vipstanus Messalla (January–April) M. Pedo Vergilianus (January) suff. T. Statilius Maximus Severus Hadrianus (February–April) suff. L. Julius Frugi (May–August) P. Juventius Celsus T. Aufidius Hoenius Severianus suff. M. Pompeius Macrinus Neos Theophanes (September–December) T. Vibius Varus 116[146] L. Fundanius Lamia Aelianus (January–March) Sex. Carminius Vetus suff. Ti. Julius Secundus (April–June) M. Egnatius Marcellinus suff. D. Terentius Gentianus (July–September) L. Co[...][147] suff. L. Statius Aquila (October–December) C. Julius Alexander Berenicianus 117 Q. Aquilius Niger (January–? March) M. Rebilus Apronianus suff. L. Cossonius Gallus (Attested 16 August) P. Afranius Flavianus suff. ignotus (Attested 8 September) Cn. Minicius Faustinus 118[148] Imp. Caesar Trajanus Hadrianus Augustus II (January–June) Cn. Pedanius Fuscus Salinator (January–February) suff. Bellicius Tebanianus (March) suff. C. Ummidius Quadratus (Attested May) suff. L. Pomponius Bassus (Attested 9 July and 31 August) T. Sabinius Barbarus 119[149] Imp. Caesar Traianus Hadrianus Augustus III (January–April) P. Dasumius Rusticus (January–February) suff. A. Platorius Nepos (March–April) suff. M. Paccius Silvanus Q. Coredius Gallus Gargilius Antiquus (May–June) Q. Vibius Gallus suff. C. Herennius Capella (November–December) L. Coelius Rufus 120[150] L. Catilius Severus Julianus Claudius Reginus II T. Aurelius Fulvus Boionius Arrius Antoninus suff. C. Quinctius Certus Poblicius Marcellus (May–June) T. Rutilius Propinquus suff. C. Arminius Gallus[151] (Attested 19 October) C. Atilius Serranus 121 M. Annius Verus II (January–February) Cn. Arrius Augur suff. M. Herennius Faustus (March–April) Q. Pomponius Marcellus suff. T. Pomponius Antistianus Funisulanus Vettonianus (May–June) L. Pomponius Silvanus suff. M. Statorius Secundus (July–August) L. Sempronius Merula Auspicatus 122[148] M'. Acilius Aviola L. Corellius Neratius Pansa suff. Ti. Julius Candidus Capito (attested 17 July) L. Vitrasius Flamininus suff. C. Trebius Maximus (attested 18 November) T. Calestrius Tiro Orbius Speratus 123[152] Q. Articuleius Paetinus L. Venuleius Apronianus Octavius Priscus suff. T. Prifernius Geminus (Attested 16 June) P. Metilius Secundus suff. T. Salvius Rufinus Minicius Opimianus (Attested 10 August) Cn. Sentius Aburnianus 124[153] M'. Acilius Glabrio (January–April) C. Bellicius Flaccus Torquatus Tebanianus suff. A. Larcius Macedo (May–August) P. Ducenius Verres suff. C. Julius Gallus (September–December) C. Valerius Severus 125 M. Lollius Paulinus D. Valerius Asiaticus Saturninus II L. Titius Epidius Aquilinus suff. Q. Vetina Verus[154] (Attested 1 June) P. Lucius Cosconianus 126 M. Annius Verus III (January–February) C. Eggius Ambibulus suff. L. Valerius Propinquus (From 1 March) suff. L. Cuspius Camerinus (Attested 1 July) C. Saenius Severus 127 T. Atilius Rufus Titianus (January–March) M. Gavius Squilla Gallicanus suff. P. Tullius Varro (April) [D.?] Junius Paetus suff. Q. Tineius Rufus (May–September) M. Licinius Celer Nepos suff. L. Aemilius Juncus (October–December) Sex. Julius Severus 128 L. Nonius Calpurnius Torquatus Asprenas II (January) M. Annius Libo (January–March) suff. L. Caesennius Antoninus (February–March) suff. M. Junius Mettius Rufus (April–June) Q. Pomponius Maternus suff. L. Valerius Flaccus (July–September) M. [Junius Homullus ?][155] suff. A. Egrilius Plarianus (October–December) Q. [Planius Sardus Varius Ambibulus ?][156] 129 P. Juventius Celsus T. Aufidius Hoenius Severianus II (January–After 22 March) L. Neratius Marcellus II (January–? February) suff. Q. Julius Balbus (Attested 22 March) 130 Q. Fabius Catullinus (January–February) M. Flavius Aper suff. Cassius Agrippa (or Agrippinus) (Attested 19 March) Ti. Claudius Quartinus 131[157] Sergius Octavius Laenas Pontianus (January–April) M. Antonius Rufinus suff. L. Fabius Gallus (May–August) Q. Fabius Julianus 132 C. Junius Serius Augurinus (January–April) C. Trebius Sergianus suff. C. Acilius Priscus (September–December) A. Cassius Arrianus 133 M. Antonius Hiberus (January–April) P. Mummius Sisenna suff. Q. Flavius Tertullus (May–August) Q. Junius Rusticus suff. Ti. Claudius Atticus Herodes (September–December) P. Sufenas Verus 134 L. Julius Ursus Servianus III (January–March) T. Vibius Varus (January–April) suff. T. Haterius Nepos (Attested 2 April) suff. P. Licinius Pansa (Attested September–December) L. Attius Macro 135 L. Tutilius Lupercus Pontianus (January–April) P. Calpurnius Atilianus (Atticus Rufus?) suff. M. Cutius Priscus Messius Rusticus Aemilius Papus Arrius Proculus Julius Celsus (May–August) L. Burbuleius Optatus Ligarianus suff. P. Rutilius Fabianus (September–December) Cn. Papirius Aelianus Aemilius Tuscillus 136[158] L. Ceionius Commodus Sex. Vettulenus Civica Pompeianus 137 L. Aelius Caesar II P. Coelius Balbinus Vibullius Pius 138[159] Kanus Junius Niger (January–March) C. Pomponius Camerinus suff. M. Vindius Verus (April–June) P. Pactumeius Clemens (in absentia) suff. P. Cassius Secundus (October–December) Marcus Nonius Mucianus 139 Imp. Caesar T. Aelius Hadrianus Antoninus Augustus Pius II (January–April) C. Bruttius Praesens L. Fulvius Rusticus II suff. L. Minicius Natalis Quadronius Verus (July–August) L. Claudius Proculus suff. ignotus (September–October) C. Julius Scapula suff. M. Ceccius Justinus (November–December) C. Julius Bassus 140 Imp. Caesar T. Aelius Hadrianus Antoninus Augustus Pius III (January) M. Aurelius Caesar (January–April) suff. Q. Antonius Isauricus (May) L. Aurelius Flaccus suff. Julius Crassipes (Between June and October) ignotus suff. M. Barbius Aemilianus (November–December) T. Flavius Julianus 141 T. Hoenius Severus (January–February) M. Peducaeus Stloga Priscinus suff. C. Julius Pisibanus (May–June) (Larcius?) Lepidus suff. T. Caesernius Statianus (September–October) ignotus suff. L. Annius Fabianus (November–December) ignotus 142[160] L. Cuspius Pactumeius Rufinus (January–March) L. Statius Quadratus suff. L. Granius Castus (April–June) Ti. Junius Julianus suff. M. Cornelius Fronto (July–August) C. Laberius Priscus suff. L. Tusidius Campester (September–October) Q. Cornelius Senecio Annianus suff. [? Sulpicius] Julianus (November–December) T. Julius Castus 143 C. Bellicius Flaccus Torquatus (January–March) L. Vibullius Hipparchus Ti. Claudius Atticus Herodes suff. Q. Junius Calamus (Attested 7 August) M. Valerius Junianus 144 L. Hedius Rufus Lollianus Avitus (January–February) T. Statilius Maximus suff. L. Aemilius Carus (Attested 19 March) Q. Egrilius Plarianus suff. ignotus (Attested 7 September) Q. Laberius Licinianus suff. L. Marcius Celer M. Calpurnius Longus (Attested 18 December) D. Velius Fidus 145 Imp. Caesar T. Aelius Hadrianus Antoninus Augustus Pius IV (January–February) M. Aurelius Caesar II suff. L. Plautius Lamia Silvanus (March–April) L. Poblicola Priscus suff. Cn. Arrius Cornelius Proculus (May–June) D. Junius (Paetus?) suff. Q. Mustius Priscus (July–August) M. Pontius Laelianus suff. L. Petronius Sabinus (September–October) C. Vicrius Rufus suff. C. Fadius Rufus (November–December) P. Vicrius 146 Sex. Erucius Clarus II (January–February) Cn. Claudius Severus Arabianus (January–April) suff. Q. Licinius Modestinus (Sex.?) Attius Labeo (March–April) suff. P. Mummius Sisenna Rutilianus (May–June) T. Prifernius Paetus Rosianus Nonius Agricola C. Labeo Tetius Geminus suff. Cn. Terentius Homullus Iunior (July–August) L. Aurelius Gallus suff. Q. Voconius Saxa Fidus (September–October) C. Annianus Verus suff. L. Aemilius Longus (November–December) Q. Cornelius Proculus 147 C. Prastina Messalinus (January–March) L. Annius Largus suff. A. Claudius Charax (April–June) Q. Fuficius Cornutus suff. Cupressenus Gallus (July–September) Q. Cornelius Quadratus suff. Sex. Cocceius Severianus Honorinus (October–December) Ti. Licinius Cassius Cassianus (October–?) suff. C. Popilius Carus Pedo (To December) 148 L. Octavius Cornelius P. Salvius Julianus Aemilianus (January–March) C. Bellicius Calpurnius Torquatus suff. Satyrius Firmus (April–June) C. Salvius Capito suff. L. Coelius Festus (July–September) P. Orfidius Senecio suff. C. Fabius Agrippinus (October–December) M. Antonius Zeno 149 L. Sergius Salvidienus Scipio Orfitus[161] (January–? February) Q. Pompeius Sosius Priscus suff. Q. Passienus Licinus (Attested 5 July) C. Julius Avitus 150 M. Gavius Squilla Gallicanus (January–February) Sex. Carminius Vetus suff. --]mus (Attested 27 May) C. La[berius Priscus][162] suff. M. Cassius Apollinaris (Attested 1 August) M. Petronius Mamertinus 151 Sex. Quintilius Condianus (January–March) Sex. Quintilius Valerius Maximus suff. M. Cominius Secundus (Attested 24 September) L. Attidius Cornelianus suff. C. Curtius Justus (Attested 2 October) P. Julius Nauto 152 M'. Acilius Glabrio Cn. Cornelius Severus (January–March) M. Valerius Homullus suff. P. Sufenas [? Verus] (April–June) L. Dasumius Tullius Tuscus suff. C. Novius Priscus (July–September) L. Julius Romulus suff. P. Cluvius Maximus Paulinus (October–December) M. Servilius Silanus 153 L. Fulvius Rusticus C. Bruttius Praesens (January–March) A. Junius Rufinus suff. Sex. Caecilius Maximus[163] (April–June) M. Pontius Sabinus suff. P. Septimius Aper (July–September) M. Sedatius Severianus Julius Acer Metilius Nepos Rufinus Ti. Rutilianus Censor suff. C. Cattius Marcellus (October–December) Q. Petiedius Gallus 154 L. Aelius Aurelius Commodus I (January–March) T. Sextius Lateranus suff. [Prifernius ?] Paetus (April–June) M. Nonius Macrinus suff. M. Valerius Etruscus (?)[164] (July–August) L. [Aemilius Iuncus ?][165] suff. Ti. Claudius Julianus (September–October) Sex. Calpurnius Agricola suff. C. Julius Statius Severus (November–December) T. Junius Severus 155 C. Julius Severus (January–March) M. Junius Rufinus Sabinianus suff. C. Aufidius Victorinus (April–June) M. Gavius ...[166] suff. Antius Pollio (Attested 3 November) Minicius Opimianus[167] suff. [? D. Rupilius] Severus (Attested 11 December) L. Julius T. Statilius Severus 156 M. Ceionius Silvanus (January–February) C. Serius Augurinus suff. A. Avillius Urinatius Quadratus (Attested 7–14 March) Strabo Aemilianus suff. Q. Canusius Praenestinus (Attested 13 December) C. Lusius Sparsus 157 M. Vettulenus Civica Barbarus (January–March) M. Metilius Aquillius Regulus Nepos Volusius Torquatus Fronto suff. L. Roscius Aelianus (April-? June) Cn. Papirius Aelianus suff. C. Julius Commodus Orfitianus (Attested 28 September) C. Caelius Secundus suff. Q. Vilius Proculus[168] (Attested 6 December) Q. [...]binus 158 Sextus Sulpicius Tertullus (January–March ?) Q. Tineius Sacerdos Clemens suff. M. Servilius Fabianus Maximus (Attested 8 July) Q. Iallius Bassus suff. Q. Pomponius Musa (Attested 27 December) L. Cassius Juvenalis 159 Plautius Quintillus (January–March) M. Statius Priscus Licinius Italicus suff. M. Pisibanius Lepidus (April–June) L. Matuccius Fuscinus suff. Publius Cornelius Dexter (July–September) ignotus suff. A. Curtius Crispinus (October–December) ignotus 160 Appius Annius Atilius Bradua (January–February) T. Clodius Vibius Varus suff. A. Platorius Nepos Calpurnianus (March–April) M. Postumius Festus suff. [? C. Septimius] Severus[169] (May–June) [...] Flavus[170] suff. C. Prastina Pacatus (July–September) M. Censorius Paulus[171] suff. Ti. Oclatius Severus (October–December) [Q.?] Ninnius Hastianus (October-?) suff. [... N]ovius Sabinianus (Attested 18 December) 161 M. Aurelius Caesar III (1–13 January or 31 January) L. Aelius Aurelius Commodus II suff. M. Annius Libo (13 or 31 January–? March) Q. Camurius Numisius Junior suff. [? Julius] Geminus Capellianus (Attested 26 October) T. Flavius Boethus 162[172] Q. Junius Rusticus II L. Titius Plautius Aquilinus suff.[173] Ti. Claudius Paullinus (Attested 23 August) Ti. Claudius Pompeianus suff. D. Fonteius Frontinianus L. Stertinius Rufus ignotus suff. M. Insteius Bithynicus ignotus 163 M. Pontius Laelianus A. Junius Pastor L. Caesennius Sospes 164 M. Pompeius Macrinus P. Juventius Celsus suff. Ti. Haterius Saturninus (Attested 19 and 21 July) Q. Caecilius Avitus 165[160] M. Gavius Orfitus L. Arrius Pudens 166 Q. Servilius Pudens L. Fufidius Pollio suff. M. Vibius Liberalis (Attested 23 March) P. Martius Verus 167 Imp. Caesar L. Aurelius Verus Augustus III M. Ummidius Quadratus suff. Q. Caecilius Dentilianus (Attested 5 May) M. Antonius Pallas 168 L. Venuleius Apronianus Octavius Priscus II L. Sergius Paullus II suff. Q. Tullius Maximus[174] ignotus 169 Q. Pompeius Senecio Sosius Priscus P. Coelius Apollinaris 170 C. Erucius Clarus M. Gavius Cornelius Cethegus suff. T. Hoenius Severus ignotus 171 T. Statilius Severus L. Alfidius Herennianus 172 Ser. Calpurnius Scipio Orfitus Sex. Quintilius Maximus suff. C. Modius Justus ignotus 173 Cn. Claudius Severus II Ti. Claudius Pompeianus II 174 L. Aurelius Gallus Q. Volusius Flaccus Cornelianus suff. M. Aemilius Macer Saturninus ignotus 175 L. Calpurnius Piso P. Salvius Julianus suff. P. Helvius Pertinax M. Didius Severus Julianus 176 T. Pomponius Proculus Vitrasius Pollio II M. Flavius Aper II 177 L. Aelius Aurelius Commodus Caesar I M. Peducaeus Plautius Quintillus 178 Ser. Cornelius Scipio Salvidienus Orfitus D. Velius Rufus (Julianus?) 179 Imp. Caesar L. Aelius Aurelius Commodus Augustus II P. Martius Verus II suff.[175] T. Flavius Claudianus (Attested 21 March) L. Aemilius Iuncus suff.[176] M'. Acilius Faustinus (Attested 1 April) L. Julius Proculianus 180 L. Fulvius Rusticus C. Bruttius Praesens II Sex. Quintilius Condianus 181[177] Imp. Caesar L. Aurelius Commodus Augustus III L. Antistius Burrus 182 M. Petronius Sura Mamertinus Q. Tineius Rufus suff. (?) Aurelianus (Attested 15 May) (L. Attidius?) Cornelianus 183 Imp. Caesar M. Aurelius Commodus Antoninus Augustus IV C. Aufidius Victorinus II suff. L. Tutilius Pontianus Gentianus (Attested 8 February) ignotus suff. M. Herennius Secundus (Attested 13 and 20 May) M. Egnatius Postumus suff. T. Pactumeius Magnus (After 20 May) L. Septimius Flaccus 184 L. Cossonius Eggius Marullus Cn. Papirius Aelianus suff. C. Octavius Vindex (Attested 18 May) Cassius Apronianus[178] 185 Triarius Maternus Lascivius Ti. Claudius M. Ap. Atilius Bradua Regillus Atticus 186 Imp. Caesar M. Aurelius Commodus Antoninus Augustus V M'. Acilius Glabrio II suff. L. Novius Rufus (Attested 25 May) L. Annius Ravus[179] suff. C. Sabucius Maior Caecilianus (Attested 24 and 27 November) Valerius Senecio 187 L. Bruttius Quintius Crispinus L. Roscius Aelianus Paculus 188 P. Seius Fuscianus II M. Servilius Silanus II 189 Dulius Silanus Q. Servilius Silanus suff. Severus (Attested 27 May) Vitellius 190 Imp. Caesar M. Aurelius Commodus Antoninus Augustus VI M. Petronius Sura Septimianus suff. L. Septimius Severus (May–?) Apuleius Rufinus[180] 191 Popilius Pedo Apronianus M. Valerius Bradua Mauricus 192 Imp. Caesar L. Aelius Aurelius Commodus Augustus VII P. Helvius Pertinax II 193[181] Q. Pompeius Sosius Falco C. Julius Erucius Clarus Vibianus suff. Q. Tineius Sacerdos (March) P. Julius Scapula Priscus suff. M. Silius Messala (May) ignotus suff. L. Julius Messala Rutilianus (July) C. Aemilius Severus Cantabrinus suff. L. Fabius Cilo Septiminus Catinius Acilianus Lepidus Fulcinianus[182] 194 Imp. Caesar L. Septimius Severus Pertinax Augustus II D. Clodius Septimius Albinus Caesar II suff. C. Gabinius Barbarus Pompeianus ignotus 195 P. Julius Scapula Tertullus Priscus Q. Tineius Clemens 196 C. Domitius Dexter II L. Valerius Messalla Thrasea Priscus 197 T. Sextius Magius Lateranus Cuspius Rufinus[183] 198 P. Martius Sergius Saturninus L. Aurelius Gallus suff. Q. Anicius Faustus[184] ignotus 199 P. Cornelius Anullinus II M. Aufidius Fronto 200 Ti. Claudius Severus Proculus C. Aufidius Victorinus 3rd century (201–300)[edit] Year Consul prior Consul posterior 201 L. Annius Fabianus M. Nonius Arrius Mucianus 202 Imp. Caesar L. Septimius Severus Pertinax Augustus III Imp. Caesar M. Aurelius Antoninus Augustus suff.[185] T. Murrenius Severus C. Cassius Regallianus 203 C. Fulvius Plautianus P. Septimius Geta II 204 L. Fabius Cilo Septiminus Catinius Acilianus Lepidus Fulcinianus II M. Annius Flavius Libo suff. L. Pomponius Liberalis[186] ignotus 205 Imp. Caesar M. Aurelius Antoninus Augustus II P. Septimius Geta Caesar 206 M. Nummius Umbrius Primus Senecio Albinus L. Fulvius Gavius Numisius Petronius Aemilianus suff.[187] P. Tullius Marsus (Attested 10 December) M. Caelius Faustinus 207 L. Annius Maximus[188] C. Septimius Severus Aper 208 Imp. Caesar M. Aurelius Antoninus Augustus III P. Septimius Geta Caesar II 209 L. Aurelius Commodus Pompeianus Q. Hedius Lollianus Plautius Avitus 210 M'. Acilius Faustinus A. Triarius Rufinus 211 Hedius Lollianus Terentius Gentianus Pomponius Bassus 212 C. Julius Asper II C. Julius Camilius Asper suff. (Cn. Claudius ?) Severus (May - June) (Ti. Claudius ?) Pompeianus 213 Imp. Caesar M. Aurelius Severus Antoninus Augustus IV D. Caelius Calvinus Balbinus II 214 L. Valerius Messalla C. Octavius Appius Suetrius Sabinus 215 Q. Maecius Laetus II M. Munatius Sulla Cerialis 216 P. Catius Sabinus II P. Cornelius Anullinus 217 C. Bruttius Praesens T. Messius Extricatus II 218 Imp. Caesar M. Opellius Severus Macrinus Augustus II M. Oclatinius Adventus suff. Imp. Caesar M. Aurelius Antoninus Augustus (from 8 June) 219 Imp. Caesar M. Aurelius Antoninus Augustus II Q. Tineius Sacerdos II 220 Imp. Caesar M. Aurelius Antoninus Augustus III P. Valerius Comazon 221 C. Vettius Gratus Sabinianus M. Flavius Vitellius Seleucus 222 Imp. Caesar M. Aurelius Antoninus Augustus IV M. Aurelius Alexander Caesar I 223 L. Marius Maximus Perpetuus Aurelianus II L. Roscius Aelianus Paculus Salvius Julianus 224 Ap. Claudius Julianus II C. Bruttius Crispinus 225 Ti. Manilius Fuscus II Ser. Calpurnius Domitius Dexter 226 Imp. Caesar M. Aurelius Severus Alexander Augustus II C. Aufidius Marcellus II 227 M. Nummius Senecio Albinus M. Laelius Fulvius Maximus Aemilianus 228 Q. Aiacius Modestus Crescentianus II M. Pomponius Maecius Probus 229 Imp. Caesar M. Aurelius Severus Alexander Augustus III L. Claudius Cassius Dio Cocceianus II 230 L. Virius Agricola Sex. Catius Clementinus Priscillianus 231 L. Ti. Claudius Pompeianus T. Flavius Sallustius Paelignianus 232 L. Virius Lupus Julianus L. Marius Maximus 233 L. Valerius Maximus . . . Acilius Priscillianus Cn. Cornelius Paternus 234 M. Clodius Pupienus Maximus II M. Munatius Sulla Urbanus[189] 235 Cn. Claudius Severus L. Ti. Claudius Quintianus 236[190] Imp. Caesar C. Julius Verus Maximinus Augustus M. Pupienus Africanus Maximus 237 L. Marius Perpetuus L. Mummius Felix Cornelianus 238 [? L.] Fulvius Pius Pontius Proculus Pontianus 239 Imp. Caesar M. Antonius Gordianus Augustus M'. Acilius Aviola 240 C. Octavius Appius Suetrius Sabinus II L. Ragonius Venustus 241 Imp. Caesar M. Antonius Gordianus Augustus II Clodius Pompeianus 242 C. Vettius Gratus Atticus Sabinianus C. Asinius Lepidus Praetextatus 243 L. Annius Arrianus C. Cervonius Papus 244 Ti. Pollienus Armenius Peregrinus Fulvius Aemilianus 245 Imp. Caesar M. Julius Philippus Augustus C. Maesius Titianus 246 C. Bruttius Praesens C. Allius Albinus[191] 247 Imp. Caesar M. Julius Philippus Augustus II M. Julius Severus Philippus Caesar 248 Imp. Caesar M. Julius Philippus Augustus III Imp. Caesar M. Julius Severus Philippus Augustus II 249 L. Fulvius Gavius Numisius Aemilianus II L. Naevius Aquilinus 250 Imp. Caesar C. Messius Quintus Trajanus Decius Augustus II C. Vettius Gratus 251 Imp. Caesar C. Messius Quintus Trajanus Decius Augustus III Q. Herennius Etruscus Messius Decius Caesar 252 Imp. Caesar C. Vibius Trebonianus Gallus Augustus II Imp. Caesar C. Vibius Volusianus Augustus 253 Imp. Caesar C. Vibius Volusianus Augustus II L. Valerius Poplicola Balbinus Maximus 254 Imp. Caesar P. Licinius Valerianus Augustus II Imp. Caesar P. Licinius Gallienus Augustus 255 Imp. Caesar P. Licinius Valerianus Augustus III Imp. Caesar P. Licinius Gallienus Augustus II 256 L. Valerius Maximus . . . Acilius Priscillianus II M. Acilius Glabrio 257 Imp. Caesar P. Licinius Valerianus Augustus IV Imp. Caesar P. Licinius Gallienus Augustus III 258 M. Nummius Tuscus Mummius Bassus 259 (Nummius) Aemilianus (Dexter) Pomponius Bassus I 260 P. Cornelius Saecularis II C. Junius Donatus II Imp. Caesar M. Cassianius Latinius Postumus Augustus II (Gaul) Honoratianus (Gaul)[192] 261 Imp. Caesar P. Licinius Gallienus Augustus IV L. Petronius Taurus Volusianus Imp. Caesar M. Cassianius Latinius Postumus Augustus III (Gaul) Imp. Caesar Fulvius Macrianus Augustus II (East) Imp. Caesar Fulvius Quietus Augustus (East) 262 Imp. Caesar P. Licinius Gallienus Augustus V Nummius Faustianus 263 M. Nummius Albinus II Dexter (Maximus?) 264 Imp. Caesar P. Licinius Gallienus Augustus VI Saturninus 265 P. Licinius Valerianus II Lucillus 266 Imp. Caesar P. Licinius Gallienus Augustus VII Sabinillus 267 Ovinius Gaius Julius Aquilius Paternus Arcesilaus Imp. Caesar M. Cassianius Latinius Postumus Augustus IV (Gaul) M. Piavonius Victorinus I (Gaul) 268 Aspasius Paternus II P. Licinius Egnatius Marinianus Imp. Caesar M. Cassianius Latinius Postumus Augustus V (Gaul) 269 Imp. Caesar M. Aurelius Claudius Augustus Paternus Imp. Caesar M. Piavonius Victorinus II (Gaul) Sanctus (Gaul) 270 Flavius Antiochianus II Virius Orfitus Imp. Caesar M. Piavonius Victorinus II (Gaul) 271 Imp. Caesar L. Domitius Aurelianus Augustus I Pomponius Bassus II Imp. Caesar C. Pius Esuvius Tetricus Augustus I (Gaul) 272 T. Flavius Postumius Quietus Junius Veldumnianus Imp. Caesar C. Pius Esuvius Tetricus Augustus II (Gaul) 273 M. Claudius Tacitus I Julius Placidianus Imp. Caesar C. Pius Esuvius Tetricus Augustus III (Gaul) 274 Imp. Caesar L. Domitius Aurelianus Augustus II Capitolinus 275 Imp. Caesar L. Domitius Aurelianus Augustus III (Aurelius?) Marcellinus[193] 276 Imp. Caesar M. Claudius Tacitus Augustus II (Fulvius?) Aemilianus 277 Imp. Caesar M. Aurelius Probus Augustus I Paulinus 278 Imp. Caesar M. Aurelius Probus Augustus II Virius Lupus 279 Imp. Caesar M. Aurelius Probus Augustus III Nonius Paternus II 280 (Lucius Valerius?) Messalla (Vettius?) Gratus 281 Imp. Caesar M. Aurelius Probus Augustus IV Junius Tiberianus 282 Imp. Caesar M. Aurelius Probus Augustus V Victorinus 283 Imp. Caesar M. Aurelius Carus Augustus II Imp. Caesar M. Aurelius Carinus Augustus I 284 Imp. Caesar M. Aurelius Carinus Augustus II Imp. Caesar M. Aurelius Numerianus Augustus suff. Imp. Caesar C. Valerius Diocletianus Augustus I (November–December ) (?) L. Caesonius Ovinius Rufinus Manilius Bassus II (November–December ) 285 Imp. Caesar M. Aurelius Carinus Augustus III (West) T. Claudius Aurelius Aristobulus Imp. Caesar C. Valerius Diocletianus Augustus II (East)[194] 286 M. Junius Maximus II Vettius Aquilinus 287 Imp. Caesar C. Aurelius Valerius Diocletianus Augustus III Imp. Caesar M. Aurelius Valerius Maximianus Augustus I 288 Imp. Caesar M. Aurelius Valerius Maximianus Augustus II Pomponius Januarianus suff. ... a ... ivianus[195] Imp. Caesar M. Aurelius Mausaeus Carausius II (Britain) 289 M. Magrius Bassus (January -June)[196] L. Ragonius Quintianus (January–June) suff. M. Umbrius Primus (July–August ) T. Flavius Coelianus (July–August ) suff. M. Ceionius Proculus (September–October ) Helvius Clemens (September–October) suff. Flavius Decimus (November–December ) ... ninius Maximus (November–December ) Imp. Caesar M. Aurelius Mausaeus Carausius III (Britain) 290 Imp. Caesar C. Aurelius Valerius Diocletianus Augustus IV Imp. Caesar M. Aurelius Valerius Maximianus Augustus III Imp. Caesar M. Aurelius Mausaeus Carausius IV (Britain) 291 C. Junius Tiberianus II Cassius Dio 292 Afranius Hannibalianus Julius Asclepiodotus 293 Imp. Caesar C. Aurelius Valerius Diocletianus Augustus V Imp. Caesar M. Aurelius Valerius Maximianus Augustus IV 294 Flavius Valerius Constantius Caesar I C. Galerius Valerius Maximianus Caesar I 295 Nummius Tuscus C. Annius Anullinus 296 Imp. Caesar C. Aurelius Valerius Diocletianus Augustus VI Flavius Valerius Constantius Caesar II 297 Imp. Caesar M. Aurelius Valerius Maximianus Augustus V C. Galerius Valerius Maximianus Caesar II 298 Anicius Faustus II Virius Gallus 299 Imp. Caesar C. Aurelius Valerius Diocletianus Augustus VII Imp. Caesar M. Aurelius Valerius Maximianus Augustus VI 300 Flavius Valerius Constantius Caesar III C. Galerius Valerius Maximianus Caesar III 4th century (301–395)[edit] Year Consul prior Consul posterior 301 T. Flavius Postumius Titianus II Virius Nepotianus 302 Flavius Valerius Constantius Caesar IV C. Galerius Valerius Maximianus Caesar IV 303 Imp. Caesar C. Aurelius Valerius Diocletianus Augustus VIII Imp. Caesar M. Aurelius Valerius Maximianus Augustus VII 304 Imp. Caesar C. Aurelius Valerius Diocletianus Augustus IX Imp. Caesar M. Aurelius Valerius Maximianus Augustus VIII 305 Flavius Valerius Constantius Caesar V C. Galerius Valerius Maximianus Caesar V 306 Flavius Valerius Constantius Augustus VI C. Galerius Valerius Maximianus Augustus VI 307 M. Aurelius Valerius Maximianus Augustus IX (West) Flavius Valerius Constantinus Caesar (West) Flavius Valerius Severus Augustus (East) Galerius Valerius Maximinus Caesar (East) C. Galerius Valerius Maximianus Augustus VII (Rome, January–April) Galerius Valerius Maximinus Caesar (Rome, January–April) 308 M. Aurelius Valerius Maximianus Augustus X (West) C. Galerius Valerius Maximianus Augustus VII (West) C. Aurelius Valerius Diocletianus senior Augustus X (East) C. Galerius Valerius Maximianus Augustus VII (East) M. Aurelius Valerius Maxentius Augustus (Rome, April–December) Valerius Romulus I (Rome, April–December) 309 Valerius Licinianus Licinius Augustus Flavius Valerius Constantinus Augustus M. Aurelius Valerius Maxentius Augustus II (Rome) Valerius Romulus II (Rome) 310 Tatius Andronicus Pompeius Probus M. Aurelius Valerius Maxentius Augustus III (Rome) 311 C. Galerius Valerius Maximianus Augustus VIII Galerius Valerius Maximinus Augustus II C. Caeionius Rufius Volusianus (Rome, from September) Aradius Rufinus (Rome, from September) 312 Flavius Valerius Constantinus Augustus II Valerius Licinianus Licinius Augustus II M. Aurelius Valerius Maxentius Augustus IV (Rome) 313 Flavius Valerius Constantinus Augustus III Valerius Licinianus Licinius Augustus III Galerius Valerius Maximinus Augustus III (Rome, Egypt, inter alios) 314 C. Caeionius Rufius Volusianus II Petronius Annianus 315 Flavius Valerius Constantinus Augustus IV Valerius Licinianus Licinius Augustus IV 316 Antonius Caecina Sabinus C. Vettius Cossinius Rufinus 317 Ovinius Gallicanus Caesonius Bassus (from February) 318 Valerius Licinianus Licinius Augustus V Flavius Julius Crispus Caesar 319 Flavius Valerius Constantinus Augustus V Valerius Licinianus Licinius Caesar 320 Flavius Valerius Constantinus Augustus VI Flavius Claudius Constantinus Caesar 321 Flavius Julius Crispus Caesar II (West) Flavius Claudius Constantinus Caesar II (West) Valerius Licinianus Licinius Augustus VI (East) Valerius Licinianus Licinius Caesar II (East) 322 Petronius Probianus (West) Amnius Anicius Julianus (West) Post consulatum Licinii Augusti VI et Licinii Caesaris II (East) 323 Acilius Severus (West) Vettius Rufinus (West)[197] II post consulatum Licinii Augusti VI et Licinii Caesaris II (East) 324 Flavius Julius Crispus Caesar III Flavius Claudius Constantinus Caesar III 325 Valerius Proculus (January–May)[198] Sex. Anicius Paulinus suff. Julius Julianus (May–December)[199] 326 Flavius Valerius Constantinus Augustus VII Flavius Julius Constantius Caesar 327 Flavius Constantius L. Valerius Maximus Basilius 328 Flavius Januarinus Vettius Justus 329 Flavius Valerius Constantinus Augustus VIII Flavius Claudius Constantinus Caesar IV 330 Flavius Gallicanus Aurelius Valerius Tullianus Symmachus 331 Junius Annius Bassus Ablabius 332 Lucius Papius Pacatianus Maecilius Hilarianus 333 Flavius Dalmatius Domitius Zenophilus 334 Flavius Optatus Amnius M'. Caesonius Nicomachus Anicius Paulinus Honorius 335 Julius Constantius Caeionius Rufius Albinus 336 Virius Nepotianus Tettius Facundus 337 Flavius Felicianus T. Fabius Titianus 338 Flavius Ursus Flavius Polemius 339 Flavius Julius Constantius Augustus II Flavius Julius Constans Augustus 340 Septimius Acindynus L. Aradius Valerius Proculus Populonius 341 Antonius Marcellinus Petronius Probinus 342 Flavius Julius Constantius Augustus III Flavius Julius Constans Augustus II 343 M. Maecius Memmius Furius Baburius Caecilianus Placidus Flavius Romulus 344 Domitius Leontius (West and East) Flavius Bonosus (West, until April/May) Julius Sallustius (East, all year. West, after April/May) 345 Flavius Amantius M. Nummius Albinus 346 Flavius Julius Constantius Augustus IV Flavius Julius Constans Augustus III 347 Vulcacius Rufinus Flavius Eusebius 348 Flavius Philippus Flavius Salia 349 Ulpius Limenius Fabius Aconius Catullinus Philomathius 350 Flavius Sergius Flavius Nigrinianus 351 Flavius Magnus Magnentius Augustus (West) Gaiso (West) Post consulatum Sergii et Nigriniani (East) 352 Magnus Decentius Caesar (West) Paulus (West) Flavius Julius Constantius Augustus V (East) Flavius Claudius Constantius Caesar I (East) 353 Flavius Julius Constantius Augustus VI Flavius Claudius Constantius Caesar II 354 Flavius Julius Constantius Augustus VII Flavius Claudius Constantius Caesar III 355 Flavius Arbitio Q. Flavius Maesius Egnatius Lollianus Mavortius 356 Flavius Julius Constantius Augustus VIII Flavius Claudius Julianus Caesar 357 Flavius Julius Constantius Augustus IX Flavius Claudius Julianus Caesar II 358 Censorius Datianus Neratius Cerealis 359 Flavius Eusebius Flavius Hypatius 360 Flavius Julius Constantius Augustus X Flavius Claudius Julianus Caesar III 361 Flavius Taurus Flavius Florentius 362 Claudius Mamertinus Flavius Nevitta 363 Flavius Claudius Julianus Augustus IV Flavius Sallustius 364 Flavius Jovianus Augustus Varronianus 365 Flavius Valentinianus Augustus Flavius Valens Augustus 366 Flavius Gratianus Dagalaifus 367 Flavius Lupicinus Flavius Jovinus 368 Flavius Valentinianus Augustus II Flavius Valens Augustus II 369 Valentinianus Galates Flavius Victor 370 Flavius Valentinianus Augustus III Flavius Valens Augustus III 371 Flavius Gratianus Augustus II Sex. Claudius Petronius Probus 372 Domitius Modestus Flavius Arinthaeus 373 Flavius Valentinianus Augustus IV Flavius Valens Augustus IV 374 Flavius Gratianus Augustus III Flavius Equitius 375 Post consulatum Gratiani Augusti III et Equiti 376 Flavius Valens Augustus V Flavius Valentinianus iunior Augustus I 377 Flavius Gratianus Augustus IV Flavius Merobaudes I 378 Flavius Valens Augustus VI Flavius Valentinianus iunior Augustus II 379 Decimius Magnus Ausonius Q. Clodius Hermogenianus Olybrius 380 Flavius Gratianus Augustus V Flavius Theodosius Augustus 381 Flavius Syagrius Flavius Eucherius 382 Claudius Antonius Afranius Syagrius 383 Flavius Merobaudes II Flavius Saturninus 384 Flavius Ricomer Flavius Clearchus 385 Flavius Arcadius Augustus Flavius Bauto 386 Flavius Honorius Flavius Euodius 387 Flavius Valentinianus iunior Augustus III Eutropius 388 Flavius Merobaudes III (West, until Jan. 11) Flavius Theodosius Augustus II Magnus Maximus Augustus II (West, from Jan. 11) sine collega Flavius Theodosius Augustus II (East) Maternus Cynegius (East) 389 Flavius Timasius Flavius Promotus 390 Flavius Valentinianus iunior Augustus IV Flavius Neoterius 391 Flavius Eutolmius Tatianus Q. Aurelius Symmachus 392 Flavius Arcadius Augustus II Flavius Rufinus 393 Flavius Theodosius Augustus III (West and East) Flavius Eugenius Augustus (West) Flavius Abundantius (East) 394 Virius Nicomachus Flavianus (West) sine collega Flavius Arcadius Augustus III (East) Flavius Honorius Augustus II (East) 395 Anicius Hermogenianus Olybrius Anicius Probinus Roman Consuls of East and West (396–534)[edit] In 395, the Roman Empire was divided into a Western Roman Empire and an Eastern Roman Empire, and thereafter the separate courts each appointed one consul. Western Consuls continued to be appointed after the fall of the Western Roman Empire in 476. Year Eastern Consul Western Consul 396 Flavius Arcadius Augustus IV Flavius Honorius Augustus III 397 Flavius Caesarius Nonius Atticus 398 Flavius Eutychianus Flavius Honorius Augustus IV 399 Eutropius Flavius Mallius Theodorus 400 Aurelianus Flavius Stilicho 401 Flavius Vincentius Flavius Fravitta (Fravitus) 402 Flavius Arcadius Augustus V Flavius Honorius Augustus V 403 Flavius Theodosius Augustus I Flavius Rumoridus 404 Aristaenetus Flavius Honorius Augustus VI 405 Flavius Anthemius Flavius Stilicho II 406 Flavius Arcadius Augustus VI Anicius Petronius Probus 407 Flavius Theodosius Augustus II Flavius Honorius Augustus VII 408 Anicius Auchenius Bassus Flavius Philippus 409 Flavius Theodosius Augustus III Flavius Honorius Augustus VIII Flavius Claudius Constantinus Augustus (Britannia/Gaul) 410 Varanes Tertullus 411 Flavius Theodosius Augustus IV sine collega 412 Flavius Theodosius Augustus V Flavius Honorius Augustus IX 413 Heraclianus Flavius Lucius 414 Flavius Constantius Flavius Constans 415 Flavius Theodosius Augustus VI Flavius Honorius Augustus X 416 Flavius Theodosius Augustus VII Junius Quartus Palladius 417 Flavius Honorius Augustus XI Flavius Constantius II 418 Flavius Theodosius Augustus VIII Flavius Honorius Augustus XII 419 Flavius Monaxius Flavius Plinta 420 Flavius Theodosius Augustus IX Flavius Constantius III 421 Flavius Eustathius Flavius Agricola 422 Flavius Theodosius Augustus X Flavius Honorius Augustus XIII 423 Flavius Asclepiodotus Flavius Avitus Marinianus 424 Flavius Castinus Victor 425 Johannes Augustus (West) Flavius Theodosius Augustus XI Placidus Valentinianus Caesar 426 Flavius Theodosius Augustus XII Flavius Placidus Valentinianus Augustus II 427 Flavius Hierius Flavius Ardaburius 428 Flavius Taurus Flavius Felix 429 Flavius Florentius Flavius Dionysius 430 Flavius Theodosius Augustus XIII Flavius Placidus Valentinianus Augustus III 431 Anicius Auchenius Bassus Flavius Antiochus 432 Flavius Valerius Flavius Aëtius 433 Flavius Theodosius Augustus XIV Petronius Maximus 434 Flavius Ardaburius Aspar Flavius Areobindus 435 Flavius Theodosius Augustus XV Flavius Placidus Valentinianus Augustus IV 436 Flavius Anthemius Isidorus Flavius Senator 437 Flavius Sigisvultus Flavius Aëtius II 438 Flavius Theodosius Augustus XVI Anicius Acilius Glabrio Faustus 439 Flavius Theodosius Augustus XVII Festus 440 Flavius Anatolius Flavius Placidus Valentinianus Augustus V 441 Flavius Taurus Seleucus Cyrus sine collega 442 Flavius Dioscorus Flavius Eudoxius 443 Flavius Paterius Petronius Maximus II 444 Flavius Theodosius Augustus XVIII Caecina Decius Aginatius Albinus 445 Flavius Nomus Flavius Placidus Valentinianus Augustus VI 446 Flavius Aetius III (West) Q. Aurelius Symmachus 447 Flavius Ardaburius iunior Flavius Calepius 448 Flavius Zeno Rufius Praetextatus Postumianus 449 Flavius Astyrius (West) Flavius Flor(entius?) Romanus Protogenes 450 Gennadius Avienus Flavius Placidus Valentinianus Augustus VII 451 Flavius Marcianus Augustus VI Valerius Faltonius Adelfius 452 Flavius Sporacius Flavius Bassus Herculanus 453 Flavius Rufius Opilio Iohannes Vincomalus 454 Flavius Aëtius[200] Flavius Studius (East) 455 Procopius Anthemius Flavius Placidus Valentinianus Augustus VIII 456 Eparchius Avitus Augustus (West) sine collega Johannes (East) Varanes (East) 457 Flavius Constantinus Flavius Rufus (East) 458 Flavius Leo Augustus Julius Valerius Majorianus Augustus 459 Flavius Patricius Flavius Ricimer 460 Flavius Magnus Flavius Apollonius 461 Flavius Dagalaiphus Flavius Severinus 462 Flavius Valerius Leo Augustus II Libius Severus Augustus 463 Flavius Antoninus Messala Vivianus Caecina Decius Basilius 464 Anicius Olybrius Flavius Rusticius 465 Flavius Hermenericus Flavius Basiliscus 466 Flavius Valerius Leo Augustus III Tatianus (Gaul) 467 Flavius Pusaeus Flavius Johannes (East) 468 sine collega Procopius Anthemius Augustus II 469 Flavius Zeno Flavius Marcianus 470 Messius Phoebus Severus (West) Flavius Jordanes 471 Flavius Valerius Novus Leo Augustus IV Caelius Aconius Probianus 472 Rufius Postumius Festus Flavius Marcianus II 473 Flavius Valerius Leo Augustus V sine collega 474 Flavius Leo iunior Augustus sine collega 475 Flavius Zeno Augustus II Post consulatum Leonis iunioris Augusti (West) 476 Flavius Basiliscus Augustus II Flavius Armatus 477 Post consulatum Basilisci Augusti II et Armati 478 Illus sine collega 479 Flavius Zeno Augustus III sine collega 480 sine collega Caecina Decius Maximus Basilius iunior[201] 481 sine collega Rufius Achilius Maecius Placidus 482 Flavius Appalius Illus Trocundes Severinus iunior 483 Post consulatum Trocundis (East) Anicius Acilius Aginantius Faustus iunior 484 Flavius Theodericus Decius Marius Venantius Basilius 485 Post consulatum Theoderici (East) Q. Aurelius Memmius Symmachus iunior 486 Flavius Longinus Caecina Mavortius Basilius Decius iunior 487 Post consulatum Longini (East) Nar. Manlius Boëthius 488 Claudius Julius Ecclesius Dynamius Rufius Achilius Sividius 489 Flavius Eusebius Petronius Probinus 490 Flavius Longinus II Anicius Probus Faustus iunior 491 Flavius Olybrius Iunior sine collega 492 Flavius Anastasius Augustus Flavius Rufus[202] 493 Flavius Eusebius II Flavius Albinus iunior 494 Flavius Turcius Rufius Apronianus Asterius Flavius Praesidius 495 sine collega Flavius Viator[203] 496 Flavius Paulus Post consulatum Viatoris (West) 497 Flavius Anastasius Augustus II II post consulatum Viatoris (West) 498 Johannes Scytha Flavius Paulinus 499 Flavius Johannes qui est Gibbus Post consulatum Paulini (West) 500 Flavius Patricius Flavius Hypatius 501 Flavius Pompeius Flavius Avienus iunior 502 Flavius Probus Rufius Magnus Faustus Avienus iunior 503 Flavius Dexicrates[204] Flavius Volusianus[204] 504 sine collega Rufius Petronius Nicomachus Cethegus 505 Flavius Sabinianus Flavius Theodorus 506 Flavius Areobindus Dagalaiphus Areobindus Flavius Ennodius Messala 507 Flavius Anastasius Augustus III Venantius iunior 508 Flavius Celer Basilius Venantius iunior 509 sine collega Flavius Inportunus iunior 510 sine collega Anicius Manlius Severinus Boëthius iunior 511 Flavius Secundinus Felix 512 Flavius Paulus Flavius Moschianus (East) 513 Taurus Clementinus Armonius Clementinus Flavius Probus 514 Magnus Aurelius Cassiodorus Senator sine collega 515 Procopius Anthemius Flavius Florentius[204] 516 sine collega Flavius Petrus 517 Flavius Anastasius Paulus Probus Sabinianus Pompeius Anastasius Flavius Agapitus 518 Flavius Anastasius Paulus Probus Moschianus Probus Magnus Post consulatum Agapiti (West) 519 Flavius Justinus Augustus Eutharicus Cillica 520 Flavius Vitalianus Flavius Rusticius[204] 521 Flavius Petrus Sabbatius Justinianus Flavius Valerius 522 Flavius Symmachus (West) Flavius Boëthius (West) 523 sine collega Flavius Anicius Maximus 524 Flavius Justinus Augustus II Venantius Opilio 525 Flavius Theodorus Philoxenus Soterichus Philoxenus Flavius Probus iunior 526 sine collega Flavius Olybrius iunior 527 sine collega Vettius Agorius Basilius Mavortius 528 Flavius Petrus Sabbatius Justinianus Augustus II Post consulatum Mavortii (West) 529 sine collega Flavius Decius Iunior; II post consulatum Mavortii (Gaul) 530 Flavius Lampadius[204] Rufius Gennadius Probus Orestes 531 Post consulatum Lampadii et Orestis Post consulatum Lampadii et Orestis 532 II post consulatum Lampadii et Orestis II post consulatum Lampadii et Orestis 533 Flavius Petrus Sabbatius Justinianus Augustus III III post consulatum Lampadii et Orestis (West) 534 Flavius Petrus Sabbatius Justinianus Augustus IV Flavius Decius Paulinus iunior Roman Consuls of the East alone (535–887)[edit] During the reign of Justinian I (527–565), the position of consul altered in two significant ways. From 535, there was no longer a Roman consul chosen in the West. In 541, the separate office of Roman consul was abolished.[205] When used thereafter, the office was with few exceptions used as part of the imperial title. The office was finally abolished as part of the Basilika reforms of Leo VI the Wise in 887.[206] Year Eastern Roman Consul 535[207] Flavius Belisarius 536 Post consulatum Belisarii 537 II post consulatum Belisarii 538 Flavius Marianus Michaelius Gabrielius Archangelius Johannes[208] 539 Flavius Strategius Apion Strategius Apion 540 Flavius Mar. Petrus Theodorus Valentinus Rusticius Boraides Germanus Justinus 541 Anicius Faustus Albinus Basilius iunior 566 Flavius Justinus Augustus 568 Flavius Justinus Augustus II 579 Flavius Tiberius Constantinus Augustus 583 Flavius Mauricius Tiberius Augustus 603 Flavius Phocas Augustus 611 Flavius Heraclius Augustus 613 Flavius Heraclius Novus Constantinus Augustus 615 Leontius (honorary) 639 Flavius Constantinus Heraclius Augustus 642 Flavius Constantinus Augustus 656 Theodosius,[209] Paulus[209] 668 Flavius Constantinus Augustus 686 Flavius Justinianus Augustus[210][211] 699 Tiberius Augustus 711 Philippicus Augustus[212] 714 Anastasius Augustus 718 Leo Augustus 742 Constantinus Augustus 776 Leo Augustus 782 Constantinus Augustus 803 Nicephorus Augustus 814 Leo Augustus 821 Michael Augustus 830 Theophilus Augustus 843 Michael Augustus 867 Basilius Augustus 887 Leo Augustus References[edit] ^ a b c d e f g "Consules", in Harper's Dictionary of Classical Antiquities. ^ a b c d e f g "Consul" in A Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities. ^ Broughton, The Magistrates of the Roman Republic, vol. I, pp. xi, xii. ^ "Dictator" in Harper's Dictionary of Classical Antiquities. ^ Broughton, The Magistrates of the Roman Republic, vol. I, pp. xi, xii, 141, 148, 149, 163, 171. ^ Livy, History of Rome, iii. 32 ff. ^ "Decemviri" in Harper's Dictionary of Classical Antiquities. ^ a b "Tribunus" in Harper's Dictionary of Classical Antiquities. ^ Livy, History of Rome, vi. 42, vii. 1. ^ Broughton, The Magistrates of the Roman Republic, vol. I, pp. 108–114. ^ Anthony Grafton and Noel Swerdlow, "Technical Chronology and Astrological History in Varro, Censorinus, and Others", Classical Quarterly, N.S. 35 (1985), p. 454-65 ^ Lendering, Jona (2008). "Varronian Chronology". Livius.Org. ^ Tacitus, Historiae, 3.37 ^ The evidence for this is collected in Lily Ross Taylor and T. Robert S. Broughton, "The Order of the Two Consuls' Names in the Yearly Lists", Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome, 19 (1949), pp. 3-14 ^ Taylor, "Augustan Editing in the Capitoline Fasti", pp. 73–80. ^ Roger S. Bagnall, et alia, Consuls of the later Roman Empire, Philological Monographs #36 (Atlanta: American Philological Association, 1987), pp. 13-18 ^ The fasti for the Gallic consuls under Postumus are incomplete, with the names of some ordinary consuls known, but not the year they served — see Martindale et al., Prosopography of the Later Roman Empire (1971), p. 1041. ^ Both Livy (ii.8.5) and Dionysius of Halicarnassus (iv.1.2, iv.12.3, iv.19.2) assign 5 consuls to the first year of the Republic; however Polybius (iii.22.1), a historian considered very reliable and having access to an older tradition, names only Brutus and Horatius as consuls for this year. Various theories have been offered to explain this contradiction. For example, Gary Forsythe argues that Polybius accurately reports the names of the first pair of consuls, while Livy and Dionysius follow "the later annalistic tradition". (Forsythe, A Critical History of Early Rome (Berkley: University of California, 2005), p. 153) ^ These consuls are omitted by Livy, likely due to confusion with the consuls of 506 BC ^ So Dionysius of Halicarnassus (v.36.1) and others. Livy (ii.15.1), however, names another pair: P. Lucretius and P. Valerius Poplicola. Alan Samuel explains this difference as Lucretius being an error for Larcius, due to confusion with Poplicola's colleague in 508 and 504 BC. (Samuel, Greek and Roman Chronology (Muenchen: Beck'sche, 1972), p. 256) ^ This pair of consuls as well as those of 489 BC are omitted by Livy. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae af ag ah ai aj ak al am an ao ap aq ar as at au av aw ax ay az ba bb bc bd be bf bg bh bi bj bk bl bm bn bo bp bq br bs bt bu bv bw bx by bz ca cb cc cd ce cf The order of these consuls was reversed in the Fasti Capitolini after Augustus and other patricians falsified the list in order to enhance the prestige of their ancestors (by placing them as consuls prior). Cf. Taylor, "Augustan Editing in the Capitoline Fasti", pp. 73–80. ^ So the Fasti Capitolini; both Livy and Dionysisus of Halicarnassus call him simply C. Servilius. Diodorus Siculus (XI.52.1) names C. Cornelius Lentulus as the colleague of Mamercus (Samuel, Greek and Roman Chronology, p. 256) ^ Both Livy and Dionysius of Halicarnassus omit all mention of this suffect consul. ^ Aulus Gellius (17.21.13) names a different pair of consuls for this year: Menenius Agrippa and M. Horatius Pulvillus. B.W. Frier suggests his source may have been the Chronica of Cornelius Nepos, "who is cited three times in this passage". (Frier, "Licinius Macer and the Consules Suffecti of 444 B. C.", Transactions of the American Philological Association, 105 (1975), p. 84) ^ So Dionysius of Halicarnassus (IX.37.2) and Fasti Capitolini, which Livy admits is an alternative to the man he names as Mamercus' colleague, Opet. Verginius (II.54.3). Diodorus Siculus (XI.65.1) names L. Stoudios Iulius as Mamercus' colleague. (Samuel, Greek and Roman Chronology, p. 256) ^ R. M. Ogilvie opens his article on the line containing the consuls for this year with the words "One of the outstanding puzzles of the Capitoline Fasti." ("The Consul of 458 B.C.", Hermes, 89 (1961), pp. 379-382) The Fasti Capitolini adds a suffect consul with the cognomen Carve[tus] or Carve[ntanus] for the suffect of this year; Livy (III.25.1) names only the consuls L. Minucius and C. Nautius for this year, as does Dionysius of Halicarnassus (X.22.1; XI.20.1); Diodorus Siculus XI.88.1 gives L. Minucius the cognomen Karoutianos; the late sources the Chronicle Pascal and the Fasti Hydratus both present the cognomen Atratinus. Based on these contradictory entries, Ogilvie notes that it "was the practice of the Annalists to collect together whatever material from whatever sources they could and to combine evidence from the tabulae pontificum, inscriptions, monuments and family tradition" and claims to have found here an example of such an interpolation. ^ Diodorus Siculus (XII.3.1) instead lists the consuls for this year as L. Quinctius Cincinnatus and M. Fabius Vibulanus ^ Livy mentions Claudius and Genucius as being elected consuls, but resigning to allow the Decemviri to take office (III.33); Diodorus Siculus mentions them only as Decemviri (XII.23.1). ^ Two different praenomina have been reported for this person: Publius and Servius. If he was P. Sulpicius Camerinus Cornutus, he would be identical with an officer who fought the Volscians in 446 BC under the consuls Quinctius and Furius; if he was Ser. Sulpicius Camerinus Cornutus, he would be identical with the consul of 461 BC; in either case, this Decemvir was one of three ambassadors sent to Greece to study their laws. (Broughton, Magistrates of the Roman Republic, vol. 1, p. 46 n. 4, p. 51 and note) ^ Three different praenomina have been reported for this person: Spurius, Lucius, and Titus. If he was T. Veturius Crassus Cicurinus, he would be identical with the consul of 462 BC; if he was C. Veturius Crassus Cicurinus (in Old Roman cursive, "C", "S" and "L" are similar enough that it is not unreasonable to assume they could be confused), he would be identical with the consul of 455 BC. (Broughton, Magistrates of the Roman Republic, vol. 1, p. 46 n. 3 ^ His praenomen is not preserved in Fasti Capitolini, but ancient authors disagree. Livy gives "Marcus" and later "Lucius", Diodorus Siculus gives "Caius", and Dionysius of Halicarnassus gives "Marcus". (Broughton, Magistrates of the Roman Republic, vol. 1, p. 47 n. 3) ^ Livy (IV.7.10) adds this pair of consuls, based on Macer's reading of the libri lintei; however they are not mentioned by Diodorus Siculus, and according to Cicero these two consuls became Rome's first pair of censors the following year. As a result modern authorities eliminate the consuls, the consular tribunes, or attempt to fit both into 444 BC. B.W. Frier argues that this textual issue "reflects an important historiographic conflict in the late Roman Republic." (Frier, "Licinius Macer", p. 79; this is the thesis of his article.) ^ Livy (IV.12.6) records his praenomen as Lucius, while Diodorus Siculus (XII.36.1) gives it as Titus. ^ Livy (IV.23.1–3) states Gaius Julius Iullus and Lucius Verginius Tricostus were re-elected consuls, based on the testimony of Licinius Macer, while admitting Valerius Antias and Aelius Tubero both report M. Manlius Capitolinus and Q. Sulpicius Camerinus Praetextatus as consuls. Diodorus (XII.53.1) includes Manlius and Sulpicius with Ser. Cornelius Cossus as Consular Tribunes for the year. Broughton: "Of the three possibilities listed ... it seems least likely that the consuls of 435 continued in office this year. The second pair of Consuls are repeated in the other tradition which reported Military Tribunes with consular powers." (Magistrates of the Roman Republic, vol. 1, p. 62 n. 1) ^ Cicero (De Re Publica 2.60), when referring to the consul of this year, calls him P. Papirius while Diodorus Siculus (xii, 72.1) calls him C. Papirius ^ Diodorus Siculus (XII.77.1) inserts the pair L. Quinctius Cincinnatus and A. Sempronius Atratinus between the consuls of 428 and 427 BC. ^ So Diodorus Siculus (XII.82.1), whose reading is favored by Broughton; Livy names this consular tribune Naevius Rutilius, but in another passage (IV.35.6) states all four consular tribunes are Patricians, and in a third passage (IV.44.13) calls him Nautius Rutilus. ^ So Broughton (Magistrates of the Roman Republic, vol. 1, p. 69) following Degrassi, which is the praenomen Livy (IV.43.1) gives; the Fasti Capitolini has "N." which is a much more common praenomen for the gens Fabii than Gnaeus. This praenomen would also indicate he is identical to the consular tribune of 415 and 407 BC, N. Fabius Vibulanus. ^ Livy (IV.44.1) calls him L. Quinctius Cincinnatus III; the Fasti Capitolini reads [...] Cincinnatus II which would indicate he was T. Quinctius Pennus Cincinnatus II ^ So Diodorus Siculus (XIII.7.1); Livy has here Sp. Rutilius Crassus Cicurinus, but none of the Rutilii appear in the Fasti for the next 250 years, and neither do they use the praenomen Spurius or the cognomen Crassus. (Broughton, Magistrates of the Roman Republic, vol. 1, p. 73 n.1) ^ So Livy (IV.52.4), following Licinius Macer who attributed this reading to the libri lintei; Fasti derived from the Fasti Capitolini show it was Marcus Papirius Mugillanus. Ogilvie notes that "is the only instance of a Papirius being attributed the cognomen Atratinus which is common among, if not confined to, the Sempronii", and on this basis argues that "the original list of 411 will have been a college of three consular tribunes, Papirius, Sempronius and Nautius". (Ogilvie, "Consul of 458 BC", pp. 380f) ^ Livy (IV.61.4) instead has Gaius Fabius Ambustus, and treats him as a different person than the Consular Tribune of 401, 395 and 390 BC. ^ Livy adds to this college the two Censors M. Furius Camillus and M. Postumius Albinus Regillensis. (Broughton, Magistrates of the Roman Republic, vol. 1 p. 82 n. 1) ^ The Fasti Capitolini is damaged where the cognomen would appear; Broughton suggests three identifications: P. Cornelius Scipio (Consular tribune 395 BC), P. Cornelius Cossos (consular tribune 395 BC) or P. Cornelius Maluginensis (consular tribune 397 BC). (Magistrates of the Roman Republic, vol. 1, p. 90 n. 1) ^ Livy (5.29.2) omits all reference to Valerius and Cornelius, presenting L. Lucretius Tricipinus Flavus and Ser. Sulpicius Camerinus as the consules ordinaires for the year. ^ Livy (5.32.1) calls him M. Aemilius Mamercinus, indicating he is a different person than the four-time consular tribune of 389 BC forward. ^ Diodorus Siculus (XV.24.1) states that there were six consular tribunes this year, but Livy only lists five; Attilio Degrassi suggests either L. Cornelius or A. Manlius for the sixth member of this college; Broughton, based on the evidence of the Fasti Capitolini, suggests A. Manlius Capitolinus. (Broughton, Magistrates of the Roman Republic, vol. 1, p. 100 n. 1) ^ These are the nine consular tribunes the Fasti Capitolini lists for this year. Livy names only six (omitting C. Sulpicius Peticus, L. Aemilius Mamercinus, and Ti. Papirius Crassus), and Diodorus Siculus eight (omitting L. Papirius Mugillanus). Broughton notes, "Clearly Fast. Cap. has the most seriously interpolated tradition." (Magistrates of the Roman Republic, vol. 1 p. 106 n. 1) ^ a b These two consular tribunes are only known from Diodorus Siculus (XV.51.1). Broughton suggests "Erenucius" may be a corruption of "Genucius" or "Minucius". (Magistrates of the Roman Republic, vol. 1, p. 106 n. 1) ^ a b These two consular tribunes are only known from Livy (6.31.1) ^ Modern scholarly consensus is that the fasti for the fourth century was discovered to be missing several sets of eponymous magistrates, and explained this gap by stating elections were blocked by these two tribunes. See the discussions of T.J. Cornell, The Beginnings of Rome (London: Routeledge, 1995), pp. 399-402; and Forsythe, Critical History of Early Rome, pp. 368-70 ^ a b The Fasti Capitolini states C. Licinius Calvus was consul in 364 BC and C. Lincinius Stolo in 361 BC; however Livy reverses these two. ^ Livy (7.18.10) notes that "in some annals" M. Popillius Laenas appears instead of Quinctius. ^ Diodorus Siculus (XVI.59.1) reports instead the consuls for this year were M. Aemilius and T. Quinctius. ^ a b c d The years 333, 324, 309 and 301 BC come from the Fasti Capitolini, but are not evidenced in other authorities, such as Livy, Diodorus Siculus, or Cicero. A. Drummond has persuasively argued that they are the introduction of the antiquarian Titus Pomponius Atticus (whose work is better known as the Varronian Chronology, which was adopted by the Fasti Capitolini) both to fix the synchronization of the Battle of Allia to 390 BC, and to provide precedent for Julius Caesar's use of annual dictatorships. "The Dictator Years", Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte, 27 (1978), pp. 550-572 ^ Broughton admits that the primary sources -- Livy, Diodorus Siculus, and the lists derived from the Fasti Capitolini -- "admit of four different identifications for Plautius and two for Cornelius". Plautius may be C. Plautius Proculus (cos. 358 BC); P. Plautius Proculus, an otherwise unattested son of the consul; C. Plautius Decianus (cos. 329 BC); or C. Plautius Venno/Vennox, a brother of the consul of 330 BC. Likewise, P. Cornelius could be P. Cornelius Scapula or P. Cornelius Scipio Barbatus. (Magistrates of the Roman Republic, vol. 1, p. 145 n. 1) ^ Livy (8.37.2-3) would prefer Aemilius to Aulius, but notes this form is found in some annals, and describes Aulius as consul iterum in 319 BC. ^ Livy (9.15.11) notes one source instead names as consul L. Papirius Mugillanus. ^ So Broughton; Munzer (De Gente Valeria 50, no. 50 and 38, n. 8) identifies this M. Valerius Maximus with M. Valerius Maximus Corvinus, consul in 312 and 289 BC. For the period 289-285 BC the only authorities for this list are late sources such as the "Chronography of 354", Fasti Hydratus and the Pascal Chronicle, which are often corrupt. (Magistrates of the Roman Republic, vol. 1, p. 186 n. 1) ^ For some reason Laevinus and Scaevola never entered office, and in their place Catulus and Philo served as consuls. (Broughton, Magistrates of the Roman Republic, vol. 1, p. 235) ^ Killed before taking office. Cf. Broughton, vol. I, pp. 253, 257 (note 1). ^ Election declared invalid. Cf. Broughton, vol. I, pp. 254, 257 (note 3). ^ Unless otherwise noted, consuls from 100 BC through 81 BC are taken from Thomas Robert Shannon Broughton, The Magistrates of the Roman Republic. Philological Monograph No. 15. New York: American Philological Association, 1951 ^ Unless otherwise noted, consuls from 80 BC through 1 BC are taken from Ronald Syme, The Augustan Aristocracy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986), pp. 455-458 ^ Metellus died early in 68 BC; Vatia was elected to replace him, but Vatia died before he could enter office and Marcius continued as sole consul. (Dio 36.4.1; Broughton, Magistrates vol. II p. 137) ^ P. Cornelius Sulla and P. Antonius Paetus were elected consuls, but both were convicted of bribery under the Calpurnian Law. L. Aurelius Cotta and L. Manlius Torquatus were their replacements ^ a b c Dates of succession for this year are taken from John Bodel, "Chronology and Succession 2: Notes on Some Consular Lists on Stone", Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 105 (1995), p. 285 ^ Dates of succession for this year are taken from Bodel, "Chronology and Succession", p. 280 ^ a b Dates of succession for this year are taken from Bodel, "Chronology and Succession", p. 287 ^ Dates of succession for this year are taken from Darryl A. Phillips, "The Conspiracy of Egnatius Rufus and the Election of Suffect Consuls under Augustus", Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte, 46 (1997), pp. 106f ^ Aulus Terentius Varro Murena was consul designate for 23 BC, but died before taking office – see Swan, Michael (1967). "The Consular Fasti of 23 B.C. and the Conspiracy of Varro Murena". Harvard Studies in Classical Philology. Harvard University Press. 71: 235–247. doi:10.2307/310766. JSTOR 310766. ^ Augustus was apparently intended to be the other consul ordinarius, but never took office. Dates of succession for this year are taken from Phillips, "Conspiracy of Egnatius Rufus", p. 107 ^ Dates of succession for this year are taken from Phillips, "Conspiracy of Egnatius Rufus", p. 107 ^ Dates of succession for this year are taken from Phillips, "Conspiracy of Egnatius Rufus", pp. 107f ^ Dates of succession for this year are taken from Bodel, "Chronology and Succession", p. 289 ^ Unless otherwise noted, consuls from AD 1 through AD 12 are taken from Ronald Syme, The Augustan Aristocracy, (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986), pp. 455–458 ^ The consuls of this year are taken from Diana Gorostidi Pi, "Sui consoli dell’anno 13 d.C.: Nuovi dati dai fasti consulares Tusculani", Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 189 (2014), pg 265–275 ^ Unless otherwise indicated, the names and dates for the years AD 14–36 are taken from Alison E. Cooley, The Cambridge Manual of Latin Epigraphy (Cambridge: University Press, 2012), pp.458-460 ^ Cooley indicates no suffect consuls for this year ^ Tacitus, Ann., IV, 28. ^ Der Neue Pauly, Stuttgardiae 1999, T. 12/2, c. 177 ^ The dates of the consuls in this year is taken from John Bodel, "Chronology and Succession 2: Notes on Some Consular Lists on Stone", Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 105 (1995), p. 296 ^ First proposed by Hans-Georg Pflaum, and accepted by Ladislaus Vidman (Fasti Ostienses, 2nd edition, p. 68); Cooley offers as a possible alternative A. Didius Gallus although she also puts him in the last nundinium of 39. ^ Unless otherwise indicated, the names and dates for the years AD 37–40 are taken from Paul Gallivan, "The Fasti for the Reign of Gaius", Antichthon, 13 (1979), p. 66–69 ^ Unless otherwise indicated, the names and dates for the years AD 41-54 are taken from Gallivan, "The Fasti for the Reign of Claudius", Classical Quarterly, 28 (1978), pp. 407–426 ^ M. Christol and S. Demougin have shown that the colleague of P. Suillius Rufus is not the governor of Britain, but another member of the gens Ostoria ("Notes de prosopographie équestre", in Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 57 (1984), pp. 171-8). ^ Gallivan's source (Gaius Institutes, 3.63) does not indicate which months Cornelius held office. ^ In a re-examination of the primary source, Camodeca has shown that the consul "L. S[...]" is a phantom, and it has been removed from this list. ("I consoli del 43 e gli Antistii Veteres d'età claudia dalla riedizione delle Tabulae Herculanenses", Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 140 (2002), pp. 227–236 ^ Camodeca concludes that the former reading, L. Oppius, is erroneous, and that the initial is certainly 'S', probably followed by 'p', but the name is definitely not Sex. This late occurrence of the praenomen indicates that the consul was probably descended from the praetor Spurius Oppius of 44 BC, and recalls the decemvir Spurius Oppius Cornicen. "I consoli del 43", pp. 230, 232, 233. ^ Suffect consuls for July–December Gallivan placed in 44 Camodeca moved to 47 ("Novità sui fasti consolari delle tavolette cerate della Campania", Publications de l'École française de Rome, 143 (1991), p. 52) ^ Giuseppe Camodeca, "I consoli del 43 e gli Antistii Veteres d'età claudia dalla riedizione delle Tabulae Herculanenses", Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 140 (2002), pp. 234–236. ^ See Camodeca, "Novità sui fasti consolari", p. 52 ^ Giuseppe Camodeca argues that Gallivan mistakenly followed an error by the writer of Tabula Pompeiana 41, and combined the two Vipstani into one person; other wax tablets dated to that year show the two suffect consuls as separate people. ("Novità sui fasti consolari", p. 53) ^ Gallivan shows Aefulanus held his office in this year, but not which month. ^ Names and dates for 55 and 56 taken from Giuseppe Camodeca, "I consoli des 55–56 e un nuovo collega di seneca nel consolato: P. Cornelius Dolabella (TP.75 [=1401 +135)*", Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 63 (1986), pp. 201–215. ^ Camodeca allocates January–April to Vetus, while Werner Eck, Historia, 24 (1975), pp. 338 ff. extends his tenure to June. ^ Unless otherwise indicated, the names and dates for the years 57-67 are taken from Gallivan, "Some Comments on the Fasti for the Reign of Nero", Classical Quarterly, 24 (1974), pp. 290–311 ^ Names and dates for 62 taken from Eck, "Miscellanea prosopographica", Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 42 (1981), pp. 227 ff. ^ George Houston points out that this consul had no attested cognomen, and "Celsus" was added based on a preliminary reading of a wax table from Pompeii, CIL IV.3340.151. "P. Marius P.f., Cos. Ord. A.D. 62", ZPE 16 (1975), pp. 33–35 ^ Giuseppe Camodeca reads C. Junius Marullus ("I consoli degli anni di Nerone nelle 'Tabulae Herculanenses'", Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 193 (2015), p. 277) ^ Camodeca reads P. Petronius Niger ("I consoli degli anni di Nerone", p. 276) ^ Gallivan, "Reign of Nero" followed Degrassi in assuming that the ordinary consul for this year was named "A. Licinius Nerva Silianus P. Pasidienus Firmus", a case of polyonymy. A military diploma published later (AE 1978, 658) shows they are two different people. ^ a b Gallivan, "Reign of Nero", placed Appius Annius Gallus and Severus in 66 and Marcus Annius Afrinus and Africanus in 67; however Camodeca published one of the Tabulae Herculei that shows Appius Annius Gallus and Severus were suffect consuls 4 November of an unknown year -- thus proving their office was in 67. (AE 1993, 460 = Bolletino del Centro internazionale per lo studio dei papiri ercolanesi, 23 (1993), 109-119) ^ Names and dates for this year are taken from Camodeca, "I consoli degli anni di Nerone", p. 281 ^ Names and dates for this year are taken from G. B. Townend, "The Consuls of A. D. 69/70", American Journal of Philology, 83 (1962), pp. 113–129 ^ Unless otherwise indicated, the names and dates for the years 70–96 are taken from Paul Gallivan, "The Fasti for A. D. 70–96", Classical Quarterly, 31 (1981), pp. 186–220 ^ a b Gallivan dated M. Ulpius Traianus (father of Trajan) to 70 based on his arrangement of the fragments of tablet E of the Fasti Ostienses (p. 187); however, subsequent recovery of fragments allowed Ladislav Vidman to date Ulpius Traianus' tenure to 72 (Vidman, Fasti Ostienses, pp. 73-75). AE 1978, 60 proves that C. Licinius Mucianus was suffect consul for that nundinium; redating Ulpius Traianus is the only change required. ^ The suffect consuls for September–October are attested in 80 by the Fasti Septempeda, a primary source. ^ This pair of suffects added from Camodeca, "Novità sui fasti consolari", pp. 57–62 ^ Gallivan ("Fasti for A. D. 70–96", pp. 206, 219) dated this pair of suffects to 30 December "71-72"; because Camodeca added the consuls for November–December 71, they are placed here. ^ All that survives of this suffect's name on the Fasti Feriarum Latinarum (CIL VI, 2242) ^ AE 1968, 7 restores this as "Sex. Iulius Fr]on[tinus", stating he is attested as suffect consul in June. ^ Grainger, John D. (2004). Nerva and the Roman Succession Crisis of AD 96–99. London: Routledge. p. 14. ISBN 0203218078. ^ See Syme, "P. Calvisius Ruso. One Person or Two?" Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 56 (1984), pp. 173-192 ^ Gallivan ("Fasti for A. D. 70–96", pp. 209, 219) dated this pair of suffects to "79-80"; this is the only open office in those two years, so he is placed here. ^ a b c Added from the Fasti Septempeda (AE 1998, 419) ^ All that survives of this suffect's name on the Fasti Ostienses (frag. Fa) ^ So Gallivan. Werner Eck suggests instead M. Mettius Modestus. "Epigraphische Untersuchungen zu Konsuln und Senatoren des 1.-3. Jh. n. Chr.", Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 37 (1980), pp. 51-60 ^ CIL IX, 5420 dates Patruinus to this nundinium, and Werner Eck ("Epigraphische Untersuchungen zu Konsuln und Senatoren des 1.-3. Jh. n. Chr.", Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 37 (1980), pp. 51-60) restores the deleted name as Saturninus'. ^ For the suffect consuls Gallivan placed in July/August of this year see List of undated Roman consuls and note. ^ This person is a puzzle. G.B. Townend stated he was the son of the suffect consul of 70 and 74, but that means the older Petillius either held the fasces late in life, or had his son very young. Gallivan suggests that this may actually be the third consulship of Petilius. (Gallivan, "The Fasti for A. D. 70–96", p. 212) ^ Syme first proposed the identification of this consul with M. Raecius Gallus ("Pliny the Procurator", Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, 73 (1969), pp. 201–236 [p. 229]). However, he later concluded that Publius Glitius Gallus "is on every count a better candidate" than Raecius ("P. Calvisius Ruso. One Person or Two?", Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 56 (1984), pp. 173-192 [p. 175]). ^ Syme raised the possibility that L. Valerius Catullus Messallinus was the second consul ordinarius for this year Journal of Roman Studies, 43 (1953), p. 155), a suggestion shared by H. Nesselhauf (Gnomon 26 (1954), p. 270); however, Vidman has found an inscription which is dated a.d. X k. Februarias Imp. Domitiano XI, T. Aurelio Fulvo it(terum) co(n)sulibus, showing that Fulvus was the consul posterior for this year. (Fasti Ostienses, pp. 78f) ^ This pair of suffects taken from Eck and Pangerl, "Neue Diplome mit den Namen von Konsuln und Statthaltern", Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 187 (2013), pp. 274f ^ a b Evidence is lacking to determine whether Campanus served until April, or an unknown person held the fasces in March and April. ^ So AE 2012, 1959; Gallivan "Bellicus", following CIL VI, 2065 ^ Or M. Tuccius Cerialis, a consular mentioned by Pliny (Epistulae, II.11.9) ^ Names and dates for this year are taken from Werner Eck, "Diplome, Konsuln und Statthalter: Fortschritte und Probleme der kaiserzeitlichen Prosopographie", Chiron, 34 (2004), pp. 35-44. ^ AE 2008, 1753 ^ Unless otherwise noted, the consuls for this year are taken from Fausto Zevi "I consoli del 97 d. Cr. in due framenti gia' editi dei Fasti Ostienses", Listy filologické / Folia philologica, 96 (1973), pp. 125–137 ^ All that survives of the consul's name on the Fasti ostienses is "..]us", which Zevi had plausibly restored as Lucius Licinius Sura. However, two more recently recovered fragments of military diplomas show that the name of this consul is L. Pomponius Maternus, who is otherwise unknown. (Eck and Pangerl, "Zwei Konstitutionen für die Truppen Niedermösiens vom 9. September 97", Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 151 (2005), pp. 185-192 ^ So Zevi; Cooley offers no colleague for Tacitus. Peter Weiss has argued, based on more recently recovered evidence, that Scapula could have been suffect consul in September–October 99, or even later. (Weiss, "Weitere Diplomfragmente von Moesia Inferior", Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 124 (1999), pp. 287-289 ^ Unless otherwise indicated, the names and dates for the years 98 - 100 are taken from Cooley, Cambridge Manual of Latin Epigraphy, pp. 466f ^ This pair of suffects added from Vidman (Fasti Ostienses, p. 94), following Syme's suggestion (review of Degrassi, I Fasti Consolari dell' Impero Romano dal 30 Av anti Christo al 613 Dopo Christo in Journal of Roman Studies, 43 (1953), p. 154) ^ Placed in this year by Mommsen. ^ Unless otherwise indicated, the names and dates for the years 101 through 115 are taken from Cooley, Cambridge Manual of Latin Epigraphy, pp. 467f ^ Added from Werner Eck, "Jahres- und Provinzialfastern der senatorischen Statthalter von 69/70 bis 138/139", Chiron, 12 (1982), p. 327 n.181 ^ Added from AE 2013, 650 ^ As proposed by Syme, "People in Pliny", Journal of Roman Studies, 58 (1968), pp. 139f ^ It is uncertain which ordinary consul Acilius Rufus replaced. ^ Fasti ostiensis reads ...] Rufu[s]; Attilo Degrassi and Vidman restore this name as "L. Acilius Rufus", while Ronald Syme restores it as "M. Acilius Rufus" (Syme, "Superior Suffect Consuls", Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 58 (1985), pp. 239-242) ^ This pair of consuls added from AE 2004, 1898 ^ Added from Evgeni I. Paunov and Margaret M. Roxan, "The Earliest Extant Diploma of Thrace, AD 114 (=RMD I 14)", Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 119 (1997), pp. 269–279. ^ The praenomen Marcus is attested by an inscription dated 1 September. (AE 1998, 1727) ^ Unless otherwise indicated, the names and dates for the years 116 and 117 are taken from Werner Eck, "Konsuln des Jahres 117 in Militärdiplomen Traians mit Tribunicia Potestas XX", Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 185 (2013), pp. 235–238 ^ All that survives of the name on the Fasti ostienses. Suggested restorations include Q. Cornelius Senecio Annainus (favored by Cooley) and Q. Coelius Honoratus. (Vidman Fasti Ostienses, 2nd edition, p. 114) ^ a b The names and dates for this year are taken from Cooley, Cambridge Manual of Latin Epigraphy, p. 469 ^ The names and dates for this year are taken from Werner Eck and Andreas Pangerl, "Neue Diplome mit den Namen von Konsuln und Statthaltern," Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 187 (2013), p. 282 ^ The names and dates for 120 and 121 are taken from Werner Eck and Andreas Pangerl, "Ein Consul Suffectus Q. Aburnius in drei fragmentarischen Diplomen", Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 185 (2013), pp. 239–247 ^ W. Eck, A. Pangerl,"Neue Diplome aus der Zeit Hadrians für die beiden mösischen Provinzen", Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 207 (2018), pp. 219-224 ^ The names and dates for this year are taken from Eck and Pangerl, "Neue Diplome," pp. 287f ^ Unless otherwise indicated, the names and dates for the years 124 through 130 are taken from Cooley, Cambridge Manual of Latin Epigraphy, pp. 469f ^ Werner Eck and Andreas Pangerl had previously reconstructed the gentilium of this otherwise unknown person as "Accena", but a more recently discovered military diploma proved this is his correct name. Eck and Pangerl, "Eine Konstitution für das Herr von Moesia Inferior vom 1. Juni 125 in fünf Diplomen", Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 188 (2014), pp. 245–249 ^ All that survives from the Fasti ostienses is the praenomen; Vidman suggests this restoration (Vidman, Fasti Ostienses, p. 118) ^ All that survives from the Fasti ostienses is the praenomen; Cooley suggests this restoration. ^ Unless otherwise noted, the names and dates for the consuls from 131 to 135 are taken from Werner Eck, Paul Holder and Andreas Pangerl, "A Diploma for the Army of Britain in 132 and Hadrian's Return to Rome from the East", Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 174 (2010), p. 194. The structure of the nundinia presented for those years is also used here. ^ Unless otherwise indicated, the names and dates for the years 136 and 137 are taken from Cooley, Cambridge Manual of Latin Epigraphy, p. 471 ^ Unless otherwise noted, consuls from 138 to 161 are taken from Werner Eck, "Die Fasti consulares der Regungszeit des Antoninus Pius, eine Bestandsaufnahme seit Géza Alföldys Konsulat und Senatorenstand" in Studia epigraphica in memoriam Géza Alföldy, hg. W. Eck, B. Feher, and P. Kovács (Bonn, 2013), pp. 69–90 ^ a b Werner Eck and Peter Weiß have shown a fragment of a military diploma proves that the suffect consuls previously allocated to 165 are correctly placed in 142. "Tusidius Campester, cos. suff. unter Antoninus Pius, und die Fasti Ostienses der Jahrec141/142 n. Chr.", Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 134 (2001), pp. 251-260 ^ So Eck ("Die Fasti consulares", p.75) and James H. Oliver ("The Solonian Constitution and a Consul of A.D. 149", Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 13 (1972), pp. 103-107) separately. Alföldy identifies this consul with Servius Cornelius Scipio Salvidienus Orfitus, proconsul of Africa 163/164 (Konsulat und Senatorenstand, p. 153) ^ AE 1947, 59, as restored by Alföldy; Eck accepts this restoration. ^ Thus Ronald Syme and Alföldy. Fasti ostiensis reads ...]imus; Attilo Degrassi reads "C. Julius Maximus". (Eck, "Die Fasti consulares", p. 76) ^ Fasti ostiensis reads [...]cus; Eck restores the name as the legate of Legio III (Eck, "Die Fasti consulares", p. 77) ^ All that survives from the Fasti ostienses is the praenomen; Eck accepts this restoration by Alföldy. ^ Identified by Alföldy as M. Gavius Appalius Maximus. (Eck, "Die Fasti consulares", p. 77 n. 24) ^ The son of the son of the suffect consul of 123. (Eck, "Die Fasti consulares", p. 77) ^ Or Q. Virius Larcius Sulpicius, both suggested by Eck. The inscription these suggestions are based on, IGR III 667 reads Q. V[...]SV[...]clus. (Eck, "Die Fasti consulares", p. 79) ^ Eck suggests that he may be identical to C. Septimus Severus, proconsul of Africa. ^ All that survives of this suffect's name on the diploma CIL XVI, 130 ^ Ladislav Vidman, "Ein neuer Konsul des Jahres 160", Listy filologické / Folia philologica, 100 (1977), pp. 199–203 ^ Unless otherwise noted, consuls from 162 to 180 are taken from Géza Alföldy, Konsulat und Senatorenstand unter der Antoninen (Bonn: Rudolf Habelt Verlag, 1977), pp. 176-191 ^ W. Eck, A. Pangerl, "Eine neue Bürgerrechtskonstitution für die Truppen von Pannonia inferior aus dem Jahr 162 mit einem neuen Konsulnpaar", Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 173 (2010), pp. 223-236 ^ P. A. Holder, Roman Military Diplomas V, (2006), p. 861 ^ C. Römer, "Diplom für einen Fußsoldaten aus Koptos vom 23. März 179", Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 82 (1990), pp. 137–153 ^ Ioan Piso and Doina Benea, "Das Militärdiplom von Drobeta", Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 56 (1984), pp. 263ff ^ Unless otherwise noted, consuls from 181 to 235 are taken from Paul M. M. Leunissen, Konsuln und Konsulare in der Zeit von Commodus bis Severus Alexander, (Amsterdam: Verlag Gieben, 1989), pp. 129-137 ^ David Stone Potter, The Roman Empire at bay, AD 180–395 (2006), pg. 72 ^ CIL VI, 2100 reads ..]vo or (nominative) ...]vus for Rufus' colleague. This is the most frequent restoration. ^ Leunissen disagrees with Dessau, Groag, and Barbieri that the gentilium of this suffect consul could be Atulenus. (Leunissen, Konsuln und Konsulare, p. 132 n. 20) ^ The suffects for this year are taken from Peter Weiß, "Konstitutionen eines toten Kaisers: Militärdiplome von Commodus aus dem Jahr 193 n. Chr.", PHAROS Studien zur griechisch-römischen Antike. Verlag Marie Leidorf GmbH, Rahden 2015. Verlag Marie Leidorf GmbH, Rahden 2015, pp. 273–280. ^ Fabius Cilo was possibly a colleague of Silius Messalla. Peter Weiß, p. 277. ^ The sources disagree on his praenomen: CIL XIII, 1754 attests "L.", while CIL VIII, 8937 attests "C." ^ Suffectus in absentia. It is uncertain which consul he replaced. (Leunissen, Konsuln und Konsulare, p. 134 and note) ^ This pair of suffect consuls taken from Werner Eck, "Prosopographische Bemerkungen zum Militärdiplom vom 20.12.202 n. Chr. Der Flottenpräfekt Aemilius Sullectinus und das Gentilnomen des Usurpators Regalianus", Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 139 (2002), pp. 208–210. ^ Added from Leunissen, p. 238 ^ This pair is attested in M. M. Roxan, Roman Military Diplomas, 3: 1985–93 (1994), no. 188 ^ His praenomen was confirmed by Askold Ivantchik, Oleg Pogorelets and Rostislav Savvov, "A New Roman Military Diploma from the Territory of the Ukraine", Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 163 (2007), pp. 255-262 ^ Andreas Krieckhaus, "Vater und Sohn. Bemerkungen zu den severischen consules ordinarii M. Munatius Sulla Cerialis und M. Munatius Sulla Urbanus", Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 153 (2005), pp. 283-284 ^ Unless otherwise noted, consuls from 236 to 285 are taken from Alan E. Samuel, Greek and Roman Chronology (München: Beck'sch, 1972), pp. 272f ^ Cognomen restored from RMD-03, 199 ^ Olivier Hekster, Nicholas Zair, Rome and Its Empire, AD 193–284 (2008), pg. 117 ^ Bowman, Alan K. The Cambridge Ancient History: The Crisis of Empire, AD. 193–337, pg. 120 ^ Diocletian assumed the ordinary consulship in the east in opposition to Carinus in Rome – see Bagnall, Consuls of the Later Roman Empire (1987), pg. 105 ^ From the Fasti Caleni, as published in Bagnall, Roger S., et al., Consuls of the Later Roman Empire (1987), p. 110 ^ From the Fasti Caleni, as published in Bagnall, Roger S., et al., Consuls of the Later Roman Empire (1987), pp. 112–113 ^ Potentially related to Vettius Rufinus, consul of 316 AD, see discussion in Bagnall, Roger S., et al., Consuls of the Later Roman Empire (1987), p. 180 ^ Proculus seems to have fallen into disgrace and Iulianus appointed for him, see T. D. Barnes, in ZPE 21 (1976), p. 280 and T. D. Barnes, The New Empire of Diocletian and Constantine, p. 102. Proculus could be identical with the proc. Africae in 319/320 AD, see Bagnall, Roger S., et al., Consuls of the Later Roman Empire (1987), p. 184. ^ Following p.Stras 137.20 and p.Stras 138.17 the first name could be Ionius instead of Julius, see discussion in Bagnall, Roger S., et al., Consuls of the Later Roman Empire (1987), p. 629f. ^ This Aëtius was not the general of the Western Empire, but comes domesticorum of the Eastern court. Bagnall, Roger S.; Cameron, Alan; Schwartz, Seth R.; Worp, Klaas A. Consuls of the later Roman Empire. Philological Monographs #36. American Philological Association, 1989, p. 443 ^ "the first consul designated by a barbarian king" according to Bagnall, Roger S.; Cameron, Alan; Schwartz, Seth R.; Worp, Klaas A. (1987). Consuls of the later Roman Empire. Philological Monographs #36. American Philological Association. p. 495. ISBN 1-55540-099-X. ^ Both consuls were Easterners – see Bagnall, Roger S.; Cameron, Alan; Schwartz, Seth R.; Worp, Klaas A. (1987). Consuls of the later Roman Empire. Philological Monographs #36. American Philological Association. p. 18. ISBN 1-55540-099-X. ^ '[P]resumably a westerner' – Bagnall, Roger S.; Cameron, Alan; Schwartz, Seth R.; Worp, Klaas A. (1987). Consuls of the later Roman Empire. Philological Monographs #36. American Philological Association. p. 524. ISBN 1-55540-099-X. ^ a b c d e Otherwise unknown ^ Vasiliev (1952), p. I 192. ^ Timothy Gregory, A History of Byzantium, (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2005), p. 227 ^ Unless otherwise noted, consuls from 535 through 613 are taken from Attilio Degrassi, I fasti consolari dell'Impero Romano dal 30 avanti Cristo al 613 dopo Cristo (Rome, 1952), pp. 99-106 ^ Latin-Greek Inscription (AE 2004, 01410) ^ a b Chapman, John. Buehler, Joe (ed.). "Catholic Encyclopedia: Maxiums of Constantinople, Saint". Eternal Word Television Network. ^ Bede (1999). Halsall, Paul (ed.). "Bede (673–734): Ecclesiastical History of the English Nation, Book V: Chapter VII". Medieval Sourcebook. Archived from the original on 2014-08-14. Retrieved 2008-01-17. ^ Justinian II adopted the title of consul for all the Julian years of his reign, consecutively numbered. ^ Thompson, Margaret (1940). "The American Excavations in the Athenian Agora: Eighteenth Report (Jul. – Sep., 1940): Some Unpublished Bronze Money of the Early Eighth Century". Hesperia. 9 (3): 358–380. doi:10.2307/146483. JSTOR 146483. Further reading[edit] Primary sources[edit] Baiterus, Georgius (1837). "Consulares Triumphalesque Romanorum ad Fidem Optimorum Auctorum". In von Orelli, Johann Caspar (ed.). M. Tullii Ciceronis opera quae supersunt omnia, ac deperditorum (in Latin). Volume 12. Turici: Typis Orelli, Fuesslini et Sociorum. B. Bargaglia and C. Grosso, I Fasti Ostienses, Itinerari Ostiensi 8 (1997). Attilio Degrassi. Fasti Capitolini. n.p.: G. B. Paravia, 1954 An English translation of one version of this primary source can be found on attalus.org Mommsen, Theodor; Pearse, Roger, eds. (2006) [1892]. "Part 8: List (fasti) of the consuls to 354 AD". Chronography of 354. The Tertullian Project. Ladislav Vidman (ed.), Fasti ostienses. First edition: Praha: Československá Akademie Věd, 1957. Second edition: Praha: Academia, 1982 Richard W. Burgess, "'Non Duo Antonini Sed Duo Augusti' The Consuls of 161 and the Origins and Traditions of the Latin Consular Fasti of the Roman Empire", Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 132 (2000), pp. 259–290 Secondary sources[edit] Alföldy, Géza (1977). Konsulat und Senatorenstand unter den Antoninen (in German). Bonn: Habelt Verlag. Bagnall, Roger S.; Cameron, Alan; Schwartz, Seth R.; Worp, Klaas A. (1987). Consuls of the Later Roman Empire. Philological Monographs #36. American Philological Association. ISBN 1-55540-099-X. Broughton, Thomas Robert Shannon; Patterson, Marcia L. (Collaborator) (1986). The Magistrates of the Roman Republic. Philological Monograph No. 15. American Philological Association. ISBN 0-89130-811-3. Camodeca, Giuseppe (1986). "I consoli des 55–56 e un nuovo collega di seneca nel consolato: P. Cornelius Dolabella (TP.75 [=1401 +135)*". Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik (in Italian). 63: 201–215. Camodeca, Giuseppe (1991). "Epigrafia. Actes du Colloque international d'epigraphie latine en mémoire de Attilio Degrassi etc". Collection de l’ecole française de Rome 143 (in Italian). Rome: 45–74. Cite journal requires |journal= (help); |contribution= ignored (help) Degrassi, Attilio (1952). I fasti consolari dell'impero romano dal 30 avanti Cristo al 613 dopo Cristo (in Italian). Roma. Eck, Werner (1970). Senatoren von Vespasian bis Hadrian (in German). München: Beck. Eck, Werner (1975). "Ergänzungen zu den Fasti Consulares des 1. und 2. Jh.n.Chr". Historia (in German). 24: 324–344. Gallivan, Paul A. (1974). "Some Comments on the Fasti for the Reign of Nero". Classical Quarterly. New Series. 24 (2): 290–311. doi:10.1017/S0009838800032821. Gallivan, Paul A. (1978). "The Fasti for the Reign of Claudius". Classical Quarterly. 28 (2): 407–426. doi:10.1017/S0009838800034959. Ginsburg, Judith R. (1981). "Nero's Consular Policy". American Journal of Ancient History. 6 (1): 51–68. Leunissen, Paul (1989). Konsuln und Konsulare in der Zeit von Commodus bis Severus Alexander (in German). Amsterdam: Verlag Gieben. Mennen, Inge (2011). Power and Status in the Roman Empire, AD 193–284. BRILL. Peck, Harry Thurston, ed. (1897). "Consules". Harper's Dictionary of Classical Literature and Antiquities (Second ed.). p. 406. Smith, William, ed. (1859). "Consul". A Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities (Second ed.). Boston: Little, Brown, and Company. pp. 352–356. Smith, William; Anthon, Charles, eds. (1886). "Fasti Consulares". A Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities (Third American Carefully Revised ed.). New York: Harper & Brothers, Publishers. pp. 1075–1092. Tortoriello, Annalisa (2004). I fasti consolari degli anni di Claudio (in Italian). Roma: Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei. External links[edit] Livius.org: Varronian chronology v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Roman_consuls&oldid=996813759" Categories: Ancient timelines Lists of office-holders in ancient Rome Roman consuls Hidden categories: Articles with short description Short description matches Wikidata CS1 Latin-language sources (la) CS1: long volume value CS1 German-language sources (de) CS1 Italian-language sources (it) CS1 errors: missing periodical CS1 errors: chapter ignored Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Български Čeština Deutsch Eesti Français Italiano Magyar Plattdüütsch Polski Slovenčina Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Tagalog Türkçe Tiếng Việt Edit links This page was last edited on 28 December 2020, at 19:08 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2435 ---- Category:Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers - Wikipedia Help Category:Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search This category is for articles with NLA identifiers. Please do not add subcategories. For more information, see Wikipedia:Authority control. Administrators: Please do not delete this category even if it is empty! This category may be empty occasionally or even most of the time. This is a maintenance category, used for maintenance of the Wikipedia project. It is not part of the encyclopedia and contains non-article pages, or groups articles by status rather than subject. Do not include this category in content categories. This is a tracking category. It builds and maintains a list of pages primarily for the sake of the list itself. They are not part of the encyclopedia's categorization scheme. This category is hidden on its member pages—unless the corresponding user preference (appearance → show hidden categories) is set. These categories are used to track, build and organize lists of pages needing "attention en masse" (for example, pages using deprecated syntax), or that may need to be edited at someone's earliest convenience. These categories also serve to aggregate members of several lists or sub-categories into a larger, more efficient list (discriminated by classifications). Contents: Top 0–9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z * # 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 • A Aa Ae Aj Ao At • B Ba Be Bj Bo Bt • C Ca Ce Cj Co Ct • D Da De Dj Do Dt • E Ea Ee Ej Eo Et • F Fa Fe Fj Fo Ft • G Ga Ge Gj Go Gt • H Ha He Hj Ho Ht • I Ia Ie Ij Io It • J Ja Je Jj Jo Jt • K Ka Ke Kj Ko Kt • L La Le Lj Lo Lt • M Ma Me Mj Mo Mt • N Na Ne Nj No Nt • O Oa Oe Oj Oo Ot • P Pa Pe Pj Po Pt • Q Qa Qe Qj Qo Qt • R Ra Re Rj Ro Rt • S Sa Se Sj So St • T Ta Te Tj To Tt • U Ua Ue Uj Uo Ut • V Va Ve Vj Vo Vt • W Wa We Wj Wo Wt • X Xa Xe Xj Xo Xt • Y Ya Ye Yj Yo Yt • Z Za Ze Zj Zo Zt Pages in this category should only be added by Module:Authority control. Pages in category "Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers" The following 200 pages are in this category, out of approximately 35,600 total. This list may not reflect recent changes (learn more). (previous page) (next page), Yusaku Kamekura 0–9 20th Television 50 Cent The 400 Blows A Thomas Turner à Beckett A-Mei Abraham Jacob van der Aa Pieter van der Aa AABB RWTH Aachen University Bertus Aafjes Alvar Aalto Mike Aamodt A&M Records Antti Aarne Aaron Aaron ben Moses ben Asher Jason Aaron Ben Aaronovitch Sam Aaronovitch Anita Aarons Jules Aarons Alexander Aaronsohn Irving Aaronson AARP Ivar Aasen Ab Urbe Condita Libri Diego Abad de Santillán Gémino Abad Gjorgji Abadžiev Magdalena Abakanowicz Iñaki Ábalos Abaoji Firmin Abauzit ABBA Giuseppe Cesare Abba Mostafa El-Abbadi Arnaud-Michel d'Abbadie Jakob Abbadie Claudio Abbado Abbas I of Egypt Ibn Abbas Cleveland Abbe Ernst Abbe Abbey library of Saint Gall Edward Abbey John Roland Abbey Ruth Abbey Abbo Cernuus Charles Greeley Abbot George Abbot (author) George Abbot (bishop) Henry Larcom Abbot William Abbot William Wright Abbot Willis J. Abbot Benjamin Vaughan Abbott Berenice Abbott Edwin Abbott Abbott Eleanor Hallowell Abbott Elizabeth Abbott Eric Abbott Evelyn Abbott Frank Frost Abbott George Abbott H. H. Abbott Jacob Abbott James Abbott (Indian Army officer) John Stevens Cabot Abbott Katy Abbott Lawrence Fraser Abbott Lemuel Francis Abbott Lyman Abbott Pamela Abbott Sidney Abbott Thomas Kingsmill Abbott Tony Abbott Dino Abbrescia Thomas Abbt Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab Abd al-Malik ibn Marwan Anouar Abdel-Malek Muddathir Abdel-Rahim Emir Abdelkader Abdelwahab Bouhdiba Emil Abderhalden Abdul Hamid II ʻAbdu'l-Bahá Kareem Abdul-Jabbar Paula Abdul Sheikh Abdullah Aleksandr Abdulov Edward Strutt Abdy Maria Abdy Kōbō Abe Keiko Abe Masao Abe Yoshitoshi ABe Arthur William à Beckett Gilbert Abbott à Beckett Lily Abegg Martin Abegg Jean-Pierre Abel-Rémusat Annie Heloise Abel Carl Friedrich Abel Félix-Marie Abel Frederick Abel Jack Abel Niels Henrik Abel Wilhelm Abel Peter Abelard Rosa M. Abella Louis Abelly Joan Abelove Richard Abels Philip Abelson Walter Abendroth Wolfgang Abendroth Miguel Abensour John Abercrombie (guitarist) John Abercrombie (horticulturalist) John Abercrombie (physician) Lascelles Abercrombie Michael Abercrombie Minnie Abercrombie Aberdeen Art Gallery Sophie Bledsoe Aberle Ralph Abernathy John Abernethy (surgeon) Giorgio Abetti Swami Abhedananda Abhishiktananda Abingdon Abbey Willoughby Bertie, 4th Earl of Abingdon Noah Ablett Dan Abnett William de Wiveleslie Abney Åbo Akademi University Abu Sa'id Abu'l-Khayr Edmond François Valentin About Abraham Abraham ben David John Abraham Karl Abraham Max Abraham Pearl Abraham Walter Abraham Israel Abrahams Jim Abrahams Peter Abrahams Peter Abrahams (American author) Marina Abramović Harriett Abrams Herbert L. Abrams M. H. Abrams Samson Abramsky Laure Junot, Duchess of Abrantès Peter Abrassimov Isaac Abarbanel Casimiro de Abreu Capistrano de Abreu John Absolon Franz Abt Abu Bakr Abu Firas al-Hamdani Elia Abu Madi Abu Mansur al-Maturidi Nasr Abu Zayd Ibn al-Jawzi Janet Abu-Lughod Theodore Abu Qurrah Abu'l-Fazl ibn Mubarak Abulfeda Said Aburish Acacius of Constantinople Academia Sinica Academic Press Académie Française Académie nationale de chirurgie Académie royale de langue et de littérature françaises de Belgique Academy of Arts, Berlin Academy of Athens (modern) Academy of Korean Studies Academy of Lyon Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences Academy of Political Science Academy of Sciences and Arts of Bosnia and Herzegovina Academy of Sciences of Albania Academy of St Martin in the Fields Academy Palace Accademia della Crusca Accademia di Belle Arti di Firenze Torquato Accetto Friedrich Accum Ace of Base Giuseppe Acerbi Leonardus Achates Chinua Achebe Sven Tito Achen Roger Acherley (previous page) (next page) Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Wikipedia_articles_with_NLA_identifiers&oldid=846549296" Categories: Pages with NLA identifiers Wikipedia articles with authority control information Hidden categories: Hidden categories Tracking categories Template Large category TOC via CatAutoTOC on category with over 20,000 pages CatAutoTOC generates Large category TOC Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Category Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Afrikaans Asturianu تۆرکجه বাংলা Bân-lâm-gú भोजपुरी Български Dansk Ελληνικά Español Euskara فارسی 客家語/Hak-kâ-ngî 한국어 हिन्दी Ilokano Bahasa Indonesia Italiano עברית Jawa Lëtzebuergesch Македонски मराठी Bahasa Melayu Mìng-dĕ̤ng-ngṳ̄ 日本語 Nordfriisk ଓଡ଼ିଆ Português Română Sardu Scots Simple English Slovenščina Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Tagalog ไทย Türkçe اردو Vèneto Tiếng Việt 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 19 June 2018, at 12:52 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2437 ---- The History of Tom Jones, a Foundling - Wikipedia The History of Tom Jones, a Foundling From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Novel by Henry Fielding Tom Jones Title page from the 1749 edition Author Henry Fielding Original title The History of Tom Jones, a Foundling Country England Language English Genre Novel Publisher Andrew Millar Publication date 28 February 1749 The History of Tom Jones, a Foundling, often known simply as Tom Jones, is a comic novel by English playwright and novelist Henry Fielding. It is a Bildungsroman and a picaresque novel. It was first published on 28 February 1749 in London and is among the earliest English works to be classified as a novel.[1] It is the earliest novel mentioned by W. Somerset Maugham in his 1948 book Great Novelists and Their Novels among the ten best novels of the world.[2] The novel is highly organised despite its length. Samuel Taylor Coleridge argued that it has one of the "three most perfect plots ever planned", alongside Oedipus Tyrannus and The Alchemist.[3] It became a best seller with four editions published in its first year alone.[4] It is generally regarded as Fielding's greatest book and as an influential English novel.[5] Contents 1 Plot 2 Style 3 Themes 4 List of characters 5 Adaptations and influences 6 See also 7 Bibliography 7.1 Editions 7.2 Critical collections 8 References 8.1 Sources 9 External links Plot[edit] The novel's events occupy eighteen books. The book opens with the narrator stating that the purpose of the novel will be to explore "human nature". The kindly and wealthy Squire Allworthy and his sister Bridget are introduced in their wealthy estate in Somerset. Allworthy returns from London after an extended business trip and finds an abandoned baby sleeping in his bed. He summons his housekeeper, Mrs Deborah Wilkins, to take care of the child. After searching the nearby village Mrs Wilkins is told about a young woman called Jenny Jones, a servant of a schoolmaster and his wife, as the most likely person to have committed the deed. Jenny is brought before the Allworthys and admits being the baby's mother, but she refuses to reveal the father's identity. Mr Allworthy mercifully removes Jenny to a place where her reputation will be unknown and tells his sister to raise the boy, whom he names Thomas, in his household. Two brothers, Dr Blifil and Captain Blifil, regularly visit the Allworthy estate. The doctor introduces the captain to Bridget in the hope of marrying into Allworthy's wealth. The couple soon marries. After the marriage, Captain Blifil begins to show a coldness to his brother, who eventually feels obliged to leave the house for London. He does, and, soon after, he dies "of a broken heart". Captain Blifil and his wife start to grow cool towards one another, and the former is found dead from apoplexy one evening after taking his customary evening stroll before dinner. By then, he has fathered a boy who grows up with the bastard Tom. Captain Blifil's son, known as Master Blifil, is a miserable and jealous boy who conspires against Tom. Tom grows into a vigorous and lusty yet honest and kind-hearted youth. He tends to be closer friends with the servants and gamekeepers than with members of the gentry. He is close friends with Black George, who is the gamekeeper. His first love is Molly, Black George's second daughter and a local beauty. She throws herself at Tom, who gets her pregnant and then feels obliged to offer her his protection. After some time, however, Tom finds out that Molly is somewhat promiscuous. He then falls in love with a neighbouring squire's lovely daughter, Sophia Western. Tom and Sophia confess their love for each other after Tom breaks his arm rescuing Sophia. Tom's status as a bastard causes Sophia's father and Allworthy to disapprove their love. This class friction gives Fielding an opportunity for biting social commentary. The inclusion of prostitution and sexual promiscuity in the plot was also novel for its time, and it was the foundation for criticism of the book's "lowness".[6] Squire Allworthy falls ill and is convinced that he is dying. His family and servants gather around his bed as he disposes his wealth. He gives a favourable amount of his wealth to Tom Jones, which displeases Master Blifil. Tom doesn't care about what he has been given, since his only concern is Allworthy's health. Allworthy's health improves, and we learn that he will live. Tom Jones is so excited that he begins to get drunk and gets into a fight with Master Blifil. Sophia wants to conceal her love for Tom, so she gives a majority of her attention to Blifil when the three of them are together. This leads to Sophia's aunt, Mrs Western, believing that Sophia and Blifil are in love. Squire Western wants Sophia to marry Blifil in order to gain property from the Allworthy estate. Blifil learns of Sophia's true affection for Tom Jones and is angry. Blifil tells Allworthy that, on the day he almost died, Tom was out drinking and singing and celebrating his coming death. This leads Tom to be banished. Tom’s banishment seems to ensure that Sophia will be forced to marry Blifil, whom she finds odious, so she flees to avoid that fate. After Tom is expelled from Allworthy's estate he begins his adventures across Britain, eventually ending up in London. On the way, he meets a barber, Partridge, who was banished from town because he was thought to be Tom's father. He becomes Tom's faithful companion in the hope of restoring his reputation. During their journey, they end up at an inn. While they are there, a lady and her maid arrive. An angry man arrives, and the chambermaid points him in the direction she thinks he needs to go. He bursts in on Tom and Mrs Waters, a woman whom Tom rescued, in bed together. The man, however, was looking for Mrs Fitzpatrick and leaves. Sophia and her maid arrive at the same inn, and Partridge unknowingly reveals the relationship between Tom and Mrs Waters. Sophia leaves with Mrs Fitzpatrick, who is her cousin, and heads for London. They arrive at the home of Lady Bellaston, followed by Tom and Partridge. Eventually, Tom tells Sophia that his true love is for her and no one else. Tom ends up getting into a duel with Mr Fitzpatrick, which leads to his imprisonment. Eventually, the secret of Tom's birth is revealed after a brief scare involving Mrs Waters. Mrs Waters is really Jenny Jones, Tom's supposed mother, and Tom fears that he has committed incest. This, however, is not the case, as Tom's mother is in fact Bridget Allworthy, who conceived him after an affair with a schoolmaster. Tom is thus Squire Allworthy's nephew. After finding out about the intrigues of Blifil, who is Tom's half-brother, Allworthy decides to bestow most of his inheritance on Tom. After Tom's true parentage is revealed, he and Sophia marry, as Squire Western no longer harbours any misgivings about Tom marrying his daughter. Sophia bears Tom a son and a daughter, and the couple live on happily with the blessings of Squire Western and Squire Allworthy. Style[edit] The highly visible narrator is a central feature of Tom Jones. Each book begins with a prefatory chapter directly addressing the reader, and the narrator provides a continuous commentary on characters and events. According to Wayne C. Booth, the reader's relationship with the narrator is something like a subplot. The reader becomes more attached to the narrator over the course of the book, culminating in a heartfelt farewell.[7] The fight at the inn at Upton Fielding presents a panorama of contemporary British life, drawing characters from many different classes and occupations. But Ian Watt argues in The Rise of the Novel that Fielding did not aim at the "realism of presentation" of lifelike detail and psychology practiced by authors such as Richardson. Watt claims that Fielding was more focused on the "realism of assessment", the way in which the novel engages a broad range of topics with intelligence and "a wise assessment of life".[8] Themes[edit] The main theme of the novel is the contrast between Tom Jones's good nature, flawed but eventually corrected by his love for virtuous Sophia Western, and his half-brother Blifil's hypocrisy. Secondary themes include several other examples of virtue (especially that of Squire Allworthy), hypocrisy (especially that of Thwackum) and villainy (for example, that of Mrs Western and Ensign Northerton), sometimes tempered by repentance (for instance Square and Mrs Waters née Jones). Both introductory chapters to each book and interspersed commentary introduce a long line of further themes. For instance, introductory chapters dwell extensively on bad writers and critics, quite unrelated to the plot but apologetic to the author and the novel itself; and authorial commentary on several characters shows strong opposition to Methodism, calling it fanatical and heretical, and implying an association between Methodism and hypocrites such as the younger Blifil. The novel takes place against the backdrop of the Jacobite rising of 1745. Characters take different sides over the rebellion, which was an attempt to restore Roman Catholicism as the established religion of England and to undo the Glorious Revolution. At one point Sophia Western is even mistaken for Jenny Cameron, the supposed lover of Bonnie Prince Charlie. Good-natured characters are often moderately loyalist and Anglican, or even supporters of the House of Hanover, while ill-natured characters (Mrs Western) or mistaken ones (Partridge) can be Jacobites, or (like Squire Western) anti-Hanoverian. List of characters[edit] Caption at bottom: SOPHIA WESTERN: "Adorned with all the charms in which Nature can array her, bedecked with beauty, youth, sprightliness, innocence, modesty and tenderness, breathing sweetness from her rosy lips and darting brightness from her sparkling eyes, the lovely Sophia comes!" This depicts the heroine of the novel, but shows her in the latest fashions of 1800, rather than in the historically accurate hoop skirts of 1749 – it would have been extremely difficult to skip in the clothing styles (and high-heeled shoes) of 1749... The dishevelment of her clothes in the picture was not meant to contradict the word "modesty" in the caption, but was supposed to be understood as being the accidental and unintentional effect of her strenuous physical activity. Master Thomas "Tom" Jones, a bastard and Squire Allworthy's ward Miss Sophia "Sophy" Western /ˌsoʊˈfaɪə/, Western's only daughter, the model of virtue, beauty and all good qualities Master William Blifil /ˈblɪfəl/, the son of Captain Blifil and Bridget; a hypocrite and Tom Jones's rival Squire Allworthy, the wealthy squire of an estate in Somerset and Tom's guardian; of irreproachable character and good nature Squire Western, a wealthy squire and huntsman who owns an estate bordering on Squire Allworthy's; a simpleton who wants to marry his daughter Sophia to Allworthy's heir (first Blifil and then Jones) Miss Bridget Allworthy (later Mrs Blifil), Allworthy's sister Lady Bellaston, Tom's lover and a leading figure in London society, who tries to force Sophia into marriage to a lord by having her raped by him, so that she can have Jones to herself Mrs Honour Blackmore, Sophia's maid; egotistical and inconstant to her employer Dr Blifil, Captain Blifil's brother; dies of a broken heart at his brother's rejection Captain John Blifil, a captain in the army and Bridget Allworthy's husband; with Methodist tendencies Lawyer Dowling, a lawyer Lord Fellamar, a peer and socialite; unsuccessfully conspires with Lady Belladonna to rape Sophia so as to force her into marriage Brian Fitzpatrick, an Irishman who abuses his wife, Harriet Fitzpatrick Harriet Fitzpatrick, Mrs Western's former ward and Fitzpatrick's wife; a cousin and friend of Sophia, but lacking her virtue Miss Jenny Jones (later Mrs Waters), the Partridges' servant, a very intelligent woman who is believed to be Tom's mother Mrs Miller, mother of Nancy and Betty Miller Miss Betty Miller, pre-adolescent daughter of Mrs Miller Miss Nancy Miller (later Nightingale), a good-natured girl who is imposed on by Mr Nightingale and is ruined by him, together with her family, by lack of constancy in virtue Mr Nightingale, a young gentleman of leisure; saved from ruining his first true love by Jones's entreaties Mr Benjamin "Little Benjamin" Partridge, a teacher, barber, and surgeon, suspected to be Tom Jones's father Mrs Partridge, Partridge's extremely ill-natured first wife Mr George "Black George" Seagrim, Allworthy and later Western's gamekeeper; a poor man and the object of Tom's charity Miss Molly "Moll" Seagrim, Black George's second daughter and Tom Jones's first lover; has a bastard son, possibly by Tom Mr Thomas Square, a humanist philosopher and tutor to Tom and Master Blifil; a hypocrite who hates Jones and favors Blifil, but eventually repents The Rev. Mr Roger Thwackum, tutor to Tom and Master Blifil, a hypocrite who hates Tom Jones, favors Master Blifil and conspires with the latter against the former Miss Western, Squire Western's unmarried sister, who wrongly believes herself to "know the World" (both international and national politics and social mores) Mrs Deborah Wilkins, Bridget's servant Adaptations and influences[edit] The book was made into the 1963 film Tom Jones written by John Osborne, directed by Tony Richardson, and starring Albert Finney as Tom. It inspired the 1976 film The Bawdy Adventures of Tom Jones. It has also been the basis of operas by François-André Philidor (Tom Jones, 1765); by Edward German (Tom Jones, 1907); and by Stephen Oliver in 1975. A BBC adaptation dramatised by Simon Burke was broadcast in 1997 with Max Beesley in the title role. The book has also been adapted for the stage by Joan Macalpine.[9] In 2014, Jon Jory adapted the novel for the stage.[10] The book will also be adapted into a jukebox musical called What's New Pussycat? featuring songs by the singer Tom Jones setting the story in the 1960s.[11] See also[edit] Novels portal Illegitimacy in fiction Bibliography[edit] Editions[edit] Fielding, Henry Tom Jones (London: Andrew Millar, 1749). The first edition. Fielding, Henry "Tom Jones" (New York: The Modern Library, 1931). First Modern Library Edition. Fielding, Henry Tom Jones (Wesleyan University Press, 1975) ISBN 978-0-8195-6048-3. Edited by Martin Battestin and Fredson C. Bowers. Widely taken to be the authoritative version. Fielding, Henry Tom Jones (New York: W. W. Norton, 1995) ISBN 0393965945. Edited with notes by Sheridan Baker. This edition includes a collection of critical essays; it is based on the fourth and final edition of the novel, though it also includes the version of The Man of the Hill episode found in the 3rd edition in an appendix. Fielding, Henry Tom Jones (London: Everyman's Library, 1998) ISBN 978-0-460-87833-3. Edited with an introduction and notes by Douglas Brooks-Davies. Fielding, Henry Tom Jones (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 2005) ISBN 978-0-14-043622-8. Edited with an introduction and notes by Tom Keymer and Alice Wakely. Fielding, Henry Tom Jones (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1985). Edited with an introduction and notes by Reginald P. C. Mutter. Critical collections[edit] Compton, Neil (ed.) Henry Fielding: Tom Jones, A Casebook (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1987) ISBN 0333077393. Includes essays by William Empson, Ian Watt, and Claude Rawson, amongst others. Monographs Battestin, Martin C. The Providence of Wit (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1970) ISBN 0198120524. Includes a chapter on Tom Jones. Ewers, Chris. Mobility in the English Novel from Defoe to Austen (Woodbridge: Boydell and Brewer, 2018) ISBN 978-1787442726. Includes a chapter on Tom Jones. Power, Henry. Epic into Novel (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015) ISBN 978-0198723875. Includes two chapters on Tom Jones. Rogers, Pat The Augustan Vision (London: Methuen, 1978) ISBN 0416709702. Includes a chapter on Fielding, which treats Tom Jones briefly. Watt, Ian The Rise of the Novel (London: Pimlico, 2000) ISBN 0712664270. Includes a chapter on Tom Jones, preceded by one titled 'Fielding and the epic theory of the novel'. References[edit] ^ Yardley, Jonathan (9 December 2003). "Tom Jones, as Fresh as Ever". The Washington Post. p. C1. Retrieved 31 December 2006. ^ http://home.comcast.net/~dwtaylor1/maughamstenbestnovels.html[permanent dead link] ^ Samuel Taylor Coleridge and Henry Nelson Coleridge, Specimens of the table talk of Samuel Taylor Coleridge (London, England: John Murray, 1835), volume 2, page 339. ^ Patton, Allyson (12 June 2006). "The History of Tom Jones, a Foundling (Book Review)". Historynet.com. HistoryNet LLC. Retrieved 16 September 2016. ^ Drabble, Margaret, ed. (1998) The Oxford Companion to English Literature; (2nd) revised ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; pp. 982–983 ^ Fielding, H (1950), "Introduction by G. Sherburn", The History of Tom Jones, a Foundling, New York: Modern Library, p. viii . ^ Booth, Wayne C (1961). The Rhetoric of Fiction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp. 94-96. ISBN 9780226065786. ^ Watt, Ian (2015) [1957]. The Rise of the Novel. London: The Bodley Head. p. 288. ISBN 9781847923851. ^ "Tom Jones (Macalpine)". Archived from the original on 19 August 2014. ^ Jones, Chris (27 January 2014). "Jory's stage version of novel has wit but lacks clarity". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved 2 October 2018. ^ "Tom Jones musical What's New Pussycat? to premiere this autumn". the Guardian. 6 March 2020. Retrieved 6 September 2020. Sources[edit] Tom Jones, Wordsworth Classics, Introduction and Notes Doreen Roberts, Canterbury: Rutherford College, University of Kent, 1999 [1992], ISBN 1-85326-021-5CS1 maint: others (link) . Words, Words, Words: From the Beginnings to the Eighteenth Century, La Spiga languages, 2003 . Battestin, Martin. The Providence of Wit: Aspects of Form in Augustan Literature and the Arts. Oxford: Clarendon, 1974. Hunter, J. Paul. Before Novels: The Cultural Context of Eighteenth-Century English Fiction. New York: WW Norton and Co., 1990. McKeon, Michael. The Origins of the English Novel, 1600–1740. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987. Paulson, Ronald. Satire and the Novel in the Eighteenth Century. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1967. Richetti, John. "Representing an Under Class: Servants and Proletarians in Fielding and Smollett." The New Eighteenth Century: Theory, Politics, English Literature. Eds. Felicity Nussbaum and Laura Brown. London: Routledge, 1987. Richetti, John. "The Old Order and the New Novel of the Mid-Eighteenth Century: Narrative Authority in Fielding and Smollett." Eighteenth-Century Fiction 2 (1990): 99–126. Smallwood, Angela J. Fielding and the Woman Question. New York: St. Martin's, 1989. Spacks, Patricia Meyer. Desire and Truth: Functions of Plot in Eighteenth-Century English Novels. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990. Watt, Ian. The Rise of the Novel: Studies in Defoe, Richardson and Fielding. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1957. External links[edit] Wikisource has original text related to this article: The History of Tom Jones, a Foundling Wikimedia Commons has media related to The History of Tom Jones, a Foundling. The History of Tom Jones, a Foundling at Internet Archive and Google Books (scanned books original editions color illustrated) The History of Tom Jones, a Foundling from Project Gutenberg (plain text and HTML) The History of Tom Jones, a Foundling public domain audiobook at LibriVox Tom Jones Map The History of Tom Jones, a Foundling at Open Library v t e Henry Fielding Early plays Love in Several Masques The Temple Beau The Author's Farce Tom Thumb Rape upon Rape The Tragedy of Tragedies The Letter Writers The Welsh Opera The Grub Street Opera The Lottery The Modern Husband The Old Debauchees The Covent Garden Tragedy The Mock Doctor The Miser The Universal Gallant Later plays The Historical Register for the Year 1736 Novels and Narratives Shamela Joseph Andrews Jonathan Wild Tom Jones Amelia Essays and Misc. The Covent-Garden Journal The Golden Rump (play, attributed) Events Actor Rebellion of 1733 Licensing Act 1737 Paper War of 1752–1753 People John Fielding Sarah Fielding Christopher Smart Samuel Richardson Scriblerus Club Authority control BNF: cb122892543 (data) MBW work: 9cf1f767-568b-49e8-9c6a-00d9c977cebc Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_History_of_Tom_Jones,_a_Foundling&oldid=996199629" Categories: 1749 novels British novels adapted into films British novels adapted into plays Novels adapted into operas Novels by Henry Fielding 18th-century British novels Picaresque novels English novels Novels set in Somerset Hidden categories: All articles with dead external links Articles with dead external links from December 2017 Articles with permanently dead external links Articles with short description Short description matches Wikidata EngvarB from September 2013 CS1 maint: others Commons category link is on Wikidata Articles with LibriVox links Articles with Open Library links Use dmy dates from September 2013 Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with MusicBrainz work identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikisource Languages العربية Čeština Dansk Deutsch Español فارسی Français 한국어 Հայերեն Italiano עברית Magyar 日本語 Norsk bokmål ਪੰਜਾਬੀ Polski Português Română Русский Slovenščina Suomi Svenska Українська Vèneto 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 25 December 2020, at 02:48 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2439 ---- John Keats - Wikipedia John Keats From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search "Keats" redirects here. For other uses, see Keats (disambiguation). English Romantic poet (1795-1821) John Keats Posthumous portrait of John Keats by William Hilton. National Portrait Gallery, London Born (1795-10-31)31 October 1795 Moorgate, London, England Died 23 February 1821(1821-02-23) (aged 25) Rome, Papal States Cause of death Tuberculosis Occupation Poet Literary movement Romanticism Relatives George Keats (brother) John Keats (/kiːts/; 31 October 1795 – 23 February 1821) was an English Romantic poet. He was one of the main figures of the second generation of Romantic poets, along with Lord Byron and Percy Bysshe Shelley, despite his works having been in publication for only four years before his death from tuberculosis at the age of 25.[1] Although his poems were not generally well received by critics during his lifetime, his reputation grew after his death, and by the end of the 19th century, he had become one of the most beloved of all English poets. He had a significant influence on a diverse range of poets and writers. Jorge Luis Borges stated that his first encounter with Keats' work was a great experience that he felt all of his life.[2] The poetry of Keats is characterised by a style "heavily loaded with sensualities", most notably in the series of odes. This is typical of the Romantic poets, as they aimed to accentuate extreme emotion through an emphasis on natural imagery. Today his poems and letters are some of the most popular and most analysed in English literature. Some of his most acclaimed works are "Ode to a Nightingale", "Sleep and Poetry", and the sonnet "On First Looking into Chapman's Homer". Contents 1 Biography 1.1 Early life 1.2 Early career 1.3 Wentworth Place 1.4 Isabella Jones and Fanny Brawne 1.5 Last months: Rome 1.6 Death 2 Reception 2.1 Biographers 2.2 Other portrayals 3 Letters 4 Major Works 5 Notes 6 References 7 Sources 8 Further reading 9 External links Biography[edit] Early life[edit] John Keats was born in Moorgate, London, on 31 October 1795 to Thomas Keats and his wife, Frances Jennings. There is little evidence of his exact birthplace. Although Keats and his family seem to have marked his birthday on 29 October, baptism records give the date as the 31st.[3][4] He was the eldest of four surviving children; his younger siblings were George (1797–1841), Thomas (1799–1818), and Frances Mary "Fanny" (1803–1889) who eventually married Spanish author Valentín Llanos Gutiérrez.[5] Another son was lost in infancy. His father first worked as a hostler[6] at the stables attached to the Swan and Hoop Inn, an establishment he later managed, and where the growing family lived for some years. Keats believed that he was born at the inn, a birthplace of humble origins, but there is no evidence to support his belief.[4] The Globe pub now occupies the site (2012), a few yards from the modern-day Moorgate station.[7] He was baptised at St Botolph-without-Bishopsgate, and sent to a local dame school as a child.[3][8] Life mask of Keats by Benjamin Haydon, 1816 His parents were unable to afford Eton or Harrow,[9][10] so in the summer of 1803, he was sent to board at John Clarke's school in Enfield, close to his grandparents' house. The small school had a liberal outlook and a progressive curriculum more modern than the larger, more prestigious schools.[11] In the family atmosphere at Clarke's, Keats developed an interest in classics and history, which would stay with him throughout his short life. The headmaster's son, Charles Cowden Clarke, also became an important mentor and friend, introducing Keats to Renaissance literature, including Tasso, Spenser, and Chapman's translations. The young Keats was described by his friend Edward Holmes as a volatile character, "always in extremes", given to indolence and fighting. However, at 13 he began focusing his energy on reading and study, winning his first academic prize in midsummer 1809.[11] In April 1804, when Keats was eight, his father died from a skull fracture, suffered when he fell from his horse while returning from a visit to Keats and his brother George at school.[12] Thomas Keats died intestate. Frances remarried two months later, but left her new husband soon afterwards, and the four children went to live with their grandmother, Alice Jennings, in the village of Edmonton.[13] In March 1810, when Keats was 14, his mother died of tuberculosis, leaving the children in the custody of their grandmother. She appointed two guardians, Richard Abbey and John Sandell, to take care of them. That autumn, Keats left Clarke's school to apprentice with Thomas Hammond, a surgeon and apothecary who was a neighbour and the doctor of the Jennings family. Keats lodged in the attic above the surgery at 7 Church Street until 1813.[4] Cowden Clarke, who remained a close friend of Keats, described this period as "the most placid time in Keats' life."[14] Early career[edit] From 1814 Keats had two bequests, held in trust for him until his 21st birthday: £800, willed by his grandfather John Jennings (equivalent to about £56371 in 2020) and a quarter of his mother's legacy of £8000 (equivalent to about £563705 in 2019), to be equally divided between her living children.[nb 1] It seems he was not told of the £800, and probably knew nothing of it, since he never applied for it. Historically, blame has often been laid on Abbey as legal guardian, but he may also have been unaware.[15] William Walton, solicitor for Keats' mother and grandmother, definitely did know and had a duty of care to relay the information to Keats. It seems he did not. The money would have made a critical difference to the poet's expectations. Money was always a great concern and difficulty for him, as he struggled to stay out of debt and make his way in the world independently.[4][16] On First Looking into Chapman's Homer Much have I travell'd in the realms of gold, And many goodly states and kingdoms seen; Round many western islands have I been Which bards in fealty to Apollo hold. Oft of one wide expanse had I been told That deep-browed Homer ruled as his demesne; Yet did I never breathe its pure serene Till I heard Chapman speak out loud and bold: Then felt I like some watcher of the skies When a new planet swims into his ken; Or like stout Cortez when with eagle eyes He star'd at the Pacific — and all his men Look'd at each other with a wild surmise — Silent, upon a peak in Darien. The sonnet "On First Looking into Chapman's Homer" October 1816 Having finished his apprenticeship with Hammond, Keats registered as a medical student at Guy's Hospital (now part of King's College London) and began studying there in October 1815. Within a month of starting, he was accepted as a dresser at the hospital, assisting surgeons during operations, the equivalent of a junior house surgeon today. It was a significant promotion, that marked a distinct aptitude for medicine; it brought greater responsibility and a heavier workload.[4] Keats' long and expensive medical training with Hammond and at Guy's Hospital led his family to assume he would pursue a lifelong career in medicine, assuring financial security, and it seems that at this point Keats had a genuine desire to become a doctor.[4][11] He lodged near the hospital, at 28 St Thomas's Street in Southwark, with other medical students, including Henry Stephens who became an inventor and ink magnate.[17] However, Keats' training took up increasing amounts of his writing time, and he was increasingly ambivalent about his medical career. He felt that he faced a stark choice.[11][18] He had written his first extant poem, "An Imitation of Spenser," in 1814, when he was 19. Now, strongly drawn by ambition, inspired by fellow poets such as Leigh Hunt and Lord Byron, and beleaguered by family financial crises, he suffered periods of depression. His brother George wrote that John "feared that he should never be a poet, & if he was not he would destroy himself".[19] In 1816, Keats received his apothecary's licence, which made him eligible to practise as an apothecary, physician, and surgeon, but before the end of the year he announced to his guardian that he was resolved to be a poet, not a surgeon.[4] Although he continued his work and training at Guy's, Keats devoted more and more time to the study of literature, experimenting with verse forms, particularly the sonnet.[4] In May 1816, Leigh Hunt agreed to publish the sonnet "O Solitude" in his magazine, The Examiner, a leading liberal magazine of the day.[20] It was the first appearance in print of Keats' poetry, and Charles Cowden Clarke described it as his friend's red letter day,[21] the first proof that Keats' ambitions were valid. Among his poems of 1816 was To My Brothers.[22] In the summer of that year, Keats went with Clarke to the seaside town of Margate to write. There he began "Calidore" and initiated the era of his great letter writing. On his return to London, he took lodgings at 8 Dean Street, Southwark, and braced himself for further study in order to become a member of the Royal College of Surgeons.[23] In October 1816, Clarke introduced Keats to the influential Leigh Hunt, a close friend of Byron and Shelley. Five months later came the publication of Poems, the first volume of Keats' verse, which included "I stood tiptoe" and "Sleep and Poetry," both strongly influenced by Hunt.[20] The book was a critical failure, arousing little interest, although Reynolds reviewed it favourably in The Champion.[11] Clarke commented that the book "might have emerged in Timbuctoo."[4] Keats' publishers, Charles and James Ollier, felt ashamed of the book. Keats immediately changed publishers to Taylor and Hessey on Fleet Street.[24] Unlike the Olliers, Keats' new publishers were enthusiastic about his work. Within a month of the publication of Poems they were planning a new Keats volume and had paid him an advance. Hessey became a steady friend to Keats and made the company's rooms available for young writers to meet. Their publishing lists eventually included Coleridge, Hazlitt, Clare, Hogg, Carlyle and Lamb.[25] Through Taylor and Hessey, Keats met their Eton-educated lawyer, Richard Woodhouse, who advised them on literary as well as legal matters and was deeply impressed by Poems. Although he noted that Keats could be "wayward, trembling, easily daunted," Woodhouse was convinced of Keats' genius, a poet to support as he became one of England's greatest writers. Soon after they met, the two became close friends, and Woodhouse started to collect Keatsiana, documenting as much as he could about Keats' poetry. This archive survives as one of the main sources of information on Keats' work.[4] Andrew Motion represents him as Boswell to Keats' Johnson, ceaselessly promoting the writer's work, fighting his corner, and spurring his poetry to greater heights. In later years, Woodhouse was one of the few people to accompany Keats to Gravesend to embark on his final trip to Rome.[26] In spite of the bad reviews of Poems, Hunt published the essay "Three Young Poets" (Shelley, Keats, and Reynolds) and the sonnet "On First Looking into Chapman's Homer," foreseeing great things to come.[27] He introduced Keats to many prominent men in his circle, including the editor of The Times, Thomas Barnes; the writer Charles Lamb; the conductor Vincent Novello; and the poet John Hamilton Reynolds, who would become a close friend.[28] He was also regularly meeting William Hazlitt, a powerful literary figure of the day. It was a decisive turning point for Keats, establishing him in the public eye as a figure in what Hunt termed "a new school of poetry."[29] At this time Keats wrote to his friend Bailey: "I am certain of nothing but the holiness of the Heart's affections and the truth of the imagination. What imagination seizes as Beauty must be truth."[1][30] This passage would eventually be transmuted into the concluding lines of "Ode on a Grecian Urn": "'Beauty is truth, truth beauty' – that is all / Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know". In early December 1816, under the heady influence of his artistic friends, Keats told Abbey that he had decided to give up medicine in favour of poetry, to Abbey's fury. Keats had spent a great deal on his medical training and, despite his state of financial hardship and indebtedness, had made large loans to friends such as painter Benjamin Haydon. Keats would go on to lend £700 to his brother George. By lending so much, Keats could no longer cover the interest of his own debts.[4][31] Having left his training at the hospital, suffering from a succession of colds, and unhappy with living in damp rooms in London, Keats moved with his brothers into rooms at 1 Well Walk in the village of Hampstead in April 1817. Both John and George nursed their brother Tom, who was suffering from tuberculosis. The house was close to Hunt and others from his circle in Hampstead, as well as to Coleridge, respected elder of the first wave of Romantic poets, at that time living in Highgate. On 11 April 1818, Keats reported that he and Coleridge had a long walk together on Hampstead Heath. In a letter to his brother George, Keats wrote that they talked about "a thousand things,... nightingales, poetry, poetical sensation, metaphysics."[32] Around this time he was introduced to Charles Wentworth Dilke and James Rice.[33] In June 1818, Keats began a walking tour of Scotland, Ireland, and the Lake District with his friend Charles Armitage Brown. Keats' brother George and his wife Georgina accompanied them as far as Lancaster and then continued to Liverpool, from where the couple emigrated to America. They lived in Ohio and Louisville, Kentucky, until 1841, when George's investments failed. Like Keats' other brother, they both died penniless and racked by tuberculosis, for which there was no effective treatment until the next century.[34][35] In July, while on the Isle of Mull, Keats caught a bad cold and "was too thin and fevered to proceed on the journey."[36] After his return south in August, Keats continued to nurse Tom, exposing himself to infection. Some biographers suggest that this is when tuberculosis, his "family disease," first took hold.[37][38] "Consumption" was not identified as a disease with a single infectious origin until 1820, and there was considerable stigma attached to the condition, as it was often associated with weakness, repressed sexual passion, or masturbation. Keats "refuses to give it a name" in his letters.[39] Tom Keats died on 1 December 1818. Wentworth Place[edit] Wentworth Place, now the Keats House museum (left), Ten Keats Grove (right) John Keats moved to the newly built Wentworth Place, owned by his friend Charles Armitage Brown. It was on the edge of Hampstead Heath, ten minutes' walk south of his old home in Well Walk. The winter of 1818–19, though a difficult period for the poet, marked the beginning of his annus mirabilis in which he wrote his most mature work.[1] He had been inspired by a series of recent lectures by Hazlitt on English poets and poetic identity and had also met Wordsworth.[40][41] Keats may have seemed to his friends to be living on comfortable means, but in reality he was borrowing regularly from Abbey and his friends.[4] He composed five of his six great odes at Wentworth Place in April and May and, although it is debated in which order they were written, "Ode to Psyche" opened the published series. According to Brown, "Ode to a Nightingale" was composed under a plum tree in the garden.[nb 2][42][43] Brown wrote, "In the spring of 1819 a nightingale had built her nest near my house. Keats felt a tranquil and continual joy in her song; and one morning he took his chair from the breakfast-table to the grass-plot under a plum-tree, where he sat for two or three hours. When he came into the house, I perceived he had some scraps of paper in his hand, and these he was quietly thrusting behind the books. On inquiry, I found those scraps, four or five in number, contained his poetic feelings on the song of our nightingale."[44] Dilke, co-owner of the house, strenuously denied the story, printed in Richard Monckton Milnes' 1848 biography of Keats, dismissing it as 'pure delusion'.[45] My heart aches, and a drowsy numbness pains  My sense, as though of hemlock I had drunk, Or emptied some dull opiate to the drains  One minute past, and Lethe-wards had sunk: 'Tis not through envy of thy happy lot,  But being too happy in thine happiness,—  That thou, light-winged Dryad of the trees,  In some melodious plot  Of beechen green, and shadows numberless,  Singest of summer in full-throated ease. First stanza of "Ode to a Nightingale", May 1819 "Ode on a Grecian Urn" and "Ode on Melancholy" were inspired by sonnet forms and probably written after "Ode to a Nightingale".[4] Keats' new and progressive publishers Taylor and Hessey issued Endymion, which Keats dedicated to Thomas Chatterton, a work that he termed "a trial of my Powers of Imagination".[4] It was damned by the critics, giving rise to Byron's quip that Keats was ultimately "snuffed out by an article", suggesting that he never truly got over it. A particularly harsh review by John Wilson Croker appeared in the April 1818 edition of The Quarterly Review.[nb 3] John Gibson Lockhart writing in Blackwood's Magazine, described Endymion as "imperturbable drivelling idiocy". With biting sarcasm, Lockhart advised, "It is a better and a wiser thing to be a starved apothecary than a starved poet; so back to the shop Mr John, back to plasters, pills, and ointment boxes".[nb 4] It was Lockhart at Blackwoods who coined the defamatory term "the Cockney School" for Hunt and his circle, which included both Hazlitt and Keats. The dismissal was as much political as literary, aimed at upstart young writers deemed uncouth for their lack of education, non-formal rhyming and "low diction". They had not attended Eton, Harrow or Oxbridge and they were not from the upper classes.[46] In 1819, Keats wrote "The Eve of St. Agnes", "La Belle Dame sans Merci", "Hyperion", "Lamia" and a play, Otho the Great (critically damned and not performed until 1950).[47] The poems "Fancy" and "Bards of passion and of mirth" were inspired by the garden of Wentworth Place. In September, very short of money and in despair considering taking up journalism or a post as a ship's surgeon, he approached his publishers with a new book of poems.[4] They were unimpressed with the collection, finding the presented versions of "Lamia" confusing, and describing "St Agnes" as having a "sense of pettish disgust" and "a 'Don Juan' style of mingling up sentiment and sneering" concluding it was "a poem unfit for ladies".[48] The final volume Keats lived to see, Lamia, Isabella, The Eve of St. Agnes, and Other Poems, was eventually published in July 1820. It received greater acclaim than had Endymion or Poems, finding favourable notices in both The Examiner and Edinburgh Review. It would come to be recognised as one of the most important poetic works ever published.[4] Wentworth Place now houses the Keats House museum.[49] Isabella Jones and Fanny Brawne[edit] See also: Fanny Brawne Keats befriended Isabella Jones in May 1817, while on holiday in the village of Bo Peep, near Hastings. She is described as beautiful, talented and widely read, not of the top flight of society yet financially secure, an enigmatic figure who would become a part of Keats' circle.[50][51] Throughout their friendship Keats never hesitates to own his sexual attraction to her, although they seem to enjoy circling each other rather than offering commitment. He writes that he "frequented her rooms" in the winter of 1818–19, and in his letters to George says that he "warmed with her" and "kissed her".[51] The trysts may have been a sexual initiation for Keats according to Bate and Gittings.[51] Jones inspired and was a steward of Keats' writing. The themes of "The Eve of St. Agnes" and "The Eve of St Mark" may well have been suggested by her, the lyric Hush, Hush! ["o sweet Isabel"] was about her, and that the first version of "Bright Star" may have originally been for her.[52][53] In 1821, Jones was one of the first in England to be notified of Keats' death.[50] Letters and drafts of poems suggest that Keats first met Frances (Fanny) Brawne between September and November 1818.[54] It is likely that the 18-year-old Brawne visited the Dilke family at Wentworth Place before she lived there. She was born in the hamlet of West End (now in the district of West Hampstead), on 9 August 1800. Like Keats' grandfather, her grandfather kept a London inn, and both lost several family members to tuberculosis. She shared her first name with both Keats' sister and mother, and had a talent for dress-making and languages as well as a natural theatrical bent.[55] During November 1818 she developed an intimacy with Keats, but it was shadowed by the illness of Tom Keats, whom John was nursing through this period.[56] Ambrotype of Fanny Brawne taken circa 1850 (photograph on glass) On 3 April 1819, Brawne and her widowed mother moved into the other half of Dilke's Wentworth Place, and Keats and Brawne were able to see each other every day. Keats began to lend Brawne books, such as Dante's Inferno, and they would read together. He gave her the love sonnet "Bright Star" (perhaps revised for her) as a declaration. It was a work in progress which he continued at until the last months of his life, and the poem came to be associated with their relationship. "All his desires were concentrated on Fanny".[57] From this point there is no further documented mention of Isabella Jones.[57] Sometime before the end of June, he arrived at some sort of understanding with Brawne, far from a formal engagement as he still had too little to offer, with no prospects and financial stricture.[58] Keats endured great conflict knowing his expectations as a struggling poet in increasingly hard straits would preclude marriage to Brawne. Their love remained unconsummated; jealousy for his 'star' began to gnaw at him. Darkness, disease and depression surrounded him, reflected in poems such as "The Eve of St. Agnes" and "La Belle Dame sans Merci" where love and death both stalk. "I have two luxuries to brood over in my walks;" he wrote to her, "...your loveliness, and the hour of my death".[58] In one of his many hundreds of notes and letters, Keats wrote to Brawne on 13 October 1819: "My love has made me selfish. I cannot exist without you – I am forgetful of every thing but seeing you again – my Life seems to stop there – I see no further. You have absorb'd me. I have a sensation at the present moment as though I was dissolving – I should be exquisitely miserable without the hope of soon seeing you ... I have been astonished that Men could die Martyrs for religion – I have shudder'd at it – I shudder no more – I could be martyr'd for my Religion – Love is my religion – I could die for that – I could die for you." Tuberculosis took hold and he was advised by his doctors to move to a warmer climate. In September 1820 Keats left for Rome knowing he would probably never see Brawne again. After leaving he felt unable to write to her or read her letters, although he did correspond with her mother.[4] He died there five months later. None of Brawne's letters to Keats survive.[59] It took a month for the news of his death to reach London, after which Brawne stayed in mourning for six years. In 1833, more than 12 years after his death, she married and went on to have three children; she outlived Keats by more than 40 years.[49][60] Last months: Rome[edit] During 1820 Keats displayed increasingly serious symptoms of tuberculosis, suffering two lung haemorrhages in the first few days of February.[61][62] On first coughing up blood, on 3 February 1820, he said to Charles Armitage Brown, "I know the colour of that blood! It is arterial blood. I cannot be deceived in that colour. That drop of blood is my death warrant. I must die."[63][64] He lost large amounts of blood and was bled further by the attending physician. Hunt nursed him in London for much of the following summer. At the suggestion of his doctors, he agreed to move to Italy with his friend Joseph Severn. On 13 September, they left for Gravesend and four days later boarded the sailing brig Maria Crowther. On 1 October the ship landed at Lulworth Bay or Holworth Bay where the two went ashore; back onboard ship he made the final revisions of "Bright Star".[65][66] The journey was a minor catastrophe: storms broke out followed by a dead calm that slowed the ship's progress. When they finally docked in Naples, the ship was held in quarantine for ten days due to a suspected outbreak of cholera in Britain. Keats reached Rome on 14 November, by which time any hope of the warmer climate he sought had disappeared.[67] Keats' house in Rome Keats wrote his last letter on 30 November 1820 to Charles Armitage Brown; "Tis the most difficult thing in the world to me to write a letter. My stomach continues so bad, that I feel it worse on opening any book – yet I am much better than I was in Quarantine. Then I am afraid to encounter the proing and conning of any thing interesting to me in England. I have an habitual feeling of my real life having past, and that I am leading a posthumous existence".[68] On arrival in Italy, he moved into a villa on the Spanish Steps in Rome, today the Keats–Shelley Memorial House museum. Despite care from Severn and Dr. James Clark, his health rapidly deteriorated. The medical attention Keats received may have hastened his death.[69] In November 1820, Clark declared that the source of his illness was "mental exertion" and that the source was largely situated in his stomach. Clark eventually diagnosed consumption (tuberculosis) and placed Keats on a starvation diet of an anchovy and a piece of bread a day intended to reduce the blood flow to his stomach. He also bled the poet: a standard treatment of the day, but also likely a significant contributor to Keats' weakness.[70] Severn's biographer Sue Brown writes: "They could have used opium in small doses, and Keats had asked Severn to buy a bottle of opium when they were setting off on their voyage. What Severn didn't realise was that Keats saw it as a possible resource if he wanted to commit suicide. He tried to get the bottle from Severn on the voyage but Severn wouldn't let him have it. Then in Rome he tried again... Severn was in such a quandary he didn't know what to do, so in the end he went to the doctor who took it away. As a result Keats went through dreadful agonies with nothing to ease the pain at all." Keats was angry with both Severn and Clark when they would not give him laudanum (opium). He repeatedly demanded "how long is this posthumous existence of mine to go on?"[70] Death[edit] The first months of 1821 marked a slow and steady decline into the final stage of tuberculosis. Keats was coughing up blood and covered in sweat. Severn nursed him devotedly and observed in a letter how Keats would sometimes cry upon waking to find himself still alive. Severn writes, Keats raves till I am in a complete tremble for him[70]...about four, the approaches of death came on. [Keats said] "Severn—I—lift me up—I am dying—I shall die easy; don't be frightened—be firm, and thank God it has come." I lifted him up in my arms. The phlegm seem'd boiling in his throat, and increased until eleven, when he gradually sank into death, so quiet, that I still thought he slept.[71] Keats' grave in Rome John Keats died in Rome on 23 February 1821. His body was buried in the city's Protestant Cemetery. His last request was to be placed under a tombstone bearing no name or date, only the words, "Here lies One whose Name was writ in Water." Severn and Brown erected the stone, which under a relief of a lyre with broken strings, includes the epitaph: This Grave / contains all that was Mortal / of a / Young English Poet / Who / on his Death Bed, in the Bitterness of his Heart / at the Malicious Power of his Enemies / Desired / these Words to be / engraven on his Tomb Stone: / Here lies One / Whose Name was writ in Water. 24 February 1821 The text bears an echo from Catullus LXX: Sed mulier cupido quod dicit amanti / in vento et rapida scribere oportet aqua (What a woman says to a passionate lover / should be written in the wind and the running water). Francis Beaumont also used the expression in The Nice Valour, Act 5, scene 5 (? 1616): All your better deeds / Shall be in water writ, but this in marble. Severn and Brown added their lines to the stone in protest at the critical reception of Keats' work. Hunt blamed his death on the Quarterly Review's scathing attack of "Endymion". As Byron quipped in his narrative poem Don Juan; 'Tis strange the mind, that very fiery particle Should let itself be snuffed out by an article. (canto 11, stanza 60) Seven weeks after the funeral, Shelley memorialised Keats in his poem Adonais.[72] Clark saw to the planting of daisies on the grave, saying that Keats would have wished it. For public health reasons, the Italian health authorities burned the furniture in Keats' room, scraped the walls and made new windows, doors and flooring.[73][74] The ashes of Shelley, one of Keats' most fervent champions, are buried in the cemetery and Joseph Severn is buried next to Keats. Describing the site today, Marsh wrote, "In the old part of the graveyard, barely a field when Keats was buried here, there are now umbrella pines, myrtle shrubs, roses, and carpets of wild violets".[67] Reception[edit] Relief on wall near his grave in Rome When Keats died at 25, he had been writing poetry seriously for only about six years, from 1814 until the summer of 1820; and publishing for only four. In his lifetime, sales of Keats' three volumes of poetry probably amounted to only 200 copies.[75] His first poem, the sonnet O Solitude, appeared in the Examiner in May 1816, while his collection Lamia, Isabella, The Eve of St. Agnes and other poems was published in July 1820 before his last visit to Rome. The compression of his poetic apprenticeship and maturity into so short a time is just one remarkable aspect of Keats' work.[1] Although prolific during his short career, and now one of the most studied and admired British poets, his reputation rests on a small body of work, centred on the Odes,[76] and only in the creative outpouring of the last years of his short life was he able to express the inner intensity for which he has been lauded since his death.[77] Keats was convinced that he had made no mark in his lifetime. Aware that he was dying, he wrote to Fanny Brawne in February 1820, "I have left no immortal work behind me – nothing to make my friends proud of my memory – but I have lov'd the principle of beauty in all things, and if I had had time I would have made myself remember'd."[78] Keats' ability and talent was acknowledged by several influential contemporary allies such as Shelley and Hunt.[75] His admirers praised him for thinking "on his pulses", for having developed a style which was more heavily loaded with sensualities, more gorgeous in its effects, more voluptuously alive than any poet who had come before him: "loading every rift with ore".[79] Shelley often corresponded with Keats in Rome and loudly declared that Keats' death had been brought on by bad reviews in the Quarterly Review. Seven weeks after the funeral he wrote Adonais, a despairing elegy,[80] stating that Keats' early death was a personal and public tragedy: The loveliest and the last, The bloom, whose petals nipped before they blew Died on the promise of the fruit.[81][82] Although Keats wrote that "if poetry comes not as naturally as the Leaves to a tree it had better not come at all", poetry did not come easily to him; his work was the fruit of a deliberate and prolonged classical self-education. He may have possessed an innate poetic sensibility, but his early works were clearly those of a young man learning his craft. His first attempts at verse were often vague, languorously narcotic and lacking a clear eye.[77] His poetic sense was based on the conventional tastes of his friend Charles Cowden Clarke, who first introduced him to the classics, and also came from the predilections of Hunt's Examiner, which Keats read as a boy.[83] Hunt scorned the Augustan or "French" school, dominated by Pope, and attacked the earlier Romantic poets Wordsworth and Coleridge, now in their forties, as unsophisticated, obscure and crude writers. Indeed, during Keats' few years as a published poet, the reputation of the older Romantic school was at its lowest ebb. Keats came to echo these sentiments in his work, identifying himself with a "new school" for a time, somewhat alienating him from Wordsworth, Coleridge and Byron and providing the basis for the scathing attacks from Blackwood's and The Quarterly.[83] Season of mists and mellow fruitfulness Close bosom-friend of the maturing sun Conspiring with him how to load and bless With fruit the vines that round the thatch-eaves run; To bend with apples the moss'd cottage-trees, And fill all fruit with ripeness to the core; To swell the gourd, and plump the hazel shells With a sweet kernel; to set budding more, And still more, later flowers for the bees, Until they think warm days will never cease, For Summer has o'er-brimm'd their clammy cells. First stanza of "To Autumn",[84] September 1819 By the time of his death, Keats had therefore been associated with the taints of both old and new schools: the obscurity of the first-wave Romantics and the uneducated affectation of Hunt's "Cockney School". Keats' posthumous reputation mixed the reviewers' caricature of the simplistic bumbler with the image of the hyper-sensitive genius killed by high feeling, which Shelley later portrayed.[83] The Victorian sense of poetry as the work of indulgence and luxuriant fancy offered a schema into which Keats was posthumously fitted. Marked as the standard-bearer of sensory writing, his reputation grew steadily and remarkably.[83] His work had the full support of the influential Cambridge Apostles, whose members included the young Tennyson,[nb 5] later a popular Poet Laureate who came to regard Keats as the greatest poet of the 19th century.[41] Constance Naden was a great admirer of his poems, arguing that his genius lay in his 'exquisite sensitiveness to all the elements of beauty'.[85] In 1848, twenty-seven years after Keats' death, Richard Monckton Milnes published the first full biography, which helped place Keats within the canon of English literature. The Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood, including Millais and Rossetti, were inspired by Keats and painted scenes from his poems including "The Eve of St. Agnes", "Isabella" and "La Belle Dame sans Merci", lush, arresting and popular images which remain closely associated with Keats' work.[83] In 1882, Swinburne wrote in the Encyclopædia Britannica that "the Ode to a Nightingale, [is] one of the final masterpieces of human work in all time and for all ages".[86] In the twentieth century, Keats remained the muse of poets such as Wilfred Owen, who kept his death date as a day of mourning, Yeats and T. S. Eliot.[83] Critic Helen Vendler stated the odes "are a group of works in which the English language find ultimate embodiment".[87] Bate declared of To Autumn: "Each generation has found it one of the most nearly perfect poems in English"[88] and M. R. Ridley claimed the ode "is the most serenely flawless poem in our language."[89] The largest collection of the letters, manuscripts, and other papers of Keats is in the Houghton Library at Harvard University. Other collections of material are archived at the British Library, Keats House, Hampstead, the Keats-Shelley Memorial House in Rome and the Pierpont Morgan Library in New York. Since 1998 the British Keats-Shelley Memorial Association have annually awarded a prize for romantic poetry.[90] A Royal Society of Arts blue plaque was unveiled in 1896 to commemorate Keats at Keats House.[91] Biographers[edit] None of Keats' biographies were written by people who had known him.[92] Shortly after his death, his publishers announced they would speedily publish The memoirs and remains of John Keats but his friends refused to cooperate and argued with each other to the extent that the project was abandoned. Leigh Hunt's Lord Byron and some of his Contemporaries (1828) gives the first biographical account, strongly emphasising Keats' supposedly humble origins, a misconception which still continues.[4] Given that he was becoming a significant figure within artistic circles, a succession of other publications followed, including anthologies of his many notes, chapters and letters.[92] However, early accounts often gave contradictory or heavily biased versions of events and were subject to dispute.[92] His friends Brown, Severn, Dilke, Shelley and his guardian Richard Abbey, his publisher Taylor, Fanny Brawne and many others issued posthumous commentary on Keats' life. These early writings coloured all subsequent biography and have become embedded in a body of Keats legend.[93] Shelley promoted Keats as someone whose achievement could not be separated from agony, who was 'spiritualised' by his decline and too fine-tuned to endure the harshness of life; the consumptive, suffering image popularly held today.[94] The first full biography was published in 1848 by Richard Monckton Milnes. Landmark Keats biographers since include Sidney Colvin, Robert Gittings, Walter Jackson Bate, Aileen Ward, and Andrew Motion. The idealised image of the heroic romantic poet who battled poverty and died young was inflated by the late arrival of an authoritative biography and the lack of an accurate likeness. Most of the surviving portraits of Keats were painted after his death, and those who knew him held that they did not succeed in capturing his unique quality and intensity.[4] Other portrayals[edit] Sculpture of poet John Keats (seated on bench) by Vincent Gray – Chichester, West Sussex, UK. August 2017 John Keats: His Life and Death, the first major motion picture about the life of Keats, was produced in 1973 by Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.. It was directed by John Barnes. John Stride played John Keats and Janina Faye played Fanny Brawne.[95] The 2009 film Bright Star, written and directed by Jane Campion, focuses on Keats' relationship with Fanny Brawne.[96] Inspired by the 1997 Keats biography penned by Andrew Motion, it stars Ben Whishaw as Keats and Abbie Cornish as Fanny.[97] In Dan Wells's book A Night of Blacker Darkness, John Keats is portrayed in a comedic tone. He is the companion and sidekick of the protagonist.[98] In Dan Simmons' book Hyperion, one of the characters is a clone of John Keats, of whom he possesses personality and memories.[99] In Tim Powers' book The Stress of Her Regard, John Keats, along with Percy Shelley and Lord Byron, is the victim of a vampire and his gift with language and poetry is a direct consequence of the vampire breed's attention.[100] Letters[edit] The poem On death on a wall at Breestraat 113 in Leiden, Netherlands. Keats' letters were first published in 1848 and 1878. During the 19th century, critics deemed them unworthy of attention, distractions from his poetic works.[101] During the 20th century they became almost as admired and studied as his poetry,[41] and are highly regarded within the canon of English literary correspondence.[102] T. S. Eliot described them as "certainly the most notable and most important ever written by any English poet."[41][103] Keats spent a great deal of time considering poetry itself, its constructs and impacts, displaying a deep interest unusual amongst his milieu who were more easily distracted by metaphysics or politics, fashions or science. Eliot wrote of Keats' conclusions; "There is hardly one statement of Keats' about poetry which ... will not be found to be true, and what is more, true for greater and more mature poetry than anything Keats ever wrote."[101][104] Few of Keats' letters are extant from the period before he joined his literary circle. From spring 1817, however, there is a rich record of his prolific letter writing.[4] Keats and his friends, poets, critics, novelists, and editors wrote to each other daily, and Keats' ideas are bound up in the ordinary, his day-to-day missives sharing news, parody and social commentary..[4] When his brother George went to America, Keats wrote to him in great detail, the body of letters becoming "the real diary" and self-revelation of Keats' life, as well as containing an exposition of his philosophy, and the first drafts of poems containing some of Keats' finest writing and thought.[105] Gittings describes them as akin to a "spiritual journal" not written for a specific other, so much as for synthesis.[101] Keats also reflected on the background and composition of his poetry, and specific letters often coincide with or anticipate the poems they describe.[101] In February to May 1819 he produced many of his finest letters.[4] Writing to his brother George, Keats explored the idea of the world as "the vale of Soul-making", anticipating the great odes that he would write some months later.[101][106] In the letters, Keats coined ideas such as the Mansion of Many Apartments and the Chameleon Poet, concepts that came to gain common currency and capture the public imagination, despite only making single appearances as phrases in his correspondence.[107] The poetical mind, Keats argued: has no self – it is every thing and nothing – It has no character – it enjoys light and shade;... What shocks the virtuous philosopher, delights the camelion [chameleon] Poet. It does no harm from its relish of the dark side of things any more than from its taste for the bright one; because they both end in speculation. A Poet is the most unpoetical of any thing in existence; because he has no Identity – he is continually in for – and filling some other Body – The Sun, the Moon, the Sea and Men and Women who are creatures of impulse are poetical and have about them an unchangeable attribute – the poet has none; no identity – he is certainly the most unpoetical of all God's Creatures. He used the term negative capability to discuss the state in which we are "capable of being in uncertainties, Mysteries, doubts without any irritable reaching after fact & reason ...[Being] content with half knowledge" where one trusts in the heart's perceptions.[108] He wrote later: "I am certain of nothing but the holiness of the Heart's affections and the truth of Imagination – What the imagination seizes as Beauty must be truth – whether it existed before or not – for I have the same Idea of all our Passions as of Love they are all in their sublime, creative of essential Beauty"[109] again and again turning to the question of what it means to be a poet.[40] "My Imagination is a Monastery and I am its Monk", Keats notes to Shelley. In September 1819, Keats wrote to Reynolds "How beautiful the season is now – How fine the air. A temperate sharpness about it  ... I never lik'd the stubbled fields as much as now – Aye, better than the chilly green of spring. Somehow the stubble plain looks warm – in the same way as some pictures look warm – this struck me so much in my Sunday's walk that I composed upon it".[110] The final stanza of his last great ode, "To Autumn", runs: Where are the songs of Spring? Ay, where are they? Think not of them, thou hast thy music too,- While barred clouds bloom the soft-dying day, And touch the stubble-plains with rosy hue;[84] Later, "To Autumn" became one of the most highly regarded poems in the English language.[nb 6][nb 7] There are areas of his life and daily routine that Keats does not describe. He mentions little about his childhood or his financial straits and is seemingly embarrassed to discuss them. There is a total absence of any reference to his parents.[4] In his last year, as his health deteriorated, his concerns often give way to despair and morbid obsessions. The publications of letters to Fanny Brawne in 1870 focus on this period and emphasise this tragic aspect, giving rise to widespread criticism at the time.[101] Major Works[edit] Main article: John Keats bibliography Cox, Jeffrey N., ed., Keats's Poetry and Prose (New York and London: W.W. Norton & Co., 2008). ISBN 978-0393924916 Wolfson, Susan, ed., John Keats (London and New York: Longman, 2007). Allott, Miriam, ed., The Complete Poems (London and New York: Longman, 1970). Scott, Grant F., ed., Selected Letters of John Keats (Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2002). Stillinger, Jack, ed., John Keats: Poetry Manuscripts at Harvard, a Facsimile Edition (Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1990). ISBN 0-674-47775-8 Stillinger, Jack, ed., The Poems of John Keats (Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1978). Hyder Edward Rollins, ed., The Letters of John Keats 1814–1821, 2 vols. (Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1958). Forman, H. Buxton, ed., The Complete Poetical Works of John Keats (Oxford: Oxford UP, 1907). Scudder, Horace E., ed., The Complete Poetical Works and Letters of John Keats (Boston: Riverside Press, 1899). Notes[edit] ^ Keats' share would have increased on the death of his brother Tom in 1818. ^ The original plum tree no longer survives, though others have been planted since. ^ The Quarterly Review. April 1818. 204–08. "It is not, we say, that the author has not powers of language, rays of fancy, and gleams of genius – he has all these; but he is unhappily a disciple of the new school of what has been somewhere called 'Cockney Poetry'; which may be defined to consist of the most incongruous ideas in the most uncouth language ... There is hardly a complete couplet enclosing a complete idea in the whole book. He wanders from one subject to another, from the association, not of ideas, but of sounds." ^ Extracts from Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine, 3 (1818) p519-24". Nineteenth Century Literary Manuscripts, Part 4. Retrieved 29 January 2010. "To witness the disease of any human understanding, however feeble, is distressing; but the spectacle of an able mind reduced to a state of insanity is, of course, ten times more afflicting. It is with such sorrow as this that we have contemplated the case of Mr John Keats .... He was bound apprentice some years ago to a worthy apothecary in town. But all has been undone by a sudden attack of the malady ... For some time we were in hopes that he might get off with a violent fit or two; but of late the symptoms are terrible. The phrenzy of the "Poems" was bad enough in its way; but it did not alarm us half so seriously as the calm, settled, imperturbable drivelling idiocy of Endymion .... It is a better and a wiser thing to be a starved apothecary than a starved poet; so back to the [apothecary] shop Mr John, back to 'plasters, pills, and ointment boxes' ". ^ Tennyson was writing Keats-style poetry in the 1830s and was being critically attacked in the same manner as his predecessor. ^ Bate p581: "Each generation has found it one of the most nearly perfect poems in English." ^ The 1888 Encyclopædia Britannica declared that, "Of these [odes] perhaps the two nearest to absolute perfection, to the triumphant achievement and accomplishment of the very utmost beauty possible to human words, may be that of to Autumn and that on a Grecian Urn" Baynes, Thomas (Ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica Vol XIV. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1888. OCLC 1387837. 23 References[edit] ^ a b c d O'Neill and Mahoney (1988), 418 ^ Jorge Luis Borges (2000). This Craft of Verse. Harvard University Press, 98–101 ^ a b Motion (1997), 10 ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w Kelvin Everest, "Keats, John (1795–1821)", Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004 Online (subscription only) ^ "Literary gossip". The Week : A Canadian Journal of Politics, Literature, Science and Arts. 1 (4): 61. 27 December 1883. Retrieved 23 April 2013. ^ Gittings (1968), 11 ^ "Two become one at The Globe". Evening Standard. 12 August 2008. Retrieved 17 September 2012. ^ Gittings (1968), 24 ^ Harrow. Motion (1998), 22 ^ Milnes (1848) ^ a b c d e Gittings (1987), 1–3 ^ John Keats, Colvin, S, (1917) ^ Monckton Milnes (1848), xiii ^ Motion (1999), 46 ^ Motion, Andrew (1999). Keats. University of Chicago Press. p. 43. ISBN 978-0-226-54240-9. ^ "See the British National Archives for conversion rates". Nationalarchives.gov.uk. Retrieved 1 March 2014. ^ Motion (1998), 74 ^ Motion (1998), 98 ^ Motion (1997), 94 ^ a b Hirsch, Edward (2001) ^ Colvin (2006), 35 ^ Keats, John (1816). "Sonnett VIII. To My Brothers". Poemist.com. Retrieved 31 October 2015. ^ Motion (1998), 104–5 ^ Motion proposes that the Olliers suggested Keats leave their publishing lists. See Motion (1997) p156 ^ Motion (1997), 156 ^ Motion (1997), 157 ^ Gittings (1968), 155 ^ Motion (1997), 116–120 ^ Motion (1997) 130 ^ Keats' letter to Benjamin Bailey, 22 November 1817 ^ Bate (1964) p632 ^ Motion (1997), 365–66 ^ Motion (1997), 364, 184 ^ Tracing the Keats Family in America New York Times Koch 30 July 1922. Retrieved 29 January 2010. ^ Motion (1997), 494 ^ Letter of 7 August 1818; Brown (1937) ^ Motion (1997), 290 ^ Zur Pathogenie der Impetigines. Auszug aus einer brieflichen Mitteilung an den Herausgeber. [Müller's] Archiv für Anatomie, Physiologie und wissenschaftliche Medicin. 1839, p82. ^ De Almeida (1991), 206–07; Motion (1997), 500–01 ^ a b O'Neill and Mahoney (1988), 419 ^ a b c d "Keats, John" The Oxford Companion to English Literature. Edited by Dinah Birch. Oxford University Press Inc. ^ Charles Armitage Brown (1937) 53–54 ^ Hart, Christopher. (2 August 2009.) "Savour John Keats' poetry in garden where he wrote". The Sunday Times. Retrieved 29 January 2010. ^ Bate (1963), 63 ^ Keats, John; Gittings, Robert (1970). The odes of Keats and their earliest known manuscripts. Kent State University Press. ISBN 978-0873380997. ^ Motion (1997) pp204-5 ^ A preface to Keats (1985) Cedric Thomas Watts, Longman, University of Michigan p90 ISBN 9780582353671 ^ Gittings (1968), 504 ^ a b Kennedy, Maev. "Keats' London home reopens after major refurbishment". The Guardian, 22 July 2009. Retrieved 29 January 2010. ^ a b Motion (1997), 180–1 ^ a b c Gittings (1968), 139 ^ Walsh William (1981) Introduction to Keats Law Book Co of Australasia p81 ^ Gittings (1956), Mask of Keats. Heinmann, 45 ^ Gittings (1968), 262 ^ Gittings (1968), 268 ^ Gittings (1968), 264 ^ a b Gittings (1968), 293–298 ^ a b Gittings (1968), 327–331 ^ Houghton Library, Harvard University, I shall ever be your dearest love: John Keats and Fanny Brawne. "1820". ^ Richardson, 1952, 112 ^ Bate (1964), 636 ^ Motion (1997), 496 ^ Porter, Roy (1 April 1998). The Greatest Benefit to Mankind: A Medical History of Humanity (The Norton History of Science). W. W. Norton & Company. p. 440?. ISBN 978-0393046342. ^ McCormick, Eric Hall (23 February 1989). The Friend of Keats: A Life of Charles Armitage Brown. Victoria University Press. p. 60. ISBN 9780864730817. Retrieved 23 February 2019 – via Google Books. ^ Rodriguez, Andres; Rodríguez, Andrés (7 September 1993). Book of the Heart: The Poetics, Letters, and Life of John Keats. SteinerBooks. ISBN 9780940262577 – via Google Books. ^ Thomas Hardy’s poem ‘At Lulworth Cove a Century Back’, September 1920, commemorates Keats’ landing on the Dorset coast on the voyage to Rome ^ a b "A window to the soul of John Keats" by Marsh, Stefanie. The Times, 2 November 2009. Retrieved 29 January 2010. ^ Keats' Last Letter, written to Charles Armitage Brown from Rome, 30 November 1820 ^ Brown (2009) ^ a b c Flood, Alison. "Doctor's mistakes to blame for Keats' agonising end, says new biography". The Guardian, 26 October 2009. Retrieved 29 January 2010. ^ Colvin (1917), 208 ^ Adonais: An Elegy on the Death of John Keats. Representative Poetry Online. Retrieved 29 January 2010. ^ Richardson, 1952, p89. ^ "Keats's keeper". Motion, Andrew. The Guardian, 7 May 2005. Retrieved 29 January 2010. ^ a b Andrew Motion (23 January 2010). "Article 23 January 2010 An introduction to the poetry of John Keats". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 15 February 2010. ^ Strachan (2003), 2 ^ a b Walsh (1957), 220–221 ^ "John-Keats.com - Letters". www.john-keats.com. Retrieved 23 February 2019. ^ Keats Letter To Percy Bysshe Shelley, 16 August 1820 ^ Adonais by Shelley is a despairing elegy of 495 lines and 55 Spenserian stanzas. It was published that July 1820 and he came to view it as his "least imperfect" work. ^ Adonais (Adonais: An Elegy on the Death of John Keats, Author of Endymion, Hyperion, etc.) by Shelley, published 1821 ^ "Adonais: An Elegy on the Death of John Keats | Representative Poetry Online". rpo.library.utoronto.ca. ^ a b c d e f Gittings (1987), 18–21 ^ a b Gittings (1987), 157 ^ 'Poesy Club', Mason College Magazine, 4.5 (October 1886), 106. ^ "Keats, John". Encyclopædia Britannica, Ninth Edition, Vol. XIV. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1882. 22–24 ^ Vendler (1983) 60 ^ Bate (1963) 581 ^ Ridley & Clarendon (1933) 289 ^ The Keats-Shelley Poetry Award. Retrieved 11 February 2010. ^ "KEATS, JOHN (1795–1821)". English Heritage. Retrieved 23 October 2012. ^ a b c Gittings (1968), 3 ^ Gittings (1968), 5 ^ Motion (1997), 499 ^ "John Keats: His Life and Death". Retrieved 23 February 2019 – via www.imdb.com. ^ The Academy of American Poets "Bright Star": Campion's Film About the Life and Love of Keats. ^ "Talking Pictures: 'Bright Star' – 2 1/2 stars". ^ "A Night of Blacker Darkness". Goodreads. Retrieved 6 February 2017. ^ "Hyperion (Hyperion Cantos, #1)". Goodreads. Retrieved 6 February 2017. ^ "The Stress of Her Regard". Goodreads. Retrieved 6 February 2017. ^ a b c d e f Gittings (1987), 12–17 ^ Strachan (2003), 12 ^ T. S. Eliot The Use of Poetry and the Use of Criticism (1937) p100 ^ T. S. Eliot The Use of Poetry and the Use of Criticism (1937) p101 ^ Gittings (1968), 66 ^ Letter to George Keats, Sunday 14 February 1819 ^ Scott, Grant (ed.), Selected Letters of John Keats, Harvard University Press (2002) ^ Wu, Duncan (2005) Romanticism: an anthology: Edition: 3, illustrated. Blackwell, 2005 p.1351. citing Letter to George Keats. Sunday, 21 December 1817 ^ Keats letter to Benjamin Bailey, 22 November 1817 ^ Houghton (2008), 184 Sources[edit] Bate, Walter Jackson (1964). John Keats. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Bate, Walter Jackson (2012). Negative Capability: The Intuitive Approach in Keats (1965), reprinted with a new intro by Maura Del Serra. New York: Contra Mundum Press, 2012. Brown, Charles Armitage (1937). The Life of John Keats, ed. London: Oxford University Press. Brown, Sue (2009). Joseph Severn, A Life: The Rewards of Friendship. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-956502-3 Chapman, D. (2012). What's in an Urn?, Concept, ISBN 978-1291143119. Colvin, Sidney (1917). John Keats: His Life and Poetry, His Friends Critics and After-Fame. London: Macmillan. Colvin, Sidney (1970). John Keats: His Life and Poetry, His Friends, Critics, and After-Fame. New York: Octagon Books. Coote, Stephen (1995). John Keats. A Life. London: Hodder & Stoughton. De Almeida, Hermione (1991). Romantic Medicine and John Keats. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-506307-4 Gittings, Robert (1954). John Keats: The Living Year. 21 September 1818 to 21 September 1819. London: Heinemann. Gittings, Robert (1964). The Keats Inheritance. London: Heinemann. Gittings, Robert (1968). John Keats. London: Heinemann. Gittings, Robert (1987) Selected poems and letters of Keats London: Heinemann. Goslee, Nancy (1985). Uriel's Eye: Miltonic Stationing and Statuary in Blake, Keats and Shelley. University of Alabama Press. ISBN 0-8173-0243-3 Hewlett, Dorothy (3rd rev. ed. 1970). A life of John Keats. London: Hutchinson. Hirsch, Edward (Ed.) (2001). Complete Poems and Selected Letters of John Keats. Random House Publishing. ISBN 0-375-75669-8 Houghton, Richard (Ed.) (2008). The Life and Letters of John Keats. Read Books. ISBN 978-1-4097-9103-4 Jones, Michael (1984). "Twilight of the Gods: The Greeks in Schiller and Lukacs". Germanic Review. 59 (2): 49–56. doi:10.1080/00168890.1984.9935401. Lachman, Lilach (1988). "History and Temporalization of Space: Keats' Hyperion Poems". Proceedings of the XII Congress of the International Comparative Literature Association, edited by Roger Bauer and Douwe Fokkema (Munich, Germany): 159–164. G. M. Matthews (Ed). (1995). "John Keats: The Critical Heritage". London: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-13447-1 Monckton Milnes, Richard, ed. (Lord Houghton) (1848). Life, Letters and Literary Remains of John Keats. 2 vols. London: Edward Moxon. Motion, Andrew (1997). Keats. London: Faber. O'Neill, Michael & Mahoney Charles (Eds.) (2007). Romantic Poetry: An Annotated Anthology. Blackwell. ISBN 0-631-21317-1 Ridley, M. and R. Clarendon (1933). Keats' craftsmanship: a study in poetic development ASIN: B00085UM2I (Out of Print in 2010). Scott, Grant F. (1994). The Sculpted Word: Keats, Ekphrasis, and the Visual Arts. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England. ISBN 0-87451-679-X Stillinger, Jack (1982). Complete Poems. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. ISBN 0-674-15430-4 Strachan, John (Ed.) (2003). A Routledge Literary Sourcebook on the Poems of John Keats. New York: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-23478-6 Vendler, Helen (1983). The Odes of John Keats. Belknap Press ISBN 0-674-63076-9 Walsh, John Evangelist (1999). Darkling I Listen: The Last Days and Death of John Keats. New York: St. Martin's Press. Walsh, William (1957). "John Keats", in From Blake to Byron. Middlesex: Penguin. Ward, Aileen (1963). John Keats: The Making of a Poet. London: Secker & Warburg. Wolfson, Susan J. (1986). The Questioning Presence. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press. ISBN 0-8014-1909-3 Further reading[edit] Bate, Walter Jackson. Negative Capability: The Intuitive Approach in Keats. New York: Contra Mundum Press, 2012. Cox, Jeffrey N. Poetry and Politics in the Cockney School: Keats, Shelley, Hunt and Their Circle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. ISBN 978-0521604239 Kirkland, John (2008). Love Letters of Great Men, Vol. 1. CreateSpace Publishing. Kottoor, Gopikrishnan (1994). The Mask of Death: The Final Days of John Keats, (A Radio Play). Writers WorkShop Kolkata, 1994. Lowell, Amy (1925). John Keats. 2 vols. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Parson, Donald (1954). Portraits of Keats. Cleveland: World Publishing Co. Plumly, Stanley (2008). Posthumous Keats. New York: W.W. Norton & Co. Richardson, Joanna (1963). The Everlasting Spell. A Study of Keats and His Friends. London: Cape. Richardson, Joanna (1980). Keats and His Circle. An Album of Portraits. London: Cassell. Roe, Nicholas (2012). John Keats. A New Life. New Haven and London: Yale University Press ISBN 978-0-300-12465-1 Rossetti, William Michael (1887). The Life and Writings of John Keats. London: Walter Scott. Turley, Richard Marggraf (2004). Keats' Boyish Imagination. London: Routledge, ISBN 978-0-415-28882-8 External links[edit] Poetry portal Wikimedia Commons has media related to John Keats. Wikiquote has quotations related to: John Keats Wikisource has original works written by or about: John Keats John Keats on the British Library's Discovering Literature website John Keats at the Poetry Foundation Biography of Keats at poets.org Works by John Keats at Project Gutenberg Works by or about John Keats at Internet Archive Works by John Keats at LibriVox (public domain audiobooks) The Harvard Keats Collection at the Houghton Library, Harvard University Keats House, Hampstead: official website The Keats-Shelley House museum in Rome John Keats at the National Portrait Gallery Keats, John (1795–1821) Poet at the National Register of Archives Mapping Keats's Progress: A Critical Chronology v t e John Keats Bibliography John Keats bibliography List of poems by John Keats Poetry collections 1819 odes (1819) Short poems "On First Looking into Chapman's Homer" (1816) "Sleep and Poetry" (1817) "Ode to a Nightingale" (1819) "La Belle Dame sans Merci" (1820) "Ode on a Grecian Urn" (1820) "Ode on Melancholy" (1820) "Ode to Psyche" (1820) "To Autumn" (1820) "Bright star, would I were stedfast as thou art" (1838) "Ode on Indolence" (1848) "When I have Fears that I may Cease to Be" (1848) "You say you love; but with a voice" (1914) Long poems Endymion (1818) Isabella, or the Pot of Basil (1820) Hyperion (1820) Lamia (1820) The Eve of St. Agnes (1820) The Fall of Hyperion: A Dream (1856–57) People Fanny Brawne Charles Armitage Brown Charles Cowden Clarke Charles Wentworth Dilke Benjamin Haydon Leigh Hunt George Keats John Hamilton Reynolds Joseph Severn Percy Bysshe Shelley (Adonais) John Taylor Related Keats House Keats–Shelley Memorial House "negative capability" Keats and His Nightingale: A Blind Date Bright Star v t e Romanticism Countries Denmark England (literature) France (literature) Germany Norway Poland Russia (literature) Scotland Spain (literature) Sweden (literature) Movements Bohemianism Coppet group Counter-Enlightenment Dark romanticism Düsseldorf School Gesamtkunstwerk Gothic fiction Gothic Revival (architecture) Hudson River School Indianism Jena Romanticism Lake Poets Nazarene movement Ossian Romantic hero Romanticism and Bacon Romanticism in science Romantic nationalism Romantic poetry Opium and Romanticism Transcendentalism Ultra-Romanticism Wallenrodism Writers Abovian Abreu Alencar Alfieri Alves Andersen A. v. Arnim B. v. Arnim Azevedo Baratashvili Baratynsky Barbauld (Aikin) Batyushkov Baudelaire Bécquer Beer Bertrand Blake Botev Brentano Bryant Burns Byron Castelo Branco Castilho Chateaubriand Chavchavadze Clare Coleridge Cooper De Quincey Dias Dumas Eichendorff Emerson Eminescu Espronceda Fouqué Foscolo Frashëri Fredro Freire Garrett Gautier Goethe Grimm Brothers Günderrode Gutiérrez Gutzkow Hauff Hawthorne Heine Heliade Herculano Hoffmann Hölderlin Hugo Kostić Irving Isaacs Jakšić Jean Paul Karamzin Keats Kleist Krasiński Küchelbecker Lamartine Landor Lenau Leopardi Lermontov Longfellow Lowell Macedonski Macedo Mácha Magalhães Malczewski Manzoni Maturin Mérimée Mickiewicz Mörike Musset Nalbandian Nerval Njegoš Nodier Norwid Novalis Oehlenschläger O'Neddy Orbeliani Poe Polidori Potocki Prešeren Pushkin Raffi Saavedra Sand Schiller Schwab Scott Seward M. Shelley P. B. Shelley Shevchenko Słowacki Southey De Staël Stendhal Tieck Tyutchev Uhland Varela Vörösmarty Vyazemsky Wordsworth Zhukovsky Zorrilla Music Adam Alkan Auber Beethoven Bellini Bennett Berlioz Bertin Berwald Busoni Brahms Bruch Bruckner Cherubini Chopin Czerny Félicien David Ferdinand David Donizetti Dvořák Elgar Fauré Field Franck Franz Glinka Grieg Gomis Halévy Hummel Joachim Kalkbrenner Liszt Loewe Mahler Marschner Masarnau Medtner Méhul Fanny Mendelssohn Felix Mendelssohn Méreaux Meyerbeer Moniuszko Moscheles Moszkowski Mussorgsky Niedermeyer Onslow Paganini Paderewski Prudent Rachmaninoff Reicha Rimsky-Korsakov Rossini Rubinstein Saint-Saëns Schubert Clara Schumann Robert Schumann Scriabin Sibelius Smetana Sor Spohr Spontini Richard Strauss Tchaikovsky Thalberg Verdi Voříšek Wagner Weber Wolf Theologians and philosophers Barante Belinsky Berchet Chaadayev Coleridge Constant Díaz Emerson Feuerbach Fichte Goethe Hazlitt Hegel Hunt Khomyakov Lamennais Larra Mazzini Michelet Müller Pellico Quinet Ritschl Rousseau Schiller A. Schlegel F. Schlegel Schleiermacher Senancour De Staël Tieck Wackenroder Visual artists Aivazovsky Bierstadt Blake Bonington Bryullov Chassériau Church Constable Cole Corot Dahl David d'Angers Delacroix Friedrich Fuseli Géricault Girodet Głowacki Goya Gude Hayez Janmot Jones Kiprensky Koch Lampi Leutze Loutherbourg Maison Martin Michałowski Palmer Porto-Alegre Préault Révoil Richard Rude Runge Saleh Scheffer Stattler Stroj Tidemand Todorović Tropinin Turner Veit Ward Wiertz Related topics German idealism Historical fiction Mal du siècle Medievalism Neo-romanticism Preromanticism Post-romanticism Sturm und Drang  « Age of Enlightenment Realism »  Authority control BNE: XX898433 BNF: cb12174982p (data) CANTIC: a11255201 GND: 118560883 ICCU: IT\ICCU\CFIV\004564 ISNI: 0000 0001 2137 2872 LCCN: n80035884 MBA: d0639a62-b2da-4c22-ae84-ea81956944e3 NDL: 00445340 NKC: jo20000080652 NLA: 35262972 NLK: KAC199614556 NTA: 068633734 RKD: 43696 SELIBR: 193132 SNAC: w68p60xk SUDOC: 030306760 Trove: 887812 ULAN: 500027688 VcBA: 495/118483 VIAF: 66508882 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n80035884 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Keats&oldid=995532634" Categories: 1795 births 1821 deaths 19th-century English writers 19th-century poets Alumni of King's College London Burials in the Protestant Cemetery, Rome 19th-century deaths from tuberculosis Epic poets English letter writers People from the City of London Romantic poets Sonneteers Writers from London 19th-century English poets English male poets 19th-century male writers English expatriates in Italy Tuberculosis deaths in Italy Infectious disease deaths in Lazio Hidden categories: CS1: Julian–Gregorian uncertainty Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata Use dmy dates from April 2020 Articles with hCards Articles containing Latin-language text Commons category link is on Wikidata Articles with Project Gutenberg links Articles with Internet Archive links Articles with LibriVox links Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CANTIC identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ICCU identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with MusicBrainz identifiers Wikipedia articles with NDL identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with RKDartists identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SNAC-ID identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with Trove identifiers Wikipedia articles with ULAN identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikiquote Wikisource Wikiversity Languages Afrikaans العربية Aragonés অসমীয়া Asturianu تۆرکجه বাংলা Bân-lâm-gú Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ भोजपुरी Български Bosanski Brezhoneg Català Чӑвашла Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Føroyskt Français Gaeilge Galego 贛語 한국어 Հայերեն हिन्दी Hrvatski Ido Bahasa Indonesia Italiano עברית ಕನ್ನಡ ქართული Latina Latviešu Lietuvių Limburgs Lingua Franca Nova Magyar मैथिली Македонски Malagasy മലയാളം မြန်မာဘာသာ Nederlands नेपाली 日本語 Norsk bokmål Norsk nynorsk ਪੰਜਾਬੀ پنجابی Polski Português Română Русский संस्कृतम् Simple English سنڌي Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Tagalog தமிழ் Татарча/tatarça ไทย Türkçe Українська اردو Vahcuengh Tiếng Việt Winaray 吴语 Yorùbá 粵語 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 21 December 2020, at 15:37 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2451 ---- Iamb (poetry) - Wikipedia Iamb (poetry) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Metrical foot Metrical feet and accents Disyllables ˘ ˘ pyrrhic, dibrach ˘ ¯ iamb ¯ ˘ trochee, choree ¯ ¯ spondee Trisyllables ˘ ˘ ˘ tribrach ¯ ˘ ˘ dactyl ˘ ¯ ˘ amphibrach ˘ ˘ ¯ anapaest, antidactylus ˘ ¯ ¯ bacchius ¯ ¯ ˘ antibacchius ¯ ˘ ¯ cretic, amphimacer ¯ ¯ ¯ molossus See main article for tetrasyllables. v t e An iamb (/ˈaɪæm/) or iambus is a metrical foot used in various types of poetry. Originally the term referred to one of the feet of the quantitative meter of classical Greek prosody: a short syllable followed by a long syllable (as in "above"). This terminology was adopted in the description of accentual-syllabic verse in English, where it refers to a foot comprising an unstressed syllable followed by a stressed syllable (as in a-bove). Contents 1 Etymology 2 Accentual-syllabic use 3 Types of meter 3.1 Dimeter 3.2 Trimeter 3.3 Tetrameter 3.4 Pentameter 3.5 Hexameter 3.6 Heptameter 4 Sound change 5 See also 6 Notes 7 References 8 External links Etymology[edit] Main article: Iambus (genre) R. S. P. Beekes has suggested that the Ancient Greek: ἴαμβος iambos has a Pre-Greek origin.[1] An old hypothesis is that the word is borrowed from Phrygian or Pelasgian, and literally means "Einschritt", i. e., "one-step", compare dithyramb and thriambus, but H. S. Versnel rejects this etymology and suggests instead a derivation from a cultic exclamation.[2] The word may be related to Iambe, a Greek minor goddess of verse, especially scurrilous, ribald humour. In ancient Greece iambus was mainly satirical poetry, lampoons, which did not automatically imply a particular metrical type. Iambic metre took its name from being characteristic of iambi, not vice versa.[3] Accentual-syllabic use[edit] A metrical tree representation of an iamb. W = weak syllable, S = strong syllable An alternative metrical tree representation of an iamb. F = foot, σ = syllable. The head of the foot constituent, i.e. the stressed syllable, is indicated with a vertical line. A bracketed grid representation of an iamb. The x's in the lower grid are syllables, the x in the upper grid indicates the position of the stressed syllable. In accentual-syllabic verse an iamb is a foot that has the rhythmic pattern: da DUM Using the 'ictus and x' notation (see systems of scansion for a full discussion of various notations) we can write this as: x / The word 'attempt' is a natural iamb: x / at- tempt In phonology, an iambic foot is notated in a flat representation as (σ'σ) or as foot tree with two branches W and S where W = weak and S = strong. Iambic pentameter is one of the most commonly used measures in English and German poetry, for instance it can be found Shakespeare's Sonnets.[4] A line of iambic pentameter comprises five consecutive iambs. Iambic trimeter is the metre of the spoken verses in Greek tragedy and comedy, comprising six iambs—as one iambic metrum consisted of two iambs. In English accentual-syllabic verse, iambic trimeter is a line comprising three iambs. Less common iambic measures include iambic tetrameter (four iambs per line) and iambic heptameter, sometimes called the "fourteener" (seven iambs per line). Lord Byron's also "She Walks in Beauty" exemplifies iambic tetrameter; iambic heptameter is found in Australian poet A. B. "Banjo" Paterson's "The Man from Ironbark". Related to iambic heptameter is the more common ballad verse (also called common metre), in which a line of iambic tetrameter is succeeded by a line of iambic trimeter, usually in quatrain form. Samuel Taylor Coleridge's The Rime of the Ancient Mariner is a classic example of this form. The reverse of an iamb is called a trochee. Types of meter[edit] Key: Non-bold = unstressed syllable Bold = stressed syllable Dimeter[edit] Iambic dimeter is a meter referring to a line consisting of two iambic feet. The way a crow Shook down on me.... (Robert Frost, "Dust of Snow") Trimeter[edit] Main article: Iambic trimeter Iambic trimeter is a meter referring to a line consisting of three iambic feet. We romped until the pans Slid from the kitchen shelf; (Theodore Roethke, "My Papa's Waltz") The only news I know Is bulletins all day (Emily Dickinson, "The Only News I Know") Tetrameter[edit] Main article: Iambic tetrameter Iambic tetrameter is a meter referring to a line consisting of four iambic feet: She walks in beauty, like the night Of cloudless climes and starry skies; (Lord Byron, "She Walks in Beauty") Pentameter[edit] Main article: Iambic pentameter Iambic Pentameter is a meter referring to a line consisting of five iambic feet: To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield. (Alfred Tennyson, "Ulysses") Shall I compare thee to a summer's day? (William Shakespeare, Sonnet 18) (Although, it could be argued that this line in fact reads: Shall I compare thee to a summer's day? Meter is often broken in this way, sometimes for intended effect and sometimes simply due to the sound of the words in the line. Where the stresses lie can be debated, as it depends greatly on where the reader decides to place the stresses. Although in this meter the foot is no longer iambs but trochees.)[original research?] A horse! A horse! My kingdom for a horse! (William Shakespeare, Richard III) Hexameter[edit] Main article: Iambic hexameter Iambic hexameter is a meter referring to a line consisting of six iambic feet. In English verse, "alexandrine" is typically used to mean "iambic hexameter" Ye sacred Bards, that to ¦ your harps' melodious strings Sung th'ancient Heroes' deeds (the monuments of Kings) (Michael Drayton, Poly-Olbion) Heptameter[edit] Main article: Iambic heptameter Iambic Heptameter is a meter referring to a line consisting of seven iambic feet: I s'pose the flats is pretty green up there in Ironbark. (A. B. Paterson, The Man from Ironbark) Sound change[edit] Main article: Latin spelling and pronunciation § Iambic shortening Through iambic shortening, a word with the shape light–heavy or short–long changes to become light–light. See also[edit] Look up iamb in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. Common metre Long metre Prosody (Latin) Short metre Notes[edit] ^ R. S. P. Beekes, Etymological Dictionary of Greek, Brill, 2009, p. 572. ^ Versnel, H. S. (1970). "I. 2 Θρίαμβος". Triumphus: An Inquiry Into the Origin, Development and Meaning of the Roman Triumph. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill Publishers. pp. 16–38. ISBN 90-04-02325-9. Retrieved 2 January 2015. ^ Studies in Greek elegy and iambus By Martin Litchfield West Page 22 ISBN 3-11-004585-0 ^ "Poetry 101: What Is a Shakespearean Sonnet? Learn About Shakespearean Sonnets With Examples". MasterClass. Master Class. Retrieved 11 November 2020. References[edit] Murfin, Ross C.; Ray, Supryia M. (2009). The Bedford Glossary of Critical and Literary Terms. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's. ISBN 978-0-312-46188-1. LCCN 2008925882. External links[edit] "Iambic" . Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed.). 1911. Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Iamb_(poetry)&oldid=988208186" Categories: Metrical feet Phonology Hidden categories: Articles with short description Short description matches Wikidata Articles containing Ancient Greek (to 1453)-language text All articles that may contain original research Articles that may contain original research from February 2016 Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica with Wikisource reference Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Alemannisch Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ Български Català Чӑвашла Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Estremeñu Euskara Français Galego 贛語 Հայերեն Ido Íslenska Italiano ქართული Кыргызча Latina Latviešu Magyar Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Norsk nynorsk Polski Português Română Русский Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Українська 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 11 November 2020, at 19:35 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2458 ---- Neume - Wikipedia Neume From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia   (Redirected from Neumes) Jump to navigation Jump to search "Daseia" redirects here. For the Greek diacritic, see rough breathing. A sample of Kýrie Eléison XI (Orbis Factor) from the Liber Usualis. Listen to it interpreted. A neume (/ˈnjuːm/; sometimes spelled neum)[1][2][3] is the basic element of Western and Eastern systems of musical notation prior to the invention of five-line staff notation. The earliest neumes were inflective marks that indicated the general shape but not necessarily the exact notes or rhythms to be sung. Later developments included the use of heightened neumes that showed the relative pitches between neumes, and the creation of a four-line musical staff that identified particular pitches. Neumes do not generally indicate rhythm, but additional symbols were sometimes juxtaposed with neumes to indicate changes in articulation, duration, or tempo. Neumatic notation was later used in medieval music to indicate certain patterns of rhythm called rhythmic modes, and eventually evolved into modern musical notation. Neumatic notation remains standard in modern editions of plainchant. Contents 1 Etymology 2 Early history 3 Western plainchant 4 Solesmes notation 5 Rhythmic interpretation 6 Illustrations 6.1 Clefs 6.2 Single notes 6.3 Two notes 6.4 Three notes 6.5 Compound neumes 6.6 Other basic markings 6.7 Interpretive marks 7 Other functions 8 Other types 9 Digital notation 10 See also 11 Notes 12 References 13 External links Etymology[edit] The word "neume" entered the English language in the Middle English forms "newme", "nevme", "neme" in the 15th century, from the Middle French "neume", in turn from either medieval Latin "pneuma" or "neuma", the former either from ancient Greek πνεῦμα pneuma ("breath") or νεῦμα neuma ("sign"),[4][5] or else directly from Greek as a corruption or an adaptation of the former.[6][citation needed] Early history[edit] Although chant was probably sung since the earliest days of the church, for centuries they were only transmitted orally. The earliest known systems involving neumes are of Aramaic origin and were used to notate inflections in the quasi-emmelic (melodic) recitation of the Christian holy scriptures. As such they resemble functionally a similar system used for the notation of recitation of the Qur'an, the holy book of Islam. This early system was called ekphonetic notation, from the Greek ἐκφώνησις ekphonesis meaning quasi-melodic recitation of text. Around the 9th century neumes began to become shorthand mnemonic aids for the proper melodic recitation of chant.[7] A prevalent view is that neumatic notation was first developed in the Eastern Roman Empire. This seems plausible given the well-documented peak of musical composition and cultural activity in major cities of the empire (now regions of southern Turkey, Syria, Lebanon and Israel) at that time. The corpus of extant Byzantine music in manuscript and printed form is far larger than that of the Gregorian chant, due in part to the fact that neumes fell into disuse in the west after the rise of modern staff notation and with it the new techniques of polyphonic music, while the Eastern tradition of Greek orthodox church music and the reformed neume notation remains alive today. Slavic neume notations ("Znamenny Chant") are on the whole even more difficult to decipher and transcribe than Byzantine or Gregorian neume notations. Western plainchant[edit] "Iubilate deo universa terra" shows psalm verses in unheightened cheironomic neumes. The earliest Western notation for chant appears in the 9th century. These early staffless neumes, called cheironomic or in campo aperto, appeared as freeform wavy lines above the text. Various scholars see these as deriving from cheironomic hand-gestures, from the ekphonetic notation of Byzantine chant, or from punctuation or accent marks.[8] A single neume could represent a single pitch, or a series of pitches all sung on the same syllable. Cheironomic neumes indicated changes in pitch and duration within each syllable, but did not attempt to specify the pitches of individual notes, the intervals between pitches within a neume, nor the relative starting pitches of different syllables' neumes. There is evidence that the earliest Western musical notation, in the form of neumes in campo aperto (without staff-lines), was created at Metz around 800, as a result of Charlemagne's desire for Frankish church musicians to retain the performance nuances used by the Roman singers.[9] Presumably these were intended only as mnemonics for melodies learned by ear. The earliest extant manuscripts (9th–10th centuries) of such neumes include: the abbey of St. Gall, in modern-day Switzerland Messine neumes (from the monastery of Metz in northeast France) Aquitanian neumes (southern France, also used in Spain) Laon, Chartres, Montpellier Digraphic neumes in an 11th-century manuscript from Dijon. Letter names for individual notes in the neume are provided In the early 11th century, Beneventan neumes (from the churches of Benevento in southern Italy) were written at varying distances from the text to indicate the overall shape of the melody; such neumes are called "heightened" or "diastematic" neumes, which showed the relative pitches between neumes. A few manuscripts from the same period use "digraphic" notation in which note names are included below the neumes. Shortly after this, one to four staff lines—an innovation traditionally ascribed to Guido d'Arezzo—clarified the exact relationship between pitches. One line was marked as representing a particular pitch, usually C or F. These neumes resembled the same thin, scripty style of the chironomic notation. By the 11th century, chironomic neumes had evolved into square notation;[10] in Germany, a variant called Gothic neumes continued to be used until the 16th century. This variant is also known as Hufnagel notation, as the used neumes resemble the nails (hufnagels) one uses to attach horseshoes.[11] "Gaudeamus omnes", from the Graduale Aboense, was scripted using square notation. By the 13th century, the neumes of Gregorian chant were usually written in square notation on a staff with four lines and three spaces and a clef marker, as in the 14th–15th century Graduale Aboense shown here. In square notation, small groups of ascending notes on a syllable are shown as stacked squares, read from bottom to top, while descending notes are written with diamonds read from left to right. In melismatic chants, in which a syllable may be sung to a large number of notes, a series of smaller such groups of neumes are written in succession, read from left to right. A special symbol called the custos, placed at the end of a system, showed which pitch came next at the start of the following system. Special neumes such as the oriscus, quilisma, and liquescent neumes, indicate particular vocal treatments for these notes. This system of square notation is standard in modern chantbooks. Solesmes notation[edit] Various manuscripts and printed editions of Gregorian chant, using varying styles of square-note neumes, circulated throughout the Catholic Church for centuries. Some editions added rhythmic patterns, or meter, to the chants. In the 19th century the monks of the Benedictine abbey of Solesmes, particularly Dom Joseph Pothier (1835–1923) and Dom André Mocquereau (1849–1930) collected facsimiles of the earliest manuscripts and published them in a series of 12 publications called Paléographie musicale (French article). They also assembled definitive versions of many of the chants, and developed a standardized form of the square-note notation that was adopted by the Catholic Church and is still in use in publications such as the Liber Usualis (although there are also published editions of this book in modern notation). As a general rule, the notes of a single neume are never sung to more than one syllable; all three pitches of a three-note neume, for example, must all be sung on the same syllable. (This is not universally accepted; Richard Crocker has argued that in the special case of the early Aquitanian polyphony of the St. Martial school, neumes must have been "broken" between syllables to facilitate the coordination of parts.) However, a single syllable may be sung to so many notes that several neumes in succession are used to notate it. The single-note neumes indicate that only a single note corresponds to that syllable. Chants that primarily use single-note neumes are called syllabic; chants with typically one multi-note neume per syllable are called neumatic, and those with many neumes per syllable are called melismatic. Rhythmic interpretation[edit] The Solesmes monks also determined, based on their research, performance practice for Gregorian chant. Because of the ambiguity of medieval musical notation, the question of rhythm in Gregorian chant is contested by scholars. Some neumes, such as the pressus, do indicate the lengthening of notes.[contradictory] Common modern practice, following the Solesmes interpretation, is to perform Gregorian chant with no beat or regular metric accent, in which time is free, allowing the text to determine the accent and the melodic contour to determine phrasing. By the 13th century, with the widespread use of square notation, it is believed that most chant was sung with each note getting approximately an equal value, although Jerome of Moravia cites exceptions in which certain notes, such as the final notes of a chant, are lengthened.[12] The Solesmes school, represented by Dom Pothier and Dom Mocquereau, supports a rhythm of equal values per note, allowing for lengthening and shortening of note values for musical purposes. A second school of thought, including Wagner, Jammers, and Lipphardt, supports different rhythmic realizations of chant by imposing musical meter on the chant in various ways.[13] Musicologist Gustave Reese said that the second group, called mensuralists, "have an impressive amount of historical evidence on their side" (Music in the Middle Ages, p. 146), but the equal-note Solesmes interpretation has permeated the musical world, apparently due to its ease of learning and resonance with modern musical taste.[14] Illustrations[edit] Examples of neumes may be seen here: "Basic & Liquescent Aquitanian Neumes" (archive from 10 June 2006, accessed 12 September 2014), [1], [2]. Clefs[edit] Neumes are written on a four-line staff on the lines and spaces, unlike modern music notation, which uses five lines. Chant does not rely on any absolute pitch or key; the clefs are only to establish the half and whole steps of the solfege or hexachord scale: "ut", "re", "mi", "fa", "sol", "la", "ti", "ut". The clef bracketing a line indicates the location "ut" in the case of the C clef, or "fa" in the case of the F clef as shown: C clef F clef Single notes[edit] Punctum ("point") Virga ("rod") Bipunctum ("two points") The virga and punctum are sung identically. Scholars disagree on whether the bipunctum indicates a note twice as long, or whether the same note should be re-articulated. When this latter interpretation is favoured, it may be called a repercussive neume. Two notes[edit] Clivis ("by slope") Two notes descending Podatus or Pes ("foot") Two notes ascending When two notes are one above the other, as in the podatus, the lower note is always sung first. Three notes[edit] Scandicus Three notes ascending Climacus Three notes descending Torculus down-up-down Porrectus up-down-up The fact that the first two notes of the porrectus are connected as a diagonal rather than as individual notes seems to be a scribe's shortcut. Compound neumes[edit] Several neumes in a row can be juxtaposed for a single syllable, but the following usages have specific names. These are only a few examples. Praepunctis a note appended to the beginning is praepunctis; this example is a podatus pressus because it involves a repeated note Subpunctis One or more notes appended at the end of a neume; this example is a scandicus subbipunctis Other basic markings[edit] Flat Same meaning as modern flat; only occurs on B, and is placed before the entire neume, or group of neumes, rather than immediately before the affected note. Its effect typically lasts the length of a word and is reinserted if needed on the next word. Custos At the end of a staff, the custos indicates what the first note of the next staff will be Mora Like a dot in modern notation, lengthens the preceding note, typically doubling it Interpretive marks[edit] The interpretation of these markings is the subject of great dispute among scholars. Vertical episema (vertical stroke) Indicates a subsidiary accent when there are five or more notes in a neume group. This marking was an invention of the Solemnes interpreters, rather than a marking from the original manuscripts. Horizontal episema (horizontal stroke) Used over a single note or a group of notes (as shown), essentially ignored in the Solesmes interpretation; other scholars treat it as indicating a lengthening or stress on the note(s). Liquescent neume (small note) Can occur on almost any type of neume pointing up or down; usually associated with certain letter combinations such as double consonants, consonant pairs, or diphthongs in the text; usually interpreted as a kind of grace note Quilisma (squiggly note) Always as part of a multi-note neume, usually a climacus, this sign is a matter of great dispute; the Solesmes interpretation is that the preceding note is to be lengthened slightly. Other interpretations of the quilisma: Shake or trill—Prof. William Mahrt of Stanford University supports this interpretation. This interpretation is also put into practice by the Washington Cappella Antiqua, under the current direction of Dr. Patrick Jacobson. Quarter-tone or accidental. The support for this interpretation lies in some early digraphic manuscripts that combine chironomic neumes with letter-names. In places where other manuscripts have quilismas these digraphs often have a strange symbol in place of a letter, suggesting to some scholars the use of a pitch outside the solmization system represented by the letter names.[citation needed] There are other uncommon neume shapes thought to indicate special types of vocal performance, though their precise meaning is a matter of debate:[15] The trigon.[16] The orthodox Solesme interpretation of this obscure three-note neume is a unison plus a third below, but there are other possibilities.[17] It appears to have originated at St. Gall, though it is also widespread in French chant sources from the 10th and 11th centuries.[18] It has been proposed that it may have a microtonal meaning, but there is "an admitted lack of conclusiveness in the arguments in favor of notes smaller than a semitone."[19] The distropha and tristropha are groups of two and three apostrophes, usually of the same pitch. They probably differed from normal repeated notes (virgae or puncta) in the way they were sung. Although there is some doubt on the matter, most modern writers accept Aurelian of Réôme's description of a staccato reiteration.[20] The oriscus is a single-note neume, usually found added as an auxiliary note to another neume. The name may derive from either the Greek horos (limit) or ōriskos (little hill). Its intended manner of performance is not clear. Although a microtonal interpretation has been suggested, there is possible contradicting evidence in the Dijon tonary, Montpellier H. 159.[21] The pressus is a compound neume, usually involving an initial neume followed by an oriscus and a punctum. The initial neume may be a virga (in which case the virga + oriscus may be together called a virga strata), in which case the pressus indicates three notes; if the initial neume is a pes, then the compound indicates a four-note group. Just as with the oriscus itself, the interpretation is unsure. When chant came to be notated on a staff, the oriscus was normally represented as having the same pitch as the immediately preceding note.[22] There are also litterae significativae in many manuscripts, usually interpreted to indicate variations in tempo, e.g. c = celeriter (fast), t = tenete (hold) (an early form of the tenuto), a = auge (lengthen, as in a tie). The Solesmes editions omit all such letters. Other functions[edit] Neumes were used for notating other kinds of melody than plainchant, including troubadour and trouvère melodies, monophonic versus and conductus, and the individual lines of polyphonic songs. In some traditions, such as the Notre Dame school of polyphony, certain patterns of neumes were used to represent particular rhythmic patterns called rhythmic modes. Other types[edit] Ekphonetic neumes annotating the melodic recitation of (Christian) holy scriptures. Neumes of Byzantine music – in several stages, old Byzantine, middle Byzantine, late Byzantine and post-Byzantine, and neo-Byzantine (reformed). Neumes of Slavic chant (Slavic neumes). Mozarabic or Hispanic neumes (Spain), also called Visigothic script. These neumes have not been deciphered, but the Mozarabic liturgy varies somewhat from the Roman rite. Catalan notation.[23] Daseian notation – an early form of Western music notation used in 9th and 10th-century music theory treatises. Buddhist chant uses a type of neume. Digital notation[edit] Because notation software usually focuses on modern European music notation, software that allows the user to use neumes is rare. Gregorio is a software especially written for that purpose. With its own GABC-Syntax and together with LuaTeX it provides high quality output of square notation neumes and also St. Gall neumes. Finale can be enhanced with Medieval 2, a third-party package devoted to early music and especially neumes.[24][25] Lilypond is able to produce output using neumes.[26] Some open fonts[27][28] for neumes are available, which can be used by common office software or scorewriters. See also[edit] Mensural notation Musical notation Znamenny Chant Notes[edit] ^ Dom Gregory Sunol, Textbook of Gregorian Chant According to the Solesmes Method, 2003, ISBN 0-7661-7241-4, ISBN 978-0-7661-7241-8. ^ Chants of the Church ^ Liber Usualis ^ "neume". Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press.  (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) ^ πνεῦμα, νεῦμα. Liddell, Henry George; Scott, Robert; A Greek–English Lexicon at the Perseus Project. ^ "neume". Oxford English Dictionary (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. 1989. ^ One of the earliest examples is the Planctus de obitu Karoli (c.814), which was provided neumatic notation in the 10th century, cf. Rosamond McKitterick (2008), Charlemagne: The Formation of a European Identity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-88672-4), 225 n54. For the lyrics, see Peter Godman (1985), Latin Poetry of the Carolingian Renaissance (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press), 206–11. ^ Kenneth levy, "Plainchant", Grove Music Online, edited by Laura Macy (Accessed January 20, 2006), (subscription access) ^ James Grier Ademar de Chabannes, Carolingian Musical Practices, and "Nota Romana", Journal of the American Musicological Society, Vol. 56, No. 1 (Spring, 2003), pp. 43–98, retrieved July 2007 ^ "Gregorian Chant - Classical Music". sites.google.com. ^ David Hiley. "Hufnagel". Oxford Music Online. Oxford University. Retrieved 5 February 2015. ^ Hiley, "Chant", p. 44. "The performance of chant in equal note lengths from the 13th century onwards is well supported by contemporary statements." ^ Apel, Gregorian Chant, p. 127. ^ Mahrt "Chant,", p. 18. ^ Don Michael Randel (ed.). 2003. "Neume". Harvard Dictionary of Music, fourth edition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ISBN 0-674-01163-5. ^ Willi Apel, ed. (1972). "Neume". Harvard Dictionary of Music, 2nd ed. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. p. 572. ^ David Hughes, "The Musical Text of the Introit Ressurexi", in Music in Medieval Europe: Studies in Honour of Bryan Gillingham, edited by Terence Bailey and Alma Colk Santosuosso, 163–80 (Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate Publishing, 2007), p. 170. ISBN 978-0-7546-5239-7. ^ David Hughes, "An Enigmatic Neume", in Themes and Variations: Writings on Music in Honor of Rulan Chao Pian, edited by Bell Yung and Joseph S. C. Lam, 8–30 (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press; Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press Press, 1994), pp. 13–14. ^ David Hughes, "An Enigmatic Neume", in Themes and Variations: Writings on Music in Honor of Rulan Chao Pian, edited by Bell Yung and Joseph S. C. Lam, 8–30 (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press; Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press Press, 1994), p. 26. ^ David Hiley, "Distropha, tristropha [double apostrophe, bistropha; triple apostrophe]", The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, second edition, edited by Stanley Sadie and John Tyrrell (London: Macmillan Publishers, 2001). ^ Anon., "Oriscus", The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, second edition, edited by Stanley Sadie and John Tyrrell (London: Macmillan Publishers, 2001). ^ David Hiley, "Pressus", The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, second edition, edited by Stanley Sadie and John Tyrrell (London: Macmillan Publishers, 2001). ^ Garrigosa i Massana, Joaquim (2003). Els manuscrits musicals a Catalunya fins al segle XIII. Lleida: Institut d'Estudis Ilerdencs. ISBN 9788489943742. ^ "Medieval 2 release". MakeMusic. Retrieved 2017-06-17. ^ "Medieval 2 website". Klemm Music Technology (for Robert Piéchaud). Retrieved 2017-06-17. ^ "Lilypond Notation Reference – Typesetting Gregorian Chant". Lilypond Development Team. Retrieved 2016-08-12. ^ "CaeciliaeCaeciliae". Marello.org. Archived from the original on 2016-10-31. Retrieved 2017-08-28.CS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown (link) ^ "Liturgical Music / Downloads". Monastery Saint Meinrad Archabbey. Retrieved 2016-08-12. References[edit] Graduale triplex (1979). Tournai: Desclée & Socii. ISBN 2-85274-094-X, a special edition of the Graduale Romanum with chant notation in three forms, one above the other, for easy comparison: Laon, St. Gall, and square note Liber usualis (1953). Tournai: Desclée & Socii. Paléographie musicale.[full citation needed] ISBN 2-85274-219-5. Facsimiles of early adiastamatic chant manuscripts. Apel, Willi (1990). Gregorian Chant. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. ISBN 0-253-20601-4. Constantin, Floros. "Universale Neumenkunde" (Universal Theory of Neumes); three-volume[full citation needed] covering all major styles and schools of neumatic musical notation in three major divisions: Byzantine, Gregorian and Slavic. Hiley, David (1990). "Chant". In Performance Practice: Music before 1600, Howard Mayer Brown and Stanley Sadie, eds., pp. 37–54. New York: W.W. Norton & Co. ISBN 0-393-02807-0. Hiley, David (1995). Western Plainchant: A Handbook. Cambridge and New York: Clarendon Press and Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-19-816572-2. Mahrt, William P. (2000). "Chant". In A Performer's Guide to Medieval Music, Ross Duffin, ed., pp. 1–22. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. ISBN 0-253-33752-6. McKinnon, James, ed. (1990). Antiquity and the Middle Ages. Prentice Hall. ISBN 0-13-036153-4.CS1 maint: extra text: authors list (link) Wagner, Peter. (1911) Einführung in die Gregorianischen Melodien. Ein Handbuch der Choralwissenschaft. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel. Wilson, David (1990). Music of the Middle Ages. Schirmer Books. ISBN 0-02-872951-X. External links[edit] Learning Resources The 1961 Liber Usualis compares, inter alia, modern and chant notations. It is also a handy reference for all the types of neumes. Singing Gregorian Chant: Pitch and Mode Other Oliver Gerlach (Ensemble Ison): Performing Western Plainchant—Introduction into the Latin Neumes of the 10th century (Accessed November 26, 2009) David Hiley and Janka Szendrei: "Notation", Grove Music Online, ed. L. Macy (Accessed June 12, 2006), (subscription access) Font package for writing post-Byzantine neumes Kenneth Levy: "Plainchant", Grove Music Online, ed. L. Macy (Accessed January 20, 2006), (subscription access) Comparative table of cheironomic and square neumes Samples of early notation, showing the same chant in many different notations Catholic Encyclopedia entry for Neum Solesmes Abbey The Intonation of the Eight Tones Byzantine notation Music for Vespers Byzantine notation v t e Musical notation Staff 8va 15ma Abbreviation Bar / barline / measure Clef Da capo Dal segno Key signature Ledger line Mode Ossia Scale Rehearsal letter Repeat sign Tempo Time signature Transposition Transposing instrument Musical notes Accidental (flat natural sharp) Cue note Dotted note Grace note Note value (beam notehead stem) Pitch Rest Tacet Tuplet Tremolo Interval Helmholtz pitch notation Letter notation Scientific pitch notation Articulation Accent Sforzando Caesura Damping Dynamics Fermata Fingering Legato Marcato Ornament (appoggiatura glissando grace note mordent slide trill) Portato Slur Staccato Tenuto Tie Tonguing Sheet music History of music publishing Music engraving Popular-music publisher Sheet-music publisher Scorewriter Alternative Braille music Chord chart Figured bass Graphic notation Lead sheet Eye music Nashville Number System Numbered musical notation Klavarskribo Tablature ("Tab") Parsons Percussion notation Simplified Non-Western and ancient Ancient Greek Chinese Kepatihan Kunkunshi Neume Swaralipi Shakuhachi Znamenny Related Mensural notation Music stand Sight-reading Sight singing Transcription List of musical symbols Category:Musical notation Authority control BNF: cb11977807m (data) GND: 4171568-8 LCCN: sh85091086 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Neume&oldid=995906801" Categories: Christian music Musical notation Hidden categories: Articles containing Ancient Greek (to 1453)-language text CS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from March 2015 All self-contradictory articles Articles with unsourced statements from January 2015 All articles with incomplete citations Articles with incomplete citations from January 2015 CS1 maint: extra text: authors list Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Languages Български Bosanski Català Čeština Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto فارسی Français Հայերեն Italiano עברית Lietuvių Magyar Македонски Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Norsk nynorsk Occitan Polski Português Română Русский Simple English Српски / srpski Suomi Svenska Українська 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 23 December 2020, at 14:43 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-245 ---- Category:Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers - Wikipedia Help Category:Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search This category is for articles with BNE identifiers. Please do not add subcategories. For more information, see Wikipedia:Authority control. Administrators: Please do not delete this category even if it is empty! This category may be empty occasionally or even most of the time. This is a maintenance category, used for maintenance of the Wikipedia project. It is not part of the encyclopedia and contains non-article pages, or groups articles by status rather than subject. Do not include this category in content categories. This is a tracking category. It builds and maintains a list of pages primarily for the sake of the list itself. They are not part of the encyclopedia's categorization scheme. This category is hidden on its member pages—unless the corresponding user preference (appearance → show hidden categories) is set. These categories are used to track, build and organize lists of pages needing "attention en masse" (for example, pages using deprecated syntax), or that may need to be edited at someone's earliest convenience. These categories also serve to aggregate members of several lists or sub-categories into a larger, more efficient list (discriminated by classifications). Contents: Top 0–9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z * # 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 • A Aa Ae Aj Ao At • B Ba Be Bj Bo Bt • C Ca Ce Cj Co Ct • D Da De Dj Do Dt • E Ea Ee Ej Eo Et • F Fa Fe Fj Fo Ft • G Ga Ge Gj Go Gt • H Ha He Hj Ho Ht • I Ia Ie Ij Io It • J Ja Je Jj Jo Jt • K Ka Ke Kj Ko Kt • L La Le Lj Lo Lt • M Ma Me Mj Mo Mt • N Na Ne Nj No Nt • O Oa Oe Oj Oo Ot • P Pa Pe Pj Po Pt • Q Qa Qe Qj Qo Qt • R Ra Re Rj Ro Rt • S Sa Se Sj So St • T Ta Te Tj To Tt • U Ua Ue Uj Uo Ut • V Va Ve Vj Vo Vt • W Wa We Wj Wo Wt • X Xa Xe Xj Xo Xt • Y Ya Ye Yj Yo Yt • Z Za Ze Zj Zo Zt Pages in this category should only be added by Module:Authority control. Pages in category "Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers" The following 200 pages are in this category, out of approximately 84,678 total. This list may not reflect recent changes (learn more). (previous page) (next page), Yusaku Kamekura 0–9 2 Fast 2 Furious 3 Hürel 12 Angry Men (1957 film) The 12 Cellists of the Berlin Philharmonic 12 Monkeys 19th century The 39 Steps (1935 film) 50 Cent The 400 Blows 1941 (film) 2001: A Space Odyssey (film) 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea (1916 film) A A Barcala A Capela A Coruña (comarca) A Estrada A Fonsagrada A Lama Pieter van der Aa AABB Asger Aaboe Aachen RWTH Aachen University Hans von Aachen Jacob Aagaard David Aaker Kim Fupz Aakeson Aaliyah Aalst, North Brabant Aino Aalto Alvar Aalto William Aalto Angela Aames Aaron Aaron ben Moses ben Asher Jane Aaron Jason Aaron Lee Aaron Richard Aaron Ben Aaronovitch Irving Aaronson Espen Aarseth Hans Aarsleff Hans Aarsman John Aasen Juhan Aavik Ab Urbe Condita Libri Joseph Abaco Diego Abad de Santillán Manuel Abad y Lasierra Manuel Abad y Queipo Alejandro Abad Antoni Abad Diego José Abad Iñaki Abad Mercedes Abad Ramon d'Abadal i de Vinyals Reyes Abades Guillermo Abadía Morales Alberto Abadie Paul Abadie Magdalena Abakanowicz Julio Abalde Leonid Abalkin Iñaki Ábalos Rafael Ábalos Claro Abánades López François-Jean Willemain d'Abancourt Abanilla Luis Abanto Morales ABAP Ana Francisca Abarca de Bolea Pedro Pablo Abarca de Bolea, 10th Count of Aranda Joaquín Abarca Pedro Abarca Eduardo Abaroa (artist) José Fernando de Abascal y Sousa Alejandro Abascal Amelia Abascal Santiago Abascal Silvia Abascal Dodo Abashidze Sait Faik Abasıyanık Diego Abatantuono Marco Abate Annibale degli Abati Olivieri Joaquín Abati Gustav Abb Giuseppe Cesare Abba Fray Íñigo Abbad y Lasierra Mostafa El-Abbadi Antoine Thomson d'Abbadie Arnaud-Michel d'Abbadie Claudio Abbado Nicola Abbagnano Eleonora Abbagnato Abbas (photographer) Ihsan Abbas Hiam Abbass Allison Abbate Florencia Abbate Janet Abbate Lirio Abbate Giuseppe Abbati Hendrik Abbé James Abbe Abbey Abbey of Santo Domingo de Silos Edward Abbey Edwin Austin Abbey Henry Abbey Abbo Cernuus Abiel Abbot Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein Berenice Abbott Bruce Abbott Bud Abbott Chris Abbott Edwin Abbott Abbott Evelyn Abbott George Abbott Jack Abbott (author) Jacob Abbott Jennifer Abbott John Stevens Cabot Abbott Megan Abbott Paul Abbott R. Tucker Abbott Rachel Abbott Scott Abbott (screenwriter) Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab Abd-al-Baqi al-Zurqani 'Abd al-Ilah Mustafa 'Abd al-Raziq Khalid Abdalla Abdallah ibn Buluggin Jean Mohamed Ben Abdeljlil Salah Abdel Sabour Anouar Abdel-Malek Emir Abdelkader Abd el-Krim Abdelwahab Bouhdiba Emil Abderhalden Adel Abdessemed Barkhad Abdi Kader Abdolah Abdomen Ildar Abdrazakov Muhammad Abduh Ahmad Sarji Abdul Hamid ʻAbdu'l-Bahá Kareem Abdul-Jabbar Lida Abdul Abdulaziz Abdullah II of Jordan Achmed Abdullah Reem Abdullah Aleksandr Abdulov Kōbō Abe George Abe Hiroshi Abe (actor) Shana Abé Tsuyoshi Abe Yoshitoshi ABe Éliette Abécassis Valentin Abecia Gilbert Abbott à Beckett Martin Abegg James Abegglen Abel, King of Denmark Alfred Abel Carl Friedrich Abel David Abel (cinematographer) Félix-Marie Abel Clamor Heinrich Abel Jake Abel Jessica Abel Niels Henrik Abel Othenio Abel Robert Abel (animator) Walter Abel Deborah Abela Eduardo Abela Peter Abelard Johann Philipp Abelin Alistair Abell David Charles Abell Kjeld Abell Margarita Abella Caprile Fermín Abella y Blave Joan Abellan i Mula Raymond Abellio Montserrat Abelló i Soler Abelló Museum Juan Abelló Louis Abelly Richard Abels Hal Abelson Philip Abelson (previous page) (next page) Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Wikipedia_articles_with_BNE_identifiers&oldid=846549417" Categories: Pages with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with authority control information Hidden categories: Hidden categories Tracking categories Template Large category TOC via CatAutoTOC on category with over 20,000 pages CatAutoTOC generates Large category TOC Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Category Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Afrikaans Asturianu भोजपुरी Български Español Euskara 한국어 Ilokano עברית Bahasa Melayu 日本語 Português Română Scots Slovenščina Suomi Türkçe 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 19 June 2018, at 12:53 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2460 ---- Help:Category - Wikipedia Help:Category From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search For guidelines on the use of categories in Wikipedia, see Wikipedia:Categorization. For a basic readers' guide see Help:Categories. For quick answers, see the readers' FAQ or the editors' FAQ on categories. For a list of categories, see Special:Categories. Wikipedia information page This is an information page. It is not one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, but rather intends to describe some aspect(s) of Wikipedia's norms, customs, technicalities, or practices. It may reflect varying levels of consensus and vetting. Shortcut H:CAT Wikipedia data structure Namespaces Subject namespaces Talk namespaces 0 (Main/Article) Talk 1 2 User User talk 3 4 Wikipedia Wikipedia talk 5 6 File File talk 7 8 MediaWiki MediaWiki talk 9 10 Template Template talk 11 12 Help Help talk 13 14 Category Category talk 15 100 Portal Portal talk 101 118 Draft Draft talk 119 710 TimedText TimedText talk 711 828 Module Module talk 829 Currently unused 108 Book Book talk 109 446 Education Program Education Program talk 447 2300 Gadget Gadget talk 2301 2302 Gadget definition Gadget definition talk 2303 Virtual namespaces -1 Special -2 Media Categories are intended to group together pages on similar subjects. They are implemented by a MediaWiki feature that adds any page with a text like [[Category:XYZ]] in its wikimarkup to the automated listing that is the category with name XYZ. Categories help readers to find, and navigate around, a subject area, to see pages sorted by title, and to thus find article relationships. Categories are normally found at the bottom of an article page. Clicking a category name brings up a category page listing the articles (or other pages) that have been added to that particular category. There may also be a section listing the subcategories of that category. The subcategorization feature makes it possible to organize categories into tree-like structures to aid navigation. The term category does refer to both the title of a category page—the category pagename—and the category itself. Keeping this in mind while reading about categorization, plus learning a category page layout is a worthwhile investment in research techniques. (See also the search box parameter "incategory".) The layout of a category page is mostly text, but see about displaying category trees below. Contents 1 Summary 2 Category page definition 2.1 Putting pages into categories 3 Working with category pages 3.1 Linking to category pages 3.2 Retrieving raw category information 3.3 Sorting category pages 3.3.1 Default sort key 3.4 Searching for pages in categories 3.5 Listing all categories 3.6 Displaying category trees and page counts 3.7 Moving and redirecting category pages 3.8 Hiding categories 4 Finding articles for a category 5 Categorizing 5.1 Categorizing templates 5.2 Categories and templates 5.3 Categorizing redirect pages 5.4 "Related Changes" with categories 5.5 Watching category additions and removals 6 See also 7 Notes Summary The MediaWiki software maintains tables of categories, to which any editable page can be added. To add a page to a category, include "[[Category:Category name]]" or "[[Category:Category name|Sortkey]]" in that page's wikimarkup. The categories to which a page belongs appear in a box at the bottom of the page. A category is usually associated with a category page in the "Category:" namespace.[1] A category page contains text that can be edited, like any other page, but when the page is displayed, the last part of what is displayed is an automatically generated list of all pages in that category, in the form of links. Other category pages which appear in this list are treated separately, as subcategories. The bottom of a Wikipedia article on Chicken eyeglasses. At the very bottom of the page, below the References, navigation templates and external links are a series of links. These links are the categories used on the page, which include: Category:Animal Welfare, Category:Animal equipment, Category:Eyewear, and Category:Poultry farming . By clicking on the category link at the bottom of the page, readers can navigate the Category tree. Category page definition A category page is any page in the Category namespace. They each act as a category, and are termed a "category". The category page has one section titled Subcategories listing other "categories", and one section titled Pages, listing pages as categorized (in other namespaces). New categories are created by creating a page in the Category namespace. A category page can be edited like any other page. However, when it is displayed, the editable part of the page is followed by automatically generated lists of pages belonging to the category, as follows: First a count and list of subcategories (other category pages belonging to the category) is shown, if any exist. The name of each subcategory is followed by counts like "(6 C, 38 P, 2 F)", meaning this subcategory contains 6 subcategories, 38 pages, and 2 files. Counts of 0 are omitted. The further subcategories are expanded in the display if the ► sign alongside the subcategory is clicked (but this "widget" is only visible if your browser has JavaScript enabled). Note: ► is shown if there are no further subcategories. The subcategory is collapsed again if ▼ is clicked. Next a count and list of pages in the category (excluding subcategories and images) is shown. If the category has no members, a message to that effect is displayed. Next a count and list of image and other media files in the category appears, if any exist. These are shown with thumbnails. The first 20 characters of the file name are shown, with an ellipsis if that is not the full name; also the file size is shown. The items in the lists all link to the pages concerned; in the case of the images this applies both to the image itself and to the text below it (the name of the image). For the way in which the lists are ordered, see Sorting category pages below. The first and second lists are divided into sections, according to the first character of the sort key. These initial characters are displayed above the sections. To suppress these, make all sort keys start with a space. A category page can only display a limited number of items (currently 200). If more pages belong to the category, there will be a link to the next ones. The categories box for the category page appears at the bottom, in the same place as for other pages. This contains the categories to which the current category page has been added, i.e. its parent categories (the categories of which it is a subcategory). Add a category page to other categories in the normal way, using the "[[Category:Category name]]" or "[[Category:Category name|Sortkey]]" syntax. Putting pages into categories Shortcut WP:PAGECAT A page belongs to a category if the page's wikimarkup contains a declaration for that category. A category declaration takes the form [[Category:Category name]] or [[Category:Category name|Sortkey]]. The declaration must be processed, i.e. it will not work if it appears between ... or ... tags, or in a comment. The declaration may however come from a transcluded page; see Categories and templates below. A category name can be any string that would be a legitimate page title. If the category name begins with a lower-case letter it will be capitalized. In Wikipedia, it is customary to place category declarations at the end of the wikimarkup, but before any stub templates (which themselves transclude categories) and interlanguage links. When a page has been added to one or more categories, a categories box appears at the bottom of the page (or possibly elsewhere, if a non-default skin is being used). This box contains a list of the categories the page belongs to, in the order in which the category declarations appear in the processed wikimarkup. The category names are linked to the corresponding category pages. They appear as redlinks if the corresponding category page does not exist. If a user has enabled the HotCat gadget, the categories box will also provide links to quickly add, remove, or modify category declarations on the page, without having to edit the whole page. Hidden categories are not displayed, except as described below under Hiding categories. Working with category pages The following subsections are ordered from simple actions to more elaborate or rarer actions. Linking to category pages To link to a category page without putting the current page in that category, precede the link with a colon: [[:Category:Category name]]. Such a link can be piped like a normal wikilink. (The {{cl}} template, and others listed on its documentation page, may sometimes be helpful.) Retrieving raw category information Raw information about the members of a category, their sortkeys and timestamps (time when last added to the category) can be obtained from the API, using a query of the form: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/api.php?cmtitle=Category:Category_name&action=query&list=categorymembers&cmlimit=500&cmprop=title|sortkey|timestamp Listings of up to 500 members are possible. If there are more members then the results will include text near the end like this: . This can be added to the previous one, without quotation marks, for the next page of members: ...&cmcontinue=page|NNNN|TITLE Sorting category pages See also: Help:Sorting Shortcut WP:SORTCAT By default, a page is sorted under the first character of its name, without the namespace. English Wikipedia groups accented characters together with their unaccented version, so pages starting with À, Á, Ä, will be listed under heading A. Sorting is case-insensitive, so "ABC" comes after "Abacus". Unlike at Special:Allpages and Special:Prefixindex, a space is treated as a space (coming before all other characters), not as an underscore. The English Wikipedia has numerical sorting in categories. This means a page whose title begins with a number will be sorted according to the numeric value of the number (even if it is multiple digits). Thus "9 dogs", "25 dogs", and "112 dogs" will all appear under the "0–9" heading in numeric order. If the number includes a comma, space, or period, the sorting algorithm will only consider the part of the number before the separator. Each of the three lists (subcategories, pages, media files) is arranged in the order explained above (except that, in the subcategories list, the namespace indicator "Category:" is not considered). If an item ought to be positioned within a list on the basis of an alternative name (sort key) for that item, then this can be specified in the category tag that places the item in the list: [[Category:Category name|Sortkey]] For example, to add an article called Albert Einstein to the category "People" and have the article sorted by "Einstein, Albert", you would type: [[Category:People|Einstein, Albert]] Unlike a piped link (which uses the same syntax), the sort key itself is not displayed to readers. It affects only the order in which pages are listed on the category page. It is useful to document the system being used for sort keys on the category page. For guidelines about the use of sort keys on Wikipedia, see WP:SORTKEY. Default sort key Shortcut WP:DEFAULTSORT See also: WP:NAMESORT and WP:SORTKEY It is possible to set a default sort key which is different from {{PAGENAME}} by using the magic word {{DEFAULTSORT}}: {{DEFAULTSORT:new key}} In the case of multiple default sort key tags, the last DEFAULTSORT on the final rendering of a page applies for all categories, regardless of the position of the category tags. This also means that a DEFAULTSORT tag included from a template is not effective if another DEFAULTSORT tag occurs later on the page, even if the later DEFAULTSORT tag is also "hidden" (included by another template). Searching for pages in categories Further information: Help:Searching § Syntax See also: § Searching for articles in categories, Wikipedia:Category intersection, and Wikimedia bug T3497 "Hierarchical category system is urgently needed" In addition to browsing through hierarchies of categories, it is possible to use the search tool to find specific articles in specific categories. To search for articles in a specific category, type incategory:"CategoryName" in the search box. An "OR" can be added to join the contents of one category with the contents of another. For example, enter incategory:"Suspension bridges" OR incategory:"Bridges in New York City" to return all pages that belong to either (or both) of the categories, as here. Note that using search to find categories will not find articles which have been categorized using templates. This feature also doesn't return pages in subcategories. Listing all categories Special:Categories provides an alphabetic list of all categories, with the number of members of each; this number does not include the content of the subcategories, but it includes the subcategories themselves, i.e., each counting as one. The above list contains all categories that have members, regardless of whether they have corresponding category pages. To list all existing category pages (regardless of whether they have members), use Special:AllPages/Category:. Displaying category trees and page counts As described at mw:Help:Magic words, {{PAGESINCATEGORY:Example}} or {{PAGESINCAT:Example}} returns the number of pages in "Category:Example". Each subcategory counts as one page; pages in subcategories are not counted. The page Special:CategoryTree enables you to see the tree structure of a category (its subcategories, their subcategories and so on; the display of files and other member pages is optional). The CategoryTree extension can be used to display such a tree on any page. (This is sometimes done on the category page itself, if the category is split over multiple screens, to make all subcategories available on every screen.) The basic syntax is Category name to display just the subcategory tree, and Category name to display member pages as well. They will be indicated by italics. Dapete's category-visualizer vCat will render charts of the tree structure. You may also use Template:Category tree or Template:Category tree all, instead. Warning: The following code {{PAGESINCATEGORY:{{PAGENAME}}}} will not work as expected when used in the wikitext or in a transcluded template in a category page whose title contains some ASCII punctuations. For legacy reasons, {{PAGENAME}} may return the page name with these characters being HTML-encoded using numeric character entities : this still works for generating derived wikilinks or displaying page names, or when HTML-encoded this page name is used in a conditional "#switch", but PAGESINCATEGORY does not recognize the category name given in parameter if some characters are HTML-encoded (this is the case notably when the category name contains ASCII apostrophes ' and a few other ASCII punctuations. (The same HTML-encoding is also applied to the values returned by {{FULLPAGENAME}}, {{SUBPAGENAME}}, or {{NAMESPACE}}). In that case, as the category is not found by its HTML-encoded pagename, PAGESINCATEGORY will unexpectedly return 0 and not its effective number of member pages. A simple workaround is to transform these HTML-encoded characters back into standard UTF-8-encoded characters, by using the {{titleparts:}} parser function, like this: {{PAGESINCATEGORY:{{titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}}}}} Moving and redirecting category pages Categories can be moved in the same way as an ordinary page; but a certain amount of cleanup may be necessary. A redirect is left at the old category name, and this is not a normal #REDIRECT [[...]] but a {{category redirect}}. Once all the pages have been moved out of the old category, it may be left as a category redirect or deleted. For categories entirely populated through templates (see above), modifying the templates enables all affected articles to be moved to another category, but with the refresh problem mentioned. Almost all category name changes are made pursuant to a consensus decision at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion. Do not create intercategory redirects other than with a {{category redirect}} template. See Wikipedia:Categories for discussion#Redirecting categories for more on category redirects. Hiding categories When the magic word __HIDDENCAT__ is placed on a category page, that category becomes hidden, meaning that it will not be displayed on the pages belonging to that category. On Wikipedia, the magic word is not normally used explicitly, but is applied through the {{hidden category}} template. The feature is mostly used to prevent project maintenance categories from showing up to ordinary readers on article pages. However, hidden categories are displayed (although listed as hidden): on category pages (whether as parent categories or subcategories); at preview during editing; if the user has selected "Show hidden categories" in user preferences. Hidden categories are automatically added to Category:Hidden categories. For guidelines on the hiding of categories on Wikipedia, see WP:HIDDENCAT. Finding articles for a category The most effective way of finding entries of a category is using the "What links here" tool on the category's main article. An easy way to find relevant articles for a new category or missing entries in an existing one is by finding the most relevant list and checking its entries. Sometimes categories are about things that are intersections of other categories for which the PetScan tool can be used. More relevant articles may also be found linked in a category's main article and the articles already featured in the category − especially in their "See also" sections (if existent) and the automatically suggested "RELATED ARTICLES" below them. Furthermore, a category's superordinate categories often feature articles that should be subcategorized to the category. Other ways to find relevant articles include searching Wikipedia for the category's topic and searching the Web for the topic in quotes " (with synonyms also in quotes and appended after an OR) and appending the word wiki or Wikipedia or site:Wikipedia.org to them. Categorizing Main page: Wikipedia:Categorization Categorizing templates Templates are categorized the same way as articles, except that [[Category: Some-topic templates]] should be placed on the template's documentation page (or inside ... tags, if there is no documentation page), this is necessary to avoid categorizing pages by template inclusion (see below). Categories and templates A template can be used to add pages to a category, usually by placing the category link inside tags on the template (e.g. [[Category:category name]]). When the template is transcluded into the page, the category link becomes active, and the page is added to the category page. This is useful for categories that have high turnover or many pages included, like cleanup categories. Changes to the template, however, may not be reflected immediately on the category page. When you edit an article to add a category tag directly, the list of category members is updated immediately when the page is saved. When a category link is contained in a template, however, this does not happen immediately: instead, whenever a template is edited, all the pages that transclude it are put into the job queue to be recached during periods of low server load. This means that, in busy periods, it may take hours or even days before individual pages are recached and they start to appear in the category list. Performing a null edit to a page will allow it to jump the queue and be immediately recached. To add the template itself to the category page as well, omit the "includeonly" tags. To add the template to a category without categorizing pages on which the template is transcluded, place the category declaration between ... tags, or add it to the template documentation page between (the latter allows recategorizing the template without editing it, which is helpful if it is protected, or so complicated that mere mortals hesitate to touch it). Parser functions can be used to make the transcluded categories, or the sort key used in them, dependent on other variables, notably PAGENAME. Passing a category name as a parameter [[Category:{{{cat|default}}}]] or {{{cat|[[Category:default]]}}} If the user provides a parameter 'cat=XXX' the page will be categorized at the page [[Category:XXX]], otherwise it will be categorized at the page [[Category:default]]. Calling the template with "cat=" (equal to nothing) disables putting the page in any category. Excluding non-article pages {{#if:{{NAMESPACE}} | | [[Category:XXX]]}} the variable NAMESPACE is null for mainspace articles. For any space other than mainspace, this ParserFunction will produce an empty string, but for regular articles this will include the article in Category:XXX. On Wikipedia it is not recommended that templates be used to populate ordinary content categories of articles. See Categorization using templates in the categorization guideline. Categorizing redirect pages Main page: Wikipedia:Categorizing redirects Redirect pages can be categorized and there are conventions how to do it. The redirect link must be first on the page. On a category page, redirects are listed in italics. "Related Changes" with categories For a category, the "Related Changes" feature, when applied to the corresponding category page, lists recent changes to the pages which are currently listed as belonging to a category. Where those pages are subcategories or image pages, only changes to their editable parts are listed. Notice that "Related Changes" does not show edits to pages that have been removed from the category. Also, "Related Changes" does not list recent changes to pages linked from the editable part of the category page (as it would normally, with a non-category page). If a workaround would be required, the links in question could be placed in a template and transcluded onto the category page. As usual – unlike with watchlists – recent changes to corresponding talk pages are not shown under "Related Changes". Pages one is watching are bolded on the list. This can help to find which pages in a given category one has on one's watchlist. The DynamicPageList (third-party) extension provides a list of last edits to the pages in a category, or optionally, just the list of pages; the simpler DynamicPageList (Wikimedia) is installed on Meta, Wikinews, Wikibooks and Wikiversity; the extension mw:Extension:DPLforum is installed on Wikia. Watching category additions and removals Since 2016, additions and removals from categories are available via the "Category changes" filter on recent changes pages, including watchlists and Special:RecentChangesLinked. For example, category changes to articles in Category:Cannabis stubs can be found here. You can monitor additions and removals from specific categories by adding the categories to your watchlist and making sure the "Category changes" filter is active. You can view changes to categories in your watchlist by clicking here. Additional scripts with similar functionality are User:CategoryWatchlistBot and User:Ais523/catwatch. See also MW:Help:Categories {{Category TOC}} Wikipedia:FAQ/Categorization Wikipedia:WikiProject Categories Wikipedia:Quick cat index Notes ^ The category itself is permanently created as soon as it has been saved on to any page. Unless you create a category page, it will display as a red link. Unless you add another category to the category page, it will not be placed in the category tree. Category pages are created like any other page. Most commonly, editors click on the redlink in an article and create the category page that way. Wikipedia help pages Visit the Teahouse or the Help desk for an interactive Q & A forum. FAQs (?) Reference desks (?) Noticeboards (?) Cheatsheet (?) Directories (?) About Wikipedia (?) Administration Purpose Principles Policies and guidelines What Wikipedia is not Disclaimer (parental advice) Making requests Who writes Wikipedia? Help for readers (?) FAQ Books Copyright Glossary Mobile access Navigation Other languages Searching Students Viewing media Contributing to Wikipedia (?) Advice for young editors Avoiding common mistakes Etiquette Simplified Manual of Style Simplified rule-set "Ignore all rules" "The rules are principles" Style-tips Tip of the day Your first article (article wizard) Getting started (?) Why create an account? Introductions by topic The Wikipedia Adventure Graphics tutorials Picture tutorial IRC (live chat) tutorial VisualEditor user guide Dos and don'ts (?) Accessibility Biographies Biographies (living) Categorization Consensus Discussions Disambiguation Images Leads Links Lists References Tables Titles (of articles) How-to pages and information pages (?) Appealing blocks Article deletion Categories Citations/references Referencing for beginners Citation Style 1 Cite errors References and page numbers Convert Diff Editing Minor edit toolbar edit conflict Find sources Files Footnotes Image deletion Infoboxes Linking (link color) Logging in Merging Page name Renaming pages Redirect Passwords Email confirmation Reverting Simple vandalism cleanup Talk pages (archiving) User contributions Coding (?) Wiki markup Barcharts Calculations Characters Columns Hidden text HTML Lists Magic words Music symbols Sections Sounds Tables Templates Transclusion URL Visual files Directories (?) Abbreviations Contents (Encyclopedia proper) Departments Editor's index Essays FAQs Glossary Guidelines Manual of Style Policies Tasks Tips Tools Missing Manual Ask for help on your talk page (?) v t e Wikipedia technical help Get personal technical help at the Teahouse, Help desk, Village pump (technical), talk pages or IRC. General technical help Browser notes Bypass cache Keyboard shortcuts Troubleshooting Editing CharInsert Edit conflict Edit toolbar Reverting How to create a page IRC Tutorial Mobile access Multilingual support Page history Page information Page name Help Printing Software notices Editnotice Special Characters Entering User access levels VisualEditor User guide Special page-related Special page help Edit filter Emailing users Logging in Reset passwords Logs Moving a page Fixing cut-and-paste moves Notifications/Echo FAQ Page Curation Page import Pending changes Random pages Recent changes Related changes Searching Linksearch Tags User contributions Watchlist What links here Wikitext Wikitext Cheatsheet Columns Line-break handling Lists Magic words For beginners Conditional expressions Switch parser function Time function Redirects Sections and TOCs Tables Introduction Basics Advanced table formatting Collapsing Conditional tables Sorting Using colours Links and diffs Links Interlanguage Interwiki Permanent Diffs Simplest diff guide Simple diff and link guide Complete diff and link guide Colon trick Link color Magic links Pipe trick URLs Media files: images, videos and sounds Media help Files Creation and usage Moving files to Commons Images Introduction to images Picture tutorial Preparing images for upload Uploading images Options to hide an image Extended image syntax SVG help Gallery tag Graphics tutorials Basic bitmap image editing How to improve image quality Graphics Lab resources Sound file markup Visual file markup Other graphics Family trees Graphs and charts How to create Barcharts To scale charts Math formulas Math symbols LaTeX symbols Rendering math Musical scores Musical symbols Timeline EasyTimeline syntax WikiHiero syntax Templates and Lua modules Templates Advanced template coding Template documentation Template index Template limits Template sandbox and test cases Citation templates Lua help Lua project Resources To do Substitution Purge Job queue Transclusion Labeled section Guide to Scribbling Data structure Namespaces Main/Article Category Draft File File description page Help Portal Project/Wikipedia Talk Archiving Template User User page design MediaWiki Bug reports and feature requests System message TimedMediaHandler extension Module Special HTML and CSS Cascading Style Sheets HTML in wikitext Catalogue of CSS classes Common.js and common.css User CSS for monospaced coding font Classes in Ambox Classes in microformats Markup validation Span tags Useful styles Customisation and tools Preferences Gadgets Skins Citation tools Cleaning up vandalism tools Customizing watchlists Hide pages IRC Scripts User scripts Guide Techniques User style Tools Alternative browsing Browser tools Editing tools Navigation shortcuts Optimum tool set Wikimedia Cloud Services Beta Features at MediaWiki Automated editing AfC helper script AutoWikiBrowser Bots Creating HotCat Huggle Navigation popups RedWarn Twinkle WPCleaner Inactive igloo STiki See also: Category:Wikipedia how-to Category:Wikipedia information pages Further navigation at: Help pages Administrators Accessibility Accounts Bots Referencing Citation metadata Templates User scripts v t e Wikipedia categorization Guidelines Categorization Categories, lists, and navigation templates Overcategorization Categorization of people Categorization of portals Categorization/Ethnicity, gender, religion and sexuality People by year Categorizing redirects Category names User categories Overcategorization/User categories Help pages Categories Category Classification Container category PetScan FAQ for readers FAQ for editors Template index/Category namespace Discussions Categories for discussion Categories for discussion/Speedy Categories for discussion/All current discussions Projectspace essays Categories are different from articles Categories versus lists Categorising fiction Do not write articles using categories Overcategorization/Intersection of location and occupation Wiki workflow WikiProject Plants/Description in year categories Userspace essays DexDor/Terminology categories DexDor/Categorization of award recipients Alan Liefting/On categorisation Coder Dan/Categories gracefool/What is a category? Kbdank71/Wikiproject notification Category:Wikipedia categorization Category:Contents WikiProject Categories Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Help:Category&oldid=971955741" Categories: Wikipedia information pages Wikipedia categorization Wikipedia how-to Wikipedia page help Hidden categories: Wikipedia semi-protected project pages Wikipedia indefinitely move-protected pages Help pages with short description Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Help page Talk Variants Views Read View source View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons MediaWiki Meta-Wiki Wikibooks Wikinews Wikiquote Wikisource Wikiversity Wiktionary Languages Alemannisch Bân-lâm-gú Башҡортса Беларуская भोजपुरी Boarisch Català Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français Galego Հայերեն Ilokano Íslenska Italiano Lëtzebuergesch मराठी Bahasa Melayu Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål ਪੰਜਾਬੀ پښتو ភាសាខ្មែរ Polski Português Ripoarisch Română Русский Scots Shqip Simple English سنڌي Slovenčina Slovenščina Svenska தமிழ் Татарча/tatarça Türkçe Українська اردو Yorùbá 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 9 August 2020, at 09:15 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2497 ---- Martial - Wikipedia Martial From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search "Martialis" redirects here. For the Roman writer on horticulture, see Quintus Gargilius Martialis. For the ant, see Martialis heureka. For other uses, see Martial (disambiguation). 1st-century Latin poet from Hispania Martial Born March, between 38 and 41 AD Augusta Bilbilis (now Calatayud, Spain) Died Between 102 and 104 AD Augusta Bilbilis Occupation Author Nationality Roman Genre Satire Notable works Epigrams Marcus Valerius Martialis (known in English as Martial /ˈmɑːrʃəl/) (March, between 38 and 41 AD – between 102 and 104 AD) was a Roman poet from Hispania (modern Spain) best known for his twelve books of Epigrams, published in Rome between AD 86 and 103, during the reigns of the emperors Domitian, Nerva and Trajan. In these short, witty poems he cheerfully satirises city life and the scandalous activities of his acquaintances, and romanticises his provincial upbringing. He wrote a total of 1,561 epigrams, of which 1,235 are in elegiac couplets. Martial was famously deaf in his left ear, an attribute most likely arising from a birth defect.[1] Martial has been called the greatest Latin epigrammatist,[2][3] and is considered the creator of the modern epigram. Contents 1 Early life 2 Life in Rome 3 Martial and his patrons 4 Martial's character 5 Martial's Epigrams 6 Reception 7 Notes 8 References 9 External links 9.1 Works 9.2 Other links Early life[edit] Knowledge of his origins and early life are derived almost entirely from his works, which can be more or less dated according to the well-known events to which they refer. In Book X of his Epigrams, composed between 95 and 98, he mentions celebrating his fifty-seventh birthday; hence he was born during March 38, 39, 40 or 41 AD (x. 24, 1),[4] under Caligula or Claudius. His place of birth was Augusta Bilbilis (now Calatayud) in Hispania Tarraconensis. His parents, Fronto and Flaccilla, appear to have died in his youth. His name seems to imply that he was born a Roman citizen, but he speaks of himself as "sprung from the Celts and Iberians, and a countryman of the Tagus"; and, in contrasting his own masculine appearance with that of an effeminate Greek, he draws particular attention to "his stiff Hispanian hair" (x. 65, 7). His home was evidently one of rude comfort and plenty, sufficiently in the country to afford him the amusements of hunting and fishing, which he often recalls with keen pleasure, and sufficiently near the town to afford him the companionship of many comrades, the few survivors of whom he looks forward to meeting again after his thirty-four years' absence (x. 104). The memories of this old home, and of other spots, the rough names and local associations which he delights to introduce into his verse, attest to the simple pleasures of his early life and were among the influences which kept his spirit alive in the stultifying routines of upper-crust social life in Rome. He was educated in Hispania, a part of the Roman Empire which in the 1st century produced several notable Latin writers, including Seneca the Elder and Seneca the Younger, Lucan and Quintilian, and Martial's contemporaries Licinianus of Bilbilis, Decianus of Emerita and Canius of Gades. Martial professes to be of the school of Catullus, Pedo, and Marsus. The epigram bears to this day the form impressed upon it by his unrivalled skill in wordsmithing. Life in Rome[edit] The success of his countrymen may have been what motivated Martial to move to Rome, from Hispania, once he had completed his education. This move occurred in AD 64. Seneca the Younger and Lucan may have served as his first patrons, but this is not known for sure. Not much is known of the details of his life for the first twenty years or so after he came to Rome. He published some juvenile poems of which he thought very little in his later years, and he chuckles at a foolish bookseller who would not allow them to die a natural death (I. 113). His faculty ripened with experience and with the knowledge of that social life which was both his theme and his inspiration; many of his best epigrams are among those written in his last years. From many answers which he makes to the remonstrances of friends—among others to those of Quintilian—it may be inferred that he was urged to practice at the bar, but that he preferred his own lazy, some would say Bohemian kind of life. He made many influential friends and patrons and secured the favor of both Titus and Domitian. From them he obtained various privileges, among others the semestris tribunatus, which conferred on him equestrian rank. Martial failed, however, in his application to Domitian for more substantial advantages, although he commemorates the glory of having been invited to dinner by him, and also the fact that he procured the privilege of citizenship for many persons on whose behalf he appealed to him. The earliest of his extant works, known as Liber spectaculorum, was first published at the opening of the Colosseum in the reign of Titus. It relates to the theatrical performances given by him, but the book as it now stands was published about the first year of Domitian, i.e. about the year 81. The favour of the emperor procured him the countenance of some of the worst creatures at the imperial court—among them of the notorious Crispinus, and probably of Paris, the supposed author of Juvenal's exile, for whose monument Martial afterwards wrote a eulogistic epitaph. The two books, numbered by editors XIII and XIV, known by the names of Xenia and Apophoreta—inscriptions in two lines each for presents—were published at the Saturnalia of 84. In 86 he produced the first two of the twelve books on which his reputation rests. From that time till his return to Hispania in 98 he published a volume almost every year. The first nine books and the first edition of Book X appeared in the reign of Domitian; Book XI. appeared at the end of 96, shortly after the accession of Nerva. A revised edition of book X, that which we now possess, appeared in 98, about the time of Trajan's entrance into Rome. The last book was written after three years' absence in Hispania, shortly before his death about the year 102 or 103. These twelve books bring Martial's ordinary mode of life between the age of forty-five and sixty before us. His regular home for thirty-five years was the bustle of metropolitan Rome. He lived at first up three flights of stairs, and his "garret" overlooked the laurels in front of the portico of Agrippa. He had a small villa and unproductive farm near Nomentum, in the Sabine territory, to which he occasionally retired from the pestilence, boors and noises of the city (ii. 38, xii. 57). In his later years he had also a small house on the Quirinal, near the temple of Quirinus. At the time when his third book was brought out he had retired for a short time to Cisalpine Gaul, in weariness, as he tells us, of his unprofitable attendance to the bigwigs of Rome. For a time he seems to have felt the charm of the new scenes which he visited, and in a later book (iv. 25) he contemplates the prospect of retiring to the neighbourhood of Aquileia and the Timavus. But the spell exercised over him by Rome and Roman society was too great; even the epigrams sent from Forum Corneli and the Aemilian Way ring much more of the Roman forum, and of the streets, baths, porticos, brothels, market stalls, public houses, and clubs of Rome, than of the places from which they are dated. His final departure from Rome was motivated by a weariness of the burdens imposed on him by his social position, and apparently the difficulties of meeting the ordinary expenses of living in the metropolis (x. 96); and he looks forward to a return to the scenes familiar to his youth. The well-known epigram addressed to Juvenal (xii. I 8) shows that for a time his ideal was happily realized; but the evidence of the prose epistle prefixed to Book XII proves and that he could not live happily away from the literary and social pleasures of Rome for long. The one consolation of his exile was a lady, Marcella, of whom he writes rather platonically as if she were his patroness—and it seems to have been a necessity of his life to always have a patron or patroness—rather than his wife or mistress. During his life at Rome, although he never rose to a position of real independence, he seems to have known many writers of the time. In addition to Lucan and Quintilian, he numbered among his friends Silius Italicus, Juvenal and Pliny the Younger. The silence which he and Statius, although authors writing at the same time, having common friends, maintain in regard to one another may be explained by mutual dislike. Martial in many places shows an undisguised contempt for the artificial kind of epic on which Statius's reputation chiefly rests; and it is possible that the respectable author of the Thebaid and the Silvae felt little admiration for the life or the works of the bohemian epigrammatist. Martial and his patrons[edit] Martial was dependent on his wealthy friends and patrons for gifts of money, for his dinner, and even for his dress, but the relation of client to patron had been recognized as an honourable one by the best Roman traditions. No blame had attached to Virgil or Horace on account of the favours which they received from Augustus and Maecenas, or of the return which they made for these favours in their verse. That old honourable relationship, however, greatly changed between Augustus and Domitian. Men of good birth and education, and sometimes even of high official position (Juv. i. 117), accepted the dole (sportula). Martial was merely following a general fashion in paying his court to "a lord," and he made the best of the custom. In his earlier career he used to accompany his patrons to their villas at Baiae or Tibur, and to attend their morning levees. Later on, he went to his own small country house, near Nomentum, and sent a poem, or a small volume of his poems, as his representative at the early visit. Martial's character[edit] Pliny the Younger, in the short tribute which he pays to him on hearing of his death, wrote, "He had as much good-nature as wit and pungency in his writings".[5] Martial professes to avoid personalities in his satire, and honour and sincerity (fides and simplicitas) seem to have been the qualities which he most admires in his friends. Some have found distasteful his apparent servile flattery to the worst of the many bad emperors of Rome in the 1st century. These were emperors Martial would later censure immediately after their death (xii. 6). However, he seems to have disliked hypocrisy in its many forms, and seems to be free from cant, pedantry, or affectation of any kind. Though many of his epigrams indicate a cynical disbelief in the character of women, yet others prove that he could respect and almost revere a refined and courteous lady. His own life in Rome afforded him no experience of domestic virtue; but his epigrams show that, even in the age which is known to modern readers chiefly from the Satires of Juvenal, virtue was recognized as the purest source of happiness. The tenderest element in Martial's nature seems, however, to have been his affection for children and for his dependents. Martial's Epigrams[edit] Martial's keen curiosity and power of observation are manifested in his epigrams. The enduring literary interest of Martial's epigrams arises as much from their literary quality as from the colorful references to human life that they contain. Martial's epigrams bring to life the spectacle and brutality of daily life in imperial Rome, with which he was intimately connected. From Martial, for example, we have a glimpse of living conditions in the city of Rome: "I live in a little cell, with a window that won't even close, In which Boreas himself would not want to live." Book VIII, No. 14. 5–6. As Jo-Ann Shelton has written, "fire was a constant threat in ancient cities because wood was a common building material and people often used open fires and oil lamps. However, some people may have deliberately set fire to their property in order to collect insurance money."[6] Martial makes this accusation in one of his epigrams: "Tongilianus, you paid two hundred for your house; An accident too common in this city destroyed it. You collected ten times more. Doesn't it seem, I pray, That you set fire to your own house, Tongilianus?" Book III, No. 52 Martial also pours scorn on the doctors of his day: "I felt a little ill and called Dr. Symmachus. Well, you came, Symmachus, but you brought 100 medical students with you. One hundred ice-cold hands poked and jabbed me. I didn't have a fever, Symmachus, when I called you –but now I do. Book V, No. 9 Martial's epigrams also refer to the extreme cruelty shown to slaves in Roman society. Below, he chides a man named Rufus for flogging his cook for a minor mistake: "You say that the hare isn't cooked, and ask for the whip; Rufus, you prefer to carve up your cook than your hare." Book III, No. 94 Martial's epigrams are also characterized by their biting and often scathing sense of wit as well as for their lewdness; this has earned him a place in literary history as the original insult comic. Below is a sample of his more insulting work: "You feign youth, Laetinus, with your dyed hair So suddenly you are a raven, but just now you were a swan. You do not deceive everyone. Proserpina knows you are grey-haired; She will remove the mask from your head." Book III, No. 43 "Rumor tells, Chiona, that you are a virgin, and that nothing is purer than your fleshy delights. Nevertheless, you do not bathe with the correct part covered: if you have the decency, move your panties onto your face." Book III, No. 87 "'You are a frank man', you are always telling me, Cerylus. Anyone who speaks against you, Cerylus, is a frank man." Book I, No. 67 "Eat lettuce and soft apples eat: For you, Phoebus, have the harsh face of a defecating man." Book III, No. 89 Or the following two examples (in translations by Mark Ynys-Mon): Fabullus' wife Bassa frequently totes A friend's baby, on which she loudly dotes. Why does she take on this childcare duty? It explains farts that are somewhat fruity. Book IV, No. 87 With your giant nose and cock I bet you can with ease When you get excited check the end for cheese. Book VI, No. 36 Along with Roman graffiti, the Epigrams are important sources for Latin obscene words. Reception[edit] The works of Martial became highly valued on their discovery by the Renaissance, whose writers often saw them as sharing an eye for the urban vices of their own times. The poet's influence is seen in Juvenal, late classical literature, the Carolingian revival, the Renaissance in France and Italy, the Siglo de Oro, and early modern English and German poetry, until he became unfashionable with the growth of the Romantic movement. The 21st century has seen a resurgence of scholarly attention to Martial's work.[7] Notes[edit] ^ "Martial". ^ Czigány, Lóránt. "Janus Pannonius". Library of Hungarian Studies. Retrieved January 19, 2017. ^ Johnston, Patricia A. "Epigrams and Satire in Latin Poetry". Oxford University Press. Retrieved January 19, 2017. ^ Not necessarily March 1, on account of the habit of celebrating one's birthday on that day if one had been born during that month: D. R. Shackleton Bailey, Martial. Epigrams. Edited and translated by D. R. S. B. (Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press, 1993), vol. I, p. 1 n. 1. ^ Pliny the Younger, Letters, 3.21 ^ Jo-Ann Shelton, As the Romans Did: A Sourcebook in Roman Social History (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988), 65. ^ Lucci, Joseph M. (2015). "Hidden in Plain Sight: Martial and the Greek Epigrammatic Tradition". University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved January 19, 2017. References[edit] Coleman, Kathleen M. (2006). "The Identity of Caesar." In M. Valerii Martialis Liber Spectaculorum. Edited by Kathleen Coleman, xlv–lxiv. New York: Oxford Univ. Press. Fagan, Garrett G. (1999). "A Visit to the Baths with Martial" In Bathing in Public in the Roman World. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Fitzgerald, William. (2007). Martial: The World of the Epigram. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press. Howell, Peter. (2009). Martial. Ancients in Action. London: Bristol Classical Press. Leary, Timothy John. (2012). "Modifying Martial in Nineteenth-Century Britain." In Expurgating the Classics: Editing Out in Greek and Latin. Edited by Stephen Harrison and Christopher Stray. London: Bristol Classical Press. Nisbet, Gideon. (2003). Greek Epigram in the Roman Empire: Martial’s Forgotten Rivals. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. Rimell, Victoria. (2008). Martial’s Rome: Empire and the Ideology of Epigram. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press. Sapsford, Francesca May (2012). The 'Epic' of Martial. University of Birmingham PhD thesis. Stanley, Farland. (2014). "Observations on Martial's Imagery of Provincial Spain." Glotta, 90, 192-215. Sullivan, John P. (2004). Martial: The Unexpected Classic: A Literary and Historical Study. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press. Sullivan, John P. (1989). "Martial’s “Witty Conceits”: Some Technical Observations." Illinois Classical Studies 14.1/2: 185–199. External links[edit] Wikimedia Commons has media related to Marcus Valerius Martialis. Wikiquote has quotations related to: Martial Wikisource has original works written by or about: Martial Latin Wikisource has original text related to this article: Marcus Valerius Martialis Library resources about Martial Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries By Martial Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries Works[edit] Works by Martial at Perseus Digital Library Epigrammaton libri (in Latin) at The Latin Library. Complete Epigrams (in English, 1897 edition) at The Tertullian Project—actually incomplete: scatological and sexually explicit material is left untranslated. Martial Blog—translations from much of the first three books of Epigrams Selected Epigrams translated by A. S. Kline Selected Epigrams translated by Elizabeth Duke Selected Epigrams in translation at Theatre of Pompey: 2:14; 6:9; 10:51; 11:1; 11:47; 14:29; 14:166 Some of Martial's more risqué Epigrams translated by Joseph S Salemi Translations from Martial by Franklin P Adams Other links[edit] Poems by Martial at PoemHunter.com Martial Quotations at The Quotations Page SORGLL: Martial I.96, V.41, and X.30; read by Wakefield Foster Court Poet & Pornographer Glen Bowersock on Martial from The New York Review of Books * This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Martial". Encyclopædia Britannica. 17 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 788–790. v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films Authority control BIBSYS: 90071369 BNC: 000078040 BNE: XX1061108 BNF: cb11886893t (data) CANTIC: a10322553 CiNii: DA00624050 GND: 11857826X ICCU: IT\ICCU\CFIV\024822 ISNI: 0000 0001 2358 4924 LCCN: n82013667 LNB: 000118925 MBA: 716e8313-cfb4-42c2-9c8c-f13eadd608f9 NDL: 00448954 NKC: skuk0000831 NLA: 35601942 NLG: 218473 NLI: 000089516 NLP: A11807659 NSK: 000152921 NTA: 068570279 RERO: 02-A000110912 SELIBR: 195258 SNAC: w6z33x70 SUDOC: 027383709 Trove: 1010714 ULAN: 500214511 VcBA: 495/17422 VIAF: 8099277 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n82013667 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Martial&oldid=991710810" Categories: 1st-century births 100s deaths 1st-century Romans 2nd-century Romans 1st-century writers 2nd-century writers Latin-language writers Roman-era satirists Silver Age Latin writers Romans from Hispania Epigrammatists People from Calatayud Valerii Ancient LGBT people Hidden categories: Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata Commons category link is on Wikidata Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica with Wikisource reference Wikipedia articles incorporating text from the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNC identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CANTIC identifiers Wikipedia articles with CINII identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ICCU identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with LNB identifiers Wikipedia articles with MusicBrainz identifiers Wikipedia articles with NDL identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLG identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLI identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLP identifiers Wikipedia articles with NSK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with RERO identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SNAC-ID identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with Trove identifiers Wikipedia articles with ULAN identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers AC with 28 elements Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikiquote Wikisource Languages Afrikaans العربية Aragonés Asturianu تۆرکجه Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ Български Brezhoneg Català Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français Frysk Furlan Galego 한국어 Հայերեն Hrvatski Bahasa Indonesia Íslenska Italiano עברית Latina Magyar Македонски Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Polski Português Română Русский Sicilianu Slovenčina Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Türkçe Українська 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 1 December 2020, at 12:33 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2524 ---- International Standard Name Identifier - Wikipedia International Standard Name Identifier From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia   (Redirected from ISNI (identifier)) Jump to navigation Jump to search 16 digit identifier for people and organisations This article relies too much on references to primary sources. Please improve this by adding secondary or tertiary sources. (December 2015) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) International Standard Name Identifier Acronym ISNI Organisation ISNI-IA Introduced March 15, 2012 (2012-03-15) No. of digits 16 Check digit MOD 11-2 Example 000000012146438X Website isni.org The International Standard Name Identifier (ISNI) is an identifier system for uniquely identifying the public identities of contributors to media content such as books, television programmes, and newspaper articles. Such an identifier consists of 16 digits. It can optionally be displayed as divided into four blocks. ISNI can be used to disambiguate named entities that might otherwise be confused, and links the data about names that are collected and used in all sectors of the media industries. It was developed under the auspices of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) as Draft International Standard 27729; the valid standard was published on 15 March 2012. The ISO technical committee 46, subcommittee 9 (TC 46/SC 9) is responsible for the development of the standard. Contents 1 ISNI format 1.1 Format without space 1.2 Format with space 2 Uses of an ISNI 2.1 ORCID 3 Organisations involved in the management 3.1 ISNI Registration Authority 3.2 ISNI Registration Agencies 3.3 ISNI members 4 ISNI assignment 5 ISNI coverage 6 See also 7 References 8 Further reading 9 External links ISNI format[edit] The FAQ of the isni.org websites states "An ISNI is made up of 16 digits, the last character being a check character."[1] Format without space[edit] MARC: it was proposed to store the ISNI without spaces, e.g.(isni)1234567899999799[2] isni.org URL: no spaces, e.g. http://www.isni.org/isni/0000000114559647 viaf.org: URL https://viaf.org/viaf/118892012/ URL https://viaf.org/processed/ISNI%7C0000000114559647 the data dumps contain it in form ISNI|0000000114559647 Format with space[edit] In display it is frequently shown with spaces. isni.org[3] viaf.org[4] Uses of an ISNI[edit] The ISNI allows a single identity (such as an author's pseudonym or the imprint used by a publisher) to be identified using a unique number. This unique number can then be linked to any of the numerous other identifiers that are used across the media industries to identify names and other forms of identity. An example of the use of such a number is the identification of a musical performer who is also a writer both of music and of poems. Where he or she might currently be identified in many different databases using numerous private and public identification systems, under the ISNI system, he or she would have a single linking ISNI record. The many different databases could then exchange data about that particular identity without resorting to messy methods such as comparing text strings. An often quoted example in the English language world is the difficulty faced when identifying 'John Smith' in a database. While there may be many records for 'John Smith', it is not always clear which record refers to the specific 'John Smith' that is required. If an author has published under several different names or pseudonyms, each such name will receive its own ISNI. ISNI can be used by libraries and archives when sharing catalogue information; for more precise searching for information online and in databases, and it can aid the management of rights across national borders and in the digital environment. ORCID[edit] ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID) identifiers consist of a reserved block of ISNI identifiers for scholarly researchers[5] and administered by a separate organisation.[5] Individual researchers can create and claim their own ORCID identifier.[6] The two organisations coordinate their efforts.[5][6] Organisations involved in the management[edit] ISNI Registration Authority[edit] According to ISO the Registration Authority for ISO 27729:2012 is the "ISNI International Agency".[7] It is located in London (c/o EDItEUR)[8] It is incorporated under the Companies Act 2006 as a private company limited by guarantee.[9] The 'International Agency' is commonly known as the ISNI-IA.[10][11] This UK registered, not-for-profit company has been founded by a consortium of organisations consisting of the Confédération Internationale des Sociétés d'Auteurs et Compositeurs (CISAC), the Conference of European National Librarians (CENL), the International Federation of Reproduction Rights Organisations (IFRRO), the International Performers Database Association (IPDA), the Online Computer Library Center (OCLC) and ProQuest. It is managed by directors nominated from these organisations and, in the case of CENL, by representatives of the Bibliothèque nationale de France and the British Library. ISNI Registration Agencies[edit] A registration agency provides the interface between ISNI applicants and the ISNI Assignment Agency.[12] List of Registration Agencies in order as on ISNI-IA website Name (as on ISNI-IA website) Since Relation Biblioteca Nacional de España (BNE) Spain BnF (Bibliothèque nationale de France) 2014[13] France Bibliothèque nationale de Luxembourg Luxembourg British Library UK BTLF (Société de gestion de la Banque de Titres de Langue Française) France Casalini Libri Italy China Knowledge Centre for Engineering Sciences and Technology (CKCEST) China Consolidated Independent United Kingdom Electre Identification Agency (IDA) Russia Koninklijke Bibliotheek Netherlands Kültür ve Turizm Bakanliği Turkey National Assembly Library of Korea South Korea National Library of Korea South Korea National Library of Poland Poland Numerical Gurus United States Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC) Quansic Switzerland Ringgold organisations, international Rakuten Kobo Canada Sound Exchange Inc. United States Sound Credit United States YouTube 2018[14] international In 2018, YouTube became an ISNI registry, and announced its intention to begin creating ISNI IDs for the musicians whose videos it features.[15] ISNI anticipates the number of ISNI IDs "going up by perhaps 3-5 million over the next couple of years" as a result.[16] In 2020, Sound Credit, together with ISNI, announced that music industry ISNI registrations were free and automated. The free registration system is part of Sound Credit user profile creation, used by its larger system for music crediting. It includes an automated search to avoid duplicate ISNIs and a certificate generated by the Sound Credit registration system to officiate newly registered ISNIs.[17] ISNI members[edit] ISNI members (ISNI-IA Members[18]) as of 2018[update]-07-11:[18] ABES (French Bibliographic Agency for Higher Education) Brill Publishers CEDRO (Centro Español de Derechos Reprográficos) CDR (Centrale Discotheek Rotterdam) Copyrus FCCN French National Archives (Archives nationales de France) Harvard University Iconoclaste Irish Copyright Licensing Agency (ICLA) ISSN International Centre La Trobe University Library of Congress MacOdrum Library, Carleton University National Library of Finland National Library of New Zealand National Library of Norway National Library of Sweden (Kungliga Biblioteket) Publishers' Licensing Services UNSW Library ISNI assignment[edit] ISNI-IA uses an assignment system comprising a user interface, data-schema, disambiguation algorithms, and database that meets the requirements of the ISO standard, while also using existing technology where possible. The system is based primarily on the Virtual International Authority File (VIAF) service, which has been developed by OCLC for use in the aggregation of library catalogues. Access to the assignment system and database, and to the numbers that are generated as the output of the process, are controlled by independent bodies known as 'registration agencies'. These registration agencies deal directly with customers, ensuring that data is provided in appropriate formats and recompensing the ISNI-IA for the cost of maintaining the assignment system. Registration agencies are appointed by ISNI-IA but will be managed and funded independently. ISNI coverage[edit] As of 5 August 2017[update] ISNI holds public records of over 9.41 million identities, including 8.757 million people (of which 2.606 million are researchers) and 654,074 organisations.[19] As of 19 April 2018[update] 9.86 million identities, including 9.15 million people (of which 2.86 million are researchers) and 714,401 organisations.[19] As of 11 July 2018[update] 10 million identities, including: 9.28 million people (of which 2.87 million are researchers) 717,204 organisations.[19] As of 13 August 2018[update] 10 million identities, including: 9.32 million people (of which 2.87 million are researchers) 717,795 organisations.[19] As of 17 October 2018[update] 10 million identities, including: 9.39 million people (of which 2.87 million are researchers) 719,010 organisations.[19] As of 5 December 2018[update] 10 million identities, including: 9.4 million people (of which 2.88 million are researchers) 826,810 organisations.[19] As of 11 March 2019[update] over 10 million identities, including: 9.59 million people (of which 2.88 million are researchers) 864,999 organisations.[19] As of 21 June 2019[update] over 10.5 million identities, including: 9.6 million people (of which 2.88 million are researchers) 876,017 organisations.[19] As of 27 November 2019[update] over 10.92 million identities, including: 10.01 million people (of which 2.89 million are researchers) 908,299 organisations.[19] As of 13 February 2020[update] over 11.02 million identities, including: 10.11 million people (of which 2.91 million are researchers) 912,991 organisations.[19] As of 20 October 2020[update] over 11.51 million identities, including: 10.45 million individuals (of which 2.91 million are researchers) 1,062,333 organisations.[19] See also[edit] Authority control Digital Author Identification (DAI) Digital object identifier (DOI) GRID International Standard Text Code (ISTC) ResearcherID Ringgold identifier References[edit] ^ "ISNI - FAQ". www.isni.org. Retrieved 19 April 2018. ^ Office, Library of Congress Network Development and MARC Standards. "Encoding the International Standard Name Identifier (ISNI) in the MARC 21 Bibliographic and Authority Formats". www.loc.gov. Retrieved 19 April 2018. ^ "ISNI 000000012281955X Ai-en-ssu-tan (1879-1955)". www.isni.org. Retrieved 19 April 2018. ^ http://viaf.org/viaf/75121530/ ^ a b c "What is the relationship between ISNI and ORCID?". About ORCID. ORCID. Retrieved 10 February 2020. ^ a b "ISNI and ORCID". ISNI. Archived from the original on 4 March 2013. Retrieved 29 March 2013. ^ "Maintenance agencies and registration authorities". Iso.org. Retrieved 16 July 2018. ^ "ISNI International Agency - ISNI International Agency". Iso.org. Retrieved 16 July 2018. ^ http://www.isni.org/filedepot_download/134/473 ^ "ISNI". Retrieved 19 December 2014. ^ "About the ISNI International Agency". Retrieved 19 December 2014. ^ "Registration Agencies". ISNI. Retrieved 16 July 2018. ^ "BnF: First National Library In the World to Become an ISNI Registration Agency". ISNI. Retrieved 16 July 2018. ^ "YouTube Adopts ISNI ID for Artists & Songwriters". ISNI. 22 January 2018. Retrieved 16 July 2018. ^ "YouTube Adopts ISNI ID for Artists & Songwriters". ISNI. Retrieved 1 June 2018. ^ "Transcript: YouTube Knows Who You Are". Beyond the Book. 18 March 2018. Retrieved 1 June 2018. ^ "Music Industry ISNI Registrations Now Free and Automated". ISNI. 23 October 2020. Retrieved 27 November 2020. ^ a b "Members". ISNI. Retrieved 16 July 2018. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k "ISNI". www.isni.org. Retrieved 19 April 2018. Further reading[edit] Karen Smith-Yoshimura, Janifer Gatenby, Grace Agnew, Christopher Brown, Kate Byrne, Matt Carruthers, Peter Fletcher, Stephen Hearn, Xiaoli Li, Marina Muilwijk, Chew Chiat Naun, John Riemer, Roderick Sadler, Jing Wang, Glen Wiley, and Kayla Willey. 233 "Addressing the Challenges with Organizational Identifiers and ISNI." Dublin, Ohio: OCLC Research. External links[edit] Wikidata has the property: ISNI (P213) (see uses) Official website v t e International numbering standards Standards ISO 2108: International Standard Book Number (ISBN) ISO 3297: International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) ISO 3901: International Standard Recording Code (ISRC) ISO 6166: International Securities Identification Number (ISIN) ISO/IEC 7812: Issuer Identification Number (IIN) ISO 9362: Business Entity Identifier (BIC) ISO 10957: International Standard Music Number (ISMN) ISO 13616: International Bank Account Number (IBAN) ISO 15511: International Standard Identifier for Libraries... (ISIL) ISO 15706: International Standard Audiovisual Number (ISAN) ISO 15707: International Standard Musical Work Code (ISWC) ISO 17316: International Standard Link Identifier (ISLI) ISO 17442: Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) ISO 21047: International Standard Text Code (ISTC) ISO 26324: Digital Object Identifier System (DOI) ISO 27729: International Standard Name Identifier (ISNI) ISO 27730: International Standard Collection Identifier (ISCI) CAE/IPI Virtual International Authority File (VIAF) v t e ISO standards by standard number List of ISO standards / ISO romanizations / IEC standards 1–9999 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 16 17 31 -0 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 -8 -9 -10 -11 -12 -13 68-1 128 216 217 226 228 233 259 261 262 269 302 306 361 428 500 518 519 639 -1 -2 -3 -5 -6 646 657 668 690 704 732 764 838 843 860 898 965 999 1000 1004 1007 1073-1 1073-2 1155 1413 1538 1629 1745 1989 2014 2015 2022 2033 2047 2108 2145 2146 2240 2281 2533 2709 2711 2720 2788 2848 2852 3029 3103 3166 -1 -2 -3 3297 3307 3601 3602 3864 3901 3950 3977 4031 4157 4165 4217 4909 5218 5426 5427 5428 5725 5775 5776 5800 5807 5964 6166 6344 6346 6385 6425 6429 6438 6523 6709 6943 7001 7002 7010 7027 7064 7098 7185 7200 7498 -1 7637 7736 7810 7811 7812 7813 7816 7942 8000 8093 8178 8217 8373 8501-1 8571 8583 8601 8613 8632 8651 8652 8691 8805/8806 8807 8820-5 8859 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 -8 -8-I -9 -10 -11 -12 -13 -14 -15 -16 8879 9000/9001 9036 9075 9126 9141 9227 9241 9293 9314 9362 9407 9496 9506 9529 9564 9592/9593 9594 9660 9797-1 9897 9899 9945 9984 9985 9995 10000–19999 10005 10006 10007 10116 10118-3 10160 10161 10165 10179 10206 10218 10303 -11 -21 -22 -28 -238 10383 10487 10585 10589 10646 10664 10746 10861 10957 10962 10967 11073 11170 11179 11404 11544 11783 11784 11785 11801 11889 11898 11940 (-2) 11941 11941 (TR) 11992 12006 12182 12207 12234-2 12620 13211 -1 -2 13216 13250 13399 13406-2 13450 13485 13490 13567 13568 13584 13616 13816 14000 14031 14224 14289 14396 14443 14496 -2 -3 -6 -10 -11 -12 -14 -17 -20 14644 14649 14651 14698 14750 14764 14882 14971 15022 15189 15288 15291 15292 15398 15408 15444 -3 15445 15438 15504 15511 15686 15693 15706 -2 15707 15897 15919 15924 15926 15926 WIP 15930 16023 16262 16355-1 16612-2 16750 16949 (TS) 17024 17025 17100 17203 17369 17442 17799 18000 18004 18014 18245 18629 18916 19005 19011 19092 -1 -2 19114 19115 19125 19136 19407 19439 19500 19501 19502 19503 19505 19506 19507 19508 19509 19510 19600 19752 19757 19770 19775-1 19794-5 19831 20000+ 20000 20022 20121 20400 21000 21047 21500 21827 22000 22300 22395 23270 23271 23360 24517 24613 24617 24707 25178 25964 26000 26262 26300 26324 27000 series 27000 27001 27002 27005 27006 27729 28000 29110 29148 29199-2 29500 30170 31000 32000 37001 38500 40500 42010 45001 50001 55000 80000 -1 Category v t e Authority control files AAG • ACM DL • ADB • AGSA • autores.uy • AWR • BALaT • BIBSYS • Bildindex • BNC • BNE • BNF • Botanist • BPN • CANTIC • CiNii • CWGC • DAAO • DBLP • DSI • FNZA • GND • HDS • IAAF • ICCU • ICIA • ISNI • Joconde • KulturNav • LCCN • LIR • LNB • Léonore • MBA • MGP • NARA • NBL • NDL • NGV • NKC • NLA • NLG • NLI • NLK • NLP • NLR • NSK • NTA • ORCID • PIC • ResearcherID • RERO • RKD • RKDimages ID • RSL • SELIBR • SIKART • SNAC • SUDOC • S2AuthorId • TA98 • TDVİA • TE • TePapa • TH • TLS • Trove • UKPARL • ULAN • US Congress • VcBA • VIAF • WorldCat Identities Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=International_Standard_Name_Identifier&oldid=992104910" Categories: ISO standards Unique identifiers Library cataloging and classification Hidden categories: Articles with short description Short description matches Wikidata Articles lacking reliable references from December 2015 All articles lacking reliable references Articles containing potentially dated statements from 2018 All articles containing potentially dated statements Articles containing potentially dated statements from August 2017 Articles containing potentially dated statements from April 2018 Articles containing potentially dated statements from July 2018 Articles containing potentially dated statements from August 2018 Articles containing potentially dated statements from October 2018 Articles containing potentially dated statements from December 2018 Articles containing potentially dated statements from March 2019 Articles containing potentially dated statements from June 2019 Articles containing potentially dated statements from November 2019 Articles containing potentially dated statements from February 2020 Articles containing potentially dated statements from October 2020 AC with 0 elements Use dmy dates from May 2020 Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages العربية Asturianu Bân-lâm-gú भोजपुरी Български Català Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français Gàidhlig Galego 한국어 हिन्दी Hrvatski Ilokano Bahasa Indonesia Italiano עברית Magyar Македонски Malagasy മലയാളം मराठी مصرى Bahasa Melayu Nederlands 日本語 Nordfriisk Occitan Polski Português Română Русский Scots Simple English Slovenčina Slovenščina Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Türkçe Українська Tiếng Việt 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 3 December 2020, at 14:53 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2558 ---- Category:Wikipedia articles with NLI identifiers - Wikipedia Help Category:Wikipedia articles with NLI identifiers From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search This category is for articles with NLI identifiers. Please do not add subcategories. For more information, see Wikipedia:Authority control. Administrators: Please do not delete this category even if it is empty! This category may be empty occasionally or even most of the time. This is a maintenance category, used for maintenance of the Wikipedia project. It is not part of the encyclopedia and contains non-article pages, or groups articles by status rather than subject. Do not include this category in content categories. This is a tracking category. It builds and maintains a list of pages primarily for the sake of the list itself. They are not part of the encyclopedia's categorization scheme. This category is hidden on its member pages—unless the corresponding user preference (appearance → show hidden categories) is set. These categories are used to track, build and organize lists of pages needing "attention en masse" (for example, pages using deprecated syntax), or that may need to be edited at someone's earliest convenience. These categories also serve to aggregate members of several lists or sub-categories into a larger, more efficient list (discriminated by classifications). Contents: Top 0–9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z * # 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 • A Aa Ae Aj Ao At • B Ba Be Bj Bo Bt • C Ca Ce Cj Co Ct • D Da De Dj Do Dt • E Ea Ee Ej Eo Et • F Fa Fe Fj Fo Ft • G Ga Ge Gj Go Gt • H Ha He Hj Ho Ht • I Ia Ie Ij Io It • J Ja Je Jj Jo Jt • K Ka Ke Kj Ko Kt • L La Le Lj Lo Lt • M Ma Me Mj Mo Mt • N Na Ne Nj No Nt • O Oa Oe Oj Oo Ot • P Pa Pe Pj Po Pt • Q Qa Qe Qj Qo Qt • R Ra Re Rj Ro Rt • S Sa Se Sj So St • T Ta Te Tj To Tt • U Ua Ue Uj Uo Ut • V Va Ve Vj Vo Vt • W Wa We Wj Wo Wt • X Xa Xe Xj Xo Xt • Y Ya Ye Yj Yo Yt • Z Za Ze Zj Zo Zt Pages in this category should only be added by Module:Authority control. Pages in category "Wikipedia articles with NLI identifiers" The following 200 pages are in this category, out of approximately 46,727 total. This list may not reflect recent changes (learn more). (previous page) (next page), Ishida Hakyō Saitō Sanki Yamaguchi Seishi 0–9 The 12 Cellists of the Berlin Philharmonic 929: Tanakh B'yachad 2006 Lebanon War 2014 Israel–Gaza conflict A Thomas Turner à Beckett A Clare Benediction A.L. Monsohn Lithography Pieter van der Aa Aachen RWTH Aachen University Aachen Cathedral Treasury Aachen Town Hall Hans von Aachen Roman Catholic Diocese of Aachen Bertus Aafjes Gunnar Aagaard Andersen G. Ch. Aalders Aalen Aino Aalto Alvar Aalto Asbjørn Aarnes Aaron ben Jacob ha-Kohen Aaron of Jerusalem Aaron of Pesaro Izaak Aaronowicz Jules Aarons Aaron Aaronsohn Alexander Aaronsohn Sarah Aaronsohn Aart van der Leeuw Kees Aarts Jan Aaseth Arnstein Aassve Ab Urbe Condita Libri Diego Abad de Santillán Gémino Abad Moussa Abadi Shy Abady Vasily Abaev Lajos Abafi Magdalena Abakanowicz Iñaki Ábalos Marie Thérèse Péroux d'Abany Carmine Abate Firmin Abauzit Gustav Abb ABBA Giuseppe Cesare Abba Mostafa El-Abbadi Arnaud-Michel d'Abbadie Claudio Abbado Nicola Abbagnano Ferhat Abbas Ibn Abbas Ihsan Abbas Moses Judah Abbas Elfriede Abbe Ernst Abbe George Abbe Jean Baptiste Abbeloos Leon Abbett Abbeville, South Carolina Abbey Church of Sainte-Foy Edward Abbey Edwin Austin Abbey Henry Abbey Andrew Arthur Abbie Abbo Cernuus Abiel Abbot Charles Greeley Abbot Ezra Abbot Francis Ellingwood Abbot William Wright Abbot Willis J. Abbot Austin Abbott Benjamin Vaughan Abbott Berenice Abbott Bud Abbott Carl Abbott (urban historian) David Abbott (magician) Edith Abbott Edwin Abbott (educator) Edwin Abbott Abbott Evelyn Abbott Frank Frost Abbott Leonard Abbott Lyman Abbott Maude Abbott Nabia Abbott Thomas Kingsmill Abbott Wilbur Cortez Abbott Thomas Abbt ABC No Rio Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab Abd al-Malik ibn Marwan Abd-ru-shin Anouar Abdel-Malek Muddathir Abdel-Rahim Emir Abdelkader Abdelwahab Bouhdiba Emil Abderhalden Abed Abdi Mohammed Abdu Muhammad Abduh Abdul Hamid II Abdul Jabbar Jomard Tunku Abdul Rahman Ibn Ashir ʻAbdu'l-Bahá Paula Abdul Abdullah I of Jordan Abdullah II of Jordan Abdullah of Saudi Arabia Achmed Abdullah Sheikh Abdullah Taha Abdurrahman Kōbō Abe Ryuichi Abe Shinzo Abe Yael Abecassis Arthur William à Beckett Gilbert Abbott à Beckett Zainul Abedin David Abeel Julius Friedrich Heinrich Abegg Lily Abegg Martin Abegg Richard Abegg Adolf Abel Alan Abel Carl Abel Carl Friedrich Abel Clarke Abel Frederick Abel Jacob Friedrich von Abel Kathryn Abel Niels Henrik Abel Othenio Abel Rudolf Abel Theodora Mead Abel Wilhelm Abel Raymond Abellio Richard Abels Philip Abelson Walter Abendroth Wolfgang Abendroth Miguel Abensour John Abercrombie (guitarist) John Abercrombie (physician) Lascelles Abercrombie Minnie Abercrombie Ralph Abercromby Ralph Abercromby (meteorologist) Alfred Aberdam Jan Håkan Åberg Aberjhani David Aberle Sophie Bledsoe Aberle Johann Ludwig Aberli Penny Abernathy Ralph Abernathy Anna Amalie Abert Hermann Abert Johann Joseph Abert Giorgio Abetti Otto Abetz Abhishiktananda Jaishri Abichandani Johann Georg Abicht Abidjan William Abikoff Abingdon Abbey Abingdon-on-Thames Simon Abkarian William de Wiveleslie Abney Åbo Akademi University Isaac Aboab of Castile Samuel Aboab Susan Abod James Abourezk Edmond François Valentin About Abraham Abraham ben David Abraham Mintchine Apocalypse of Abraham Ben Abraham Gerald Abraham Jacob Abraham (medalist) Karl Abraham Max Abraham Nabeel Abraham Nicolas Abraham Paul Abraham Pearl Abraham Adolphe Abrahams Israel Abrahams Peter Abrahams (previous page) (next page) Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Wikipedia_articles_with_NLI_identifiers&oldid=908338397" Categories: Pages with NLI identifiers Wikipedia articles with authority control information Hidden categories: Hidden categories Tracking categories Template Large category TOC via CatAutoTOC on category with over 20,000 pages CatAutoTOC generates Large category TOC Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Category Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Afrikaans 한국어 Ilokano עברית Bahasa Melayu 日本語 Sardu Scots Suomi Türkçe Edit links This page was last edited on 29 July 2019, at 02:52 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2560 ---- Template:Horace - Wikipedia Template:Horace From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search v t e Works by Horace Poetry Satires Epodes Odes Epistles Carmen Saeculare Ars Poetica Collections Satires 2.5 Quote Ut pictura poesis Related Spring of Bandusium Initial visibility: currently defaults to autocollapse To set this template's initial visibility, the |state= parameter may be used: |state=collapsed: {{Horace|state=collapsed}} to show the template collapsed, i.e., hidden apart from its title bar |state=expanded: {{Horace|state=expanded}} to show the template expanded, i.e., fully visible |state=autocollapse: {{Horace|state=autocollapse}} shows the template collapsed to the title bar if there is a {{navbar}}, a {{sidebar}}, or some other table on the page with the collapsible attribute shows the template in its expanded state if there are no other collapsible items on the page If the |state= parameter in the template on this page is not set, the template's initial visibility is taken from the |default= parameter in the Collapsible option template. For the template on this page, that currently evaluates to autocollapse. Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Horace&oldid=972382073" Categories: Ancient Roman writer navigational boxes Poet navigational boxes Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Template Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Italiano Edit links This page was last edited on 11 August 2020, at 19:07 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2570 ---- Military of ancient Rome - Wikipedia Military of ancient Rome From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Part of a series on the Military of ancient Rome 753 BC – AD 476 Structural history Army Unit types and ranks Decorations and punishments Legions Auxilia Generals Navy Fleets Admirals Campaign history Wars and battles Technological history Military engineering Castra Siege engines Triumphal arches Roads Political history   Strategy and tactics Infantry tactics Frontiers and fortifications Limes Limes Britannicus Antonine Wall Hadrian's Wall Saxon Shore Limes Germanicus Alb Limes Lauter Valley Limes Lower Germanic Limes Main Limes Neckar-Odenwald Limes Upper Germanic-Rhaetian Limes Wetterau Limes Danube–Iller–Rhine Limes Norican Limes Claustra Alpium Iuliarum Pannonian Limes Limes Alutanus Limes Moesiae Trajan's Wall Anastasian Wall Limes Sarmatiae Limes Arabicus Limes Tripolitanus Limes Mauretaniae  Ancient Rome portal •  War portal v t e The military of ancient Rome, according to Titus Livius, one of the more illustrious historians of Rome over the centuries, was a key element in the rise of Rome over “above seven hundred years”[1] from a small settlement in Latium to the capital of an empire governing a wide region around the shorty of the Mediterranean, or, as the Romans themselves said, ‘’mare nostrum’’, “our sea". Livy asserts: ”... if any people ought to be allowed to consecrate their origins and refer them to a divine source, so great is the military glory of the Roman People that when they profess that their Father and the Father of their Founder was none other than Mars, the nations of the earth may well submit to this also with as good a grace as they submit to Rome's dominion.” Titus Flavius Josephus, a contemporary historian, sometime high-ranking officer in the Roman army, and commander of the rebels in the Jewish revolt describes the Roman people as if they were "born readily armed."[2] At the time of the two historians, Roman society had already evolved an effective military and had used it to defend itself against the Etruscans, the Italics, the Greeks, the Gauls, the maritime empire of Carthage, and the Macedonian kingdoms. In each war, it acquired more territory until, when the civil war ended the Roman Republic, nothing was left for the first emperor, Augustus, to do except declare it an empire and defend it.[citation needed] The role and structure of the military were then altered during the empire. It became less Roman, the duties of border protection and territorial administration being more and more taken by foreign mercenaries officered by Romans. When they divided at last into warring factions the empire fell, unable to keep out invading armies. During the Roman Republic, the function of the military was defined as service to the ‘’Senatus Populusque Romanus’’ - an agency designated by 'SPQR' on public inscriptions. Its main body was the senate, which met in a building still extant in the forum of Rome. Its decrees were handed off to the two chief officers of the state, the consuls. They could levy from the citizens whatever military force they judged was necessary to execute such decree. This conscription was executed through a draft of male citizens assembled by age class. The officers of the legion were tasked with selecting men for the ranks. The will of the SPQR was binding on the consuls and the men, with the death penalty often assigned for disobedience or failure. The men were under a rigorous code, known now for its punitive crucifixion. The consular duties were of any type whatever: military defense, police work, public hygiene, assistance in a civil disaster, health work, agriculture, and especially the construction of public roads, bridges, aqueducts, buildings, and the maintenance of such. The soldiers were kept busy doing whatever service needed to be done: soldiering, manning vessels, carpentry, blacksmithing, clerking, etc. They were trained as required, but also previous skills, such as a trade, were exploited. They brought to the task and were protected by the authority of the state. The military's campaign history stretched over 1300 years and saw Roman armies campaigning as far east as Parthia (modern-day Iran), as far south as Africa (modern-day Tunisia) and Aegyptus (modern-day Egypt) and as far north as Britannia (modern-day England, south Scotland, and Wales). The makeup of the Roman military changed substantially over its history, from its early history as an unsalaried citizen militia to a later professional force, the Imperial Roman army. The equipment used by the military altered greatly in type over time, though there were very few technological improvements in weapons manufacture, in common with the rest of the classical world. For much of its history, the vast majority of Rome's forces were maintained at or beyond the limits of its territory, to either expand Rome's domain or protect its existing borders. Expansions were infrequent, as the emperors, adopting a strategy of fixed lines of defense, had determined to maintain existing borders. For that purpose, they constructed extensive walls and created permanent stations that became cities. Contents 1 Personnel 1.1 Population base of the early empire 1.2 Recruitment 1.3 Military subculture 2 Funding and expenditures 2.1 Private funding 2.2 Plunder economy 2.3 Taxation 3 Capabilities 3.1 Readiness and disposition 3.2 Power projection 3.3 Sustainability 3.4 Policing 3.5 Engineering 4 International stance 4.1 Grand strategy 4.2 Campaigns 5 Equipment 6 Medicine 6.1 Need for specialized care 6.2 Roman hospitals 6.3 Physicians 6.4 Distinctions in practice 6.5 Diet 6.6 Scale 6.7 Source of knowledge 7 See also 8 References 8.1 Citations 8.2 Bibliography 8.3 Primary sources 8.4 Secondary sources 9 External links Personnel[edit] See also: Structural history of the Roman military Population base of the early empire[edit] Roman soldiers on the cast of Trajan's Column in the Victoria and Albert Museum, London. Relief scene of Roman legionaries marching, from the Column of Marcus Aurelius, Rome, Italy, 2nd century AD. At its territorial height, the Roman Empire may have contained between 45 million and 120 million people.[3] Historian Edward Gibbon estimated that the size of the Roman army "most probably formed a standing force of three hundred and seventy-five thousand men"[4] at the Empire's territorial peak in the time of the Roman Emperor Hadrian (117 − 138CE). This estimate probably included only legionary and auxiliary troops of the Roman army.[4] However, Gibbon states that it is "not... easy to define the size of the Roman military with any tolerable accuracy." In the late Imperial period, when vast numbers of foederati were employed by the Romans, Antonio Santosuosso estimated the combined number of men in arms of the two Roman empires numbered closer to 700,000 in total (not all members of a standing army), drawing on data from the Notitia Dignitatum. However, he notes that these figures were probably subject to inflation due to the practice of leaving dead soldiers "on the books" to continue to draw their wages and ration. Furthermore, it is irrespective of whether the troops were raised by the Romans or simply hired by them to fight on their behalf.[5] Recruitment[edit] Initially, Rome's military consisted of an annual citizen levy performing military service as part of their duty to the state. During this period, the Roman army would prosecute seasonal campaigns against largely local adversaries. As the extent of the territories falling under Roman suzerainty expanded, and the size of the city's forces increased, the soldiery of ancient Rome became increasingly professional and salaried. As a consequence, military service at the lower (non-staff) levels became progressively longer-term. Roman military units of the period were largely homogeneous and highly regulated. The army consisted of units of citizen infantry known as legions (Latin: legio) as well as non-legionary allied troops known as auxiliary. The latter were most commonly called upon to provide light infantry or cavalry support. Military service in the later empire continued to be salaried yearly and professionally for Rome's regular troops. However, the trend of employing allied or mercenary troops was expanded such that these troops came to represent a substantial proportion of Rome's forces. At the same time, the uniformity of structure found in Rome's earlier military forces disappeared. The soldiery of the era ranged from lightly armed mounted archers to heavy infantry, in regiments of varying size and quality. This was accompanied by a trend in the late empire of an increasing predominance of cavalry rather than infantry troops, as well as an emphasis on more mobile operations. Military subculture[edit] The British historian Peter Heather describes Roman military culture as being "just like the Marines, but much nastier".[6] The army did not provide much social mobility, and it also took quite some time to complete one's service. The pay was not the best for the time but could be remedied by advance in rank, loot from wars, and additional pay from emperors. Also, the army did provide a guaranteed supply of food (many times soldiers had to pay for food and supplies), doctors, and stability. In the legions of the Republic, discipline was fierce and training harsh, all intended to instill a group cohesion or esprit de corps that could bind the men together into effective fighting units. Unlike opponents such as the Gauls, who were fierce individual warriors, Roman military training concentrated on instilling teamwork and maintaining a level head over individual bravery − troops were to maintain exact formations in battle and "despise wild swinging blows"[7] in favor of sheltering behind one's shield and delivering efficient stabs when an opponent made himself vulnerable. Loyalty was to the Roman state but pride was based in the soldier's unit, to which was attached a military standard − in the case of the legions a legionary eagle. Successful units were awarded accolades that became part of their official name, such as the 20th legion, which became the XX Valeria Victrix (the "Valiant and Victorious 20th"). Of the martial culture of less valued units such as sailors, and light infantry, less is known, but it is doubtful that its training was as intense or its esprit de corps as strong as in the legions. Literacy was highly valued in the Roman military, and literacy rates in the military far exceeded that of the Roman society as a whole.[8] Funding and expenditures[edit] See also: Economics of the Roman army Private funding[edit] Roman coins grew gradually more debased due to the demands placed on the treasury of the Roman state by the military. Although early in its history, troops were expected to provide much of their equipment, eventually, the Roman military became almost entirely funded by the state. Since soldiers of the early Republican armies were also unpaid citizens, the financial burden of the army on the state was minimal. However, since the Roman state did not provide services such as housing, health, education, social security, and public transport that are part and parcel of modern states, the military always represented by far the greatest expenditure of the state.[9] Plunder economy[edit] During the time of expansion in the Republic and early Empire, Roman armies had acted as a source of revenue for the Roman state, plundering conquered territories, displaying the massive wealth in triumphs upon their return and fueling the economy[10] to the extent that historians such as Toynbee and Burke believe that the Roman economy was essentially a plunder economy. Nathan Rosenstein has questioned this assumption, indicating that Rome ran the majority of its campaigns in the 2nd Century BCE at a loss and relied on rare windfalls such as Aemilius Paullus' campaign in the East in 168 BCE to make up the cost of war.[11] Regardless, after the Empire had stopped expanding in the 2nd century CE, this source of revenue dried up; by the end of the 3rd century CE, Rome had "ceased to vanquish."[12] As tax revenue was plagued by corruption and hyperinflation during the Crisis of the Third Century, military expenditures began to become a "crushing burden"[13] on the finances of the Roman state.[14] It now highlighted weaknesses that earlier expansion had disguised. By 440 CE, an imperial law frankly states that the Roman state has the insufficient tax revenue to fund an army of a size required by the demands placed upon it.[15] Several additional factors bloated the military expenditure of the Roman Empire. First, substantial rewards were paid to "barbarian" chieftains for their good conduct in the form of negotiated subsidies and the provision of allied troops.[16] Secondly, the military boosted its numbers, possibly by one third in a single century.[9] Third, the military increasingly relied on a higher ratio of cavalry units in the late Empire, which were many times more expensive to maintain than infantry units.[17] Taxation[edit] As military size and costs increased, new taxes were introduced or existing tax laws reformed in the late Empire to finance it, even though more inhabitants were available within the borders of the late Empire, reducing the per capita costs for an increased standing army was impractical. A large number of the population could not be taxed because they were slaves or held Roman citizenship, both of which exempted them from taxation.[18] Of the remaining, a large number were already impoverished by centuries of warfare and weakened by chronic malnutrition. Still, they had to handle an increasing tax rate[19] and so they often abandoned their lands to survive in a city.[20] Of the Western Empire's taxable population, a larger number than in the East could not be taxed because they were "primitive subsistence peasant[s]"[20] and did not produce a great deal of goods beyond agricultural products. Plunder was still made from suppressing insurgencies within the Empire and on limited incursions into enemy land. Legally, much of it should have returned to the Imperial purse, but these goods were simply kept by the common soldiers, who demanded it of their commanders as a right. Given the low wages and high inflation in the later Empire, the soldiers felt that they had a right to acquire plunder.[21][22] Capabilities[edit] Readiness and disposition[edit] Locations of Roman legions, 80 CE. The military capability of Rome – its preparedness or readiness – was always primarily based upon the maintenance of an active fighting force acting either at or beyond its military frontiers, something that historian Luttwak refers to as a "thin linear perimeter.[23] This is best illustrated by showing the dispositions of the Roman legions, the backbone of the Roman army. (see right). Because of these deployments, the Roman military kept a central strategic reserve after the Social War. Such reserves were only re-established during the late Empire when the army was split into a border defense force and mobile response field units. Power projection[edit] The Roman military was keen on the doctrine of power projection – it frequently removed foreign rulers by force or intimidation and replaced them with puppets. This was facilitated by the maintenance, for at least part of its history, of a series of client states and other subjugate and buffer entities beyond its official borders, although over which Rome extended massive political and military control. On the other hand, this also could mean the payment of immense subsidies to foreign powers[24] and opened the possibility of extortion in case military means were insufficient. Sustainability[edit] The Empire's system of building an extensive and well-maintained road network, as well as its absolute command of the Mediterranean for much of its history, enabled a primitive form of rapid reaction, also stressed in modern military doctrine, although because there was no real strategic reserve, this often entailed the raising of fresh troops or the withdrawing of troops from other parts of the border. However, border troops were usually very capable of handling enemies before they could penetrate far into the Roman hinterland. The Roman military had an extensive logistical supply chain. There was no specialised branch of the military devoted to logistics and transportation, although this was to a great extent carried out by the Roman Navy due to the ease and low costs of transporting goods via sea and river compared to overland.[25] There is archaeological evidence that Roman armies campaigning in Germania were supplied by a logistical supply chain beginning in Italy and Gaul, then transported by sea to the northern coast of Germania, and finally penetrating Germania via barges on inland waterways. Forces were routinely supplied via fixed supply chains, and although Roman armies in enemy territory would often supplement or replace this by foraging for food or purchasing food locally, this was often insufficient for their needs: Heather states that a single legion would have required 13.5 tonnes of food per month, and that it would have proved impossible to source this locally.[26] Policing[edit] For the most part, Roman cities had a civil guard used for maintaining peace. Due to fear of rebellions and other uprisings, they were forbidden to be armed at militia levels. Policing was split between the city guard for low-level affairs and the Roman legions and auxiliary for suppressing higher-level rioting and rebellion. This civil guard created a limited strategic reserve, one that fared poorly in actual warfare. Engineering[edit] See also: Roman military engineering and Greek and Roman artillery The massive earthen ramp at Masada, designed by the Roman army to breach the fortress' walls. The military engineering of Ancient Rome's armed forces was of a scale and frequency far beyond that of any of its contemporaries. Indeed, military engineering was in many ways institutionally endemic in Roman military culture, as demonstrated by the fact that each Roman legionary had as part of his equipment a shovel, alongside his gladius (sword) and pila (spears). Heather writes that "Learning to build, and build quickly, was a standard element of training".[27] This engineering prowess was, however, only evident during the peak of Roman military prowess from the mid-Republic to the mid-Empire. Before the mid-Republic period, there is little evidence of protracted or exceptional military engineering, and in the late Empire likewise, there is little sign of the kind of engineering feats that were regularly carried out in the earlier Empire. Roman military engineering took both routine and extraordinary forms, the former a proactive part of standard military procedure, and the latter of an extraordinary or reactionary nature. Proactive military engineering took the form of the regular construction of fortified camps, in road-building, and the construction of siege engines. The knowledge and experience learned through such routine engineering lent itself readily to any extraordinary engineering projects required by the army, such as the circumvallations constructed at Alesia and the earthen ramp constructed at Masada. This engineering expertise practiced in daily routines also served in the construction of siege equipment such as ballistae, onagers and siege towers, as well as allowing the troops to construct roads, bridges, and fortified camps. All of these led to strategic capabilities, allowing Roman troops to, respectively, assault besieged settlements, move more rapidly to wherever they were needed, cross rivers to reduce march times and surprise enemies, and to camp in relative security even in enemy territory. International stance[edit] Third-century Roman soldiers battling barbarian troops on the Ludovisi Battle sarcophagus (250-260). Rome was established as a nation by making aggressive use of its high military potential. From very early on in its history, it would raise two armies annually to campaign abroad. The Roman military was far from being solely a defense force. For much of its history, it was a tool of aggressive expansion. The Roman army had derived from a militia of main farmers and the gain of new farmlands for the growing population or later retiring soldiers was often one of the campaign's chief objectives. Only in the late Empire did the preservation of control over Rome's territories become the Roman military's primary role. The remaining major powers confronting Rome were the Kingdom of Aksum, Parthia and the Hunnic Empire. Knowledge of China, the Han dynasty at the times of Mani, existed and it is believed that Rome and China swapped embassies about 170 CE.[28] Grand strategy[edit] See also: Strategy of the Roman military In its purest form, the concept of strategy deals solely with military issues. However, Rome is offered by Edward Luttwak and others as an early example of a state that possessed a grand strategy which encompassed the management of the resources of an entire nation in the conduct of warfare. Up to half of the funds raised by the Roman state were spent on its military, and the Romans displayed a strategy that was more complicated than simple knee-jerk strategic or tactical responses to individual threats. Rome's strategy changed over time, implementing different systems to meet different challenges that reflected changing internal priorities. Elements of Rome's strategy included the use of client states, the deterrent of armed response in parallel with manipulative diplomacy, and a fixed system of troop deployments and road networks. Luttwak states that there are "instructive similarities" between Roman and modern military strategy.[29] Rome would rely on brute force and sheer numbers when in doubt. The soldiers were trained to memorize every step in battle, so discipline and order could not break down into chaos. They were largely successful because of this. Campaigns[edit] See also: Campaign history of the Roman military Equipment[edit] Although Roman iron-working was enhanced by a process known as Carburizing, the Romans are not thought to have developed true steel production. From the earliest history of the Roman state to its downfall, Roman arms were therefore uniformly produced from either bronze or, later, iron. As a result, the 1300 years of Roman military technology saw little radical change at the technological level. Within the bounds of classical military technology, however, Roman arms and armor were developed, discarded, and adopted from other peoples based on changing methods of engagement. It included at various times stabbing daggers and swords, stabbing or thrusting swords, long thrusting spears or pikes, lances, light throwing javelins and darts, slings, and bow and arrows. Roman military personal equipment was produced in large numbers to established patterns and used in an established way. It, therefore, varied little in design and quality within each historical period. According to Hugh Elton, Roman equipment gave them "a distinct advantage over their barbarian enemies." Elton, Hugh, 1996, "Warfare in Roman Europe, AD 350-425", who were often, as Germanic tribesmen, completely unarmoured. However, Luttwak points out that whilst the uniform possession of armor gave Rome an advantage, the actual standard of each item of Roman equipment was of no better quality than that used by the majority of its adversaries. In Luttwack, E., "The Grand Strategy of the Roman Empire", JHUP, 1979, Luttwack states that "Roman weapons, far from being universally more advanced, were frequently inferior to those used by enemies. The relatively low quality of Roman weaponry was primarily a function of its large-scale production, and later factors such as governmental price-fixing for certain items, which gave no allowance for quality and incentivized cheap, poor-quality goods. The Roman military readily adopted types of arms and armor that were effectively used against them by their enemies. Initially, Roman troops were armed after Greek and Etruscan models, using large oval shields and long pikes. On encountering the Celts they adopted much Celtic equipment and again later adopted items such as the "gladius" from Iberian peoples. Later in Rome's history, it adopted practices such as arming its cavalry with bows in the Parthian style and even experimented briefly with niche weaponry such as elephants and camel-troops. Besides personal weaponry, the Roman military adopted team weaponry such as the ballista and developed a naval weapon known as the Corvus, a spiked plank used for affixing and boarding enemy ships. Medicine[edit] Need for specialized care[edit] Showing the vast amount of land held by the Romans. The expansion of the Roman Empire was achieved through military force in nearly every case. Roman culture as a whole revolved around its military for both expansion and protection.[30] Geographic areas on the outskirts of the Empire were prone to attack and required heavy military presence. The constant barrage of attacks and the increase of expansion caused casualties. Due to attack there was a need for specialized medical care for these armies in order to keep them in operational status.[31] The specialized form of care however, was not created until the time of Augustus (31BC-14AD).[31] Prior to this there is little information about the care of soldiers. It is assumed soldiers were self-reliant, treating their own wounds and caring for other ailments encountered.[32] They would also turn to civilians for help throughout the villages they would come across. This was considered a custom of the time, and was quite common for households to take in wounded soldiers and tend to them.[32] As time progressed, there was an increase in care for the wounded as hospitals appeared. The idea was held by the Romans that a healed soldier was better than a dead one and a healed veteran was better than a new recruit.[33] General set up of Ancient Roman Military Hospital. Roman hospitals[edit] With the need for soldier health a growing concern, places for the sick to go in the army were starting to show up. Dates ranged from AD 9 to AD 50, but this is when the first evidence of hospitals was seen in archeological remains.[31] These hospitals were specific places for only military members to go to if they were injured or fell ill. Similar hospitals were set up for slaves in areas where slaves were used in large numbers. Military hospitals were permanent structures set up in forts. These buildings had clear patient rooms and were designed to accommodate large numbers of soldiers.[31] The size of these hospitals varied based on their location. Some of the large facilities, such as the hospital in Hod Hill England, was large enough to accommodate roughly 12% of the force within the hospital. In more stable areas such as Inchtuthil in Scotland, there was room for as little as 2% of the force within the hospital. In areas with more conflict, there were larger medical facilities as they saw more casualties.[31] These hospitals were solely designed for the use of the military. If a civilian fell ill or needed surgery they would likely go to the physician's home and stay, not a hospital.[31] Prior to these permanent structures there were tents set up as mobile field hospitals. Soldiers suffering from severe wounds were brought to these for treatment. These were quickly assembled and disassembled as the army moved. The tents served as a precursor for the permanent structured hospitals.[32] These permanent hospitals and mobile treatment centers were a relatively new concept in this time period. Physicians[edit] Doctors serving in the army were considered to be a member of the military. Just like everyone else they would take the military oath and be bound by the military law. They would also start among the lower fighting ranks. Even though they took the military oath and were among the lower ranks it did not mean they would be fighting among the masses.[34] These doctors were not always professionals or career physicians. Oftentimes they were slaves who were forced into that career. The Medici was also a group that treated wounded soldiers on the battlefield. These men were not trained physicians even though they played the role of one. Typically they were soldiers who demonstrated they had knowledge in wound treatment and even simple surgical techniques.[35] These men were used before the actual trained doctors were largely implemented. Physicians got their knowledge from experience and information being passed down from person to person. Likely they never used medical texts, as it was not commonplace even in the civilian field.[35] Generals and Emperors were exceptions, as they would typically have their physician with them. This was a common occurrence as Emperors such as Marcus Aurelius employed famous physicians such as Galen. There were also physicians among the ranks of the Roman soldiers.[33] Distinctions in practice[edit] With any large number of people being in close quarters, there was a constant threat of disease. When one individual in a large group gets sick with a communicable disease, it spreads to others very quickly. This premise remains true even today in the modern military. The Romans recognized the difference between disease and wounds, each requiring separate treatment.[34] Drainage of excess water and waste were common practices in camps as well as the permanent medical structures, which come at a later date. As the medical corps grew in size there was also specialization evolving. Physicians surfaced that specialized in disease, surgery, wound dressing and even veterinary medicine. Veterinary physicians were there to tend to livestock for agricultural purposes as well as combat purposes. The Cavalry was known for their use of horses in combat and scouting purposes.[36] Because of the type of injuries that would have been commonly seen, surgery was a somewhat common occurrence. Tools such as scissors, knives and arrow extractors have been found in remains.[37] In fact, Roman surgery was quite intuitive, in contrast to common thought of ancient surgery. The Roman military surgeons used a cocktail of plants, which created a sedative similar to modern anesthesia. Written documentation also showed surgeons would use oxidation from a metal such as copper and scrape it into wounds, which provided an antibacterial effect; however, this method was most likely more toxic than providing an actual benefit.[38] Doctors had the knowledge to clean their surgical instruments with hot water after each use. Wounds were dressed, and dead tissue was removed when bandages were changed. Honey and cobwebs were items used to cover wounds, and have even been shown today to increase healing.[38] Because of the wide array of cases, it was not uncommon for surgeons to begin their careers in the army to learn their trade. Physicians such as Galen and Dioscorides served in the military. Most major advancements in knowledge and technique came from the military rather than civil practice.[38] Diet[edit] Diet was an issue that is often discussed through this time, as an aspect of medical care. Since our idea of modern technology did not exist, the diet was a simple way for Romans to attain a healthy life. This remains true in the Roman Military as the soldiers required appropriate nutrition in order to function at high activity levels.[39] Because of the number of the people requiring food, there were unique circumstances in the acquisition of food. During a campaign, the soldiers would often forage food from their enemy's land. In fact, as part of the standard kit, Roman soldiers would carry a sickle, which would be used to forage food. They would carry a three-day ration of food in case they were in a situation where foraging was not available.[40] This would largely consist of items such as wheat and barley. During a time of peace, the Roman Army would have had a typical diet consisting of bacon, cheese, vegetables, and beer to drink. Corn is mentioned in their works as well, however; this was a common term that was applied to their use of grain. The Roman use of the term corn is not to be confused with maize, which did not come to Europe until the discovery of the New World. Items such as poultry and fish were also likely part of the standard diet. The soldier was given a ration, which was taken from his pay.[40] This shows that the soldiers were well-fed in times of peace. If the soldiers were well fed, they were healthier and able to maintain a high level of physical activity, as well as to stave off disease. The disease is easier to prevent rather than treat. This idea holds in the event a fort was under siege; certain food items were rationed such as poultry. The reasoning behind this was that poultry was very inexpensive to maintain and in the event of a siege, it did not require a lot of resources to maintain. It was also noted that poultry had benefits for those who were sick. This demonstrates the idea was present that the army needed to maintain the health of its members regardless of circumstances.[40] These discoveries were made while looking at the remains of Roman military sites. By excavating these sites and looking at fecal matter found, scientists were able to determine what was eaten.[41] It is a simple fact that poor diet negatively affects a military's combat readiness. The variety of food found shows the Romans were not focused on just caloric intake, as they knew a variety of food was important to health.[39] Scale[edit] Shows where various Roman Legions were stationed By the time of Trajan (53AD-117AD), the medical corps was well on the way to being an organized machine. At this time, Physicians were attached to nearly every Army and Navy Unit in all the Roman Military. By this time the Army was massive, consisting of twenty-five to thirty legions, each of which contained nearly 6,000 men. Each one included both soldiers and physicians.[38] Despite these massive numbers there was still no formal requirements for being a physician.[34] At this point all physicians were either self-taught or learned their trade through an apprenticeship. Despite this, there was an attempt at organization, as the army did have a medical manual that was passed out to its physicians. The Medici were used on both the front line as emergency care providers and in the rear as the main physicians. The Capsarii were mainly used as the front line care providers and bandages, but also assisted the Medici behind the lines.[38] Source of knowledge[edit] Romans received their medical knowledge largely from the Greeks that came before them. As Rome started to expand, it slowly embraced the Greek culture, causing an influx of medicinal information in Roman society.[42] Because of this influx, it allowed this knowledge to become the foundation of all western medical tradition. The Greek theories were kept alive and their practices continued well into the future.[42] This knowledge was also the foundation used in military medicine since it contained the overarching ideas of their medical knowledge. As time progressed these medical texts would be translated into Arabic and then back into Latin as the flow of information changed. Based on this, we can presume that some of the information in these texts has been lost in translation. Despite this, we are still able to illustrate a clear picture of what military medicine was like during the reign of the Roman Empire. See also[edit] Ancient Rome portal War portal References[edit] Citations[edit] ^ ’’ History of Rome’’, Book 1.4. ^ Williamson, G. (tr.), Josephus, The Jewish War, 1959, p. 378 ^ Estimates range wildly because census data was imprecise and there is some disagreement over how many federated tribes had settled permanently in Roman lands during the Mid to late Empire. ^ a b Gibbon E., The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, Penguin, 1985, para. 65 ^ Santosuosso, p. 188 ^ Heather, P., The Fall of the Roman Empire, Macmillan, 2005, p. 6 ^ Heather, P., The Fall of the Roman Empire, Macmillan, 2005, p.6 ^ Mattingly, David (2008-05-27). AN Imperial Possession: Britain in the Roman Empire, 54 BC - AD 409. Penguin. ISBN 9781101160404. ^ a b Heather, P., The Fall of the Roman Empire, Macmillan, 2005, p. 64 ^ Caesar is said to have spent "huge portions of the wealth he accumulated in his victorious wars... on celebrating Triumphs... [and] on erecting magnificent buildings". Grant, p. 194 ^ Rosenstein (2016), pp. 121-126 ^ Gibbon, p. 199 ^ Santosuosso, p. 214 ^ Jones, p. 1041 ^ Heather, p. 297 ^ Hadas, M, et al., Imperial Rome, in Great Ages of Man: A History of the World's Cultures, New York, Time-Life Books, 1965 ^ Jones, AHM, The Later Roman Empire 284-602, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1964, p.1035 ^ Including the millions of citizens of Rome ^ Edward Gibbon relates that "the fertile... province of Campania...was [w]ithin sixty years of the death of Constantine... granted [an exemption from tax amounting to] three hundred and fifty thousand... acres of desert and uncultivated land" - Gibbon, p. 376 ^ a b Santosuosso A., Soldiers, Emperors and Citizens in the Roman Empire, Westview, 2001, p. 214 ^ Grant, M., The History of Rome, Fabre and Faber, 1993, p. 287 ^ Heather, P., The Fall of the Roman Empire, Macmillan, 2005, p. 29 ^ Luttwak, p. 80 ^ The Grand Byzantine Strategy Edward Luttwak ^ Luttwak notes that Roman troops could march roughly 15 miles per day over long distances, while ships could carry them far more economically and at speeds of 27-81 miles per day. - Luttwak, p. 81 ^ Heather, P., The Fall of the Roman Empire, Macmillan, 2005, p. 55 ^ Heather, P., The Fall of the Roman Empire, Macmillan, 2005, p. 7 ^ Fan Ye, Xiyu Chuan ("Chapter on the Western Regions"), in Hou Han Shu (Official history of the Later Han Dynasty), ch. 88. ^ Luttwak, p. 1 ^ Garrison, F. H. (1921-01-01). Notes on the history of military medicine. Рипол Классик, Ch. 3 Rome. ISBN 9785882286582. ^ a b c d e f Vivian, Nutton (1993). "Roman Medicine: Tradition, Confrontation, Assimilation". Rise and Decline of the Roman World: 49–51. ^ a b c Byrne, Eugene (1910). "Medicine in the Roman Army". The Classical Journal: 267–272. ^ a b Prioreschi, Plinio (1998-01-01). A History of Medicine: Roman medicine. Edwin Mellen Press. pp. 542, 550. ISBN 9781888456035. ^ a b c Nutton, Vivian (1969). "Medicine and the Roman Army: A Further Reconsideration". Medical History. 13: 267–270. doi:10.1017/S0025727300014526. PMC 1033953. PMID 4893625. ^ a b John, Scarborough (1968). "Roman Medicine and the Legions: A Reconsideration". Medical History. 12: 254–261. doi:10.1017/S0025727300013296. PMC 1033827. PMID 4875612. ^ Goldsworthy, Adrian Keith (1998-01-01). The Roman Army at War: 100 BC-AD 200. Clarendon Press. p. 16. ISBN 9780198150909. ^ Milne, John Stewart (1907-01-01). Surgical instruments in Greek and Roman times. At the Clarendon Press. p. 207. ^ a b c d e McCallum, Jack Edward (2008-01-01). Military Medicine: From Ancient Times to the 21st Century. ABC-CLIO. pp. 271–272. ISBN 9781851096930. ^ a b Roth, Jonathan; Roth, Jonathan P. (1999-01-01). The Logistics of the Roman Army at War: 264 B.C. - A.D. 235. BRILL. p. 7. ISBN 9004112715. ^ a b c Davies, R. W. (1971). "The Roman Military Diet". Britannia: 122–130. ^ Kuijper and Turner, W. J and H. (1992). "Diet of a Roman Centurion at Alphen Aan Den Rijn, The Netherlands, in the First Century AD". Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology. 73 (1–4): 200. doi:10.1016/0034-6667(92)90057-n. ^ a b Nutton, Vivian (2004). "Rome and the Transplantation of Greek Medicine". Ancient Medicine: 160. Library resources about Military of ancient Rome Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries Bibliography[edit] Primary sources[edit] Livy, From the Founding of the City on Wikisource (print: Book 1 as The Rise of Rome, Oxford University Press, 1998, ISBN 0-19-282296-9). Polybius: The Rise of the Roman Empire at LacusCurtius (print: Harvard University Press, 1927. (Translation by W. R. Paton). Tacitus: The Annals. Secondary sources[edit] Edward Gibbon: The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire (print: Penguin Books, 1985, ISBN 0-14-043189-6). Peter Connolly, Greece and Rome at War, Greenhill Books, 1998, ISBN 978-1-85367-303-0. Adrian Goldsworthy, In the Name of Rome: The Men Who Won the Roman Empire, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 2003, ISBN 0-297-84666-3. Michael Grant, The History of Rome, Faber and Faber, 1993, ISBN 0-571-11461-X. Peter Heather, The Fall of the Roman Empire: A New History, Macmillan Publishers, 2005, ISBN 0-330-49136-9. Arnold Hugh Martin Jones, The Later Roman Empire, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1964, ISBN 0-8018-3285-3. Robin Lane Fox, The Classical World, Penguin Books, 2005, ISBN 0-14-102141-1 Edward Luttwak, The Grand Strategy of the Roman Empire, Johns Hopkins University Press, ISBN 0-8018-2158-4. Philip Matyszak, The Enemies of Rome, Thames and Hudson, 2004, ISBN 0-500-25124-X. Antonio Santosuosso, Storming the Heavens: Soldiers, Emperors and Civilians in the Roman Empire, Westview Press, 2001, ISBN 0-8133-3523-X. External links[edit] Wikisource has the text of a 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica article about Military of ancient Rome. Roman soldier reenactment v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films v t e Part of a series on the Military of ancient Rome 753 BC – AD 476 Structural history Army Unit types and ranks Legions Auxiliaries Generals Navy Fleets Admirals Campaign history Wars Battles Decorations and punishments Technological history Military engineering Castra Siege engines Triumphal arches Roads Strategy and tactics Infantry tactics Frontiers and fortifications Limes Hadrian's Wall  Ancient Rome portal •  War portal Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Military_of_ancient_Rome&oldid=996029857" Categories: Military of ancient Rome Hidden categories: CS1: Julian–Gregorian uncertainty All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from September 2020 Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Languages Català Čeština 한국어 Lingua Franca Nova Simple English Suomi 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 24 December 2020, at 03:51 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2622 ---- Paradise Lost - Wikipedia Paradise Lost From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search For other uses, see Paradise Lost (disambiguation). Epic poem by John Milton Paradise Lost Title page of the first edition (1667) Author John Milton Cover artist J. B. de Medina Henry Aldrich Country England Language English Genre Epic poetry Christian mythology Publisher Samuel Simmons (original) Publication date 1667 Media type Print Followed by Paradise Regained  Text Paradise Lost at Wikisource Paradise Lost is an epic poem in blank verse by the 17th-century English poet John Milton (1608–1674). The first version, published in 1667, consists of ten books with over ten thousand lines of verse. A second edition followed in 1674, arranged into twelve books (in the manner of Virgil's Aeneid) with minor revisions throughout.[1][2] It is considered to be Milton's major work, and it helped solidify his reputation as one of the greatest English poets of his time.[3] The poem concerns the biblical story of the Fall of Man: the temptation of Adam and Eve by the fallen angel Satan and their expulsion from the Garden of Eden. Milton's purpose, as stated in Book I, is to "justify the ways of God to men."[6] Contents 1 Composition 2 Structure 3 Synopsis 4 Characters 4.1 Satan 4.2 Adam 4.3 Eve 4.4 The Son of God 4.5 God the Father 4.6 Raphael 4.7 Michael 5 Motifs 5.1 Marriage 5.2 Idolatry 6 Interpretation and critique 7 Iconography 8 See also 9 References 9.1 Footnotes 9.2 Bibliography 10 Further reading 11 External links 11.1 Online text 11.2 Other information Composition[edit] Gustave Doré, The Heavenly Hosts, c. 1866, illustration to Paradise Lost. In his introduction to the Penguin edition of Paradise Lost, the Milton scholar John Leonard notes, "John Milton was nearly sixty when he published Paradise Lost in 1667. The biographer John Aubrey (1626–97) tells us that the poem was begun in about 1658 and finished in about 1663. However, parts were almost certainly written earlier, and its roots lie in Milton's earliest youth."[7] Leonard speculates that the English Civil War interrupted Milton's earliest attempts to start his "epic [poem] that would encompass all space and time."[7] Leonard also notes that Milton "did not at first plan to write a biblical epic."[7] Since epics were typically written about heroic kings and queens (and with pagan gods), Milton originally envisioned his epic to be based on a legendary Saxon or British king like the legend of King Arthur.[8][9] Having gone totally blind in 1652, Milton wrote Paradise Lost entirely through dictation with the help of amanuenses and friends. He also wrote the epic poem while he was often ill, suffering from gout, and despite suffering emotionally after the early death of his second wife, Katherine Woodcock, in 1658, and the death of their infant daughter.[10] Structure[edit] In the 1667 version of Paradise Lost, the poem was divided into ten books. However, in the 1672 edition, the text was reorganized into twelve books.[11] In later printing, “Arguments” (brief summaries) were inserted at the beginning of each book.[12] Milton used a number of acrostics in the poem. In Book 9, a verse describing the serpent which tempted Eve to eat the forbidden fruit in the Garden of Eden spells out "SATAN" (9.510), while elsewhere in the same book, Milton spells out "FFAALL" and "FALL". Respectively, these probably represent the double fall of humanity embodied in Adam and Eve, as well as Satan's fall from Heaven.[13] Synopsis[edit] John Martin, Satan Presiding at the Infernal Council, c. 1823–1827 Gustave Doré, Depiction of Satan, the central character of John Milton's Paradise Lost c. 1866 The poem follows the epic tradition of starting in medias res (in the midst of things), the background story being recounted later. Milton's story has two narrative arcs, one about Satan (Lucifer) and the other, Adam and Eve. It begins after Satan and the other fallen angels have been defeated and banished to Hell, or, as it is also called in the poem, Tartarus. In Pandæmonium, the capital city of Hell, Satan employs his rhetorical skill to organise his followers; he is aided by Mammon and Beelzebub. Belial and Moloch are also present. At the end of the debate, Satan volunteers to corrupt the newly created Earth and God's new and most favoured creation, Mankind. He braves the dangers of the Abyss alone, in a manner reminiscent of Odysseus or Aeneas. After an arduous traversal of the Chaos outside Hell, he enters God's new material World, and later the Garden of Eden. At several points in the poem, an Angelic War over Heaven is recounted from different perspectives. Satan's rebellion follows the epic convention of large-scale warfare. The battles between the faithful angels and Satan's forces take place over three days. At the final battle, the Son of God single-handedly defeats the entire legion of angelic rebels and banishes them from Heaven. Following this purge, God creates the World, culminating in his creation of Adam and Eve. While God gave Adam and Eve total freedom and power to rule over all creation, he gave them one explicit command: not to eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil on penalty of death. The story of Adam and Eve's temptation and fall is a fundamentally different, new kind of epic: a domestic one. Adam and Eve are presented as having a romantic and sexual relationship while still being without sin. They have passions and distinct personalities. Satan, disguised in the form of a serpent, successfully tempts Eve to eat from the Tree by preying on her vanity and tricking her with rhetoric. Adam, learning that Eve has sinned, knowingly commits the same sin. He declares to Eve that since she was made from his flesh, they are bound to one another – if she dies, he must also die. In this manner, Milton portrays Adam as an heroic figure, but also as a greater sinner than Eve, as he is aware that what he is doing is wrong. After eating the fruit, Adam and Eve have lustful sex. At first, Adam is convinced that Eve was right in thinking that eating the fruit would be beneficial. However, they soon fall asleep and have terrible nightmares, and after they awake, they experience guilt and shame for the first time. Realizing that they have committed a terrible act against God, they engage in mutual recrimination. Meanwhile, Satan returns triumphantly to Hell, amid the praise of his fellow fallen angels. He tells them about how their scheme worked and Mankind has fallen, giving them complete dominion over Paradise. As he finishes his speech, however, the fallen angels around him become hideous snakes, and soon enough, Satan himself turns into a snake, deprived of limbs and unable to talk. Thus, they share the same punishment, as they shared the same guilt. Eve appeals to Adam for reconciliation of their actions. Her encouragement enables them to approach God, and sue for grace, bowing on supplicant knee, to receive forgiveness. In a vision shown to him by the Archangel Michael, Adam witnesses everything that will happen to Mankind until the Great Flood. Adam is very upset by this vision of the future, so Michael also tells him about Mankind's potential redemption from original sin through Jesus Christ (whom Michael calls "King Messiah"). Adam and Eve are cast out of Eden, and Michael says that Adam may find "a paradise within thee, happier far." Adam and Eve now have a more distant relationship with God, who is omnipresent but invisible (unlike the tangible Father in the Garden of Eden). Characters[edit] Satan[edit] Satan, formerly called Lucifer, is the first major character introduced in the poem. He was once the most beautiful of all angels, and is a tragic figure who famously declares: "Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven." Following his failed rebellion against God, he is cast out from Heaven and condemned to Hell. Satan's desire to rebel against his creator stems from his unwillingness to be subjugated by God and his Son, claiming that angels are "self-begot, self-raised,"[14] and thereby denying God's authority over them as their creator. Satan is deeply arrogant, albeit powerful and charismatic.[citation needed] Satan's persuasive powers are evident throughout the book; not only is he cunning and deceptive, but he is also able to rally the fallen angels to continue in the rebellion after their agonizing defeat in the Angelic War. He argues that God rules as a tyrant and that all the angels ought to rule as gods.[15] Though commonly understood to be the antagonizing force in Paradise Lost, Satan may be best defined as a tragic or Hellenic hero. According to William McCollom, one quality of the classical tragic hero is that he is not perfectly good and that his defeat is caused by a tragic flaw, as Satan causes both the downfall of man and the eternal damnation of his fellow fallen angels despite his dedication to his comrades. In addition, Satan's Hellenic qualities, such as his immense courage and, perhaps, lack of completely defined morals compound his tragic nature.[16] Satan's status as a protagonist in the epic poem is debated. Milton characterizes him as such, but Satan lacks several key traits that would otherwise make him the definitive protagonist in the work. One deciding factor that insinuates his role as the protagonist in the story is that most often a protagonist is heavily characterized and far better described than the other characters, and the way the character is written is meant to make him seem more interesting or special to the reader.[17] For that matter, Satan is both well described and is depicted as being quite versatile in that he is shown as having the capacity to do evil while retaining his characteristic sympathetic qualities and thus it is this complex and relatable nature that makes him a likely candidate for the story's overarching protagonist.[17] By some definitions a protagonist must be able to exist in and of themselves and the secondary characters in the work exist only to further the plot for the protagonist.[18] Because Satan does not exist solely for himself, as without God he would not have a role to play in the story, he may not be viewed as the protagonist because of the continual shifts in perspective and relative importance of characters in each book of the work. Satan's existence in the story involves his rebellion against God and his determination to corrupt the beings he creates in order to perpetuate evil so that there can be a discernible balance and justice for both himself and his fallen angels. Therefore, it is more probable that he exists in order to combat God, making his status as the definitive protagonist of the work relative to each book. Following this logic, Satan may very well be considered as an antagonist in the poem, whereas God could be considered as the protagonist instead. Satan's status as a traditional hero in the work is similarly up to debate as the term "hero" evokes different meanings depending on the time and the person giving the definition and is thus a matter of contention within the text. According to Aristotle, a hero is someone who is "superhuman, godlike, and divine" but is also human.[19] A hero would have to either be a human with God-like powers or the offspring of God. While Milton gives reason to believe that Satan is superhuman, as he was originally an angel, he is anything but human. However, one could argue that Satan's faults make him more human than any other divine being described in Milton's work.[citation needed] Torquato Tasso and Francesco Piccolomini expanded on Aristotle's definition and declared that to be heroic one has to be perfectly or overly virtuous.[20] In this regard, Satan repeatedly demonstrates a lack of virtue throughout the story as he intends to tempt God's creations with evil in order to destroy the good God is trying to create. Therefore, Satan is not a hero according to Tasso and Piccolomini's expanded definition. Satan goes against God's law and therefore becomes corrupt and lacking of virtue and, as Piccolomini warned, "vice may be mistaken for heroic virtue."[19] Satan is very devoted to his cause, although that cause is evil but he strives to spin his sinister aspirations to appear as good ones. Satan achieves this end multiple times throughout the text as he riles up his band of fallen angels during his speech by deliberately telling them to do evil to explain God's hypocrisy and again during his entreaty to Eve. He makes his intentions seem pure and positive even when they are rooted in evil and, according to Steadman, this is the chief reason that readers often mistake Satan as a hero.[20] Although Satan's army inevitably loses the war against God, Satan achieves a position of power and begins his reign in Hell with his band of loyal followers, composed of fallen angels, which is described to be a "third of heaven." Satan's characterization as the leader of a failing cause folds into this as well and is best exemplified through his own quote, "to be weak is to be miserable; Doing or Suffering," as through shared solidarity espoused by empowering rhetoric, Satan riles up his comrades in arms and keeps them focused towards their shared goal.[21] Similar to Milton's republican sentiments of overthrowing the King of England for both better representation and parliamentary power, Satan argues that his shared rebellion with the fallen angels is an effort to "explain the hypocrisy of God," and in doing so, they will be treated with the respect and acknowledgement that they deserve. As scholar Wayne Rebhorn argues, "Satan insists that he and his fellow revolutionaries held their places by right and even leading him to claim that they were self-created and self-sustained" and thus Satan's position in the rebellion is much like that of his own real world creator.[22] Adam[edit] William Blake, The Temptation and Fall of Eve, 1808 (illustration of Milton's Paradise Lost) Adam is the first human being created by God. Finding himself alone, Adam complains and requests a mate from God, who grants his request and creates Eve to be Adam's conjugal companion and spouse. God appraises Adam and Eve most of all his creations, and appoints them to rule over all the creatures of the world and to reside in the Garden of Eden. Adam is more gregarious than Eve, and yearns for her company. His complete infatuation with Eve, while pure of itself, eventually contributes to his deciding to join her in disobedience to God. Unlike the biblical Adam, before Milton's Adam leaves Paradise he is given a glimpse of the future of mankind by the Archangel Michael—including a synopsis of stories from the Old and New Testaments. Eve[edit] Eve is the second human created by God, who takes one of Adam's ribs and shapes it into a female form of Adam. Not the traditional model of a good wife, Milton's Eve is often unwilling to be submissive towards Adam. She is the more intelligent of the two and more curious about external ideas than her husband. Though happy, she longs for knowledge, specifically for self-knowledge. (Her first act in existence is to turn away from Adam to look at and ponder her own reflection.) Eve is beautiful and though she loves Adam she may feel suffocated by his constant presence.[citation needed] In Book IX, she convinces Adam to separate for a time and work in different parts of the Garden. In her solitude, she is tempted by Satan to sin against God by eating of the Tree of Knowledge. Soon thereafter, Adam follows Eve in support of her act. The Son of God[edit] The Son of God is the spirit who will become incarnate as Jesus Christ, though he is never named explicitly because he has not yet entered human form. Milton believed in a subordinationist doctrine of Christology that regarded the Son as secondary to the Father and as God's "great Vice-regent" (5.609). Milton's God in Paradise Lost refers to the Son as "My word, my wisdom, and effectual might" (3.170). The poem is not explicitly anti-trinitarian, but it is consistent with Milton's convictions. The Son is the ultimate hero of the epic and is infinitely powerful—he single-handedly defeats Satan and his followers and drives them into Hell. After their fall, the Son of God tells Adam and Eve about God's judgment: He, the Son, volunteers to journey into the World and become a man himself; then he redeems the Fall of Man through his own sacrificial death and resurrection. In the final scene, a vision of Salvation through the Son of God is revealed to Adam by Michael. Still, the name Jesus of Nazareth, and the details of Jesus' story are not depicted in the poem,[23] though they are alluded to when Michael explains that "Joshua, whom the Gentiles Jesus call," prefigures the Son of God, "his name and office bearing" to "quell / The adversarie Serpent, and bring back [...] long wander[e]d man / Safe to eternal Paradise of rest."[24] God the Father[edit] God the Father is the creator of Heaven, Hell, the world, of everyone and everything there is, through the agency of His Son. Milton presents God as all-powerful and all-knowing, as an infinitely great being who cannot be overthrown by even the great army of angels Satan incites against him. Milton's stated purpose for the poem is to justify the ways of God to men, so he portrays God as often conversing about his plans and his motives for his actions with the Son of God. The poem shows God creating the world in the way Milton believed it was done, that is, God created Heaven, Earth, Hell, and all the creatures that inhabit these separate planes from part of Himself, not out of nothing.[25] Thus, according to Milton, the ultimate authority of God over all things that happen derives from his being the "author" of all creation. Satan tries to justify his rebellion by denying this aspect of God and claiming self-creation, but he admits to himself the truth otherwise, and that God "deserved no such return/ From me, whom He created what I was."[26][27] Raphael[edit] Raphael is the archangel whom God sends to warn Adam of Satan's infiltration of Eden and to warn that Satan will try to curse the pair. Raphael also discusses at length with the curious Adam some details about the creation and about events that transpired in Heaven. Michael[edit] Michael is a mighty archangel who fought for God in the Angelic War. In the first battle, he wounds Satan terribly with a powerful sword that God fashioned to cut through even the substance of angels. After Adam and Eve disobey God by eating from the Tree of Knowledge, God sends the angel Michael to visit them in the garden. Before he escorts them out of Paradise, Michael shows them visions of the future that disclose an outline of Bible stories from that of Cain and Abel in Genesis through the story of Christ Jesus in the New Testament. Motifs[edit] Marriage[edit] Milton first presented Adam and Eve in Book IV with impartiality. The relationship between Adam and Eve is one of "mutual dependence, not a relation of domination or hierarchy." While the author placed Adam above Eve in his intellectual knowledge and, in turn, his relation to God, he granted Eve the benefit of knowledge through experience. Hermine Van Nuis clarifies, that although there was stringency specified for the roles of male and female, Adam and Eve unreservedly accept their designated roles.[28] Rather than viewing these roles as forced upon them, each uses their assignment as an asset in their relationship with each other. These disitinctions can be interpreted as Milton's view on the importance of mutuality between husband and wife. When examining the relationship between Adam and Eve, some critics apply either an Adam-centered or Eve-centered view of hierarchy and importance to God. David Mikics argues, by contrast, these positions "overstate the independence of the characters' stances, and therefore miss the way in which Adam and Eve are entwined with each other."[29] Milton's narrative depicts a relationship where the husband and wife (here, Adam and Eve) depend on each other and, through each other's differences, thrive.[29] Still, there are several instances where Adam communicates directly with God while Eve must go through Adam to God; thus, some have described Adam as her guide.[30] Although Milton does not directly mention divorce, critics posit theories on Milton's view of divorce based upon their inferences from the poem and from his tracts on divorce written earlier in his life. Other works by Milton suggest he viewed marriage as an entity separate from the church. Discussing Paradise Lost, Biberman entertains the idea that "marriage is a contract made by both the man and the woman."[31] These ideas imply Milton may have favored that both man and woman have equal access to marriage and to divorce. Idolatry[edit] Milton's 17th-century contemporaries by and large criticised his ideas and considered him as a radical, mostly because of his Protestant views on politics and religion. One of Milton's most controversial arguments centred on his concept of what is idolatrous, which subject is deeply embedded in Paradise Lost. Milton's first criticism of idolatry focused on the constructing of temples and other buildings to serve as places of worship. In Book XI of Paradise Lost, Adam tries to atone for his sins by offering to build altars to worship God. In response, the angel Michael explains that Adam does not need to build physical objects to experience the presence of God.[32] Joseph Lyle points to this example, explaining "When Milton objects to architecture, it is not a quality inherent in buildings themselves he finds offensive, but rather their tendency to act as convenient loci to which idolatry, over time, will inevitably adhere."[33] Even if the idea is pure in nature, Milton thought it would unavoidably lead to idolatry simply because of the nature of humans. That is, instead of directing their thoughts towards God, humans will turn to erected objects and falsely invest their faith there. While Adam attempts to build an altar to God, critics note Eve is similarly guilty of idolatry, but in a different manner. Harding believes Eve's narcissism and obsession with herself constitutes idolatry.[34] Specifically, Harding claims that "... under the serpent's influence, Eve's idolatry and self-deification foreshadow the errors into which her 'Sons' will stray."[34] Much like Adam, Eve falsely places her faith in herself, the Tree of Knowledge, and to some extent the Serpent, all of which do not compare to the ideal nature of God. Milton made his views on idolatry more explicit with the creation of Pandæmonium and his allusion to Solomon's temple. In the beginning of Paradise Lost and throughout the poem, there are several references to the rise and eventual fall of Solomon's temple. Critics elucidate that "Solomon's temple provides an explicit demonstration of how an artefact moves from its genesis in devotional practice to an idolatrous end."[35] This example, out of the many presented, distinctly conveys Milton's views on the dangers of idolatry. Even if one builds a structure in the name of God, the best of intentions can become immoral in idolatry. Further, critics have drawn parallels between both Pandemonium and Saint Peter's Basilica,[citation needed] and the Pantheon. The majority of these similarities revolve around a structural likeness, but as Lyle explains, they play a greater role. By linking Saint Peter's Basilica and the Pantheon to Pandemonium—an ideally false structure—the two famous buildings take on a false meaning.[36] This comparison best represents Milton's Protestant views, as it rejects both the purely Catholic perspective and the Pagan perspective. In addition to rejecting Catholicism, Milton revolted against the idea of a monarch ruling by divine right. He saw the practice as idolatrous. Barbara Lewalski concludes that the theme of idolatry in Paradise Lost "is an exaggerated version of the idolatry Milton had long associated with the Stuart ideology of divine kingship."[37] In the opinion of Milton, any object, human or non-human, that receives special attention befitting of God, is considered idolatrous. Interpretation and critique[edit] The Creation of Man, engraving from the 1688 edition, by John Baptist Medina. The writer and critic Samuel Johnson wrote that Paradise Lost shows off "[Milton's] peculiar power to astonish" and that "[Milton] seems to have been well acquainted with his own genius, and to know what it was that Nature had bestowed upon him more bountifully than upon others: the power of displaying the vast, illuminating the splendid, enforcing the awful, darkening the gloomy, and aggravating the dreadful."[38] Milton scholar John Leonard interpreted the "impious war" between Heaven and Hell as civil war:[39][page needed] Paradise Lost is, among other things, a poem about civil war. Satan raises 'impious war in Heav'n' (i 43) by leading a third of the angels in revolt against God. The term 'impious war' implies that civil war is impious. But Milton applauded the English people for having the courage to depose and execute King Charles I. In his poem, however, he takes the side of 'Heav'n's awful Monarch' (iv 960). Critics have long wrestled with the question of why an antimonarchist and defender of regicide should have chosen a subject that obliged him to defend monarchical authority. The editors at the Poetry Foundation argue that Milton's criticism of the English monarchy was being directed specifically at the Stuart monarchy and not at the monarchy system in general.[3] In a similar vein, critic and writer C.S. Lewis argued that there was no contradiction in Milton's position in the poem since "Milton believed that God was his 'natural superior' and that Charles Stuart was not." Lewis interpreted the poem as a genuine Christian morality tale.[39][page needed] Other critics, like William Empson, view it as a more ambiguous work, with Milton's complex characterization of Satan playing a large part in that perceived ambiguity.[39][page needed] Empson argued that "Milton deserves credit for making God wicked, since the God of Christianity is 'a wicked God.'" Leonard places Empson's interpretation "in the [Romantic interpretive] tradition of William Blake and Percy Bysshe Shelley."[39][page needed] Blake famously wrote, "The reason Milton wrote in fetters when he wrote of Angels & God, and at liberty when of Devils & Hell, is because he was a true Poet and of the Devil's party without knowing it."[40] This quotation succinctly represents the way in which some 18th- and 19th-century English Romantic poets viewed Milton. Speaking of the complexity of Milton's epic are John Rogers' lectures which try their best to synthesize the "advantages and limitations of a diverse range of interpretive techniques and theoretical concerns in Milton scholarship and criticism."[41] Empson's view is complex. Leonard points out that "Empson never denies that Satan's plan is wicked. What he does deny is that God is innocent of its wickedness: 'Milton steadily drives home that the inmost counsel of God was the Fortunate Fall of man; however wicked Satan's plan may be, it is God's plan too [since God in Paradise Lost is depicted as being both omniscient and omnipotent].'"[39][page needed] Leonard calls Empson's view "a powerful argument"; he notes that this interpretation was challenged by Dennis Danielson in his book Milton's Good God (1982).[39][page needed] Iconography[edit] See also: William Blake's illustrations of Paradise Lost In Sin, Death and the Devil (1792), James Gillray caricatured the political battle between Pitt and Thurlow as a scene from Paradise Lost. Pitt is Death and Thurlow Satan, with Queen Charlotte as Sin in the middle. The first illustrations to accompany the text of Paradise Lost were added to the fourth edition of 1688, with one engraving prefacing each book, of which up to eight of the twelve were by Sir John Baptist Medina, one by Bernard Lens II, and perhaps up to four (including Books I and XII, perhaps the most memorable) by another hand.[42] The engraver was Michael Burghers (given as 'Burgesse' in some sources[43]). By 1730 the same images had been re-engraved on a smaller scale by Paul Fourdrinier. Some of the most notable illustrators of Paradise Lost included William Blake, Gustave Doré and Henry Fuseli. However, the epic's illustrators also include John Martin, Edward Francis Burney, Richard Westall, Francis Hayman, and many others. Outside of book illustrations, the epic has also inspired other visual works by well-known painters like Salvador Dalí who executed a set of ten colour engravings in 1974.[44] Milton's achievement in writing Paradise Lost while blind (he dictated to helpers) inspired loosely biographical paintings by both Fuseli[45] and Eugène Delacroix.[46] See also[edit] Paradise Lost in popular culture John Milton's poetic style Paradise Regained Visio Tnugdali Prince of Darkness (Satan) References[edit] Footnotes[edit] ^ Milton, John (1674). Paradise Lost; A Poem in Twelve Books (II ed.). London: S. Simmons. Retrieved 8 January 2017 – via Internet Archive. ^ "Paradise Lost: Introduction". Dartmouth College. Retrieved 26 March 2010. ^ a b "John Milton". Poetry Foundation. 19 April 2018. ^ John Milton. Paradise Lost, Book I, l. 26. 1667. Hosted by Dartmouth. Accessed 13 December 2013. ^ Milton 1674 harvnb error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFMilton1674 (help), 1:26. ^ Milton's original line read "...justifie the wayes of God to men."[4][5] ^ a b c Leonard 2000, p. xii. ^ Leonard 2000, p. xiii. ^ Broadbent 1972, p. 54. ^ Abrahm, M.H., Stephen Greenblatt, Eds. The Norton Anthology of English Literature. New York: Norton, 2000. ^ Forsythe, Neil (2002). The Satanic Epic. Princeton University. ^ Teskey, Gordon (2005). "Introduction". Paradise Lost: A Norton Critical Edition. New York: Norton. pp. xxvii-xxviii. ISBN 978-0393924282. ^ History, Stephanie Pappas-Live Science Contributor 2019-09-16T18:16:12Z. "Secret Message Discovered in Milton's Epic 'Paradise Lost'". livescience.com. Retrieved 17 September 2019. ^ Milton 1674 harvnb error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFMilton1674 (help), 5:860. ^ Milton 1674 harvnb error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFMilton1674 (help), 5:794–802. ^ McCollom, William G. ―The Downfall of the Tragic Hero.‖ College English 19.2 (1957): 51- 56. ^ a b (Taha, Ibrahim. "Heroism In Literature." The American Journal of Semiotics18.1/4 (2002): 107-26. Philosophy Document Center. Web. 12 Nov. 2014) ^ Taha, Ibrahim. "Heroism In Literature." The American Journal of Semiotics18.1/4 (2002): 107-26. Philosophy Document Center. Web. 12 Nov. 2014 ^ a b Steadman, John M. "Heroic Virtue and the Divine Image in Paradise Lost. "Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 22.1/2 (1959): pp. 89 ^ a b Steadman, John M. "Heroic Virtue and the Divine Image in Paradise Lost. "Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 22.1/2 (1959): pp. 90 ^ Milton, John. Paradise Lost. The Norton Anthology of English Literature. 9th ed. Vol. B. New York ; London: W.W. Norton, 2012. 1950. Print. ^ Rebhorn, Wayne A. "The Humanist Tradition and Milton's Satan: The Conservative as Revolutionary." SEL: Studies in English Literature 1500–1900, Vol. 13, No. 1, The English Renaissance (Winter 1973), pp. 81-93. Print. ^ Marshall 1961, p. 17 ^ Milton 1674 harvnb error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFMilton1674 (help), 12:310-314 ^ Lehnhof 2008, p. 15 harvnb error: no target: CITEREFLehnhof2008 (help). ^ Milton 1674 harvnb error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFMilton1674 (help), 4:42–43. ^ Lehnhof 2008, p. 24 harvnb error: no target: CITEREFLehnhof2008 (help). ^ Van Nuis 2000, p. 50. ^ a b Mikics 2004, p. 22 harvnb error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFMikics2004 (help). ^ Mikics, David (24 February 2004). "Miltonic Marriage and the Challenge to History in Paradise Lost". Texas Studies in Literature and Language. 46 (1): 20–48. doi:10.1353/tsl.2004.0005. S2CID 161371845 – via Project MUSE. ^ Biberman 1999, p. 137. ^ Milton 1674 harvnb error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFMilton1674 (help), Book 11. ^ Lyle 2000, p. 139. ^ a b Harding 2007, p. 163. ^ Lyle 2000, p. 140. ^ Lyle 2000, p. 147. ^ Lewalski 2003, p. 223. ^ Johnson, Samuel. Lives of the English Poets. New York: Octagon, 1967. ^ a b c d e f Leonard, John. "Introduction." Paradise Lost. New York: Penguin, 2000. ^ Blake, William. The Marriage of Heaven and Hell. 1793. ^ "John Rogers Milton". Yale. 19 February 2020. ^ Illustrating Paradise Lost Archived 1 February 2008 at the Wayback Machine from Christ's College, Cambridge, has all twelve on line. See Medina's article for more on the authorship, and all the illustrations, which are also in Commons. ^ William Bridges Hunter (1978). A Milton encyclopedia. Bucknell University Press. p. 58. ISBN 978-0-8387-1837-7. ^ Lockport Street Gallery. Retrieved on 2013-12-13. ^ Art Institute of Chicago. Retrieved on 2013-12-13. ^ WikiPaintings. Retrieved on 2013-12-13. Bibliography[edit] Anderson, G (January 2000), "The Fall of Satan in the Thought of St. Ephrem and John Milton", Hugoye: Journal of Syriac Studies, 3 (1), archived from the original on 26 February 2008 Biberman, M (January 1999), "Milton, Marriage, and a Woman's Right to Divorce", SEL: Studies in English Literature 1500–1900, 39 (1): 131–153, doi:10.2307/1556309, JSTOR 1556309 Black, J, ed. (March 2007), "Paradise Lost", The Broadview Anthology of British Literature, A (Concise ed.), Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press, pp. 998–1061, ISBN 978-1-55111-868-0, OCLC 75811389 Blake, W. (1793), The Marriage of Heaven and Hell , London . Blayney, B, ed. (1769), The King James Bible , Oxford: Oxford University Press Bradford, R (July 1992), Paradise Lost (1st ed.), Philadelphia: Open University Press, ISBN 978-0-335-09982-5, OCLC 25050319 Broadbent, John (1972), Paradise Lost: Introduction, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 9780521096393 Butler, G (February 1998), "Giants and Fallen Angels in Dante and Milton: The Commedia and the Gigantomachy in Paradise Lost", Modern Philosophy, 95 (3): 352–363 Carter, R. and McRae, J. (2001). The Routledge History of Literature in English: Britain and Ireland. 2 ed. Oxon: Routledge. Carey, J; Fowler, A (1971), The Poems of John Milton, London Doerksen, D (December 1997), "Let There Be Peace': Eve as Redemptive Peacemaker in Paradise Lost, Book X", Milton Quarterly, 32 (4): 124–130, doi:10.1111/j.1094-348X.1997.tb00499.x, S2CID 162488440 Eliot, T.S. (1957), On Poetry and Poets, London: Faber and Faber Eliot, T. S. (1932), "Dante", Selected Essays, New York: Faber and Faber, OCLC 70714546 . Empson, W (1965), Milton's God (Revised ed.), London John Milton: A Short Introduction (2002 ed., paperback by Roy C. Flannagan, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, ISBN 978-0-631-22620-8; 2008 ed., ebook by Roy Flannagan, Massachusetts: Wiley-Blackwell, ISBN 978-0-470-69287-5) Forsyth, N (2003), The Satanic Epic, Princeton: Princeton University Press, ISBN 978-0-691-11339-5 Frye, N (1965), The Return of Eden: Five Essays on Milton's Epics, Toronto: University of Toronto Press Harding, P (January 2007), "Milton's Serpent and the Birth of Pagan Error", SEL: Studies in English Literature 1500–1900, 47 (1): 161–177, doi:10.1353/sel.2007.0003, S2CID 161758649 Hill, G (1905), Lynch, Jack (ed.), Samuel Johnson: The Lives of the English Poets, 3 vols, Oxford: Clarendon, OCLC 69137084, archived from the original on 18 February 2012, retrieved 22 December 2006 Kermode, F, ed. (1960), The Living Milton: Essays by Various Hands, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, ISBN 0-7100-1666-2, OCLC 17518893 Kerrigan, W, ed. (2007), The Complete Poetry and Essential Prose of John Milton, New York: Random House, ISBN 978-0-679-64253-4, OCLC 81940956 Lehnhof, K. (Summer 2004), "Paradise Lost and the Concept of Creation", South Central Review, 21 (2): 15–41, doi:10.1353/scr.2004.0021, S2CID 13244028 Leonard, John (2000), "Introduction", in Milton, John (ed.), Paradise Lost, New York: Penguin, ISBN 9780140424393 Lewalski, B. (January 2003), "Milton and Idolatry", SEL: Studies in English Literature 1500–1900, 43 (1): 213–232, doi:10.1353/sel.2003.0008, S2CID 170082234 Lewis, C.S. (1942), A Preface to Paradise Lost, London: Oxford University Press, OCLC 822692 Lyle, J (January 2000), "Architecture and Idolatry in Paradise Lost", SEL: Studies in English Literature 1500–1900, 40 (1): 139–155, doi:10.2307/1556158, JSTOR 1556158 Marshall, W. H. (January 1961), "Paradise Lost: Felix Culpa and the Problem of Structure", Modern Language Notes, 76 (1): 15–20, doi:10.2307/3040476, JSTOR 3040476 Mikics, D (2004), "Miltonic Marriage and the Challenge to History in Paradise Lost", Texas Studies in Literature and Language, 46 (1): 20–48, doi:10.1353/tsl.2004.0005, S2CID 161371845 Miller, T.C., ed. (1997), The Critical Response to John Milton's "Paradise Lost", Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group, ISBN 978-0-313-28926-2, OCLC 35762631 Milton, J (1674), Paradise Lost  (2nd ed.), London: S. Simmons Rajan, B (1947), Paradise Lost and the Seventeenth Century Reader, London: Chatto & Windus, OCLC 62931344 Ricks, C.B. (1963), Milton's Grand Style, Oxford: Clarendon Press, OCLC 254429 Stone, J.W. (May 1997), ""Man's effeminate s(lack)ness:" Androgyny and the Divided Unity of Adam and Eve", Milton Quarterly, 31 (2): 33–42, doi:10.1111/j.1094-348X.1997.tb00491.x, S2CID 163023289 Van Nuis, H (May 2000), "Animated Eve Confronting Her Animus: A Jungian Approach to the Division of Labor Debate in Paradise Lost", Milton Quarterly, 34 (2): 48–56, doi:10.1111/j.1094-348X.2000.tb00619.x Walker, Julia M. (1998), Medusa's Mirrors: Spenser, Shakespeare, Milton, and the Metamorphosis of the Female Self, University of Delaware Press, ISBN 978-0-87413-625-8 Wheat, L (2008), Philip Pullman's His dark materials—a multiple allegory : attacking religious superstition in The lion, the witch, and the wardrobe and Paradise lost, Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books, ISBN 978-1-59102-589-4, OCLC 152580912 Further reading[edit] Patrides, C. A. Approaches to Paradise Lost: The York Tercentenary Lectures (University of Toronto, 1968) ISBN 0-8020-1577-8 Ryan J. Stark, "Paradise Lost as Incomplete Argument," 1650—1850: Aesthetics, Ideas, and Inquiries in the Early Modern Era (2011): 3–18. External links[edit] Paradise Lostat Wikipedia's sister projects Media from Wikimedia Commons Quotations from Wikiquote Texts from Wikisource Data from Wikidata Gustave Doré Paradise Lost Illustrations from the University at Buffalo Libraries Major Online Resources on Paradise Lost Paradise Lost public domain audiobook at LibriVox Online text[edit] Paradise Lost XHTML version at Dartmouth's Milton Reading Room Project Gutenberg text version 1 Project Gutenberg text version 2 Paradise Lost PDF/Ebook version with layout and fonts inspired by 17th century publications. paradiselost.org has the original poetry side-by-side with a translation to plain (prosaic) English Other information[edit] darkness visible – comprehensive site for students and others new to Milton: contexts, plot and character summaries, reading suggestions, critical history, gallery of illustrations of Paradise Lost, and much more. By students at Milton's Cambridge college, Christ's College. Selected bibliography at the Milton Reading Room – includes background, biography, criticism. Paradise Lost learning guide, quotes, close readings, thematic analyses, character analyses, teacher resources v t e John Milton Topics Poetic style Reception history Religion Politics Early life Relationships Poetry Poems 1645 On the Morning of Christ's Nativity Upon the Circumcision The Passion Arcades Comus "Lycidas" "L'Allegro" "Il Penseroso" Paradise Lost Paradise Regained Samson Agonistes Poems 1673 Antiprelatical tracts Of Reformation Of Prelatical Episcopacy Animadversions The Reason of Church-Government Apology for Smectymnuus Divorce tracts Doctrine and Discipline of Divorce Judgement of Martin Bucer Concerning Divorce Tetrachordon Colasterion Political tracts Areopagitica The Tenure of Kings and Magistrates Eikonoklastes Defensio pro Populo Anglicano Defensio Secunda A Treatise of Civil Power The Ready and Easy Way Other writings Of Education The History of Britain Of True Religion Individual sonnets "When I Consider How My Light is Spent" "On the Late Massacre in Piedmont" "Methought I Saw my Late Espoused Saint" Disputed De Doctrina Christiana Related John Milton (father) Edward Phillips (nephew) John Phillips (nephew) Milton: A Poem in Two Books (1804–1810) Neo-Miltonic syllabics v t e John Milton's Paradise Lost Source Fall of man Adaptations William Blake's illustrations of Paradise Lost (art) Paradise Lost (opera) Related Paradise Lost in popular culture Paradise Regained (1671 poem) Albums Black Aria (1992) Damnation and a Day (2003) Rattle That Lock (2015) Characters Satan Prince of Darkness Adam Eve Son of God God the Father Raphael Michael Places Pandæmonium v t e Adam and Eve Source Genesis creation narrative in the Book of Genesis Adam Eve Offspring Cain and Abel Luluwa Seth Awan Azura Related theology Fall of man Original sin Garden of Eden Tree of the knowledge of good and evil Serpents in the Bible Forbidden fruit Apple Fig leaf Figs in the Bible Adam's ale Adamic language Camael Protevangelium Rosh Hashanah Seed of the woman Shamsiel Lilith Tree of life Allegorical interpretations of Genesis Other cultures Adam–God doctrine Adam and Eve (LDS Church) Adam in Islam Adam in rabbinic literature Al-A'raf Book of Moses Endowment Manu (Hinduism) Mashya and Mashyana Serpent seed Tree of Jiva and Atman Tree of life (Quran) Our Lady of Endor Coven Television "Probe 7, Over and Out" (1963) Film Mama's Affair (1921) Good Morning, Eve! (1934) The Broken Jug (1937) The Original Sin (1948) The Private Lives of Adam and Eve (1960) El pecado de Adán y Eva (1969) La Biblia en pasta (1984) The Annunciation (1984) Adipapam (1988) Adam (1992) Babs (2000) The Last Eve (2005) Year One (2009) The Tragedy of Man (2011) Adam and Dog (2011) Tropico (2013) Plays Le Jeu d'Adam (12th century) The Broken Jug (1808) The Tragedy of Man (1861) The Creation of the World and Other Business (1972) Musicals The Apple Tree (1966) Dude (1972) Up from Paradise (1973) Children of Eden (1991) Compositions The Creation (1798) structure La mort d'Adam (1809) Ève (1875) Genesis Suite (1945) Lilith (2001) Literature Apocalypse of Adam Book of Moses Book of Abraham Books of Adam Book of the Penitence of Adam Cave of Treasures "El y Ella" Genesis A and Genesis B Harrowing of Hell Life of Adam and Eve Testament of Adam Testimony of Truth (3rd century) Conflict of Adam and Eve with Satan (6th century) "Old Saxon Genesis" (9th century) "Adam lay ybounden" (15th century) Paradise Lost (1667) Le Dernier Homme (1805) Extracts from Adam's Diary (1904) Eve's Diary (1905) The Book of Genesis (2009) The Rise and Fall of Adam and Eve (2017) Art Bernward Doors (1015) Tapestry of Creation (11th century) Expulsion from the Garden of Eden (1425) Vienna Diptych (15th century) The Last Judgment (1482) The Garden of Earthly Delights (1504) Adam and Eve (1507) Paradise and Hell (1510) The Creation of Adam (1512) The Haywain Triptych (1516) Eve, the Serpent and Death (1510s or 1520s) Adam and Eve (1528) The Fall of Man (1550) The Garden of Eden with the Fall of Man (1617) The Fall of Man (1628) The Four Seasons (1660s) The Koren Picture-Bible (1692–1696) Paradise Lost (19th century) Expulsion from the Garden of Eden (1828) The First Mourning (1888) Adam and Eve (1905) Eve (1931) Adam and Eve (1932) The Serpent Chooses Adam and Eve (1958) Songs "Dese Bones G'wine Rise Again" "Adam-ondi-Ahman" (1835) "Forbidden Fruit" (1915) "The Garden of Eden" (1956) "Let's Give Adam and Eve Another Chance" (1970) "Man Gave Names to All the Animals" (1979) Albums The Cainian Chronicle (1996) Visions of Eden (2006) Snakes for the Divine (2010) Geography Adam-ondi-Ahman Tomb of Eve Biology Mitochondrial Eve Y-chromosomal Adam The Real Eve Story within a story Doraemon: Nobita's Diary on the Creation of the World Island of Love The Visitors Games Demon: The Fallen (2002) Other Pre-Adamite Generations of Adam Cave of the Patriarchs "In-A-Gadda-Da-Leela" "Simpsons Bible Stories" Second Time Lucky Adam and Eve cylinder seal Timeline of Genesis patriarchs Genealogies of Genesis Carnal knowledge Legend of the Rood Ystorya Adaf Ransom theory of atonement Authority control BNE: XX2219050 BNF: cb11939532n (data) GND: 4114602-5 LCCN: n85227530 MBW work: b899e890-fbcb-44bb-b7bc-fe2c2688d714 NLA: 35354390 NLP: A15161080 SUDOC: 027329607 VIAF: 314808661 WorldCat Identities (via VIAF): 314808661 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Paradise_Lost&oldid=990730454" Categories: 1667 books 1667 poems 1674 books Christian poetry Epic poems in English Poetry by John Milton Biblical paraphrases Biblical poetry Garden of Eden Cultural depictions of Adam and Eve Cosmogony God in fiction The Devil in fiction Lucifer Beelzebub Hidden categories: Harv and Sfn multiple-target errors Harv and Sfn no-target errors Webarchive template wayback links Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata Use British English from May 2012 Articles that link to Wikisource All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from February 2016 Articles with unsourced statements from October 2020 Articles with unsourced statements from March 2008 Wikipedia articles needing page number citations from March 2016 Pages using Sister project links with hidden wikidata Articles with LibriVox links Use dmy dates from May 2012 Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with MusicBrainz work identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLP identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WorldCat-VIAF identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikiquote Wikisource Languages العربية বাংলা Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ Български Brezhoneg Català Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français Frysk Galego 한국어 Հայերեն हिन्दी Hrvatski Bahasa Indonesia Íslenska Italiano עברית ქართული Latina Magyar മലയാളം مصرى Nederlands नेपाली 日本語 Norsk bokmål Norsk nynorsk ਪੰਜਾਬੀ Polski Português Română Русский Simple English Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska தமிழ் తెలుగు ไทย Тоҷикӣ Türkçe Українська Tiếng Việt 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 26 November 2020, at 05:15 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2623 ---- Pedanius Dioscorides - Wikipedia Pedanius Dioscorides From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Greco-Roman physician and pharmacologist (AD c.40-90) This article is about the physician, pharmacologist and botanist. For the philosopher, see Dioscorides (Stoic). For the admiral, see Dioscurides (nephew of Antigonus I). Pedanius Dioscorides Dioscorides receives a mandrake root, an illumination from the 6th century Greek Juliana Anicia Codex Born c. 40 AD[1] Anazarbus, Cilicia, Asia Minor Died c. 90 AD Other names Dioscurides Occupation Army physician, pharmacologist, botanist Known for De Materia Medica Pedanius Dioscorides (Greek: Πεδάνιος Διοσκουρίδης, Pedánios Dioskourídēs; c. 40–90 AD) was a Greek physician, pharmacologist, botanist, and author of De materia medica (Περὶ ὕλης ἰατρικῆς, On Medical Material) —a 5-volume Greek encyclopedia about herbal medicine and related medicinal substances (a pharmacopeia), that was widely read for more than 1,500 years. He was employed as a physician in the Roman army. Contents 1 Life 2 De Materia Medica 3 Images 4 Translations 5 In literature 6 See also 7 Notes 8 References 9 Sources 10 External links Life[edit] A native of Anazarbus, Cilicia, Asia Minor, Dioscorides likely studied medicine nearby at the school in Tarsus, which had a pharmacological emphasis, and he dedicated his medical books to Laecanius Arius, a medical practitioner there.[a][3][4] Though he says he served in the Roman army, his pharmacopeia refers almost solely to plants found in the Greek-speaking eastern Mediterranean, making it unlikely that he served in campaigns (or traveled) outside that region.[5] The name Pedanius is Roman, suggesting that an aristocrat of that name sponsored him to become a Roman citizen.[6] De Materia Medica[edit] Blackberry from the 6th-century Vienna Dioscurides manuscript Main article: De Materia Medica Between AD 50 and 70 [7] Dioscorides wrote a five-volume book in his native Greek, Περὶ ὕλης ἰατρικῆς (Perì hylēs íatrikēs), known in Western Europe more often by its Latin title De Materia Medica ("On Medical Material"), which became the precursor to all modern pharmacopeias.[8] Cover of an early printed version of De Materia Medica, Lyon, 1554 In contrast to many classical authors, Dioscorides' works were not "rediscovered" in the Renaissance, because his book had never left circulation; indeed, with regard to Western materia medica through the early modern period, Dioscorides' text eclipsed the Hippocratic corpus.[9] In the medieval period, De Materia Medica was circulated in Greek, as well as Latin and Arabic translation.[10] While being reproduced in manuscript form through the centuries, it was often supplemented with commentary and minor additions from Arabic and Indian sources. Ibn al-Baitar's commentary on Dioscorides' Materia Medica, entitled Tafsīr Kitāb Diāsqūrīdūs : تفسير كتاب دياسقوريدوس, has been used by scholars to identify many of the flora mentioned by Dioscorides.[11] A number of illustrated manuscripts of De Materia Medica survive. The most famous of these is the lavishly illustrated Vienna Dioscurides, produced in Constantinople in 512/513 AD. Densely illustrated Arabic copies survive from the 12th and 13th centuries, while Greek manuscripts survive today in the monasteries of Mount Athos.[12] De Materia Medica is the prime historical source of information about the medicines used by the Greeks, Romans, and other cultures of antiquity. The work also records the Dacian,[13] Thracian,[14] Roman, ancient Egyptian and North African (Carthaginian) names for some plants, which otherwise would have been lost. The work presents about 600 plants in all,[15] although the descriptions are sometimes obscurely phrased, leading to comments such as: "Numerous individuals from the Middle Ages on have struggled with the identity of the recondite kinds",[16] while some of the botanical identifications of Dioscorides' plants remain merely guesses. De Materia Medica formed the core of the European pharmacopeia through the 19th century, suggesting that "the timelessness of Dioscorides' work resulted from an empirical tradition based on trial and error; that it worked for generation after generation despite social and cultural changes and changes in medical theory".[9] The plant genus Dioscorea, which includes the yam, was named after him by Linnaeus.[17] Images[edit] Dioscorides as depicted in a 1240 Arabic edition of De Materia Medica De Materia Medica in Arabic, Spain, 12th-13th century Cumin and dill from an Arabic book of simples (ca. 1334) after Dioscorides (British Museum) Byzantine De Materia Medica, 15th century Later representation of Dioscorides Translations[edit] De Materia Medica: Being an Herbal with many other medicinal materials, Englished by Tess Anne Osbaldeston, year 2000, based on the translation of John Goodyer of year 1655 (see below). (Publisher Ibidis Press: Johannesburg). De Materia Medica, translated by Lily Y. Beck (2005). (Publisher Hildesheim: Olms-Weidmann). The Greek Herbal of Dioscorides... Englished by John Goodyer A. D. 1655, edited by R.T. Gunter (1933). De Materia medica : libri V Eiusdem de Venenis Libri duo. Interprete Iano Antonio Saraceno Lugdunaeo, Medico, translated by Janus Antonius Saracenus (1598). In literature[edit] In Voltaire's Candide, the title character's injuries received at the hands of the Bulgarian army, into which he had been conscripted, are healed using "emollients taught by Dioscorides." See also[edit] Materia medica Notes[edit] ^ The dedication, translated by Scarborough and Nutton,[2] began "At your insistence I have assembled my material into five books, and I dedicate my compendium to you in fulfilment of a debt of gratitude for your sentiments towards me".[3] References[edit] ^ The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica. (2013, September 27). Pedanius Dioscorides. Retrieved July 04, 2020, from https://www.britannica.com/biography/Pedanius-Dioscorides ^ Scarborough and Nutton, 1982 ^ a b Stobart, Anne (2014). Critical Approaches to the History of Western Herbal Medicine: From Classical Antiquity to the Early Modern Period. A&C Black. p. 193. ISBN 978-1-4411-8418-4. ^ Borzelleca, Joseph F.; Lane, Richard W. (2008). "The Art, the Science, and the Seduction of Toxicology: an Evolutionary Development". In Hayes, Andrew Wallace (ed.). Principles and methods of toxicology (5th ed.). Taylor & Francis. p. 13. ^ Nutton, Vivian. Ancient medicine. Routledge, 2012. p. 178 ^ Tobyn, Graeme; Denham, Alison; Whitelegg, Midge (2016). The Western Herbal Tradition: 2000 Years of Medicinal Plant Knowledge (illustrated ed.). Singing Dragon. p. 4. ISBN 9780857012593. ^ "Greek Medicine". National Institutes of Health, USA. 16 September 2002. Retrieved 1 July 2013. ^ Rooney, Anne (2012). The History of Medicine. The Rosen Publishing Group. p. 121. ISBN 9781448873708. ^ a b De Vos (2010) "European Materia Medica in Historical Texts: Longevity of a Tradition and Implications for Future Use", Journal of Ethnopharmacology 132(1):28–47 ^ Some detail about medieval manuscripts of De Materia Medica at pages xxix–xxxi in Introduction to Dioscorides Materia Medica by TA Osbaldeston, year 2000. ^ Zohar Amar, Agricultural Produce in the Land of Israel in the Middle Ages (Hebrew title: גידולי ארץ-ישראל בימי הביניים), Ben-Zvi Institute: Jerusalem 2000, p. 270 ISBN 965-217-174-3 (Hebrew); Tafsīr Kitāb Diāsqūrīdūs - commentaire de la “Materia Medica” de Dioscoride de Abū Muḥammad ʻAbdallāh ibn Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad ibn al-Bayṭār de Malaga (ed. Ibrahim Ben Mrad), Beirut 1989 (Arabic title: تفسير كتاب دياسقوريدوس) ^ Selin, Helaine (2008). Encyclopaedia of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine in Non-Western Cultures. Springer. p. 1077. ISBN 9781402045592. ^ Nutton, Vivian (2004). Ancient Medicine. Routledge. . Page 177. ^ Murray, J. (1884). The Academy. Alexander and Shephrard. . Page 68. ^ Krebs, Robert E.; Krebs, Carolyn A. (2003). Groundbreaking Scientific Experiments, Inventions, and Discoveries of the Ancient World. Greenwood Publishing Group. . Pages 75–76. ^ Isely, Duane (1994). One hundred and one botanists. Iowa State University Press. ^ Austin, Daniel F. (2004). Florida Ethnobotany (illustrated ed.). CRC Press. p. 267. ISBN 9780203491881. Sources[edit] Allbutt, T. Clifford (1921). Greek medicine in Rome. London: Macmillan. ISBN 1-57898-631-1. Bruins: Codex Constantinopolitanus: Palatii Veteris NO. 1 [3 volume set] Part 1: Reproduction of the Manuscript; Part 2: Greek Text; Part 3: Translation and Commentary Bruins, E. M. (Ed.) Forbes, Andrew; Henley, Daniel; Henley, David (2013). 'Pedanius Dioscorides' in: Health and Well Being: A Medieval Guide. Chiang Mai: Cognoscenti Books. Hamilton, J. S. (1986). "Scribonius Largus on the medical profession". Bulletin of the History of Medicine. 60 (2): 209–216. PMID 3521772. Lazris, J.; Stavros, V. (2013). "L'image paradigmatique: des Schémas anatomiques d'Aristote au De materia medica de Dioscoride". Pallas. 93 (93): 131–164. doi:10.4000/pallas.1400. Lazris, J.; Stavros, V. "The medical illustration in Antiquity". Reality Through Image: 18–23 (abstract). Riddle, John (1980). "Dioscorides" (PDF). Catalogus Translationum et Commentariorum. 4: 1. Retrieved 25 August 2015. Riddle, John M. (1985). Dioscorides on pharmacy and medicine. Austin: University of Texas Press. ISBN 0-292-71544-7. Sadek, M. M. (1983). The Arabic materia medica of Dioscorides. Québec, Canada: Les Éditions du sphinx. ISBN 2-920123-02-5. Scarborough, J.; Nutton, V. (1982). "The Preface of Dioscorides' Materia Medica: introduction, translation, and commentary". Transactions & Studies of the College of Physicians of Philadelphia. 4 (3): 187–227. PMID 6753260. External links[edit] Wikimedia Commons has media related to Pedanius Dioscorides. Wikisource has original works written by or about: Pedanius Dioscorides Works by Dr. Dioscorides at Project Gutenberg Works by or about Pedanius Dioscorides at Internet Archive Works by Dioscorides Dioscorides Material Medica, in English—the full book downloadable in PDF fileformat. "Dioscurides Neapolitanus: Codex ex Vindobonensis Graecus 1" (in Italian and Latin). Biblioteca Nazionale di Napoli. Retrieved 18 February 2010. "Medic: Catalogue des textes en ligne: Dioscoride/Dioscodirides, Pedanius" (pdf) (in French and Latin). Bibliothèque interuniversitaire de médecine et d'odontologie, Université Paris Descartes. Retrieved 18 February 2010. Pedacio Dioscorides anazarbeo: Acerca de la materia medicinal y de los venenos mortiferos, Antwerp, 1555, digitized at Biblioteca Digital Hispánica, Biblioteca Nacional de España Les VI livres de Ped. Diosc. de la materie medicinale, Lyon (1559), French edition The 1500th Anniversary (512-2012) of the Juliana Anicia Codex: An Illustrated Dioscoridean Recension. Jules Janick and Kim E. Hummer. Chronica horticulturae. 52(3) 2012 pp. 9-15 v t e Ancient anaesthesia Plants / animals Aconitum (aconite) Atropa belladonna (belladonna) Cannabis medical use Castoreum Coca Conium (hemlock) Datura innoxia (thorn-apple) Datura metel (devil's trumpet) Hyoscyamus niger (henbane) Lactucarium Mandragora officinarum (mandrake) Opium Saussurea (saw-wort) Willow People Abulcasis Avenzoar Avicenna Celsus Dioscorides Galen Hippocrates Rhazes Sabuncuoğlu Sushrutha Theophrastus Zhang Compounds Aconitine Atropine Cocaine Coniine Hyoscine Δ9-THC Hyoscyamine Morphine Salicylate v t e Natural history Pioneering naturalists Classical antiquity Aristotle (History of Animals) Theophrastus (Historia Plantarum) Aelian (De Natura Animalium) Pliny the Elder (Natural History) Dioscorides (De Materia Medica) Renaissance Gaspard Bauhin (Pinax theatri botanici) Otto Brunfels Hieronymus Bock Andrea Cesalpino Valerius Cordus Leonhart Fuchs Conrad Gessner (Historia animalium) Frederik Ruysch William Turner (Avium Praecipuarum, New Herball) John Gerard (Herball, or Generall Historie of Plantes) Enlightenment Robert Hooke (Micrographia) Marcello Malpighi Antonie van Leeuwenhoek William Derham Hans Sloane Jan Swammerdam Carl Linnaeus (Systema Naturae) Georg Steller Joseph Banks Johan Christian Fabricius James Hutton John Ray (Historia Plantarum) Comte de Buffon (Histoire Naturelle) Bernard Germain de Lacépède Gilbert White (The Natural History of Selborne) Thomas Bewick (A History of British Birds) Jean-Baptiste Lamarck (Philosophie zoologique) 19th century George Montagu (Ornithological Dictionary) Georges Cuvier (Le Règne Animal) William Smith Charles Darwin (On the Origin of Species) Alfred Russel Wallace (The Malay Archipelago) Henry Walter Bates (The Naturalist on the River Amazons) Alexander von Humboldt John James Audubon (The Birds of America) William Buckland Charles Lyell Mary Anning Jean-Henri Fabre Louis Agassiz Philip Henry Gosse Asa Gray William Jackson Hooker Joseph Dalton Hooker William Jardine (The Naturalist's Library) Ernst Haeckel (Kunstformen der Natur) Richard Lydekker (The Royal Natural History) 20th century Abbott Thayer (Concealing-Coloration in the Animal Kingdom) Hugh B. Cott (Adaptive Coloration in Animals) Niko Tinbergen (The Study of Instinct) Konrad Lorenz (On Aggression) Karl von Frisch (The Dancing Bees) Ronald Lockley (Shearwaters) Topics Natural history museums (List) Parson-naturalists (List) Natural History Societies List of natural history dealers v t e History of biology Fields, disciplines Agricultural science Anatomy Biochemistry Biotechnology Botany Ecology Evolutionary thought Genetics Geology Immunology Medicine Model organisms Molecular biology Molecular evolution Paleontology Phycology Plant systematics RNA biology Zoology (since 1859) Zoology (through 1859) Institutions Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Laboratory of Molecular Biology Marine Biological Laboratory Max Planck Society Pasteur Institute Rockefeller University Rothamsted Research Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute Theories, concepts Germ theory of disease Central dogma of molecular biology Darwinism Great chain of being Hierarchy of life Lamarckism One gene–one enzyme hypothesis Protocell RNA world Sequence hypothesis Spontaneous generation History Classical antiquity Aristotle Aristotle's biology On Generation and Corruption History of Animals Theophrastus Historia Plantarum Dioscorides De materia medica Galen Renaissance, early modern Conrad Gessner Historia animalium Andreas Vesalius De humani corporis fabrica William Harvey De Motu Cordis Frederik Ruysch Jan Swammerdam Antonie van Leeuwenhoek Regnier de Graaf Marcello Malpighi Robert Hooke Micrographia Francesco Redi Evolution 19th century Linnaeus Systema Naturae Buffon Histoire Naturelle Lamarck Philosophie Zoologique Humboldt Charles Lyell Principles of Geology Charles Darwin On the Origin of Species The Descent of Man Gregor Mendel Alfred Russel Wallace Henry Walter Bates Modern synthesis William Bateson Theodosius Dobzhansky Genetics and the Origin of Species R. A. Fisher E. B. Ford J. B. S. Haldane Ernst Mayr Thomas Hunt Morgan George Gaylord Simpson Hugo de Vries Sewall Wright Recent Stephen Jay Gould W. D. Hamilton Lynn Margulis Aleksandr Oparin George C. Williams Carl Woese Microbiology Ferdinand Cohn Alexander Fleming Felix d'Herelle Robert Koch Louis Pasteur Martinus Beijerinck Lazzaro Spallanzani Sergei Winogradsky Develop. biol., evo-devo Karl Ernst von Baer Gavin de Beer Sean B. Carroll Scott F. Gilbert Walter Gehring Ernst Haeckel François Jacob Edward B. Lewis Jacques Monod Christiane Nüsslein-Volhard Eric Wieschaus E. B. Wilson Genetics, molecular biology Experiments Griffith's (1928) Luria–Delbrück (1943) Avery–MacLeod–McCarty (1944) Miller–Urey (1952) Hershey–Chase (1952) Meselson–Stahl (1958) Crick, Brenner et al. (1961) Nirenberg–Matthaei (1961) Nirenberg–Leder (1964) People Barbara McClintock George Beadle Seymour Benzer Rosalind Franklin Photo 51 James D. Watson and Francis Crick "Molecular structure of Nucleic Acids" Linus Pauling "Sickle Cell Anemia, a Molecular Disease" Fred Sanger Max Perutz John Kendrew Sydney Brenner Joshua Lederberg Walter Gilbert Kary Mullis Emmanuelle Charpentier Jennifer Doudna Ecology Rachel Carson Frederic Clements Charles Elton Henry Gleason Arthur Tansley Eugenius Warming Ethology Niko Tinbergen Karl von Frisch Konrad Lorenz Frans de Waal Jane Goodall Ivan Pavlov Related History of science Philosophy of biology Teleology Ethnobotany Eugenics History of the creation-evolution controversy Human Genome Project Humboldtian science Natural history Natural philosophy Natural theology Relationship between religion and science Timeline of biology and organic chemistry Category Authority control BIBSYS: 95001407 BNC: 000187067 BNE: XX880203 BNF: cb13092799r (data) CANTIC: a1141408x CiNii: DA01525983 GND: 118843400 ICCU: IT\ICCU\CFIV\062527 ISNI: 0000 0000 9480 3939 LCCN: n83204415 NDL: 00437970 NKC: nlk20000083449 NLA: 35801425 NLI: 001900561 NLP: A2606067X NSK: 000662082 NTA: 069916179 RERO: 02-A000051764 SELIBR: 183044 SUDOC: 033801223 Trove: 1093640 VcBA: 495/55884 VIAF: 78822798 WorldCat Identities: viaf-53145856942322920573 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pedanius_Dioscorides&oldid=996682031" Categories: 40 births 90 deaths Ancient Greek writers Ancient Greek pharmacologists Ancient Greek physicians Pre-Linnaean botanists Ancient Greek botanists Herbalists 1st-century Greek people 1st-century writers Pedanii 1st-century physicians Hidden categories: Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata Articles with hCards Articles containing Ancient Greek (to 1453)-language text Commons category link from Wikidata Articles with Project Gutenberg links Articles with Internet Archive links CS1 Italian-language sources (it) CS1 Latin-language sources (la) CS1 French-language sources (fr) Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNC identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CANTIC identifiers Wikipedia articles with CINII identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ICCU identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with NDL identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLI identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLP identifiers Wikipedia articles with NSK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with RERO identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with Trove identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikisource Languages العربية Asturianu Български Bosanski Brezhoneg Català Čeština Deutsch Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français Galego Հայերեն Hrvatski Bahasa Indonesia Italiano עברית Kurdî Latina Magyar Македонски മലയാളം مصرى Mirandés Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Occitan Polski Português Română Русский संस्कृतम् Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska ไทย Тоҷикӣ Türkçe Українська 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 28 December 2020, at 01:53 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2625 ---- Philip Francis (translator) - Wikipedia Philip Francis (translator) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Irish priest and translator Philip Francis (19 July 1708 – 5 March 1773) was an Anglo-Irish clergyman and writer, now remembered as a translator of Horace. Life[edit] He was son of Dr. John Francis, rector of St. Mary's, Dublin (from which living he was for a time ejected for political reasons), and dean of Lismore, and was born in 1708. He was sent to Trinity College, Dublin, taking the degree of B.A. in 1728, and was ordained, according to his father's wish, in the Church of Ireland. He held for some time the curacy of St. Peter's parish, Dublin, and while resident in that city published his translation of Horace, besides writing in the interests of ‘the Castle.’ Soon after the death of his wife, Elizabeth Rowe, whom he married in 1739, he crossed to England, and in 1744 obtained the rectory of Skeyton in Norfolk. He shortly was residing for the sake of literature and society in London. In January 1752, when Edward Gibbon became an inmate of his house, Francis was keeping or supposed to be keeping a school at Esher; but the boys' friends quickly found that the nominal instructor preferred the pleasures of London to the instruction of his pupils and in a month or two Gibbon was removed. To maintain himself in the social life of London, Francis tried many expedients, but most of them were failures. Two plays of his were produced on the stage, each time without success. He tried translation, but, except in his rendering of the works of Horace, he was sidelined by other writers. His fortune was made when he secured, through the kindness of Miss Bellamy, who recommended him, the post of private chaplain to Lady Caroline Fox, and lived in her family, where he taught Lady Sarah Lennox to declaim and Charles James Fox to read. At the end of 1757 Fox was sent to Eton, and Francis accompanied him to assist the boy in his studies. The father, Henry Fox found Francis a useful ally. It has sometimes been said that he was the chief writer in the paper called ‘The Con-test,’ which lived from November 1756 to August 1757, but the accuracy of this statement is doubted. He is also said to have contributed to the ‘Gazette’ daily newspaper on behalf of the court interest. When William Pitt the Elder resigned, in 1761, Francis wrote a libel against him under the title of ‘Mr. Pitt's Letter Versified,’ the notes to which, according to Horace Walpole, were supplied by Henry Fox (now Lord Holland), and he followed this with ‘A Letter from the Anonymous Author of “Mr. Pitt's Letter Versified,”’ in which he reflected on Pitt's indifference to the truculent language of Colonel Isaac Barré. In 1764 he attacked Pitt and John Wilkes with great bitterness in the ‘Political Theatre.’ On 22 June 1761 he was inducted to the vicarage of Chilham in Kent, but resigned in the summer of 1762, and through Lord Holland's influence he held from May 1764 to 1768 the chaplaincy at Chelsea Hospital, and the rectory of Barrow, Suffolk, to which he was instituted on 26 February 1762, and which he retained until his death. He was also recommended in January 1764 by George Grenville for a crown pension. Francis was still unsatisfied. He quarrelled with Lord Holland because he had not been made an Irish bishop, and threatened to expose his patron's villainy. In June 1771 he was seized by a paralytic stroke, and after lingering for some years died at Bath 5 March 1773. He was fond of his son Sir Philip Francis, and numerous letters to and from him are in the son's memoir; he resented his son's marriage, but they were later reconciled. Works[edit] Of his rendering of Horace, Samuel Johnson said: ‘The lyrical part of Horace never can be perfectly translated. Francis has done it the best. I'll take his five out of six against them all.’ The first part, consisting of the ‘Odes, Epodes, and Carmen Seculare of Horace in Latin and English,’ in which he was assisted by William Dunkin, was issued at Dublin in two volumes in 1742. It was republished in London in the next year, and in 1746 two more volumes, containing the ‘Satires, Epistles, and Art of Poetry,’ appeared with a dedication in prose to Robert Jocelyn, lord chancellor of Ireland. The whole version was reissued in 1747, and it ran into many subsequent editions, that edited by Edward Dubois being the best. It was also included in the set of poets edited by Alexander Chalmers, the ‘British Poets,’ vols. xcvii–viii., and in Charles Whittingham's ‘Greek and Roman Poets,’ vol. xii. Francis worked in 1751 on his play of ‘Eugenia,’ an adaptation of the French tragedy of ‘Cenie,’ and it was acted at Drury Lane Theatre on 17 February 1752, but was unsuccessful; Lord Chesterfield attributed its failure to the fact that pit and gallery did not like a tragedy without bloodshed. A similar failure attended his play of ‘Constantine,’ which was produced at Covent Garden on 23 February 1754, and expired on the fourth night. Genest styles it ‘a cold and uninteresting play, the plot avowedly taken in part from a French piece.’ Both pieces were printed, the former being dedicated to the Countess of Lincoln, and the latter to Lord Chesterfield. For eight years he was employed in studying the ‘Orations’ of Demosthenes, and his translation appeared in two volumes in 1757–8, but it was thought inferior to that by Thomas Leland. An anonymous volume by John Taylor was printed in 1813 with the title of A Discovery of the Author of the “Letters of Junius,” founded on Evidence and Illustrations. It attributed the authorship of the Letters of Junius to Francis and his son, Sir Philip Francis, and claimed that all the peculiarities of language in the writings of the elder Francis are discernible in some parts of Junius. Contemporary scholarly consensus is that the son was the author. References[edit]  This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: "Francis, Philip (1708?-1773)". Dictionary of National Biography. London: Smith, Elder & Co. 1885–1900. Authority control BNE: XX4940010 BNF: cb14303901s (data) GND: 137885709 ISNI: 0000 0001 1584 460X LCCN: n78086030 NLI: 000416431 NTA: 075050102 SELIBR: 282312 SNAC: w6vt47dn SUDOC: 118003887 Trove: 1075440 VIAF: 223591 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n78086030 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Philip_Francis_(translator)&oldid=982150865" Categories: 1708 births 1773 deaths 18th-century Irish Anglican priests Irish translators Latin–English translators Hidden categories: Articles with short description Short description matches Wikidata Use dmy dates from October 2019 Articles incorporating Cite DNB template Articles incorporating DNB text with Wikisource reference Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLI identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SNAC-ID identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with Trove identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikisource Languages Català Español Français Svenska Edit links This page was last edited on 6 October 2020, at 13:02 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2626 ---- Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam - Wikipedia Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Persian-English quatrains translations by Edward Fitzgerald This article is about the work by Edward FitzGerald. For poetry attributed to Omar Khayyam, see Omar Khayyam § Poetry. Rubáiyát of Omar Khayyám, the Astronomer-Poet of Persia. Rendered into English Verse Front cover of the first American edition (1878) Author Omar Khayyam Translator Edward FitzGerald Genre Poetry Publisher Bernard Quaritch Publication date 1859 Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam by M. V. Dhurandhar Rubáiyát of Omar Khayyám is the title that Edward FitzGerald gave to his 1859 translation from Persian to English of a selection of quatrains (rubāʿiyāt) attributed to Omar Khayyam (1048–1131), dubbed "the Astronomer-Poet of Persia". Although commercially unsuccessful at first, FitzGerald's work was popularised from 1861 onward by Whitley Stokes, and the work came to be greatly admired by the Pre-Raphaelites in England. FitzGerald had a third edition printed in 1872, which increased interest in the work in the United States. By the 1880s, the book was extremely popular throughout the English-speaking world, to the extent that numerous "Omar Khayyam clubs" were formed and there was a "fin de siècle cult of the Rubaiyat".[1] FitzGerald's work has been published in several hundred editions and has inspired similar translation efforts in English and in many other languages. Contents 1 Sources 2 Skepticism vs. Sufism debate 3 Editions 4 Character of translation 5 Other translations 5.1 English 5.2 German 5.3 French 5.4 Russian 5.5 Other languages 6 Influence 6.1 Literature 6.2 Cinema 6.3 Music 6.4 Television 6.5 Other media 6.6 Other 6.7 Anniversary events 7 See also 8 References 9 Further reading 10 External links Sources[edit] Further information: Omar Khayyam § Poetry Calligraphic manuscript page with three of FitzGerald's Rubaiyat written by William Morris, illustration by Edward Burne-Jones (1870s). Illustration by Adelaide Hanscom (c. 1910). The authenticity of the poetry attributed to Omar Khayyam is highly uncertain. Khayyam was famous during his lifetime not as a poet but as an astronomer and mathematician. The earliest reference to his having written poetry is found in his biography by al-Isfahani, written 43 years after his death. This view is reinforced by other medieval historians such as Shahrazuri (1201) and Al-Qifti (1255). Parts of the Rubaiyat appear as incidental quotations from Omar in early works of biography and in anthologies. These include works of Razi (ca. 1160–1210), Daya (1230), Juvayni (ca. 1226–1283), and Jajarmi (1340).[2]:92[3]:434 Also, five quatrains assigned to Khayyam in somewhat later sources appear in Zahiri Samarqandi's Sindbad-Nameh (before 1160) without attribution.[4]:34 The number of quatrains attributed to him in more recent collections varies from about 1,200 (according to Saeed Nafisi) to more than 2,000. Skeptical scholars point out that the entire tradition may be pseudepigraphic.[4]:11 The extant manuscripts containing collections attributed to Omar are dated much too late to enable a reconstruction of a body of authentic verses. In the 1930s, Iranian scholars, notably Mohammad-Ali Foroughi, attempted to reconstruct a core of authentic verses from scattered quotes by authors of the 13th and 14th centuries, ignoring the younger manuscript tradition. After World War II, reconstruction efforts were significantly delayed by two clever forgeries. De Blois (2004) is pessimistic, suggesting that contemporary scholarship has not advanced beyond the situation of the 1930s, when Hans Heinrich Schaeder commented that the name of Omar Khayyam "is to be struck out from the history of Persian literature".[5] A feature of the more recent collections is the lack of linguistic homogeneity and continuity of ideas. Sadegh Hedayat commented that "if a man had lived for a hundred years and had changed his religion, philosophy, and beliefs twice a day, he could scarcely have given expression to such a range of ideas".[4]:34 Hedayat's final verdict was that 14 quatrains could be attributed to Khayyam with certainty.[6] Various tests have been employed to reduce the quatrains attributable to Omar to about 100.[3]:434 Arthur Christensen states that "of more than 1,200 ruba'is known to be ascribed to Omar, only 121 could be regarded as reasonably authentic".[7]:663 Foroughi accepts 178 quatrains as authentic, while Ali Dashti accepts 36 of them.[3]:96 FitzGerald's source was transcripts sent to him in 1856–57, by his friend and teacher Edward B. Cowell, of two manuscripts, a Bodleian manuscript with 158 quatrains[8] and a "Calcutta manuscript". FitzGerald completed his first draft in 1857 and sent it to Fraser's Magazine in January 1858. He made a revised draft in January 1859, of which he privately printed 250 copies. This first edition became extremely sought after by the 1890s, when "more than two million copies ha[d] been sold in two hundred editions".[9] Skepticism vs. Sufism debate[edit] The extreme popularity of FitzGerald's work led to a prolonged debate on the correct interpretation of the philosophy behind the poems. FitzGerald emphasized the religious skepticism he found in Omar Khayyam.[10] In his preface to the Rubáiyát, he describes Omar's philosophy as Epicurean and claims that Omar was "hated and dreaded by the Sufis, whose practice he ridiculed and whose faith amounts to little more than his own, when stripped of the Mysticism and formal recognition of Islamism under which Omar would not hide".[11] Richard Nelson Frye also emphasizes that Khayyam was despised by a number of prominent contemporary Sufis. These include figures such as Shams Tabrizi, Najm al-Din Daya, Al-Ghazali, and Attar, who "viewed Khayyam not as a fellow-mystic, but a free-thinking scientist".[7]:663–664 The skeptic interpretation is supported by the medieval historian Al-Qifti (ca. 1172–1248), who in his The History of Learned Men reports that Omar's poems were only outwardly in the Sufi style but were written with an anti-religious agenda. He also mentions that Khayyam was indicted for impiety and went on a pilgrimage to avoid punishment.[12] Critics of FitzGerald, on the other hand, have accused the translator of misrepresenting the mysticism of Sufi poetry by an overly literal interpretation. Thus, the view of Omar Khayyam as a Sufi was defended by Bjerregaard (1915).[13] Dougan (1991) likewise says that attributing hedonism to Omar is due to the failings of FitzGerald's translation, arguing that the poetry is to be understood as "deeply esoteric".[14] Idries Shah (1999) similarly says that FitzGerald misunderstood Omar's poetry.[15] The Sufi interpretation is the view of a minority of scholars.[16] Henry Beveridge states that "the Sufis have unaccountably pressed this writer [Khayyam] into their service; they explain away some of his blasphemies by forced interpretations, and others they represent as innocent freedoms and reproaches".[17] Aminrazavi (2007) states that "Sufi interpretation of Khayyam is possible only by reading into his Rubaiyat extensively and by stretching the content to fit the classical Sufi doctrine".[2]:128 FitzGerald's "skepticist" reading of the poetry is still defended by modern scholars. Sadegh Hedayat (The Blind Owl 1936) was the most notable modern proponent of Khayyam's philosophy as agnostic skepticism. In his introductory essay to his second edition of the Quatrains of the Philosopher Omar Khayyam (1922), Hedayat states that "while Khayyam believes in the transmutation and transformation of the human body, he does not believe in a separate soul; if we are lucky, our bodily particles would be used in the making of a jug of wine".[18] He concludes that "religion has proved incapable of surmounting his inherent fears; thus Khayyam finds himself alone and insecure in a universe about which his knowledge is nil". In his later work (Khayyam's Quatrains, 1935), Hedayat further maintains that Khayyam's usage of Sufic terminology such as "wine" is literal, and that "Khayyam took refuge in wine to ward off bitterness and to blunt the cutting edge of his thoughts."[6] Editions[edit] Illustration by Edmund Joseph Sullivan for Quatrain 11 of Fitzgerald's First Version. Illustration by Edmund Joseph Sullivan for Quatrain 12 of Fitzgerald's First Version. Illustration by Edmund Joseph Sullivan for Quatrain 51 of Fitzgerald's First Version. FitzGerald's text was published in five editions, with substantial revisions: 1st edition – 1859 [75 quatrains] 2nd edition – 1868 [110 quatrains] 3rd edition – 1872 [101 quatrains] 1878, "first American edition", reprint of the 3rd ed. 4th edition – 1879 [101 quatrains] 5th edition – 1889 [101 quatrains] Of the five editions published, four were published under the authorial control of FitzGerald. The fifth edition, which contained only minor changes from the fourth, was edited posthumously on the basis of manuscript revisions FitzGerald had left. Numerous later editions were published after 1889, notably an edition with illustrations by Willy Pogany first published in 1909 (George G. Harrap, London). It was issued in numerous revised editions. This edition combined FitzGerald's texts of the 1st and 4th editions and was subtitled "The First and Fourth Renderings in English Verse". A bibliography of editions compiled in 1929 listed more than 300 separate editions.[19] Many more have been published since.[20] Notable editions of the late 19th and early 20th centuries include: Houghton, Mifflin & Co. (1887, 1888, 1894); Doxey, At the Sign of the Lark (1898, 1900), illustrations by Florence Lundborg; The Macmillan Company (1899); Methuen (1900) with a commentary by H.M. Batson, and a biographical introduction by E.D. Ross; Little, Brown, and Company (1900), with the versions of E.H. Whinfield and Justin Huntly McCart; Bell (1901); Routledge (1904); Foulis (1905, 1909); Essex House Press (1905); Dodge Publishing Company (1905); Duckworth & Co. (1908); Hodder and Stoughton (1909), illustrations by Edmund Dulac; Tauchnitz (1910); East Anglian Daily Times (1909), Centenary celebrations souvenir; Warner (1913); The Roycrofters (1913); Hodder & Stoughton (1913), illustrations by René Bull; Dodge Publishing Company (1914), illustrations by Adelaide Hanscom. Sully and Kleinteich (1920). Critical editions have been published by Decker (1997)[21] and by Arberry (2016).[22] Character of translation[edit] FitzGerald's translation is rhyming and metrical, and rather free. Many of the verses are paraphrased, and some of them cannot be confidently traced to his source material at all.[23] Michael Kearney claimed that FitzGerald described his work as "transmogrification".[24] To a large extent, the Rubaiyat can be considered original poetry by FitzGerald loosely based on Omar's quatrains rather than a "translation" in the narrow sense. FitzGerald was open about the liberties he had taken with his source material: My translation will interest you from its form, and also in many respects in its detail: very un-literal as it is. Many quatrains are mashed together: and something lost, I doubt, of Omar's simplicity, which is so much a virtue in him. (letter to E. B. Cowell, 9/3/58) I suppose very few People have ever taken such Pains in Translation as I have: though certainly not to be literal. But at all Cost, a Thing must live: with a transfusion of one's own worse Life if one can’t retain the Original's better. Better a live Sparrow than a stuffed Eagle. (letter to E. B. Cowell, 4/27/59) For comparison, here are two versions of the same quatrain by FitzGerald, from the 1859 and 1889 editions: Quatrain XI (1859) Here with a Loaf of Bread beneath the Bough, A Flask of Wine, a Book of Verse—and Thou Beside me singing in the Wilderness— And Wilderness is Paradise enow. Quatrain XII (1889)[25] A Book of Verses underneath the Bough, A Jug of Wine, a Loaf of Bread—and Thou Beside me singing in the Wilderness— Oh, Wilderness were Paradise enow! This quatrain has a close correspondence in two of the quatrains in the Bodleian Library ms., numbers 149 and 155. In the literal prose translation of Edward Heron-Allen (1898):[26] No. 149 I desire a little ruby wine and a book of verses, Just enough to keep me alive, and half a loaf is needful; And then, that I and thou should sit in a desolate place Is better than the kingdom of a sultan. No. 155 If a loaf of wheaten-bread be forthcoming, a gourd of wine, and a thigh-bone of mutton, and then, if thou and I be sitting in the wilderness, — that would be a joy to which no sultan can set bounds. Other translations[edit] This section may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. The specific problem is: should become more systematic, perhaps in table form, with fewer random quotations Please help improve this section if you can. (September 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) English[edit] Multilingual edition, published in 1955 by Tahrir Iran Co./Kashani Bros. Two English editions by Edward Henry Whinfield (1836–1922) consisted of 253 quatrains in 1882 and 500 in 1883. This translation was fully revised and some cases fully translated anew by Ali Salami and published by Mehrandish Books. Whinfield's translation is, if possible, even more free than FitzGerald's[dubious – discuss]; Quatrain 84 (equivalent of FitzGerald's quatrain XI in his 1st edition, as above) reads: In the sweet spring a grassy bank I sought And thither wine and a fair Houri brought; And, though the people called me graceless dog, Gave not to Paradise another thought! John Leslie Garner published an English translation of 152 quatrains in 1888. His was also a free, rhyming translation. Quatrain I. 20 (equivalent of FitzGerald's quatrain XI in his 1st edition, as above): Yes, Loved One, when the Laughing Spring is blowing, With Thee beside me and the Cup o’erflowing, I pass the day upon this Waving Meadow, And dream the while, no thought on Heaven bestowing. Justin Huntly McCarthy (1859–1936) (Member of Parliament for Newry) published prose translations of 466 quatrains in 1889.[27] Quatrain 177 (equivalent of FitzGerald's quatrain XI in his 1st edition, as above): In Spring time I love to sit in the meadow with a paramour perfect as a Houri and goodly jar of wine, and though I may be blamed for this, yet hold me lower than a dog if ever I dream of Paradise. Richard Le Gallienne (1866–1947) produced a verse translation, subtitled "a paraphrase from several literal translations", in 1897. In his introductory note to the reader, Le Gallienne cites McCarthy's "charming prose" as the chief influence on his version. Some example quatrains follow: Look not above, there is no answer there; Pray not, for no one listens to your prayer; Near is as near to God as any Far, And Here is just the same deceit as There. (#78, on p. 44) And do you think that unto such as you; A maggot-minded, starved, fanatic crew: God gave the secret, and denied it me?— Well, well, what matters it! Believe that, too. (#85, p. 47) "Did God set grapes a-growing, do you think, And at the same time make it sin to drink? Give thanks to Him who foreordained it thus— Surely He loves to hear the glasses clink!" (#91, p. 48) Edward Heron-Allen (1861–1943) published a prose translation in 1898. He also wrote an introduction to an edition of the translation by Frederick Rolfe (Baron Corvo) into English from Nicolas's French translation. Below is Quatrain 17 translated by E. H. into English:[28] This worn caravanserai which is called the world Is the resting-place of the piebald horse of night and day; It is a pavilion which has been abandoned by a hundred Jamshyds; It is a palace that is the resting-place of a hundred Bahrams. The English novelist and orientalist Jessie Cadell (1844–1884) consulted various manuscripts of the Rubaiyat with the intention of producing an authoritative edition. Her translation of 150 quatrains was published posthumously in 1899.[29] A. J. Arberry in 1959 attempted a scholarly edition of Khayyam, based on thirteenth-century manuscripts. However, his manuscripts were subsequently exposed as twentieth-century forgeries.[30] While Arberry's work had been misguided, it was published in good faith. The 1967 translation of the Rubáiyat by Robert Graves and Omar Ali-Shah, however, created a scandal. The authors claimed it was based on a twelfth-century manuscript located in Afghanistan, where it was allegedly utilized as a Sufi teaching document. But the manuscript was never produced, and British experts in Persian literature were easily able to prove that the translation was in fact based on Edward Heron Allen's analysis of possible sources for FitzGerald's work.[30][2]:155 Quatrains 11 and 12 (equivalent of FitzGerald's quatrain XI in his 1st edition, as above): Should our day's portion be one mancel loaf, A haunch of mutton and a gourd of wine Set for us two alone on the wide plain, No Sultan's bounty could evoke such joy. A gourd of red wine and a sheaf of poems — A bare subsistence, half a loaf, not more — Supplied us two alone in the free desert: What Sultan could we envy on his throne? John Charles Edward Bowen (1909–1989) was a British poet and translator of Persian poetry. He is best known for his translation of the Rubaiyat, titled A New Selection from the Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam. Bowen is also credited as being one of the first scholars to question Robert Graves' and Omar Ali-Shah's translation of the Rubaiyat.[31] A modern version of 235 quatrains, claiming to be "as literal an English version of the Persian originals as readability and intelligibility permit", was published in 1979 by Peter Avery and John Heath-Stubbs. Their edition provides two versions of the thematic quatrain, the first (98) considered by the Persian writer Sadeq Hedayat to be a spurious attribution.[citation needed] 98. I need a jug of wine and a book of poetry, Half a loaf for a bite to eat, Then you and I, seated in a deserted spot, Will have more wealth than a Sultan's realm. 234. If chance supplied a loaf of white bread, Two casks of wine and a leg of mutton, In the corner of a garden with a tulip-cheeked girl, There'd be enjoyment no Sultan could outdo. In 1988, the Rubaiyat was translated by an Iranian for the first time.[32] Karim Emami's translation of the Rubaiyat was published under the title The Wine of Nishapour in Paris. The Wine of Nishapour is the collection of Khayyam's poetry by Shahrokh Golestan, including Golestan's pictures in front of each poem.[33] Example quatrain 160 (equivalent[dubious – discuss] to FitzGerald's quatrain XI in his first edition, as above): In spring if a houri-like sweetheart Gives me a cup of wine on the edge of a green cornfield, Though to the vulgar this would be blasphemy, If I mentioned any other Paradise, I'd be worse than a dog. In 1991, Ahmad Saidi (1904–1994) produced an English translation of 165 quatrains grouped into 10 themes. Born and raised in Iran, Saidi went to the United States in 1931 and attended college there. He served as the head of the Persian Publication Desk at the U.S. Office of War Information during World War II, inaugurated the Voice of America in Iran, and prepared an English-Persian military dictionary for the Department of Defense. His quatrains include the original Persian verses for reference alongside his English translations. His focus was to faithfully convey, with less poetic license, Khayyam's original religious, mystical, and historic Persian themes, through the verses as well as his extensive annotations. Two example quatrains follow: Quatrain 16 (equivalent to FitzGerald's quatrain XII in his 5th edition, as above): Ah, would there were a loaf of bread as fare, A joint of lamb, a jug of vintage rare, And you and I in wilderness encamped— No Sultan's pleasure could with ours compare. Quatrain 75: The sphere upon which mortals come and go, Has no end nor beginning that we know; And none there is to tell us in plain truth: Whence do we come and whither do we go. German[edit] Adolf Friedrich von Schack (1815–1894) published a German translation in 1878. Quatrain 151 (equivalent of FitzGerald's quatrain XI in his 1st edition, as above): Gönnt mir, mit dem Liebchen im Gartenrund Zu weilen bei süßem Rebengetränke, Und nennt mich schlimmer als einen Hund, Wenn ferner an's Paradies ich denke! Friedrich Martinus von Bodenstedt (1819–1892) published a German translation in 1881. The translation eventually consisted of 395 quatrains. Quatrain IX, 59 (equivalent of FitzGerald's quatrain XI in his 1st edition, as above): Im Frühling mag ich gern im Grüne weilen Und Einsamkeit mit einer Freundin teilen Und einem Kruge Wein. Mag man mich schelten: Ich lasse keinen andern Himmel gelten. French[edit] The first French translation, of 464 quatrains in prose, was made by J. B. Nicolas, chief interpreter at the French embassy in Persia in 1867. Prose stanza (equivalent of Fitzgerald's quatrain XI in his 1st edition, as above): Au printemps j’aime à m’asseoir au bord d’une prairie, avec une idole semblable à une houri et une cruche de vin, s’il y en a, et bien que tout cela soit généralement blâmé, je veux être pire qu’un chien si jamais je songe au paradis. The best-known version in French is the free verse edition by Franz Toussaint (1879–1955) published in 1924. This translation consisting of 170 quatrains was done from the original Persian text, while most of the other French translations were themselves translations of FitzGerald's work. The Éditions d'art Henri Piazza published the book almost unchanged between 1924 and 1979. Toussaint's translation has served as the basis of subsequent translations into other languages, but Toussaint did not live to witness the influence his translation has had. Quatrain XXV (equivalent of FitzGerald's quatrain XI in his 1st edition, as above): Au printemps, je vais quelquefois m’asseoir à la lisière d’un champ fleuri. Lorsqu’une belle jeune fille m’apporte une coupe de vin, je ne pense guère à mon salut. Si j’avais cette préoccupation, je vaudrais moins qu’un chien. Russian[edit] Many Russian-language translations have been undertaken, reflecting the popularity of the Rubaiyat in Russia since the late 19th century and the increasingly popular tradition of using it for the purposes of bibliomancy. The earliest verse translation (by Vasily Velichko) was published in 1891. The version by Osip Rumer published in 1914 is a translation of FitzGerald's version. Rumer later published a version of 304 rubaiyat translated directly from Persian. A lot of poetic translations (some based on verbatim translations into prose by others) were also written by German Plisetsky, Konstantin Bal'mont, Cecilia Banu, I. I. Tkhorzhevsky (ru), L. Pen'kovsky, and others. Other languages[edit] In Polish, several collections of Rubaiyat have appeared, including ones by Professor Andrzej Gawroński (1933, 1969), regarded as the best. The first translation of nine short poems into Serbo-Croatian was published in 1920, and was the work of Safvet beg Bašagić. In 1932, Jelena Skerlić-Ćorović re-published these nine, alongside 75 more poems. In 1964, noted orientalist Fehim Bajraktarević published his translation of the Rubaiyat.[34] In Icelandic Magnús Ásgeirsson translated the Rubaiyat in 1935. There was an earlier translation by Einar Benediktsson in 1921. Jochum M. Eggertsson (Skuggi) published a translation in 1946. All translations are of FitzGerald's version. First Czech translator is Josef Štýbr. At first he translated from English (from FitzGerald's "translations") (1922), after that from original language (1931). Translation from the original can be found on Czech wikisource (770 poems). Subsequent translators are mentioned here. The poet J. H. Leopold (1865–1925) rendered a number of rubaiyat into Dutch. Eric Hermelin translated the Rubaiyat into Swedish in 1928. Sir John Morris-Jones translated direct from Persian into Welsh in 1928. In Finnish, the first translations were made by Toivo Lyy in 1929. More recently Jaakko Hämeen-Anttila (1999 and 2008) and Kiamars Baghban with Leevi Lehto (2009) have translated Khayyam into Finnish. G. Sankara Kurup produced a translation into Malayalam (1932). Duvvoori Ramireddy translated the Rubaiyat into Telugu in 1935. Thomas Ifor Rees produced a Welsh translation, published in Mexico City in 1939. Kantichandra Ghosh, Muhammad Shahidullah (in 1942), Kazi Nazrul Islam (in 1958) and Shakti Chattopadhyay (in 1978) produced translations into Bengali. The earliest translation in Hungarian consisted of a few stanzas taken from the French version of Nicolas, by Béla Erődi in 1919–20. Lőrinc Szabó finalized his translation of the FitzGerald version in 1943. Fraînque Le Maistre produced a Jèrriais version (based on FitzGerald's 1st edition) during the German occupation of the Channel Islands (1940–1945). Srimadajjada Adibhatla Narayana Das (1864–1945) translated the original Persian quatrains and Edward FitzGerald's English translations into Sanskrit and pure-Telugu. Pandit Narayana Das claimed his translation was more literal than that of FitzGerald. (See Ajjada Adibhatla Narayana Dasu.) Poet Cornelis Jacobus Langenhoven (1873–1932, author of "Die Stem van Suid-Afrika") produced the first translation in Afrikaans. Herman Charles Bosman wrote a translation into Afrikaans published in 1948. In Japan, until 1949, more than 10 poets and/or scholars made translations into Japanese.[35] The first complete translation from Persian into the modern Japanese language was made by Ryosaku Ogawa in 1949, which is still popular and has been published from Iwanami Shoten (it is now in the public domain and also freely available from Aozora Bunko).[36] Historically, the first attempt was six poems translated by Kambara Ariake in 1908.[35] In 1910, Kakise Hikozo translated 110 poems from the 5th edition of FitzGerald's translation.[35] The first translation from Persian into the classical Japanese language was made by a linguist, Shigeru Araki, in 1920.[35] Among various other translations, Ogawa highly evaluates Ryo Mori's (ja:森亮), produced in 1931.[35] D. V. Gundappa translated the work into Kannada as a collection of poems titled "Umarana Osage" in 1952. Robert Bin Shaaban produced a version in Swahili (dated 1948, published 1952). Gopal Chandra Kanungo illustrated and translated the book into Odia in 1954. Devdas Chhotray adapted Edward FitzGerald's work into Oriya and recorded it in musical form in 2011. The first translator into Slovene was Alojz Gradnik, his translation being published in 1955. It was translated again by Slovene translator and poet Bert Pribac in 2007 from the French Toussaint edition.[34] Maithili Sharan Gupt and Harivanshrai Bachchan translated the book into Hindi in 1959. Francesco Gabrieli produced an Italian translation (Le Rubaiyyàt di Omar Khayyàm) in 1944. Alessandro Bausani produced another translation in 1965. It was translated into Latvian by Andrejs Kurcijs in 1970. Christos Marketis translated 120 rubaiyat into Greek in 1975. 172 rubaiyat were translated into Belarusian by Ryhor Baradulin in 1989. Thirunalloor Karunakaran translated the Rubaiyat into Malayalam in 1989. In 1990, Jowann Richards produced a Cornish translation. Scottish poet Rab Wilson published a version in Scots in 2004. In 2015 it was translated into Romanian for the first time by orientalist philologist Gheorghe Iorga. Kerson Huang based a Chinese version on FitzGerald's version.[year needed] Fan Noli produced an Albanian translation in 1927, the melody and poetics of which are highly regarded. At least four versions exist in the Thai language. These translations were made from the text of FitzGerald. Their respective authors are HRH Prince Narathip Prapanpong, Rainan Aroonrungsee (pen name: Naan Gitirungsi), Pimarn Jamjarus (pen name: Kaen Sungkeet), and Suriyachat Chaimongkol.[citation needed] Haljand Udam produced an Estonian translation.[year needed] Ahmed Rami, a famous late Egyptian poet, translated the work into Arabic.[year needed] His translation was sung by Umm Kulthum. The Kurdish poet Hajar translated the Rubaiyat in his Chwar Parchakani Xayam.[year needed] Armenian poet Kevork Emin has translated several verses of the Rubaiyat.[year needed] The Assyrian journalist and poet Naum Faiq translated the Rubaiyat into the Syriac language.[year needed] The Assyrian author Eshaya Elisha Khinno translated the Rubaiyat into Sureth (Assyrian Neo-Aramaic) in 2012[37][38] Hồ Thượng Tuy translated from English into Vietnamese (from FitzGerald's 1st edition) in 1990. Nguyễn Viết Thắng produced a Vietnamese translation of 487 rubaiyat, translated from English and Russian in 1995, published in Hanoi in 2003. Xabier Correa Corredoira published a Galician translation in 2010.[39] Hemendra Kumar Roy translated the Rubaiyat into Bengali.[year needed] Radha Mohan Gadanayak translated the Rubaiyat into Odia[year needed][40] Tadhg Ó Donnchadha (Torna) translated the Rubaiyat from English into Irish in 1920. The Filipino poet and linguist Ildefonso Santos published his Tagalog translation in 1953. Influence[edit] FitzGerald rendered Omar's name as "Omar the Tentmaker",[dubious – discuss] and this name resonated in English-speaking popular culture for a while. Thus, Nathan Haskell Dole published a novel called Omar, the Tentmaker: A Romance of Old Persia in 1898. Omar the Tentmaker of Naishapur is a historical novel by John Smith Clarke, published in 1910. "Omar the Tentmaker" is a 1914 play in an oriental setting by Richard Walton Tully, adapted as a silent film in 1922. US General Omar Bradley was given the nickname "Omar the Tent-Maker" in World War II,[41] and the name has been recorded as a slang expression for "penis".[42] FitzGerald's translations also reintroduced Khayyam to Iranians, "who had long ignored the Neishapouri poet".[43] Literature[edit] This article contains a list of miscellaneous information. Please relocate any relevant information into other sections or articles. (September 2017) The title of Rex Stout's Nero Wolfe novel Some Buried Caesar comes from one of the Tentmaker's quatrains (FitzGerald's XVIII), for example. Eugene O'Neill's drama Ah, Wilderness! derives its title from the first quoted quatrain above. Agatha Christie used The Moving Finger as a story title, as did Stephen King. See also And Having Writ…. Lan Wright used Dawn's Left Hand as the title of a science fiction story serialized in New Worlds Science Fiction (January–March 1963). The title of Allen Drury's science fiction novel The Throne of Saturn comes from a quatrain which appears as the book's epigraph. The title of Nevil Shute Norway's novel The Chequer Board is taken from Stanza LXIX, and that stanza appears as the book's epigraph. Equally noteworthy are these works likewise influenced: The satirist and short story writer Hector Hugh Munro took his pen name of 'Saki' from Edward FitzGerald's translation of the Rubaiyat. The American author O. Henry humorously referred to a book by "Homer KM" with the character "Ruby Ott" in his short story "The Handbook of Hymen.[44] " O. Henry also quoted a quatrain from the Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam in "The Rubaiyat of a Scotch Highball". Oliver Herford released a parody of the Rubaiyat called "The Rubaiyat of a Persian Kitten" in 1904, which is notable for its charming illustrations of the kitten in question on his philosophical adventures.[45] The artist/illustrator Edmund Dulac produced some much-beloved illustrations[46] for the Rubaiyat, 1909. The play The Shadow of a Gunman (1923) by Seán O'Casey contains a reference to the Rubaiyat as the character Donal Davoren quotes "grasp this sorry scheme of things entire, and mould life nearer to the heart's desire". The Argentinian writer Jorge Luis Borges discusses The Rubaiyat and its history in an essay, "The Enigma of Edward FitzGerald" ("El enigma de Edward FitzGerald") in his book "Other Inquisitions" ("Otras Inquisiciones", 1952). He also references it in some of his poems, including "Rubaiyat" in "The Praise of the Shadow" ("Elogio de la Sombra", 1969), and "Chess" ("Ajedrez") in "The Maker" ("El Hacedor", 1960). Borges' father Jorge Guillermo Borges was the author of a Spanish translation of the FitzGerald version of The Rubaiyat. Science fiction author Paul Marlowe's story "Resurrection and Life" featured a character who could only communicate using lines from the Rubaiyat. Science fiction author Isaac Asimov quotes The Moving Finger in his time-travel novel The End of Eternity when a character discusses whether history could be changed. Charles Schultz wrote a strip in which Lucy reads the Jug of Wine passage, and Linus asks "No blanket?". Wendy Cope's poem "Strugnell's Rubiyat" is a close parody of the FitzGerald translation, relocated to modern day Tulse Hill. One of the title pages of Principia Discordia (1965), a co-author of which went by the pen-name Omar Khayyam Ravenhurst, features its own spin on the quatrain most quoted above: A jug of wine, A leg of lamb And thou! Beside me, Whistling in the darkness.[47] The Lebanese writer Amin Maalouf based his novel Samarkand (1988) on the life of Omar Khayyam, and the creation of the Rubaiyat. It details the Assassin sect as well, and includes a fictional telling of how the (non-existent) original manuscript came to be on the RMS Titanic. In the opening chapter of his book God is Not Great (2007), Christopher Hitchens quotes from Richard Le Gallienne's translation of Khayyam's famous quatrain: And do you think that unto such as you A maggot-minded, starved, fanatic crew God gave the secret, and denied it me? Well, well—what matters it? Believe that, too! The title of Daphne du Maurier's memoir Myself when Young is a quote from quatrain 27 of Fitzgerald's translation: Myself when young did eagerly frequent Doctor and Saint, and heard great Argument About it and about: but evermore Came out by the same Door as in I went. Cinema[edit] Filmmaker D.W. Griffith planned a film based on the poems as a follow-up to Intolerance in 1916. It was to star Miriam Cooper, but when she left the Griffith company the plans were dropped;[48] he would ultimately film Broken Blossoms instead. Text from the Rubaiyat appeared in intertitles of the lost film A Lover's Oath (1925) The lines "When Time lets slip a little perfect hour, O take it—for it will not come again." appear in the intertitles of Torrent, the 1926 film starring Greta Garbo and Ricardo Cortez. Part of the quatrain beginning "The Moving Finger writes ... " was quoted in Algiers, the 1938 movie starring Charles Boyer and Hedy Lamarr. A canto was quoted and used as an underlying theme of the 1945 screen adaptation of The Picture of Dorian Gray: "I sent my soul through the invisible, some letters of that after-life to spell, and by and by my soul did return, and answered, 'I myself am Heaven and Hell.'" The Rubaiyat was quoted in the 1946 King Vidor Western film Duel in the Sun, which starred Gregory Peck and Jennifer Jones: "Oh threats of hell and hopes of paradise! One thing at least is certain: This life flies. One thing is certain and the rest is Lies; The Flower that once is blown for ever dies." The 1951 film Pandora and the Flying Dutchman, starring James Mason and Ava Gardner, opens with an illuminated manuscript of the quatrain beginning "The moving finger writes...". In the film The Music Man (based on the 1957 musical), town librarian Marian Paroo draws down the wrath of the mayor's wife for encouraging the woman's daughter to read a book of "dirty Persian poetry". Summarizing what she calls the "Ruby Hat of Omar Kayayayayay...I am appalled!!", the mayor's wife paraphrases FitzGerald's Quatrain XII from his 5th edition: "People lying out in the woods eating sandwiches, and drinking directly out of jugs with innocent young girls." The film Omar Khayyam, also known as The Loves Of Omar Khayyam, was released in 1957 by Paramount Pictures and includes excerpts from the Rubaiyat. In Back to the Future the character Lorraine Baines, played by Lea Thompson, is holding a copy of the book in 1955 at the high school when her son Marty McFly is trying to introduce her to his father. The Rubaiyat was quoted in the film 12 Monkeys (1995) around 11 minutes in. In Adrian Lyne's Unfaithful a copy of the text in French is quoted in English: "Drink wine, this is life eternal //This, all that youth will give to you//It is the season for wine, roses//And drunken friends//Be happy for this moment//This moment is your life." The book is a gift given flirtatiously to Diane Lane's character by Olivier Martinez who plays rare book dealer Paul Martel in the film. Music[edit] The British composer Granville Bantock produced a choral setting of FitzGerald's translation 1906–1909. Using FitzGerald's translation, the Armenian-American composer Alan Hovhaness set a dozen of the quatrains to music. This work, The Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam, Op. 308, calls for narrator, orchestra, and solo accordion. The Rubaiyat have also influenced Arabic music. In 1950 the Egyptian singer Umm Kulthum recorded a song entitled "Rubaiyat Al-Khayyam". The Comedian Harmonists in "Wochenend und Sonnenschein". Woody Guthrie recorded an excerpt of the Rubaiyat set to music that was released on Hard Travelin' (The Asch Recordings Vol. 3). The Human Instinct's album Pins In It (1971) opens with a track called "Pinzinet", the lyrics of which are based on the Rubaiyat. Elektra Records released a compilation album named Rubáiyát in 1990 to commemorate the 40th anniversary of the Elektra Records record label. Coldcut produced an album with a song called "Rubaiyat" on their album Let us Play! (1997). This song contains what appears to be some words from the English translation.[49] Jazz-soul harpist Dorothy Ashby's 1970 album The Rubaiyat of Dorothy Ashby quotes from several of the poem's verses. The famed "skull and roses" poster for a Grateful Dead show at the Avalon Ballroom done by Alton Kelley and Stanley Mouse was adapted from Edmund J. Sullivan's illustrations for The Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam.[50] The work influenced the 2004 concept album The Rubaiyyat of Omar Khayyam by the Italian group Milagro acustico [it].[51] The song "Beautiful Feeling" by Australian singer-songwriter Paul Kelly, on 2004 album Ways and Means, includes the lyrics "A jug of wine, a loaf of bread and thee, lying on a blanket underneath that big old spreading tree." This song was used as the theme song in the 2004 Australian television drama, Fireflies. The 1953 Robert Wright-George Forrest musical Kismet, adapted from a play by Edward Knoblock, contains a non-singing character, Omar (it is implied that he is the poet himself), who recites some of the couplets in the Fitzgerald translation. The record label Ruby Yacht gets its namesake, in part, from the Rubáiyát of Omar Khayyám. milo's album budding ornithologists are weary of tired analogies features a couple of references to the Rubaiyat. Television[edit] In one 6-episode story arc of The Rocky and Bullwinkle Show, Bullwinkle finds the "Ruby Yacht of Omar Khayyam" in the town of Frostbite Falls (on the shores of Veronica Lake). This pun is deemed so bad, the characters groan, and narrator William Conrad quips, "Well, you don't come up with an awful thing like that, and not hit the front page!" In the American television drama, Have Gun - Will Travel, the sixth episode of the sixth season is titled "The Bird of Time". The last lines are the main character, Paladin, quoting from Quatrain VII, "The Bird of Time has but a little way To flutter—and the Bird is on the Wing." A copy of the Rubaiyat plays a role in an episode of the TV series New Amsterdam and is shown to be the inspiration for the name of one of the lead character's children, Omar York. In the Australian 2014 television drama, Anzac Girls, Lieutenant Harry Moffitt reads from the Rubaiyat to his sweetheart, nurse Sister Alice Ross-King. In "The Moving Finger" episode of 'I Dream of Jeannie' Jeannie tries out to be a movie star and her screen test is her reciting the Rubaiyat Other media[edit] In Cyberflix's PC game Titanic: Adventure Out of Time, the object is to save three important items, the Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam, one of Adolf Hitler's paintings, and a notebook that proves German officials were attempting to gain geo-political advantage by instigating communist revolution. Finding the Rubaiyat will prevent World War I, as the book is used to fund the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand. Two passages from the book are also included in the game as clues to progress the narrative. Some versions of the computer game Colossal Cave Adventure feature a ruby-covered yacht called "Omar Khayyam" (a pun – the "ruby yacht" of Omar Khayyam). Other[edit] In Australia, a copy of FitzGerald's translation and its closing words, Tamam Shud ("Ended") were major components of the unsolved Tamam Shud case. The Supreme Court of the Philippines, through a unanimous opinion written in 2005 by Associate Justice Leonardo Quisumbing, quoted "The Moving Finger" when it ruled that the widow of defeated presidential candidate Fernando Poe Jr. could not substitute her late husband in his pending election protest against President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo, thus leading to the dismissal of the protest. There was a real jewel-encrusted copy of the book on the Titanic. It had been crafted in 1911 by the firm of Sangorski & Sutcliffe in London. It was won at a Sotheby's auction in London on 29 March 1912 for £405 (a bit over $2,000 in 1912) to Gabriel Weis, an American, and was being shipped to New York. The book remains lost at the bottom of the Atlantic to this day. Anniversary events[edit] 2009 marked the 150th anniversary of Fitzgerald's translation, and the 200th anniversary of Fitzgerald's birth. Events marking these anniversaries included: The Smithsonian's traveling exhibition Elihu Vedder's Drawings for the Rubaiyat at the Phoenix Art Museum, 15 November 2008 – 8 February 2009 The exhibition Edward Fitzgerald & The Rubaiyat from the collection of Nicholas B. Scheetz at the Grolier Club, 22 January – 13 March 2009. The exhibition Omar Khayyám. Een boek in de woestijn. 150 jaar in Engelse vertaling at the Museum Meermanno, The Hague, 31 January – 5 April 2009 The exhibition The Persian Sensation: The Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam in the West at the Harry Ransom Humanities Research Center at The University of Texas at Austin, 3 February – 2 August 2009 An exhibition at the Cleveland Public Library Special Collections, opening 15 February 2009 The joint conference, Omar Khayyam, Edward FitzGerald and The Rubaiyat, held at Cambridge University and Leiden University, 6–10 July 2009 The Folio Society published a limited edition (1,000 copies) of the Rubáiyát to mark the 150th anniversary.[52] See also[edit] Tamam Shud case Ubi sunt § In Persian poetry References[edit] ^ Yohannan, John D. (1977). Persian Poetry in England and America. Caravan Books. p. 202. ISBN 978-0-88206-006-4. ^ a b c Mehdi, Aminrazavi (2005). The Wine of Wisdom: The Life, Poetry and Philosophy of Omar Khayyam. Oneworld Publications. ISBN 978-1-85168-355-0. ^ a b c Edward Denison Ross, "Omar Khayyam", Bulletin of the School Of Oriental Studies, London Institution (1927) ^ a b c Ali Dashti (translated by L. P. Elwell-Sutton), In Search of Omar Khayyam, Routledge Library Editions: Iran (2012) ^ Francois De Blois, Persian Literature – A Bio-Bibliographical Survey: Poetry of the Pre-Mongol Period (2004), p. 307. ^ a b Bashiri, Iraj. "Sadeq Hedayat's Learning". Blind Owl. Retrieved 3 November 2017. ^ a b The Cambridge History of Iran, Volume 4. Cambridge University Press (1975): Richard Nelson Frye ^ MS. Ouseley 140, copied in 1460 in Shiraz, Persia, 47 folia. This is the oldest securely dated manuscript of Omar Khayyam's poetry. It belonged to William Ouseley (1767–1842) and was purchased by the Bodleian Library in 1844 ^ Preface to a facsimile of the first edition (no year [c. 1900], "from the fine copy owned by Charles Dana Burrage" [1857–1926]). ^ Davis, Dick. "FitzGerald, Edward". Encyclopædia Iranica. Retrieved 15 January 2017. ^ FitzGerald, E. (2010). Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam (p. 12). Champaign, Ill.: Project Gutenberg ^ "Sufis understood his poems outwardly and considered them to be part of their mystical tradition. In their sessions and gatherings, Khayyam's poems became the subject of conversation and discussion. His poems, however, are inwardly like snakes who bite the sharia [Islamic law] and are chains and handcuffs placed on religion. Once the people of his time had a taste of his faith, his secrets were revealed. Khayyam was frightened for his life, withdrew from writing, speaking and such like and traveled to Mecca. Once he arrived in Baghdad, members of a Sufi tradition and believers in primary sciences came to him and courted him. He did not accept them and after performing the pilgrimage returned to his native land, kept his secrets to himself and propagated worshiping and following the people of faith." cited after Aminrazavi (2007)[page needed] ^ "The writings of Omar Khayyam are good specimens of Sufism, but are not valued in the West as they ought to be, and the mass of English-speaking people know him only through the poems of Edward Fitzgerald. It is unfortunate because Fitzgerald is not faithful to his master and model, and at times he lays words upon the tongue of the Sufi which are blasphemous. Such outrageous language is that of the eighty-first quatrain for instance. Fitzgerald is doubly guilty because he was more of a Sufi than he was willing to admit." C. H. A. Bjerregaard, Sufism: Omar Khayyam and E. Fitzgerald, The Sufi Publishing Society (1915), p. 3 ^ "Every line of the Rubaiyat has more meaning than almost anything you could read in Sufi literature". Abdullah Dougan, Who is the Potter?, Gnostic Press 1991 ISBN 0-473-01064-X ^ "FitzGerald himself was confused about Omar. Sometimes he thought that he was a Sufi, sometimes not." Idries Shah, The Sufis, Octagon Press (1999), pp. 165–166 ^ Aminrazavi, Mehdi. "Umar Khayyam". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 3 November 2017. ^ Beveridge, H. (1905). XVIII. "Omar Khayyam". Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 37(3), 521–526. ^ Katouzian, H. (1991). Sadeq Hedayat: The life and literature of an Iranian writer (p. 138). London: I.B. Tauris ^ Ambrose George Potter, A Bibliography of the Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam (1929). ^ Francois De Blois, Persian Literature – A Bio-Bibliographical Survey: Poetry of the Pre-Mongol Period (2004), p. 312. ^ Christopher Decker (ed.), Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam / a critical edition , Charlottesville : University Press of Virginia, 1997, 2008. ^ A. J. Arberry (ed.), The Romance of the Rubáiyát : Edward Fitzgerald's First Edition reprinted with Introduction and Notes, Routledge, 2016. ^ Fitzgerald, Edward (2007). "Note by W. Aldis Wright". Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam. New Delhi: Rupa & Co. p. 132. ISBN 978-81-7167-439-8. ^ Michael Kearney (1888). "Biographical Preface". Rubáiyát of Omar Khayyám in English verse. By Omar Khayyam. Translated by Edward FitzGerald. New York and Boston: Houghton, Mifflin. p. 17. ^ "Arabiannights.org". Arabiannights.org. Archived from the original on 30 June 2015. Retrieved 11 April 2013. ^ The Ruba'iyat of Omar Khayyam : being a facsimile of the manuscript in the Bodleian Library at Oxford, with a transcript into modern Persian characters. Translated, with an introd. and notes, and a bibliography, and some sidelights upon Edward Fitzgerald's poem (1898). ^ Omar Khayyam, Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam, translated by Justin Huntly McCarthy MP. [London] : D. Nutt, 1889. (Source: Trinity College Dublin Library) ^ "An Anonymous Quatrain". Notes and Queries. 17 (8): 317–a–317. 1 August 1970. doi:10.1093/nq/17-8-317a. ISSN 1471-6941. ^ Raza, Rosemary Cargill (2004). "Cadell, Jessie Ellen (1844–1884)". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/4300. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.) ^ a b Irwin, Robert. "Omar Khayyam's Bible for drunkards". The Times Literary Supplement. Archived from the original on 18 March 2007. Retrieved 5 October 2008. ^ http://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/001005780 ^ Azarang, Abd-al Hussein. "Emami, Karim". Encyclopædia Iranica. iranicaonline.org. Retrieved 29 June 2012. ^ Emami, Karim. Ups and Downs of Translation, Tehran, 1988, pp. 134–169 ^ a b Rubaije Omera Hajjama (in Serbian) ^ a b c d e Omar Khayyam. Rubaiyat. Translated by Ryosaku Ogawa (小川亮作, Ogawa Ryosaku). Iwanami Shoten, 1949 (revised ed. in 1979), pp. 167–73. ISBN 978-4003278314. ^ "図書カード:ルバイヤート". Aozora.gr.jp. 21 July 2006. Retrieved 11 April 2013. ^ "Logo". Meltha.dk. Retrieved 11 April 2013. ^ Khayyam, Omar; Khinno, Eshaya Elisha (2012). Rubaiyat of Omar Khayam: A Translation Into Assyrian Language Plus Other ... – Omar Khayyam, Eshaya Elisha Khinno – Google Books. ISBN 9780646543147. Retrieved 11 April 2013. ^ "Web of the Galician Culture Council". Culturagalega.org. Retrieved 11 April 2013. ^ "Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam". Odia Book Bazar. 2015. Retrieved 26 September 2015. ^ Jeffrey D. Lavoie, The Private Life of General Omar N. Bradley (2015), p. 13. ^ Michael Kimmel, Christine Milrod, Amanda Kennedy, Cultural Encyclopedia of the Penis (2014), p. 93. ^ Molavi, Afshin, The Soul of Iran, Norton, (2005), p. 110f. ^ "The Handbook of Hymen by O. Henry". Literaturecollection.com. Archived from the original on 11 April 2013. Retrieved 11 April 2013. ^ "Old Fashioned American Humor". Old Fashioned American Humor. 6 March 2013. Retrieved 11 April 2013. ^ "oldfineart.com". oldfineart.com. Archived from the original on 5 October 2011. Retrieved 11 April 2013. ^ "Principia Discordia, the book of Chaos, Discord and Confusion". Principiadiscordia.com. Retrieved 11 April 2013. ^ Cooper, Miriam (1973). Dark Lady of the Silents. Bobbs Merrill. p. 104. ISBN 0672517256. ^ "See album". Retrieved 11 April 2013. ^ Selvin, Joel. "Alton Kelley, psychedelic poster creator, dies". San Francisco Chronicle. 3 June 2008. Retrieved 2008-06-25. ^ "The Rubaiyyat of Omar Khayyam". Valley Entertainment-Hearts of Space Records. Retrieved 23 June 2010. ^ Edward FitzGerald. "Rubáiyát of Omar Khayyám | Folio Illustrated Book". Foliosociety.com. Archived from the original on 27 February 2012. Retrieved 11 April 2013. William Mason, Sandra Martin, The Art of Omar Khayyam: Illustrating FitzGerald's Rubaiyat (2007). Further reading[edit] Sharifian, Farzad (2020). "Cultural Linguistics and Poetry: The Case of Khayyām's Rubā'iyyāt". International Journal of Persian Literature. 5: 21–39. doi:10.5325/intejperslite.5.0021. External links[edit] Wikimedia Commons has media related to Rubáiyát of Omar Khayyám. Wikiquote has quotations related to: Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam Wikisource has original text related to this article: Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam Wikisource has original text related to this article: Rubáiyát of Omar Khayyám (Le Gallienne) FitzGerald Bibliography of editions (omarkhayyamnederland.com) List of editions (WorldCat) The Rubáiyát of Omar Khayyám public domain audiobook at LibriVox The illustrated Rubáiyát of Omar Khayyám, translated by Edward Fitzgerald, at Internet Archive. The Persian Poet, contains the translations by Edward FitzGerald and a biography. Project Gutenberg: etext#246 (translation by Edward FitzGerald) The Rubáiyát of Omar Khayyám at Faded Page (Canada) The entire book in DNL E-Book format. The complete four edition translations by Edward FitzGerald, with illustrations by Blanche McManus at Kellscraft.com. Other Database of manuscripts of the Rubáiyát of Omar Khayyám (cam.ac.uk) Graves and Ali-Shah. Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam a collection of rubaiyat in Persian, accompanied by several translations into English and German. A comparison between the translations by Heron-Allen and Talbot. Syracuse University's Special Collections Research Center has in its Rare Books holdings more than 300 different editions of the Rubaiyat The Harry Ransom Center at the University of Texas at Austin holds over 1,500 items related to the Rubaiyat, including two copies of the first edition, hundreds of editions, translations, and parodies, several Persian manuscripts containing rubaiyat, and ephemera, manuscripts and correspondence documenting the phenomenon of "Omariana" Toussaint's Translation (French) v t e Persian literature Old Behistun Inscription Old Persian inscriptions Ganjnameh Inscription of Xerxes the Great in Van Fortress Achaemenid inscription in the Kharg Island Middle Ayadgar-i Zariran Counsels of Adurbad-e Mahrspandan Dēnkard Book of Jamasp Book of Arda Viraf Karnamak-i Artaxshir-i Papakan Cube of Zoroaster Dana-i Menog Khrat Shabuhragan of Mani Shahrestanha-ye Eranshahr Bundahishn Menog-i Khrad Jamasp Namag Dadestan-i Denig Anthology of Zadspram Warshtmansr Zand-i Wahman yasn Drakht-i Asurig Shikand-gumanig Vizar Classical 900s Rudaki Daqiqi Ferdowsi (Shahnameh) Abu Shakur Balkhi Abu Tahir Khosrovani Shahid Balkhi Bal'ami Rabia Balkhi Abusaeid Abolkheir (967–1049) Avicenna (980–1037) Unsuri Asjadi Kisai Marvazi Ayyuqi 1000s Bābā Tāher Nasir Khusraw (1004–1088) Al-Ghazali (1058–1111) Khwaja Abdullah Ansari (1006–1088) Asadi Tusi Qatran Tabrizi (1009–1072) Nizam al-Mulk (1018–1092) Masud Sa'd Salman (1046–1121) Moezi Neyshapuri Omar Khayyām (1048–1131) Fakhruddin As'ad Gurgani Ahmad Ghazali Hujwiri Manuchehri Ayn-al-Quzat Hamadani (1098–1131) Uthman Mukhtari Abu-al-Faraj Runi Sanai Banu Goshasp Borzu-Nama Afdal al-Din Kashani Abu'l Hasan Mihyar al-Daylami Mu'izzi Mahsati Ganjavi 1100s Hakim Iranshah Suzani Samarqandi Hassan Ghaznavi Faramarz Nama Shahab al-Din Suhrawardi (1155–1191) Adib Sabir Falaki Shirvani Am'aq Najm al-Din Razi Attār (1142–c.1220) Khaghani (1120–1190) Anvari (1126–1189) Faramarz-e Khodadad Nizami Ganjavi (1141–1209) Fakhr al-Din al-Razi (1149–1209) Kamal al-Din Esfahani Shams Tabrizi (d.1248) 1200s Abu Tahir Tarsusi Awhadi Maraghai Shams al-Din Qays Razi Sultan Walad Nasīr al-Dīn al-Tūsī Afdal al-Din Kashani Fakhr-al-Din Iraqi Mahmud Shabistari (1288–1320s) Abu'l Majd Tabrizi Amir Khusro (1253–1325) Saadi (Bustan / Golestān) Bahram-e-Pazhdo Pur-Baha Jami Zartosht Bahram e Pazhdo Rumi Homam Tabrizi (1238–1314) Nozhat al-Majales Khwaju Kermani Sultan Walad Badr Shirvani Zu'l-Fiqar Shirvani 1300s Ibn Yamin Shah Ni'matullah Wali Hafez Abu Ali Qalandar Fazlallah Astarabadi Nasimi Emad al-Din Faqih Kermani 1400s Ubayd Zakani Salman Sawaji Hatefi Jami Kamal Khujandi Ahli Shirazi (1454–1535) Fuzûlî (1483–1556) Ismail I (1487–1524) Baba Faghani 1500s Vahshi Bafqi (1523–1583) Muhtasham Kashani (1500–1588) 'Orfi Shirazi 1600s Taleb Amoli Saib Tabrizi (1607–1670) Kalim Kashani Hazin Lāhiji (1692–1766) Saba Kashani Abdul-Qādir Bēdil (1642–1720) Naw'i Khabushani Mohammad Qoli Salim Tehrani Rasa Salim Tehrani 1700s Neshat Esfahani Abbas Foroughi Bastami (1798–1857) 1800s Mahmud Saba Kashani (1813–1893) Mirza Ghalib (1797-1869) Zeynalabdin Shirvani (1780-1838) Reza-Qoli Khan Hedayat Qaani Contemporary Poetry Iran Ahmadreza Ahmadi Mehdi Akhavan-Sales Hormoz Alipour Qeysar Aminpour Mohammad Reza Aslani Aref Qazvini Ahmad NikTalab Manouchehr Atashi Mahmoud Mosharraf Azad Tehrani Mohammad-Taqi Bahar Reza Baraheni Simin Behbahani Dehkhoda Hushang Ebtehaj Bijan Elahi Parviz Eslampour Parvin E'tesami Forough Farrokhzad Hossein Monzavi Hushang Irani Iraj Mirza Bijan Jalali Siavash Kasraie Esmail Khoi Shams Langeroodi Mohammad Mokhtari Nosrat Rahmani Yadollah Royaee Tahereh Saffarzadeh Sohrab Sepehri Mohammad-Reza Shafiei Kadkani Mohammad-Hossein Shahriar Ahmad Shamlou Manouchehr Sheybani Nima Yooshij Fereydoon Moshiri Armenia Edward Haghverdian Afghanistan Nadia Anjuman Wasef Bakhtari Raziq Faani Khalilullah Khalili Youssof Kohzad Massoud Nawabi Abdul Ali Mustaghni Tajikistan Sadriddin Ayni Farzona Iskandar Khatloni Abolqasem Lahouti Gulrukhsor Safieva Loiq Sher-Ali Payrav Sulaymoni Mirzo Tursunzoda Uzbekistan Asad Gulzoda India Muhammad Iqbal Novels Ali Mohammad Afghani Ghazaleh Alizadeh Bozorg Alavi Reza Amirkhani Mahshid Amirshahi Reza Baraheni Simin Daneshvar Mahmoud Dowlatabadi Soudabeh Fazaeli Reza Ghassemi Houshang Golshiri Aboutorab Khosravi Ahmad Mahmoud Shahriyar Mandanipour Abbas Maroufi Iraj Pezeshkzad Short stories Jalal Al-e-Ahmad Shamim Bahar Sadeq Chubak Simin Daneshvar Nader Ebrahimi Ebrahim Golestan Houshang Golshiri Sadegh Hedayat Mohammad-Ali Jamalzadeh Aboutorab Khosravi Mostafa Mastoor Jaafar Modarres-Sadeghi Houshang Moradi Kermani Bijan Najdi Shahrnush Parsipur Gholam-Hossein Sa'edi Bahram Sadeghi Goli Taraqqi Plays Reza Abdoh Mirza Fatali Akhundzadeh Mohsen Yalfani Bahram Beyzai Bahman Forsi Amir Reza Koohestani Alireza Koushk Jalali Gholam-Hossein Sa'edi Bijan Mofid Hengameh Mofid Abbas Nalbandian Akbar Radi Pari Saberi Mirza Aqa Tabrizi Mohammad Yaghoubi Screenplays Saeed Aghighi Mohammad Reza Aslani Rakhshan Bani-E'temad Bahram Beyzai Hajir Darioush Pouran Derakhshandeh Asghar Farhadi Bahman Farmanara Farrokh Ghaffari Behrouz Gharibpour Bahman Ghobadi Fereydun Gole Ebrahim Golestan Ali Hatami Abolfazl Jalili Ebrahim Hatamikia Abdolreza Kahani Varuzh Karim-Masihi Samuel Khachikian Abbas Kiarostami Majid Majidi Mohsen Makhmalbaf Dariush Mehrjui Reza Mirkarimi Rasoul Mollagholipour Amir Naderi Jafar Panahi Kambuzia Partovi Fereydoun Rahnema Rasul Sadr Ameli Mohammad Sadri Parviz Shahbazi Sohrab Shahid-Saless Translators Amrollah Abjadian Jaleh Amouzgar Najaf Daryabandari Mohammad Ghazi Lili Golestan Sadegh Hedayat Saleh Hosseini Ahmad Kamyabi Mask Mohammad Moin Ebrahim Pourdavoud Hamid Samandarian Jalal Sattari Jafar Shahidi Ahmad Shamlou Ahmad Tafazzoli Abbas Zaryab Essayists Aydin Aghdashloo Mohammad Ebrahim Bastani Parizi Ehsan Yarshater Contemporary Persian and Classical Persian are the same language, but writers since 1900 are classified as contemporary. At one time, Persian was a common cultural language of much of the non-Arabic Islamic world. Today it is the official language of Iran, Tajikistan and one of the two official languages of Afghanistan. Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rubaiyat_of_Omar_Khayyam&oldid=996454498" Categories: 1859 books Persian poems Omar Khayyam 1859 poems 1872 poems 1889 poems Victorian culture Fin de siècle Orientalism Hidden categories: Wikipedia articles needing page number citations from September 2017 Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the ODNB Articles with Serbian-language sources (sr) Articles containing Japanese-language text Articles with short description Short description matches Wikidata Use dmy dates from June 2015 Articles containing Arabic-language text Articles needing cleanup from September 2017 All pages needing cleanup Cleanup tagged articles with a reason field from September 2017 Wikipedia pages needing cleanup from September 2017 All accuracy disputes Articles with disputed statements from November 2020 All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from September 2017 Articles with disputed statements from September 2017 Articles needing the year an event occurred from September 2017 Articles with trivia sections from September 2017 All articles with trivia sections Commons category link is on Wikidata Articles with LibriVox links Articles with Project Gutenberg links AC with 0 elements Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikisource Languages العربية অসমীয়া বাংলা Bân-lâm-gú Català Español Euskara فارسی Français Galego 한국어 Bahasa Indonesia Interlingua Italiano ಕನ್ನಡ മലയാളം Bahasa Melayu 日本語 Polski Português Русский සිංහල کوردی Svenska ไทย Тоҷикӣ Türkçe Українська Tiếng Việt Walon 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 26 December 2020, at 18:36 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2648 ---- Talk:Horace - Wikipedia Talk:Horace From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Horace has been listed as a level-4 vital article in People. If you can improve it, please do. This article has been rated as B-Class.           This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: WikiProject Biography (Rated B-class) Biography portal v t e This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles  B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.   WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome (Rated B-class, High-importance) v t e This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles  B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.  High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.   WikiProject Poetry (Rated B-class, High-importance) Poetry portal v t e This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles  B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.  High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.   A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on November 27, 2017. Contents 1 Debt to the Greeks 2 carpe diem 3 Stuart Lyons book 4 Link to Jon Corelis translation 5 First English Translation 6 Horace's Villa 7 Page move and merge proposals 8 Rearrangement 9 Horace's sayings 10 New edit 11 bugger the tag 12 Kiernan's Marxist irrelevancies 13 Kipling's "parodies" 14 Amaryllis and Neaera 15 Do-re-mi Debt to the Greeks[edit] horace was a great poet and philosepher, how did he help rome in any way? Hi. I'm still learning here so apologies if I'm not doing things right. The observation that Horace was derivative of the Greeks is true with respect to meter, but that's also true of all Latin poets. The comment could be interpreted as a negative comment on his originality, which I think is transparently unfair and so I deleted it. No Greek poet published an ars poetica like Horace's. With regard to satire, moreover, he took a largely indigenous form created (as best we can tell) by Lucilius, modified it significantly and made it his own. While Horace has many debts to the Greeks, the standard rap on Romans that they stole everything from the Greeks is unfair, and particularly unfair in Horace's case. Thanks for listening! MaggieTMaggieT 14:26, 15 February 2006 (UTC) Maggie T is absolutely right; I edited some of the language to reflect that. I also deleted some inaccurate characterizations of the Odes and Epodes. Ron Kane 3/10/06. "While Horace has many debts to the Greeks, the standard rap on Romans that they stole everything from the Greeks is unfair, and particularly unfair in Horace's case." There seems to be someone who disagrees with you... "Graecia capta ferum victorem cepit et artis intulit agresti Latio." "Conquered Greece took captive her savage conqueror and brought her arts into rustic Latium." Horace, Book II, epistle i, lines 156-157 Lets respect Horace's own words... As for Horace himself, I cannot disagree with your opinion since I have not studied his work on a degree that would allow me to give an informed opinion. --RememberHistory (talk) 22:15, 14 October 2010 (UTC) carpe diem[edit] Isn't carpe diem "pluck the day" or "savor the day"? I thought carpere means "to pluck" or "to savor", as we get the English word carp, to complain. I have a growing suspicion that "seize the day", although popular, is an incorrect translation. Chase 66.141.177.116 22:45, 22 January 2007 (UTC) Transferred, it means "enjoy". Literally carpe does mean "you must pluck", but as a phrase with diem it correctly means "enjoy the day". Amphytrite 18:32, 11 April 2007 (UTC) Actually seize seems exactly right to me, the feeling is 'don't hang about wasting your time, there's not much of it'. Well employed in the film Dead Poets Society. And the Oxford Latin Dictionary, no less, gives "pluck, seize, (things considered as fruits and often transitory in nature)". John Wheater 09:16, 3 June 2007 (UTC) Stuart Lyons book[edit] I removed the reference to Stuart Lyons' book - it's more relevant to the Guido of Arezzo page (where it has also appeared) and, if one wishes to add a bibliography, there are plenty of other books which are of greater significance. Cassian 05:53, 13 May 2007 (UTC) Link to Jon Corelis translation[edit] I am inclined to remove this external link to what seems to me a poor translation. It was added by the mysterious 'Villager' on 20Nov06. I thought of replacing it with a link to Housman's translation of Ode 4.7, Diffugere nives. Does anyone feel the Corelis should be left in? Villager's talk page contains only notifications of auto-removals, so maybe he is inclined to special pleading. John Wheater 09:05, 3 June 2007 (UTC) I agree with you. There's no reason to link to a non-notable translation of a single Ode. Housman's translation could reasonably be included, though I would rather place all links specific to the Odes at Odes (Horace) than here. EALacey 18:11, 28 June 2007 (UTC) I've added a link to James Michie's marvellous translation of 1964. Michie recently died, & surely deserves an article: does anyone feel liking starting one? --NigelG (or Ndsg) | Talk 12:16, 21 November 2007 (UTC) First English Translation[edit] From the wikipedia article on Horace: "Ars Poetica was first translated into English by Queen Elizabeth I." From the wikipedia article Ars Poetica: "Ars Poetica (also known as "The Art of Poetry", Epistula Ad Pisones, or Letters to Piso) was a treatise on poetics. It was first translated into English by Ben Jonson." Which one is it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.208.117.40 (talk) 19:48, 11 January 2008 (UTC) Neither. In 1567 Thomas Drant's was the first English translation to be published. The Queen's translation was presumably not put on sale to the public. NRPanikker (talk) 03:03, 29 January 2012 (UTC) Horace's Villa[edit] has anyone considered writing or creating an article about Horace's villa? There have been extensive excavations which can be read about here, and the remains of which can be seen even in Google maps here. As one can see, they are quite extensive. Surely there is something to be said about them? It isn't often such ruins are properly identified with their owners, especially of such moment as Horace. Just a thought... Cjcaesar (talk) 00:20, 3 July 2008 (UTC) See Horace's Villa. Camenae (talk) 14:29, 18 October 2009 (UTC) Page move and merge proposals[edit] The articles on Horace and his works need quite a lot of attention. As a modest beginning, I have suggested that two names be changed in order to conform with regular English language usage. No one as yet has commented on these proposals, perhaps because few editors watch these articles. I thought I might have better luck here. Horatians: please note the proposals hic and illic. Camenae (talk) 00:41, 12 October 2009 (UTC) I have moved Epistularum liber primus to Epistles (Horace) and merged Sermonum liber primus and secundus under the new name Satires (Horace). Camenae (talk) 14:29, 18 October 2009 (UTC) Rearrangement[edit] Obviously the article needs works, and what is really missing is any in-depth discussion of Horace's works. For this reason, I propose moving the Works section before the Influence section and greatly expanding. Any objections? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dt barber (talk • contribs) 17:21, 9 February 2010 (UTC) This page needs rewriting as well as rearranging. Half of the sentences make the ones that immediately follow them gibberish. 134.139.21.196 (talk) 23:19, 3 May 2010 (UTC) Horace's sayings[edit] I think an article dedicated simply to Horace's catchy sayings would be a good addition - people might consult such an article when looking for quotes. Generally speaking, it's sad to see Horace in such neglect here at WP. I write this as a passer-by with no intention of doing anything about it myself - at least not yet. Amphitryoniades (talk) 02:03, 10 May 2010 (UTC) Actually, looking at things through new eyes, an article on H's catchy sayings now seems to me premature, bearing in mind the continuing nakedness of the existing articles dedicated to H and his work. Where is everyone? If you saw a beggar this naked you would give him a cloak, but one of the greatest poets of all time gets just a few rags. I'll get round to doing something for him within a year if nobody else does. McCronion (talk) 11:09, 17 July 2011 (UTC) Why bother? The current article here is rated pretty well, compared to many others I've seen: Trustworthy 3 (20 votes) Objective 3.3 (19 votes) Complete 2.6 (20 votes) Well Written 3.4 (21 votes) Eyeless in Gaza (talk) 23:35, 17 December 2011 (UTC) New edit[edit] Time something was done here. I'll start with the reception, which I think should end up being at least half the article, considering H's importance in European literature. Then I'll spread out from from there, like the wisteria in my sainted mother's garden, or the unknown vine that keeps strangling her citrus trees, except I won't be a nuisance. The reception will probably take me a couple of weeks, a bit every day. The rest of the garden will probably be a more chronic project, especially since I have my own life and property to manage, and my tractor's generator has gone phut. Texts so far: Stephen Harrison (ed), A Companion to Latin Literature, Blackwell Publishing (2008) Stephen Harrison (ed), A Cambridge Companion to Horace, Cambridge University Press (2007) V.G.Kiernan, Horace: Poetics and Politics, St Martin's Press (1999) David Mankin (ed), Horace: Epodes, Cambridge University Press (1995) I'll also try to get some older, more 'classic' criticism cheap from the net, and use Google Previews etc. This is another McRap Project project! Eyeless in Gaza (talk) 06:46, 1 January 2012 (UTC) Fed up with this crap now. Gone fishing instead! Eyeless in Gaza (talk) 00:56, 18 January 2012 (UTC) bugger the tag[edit] I removed this tag because I haven't finished editing. People can reinstate it after I'm done, if it's still necessary. Otherwise it invites busy-bodies and leads to edit-conflicts. Thanks. McCnut (talk) 05:30, 2 February 2012 (UTC) {{wikify}} I'm done now. I leave all my work to WP, as Horace left everything to the emperor. Do with it whatever you like. Me and Horace are past caring. McCnut (talk) 13:00, 12 February 2012 (UTC) Kiernan's Marxist irrelevancies[edit] I removed a portion of the following from the section on Horace's education in Athens. Rome's troubles following the assassination of Julius Ceaser were soon to catch up with him. Marcus Junius Brutus came to Athens seeking support for a republican cause that was bereft of ideas – the much-vaunted ideal of liberty was actually irrelevant in a conflict between elites.[26] The Athenians had a tradition of honouring tyrannicides, as types of their own heroes Harmodius and Aristogeiton, beside whose statues Brutus and his colleague Cassius were, by a popular decree, to be immortalized in bronze too. This article draws entirely too much from Kiernan's book, which is more about his political ideas than it is about Horace. I will trim more when I have time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.247.134.188 (talk) 13:30, 29 August 2012 (UTC) Kipling's "parodies"[edit] The sentence " Kipling wrote a famous parody of the Odes ..." : what does it refer to? The "Q. Horatii Flacci Carminum liber quintus" (Oxonii, Blackwell, 1920), a collection of Horatian imitations by a group of friends, is partly (in view of the title, of the pseudo-scholarly preface, etc.) a spoof, but not a "parody" in the sense of mocking or satirizing; and the same seems to me to be true of Kipling's "Horatian" poems in his Debits and Credits.Svato (talk) 17:18, 22 February 2013 (UTC) Amaryllis and Neaera[edit] This may not be the right place to put this question, but I can find no relevant references to Amaryllis (mythology, I presume), apart from citations of Milton's poem, which do not explain who Amaryllis is. References to Neaera are opaque, as regards to Milton's citation. I am a naif in this area. I didn't find google to be particularly helpful. Certainly there are contributors who know this, just off hand. Thank you! Detail guy 18:38, 30 April 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crbeals (talk • contribs) Do-re-mi[edit] Isn't solfege do-re-mi not from Horace, but from a hymn to St. John? The syllables were originally ut-re-mi-fa-sol-la-si, which are first syllables (or letters) of the hymn's semi-verses: ut queant laxis / resonare fibris / mira gestorum / famuli tuorum / solve polluti / labii reatum / sancte Iohannes (this is sapphic stophe of course). 212.87.13.78 (talk) 13:51, 9 May 2013 (UTC) Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Horace&oldid=812463705" Categories: Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in People Wikipedia B-Class vital articles in People Wikipedia B-Class level-4 vital articles B-Class biography articles WikiProject Biography articles B-Class Classical Greece and Rome articles High-importance Classical Greece and Rome articles B-Class Poetry articles High-importance Poetry articles WikiProject Poetry articles Selected anniversaries (November 2017) Hidden categories: All Wikipedia vital articles All Wikipedia level-4 vital articles All Wikipedia vital articles in People All Wikipedia B-Class vital articles Selected anniversaries articles Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit New section View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages This page was last edited on 28 November 2017, at 00:02 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2650 ---- Roman dictator - Wikipedia Roman dictator From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Extraordinary magistrate of the Roman Republic Ancient Rome This article is part of a series on the politics and government of ancient Rome Periods Roman Kingdom 753–509 BC Roman Republic 509–27 BC Roman Empire 27 BC – AD 395 Principate 27 BC – AD 284 Dominate AD 284–641 Western AD 395–476 Eastern AD 395–1453 Timeline Roman Constitution Constitution of the Kingdom Constitution of the Republic Constitution of the Empire Constitution of the Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Executive magistrates Precedent and law Roman law Ius Imperium Mos maiorum Collegiality Auctoritas Roman citizenship Cursus honorum Senatus consultum Senatus consultum ultimum Assemblies Centuriate Curiate Plebeian Tribal Ordinary magistrates Consul Praetor Quaestor Promagistrate Aedile Tribune Censor Governor Extraordinary magistrates Corrector Dictator Magister equitum Consular tribune Rex Triumviri Decemviri Titles and honours Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Praeses Praefectus Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Other countries v t e A dictator was a magistrate of the Roman Republic, entrusted with the full authority of the state to deal with a military emergency or to undertake a specific duty. All other magistrates were subordinate to his imperium, and the right of the plebeian tribunes to veto his actions or of the people to appeal from them was extremely limited. In order to prevent the dictatorship from threatening the state itself, severe limitations were placed upon its powers, as a dictator could only act within his intended sphere of authority, and was obliged to resign his office once his appointed task had been accomplished, or at the expiration of six months. Dictators were frequently appointed from the earliest period of the Republic down to the Second Punic War (218–201 BC), but the magistracy then went into abeyance for over a century, until it was revived in a significantly modified form, first by Sulla between 82 and 79 BC, and then by Julius Caesar between 49 and 44 BC. The office was formally abolished after the death of Caesar, and not revived under the Empire.[1][2][3] Contents 1 Origin 2 Nomination 3 Insignia 4 Powers and limitations 5 Magister equitum 6 Decline and disappearance 6.1 Dictatorship revived 6.2 Abolition 7 List of Roman dictators 8 See also 9 Footnotes 10 References 11 Bibliography Origin[edit] With the abolition of the Roman monarchy in 509 BC, the imperium, or executive power, of the king was divided between two annually-elected magistrates, known as praetors. In time they would come to be known as consuls, although probably not until the creation of a third, junior praetor in 367 BC.[4] Neither consul was superior to the other, and the decisions of one could be appealed to the other (provocatio). Their insignia were the toga praetexta and the sella curulis, and each was attended by an escort of twelve lictors, each of whom bore the fasces, a bundle of rods topped by an axe; but by custom the lictors had to remove the axes from their fasces within the pomerium, the sacred boundary of Rome, to signify that the people, and not the consuls, were sovereign.[5] After several years,[i] the fear of impending war with both the Sabines and the Latin League, combined with widespread suspicion that one or both of the consuls favoured the restoration of the monarchy, led to the call for a praetor maximus, or dictator ("one who gives orders"), akin to the supreme magistrate of other Latin towns.[7][2] According to most authorities, the first dictator was Titus Lartius in 501 BC, who appointed Spurius Cassius his magister equitum.[7][ii] Although there are indications that the term praetor maximus may have been used in the earliest period,[iii] the official title of the dictator throughout the history of the Republic was magister populi, or "master of the infantry". His lieutenant, the magister equitum, was the "master of the horse" (that is, of the cavalry[iv]). However, the use of dictator to refer to the magister populi seems to have been widespread from a very early period.[2][11] Nomination[edit] The appointment of a dictator involved three steps: first, the Senate would issue a decree known as a senatus consultum, authorizing one of the consuls to nominate a dictator. Technically, a senatus consultum was advisory, and did not have the force of law, but in practice it was nearly always followed.[v] Either consul could nominate a dictator. If both consuls were available, the dictator was chosen by agreement; if they could not agree, the consuls would draw lots for the responsibility.[13] Finally, the Comitia Curiata would be called upon to confer imperium on the dictator through the passage of a law known as a lex curiata de imperio.[1][2][11] A dictator could be nominated for different reasons, or causa. The three most common were rei gerundae causa, "for the matter to be done", used in the case of dictators appointed to hold a military command against a specific enemy; comitiorum habendorum causa, for holding the comitia, or elections, when the consuls were unable to do so; and clavi figendi causa, an important religious rite involving the driving of a nail into the wall of the Temple of Jupiter Optimus Maximus, as a protection against pestilence.[vi][2][11] Other reasons included seditionis sedandae causa ("to quell sedition"); ferarium constituendarum causa (to establish a religious holiday in response to a dreadful portent[vii]); ludorum faciendorum causa (to hold the Ludi Romani, or "Roman Games", an ancient religious festival); quaestionibus exercendis, (to investigate certain actions);[16] and in one extraordinary case, senatus legendi causa, to fill up the ranks of the Senate after the Battle of Cannae.[17][18] These reasons could be combined (seditionis sedandae et rei gerundae causa), but are not always recorded or clearly stated in ancient authorities, and must instead be inferred.[19] In the earlier period it was customary to nominate someone whom the consul considered the best available military commander; often this was a former consul, but this was never required. However, from 360 BC onward, the dictators were usually consulares.[2][viii] Normally there was only one dictator at a time, although a new dictator could be appointed following the resignation of another.[ix] A dictator could be compelled to resign his office without accomplishing his task or serving out his term if there were found to be a fault in the auspices under which he had been nominated.[22][23] Insignia[edit] Like other curule magistrates, the dictator was entitled to the toga praetexta and the sella curulis. He received a ceremonial bodyguard that was unique in Roman tradition: "[t]wenty-four lictors indicated his quasi-regal power, which, however, was rather a concentration of the consular authority than a limited revival of the kingship."[2][x] In a notable exception to the Roman reluctance to reconstitute the symbols of the kings, the lictors of the dictator never removed the axes from their fasces, even within the pomerium. Symbolizing their power over life and death, the axes of a dictator's lictors set him apart from all other magistrates.[1] In an extraordinary sign of deference, the lictors of other magistrates could not bear fasces at all when appearing before the dictator.[24] As the kings had been accustomed to appear on horseback, this right was forbidden to the dictator, unless he first received permission from the comitia.[25][26][11] Powers and limitations[edit] Roman Dictator Quintus Fabius Maximus Verrucosus In addition to holding a military command and carrying out the actions decreed by the Senate, a dictator could summon the Senate or convene one of the legislative assemblies of the Roman people. The full extent of the dictatorial power was considerable, but not unlimited. It was circumscribed by the conditions of a dictator's appointment, as well as by the evolving traditions of Roman law, and to a considerable degree depended on the dictator's ability to work together with other magistrates. The precise limitations of this power were not sharply defined, but subject to debate, contention, and speculation throughout Roman history.[27] In the pursuit of his causa, the dictator's authority was nearly absolute. However, as a rule he could not exceed the mandate for which he was appointed; a dictator nominated to hold the comitia could not then take up a military command against the wishes of the Senate.[xi][xii] Some dictators appointed to a military command also performed other duties, such as holding the comitia, or driving a nail into the wall of the Temple of Jupiter Optimus Maximus; but presumably they did so with the Senate's consent.[30][31] The imperium of the other magistrates was not vacated by the nomination of a dictator. They continued to perform the duties of their office, although subject to the dictator's authority, and continued in office until the expiration of their year, by which time the dictator had typically resigned.[2][24] It is uncertain whether a dictator's imperium could extend beyond that of the consul by whom he was nominated; Mommsen believed that his imperium would cease together with that of the nominating magistrate, but others have suggested that it could continue beyond the end of the civil year; and in fact there are several examples in which a dictator appears to have entered a new year without any consuls at all, although some scholars doubt the authenticity of these dictator years.[32][33][11] Initially a dictator's power was not subject to either provocatio, the right to appeal from the decision of a magistrate, or intercessio, the veto of the tribunes of the plebs.[34][35][1][2][24] However, the lex Valeria, establishing the right of appeal, was not abrogated by the appointment of a dictator, and by 300 BC even the dictator was subject to provocatio, at least within the city of Rome.[36][2][24] There is also evidence that the power of the plebeian tribunes was not vitiated by the dictator's commands, and 210 BC, the tribunes threatened to prevent elections held by the dictator, Quintus Fulvius Flaccus, unless he agreed to withdraw his name from the list of candidates for the consulship.[37][38][24][xiii] A dictator was expected to resign his office upon the successful completion of the task for which he was appointed, or at the expiration of six months.[1][2] These sharp limitations were intended to prevent the dictatorship from too closely resembling the absolute power of the Roman kings.[2] But the six month limitation may have been dispensed with when the Senate deemed it expedient; no consuls are known for the years 333, 324, 309, and 301, and it is reported that the dictator and magister equitum continued in office without any consuls.[33] Most authorities hold that a dictator could not be held to account for his actions after resigning his office, the prosecution of Marcus Furius Camillus for misappropriating the spoils of Veii being exceptional, as perhaps was that of Lucius Manlius Capitolinus in 362,[xiv] which was dropped only because his son, Titus,[xv] threatened the life of the tribune who had undertaken the prosecution.[40][1] However, some scholars suggest that the dictator was only immune from prosecution during his term of office, and could theoretically be called to answer charges of corruption.[24] Magister equitum[edit] Main article: Magister equitum The dictator's lieutenant was the magister equitum, or "master of the horse". He would be nominated by the dictator immediately upon his own appointment, and unless the senatus consultum specified the name of the person to be appointed, the dictator was free to choose whomever he wished.[1][2] It was customary for the dictator to nominate a magister equitum even if he were appointed for a non-military reason. Before the time of Caesar, the only dictator who refused to nominate a magister equitum was Marcus Fabius Buteo in 216 BC, and he strenuously objected to his own nomination, because there was already a dictator in the field.[17] Like the dictator, the magister equitum was a curule magistrate, entitled to the toga praetexta and the sella curulis. His imperium was equivalent to that of a praetor (in the later use of the term), in that he was accompanied by six lictors, half the number accorded to the consuls. But like the dictator, he could summon the Senate, and probably also the popular assemblies. His authority was not subject to recall, although if the dictator were compelled to resign due to a fault in the auspices, the magister equitum was also expected to resign, and when the dictator laid down his imperium, so would the magister equitum.[27] In theory, the magister equitum was commander of the cavalry, but he was not limited to that role. The dictator and magister equitum did not always take the field together; in some instances the magister equitum was assigned the defense of the city while the dictator took an army into the field, while on other occasions the dictator remained at Rome to see to some important duty, and entrusted the magister equitum with an army in the field.[2] The magister equitum was necessarily subordinate to the dictator, although this did not always prevent the two from disagreeing.[27][xvi] Decline and disappearance[edit] During the first two centuries of the Republic, the dictatorship served as an expedient means by which a powerful magistracy could be created quickly in order to deal with extraordinary situations.[11] Created for military emergencies, the office could also be used to suppress sedition and prevent the growing number of plebeians from obtaining greater political power.[11] In the Conflict of the Orders, the dictator could generally be counted upon to support the patrician aristocracy, since he was always a patrician, and was nominated by consuls who were exclusively patrician. After the lex Licinia Sextia gave plebeians the right to hold one of the annual consulships, a series of dictators were appointed in order to hold elections, with the apparent goal of electing two patrician consuls, in violation of the Licinian law.[41][xvii] After the Second Samnite War, the dictatorship was relegated almost exclusively to domestic activities. No dictator was nominated during the Third Samnite War, and the six-month limitation on its powers made the dictatorship impractical for campaigns beyond the Italian peninsula.[2][27] In 249 BC, Aulus Atilius Calatinus became the only dictator to lead an army outside Italy, when he invaded Sicily, and he was the only dictator to hold a military command during the First Punic War.[42] The last dictators to lead an army in the field were Quintus Fabius Maximus Verrucosus in 217, and Marcus Junius Pera the following year, during the early stages of the Second Punic War.[43] All of the other dictators appointed during that conflict remained at Rome in order to hold the comitia;[xviii] the last dictator named in the traditional manner was Gaius Servilius Geminus, in 202 BC.[46][47][xix] Dictatorship revived[edit] Bust presumed to be that of Roman Dictator Lucius Cornelius Sulla For the next century, Rome's ordinary magistrates and promagistrates successfully carried on all Roman campaigns, without the need for a dictator, and the office fell into abeyance. Then, in 82 BC, the dictatorship was suddenly revived by Sulla. Sulla, already a successful general, had previously marched on Rome and taken the city from his political opponents six years earlier; but after he permitted the election of magistrates for 87, and departed to campaign in the east, his enemies returned. In 83 he turned his attention to regaining Rome, and after defeating his opponents decisively the next year, the Senate and the people named him dictator legibus faciendis et rei publicae constituendae, giving Sulla the power to rewrite the Roman constitution, without any time limit.[49][xx] Sulla's reforms of the constitution doubled the size of the Senate from 300 to 600, filling its ranks with his supporters. He then placed severe limits on the tribunician power, limiting the veto and forbidding ex-tribunes from holding higher magistracies. Although he resigned the dictatorship in 81, and held the consulship in 80, before returning to private life, Sulla's actions had weakened the Roman state and set a precedent for the concentration of power without effective limitation.[49] The dictatorial power was then granted to Caesar in 49 BC, when he returned to Rome from his campaigns in Gaul, and put the forces of Pompeius ("Pompey the Great") to flight. He resigned the dictatorship after only eleven days, having held the comitia at which he himself was elected consul for the following year. Late in 48, Caesar was named dictator rei gerundae causa with a term of one year, and granted the tribunician power for an indefinite period. He saw to the impeachment of two tribunes who had tried to obstruct him, and having been granted censorial powers, he filled the depleted numbers of the Senate with his supporters, raising the number of senators to 900. In 47, he was named dictator for a term of ten years. Shortly before his assassination in BC 44, Caesar was named dictator perpetuo rei publicae constituendae, and given the power to appoint magistrates at will.[50][51][52] Abolition[edit] Caesar's murder came at the hands of conspirators who presented themselves as saviours of the Republic. In order to maintain popular support, Caesar's followers took great care to show their own commitment to preserving the Roman state. The month after the assassination, Mark Antony, who had been Caesar's magister equitum in BC 47, proposed a series of laws, confirming Caesar's actions, but allowing appeals and formally abolishing the dictatorship. These were passed, as the leges Antoniae.[53] In 23 BC, when Caesar's nephew and heir Augustus had attained full control of the state, the Senate offered to appoint him dictator, but he declined, while at the same time accepting proconsular imperium and the tribunician power for life. Thus, Augustus preserved the appearance of respecting Republican forms, even as he arrogated most of the powers of the Roman state.[54] Following his example, none of the emperors who succeeded him ever adopted the title of dictator. When Constantine chose to revive the ancient concept of the infantry commander, he pointedly gave the office the name of magister peditum, "master of the foot", rather than magister populi, the official style of a dictator.[55] List of Roman dictators[edit] Main article: List of Roman dictators See also[edit] Constitution of the Roman Republic – The norms, customs, and written laws, which guided the government of the Roman Republic Constitutional dictatorship Dictator – Political leader who possesses absolute power Footnotes[edit] ^ The exact date is uncertain, as are many of the details of this event, but 501 BC is the date generally favoured by historians.[6] ^ An alternative tradition mentioned by Livy is that the first dictator was Manius Valerius Maximus, although Livy thought this improbable, as dictators were supposed to be consulares, that is, men who had already served as consul; and had a Valerius been desired, Manius' brother, Marcus (described by Livy as either the uncle or father of Manius), consul in 505 BC, would have been chosen instead.[7] Modern historians generally share Livy's view, notwithstanding the fact that Manius Valerius was appointed dictator in BC 494, without having first held the consulship.[8] ^ Lintott considers the evidence for praetor maximus as the original name of the magistracy inconclusive, as it depends on the interpretation of an ancient law calling for an official of this title to drive a nail into the wall of the Temple of Jupiter Optimus Maximus; the law seems to have dated from the period of the monarchy, and under the Republic was interpreted to mean that this duty should be undertaken by a dictator, as the highest-ranking magistrate; but the first to perform it after the expulsion of the Tarquins was a consul, Marcus Horatius Pulvillus. Nevertheless, the law seems to confirm the existence of such a magistracy in the time of the kings, which might be considered the forerunner of the later magister populi.[9][10] ^ Literally, of the equites, sometimes translated as "knights". ^ A notable exception occurred in BC 431, when the consuls Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus and Gaius Julius Mento were directed to nominate a dictator, probably after having been defeated in an attempt to dislodge the Aequi and Volsci from their fortifications on Mount Algidus. The consuls, who still felt themselves able to hold the military command, refused, until the tribunes of the plebs threatened to have them imprisoned if they did not nominate a dictator.[12] ^ As this was an annual ritual, it must generally have been observed by the consuls; but Livy mentions an ancient law calling for it to be performed by the praetor maximus, apparently a magistrate in the time of the kings; and on at least one occasion when there was a dictator, it was interpreted to mean that the rite must be performed by the dictator, as the magistrate then holding the greatest imperium.[10] ^ In 344 BC, "a shower of stones rained down and darkness spread over the sky in the daytime."[14] This appeared to be a repetition of an omen that occurred during the reign of Tullus Hostilius, the third King of Rome, when a shower of stones fell on the Alban Mount after the war in which Hostilius had destroyed the ancient Latin city of Alba Longa, and transferred its people to Rome. In a response, a nine-day religious festival was decreed, with the intention that it be repeated should such an omen occur again.[15] ^ The major exception was the ill-starred Marcus Claudius Glicia, freedman of Publius Claudius Pulcher, who nominated him dictator in a fit of pique, when the Senate deprived him of his command after he had ignored ill omens and been defeated in the Battle of Drepana. The Senate compelled Glicia to abdicate the office, even before he could name a magister equitum.[20][21] ^ The chief exception occurred in 216 BC, when Marcus Fabius Buteo was nominated dictator in order to fill up the ranks of the Senate following the Battle of Cannae, even as the dictator Marcus Junius Pera held the military command against Hannibal.[17] ^ Lintott suggests only twelve fasces were displayed when the dictator was within the city.[24] ^ For instance, Lucius Manlius Capitolinus was appointed clavi figendi causa, but wished to lead an army against the Hernici. He proceeded to levy troops, but was compelled to resign before he could take the field, and was prosecuted the following year.[28] ^ However, the Senate might request a dictator for a reason other than the one publicly announced; for example Gaius Julius Iulus was ostensibly nominated in BC 352 in order to carry on a war against the Etruscans, but in fact there was no threat from the Etruscans; he was appointed in order to procure the election of two patrician consuls, in violation of the lex Licinia Sextia.[29] ^ In this instance, the parties were deadlocked, and agreed to submit the matter to the Senate for resolution. The Senate decided that it would be better to allow Fulvius to stand for election, given his vast experience (before his dictatorship, he had been consul three times, praetor, censor, and magister equitum).[37] ^ The precise nature of the charges differs according to source; Broughton lists four reasons given by ancient authorities: "1. remaining Dictator when his religious duty was done; 2. remaining in office beyond his legal term; 3. raising a levy with too great severity; 4. mistreatment of his son, the future T. Manlius Torquatus..."[39] ^ The future Titus Manlius Torquatus would himself become dictator three times; in BC 353, 349, and 320, and consul twice, in 344 and 340. This was the Manlius who won his surname from having defeated a giant Gaul in single combat, and taking his torque. Despite his ill-treatment at the hands of his father, so powerful was his respect for paternal discipline, that when his eldest son disobeyed orders by engaging in single combat with the leader of the Latin cavalry (whom he defeated and slew), the consul commanded that his victorious son be scourged and beheaded. ^ In 325 BC, the dictator Lucius Papirius Cursor was so furious when the magister equitum engaged the enemy in battle against his express orders, that he intended to have young Quintus Fabius Maximus Rullianus scourged and perhaps beheaded, notwithstanding the fact that Fabius had won a famous victory; he was restrained only when Fabius escaped and made his way to Rome, where the entire Roman people interceded on his behalf and begged the dictator to show mercy. A century later, when Fabius' grandson, Quintus Fabius Maximus Verrucosus was dictator, his magister equitum, Marcus Minucius Rufus, defied him openly, and likewise fled to Rome in fear for his life, where he convinced the Senate to grant him imperium equal to that of the dictator's. But in this case, it was the dictator who came to the rescue of his rebellious magister equitum, when Minucius improvidently offered battle and came near to destruction.[27] ^ For example, in BC 352, the dictator Gaius Julius Iulus was nominated, ostensibly to fight a war against the Etruscans, although there was no actual threat from Etruria; however he failed to prevent the election of a plebeian consul. Two years later, the dictator Lucius Furius Camillus succeeded in procuring the election of two patricians.[41] ^ Titus Manlius Torquatus also held the Roman games in 208 BC.[44][45] ^ Despite the impending end of the war, there was a series of unwelcome prodigies in Italy; in Cumae the skies darkened at mid-day, and a shower of stones fell there and on the Palatine Hill at Rome. A similar omen in the time of Tullus Hostilius, the third King of Rome, had led to a nine-day religious festival, and in 344 BC, Publius Valerius Poplicola had been nominated dictator in response to a second occurrence; he also organized a religious festival. For the third occurrence in 202, a nine-day religious festival was held before the dictator Servilius was nominated, since his chief purpose was to hold the comitia.[48] ^ The legislation was introduced by Lucius Valerius Flaccus, who had been appointed interrex at Sulla's request, as both consuls were dead. In turn, Sulla named Flaccus his magister equitum.[49] References[edit] ^ a b c d e f g Harper's Dictionary of Classical Antiquities, p. 509. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o Oxford Classical Dictionary, p. 339 ("Dictator"). ^ Lintott, pp. 109–113. ^ Oxford Classical Dictionary, p. 286 ("Consul"). ^ Oxford Classical Dictionary, pp. 429 ("Fasces"), 609 ("Lictores"), 639 ("Magistracy, Roman"), 1080 ("Toga"). ^ Broughton, vol. I, p. 9. ^ a b c Livy, ii. 18. ^ Broughton, vol. I, pp. 9, 14. ^ Lintott, p. 104 (note 47). ^ a b Livy, vii. 3. ^ a b c d e f g Lintott, p. 110. ^ Livy, iv. 26. ^ Livy, iv. 27. ^ Livy, vii. 28, Betty Radice, trans. ^ Livy, i. 31. ^ Livy, ix. 27. ^ a b c Livy, xxiii. 23. ^ Broughton, vol. I, pp. 112, 132, 150, 152, 248. ^ Broughton, vol. I, p. 112. ^ Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology, vol. II, p. 276. ^ Broughton, vol. I, p. 215. ^ Livy, viii. 15, 17, 23. ^ Broughton, vol. I, pp. 139, 140, 145. ^ a b c d e f g Lintott, p. 111. ^ Livy, xxiii. 14. ^ Plutarch, "Life of Fabius Maximus", 4. ^ a b c d e Lintott, p. 112. ^ Livy, vii. 3–5. ^ Broughton, vol. I, p. 125. ^ Livy, xxxiii. 14. ^ Broughton, vol. I, p. 248. ^ Mommsen, Römisches Staatsrecht, ii. 133–172. ^ a b Broughton, vol. I, pp. 140, 141, 147–149, 162, 163, 169–171. ^ Livy, ii. 18, iii. 20. ^ Dionysius, vi. 58. ^ Livy, viii. 29–35. ^ a b Livy, xxvii. 6. ^ Plutarch, "Life of Fabius Maximus", 9. ^ Broughton, vol. I, p. 118. ^ Livy, vii. 4, 5. ^ a b Broughton, vol. I, pp. 125, 128. ^ Broughton, vol. I, p. 215. ^ Broughton, vol. I, pp. 243, 248. ^ Livy, xxvii. 34. ^ Broughton, vol. I, p. 290. ^ Livy, xxx. 39. ^ Broughton, vol. I, p. 316. ^ Livy, xxx. 38. ^ a b c Oxford Classical Dictionary, p. 1022 ("Sulla"). ^ Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology, vol. I, pp. 139–155 ("Caesar", no. 18). ^ Oxford Classical Dictionary, pp. 189, 190 ("Caesar"). ^ Lintott, p. 113. ^ Oxford Classical Dictionary, p. 601 ("Lex"). ^ Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology, vol. I, p. 428 ("Augustus"). ^ Oxford Classical Dictionary, p. 638 ("Magister Militum"). Bibliography[edit] Titus Livius (Livy), Ab Urbe Condita (History of Rome). Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Romaike Archaiologia. Plutarchus, Lives of the Noble Greeks and Romans. Christian Matthias Theodor Mommsen, Römisches Staatsrecht, S. Hirzel, Leipzig (1876). Harper's Dictionary of Classical Literature and Antiquities, Second Edition, Harry Thurston Peck, ed., Harper & Brothers Publishers, New York (1898). T. Robert S. Broughton, The Magistrates of the Roman Republic, American Philological Association (1952). Oxford Classical Dictionary, N. G. L. Hammond and H. H. Scullard, eds., Clarendon Press, Oxford (Second Edition, 1970). Andrew Lintott, The Constitution of the Roman Republic, Oxford University Press (1999), pp. 109 ff. v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Roman_dictator&oldid=996790485" Categories: Roman Republic Ancient Roman titles Ancient Roman dictators Emergency laws Cursus honorum Hidden categories: Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Languages Afrikaans العربية Azərbaycanca Български Català Čeština Deutsch Eesti Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français 한국어 Bahasa Indonesia Italiano עברית ქართული Magyar Македонски Bahasa Melayu Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Occitan Português Română Русский Simple English Slovenčina Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska ไทย Türkçe Українська Zazaki 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 28 December 2020, at 16:58 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2654 ---- Western Roman Empire - Wikipedia Western Roman Empire From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Independently administered western provinces of the Roman Empire "Western Empire" redirects here. For the Frankish State, see Carolingian Empire. Western Roman Empire Senatus Populusque Romanus Imperium Romanuma 395–476/480b Chi Rho Tremissis depicting Julius Nepos (r. 474–480) The Western Roman Empire in 418 AD, following the abandonment of Britannia and the settlement of the Visigoths, Burgundians and Suebi within imperial territory as foederati Status Western division of the Roman Empire a Capital Mediolanum (286–402)[1] Ravenna (402–455, 473–476) Romec (455–473) Salona/Spalatumd (475–480) Common languages Latin (official) Regional / local languages Religion Polytheistic Roman Religion until 4th century Nicene Christianity (state church) after 380 Government Autocracy Roman Emperor   • 395–423 Honorius • 457–461 Majorian • 474–480 Julius Nepos • 475–476 Romulus Augustulus Legislature Roman Senate Historical era Late antiquity • Death of Emperor Theodosius I 17 January 395 • Deposition of Emperor Romulus Augustulus 4 September 476 • Murder of Emperor Julius Nepos 25 April 480 Area 395[2] 2,000,000 km2 (770,000 sq mi) Currency Roman currency Preceded by Succeeded by Roman Empire Eastern Roman Empire Kingdom of Italy Kingdom of the Visigoths Kingdom of the Vandals Kingdom of the Franks Kingdom of the Suebi Kingdom of the Burgundians Kingdom of the Romans Kingdom of the Moors and Romans Alamannia Armorica Sub-Roman Britain ^ Since the Western Roman Empire was not a distinct state separate from the Eastern Roman Empire, there was no particular official term that designated the Western provinces or their government, which was simply known at the time as the "Roman Empire". Terms such as Imperium Romanum Occidentale and Hesperium Imperium were either never in official usage or invented by later medieval or modern historians long after the Western Roman court had fallen. In the ancient era the Latin term often used was "S.P.Q.R." ("Senatus Populusque Romanus" ["Senate and People of Rome"] Latin) used in documents, on flags and banners and carved/engraved on buildings ^ Whilst the deposition of Emperor Romulus Augustulus in 476 is the most commonly cited end date for the Western Roman Empire, the last Western Roman Emperor Julius Nepos, was assassinated in 480, when the title and notion of a separate Western Empire were abolished. Another suggested end date is the reorganization of the Italian peninsula and abolition of separate Western Roman administrative institutions under Emperor Justinian during the latter half of the 6th century. ^ The Theodosian dynasty emperors Honorius and Valentinian III reigned from Ravenna. In the period between Valentinian and Glycerius (who once again reigned from northern Italy), most emperors appear to have reigned from Rome. Both emperors Petronius Maximus and Anthemius reigned from, and died in, Rome. ^ The de jure last emperor, Julius Nepos, reigned for five years in exile from Salona/Spalatum in Dalmatia.[3][4][5] The Western Roman Empire comprises the western provinces of the Roman Empire at any time during which they were administered by a separate independent Imperial court; in particular, this term is used in historiography to describe the period from 395 to 476, where there were separate coequal courts dividing the governance of the empire in the Western and the Eastern provinces, with a distinct imperial succession in the separate courts. The terms Western Roman Empire and Eastern Roman Empire were coined in modern times to describe political entities that were de facto independent; contemporary Romans did not consider the Empire to have been split into two separate empires but viewed it as a single polity governed by two separate imperial courts as an administrative expediency. The Western Roman Empire collapsed in 476, and the Western imperial court in Ravenna was formally dissolved by Justinian in 554. The Eastern imperial court survived until 1453. Though the Empire had seen periods with more than one Emperor ruling jointly before, the view that it was impossible for a single emperor to govern the entire Empire was institutionalised to reforms to Roman law by emperor Diocletian following the disastrous civil wars and disintegrations of the Crisis of the Third Century. He introduced the system of the tetrarchy in 286, with two separate senior emperors titled Augustus, one in the East and one in the West, each with an appointed Caesar (junior emperor and designated successor). Though the tetrarchic system would collapse in a matter of years, the East–West administrative division would endure in one form or another over the coming centuries. As such, the Western Roman Empire would exist intermittently in several periods between the 3rd and 5th centuries. Some emperors, such as Constantine I and Theodosius I, governed as the sole Augustus across the Roman Empire. On the death of Theodosius I in 395, he divided the empire between his two sons, with Honorius as his successor in the West, governing briefly from Mediolanum and then from Ravenna, and Arcadius as his successor in the East, governing from Constantinople. In 476, after the Battle of Ravenna, the Roman Army in the West suffered defeat at the hands of Odoacer and his Germanic foederati. Odoacer forced the deposition of emperor Romulus Augustulus and became the first King of Italy. In 480, following the assassination of the previous Western emperor Julius Nepos, the Eastern emperor Zeno dissolved the Western court and proclaimed himself the sole emperor of the Roman Empire. The date of 476 was popularized by the 18th century British historian Edward Gibbon as a demarcating event for the end of the Western Empire and is sometimes used to mark the transition from Antiquity to the Middle Ages. Odoacer's Italy, and other barbarian kingdoms, many of them representing former Western Roman allies that had been granted lands in return for military assistance, would maintain a pretence of Roman continuity through the continued use of the old Roman administrative systems and nominal subservience to the Eastern Roman court. In the 6th century, emperor Justinian I re-imposed direct Imperial rule on large parts of the former Western Roman Empire, including the prosperous regions of North Africa, the ancient Roman heartland of Italy and parts of Hispania. Political instability in the Eastern heartlands, combined with foreign invasions and religious differences, made efforts to retain control of these territories difficult and they were gradually lost for good. Though the Eastern Empire retained territories in the south of Italy until the eleventh century, the influence that the Empire had over Western Europe had diminished significantly. The papal coronation of the Frankish King Charlemagne as Roman Emperor in 800 marked a new imperial line that would evolve into the Holy Roman Empire, which presented a revival of the Imperial title in Western Europe but was in no meaningful sense an extension of Roman traditions or institutions. The Great Schism of 1054 between the churches of Rome and Constantinople further diminished any authority the Emperor in Constantinople could hope to exert in the west. Contents 1 Background 1.1 Rebellions and political developments 1.2 Crisis of the Third Century 1.3 Tetrarchy 1.4 Further divisions 2 History 2.1 Reign of Honorius 2.2 Escalating barbarian conflicts 2.3 Internal unrest and Majorian 2.4 Collapse 2.5 Fall of the Empire 3 Political aftermath 3.1 Germanic Italy 3.2 Imperial reconquest 4 Legacy 4.1 Nomenclature 4.2 Attempted restorations of a Western court 4.3 Later claims to the Imperial title in the West 5 List of Western Roman Emperors 5.1 Tetrarchy (286–313) 5.2 Constantinian dynasty (309–363) 5.3 Non-dynastic (363–364) 5.4 Valentinianic dynasty (364–392) 5.5 Theodosian dynasty (392–455) 5.6 Non-dynastic (455–480) 6 References 6.1 Citations 6.2 Sources 6.3 Web sources 7 Further reading 8 External links Background[edit] Further information: History of the Roman Empire and First division of the Roman Empire As the Roman Republic expanded, it reached a point where the central government in Rome could not effectively rule the distant provinces. Communications and transportation were especially problematic given the vast extent of the Empire. News of invasion, revolt, natural disasters, or epidemic outbreak was carried by ship or mounted postal service, often requiring much time to reach Rome and for Rome's orders to be returned and acted upon. Therefore, provincial governors had de facto autonomy in the name of the Roman Republic. Governors had several duties, including the command of armies, handling the taxes of the province and serving as the province's chief judges.[6] Prior to the establishment of the Empire, the territories of the Roman Republic had been divided in 43 BC among the members of the Second Triumvirate: Mark Antony, Octavian and Marcus Aemilius Lepidus. Antony received the provinces in the East: Achaea, Macedonia and Epirus (roughly modern Greece, Albania and the coast of Croatia), Bithynia, Pontus and Asia (roughly modern Turkey), Syria, Cyprus, and Cyrenaica.[7] These lands had previously been conquered by Alexander the Great; thus, much of the aristocracy was of Greek origin. The whole region, especially the major cities, had been largely assimilated into Greek culture, Greek often serving as the lingua franca.[8] The Roman Republic before the conquests of Octavian Octavian obtained the Roman provinces of the West: Italia (modern Italy), Gaul (modern France), Gallia Belgica (parts of modern Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxembourg), and Hispania (modern Spain and Portugal).[7] These lands also included Greek and Carthaginian colonies in the coastal areas, though Celtic tribes such as Gauls and Celtiberians were culturally dominant. Lepidus received the minor province of Africa (roughly modern Tunisia). Octavian soon took Africa from Lepidus, while adding Sicilia (modern Sicily) to his holdings.[9] Upon the defeat of Mark Antony, a victorious Octavian controlled a united Roman Empire. The Empire featured many distinct cultures, all experienced a gradual Romanization.[10] While the predominantly Greek culture of the East and the predominantly Latin culture of the West functioned effectively as an integrated whole, political and military developments would ultimately realign the Empire along those cultural and linguistic lines. More often than not, Greek and Latin practices (and to some extent the languages themselves) would be combined in fields such as history (e.g., those by Cato the Elder), philosophy and rhetoric.[11][12][13] Rebellions and political developments[edit] Minor rebellions and uprisings were fairly common events throughout the Empire. Conquered tribes or oppressed cities would revolt, and the legions would be detached to crush the rebellion. While this process was simple in peacetime, it could be considerably more complicated in wartime. In a full-blown military campaign, the legions were far more numerous—as, for example, those led by Vespasian in the First Jewish–Roman War. To ensure a commander's loyalty, a pragmatic emperor might hold some members of the general's family hostage. To this end, Nero effectively held Domitian and Quintus Petillius Cerialis, Governor of Ostia, who were respectively the younger son and brother-in-law of Vespasian. Nero's rule was ended by a revolt of the Praetorian Guard, who had been bribed in the name of Galba. The Praetorian Guard, a figurative "sword of Damocles", was often perceived as being of dubious loyalty, primarily due its role in court intrigues and in overthrowing several emperors, including Pertinax and Aurelian.[14][15] Following their example, the legions at the borders increasingly participated in civil wars. For instance, legions stationed in Egypt and the eastern provinces would see significant participation in the civil war of 218 between Emperor Macrinus and Elagabalus.[16] As the Empire expanded, two key frontiers revealed themselves. In the West, behind the rivers Rhine and Danube, Germanic tribes were an important enemy. Augustus, the first emperor, had tried to conquer them but had pulled back after the disastrous Battle of the Teutoburg Forest.[17] Whilst the Germanic tribes were formidable foes, the Parthian Empire in the East presented the greatest threat to the Empire. The Parthians were too remote and powerful to be conquered and there was a constant Parthian threat of invasion. The Parthians repelled several Roman invasions, and even after successful wars of conquest, such as those implemented by Trajan or Septimius Severus, the conquered territories were forsaken in attempts to ensure a lasting peace with the Parthians. The Parthian Empire would be succeeded by the Sasanian Empire, which continued hostilities with the Roman Empire.[18] Controlling the western border of Rome was reasonably easy because it was relatively close to Rome itself and also because of the disunity among the Germans. However, controlling both frontiers simultaneously during wartime was difficult. If the emperor was near the border in the East, the chances were high that an ambitious general would rebel in the West and vice versa. This wartime opportunism plagued many ruling emperors and indeed paved the road to power for several future emperors. By the time of the Crisis of the Third Century, usurpation became a common method of succession: Philip the Arab, Trebonianus Gallus and Aemilianus were all usurping generals-turned-emperors whose rule would end with usurpation by another powerful general.[19][20][21] Crisis of the Third Century[edit] Main article: Crisis of the Third Century The Roman, Gallic and Palmyrene Empires in 271 AD With the assassination of the Emperor Alexander Severus on 18 March 235, the Roman Empire sank into a 50-year period of civil war, now known as the Crisis of the Third Century. The rise of the bellicose Sasanian Empire in place of Parthia posed a major threat to Rome in the east, as demonstrated by Shapur I's capture of Emperor Valerian in 259. Valerian's eldest son and heir-apparent, Gallienus, succeeded him and took up the fight on the eastern frontier. Gallienus' son, Saloninus, and the Praetorian Prefect Silvanus were residing in Colonia Agrippina (modern Cologne) to solidify the loyalty of the local legions. Nevertheless, Marcus Cassianius Latinius Postumus – the local governor of the German provinces – rebelled; his assault on Colonia Agrippina resulted in the deaths of Saloninus and the prefect. In the confusion that followed, an independent state known in modern historiography as the Gallic Empire emerged.[22] Its capital was Augusta Treverorum (modern Trier), and it quickly expanded its control over the German and Gaulish provinces, all of Hispania and Britannia. It had its own senate, and a partial list of its consuls still survives. It maintained Roman religion, language, and culture, and was far more concerned with fighting the Germanic tribes, fending off Germanic incursions and restoring the security the Gallic provinces had enjoyed in the past, than in challenging the Roman central government.[23] However, in the reign of Claudius Gothicus (268 to 270), large expanses of the Gallic Empire were restored to Roman rule. At roughly the same time, several eastern provinces seceded to form the Palmyrene Empire, under the rule of Queen Zenobia.[24] In 272, Emperor Aurelian finally managed to reclaim Palmyra and its territory for the empire. With the East secure, his attention turned to the West, invading the Gallic Empire a year later. Aurelian decisively defeated Tetricus I in the Battle of Châlons, and soon captured Tetricus and his son Tetricus II. Both Zenobia and the Tetrici were pardoned, although they were first paraded in a triumph.[25][26] Tetrarchy[edit] Main article: Tetrarchy The organization of the Empire under the Tetrarchy Diocletian was the first Emperor to divide the Roman Empire into a Tetrarchy. In 286 he elevated Maximian to the rank of augustus (emperor) and gave him control of the Western Empire while he himself ruled the East.[27][28][29] In 293, Galerius and Constantius Chlorus were appointed as their subordinates (caesars), creating the First Tetrarchy. This system effectively divided the Empire into four major regions, as a way to avoid the civil unrest that had marked the 3rd century. In the West, Maximian made Mediolanum (now Milan) his capital, and Constantius made Trier his. In the East, Galerius made his capital Sirmium and Diocletian made Nicomedia his. On 1 May 305, Diocletian and Maximian abdicated, replaced by Galerius and Constantius, who appointed Maximinus II and Valerius Severus, respectively, as their caesars, creating the Second Tetrarchy.[30] The Tetrarchy collapsed after the unexpected death of Constantius in 306. His son, Constantine the Great, was declared Western Emperor by the British legions,[31][32][33][34] but several other claimants arose and attempted to seize the Western Empire. In 308, Galerius held a meeting at Carnuntum, where he revived the Tetrarchy by dividing the Western Empire between Constantine and Licinius.[35] However, Constantine was more interested in conquering the whole empire than he was in the stability of the Tetrarchy, and by 314 began to compete against Licinius. Constantine defeated Licinius in 324, at the Battle of Chrysopolis, where Licinius was taken prisoner, and later murdered.[36] After Constantine unified the empire, he refounded the city of Byzantium in modern-day Turkey as Nova Roma ("New Rome"), later called Constantinople, and made it the capital of the Roman Empire.[37] The Tetrarchy was ended, although the concept of physically splitting the Roman Empire between two emperors remained. Although several powerful emperors unified both parts of the empire, this generally reverted in an empire divided into East and West upon their deaths, such as happened after the deaths of Constantine and Theodosius I.[38][39] Further divisions[edit] Division of the Roman Empire among the Caesars appointed by Constantine I: from west to east, the territories of Constantine II, Constans I, Dalmatius and Constantius II. After the death of Constantine I (May 337), this was the formal division of the Empire, until Dalmatius was killed and his territory divided between Constans and Constantius. The Roman Empire was under the rule of a single Emperor, but, with the death of Constantine in 337, the empire was partitioned between his surviving male heirs.[38] Constantius, his third son and the second by his wife Fausta (Maximian's daughter)[40] received the eastern provinces, including Constantinople, Thrace, Asia Minor, Syria, Egypt, and Cyrenaica; Constantine II received Britannia, Gaul, Hispania, and Mauretania; and Constans, initially under the supervision of Constantine II, received Italy, Africa, Illyricum, Pannonia, Macedonia, and Achaea. The provinces of Thrace, Achaea and Macedonia were shortly controlled by Dalmatius, nephew of Constantine I and a caesar, not an Augustus, until his murder by his own soldiers in 337.[41] The West was unified in 340 under Constans, who was assassinated in 350 under the order of the usurper Magnentius. After Magnentius lost the Battle of Mursa Major and committed suicide, a complete reunification of the whole Empire occurred under Constantius in 353.[40] Constantius II focused most of his power in the East. Under his rule, the city of Byzantium – only recently re-founded as Constantinople – was fully developed as a capital. At Constantinople, the political, economic and military control of the Eastern Empire's resources would remain safe for centuries to come. The city was well fortified and located at the crossroads of several major trade and military routes. The site had been acknowledged for its strategic importance already by emperors Septimius Severus and Caracalla, more than a century prior.[42] In 361, Constantius II became ill and died, and Constantius Chlorus' grandson Julian, who had served as Constantius II's Caesar, assumed power. Julian was killed in 363 in the Battle of Samarra against the Persian Empire and was succeeded by Jovian, who ruled for only nine months.[43] Following the death of Jovian, Valentinian I emerged as Emperor in 364. He immediately divided the Empire once again, giving the eastern half to his brother Valens. Stability was not achieved for long in either half, as the conflicts with outside forces (barbarian tribes) intensified. In 376, the Visigoths, fleeing before the Ostrogoths, who in turn were fleeing before the Huns, were allowed to cross the river Danube and settle in the Balkans by the Eastern government. Mistreatment caused a full-scale rebellion, and in 378 they inflicted a crippling defeat on the Eastern Roman field army in the Battle of Adrianople, in which Emperor Valens also died. The defeat at Adrianople was shocking to the Romans, and forced them to negotiate with and settle the Visigoths within the borders of the Empire, where they would become semi-independent foederati under their own leaders.[44] The division of the Empire after the death of Theodosius I, c. 395 AD, superimposed on modern borders  Western Court under Honorius   Eastern Court under Arcadius More than in the East, there was also opposition to the Christianizing policy of the Emperors in the western part of the Empire. In 379, Valentinian I's son and successor Gratian declined to wear the mantle of Pontifex Maximus, and in 382 he rescinded the rights of pagan priests and removed the Altar of Victory from the Roman Curia, a decision which caused dissatisfaction among the traditionally pagan aristocracy of Rome.[45] Theodosius I later decreed the Edict of Thessalonica, which banned all religions except Christianity.[46] The political situation was unstable. In 383, a powerful and popular general named Magnus Maximus seized power in the West and forced Gratian's half-brother Valentinian II to flee to the East for aid; in a destructive civil war the Eastern Emperor Theodosius I restored him to power.[47] In 392, the Frankish and pagan magister militum Arbogast assassinated Valentinian II and proclaimed an obscure senator named Eugenius as Emperor. In 394 the forces of the two halves of the Empire again clashed with great loss of life. Again Theodosius I won, and he briefly ruled a united Empire until his death in 395. He was the last Emperor to rule both parts of the Roman Empire before the West fragmented and collapsed.[39] Theodosius I's older son Arcadius inherited the eastern half while the younger Honorius got the western half. Both were still minors and neither was capable of ruling effectively. Honorius was placed under the tutelage of the half-Roman/half-barbarian magister militum Flavius Stilicho,[48] while Rufinus became the power behind the throne in the east. Rufinus and Stilicho were rivals, and their disagreements would be exploited by the Gothic leader Alaric I who again rebelled in 408 following the massacre by Roman legions of thousands of barbarian families who were trying to assimilate into the Roman empire.[49] Neither half of the Empire could raise forces sufficient even to subdue Alaric's men, and both tried to use Alaric against the other half. Alaric himself tried to establish a long-term territorial and official base, but was never able to do so. Stilicho tried to defend Italy and bring the invading Goths under control, but to do so he stripped the Rhine frontier of troops and the Vandals, Alans, and Suevi invaded Gaul in large numbers in 406. Stilicho became a victim of court intrigues and was killed in 408. While the East began a slow recovery and consolidation, the West began to collapse entirely. Alaric's men sacked Rome in 410.[50] History[edit] Reign of Honorius[edit] Main article: Honorius (emperor) Solidus of Emperor Honorius Honorius, the younger son of Theodosius I, was declared Augustus (and as such co-emperor with his father) on 23 January in 393. Upon the death of Theodosius, Honorius inherited the throne of the West at the age of ten whilst his older brother Arcadius inherited the East. The western capital was initially Mediolanum, as it had been during previous divisions, but it was moved to Ravenna in 402 upon the entry of the Visigothic king Alaric I into Italy. Ravenna, protected by abundant marshes and strong fortifications, was far easier to defend and had easy access to the imperial fleet of the Eastern Empire but made it more difficult for the Roman military to defend the central parts of Italy from regular barbarian incursions.[51] Ravenna would remain the western capital 74 years until the deposition of Romulus Augustulus and would later be the capital of both the Ostrogothic Kingdom and the Exarchate of Ravenna.[52][53] Despite the moved capital, economic power remained focused on Rome and its rich senatorial aristocracy which dominated much of Italy and Africa in particular. After Emperor Gallienus had banned senators from army commands in the mid-3rd century, the senatorial elite lost all experience of—and interest in—military life.[54] In the early 5th century the wealthy landowning elite of the Roman Senate largely barred its tenants from military service, but it also refused to approve sufficient funding for maintaining a sufficiently powerful mercenary army to defend the entire Western Empire. The West's most important military area had been northern Gaul and the Rhine frontier in the 4th century, when Trier frequently served as a military capital of sorts for the Empire. Many leading Western generals were barbarians.[55] The reign of Honorius was, even by Western Roman standards, chaotic and plagued by both internal and external struggles. The Visigothic foederati under Alaric, magister militum in Illyricum, rebelled in 395. Gildo, the Comes Africae and Magister utriusque militiae per Africam, rebelled in 397 and initiated the Gildonic War. Stilicho managed to subdue Gildo but was campaigning in Raetia when the Visigoths entered Italy in 402.[56] Stilicho, hurrying back to aid in defending Italy, summoned legions in Gaul and Britain with which he managed to defeat Alaric twice before agreeing to allow him to retreat back to Illyria.[57] Barbarian invasions and the invasion of usurper Constantine III in the Western Roman Empire during the reign of Honorius 407–409 The weakening of the frontiers in Britain and Gaul had dire consequences for the Empire. As the imperial government was not providing the military protection the northern provinces expected and needed, numerous usurpers arose in Britain, including Marcus (406–407), Gratian (407), and Constantine III who invaded Gaul in 407.[58] Britain was effectively abandoned by the empire by 410 due to the lack of resources and the need to look after more important frontiers. The weakening of the Rhine frontier allowed multiple barbarian tribes, including the Vandals, Alans and Suebi, to cross the river and enter Roman territory in 406.[59] Honorius was convinced by the minister Olympius that Stilicho was conspiring to overthrow him, and so arrested and executed Stilicho in 408.[60] Olympius headed a conspiracy that successfully orchestrated the deaths of key individuals related to the faction of Stilicho, including his son and the families of many of his federated troops. This led many of the soldiers to instead join with Alaric, who returned to Italy in 409 and met little opposition. Despite attempts by Honorius to reach a settlement and six legions of Eastern Roman soldiers sent to support him,[61] the negotiations between Alaric and Honorius broke down in 410 and Alaric sacked the city of Rome. Though the sack was relatively mild and Rome was no longer the capital of even the Western Empire, the event shocked people across both halves of the Empire as this was the first time Rome (viewed at least as the symbolic heart of the Empire) had fallen to a foreign enemy since the Gallic invasions of the 4th century BC. The Eastern Roman Emperor Theodosius II, the successor of Arcadius, declared three days of mourning in Constantinople.[62] Without Stilicho and following the sack of Rome, Honorius' reign grew more chaotic. The usurper Constantine III had stripped Roman Britain of its defenses when he crossed over to Gaul in 407, leaving the Romanized population subject to invasions, first by the Picts and then by the Saxons, Angli, and the Jutes who began to settle permanently from about 440 onwards. After Honorius accepted Constantine as co-emperor, Constantine's general in Hispania, Gerontius, proclaimed Maximus as Emperor. With the aid of general Constantius, Honorius successfully defeated Gerontius and Maximus in 411 and shortly thereafter captured and executed Constantine III. With Constantius back in Italy, the Gallo-Roman senator Jovinus revolted after proclaiming himself Emperor, with the support of the Gallic nobility and the barbarian Burgundians and Alans. Honorius turned to the Visigoths under King Athaulf for support.[63] Athaulf defeated and executed Jovinus and his proclaimed co-emperor Sebastianus in 413, around the same time as another usurper arose in Africa, Heraclianus. Heraclianus attempted to invade Italy but failed and retreated to Carthage, where he was killed.[64] With the Roman legions withdrawn, northern Gaul became increasingly subject to Frankish influence, the Franks naturally adopting a leading role in the region. In 418, Honorius granted southwestern Gaul (Gallia Aquitania) to the Visigoths as a vassal federation. Honorius removed the local imperial governors, leaving the Visigoths and the provincial Roman inhabitants to conduct their own affairs. As such, the first of the "barbarian kingdoms", the Visigothic Kingdom, was formed.[65] Escalating barbarian conflicts[edit] Germanic and Hunnic invasions of the Roman Empire, 100–500 AD Honorius' death in 423 was followed by turmoil until the Eastern Roman government installed Valentinian III as Western Emperor in Ravenna by force of arms, with Galla Placidia acting as regent during her son's minority. Theodosius II, the Eastern Emperor, had hesitated to announce the death of Honorius and in the ensuing interregnum, Joannes was nominated as Western Emperor. Joannes' "rule" was short and the forces of the East defeated and executed him in 425.[66] Boxwood relief depicting the liberation of a besieged city by a relief force, with those defending the walls making a sortie. Western Roman Empire, early 5th century AD After a violent struggle with several rivals, and against Placidia's wish, Aetius rose to the rank of magister militum. Aetius was able to stabilize the Western Empire's military situation somewhat, relying heavily on his Hunnic allies. With their help Aetius undertook extensive campaigns in Gaul, defeating the Visigoths in 437 and 438 but suffering a defeat himself in 439, ending the conflict in a status quo ante with a treaty.[67] Meanwhile, pressure from the Visigoths and a rebellion by Bonifacius, the governor of Africa, induced the Vandals under King Gaiseric to cross from Spain to Tingitana in what is now Morocco in 429. They temporarily halted in Numidia in 435 before moving eastward. With Aetius occupied in Gaul, the Western Roman government could do nothing to prevent the Vandals conquering the wealthy African provinces, culminating in the fall of Carthage on 19 October 439 and the establishment of the Vandal Kingdom. By the 400s, Italy and Rome itself were dependent on the taxes and foodstuffs from these provinces, leading to an economic crisis. With Vandal fleets becoming an increasing danger to Roman sea trade and the coasts and islands of the western and central Mediterranean, Aetius coordinated a counterattack against the Vandals in 440, organizing a large army in Sicily.[68] However, the plans for retaking Africa had to be abandoned due to the immediate need to combat the invading Huns, who in 444 were united under their ambitious king Attila. Turning against their former ally, the Huns became a formidable threat to the Empire. Aetius transferred his forces to the Danube,[68] though Attila concentrated on raiding the Eastern Roman provinces in the Balkans, providing temporary relief to the Western Empire. In 449, Attila received a message from Honoria, Valentinian III's sister, offering him half the western empire if he would rescue her from an unwanted marriage that her brother was forcing her into. With a pretext to invade the West, Attila secured peace with the Eastern court and crossed the Rhine in early 451.[69] With Attila wreaking havoc in Gaul, Aetius gathered a coalition of Roman and Germanic forces, including Visigoths and Burgundians, and prevented the Huns from taking the city of Aurelianum, forcing them into retreat.[70] At the Battle of the Catalaunian Plains, the Roman-Germanic coalition met and defeated the Hunnic forces, though Attila escaped.[71] Attila regrouped and invaded Italy in 452. With Aetius not having enough forces to attack him, the road to Rome was open. Valentinian sent Pope Leo I and two leading senators to negotiate with Attila. This embassy, combined with a plague among Attila's troops, the threat of famine, and news that the Eastern Emperor Marcian had launched an attack on the Hun homelands along the Danube, forced Attila to turn back and leave Italy. When Attila died unexpectedly in 453, the power struggle that erupted between his sons ended the threat posed by the Huns.[72] Internal unrest and Majorian[edit] The Western Roman Empire during the reign of Majorian in 460 AD. During his four-year-long reign from 457 to 461, Majorian successfully restored Western Roman authority in Hispania and most of Gaul. Despite his accomplishments, Roman rule in the west would last less than two more decades. Valentinian III was intimidated by Aetius and was encouraged by the Roman senator Petronius Maximus and the chamberlain Heraclius to assassinate him. When Aetius was at court in Ravenna delivering a financial account, Valentinian suddenly leaped from his seat and declared that he would no longer be the victim of Aetius' drunken depravities. Aetius attempted to defend himself from the charges, but Valentinian drew his sword and struck the weaponless Aetius on the head, killing him on the spot.[73] On 16 March the following year, Valentinian himself was killed by supporters of the dead general, possibly acting for Petronius Maximus. With the end of the Theodosian dynasty, Petronius Maximus proclaimed himself emperor during the ensuing period of unrest.[74] Petronius was not able to take effective control of the significantly weakened and unstable Empire. He broke the betrothal between Huneric, son of the Vandal king Gaiseric, and Eudocia, daughter of Valentinian III. This was seen as a just cause of war by King Gaiseric, who set sail to attack Rome. Petronius and his supporters attempted to flee the city at the sight of the approaching Vandals, only to be stoned to death by a Roman mob. Petronius had reigned only 11 weeks.[75] With the Vandals at the gates, Pope Leo I requested that the King not destroy the ancient city or murder its inhabitants, to which Gaiseric agreed and the city gates were opened to him. Though keeping his promise, Gaiseric looted great amounts of treasure and damaged objects of cultural significance such as the Temple of Jupiter Optimus Maximus. The severity of the Vandal sack of 455 is disputed, though with the Vandals plundering the city for a full fourteen days as opposed to the Visigothic sack of 410, where the Visigoths only spent three days in the city, it was likely more thorough.[76] Avitus, a prominent general under Petronius, was proclaimed emperor by the Visigothic king Theodoric II and accepted as such by the Roman Senate. Though supported by the Gallic provinces and the Visigoths, Avitus was resented in Italy due to ongoing food shortages caused by Vandal control of trade routes, and for using a Visigothic imperial guard. He disbanded his guard due to popular pressure, and the Suebian general Ricimer used the opportunity to depose Avitus, counting on popular discontent. After the deposition of Avitus, the Eastern Emperor Leo I did not select a new western Augustus. The prominent general Majorian defeated an invading force of Alemanni and was subsequently proclaimed Western Emperor by the army and eventually accepted as such by Leo.[77] Majorian was the last Western Emperor to attempt to recover the Western Empire with his own military forces. To prepare, Majorian significantly strengthened the Western Roman army by recruiting large numbers of barbarian mercenaries, among them the Gepids, Ostrogoths, Rugii, Burgundians, Huns, Bastarnae, Suebi, Scythians and Alans, and built two fleets, one at Ravenna, to combat the strong Vandalic fleet. Majorian personally led the army to wage war in Gaul, leaving Ricimer in Italy. The Gallic provinces and the Visigothic Kingdom had rebelled following the deposition of Avitus, refusing to acknowledge Majorian as lawful emperor. At the Battle of Arelate, Majorian decisively defeated the Visigoths under Theoderic II and forced them to relinquish their great conquests in Hispania and return to foederati status. Majorian then entered the Rhone Valley, where he defeated the Burgundians and reconquered the rebel city of Lugdunum. With Gaul back under Roman control, Majorian turned his eyes to the Vandals and Africa. Not only did the Vandals pose a constant danger to coastal Italy and trade in the Mediterranean, but the province they ruled was economically vital to the survival of the West. Majorian began a campaign to fully reconquer Hispania to use it as a base for the reconquest of Africa. Throughout 459, Majorian campaigned against the Suebi in northwestern Hispania.[77] The Vandals began to increasingly fear a Roman invasion. King Gaiseric tried to negotiate a peace with Majorian, who rejected the proposal. In the wake of this, Gaiseric devastated Mauretania, part of his own kingdom, fearing that the Roman army would land there. Having regained control of Hispania, Majorian intended to use his fleet at Carthaginiensis to attack the Vandals. Before he could, the fleet was destroyed, allegedly by traitors paid by the Vandals. Deprived of his fleet, Majorian had to cancel his attack on the Vandals and conclude a peace with Gaiseric. Disbanding his barbarian forces, Majorian intended to return to Rome and issue reforms, stopping at Arelate on his way. Here, Ricimer deposed and arrested him in 461, having gathered significant aristocratic opposition against Majorian. After five days of beatings and torture, Majorian was beheaded near the river Iria.[77] Collapse[edit] See also: Fall of the Western Roman Empire The Western and Eastern Roman Empire by 476 The final collapse of the Empire in the West was marked by increasingly ineffectual puppet Emperors dominated by their Germanic magister militums. The most pointed example of this is Ricimer, who effectively became a "shadow Emperor" following the depositions of Avitus and Majorian. Unable to take the throne for himself due to his barbarian heritage, Ricimer appointed a series of puppet Emperors who could do little to halt the collapse of Roman authority and the loss of the territories re-conquered by Majorian.[78] The first of these puppet emperors, Libius Severus, had no recognition outside of Italy, with the Eastern Emperor Leo I and provincial governors in Gaul and Illyria all refusing to recognize him.[79] Severus died in 465 and Leo I, with the consent of Ricimer, appointed the capable Eastern general Anthemius as Western Emperor following an eighteen-month interregnum. The relationship between Anthemius and the East was good, Anthemius is the last Western Emperor recorded in an Eastern law, and the two courts conducted a joint operation to retake Africa from the Vandals, culminating in the disastrous Battle of Cape Bon in 468. In addition Anthemius conducted failed campaigns against the Visigoths, hoping to halt their expansion.[78] The trial and subsequent execution of Romanus, an Italian senator and friend of Ricimer, on the grounds of treachery in 470 made Ricimer hostile to Anthemius. Following two years of ill feeling, Ricimer successfully deposed and killed Anthemius in 472, elevating Olybrius to the Western throne.[80] During the brief reign of Olybrius, Ricimer died and his nephew Gundobad succeeded him as magister militum. After only seven months of rule, Olybrius died of dropsy. Gundobad elevated Glycerius to Western Emperor. The Eastern Empire had rejected Olybrius and also rejected Glycerius, instead supporting a candidate of their own, Julius Nepos, magister militum in Dalmatia. With the support of Eastern Emperors Leo II and Zeno, Julius Nepos crossed the Adriatic Sea in the spring of 474 to depose Glycerius. At the arrival of Nepos in Italy, Glycerius abdicated without a fight and was allowed to live out his life as the Bishop of Salona.[81] The brief rule of Nepos in Italy ended in 475 when Orestes, a former secretary of Attila and the magister militum of Julius Nepos, took control of Ravenna and forced Nepos to flee by ship to Dalmatia. Later in the same year, Orestes crowned his own young son as Western Emperor under the name Romulus Augustus. Romulus Augustus was not recognised as Western Emperor by the Eastern Court, who maintained that Nepos was the only legal Western Emperor, reigning in exile from Dalmatia.[82] On 4 September 476, Odoacer, leader of the Germanic foederati in Italy, captured Ravenna, killed Orestes and deposed Romulus. Though Romulus was deposed, Nepos did not return to Italy and continued to reign as Western Emperor from Dalmatia, with support from Constantinople. Odoacer proclaimed himself ruler of Italy and began to negotiate with the Eastern Emperor Zeno. Zeno eventually granted Odoacer patrician status as recognition of his authority and accepted him as his viceroy of Italy. Zeno, however, insisted that Odoacer had to pay homage to Julius Nepos as the Emperor of the Western Empire. Odoacer accepted this condition and issued coins in the name of Julius Nepos throughout Italy. This, however, was mainly an empty political gesture, as Odoacer never returned any real power or territories to Nepos. The murder of Nepos in 480 prompted Odoacer to invade Dalmatia, annexing it to his Kingdom of Italy.[83] Fall of the Empire[edit] See also: Historiography of the fall of the Western Roman Empire The city of Ravenna, Western Roman capital, on the Tabula Peutingeriana, a 13th-century medieval map possibly copied from a 4th- or 5th-century Roman original By convention, the Western Roman Empire is deemed to have ended on 4 September 476, when Odoacer deposed Romulus Augustus, but the historical record calls this determination into question. Indeed, the deposition of Romulus Augustus received very little attention in contemporary times. Romulus was a usurper in the eyes of the Eastern Roman Empire and the remaining territories of Western Roman control outside of Italy, with the previous emperor Julius Nepos still being alive and claiming to rule the Western Empire in Dalmatia. Furthermore, the Western court had lacked true power and had been subject to Germanic aristocrats for decades, with most of its legal territory being under control of various barbarian kingdoms. With Odoacer recognising Julius Nepos, and later the Eastern Emperor Zeno, as his sovereign, nominal Roman control continued in Italy.[84] Syagrius, who had managed to preserve Roman sovereignty in an exclave in northern Gaul (a realm today known as the Domain of Soissons) also recognized Nepos as his sovereign and the legitimate Western Emperor.[85] The authority of Julius Nepos as Emperor was accepted not only by Odoacer in Italy, but by the Eastern Empire and Syagrius in Gaul (who had not recognized Romulus Augustulus). Nepos was murdered by his own soldiers in 480, a plot some attribute to Odoacer or the previous, deposed emperor Glycerius,[86] and the Eastern Emperor Zeno chose not to appoint a new western emperor. Zeno, recognizing that no true Roman control remained over the territories legally governed by the Western court, instead chose to abolish the juridical division of the position of Emperor and declared himself the sole emperor of the Roman Empire. Zeno became the first sole Roman emperor since the division after Theodosius I, 85 years prior, and the position would never again be divided. As such, the (eastern) Roman emperors after 480 are the successors of the western ones, albeit only in a juridical sense.[87] These emperors would continue to rule the Roman Empire until the Fall of Constantinople in 1453, nearly a thousand years later.[88] As 480 marks the end of the juridical division of the empire into two separate imperial courts, some historians refer to the death of Nepos and abolition of the Western Empire by Zeno as the end of the Western Roman Empire.[85][89] Despite the fall, or abolition, of the Western Empire, many of the new kings of western Europe continued to operate firmly within a Roman administrative framework. This is especially true in the case of the Ostrogoths, who came to rule Italy after Odoacer. They continued to use the administrative systems of Odoacer's kingdom, essentially those of the Western Roman Empire, and administrative positions continued to be staffed exclusively by Romans. The Senate continued to function as it always had, and the laws of the Empire were recognized as ruling the Roman population, though the Goths were ruled by their own traditional laws.[90] Western Roman administrative institutions, in particular those of Italy, thus continued to be used during "barbarian" rule and after the forces of the Eastern Roman empire re-conquered some of the formerly imperial territories. Some historians thus refer to the reorganizations of Italy and abolition of the old and separate Western Roman administrative units, such as the Praetorian prefecture of Italy, during the sixth century as the "true" fall of the Western Roman Empire.[84] Roman cultural traditions continued throughout the territory of the Western Empire for long after its disappearance, and a recent school of interpretation argues that the great political changes can more accurately be described as a complex cultural transformation, rather than a fall.[91] Political aftermath[edit] Map of the Barbarian kingdoms (major kingdoms and the Roman Empire labelled below) of the western Mediterranean in 526, seven years before the campaigns of reconquest under Eastern Emperor Justinian I   The Roman Empire under Justinian   The Vandal Kingdom   The Ostrogothic Kingdom of Italy   The Visigothic Kingdom   The Frankish Kingdom After the fall of the Western Roman Empire, the Germanic kingdoms, often referred to as "barbarian kingdoms", founded during its collapse continued to grow and prosper. Their beginnings, together with the end of the Western Roman Empire, mark the transition from Late Antiquity to the Middle Ages. The practices of the barbarian kingdoms gradually replaced the old Roman institutions, specifically in the praetorian prefectures of Gaul and Italy, during the sixth and seventh centuries.[92] In many places, the Roman institutions collapsed along with the economic stability. In some regions, notably Gaul and Italy, the settlement of barbarians on former Roman lands seems to have caused relatively little disruption, with barbarian rulers using and modifying the Roman systems already in place.[93] The Germanic kingdoms in Italy, Hispania and Gaul continued to recognise the Emperor in Constantinople as a somewhat nominal sovereign, the Visigoths minted coins in their names until the reign of Justinian I in the sixth century.[94] 6th-century Visigothic coin, struck in the name of Emperor Justinian I Some territories under direct Roman control continued to exist in the West even after 480. The Domain of Soissons, a rump state in Northern Gaul ruled by Syagrius, survived until 486 when it was conquered by the Franks under King Clovis I after the Battle of Soissons. Syagrius was known as the "King of the Romans" by the Germanic peoples of the region and repeatedly claimed that he was merely governing a Roman province, not an independent realm.[85] Under Clovis I from the 480s to 511, the Franks would come to develop into a great regional power. After their conquest of Soissons, the Franks defeated the Alemanni in 504 and conquered all Visigothic territory north of the Pyrenees other than Septimania in 507. Relations between the Franks and the Eastern Empire appear to have been positive, with Emperor Anastasius granting Clovis the title of consul following his victory against the Visigoths. At the time of its dissolution in the 800s, the Frankish Kingdom had lasted far longer than the other migration period barbarian kingdoms. Its divided successors would develop into the medieval states of France (initially known as West Francia) and Germany (initially known as East Francia).[95] A Mauro-Roman realm survived in the province of Mauretania Caesariensis until the early 8th century. An inscription on a fortification at the ruined city of Altava from the year 508 identifies a man named Masuna as the king of "Regnum Maurorum et Romanarum", the Kingdom of the Moors and Romans.[96] It is possible that Masuna is the same man as the "Massonas" who allied himself with the forces of the Eastern Roman Empire against the Vandals in 535.[97] This Kingdom was defeated by the Eastern Roman magister militum Gennadius in 578 and its coastal territories were incorporated into the Empire once more.[98] Germanic Italy[edit] Odoacer's Italy in 480 AD, following the annexation of Dalmatia The deposition of Romulus Augustus and the rise of Odoacer as ruler of Italy in 476 received very little attention at the time.[84] Overall, very little changed for the people; there was still a Roman Emperor in Constantinople to whom Odoacer had subordinated himself. Interregna had been experienced at many points in the West before and the deposition of Romulus Augustus was nothing out of the ordinary. Odoacer saw his rule as entirely in the tradition of the Roman Empire, not unlike Ricimer, and he effectively ruled as an imperial "governor" of Italy and was even awarded the title of patricius. Odoacer ruled using the Roman administrative systems already in place and continued to mint coins with the name and portrait of Julius Nepos until 480 and later with the name and portrait of the Eastern Augustus, rather than in his own name.[84] When Nepos was murdered in Dalmatia in 480, Odoacer assumed the duty of pursuing and executing the assassins and established his own rule in Dalmatia at the same time.[99] Odoacer established his power with the loyal support of the Roman Senate, a legislative body that had continued even without an emperor residing in Italy. Indeed, the Senate seems to have increased in power under Odoacer. For the first time since the mid-3rd century, copper coins were issued with the legend S C (Senatus Consulto). These coins were copied by Vandals in Africa and also formed the basis of the currency reform carried out by Emperor Anastasius in the East.[100] Under Odoacer, Western consuls continued to be appointed as they had been under the Western Roman Empire and were accepted by the Eastern Court, the first being Caecina Decius Maximus Basilus in 480. Basilus was made the praetorian prefect of Italy in 483, another traditional position which continued to exist under Odoacer.[101] Eleven further consuls were appointed by the Senate under Odoacer from 480 to 493 and one further Praetorian Prefect of Italy was appointed, Caecina Mavortius Basilius Decius (486–493).[102] Solidus minted under Odoacer with the name and portrait of the Eastern Emperor Zeno Though Odoacer ruled as a Roman governor would have and maintained himself as a subordinate to the remaining Empire, the Eastern Emperor Zeno began to increasingly see him as a rival. Thus, Zeno promised Theoderic the Great of the Ostrogoths, foederati of the Eastern Court, control over the Italian peninsula if he was able to defeat Odoacer.[103] Theoderic led the Ostrogoths across the Julian Alps and into Italy and defeated Odoacer in battle twice in 489. Following four years of hostilities between them, John, the Bishop of Ravenna, was able to negotiate a treaty in 493 between Odoacer and Theoderic whereby they agreed to rule Ravenna and Italy jointly. Theoderic entered Ravenna on 5 March and Odoacer was dead ten days later, killed by Theoderic after sharing a meal with him.[104] Map of the realm of Theodoric the Great at its height in 523, following the annexation of the southern parts of the Burgundian kingdom. Theoderic ruled both the Visigothic and Ostrogothic kingdoms and exerted hegemony over the Burgundians and Vandals. Theoderic inherited Odoacer's role as acting viceroy for Italy and ostensibly a patricius and subject of the emperor in Constantinople. This position was recognized by Emperor Anastasius in 497, four years after Theoderic had defeated Odoacer. Though Theodoric acted as an independent ruler, he meticulously preserved the outward appearance of his subordinate position. Theoderic continued to use the administrative systems of Odoacer's kingdom, essentially those of the Western Roman Empire, and administrative positions continued to be staffed exclusively by Romans. The senate continued to function as it always had and the laws of the Empire were recognized as ruling the Roman population, though the Goths were ruled by their own traditional laws. As a subordinate, Theoderic did not have the right to issue his own laws, only edicts or clarifications.[105] The army and military offices were exclusively staffed by the Goths, however, who largely settled in northern Italy.[106] Though acting as a subordinate in domestic affairs, Theodoric acted increasingly independent in his foreign policies. Seeking to counterbalance the influence of the Empire in the East, Theoderic married his daughters to the Visigothic king Alaric II and the Burgundian prince Sigismund. His sister Amalfrida was married to the Vandal king Thrasamund and he married Audofleda, sister of the Frankish king Clovis I, himself.[107] Through these alliances and occasional conflicts, the territory controlled by Theoderic in the early sixth century nearly constituted a restored Western Roman Empire. Ruler of Italy since 493, Theoderic became king of the Visigoths in 511 and exerted hegemony over the Vandals in North Africa between 521 and 523. As such, his rule extended throughout the western Mediterranean. The Western imperial regalia, housed in Constantinople since the deposition of Romulus Augustulus in 476, were returned to Ravenna by Emperor Anastasius in 497.[108] Theoderic, by now Western Emperor in all but name, could not, however, assume an imperial title, not only because the notion of a separate Western court had been abolished but also due to his "barbarian" heritage, which, like that of Ricimer before him, would have barred him from assuming the throne.[78] With the death of Theodoric in 526, his network of alliances began to collapse. The Visigoths regained autonomy under King Amalaric and the Ostrogoths' relations with the Vandals turned increasingly hostile under the reign of their new king Athalaric, a child under the regency of his mother Amalasuntha.[109] After the collapse of Theoderic's control of the western Mediterranean, the Frankish Kingdom rose to become the most powerful of the barbarian kingdoms, having taken control of most of Gaul in the absence of Roman governance.[95] Amalasuntha continued the policies of conciliation between the Goths and Romans, supporting the new Eastern Emperor Justinian I and allowing him to use Sicily as a staging point during the reconquest of Africa in the Vandalic War. With the death of Athalaric in 534, Amalasuntha crowned her cousin and only relative Theodahad as king, hoping for his support. Instead, Amalasuntha was imprisoned and, even though Theodahad assured Emperor Justinian of her safety, she was executed shortly after. This served as an ideal casus belli for Justinian, who prepared to invade and reclaim the Italian peninsula for the Roman Empire.[109] Imperial reconquest[edit] Further information: Vandalic War and Gothic War (535–554) The Eastern Roman Empire, by reoccupying some of the former Western Roman Empire's lands, enlarged its territory considerably during Justinian's reign from 527 (red) to 565 (orange). With Emperor Zeno having juridically reunified the Empire into one imperial court, the remaining Eastern Roman Empire continued to lay claim to the areas previously controlled by the Western court throughout Late Antiquity and the Middle Ages. Though military campaigns had been conducted by the Western court prior to 476 with the aim of recapturing lost territory, most notably under Majorian, the reconquests, if successful at all, were only momentary. It was as a result of the campaigns of the generals Belisarius and Narses on behalf of the Eastern Roman Emperor Justinian I from 533 to 554 that long-lasting reconquests of Roman lands were witnessed.[110] Despite also suffering from barbarian incursions, the Eastern Empire had survived the fifth century mostly intact. The Western Roman Empire, less urbanized than the Eastern and more thinly populated, may have experienced an economic decline throughout the Late Empire in some provinces.[111] Southern Italy, northern Gaul (except for large towns and cities), and to some extent Spain and the Danubian areas may have suffered. The East fared better economically, especially as Emperors such as Constantine the Great and Constantius II had invested heavily in the eastern economy. As a result, the Eastern Empire could afford large numbers of professional soldiers and to augment them with mercenaries, while the Western Roman Empire could not afford this to the same extent. Even after major defeats, the East could, although not without difficulties, buy off its enemies with a ransom or "protection money".[112] Numbering more than 300,000 soldiers, the Eastern Roman army of Justinian I was among the most powerful in the world.[113] Unlike the Visigoths and Ostrogoths, the Vandals in Africa minted their own coinage and were both de facto and de jure independent, often being enemies of both the Western and Eastern Roman Empires.[114] With the pro-Roman Vandal king Hilderic having been deposed by Gelimer in 530,[115] Justinian prepared an expedition led by Belisarius. It swiftly retook North Africa between June 533 and March 534, returning the wealthy province to Roman rule. Following the reconquest, Justinian swiftly reintroduced the Roman administrations of the province, establishing a new Praetorian Prefecture of Africa and taking measures to decrease Vandal influence, eventually leading to the complete disappearance of the Vandalic people.[116] Justinian I (left) was the first Eastern Emperor to attempt to reconquer the territories of the Western Roman Empire, undertaking successful campaigns in Africa and Italy in the 500s. Manuel I Komnenos (right) was the last, campaigning in southern Italy in the 1150s. Following the execution of the pro-Roman Ostrogoth queen Amalasuntha and the refusal of Ostrogoth King Theodahad to renounce his control of Italy, Justinian ordered the expedition to move on to reconquer Italy, ancient heartland of the Empire. From 534 to 540, the Roman forces campaigned in Italy and captured Ravenna, the Ostrogothic and formerly Western Roman capital, in 540. The Gothic resistance revived under King Totila in 541. They were finally defeated following campaigns by the Roman general Narses, who also repelled invasions into Italy by the Franks and Alemanni, though some cities in northern Italy continued to hold out until the 560s. Justinian promulgated the Pragmatic Sanction to reorganize the governance of Italy and the province was returned to Roman rule. The end of the conflict saw Italy devastated and considerably depopulated, which, combined with the disastrous effects of the Plague of Justinian, made it difficult to retain over the following centuries.[117] At the time of the collapse of the Western Empire in 476–480, the Visigoths controlled large areas of southern Gaul as well as a majority of Hispania. Their increased domain had been partly conquered and partly awarded to them by the Western Emperor Avitus in the 450s–60s.[118] Justinian undertook some limited campaigns against them, recovering portions of the southern coast of the Iberian peninsula. Here, the province of Spania would last until the 620s, when the Visigoths under King Suintila reconquered the south coast.[119] These regions remained under Roman control throughout the reign of Justinian. Three years after his death, the Lombards invaded Italy. The Lombards conquered large parts of the devastated peninsula in the late 500s, establishing the Lombard Kingdom. They were in constant conflict with the Exarchate of Ravenna, a polity established to replace the old Praetorian Prefecture of Italy and enforce Roman rule in Italy. The wealthiest parts of the province, including the cities of Rome and Ravenna, remained securely in Roman hands under the Exarchate throughout the seventh century.[120] Map of the Eastern Roman Empire in 717 AD. Over the course of the seventh and eighth centuries, Islamic expansion had ended Roman rule in Africa and though some bastions of Roman rule remained, most of Italy was controlled by the Lombards. Although other Eastern emperors occasionally attempted to campaign in the West, none were as successful as Justinian. After 600, events conspired to drive the Western provinces out of Constantinople's control, with imperial attention focused on the pressing issues of war with Sasanian Persia and then the rise of Islam. For a while, the West remained important, with Emperor Constans II ruling from Syracuse in Sicily a Roman Empire that still stretched from North Africa to the Caucasus in the 660s. Thereafter, imperial attention declined, with Constantinople itself being besieged in the 670s, renewed war with the Arabs in the 680s, and then a period of chaos between 695 and 717, during which time Africa was finally lost once and for all, being conquered by the Umayyad Caliphate. Through reforms and military campaigns, Emperor Leo III attempted to restore order in the Empire, but his doctrinal reforms, known as the Iconoclastic Controversy, were extremely unpopular in the West and were condemned by Pope Gregory III.[121] The Roman Empire was not the only Christian nation affected by the Islamic conquests, the Visigothic Kingdom finally fell to the Umayyad Caliphate in the 720s.[122][123] The Kingdom of Asturias was founded by Pelagius of Asturias around the same time and was the first Christian realm to be established in Iberia following the defeat of the Visigoths.[124] Asturias would be transformed into the Kingdom of León in 924,[125] which would develop into the predecessors of modern-day Spain.[126] The religious disagreements between Rome and Constantinople eventually led to the breakdown in imperial rule over Rome itself, and the gradual transition of the Exarchate of Ravenna into the independent Papal States, led by the Pope. In an attempt to gain support against the Lombards, the Pope called for aid from the Frankish Kingdom instead of the Eastern Empire, eventually crowning the Frankish king Charlemagne as "Roman Emperor" in 800 AD. Though this coronation was strongly opposed by the Eastern Empire, there was little they could do as their influence in Western Europe decreased. After a series of small wars in the 810s, Emperor Michael I recognized Charlemagne as an "Emperor". He refused to recognize him as a "Roman Emperor" (a title which Michael reserved for himself and his successors), instead recognizing him as the slightly less prestigious "Emperor of the Franks".[127] Imperial rule continued in Sicily throughout the eighth century, with the island slowly being overrun by the Arabs during the course of the ninth century. In Italy, a few strongholds in Calabria provided a base for a later, modest imperial expansion, which reached its peak in the early eleventh century, with most of southern Italy under Roman rule of a sort. This, however, was undone by further civil wars in the Empire, and the slow conquest of the region by the Empire's former mercenaries, the Normans, who finally put an end to imperial rule in Western Europe in 1071 with the conquest of Bari.[128] The last Emperor to attempt reconquests in the West was Manuel I Komnenos, who invaded southern Italy during a war with the Norman Kingdom of Sicily in the 1150s. The city of Bari willingly opened its gates to the Emperor and after successes in taking other cities in the region,[129] Manuel dreamed of a restored Roman Empire and a union between the churches of Rome and Constantinople, separated since the schism of 1054. Despite initial successes and Papal support, the campaign was unsuccessful and Manuel was forced to return east.[130] Legacy[edit] Further information: Legacy of the Roman Empire, Romance languages, Corpus Juris Civilis, Civil law (legal system), Latin alphabet, Literature, Bust (sculpture), Concrete, and Cities On the left: Emperor Honorius on the consular diptych of Anicius Petronius Probus (406) On the right: Consular diptych of Constantius III (a co-emperor with Honorius in 421), produced for his consulate in 413 or 417. As the Western Roman Empire crumbled, the new Germanic rulers who conquered its constituent provinces maintained most Roman laws and traditions. Many of the invading Germanic tribes were already Christianized, although most were followers of Arianism. They quickly changed their adherence to the state church of the Roman Empire. This helped cement the loyalty of the local Roman populations, as well as the support of the powerful Bishop of Rome. Although they initially continued to recognize indigenous tribal laws, they were more influenced by Roman law and gradually incorporated it.[92] Roman law, particularly the Corpus Juris Civilis collected on the orders of Justinian I, is the basis of modern civil law. In contrast, common law is based on Germanic Anglo-Saxon law. Civil law is by far the most widespread system of law in the world, in force in some form in about 150 countries.[131] Romance languages, languages that developed from Latin following the collapse of the Western Roman Empire, are spoken in Western Europe to this day and their extent almost reflects the continental borders of the old Empire. Latin as a language did not disappear. Vulgar Latin combined with neighboring Germanic and Celtic languages, giving rise to modern Romance languages such as Italian, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Romanian, and a large number of minor languages and dialects. Today, more than 900 million people are native speakers of Romance languages worldwide. In addition, many Romance languages are used as lingua francas by non-native speakers.[132] Latin also influenced Germanic languages such as English and German.[133] It survives in a "purer" form as the language of the Catholic Church; the Catholic Mass was spoken exclusively in Latin until 1969. As such it was also used as a lingua franca by ecclesiasticals. It remained the language of medicine, law, and diplomacy (most treaties were written in Latin[citation needed]), as well as of intellectuals and scholarship, well into the 18th century. Since then the use of Latin has declined with the growth of other lingua francas, especially English and French.[134] The Latin alphabet was expanded due to the split of I into I and J, and of V into U, V, and, in places (especially Germanic languages and Polish), W. It is the most widely used alphabetic writing system in the world today.[citation needed] Roman numerals continue to be used in some fields and situations, though they have largely been replaced by Arabic numerals.[135] A very visible legacy of the Western Roman Empire is the Catholic Church. Church institutions slowly began to replace Roman ones in the West, even helping to negotiate the safety of Rome during the late 5th century.[72] As Rome was invaded by Germanic tribes, many assimilated, and by the middle of the medieval period (c. 9th and 10th centuries) the central, western, and northern parts of Europe had been largely converted to Roman Catholicism and acknowledged the Pope as the Vicar of Christ. The first of the Barbarian kings to convert to the Church of Rome was Clovis I of the Franks; other kingdoms, such as the Visigoths, later followed suit to garner favor with the papacy.[136] When Pope Leo III crowned Charlemagne as "Roman Emperor" in 800, he both severed ties with the outraged Eastern Empire and established the precedent that no man in Western Europe would be emperor without a papal coronation.[137] Although the power the Pope wielded changed significantly throughout the subsequent periods, the office itself has remained as the head of the Catholic Church and the head of state of the Vatican City. The Pope has consistently held the title of "Pontifex Maximus" since before the fall of the Western Roman Empire and retains it to this day; this title formerly used by the high priest of the Roman polytheistic religion, one of whom was Julius Caesar.[45][138] The Roman Senate survived the initial collapse of the Western Roman Empire. Its authority increased under the rule of Odoacer and later the Ostrogoths, evident by the Senate in 498 managing to install Symmachus as pope despite both Theodoric of Italy and Emperor Anastasius supporting another candidate, Laurentius.[139] Exactly when the senate disappeared is unclear, but the institution is known to have survived at least into the 6th century, inasmuch as gifts from the senate were received by Emperor Tiberius II in 578 and 580. The traditional senate building, Curia Julia, was rebuilt into a church under Pope Honorius I in 630, probably with permission from the eastern emperor, Heraclius.[140] Nomenclature[edit] Marcellinus Comes, a sixth-century Eastern Roman historian and a courtier of Justinian I, mentions the Western Roman Empire in his Chronicle, which primarily covers the Eastern Roman Empire from 379 to 534. In the Chronicle, it is clear that Marcellinus made a clear divide between East and West, with mentions of a geographical east ("Oriens") and west ("Occidens") and of an imperial east ("Orientale imperium" and "Orientale respublica") and an imperial west ("Occidentalie imperium", "Occidentale regnum", "Occidentalis respublica", "Hesperium regnum", "Hesperium imperium" and "principatum Occidentis"). Furthermore, Marcellinus specifically designates some emperors and consuls as being "Eastern", "Orientalibus principibus" and "Orientalium consulum" respectively.[141] The term Hesperium Imperium, translating to "Western Empire", has sometimes been applied to the Western Roman Empire by modern historians as well.[142] Though Marcellinus does not refer to the Empire as a whole after 395, only to its separate parts, he clearly identifies the term "Roman" as applying to the Empire as a whole. When using terms such as "us", "our generals", and "our emperor", Marcellinus distinguished both divisions of the Empire from outside foes such as the Sasanian Persians and the Huns.[141] This view is consistent with the view that contemporary Romans of the 4th and 5th centuries continued to consider the Empire as a single unit, although more often than not with two rulers instead of one.[89] The first time the Empire was divided geographically was during the reign of Diocletian, but there was precedent for multiple emperors. Before Diocletian and the Tetrarchy, there had been a number of periods where there were co-emperors, such as with Caracalla and Geta in 210–211, who inherited the imperial throne from their father Septimius Severus, but Caracalla ruled alone after the murder of his brother.[143] Attempted restorations of a Western court[edit] Maps of the Exarchates within the Roman Empire in 600 AD. The Exarchates of Ravenna (left) and Africa (right) were established by the Eastern Empire to better administer the reconquered Western territories. The positions of Eastern and Western Augustus, established under Emperor Diocletian in 286 as the Tetrarchy, had been abolished by Emperor Zeno in 480 following the loss of direct control over the western territories. Declaring himself the sole Augustus, Zeno only exercised true control over the largely intact Eastern Empire and over Italy as the nominal overlord of Odoacer.[87] The reconquests under Justinian I would bring back large formerly Western Roman territories into Imperial control, and with them the Empire would begin to face the same problems it had faced under previous periods prior to the Tetrarchy when there had been only one ruler. Shortly after the reconquest of North Africa a usurper, Stotzas, appeared in the province (though he was quickly defeated).[144] As such, the idea of dividing the Empire into two courts out of administrative necessity would see a limited revival during the period that the Eastern Empire controlled large parts of the former West, both by courtiers in the East and enemies in the West.[145][146] The earliest attempt at crowning a new Western Emperor after the abolition of the title occurred already during the Gothic Wars under Justinian. Belisarius, an accomplished general who had already successfully campaigned to restore Roman control over North Africa and large parts of Italy, including Rome itself, was offered the position of Western Roman Emperor by the Ostrogoths during his siege of Ravenna (the Ostrogothic, and previously Western Roman, capital) in 540. The Ostrogoths, desperate to avoid losing their control of Italy, offered the title and their fealty to Belisarius as Western Augustus. Justinian had expected to rule over a restored Roman Empire alone, with the Codex Justinianeus explicitly designating the new Praetorian Prefect of Africa as the subject of Justinian in Constantinople.[147] Belisarius, loyal to Justinian, feigned acceptance of the title to enter the city, whereupon he immediately relinquished it. Despite Belisarius relinquishing the title, the offer had made Justinian suspicious and Belisarius was ordered to return east.[145] At the end of Emperor Tiberius II's reign in 582, the Eastern Roman Empire retained control over relatively large parts of the regions reconquered under Justinian. Tiberius chose two Caesares, the general Maurice and the governor Germanus, and married his two daughters to them. Germanus had clear connections to the western provinces, and Maurice to the eastern provinces. It is possible that Tiberius was planning to divide the empire into western and eastern administrative units once more.[146] If so, the plan was never realized. At the death of Tiberius, Maurice inherited the entire empire as Germanus had refused the throne. Maurice established a new type of administrative unit, the Exarchate, and organized the remaining western territories under his control into the Exarchate of Ravenna and the Exarchate of Africa.[148] Later claims to the Imperial title in the West[edit] See also: Problem of two emperors Denarius of Frankish king Charlemagne, who was crowned as Roman Emperor Karolus Imperator Augustus in the year 800 by Pope Leo III due to, and in opposition to, the Roman Empire in the East being ruled by Irene, a woman. His coronation was strongly opposed by the Eastern Empire. In addition to remaining as a concept for an administrative unit in the remaining Empire, the ideal of the Roman Empire as a mighty Christian Empire with a single ruler further continued to appeal to many powerful rulers in western Europe. With the papal coronation of Charlemagne as "Emperor of the Romans" in 800 AD, his realm was explicitly proclaimed as a restoration of the Roman Empire in Western Europe under the concept of translatio imperii. Though the Carolingian Empire collapsed in 888 and Berengar, the last "Emperor" claiming succession from Charlemagne, died in 924, the concept of a papacy- and Germanic-based Roman Empire in the West would resurface in the form of the Holy Roman Empire in 962. The Holy Roman Emperors would uphold the notion that they had inherited the supreme power and prestige of the Roman Emperors of old until the dissolution of the Holy Roman Empire in 1806.[149] Charlemagne, and the subsequent Holy Roman Emperors, were not, and did not claim to be, rulers of a restored Western Roman Empire. Pope Leo III and contemporary historians were fully aware of that the notion of a separate Western court had been abolished over three centuries prior and considered the Roman Empire to be "one and indivisible". The ruler of the Roman Empire at the time of Charlemagne's coronation was Irene, the mother of emperor Constantine VI who she had deposed. Leo III considered Irene to be a usurper and illegitimate to rule due to her gender and as such considered the imperial throne to be vacant. Thus, Charlemagne was not crowned as the ruler of the Western Roman Empire and successor to Romulus Augustulus, but rather as the successor of Constantine VI and as sole Roman Emperor. Irene was deposed and replaced by Emperor Nikephoros soon after, and the Eastern Empire refused to recognize the Imperial title of Charlemagne. Following several wars in the 810s Emperor Michael I Rangabe eventually recognized Charlemagne as an "Emperor", but as the slightly humiliating "Emperor of the Franks" rather than "Roman Emperor", a title he reserved for himself.[127] For centuries to come, the "revived" Western court and the Eastern court, in direct succession to the Roman Emperors of old, would make competing claims to be rulers of the whole Roman Empire. With the Eastern Empire terming the Holy Roman Empire as an "Empire of the Franks", the term "Empire of the Greeks" was popularized in the Frankish court as a way to refer to the Empire centered in Constantinople.[150] Following the end of the Eastern Roman Empire after the Fall of Constantinople in 1453 and the dissolution of the Holy Roman Empire in 1806, the title of "Emperor" became widespread among European monarchs. The Austrian Empire laid claim to be the heir of the Holy Roman Empire as Austria's Habsburgs attempted to unite Germany under their rule.[151] The German Empire, established in 1871, also claimed to be a successor of Rome through the lineage of the Holy Roman Empire.[152] Both of these empires used the imperial title Kaiser (derived from the Latin word "Caesar"), the German word for emperor. The German Empire and Austria-Hungary, successor of the Austrian Empire, would both fall in the aftermath of the First World War along with the Russian and Ottoman Empires who had both claimed succession from the Eastern Roman Empire.[153][154][155] List of Western Roman Emperors[edit] With junior colleagues titled Caesar listed below the reign of each emperor. Tetrarchy (286–313)[edit] Main article: Tetrarchy Bust of Emperor Maximian, the first Western Roman Emperor Maximian: 286–305[156] Constantius Chlorus: 293–305[157] Maximian was elevated to caesar by Diocletian in 285, after Diocletian defeated Carinus.[158] He became Western Emperor in 286, with the establishment of the Tetrarchy. On 1 May 305, both Maximian and Diocletian abdicated, leaving Constantius and Galerius as emperors.[159] Constantius I Chlorus: 305–306[160] Valerius Severus: 305–306[161] Constantius Chlorus was elevated to caesar in 293, under Maximian. Constantius became the Western Emperor in 305, after the abdication of Maximian.[159] Constantius died on 25 July 306, leaving a highly contested succession in his wake.[162] Valerius Severus: 306–307[161] Constantine: 306–307[161] Valerius Severus was elevated to caesar by Constantius in 305, after the abdication of Maximian and Diocletian. After the death of Constantius in 306, Severus became Western Emperor. Severus was forced to deal with the revolt of Maxentius, the son of Maximian. Maxentius invaded in early 307, and successfully captured the Western Empire.[163] He had Severus put to death soon after his capture.[164] Maxentius: 307–312[161] Maxentius was proclaimed emperor in 306, in opposition to Valerius Severus. He succeeded in capturing the Western Empire in 307, and had Severus killed soon after.[165] The Western Empire was invaded in 312 by Constantine, who on 28 October 312 decisively defeated Maxentius, who drowned when his forces were pushed back into the Tiber river.[166] Licinius: 308–313[161] Licinius was made emperor of the Eastern Empire, and parts of the Western Empire, all of which was actually held by Maxentius, at the Council of Carnuntum, which was held in 308 in order to try to end the civil war in the Western Empire. Constantine invaded Licinius' section of the Western Empire in 313, and forced him to sign a treaty in which he forfeited his claim to the Western Empire, and only controlled the Eastern Empire.[167] Constantinian dynasty (309–363)[edit] Main article: Constantinian dynasty Bust of Emperor Constantine I, the founder of the Constantinian dynasty Constantine I: 309–337 (Sole Emperor: 324–337).[161] Constantine I was proclaimed caesar of the Western Empire on 25 July 306. After 309 he proclaimed himself as the Western Emperor, in opposition to Maxentius and Licinius. He was the sole Western Emperor from 312–324, when he became both Western Emperor and Eastern Emperor.[168] Constantine II 337–340 (Emperor of Gaul, Britannia and Hispania: 337–340).[161] Constantine II was proclaimed caesar of the Eastern Empire in late 317. In 335, Constantine I allotted the inheritance his sons would receive after his death, which would take place two years later in 337, giving Constantine II control of Gaul, Britannia and Hispania. Constantine II's relationship with Constans I was tense, and in 340, Constantine took advantage of Constans absence from Italy and invaded it. However, in the same year, he was ambushed by Constans' forces in Aquilea, and was killed.[169] Constans I 337–350 (Emperor of Italy and Africa: 337–340, Western Emperor: 340–350).[161] Constans was proclaimed emperor of Italy and Africa in 337, after the death of Constantine I. After Constantine II was killed in 340, while attempting to invade Constans' territory in Italy, Constans took control of the entire Western Empire. Constans was contemptuous of his army, who as a result proclaimed Magnentius as emperor in 350. Constans fled toward Hispania, but was captured and executed by an agent of Magnentius on the border.[170] Constantius II 351–361 (Eastern Emperor: 337–351, Sole Emperor: 351–361).[161] Julian: 355–361[161] Constantius II was proclaimed caesar in 334, and became Eastern Emperor in 337, after the death of Constantine I. After Constans was killed by the usurper Magnentius, Constantius laid claim to the Western Empire, and after defeating Magnentius in 351, took possession of it, becoming sole emperor. Constantius II died in 361, of a violent fever.[171] Julian: 361–363 (Sole Emperor).[161] Julian was proclaimed caesar in 355, before becoming emperor in 361, after Constantius II died of a violent fever in 361. Julian died in March 363, of wounds sustained during the Battle of Samarra.[172] Non-dynastic (363–364)[edit] Jovian: 363–364 (Sole Emperor).[161] When Julian died in 363, he left no heir, causing a succession crisis. The Roman Army elected Jovian as sole emperor. Jovian reigned only seven months, in which he signed a humiliating peace treaty with the Sasanian Empire, under Shapur II. In this agreement, Rome surrendered five provinces and 18 fortresses to the Sasanians, in exchange for a 30-year truce. Jovian died on 16 February 364, due to either indigestion or charcoal vapour inhalation.[173] Valentinianic dynasty (364–392)[edit] Main article: Valentinianic dynasty Bust of Emperor Valentinian II, a member of the Valentinianic dynasty's second generation of emperors Valentinian I: 364–375[161] Gratian: 367–375[161] After the death of Jovian, Valentinian I was elected. He divided the Empire between himself and his younger brother, Valens, giving himself the West and Valens the East. Valentinian spent much of his reign defending Gaul against repeated attacks by barbarian tribes, only leaving the region in 373. In 375, while meeting with the Quadi, he suffered a stroke brought on by rage.[174] Gratian: 375–383[161] Valentinian II: 375–383[161] Valentinian elevated his son, Gratian, to caesar in 367, however on his deathbed he elevated his much younger son, Valentinian II, to caesar along with Gratian, and Valens who was emperor in the East.[175] Gratian showed a strong preference for the barbarian mercenaries in his army, especially his Alanic guard, which inflamed the Roman population, to the point that in 383, Roman troops in Britain declared Magnus Maximus emperor, in opposition to Gratian. Maximus landed troops in Gaul, and attacked Gratian's troops near Paris. Gratian was defeated, and fled to Lyons, where he was murdered on 25 August 383.[176] Valentinian II: 383–392[161] After the death of Gratian, Valentinian II succeeded him, although he only controlled Italy itself, with all other Western Roman provinces recognizing Maximus. In 387 Maximus invaded Italy, to depose Valentinian. Valentinian fled to the court of Theodosius, where he succeeded in convincing Theodosius to attack Maximus, and to reinstate himself as Western Emperor, which was done after Maximus was defeated in battle near Aquileia.[176] Valentinian continued to rule the Western Empire until 392, when he was murdered by Arbogast.[177] Magnus Maximus: 384–388[178][179] Flavius Victor: 383/387–388[178][180][181] Magnus Maximus was elected emperor by his men in 384, in opposition to Gratian, who defeated him in battle in 383. Maximus was briefly recognized as the Western Emperor by Eastern Emperor Theodosius I, however this recognition was revoked by both when Maximus invaded Italy and deposed Valentinian II in 387. Valentinian II fled to the Eastern Roman Empire, and convinced Theodosius to invade the Western Roman Empire and restore him to the Western Roman throne, which he did in 388. Maximus was defeated in battle near Aquileia, and executed.[176][178][180][181] Theodosian dynasty (392–455)[edit] Main article: Theodosian dynasty Emperor Honorius, as depicted by Jean-Paul Laurens in 1880 Theodosius I: 394–395 (Eastern Roman Emperor: 379–394, sole Emperor: 394–395)[161] Theodosius was proclaimed Eastern Emperor by Gratian on 19 January 379, after securing victory against invading barbarians along the Danube. He became sole emperor in August 394, after defeating the usurper Eugenius. Theodosius died of edema in January 395.[182] Honorius: 395–423[161] Constantine III: 409–411[161] Constans II: 409–411[161] Constantius III: 421.[161] Honorius became Western Emperor in 395, after the death of his father Theodosius. His reign was beset by barbarian invasions, and for much of his early reign, until 408, he was controlled by Stilicho, whose influence over Honorius would create a standard for puppet Western Emperors. Honorius died of edema in 423.[183] Valentinian III: 425–455[161] Valentinian III was designated Honorius' heir in 421, although he was not proclaimed caesar, only given the title of nobilissimus puer. In 423, after the death of Honorius, a usurper named Joannes rose up, forcing Valentinian III to flee with his family to the court of the Eastern Emperor Theodosius II. He was installed as Western Emperor in 425, after Joannes was defeated by Theodosius in Ravenna. Valentinian was killed on 16 March 455, by Optila, a friend of Flavius Aetius, whom Valentinian had killed.[184] Non-dynastic (455–480)[edit] Petronius Maximus: 455 (Not recognized by Eastern Emperor)[161] Palladius: 455.[185] Petronius Maximus became the Western Roman Emperor on 17 March 455, after assassinating Valentinian III.[185] During his short reign, he provoked Gaiseric, the Vandal king, into invading the Western Empire and sacking Rome, by breaking a marriage agreement made between Gaiseric and Valentinian III. Maximus and his son Palladius attempted to flee on 31 May 455, however they were apprehended by a group of peasants, and either killed by them, or by palace servants wishing to curry favor with them.[186][187] Avitus: 455–456 (Not recognized by Eastern Emperor)[161] Avitus was proclaimed Western Emperor on 9 July 455, with the support of the Visigoth King Theodoric II. While he held support from the Visigoths, his rule alienated both the Roman Senate and people. In 456 Ricimer, a senior officer, had Avitus deposed, and ruled the Western Empire through a series of puppet emperors until his death in 472.[188] Majorian: 457–461[161] Majorian was proclaimed Western Emperor 1 April 456, officially by Eastern Emperor Leo I, however in reality Leo's decision was swayed by the influence of Ricimer. On 7 August 461, Majorian was compelled to abdicate, and reportedly died five days later of dysentery, although modern historians have asserted he was likely murdered.[189] Libius Severus: 461–465 (Not recognized by Eastern Emperor)[161] Libius Severus was proclaimed Western Emperor on 19 November 461. His rule, even as a puppet emperor, extended little beyond Italy, with Aegidius splitting off from the Western Empire, and establishing the Kingdom of Soissons. Libius Severus incited the hostility of the Vandals, who invaded Italy and Sicily. During these events, Libius Severus died on 14 November 465, possibly due to being poisoned by Ricimer.[190] Anthemius: 467–472[161] Anthemius was proclaimed Western Emperor on 12 April 467 by Leo I. Under Anthemius, the Western Empire, which had become increasingly isolated from the Eastern Empire, grew closer, although this collaboration came too late to save the Western Empire. Anthemius' friendly attitude towards the Eastern Empire angered Ricimer, who deposed him in March or April of 472.[191] Olybrius: 472 (Not recognized by Eastern Emperor)[161] Olybrius was proclaimed emperor in April 472. His brief reign, lasting only five or six months, was dominated by Gundobad, who had replaced his uncle Ricimer as the true power behind the throne, after the former's death. Olybrius died in October or November 472, of edema.[192] Glycerius: 473–474 (Not recognized by Eastern Emperor)[161] After the death of both Olybrius and Ricimer, Glycerius was proclaimed Western Emperor by the Western Roman Army, on 3 or 5 May 473.[193] He was deposed by Julius Nepos in July 474, and sent to live in a monastery, where he remained until his death.[194] Julius Nepos: 474–475 (In exile 475–480)[195] The Eastern Roman Empire had rejected the coronation of both Olybrius and Glycerius, instead supporting Julius Nepos, magister militum in Dalmatia as Western Roman Emperor. Nepos, with support from the East, deposed Glycerius in the spring of 474.[81] Orestes, magister militum of Nepos, deposed him a year later in 475, forcing Nepos to flee Ravenna to his estates in Dalmatia. Orestes crowned his son Romulus as Western Emperor, though the Eastern Empire and the Western possessions outside of Italy maintained recognition of Nepos as the legitimate Emperor.[82] Nepos continued to rule as "Western Emperor" in exile in Dalmatia until his murder in 480 and would be the last holder of the title.[86] Romulus Augustus: 475–476 (Not recognized by Eastern Emperor)[195] Romulus Augustus was crowned as Western Emperor after his father Orestes deposed Julius Nepos.[82] The rule of Romulus would be brief; in the autumn of 476 the foederati under the control of Odoacer rebelled when their demands for a third of the land of Italy were ignored.[196] Orestes was captured and executed on 28 August the same year and Romulus was deposed by Odoacer a week later. Romulus was spared and allowed to live out his life in the Castellum Lucullanum in Campania, where he might have been alive as late as 507 AD.[197] With the deposition of Romulus Augustus by Odoacer, direct Roman control ceased to exist in Italy. Odoacer assumed control of the peninsula as a de jure representative of Western Roman Emperor Nepos. With the death of Nepos in 480, the Eastern Roman Emperor Zeno abolished the title and position of Western Roman Emperor and assumed the role of Odoacer's sovereign. The position of Roman Emperor would never again be divided, though some new candidates for the position of Western emperor were proposed during and after the Eastern Roman re-conquests of the sixth century, such as Belisarius in 540 and Germanus in 582.[145][146] References[edit] Citations[edit] ^ Christie 1991, p. 236. ^ Taagepera, p. 24. ^ "Salona". Ancient History Encyclopedia. Retrieved 9 August 2020. ^ "Spalatum (Split) - Livius". www.livius.org. Retrieved 9 August 2020. ^ "Julius Nepos | Roman emperor". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 9 August 2020. ^ Roman Governors. ^ a b Eck 2002, p. 15f. ^ Samarin 1968, pp. 662–663. ^ Weigel 1992, p. 88f. ^ Curchin 2004, p. 130. ^ Grant 1954, pp. 91–94. ^ Grant 1954, pp. 30–45. ^ Tenney 1930, p. 35. ^ Bowman, Cameron & Garnsey 2005, p. 1. ^ Aurelian. ^ Downey 1961, pp. 249–250. ^ Tucker 2010, p. 75. ^ Sasanian Dynasty. ^ Bowman, Cameron & Garnsey 2005, p. 38. ^ Bray 1997, p. 38. ^ Potter 2004, p. 322. ^ Bourne 2000, p. 14. ^ Postumus. ^ Smith 2013, p. 179. ^ Southern 2015, p. 176. ^ Vagi 2000, p. 386. ^ Barnes 2006, pp. 6–7. ^ Potter 2014, p. 282. ^ Southern 2007, pp. 141–142. ^ Cameron, Ward-Perkins & Whitby 2000, p. 42. ^ Barnes 2006, pp. 27–28. ^ Odahl, pp. 78–79. ^ Jones 1992, p. 59. ^ Lenski 2007, pp. 61–62. ^ Gibbons & Bury 1974, p. 14. ^ Grant 1997, pp. 47–48. ^ Limberis 2012, p. 9. ^ a b Odahl, p. 275. ^ a b Carr 2015, pp. 40–43. ^ a b Constantius. ^ Potter 2008, p. 195. ^ Dagron 1984, pp. 15 & 19. ^ Lascaratos & Voros, pp. 615–619. ^ Katz 1955, pp. 88–89. ^ a b Pontifex Maximus. ^ Kaylor & Phillips 2012, p. 14. ^ Bauer 2010, p. 68. ^ Vogt 1993, p. 179. ^ Frassetto 2003, pp. 214–217. ^ Burns 1994, p. 244. ^ Bury 2005, p. 110. ^ Deliyannis 2010, pp. 153–156. ^ Hallenbeck 1982, p. 7. ^ Gallienus. ^ Hugh 1996, pp. 148–149. ^ Bury 2005, p. 108. ^ Bury 2005, p. 109. ^ Bury 2005, p. 138. ^ Heather 2005, p. 195. ^ Bury 2005, p. 113. ^ Norwich 1989, p. 136. ^ Cline & Graham 2011, p. 303. ^ Bury 2005, p. 145. ^ Bury 2005, p. 146. ^ Bury 2005, p. 154. ^ Goldsworthy 2010, p. 305. ^ Hughes 2012, pp. 102–103. ^ a b Heather 2000, p. 11. ^ Heather 2000, p. 15. ^ Bury 2005, p. 292. ^ Heather 2007, p. 339. ^ a b Heather 2000, pp. 17–18. ^ Given 2014, p. 126. ^ Given 2014, p. 128. ^ Bury 2005, pp. 324–325. ^ Heather 2000, p. 379. ^ a b c Majorian. ^ a b c Anthemius. ^ Libius Severus. ^ Gordon 2013, p. 122f. ^ a b Glycerius. ^ a b c Bury 2005, p. 408. ^ MacGeorge 2002, p. 62. ^ a b c d Börm 2008, p. 47ff. ^ a b c Elton 1992, pp. 288–297. ^ a b Martindale 1980, p. 514. ^ a b Williams & Friell 1998, p. 187. ^ Nicol 2002, p. 9. ^ a b Bury 2015, p. 278. ^ Bury 1923, pp. 422–424. ^ Hunt et al. 2001, p. 256. ^ a b Kidner et al. 2008, pp. 198–203. ^ Heather 2005, p. 191. ^ Frassetto 2013, p. 203. ^ a b Goldberg 2006, p. 6. ^ Merills 2016, pp. 199–224. ^ Martindale 1980, p. 734. ^ Martindale 1980, pp. 509–510. ^ Bury 2005, p. 410. ^ Jones 1992, p. 254f. ^ Moorhead 1994, pp. 107–115. ^ Barnish 1992, pp. 35–37. ^ Bury 1923, p. 422. ^ Wolfram 1990, p. 283. ^ Bury 2005, pp. 422–424. ^ Bury 2005, p. 459. ^ Bury 2005, pp. 461–462. ^ Amory 1997, p. 8. ^ a b Norwich 1989, p. 215. ^ Haldon 1997, pp. 17–19. ^ Gunderson, pp. 43–68. ^ Luttwak 2009, p. 512. ^ Maas 2005, p. 118. ^ Merills 2016, pp. 11–12. ^ Bury 2005, pp. 125–132. ^ Bury 2005, pp. 139–140. ^ Treadgold 1997, p. 216. ^ Fouracre 2005, p. 165. ^ Thompson 1969, p. 325. ^ Noble 1984, p. 31. ^ Knowles & Obolensky 1978, pp. 108–109. ^ Fouracre 2005, pp. 256–258. ^ Fouracre 2005, pp. 275–276. ^ Collins 1989, p. 49. ^ Collins 1983, p. 238. ^ Thomas 2010, p. 21. ^ a b Klewitz, p. 33. ^ Ravegnani 2004, p. 203. ^ Norwich 1989, pp. 112–113. ^ Norwich 1989, p. 116. ^ Legal system. ^ Samarin 1968, p. 666. ^ Gottlieb 2006, p. 196. ^ Satow 2011, p. 59. ^ Bulliet et al. 2010, p. 192. ^ Le Goff 1994, p. 14 & 21. ^ Durant 1950, pp. 517–551. ^ Annuario Pontificio, p. 23. ^ Levillain 2002, p. 907. ^ Kaegi 2004, p. 196. ^ a b Croke 2001, p. 78. ^ Wienand 2014, p. 260. ^ Goldsworthy 2009, pp. 68–69. ^ Martindale 1980, pp. 1199–1200. ^ a b c Moorhead 1994, pp. 84–86. ^ a b c Whitby 1988, p. 7. ^ The Code of Justinian. ^ Herrin 1987, p. 156. ^ Whaley 2012, pp. 17–20. ^ Fouracre & Gerberding 1996, p. 345. ^ White 2007, p. 139. ^ Ball 2001, p. 449. ^ Watson 2014, pp. 536–540. ^ Tames 1972, p. 55. ^ Glazer 1996, pp. 54–56. ^ Potter 2008, pp. 260–261. ^ Potter 2008, p. 344. ^ Grant 1997, p. 209. ^ a b Grant 1997, p. 210. ^ Potter 2008, p. 342. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad Norwich 1989, p. 384. ^ Grant 1997, pp. 217–218. ^ Grant 1997, p. 223. ^ Grant 1997, p. 224. ^ Grant 1997, pp. 224–225. ^ Grant 1997, p. 226. ^ Grant 1997, pp. 235–236. ^ Odahl, pp. 79–80. ^ Grant 1997, pp. 240–242. ^ Grant 1997, pp. 247–248. ^ Grant 1997, pp. 242–246. ^ Grant 1997, pp. 251–254. ^ Norwich 1989, p. 29. ^ Norwich 1989, p. 30. ^ Norwich 1989, p. 31. ^ a b c Norwich 1989, p. 32. ^ Norwich 1989, p. 34. ^ a b c Adkins & Adkins 1998, p. 35. ^ Hebblewhite 2016, p. 20. ^ a b Errington 2006, pp. 36–37. ^ a b Birley 2005, p. 450. ^ Grant 1997, pp. 270–274. ^ Grant 1997, pp. 282–285. ^ Grant 1997, pp. 298–302. ^ a b Drinkwater & Elton 2002, p. 116. ^ Burns & Jensen 2014, p. 64. ^ Collins 2010, p. 88. ^ Grant 1997, pp. 310–312. ^ Grant 1997, pp. 315–317. ^ Grant 1997, pp. 317–319. ^ Grant 1997, pp. 319–321. ^ Grant 1997, pp. 322–323. ^ Norwich 1989, p. 171. ^ Bury 1923, p. 274. ^ a b Norwich 1989, p. 385. ^ Gibbons & Womersley 1994, p. 402. ^ Burns 1991, p. 74. Sources[edit] Adkins, Lesley; Adkins, Roy A. (1998). Handbook to Life in Ancient Rome. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780195123326. Amory, Patrick (1997). People and Identity in Ostrogothic Italy, 489–554. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780511523069. Annuario Pontificio. Libreria Editrice Vaticana. 2012. ISBN 978-88-209-8722-0. Ball, Warwick (2001). Rome in the East: The Transformation of an Empire. Routledge. ISBN 978-0415243575. Barnes, Timothy D. (2006). Constantine and Eusebius. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0674165311. Barnish, S.J.B. (1992). Cassiodorus: Variae, Translated with commentary by S. J. B. Barnish. Liverpool University Press. ISBN 9780853234364. Bauer, Susan Wise (2010). The History of the Medieval World: From the Conversion of Constantine to the First Crusade. W.W. Norton. ISBN 978-0393059755. Birley, Anthony R. (2005). The Roman Government of Britain. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199252374. Börm, Henning (2008). Monumentum et instrumentum inscriptum (in German). Franz Steiner. ISBN 9783515092395. Bourne, Richard John (2000). Aspects of the relationship between the central and Gallic empires in the mid to late third century ad with special reference to coinage studies. Durham theses, Durham University. ISBN 978-1841712505. Bowman, Alan K.; Cameron, Averil; Garnsey, Peter, eds. (2005). The Cambridge Ancient History, Volume XII: The Crisis of Empire, A.D. 193-337. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521301992. Bray, John (1997). Gallienus: A Study in Reformist and Sexual Politics. Wakefield Press. ISBN 978-1-86254-337-9. Bulliet, Richard; Crossley, Pamela; Headrick, Daniel; Hirsch, Steven; Johnson, Lyman (2010). The Earth and Its Peoples: A Global History, Volume 1. Cengage Learning. ISBN 978-1439084748. Burns, Thomas S. (1991). A History of the Ostrogoths. Indiana University Press. ISBN 978-0253206008. Burns, Thomas S. (1994). Barbarians Within the Gates of Rome: A Study of Roman Military Policy and the Barbarians. Indiana University Press. ISBN 978-0-253-31288-4. Burns, J. Patout; Jensen, Robin M. (2014). Christianity in Roman Africa: The Development of Its Practices and Beliefs. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. ISBN 9781467440370. Bury, John Bagnell (1923). History of the Later Roman Empire Vols. I & II. Macmillan & Co., Ltd. ASIN B00L5PD1PA. Bury, John Bagnell (2005). A History of the Later Roman Empire from Arcadius to Irene (395 A.D. to 800 A.D.). Adamant Media Corp. ISBN 978-1402183683. Bury, John Bagnell (2015). A History of the Later Roman Empire from Arcadius to Irene (395 A.D. to 800 A.D.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9781316219133. Cameron, Averil; Ward-Perkins, Bryan; Whitby, Michael, eds. (2000). The Cambridge Ancient History, Volume XIV: Late Antiquity: Empire and Successors, A.D. 425–600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521325912. Carr, John (2015). Fighting Emperors of Byzantium. Pen and Sword. ISBN 978-1783831166. Christie, N. (1991). "Milano — Capitale dell'impero romano, 286–402 d.c. (Mostra, Milano: Palazzo Reale, 24 Gennaio-22 Aprile 1990). Milan: Silvana Editoriale, 1990. Pp. 568, numerous b&w pls, figs maps, 40 colour pls". Journal of Roman Studies. 81: 236–237. doi:10.2307/300550. JSTOR 300550. Cline, Eric H.; Graham, Mark W. (2011). Ancient Empires: From Mesopotamia to the Rise of Islam. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521717809. Collins, Roger (1983). Early Medieval Spain. St. Martin's Press. ISBN 978-0-312-22464-6. Collins, Roger (1989). The Arab Conquest of Spain 710–797. Blackwell. ISBN 978-0-631-19405-7. Collins, Roger (2010). Early Medieval Europe, 300–1000. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 9781137014283. Croke, Brian (2001). Count Marcellinus and his Chronicle. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0198150015. Curchin, Leonard A. (2004). The Romanization of Central Spain: complexity, diversity, and change in a Provincial Hinterland. Routledge. ISBN 978-0415620079. Dagron, Gilbert (1984). Naissance d'une Capitale: Constantinople et ses institutions de 330 a 451. Presses Universitaires de France. ISBN 978-2-13-038902-6. Deliyannis, Deborah M. (2010). Ravenna in late antiquity. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-83672-2. Downey, Glanville (1961). History of Antioch in Syria: From Seleucus to the Arab Conquest. Literary Licensing LLC. OCLC 859619733. Drinkwater, John; Elton, Hugh (2002). Fifth-Century Gaul: A Crisis of Identity?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521529334. Durant, Will (1950). The Age of Faith: A History of Medieval Civilization – Christian, Islamic, and Judaic – from Constantine to Dante, A.D. 325–1300. Simon & Schuster. OCLC 769104576. Eck, Werner (2002). The Age of Augustus. Blackwell. ISBN 978-1405151498. Elton, Hugh (1992). Fifth-century Gaul: A Crisis of Identity?. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521414852. Elton, Hugh (1996). Warfare in Roman Europe, AD 350–425. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-815241-5. Errington, R. Malcolm (2006). Roman Imperial Policy from Julian to Theodosius. University of North Carolina Press. ISBN 9780807877456. Fouracre, Paul, ed. (2005). The New Cambridge Medieval History, Volume 1, c.500–c.700. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9781139053938. Fouracre, Paul; Gerberding, Richard A. (1996). Late Merovingian France: History and Hagiography, 640–720. Manchester University Press. ISBN 978-0-7190-4791-6. Frassetto, Michael (2003). Encyclopedia of Barbarian Europe: Society in Transformation. ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-1-57607-263-9. Frassetto, Michael (2013). The Early Medieval World: From the Fall of Rome to the Time of Charlemagne. ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-1-59884-995-0. Gibbons, Edward; Bury, J.B. (1974). The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. AMS Press. ISBN 978-0404028206. Gibbons, Edward; Womersley, David P. (1994). The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, Vol 3. Penguin Books. ISBN 978-0140437645. Given, John (2014). The Fragmentary History of Priscus: Attila, the Huns and the Roman Empire, AD 430–476 (Christian Roman Empire). Arx Publishing. ISBN 978-1935228141. Glazer, Steven A. (1996) [Research completed January 1995]. Metz, Helen Chapin (ed.). A Country Study: Turkey. Country Studies (5th ed.). Federal Research Division of the Library of Congress. ISBN 978-0-8444-0864-4. OCLC 33898522. Retrieved 22 April 2009. Goldberg, Eric J. (2006). Struggle for Empire: Kingship and Conflict Under Louis the German, 817–876. Cornell University Press. ISBN 978-0801475290. Goldsworthy, Adrian (2009). How Rome Fell: death of a superpower. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-16426-8. Goldsworthy, Adrian (2010). The Fall of the West: The Slow Death of the Roman Superpower. Orion Books Ltd. ISBN 978-0753826928. Gordon, C.D. (2013). The Age of Attila: Fifth-Century Byzantium and the Barbarians. University of Michigan Press. ISBN 978-0472035786. Gottlieb, H. (2006). Linguistic Influence. Elsevier. ISBN 978-0-08-044299-0. Grant, Michael (1954). Roman Literature. Cambridge England: University Press. ASIN B0000CMLNV. Grant, Michael (1997). The Fall of the Roman Empire. Simon & Schuster. ISBN 978-0684829562. Gunderson, Gerald (1976). "Economic change and the demise of the Roman Empire". Explorations in Economic History. 13 (1): 43–68. doi:10.1016/0014-4983(76)90004-8. Haldon, J.F. (1997). Byzantium in the Seventh Century: The Transformation of a Culture. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521319171. Hallenbeck, Jan T. (1982). Pavia and Rome: The Lombard monarchy and the papacy in the eighth century. American Philosophical Society. ISBN 978-0871697240. Heather, Peter (2000). The Western Empire, 425–76. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9781139054416. Heather, Peter (2005). The Fall of the Roman Empire: A New History. Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-333-98914-2. Heather, Peter (2007). The Fall of the Roman Empire: A New History of Rome and the Barbarians. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0195325416. Hebblewhite, Mark (2016). The Emperor and the Army in the Later Roman Empire, AD 235–395. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 9781317034308. Herrin, Judith (1987). The Formation of Christendom. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0691008318. Hughes, Ian (2012). Aetius: Attila's Nemesis. Pen and Sword. ISBN 978-1848842793. Hunt, Lynn; Martin, Thomas R.; Rosenwein, Barbara H.; Hsia, R. Po-chia; Smith, Bonnie G. (2001). The Making of the West: Peoples and Cultures. Bedford. ISBN 9780312183653. Jones, A. H. M. (1992). The Later Roman Empire. University of Oklahoma Press. ISBN 978-0801832857. Kaegi, Walter E. (2004). Heraclius: Emperor of Byzantium. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-81459-1. Katz, Solomon (1955). The Decline of Rome and the Rise of Mediaeval Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. ASIN B002S62FYI. Kaylor, Noel Harold; Phillips, Philip Edward (2012). A Companion to Boethius in the Middle Ages. Brill. ISBN 9789004183544. Kidner, Frank L.; Bucur, Maria; Mathisen, Ralph; McKee, Sally; Theodore, R. (2008). Making Europe: People, Politics, and Culture. Houghton Mifflin. ISBN 978-0618004799. Klewitz, Hans-Walter (1 January 1943). "Eduard Eichmann, Die Kaiserkrönung im Abendland. Ein Beitrag zur, Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des kirchlichen Rechts, der Liturgie und der Kirchenpolitik". Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Kanonistische Abteilung. 32 (1): 509–525. doi:10.7767/zrgka.1943.32.1.509. S2CID 183386465. Archived from the original on 22 February 2018. Retrieved 21 February 2018. Knowles, David; Obolensky, Dimitri (1978). The Middle Ages: The Middle Ages. Paulist Press. ISBN 978-0809102761. Lascaratos, J.; Voros, D. (May 2000). "Fatal Wounding of the Byzantine Emperor Julian the Apostate (361–363 A.D.): Approach To The Contribution of Ancient Surgery". World Journal of Surgery. 24 (5): 615–9. doi:10.1007/s002689910100. PMID 10787086. S2CID 6654496. Le Goff, Jacques (1994). Medieval Civilization: 400–1500. B. Blackwell. ISBN 978-0-631-17566-7. Lenski, Noel (2007). The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Constantine. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9781139000840. Levillain, Philippe (2002). The Papacy: An Encyclopedia. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-92230-2. Limberis, Vasiliki (2012). Divine Heiress The Virgin Mary and the Making of Christian Constantinople. Routledge. ISBN 978-0415642965. Luttwak, Edward N. (2009). The Grand Strategy of the Byzantine Empire. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-03519-5. Maas, Micael (2005). The Cambridge Companion Guide to the Age of Justinian. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521520713. MacGeorge, Penny (2002). Late Roman warlords. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-925244-2. Martindale, John R., ed. (1980). The Prosopography of the Later Roman Empire: Volume II, AD 395–527. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-20159-4. Merills, Andrew (2016). Vandals, Romans and Berbers: New Perspectives on Late Antique North Africa. Routledge. ISBN 978-1138252684. Moorhead, John (1994). Justinian. Longman. ISBN 9780582063037. Nicol, Donald M. (2002). The Immortal Emperor: The Life and Legend of Constantine Palaiologos, Last Emperor of the Romans. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521894098. Noble, Thomas F. X. (1984). The Republic of St. Peter: The Birth of the Papal State, 680–825. University of Pennsylvania Press. ISBN 978-0-8122-1239-6. Norwich, John Julius (1989). Byzantium: The Early Centuries. Knopf. ISBN 978-0394537788. Odahl, Charles M. (2006). "Constantine and the Christian Empire: Roman Imperial Biographies". Byzantinische Zeitschrift. 99 (1). doi:10.1515/BYZS.2006.260. S2CID 191436869. Archived from the original on 22 February 2018. Retrieved 15 February 2018. Potter, David (2004). The Roman Empire at Bay AD 180–395. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-10058-8. Potter, David (2008). The Emperors of Rome: The Story of Imperial Rome from Julius Caesar to the Last Emperor. Quercus. ISBN 978-1780877501. Potter, David (2014). Ancient Rome: A New History. W. W. Norton. ISBN 978-0500291245. Ravegnani, Giorgio (2004). I bizantini in Italia (in Italian). Mulino. ISBN 978-8815096906. Samarin, William J. (1968). "Lingua Francas of the World". Readings in the Sociology of Language. De Gruyter. pp. 660–672. doi:10.1515/9783110805376.660. hdl:1807/67629. ISBN 9783110805376. Satow, Ernest (2011). A Guide to Diplomatic Practice. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9781108028868. Smith, Andrew M. (2013). Roman Palmyra: Identity, Community, and State Formation. OUP USA. ISBN 978-0199861101. Southern, Pat (2007). The Roman Army: a Social and Institutional History. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0195328783. Southern, Patricia (2015). The Roman Empire from Severus to Constantine. Routledge. ISBN 9781317496946. Taagepera, Rein (1979). "Size and Duration of Empires: Growth-Decline Curves, 600 B.C. to 600 A.D". Social Science History. 3 (3/4): 115–138. doi:10.2307/1170959. JSTOR 1170959. Tames, Richard (1972). Last of the Tsars. Pan Books Ltd. ISBN 9780330029025. Tenney, Frank (1930). "Life and Literature in the Roman Republic". Classical Philology. 28: 60–61. doi:10.1086/361560. OCLC 321827. Thomas, Hugh (2010). Rivers of Gold: The Rise of the Spanish Empire. Penguin Books. ISBN 978-0141034485. Thompson, E. A. (1969). The Goths in Spain. Clarendon. OCLC 186003872. Treadgold, Warren (1997). A History of the Byzantine State and Society. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. ISBN 0-8047-2630-2. Tucker, Spencer (2010). Battles That Changed History: An Encyclopedia of World Conflict. ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-1598844290. Retrieved 16 January 2015. Vagi, David L. (2000). Coinage and History of the Roman Empire, c. 82 B.C.- A.D. 480. Fitzroy Dearborn. ISBN 9781579583163. Vogt, Joseph (1993). The Decline of Rome: The Metamorphosis of Ancient Civilization. Weidenfeld. ISBN 978-0297813927. Watson, Alexander (2014). Ring of Steel: Germany and Austria-Hungary in World War I. Basic Books. ISBN 978-0465018727. Weigel, Richard D. (1992). Lepidus: The Tarnished Triumvir. Routledge. ISBN 978-0415076807. Whaley, Joachim (2012). Joachim Whaley, Germany and the Holy Roman Empire: Volume I: Maximilian I to the Peace of Westphalia, 1493–1648. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0199688821. Whitby, Michael (1988). The Emperor Maurice and his historian : Theophylact Simocatta on Persian and Balkan warfare. Clarendon Press. ISBN 978-0-19-822945-2. White, Craig (2007). The Great German Nation: Origins and Destiny. AuthorHouse. ISBN 978-1434325495. Wienand, Johannes (2014). Contested Monarchy: Integrating the Roman Empire in the Fourth Century AD. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0199768998. Williams, Stephen; Friell, Gerard (1998). The Rome That Did Not Fall the Phoenix in the East. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-203-98231-0. Wolfram, Herwig (1990). History of the Goths. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0520069831. Web sources[edit] Donald L., Wasson. "Gallienus - Ancient History Encyclopedia". www.ancient.eu. Archived from the original on 18 May 2017. Retrieved 8 December 2018. Ralph W., Mathisen. "Anthemius – De Imperatoribus Romanis". www.roman-emperors.org. Archived from the original on 30 July 2017. Retrieved 23 February 2018. Ralph W., Mathisen. "Glycerius – De Imperatoribus Romanis". www.roman-emperors.org. Archived from the original on 3 September 2017. Retrieved 23 February 2018. Ralph W., Mathisen. "Libius Severus – De Imperatoribus Romanis". www.roman-emperors.org. Archived from the original on 27 April 2018. Retrieved 8 December 2018. Ralph W., Mathisen. "Majorian – De Imperatoribus Romanis". www.roman-emperors.org. Archived from the original on 22 August 2017. Retrieved 23 February 2018. Michael, DiMaio. "Constantius II – De Imperatoribus Romanis". www.roman-emperors.org. Archived from the original on 11 September 2017. Retrieved 23 February 2018. Körner, Christian. "Aurelian – De Imperatoribus Romanis". www.roman-emperors.org. Archived from the original on 9 July 2017. Retrieved 23 February 2018. "Legal System – The World Factbook, Central Intelligence Agency". www.cia.gov. Archived from the original on 1 December 2017. Retrieved 24 February 2018. Lendering, Jona. "Governor (Roman) – Livius". www.livius.org. Archived from the original on 22 February 2018. Retrieved 15 February 2018. Lendering, Jona. "Pontifex Maximus – Livius". www.livius.org. Archived from the original on 22 February 2018. Retrieved 21 February 2018. Polfer, Michael. "Postumus – De Imperatoribus Romanis". www.roman-emperors.org. Archived from the original on 5 August 2017. Retrieved 23 February 2018. Scott, Samuel P. "The Code of Justinian – Book 1". droitromain.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr. Archived from the original on 25 February 2018. Retrieved 25 February 2018. Shapur Shahbazi, A. "Sasanian Dynasty – Encyclopedia Iranica". www.iranicaonline.org. Archived from the original on 17 November 2017. Retrieved 23 February 2018. Further reading[edit] Börm, Henning (2018). Westrom: Von Honorius bis Justinian. Kohlhammer. ISBN 978-3-17-033216-4. Heather, Peter (2003). The Visigoths from the Migration Period to the Seventh Century: An Ethnographic Perspective. Boydell & Brewer Ltd. ISBN 978-1843830337. Kolb, Frank (1987). Diocletian und die Erste Tetrarchie : Improvisation oder Experiment in der Organisation monarchischer Herrschaft?. Walter de Gruyter. ISBN 978-3-11-010934-4. Merills, Andy; Miles, Richard (2007). The Vandals. Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 978-1405160681. External links[edit] Library resources about Western Roman Empire Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries Wikimedia Commons has media related to Western Roman Empire. De Imperatoribus Romanis. Scholarly biographies of many Roman emperors, including those of the Western Roman Empire. Digital Map of the Roman Empire. Navigable and interactive map of the Roman Empire. The Fall of Rome Podcast. Podcast concerning the Fall of the Western Roman Empire by PhD historian Patrick Wyman. v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films v t e List of historic states of Italy Etruscan civilization Lega dei popoli Etruscan dodecapolis Ancient Rome Roman Kingdom (753 BC–509 BC) Roman Republic (509 BC–27 BC) Italy (4th/3rd century BC–476 AD) Sicilia (241 BC–476 AD) Corsica and Sardinia (238 BC–455 AD) Roman Empire (27 BC–395 AD) Western Roman Empire (285 AD–476 AD) Praetorian prefecture of Italy (337 AD–584 AD) Medieval and Early Modern states Early Italian Kingdom (476–774) Odoacer's rule (476–493) Ostrogothic rule (493–553) Vandal rule (435–534) Lombard rule (568–774) Duchy of Benevento Duchy of Friuli Duchy of Ivrea Duchy of Spoleto Duchy of Tridentum Byzantine Empire (584–751) Exarchate of Ravenna (584–751) Duchy of Rome (533–751) Duchy of Perugia (554–752) Duchy of the Pentapolis (554–752) Exarchate of Africa (585–698) Holy Roman Empire and other independent states Bishopric of Bressanone City of Fiume and its District Commune of Rome County of Gorizia Princely County of Gorizia and Gradisca County of Guastalla Duchy of Guastalla Kingdom of Italy Ancona Ceva Finale March of Friuli Patria del Friuli (Patriarchate of Aquileia) Ivrea Istria Mantua Milan March of Montferrat Duchy of Montferrat Tyrol Trieste Turin Tuscany Verona Duchy of Ivrea Duchy of Mantua Duchy of Massa and Carrara Duchy of Merania Duchy of Mirandola Duchy of Modena and Reggio Principality of Piombino Duchy of Reggio Marquisate of Saluzzo Duchy of Spoleto Bishopric of Tarantasia Bishopric of Trento Grand Duchy of Tuscany Papal States (754–1870) Duchy of Castro Duchy of Ferrara Holy See Duchy of Parma Duchy of Urbino Republics Republic of Cospaia Republic of Ancona Republic of Florence Republic of Genoa Republic of Noli Republic of Lucca Republic of Massa Republic of Pisa Republic of Siena Republic of Venice (697–1797) Dogado Domini di Terraferma Stato da Màr Southern Italy (774–1139) Byzantine Duchy of Amalfi Duchy of Gaeta Catepanate of Italy Longobardia Theme of Lucania Duchy of Naples Theme of Sicily and Byzantine Sicily Duchy of Sorrento Arab Emirate of Bari Emirate of Sicily Lombard Principality of Benevento Principality of Salerno Principality of Capua Norman County of Apulia and Calabria County of Aversa County of Sicily Principality of Taranto Sardinia and Corsica (9th century–1420) Judicates Agugliastra Arborea Cagliari Gallura Logudoro Oristano Republic of Sassari Kingdom of Sardinia and Corsica Corsican Republic (1755–1769) Kingdom of Sicily (1130–1816) and Kingdom of Naples (1282–1816) State of the Presidi Duke of San Donato Duchy of Sora Principality of Taranto Terra Sancti Benedicti Neapolitan Republic (1647–1648) Hospitaller Malta Gozo Malta Protectorate Crown Colony of Malta Savoy and the Savoyard state (from the 10th century) Savoy County of Savoy County of Maurienne County of Geneva Duchy of Chablais Barony of Faucigny Piedmont Duchy of Aosta County of Nice County of Tenda Sicily (1713–1720) Sardinia (1720–1861) French Revolutionary and Napoleonic eras (1792–1815) Republics Cisalpinia Cispadania Italy Liguria Lucca Parthenopea Piedmont Rome Subalpinia Transpadania Monarchies Benevento Etruria Guastalla Italy Lucca and Piombino Massa and Carrara Naples Pontecorvo Tuscany Elba Corsica Post-Napoleonic states Duchy of Genoa (1815–1848) Duchy of Lucca (1815–1847) Duchy of Massa and Carrara (1814–1829) Duchy of Modena and Reggio (1814–1859) Duchy of Parma (1814–1859) Grand Duchy of Tuscany (1815–1859) Italian United Provinces (1831) Provisional Government of Milan (1848) Republic of San Marco (1848–1849) Roman Republic (1849) United Provinces of Central Italy (1859–1860) Kingdom of Sardinia (1814–1860) Kingdom of the Two Sicilies (1816–1861) Kingdom of Lombardy–Venetia (1815–1866) Papal States (1814–1870) Post-unification Kingdom of Italy (1861–1946) Julian March Italian Empire (1882–1960) Free State of Fiume (1920–1924) Italian Social Republic (1943–1945) Free Territory of Trieste (1947–1954) v t e Empires Ancient (Colonies) Akkadian Neo-Sumerian Old Babylonian Egyptian Old Kingdom Middle Kingdom New Kingdom Assyrian Neo-Babylonian Phoenician Carthaginian Chinese Shang Qin Han Three Kingdoms Jin North and South Hellenistic Macedonian Seleucid Hittite Indian Nanda Maurya Satavahana Shunga Gupta Harsha Iranian Median Achaemenid Parthian Sasanian Kushan Mongol Xianbei Roman Western Eastern Teotihuacan Post-classical Aksum Arab Rashidun Umayyad Abbasid Fatimid Córdoba Aragonese Angevin Aztec Benin Bornu Bruneian Bulgarian First Second Byzantine Nicaea Thessalonica Trebizond Calakmul Castilian Chinese Sui Tang Liao Song Jīn Yuan Uyghur Khaganate Ethiopian Zagwe Solomonic Genoese Georgian Holy-Roman Carolingian Huetar Hunnic Hephthalite Inca Indian Chola Gurjara-Pratihara Pala Eastern Ganga dynasty Delhi Vijayanagara Iranian Samanid Saffarid Kanem Khmer Latin Majapahit Malaccan Mali Mongol Yuan Golden Horde Chagatai Khanate Ilkhanate Moroccan Idrisid Almoravid Almohad Marinid North Sea Oyo Serbian Singhasari Somali Ajuran Ifatite Adalite Mogadishan Songhai Srivijaya Tibetan Tikal Timurid Tiwanku Toltec Turko-Persian Ghaznavid Great Seljuk Khwarezmian Venetian Vietnamese Dai Viet Wagadou Wari Modern Afghan Ashanti Austrian Austro-Hungarian Brazilian Central African Chinese Ming Qing China Manchukuo Ethiopian Haitian First Second French First Second German First/Old Reich Second Reich Third Reich Indian Mughal Mysorean Sikh Maratha British Raj Iranian Safavid Afsharid Qajar Pahlavi Japanese Johor Korean Mexican First Second Moroccan Saadi Alaouite Russian Somali Gobroon Majeerteen Hobyo Swedish Tongan Ottoman Vietnamese Dainam Vietnam Colonial American Belgian British English Scottish Danish Dutch French German Italian Japanese Omani Polish–Lithuanian Couronian Portuguese Sovereign Military Order of Malta Spanish Swedish Lists Empires largest in India Ancient great powers Medieval great powers Modern great powers European colonialism African empires Miscellaneous The empire on which the sun never sets "Empire" as a description of foreign policy American empire Soviet Empire v t e Western world and culture Aspects Canon Esotericism Law Literature Media Music Painting Modern/Contemporary Painting Philosophy Religion History Classical antiquity Late Antiquity Middle Ages (Early Middle Ages High Middle Ages Late Middle Ages) Christendom Renaissance Reformation Age of Enlightenment Early modern period Great Divergence Modernism Westernization World Wars Cold War War on Terror Authority control GND: 4107101-3 LCCN: sh85115160 VIAF: 262852029 WorldCat Identities: viaf-262852029 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Western_Roman_Empire&oldid=991309866" Categories: Western Roman Empire Former countries in Europe Former countries in Africa Former countries on the Italian Peninsula Former empires in Europe Former empires in Africa 3rd century in the Roman Empire 4th century in the Roman Empire 5th century in the Roman Empire 286 establishments 280s establishments in the Roman Empire 470s disestablishments in the Roman Empire States and territories established in the 390s States and territories disestablished in the 5th century 3rd century 4th century 5th century Hidden categories: Articles with short description Short description matches Wikidata Good articles Articles containing Latin-language text Pages using infobox country or infobox former country with the flag caption or type parameters Pages using infobox country or infobox former country with the symbol caption or type parameters All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from June 2019 CS1 German-language sources (de) CS1 Italian-language sources (it) Commons category link is on Wikidata Use dmy dates from May 2020 Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Languages Afrikaans Alemannisch العربية Aragonés Asturianu Azərbaycanca تۆرکجه Bân-lâm-gú Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ Български Bosanski Brezhoneg Català Cebuano Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français Frysk Galego 한국어 Հայերեն हिन्दी Hrvatski Bahasa Indonesia Interlingua Íslenska Italiano עברית Jawa ქართული Kiswahili Kurdî Latina Latviešu Lietuvių Lingua Franca Nova Lumbaart Magyar Македонски მარგალური مصرى Bahasa Melayu Nederlands नेपाल भाषा 日本語 Nordfriisk Norsk bokmål Norsk nynorsk Occitan ਪੰਜਾਬੀ پنجابی Picard Plattdüütsch Polski Português Română Русский Sardu Scots Simple English Slovenčina Slovenščina کوردی Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Tagalog தமிழ் ไทย Türkçe Українська اردو Tiếng Việt West-Vlams Winaray 吴语 Yorùbá 粵語 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 29 November 2020, at 11:32 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2679 ---- Priscus - Wikipedia Priscus From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search For other uses, see Priscus (disambiguation). Priscus (left) with the Roman embassy at the court of Attila the Hun, holding his ΙΣΤΟΡΙΑ (History, which the painter has incorrectly spelled ΙΣΤΩΡΙΑ). (Detail from Mór Than's Feast of Attila.) Priscus of Panium (/ˈprɪskəs/; Greek: Πρίσκος) was a 5th-century Eastern Roman diplomat and Greek historian and rhetorician (or sophist).[1][2][3][4] Contents 1 Biography 1.1 History of Byzantium 1.2 Priscus account of a dinner with Attila the Hun 1.3 Priscus in fiction 2 Remaining works 3 References 3.1 Citations 3.2 Sources 4 Further reading 5 External links Biography[edit] Priscus was born in Panion (located in Thrace) between 410-420 AD.[1][2] In 448/449 AD, he accompanied Maximinus, the head of the Byzantine embassy representing Emperor Theodosius the Younger (r. 408–450), on a diplomatic mission to the court of Attila the Hun.[1][2][4] While there, he met and conversed with a Greek merchant, dressed in "Scythian" (or Hunnic) fashion, who was captured eight years earlier (circa 441–442) when the city of Viminacium (located on the Danube east of modern-day Belgrade) was sacked by the Huns.[5][6] The trader explained to Priscus that after the sack of Viminacium, he was a slave of Onegesius, a Hunnic nobleman, but obtained his freedom and chose to settle among the Huns.[6][7] Priscus ultimately engaged in a debate with the Greek defector regarding the qualities of life and justice in both the Byzantine Empire and in barbarian kingdoms.[1] After an interlude in Rome, Priscus traveled to Alexandria and the Thebaid in Egypt.[1][2] He last appeared in the East, circa 456, attached to the staff of Euphemios as Emperor Marcian's (r. 450–457) magister officiorum.[1] He died after 472 AD.[1] History of Byzantium[edit] Priscus was the author of an eight-volume historical work, written in Greek, entitled the History of Byzantium (Greek: Ἱστορία Βυζαντιακή), which was probably not the original title name.[1][2] The History probably covered the period from the accession of Attila the Hun to the accession of Emperor Zeno (r. 474–475), or from 433 up until 474 AD.[2] Priscus's work currently survives in fragments and was very influential in the Byzantine Empire.[1] The History was used in the Excerpta de Legationibus of Emperor Constantine VII Porphyrogenitus (r. 913–959), as well as by authors such as Evagrius Scholasticus, Cassiodorus, Jordanes, and the author of the Souda.[1] Priscus's writing style is straightforward and his work is regarded as a reliable contemporary account of Attila the Hun, his court, and the reception of the Roman ambassadors.[2] He is considered a "classicizing" historian to the extent that his work, though written during the Christian era, is almost completely secular and relies on a style and word-choice that are part of an historiographical tradition dating back to the fifth century BC.[8] Priscus account of a dinner with Attila the Hun[edit] Priscus recounted the story of a dinner with Attila the Hun which took place at one of Attila's many houses. This house was said to be greater than the rest (having been made for celebration) due to it being constructed of decorative polished wood, with little thought to making any part of the place for defense. The dinner was at three o’clock; Priscus entered the house bearing gifts to Attila's wife; her name was Kreka and she had three sons. Priscus and the embassy of Eastern Romans were placed at the end of the table farthest from Attila but still in his presence; this was meant to show that he was greater than the Roman guests, and that Attila considered his people to be more important than Priscus and the Roman embassy. As Priscus and the Eastern Roman embassy stood, they followed the cultural tradition of being served tea from the cupbearers; they were to pray and have a drink before having a seat at the table. The seats were arranged parallel to the walls; Attila sat on the middle couch. The right side of Attila was reserved for his honored Chiefs, and everyone else including Priscus and the Roman embassies sat on the left. After being seated, everyone raised a glass to pledge one another with wine. Once the cupbearers left another attendant came in with a platter of meat, followed by bread and other foods of the time. All of the food was served onto plates of silver and gold. Priscus also notes that Attila didn’t use any silver or gold plates but instead used a cup made of wood; also, his attire was not very grand. Once the first round was finished, they stood and drank again to the health of Attila. When evening arrived torches were lit and songs that were about Attila's victories were sung.[7][9][10] Priscus in fiction[edit] Priscus is an important character in Slave of the Huns by Geza Gardonyi. He is depicted as a kindly master and scholar, and part of the novel is based on his account of his visit to Attila. Remaining works[edit] The remaining works of Priscus are currently published in four collections: Given, John (2014). The Fragmentary History of Priscus. Merchantville, New Jersey: Evolution Publishing. ISBN 978-1-935228-14-1. Blockley, Roger C. (2009). The Fragmentary Classicising Historians of the Later Roman Empire. II. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Francis Cairns. ISBN 978-0-905205-51-9. Gordon, Colin Douglas (1966). The Age of Attila: Fifth-century Byzantium and the Barbarians. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press. Dindorfius, Ludovicus (1870). Historici Graeci Minores (Volume 1). Leipzig, Germany: B. G. Teubneri. References[edit] Citations[edit] ^ a b c d e f g h i j Kazhdan 1991, "Priskos", p. 1721. ^ a b c d e f g Chisholm 1911, p. 361. ^ Toynbee & Myers 1948, p. 14: "The renegade Greek business man from Viminacium whom the Greek historian and Roman diplomatist Priscus encountered in Attila's ordu on the Alföld in A.D. 449 has already come to our notice." ^ a b Christophilopoulou 1986, p. 209: "For information about Attila, his court and the organization of life generally in his realm we have the authentic and reliable evidence of contemporary Greek historian Priscus, who accompanied Maximinus, the head of the Byzantine embassy, in 448." ^ Halsall 1996; Kelly 2004, p. 176; Toynbee & Myers 1948, p. 14. ^ a b Jones 1964, p. 866: "Priscus of Panium met one of these in Attila's camp. He was, he said, a Greek who had settled at Viminacium on the Danube and prospered in trade and married a rich wife. He was wealthy enough to be allotted as a special prize to Onegesius, one of the Hunnic nobles, when the town was captured." ^ a b Halsall 1996. ^ Given 2014, p. xvii. ^ Robinson 1905. ^ Ase Berit, Rolf Strandskogen (2 December 2016). Lifelines in World History. Routledge. ISBN 9781317466031. Sources[edit] Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Priscus" . Encyclopædia Britannica. 22 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 361.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link) Christophilopoulou, Aikaterinē (1986). Byzantine History (Volume 1). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Adolf M. Hakkert. ISBN 90-256-0836-1. Given, John (2014). The Fragmentary History of Priscus. Merchantville, New Jersey: Evolution Publishing. ISBN 978-1-935228-14-1. Halsall, Paul (March 1996). "Priscus at the Court of Attila". Retrieved 4 December 2011 – via Fordham University, Internet Medieval Source Book. Jones, Arnold Hugh Martin (1964). The Later Roman Empire, 284-602 (Volume Two). Norman, Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press. ISBN 0-8018-3354-X. Kazhdan, Alexander Petrovich, ed. (1991). The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium. New York, New York and Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-504652-6. Kelly, Christopher (2004). Ruling the Later Roman Empire. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. ISBN 0-674-01564-9. Robinson, J. H. (1905). "Priscus describes the court of Attila king of the Huns (448)". Readings in European History. Boston: Ginn. pp. 46–49. Retrieved 2 December 2016 – via Fordham University, Internet Medieval Source Book. Toynbee, Arnold Joseph; Myers, Edward DeLos (1948). A Study of History (Volume 8). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. Further reading[edit] Gordon, Colin Douglas (1964). "Fifth Century Chronology of in the Fragments of Priscus". New Review. IV (2–3). Thompson, E. A. (July–October 1945). "Priscus of Panium, Fragment I b". The Classical Quarterly. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. 39 (3/4): 92–94. doi:10.1017/s0009838800022643. JSTOR 637017. External links[edit] Media related to Priscus at Wikimedia Commons Georgetown University: "Priscus at the Court of Attila" (Translation by J. B. Bury) v t e Byzantine historians 5th century Annianus of Alexandria Eunapius John Rufus Malchus Olympiodorus of Thebes Panodorus of Alexandria Philostorgius Priscus Sabinus of Heraclea Socrates of Constantinople Sozomen Theodoret 6th century Agathias Cyril of Scythopolis Eustathius of Epiphania Evagrius Scholasticus Hesychius of Miletus John Diakrinomenos John of Ephesus John of Epiphania Pseudo-Joshua the Stylite Jordanes John Malalas Liberatus of Carthage Marcellinus Comes Menander Protector Nonnosus Peter the Patrician Procopius Theodorus Lector Theophanes of Byzantium Zacharias Rhetor Zosimus 7th century Chronicon Paschale John of Antioch Trajan the Patrician Theophylact Simocatta 8th century Hippolytus of Thebes 9th century Theophanes the Confessor George Syncellus Nikephoros I of Constantinople George Hamartolos Scriptor Incertus 10th century Chronicle of Monemvasia Constantine VII Joseph Genesius John Kaminiates Leo the Deacon Pseudo-Simeon Symeon the Metaphrast Theophanes Continuatus 11th century Michael Attaleiates George Kedrenos Michael Psellos John Skylitzes John Xiphilinus Yahya of Antioch 12th century Nikephoros Bryennios the Younger Niketas Choniates Eustathius of Thessalonica Michael Glykas Anna Komnene John Kinnamos Constantine Manasses Joannes Zonaras 13th century George Akropolites Theodore Skoutariotes 14th century Nicephorus Gregoras Nikephoros Kallistos Xanthopoulos John VI Kantakouzenos George Kodinos George Pachymeres Michael Panaretos 15th century John Anagnostes John Cananus Laonikos Chalkokondyles Michael Critobulus Doukas George Sphrantzes Authority control BIBSYS: 10016039 BNF: cb11985590w (data) GND: 100537723 ISNI: 0000 0003 7511 4507 LCCN: n84080832 NKC: jo2007376790 NLI: 000107899 NTA: 07004886X RERO: 02-A003712604 SELIBR: 315893 SUDOC: 027916138 VcBA: 495/183162 VIAF: 214797458 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n84080832 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Priscus&oldid=995189893" Categories: Byzantine historians 5th-century historians 5th-century Byzantine people Byzantine diplomats 5th-century Byzantine writers Hidden categories: Use dmy dates from April 2013 CS1 maint: ref=harv Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica with Wikisource reference Commons category link from Wikidata Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLI identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with RERO identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Languages Беларуская Български Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Ελληνικά Español فارسی Français Galego Հայերեն Bahasa Indonesia Italiano ქართული Қазақша Latina Magyar Nederlands Norsk bokmål Polski Português Русский Shqip Slovenčina Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Svenska ไทย Türkçe Українська Tiếng Việt 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 19 December 2020, at 18:44 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2696 ---- Nihilism - Wikipedia Nihilism From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Philosophy antithetical to concepts of meaningfulness This article is about the philosophical viewpoint. For other uses, see Nihilism (disambiguation). "Nihilist" redirects here. For other uses, see Nihilist (disambiguation). Part of a series on Nihilism The Nihilist by Paul Merwart Origins Fichteanism Nominalism Reductionism Russian nihilism Skepticism Concepts Amorality Anomie Après moi, le déluge God is dead Last man Meaninglessness Nonexistence Nothingness Paradox of nihilism Valuelessness Theories Philosophical nihilism Epistemological Existential Mereological Metaphysical Moral Ontological Other theories Legal National Political Scientific Therapeutic Theoreticians Russian nihilists Mikhail Bakunin Nikolay Chernyshevsky Nikolay Dobrolyubov Sofya Kovalevskaya Sergey Nechayev Dmitry Pisarev Varfolomey Zaytsev Other theoreticians Nihilists Non-nihilists Theodor Adorno Jean Baudrillard Buddha Albert Camus Emil Cioran Gilles Deleuze Fyodor Dostoevsky Gorgias Hegesias of Cyrene Martin Heidegger Friedrich Jacobi Søren Kierkegaard Philipp Mainländer Friedrich Nietzsche Keiji Nishitani Seraphim Rose Jean-Paul Sartre Oswald Spengler Max Stirner Leo Strauss Helmut Thielicke Jun Tsuji Ivan Turgenev Related topics Absurdism Anarchism Antifoundationalism Antinatalism Antinihilistic novel Atheism Egoism Existentialism Misanthropy Nietzschean affirmation Pessimism Philosophy of suicide Postmodernity Solipsism  Philosophy portal  Religion portal v t e Part of a series on Philosophy Plato Kant Nietzsche Buddha Confucius Averroes Branches Aesthetics Epistemology Ethics Legal philosophy Logic Metaphysics Philosophy of language Philosophy of mind Philosophy of science Political philosophy Social philosophy Periods Ancient Pre-Socratic Hellenistic Medieval Modern Early modern Late modern Contemporary Traditions Analytic Neopositivism Ordinary language Continental Existentialism Phenomenology Pragmatism Skepticism Traditions by region African Eastern Chinese Indian Middle-Eastern Egyptian Iranian Western Traditions by school Aristotelian Augustinian Averroist Avicennist Hegelian Kantian Occamist Platonist Neoplatonist Scotist Thomist Traditions by religion Buddhist Christian Humanist Hindu Jain Jewish Judeo-Islamic Islamic Early Islamic Illuminationist Sufi Literature Aesthetics Epistemology Ethics Logic Metaphysics Political philosophy Philosophers Aestheticians Epistemologists Ethicists Logicians Metaphysicians Social and political philosophers Lists Index Outline Years Problems Publications Theories Glossary Philosophers Miscellaneous Philosopher Wisdom Women in philosophy  Philosophy portal v t e Nihilism (/ˈnaɪ(h)ɪlɪzəm, ˈniː-/; from Latin nihil 'nothing') is a philosophy, or family of views within philosophy, expressing some form of negation towards life[1][2] or towards fundamental concepts such as knowledge, existence, and the meaning of life.[3] Different nihilist positions hold variously that human values are baseless, that life is meaningless, that knowledge is impossible, or that some set of entities does not exist.[4][5] The study of nihilism may regard it as merely a label that has been applied to various separate philosophies,[6] or as a distinct historical concept arising out of nominalism, skepticism, and philosophical pessimism, as well as possibly out of Christianity itself.[7] Contemporary understanding of the idea stems largely from the Nietzschean 'crisis of nihilism', from which derives the two central concepts: the destruction of higher values and the opposition to the affirmation of life.[8][4] Earlier forms of nihilism however, may be more selective in negating specific hegemonies of social, moral, political and aesthetic thought.[9] Beyond Europe, elements of Buddhist scripture have been identified as among the earliest discourses and critiques of nihilistic thought. The term is sometimes used in association with anomie to explain the general mood of despair at a perceived pointlessness of existence or arbitrariness of human principles and social institutions. Nihilism has also been described as conspicuous in or constitutive of certain historical periods. For example,[10] Jean Baudrillard[11][12] and others have characterized postmodernity as a nihilistic epoch[13] or mode of thought.[14] Likewise, some theologians and religious figures have stated that postmodernity[15] and many aspects of modernity[16] represent nihilism by a negation of religious principles. Nihilism has, however, been widely ascribed to both religious and irreligious viewpoints.[17] In popular use, the term commonly refers to forms of existential nihilism, according to which life is without intrinsic value, meaning, or purpose.[18] Other prominent positions within nihilism include the rejection of all normative and ethical views (§ Moral nihilism), the rejection of all social and political institutions (§ Political nihilism), the stance that no knowledge can or does exist (§ Epistemological nihilism), and a number of metaphysical positions, which assert that non-abstract objects do not exist (§ Metaphysical nihilism), that composite objects do not exist (§ Mereological nihilism), or even that life itself does not exist. Contents 1 Etymology, terminology and definition 2 History 2.1 Buddhism 2.1.1 Nirvana and nihilism 2.2 Jacobi 2.3 Kierkegaard 2.4 Russian nihilism 2.5 Nietzsche 2.5.1 Heideggerean interpretation of Nietzsche 2.5.2 Deleuzean interpretation of Nietzsche 2.6 Postmodernism 2.6.1 Derrida 2.6.2 Lyotard 2.6.3 Baudrillard 3 Positions 4 In culture and the arts 4.1 Dada 4.2 Literature 5 See also 6 References 7 Sources 7.1 Primary texts 7.2 Secondary texts 8 External links Etymology, terminology and definition[edit] This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (October 2020) The etymological origin of nihilism is the Latin root word nihil, meaning 'nothing', which is similarly found in the related terms annihilate, meaning 'to bring to nothing',[4] and nihility, meaning 'nothingness'.[19] The term nihilism emerged in several places in Europe during the 18th century,[6] notably in the German form Nihilismus,[20] though was also in use during the Middle Ages to denote certain forms of heresy.[21] The concept itself first took shape within Russian and German philosophy, which respectively represented the two major currents of discourse on nihilism prior to the 20th century.[20] The term likely entered English from either the German Nihilismus, Late Latin nihilismus, or French nihilisme.[22] Early examples of the term's use are found in German publication. In 1733, German writer Friedrich Lebrecht Goetz used it as a literary term in combination with noism (German: Neinismus).[23] In the period surrounding the French Revolution, the term was also a pejorative for certain value-destructive trends of modernity, namely the negation of Christianity and European tradition in general.[6] Nihilism first entered philosophical study within a discourse surrounding Kantian and post-Kantian philosophies, notably appearing in the writings of Swiss esotericist Jacob Hermann Obereit in 1787 and German philosopher Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi in 1799.[24] As early as 1824, the term began to take on a social connotation with German journalist Joseph von Görres attributing it to a negation of existing social and political institutions.[25] The Russian form of the word, nigilizm (Russian: нигилизм), entered publication in 1829 when Nikolai Nadezhdin used it synonymously with skepticism. In Russian journalism the word continued to have significant social connotations.[26] From the time of Jacobi, the term almost fell completely out of use throughout Europe until it was revived by Russian author Ivan Turgenev, who brought the word into popular use with his 1862 novel Fathers and Sons, leading many scholars to believe he coined the term.[27] The nihilist characters of the novel define themselves as those who "deny everything", who do "not take any principle on faith, whatever reverence that principle may be enshrined in", and who regard "at the present time, negation is the most useful of all".[28] Despite Turgenev's own anti-nihilistic leanings, many of his readers likewise took up the name of nihilist, thus ascribing the Russian nihilist movement its name.[29] Returning to German philosophy, nihilism was further discussed by German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, who used the term to describe the Western world's disintegration of traditional morality.[30] For Nietzsche, nihilism applied to both the modern trends of value-destruction expressed in the 'death of God', as well as what he saw as the life-denying morality of Christianity.[31][32] Under Nietzsche's profound influence, the term was then further treated within French philosophy and continental philosophy more broadly, while the influence of nihilism in Russia arguably continued well into the Soviet era.[33] Religious scholars such as Altizer have stated that nihilism must necessarily be understood in relation to religion, and that the study of core elements of its character requires fundamentally theological consideration.[34] History[edit] Buddhism[edit] The concept of nihilism was discussed by the Buddha (563 B.C. to 483 B.C.), as recorded in the Theravada and Mahayana Tripiṭaka.[35] The Tripiṭaka, originally written in Pali, refers to nihilism as natthikavāda and the nihilist view as micchādiṭṭhi.[36] Various sutras within it describe a multiplicity of views held by different sects of ascetics while the Buddha was alive, some of which were viewed by him to be morally nihilistic. In the "Doctrine of Nihilism" in the Apannaka Sutta, the Buddha describes moral nihilists as holding the following views:[37] Giving produces no beneficial results; Good and bad actions produce no results; After death, beings are not reborn into the present world or into another world; and There is no one in the world who, through direct knowledge, can confirm that beings are reborn into this world or into another world The Buddha further states that those who hold these views will fail to see the virtue in good mental, verbal, and bodily conduct and the corresponding dangers in misconduct, and will therefore tend towards the latter.[37] Nirvana and nihilism[edit] The culmination of the path that the Buddha taught was nirvana, "a place of nothingness…nonpossession and…non-attachment…[which is] the total end of death and decay."[38] Ajahn Amaro, an ordained Buddhist monk of more than 40 years, observes that in English nothingness can sound like nihilism. However, the word could be emphasized in a different way, so that it becomes no-thingness, indicating that nirvana is not a thing you can find, but rather a state where you experience the reality of non-grasping.[38] In the Alagaddupama Sutta, the Buddha describes how some individuals feared his teaching because they believe that their self would be destroyed if they followed it. He describes this as an anxiety caused by the false belief in an unchanging, everlasting self. All things are subject to change and taking any impermanent phenomena to be a self causes suffering. Nonetheless, his critics called him a nihilist who teaches the annihilation and extermination of an existing being. The Buddha's response was that he only teaches the cessation of suffering. When an individual has given up craving and the conceit of 'I am' their mind is liberated, they no longer come into any state of 'being' and are no longer born again.[39] The Aggi-Vacchagotta Sutta records a conversation between the Buddha and an individual named Vaccha that further elaborates on this. In the sutta, Vaccha asks the Buddha to confirm one of the following, with respect to the existence of the Buddha after death:[40] After death a Buddha reappears somewhere else After death a Buddha does not reappear After death a Buddha both does and does not reappear After death a Buddha neither does nor does not reappear To all four questions, the Buddha answers that the terms "appear," "not appear," "does and does not reappear," and "neither does nor does not reappear" do not apply. When Vaccha expresses puzzlement, the Buddha asks Vaccha a counter question to the effect of: if a fire were to go out and someone were to ask you whether the fire went north, south, east or west, how would you reply? Vaccha replies that the question does not apply and that an extinguished fire can only be classified as 'out'.[40] Ṭhānissaro Bhikkhu elaborates on the classification problem around the words 'reappear,' etc. with respect to the Buddha and Nirvana by stating that a "person who has attained the goal [nirvana] is thus indescribable because [they have] abandoned all things by which [they] could be described."[41] The Suttas themselves describe the liberated mind as 'untraceable' or as 'consciousness without feature', making no distinction between the mind of a liberated being that is alive and the mind of one that is no longer alive.[39][42] Despite the Buddha's explanations to the contrary, Buddhist practitioners may, at times, still approach Buddhism in a nihilistic manner. Ajahn Amaro illustrates this by retelling the story of a Buddhist monk, Ajahn Sumedho, who in his early years took a nihilistic approach to Nirvana. A distinct feature of Nirvana in Buddhism is that an individual attaining it is no longer subject to rebirth. Ajahn Sumedho, during a conversation with his teacher Ajahn Chah, comments that he is "determined above all things to fully realize Nirvana in this lifetime…deeply weary of the human condition and…[is] determined not to be born again." To this, Ajahn Chah replies: "what about the rest of us, Sumedho? Don't you care about those who'll be left behind?" Ajahn Amaro comments that Ajahn Chah could detect that his student had a nihilistic aversion to life rather than true detachment.[43] Jacobi[edit] The term nihilism was first introduced by Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi (1743–1819), who used the term to characterize rationalism,[44] and in particular the Spinoza's determinism and the Aufklärung, in order to carry out a reductio ad absurdum according to which all rationalism (philosophy as criticism) reduces to nihilism—and thus it should be avoided and replaced with a return to some type of faith and revelation. Bret W. Davis writes, for example:[45] The first philosophical development of the idea of nihilism is generally ascribed to Friedrich Jacobi, who in a famous letter criticized Fichte's idealism as falling into nihilism. According to Jacobi, Fichte's absolutization of the ego (the 'absolute I' that posits the 'not-I') is an inflation of subjectivity that denies the absolute transcendence of God. A related but oppositional concept is fideism, which sees reason as hostile and inferior to faith. Kierkegaard[edit] Main article: Philosophy of Søren Kierkegaard unfinished sketch c. 1840 of Søren Kierkegaard by his cousin Niels Christian Kierkegaard Søren Kierkegaard (1813–1855) posited an early form of nihilism, which he referred to as leveling.[46] He saw leveling as the process of suppressing individuality to a point where an individual's uniqueness becomes non-existent and nothing meaningful in one's existence can be affirmed: Levelling at its maximum is like the stillness of death, where one can hear one's own heartbeat, a stillness like death, into which nothing can penetrate, in which everything sinks, powerless. One person can head a rebellion, but one person cannot head this levelling process, for that would make him a leader and he would avoid being levelled. Each individual can in his little circle participate in this levelling, but it is an abstract process, and levelling is abstraction conquering individuality. — The Present Age, translated by Alexander Dru, with Foreword by Walter Kaufmann, 1962, pp. 51–53 Kierkegaard, an advocate of a philosophy of life, generally argued against levelling and its nihilistic consequences, although he believed it would be "genuinely educative to live in the age of levelling [because] people will be forced to face the judgement of [levelling] alone."[47] George Cotkin asserts Kierkegaard was against "the standardization and levelling of belief, both spiritual and political, in the nineteenth century," and that Kierkegaard "opposed tendencies in mass culture to reduce the individual to a cipher of conformity and deference to the dominant opinion."[48] In his day, tabloids (like the Danish magazine Corsaren) and apostate Christianity were instruments of levelling and contributed to the "reflective apathetic age" of 19th century Europe.[49] Kierkegaard argues that individuals who can overcome the levelling process are stronger for it, and that it represents a step in the right direction towards "becoming a true self."[47][50] As we must overcome levelling,[51] Hubert Dreyfus and Jane Rubin argue that Kierkegaard's interest, "in an increasingly nihilistic age, is in how we can recover the sense that our lives are meaningful."[52] Russian nihilism[edit] Main article: Russian nihilist movement Portrait of a nihilist student by Ilya Repin From the period 1860–1917, Russian nihilism was both a nascent form of nihilist philosophy and broad cultural movement which overlapped with certain revolutionary tendencies of the era,[53] for which it was often wrongly characterized as a form of political terrorism.[54] Russian nihilism centered on the dissolution of existing values and ideals, incorporating theories of hard determinism, atheism, materialism, positivism, and rational egoism, while rejecting metaphysics, sentimentalism, and aestheticism.[55] Leading philosophers of this school of thought included Nikolay Chernyshevsky and Dmitry Pisarev.[56] The intellectual origins of the Russian nihilist movement can be traced back to 1855 and perhaps earlier,[57] where it was principally a philosophy of extreme moral and epistemological skepticism.[58] However, it was not until 1862 that the name nihilism was first popularized, when Ivan Turgenev used the term in his celebrated novel Fathers and Sons to describe the disillusionment of the younger generation towards both the progressives and traditionalists that came before them,[59] as well as its manifestation in the view that negation and value-destruction were most necessary to the present conditions.[60] The movement very soon adopted the name, despite the novel's initial harsh reception among both the conservatives and younger generation.[61] Though philosophically both nihilistic and skeptical, Russian nihilism did not unilaterally negate ethics and knowledge as may be assumed, nor did it espouse meaninglessness unequivocally.[62] Even so, contemporary scholarship has challenged the equating of Russian nihilism with mere skepticism, instead identifying it as a fundamentally Promethean movement.[63] As passionate advocates of negation, the nihilists sought to liberate the Promethean might of the Russian people which they saw embodied in a class of prototypal individuals, or new types in their own words.[64] These individuals, according to Pisarev, in freeing themselves from all authority become exempt from moral authority as well, and are distinguished above the rabble or common masses.[65] Later interpretations of nihilism were heavily influenced by works of anti-nihilistic literature, such as those of Fyodor Dostoevsky, which arose in response to Russian nihilism.[66] "In contrast to the corrupted nihilists [of the real world], who tried to numb their nihilistic sensitivity and forget themselves through self-indulgence, Dostoevsky's figures voluntarily leap into nihilism and try to be themselves within its boundaries", writes contemporary scholar Nishitani. "The nihility expressed in 'if there is no God, everything is permitted', or 'après moi, le déluge', provides a principle whose sincerity they try to live out to the end. They search for and experiment with ways for the self to justify itself after God has disappeared."[67] Nietzsche[edit] Main article: Philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche Nihilism is often associated with the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, who provided a detailed diagnosis of nihilism as a widespread phenomenon of Western culture. Though the notion appears frequently throughout Nietzsche's work, he uses the term in a variety of ways, with different meanings and connotations. Karen L. Carr describes Nietzsche's characterization of nihilism "as a condition of tension, as a disproportion between what we want to value (or need) and how the world appears to operate."[31]:25 When we find out that the world does not possess the objective value or meaning that we want it to have or have long since believed it to have, we find ourselves in a crisis.[68] Nietzsche asserts that with the decline of Christianity and the rise of physiological decadence,[clarification needed] nihilism is in fact characteristic of the modern age,[69] though he implies that the rise of nihilism is still incomplete and that it has yet to be overcome.[70] Though the problem of nihilism becomes especially explicit in Nietzsche's notebooks (published posthumously), it is mentioned repeatedly in his published works and is closely connected to many of the problems mentioned there. Nietzsche characterized nihilism as emptying the world and especially human existence of meaning, purpose, comprehensible truth, or essential value. This observation stems in part from Nietzsche's perspectivism, or his notion that "knowledge" is always by someone of some thing: it is always bound by perspective, and it is never mere fact.[71] Rather, there are interpretations through which we understand the world and give it meaning. Interpreting is something we can not go without; in fact, it is a condition of subjectivity. One way of interpreting the world is through morality, as one of the fundamental ways that people make sense of the world, especially in regard to their own thoughts and actions. Nietzsche distinguishes a morality that is strong or healthy, meaning that the person in question is aware that he constructs it himself, from weak morality, where the interpretation is projected on to something external. Nietzsche discusses Christianity, one of the major topics in his work, at length in the context of the problem of nihilism in his notebooks, in a chapter entitled "European Nihilism."[72] Here he states that the Christian moral doctrine provides people with intrinsic value, belief in God (which justifies the evil in the world) and a basis for objective knowledge. In this sense, in constructing a world where objective knowledge is possible, Christianity is an antidote against a primal form of nihilism, against the despair of meaninglessness. However, it is exactly the element of truthfulness in Christian doctrine that is its undoing: in its drive towards truth, Christianity eventually finds itself to be a construct, which leads to its own dissolution. It is therefore that Nietzsche states that we have outgrown Christianity "not because we lived too far from it, rather because we lived too close".[73] As such, the self-dissolution of Christianity constitutes yet another form of nihilism. Because Christianity was an interpretation that posited itself as the interpretation, Nietzsche states that this dissolution leads beyond skepticism to a distrust of all meaning.[74][31]:41–2 Stanley Rosen identifies Nietzsche's concept of nihilism with a situation of meaninglessness, in which "everything is permitted." According to him, the loss of higher metaphysical values that exist in contrast to the base reality of the world, or merely human ideas, gives rise to the idea that all human ideas are therefore valueless. Rejecting idealism thus results in nihilism, because only similarly transcendent ideals live up to the previous standards that the nihilist still implicitly holds.[75] The inability for Christianity to serve as a source of valuating the world is reflected in Nietzsche's famous aphorism of the madman in The Gay Science.[76] The death of God, in particular the statement that "we killed him", is similar to the self-dissolution of Christian doctrine: due to the advances of the sciences, which for Nietzsche show that man is the product of evolution, that Earth has no special place among the stars and that history is not progressive, the Christian notion of God can no longer serve as a basis for a morality. One such reaction to the loss of meaning is what Nietzsche calls passive nihilism, which he recognizes in the pessimistic philosophy of Schopenhauer. Schopenhauer's doctrine, which Nietzsche also refers to as Western Buddhism, advocates separating oneself from will and desires in order to reduce suffering. Nietzsche characterizes this ascetic attitude as a "will to nothingness", whereby life turns away from itself, as there is nothing of value to be found in the world. This mowing away of all value in the world is characteristic of the nihilist, although in this, the nihilist appears inconsistent: this "will to nothingness" is still a form of valuation or willing.[77] He describes this as "an inconsistency on the part of the nihilists:" A nihilist is a man who judges of the world as it is that it ought not to be, and of the world as it ought to be that it does not exist. According to this view, our existence (action, suffering, willing, feeling) has no meaning: the pathos of 'in vain' is the nihilists' pathos – at the same time, as pathos, an inconsistency on the part of the nihilists. — Friedrich Nietzsche, KSA 12:9 [60], taken from The Will to Power, section 585, translated by Walter Kaufmann Nietzsche's relation to the problem of nihilism is a complex one. He approaches the problem of nihilism as deeply personal, stating that this predicament of the modern world is a problem that has "become conscious" in him.[78] According to Nietzsche, it is only when nihilism is overcome that a culture can have a true foundation upon which to thrive. He wished to hasten its coming only so that he could also hasten its ultimate departure.[69] He states that there is at least the possibility of another type of nihilist in the wake of Christianity's self-dissolution, one that does not stop after the destruction of all value and meaning and succumb to the following nothingness. This alternate, 'active' nihilism on the other hand destroys to level the field for constructing something new. This form of nihilism is characterized by Nietzsche as "a sign of strength,"[79] a willful destruction of the old values to wipe the slate clean and lay down one's own beliefs and interpretations, contrary to the passive nihilism that resigns itself with the decomposition of the old values. This willful destruction of values and the overcoming of the condition of nihilism by the constructing of new meaning, this active nihilism, could be related to what Nietzsche elsewhere calls a free spirit[31]:43–50 or the Übermensch from Thus Spoke Zarathustra and The Antichrist, the model of the strong individual who posits his own values and lives his life as if it were his own work of art. It may be questioned, though, whether "active nihilism" is indeed the correct term for this stance, and some question whether Nietzsche takes the problems nihilism poses seriously enough.[80] Heideggerean interpretation of Nietzsche[edit] Martin Heidegger's interpretation of Nietzsche influenced many postmodern thinkers who investigated the problem of nihilism as put forward by Nietzsche. Only recently has Heidegger's influence on Nietzschean nihilism research faded.[81] As early as the 1930s, Heidegger was giving lectures on Nietzsche's thought.[82] Given the importance of Nietzsche's contribution to the topic of nihilism, Heidegger's influential interpretation of Nietzsche is important for the historical development of the term nihilism. Heidegger's method of researching and teaching Nietzsche is explicitly his own. He does not specifically try to present Nietzsche as Nietzsche. He rather tries to incorporate Nietzsche's thoughts into his own philosophical system of Being, Time and Dasein.[83] In his Nihilism as Determined by the History of Being (1944–46),[84] Heidegger tries to understand Nietzsche's nihilism as trying to achieve a victory through the devaluation of the, until then, highest values. The principle of this devaluation is, according to Heidegger, the will to power. The will to power is also the principle of every earlier valuation of values.[85] How does this devaluation occur and why is this nihilistic? One of Heidegger's main critiques on philosophy is that philosophy, and more specifically metaphysics, has forgotten to discriminate between investigating the notion of a being (seiende) and Being (Sein). According to Heidegger, the history of Western thought can be seen as the history of metaphysics. Moreover, because metaphysics has forgotten to ask about the notion of Being (what Heidegger calls Seinsvergessenheit), it is a history about the destruction of Being. That is why Heidegger calls metaphysics nihilistic.[86] This makes Nietzsche's metaphysics not a victory over nihilism, but a perfection of it.[87] Heidegger, in his interpretation of Nietzsche, has been inspired by Ernst Jünger. Many references to Jünger can be found in Heidegger's lectures on Nietzsche. For example, in a letter to the rector of Freiburg University of November 4, 1945, Heidegger, inspired by Jünger, tries to explain the notion of "God is dead" as the "reality of the Will to Power." Heidegger also praises Jünger for defending Nietzsche against a too biological or anthropological reading during the Nazi era.[88] Heidegger's interpretation of Nietzsche influenced a number of important postmodernist thinkers. Gianni Vattimo points at a back-and-forth movement in European thought, between Nietzsche and Heidegger. During the 1960s, a Nietzschean 'renaissance' began, culminating in the work of Mazzino Montinari and Giorgio Colli. They began work on a new and complete edition of Nietzsche's collected works, making Nietzsche more accessible for scholarly research. Vattimo explains that with this new edition of Colli and Montinari, a critical reception of Heidegger's interpretation of Nietzsche began to take shape. Like other contemporary French and Italian philosophers, Vattimo does not want, or only partially wants, to rely on Heidegger for understanding Nietzsche. On the other hand, Vattimo judges Heidegger's intentions authentic enough to keep pursuing them.[89] Philosophers who Vattimo exemplifies as a part of this back and forth movement are French philosophers Deleuze, Foucault and Derrida. Italian philosophers of this same movement are Cacciari, Severino and himself.[90] Jürgen Habermas, Jean-François Lyotard and Richard Rorty are also philosophers who are influenced by Heidegger's interpretation of Nietzsche.[91] Deleuzean interpretation of Nietzsche[edit] Gilles Deleuze's interpretation of Nietzsche's concept of nihilism is different - in some sense diametrically opposed - to the usual definition (as outlined in the rest of this article). Nihilism is one of the main topics of Deleuze's early book Nietzsche and Philosophy (1962).[92] There, Deleuze repeatedly interprets Nietzsche's nihilism as "the enterprise of denying life and depreciating existence".[93] Nihilism thus defined is therefore not the denial of higher values, or the denial of meaning, but rather the depreciation of life in the name of such higher values or meaning. Deleuze therefore (with, he claims, Nietzsche) says that Christianity and Platonism, and with them the whole of metaphysics, are intrinsically nihilist. Postmodernism[edit] Postmodern and poststructuralist thought has questioned the very grounds on which Western cultures have based their 'truths': absolute knowledge and meaning, a 'decentralization' of authorship, the accumulation of positive knowledge, historical progress, and certain ideals and practices of humanism and the Enlightenment. Derrida[edit] Jacques Derrida, whose deconstruction is perhaps most commonly labeled nihilistic, did not himself make the nihilistic move that others have claimed. Derridean deconstructionists argue that this approach rather frees texts, individuals or organizations from a restrictive truth, and that deconstruction opens up the possibility of other ways of being.[94] Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, for example, uses deconstruction to create an ethics of opening up Western scholarship to the voice of the subaltern and to philosophies outside of the canon of western texts.[95] Derrida himself built a philosophy based upon a 'responsibility to the other'.[96] Deconstruction can thus be seen not as a denial of truth, but as a denial of our ability to know truth. That is to say, it makes an epistemological claim, compared to nihilism's ontological claim. Lyotard[edit] Lyotard argues that, rather than relying on an objective truth or method to prove their claims, philosophers legitimize their truths by reference to a story about the world that can't be separated from the age and system the stories belong to—referred to by Lyotard as meta-narratives. He then goes on to define the postmodern condition as characterized by a rejection both of these meta-narratives and of the process of legitimation by meta-narratives. This concept of the instability of truth and meaning leads in the direction of nihilism, though Lyotard stops short of embracing the latter.[citation needed] In lieu of meta-narratives we have created new language-games in order to legitimize our claims which rely on changing relationships and mutable truths, none of which is privileged over the other to speak to ultimate truth.[citation needed] Baudrillard[edit] Postmodern theorist Jean Baudrillard wrote briefly of nihilism from the postmodern viewpoint in Simulacra and Simulation. He stuck mainly to topics of interpretations of the real world over the simulations of which the real world is composed. The uses of meaning were an important subject in Baudrillard's discussion of nihilism: The apocalypse is finished, today it is the precession of the neutral, of forms of the neutral and of indifference...all that remains, is the fascination for desertlike and indifferent forms, for the very operation of the system that annihilates us. Now, fascination (in contrast to seduction, which was attached to appearances, and to dialectical reason, which was attached to meaning) is a nihilistic passion par excellence, it is the passion proper to the mode of disappearance. We are fascinated by all forms of disappearance, of our disappearance. Melancholic and fascinated, such is our general situation in an era of involuntary transparency. — Jean Baudrillard, Simulacra and Simulation, "On Nihilism", trans. 1995[page needed] Positions[edit] From the 20th century, nihilism has encompassed a range of positions within various fields of philosophy. Each of these, as the Encyclopædia Britannica states, "denied the existence of genuine moral truths or values, rejected the possibility of knowledge or communication, and asserted the ultimate meaninglessness or purposelessness of life or of the universe."[97] Cosmic nihilism is the position that reality or the cosmos is either wholly or significantly unintelligible and that it provides no foundation for human aims and principles. Particularly, it may regard the cosmos as distinctly hostile or indifferent to humanity.[98] It is often related to both epistemological and existential nihilism, as well as cosmicism. Epistemological nihilism is a form of philosophical skepticism according to which knowledge does not exist, or, if it does exist, it is unattainable for human beings. It should not be confused with epistemological fallibilism, according to which all knowledge is uncertain. Existential nihilism is the position that life has no intrinsic meaning or value. With respect to the universe, existential nihilism posits that a single human or even the entire human species is insignificant, without purpose, and unlikely to change in the totality of existence. The meaninglessness or meaning of life is largely explored in the philosophical school of existentialism. In popular use, "nihilism" now most commonly refers to forms of existential nihilism. Metaphysical nihilism is the position that concrete objects and physical constructs might not exist in the possible world, or that, even if there exist possible worlds that contain some concrete objects, there is at least one that contains only abstract objects. Extreme metaphysical nihilism, also sometimes called ontological nihilism, is the position that nothing actually exists at all.[99][100] The American Heritage Medical Dictionary defines one form of nihilism as "an extreme form of skepticism that denies all existence."[101] A similar skepticism concerning the concrete world can be found in solipsism. However, despite the fact that both views deny the certainty of objects' true existence, the nihilist would deny the existence of self, whereas the solipsist would affirm it.[102] Both of these positions are considered forms of anti-realism. Mereological nihilism, also called compositional nihilism, is the metaphysical position that objects with proper parts do not exist. This position applies to objects in space, and also to objects existing in time, which are posited to have no temporal parts. Rather, only basic building blocks without parts exist, and thus the world we see and experience, full of objects with parts, is a product of human misperception (i.e., if we could see clearly, we would not perceive compositive objects). This interpretation of existence must be based on resolution: The resolution with which humans see and perceive the "improper parts" of the world is not an objective fact of reality, but is rather an implicit trait that can only be qualitatively explored and expressed. Therefore, there is no arguable way to surmise or measure the validity of mereological nihilism. For example, an ant can get lost on a large cylindrical object because the circumference of the object is so large with respect to the ant that the ant effectively feels as though the object has no curvature. Thus, the resolution with which the ant views the world it exists "within" is an important determining factor in how the ant experiences this "within the world" feeling. Moral nihilism, also called ethical nihilism, is the meta-ethical position that no morality or ethics exists whatsoever; therefore, no action is ever morally preferable to any other. Moral nihilism is distinct from both moral relativism and expressivism in that it does not acknowledge socially constructed values as personal or cultural moralities. It may also differ from other moral positions within nihilism that, rather than argue there is no morality, hold that if it does exist, it is a human construction and thus artificial, wherein any and all meaning is relative for different possible outcomes. An alternative scholarly perspective is that moral nihilism is a morality in itself. Cooper writes, "In the widest sense of the word 'morality', moral nihilism is a morality."[103] Passive and active nihilism, the former of which is also equated to philosophical pessimism, refer to two approaches to nihilist thought; passive nihilism sees nihility as an end in itself, whereas active nihilism attempts to surpass it. For Nietzsche, passive nihilism further encapsulates the "will to nothing" and the modern condition of resignation or unawareness towards the dissolution of higher values brought about by the 19th century.[31][104] Political nihilism is the position holding no political goals whatsoever, except for the complete destruction of all existing political institutions—along with the principles, values, and social institutions that uphold them.[105] Though often related to anarchism, it may differ in that it presents no method of social organisation after a negation of the current political structure has taken place. An analysis of political nihilism is further presented by Leo Strauss.[106] Scientific nihilism is the position that scientific study and attempts to apply scientific knowledge are dubious or without merit.[107] Therapeutic nihilism, also called medical nihilism, is the position that the effectiveness of medical intervention is dubious or without merit.[108] Dealing with the philosophy of science as it relates to the contextualized demarcation of medical research, Jacob Stegenga applies Bayes' theorem to medical research and argues for the premise that "even when presented with evidence for a hypothesis regarding the effectiveness of a medical intervention, we ought to have low confidence in that hypothesis."[109][110] In culture and the arts[edit] Dada[edit] The term Dada was first used by Richard Huelsenbeck and Tristan Tzara in 1916.[111] The movement, which lasted from approximately 1916 to 1923, arose during World War I, an event that influenced the artists.[112] The Dada Movement began in the old town of Zürich, Switzerland—known as the "Niederdorf" or "Niederdörfli"—in the Café Voltaire.[113] The Dadaists claimed that Dada was not an art movement, but an anti-art movement, sometimes using found objects in a manner similar to found poetry. The "anti-art" drive is thought[by whom?] to have stemmed from a post-war emptiness.[citation needed] This tendency toward devaluation of art has led many[who?] to claim that Dada was an essentially nihilistic movement.[citation needed] Given that Dada created its own means for interpreting its products, it is difficult to classify alongside most other contemporary art expressions. Due to perceived ambiguity, it has been classified as a nihilistic modus vivendi.[112] Literature[edit] The term "nihilism" was actually popularized in 1862 by Ivan Turgenev in his novel Fathers and Sons, whose hero, Bazarov, was a nihilist and recruited several followers to the philosophy. He found his nihilistic ways challenged upon falling in love.[114] Anton Chekhov portrayed nihilism when writing Three Sisters. The phrase "what does it matter" or variants of this are often spoken by several characters in response to events; the significance of some of these events suggests a subscription to nihilism by said characters as a type of coping strategy. The philosophical ideas of the French author, the Marquis de Sade, are often noted as early examples of nihilistic principles.[115] See also[edit] Absurdism Acosmism Agnosticism Anarchism Anatta Anti-art and Anti-anti-art Anti-humanism Antinatalism Apatheism Apathy Cosmicism Cynicism (philosophy) Dysteleology Egoism Eliminative materialism Existentialism Hedonism U. G. Krishnamurti Legal nihilism Misanthropy Misotheism Moral nihilism National nihilism Nirvana Paradox of nihilism Pessimism Postmodernism Post-structuralism Radical skepticism Russian nihilist movement Solipsism Tao Te Ching Therapeutic nihilism Trivialism Philosophy portal Psychology portal Religion portal References[edit] ^ Crosby, Donald A. (1998). "Nihilism". Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Taylor and Francis. doi:10.4324/9780415249126-N037-1. As its name implies (from Latin nihil, 'nothing'), philosophical nihilism is a philosophy of negation, rejection, or denial of some or all aspects of thought or life. ^ Deleuze, Gilles (1962). Nietzsche and Philosophy. Translated by Tomlinson, Hugh. London: The Athlone Press (published 1983). ISBN 978-0-231-13877-2. Nietzsche calls the enterprise of denying life and depreciating existence nihilism. ^ Crosby, Donald A. (1998). "Nihilism". Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Taylor and Francis. doi:10.4324/9780415249126-N037-1. As its name implies (from Latin nihil, 'nothing'), philosophical nihilism is a philosophy of negation, rejection, or denial of some or all aspects of thought or life. Pratt, Alan. "Nihilism". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Archived from the original on 2010-04-12. Nihilism is the belief that all values are baseless and that nothing can be known or communicated. It is often associated with extreme pessimism and a radical skepticism that condemns existence. "Nihilism". Encyclopædia Britannica. In the 20th century, nihilism encompassed a variety of philosophical and aesthetic stances that, in one sense or another, denied the existence of genuine moral truths or values, rejected the possibility of knowledge or communication, and asserted the ultimate meaninglessness or purposelessness of life or of the universe. Harper, Douglas. "nihilism". Online Etymology Dictionary. ^ a b c Pratt, Alan. "Nihilism." Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Archived 2010-04-12 at the Wayback Machine ^ "The Meaning of Life#Nihilism". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 3 August 2020. ^ a b c ter Borg, Meerten B. (1988). "The Problem of Nihilism: A Sociological Approach". Sociological Analysis. 49 (1): 1–16. doi:10.2307/3711099. JSTOR 3711099. ^ Gillespie, Michael Allen (1996). Nihilism Before Nietzsche. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 9780226293486. Deleuze, Gilles (1983) [1962]. Nietzsche and Philosophy. Translated by Tomlinson, Hugh. London: The Athlone Press. ISBN 978-0-231-13877-2. ^ Gillespie, Michael Allen (1996). Nihilism Before Nietzsche. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 9780226293486. ^ Gillespie, Michael Allen (1996). Nihilism Before Nietzsche. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 9780226293486. Petrov, Kristian (2019). "'Strike out, right and left!': a conceptual-historical analysis of 1860s Russian nihilism and its notion of negation". Stud East Eur Thought. 71: 73–97. doi:10.1007/s11212-019-09319-4. ^ Cited in Woodward, Ashley. 2002. "Nihilism and the Postmodern in Vattimo's Nietzsche." Minerva 6. ISSN 1393-614X. Archived from the original on 2010-04-05. fn 1. ^ Baudrillard, Jean. 1993. "Game with Vestiges." In Baudrillard Live, edited by M. Gane. ^ Baudrillard, Jean. [1981] 1994. "On Nihilism." In Simulacra and Simulation, translated by S. F. Glasser. ^ See: Toynbee, Arnold J. 1963. A Study of History VIII & IX; Mills, C. Wright. 1959. The Sociological Imagination; Bell, Daniel. 1976. The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism. ^ see: Rose, Gillian. 1984. Dialectic of Nihilism; Carr, Karen L. 1988. The Banalization of Nihilism; Pope John-Paul II. 1995. Evangelium vitae: Il valore e l'inviolabilita delta vita umana. Milan: Paoline Editoriale Libri." ^ Leffel, Jim; Dennis McCallum. "The Postmodern Challenge: Facing the Spirit of the Age". Christian Research Institute. Archived from the original on 2006-08-19. ...the nihilism and loneliness of postmodern culture... ^ Phillips, Robert (1999). "Deconstructing the Mass". Latin Mass Magazine (Winter). Archived from the original on 2004-04-17. For deconstructionists, not only is there no truth to know, there is no self to know it and so there is no soul to save or lose." and "In following the Enlightenment to its logical end, deconstruction reaches nihilism. The meaning of human life is reduced to whatever happens to interest us at the moment... ^ Gillespie, Michael Allen (1996). Nihilism Before Nietzsche. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 9780226293486. Deleuze, Gilles (1983) [1962]. Nietzsche and Philosophy. Translated by Tomlinson, Hugh. London: The Athlone Press. ISBN 978-0-231-13877-2. ^ Pratt, Alan. "Existential Nihilism | Nihilism." Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Archived 2010-04-12 at the Wayback Machine: Existential nihilism is "the notion that life has no intrinsic meaning or value, and it is, no doubt, the most commonly used and understood sense of the word today." ^ "Nihility". Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary. Merriam-Webster. Retrieved November 4, 2020. ^ a b "Nichilismo". Enciclopedia Italiana: Enciclopedia online (in Italian). Treccani: Istituto della Enciclopedia Italiana. Retrieved October 30, 2020. ^ "Nihilism". Encyclopædia Britannica. The term is an old one, applied to certain heretics in the Middle Ages. ^ "nihilism". Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. September 2003.  (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) ^ Gloy, Karen (2014). "Nihilismus–Pessimismus". Zwischen Glück und Tragik (in German). Wilhelm Fink. pp. 145–200. doi:10.30965/9783846756454_007. ^ Klemme, Heiner F.; Kuehn, Manfred, eds. (2010). "Obereit, Jacob Hermann". The Dictionary of Eighteenth-Century German Philosophers. Continuum. ISBN 9780199797097. di Giovanni, George. "Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi". In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2008 ed.). Archived from the original on 2013-12-02. ^ Harper, Douglas. "nihilism". Online Etymology Dictionary. ^ "Nihilism". Encyclopædia Britannica. In Russian literature, nihilism was probably first used by N.I. Nadezhdin, in an 1829 article in the Messenger of Europe, in which he applied it to Aleksandr Pushkin. Nadezhdin, as did V.V. Bervi in 1858, equated nihilism with skepticism. Mikhail Nikiforovich Katkov, a well-known conservative journalist who interpreted nihilism as synonymous with revolution, presented it as a social menace because of its negation of all moral principles. ^ Gillespie, Michael Allen (1996). Nihilism Before Nietzsche. University of Chicago Press. p. 110. ISBN 9780226293486. ^ Frank, Joseph (1995). Dostoevsky: The Miraculous Years, 1865–1871. Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-01587-2. For it was Bazarov who had first declared himself to be a "Nihilist" and who announced that, "since at the present time, negation is the most useful of all," the Nihilists "deny—everything." Turgenev, Ivan. "Chapter 5". Fathers and Sons. Translated by Constance Garnett. A nihilist is a man who does not bow down before any authority, who does not take any principle on faith, whatever reverence that principle may be enshrined in. ^ Petrov, Kristian (2019). "'Strike out, right and left!': a conceptual-historical analysis of 1860s Russian nihilism and its notion of negation". Stud East Eur Thought. 71 (2): 73–97. doi:10.1007/s11212-019-09319-4. S2CID 150893870. ^ "Nihilism". Encyclopædia Britannica. The term was famously used by Friedrich Nietzsche to describe the disintegration of traditional morality in Western society. ^ a b c d e Carr, Karen L. 1992. The Banalisation of Nihilism. Albany: State University of New York Press. ^ Deleuze, Gilles (1983) [1962]. Nietzsche and Philosophy. Translated by Tomlinson, Hugh. London: The Athlone Press. ISBN 978-0-231-13877-2. }} ^ Ramos, Alice (1996). "Triumph of the Will". The Review of Politics. 58 (1): 181–184. doi:10.1017/S0034670500051779. Altizer, Thomas J. J. (1997). "Review: Nihilism before Nietzsche by Michael Allen Gillespie and Metaphysics by Michel Haar & Michael Gendre". The Journal of Religion. University of Chicago Press. 77 (2): 328–330. doi:10.2307/1205805. ^ Altizer, Thomas J. J. (1997). "Review: Nihilism before Nietzsche by Michael Allen Gillespie and Metaphysics by Michel Haar & Michael Gendre". The Journal of Religion. University of Chicago Press. 77 (2): 328–330. doi:10.2307/1205805. ^ Editors, History com. "Buddhists celebrate birth of Gautama Buddha". HISTORY. Archived from the original on September 2, 2019. Retrieved Apr 7, 2020.CS1 maint: extra text: authors list (link) ^ Bhikkhu Bodhi. "Pali-English Glossary" and "Index of Subjects." In The Connected Discourses of the Buddha: A New Translation of the Samyutta Nikkaya. ^ a b Bhikkhu Ñāṇamoli, and Bhikkhu Bodhi, trans. "Apannaka Sutta." In The Middle Length Discourses of the Buddha. note 425 ^ a b Pasanno, Ajahn; Amaro, Ajahn (October 2009). "Knowing, Emptiness and the Radiant Mind" (PDF). Forest Sangha Newsletter (88): 5. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 June 2018. Retrieved 24 June 2019. ^ a b Alagaddupama Sutta, The Middle Length Discourses of the Buddha (PDF). Translated by Nanamoli, Bikkhu; Bodhi, Bikkhu. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2015-09-26. Retrieved 2019-06-24. ^ a b Aggi-Vacchagotta Sutta: To Vacchagotta on Fire. Translated by Bhikkhu, Thanissaro. 1997. Archived from the original on 6 June 2019. Retrieved 24 June 2019 – via Accesstoinsight.org. ^ Bhikkhu, Thanissaro (1999). "'This fire that has gone out... in which direction from here has it gone?'". Mind Like Fire Unbound (Fourth ed.). Retrieved 24 June 2019 – via Accesstoinsight.org. ^ Kevatta (Kevaddha) Sutta: To Kevatta. Translated by Bhikkhu, Thanissaro. 1997. Archived from the original on 24 March 2019. Retrieved 24 June 2019 – via Accesstoinsight.org. ^ Amaro, Ajahn (7 May 2015) [2008]. "A Dhamma article by Ajahn Amaro – The View from the Centre". Amaravati Buddhist Monastery. Archived from the original on 12 June 2018. Retrieved 24 June 2019. ^ George di Giovanni, Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi, The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). Stanford.edu Archived 2013-12-02 at the Wayback Machine ^ Davis, Bret W. 2004. "Zen After Zarathustra: The Problem of the Will in the Confrontation Between Nietzsche and Buddhism." Journal of Nietzsche Studies 28:89–138. p. 107. ^ Dreyfus, Hubert. 2004. "Kierkegaard on the Internet: Anonymity vs. Commitment in the Present Age." Berkeley.edu. Archived from the original on 2013-12-22. ^ a b Hannay, Alastair. Kierkegaard, p. 289. ^ Cotkin, George. Existential America, p. 59. ^ Kierkegaard, Søren. The Present Age, translated by Alexander Dru with Foreword by Walter Kaufmann ^ Kierkegaard, Søren. 1849. The Sickness Unto Death ^ Barnett, Christopher. Kierkegaard, pietism and holiness, p. 156. ^ Wrathall, Mark, et al. Heidegger, Authenticity, and Modernity. p. 107. ^ "Nihilism". Encyclopædia Britannica. Nihilism, (from Latin nihil, "nothing"), originally a philosophy of moral and epistemological skepticism that arose in 19th-century Russia during the early years of the reign of Tsar Alexander II. Pratt, Alan. "Nihilism". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. In Russia, nihilism became identified with a loosely organized revolutionary movement (C.1860-1917) that rejected the authority of the state, church, and family. Lovell, Stephen (1998). "Nihilism, Russian". Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Taylor and Francis. doi:10.4324/9780415249126-E072-1. ISBN 9780415250696. Nihilism was a broad social and cultural movement as well as a doctrine. ^ "Nihilism". Encyclopædia Britannica. The philosophy of nihilism then began to be associated erroneously with the regicide of Alexander II (1881) and the political terror that was employed by those active at the time in clandestine organizations opposed to absolutism. ^ Petrov, Kristian (2019). "'Strike out, right and left!': a conceptual-historical analysis of 1860s Russian nihilism and its notion of negation". Stud East Eur Thought. 71: 73–97. doi:10.1007/s11212-019-09319-4. Scanlan, James P. (1999). "The Case against Rational Egoism in Dostoevsky's Notes from Underground". Journal of the History of Ideas. University of Pennsylvania Press. 60 (3): 553–554. JSTOR 3654018. ^ Lovell, Stephen (1998). "Nihilism, Russian". Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Taylor and Francis. doi:10.4324/9780415249126-E072-1. ISBN 9780415250696. The major theorists of Russian Nihilism were Nikolai Chernyshevskii and Dmitrii Pisarev, although their authority and influence extended well beyond the realm of theory. ^ Lovell, Stephen (1998). "Nihilism, Russian". Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Taylor and Francis. doi:10.4324/9780415249126-E072-1. ISBN 9780415250696. Russian Nihilism is perhaps best regarded as the intellectual pool of the period 1855–66 out of which later radical movements emerged Nishitani, Keiji (1990). McCormick, Peter J. (ed.). The Self-Overcoming of Nihilism. Translated by Graham Parkes; with Setsuko Aihara. State University of New York Press. ISBN 0791404382. Nihilism and anarchism, which for a while would completely dominate the intelligentsia and become a major factor in the history of nineteenth-century Russia, emerged in the final years of the reign of Alexander I. ^ "Nihilism". Encyclopædia Britannica. Nihilism, (from Latin nihil, "nothing"), originally a philosophy of moral and epistemological skepticism that arose in 19th-century Russia during the early years of the reign of Tsar Alexander II. ^ Petrov, Kristian (2019). "'Strike out, right and left!': a conceptual-historical analysis of 1860s Russian nihilism and its notion of negation". Stud East Eur Thought. 71: 73–97. doi:10.1007/s11212-019-09319-4. Even so, the term nihilism did not become popular until Turgenev published F&C in 1862. Turgenev, a sorokovnik (an 1840s man), used the term to describe "the children", the new generation of students and intellectuals who, by virtue of their relation to their fathers, were considered šestidesjatniki. "Nihilism". Encyclopædia Britannica. It was Ivan Turgenev, in his celebrated novel Fathers and Sons (1862), who popularized the term through the figure of Bazarov the nihilist. "Fathers and Sons". Encyclopædia Britannica. Fathers and Sons concerns the inevitable conflict between generations and between the values of traditionalists and intellectuals. Edie, James M.; Scanlan, James; Zeldin, Mary-Barbara (1994). Russian Philosophy Volume II: the Nihilists, The Populists, Critics of Religion and Culture. University of Tennessee Press. p. 3. The "fathers" of the novel are full of humanitarian, progressive sentiments ... But to the "sons," typified by the brusque scientifically minded Bazarov, the "fathers" were concerned too much with generalities, not enough with the specific material evils of the day. ^ Frank, Joseph (1995). Dostoevsky: The Miraculous Years, 1865–1871. Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-01587-2. For it was Bazarov who had first declared himself to be a "Nihilist" and who announced that, "since at the present time, negation is the most useful of all," the Nihilists "deny—everything." ^ "Fathers and Sons". Encyclopædia Britannica. At the novel's first appearance, the radical younger generation attacked it bitterly as a slander, and conservatives condemned it as too lenient "Fathers and Sons". Novels for Students. Retrieved August 11, 2020 – via Encyclopedia.com. when he returned to Saint Petersburg in 1862 on the same day that young radicals—calling themselves "nihilists"—were setting fire to buildings ^ "Nihilism". Encyclopædia Britannica. originally a philosophy of moral and epistemological skepticism that arose in 19th-century Russia during the early years of the reign of Tsar Alexander II. Petrov, Kristian (2019). "'Strike out, right and left!': a conceptual-historical analysis of 1860s Russian nihilism and its notion of negation". Stud East Eur Thought. 71: 73–97. doi:10.1007/s11212-019-09319-4. Russian nihilism did not imply, as one might expect from a purely semantic viewpoint, a universal "negation" of ethical normativity, the foundations of knowledge or the meaningfulness of human existence. ^ Gillespie, Michael Allen (1996). Nihilism Before Nietzsche. University of Chicago Press. p. 139. ISBN 9780226293486. This nihilist movement was essentially Promethean"; "It has often been argued that Russian nihilism is little more than skepticism or empiricism. While there is a certain plausibility to this assertation, it ultimately fails to capture the millenarian zeal the characterized Russian nihilism. These nihilists were not skeptics but passionate advocates of negation and liberation. ^ Gillespie, Michael Allen (1996). Nihilism Before Nietzsche. University of Chicago Press. pp. 139, 143–144. ISBN 9780226293486. These nihilists were not skeptics but passionate advocates of negation and liberation."; "While the two leading nihilist groups disagreed on details, they both sought to liberate the Promethean might of the Russian people"; "The nihilists believed that the prototypes of this new Promethean humanity already existed in the cadre of the revolutionary movement itself. Petrov, Kristian (2019). "'Strike out, right and left!': a conceptual-historical analysis of 1860s Russian nihilism and its notion of negation". Stud East Eur Thought. 71: 73–97. doi:10.1007/s11212-019-09319-4. These "new types", to borrow Pisarev’s designation ^ Frank, Joseph (1995). Dostoevsky: The Miraculous Years, 1865–1871. Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-01587-2. ^ Petrov, Kristian (2019). "'Strike out, right and left!': a conceptual-historical analysis of 1860s Russian nihilism and its notion of negation". Stud East Eur Thought. 71: 73–97. doi:10.1007/s11212-019-09319-4. ^ Nishitani, Keiji (1990). McCormick, Peter J. (ed.). The Self-Overcoming of Nihilism. Translated by Graham Parkes; with Setsuko Aihara. State University of New York Press. p. 132. ISBN 0791404382. ^ F. Nietzsche, KSA 12:6 [25] ^ a b Michels, Steven. 2004. "Nietzsche, Nihilism, and the Virtue of Nature." Dogma. Archived from the original on 2004-10-31. ^ F. Nietzsche, KSA 12:10 [142] ^ F. Nietzsche, KSA 13:14 [22] ^ F. Nietzsche, KSA 12:5 [71] ^ F. Nietzsche, KSA 12:2 [200] ^ F. Nietzsche, KSA 12:2 [127] ^ Rosen, Stanley. 1969. Nihilism: A Philosophical Essay. New Haven: Yale University Press. p. xiii. ^ F. Nietzsche, The Gay Science: 125. ^ F. Nietzsche, On the Genealogy of Morals, III:7. ^ F. Nietzsche, KSA 12:7 [8] ^ F. Nietzsche, KSA 12:9 [35] ^ Doomen, J. 2012. "Consistent Nihilism." Journal of Mind and Behavior 33(1/2):103–17. ^ "Heideggers, Aus-einander-setzung' mit Nietzsches hat mannigfache Resonanz gefunden. Das Verhältnis der beiden Philosophen zueinander ist dabei von unterschiedlichen Positionen aus diskutiert worden. Inzwischen ist es nicht mehr ungewöhnlich, daß Heidegger, entgegen seinem Anspruch auf, Verwindung' der Metaphysik und des ihr zugehörigen Nihilismus, in jenen Nihilismus zurückgestellt wird, als dessen Vollender er Nietzsche angesehen hat." Wolfgang Müller-Lauter, Heidegger und Nietzsche. Nietzsche-Interpretationen III, Berlin-New York 2000, p. 303. ^ Cf. both by Heidegger: Vol. I, Nietzsche I (1936-39). Translated as Nietzsche I: The Will to Power as Art by David F. Krell (New York: Harper & Row, 1979); Vol. II, Nietzsche II (1939-46). Translated as "The Eternal Recurrence of the Same" by David F. Krell in Nietzsche II: The Eternal Recurrence of the Same (New York, Harper & Row, 1984). ^ "Indem Heidegger das von Nietzsche Ungesagte im Hinblick auf die Seinsfrage zur Sprache zu bringen sucht, wird das von Nietzsche Gesagte in ein diesem selber fremdes Licht gerückt.", Müller-Lauter, Heidegger und Nietzsche, p. 267. ^ Original German: Die seinsgeschichtliche Bestimmung des Nihilismus. Found in the second volume of his lectures: Vol. II, Nietzsche II (1939-46). Translated as "The Eternal Recurrence of the Same" by David F. Krell in Nietzsche II: The Eternal Recurrence of the Same (New York, Harper & Row, 1984). ^ "Heidegger geht davon aus, daß Nietzsche den Nihilismus als Entwertung der bisherigen obersten Werte versteht; seine Überwindung soll durch die Umwertung der Werte erfolgen. Das Prinzip der Umwertung wie auch jeder früheren Wertsetzung ist der Wille zur Macht.", Müller-Lauter, Heidegger und Nietzsche, p. 268. ^ "What remains unquestioned and forgotten in metaphysics is being; and hence, it is nihilistic.", UTM.edu Archived 2010-06-14 at the Wayback Machine, visited on November 24, 2009. ^ Müller-Lauter, Heidegger und Nietzsche, p. 268. ^ Müller-Lauter, Heidegger und Nietzsche, pp. 272-275. ^ Müller-Lauter, Heidegger und Nietzsche, pp. 301-303. ^ "Er (Vattimo) konstatiert, in vielen europäischen Philosophien eine Hin- und Herbewegung zwischen Heidegger und Nietzsche". Dabei denkt er, wie seine späteren Ausführungen zeigen, z.B. an Deleuze, Foucault und Derrida auf französischer Seite, an Cacciari, Severino und an sich selbst auf italienischer Seite.", Müller-Lauter, Heidegger und Nietzsche, p. 302. ^ Müller-Lauter, Heidegger und Nietzsche, pp. 303–304. ^ Deleuze, Gilles (1983) [1962]. Nietzsche and Philosophy. Translated by Tomlinson, Hugh. London: The Athlone Press. ISBN 978-0-231-13877-2. ^ Deleuze, Nietzsche and Philosophy, p.34. ^ Borginho, Jose Archived 2010-01-07 at the Wayback Machine 1999; Nihilism and Affirmation. Retrieved 05-12-07. ^ Spivak, Chakravorty Gayatri; 1988; Can The Subaltern Speak?; in Nelson, Cary and Grossberg, Lawrence (eds); 1988; Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture; Macmillan Education, Basingstoke. ^ Reynolds, Jack; 2001; The Other of Derridean Deconstruction: Levinas, Phenomenology and the Question of Responsibility Archived 2011-06-14 at the Wayback Machine; Minerva - An Internet Journal of Philosophy 5: 31–62. Retrieved 05-12-07. ^ "Nihilism". Encyclopædia Britannica. In the 20th century, nihilism encompassed a variety of philosophical and aesthetic stances that, in one sense or another, denied the existence of genuine moral truths or values, rejected the possibility of knowledge or communication, and asserted the ultimate meaninglessness or purposelessness of life or of the universe. ^ Crosby, Donald A. (1998). "Nihilism". Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Taylor and Francis. doi:10.4324/9780415249126-N037-1. ^ Turner, Jason. "Ontological Nihilism". Oxford University Press. Archived from the original on 2019-12-31. Retrieved 2019-12-31. ^ www.askoxford.com. "AskOxford: nihilism". Archived from the original on 2005-11-22.CS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown (link) ^ "nihilism". The American Heritage Medical Dictionary. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. 2008. p. 363. ISBN 978-0-618-94725-6. Archived from the original on 2016-09-11. Retrieved 2016-01-27. ^ "Solipsism and the Problem of Other Minds - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy". Archived from the original on 2015-10-31. Retrieved 2015-11-03. ^ Cooper, Neil (1973). "Moral Nihilism". Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 74 (1973–1974): 75–90. doi:10.1093/aristotelian/74.1.75. JSTOR 4544850. ^ "Friedrich Nietzsche § Nietzsche's Mature Philosophy". Encyclopædia Britannica. He thought of the age in which he lived as one of passive nihilism, that is, as an age that was not yet aware that religious and philosophical absolutes had dissolved in the emergence of 19th-century positivism. ^ Crosby, Donald A. (1998). "Nihilism". Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Taylor and Francis. doi:10.4324/9780415249126-N037-1. Political nihilism calls for the complete destruction of existing political institutions, along with their supporting outlooks and social structures, but has no positive message of what should be put in their place. ^ Strauss, Leo. 1999. "German Nihilism." Interpretation 26(3):353–378. ^ "Scientific Nihilism". www.sunypress.edu. Archived from the original on December 15, 2019. Retrieved Apr 7, 2020. ^ Stegenga, Jacob (2018). Medical Nihilism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. p. 1. ISBN 978-0-19-874704-8. ^ Smith, Richard (June 2018). "The case for medical nihilism and "gentle medicine"". The BMJ. ^ Danaher, John (April 12, 2019). "The Argument for Medical Nihilism". Philosophical Disquisitions. Retrieved September 4, 2019. ^ de Micheli, Mario (2006). Las vanguardias artísticas del siglo XX. Alianza Forma. pp. 135-137. ^ a b Tzara, Tristan (December 2005). Trans/ed. Mary Ann Caws "Approximate Man" & Other Writings. Black Widow Press, p. 3. ^ de Micheli, Mario (2006). Las vanguardias artísticas del siglo XX. Alianza Forma, p. 137. ^ "Nihilism". The University of Tennessee, Martin. April 1, 2012. Archived from the original on January 19, 2018. Retrieved January 16, 2018. ^ "Nihilism: Philosophy of Nothingness". January 5, 2015. Retrieved January 16, 2018. Sources[edit] Primary texts[edit] Brassier, Ray (2007) Nihil Unbound: Enlightenment and Extinction, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Jacobi, Friedrich Heinrich, Jacobi an Fichte (1799/1816), German Text (1799/1816), Appendix with Jacobi's and Fichte's complementary Texts, critical Apparatus, Commentary, and Italian Translation, Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Filosofici, Naples 2011, ISBN 978-88-905957-5-2. Heidegger, Martin (1982), Nietzsche, Vols. I-IV, trans. F.A. Capuzzi, San Francisco: Harper & Row. Kierkegaard, Søren (1998/1854), The Moment and Late Writings: Kierkegaard's Writings, Vol. 23, ed. and trans. Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong, Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-03226-9. Kierkegaard, Søren (1978/1846), The Two Ages : Kierkegaard's Writings, Vol 14, ed. and trans. Howard V. Hong, and Edna H. Hong, Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-07226-5. —— (1995/1850), Works of Love : Kierkegaard's Writings, Vol 16, ed. and trans. Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong, Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-03792-9. Nietzsche, Friedrich (2005/1886), Beyond Good and Evil, trans. Helen Zimmern. —— (1974/1887), The Gay Science, trans. Walter Kaufman, Vintage, ISBN 0-394-71985-9. —— (1980), Sämtliche Werken. Kritische Studienausgabe, ed. C. Colli and M. Montinari, Walter de Gruyter. ISBN 3-11-007680-2. —— (2008/1885), Thus Spake Zarathustra, trans. Thomas Common. Tartaglia, James (2016), Philosophy in a Meaningless Life: A System of Nihilism, Consciousness and Reality, London: Bloomsbury Publishing. Secondary texts[edit] Arena, Leonardo Vittorio (1997), Del nonsense: tra Oriente e Occidente, Urbino: Quattroventi. —— (2012), Nonsense as the Meaning, ebook. —— (2015), On Nudity. An Introduction to Nonsense, Mimesis International. Barnett, Christopher (2011), Kierkegaard, pietism and holiness, Ashgate Publishing. Carr, Karen (1992), The Banalisation of Nihilism, State University of New York Press. Cattarini, L.S. (2018), Beyond Sartre and Sterility: Surviving Existentialism (Montreal: contact argobookshop.ca) Cunningham, Conor (2002), Genealogy of Nihilism: Philosophies of Nothing & the Difference of Theology, New York, NY: Routledge. Dent, G., Wallace, M., & Dia Center for the Arts. (1992). "Black popular culture" (Discussions in contemporary culture ; no. 8). Seattle: Bay Press. Dod, Elmar (2013), Der unheimlichste Gast. Die Philosophie des Nihilismus. Marburg: Tectum 2013. Dreyfus, Hubert L. (2004), Kierkegaard on the Internet: Anonymity vs. Commitment in the Present Age. Retrieved at December 1, 2009. Fraser, John (2001), "Nihilism, Modernisn and Value", retrieved at December 2, 2009. Galimberti, Umberto (2008), L'ospite inquietante. Il nichilismo e i giovani, Milano: Feltrinelli. ISBN 9788807171437. Gillespie, Michael Allen (1996), Nihilism Before Nietzsche, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Giovanni, George di (2008), "Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.). Retrieved on December 1, 2009. Harper, Douglas, "Nihilism", in: Online Etymology Dictionary, retrieved at December 2, 2009. Harries, Karsten (2010), Between nihilism and faith: a commentary on Either/or, Walter de Gruyter Press. Hibbs, Thomas S. (2000), Shows About Nothing: Nihilism in Popular Culture from The Exorcist to Seinfeld, Dallas, TX: Spence Publishing Company. Kopić, Mario (2001), S Nietzscheom o Europi, Zagreb: Jesenski i Turk. Korab-Karpowicz, W. J. (2005), "Martin Heidegger (1889—1976)", in: Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, retrieved at December 2, 2009. Kuhn, Elisabeth (1992), Friedrich Nietzsches Philosophie des europäischen Nihilismus, Walter de Gruyter. Irti, Natalino (2004), Nichilismo giuridico, Laterza, Roma-Bari. Löwith, Karl (1995), Martin Heidegger and European Nihilism, New York, NY: Columbia UP. Marmysz, John (2003), Laughing at Nothing: Humor as a Response to Nihilism, Albany, NY: SUNY Press. Müller-Lauter, Wolfgang (2000), Heidegger und Nietzsche. Nietzsche-Interpretationen III, Berlin-New York. Parvez Manzoor, S. (2003), "Modernity and Nihilism. Secular History and Loss of Meaning", retrieved at December 2, 2009. Rose, Eugene Fr. Seraphim (1995), Nihilism, The Root of the Revolution of the Modern Age, Forestville, CA: Fr. Seraphim Rose Foundation. Rosen, Stanley (2000), Nihilism: A Philosophical Essay, South Bend, Indiana: St. Augustine's Press (2nd Edition). Severino, Emanuele (1982), Essenza del nichilismo, Milano: Adelphi. ISBN 9788845904899. Slocombe, Will (2006), Nihilism and the Sublime Postmodern: The (Hi)Story of a Difficult Relationship, New York, NY: Routledge. Tigani, Francesco (2010), Rappresentare Medea. Dal mito al nichilismo, Roma: Aracne. ISBN 978-88-548-3256-5. —— (2014), Lo spettro del nulla e il corpo del nichilismo, in La nave di Teseo. Saggi sull'Essere, il mito e il potere, Napoli: Guida. ISBN 9788868660499. Villet, Charles (2009), Towards Ethical Nihilism: The Possibility of Nietzschean Hope, Saarbrücken: Verlag Dr. Müller. Williams, Peter S. (2005), I Wish I Could Believe in Meaning: A Response to Nihilism, Damaris Publishing. External links[edit] Look up nihilism in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. Wikiquote has quotations related to: Nihilism Wikimedia Commons has media related to Nihilism. Nihilist Abyss (in Italian) Friedrich Nietzsche, Thus Spake Zarathustra, translated by Thomas Common "Nihilism" in the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy Fathers and Sons by Ivan Turgenev "Moral Skepticism", section "Skeptical Hypotheses" in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy "Nihilism" . New International Encyclopedia. 1905. "In the Dust of This Planet", Radiolab podcast on nihilism and popular culture "Nihilism", In Our Time, BBC Radio 4 discussion with Rob Hopkins, Raymond Tallis and Catherine Belsey (Nov. 16, 2000) v t e List of political ideologies Anti-establishment Centrism Hardline Left-wing politics Reactionary Revolutionary Right-wing politics The Establishment Anarchism Capitalism Christian democracy Collectivism Colonialism Communalism Communism Communitarianism Conservatism Constitutionalism Democracy Distributism Environmentalism Extremism Fanaticism Fascism Feminism Fundamentalism Globalism Green Hindu nationalism (Hindutva) Imperialism Individualism Industrialism Intellectualism Internationalism Liberalism Libertarianism Masculism Militarism Monarchism Nationalism Nihilism Political aspects of Islam Islamism Political radicalism Populism Progressive conservatism Progressivism Reformism Republicanism Royalism Social anarchism Social credit Social democracy Socialism Statism Syncretism Third Way Utilitarianism v t e Philosophy Branches Traditional Metaphysics Epistemology Logic Ethics Aesthetics Philosophy of... Action Color Culture Design Music Film Cosmology Education Environment Geography Happiness History Human nature Humor Feminism Language Law Life Literature Mathematics Medicine Healthcare Psychiatry Mind Pain Psychology Perception Philosophy Religion Science Physics Chemistry Biology Sexuality Social science Business Culture Economics Politics Society Space and time Sport Technology Artificial intelligence Computer science Engineering Information War Schools of thought By era Ancient Western Medieval Renaissance Early modern Modern Contemporary Ancient Chinese Agriculturalism Confucianism Legalism Logicians Mohism Chinese naturalism Neotaoism Taoism Yangism Chan Greco-Roman Aristotelianism Atomism Cynicism Cyrenaics Eleatics Eretrian school Epicureanism Hermeneutics Ionian Ephesian Milesian Megarian school Neoplatonism Peripatetic Platonism Pluralism Presocratic Pyrrhonism Pythagoreanism Neopythagoreanism Sophistic Stoicism Indian Hindu Samkhya Nyaya Vaisheshika Yoga Mīmāṃsā Ājīvika Ajñana Cārvāka Jain Anekantavada Syādvāda Buddhist Śūnyatā Madhyamaka Yogacara Sautrāntika Svatantrika Persian Mazdakism Mithraism Zoroastrianism Zurvanism Medieval European Christian Augustinianism Scholasticism Thomism Scotism Occamism Renaissance humanism East Asian Korean Confucianism Edo neo-Confucianism Neo-Confucianism Indian Vedanta Acintya bheda abheda Advaita Bhedabheda Dvaita Nimbarka Sampradaya Shuddhadvaita Vishishtadvaita Navya-Nyāya Islamic Averroism Avicennism Illuminationism ʿIlm al-Kalām Sufi Jewish Judeo-Islamic Modern People Cartesianism Kantianism Neo-Kantianism Hegelianism Marxism Spinozism 0 Anarchism Classical Realism Liberalism Collectivism Conservatism Determinism Dualism Empiricism Existentialism Foundationalism Historicism Holism Humanism Anti- Idealism Absolute British German Objective Subjective Transcendental Individualism Kokugaku Materialism Modernism Monism Naturalism Natural law Nihilism New Confucianism Neo-scholasticism Pragmatism Phenomenology Positivism Reductionism Rationalism Social contract Socialism Transcendentalism Utilitarianism Contemporary Analytic Applied ethics Analytic feminism Analytical Marxism Communitarianism Consequentialism Critical rationalism Experimental philosophy Falsificationism Foundationalism / Coherentism Internalism and externalism Logical positivism Legal positivism Normative ethics Meta-ethics Moral realism Quinean naturalism Ordinary language philosophy Postanalytic philosophy Quietism Rawlsian Reformed epistemology Systemics Scientism Scientific realism Scientific skepticism Transactionalism Contemporary utilitarianism Vienna Circle Wittgensteinian Continental Critical theory Deconstruction Existentialism Feminist Frankfurt School New Historicism Hermeneutics Neo-Marxism Phenomenology Posthumanism Postmodernism Post-structuralism Social constructionism Structuralism Western Marxism Other Kyoto School Objectivism Postcritique Russian cosmism more... Positions Aesthetics Formalism Institutionalism Aesthetic response Ethics Consequentialism Deontology Virtue Free will Compatibilism Determinism Hard Incompatibilism Hard Libertarianism Metaphysics Atomism Dualism Idealism Monism Naturalism Realism Epistemology Empiricism Fideism Naturalism Particularism Rationalism Skepticism Solipsism Mind Behaviorism Emergentism Eliminativism Epiphenomenalism Functionalism Objectivism Subjectivism Normativity Absolutism Particularism Relativism Nihilism Skepticism Universalism Ontology Action Event Process Reality Anti-realism Conceptualism Idealism Materialism Naturalism Nominalism Physicalism Realism By region Related lists Miscellaneous By region African Ethiopian Amerindian Aztec Eastern Chinese Egyptian Indian Indonesian Iranian Japanese Korean Pakistani Vietnamese Middle Eastern Western American Australian British Czech Danish French German Greek Italian Polish Romanian Russian Slovene Spanish Turkish Lists Outline Index Years Problems Schools Glossary Philosophers Movements Publications Miscellaneous Natural law Sage Theoretical philosophy / Practical philosophy Women in philosophy Portal Category Book v t e Metaphysics Metaphysicians Parmenides Plato Aristotle Plotinus Duns Scotus Thomas Aquinas Francisco Suárez Nicolas Malebranche René Descartes John Locke David Hume Thomas Reid Immanuel Kant Isaac Newton Arthur Schopenhauer Baruch Spinoza Georg W. F. Hegel George Berkeley Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Christian Wolff Bernard Bolzano Hermann Lotze Henri Bergson Friedrich Nietzsche Charles Sanders Peirce Joseph Maréchal Ludwig Wittgenstein Martin Heidegger Alfred N. Whitehead Bertrand Russell G. E. Moore Jean-Paul Sartre Gilbert Ryle Hilary Putnam P. F. Strawson R. G. Collingwood Rudolf Carnap Saul Kripke W. V. O. Quine G. E. M. Anscombe Donald Davidson Michael Dummett D. M. Armstrong David Lewis Alvin Plantinga Héctor-Neri Castañeda Peter van Inwagen Derek Parfit Alexius Meinong Ernst Mally Edward N. Zalta more ... Theories Abstract object theory Action theory Anti-realism Determinism Dualism Enactivism Essentialism Existentialism Free will Idealism Libertarianism Liberty Materialism Meaning of life Monism Naturalism Nihilism Phenomenalism Realism Physicalism Platonic idealism Relativism Scientific realism Solipsism Subjectivism Substance theory Truthmaker theory Type theory Concepts Abstract object Anima mundi Being Category of being Causality Causal closure Choice Cogito, ergo sum Concept Embodied cognition Essence Existence Experience Hypostatic abstraction Idea Identity Information Insight Intelligence Intention Linguistic modality Matter Meaning Memetics Mental representation Mind Motion Nature Necessity Notion Object Pattern Perception Physical object Principle Property Qualia Quality Reality Relation Soul Subject Substantial form Thought Time Truth Type–token distinction Universal Unobservable Value more ... Related topics Axiology Cosmology Epistemology Feminist metaphysics Interpretations of quantum mechanics Mereology Meta- Ontology Philosophy of mind Philosophy of psychology Philosophy of self Philosophy of space and time Teleology Theoretical physics Category  Philosophy portal Authority control GND: 4042306-2 LCCN: sh85091922 NDL: 00568157 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nihilism&oldid=996332389" Categories: Nihilism Ethical theories Metaphysical theories Philosophy of life Political ideologies Hidden categories: Webarchive template wayback links CS1 Italian-language sources (it) CS1 German-language sources (de) CS1 maint: extra text: authors list CS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata Articles containing French-language text Articles to be expanded from October 2020 All articles to be expanded Articles containing Latin-language text Articles containing German-language text Articles containing Russian-language text Wikipedia articles needing clarification from December 2015 All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from April 2018 Articles with unsourced statements from September 2012 Wikipedia articles needing page number citations from May 2012 Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases from April 2018 All articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases Commons category link from Wikidata Articles with Italian-language sources (it) Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the New International Encyclopedia Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with NDL identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikiquote Languages Afrikaans العربية Արեւմտահայերէն Asturianu Azərbaycanca Banjar Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ Български Bosanski Català Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français Gaeilge Galego 贛語 한국어 Հայերեն हिन्दी Hrvatski Bahasa Indonesia Íslenska Italiano עברית ಕನ್ನಡ ქართული Қазақша Kurdî Кыргызча Latina Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Македонски മലയാളം მარგალური مصرى Bahasa Melayu Nederlands Nedersaksies 日本語 Norsk bokmål Norsk nynorsk Occitan Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча ਪੰਜਾਬੀ Patois Polski Português Română Русиньскый Русский Scots Shqip Simple English سنڌي Slovenčina کوردی Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Tagalog தமிழ் Türkçe Українська Tiếng Việt 吴语 粵語 Zazaki 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 25 December 2020, at 23:40 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-271 ---- Valerius Maximus - Wikipedia Valerius Maximus From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search early 1st century AD Roman professional rhetorician, historian and author Page from an incunable of Valerius Maximus, Facta et dicta memorabilia, printed in red and black by Peter Schöffer (Mainz, 1471) Valerius Maximus (/vəˈlɪəriəs ˈmæksɪməs/) was a 1st-century Latin writer and author of a collection of historical anecdotes: Factorum ac dictorum memorabilium libri IX ("Nine books of memorable deeds and sayings", also known as De factis dictisque memorabilibus or Facta et dicta memorabilia). He worked during the reign of Tiberius (14 AD to 37 AD). During the Middle Ages, Valerius Maximus was one of the most copied Latin prose authors, second only to Priscian. More than 600 medieval manuscripts of his books have survived as a result.[1] Contents 1 Biography 2 Style 3 Legacy 4 Editions and translations 5 References 6 Bibliography 7 External links Biography[edit] Nothing is known of his life except that his family was poor and undistinguished, and that he owed everything to Sextus Pompeius (consul AD 14),[2] proconsul of Asia, whom he accompanied to the East in 27. Pompeius was the center of a literary circle to which Ovid belonged; he was also an intimate friend of the most literary prince of the imperial family, Germanicus.[3] Although he shared the same name as a prestigious family of the Republic, John Briscoe says "it is unlikely in the extreme" that Valerius Maximus belonged to the patrician Valerii Maximi. He suggests instead that he was either a descendant of the plebeian Valerii Tappones or Triarii, or earned the Roman citizenship thanks to the patronage of a Valerius of the Republic.[4] His attitude towards the imperial household is controversial: he has been represented as a mean flatterer of Tiberius,[5] of the same type as Martial. Chisholm in 1911 argued however that, if the references to the imperial administration are carefully scanned, they will be seen to be extravagant neither in kind nor in number: few will now grudge Tiberius, when his whole action as a ruler is taken into account, such a title as salutaris princeps, which seemed to a former generation a specimen of shameless adulation. A quarter of a century later still, however, H J Rose claimed that Valerius “cares nothing for historical truth if by neglecting it he can flatter Tiberius, which he does most fulsomely”.[6] Chisholm also maintained that the few allusions to Caesar's murderers and to Augustus hardly pass beyond the conventional style of the writer's day; and that the only passage which can fairly be called fulsome is the violently rhetorical tirade against Sejanus.[3] Style[edit] The style of Valerius's writings seems to indicate that he was a professional rhetorician; and his writing represents much of the worst rhetorical tendencies of the Silver Latin age. Direct and simple statement is avoided and novelty pursued at any price, producing a clumsy obscurity.[7] The diction is like that of poetry; the uses of words are strained; metaphors are invented; there are startling contrasts, innuendoes and epithets; variations are played upon grammatical and rhetorical figures of speech.[3] In his preface, Valerius intimates that his work is intended as a commonplace book of historical anecdotes for use in the schools of rhetoric, where the pupils were trained in the art of embellishing speeches by references to history. According to the manuscripts, its title is Factorum ac dictorum memorabilium libri IX (shorter title Facta et dicta memorabilia), "Nine Books of Memorable Deeds and Sayings." The stories are loosely and irregularly arranged, each book being divided into sections, and each section bearing as its title the topic, most commonly some virtue or vice, or some merit or demerit, which the stories in the section are intended to illustrate.[3] Most of the tales are from Roman history, but each section has an appendix consisting of extracts from the annals of other peoples, principally the Greeks. The exposition exhibits strongly the two currents of feeling which are intermingled by almost every Roman writer of the Empire—the feeling that the Romans of the writer's own day are degenerate creatures when confronted with their own republican predecessors, and the feeling that, however degenerate, the latter-day Romans still tower above the other peoples of the world, and in particular are morally superior to the Greeks.[3] The author's chief sources are Cicero, Livy, Sallust and Pompeius Trogus, especially the first two.[8] Valerius's treatment of his material is careless and inaccurate in the extreme;[9] but in spite of his confusions, contradictions and anachronisms, the excerpts are apt illustrations, from the rhetorician's point of view, of the circumstance or quality they were intended to illustrate.[10] And even on the historical side we owe something to Valerius. He often used sources now lost, and where he touches on his own time he affords us some glimpses of the much debated and very imperfectly recorded reign of Tiberius;[3] as well as some fragmentary information on Hellenistic art;[11] and a revealing glimpse into the early imperial consensus on the need for the orderly logic and stability of the ancient Roman religion, in a politically unsettled world.[12] Legacy[edit] Simon de Hesdin presents his translation of Valerius Maximus' 'Facta et dicta memorabilia' to Charles V, king of France The collection of Valerius was much used for school purposes, and its popularity in the Middle Ages is attested by the large number of manuscripts in which it has been preserved: indeed, B. G. Niebuhr went so far as to claim that it was then “the most important book next to the Bible”.[13] Like other schoolbooks it was epitomised: one complete epitome, probably of the 4th or 5th century, bearing the name of Julius Paris, has come down to us; also a portion of another by Januarius Nepotianus [fr].[14] Only in the Renaissance, however, did it enter the central Latin curriculum in unabridged form, and it is then that its influence was arguably at its peak.[15] Dante for example used Valerius for details in his account of the generosity and modesty of Pisistratus.[16]< Although in the manuscripts of Valerius a tenth book is given, which consists of the so-called Liber de Praenominibus, this is the work of some grammarian of a much later date.[17] Editions and translations[edit] Editions by C. Halm (1865), C. Kempf (1888), contain the epitomes of Paris and Nepotianus.[3] New editions have been produced by R. Combès (1995-) with a French translation, J. Briscoe (1998), and D.R. Shackleton Baily (2000) with an English translation. Recent discussions of Valerius' work include W. Martin Bloomer, Valerius Maximus and the Rhetoric of the New Nobility (Chapel Hill, 1992), Clive Skidmore, Practical Ethics for Roman Gentlemen: the Work of Valerius Maximus (Exeter, 1996), and Hans-Friedrich Mueller, Roman Religion in Valerius Maximus (London, 2002). A translation into Dutch was published in 1614,[18] and was read by Rembrandt and other artists (and their patrons), stimulating interest in some new subjects such as Artemisia drinking her husband's ashes.[19] 600 manuscripts of Valerius have survived, 800 when counting epitomes, more than any other Latin prose writer after the grammarian Priscian. Most manuscripts date from the late Middle Ages, but 30 predates the 12th century.[1] The three oldest manuscripts are the authoritative sources for the text: Burgerbibliothek, Bern, Switzerland, n°366 (manuscript A). Laurentian Library, Florence, Italy, Ashburnham 1899 (manuscript L). Both A and L were written in northern France in the 9th century and share a common source. Royal Library, Brussels, Belgium, n°5336 (manuscript G). It was probably written at the Gembloux Abbey (south of Brussels) in the 11th century. Briscoe says that G has a different parent from A and L, as several mistakes shared by A and L are not found in G.[20] References[edit] ^ a b Briscoe, Valerius Maximus, p. 15. ^ H J Rose, A Handbook of Latin Literature (London 1966) p. 356 ^ a b c d e f g Chisholm 1911. ^ Briscoe, Valerius Maximus, p. 1. ^ H Nettleship, A Dictionary of Classical Antiquities (London 1891) p. 664 ^ H J Rose, A Handbook of Latin Literature (London 1966) p. 356 ^ H J Rose, A Handbook of Latin Literature (London 1966) p. 356 ^ H Nettleship, A Dictionary of Classical Antiquities (London 1891) p. 664 ^ H J Rose, A Handbook of Latin Literature (London 1966) p. 356 ^ Reading for the moral in Valerius Maximus ^ J Boardman ed, The Oxford History of the Classical World (1986) p. 495 ^ H-F Mueller, Roman Religion in Valerius Maximus (2002) p. 2 and p. 118 ^ Quoted in M Crab, Exemplary Reading (2015) p. 1 ^ H J Rose, A Handbook of Latin Literature (London 1966) p. 356 ^ M Crab, Exemplary Reading (2015) p. 2-3 ^ Dante, Purgatory (Penguin 1971) p. 187 ^ H J Rose, A Handbook of Latin Literature (London 1966) p. 357 ^ Valerii Maximi Des alder-vermaertsten ende welsprekensten Histori-schryvers Negen Boecken, Van ghedenck-Weerdighe / loflicke woorden / daden ende gheschiedenissen der Romeynen en de uytlansche volcken. Overgheset uyt de Latijnsche in onse Nederduytsche tale door Conradum Mirkinium. Tot Rotterdam, By Jan Leendertsz. Berewout / Boeckverkooper op de Hoogh-straet int Schrijfboeck. 1614. Available at https://books.google.nl/books/about/Des_alder_vermaertsten_ende_wel_sprekens.html?id=sfKtoECJbq8C&redir_esc=y ^ Golahny, Amy, Rembrandt's Reading: The Artist's Bookshelf of Ancient Poetry and History, pp. 129-133, 2003, Amsterdam University Press, ISBN 9053566090, 9789053566091 ^ Briscoe, Valerius Maximus, pp. 15–21. Attribution:  This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Valerius Maximus". Encyclopædia Britannica. 27 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 860. Bibliography[edit] Bloomer, W. Martin. Valerius Maximus and the Rhetoric of the New Nobility. University of North Carolina Press: Chapel Hill, 1992. Briscoe, John. "Some Notes on Valerius Maximus." Sileno 19: 398–402, 1993. ——, Valerius Maximus, Facta Et Dicta Memorabilia, Book 8: Text, Introduction, and Commentary, Berlin/Boston, de Gruyter, 2019. Farrell, Joseph. "The Poverty of Our Ancestral Speech." Latin Language and Latin Culture from Ancient to Modern Times. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. Guerrini, Roberto. Studi su Valerio Massimo. Pisa, Italy: Giardini, 1981. Holford-Strevens, Leofranc. “Getting Away with Murder: The Literary and Forensic Fortune of Two Roman ‘Exempla.’” International Journal of the Classical Tradition, vol. 7, no. 4, 2001, pp. 489–514. Ker, James. “Roman Repraesentatio.” The American Journal of Philology, vol. 128, no. 3, 2007, pp. 341–365. Koster, Isabel K. “How to Kill a Roman Villain: The Deaths of Quintus Pleminus.” The Classical Journal, vol. 109, no. 3, 2014, pp. 309–332. Lennon, Jack. “Dining and Obligation in Valerius Maximus: The Case of the Sacra Mensae.” The Classical Quarterly, vol. 65, no. 2, 2015, pp. 719–731. Lobur, John Alexander. Consensus, Concordia and the Formation of Roman Imperial Ideology, Routledge, 2008 (chapter six). Mueller, Hans-Friedrich. Roman Religion in Valerius Maximus. Routledge: London, 2002. Nguyen, V. Henry T. Christian Identity in Corinth: A Comparative Study of 2 Corinthians, Epictetus and Valerius Maximus. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament. 2. Reihe 243. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2008. Skidmore, Clive. Practical Ethics for Roman Gentlemen: The Work of Valerius Maximus. University of Exeter Press: Exeter, 1996. Vorobyova, Nataliya. "Valerius Maximus: Moral Exempla in Kierkegaard’s Writings" in Kierkegaard and the Roman World edited by Jon Bartley Stewart. Ashgate: Farnham, 2009. Wardle, David. “Valerius Maximus and the End of the First Punic War.” Latomus, vol. 64, no. 2, 2005, pp. 377–384. Wardle, David. The Sainted Julius: Valerius Maximus and the Dictator. Classical Philology 92:323–345, 1997. Wardle, David. Valerius Maximus' Memorable Deeds and Sayings: Book 1. Oxford University Press (Clarendon Ancient History Series): Oxford and New York, 1998. Welch, Tara S. "Was Valerius Maximus a Hack?" American Journal of Philology 134:67–82, 2013. External links[edit] Wikimedia Commons has media related to Valerius Maximus. Wikisource has original works written by or about: Valerius Maximus Wikisource has original text related to this article: Translation:Liber de Praenominibus Library resources about Valerius Maximus Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries By Valerius Maximus Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries Works by Valerius Maximus at Perseus Digital Library (in Latin) VALERI MAXIMI FACTORVM ET DICTORVM MEMORABILIVM LIBRI NOVEM at The Latin Library, his most famous work, often quoted by orators of the time. Sheridan, Paul (2015-09-19). "Selected Anecdotes by Valerius Maximus". Anecdotes from Antiquity. Retrieved 2015-09-19. Authority control BNE: XX1142330 BNF: cb12043057z (data) CANTIC: a20064573 CiNii: DA08222913 GND: 118625969 ISNI: 0000 0001 1562 7488 LCCN: n82097560 LNB: 000009682 NKC: ola2002161393 NLA: 36580585 NLG: 79188 NLP: A11861769 NSK: 000085153 NTA: 069823685 RERO: 02-A000169721 RSL: 000008655 SELIBR: 208828 SNAC: w6wm2jbz SUDOC: 028635140 Trove: 1304221 ULAN: 500355327 VIAF: 44316768 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n82097560 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Valerius_Maximus&oldid=993874425" Categories: Latin historians Silver Age Latin writers 1st-century Romans 1st-century historians Valerii Hidden categories: Articles with short description Short description matches Wikidata Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica with Wikisource reference Wikipedia articles incorporating text from the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica Commons category link from Wikidata Articles with Latin-language sources (la) Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CANTIC identifiers Wikipedia articles with CINII identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with LNB identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLG identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLP identifiers Wikipedia articles with NSK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with RERO identifiers Wikipedia articles with RSL identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SNAC-ID identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with Trove identifiers Wikipedia articles with ULAN identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Year of birth unknown Year of death unknown Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikisource Languages Afrikaans Asturianu Български Brezhoneg Català Čeština Deutsch Español Estremeñu Euskara Français Furlan 한국어 Bahasa Indonesia Íslenska Italiano עברית Latina Magyar Nederlands Polski Português Русский Shqip Slovenčina Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Українська 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 12 December 2020, at 23:21 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2724 ---- Roman law - Wikipedia Roman law From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Legal system of Ancient Rome (c. 449 BC – AD 529) Ancient Rome This article is part of a series on the politics and government of ancient Rome Periods Roman Kingdom 753–509 BC Roman Republic 509–27 BC Roman Empire 27 BC – AD 395 Principate 27 BC – AD 284 Dominate AD 284–641 Western AD 395–476 Eastern AD 395–1453 Timeline Roman Constitution Constitution of the Kingdom Constitution of the Republic Constitution of the Empire Constitution of the Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Executive magistrates Precedent and law Roman law Ius Imperium Mos maiorum Collegiality Auctoritas Roman citizenship Cursus honorum Senatus consultum Senatus consultum ultimum Assemblies Centuriate Curiate Plebeian Tribal Ordinary magistrates Consul Praetor Quaestor Promagistrate Aedile Tribune Censor Governor Extraordinary magistrates Corrector Dictator Magister equitum Consular tribune Rex Triumviri Decemviri Titles and honours Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Praeses Praefectus Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Other countries v t e Roman law is the legal system of ancient Rome, including the legal developments spanning over a thousand years of jurisprudence, from the Twelve Tables (c. 449 BC), to the Corpus Juris Civilis (AD 529) ordered by Eastern Roman Emperor Justinian I. Roman law forms the basic framework for civil law, the most widely used legal system today, and the terms are sometimes used synonymously. The historical importance of Roman law is reflected by the continued use of Latin legal terminology in many legal systems influenced by it, including common law. After the dissolution of the Western Roman Empire, the Roman law remained in effect in the Eastern Roman Empire. From the 7th century onward, the legal language in the East was Greek. Roman law also denoted the legal system applied in most of Western Europe until the end of the 18th century. In Germany, Roman law practice remained in place longer under the Holy Roman Empire (963–1806). Roman law thus served as a basis for legal practice throughout Western continental Europe, as well as in most former colonies of these European nations, including Latin America, and also in Ethiopia. English and Anglo-American common law were influenced also by Roman law, notably in their Latinate legal glossary (for example, stare decisis, culpa in contrahendo, pacta sunt servanda).[1] Eastern Europe was also influenced by the jurisprudence of the Corpus Juris Civilis, especially in countries such as medieval Romania (Wallachia, Moldavia, and some other medieval provinces/historical regions) which created a new system, a mixture of Roman and local law. Also, Eastern European law was influenced by the "Farmer's Law" of the medieval Byzantine legal system. Contents 1 Development 1.1 Twelve Tables 1.2 Early law and jurisprudence 1.3 Pre-classical period 1.4 Classical Roman law 1.5 Post-classical law 2 Substance 2.1 Concept of laws 2.2 Public law 2.3 Private law 2.4 Status 2.5 Litigation 3 Legacy 3.1 In the East 3.2 In the West 3.3 Today 4 See also 5 References 6 Sources 7 Further reading 8 External links Development Before the Twelve Tables (754–449 BC), private law comprised the Roman civil law (ius civile Quiritium) that applied only to Roman citizens, and was bonded to religion; undeveloped, with attributes of strict formalism, symbolism, and conservatism, e.g. the ritual practice of mancipatio (a form of sale). The jurist Sextus Pomponius said, "At the beginning of our city, the people began their first activities without any fixed law, and without any fixed rights: all things were ruled despotically, by kings".[2] It is believed that Roman Law is rooted in the Etruscan religion, emphasizing ritual.[3] Twelve Tables Main article: Twelve Tables The first legal text is the Law of the Twelve Tables, dating from the mid-5th century BC. The plebeian tribune, C. Terentilius Arsa, proposed that the law should be written in order to prevent magistrates from applying the law arbitrarily.[4] After eight years of political struggle, the plebeian social class convinced the patricians to send a delegation to Athens to copy the Laws of Solon; they also dispatched delegations to other Greek cities for like reason.[4] In 451 BC, according to the traditional story (as Livy tells it), ten Roman citizens were chosen to record the laws, known as the decemviri legibus scribundis. While they were performing this task, they were given supreme political power (imperium), whereas the power of the magistrates was restricted.[4] In 450 BC, the decemviri produced the laws on ten tablets (tabulae), but these laws were regarded as unsatisfactory by the plebeians. A second decemvirate is said to have added two further tablets in 449 BC. The new Law of the Twelve Tables was approved by the people's assembly.[4] Modern scholars tend to challenge the accuracy of Roman historians. They generally do not believe that a second decemvirate ever took place. The decemvirate of 451 is believed to have included the most controversial points of customary law, and to have assumed the leading functions in Rome.[4] Furthermore, questions concerning Greek influence on early Roman Law are still much discussed. Many scholars consider it unlikely that the patricians sent an official delegation to Greece, as the Roman historians believed. Instead, those scholars suggest, the Romans acquired Greek legislations from the Greek cities of Magna Graecia, the main portal between the Roman and Greek worlds.[4] The original text of the Twelve Tables has not been preserved. The tablets were probably destroyed when Rome was conquered and burned by the Gauls in 387 BC.[4] The fragments which did survive show that it was not a law code in the modern sense. It did not provide a complete and coherent system of all applicable rules or give legal solutions for all possible cases. Rather, the tables contained specific provisions designed to change the then-existing customary law. Although the provisions pertain to all areas of law, the largest part is dedicated to private law and civil procedure. Early law and jurisprudence Main articles: Lex Canuleia, Lex Hortensia, and Lex Aquilia Many laws include Lex Canuleia (445 BC; which allowed the marriage—ius connubii—between patricians and plebeians), Leges Licinae Sextiae (367 BC; which made restrictions on possession of public lands—ager publicus—and also made sure that one of the consuls was plebeian), Lex Ogulnia (300 BC; plebeians received access to priest posts), and Lex Hortensia (287 BC; verdicts of plebeian assemblies—plebiscita—now bind all people). Another important statute from the Republican era is the Lex Aquilia of 286 BC, which may be regarded as the root of modern tort law. However, Rome's most important contribution to European legal culture was not the enactment of well-drafted statutes, but the emergence of a class of professional jurists (prudentes, sing. prudens, or jurisprudentes) and of a legal science. This was achieved in a gradual process of applying the scientific methods of Greek philosophy to the subject of law, a subject which the Greeks themselves never treated as a science. Traditionally, the origins of Roman legal science are connected to Gnaeus Flavius. Flavius is said to have published around the year 300 BC the formularies containing the words which had to be spoken in court to begin a legal action. Before the time of Flavius, these formularies are said to have been secret and known only to the priests. Their publication made it possible for non-priests to explore the meaning of these legal texts. Whether or not this story is credible, jurists were active and legal treatises were written in larger numbers before the 2nd century BC. Among the famous jurists of the republican period are Quintus Mucius Scaevola who wrote a voluminous treatise on all aspects of the law, which was very influential in later times, and Servius Sulpicius Rufus, a friend of Marcus Tullius Cicero. Thus, Rome had developed a very sophisticated legal system and a refined legal culture when the Roman republic was replaced by the monarchical system of the principate in 27 BC. Pre-classical period In the period between about 201 to 27 BC, we can see the development of more flexible laws to match the needs of the time. In addition to the old and formal ius civile a new juridical class is created: the ius honorarium, which can be defined as "The law introduced by the magistrates who had the right to promulgate edicts in order to support, supplement or correct the existing law."[5] With this new law the old formalism is being abandoned and new more flexible principles of ius gentium are used. The adaptation of law to new needs was given over to juridical practice, to magistrates, and especially to the praetors. A praetor was not a legislator and did not technically create new law when he issued his edicts (magistratuum edicta). In fact, the results of his rulings enjoyed legal protection (actionem dare) and were in effect often the source of new legal rules. A Praetor's successor was not bound by the edicts of his predecessor; however, he did take rules from edicts of his predecessor that had proved to be useful. In this way a constant content was created that proceeded from edict to edict (edictum traslatitium). Thus, over the course of time, parallel to the civil law and supplementing and correcting it, a new body of praetoric law emerged. In fact, praetoric law was so defined by the famous Roman jurist Papinian (142–212 AD): "Ius praetorium est quod praetores introduxerunt adiuvandi vel supplendi vel corrigendi iuris civilis gratia propter utilitatem publicam" ("praetoric law is that law introduced by praetors to supplement or correct civil law for public benefit"). Ultimately, civil law and praetoric law were fused in the Corpus Juris Civilis. Classical Roman law Main articles: Gaius (jurist), Ulpian, Papinian, Julius Paulus Prudentissimus, and Herennius Modestinus The first 250 years of the current era are the period during which Roman law and Roman legal science reached its greatest degree of sophistication. The law of this period is often referred to as the classical period of Roman law. The literary and practical achievements of the jurists of this period gave Roman law its unique shape. The jurists worked in different functions: They gave legal opinions at the request of private parties. They advised the magistrates who were entrusted with the administration of justice, most importantly the praetors. They helped the praetors draft their edicts, in which they publicly announced at the beginning of their tenure, how they would handle their duties, and the formularies, according to which specific proceedings were conducted. Some jurists also held high judicial and administrative offices themselves. The jurists also produced all kinds of legal punishments. Around AD 130 the jurist Salvius Iulianus drafted a standard form of the praetor's edict, which was used by all praetors from that time onwards. This edict contained detailed descriptions of all cases, in which the praetor would allow a legal action and in which he would grant a defense. The standard edict thus functioned like a comprehensive law code, even though it did not formally have the force of law. It indicated the requirements for a successful legal claim. The edict therefore became the basis for extensive legal commentaries by later classical jurists like Paulus and Ulpian. The new concepts and legal institutions developed by pre-classical and classical jurists are too numerous to mention here. Only a few examples are given here: Roman jurists clearly separated the legal right to use a thing (ownership) from the factual ability to use and manipulate the thing (possession). They also established the distinction between contract and tort as sources of legal obligations. The standard types of contract (sale, contract for work, hire, contract for services) regulated in most continental codes and the characteristics of each of these contracts were developed by Roman jurisprudence. The classical jurist Gaius (around 160) invented a system of private law based on the division of all material into personae (persons), res (things) and actiones (legal actions). This system was used for many centuries. It can be recognized in legal treatises like William Blackstone's Commentaries on the Laws of England and enactments like the French Code civil or the German BGB. The Roman Republic had three different branches: Assemblies Senate Consuls The Assemblies could decide whether war or peace. The Senate had complete control over the Treasury, and the Consuls had the highest juridical power.[6] Post-classical law By the middle of the 3rd century, the conditions for the flourishing of a refined legal culture had become less favourable. The general political and economic situation deteriorated as the emperors assumed more direct control of all aspects of political life. The political system of the principate, which had retained some features of the republican constitution, began to transform itself into the absolute monarchy of the dominate. The existence of a legal science and of jurists who regarded law as a science, not as an instrument to achieve the political goals set by the absolute monarch, did not fit well into the new order of things. The literary production all but ended. Few jurists after the mid-3rd century are known by name. While legal science and legal education persisted to some extent in the eastern part of the Empire, most of the subtleties of classical law came to be disregarded and finally forgotten in the west. Classical law was replaced by so-called vulgar law. Substance Play media The basics of Roman law Concept of laws ius civile, ius gentium, and ius naturale – the ius civile ("citizen law", originally ius civile Quiritium) was the body of common laws that applied to Roman citizens and the Praetores Urbani, the individuals who had jurisdiction over cases involving citizens. The ius gentium ("law of peoples") was the body of common laws that applied to foreigners, and their dealings with Roman citizens. The Praetores Peregrini were the individuals who had jurisdiction over cases involving citizens and foreigners. Jus naturale was a concept the jurists developed to explain why all people seemed to obey some laws. Their answer was that a "natural law" instilled in all beings a common sense. ius scriptum and ius non-scriptum – meaning written and unwritten law, respectively. In practice, the two differed by the means of their creation and not necessarily whether or not they were written down. The ius scriptum was the body of statute laws made by the legislature. The laws were known as leges (lit. "laws") and plebiscita (lit. "plebiscites," originating in the Plebeian Council). Roman lawyers would also include in the ius scriptum the edicts of magistrates (magistratuum edicta), the advice of the Senate (Senatus consulta), the responses and thoughts of jurists (responsa prudentium), and the proclamations and beliefs of the emperor (principum placita). Ius non-scriptum was the body of common laws that arose from customary practice and had become binding over time. ius commune and ius singulare – Ius singulare (singular law) is special law for certain groups of people, things, or legal relations (because of which it is an exception from the general rules of the legal system), unlike general, ordinary, law (ius commune). An example of this is the law about wills written by people in the military during a campaign, which are exempt of the solemnities generally required for citizens when writing wills in normal circumstances. ius publicum and ius privatum – ius publicum means public law and ius privatum means private law, where public law is to protect the interests of the Roman state while private law should protect individuals. In the Roman law ius privatum included personal, property, civil and criminal law; judicial proceeding was private process (iudicium privatum); and crimes were private (except the most severe ones that were prosecuted by the state). Public law will only include some areas of private law close to the end of the Roman state. Ius publicum was also used to describe obligatory legal regulations (today called ius cogens—this term is applied in modern international law to indicate peremptory norms that cannot be derogated from). These are regulations that cannot be changed or excluded by party agreement. Those regulations that can be changed are called today ius dispositivum, and they are not used when party shares something and are in contrary. Public law Main articles: Ius publicum, Constitution of the Roman Republic, and Res publica Cicero, author of the classic book The Laws, attacks Catiline for attempting a coup in the Roman Senate. The Roman Republic's constitution or mos maiorum ("custom of the ancestors") was an unwritten set of guidelines and principles passed down mainly through precedent. Concepts that originated in the Roman constitution live on in constitutions to this day. Examples include checks and balances, the separation of powers, vetoes, filibusters, quorum requirements, term limits, impeachments, the powers of the purse, and regularly scheduled elections. Even some lesser used modern constitutional concepts, such as the block voting found in the electoral college of the United States, originate from ideas found in the Roman constitution. The constitution of the Roman Republic was not formal or even official. Its constitution was largely unwritten, and was constantly evolving throughout the life of the Republic. Throughout the 1st century BC, the power and legitimacy of the Roman constitution was progressively eroding. Even Roman constitutionalists, such as the senator Cicero, lost a willingness to remain faithful to it towards the end of the republic. When the Roman Republic ultimately fell in the years following the Battle of Actium and Mark Antony's suicide, what was left of the Roman constitution died along with the Republic. The first Roman Emperor, Augustus, attempted to manufacture the appearance of a constitution that still governed the Empire, by utilising that constitution's institutions to lend legitimacy to the Principate, e.g. reusing prior grants of greater imperium to substantiate Augustus' greater imperium over the Imperial provinces and the prorogation of different magistracies to justify Augustus' receipt of tribunician power. The belief in a surviving constitution lasted well into the life of the Roman Empire. Private law Main articles: Ius privatum, Stipulatio, and Rei vindicatio Stipulatio was the basic form of contract in Roman law. It was made in the format of question and answer. The precise nature of the contract was disputed, as can be seen below. Rei vindicatio is a legal action by which the plaintiff demands that the defendant return a thing that belongs to the plaintiff. It may only be used when plaintiff owns the thing, and the defendant is somehow impeding the plaintiff's possession of the thing. The plaintiff could also institute an actio furti (a personal action) to punish the defendant. If the thing could not be recovered, the plaintiff could claim damages from the defendant with the aid of the condictio furtiva (a personal action). With the aid of the actio legis Aquiliae (a personal action), the plaintiff could claim damages from the defendant. Rei vindicatio was derived from the ius civile, therefore was only available to Roman citizens. Status Main article: Status in Roman legal system To describe a person's position in the legal system, Romans mostly used the expression togeus. The individual could have been a Roman citizen (status civitatis) unlike foreigners, or he could have been free (status libertatis) unlike slaves, or he could have had a certain position in a Roman family (status familiae) either as the head of the family (pater familias), or some lower member—alieni iuris—which lives by someone else's law. Two status types were senator and emperor. Litigation Main article: Roman litigation The history of Roman Law can be divided into three systems of procedure: that of legis actiones, the formulary system, and cognitio extra ordinem. The periods in which these systems were in use overlapped one another and did not have definitive breaks, but it can be stated that the legis actio system prevailed from the time of the XII Tables (c. 450 BC) until about the end of the 2nd century BC, that the formulary procedure was primarily used from the last century of the Republic until the end of the classical period (c. AD 200), and that of cognitio extra ordinem was in use in post-classical times. Again, these dates are meant as a tool to help understand the types of procedure in use, not as a rigid boundary where one system stopped and another began.[7] During the republic and until the bureaucratization of Roman judicial procedure, the judge was usually a private person (iudex privatus). He had to be a Roman male citizen. The parties could agree on a judge, or they could appoint one from a list, called album iudicum. They went down the list until they found a judge agreeable to both parties, or if none could be found they had to take the last one on the list. No one had a legal obligation to judge a case. The judge had great latitude in the way he conducted the litigation. He considered all the evidence and ruled in the way that seemed just. Because the judge was not a jurist or a legal technician, he often consulted a jurist about the technical aspects of the case, but he was not bound by the jurist's reply. At the end of the litigation, if things were not clear to him, he could refuse to give a judgment, by swearing that it wasn't clear. Also, there was a maximum time to issue a judgment, which depended on some technical issues (type of action, etc.). Later on, with the bureaucratization, this procedure disappeared, and was substituted by the so-called "extra ordinem" procedure, also known as cognitory. The whole case was reviewed before a magistrate, in a single phase. The magistrate had obligation to judge and to issue a decision, and the decision could be appealed to a higher magistrate. Legacy German legal theorist Rudolf von Jhering famously remarked that ancient Rome had conquered the world three times: the first through its armies, the second through its religion, the third through its laws. He might have added: each time more thoroughly. — David Graeber, Debt: The First 5,000 Years In the East Main articles: Corpus Juris Civilis and Byzantine law Title page of a late 16th-century edition of the Digesta, part of Emperor Justinian's Corpus Juris Civilis When the centre of the Empire was moved to the Greek East in the 4th century, many legal concepts of Greek origin appeared in the official Roman legislation.[8] The influence is visible even in the law of persons or of the family, which is traditionally the part of the law that changes least. For example, Constantine started putting restrictions on the ancient Roman concept of patria potestas, the power held by the male head of a family over his descendants, by acknowledging that persons in potestate, the descendants, could have proprietary rights. He was apparently making concessions to the much stricter concept of paternal authority under Greek-Hellenistic law.[8] The Codex Theodosianus (438 AD) was a codification of Constantian laws. Later emperors went even further, until Justinian finally decreed that a child in potestate became owner of everything it acquired, except when it acquired something from its father.[8] The codes of Justinian, particularly the Corpus Juris Civilis (529–534) continued to be the basis of legal practice in the Empire throughout its so-called Byzantine history. Leo III the Isaurian issued a new code, the Ecloga,[9] in the early 8th century. In the 9th century, the emperors Basil I and Leo VI the Wise commissioned a combined translation of the Code and the Digest, parts of Justinian's codes, into Greek, which became known as the Basilica. Roman law as preserved in the codes of Justinian and in the Basilica remained the basis of legal practice in Greece and in the courts of the Eastern Orthodox Church even after the fall of the Byzantine Empire and the conquest by the Turks, and, along with the Syro-Roman law book, also formed the basis for much of the Fetha Negest, which remained in force in Ethiopia until 1931. In the West Main articles: Early Germanic law, Anglo-Saxon law, and Medieval Roman Law In the west, Justinian's political authority never went any farther than certain portions of the Italian and Hispanic peninsulas. In Law codes were issued by the Germanic kings, however, the influence of early Eastern Roman codes on some of these is quite discernible. In many early Germanic states, Roman citizens continued to be governed by Roman laws for quite some time, even while members of the various Germanic tribes were governed by their own respective codes. The Codex Justinianus and the Institutes of Justinian were known in Western Europe, and along with the earlier code of Theodosius II, served as models for a few of the Germanic law codes; however, the Digest portion was largely ignored for several centuries until around 1070, when a manuscript of the Digest was rediscovered in Italy. This was done mainly through the works of glossars who wrote their comments between lines (glossa interlinearis), or in the form of marginal notes (glossa marginalis). From that time, scholars began to study the ancient Roman legal texts, and to teach others what they learned from their studies. The center of these studies was Bologna. The law school there gradually developed into Europe's first university. The students who were taught Roman law in Bologna (and later in many other places) found that many rules of Roman law were better suited to regulate complex economic transactions than were the customary rules, which were applicable throughout Europe. For this reason, Roman law, or at least some provisions borrowed from it, began to be re-introduced into legal practice, centuries after the end of the Roman empire. This process was actively supported by many kings and princes who employed university-trained jurists as counselors and court officials and sought to benefit from rules like the famous Princeps legibus solutus est ("The sovereign is not bound by the laws", a phrase initially coined by Ulpian, a Roman jurist). There are several reasons that Roman law was favored in the Middle Ages. Roman law regulated the legal protection of property and the equality of legal subjects and their wills, and it prescribed the possibility that the legal subjects could dispose their property through testament. By the middle of the 16th century, the rediscovered Roman law dominated the legal practice of many European countries. A legal system, in which Roman law was mixed with elements of canon law and of Germanic custom, especially feudal law, had emerged. This legal system, which was common to all of continental Europe (and Scotland) was known as Ius Commune. This Ius Commune and the legal systems based on it are usually referred to as civil law in English-speaking countries. Only England and the Nordic countries did not take part in the wholesale reception of Roman law. One reason for this is that the English legal system was more developed than its continental counterparts by the time Roman law was rediscovered. Therefore, the practical advantages of Roman law were less obvious to English practitioners than to continental lawyers. As a result, the English system of common law developed in parallel to Roman-based civil law, with its practitioners being trained at the Inns of Court in London rather than receiving degrees in Canon or Civil Law at the Universities of Oxford or Cambridge. Elements of Romano-canon law were present in England in the ecclesiastical courts and, less directly, through the development of the equity system. In addition, some concepts from Roman law made their way into the common law. Especially in the early 19th century, English lawyers and judges were willing to borrow rules and ideas from continental jurists and directly from Roman law. The practical application of Roman law, and the era of the European Ius Commune, came to an end when national codifications were made. In 1804, the French civil code came into force. In the course of the 19th century, many European states either adopted the French model or drafted their own codes. In Germany, the political situation made the creation of a national code of laws impossible. From the 17th century, Roman law in Germany had been heavily influenced by domestic (customary) law, and it was called usus modernus Pandectarum. In some parts of Germany, Roman law continued to be applied until the German civil code (Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, BGB) went into effect in 1900.[10] Colonial expansion spread the civil law system.[11] Today Today, Roman law is no longer applied in legal practice, even though the legal systems of some countries like South Africa and San Marino are still based on the old jus commune. However, even where the legal practice is based on a code, many rules deriving from Roman law apply: no code completely broke with the Roman tradition. Rather, the provisions of the Roman law were fitted into a more coherent system and expressed in the national language. For this reason, knowledge of the Roman law is indispensable to understand the legal systems of today. Thus, Roman law is often still a mandatory subject for law students in civil law jurisdictions. As steps towards a unification of the private law in the member states of the European Union are being taken, the old jus commune, which was the common basis of legal practice everywhere in Europe, but allowed for many local variants, is seen by many as a model. See also Ancient Rome portal Abalienatio (legal transfer of property) Auctoritas (power of the sovereign) Basileus (akin to modern sovereign) Capitis deminutio Certiorari Cessio bonorum (surrender of goods to a creditor) Compascuus (common pasture) Constitution (Roman law) Homo sacer Interregnum Justitium (akin to modern state of exception) Lex Caecilia Didia Lex Duodecim Tabularum Lex Junia Licinia Lex Manciana List of Roman laws Res extra commercium Roman-Dutch law Stipulatio Ancient Greek law References ^ In Germany, Art. 311 BGB ^ Herbermann, Charles, ed. (1913). "Roman Law" . Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. ^ Jenő Szmodis: The Reality of the Law – From the Etruscan Religion to the Postmodern Theories of Law; Ed. Kairosz, Budapest, 2005. ^ a b c d e f g "A Short History of Roman Law", Olga Tellegen-Couperus pp. 19–20. ^ Berger, Adolf (1953). Encyclopedic Dictionary of Roman Law. The American Journal of Philology. 76. pp. 90–93. doi:10.2307/297597. ISBN 9780871694324. JSTOR 291711. ^ "Consul". Livius.org. 2002. Retrieved 19 June 2017. ^ Jolowicz, Herbert Felix; Nicholas, Barry (1967). Historical Introduction to the Study of Roman Law. Cambridge University Press. p. 528. ISBN 9780521082532. ^ a b c Tellegen-Couperus, Olga Eveline (1993). A Short History of Roman Law. Psychology Press. p. 174. ISBN 9780415072502. ^ "Ecloga". Encyclopedia Britannica. Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc. 20 July 1998. Retrieved 6 October 2018. ^ Wolff, Hans Julius, 1902-1983. (1951). Roman law : an historical introduction. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press. p. 208. ISBN 0585116784. OCLC 44953814.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) ^ Rheinstein, Max; Glendon, Mary Ann; Carozza, Paolo. "Civil law (Romano-Germanic)". Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. Retrieved 6 October 2018. Sources Berger, Adolf, "Encyclopedic Dictionary of Roman Law", Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, Vol. 43, Part 2., pp. 476. Philadelphia : American Philosophical Society, 1953. (reprinted 1980, 1991, 2002). ISBN 1-58477-142-9 Further reading Bablitz, Leanne E. 2007. Actors and Audience in the Roman Courtroom. London: Routledge. Bauman, Richard A. 1989. Lawyers and Politics in the Early Roman Empire. Munich: Beck. Borkowski, Andrew, and Paul Du Plessis. 2005. A Textbook on Roman Law. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. Buckland, William Warwick. 1963. A Textbook of Roman Law from Augustus to Justinian. Revised by P. G. Stein. 3d edition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press. Daube, David. 1969. Roman Law: Linguistic, Social and Philosophical Aspects. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Univ. Press. De Ligt, Luuk. 2007. "Roman Law and the Roman Economy: Three Case Studies." Latomus 66.1: 10–25. du Plessis, Paul. 2006. "Janus in the Roman Law of Urban Lease." Historia 55.1: 48–63. Gardner, Jane F. 1986. Women in Roman Law and Society. London: Croom Helm. Gardner, Jane F. 1998. Family and Familia in Roman Law and Life. Clarendon Press. Harries, Jill. 1999. Law and Empire in Late Antiquity. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. Nicholas, Barry. 1962. An Introduction to Roman Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Nicholas, Barry, and Peter Birks, eds. 1989. New Perspectives in the Roman Law of Property. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. Powell, Jonathan, and Jeremy Paterson, eds. 2004. Cicero the Advocate. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. Rives, James B. 2003. "Magic in Roman Law: The Reconstruction of a Crime." Classical Antiquity 22.2: 313–39. Schulz, Fritz. 1946. History of Roman Legal Science. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Stein, Peter. 1999. Roman Law in European History. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press. Tellegen-Couperus, Olga E. 1993. A Short History of Roman Law. London: Routledge. Wenger, Leopold. 1953. Die Quellen des römischen Rechts. Vienna: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften. External links Wikimedia Commons has media related to Roman law. Library resources about Roman law Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries A collection of resources maintained by professor Ernest Metzger The Roman Law Library by Professor Yves Lassard and Alexandr Koptev The Roman Law Articles of Smith's Dictionary Roman Legal Tradition: open access journal devoted to Roman law "Roman Law" . Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed.). 1911. v t e Roman Constitution Ancient Rome History Constitution Senate Assemblies Curiate Century Tribal Plebeian Magistrates Roman Kingdom History Constitution Senate Assemblies Magistrates Roman Republic History Constitution (reforms of Sulla • reforms of Caesar • reforms of Augustus) Senate Assemblies Magistrates Roman Empire History (post Diocletian) Constitution (post Diocletian) Senate Assemblies Magistrates Miscellaneous Sulla's Constitutional Reforms Caesar's Constitutional Reforms Conflict of the Orders Roman law v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films v t e Law Core subjects Administrative law Civil law Constitutional law Contract Criminal law Deed Equity Evidence International law Law of obligations Procedure Civil Criminal Property law Public law Restitution Statutory law Tort Other subjects Agricultural law Aviation law Amnesty law Banking law Bankruptcy Commercial law Competition law Conflict of laws Construction law Consumer protection Corporate law Cyberlaw Election law Energy law Entertainment law Environmental law Family law Financial law Financial regulation Health law History of the legal profession History of the American legal profession Immigration law Intellectual property International criminal law International human rights International slavery laws Jurimetrics Labour Law of war Legal archaeology Legal fiction Maritime law Media law Military law Probate Estate Will and testament Product liability Public international law Space law Sports law Tax law Transport law Trust law Unenforced law Women in law Sources of law Charter Code Constitution Custom Divine right Divine law Human rights Natural law Natural and legal rights Case law Precedent Law making Ballot measure Codification Decree Edict Executive order Proclamation Legislation Delegated legislation General executory decree Regulation Rulemaking Promulgation Repeal Treaty Concordat Statutory law Statute Act of Parliament Act of Congress (US) Legal systems Civil law Common law Chinese law Legal pluralism Religious law Canon law Hindu law Jain law Jewish law Sharia Roman law Socialist law Statutory law Xeer Yassa Legal theory Contract theory Critical legal studies Comparative law Feminist Fundamental theory of canon law Law and economics Legal formalism History International legal theory Principle of legality Rule of law Sociology Jurisprudence Adjudication Administration of justice Criminal justice Court-martial Dispute resolution Fiqh Lawsuit/Litigation Legal opinion Legal remedy Judge Justice of the peace Magistrate Judgment Judicial review Jurisdiction Jury Justice Practice of law Attorney Barrister Counsel Lawyer Legal representation Prosecutor Solicitor Question of fact Question of law Trial Trial advocacy Trier of fact Verdict Legal institutions Bureaucracy The bar The bench Civil society Court Court of equity Election commission Executive Judiciary Law enforcement Legal education Law school Legislature Military Police Political party Tribunal Category Index Outline Portal Authority control GND: 4050306-9 HDS: 008933 NDL: 00569668 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Roman_law&oldid=981275024" Categories: Roman law Italian inventions Hidden categories: Articles incorporating a citation from the 1913 Catholic Encyclopedia with Wikisource reference CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list Wikipedia indefinitely semi-protected pages Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata Commons category link is on Wikidata Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica with Wikisource reference Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with HDS identifiers Wikipedia articles with NDL identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read View source View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Languages العربية Asturianu Azərbaycanca Беларуская Български Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français Gaeilge Galego 한국어 Հայերեն Hrvatski Bahasa Indonesia Interlingua Íslenska Italiano עברית ქართული Қазақша Latina Latviešu Lietuvių Lingua Franca Nova Magyar Македонски Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Occitan Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча Plattdüütsch Polski Português Română Русский Scots Sicilianu සිංහල Simple English Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Türkçe Українська Tiếng Việt 吴语 粵語 Zazaki 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 1 October 2020, at 09:57 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2727 ---- Roman legion - Wikipedia Roman legion From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search For other uses, see Roman legion (disambiguation). See also: List of Roman legions Ancient heavy infantry unit of 1,000 to 5,000 men This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Roman legion" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (November 2008) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) Part of a series on the Military of ancient Rome 753 BC – AD 476 Structural history Army Unit types and ranks Decorations and punishments Legions Auxilia Generals Navy Fleets Admirals Campaign history Wars and battles Technological history Military engineering Castra Siege engines Triumphal arches Roads Political history   Strategy and tactics Infantry tactics Frontiers and fortifications Limes Limes Britannicus Antonine Wall Hadrian's Wall Saxon Shore Limes Germanicus Alb Limes Lauter Valley Limes Lower Germanic Limes Main Limes Neckar-Odenwald Limes Upper Germanic-Rhaetian Limes Wetterau Limes Danube–Iller–Rhine Limes Norican Limes Claustra Alpium Iuliarum Pannonian Limes Limes Alutanus Limes Moesiae Trajan's Wall Anastasian Wall Limes Sarmatiae Limes Arabicus Limes Tripolitanus Limes Mauretaniae  Ancient Rome portal •  War portal v t e The Roman legion was the largest military unit of the Roman army. A legion was roughly of brigade size, composed of 4,200 infantry and 300 cavalry in the republican period, extended to 5,200 infantry and 120 auxilia in the imperial period. Contents 1 Etymology 2 Function and constitution 3 Longevity 4 Overview of typical organization and strength 5 Evolution 6 Size 7 History 7.1 Roman kings (to c. 500 BC) 7.2 Roman Republic (509–107 BC) 7.3 Late Republic (107–30 BC) 7.4 Early Empire (27 BC–AD 284) 7.5 Later Empire (from 284 AD) 8 Legionary ranks 8.1 Senior officers 8.2 Centurions 8.3 Lower ranks 8.4 Special duty posts 9 Pay 10 Symbols 11 Discipline 11.1 Minor punishments 11.2 Major punishments 12 Factors in the legion's success 13 See also 14 References 14.1 Citations 14.2 Bibliography 15 External links Etymology[edit] In the early Roman Kingdom legion may have meant the entire Roman army, but sources on this period are few and unreliable.[1] The subsequent organization of legions varied greatly over time but legions were typically composed of around five thousand soldiers. During much of the republican era, a legion was divided into three lines of ten maniples. In the late republic and much of the imperial period (from about 100 BC), a legion was divided into ten cohorts, each of six (or five) centuries. Legions also included a small ala, or cavalry unit. By the third century AD, the legion was a much smaller unit of about 1,000 to 1,500 men, and there were more of them. In the fourth century AD, East Roman border guard legions (limitanei) may have become even smaller. In terms of organisation and function, the republican era legion may have been influenced by the ancient Greek and Macedonian phalanx.[2] Function and constitution[edit] For most of the Roman Imperial period, the legions formed the Roman army's elite heavy infantry, recruited exclusively from Roman citizens, while the remainder of the army consisted of auxiliaries, who provided additional infantry and the vast majority of the Roman army's cavalry. (Provincials who aspired to citizenship gained it when honourably discharged from the auxiliaries.) The Roman army, for most of the Imperial period, consisted mostly of auxiliaries rather than legions.[3] Longevity[edit] Many of the legions founded before 40 BC were still active until at least the fifth century, notably Legio V Macedonica, which was founded by Augustus in 43 BC and was in Egypt in the seventh century during the Islamic conquest of Egypt. Overview of typical organization and strength[edit] Main article: Structural history of the Roman military Imperial Roman legionaries in tight formation, a relief from Glanum, a Roman town in what is now southern France that was inhabited from 27 BC to 260 AD (when it was sacked by invading Alemanni) Because legions were not permanent units until the Marian reforms (c. 107 BC), and were instead created, used, and disbanded again, several hundred legions were named and numbered throughout Roman history. To date, about 50 have been identified. The republican legions were composed of levied men that paid for their own equipment and thus the structure of the Roman army at this time reflected the society, and at any time there would be four consular legions (with command divided between the two ruling consuls) and in time of war extra legions could be levied. Toward the end of the 2nd century BC, Rome started to experience manpower shortages brought about by property and financial qualifications to join the army. This prompted consul Gaius Marius to remove property qualifications and decree that all citizens, regardless of their wealth or social class, were made eligible for service in the Roman army with equipment and rewards for fulfilling 6 years of service provided by the state. The Roman army became a volunteer, professional and standing army which extended service beyond Roman citizens but also to non-citizens who could sign on as auxillia (auxiliaries) and were rewarded Roman citizenship upon completion of service and all the rights and privileges that entailed. In the time of Augustus, there were nearly 50 upon his succession but this was reduced to about 25–35 permanent standing legions and this remained the figure for most of the empire's history. Evolution[edit] The legion evolved from 3,000 men in the Roman Republic to over 5,200 men in the Roman Empire, consisting of centuries as the basic units. Until the middle of the first century, ten cohorts (about 500 men) made up a Roman legion. This was later changed to nine cohorts of standard size (with six centuries at 80 men each) with the first cohort being of double strength (five double-strength centuries with 160 men each). By the fourth century AD, the legion was a much smaller unit of about 1,000 to 1,500 men, and there were more of them. This had come about as the large formation legion and auxiliary unit, 10,000 men, was broken down into smaller units - originally temporary detachments - to cover more territory. In the fourth century AD, East Roman border guard legions (limitanei) may have become even smaller. In terms of organisation and function, the Republican era legion may have been influenced by the ancient Greek and Macedonian phalanx.[2] Size[edit] The size of a typical legion varied throughout the history of ancient Rome, with complements of 4,200 legionaries and 300 equites (drawn from the wealthier classes – in early Rome all troops provided their own equipment) in the republican period of Rome (the infantry were split into 10 cohorts each of four maniples of 120 legionaries), to 5,200 men plus 120 auxiliaries in the imperial period (split into 10 cohorts, nine of 480 men each, plus the first cohort holding 800 men). History[edit] Main articles: Roman army, Military history of ancient Rome, and Structural history of the Roman military Roman kings (to c. 500 BC)[edit] Main article: Early Roman army In the period before the raising of the legio and the early years of the Roman Kingdom and the Republic, forces are described as being organized into centuries of roughly one hundred men. These centuries were grouped together as required and answered to the leader who had hired or raised them. Such independent organization persisted until the 2nd century BC amongst light infantry and cavalry, but was discarded completely in later periods with the supporting role taken instead by allied troops. The roles of century leader (later formalized as a centurion), second in command and standard bearer are referenced in this early period. Rome's early period is undocumented and shrouded in myths, but those myths tell that during the rule of Servius Tullius, the census (from Latin: censeō – accounting of the people) was introduced. With this all Roman able-bodied, property-owning male citizens were divided into five classes for military service based on their wealth and then organized into centuries as sub-units of the greater Roman army or legio (multitude). Joining the army was both a duty and a distinguishing mark of Roman citizenship; during the entire pre-Marian period the wealthiest land owners performed the most years of military service. These individuals would have had the most to lose should the state have fallen. Roman Republic (509–107 BC)[edit] Main article: Roman army of the mid-Republic At some point, possibly in the beginning of the Roman Republic after the kings were overthrown, the legio was subdivided into two separate legions, each one ascribed to one of the two consuls. In the first years of the Republic, when warfare was mostly concentrated on raiding, it is uncertain if the full manpower of the legions was summoned at any one time. In 494 BC, when three foreign threats emerged, the dictator Manius Valerius Maximus raised ten legions which Livy says was a greater number than had been raised previously at any one time.[4] Also, some warfare was still conducted by Roman forces outside the legionary structure, the most famous example being the campaign in 479 BC by the clan army of gens Fabia against the Etruscan city of Veii (in which the clan was annihilated). Legions became more formally organized in the 4th century BC, as Roman warfare evolved to more frequent and planned operations, and the consular army was raised to two legions each. In the Republic, legions had an ephemeral existence. Except for Legio I to IV, which were the consular armies (two per consul), other units were levied by campaign. Rome's Italian allies were required to provide approximately ten cohorts (auxilia were not organized into legions) to support each Roman Legion. In the middle of the Republic, legions were composed of the following units: Equites (cavalry): The cavalry was originally the most prestigious unit, where wealthy young Roman men displayed their skill and prowess, laying the foundation for an eventual political career. Cavalry equipment was purchased by each of the cavalrymen and consisted of a round shield, helmet, body armour, sword and one or more lances. The cavalry was outnumbered in the legion. In a total of circa 3,000 men, (plus the velites that normally enlarged the number to about 4,200), the legion only had around 300 horsemen, divided into 10 units (turmae) of 30 men. These men were commanded by decurions. In addition to heavy cavalry, there would be the light cavalry levied from poor citizens and wealthy young citizens not old enough to be in the hastati or the equites. In battle, they were used to disrupt and outflank enemy infantry formations and to fight off enemy cavalry. In the latter type of engagement, they would often (though not always) dismount some or all of the horsemen to fight a stationary battle on foot, an unusual tactic for the time, but one that offered significant advantages in stability and agility in a time before stirrups.[5] Velites (light infantry): The velites were mainly poorer citizens who could not afford to equip themselves properly. Their primary function was to act as skirmishers – javelin-throwers, who would engage the enemy early in order either to harass them or to cover the movement of troops behind them. After throwing their javelins, they would retreat through the gaps between the maniples, screened from the attack of the enemy by the heavy infantry lines. With the shortage of cavalry in the army of the early to mid Republican army, the velites were also used as scouts. They did not have a precise formal organization or formation. Heavy infantry: This was the principal unit of the legion. The heavy infantry was composed of citizen legionaries that could afford the equipment composed of an iron helmet, shield, armour and pilum, a heavy javelin whose range was about 30 meters. After 387 BC, the preferred weapon for the hastati and principes was the gladius, a short sword. Their hobnailed sandals (caligae) were also an effective weapon against a fallen enemy. Prior to the Marian reforms (see below), the heavy infantry was subdivided, according to experience, into three separate lines of troops: The hastati (sing. hastatus) consisted of raw or inexperienced soldiers, considered to be less reliable than legionaries of several years' service. The Hastati were placed at the front for several reasons. One reason is the city of Rome could ill-afford to lose experienced soldiers, so they put the greenest soldiers at the front. If they survived, the Hastati/tus would gain invaluable experience. Another reason is if the newest soldiers succumbed to battle nerves and broke and tried to run, then there were experienced soldiers behind them to stiffen their resolve. The principes (sing. princeps) These were the more experienced soldiers, often better equipped than the Hastati, and having more experience on the battlefield, they would take up the second line in the battle in the event the Hastati failed or fled. They were the second wave in an early Republican Legion before the military reforms of Marius. The triarii (sing. triarius) were the veteran soldiers, to be used in battle only in extreme situations; they rested one knee down when not engaged in combat. The triarii served primarily as reserves or barrier troops designed to backstop the hastati and principes, and were equipped with long hastae (spears) rather than the pilum and gladius (the hastati and principes stopped using spears in 387 BC). Thus armed, they fought in a phalanx formation. The sight of an advancing armored formation of triarii legionaries frequently discouraged exultant enemies in pursuit of retreating hastati and principes troops. Ad triarios redisse – To fall back upon the triarii was a Roman idiom – meaning to use one's last resort. Each of these three lines was subdivided into (usually 10) chief tactical units called maniples. A maniple consisted of two centuries and was commanded by the senior of the two centurions. At this time, each century of hastati and principes consisted of 60 men; a century of triarii was 30 men. These 3,000 men (twenty maniples of 120 men, and ten maniples of 60 men), together with about 1,200 velites and 300 cavalry gave the mid Republican ("manipular") legion a nominal strength of about 4,500 men. Late Republic (107–30 BC)[edit] Main article: Roman army of the late Republic Visual representation of the post Marian Reform Legion showing size and disposition for Infantry formations See also List of Roman legions for details of notable late Republican legions See also Sub-Units of the Roman legion The Marian reforms (of Gaius Marius) enlarged the centuries to 80 men, and grouped them into six-century "cohorts" (rather than two-century maniples). Each century had its own standard and was made up of ten units (contubernia) of eight men who shared a tent, a millstone, a mule and cooking pot. Following the reforms of the general Marius in the 2nd century BC, the legions took on the second, narrower meaning that is familiar in the popular imagination as close-order citizen heavy infantry. At the end of the 2nd century BC, Gaius Marius reformed the previously ephemeral legions as a professional force drawing from the poorest classes, enabling Rome to field larger armies and providing employment for jobless citizens of the city of Rome. However, this put the loyalty of the soldiers in the hands of their general rather than the State of Rome itself. This development ultimately enabled Julius Caesar to cross the Rubicon with an army loyal to him personally and effectively end the Republic. The legions of the late Republic and early Empire are often called Marian legions. Following the Battle of Vercellae in 101 BC, Marius granted all Italian soldiers Roman citizenship. He justified this action to the Senate by saying that in the din of battle he could not distinguish Roman from ally. This effectively eliminated the notion of allied legions; henceforth all Italian legions would be regarded as Roman legions, and full Roman citizenship was open to all the regions of Italy. At the same time, the three different types of heavy infantry were replaced by a single, standard type based on the Principes: armed with two heavy javelins called pila (singular pilum), the short sword called gladius, chain mail (lorica hamata), helmet and rectangular shield (scutum). The role of allied legions would eventually be taken up by contingents of allied auxiliary troops, called Auxilia. Auxilia contained specialist units, engineers and pioneers, artillerymen and craftsmen, service and support personnel and irregular units made up of non-citizens, mercenaries and local militia. These were usually formed into complete units such as light cavalry, light infantry or velites, and labourers. There was also a reconnaissance squad of 10 or more light mounted infantry called speculatores who could also serve as messengers or even as an early form of military intelligence service. As part of the Marian reforms, the legions' internal organization was standardized. Each legion was divided into cohorts. Prior to this, cohorts had been temporary administrative units or tactical task forces of several maniples, even more transitory than the legions themselves. Now the cohorts were ten permanent units, composed of 6 centuries and in the case of the first cohort 5 double strength centuries each led by a centurion assisted by an optio. The cohorts came to form the basic tactical unit of the legions. Ranking within the legion was based on length of service, with the senior Centurion commanding the first century of the first cohort; he was called the primus pilus (First Spear), and reported directly to the superior officers (legates and tribuni). All career soldiers could be promoted to the higher ranks in recognition of exceptional acts of bravery or valour. A newly promoted junior Centurion would be assigned to the sixth century of the tenth cohort and slowly progressed through the ranks from there. Every legion had a large baggage train, which included 640 mules (1 mule for every 8 legionaries) just for the soldiers' equipment. To keep these baggage trains from becoming too large and slow, Marius had each infantryman carry as much of his own equipment as he could, including his own armour, weapons and 15 days' rations, for about 25–30 kg (50–60 pounds) of load total. To make this easier, he issued each legionary a cross stick to carry their loads on their shoulders. The soldiers were nicknamed Marius' Mules because of the amount of gear they had to carry themselves. This arrangement allowed for the possibility for the supply train to become temporarily detached from the main body of the legion, thus greatly increasing the army's speed when needed. A typical legion of this period had 5,120 legionaries as well as a large number of camp followers, servants and slaves. Legions could contain as many as 11,000 fighting men when including the auxiliaries. During the Later Roman Empire, the legion was reduced in size to 1,000 to allow for easier provisioning and to expand the regions under surveillance. Numbers would also vary depending on casualties suffered during a campaign; Julius Caesar's legions during his campaign in Gaul often only had around 3,500 men. Tactics were not very different from the past, but their effectiveness was largely improved because of the professional training of the soldiers. A re-enactor as a Roman centurion, c. 70. A re-enactor, showing a Roman miles, (2nd century). After the Marian reforms and throughout the history of Rome's Late Republic, the legions played an important political role. By the 1st century BC, the threat of the legions under a demagogue was recognized. Governors were not allowed to leave their provinces with their legions. When Julius Caesar broke this rule, leaving his province of Gaul and crossing the Rubicon into Italy, he precipitated a constitutional crisis. This crisis and the civil wars which followed brought an end to the Republic and led to the foundation of the Empire under Augustus in 27 BC. The Roman empire under Hadrian (ruled 117–38), showing the legions deployed in 125 Early Empire (27 BC–AD 284)[edit] Main article: Imperial Roman army See List of Roman legions of the early Empire See also Sub-Units of the Roman legion Map of Roman legions by 14 AD. Generals, during the recent Republican civil wars, had formed their own legions and numbered them as they wished. During this time, there was a high incidence of Gemina (twin) legions, where two legions were consolidated into a single organization (and was later made official and put under a legatus and six duces). At the end of the civil war against Mark Antony, Augustus was left with around fifty legions, with several double counts (multiple Legio Xs for instance). For political and economic reasons, Augustus reduced the number of legions to 28 (which diminished to 25 after the Battle of Teutoburg Forest, in which 3 legions were completely destroyed by the Germanics). Beside streamlining the army, Augustus also regulated the soldiers' pay. At the same time, he greatly increased the number of auxiliaries to the point where they were equal in number to the legionaries. He also created the Praetorian Guard along with a permanent navy where served the liberti, or freed slaves. The legions also became permanent at this time, and not recruited for particular campaigns. They were also allocated to static bases with permanent castra legionaria (legionary fortresses). Augustus' military policies proved sound and cost effective, and were generally followed by his successors. These emperors would carefully add new legions, as circumstances required or permitted, until the strength of the standing army stood at around 30 legions (hence the wry remark of the philosopher Favorinus that It is ill arguing with the master of 30 legions). With each legion having 5,120 legionaries usually supported by an equal number of auxiliary troops (according to Tacitus), the total force available to a legion commander during the Pax Romana probably ranged from 11,000 downwards, with the more prestigious legions and those stationed on hostile borders or in restive provinces tending to have more auxiliaries. By the time of the emperor Severus, 193-211, the auxiliaries may have composed 55 to 60% of the army, 250,000 of 447,000. Some legions may have even been reinforced at times with units making the associated force near 15,000–16,000 or about the size of a modern division. Throughout the imperial era, the legions played an important political role. Their actions could secure the empire for a usurper or take it away. For example, the defeat of Vitellius in the Year of the Four Emperors was decided when the Danubian legions chose to support Vespasian. In the empire, the legion was standardized, with symbols and an individual history where men were proud to serve. The legion was commanded by a legatus or legate. Aged around thirty, he would usually be a senator on a three-year appointment. Immediately subordinate to the legate would be six elected military tribunes – five would be staff officers and the remaining one would be a noble heading for the Senate (originally this tribune commanded the legion). There would also be a group of officers for the medical staff, the engineers, record-keepers, the praefectus castrorum (commander of the camp) and other specialists such as priests and musicians. Later Empire (from 284 AD)[edit] Main article: Late Roman army See also: List of Roman legions A re-enactor, portraying a legionary at the end of the 3rd century Map of Roman legions by 212 AD.[6] In the Later Roman Empire, the number of legions was increased and the Roman Army expanded. There is no evidence to suggest that legions changed in form before the Tetrarchy, although there is evidence that they were smaller than the paper strengths usually quoted. The final form of the legion originated with the elite legiones palatinae created by Diocletian and the Tetrarchs. These were infantry units of around 1,000 men rather than the 5,000, including cavalry, of the old Legions. The earliest legiones palatinae were the Lanciarii, Joviani, Herculiani and Divitenses.[citation needed] The 4th century saw a very large number of new, small legions created, a process which began under Constantine II. In addition to the elite palatini, other legions called comitatenses and pseudocomitatenses, along with the auxilia palatina, provided the infantry of late Roman armies. The Notitia Dignitatum lists 25 legiones palatinae, 70 legiones comitatenses, 47 legiones pseudocomitatenses and 111 auxilia palatina in the field armies, and a further 47 legiones in the frontier armies.[7] Legion names such as Honoriani and Gratianenses found in the Notitia suggest that the process of creating new legions continued through the 4th century rather than being a single event. The names also suggest that many new legions were formed from vexillationes or from old legions. In addition, there were 24 vexillationes palatini, 73 vexillationes comitatenses; 305 other units in the Eastern limitanei and 181 in the Western limitanei.[8] A rare instance of apparent direct continuity between the legions of the early Empire and those of the post-6th century army was Legion V Macedonica; created in 43 BC, recorded in the Notitia Dignitatum as a legione comitatense under the title of Quinta Macedonica and surviving in Egypt until the Arab conquest of 637 AD.[9] According to the late Roman writer Vegetius' De Re Militari, each century had a ballista and each cohort had an onager, giving the legion a formidable siege train of 59 Ballistae and 10 Onagers, each manned by 10 libritors (artillerymen) and mounted on wagons drawn by oxen or mules. In addition to attacking cities and fortifications, these would be used to help defend Roman forts and fortified camps (castra) as well. They would even be employed on occasion, especially in the later Empire, as field artillery during battles or in support of river crossings. Despite a number of organisational changes, the Legion system survived the fall of the Western Roman Empire. It was continued within the Eastern Roman Empire until the 7th century, when reforms begun by Emperor Heraclius to counter the increasing need for soldiers resulted in the Theme system. Despite this, the Eastern Roman/Byzantine armies continued to be influenced by the earlier Roman legions, and were maintained with similar levels of discipline, strategic prowess, and organization. Legionary ranks[edit] Aside from the rank and file legionary (who received the base wage of 10 assēs a day or 225 denarii a year), the following list describes the system of officers which developed within the legions from the Marian reforms (104 BC) until the military reforms of Diocletian (c. 290). Senior officers[edit] Legatus Augusti pro praetore, Imperial Legate: The commander of two or more legions. The Imperial Legate also served as the governor of the province in which the legions he commanded were stationed. Of Senatorial rank, the Imperial Legate was appointed by the Emperor and usually held command for 3 or 4 years. In the present time, an Imperial Legate would be called a General. Legatus legionis, Legion Legate: The overall legion commander. The post was usually filled by a senator, appointed by the emperor, who held command for 3 or 4 years, although he could serve for a much longer period. In a Roman province with only one legion, the legatus was also the provincial governor. In such circumstances, the Legatus was dual-hatted as both Legion Legate and Imperial Legate. The Legion Legate also served as commander of the auxiliary units attached to the legion though they were not formally a part of the legion's command structure. Tribunus laticlavius, Broad Band Tribune: Named for the broad striped tunic worn by men of senatorial rank, this tribune was appointed by the emperor or the Senate. Though generally young, he was more experienced than the tribuni angusticlavii, he served as second in command of the legion, behind the legate. Because of his age and inexperience he was not the actual second in command in battle, but if the legate died he would take command of the legion. Praefectus castrorum, Camp Prefect: The Camp Prefect was third in command of the legion. Generally he was a long serving veteran from a lower social status than the tribunii whom he outranked, and who previously had served as primus pilus and finished his 25 years with the legions. He was used as a senior officer in charge of training a legion, though he could also command a cohort of auxiliaires. Tribuni angusticlavii, Narrow Band Tribunes: Each legion had five lower ranking tribunes, who were normally from the equestrian class and had at least some years of prior military experience. They often served the role of administrative officers.[10] This tribunate was often a first, but optional, step in a young man's political career (see cursus honorum).[11] Centurions[edit] The rank of centurion was an officer grade that included many ranks, meaning centurions had very good prospects for promotion. The most senior centurion in a legion was known as the primus pilus (first file or spear), who directly commanded the first century of the first cohort and commanded the whole first cohort when in battle. Within the second to tenth cohorts, the commander of each cohort's first century was known as a pilus prior and was in command of his entire cohort when in battle. The seniority of the pilus prior centurions was followed by the five other century commanders of the first cohort, who were known as primi ordines. A historical reenactor in Roman centurion costume The six centuries of a normal cohort, were, in order of precedence: The forward hastati (forward spears) The rear hastati (rear spears) The forward principes (forward principal line) The rear principes (rear principal line) The forward triarii (forward third line) The rear triarii (rear third line) The centuries took their titles from the old use of the legion drawn up in three lines of battle using three classes of soldier. (Each century would then hold a cross-section of this theoretical line, although these century titles were now essentially nominal.) Each of the three lines is then sub-divided within the century into a more forward and a more rear century. Primus pilus, literally First File: The Primus Pilus was the commanding centurion of the first century, first cohort and the senior-most centurion of the entire legion. (Unlike other cohorts, the first cohort had only one javelin century, instead of a "front spear" and a "back spear" century.) The primus pilus had a chance of later becoming a Praefectus Castrorum. When the primus pilus retired, he would most likely gain entry into the equestrian class. He was paid 60 times the base wage. Primus Pilus were also paid more than an average centurion and like a narrowband tribune. Pilus prior: The "front file" centurions were the commanders of the 10 1st centuries within the legion, making them senior centurions of their respective cohorts. While the legion was in battle formation, the Pilus Prior was given command of their entire cohort. The Primus Pilus was also a Pilus Prior, and the most senior of all the centurions within the legion. These positions were usually held by experienced veteran soldiers who had been moved up within the ranks. This rank is subordinate to the Primus Pilus. Primi ordines: The "ranks of the first [cohort]" were the five centurions of the first cohort, and included the primus pilus. They, excluding the primus pilus, were paid 30 times the base wage. This rank is senior to all other centurions, save the primus pilus and pilus prior. Other centurions: Each legion had 59 or 60 centurions, one to command each century of the 10 cohorts. They were the backbone of the professional army and were the career soldiers who ran the day-to-day life of the soldiers and issued commands in the field. They were generally moved up from the ranks, but in some cases could be direct appointments from the emperor or other higher-ranking officials. The cohorts were ranked from the first to the tenth and the century within each cohort ranked from 1 to 6, with only five centuries in the first cohort (for a total of 59 centurions and the primus pilus). The century that each centurion commanded was a direct reflection of his rank: command of the 1st century of the first cohort was the highest, and the 6th century of the 10th cohort was the lowest. Paid ten times the basic wage. Lower ranks[edit] Optio: One for each centurion (59–60), they were appointed by the centurion from within the ranks to act as his second in command and were paid twice the basic wage. Equivalent to a modern First Sergeant.[12] Tesserarius: (Guard commander) One for each century. They acted as seconds to the Optios and were paid one and a half times the basic wage. Keeper of the watchword, administrative assistant to HQ Staff, third in command of a century. These men fought as normal soldiers when the century they were attached to was not in the vanguard. Equivalent to a modern Staff Sergeant. Decurion: Commanded a cavalry unit (turma) of 10 to 30 eques legionis.[12] Decanus: Commanded a contubernium or ten men tent party, eight soldiers and two non-combatants, equivalent to a Sergeant or Corporal. A group of four soldiers would be referred to as a Quaternion. Special duty posts[edit] Aquilifer: A single position within the legion. The aquilifer was the legion's standard– or Aquila (eagle)– bearer and was an enormously important and prestigious position. Losing the aquila was considered the greatest dishonor a legion could endure. This post therefore had to be filled with steady veteran soldiers, with an excellent understanding of the tactics of the legion. He was paid twice the basic wage. Signifer: Each century had a signifer (thus, there were 59 in a legion) and within each cohort the 1st century's signifer would be the senior. He was standard-bearer for the centurial signum, a spear shaft decorated with medallions and topped with an open hand to signify loyalty, which was a rallying point for the soldiers. In addition to carrying the signum, the signifer also assumed responsibility for the financial administration of the unit and functioned as the legionaries' banker. He was paid twice the basic wage. Cornicen (Horn blower): Worked hand in hand with the signifer drawing the attention of the men to the centurial signum and issuing the audible commands of the officers. He was paid twice the basic wage. Imaginifer: A special position from the time of Augustus onwards. Carried the standard bearing the image of the Emperor as a constant reminder of the troops' loyalty to him. He was paid twice the basic wage. Immunes: Immunes were legionary soldiers who possessed specialized skills, qualifying them for better pay and excusing them from labour and guard work. Engineers, artillerymen, musicians, clerks, quartermasters, drill and weapons instructors, carpenters, hunters, medical staff and military police were all immune soldiers. These men were still fully trained legionaries, however, and were called upon to serve in the battle lines when needed. Evocatus: A veteran of the Roman army who had earned his military diploma for military service, but had chosen to re-enlist. They received double pay and were excluded from regular duties, such as manual labour. Duplicarius: A special pay grade that could also be awarded regardless of rank, received double the basic pay. Pay[edit] From the time of Gaius Marius onwards, legionaries received 225 denarii a year (equal to 900 Sestertii); this basic rate remained unchanged until Domitian, who increased it to 300 denarii. In spite of the steady inflation during the 2nd century, there was no further rise until the time of Septimius Severus, who increased it to 500 denarii a year. However, the soldiers did not receive all the money in cash, as the state deducted a clothing and food tax from their pay. To this wage, a legionary on active campaign would hope to add the booty of war, from the bodies of their enemies and as plunder from enemy settlements. Slaves could also be claimed from the prisoners of war and divided amongst the legion for later sale, which would bring in a sizeable supplement to their regular pay. All legionary soldiers would also receive a praemia (veterans' benefits) on completion of their term of service of 25 years or more: a sizeable sum of money (3,000 denarii from the time of Augustus) and/or a plot of good farmland (good land was in much demand); farmland given to veterans often helped in establishing control of the frontier regions and over rebellious provinces. Later, under Caracalla, the praemia increased to 5,000 denarii. Symbols[edit] From 104 BC onwards, each legion used an aquila (eagle) as its standard symbol. The symbol was carried by an officer known as aquilifer, and its loss was considered to be a very serious embarrassment, and often led to the disbanding of the legion itself. Normally, this was because any legion incapable of regaining its eagle in battle was so severely mauled that it was no longer effective in combat.[13] Reenacters portraying Roman legionaries of Legio XV Apollinaris. In Gallic War (Bk IV, Para. 25), Julius Caesar describes an incident at the start of his first invasion of Britain in 55 BC that illustrated how fear for the safety of the eagle could drive Roman soldiers. When Caesar's troops hesitated to leave their ships for fear of the Britons, the aquilifer of the tenth legion threw himself overboard and, carrying the eagle, advanced alone against the enemy. His comrades, fearing disgrace, 'with one accord, leapt down from the ship' and were followed by troops from the other ships. With the birth of the Roman Empire, the legions created a bond with their leader, the emperor himself. Each legion had another officer, called imaginifer, whose role was to carry a pike with the imago (image, sculpture) of the emperor as pontifex maximus. Each legion, furthermore, had a vexillifer who carried a vexillum or signum, with the legion name and emblem depicted on it, unique to the legion. It was common for a legion to detach some sub-units from the main camp to strengthen other corps. In these cases, the detached subunits carried only the vexillum, and not the aquila, and were called, therefore, vexillationes. A miniature vexillum, mounted on a silver base, was sometimes awarded to officers as a recognition of their service upon retirement or reassignment. Civilians could also be rewarded for their assistance to the Roman legions. In return for outstanding service, a citizen was given an arrow without a head. This was considered a great honour and would bring the recipient much prestige. Discipline[edit] Main article: Roman military decorations and punishments The military discipline of the legions was quite harsh. Regulations were strictly enforced, and a broad array of punishments could be inflicted upon a legionary who broke them. Many legionaries became devotees in the cult of the minor goddess Disciplina, whose virtues of frugality, severity and loyalty were central to their code of conduct and way of life. Minor punishments[edit] Castigatio – being hit by the centurion with his staff or animadversio fustium (Tac. Annals I, 23) – Reduction of rations or to be forced to eat barley instead of the usual grain ration Pecuniaria mulcta – Reduction in pay, fines or deductions from the pay allowance – Flogging in front of the century, cohort or legion – Whipping with the flagrum (flagellum, flagella), or "short whip" – a much more brutal punishment than simple flogging. The "short whip" was used by slave volunteers, volones, who constituted the majority of the army in the later years of the Roman Empire. Gradus deiectio – Reduction in rank Missio ignominiosa – Dishonourable discharge – Loss of time in service advantages Militiae mutatio – Relegation to inferior service or duties. Munerum indictio – Additional duties Major punishments[edit] Fustuarium – a sentence for desertion or dereliction of duty. The legionary would be stoned or beaten to death by cudgels, in front of the assembled troops, by his fellow soldiers or those whose lives had been put in danger. Soldiers under sentence of fustuarium who escaped were not pursued but lived under sentence of banishment from Rome. In the event that a group of legionaries are to be subjected to this punishment, the Tribune would make an alteration in order to spare the majority of the accused. The Tribune would first select a handful of the guilty men, and those selected would be condemned to the original penalty under the Fustuarium. The remainder of the accused would then be driven out of the camp and forced to live in an undefended location for a chosen period of time; they were also limited to eating only barley. [14] Decimation – According to 17th century belief[15][failed verification](possibly folk etymology[citation needed]), the Romans practiced this punishment in which a sentence was carried out against an entire unit that had mutinied, deserted, or shown dereliction of duty. One out of every ten men, chosen by lots, would be beaten to death, usually by the other nine with their bare hands, who would be forced to live outside the camp and in some instances obliged to renew the military oath, the sacramentum.[citation needed] Factors in the legion's success[edit] Play media Reenactment: Training Montesquieu wrote that "the main reason for the Romans becoming masters of the world was that, having fought successively against all peoples, they always gave up their own practices as soon as they found better ones."[16] Examples of ideas that were copied and adapted include weapons like the gladius (Iberians) and warship design (cf. Carthaginians' quinquereme), as well as military units, such as heavy mounted cavalry and mounted archers (Parthians and Numidians). Roman organization was more flexible than those of many opponents. Over time, the legions effectively handled challenges ranging from cavalry, to guerrillas, and to siege warfare. Roman discipline (cf. decimation (Roman army)), organization and systematization sustained combat effectiveness over a longer period. These elements appear throughout the legion in training, logistics, field fortification etc. The Romans were more persistent and more willing to absorb and replace losses over time than their opponents. Wars with Carthage and the Parthians and most notably, the campaigns against Pyrrhus of Epirus, illustrate this. Roman leadership was mixed, but over time it was often effective in securing Roman military success. The influence of Roman military and civic culture, as embodied particularly in the heavy infantry legion, gave the Roman military consistent motivation and cohesion.[citation needed] Strict, and more importantly, uniform discipline made commanding, maintaining, and replacing Roman legionaries a much more consistent exercise. Roman military equipment (cf. Roman military personal equipment), particularly armor, was more withstanding and far more ubiquitous, especially in the late Republican and Early Imperial era, than that of most of their opponents. Soldiers equipped with shields, helmets and highly effective body armor had a major advantage over warriors protected, in many cases, with nothing other than their shields, particularly in a prolonged engagement. Roman engineering skills were second to none in ancient Europe, and their mastery of both offensive and defensive siege warfare, specifically the construction and investiture of fortifications (cf. sudis, castra), was another major advantage for the Roman legions. Roman military training focused on the more effective thrusting of the sword rather than the slash. See also[edit] Ancient Rome portal War portal Auxiliaries (Roman military) Early Roman army Imperial Roman army Late Roman army Legionary List of Roman wars List of Roman battles List of topics related to ancient Rome List of Roman legions List of Roman auxiliary regiments Military history of ancient Rome Marian Roman army Roman army Roman army of the mid-Republic Roman military personal equipment Structural history of the Roman military For a more detailed analysis, as well as the Romans in battle, see the articles Roman infantry tactics and Roman military personal equipment. References[edit] Citations[edit] ^ Cornell, T. J. (1995): The Beginnings of Rome ^ a b Manousos Kambouris, Spyros Bakas (2016). "Greco-Macedonian influences in the manipular Legion system". Archaeology and Science. 11 2015: 145–154. ^ Data in: Goldsworthy, Adrian (2003). Complete Roman Army. pp. 95–95; Holder, Paul (1980). Studies in the Auxilia of the Roman Army. pp. 86–96; Elton, Hugh (1996). Frontiers of the Roman empire. pp 123. See table in article "Auxiliaries (Roman military)" for compilation of this data. ^ Livy, Ab urbe condita, 2.30 ^ Mccall, Jeremiah B. The Cavalry of the Roman Republic: Cavalry Combat and Elite Reputations in the Middle and Late Republic. (New York, Routledge, 2002) pp. 53ff ^ "Map". .hypotheses.org. ^ Totals from summary of Notitia Dignitatum in Richardot, Philippe, La fin de l'armée romaine 284–476 [3rd ed.] Economica, 2005. ISBN 2-7178-4861-4. ^ Jones, Later Roman Empire, pp. 1449–50 ^ Esposito, Gabriele (3 May 2016). The Late Roman Army. p. 77. ISBN 978-0-9963657-9-6. ^ Bowman, Garnsey, Rathbone (eds) The Cambridge Ancient History, Volume 11 pp. 326–27 ^ Birley, Anthony R. Septimius Severus: The African Emperor. (New Haven, Yale University Press, 1989) p. 40 ^ a b Caesar's Civil War, Adrian Goldsworthy, p. 20 ^ Several Authors (17 December 2015). History of The Roman Legions: History of Rome. Self-Publish. pp. 1069–. GGKEY:DXPWT430TXP. ^ Edwards, H. J. "The Histories of Polybius: Fragments of Book VI p.357". The University of Chicago. Retrieved April 2, 2020. ^ "It's totally fine to use 'decimate' as a synonym for 'devastate'. This is why". Merriam-Webster. Retrieved October 24, 2018. ^ Montesquieu C., Considerations on the Causes of the Greatness of the Romans and Their Decline, Hacket, 1999, p. 24 Bibliography[edit] The Encyclopedia of Ancient History, Legions, history and location of History of the Art of War. Vol 1. Ancient Warfare, Hans Delbrück Roman Warfare, Adrian Goldsworthy A History of Warfare, John Keegan The Roman Army and Greece and Rome at War, Peter Connolly The Encyclopedia Of Military History: From 3500 B.C. To The Present. (2nd Revised Edition 1986), R. Ernest Dupuy, and Trevor N. Dupuy. War, Gwynne Dyer. The Evolution of Weapons and Warfare, Trevor N. Dupuy. Flavius Vegetius Renatus, De Re Militari (with English translation on-line) Julius Caesar, The Gallic War William Smith, D.C.L., LL.D.: A Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities, John Murray, London, 1875. The Punic Wars, Adrian Goldsworthy. Carnage and Culture, Victor Davis Hanson The Fall of the Roman Empire: The Military Explanation, by Arther Ferrill, 1988 The Complete Roman Army, by Adrian Goldsworthy The Military System Of The Romans, by Albert Harkness From the Rise of the Republic and the Might of the Empire to the Fall of the West, by Nigel Rodgers The Roman Army at War 100 BC – AD 200 (Oxford, September 1998) by Adrian Goldsworthy The Beginnings of Rome: Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars (c.1000-264 BC) (Routledge 1995) by T. J. Cornell "Legion GmbH. Das Unternehmen Römische Armee" (Saarbrücken 2012) by Stefan Zehnter "Roman Infantry Tactics in the mid-Republic: A Reassessment"( Historia 63, 2014) by Michael J. Taylor [1] External links[edit] Wikimedia Commons has media related to Roman legion. The Roman Army: A Bibliography (Dr. J. P. Adams) Augustan Legionaries – legions and legionaries in the age of Augustus The Last Legion – the legions of the fifth to seventh centuries AD UNRV's Roman Military Legio X – Legio X Gemina (Equites) – "Viri Clarissimi" ^ Addison, Bickham, Diamond, Thompson, Penny, Christian, Anthony, Steve (2008). Humanities Dimensions History. 20 Thrackray Road, Port Melbourne, Victoria 3207: Pearson Education Australia. p. 135. ISBN 978-0-7339-8924-7.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: location (link) Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Roman_legion&oldid=992923258" Categories: Military of ancient Rome Military units and formations of the Roman Empire Military units and formations of the Roman Republic Military units and formations by size Roman legions Hidden categories: CS1: long volume value Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata Articles needing additional references from November 2008 All articles needing additional references All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from October 2020 All articles with failed verification Articles with failed verification from July 2019 Articles with unsourced statements from July 2019 Articles with unsourced statements from September 2014 Commons category link is on Wikidata Articles containing video clips CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list CS1 maint: location Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Languages Alemannisch العربية Azərbaycanca বাংলা Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ Български Bosanski Brezhoneg Català Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français Gaeilge Gàidhlig Galego 한국어 Հայերեն हिन्दी Hrvatski Bahasa Indonesia Interlingua Italiano עברית ქართული Latina Lietuvių Magyar Македонски Монгол Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Occitan Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча Polski Português Română Русский Scots Simple English Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Tagalog Türkçe Українська Tiếng Việt 吴语 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 7 December 2020, at 20:52 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2740 ---- List of Roman wars and battles - Wikipedia List of Roman wars and battles From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Wikimedia list article See also: List of Roman civil wars and revolts Part of a series on the Military of ancient Rome 753 BC – AD 476 Structural history Army Unit types and ranks Decorations and punishments Legions Auxilia Generals Navy Fleets Admirals Campaign history Wars and battles Technological history Military engineering Castra Siege engines Triumphal arches Roads Political history   Strategy and tactics Infantry tactics Frontiers and fortifications Limes Limes Britannicus Antonine Wall Hadrian's Wall Saxon Shore Limes Germanicus Alb Limes Lauter Valley Limes Lower Germanic Limes Main Limes Neckar-Odenwald Limes Upper Germanic-Rhaetian Limes Wetterau Limes Danube–Iller–Rhine Limes Norican Limes Claustra Alpium Iuliarum Pannonian Limes Limes Alutanus Limes Moesiae Trajan's Wall Anastasian Wall Limes Sarmatiae Limes Arabicus Limes Tripolitanus Limes Mauretaniae  Ancient Rome portal •  War portal v t e The following is a List of Roman wars and battles [1] fought by the ancient Roman Kingdom, Roman Republic and Roman Empire, organized by date. Contents 1 8th century BC 2 7th century BC 3 6th century BC 4 5th century BC 5 4th century BC 6 3rd century BC 7 2nd century BC 8 1st century BC 9 1st century 10 2nd century 11 3rd century 12 4th century 13 5th century 14 References 15 Sources 16 External links 17 See also 8th century BC[edit] The city of Rome in 753 BC Wars with the Latins and the Sabines War with Fidenae and Veii 7th century BC[edit] Second war with Fidenae and Veii Second Sabine War Roman–Latin wars 6th century BC[edit] 508 BC Siege by Etruscans (forces in blue) of Rome (forces in red). Pometian Revolt (503–502 BC) 502 BC – Battle of Pometia – The Romans put down the revolt of Pometia and Cora. Roman-Sabine wars Roman-Etruscan wars 509 BC – Battle of Silva Arsia – The Romans defeated the forces of Tarquinii and Veii led by the deposed king Lucius Tarquinius Superbus. One of the Roman consuls, Lucius Junius Brutus, is killed in battle. War with the Volsci War with Gabii War with the Rutuli 5th century BC[edit] First Latin War (498–493 BC) 497 BC – Battle of Lake Regillus – Aulus Postumius Albus Regillensis defeats Tarquinius Superbus. 495 BC – Battle of Aricia – consul Publius Servilius Priscus Structus defeats the Aurunci. War with the Volsci and the Aequi 482 BC – Battle of Antium – the Volsci defeat consul Lucius Aemilius Mamercus. 482 BC – Battle of Longula – consul Lucius Aemilius Mamercus defeats the Volsci the day after his defeat in the Battle of Antium. 458 BC – Battle of Mount Algidus – Cincinnatus defeats the Aequi 446 BC – Battle of Corbio – Titus Quinctius Capitolinus Barbatus leads Roman troops to defeat the Aequi and the Volsci. 480 BC – Battle of Veii (480 BC) – Consuls Marcus Fabius Vibulanus and Gnaeus Manlius Cincinnatus win heavy battle against Veians and their Etruscan allies. Gnaeus Manlius Cincinnatus and former consul Quintus Fabius are slain. 477 BC – Battle of the Cremera – All the Fabii except Quintus Fabius Vibulanus are killed in battle with the Veii|Veians Battle of the Temple of Hope – Consul Gaius Horatius Pulvillus fights indecisive battle with the Etruscans Battle of Colline Gate (477 BC) – Consul Gaius Horatius Pulvillus has indecisive victory over the Etruscan civilization|Etruscans soon after the Battle of the Temple of Hope 4th century BC[edit] Roman-Etruscan Wars 396 BC – Battle of Veii – Romans complete conquest of Etruscans Battle of Allia River (390 BC) – Gauls defeat the Romans, then sack Rome. First Samnite War (343–341 BC) 342 BC – Battle of Mount Gaurus – Roman general Marcus Valerius Corvus defeats the Samnites. 341 BC – Battle of Suessula – Roman consul Marcus Valerius Corvus defeats the Samnites once more. Latin War (340–338 BC) 339 BC – Battle of Vesuvius – Romans under P. Decius Mus and T. Manlius Imperiosus Torquatus defeat the rebellious Latins. 338 BC – Battle of Trifanum – Roman general T. Manlius Imperiosus Torquatus decisively defeats the Latins. Second Samnite War (326–304 BC) 321 BC – Battle of the Caudine Forks – Romans under Spurius Postumius Albinus and T. Verturius Calvinus are defeated by the Samnites under Gaius Pontius. 316 BC – Battle of Lautulae – Romans are defeated by the Samnites. 305 BC – Battle of Bovianum – Roman consuls M. Fulvius and L. Postumius decisively defeat the Samnites. 310 BC – Battle of Lake Vadimo – Romans, led by dictator Lucius Papirius Cursor, defeat the Etruscans. 3rd century BC[edit] Roman conquest of Italy through the Latin War (red), Samnite Wars (pink/orange), Pyrrhic War (beige), and Punic Wars (green). Third Samnite War (298–290 BC) 298 BC – Battle of Camerinum – Samnites defeat the Romans under Lucius Cornelius Scipio Barbatus. 297 BC – Battle of Tifernum – Romans under Quintus Fabius Maximus and Lucius Cornelius Scipio Barbatus defeat the Samnite army led by Gellius Statius 295 BC – Battle of Sentinum – Romans under Fabius Rullianus and Publius Decimus Mus defeat the Samnites and their Etruscan and Gallic allies, forcing the Etruscans, Gauls, and Umbrians to make peace 293 BC – Battle of Aquilonia – Romans decisively defeat the Samnites. Wars with Gauls and Etruscans (285–282 BC) 284 BC – Battle of Arretium – A Roman army under Lucius Caecilius is destroyed by the Gauls. 283 BC – Battle of Lake Vadimo – A Roman army under P. Cornelius Dolabella defeats the Etruscans and Gauls. 282 BC – Battle of Populonia – Etruscan resistance to Roman domination of Italy is finally crushed. Pyrrhic War (280–275 BC) [1] 280 BC – Battle of Heraclea – First engagement of Roman and Greek armies, the latter led by Pyrrhus of Epirus, who is victorious, but at great cost. 279 BC – Battle of Asculum – Pyrrhus again defeats the Romans but once again suffers significant casualties in the process. 275 BC – Battle of Beneventum – Inconclusive encounter between Pyrrhus and the Romans under Manius Curius. First Punic War (264–241 BC) [1] 261 BC – Battle of Agrigentum – Carthaginian forces under Hannibal Gisco and Hanno are defeated by the Romans, who attain control of most of Sicily. 260 BC - Battle of the Lipari Islands – A Roman naval force is defeated by the Carthaginians. Battle of Mylae – A Roman naval force under C. Duillius defeats the Carthaginian fleet, giving Rome control of the western Mediterranean. 258 BC – Battle of Sulci – Minor Roman victory against the Carthaginian fleet near Sardinia. 257 BC – Battle of Tyndaris – Naval victory of Rome over Carthage in Sicilian waters. 256 BC – Battle of Cape Ecnomus – A Carthaginian fleet under Hamilcar and Hanno is defeated in an attempt to stop a Roman invasion of Africa by Marcus Atilius Regulus. Battle of Adys – Romans under Regulus defeat the Carthaginians in North Africa 255 BC – Battle of Tunis – Carthaginians under Xanthippus, a Greek mercenary, defeat the Romans under Regulus, who is captured. 251 BC – Battle of Panormus – Carthaginian forces under Hasdrubal are defeated by the Romans under L. Caecilius Metellus. 250 BC - Siege of Lilybaeum - Siege on the Carthaginian city of Lilybaeum by Roman army under Gaius Atilius Regulus Serranus and Lucius Manlius Vulso Longus. Carthaginian victory. 249 BC – Battle of Drepana – Carthage under Adherbal defeat the fleet of Roman admiral Publius Claudius Pulcher. 242 BC – Battle of the Aegates Islands – Roman sea victory over the Carthaginians. First Illyrian War (229–228 BC) [1] Second Illyrian War (220–219 BC) [1] Second Punic War (218–201 BC) [1] 218 BC – Battle of Lilybaeum – First naval clash between the navies of Carthage and Rome during the Second Punic War. Battle of Cissa – Romans defeat Carthaginians near Tarraco and gain control of the territory north of the Ebro River. Battle of the Ticinus – Hannibal defeats the Romans under Publius Cornelius Scipio the elder in a cavalry fight. Battle of the Trebia – Hannibal defeats the Romans under Tiberius Sempronius Longus with the use of an ambush. 217 BC - Battle of Ebro River – In a surprise attack, Romans defeat and capture the Carthaginian fleet in Hispania. Battle of Lake Trasimene – In another ambush, Hannibal destroys the Roman army of Gaius Flaminius, who is killed. Battle of Ager Falernus – Avoiding destruction with deceit, Hannibal escapes Fabius' trap in this small skirmish. 216 BC – Battle of Cannae – Hannibal destroys the main Roman army of Lucius Aemilius Paulus and Publius Terentius Varro in what is considered one of the great masterpieces of the tactical art. First Battle of Nola – Roman general Marcus Claudius Marcellus holds off an attack by Hannibal. 215 BC – Second Battle of Nola – Marcellus again repulses an attack by Hannibal. 214 BC – Third Battle of Nola – Marcellus fights an inconclusive battle with Hannibal. 212 BC – First Battle of Capua – Hannibal defeats the consuls Q. Fulvius Flaccus and Appius Claudius, but the Roman army escapes Battle of the Silarus – Hannibal destroys the army of the Roman praetor M. Centenius Penula. Battle of Herdonia – Hannibal destroys the Roman army of the praetor Gnaeus Fulvius. 211 BC – Battle of the Upper Baetis – Publius and Gnaeus Cornelius Scipio are killed in battle with the Carthaginians under Hasdrubal Barca Second Battle of Capua – Hannibal is not able to break the Roman siege of the city. 210 BC – Second Battle of Herdonia – Hannibal destroys the Roman army of Fulvius Centumalus, who is killed. Battle of Numistro – Hannibal defeats Marcellus once more 209 BC – Battle of Asculum – Hannibal once again defeats Marcellus, in an indecisive battle 208 BC – Battle of Baecula – Romans in Hispania (Iberia) under P. Cornelius Scipio the Younger defeat Hasdrubal Barca. 207 BC – Battle of Grumentum – Roman general Gaius Claudius Nero fights an indecisive battle with Hannibal. Battle of the Metaurus – Hasdrubal is defeated and killed by Nero's Roman army. Battle of Carmona – Romans under Publius Cornelius Scipio besiege the city of Carmona and take it from Hasdrubal Gisco 206 BC – Battle of Ilipa – Scipio again decisively defeats the remaining Carthaginian forces in Hispania. Battle of the Guadalquivir – Roman army under Gaius Lucius Marcius Séptimus defeats a Carthaginian army under Hannón at Guadalquivir. Battle of Carteia – Roman fleet under Gaius Laelius defeats a Carthaginian fleet under Adherbal 204 BC – Battle of Crotona – Hannibal fights a drawn battle against the Roman general Sempronius in Southern Italy. 203 BC – Battle of Bagbrades – Romans under Scipio defeat the Carthaginian army of Hasdrubal Gisco and Syphax. Hannibal is sent to return to Africa. 202 BC, 19 October – Battle of Zama – Scipio Africanus Major decisively defeats Hannibal in North Africa, ending the Second Punic War. First Macedonian War (214–205 BC) [1] Roman-Gallic wars (225–200 BC) 225 BC – Battle of Faesulae – Romans are defeated by the Gauls of Northern Italy. 224 BC – Battle of Telamon – Romans under Aemilius Papus and Gaius Atilius Regulus defeat the Gauls. 222 BC – Battle of Clastidium – Romans under Marcus Claudius Marcellus defeat the Gauls. 200 BC – Battle of Cremona – Roman forces defeat the Gauls of Cisalpine Gaul [1] Expansion of Rome by 200 BC 2nd century BC[edit] Second Macedonian War (200–196 BC) 198 BC – Battle of the Aous – Roman forces under Titus Quinctius Flamininus defeat the Macedonians under Philip V 197 BC – Battle of Cynoscephalae – Romans under Flamininus decisively defeats Philip in Thessaly Roman-Spartan War (195 BC) 195 BC – Battle of Gythium – With some Roman assistance, Philopoemen of the Achaean League defeats the Spartans under Nabis Battle of Placentia (194 BC) – Roman victory over the Boian Gauls Battle of Mutina (193 BC) – Roman victory over the Boii, decisively ending the Boian threat. Roman-Seleucid War (192 BC – 188 BC) [1] 191 BC – Battle of Thermopylae – Romans under Manius Acilius Glabrio defeat Antiochus III the Great and force him to evacuate Greece 190 BC – Battle of the Eurymedon – Roman forces under Lucius Aemilius Regillus defeat a Seleucid fleet commanded by Hannibal, fighting his last battle. Battle of Myonessus – Another Seleucid fleet is defeated by the Romans December, Battle of Magnesia – (near Smyrna) Romans under Lucius Cornelius Scipio and his brother Scipio Africanus Major defeat Antiochus III the Great in the decisive victory of the war. Aetolian War (191–189 BC) Galatian War (189 BC) [1] Battle of Mount Olympus – Romans under Gnaeus Manlius Vulso allied with Attalus II of Pergamum deliver a crushing defeat to an army of Galatian Gauls Battle of Ancyra – Gnaeus Manlius Vulso and Attalus II defeat the Galatian Gauls again before Ancyra, in what was an almost identical repeat of the Battle of Mount Olympus. First Celtiberian War (181–179 BC) 181 BC – Battle of Manlian Pass – Romans under Fulvius Flaccus defeat an army of Celtiberians. Third Macedonian War (171–168 BC) 171 BC – Battle of Callicinus – Perseus of Macedon defeats a Roman army under Publius Licinius Crassus. 168 BC, 22 June – Battle of Pydna – Romans under Lucius Aemilius Paullus Macedonicus defeat and capture Macedonian King Perseus. Third Illyrian War (169–167 BC) [1] Lusitanian War (155–139 BC) Numentine\Second Celtiberian War (154–133 BC) 134 BC - Siege of Numantia - Roman forces under Scipio Aemilianus Africanus defeat and raze the Celtiberian city of Numantia. Fourth Macedonian War (150–148 BC) [1] 148 BC – Second battle of Pydna – The forces of the Macedonian pretender Andriscus are defeated by the Romans under Quintus Caecilius Metellus Macedonicus. Third Punic War (149–146 BC) [1] 147 BC - Battle of the Port of Carthage - Roman forces under Lucius Hostilius Mancinus are defeated by the Carthaginians. Second Battle of Neferis - Roman forces under Scipio Aemilianus win a decisive victory against Carthage marking the turning point in the Third Punic War. 146 BC – Battle of Carthage ends: Scipio Africanus Minor captures and destroys Carthage. Achaean War (146 BC) 146 BC – Battle of Corinth – Romans under Lucius Mummius defeat the Achaean League forces of Critolaus, who is killed. Corinth is destroyed and Greece comes under direct Roman rule. First Servile War (135–132 BC) Cimbrian War (113–101 BC) 112 BC - Battle of Noreia - Roman force under Gnaeus Papirius Carbo are defeated by the Cimbri 109 BC – Battle of the Rhone River – Roman force under Marcus Junius Silanus are defeated by the Helvetii 107 BC – Battle of Burdigala – Roman forces under Lucius Cassius Longinus are defeated by the Helvetii 105 BC, 6 October – Battle of Arausio – Cimbri inflict a major defeat on the Roman army of Gnaeus Mallius Maximus 102 BC - Battle of Aquae Sextiae - Romans under Gaius Marius defeat Teutons, with mass suicides among the captured women. 101 BC - Battle of Vercellae – Romans under Gaius Marius defeat the Cimbri, who are entirely annihilated. Jugurthine War (112–105 BC) 108 BC – Battle of the Muthul – Roman forces under Caecilius Metellus fight indecisively against the forces of Jugurtha of Numidia Second Servile War (104–103 BC) 1st century BC[edit] Expansion of Rome from 200 BC (green) to 100 BC (orange). Roman holdings in the East (red), clients (pink), and other nations. Social War (91–88 BC)[1] 89 BC – Battle of Fucine Lake – Roman forces under Lucius Porcius Cato are defeated by the Italian rebels. 89 BC – Battle of Asculum – Roman army of C. Pompeius Strabo decisively defeats the rebels. First Mithridatic War (90–85 BC) 87 BC - 86 BC - Siege of Athens and Piraeus - Siege of Athens, which had sided with the Pontic invaders during the First Mithridatic War by Lucius Cornelius Sulla. Roman victory. 86 BC – Battle of Chaeronea – Roman forces of Lucius Cornelius Sulla defeat the Pontic forces of Archelaus in the First Mithridatic War 85 BC – Battle of Orchomenus – Sulla again defeats Archelaus in the decisive battle of the First Mithridatic War. First Marian-Sullan Civil War (88–87 BC)[1] 83 BC – Battle of Mount Tifata – Sulla defeats the popular forces of Caius Norbanus. Second Mithridatic War (83–82 BC) 82 BC – Battle of Halys – Roman general Lucius Licinius Murena fights Mithridates and Gordius after launching several raids, to which the Romans lose. Sertorian War (80–72 BC) 80 BC – Battle of the Baetis River – Rebel forces under Quintus Sertorius defeat the legal Roman forces of Lucius Fulfidias in Hispania. Second Marian-Sullan Civil War (82–81 BC) [1] 82 BC – Battle of the Asio River – Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius defeats a Popular army under Gaius Carrinas. Battle of Sacriporto – Fought between the Optimates under Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix and the Populares under Gaius Marius the Younger, Optimate victory. First Battle of Clusium – Fought between the Optimates under Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix and the Populares under Gnaeus Papirius Carbo, Popular victory. Battle of Faventia – Fought between the Optimates under Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius and the Populares under Gaius Norbanus Balbus, Optimate victory. Battle of Fidentia – Fought between the Optimates under Marcus Terentius Varro Lucullus and the Populares under Lucius Quincius, Optimate victory. Second Battle of Clusium – Pompei Magnus defeats a numerically superior Populares army under Gaius Carrinas and Gaius Marcius Censorinus. Battle of Colline Gate – Sulla defeats Samnites allied to the popular party in Rome in the decisive battle of the Civil War. Third Mithridatic War (73–63 BC) [1] 73 BC – Battle of Cyzicus – Roman forces under Lucius Lucullus defeat the forces of Mithridates VI of Pontus 72 BC – Battle of Cabira or the Rhyndacus – Lucullus defeats the retreating forces of Mithridates, opening way to Pontus 69 BC – Battle of Tigranocerta – Lucullus defeats the army of Tigranes II of Armenia, who was harbouring his father-in-law Mithridates VI of Pontus 68 BC – Battle of Artaxata – Lucullus again defeats Tigranes. 66 BC – Battle of the Lycus – Pompey the Great decisively defeats Mithridates VI, effectively ending the Third Mithridatic War Third Servile War (73–71 BC) 73 BC – Battle of Mount Vesuvius – Spartacus defeats Gaius Claudius Glaber 72 BC – Battle of Picenum – Slave Revolt led by Spartacus defeat a Roman army led by Gellius Publicola and Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Clodianus 72 BC – Battle of Mutina I – Slave Revolt led by Spartacus defeat another army of Romans. 71 BC – Battle of Campania – Slave Revolt led by Spartacus defeat a Roman army. Battle of Campania II – a Roman army under Marcus Crassus defeats Spartacus's army of slaves. Battle of the Siler River – Marcus Crassus defeats the army of Spartacus. Pompey's Georgian campaign (65 BC) Catilinarian Civil War (63–62 BC) 62 BC, January – Battle of Pistoria – The forces of the conspirator Catiline are defeated by the loyal Roman armies under Gaius Antonius. Gallic Wars (59–51 BC) 58 BC – June – Battle of the Arar (Saône) – Caesar defeats the migrating Helvetii July – Battle of Bibracte – Caesar again defeats the Helvetians, this time decisively. September – Battle of Vosges – Caesar decisively defeats the forces of the Germanic chieftain Ariovistus near modern Belfort 57 BC – Battle of the Axona (Aisne) – Caesar defeats the forces of the Belgae under King Galba of Suessiones. Battle of the Sabis (Sambre) – Caesar defeats the Nervii. Battle of Octodurus (Martigny) – Servius Galba defeats the Seduni and Veragri. 52 BC – Battle of Alesia – Caesar defeats the Gallic rebel Vercingetorix, completing the Roman conquest of Gallia Comata. War with the Parthian Empire (53 BC) 53 BC - Battle of Carrhae – Roman triumvir Crassus is disastrously defeated and killed by the Parthians. Crassus has molten gold poured down his throat by his captors. The extent of the Roman Republic in 40 BC after Caesar's conquests. Caesar's Civil War (49–45 BC) 49 BC, June – Battle of Ilerda – Caesar's army surround Pompeian forces and cause them to surrender. 49 BC, 24 August – Battle of the Bagradas River – Caesar's general Gaius Curio is defeated in North Africa by the Pompeians under Attius Varus and King Juba I of Numidia. Curio commits suicide. 48 BC, 10 July – Battle of Dyrrhachium – Caesar barely avoids a catastrophic defeat by Pompey in Macedonia 48 BC, 9 August – Battle of Pharsalus – Caesar decisively defeats Pompey, who flees to Egypt 47 BC, February – Battle of the Nile – Caesar defeats the forces of the Egyptian king Ptolemy XIII 46 BC, 4 January – Battle of Ruspina – Caesar loses perhaps as much as a third of his army to Titus Labienus 46 BC, 6 February – Battle of Thapsus – Caesar defeats the Pompeian army of Metellus Scipio in North Africa. 45 BC, 17 March – Battle of Munda – In his last victory, Caesar defeats the Pompeian forces of Titus Labienus and Gnaeus Pompey the Younger in Hispania. Labienus is killed in the battle and the Younger Pompey captured and executed. War with Pontus 47 BC, May – Battle of Zela – Caesar defeats Pharnaces II of Pontus. This is the battle where he famously said Veni, vidi, vici. (I came, I saw, I conquered.) Liberators' civil war (44–42 BC) 43 BC, 14 April – Battle of Forum Gallorum – Antony, besieging Caesar's assassin Decimus Brutus in Mutina, defeats the forces of the consul Pansa, who is killed, but is then immediately defeated by the army of the other consul, Hirtius 43 BC, 21 April – Battle of Mutina – Antony is again defeated in battle by Hirtius, who is killed. Although Antony fails to capture Mutina, Decimus Brutus is murdered shortly thereafter. 42 BC, 3 October – First Battle of Philippi – Triumvirs Mark Antony and Octavian fight an indecisive battle with Caesar's assassins Marcus Brutus and Cassius. Although Brutus defeats Octavian, Antony defeats Cassius, who commits suicide. 42 BC, 23 October – Second Battle of Philippi – Brutus's army is decisively defeated by Antony and Octavian. Brutus escapes, but commits suicide soon after. Sicilian revolt (44–36 BC) 36 BC – Battle of Naulochus – Octavian's fleet, under the command of Marcus Vipsanius Agrippa defeats the forces of the rebel Sextus Pompeius. Fulvia's civil war (Perusine War) (41–40 BC) 41 BC – Battle of Perugia – Mark Antony's brother Lucius Antonius and his wife Fulvia are defeated by Octavian. Final War of the Roman Republic (32–30 BC) 31 BC, 2 September – Battle of Actium – Octavian decisively defeats Antony and Cleopatra in a naval battle near Greece. Cantabrian Wars (29–19 BC) 25 BC - Battle of Vellica - Roman forces under Augustus against the Cantabri people, Roman victory. 25 BC - Siege of Aracillum - Roman forces under Gaius Antistius Vetus against the Cantabri people, Roman victory. Germanic Battles (16–11 BC) Clades Lolliana (16 BC) – The troops of Consul Marcus Lollius Paulinus are defeated by West Germanic warriors in Gaul. Battle of the Lupia River (11 BC) – Roman forces under Augustus's stepson Drusus win a victory in Germany. 1st century[edit] The Roman Empire under Augustus: The Republic in 31 BC (yellow) and Augustus's conquests (shades of green). Client states are in pink. Battle of the Teutoburg Forest (9) – German leader Arminius ambushes three Roman legions under Publius Quinctilius Varus. Battle of the Weser River (16) - Legions under Germanicus defeat German tribes of Arminius. Roman conquest of Britain (43–96) 43 – Battle of the Medway – Claudius and general Aulus Plautius defeat a confederation of British Celtic tribes. Roman invasion of Britain begins 50 – Battle of Caer Caradoc – British chieftain Caractacus is defeated and captured by the Romans under Ostorius Scapula. 71 – Battle of Scotch Corner 83 – Battle of Mons Graupius. Romans under Gnaeus Julius Agricola defeat the Caledonians. Roman–Parthian War of 58–63 58 – Sack of Artaxata by Gnaeus Domitius Corbulo during the Roman–Parthian War over Armenia 59 – Capture of Tigranocerta by Corbulo. 62 – Battle of Rhandeia – Romans under Lucius Caesennius Paetus are defeated by a Parthian-Armenian army under King Tiridates of Parthia. Boudica's uprising (60–61) 60 – Battle of Camulodunum – Boudica begins her uprising against the Romans by capturing and then sacking Camulodunum then moves on Londinium. 61 – Battle of Watling Street – Boudica is defeated by Suetonius Paullinus First Jewish–Roman War (66–73)[1] 66 – Battle of Beth-Horon – Jewish forces led by Eleazar ben Simon defeat a Roman punitive force led by Cestius Gallus, Governor of Syria 73 – Siege of Masada – The Sicarii are defeated by the Romans under Lucius Flavius Silva, leading them to commit mass suicide Roman Civil War of 68–69 AD 69 – Winter – Battle of 'Forum Julii' – Othonian forces defeat a small group of Vitellianist auxiliaries in Gallia Narbonensis 14 April – First Battle of Bedriacum – Vitellius, commander of the Rhine armies, defeats Emperor Otho and seizes the throne. 24 October – Second Battle of Bedriacum – Forces under Antonius Primus, the commander of the Danube armies, loyal to Vespasian, defeat the forces of Emperor Vitellius. Domitian's Dacian War (86–88) 87 – Dacian King Decebalus crushes the Roman army at Tapae (today Transylvania, Romania), Legio V Alaudae and general Cornelius Fuscus perish in battle. 88 – the Romans return and obtain a victory in the same battleground 2nd century[edit] The extent of the Roman Empire under Trajan (117) The Empire is in red and dependencies are in pink.[2] First Dacian War (101–102) 101 – Second Battle of Tapae – Trajan defeats Decebalus, with heavy losses. 102 – Battle of Adamclisi - Roman forces led by Trajan annihilate a mixed Dacian-Roxolano-Sarmatae army, with heavy casualties on the Roman side. Second Dacian War (105–106) 106 – Battle of Sarmisegetusa – A Roman army led by Trajan conquers and destroys the Dacian capital. Part of Dacia is annexed to the Roman Empire. Roman-Persian Wars [1] 115-117 – Trajan's Parthian campaign – Trajan invades Parthia and occupies Ctesiphon. 161-166 – Roman–Parthian War – Vologases IV invades Armenia, but is pushed back and Ctesiphon is sacked. 198 – Battle of Ctesiphon – Septimus Severus invades, sacks Ctesiphon, and acquires northern Mesopotamia. Kitos War (115–117) Second Jewish Revolt (132–135/136) Marcomannic Wars (166–180) 170 – Battle of Carnuntum – Marcomannic King Ballomar defeats the Roman Army and invade Italy. 178-179 – Praetorian Prefect Teratenius Paternus defeats the Quadi. 179 or 180 – Battle of Laugaricio – Marcus Valerius Maximianus defeats the Quadi in Slovakia. Roman Civil War of 193–197 AD 193 – Battle of Cyzicus – Septimius Severus, the new Emperor, defeats his eastern rival Pescennius Niger 193 – Battle of Nicaea – Severus again defeats Niger 194 – Battle of Issus – Severus finally defeats Niger. 197, 19 February – Battle of Lugdunum – Emperor Septimius Severus defeats and kills his rival Clodius Albinus, securing full control over the Empire. 3rd century[edit] The Empires of Gaul (green), Rome (red), and Palmyra (yellow) in 271. See Crisis of the Third Century Persian wars 217 – Battle of Nisibis – Bloody stalemate between the Parthians and the Roman army under Emperor Macrinus. 231-232 - War between Ardashir I and Severus Alexander; resulted in humiliating Roman defeat and withdrawal. 243 – Battle of Resaena – Roman forces under Gordian III defeat the Persians under Shapur I. 260 – Battle of Edessa – Emperor Shapur I of Persia defeats and captures the Roman Emperor Valerian 296 or 297 – Battle of Carrhae – Romans under the Caesar Galerius are defeated by the Persians under Narseh. 298 – Battle of Satala – Galerius secures a decisive victory against Narseh, following a peace treaty. Civil wars 218, 8 June – Battle of Antioch – Varius Avitus defeats Emperor Macrinus to claim the throne under the name Elagabalus. 238 – Battle of Carthage – Troops loyal to the Roman Emperor Maximinus Thrax defeat and kill his successor Gordian II. 274 – Battle of Châlons – Aurelian defeats the Gallic usurper Tetricus, reestablishing central control of the whole empire. 285 – Battle of the Margus – The usurper Diocletian defeats the army of the Emperor Carinus, who is killed. Gothic and Alemannic wars 235 – Battle at the Harzhorn - Small Roman army defeats a German army while retreating back to Roman territory. 250 – Battle of Philippopolis – King Cniva of the Goths defeats a Roman army. 251, Summer – Battle of Abrittus – Goths defeat and kill the Roman Emperors Decius and Herennius Etruscus 259 – Battle of Mediolanum – Emperor Gallienus decisively defeats the Alemanni that invaded Italy 268 – Battle of Naissus – Emperor Gallienus and his generals Claudius and Aurelian decisively defeat the Goths. 268 or 269 – Battle of Lake Benacus – Romans under Emperor Claudius II defeat the Alemanni 271 – Battle of Placentia – Emperor Aurelian is defeated by the Alemanni forces invading Italy Battle of Fano – Aurelian defeats the Alamanni, who begin to retreat from Italy Battle of Pavia – Aurelian destroys the retreating Alemanni army. 298 – Battle of Lingones – Caesar Constantius Chlorus defeats the Alemanni Battle of Vindonissa – Constantius again defeats the Alamanni Palmyrene war 272 – Battle of Immae – Aurelian defeats the army of Zenobia of Palmyra Battle of Emesa – Aurelian decisively defeats Zenobia. 4th century[edit] The Roman Empire under the Tetrarchy, with the territory of Constantius (yellow), Maximian (green), Galerius (pink), and Diocletian (purple) The Roman Empire in 337, showing the Empire under Constantine (shaded purple) and other Roman dependencies (light purple). The 4th century begins with civil war resulting in the ascendancy of Constantine I, then, after his death, wars with Persia and Germanic tribes, punctuated frequently with more civil wars. Civil Wars of the Tetrarchy (306–324) 312 – Battle of Turin – Constantine I defeats forces loyal to Maxentius. Battle of Verona – Constantine I defeats more forces loyal to Maxentius. 28 October – Battle of Milvian Bridge – Constantine I defeats Maxentius and takes control of Italy. 313, 30 April – Battle of Tzirallum – In the eastern part of the Empire, the forces of Licinius defeat Maximinus. 314, 8 October – Battle of Cibalae – Constantine defeats Licinius 316 or 317 – Battle of Mardia – Constantine again defeats Licinius, who cedes Illyricum to Constantine. 324 – 3 July – Battle of Adrianople – Constantine defeats Licinius, who flees to Byzantium July – Battle of the Hellespont – Flavius Julius Crispus, son of Constantine, defeats the naval forces of Licinius 18 September – Battle of Chrysopolis – Constantine decisively defeats Licinius, establishing his sole control over the empire. Wars with Persia (344–363) 344 – Battle of Singara – Emperor Constantius II fights an indecisive battle against King Shapur II of Persia 359 – Siege of Amida – Sassanids capture Amida from Romans 363, 29 May – Battle of Ctesiphon – Emperor Julian defeats Shapur II of Persia outside the walls of the Persian capital, but is unable to take the city, and his death leads to an ultimate disaster on the retreat back to Roman territory. Civil War (350–353) 351 – Battle of Mursa Major – Emperor Constantius II defeats the usurper Magnentius 353 – Battle of Mons Seleucus – Final defeat of Magnentius by Constantius II Wars with Alemanni (356–368) 356 – Battle of Reims – Caesar Julian is defeated by the Alamanni 357 – Battle of Strasbourg – Julian expels the Alamanni from the Rhineland 368 – Battle of Solicinium – Romans under Emperor Valentinian I defeat yet another Alamanni incursion. Civil War – 366 – Battle of Thyatira – The army of the Roman emperor Valens defeats the usurper Procopius. Gothic War (376–382) 377 – Battle of the Willows – Roman troops fight an inconclusive battle against the Goths 378 – May – Battle of Argentovaria – Western Emperor Gratianus is victorious over the Alamanni, yet again. 9 August – Battle of Adrianople – Thervings under Fritigern defeat and kill the Eastern Emperor Valens 380 – Battle of Thessalonica – The new Eastern Emperor, Theodosius I, is also defeated by the Thervings under Fritigern. Civil War – 388 – Battle of the Save – Emperor Theodosius I defeats the usurper Magnus Maximus. Civil War – 394, 5–6 September – Battle of the Frigidus – Theodosius I defeats and kills the usurper Eugenius and his Frankish magister militum Arbogast. 5th century[edit] Map showing the paths of invasion by various groups into Eastern and Western Roman territory The 5th century involves the final fall of the Western Roman Empire to Goths, Vandals, Alans, Huns, and Franks. Wars with Gothic Tribes (402–419) 402 – 6 April – Battle of Pollentia – Stilicho defeats the Visigoths under Alaric. June – Battle of Verona – Stilicho defeats Alaric, who withdraws from Italy. 406, 31 December – Battle of Mainz – Franks lose to Vandals, Suebi and Alans. 410, 24 August – Sack of Rome – Visigoths under Alaric sack Rome. 419 – Battle of the Nervasos Mountains – Romans and Suebi defeat Vandals and Alans. 468 – Battle of Cap Bon - Failure of the invasion of the kingdom of the Vandals by the Western and Eastern Roman Empires Civil War – 432 – Battle of Ravenna – Bonifacius defeats rival Roman general Flavius Aetius, but is mortally wounded in the process. War with Visigoths – 436 – Battle of Narbonne – Flavius Aetius again defeats the Visigoths led by Theodoric. War with the Huns (447–451) 447 – Battle of the Utus – The Romans in the East fight an indecisive battle with Huns led by Attila. 451, 20 June – Battle of the Catalaunian Plains – The Romans with Flavius Aetius and the Visigoths with Theodoric, defend against Attila the Hun. Fall of the West (450–516) 455 – Sack of Rome by Geiseric, King of the Vandals 463 – Battle of Orleans – Gallo-Roman and Salian Frank forces under the command of Aegidius defeat a force of Visigoths at Orleans. 476 – Odoacer defeats the remnants of the Western Roman army, exiles emperor Romulus Augustulus, and declares himself King of Italy 486 – Battle of Soissons – Clovis I defeats Syagrius, last Roman commander in Gaul, and annexes the Roman rump state into the Frankish realm. 516 – Battle of Mons Badonicus – Romano-British under Ambrosius Aurelianus defeat Anglo-Saxons. References[edit] ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s Jones, Jim. "ROMAN HISTORY TIMELINE". courses.wcupa.edu. West Chester University of Pennsylvania, 2013. Retrieved 29 March 2017. ^ Bennett, J. Trajan: Optimus Princeps. 1997. Fig. 1 Sources[edit] Jones, Jim, (2013). Roman History Timeline. West Chester University of Pennsylvania. http://courses.wcupa.edu/jones/Roman History Timeline . External links[edit] Milites. A Visual Analytics tool on Roman battles. Elton, Hugh and Christos Nüssli, "Imperial Battle Map Index". An Online Encyclopedia of Roman Emperors. "Roman Battles" map, platial.com See also[edit] List of Roman civil wars and revolts v t e Ancient Roman wars Wars of the Roman Republic Roman–Etruscan Wars Roman-Aequian wars Roman–Latin wars Roman–Hernician wars Roman-Volscian wars Samnite Wars Pyrrhic War Punic Wars (First, Second, Third) Illyrian Wars (First, Second, Third) Macedonian Wars (First, Second, Third, Fourth) Roman–Seleucid War Aetolian War Galatian War Roman conquest of Hispania (Celtiberian Wars, Lusitanian War, Numantine War, Sertorian War, Cantabrian Wars) Achaean War Jugurthine War Cimbrian War Servile Wars (First, Second, Third) Social War Sulla's civil wars (First, Second) Mithridatic Wars (First, Second, Third) Gallic Wars Invasions of Britain Caesar's Civil War End of the Republic (Post-Caesarian, Liberators', Sicilian, Perusine, Last) Wars of the Roman Empire Germanic wars (Teutoburg, Marcomannic, Alemannic, Gothic, Visigothic) Wars in Britain Boudica's revolt Armenian War Civil War of 69 Jewish–Roman wars Domitian's Dacian War Trajan's Dacian Wars Persian Wars Civil Wars of the Third Century Wars of the Fall of the Western Roman Empire Military history of ancient Rome v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Roman_wars_and_battles&oldid=995668852" Categories: Lists of wars by country Wars involving ancient Rome Lists of battles Battles involving ancient Rome Timelines of military conflicts Ancient Rome-related lists Hidden categories: Articles with short description Short description matches Wikidata Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Български Español Français Frysk ქართული Latina Lietuvių Nederlands Română Српски / srpski Edit links This page was last edited on 22 December 2020, at 06:34 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2750 ---- Epicureanism - Wikipedia Epicureanism From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search "Epicurean" redirects here. For other uses, see Epicurean (disambiguation). Roman Epicurus bust Epicureanism is a system of philosophy founded around 307 BC based upon the teachings of the ancient Greek philosopher Epicurus. Epicureanism was originally a challenge to Platonism. Later its main opponent became Stoicism. Some writings by Epicurus have survived. Some scholars consider the epic poem De rerum natura (Latin for On the Nature of Things) by Lucretius to present in one unified work the core arguments and theories of Epicureanism. Many of the scrolls unearthed at the Villa of the Papyri at Herculaneum are Epicurean texts. At least some are thought to have belonged to the Epicurean philosopher Philodemus. Epicurus was an atomic materialist, following in the steps of Democritus. His materialism led him to a general attack on superstition and divine intervention. Following the Cyrenaic philosopher Aristippus, Epicurus believed that the greatest good was to seek modest, sustainable pleasure in the form of a state of ataraxia (tranquility and freedom from fear) and aponia (the absence of bodily pain) through knowledge of the workings of the world and limiting desires. Correspondingly, Epicurus and his followers shunned politics because it could lead to frustrations and ambitions which can directly conflict with the Epicurean pursuit for peace of mind and virtues.[1] Although Epicureanism is a form of hedonism insofar as it declares pleasure to be its sole intrinsic goal, the concept that the absence of pain and fear constitutes the greatest pleasure, and its advocacy of a simple life, make it very different from "hedonism" as colloquially understood. Epicureanism flourished in the Late Hellenistic era and during the Roman era, and many Epicurean communities were established, such as those in Antiochia, Alexandria, Rhodes, and Herculaneum. By the late 3rd century CE Epicureanism all but died out, being opposed by other philosophies (mainly Neoplatonism) that were now in the ascendant. Interest in Epicureanism was resurrected in the Age of Enlightenment and continues in the modern era. Contents 1 History 2 Philosophy 3 Ethics 4 Politics 5 Religion 6 Epicurean physics 7 Epistemology 8 Tetrapharmakos 9 Notable Epicureans 10 Modern usage and misconceptions 11 Criticism 12 See also 13 References 14 Further reading 15 External links History[edit] In Mytilene, the capital of the island Lesbos, and then in Lampsacus, Epicurus taught and gained followers. In Athens, Epicurus bought a property for his school called "Garden", later the name of Epicurus' school.[2] Its members included Hermarchus, Idomeneus, Colotes, Polyaenus, and Metrodorus. Epicurus emphasized friendship as an important ingredient of happiness, and the school seems to have been a moderately ascetic community which rejected the political limelight of Athenian philosophy. They were fairly cosmopolitan by Athenian standards, including women and slaves. Community activities held some importance, particularly the observance of Eikas, a monthly social gathering. Some members were also vegetarians as, from slender evidence, Epicurus did not eat meat, although no prohibition against eating meat was made.[3][4] The school's popularity grew and it became, along with Stoicism, Platonism, Peripateticism, and Pyrrhonism, one of the dominant schools of Hellenistic philosophy, lasting strongly through the later Roman Empire.[5] Another major source of information is the Roman politician and philosopher Cicero, although he was highly critical, denouncing the Epicureans as unbridled hedonists, devoid of a sense of virtue and duty, and guilty of withdrawing from public life. Another ancient source is Diogenes of Oenoanda, who composed a large inscription at Oenoanda in Lycia. Deciphered carbonized scrolls obtained from the library at the Villa of the Papyri in Herculaneum contain a large number of works by Philodemus, a late Hellenistic Epicurean, and Epicurus himself, attesting to the school's enduring popularity. Diogenes reports slanderous stories, circulated by Epicurus' opponents.[2] With growing dominance of Neoplatonism and Peripateticism, and later, Christianity, Epicureanism declined. By the late third century CE, there was little trace of its existence.[6] The early Christian writer Lactantius criticizes Epicurus at several points throughout his Divine Institutes. In Dante Alighieri's Divine Comedy, the Epicureans are depicted as heretics suffering in the sixth circle of hell. In fact, Epicurus appears to represent the ultimate heresy.[7] The word for a heretic in the Talmudic literature is "Apiqoros" (אפיקורוס‎).[citation needed] In the 17th century, the French Franciscan priest, scientist and philosopher Pierre Gassendi wrote two books forcefully reviving Epicureanism. Shortly thereafter, and clearly influenced by Gassendi, Walter Charleton published several works on Epicureanism in English. Attacks by Christians continued, most forcefully by the Cambridge Platonists.[citation needed] In the early modern period, scientists adopted atomist theories, while materialist philosophers embraced Epicurus' hedonist ethics and restated his objections to natural teleology.[citation needed] Philosophy[edit] Part of a series on Hedonism Thinkers Ajita Kesakambali Jeremy Bentham Julien Offray de La Mettrie Aristippus Epicurus Fred Feldman Theodorus the Atheist Michel Onfray Aristippus the Younger Hermarchus Lucretius Pierre Gassendi Metrodorus of Lampsacus David Pearce Zeno of Sidon Yang Zhu Torbjörn Tännsjö Esperanza Guisán Schools of hedonism Cārvāka Cyrenaics Epicureanism Christian hedonism Utilitarianism Yangism Key concepts Aponia Ataraxia Eudaimonia Happiness Hedone Pain Pleasure Sensation Suffering Tetrapharmakos Libertine Related articles Paradox of hedonism Hedonic treadmill v t e Epicureanism argued that pleasure was the chief good in life.[8] Hence, Epicurus advocated living in such a way as to derive the greatest amount of pleasure possible during one's lifetime, yet doing so moderately in order to avoid the suffering incurred by overindulgence in such pleasure.[8] Emphasis was placed on pleasures of the mind rather than on physical pleasures.[8] Unnecessary and, especially, artificially produced desires were to be suppressed.[9] Since the political life could give rise to desires that could disturb virtue and one's peace of mind, such as a lust for power or a desire for fame, participation in politics was discouraged.[10][11] Further, Epicurus sought to eliminate the fear of the gods and of death, seeing those two fears as chief causes of strife in life.[12] Epicurus actively recommended against passionate love, and believed it best to avoid marriage altogether. He viewed recreational sex as a natural, but not necessary desire that should be generally avoided.[13] The Epicurean understanding of justice was inherently self-interested. Justice was deemed good because it was seen as mutually beneficial.[14] Individuals would not act unjustly even if the act was initially unnoticed because of possibly being caught and punished.[15] Both punishment and fear of punishment would cause a person disturbance and prevent them from being happy.[15] Epicurus laid great emphasis on developing friendships as the basis of a satisfying life. of all the things which wisdom has contrived which contribute to a blessed life, none is more important, more fruitful, than friendship — quoted by Cicero[16] While the pursuit of pleasure formed the focal point of the philosophy, this was largely directed to the "static pleasures" of minimizing pain, anxiety and suffering. In fact, Epicurus referred to life as a "bitter gift". When we say ... that pleasure is the end and aim, we do not mean the pleasures of the prodigal or the pleasures of sensuality, as we are understood to do by some through ignorance, prejudice or wilful misrepresentation. By pleasure we mean the absence of pain in the body and of trouble in the soul. It is not by an unbroken succession of drinking bouts and of revelry, not by sexual lust, nor the enjoyment of fish and other delicacies of a luxurious table, which produce a pleasant life; it is sober reasoning, searching out the grounds of every choice and avoidance, and banishing those beliefs through which the greatest tumults take possession of the soul. — Epicurus, "Letter to Menoeceus"[17] Epicureanism rejects immortality. It believes in the soul, but suggests that the soul is mortal and material, just like the body.[18] Epicurus rejected any possibility of an afterlife, while still contending that one need not fear death: "Death is nothing to us; for that which is dissolved, is without sensation, and that which lacks sensation is nothing to us."[19] From this doctrine arose the Epicurean Epitaph: Non fui, fui, non sum, non curo ("I was not; I have been; I am not; I do not mind."), which is inscribed on the gravestones of his followers and seen on many ancient gravestones of the Roman Empire. This quotation is often used today at humanist funerals.[20] Ethics[edit] Epicureanism bases its ethics on a hedonistic set of values. In the most basic sense, Epicureans see pleasure as the purpose of life.[21] As evidence for this, Epicureans say that nature seems to command us to avoid pain, and they point out that all animals try to avoid pain as much as possible.[22] Epicureans had a very specific understanding of what the greatest pleasure was, and the focus of their ethics was on the avoidance of pain rather than seeking out pleasure.[23] Epicureanism divided pleasure into two broad categories: pleasures of the body and pleasures of the mind.[23] Pleasures of the body: These pleasures involve sensations of the body, such as the act of eating delicious food or of being in a state of comfort free from pain, and exist only in the present.[23] One can only experience pleasures of the body in the moment, meaning they only exist as a person is experiencing them.[24] Pleasures of the mind: These pleasures involve mental processes and states; feelings of joy, the lack of fear, and pleasant memories are all examples of pleasures of the mind.[23] These pleasures of the mind do not only exist in the present, but also in the past and future, since memory of a past pleasant experience or the expectation of some potentially pleasing future can both be pleasurable experiences.[24] Because of this, the pleasures of the mind are considered to be greater than those of the body.[24] The Epicureans further divided each of these types of pleasures into two categories: kinetic pleasure and katastematic pleasure.[25] Kinetic pleasure: Kinetic pleasure describes the physical or mental pleasures that involve action or change.[26] Eating delicious food, as well as fulfilling desires and removing pain, which is itself considered a pleasurable act, are all examples of kinetic pleasure in the physical sense.[25][27] According to Epicurus, feelings of joy would be an example of mental kinetic pleasure.[25] Katastematic pleasure: Katastematic pleasure describes the pleasure one feels while in a state without pain.[27] Like kinetic pleasures, katastematic pleasures can also be physical, such as the state of not being thirsty, or mental, such as freedom from a state of fear.[25][26] Complete physical katastematic pleasure is called aponia, and complete mental katastematic pleasure is called ataraxia.[25] From this understanding, Epicureans concluded that the greatest pleasure a person could reach was the complete removal of all pain, both physical and mental.[28] The ultimate goal then of Epicurean ethics was to reach a state of aponia and ataraxia.[28] In order to do this an Epicurean had to control their desires, because desire itself was seen as painful.[29] Not only will controlling one's desires bring about aponia, as one will rarely suffer from not being physically satisfied, but controlling one's desires will also help to bring about ataraxia because one will not be anxious about becoming discomforted since one would have so few desires anyway.[30] Epicurus distinguishes three kinds of desires: the natural and necessary, the natural but not necessary, and those that are neither natural nor necessary.[29] Natural and necessary: These desires are limited desires that are innately present in all humans; it is part of human nature to have them.[29] They are necessary for one of three reasons: necessary for happiness, necessary for freedom from bodily discomfort, and necessary for life.[29] Clothing would belong to the first two categories, while something like food would belong to the third.[29] Natural but not necessary: These desires are innate to humans, but they do not need to be fulfilled for their happiness or their survival.[30] Wanting to eat delicious food when one is hungry is an example of a natural but not necessary desire.[30] The main problem with these desires is that they fail to substantially increase a person's happiness, and at the same time require effort to obtain and are desired by people due to false beliefs that they are actually necessary.[30] It is for this reason that they should be avoided.[30] Not natural nor necessary: These desires are neither innate to humans nor required for happiness or health; indeed, they are also limitless and can never be fulfilled.[31] Desires of wealth or fame would fall under this category, and such desires are to be avoided because they will ultimately only bring about discomfort.[31] If one follows only natural and necessary desires, then, according to Epicurus, one would be able to reach aponia and ataraxia and thereby the highest form of happiness.[31] Epicurus was also an early thinker to develop the notion of justice as a social contract. He defined justice as an agreement made by people not to harm each other.[14] The point of living in a society with laws and punishments is to be protected from harm so that one is free to pursue happiness.[32] Because of this, laws that do not contribute to promoting human happiness are not just.[32] He gave his own unique version of the ethic of reciprocity, which differs from other formulations by emphasizing minimizing harm and maximizing happiness for oneself and others: "It is impossible to live a pleasant life without living wisely and well and justly, and it is impossible to live wisely and well and justly without living a pleasant life."[33] ("justly" meaning to prevent a "person from harming or being harmed by another")[33] Epicureanism incorporated a relatively full account of the social contract theory, and in part attempts to address issues with the society described in Plato's Republic.[32] The social contract theory established by Epicureanism is based on mutual agreement, not divine decree.[32] Politics[edit] Epicurean ideas on politics disagree with other philosophical traditions, namely the Stoic, Platonist and Aristotelian traditions.[34] To Epicureans all our social relations are a matter of how we perceive each other, of customs and traditions. No one is inherently of higher value or meant to dominate another.[35] That is because there is no metaphysical basis for the superiority of one kind of person, all people are made of the same atomic material and are thus naturally equal.[35] Epicureans also discourage political participation and other involvement in politics.[35] However Epicureans are not apolitical, it is possible that some political association could be seen as beneficial by some Epicureans.[34] Some political associations could lead to certain benefits to the individual that would help to maximize pleasure and avoid physical or mental distress.[34] The avoidance or freedom from hardship and fear is ideal to the Epicureans.[34] While this avoidance or freedom could conceivably be achieved through political means it was insisted by Epicurus that involvement in politics would not release one from fear and he advised against a life of politics.[34] Epicurus also discouraged contributing to political society by starting a family, as the benefits of a wife and children are outweighed by the trouble brought about by having a family.[34] Instead Epicurus encouraged a formation of a community of friends outside the traditional political state. This community of virtuous friends would focus on internal affairs and justice.[34] However, Epicureanism is adaptable to circumstance as is the Epicurean approach to politics.[34] The same approaches will not always work in protection from pain and fear. In some situations it will be more beneficial to have a family and in other situations it will be more beneficial to participate in politics. It is ultimately up to the Epicurean to analyse their circumstance and take whatever action befits the situation.[34] Religion[edit] Epicureanism does not deny the existence of the gods; rather it denies their involvement in the world. According to Epicureanism, the gods do not interfere with human lives or the rest of the universe in any way[36]-thus, it shuns the idea that frightening weather events are divine retribution.[37] One of the fears the Epicurean ought to be freed from is fear relating to the actions of the gods.[38] The manner in which the Epicurean gods exist is still disputed. Some scholars say that Epicureanism believes that the gods exist outside the mind as material objects (the realist position), while others assert that the gods only exist in our minds as ideals (the idealist position).[36][39][40] The realist position holds that Epicureans understand the gods as existing as physical and immortal beings made of atoms that reside somewhere in reality.[36][40] However, the gods are completely separate from the rest of reality; they are uninterested in it, play no role in it, and remain completely undisturbed by it.[41] Instead, the gods live in what is called the metakosmia, or the space between worlds.[42] Contrarily, the idealist position holds that Epicurus did not actually conceive of the gods as existing in reality. Rather, Epicurus is said to have viewed the gods as just idealized forms of the best human life,[39][43] and it is thought that the gods were emblematic of the life one should aspire towards.[39] The debate between these two positions was revived by A. A. Long and David Sedley in their 1987 book, The Hellenistic Philosophers, in which the two argued in favour of the idealist position.[39][40] While a scholarly consensus has yet to be reached, the realist position remains the prevailing viewpoint at this time.[39][40] Epicureanism also offered arguments against the existence of the gods in the manner proposed by other belief systems. The Riddle of Epicurus, or Problem of evil, is a famous argument against the existence of an all-powerful and providential God or gods. As recorded by Lactantius: God either wants to eliminate bad things and cannot, or can but does not want to, or neither wishes to nor can, or both wants to and can. If he wants to and cannot, then he is weak – and this does not apply to god. If he can but does not want to, then he is spiteful – which is equally foreign to god's nature. If he neither wants to nor can, he is both weak and spiteful, and so not a god. If he wants to and can, which is the only thing fitting for a god, where then do bad things come from? Or why does he not eliminate them? — Lactantius, De Ira Deorum[44] This type of trilemma argument (God is omnipotent, God is good, but Evil exists) was one favoured by the ancient Greek skeptics, and this argument may have been wrongly attributed to Epicurus by Lactantius, who, from his Christian perspective, regarded Epicurus as an atheist.[45] According to Reinhold F. Glei, it is settled that the argument of theodicy is from an academical source which is not only not Epicurean, but even anti-Epicurean.[46] The earliest extant version of this trilemma appears in the writings of the Pyrrhonist philosopher Sextus Empiricus.[47] Parallels may be drawn to Jainism and Buddhism, which similarly emphasize a lack of divine interference and aspects of its atomism. Epicureanism also resembles Buddhism in its temperateness, including the belief that great excess leads to great dissatisfaction.[48][49][50] Some modern Epicureans have argued that Epicureanism is a type of religious identity, arguing that it fulfils Ninian Smart's "seven dimensions of religion", and that the Epicurean practices of feasting on the twentieth and declaring an oath to follow Epicurus, insistence on doctrinal adherence, and the sacredness of Epicurean friendship, make Epicureanism more similar to some non-theistic religions than to other philosophies.[51] Epicurean physics[edit] Epicurean physics held that the entire universe consisted of two things: matter and void.[52] Matter is made up of atoms, which are tiny bodies that have only the unchanging qualities of shape, size, and weight.[53][54] Atoms were felt to be unchanging because the Epicureans believed that the world was ordered and that changes had to have specific and consistent sources, e.g. a plant species only grows from a seed of the same species.[55][56] Epicurus holds that there must be an infinite supply of atoms, although only a finite number of types of atoms, as well as an infinite amount of void.[53] Epicurus explains this position in his letter to Herodotus: Moreover, the sum of things is unlimited both by reason of the multitude of the atoms and the extent of the void. For if the void were infinite and bodies finite, the bodies would not have stayed anywhere but would have been dispersed in their course through the infinite void, not having any supports or counterchecks to send them back on their upward rebound. Again, if the void were finite, the infinity of bodies would not have anywhere to be.[57] Because of the infinite supply of atoms, there are an infinite amount of worlds, or cosmoi.[53] Some of these worlds could be vastly different than our own, some quite similar, and all of the worlds were separated from each other by vast areas of void (metakosmia).[53] Epicureanism states that atoms are unable to be broken down into any smaller parts, and Epicureans offered multiple arguments to support this position.[58] Epicureans argue that because void is necessary for matter to move, anything which consists of both void and matter can be broken down, while if something contains no void then it has no way to break apart because no part of the substance could be broken down into a smaller subsection of the substance.[55] They also argued that in order for the universe to persist, what it is ultimately made up of must not be able to be changed or else the universe would be essentially destroyed.[58][55] Atoms are constantly moving in one of four different ways.[59] Atoms can simply collide with each other and then bounce off of each other.[59] When joined with each other and forming a larger object, atoms can vibrate as they collide into each other while still maintaining the overall shape of the larger object.[59] When not prevented by other atoms, all atoms move at the same speed naturally downwards in relation to the rest world.[59][60] This downwards motion is natural for atoms; however, as their fourth means of motion, atoms can at times randomly swerve out of their usual downwards path.[60] This swerving motion is what allowed for the creation of the universe, since as more and more atoms swerved and collided with each other, objects were able to take shape as the atoms joined together. Without the swerve, the atoms would never have interacted with each other, and simply continued to move downwards at the same speed.[59][60] Epicurus also felt that the swerve was what accounted for humanity's free will.[61] If it were not for the swerve, humans would be subject to a never-ending chain of cause and effect.[61] This was a point which Epicureans often used to criticize Democritus' atomic theory.[61] Epicureans believed that senses also relied on atoms. Every object was continually emitting particles from itself that would then interact with the observer.[62] All sensations, such as sight, smell, or sound, relied on these particles.[62] While the atoms that were emitted did not have the qualities that the senses were perceiving, the manner in which they were emitted caused the observer to experience those sensations, e.g. red particles were not themselves red but were emitted in a manner that caused the viewer to experience the color red.[62] The atoms are not perceived individually, but rather as a continuous sensation because of how quickly they move.[62] Epistemology[edit] Epicurean philosophy employs an empirical epistemology.[63] The Epicureans believed that all sense perceptions were true,[64][65] and that errors arise in how we judge those perceptions.[65] When we form judgments about things (hupolepsis), they can be verified and corrected through further sensory information.[65][66][67][68] For example, if someone sees a tower from far away that appears to be round, and upon approaching the tower they see that it is actually square, they would come to realize that their original judgement was wrong and correct their wrong opinion.[68] Epicurus is said to have proposed three criteria of truth: sensations (aisthêsis), preconceptions (prolepsis), and feelings (pathê).[69] A fourth criterion called "presentational applications of the mind" (phantastikai epibolai tês dianoias) was said to have been added by later Epicureans.[69][70] These criteria formed the method through which Epicureans thought we gained knowledge.[63] Since Epicureans thought that sensations could not deceive, sensations are the first and main criterion of truth for Epicureans.[65] Even in cases where sensory input seems to mislead, the input itself is true and the error arises from our judgments about the input. For example, when one places a straight oar in the water, it appears bent. The Epicurean would argue that image of the oar, that is the atoms travelling from the oar to the observer's eyes, have been shifted and thus really do arrive at the observer's eyes in the shape of a bent oar.[71] The observer makes the error in assuming that the image he or she receives correctly represents the oar and has not been distorted in some way.[71] In order to not make erroneous judgments about perceivable things and instead verify one's judgment, Epicureans believed that one needed to obtain "clear vision" (enargeia) of the perceivable thing by closer examination.[72] This acted as a justification for one's judgements about the thing being perceived.[72] Enargeia is characterized as sensation of an object that has been unchanged by judgments or opinions and is a clear and direct perception of that object.[73] An individual's preconceptions are his or her concepts of what things are, e.g. what someone's idea of a horse is, and these concepts are formed in a person's mind through sensory input over time.[74] When the word that relates to the preconception is used, these preconceptions are summoned up by the mind into the person's thoughts.[75] It is through our preconceptions that we are able to make judgments about the things that we perceive.[68] Preconceptions were also used by Epicureans to avoid the paradox proposed by Plato in the Meno regarding learning.[75] Plato argues that learning requires us to already have knowledge of what we are learning, or else we would be unable to recognize when we had successfully learned the information.[75] Preconceptions, Epicureans argue, provide individuals with that pre-knowledge required for learning.[75] Our feelings or emotions (pathê) are how we perceive pleasure and pain.[70] They are analogous to sensations in that they are a means of perception, but they perceive our internal state as opposed to external things.[70] According to Diogenes Laertius, feelings are how we determine our actions. If something is pleasurable, we pursue that thing, and if something is painful, we avoid that thing.[70] The idea of "presentational applications of the mind" is an explanation for how we can discuss and inquire about things we cannot directly perceive.[76] We receive impressions of such things directly in our minds, instead of perceiving them through other senses.[69] The concept of "presentational applications of the mind" may have been introduced to explain how we learn about things that we cannot directly perceive, such as the gods.[69][76] Tetrapharmakos[edit] Main article: Tetrapharmakos Part of Herculaneum Papyrus 1005 (P.Herc.1005), col. 5. Contains Epicurean tetrapharmakos from Philodemus' Adversus Sophistas. Tetrapharmakos, or "The four-part cure", is Philodemus of Gadara's basic guideline as to how to live the happiest possible life, based on the first four of Epicurus' Principal Doctrines. This poetic doctrine was handed down by an anonymous Epicurean who summed up Epicurus' philosophy on happiness in four simple lines: Don't fear god, Don't worry about death; What is good is easy to get, and What is terrible is easy to endure. — Philodemus, Herculaneum Papyrus, 1005, 4.9–14 Notable Epicureans[edit] De rerum natura manuscript, copied by an Augustinian friar for Pope Sixtus IV, c. 1483, after the discovery of an early manuscript in 1417 by the humanist and papal secretary Poggio Bracciolini One of the earliest Roman writers espousing Epicureanism was Amafinius. Other adherents to the teachings of Epicurus included the poet Horace, whose famous statement Carpe Diem ("Seize the Day") illustrates the philosophy, as well as Lucretius, who wrote the poem De rerum natura about the tenets of the philosophy. The poet Virgil was another prominent Epicurean (see Lucretius for further details). The Epicurean philosopher Philodemus of Gadara, until the 18th century only known as a poet of minor importance, rose to prominence as most of his work along with other Epicurean material was discovered in the Villa of the Papyri. In the second century CE, comedian Lucian of Samosata and wealthy promoter of philosophy Diogenes of Oenoanda were prominent Epicureans. Julius Caesar leaned considerably toward Epicureanism, which led to his plea against the death sentence during the trial against Catiline, during the Catiline conspiracy where he spoke out against the Stoic Cato.[77] His father-in-law, Lucius Calpurnius Piso Caesoninus was also an adept of the school. In modern times Thomas Jefferson referred to himself as an Epicurean: If I had time I would add to my little book the Greek, Latin and French texts, in columns side by side. And I wish I could subjoin a translation of Gassendi's Syntagma of the doctrines of Epicurus, which, notwithstanding the calumnies of the Stoics and caricatures of Cicero, is the most rational system remaining of the philosophy of the ancients, as frugal of vicious indulgence, and fruitful of virtue as the hyperbolical extravagances of his rival sects.[78] Other modern-day Epicureans were Gassendi, Walter Charleton, François Bernier, Saint-Evremond, Ninon de l'Enclos, Denis Diderot, Frances Wright and Jeremy Bentham. Christopher Hitchens referred to himself as an Epicurean.[79] In France, where perfumer/restaurateur Gérald Ghislain refers to himself as an Epicurean,[80] Michel Onfray is developing a post-modern approach to Epicureanism.[81] In his recent book titled The Swerve, Stephen Greenblatt identified himself as strongly sympathetic to Epicureanism and Lucretius. Humanistic Judaism as a denomination also claims the Epicurean label. Modern usage and misconceptions[edit] In modern popular usage, an Epicurean is a connoisseur of the arts of life and the refinements of sensual pleasures; Epicureanism implies a love or knowledgeable enjoyment especially of good food and drink. Because Epicureanism posits that pleasure is the ultimate good (telos), it has been commonly misunderstood since ancient times as a doctrine that advocates the partaking in fleeting pleasures such as sexual excess and decadent food. This is not the case. Epicurus regarded ataraxia (tranquility, freedom from fear) and aponia (absence of pain) as the height of happiness. He also considered prudence an important virtue and perceived excess and overindulgence to be contrary to the attainment of ataraxia and aponia.[17] Epicurus preferred "the good", and "even wisdom and culture", to the "pleasure of the stomach".[82] While twentieth-century commentary has generally sought to diminish this and related quotations, the consistency of the lower-case epicureanism of meals with Epicurean materialism overall has more recently been explained.[83] While Epicurus sought moderation at meals, he was also not averse to moderation in moderation, that is, to occasional luxury. Called "The Garden" for being based in what would have been a kitchen garden, his community also became known for its feasts of the twentieth (of the Greek month). Criticism[edit] Francis Bacon wrote an apothegm related to Epicureanism: There was an Epicurean vaunted, that divers of other sects of philosophers did after turn Epicureans, but there was never any Epicurean that turned to any other sect. Whereupon a philosopher that was of another sect, said; The reason was plain, for that cocks may be made capons, but capons could never be made cocks.[84] This echoed what the Academic Skeptic philosopher Arcesilaus had said when asked "why it was that pupils from all the other schools went over to Epicurus, but converts were never made from the Epicureans?" to which he responded: "Because men may become eunuchs, but a eunuch never becomes a man."[85] See also[edit] Philosophy portal Charvaka, a hedonic Indian school Cyrenaics, a sensual hedonist Greek school of philosophy founded in the 4th century BCE Dehellenization Epicurea Epicurean paradox Epikoros Hedonic treadmill List of English translations of De rerum natura Philosophy of happiness Separation of church and state Zeno of Sidon References[edit] ^ 1951-, Wilson, Catherine (2015). Epicureanism : a very short introduction (First ed.). Oxford, United Kingdom. ISBN 9780199688326. OCLC 917374685.CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) ^ a b David Konstan. "Epicurus". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. ^ The Hidden History of Greco-Roman Vegetarianism ^ Dombrowski, Daniel (1984). The Philosophy of Vegetarianism. University of Massachusetts Press. p. 81. ISBN 978-0-87023-431-6. ^ MacGillivray, Erlend D (2012). "The Popularity of Epicureanism in Late-Republic Roman Society". The Ancient World. XLIII: 151–172. ^ Michael Frede (1999). "Epilogue". The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. pp. 795–96. ^ Trans. Robert Pinsky, The Inferno of Dante, p. 320 n. 11. ^ a b c O'Keefe, Tim (2010). Epicureanism. University of California Press. pp. 107–115. ^ O'Keefe, Tim (2010). Epicureanism. University of California Press. pp. 125–127. ^ Wilson, Catherine (2015). Epicureanism: A Very Brief Introduction. United States of America: Oxford University. pp. 84–85. ^ O'Keefe, Tim (2010). Epicureanism. University of California Press. p. 145. ^ O'Keefe, Tim (2010). Epicureanism. University of California Press. pp. 155–171. ^ Wilson, Catherine (2015). Epicureanism: A Very Short Introduction. United States of America: Oxford University Press. pp. 95–96. ^ a b O'Keefe, Tim (2010). Epicureanism. University of California Press. pp. 139–140. ^ a b O'Keefe, Tim (2010). Epicureanism. University of California Press. pp. 142–145. ^ On Goals, 1.65 ^ a b Epicurus, "Letter to Menoeceus", contained in Diogenes Laertius, Lives of Eminent Philosophers, Book X ^ Wilson, Catherine (2015). Epicureanism: A Very Brief Introduction. United States of America: Oxford University Press. p. 52. ^ Russell, Bertrand. A History of Western Philosophy, pp. 239–40 ^ Epicurus (c 341–270 BCE) British Humanist Association ^ Sharples, R. W. (1996). Stoics, Epicureans, and Sceptics: An Introduction to Hellenistic Philosophy. New York, NY: Routledge. p. 84. ^ Wilson, Catherine (2015). Epicureanism: A Very Short Introduction. United States of America: Oxford University Press. p. 93. ^ a b c d O'Keefe, Tim (2010). Epicureanism. University of California Press. pp. 117–121. ^ a b c O'Keefe, Tim (2010). Epicureanism. University of California Press. pp. 118–119. ^ a b c d e O'Keefe, Tim (2010). Epicureanism. University of California Press. pp. 119–120. ^ a b Sharples, R. W. (1996). Stoics, Epicureans, and Sceptics: An Introduction to Hellenistic Philosophy. New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 91–92. ^ a b Warren, James (2002). Epicurus and Democritean Ethics: An Archaeology of Ataraxia. New York, NY: University of Cambridge. p. 4. ^ a b O'Keefe, Tim (2010). Epicureanism. University of California Press. p. 120. ^ a b c d e O'Keefe, Tim (2010). Epicureanism. University of California Press. pp. 124–125. ^ a b c d e O'Keefe, Tim (2010). Epicureanism. University of California Press. pp. 126–127. ^ a b c O'Keefe, Tim (2010). Epicureanism. University of California Press. pp. 125–126. ^ a b c d O'Keefe, Tim (2010). Epicureanism. University of California Press. pp. 139–142. ^ a b "Epicurus Principal Doctrines 5 and 31 transl. by Robert Drew Hicks". 1925. ^ a b c d e f g h i The Cambridge companion to epicureanism. Warren, James, 1974-. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 2009. ISBN 9780521873475. OCLC 297147109.CS1 maint: others (link) ^ a b c 1951-, Wilson, Catherine (2015). Epicureanism : a very short introduction (First ed.). Oxford, United Kingdom. ISBN 9780199688326. OCLC 917374685.CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) ^ a b c O'Keefe, Tim (2010). Epicureanism. University of California Press. pp. 155–156. ^ The Cambridge companion to Epicureanism, edited by James Warren, page 124 ^ The Cambridge companion to Epicureanism, edited by James Warren, age 105 ^ a b c d e Sedley, David (2011). "Epicurus' theological innatism". In Fish, Jeffrey; Sanders, Kirk R. (eds.). Epicurus and the Epicurean Tradition. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. pp. 29–30. ^ a b c d Konstan, David (2011). "Epicurus on the gods". In Fish, Jeffrey; Sanders, Kirk R. (eds.). Epicurus and the Epicurean Tradition. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. pp. 53–54. ^ Mansfeld, Jaap (1993). "Aspects of Epicurean Theology". Mnemosyne. 46 (2): 176–178. doi:10.1163/156852593X00484. ^ Buchheit, Vinzenz (2007). "Epicurus' Triumph of the Mind". In Gale, Monica R. (ed.). Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: Lucretius. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. pp. 110–111. ^ O'Keefe, Tim (2010). Epicureanism. University of California Press. pp. 158–159. ^ Lactantius, De Ira Deorum, 13.19 (Epicurus, Frag. 374, Usener). David Hume paraphrased this passage in his Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion: "EPICURUS's old questions are yet unanswered. Is he willing to prevent evil, but not able? then is he impotent. Is he able, but not willing? then is he malevolent. Is he both able and willing? whence then is evil?" ^ Mark Joseph Larrimore, (2001), The Problem of Evil, pp. xix–xxi. Wiley-Blackwell ^ Glei, Reinhold F. (1988). "Et invidus et inbecillus. Das angebliche Epikurfragment bei Laktanz, De ira dei 13, 20–21". Vigiliae Christianae. 42: 47–58. doi:10.2307/1584470. ^ Sextus Empiricus, Outlines of Pyrrhonism, 175: "those who firmly maintain that god exists will be forced into impiety; for if they say that he [god] takes care of everything, they will be saying that god is the cause of evils, while if they say that he takes care of some things only or even nothing, they will be forced to say that he is either malevolent or weak" ^ Scharfstein, Ben-Ami (1998). A Comparative History of World Philosophy: From the Upanishads to Kant. SUNY Press. p. 202. ISBN 9780791436837. ^ Cooper, David E.; James, Simon P. (2017). Buddhism, Virtue and Environment. Routledge. p. 105. ISBN 9781351954310. ^ Berenice II and the Golden Age of Ptolemaic Egypt, Dee L. Clayman, Oxford University Press, 2014, p.33 ^ "Epicureanism as a Religious Identity". ^ O'Keefe, Tim (2010). Epicureanism. University of California Press. pp. 11–13. ^ a b c d Wilson, Catherine (2015). Epicureanism: A Very Short Introduction. United States of America: Oxford University Press. p. 9. ^ O'Keefe, Tim (2010). Epicureanism. University of California Press. p. 21. ^ a b c O'Keefe, Tim (2010). Epicureanism. University of California Press. pp. 18–20. ^ Sharples, R. W. (1998). Stoics, Epicureans, and Sceptics: An Introduction to Hellenistic Philosophy. New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 34–35. ^ Diogenes, Laertius (1925). Lives of Eminent Philosophers: Volume II: Books 6-10. Translated by Hicks, R. D. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. pp. 573–575. ^ a b Sharples, R. W. (1996). Stoics, Epicureans, and Sceptics: An introduction to Hellenistic Philosophy. New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 35–37. ^ a b c d e Wilson, Catherine (2015). Epicureanism: A Very Short Introduction. United States of America: Oxford University Press. p. 11. ^ a b c O'Keefe, Tim (2010). Epicureanism. University of California Press. pp. 25–28. ^ a b c Sharples, R. W. (1996). Stoics, Epicurus, and Sceptics: An Introduction to Hellenistic Philosophy. New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 64–66. ^ a b c d Wilson, Catherine (2015). Epicureanism: A Very Short Introduction. United States of America: Oxford University Press. pp. 54–55. ^ a b O'Keefe, Tim (2010). Epicureanism. University of California Press. p. 85. ^ Asmis, Elizabeth (2009). "Epicurean empiricism". In Warren, James (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism. Cambridge University Press. p. 84. ^ a b c d O'Keefe, Tim (2010). Epicureanism. University of California Pres. pp. 97–98. ^ Bakalis, Nikolaos (2005). Handbook of Greek Philosophy: From Thales to the Stoics Analysis and Fragments. Canada: Trafford Publishing. pp. 193–197. ^ Konstan, David (2011). Fish, Jeffrey; Sanders, Kirk R. (eds.). Epicurus and the Epicurean Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 62–63. ^ a b c O'Keefe, Tim (2010). Epicureanism. University of California Press. pp. 103–104. ^ a b c d Sharples, R. W. (1996). Stoics, Epicureans and Sceptics. New York, NY: Routledge. p. 19. ^ a b c d Asmis, Elizabeth (2009). "Epicurean empiricism". In Warren, James (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 93–94. ^ a b Sharples, R. W. (1996). Stoics, Epicureans, and Sceptics: An Introduction to Hellenistic Philosophy. New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 12–13. ^ a b Sharples, R. W. (1996). Stoics, Epicureans, and Sceptics: An Introduction to Hellenistic Philosophy. New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 12–16. ^ Asmis, Elizabeth (2009). "Epicurean empiricism". In Warren, James (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism. Cambridge University Press. p. 85. ^ Sharples, R. W. (1996). Stoics, Epicureans, and Sceptics: An Introduction to Hellenistic Philosophy. New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 18–19. ^ a b c d O'Keefe, Tim (2010). Epicureanism. University of California Press. pp. 101–103. ^ a b Tsouna, Voula (2016). "Epicurean Preconceptions". Phronesis. 61 (2): 215. doi:10.1163/15685284-12341304. ^ Cf. Sallust, The War With Catiline, Caesar's speech: 51.29 & Cato's reply: 52.13). ^ "Full text of "The writings of Thomas Jefferson;"". archive.org. Retrieved 6 May 2016. ^ "Townhall.com::Talk Radio Online::Radio Show". Archived from the original on 5 November 2018. Retrieved 5 September 2019. ^ Anon., Gérald Ghislain – Creator of The Scent of Departure. IdeaMensch, 14 July 2011. ^ Michel Onfray, La puissance d'exister: Manifeste hédoniste, Grasset, 2006 ^ Cyril Bailey, Epicurus: The Extant Remains, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1926, p.131 ^ Michael Symons, "Epicurus, the foodies’ philosopher", pp. 13-30, in Fritz Allhoff and Dave Monroe, eds, Food & Philosophy: Eat, think, and be merry, Malden (MA, USA): Blackwell Publishing, 2007 ^ Francis Bacon, Apothegms 280, The Works of Francis Bacon, Volume 1/Apophthegms ^ Diogenes Laertius, Lives of the Eminent Philosophers Book IV, Chapter 6, section 45 http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0258%3Abook%3D4%3Achapter%3D6 Further reading[edit] Dane R. Gordon and David B. Suits, Epicurus. His Continuing Influence and Contemporary Relevance, Rochester, N.Y.: RIT Cary Graphic Arts Press, 2003. Holmes, Brooke & Shearin, W. H. Dynamic Reading: Studies in the Reception of Epicureanism, New York: Oxford University Press, 2012. Jones, Howard. The Epicurean Tradition, New York: Routledge, 1989. Neven Leddy and Avi S. Lifschitz, Epicurus in the Enlightenment, Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 2009. Long, A.A. & Sedley, D.N. The Hellenistic Philosophers Volume 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987. ( ISBN 0-521-27556-3) Long, Roderick (2008). "Epicureanism". In Hamowy, Ronald (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Libertarianism. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; Cato Institute. p. 153. doi:10.4135/9781412965811.n95. ISBN 978-1-4129-6580-4. LCCN 2008009151. OCLC 750831024. Martin Ferguson Smith (ed.), Diogenes of Oinoanda. The Epicurean inscription, edited with introduction, translation, and notes, Naples: Bibliopolis, 1993. Martin Ferguson Smith, Supplement to Diogenes of Oinoanda. The Epicurean Inscription, Naples: Bibliopolis, 2003. Warren, James (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. Wilson, Catherine. Epicureanism at the Origins of Modernity, New York: Oxford University Press, 2008. Zeller, Eduard; Reichel, Oswald J., The Stoics, Epicureans and Sceptics, Longmans, Green, and Co., 1892 External links[edit] Library resources about Epicureanism Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries Wikimedia Commons has media related to Epicureanism. Society of Friends of Epicurus Epicureans on PhilPapers Epicurus.info – Epicurean Philosophy Online Epicurus.net – Epicurus and Epicurean Philosophy Karl Marx's Notebooks on Epicurean Philosophy Marx's Doctoral Dissertation On the Difference between the Democritean and Epicurean Philosophy of Nature v t e Epicureanism Philosophers Greek era Epicurus Polyaenus Metrodorus Batis Leontion Carneiscus Idomeneus Hermarchus Colotes Themista Leonteus Polystratus Dionysius of Lamptrai Basilides Philonides Diogenes of Tarsus Alcaeus and Philiscus Apollodorus Demetrius Lacon Zeno of Sidon Roman era Amafinius Rabirius Titus Albucius Phaedrus Philodemus Lucretius Patro Catius Siro Diogenes of Oenoanda Modern era Pierre Gassendi Denis Diderot Jeremy Bentham Jun Tsuji Christopher Hitchens Michel Onfray Philosophy Epicureanism (cf. Hedonism) Tetrapharmakos Concepts Aponia Ataraxia Clinamen Eudaimonia Hedone Metakosmia Works On the Nature of Things List of English translations of De rerum natura v t e Ancient Greek schools of philosophy Pre-Socratic Ionian Epimenides of Knossos Pherecydes of Syros Diogenes Metrodorus of Lampsacus Xenophanes Xeniades Theodorus of Cyrene Anacharsis Milesian Thales Anaximander Anaximenes Ephesian Heraclitus Cratylus Antisthenes Atomist Leucippus Democritus Italian Hippo Musaeus of Athens Themistoclea Pythagorean Pythagoras Hippasus Philolaus Archytas Alcmaeon Brontinus Theano Arignote Myia Damo Calliphon Hermotimus Metrodorus of Cos Eurytus Eleatic Parmenides Zeno Melissus Pluralist Anaxagoras Archelaus Empedocles Sophist Protagoras Gorgias Prodicus Hippias Antiphon Lycophron Damon Callicles Thrasymachus Euthydemus Dionysodorus Euenus Critias Socratic Socrates Xenophon Cebes of Thebes Simmias of Thebes Cynic Antisthenes Diogenes Diodorus Zoilus Onesicritus Philiscus Crates Hipparchia Metrocles Monimus Cleomenes Bion Sotades Menippus Menedemus Cercidas Teles Meleager Favonius Demetrius Dio Chrysostom Agathobulus Secundus Demonax Peregrinus Proteus Theagenes Oenomaus Pancrates Crescens Heraclius Horus Asclepiades Sallustius Cyrenaic Aristippus Arete of Cyrene Aristippus the Younger Theodorus the Atheist Antipater of Cyrene Aristotle of Cyrene Hegesias of Cyrene Anniceris Dionysius the Renegade Euhemerus Eretrian Phaedo of Elis Menedemus Asclepiades of Phlius Megarian Euclid of Megara Ichthyas Thrasymachus Eubulides Stilpo Nicarete Pasicles Bryson Dialectical Clinomachus Apollonius Cronus Euphantus Dionysius Diodorus Cronus Philo Alexinus Panthoides Peripatetic Aristotle Aristoxenus Clearchus of Soli Dicaearchus Eudemus of Rhodes Theophrastus Strato of Lampsacus Lyco of Troas Aristo of Ceos Critolaus Diodorus of Tyre Erymneus Andronicus of Rhodes Cratippus Andronicus of Rhodes Boethus of Sidon Aristocles of Messene Aspasius Adrastus Alexander of Aphrodisias Themistius Olympiodorus the Elder Platonic Plato Eudoxus Philip of Opus Aristonymus Coriscus Erastus of Scepsis Demetrius of Amphipolis Euaeon of Lampsacus Heraclides Python of Aenus Hestiaeus of Perinthus Lastheneia of Mantinea Timolaus of Cyzicus Speusippus Axiothea of Phlius Heraclides Ponticus Menedemus of Pyrrha Xenocrates Crantor Polemon Crates of Athens Hellenistic Academic Skeptic Middle Arcesilaus Diocles of Cnidus Lacydes Telecles Evander Hegesinus New Carneades Hagnon of Tarsus Metrodorus of Stratonicea Clitomachus Charmadas Aeschines of Neapolis Philo of Larissa Cicero Dio of Alexandria Epicurean Epicurus Polyaenus Metrodorus Batis Leontion Carneiscus Idomeneus Hermarchus Colotes Themista Leonteus Polystratus Dionysius of Lamptrai Basilides Philonides Diogenes of Tarsus Alcaeus and Philiscus Apollodorus Demetrius Lacon Zeno of Sidon Amafinius Rabirius Titus Albucius Phaedrus Philodemus Lucretius Patro Catius Siro Diogenes of Oenoanda Middle Platonic Antiochus Philo of Alexandria Plutarch Justin Martyr Gaius Albinus Alcinous Apuleius Atticus Maximus of Tyre Numenius of Apamea Longinus Clement of Alexandria Origen the Pagan Calcidius Neoplatonist Ammonius Saccas Plotinus Disciples Origen Amelius Porphyry Iamblichus Sopater Eustathius of Cappadocia Sosipatra Aedesius Dexippus Chrysanthius Theodorus of Asine Julian Sallustius Maximus of Ephesus Eusebius of Myndus Priscus of Epirus Antoninus Gregory of Nyssa Hypatia Augustine Macrobius Plutarch of Athens Hierius Asclepigenia Hierocles Syrianus Hermias Aedesia Proclus Ammonius Hermiae Asclepiodotus Hegias Zenodotus Marinus Agapius Isidore Damascius Simplicius Priscian Neopythagorean Nigidius Figulus Apollonius of Tyana Moderatus of Gades Nicomachus Alexicrates Anaxilaus Bolus of Mendes Cronius Damis Numenius of Apamea Secundus the Silent Quintus Sextius Sotion Theon of Smyrna Pyrrhonist Pyrrho Aenesidemus Agrippa the Skeptic Arcesilaus Hecataeus of Abdera Heraclides of Tarentum Herodotus of Tarsus Menodotus of Nicomedia Nausiphanes Sextus Empiricus Theodas of Laodicea Timon of Phlius Stoic Greek Zeno of Citium Persaeus Aratus of Soli Athenodorus of Soli Aristo of Chios Apollophanes of Antioch Dionysius the Renegade Sphaerus Herillus of Carthage Cleanthes Eratosthenes Hermagoras of Amphipolis Chrysippus Dioscorides Aristocreon Zeno of Tarsus Eudromus Crates of Mallus Diogenes of Babylon Zenodotus Apollodorus of Seleucia Basilides Antipater of Tarsus Apollodorus of Athens Archedemus of Tarsus Panaetius of Rhodes Boethus of Sidon Polemon of Athens Marcus Vigellius Heraclides of Tarsus Dardanus Mnesarchus Publius Rutilius Rufus Stilo Dionysius of Cyrene Quintus Lucilius Balbus Hecato of Rhodes Diotimus the Stoic Posidonius Crinis Proclus of Mallus Diodotus the Stoic Geminus of Rhodes Athenodoros Cordylion Apollonius of Tyre Cato the Younger Antipater of Tyre Porcia Catonis Apollonides Jason of Nysa Athenodoros Cananites Quintus Sextius Arius Didymus Roman Attalus Papirius Fabianus Seneca Thrasea Paetus Lucius Annaeus Cornutus Chaeremon of Alexandria Paconius Agrippinus Publius Egnatius Celer Persius Helvidius Priscus Arulenus Rusticus Musonius Rufus Fannia Euphrates the Stoic Cleomedes Epictetus Hierocles Flavius Arrianus Basilides Apollonius of Chalcedon Claudius Maximus Junius Rusticus Marcus Aurelius v t e Philosophy Branches Traditional Metaphysics Epistemology Logic Ethics Aesthetics Philosophy of... Action Color Culture Design Music Film Cosmology Education Environment Geography Happiness History Human nature Humor Feminism Language Law Life Literature Mathematics Medicine Healthcare Psychiatry Mind Pain Psychology Perception Philosophy Religion Science Physics Chemistry Biology Sexuality Social science Business Culture Economics Politics Society Space and time Sport Technology Artificial intelligence Computer science Engineering Information War Schools of thought By era Ancient Western Medieval Renaissance Early modern Modern Contemporary Ancient Chinese Agriculturalism Confucianism Legalism Logicians Mohism Chinese naturalism Neotaoism Taoism Yangism Chan Greco-Roman Aristotelianism Atomism Cynicism Cyrenaics Eleatics Eretrian school Epicureanism Hermeneutics Ionian Ephesian Milesian Megarian school Neoplatonism Peripatetic Platonism Pluralism Presocratic Pyrrhonism Pythagoreanism Neopythagoreanism Sophistic Stoicism Indian Hindu Samkhya Nyaya Vaisheshika Yoga Mīmāṃsā Ājīvika Ajñana Cārvāka Jain Anekantavada Syādvāda Buddhist Śūnyatā Madhyamaka Yogacara Sautrāntika Svatantrika Persian Mazdakism Mithraism Zoroastrianism Zurvanism Medieval European Christian Augustinianism Scholasticism Thomism Scotism Occamism Renaissance humanism East Asian Korean Confucianism Edo neo-Confucianism Neo-Confucianism Indian Vedanta Acintya bheda abheda Advaita Bhedabheda Dvaita Nimbarka Sampradaya Shuddhadvaita Vishishtadvaita Navya-Nyāya Islamic Averroism Avicennism Illuminationism ʿIlm al-Kalām Sufi Jewish Judeo-Islamic Modern People Cartesianism Kantianism Neo-Kantianism Hegelianism Marxism Spinozism 0 Anarchism Classical Realism Liberalism Collectivism Conservatism Determinism Dualism Empiricism Existentialism Foundationalism Historicism Holism Humanism Anti- Idealism Absolute British German Objective Subjective Transcendental Individualism Kokugaku Materialism Modernism Monism Naturalism Natural law Nihilism New Confucianism Neo-scholasticism Pragmatism Phenomenology Positivism Reductionism Rationalism Social contract Socialism Transcendentalism Utilitarianism Contemporary Analytic Applied ethics Analytic feminism Analytical Marxism Communitarianism Consequentialism Critical rationalism Experimental philosophy Falsificationism Foundationalism / Coherentism Internalism and externalism Logical positivism Legal positivism Normative ethics Meta-ethics Moral realism Quinean naturalism Ordinary language philosophy Postanalytic philosophy Quietism Rawlsian Reformed epistemology Systemics Scientism Scientific realism Scientific skepticism Transactionalism Contemporary utilitarianism Vienna Circle Wittgensteinian Continental Critical theory Deconstruction Existentialism Feminist Frankfurt School New Historicism Hermeneutics Neo-Marxism Phenomenology Posthumanism Postmodernism Post-structuralism Social constructionism Structuralism Western Marxism Other Kyoto School Objectivism Postcritique Russian cosmism more... Positions Aesthetics Formalism Institutionalism Aesthetic response Ethics Consequentialism Deontology Virtue Free will Compatibilism Determinism Hard Incompatibilism Hard Libertarianism Metaphysics Atomism Dualism Idealism Monism Naturalism Realism Epistemology Empiricism Fideism Naturalism Particularism Rationalism Skepticism Solipsism Mind Behaviorism Emergentism Eliminativism Epiphenomenalism Functionalism Objectivism Subjectivism Normativity Absolutism Particularism Relativism Nihilism Skepticism Universalism Ontology Action Event Process Reality Anti-realism Conceptualism Idealism Materialism Naturalism Nominalism Physicalism Realism By region Related lists Miscellaneous By region African Ethiopian Amerindian Aztec Eastern Chinese Egyptian Indian Indonesian Iranian Japanese Korean Pakistani Vietnamese Middle Eastern Western American Australian British Czech Danish French German Greek Italian Polish Romanian Russian Slovene Spanish Turkish Lists Outline Index Years Problems Schools Glossary Philosophers Movements Publications Miscellaneous Natural law Sage Theoretical philosophy / Practical philosophy Women in philosophy Portal Category Book v t e Philosophy of science Concepts Analysis Analytic–synthetic distinction A priori and a posteriori Causality Commensurability Consilience Construct Creative synthesis Demarcation problem Empirical evidence Explanatory power Fact Falsifiability Feminist method Functional contextualism Ignoramus et ignorabimus Inductive reasoning Intertheoretic reduction Inquiry Nature Objectivity Observation Paradigm Problem of induction Scientific law Scientific method Scientific revolution Scientific theory Testability Theory choice Theory-ladenness Underdetermination Unity of science Metatheory of science Coherentism Confirmation holism Constructive empiricism Constructive realism Constructivist epistemology Contextualism Conventionalism Deductive-nomological model Hypothetico-deductive model Inductionism Epistemological anarchism Evolutionism Fallibilism Foundationalism Instrumentalism Pragmatism Model-dependent realism Naturalism Physicalism Positivism / Reductionism / Determinism Rationalism / Empiricism Received view / Semantic view of theories Scientific realism / Anti-realism Scientific essentialism Scientific formalism Scientific skepticism Scientism Structuralism Uniformitarianism Vitalism Philosophy of Physics thermal and statistical Motion Chemistry Biology Geography Social science Technology Engineering Artificial intelligence Computer science Information Mind Psychiatry Psychology Perception Space and time Related topics Alchemy Criticism of science Descriptive science Epistemology Faith and rationality Hard and soft science History and philosophy of science History of science History of evolutionary thought Logic Metaphysics Normative science Pseudoscience Relationship between religion and science Rhetoric of science Science studies Sociology of scientific knowledge Sociology of scientific ignorance Philosophers of science by era Ancient Plato Aristotle Stoicism Epicureans Medieval Averroes Avicenna Roger Bacon William of Ockham Hugh of Saint Victor Dominicus Gundissalinus Robert Kilwardby Early modern Francis Bacon Thomas Hobbes René Descartes Galileo Galilei Pierre Gassendi Isaac Newton David Hume Late modern Immanuel Kant Friedrich Schelling William Whewell Auguste Comte John Stuart Mill Herbert Spencer Wilhelm Wundt Charles Sanders Peirce Wilhelm Windelband Henri Poincaré Pierre Duhem Rudolf Steiner Karl Pearson Contemporary Alfred North Whitehead Bertrand Russell Albert Einstein Otto Neurath C. D. Broad Michael Polanyi Hans Reichenbach Rudolf Carnap Karl Popper Carl Gustav Hempel W. V. O. Quine Thomas Kuhn Imre Lakatos Paul Feyerabend Jürgen Habermas Ian Hacking Bas van Fraassen Larry Laudan Daniel Dennett Category  Philosophy portal  Science portal Authority control GND: 4015033-1 LCCN: sh96001809 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Epicureanism&oldid=992885462" Categories: Epicureanism Hedonism Philosophical movements Philosophy of life Hidden categories: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list CS1 maint: others Use dmy dates from July 2020 Use Oxford spelling from July 2020 All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from October 2017 Commons category link from Wikidata Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Alemannisch العربية Azərbaycanca Беларуская Български Brezhoneg Català Čeština Deutsch Eesti Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français Galego 한국어 Հայերեն हिन्दी Hrvatski Ido Bahasa Indonesia Íslenska Italiano עברית ქართული Қазақша Кыргызча Lietuvių Magyar Македонски Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Occitan Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча پښتو ភាសាខ្មែរ Polski Português Română Русский Shqip Simple English سنڌي Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Tagalog Türkçe Українська 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 7 December 2020, at 16:54 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2754 ---- Wikipedia:Contact us - Wikipedia Wikipedia:Contact us From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Introduction Readers How to report a problem with an article, or find out more information. Article subjects Problems with articles about you, your company, or somebody you represent. Licensing How to copy Wikipedia's information, donate your own, or report unlicensed use of your information. Donors Find out about the process, how to donate, and information about how your money is spent. Press and partnerships If you're a member of the press looking to contact Wikipedia, or have a business proposal for us. Back to main page Thank you for your interest in contacting Wikipedia. Before proceeding, some important disclaimers: Wikipedia has no central editorial board. Contributions are made by a large number of volunteers at their own discretion. Edits are neither the responsibility of the Wikimedia Foundation (the organisation that hosts the site) nor of its staff and edits will not generally be made in response to an email request. Although Wikipedia was founded by Jimmy Wales, he is not personally responsible for our content. If you have questions about the concept of Wikipedia rather than a specific problem, the About Wikipedia page may help. If you want to ask other users for help with editing or using Wikipedia, stop by the Teahouse, Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. If you disagree with an article's content, or are involved in a content dispute, see Dispute resolution. The links on the left should direct you to how to contact us or resolve problems. If you cannot find your issue listed there, you can email helpful, experienced volunteers at info-enwikimedia.org. Please refrain from emailing about disagreements with content; they will not be resolved via email. Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Contact_us&oldid=967537943" Categories: Wikipedia tutorials Wikipedia quick introductions Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Project page Talk Variants Views Read View source View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Meta-Wiki Wikibooks Wikinews Wikiquote Wikiversity Wikivoyage Wiktionary Languages Alemannisch العربية تۆرکجه বাংলা Banjar Basa Banyumasan भोजपुरी Български Català Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Davvisámegiella Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto فارسی Français 한국어 हिन्दी Hrvatski Bahasa Indonesia Italiano עברית Jawa Latviešu Lëtzebuergesch Magyar Malti Bahasa Melayu မြန်မာဘာသာ Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Norsk nynorsk Occitan ଓଡ଼ିଆ Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча پښتو Plattdüütsch Polski Português Română Русиньскый Русский Scots Shqip Simple English سنڌي Slovenčina Slovenščina کوردی Српски / srpski Suomi Svenska Tagalog Татарча/tatarça ไทย Тоҷикӣ Türkçe Українська اردو Vèneto Tiếng Việt ייִדיש 粵語 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 13 July 2020, at 20:45 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2756 ---- Works attributed to Florus - Wikipedia Works attributed to Florus From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia   (Redirected from Florus) Jump to navigation Jump to search 2nd century Roman historian See also: Florus (Roman name) Three main sets of works are attributed to Florus (a Roman cognomen): Virgilius orator an poeta, an Epitome of Roman History and a collection of poems (26 tetrameters, and five hexameters about roses). As to whether these were composed by the same person, or set of people, is unclear, but the works are variously attributed to: Publius Annius Florus, described as a Roman poet and rhetorician Julius Florus, described as an ancient Roman poet, orator, and author who was born around 74 AD and died around 130 AD[1] Florus was born in Africa,[1] but raised in Rome. Lucius Annaeus Florus (circa 74 – 130 AD[2]), a Roman historian, who lived in the time of Trajan and Hadrian and was also born in Africa Contents 1 Virgilius orator an poeta 2 Poems 3 Epitome of Roman History 4 Attribution of the works 5 Tentative biography 6 References 7 Bibliography 8 External links Virgilius orator an poeta[edit] Hadrian The introduction to a dialogue called Virgilius orator an poeta is extant, in which the author (whose name is given as Publius Annius Florus) states that he was born in Africa, and at an early age took part in the literary contests on the Capitol instituted by Domitian. Having been refused a prize owing to the prejudice against African provincials, he left Rome in disgust, and after travelling for some time, set up at Tarraco as a teacher of rhetoric. Here he was persuaded by an acquaintance to return to Rome, for it is generally agreed that he is the Florus who wrote the well-known lines quoted together with Hadrian's answer by Aelius Spartianus (Hadrian I 6). Twenty-six trochaic tetrameters, De qualitate vitae, and five graceful hexameters, De rosis, are also attributed to him. Poems[edit] Florus was also an established poet.[3] He was once thought to have been "the first in order of a number of second-century African writers who exercised a considerable influence on Latin literature, and also the first of the poetae neoterici or novelli (new-fashioned poets) of Hadrian's reign, whose special characteristic was the use of lighter and graceful meters (anapaestic and iambic dimeters), which had hitherto found little favour." Since Cameron's article on the topic, however, the existence of such a school has been widely called into question, in part because the remnants of all poets supposedly involved are too scantily attested for any definitive judgment.[4] The little poems will be found in E. Bahrens, Poëtae Latini minores (1879–1883); for an unlikely identification of Florus with the author of the Pervigilium Veneris see E. H. O. Müller, De P. Anino Floro poéta et de Pervigilio Veneris (1855), and, for the poet's relations with Hadrian, Franz Eyssenhardt, Hadrian und Florus (1882); see also Friedrich Marx in Pauly-Wissowa's Realencyclopädie, i. pt. 2 (1894). Some his better-known poems include “Quality of Life”, “Roses in Springtime”, “Roses”, “The Rose”, “Venus’ Rose-Garden”, and “The Nine Muses”.[3][failed verification] Florus’ better-known poetry is also associated with his smaller poems that he would write to Hadrian out of admiration for the emperor.[5] Epitome of Roman History[edit] The two books of the Epitome of Roman History were written in admiration of the Roman people.[1] The books illuminate many historical events in a favorable tone for the Roman citizens.[6] The book is mainly based on Livy's enormous Ab Urbe Condita Libri. It consists of a brief sketch of the history of Rome from the foundation of the city to the closing of the Temple of Janus by Augustus in 25 BC. The work, which is called Epitome de T. Livio Bellorum omnium annorum DCC Libri duo, is written in a bombastic and rhetorical style – a panegyric of the greatness of Rome, the life of which is divided into the periods of infancy, youth and manhood. It is often wrong in geographical and chronological details. In spite of its faults, the book was much used as a handy epitome of Roman history, in the Middle Ages, and survived as a textbook into the 19th century. Florus is credited with being politically unbiased for almost all of his work.[citation needed] However, many will say[who?] that after reviewing his descriptions of the civil war, he seems to position himself closer to Julius Caesar than Pompeius.[3] Florus starts his books with the founding of Rome and ends them with the reign of Augustus.[6] The first book of the Epitome of Roman History is mainly about the establishment and growth of Rome.[6] The second is mainly about the decline of Rome and its changing morals.[6] Florus has taken some criticism on his writing due to inaccuracies found chronologically and geographically in his stories,[3] but even so, the Epitome of Roman History was vastly popular during the late Antiquity and the Middle Ages, as well as being used as a school book until the 19th century.[7] The use of his writings far beyond his time is a testament to his premier narrative skills.[citation needed] In the manuscripts, the writer is variously named as Julius Florus, Lucius Anneus Florus, or simply Annaeus Florus. From certain similarities of style, he has been identified as Publius Annius Florus, poet, rhetorician and friend of Hadrian, author of a dialogue on the question of whether Virgil was an orator or poet, of which the introduction has been preserved. The most accessible modern text and translation are in the Loeb Classical Library (no. 231, published 1984, ISBN 0-674-99254-7). Christopher Plantin, Antwerp, in 1567, published two Lucius Florus texts (two title pages) in one volume. The titles were roughly as follows: 1) L.IVLII Flori de Gestis Romanorum, Historiarum; 2) Commentarius I STADII L.IVLII Flori de Gestis Romanorum, Historiarum. The first title has 149 pages; the second has 222 pages plus an index in a 12mo-size book. Attribution of the works[edit] Tentative attribution Description Works Dates Other bio Identified with Florus "a Roman historian" Epitome of Roman History circa 74-130 born in Africa; lived in the time of Trajan and Hadrian "In the manuscripts, the writer is variously named as Julius Florus, Lucius Anneus Florus, or simply Annaeus Florus"; "he has been identified as Publius Annius Florus" Julius Florus "an ancient Roman poet, orator, and author" Epitome of Roman History ; poems including “Quality of Life”, “Roses in Springtime”, “Roses”, “The Rose”, “Venus’ Rose-Garden”, and “The Nine Muses” circa 74-130 born in Africa; accompanied Tiberius to Armenia; lost Domitian’s Capital Competition due to prejudice; travelled in the Greek Empire; founded a school in Tarraco, Spain; returned to Rome; a friend of Hadrian "variously identified with Julius Florus, a distinguished orator and uncle of Julius Secundus, an intimate friend of Quintilian (Instit. x. 3, 13); with the leader of an insurrection of the Treviri (Tacitus, Ann. iii. 40); with the Postumus of Horace (Odes, ii. 14) and even with the historian Florus." Publius Annius Florus "Roman poet and rhetorician" Virgilius orator an poeta; 26 trochaic tetrameters, De qualitate vitae, and five graceful hexameters, De rosis born in Africa; accompanied Tiberius to Armenia; lost Domitian’s Capital Competition due to prejudice; travelled; founded a school in Tarraco; returned to Rome; knew Hadrian "identified by some authorities with the historian Florus." "generally agreed that he is the Florus who wrote the well-known lines quoted together with Hadrian's answer by Aelius Spartianus" "for an unlikely identification of Florus with the author of the Pervigilium Veneris see E. H. O. Müller, " Tentative biography[edit] The Florus identified as Julius Florus was one of the young men who accompanied Tiberius on his mission to settle the affairs of Armenia. He has been variously identified with Julius Florus, a distinguished orator and uncle of Julius Secundus, an intimate friend of Quintilian (Instit. x. 3, 13); with the leader of an insurrection of the Treviri (Tacitus, Ann. iii. 40); with the Postumus of Horace (Odes, ii. 14) and even with the historian Florus. Under Domitian’s rule, he competed in the Capital Competition,[3] which was an event in which poets received rewards and recognition from the emperor himself.[3] Although he acquired great applause from the crowds, he was not victorious in the event. Florus himself blamed his loss on favoritism on behalf of the emperor.[7] Shortly after his defeat, Florus departed from Rome to travel abroad.[7] His travels are said to have taken him through the Greek-speaking sections of the Roman Empire, taking in Sicily, Crete, the Cyclades, Rhodes, and Egypt.[7] At the conclusion of his travels, he resided in Tarraco, Spain.[3] In Tarraco, Florus founded a school and taught literature.[7] During this time, he also began to write the Epitome of Roman History.[3] After many years in Spain, he eventually migrated back to Rome during the rule of Hadrian (117-138 AD).[3] Hadrian and Florus became very close friends, and Florus was rumored to be involved in government affairs during the second half of Hadrian's rule.[3] Wikisource has original text related to this article: Florus References[edit] ^ a b c "Epitome of Roman History". ^ Saecula Latina (1962), p. 215 ^ a b c d e f g h i j "LacusCurtius • Florus — Epitome". ^ "Cameron, A. "Poetae Novelli" in Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 84 (1980), pp. 127-175. ^ "Florus: Introduction". Lacus Curtius. 2014. Retrieved 2015-12-09. ^ a b c d Lucius Annaeus, Florus (1929). Epitome of Roman History. London: Heinemann. ^ a b c d e "P. Annius Florus".  This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Florus, Publius Annius". Encyclopædia Britannica. 10 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 547.  This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Florus, Julius". Encyclopædia Britannica. 10 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 547. Bibliography[edit] Jona Lendering. "Publius Annius Florus". Livius.org. José Miguel Alonso-Nuñez (2006). "Floro y los historiadores contemporáneos". Acta Classica Universitatis Scientiarum Debreceniensis. 42: 117–126. W. den Boer (1972). Some Minor Roman Historians. Leiden: Brill. Florus (2005) [c. 120]. Römische Geschichte : lateinisch und deutsch. Eingel., übers. und kommentiert von Günter Laser. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.  This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Florus". Encyclopædia Britannica. 10 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 547. External links[edit] Latin and English texts of Florus, Epitome of Roman History, the 1929 Loeb Classical Library translation by E.S. Forster, Bill Thayer's edition at LacusCurtius Authority control BIBSYS: 90589731 BNE: XX835019 BNF: cb11886317b (data) CANTIC: a10779000 CiNii: DA03049174 GND: 100136907 ISNI: 0000 0000 8972 2253 LCCN: n84212566 LNB: 000279979 NKC: jn19990002328 NLA: 35944530 NLG: 217048 NSK: 000084415 NTA: 068190662 RERO: 02-A000063220 SELIBR: 187070 SUDOC: 026656159 Trove: 1157373 VcBA: 495/5059 VIAF: 89604346 WorldCat Identities: viaf-266805890 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Works_attributed_to_Florus&oldid=996640039" Categories: Romans from Africa Roman-era poets Annii 2nd-century poets 2nd-century Romans Hidden categories: Articles with short description Short description matches Wikidata All articles with failed verification Articles with failed verification from December 2015 All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from December 2015 All articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases from December 2015 Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica with Wikisource reference Wikipedia articles incorporating text from the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CANTIC identifiers Wikipedia articles with CINII identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with LNB identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLG identifiers Wikipedia articles with NSK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with RERO identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with Trove identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Year of birth unknown Year of death unknown Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikisource Languages Български Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Español Esperanto Euskara Français Galego Hrvatski Bahasa Indonesia Italiano עברית Latina Magyar Nederlands Norsk bokmål Polski Português Română Русский Shqip Српски / srpski Svenska Українська 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 27 December 2020, at 20:41 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2764 ---- Contemporary Latin - Wikipedia Contemporary Latin From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Form of the Latin language used since the 19th century This article's lead section may be too short to adequately summarize its key points. Please consider expanding the lead to provide an accessible overview of all important aspects of the article. (September 2020) Contemporary Latin Latinitas viva A contemporary Latin inscription at Salamanca University commemorating the visit of Prince Akihito and Princess Michiko of Japan in 1985 (MCMLXXXV). Region Europe Era Developed from Neo Latin between 19th and 20th centuries Language family Indo-European Italic Latino-Faliscan Latin Contemporary Latin Early form Neo Latin Writing system Latin alphabet  Language codes ISO 639-1 la ISO 639-2 lat ISO 639-3 lat Glottolog None This article contains IPA phonetic symbols. Without proper rendering support, you may see question marks, boxes, or other symbols instead of Unicode characters. For an introductory guide on IPA symbols, see Help:IPA. Contemporary Latin is the form of the Latin language used since the end of the 19th century. Various kinds of contemporary Latin can be distinguished, including the use of single words in taxonomy, and the fuller ecclesiastical use in the Catholic Church – but Living or Spoken Latin (the use of Latin as a language in its own right as a full-fledged means of expression) is the primary subject of this article. Contents 1 Token Latin 1.1 Mottos 1.2 Fixed phrases 1.3 In science 1.4 Vernacular vocabulary 2 Ecclesiastical Latin 3 Academic Latin 4 Living Latin 4.1 Origins 4.2 Pronunciation 4.3 Aims 4.3.1 For Latin instruction 4.3.2 For contemporary communication 4.4 Supporting institutions and publications 4.5 On the Internet 4.6 In public spaces 5 Original production 5.1 Poetry 5.2 Prose 5.3 Music 5.4 Cinema 5.5 Television 5.6 T-shirts 6 Translations 7 Dictionaries, glossaries, and phrase books for contemporary Latin 8 See also 9 Notes and references 10 Further reading 10.1 English 10.2 Spanish 10.3 French 10.4 German Token Latin[edit] As a relic of the great importance of New Latin as the formerly dominant international lingua franca down to the 19th century in a great number of fields, Latin is still present in words or phrases used in many languages around the world, and some minor communities use Latin in their speech. Mottos[edit] The official use of Latin in previous eras has survived at a symbolic level in many mottos that are still being used and even coined in Latin to this day. Old mottos like E pluribus unum, found in 1776 on the Seal of the United States, along with Annuit cœptis and Novus ordo seclorum, and adopted by an Act of Congress in 1782, are still in use. Similarly, current pound sterling coins are minted with the Latin inscription ELIZABETH·II·D·G·REG·F·D (Dei Gratia Regina, Fidei Defensatrix, i.e. Queen by the Grace of God, Defender of the Faith). The official motto of the multilingual European Union, adopted as recently as 2000, is the Latin In varietate concordia. Similarly, the motto on the Canadian Victoria Cross is in Latin, perhaps due to Canada's bilingual status. Fixed phrases[edit] Some common phrases that are still in use in many languages have remained fixed in Latin, like the well-known dramatis personae or habeas corpus. In science[edit] Further information: International scientific vocabulary and English words of Greek origin In fields as varied as mathematics, physics, astronomy, medicine, pharmacy, biology, and philosophy[1] Latin still provides internationally accepted names of concepts, forces, objects, and organisms in the natural world. The most prominent retention of Latin occurs in the classification of living organisms and the binomial nomenclature devised by Carl Linnaeus, although the rules of nomenclature used today allow the construction of names which may deviate considerably from historical norms. Another continuation is the use of Latin names for the constellations and celestial objects (used in the Bayer designations of stars), as well as planets and satellites, whose surface features have been given Latin selenographic toponyms since the 17th century. Symbols for many of those chemical elements of the periodic table known in ancient times reflect and echo their Latin names, like Au for aurum (gold) and Fe for ferrum (iron). Vernacular vocabulary[edit] Latin has also contributed a vocabulary for specialised fields such as anatomy and law which has become part of the normal, non-technical vocabulary of various European languages. Latin continues to be used to form international scientific vocabulary and classical compounds. Separately, more than 56% of the vocabulary used in English today derives ultimately from Latin, either directly (28.24%) or through French (28.30%).[2] Ecclesiastical Latin[edit] Main article: Ecclesiastical Latin The Catholic Church has continued to use Latin. Two main areas can be distinguished. One is its use for the official version of all documents issued by the Holy See, which has remained intact to the present. Although documents are first drafted in various vernaculars (mostly Italian), the official version is written in Latin by the Latin Letters Office. The other is its use for the liturgy, which has diminished after the Second Vatican Council of 1962–65, but to some degree resurged half a century later when Pope Benedict XVI[3] encouraged the Latin Mass. After the Church of England published the Book of Common Prayer in English in 1559, a 1560 Latin edition was published for use at universities such as Oxford and the leading public schools, where the liturgy was still permitted to be conducted in Latin,[4] and there have been several Latin translations since. Most recently a Latin edition of the 1979 USA Anglican Book of Common Prayer has appeared.[5] Academic Latin[edit] Latin has also survived to some extent in the context of classical scholarship. Some classical periodicals, like Mnemosyne and the German Hermes, to this day accept articles in Latin for publication.[6] Latin is used in most of the introductions to the critical editions of ancient authors in the Oxford Classical Texts series, and it is also nearly always used for the apparatus criticus of Ancient Greek and Latin texts. The University Orator at the University of Cambridge makes a speech in Latin marking the achievements of each of the honorands at the annual Honorary Degree Congregations, as does the Public Orator at the Encaenia ceremony at the University of Oxford. Harvard and Princeton also have Latin Salutatory commencement addresses every year.[7] The Charles University in Prague[8] and many other universities around the world conduct the awarding of their doctoral degrees in Latin. Other universities and other schools issue diplomas written in Latin. Brown, Sewanee, and Bard College also hold a portion of their graduation ceremonies in Latin. The song Gaudeamus igitur is sung at university opening or graduation ceremonies throughout Europe.[citation needed] Living Latin[edit] Living Latin (Latinitas viva in Latin itself), also known as Spoken Latin, is an effort to revive Latin as a spoken language and as the vehicle for contemporary communication and publication. Involvement in this Latin revival can be a mere hobby or extend to more serious projects for restoring its former role as an international auxiliary language. Origins[edit] After the decline of Latin at the end of the New Latin era started to be perceived, there were attempts to counteract the decline and to revitalize the use of Latin for international communication. In 1815, Miguel Olmo wrote a booklet proposing Latin as the common language for Europe, with the title Otia Villaudricensia ad octo magnos principes qui Vindobonæ anno MDCCCXV pacem orbis sanxerunt, de lingua Latina et civitate Latina fundanda liber singularis ("Leisure[citation needed] of Villaudric to the eight great princes who ordained world peace at Vienna in 1815, an extraordinary book about the Latin language and a Latin state to be founded").[9] In the late 19th century, Latin periodicals advocating the revived use of Latin as an international language started to appear. Between 1889 and 1895, Karl Heinrich Ulrichs published in Italy his Alaudæ.[10] This publication was followed by the Vox Urbis: de litteris et bonis artibus commentarius,[11] published by the architect and engineer Aristide Leonori from 1898, twice a month, until 1913, one year before the outbreak of World War I. The early 20th century, marked by warfare and by drastic social and technological changes, saw few advances in the use of Latin outside academia. Following the beginnings of the re-integration of postwar Europe, however, Latin revivalism gained some strength. One of its main promoters was the former dean of the University of Nancy (France), Prof. Jean Capelle, who in 1952 published a cornerstone article called "Latin or Babel"[12] in which he proposed Latin as an international spoken language. Capelle was called "the soul of the movement" when in 1956 the first International Conference for Living Latin (Congrès international pour le Latin vivant) took place in Avignon,[13] marking the beginning of a new era of the active use of Latin. About 200 participants from 22 different countries took part in that foundational conference. Pronunciation[edit] The essentials of the classical pronunciation had been defined since the early 19th century (e.g. in K.L. Schneider's Elementarlehre der Lateinischen Sprache, 1819), but in many countries there was strong resistance to adopting it in instruction. In English-speaking countries, where the traditional academic pronunciation diverged most markedly from the restored classical model, the struggle between the two pronunciations lasted for the entire 19th century. The transition between Latin pronunciations was long drawn out;[14] in 1907 the "new pronunciation" was officially recommended by the Board of Education for adoption in schools in England.[15][16] Although the older pronunciation, as found in the nomenclature and terminology of various professions, continued to be used for several decades, and in some spheres prevails to the present day, contemporary Latin as used by the living Latin community has generally adopted the classical pronunciation of Latin as restored by specialists in Latin historical phonology.[17] A similar shift occurred in German-speaking areas: the traditional pronunciation is discussed in Deutsche Aussprache des Lateinischen [de] (in German), while the reconstructed classical pronunciation, which took hold around 1900, is discussed at Schulaussprache des Lateinischen [de]. Aims[edit] Many users of contemporary Latin promote its use as a spoken language, a movement that dubs itself "Living Latin". Two main aims can be distinguished in this movement: For Latin instruction[edit] Main article: Instruction in Latin Among the proponents of spoken Latin, some promote the active use of the language to make learning Latin both more enjoyable and more efficient, drawing upon the methodologies of instructors of modern languages. In the United Kingdom, the Association for the Reform of Latin Teaching (ARLT, still existing as the Association for Latin Teaching), was founded in 1913 by the classical scholar W. H. D. Rouse. It arose from summer schools which Rouse organised to train Latin teachers in the direct method of language teaching, which entailed using the language in everyday situations rather than merely learning grammar and syntax by rote. The Classical Association also encourages this approach. The Cambridge University Press has now published a series of school textbooks based on the adventures of a mouse called Minimus, designed to help children of primary school age to learn the language, as well as its well-known Cambridge Latin Course (CLC) to teach the language to secondary school students, all of which include extensive use of dialogue and an approach to language teaching mirroring that now used for most modern languages, which have brought many of the principles espoused by Rouse and the ARLT into the mainstream of Latin teaching. Outside Great Britain, one of the most accomplished handbooks that fully adopts the direct method for Latin is the well-known Lingua Latina per se illustrata by the Dane Hans Henning Ørberg, first published in 1955 and improved in 1990. It is composed fully in Latin, and requires no other language of instruction, and it can be used to teach pupils whatever their mother tongue. For contemporary communication[edit] Others support the revival of Latin as a language of international communication, in the academic, and perhaps even the scientific and diplomatic, spheres (as it was in Europe and European colonies through the Middle Ages until the mid-18th century), or as an international auxiliary language to be used by anyone. However, as a language native to no people, this movement has not received support from any government, national or supranational. Supporting institutions and publications[edit] A substantial group of institutions (particularly in Europe, but also in North and South America) has emerged to support the use of Latin as a spoken language.[18] The foundational first International Conference for living Latin (Congrès international pour le Latin vivant) that took place in Avignon was followed by at least five others.[19] As a result of those first conferences, the Academia Latinitati Fovendae was then created in Rome. Among its most prominent members are well-known classicists from all over the world,[20] like Prof. Michael von Albrecht or Prof. Kurt Smolak [de]. The ALF held its first international conference in Rome in 1966 bringing together about 500 participants. From then on conferences have taken place every four or five years, in Bucharest, Malta, Dakar, Erfurt, Berlin, Madrid, and many other places. The official language of the ALF is Latin and all acts and proceedings take place in Latin. Also in the year 1966 Clément Desessard published a method with tapes within the series sans peine of the French company Assimil. Desessard's work aimed at teaching contemporary Latin for use in an everyday context, although the audio was often criticized for being recorded with a thick French accent. Assimil took this out of print at the end of 2007 and published another Latin method which focused on the classical idiom only. However, in 2015 Assimil re-published Desessard's edition with new audio CDs in restored classical Latin pronunciation. Desessard's method is still used for living Latin instruction at the Schola Latina Universalis. In 1986 the Belgian radiologist Gaius Licoppe, who had discovered the contemporary use of Latin and learnt how to speak it thanks to Desessard's method, founded in Brussels the Fundatio Melissa for the promotion of Latin teaching and use for communication.[21] In Germany, Marius Alexa and Inga Pessarra-Grimm founded in September 1987 the Latinitati Vivæ Provehendæ Associatio (LVPA, or Association for the Promotion of Living Latin).[22] The first Septimana Latina Amoeneburgensis (Amöneburg Latin Week) was organized in 1989 at Amöneburg, near Marburg in Germany, by Mechtild Hofmann and Robert Maier. Since then the Latin Weeks were offered every year. In addition, members of the supporting association Septimanae Latinae Europaeae (European Latin Weeks) published a text book named Piper Salve that contains dialogues in modern everyday Latin.[23] At the Accademia Vivarium Novum located in Rome, Italy, all classes are taught by faculty fluent in Latin or Ancient Greek, and resident students speak in Latin or Greek at all times outside class. Most students are supported by scholarships from the Mnemosyne foundation and spend one or two years in residence to acquire fluency in Latin.[24] The living Latin movement eventually crossed the Atlantic, where it continues to grow. In the summer of 1996, at the University of Kentucky, Prof. Terence Tunberg established the first Conventiculum, an immersion conference in which participants from all over the world meet annually to exercise the active use of Latin to discuss books and literature, and topics related to everyday life.[25] The success of the Conventiculum Lexintoniense has inspired similar conferences throughout the United States. In October 1996 the Septentrionale Americanum Latinitatis Vivæ Institutum (SALVI, or North American Institute for Living Latin Studies) was founded in Los Angeles, by a group of professors and students of Latin literature concerned about the long-term future of classical studies in the US.[26] In the University of Kentucky, Prof. Terence Tunberg founded the Institutum Studiis Latinis Provehendis (known in English as the Institute of Latin Studies), which awards Graduate Certificates in Latin Studies addressed at those with a special interest gaining "a thorough command of the Latin language in reading, writing and speaking, along with a wide exposure to the cultural riches of the Latin tradition in its totality".[27] This is the only degree-conferring program in the world with courses taught entirely in Latin. There is also a proliferation of Latin-speaking institutions, groups and conferences in the Iberian Peninsula and in Latin America. Some prominent examples of this tendency towards the active use of Latin within Spanish and Portuguese-speaking countries are the annual conferences called Jornadas de Culturaclasica.com, held in different cities of southern Spain, as well as the CAELVM (Cursus Aestivus Latinitatis Vivae Matritensis), a Latin summer program in Madrid. In 2012, the Studium Angelopolitanum was founded in Puebla, Mexico, by Prof. Alexis Hellmer, in order to promote the study of Latin in that country, where only one university grants a degree in Classics. Most of these groups and institutions organise seminars and conferences where Latin is used as a spoken language, both throughout the year and over the summer, in Europe and in America.[28] Less academic summer encounters wholly carried out in Latin are the ones known as Septimanæ Latinæ Europææ (European Latin Weeks), celebrated in Germany and attracting people of various ages from all over Europe.[23] At the present time, several periodicals and social networking web sites are published in Latin. In France, immediately after the conference at Avignon, the publisher Théodore Aubanel launched the magazine Vita Latina, which still exists, associated to the CERCAM (Centre d'Étude et de Recherche sur les Civilisations Antiques de la Méditerranée) of the Paul Valéry University, Montpellier III. Until very recently, it was published in Latin in its entirety.[29] In Germany, the magazine Vox Latina was founded in 1965 by Caelestis Eichenseer (1924–2008) and is to this day published wholly in Latin four times a year in the University of Saarbrücken.[30] In Belgium, the magazine Melissa created in 1984 by Gaius Licoppe is still published six times a year completely in Latin.[31] Hebdomada aenigmatum[32] is a free online magazine of crosswords, quizzes, and other games in Latin language. It is published by the Italian cultural Association Leonardo in collaboration with the online Latin news magazine Ephemeris[33] and with ELI publishing house. From 1989 until 2019, Finnish radio station YLE Radio 1 broadcast a weekly review of world news called Nuntii Latini completely in Latin.[34] The German Radio Bremen also had regular broadcasts in Latin until December 2017.[35] Other attempts have been less successful.[36] Beginning from July 2015 Radio F.R.E.I. from Erfurt (Germany) broadcasts in Latin once a week on Wednesdays for 15 minutes; the broadcast is called Erfordia Latina.[37] In 2015 the Italian startup pptArt launched its catalogue (Catalogus)[38] and its registration form for artists (Specimen ad nomina signanda)[39] in Latin and English. In 2016 ACEM (Enel executives' cultural association) organized with Luca Desiata and Daniel Gallagher the first Business Latin course for managers (Congressus studiorum – Lingua Latina mercatoria).[40][41] The government of Finland, during its presidencies of the European Union, issued official newsletters in Latin on top of the official languages of the Union.[42] On the Internet[edit] The emergence of the Internet on a global scale in the 1990s provided a great tool for the flourishing of communication in Latin, and in February 1996[43] a Polish Latinist from Warsaw (Poland), Konrad M. Kokoszkiewicz, founded what is still today the most populated and successful Latin-only email list on the Internet, the Grex Latine Loquentium [la]. Subsequently, the Nuntii Latini of YLE Radio 1 would also create a discussion list called YLE Colloquia Latina.[44] The Circulus Latinus Panormitanus of Palermo (Italy) went a step further creating the first online chat in Latin called the Locutorium.[45] In February 2003 Konrad M. Kokoszkiewicz published an on-line glossary with his proposals for some computer terms in Latin under the title of Vocabula computatralia.[46] The Internet also allows for the preservation of other contemporary Latin dictionaries that have fallen out of print or have never been printed, like the Latinitas Recens (Speculum)[47] or the Adumbratio Lexici Angli et Latini.[48] In June 2004[49] an on-line newspaper Ephemeris was founded once again from Warsaw by Stanisław Tekieli, and is to this day published wholly in Latin about current affairs.[50] In January 2008 a Schola, (membership 1800) a Latin-only social network service, including a real-time video and/or text chatroom, was founded from London (UK).[51] A number of Latin web portals, websites, and blogs in Latin have developed, like Lingua Latina Æterna from Russia[52] or Verba et facta from somewhere in the US.[53] The Internet also provides tools like Latin spell checkers[54] for contemporary Latin writers, or scansion tools[55] for contemporary Latin poets. Some websites, such as Google and Facebook, provide Latin as a language option. The HiRISE (High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment) camera onboard the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (NASA) has Latin language version of their main site, https://uahirise.org/la, as well as a Latin Twitter account, https://twitter.com/HiRISELatin. https://ai.neocities.org/Abracadabra.html is Mens Latina, an artificial intelligence in Latin. There was a MUD text game in Latin called Labyrinthus Latinus aimed at uniting people interested in the language.[citation needed] In addition, the video games Minecraft, OpenTTD, and The Battle for Wesnoth provide Latin as a language option. There is even a Latin Wikipedia, although discussions are held not only in Latin but in German, English, and other languages as well. Nearly 200 active editors work on the project. There are nearly 100,000 articles on topics ranging from ancient Rome [la] to mathematics [la], Tolkien's fiction [la], and geography [la]. Those in particularly good Latin, currently about 10% of the whole, are marked.[56] In public spaces[edit] The ATM with Latin instructions The signs at Wallsend Metro station are in English and Latin as a tribute to Wallsend's role as one of the outposts of the Roman empire. Although less so than in previous eras, contemporary Latin has also been used for public notices in public spaces: The Wallsend Metro station of the Tyne and Wear Metro has signs in Latin. The Vatican City has an automated teller machine with instructions in Latin.[57] Original production[edit] Some contemporary works have been produced originally in Latin, most overwhelmingly poetry,[58] but also prose, as well as music or cinema. They include: Poetry[edit] 1924. Carminum libri quattuor by Tomás Viñas.[59] 1946. Carmina Latina by A. Pinto de Carvalho.[60] 1954. Vox Humana by Johannes Alexander Gaertner.[61] 1962. Pegasus Tolutarius by Henry C. Snurr aka C. Arrius Nurus [la]. 1966. Suaviloquia by Jan Novák. 1966. Cantus Firmus by Johannes Alexander Gaertner.[61] 1972. Carmina by Traian Lăzărescu.[62] 1991. Periegesis Amatoria by Geneviève Immè [la]. 1992. Harmonica vitrea by Anna Elissa Radke [la]. Prose[edit] 1948. Graecarum Litterarum Historia by Antonio d'Elia.[63] 1952. Latinarum Litterarum Historia by Antonio d'Elia.[64] 1961. De sacerdotibus sacerdotiisque Alexandri Magni et Lagidarum eponymis by Jozef IJsewijn.[65] 1965. Sententiæ by Alain van Dievoet (pen name: Alaenus Divutius) [la]. 1966. Mystagogus Lycius, sive de historia linguaque Lyciorum by Wolfgang Jenniges.[66] 2011. Capti: Fabula Menippeo-Hoffmanniana Americana by Stephen A. Berard (pen name: Stephanus Berard) [la].[67][68] 2019. Hebdomada Aenigmatum by Luca Desiata[69][70][71][72][73] Music[edit] 1927. Oedipus Rex by Igor Stravinsky (an opera-oratorio with libretto, based on Sophocles's tragedy, prepared in French by Jean Cocteau and given its final Latin form by Abbé Jean Daniélou). 1994. Ista?!?! by Latin hip hop band Ista. 1995. The works of Elvis Presley have been translated into Latin by Finnish academic Jukka Ammondt.[74][75] 2008. Super Smash Bros. Brawl Main Theme. 2011. Audio, Video, Disco by French electronic group Justice. Cinema[edit] 1976. Sebastiane by Derek Jarman and Paul Humfress.[76] 2004. The Passion of the Christ by Mel Gibson.[77] 2009. Pacifica by Samohi Latin Media (SLAM). 2010. Barnabus & Bella by SLAM. 2013. Imperator, Emperor by Konrad Łęcki. Television[edit] 2008. O Tempora! by the Kulturzeit team (37:44min special broadcast, 22 August 2008) of the German public channel 3sat.[clarification needed][78][79] T-shirts[edit] A T-shirt with the rhyming motto Multi Frigent, Pauci Rigent, "Many are Cold but Few are Frozen" for the fictional University of Antarctica, with a penguin seal, by artist Janice Bender. The motto's translation puns the Christian motto, "Many are Called but Few are Chosen." Translations[edit] See also: List of Latin translations of modern literature Various texts—usually children's books—have been translated into Latin since the beginning of the living Latin movement in the early fifties for various purposes, including use as a teaching tool or simply to demonstrate the capability of Latin as a means of expression in a popular context. They include: 1884. Rebilius Cruso[80] (Robinson Crusoe) tr. Francis William Newman. 1922. Insula Thesavraria (Treasure Island) tr. Arcadius Avellanus. 1928. Vita discriminaque Robinsonis Crusoei (Robinson Crusoe) tr. Arcadius Avellanus. 1960. Winnie Ille Pu (Winnie-the-Pooh) tr. Alexander Lenard. 1962. Ferdinandus Taurus (Ferdinand the Bull) tr. Elizabeth Chamberlayne Hadas. 1962. Fabula De Petro Cuniculo (The Tale of Peter Rabbit) tr. E. Perot Walker. 1964. Alicia in Terra Mirabili (Alice's Adventures in Wonderland) tr. Clive Harcourt Carruthers. 1965. Fabula de Jemima Anate-Aquatica (The Tale of Jemima Puddle-Duck) tr. Jonathan Musgrave. 1966. Aliciae per Speculum Transitus (Quaeque ibi Invenit) (Through the Looking-Glass, and What Alice Found There) tr. Clive Harcourt Carruthers. 1973–present. Asterix[81] (Asterix) 1978. Fabula de Domino Ieremia Piscatore (The Tale of Mr. Jeremy Fisher) tr. E. Perot Walker. 1983. Alix – Spartaci Filius (The Adventures of Alix) 1985. Regulus, vel Pueri Soli Sapiunt (The Little Prince) tr. Augusto Haury 1987. De Titini et Miluli Facinoribus: De Insula Nigra (Tintin comic The Black Island) 1987. The Classical Wizard / Magus Mirabilis in Oz (The Wonderful Wizard of Oz) tr. C.J. Hinke and George Van Buren. 1990. De Titini et Miluli Facinoribus: De Sigaris Pharaonis (Tintin comic Cigars of the Pharaoh) 1991. Tela Charlottae (Charlotte's Web) tr. Bernice Fox. 1994. Sub rota (Beneath the Wheel) tr. Sigrides C. Albert 1998. Quomodo Invidiosulus Nomine Grinchus Christi Natalem Abrogaverit (How the Grinch Stole Christmas!) tr. Jennifer Morrish Tunberg, Terence O. Tunberg. 1998. Winnie Ille Pu Semper Ludet (The House at Pooh Corner) tr. Brian Staples. 2000. Cattus Petasatus (The Cat in the Hat) tr. Jennifer Morish Tunberg, Terence O. Tunberg. 2002. Arbor Alma (The Giving Tree) tr. Terence O. Tunberg, Jennifer Morrish Tunberg. 2003. Virent Ova, Viret Perna (Green Eggs and Ham) tr. Terence O. Tunberg, Jennifer Morrish Tunberg. 2003. Harrius Potter et Philosophi Lapis (Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone) tr. Peter Needham. 2005. Tres Mures Caeci ("Three Blind Mice") tr. David C. Noe. 2006. Harrius Potter et Camera Secretorum (Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets) tr. Peter Needham. 2007. Olivia: the essential Latin edition tr. Amy High. 2009. Over 265 illustrated children's books in Latin have been published on the Tar Heel Reader website. 2009. Murena, Murex et aurum (Murena, La pourpre et l'or) tr. Claude Aziza and Cathy Rousset. 2009. Mundo Novo[82] – adaptation of "A Whole New World" from Disney's Aladdin 2012. Hobbitus Ille (The Hobbit) tr. Mark Walker. Dictionaries, glossaries, and phrase books for contemporary Latin[edit] 1990. Latin for All Occasions, a book by Henry Beard, attempts to find Latin equivalents for contemporary catchphrases. 1992–97. Neues Latein Lexicon / Lexicon recentis Latinitatis by Karl Egger, containing more than 15,000 words for contemporary everyday life. 1998. Imaginum vocabularium Latinum by Sigrid Albert. 1999. Piper Salve by Robert Maier, Mechtild Hofmann, Klaus Sallmann, Sabine Mahr, Sascha Trageser, Dominika Rauscher, Thomas Gölzhäuser. 2010. Visuelles Wörterbuch Latein-Deutsch by Dorling Kindersley, translated by Robert Maier. 2012. Septimana Latina vol. 1+2 edited by Mechtild Hofmann and Robert Maier (based on Piper Salve). See also[edit] Latin edition of Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Library resources about Contemporary Latin Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries Reginald Foster (Latinist) Botanical Latin Latin translations of modern literature Latino sine Flexione Interlingua List of songs with Latin lyrics Notes and references[edit] ^ Yancey, P.H. (March 1944). "Introduction to Biological Latin and Greek". BIOS. 15 (1): 3–14. JSTOR 4604798. ^ According to the computerised survey of about 80,000 words in the old Shorter Oxford Dictionary (3rd ed.) published in Ordered Profusion by Thomas Finkenstaedt and Dieter Wolff, Latin influence in English. ^ "Latin Mass resurgent 50 years after Vatican II". USA TODAY. Retrieved 5 April 2019. ^ "Liber Precum Publicarum – The Book of Common Prayer in Latin (1560)". Justus.anglican.org. Retrieved 10 July 2017. ^ "Liber Precum Publicarum: the 1979 US Book of Common Prayer in Latin". Justus.anglican.org. Retrieved 10 July 2017. ^ Konrad M. Kokoszkiewicz, "A. Gellius, Noctes Atticæ, 16.2.6: tamquam si te dicas adulterum negent", Mnemosyne 58 (2005) 132–135; "Et futura panda siue de Catulli carmine sexto corrigendo", Hermes 132 (2004) 125–128. ^ "Harvard's Latin Salutatory Address 2007". YouTube. 12 June 2007. Retrieved 10 July 2017. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 30 July 2012. Retrieved 19 November 2009.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) ^ IJsewijn, Jozef, Companion to Neo-Latin Studies. Part I. History and Diffusion of Neo-Latin Literature, Leuven University Press, 1990, p. 112s. ^ Cf. Wilfried Stroh (ed.), Alaudæ. Eine lateinische Zeitschrift 1889–1895 herausgegeben von Karl Heinrich Ulrichs. Nachdruck mit einer Einleitung von Wilfried Stroh, Hamburg, MännerschwarmSkript Verlag, 2004. ^ Cf. Volfgangus Jenniges, "Vox Urbis (1898–1913) quid sibi proposuerit", Melissa, 139 (2007) 8–11. ^ Published on 23 October 1952 in the French Bulletin de l'Éducation Nationale, an English version of the same was published in The Classical Journal and signed by himself and Thomas H. Quigley (The Classical Journal, Vol. 49, No. 1, October 1953, pp. 37–40) ^ Goodwin B. Beach, "The Congress for Living Latin: Another View", The Classical Journal, Vol. 53, No. 3, December 1957, pp. 119–122: ^ F. Brittain (1934). Latin in Church (first ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 60. ISBN 9781107675230. ^ "Recommendations of the Classical Association on the Teaching of Latin". Forgottenbooks.com. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 1 October 2015. ^ The School World: A Monthly Magazine of Educational Work and Progress. 9. Macmillan & Co. 1907. ^ E.g. Prof. Edgar H. Sturtevant (The Pronunciation of Greek and Latin, Chicago Ares Publishers Inc. 1940) and Prof. W. Sidney Allen (Vox Latina, A Guide to the Pronunciation of Classical Latin, Cambridge University Press 1965), who followed in the tradition of previous pronunciation reformers; cf. Erasmus's De recta Latini Græcique sermonis pronuntiatione dialogus and even Alcuin's De orthographia. ^ "Vincula – Circulus Latínus Londiniénsis". Circuluslatinuslondiniensis.co.uk. 28 February 2016. Retrieved 10 July 2017. ^ The fifth conference took place in Pau, France, from the 1st to 5 April 1975. ^ "Academia Latinitati Fovendae - SODALES". 11 October 2006. Archived from the original on 11 October 2006. Retrieved 9 October 2018. ^ "MELISSA sodalitas perenni Latinitati dicata". Fundatiomelissa.org. Retrieved 10 July 2017. ^ "Pagina domestica". Latinitati Vivae Provehendae Associatio e.V. (L.V.P.A. e.V). Retrieved 10 July 2017. ^ a b Robert Maier. "Septimanae Latinae Europaeae". Septimanalatina.org. Retrieved 10 July 2017. ^ "Home page". Accademia Vivarium Novum. Archived from the original on 16 November 2011. Retrieved 16 November 2011. ^ "Conventiculum Latinum | Modern & Classical Languages, Literatures & Cultures". Mcl.as.uky.edu. Retrieved 10 July 2017. ^ "About Us | SALVI: Septentrionale Americanum Latinitatis Vivae Institutum". Latin.org. Retrieved 10 July 2017. ^ "Graduate Certificate in Latin Studies – Institute for Latin Studies | Modern & Classical Languages, Literatures & Cultures". Mcl.as.uky.edu. Retrieved 10 July 2017. ^ "Annus Latinus". Latinitati Vivae Provehendae Associatio e.V. (L.V.P.A. e.V.). Archived from the original on 1 January 2009. Retrieved 21 January 2010. ^ "UPVM | Accueil". Recherche.univ-montp3.fr (in French). Archived from the original on 18 July 2011. Retrieved 10 July 2017. ^ "Vox latina". Voxlatina.uni-saarland.de. Retrieved 10 July 2017. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 1 June 2010. Retrieved 29 January 2010.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) ^ "HEBDOMADA AENIGMATUM: The first magazine of Latin crosswords". Mylatinlover.it. Retrieved 10 July 2017. ^ "EPHEMERIS. Nuntii Latini universi". Alcuinus.net. 27 April 2009. Retrieved 10 July 2017. ^ "Nuntii Latini | Radio | Areena". Yle.fi. Retrieved 10 July 2017. ^ "Radio Cicero funkt nicht mehr - Finito". Radiobremen.de. Retrieved 9 October 2018. ^ "Radio Zammù, Università di Catania". Radiozammu.it. 21 July 2007. Retrieved 10 July 2017. ^ "Radio F.R.E.I. Programm". Radiofrei.de. Retrieved 10 July 2017. ^ [1] Archived 7 July 2015 at the Wayback Machine ^ [2] Archived 7 July 2015 at the Wayback Machine ^ Murzio, Antonio (22 June 2016), "L'ingegnere che si diverte con le parole latine", La Stampa ^ "EPHEMERIS. Nuntii Latini universi". Ephemeris.alcuinus.net. Retrieved 10 July 2017. ^ "Newsletters". eu2006.fi – Finland's EU Presidency. Archived from the original on 1 August 2012. Retrieved 21 January 2010. ^ "Victorius Ciarrocchi: De Grege Latine loquentium deque linguae Latinae praestantia". Alcuinus.net. Retrieved 10 July 2017. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 24 March 2010. Retrieved 29 January 2010.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 27 January 2010. Retrieved 29 January 2010.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) ^ "Vocabula computatralia". Obta.uw.edu.pl. Retrieved 10 July 2017. ^ "Latinitas Recens (Speculum)". Latinlexicon.org. Retrieved 10 July 2017. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 5 April 2013. Retrieved 12 March 2013.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) ^ "Ephemeris". Ephemeris.alcuinus.net. 26 June 2004. Retrieved 10 July 2017. ^ "EPHEMERIS. Nuntii Latini universi". Ephemeris.alcuinus.net. 27 April 2009. Archived from the original on 30 August 2019. Retrieved 10 July 2017. ^ [3] Archived 30 June 2012 at the Wayback Machine ^ "Lingua Latina Aeterna :: Latin – a living language | Lingua Latina Aeterna". Linguaeterna.com. 19 April 2013. Retrieved 10 July 2017. ^ "Verba et Facta". Nemo-nusquam.blogspot.com. Retrieved 10 July 2017. ^ "COL – Latin Spellchecker (Microsoft Windows)". Latin.drouizig.org. Retrieved 10 July 2017. ^ "latin poetry / text-to-speech". Poetaexmachina.net. Retrieved 10 July 2017. ^ As of August 2013, there are 94,777 pages, of which about a third are marked as stubs. Among the pages whose Latin has been assessed, 9,658 are marked as having good Latin and just over 500 are marked as poor Latin.[better source needed] ^ "Photographic image of ATM" (JPG). Farm3.static.flickr.com. Retrieved 10 July 2017. ^ "Contemporary Latin Poetry". Suberic.net. ^ IJsewijn, Jozef, Companion to Neo-Latin Studies. Part I. History and Diffusion of Neo-Latin Literature, Leuven University Press, 1990, p. 113. ^ IJsewijn, Jozef, Companion to Neo-Latin Studies. Part I. History and Diffusion of Neo-Latin Literature, Leuven University Press, 1990, p. 123. ^ a b IJsewijn, Jozef, Companion to Neo-Latin Studies. Part I. History and Diffusion of Neo-Latin Literature, Leuven University Press, 1990, p. 293. ^ IJsewijn, Jozef, Companion to Neo-Latin Studies. Part I. History and Diffusion of Neo-Latin Literature, Leuven University Press, 1990, p. 226. ^ "Graecarum Litterarum Historia. By Antonius D'elia S. J.Rome: Angelo signorelli, 1948. Pp.328, with eleven plates and index of writers mentioned. Price: Lire 600. | Greece & Rome | Cambridge Core". Greece and Rome. 18 (54): 141. 1 January 2009. doi:10.1017/S0017383500010688. Retrieved 10 July 2017. ^ Antonii D'Elia (March 1956). "Review: Latinarum litterarum historia". The Classical Journal. The Classical Association of the Middle West and South, Inc. (CAMWS). 51 (6): 289–290. JSTOR 3292896. ^ IJsewijn, Jozef, Companion to Neo-Latin Studies. Part I. History and Diffusion of Neo-Latin Literature, Leuven University Press, 1990, p. 156. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 29 December 2010. Retrieved 28 December 2009.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) ^ "CAPTI and the Sphinx Heptology by Stephen Berard". Boreoccidentales.com. Retrieved 10 July 2017. ^ Albert Baca (5 March 2012). Capti: Fabula Menippeo-Hoffmanniana Americana (Latin Edition): Stephani Berard: 9781456759735: Amazon.com: Books. ISBN 978-1456759735. ^ Squires, Nick (12 November 2014), "Can you crack the world's first Latin crossword", The Telegraph, London ^ Kington, Tom (13 November 2014), "Crossword in Latin is clue the language is alive", The Times, London ^ "Cruciverbum", The Times, London, 13 November 2014 ^ "Hebdomada Aenigmatum: First Latin puzzle book launched", BBC, London, 14 November 2014 ^ Murzio, Antonio (22 June 2016), "L'ingegnere che si diverte con le parole latine", La Stampa ^ "Finnish broadcaster ends Latin news bulletins". RTÉ News. 24 June 2019. Retrieved 25 June 2019. Finland has distinguished itself as a bastion of the language of the Romans in other ways and is the home to academic Jukka Ammondt, who translated Elvis Presley's repertoire into Latin. ^ "Finland makes Latin the King". BBC News. 24 October 2006. ^ Sebastiane on IMDb ^ The Passion of the Christ on IMDb ^ ""Kulturzeit extra: O Tempora!" – 3sat.Mediathek". 3sat.de. 19 December 2011. Archived from the original on 9 March 2012. Retrieved 10 July 2017. ^ "Kulturzeit O Tempora Making Of". YouTube. 2 March 2009. Retrieved 10 July 2017. ^ Rebilius Cruso: Robinson Crusoe, in Latin: a book to lighten tedium to a learner: Defoe, Daniel, 1661?–1731: Free Download & Streaming: Internet Archive. Archive.org. London : Trübner. 1884. Retrieved 10 July 2017. ^ "Asterix around the World – the many Languages of Asterix". Asterix-obelix.nl. 13 April 2017. Retrieved 10 July 2017. ^ TranslatorCarminum (28 July 2009). "Disney's Aladdin – A Whole New World (Latin fandub)" – via YouTube. Further reading[edit] English[edit] Jozef IJzewijn, A companion to neo-Latin studies, 1977. W. H. S. Jones, M.A. Via Nova or The Application of the Direct Method to Latin and Greek, Cambridge University Press 1915. Robin Meyer, "Curtain Call for Latin" in The Linguist vol. 59 no. 1 (2020) pp. 22–23 Spanish[edit] José Juan del Col, ¿Latín hoy?, published by the Instituto Superior Juan XXIII, Bahía Blanca, Argentina, 1998 ("Microsoft Word - LATINHOY.doc" (PDF). Juan23.edu.ar. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 February 2009. Retrieved 10 July 2017. ) French[edit] Guy Licoppe, Pourquoi le latin aujourd'hui ?: (Cur adhuc discenda sit lingua Latina), s.l., 1989 Françoise Waquet, Le latin ou l'empire d'un signe, XVIe–XXe siècle, Paris, Albin Michel, 1998. Guy Licoppe, Le latin et le politique: les avatars du latin à travers les âges, Brussels, 2003. German[edit] Wilfried Stroh, Latein ist tot, es lebe Latein!: Kleine Geschichte einer großen Sprache ( ISBN 9783471788295) v t e Ages of Latin until 75 BC Old Latin 75 BC – 200 AD Classical Latin 200–900 Late Latin 900–1300 Medieval Latin 1300–1500 Renaissance Latin 1500–1900 New Latin 1900–present Contemporary Latin History of Latin Latin literature Vulgar Latin Ecclesiastical Latin Romance languages Latino sine flexione Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum Hiberno-Latin Judeo-Latin Languages portal Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Contemporary_Latin&oldid=993806786" Categories: Latin language Forms of Latin Language revival Latin-language literature History of literature Languages attested from the 19th century Hidden categories: CS1 maint: archived copy as title Articles containing German-language text Articles containing Latin-language text Articles containing French-language text CS1 French-language sources (fr) Webarchive template wayback links All articles lacking reliable references Articles lacking reliable references from December 2016 Articles with short description Short description matches Wikidata Wikipedia introduction cleanup from September 2020 All pages needing cleanup Articles covered by WikiProject Wikify from September 2020 All articles covered by WikiProject Wikify Use dmy dates from August 2017 Languages without Glottolog code Languages with ISO 639-2 code Languages with ISO 639-1 code Language articles with unreferenced extinction date All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from October 2019 Articles with unsourced statements from April 2017 Articles with German-language sources (de) Articles containing Polish-language text Articles with unsourced statements from January 2020 Articles containing Romanian-language text Wikipedia articles needing clarification from July 2014 Articles containing Spanish-language text Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages العربية Asturianu Čeština Deutsch Español Esperanto Français Interlingua Latina Polski Português Русский Slovenčina Edit links This page was last edited on 12 December 2020, at 16:25 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2769 ---- Preface to the Lyrical Ballads - Wikipedia Preface to the Lyrical Ballads From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search The preface to the Lyrical Ballads is an essay, composed by William Wordsworth, for the second edition (published in January 1801, and often referred to as the "1800 Edition") of the poetry collection Lyrical Ballads, and then greatly expanded in the third edition of 1802. It has come to be seen as a de facto manifesto of the Romantic movement. The four guidelines of the manifesto include: Ordinary life is the best subject for poetry. (Wordsworth uses common man's language.) Everyday language is best suited for poetry Expression of feeling is more important than action or plot "Poetry is the spontaneous overflow of emotion" that "takes its origin from emotion, recollected in tranquility." - William Wordsworth External links[edit] Wikisource has original text related to this article: Preface to The Lyrical Ballads Preface to Lyrical Ballads 1802 v t e William Wordsworth Topics Early life Lake Poets Lyrical Ballads Preface to the Lyrical Ballads "Anecdote for Fathers" "The Idiot Boy" "Lucy Gray" The Lucy poems "She dwelt among the untrodden ways" "A slumber did my spirit seal" "Strange fits of passion have I known" "Three years she grew in sun and shower" The Matthew poems "Michael, a Pastoral" Lines Written a Few Miles above Tintern Abbey "Poor Susan" "We Are Seven" Later poetry Poems, in Two Volumes Peter Bell The White Doe of Rylstone "Composed upon Westminster Bridge" "Elegiac Stanzas" "I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud" The Lucy poems "I travelled among unknown men" "London, 1802" "My Heart Leaps Up" "Ode: Intimations of Immortality" "Resolution and Independence" "The Solitary Reaper" "The World Is Too Much with Us" "To a Butterfly" "Character of the Happy Warrior" The Recluse The Excursion The Prelude Prose Guide to the Lakes People Dora Wordsworth (daughter) Dorothy Wordsworth (sister) Christopher Wordsworth (brother) Samuel Taylor Coleridge Robert Southey Homes Wordsworth House (birthplace and childhood home) Alfoxton House (1797-1798) Dove Cottage (1799-1808) Allan Bank (1808-1811) Rydal Mount (1813-1850) Related Wordsworth Trust This article about a literary essay or essay collection is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. v t e This poetry-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. v t e Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Preface_to_the_Lyrical_Ballads&oldid=975782628" Categories: Works by William Wordsworth 1800 works British poetry Essays in literary theory 1800s essays Essays about poetry Literature book stubs Essay stubs Poetry stubs Hidden categories: AC with 0 elements All stub articles Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages العربية Italiano Edit links This page was last edited on 30 August 2020, at 11:35 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2777 ---- View source for Horace - Wikipedia View source for Horace ← Horace Jump to navigation Jump to search You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons: Your IP address is in a range that has been blocked on all Wikimedia Foundation wikis. The block was made by Jon Kolbert (meta.wikimedia.org). The reason given is Open Proxy: Webhost: Contact stewards if you are affected . Start of block: 20:12, 23 July 2019 Expiry of block: 20:12, 23 January 2022 Your current IP address is 40.76.139.33 and the blocked range is 40.76.0.0/16. Please include all above details in any queries you make. If you believe you were blocked by mistake, you can find additional information and instructions in the No open proxies global policy. Otherwise, to discuss the block please post a request for review on Meta-Wiki or send an email to the stewards OTRS queue at stewards@wikimedia.org including all above details. You are currently unable to edit Wikipedia due to a block affecting your IP address. This does not affect your ability to read Wikipedia pages. Most people who see this message have done nothing wrong. Some kinds of blocks restrict editing from specific service providers or telecom companies in response to recent abuse or vandalism, and affect other users who are unrelated to that abuse. See below if you do not believe you have done anything wrong. Editing from 40.76.0.0/16 has been blocked (disabled) by ‪SQL‬ for the following reason(s): The IP address that you are currently using has been blocked because it is believed to be a web host provider or colocation provider. To prevent abuse, web hosts and colocation providers may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You will not be able to edit Wikipedia using a web host or colocation provider because it hides your IP address, much like a proxy or VPN. We recommend that you attempt to use another connection to edit. For example, if you use a proxy or VPN to connect to the internet, turn it off when editing Wikipedia. If you edit using a mobile connection, try using a Wi-Fi connection, and vice versa. If you have a Wikipedia account, please log in. If you do not have any other way to edit Wikipedia, you will need to request an IP block exemption. If you are confident that you are not using a web host, you may appeal this block by adding the following text on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is _______. Place any further information here. ~~~~}}. You must fill in the blank with your IP address for this block to be investigated. Your IP address can be determined here. Alternatively, if you wish to keep your IP address private you can use the unblock ticket request system. There are several reasons you might be editing using the IP address of a web host or colocation provider (such as if you are using VPN software or a business network); please use this method of appeal only if you think your IP address is in fact not a web host or colocation provider. Administrators: The IP block exemption user right should only be applied to allow users to edit using web host in exceptional circumstances, and requests should usually be directed to the functionaries team via email. If you intend to give the IPBE user right, a CheckUser needs to take a look at the account. This can be requested most easily at SPI Quick Checkuser Requests. Unblocking an IP or IP range with this template is highly discouraged without at least contacting the blocking administrator. This block has been set to expire: 16:25, 2 June 2023. Even when blocked, you will usually still be able to edit your user talk page and email other editors and administrators. For information on how to proceed, first see the FAQ for blocked users and the guideline on block appeals. The guide to appealing blocks may also be helpful. Other useful links: Blocking policy · Help:I have been blocked You can view and copy the source of this page: ==Further reading== * {{cite book|last=Davis|first=Gregson|title=Polyhymnia the Rhetoric of Horatian Lyric Discourse|year=1991|publisher=University of California Press|location=Berkeley|isbn=0-520-91030-3}} * {{cite book|last=Fraenkel|first=Eduard|title=Horace|year=1957|publisher=Clarendon Press|location=Oxford}} * {{cite book|last=Horace|title=The Complete Works of Horace|year=1983|publisher=Ungar|location=New York|isbn=0-8044-2404-7|others=Charles E. Passage, trans}} * {{cite book|last=Johnson|first=W. R.|title=Horace and the Dialectic of Freedom: Readings in Epistles 1|url=https://archive.org/details/horacedialectico00john|url-access=registration|year=1993|publisher=Cornell University Press|location=Ithaca|isbn=0-8014-2868-8}} * {{cite book|last=Lyne|first=R.O.A.M.|title=Horace: Behind the Public Poetry|year=1995|publisher=Yale Univ. Press|location=New Haven|isbn=0-300-06322-9}} * {{cite book | last = Lyons | first = Stuart | title = Horace's Odes and the Mystery of Do-Re-Mi | publisher = Aris & Phillips | year = 1997 }} * {{cite book | last = Lyons | first = Stuart | title = Music in the Odes of Horace | publisher = Aris & Phillips | year = 2010 }} * {{cite book | last = Michie | first = James | title = The Odes of Horace | publisher = Rupert Hart-Davis | year = 1964 }} * {{cite book|last=Newman|first=J.K.|title=Augustus and the New Poetry|year=1967|publisher=Latomus, revue d’études latines|location=Brussels}} * {{cite book|last=Noyes|first=Alfred|title=Horace: A Portrait|url=https://archive.org/details/horaceportrait0000noye|url-access=registration|year=1947|publisher=Sheed and Ward|location=New York}} * {{cite book|last=Perret|first=Jacques|title=Horace|year=1964|publisher=New York University Press|location=New York|others=Bertha Humez, trans}} * {{cite book|last=Putnam|first=Michael C.J.|title=Artifices of Eternity: Horace's Fourth Book of Odes|year=1986|publisher=Cornell University Press|location=Ithaca, NY|isbn=0-8014-1852-6|url=https://archive.org/details/artificesofetern00putn}} * {{cite book|last=Reckford|first=Kenneth J.|title=Horace|year=1969|publisher=Twayne|location=New York}} * {{cite book|editor-last=Rudd|editor-first=Niall|title=Horace 2000: A Celebration – Essays for the Bimillennium|year=1993|publisher=Univ. of Michigan Press|location=Ann Arbor|isbn=0-472-10490-X}} * {{cite book | last = Sydenham | first = Colin | title = Horace: The Odes | publisher = Duckworth | year = 2005 }} *{{cite book | last = West | first = David | title = Horace The Complete Odes and Epodes | publisher = Oxford University Press | year = 1997 }} * {{cite book|last=Wilkinson|first=L.P.|title=Horace and His Lyric Poetry|year=1951|publisher=Cambridge University Press|location=Cambridge}} Return to Horace. Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horace" Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Page information Wikidata item Languages Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2780 ---- Lyric poetry - Wikipedia Lyric poetry From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Literature Major forms Novel Poetry Drama Short story Novella Genres Adventure Comedy Drama Epic Erotic Nonsense Lyric Mythopoeia Rogue Romance Satire Speculative fiction Tragedy Tragicomedy Media Performance Play Books Techniques Prose Poetry History and lists History modern Outline Glossary of terms Books Writers Literary awards poetry Discussion Criticism Theory (critical theory) Sociology Magazines  Literature portal v t e Henry Oliver Walker's 1896 Lyric Poetry in the Library of Congress's Thomas Jefferson Building Lyric poetry is a formal type of poetry which expresses personal emotions or feelings, typically spoken in the first person.[1] It is not equivalent to song lyrics, though they are often in the lyric mode. The term derives from a form of Ancient Greek literature, the lyric, which was defined by its musical accompaniment, usually on a stringed instrument known as a lyre.[2] The term owes its importance in literary theory to the division developed by Aristotle between three broad categories of poetry: lyrical, dramatic, and epic. Contents 1 Meters 2 History 2.1 Antiquity 2.1.1 Greece 2.1.2 Rome 2.1.3 China 2.2 Medieval verse 2.3 16th century 2.4 17th century 2.5 18th century 2.6 19th century 2.7 20th century 2.8 21st century 3 References 4 Further reading Meters[edit] Much lyric poetry depends on regular meter based either on number of syllables or on stress. The most common meters are as follows: Iambic – two syllables, with the short or unstressed syllable followed by the long or stressed syllable. Trochaic – two syllables, with the long or stressed syllable followed by the short or unstressed syllable. In English, this metre is found almost entirely in lyric poetry.[3] Pyrrhic – Two unstressed syllables Anapestic – three syllables, with the first two short or unstressed and the last long or stressed. Dactylic – three syllables, with the first one long or stressed and the other two short or unstressed. Spondaic – two syllables, with two successive long or stressed syllables. Some forms have a combination of meters, often using a different meter for the refrain. History[edit] Antiquity[edit] Alcaeus and Sappho depicted on an Attic red-figure calathus c. 470 BC[4] Greece[edit] Main article: Greek lyric For the ancient Greeks, lyric poetry had a precise technical meaning: verse that was accompanied by a lyre, cithara, or barbitos. Because such works were typically sung, it was also known as melic poetry. The lyric or melic poet was distinguished from the writer of plays (although Athenian drama included choral odes, in lyric form), the writer of trochaic and iambic verses (which were recited), the writer of elegies (accompanied by the flute, rather than the lyre) and the writer of epic.[5] The scholars of Hellenistic Alexandria created a canon of nine lyric poets deemed especially worthy of critical study. These archaic and classical musician-poets included Sappho, Alcaeus, Anacreon and Pindar. Archaic lyric was characterized by strophic composition and live musical performance. Some poets, like Pindar extended the metrical forms in odes to a triad, including strophe, antistrophe (metrically identical to the strophe) and epode (whose form does not match that of the strophe).[6] Rome[edit] Among the major surviving Roman poets of the classical period, only Catullus (N° 11, 17, 30, 34, 51, 61) and Horace (Odes) wrote lyric poetry, which in the disputed view of some commentators[7] was no longer meant to be sung but instead read or recited. What remained were the forms, the lyric meters of the Greeks adapted to Latin. Catullus was influenced by both archaic and Hellenistic Greek verse and belonged to a group of Roman poets called the Neoteroi ("New Poets") who spurned epic poetry following the lead of Callimachus. Instead, they composed brief, highly polished poems in various thematic and metrical genres. The Roman love elegies of Tibullus, Propertius, and Ovid (Amores, Heroides), with their personal phrasing and feeling, may be the thematic ancestor of much medieval, Renaissance, Romantic, and modern lyric poetry, but these works were composed in elegiac couplets and so were not lyric poetry in the ancient sense.[8] China[edit] Main article: Classical Chinese poetry During China's Warring States period, the Songs of Chu collected by Qu Yuan and Song Yu defined a new form of poetry that came from the exotic Yangtze Valley, far from the Wei and Yellow River homeland of the traditional four-character verses collected in the Book of Songs. The varying forms of the new Chu Ci provided more rhythm and greater latitude of expression.[10] Medieval verse[edit] Originating in 10th-century Persian, a ghazal is a poetic form consisting of couplets that share a rhyme and a refrain. Formally, it consists of a short lyric composed in a single meter with a single rhyme throughout. The central subject is love. Notable authors include Hafiz, Amir Khusro, Auhadi of Maragheh, Alisher Navoi, Obeid e zakani, Khaqani Shirvani, Anvari, Farid al-Din Attar, Omar Khayyam, and Rudaki. The ghazal was introduced to European poetry in the early 19th century by the Germans Schlegel, Von Hammer-Purgstall, and Goethe, who called Hafiz his "twin".[11] Lyric in European literature of the medieval or Renaissance period means a poem written so that it could be set to music—whether or not it actually was. A poem's particular structure, function, or theme might all vary.[12] The lyric poetry of Europe in this period was created by the pioneers of courtly poetry and courtly love largely without reference to the classical past.[13] The troubadors, travelling composers and performers of songs, began to flourish towards the end of the 11th century and were often imitated in successive centuries. Trouvères were poet-composers who were roughly contemporary with and influenced by the troubadours but who composed their works in the northern dialects of France. The first known trouvère was Chrétien de Troyes (fl. 1160s–80s). The dominant form of German lyric poetry in the period was the minnesang, "a love lyric based essentially on a fictitious relationship between a knight and his high-born lady".[14] Initially imitating the lyrics of the French troubadours and trouvères, minnesang soon established a distinctive tradition.[14] There was also a large body of medieval Galician-Portuguese lyric.[15] Hebrew singer-poets of the Middle Ages included Yehuda Halevi, Solomon ibn Gabirol, and Abraham ibn Ezra. In Italy, Petrarch developed the sonnet form pioneered by Giacomo da Lentini and Dante's Vita Nuova. In 1327, according to the poet, the sight of a woman called Laura in the church of Sainte-Claire d'Avignon awoke in him a lasting passion, celebrated in the Rime sparse ("Scattered rhymes"). Later, Renaissance poets who copied Petrarch's style named this collection of 366 poems Il Canzoniere ("The Song Book"). Laura is in many ways both the culmination of medieval courtly love poetry and the beginning of Renaissance love lyric. A bhajan or kirtan is a Hindu devotional song. Bhajans are often simple songs in lyrical language expressing emotions of love for the Divine. Notable authors include Kabir, Surdas, and Tulsidas. Chinese Sanqu poetry was a Chinese poetic genre popular from the 12th-century Jin Dynasty through to the early Ming. Early 14th-century playwrights like Ma Zhiyuan and Guan Hanqing were well-established writers of Sanqu. Against the usual tradition of using Classical Chinese, this poetry was composed in the vernacular.[16] 16th century[edit] In 16th-century Britain, Thomas Campion wrote lute songs and Sir Philip Sidney, Edmund Spenser, and William Shakespeare popularized the sonnet. In France, La Pléiade—including Pierre de Ronsard, Joachim du Bellay, and Jean-Antoine de Baïf—aimed to break with earlier traditions of French poetry—particularly Marot and the grands rhétoriqueurs—and began imitating classical Greek and Roman forms such as the odes. Favorite poets of the school were Pindar, Anacreon, Alcaeus, Horace, and Ovid. They also produced Petrarchan sonnet cycles. Spanish devotional poetry adapted the lyric for religious purposes. Notable examples were Teresa of Ávila, John of the Cross, Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz, Garcilaso de la Vega, and Lope de Vega. Although better known for his epic Os Lusíadas, Luís de Camões is also considered the greatest Portuguese lyric poet of the period. In Japan, the naga-uta ("long song") was a lyric poem popular in this era. It alternated five and seven-syllable lines and ended with an extra seven-syllable line. 17th century[edit] Lyrical poetry was the dominant form of 17th-century English poetry from John Donne to Andrew Marvell.[17] The poems of this period were short. Rarely narrative, they tended towards intense expression.[17] Other notable poets of the era include Ben Jonson, Robert Herrick, George Herbert, Aphra Behn, Thomas Carew, John Suckling, Richard Lovelace, John Milton, Richard Crashaw, and Henry Vaughan. A German lyric poet of the period is Martin Opitz; in Japan, this was the era of the noted haiku-writer Matsuo Bashō. 18th century[edit] In the 18th century, lyric poetry declined in England and France. The atmosphere of literary discussion in the English coffeehouses and French salons was not congenial to lyric poetry.[18] Exceptions include the lyrics of Robert Burns, William Cowper, Thomas Gray, and Oliver Goldsmith. German lyric poets of the period include Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Novalis, Friedrich Schiller, and Johann Heinrich Voß. Kobayashi Issa was a Japanese lyric poet during this period. In Diderot's Encyclopédie, Louis chevalier de Jaucourt described lyric poetry of the time as "a type of poetry totally devoted to sentiment; that's its substance, its essential object".[19] 19th century[edit] Benjamin Haydon's 1842 portrait of William Wordsworth In Europe, the lyric emerged as the principal poetic form of the 19th century and came to be seen as synonymous with poetry.[20] Romantic lyric poetry consisted of first-person accounts of the thoughts and feelings of a specific moment; the feelings were extreme but personal.[21] The traditional sonnet was revived in Britain, with William Wordsworth writing more sonnets than any other British poet.[20] Other important Romantic lyric writers of the period include Samuel Taylor Coleridge, John Keats, Percy Bysshe Shelley, and Lord Byron. Later in the century, the Victorian lyric was more linguistically self-conscious and defensive than the Romantic forms had been.[22] Such Victorian lyric poets include Alfred Lord Tennyson and Christina Rossetti. Lyric poetry was popular with the German reading public between 1830 and 1890, as shown in the number of poetry anthologies published in the period.[23] According to Georg Lukács, the verse of Joseph von Eichendorff exemplified the German Romantic revival of the folk-song tradition initiated by Goethe, Herder, and Arnim and Brentano's Des Knaben Wunderhorn.[24] France also saw a revival of the lyric voice during the 19th century.[25] The lyric became the dominant mode of French poetry during this period.[26] For Walter Benjamin, Charles Baudelaire was the last example of lyric poetry "successful on a mass scale" in Europe.[27] In Russia, Aleksandr Pushkin exemplified a rise of lyric poetry during the 18th and early 19th centuries.[28] The Swedish "Phosphorists" were influenced by the Romantic movement and their chief poet Per Daniel Amadeus Atterbom produced many lyric poems.[29] Italian lyric poets of the period include Ugo Foscolo, Giacomo Leopardi, Giovanni Pascoli, and Gabriele D'Annunzio. Spanish lyric poets include Gustavo Adolfo Bécquer, Rosalía de Castro, and José de Espronceda. Japanese lyric poets include Taneda Santoka, Masaoka Shiki, and Ishikawa Takuboku. 20th century[edit] Further information: 20th century lyric poetry Play media Recited Portuguese lyric poetry In the earlier years of the 20th century rhymed lyric poetry, usually expressing the feelings of the poet, was the dominant poetic form in the United States,[30] Europe, and the British colonies. The English Georgian poets and their contemporaries such as A. E. Housman, Walter de la Mare, and Edmund Blunden used the lyric form. The Bengali poet Rabindranath Tagore was praised by William Butler Yeats for his lyric poetry; Yeats compared him to the troubadour poets when the two met in 1912.[31] The relevance and acceptability of the lyric in the modern age was, though, called into question by modernist poets such as Ezra Pound, T. S. Eliot, H.D., and William Carlos Williams, who rejected the English lyric form of the 19th century, feeling that it relied too heavily on melodious language, rather than complexity of thought.[32] After World War II, the American New Criticism returned to the lyric, advocating a poetry that made conventional use of rhyme, meter and stanzas, and was modestly personal in the lyric tradition.[33] Lyric poetry dealing with relationships, sex and domestic life constituted the new mainstream of American poetry in the late 20th century following the confessional poets of the 1950s and '60s such as Sylvia Plath and Anne Sexton.[34] 21st century[edit] With the advancement of internet communication technology, poetry saw a surge in various online media especially podcasts. Kevin Young, poetry editor at The New Yorker, marked that "podcasts connect poetry to a living thing".[35][36][37] References[edit] ^ Scott,Clive, Vers libre : the emergence of free verse in France, 1886–1914 Clarendon Press, Oxford ISBN 9780198151593 ^ Miller, Andrew. Greek Lyric: An Anthology in Translation/books?id=80MpjrOfTH8C&pg=PR12 pp. xii ff]. Hackett Publishing (Indianapolis), 1996. ISBN 978-0872202917. ^ Stephen Adams, Poetic Designs: an introduction to meters, verse forms, and figures of speech, Broadview Press, 1997, p55. ISBN 1-55111-129-2 ^ Staatliche Antikensammlungen (Inv. 2416) ^ Bowra, Cecil. Greek Lyric Poetry: From Alcman to Simonides, p. 3. Oxford University Press (Oxford), 1961. ^ Halporn, James & al. The Meters of Greek and Latin Poetry, p. 16. Hackett Publishing, 1994. ISBN 0-87220-243-7. ^ S Lyons 'Music in the Odes of Horace (2010) provides evidence to the contrary. ^ Bing, Peter & al. Games of Venus: An Anthology of Greek and Roman Erotic Verse from Sappho to Ovid. Routledge (New York), 1991. ^ a b 袁行霈 [Yuán Xíngpèi] & al. 《中国文学史》 [Zhōngguó Wénxué Shǐ, A History of Chinese Literature], Vol. 1, p. 632 Archived 4 October 2013 at the Wayback Machine. 高等教育出版社 [Gāoděng Jiàoyù Chūbǎn Shè] (Beijing), 1992. ISBN 9787040164794. Accessed 14 July 2013. (in Chinese) ^ 「《史记·屈原贾生列传》…形成悲愤深沉之风格特征。」[9] ^ Thym, Jurgen & al. Of Poetry and Song: Approaches to the Nineteenth-Century Lied, p. 221. University of Rochester Press (Rochester), 2010. ^ Shaw, Mary. The Cambridge Introduction to French Poetry, pp. 39–40. Cambridge University Press (Cambridge), 2003. ISBN 0-521-00485-3. ^ Kay, Sarah & al. A Short History of French Literature, pp. 15–16. Oxford University Press (Oxford), 2006. ISBN 0-19-815931-5. ^ a b Johnson, Sidney & al. Medieval German Literature: A Companion, p. 224–25. Routledge, 2000. ISBN 0-415-92896-6. ^ Tavani, Giuseppe. Trovadores e Jograis: Introdução à poesia medieval galego-portuguesa. Caminho (Lisbon), 2002. (in Portuguese) ^ 「抒情性文学…的创作开创了元代理学家诗文创作的先河。」[9] ^ a b Corns, Thomas. The Cambridge Companion to English Poetry, Donne to Marvell, p. xi. Cambridge University Press (Cambridge), 1993. ISBN 0-521-42309-0. ^ Sir Albert Wilson in J. O. Lindsay's The New Cambridge Modern History, p. 73. Cambridge University Press (Cambridge), 1957. ISBN 0-521-04545-2. ^ "Lyric Poetry". Encyclopedia of Diderot & d'Alembert – Collaborative Translation Project. University of Michigan Library. 20 December 2004. Retrieved 1 April 2015. ^ a b Christopher John Murray, Encyclopedia of the Romantic Era, 1760–1850, Taylor & Francis, 2004, p700. ISBN 1-57958-422-5 ^ Stephen Bygrave, Romantic Writings, Routledge, 1996, pix. ISBN 0-415-13577-X ^ E. Warwick Slinn in Joseph Bristow, The Cambridge Companion to Victorian Poetry, Cambridge University Press, p56. ISBN 0-521-64680-4 ^ Eda Sagarra and Peter Skrine, A Companion to German Literature: From 1500 to the Present, Blackwell Publishing, 1997, p149. ISBN 0-631-21595-6 ^ Lukács, György. German Realists in the Nineteenth Century, p. 56. MIT Press (Cambridge), 1993. ISBN 0-262-62143-6. ^ Prendergast, Christopher. Nineteenth-Century French Poetry: Introductions to Close Reading, p. 3. Cambridge University Press (Cambridge), 1990. ISBN 0-521-34774-2. ^ Prendergast (1990), p. 15. ^ Pensky, Max. Melancholy Dialectics: Walter Benjamin and the Play of Mourning, p. 155. University of Massachusetts Press (Boston), 1993. ISBN 1-55849-296-8. ^ Jakobson, Roman. Selected Writings, p. 282. Walter de Gruyter, 1981. ISBN 90-279-7686-4. ^ Richardson, William & al. Literature of the World: An Introductory Study, p. 348. Kessinger Publishing, 2005. ISBN 1-4179-9433-9. ^ MacGowan, Christopher. Twentieth-Century American Poetry, p. 9. Blackwell Publishing, 2004. ISBN 0-631-22025-9. ^ Foster, Robert. W.B. Yeats: A Life, p. 496. Oxford University Press (Oxford). ISBN 0-19-288085-3. ^ Beach, Christopher. The Cambridge Introduction to Twentieth-Century American Poetry, p. 49. Cambridge University Press (Cambridge), 2003. ISBN 0-521-89149-3. ^ Fredman, Stephen. A Concise Companion To Twentieth-Century American Poetry, p. 63. Blackwell Publishing, 2005. ISBN 1-4051-2002-9. ^ Beach (2003), p. 155. ^ VERMA, JEEVIKA (29 June 2019). "Podcasts Are Providing A New Way Into Poetry". NPR. Retrieved 14 May 2020. ^ "Omer's Poetry Podcast". Retrieved 14 May 2020. ^ Toledano, Omer (30 April 2020). OM, THE UNIVERSE AND I: A Poetry Collection. Independently published. ISBN 979-8619332391. Further reading[edit] Wikisource has the text of the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica article Lyrical poetry. Wilhelm, James J., (editor), Lyrics of the Middle Ages : an anthology, New York : Garland Pub., 1990. ISBN 0-8240-7049-6 v t e Lists of poets By language Afrikaans Albanian Arabic Armenian Azerbaijani Assamese Awadhi Belarusian Bengali Bosnian Bulgarian Catalan Chinese Croatian Danish Dutch English French German Greek (Ancient) Gujarati Hebrew Hindi Icelandic Indonesian Irish Italian Japanese Kashmiri Konkani Kannada Korean Kurdish Latin Maithili Malayalam Maltese Manipuri Marathi Nepali Oriya Pashto Pennsylvania Dutch Persian Polish Portuguese Punjabi Rajasthani Romanian Russian Sanskrit Sindhi Slovak Slovenian Sorbian Spanish Swedish Syriac Tamil Telugu Turkic Ukrainian Urdu Uzbek Welsh Yiddish By nationality or culture Afghan American Argentine Australian Austrian Bangladeshi Bosniak Brazilian Breton Bulgarian Canadian Chicano Estonian Finnish Ghanaian Greek Indian Iranian Iraqi Irish Israeli Mexican Nepalese New Zealander Nicaraguan Nigerian Ottoman Pakistani Peruvian Romani Romanian Somali South African Swedish Swiss Syrian Turkish By type Anarchist Early-modern women (UK) Feminist Lyric Modernist National Performance Romantic Speculative Surrealist War Women Authority control GND: 4036774-5 LCCN: sh85079180 NDL: 00575071 NKC: fd132781 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lyric_poetry&oldid=996632944" Categories: Genres of poetry Hidden categories: Articles containing Chinese-language text Webarchive template wayback links Articles with Chinese-language sources (zh) Articles with Portuguese-language sources (pt) Use dmy dates from April 2020 Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with NDL identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Articles containing video clips Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Afrikaans Alemannisch العربية Արեւմտահայերէն Azərbaycanca বাংলা Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ Български Boarisch Bosanski Català Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Frysk 한국어 Հայերեն Hrvatski Ido Bahasa Indonesia Italiano עברית ქართული Қазақша Кыргызча Latina Lëtzebuergesch Lietuvių Magyar Македонски Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча Plattdüütsch Polski Português Română Русиньскый Русский Shqip Simple English سنڌي Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Svenska తెలుగు Türkçe Українська 吴语 Žemaitėška 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 27 December 2020, at 19:50 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2781 ---- Fulgentius - Wikipedia Fulgentius From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Fulgentius is a Latin male given name which means "bright, brilliant". It may refer to: Fabius Planciades Fulgentius (5th–6th century), Latin grammarian Saint Fulgentius of Ruspe (5th–6th century), bishop of Ruspe, North Africa, possibly related to the above; some authorities believe them to be the same person Fulgentius Ferrandus (6th century), deacon of Carthage, Fulgentius of Ruspe's pupil and biographer Saint Fulgentius of Cartagena (6th–7th century), bishop of Écija, Hispania Gottschalk of Orbais, nicknamed Fulgentius (9th century), monk, theologian and poet See also[edit] Fulgencio Name list This page or section lists people that share the same given name. If an internal link led you here, you may wish to change that link to point directly to the intended article. Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fulgentius&oldid=699067497" Categories: Latin masculine given names Hidden categories: Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata All set index articles Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Deutsch Español Nederlands Português Русский Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Edit links This page was last edited on 10 January 2016, at 01:46 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2801 ---- Procopius - Wikipedia Procopius From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search This article is about the historian and author of the Secret History. For other uses, see Procopius (disambiguation). Procopius of Caesarea Born c. AD 500 Caesarea, Palaestina Prima (Eastern Roman Empire) Died c. AD 570 Occupation Barrister and legal adviser Subject Secular history Notable works History of the Wars Buildings Secret History Procopius of Caesarea (Greek: Προκόπιος ὁ Καισαρεύς Prokópios ho Kaisareús; Latin: Procopius Caesariensis; c. 500 – c. after 565) was a prominent late antique Byzantine scholar from Palaestina Prima.[a] Accompanying the Byzantine general Belisarius in Emperor Justinian's wars, Procopius became the principal Byzantine historian of the 6th century, writing the History of the Wars, the Buildings, and the Secret History. He is commonly classified as the last major historian of the ancient Western world. Contents 1 Life 2 Writings 2.1 History of the Wars 2.2 Secret History 2.3 The Buildings 3 Style 4 Legacy 5 List of selected works 6 Notes 7 References 8 Further reading 9 External links 9.1 Texts of Procopius 9.2 Secondary material Life[edit] Apart from his own writings, the main source for Procopius's life was an entry in the Suda,[2] a Byzantine Greek encyclopaedia written sometime after 975, which discusses his early life. He was a native of Caesarea in the province of Palaestina Prima.[3] He would have received a conventional elite education in the Greek classics and rhetoric,[4] perhaps at the famous school at Gaza.[5] He may have attended law school, possibly at Berytus (present-day Beirut) or Constantinople (now Istanbul),[6][b] and became a lawyer (rhetor).[2] He evidently knew Latin, as was natural for a man with legal training.[c] In 527, the first year of the reign of the emperor Justinian I, he became the legal adviser (adsessor) for Belisarius, a general whom Justinian made his chief military commander in a great attempt to restore control over the lost western provinces of the empire.[d] Procopius was with Belisarius on the eastern front until the latter was defeated at the Battle of Callinicum in 531[10] and recalled to Constantinople.[11] Procopius witnessed the Nika riots of January, 532, which Belisarius and his fellow general Mundus repressed with a massacre in the Hippodrome.[12] In 533, he accompanied Belisarius on his victorious expedition against the Vandal kingdom in North Africa, took part in the capture of Carthage, and remained in Africa with Belisarius's successor Solomon the Eunuch when Belisarius returned east to the capital. Procopius recorded a few of the extreme weather events of 535–536, although these were presented as a backdrop to Byzantine military activities, such as a mutiny in and around Carthage.[13][e] He rejoined Belisarius for his campaign against the Ostrogothic kingdom in Italy and experienced the Gothic siege of Rome that lasted a year and nine days, ending in mid-March 538. He witnessed Belisarius's entry into the Gothic capital, Ravenna, in 540. Both the Wars[14] and the Secret History suggest that his relationship with Belisarius cooled thereafter. When Belisarius was sent back to Italy in 544 to cope with a renewal of the war with the Goths, now led by the able king Totila, Procopius appears to have no longer been on Belisarius's staff. As magister militum, Belisarius was an "illustrious man" (Latin: vir illustris; Greek: ἰλλούστριος, illoústrios); being his adsessor, Procopius must therefore have had at least the rank of a "visible man" (vir spectabilis). He thus belonged to the mid-ranking group of the senatorial order (ordo senatorius). However, the Suda, which is usually well informed in such matters, also describes Procopius himself as one of the illustres. Should this information be correct, Procopius would have had a seat in Constantinople's senate, which was restricted to the illustres under Justinian. He also wrote that under Justinian's reign in 560, a major Christian church dedicated the Virgin Mary was built on the site of the Temple Mount.[15] It is not certain when Procopius died. Many historians—including Howard-Johnson, Cameron, and Greatrex—date his death to 554, but there was an urban prefect of Constantinople (praefectus urbi Constantinopolitanae) called Procopius in 562. In that year, Belisarius was implicated in a conspiracy and was brought before this urban prefect. In fact, some scholars have argued that Procopius died at least a few years after 565 as he unequivocally states in the beginning of his Secret History that he planned to publish it after the death of Justinian for fear he would be tortured and killed by the emperor (or even by general Belisarius) if the emperor (or the general) learned about what Procopius wrote (his scathing criticism of the emperor, of his wife, of Belisarius, of the general's wife, Antonia: calling the former "demons in human form" and the latter incompetent and treacherous) in this later history. However, most scholars believe that the Secret History was written in 550 and remained unpublished during Procopius' lifetime. Writings[edit] Emperor Justinian The writings of Procopius are the primary source of information for the rule of the emperor Justinian I. Procopius was the author of a history in eight books on the wars prosecuted by Justinian, a panegyric on the emperor's public works projects throughout the empire, and a book known as the Secret History that claims to report the scandals that Procopius could not include in his officially sanctioned history for fear of angering the emperor, his wife, Belisarius, and the general's wife and had to wait until all of them were dead to avoid retaliation. History of the Wars[edit] Procopius's Wars or History of the Wars (Greek: Ὑπὲρ τῶν Πολέμων Λόγοι, Hypèr tōn Polémon Lógoi, "Words on the Wars"; Latin: De Bellis, "On the Wars") is his most important work, although less well known than the Secret History. The first seven books seem to have been largely completed by 545 and may have been published as a unit. They were, however, updated to mid-century before publication, with the latest mentioned event occurring in early 551. The eighth and final book brings the history to 553. The first two books—often known as The Persian War (Latin: De Bello Persico)—deal with the conflict between the Romans and Sassanid Persia in Mesopotamia, Syria, Armenia, Lazica, and Iberia (present-day Georgia).[f] It details the campaigns of the Sassanid shah Kavadh I, the 532 'Nika' revolt, the war by Kavadh's successor Khosrau I in 540, his destruction of Antioch and deportation of its inhabitants to Mesopotamia, and the great plague that devastated the empire from 542. The Persian War also covers the early career of Procopius's patron Belisarius in some detail. The Wars’ next two books—known as The Vandal War or Vandalic War (Latin: De Bello Vandalico)—cover Belisarius's successful campaign against the Vandal kingdom that had occupied Rome's provinces in northwest Africa for the last century. The final four books—known as The Gothic War (Latin: De Bello Gothico)—cover the Italian campaigns by Belisarius and others against the Ostrogoths. Procopius includes accounts of the 1st and 2nd sieges of Naples and the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd sieges of Rome. He also includes an account of the rise of the Franks (see Arborychoi). The last book describes the eunuch Narses's successful conclusion of the Italian campaign and includes some coverage of campaigns along the empire's eastern borders as well. The Wars proved influential on later Byzantine historiography.[17] In the 570s Agathias wrote Histories, a continuation of Procopius's work in a similar style. Secret History[edit] Belisarius may be this bearded figure on the right of Emperor Justinian I in the mosaic in the Church of San Vitale, Ravenna, which celebrates the reconquest of Italy by the Roman army under the skillful leadership of Belisarius. Procopius's now famous Anecdota also known as Secret History (Greek: Ἀπόκρυφη Ἱστορία, Apókryphe Historía; Latin: Historia Arcana) was discovered centuries later at the Vatican Library in Rome[18] and published in Lyon by Niccolò Alamanni in 1623. Its existence was already known from the Suda, which referred to it as Procopius's "unpublished works" containing "comedy" and "invective" of Justinian, Theodora, Belisarius and Antonina. The Secret History covers roughly the same years as the first seven books of The History of the Wars and appears to have been written after they were published. Current consensus generally dates it to 550, or less commonly, 558. In the eyes of many scholars, the Secret History reveals an author who had become deeply disillusioned with Emperor Justinian, his wife Theodora, the general Belisarius, and his wife Antonina. The work claims to expose the secret springs of their public actions, as well as the private lives of the emperor and his entourage. Justinian is portrayed as cruel, venal, prodigal, and incompetent. In one passage, it is even claimed that he was possessed by demonic spirits or was himself a demon: And some of those who have been with Justinian at the palace late at night, men who were pure of spirit, have thought they saw a strange demoniac form taking his place. One man said that the Emperor suddenly rose from his throne and walked about, and indeed he was never wont to remain sitting for long, and immediately Justinian's head vanished, while the rest of his body seemed to ebb and flow; whereat the beholder stood aghast and fearful, wondering if his eyes were deceiving him. But presently he perceived the vanished head filling out and joining the body again as strangely as it had left it.[19] Similarly, the Theodora of the Secret History is a garish portrait of vulgarity and insatiable lust juxtaposed with cold-blooded self-interest, shrewishness, and envious and fearful mean-spiritedness. Among the more titillating (and dubious) revelations in the Secret History is Procopius's account of Theodora's thespian accomplishments: Often, even in the theatre, in the sight of all the people, she removed her costume and stood nude in their midst, except for a girdle about the groin: not that she was abashed at revealing that, too, to the audience, but because there was a law against appearing altogether naked on the stage, without at least this much of a fig-leaf. Covered thus with a ribbon, she would sink down to the stage floor and recline on her back. Slaves to whom the duty was entrusted would then scatter grains of barley from above into the calyx of this passion flower, whence geese, trained for the purpose, would next pick the grains one by one with their bills and eat.[20] Furthermore, Secret History portrays Belisarius as a weak man completely emasculated by his wife, Antonina, who is portrayed in very similar terms to Theodora. They are both said to be former actresses and close friends. Procopius claimed Antonina worked as an agent for Theodora against Belisarius, and had an ongoing affair with Belisarius' godson, Theodosius. On the other hand, it has been argued that Procopius prepared the Secret History as an exaggerated document out of fear that a conspiracy might overthrow Justinian's regime, which—as a kind of court historian—might be reckoned to include him. The unpublished manuscript would then have been a kind of insurance, which could be offered to the new ruler as a way to avoid execution or exile after the coup. If this hypothesis were correct, the Secret History would not be proof that Procopius hated Justinian or Theodora.[21] The Buildings[edit] Triumphal arch at the entrance to the Sangarius Bridge The Buildings (Greek: Περὶ Κτισμάτων, Perì Ktismáton; Latin: De Aedificiis, "On Buildings") is a panegyric on Justinian's public works projects throughout the empire.[22] The first book may date to before the collapse of the first dome of Hagia Sophia in 557, but some scholars think that it is possible that the work postdates the building of the bridge over the Sangarius in the late 550s.[23] Historians consider Buildings to be an incomplete work due to evidence of the surviving version being a draft with two possible redactions.[22][24] Buildings was likely written at Justinian's behest, and it is doubtful that its sentiments expressed are sincere. It tells us nothing further about Belisarius, and it takes a sharply different attitude towards Justinian. He is presented as an idealised Christian emperor who built churches for the glory of God and defenses for the safety of his subjects. He is depicted showing particular concern for the water supply, building new aqueducts and restoring those that had fallen into disuse. Theodora, who was dead when this panegyric was written, is mentioned only briefly, but Procopius's praise of her beauty is fulsome. Due to the panegyrical nature of Procopius's Buildings, historians have discovered several discrepancies between claims made by Procopius and accounts in other primary sources. A prime example is Procopius's starting the reign of Justinian in 518, which was actually the start of the reign of his uncle and predecessor Justin I. By treating the uncle's reign as part of his nephew's, Procopius was able to credit Justinian with buildings erected or begun under Justin's administration. Such works include renovation of the walls of Edessa after its 525 flood and consecration of several churches in the region. Similarly, Procopius falsely credits Justinian for the extensive refortification of the cities of Tomis and Histria in Scythia Minor. This had actually been carried out under Anastasius I, who reigned before Justin.[25] Style[edit] Procopius belongs to the school of late antique historians who continued the traditions of the Second Sophistic. They wrote in Attic Greek; their models were Herodotus, Polybius and—particularly—Thucydides; and their subject matter was secular history. They avoided vocabulary unknown to Attic Greek and inserted an explanation when they had to use contemporary words. Thus Procopius includes glosses of monks ("the most temperate of Christians") and churches (as equivalent to a "temple" or "shrine"), since monasticism was unknown to the ancient Athenians and their ekklesía had been a popular assembly.[26] The secular historians eschewed the history of the Christian church; ecclesiastical history was left to a separate genre after Eusebius. However, Cameron has argued convincingly that Procopius's works reflect the tensions between the classical and Christian models of history in 6th-century Constantinople. This is supported by Whitby's analysis of Procopius's depiction of the capital and its cathedral in comparison to contemporary pagan panegyrics.[27] Procopius can be seen as depicting Justinian as essentially God's vicegerent, making the case for buildings being a primarily religious panegyric.[28] Procopius indicates that he planned to write an ecclesiastical history himself[29] and, if he had, he would probably have followed the rules of that genre. As far as known, however, such an ecclesiastical history was never written. Legacy[edit] A number of historical novels based on Procopius's works (along with other sources) have been written. Count Belisarius was written by poet and novelist Robert Graves in 1938. Procopius himself appears as a minor character in Felix Dahn's A Struggle for Rome and in L. Sprague de Camp's alternate history novel Lest Darkness Fall. The novel's main character, archaeologist Martin Padway, derives most of his knowledge of historical events from the Secret History.[30] The narrator in Herman Melville's novel Moby Dick cites Procopius's description of a captured sea monster as evidence of the narrative's feasibility.[31] List of selected works[edit] Procopii Caesariensis opera omnia. Edited by J. Haury; revised by G. Wirth. 3 vols. Leipzig: Teubner, 1962–64. Greek text. Procopius. Edited by H. B. Dewing. 7 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press and London, Hutchinson, 1914–40. Greek text and English translation. Procopius, The Secret History, translated by G. A. Williamson. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1966. A readable and accessible English translation of the Anecdota. Recently re-issued by Penguin (2007) with an updated and livelier translation by Peter Sarris, who has also provided a new commentary and notes. Prokopios, The Secret History, translated by Anthony Kaldellis. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 2010. This edition includes related texts, an introductory essay, notes, maps, a timeline, a guide to the main sources from the period and a guide to scholarship in English. The translator uses blunt and precise English prose in order to adhere to the style of the original text. Notes[edit] ^ "Like many Byzantine scholars, Procopius affected a remarkable traditional form of writing".[1] ^ For an alternative reading of Procopius as a trained engineer, see Howard-Johnson.[7] ^ Procopius uses and translates a number of Latin words in his Wars. Börm suggests a possible acquaintance with Vergil and Sallust.[8] ^ Procopius speaks of becoming Belisarius's advisor (symboulos) in that year.[9] ^ Before modern times, European and Mediterranean historians, as far as weather is concerned, typically recorded only the extreme or major weather events for a year or a multi-year period, preferring to focus on the human activities of policy makers and warriors instead. ^ Börm provides a detailed analysis.[16] References[edit] ^ "Procopius", John Moorhead, Encyclopedia of Historians and Historical Writing: M–Z, Vol. II, Kelly Boyd, (Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers, 1999), 962. ^ a b Suda pi.2479. See under 'Procopius' on Suda On Line. ^ Procopius, Wars of Justinian I.1.1; Suda pi.2479. See under 'Procopius' on Suda On Line. ^ Cameron, Averil: Procopius and the Sixth Century, London: Duckworth, 1985, p.7. ^ Evans, James A. S.: Procopius. New York: Twayne Publishers, 1972, p. 31. ^ Cameron, Procopius and the Sixth Century, p. 6. ^ Howard-Johnson, James: 'The Education and Expertise of Procopius'; in Antiquité Tardive 10 (2002), 19–30. ^ Börm, Henning (2007) Prokop und die Perser, p.46. Franz Steiner Verlag, Stuttgart. ISBN 978-3-515-09052-0 ^ Procopius, Wars, 1.12.24. ^ Wars, I.18.1-56 ^ Wars, I.21.2 ^ Wars, I.24.1-58 ^ 1. ^ Wars, VIII. ^ Dolphin, Lambert. "Visiting the Temple Mount". Temple Mount.org. Retrieved February 5, 2020. ^ Börm, Henning. Prokop und die Perser. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 2007. ^ Cresci, Lia Raffaella. "Procopio al confine tra due tradizioni storiografiche". Rivista di Filologia e di Istruzione Classica 129.1 (2001) 61–77. ^ https://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2011/01/03/110103fa_fact_mendelsohn ^ Procopius, Secret History 12.20–22, trans. Atwater. ^ Procopius Secret History 9.20–21, trans. Atwater. ^ Cf. Börm (2015). ^ a b Downey, Glanville: "The Composition of Procopius, De Aedificiis", in Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 78: pp. 171–183; abstract from JSTOR ^ Whitby, Michael: "Procopian Polemics: a review of A. Kaldellis Procopius of Caesarea. Tyranny, History, and Philosophy at the End of Antiquity", in The Classical Review 55 (2006), pp. 648– ^ Cameron, Averil. Procopius and the Sixth Century. London: Routledge, 1985. ^ Croke, Brian and James Crow: "Procopius and Dara", in The Journal of Roman Studies 73 (1983), 143–159. ^ Wars, 2.9.14 and 1.7.22. ^ Buildings, Book I. ^ Whitby, Mary: "Procopius' Buildings Book I: A Panegyrical Perspective", in Antiquité Tardive 8 (2000), 45–57. ^ Secret History, 26.18. ^ de Camp, L. Sprague (1949). Lest Darkness Fall. Ballantine Books. p. 111. ^ Melville, Herman (1851). Moby-Dick, or, the Whale. London: Harper & Brothers. doi:10.5962/bhl.title.62077. This article is based on an earlier version by James Allan Evans, originally posted at Nupedia. Further reading[edit] Adshead, Katherine: Procopius' Poliorcetica: continuities and discontinuities, in: G. Clarke et al. (eds.): Reading the past in late antiquity, Australian National UP, Rushcutters Bay 1990, pp. 93–119 Alonso-Núñez, J. M.: Jordanes and Procopius on Northern Europe, in: Nottingham Medieval Studies 31 (1987), 1–16. Amitay, Ory: Procopius of Caesarea and the Girgashite Diaspora, in: Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha 20 (2011), 257–276. Anagnostakis, Ilias: Procopius's dream before the campaign against Libya: a reading of Wars 3.12.1-5, in: C. Angelidi and G. Calofonos (eds.), Dreaming in Byzantium and Beyond, Farnham: Ashgate Publishing 2014, 79–94. Bachrach, Bernard S.: Procopius, Agathias and the Frankish Military, in: Speculum 45 (1970), 435–441. Bachrach, Bernard S.: Procopius and the chronology of Clovis's reign, in: Viator 1 (1970), 21–32. Baldwin, Barry: An Aphorism in Procopius, in: Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 125 (1982), 309–311. Baldwin, Barry: Sexual Rhetoric in Procopius, in: Mnemosyne 40 (1987), pp. 150–152 Belke, Klaus: Prokops De aedificiis, Buch V, zu Kleinasien, in: Antiquité Tardive 8 (2000), 115–125. Börm, Henning: Prokop und die Perser. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 2007. (Review in English by G. Greatrex and Review in English by A. Kaldellis) Börm, Henning: Procopius of Caesarea, in Encyclopaedia Iranica Online, New York 2013. Börm, Henning: Procopius, his predecessors, and the genesis of the Anecdota: Antimonarchic discourse in late antique historiography, in: H. Börm (ed.): Antimonarchic discourse in Antiquity. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag 2015, 305–346. Braund, David: Procopius on the Economy of Lazica, in: The Classical Quarterly 41 (1991), 221–225. Brodka, Dariusz: Die Geschichtsphilosophie in der spätantiken Historiographie. Studien zu Prokopios von Kaisareia, Agathias von Myrina und Theophylaktos Simokattes. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2004. Burn, A. R.: Procopius and the island of ghosts, in: English Historical Review 70 (1955), 258–261. Cameron, Averil: Procopius and the Sixth Century. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985. Cameron, Averil: The scepticism of Procopius, in: Historia 15 (1966), 466–482. Colvin, Ian: Reporting Battles and Understanding Campaigns in Procopius and Agathias: Classicising Historians' Use of Archived Documents as Sources, in: A. Sarantis (ed.): War and warfare in late antiquity. Current perspectives, Leiden: Brill 2013, 571–598. Cresci, Lia Raffaella: Procopio al confine tra due tradizioni storiografiche, in: Rivista di Filologia e di Istruzione Classica 129 (2001), 61–77. Cristini, Marco: Il seguito ostrogoto di Amalafrida: confutazione di Procopio, Bellum Vandalicum 1.8.12, in: Klio 99 (2017), 278–289. Croke, Brian and James Crow: Procopius and Dara, in: The Journal of Roman Studies 73 (1983), 143–159. Downey, Glanville: The Composition of Procopius, De Aedificiis, in: Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 78 (1947), 171–183. Evans, James A. S.: Justinian and the Historian Procopius, in: Greece & Rome 17 (1970), 218–223. Evans, James A. S.: Procopius. New York: Twayne Publishers, 1972. Gordon, C. D.: Procopius and Justinian's Financial Policies, in: Phoenix 13 (1959), 23–30. Greatrex, Geoffrey: Procopius and the Persian Wars, D. Phil. thesis, Oxford, 1994. Greatrex, Geoffrey: The dates of Procopius' works, in: BMGS 18 (1994), 101–114. Greatrex, Geoffrey: The Composition of Procopius' Persian Wars and John the Cappadocian, in: Prudentia 27 (1995), 1–13. Greatrex, Geoffrey: Rome and Persia at War, 502–532. London: Francis Cairns, 1998. Greatrex, Geoffrey: Recent work on Procopius and the composition of Wars VIII, in: BMGS 27 (2003), 45–67. Greatrex, Geoffrey: Perceptions of Procopius in Recent Scholarship, in: Histos 8 (2014), 76–121 and 121a–e (addenda). Howard-Johnson, James: The Education and Expertise of Procopius, in: Antiquité Tardive 10 (2002), 19–30 Kaegi, Walter: Procopius the military historian, in: Byzantinische Forschungen. 15, 1990, ISSN 0167-5346, 53–85 (online (PDF; 989 KB)). Kaldellis, Anthony: Classicism, Barbarism, and Warfare: Prokopios and the Conservative Reaction to Later Roman Military Policy, American Journal of Ancient History, n.s. 3-4 (2004-2005 [2007]), 189–218. Kaldellis, Anthony: Identifying Dissident Circles in Sixth-Century Byzantium: The Friendship of Prokopios and Ioannes Lydos, Florilegium, Vol. 21 (2004), 1-17. Kaldellis, Anthony: Procopius of Caesarea: Tyranny, History and Philosophy at the End of Antiquity. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004. Kaldellis, Anthony: Prokopios’ Persian War: A Thematic and Literary Analysis, in: R. Macrides, ed., History as Literature in Byzantium, Aldershot: Ashgate, 2010, 253–273. Kaldellis, Anthony: Prokopios’ Vandal War: Thematic Trajectories and Hidden Transcripts, in: S. T. Stevens & J. Conant, eds., North Africa under Byzantium and Early Islam, Washington, D.C: Dumbarton Oaks, 2016, 13–21. Kaldellis, Anthony: The Date and Structure of Prokopios’ Secret History and his Projected Work on Church History, in: Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies, Vol. 49 (2009), 585–616. Kruse, Marion: The Speech of the Armenians in Procopius: Justinian's Foreign Policy and the Transition between Books 1 and 2 of the Wars, in: The Classical Quarterly 63 (2013), 866–881. Kovács, Tamás: "Procopius's Sibyl - the fall of Vitigis and the Ostrogoths", Graeco-Latina Brunensia 24.2 (2019), 113–124. Lillington-Martin, Christopher, 2007–2017: 2007, "Archaeological and Ancient Literary Evidence for a Battle near Dara Gap, Turkey, AD 530: Topography, Texts and Trenches" in BAR –S1717, 2007 The Late Roman Army in the Near East from Diocletian to the Arab Conquest Proceedings of a colloquium held at Potenza, Acerenza and Matera, Italy edited by Ariel S. Lewin and Pietrina Pellegrini, pp. 299–311; 2009, "Procopius, Belisarius and the Goths" in Journal of the Oxford University History Society,(2009) Odd Alliances edited by Heather Ellis and Graciela Iglesias Rogers. ISSN 1742-917X, pages 1– 17, https://sites.google.com/site/jouhsinfo/issue7specialissueforinternetexplorer; 2011, "Secret Histories", http://classicsconfidential.co.uk/2011/11/19/secret-histories/; 2012, "Hard and Soft Power on the Eastern Frontier: a Roman Fortlet between Dara and Nisibis, Mesopotamia, Turkey: Prokopios’ Mindouos?" in The Byzantinist, edited by Douglas Whalin, Issue 2 (2012), pp. 4–5, http://oxfordbyzantinesociety.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/obsnews2012final.pdf; 2013, Procopius on the struggle for Dara and Rome, in A. Sarantis, N. Christie (eds.): War and Warfare in Late Antiquity: Current Perspectives (Late Antique Archaeology 8.1–8.2 2010–11), Leiden: Brill 2013, pp. 599–630, ISBN 978-90-04-25257-8; 2013 “La defensa de Roma por Belisario” in: Justiniano I el Grande (Desperta Ferro) edited by Alberto Pérez Rubio, no. 18 (July 2013), pages 40–45, ISSN 2171-9276; 2017, Procopius of Caesarea: Literary and Historical Interpretations (editor), Routledge (July 2017), www.routledge.com/9781472466044; 2017, "Introduction" and chapter 10, “Procopius, πάρεδρος / quaestor, Codex Justinianus, I.27 and Belisarius’ strategy in the Mediterranean” in Procopius of Caesarea: Literary and Historical Interpretations above. Maas, Michael Robert: Strabo and Procopius: Classical Geography for a Christian Empire, in H. Amirav et al. (eds.): From Rome to Constantinople. Studies in Honour of Averil Cameron, Leuven: Peeters, 2007, 67–84. Martindale, John: The Prosopography of the Later Roman Empire III, Cambridge 1992, 1060–1066. Meier, Mischa: Prokop, Agathias, die Pest und das ′Ende′ der antiken Historiographie, in Historische Zeitschrift 278 (2004), 281–310. Pazdernik, Charles F.: Xenophon’s Hellenica in Procopius’ Wars: Pharnabazus and Belisarius, in: Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 46 (2006) 175–206. Rance, Philip: Narses and the Battle of Taginae (552 AD): Procopius and Sixth-Century Warfare, in: Historia. Zeitschrift für alte Geschichte 30.4 (2005) 424–472. Rubin, Berthold: Prokopios, in Realencyclopädie der Classischen Altertumswissenschaft 23/1 (1957), 273–599. Earlier published (with index) as Prokopios von Kaisareia, Stuttgart: Druckenmüller, 1954. Stewart, Michael, Contests of Andreia in Procopius’ Gothic Wars, Παρεκβολαι 4 (2014), pp. 21–54. Stewart, Michael, The Andreios Eunuch-Commander Narses: Sign of a Decoupling of martial Virtues and Hegemonic Masculinity in the early Byzantine Empire?, Cerae 2 (2015), pp. 1–25. Stewart, Michael, Masculinity, Identity, and Power Politics in the Age of Justinian: A Study of Procopius, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2020:https://www.aup.nl/en/book/9789462988231/masculinity-identity-and-power-politics-in-the-age-of-justinian Treadgold, Warren: The Early Byzantine Historians, Basingstoke: Macmillan 2007, 176–226. The Secret History of Art by Noah Charney on the Vatican Library and Procopius. An article by art historian Noah Charney about the Vatican Library and its famous manuscript, Historia Arcana by Procopius. Whately, Conor, Battles and Generals: Combat, Culture, and Didacticism in Procopius' Wars. Leiden, 2016. Whitby, L. M. "Procopius and the Development of Roman Defences in Upper Mesopotamia", in P. Freeman and D. Kennedy (ed.), The Defence of the Roman and Byzantine East, Oxford, 1986, 717–35. External links[edit] Wikisource has original works written by or about: Procopius Texts of Procopius[edit] Complete Works, Greek text (Migne Patrologia Graeca) with analytical indexes The Secret History, English translation (Atwater, 1927) at the Internet Medieval Sourcebook The Secret History, English translation (Dewing, 1935) at LacusCurtius The Buildings, English translation (Dewing, 1935) at LacusCurtius The Buildings, Book IV Greek text with commentaries, index nominum, etc. at Sorin Olteanu's LTDM Project Works by Procopius at Project Gutenberg Works by or about Procopius at Internet Archive Procopius on LibriVox H. B. Dewing's Loeb edition of the works of Procopius: vols. I–VI at the Internet Archive (History of the Wars, Secret History) Palestine Pilgrims' Text Society (1888): Of the buildings of Justinian by Procopius, (ca 560 A.D) Complete Works 1, Greek ed. by K. W. Dindorf, Latin trans. by Claude Maltret in Corpus Scriptorum Historiae Byzantinae Pars II Vol. 1, 1833. (Persian Wars I–II, Vandal Wars I–II) Complete Works 2, Greek ed. by K. W. Dindorf, Latin trans. by Claude Maltret in Corpus Scriptorum Historiae Byzantinae Pars II Vol. 2, 1833. (Gothic Wars I–IV) Complete Works 3, Greek ed. by K. W. Dindorf, Latin trans. by Claude Maltret in Corpus Scriptorum Historiae Byzantinae Pars II Vol. 3, 1838. (Secret History, Buildings of Justinian) Secondary material[edit] Herbermann, Charles, ed. (1913). "Procopius of Caesarea" . Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. Entry for Procopius from the Suda. v t e Byzantine historians 5th century Annianus of Alexandria Eunapius John Rufus Malchus Olympiodorus of Thebes Panodorus of Alexandria Philostorgius Priscus Sabinus of Heraclea Socrates of Constantinople Sozomen Theodoret 6th century Agathias Cyril of Scythopolis Eustathius of Epiphania Evagrius Scholasticus Hesychius of Miletus John Diakrinomenos John of Ephesus John of Epiphania Pseudo-Joshua the Stylite Jordanes John Malalas Liberatus of Carthage Marcellinus Comes Menander Protector Nonnosus Peter the Patrician Procopius Theodorus Lector Theophanes of Byzantium Zacharias Rhetor Zosimus 7th century Chronicon Paschale John of Antioch Trajan the Patrician Theophylact Simocatta 8th century Hippolytus of Thebes 9th century Theophanes the Confessor George Syncellus Nikephoros I of Constantinople George Hamartolos Scriptor Incertus 10th century Chronicle of Monemvasia Constantine VII Joseph Genesius John Kaminiates Leo the Deacon Pseudo-Simeon Symeon the Metaphrast Theophanes Continuatus 11th century Michael Attaleiates George Kedrenos Michael Psellos John Skylitzes John Xiphilinus Yahya of Antioch 12th century Nikephoros Bryennios the Younger Niketas Choniates Eustathius of Thessalonica Michael Glykas Anna Komnene John Kinnamos Constantine Manasses Joannes Zonaras 13th century George Akropolites Theodore Skoutariotes 14th century Nicephorus Gregoras Nikephoros Kallistos Xanthopoulos John VI Kantakouzenos George Kodinos George Pachymeres Michael Panaretos 15th century John Anagnostes John Cananus Laonikos Chalkokondyles Michael Critobulus Doukas George Sphrantzes Authority control BIBSYS: 90741303 BNE: XX1380608 BNF: cb121468212 (data) CiNii: DA01455152 GND: 118741985 ICCU: IT\ICCU\CUBV\041039 ISNI: 0000 0003 8524 5527 LCCN: n50025184 LNB: 000185887 NDL: 001223646 NKC: kup19970000079796 NLG: 28166 NLI: 000107946 NSK: 000029578 NTA: 069343160 RERO: 02-A000133160 SELIBR: 196713 SNAC: w66d5zc7 SUDOC: 029951992 Trove: 1305632 VcBA: 495/37127 VIAF: 100172302 WorldCat Identities: viaf-89376420 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Procopius&oldid=996456163" Categories: 500 births 565 deaths 6th-century Byzantine people 6th-century Byzantine writers 6th-century historians Byzantine historians Historians of Justinian I Secret histories Sources on Germanic paganism Vandalic War People of the Roman–Sasanian Wars Hidden categories: Articles containing Ancient Greek (to 1453)-language text Articles containing Latin-language text Articles with Project Gutenberg links Articles with Internet Archive links Articles incorporating a citation from the 1913 Catholic Encyclopedia with Wikisource reference Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CINII identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ICCU identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with LNB identifiers Wikipedia articles with NDL identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLG identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLI identifiers Wikipedia articles with NSK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with RERO identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SNAC-ID identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with Trove identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikisource Languages العربية تۆرکجه Беларуская Български Bosanski Brezhoneg Català Чӑвашла Čeština Dansk Deutsch Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français Galego 한국어 Հայերեն Hrvatski Bahasa Indonesia Italiano עברית ქართული Latina Latviešu Magyar Македонски مصرى Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Norsk nynorsk Occitan Polski Português Română Русиньскый Русский Shqip Simple English Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Türkçe Українська 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 26 December 2020, at 18:46 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2803 ---- Lugdunum - Wikipedia Lugdunum From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Ancient Roman city on the site of modern Lyon, France This article is about the city in Gaul. For other uses, see Lugdunum (disambiguation). Lugdunum Colonia Copia Claudia Augusta Lugdunum Location within France Location Lyon, France Region Gallia Lugdunensis Coordinates 45°45′35″N 4°49′10″E / 45.75972°N 4.81944°E / 45.75972; 4.81944Coordinates: 45°45′35″N 4°49′10″E / 45.75972°N 4.81944°E / 45.75972; 4.81944 Type Roman city Area 200 hectares History Builder Lucius Munatius Plancus Founded 43 BC Periods Roman Republic to Roman Empire Colonia Copia Claudia Augusta Lugdunum (modern Lyon, France) was an important Roman city in Gaul, established on the current site of Lyon. The city was founded in 43 BC by Lucius Munatius Plancus. It served as the capital of the Roman province of Gallia Lugdunensis and was an important city in the western half of the Roman Empire for centuries. Two emperors, Claudius and Caracalla, were born in Lugdunum. In the period  AD 69–192 the city's population may have numbered 50,000 to 100,000, and possibly up to 200,000 inhabitants.[1][2][3][4] The original Roman city was situated west of the confluence of the Rhône and Saône, on the Fourvière heights. By the late centuries of the empire much of the population was located in the Saône River valley at the foot of Fourvière. Contents 1 Name 2 Pre-Roman settlements and the area before the founding of the city 3 Founding of the Roman city 4 Attention from the Emperors 5 Growth and prosperity in the first centuries of the Empire 6 Christianity and the first martyrs 7 Battle of Lugdunum 8 Decline of Lugdunum and the Empire 9 See also 10 References 11 Sources 12 External links Name[edit] The Roman city was founded as Colonia Copia Felix Munatia, a name invoking prosperity and the blessing of the gods. The city became increasingly referred to as Lugdunum (and occasionally Lugudunum[5]) by the end of the 1st century AD. During the Middle Ages, Lugdunum was transformed to Lyon by natural sound change. Lugdunum is a latinization of the Gaulish *Lugudunon, meaning "Fortress (or hill) of (the god) Lugus" or, alternately "Fortress of the champion" (if *lugus is a common noun cognate with Old Irish lug "warrior, hero, fighter"). The Celtic god Lugus was apparently popular in Ireland and Britain as is found in medieval Irish literature as Lug(h) and in medieval Welsh literature as Lleu (also spelled Llew). According to Pseudo-Plutarch, Lugdunum takes its name from an otherwise unattested Gaulish word lugos, that he says means "raven" (κόρακα), and the Gaulish word for an eminence or high ground (τόπον ἐξέχοντα), dunon.[6] An early interpretation of Gaulish Lugduno as meaning "Desired Mountain" is recorded in a gloss in the 9th-century Endlicher's Glossary,[7] but this may in fact reflect a native Frankish speaker's folk-etymological attempt at linking the first element of the name, Lugu- (which, by the time this gloss was composed, would have been pronounced lu'u, the -g- having become silent) with the similar-sounding Germanic word for "love", *luβ.[8] Another early medieval folk-etymology of the name, found in gloss on the Latin poet Juvenal, connects the element Lugu- to the Latin word for "light", lux (luci- in compounds) and translates the name as "Shining Hill" (lucidus mons).[9] Pre-Roman settlements and the area before the founding of the city[edit] Archeological evidence[10] shows Lugdunum was a pre-Gallic settlement as far back as the neolithic era, and a Gallic settlement with continuous occupation from the 4th century BC. It was situated on the Fourvière heights above the Saône river. There was trade with Campania for ceramics and wine, and use of some Italic-style home furnishings before the Roman conquest. Gaul was conquered for the Romans by Julius Caesar between 58 and 53 BC. His description, De Bello Gallico, is our principal written source of knowledge of pre-Roman Gaul, but there is no specific mention of this area. Founding of the Roman city[edit] In 44 BC, ten years after the conquest of Gaul, Julius Caesar was assassinated and civil war erupted. According to the historian Cassius Dio, in 43 BC, the Roman Senate ordered Munatius Plancus and Lepidus, governors of central and Transalpine Gaul respectively, to found a city for a group of Roman refugees who had been expelled from Vienne (a town about 30 km or 20 miles to the south) by the Allobroges and were encamped at the confluence of the Saône and Rhône rivers. Dio Cassius says this was to keep them from joining Mark Antony and bringing their armies into the developing conflict.[5] Epigraphic evidence suggests Munatius Plancus was the principal founder of Lugdunum.[citation needed] Lugdunum seems to have had a population of several thousand at the time Roman foundation. The citizens were administratively assigned to the Galerian tribe. The aqueduct of the Monts d'Or, completed around 20BC, was the first of at least four aqueducts supplying water to the city. Within 50 years Lugdunum increased greatly in size and importance, becoming the administrative centre of Roman Gaul and Germany. By the end of the reign of Augustus, Strabo described Lugdunum as the junction of four major roads (the Via Agrippa): south to Narbonensis, Massilia and Italy, north to the Rhine river and Germany, northwest to the sea (the English Channel), and west to Aquitania. Antoninianus struck under Florianus in Lugdunum mint. The proximity to the frontier with Germany made Lugdunum strategically important for the next four centuries, as a staging ground for further Roman expansion into Germany, as well as the "de facto" capital city and administrative centre of the Gallic provinces. Its large and cosmopolitan population made it the commercial and financial heart of the northwestern provinces as well. The imperial mint established a branch in 15 BC, during the reign of Augustus, and produced coinage for the next three centuries (see picture). Attention from the Emperors[edit] Ancient Theatre of Fourvière In its 1st century, Lugdunum was many times the object of attention or visits by the emperors or the imperial family. Agrippa, Drusus, Tiberius, and Germanicus (born himself in Lugdunum) were among the gubernatorial generals who served in Lugdunum. Augustus is thought to have visited at least three times between 16 and 8 BC. Drusus lived in Lugdunum between 13 and 9 BC. In 10 BC his son Claudius (the future emperor) was born there. Tiberius stopped in Lugdunum in 5–4 BC, on his way to the Rhine, and again in 21 AD, campaigning against the Andecavi. Caligula's visit in 39–40 was longer, stranger, and better documented by Suetonius. Claudius and Nero also contributed to the city's importance and growth. In 12 BC, Drusus completed an administrative census of the area and dedicated an altar to his stepfather Augustus at the junction of the two rivers. Perhaps to promote a policy of conciliation and integration, all the notable men of the three parts of Gaul were invited. Caius Julius Vercondaridubnus, a member of the Aedui tribe, was installed as the first priest of the new imperial cult sanctuary, which was subsequently known as the Junction Sanctuary or the Sanctuary of the Three Gauls. The altar, with its distinctive vertical end poles, was engraved with the names of 60 Gallic tribes, and was featured prominently on coins from the Lugdunum mint for many years. The "council of the three Gauls" continued to be held annually for nearly three centuries, even after Gaul was divided into provinces. Amphithéâtre des Trois-Gaules in Lyon Southeastern Gaul became increasingly Romanized. By 19 AD at least one temple, and the first amphitheater in Gaul (now known as the Amphithéâtre des Trois-Gaules) had been built on the slopes of the Croix-Rousse hill. In 48 AD, emperor Claudius asked the Senate to grant the notable men of the three Gauls the right to accede to the Senate. His request was granted and an engraved bronze plaque of the speech (the Claudian Tables) was erected in Lugdunum. Today, the pieces of the huge plaque are the pride of the Gallo-Roman Museum in Lyon. Suetonius reported Caligula's visit to Lugdunum in 39–40 AD at the beginning of his third consulate as characteristic of his reign. Spectacles were staged at the amphitheater to honor and entertain him and his guest, Ptolemy, king of Mauretania (whom Caligula later had murdered). A rhetoric contest was held in which the losers were required to expunge their work with their tongues. He auctioned furniture brought from the palace in Rome, assigning prices and purchasers. When Caligula wanted to get rid of Herod Antipas, King of Judaea, he sent him to exile in Lugdunum. Claudius was born in Lugdunum in 10 BC and lived there for at least two years. As emperor, he returned in 43 AD en route to his conquest of Britain and stopped again after its victorious conclusion in 47. A fountain honoring his victory has been uncovered. He continued to take a supportive interest in the town, making the notables of the town eligible to serve in the Roman Senate, as described above. During Claudius' reign, the city's strategic importance was enhanced by the bridging of the Rhône river. Its depth and swampy valley had been an obstacle to travel and communication to the east. The new route, termed the compendium, shortened the route south to Vienne and made the roads from Lugdunum to Italy and Germany more direct. By the end of his reign, the city's official name had become Colonia Copia Claudia Augusta Lugudunenisium, abbreviated CCC AVG LVG. Nero also took an interest in the city. Citizens of Lugdunum contributed four million sesterces to the recovery after the Great Fire of Rome in 64 AD. In reciprocal appreciation, Nero contributed the same amount to the rebuilding of Lugdunum after a similarly devastating fire a few years later. Although the destructiveness of the fire is described in a letter from Seneca to Lucilius,[11] archeologists have not been able to uncover a confirmatory layer of ash. The Lyonnais admiration of Nero was not universally shared; tyranny, extravagance, and negligence fostered resentment, and coups were planned. In March 68 AD, a Romanized Aquitainian named Caius Julius Vindex, who was governor of Gallia Lugdunensis led an uprising intended to replace Nero with Galba, a Roman governor of Spain. The citizens of Vienne, however, responded more enthusiastically than the Lyonnais, most of whom remained loyal to Nero. A small force from Vienne briefly besieged Lugdunum, but withdrew when Vindex was defeated by the Rhine legions a few weeks later at Vesontio. Despite the defeat of Vindex, rebellion grew. Nero committed suicide in June and Galba was proclaimed emperor. The loyalty of Lugdunum to Nero was not appreciated by his successor, Galba, who punished some of Nero's supporters by confiscations of property. In another turnabout for Lugdunum, Galba's policies were immediately unpopular, and in January, 69 AD, the Rhine legions quickly threw their support to Vitellius as emperor. They arrived at friendly Lugdunum, where they were persuaded by the Lyonnais to punish nearby Vienne. Vienne quickly laid down weapons and paid a "ransom" to forestall plundering. Meanwhile, Vitellius arrived in Lugdunum, where, according to Tacitus, he formally declared himself Imperator, punished unreliable soldiers, and celebrated with feasts, and with games in the amphitheater. Fortunately for Lugdunum, the would-be emperor and his army hurried into Italy, defeated Otho, and was in turn defeated by Vespasian and the army of the East, bringing the chaos of the Year of the Four Emperors to an end. Despite a lack of imperial visits for most of the next century, Lugdunum prospered, until Septimius Severus and the Battle of Lugdunum (see below) brought devastation in 197 AD. Growth and prosperity in the first centuries of the Empire[edit] Aqueduct of the Gier In the 2nd century, Lugdunum prospered and grew to a population of 40,000 to 200,000 persons.[12] Four aqueducts brought water to the city's fountains, public baths, and wealthy homes. The aqueducts were well engineered and included several siphons. This article may be expanded with text translated from the corresponding article in French. (June 2016) Click [show] for important translation instructions. View a machine-translated version of the French article. Machine translation like DeepL or Google Translate is a useful starting point for translations, but translators must revise errors as necessary and confirm that the translation is accurate, rather than simply copy-pasting machine-translated text into the English Wikipedia. Do not translate text that appears unreliable or low-quality. If possible, verify the text with references provided in the foreign-language article. You must provide copyright attribution in the edit summary accompanying your translation by providing an interlanguage link to the source of your translation. A model attribution edit summary Content in this edit is translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Aqueducs antiques de Lyon]]; see its history for attribution. You should also add the template {{Translated|fr|Aqueducs antiques de Lyon}} to the talk page. For more guidance, see Wikipedia:Translation. It continued to be a provincial capital with additional government functions and services such as the mint and customs service. Lugdunum had at least two banks and became the principal manufacturing center for pottery, metal working, and weaving in Gaul. Lyonnais terra cotta, pottery and wine were traded throughout Gaul, and many other items were crafted for export. The city itself was run by a "senate" of decurions (the ordo decurionum) and a hierarchy of magistrates: quaestors, aediles, and duumvirs. The social classes of the time consisted of the decurions at the top, who could aspire to Senate status, followed by the knights (equites), and the Augustales, six of whom were in charge of the municipal imperial cult. This latter status was the highest distinction to which a wealthy freedman could aspire. Many of the wealthy merchants and craftsmen were freedmen. Below them were the workmen and slaves. The Rhône and Saône rivers were navigable, as were most of the rivers of Gaul, and river traffic was heavy. The Lyonnais company of boatmen (nautae) was the largest and "most honored" in Gaul. Archeological evidence suggests the right bank of the Saône had the largest concentration of wharves, quays and warehouses. Lyonnais boatmen dominated the wine trade from Narbonensis and Italy, as well as oil from Spain, to the rest of Gaul. The heavy concentration of trade made Lugdunum one of the most cosmopolitan cities of Gaul, and inscriptions attest to a large foreign-born population, especially Italians, Greeks, and immigrants from the oriental provinces of Asia Minor and Syria-Palestine. There is evidence of numerous temples and shrines in Lugdunum. Traditional Gallic gods like mallet-bearing Sucellus and the mother goddesses called the Matres (depicted with cornucopiae) continued to be worshiped somewhat syncretistically along with the Roman gods. Additional religious cults came with the oriental immigrants, who brought the eastern mystery religions to the Rhône valley. A major shrine of the Phrygian goddess Cybele was built in nearby Vienne, and she also seems to have found special favor in Lugdunum in the late 1st century and 2nd century. Christianity and the first martyrs[edit] The cosmopolitan hospitality to eastern religions may have allowed the first attested Christian community in Gaul to be established in Lugdunum in the 2nd century, led by a bishop Pothinus—who probably was Greek. In 177 it also became the first in Gaul to suffer persecution and martyrdom. The event was described in a letter from the Christians in Lugdunum to counterparts in Asia, later retrieved and preserved by Eusebius. There is no record of a cause or a triggering event but mob violence against the Christians in the streets culminated in a public interrogation in the forum by the tribune and town magistrates. The Christians publicly confessed their faith and were imprisoned until the arrival of Legate of Lugdonensis, who gave his authority to the persecution. About 40 of the Christians were martyred—dying in prison, beheaded, or killed by beasts in the arena as a public spectacle. Among the latter were Bishop Pothinus, Blandina, Doctor Attalus, Ponticus, and the deacon Sanctus of Vienne. Their ashes were thrown into the Rhône. Nevertheless, the Christian community either survived or was reconstituted, and under Bishop Irenaeus it continued to grow in size and influence. Battle of Lugdunum[edit] Main article: Battle of Lugdunum The 2nd century ended with another struggle for imperial succession. The emperor Pertinax was murdered in 193, and four generals again "contended for the purple". Two of the rivals, Clodius Albinus and Septimius Severus, initially formed a political alliance. Albinus was a former legate of Britannia and commanded legions in Britain and Gaul. Septimius Severus commanded the Pannonian legions, and led them successfully against Didius Julianus near Rome in 193, and defeated Pescennius Niger in 194. Severus consolidated his power in Rome and broke his alliance with Albinus. The Senate supported Severus and declared Albinus a public enemy. Clodius Albinus had settled with his army near Lugdunum early in 195. There, he had himself proclaimed Augustus and made plans to counter Severus. Under his control, the Lugdunum mint issued coins celebrating his "clemency", as well as one dedicated to the "Genius of Lugdunum." He was joined by an army under Lucius Novius Rufus, the governor of Hispania Tarraconensis. They successfully attacked the German troops of Virius Lupus but were unable to deter them from supporting Severus. Severus brought his army from Italy and Germany toward the end of 196. The armies fought an initial, inconclusive engagement at Tinurtium (Tournus), about 60 km (35 miles) up the Saône from Lugdunum. Albinus retreated with his forces toward Lugdunum. On the 19th of February, 197, Severus again attacked Clodius Albinus to the northwest of the city. Albinus' army was defeated in the bloody and decisive Battle of Lugdunum. Dio Cassius described 300,000 men involved in the battle: although this was one of the largest battles involving Roman armies known, this number is assumed to be an exaggeration. Albinus committed suicide in a house near the Rhône; his head was sent to Rome as a warning to his supporters. His defeated cohorts were dissolved and the victorious legions punished those in Lugdunum who had supported Albinus, by confiscation, banishment, or execution. The city was plundered or at least severely damaged by the battle. Legio I Minervia remained camped in Lugdunum from 198 to 211. Decline of Lugdunum and the Empire[edit] Historical and archeological evidence indicates that Lugdunum never fully recovered from the devastation of this battle. A major reorganization of imperial administration begun at the end of the 3rd century during the reign of Diocletian and completed a few decades later by Constantine further reduced the importance of Lugdunum. This reorganization standardized size and status of provinces, splitting many of the larger. The new provinces were grouped in larger administrative districts. Lugdunum became the capital of a much smaller region containing only two cities besides Lugdunum: Autun and Langres. The new governor bore the title of consularis. The mint was retained at Lugdunum, as was an administrative tax office and a state-run wool clothing factory. Lugdunum was no longer the chief city and administrative capital of Gaul. Although the city continued, there seems to have been a population shift from the Fourviere heights where the original Roman city was situated to the river valley below. Other evidence suggests other cities surpassed Lugdunum as trading centers. Though the Western Empire persisted another century and a half, the border regions extending along the Rhine River in Germany to the Danube River in Dacia became far more important from a military and strategic standpoint. Cities like Augusta Treverorum (Trier) eclipsed Lugdunum in importance. The status of the western provinces declined further when Constantine made Byzantium (later named Constantinople after his death) the capital of the Eastern part of the Empire. As the Western Empire disintegrated in the 5th century, Lugdunum became the principal city of the Burgundian kingdom. See also[edit] History of Lyon Abascantus References[edit] ^ Travel Lyon, France: Illustrated Guide, Phrasebook & Maps, p. 9, at Google Books. ^ The Roman Remains of Northern and Eastern France: A Guidebook, p. 388, at Google Books. ^ Roman Cities, p. 176, at Google Books. ^ Roman Cities, p. 335, at Google Books. ^ a b Cassius Dio, Roman History, 46.50.4. ^ Delattre, Charles (ed.), Pseudo-Plutarque. De fluviorum et montium nominibus et de iis quae in illis inveniuntur, Presses Univ. Septentrion, 2011, pp. 109–111 (in Latin). ^ Lugduno desiderato monte: dunum enim montem Lugduno: "desired mountain"; because dunum is mountain" in Endlicher Glossary. ^ Toorians, Lauran, "Endlicher’s Glossary, an attempt to write its history", in: García Alonso (Juan Luis) (ed.), Celtic and other languages in ancient Europe (2008), pp. 153–184. ^ "Lugdunum est civitas Gallie quasi lucidum dunam, id est lucidus mons, dunam enim in Greco mons." in Andreas Hofeneder, Die Religion der Kelten in den antiken literarischen Zeugnissen: Sammlung, Übersetzung und Kommentierung, Volume 2, Austrian Academy of Sciences Press, 2008, pp. 571–572 (in German). ^ Mathieu Poux, Hugues Savay-Guerraz, Lyon avant Lugdunum, Infolio éditions, 2003, p. 151 (in French), ISBN 2-88474-106-2. ^ Epistulae ad Lucilium, 91. ^ L'Express. No. 3074 (in French). Sources[edit] Cassius Dio. Roman History. XLVI, 50. André Pelletier. Histoire de Lyon: de la capitale les Gaules à la métropole européene. Editions Lyonnaises d'Art et d'Histoire. Lyon: 2004. ISBN 2-84147-150-0 Seneca. Apocolocyntosis. VII. External links[edit] Media related to Lugdunum at Wikimedia Commons v t e Colonies of Ancient Rome With correspondence to modern geography Europe Britannia Superior Camulodunum Lindum Colonia Londinium Britannia Inferior Eboracum Roman Dacia Ulpia Traiana Sarmizegetusa Gallia Lugdunensis Lugdunum Gallia Narbonensis Narbo Martius Germania Inferior Colonia Claudia Ara Agrippinensium Mogontiacum Hispania Emerita Augusta Italia Aelia Augusta Aeclanum Castra Taurinorum Florentia Mediolanum Placentia Moesia Singidunum Levant Of legion veterans Berytus Caesarea Maritima 2 Aelia Capitolina 1 3 Ptolemais 1 Of late Empire Laodicea Antioch Seleucia Emesa Heliopolis 1 Palmyra 1 3 Damascus 1 3 Arca Caesarea Sidon Tyrus 1 Sebaste Bostra 1 3 Petra 1 Neapolis Philippopolis Dura-Europos 2 Possible colonies Gaza Ascalon Gerasa Gadara Emmaus Nicopolis Neronias Locations with modern names Israel and the Palestinian territories Jerusalem: Aelia Capitolina Acre: Ptolemais Caesarea: Caesarea Maritima Imwas: Emmaus Nicopolis Banias: Neronias Jordan Petra: Petra Umm Qais: Gadara Jerash: Gerasa Lebanon Arqa: Arca Caesarea Beirut: Berytus Baalbek: Heliopolis Saida: Sidon Tyre: Tyrus Syria Bosra: Bostra Damascus: Damascus Dura-Europos: Dura-Europus Homs: Emesa Latakia: Laodicea Shahba: Philippopolis Tadmur: Palmyra Turkey Antakya: Antioch Samandağ: Seleucia 1 UNESCO World Heritage Sites; 2 Proposed; 3 in Danger See also: Legacy of the Roman Empire v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lugdunum&oldid=996125880" Categories: History of Lyon Archaeological sites in France Roman Lyon 40s BC establishments 43 BC Roman fortifications in Gallia Lugdunensis Roman towns and cities in France Hidden categories: Articles with Latin-language sources (la) Articles with German-language sources (de) Articles with French-language sources (fr) Articles with short description Short description matches Wikidata Coordinates on Wikidata All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from December 2017 Articles to be expanded from June 2016 All articles to be expanded Articles needing translation from French Wikipedia Commons category link from Wikidata Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Languages Български Brezhoneg Català Čeština Ελληνικά Español Euskara فارسی Français Gaeilge Hrvatski Bahasa Indonesia Italiano Magyar Nederlands Norsk bokmål Occitan Polski Português Română Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Svenska Türkçe 吴语 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 24 December 2020, at 17:57 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2806 ---- Classical Latin - Wikipedia Classical Latin From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Standard form of the Latin language in the Roman Republic and Empire This article is about written Classical Latin. For spoken language, see Latin. Classical Latin LINGVA LATINA, lingua latīna Latin inscription in the Colosseum Pronunciation [laˈtiːnɪtaːs] Native to Roman Republic, Roman Empire Region Mare Nostrum region Era 75 BC to AD 3rd century, when it developed into Late Latin Language family Indo-European Italic Latino-Faliscan Latin Classical Latin Early form Old Latin Writing system Classical Latin alphabet  Official status Official language in Roman Republic, Roman Empire Regulated by Schools of grammar and rhetoric Language codes ISO 639-3 – Linguist List lat-cla Glottolog None Linguasphere 51-AAB-aaa The range of Latin, AD 60 Classical Latin is the form of Latin language recognized as a standard by writers of the late Roman Republic and early Roman Empire. It was used from 75 BC-3rd century AD when it developed into Late Latin. In some later periods, it was regarded as good or proper Latin, with following versions viewed as debased, degenerate, vulgar, or corrupted. The word Latin is now understood by default to mean "Classical Latin"; for example, modern Latin textbooks almost exclusively teach Classical Latin. Cicero and his contemporaries of the late republic used lingua latina and sermo latinus versions of the Latin language. Conversely, the Greeks used Vulgar Latin (sermo vulgaris and sermo vulgi) in their vernacular, written as latinitas,[note 1] or "Latinity" (which implies "good") when combined. It was also called sermo familiaris ("speech of the good families"), sermo urbanus ("speech of the city"), and in rare cases sermo nobilis ("noble speech"). Besides latinitas, it was mainly called latine (adverb for "in good Latin"), or latinius (comparative adverb for "in better Latin"). Latinitas was spoken and written. It was the language taught in schools. Prescriptive rules therefore applied to it, and when special subjects like poetry or rhetoric were taken into consideration, additional rules applied. Since spoken Latinitas has become extinct (in favor of subsequent registers), the rules of politus (polished) texts may give the appearance of an artificial language. However, Latinitas was a form of sermo (spoken language), and as such, retains spontaneity. No texts by Classical Latin authors are noted for the type of rigidity evidenced by stylized art, with the exception of repetitious abbreviations and stock phrases found on inscriptions. The best known example, "IESVS NAZARENVS REX IVDAEORVM" ("Jesus Nazarenus Rex Judaeorum", "Jesus The Nasarean - The King Of The Judeans") was the titulus written on the placard above Jesus' head on the Cross, is possibly the most famous example of Classical Latin. Contents 1 Philological constructs 1.1 Classical 1.2 Canonical 1.3 Ages of Latin 2 Authors of the Golden Age 2.1 Republican 2.2 Augustan 3 Authors of the Silver Age 3.1 From the Ides of March to Trajan 3.2 Through the death of Marcus Aurelius, 180 AD 4 Stylistic shifts 5 See also 6 Notes 7 References 7.1 Citations 7.2 General sources 8 Further reading 9 External links Philological constructs[edit] Classical[edit] "Good Latin" in philology is known as "classical" Latin literature. The term refers to the canonical relevance of literary works written in Latin in the late Roman Republic, and early to middle Roman Empire. "[T]hat is to say, that of belonging to an exclusive group of authors (or works) that were considered to be emblematic of a certain genre."[1] The term classicus (masculine plural classici) was devised by the Romans to translate Greek ἐγκριθέντες (encrithentes), and "select" which refers to authors who wrote in a form of Greek that was considered model. Before then, the term classis, in addition to being a naval fleet, was a social class in one of the diachronic divisions of Roman society in accordance with property ownership under the Roman constitution.[2] The word is a transliteration of Greek κλῆσις (clēsis, or "calling") used to rank army draftees by property from first to fifth class. Classicus refers to those in the primae classis ("first class"), such as the authors of polished works of Latinitas, or sermo urbanus. It contains nuances of the certified and the authentic, or testis classicus ("reliable witness"). It was under this construct that Marcus Cornelius Fronto (an African-Roman lawyer and language teacher) used scriptores classici ("first-class" or "reliable authors") in the second century AD. Their works were be viewed as models of good Latin.[3] This is the first known reference (possibly innovated during this time) to Classical Latin applied by authors, evidenced in the authentic language of their works.[4] Canonical[edit] David Ruhnken Imitating Greek grammarians, Romans such as Quintilian drew up lists termed indices or ordines modeled after the ones created by the Greeks, which were called pinakes. The Greek lists were considered classical, or recepti scriptores ("select writers"). Aulus Gellius includes authors like Plautus, who are considered writers of Old Latin and not strictly in the period of classical Latin. The classical Romans distinguished Old Latin as prisca Latinitas and not sermo vulgaris. Each author's work in the Roman lists was considered equivalent to one in the Greek. In example, Ennius was the Latin Homer, Aeneid was the equivalent of Iliad, etc. The lists of classical authors were as far as the Roman grammarians went in developing a philology. The topic remained at that point while interest in the classici scriptores declined in the medieval period as the best form of the language yielded to medieval Latin, inferior to classical standards. The Renaissance saw a revival in Roman culture, and with it, the return of Classic ("the best") Latin. Thomas Sébillet's Art Poétique (1548), "les bons et classiques poètes françois", refers to Jean de Meun and Alain Chartier, who the first modern application of the words.[citation needed] According to Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, the term classical (from classicus) entered modern English in 1599, some 50 years after its re-introduction to the continent. In Governor William Bradford's Dialogue (1648), he referred to synods of a separatist church as "classical meetings", defined by meetings between "young men" from New England and "ancient men" from Holland and England.[5] In 1715, Laurence Echard's Classical Geographical Dictionary was published.[6] In 1736, Robert Ainsworth's Thesaurus Linguae Latinae Compendarius turned English words and expressions into "proper and classical Latin."[7] In 1768, David Ruhnken's Critical History of the Greek Orators recast the molded view of the classical by applying the word "canon" to the pinakes of orators after the Biblical canon, or list of authentic books of the Bible. In doing so, Ruhnken had secular catechism in mind.[8] Ages of Latin[edit] Wilhelm Sigismund Teuffel In 1870, Wilhelm Sigismund Teuffel's Geschichte der Römischen Literatur (A History of Roman Literature) defined the philological notion of classical Latin based on the metaphoric uses of the ancient myth, Ages of Man. It was viewed as a universal standard, marking the Golden and Silver Ages of classical Latin. Shortly after Wilhem Wagner published Teuffel's work in German, he translated it to English (1873). Teuffel's classification divides the chronology of classical Latin authors into several periods according to political events rather than by style. His work (with modifications) is still in use today. Teuffel went on to publish other editions, but the English translation of A History of Roman Literature gained immediate success. In 1877, Charles Thomas Cruttwell produced a similar work in English. In his preface, Cruttwell notes, "Teuffel's admirable history, without which many chapters in the present work could not have attained completeness." He also credits Wagner. Cruttwell adopts the time periods found in Teuffel's work, but he presents a detailed analysis of style, whereas Teuffel was more concerned with history. Like Teuffel, Cruttwell encountered issues while attempting to condense the voluminous details of time periods in an effort to capture the meaning of phases found in their various writing styles. Like Teuffel, he has trouble finding a name for the first of the three periods (the current Old Latin phase), calling it "from Livius to Sulla." He says the language "is marked by immaturity of art and language, by a vigorous but ill-disciplined imitation of Greek poetical models, and in prose by a dry sententiousness of style, gradually giving way to a clear and fluent strength..." These abstracts have little meaning to those not well-versed in Latin literature. In fact, Cruttwell admits "The ancients, indeed, saw a difference between Ennius, Pacuvius, and Accius, but it may be questioned whether the advance would be perceptible by us." In time, some of Cruttwell's ideas become established in Latin philology. While praising the application of rules to classical Latin (most intensely in the Golden Age, he says "In gaining accuracy, however, classical Latin suffered a grievous loss. It became cultivated as distinct from a natural language... Spontaneity, therefore, became impossible and soon invention also ceased... In a certain sense, therefore, Latin was studied as a dead language, while it was still a living."[9] Also problematic in Teuffel's scheme is its appropriateness to the concept of classical Latin. Cruttwell addresses the issue by altering the concept of the classical. The "best" Latin is defined as "golden" Latin, the second of the three periods. The other two periods (considered "classical") are left hanging. By assigning the term "pre-classical" to Old Latin and implicating it to post-classical (or post-Augustan) and silver Latin, Cruttwell realized that his construct was not accordance with ancient usage and assertions: "[T]he epithet classical is by many restricted to the authors who wrote in it [golden Latin]. It is best, however, not to narrow unnecessarily the sphere of classicity; to exclude Terence on the one hand or Tacitus and Pliny on the other, would savour of artificial restriction rather than that of a natural classification." The contradiction remains—Terence is, and is not a classical author, depending on context.[10] Authors of the Golden Age[edit] At Maecenas' Reception, oil, Stepan Bakalovich, 1890. An artist's view of the classical. Maecenas knew and entertained everyone literary in the Golden Age, especially Augustus. Teuffel's definition of the "First Period" of Latin was based on inscriptions, fragments, and the literary works of the earliest known authors. Though he does use the term "Old Roman" at one point, most of these findings remain unnamed. Teuffel presents the Second Period in his major work, das goldene Zeitalter der römischen Literatur (Golden Age of Roman Literature), dated 671–767 AUC (83 BC – 14 AD), according to his own recollection. The timeframe is marked by the dictatorship of Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix and the death of the emperor Augustus.[11][12] Wagner's translation of Teuffel's writing is as follows: The golden age of the Roman literature is that period in which the climax was reached in the perfection of form, and in most respects also in the methodical treatment of the subject-matters. It may be subdivided between the generations, in the first of which (the Ciceronian Age) prose culminated, while poetry was principally developed in the Augustan Age. The Ciceronian Age was dated 671–711 AUC (83–43 BC), ending just after the death of Marcus Tullius Cicero. The Augustan 711–67 AUC (43 BC – 14 AD) ends with the death of Augustus. The Ciceronian Age is further divided by the consulship of Cicero in 691 AUC (63 BC) into a first and second half. Authors are assigned to these periods by years of principal achievements. The Golden Age had already made an appearance in German philology, but in a less-systematic way. In a translation of Bielfeld's Elements of universal erudition (1770): The Second Age of Latin began about the time of Caesar [his ages are different from Teuffel's], and ended with Tiberius. This is what is called the Augustan Age, which was perhaps of all others the most brilliant, a period at which it should seem as if the greatest men, and the immortal authors, had met together upon the earth, in order to write the Latin language in its utmost purity and perfection...[13] and of Tacitus, his conceits and sententious style is not that of the golden age...[14] Evidently, Teuffel received ideas about golden and silver Latin from an existing tradition and embedded them in a new system, transforming them as he thought best. In Cruttwell's introduction, the Golden Age is dated 80 BC – 14 AD (from Cicero to Ovid), which corresponds to Teuffel's findings. Of the "Second Period," Cruttwell paraphrases Teuffel by saying it "represents the highest excellence in prose and poetry." The Ciceronian Age (known today as the "Republican Period") is dated 80–42 BC, marked by the Battle of Philippi. Cruttwell omits the first half of Teuffel's Ciceronian, and starts the Golden Age at Cicero's consulship in 63 BC—an error perpetuated in Cruttwell's second edition. He likely meant 80 BC, as he includes Varro in Golden Latin. Teuffel's Augustan Age is Cruttwell's Augustan Epoch (42 BC – 14 AD). Republican[edit] Marcus Tullius Cicero, after whom Teuffel named his Ciceronian period of the Golden Age Julius Caesar The literary histories list includes all authors from Canonical to the Ciceronian Age—even those whose works are fragmented or missing altogether. With the exception of a few major writers, such as Cicero, Caesar, Virgil and Catullus, ancient accounts of Republican literature praise jurists and orators whose writings, and analyses of various styles of language cannot be verified because there are no surviving records. The reputations of Aquilius Gallus, Quintus Hortensius Hortalus, Lucius Licinius Lucullus, and many others who gained notoriety without readable works, are presumed by their association within the Golden Age. A list of canonical authors of the period whose works survived in whole or in part is shown here: Marcus Terentius Varro (116–27 BC), highly influential grammarian Titus Pomponius Atticus (112/109 – 35/32), publisher and correspondent of Cicero Marcus Tullius Cicero (106–43 BC), orator, philosopher, essayist, whose works define golden Latin prose and are used in Latin curricula beyond the elementary level Servius Sulpicius Rufus (106–43 BC), jurist, poet Decimus Laberius (105–43 BC), writer of mimes Marcus Furius Bibaculus (1st century BC), writer of ludicra Gaius Julius Caesar (103–44 BC), general, statesman, historian Gaius Oppius (1st century BC), secretary to Julius Caesar, probable author under Caesar's name Gaius Matius (1st century BC), public figure, correspondent with Cicero Cornelius Nepos (100–24 BC), biographer Publilius Syrus (1st century BC), writer of mimes and maxims Quintus Cornificius (1st century BC), public figure and writer on rhetoric Titus Lucretius Carus (Lucretius; 94–50 BC), poet, philosopher Publius Nigidius Figulus (98–45 BC), public officer, grammarian Aulus Hirtius (90–43 BC), public officer, military historian Gaius Helvius Cinna (1st century BC), poet Marcus Caelius Rufus (87–48 BC), orator, correspondent with Cicero Gaius Sallustius Crispus (86–34 BC), historian Marcus Porcius Cato Uticensis (Cato the Younger; 95–46 BC), orator Publius Valerius Cato (1st century BC), poet, grammarian Gaius Valerius Catullus (Catullus; 84–54 BC), poet Gaius Licinius Macer Calvus (82–47 BC), orator, poet Augustan[edit] Main article: Augustan literature (ancient Rome) The Golden Age is divided by the assassination of Julius Caesar. In the wars that followed, a generation of Republican literary figures were lost. Marcus Tullius Cicero was beheaded in the streets as he inquired among his litter about a disturbance.[citation needed] Cicero and his contemporaries were replaced by a new generation who spent their formidable years under the old constructs, and forced to make their mark under the watchful eye of a new emperor. The demand for great orators had ceased,[15] shifting to an emphasis on poetry. Other than the historian Livy, the most remarkable writers of the period were the poets Virgil, Horace, and Ovid. Although Augustus evidenced some toleration to republican sympathizers, he exiled Ovid, and imperial tolerance ended with the continuance of the Julio-Claudian dynasty. Augustan writers include: Publius Vergilius Maro (Virgil, spelled also as Vergil; 70–19 BC), Quintus Horatius Flaccus (Horace; 65–8 BC), known for lyric poetry and satires Sextus Aurelius Propertius (50–15 BC), poet Albius Tibullus (54–19 BC), elegiac poet Publius Ovidius Naso (Ovid; 43 BC – AD 18), poet Titus Livius (Livy; 64 BC – AD 12), historian Grattius Faliscus (a contemporary of Ovid), poet Marcus Manilius (1st century BC and AD), astrologer, poet Gaius Julius Hyginus (64 BC – AD 17), librarian, poet, mythographer Marcus Verrius Flaccus (55 BC – AD 20), grammarian, philologist, calendarist Marcus Vitruvius Pollio (80-70 BC — after 15 BC), engineer, architect Marcus Antistius Labeo (d. AD 10 or 11), jurist, philologist Lucius Cestius Pius (1st century BC & AD), Latin educator Gnaeus Pompeius Trogus (1st century BC), historian, naturalist Marcus Porcius Latro (1st century BC), rhetorician Gaius Valgius Rufus (consul 12 BC), poet Authors of the Silver Age[edit] The frowning second emperor, Tiberius, limited free speech, precipitating the rise of Silver Latin, with its emphasis on mannerism rather than on solid content, according to Teuffel's model In his second volume, Imperial Period, Teuffel initiated a slight alteration in approach, making it clear that his terms applied to Latin and not just to the period. He also changed his dating scheme from AUC to modern BC/AD. Though he introduces das silberne Zeitalter der römischen Literatur, (The Silver Age of Roman Literature)[16] from the death of Augustus to the death of Trajan (14–117 AD), he also mentions parts of a work by Seneca the Elder, a wenig Einfluss der silbernen Latinität (a slight influence of silver Latin). It's clear that his mindset had shifted from Golden and Silver Ages to Golden and Silver Latin, also to include Latinitas, which at this point must be interpreted as Classical Latin. He may have been influenced in that regard by one of his sources E. Opitz, who in 1852 had published specimen lexilogiae argenteae latinitatis, which includes Silver Latinity.[17] Though Teuffel's First Period was equivalent to Old Latin and his Second Period was equal to the Golden Age, his Third Period die römische Kaiserheit encompasses both the Silver Age and the centuries now termed Late Latin, in which the forms seemed to break loose from their foundation and float freely. That is, men of literature were confounded about the meaning of "good Latin." The last iteration of Classical Latin is known as Silver Latin. The Silver Age is the first of the Imperial Period, and is divided into die Zeit der julischen Dynastie (14–68); die Zeit der flavischen Dynastie (69–96), and die Zeit des Nerva und Trajan (96–117). Subsequently, Teuffel goes over to a century scheme: 2nd, 3rd, etc., through 6th. His later editions (which came about towards the end of the 19th century) divide the Imperial Age into parts: 1st century (Silver Age), 2nd century ( the Hadrian and the Antonines), and the 3rd through 6th centuries. Of the Silver Age proper, Teuffel points out that anything like freedom of speech had vanished with Tiberius:[18] ...the continual apprehension in which men lived caused a restless versatility... Simple or natural composition was considered insipid; the aim of language was to be brilliant... Hence it was dressed up with abundant tinsel of epigrams, rhetorical figures and poetical terms... Mannerism supplanted style, and bombastic pathos took the place of quiet power. The content of new literary works was continually proscribed by the emperor, who exiled or executed existing authors and played the role of literary man, himself (typically badly). Artists therefore went into a repertory of new and dazzling mannerisms, which Teuffel calls "utter unreality." Cruttwell picks up this theme:[19] The foremost of these [characteristics] is unreality, arising from the extinction of freedom... Hence arose a declamatory tone, which strove by frigid and almost hysterical exaggeration to make up for the healthy stimulus afforded by daily contact with affairs. The vein of artificial rhetoric, antithesis and epigram... owes its origin to this forced contentment with an uncongenial sphere. With the decay of freedom, taste sank... Marcus Aurelius, emperor over the last generation of classicists and himself a classicist. In Cruttwell's view (which had not been expressed by Teuffel), Silver Latin was a "rank, weed-grown garden," a "decline."[20] Cruttwell had already decried what he saw as a loss of spontaneity in Golden Latin. Teuffel regarded the Silver Age as a loss of natural language, and therefore of spontaneity, implying that it was last seen in the Golden Age. Instead, Tiberius brought about a "sudden collapse of letters." The idea of a decline had been dominant in English society since Edward Gibbon's Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. Once again, Cruttwell evidences some unease with his stock pronouncements: "The Natural History of Pliny shows how much remained to be done in fields of great interest." The idea of Pliny as a model is not consistent with any sort of decline. Moreover, Pliny did his best work under emperors who were as tolerant as Augustus had been. To include some of the best writings of the Silver Age, Cruttwell extended the period through the death of Marcus Aurelius (180 AD). The philosophic prose of a good emperor was in no way compatible with either Teuffel's view of unnatural language, or Cruttwell's depiction of a decline. Having created these constructs, the two philologists found they could not entirely justify them. Apparently, in the worst implication of their views, there was no such thing as Classical Latin by the ancient definition, and some of the very best writing of any period in world history was deemed stilted, degenerate, unnatural language. The Silver Age furnishes the only two extant Latin novels: Apuleius's The Golden Ass and Petronius's Satyricon. Perhaps history's best-known example of Classical Latin was written by Pontius Pilate on the placard placed above Jesus' Cross: Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudaeorum, which translates to Jesus the Nazarean the King of the Judeans (Jesus of Nazareth the King of the Jews). Writers of the Silver Age include: From the Ides of March to Trajan[edit] Germanicus Caesar Ancient bust of Seneca, part of a double herm (Antikensammlung Berlin) Aulus Cremutius Cordus (died AD 25), historian Marcus Velleius Paterculus (19 BC – 31 AD), military officer, historian Valerius Maximus (1st century AD), rhetorician Masurius Sabinus (1st century AD), jurist Phaedrus (15 BC – AD 50), fabulist Germanicus Julius Caesar (15 BC – AD 19), royal family, imperial officer, translator Aulus Cornelius Celsus (25 BC – AD 50), physician, encyclopedist Quintus Curtius Rufus (1st century AD), historian Cornelius Bocchus (1st century AD), natural historian Pomponius Mela (d. AD 45), geographer Lucius Annaeus Seneca (4 BC – AD 65), educator, imperial advisor, philosopher, man of letters Titus Calpurnius Siculus (1st century AD or possibly later), poet Marcus Valerius Probus (1st century AD), literary critic Tiberius Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus (10 BC – AD 54), emperor, man of letters, public officer Gaius Suetonius Paulinus (1st century AD), general, natural historian Lucius Junius Moderatus Columella (AD 4 – 70), military officer, agriculturalist Quintus Asconius Pedianus (9 BC – 76 AD), historian, Latinist Gaius Musonius Rufus (AD 20 – 101), stoic philosopher Quintus Marcius Barea Soranus (1st century AD), imperial officer and public man Gaius Plinius Secundus (AD 23 – 79), imperial officer and encyclopedist Gaius Valerius Flaccus (1st century AD), epic poet Tiberius Catius Silius Italicus (AD 28 – 103), epic poet Gaius Licinius Mucianus (d. AD 76), general, man of letters Lucilius Junior (1st century AD), poet Aulus Persius Flaccus (34–62 AD), poet and satirist Marcus Fabius Quintilianus (35–100 AD), rhetorician Sextus Julius Frontinus (AD 40 – 103), engineer, writer Marcus Annaeus Lucanus (AD 39 – 65), poet, historian Publius Juventius Celsus Titus Aufidius Hoenius Severianus (1st and early 2nd centuries AD), imperial officer, jurist Aemilius Asper (1st and 2nd centuries AD), grammarian, literary critic Marcus Valerius Martialis (AD 40 – 104), poet, epigrammatist Publius Papinius Statius (AD 45 – 96), poet Decimus Junius Juvenalis (1st and 2nd centuries AD), poet, satirist Publius Annaeus Florus (1st and 2nd centuries AD), poet, rhetorician and probable author of the epitome of Livy Velius Longus (1st and 2nd centuries AD), grammarian, literary critic Flavius Caper (1st and 2nd centuries AD), grammarian Publius or Gaius Cornelius Tacitus (AD 56 − 120), imperial officer, historian and in Teuffel's view "the last classic of Roman literature." Gaius Plinius Caecilius Secundus (AD 62 – 114), historian, imperial officer and correspondent Through the death of Marcus Aurelius, 180 AD[edit] Sketch of Apuleius Of the additional century granted by Cruttwell to Silver Latin, Teuffel says: "The second century was a happy period for the Roman State, the happiest indeed during the whole Empire... But in the world of letters the lassitude and enervation, which told of Rome's decline, became unmistakeable... its forte is in imitation."[21] Teuffel, however, excepts the jurists; others find other "exceptions", recasting Teuffels's view.[clarification needed] Gaius Suetonius Tranquillus (70/75 – after 130 AD), biographer Marcus Junianus Justinus (2nd century AD), historian Lucius Octavius Cornelius Publius Salvius Julianus Aemilianus (AD 110–170), imperial officer, jurist Sextus Pomponius (2nd century AD), jurist Quintus Terentius Scaurus (2nd century AD), grammarian, literary critic Aulus Gellius (AD 125 – after 180), grammarian, polymath Lucius Apuleius Platonicus (123/125–180 AD), novelist Marcus Cornelius Fronto (AD 100–170), advocate, grammarian Gaius Sulpicius Apollinaris (2nd century AD), educator, literary commentator Granius Licinianus (2nd century AD), writer Lucius Ampelius (2nd century AD), educator Gaius (AD 130–180), jurist Lucius Volusius Maecianus (2nd century AD), educator, jurist Marcus Minucius Felix (d. AD 250), apologist of Christianity, "the first Christian work in Latin" (Teuffel) Sextus Julius Africanus (2nd century AD), Christian historian Marcus Aurelius Antoninus Augustus (121–180 AD, stoic philosopher, Emperor in Latin, essayist in ancient Greek, role model of the last generation of classicists (Cruttwell) Stylistic shifts[edit] Style of language refers to repeatable features of speech that are somewhat less general than the fundamental characteristics of a language. The latter provides unity, allowing it to be referred to by a single name. Thus Old Latin, Classical Latin, Vulgar Latin, etc., are not considered different languages, but are all referred to by the term, Latin. This is an ancient practice continued by moderns rather than a philological innovation of recent times. That Latin had case endings is a fundamental feature of the language. Whether a given form of speech prefers to use prepositions such as ad, ex, de, for "to," "from" and "of" rather than simple case endings is a matter of style. Latin has a large number of styles. Each and every author has a style, which typically allows his prose or poetry to be identified by experienced Latinists. Problems in comparative literature have risen out of group styles finding similarity by period, in which case one may speak of Old Latin, Silver Latin, Late Latin as styles or a phase of styles. The ancient authors themselves first defined style by recognizing different kinds of sermo, or "speech". By valuing Classical Latin as "first class", it was better to write with Latinitas selected by authors who were attuned to literary and upper-class languages of the city as a standardized style. All sermo that differed from it was a different style. Thus, in rhetoric, Cicero was able to define sublime, intermediate, and low styles within Classical Latin. St. Augustine recommend low style for sermons.[22] Style was to be defined by deviation in speech from a standard. Teuffel termed this standard "Golden Latin". John Edwin Sandys, who was an authority in Latin style for several decades, summarizes the differences between Golden and Silver Latin as follows:[23] Silver Latin is to be distinguished by: "an exaggerated conciseness and point" "occasional archaic words and phrases derived from poetry" "increase in the number of Greek words in ordinary use" (the Emperor Claudius in Suetonius refers to "both our languages," Latin and Greek[24]) "literary reminiscences" "The literary use of words from the common dialect" (dictare and dictitare as well as classical dicere, "to say") See also[edit] Languages portal Classic Classical antiquity Classics Late Latin Latin Latin literature Medieval Latin New Latin Social class in ancient Rome Notes[edit] ^ When rarely used in English, the term is capitalized: Latinitas. In Latin it was written all in uppercase: LATINITAS, as were all words in Latin. References[edit] Citations[edit] ^ Citroni 2006, p. 204. ^ Citroni 2006, p. 205. ^ Citroni 2006, p. 206, reported in Aulus Gellius, 9.8.15. ^ Citroni 2006, p. 207. ^ Bradford, William (1855) [1648]. "Gov. Bradford's Dialogue". In Morton, Nathaniel (ed.). New England's Memorial. Boston: Congregational Board of Publication. p. 330. ^ Littlefield 1904, p. 301. ^ Ainsworth, Robert (January 1736). "Article XXX: Thesaurus Linguae Latinae Compendarius". The Present State of the Republic of Letters. London: W. Innys and R. Manby. XVII. ^ Gorak, Jan (1991). The making of the modern canon: genesis and crisis of a literary idea. London: Athlone. p. 51. ^ Cruttwell 1877, p. 3. ^ Cruttwell 1877, p. 142. ^ Teuffel 1873, p. 216. ^ Teuffel 1873, p. 226. ^ Bielfeld 1770, p. 244. ^ Bielfeld 1770, p. 345. ^ Teuffel 1873, p. 385, "Public life became extinct, all political business passed into the hands of the monarch..." ^ Teuffel 1873, p. 526. ^ Teuffel 1873, p. 530. ^ Teuffel & Schwabe 1892, pp. 4–5. ^ Cruttwell 1877, p. 6. ^ Cruttwell 1877, p. 341. ^ Teuffel & Schwabe 1892, p. 192. ^ Auerbach, Erich; Mannheim, Ralph (Translator) (1965) [1958]. Literary Language and its Public in Late Latin Antiquity and in the Middle Ages. Bollingen Series LXXIV. Pantheon Books. p. 33. ^ Sandys, John Edwin (1921). A Companion to Latin Studies Edited for the Syndics of the University Press (3rd ed.). Cambridge: University Press. pp. 824–26. ^ Suetonius, Claudius, 24.1. General sources[edit] Bielfeld, Baron (1770), The Elements of Universal Erudition, Containing an Analytical Abridgement of the Science, Polite Arts and Belles Lettres, III, translated by Hooper, W., London: G Scott Citroni, Mario (2006), "The Concept of the Classical and the Canons of Model Authors in Roman Literature", in Porter, James I. (ed.), The Classical Tradition of Greece and Rome, translated by Packham, RA, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 204–34 Cruttwell, Charles Thomas (1877), A History of Roman Literature from the Earliest Period to the Death of Marcus Aurelius, London: Charles Griffin & Co. Littlefield, George Emery (1904), Early Schools and School-books of New England, Boston, MA: Club of Odd Volumes Settis, Salvatore (2006), The Future of the "Classical", translated by Cameron, Allan, Cambridge, UK; Malden, MA: Polity Press Teuffel, Wilhelm Sigismund (1873), A History of Roman Literature, translated by Wagner, Wilhelm, London: George Bell & Sons Teuffel, Wilhelm Sigismund; Schwabe, Ludwig (1892), Teuffel's History of Roman Literature Revised and Enlarged, II, The Imperial Period, translated by Warr, George C.W. (from the 5th German ed.), London: George Bell & Sons Further reading[edit] Library resources about Classical Latin Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries Allen, William Sidney. 1978. Vox Latina: A Guide to the Pronunciation of Classical Latin. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cruttwell, Charles Thomas (2005) [1877]. A History of Roman Literature from the Earliest Period to the Death of Marcus Aurelius. London: Charles Griffin and Company, Project Gutenberg. Retrieved 26 September 2009. Dickey, Eleanor. 2012. "How to Say 'Please' in Classical Latin". The Classical Quarterly 62, no. 2: 731–48. doi:10.1017/S0009838812000286. Getty, Robert J. 1963. "Classical Latin meter and prosody, 1935–1962". Lustrum 8: 104–60. Levene, David. 1997. "God and man in the Classical Latin panegyric". Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 43: 66–103. Lovric, Michelle, and Nikiforos Doxiadis Mardas. 1998. How to Insult, Abuse & Insinuate In Classical Latin. London: Ebury Press. Rosén, Hannah. 1999. Latine Loqui: Trends and Directions In the Crystallization of Classical Latin. München: W. Fink. Spevak, Olga. 2010. Constituent Order In Classical Latin Prose. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. Teuffel, W. S. (2001) [1870]. Geschichte der Römischen Literatur (in German). Leipzig: B.G. Teubner. Retrieved 25 September 2009. External links[edit] The Latin Library—Public domain Latin texts Latin Texts at the Perseus Collection Greek and Roman Authors on LacusCurtius Classical Latin Texts at the Packard Humanities Institute Latin Texts at Attalus A collection of Latin and Greek texts at the Schola Latina v t e Ages of Latin until 75 BC Old Latin 75 BC – 200 AD Classical Latin 200–900 Late Latin 900–1300 Medieval Latin 1300–1500 Renaissance Latin 1500–1900 New Latin 1900–present Contemporary Latin History of Latin Latin literature Vulgar Latin Ecclesiastical Latin Romance languages Latino sine flexione Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum Hiberno-Latin Judeo-Latin v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Classical_Latin&oldid=996319355" Categories: Classical Latin literature 1st-century BC establishments in the Roman Republic 3rd-century disestablishments Classical languages Forms of Latin Languages attested from the 1st century BC Languages extinct in the 3rd century Latin language in ancient Rome Hidden categories: Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata Use dmy dates from November 2015 Articles containing Latin-language text Languages without Glottolog code Historical forms of languages with ISO codes Languages without ISO 639-3 code but with Linguist List code Languages without ISO 639-3 code but with Linguasphere code Language articles with unreferenced extinction date All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from December 2010 Articles with unsourced statements from July 2013 Wikipedia articles needing clarification from March 2014 CS1: long volume value CS1 German-language sources (de) Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages العربية تۆرکجه Boarisch Català Deutsch Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français 한국어 Bahasa Indonesia Қазақша لۊری شومالی Lumbaart Македонски Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Occitan پنجابی Papiamentu Português Русский Simple English Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Українська اردو 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 25 December 2020, at 21:41 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2810 ---- Roman currency - Wikipedia Roman currency From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia   (Redirected from Roman Imperial currency) Jump to navigation Jump to search Denarius of Marcus Aurelius. Legend: IMP. M. ANTONINVS AVG. TR. P. XXV. Numismatics Currency Coins Banknotes Forgery List ISO Circulating currencies Africa The Americas Europe Asia Oceania Local currencies Company scrip LETS Time dollars Fictional currencies Proposed currencies History Historical currencies Greek Roman China India Persian Tibetan Thai Filipino Malay Byzantine Medieval currencies Production Mint Designers Coining Milling Hammering Cast Exonumia Credit cards Medals Tokens Cheques Notaphily Banknotes Scripophily Stocks Bonds Glossary of numismatics  Numismatics portal  Money portal v t e Roman currency for most of Roman history consisted of gold, silver, bronze, orichalcum and copper coinage[1] (see: Roman metallurgy). From its introduction to the Republic, during the third century BC, well into Imperial times, Roman currency saw many changes in form, denomination, and composition. A persistent feature was the inflationary debasement and replacement of coins over the centuries. Notable examples of this followed the reforms of Diocletian. This trend continued into Byzantine times. Due to the economic power and longevity of the Roman state, Roman currency was widely used throughout western Eurasia and northern Africa from classical times into the Middle Ages. It served as a model for the currencies of the Muslim caliphates and the European states during the Middle Ages and the Modern Era. Roman currency names survive today in many countries (e.g., the Arabic dinar (from the denarius coin), the British pound and Mexican peso (both translations of the Roman libra)). Contents 1 Authority to mint coins 1.1 Roman Republic: c. 500 – 27 BC 2 Iconography and design 2.1 Imperial iconography 3 Value and composition 3.1 Debasement 3.2 Equivalences 4 See also 5 References 5.1 Footnotes 5.2 Bibliography 6 External links Authority to mint coins[edit] The manufacture of coins in the Roman culture, dating from about the 4th century BC, significantly influenced later development of coin minting in Europe. The origin of the word "mint" is ascribed to the manufacture of silver coin at Rome in 269 BC near the temple of Juno Moneta. This goddess became the personification of money, and her name was applied both to money and to its place of manufacture. Roman mints were spread widely across the Empire, and were sometimes used for propaganda purposes. The populace often learned of a new Roman Emperor when coins appeared with the new Emperor's portrait. Some of the emperors who ruled only for a short time made sure that a coin bore their image[citation needed]; Quietus, for example, ruled only part of the Roman Empire from 260 to 261 AD, and yet he issued two coins bearing his image. The Romans cast their larger copper coins in clay moulds carrying distinctive markings, not because they did not know about striking, but because it was not suitable for such large masses of metal. Roman Republic: c. 500 – 27 BC[edit] Main article: Roman Republican currency Bronze aes signatum produced by the Roman Republic after 450 BC. Roman adoption of metallic commodity money was a late development in monetary history. Bullion bars and ingots were used as money in Mesopotamia since the 7th millennium BC; and Greeks in Asia Minor had pioneered the use of coinage (which they employed in addition to other more primitive, monetary mediums of exchange) as early as the 7th century BC.[2] Coinage proper was only introduced by the Roman Republican government c. 300 BC. The greatest city of the Magna Graecia region in southern Italy, and several other Italian cities, already had a long tradition of using coinage by this time and produced them in large quantities during the 4th century BC to pay for their wars against the inland Italian groups encroaching on their territory. For these reasons, the Romans would have certainly known about coinage systems long before their government actually introduced them. The reason behind Rome's adoption of coinage was likely cultural. The Romans had no pressing economic need, but they wanted to emulate Greek culture; they considered the institution of minted money a significant feature of that culture. However, Roman coinage initially saw very limited use.[3] The type of money introduced by Rome was unlike that found elsewhere in the ancient Mediterranean. It combined a number of uncommon elements. One example is the large bronze bullion, the aes signatum (Latin for signed bronze). It measured about 160 by 90 millimetres (6.3 by 3.5 in) and weighed around 1,500 to 1,600 grams (53 to 56 oz), being made out of a highly leaded tin bronze. Although similar metal currency bars had been produced in Italy and northern Etruscan areas, these had been made of Aes grave, an unrefined metal with a high iron content.[4] Along with the aes signatum, the Roman state also issued a series of bronze and silver coins that emulated the styles of those produced in Greek cities.[5] Produced using the manner of manufacture then utilised in Greek Naples, the designs of these early coins were also heavily influenced by Greek designs.[6] The designs on the coinage of the Republican period displayed a "solid conservatism", usually illustrating mythical scenes or personifications of various gods and goddesses.[7] Iconography and design[edit] Imperial iconography[edit] The most commonly used coin denominations and their relative sizes during Roman times. Coins of the Roman Republic and Empire - from Cassell's History of England, Vol. I - anonymous author and artists The imagery on coins took an important step when Julius Caesar issued coins bearing his own portrait. While moneyers had earlier issued coins with portraits of ancestors, Caesar's was the first Roman coinage to feature the portrait of a living individual. The tradition continued following Caesar's assassination, although the imperators from time to time also produced coins featuring the traditional deities and personifications found on earlier coins. The image of the Roman emperor took on a special importance in the centuries that followed, because during the empire, the emperor embodied the state and its policies. The names of moneyers continued to appear on the coins until the middle of Augustus' reign. Although the duty of moneyers during the Empire is not known, since the position was not abolished, it is believed that they still had some influence over the imagery of the coins. The main focus of the imagery during the empire was on the portrait of the emperor. Coins were an important means of disseminating this image throughout the empire. Coins often attempted to make the emperor appear god-like through associating the emperor with attributes normally seen in divinities, or emphasizing the special relationship between the emperor and a particular deity by producing a preponderance of coins depicting that deity. During his campaign against Pompey, Caesar issued a variety of types that featured images of either Venus or Aeneas, attempting to associate himself with his divine ancestors. An example of an emperor who went to an extreme in proclaiming divine status was Commodus. In 192 A.D., he issued a series of coins depicting his bust clad in a lion-skin (the usual depiction of Hercules) on the obverse, and an inscription proclaiming that he was the Roman incarnation of Hercules on the reverse. Although Commodus was excessive in his depiction of his image, this extreme case is indicative of the objective of many emperors in the exploitation of their portraits. While the emperor is by far the most frequent portrait on the obverse of coins, heirs apparent, predecessors, and other family members, such as empresses, were also featured. To aid in succession, the legitimacy of an heir was affirmed by producing coins for that successor. This was done from the time of Augustus till the end of the empire. Featuring the portrait of an individual on a coin, which became legal in 44 BC, caused the coin to be viewed as embodying the attributes of the individual portrayed. Dio wrote that following the death of Caligula the Senate demonetized his coinage, and ordered that they be melted. Regardless of whether or not this actually occurred, it demonstrates the importance and meaning that was attached to the imagery on a coin. The philosopher Epictetus jokingly wrote: "Whose image does this sestertius carry? Trajan's? Give it to me. Nero's? Throw it away, it is unacceptable, it is rotten." Although the writer did not seriously expect people to get rid of their coins, this quotation demonstrates that the Romans attached a moral value to the images on their coins. Unlike the obverse, which during the imperial period almost always featured a portrait, the reverse was far more varied in its depiction. During the late Republic there were often political messages to the imagery, especially during the periods of civil war. However, by the middle of the Empire, although there were types that made important statements, and some that were overtly political or propagandistic in nature, the majority of the types were stock images of personifications or deities. While some images can be related to the policy or actions of a particular emperor, many of the choices seem arbitrary and the personifications and deities were so prosaic that their names were often omitted, as they were readily recognizable by their appearance and attributes alone. It can be argued that within this backdrop of mostly indistinguishable types, exceptions would be far more pronounced. Atypical reverses are usually seen during and after periods of war, at which time emperors make various claims of liberation, subjugation, and pacification. Some of these reverse images can clearly be classified as propaganda. An example struck by emperor Philip in 244 features a legend proclaiming the establishment of peace with Persia; in truth, Rome had been forced to pay large sums in tribute to the Persians. Although it is difficult to make accurate generalizations about reverse imagery, as this was something that varied by emperor, some trends do exist. An example is reverse types of the military emperors during the second half of the third century, where virtually all of the types were the common and standard personifications and deities. A possible explanation for the lack of originality is that these emperors were attempting to present conservative images to establish their legitimacy, something that many of these emperors lacked. Although these emperors relied on traditional reverse types, their portraits often emphasized their authority through stern gazes,[8][citation needed] and even featured the bust of the emperor clad in armor.[9] Value and composition[edit] Unlike most modern coins, Roman coins had (at least in the early centuries) significant intrinsic value. However, while the gold and silver issues contained precious metals, the value of a coin could be slightly higher than its precious metal content, so they were not, strictly speaking, equivalent to bullion. Also, over the course of time the purity and weight of the silver coins were reduced. Estimates of the value of the denarius range from 1.6 to 2.85 times its metal content,[citation needed] thought to equal the purchasing power of 10 modern British Pound Sterling at the beginning of the Roman Empire to around 18 Pound Sterling by its end (comparing bread, wine and meat prices) and, over the same period, around one to three days' pay for a Legionary.[10] The coinage system that existed in Egypt until the time of Diocletian's monetary reform was a closed system based upon the heavily debased tetradrachm. Although the value of these tetradrachms can be reckoned as being equivalent to that of the denarius, their precious metal content was always much lower. Elsewhere also, not all coins that circulated contained precious metals, as the value of these coins was too great to be convenient for everyday purchases. A dichotomy existed between the coins with an intrinsic value and those with only a token value. This is reflected in the infrequent and inadequate production of bronze coinage during the Republic, where from the time of Sulla till the time of Augustus no bronze coins were minted at all; even during the periods when bronze coins were produced, their workmanship was sometimes very crude and of low quality. Debasement[edit] The rapid decline in silver purity of the antoninianus The type of coins issued changed under the coinage reform of Diocletian, the heavily debased antoninianus (double denarius) was replaced with a variety of new denominations, and a new range of imagery was introduced that attempted to convey different ideas. The new government set up by Diocletian was a tetrarchy, or rule by four, with each emperor receiving a separate territory to rule. The new imagery includes a large, stern portrait that is representative of the emperor. This image was not meant to show the actual portrait of a particular emperor, but was instead a character that embodied the power that the emperor possessed. The reverse type was equally universal, featuring the spirit (or genius) of the Romans. The introduction of a new type of government and a new system of coinage represents an attempt by Diocletian to return peace and security to Rome, after the previous century of constant warfare and uncertainty. Diocletian characterizes the emperor as an interchangeable authority figure by depicting him with a generalized image. He tries to emphasize unity amongst the Romans by featuring the spirit of Romans (Sutherland 254). The reverse types of coins of the late Empire emphasized general themes, and discontinued the more specific personifications depicted previously. The reverse types featured legends that proclaimed the glory of Rome, the glory of the army, victory against the "barbarians", the restoration of happy times, and the greatness of the emperor. These general types persisted even after the adoption of Christianity as the state religion of the Roman Empire. Muted Christian imagery, such as standards that featured Christograms (the chi-rho monogram for Jesus Christ's name in Greek) were introduced, but with a few rare exceptions, there were no explicitly Christian themes. From the time of Constantine until the "end" of the Roman Empire, coins featured almost indistinguishable idealized portraits and general proclamations of greatness. Although the denarius remained the backbone of the Roman economy from its introduction in 211 BC until it ceased to be normally minted in the middle of the third century, the purity and weight of the coin slowly, but inexorably, decreased. The problem of debasement in the Roman economy appears to be pervasive, although the severity of the debasement often paralleled the strength or weakness of the Empire. While it is not clear why debasement was such a common occurrence for the Romans, it's believed that it was caused by several factors, including a lack of precious metals and inadequacies in state finances. When introduced, the denarius contained nearly pure silver at a theoretical weight of approximately 4.5 grams, but from the time of Nero onwards the tendency was nearly always for its purity to be decreased. The theoretical standard, although not usually met in practice, remained fairly stable throughout the Republic, with the notable exception of times of war. The large number of coins required to raise an army and pay for supplies often necessitated the debasement of the coinage. An example of this is the denarii that were struck by Mark Antony to pay his army during his battles against Octavian. These coins, slightly smaller in diameter than a normal denarius, were made of noticeably debased silver. The obverse features a galley and the name Antony, while the reverse features the name of the particular legion that each issue was intended for (hoard evidence shows that these coins remained in circulation over 200 years after they were minted, due to their lower silver content). The coinage of the Julio-Claudians remained stable at 4 grams of silver, until the debasement of Nero in 64, when the silver content was reduced to 3.8 grams, perhaps due to the cost of rebuilding the city after fire consumed a considerable portion of Rome. The denarius continued to decline slowly in purity, with a notable reduction instituted by Septimius Severus. This was followed by the introduction of a double denarius piece, differentiated from the denarius by the radiate crown worn by the emperor. The coin is commonly called the antoninianus by numismatists after the emperor Caracalla, who introduced the coin in early 215. Although nominally valued at two denarii, the antoninianus never contained more than 1.6 times the amount of silver of the denarius. The profit of minting a coin valued at two denarii, but weighing only about one and a half times as much is obvious; the reaction to these coins by the public is unknown. As the number of antoniniani minted increased, the number of denarii minted decreased, until the denarius ceased to be minted in significant quantities by the middle of the third century. Again, coinage saw its greatest debasement during times of war and uncertainty. The second half of the third century was rife with this war and uncertainty, and the silver content of the antonianus fell to only 2%, losing almost any appearance of being silver. During this time the aureus remained slightly more stable, before it too became smaller and more base (lower gold content and higher base metal content) before Diocletian's reform. The decline in the silver content to the point where coins contained virtually no silver at all was countered by the monetary reform of Aurelian in 274. The standard for silver in the antonianus was set at twenty parts copper to one part silver, and the coins were noticeably marked as containing that amount (XXI in Latin or KA in Greek). Despite the reform of Aurelian, silver content continued to decline, until the monetary reform of Diocletian. In addition to establishing the tetrarchy, Diocletian devised the following system of denominations: an aureus struck at the standard of 60 to the pound, a new silver coin struck at the old Neronian standard known as the argenteus, and a new large bronze coin that contained two percent silver. Diocletian issued an Edict on Maximum Prices in 301, which attempted to establish the legal maximum prices that could be charged for goods and services. The attempt to establish maximum prices was an exercise in futility as maximum prices were impossible to enforce. The Edict was reckoned in terms of denarii, although no such coin had been struck for over 50 years (it is believed that the bronze follis was valued at ​12 1⁄2 denarii). Like earlier reforms, this too eroded and was replaced by an uncertain coinage consisting mostly of gold and bronze. The exact relationship and denomination of the bronze issues of a variety of sizes is not known, and is believed to have fluctuated heavily on the market. The exact reason that Roman coinage sustained constant debasement is not known, but the most common theories involve inflation, trade with India, which drained silver from the Mediterranean world, and inadequacies in state finances. It is clear from papyri that the pay of the Roman soldier increased from 900 sestertii a year under Augustus to 2000 sestertii a year under Septimius Severus and the price of grain more than tripled indicating that fall in real wages and a moderate inflation occurred during this time.[11] Another reason for debasement was lack of raw metal with which to produce coins. Italy itself contains no large or reliable mines for precious metals; therefore the precious metals for coinage had to be obtained elsewhere. The majority of the precious metals that Rome obtained during its period of expansion arrived in the form of war booty from defeated territories, and subsequent tribute and taxes by new-conquered lands. When Rome ceased to expand, the precious metals for coinage then came from newly mined silver, such as from Greece and Spain, and from melting older coins. Without a constant influx of precious metals from an outside source, and with the expense of continual wars, it would seem reasonable that coins might be debased to increase the amount that the government could spend. This explanation for the debasement of coinage is that it allowed the state to spend more than it had. By decreasing the amount of silver in its coins, Rome could produce more coins and "stretch" its budget. As time progressed, the trade deficit of the west, because of its buying of grain and other commodities, led to a currency drainage in Rome. Equivalences[edit] The first rows show the values of each boldface coin in the first column in relation to the coins in the following columns: Early Republic values[12][13] (after 211 BC) Denarius Sestertius Dupondius As Semis Quincunx Triens Quadrans Uncia Denarius 1 4 5 10 20 24 30 40 120 Sestertius ​1⁄4 1 ​1  1⁄4 ​2  1⁄2 5 6 ​7  1⁄2 10 30 Dupondius ​1⁄5 ​4⁄5 1 2 4 ​4  4⁄5 6 8 24 As ​1⁄10 ​2⁄5 ​1⁄2 1 2 ​2  2⁄5 3 4 12 Semis ​1⁄20 ​1⁄5 ​1⁄4 ​1⁄2 1 ​1  1⁄5 ​1  1⁄2 2 6 Quincunx ​1⁄24 ​1⁄6 ​5⁄24 ​5⁄12 ​5⁄6 1 ​1  1⁄4 ​1  2⁄3 5 Triens ​1⁄30 ​2⁄15 ​1⁄6 ​1⁄3 ​2⁄3 ​4⁄5 1 ​1  1⁄3 4 Quadrans ​1⁄40 ​1⁄10 ​1⁄8 ​1⁄4 ​1⁄2 ​3⁄5 ​3⁄4 1 3 Uncia ​1⁄120 ​1⁄30 ​1⁄24 ​1⁄12 ​1⁄6 ​1⁄5 ​1⁄4 ​1⁄3 1 Augustan values (27 BC – AD 301) Aureus Quinarius Aureus Denarius Quinarius Sestertius Dupondius As Semis Quadrans Aureus 1 2 25 50 100 200 400 800 1600 Quinarius Aureus ​1⁄2 1 ​12  1⁄2 25 50 100 200 400 800 Denarius ​1⁄25 ​2⁄25 1 2 4 8 16 32 64 Quinarius Argenteus ​1⁄50 ​1⁄25 ​1⁄2 1 2 4 8 16 32 Sestertius ​1⁄100 ​1⁄50 ​1⁄4 ​1⁄2 1 2 4 8 16 Dupondius ​1⁄200 ​1⁄100 ​1⁄8 ​1⁄4 ​1⁄2 1 2 4 8 As ​1⁄400 ​1⁄200 ​1⁄16 ​1⁄8 ​1⁄4 ​1⁄2 1 2 4 Semis ​1⁄800 ​1⁄400 ​1⁄32 ​1⁄16 ​1⁄8 ​1⁄4 ​1⁄2 1 2 Quadrans ​1⁄1600 ​1⁄800 ​1⁄64 ​1⁄32 ​1⁄16 ​1⁄8 ​1⁄4 ​1⁄2 1 Diocletian values (301–305) Solidus Argenteus Nummus Radiate Laureate Denarius Solidus 1 10 40 200 500 1000 Argenteus ​1⁄10 1 4 20 50 100 Nummus ​1⁄40 ​1⁄4 1 5 ​12  1⁄2 25 Radiate ​1⁄200 ​1⁄20 ​1⁄5 1 ​2  1⁄2 5 Laureate ​1⁄500 ​1⁄50 ​2⁄25 ​2⁄5 1 2 Denarius ​1⁄1000 ​1⁄100 ​1⁄25 ​1⁄5 ​1⁄2 1 Late Empire coin values (337–476) Solidus Miliarense Siliqua Follis Nummus Solidus 1 12 24 180 7200 Miliarense ​1⁄12 1 2 15 600 Siliqua ​1⁄24 ​1⁄2 1 ​7  1⁄2 300 Follis ​1⁄180 ​1⁄15 ​2⁄15 1 40 Nummus ​1⁄7200 ​1⁄600 ​1⁄300 ​1⁄40 1 See also[edit] Numismatics portal Money portal Cupellation List of historical currencies Roman economy Roman Republican coinage Roman provincial currency Byzantine coinage Visigothic coinage Sasanian coinage Roman Republican moneyers Tessera Spintria Ancient Symbols (Unicode block) References[edit] Footnotes[edit] ^ "Blanchard and Company, Inc. - The Twelve Caesars". Retrieved February 8, 2017. ^ Metcalf 2012, p. 33. ^ Burnett 1987. pp. 15–16. ^ Burnett 1987. p. 3. ^ Burnett 1987. pp. 4–5. ^ Burnett 1987. p. 16. ^ Reece 1970. p. 19. ^ Trentinella, Rosemarie (October 2003). "Roman Portrait Sculpture: The Stylistic Cycle". www.metmuseum.org. Retrieved 2019-08-13. ^ "Probus". www.forumancientcoins.com. Retrieved 2019-05-06. ^ "Buying Power of Ancient Coins". Archived from the original on February 10, 2013. Retrieved 2013-02-10. ^ ancientcoins.biz ^ W.G. Sayles, Ancient Coin Collecting III: The Roman World-Politics and Propaganda, Iola, 1997, p. 20. ^ William Boyne, A Manual of Roman Coins: from the earliest period to the extinction of the empire, W. H. Johnston, 1865, p. 7. Available online. Bibliography[edit] Burnett, Andrew (1987). Coinage in the Roman World. London: Seaby. ISBN 978-0-900652-84-4. Cohen, Henry, Description historiques des monnaies frappées sous l'Empire romain, Paris, 1882, 8 vols. There exists online version of this Cohen's catalogue Greene, Kevin. Archaeology of the Roman Economy. Berkeley, California: University of California Press, 1986. Howgego, Christopher. Ancient History from Coins. London: Routledge, 1995. Jones, A. H. M. The Roman Economy: Studies in Ancient Economic and Administrative History. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1974. Melville Jones, John R., 'A Dictionary of Ancient Roman Coins', London, Spink 2003. Metcalf, William E. (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Coinage. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780195305746. Reece, Richard (1970). Roman Coins. London: Ernest Benn Limited. ISBN 978-0-510-06151-7. Salmon, E. Togo. Roman Coins and Public Life under the Empire. Ann Arbor, Michigan: The University of Michigan Press, 1999. Suarez, Rasiel. The Encyclopedia of Roman Imperial Coins. Dirty Old Books, 2005. Sutherland, C. H. V. Roman Coins. New York: G. P. (Also published by Barrie and Jenkins in London in 1974 with ISBN 0-214-66808-8) Van Meter, David. The Handbook of Roman Imperial Coins. Laurion Press, 1990. Vecchi, Italo. Italian Cast Coinage. A descriptive catalogue of the cast coinage of Rome and Italy. London Ancient Coins, London 2013. Hard bound in quarto format, 84 pages, 92 plates. ISBN 978-0-9575784-0-1 External links[edit] A Collection of Flavian coins Wikimedia Commons has media related to Roman currency. Library resources about Roman currency Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films v t e Currencies of Ancient Rome Proto-currency Bronze Aes rude Aes signatum Republican era Gold Aureus Silver Denarius Sestertius Victoriatus Quadrigatus Bronze and copper Dupondius (2 asses) As (1) Dodrans (​3⁄4) Bes (​2⁄3) Semis (​1⁄2) Quincunx (​5⁄12) Triens (​1⁄3) Quadrans (​1⁄4) Sextans (​1⁄6) Uncia (​1⁄12) Semuncia (​1⁄24) Early Empire Gold Aureus Dacicus Silver Antoninianus (32 asses) Denarius (16) Quinarius (8) Copper Double sestertius (8) Sestertius (​2  1⁄2; later 4) Dupondius (2) As (1) Semis (​1⁄2) Quadrans (​1⁄4) Diocletian era Gold Solidus Silver Argenteus Nummus Copper Radiate Laureate Denarius Late Empire Gold Solidus Tremissis Silver Miliarense Siliqua Copper and bronze Follis Nummus Constantinian bronzes Centenionalis Ancient Rome Portal Numismatics Portal Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Roman_currency&oldid=996134059#Empire" Categories: Coins of ancient Rome Numismatics Economic history of Italy Ancient Roman sculpture Hidden categories: All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from April 2018 Articles containing Latin-language text Articles with unsourced statements from September 2007 Articles with unsourced statements from February 2012 Commons link is on Wikidata Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Languages العربية Bosanski Català Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Français Galego 贛語 Bahasa Indonesia Interlingua Italiano ქართული Latina Lietuvių Nederlands 日本語 Polski Português Română Русский Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Svenska Українська ייִדיש Edit links This page was last edited on 24 December 2020, at 19:02 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2830 ---- Anthony Alsop - Wikipedia Anthony Alsop From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Anthony Alsop was born about 1670 and died in Winchester on 10 June 1726. He was a clergyman and Neo-Latin poet who sided with the Tory Party at the end of the Stuart era. His poetry was admired at the time but was eventually forgotten until a recent interest in such work brought him to notice again. Contents 1 Life 2 Poetry 3 References 4 External links Life[edit] Alsop was born at Darley Dale in Derbyshire and educated at Westminster School. Going on to Christ Church, Oxford, in 1690, he took the degrees of Bachelor of Arts in 1695 and Master of Arts in 1697. While there he gained a reputation for his elegant Latin verse, some of it produced for public university occasions, some for private circulation, and some Jacobite in spirit. His speciality was the witty verse epistle, most often using the Sapphic stanza. In 1698 Alsop edited a selection of Aesop’s Fables in Latin verse, Fabularum Aesopicarum Delectus.[1] It contains 237 fables in Latin, with the original Greek of the first 158, the Hebrew of the next 10, the Arabic of the next 8, whilst the other 60 are in Latin only. Two of his satirical epistles on Oxford figures were printed in broadsheet form in 1706, the year in which he gained the degree of Bachelor of Divinity and through patronage was made a prebendary at Winchester Cathedral, with the rectory of Brightwell in Berkshire. After Alsop married in 1716, he was sued for breach of promise by his mistress and, having lost the case, had to flee abroad for a while. He died in an accident at his home in 1726 with the reputation of an agreeable and witty companion, a learned preacher and a fine lyric poet, although his loose manner of living and sometimes bawdy verse had kept him confined to a small circle of admirers. Poetry[edit] Alsop left many Latin odes in manuscript which were published in 1752 by his stepson Francis Bernard as Antonii Alsopi, Aedis Christi Olim Alumni, Odarum Libri Duo. In the introduction it is claimed that the author was "esteemed inferior only to his master Horace," a judgment that Alexander Pope seems to second in his line in the Dunciad, "[Let] Alsop never but like Horace joke" (IV.224). In addition Alsop published some slight poems in English in magazines, of which four addresses to "Chlorinda" appeared in Robert Dodsley’s Collection of Poems in Six Volumes (1782).[2] The humorous nature of his Latin writing can be gained from some of the personal epistles he wrote. That written to the aristocratic archdeacon Henry Bridges in 1721 contains the satirical advice to trim his High church religious views to those of the new Hanoverian establishment: Be wise at last, and learn those skills by which to be accounted great and good. Let the pattern of worship be everywhere free, unconfined by law; let each have his own faith and mind, under no leader or guidance, for who can bear the imperious yoke of the clergy, or priestly control?"[3] Another to the lawyer Joseph Taylor begins with a Horatian invitation to supper but then playfully adapts the Latin to the contemporary situation of enjoying smuggled goods: "I have a little bottle of wine (vasculum Bacchi), brought by a friendly ship, without the knowledge of the customs officer (clam quaestore)."[4] Another poem warns him of the tedious and expensive process of bribing his way into Parliament, when "you must furrow your way through a great ocean of liquor, many clouds of smoke must pour out and a perpetual flow of ale."[5] The two books of Alsop's odes was not reprinted and he was forgotten until a biographical and critical study of him, with a modern edition of the Latin and English poems, was published in 1998.[6] References[edit] ^ Google Books ^ vol.6, pp.256-268 ^ Lines 17-24 ^ Lines 7-8 ^ The Oxford Handbook of Neo-Latin (2015), pp.83-4 ^ D. K. Money, The English Horace: Anthony Alsop and the Tradition of British Latin Verse, Oxford University 1998. Biographical details are chiefly taken from two sources. "Alsop, Anthony" in the Dictionary of National Biography (1885–1900). "Anthony Alsop" in The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Eighteenth-Century Writers and Writing, (Oxford 2011) External links[edit] Anthony Alsop at the Eighteenth-Century Poetry Archive (ECPA) Authority control BNF: cb144570213 (data) GND: 121033031 ISNI: 0000 0000 1275 2120 LCCN: n85017826 NKC: jx20090417001 NTA: 168141558 SNAC: w6c251f2 VIAF: 71615658 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n85017826 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anthony_Alsop&oldid=948883582" Categories: 1726 deaths 18th-century English people Alumni of Christ Church, Oxford English male poets People from Brightwell-cum-Sotwell Hidden categories: EngvarB from April 2014 Use dmy dates from April 2014 Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with SNAC-ID identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Year of birth unknown Place of birth missing Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Español Edit links This page was last edited on 3 April 2020, at 15:36 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2860 ---- Garcilaso de la Vega (poet) - Wikipedia Garcilaso de la Vega (poet) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search For the Spanish Peruvian writer, see Garcilaso de la Vega (chronicler). Spanish poet Garcilaso de la Vega KOS Portrait at the New Gallery, Kassel Born García Laso de la Vega 15 February 1498–1503 Toledo, Spain Died (1536-10-14)14 October 1536 (aged 33–38) Nice, Duchy of Savoy (present-day France) Garcilaso de la Vega, KOS (c. 1501 – 14 October 1536) was a Spanish soldier and poet. Although not the first or the only one to do so, he was the most influential poet to introduce Italian Renaissance verse forms, poetic techniques, and themes to Spain. He was well known in poetic circles during his lifetime, and his poetry has continued to be popular without interruption until the present. His poetry was published posthumously by Juan Boscán in 1543, and it has been the subject of several annotated editions, the first and most famous of which appeared in 1574. Contents 1 Biography 2 Works 3 Literary references 4 Modern translations 5 Further reading 6 References 7 External links Biography[edit] Garcilaso was born in the Spanish city of Toledo between 1498 and 1503.[1] Clavería Boscán affirms he was born between 1487 and 1492,[2] and another sources affirms he was born in 1501.[3] His father Garcilaso de la Vega, the third son of Pedro Suárez de Figueroa, was a nobleman and ambassador in the royal court of the Catholic Monarchs.[4] His mother's name was Sancha de Guzmán.[5] Garcilaso was the second son which meant he did not receive the mayorazgo (entitlement) to his father's estate. However, he spent his younger years receiving an extensive education, mastered five languages (Spanish, Greek, Latin, Italian and French), and learned how to play the zither, lute and the harp. When his father died in 1509, Garcilaso received a sizeable inheritance. Cover of The works of Boscán and Garcilaso de la Vega in 4 books, 1543 After his schooling, he joined the military in hopes of joining the royal guard. He was named "contino" (imperial guard) of Charles V in 1520, and he was made a member of the Order of Santiago in 1523. There were a few women in the life of this poet. His first lover was Guiomar Carrillo, with whom he had a child. He had another suspected lover named Isabel Freire, who was a lady-in-waiting of Isabel of Portugal, but this is today regarded as mythical.[6] In 1525, Garcilaso married Elena de Zúñiga, who served as a lady-in-waiting for the King's favorite sister, Leonor. Their marriage took place in Garcilaso's hometown of Toledo in one of the family's estates. He had six children: Lorenzo, an illegitimate child with Guiomar Carrillo, Garcilaso, Íñigo de Zúñiga, Pedro de Guzmán, Sancha, and Francisco. Garcilaso's military career meant that he took part in the numerous battles and campaigns conducted by Charles V across Europe. His duties took him to Italy, Germany, Tunisia and France. In 1532 for a short period he was exiled to a Danube island where he was the guest of the Count György Cseszneky, royal court judge of Győr. Later in France, he would fight his last battle. The King desired to take control of Marseille and eventually control of the Mediterranean Sea, but this goal was never realized. Garcilaso de la Vega died on 14 October 1536 in Nice, after suffering 25 days from an injury sustained in a battle at Le Muy. His body was first buried in the Church of St. Dominic in Nice, but two years later his wife had his body moved to the Church of San Pedro Martir in Toledo. Works[edit] Garcilaso de la Vega is best known for his tragic love poetry that contrasts the playful poetry of his predecessors. He seemed to progress through three distinct episodes of his life which are reflected in his works. During his Spanish period, he wrote the majority of his eight-syllable poems; during his Italian or Petrarchan period, he wrote mostly sonnets and songs; and during his Neapolitan or classicist period, he wrote his other more classical poems, including his elegies, letters, eclogues and odes. Influenced by many Italian Renaissance poets, Garcilaso adapted the eleven-syllable line to the Spanish language in his sonetos (sonnets), mostly written in the 1520s, during his Petrarchan period. Increasing the number of syllables in the verse from eight to eleven allowed for greater flexibility. In addition to the sonetos, Garcilaso helped to introduce several other types of stanzas to the Spanish language. These include the estancia, formed by eleven- and seven-syllable lines; the "lira", formed by three seven-syllable and two eleven-syllable lines; and endecasílabos sueltos, formed by unrhymed eleven-syllable lines. Dramatized lecture of Garcilaso's Apollo and Daphne Throughout his life, Garcilaso de la Vega wrote various poems in each of these types. His works include: forty Sonetos (Sonnets), five Canciones (Songs), eight Coplas (Couplets), three Églogas (Eclogues), two Elegías (Elegies), and the Epístola a Boscán (Letter to Boscán). Allusions to classical myths and Greco-Latin figures, great musicality, alliteration, rhythm and an absence of religion characterize his poetry. It can be said that Spanish poetry was never the same after Garcilaso de la Vega. His works have influenced the majority of subsequent Spanish poets, including other major authors of the period like Jorge de Montemor, Luis de León, John of the Cross, Miguel de Cervantes, Lope de Vega, Luis de Góngora and Francisco Quevedo. For example: (égloga Tercera): Más a las veces son mejor oídos el puro ingenio y lengua casi muda, testigos limpios de ánimo inocente, que la curiosidad del elocuente. He was very good at transmitting the sense of life into writing, in many poems including his «dolorido sentir»: No me podrán quitar el dolorido sentir, si ya del todo primero no me quitan el sentido. We see the shift in traditional belief of Heaven as influenced by the Renaissance, which is called "neo-Platonism," which tried to lift love to a spiritual, idealistic plane, as compared to the traditional Catholic view of Heaven. (Égloga primera): Contigo mano a mano busquemos otros prados y otros ríos, otros valles floridos y sombríos, donde descanse, y siempre pueda verte ante los ojos míos, sin miedo y sobresalto de perderte. (Égloga primera) He has enjoyed a revival of influence among 21st century pastoral poets such as Seamus Heaney, Dennis Nurkse, and Giannina Braschi. Literary references[edit] Monument to Garcilaso in Toledo, Spain Garcilaso is mentioned in multiple works by Miguel de Cervantes. In the second volume of Don Quixote, the protagonist quotes one of the poet's sonnets.[7] In El licenciado Vidriera, Tomás Rodaja carries a volume of Garcilaso on his journey across Europe. The title of Pedro Salinas's sequence of poems La voz a ti debida is taken from Garcilaso's third eclogue. In the novel Of Love and Other Demons by Gabriel García Márquez, one of the main characters, Father Cayetano Delaura, is an admirer of Garcilaso de la Vega. In the novel, which takes place in 18th-century colonial Colombia, Delaura is forced to give up being a priest because of his tragic love affair. Puerto Rican poet Giannina Braschi wrote both a poetic treatise on Garcilaso de la Vega's Eclogues, as well as a book of poems in homage to the Spanish master, entitled Empire of Dreams. Modern translations[edit] The Odes and Sonnets of Garcilaso de la Vega, trans James Cleugh, (London: Aquila, 1930) Further reading[edit] Creel, Bryant. "Garcilaso de la Vega". Dictionary of Literary Biography, Volume 318: Sixteenth-Century Spanish Writers. A Bruccoli Clark Layman Book. Edited by Gregory B. Kaplan, University of Tennessee. Gale, 2005. pp. 62–82. Braschi, Giannina. “La metamorfosis del ingenio en la Egloga III de Garcilaso." Revista Canadiense de Estudios Hispanicos, 4.1, 1979. References[edit] ^ Vallvey, Angela (15 July 2015). El arte de amar la vida. Kailas Editorial. p. 49. ISBN 9788416023776. ^ Pérez López, José Luis (2000). "La fecha de nacimiento de Garcilaso de la Vega a la luz de un nuevo documento biográfico" (PDF). Criticón. Centro Virtual Cervantes. 78: 45–57. ISBN 84-690-3363-8. ISSN 0247-381X. ^ "Garcilaso de la Vega" (PDF). Consellería de Cultura, Educación e Ordenación Universitaria (in Spanish). Xunta de Galicia. Retrieved 10 August 2018. ^ Mazo Romero, Fernando. "Los Suárez de Figueroa y el señorío de Feria" (PDF) (in Spanish). Universidad de Sevilla: 113–164. Cite journal requires |journal= (help) ^ "Garcilaso de la Vega". Litoral. Revista Litoral S.A. (61/63): 63–67. 1976–1977. JSTOR 43398752. ^ Darst, David H. (1979). "Garcilaso´s Love for Isabel Freire: The Creation of a Myth". Journal of Hispanic Philology. 3: 261–268. ^ Herreid, Grant. "The Musical World of Don Quixote" (PDF). Retrieved October 16, 2017. External links[edit] Works by Garcilaso de la Vega at Project Gutenberg Works by or about Garcilaso de la Vega at Internet Archive Works by Garcilaso de la Vega at LibriVox (public domain audiobooks) Page about Garcilaso de la Vega "La Página de Garcilaso en Internet." 2006. La Asociación de Amigos de Garcilaso de la Vega (Toledo, España). (in Spanish) "Multiculturalism Gone Wrong: Spain in the Renaissance", Alix Ingber, (adapted from a lecture). . [Last updated: January 19, 1998]. "Spanish Literature (Archived 2009-11-01)," Microsoft Encarta Online Encyclopedia 2006. Authority control BNE: XX931941 BNF: cb11927820s (data) CANTIC: a10429098 CiNii: DA02158957 GND: 118716344 ICCU: IT\ICCU\CNCV\001220 ISNI: 0000 0001 2283 4303 LCCN: n80005055 LNB: 000164654 NKC: jn20000402501 NLI: 000613816 NLK: KAC201008761 NLP: A11837676 NSK: 000214451 NTA: 069396043 RERO: 02-A000069378 SELIBR: 237501 SNAC: w6gt6p91 SUDOC: 027179214 VcBA: 495/21238 VIAF: 100186624 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n80005055 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Garcilaso_de_la_Vega_(poet)&oldid=990908551" Categories: 1500s births 1536 deaths Military personnel killed in action People from Toledo, Spain Spanish poets Spanish soldiers 16th-century soldiers 16th-century Spanish poets 16th-century Spanish writers 16th-century male writers 16th-century Spanish military personnel Hidden categories: CS1 Spanish-language sources (es) CS1 errors: missing periodical Articles with short description Short description matches Wikidata Articles with Project Gutenberg links Articles with Internet Archive links Articles with LibriVox links Articles with Spanish-language sources (es) Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CANTIC identifiers Wikipedia articles with CINII identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ICCU identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with LNB identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLI identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLP identifiers Wikipedia articles with NSK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with RERO identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SNAC-ID identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Languages Afrikaans العربية Aragonés Azərbaycanca Български Bosanski Català Čeština Corsu Dansk Deutsch Eesti Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français Gaeilge Gàidhlig Galego 한국어 Hrvatski Italiano Latina Latviešu Lingua Franca Nova Magyar Malti Nederlands Polski Português Română Runa Simi Русский Simple English Slovenščina Српски / srpski Svenska Tagalog Türkçe اردو Winaray 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 27 November 2020, at 05:31 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2875 ---- View source for Template:Horace - Wikipedia View source for Template:Horace ← Template:Horace Jump to navigation Jump to search You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons: Your IP address is in a range that has been blocked on all Wikimedia Foundation wikis. The block was made by Jon Kolbert (meta.wikimedia.org). The reason given is Open Proxy: Webhost: Contact stewards if you are affected . Start of block: 20:12, 23 July 2019 Expiry of block: 20:12, 23 January 2022 Your current IP address is 40.76.139.33 and the blocked range is 40.76.0.0/16. Please include all above details in any queries you make. If you believe you were blocked by mistake, you can find additional information and instructions in the No open proxies global policy. Otherwise, to discuss the block please post a request for review on Meta-Wiki or send an email to the stewards OTRS queue at stewards@wikimedia.org including all above details. You are currently unable to edit Wikipedia due to a block affecting your IP address. This does not affect your ability to read Wikipedia pages. Most people who see this message have done nothing wrong. Some kinds of blocks restrict editing from specific service providers or telecom companies in response to recent abuse or vandalism, and affect other users who are unrelated to that abuse. See below if you do not believe you have done anything wrong. Editing from 40.76.0.0/16 has been blocked (disabled) by ‪SQL‬ for the following reason(s): The IP address that you are currently using has been blocked because it is believed to be a web host provider or colocation provider. To prevent abuse, web hosts and colocation providers may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You will not be able to edit Wikipedia using a web host or colocation provider because it hides your IP address, much like a proxy or VPN. We recommend that you attempt to use another connection to edit. For example, if you use a proxy or VPN to connect to the internet, turn it off when editing Wikipedia. If you edit using a mobile connection, try using a Wi-Fi connection, and vice versa. If you have a Wikipedia account, please log in. If you do not have any other way to edit Wikipedia, you will need to request an IP block exemption. If you are confident that you are not using a web host, you may appeal this block by adding the following text on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is _______. Place any further information here. ~~~~}}. You must fill in the blank with your IP address for this block to be investigated. Your IP address can be determined here. Alternatively, if you wish to keep your IP address private you can use the unblock ticket request system. There are several reasons you might be editing using the IP address of a web host or colocation provider (such as if you are using VPN software or a business network); please use this method of appeal only if you think your IP address is in fact not a web host or colocation provider. Administrators: The IP block exemption user right should only be applied to allow users to edit using web host in exceptional circumstances, and requests should usually be directed to the functionaries team via email. If you intend to give the IPBE user right, a CheckUser needs to take a look at the account. This can be requested most easily at SPI Quick Checkuser Requests. Unblocking an IP or IP range with this template is highly discouraged without at least contacting the blocking administrator. This block has been set to expire: 16:25, 2 June 2023. Even when blocked, you will usually still be able to edit your user talk page and email other editors and administrators. For information on how to proceed, first see the FAQ for blocked users and the guideline on block appeals. The guide to appealing blocks may also be helpful. Other useful links: Blocking policy · Help:I have been blocked You can view and copy the source of this page: {{Navbox | name = Horace | state = {{{state|autocollapse}}} | title = Works by [[Horace]] | listclass = hlist | group1 = Poetry | list1= * ''[[Satires (Horace)|Satires]]'' * ''[[Epodes (Horace)|Epodes]]'' * ''[[Odes (Horace)|Odes]]'' * ''[[Epistles (Horace)|Epistles]]'' * ''[[Carmen Saeculare]]'' * ''[[Ars Poetica (Horace)|Ars Poetica]]'' | group2 = Collections | list2= *''[[Satires 2.5 (Horace)|Satires 2.5]]'' | group3 = Quote | list3= *''[[Ut pictura poesis]]'' | group4 = Related | list4= *[[Spring of Bandusium]] }} {{collapsible option}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Horace}} [[Category:Ancient Roman writer navigational boxes]] [[Category:Poet navigational boxes]] Pages transcluded onto the current version of this page (help): Template:Big (view source) (template editor protected) Template:Collapsible option (view source) (template editor protected) Template:Navbox (view source) (template editor protected) Template:Para (view source) (template editor protected) Template:Template other (view source) (protected) Template:Tlx (view source) (protected) Module:Arguments (view source) (protected) Module:Color contrast (view source) (template editor protected) Module:Color contrast/colors (view source) (template editor protected) Module:Navbar (view source) (protected) Module:Navbox (view source) (template editor protected) Return to Template:Horace. Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Horace" Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Template Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Page information Wikidata item Languages Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2897 ---- Lactantius - Wikipedia Lactantius From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Early Christian author For the 4th-century author, see Lactantius Placidus. Mural likely depicting Lactantius. Lucius Caecilius Firmianus Lactantius (c. 250 – c. 325) was an early Christian author who became an advisor to the first Christian Roman emperor, Constantine I, guiding his religious policy as it developed,[1] and a tutor to his son Crispus. His most important work is the Institutiones Divinae ("The Divine Institutes"), an apologetic treatise intended to establish the reasonableness and truth of Christianity to pagan critics. He is best known for his apologetic works, widely read during the Renaissance by humanists who called Lactantius the "Christian Cicero". Also widely attributed to Lactantius is the poem The Phoenix, which is based on the myth of the phoenix from Oriental mythology. Though the poem is not clearly Christian in its motifs, modern scholars have found some literary evidence in the text to suggest the author had a Christian interpretation of the eastern myth as a symbol of resurrection.[2] Contents 1 Biography 2 Writing 3 Prophetic exegesis 4 Works 5 See also 6 References 7 Sources 8 External links Biography[edit] Lactantius, a Latin-speaking North African of Berber origin,[3][4][5][6] was not born into a Christian family. He was a pupil of Arnobius who taught at Sicca Veneria, an important city in Numidia. In his early life, he taught rhetoric in his native town, which may have been Cirta in Numidia, where an inscription mentions a certain "L. Caecilius Firmianus".[7] Lactantius had a successful public career at first. At the request of the Roman Emperor Diocletian, he became an official professor of rhetoric in Nicomedia; the voyage from Africa is described in his poem Hodoeporicum (now lost[8]). There, he associated in the imperial circle with the administrator and polemicist Sossianus Hierocles and the pagan philosopher Porphyry; he first met Constantine, and Galerius, whom he cast as villain in the persecutions.[9] Having converted to Christianity, he resigned his post[10] before Diocletian's purging of Christians from his immediate staff and before the publication of Diocletian's first "Edict against the Christians" (February 24, 303).[11] As a Latin rhetor in a Greek city, he subsequently lived in poverty according to Saint Jerome and eked out a living by writing until Constantine I became his patron. The persecution forced him to leave Nicomedia, perhaps re-locating to North Africa. The Emperor Constantine appointed the elderly Lactantius Latin tutor to his son Crispus in 309-310 who was probably 10-15 years old at the time.[12] Lactantius followed Crispus to Trier in 317, when Crispus was made Caesar (lesser co-emperor) and sent to the city. Crispus was put to death by order of his father Constantine I in 326, but when Lactantius died and under what circumstances are unknown.[13] Writing[edit] Like so many of the early Christian authors, Lactantius depended on classical models. The early humanists called him the "Christian Cicero" (Cicero Christianus).[13] A translator of the Divine Institutes wrote: "Lactantius has always held a very high place among the Christian Fathers, not only on account of the subject-matter of his writings, but also on account of the varied erudition, the sweetness of expression, and the grace and elegance of style, by which they are characterized."[14] He wrote apologetic works explaining Christianity in terms that would be palatable to educated people who still practiced the traditional religions of the Empire. He defended Christian beliefs against the criticisms of Hellenistic philosophers. His Divinae Institutiones ("Divine Institutes") were an early example of a systematic presentation of Christian thought. He was considered somewhat heretical after his death, but Renaissance humanists took a renewed interest in him, more for his elaborately rhetorical Latin style than for his theology. His works were copied in manuscript several times in the 15th century and were first printed in 1465 by the Germans Arnold Pannartz and Konrad Sweynheim at the Abbey of Subiaco. This edition was the first book printed in Italy to have a date of printing, as well as the first use of a Greek alphabet font anywhere, which was apparently produced in the course of printing, as the early pages leave Greek text blank. It was probably the fourth book ever printed in Italy. A copy of this edition was sold at auction in 2000 for more than $1 million.[15] Prophetic exegesis[edit] Beginning of Lactantius’ Divinae institutiones in a Renaissance manuscript written in Florence ca. 1420–1430 by Guglielmino Tanaglia Like many writers in the first few centuries of the early church, Lactantius took a premillennialist view, holding that the second coming of Christ will precede a millennium or a thousand-year reign of Christ on earth. According to Charles E. Hill, "With Lactantius in the early fourth century we see a determined attempt to revive a more “genuine” form of chiliasm."[16] Lactantius quoted the Sibyls extensively (although the Sibylline Oracles are now considered to be pseudepigrapha). Book VII of The Divine Institutes indicates a familiarity with Jewish, Christian, Egyptian and Iranian apocalyptic material.[17] None of the fathers thus far had been more verbose on the subject of the millennial kingdom than Lactantius or more particular in describing the times and events preceding and following. He held to the literalist interpretation of the millennium, that the millennium originates with the second advent of Christ and marks the destruction of the wicked, the binding of the devil and the raising of the righteous dead.[18] He depicted Jesus reigning with the resurrected righteous on this earth during the seventh thousand years prior to the general judgment. In the end, the devil, having been bound during the thousand years, is loosed; the enslaved nations rebel against the righteous, who hide underground until the hosts, attacking the Holy City, are overwhelmed by fire and brimstone and mutual slaughter and buried altogether by an earthquake: rather unnecessarily, it would seem, since the wicked are thereupon raised again to be sent into eternal punishment. Next, God renews the earth, after the punishment of the wicked, and the Lord alone is thenceforth worshiped in the renovated earth.[19] Lactantius confidently stated that the beginning of the end would be the fall, or breakup, of the Roman Empire.[20] However, this view fell out of favor with the conversion of Constantine and the improved lot of Christians: "Many Christians felt that any expectation of the downfall of the empire was as disloyal to God as it was to Rome."[17] Attempts to determine the time of the End were viewed as in contradiction to Acts 1:7: "It is not for you to know the times or seasons that the Father has established by his own authority,"[17] and Mark 13:32: "But of that day or hour, no one knows, neither the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father." Works[edit] De opificio Dei ("The Works of God"), an apologetic work, written in 303 or 304 during Diocletian's persecution and dedicated to a former pupil, a rich Christian named Demetrianius. The apologetic principles underlying all the works of Lactantius are well set forth in this treatise.[13] Institutiones Divinae ("The Divine Institutes"), written between 303 and 311.[13] This is the most important of the writings of Lactantius. It was "one of the first books printed in Italy and the first dated Italian imprint."[21] As an apologetic treatise, it was intended to point out the futility of pagan beliefs and to establish the reasonableness and truth of Christianity as a response to pagan critics. It was also the first attempt at a systematic exposition of Christian theology in Latin and was planned on a scale sufficiently broad to silence all opponents.[22] Patrick Healy notes, "The strengths and the weakness of Lactantius are nowhere better shown than in his work. The beauty of the style, the choice and aptness of the terminology, cannot hide the author's lack of grasp on Christian principles and his almost utter ignorance of Scripture."[13] Included in this treatise is a quote from the nineteenth of the Odes of Solomon, one of only two known texts of the Odes until the early twentieth century.[23] However, his mockery of the idea of a round earth[24] was criticised by Copernicus as "childish".[25] Page from the Opera, a manuscript from 1465, featuring various colours of pen-work An Epitome of the Divine institutes is a summary treatment of the subject.[14] De ira Dei ("On the Wrath of God" or "On the Anger of God"), directed against the Stoics and Epicureans.[14] De mortibus persecutorum ("On the Deaths of the Persecutors") has an apologetic character but has been treated as a work of history by Christian writers. The point of the work is to describe the deaths of the persecutors of Christians before Lactantius (Nero, Domitian, Decius, Valerian, Aurelian) and the contemporaries of Lactantius himself: Diocletian, Maximian, Galerius, Maximinus. This work is taken as a chronicle of the last and greatest of the persecutions in spite of the moral point that each anecdote has been arranged to tell. Here, Lactantius preserves the story of Constantine's vision of the Chi Rho before his conversion to Christianity. The full text is found in only one manuscript, which bears the title Lucii Caecilii liber ad Donatum Confessorem de Mortibus Persecutorum.[13] Widely attributed to Lactantius although it shows only cryptic signs of Christianity, the poem The Phoenix (de Ave Phoenice) tells the story of the death and rebirth of that mythical bird. That poem in turn appears to have been the principal source for the famous Old English poem to which the modern title The Phoenix is given. Opera ("Works") A second edition printed in the monastery at Subiaco, Lazio, is still extant. It remained in Italy until the late eighteenth century, when it was known to be in the library of Prince Vincenzo Maria Carafa in Messina. The Bodleian Library in Oxford, England, acquired this volume in 1817.[26] See also[edit] Problem of evil References[edit] ^ His role is examined in detail in Elizabeth DePalma Digeser, The Making of a Christian Empire: Lactantius and Rome, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2000. ^ White, Carolinne. Early Christian Latin Poets. ^ Serralda, Vincent; Huard, André (1984). Le Berbère-- lumière de l'Occident (in French). Nouvelles Editions Latines. p. 56. ISBN 9782723302395. ^ Annales de la Société d'histoire et d'archéologie de l'arrondissement de Saint-Malo (in French). 1957. p. 83. ^ Manceron, Gilles; Aïssani, Farid (1996). Algérie: comprendre la crise (in French). Editions Complexe. p. 161. ISBN 9782870276617. ^ Dérives (in French). 1985. p. 15. ^ Harnack, Chronologie d. altchr. Lit., II,416 ^ Conte, Gian Biagio (1999). Latin Literature: A History. Baltimore: JHU Press. p. 640. ISBN 0-8018-6253-1. Retrieved August 29, 2016. ^ Paul Stephenson, Constantine, Roman Emperor, Christian Victor, 2010:104. ^ Encyclopædia Britannica. 7 (15th ed.). 1993. ^ Stephenson 2010:106. ^ Barnes, Timothy, Constantine: Dynasty, Religion and Power in the Later Roman Empire, 2011, p. 177-8. ^ a b c d e f  One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Healy, Patrick (1910). "Lucius Caecilius Firmianus Lactantius". In Herbermann, Charles (ed.). Catholic Encyclopedia. 8. New York: Robert Appleton Company. Retrieved 26 February 2016. ^ a b c W. Fletcher (1871). The Works of Lactantius. ^ "Lot 65 Sale 6417 LACTANTIUS, Lucius Coelius Firmianus (c. 240–c. 320). Opera". Retrieved 2010-12-29. ^ Hill, Charles E., "Why the Early Church Finally Rejected Premillennialism", Modern Reformation, Jan/Feb 1996, p. 16 ^ a b c McGinn, Bernard. Visions of the End, Columbia University Press, 1998 ISBN 9780231112574 ^ Froom 1950, pp. 357-358. ^ Froom 1950, pp. 358. ^ Froom 1950, pp. 356-357. ^ "The Rubrics of the First Book of Lactantius Firmianus's On the Divine Institutes Against the Pagans Begin". World Digital Library. 2011-10-17. Retrieved 2014-03-01. ^ Lactantius The Divine Institutes, translated by Mary Francis McDonald Catholic University of America Press (1964) ^ Charlesworth, James Hamilton. The Odes of Solomon. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1973, pp. 1, 82 ^ Lactantius, Divine Institutes, Book III Chapter XXIV ^ Nicholas Copernicus (1543), The Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres ^ Polonsky Foundation Digitization Project: full scan of Lucius Coelius Firmianus Lactantius, Opera Archived 2016-03-04 at the Wayback Machine hosted by the Bodleian Libraries (bodleian.ox.ac.uk) Provenance information: http://incunables.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/record/L-002 Accessed 13 July 2015. Sources[edit] Froom, LeRoy (1950). The Prophetic Faith of our Fathers. 1. Archived from the original (DjVu and PDF) on 2014-11-06. Retrieved 2014-03-05. External links[edit] Wikiquote has quotations related to: Lactantius Wikimedia Commons has media related to Lucius Caecilius Firmianus Lactantius. Lactantius: links to primary texts and secondary sources Lactantius: text, concordances and frequency list Opera Omnia Bibliography of Lactantius: compiled by Jackson Bryce Lactantius, The Divine Institutes v t e Social and political philosophy Ancient philosophers Aristotle Chanakya Cicero Confucius Han Fei Lactantius Laozi Mencius Mozi Origen Plato Polybius Shang Socrates Sun Tzu Tertullian Thucydides Valluvar Xenophon Xunzi Medieval philosophers Alpharabius Augustine Averroes Baldus Bartolus Bruni Dante Gelasius al-Ghazali Giles Hostiensis Ibn Khaldun John of Paris John of Salisbury Latini Maimonides Marsilius Nizam al-Mulk Photios Thomas Aquinas Wang William of Ockham Early modern philosophers Beza Bodin Bossuet Botero Buchanan Calvin Cumberland Duplessis-Mornay Erasmus Filmer Grotius Guicciardini Harrington Hayashi Hobbes Hotman Huang Leibniz Locke Luther Machiavelli Malebranche Mariana Milton Montaigne More Müntzer Naudé Pufendorf Rohan Sansovino Sidney Spinoza Suárez 18th–19th-century philosophers Bakunin Bentham Bonald Bosanquet Burke Comte Constant Emerson Engels Fichte Fourier Franklin Godwin Hamann Hegel Herder Hume Jefferson Justi Kant political philosophy Kierkegaard Le Bon Le Play Madison Maistre Marx Mazzini Mill Montesquieu Möser Nietzsche Novalis Paine Renan Rousseau Royce Sade Schiller Smith Spencer Stirner Taine Thoreau Tocqueville Vico Vivekananda Voltaire 20th–21st-century philosophers Adorno Ambedkar Arendt Aurobindo Aron Azurmendi Badiou Baudrillard Bauman Benoist Berlin Bernstein Butler Camus Chomsky De Beauvoir Debord Du Bois Durkheim Dworkin Foucault Gandhi Gauthier Gehlen Gentile Gramsci Habermas Hayek Heidegger Irigaray Kautsky Kirk Kropotkin Laclau Lenin Luxemburg Mao Mansfield Marcuse Maritain Michels Mises Mou Mouffe Negri Niebuhr Nozick Nursî Oakeshott Ortega Pareto Pettit Plamenatz Polanyi Popper Qutb Radhakrishnan Rand Rawls Rothbard Russell Santayana Sartre Scanlon Schmitt Searle Shariati Simmel Simonović Skinner Sombart Sorel Spann Spirito Strauss Sun Taylor Walzer Weber Žižek Social theories Anarchism Authoritarianism Collectivism Communism Communitarianism Conflict theories Confucianism Consensus theory Conservatism Contractualism Cosmopolitanism Culturalism Fascism Feminist political theory Gandhism Individualism Islam Islamism Legalism Liberalism Libertarianism Mohism National liberalism Republicanism Social constructionism Social constructivism Social Darwinism Social determinism Socialism Utilitarianism Concepts Civil disobedience Democracy Four occupations Justice Law Mandate of Heaven Peace Property Revolution Rights Social contract Society War more... Related articles Jurisprudence Philosophy and economics Philosophy of education Philosophy of history Philosophy of love Philosophy of sex Philosophy of social science Political ethics Social epistemology Category Authority control BIBSYS: 90084219 BNE: XX980172 BNF: cb119105531 (data) CANTIC: a10489654 CiNii: DA02052887 GND: 118725831 ISNI: 0000 0001 2242 4339 LCCN: n50041328 LNB: 000087840 NKC: ola2002158755 NLA: 35287525 NLG: 92818 NSK: 000084540 NTA: 068978294 RERO: 02-A000101912 SELIBR: 213336 SNAC: w6vq4d3n SUDOC: 026959348 Trove: 898421 ULAN: 500110878 VcBA: 495/30536 VIAF: 100198064 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n50041328 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lactantius&oldid=996505413" Categories: 250s births 325 deaths 4th-century Berber people Converts to Christianity from pagan religions Ancient Roman writers Post–Silver Age Latin writers 3rd-century Romans 4th-century Romans Christian writers Christian apologists 3rd-century Christian theologians 3rd-century Latin writers 4th-century Latin writers Berber Christians Christianity in Algeria Caecilii Church Fathers Berber writers Flat Earth proponents Hidden categories: CS1 French-language sources (fr) Articles incorporating a citation from the 1913 Catholic Encyclopedia without Wikisource reference Articles incorporating text from the 1913 Catholic Encyclopedia without Wikisource reference Webarchive template wayback links Articles with short description Short description matches Wikidata Commons category link is on Wikidata Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CANTIC identifiers Wikipedia articles with CINII identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with LNB identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLG identifiers Wikipedia articles with NSK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with RERO identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SNAC-ID identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with Trove identifiers Wikipedia articles with ULAN identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikiquote Wikisource Languages العربية Asturianu Azərbaycanca Български Català Čeština Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français Frysk Galego 한국어 Հայերեն Hrvatski Bahasa Indonesia Italiano Latina Lietuvių Magyar Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Polski Português Русский Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Türkçe Українська 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 27 December 2020, at 00:36 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2901 ---- Juvenal - Wikipedia Juvenal From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search For other uses, see Juvenal (disambiguation). ancient Roman poet This article includes a list of general references, but it remains largely unverified because it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (February 2011) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) Juvenal Frontispiece from John Dryden, The Satires of Decimus Junius Juvenalis: And of Aulus Persius Flaccus Born 1st century AD Aquinum (modern Aquino) Died 2nd century AD Occupation Poet Nationality Roman Genre Satire Decimus Junius Juvenalis (Latin: [ˈdɛkɪmʊs ˈjuːnɪ.ʊs jʊwɛˈnaːlɪs]), known in English as Juvenal (/ˈdʒuːvənəl/ JOO-vən-əl), was a Roman poet active in the late first and early second century AD. He is the author of the collection of satirical poems known as the Satires. The details of the author's life are unclear, although references within his text to known persons of the late first and early second centuries AD fix his earliest date of composition. One recent scholar argues that his first book was published in 100 or 101.[1] Because of a reference to a recent political figure, his fifth and final surviving book must date from after 127. Juvenal wrote at least 16 poems in the verse form dactylic hexameter. These poems cover a range of Roman topics. This follows Lucilius—the originator of the Roman satire genre, and it fits within a poetic tradition that also includes Horace and Persius. The Satires are a vital source for the study of ancient Rome from a number of perspectives, although their comic mode of expression makes it problematic to accept the content as strictly factual. At first glance the Satires could be read as a critique of pagan Rome. That critique may have ensured their survival in the Christian monastic scriptoria although the majority of ancient texts did not survive.[further explanation needed] Contents 1 Life 2 The Satires and their genre 3 Modern criticism and historical context of the Satires 4 Literary and cultural influence 5 See also 6 Notes 7 References 8 External links Life[edit] Juvenal, S. H. Gimber, 1837 Details of the author's life cannot be reconstructed definitively. The Vita Iuvenalis (Life of Juvenal), a biography of the author that became associated with his manuscripts no later than the tenth century, is little more than an extrapolation from the Satires. Traditional biographies, including the Vita Iuvenalis, give us the writer's full name and also tell us that he was either the son, or adopted son, of a rich freedman. He is supposed to have been a pupil of Quintilian, and to have practised rhetoric until he was middle-aged, both as amusement and for legal purposes. The Satires do make frequent and accurate references to the operation of the Roman legal system. His career as a satirist is supposed to have begun at a fairly late stage in his life. Biographies agree in giving his birthplace as the Volscian town of Aquinum[2] and also, in allotting to his life a period of exile, which supposedly was due to his insulting an actor who had high levels of court influence. The emperor who is said to have banished him is given variously, as either Trajan or Domitian. A preponderance of the biographies place his exile in Egypt, with the exception of one, that opts for Scotland.[3] Only one of these traditional biographies supplies a date of birth for Juvenal: it gives 55 AD, which most probably is speculation, but accords reasonably well with the rest of the evidence. Other traditions have him surviving for some time past the year of Hadrian's death (138 AD). Some sources place his death in exile, others have him being recalled to Rome (the latter of which is considered more plausible by contemporary scholars). If he was exiled by Domitian, then it is possible that he was one of the political exiles recalled during the brief reign of Nerva.[3] It is impossible to tell how much of the content of these traditional biographies is fiction and how much is fact. Large parts clearly are mere deduction from Juvenal's writings, but some elements appear more substantial. Juvenal never mentions a period of exile in his life, yet it appears in every extant traditional biography. Many scholars think the idea to be a later invention; the Satires do display some knowledge of Egypt and Britain, and it is thought that this gave rise to the tradition that Juvenal was exiled. Others, however - particularly Gilbert Highet - regard the exile as factual, and these scholars also supply a concrete date for the exile: 93 AD until 96, when Nerva became emperor. They argue that a reference to Juvenal in one of Martial's poems, which is dated to 92, is impossible if, at this stage Juvenal was already in exile, or, had served his time in exile, since in that case, Martial would not have wished to antagonise Domitian by mentioning such a persona non grata as Juvenal. If Juvenal was exiled, he would have lost his patrimony, and this may explain the consistent descriptions of the life of the client he bemoans in the Satires. The only other biographical evidence available is a dedicatory inscription said to have been found at Aquinum in the nineteenth century, which consists of the following text:[4] ...]RI·SACRVM ...]NIVS·IVVENALIS ...] COH·[.]·DELMATARVM II·VIR·QVINQ·FLAMEN DIVI·VESPASIANI VOVIT·DEDICAV[...]UE SVA PEC [CERE]RI·SACRVM [D(ECIMVS) IV]NIVS·IVVENALIS [TRIB(VNVS)] COH(ORTIS)·[I]·DELMATARVM II·VIR·QVINQ(VENNALIS)·FLAMEN DIVI·VESPASIANI VOVIT·DEDICAV[ITQ]VE SVA PEC(VNIA) To Ceres (this) sacred (thing) (Decimus Junius?) Juvenalis military tribune of the first cohort of the Dalmatian[2] (legions) Duovir, Quinquennalis, Flamen of the Divine Vespasian vowed and dedicated at his own expense (Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum X.5382) Scholars usually are of the opinion that this inscription does not relate to the poet: a military career would not fit well with the pronounced anti-militarism of the Satires and, moreover, the Dalmatian legions do not seem to have existed prior to 166 AD. Therefore, it seems likely that this reference is to a Juvenal who was a later relative of the poet, however, as they both came from Aquinum and were associated with the goddess Ceres (the only deity the Satires shows much respect for). If the theory that connects these two Juvenals is correct, then the inscription does show that Juvenal's family was reasonably wealthy, and that, if the poet really was the son of a foreign freedman, then his descendants assimilated into the Roman class structure more quickly than typical. Green thinks it more likely that the tradition of the freedman father is false and, that Juvenal's ancestors had been minor nobility of Roman Italy of relatively ancient descent.[5] The Satires and their genre[edit] Main article: Satires (Juvenal) Saturae, 1535 Juvenal is credited with sixteen known poems divided among five books; all are in the Roman genre of satire, which, at its most basic in the time of the author, comprised a wide-ranging discussion of society and social mores in dactylic hexameter.[6] In Satire I, concerning the scope and content of his work, Juvenal says: ex quo Deucalion nimbis tollentibus aequor nauigio montem ascendit sortesque poposcit paulatimque anima caluerunt mollia saxa et maribus nudas ostendit Pyrrha puellas, quidquid agunt homines, uotum, timor, ira, uoluptas, gaudia, discursus, nostri farrago libelli est. Back from when Deucalion climbed a mountain in a boat as the clouds lifted the waters, and then asked for an oracle, and then little by little spirit warmed the soft stones and Pyrrha showed naked girls to their husbands, whatever men do—prayer, fear, rage, pleasure, joy, running about—is the gist of my little book. —(1.81–86) Juvenal claims as his purview, the entire gamut of human experience since the dawn of history. Quintilian—in the context of a discussion of literary genres appropriate for an oratorical education—claimed that, unlike so many literary and artistic forms adopted from Greek models, “satire at least is all ours” (satura quidem tota nostra est).[7] At least in the view of Quintillian, earlier Greek satiric verse (e.g. that of Hipponax) or even Latin satiric prose (e.g. that of Petronius) did not constitute satura, per se. Roman Satura was a formal literary genre rather than being simply clever, humorous critique in no particular format. Book I: Satires 1–5 Book II: Satire 6 Book III: Satires 7–9 Book IV: Satires 10–12 Book V: Satires 13–16 (although Satire 16 is incomplete) The individual Satires (excluding Satire 16) range in length from 130 (Satire 12) to c. 695 (Satire 6) lines. The poems are not entitled individually, but translators often have added titles for the convenience of readers. Modern criticism and historical context of the Satires[edit] While Juvenal's mode of satire has been noted from antiquity for its wrathful scorn toward all representatives of social deviance, some politically progressive scholars such as, W. S. Anderson and later S. M. Braund, have attempted to defend his work as that of a rhetorical persona (mask), taken up by the author to critique the very attitudes he appears to be exhibiting in his works.[8] In any case it would be an error to read the Satires as a literal account of normal Roman life and thought in the late first and early second centuries AD, just as it would be an error to give credence to every slander recorded in Suetonius against the members of prior imperial dynasties. Themes similar to those of the Satires are present in authors spanning the period of the late Roman Republic and early empire ranging from Cicero and Catullus to Martial and Tacitus; similarly, the stylistics of Juvenal's text fall within the range of post-Augustan literature, as represented by Persius, Statius, and Petronius.[9] Juvenal's Satires, giving several accounts of Jewish life in first-century Rome, have been regarded by scholars, such as J. Juster and, more recently, Peter Nahon, as a valuable source about early Judaism.[10] Literary and cultural influence[edit] The Satires have inspired many authors, including Samuel Johnson, who modeled his “London” on Satire III and “The Vanity of Human Wishes” on Satire X. Alexander Theroux, whose novels are rife with vicious satire, identified Juvenal as his most important influence.[11] Juvenal also provided a source for the name for a forensically important beetle, Histeridae. Juvenal is the source of many well-known maxims, including: that the common people—rather than caring about their freedom—are only interested in “bread and circuses” (panem et circenses 10.81; i.e. food and entertainment), that—rather than for wealth, power, eloquence, or children—one should pray for a “sound mind in a sound body” (mens sana in corpore sano 10.356), that a perfect wife is a “rare bird” (rara avis in terris nigroque simillima cycno 6.165; a rare bird in the earth and most similar to a black swan)[12] that "honesty is praised and left out in the cold" Probitas laudatur et alget (I, line 74). and the troubling question of who can be trusted with power—“who will watch the watchers?” or "who will guard the guardians themselves?" (quis custodiet ipsos custodes 6.347–48). ASICS, the footwear and sports equipment manufacturing company, is named after the acronym of the Latin phrase "anima sana in corpore sano" (a sound mind in a sound body) from Satire X by Juvenal (10.356).[13] In his autobiography, the German writer Heinrich Böll notes that in the high school he attended when growing up under Nazi rule, an anti-Nazi teacher paid special attention to Juvenal: "Mr. Bauer realized how topical Juvenal was, how he dealt at length with such phenomena as arbitrary government, tyranny, corruption, the degradation of public morals, the decline of the Republican ideal and the terrorizing acts of the Praetorian Guards. (...) In a second-hand bookshop I found an 1838 translation of Juvenal with an extensive commentary, twice the length of the translated text itself, written at the height of the Romantic period. Though its price was more than I could really afford, I bought it. I read all of it very intensely, as if it was a detective novel. It was one of the few books to which I persistently held on throughout the war (WWII) and beyond, even when most of my other books were lost or sold on the black market".[14] See also[edit] Ancient Rome portal Literature portal Junia (gens) Panem et circenses Satires (Juvenal) Satire VI Notes[edit] ^ Uden, J. The Invisible Satirist: Juvenal and Second-Century Rome (Oxford, 2015), pp. 219–226 ^ a b Sellar, William; Postgate, John (1911). "Juvenal" . In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. 15 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 610–613. ^ a b Peter Green: Introduction to Penguin Classics edition of the Satires, 1998 edition: pp. 15 ff ^ (From L to R: the inscription as preserved, the restored inscription, and the translation of the restored inscription.) ^ Peter Green: Introduction to Penguin Classics edition of the Satires, 1998 edition: pp. 23–24 ^ Lucilius experimented with other meters before settling on dactylic hexameter. ^ Quintilian (10 January 95). Institutio Oratoria. Check date values in: |date= (help) ^ According to Braund (1988 p. 25), Satire 7 – the opening poem of Book III – represents a “break” with satires one through six – Books I and II – where Juvenal relinquishes the indignatio of the “angry persona” in favor of the irony of a “much more rational and intelligent” persona. ^ Amy Richlin identifies oratorical invective as a source for both satire and epigram. 1992 p. 127. ^ Peter Nahon, 2014. Idées neuves sur un vieux texte : Juvénal, Saturae, 6, 542–547. In: Revue des études latines 92:1–6 ^ "Theroux Metaphrastes: An Essay on Literature," in Three Wogs (Boston: David Godine, 195), p. 23. ^ Though in fact the description of a good wife as rara avis is not Juvenal's coining but dates back to Seneca de Matr. 56. (Ferguson (1979) Juvenal: The Satires, on line 6.165). ^ "About ASICS". ASICS America. Retrieved 2015-08-31. ^ Heinrich Boll, "What will become of this kid? Or: About Books", Ch, 17 References[edit] Anderson, William S. (1982) Essays on Roman Satire, Princeton: Princeton University Press. Braund, Susanna M. (1988) Beyond Anger: A Study of Juvenal’s Third Book of Satires, Cambridge: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge. Braund, Susanna (1996) Juvenal Satires Book I, Cambridge: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge. Braund, Susanna (1996) The Roman Satirists and their Masks, London: Bristol Classical Press. Courtney, E. (1980) A Commentary of the Satires of Juvenal, London: Athlone Press. Edwards, Catherine (1993) The Politics of Immorality in Ancient Rome, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Gleason, Maud W. (1995) Making Men: Sophists and Self-Presentation in Ancient Rome, Princeton: Princeton University Press. Gowers, Emily (1993) The Loaded Table: Representations of Food in Roman Literature, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Green, Peter (1989). "Juvenal Revisited". Grand Street, Vol. 9, No. 1 (Autumn, 1989), pp. 175–196. Green, Peter (trans.) (1998): Juvenal. The Sixteen Satires. London: Penguin Books. (3rd revised edn; first edn published 1967). Highet, Gilbert (1961) Juvenal the Satirist, New York: Oxford University Press. Juvenal (1992) The Satires, Trans. Niall Rudd, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Juvenal (1992) Persi et Juvenalis Saturae, ed. W. V. Clausen. London: Oxford University Press. Kelk, Christopher (2010), The Satires of Juvenal: A Verse Translation, Edwin Mellen Press. Macleane, Arthur J. (1867). Decii Junii Juvenalis et A. Persii Flacci Satirae. With a commentary. The Oxford Classical Dictionary 3rd ed., 1996, New York: Oxford University Press. Richlin, Amy (1992) The Garden of Priapus, New York : Oxford University Press. Rudd, Niall (1982) Themes in Roman Satire, Los Angeles: University of California Press. Rudd, Niall (tr.) (1991): Juvenal Juvenal: The Satires, with an Introduction and Notes by William Barr. Oxford. Syme, Ronald (1939) The Roman Revolution, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Uden, James (2015) The Invisible Satirist: Juvenal and Second-Century Rome. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Stramaglia, Antonio; Grazzini, Stefano; Dimatteo, Giuseppe (2015): Giovenale tra storia, poesia e ideologia, Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. External links[edit] Wikisource has original works written by or about: Juvenal Wikiquote has quotations related to: Juvenal Library resources about Juvenal Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries By Juvenal Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries Latin text of The Satires of Juvenal at The Latin Library English translations of all 16 satires at the Tertullian Project. Together with a survey of the manuscript transmission. Works by Juvenal at Perseus Digital Library English translations of Satires 1, 2, 3, 6, 8 and 9 Juvenal's first 3 "Satires" in English SORGLL: Juvenal, Satire I.1–30, read by Mark Miner Lessons From Juvenal Works by or about Juvenal at Internet Archive Works by Juvenal at LibriVox (public domain audiobooks) Juvenal and Persius, G. G. Ramsay (ed.), Loeb, London: William Heinemann, New York: G. P. Putnam's sons, 1928. v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films Authority control BIBSYS: 90071358 BNC: 000035932 BNE: XX1021924 BNF: cb11909281d (data) CANTIC: a1995590x CiNii: DA02754636 GND: 118556126 ICCU: IT\ICCU\CFIV\004507 ISNI: 0000 0001 2144 1081 LCCN: n79060985 LNB: 000229559 NDL: 00514170 NKC: jn19981001529 NLA: 35256484 NLI: 000072695 NLP: A12091868 NSK: 000084536 NTA: 068845723 RERO: 02-A000096291 SELIBR: 192069 SUDOC: 026943719 Trove: 884801 VcBA: 495/16583 VIAF: 83985148 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n79060985 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Juvenal&oldid=995750662" Categories: Junii 1st-century births 2nd-century deaths 1st-century Romans 2nd-century Romans 1st-century writers 2nd-century writers Ancient Romans in Britain Latin-language writers Ancient Roman writers Roman-era satirists Silver Age Latin writers People from the Province of Frosinone Hidden categories: Articles containing Latin-language text Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica with Wikisource reference CS1 errors: dates Articles with short description Short description matches Wikidata Articles lacking in-text citations from February 2011 All articles lacking in-text citations Wikipedia articles needing clarification from December 2017 Articles with Internet Archive links Articles with LibriVox links Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNC identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNE identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CANTIC identifiers Wikipedia articles with CINII identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ICCU identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with LNB identifiers Wikipedia articles with NDL identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLI identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLP identifiers Wikipedia articles with NSK identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with RERO identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with Trove identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikiquote Wikisource Languages Afrikaans العربية Aragonés Asturianu تۆرکجه Bân-lâm-gú Беларуская Български Brezhoneg Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Estremeñu Euskara فارسی Français 한국어 Հայերեն Ido Íslenska Italiano עברית ქართული Latina Magyar Македонски Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Polski Português Română Русский Scots Sicilianu Slovenčina Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Tagalog Türkçe Українська 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 22 December 2020, at 18:16 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2907 ---- Russian State Library - Wikipedia Russian State Library From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia   (Redirected from RSL (identifier)) Jump to navigation Jump to search Not to be confused with National Library of Russia. This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Russian State Library" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (June 2011) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) Russian State Library Российская государственная библиотека Main building of the library Established 1862 (158 years ago) (1862)[1] Location Moscow, Russia Branches 3 Collection Size 59,800,000 (2019) Access and use Population served 93,100 (2012) Other information Budget 2,740,000,000 (2019) Director Alexander I. Visly (General Director), Vladimir I. Gnezdilov (Executive Director), Viktor V. Fiodorov (President) [1] Staff 1830 (2012) Website www.rsl.ru/en Map The Russian State Library (Russian: Российская государственная библиотека) is the national library of Russia, located in Moscow. It is the largest in the country and the fifth largest in the world for its collection of books (17.5 million).[2] It was named the V. I. Lenin State Library of the USSR from 1925 until it was renamed in 1992 as the Russian State Library. The library has over 275 km of shelves with more than 43 million items,[1] including over 17 million books and serial volumes, 13 million journals, 350 thousand music scores and sound records, 150,000 maps and others. There are items in 247 languages of the world, the foreign part representing about 29 percent of the entire collection. Between 1922 and 1991 at least one copy of every book published in the USSR was deposited with the library, a practice which continues in a similar method today, with the library designated by law as a legal deposit library. Contents 1 History 2 Footnotes 3 Further reading 4 External links History[edit] See also: Rumyantsev Museum The library was founded on July 1, 1862, as Moscow's first free public library named The Library of the Moscow Public Museum and Rumiantsev Museum, or The Rumiantsev Library. It is nicknamed the "Leninka."[3] Rumyantsev Museum part of the complex was Moscow's first public museum, and housed the Art collection of count Nikolai Petrovich Rumyantsev, which had been given to the Russian people and transferred from St. Petersburg to Moscow. Its donation covered above all books and manuscripts as well as an extensive numismatic and an ethnographic collection. These, as well as approximately 200 paintings and more than 20,000 prints, which had been selected from the collection of the Hermitage in St. Petersburg, could be seen in the so-called Pashkov House (a palace, established between 1784 and 1787, in the proximity of the Kremlin). Tsar Alexander II of Russia donated the painting The Appearance of Christ before the People by Alexander Andreyevich Ivanov for the opening of the museum. 19th-century postcard of Pashkov House, old building of the Russian State Library, overlooking the Kremlin The citizens of Moscow, deeply impressed by the count's altruistic donation, named the new museum after its founder and had the inscription "from count Rumyantsev for the good Enlightenment" carved above its entrance. In the subsequent years, the collection of the museum grew by numerous further donations of objects and money, so that the museum soon housed a yet more important collection of Western European paintings, an extensive antique collection and a large collection of icons. Indeed, the collection grew so much that soon the premises of the Pashkov House became insufficient, and a second building was built beside the museum shortly after the turn of the 20th century to house the paintings in particular. After the October Revolution the contents again grew enormously, and again lack of space became an urgent problem. Acute financial problems also arose, for most of the money to finance the Museum flowed into the Pushkin Museum, which had only been finished a few years before and was assuming the Rumyantsev Museum's role. Therefore, it was decided in 1925 to dissolve the Rumyantsev Museum and to spread its collections over other museums and institutions in the country. Part of the collections, in particular the Western European art and antiques, were thus transferred to the Pushkin Museum. Pashkov House (at 3 Mokhovaya Street) was renamed the Old Building of the Russian State Library. The old state archive building on the corner of Mokhovaya and Vozdvizhenka Streets was razed and replaced by the new buildings. Main building of the library, in front is the monument to Dostoevsky Construction of the first stage, designed by Vladimir Shchuko and Vladimir Gelfreikh in 1927–1929, was authorized in 1929 and commenced in 1930.[4] The first stage was largely complete in 1941. In the process, the building acquired the modernized neoclassicism exterior features of the Palace of Soviets (co-designed by Shchuko and Gelfreikh), departing from the stern modernism of the 1927 drafts.[5] The last component of Shchuko's plan, a 250-seat reading hall, was opened in 1945; further additions continued until 1960.[6] In 1968 the building reached its capacity, and the library launched construction of a new depository in Khimki, earmarked for storing newspapers, scientific works and low-demand books from the main storage areas. The first stage of Khimki library was complete in 1975.[6] In 1925 the complex was renamed the V. I. Lenin State Library of the USSR. In 1992, it was renamed the Russian State Library by order of a decree from President Boris Yeltsin.[7] Entrance hall One of the reading rooms One of the reading rooms Statue of Dostoevsky in front of the library The postage stamp (1939) Russian State Library stamp (Soviet times) The wedding of tsar Michael I Tver manuscript of George Hamartolus Footnotes[edit] ^ a b c "Russian State Library". Official library website. Retrieved 20 November 2010. ^ http://leninka.ru/index.php?doc=2661 ^ "Russian State Library". Retrieved 2 April 2014. ^ "History of the Russian State Library (in Russian). 1917–1941, p. 4". Archived from the original on 2008-02-09. Retrieved 2008-12-10. ^ Ikonnikov, A. V. (1984). Architecture of Moscow, 20th Century. [Arkhitektura Moskvy. XX vek] (in Russian). Moskovsky Rabochy. pp. 98–99. ^ a b "History of the Russian State Library (in Russian). 1945–1992, p. 1". Archived from the original on 2008-02-24. Retrieved 2008-12-10. ^ Stuart, Mary (April 1994). "Creating a National Library for the Workers' State: The Public Library in Petrograd and the Rumiantsev Library under Bolshevik Rule". The Slavonic and East European Review. 72 (2): 233–258. JSTOR 4211475. Further reading[edit] Edward Kasinec, "A Soviet Research Library Remembered," Libraries & Culture, vol. 36, no. 1 (Winter 2001), pp. 16–26. In JSTOR. External links[edit] Wikimedia Commons has media related to Russian State Library. Wikidata has the properties: RSL ID (person) (P947) (see uses) RSL scanned books identifier (P1815) (see uses) RSL editions (P1973) (see uses) Official website Satellite image of the Russian State Library, centered on the main entrance Made in Russia: Russian State Library v t e Authority control files AAG • ACM DL • ADB • AGSA • autores.uy • AWR • BALaT • BIBSYS • Bildindex • BNC • BNE • BNF • Botanist • BPN • CANTIC • CiNii • CWGC • DAAO • DBLP • DSI • FNZA • GND • HDS • IAAF • ICCU • ICIA • ISNI • Joconde • KulturNav • LCCN • LIR • LNB • Léonore • MBA • MGP • NARA • NBL • NDL • NGV • NKC • NLA • NLG • NLI • NLK • NLP • NLR • NSK • NTA • ORCID • PIC • ResearcherID • RERO • RKD • RKDimages ID • RSL • SELIBR • SIKART • SNAC • SUDOC • S2AuthorId • TA98 • TDVİA • TE • TePapa • TH • TLS • Trove • UKPARL • ULAN • US Congress • VcBA • VIAF • WorldCat Identities v t e Museums and galleries in Moscow General museums ART4.RU Contemporary Art Museum Bakhrushin Museum Bulgakov Museum in Moscow Diamond Fund Fersman Mineralogical Museum Galeyev Gallery Gulag Museum Institute of Russian Realist Art Ivan the Great Bell Tower Jewish Museum and Tolerance Center Kuskovo The Lumiere Brothers Center for Photography The Lumiere Brothers Gallery Moscow Cat Museum Moscow Design Museum Moscow House of Photography Moscow Museum of Modern Art Multimedia Art Museum, Moscow Museum of Calligraphy Moscow Paleontological Museum Museum of Moscow Museum of the Moscow Railway National Centre for Contemporary Arts Ostankino Palace Poklonnaya Hill Polytechnic Museum Pushkin Museum RKK Energiya museum Rumyantsev Museum Russian State Library Ryabushinsky Museum of Icons and Paintings Shchusev Museum of Architecture State Historical Museum Tretyakov Gallery Tsaritsyno Palace Vernadsky State Geological Museum Vlakhernskoye-Kuzminki Zoological Museum of Moscow University Religious museums Cathedral of the Annunciation Church of the Deposition of the Robe Church of the Twelve Apostles War and space museums Central Armed Forces Museum Kremlin Armoury Kremlin Arsenal Memorial Museum of Cosmonautics Museum of the Great Patriotic War, Moscow Tagansky Protected Command Point Authority control BNF: cb11989976d (data) GND: 2125990-2 ISNI: 0000 0001 2288 3180 LCCN: nr93003248 NKC: kn20010710293 NLA: 35249610 SELIBR: 116840 SUDOC: 080267092 VcBA: 494/5911 VIAF: 123850266 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n94021537 Coordinates: 55°45′07″N 37°36′35″E / 55.75194°N 37.60972°E / 55.75194; 37.60972 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Russian_State_Library&oldid=995819394" Categories: 1862 establishments in the Russian Empire Buildings and structures in Moscow Culture in Moscow Education in Moscow Libraries in Moscow Museums in Moscow National libraries World Digital Library partners Libraries established in 1862 Deposit libraries Arbat District Library buildings completed in 1941 Library buildings completed in 1945 Library buildings completed in 1960 Library buildings completed in 1975 Hidden categories: CS1 Russian-language sources (ru) Articles needing additional references from June 2011 All articles needing additional references Articles containing Russian-language text Infobox mapframe without OSM relation ID on Wikidata Commons category link is on Wikidata Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NLA identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with VcBA identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Coordinates on Wikidata Pages using the Kartographer extension Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Languages العربية Asturianu Azərbaycanca Башҡортса भोजपुरी Български Català Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Eesti Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français Galego 한국어 Հայերեն Ilokano Bahasa Indonesia Italiano עברית Latina Magyar Македонски മലയാളം مصرى Bahasa Melayu Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål ਪੰਜਾਬੀ پښتو Português Русский Simple English Српски / srpski Suomi Svenska தமிழ் ไทย Türkçe Українська Tiếng Việt Winaray 吴语 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 23 December 2020, at 01:39 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2879 ---- Roman Republic - Wikipedia Roman Republic From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Period of ancient Roman civilization (509–27 BC) For other uses, see Roman Republic (disambiguation). Roman Republic Official name (as on coins): Roma after c. 100 BC: Senatus Populusque Romanus  (Latin) (SPQR) (The Roman Senate and People) 509 BC–27 BC Denarius of 54 BC, showing the first Roman consul, Lucius Junius Brutus, surrounded by two lictors and preceded by an accensus[1] Roman provinces on the eve of the assassination of Julius Caesar, 44 BC Capital Rome Common languages Latin (official) Etruscan, Greek, Osco-Umbrian, Venetic, Ligurian, Rhaetian, Nuragic, Sicel, Hebrew, Aramaic, Syriac, Punic, Berber, Coptic, Illyrian, Iberian, Lusitanian, Celtiberian, Gaulish, Gallaecian, Aquitanian (unofficial, but commonly spoken) Religion Roman polytheism Government Diarchic republic Consuls   • 509 BC (first) Lucius Junius Brutus Lucius Collatinus • 27 BC (last) Octavian Marcus Agrippa Legislature Assemblies Roman Senate Historical era Classical antiquity • Overthrow of the monarchy 509 BC • Dissolution of the Latin League 338 BC[2] • Julius Caesar named dictator 49 BC • Assassination of Julius Caesar 15 March 44 BC • Battle of Actium 2 September 31 BC • Octavian proclaimed Augustus 16 January 27 BC Area 326 BC[3] 10,000 km2 (3,900 sq mi) 50 BC[3] 1,950,000 km2 (750,000 sq mi) Preceded by Succeeded by Roman Kingdom Roman Empire Ancient Rome This article is part of a series on the politics and government of ancient Rome Periods Roman Kingdom 753–509 BC Roman Republic 509–27 BC Roman Empire 27 BC – AD 395 Principate 27 BC – AD 284 Dominate AD 284–641 Western AD 395–476 Eastern AD 395–1453 Timeline Roman Constitution Constitution of the Kingdom Constitution of the Republic Constitution of the Empire Constitution of the Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Executive magistrates Precedent and law Roman law Ius Imperium Mos maiorum Collegiality Auctoritas Roman citizenship Cursus honorum Senatus consultum Senatus consultum ultimum Assemblies Centuriate Curiate Plebeian Tribal Ordinary magistrates Consul Praetor Quaestor Promagistrate Aedile Tribune Censor Governor Extraordinary magistrates Corrector Dictator Magister equitum Consular tribune Rex Triumviri Decemviri Titles and honours Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Praeses Praefectus Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Other countries v t e The Roman Republic (Latin: Rēs pūblica Rōmāna [ˈreːs ˈpuːblɪka roːˈmaːna]) was the era of classical Roman civilization, led by the Roman people, beginning with the overthrow of the Roman Kingdom, traditionally dated to 509 BC, and ending in 27 BC with the establishment of the Roman Empire. During this period, Rome's control expanded from the city's immediate surroundings to hegemony over the entire Mediterranean world. Roman society under the Republic was primarily a cultural mix of Latin and Etruscan societies, as well as of Sabine, Oscan, and Greek cultural elements, which is especially visible in the Roman Pantheon. Its political organization developed at around the same time direct democracy did in Ancient Greece, with collective and annual magistracies, overseen by a senate.[4] The top magistrates were the two consuls, who had an extensive range of executive, legislative, judicial, military, and religious powers. Even though a small number of powerful families (called gentes) monopolised the main magistracies, the Roman Republic is generally considered one of the earliest examples of representative democracy.[5][6][7] Roman institutions underwent considerable changes throughout the Republic to adapt to the difficulties it faced, such as the creation of promagistracies to rule its conquered provinces, or the composition of the senate. Unlike the Pax Romana of the Roman Empire, the Republic was in a state of quasi-perpetual war throughout its existence. Its first enemies were its Latin and Etruscan neighbours as well as the Gauls, who even sacked the city in 387 BC. The Republic nonetheless demonstrated extreme resilience and always managed to overcome its losses, however catastrophic. After the Gallic Sack, Rome conquered the whole Italian peninsula in a century, which turned the Republic into a major power in the Mediterranean. The Republic's greatest enemy was doubtless Carthage, against which it waged three wars. The Punic general Hannibal famously invaded Italy by crossing the Alps and inflicted on Rome two devastating defeats at Lake Trasimene and Cannae, but the Republic once again recovered and won the war thanks to Scipio Africanus at the Battle of Zama in 202 BC. With Carthage defeated, Rome became the dominant power of the ancient Mediterranean world. It then embarked on a long series of difficult conquests, after having notably defeated Philip V and Perseus of Macedon, Antiochus III of the Seleucid Empire, the Lusitanian Viriathus, the Numidian Jugurtha, the Pontic king Mithridates VI, the Gaul Vercingetorix, and the Egyptian queen Cleopatra. At home, the Republic similarly experienced a long streak of social and political crises, which ended in several violent civil wars. At first, the Conflict of the Orders opposed the patricians, the closed oligarchic elite, to the far more numerous plebs, who finally achieved political equality in several steps during the 4th century BC. Later, the vast conquests of the Republic disrupted its society, as the immense influx of slaves they brought enriched the aristocracy, but ruined the peasantry and urban workers. In order to solve this issue, several social reformers, known as the Populares, tried to pass agrarian laws, but the Gracchi brothers, Saturninus, or Clodius Pulcher were all murdered by their opponents, the Optimates, keepers of the traditional aristocratic order. Mass slavery also caused three Servile Wars; the last of them was led by Spartacus, a skilful gladiator who ravaged Italy and left Rome powerless until his defeat in 71 BC. In this context, the last decades of the Republic were marked by the rise of great generals, who exploited their military conquests and the factional situation in Rome to gain control of the political system. Marius (between 105 and 86 BC), then Sulla (between 82 and 78 BC) dominated in turn the Republic; both used extraordinary powers to purge their opponents. These multiple tensions led to a series of civil wars; the first between the two generals Julius Caesar and Pompey. Despite his victory and appointment as dictator for life, Caesar was murdered in 44 BC. Caesar's heir Octavian and lieutenant Mark Antony defeated Caesar's assassins Brutus and Cassius in 42 BC, but then turned against each other. The final defeat of Mark Antony alongside his ally and lover Cleopatra at the Battle of Actium in 31 BC, and the Senate's grant of extraordinary powers to Octavian as Augustus in 27 BC – which effectively made him the first Roman emperor – thus ended the Republic. Contents 1 History 1.1 Foundation (509 BC) 1.2 Rome in Latium (509–387 BC) 1.2.1 Early campaigns 1.2.2 Plebeians and patricians 1.2.3 Celtic invasion of Italy (390–387 BC) 1.3 Roman expansion in Italy (387–272 BC) 1.3.1 Wars against Italian neighbours 1.3.2 Rise of the plebeian nobility 1.3.3 Pyrrhic War (280–275 BC) 1.4 Punic Wars and expansion in the Mediterranean (264–146 BC) 1.4.1 First Punic War (264–241 BC) 1.4.2 Second Punic War (218–201 BC) 1.4.3 Roman supremacy in the Greek East (200–188 BC) 1.4.4 Conquest of Greece (172–146 BC) 1.4.5 Third Punic War (149–146 BC) 1.5 Social troubles and first civil war (146–60 BC) 1.5.1 The Gracchi (133–121 BC) 1.5.2 Rise of Marius 1.5.3 Sulla's Civil Wars 1.5.4 Pompey's dominance 1.6 Triumvirates and end of the Republic (60–27 BC) 1.6.1 First Triumvirate (60–50 BC) 1.6.2 Caesar's Civil War and dictatorship (49–44 BC) 1.6.3 Second Triumvirate 2 Constitutional system 2.1 Senate 2.2 Legislative assemblies 2.3 Magistrates 3 Military 3.1 Hoplite armies (509–c. 315 BC) 3.2 Manipular legion (c. 315–107 BC) 3.3 Legion after the reforms of Gaius Marius (107–27 BC) 4 Social structure 5 Trade and economy 5.1 Farming 6 Religion 6.1 Priesthoods 6.2 Temples and festivals 6.3 In the military 7 Cities, towns and villas 7.1 City of Rome 8 Culture 8.1 Clothing 8.2 Food and dining 8.3 Education and language 8.4 Arts 8.5 Literature 8.6 Sports and entertainment 9 See also 10 Footnotes 11 References 12 Ancient sources 13 Works cited 13.1 General history of the Roman Republic (ordered chronologically) 13.2 Specific subjects 14 External links History[edit] Foundation (509 BC)[edit] Main article: Overthrow of the Roman monarchy Since the foundation of Rome, its rulers had been monarchs, elected for life by the patrician noblemen who made up the Roman Senate. The last Roman king was Lucius Tarquinius Superbus ("Tarquin the Proud"). In the traditional histories, Tarquin was expelled in 509 because his son Sextus Tarquinius had raped the noblewoman Lucretia, who afterwards took her own life. Lucretia's father, her husband Lucius Tarquinius Collatinus, and Tarquin's nephew Lucius Junius Brutus mustered support from the Senate and army, and forced Tarquin into exile in Etruria.[8][9][10] The Senate agreed to abolish kingship. Most of the king's former functions were transferred to two consuls, who were elected to office for a term of one year. Each consul had the capacity to act as a check on his colleague, if necessary through the same power of veto that the kings had held. If a consul abused his powers in office, he could be prosecuted when his term expired. Brutus and Collatinus became Republican Rome's first consuls. Despite Collatinus' role in the creation of the Republic, he belonged to the same family as the former king, and was forced to abdicate his office and leave Rome. He was replaced as co-consul by Publius Valerius Publicola.[11] Most modern scholarship describes these events as the quasi-mythological detailing of an aristocratic coup within Tarquin's own family, not a popular revolution. They fit a narrative of a personal vengeance against a tyrant leading to his overthrow, which was common among Greek cities and even theorised by Aristotle.[12][13][14] Rome in Latium (509–387 BC)[edit] Early campaigns[edit] According to Rome's traditional histories, Tarquin made several attempts to retake the throne, including the Tarquinian conspiracy, which involved Brutus' own sons, the war with Veii and Tarquinii and finally the war between Rome and Clusium; but none succeeded.[15] The "Capitoline Brutus", a bust possibly depicting Lucius Junius Brutus, who led the revolt against Rome's last king and was a founder of the Republic The first Roman republican wars were wars of both expansion and defence, aimed at protecting Rome itself from neighbouring cities and nations and establishing its territory in the region.[16] Initially, Rome's immediate neighbours were either Latin towns and villages, or else tribal Sabines from the Apennine hills beyond. One by one Rome defeated both the persistent Sabines and the local cities, both those under Etruscan control and those that had cast off their Etruscan rulers. Rome defeated the Latin cities in the Battle of Lake Regillus in 496, the Battle of Mount Algidus in 458, the Battle of Corbio in 446, the Battle of Aricia, however it suffered a significant defeat at the Battle of the Cremera in 477 wherein it fought against the most important Etruscan city of Veii.[17][18] v t e Rome's early Italian campaigns Lake Regillus The Cremera Mount Algidus Corbio Fidenae Veii By the end of this period, Rome had effectively completed the conquest of their immediate Etruscan and Latin neighbours, and also secured their position against the immediate threat posed by the nearby Apennine hill tribes.[19] Plebeians and patricians[edit] Main article: Conflict of the Orders Beginning with their revolt against Tarquin, and continuing through the early years of the Republic, Rome's patrician aristocrats were the dominant force in politics and society. They initially formed a closed group of about 50 large families, called gentes, who monopolised Rome's magistracies, state priesthoods and senior military posts. The most prominent of these families were the Cornelii,[i] followed by the Aemilii, Claudii, Fabii, and Valerii. The power, privilege and influence of leading families derived from their wealth, in particular from their landholdings, their position as patrons, and their numerous clients.[20] The vast majority of Roman citizens were commoners of various social degrees. They formed the backbone of Rome's economy, as smallholding farmers, managers, artisans, traders, and tenants. In times of war, they could be summoned for military service. Most had little direct political influence over the Senate's decisions or the laws it passed, including the abolition of the monarchy and the creation of the consular system. During the early Republic, the plebs (or plebeians) emerged as a self-organised, culturally distinct group of commoners, with their own internal hierarchy, laws, customs, and interests.[21] Plebeians had no access to high religious and civil office,[ii] and could be punished for offences against laws of which they had no knowledge.[22] For the poorest, one of the few effective political tools was their withdrawal of labour and services, in a "secessio plebis"; they would leave the city en masse, and allow their social superiors to fend for themselves. The first such secession occurred in 494, in protest at the abusive treatment of plebeian debtors by the wealthy during a famine.[23] The Senate was compelled to give them direct access to the written civil and religious laws, and to the electoral and political process. To represent their interests, the plebs elected tribunes, who were personally sacrosanct, immune to arbitrary arrest by any magistrate, and had veto power over the passage of legislation.[24] Celtic invasion of Italy (390–387 BC)[edit] v t e Roman–Gallic wars Allia River Anio River Pedum Arretium Lake Vadimo Faesulae Telamon Clastidium Silva Litana Cremona Placentia Mutina By 390, several Gallic tribes were invading Italy from the north. The Romans were alerted to this when a particularly warlike tribe, the Senones,[25] invaded two Etruscan towns close to Rome's sphere of influence. These towns, overwhelmed by the enemy's numbers and ferocity, called on Rome for help. The Romans met the Gauls in pitched battle at the Battle of Allia River around 390–387 BC. The Gauls, led by the chieftain Brennus, defeated the Roman army of approximately 15,000 troops, pursued the fleeing Romans back to Rome, and sacked the city before being either driven off or bought off. Roman expansion in Italy (387–272 BC)[edit] Wars against Italian neighbours[edit] Map showing Roman expansion in Italy v t e Ancient unification of Italy Roman–Etruscan Wars Roman–Latin wars Roman–Volscian wars Roman conquest of the Hernici Samnite Wars Pyrrhic War Social War v t e Samnite Wars First Samnite War Mons Gaurus Saticula Suessula Second Samnite War Neapolis Imbrinium Caudine Forks Lautulae Lake Vadimo Bovianum Third Samnite War Camerinum Tifernum Sentinum Aquilonia From 343 to 341, Rome won two battles against their Samnite neighbours, but were unable to consolidate their gains, due to the outbreak of war with former Latin allies. In the Latin War (340–338), Rome defeated a coalition of Latins at the battles of Vesuvius and the Trifanum. The Latins submitted to Roman rule.[26] A Second Samnite War began in 327.[27] The fortunes of the two sides fluctuated, but from 314, Rome was dominant, and offered progressively unfavourable terms for peace. The war ended with Samnite defeat at the Battle of Bovianum (305). By the following year, Rome had annexed most Samnite territory and began to establish colonies there; but in 298 the Samnites rebelled, and defeated a Roman army, in a Third Samnite War. Following this success they built a coalition of several previous enemies of Rome.[28] At the Battle of Populonia in 282 Rome finished off the last vestiges of Etruscan power in the region. Rise of the plebeian nobility[edit] In the 4th century, plebeians gradually obtained political equality with patricians. The starting point was in 400, when the first plebeian consular tribunes were elected; likewise, several subsequent consular colleges counted plebeians (in 399, 396, 388, 383, and 379). The reason behind this sudden gain is unknown,[29] but it was limited as patrician tribunes retained preeminence over their plebeian colleagues.[30] In 385, the former consul and saviour of the besieged Capitol Marcus Manlius Capitolinus is said to have sided with the plebeians, ruined by the Sack and largely indebted to patricians. The issue of debt relief for the plebs remained indeed pressing throughout the century. Livy tells that Capitolinus sold his estate to repay the debt of many of them, and even went over to the plebs, the first patrician to do so. Nevertheless, the growing unrest he had caused led to his trial for seeking kingly power; he was sentenced to death and thrown from the Tarpeian Rock.[31][32] Between 376 and 367, the tribunes of the plebs Gaius Licinius Stolo and Lucius Sextius Lateranus continued the plebeian agitation and pushed for an ambitious legislation, known as the Leges Liciniae Sextiae. Two of their bills attacked patricians' economic supremacy, by creating legal protection against indebtedness and forbidding excessive use of public land, as the Ager publicus was monopolised by large landowners. The most important bill opened the consulship to plebeians.[33] Other tribunes controlled by the patricians vetoed the bills, but Stolo and Lateranus retaliated by vetoing the elections for five years while being continuously re-elected by the plebs, resulting in a stalemate.[34] In 367, they carried a bill creating the Decemviri sacris faciundis, a college of ten priests, of whom five had to be plebeians, therefore breaking patricians' monopoly on priesthoods. Finally, the resolution of the crisis came from the dictator Camillus, who made a compromise with the tribunes; he agreed to their bills, while they in return consented to the creation of the offices of praetor and curule aediles, both reserved to patricians. Lateranus also became the first plebeian consul in 366; Stolo followed in 361.[35][36][37] Soon after, plebeians were able to hold both the dictatorship and the censorship, since former consuls normally filled these senior magistracies. The four time consul Gaius Marcius Rutilus became the first plebeian dictator in 356 and censor in 351. In 342, the tribune of the plebs Lucius Genucius passed his Leges Genuciae, which abolished interest on loans, in a renewed effort to tackle indebtedness, required the election of at least one plebeian consul each year, and prohibited a magistrate from holding the same magistracy for the next ten years or two magistracies in the same year.[38][33][39] In 339, the plebeian consul and dictator Quintus Publilius Philo passed three laws extending the powers of the plebeians. His first law followed the Lex Genucia by reserving one censorship to plebeians, the second made plebiscites binding on all citizens (including patricians), and the third stated that the Senate had to give its prior approval to plebiscites before becoming binding on all citizens (the Lex Valeria-Horatia of 449 had placed this approval after the vote).[40] Two years later, Publilius ran for the praetorship, probably in a bid to take the last senior magistracy closed to plebeians, which he won.[41] The Temple of Hercules Victor, Rome, built in the mid 2nd century BC, most likely by Lucius Mummius Achaicus, who won the Achaean War During the early republic, senators were chosen by the consuls among their supporters. Shortly before 312, the Lex Ovinia transferred this power to the censors, who could only remove senators for misconduct, thus appointing them for life. This law strongly increased the power of the Senate, which was by now protected from the influence of the consuls and became the central organ of government.[42][43] In 312, following this law, the patrician censor Appius Claudius Caecus appointed many more senators to fill the new limit of 300, including descendants of freedmen, which was deemed scandalous. He also incorporated these freedmen in the rural tribes.[iii][iv] His tribal reforms were nonetheless cancelled by the next censors, Quintus Fabius Maximus and Publius Decius Mus, his political enemies.[44] Caecus also launched a vast construction program, building the first aqueduct (Aqua Appia), and the first Roman road (Via Appia).[45] In 300, the two tribunes of the plebs Gnaeus and Quintus Ogulnius passed the Lex Ogulnia, which created four plebeian pontiffs, therefore equalling the number of patrician pontiffs, and five plebeian augurs, outnumbering the four patricians in the college.[46] Eventually the Conflict of the Orders ended with the last secession of the plebs in about 287. The details are not known precisely as Livy's books on the period are lost. Debt is once again mentioned by ancient authors, but it seems that the plebs revolted over the distribution of the land conquered on the Samnites.[47] A dictator named Quintus Hortensius was appointed to negotiate with the plebeians, who had retreated to the Janiculum hill, perhaps to dodge the draft in the war against the Lucanians. Hortensius passed the Lex Hortensia which re-enacted the law of 339, making plebiscites binding on all citizens, but also removed the Senate's prior approval to plebiscites. Popular assemblies were by now sovereign; this put an end to the crisis, and to plebeian agitation for 150 years.[48] These events were a political victory of the wealthy plebeian elite who exploited the economic difficulties of the plebs for their own gain, hence why Stolo, Lateranus, and Genucius bound their bills attacking patricians' political supremacy with debt-relief measures. They had indeed little in common with the mass of plebeians; Stolo was noteworthy fined for having exceeded the limit on land occupation he had fixed in his own law.[49] As a result of the end of the patrician monopoly on senior magistracies, many small patrician gentes faded into history during the 4th and 3rd centuries due to the lack of available positions; the Verginii, Horatii, Menenii, Cloelii all disappear, even the Julii entered a long eclipse. They were replaced by plebeian aristocrats, of whom the most emblematic were the Caecilii Metelli, who received 18 consulships until the end of the Republic; the Domitii, Fulvii, Licinii, Marcii, or Sempronii were as successful. About a dozen remaining patrician gentes and twenty plebeian ones thus formed a new elite, called the nobiles, or Nobilitas.[50] Pyrrhic War (280–275 BC)[edit] Route of Pyrrhus in Italy and Sicily Bust of Pyrrhus, found in the Villa of the Papyri at Herculaneum, now in the Naples Archaeological Museum. Pyrrhus was a brave and chivalrous general who fascinated the Romans, hence his presence in a Roman house.[51] By the beginning of the 3rd century, Rome had established itself as the major power in Italy, but had not yet come into conflict with the dominant military powers of the Mediterranean: Carthage and the Greek kingdoms.[52] In 282, several Roman warships entered the harbour of Tarentum, thus breaking a treaty between the Republic and the Greek city, which forbade the Gulf to Roman navy. It triggered a violent reaction from the Tarentine democrats, who sank some of the ships; they were in fact worried that Rome could favour the oligarchs in the city, as it had done with the other Greek cities under its control. The Roman embassy sent to investigate the affair was insulted and war was promptly declared.[53] Facing a hopeless situation, the Tarentines (together with the Lucanians and Samnites) appealed for military aid to Pyrrhus, the very ambitious king of Epirus. A cousin of Alexander the Great, he was eager to build an empire for himself in the western Mediterranean, and saw Tarentum's plea as a perfect opportunity towards this goal.[54][55] v t e Pyrrhic War Heraclea Asculum Venusia Rhegium Syracuse Eryx Cranita Lilybaeum Messina Beneventum Pyrrhus and his army of 25,500 men (and 20 war elephants) landed in Italy in 280; he was immediately named Strategos Autokrator by the Tarentines. Publius Valerius Laevinus, the consul sent to face him, rejected the king's negotiation offer, as he had more troops and hoped to cut the invasion short. The Romans were nevertheless defeated at Heraclea, as their cavalry were afraid of the elephants of Pyrrhus, who lost a large portion of his army. Pyrrhus then marched on Rome, but could not take any Roman city on his way; facing the prospect of being flanked by the two consular armies, he moved back to Tarentum. His adviser, the orator Cineas, made a peace offer before the Roman Senate, asking Rome to return the land it took from the Samnites and Lucanians, and liberate the Greek cities under its control. The offer was rejected after Appius Caecus (the old censor of 312) spoke against it in a celebrated speech, which was the earliest recorded by the time of Cicero.[56][57][58] In 279, Pyrrhus met the consuls Publius Decius Mus and Publius Sulpicius Saverrio at the Battle of Asculum, which remained undecided for two days, as the Romans had prepared some special chariots to counter his elephants. Finally, Pyrrhus personally charged into the melee and won the battle, but at the cost of an important part of his troops; he allegedly said "If we are victorious in one more battle with the Romans, we shall be utterly ruined."[59][60][61][v] He escaped the Italian deadlock by answering a call for help from Syracuse, which tyrant Thoenon was desperately fighting an invasion from Carthage. Pyrrhus could not let them take the whole island as it would have compromised his ambitions in the western Mediterranean and so declared war on them. At first, his Sicilian campaign was an easy triumph; he was welcomed as a liberator in every Greek city on his way, even receiving the title of king (basileus) of Sicily. The Carthaginians lifted the siege of Syracuse before his arrival, but he could not entirely oust them from the island as he failed to take their fortress of Lilybaeum.[62] His harsh rule, especially the murder of Thoenon, whom he did not trust, soon led to a widespread antipathy among the Sicilians; some cities even defected to Carthage. In 275, Pyrrhus left the island before he had to face a full-scale rebellion.[63] He returned to Italy, where his Samnite allies were on the verge of losing the war, despite their earlier victory at the Cranita hills. Pyrrhus again met the Romans at the Battle of Beneventum; this time the consul Manius Dentatus was victorious, and even captured eight elephants. Pyrrhus then withdrew from Italy, but left a garrison in Tarentum, and waged a new campaign in Greece against Antigonos Gonatas. His death in battle at Argos in 272 forced Tarentum to surrender to Rome. Since it was the last independent city of Italy, Rome now dominated the entire Italian peninsula, and won an international military reputation.[64] Punic Wars and expansion in the Mediterranean (264–146 BC)[edit] First Punic War (264–241 BC)[edit] Main article: Punic Wars v t e First Punic War Treaties Messana Agrigentum 1st Mytistratus Lipari Islands Mylae Thermae 2nd Mytistratus Sulci Tyndaris Cape Ecnomus Aspis Adys Bagradas (Tunis) Cape Hermaeum Panormus Lilybaeum Drepana Phintias Drepana (siege) 1st Mt Eryx 2nd Mt Eryx Aegates Islands Treaty of Lutatius Coin of Hiero II of Syracuse Rome and Carthage were initially on friendly terms; Polybius details three treaties between them, the first dating from the first year of the Republic, the second from 348. The last one was an alliance against Pyrrhus.[65][66][67] However, tensions rapidly built on after the departure of the Epirote king. Between 288 and 283, Messina in Sicily was taken by the Mamertines, a band of mercenaries formerly employed by Agathocles. They plundered the surroundings until Hiero II, the new tyrant of Syracuse, defeated them (in either 269 or 265). Carthage could not let him take Messina, as he would have controlled its Strait, and garrisoned the city. In effect under a Carthaginian protectorate, the remaining Mamertines appealed to Rome to regain their independence. Senators were divided on whether to help them or not, as it would have meant war with Carthage, since Sicily was in its sphere of influence (the treaties furthermore forbade the island to Rome), and also Syracuse. A supporter of the war, the consul Appius Claudius Caudex (Caecus' brother) turned to the Tribal Assembly to get a favourable vote, by notably promising booty to voters.[68] Caudex first secured control of the city with ease. However, Syracuse and Carthage, at war for centuries, made an alliance to counter the invasion and blockaded Messina, but Caudex defeated Hiero and Carthage separately.[69][70] His successor Manius Valerius Corvinus Messalla landed with a strong 40,000 men army that conquered eastern Sicily, which prompted Hiero to shift his allegiance and forge a long lasting alliance with Rome. In 262, the Romans moved to the southern coast and besieged Akragas. In order to raise the siege, Carthage sent reinforcements, including 60 elephants – the first time they used them, but still lost the battle.[71] Nevertheless, as Pyrrhus before, Rome could not take all of Sicily because Carthage's naval superiority prevented them from effectively besieging coastal cities, which could receive supplies from the sea. Using a captured Carthaginian ship as blueprint, Rome therefore launched a massive construction program and built 100 quinqueremes in only two months, perhaps through an assembly line organisation. They also invented a new device, the corvus, a grappling engine which enabled a crew to board on an enemy ship.[72] The consul for 260 Scipio Asina lost the first naval skirmish of the war against Hannibal Gisco at Lipara, but his colleague Gaius Dullius won a great victory at Mylae. He destroyed or captured 44 ships, and was the first Roman to receive a naval triumph, which also included captive Carthaginians for the first time.[73] Although Carthage was victorious on land at Thermae in Sicily, the corvus made Rome invincible on the waters. The consul Lucius Cornelius Scipio (Asina's brother) captured Corsica in 259; his successors won the naval battles of Sulci in 258, Tyndaris in 257, and Cape Ecnomus in 256.[74] Diagram of a corvus In order to hasten the end of the war, the consuls for 256 decided to carry the operations to Africa, on Carthage's homeland. The consul Marcus Atilius Regulus landed on the Cap Bon peninsula with about 18,000 soldiers. He captured the city of Aspis, then repulsed Carthage's counter-attack at Adys, and took Tunis. The Carthaginians supposedly sued him for peace, but his conditions were so harsh that they continued the war instead. They hired Spartan mercenaries, led by Xanthippus, to command their troops.[75] In 255, the Spartan general marched on Regulus, still encamped at Tunis, who accepted the battle to avoid sharing the glory with his successor. However, the flat land near Tunis favoured the Punic elephants, which crushed the Roman infantry on the Bagradas plain; only 2,000 soldiers escaped, and Regulus was captured. The consuls for 255 nonetheless won a new sounding naval victory at Cape Hermaeum, where they captured 114 warships. This success was spoilt by a storm that annihilated the victorious navy: 184 ships of 264 sank, 25,000 soldiers and 75,000 rowers drowned. The corvus considerably hindered ships' navigation, and made them vulnerable during tempest. It was abandoned after another similar catastrophe took place in 253 (150 ships sank with their crew). These disasters prevented any significant campaign between 254 and 252.[76] Denarius of C. Caecilius Metellus Caprarius, 125 BC. The reverse depicts the triumph of his great-grandfather Lucius, with the elephants he had captured at Panormos. The elephant had thence become the emblem of the powerful Caecilii Metelli.[77] Hostilities in Sicily resumed in 252, with the taking of Thermae by Rome. Carthage countered the following year, by besieging Lucius Caecilius Metellus, who held Panormos (now Palermo). The consul had dug trenches to counter the elephants, which once hurt by missiles turned back on their own army, resulting in a great victory for Metellus, who exhibited some captured beasts in the Circus. Rome then besieged the last Carthaginian strongholds in Sicily, Lilybaeum and Drepana, but these cities were impregnable by land. Publius Claudius Pulcher, the consul of 249, recklessly tried to take the latter from the sea, but he suffered a terrible defeat; his colleague Lucius Junius Pullus likewise lost his fleet off Lilybaeum. Without the corvus, Roman warships had lost their advantage. By now, both sides were drained and could not undertake large scale operations; the number of Roman citizens who were being called up for war had been reduced by 17% in two decades, a result of the massive bloodshed. The only military activity during this period was the landing in Sicily of Hamilcar Barca in 247, who harassed the Romans with a mercenary army from a citadel he built on Mt. Eryx.[78] Finally, unable to take the Punic fortresses in Sicily, Rome tried to win the decision at sea and built a new navy, thanks to a forced borrowing on the rich. In 242, the 200 quinqueremes of the consul Gaius Lutatius Catulus blockaded Drepana. The rescue fleet from Carthage arrived the next year, but was largely undermanned and soundly defeated by Catulus. Exhausted and unable to bring supplies to Sicily, Carthage sued for peace. Catulus and Hamilcar negotiated a treaty, which was somewhat lenient to Carthage, but the Roman people rejected it and imposed harsher terms: Carthage had to pay 1000 talents immediately and 2200 over ten years, and evacuate Sicily. The fine was so high that Carthage could not pay Hamilcar's mercenaries, who had been shipped back to Africa. They revolted during the Mercenary War, which Carthage had enormous difficulties to suppress. Meanwhile, Rome took advantage of a similar revolt in Sardinia to seize the island from Carthage, in violation of the peace treaty. This stab-in-the-back led to permanent bitterness in Carthage, and revanchism.[79] Second Punic War (218–201 BC)[edit] v t e Second Punic War Prelude Saguntum Rhone Crossing of the Alps Italy Ticinus Trebia Lake Trasimene Umbrian Lake Ager Falernus Geronium Cannae Silva Litana 1st Nola 1st Casilinum Hamae 1st Petelia 2nd Nola 3rd Nola 1st Beneventum 2nd Casilinum Lucania Arpi 1st Tarentum 2nd Beneventum Campi Veteres 1st Capua Silarus 1st Herdonia 2nd Capua Sapriportis 2nd Herdonia Numistro Canusium Manduria Caulonia 2nd Tarentum 2nd Petelia Venusia Grumentum Metaurus Crotona Insubria Iberia Cissa Ebro River Ibera Upper Baetis 1st New Carthage Baecula Carmona Ilipa Sucro Carteia 2nd New Carthage Sicily and Sardinia Lilybaeum Malta Decimomannu Leontini Syracuse Himera Agrigentum North Africa Clupea 1st Utica 2nd Utica Great Plains (Bagradas) Cirta Zama After its victory, the Republic shifted its attention to its northern border as the Insubres and Boii were threatening Italy.[80] Meanwhile, Carthage compensated the loss of Sicily and Sardinia with the conquest of Southern Hispania (up to Salamanca), and its rich silver mines.[81] This enterprise was the work of the Barcid family, headed by Hamilcar, the former commander in Sicily. Hamilcar nonetheless died against the Oretani in 228; his son-in-law Hasdrubal the Fair – the founder of Carthago Nova – and his three sons Hannibal, Hasdrubal, and Mago, succeeded him.[82] This rapid expansion worried Rome, which concluded a treaty with Hasdrubal in 226, stating that Carthage could not cross the Ebro river.[83][84] However, the city of Saguntum, located in the south of the Ebro, appealed to Rome in 220 to act as arbitrator during a stasis. Hannibal dismissed Roman rights on the city, and took it in 219.[85] At Rome, the Cornelii and the Aemilii considered the capture of Saguntum a casus belli,[86] and won the debate against Fabius Maximus Verrucosus, who wanted to negotiate. An embassy carrying an ultimatum was sent to Carthage, asking its senate to condemn Hannibal's deeds. The Carthaginian refusal started the Second Punic War.[87] Principal offensives of the war: Rome (red), Hannibal (green), Hasdrubal (purple) Initially, the plan of the Republic was to carry war outside Italy, by sending the consuls Publius Cornelius Scipio to Hispania, and Sempronius Longus to Africa, while their naval superiority prevented Carthage from attacking from the sea.[88] This plan was thwarted by Hannibal's bold move to Italy. In May 218, he indeed crossed the Ebro with a large army of about 100,000 soldiers and 37 elephants.[89] He passed in Gaul, crossed the Rhone, then the Alps, possibly through the Col de Clapier (2,491 meters high).[90] This famous exploit cost him almost half of his troops,[91] but he could now rely on the Boii and Insubres, still at war with Rome.[92] Publius Scipio, who had failed to block Hannibal on the Rhone, sent his elder brother Gnaeus with the main part of his army in Hispania according to the initial plan, and went back to Italy with the rest to resist Hannibal in Italy, but he was defeated and wounded near Pavia. Hannibal then marched south and won three outstanding victories. The first one was on the banks of the Trebia in December 218, where he defeated the other consul Sempronius Longus thanks to his brother Mago, who had concealed some elite troops behind the legions and attacked them from the rear once fighting Hannibal. More than half of the Roman army was lost. Hannibal then ravaged the country around Arretium to lure the new consul Gaius Flaminius into a trap, at the Lake Trasimene. He had hidden his troops in the hills surrounding the lake and attacked Flaminius when he was cornered on the shore. This clever ambush resulted in the death of the consul and the complete destruction of his army of 30,000 men. In 216, the new consuls Aemilius Paullus and Terentius Varro mustered the biggest army possible, with eight legions (more than 80,000 soldiers) – twice as many as the Punic army – and confronted Hannibal, who was encamped at Cannae, in Apulia. Despite his numerical disadvantage, Hannibal used his heavier cavalry to rout the Roman wings and envelop their infantry, whom he annihilated. In terms of casualties, the Battle of Cannae was the worst defeat in the history of Rome: only 14,500 soldiers escaped; Paullus was killed as well as 80 senators.[93] Soon after, the Boii ambushed the army of the consul-elect for 215, Postumius Albinus, who died with all his army of 25,000 men in the Forest of Litana. A quarter shekel of Carthage, perhaps minted in Spain. The obverse may depict Hannibal under the traits of young Melqart. The reverse features one of his famous war elephants.[94] These disasters triggered a wave of defection among Roman allies, with the rebellions of the Samnites, Oscans, Lucanians, and Greek cities of Southern Italy.[95] In Macedonia, Philip V also made an alliance with Hannibal in order to take Illyria and the area around Epidamnus, occupied by Rome. His attack on Apollonia started the First Macedonian War. In 215, Hiero II of Syracuse died of old age, and his young grandson Hieronymus broke the long alliance with Rome to side with Carthage. At this desperate point, the aggressive strategy against Hannibal advocated by the Scipiones was abandoned in favour of delaying tactics that avoided direct confrontation with him. Its main proponents were the consuls Fabius Maximus Verrucosus, nicknamed Cunctator ("the delayer"), Claudius Marcellus, and Fulvius Flaccus. The "Fabian Strategy" favoured a slow reconquest of the lost territories, since Hannibal could not be everywhere to defend them.[96] Although he remained invincible on the battlefield, defeating all the Roman armies on his way, he could not prevent Claudius Marcellus from taking Syracuse in 212 after a long siege, nor the fall of his bases of Capua and Tarentum in 211 and 209. However, in 208 the consuls Claudius Marcellus and Quinctius Crispinus were ambushed and killed near Venusia. In Hispania, the situation was overall much better for Rome. This theatre was mostly commanded by the brothers Publius and Gnaeus Scipio, who won the battles of Cissa in 218, soon after Hannibal's departure, and Dertosa against his brother Hasdrubal in 215, which enabled them to conquer the eastern coast of Hispania. In 211 however, Hasdrubal and Mago Barca successfully returned the Celtiberian tribes that supported the Scipiones, and attacked them simultaneously at the Battle of the Upper Baetis, in which the Scipiones brothers died.[97] Publius' son, the future Scipio Africanus, was then elected with a special proconsulship to lead the Hispanic campaign. He soon showed outstanding skills as a commander, by winning a series of battles with ingenious tactics. In 209, he took Carthago Nova, the main Punic base in Hispania, then defeated Hasdrubal at the Battle of Baecula (208).[98] After his defeat, Hasdrubal was ordered by Carthage to move to Italy. Since he could not use ships, he followed the same route as his brother through the Alps, but this time the surprise effect was gone. The consuls Livius Salinator and Claudius Nero were awaiting him and won the Battle of the Metaurus, where Hasdrubal died.[99] It was the turning point of the war. The attrition campaign had indeed worked well: Hannibal's troops were now depleted; he only had one elephant left (Surus) and retreated to Bruttium, on the defensive. In Greece, Rome contained Philip V without devoting too many forces, by setting an alliance with the Aetolian League, Sparta, and Pergamon, which also prevented Philip from aiding Hannibal. The war resulted in a stalemate, with the Treaty of Phoenice signed in 205. v t e First Macedonian War Apollonia 1st Lamia 2nd Lamia Mantinea In Hispania, Scipio continued his triumphal campaign at the battles of Carmona in 207, and Ilipa (now Seville) in 206, which ended the Punic threat on the peninsula.[100] Elected consul in 205, he convinced the Senate to cancel the Fabian Strategy, and instead to invade Africa by using the support of the Numidian king Massinissa, who had defected to Rome. Scipio landed in Africa in 204. He took Utica, then won the Battle of the Great Plains, which prompted Carthage to recall Hannibal from Italy and open peace negotiations with Rome. The talks nevertheless failed because Scipio wanted to impose harsher terms on Carthage, in order to avoid it from rising again as a threat to Rome. Hannibal was therefore sent to face Scipio at Zama. Scipio could now use the heavy Numidian cavalry of Massinissa – which had hitherto been so successful against Rome – to rout the Punic wings, then flank the infantry, as Hannibal had done at Cannae. Defeated for the first time, Hannibal convinced the Carthaginian Senate to pay the war indemnity, which was even harsher than that of 241: 10,000 talents in 50 instalments. Carthage furthermore had to give up all its elephants, all its fleet but ten triremes, all its possessions outside its core territory in Africa (what is now Tunisia), and could not declare war without the authorisation of Rome. In effect, Carthage was condemned to be a minor power, while Rome recovered from a desperate situation to dominate the Western Mediterranean. Roman supremacy in the Greek East (200–188 BC)[edit] Macedonian Wars Macedonia, Greece and Asia at the outbreak of the Second Macedonian War, 200 BC v t e Macedonian Wars First Second Third Fourth v t e Second Macedonian War Aous Cynoscephalae v t e Roman–Seleucid War Thermopylae Corycus Eurymedon Myonessus Magnesia v t e Third Macedonian War Callinicus Pydna v t e Fourth Macedonian War Pydna (148 BC) Rome's preoccupation with its war with Carthage provided an opportunity for Philip V of the kingdom of Macedonia, located in the north of the Greek peninsula, to attempt to extend his power westward. Philip sent ambassadors to Hannibal's camp in Italy, to negotiate an alliance as common enemies of Rome.[101][102] However, Rome discovered the agreement when Philip's emissaries were captured by a Roman fleet.[101] The First Macedonian War saw the Romans involved directly in only limited land operations, but they ultimately achieved their objective of preoccupying Philip and preventing him from aiding Hannibal. The past century had seen the Greek world dominated by the three primary successor kingdoms of Alexander the Great's empire: Ptolemaic Egypt, Macedonia and the Seleucid Empire. In 202, internal problems led to a weakening of Egypt's position, thereby disrupting the power balance among the successor states. Macedonia and the Seleucid Empire agreed to an alliance to conquer and divide Egypt.[103] Fearing this increasingly unstable situation, several small Greek kingdoms sent delegations to Rome to seek an alliance.[104] The delegation succeeded, even though prior Greek attempts to involve Rome in Greek affairs had been met with Roman apathy. Our primary source about these events, the surviving works of Polybius, do not state Rome's reason for getting involved. Rome gave Philip an ultimatum to cease his campaigns against Rome's new Greek allies. Doubting Rome's strength (a reasonable doubt, given Rome's performance in the First Macedonian War) Philip ignored the request, and Rome sent an army of Romans and Greek allies, beginning the Second Macedonian War.[105] Despite his recent successes against the Greeks and earlier successes against Rome, Philip's army buckled under the pressure from the Roman-Greek army. In 197, the Romans decisively defeated Philip at the Battle of Cynoscephalae, and Philip was forced to give up his recent Greek conquests.[106] The Romans declared the "Peace of the Greeks", believing that Philip's defeat now meant that Greece would be stable. They pulled out of Greece entirely, maintaining minimal contacts with their Greek allies.[107] With Egypt and Macedonia weakened, the Seleucid Empire made increasingly aggressive and successful attempts to conquer the entire Greek world.[108] Now not only Rome's allies against Philip, but even Philip himself, sought a Roman alliance against the Seleucids.[109] The situation was made worse by the fact that Hannibal was now a chief military advisor to the Seleucid emperor, and the two were believed to be planning an outright conquest not just of Greece, but of Rome itself.[110] The Seleucids were much stronger than the Macedonians had ever been, because they controlled much of the former Persian Empire, and by now had almost entirely reassembled Alexander the Great's former empire.[110] Roman bronze bust of Scipio Africanus, dated mid 1st century BC, and found in the Villa of the Papyri at Herculaneum[111] Fearing the worst, the Romans began a major mobilization, all but pulling out of recently pacified Spain and Gaul.[110] They even established a major garrison in Sicily in case the Seleucids ever got to Italy.[110] This fear was shared by Rome's Greek allies, who had largely ignored Rome in the years after the Second Macedonian War, but now followed Rome again for the first time since that war.[110] A major Roman-Greek force was mobilized under the command of the great hero of the Second Punic War, Scipio Africanus, and set out for Greece, beginning the Roman-Syrian War. After initial fighting that revealed serious Seleucid weaknesses, the Seleucids tried to turn the Roman strength against them at the Battle of Thermopylae (as they believed the 300 Spartans had done centuries earlier).[109] Like the Spartans, the Seleucids lost the battle, and were forced to evacuate Greece.[109] The Romans pursued the Seleucids by crossing the Hellespont, which marked the first time a Roman army had ever entered Asia.[109] The decisive engagement was fought at the Battle of Magnesia, resulting in a complete Roman victory.[109][112] The Seleucids sued for peace, and Rome forced them to give up their recent Greek conquests. Although they still controlled a great deal of territory, this defeat marked the decline of their empire, as they were to begin facing increasingly aggressive subjects in the east (the Parthians) and the west (the Greeks). Their empire disintegrated into a rump over the course of the next century, when it was eclipsed by Pontus. Following Magnesia, Rome again withdrew from Greece, assuming (or hoping) that the lack of a major Greek power would ensure a stable peace. In fact, it did the opposite.[113] Conquest of Greece (172–146 BC)[edit] Scene of the Battle of Corinth (146 BC): last day before the Roman legions looted and burned the Greek city of Corinth. The last day on Corinth, Tony Robert-Fleury, 1870 In 179 Philip died.[114] His talented and ambitious son, Perseus, took the throne and showed a renewed interest in conquering Greece.[115] With her Greek allies facing a major new threat, Rome declared war on Macedonia again, starting the Third Macedonian War. Perseus initially had some success against the Romans. However, Rome responded by sending a stronger army. This second consular army decisively defeated the Macedonians at the Battle of Pydna in 168[114][116] and the Macedonians duly capitulated, ending the war.[117] Convinced now that the Greeks (and therefore the rest of the region) would not have peace if left alone, Rome decided to establish its first permanent foothold in the Greek world, and divided the Kingdom of Macedonia into four client republics. Yet, Macedonian agitation continued. The Fourth Macedonian War, 150 to 148 BC, was fought against a Macedonian pretender to the throne who was again destabilizing Greece by trying to re-establish the old kingdom. The Romans swiftly defeated the Macedonians at the Second battle of Pydna. The Achaean League chose this moment to fight Rome but was swiftly defeated. In 146 (the same year as the destruction of Carthage), Corinth was besieged and destroyed in the Battle of Corinth (146 BC), which led to the league's surrender.[118] After nearly a century of constant crisis management in Greece, which always led back to internal instability and war when she withdrew, Rome decided to divide Macedonia into two new Roman provinces, Achaea and Macedonia. Third Punic War (149–146 BC)[edit] v t e Third Punic War Lake Tunis 1st Nepheris Port of Carthage 2nd Nepheris Carthage Carthage never recovered militarily after the Second Punic War,[119] but quickly did so economically and the Third Punic War that followed was in reality a simple punitive mission after the neighbouring Numidians allied to Rome robbed/attacked Carthaginian merchants. Treaties had forbidden any war with Roman allies, and defence against robbing/pirates was considered as "war action": Rome decided to annihilate the city of Carthage.[120] Carthage was almost defenceless, and submitted when besieged.[121] However, the Romans demanded complete surrender and removal of the city into the (desert) inland far off any coastal or harbour region, and the Carthaginians refused. The city was besieged, stormed, and completely destroyed. Ultimately, all of Carthage's North African and Iberian territories were acquired by Rome. Note that "Carthage" was not an 'empire', but a league of Punic colonies (port cities in the western Mediterranean) like the 1st and 2nd Athenian ("Attic") leagues, under leadership of Carthage. Punic Carthage was gone, but the other Punic cities in the western Mediterranean flourished under Roman rule. Social troubles and first civil war (146–60 BC)[edit] Rome's rapid expansion destabilized its social organization and triggered unrest in the heart of the Republic, which ultimately led to political violence, unrest in the provinces, and ultimately a breakdown in the traditional social relations of Rome that created the Augustan Empire. The period is marked by the rise of strongmen (Marius, Sulla, Pompey, Crassus, and Julius Caesar), who turned military success into political power. The Gracchi (133–121 BC)[edit] v t e Roman Servile Wars First Second Third Main article: Gracchi In 135, the first slave uprising, known as the First Servile War, broke out in Sicily. After initial successes, the slaves led by Eunus and Cleon were annihilated by the consul Publius Rupilius in 132 BC. In this context, Tiberius Gracchus was elected tribune in 133 BC. He attempted to enact a law which would have limited the amount of land that any individual could own. The aristocrats, who stood to lose an enormous amount of money, were bitterly opposed to this proposal. Tiberius submitted this law to the Plebeian Council, but the law was vetoed by a tribune named Marcus Octavius. Tiberius then used the Plebeian Council to impeach Octavius. The theory, that a representative of the people ceases to be one when he acts against the wishes of the people, was counter to Roman constitutional theory. If carried to its logical end, this theory would remove all constitutional restraints on the popular will, and put the state under the absolute control of a temporary popular majority.[122] His law was enacted, but Tiberius was murdered with 300 of his associates[123] when he stood for reelection to the tribunate. Tiberius' brother Gaius was elected tribune in 123. Gaius Gracchus' ultimate goal was to weaken the senate and to strengthen the democratic forces.[124] In the past, for example, the senate would eliminate political rivals either by establishing special judicial commissions or by passing a senatus consultum ultimum ("ultimate decree of the senate"). Both devices would allow the Senate to bypass the ordinary due process rights that all citizens had. Gaius outlawed the judicial commissions, and declared the senatus consultum ultimum to be unconstitutional. Gaius then proposed a law which would grant citizenship rights to Rome's Italian allies. This last proposal was not popular with the plebeians and he lost much of his support.[125] He stood for election to a third term in 121, but was defeated and then murdered by representatives of the senate with 3,000 of his supporters on Capitoline Hill in Rome.[123] In 121, the province of Gallia Narbonensis was established after the victory of Quintus Fabius Maximus over a coalition of Arverni and Allobroges in southern Gaul in 123. The city of Narbo was founded there in 118 by Lucius Licinius Crassus. Rise of Marius[edit] v t e Jugurthine War Cirta Suthul Muthul Zama Thala Muluccha 2nd Cirta Bust of Gaius Marius, instigator of the Marian reforms The Jugurthine War of 111–104 was fought between Rome and Jugurtha of the North African kingdom of Numidia. It constituted the final Roman pacification of Northern Africa,[126] after which Rome largely ceased expansion on the continent after reaching natural barriers of desert and mountain. Following Jugurtha's usurpation of the throne of Numidia,[127] a loyal ally of Rome since the Punic Wars,[128] Rome felt compelled to intervene. Jugurtha impudently bribed the Romans into accepting his usurpation. Jugurtha was finally captured not in battle but by treachery. Denarius of Faustus Cornelius Sulla, 56 BC. It shows Diana on the obverse, while the reverse depicts Sulla being offered an olive branch by his ally Bocchus I. Jugurtha is shown captive on the right.[129] In 118, King Micipsa of Numidia (current-day Algeria and Tunisia) died. He was succeeded by two legitimate sons, Adherbal and Hiempsal, and an illegitimate son, Jugurtha. Micipsa divided his kingdom between these three sons. Jugurtha, however, turned on his brothers, killing Hiempsal and driving Adherbal out of Numidia. Adherbal fled to Rome for assistance, and initially Rome mediated a division of the country between the two brothers. Eventually, Jugurtha renewed his offensive, leading to a long and inconclusive war with Rome. He also bribed several Roman commanders, and at least two tribunes, before and during the war. His nemesis, Gaius Marius, a legate from a virtually unknown provincial family, returned from the war in Numidia and was elected consul in 107 over the objections of the aristocratic senators. Marius invaded Numidia and brought the war to a quick end, capturing Jugurtha in the process. The apparent incompetence of the Senate, and the brilliance of Marius, had been put on full display.[130] The populares party took full advantage of this opportunity by allying itself with Marius. v t e Cimbrian War Noreia Burdigala Arausio Tridentum Aquae Sextiae Vercellae The Cimbrian War (113–101) was a far more serious affair than the earlier clashes of 121. The Germanic tribes of the Cimbri and the Teutons[131] migrated from northern Europe into Rome's northern territories,[132] and clashed with Rome and her allies.[133] At the Battle of Aquae Sextiae and the Battle of Vercellae both tribes were virtually annihilated, which ended the threat. Sulla's Civil Wars[edit] v t e Ancient unification of Italy Roman–Etruscan Wars Roman–Latin wars Roman–Volscian wars Roman conquest of the Hernici Samnite Wars Pyrrhic War Social War v t e First Mithridatic War Amnias Protopachium Mount Scorobas Rhodes Athens and Piraeus Chaeronea Tenedos Orchomenus v t e Sulla's second civil war Mount Tifata Asio River Sacriporto Sena Gálica Saturnia Glanis River Espolecio 1 Clusium 1 Espolecio 2 Faventia Fidentia Clusium 2 Colline Gate Praeneste Neápolis Utica Norba Caesarina Nola Volterras In 91 the Social War broke out between Rome and its former allies in Italy when the allies complained that they shared the risk of Rome's military campaigns, but not its rewards. Although they lost militarily, the allies achieved their objectives with legal proclamations which granted citizenship to more than 500,000 Italians. The internal unrest reached its most serious state, however, in the two civil wars that were caused by the clash between generals Gaius Marius and Lucius Cornelius Sulla starting from 88. In the Battle of the Colline Gate[134] at the very door of the city of Rome, a Roman army under Sulla bested an army of the Marius supporters and entered the city. Sulla's actions marked a watershed in the willingness of Roman troops to wage war against one another that was to pave the way for the wars which ultimately overthrew the Republic, and caused the founding of the Roman Empire. Several years later, in 88, a Roman army was sent to put down an emerging Asian power, king Mithridates of Pontus. The army, however, was not defeated and won. One of Marius' old quaestors, Lucius Cornelius Sulla, had been elected consul for the year, and was ordered by the senate to assume command of the war against Mithridates. Marius, a member of the "populares" party, had a tribune revoke Sulla's command of the war against Mithridates. Sulla, a member of the aristocratic ("optimates") party, brought his army back to Italy and marched on Rome. Sulla was so angry at Marius' tribune that he passed a law intended to permanently weaken the tribunate.[135] He then returned to his war against Mithridates. With Sulla gone, the populares under Marius and Lucius Cornelius Cinna soon took control of the city. During the period in which the populares party controlled the city, they flouted convention by re-electing Marius consul several times without observing the customary ten-year interval between offices.[136] They also transgressed the established oligarchy by advancing unelected individuals to magisterial office, and by substituting magisterial edicts for popular legislation. Sulla soon made peace with Mithridates. In 83, he returned to Rome, overcame all resistance, and recaptured the city. Sulla and his supporters then slaughtered most of Marius' supporters. Sulla, having observed the violent results of radical popular reforms, was naturally conservative. As such, he sought to strengthen the aristocracy, and by extension the senate.[137] Sulla made himself dictator, passed a series of constitutional reforms, resigned the dictatorship, and served one last term as consul. He died in 78. v t e Second Mithridatic War Magnesia on the Maeander Amasra Halys v t e Roman–Parthian Wars Carrhae Campaign (53 BC) Caesar's planned invasion (44 BC) Pompeian–Parthian invasion (40–38 BC) Antony's Parthian War (40–33 BC) War over Armenia (58–63) Trajan's Parthian campaign (115–117) War of 161–166 Campaign of Septimius Severus (198) Caracalla's Parthian War (216–217) Pompey's dominance[edit] See also: Second Catilinarian conspiracy The third and final slave uprising was the most serious,[138] involving ultimately between 120,000[139] and 150,000[140] slaves under the command of the gladiator Spartacus. v t e Third Mithridatic War Chalcedon Cyzicus Rhyndacus Lemnos Heraclea Cabira Tigranocerta Artaxata Zela Lycus Pelorus Abas Jerusalem Mithridates the Great was the ruler of Pontus,[141] a large kingdom in Asia Minor (modern Turkey), from 120 to 63. Mithridates antagonised Rome by seeking to expand his kingdom,[141] and Rome for its part seemed equally eager for war and the spoils and prestige that it might bring.[141][142] In 88, Mithridates ordered the killing of a majority of the 80,000 Romans living in his kingdom.[143] The massacre was the official reason given for the commencement of hostilities in the First Mithridatic War. The Roman general Lucius Cornelius Sulla forced Mithridates out of Greece proper, but then had to return to Italy to answer the internal threat posed by his rival, Gaius Marius. A peace was made between Rome and Pontus, but this proved only a temporary lull. The Second Mithridatic War began when Rome tried to annex a province that Mithridates claimed as his own. In the Third Mithridatic War, first Lucius Licinius Lucullus and then Pompey the Great were sent against Mithridates and his Armenian ally Tigranes the Great.[144] Mithridates was finally defeated by Pompey in the night-time Battle of the Lycus.[145] v t e Rome against the Cilician pirates Korakesion The Mediterranean had at this time fallen into the hands of pirates,[145] largely from Cilicia.[146] The pirates not only strangled shipping lanes but also plundered many cities on the coasts of Greece and Asia. Pompey was nominated as commander of a special naval task force to campaign against the pirates.[144][145] It took Pompey just forty days to clear the western portion of the sea of pirates and restore communication between Iberia (Spain), Africa, and Italy. In 77, the senate sent one of Sulla's former lieutenants, Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus ("Pompey the Great"), to put down an uprising in Hispania. By 71, Pompey returned to Rome after having completed his mission. Around the same time, another of Sulla's former lieutenants, Marcus Licinius Crassus, had just put down the Spartacus-led gladiator/slave revolt in Italy. Upon their return, Pompey and Crassus found the populares party fiercely attacking Sulla's constitution.[147] They attempted to forge an agreement with the populares party. If both Pompey and Crassus were elected consul in 70, they would dismantle the more obnoxious components of Sulla's constitution. The two were soon elected, and quickly dismantled most of Sulla's constitution.[148] A Roman marble bust of Marcus Tullius Cicero, Musei Capitolini, Rome Around 66, a movement to use constitutional, or at least peaceful, means to address the plight of various classes began.[149] After several failures, the movement's leaders decided to use any means that were necessary to accomplish their goals. The movement coalesced under an aristocrat named Lucius Sergius Catilina. The movement was based in the town of Faesulae, which was a natural hotbed of agrarian agitation.[150] The rural malcontents were to advance on Rome,[151] and be aided by an uprising within the city. After assassinating the consuls and most of the senators, Catiline would be free to enact his reforms. The conspiracy was set in motion in 63. The consul for the year, Marcus Tullius Cicero, intercepted messages that Catiline had sent in an attempt to recruit more members. As a result, the top conspirators in Rome (including at least one former consul) were executed by authorisation (of dubious constitutionality) of the senate, and the planned uprising was disrupted. Cicero then sent an army, which cut Catiline's forces to pieces. The most important result of the Catilinarian conspiracy was that the populares party became discredited. The prior 70 years had witnessed a gradual erosion in senatorial powers. The violent nature of the conspiracy, in conjunction with the senate's skill in disrupting it, did a great deal to repair the senate's image.[151] Triumvirates and end of the Republic (60–27 BC)[edit] First Triumvirate (60–50 BC)[edit] Part of a series on Ancient Rome and the fall of the Republic People Mark Antony Augustus Brutus Cato Cicero Cleopatra Clodius Pulcher Crassus Lepidus Pompey Sextus Pompey Events First Triumvirate Caesar's Civil War Assassination of Caesar Second Triumvirate Liberators' Civil War Sicilian Revolt Final War of the Roman Republic Places Caesareum Comitium Curia Julia Curia Hostilia Rostra Theatre of Pompey v t e Main article: First Triumvirate A Roman marble head of Pompey (now in the Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek) In 62, Pompey returned victorious from Asia. The Senate, elated by its successes against Catiline, refused to ratify the arrangements that Pompey had made. Pompey, in effect, became powerless. Thus, when Julius Caesar returned from a governorship in Spain in 61, he found it easy to make an arrangement with Pompey. Caesar and Pompey, along with Marcus Licinius Crassus, established a private agreement, now known as the First Triumvirate. Under the agreement, Pompey's arrangements would be ratified. Caesar would be elected consul in 59, and would then serve as governor of Gaul for five years. Crassus was promised a future consulship.[152][153] Caesar's consular colleague in 59, Marcus Calpurnius Bibulus, was an extreme aristocrat. Caesar submitted the laws that he had promised Pompey to the assemblies. Bibulus attempted to obstruct the enactment of these laws, and so Caesar used violent means to ensure their passage.[152] Caesar was then made governor of three provinces. He facilitated the election of the former patrician Publius Clodius Pulcher to the tribunate for 58. Clodius set about depriving Caesar's senatorial enemies of two of their more obstinate leaders in Cato and Cicero. Clodius was a bitter opponent of Cicero because Cicero had testified against him in a sacrilege case. Clodius attempted to try Cicero for executing citizens without a trial during the Catiline conspiracy, resulting in Cicero going into self-imposed exile and his house in Rome being burnt down. Clodius also passed a bill that forced Cato to lead the invasion of Cyprus which would keep him away from Rome for some years. Clodius also passed a law to expand the previous partial grain subsidy to a fully free grain dole for citizens.[154] Map of the Gallic Wars v t e Gallic Wars Magetobriga (63 BC) Arar (58 BC) Bibracte (58 BC) Vosges (58 BC) Axona (57 BC) Sabis (57 BC) Atuatuci (57 BC) Octodurus (57–56 BC) Britain (55-54 BC) Ambiorix's revolt (54–53 BC) Avaricum (52 BC) Gergovia (52 BC) Lutetia (52 BC) Alesia (52 BC) Uxellodunum (51 BC) During his term as praetor in the Iberian Peninsula (modern Portugal and Spain), Pompey's contemporary Julius Caesar defeated two local tribes in battle.[155] After his term as consul in 59, he was appointed to a five-year term as the proconsular Governor of Cisalpine Gaul (part of current northern Italy), Transalpine Gaul (current southern France) and Illyria (part of the modern Balkans).[155][156] Not content with an idle governorship, Caesar strove to find reason to invade Gaul (modern France and Belgium), which would give him the dramatic military success he sought. When two local tribes began to migrate on a route that would take them near (not into) the Roman province of Transalpine Gaul, Caesar had the barely sufficient excuse he needed for his Gallic Wars, fought between 58 and 49. Caesar defeated large armies at major battles 58 and 57. In 55 and 54 he made two expeditions into Britain, the first Roman to do so. Caesar then defeated a union of Gauls at the Battle of Alesia,[157] completing the Roman conquest of Transalpine Gaul. By 50, all of Gaul lay in Roman hands. Clodius formed armed gangs that terrorised the city and eventually began to attack Pompey's followers, who in response funded counter-gangs formed by Titus Annius Milo. The political alliance of the triumvirate was crumbling. Domitius Ahenobarbus ran for the consulship in 55 promising to take Caesar's command from him. Eventually, the triumvirate was renewed at Lucca. Pompey and Crassus were promised the consulship in 55, and Caesar's term as governor was extended for five years. Beginning in the summer of 54, a wave of political corruption and violence swept Rome.[158] This chaos reached a climax in January of 52 BC, when Clodius was murdered in a gang war by Milo. In 53, Crassus launched a Roman invasion of the Parthian Empire (modern Iraq and Iran). After initial successes,[159] he marched his army deep into the desert;[160] but here his army was cut off deep in enemy territory, surrounded and slaughtered at the Battle of Carrhae in which Crassus himself perished. The death of Crassus removed some of the balance in the Triumvirate and, consequently, Caesar and Pompey began to move apart. While Caesar was fighting in Gaul, Pompey proceeded with a legislative agenda for Rome that revealed that he was at best ambivalent towards Caesar[161] and perhaps now covertly allied with Caesar's political enemies. Pompey's wife, Julia, who was Caesar's daughter, died in childbirth. This event severed the last remaining bond between Pompey and Caesar. In 51, some Roman senators demanded that Caesar not be permitted to stand for consul unless he turned over control of his armies to the state, which would have left Caesar defenceless before his enemies. Caesar chose civil war over laying down his command and facing trial. Caesar's Civil War and dictatorship (49–44 BC)[edit] v t e Caesar's Civil War Corfinium Brundisium Curicta Massilia (land) Ilerda Massilia (naval) Tauroento Utica Bagradas Salona Dyrrhachium Gomphi Pharsalus Nicopolis Alexandria Tauris Nile Zela Ruspina Thapsus Hippo Regius Carteia Munda Corduba Lauro Apamea Baetis The Curia Julia, the Roman Senate house established by Julius Caesar in 44 BC and completed by Octavian in 29 BC, replacing the Curia Cornelia as the meeting place of the Senate Main article: Assassination of Julius Caesar On 1 January 49, an agent of Caesar presented an ultimatum to the senate. The ultimatum was rejected, and the senate then passed a resolution which declared that if Caesar did not lay down his arms by July of that year, he would be considered an enemy of the Republic.[162] Meanwhile, the senators adopted Pompey as their new champion against Caesar. On 7 January of 49, the senate passed a senatus consultum ultimum, which vested Pompey with dictatorial powers. Pompey's army, however, was composed largely of untested conscripts. On 10 January, Caesar with his veteran army crossed the river Rubicon, the legal boundary of Roman Italy beyond which no commander might bring his army, in violation of Roman laws, and by the spring of 49 swept down the Italian peninsula towards Rome. Caesar's rapid advance forced Pompey, the consuls and the senate to abandon Rome for Greece. Caesar entered the city unopposed. Afterwards Caesar turned his attention to the Pompeian stronghold of Hispania (modern Spain)[163] but decided to tackle Pompey himself in Greece.[164] Pompey initially defeated Caesar, but failed to follow up on the victory, and was decisively defeated at the Battle of Pharsalus in 48,[165] despite outnumbering Caesar's forces two to one, albeit with inferior quality troops.[166] Pompey fled again, this time to Egypt, where he was murdered. Pompey's death did not end the civil war, as Caesar's many enemies fought on. In 46 Caesar lost perhaps as much as a third of his army, but ultimately came back to defeat the Pompeian army of Metellus Scipio in the Battle of Thapsus, after which the Pompeians retreated yet again to Hispania. Caesar then defeated the combined Pompeian forces at the Battle of Munda. The Tusculum portrait, a Roman sculpture of Julius Caesar, Archaeological Museum of Turin, Italy With Pompey defeated and order restored, Caesar wanted to achieve undisputed control over the government. The powers which he gave himself were later assumed by his imperial successors.[167] His assumption of these powers decreased the authority of Rome's other political institutions. Caesar held both the dictatorship and the tribunate, and alternated between the consulship and the proconsulship.[167] In 48, Caesar was given permanent tribunician powers. This made his person sacrosanct, gave him the power to veto the senate, and allowed him to dominate the Plebeian Council. In 46, Caesar was given censorial powers,[168] which he used to fill the senate with his own partisans. Caesar then raised the membership of the Senate to 900.[169] This robbed the senatorial aristocracy of its prestige, and made it increasingly subservient to him. While the assemblies continued to meet, he submitted all candidates to them for election, as well as all bills for enactment. Thus, the group became powerless and were unable to oppose him.[clarification needed][170] Near the end of his life, Caesar began to prepare for a war against the Parthian Empire. Since his absence from Rome would limit his ability to install his own consuls, he passed a law before his death which allowed him to appoint all magistrates, and later all consuls and tribunes. This transformed the magistrates from representatives of the people to representatives of the dictator.[169] Caesar was now the primary figure of the Roman state, enforcing and entrenching his powers. His enemies feared that he had ambitions to become an autocratic ruler. Arguing that the Roman Republic was in danger, a group of senators led by Gaius Cassius and Marcus Brutus hatched a conspiracy and assassinated Caesar at a meeting of the Senate on 15 March 44.[171] Most of the conspirators were senators, who had a variety of economic, political, or personal motivations for carrying out the assassination. Many were afraid that Caesar would soon resurrect the monarchy and declare himself king. Others feared loss of property or prestige as Caesar carried out his land reforms in favor of the landless classes. Virtually all the conspirators fled the city after Caesar's death in fear of retaliation. The civil war that followed destroyed what was left of the Republic.[172] Second Triumvirate[edit] This mid-1st-century-BC Roman wall painting in Pompeii is probably a depiction of Cleopatra VII as Venus Genetrix, with her son Caesarion as Cupid. Its owner Marcus Fabius Rufus most likely ordered its concealment behind a wall in reaction to the execution of Caesarion on orders of Octavian in 30 BC.[173][174] After the assassination, Marcus Antonius (Mark Antony) formed an alliance with Caesar's adopted son and great-nephew, Gaius Octavianus (Octavian), along with Marcus Lepidus. Known as the Second Triumvirate,[175] they held powers that were nearly identical to the powers that Caesar had held under his constitution. As such, the Senate and assemblies remained powerless, even after Caesar had been assassinated. The conspirators were then defeated at the Battle of Philippi in 42. Although Brutus defeated Octavian, Antony defeated Cassius, who committed suicide. Brutus did likewise soon afterwards. However, civil war flared again when the alliance failed. The ambitious Octavian built a power base of patronage and then launched a campaign against Mark Antony.[171] At the naval Battle of Actium in 31 off the coast of Greece, Octavian decisively defeated Antony and Cleopatra of Ptolemaic Egypt. Octavian was granted a series of special powers including sole "imperium" within the city of Rome, permanent consular powers and credit for every Roman military victory, since all future generals were assumed to be acting under his command. In 27 Octavian was granted the use of the names "Augustus", indicating his primary status above all other Romans, "Princeps", which he used to refer to himself as in public, and he adopted the title "Imperator Caesar" making him the first Roman Emperor.[176] Constitutional system[edit] Main article: Constitution of the Roman Republic Main article: History of the Constitution of the Roman Republic Further information: Elections in the Roman Republic The constitutional history of the Roman Republic began with the revolution which overthrew the monarchy in 509 BC, and ended with constitutional reforms that transformed the Republic into what would effectively be the Roman Empire, in 27 BC. The Constitution of the Roman Republic was a constantly-evolving, unwritten set of guidelines and principles passed down mainly through precedent, by which the government and its politics operated.[177] Throughout the history of the Republic, changes in the constitution were driven by conflicts of interest between the aristocracy and ordinary citizens. Senate[edit] Main article: Senate of the Roman Republic The senate's ultimate authority derived from the esteem and prestige of the senators.[178] This esteem and prestige was based on both precedent and custom, as well as the caliber and reputation of the senators. The senate passed decrees, which were called senatus consulta. These were officially "advice" from the senate to a magistrate. In practice, however, they were usually followed by the magistrates.[179] The focus of the Roman senate was usually directed towards foreign policy. Though it technically had no official role in the management of military conflict, the senate ultimately was the force that oversaw such affairs. This was due to the senate's explicit power over the state's budget and in military affairs.[180] The power of the senate expanded over time as the power of the legislative assemblies declined, and the senate took a greater role in ordinary law-making. Its members were usually appointed by Roman Censors, who ordinarily selected newly elected magistrates for membership in the senate, making the senate a partially elected body. During times of military emergency, such as the civil wars of the 1st century, this practice became less prevalent, as the Roman Dictator, Triumvir or the senate itself would select its members. Towards the end of the Republic, the senate could enact a senatus consultus ultimum in times of emergency, instead of appointing a dictator.[citation needed] Legislative assemblies[edit] The Roman Forum, the commercial, cultural, religious, and political center of the city and the Republic which housed the various offices and meeting places of the government Main article: Legislative Assemblies of the Roman Republic The legal status of Roman citizenship was limited and was a vital prerequisite to possessing many important legal rights such as the right to trial and appeal, to marry, to vote, to hold office, to enter binding contracts, and to special tax exemptions. An adult male citizen with the full complement of legal and political rights was called "optimo jure." The optimo jure elected their assemblies, whereupon the assemblies elected magistrates, enacted legislation, presided over trials in capital cases, declared war and peace, and forged or dissolved treaties. There were two types of legislative assemblies. The first was the comitia ("committees"),[181] which were assemblies of all optimo jure. The second was the concilia ("councils"), which were assemblies of specific groups of optimo jure.[182] Citizens were organized on the basis of centuries and tribes, which would each gather into their own assemblies. The Comitia Centuriata ("Centuriate Assembly") was the assembly of the centuries (i.e., soldiers). The president of the Comitia Centuriata was usually a consul. The centuries would vote, one at a time, until a measure received support from a majority of the centuries. The Comitia Centuriata would elect magistrates who had the imperium powers (consuls and praetors). It also elected censors. Only the Comitia Centuriata could declare war, and ratify the results of a census.[183] It also served as the highest court of appeal in certain judicial cases. The assembly of the tribes (i.e., the citizens of Rome), the Comitia Tributa, was presided over by a consul, and was composed of 35 tribes. The tribes were not ethnic or kinship groups, but rather geographical subdivisions.[184] The order that the thirty-five tribes would vote in was selected randomly by lot.[185] Once a measure received support from a majority of the tribes, the voting would end. While it did not pass many laws, the Comitia Tributa did elect quaestors, curule aediles, and military tribunes.[186] The Plebeian Council[187] was identical to the assembly of the tribes, but excluded the patricians. They elected their own officers, plebeian tribunes and plebeian aediles. Usually a plebeian tribune would preside over the assembly. This assembly passed most laws, and could also act as a court of appeal. Magistrates[edit] Main article: Executive magistrates of the Roman Republic Each republican magistrate held certain constitutional powers. Each was assigned a provincia by the Senate. This was the scope of that particular office holder's authority. It could apply to a geographic area or to a particular responsibility or task.[188] The powers of a magistrate came from the people of Rome (both plebeians and patricians).[189] The imperium was held by both consuls and praetors. Strictly speaking, it was the authority to command a military force. In reality, however, it carried broad authority in the other public spheres such as diplomacy, and the justice system. In extreme cases, those with the imperium power were able to sentence Roman Citizens to death. All magistrates also had the power of coercitio (coercion). This was used by magistrates to maintain public order by imposing punishment for crimes.[190] Magistrates also had both the power and the duty to look for omens. This power could also be used to obstruct political opponents. One check on a magistrate's power was called Collega (collegiality). Each magisterial office would be held concurrently by at least two people. Another such check was provocatio. While in Rome, all citizens were protected from coercion, by provocatio, which was an early form of due process. It was a precursor to habeas corpus. If any magistrate tried to use the powers of the state against a citizen, that citizen could appeal the decision of the magistrate to a tribune. In addition, once a magistrate's one-year term of office expired, he would have to wait ten years before serving in that office again. This created problems for some consuls and praetors, and these magistrates would occasionally have their imperium extended. In effect, they would retain the powers of the office (as a promagistrate), without officially holding that office.[191] The consuls of the Roman Republic were the highest ranking ordinary magistrates. Each served for one year.[192] They retained several elements of the former kingly regalia, such as the toga praetexta, and the fasces, which represented the power to inflict physical punishment. Consular powers included the kings' former "power to command" (imperium) and appointment of new senators. Consuls had supreme power in both civil and military matters. While in the city of Rome, the consuls were the head of the Roman government. They would preside over the senate and the assemblies. While abroad, each consul would command an army.[193] His authority abroad would be nearly absolute. Praetors administered civil law[194] and commanded provincial armies. Every five years, two censors were elected for an 18-month term, during which they would conduct a census. During the census, they could enroll citizens in the senate, or purge them from the senate.[195] Aediles were officers elected to conduct domestic affairs in Rome, such as managing public games and shows. The quaestors would usually assist the consuls in Rome, and the governors in the provinces. Their duties were often financial. Since the tribunes were considered to be the embodiment of the plebeians, they were sacrosanct. Their sacrosanctity was enforced by a pledge, taken by the plebeians, to kill any person who harmed or interfered with a tribune during his term of office. It was a capital offense to harm a tribune, to disregard his veto, or to otherwise interfere with him.[196] In times of military emergency, a dictator would be appointed for a term of six months.[197] Constitutional government would be dissolved, and the dictator would be the absolute master of the state. When the dictator's term ended, constitutional government would be restored. Military[edit] Part of a series on the Military of ancient Rome 753 BC – AD 476 Structural history Army Unit types and ranks Decorations and punishments Legions Auxilia Generals Navy Fleets Admirals Campaign history Wars and battles Technological history Military engineering Castra Siege engines Triumphal arches Roads Political history   Strategy and tactics Infantry tactics Frontiers and fortifications Limes Limes Britannicus Antonine Wall Hadrian's Wall Saxon Shore Limes Germanicus Alb Limes Lauter Valley Limes Lower Germanic Limes Main Limes Neckar-Odenwald Limes Upper Germanic-Rhaetian Limes Wetterau Limes Danube–Iller–Rhine Limes Norican Limes Claustra Alpium Iuliarum Pannonian Limes Limes Alutanus Limes Moesiae Trajan's Wall Anastasian Wall Limes Sarmatiae Limes Arabicus Limes Tripolitanus Limes Mauretaniae  Ancient Rome portal •  War portal v t e Main article: Structural history of the Roman military Rome's military secured Rome's territory and borders, and helped to impose tribute on conquered peoples. Rome's armies had a formidable reputation; but Rome also "produced [its] share of incompetents"[198] and catastrophic defeats. Nevertheless, it was generally the fate of Rome's greatest enemies, such as Pyrrhus and Hannibal,[199] to win early battles but lose the war. Hoplite armies (509–c. 315 BC)[edit] Main article: Phalanx During this period, Roman soldiers seem to have been modelled after those of the Etruscans to the north,[200] who themselves are believed to have copied their style of warfare from the Greeks. Traditionally, the introduction of the phalanx formation into the Roman army is ascribed to the city's penultimate king, Servius Tullius (ruled 578–534).[201] According to Livy[202] and Dionysius of Halicarnassus,[203] the front rank was composed of the wealthiest citizens, who were able to purchase the best equipment. Each subsequent rank consisted of those with less wealth and poorer equipment than the one before it. The phalanx was effective in large, open spaces, but not on the hilly terrain of the central Italian peninsula. In the 4th century, the Romans replaced it with the more flexible manipular formation. This change is sometimes attributed to Marcus Furius Camillus and placed shortly after the Gallic invasion of 390; more likely, it was copied from Rome's Samnite enemies to the south,[204] following the Second Samnite War (326–304).[205] Manipular legion (c. 315–107 BC)[edit] Detail from the Ahenobarbus relief showing (centre-right) two Roman foot-soldiers c. 122 BC. Note the Montefortino-style helmets with horsehair plume, chain mail cuirasses with shoulder reinforcement, oval shields with calfskin covers, gladius and pilum. During this period, an army formation of around 5,000 men (of both heavy and light infantry) was known as a legion. The manipular army was based upon social class, age and military experience.[206] Maniples were units of 120 men each drawn from a single infantry class. They were typically deployed into three discrete lines based on the three heavy infantry types: The first line maniple were the hastati, leather-armoured infantry soldiers who wore a bronze breastplate and a bronze helmet adorned with 3 feathers approximately 30 cm (12 in) in height and carried an iron-clad wooden shield. They were armed with a sword and two throwing spears. The second line were the principes. They were armed and armoured in the same manner as the hastati, but wore a lighter coat of mail rather than a solid brass breastplate. The triarii formed the third line. They were the last remnant of the hoplite-style troops in the Roman army. They were armed and armoured like the principes, with the exception that they carried a lighter spear.[207] The three infantry classes[208] may have retained some slight parallel to social divisions within Roman society, but at least officially the three lines were based upon age and experience rather than social class. Young, unproven men would serve in the first line, older men with some military experience would serve in the second line, and veteran troops of advanced age and experience would serve in the third line. The heavy infantry of the maniples were supported by a number of light infantry and cavalry troops, typically 300 horsemen per manipular legion.[208] The cavalry was drawn primarily from the richest class of equestrians. There was an additional class of troops who followed the army without specific martial roles and were deployed to the rear of the third line. Their role in accompanying the army was primarily to supply any vacancies that might occur in the maniples. The light infantry consisted of 1,200 unarmoured skirmishing troops drawn from the youngest and lower social classes. They were armed with a sword and a small shield, as well as several light javelins. Rome's military confederation with the other peoples of the Italian peninsula meant that half of Rome's army was provided by the Socii, such as the Etruscans, Umbrians, Apulians, Campanians, Samnites, Lucani, Bruttii, and the various southern Greek cities. Polybius states that Rome could draw on 770,000 men at the beginning of the Second Punic War, of which 700,000 were infantry and 70,000 met the requirements for cavalry. Rome's Italian allies would be organized in alae, or wings, roughly equal in manpower to the Roman legions, though with 900 cavalry instead of 300. The "Togatus Barberini", depicting a Roman senator holding the imagines (effigies) of deceased ancestors in his hands; marble, late 1st century BC; head (not belonging): mid 1st century BC A small navy had operated at a fairly low level after about 300, but it was massively upgraded about forty years later, during the First Punic War. After a period of frenetic construction, the navy mushroomed to a size of more than 400 ships on the Carthaginian ("Punic") pattern. Once completed, it could accommodate up to 100,000 sailors and embarked troops for battle. The navy thereafter declined in size.[209] The extraordinary demands of the Punic Wars, in addition to a shortage of manpower, exposed the tactical weaknesses of the manipular legion, at least in the short term.[210] In 217, near the beginning of the Second Punic War, Rome was forced to effectively ignore its long-standing principle that its soldiers must be both citizens and property owners. During the 2nd century, Roman territory saw an overall decline in population,[211] partially due to the huge losses incurred during various wars. This was accompanied by severe social stresses and the greater collapse of the middle classes. As a result, the Roman state was forced to arm its soldiers at the expense of the state, which it did not have to do in the past. The distinction between the heavy infantry types began to blur, perhaps because the state was now assuming the responsibility of providing standard-issue equipment. In addition, the shortage of available manpower led to a greater burden being placed upon Rome's allies for the provision of allied troops.[212] Eventually, the Romans were forced to begin hiring mercenaries to fight alongside the legions.[213] Legion after the reforms of Gaius Marius (107–27 BC)[edit] Main article: Roman army of the late Republic In a process known as the Marian reforms, Roman consul Gaius Marius carried out a programme of reform of the Roman military.[214] In 107, all citizens, regardless of their wealth or social class, were made eligible for entry into the Roman army. This move formalised and concluded a gradual process that had been growing for centuries, of removing property requirements for military service.[215] The distinction among the three heavy infantry classes, which had already become blurred, had collapsed into a single class of heavy legionary infantry. The heavy infantry legionaries were drawn from citizen stock, while non-citizens came to dominate the ranks of the light infantry. The army's higher-level officers and commanders were still drawn exclusively from the Roman aristocracy.[216] Unlike earlier in the Republic, legionaries were no longer fighting on a seasonal basis to protect their land. Instead, they received standard pay, and were employed by the state on a fixed-term basis. As a consequence, military duty began to appeal most to the poorest sections of society, to whom a salaried pay was attractive. A destabilising consequence of this development was that the proletariat "acquired a stronger and more elevated position"[217] within the state. The legions of the late Republic were almost entirely heavy infantry. The main legionary sub-unit was a cohort of approximately 480 infantrymen, further divided into six centuries of 80 men each.[218] Each century comprised 10 "tent groups" of 8 men. Cavalry were used as scouts and dispatch riders, rather than as battlefield forces.[219] Legions also contained a dedicated group of artillery crew of perhaps 60 men. Each legion was normally partnered with an approximately equal number of allied (non-Roman) troops.[220] The army's most obvious deficiency lay in its shortage of cavalry, especially heavy cavalry.[221] Particularly in the East, Rome's slow-moving infantry legions were often confronted by fast-moving cavalry-troops, and found themselves at a tactical disadvantage. A Roman naval bireme depicted in a relief from the Temple of Fortuna Primigenia in Praeneste,[222] c. 120 BC;[223] now in the Museo Pio-Clementino in the Vatican Museums Temple of Janus as seen in the present church of San Nicola in Carcere, in the Forum Holitorium of Rome, Italy, dedicated by Gaius Duilius after his naval victory at the Battle of Mylae in 260 BC[224] Following Rome's subjugation of the Mediterranean, its navy declined in size although it would undergo short-term upgrading and revitalisation in the late Republic to meet several new demands. Julius Caesar assembled a fleet to cross the English Channel and invade Britannia. Pompey raised a fleet to deal with the Cilician pirates who threatened Rome's Mediterranean trading routes. During the civil war that followed, as many as a thousand ships were either constructed or pressed into service from Greek cities.[209] Social structure[edit] Main article: Social class in ancient Rome Citizen families were headed by the family's oldest male, the pater familias, who was lawfully entitled to exercise complete authority (patria potestas) over family property and all family members. Brutus, co-founder of the Republic, is supposed to have exercised the extreme form of this right when he executed his own sons for treachery.[225] Citizenship offered legal protection and rights, but citizens who offended Rome's traditional moral code could be declared infamous, and lose certain legal and social privileges.[226] Citizenship was also taxable, and undischarged debt was potentially a capital offence. A form of limited, theoretically voluntary slavery (debt bondage, or nexum) allowed wealthy creditors to negotiate payment of debt through bonded service. Poor, landless citizens of the lowest class (proletarii) might contract their sons to a creditor, patron or third party employer to obtain an income, or to pay off family debts. Nexum was only abolished when slave labour became more readily available, most notably during the Punic wars.[227][228][229] An inscribed funerary relief of Aurelius Hermia and his wife Aurelia Philematum, former slaves who married after their manumission, 80 BC, from a tomb along the Via Nomentana in Rome Slaves were simultaneously family members and family property. They could be bought, sold, acquired through warfare, or born and raised within their master's household,. They could also buy their freedom with money saved or the offer of future services as a freedman or woman, and their sons could be eligible for citizenship; this degree of social mobility was unusual in the ancient world. Freed slaves and the master who freed them retained certain legal and moral mutual obligations. This was the bottom rung of one of Rome's fundamental social and economic institutions, the client-patron relationship. At the top rung were the senatorial families of the landowning nobility, both patrician and plebeian, bound by shifting allegiances and mutual competition. A plebiscite of 218 forbade senators and their sons to engage in substantial trade or money-lending.[230][231] A wealthy equestrian class emerged, not subject to the same trading constraints as the senate.[232] Citizen men and citizen women were expected to marry, produce as many children as possible, and improve – or at worst, conserve – their family's wealth, fortune, and public profile. Marriage offered opportunities for political alliance and social advancement. Patricians usually married in a form known as confarreatio, which transferred the bride from her father's absolute control or "hand" (manus) to that of her husband.[233] Patrician status could only be inherited through birth; an early law, introduced by the reactionary Decemviri but rescinded in 445, sought to prevent marriages between patricians and plebeians; any resulting offspring may not have been legally recognised.[234] Among ordinary plebeians, different marriage forms offered married women considerable more freedom than their patrician counterparts, until manus marriage was replaced by free marriage, in which the wife remained under the legal authority of her absent father, not her husband.[235] Infant mortality was high. Towards the end of the Republic, the birthrate began to fall among the elite. Some wealthy, childless citizens resorted to adoption to provide male heirs for their estates, and to forge political alliances. Adoption was subject to the senate's approval; the notoriously unconventional patrician politician Publius Clodius Pulcher had himself and his family adopted into a plebeian clan, so that he could hold a plebeian tribunate. Trade and economy[edit] Farming[edit] Main article: Roman agriculture The Republic was created during a time of warfare, economic recession, food shortages, and plebeian debt. In wartime, plebeian farmers were liable to conscription. In peacetime, most depended on whatever cereal crops they could produce on small farming plots, allotted to them by the state, or by patrons. Soil fertility varied from place to place, and natural water sources were unevenly distributed throughout the landscape. In good years, a pleb small-holder might trade a small surplus, to meet his family's needs, or to buy the armatures required for his military service. In other years, crop failure through soil exhaustion, adverse weather, disease or military incursions could lead to poverty, unsupported borrowing, and debt. Nobles invested much of their wealth in ever-larger, more efficient farming units, exploiting a range of soil conditions though mixed farming techniques. As farming was labour-intensive, and military conscription reduced the pool of available manpower, over time the wealthy became ever more reliant upon the increasingly plentiful slave-labour provided by successful military campaigns.[236][237][238] Well managed agricultural estates helped provide for clients and dependents, support an urban family home, and fund the owner's public and military career. Large estates yielded cash for bribes, and security for borrowing. Later Roman moralists idealised farming as an intrinsically noble occupation: Cincinnatus left off his ploughing reluctantly, to serve as dictator, and returned once his state duties were done.[239][240][241] In law, land taken by conquest was ager publicus (public land). In practise, much of it was exploited by the nobility, using slaves rather than free labour. Rome's expansionist wars and colonisations were at least partly driven by the land-hunger of displaced peasants, who must otherwise join the swelling, dependent population of urban plebs.[242] At the end of the second Punic War, Rome added the fertile ager Campanus, suitable for intense cultivation of vines, olives and cereals. Like the grain-fields of Sicily – seized after the same conflict – it was likely farmed extra-legally by leading landowners, using slave-gangs. A portion of Sicily's grain harvest was sent to Rome as tribute, for redistribution by the aediles.[243][244] The urban plebs increasingly relied on firstly subsidised, then free grain.[245] Ruins of the Aqua Anio Vetus, a Roman aqueduct built in 272 BC With the introduction of aqueducts (from 312), suburban market-farms could be supplied with run-off or waste aqueduct water. Perishable commodities such as flowers (for perfumes, and festival garlands), fresh grapes, vegetables and orchard fruits, and small livestock such as pigs and chickens, could be farmed close to municipal and urban markets.[237] In the early 2nd century Cato the Elder tried to block the illicit tapping of rural aqueducts by the elite, who thus exploited the increased productivity of cheaply bought, formerly "dry" farmland; a law was duly passed, but fines for abuses, and taxes on profits, proved more realistic solutions than an outright ban. Food surpluses, no matter how obtained, kept prices low.[246][247] Faced with increasing competition from provincial and allied grain suppliers, many Roman farmers turned to more profitable crops, especially grapes for wine production. By the late Republican era, Roman wine had been transformed from an indifferent local product for local consumption, to a major domestic and export commodity.[248][249] Roman writers have little to say about large-scale stock-breeding, but make passing references to its profitability. Drummond speculates that this might reflect elite preoccupations with historical grain famines, or long-standing competition between agriculturalists and pastoralists. While agriculture was a seasonal practise, pasturage was a year-round requirement. Some of Republican Rome's early agricultural legislation sought to balance the competing public grazing rights of small farmers, the farming elite, and transhumant pastoralists, who maintained an ancient right to herd, graze and water their animals between low-lying winter pastures and upland summer pastures. From the early second century, transhumance was practised on a vast scale, as an investment opportunity.[250][251] Though meat and hides were valuable by products of stock-raising, cattle were primarily reared to pull carts and ploughs, and sheep were bred for their wool, the mainstay of the Roman clothing industry. Horses, mules and donkeys were bred as civil and military transport. Pigs bred prolifically, and could be raised at little cost by any small farmer with rights to pannage. Their central dietary role is reflected by their use as sacrificial victims in domestic cults, funerals, and cults to agricultural deities.[250] Religion[edit] Main article: Religion in ancient Rome Further information: List of ancient Roman deities and List of Roman agricultural deities The Temple of Portunus, god of grain storage, keys, livestock and ports.[252] Rome, built between 120 and 80 BC The tomb of the Flavii, a necropolis outside the Nucerian gate (Porta Nocera) of Pompeii, Italy, constructed 50–30 BC Republican Rome's religious practises harked back to Rome's quasi-mythical history.[253][254] Romulus, a son of Mars, founded Rome after Jupiter granted him favourable bird-signs regarding the site.[255] Numa Pompilius, second king of Rome, had established Rome's basic religious and political institutions after direct instructions from the gods, given through augury, dreams and oracle. Each king thereafter was credited with some form of divinely approved innovation, adaptation or reform.[256] An Imperial-era source claims that the Republic's first consul, Brutus, effectively abolished human sacrifice to the goddess Mania, instituted by the last king, Tarquinius.[257] Romans acknowledged the existence of innumerable deities who controlled the natural world and human affairs. Every individual, occupation and location had a protective tutelary deity, or sometimes several. Each was associated with a particular, highly prescriptive form of prayer and sacrifice. Piety (pietas) was the correct, dutiful and timely performance of such actions. The well-being of each Roman household was thought to depend on daily cult to its Lares and Penates (guardian deities, or spirits), ancestors, and the divine generative essence embodied within its pater familias. A family which neglected its religious responsibilities could not expect to prosper.[258] The well-being of the Roman state depended on its state deities, whose opinions and will could be discerned by priests and magistrates, trained in augury, haruspicy, oracles and the interpretation of omens. Impieties in state religion could produce expressions of divine wrath such as social unrest, wars, famines and epidemics, vitiate the political process, render elections null and void, and lead to the abandonment of planned treaties, wars and any government business. Accidental errors could be remedied by repeating the rite correctly, or by an additional sacrifice; outright sacrilege threatened the bonds between the human and divine, and carried the death penalty. As divine retribution was invoked in the lawful swearing of oaths and vows, oath-breakers forfeited their right to divine protection, and might be killed with impunity.[259] Roman religious authorities were unconcerned with personal beliefs or privately funded cults, unless they offended natural or divine laws, or undermined the mos maiorum (roughly, "the way of the ancestors"); the relationship between gods and mortals should be sober, contractual, and of mutual benefit. Undignified grovelling, excessive enthusiasm (superstitio) and secretive practises were "weak minded" and morally suspect.[260] Magical practises were officially banned, as attempts to subvert the will of the gods for personal gain, but were probably common among all classes. Private cult organisations that seemed to threaten Rome's political and priestly hierarchy were investigated by the Senate, with advice from the priestly colleges. The Republic's most notable religious suppression was that of the Bacchanalia, a widespread, unofficial, enthusiastic cult to the Greek wine-god Bacchus. The cult organisation was ferociously suppressed, and its deity was absorbed within the official cult to Rome's own wine-god, Liber.[261] The official recognition, adoption and supervision of foreign deities and practices, whether Etruscan, Sabine, Latin or colonial Greek, had been an important unitary feature in Rome's territorial expansion and dominance since the days of the kings. For example, king Servius Tullius had established an Aventine temple to Diana as a Roman focus for the Latin League.[253][254] The gods were thought to communicate their wrath (ira deorum) through prodigies (unnatural or aberrant phenomena). During the crisis of the Second Punic War an unprecedented number of reported prodigies were expiated, in more than twenty days of public ritual and sacrifices. In the same period, Rome recruited the "Trojan" Magna Mater (Great Mother of the Gods) to the Roman cause, "Hellenised" the native Roman cult to Ceres; and took control of the Bacchanalia festival in Rome and its allied territories. Following Rome's disastrous defeat at Cannae, the State's most prominent written oracle recommended the living burial of human victims in the Forum Boarium to placate the gods.[262][263] Livy describes this "bloodless" human sacrifice as an abhorrent but pious necessity; Rome's eventual victory confirmed the gods' approval.[264] Starting in the mid-Republican era, some leading Romans publicly displayed special, sometimes even intimate relationships with particular deities. For instance, Scipio Africanus claimed Jupiter as a personal mentor. Some gentes claimed a divine descent, often thanks to a false etymology of their name; the Caecilii Metelli pretended to descend from Vulcan through his son Caeculus, the Mamilii from Circe through her granddaughter Mamilia, the Julii Caesares and the Aemilii from Venus through her grandsons Iulus and Aemylos. In the 1st century, Sulla, Pompey, and Caesar made competing claims for Venus' favour.[265][266][267] Priesthoods[edit] With the abolition of monarchy, some of its sacral duties were shared by the consuls, while others passed to a Republican rex sacrorum (king of the sacred rites"), a patrician "king", elected for life, with great prestige but no executive or kingly powers.[268] Rome had no specifically priestly class or caste. As every family's pater familias was responsible for his family's cult activities, he was effectively the senior priest of his own household. Likewise, most priests of public cult were expected to marry, produce children, and support their families.[269] In the early Republic the patricians, as "fathers" to the Roman people, claimed the right of seniority to lead and control the state's relationship with the divine. Patrician families, in particular the Cornelii, Postumii and Valerii, monopolised the leading state priesthoods: the flamines of Jupiter, Mars and Quirinus, as well as the pontifices. The patrician Flamen Dialis employed the "greater auspices" (auspicia maiora) to consult with Jupiter on significant matters of State. Twelve "lesser flaminates" (Flamines minores), were open to plebeians, or reserved to them. They included a Flamen Cerealis in service of Ceres, goddess of grain and growth, and protector of plebeian laws and tribunes.[270] The plebs had their own forms of augury, which they credited to Marsyas, a satyr or silen in the entourage of Liber, plebeian god of grapes, wine, freedom and male fertility.[271] The priesthoods of local urban and rustic Compitalia street-festivals, dedicated to the Lares of local communities, were open to freedmen and slaves, to whom "even the heavy-handed Cato recommended liberality during the festival"; so that the slaves, "being softened by this instance of humanity, which has something great and solemn about it, may make themselves more agreeable to their masters and be less sensible of the severity of their condition".[272] Denarius of Lucius Caesius, 112–111 BC. On the obverse is Apollo, as written on the monogram behind his head, who also wears the attributes of Vejovis, an obscure deity. The obverse depicts a group of statues representing the Lares Praestites, which was described by Ovid.[273][274] The Lex Ogulnia (300) gave patricians and plebeians more-or-less equal representation in the augural and pontifical colleges;[275] other important priesthoods, such as the Quindecimviri ("The Fifteen"), and the epulones[276] were opened to any member of the senatorial class.[277] To restrain the accumulation and potential abuse of priestly powers, each gens was permitted one priesthood at any given time, and the religious activities of senators were monitored by the censors.[277] Magistrates who held an augurate could claim divine authority for their position and policies.[278][279] In the late Republic, augury came under the control of the pontifices, whose powers were increasingly woven into the civil and military cursus honorum. Eventually, the office of pontifex maximus became a de facto consular prerogative.[280] Some cults may have been exclusively female; for example, the rites of the Good Goddess (Bona Dea). Towards the end of the second Punic War, Rome rewarded priestesses of Demeter from Graeca Magna with Roman citizenship for training respectable, leading matrons assacerdotes of "Greek rites" to Ceres.[281] Every matron of a family (the wife of its pater familias) had a religious duty to maintain the household fire, which was considered an extension of Vesta's sacred fire, tended in perpetuity by the chaste Vestal Virgins. The Vestals also made the sacrificial mola salsa employed in many State rituals, and represent an essential link between domestic and state religion. Rome's survival was thought to depend on their sacred status and ritual purity. Vestals found guilty of inchastity were "willingly" buried alive, to expiate their offence and avoid the imposition of blood-guilt on those who inflicted the punishment.[282][283] Temples and festivals[edit] Further information: Roman temple, Roman festival, Roman calendar, and Fasti Inside the "Temple of Mercury" or Temple of Echo at Baiae, containing one of the largest domes in the world before the building of the Pantheon, Rome in the 2nd century AD Rome's major public temples were contained within the city's sacred, augural boundary (pomerium), which had supposedly been marked out by Romulus, with Jupiter's approval. The Temple of Jupiter Optimus Maximus ("Jupiter, Best and Greatest") stood on the Capitoline Hill. Among the settled areas outside the pomerium was the nearby Aventine Hill. It was traditionally associated with Romulus' unfortunate twin, Remus, and in later history with the Latins, and the Roman plebs. The Aventine seems to have functioned as a place for the introduction of "foreign" deities.[284] In 392, Camillus established a temple there to Juno Regina, Etruscan Veii's protective goddess. Later introductions include Summanus, c. 278, Vortumnus c. 264, and at some time before the end of the 3rd century, Minerva.[285] While Ceres' Aventine temple was most likely built at patrician expense, to mollify the plebs, the patricians brought the Magna Mater ("Great mother of the Gods") to Rome as their own "Trojan" ancestral goddess, and installed her on the Palatine, along with her distinctively "un-Roman" Galli priesthood.[286] Romulus was said to have pitched his augural tent atop the Palatine. Beneath its southern slopes ran the sacred way, next to the former palace of the kings (Regia), the House of the Vestals and Temple of Vesta. Close by were the Lupercal shrine and the cave where Romulus and Remus were said to have been suckled by the she-wolf. On the flat area between the Aventine and Palatine was the Circus Maximus, which hosted chariot races and religious games. Its several shrines and temples included those to Rome's indigenous sun god, Sol, the moon-goddess Luna, the grain-storage god, Consus, and the obscure goddess Murcia. A temple to Hercules stood in the Forum Boarium, near the Circus starting gate. Every district (Vicus) of the city had a crossroads shrine to its own protective Lares. Whereas Republican (and thereafter, Imperial) Romans marked the passage of years with the names of their ruling consuls, their calendars marked the anniversaries of religious foundations to particular deities, the days when official business was permitted (fas), and those when it was not (nefas). The Romans observed an eight-day week; markets were held on the ninth day. Each month was presided over by a particular, usually major deity. The oldest calendars were lunar, structured around the most significant periods in the agricultural cycle, and the religious duties required to yield a good harvest. In the military[edit] Denarius of Caesar, minted just before his murder, in 44 BC. It was the first Roman coin bearing the portrait of a living person. The lituus and culullus depicted behind his head refer to his augurate and pontificate. The reverse with Venus alludes to his claimed descent from the goddess.[287] Before any campaign or battle, Roman commanders took auspices, or haruspices, to seek the gods' opinion regarding the likely outcome. Military success was achieved through a combination of personal and collective virtus (roughly, "manly virtue") and divine will. Triumphal generals dressed as Jupiter Capitolinus, and laid their victor's laurels at his feet. Religious negligence, or lack of virtus, provoked divine wrath and led to military disaster.[288][289] Military oaths dedicated the oath-takers life to Rome's gods and people; defeated soldiers were expected to take their own lives, rather than survive as captives. Examples of devotio, as performed by the Decii Mures, in which soldiers offered and gave their lives to the Di inferi (gods of the underworld) in exchange for Roman victory were celebrated as the highest good. Some of Republican Rome's leading deities were acquired through military actions. In the earliest years of the Republic, Camillus promised Veii's goddess Juno a temple in Rome as incentive for her desertion (evocatio). He conquered the city in her name, brought her cult statue to Rome "with miraculous ease" and dedicated a temple to her on the Aventine Hill.[290] The first known temple to Venus was built to fulfil a vow made by Q. Fabius Gurges during battle against the Samnites.[291][292] Following Rome's disastrous defeat by Carthage in the Battle of Lake Trasimene (217), Rome laid siege to Eryx, a Sicillian ally of Carthage. The city's patron deity, whom the Romans recognised as a warlike version of Venus, was "persuaded" to change her allegiance and was rewarded with a magnificent temple on the Capitoline Hill, as one of Rome's twelve Dii consentes. Venus Victrix was thought to grant her favourites a relatively easy victory, worthy of an ovation and myrtle crown.[293][294] Cities, towns and villas[edit] City of Rome[edit] The ruins of the Servian Wall, built during the 4th century BC, one of the earliest ancient Roman defensive walls Life in the Roman Republic revolved around the city of Rome, and its seven hills. The most important governing, administrative and religious institutions were concentrated at its heart, on and around the Capitoline and Palatine Hills. The city rapidly outgrew its original sacred boundary (pomerium), and its first city walls. Further growth was constrained by an inadequate fresh-water supply. Rome's first aqueduct (312) built during the Punic wars crisis, provided a plentiful, clean supply. The building of further aqueducts led to the city's expansion and the establishment of public baths (thermae) as a central feature of Roman culture.[295][296] The city also had several theatres,[297] gymnasiums, and many taverns and brothels. Living space was at a premium. Some ordinary citizens and freedmen of middling income might live in modest houses but most of the population lived in apartment blocks (insulae, literally "islands"), where the better-off might rent an entire ground floor, and the poorest a single, possibly windowless room at the top, with few or no amenities. Nobles and rich patrons lived in spacious, well-appointed town houses; they were expected to keep "open house" for their peers and clients. A semi-public atrium typically functioned as a meeting-space, and a vehicle for display of wealth, artistic taste, and religious piety. Noble atria were also display areas for ancestor-masks (imagines).[298] Most Roman towns and cities had a forum and temples, as did the city of Rome itself. Aqueducts brought water to urban centres.[299] Landlords generally resided in cities and left their estates in the care of farm managers. Culture[edit] Clothing[edit] Main article: Clothing in ancient Rome The Orator, c. 100 BC, an Etrusco-Roman statue of a Republican senator, wearing toga praetexta and senatorial shoes; compared to the voluminous, costly, impractical togas of the Imperial era, the Republican-era type is frugal and "skimpy" (exigua).[300] The basic Roman garment was the Greek-style tunic, worn knee-length and short-sleeved (or sleeveless) for men and boys, and ankle-length and long-sleeved for women and girls. The toga was distinctively Roman. It was thought to have begun during the early Roman kingdom, as a plain woolen "shepherd's wrap", worn by both sexes, all classes, and all occupations, including the military.[301] By the middle to late Republic, citizen women had abandoned it for the less bulky, Greek-style stola, and the military used it only for off-duty ceremonies.[302] The toga became a mark of male citizenship, a statement of social degree.[303] Convention also dictated the type, colour and style of calcei (ankle-boots) appropriate to each level of male citizenship; red for senators, brown with crescent-shaped buckles for equites, and plain tanned for plebs. The whitest, most voluminous togas were worn by the senatorial class. High ranking magistrates, priests and citizen's children were entitled to a purple-bordered toga praetexta. Triumphal generals wore an all-purple, gold-embroidered toga picta, associated with the image of Jupiter and Rome's former kings – but only for a single day; Republican mores simultaneously fostered competitive display and attempted its containment, to preserve at least a notional equality between peers, and reduce the potential threats of class envy.[304] Togas, however, were impractical for physical activities other than sitting in the theatre, public oratory, and attending the salutiones ("greeting sessions") of rich patrons. Most Roman citizens, particularly the lower class of plebs, seem to have opted for more comfortable and practical garments, such as tunics and cloaks. Luxurious and highly coloured clothing had always been available to those who could afford it, particularly women of the leisured classes. There is material evidence for cloth-of-gold (lamé) as early as the 7th century.[305] By the 3rd century, significant quantities of raw silk was being imported from China.[306] The Lex Oppia (215), which restricted personal expenditure on such luxuries as purple clothing, was repealed in 195, after a mass public protest by wealthy Roman matrons.[307] Tyrian purple, as a quasi-sacred colour, was officially reserved for the border of the toga praetexta and for the solid purple toga picta;[308][309] but towards the end of the Republic, the notorious Verres was wearing a purple pallium at all-night parties, not long before his trial, disgrace and exile for corruption.[310] For most Romans, even the simplest, cheapest linen or woolen clothing represented a major expense. Worn clothing was passed down the social scale until it fell to rags, and these in turn were used for patchwork.[311] Wool and linen were the mainstays of Roman clothing, idealised by Roman moralists as simple and frugal.[312] Landowners were advised that female slaves not otherwise occupied should be producing homespun woolen cloth, good enough for clothing the better class of slave or supervisor. Cato the Elder recommended that slaves be given a new cloak and tunic every two years; coarse rustic homespun would likely be "too good" for the lowest class of slave, but not good enough for their masters.[313] For most women, the carding, combing, spinning and weaving of wool were part of daily housekeeping, either for family use or for sale. In traditionalist, wealthy households, the family's wool-baskets, spindles and looms were positioned in the semi-public reception area (atrium), where the mater familias and her familia could thus demonstrate their industry and frugality; a largely symbolic and moral activity for those of their class, rather than practical necessity.[314] As the Republic wore on, its trade, territories and wealth increased. Roman conservatives deplored the apparent erosion of traditional, class-based dress distinctions, and an increasing Roman appetite for luxurious fabrics and exotic "foreign" styles among all classes, including their own. Towards the end of the Republic, the ultra-traditionalist Cato the Younger publicly protested the self-indulgent greed and ambition of his peers, and the loss of Republican "manly virtues", by wearing a "skimpy" dark woolen toga, without tunic or footwear.[312][315] Food and dining[edit] Main article: Ancient Roman cuisine Banquet scene, fresco, Herculaneum, Italy, c. 50 BC Modern study of the dietary habits during the Republic are hampered by various factors. Few writings have survived, and because different components of their diet are more or less likely to be preserved, the archaeological record cannot be relied on.[316] Cato the Elder's De Agri Cultura includes several recipes and his suggested "Rations for the hands". The list of ingredients includes cheese, honey, poppy seeds, coriander, fennel, cumin, egg, olives, bay leaves, laurel twig, and anise. He gives instructions for kneading bread, making porridge, Placenta cake, brine, various wines, preserving lentils, planting asparagus, curing ham, and fattening geese and squab.[317] The Roman poet Horace mentions another Roman favorite, the olive, in reference to his own diet, which he describes as very simple: "As for me, olives, endives, and smooth mallows provide sustenance."[318] Meat, fish and produce were a part of the Roman diet at all levels of society.[319] Romans valued fresh fruit, and had a diverse variety available to them.[320] Wine was considered the basic drink,[321] consumed at all meals and occasions by all classes and was quite inexpensive. Cato once advised cutting his rations in half to conserve wine for the workforce.[322] Many types of drinks involving grapes and honey were consumed as well. Drinking on an empty stomach was regarded as boorish and a sure sign for alcoholism, the debilitating physical and psychological effects of which were known to the Romans. Accusations of alcoholism were used to discredit political rivals. Prominent Roman alcoholics included Marcus Antonius,[323] and Cicero's own son Marcus (Cicero Minor). Even Cato the Younger was known to be a heavy drinker.[324] Education and language[edit] Main articles: Roman school and Latin Rome's original native language was early Latin, the language of the Italic Latins. Most surviving Latin literature is written in Classical Latin, a highly stylised and polished literary language which developed from early and vernacular spoken Latin, from the 1st century. Most Latin speakers used Vulgar Latin, which significantly differed from Classical Latin in grammar, vocabulary, and eventually pronunciation.[citation needed] Following various military conquests in the Greek East, Romans adapted a number of Greek educational precepts to their own fledgling system.[325] Strenuous, disciplined physical training helped prepare boys of citizen class for their eventual citizenship and a military career. Girls generally received instruction[326] from their mothers in the art of spinning, weaving, and sewing. Schooling in a more formal sense was begun around 200. Education began at the age of around six, and in the next six to seven years, boys and girls were expected to learn the basics of reading, writing and counting. By the age of twelve, they would be learning Latin, Greek, grammar and literature, followed by training for public speaking. Effective oratory and good Latin were highly valued among the elite, and were essential to a career in law or politics.[327] Arts[edit] Main articles: Roman Republican art, Latin literature, and Music of ancient Rome In the 3rd century, Greek art taken as the spoils of war became popular, and many Roman homes were decorated with landscapes by Greek artists.[328] Over time, Roman architecture was modified as their urban requirements changed, and the civil engineering and building construction technology became developed and refined. The architectural style of the capital city was emulated by other urban centers under Roman control and influence.[citation needed] Literature[edit] Main articles: Classical Latin § Republican, and Latin Literature § The Age of Cicero Early Roman literature was influenced heavily by Greek authors. From the mid-Republic, Roman authors followed Greek models, to produce free-verse and verse-form plays and other in Latin; for example, Livius Andronicus wrote tragedies and comedies. The earliest Latin works to have survived intact are the comedies of Plautus, written during the mid-Republic. Works of well-known, popular playwrights were sometimes commissioned for performance at religious festivals; many of these were Satyr plays, based on Greek models and Greek myths. The poet Naevius may be said to have written the first Roman epic poem, although Ennius was the first Roman poet to write an epic in an adapted Latin hexameter. However, only fragments of Ennius' epic, the Annales, have survived, yet both Naevius and Ennius influenced later Latin epic, especially Virgil's Aeneid. Lucretius, in his On the Nature of Things explicated the tenets of Epicurean philosophy. The politician, poet and philosopher Cicero's literary output was remarkably prolific and so influential on contemporary and later literature that the period from 83BC to 43BC has been called the 'Age of Cicero'. His oratory set new standards for centuries, and continue to influence modern speakers, while his philosophical works, which were, for the most part, Cicero's Latin adaptations of Greek Platonic and Epicurean works influenced many later philosophers.[329][330] Other prominent writers of this period include the grammarian and historian of religion Varro, the politician, general and military commentator Julius Caesar, the historian Sallust and the love poet Catullus. Sports and entertainment[edit] The Amphitheatre of Pompeii, built around 70 BC and buried by the eruption of Mount Vesuvius 79 AD, once hosted spectacles with gladiators. The city of Rome had a place called the Campus Martius ("Field of Mars"), which was a sort of drill ground for Roman soldiers. Later, the Campus became Rome's track and field playground. In the campus, the youth assembled to play and exercise, which included jumping, wrestling, boxing and racing.[citation needed] Equestrian sports, throwing, and swimming were also preferred physical activities.[citation needed] In the countryside, pastimes included fishing and hunting.[citation needed] Board games played in Rome included dice (Tesserae or Tali), Roman Chess (Latrunculi), Roman Checkers (Calculi), Tic-tac-toe (Terni Lapilli), and Ludus duodecim scriptorum and Tabula, predecessors of backgammon.[331] Other activities included chariot races, and musical and theatrical performances.[citation needed] See also[edit] Democratic empire History of the Roman Empire – Occurrences and people in the Roman Empire Roman commerce Roman conceptions of citizenship – aspect of history Roman economy Footnotes[edit] ^ Throughout the Republic, the Cornelii held 75 consulships and 27 consular tribuneships, almost 10% of all the consulships of the period. ^ Several historians, notably Tim Cornell, have challenged this view, saying that in the early Republic the Fasti Consulares bear names that are distinctively plebeian. Therefore, they claim that the plebeians were only excluded from higher offices by the Decemvirate in 451 BC. More recently, Corey Brennan has dismissed this theory, arguing that the consular plebeians would not have let the Decemvirs take their power away that easily (cf. The Praetorship, pp. 24, 25). He explains the "plebeian" names in the Fasti by some patrician gentes who later died out, or lost their status. Consequently, this article follows the traditional narrative that the plebeians were excluded from the start. ^ The urban poor were registered in the four urban tribes, whilst the 31 other tribes were composed of landowners, who therefore had the majority in the Tribal Assembly. Humm thinks that Caecus actually did not appointed "freedmen" in the Senate, but chose new Roman citizens from the recently conquered cities in Italy. ^ Appius Caecus is a complex character whose reforms are difficult to interpret. For example, Mommsen considered he was a revolutionary, but was puzzled by his opposition to the Lex Ogulnia, which contradicts his previous "democratic" policies. Taylor on the contrary thought he defended patricians' interests, as freedmen remained in the clientele of their patrons. More recently, Humm described his activity as the continuation of the reforms undertaken since Stolo and Lateranus. ^ There are significant differences between the accounts of Cassius Dio, Dionysius, and Plutarch, but the latter's is traditionally followed in the academic literature. References[edit] ^ Crawford, Roman Republican Coinage, pp. 455, 456. ^ "Latin League". Encyclopaedia Britannica. ^ a b Taagepera, Rein (1979). "Size and Duration of Empires: Growth–Decline Curves, 600 BC to 600 AD". Social Science History. 3 (3/4): 115–138 [125]. doi:10.2307/1170959. JSTOR 1170959. ^ Arnaldo Momigliano, Cambridge Ancient History, vol. VII part 2, pp. 110, 111. ^ Society, National Geographic (6 July 2018). "Roman Republic". National Geographic Society. Retrieved 5 November 2020. ^ "Roman Republic | History, Government, Map, & Facts". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 5 November 2020. ^ "Roman Government". Ancient History Encyclopedia. Retrieved 5 November 2020. ^ Cornell, The beginnings of Rome, pp. 215–218: Cornell offers a summary of "Livy's prose narrative" and derived literary works relating to the expulsion of the kings. ^ Dionysius, iv. 64–85.[1] ^ Livy, i. 57–60 ^ Cornell, Beginnings of Rome, pp. 226–228. ^ Aristotle, Politics, 5.1311a. ^ Cornell, Beginnings of Rome, pp. 215–218, 377–378. ^ Drummond, Cambridge Ancient History, VII, part 2, p. 178. ^ Cornell, Beginnings of Rome, pp. 215–217. ^ Grant, The History of Rome, p. 33 ^ Florus, Epitome, i. 11–12. ^ Grant, The History of Rome, pp. 37–41. ^ Pennell, Ancient Rome, Ch. II ^ Cornell, Beginnings of Rome, pp. 289–291. ^ Cornell, Beginnings of Rome, pp. 256–259: Plebs ("the mass") was originally a disparaging term, but was adopted as a badge of pride by those whom it was meant to insult. It might not have referred to wealthier commoners. ^ Orlin, A Companion to Roman Religion, pp. 59–60. ^ The traditional date for the first secession is given by Livy as 494; many other dates have been suggested, and several such events probably took place: see Cornell, Beginnings of Rome, pp. 215–218, 256–261, 266. ^ For a discussion of the duties and legal status of plebeian tribunes and aediles, see Andrew Lintott, Violence in Republican Rome, Oxford University Press, 1999, pp. 92–101. ^ Florus, Epitome, i. 13. ^ Grant, The History of Rome, pp. 48–49. ^ Grant, The History of Rome, p. 52. ^ Grant, The History of Rome, p. 53. ^ It has nevertheless been speculated that Lucius Atilius Luscus in 444, and Quintus Antonius Meranda in 422 were also plebeian. cf. Brennan, The Praetorship, p. 50. ^ Cornell, Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 7-2, p. 338. ^ Livy, vi. 11, 13–30. ^ Cornell, Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 7-2, pp. 331, 332. ^ a b Cornell, Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 7-2, p. 337. Cornell explains that Livy confused the contents of the Lex Licinia Sextia of 366 the Lex Genucia of 342. ^ Livy mentions at least two patricians favourable to the tribunes: Marcus Fabius Ambustus, Stolo's father-in-law, and the dictator for 368 Publius Manlius Capitolinus, who appointed the first plebeian magister equitum, Gaius Licinius Calvus. ^ Livy, vi. 36–42. ^ Broughton, vol. I, pp. 108–114. ^ Brennan, The Praetorship, pp. 59–61. ^ Livy, vii. 42. ^ Brennan, The Praetorship, pp. 65–67, where he shows that the ten-year rule was only temporary at this time. ^ Cornell, Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 7-2, pp. 342, 343. ^ Brennan, The Praetorship, pp. 68, 69. ^ Cornell, Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 7-2, pp. 393, 394. Cornell gives an earlier date, before 318. ^ Humm, Appius Claudius Caecus, pp. 185–226. ^ Taylor, Voting Districts, pp. 132–138. ^ Bruce MacBain, "Appius Claudius Caecus and the Via Appia", in The Classical Quarterly, New Series, Vol. 30, No. 2 (1980), pp. 356–372. ^ Cornell, Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 7-2, p. 343. ^ Graham Maddox, "The Economic Causes of the Lex Hortensia", in Latomus, T. 42, Fasc. 2 (Apr.–Jun. 1983), pp. 277–286. ^ R. Develin, "'Provocatio" and Plebiscites'. Early Roman Legislation and the Historical Tradition", in Mnemosyne, Fourth Series, Vol. 31, Fasc. 1 (1978), pp. 45–60. ^ Cornell, Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 7-2, pp. 340, 341. ^ Cornell, The Beginnings of Rome, p. 342 ^ Franke, Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 7, part 2, p. 484. ^ Grant, The History of Rome, p. 78. ^ Dionysius of Halicarnassus, xix. 5, 6. ^ Plutarch, Pyrrhus, 14. ^ Franke, Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 7, part 2, pp. 456, 457. ^ Cicero, Cato Maior de Senectute, 6. ^ Plutarch, Pyrrhus, 18, 19. ^ Franke, Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 7, part 2, pp. 466–471. ^ Dionysius of Halicarnassus, xx. 3. ^ Plutarch, Pyrrhus, 21 § 9. ^ Cassius Dio, x. 5. ^ Franke, Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 7, part 2, pp. 473–480. ^ Dionysius of Halicarnassus, xx. 8. ^ Grant, The History of Rome, p. 80 ^ Polybius, iii. 22–26. ^ Livy, vii. 27. ^ Scullard, Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 7, part 2, pp. 517–537. ^ Which assembly was consulted has led to many discussions in the academic literature. Goldsworthy favours the Centuriate Assembly, cf. The Punic Wars, p. 69. ^ Polybius, i. 11, 12. ^ H. H. Scullard thinks that Caudex was not successful, since he did not receive a triumph and was succeeded in command by Messalla, his political enemy. Cf. Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 7, part 2, p. 545. ^ Scullard, Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 7, part 2, p. 547. ^ Goldsworthy, The Punic Wars, p. 113 ^ Goldsworthy, The Punic Wars, p. 84. ^ Scullard, Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 7, part 2, pp. 548–554. ^ Goldsworthy, The Punic Wars, p. 88. ^ Scullard, Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 7, part 2, pp. 554–557. ^ Crawford, Roman Republican Coinage, pp. 292, 293. ^ Scullard, Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 7, part 2, pp. 559–564. ^ Scullard, Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 7, part 2, pp. 565–569. ^ Hoyos, Companion to the Punic Wars, p. 217. ^ Hoyos, Companion to the Punic Wars, p. 215. ^ Carthage was an oligarchy at the time, dominated by the Barcids. The Roman historian Fabius Pictor thought that the Barcids conquered Spain without approval from the Carthaginian government; a view rejected by Polybius. cf. Hoyos, Companion to the Punic Wars, pp. 212–213. ^ Scullard, Cambridge Ancient History, pp. 28–31. ^ Hoyos, Companion to the Punic Wars, pp. 216–219. ^ Scullard, Cambridge Ancient History, pp. 33–36. ^ Scullard, Cambridge Ancient History, p. 37. These gentes had interests in Massalia and other Greek cities of the western Mediterranean. Massalia was concerned by the Carthaginian growing influence in Spain. ^ Scullard, Cambridge Ancient History, p. 39. ^ Briscoe, Cambridge Ancient History, p. 46. ^ Fronda, Companion to the Punic Wars, pp. 251, 252. ^ Briscoe, Cambridge Ancient History, p. 47. ^ Livy, xxi. 38, quoting Cincius Alimentus who reported a personal discussion with Hannibal, in which he said he lost 38,000 men by crossing the Alps. ^ Briscoe, Cambridge Ancient History, p. 48. ^ Polybius (iii. 117) gives 70,000 dead. Livy (xxii. 49) gives 47,700 dead and 19,300 prisoners. ^ Sylloge Nummorum Graecorum, Great Britain, Volume IX, British Museum, Part 2: Spain, London, 2002, n° 102. ^ Briscoe, Cambridge Ancient History, pp. 52, 53. ^ Briscoe, Cambridge Ancient History, pp. 49, 50. ^ Briscoe, Cambridge Ancient History, p. 57. ^ Briscoe, Cambridge Ancient History, p. 59. ^ Briscoe, Cambridge Ancient History, p. 55. ^ Briscoe, Cambridge Ancient History, p. 60. ^ a b Matyszak, The Enemies of Rome, p. 47 ^ Grant, The History of Rome, p. 115 ^ Eckstein, Rome Enters the Greek East, p. 42. ^ Eckstein, Arthur. "Rome Enters the Greek East". p. 43 ^ Matyszak, The Enemies of Rome, p. 49 ^ Grant, The History of Rome, p. 117 ^ Eckstein, Arthur. "Rome Enters the Greek East". p. 48 ^ Eckstein, Arthur. "Rome Enters the Greek East". p51 ^ a b c d e Grant, The History of Rome, p. 119 ^ a b c d e Eckstein, Arthur. "Rome Enters the Greek East". p. 52 ^ Naples National Archaeological Museum (Inv. No. 5634). ^ Lane Fox, The Classical World, p. 326 ^ Eckstein, Arthur. "Rome Enters the Greek East". p. 55 ^ a b Grant, The History of Rome, p. 120 ^ Goldsworthy, In the Name of Rome, p. 75 ^ Goldsworthy, In the Name of Rome, p. 92 ^ Matyszak, The Enemies of Rome, p. 53 ^ History of Rome – The republic, Isaac Asimov. ^ Pennell, Ancient Rome, Ch. XV, para. 24 ^ Goldsworthy, The Punic Wars, p. 338 ^ Goldsworthy, The Punic Wars, p. 339 ^ Abbott, 96 ^ a b Bishop, Paul. "Rome: Transition from Republic to Empire" (PDF). Hillsborough Community College. Retrieved 19 February 2014. ^ Abbott, 97 ^ Stobart, J.C. (1978). "III". In Maguinness, W.S; Scullard, H.H. The Grandeur That was Rome (4th ed.). Book Club Associates. pp. 75–82. ^ Santosuosso, Storming the Heavens, p. 29 ^ Sallust, The Jugurthine War, XII ^ Matyszak, The Enemies of Rome, p. 64 ^ Crawford, Roman Republican Coinage, pp. 449–451. ^ Abbott, 100 ^ Appian, History of Rome, §6 ^ Matyszak, The Enemies of Rome, p. 75 ^ Santosuosso, Storming the Heavens, p. 6 ^ Grant, The History of Rome, p. 161 ^ Abbott, 103 ^ Abbott, 106 ^ Abbott, 104 ^ Matyszak, The Enemies of Rome, p. 77 ^ Appian, Civil Wars, 1, 117 ^ Santosuosso, Storming the Heavens, p. 43 ^ a b c Florus, The Epitome of Roman history, Book 3, ch. 5 ^ Matyszak, The Enemies of Rome, p. 76 ^ Grant, The History of Rome, p. 158 ^ a b Lane Fox, The Classical World, p. 363 ^ a b c Plutarch, Lives, Pompey ^ Florus, The Epitome of Roman history, Book 3, ch. 6 ^ Abbott, 108 ^ Abbott, 109 ^ Abbott, 109–110 ^ Abbott, 110 ^ a b Abbott, 111 ^ a b Abbott, 112 ^ Cantor, Antiquity, p. 168 ^ Abbott, 113 ^ a b Plutarch, Lives, Caesar ^ Santosuosso, Storming the Heavens, p. 58 ^ Santosuosso, Storming the Heavens, p. 62 See also: Goldsworthy, In the Name of Rome, p. 212 ^ Abbott, 114 ^ Matyszak, The Enemies of Rome, p. 133 ^ Plutarch, Lives of the Noble Grecians and Romans, p. 266 ^ Goldsworthy, In the Name of Rome, p. 214 ^ Abbott, 115 ^ Goldsworthy, In the Name of Rome, p. 217 ^ Julius Caesar, The Civil War, 81–92 See also: Goldsworthy, In the Name of Rome, p. 218 ^ Goldsworthy, In the Name of Rome, p. 227 See also: Lane Fox, The Classical World, p. 403 ^ Holland, Rubicon, p. 312 ^ a b Abbott, 134 ^ Abbott, 135 ^ a b Abbott, 137 ^ Abbott, 138 ^ a b Cantor, Antiquity, p. 170 ^ Abbott, 133 ^ Roller, Duane W. (2010). Cleopatra: a biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0195365535, p. 175. ^ Walker, Susan. "Cleopatra in Pompeii?" in Papers of the British School at Rome, 76 (2008): 35–46 and 345–348 (pp. 35, 42–44). ^ Goldsworthy, In the Name of Rome, p. 237 ^ Luttwak, The Grand Strategy of the Roman Empire, p. 7 ^ Byrd, 161 ^ Byrd, 96 ^ Byrd, 44 ^ Bleiken, Jochen (1995). Die Verfassung der römischen Republik (6th ed.). Schöningh: UTB. ^ Lintott, 42 ^ Abbott, 251 ^ Abbott, 257 ^ Lintott, 51 ^ Taylor, 77 ^ Taylor, 7 ^ Abbott, 196 ^ Lintott, Constitution of the Roman Republic, p. 101. ^ Lintott, Constitution of the Roman Republic, p. 95. ^ Lintott, Constitution of the Roman Republic, p. 97. ^ Lintott, 113 ^ Byrd, 20 ^ Byrd, 179 ^ Byrd, 32 ^ Byrd, 26 ^ Byrd, 23 ^ Byrd, 24 ^ Goldsworthy, In the Name of Rome, p. 15 ^ Lane Fox, The Classical World, p. 312 ^ Nicholas V Sekunda, Early Roman Armies, p. 17. ^ Nicholas V Sekunda, Early Roman Armies, p. 18. ^ Livy, i. 43. ^ Roman Antiquities, 4.16–18 ^ Early Roman Armies, pp. 37–38. ^ "Rome, The Samnite Wars". History-world.org. Retrieved 3 October 2010. ^ Boak, A History of Rome to 565 A.D., p. 87 ^ PolybiusB6 ^ a b Santosuosso, Storming the Heavens, p. 18 ^ a b Webster, The Roman Imperial Army, p. 156 ^ Smith, Service in the Post-Marian Roman Army, p. 2 ^ Gabba, Republican Rome, The Army and The Allies, p. 9 ^ Santosuosso, Storming the Heavens, p. 11 ^ Webster, The Roman Imperial Army, p. 143 ^ Santosuosso, Storming the Heavens, p. 10 ^ Gabba, Republican Rome, The Army And the Allies, p. 1 ^ Santosuosso, p. 29 ^ Gabba, Republican Rome, The Army and The Allies, p. 25 ^ Luttwak, The Grand Strategy of the Roman Empire, p. 14 ^ Webster, The Roman Imperial Army, p. 116 ^ Luttwak, The Grand Strategy of the Roman Empire, p. 15 ^ Luttwak, The Grand Strategy of the Roman Empire, p. 43 ^ D.B. Saddington (2011) [2007]. "Classes: the Evolution of the Roman Imperial Fleets," in Paul Erdkamp (ed), A Companion to the Roman Army, 201–217. Malden, Oxford, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 978-1-4051-2153-8. Plate 12.2 on p. 204. ^ Coarelli, Filippo (1987), I Santuari del Lazio in età repubblicana. NIS, Rome, pp 35–84. ^ Tacitus. Annales. II.49. ^ Cornell, Beginnings of Rome, pp. 215–216. ^ Thomas A.J. McGinn, Prostitution, Sexuality and the Law in Ancient Rome (Oxford University Press, 1998), pp. 65ff. ^ Drummond, Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 7, part 2, p. 126. ^ Cornell, Beginnings of Rome, pp. 238, 379–380, citing Livy, 9. 46. 13–14 for the poorest citizens as forensis facto... humillimi (the "lowest of the low"). ^ Alföldy, Geza, The Social History of Rome, p. 17. ^ Cornell, Beginnings of Rome, pp. 288–291. ^ Flower, Cambridge Companion to the Roman Republic, pp. 173–175; Flower is describing the restrictions placed on Senatorial business activity by the plebiscitum Claudianum of 218 BC, and related legislation: it may have been intended to reduce opportunity for bribery and corruption, or to help Senators focus exclusively on their tasks in government. ^ D'Arms, J. B., "Senators' Involvement in Commerce in the Late Republic: Some Ciceronian Evidence", Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome, Vol. 36, The Seaborne Commerce of Ancient Rome: Studies in Archaeology and History (1980), pp. 77–89, University of Michigan Press for the American Academy in Rome. ^ David Johnston, Roman Law in Context (Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp. 33–34. ^ The plebeian involved in such a marriage would likely have been wealthy: see Cornell, The beginnings of Rome, p. 255. ^ Bruce W. Frier and Thomas A.J. McGinn, A Casebook on Roman Family Law (Oxford University Press, 2004), pp. 20, 53, 54. Plebeian marriage forms include coemptio (marriage "by purchase" – a form of dowry), and usus (marriage recognised through the couple's "habitual cohabitation") ^ Cornell, Beginnings of Rome, pp. 265–268, 283. ^ a b Bannon, Gardens and Neighbors, pp. 5–10. ^ Drummond, Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 7, part 2, pp. 118–122, 135, 136. ^ Livy, iii. 26–29. ^ Cornell, Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 7, part 2, pp. 412–413: Cato the Elder dwelt upon the probably mythical poverty of leading Romans such as Manius Dentatus, and the incorruptible Gaius Fabricius Luscinus. ^ Rosenstein, Nathan, "Aristocrats and Agriculture in the Middle and Late Republic", The Journal of Roman Studies, Vol. 98 (2008), pp. 1–3. ^ Cornell, Beginnings of Rome, pp. 265–268. ^ Gabba, Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 8, pp. 197–198. ^ Lintott, Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 9, p. 55: A later consular investigation into similar land-encroachments is dated to 175. ^ Cornell, Beginnings of Rome, pp. 328–329. ^ Bannon, Gardens and Neighbors, pp. 5–10; citing Hodge, Roman Aqueducts, p. 219 for Cato's diatribe against the misuse of aqueduct water by L. Furius Purpureus, consul in 196. ^ Nicolet, Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 9, p. 619. ^ Rosenstein, Nathan, "Aristocrats and Agriculture in the Middle Republic", The Journal of Roman Studies, Vol. 98 (2008), pp. 2–16. ^ Nicolet, Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 9, pp. 612–615: up to this time, the Roman elite had favoured Greek imported wine over any of Rome's homegrown versions. ^ a b Drummond, Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 7, part 2, pp. 118–122. ^ Gabba, Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 8, pp. 237–239. ^ Fowler, W. Warde (1899). Roman Festivals of the Period of the Republic. Port Washington, NY: Kennikat Press. pp. 202–204. ^ a b Rüpke, Companion to Roman Religion, p. 4. ^ a b Beard, North, Price, Religions of Rome, Vol. I, pp. 30–35. ^ Robert Schilling, "The Decline and Survival of Roman Religion", Roman and European Mythologies University of Chicago Press, 1992, p. 115 ^ King Numa Pompilius was also said to have consorted with the nymph Egeria. The myths surrounding king Servius Tullius include his divine fathering by a Lar of the royal household, or by Vulcan, god of fire; and his love-affair with the goddess Fortuna. ^ Macrobius describes the woolen figurines (maniae) hung at crossroad shrines during the popular Compitalia festival as substitutions for ancient human sacrifice once held at the same festival and suppressed by Rome's first consul, L. Junius Brutus. Whatever the truth regarding this sacrifice and its abolition, the Junii celebrated their ancestor cult during Larentalia rather than the usual Parentalia even in the 1st century BC; see Taylor, Lilly Ross, "The Mother of the Lares", in American Journal of Archaeology, Vol. 29, 3, (July–Sept. 1925), pp. 302 ff. ^ Orr, D. G., Roman domestic religion: the evidence of the household shrines, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, II, 16, 2, Berlin, 1978, 1557–1591. ^ Halm, Companion to Roman Religion, pp. 241, 242. ^ Rüpke, Companion to Roman Religion, p. 5. ^ Erich S. Gruen, Erich S., "The Bacchanalia affair", in Studies in Greek Culture and Roman Policy, University of California Press, 1996, pp. 34 ff. ^ Rosenberger, Companion to Roman Religion, pp. 295–298; the discovery of a hermaphroditic four-year-old child was expiated by the state haruspex, who set the child to drown in the sea. Its survival for four years after its birth would have been regarded as extreme dereliction of religious duty. ^ Livy, xxvii. 37, cited by Halm, Companion to Roman Religion, p. 244; see also Rosenberger, p. 297. ^ For Livy's use of prodigies and portents as markers of Roman impiety and military failure, see Feeney, Companion to Roman Religion, pp. 138, 139. For prodigies in the context of political decision-making, see Rosenberger, pp. 295–298. ^ Festus, "Caeculus", "Aemilia" and others. ^ T. P. Wiseman, "Legendary Genealogies in Late-Republican Rome", Greece & Rome, Second Series, Vol. 21, No. 2 (Oct. 1974), pp. 153–164. ^ Orlin, Companion to Roman Religion, pp. 67–69. ^ Jörg Rüpke, Religion of the Romans (Polity Press, 2007, originally published in German 2001), p. 223. ^ The Vestal Virgins were the major exception. The Galli, mendicant eunuch priets of the Magna Mater, were forbidden Roman citizenship. ^ Cornell, The beginnings of Rome, p. 264. ^ Barbette Stanley Spaeth, "The Goddess Ceres and the Death of Tiberius Gracchus", Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte, Vol. 39, No. 2 (1990), pp. 185–186. ^ Lott, John. B., The Neighborhoods of Augustan Rome, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2004, ISBN 0-521-82827-9, pp. 31, 35, citing Cato, On agriculture, 5.3., and Dionysius of Halicarnassus, 4.14.2–4 (excerpt), Trans. Cary, Loeb, Cambridge, 1939. ^ Ovid, Fasti, v, 129–145 ^ Crawford, Roman Republican Coinage, p. 312. ^ Cornell, The beginnings of Rome, p. 342 ^ Established in 196 to take over the running of a growing number of ludi and festivals from the pontifices ^ a b Lipka, M., Roman Gods: a conceptual approach, Versnel, H., S., Frankfurter, D., Hahn, J., (Editors), Religions in the Graeco-Roman world, Brill, 2009, pp. 171–172 ^ Rosenberger, Companion to Roman Religion, p. 299. ^ Auctoritas (authority) is etymologically linked to augur: See Cornell, The Beginnings of Rome, p. 341 ^ Brent, A. The imperial cult and the development of church order: Concepts and images of authority in paganism and early Christianity before the Age of Cyprian, Brill, 1999, pp. 19–20, 21–25: citing Cicero, De Natura Deorum, 2.4. ^ Spaeth, Barbette Stanley, The Roman goddess Ceres, University of Texas Press, 1996, pp. 4, 6–13. ISBN 0-292-77693-4 ^ Cunham, Cambridge Companion to the Roman Republic, p. 155. ^ Beard, Mary, "The Sexual Status of Vestal Virgins," The Journal of Roman Studies, Vol. 70, (1980), pp. 12–27; and Parker, Holt N. "Why Were the Vestals Virgins? Or the Chastity of Women and the Safety of the Roman State", American Journal of Philology, Vol. 125, No. 4. (2004), pp. 563–601. ^ Cornell, Beginnings of Rome, p. 264. ^ Orlin, Eric M., Foreign Cults in Republican Rome: Rethinking the Pomerial Rule, Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome, Vol. 47 (2002), pp. 4–5. For Camillus and Juno, see Stephen Benko, The virgin goddess: studies in the pagan and Christian roots of mariology, Brill, 2004, p. 27. ^ Roller, Lynn Emrich (1999). In Search of God the Mother: The Cult of Anatolian Cybele, Berkeley and Los Angeles, California: University of California Press, pp. 282–285. ISBN 0-520-21024-7 ^ Crawford, Roman Republican Coinage, pp. 487–495. ^ Orlin, Companion to Roman Religion, p. 58. ^ Beard, North, Price, Religions of Rome, Vol. I, pp. 44, 59, 60, 143. ^ Cornell, Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 7, part 2, p. 299, citing Livy xxi. 8–9 and xxii. 3–6. Livy describes this as evocatio (a "calling forth") initiated by Roman soldiers who snatched the goddess's sacrificial portion during her Veiian rites; the Veiian priest had announced that whoever possessed the sacred entrails would win the coming battle. ^ Eden, P. T., "Venus and the Cabbage" Hermes, 91, (1963) p. 456. ^ Schilling, R. La Religion romaine de Venus, BEFAR, Paris, 1954, p. 87, suggests that Venus began as an abstraction of personal qualities, later assuming Aphrodite's attributes. ^ See Mary Beard, The Roman Triumph, The Belknap Press, 2007, pp. 62–63. ^ Brouwer, Henrik H. J., Bona Dea, The Sources and a Description of the Cult, Études préliminaires aux religions orientales dans l'Empire romain, 110, Brill, 1989: citing Pliny the Elder, Natural History, Book 23, 152–158, and Book 15, 125. ^ Gargarin, M. and Fantham, E. (editors). The Oxford Encyclopedia of Ancient Greece and Rome, Volume 1. p. 145. ^ For the earliest likely development of Roman public bathing, see Fagan, Garrett T., Bathing in Public in the Roman World, University of Michigan Press, 1999, pp. 42–44. ^ Jones, Mark Wilson Principles of Roman Architecture. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2000. ^ "The architecture of the ancient Romans was, from first to last, an art of shaping space around ritual:" Lott, John. B., The Neighborhoods of Augustan Rome, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2004, p. 1, citing Frank E. Brown, Roman Architecture, (New York, 1961, p. 9. Some Roman ritual includes activities which might be called, in modern terms, religious; some is what might be understood in modern terms as secular – the proper and habitual way of doing things. For Romans, both activities were matters of lawful custom (mos maiorum) rather than religious as opposed to secular. ^ Kevin Greene, "Technological Innovation and Economic Progress in the Ancient World: M.I. Finley Re-Considered", The Economic History Review, New Series, Vol. 53, No. 1. (February 2000), pp. 29–59 (39) ^ Ceccarelli, L., in Bell, S., and Carpino, A., A, (Editors) A Companion to the Etruscans (Blackwell Companions to the Ancient World), Blackwell Publishing, 2016, p. 33 ^ According to Roman tradition, soldiers had once worn togas to war, hitching them up with what was known as a "Gabine cinch". See Stone, The World of Roman Costume, p. 13. ^ An equestrian statue, described during the Imperial era by Pliny the Elder as "ancient", showed the early, legendary Republican heroine Cloelia on horseback, wearing a toga: see Olson, Roman Dress and the Fabrics of Roman Culture, p. 151 (note 18). ^ Vout, Caroline, "The Myth of the Toga: Understanding the History of Roman Dress", Greece & Rome, 43, No. 2 (Oct. 1996), p. 215: Vout cites Servius, In Aenidem, 1.281 and Nonius, 14.867L for the former wearing of togas by women other than prostitutes and adulteresses. ^ Flower, Harriet F., Ancestor Masks and Aristocratic Power in Roman Culture, Oxford University Press, 1996, p. 118: "The best model for understanding Roman sumptuary legislation is that of aristocratic self-preservation within a highly competitive society which valued overt display of prestige above all else." ^ Sebesta, The World of Roman Costume, pp. 62–68. ^ Gabucci, Ada (2005). Dictionaries of Civilization: Rome. University of California Press. p. 168. ^ Astin, Rawson, Morel, Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 9, pp. 181–185, 439, 453, 495. ^ Bradley, Mark, Colour and Meaning in Ancient Rome, Cambridge Classical Studies, Cambridge University Press, 2011, pp. 189, 194–195 ^ Edmondson, Roman Dress and the Fabrics of Roman Culture, pp. 28–30; Keith, p. 200. ^ Sebesta, The World of Roman Costume, pp. 54–56. ^ Vout, Caroline, "The Myth of the Toga: Understanding the History of Roman Dress", Greece & Rome, 43, No. 2 (Oct. 1996), pp. 211, 212. ^ a b Edmondson, Roman Dress and the Fabrics of Roman Culture, p. 33. ^ Sebesta, The World of Roman Costume, p. 70, citing Columella, 12, praef. 9–10, 12.3.6. ^ In reality, she was the female equivalent of the romanticised citizen-farmer: see Flower, Cambridge Companion to the Roman Republic, pp. 153, 195–197. ^ Appian's history of Rome finds its strife-torn Late Republic tottering at the edge of chaos; most seem to dress as they like, not as they ought: "For now the Roman people are much mixed with foreigners, there is equal citizenship for freedmen, and slaves dress like their masters. With the exception of the Senators, free citizens and slaves wear the same costume." See Rothfus, MA, "The Gens Togata: Changing Styles and Changing Identities", American Journal of Philology, 2010, p. 1, citing Appian, 2.17.120 ^ Witcher, R.E. (2016) Agricultural production in Roman Italy (see page 8) from A companion to Roman Italy. (Wiley-Blackwell). Blackwell companions to the ancient world. pp. 459–482. ^ Cato, De Agri Cultura ch. 74–90, 104–125, 156–157, 158–162. ^ "Me pascunt olivae, me cichorea levesque malvae." Horace, Odes 1.31.15, c. 30 BC ^ Kron, Geoffrey (2012), Scheidel, W. (ed.), Food Production (see p. 8, fn 72) from The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Economy Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 156–174 ^ Kron, Food Production (see p. 16) ^ Phillips pp. 46–56 ^ Phillips pp. 35–45 ^ Phillipa pp. 57–63 ^ "Af first, he would drink once after supper and then leave the table; but as time went on he would allow himself to drink very generously, so that he often tarried at his wine till early morning." Plutarch, Cato the Younger, 6. ^ Nanette R. Pacal, "The Legacy of Roman Education (in the Forum)", in The Classical Journal, Vol. 79, No. 4. (April–May 1984) ^ Oxford Classical Dictionary, Edited by Simon Hornblower and Antony Spawforth, Third Edition. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 1996 ^ Joseph Farrell, Latin Language and Latin Culture (Cambridge University Press, 2001), pp. 74–75; Richard A. Bauman, Women and Politics in Ancient Rome (Routledge, 1992, 1994), pp. 51–52. ^ Toynbee, J.M.C. (December 1971). "Roman Art". The Classical Review. 21 (3): 439–442. doi:10.1017/S0009840X00221331. JSTOR 708631. ^ Zauzmer, Julie. "Donald Trump, the Cicero of 2016". The Washington Post (WP Company LLC) [US]. Retrieved 4 July 2019. ^ Griffin, Miriam (1986). "Cicero and Rome". In Boardman, John; Griffin, Jasper; Murray, Oswyn (eds.). The Oxford History of the Classical World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 454–459. ISBN 0-19-285236-1. ^ Austin, Roland G. "Roman Board Games. I", Greece & Rome 4:10, October 1934. pp. 24–34. Ancient sources[edit] Appianus Alexandrinus (Appian), Bella Mithridatica (The Mithridatic Wars), Bellum Civile (The Civil War). Aristotle, Politiká (Politics). Gaius Julius Caesar, Commentarii de Bello Civili (Commentaries on the Civil War). Marcus Tullius Cicero, Brutus, De Divinatione, De Oratore, In Verrem, Philippicae. Lucius Cassius Dio Cocceianus (Cassius Dio), Roman History. Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Romaike Archaiologia (Roman Antiquities). Titus Livius (Livy), History of Rome. Plutarchus, Lives of the Noble Greeks and Romans. Polybius, Historiae (The Histories). Publius Cornelius Tacitus, Annales, Historiae. Works cited[edit] General history of the Roman Republic (ordered chronologically)[edit] Barthold Georg Niebuhr, The History of Rome, Julius Charles Hare and Connop Thirlwall, trans., John Smith, Cambridge, 1828. Theodor Mommsen, Römische Geschichte, Leipzig, 1854–1856. Frank Frost Abbott, A History and Description of Roman Political Institutions, Elibron Classics, 1901. ISBN 0-543-92749-0 Cyril E. Robinson, A History of the Roman Republic, London, Methuen, 1932. F. W. Walbank, A. E. Astin, M. W. Frederiksen, R. M. Ogilvie (editors), The Cambridge Ancient History, vol. VII, part 2, The Rise of Rome to 220 B.C., Cambridge University Press, 1989. J. A. Crook, F. W. Walbank, M. W. Frederiksen, R. M. Ogilvie (editors), The Cambridge Ancient History, vol. VIII, Rome and the Mediterranean to 133 B.C., Cambridge University Press, 1989. A. E. Astin, Andrew Lintott, Elisabeth Rawson (editors), The Cambridge Ancient History, vol. IX, The Last Age of the Roman Republic, 146–43 B.C., Cambridge University Press, 1992. Tim Cornell, The beginnings of Rome: Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars (c. 1000 – 264 BC), Oxford, Routledge, 1995. ISBN 978-0-415-01596-7 Nathan S. Rosenstein & Robert Morstein-Marx (editors), A companion to the Roman Republic, Oxford, Blackwell, 2006. Klaus Bringmann, A History of the Roman Republic, Polity Press, Cambridge, 2007. Specific subjects[edit] Byrd, Robert (1995). The Senate of the Roman Republic. U.S. Government Printing Office Senate Document 103-23. Eck, Werner (2003). The Age of Augustus. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. ISBN 978-0-631-22957-5. Flower, Harriet I. (2009). Roman Republics. Princeton. Goldsworthy, Adrian (2003). The Complete Roman Army. Thames & Hudson. ISBN 978-0-500-05124-5. Holland, Tom (2005). Rubicon : the last years of the Roman Republic. Doubleday. ISBN 978-0-385-50313-6. Lintott, Andrew (1999). The Constitution of the Roman Republic. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-926108-6. MacDonald, W. L. (1982). The Architecture of the Roman Empire. Yale University Press, New Haven. Matyszak, Philip (2004). The Enemies of Rome. Thames & Hudson. ISBN 978-0-500-25124-9. Owen, Francis (1993). The Germanic people; their Origin Expansion & Culture. Barnes & Noble Books. ISBN 978-0-19-926108-6. Palmer, L. R. (1954). The Latin Language. Univ. Oklahoma. ISBN 978-0-8061-2136-9. Taylor, Lily Ross (1966). Roman Voting Assemblies: From the Hannibalic War to the Dictatorship of Caesar. The University of Michigan Press. ISBN 978-0-472-08125-7. Alföldy, Geza, The Social History of Rome, Routledge Revivals, 2014, (English translation of German original, 1975). Badian, E. 1968. Roman imperialism in the late Republic. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press. Bannon, Cynthia, Gardens and Neighbors: Private Water Rights in Roman Italy, University of Michigan Press, 2009. Beard, Mary, John North, & Simon Price, Religions of Rome, Volume I, illustrated, reprint, Cambridge University Press, 1998 Boardman, John; Griffin, Jasper; Murray, Oswyn (eds.), The Oxford History of the Classical World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-285236-1 Broughton, T. Robert S., The Magistrates of the Roman Republic, American Philological Association (1952–1986). Brunt, Peter A. 1988. The fall of the Roman Republic and related essays. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. Crawford, Michael 1974, Roman Republican Coinage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press. Develin, Robert. 1985. The practice of politics at Rome, 366–167 BC. Brussels: Latomus. Edmondson, J. C., and Keith, A., (Editors), Roman Dress and the Fabrics of Roman Culture, University of Toronto Press, 2008. Flower, Harriet I (editor), The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Republic, Cambridge University Press, 2004. Gruen, Erich S. 1992. Culture and national identity in Republican Rome. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press. — —. 1995. The last generation of the Roman Republic. 2d ed. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press. Harris, William V. 1979. War and imperialism in Republican Rome, 327–70 B.C. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. Dexter Hoyos (editor), A Companion to the Punic Wars, Chichester, Wiley-Blackwell, 2011. Michel Humm, Appius Claudius Caecus, La République accomplie, Rome, Publications de l'École française de Rome (2005). Raaflaub, Kurt A., ed. 2004. Social struggles in Archaic Rome: New perspectives on the conflict of the orders. 2d ed. Oxford: Blackwell. Rawson, Elizabeth. 1985. Intellectual life in the late Roman Republic. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press. Rich, John. 1993. "Fear, greed, and glory: The causes of Roman war-making in the middle Republic." In War and society in the Roman world. Edited by John Rich and Graham Shipley, 38–68. London: Routledge. Rüpke, Jörg (Editor), A Companion to Roman Religion, Wiley-Blackwell, 2007. ISBN 978-1-4051-2943-5 Salmon, Edward Togo. 1969. Roman colonization under the Republic. London: Thames and Hudson. Sebesta, Judith Lynn, & Larissa Bonfante (editors), The World of Roman Costume: Wisconsin Studies in Classics, The University of Wisconsin Press, 1994. Walbank, F. W., Polybius, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1972. Walsh, P. G., Livy: His historical aims and methods. Cambridge University Press, 1963. Vishnia, Rachel Feig, State, society, and popular leaders in mid-Republican Rome, 241–167 BC, London, Routledge, 1996. External links[edit] Wikimedia Commons has media related to Roman Republic. Library resources about Roman Republic Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries The Roman Republic from In Our Time (BBC Radio 4) Nova Roma – Educational Organization a working historical reconstruction of the Roman Republic Roman Empire History Preceded by Roman Kingdom Roman Republic 509 BC – 27 BC Succeeded by Julio-Claudian dynasty Roman Empire v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films v t e Italy articles History Chronology Prehistory Italic peoples Ancient peoples of Italy Pre-Nuragic Sardinia Nuragic peoples Etruscan civilization Nuragic civilization Phoenician/Carthaginian colonies Magna Graecia Ancient Rome Kingdom Republic Empire Western Empire Middle Ages Italy under Odoacer Ostrogoths Byzantium Lombards the Holy Roman Empire the Sardinian Judicates Arabs Normans Guelphs and Ghibellines the Italian city-states the maritime republics Renaissance Italian Wars Early Modern period Unification Revolutions of 1820 Revolutions of 1830 Revolutions of 1848 Sicilian revolution of 1848 First War of Independence Crimean War Second War of Independence Expedition of the Thousand Third War of Independence Capture of Rome Monarchy and the World Wars Kingdom of Italy Colonial Empire World War I Fascist Italy World War II Resistance and Social Republic Civil War Republic Economic Boom Years of Lead Maxi Trial Mani pulite Great Recession European migrant crisis Coronavirus pandemic By topic Citizenship Currency Economy Fashion Flags Genetic Historic states Military Music Railways Geography Geographical region Peninsula Northern Northwest Northeast Central Southern South Insular Climate Fauna Flora Mountains Prealps Alps Apennines Volcanology Volcanoes Beaches Canals Caves Earthquakes Islands Lakes National parks Rivers Valleys Politics Constitution Elections Foreign relations Judiciary Law enforcement Military Parliament Political parties President (List) Prime Minister (List) Council of Ministers Regions Provinces Metropolitan cities Cities Comune Municipalities Renamed municipalities Fused municipalities Economy Economic history Regions by GDP Automotive industry Banking Central Bank Companies Energy Government debt Science and technology Stock exchange Taxation Telecommunications Tourism Trade unions Transportation Welfare Society Corruption Crime Organized crime Demographics Education Emigration Gambling Health Immigration LGBT rights Religion Social class Terrorism Women Culture Duecento Trecento Quattrocento Cinquecento Seicento Settecento Ottocento Architecture Aristocracy Art Castles Cinema Cuisine Cultural icons Orders, decorations, and medals Design Fashion Folklore Italophilia Italophobia Inventions and discoveries Languages Italian Regional Dialects Literature Media Monuments Music Mythology National symbols Anthem Cockade Colours Emblem Flag Regions Monument Personification Tree Italians People Philosophy Public holidays Sculpture Sport Traditions World Heritage Sites  Italy portal Category Commons News Quotes Travel WikiProject v t e Ancient Greek and Roman wars Ancient Greece Trojan War First Messenian War Second Messenian War Lelantine War Greek–Punic Wars (Sicilian Wars) Greco-Persian Wars Aeginetan War Wars of the Delian League Samian War Peloponnesian War Corinthian War First / Second / Third Sacred War Social War (357–355 BC) Expansion of Macedonia Wars of Alexander the Great Wars of the Diadochi Lamian War Chremonidean War Cleomenean War Social War (220–217 BC) Cretan War Aetolian War War against Nabis Maccabean Revolt Roman Republic Roman–Latin wars (First Latin War (Battle of Lake Regillus) Second Latin War) Samnite Wars Pyrrhic War Punic Wars (First Second Third) Macedonian Wars (Illyrian First Macedonian Second Macedonian Seleucid Third Macedonian Fourth Macedonian) Jugurthine War Cimbrian War Roman Servile Wars (First Second Third) Social War (91–87 BC) Sulla's civil wars (First Second) Mithridatic Wars (First Second Third) Gallic Wars Julius Caesar's civil war Augustus' rise to power (Battle of Mutina Liberators' civil war Sicilian revolt Perusine War (Fulvia's civil war) Final War of the Roman Republic) Roman Empire Germanic wars (Marcomannic Alemannic Gothic Visigothic) Conquest of Britain Wars of Boudica Armenian War Four Emperors Jewish wars Domitian's Dacian War Trajan's Dacian Wars Parthian Wars Wars against Persia Third-century civil wars Decline and fall of the Western Empire Military history v t e History of Europe Prehistory Paleolithic Europe Neolithic Europe Bronze Age Europe Iron Age Europe Classical antiquity Classical Greece Roman Republic Hellenistic period Roman Empire Early Christianity Christianity in late antiquity Crisis of the Third Century Fall of the Western Roman Empire Late antiquity Middle Ages Early Middle Ages Migration Period Christianity in the Middle Ages Christianization Francia Byzantine Empire Papal States Bulgarian Empire First Second Maritime republics Venice Genoa Pisa Amalfi Viking Age Kievan Rus' Crown of Aragon Holy Roman Empire High Middle Ages Republic of Florence Feudalism Crusades Mongol invasion Serbian Empire Late Middle Ages Black Death Hundred Years' War Kalmar Union Early modern Renaissance Christianity in the modern era Reformation Age of Discovery Baroque Grand Duchy of Tuscany Thirty Years' War Absolute monarchy Ottoman Empire Portuguese Empire Spanish Empire Early modern France Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth Cossack Hetmanate Swedish Empire Dutch Republic British Empire Habsburg Monarchy Russian Empire Age of Enlightenment Modern Great Divergence Industrial Revolution French Revolution Napoleonic Wars Nationalism Revolutions of 1848 World War I Russian Revolution Interwar period World War II Cold War European integration COVID-19 pandemic See also Art of Europe Genetic history of Europe History of Christianity History of the Mediterranean region History of the European Union History of Western civilization Maritime history of Europe Military history of Europe Authority control LCCN: sh85115114 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Roman_Republic&oldid=996653380" Categories: Roman Republic Ancient Italian history Former countries on the Italian Peninsula Countries in ancient Africa States and territories established in the 6th century BC 509 BC 6th-century BC establishments in Italy States and territories disestablished in the 1st century BC 1st-century BC disestablishments 27 BC 1st millennium BC in Italy Former republics Hidden categories: Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata Use dmy dates from October 2019 Articles containing Latin-language text Pages using infobox country or infobox former country with the symbol caption or type parameters Wikipedia articles needing clarification from January 2019 Pages using multiple image with auto scaled images All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from November 2018 Articles with unsourced statements from June 2018 Articles with unsourced statements from May 2015 Commons category link is on Wikidata Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Languages Afrikaans Ænglisc العربية Aragonés Asturianu Azərbaycanca تۆرکجه বাংলা Bân-lâm-gú Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ भोजपुरी Български Boarisch Bosanski Brezhoneg Català Cebuano Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français Frysk Galego 贛語 한국어 Հայերեն हिन्दी Hrvatski Ido Bahasa Indonesia Interlingua Ирон Íslenska Italiano עברית ქართული Kiswahili Коми Kotava Ladino Latina Latviešu Lietuvių Lingua Franca Nova Magyar Македонски മലയാളം मराठी مصرى Bahasa Melayu Mìng-dĕ̤ng-ngṳ̄ Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Norsk nynorsk Occitan Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча ਪੰਜਾਬੀ پنجابی پښتو Patois Piemontèis Plattdüütsch Polski Português Română Русиньскый Русский Scots Seeltersk Shqip Sicilianu සිංහල Simple English Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska Tagalog தமிழ் Татарча/tatarça ไทย Türkçe Українська اردو Tiếng Việt Winaray 吴语 Yorùbá 粵語 Zazaki 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 27 December 2020, at 22:21 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2912 ---- List of Roman praetors - Wikipedia List of Roman praetors From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search This list is incomplete; you can help by adding missing items with reliable sources. The following is a list of Roman praetors as reported by ancient sources. A praetor in ancient Rome was a person who held an annual office below the level of a consul but who still received a grant of imperium, allowing him to command armed forces. Two praetors each year had specific duties in Rome: the praetor urbanus (who presided in civil cases between citizens) and the praetor peregrinus (who administered justice among foreigners). Unless otherwise noted all dates are reported in BC. Contents 1 List of Praetors of the Roman Republic 1.1 4th Century BC 1.2 3rd Century BC 1.3 2nd Century BC 1.4 1st Century BC 2 References 3 Bibliography 4 External links List of Praetors of the Roman Republic[edit] The following individuals held the position of Praetor during the Roman Republic, starting with the creation of the office in 366 BC. 4th Century BC[edit] Date (BC) Name 366 Spurius Furius (M. f. L. n.) Camillus[1] 350 Publius Valerius (P. f. L. n.) Poplicola[2] 349 Lucius Pinarius (Natta?)[3][4] 347? Marcus Valerius M. f. M. n. Maximus Corvus[5] 341 Titus(?) Aemilius Mamercinus[6][7] 340 Lucius Papirius L. f. L. n. Crassus[8] 336 Quintus Publilius Philo[9] 332 Lucius Papirius (L. f. L. n. Crassus?)[10][11] 322 Lucius Plautius L. f. L. n. Venno[12] 318 Lucius Furius[13] 308 Marcus Valerius M. f. M. n. Maximus Corvus[14][15] 3rd Century BC[edit] Date (BC) Name 297? Appius Claudius (C. f. Ap. n. Caecus)[16] 296 Publius Sempronius (Sophus)[17][18] 295 Appius Claudius (C. f. Ap. n. Caecus)[19] 293 Marcus Atilius (M. f. M. n. Regulus)[20] 292 Lucius Papirius L. f. Sp. n. Cursor[21] 283 Lucius Caecilius (Metellus Denter)[22][23] 280? Quintus Marcius Philippus[24] 257 Aulus Atilius A. f. C. n. Caiatinus[25] 253 Lucius Postumius Megellus[26] 242 Quintus Valerius Falto[27] 234 Publius Cornelius[28][29] 233? Lucius Postumius A. f. A. n. Albinus[30][31] 227 Gaius Flaminius[32] 227 Marcus Valerius (Laevinus?)[32] 224? Marcus Claudius Marcellus[30] 224? Publius Furius Philus[30] 219? Lucius Furius Bibaculus[33][34] 218 Marcus Aemilius Lepidus[35] 218 Gaius Atilius Serranus[36] 218? Lucius Manlius Vulso[37] 218 Gaius Terentius Varro[38] 217 Marcus Aemilius (Regulus?)[39] 217 Aulus Cornelius Mammula[38] 217 Titus Otacilius Crassus[38] 217 Marcus Pomponius (Matho?)[40][41] 216 Marcus Claudius Marcellus[30] 216 Publius Furius Philus[30] 216 Marcus Pomponius Matho[30] 216 Lucius Postumius Albinus[30] 216? Marcus Aemilius Lepidus[42][43] 215 Appius Claudius Pulcher[44] 215 Quintus Fulvius Flaccus[44] 215 Quintus Mucius Scaevola[44] 215 Marcus Valerius Laevinus[44] 214 Publius Cornelius Lentulus[45] 214 Quintus Fabius Maximus[45] 214 Quintus Fulvius Flaccus[45] 214 Titus Otacilius Crassus[45] 213 Marcus Aemilius (Lepidus?)[46][47] 213 Marcus Atilius (Regulus?)[46][47] 213 Gnaeus Fulvius Centumalus[46] 213 Publius Sempronius Tuditanus[46] 212 Gaius Claudius Nero[48] 212 Publius Cornelius Sulla[48] 212 Gnaeus Fulvius Flaccus[48] 212 Marcus Iunius Silanus[48] 211 Gaius Calpurnius Piso[49] 211 Marcus Cornelius Cethegus[49] 211 Lucius Cornelius (Lentulus)[49] 211 Gaius Sulpicius[49] 210 Lucius Cincius Alimentus[50] 210 Gaius Laetorius[50] 210 Lucius Manlius Acidinus[50] 210 Publius Manlius Vulso[50] 209 Gaius Aurunculeius[51] 209 Gaius Hostilius Tubulus[51] 209 Titus Quinctius Crispinus[51] 209 Lucius Veturius Philo[51] 208 Quintus Claudius (Flamen?)[52][53] 208 Sextus Iulius Caesar[52] 208 Publius Licinius Crassus Dives[52] 208 Publius Licinius Varus[52] 207 Aulus Hostilius Cato[54] 207 Gaius Hostilius Cato[54] 207 Gaius Mamilius Vitulus[54] 207 Lucius Porcius Licinus[54] 206 Marcus Caecilius Metellus[55] 206 Tiberius Claudius Asellus[55] 206 Quintus Mamilius Turrinus[55] 206 Gaius Servilius (Geminus)[55] 205 Lucius Aemilius Papus[56] 205 Spurius Lucretius[56] 205 Gnaeus Octavius[56] 205 Gnaeus Servilius Caepio[56] 204 Tiberius Claudius Nero[57] 204 Marcus Marcius Ralla[57][58] 204 Marcus Pomponius Matho[57] 204 Lucius Scribonius Libo[57] 203 Publius Aelius Paetus[59] 203 Publius Cornelius Lentulus (Caudinus)[59] 203 Publius Quinctilius Varus[59] 203 Publius Villius Tappulus[59] 202 Gaius Aurelius Cotta[60] 202 Gaius Livius Salinator[60] 202 Marcus Sextius Sabinus[60] 202 Gnaeus Tremellius Flaccus[60] 201 Publius Aelius Tubero[61] 201 Marcus Fabius Buteo[61] 201 Marcus Junius Pennus[61] 201 Marcus Valerius Falto[61] 2nd Century BC[edit] Date (BC) Names 200[62] Quintus Fulvius Gillo Lucius Furius Purpurio Quintus Minucius Rufus Gaius Sergius Plautus[63] 199[64] Gnaeus Baebius Tamphilus Lucius Quinctius Flamininus Lucius Valerius Flaccus Lucius Villius Tappulus 198[65] Marcus Claudius Marcellus Lucius Cornelius Merula Gaius Helvius Marcus Porcius Cato 197[66] Lucius Atilius Marcus Helvius Lucius Manlius Vulso Marcus Minucius Rufus Gaius Sempronius Tuditanus Marcus Sergius Silus 196[67] Manius Acilius Glabrio Lucius Apustius Fullo Quintus Fabius Buteo Gaius Laelius Quintus Minucius Thermus Tiberius Sempronius Longus 195[68] Gaius Atinius Labeo Appius Claudius Nero Gaius Fabricius Luscinus Gnaeus Manlius Vulso Publius Manlius (Vulso?) Publius Porcius Laeca 194[69] Gnaeus Cornelius Blasio Gnaeus Cornelius Merenda Publius Cornelius Scipio Nasica Sextus Digitius Gnaeus Domitius Ahenobarbus Titus Iuventius Thalna 193[70] Lucius Cornelius Scipio (Asiaticus) Gaius Flaminius Marcus Fulvius Nobilior Lucius Porcius Licinus Gaius Scribonius (Curio) Lucius Valerius Messalla 192[71] Aulus Atilius Serranus Marcus Baebius Tamphilus Marcus Fulvius Centumalus< Quintus Salonius Sarra Lucius Scribonius Libo Lucius Valerius Tappo 191[72] Marcus Aemilius Lepidus Lucius Aemilius Paullus (Macedonicus) Aulus Cornelius Mammula Marcus Iunius Brutus Gaius Livius Salinator Lucius Oppius Salinator 190[73] Lucius Aemilius Regulus Gaius Atinius Labeo Lucius Aurunculeius Gnaeus Fulvius Publius Iunius Brutus Marcus Tuccius 189[74] Lucius Baebius Dives Quintus Fabius Labeo Quintus Fabius Pictor Lucius Plautius Hypsaeus Spurius Postumius Albinus Marcus Sempronius Tuditanus ? Aulus Manlius Vulso (suff.)[75] 188[76] Gaius Atinius Marcus Claudius Marcellus Appius Claudius Pulcher[77] Lucius Manlius Acidinus Fulvianus Quintus Marcius Philippus Gaius Stertinius 187[78] Publius Claudius Pulcher Quintus Fulvius Flaccus Marcus Furius Crassipes Servius Sulpicius Galba Quintus Terentius Culleo Lucius Terentius Massaliota 186[79] Gaius Aurelius Scaurus Gaius Calpurnius Piso Publius Cornelius Sulla Marcus Licinius Lucullus Titus Maenius Lucius Quinctius Crispinus 185[80] Gaius Afranius Stellio Gaius Atilius Serranus Marcus Claudius Marcellus Publius Cornelius Cethegus Aulus Postumius Albinus Luscus Lucius Postumius Tempsanus 184[81] Publius Cornelius Cethegus Gaius Decimius Flavus Quintus Naevius Matho Gaius Sempronius Blaesus Publius Sempronius Longus Aulus Terentius Varro 183[82] Publius Cornelius Sisenna Lucius Julius (Caesar?) Spurius Postumius Albinus Lucius Pupius Gnaeus Sicinius Gaius Valerius Flaccus 182[83] Lucius Caecilius Denter Quintus Fulvius Flaccus Publius Manlius (Vulso?)[84][85] Marcus Ogulnius Gallus Gaius Terentius Istra Marcus Valerius Laevinus 181[86] Tiberius Claudius Nero Lucius Duronius Quintus Fabius Buteo Quintus Fabius Maximus Quintus Petilius Spurinus Marcus Pinarius Rusca[87] 180[88] Publius Cornelius Mammula Aulus Hostilius Mancinus Gaius Maenius Tiberius Minucius Molliculus Lucius Postumius Albinus Tiberius Sempronius Gracchus Gaius Claudius Pulcher 179[89] Gnaeus Cornelius Scipio Hispallus Publius Mucius Scaevola Quintus Mucius Scaevola Gaius Valerius Laevinus 178[90] Titus Aebutius Parrus Tiberius Claudius Nero Titus Fonteius Capito Marcus Titinius Curvus Marcus Titinius ?Gaius Cluvius Saxula[91] 177[92] Publius Aelius Tubero Lucius Mummius Gaius Numisius Gaius Quinctius Flamininus Gnaeus Cornelius Scipio Gaius Valerius Laevinus 176[93] Marcus Aburius Lucius Aquillius Gallus Marcus Cornelius Scipio Maluginensis Publius Licinius Crassus Lucius Papirius Maso Marcus Popilius Laenas 175[94] Publius Aelius Ligus Appius Claudius Centho Gaius Popilius Laenas ? Quintus Baebius Sulca ? Servius Cornelius Sulla ? Gnaeus Lutatius Cerco 174[95] Marcus Atilius Serranus Gaius Cassius Longinus Lucius Claudius Lucius Cornelius Scipio Publius Furius Philus Gnaeus Servilius Caepio 173[96] Aulus Atilius Serranus Gaius Cicereius Gaius Cluvius Saxula Numerius Fabius Buteo Marcus Furius Crassipes Marcus Matienus 172[97] Spurius Cluvius Marcus Iunius Pennus Gaius Licinius Crassus Spurius Lucretius Gaius Memmius Gnaeus Sicinius 171[98] Gaius Caninius Rebilus Lucius Canuleius Dives Lucius Furius Philus Gaius Lucretius Gallus Gaius Sulpicius Galba Lucius Villius Annalis 170[99] Quintus Aelius Paetus ? Gnaeus Domitius Ahenobarbus Lucius Hortensius Quintus Maenius ? Titus Manlius Torquatus Marcus Raecius ? Gaius Tremellius 169[100] Marcus Claudius Marcellus Servius Cornelius Lentulus Gaius Decimius Publius Fonteius Capito Gaius Marcius Figulus Gaius Sulpicius Gallus 168[101] Marcus Aebutius Helva Lucius Anicius Gallus Gnaeus Baebius Tamphilus Publius Fonteius Balbus Gnaeus Octavius Gaius Papirius Carbo 167[102] Quintus Cassius Longinus Tiberius Claudius Nero Gnaeus Fulvius Manius Iuventius Thalna Gaius Licinius Nerva Aulus Manlius Torquatus 166[103] Lucius Appuleius Saturninus Marcus Fonteius Lucius Julius Caesar Aulus Licinius Nerva Publius Quinctilius Varus Publius Rutilius Calvus 165[104] Publius Cornelius Blasio? Publius Cornelius Lentulus Publius Cornelius Scipio Nasica Corculum 164[105] Quintus Minucius? Marcus Valerius Messalla? Gaius Fannius Strabo? 163[106] Marcus Cornelius Cathegus? 162[107] Gnaeus Cornelius Dolabella? Marcus Fulvius Nobilior? 161[108] Marcus Aemilius Lepidus? Marcus Pomponius 160[109] Lucius Aurelus Orestes? Sextus Iulius Caesar? 159[110] Lucius Cornelius Cn. f. L. n. Lentulus Lupus Gnaeus Tremellius[111] 157[112] Manius Acilius Glabrio? Quintus Opimius? Lucius Postumius Albinus? 156[113] Titus Annius Luscus? Quintus Fulvius Nobilior? 155[114] Manius Manilius? Aulus Postumius Albinus Lucius Valerius Flaccus? 154[115] Lucius Calpurnius Piso Caesoninus Lucius Licinius Lucullus 153[116] Manius Acilius Balbus? Titus Quinctius Flamininus? Lucius Mummius 152[117] Marcus Atilius Serranus Lucius Marcius Censorinus? 151[118] Spurius Postumius Albinus Magnus? Servius Sulpicius Galba 150[119] Gaius Livius M. Aemiliani f. M. n. Drusus? 149[120] Quintus Fabius Maximus Aemilianus[121] Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus? Publius Iuventius Thalna Lucius Hostilius Mancinus? 148[122] Quintus Caecilius Metellus Macedonicus[123] 147[124] Lucius Aurelius Cotta? Lucius Licinius Murena? Gaius Sempronius Tuditanus? Gaius Vetilius 146[125] Appius Claudius Pulcher? ? Claudius Unimanus ? Oppius? Gaius Plautius Hypsaeus 145[126] Lucius Caecilius Metellus Calvus? Quintus Fabius Maximus Servilianus? Gaius Laelius Sapiens Gaius Nigidius? 144[127] Quintus Marcius Rex Quintus Pompeius? Gnaeus Servilius Caepio? 143[128] Marcus Aemilius Lepidus Porcina? Aulus Licinius Nerva ? Quinctius ?[129] Quintus Servilius Cn. f. Cn. n. Caepio? 142[130] Gnaeus Calpurnius Piso? Lucius Hostilius Tubulus Marcus Popillius Laenas? 141[131] Publius Cornelius Scipio Nasica Serapio? Decimus Iunius Brutus Callaicus? Decimus Iunius Silanus Manlianus? 140[132] Lucius Cornelius Lentulus? Gaius Hostilius Mancinus? Marcus Iunius Brutus? 139[133] Sextus Atilius Serranus? Gnaeus Cornelius Scipio Hispanus Lucius Furius Philus? Lucius Plautius Hypsaeus? 138[134] Quintus Calpurnius Piso? Lucius Calpurnius Piso Frugi? Servius Fulvius Flaccus? 137[135] Marcus Claudius Marcellus ? Cornelius Lentulus? Gaius Fulvius Flaccus? 136[136] Manlius Publius Mucius Scaevola Lucius Tremellius Scrofa? 135[137] Marcus Cosconius Publius Popillius Laenas? Publius Rupilius? 134[138] Publius Licinius Dives Crassus Mucianus? Lucius Valerius Flaccus? 133[139] Appius Claudius? Marcus Perperna? Lucius Rupilius? Gaius Popillius C. f. 132[140] Gaius Sempronius Tuditanus Manius Aquillius? 131[141] Titus Annius Rufus? Gnaeus Octavius? 130[142] Lucius Cassius Longinus Ravilla? Lucius Cornelius Cinna? Gaius Marcius Figulus? 129[143] Marcus Aemilius Lepidus? Lucius Aurelius Orestes? Tiberius (Latinius?) Pandusa?[144] 128[145] Publius Cornelius P. f. Lentulus? Marcus Fulvius Flaccus? Marcus Plautius Hypsaeus? 127[146] Gaius Cassius Longinus? Gaius Sextius Calvinus? 126[147] Quintus Caecilius Metellus Balearicus? Titus Quinctius Flamininus? Gaius Fannius M. f.? Marcus Licinius Crassus Agelastus? 125[148] Gnaeus Domitius Ahenobarbus? Lucius Opimius Aebutius? 124[149] Quintus Fabius Maximus Allobrogicus? 123[150] Sextus Iulius Caesar Publius Manilius? Gaius Papirius Carbo? 122[151] Lucius Aurelius Cotta? Lucius Caecilius Metellus Dalmaticus? 121[152] Quintus Marcius Rex? Marcus Porcius Cato? Gaius Scribonius Curio 120[153] Lucius Caecilius Metellus Diadematus? Quintus Mucius Scaevola Augur? 119[154] Marcus Aemilius Scaurus? Gnaeus Cornelius Sisenna? Quintus Fabius Maximus Eburnus Gaius Licinius Geta? Sextus Pompeius? 118[155] Marcus Caecilius Metellus? Publius Rutilius Rufus? 117[156] Marcus Acilius Balbus? Gaius Caecilius Metellus Caprarius? Gaius Porcius Cato? 116[157] Gnaeus Papirius Carbo? 115[158] Lucius Calpurnius Piso Caesoninus? Publius Decius Marcus Livius Drusus? Gaius Marius? 114[159] Lucius Calpurnius Bestia? Publius Cornelius Scipio Nasica? Marcus Papirius Carbo? 113[160] Marcus Iunius Silanus? Lucius Memmius? Marcus Minucius Rufus? Spurius Postumius Albinus? 112[161] Quintus Caecilius Metellus Numidicus? Lucius Calpurnius Piso Frugi? Marcius Iunius Silanus? 111[162] Marcus Aemilius Scaurus? Lucius Cassius Longinus Lucius (or Quintus) Hortensius? Servius Sulpicius Galba? 109[163] Gaius Atilius Serranus? Quintus Lutatius Catulus? Quintus Servilius Caepio Gnaeus Cornelius Scipio? 108[164] Gnaeus Mallius Maximus 107[165] Gnaeus Aufidius? Gaius Billienus? Gaius Flavius Fimbria? 106[166] Lucius Aurelius Orestes? 105[167] Titus Albucius? Lucius (Annius?) Bellienus Lucius ...onius[168] 104[169] Manius Aquillius? Titus Flaminius? Lucius Licinius Lucullus Publius Licinius Nerva? Gaius Memmius? 103[170] Glaucia? Lucius Valerius Flaccus? Vibius? 102[171] Marcus Antonius Marcus Marius? Aulus Postumius Albinus? Gaius Servilius[172][173] 101[174] Quintus Caecilius Metellus Nepos? Titus Didius? Lucius Licinius L. f. Murena? 1st Century BC[edit] Date (BC) Names 100[175] Lucius Cornelius P. f. L. n. Dolabella? Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus? Publius Licinius Crassus? Gaius Servilius Glaucia Tremellius? 99[176] Gaius Cassius Longinus? Gaius Coelius Caldus? Gnaeus Domitius Ahenobarbus? 98[177] Lucius Licinius Crassus? Quintus Mucius Scaevola? 97[178] Lucius Domitius Ahenobarbus? Marcus Herennius? 96[179] Lucius Marcius Philippus? Lucius (Sempronius) Asellio? Gaius Valerius Flaccus? 95[180] Lucius Aurelius Cotta? Gaius Claudius Pulcher Lucius Julius Caesar Marcus Perperna? 94[181] Lucius Gellius Poplicola Sextus Julius Caesar? Gaius Sentius 93[182] Publius Cornelius Scipio Nasica? Lucius Cornelius Sulla (Felix) Publius Rutilius Lupus? Lucius Valerius Flaccus? 92[183] Gaius Julius Caesar? Gnaeus Pompeius Strabo? Lucius Porcius Cato? Marcus Porcius Cato? Gaius Sextius Calvinus? 91[184] Lucius Lucilius L. f.? Gnaeus Octavius (Ruso?)? Gaius Perperna? Quintus Pompeius Rufus Quintus Servilius Quintus Servilius Caepio? Servius Sulpicius Galba? 90[185] Gaius Caelius? M. (Caecilius) Cornutus? Gaius Cassius? Lucius Cornelius Cinna? Lucius Cornelius Merula? Gnaeus Octavius? Lucius Postumius Publius Servilius Vatia (Isauricus)? 89[186] Quintus Caecilius Metellus Pius Appius Claudius Pulcher Gaius Cosconius? Publius Gabinius Quintus Oppius? (Gnaeus Papirius?) Carbo? Aulus Sempronius Asellio Publius Sextilius? 88[187] Quintus Ancharius? Marcus Iunius Brutus Lucius Licinius Murena? Gaius Norbanus? ?Servilius? Publius Sextilius?[188] 86[189] Lucius Cornelius Scipio Asiagenus (Asiaticus)? 85[190] Marcus Marius Gratidianus? 84[191] Marcus Marius Gratidianus? Gaius Fabius Hadrianus 83[192] Publius? Burrienus Gaius Papirius Carbo (Arvina)? Quintus Sertorius 82[193] Lucius Iunius Brutus Damasippus Quintus Antonius Balbus Gaius Carrinus ? Magius Marcus Perperna (Vento) 81[194] Gnaeus Cornelius Dolabella Mamercus Aemilius Lepidus Livianus ? Marcus Aemelius Lepidus ? Gaius Claudius P. f. Nero ? Lucius Fufidius ? Quintus Lutatius Catulus ? Marcus Minucius Thermus Sextus Nonius Sufenas Gaius Papirius Carbo ? 80[195] Gaius Claudius Marcellus Marcus Domitius Calvinus Marcus Fannius Decimus Iunius Brutus ? Gaius Scribonius Curio ? 32[196] Marcus Valerius Messalla Potitus?[197] References[edit] ^ Livy, 7.1 ^ Livy, 7.23 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 129 ^ Livy, 7.25 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 130 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 135 ^ Livy, 8.2 ^ Livy, 8.12 ^ Livy, 8.15 ^ Livy, 8.17 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 142 ^ Livy, 8.40 ^ Livy, 9.20 ^ Livy, 9.41 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 164 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 175 ^ Livy, 10.21 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 176 ^ Livy, 10.22 ^ Livy, 10.45 ^ Livy, 10.47 ^ Livy, Periochae 12 ^ Polybius, 2.19.8 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 191 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 208 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 211 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 218 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 224 ^ Zonaras, 8.18 ^ a b c d e f g Livy, 22.35 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 225 ^ a b Broughton, 1. p. 229 ^ Valerius Maximus, 1.1.9 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 237 ^ Livy, 21.49 ^ Livy, 21.62 ^ Livy, 21.62 ^ a b c Livy, 22.25 ^ Livy, 22.9 ^ Livy, 22.7 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 246n. ^ Livy, 23.20 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 249 ^ a b c d Livy, 23.24 ^ a b c d Livy, 24.9 ^ a b c d Livy, 24.43 ^ a b Broughton, 1. p. 263 ^ a b c d Livy, 25.2 ^ a b c d Livy, 25.41 ^ a b c d Livy, 26.23 ^ a b c d Livy, 27.6 ^ a b c d Livy, 27.21 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 294 ^ a b c d Livy, 27.35 ^ a b c d Livy, 28.10 ^ a b c d Livy, 28.38 ^ a b c d Livy, 29.11 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 310 ^ a b c d Livy, 29.38 ^ a b c d Livy, 30.26 ^ a b c d Livy, 30.40 ^ Livy, 31.4 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 123 ^ Livy, 31.49 ^ Livy, 32.7 ^ Livy, 32.27 ^ Livy, 33.24 ^ Livy, 33.42 ^ Livy, 34.42 ^ Livy, 34.54 ^ Livy, 35.10 ^ Livy, 35.24 ^ Livy, 36.45 ^ Livy, 37.47 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 361 ^ Livy, 38.35 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 365 ^ Livy, 38.42 ^ Livy, 39.6 ^ Livy, 39.23 ^ Livy, 39.32 ^ Livy, 39.45 ^ Livy, 39.51 ^ Livy, 40.1 and 40.16 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 382 ^ Livy, 40.18 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 387 ^ Livy, 40.35 ^ Livy, 40.44 ^ Livy, 41.6 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 395 ^ Livy, 41.8 ^ Livy, 41.14 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 402 ^ Livy, 41.21 ^ Livy, 41.28 ^ Livy, 42.9 ^ Livy, 42.28 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 420 ^ Livy, 43.11 ^ Livy, 44.17 ^ Livy, 45.16 ^ Livy, 45.44 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 438 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 439 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 440 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 442 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 443 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 445 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 446 ^ Livy, Periochae 47 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 447 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 447 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 448 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 450 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 452 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 453 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 455 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 456 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 458 ^ Polybius 36.5.8-9 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 461 ^ Polybius 36.10.1-7 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 463 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 466 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 469 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 471 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 472 ^ Appian, Ib. 66 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 475 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 477 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 479 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 481 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 483 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 485 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 486 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 489 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 490 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 492 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 498 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 500 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 502 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 504 ^ Appian, Illyr. 10 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 506 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 507 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 508 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 510 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 512 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 513 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 516 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 521 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 523 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 526 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 527 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 529 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 530 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 532 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 534 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 535 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 538 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 540 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 545 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 549 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 551 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 553 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 556 ^ IG 12.3.173--IGRP 4.1028 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 559 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 563 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 568 ^ Cic. Verr. 2.4.147 ^ Diod. 36.9 ^ Broughton, 1. p. 571 ^ Broughton, vol. I, p. 574. ^ Broughton, vol. II, p. 1. ^ Broughton, vol. II, p. 4. ^ Broughton, vol. II, p. 7. ^ Broughton, vol. II, p. 9. ^ Broughton, vol. II, p. 11. ^ Broughton, vol. II, p. 12. ^ Broughton, vol. II, p. 14. ^ Broughton, vol. II, p. 17. ^ Broughton, vol. II, p. 20. ^ Broughton, vol. II, p. 25. ^ Broughton, vol. II, p. 33. ^ Broughton, vol. II, p. 40. ^ Plutarch, Marius 40.3-4 ^ Broughton, vol. II, p. 54. ^ Broughton, vol. II, p. 57. ^ Broughton, vol. II, p. 60. ^ Broughton, vol. II, p. 62. ^ Broughton, vol. II, p. 65. ^ Broughton, vol. II, p. 76. ^ Broughton, vol. II, p. 79. ^ Broughton, vol. II, p. 418. ^ CIL VI, 37075 Bibliography[edit] Broughton, T. Robert S., The Magistrates of the Roman Republic, American Philological Association (1952–1986), Volumes 1, 2, and Supplemental. Titus Livius Patavinus (Livy), Ab Urbe Condita (History of Rome). Polybius, Ἱστορίαι (The Histories). Valerius Maximus, Factorum ac dictorum memorabilium libri IX ("Nine books of memorable deeds and sayings". Zonaras, Ἐπιτομὴ Ἱστοριῶν (Extracts of History). External links[edit] v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Roman_praetors&oldid=996812859" Categories: Ancient Roman titles Lists of office-holders in ancient Rome Hidden categories: Incomplete lists from May 2020 Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Español Italiano Edit links This page was last edited on 28 December 2020, at 19:03 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2927 ---- Founding of Rome - Wikipedia Founding of Rome From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Mythical tale Capitoline Wolf, sculpture of the she-wolf feeding the twins Romulus and Remus, the most famous image associated with the founding of Rome Romulus and Remus on the House of the She-wolf at the Grand Place of Brussels. The tale of the founding of Rome is recounted in traditional stories handed down by the ancient Romans themselves as the earliest history of their city in terms of legend and myth. The most familiar of these myths, and perhaps the most famous of all Roman myths, is the story of Romulus and Remus, twins who were suckled by a she-wolf as infants in the 8th century BC.[1] Another account, set earlier in time, claims that the Roman people are descended from Trojan War hero Aeneas, who escaped to Italy after the war, and whose son, Iulus, was the ancestor of the family of Julius Caesar.[2] The archaeological evidence of human occupation of the area of modern-day Rome, Italy dates from about 14,000 years ago.[citation needed][3] Contents 1 Founding myths and sources 1.1 Aeneas 1.2 Romulus and Remus 1.3 Strabo 1.4 Dionysius of Halicarnassus 1.5 Other myths 2 Date 3 The name of Rome 4 Archaeology 5 Later commemoration 6 References 7 Further reading 8 External links Founding myths and sources[edit] Aeneas[edit] Aeneas flees burning Troy, Federico Barocci, 1598. Galleria Borghese, Rome. The national epic of mythical Rome, the Aeneid of Virgil, tells the story of how Trojan prince Aeneas came to Italy. The Aeneid was written under Augustus, who claimed ancestry through Julius Caesar to Aeneas and his mother Venus. According to the Aeneid, the survivors from the fallen city of Troy banded together under Aeneas and underwent a series of adventures around the Mediterranean Sea, including a stop at newly founded Carthage under the rule of Queen Dido, eventually reaching the Italian coast. The Trojans were thought to have landed in an area between modern Anzio and Fiumicino, southwest of Rome, probably at Laurentum or, in other versions, at Lavinium, a place named for Lavinia, the daughter of King Latinus whom Aeneas married. This started a series of armed conflicts with Turnus over the marriage of Lavinia.[4] Before the arrival of Aeneas, Turnus was betrothed to Lavinia, who then married Aeneas, starting the war.[4] Aeneas won the war and killed Turnus.[4] The Trojans won the right to stay and to assimilate with the local peoples. The young son of Aeneas, Ascanius, also known as Iulus, went on to found Alba Longa and the line of Alban kings who filled the chronological gap between the Trojan saga and the traditional founding of Rome in the 8th century BC. Toward the end of this line, King Procas was the father of Numitor and Amulius. At Procas' death, Numitor became king of Alba Longa, but Amulius captured him and sent him to prison; he also forced Numitor's daughter Rhea Silvia to become a virgin priestess among the Vestals.[1] Forests have a prominent role in the founding myth – when Aeneas arrives at the site that would become Rome, it is still forest: These woodland places Once were homes of local fauns and myths Together with a race of men that came From tree trunks, from hard oak: they had no way Of settled life, no arts of life, no skill At yoking oxen, gathering provisions Practising husbandry, but got their food From oaken bough and wild game hunted down. —Aeneid 8.415–429, trans. Harrison Forests: The Shadow of Civilization p.1 Evander goes on to explain that from that "first time" the god Saturn brings these scattered people laws and bestows upon them the name Latium.[5] Romulus and Remus[edit] Main articles: Romulus and Remus and Romulus The myth of Aeneas was of Greek origin and had to be reconciled with the Italian myth of Romulus and Remus. They were purported to be sons of Rhea Silvia and either Mars, the god of war, or the demigod hero Hercules. They were abandoned at birth, in the manner of many mythological heroes, because of a prophecy that they would overthrow their great-uncle Amulius, who had overthrown Silvia's father Numitor. The twins were abandoned on the river Tiber by servants who took pity on the infants, despite their orders. The twins were nurtured by a she-wolf until a shepherd named Faustulus found the boys and took them as his sons. Faustulus and his wife Acca Larentia raised the children. When Remus and Romulus became adults, they killed Amulius and restored Numitor. They decided to establish a city; however, they quarreled, as Romulus was on Palatine Hill, while Remus wanted to found the city on Aventine Hill, until Remus and his followers attacked, and Romulus killed his brother.[1] Thus, Rome began with a fratricide, a story that was later taken to represent the city's history of internecine political strife and bloodshed. Strabo[edit] Strabo writes that there is also an older story, about the founding of Rome, than the previous legends that he had mentioned. The city was an Arcadian colony and was founded by Evander. Strabo also writes that Lucius Coelius Antipater believed that Rome was founded by Greeks.[6][7] Dionysius of Halicarnassus[edit] Dionysius of Halicarnassus writes that the people who came to the lands that later became the city of Rome were first the Aborigines, who drove the Sicels out of these lands, and were from the Arcadia, then the Pelasgians, who came from Thessaly. Third came those who accompanied Evander into Italy from the city of Pallantium in Arcadia; next the Epeans from Elis and Pheneats from Pheneus, who were part of the army commanded by Heracles which decided to stay there while they were returning from the expedition at the Erytheia, with whom a Trojan element also was commingled. Last of all came Trojans who had escaped with Aeneas from Ilium, Dardanus, and the other Trojan cities. Dionysius mentions that the Trojans were also Greek people who were originally from the Peloponnesus.[8] He also adds that even Romans say that the Pallantium was founded by Greeks from Pallantium of Arcadia, about sixty years before the Trojan War and the leader was Evander.[9] Later at the sixteenth generation after the Trojan War the Albans united these places into one settlement, surrounding them with a wall and a ditch. The Albans were a mixed nation composed of all the above people. Dionysius adds that it is possible that a barbarian element from among the neighboring people or a remnant of the ancient inhabitants of the place were mixed with the Greek. But all these people, having lost their tribal past came to be called by one common name, Latins, after Latinus, who had been the king of the country. The leaders of the colony were the twin brothers Romulus and Remus.[10] Other myths[edit] Another story told how Romos, a son of Odysseus and Circe, was the one who founded Rome.[11] Martin P. Nilsson speculates that this older story was becoming a bit embarrassing as Rome became more powerful and tensions with the Greeks grew. Being descendants of the Greeks was no longer preferable, so the Romans settled on the Trojan foundation myth instead. Nilsson further speculates that the name of Romos was changed by the Romans to the native name Romulus, but the name Romos (later changed to the native Remus) was never forgotten by the people, and so these two names came to stand side by side as founders of the city.[12] Furthermore, Emperor Julian in his satire called "The Caesars", which describes a contest between the previous Roman emperors with Alexander the Great called in as an extra contestant in the presence of the assembled gods, made Alexander say: "I am aware that you Romans are yourselves descended from the Greeks,..."[13] Date[edit] The ancient Romans were certain of the day Rome was founded: April 21, the day of the festival sacred to Pales, goddess of shepherds, on which date they celebrated the Par ilia (or Palilia). However they did not know, or they were uncertain of, the exact year the city had been founded; this is one reason they preferred to date their years by the presiding consuls rather than using the formula A.U.C. or Ab Urbe Condita. Several dates had been proposed by ancient authorities, and Dionysius of Halicarnassus records these: The Greek historian Timaeus, one of the first to write a history to include the Romans, stated that Rome was founded in the 38th year prior to the first Olympiad, or 814/3 BC; Quintus Fabius Pictor, the first Roman to write the history of his people, in Greek, stated Rome was founded in the first year of the eighth Olympiad, or 748/7 BC; Lucius Cincius Alimentus claimed Rome was founded in the fourth year of the twelfth Olympiad, or 729/8 BC; and Cato the Elder calculated that Rome was founded 432 years after the Trojan War, which Dionysius states was equivalent to the first year of the seventh Olympiad, or 752/1 BC.[14] Dionysius himself provided calculations showing that Rome was founded in 751 BC, starting with the Battle of the Allia, which he dated to the first year of the ninety-eighth Olympiad, 388/7 BC, then added 120 years to reach the date of the first consuls, Junius Brutus and Tarquinius Collatinus, 508/7 BC, then added the combined total of the reigns of the Kings of Rome (244 years) to arrive at his own date, 751 BC.[15] Even the official Fasti Capitolini offers its own date, 752 BC. The most familiar date given for the foundation of Rome, 753 BC, was derived by the Roman antiquarian Titus Pomponius Atticus, and adopted by Marcus Terentius Varro, having become part of what has come to be known as the Varronian chronology.[16] An anecdote in Plutarch where the astrologer Lucius Tarrutius of Firmum provides an argument based on a non-existent eclipse and other erroneous astronomical details that Rome was founded in 753 BC suggests that this had become the most commonly accepted date.[17] Through its use by the third-century writer Censorinus, whose De Die Natali was the ultimate influence of Joseph Justus Scaliger's work to establish a scientific basis of ancient chronology, it became familiar.[17] Recent discoveries by Andrea Carandini on Rome's Palatine Hill have also yielded evidence of a series of fortification walls on the north slope that can be dated to the middle of the 8th century BC.[citation needed] According to the legend, Romulus plowed a furrow (sulcus) around the hill in order to mark the boundary of his new city. The name of Rome[edit] Further information: History of Rome There is no consensus on the etymology of the city's name. Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712–1778) suggested Greek "ῥώμη" (rhōmē), meaning "strength, vigor".[18] A modern theory of etymology holds that the name of the city is of Etruscan origin (and perhaps the city itself, though this cannot be proven), derived from rumon, "river".[19] Archaeology[edit] There is archaeological evidence of human occupation of the Rome area from about 14,000 years ago, but the dense layer of much younger debris obscures Palaeolithic and Neolithic sites.[20] Several excavations support the view that Rome grew from pastoral settlements on the Palatine Hill built above the area of the future Roman Forum. Between the end of the Bronze Age and the beginning of the Iron Age, each hill between the sea and the Capitol was topped by a village (on the Capitol Hill, a village is attested since the end of the 14th century BC).[21] In any case, the location that became the city of Rome was inhabited by Latin settlers from various regions, farmers and pastoralists, as evidenced by differences in pottery and burial techniques.[19] The historical Latins were originally an Italic tribe who inhabited the Alban Hills.[when?] They later moved down into the valleys, which provided better land for agriculture. The island Isola Tiberina was the site of an important ancient ford. The area around the Tiber was particularly advantageous and offered notable strategic resources: the river was a natural border on one side, and the hills could provide a safe defensive position on the other side. This position would also have enabled the Latins to control the river and the commercial and military traffic on it from the natural observation point at Isola Tiberina. Moreover, road traffic could be controlled, since Rome was at the intersection of the principal roads to the sea coming from Sabinum (in the northeast) and Etruria (to the northwest).[citation needed] There is a wide consensus that the city developed gradually through the aggregation ("synoecism") of several villages around the largest one on the Palatine. This aggregation, signalling the transition from a proto-urban to an urban settlement, was made possible by the increase in agricultural productivity above the subsistence level, which allowed the establishment of secondary and tertiary activities[clarification needed]: in turn, these boosted the development of trade with the Greek colonies of southern Italy (mainly Ischia and Cumae). All these events, which according to the archeological excavations occurred around the mid 8th century BC, can be considered as the origin of the city.[21] Recent studies suggest that the Quirinal hill was very important in ancient times, although the first hill to be inhabited seems to have been the Palatine (thus confirming the legend), which is also at the centre of ancient Rome.[citation needed] Its three peaks, the minor hills Cermalus or Germalus, Palatium, and Velia, were united with the three peaks of the Esquiline (Cispius, Fagutal, and Oppius), and then villages on the Caelian Hill and Suburra. Recent discoveries revealed that the Germalus on the northern part of the Palatine was the site of a village (dated to the 9th century BC) with circular or elliptical dwellings. It was protected by a clay wall (perhaps reinforced with wood), and it is likely that this is the particular location on the Palatine hill where Rome was actually founded.[citation needed] The territory of this federation was surrounded by a sacred border called the pomerium, which enclosed the so-called Servian[clarification needed] expansion of Rome. Festivals for the Septimontium (literally "of the seven hills") on December 11 were previously considered to be related to the foundation of Rome. However, April 21 is the only date for Rome's foundation upon which all the legends agree, and it has recently been argued that Septimontium celebrated the first federations among Roman hills. A similar federation was, in fact, celebrated by the Latins at Cave or at Monte Cavo (in Castelli).[citation needed] Later commemoration[edit] During the Italian Renaissance, a group of humanists affiliated with the Roman Academy formed a sodality to pursue antiquarian interests, celebrating the "birthday of Rome" annually on April 20. In 1468, the Academy was suppressed by Pope Paul II for fomenting "republicanism, paganism, and conspiracy", but the sodality was reinstated about ten years later under Sixtus IV as the Societas Literatorum S. Victoris in Esquiliis ("Literary Society of Saint Victor on the Esquiline"). The reformed group placed itself under the new patronage of saints Victor, Fortunatus, and Genesius, "whose feast day was conveniently proven to coincide with the Palilia". Their "Palilia" was organized by Pomponio Leto and featured speeches, a communal meal, and a poetry competition.[22] References[edit] ^ a b c Livy (1905). "The Earliest Legends". From the Founding of the City . Translated by Canon Roberts. Book 1.3–1.7  – via Wikisource. ^ Livy (2005). The Early History of Rome. Penguin Books Ltd. ISBN 978-0-14-196307-5. ^ "The Capitoline Wolf". Joy of Museums. Retrieved 21 September 2020. ^ a b c "Turnus". Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved 2013-09-13. ^ Harrison, Robert Pogue (1993). Forests: The Shadow of Civilization. University of Chicago Press. p. 2. ^ Strabo, Geography, 5.3.3 – GR ^ Strabo, Geography, 5.3.3 – EN ^ Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Roman Antiquities, 1.60.3–1.61.1 This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain. ^ Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Roman Antiquities, 1.45.1 ^ Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Roman Antiquities, 2.2 ^ Goldberg, Epic in Republican Rome, 1995, p. 50-51. ^ Nilsson, Olympen, 1964, p. 264. ^ Julian : The Caesars, 324 ^ Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Roman Antiquities 1.74 ^ Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Roman Antiquities 1.75 ^ Gary Forsythe, A Critical History of Early Rome (Berkeley: University of California, 2005), p. 94 ^ a b Anthony Grafton and Noel Swerdlow, "Technical Chronology and Astrological History in Varro, Censorinus, and Others", Classical Quarterly, N.S. 35 (1985), p. 454-65 ^ Cf. Jean-Jacques Rousseau, The Social Contract, Book IV, Chapter IV, written in 1762, where he writes in a footnote that the word for Rome is Greek in origin and means force. "There are writers who say that the name 'Rome' is derived from 'Romulus'. It is in fact Greek and means force." ^ a b Baldi, Philip (2002). The Foundations of Latin. Walter de Gruyter. pp. 106–7. ^ Heiken, G., Funiciello, R. and De Rita, D. (2005), The Seven Hills of Rome: A Geological Tour of the Eternal City. Princeton University Press ^ a b Coarelli (1984) p. 9 ^ Angela Fritsen, "Ludovico Lazzarelli's Fasti Christianae religionis: Recipient and Context of an Ovidian Poem," in Myricae: Essays on Neo-Latin Literature in Memory of Jozef Ijsewijn (Leuven University Press, 2000), pp. 121–122. Further reading[edit] Coarelli, F. 1974. Guida archeologica di Roma. 1. ed. Varia Grandi opere. [Milano]: A. Mondadori. Caradini, Andrea. 2011. Rome: Day One. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Forsythe, Gary. 2005. A Critical History of Early Rome: From Prehistory to the First Punic War. Berkeley: University of California Press. Fromentin, Valérie and Sophie Gotteland, ed. 2001. Origines Gentium, Collection Etudes 7. Bordeaux: Editions Ausonius. Lintott, Andrew. 2010. The Romans in the Age of Augustus. The Peoples of Europe. Chichester/Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Raaflaub, Kurt A, and Tim Cornell. 1986. Social Struggles In Archaic Rome : New Perspectives On the Conflict of the Orders. Berkeley: University of California Press. Schultze, C. E. 1995. "Dionysius of Halicarnassus and Roman Chronology." Cambridge Classical Journal 41:192–214. Serres, Michel. 1991. Rome: The Book of Foundations. Trans. Felicia McCarren. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Slayman, Andrew. 2007. "Fact or Legend? Debate Over the Origins of Rome – Were Romulus and Remus Historical Figures?." Archaeology 60.4:22–27. Wiseman, T.P. 1995. Remus: A Roman Myth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Wiseman, T. P. 2004. The Myths of Rome. Exeter: University of Exeter Press. External links[edit] Library resources about Founding of Rome Online books Resources in your library Resources in other libraries History of Rome by Theodor Mommsen v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films v t e Etruscan-related topics History Origins Villanovan culture Padanian Etruria Founding of Rome Tyrrhenus Tyrrhenians Tarchon Caelius Vibenna Capys Lucius Tarquinius Priscus Tanaquil Servius Tullius Lucius Tarquinius Superbus Aruns (son of Tarquinius Superbus) Lars Porsena Lars Tolumnius Titus Vestricius Spurinna Culture and society Apollo of Veii Architecture Art Chimera of Arezzo Coins Corpus Speculorum Etruscorum Etruscan League Etruscan names for Greek heroes Etruscan Sibyl Extispicy Fanum Voltumnae Haruspex Jewelry Lausus Liver of Piacenza Mezentius Mythological figures Mythology Persius Poppilia Raeti Religion Sarcophagus of the Spouses Tages Terracotta warriors Titus Lartius Tomb of the Roaring Lions Vulca Military history Battle of Alalia (540 BC–535 BC) Siege of Rome (509 BC) Siege of Rome (508 BC) Battle of the Cremera (477 BC) Battle of Cumae (474 BC) Battle of Fidenae (437 BC) Capture of Fidenae (435 BC) Battle of Veii (c. 396 BC) Battle of Lake Vadimo (310 BC) Battle of Populonia (282 BC) Language Alphabet Cippus Perusinus Corpus Inscriptionum Etruscarum Liber Linteus Pyrgi Tablets Raetic language Lemnian language Tabula Capuana Tabula Cortonensis Tyrsenian languages Spanish words of Etruscan origin English words of Etruscan origin Archeology Bucchero Cuniculi Etruscology Impasto (pottery) Monteleone Chariot National Etruscan Museum Negau helmet Portonaccio Tomb of Orcus Tumulus of Montefortini Vicus Tuscus Key sites Acquarossa Adria Aleria Baratti Bologna Caere Ceri Cerveteri Civita di Bagnoregio Clusium Cumae Etruria Falerii Fescennia Fidenae Norchia Orvieto Perusia Poggio Colla Populonia Pyrgi Rusellae San Giovenale Spina Tarquinia Tuscania Veii Vetulonia Vie Cave Volsinii Volterra Vulci Portal Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Founding_of_Rome&oldid=994995385" Categories: 8th century BC in the Roman Kingdom Ancient city of Rome City founding Etruscan mythology Origin myths Roman mythology Romulus and Remus She-wolf (Roman mythology) Hidden categories: Articles with short description Short description matches Wikidata All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from June 2020 Articles with unsourced statements from March 2019 Articles containing Ancient Greek (to 1453)-language text All articles with vague or ambiguous time Vague or ambiguous time from March 2014 Articles with unsourced statements from April 2020 Wikipedia articles needing clarification from April 2017 Articles with unsourced statements from February 2019 Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Afrikaans العربية Asturianu Català Dansk Deutsch Español Esperanto Français Galego Հայերեն Hrvatski Interlingua Íslenska Italiano עברית ქართული Latina Nederlands 日本語 Occitan Patois Polski Português Română Русский Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Türkçe Українська Tiếng Việt 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 18 December 2020, at 17:06 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2933 ---- Master of the Horse - Wikipedia Master of the Horse From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search This article includes a list of general references, but it remains largely unverified because it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (March 2012) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) Lord Vestey, Master of the Horse (UK) 1999–2018, riding to the Queen's Birthday Parade in 2009. The Master of the Horse was (and in some cases, still is) a position of varying importance in several European nations. Contents 1 Magister Equitum (Ancient Rome) 2 Master of the Horse (United Kingdom) 3 Grand Squire of France 4 Oberststallmeister (Germany) 5 Caballerizo mayor (Spain) 6 Papal Master of the Horse 7 Riksstallmästare/Överhovstallmästare (Sweden) 8 Equerry (Russia) 9 Koniuszy (Kingdom of Poland and Grand Duchy of Lithuania) 10 Georgia 11 Hungary 12 Asia 13 See also 14 References Magister Equitum (Ancient Rome)[edit] Main article: Magister equitum The original Master of the Horse (Latin Magister Equitum) in the Roman Republic was an office appointed and dismissed by the Roman Dictator, as it expired with the Dictator's own office, typically a term of six months in the early and mid-republic. The Magister Equitum served as the Dictator's main lieutenant. The nomination of the Magister Equitum was left to the choice of the Dictator, unless a senatus consultum specified, as was sometimes the case, the name of the person who was to be appointed. The Dictator could not be without a Magister Equitum to assist him, and, consequently, if the first Magister Equitum either died or was dismissed during the Dictator's term, another had to be nominated in his stead. The Magister Equitum was granted a form of imperium, but at the same level as a praetor, and thus was subject to the imperium of the Dictator and was not superior to that of a Consul. In the Dictator's absence, the Magister Equitum became his representative, and exercised the same powers as the Dictator. It was usually but not always necessary for the man nominated as Magister Equitum to have already held the office of Praetor. Accordingly, the Magister Equitum had the insignia of a praetor: the toga praetexta and an escort of six lictors. The most famous Master of the Horse is Mark Antony, who served during Julius Caesar's first dictatorship. After the constitutional reforms of Augustus, the office of Dictator fell into disuse, along with that of the Magister Equitum. The title magister equitum was revived in the late Empire, when Constantine I established it as one of the supreme military ranks, alongside the Magister Peditum ("Master of the Foot"). Eventually, the two offices would be amalgamated into that of the Magister Militum ("Master of the Soldiers"). The title Constable, from the Latin comes stabuli or count of the stables, has a similar history. Master of the Horse (United Kingdom)[edit] See also: List of Masters of the Horse and List of Masters of the Horse to British royal consorts Dress uniform of the Master of the Horse. The Master of the Horse in the United Kingdom was once an important official of the sovereign's household, though the role is largely ceremonial today. The master of the horse is the third dignitary of the court, and was always a member of the ministry (before 1782 the office was of cabinet rank), a peer and a privy councillor. All matters connected with the horses and formerly also the hounds of the sovereign, as well as the stables and coachhouses, the stud, mews and previously the kennels, are within his jurisdiction. The practical management of the Royal Stables and stud devolves on the chief or Crown Equerry, formerly called the Gentleman of the Horse, whose appointment was always permanent. The Clerk Marshal had the supervision of the accounts of the department before they are submitted to the Board of Green Cloth, and was in waiting on the Sovereign on state occasions only. Exclusive of the Crown Equerry there were seven regular equerries, besides extra and honorary equerries, one of whom was always in attendance on the Sovereign and rode at the side of the royal carriage. They were always officers of the army, and each of them was on duty for about the same time as the lords and grooms in waiting. There are still several pages of honour who are nominally in the master of the horse's department, who must not be confounded with the pages of various kinds who are in the department of the Lord Chamberlain. They are youths aged from twelve to sixteen, selected by the sovereign in person, to attend on him at state ceremonies. At the Coronation they assisted the groom of the stole in carrying the royal train. The current Master of the Horse is Lord de Mauley.[1] Today the Master of the Horse has a primarily ceremonial office, and rarely appears except on state occasions, and especially when the Sovereign is mounted. The Crown Equerry has daily oversight of the Royal Mews, which provides vehicular transport for the Sovereign, both cars and horse-drawn carriages. Train travel is arranged by the Royal Travel Office, which also co-ordinates air transport. The Pages of Honour, who appear only on ceremonial occasions, and the Equerries, were nominally under the authority of the Master of the Horse. The former are now controlled by the Keeper of the Privy Purse. The latter are effectively independent, and are functionally closer to the Private Secretary's Office. There are now three equerries to the Sovereign, and a larger number of extra equerries - usually retired officers with some connection to the Royal Household. The extra equerries are rarely if ever required for duty, but the Equerries are in attendance on the Sovereign on a daily basis. For some years the senior Equerry has also held the position of Deputy Master of the Household. The permanent equerry is an officer of major rank or equivalent, recruited from the three armed services in turn. Many previous equerries have gone on to reach high rank. The temporary equerry is a Captain of the Coldstream Guards, who provides part-time attendance. When not required for duty he has additional regimental or staff duties. Senior members of the Royal Family also have one or two equerries. Grand Squire of France[edit] Main article: Grand Squire of France In France the master of the horse, known as the Grand Squire of France (Grand Écuyer, or more usually Monsieur le grand) was one of the seven Great Officers of the Crown of France from 1595. As well as the superintendence of the royal stables, he had that of the retinue of the sovereign, also the charge of the funds set aside for the religious functions of the court, coronations, etc. On the death of a sovereign he had the right to all the horses and their equipment in the royal stables. He oversaw personally the "Great Stable" ("grande écurie"). Distinct from this officer and independent of him, was the first equerry (Premier Ecuyer), who had charge of the horses which the sovereign used personally (La petite écurie), and who attended on him when he rode out. The office of master of the horse existed down to the reign of Louis XVI. Under Louis XVIII and Charles X the duties were discharged by the first equerry, but under Napoleon I and Napoleon III the office was revived with much of its old importance. Oberststallmeister (Germany)[edit] In Germany the master of the horse (Oberststallmeister) was a high court dignitary; but his office was merely titular, the superintendence of the Emperor's stables having been carried out by the Oberstallmeister, an official corresponding to the crown equerry in England. Caballerizo mayor (Spain)[edit] Main article: Caballerizo mayor The Caballerizo mayor was the Officer of the Royal Household and Heritage of the Crown of Spain in charge of the trips, the mews and the hunt of the King of Spain. The Office of "Caballerizo mayor" was one of the main Offices of the Royal Household in charge of the Royal Stables and everything related to the transportation of the Monarch. When the King sorted out from the Royal Palace, the Caballerizo had the main position behind him and the major rang over the other Court Officials. He managed as well the stables, the carriages and the horses. He was assisted by the "Primeros Caballerizos" (First Equerries) who were nominated by him. He was in charge of the Royal hunt as "Montero mayor" (Great Hunter) holding, in many cases, the "Alcaldías" (Majorships) of the Spanish royal sites. Papal Master of the Horse[edit] The Master of the Horse, Cavallerizzo Maggiore, or Hereditary Superintendent of the Stables of the Palaces, was a hereditary position held by the Marquess Serlupi Crescenzi. The office was a Participating Privy Chamberlain of the Sword and Cape, in the papal household. It was abolished in the reforms of the Papal Curia of 1968. Riksstallmästare/Överhovstallmästare (Sweden)[edit] The holder of the title Master of the Horse of the Realm (Riksstallmästare) in Sweden was not one of the Great Officers of the Realm, but rather one of the Lesser Officers of the Realm. He was the superintendent of the Royal Stables and of the realm's stud farms. As such he was important in military matters, and often he had a tight connection with the army, and then especially with the army's cavalry units. His duties were partly taken over by the Master of the Horse (Överhovstallmästare). Equerry (Russia)[edit] Konyushy (Russian: Конюший) is literally translated as Master of the Horse or Equerry. Konyushy was a boyar in charge of the stables of Russian rulers. It was a high title at the court of Russian rulers until the 17th century. By the end of the 15th century a special Equerry Office (конюшенный приказ, "konyushenny prikaz") was introduced, headed by the Konyushy. It was in charge of the Tsar's stables, parade equipage, ceremonies of court ride-offs, and military horse breeding. At one point Boris Godunov was konyushy. The Equerry Office handled a significant amount of Tsar's treasures, related to harness and horse/horseman armor, which were transferred to the Kremlin Armoury in 1736. Koniuszy (Kingdom of Poland and Grand Duchy of Lithuania)[edit] "Koniuszy" (corresponding to the English-language "Equerry" or "Master of the Horse") was a position of nobility known in the Kingdom of Poland from the 11th century, and in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania from the 15th. A koniuszy had charge of the stables and herds of a Grand Duke or King; in reality, it was a podkoniuszy (sub-equerry), subordinate to the koniuszy, who had the more direct responsibility. From the 14th to 16th centuries, a "koniuszy" was a dignitary (dygnitarz) in the Polish Kingdom and in the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth. Georgia[edit] In the Kingdom of Georgia, the similar post was known under the name of amilakhvari (amir-akhori, lit.: Prince-Master of the Horse), derived from Arabic. It was a deputy to the commander-in-chief (amir-spasalari) and a member of the royal council. From the 1460s to the Russian annexation of Georgia (1801), the office was hereditary in the Zevdginidze-Amilakhvari family. Hungary[edit] Main article: Master of the horse (Kingdom of Hungary) In the Kingdom of Hungary the master of the horse (Hungarian: főlovászmester) was one of the high officials of the royal household. Asia[edit] Main article: Sima (office) Similar posts were common in the imperial courts of China and Japan, the royal courts of Korea, and elsewhere in East Asia. The position, known as "Sima" in Chinese (司马), literally means "Master of the Horse". It was first created in the Western Zhou dynasty, with responsibility for military administration and conscription. The position was below the Three Grand Offices and equivalent in status to the six ministers. It was often grouped with four other positions also named with the "Si-" (control, administer) prefix as the "five officials" (五官). The title was used in different ways in subsequent dynasties. The Han Dynasty awarded "Grand Sima" as an additional title to high generals, in which context it is often translated into English as "Marshal". "Sima" also became a Chinese surname, adopted by descendants of one occupant of the office. The Sima family became emperors in the Jin dynasty, as a result of which "Sima" ceased to exist as an official position in the central bureaucracy. However, in later dynasties it was used as the name of various relatively minor positions in the military and local administration. However, "Sima" was also used informally to refer to the Minister of War. The Siamese kingdom of Ayutthaya had a Master of the Royal Elephants. See also[edit] Constitution of the Roman Republic Constable Equerry Cursus honorum List of British ministries Marshal References[edit] ^ "Appendix To Court Circular". Court Circular. 26 July 2018. Retrieved 28 July 2018.  This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Master of the Horse". Encyclopædia Britannica. 17 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 872–873. v t e Royal Household in England Household officials Lord Steward of the Household The Earl of Dalhousie Lord Chamberlain of the Household The Earl Peel Master of the Horse The Lord de Mauley Treasurer of the Household Stuart Andrew Comptroller of the Household Mike Freer Vice-Chamberlain of the Household Marcus Jones Justiciar (1102–1261) Mareschal Knight Marshal Lord High Steward Keeper of the Privy Seal Lord Chancellor Keeper (or Treasurer) of the Wardrobe Comptroller of the Wardrobe Cofferer of the Wardrobe Keeper of the Great Wardrobe Master of the Jewel Office Clerk of the Green Cloth Treasurer of the Chamber Keeper of the Privy Purse Master of the Household Master of the Buckhounds Master of the Staghounds (1738–1782) Lord of the Bedchamber Gentleman of the Bedchamber Groom of the Chamber Mistress of the Robes Lady of the Bedchamber Woman of the Bedchamber Page of Honour Master of the Robes Groom of the Robes Groom of the Stool (1509–1901) Gold Stick-in-Waiting Silver Stick-in-Waiting Dean of the Chapel Royal Clerk of the Closet Deputy Clerk of the Closet Lord High Almoner Warden of the Mint (1216–1829) Master of the Revels Master of the Hawks Master of the Ceremonies Master of the Queen's Music Surveyor of the Queen's Pictures Queen's Bargemaster Yeomen Warders Bold: Title active Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Master_of_the_Horse&oldid=976226315" Categories: Ceremonial officers in the United Kingdom Ancient Roman titles Military ranks Positions within the British Royal Household Equestrianism Ancient Roman Masters of the Horse Cursus honorum Papal household Hidden categories: Articles lacking in-text citations from March 2012 All articles lacking in-text citations Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica with Wikisource reference Wikipedia articles incorporating text from the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Беларуская Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ Italiano Lietuvių Polski Русский Svenska Українська Edit links This page was last edited on 1 September 2020, at 21:12 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-290 ---- Victorian era - Wikipedia Victorian era From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia   (Redirected from Victorian Age) Jump to navigation Jump to search Period of British history encompassing Queen Victoria's reign (1837–1901) Victorian era 1837–1901 Queen Victoria in 1859 by Winterhalter Preceded by Regency era Followed by Edwardian era Monarch(s) Victoria Leader(s) The Viscount Melbourne Sir Robert Peel Lord John Russell The Earl of Derby The Earl of Aberdeen The Viscount Palmerston Benjamin Disraeli William Ewart Gladstone The Marquess of Salisbury The Earl of Rosebery Part of a series on the History of the United Kingdom Timeline Georgian period Napoleonic Wars Regency period Victorian period Edwardian period First World War Interwar period Second World War Post-war period (political) Post-war period (Social) Modern history (political) Modern History (social) Topics History of women Military history  United Kingdom portal v t e Periods in English history   Prehistoric Britain until c. 43 Roman Britain c. 43–410 Anglo-Saxon c. 500–1066 Norman 1066–1154 Plantagenet 1154–1485 Tudor 1485–1603 Elizabethan 1558–1603 Stuart 1603–1714 Jacobean 1603–1625 Caroline 1625–1649 (Interregnum) 1649–1660 Restoration 1660–1714 Georgian Britain 1714–1837 Regency Britain 1811–1820 Victorian Britain 1837–1901 Edwardian Britain 1901–1914 First World War 1914–1918 Interwar Britain 1919–1939 Second World War 1939–1945 Postwar Britain (Political) 1945–1979 Postwar Britain (Social) 1945–1979 See also Political history (1979–present) Social history (1979–present) Timeline v t e Part of a series on the History of Scotland Eras Prehistoric (timeline) During the Roman Empire Middle Ages Early High Late Early Modern Modern History (timeline) Rule House of Alpin (843–878; 889–1040) House of Moray (1040–1058) House of Dunkeld (1058–1286) House of Balliol (1292–1296) House of Bruce (1306–1371) House of Stuart (1371–1652) (1660–1707) Commonwealth (1652–1660) Acts of Union 1707 Topics Scandinavian Scotland Wars of independence Renaissance Reformation Restoration Glorious Revolution Colonization of the Americas Enlightenment Romanticism Clans The Scots language Economics Education Military Maritime Historiography Demography Natural history Culture Architecture Art The Kilt Literature Politics Devolution Local government Scottish National Party Scottish Socialist Party Sport Football Rugby union National football team Golf Religion Christianity Scottish Reformation Scottish Episcopal Church Great Disruption Jews and Judaism Islam and Muslims By Region Edinburgh timeline Glasgow timeline  Scotland portal v t e In the history of the United Kingdom, the Victorian era was the period of Queen Victoria's reign, from 20 June 1837 until her death on 22 January 1901. The era followed the Georgian period and preceded the Edwardian period, and its later half overlaps with the first part of the Belle Époque era of Continental Europe. Morally and politically, this period began with the passage of the Reform Act 1832. There was a strong religious drive for higher moral standards led by the nonconformist churches, such as the Methodists, and the Evangelical wing of the established Church of England. Ideologically, the Victorian era witnessed resistance to the rationalism that defined the Georgian period and an increasing turn towards romanticism and even mysticism with regard to religion, social values, and arts.[1] Technologically, this era saw a staggering amount of innovations that proved key to Britain's power and prosperity.[2][3] Doctors started moving away from tradition and mysticism towards a science-based approach; modern medicine saw the light of day thanks to the adoption of the germ theory of disease and pioneering research in epidemiology.[4] Multiple studies suggest that on the per-capita basis, the numbers of significant innovations in science and technology and of scientific geniuses peaked during the Victorian era and have been on the decline ever since.[5] Domestically, the political agenda was increasingly liberal, with a number of shifts in the direction of gradual political reform, social reform, and the widening of the franchise. There were unprecedented demographic changes: the population of England and Wales almost doubled from 16.8 million in 1851 to 30.5 million in 1901,[6] and Scotland's population also rose rapidly, from 2.8 million in 1851 to 4.4 million in 1901. However, Ireland's population decreased sharply, from 8.2 million in 1841 to less than 4.5 million in 1901, mostly due to emigration and the Great Famine.[7] Between 1837 and 1901 about 15 million emigrated from Great Britain, mostly to the United States, Canada, South Africa, New Zealand, and Australia.[8] Thanks to educational reforms, the British population not only approached universal literacy towards the end of the era but also became increasingly well-educated; the market for reading materials of all kinds boomed.[9][10][11] Britain's relations with the other Great Powers were driven by the colonial antagonism of the Great Game with Russia, climaxing during the Crimean War; a Pax Britannica of international free trade was maintained by the country's naval and industrial supremacy. Britain embarked on global imperial expansion, particularly in Asia and Africa, which made the British Empire the largest empire in history. National self-confidence peaked.[12][13] Britain granted political autonomy to the more advanced colonies of Australia, Canada, and New Zealand,[14] and avoided war with the United States.[15] Apart from the Crimean War, Britain was not involved in any armed conflict with another major power.[14][16] The two main political parties during the era remained the Whigs/Liberals and the Conservatives; by its end, the Labour Party had formed as a distinct political entity. These parties were led by such prominent statesmen as Lord Melbourne, Sir Robert Peel, Lord Derby, Lord Palmerston, Benjamin Disraeli, William Gladstone, and Lord Salisbury. The unsolved problems relating to Irish Home Rule played a great part in politics in the later Victorian era, particularly in view of Gladstone's determination to achieve a political settlement in Ireland. Contents 1 Terminology and periodisation 2 Political and diplomatic history 2.1 Early 2.2 Middle 2.3 Late 3 Society and culture 3.1 Common culture 3.2 Evangelicals, utilitarians, and reform 3.3 Religion 3.3.1 Status of Nonconformist churches 3.3.2 Agnostics and freethinkers 3.4 Marriage and family 3.5 Education and literacy 3.6 Reading culture 3.7 Entertainment 3.7.1 Sports 3.8 High culture 3.8.1 Gallery of selected Victorian paintings 3.8.2 Journalism 3.8.3 Leisure 4 Demographics 4.1 Demographic transition 4.2 Fertility rates and mortality rates 5 Economy, industry, and trade 5.1 Progress 5.2 Housing 5.3 Poverty 5.4 Child labour 6 Mathematics, science, technology, and engineering 6.1 Professionalisation of science 6.2 Ease of discovery and rate of progress 6.3 Mathematics and statistics 6.4 Theoretical mechanics and optics 6.5 Thermodynamics, heat engines, and refrigerators 6.6 Natural history 6.7 Electricity, magnetism, and electrification 6.8 Computer science and logic 6.9 Communication and transportation 6.9.1 Steam ships 6.9.2 Telegraphy, telephony, the wireless, and photography 6.9.3 Railways 6.10 Public safety, health and medicine 7 Moral standards 7.1 Crime, police and prisons 7.2 Prostitution 8 Events 9 See also 10 Citations 11 Further reading 11.1 General 11.2 Daily life and culture 11.3 Literature 11.4 Politics 11.5 Crime and punishment 11.6 Historiography 11.7 Primary sources 12 External links Terminology and periodisation See also: Periodisation In the strictest sense, the Victorian era covers the duration of Victoria's reign as Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, from her accession on 20 June 1837—after the death of her uncle, William IV—until her death on 22 January 1901, after which she was succeeded by her eldest son, Edward VII. Her reign lasted for 63 years and seven months, a longer period than any of her predecessors. The term 'Victorian' was in contemporaneous usage to describe the era.[17] The era has also been understood in a more extensive sense as a period that possessed sensibilities and characteristics distinct from the periods adjacent to it, in which case it is sometimes dated to begin before Victoria's accession—typically from the passage of or agitation for (during the 1830s) the Reform Act 1832, which introduced a wide-ranging change to the electoral system of England and Wales. Definitions that purport a distinct sensibility or politics to the era have also created scepticism about the worth of the label "Victorian", though there have also been defences of it.[18] Michael Sadleir was insistent that "in truth, the Victorian period is three periods, and not one".[19] He distinguished early Victorianism – the socially and politically unsettled period from 1837 to 1850[20] – and late Victorianism (from 1880 onwards), with its new waves of aestheticism and imperialism,[21] from the Victorian heyday: mid-Victorianism, 1851 to 1879. He saw the latter period as characterized by a distinctive mixture of prosperity, domestic prudery, and complacency[22] – what G. M. Trevelyan similarly called the "mid-Victorian decades of quiet politics and roaring prosperity".[23] Political and diplomatic history Main articles: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and International relations of the Great Powers (1814–1919) Early In 1832, after much political agitation, the Reform Act was passed on the third attempt. The Act abolished many borough seats and created others in their place, as well as expanding the franchise in England and Wales (a Scottish Reform Act and Irish Reform Act were passed separately). Minor reforms followed in 1835 and 1836. On 20 June 1837, Victoria became Queen of the United Kingdom on the death of her uncle, William IV, just weeks after reaching the age of eighteen.[24] Her government was led by the Whig prime minister Lord Melbourne, to whom she was close.[24] But within two years he had resigned, and the Tory politician Sir Robert Peel attempted to form a new ministry. Peel said he was willing to become prime minister provided the Queen replaced her Whig ladies-in-waiting with Tory ones. She refused and re-appointed Lord Melbourne, a decision criticised as unconstitutional.[24] She regularly recorded the events of the rebellions on Upper and Lower Canada as these reminded her of the American Revolution, which took place during the reign of her grandfather King George III.[25] London sent Lord Durham to resolve the issue and his 1839 report opened the way for "responsible government" (that is, self-government).[14][16] In the same year, a seizure of British opium exports to China prompted the First Opium War against the Qing dynasty, and British imperial India initiated the First Anglo-Afghan War—one of the first major conflicts of the Great Game between Britain and Russia.[26] In In South Africa, the Dutch Boers made their "Great Trek to found Natal, the Transvaal, and the Orange Free State, defeating the Zulus in the process, 1835–1838; London annexed Natal in 1843 but recognized the independence of the Transvaal in 1852 in the Orange Free State in 1854.[14][16] Queen Victoria, Prince Albert, and five of their children in 1846. Painting by Franz Xaver Winterhalter. In 1840, Queen Victoria married her German cousin Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg-Saalfield. It proved a passionate marriage, whose children were much sought after by royal families across Europe. An astute diplomat, the Queen was only too willing to arrange such marriages. Indeed, she became the "Grandmother of Europe" thanks to the nine children she had with Prince Albert in just sixteen years despite suffering from postnatal depression and her dislike of childbirth. Unfortunately, she carried the gene for haemophilia, which affected ten of her male descendants, one of whom was the heir apparent of Tsar Nicholas II.[24][27] In Australia, new provinces were founded with Victoria in 1835 and South Australia in 1842. The focus shifted from transportation of criminals to voluntary immigration. New Zealand became a British colony in 1839; in 1840 Maori chiefs ceded sovereignty to Britain in Treaty of Waitangi. In 1841 New Zealand became an autonomous colony.[14][16] The signing of the Treaty of Nanking in 1842 ended the First Opium War and gave Britain control over Hong Kong Island.[16] However, a disastrous retreat from Kabul in the same year led to the annihilation of a British army column in Afghanistan. In 1845, the Great Famine began to cause mass starvation, disease and death in Ireland, sparking large-scale emigration.[28] To allow more cheap food into Ireland, the Peel government repealed the Corn Laws. Peel was replaced by the Whig ministry of Lord John Russell.[29] In 1853, Britain fought alongside France in the Crimean War against Russia. The goal was to ensure that Russia could not benefit from the declining status of the Ottoman Empire,[30] a strategic consideration known as the Eastern Question. The conflict marked a rare breach in the Pax Britannica, the period of relative peace (1815–1914) that existed among the Great Powers of the time, and especially in Britain's interaction with them. On its conclusion in 1856 with the Treaty of Paris, Russia was prohibited from hosting a military presence in Crimea. In October of the same year, the Second Opium War saw Britain overpower the Qing dynasty in China. Along with other major powers, Britain took steps in obtaining special trading and legal rights in a limited number of treaty ports.[16] It was during the Crimean War that the Queen introduced the Victoria Cross, awarded on the basis of valour and merit regardless of rank. The first Crosses were handed out to 62 men in a ceremony at Hyde Park in 1857, the first time officers and men were decorated together.[24] During 1857–58, an uprising by sepoys against the East India Company was suppressed, an event that led to the end of Company rule in India and the transferral of administration to direct rule by the British government. The princely states were not affected and remained under British guidance.[31] English was imposed as the medium of education.[16] Middle In 1861, Prince Albert died.[26] Queen Victoria went into mourning and withdrew from public life.[27] Whilst the cabinet leaned toward recognition of the Confederacy during the American Civil War, public opinion was split.[32] Confederate foreign policy planners had hoped that the value of their cotton exports would encourage European powers to intervene in their favour. It was not to be, and the British attitude might have been decisive. Being cut off from cotton did not affect the British economy as much as the Confederates had expected. A considerable supply was available to Great Britain when the American Civil War erupted and she was able to turn to India and Egypt as alternatives when that ran out.[15] In the end, the government decided to remain neutral upon realising that war with the United States would be highly dangerous, for that country provided much of Britain's food supply (especially wheat) and its navy could sink much of the merchant fleet.[32][15] U.S. ambassador to Britain Charles Francis Adams Sr. succeeded in resolving thorny problems that could have driven the two powers into war. But once it was clear that the United States had the upper hand on the battlefield, the possibility of an Anglo-American war vanished.[15] Fathers of Canadian Confederation by Robert Harris (1885). Her diary entries suggest the Queen had contemplated the possibility of a union of her North American colonies as early as February 1865. She wrote, "...we must struggle for it, and far the best it would be to let it go as an Independent Kingdom, under an English Prince!" She also mentioned how her late husband Prince Albert had hoped that one day, their sons would rule over the British colonies. In February 1867, the Queen received a copy of the British North America Act (also known as the Constitution Act 1867). A fortnight later she hosted delegates coming to discuss the question of confederation "under the name of Canada," including the future Prime Minister John A. Macdonald. On 29 March 1867, the Queen granted royal ascent to the Act, which was to become effective on 1 July 1867, allowing the delegates time to return home for celebrations.[25] In fact, the Queen maintained strong ties with Canada. Victoria in British Columbia and Victoria County in Nova Scotia were named after her, Regina in Saskatchewan in her honour, Prince Edward Island her father, and Alberta her daughter. Her birthday, Victoria Day, is an official public holiday in Canada. In addition, her daughter Princess Louise was chatelaine of Rideau Hall from 1878 to 1883 and her son the Duke of Connaught served as Governor-General of Canada between 1911 and 1916.[25] In 1867, the second Reform Act was passed, expanding the franchise. In 1871, just a year after the French Third Republic was founded, republican sentiments grew in Britain. After Prince Edward recovered from typhoid, the Queen decided to give a public thanksgiving service and appear on the balcony of Buckingham Palace. This was the start of her return to public life.[24] In 1878, Britain was a plenipotentiary at the Treaty of Berlin, which gave de jure recognition to the independent states of Romania, Serbia, and Montenegro. Late Map of the British Empire in 1898 Key leaders included Conservatives Benjamin Disraeli, and Robert Gascoyne-Cecil, 3rd Marquess of Salisbury, and Liberals William Ewart Gladstone, the Earl of Rosebery and William Harcourt.[33] They introduced various reforms aimed at strengthening the political autonomy of large industrial cities and increasing British involvement in the international stage. Labour movements were recognised and integrated in order to combat extremism. Both Queen Victoria and Prince Albert favoured moderate improvements to conditions of workers.[27] Queen Victoria found in Disraeli a trustworthy adviser. She approved of his policies which helped elevated Britain's status to global superpower. In her later years, her popularity soared as she became a symbol of the British Empire.[24] The major new policies included rapid succession, the complete abolition of slavery in the West Indies and African possessions, the end of transportation of convicts to Australia, loosening restrictions on colonial trade, and introducing responsible government.[16][14] David Livingstone led famous expeditions in central Africa, positioning Britain for favorable expansion of its colonial system in the Scramble for Africa during the 1880s. There were numerous revolts and violent conflicts in the British Empire, but there were no wars with other major nations.[16][14] In South Africa tensions escalated, especially with the discovery of gold. The result was the First Boer War in 1880–1881 and the intensely bitter Second Boer War in 1899–1902. The British finally prevailed, but lost prestige at home and abroad.[14][16] After weeks of illness, Queen Victoria died on 22 January 1901. By her bedside were her son and heir Edward VII and grandson Kaiser Wilhelm II.[24] Australia received dominion status in the same year.[34] Despite their difficult relations, Edward VII never severed ties with the Queen. Like her, he modernised the British monarchy and ensured its survival when so many European royal families collapsed as a result of the First World War.[35] Society and culture Common culture The rise of the middle class during the era had a formative effect on its character; the historian Walter E. Houghton reflects that "once the middle class attained political as well as financial eminence, their social influence became decisive. The Victorian frame of mind is largely composed of their characteristic modes of thought and feeling".[36] Industrialisation brought with it a rapidly growing middle class whose increase in numbers had a significant effect on the social strata itself: cultural norms, lifestyle, values and morality. Identifiable characteristics came to define the middle-class home and lifestyle. Previously, in town and city, residential space was adjacent to or incorporated into the work site, virtually occupying the same geographical space. The difference between private life and commerce was a fluid one distinguished by an informal demarcation of function. In the Victorian era, English family life increasingly became compartmentalised, the home a self-contained structure housing a nuclear family extended according to need and circumstance to include blood relations. The concept of "privacy" became a hallmark of the middle-class life. The English home closed up and darkened over the decade (1850s), the cult of domesticity matched by a cult of privacy. Bourgeois existence was a world of interior space, heavily curtained off and wary of intrusion, and opened only by invitation for viewing on occasions such as parties or teas. "The essential, unknowability of each individual, and society's collaboration in the maintenance of a façade behind which lurked innumerable mysteries, were the themes which preoccupied many mid-century novelists."[37] — Kate Summerscale quoting historian Anthony S. Wohl Evangelicals, utilitarians, and reform The central feature of Victorian-era politics is the search for reform and improvement, including both the individual personality and society.[38] Three powerful forces were at work. First was the rapid rise of the middle class, in large part displacing the complete control long exercised by the aristocracy. Respectability was their code—a businessman had to be trusted and must avoid reckless gambling and heavy drinking. Second, the spiritual reform closely linked to evangelical Christianity, including both the Nonconformist sects, such as the Methodists, and especially the evangelical or Low Church element in the established Church of England, typified by Lord Shaftesbury (1801–1885).[39] It imposed fresh moralistic values on society, such as Sabbath observance, responsibility, widespread charity, discipline in the home, and self-examination for the smallest faults and needs of improvement. Starting with the anti-slavery movement of the 1790s, the evangelical moralizers developed highly effective techniques of enhancing the moral sensibilities of all family members and reaching the public at large through intense, very well organized agitation and propaganda. They focused on exciting a personal revulsion against social evils and personal misbehavior.[40] Asa Briggs points out, "There were as many treatises on 'domestic economy' in mid-Victorian England as on political economy"[41] The third effect came from the liberalism of philosophical utilitarians, led by intellectuals Jeremy Bentham (1748–1832), James Mill (1773–1836) and his son John Stuart Mill (1806–1873).[42] They were not moralistic but scientific. Their movement, often called "Philosophic Radicalism," fashioned a formula for promoting the goal of "progress" using scientific rationality, and businesslike efficiency, to identify, measure, and discover solutions to social problems. The formula was an inquiry, legislation, execution, inspection, and report.[43] In public affairs, their leading exponent was Edwin Chadwick (1800–1890). Evangelicals and utilitarians shared a basic middle-class ethic of responsibility and formed a political alliance. The result was an irresistible force for reform.[44] Social reforms focused on ending slavery, removing the slavery-like burdens on women and children, and reforming the police to prevent crime, rather than emphasizing the very harsh punishment of criminals. Even more important were political reforms, especially the lifting of disabilities on nonconformists and Roman Catholics, and above all, the reform of Parliament and elections to introduce democracy and replace the old system whereby senior aristocrats controlled dozens of seats in parliament.[45] The long-term effect of the reform movements was to tightly link the nonconformist element with the Liberal party. The dissenters gave significant support to moralistic issues, such as temperance and sabbath enforcement. The nonconformist conscience, as it was called, was repeatedly called upon by Gladstone for support for his moralistic foreign policy.[46] In election after election, Protestant ministers rallied their congregations to the Liberal ticket. In Scotland, the Presbyterians played a similar role to the Nonconformist Methodists, Baptists and other groups in England and Wales.[47] The political strength of Dissent faded sharply after 1920 with the secularization of British society in the 20th century.[citation needed] Religion The restoration of the Catholic hierarchy in 1850 provoked a strong reaction. This sketch is from an issue of Punch, printed in November that year. Religion was a battleground during this era, with the Nonconformists fighting bitterly against the established status of the Church of England, especially regarding education and access to universities and public office. Penalties on Roman Catholics were mostly removed. The Vatican restored the English Catholic bishoprics in 1850 and numbers grew through conversions and immigration from Ireland.[48] The Oxford Movement was also occurring around this time, which would draw in new converts to the Catholic Church; among these was John Henry Newman. Secularism and doubts about the accuracy of the Old Testament grew as the scientific outlooked rapidly gained ground among the better educated. Walter E. Houghton argues, "Perhaps the most important development in 19th-century intellectual history was the extension of scientific assumptions and methods from the physical world to the whole life of man."[49] During the mid-nineteenth century, there were two distinct religious mentalities among British academics. The North British school was religiously conservative and commercially engaged thanks to the influence of Presbyterianism and Calvinism. Northern English and Scottish researchers played a key role in the development of thermodynamics, which was motivated by the desire to design ever more efficient engines. By contrast, in the South, mentalities of Anglicanism, agnosticism, and even atheism were more common. Academics such as the biologist Thomas Huxley promoted "scientific naturalism."[50] Status of Nonconformist churches Nonconformist conscience describes the moral sensibility of the Nonconformist churches—those which dissent from the established Church of England—that influenced British politics in the 19th and early 20th centuries.[51][52] In the 1851 census of church attendance, non-conformists who went to chapel comprised half the attendance of Sunday services.[53] Nonconformists were focused in the fast-growing urban middle class.[54] The two categories of this group were in addition to the evangelicals or "Low Church" element in the Church of England: "Old Dissenters," dating from the 16th and 17th centuries, included Baptists, Congregationalists, Quakers, Unitarians, and Presbyterians outside Scotland; "New Dissenters" emerged in the 18th century and were mainly Methodists. The "Nonconformist conscience" of the Old group emphasized religious freedom and equality, the pursuit of justice, and opposition to discrimination, compulsion, and coercion. The New Dissenters (and also the Anglican evangelicals) stressed personal morality issues, including sexuality, temperance, family values, and Sabbath-keeping. Both factions were politically active, but until the mid-19th century, the Old group supported mostly Whigs and Liberals in politics, while the New—like most Anglicans—generally supported Conservatives. In the late 19th century, the New Dissenters mostly switched to the Liberal Party. The result was a merging of the two groups, strengthening their great weight as a political pressure group. They joined together on new issues especially regarding schools and temperance, with the latter of special interest to Methodists.[55][56] By 1914 the linkage was weakening and by the 1920s it was virtually dead.[57] Parliament had long imposed a series of political disabilities on Nonconformists outside Scotland. They could not hold most public offices, they had to pay local taxes to the Anglican church, be married by Anglican ministers, and be denied attendance at Oxford or degrees at Cambridge. Dissenters demanded the removal of political and civil disabilities that applied to them (especially those in the Test and Corporation Acts). The Anglican establishment strongly resisted until 1828.[58] Dissenters organized into a political pressure group and succeeded in 1828 in the repeal of some restrictions. It was a major achievement for an outside group, but the Dissenters were not finished and the early Victorian period saw them even more active and successful in eliminating their grievances.[59] Next on the agenda was the matter of church rates, which were local taxes at the parish level for the support of the parish church building in England and Wales. Only buildings of the established church received the tax money. Civil disobedience was attempted but was met with the seizure of personal property and even imprisonment. The compulsory factor was finally abolished in 1868 by William Ewart Gladstone, and payment was made voluntary.[60] While Gladstone was a moralistic evangelical inside the Church of England, he had strong support in the Nonconformist community.[61][62] The Marriage Act 1836 allowed local government registrars to handle marriages. Nonconformist ministers in their chapels were allowed to marry couples if a registrar was present. Also in 1836, civil registration of births, deaths, and marriages was taken from the hands of local parish officials and given to local government registrars. Burial of the dead was a more troubling problem, for urban chapels had no graveyards, and Nonconformists sought to use the traditional graveyards controlled by the established church. The Burial Laws Amendment Act 1880 finally allowed that.[63] Oxford University required students seeking admission to subscribe to the 39 Articles of the Church of England. Cambridge required that for a diploma. The two ancient universities opposed giving a charter to the new University of London in the 1830s because it had no such restriction. The university, nevertheless, was established in 1837, and by the 1850s Oxford dropped its restrictions. In 1871 Gladstone sponsored the Universities Tests Act 1871 that provided full access to degrees and fellowships. Nonconformists (especially Unitarians and Presbyterians) played major roles in founding new universities in the late 19th century at Manchester, as well as Birmingham, Liverpool and Leeds.[64] Agnostics and freethinkers T. H. Huxley's famous debate in 1860 with Samuel Wilberforce was a key moment in the wider acceptance of Charles Darwin's theory of evolution The abstract theological or philosophical doctrine of agnosticism, whereby it is theoretically impossible to prove whether or not God exists, suddenly became a popular issue around 1869, when T. H. Huxley coined the term. It was much discussed for several decades, and had its journal edited by William Stewart Ross (1844–1906) the Agnostic Journal and Eclectic Review. Interest petered out by the 1890s, and when Ross died the Journal soon closed. Ross championed agnosticism in opposition not so much to Christianity, but to atheism, as expounded by Charles Bradlaugh[65] The term "atheism" never became popular. Blasphemy laws meant that promoting atheism could be a crime and was vigorously prosecuted.[66] Charles Southwell was among the editors of an explicitly atheistic periodical, Oracle of Reason, or Philosophy Vindicated, who were imprisoned for blasphemy in the 1840s.[67] Disbelievers call themselves "freethinkers" or "secularists". They included John Stuart Mill, Thomas Carlyle, George Eliot and Matthew Arnold.[68] They were not necessarily hostile to Christianity, as Huxley repeatedly emphasized. The literary figures were caught in something of a trap – their business was writing and their theology said there was nothing for certain to write. They instead concentrated on the argument that it was not necessary to believe in God to behave in moral fashion.[69] The scientists, on the other hand, paid less attention to theology and more attention to the exciting issues raised by Charles Darwin in terms of evolution. The proof of God's existence that said he had to exist to have a marvelously complex world was no longer satisfactory when biology demonstrated that complexity could arise through evolution.[70] Marriage and family Further information: Separate spheres and Women in the Victorian era George William Joy's painting The Bayswater Omnibus, 1895, depicts middle-class social life in this English late Victorian-era scene. A daguerreotype of a Victorian couple, 1840s or 1850s The centrality of the family was a dominant feature for all classes. Worriers repeatedly detected threats that had to be dealt with: working wives, overpaid youths, harsh factory conditions, bad housing, poor sanitation, excessive drinking, and religious decline. The licentiousness so characteristic of the upper class of the late 18th and early 19th centuries dissipated. The home became a refuge from the harsh world; middle-class wives sheltered their husbands from the tedium of domestic affairs. The number of children shrank, allowing much more attention to be paid to each child. Extended families were less common, as the nuclear family became both the ideal and the reality.[71] The emerging middle-class norm for women was separate spheres, whereby women avoid the public sphere – the domain of politics, paid work, commerce, and public speaking. Instead, they should dominate in the realm of domestic life, focused on the care of the family, the husband, the children, the household, religion, and moral behavior.[72] Religiosity was in the female sphere, and the Nonconformist churches offered new roles that women eagerly entered. They taught in Sunday schools, visited the poor and sick, distributed tracts, engaged in fundraising, supported missionaries, led Methodist class meetings, prayed with other women, and a few were allowed to preach to mixed audiences.[73] The long 1854 poem The Angel in the House by Coventry Patmore (1823–1896) exemplified the idealized Victorian woman who is angelically pure and devoted to her family and home. The poem was not a pure invention but reflected the emerging legal economic social, cultural, religious and moral values of the Victorian middle-class. Legally women had limited rights to their bodies, the family property, or their children. The recognized identities were those of daughter, wife, mother, and widow. Rapid growth and prosperity meant that fewer women had to find paid employment, and even when the husband owned a shop or small business, the wife's participation was less necessary. Meanwhile, the home sphere grew dramatically in size; women spent the money and decided on the furniture, clothing, food, schooling, and outward appearance the family would make. Patmore's model was widely copied – by Charles Dickens, for example.[74] Literary critics of the time suggested that superior feminine qualities of delicacy, sensitivity, sympathy, and sharp observation gave women novelists a superior insight into stories about home family and love. This made their work highly attractive to the middle-class women who bought the novels and the serialized versions that appeared in many magazines. However, a few early feminists called for aspirations beyond the home. By the end of the century, the "New Woman" was riding a bicycle, wearing bloomers, signing petitions, supporting worldwide mission activities, and talking about the vote.[75] In Great Britain, elsewhere in Europe, and in the United States, the notion that marriage should be based on romantic love and companionship rather than convenience, money, or other strategic considerations grew in popularity during the Victorian period. Cheaper paper and printing technology made it easier for humans to attract mates this way, hence the birth of the Valentine card.[76] Education and literacy Further information: History of education in England § Nineteenth century, and Public school (United Kingdom) A cartoon from the humorous British magazine Punch about a Senior Wrangler and a student at Girton College from "December 20, 1884" (see upper-right corner). The Industrial Revolution incentivised people to think more scientifically and to become more educated and informed in order to solve novel problems. As a result, cognitive abilities were pushed to their genetic limits, making people more intelligent and innovative than their predecessors.[77][78] Formal education thus became vital. According to intelligence researcher James R. Flynn, these changes echoed down to the twentieth century before leveling off in the early twenty-first.[78] The era saw a reform and renaissance of public schools, inspired by Thomas Arnold at Rugby. The public school became a model for gentlemen and public service.[79] Sunday schools and charity schools helped reduce illiteracy. In fact, throughout the course of the nineteenth century, there was a clear movement towards universal literacy, culminating in the Elementary Education Act of 1870. By 1876, attending elementary schools was made compulsory.[9] As a consequence of various education reforms, literacy rates steadily rose. One way to determine the literacy rate is to count those who could sign their names on their marriage registers. Using this method, it was established that literacy in England and Wales reached roughly 90% by the late nineteenth century. Statistics of literacy from this era are likely underestimates because they were based on the number of people who could write, but throughout most of the nineteenth century, people were typically taught to read before they were taught to write. Literacy rates were higher in urban than rural areas. Rising literacy and urbanization provided an expanding market for printed materials, from cheap books to magazines.[10] A key component of the curriculum at Cambridge since the mid-eighteenth century had been the "Mathematical Tripos," providing not just intensive training for mathematicians and scientists but also general education for future civil servants, colonial administrators, lawyers, and clergymen.[50] Named after the three-legged stool students had been sitting on since the fifteenth century, the Tripos included extremely challenging and highly prestigious exams whose most successful candidate for a given year was called the "Senior Wrangler." Below the Senior and Second Wranglers were the Optimes.[80] The exams concerned not just pure but also "mixed" or applied mathematics. Starting from the 1830s, under the influence of Master of Trinity College William Whewell, the "mixed" portion included only branches of applied mathematics deemed stable, such as mechanics and optics, rather those amenable to mathematical analysis but remained unfinished at the time, such as electricity and magnetism. Following recommendations from the Royal Commission of 1850–51, science education at Oxford and Cambridge underwent significant reforms. In 1851, a new Tripos was introduced, providing a broader and less mathematical program in "natural philosophy," or what science was still commonly called back then.[50] By 1890, the Tripos had evolved into a rigorous test of not just mathematical ingenuity but also mental stamina. Topics ranged widely, from number theory to mathematical physics. Candidates needed to have a firm grasp of the works of Sir Isaac Newton and Euclid of Alexandria, trigonometric identities, conic sections, compounded interest, eclipses and more. They usually sat for five and a half hours each day for eight days for a total of a dozen papers featuring increasingly difficult questions.[80] In general, while the first colleges for women opened in the 1870s, it was not until the 1890s that they started to be permitted to study side-by-side with men and to sit for the same exams as men.[80] The first college for women at the University of Cambridge, Girton, opened in 1873. However, women were only allowed to take exams; it was not until 1948 that they were able to receive degrees.[50] They were marked and scored separately, however, and the results of female candidates were enunciated in comparison to men's, for instance, "between the 20th and 21st Optimes." Exam results from the 1860s onward suggested that women broadly did as well as men, though with the notable exception of mathematics. At that time, it was commonly thought that women were emotional creatures lacking the mental faculty to master mathematics. Thus it was big news when Philippa Fawcett was ranked "above the Senior Wranger" in 1890, scoring thirteen percent higher than the top male that year, Geoffrey Thomas Bennett. She was the first, and last, woman to score the highest on the Tripos.[80] While women were not welcomed in the world of medicine, this was not the case in nursing. In fact, nursing became even more respected after the brilliant exploits of Florence Nightingale during the Crimean War. Her nursing school at St Thomas' Hospital became a model for others. Consequently, for many middle-class young women, the prospects of being a nurse, one of the few career options open to them at the time, became much more appealing.[4] Reading culture See also: Victorian literature and List of 19th-century British children's literature titles Cover illustration for Lewis Carroll's The Nursery "Alice" by E. Gertrude Thomson published by Macmillan in 1890 in London The 1887 edition of Beeton's Christmas Annual contains Arthur Conan Doyle's A Study in Scarlet, the first appearance of the fictional detective Sherlock Holmes. Page 157 from Somerville's Mechanism discussing Kepler's laws During the nineteenth century, the publishing industry found itself catching up with the momentous changes to society brought about by the Industrial Revolution. It benefited from the introduction of electrical power, rail transport, and telegraphy.[10] Sales of books and periodicals were fuelled by the seemingly insatiable demand for knowledge, self-improvement, and entertainment from the rapidly growing middle-class.[11] Initially, while book prices were too high for the average reader, they were sufficient to cover the costs of the publisher and to pay reasonable amounts to the authors. But as free-to-use libraries sprang up all around the country, people started flocking to them. Authors and publishers looked for ways to cut prices and increase sales. Serialisation in periodicals, especially literary magazines though not newspapers, became popular. Quality illustrations were commissioned from the reputable artists of the time as an incentive to purchase. Income from writing increased for some writers, and many became professional novelists.[81] In the early 1800s, the market for children's literature was dominated by religious groups. Stories from this period often included strong a moral message.[9] But it showed signs of growth and some writers decided to seize the opportunity.[82] By the middle of the century, commercial publishers came to recognise the great potential of this market and signed deals with gifted authors to provide a plethora of reading materials to children. They also took advantage of innovations such as those that enable the printing of coloured illustrations. As the middle class boomed, people had more money to spend on entertaining their children. Moral messaging was de-emphasised in favor of fun. Classics like the tales of the Brothers Grimm and the fairy tales of Hans Christian Andersen made their way to the printing press. But it was Alice's Adventures in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll that proved to be the most popular, alongside the works of William Makepeace Thackeray, Charles Kingsley, Jean Ingelow, and George Macdonald. By the 1880s, juvenile fiction packed with action and adventure became commonplace.[9] Fantasy did not have a monopoly on the market for children's literature, however. Tom Brown's School Days (1857) by Thomas Hughes was a noteworthy example of realistic writing and school stories while Black Beauty (1877) by Anna Sewell was the start of the blooming of animal tales. As a matter of fact, the market grew so large that most of the top writers of the era wrote at least one book for children. Children's magazines and poetry for children (especially the nonsensical variety) blossomed during the Victorian age.[83] In prose, the novel rose from a position of relative neglect during the 1830s to become the leading literary genre by the end of the era.[17][84] In the 1830s and 1840s, the social novel (also "Condition-of-England novels") responded to the social, political and economic upheaval associated with industrialisation.[81] Though it remained influential throughout the period, there was a notable resurgence of Gothic fiction in the fin de siècle, such as in Robert Louis Stevenson's novella Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde (1886) and Oscar Wilde's The Picture of Dorian Gray (1891). Following the bicentenary of William Shakespeare in 1769, the popularity of his works steadily grew, reaching a peak in the nineteenth century. Charles and Mary Lamb appeared to have anticipated this with their Tales from Shakespeare (1807). Intended as an introduction for apprentice readers to the works of the great playwright, the book became one of the best-selling titles in literature of the century,[85] being republished multiple times.[82] As early as 1830, astronomer John Herschel had already recognised the need for the genre of popular science. In a letter to philosopher William Whewell, he wrote that the general public needed "digests of what is actually known in each particular branch of science... to give a connected view of what has been done, and what remains to be accomplished."[86] Indeed, as the British population became not just increasingly literate but also well-educated, there was growing demand for science titles. Mary Somerville became an early and highly successful science writer of the nineteenth century. Her On the Connexion of the Physical Sciences (1834), intended for the mass audience, sold quite well.[87][88] Arguably one of the first books in the genre of popular science, it contained few diagrams and very little mathematics. It had ten editions and was translated to multiple languages. As its name suggests, it offered readers a broad overview of the physical sciences at a time when these studies were becoming increasingly distinct and specialised. It was the most popular science title from the publisher John Murray until Charles Darwin's On the Origin of Species (1859).[86] Although Somerville's rendition of Pierre-Simon de Laplace's masterpiece Mécanique Céleste, The Mechanism of the Heavens (1831), was intended to inform the masses of the latest advances in Newtonian mechanics and gravitation, it was also used as a textbook for students at the University of Cambridge till the 1880s.[87][89] The abolition of the newspaper stamp duty in 1855 and the advertising tax in 1858 paved the way for not only cheaper magazines but also those catering to a variety of interests. During the final three decades of the Victorian era, women's newspapers and magazines flourished and increasingly covered topics other than domestic issues, reflecting the trend among women at the time.[11] The professional police force dedicated to not just the prevention but also the investigation of crime took shape during the mid-nineteenth century. This development inspired Charles Dickens to write the crime novel Bleak House (1852–3), creating the first fictional detective, Mr. Bucket, based on a real-life character by the name of Charles Field.[90] But it was Arthur Conan Doyle's Sherlock Holmes who proved to be the most popular fictional detective of the Victorian age, and indeed, of all times.[91] By the 1860s, there was strong demand for adventure, detective, sensational, and science-fiction novels.[81] Indeed, the late nineteenth century saw a tremendous amount of technological progress, which inspired authors to write in the genre of science fiction. Herbert George Wells' The Time Machine (1895) was a commercial success; in it, he introduced the notion of time travel. In some instances, science fiction inspired new technology and scientific research. Explorer Ernest Shackleton acknowledged that the novel Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea by Jules Vernes was an inspiration.[92] A 2015 study investigated the frequency at which difficult vocabulary from the WORDSUM test were employed in about 5.9 million English-language texts published between 1850 and 2005. The researchers found that the more difficult of words were in declining usage and a negative correlation between the use of such words and completed fertility. On the other hand, simpler words entered increasingly common use, an effect of rising literacy.[93][94] In another study, from 2017, researchers employed Google's Ngram Viewer, an enormous archive of scanned books, periodicals, and other printed materials dating back to the sixteenth century. They found that the use of difficult vocabulary increased substantially between the mid-1700s and mid-1800s before declining steadily till the present day.[94] Entertainment Pablo Fanque performing at Astley's Amphitheatre, 1847 Llandudno, 1856. With the arrival of the railway network, seaside towns became popular destinations for Victorian holiday makers The Epsom Derby; painting by James Pollard, c. 1840 Popular forms of entertainment varied by social class. Victorian Britain, like the periods before it, was interested in literature, theatre and the arts (see Aesthetic movement and Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood), and music, drama, and opera were widely attended. Michael Balfe was the most popular British grand opera composer of the period, while the most popular musical theatre was a series of fourteen comic operas by Gilbert and Sullivan, although there was also musical burlesque and the beginning of Edwardian musical comedy in the 1890s. Drama ranged from low comedy to Shakespeare (see Henry Irving). Melodrama—literally 'musical drama'—was introduced in Revolutionary France and reached Great Britain from there during the Victorian era. It was a particularly widespread and influential theatrical genre thanks to its appeal to the working-class and artisans. However, its popularity decline in the late nineteenth century. Even so, it continued to influence the novels of the era.[95] Gentlemen went to dining clubs, like the Beefsteak Club or the Savage Club. Gambling at cards in establishments popularly called casinos was wildly popular during the period: so much so that evangelical and reform movements specifically targeted such establishments in their efforts to stop gambling, drinking, and prostitution.[96] Brass bands and 'The Bandstand' became popular in the Victorian era. The bandstand was a simple construction that not only created an ornamental focal point but also served acoustic requirements whilst providing shelter from the changeable British weather. It was common to hear the sound of a brass band whilst strolling through parklands. At this time musical recording was still very much a novelty.[97] The Victorian era marked the golden age of the British circus.[98] Astley's Amphitheatre in Lambeth, London, featuring equestrian acts in a 42-foot wide circus ring, was the center of the 19th-century circus. The permanent structure sustained three fires but as an institution lasted a full century, with Andrew Ducrow and William Batty managing the theatre in the middle part of the century. William Batty would also build his 14,000-person arena, known commonly as Batty's Hippodrome, in Kensington Gardens, and draw crowds from the Crystal Palace Exhibition. Traveling circuses, like Pablo Fanque's, dominated the British provinces, Scotland, and Ireland (Fanque would enjoy fame again in the 20th century when John Lennon would buy an 1843 poster advertising his circus and adapt the lyrics for The Beatles song, Being for the Benefit of Mr. Kite!). Fanque also stands out as a black man who achieved great success and enjoyed great admiration among the British public only a few decades after Britain had abolished slavery.[99] Edinburgh Ale, 1844 by David Octavius Hill and Robert Adamson. Another form of entertainment involved "spectacles" where paranormal events, such as mesmerism, communication with the dead (by way of mediumship or channeling), ghost conjuring and the like, were carried out to the delight of crowds and participants. Such activities were more popular at this time than in other periods of recent Western history.[100] Natural history became increasingly an "amateur" activity. Particularly in Britain and the United States, this grew into specialist hobbies such as the study of birds, butterflies, seashells (malacology/conchology), beetles and wildflowers. Amateur collectors and natural history entrepreneurs played an important role in building the large natural history collections of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.[101][102] Middle-class Victorians used the train services to visit the seaside, helped by the Bank Holiday Act of 1871, which created many fixed holidays. Large numbers traveling to quiet fishing villages such as Worthing, Morecambe and Scarborough began turning them into major tourist centers, and people like Thomas Cook saw tourism and even overseas travel as viable businesses.[103] Sports Main article: Sport in the United Kingdom § History Rugby football match between England and Scotland, c. 1880 The Victorian era saw the introduction and development of many modern sports.[104] Often originating in the public schools, they exemplified new ideals of manliness.[105] Cricket,[106] cycling, croquet, horse-riding, and many water activities are examples of some of the popular sports in the Victorian era.[107] The modern game of tennis originated in Birmingham, England, between 1859 and 1865. The world's oldest tennis tournament, the Wimbledon championships, was first played in London in 1877. Britain was an active competitor in all the Olympic Games starting in 1896. High culture See also: Victorian architecture, Victorian decorative arts, Victorian fashion, Victorian literature, and Victorian painting A picture of Leadenhall Street, London, c. 1837 The Poultry Cross, Salisbury, painted by Louise Rayner, c. 1870 Gothic Revival architecture became increasingly significant during the period, leading to the Battle of the Styles between Gothic and Classical ideals. Charles Barry's architecture for the new Palace of Westminster, which had been badly damaged in an 1834 fire, was built in the medieval style of Westminster Hall, the surviving part of the building. It constructed a narrative of cultural continuity, set in opposition to the violent disjunctions of Revolutionary France, a comparison common to the period, as expressed in Thomas Carlyle's The French Revolution: A History and Charles Dickens' Great Expectations and A Tale of Two Cities. Gothic was also supported by critic John Ruskin, who argued that it epitomised communal and inclusive social values, as opposed to Classicism, which he considered to epitomise mechanical standardisation.[citation needed] The middle of the 19th century saw The Great Exhibition of 1851, the first World's Fair, which showcased the greatest innovations of the century. At its centre was the Crystal Palace, a modular glass and iron structure – the first of its kind. It was condemned by Ruskin as the very model of mechanical dehumanisation in design but later came to be presented as the prototype of Modern architecture. The emergence of photography, showcased at the Great Exhibition, resulted in significant changes in Victorian art with Queen Victoria being the first British monarch to be photographed. In general, various styles of painting were popular during the Victorian period, Classicism, Neoclassicism, Romanticism, Impressionism, and Post-impressionism. In 1848, Dante Rossetti and William Holman Hunt created the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood whose stated aim was to produce paintings of photographic quality, taking inspiration from a variety of sources, from the works of William Shakespeare to Mother Nature herself.[108] The growing popularity of romantic love spilled over into literature and fine arts.[76] Gallery of selected Victorian paintings The Hireling Shepherd (1851) by William Holman Hunt Monarch of the Glen (1851) by Edwin Landseer Prosperpine (1874) by Dante Rossetti. Miranda (1875) by John William Waterhouse Biondina (1879) by Frederick Leighton A Hopeless Dawn (1888) by Frank Bramley. Titania Sleeping in the Moonlight Protected by Her Fairies by John Simmons, inspired by Shakespeare's A Midsummer Night's Dream. God Speed! (1900) by Edmund Leighton A wounded British officer reading The Times's report of the end of the Crimean War Journalism Main article: History of journalism in the United Kingdom In 1817, Thomas Barnes became general editor of The Times; he was a political radical, a sharp critic of parliamentary hypocrisy and a champion of freedom of the press.[109] Under Barnes and his successor in 1841, John Thadeus Delane, the influence of The Times rose to great heights, especially in politics and in the financial district (the City of London). It spoke of reform.[110] The Times originated the practice of sending war correspondents to cover particular conflicts. W. H. Russell wrote immensely influential dispatches on the Crimean War of 1853–1856; for the first time, the public could read about the reality of warfare. Russell wrote one dispatch that highlighted the surgeons' "inhumane barbarity" and the lack of ambulance care for wounded troops. Shocked and outraged, the public reacted in a backlash that led to major reforms especially in the provision of nursing, led by Florence Nightingale.[111] The Manchester Guardian was founded in Manchester in 1821 by a group of non-conformist businessmen. Its most famous editor, Charles Prestwich Scott, made the Guardian into a world-famous newspaper in the 1890s. The Daily Telegraph in 1856 became the first penny newspaper in London. It was funded by advertising revenue based on a large audience. Leisure Opening of the Royal Albert Hall in 1871 Ramsgate beach in 1899 At mid-century, the idea of a large amphitheatre for musical performances and conferences for the learned captured the imagination of not just Henry Cole, Secretary of the Science and Art Department, but also Prince Albert. By 1857, Cole planned to build one with "due regard to the principles of sound." After the Prince's death in 1861, this project had the additional goal of commemorating him. The Royal Albert Hall opened on 29 March 1871. Lieutenant-Colonel Henry Scott, R.E., who managed the construction, estimated there was enough space for 7,165 people plus 1,200 performers; the theoretical limit was 10,000. As desired by the Prince, it did not rely on public funds but was purely privately funded.[112] Opportunities for leisure activities increased dramatically as real wages continued to grow and hours of work continued to decline. In urban areas the nine-hour workday became increasingly the norm; the Factory Act 1874 limited the working week to 56.5 hours, encouraging the movement towards an eventual eight-hour workday. Furthermore, a system of routine annual holidays came into play, starting with white-collar workers and moving into the working-class.[113][114] Some 200 seaside resorts emerged thanks to cheap hotels and inexpensive railway fares, widespread bank holidays and the fading of many religious prohibitions against secular activities on Sundays.[115] By the late Victorian era the leisure industry had emerged in all cities. It provided scheduled entertainment of suitable length at convenient locales at inexpensive prices. These included sporting events, music halls, and popular theatre. By 1880 football was no longer the preserve of the social elite, as it attracted large working-class audiences. Average attendance was 5000 in 1905, rising to 23,000 in 1913. That amounted to 6 million paying customers with a weekly turnover of £400,000. Sports by 1900 generated some three percent of the total gross national product. Professional sports were the norm, although some new activities reached an upscale amateur audience, such as lawn tennis and golf. Women were now allowed in some sports, such as archery, tennis, badminton and gymnastics.[116] Demographics Demographic transition 1880 London magazine ad links prosperity to temperance. Britain had the lead in rapid economic and population growth. At the time, Thomas Malthus believed this lack of growth outside Britain was due the carrying capacity of their local environments. That is, the tendency of a population to expand geometrically while resources grew more slowly, reaching a crisis (such as famine, war, or epidemic) which would reduce the population to a more sustainable size.[117] Great Britain escaped the 'Malthusian trap' because the scientific and technological breakthroughs of the Industrial Revolution dramatically improved living standards, reducing mortality and increasing longevity.[5] The Victorian era was a time of unprecedented population growth in Britain. The population rose from 13.9 million in 1831 to 32.5 million in 1901. Two major contributory factors were fertility rates and mortality rates. Britain was the first country to undergo the demographic transition and the Agricultural and Industrial Revolutions. Economist Gary Becker argued that at first, falling fertility is due to urbanisation and lower infant mortality rates, which diminished the benefits and increased the costs of raising children. In other words, it became more economically sensible to invest more in fewer children. This is known as the first demographic transition. This trend continued till around 1950. (The second demographic transition occurred due to the significant cultural shifts of the 1960s, leading to the decline in the desire for children.)[118] Fertility rates and mortality rates The demographic transition is when a population shifts from being one of high child mortality rates and high fertility rates to one that is low in both. Western nations completed this transition by the early 1900s. It occurred in two stages. Initially, child mortality rates dropped significantly due to improved healthcare and sanitation and better nutrition, yet fertility rates remained high, leading to a population boom. Gradually, fertility rates fell as people became more affluent and had better access to contraception. By 1900, the infant mortality rate in England was 10%, down from about half in the Middle Ages.[2] There was no catastrophic epidemic or famine in England or Scotland in the nineteenth century—it was the first century in which a major epidemic did not occur throughout the whole country, and deaths per 1000 of population per year in England and Wales fell from 21.9 from 1848 to 1854 to 17 in 1901 (cf, for instance, 5.4 in 1971).[119] Social class had a significant effect on mortality rates: the upper classes had a lower rate of premature death early in the nineteenth century than poorer classes did.[120] In the Victorian era, fertility rates increased in every decade until 1901, when the rates started evening out.[121] There were several reasons for this. One is biological: with improving living standards, a higher proportion of women were biologically able to have children. Another possible explanation is social. In the 19th century, the marriage rate increased, and people were getting married at a very young age until the end of the century, when the average age of marriage started to increase again slowly. The reasons why people got married younger and more frequently are uncertain. One theory is that greater prosperity allowed people to finance marriage and new households earlier than previously possible. With more births within marriage, it seems inevitable that marriage rates and birth rates would rise together. Birth rates were originally measured by the 'crude birth rate' – births per year divided by total population. This is indeed a crude measure, as key groups and their fertility rates are not clear. It is likely to be affected mainly by changes in the age distribution of the population. The Net Reproduction Rate was then introduced as an alternative measure: it measures the average fertility rate of women of child-bearing ages. High rates of birth also occurred because of a lack of birth control. Mainly because women lacked knowledge of birth control methods and the practice was seen as unrespectable.[122] The evening out of fertility rates at the beginning of the 20th century was mainly the result of a few big changes: availability of forms of birth control, and changes in people's attitude towards sex.[123] In the olden days, people typically had had as many children as they could afford in order to ensure at least a few of them would survive to adulthood and have children of their own due to high child mortality rates. Moreover, it was the poor who had had an incentive to curb their fertility whereas the rich had lacked such a need due to greater wealth and lower child mortality rates. This changed due to the Industrial Revolution. Standards of living improved and mortality rates fell. People no longer needed to have as many children as before to ensure the propagation of their genes. The link between poverty and child mortality weakened. In addition, societal attitude towards contraception warmed, leading to the negative correlation between intelligence and fertility.[2][77] Factors linked to general intelligence, such as socioeconomic status and educational attainment, were also found to be negatively correlated with fertility starting from the nineteenth century.[124] Environmental and health standards rose throughout the Victorian era. Improvements in nutrition may also have played a role, though its importance is still debated.[119] Economy, industry, and trade Further information: Industrial revolution and Second industrial revolution Progress The most obvious and the most distinctive feature of the History of Civilisation, during the last fifty years [1837–87], is the wonderful increase of industrial production by the application of machinery, the improvement of old technical processes and the invention of new ones, accompanied by an even more remarkable development of old and new means of locomotion and intercommunication. —Thomas Henry Huxley[125] Life in the late 1700s had been little different from life in the late Middle Ages. But the nineteenth century saw dramatic technological development. Someone alive in 1804 would know about the electric telegraph, the steam ship, the circular saw, the bicycle, and the steam-powered locomotive. If this person lived to 1870, he or she would have heard of the invention of the electric light bulb, the typewriter, the calculator, the rubber tyre, the washing machine, the internal combustion engine, plastic, and dynamite.[2] Engineering prowess, especially in communication and transportation, made Great Britain the leading industrial powerhouse and trading nation of the world at that time.[3] Schematic diagram of the Kondratiev wave Historians have characterised the mid-Victorian era (1850–1870) as Britain's "Golden Years".[126][127] It was not till the two to three decades following the Second World War that substantial economic growth was seen again. In the long-term view, the mid-Victorian boom was one upswing in the Kondratiev cycle (see figure).[127] There was prosperity, as the national income per person grew by half. Much of the prosperity was due to the increasing industrialisation, especially in textiles and machinery, as well as to the worldwide network of exports that produced profits for British merchants. British entrepreneurs built railways in India and many independent nations. There was peace abroad (apart from the short Crimean War, 1854–56), and social peace at home. Opposition to the new order melted away, says Porter. The Chartist movement peaked as a democratic movement among the working class in 1848; its leaders moved to other pursuits, such as trade unions and cooperative societies. The working class ignored foreign agitators like Karl Marx in their midst, and joined in celebrating the new prosperity. Employers typically were paternalistic and generally recognised the trade unions.[128] Companies provided their employees with welfare services ranging from housing, schools and churches, to libraries, baths, and gymnasia. Middle-class reformers did their best to assist the working classes' aspirations to middle-class norms of "respectability". There was a spirit of libertarianism, says Porter, as people felt they were free. Taxes were very low, and government restrictions were minimal. There were still problem areas, such as occasional riots, especially those motivated by anti-Catholicism. Society was still ruled by the aristocracy and the gentry, who controlled high government offices, both houses of Parliament, the church, and the military. Becoming a rich businessman was not as prestigious as inheriting a title and owning a landed estate. Literature was doing well, but the fine arts languished as the Great Exhibition of 1851 showcased Britain's industrial prowess rather than its sculpture, painting or music. The educational system was mediocre; the main universities (outside Scotland) were likewise mediocre.[129] Historian Llewellyn Woodward has concluded:[130] For leisure or work, for getting or for spending, England was a better country in 1879 than in 1815. The scales were less weighted against the weak, against women and children, and against the poor. There was greater movement, and less of the fatalism of an earlier age. The public conscience was more instructed, and the content of liberty was being widened to include something more than freedom from political constraint ... Yet England in 1871 was by no means an earthly paradise. The housing and conditions of life of the working class in town & country were still a disgrace to an age of plenty. In December 1844, Rochdale Society of Equitable Pioneers founded what is considered the first cooperative in the world. The founding members were a group of 28, around half of which were weavers, who decided to band together to open a store owned and managed democratically by the members, selling food items they could not otherwise afford. Ten years later, the British co-operative movement had grown to nearly 1,000 co-operatives. The movement also spread across the world, with the first cooperative financial institution founded in 1850 in Germany. From Street Life in London, 1877, by John Thomson and Adolphe Smith. "...the inhabitants of Church Lane were nearly all what I may term “street folks” – living, buying, selling, transacting all their business in the open street. It was a celebrated resort for tramps and costers of every description." A street stall in London during the 1870s Many European companies, such as steam-machine producer J. Kemna, modeled themselves on English industry. Housing Part of Charles Booth's poverty map showing the Old Nichol, a slum in the East End of London. Published 1889 in Life and Labour of the People in London. The red areas are "middle class, well-to-do", light blue areas are "poor, 18s to 21s a week for a moderate family", dark blue areas are "very poor, casual, chronic want", and black areas are the "lowest class...occasional labourers, street sellers, loafers, criminals and semi-criminals". Working class life in Victorian Wetherby, West Yorkshire Girl pulling a coal tub in mine. From official report of the parliamentary commission in the mid-19th century.[131] The very rapid growth in population in the 19th century in the cities included the new industrial and manufacturing cities, as well as service centres such as Edinburgh and London. The critical factor was financing, which was handled by building societies that dealt directly with large contracting firms.[132][133] Private renting from housing landlords was the dominant tenure. P. Kemp says this was usually of advantage to tenants.[134] People moved in so rapidly that there was not enough capital to build adequate housing for everyone, so low income newcomers squeezed into increasingly overcrowded slums. Clean water, sanitation, and public health facilities were inadequate; the death rate was high, especially infant mortality, and tuberculosis among young adults. Cholera from polluted water and typhoid were endemic. Unlike rural areas, there were no famines such as the one which devastated Ireland in the 1840s.[135][136][137] Poverty 19th-century Britain saw a huge population increase accompanied by rapid urbanisation stimulated by the Industrial Revolution. Wage rates improved steadily; real wages (after taking inflation into account) were 65 percent higher in 1901, compared to 1871. Much of the money was saved, as the number of depositors in savings banks rose from 430,000 in 1831, to 5.2 million in 1887, and their deposits from £14 million to over £90 million.[138] People flooded into industrial areas and commercial cities faster than housing could be built, resulting in overcrowding and lagging sanitation facilities such as fresh water and sewage. These problems were magnified in London, where the population grew at record rates. Large houses were turned into flats and tenements, and as landlords failed to maintain these dwellings, slum housing developed. Kellow Chesney described the situation as follows: "Hideous slums, some of them acres wide, some no more than crannies of obscure misery, make up a substantial part of the metropolis... In big, once handsome houses, thirty or more people of all ages may inhabit a single room."[139] Significant changes happened in the British Poor Law system in England and Wales, Scotland, and Ireland. These included a large expansion in workhouses (or poorhouses in Scotland), although with changing populations during the era. Child labour The early Victorian era before the reforms of the 1840s became notorious for the employment of young children in factories and mines and as chimney sweeps.[140][141] Child labour played an important role in the Industrial Revolution from its outset: novelist Charles Dickens, for example, worked at the age of 12 in a blacking factory, with his family in a debtors' prison. Reformers wanted the children in school: in 1840 only about 20 percent of the children in London had any schooling. By 1860 about half of the children between 5 and 15 were in school (including Sunday school).[142] The children of the poor were expected to help towards the family budget, often working long hours in dangerous jobs for low wages.[139] Agile boys were employed by the chimney sweeps; small children were employed to scramble under machinery to retrieve cotton bobbins; and children were also employed to work in coal mines, crawling through tunnels too narrow and low for adults. Children also worked as errand boys, crossing sweepers, shoe blacks, or sold matches, flowers, and other cheap goods.[139] Some children undertook work as apprentices to respectable trades, such as building, or as domestic servants (there were over 120,000 domestic servants in London in the mid 19th century). Working hours were long: builders might work 64 hours a week in summer and 52 in winter, while domestic servants were theoretically on duty 80-hours a week. Mother bides at home, she is troubled with bad breath, and is sair weak in her body from early labour. I am wrought with sister and brother, it is very sore work; cannot say how many rakes or journeys I make from pit's bottom to wall face and back, thinks about 30 or 25 on the average; the distance varies from 100 to 250 fathom. I carry about 1 cwt. and a quarter on my back; have to stoop much and creep through water, which is frequently up to the calves of my legs. — Isabella Read, 12 years old, coal-bearer, testimony gathered by Ashley's Mines Commission 1842[131] As early as 1802 and 1819, Factory Acts were passed to limit the working hours of children in factories and cotton mills to 12 hours per day. These acts were largely ineffective and after radical agitation, by for example the "Short Time Committees" in 1831, a Royal Commission recommended in 1833 that children aged 11–18 should work a maximum of 12 hours per day, children aged 9–11 a maximum of eight hours, and children under the age of nine should no longer be permitted to work. This act, however, only applied to the textile industry, and further agitation led to another act in 1847 limiting both adults and children to 10-hour working days.[142] Mathematics, science, technology, and engineering Professionalisation of science Painting of the Royal Institution by Thomas Hosmer Shepherd circa 1838. Founded in 1799 with the stated purpose of "diffusing the Knowledge, and facilitating the general Introduction, of Useful Mechanical Inventions and Improvements; and for teaching, by Courses of Philosophical Lectures and Experiments, the application of Science to the common Purposes of Life," the Royal Institution was a proper scientific institution with laboratories, a lecture hall, libraries, and offices. In its first years, the Institution was dedicated to the improvement of agriculture using chemistry, prompted by trade restrictions with Europe. Such practical concerns continued through the next two centuries. However, it soon became apparent that additional funding was required in order for the Institution to continue. Some well-known experts were hired as lecturers and researchers. The most successful of them all was Sir Humphry Davy, whose lectures concerned a myriad of topics and were so popular that the original practical purpose of the Institution faded away. It became increasingly dominated by research in basic science.[143] The professionalisation of science began in the aftermath of the French Revolution and soon spread to other parts of the Continent, including the German lands. It was slow to reach Britain, however. Master of Trinity College William Whewell coined the term scientist in 1833 to describe the new professional breed specialists and experts studying what was still commonly known as natural philosophy.[50] In 1840, Whewell wrote, "We need very much a name to describe a cultivator of science in general. I should incline to call him a Scientist." The new term signaled the recognition of the importance of empiricism and inductive reasoning.[144] But this term was slow to catch on. As biologist Thomas Huxley indicated in 1852, the prospect of earning a decent living as a scientist remained remote despite the prestige of the occupation. It was possible for a scientist to "earn praise but not pudding," he wrote. Since its birth, the Royal Society of London had been a club of gentlemanly amateurs, though some of whom were the very best in their fields, people like Charles Darwin and James Prescott Joule. But the Society reformed itself in the 1830s and 1840s. By 1847, it only admitted the new breed of professionals.[50] The Victorians were impressed by science and progress and felt that they could improve society in the same way as they were improving technology. Britain was the leading world centre for advanced engineering and technology. Its engineering firms were in worldwide demand for designing and constructing railways.[145][146] Ease of discovery and rate of progress A necessary part of understanding scientific progress is the ease of scientific discovery. In many cases, from planetary science to mammalian biology, the ease of discovery since the 1700s and 1800s can be fitted to an exponentially decaying curve. But the rate of progress is also dependent on other factors, such as the number of researchers, the level of funding, and advances in technology. Thus the number of new species of mammals discovered between the late 1700s and late 1800s followed grew exponentially before leveling off in the 1900s; the general shape is known as the logistic curve. In other cases, a branch of study reached the point of saturation. For instance, the last major internal human organ, the paraythyroid gland, was discovered in 1880 by Ivar Viktor Sandström.[147] This does not mean that basic science was coming an end. Despite the despondency of many Victorian-era scientists, who thought that all that remained was measuring quantities to the next decimal place and that new discoveries would not change the contemporary scientific paradigm, as the nineteenth century became the twentieth, science witnessed truly revolutionary discoveries, such as radioactivity, and basic science continued its advance, though a number of twentieth-century scientists shared the same pessimism as their late-Victorian counterparts.[148] Mathematics and statistics Nightingale's mortality charts from the Crimean War In the field of statistics, the nineteenth century saw significant innovations in data visualisation. William Playfair, who created charts of all sorts, justified it thus, "a man who has carefully investigated a printed table, finds, when done, that he has only a very faint and partial idea of what he has read; and that like a figure imprinted on sand, is soon totally erased and defaced." For example, in a chart showing the relationship between population and government revenue of some European nations, he used the areas of circles to represent the geographical sizes of those nations. In the same graph he used the slopes of lines to indicate the tax burden of a given population. While serving as nurse during the Crimean War, Florence Nightingale drew the first pie charts representing the monthly fatality rates of the conflict, distinguishing deaths due to battle wounds (innermost section), those due to infectious disease (outer section), and to other causes (middle section). (See figure.) Her charts clearly showed that most deaths resulted from disease, which led the general public to demand improved sanitation at field hospitals. Although bar charts representing frequencies were first used by the Frenchman A. M. Guerry in 1833, it was the statistician Karl Pearson who gave them the name histograms. Pearson used them in an 1895 article mathematically analyzing biological evolution. One such histogram showed that buttercups with large numbers of petals were rarer.[149] Normal distributions, expressible in the form y = A e − k x 2 {\displaystyle y=Ae^{-kx^{2}}} , arose in various works on probability and the theory of errors. Belgian sociologist and statistician Adolphe Quetelet discovered that its extremely wide applicability in his analysis of vast amounts of statistics of human physical characteristics such as height and other traits such as criminality and alcoholism. Queletet derived the concept of the "average man" from his studies. Sir Francis Galton employed Quetelet's ideas in his research on mathematical biology. In his experiments with sweet peas in the 1870s, Galton discovered that the spread of the distributions of a particular trait did not change over the generations. He invented what he called the "quincunx" to demonstrate why mixtures of normal distributions were normal. Galton noticed that the means of a particular trait in the offspring generation differed from those of the parent generation, a phenomenon now known as regression to the mean. He found that the slopes of the regression lines of two given variables were the same if the two data sets were scaled by units of probable error and introduced the notion of the correlation coefficient, but noted that correlation does not imply causation.[149] During the late nineteenth century, British statisticians introduced a number of methods to relate and draw conclusions from statistical quantities. Francis Edgeworth developed a test for statistical significance that estimated the "fluctuations"—twice the variance in modern language—from two given means. By modern standards, however, he was extremely conservative when it comes to drawing conclusions about the significance of an observation. For Edgeworth, an observation was significant if it was at the level of 0.005, which is much stricter than the requirement of 0.05 to 0.01 commonly used today. Pearson defined the standard deviation and introduced the χ 2 {\displaystyle \chi ^{2}} -statistic (chi-squared). Pearson's student, George Udney Yule, demonstrated that one could compute the regression equation of a given data set using the method of least squares.[149] In 1828, miller and autodidactic mathematician George Green published An Essay on the Application of Mathematical Analysis to the Theories of Electricity and Magnetism, making use of the mathematics of potential theory developed by Continental mathematicians. But this paper fell on deaf ears until William Thomson read it, realised its significance, and had it re-printed in 1850. Green's work became a source of inspiration for the Cambridge school of mathematical physicists, which included Thomson himself, George Gabriel Stokes, and James Clerk Maxwell. Green's Essay contained what became known as Green's theorem, a basic result in vector calculus, Green's identities, and the notion of Green's functions, which appears in the study of differential equations.[150][151] Thomson went on to prove Stokes' theorem, which earned that name after Stokes asked students to prove in the Smith's Prize exam in 1854. Stokes learned it from Thomson in a letter in 1850. Stokes' theorem generalises Green's theorem, which itself is a higher-dimensional version of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.[151][152] Research in physics—in particular elasticity, heat conduction, hydrodynamics, and electromagnetism—motivated the development of vector calculus in the nineteenth century.[150][152] Arthur Cayley is credited with the creation of the theory of matrices—rectangular arrays of numbers—as distinct objects from determinants, studied since the mid-eighteenth century. The term matrix was coined by James Joseph Sylvester, a major contributor to the theory of determinants. It is difficult to overestimate the value of matrix theory to modern theoretical physics. Peter Tait wrote, prophetically, that Cayley was "forging the weapons for future generations of physicists."[153] Theoretical mechanics and optics Unsolved problem in physics: Under what conditions do solutions to the Navier–Stokes equations exist and are smooth? This is a Millennium Prize Problem in mathematics. (more unsolved problems in physics) Early contributions study of elasticity—how objects behave under stresses, pressures, and loads— employed ad hoc hypotheses to solve specific problems. It was during the nineteenth century that scientists began to work out a thorough theory. In 1821, using an analogy with elastic bodies, French professor of mechanics Claude-Louis Navier arrived at the basic equations of motion for viscous fluids. George Gabriel Stokes re-derived them in 1845 using continuum mechanics in a paper titled "On the Theories of Internal Friction of Fluids in Motion." In it, Stokes sought to develop a mathematical description for all known fluids that take into account viscosity, or internal friction. These are now referred to as the Navier–Stokes equations.[154] In 1852, Stokes showed that light polarisation can be described in terms of what are now known as the Stokes parameters. The Stokes parameters for a given wave may be viewed as a vector.[155] Founded in the eighteenth century, the calculus of variations grew into a much favored mathematical tool among physicists. Scientific problems thus became the impetus for the development of the subject. William Rowan Hamilton advanced it in his course to construct a deductive framework for optics; he then applied the same ideas to mechanics.[156] With an appropriate variational principle, one could deduce the equations of motion for a given mechanical or optical system. Soon, scientists worked out the variational principles for the theory of elasticity, electromagnetism, and fluid mechanics (and, in the future, relativity and quantum theory). Whilst variational principles did not necessarily provide a simpler way to solve problems, they were of interest for philosophical or aesthetic reasons, though scientists at this time were not as motivated by religion in their work as their predecessors.[156] Hamilton's work in physics was great achievement; he was able to provide a unifying mathematical framework for wave propagation and particle motion.[157] In light of this description, it becomes clear why the wave and corpuscle theories of light were equally able to account for the phenomena of reflection and refraction.[158] Hamilton's equations also proved useful in calculating planetary orbits.[157] In 1845, John James Waterson submitted to the Royal Society a paper on the kinetic theory of gases that included a statement of the equipartition theorem and a calculation of the ratio of the specific heats of gases. Although the paper was read before the Society and its abstract published, Waterson's paper faced antipathy. At this time, the kinetic theory of gases was considered highly speculative as it was based on the then not-accepted atomic hypothesis.[159] But by the mid-1850s, interest was revived. In the 1860s, James Clerk Maxwell published a series of papers on the subject. Unlike those of his predecessors, who were only using averages, Maxwell's papers were explicitly statistical in nature. He proposed that the speeds of molecules in a gas followed a distribution. Although the speeds would cluster around the average, some molecules were moving faster or slower than this average. He showed that this distribution is a function of temperature and mathematically described various properties of gases, such as diffusion and viscosity. He predicted, surprisingly, that the viscosity of a gas is independent of its density. This was verified at once by a series of experiments Maxwell conducted with his wife, Katherine. Experimental verification of the Maxwell distribution was not obtained till 60 years later, however. In the meantime, the Austrian Ludwig Boltzmann developed Maxwell's statistics further and proved, in 1872, using the " H {\displaystyle H} -function," that the Maxwellian distribution is stable and any non-Maxwellian distribution would morph into it.[160] In his Dynamics of Rigid Bodies (1877), Edward John Routh noted the importance of what he called "absent coordinates," also known as cyclic coordinates or ignorable coordinates (following the terminology of E. T. Whittaker). Such coordinates are associated with conserved momenta and as such are useful in problem solving.[161] Routh also devised a new method for solving problems in mechanics. Although Routh's procedure does not add any new insights, it allows for more systematic and convenient analysis, especially in problems with many degrees of freedom and at least some cyclic coordinates.[162][163] In 1899, at the request the British Association for the Advancement of Science from the year before, Edmund Taylor Whittaker submitted his Report on the Progress of Solution to the Problem of Three Bodies. At that time, classical mechanics in general and the three-body problem in particular captured the imagination of many talented mathematicians, whose contributions Whittaker covered in his Report. Whittaker later incorporated the Report into his textbook titled Analytical Dynamics of Particles and Rigid Bodies (first edition 1907). It helped provide the scientific basis for the aerospace industry in the twentieth century. Despite its age, it remains in print in the early twenty-first century.[164] Thermodynamics, heat engines, and refrigerators William Thomson, knighted by Queen Victoria in 1866 and elevated to Lord Kelvin of Largs in 1892, was one of the top physicists of his day. During the 1830s and 1840s, traditional caloric theory of heat began losing favour to "dynamical" alternatives, which posit that heat is a kind of motion. Brewer and amateur scientist James Prescott Joule was one of the proponents of the latter. Joule's intricate experiments—the most successful of which involved heating water with paddle wheels—making full use of his skill in temperature control as a brewer, demonstrated decisively the reality of the "mechanical equivalent of heat." What would later become known as the "conservation of energy" was pursued by many other workers approaching the subject from a variety of backgrounds, from medicine and physiology to physics and engineering. Another notable contributor to this development was the German researcher Hermann von Helmholtz, who gave an essentially Newtonian, that is, mechanical, account. William Thomson (later Lord Kelvin) received the works of Joule and Helmholtz positively, embracing them as providing support for the emerging "science of energy."[159] In the late 1840s to the 1850s, Kelvin, his friend William John Macquorn Rankine, and the German Rudolf Clausius published a steady stream of papers concerning heat engines and an absolute temperature scale. Indeed, the commercial value of new science had already become apparent by this time; some businessmen were quite willing to offer generous financial support for researchers. Rankine spoke confidently of the new science of thermodynamics, a term Kelvin coined in 1854, whose fundamental principles came to be known as the First and Second Laws and whose core concepts were "energy" and "entropy."[50] Kelvin and Peter Guthrie Tait's Treatise on Natural Philosophy (1867) was an attempt to reformulate physics in terms of energy. Here, Kelvin and Tait introduced the phrase kinetic energy (instead of 'actual'), now in standard usage. The phrase potential energy was promoted by Rankine.[50] On the practical side, the food-preserving effect of low temperatures had long been recognised. Natural ice was vigorously traded in the early nineteenth century, but it was inevitably in short supply, especially in Australia. During the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, there was considerable commercial incentive to develop ever more effective refrigerators thanks to the expansion of agriculture in the Americas, Australia, and New Zealand and rapid urbanization in Western Europe. From the 1830s onward, refrigerators relied on the expansion of compressed air or the evaporation of a volatile liquid; evaporation became the basis of all modern refrigerator designs. Long-distance shipping of perishable foods, such as meat, boomed in the late 1800s.[165] On the theoretical side, new refrigeration techniques were also of great value. From his absolute temperature scale, Lord Kelvin deduced the existence of absolute zero occurring at −273.15°C. Scientists began trying to reach ever lower temperatures and to liquefy every gas they encountered. This paved the way for the development of low-temperature physics and the Third Law of Thermodynamics.[165] Natural history This study of natural history was most powerfully advanced by Charles Darwin and his theory of evolution first published in his book On the Origin of Species in 1859. Research in geology and evolutionary biology naturally led to the question of how old the Earth was. Indeed, between the mid-1700s to the mid-1800s, this was the topic of increasingly sophisticated intellectual discussions. With the advent of thermodynamics, it became clear that the Earth and the Sun must have an old but finite age. Whatever the energy source of the Sun, it must be finite, and since it is constantly dissipating, there must be a day when the Sun runs out of energy. Lord Kelvin wrote in 1852, "...within a finite period of time past the earth must have been, and within a finite period of time to come the earth must again be, unfit for the habitation of man as at present constituted, unless operations have been, or are to be performed, which are impossible under the laws to which the known operations going on are subject." In the 1860s, Kelvin employed a mathematical model by von Helmholtz suggesting that the energy of the Sun is released via gravitational collapse to calculate the age of the Sun to be between 50 and 500 million years. He reached comparable figures for the Earth. The missing ingredient here was radioactivity, which was not known to science till the end of the nineteenth century.[50] Electricity, magnetism, and electrification Michael Faraday delivering a Christmas Lecture at the Royal Institution After the Dane Hans Christian Orsted demonstrated that it was possible to deflect a magnetic needle by closing or opening an electric circuit nearby, a deluge of papers attempting explain the phenomenon was published. Michael Faraday set himself to the task of clarifying the nature of electricity and magnetism by experiments. In doing so, he devised what could be described as the first electric motor (though it does not resemble a modern one), a transformer (now used to step up the voltage and step down the current or vice versa), and a dynamo (which contains the basics of all electric turbine generators).[166] The practical value of Faraday's research on electricity and magnetism was nothing short of revolutionary. A dynamo converts mechanical energy into an electrical current whilst a motor does the reverse. The world's first power plants entered service in 1883, and by the following year, people realized the possibility of using electricity to power a variety of household appliances. Inventors and engineers soon raced to develop such items, starting with affordable and durable incandescent light bulbs, perhaps the most important of the early applications of electricity.[166] As the foremost expert on electricity and magnetism at the time, Lord Kelvin oversaw the laying of the trans-Atlantic telegraphic cable, which became successful in 1866.[50] Drawing on the work of his predecessors, especially the experimental research of Michael Faraday, the analogy with heat flow by Lord Kelvin, and the mathematical analysis of George Green, James Clerk Maxwell synthesized all that was known about electricity and magnetism into a single mathematical framework, Maxwell's equations.[167] Maxwell used his equations to predict the existence of electromagnetic waves, which travel at the speed of light. In other words, light is but one kind of electromagnetic wave. Maxwell's theory predicted there ought to be other types, with different frequencies. After some ingenious experiments, Maxwell's prediction was confirmed by German physicist Heinrich Hertz. In the process, Hertz generated and detected what are now called radio waves and built crude radio antennas and the predecessors of satellite dishes.[168] Dutch physicist Hendrik Lorentz derived, using suitable boundary conditions, Fresnel's equations for the reflection and transmission of light in different media from Maxwell's equations. He also showed that Maxwell's theory succeeded in illuminating the phenomenon of light dispersion where other models failed. John William Strutt (Lord Rayleigh) and the American Josiah Willard Gibbs then proved that the optical equations derived from Maxwell's theory are the only self-consistent description of the reflection, refraction, and dispersion of light consistent with experimental results. Optics thus found a new foundation in electromagnetism.[167] But it was Oliver Heaviside, an enthusiastic supporter of Maxwell's electromagnetic theory, who deserves most of the credit for shaping how people understood and applied Maxwell's work for decades to come.[169] Maxwell originally wrote down a grand total of 20 equations for the electromagnetic field, which he later reduced to eight. Heaviside rewrote them in the form commonly used today, just four expressions. In addition, Heaviside was responsible for considerable progress in electrical telegraphy, telephony, and the study of the propagation of electromagnetic waves. Independent of Gibbs, Heaviside assembled a set of mathematical tools known as vector calculus to replace the quaternions, which were in vogue at the time but which Heaviside dismissed as "antiphysical and unnatural."[169] Faraday also investigated how electrical currents affected chemical solutions. His experiments led him to the two laws of electrochemistry. Together with Whewell, Faraday introduced the basic vocabulary for the subject, the words electrode, anode, cathode, electrolysis, electrolyte, ion, anion, and cation. They remain in standard usage. But Faraday's work was of value to more then just chemists. In his Faraday Memorial Lecture in 1881, the German Hermann von Helmholtz asserted that Faraday's laws of electrochemistry hinted at the atomic structure of matter. If the chemical elements were distinguishable from one another by simple ratios of mass, and if the same amounts of electricity deposited amounts of these elements upon the poles in ratios, then electricity must also come in as discrete units, later named electrons.[166] In the late nineteenth century, the nature of the energy emitted by the discharge between high-voltage electrodes inside an evacuated tube—cathode rays—attracted the attention of many physicists. While the Germans thought cathode rays were waves, the British and the French believed they were particles. Working at the Cavendish Laboratory, established by Maxwell, J. J. Thompson directed a dedicate experiment demonstrating that cathode rays were in fact negatively charged particles, now called electrons. The experiment enabled Thompson to calculate the ratio between the magnitude of the charge and the mass of the particle ( q / m {\displaystyle q/m} ). In addition, because the ratio was the same regardless of the metal used, Thompson concluded that electrons must be a constituent of all atoms. Although the atoms of each chemical elements have different numbers of electrons, all electrons are identical.[170] Computer science and logic Inspired by the explorations in abstract algebra of George Peacock and Augustus de Morgan, George Boole published a book titled An Investigation of the Laws of Thought (1854), in which he brought the study of logic from philosophy and metaphysics to mathematics. His stated goal was to "investigate the fundamental laws of those operations of the mind by which reasoning is performed; to give expression to them in the symbolical language of a Calculus, and upon this foundation to establish the science of logical and construct its methods." Although ignored at first, Boolean algebra, as it is now known, became central to the design of circuits and computers in the following century.[171] The desire to construct calculating machines is not new. In fact, it can be traced all the way back to the Hellenistic Civilization. While people have devised such machines over the centuries, mathematicians continued to perform calculations by hand, as machines offered little advantage in speed. For complicated calculations, they employed tables, especially of logarithmic and trigonometric functions, which were computed by hand. But right in the middle of the Industrial Revolution in England, Charles Babbage thought of using the all-important steam engine to power a mechanical computer, the Difference Engine. Unfortunately, whilst Babbage managed to secure government funds for the construction of the machine, the government subsequently lost and interest and Babbage faced considerable troubles developing the necessary machine components. He abandoned the project to pursue a new one, his Analytical Engine. By 1838, he had worked out the basic design. Like a modern computer, it consisted of two basic parts, one that stores the numbers to be processed (the store), and one that performed the operations (the mill). Babbage adopted the concept of punch cards from the French engineer Joseph Jacquard, who had used it to automate the textile industry in France, to control the operations of his Analytical Engine. Unfortunately, he again lacked the financial resources to build it, and so it remained a theoretical construct. But he did leave behind detailed notes and engineering drawings, from which modern experts conclude that the technology of the time was advanced enough to actually build it, even if he never had enough money to do so.[172] In 1840, Babbage went to Turin to give lectures on his work designing the Analytical Engine to Italian scientists. Ada Lovelace translated the notes published by one of the attendees into English and heavily annotated it. She wrote down the very first computer program, in her case one for computing the Bernoulli numbers. She employed what modern computer programmers would recognise as loops and decision steps, and gave a detailed diagram, possibly the first flowchart ever created.[172] She noted that a calculating machine could perform not just arithmetic operations but also symbolic manipulations. On the limitations and implications of the computer, she wrote,[172] ...the Analytical Engine has no pretensions whatever to originate anything. It can do whatever we know how to order it to perform. It can follow analysis; but it has no power of anticipating any analytical relations or truths. Its province is to assist us in making available what we are already acquainted with... But it is likely to exert an indirect and reciprocal influence on science itself in another manner. For, in so distributing and combining the truths and the formulas of analysis, that they may become most easily and rapidly amendable to the mechanical combinations of the engine, the relations and the nature of many subjects in that science are necessarily thrown into new lights, and more profoundly investigated... It is however pretty evident, on general principles, that in devising for mathematical truths a new form in which to record and throw themselves out for actual use, views are likely to be induced, which should again react on the more theoretical phase of the subject. Communication and transportation Steam ships The SS Great Britain is now a museum ship in Bristol. Steam ships were one of the keys to Britain's prosperity in the nineteenth century. This technology, which predates the Victorian era, had a long a rich history. Starting in the late 1700s, people had begun building steam-powered ships with ever increasing size, operational range, and speed, first to cross the English Channel and then the Atlantic and finally to reach places as far away as India and Australia without having to refuel mid-route. International trade and travel boosted demand, and there was intense competition among the shipping companies.[3] Steam ships such as the SS Great Britain and SS Great Western made international travel more common but also advanced trade, so that in Britain it was not just the luxury goods of earlier times that were imported into the country but essentials and raw materials such as corn and cotton from the United States and meat and wool from Australia. At 693 feet long, 120 feet wide and weighing over 18,900 tons, the SS Great Eastern was the largest ship built at the time, capable of transporting 4,000 passengers from Britain to Australia without having to refuel along the way. Even when she was finally broken up for scraps in 1888, she was still the largest ship in the world. Her record was not broken till the Edwardian era with super liners like the Lusitania in 1907, the Titanic in 1912. Yet despite being a remarkable feat of engineering, the Great Eastern became more and more of a white elephant as smaller and faster ships were in greater demand. Nevertheless, she gained a new lease of life when she was chartered to lay telegraphic cables across the Atlantic, and then to India. Her size and range made her ideally suited for the task.[3] The British government had long realised that national prosperity depended on trade. For that reason, it deployed the Royal Navy to protect maritime trade routes and financed the construction of many steam ships.[3] Telegraphy, telephony, the wireless, and photography The Louth-London Royal Mail Travelling by Train from Peterborough East, Northamptonshire (1845) by James Pollard. The British Empire's submarine telegraphic cable network eventually connected all of its major possessions. Although the idea of transmitting messages via electrical signals dated back to the eighteenth century, it was not until the 1820s that advances in the study of electricity and magnetism made that a practical reality. In 1837, William Fothergill Cooke and Charles Wheatstone invented a telegraphic system that used electrical currents to deflect magnetic needles, thus transmitting coded messages. This design soon made its way all across Britain, appearing in every town and post office. By the mid-1800s, a telegraphic cable was laid across the English Channel, the Irish Sea, and the North Sea. In 1866, the SS Great Eastern successfully laid the transatlantic telegraphic cable. A global network boomed towards the end of the century.[3] In 1876, Alexander Graham Bell patented the telephone. Like the telegraph, the telephone enabled rapid personal communication. A little over a decade later, 26,000 telephones were in service in Britain (and 150,000 in America) had telephones. Multiple switchboards were installed in every major town and city.[3] Hertz's experimental work in electromagnetism stimulated interest in the possibility of wireless communication, which did not require long and expensive cables and was faster than even the telegraph. Receiving little support in his native Italy, Guglielmo Marconi moved to England and adapted Hertz's equipment for this purpose in the 1890s. He achieved the first international wireless transmission between England and France in 1900 and by the following year, he succeeded in sending messages in Morse code across the Atlantic. Seeing its value, the shipping industry adopted this technology at once. Radio broadcasting became extremely popular in the twentieth century and remains in common use in the early twenty-first.[168] In fact, the global communications network of the twenty-first century has its roots in the Victorian era.[3] Photography was realised in 1839 by Louis Daguerre in France and William Fox Talbot in Britain. By 1889, hand-held cameras were available.[173] Another important innovation in communications was the Penny Black, the first postage stamp, which standardised postage to a flat price regardless of distance sent. Railways Brunel's Clifton Suspension Bridge in Bristol The railways changed communications and society dramatically Crossing the Lagan Canal by the Ulster Railway near Moira, Northern Ireland, a legacy of the Victorian era. Frith's depiction of Paddington railway station in London. Construction of the Metropolitan Railway (1861) A central development during the Victorian era was the rise of rail transport. The new railways all allowed goods, raw materials, and people to be moved about, rapidly facilitating trade and industry. The financing of railways became an important specialty of London's financiers.[174] They retained an ownership share even while turning over management to locals; that ownership was largely liquidated in 1914–1916 to pay for the World War. Railroads originated in England because industrialists had already discovered the need for inexpensive transportation to haul coal for the new steam engines, to supply parts to specialized factories, and to take products to market. The existing system of canals was inexpensive but was too slow and too limited in geography.[175] The railway system led to a reorganisation of society more generally, with "railway time" being the standard by which clocks were set throughout Britain; the complex railway system setting the standard for technological advances and efficiency. The engineers and businessmen needed to create and finance a railway system were available; they knew how to invent, to build, and to finance a large complex system. The first quarter of the 19th century involved numerous experiments with locomotives and rail technology. By 1825 railways were commercially feasible, as demonstrated by George Stephenson (1791–1848) when he built the Stockton and Darlington. On his first run, his locomotive pulled 38 freight and passenger cars at speeds as high as 12 miles per hour. Stephenson went on to design many more railways and is best known for standardizing designs, such as the "standard gauge" of rail spacing, at 4 feet 8½ inches.[176] Thomas Brassey (1805–70) was even more prominent, operating construction crews that at one point in the 1840s totalled 75,000 men throughout Europe, the British Empire, and Latin America.[177] Brassey took thousands of British engineers and mechanics across the globe to build new lines. They invented and improved thousands of mechanical devices, and developed the science of civil engineering to build roadways, tunnels and bridges.[178] Britain had a superior financial system based in London that funded both the railways in Britain and also in many other parts of the world, including the United States, up until 1914. The boom years were 1836 and 1845–47 when Parliament authorised 8,000 miles of lines at a projected cost of £200 million, which was about the same value as the country's annual Gross Domestic Product (GDP) at that time. A new railway needed a charter, which typically cost over £200,000 (about $1 million) to obtain from Parliament, but opposition could effectively prevent its construction. The canal companies, unable or unwilling to upgrade their facilities to compete with railways, used political power to try to stop them. The railways responded by purchasing about a fourth of the canal system, in part to get the right of way, and in part to buy off critics. Once a charter was obtained, there was little government regulation, as laissez-faire and private ownership had become accepted practices.[179] The different lines typically had exclusive territory, but given the compact size of Britain, this meant that multiple competing lines could provide service between major cities. George Hudson (1800–1871) became the "railway king" of Britain. He merged various independent lines and set up a "Clearing House" in 1842 which rationalized interconnections by establishing uniform paperwork and standard methods for transferring passengers and freight between lines, and rates when one system used freight cars owned by another. By 1850, rates had fallen to a penny a ton mile for coal, at speeds of up to fifty miles an hour. Britain now had had the model for the world in a well integrated, well-engineered system that allowed fast, cheap movement of freight and people, and which could be replicated in other major nations. The railways directly or indirectly employed tens of thousands of engineers, mechanics, repairmen and technicians, as well as statisticians and financial planners. They developed new and more efficient and less expensive techniques. Most important, they created a mindset of how technology could be used in many different forms of business. Railways had a major impact on industrialization. By lowering transportation costs, they reduced costs for all industries moving supplies and finished goods, and they increased demand for the production of all the inputs needed for the railroad system itself. By 1880, there were 13,500 locomotives which each carried 97,800 passengers a year, or 31,500 tons of freight.[180] Member of Parliament and Solicitor to the City of London Charles Pearson campaigned for an underground rail service in London. Parts of the first such railway, the Metropolitan Line, opened to the public in 1863, thereby becoming the first subway line in the world. Trains were originally steam-powered, but in 1890, the first electric trains entered service. That same year, the whole system became officially known as the Tube after the shape of the rail tunnels. (It was not until 1908 that the name London Underground was introduced.)[181] India provides an example of the London-based financiers pouring money and expertise into a very well built system designed for military reasons (after the Mutiny of 1857), and with the hope that it would stimulate industry. The system was overbuilt and much too elaborate and expensive for the small amount of freight traffic it carried. However, it did capture the imagination of the Indians, who saw their railways as the symbol of an industrial modernity—but one that was not realized until a century or so later.[182] Public safety, health and medicine A gas network for lighting and heating was introduced in the 1880s.[183] The model town of Saltaire was founded, along with others, as a planned environment with good sanitation and many civic, educational and recreational facilities, although it lacked a pub, which was regarded as a focus of dissent. Although initially developed in the early years of the 19th century, gas lighting became widespread during the Victorian era in industry, homes, public buildings and the streets. The invention of the incandescent gas mantle in the 1890s greatly improved light output and ensured its survival as late as the 1960s. Hundreds of gasworks were constructed in cities and towns across the country. In 1882, incandescent electric lights were introduced to London streets, although it took many years before they were installed everywhere. Medicine progressed during Queen Victoria's reign. In fact, medicine at the start of the nineteenth century was little different from that in the medieval era whereas by the end of the century, it became a lot closer to twenty-first century practice thanks to advances in science, especially microbiology, paving the way for the germ theory of disease. This was during the height of the Industrial Revolution, and urbanisation occurred at a frantic pace. As the population density of the cities grew, epidemics of cholera, smallpox, tuberculosis, and typhus were commonplace.[4] After studying previous outbreaks, physician John Snow drew the conclusion that cholera was a water-borne disease. When the 1854 broke out, Snow mapped the locations of the cases in Soho, London, and found that they centered around a well he deemed contaminated. He asked that the pump's handle be replaced, after which the epidemic petered out. Snow also discovered that households whose water supplies came from companies that used the Thames downstream, after many sewers had flown into the river, were fourteen times more likely to die from cholera. He thus recommended boiling water before use.[4] Sanitation reforms, prompted by the Public Health Acts 1848 and 1869, were made in the crowded, dirty streets of the existing cities, and soap was the main product shown in the relatively new phenomenon of advertising. A great engineering feat in the Victorian Era was the sewage system in London. It was designed by Joseph Bazalgette in 1858. He proposed to build 82 mi (132 km) of sewer system linked with over 1,000 mi (1,600 km) of street sewers. Many problems were encountered but the sewers were completed. After this, Bazalgette designed the Thames Embankment which housed sewers, water pipes and the London Underground. During the same period, London's water supply network was expanded and improved.[183] John Simon, as chief medical officer of the General Board of Health, secured funds for research into various common infectious diseases at the time, including cholera, diphtheria, smallpox, and typhus. Using his political influence, he garnered support for the Public Health Act of 1875, which focused on preventative measures in housing, the water supply, sewage and drainage, providing Britain with an extensive public health system.[4] Joseph Thomas Clover demonstrating the Chloroform apparatus he invented in 1862 By mid-century, the stethoscope became an oft-used device and designs of the microscope had advanced enough for scientists to closely examine pathogens. The pioneering work of French microbiologist Louis Pasteur from the 1850s earned widespread acceptance for the germ theory of disease.[4] It led to the introduction antiseptics by Joseph Lister in 1867 in the form of carbolic acid (phenol).[184] He instructed the hospital staff to wear gloves and wash their hands, instruments, and dressings with a phenol solution and in 1869, he invented a machine that would spray carbolic acid in the operating theatre during surgery.[184] Infection-related deaths fell noticeably as a result.[4] As the British Empire expanded, Britons found themselves facing novel climates and contagions; there was active research into tropical diseases. In 1898, Ronald Ross proved that the mosquito was responsible for spreading malaria.[4] Although nitrous oxide, or laughing gas, had been proposed as an anaesthetic as far back as 1799 by Humphry Davy, it was not until 1846 when an American dentist named William Morton started using ether on his patients that anaesthetics became common in the medical profession.[185] In 1847 chloroform was introduced as an anaesthetic by James Young Simpson.[186] Chloroform was favoured by doctors and hospital staff because it is much less flammable than ether, but critics complained that it could cause the patient to have a heart attack.[186] Chloroform gained in popularity in England and Germany after John Snow gave Queen Victoria chloroform for the birth of her eighth child (Prince Leopold).[187] By 1920, chloroform was used in 80 to 95% of all narcoses performed in the UK and German-speaking countries.[186] A combination of antiseptics and anaesthetics helped surgeons operate more carefully and comfortably on their patients.[4] Anaesthetics made painless dentistry possible. At the same time sugar consumption in the British diet increased, greatly increasing instances of tooth decay.[188] As a result, more and more people were having teeth extracted and needing dentures. This gave rise to "Waterloo Teeth", which were real human teeth set into hand-carved pieces of ivory from hippopotamus or walrus jaws.[188][189] The teeth were obtained from executed criminals, victims of battlefields, from grave-robbers, and were even bought directly from the desperately impoverished.[188] News of the discovery of X-rays in 1895 spread like wildfire. Its medical value was realised immediately, and within a year, doctors were prescribing X-rays for diagnosis, in particular to locate bone fractures and foreign objects inside the patient's body. Radioactivity was discovered 1896, and was later to used to treat cancer.[4] During the second half of the nineteenth century, British medical doctors became increasingly specialised, following the footsteps of their German counterparts, and more hospitals were built. Surgeons began wearing gowns in the operating room and doctors white coats and stethoscopes, sights that are common in the early twenty-first century.[4] Yet despite all the aforementioned medical advances, the mortality rate fell only marginally, from 20.8 per thousand in 1850 to 18.2 by the end of the century. Urbanisation aided the spread of diseases and squalid living conditions in many places exacerbated the problem. Moreover, while some diseases, such as cholera, were being driven out, others, such as sexually transmitted diseases, made themselves felt.[4] Moral standards See also: Victorian morality and Women in the Victorian era Victorian morality was a surprising new reality. The changes in moral standards and actual behaviour across the British were profound. Historian Harold Perkin wrote: Between 1780 and 1850 the English ceased to be one of the most aggressive, brutal, rowdy, outspoken, riotous, cruel and bloodthirsty nations in the world and became one of the most inhibited, polite, orderly, tender-minded, prudish and hypocritical.[190] Historians continue to debate the various causes of this dramatic change. Asa Briggs emphasizes the strong reaction against the French Revolution, and the need to focus British efforts on its defeat and not be diverged by pleasurable sins. Briggs also stresses the powerful role of the evangelical movement among the Nonconformists, as well as the Evangelical faction inside the established Church of England. The religious and political reformers set up organizations that monitored behaviour, and pushed for government action.[191] Among the higher social classes, there was a marked decline in gambling, horse races, and obscene theatres; there was much less heavy gambling or patronage of upscale houses of prostitution. The highly visible debauchery characteristic of aristocratic England in the early 19th century simply disappeared.[192] Historians agree that the middle classes not only professed high personal moral standards, but actually followed them. There is a debate whether the working classes followed suit. Moralists in the late 19th century such as Henry Mayhew decried the slums for their supposed high levels of cohabitation without marriage and illegitimate births. However new research using computerized matching of data files shows that the rates of cohabitation were quite low—under 5%—for the working class and the poor. By contrast, in 21st-century Britain nearly half of all children are born outside marriage, and nine in ten newlyweds have been cohabitating.[193] Crime, police and prisons Crime was getting exponentially worse. There were 4,065 arrests for criminal offenses in 1805, tripling to 14,437 in 1835 and doubling to 31,309 in 1842 in England and Wales.[194] 18th-century British criminology had emphasized severe punishment. Slowly capital punishment was replaced by transportation, first to the American colonies and then to Australia,[195] and, especially, by long-term incarceration in newly built prisons. As one historian points out, "Public and violent punishment which attacked the body by branding, whipping, and hanging was giving way to reformation of the mind of the criminal by breaking his spirit, and encouraging him to reflect on his shame, before labour and religion transformed his character."[196] Crime rates went up, leading to calls for harsher measures ito stop the 'flood of criminals' released under the penal servitude system. The reaction from the committee set up under the commissioner of prisons, Colonel Edmund Frederick du Cane, was to increase minimum sentences for many offences with deterrent principles of 'hard labour, hard fare, and a hard bed'.[197] As the prisons grew more numerous, they became more depraved. Historian S. G. Checkland says, "It was sunk in promiscuity and squalor, jailers' tyranny and greed, and administrative confusion."[198] In 1877 du Cane encouraged Disraeli's government to remove all prisons from local government; he held a firm grip on the prison system till his forced retirement in 1895. By the 1890s, the prison population was over 20,000. By the Victorian era, penal transportation to Australia was falling out of use since it did not reduce crime rates.[199] The British penal system underwent a transition from harsh punishment to reform, education, and training for post-prison livelihoods. The reforms were controversial and contested. In 1877–1914 era a series of major legislative reforms enabled significant improvement in the penal system. In 1877, the previously localized prisons were nationalized in the Home Office under a Prison Commission. The Prison Act of 1898 enabled the Home Secretary to impose multiple reforms on his own initiative, without going through the politicized process of Parliament. The Probation of Offenders Act of 1907 introduced a new probation system that drastically cut down the prison population, while providing a mechanism for transition back to normal life. The Criminal Justice Administration Act of 1914 required courts to allow a reasonable time before imprisonment was ordered for people who did not pay their fines. Previously tens of thousands of prisoners had been sentenced solely for that reason. The Borstal system after 1908 was organized to reclaim young offenders, and the Children Act of 1908 prohibited imprisonment under age 14, and strictly limited that of ages 14 to 16. The principal reformer was Sir Evelyn Ruggles-Brise, the chair of the Prison Commission.[200][201] Prostitution Further information: Victorian morality § Prostitution, and Prostitution in the United Kingdom § 19th century During Victorian England, prostitution was seen as a "great social evil" by clergymen and major news organizations, but many feminists viewed prostitution as a means of economic independence for women. Estimates of the number of prostitutes in London in the 1850s vary widely, but in his landmark study, Prostitution, William Acton reported an estimation of 8,600 prostitutes in London alone in 1857.[202] The differing views on prostitution have made it difficult to understand its history. Judith Walkowitz has multiple works focusing on the feminist point of view on the topic of prostitution. Many sources blame economic disparities as leading factors in the rise of prostitution, and Walkowitz writes that the demographic within prostitution varied greatly. However, women who struggled financially were much more likely to be prostitutes than those with a secure source of income. Orphaned or half-orphaned women were more likely to turn to prostitution as a means of income.[203] While overcrowding in urban cities and the amount of job opportunities for females were limited, Walkowitz argues that there were other variables that lead women to prostitution. Walkowitz acknowledges that prostitution allowed for women to feel a sense of independence and self-respect.[203] Although many assume that pimps controlled and exploited these prostitutes, some women managed their own clientele and pricing. It is evident that women were exploited by this system, yet Walkowitz says that prostitution was often their opportunity to gain social and economic independence.[203] Prostitution at this time was regarded by women in the profession to be a short-term position, and once they earned enough money, there were hopes that they would move on to a different profession.[204] As previously stated, the arguments for and against prostitution varied greatly from it being perceived as a mortal sin or desperate decision to an independent choice. While there were plenty of people publicly denouncing prostitution in England, there were also others who took opposition to them. One event that sparked a lot of controversy was the implementation of the Contagious Diseases Acts. This was a series of three acts in 1864, 1866 and 1869 that allowed police officers to stop women whom they believed to be prostitutes and force them to be examined.[203] If the suspected woman was found with a venereal disease, they placed the woman into a Lock Hospital. Arguments made against the acts claimed that the regulations were unconstitutional and that they only targeted women.[205] In 1869, a National Association in opposition of the acts was created. Because women were excluded from the first National Association, the Ladies National Association was formed. The leader of that organization was Josephine Butler.[203] Butler was an outspoken feminist during this time who fought for many social reforms. Her book Personal Reminiscences of a Great Crusade describes her oppositions to the C.D. acts.[206] Along with the publication of her book, she also went on tours condemning the C.D. acts throughout the 1870s.[207] Other supporters of reforming the acts included Quakers, Methodists and many doctors.[205] Eventually the acts were fully repealed in 1886.[205] The book Prostitution-Action by Dr. William Acton included detailed reports on his observations of prostitutes and the hospitals they would be placed in if they were found with a venereal disease.[202] Acton believed that prostitution was a poor institution but it is a result of the supply and demand for it. He wrote that men had sexual desires and they sought to relieve them, and for many, prostitution was the way to do it.[202] While he referred to prostitutes as wretched women, he did note how the acts unfairly criminalized women and ignored the men involved.[202][204] Events The 1843 launch of the Great Britain, the revolutionary ship of Isambard Kingdom Brunel First Opium War: British ships approaching Canton in May 1841 The last of the mail coaches at Newcastle upon Tyne, 1848 Governor-General of India Lord Canning meets Maharaja Ranbir Singh of Jammu and Kashmir, 1860 The defence of Rorke's Drift during the Anglo-Zulu War of 1879 Following the Fourth Anglo-Ashanti War in 1896, the British proclaimed a protectorate over the Ashanti Kingdom. The author Constance Wilde, wife of Oscar Wilde, pictured with son Cyril, 1889 Daimler Wagonette, Ireland, c. 1899 British and Australian officers in South Africa during the Second Boer War Workmen leaving Platt's Works, Oldham, 1900 1850 Restoration of the Roman Catholic hierarchy in England and Wales. (Scotland did not follow until 1878.) 1832 Passage of the first Reform Act.[208] 1833 The first Tract for the Times is written by John Henry Newman, starting the Oxford Movement in the Church of England. 1837 Ascension of Queen Victoria to the throne.[208] 1838 Treaty of Balta Liman (Great Britain trade alliance with the Ottoman Empire). 1839 First Opium War (1839–42) fought between Britain and China. 1840 Queen Victoria marries Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg-Saalfield. He had been naturalised and granted the British style of Royal Highness beforehand. For the next 17 years, he was known as HRH Prince Albert. 1840 New Zealand becomes a British colony, through the Treaty of Waitangi. No longer part of New South Wales 1842 Treaty of Nanking. The Massacre of Elphinstone's Army by the Afghans in Afghanistan results in the death or incarceration of 16,500 soldiers and civilians.[209] The Mines Act of 1842 banned women/children from working in coal, iron, lead and tin mining.[208] The Illustrated London News was first published.[210] 1845 The Irish famine begins. Within 5 years it would become the UK's worst human disaster, with starvation and emigration reducing the population of Ireland itself by over 50%. The famine permanently changed Ireland's and Scotland's demographics and became a rallying point for nationalist sentiment that pervaded British politics for much of the following century. 1846 Repeal of the Corn Laws.[208] 1848 Death of around 2,000 people a week in a cholera epidemic. 1851 The Great Exhibition (the first World's Fair) is held at the Crystal Palace,[208] with great success and international attention. The Victorian gold rush. In ten years the Australian population nearly tripled.[211] 1854 Crimean War: Britain, France and Turkey declare limited war on Russia. Russia loses. 1857 The Indian Mutiny, a concentrated revolt in northern India against the rule of the privately owned British East India Company, is sparked by sepoys (native Indian soldiers) in the Company's army. The rebellion, involving not just sepoys but many sectors of the Indian population as well, is largely quashed within a year. The East India Company is replaced by the British government beginning the period of the British Raj. 1858 The Prime Minister, Lord Palmerston, responds to the Orsini plot against French Emperor Napoleon III, the bombs for which were purchased in Birmingham, by attempting to make such acts a felony; the resulting uproar forces him to resign. 1859 Charles Darwin publishes On the Origin of Species, which leads to various reactions.[208] Victoria and Albert's first grandchild, Prince Wilhelm of Prussia, is born – he later became William II, German Emperor. John Stuart Mill publishes On Liberty, a defence of the famous harm principle. 1861 Death of Prince Albert;[208] Queen Victoria refuses to go out in public for many years, and when she did she wore a widow's bonnet instead of the crown. 1865 Lewis Carroll's Alice's Adventures in Wonderland is published. 1866 An angry crowd in London, protesting against John Russell's resignation as Prime Minister, is barred from Hyde Park by the police; they tear down iron railings and trample on flower beds. Disturbances like this convince Derby and Disraeli of the need for further parliamentary reform. 1867 The Constitution Act, 1867 passes and British North America becomes Dominion of Canada. 1875 Britain purchased Egypt's shares in the Suez Canal[208] as the African nation was forced to raise money to pay off its debts. 1876 Scottish-born inventor Alexander Graham Bell patents the telephone. 1878 Treaty of Berlin. Cyprus becomes a Crown colony. 1879 The Battle of Isandlwana is the first major encounter in the Anglo-Zulu War. 1881 The British suffer defeat at the Battle of Majuba Hill, leading to the signing of a peace treaty and later the Pretoria Convention, between the British and the reinstated South African Republic, ending the First Boer War. Sometimes claimed to mark the beginning of the decline of the British Empire.[212] 1882 British troops begin the occupation of Egypt by taking the Suez Canal, to secure the vital trade route and passage to India, and the country becomes a protectorate. 1884 The Fabian Society is founded in London by a group of middle-class intellectuals, including Quaker Edward R. Pease, Havelock Ellis and E. Nesbit, to promote socialism.[213] Prince Leopold, Duke of Albany dies. 1885 Blackpool Electric Tramway Company starts the first electric tram service in the United Kingdom. 1886 Prime Minister William Ewart Gladstone and the Liberal Party tries passing the First Irish Home Rule Bill, but the House of Commons rejects it. 1888 The serial killer known as Jack the Ripper murders and mutilates five (and possibly more) prostitutes on the streets of London. 1889 Emily Williamson founds the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds. 1870–1891 Under the Elementary Education Act 1870, basic State Education becomes free for every child under the age of 10.[214] 1898 British and Egyptian troops led by Horatio Kitchener defeat the Mahdist forces at the battle of Omdurman, thus establishing British dominance in the Sudan. Winston Churchill takes part in the British cavalry charge at Omdurman. 1899 The Second Boer War is fought between the British Empire and the two independent Boer republics. The Boers finally surrendered and the British annexed the Boer republics. 1901 The death of Victoria sees the end of this era. The ascension of her eldest son, Edward, begins the Edwardian era. See also History portal United Kingdom portal Victorian era portal Wikimedia Commons has media related to Victorian era. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland covers politics and diplomacy Historiography of the United Kingdom Historiography of the British Empire International relations of the Great Powers (1814–1919) Imperialism Pax Britannica Victorian decorative arts Victorian fashion Victorian morality Victorian literature Neo-Victorian Social history of England Women in the Victorian era Victoriana Horror Victorianorum Victorian cemeteries Gilded Age, in the United States Belle Époque, in France Citations ^ Dixon, Nicholas (2010). "From Georgian to Victorian". History Review. 2010 (68): 34–38. Archived from the original on 27 January 2013. Retrieved 5 April 2013. ^ a b c d Dutton, Edward; Woodley of Menie, Michael (2018). "Chapter 7: How Did Selection for Intelligence Go Into Reverse?". At Our Wits' End: Why We're Becoming Less Intelligent and What It Means for the Future. Great Britain: Imprint Academic. pp. 85, 95–6. ISBN 9781845409852. ^ a b c d e f g h Atterbury, Paul (17 February 2011). "Victorian Technology". BBC History. Retrieved 13 October 2020. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Robinson, Bruce (17 February 2011). "Victorian Medicine – From Fluke to Theory". BBC History. Retrieved 13 October 2020. ^ a b Woodley of Menie, Michael; te Nijenhuis, Jan; Murphy, Raegan (November–December 2013). "Were the Victorians cleverer than us? The decline in general intelligence estimated from a meta-analysis of the slowing of simple reaction time". Intelligence. 41 (6): 843–50. ^ The UK and future Archived 15 February 2006 at the UK Government Web Archive, Government of the United Kingdom ^ "Ireland – Population Summary". Homepage.tinet.ie. Archived from the original on 28 July 2011. Retrieved 10 August 2010. ^ Exiles and Emigrants Archived 22 June 2009 at the Wayback Machine. National Museum of Australia ^ a b c d Daniels, Morna. "Aspects of the Victorian Book: Children's Books". British Library. Retrieved 10 October 2020. ^ a b c Eliot, Simon. "Aspects of the Victorian Book: Introduction". British Library. Retrieved 8 October 2020. ^ a b c "Aspects of the Victorian book: Magazines for Women". British Library. Retrieved 23 October 2020. ^ John Wolffe (1997). Religion in Victorian Britain: Culture and empire. Volume V. Manchester University Press. pp. 129–30. ISBN 9780719051845. Archived from the original on 10 May 2016. Retrieved 29 October 2015. ^ Lawrence James, The rise and fall of the British Empire (1994) pp 169–318. ^ a b c d e f g h E.A. Benians et al. eds. The Cambridge History of the British Empire Vol. iii: The Empire – Commonwealth 1870–1919' (1959) pp 1–16. online ^ a b c d Garraty, John A. (1991). "Chapter XVI: The War to Save the Union". The American Nation: A History of the United States. United States of America: Harper Collins. p. 423. ISBN 0-06-042312-9. ^ a b c d e f g h i j J. Holland Rose et al. eds. The Cambridge History of the British Empire Vol-ii: The Growth of the New Empire 1783–1870 (1940) pp v–ix. online ^ a b Plunkett, John; et al., eds. (2012). Victorian Literature: A Sourcebook. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. p. 2. ^ Hewitt, Martin (Spring 2006). "Why the Notion of Victorian Britain Does Make Sense". Victorian Studies. 48 (3): 395–438. doi:10.2979/VIC.2006.48.3.395. Archived from the original on 30 October 2017. Retrieved 23 May 2017. ^ M Sadleir, Trollope (London 1945) p. 17 ^ M Sadleir, Trollope (London 1945) p. 18-19 ^ M Sadleir, Trollope (London 1945) p. 13 and p. 32 ^ M Sadleir, Trollope (London 1945) pp. 25–30 ^ G M Trevelyan, History of England (London 1926) p. 650 ^ a b c d e f g h "Queen Victoria: The woman who redefined Britain's monarchy". BBC Teach. Retrieved 12 October 2020. ^ a b c Tidridge, Nathan (28 March 2017). "It's time to embrace the 'Mother of Confederation'". Macleans. Retrieved 15 October 2020. ^ a b Swisher, ed., Victorian England, pp. 248–50. ^ a b c National Geographic (2007). Essential Visual History of the World. National Geographic Society. pp. 290–92. ISBN 978-1-4262-0091-5. ^ Kinealy, Christine (1994), This Great Calamity, Gill & Macmillan, p. xv ^ Lusztig, Michael (July 1995). "Solving Peel's Puzzle: Repeal of the Corn Laws and Institutional Preservation". Comparative Politics. 27 (4): 393–408. doi:10.2307/422226. JSTOR 422226. ^ Taylor, A. J. P. (1954). The Struggle for Mastery in Europe: 1848–1918. OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS,MUMBAI. pp. 60–61. ^ Jill C. Bender, The 1857 Indian Uprising and the British Empire (2016), 205pp. ^ a b Amanda Foreman, A World on Fire: Britain's Crucial Role in the American Civil War (2012). ^ Roy Jenkins, "From Gladstone To Asquith: The Late Victorian Pattern Of Liberal Leadership." History Today (1964) 14#7 pp 445–452, online. ^ National Geographic (2007). Essential Visual History of the World. National Geographic Society. p. 398. ISBN 978-1-4262-0091-5. ^ "Queen Victoria: The real story of her 'domestic bliss'". BBC Magazine. 1 January 2013. Retrieved 12 October 2020. ^ Houghton, The Victorian Frame of Mind, p. 1 ^ Wohl, Anthony S. (1978). The Victorian family: structure and stresses. London: Croom Helm. ISBN 9780856644382. Cited in: Summerscale, Kate (2008). The suspicions of Mr. Whicher or the murder at Road Hill House. London: Bloomsbury. pp. 109–110. ISBN 9780747596486. (novel) ^ Asa Briggs, The Age of Improvement 1783–1867 (1957) pp 236–85. ^ On the interactions of Evangelicalism and utilitarianism see Élie Halévy, A History of the English People in 1815 (1924) 585–95; also 3:213–15. ^ G.M. Young, Victorian England: Portrait of an Age (1936, 2nd ed, 1953), pp 1–6. ^ Briggs, The Age of Improvement 1783–1867 (1957) p 447. ^ John Roach, "Liberalism and the Victorian Intelligentsia." Cambridge Historical Journal 13#1 (1957): 58–81. online. ^ Young, Victorian England: Portrait of an Age pp 10–12. ^ On the interactions of Evangelicalism and utilitarianism see Élie Halévy, A History of the English People in 1815 (1924) 585–95; see pp 213–15. ^ Llewellyn Woodward, The Age of Reform, 1815–1870 (1962), pp 28, 78–90, 446, 456, 464–65. ^ D. W. Bebbington, The Nonconformist Conscience: Chapel and Politics, 1870–1914 (George Allen & Unwin, 1982) ^ David L. Wykes, "Introduction: Parliament and Dissent from the Restoration to the Twentieth Century," Parliamentary History (2005) 24#1 pp 1–26 ^ Owen Chadwick, The Victorian church (1966) 1:7–9, 47–48. ^ Walter E. Houghton, The Victorian Frame of Mind, 1830–1870 (1957) p 33. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Lewis, Christopher (2007). "Chapter 5: Energy and Entropy: The Birth of Thermodynamics". Heat and Thermodynamics: A Historical Perspective. United States of America: Greenwood Press. ISBN 978-0-313-33332-3. ^ John Ramsden (ed.), The Oxford Companion to Twentieth-Century British Politics (2005), p. 474. ^ D. W. Bebbington, The Nonconformist Conscience. Chapel and Politics, 1870–1914 (1982). ^ Sally Mitchell, Victorian Britain An Encyclopedia (2011), p 547 ^ Michael R. Watts (2015). The Dissenters: The crisis and conscience of nonconformity. Clarendon Press. p. 105. ISBN 9780198229698. ^ Timothy Larsen, "A Nonconformist Conscience? Free Churchmen in Parliament in Nineteenth‐Century England." Parliamentary History 24#1 (2005): 107–119. ^ Richard Helmstadter, "The Nonconformist Conscience" in Peter Marsh, ed., The Conscience of the Victorian State (1979) pp 135–72. ^ Glaser, John F. (1958). "English Nonconformity and the Decline of Liberalism". The American Historical Review. 63 (2): 352–363. doi:10.2307/1849549. JSTOR 1849549. ^ G. I. T. Machin, "Resistance to Repeal of the Test and Corporation Acts, 1828." Historical Journal 22#1 (1979): 115–139. ^ Davis, R. W. (1966). "The Strategy of "Dissent" in the Repeal Campaign, 1820–1828". The Journal of Modern History. 38 (4): 374–393. doi:10.1086/239951. JSTOR 1876681. ^ Olive Anderson, "Gladstone's Abolition of Compulsory Church Rates: a Minor Political Myth and its Historiographical Career." Journal of Ecclesiastical History 25#2 (1974): 185–198. ^ G. I. T. Machin, "Gladstone and Nonconformity in the 1860s: The Formation of an Alliance'." Historical Journal 17 (1974): 347–64. ^ Jacob P. Ellens, Religious Routes to Gladstonian Liberalism: The Church Rate Conflict in England and Wales 1852–1868 (2010). ^ Richard Helmstadter, "The Nonconformist Conscience" in Peter Marsh, ed., The Conscience of the Victorian State (1979) pp 144–47. ^ Helmstadter, "The Nonconformist Conscience" p 147. ^ Alastair Bonnett 'The Agnostic Saladin' History Today (2013), 63#2, pp. 47–52 ^ Owen Chadwick, The Victorian Church: Vol 1 1829–1859 (1966) pp 487–89. ^ Edward Royle, Victorian Infidels: the origins of the British secularist movement, 1791–1866 (1972) pp 86–88. online ^ Shirley A. Mullen, "Organized Freethought: The Religion of Unbelief in Victorian England (2017), introduction. ^ Bernard Lightman, Origins of Agnosticism: Victorian Unbelief & the Limits of Knowledge (1987) ^ Bernard Lightman, "Huxley and scientific agnosticism: the strange history of a failed rhetorical strategy." British Journal for the History of Science #3 (2002) 272–94. ^ K. Theodore Hoppen, The mid-Victorian generation, 1846–1886 (2000), pp 316ff. ^ Robyn Ryle (2012). Questioning gender: a sociological exploration. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: SAGE/Pine Forge Press. pp. 342–43. ISBN 978-1-4129-6594-1. ^ Linda Wilson, "' Constrained by Zeal': Women in Mid‐NineteenthCentury Nonconformist Churches." Journal of Religious History 23.2 (1999): 185–202. ^ Susan Rubinow Gorsky, Femininity to Feminism: Women and Literature in the Nineteenth Century (1992) ^ F. Elizabeth Gray, "Angel of the House" in Adams, ed., Encyclopedia of the Victorian Era (2004) 1: 40–41 ^ a b Boston, Michelle (12 February 2019). "Five Victorian paintings that break tradition in their celebration of love". USC Dornsife. University of Southern California. Retrieved 18 December 2020. ^ a b Dutton, Edward; van der Linden, Dimitri; Lynn, Richard (November–December 2016). "The negative Flynn Effect: A systematic literature review". Intelligence. 59: 163–9. ^ a b Gambino, Megan (3 December 2012). "Are You Smarter Than Your Grandfather? Probably Not". Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 22 October 2020. ^ Edward C. Mack, Public Schools and British Opinion since 1860 (1941) online. ^ a b c d Dash, Mike (28 October 2011). "The Woman Who Bested the Men at Math". Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 21 October 2020. ^ a b c "Aspects of the Victorian book: the novel". British Library. Retrieved 23 October 2020. ^ a b Warner, Marina (5 May 2007). "Evangelists for the bard". Books. The Guardian. Retrieved 28 October 2020. ^ McGillis, Roderick (6 May 2016). "Children's Literature - Victorian Literature". Oxford Bibliographies. Retrieved 28 October 2020. ^ John, Juliet, ed. (2016). The Oxford Handbook of Victorian Literary Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 1–2. ^ McCrum, Robert (26 June 2017). "Tales from Shakespeare by Charles and Mary Lamb (1807)". Books. The Guardian. Retrieved 29 October 2020. ^ a b Holmes, Richard (22 October 2014). "In retrospect: On the Connexion of the Physical Sciences". Nature. 514: 432–433. ^ a b Baraniuk, Chris (28 June 2017). "Mary Somerville: Queen of 19th-century science". New Scientist. 235 (3132): 40–1. ^ Strickland, Elisabetta (September 2017). "Mary Fairfax Somerville, Queen of Science". Notices of the American Mathematical Society. 64 (8): 929–31. ^ Arianrhod, Robyn (22 March 2019). "A brief history of science writing shows the rise of the female voice". Social Sciences. Phys.org. Retrieved 28 October 2020. ^ Flanders, Judith (15 May 2014). "The creation of the police and the rise of detective fiction". British Library. Retrieved 30 October 2020. ^ Sutherland, John (15 March 2014). "Sherlock Holmes, the world's most famous literary detective". British Library. Retrieved 30 October 2020. ^ "Writing the future: A timeline of science fiction literature". BBC Teach. Retrieved 28 October 2020. ^ Woodley of Menie, Michael; Fernandes, Heitor B. F.; Figueredo, Aurelio José; Meisenberg, Gerhard (21 April 2015). "By their words ye shall know them: Evidence of genetic selection against general intelligence and concurrent environmental enrichment in vocabulary usage since the mid 19th century". Frontiers in Psychology. 6. ^ a b Dutton, Edward; Woodley of Menie, Michael (2018). "Chapter 9: Is There Really Hard Evidence that Intelligence Is Declining?". At Our Wits' End: Why We're Becoming Less Intelligent and What It Means for the Future. Great Britain: Imprint Academic. pp. 131–3. ISBN 9781845409852. ^ John, Juliet (2 March 2011). "Melodrama". Oxford Bibliographies. Retrieved 6 November 2020. ^ Peter Bailey, Leisure and class in Victorian England: Rational Recreation and the contest for control, 1830–1885 (Routledge, 2014) ^ Hazel Conway, People's parks: the design and development of Victorian parks in Britain (Cambridge University Press, 1991) ^ Brenda Assael, The circus and Victorian society (U of Virginia Press, 2005) ^ "19th century Circus Peep behind the scenes". Fairsarefun.net. 6 January 1990. Archived from the original on 11 March 2012. Retrieved 9 April 2011. ^ Alison Winter, Mesmerized: powers of mind in Victorian Britain (U of Chicago Press, 2000) ^ Lynn L. Merrill, The romance of Victorian natural history (Oxford University Press, 1989) ^ Simon Naylor, "The field, the museum and the lecture hall: the spaces of natural history in Victorian Cornwall." Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers (2002) 27#4 pp: 494–513. online Archived 17 September 2015 at the Wayback Machine ^ John K. Walton, The English seaside resort. A social history 1750–1914 (Leicester University Press, 1983) ^ William J. Baker, "The state of British sport history". Journal of Sport History 10.1 (1983): 53–66. online Archived 12 September 2016 at the Wayback Machine ^ Joe Maguire, "Images of manliness and competing ways of living in late Victorian and Edwardian Britain". International Journal of the History of Sport 3.3 (1986): 265–287. ^ Keith A. P. Sandiford, Cricket and the Victorians (Routledge Press, 1994). ^ "Victorian Games & Sports, Tennis, Cricket, Football, Croquet, Cycling" in Victorian-Era.org Online Archived 6 June 2017 at the Wayback Machine ^ "Victorian Era Paintings". Victorian Era. Retrieved 18 December 2020. ^ Reginald Watters, "Thomas Barnes and 'The Times' 1817–1841," History Today (1979) 29#9 pp 561–68 ^ Trowbridge H. Ford, "Political Coverage in 'The Times,' 1811–41: The Role of Barnes and Brougham," Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research (1986) 59#139, pp 91–107. ^ Alan Hankinson, Man of Wars: William Howard Russell of 'The Times' (1982) ^ "Royal Albert Hall." Survey of London: Volume 38, South Kensington Museums Area. Ed. F H W Sheppard. London: London County Council, 1975. 177–195. British History Online. Web. 19 October 2020. ^ G. R. Searle, A New England?: Peace and War, 1886–1918 (Oxford University Press, 2004), 529–70. ^ Hugh Cunningham, Time, work and leisure: Life changes in England since 1700 (2014) ^ John K. Walton, The English seaside resort. A social history 1750–1914 (1983). ^ Searle, A New England? pp 547–53 ^ "Malthus, An Essay on the Principle of Population: Library of Economics" ^ Kaufmann, Eric (2013). "Chapter 7: Sacralization by Stealth? The Religious Consequences of Low Fertility in Europe". In Kaufmann, Eric; Wilcox, W. Bradford (eds.). Whither the Child? Causes and Consequences of Low Fertility. Boulder, Colorado, United States: Paradigm Publishers. pp. 135–56. ISBN 978-1-61205-093-5. ^ a b Szreter, Simon (1988). "The importance of social intervention in Britain's mortality decline c.1850–1914: A re-interpretation of the role of public health". Social History of Medicine. 1: 1–37. doi:10.1093/shm/1.1.1. S2CID 34704101. (subscription required) ^ Robert W. Fogel, The Escape from Hunger and Premature Death, 1700–2100: Europe, America, and the Third World (Cambridge Studies in Population, Economy and Society in Past Time) (2004) p 40 ^ Simon Szreter, Fertility, class and gender in Britain, 1860–1940 (Cambridge University Press, 2002). ^ Roberts, Elizabeth (1984). A Woman's Place: An Oral History of Working – Class Women 1890 – 1940. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. p. 85. ^ Bradlaw and Besant published 'Fruits of Philosophy', which is a publication about birth control. ^ Woodle of Menie, Michael (March 2015). "How fragile is our intellect? Estimating losses in general intelligence due to both selection and mutation accumulation". Personality and Individual Differences. 75: 80–84. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.10.047. ^ Houghton, The Victorian Frame of Mind, p. 5 ^ Bernard Porter, Britannia's Burden: The Political Evolution of Modern Britain 1851–1890 (1994) ch 3 ^ a b Hobsbawn, Eric (1995). "Chapter Nine: The Golden Years". The Age of Extremes: The Short Twentieth Century 1914-1991. Abacus. ISBN 9780349106717. ^ F. M. L. Thompson, Rise of Respectable Society: A Social History of Victorian Britain, 1830–1900 (1988) pP 211–14 ^ Porter, ch 1–3; K Theodore Hoppen, The Mid-Victorian Generation: 1846–1886 (1998), ch 1 to 3, 9–11 ^ Llewellyn Woodward, The Age of Reform, 1815–1870 (2nd ed. 1962) p 629 ^ a b Testimony Gathered by Ashley's Mines Commission Archived 19 December 2008 at the Wayback Machine Laura Del Col, West Virginia University ^ Dyos, H. J. (1968). "The Speculative Builders and Developers of Victorian London". Victorian Studies. 11: 641–690. JSTOR 3825462. ^ Christopher Powell, The British building industry since 1800: An economic history (Taylor & Francis, 1996). ^ P. Kemp, "Housing landlordism in late nineteenth-century Britain." Environment and Planning A 14.11 (1982): 1437–1447. ^ Dyos, H. J. (1967). "The Slums of Victorian London". Victorian Studies. 11 (1): 5–40. JSTOR 3825891. ^ Anthony S. Wohl, The eternal slum: housing and social policy in Victorian London (1977). ^ Martin J. Daunton, House and home in the Victorian city: working class housing, 1850–1914 (1983). ^ J. A. R. Marriott, Modern England: 1885–1945 (4th ed., 1948) p 166. ^ a b c Barbara Daniels, Poverty and Families in the Victorian Era Archived 6 December 2008 at the Wayback Machine ^ Jane Humphries, Childhood & Child Labour in The British Industrial Revolution (Cambridge UP, 2016). ^ Del Col, Laura (1988). "The Life of the Industrial Worker in Ninteenth-Century [sic] England". The Victorian Web. Archived from the original on 25 March 2015. Retrieved 19 March 2015. ^ a b Child Labor Archived 21 January 2009 at the Wayback Machine David Cody, Hartwick College ^ Baigrie, Brian (2007). "Postscript: Founding of the Royal Institution". Electricity and Magnetism: A Historical Perspective. United States of America: Greenwood Press. pp. 60–1. ISBN 0-313-33358-0. ^ Mugglestone, Lynda (16 August 2012). "Nineteenth-century English—an overview". Oxford English Dictionary. Retrieved 7 November 2020. ^ Lionel Thomas Caswell Rolt, Victorian engineering (Penguin, 1974). ^ Herbert L. Sussman, Victorian technology: invention, innovation, and the rise of the machine (ABC-CLIO, 2009) ^ Arbesman, Samuel (February 2011). "Quantifying the Ease of Scientific Discovery". Scientometrics. 86 (2): 245–250. doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0232-6. ^ Badash, Lawrence (1972). "The completeness of nineteenth-century science". Isis. 63 (1): 48–58. ^ a b c Katz, Victor (2009). "Chapter 23: Probability and Statistics in the Nineteenth Century". A History of Mathematics: An Introduction. Addison-Wesley. pp. 824–30. ISBN 0-321-38700-7. ^ a b Kline, Morris (1972). Mathematical Thought from Ancient to Modern Times. United States of America: Oxford University Press. pp. 682–4, 692–6. ISBN 0-19-506136-5. ^ a b Stewart, John (2012). "Chapter 16: Vector Calculus". Calculus: Early Transcendentals (7th ed.). United States of America: Cengage Learning. pp. 1084–5, 1123, 1128. ISBN 978-0-538-49790-9. ^ a b Katz, Victor (May 1979). "A History of Stokes' Theorem". Mathematics Magazine. 52 (3): 146–156. ^ Kline, Morris (1972). "Chapter 33: Determinants and Matrices". Mathematical Thought from Ancient to Modern Times. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-506136-5. ^ Kline, Morris (1972). "28.7: Systems of Partial Differential Equations". Mathematical Thought from Ancient to Modern Times. United States of America: Oxford University Press. pp. 696–7. ISBN 0-19-506136-5. ^ Hecht, Eugene (2017). "8.13: A Mathematical Description of Polarization". Optics (5th ed.). Pearson. pp. 379–81. ISBN 978-0-133-97722-6. ^ a b Kline, Morris (1972). "Chapter 30: The Calculus of Variations in the Nineteenth Century". Mathematical Thought from Ancient to Modern Times. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-506136-5. ^ a b Gribbin, John (2012). "Chapter 6: Matrices and Waves". In Search of Schrodinger's Cat: Quantum Physics and Reality. Great Britain: Penguin Random House. pp. 147, 155–6. ISBN 978-0-552-12555-0. ^ Herbert, Goldstein (1980). "10.2: Geometrical Optics and Wave Mechanics". Classical Mechanics (2nd ed.). Addison-Wesley. p. 489. ISBN 0-201-02918-9. ^ a b Lewis, Christopher (2007). "Chapter 4: The Mechanical Equivalent of Heat". Heat and Thermodynamics: A Historical Perspective. United States of America: Greenwood Press. ISBN 978-0-313-33332-3. ^ Lewis, Christopher (2007). Heat and Thermodynamics: A Historical Perspective. Greenwood Press. pp. 79, 124–7. ISBN 978-0-313-33332-3. ^ Lanczos, Cornelius (1970). The Variational Principles of Mechanics. Dover Publications. p. 125. ISBN 978-0-486-65067-8. ^ Goldstein, Herbert (1980). "8.3: Routh's Procedure and Oscillations About Steady Motion". Classical Mechanics (2nd ed.). Addison-Wesley. p. 356. ISBN 0-201-02918-9. ^ Landau, Lev; LIfshitz, Evgeny (1976). "41: The Routhian". Course of Theoretical Physics Volume 1: Mechanics. Translated by Sykes, J.B.; Bell, J.S. (3rd ed.). Elsevier. pp. 133–4. ISBN 0-7506-2896-0. ^ Coutinho, S. C. (1 May 2014). "Whittaker's analytical dynamics: a biography". Archive for History of Exact Sciences. 68 (3): 355–407. ^ a b Lewis, Christoper (2007). "Chapter 7: Black Bodies, Free Energy, and Absolute Zero". Heat and Thermodynamics: A Historical Perspective. United States of America: Greenwood Press. ISBN 978-0-313-33332-3. ^ a b c Baigrie, Brian (2007). "Chapter 8: Forces and Fields". Electricity and Magnetism: A Historical Perspective. United States of America: Greenwood Press. ISBN 0-313-33358-0. ^ a b Baigrie, Brian (2007). "Chapter 9: The Science of Electromagnetism". Electricity and Magnetism: A Historical Perspective. United States of America: Greenwood Press. ISBN 0-313-33358-0. ^ a b Baigrie, Brian (2007). "Chapter 10: Electromagnetic Waves". Electricity and Magnetism: A Historical Perspective. United States of America: Greenwood Press. ISBN 0-313-33358-0. ^ a b Hunt, Bruce (1 November 2012). "Oliver Heaviside: A first-rate oddity". Physics Today. 65 (11). ^ Gribbin, John (2012). "Chapter 2: Atoms". In Search of Schrodinger's Cat: Quantum Physics and Reality. Great Britain: Transworld Publishers. pp. 45–6. ISBN 978-0-552-12555-0. ^ Katz, Victor (2009). "21.3: Symbolic Algebra". A History of Mathematics: An Introduction. Addison-Wesley. pp. 738–9. ISBN 0-321-38700-7. ^ a b c Katz, Victor (2009). "25.5: Computers and Applications". A History of Mathematics: An Introduction. Addison-Wesley. pp. 908–13. ISBN 0-321-38700-7. ^ Tom Standage, The Victorian Internet: The remarkable story of the telegraph and the nineteenth century's online pioneers (Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1998). ^ John R. Kellett, The impact of railways on Victorian cities (Routledge, 2007). ^ Jack Simmons and Gordon Biddle, eds., The Oxford Companion to British Railway History: From 1603 to the 1990s (2nd ed. 1999) ^ L.T.C. Rolt, George & Robert Stephenson: The Railway Revolution (1960). ^ For example see John H. Jensen and Gerhard Rosegger. "British Railway Builders along the Lower Danube, 1856–1869." Slavonic and East European Review 46#106 (1968): 105–128; H. R. Stones, British railways in Argentina 1860–1948 (1993) ^ Charles Walker, Thomas Brassey: railway builder (1969). ^ Mark Casson, The World's First Railway System: Enterprise, Competition, and Regulation on the Railway Network in Victorian Britain (2009). ^ R. S Joby, The Railway Builders: Lives and Works of the Victorian Railway Contractors (1983) ^ Attwooll, Jolyon (9 January 2017). "150 London Underground facts (including the birth of Jerry Springer in East Finchley station)". The Telegraph. Retrieved 11 November 2020. ^ Ian J. Kerr, Building the Railways of the Raj, 1850–1900 (1995). ^ a b Anthony S. Wohl, Endangered lives: public health in Victorian Britain (JM Dent and Sons, 1983) ^ a b "Joseph Lister". Web.ukonline.co.uk. 10 February 1912. Archived from the original on 31 August 2010. Retrieved 10 August 2010. ^ "Dr William Green Morton (1819–68)". General-anaesthesia.com. Archived from the original on 21 August 2010. Retrieved 10 August 2010. ^ a b c "History of chloroform anaesthesia". General-anaesthesia.com. Archived from the original on 22 February 2010. Retrieved 10 August 2010. ^ Ralph R. Frerichs. "Anesthesia and Queen Victoria". Ph.ucla.edu. Archived from the original on 16 July 2012. Retrieved 10 August 2010. ^ a b c "h2g2 – Waterloo Teeth: A History of Dentures". BBC. 24 August 2005. Archived from the original on 17 March 2011. Retrieved 10 August 2010. ^ "Waterloo Teeth". Historyhome.co.uk. Archived from the original on 24 November 2010. Retrieved 10 August 2010. ^ Harold Perkin, The Origins of Modern English Society (1969) p. 280. ^ Asa Briggs, The Age of Improvement: 1783–1867 (1959), pp. 66–74, 286–87, 436 ^ Ian C. Bradley, The Call to Seriousness: The Evangelical Impact on the Victorians (1976) pp. 106–109 ^ Rebecca Probert, "Living in Sin", BBC History Magazine (September 2012); G. Frost, Living in Sin: Cohabiting as Husband and Wife in Nineteenth-Century England (Manchester U.P. 2008) ^ Frederick Engels (2014). The Condition of the Working-Class in England in 1844. p. 240. ISBN 9783730964859. ^ Hamish. Maxwell-Stewart, "Convict Transportation from Britain and Ireland 1615–1870", History Compass 8#11 (2010): 1221–42. ^ Martin Daunton, Progress and Poverty: An Economic and Social History of Britain 1700–1850 (1995) p 491. ^ Lionel W. Fox (1998). The English Prison and Borstal Systems. p. 46. ISBN 9780415177382. ^ S. G. Checkland, The rise of industrial society in England, 1815–1885 (1966) p 277. ^ Hamish Maxwell-Stewart, "Transportation from Britain and Ireland 1615–1870", History Compass 8#11 (2010): 1221–42. ^ R.C.K. Ensor. England 1870–1914 (1937) pp 520–21. ^ J. W. Fox, "The Modern English Prison" (1934). ^ a b c d Acton, William (1857). Prostitution Considered in its Moral, Social, and Sanitary Aspects (Reprint of the Second Edition with new biographical note ed.). London: Frank Cass (published 1972). ISBN 0-7146-2414-4. ^ a b c d e Walkowitz, Judith (1980). Prostitution and Victorian Society. Cambridge University Press. ^ a b Flanders, Judith (2014). "Prostitution". British Library. Archived from the original on 7 March 2016. ^ a b c Hamilton, Margaret (1978). "Opposition to the Contagious Diseases Acts 1864–1886". Albion. The North American Conference on British Studies. Vol.10, No. 1 (1): 14–27. doi:10.2307/4048453. JSTOR 4048453. ^ Butler, Josephine (1976). Personal Reminiscences of a Great Crusade (Hyperion Reprint ed.). Westport, Connecticut: Hyperion Reprint Press. ISBN 0-88355-257-4. ^ Nield, Keith (1973). "Introduction". Prostitution in the Victorian Age – Debates on the Issue From 19th Century Critical Journals. England: Gregg International Publishers Limited. ISBN 0576532517. ^ a b c d e f g h Swisher, Clarice, ed. Victorian England. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2000. pp. 248–250 ^ Vallely, Paul (25 April 2006). "1841: A window on Victorian Britain". The Independent. London. Archived from the original on 17 June 2015. Retrieved 10 August 2010. ^ "Illustrated London News". Iln.org.uk. Archived from the original on 7 October 2010. Retrieved 10 August 2010. ^ California Gold Rush Archived 24 November 2011 at the Wayback Machine. Robert Whaples, Wake Forest University. ^ Farwell, Byron (2009). Queen Victoria's Little Wars. Pen & Sword Books. ISBN 9781848840157. ^ "Is this what Labour's next Clause four should say?". Fabians.org.uk. Archived from the original on 22 June 2011. Retrieved 10 August 2010. ^ "1870 Education Act". Archived from the original on 11 September 2009. Retrieved 27 September 2009. Further reading General Adams, James Eli, ed. Encyclopedia of the Victorian Era (4 Vol. 2004), short essays on a wide range of topics by experts Bailey, Peter. Leisure and class in Victorian England: Rational recreation and the contest for control, 1830–1885 (Routledge, 2014). Bourne, Kenneth. The foreign policy of Victorian England, 1830-1902 (1970) online, survey plus primary documents Briggs, Asa. The Age of Improvement 1783–1867 (1959), Wide-ranging older survey emphasizing the reforms. online Cevasco, G. A. ed. The 1890s: An Encyclopedia of British Literature, Art, and Culture (1993) 736pp; short articles by experts Chadwick, Owen. The Victorian Church (2 vol 1966), covers all denominations online Clark, G. Kitson The making of Victorian England (1963). online Ensor, R. C. K. England, 1870–1914 (1936) https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.49856 online] influential scholarly survey Gregg, Pauline. A Social and Economic History of Britain: 1760–1950 (1950) online Harrison, J.F.C. Late Victorian Britain 1875–1901 (Routledge, 2013). Heffer, Simon. High Minds: The Victorians and the Birth of Modern Britain (2014), survey to 1880. Heffer, Simon. The Age of Decadence: Britain 1880 to 1914 (2017), wide-ranging scholarly survey. Heilmann, Ann, and Mark Llewellyn, eds. Neo-Victorianism: The Victorians in the Twenty-First Century, 1999–2009 (Palgrave Macmillan; 2011) 323 pages; looks at recent literary & cinematic, interest in the Victorian era, including magic, sexuality, theme parks, and the postcolonial Hilton, Boyd. A Mad, Bad, and Dangerous People?: England 1783–1846 (New Oxford History of England. 2006); in-depth scholarly survey, 784pp. Hobsbawm, Eric (1997). The Age of Capital, 1848–1875. London: Abacus. McCord, Norman and Bill Purdue. British History, 1815–1914 (2nd ed. 2007), 612 pp online, university textbook Paul, Herbert. History of Modern England, 1904-6 (5 vols) online free Perkin, Harold. The Origins of Modern English Society: 1780–1880 (1969) online Hoppen, K. Theodore. The Mid-Victorian Generation 1846–1886 (New Oxford History of England) (2000), comprehensive scholarly history excerpt and text search Roberts, Clayton and David F. Roberts. A History of England, Volume 2: 1688 to the present (2013) university textbook; 1985 edition online Somervell, D. C. English thought in the nineteenth century (1929) online Steinbach, Susie L. Understanding the Victorians: Politics, Culture and Society in Nineteenth-Century Britain (2012) excerpt and text search Swisher, Clarice, ed. Victorian England (2000) 20 excerpts from leading primary and secondary sources regarding literary, cultural, technical, political, and social themes. online free Daily life and culture Flanders, Judith. Inside the Victorian Home: A Portrait of Domestic Life in Victorian England. W.W. Norton & Company: 2004. ISBN 0-393-05209-5. Houghton, Walter E. (1957). The Victorian frame of mind, 1830–1870. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press. ISBN 978-0-300-00122-8. Mitchell, Sally. Daily Life in Victorian England. Greenwood Press: 1996. ISBN 0-313-29467-4. O'Gorman, Francis, ed. The Cambridge companion to Victorian culture (2010) Roberts, Adam Charles, ed. Victorian culture and society: the essential glossary (2003). Thompson, F. M. L. Rise of Respectable Society: A Social History of Victorian Britain, 1830–1900 (1988) Strong on family, marriage, childhood, houses, and play. Weiler, Peter. The New Liberalism: Liberal Social Theory in Great Britain, 1889–1914 (Routledge, 2016). Wilson, A. N. The Victorians. Arrow Books: 2002. ISBN 0-09-945186-7 Young, Gerard Mackworth, ed. Early Victorian England 1830-1865 (2 vol 1934) scholarly surveys of cultural history. vol 2 online Literature Altick, Richard Daniel. Victorian People and Ideas: A Companion for the Modern Reader of Victorian Literature. (1974) online free Felluga, Dino Franco, et al. The Encyclopedia of Victorian Literature (2015). Flint, Kay. The Cambridge History of Victorian Literature (2014). Horsman, Alan. The Victorian Novel (Oxford History of English Literature, 1991) Politics Aydelotte, William O. “Parties and Issues in Early Victorian England.” Journal of British Studies, 5#2 1966, pp. 95–114. online Bourne, Kenneth. The foreign policy of Victorian England, 1830–1902 (Oxford UP, 1970), contains a short narrative history and 147 "Selected documents" on pp 195–504. Boyd, Kelly and Rohan McWilliam, eds. The Victorian Studies Reader (2007) 467pp; articles and excerpts by scholars excerpts and text search Bright, J. Franck. A History of England. Period 4: Growth of Democracy: Victoria 1837–1880 (1902) online 608pp; highly detailed older political narrative A History of England: Period V. Imperial Reaction, Victoria, 1880‒1901 (1904) online Brock, M. G. "Politics at the Accession of Queen Victoria" History Today (1953) 3#5 pp 329–338 online. Brown, David, Robert Crowcroft, and Gordon Pentland, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Modern British Political History, 1800–2000 (2018) excerpt Burton, Antoinette, ed. Politics and Empire in Victorian Britain: A Reader. Palgrave Macmillan: 2001. ISBN 0-312-29335-6 Marriott, J. A. R. England Since Waterloo (1913); focus on politics and diplomacy; online Martin, Howard.Britain in the 19th Century (Challenging History series, 2000) 409pp; textbook; emphasizing politics, diplomacy and use of primary sources Trevelyan, G. M. British History in the Nineteenth Century and After (1782–1901) (1922). online very well written scholarly survey Walpole, Spencer. A History of England from the Conclusion of the Great War in 1815 (6 vol. 1878–86), very well written political narrative to 1855; online Walpole, Spencer. History of Twenty-Five Years (4 vol. 1904–1908) covers 1856–1880; online Woodward, E. L. The Age of Reform: 1815–1870 (1954) comprehensive survey online Young, G. M. "Mid-Victorianism" History Today (1951) 1#1 pp 11–17, online. Crime and punishment Auerbach, Sascha. "'Beyond the pale of mercy': Victorian penal culture, police court missionaries, and the origins of probation in England." Law and History Review 33.3 (2015): 621–663. Bailey, Victor. Policing and punishment in nineteenth century Britain (2015). Churchill, David. Crime Control and Everyday Life in the Victorian City (Oxford UP, 2018) Emsley, Clive. Crime and society in England: 1750–1900 (2013). Emsley, Clive. "Crime in 19th Century Britain." History Today 38 (1988): 40+ Emsley, Clive. The English Police: A Political and Social History (2nd ed. 1996) also published as The Great British Bobby: A History of British Policing from the 18th Century to the Present (2010)excerpt Fox, Lionel W. (1998). The English Prison and Borstal Systems. p. 46. ISBN 9780415177382. Gatrell, V. A. C. "Crime, authority and the policeman-state." in E.M.L. Thompson, ed., The Cambridge social history of Britain 1750-1950: Volume 3 (1990). 3:243-310 Hay, Douglas. "Crime and justice in eighteenth-and nineteenth-century England." Crime and Justice 2 (1980): 45–84. online Kilday, Anne-Marie. "Women and crime." Women's History, Britain 1700–1850 ed. Hannah Barker and Elaine Chalus, (Routledge, 2004) pp. 186–205. May, Margaret. "Innocence and experience: the evolution of the concept of juvenile delinquency in the mid-nineteenth century." Victorian Studies 17.1 (1973): 7–29. online Radzinowicz, Leon. A History of English Criminal Law and Its Administration from 1750 (5 vol. 1948–1976) Radzinowicz, Leon and Roger Hood The Emergence of Penal Policy in Victorian and Edwardian England (1990) Shore, Heather. "The Idea of Juvenile Crime in 19Th Century England." History Today 50.6 (2000): 21–27. Shore, Heather. "Crime, policing and punishment." in Chris Williams, ed., A companion to nineteenth-century Britain (2007): 381–395. excerpt Storch, R. D. "Crime And Justice in 19th-Century England." History Today vol 30 (Sep 1980): 32–37. Taylor, James. "White-collar crime and the law in nineteenth-century Britain." Business History (2018) 60#3 pp 343–360. Tobias, J. J. Crime and Industrial Society in the Nineteenth Century (1967) . Tobias, J.J. ed, Nineteenth-century crime: prevention and punishment (1972) primary sources. Taylor, Howard. "Rationing crime: the political economy of criminal statistics since the 1850s." Economic history review (1998) 51#3 569–590. online Historiography Burton, Antoinette. "Victorian History: Some Experiments with Syllabi." Victorian Studies 54.2 (2012): 305–311. Elton, G. R. Modern Historians on British History 1485–1945: A Critical Bibliography 1945–1969 (1969), annotated guide to 1000 history books on every major topic, plus book reviews and major scholarly articles. online Gooch, Brison D. Recent Literature on Queen Victoria's Little Wars" Victorian Studies, 17#2 (1973): 217–224 online. Goodlad, Lauren M. E. "'A Middle Class Cut into Two': Historiography and Victorian National Character." ELH 67.1 (2000): 143–178. Homans, Margaret, and Adrienne Munich, eds. Remaking Queen Victoria (Cambridge University Press, 1997) Kent, Christopher. "Victorian social history: post-Thompson, post-Foucault, postmodern." Victorian Studies (1996): 97–133. in JSTOR Mays, Kelly J. "Looking backward, looking forward: the Victorians in the rear-view mirror of future history." Victorian Studies 53.3 (2011): 445–456. Moore, D. C. "In Search of a New Past: 1820 – 1870," in Richard Schlatter, ed., Recent Views on British History: Essays on Historical Writing since 1966 (Rutgers UP, 1984), pp 255 – 298 Parry, J. P. "The State of Victorian Political History." Historical Journal (1983) 26#2 pp. 469–484 online Sandiford, Keith A. P. "The Victorians at play: Problems in historiographical methodology." Journal of Social History (1981): 271–288. in JSTOR Stansky, Peter. "British History: 1870 – 1914," in Richard Schlatter, ed., Recent Views on British History: Essays on Historical Writing since 1966 (Rutgers UP, 1984), pp. 299 – 326 Taylor, Miles. "The Bicentenary of Queen Victoria." Journal of British Studies 59.1 (2020): 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1017/jbr.2019.245 Vernon, James. "Historians and the Victorian Studies Question." Victorian Studies 47.2 (2005): 272–79 Webb, R. K. Modern England: from the 18th century to the present (1968) online widely recommended university textbook Primary sources Black, E.C. ed. British politics in the nineteenth century (1969) online Bourne, Kenneth. The foreign policy of Victorian England, 1830–1902 (Oxford UP, 1970.) pp 195–504 are 147 selected documents Hicks, Geoff, et al. eds. Documents on Conservative Foreign Policy, 1852–1878 (2013), 550 documents excerpt Temperley, Harold and L.M. Penson, eds. Foundations of British Foreign Policy: From Pitt (1792) to Salisbury (1902) (1938), 608pp of primary sources online External links books on Victorian era; online free Victorians British Library website exploring the Victorian period. Victorians.co.uk Victorian Era History Guide. Mostly-Victorian.com A collection of primary-source documents drawn from Victorian periodicals. The Victorian Dictionary The Victorian Web The Twilight City An exploration of vagrancy and streetwalkers in late Victorian London Victorians British Library history resources about the Victorian era, featuring collection material and text by Liza Picard. Timelines: Sources from history – British Library interactive Notable Victorian Scientists and Inventors Collection: "Victorian Studies" from the University of Michigan Museum of Art "What Happened During the Victorian Era?" resources from the Royal Museums Greenwich v t e United Kingdom articles History Chronology Formation Georgian era Victorian era Edwardian era First World War Interwar Second World War Civilian Military Postwar Political Social Since 1979 Political Social By topic Economic Empire Foreign relations 1814–1919 Maritime Military Geography Administrative Counties of the United Kingdom Countries of the United Kingdom Crown dependencies Overseas territories City status Towns Former colonies Physical British Isles terminology Great Britain Coastline Geology Lakes and lochs Mountains Rivers Volcanoes Resources Agriculture Energy/Renewable energy Biodiesel Coal Geothermal Hydraulic frac. Hydroelectricity Marine North Sea oil Solar Wind Fishing English Scottish Hunting Materials Flora Forestry Mining Politics Constitution Courts Devolution Elections Foreign relations Human rights Judiciary Law Law enforcement Legislation Monarchy monarchs Nationality Parliament House of Commons House of Lords Political parties Shadow Cabinet Government Cabinet list Civil service Departments Ministers list Prime Minister list Military Royal Navy Army Royal Air Force Weapons of mass destruction Economy Banks Bank of England Budget Economic geography Manufacturing Pound (currency) Science and technology Stock Exchanges (London Exchange) Taxation Telecommunications Tourism Transport British Rail Society Affordability of housing Crime Demography Drug policy Education Ethnic groups Health Immigration Innovation Languages Poverty Prostitution Public holidays Social care Social structure Culture Art Cinema Cuisine Cultural icons Identity Literature Media Music Religion Sport Symbols Theatre Stereotypes of the British World Heritage Sites Anglosphere Countries of the United Kingdom England History social timeline Geography Politics Law Economy tourism Education Health care Culture Religion Symbols Northern Ireland History Geography Politics Assembly Executive First Minister and deputy Law Economy tourism Education Health care Culture Religion Symbols Scotland History timeline Geography Politics Parliament Government First Minister Law Economy tourism Education Health care Culture Religion Symbols Wales History Geography Politics Assembly Government First Minister Law Economy tourism Education Health care Culture Religion Symbols Outline Index Category Portal v t e Queen Victoria Events Coronation Honours Hackpen White Horse Wedding Wedding dress Golden Jubilee Honours Medal Police Medal Clock Tower, Weymouth Clock Tower, Brighton Bust Diamond Jubilee Honours Medal Reign Bedchamber Crisis Prime Ministers Edward Oxford Empress of India Victorian era Victorian morality Visits to Manchester Foreign visits Funeral Mausoleum Family Albert, Prince Consort (husband) Victoria, Princess Royal (daughter) Edward VII (son) Princess Alice of the United Kingdom (daughter) Alfred, Duke of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha (son) Princess Helena of the United Kingdom (daughter) Princess Louise, Duchess of Argyll (daughter) Prince Arthur, Duke of Connaught and Strathearn (son) Prince Leopold, Duke of Albany (son) Princess Beatrice of the United Kingdom (daughter) Prince Edward, Duke of Kent and Strathearn (father) Princess Victoria of Saxe-Coburg-Saalfeld (mother) Grandchildren Royal descendants Princess Feodora of Leiningen (half-sister) Carl, 3rd Prince of Leiningen (half-brother) Early life Kensington System John Conroy Victoire Conroy Louise Lehzen Lady Flora Hastings Charlotte Percy George Davys Legitimacy Honours Places Empire Day Royal Family Order Victoria Day Victoria Day (Scotland) Victoria Cross Victoria (plant) Depictions Film Sixty Years a Queen (1913) Victoria in Dover (1936) Victoria the Great (1937) Sixty Glorious Years (1938) Victoria in Dover (1954) Mrs Brown (1997) The Young Victoria (2009) Victoria & Abdul (2017) The Black Prince (2017) Dolittle (2020) Television Happy and Glorious (1952) Victoria Regina (1961) The Young Victoria (1963) Victoria & Albert (2001) Looking for Victoria (2003) Royal Upstairs Downstairs (2011) Victoria (2016–2019) Stage Victoria and Merrie England (1897) Victoria Regina (1934) I and Albert (1972) Statues and Memorials List of statues London Memorial Statue Square Leeds St Helens Lancaster Bristol Weymouth Chester Reading Liverpool Birmingham Birkenhead Dundee Balmoral cairns Guernsey Isle of Man Valletta Statue Gate Winnipeg Montreal Square Victoria, British Columbia Toronto Regina Bangalore Hong Kong Kolkata Visakhapatnam Penang Sydney Building Square Adelaide Brisbane Melbourne Christchurch Poetry "The Widow at Windsor" (1892) "Recessional" (1897) Songs Victoria Choral Songs Stamps British Penny Black VR official Penny Blue Two penny blue Penny Red Embossed stamps Halfpenny Rose Red Three Halfpence Red Penny Venetian Red Penny Lilac Lilac and Green Issue Jubilee Issue Colonial Chalon head Canada 12d black Canada 2c Large Queen Ceylon Dull Rose India Inverted Head 4 annas Malta Halfpenny Yellow Mauritius "Post Office" stamps Related Osborne House Queen Victoria's journals John Brown Abdul Karim Pets Dash Diamond Crown Authority control GND: 7503447-5 LCCN: sh85056823 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Victorian_era&oldid=996490376" Categories: Victorian era Historical eras History of the United Kingdom by period History of England by period 19th century in England 19th century in the United Kingdom Hidden categories: Webarchive template other archives Webarchive template wayback links Pages containing links to subscription-only content CS1: Julian–Gregorian uncertainty CS1: long volume value Wikipedia indefinitely semi-protected pages Articles with short description Short description matches Wikidata Use British English from June 2013 Use dmy dates from October 2020 All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from December 2020 Articles with unsourced statements from January 2017 Commons category link is on Wikidata Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read View source View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version In other projects Wikimedia Commons Languages Afrikaans العربية Asturianu Azərbaycanca বাংলা Bân-lâm-gú Беларуская Български Català Чӑвашла Čeština Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά Español Esperanto Euskara فارسی Français Frysk Gaeilge Galego 한국어 Հայերեն Hrvatski Bahasa Indonesia Íslenska Italiano עברית ქართული Latina മലയാളം Bahasa Melayu Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Norsk nynorsk پنجابی Polski Português Română Русиньскый Русский සිංහල Simple English Slovenčina کوردی Српски / srpski Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски Suomi Svenska தமிழ் ไทย Türkçe Українська اردو 吴语 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 26 December 2020, at 22:36 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2944 ---- Marriage in ancient Rome - Wikipedia Marriage in ancient Rome From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Roman couple joining hands; the bride's belt may show the knot symbolizing that the husband was "belted and bound" to her, which he was to untie in their bed (4th century sarcophagus)[1] Marriage in ancient Rome (conubium) was a strictly monogamous institution: a Roman citizen by law could have only one spouse at a time. The practice of monogamy distinguished the Greeks and Romans from other ancient civilizations, in which elite males typically had multiple wives. Greco-Roman monogamy may have arisen from the egalitarianism of the democratic and republican political systems of the city-states. It is one aspect of ancient Roman culture that was embraced by early Christianity, which in turn perpetuated it as an ideal in later Western culture.[2] Marriage had mythical precedents, starting with the abduction of the Sabine Women, which may reflect the archaic custom of bride abduction. Romulus and his band of male immigrants were rejected conubium, the legal right to intermarriage, from the Sabines. According to Livy, Romulus and his men abducted the Sabine maidens, but promised them an honorable marriage, in which they would enjoy the benefits of property, citizenship, and children. These three benefits seem to define the purpose of marriage in ancient Rome.[3] The word matrimonium, the root for the English word "matrimony", defined the institution's main function. Involving the mater (mother), it carried with it the implication of the man taking a woman in marriage to have children. This was the idea conventionally shared by Romans as to the purpose of marriage, which would be to produce legitimate children; citizens producing new citizens.[3] Consortium is a word used for the sharing of property, usually used in a technical sense for the property held by heirs, but could also be used in the context of marriage. Such usage was commonly seen in Christian writings. However, the sharing of water and fire (aquae et ignis communiciatio) was symbolically more important. It refers to the sharing of natural resources. Worldly possessions transferred automatically from the wife to the husband in archaic times, whereas the classical marriage kept the wife's property separate.[3] In order for the union of a man and woman to be legitimate, there needed to be consent legally and morally. Both parties, or their fathers had to consent to the marriage in order for the marriage to happen. During the reign of Augustus the father had to give a valid reason for not consenting to the marriage.[4] Contents 1 Conventions of Roman marriage 1.1 Marriage laws 1.2 Wedding ceremonies 1.3 Dowry 1.4 Divorce 1.5 Remarriage 1.6 Adultery 2 Same-sex marriage 3 Other forms of unions 3.1 Concubinage 3.2 Contubernium 4 See also 5 References 6 Bibliography 7 Further reading 8 External links Conventions of Roman marriage[edit] Detail of a gold glass medallion with a portrait of a family, from Alexandria (Roman Egypt), 3rd–4th century (Brescia, Museo di Santa Giulia)[5] Under early Roman law, the oldest living male was the head of a family, or pater familias, and had absolute authority (patria potestas) over his children and, to a lesser extent, his wife. His household was thus understood to be under his manus (literally, "hand").[6] He had the right and duty to seek a good and useful match for his children, and might arrange a child's betrothal long before he or she came of age.[7] To further the interests of their birth families, sons of the elite should follow their fathers into public life.[8] and daughters should marry into respectable families. If a daughter could prove the proposed husband to be of bad character, she could legitimately refuse the match.[9] The age of lawful consent to a marriage was 12 for girls and 14 for boys.[10] Most Roman women seem to have married in their late teens to early twenties, but noble women married younger than those of the lower classes, and an aristocratic girl was expected to be virgin until her first marriage.[11] Roman mores idealised a married daughter's relationship to her father as deferential and obedient, even at her husband's expense.[12] "Deference" was not always absolute. After arranging his daughter's first two marriages, Marcus Tullius Cicero disapproved — rightly, as it turned out — of her choice to marry Dolabella, but found himself unable to prevent it.[13] A daughter kept her own birth-family name (nomen) for life; and although children usually took the father's name, some might take their mother's family name as part of theirs.[14] In the early Empire, the legal standing of daughters differed little, if at all, from that of sons; either could inherit a share of the family estate if their father died intestate.[15] Marriage laws[edit] Early Roman law recognised three kinds of marriage: confarreatio, symbolized by the sharing of spelt bread (panis farreus);[16] coemptio, "by purchase"; and by usus (habitual cohabitation). Patricians always married by confarreatio, while plebeians married by coemptio or usus: in the latter, a woman could avoid her husband's legal control simply by being absent from their shared home for three consecutive nights, once a year. Among elite families of the early Republic, manus marriage was the norm;[17] the bride passed from the manus ("hand") of her father to the manus of her husband, remaining under one or another form of male potestas (power).[18] Manus marriage was an institutionally unequal relationship. By the time of Julius Caesar, it was largely abandoned in favour of "free" marriage;[19] when a wife moved into her husband's home, she remained under her father's lawful authority; but she did not conduct her daily life under his direct scrutiny.[20] and her husband had no legal power over her.[21] This was one of the factors in the independence Roman women enjoyed, relative to those of many other ancient cultures and up to the modern period:[22] Free marriage usually involved two citizens of equal or near-equal status, or a citizen and a person who held Latin rights. In the later Imperial period and with official permission, soldier-citizens and non-citizens could marry. So total was the law's separation of property that gifts between spouses were recognised as conditional loans; if a couple divorced or even lived apart, the giver could reclaim the gift.[23] Inscription (CIL 14.5326) from Ostia Antica recording a decree that newlyweds are to pray and sacrifice before the altar to the imperial couple Antoninus Pius and Faustina as exemplifying Concordia, marital harmony[24] Following the collapse of the Republic, laws pertaining to marriage, parenting, and adultery were part of Augustus' program to restore the mos maiorum (traditional social norms), while consolidating his power as princeps and paterfamilias of the Roman state.[25] Marriage and remarriage had become less frequent; and the citizen birth-rate had fallen, particularly among the wealthier, more leisured classes. Augustan law pertaining to marriage and family life encouraged marriage and having children, and punished adultery as a crime.[26] The new legislation formalized and enforced what had been considered a traditional, moral duty to family and the State; all men between 25 and 60 years of age, and all women between 20 and 50 were to marry and have children, or pay extra tax in proportion to their wealth. Members of the upper classes thus had most to lose. Citizens who had already produced three children, and freed persons who had produced four, were exempt. Marriages between senators and freed women, and slaves and citizens, were declared legally void. Children born to such liaisons were illegitimate, non-citizen and unable to inherit.[27] A married woman who bore three children or more could be granted legal independence under the ius liberorum.[28] These laws were badly received; they were modified in AD 9 by the Lex Papia Poppaea;[clarification needed] eventually they were nearly all repealed or fell into disuse under Constantine and later emperors, including Justinian.[26] Wedding ceremonies[edit] Main article: Weddings in Ancient Rome A groom encourages his demure bride while a servant looks on (wall painting, Casa della Farnesina, ca. 19 BCE) A confarreatio wedding ceremony was a rare event, reserved for the highest echelons of Rome's elite. The Flamen Dialis and Pontifex Maximus presided, with ten witnesses present, and the bride and bridegroom shared a cake of spelt (in Latin far or panis farreus), hence the rite's name.[29] A more typical upper-middle class wedding in the classical period was less prestigious than a confarreatio, but could be equally lavish. It would have been carefully planned. Sometimes the bride and groom exchanged gifts before the wedding.[3] The lighting of a sacred torch in honor of Ceres was part of the celebration, in hopes of imparting fertility upon the couple[30] A wedding sacrifice was also offered, with a sow being the most likely victim.[31][32] The day after the wedding, the husband would hold a dinner party, and the bride made an offering to the Lares and other domestic deities of her new home.[3][33] Dowry[edit] Heracles and Omphale, Roman fresco, Pompeian Fourth Style (45–79 AD), Naples National Archaeological Museum, Italy Dowry (Latin dos, a gift) was the payment made by a wife's family to her husband, nominally to cover the expenses of their household. It was more customary than compulsory. Ancient papyrus texts show that dowries typically included land and slaves but could also include jewelry, toiletries, mirrors, and clothing. While a marriage lasted, the dowry was the husband's property but his use of it was restricted; if the marriage ended through divorce, it was returned to either the wife or her family.[34][35] If the husband committed offenses which led to divorce, he lost claim to any share in the dowry. If a wife was blameless for the ending of her marriage, the dowry was restored to her. If a wife or husband with children initiated a divorce, their partner could claim a share of dowry on behalf of the children, to meet their needs and later inheritance.[36] A dowry of dos recepticia was one in which agreements were made in advance about its disposal and recovery. A dowry of dos profecticia was one given by the bride's father or her paterfamilias; it could be recovered by the donor or by the divorced woman herself. A dowry of dos adventicia was more flexible; it might be given by the wife, though it came from her father, and used to settle a debt incurred by the husband. If she divorced, a wife could reclaim this dowry; if she died, the husband kept it.[37] Divorce[edit] Lawful divorce was relatively informal; the wife simply took back her dowry and left her husband's house. Roman men had always held the right to divorce their wives; a pater familias could order the divorce of any couple under his manus.[38] According to the historian Valerius Maximus, divorces were taking place by 604 BCE or earlier, and the early Republican law code of the Twelve Tables provided for it. Divorce was socially acceptable if carried out within social norms (mos maiorum). By the time of Cicero and Julius Caesar, divorce was relatively common and "shame-free," the subject of gossip rather than a social disgrace.[39] Valerius says that Lucius Annius was disapproved of because he divorced his wife without consulting his friends; that is, he undertook the action for his own purposes and without considering its effects on his social network (amicitia and clientela). The censors of 307 BCE thus expelled him from the Senate for moral turpitude. Elsewhere, however, it is claimed that the first divorce took place only in 230 BCE, at which time Dionysius of Halicarnassus notes[40] that "Spurius Carvilius, a man of distinction, was the first to divorce his wife" on grounds of infertility. This was most likely the Spurius Carvilius Maximus Ruga who was consul in 234 and 228 BCE. The evidence is confused.[41] A man could also divorce his wife for adultery, drunkenness, or making copies of the household keys.[42] Around the 2nd century, married women gained the right to divorce their husbands.[43] Divorce by either party severed the lawful family alliance that had been formed through the marriage; and remarriage might create an entirely new set of economically or politically useful alliances. Among the elite, husbands and wives might remarry several times.[42] Only one spouse's will was required for any divorce, even if the divorced party was not informed. A spouse who had entered marriage sane and healthy, but became incapable of sound judgment (insane) was not competent and could not divorce their partner; they could be divorced without their knowledge or legal notice. Divorce, like marriage, was considered a family affair. It was discussed and agreed in private, in an informal family gathering of the parties most affected; the husband, wife, and senior members of both families. No public record was kept of the proceedings. Official registration of divorce was not required until 449 CE.[43] Remarriage[edit] The frequency of remarriage among the elite was high. Speedy remarriage was not unusual, and perhaps even customary, for aristocratic Romans after the death of a spouse.[44] While no formal waiting period was dictated for a widower, it was customary for a woman to remain in mourning for ten months before remarrying.[45] The duration may allow for pregnancy: if a woman had become pregnant just before her husband's death, the period of ten months ensures that no question of paternity, which might affect the child's social status and inheritance, would attach to the birth.[46] No law prohibited pregnant women from marrying, and there are well-known instances: Augustus married Livia when she was carrying her former husband's child, and the College of Pontiffs ruled that it was permissible as long as the child's father was determined first. Livia's previous husband even attended the wedding.[47] Because elite marriages often occurred for reasons of politics or property, a widow or divorcée with assets in these areas faced few obstacles to remarrying. She was far more likely to be legally emancipated than a first-time bride, and to have a say in the choice of husband. The marriages of Fulvia, who commanded troops during the last civil war of the Republic and who was the first Roman woman to have her face on a coin, are thought to indicate her own political sympathies and ambitions: she was married first to the popularist champion Clodius Pulcher, who was murdered in the street after a long feud with Cicero; then to Scribonius Curio, a figure of less ideological certitude who at the time of his death had come over to Julius Caesar; and finally to Mark Antony, the last opponent to the republican oligarchs and to Rome's future first emperor. Most wives were encouraged to remarry after either the death of the husband or a divorce; and a high death rate, low average life expectancy and high divorce rate meant frequent or multiple remarriages.[48] Since children were expected in marriage, each spouse usually brought at least one child to the new marriage. Remarriages thus created a new blending of the family in ancient Roman society, where children were influenced by stepparents and some instances where stepmothers were younger than their stepchildren.[48] Ancient physicians believed that a woman was liable to get very sick if she was deprived of sexual activity and it could even lead to a woman getting ‘'hysteric uterine constriction.’'[49] There was even legislation passed during the rule of Augustus that required widows and widowers to remarry to be able to fully inherit from people outside of their immediate family.[49] Adultery[edit] Dido embracing Aeneas, from a Roman fresco in the House of Citharist in Pompeii, Italy; Pompeian Third Style (10 BC – 45 AD) Adultery was a sexual offense committed by a man with a woman who was neither his wife nor a permissible partner such as a prostitute or slave.[50] A married man committed adultery mainly when his female partner was another man's wife or unmarried daughter.[51] The punishment varied at different periods of Roman history and depending on the circumstances. Although prohibitions against adultery and harsh punishments are mentioned during the Republic (509–27 BC), historical sources suggest that they were regarded as archaic survivals, and should not be interpreted as accurate representations of behavior. Adultery was normally considered a private matter for families to deal with, not a serious criminal offense requiring the attention of the courts,[52][53] though there were some cases when adultery and sexual transgressions by women had been brought to the aediles for judgment.[54] According to Cato (2nd century BC), a husband had an ancient right (ius) to kill his wife if he caught her in the act of adultery. The existence of this "right" has been questioned; if it did exist, it was a matter of custom and not statute law,[55] and probably only applied to those in the manus form of marriage, which had become vanishingly rare by the Late Republic (147–27 BC), when a married woman always remained legally a part of her own family. No source records the justified killing of a woman for adultery by either a father or husband during the Republic.[56] Adultery was sufficient grounds for divorce, however, and if the wife was at fault, the wronged husband got to keep a portion of her dowry, though not much more than if he had repudiated her for less serious forms of misconduct.[57] As part of the moral legislation of Augustus in 18 BC, the Lex Iulia de adulteriis ("Julian Law concerning acts of adultery") was directed at punishing married women who engaged in extra-marital affairs. The implementation of punishment was the responsibility of the paterfamilias, the male head of household to whose legal and moral authority the adulterous party was subject. If a father discovered that his married daughter was committing adultery in either his own house or the house of his son-in-law, he was entitled to kill both the woman and her lover; if he killed only one of the adulterers, he could be charged with murder. While advertising the father's power, the extremity of the sentence seems to have led to its judicious implementation, since cases in which this sentence was carried out are infrequently recorded — most notoriously, by Augustus himself against his own daughter.[58] A wronged husband was entitled to kill his wife's lover if the man was either a slave or infamis, a person who, though perhaps technically free, was excluded from the normal legal protections extended to Roman citizens. Among the infames were convicted criminals, entertainers such as actors and dancers, prostitutes and pimps, and gladiators.[59] He was not allowed to kill his wife, who was not under his legal authority.[57] If he chose to kill the lover, however, the husband was required to divorce his wife within three days and to have her formally charged with adultery.[60] If a husband was aware of the affair and did nothing, he himself could be charged with pandering (lenocinium, from leno, "pimp").[61] If no death penalty was carried out and charges for adultery were brought, both the married woman and her lover were subject to criminal penalties, usually including the confiscation of one-half of the adulterer's property, along with one third of the woman's property and half her dowry; any property brought by a wife to the marriage or gained during marriage normally remained in her possession following a divorce. A woman convicted of adultery was barred from remarrying.[50] Scholars have often assumed that the Lex Iulia was meant to address a virulent outbreak of adultery in the Late Republic. An androcentric perspective in the early 20th century held that the Lex Iulia had been "a very necessary check upon the growing independence and recklessness of women."[62] A gynocentric view in the late 20th to early 21st century saw love affairs as a way for the intelligent, independent women of the elite to form emotionally meaningful relationships outside marriages arranged for political purposes.[63] It is possible, however, that no such epidemic of adultery even existed; the law should perhaps be understood not as addressing a real problem that threatened society, but as one of the instruments of social control exercised by Augustus that cast the state, and by extension himself, in the role of paterfamilias to all Rome.[64] Humiliating or violent punishments for adultery are prescribed by law and described by poets, but are absent in the works of Roman historians or the letters of Cicero: "The men who people the pages of Cicero and Tacitus do not burst into their wives' bedrooms to take violent revenge (even when license was granted by the law)."[65] Augustus himself, however, had frequent recourse to his moral laws in choosing to banish potential enemies and rivals from Rome, and the effect of the legislation seems to have been primarily political.[66][67] Same-sex marriage[edit] Main article: Homosexuality in ancient Rome It is unknown whether or not same-sex marriages were legal in Rome. The sources that refer to same-sex marriages could refer to concubinage. The emperor Nero is known to have married a male slave named Sporus. Nero castrated Sporus, and treated him like a woman. Nero did legitimately marry Sporus, even assigning him a Dowry. Nero also married a slave named Pythagoras. However, sources disagree on whether or not those marriages were legitimate.[clarification needed] In Juvenal's Satire No. 2, two men have a homosexual relationship, with one man taking the role of the woman and wearing the bridal garb. However, it is uncertain whether this reflected a contemporary practice, or was merely a work of fiction.[68] There are notable examples of same-sex relationships in Rome. The emperor Elagabalus is said to have married either an enslaved chariot-driver named Hierocles, or a Smyrnaean athlete named Zoticus. Elagabalus was named wife, mistress, and queen. It is unlikely Elagabalus legitimately married.[clarification needed] There is evidence of same-sex marriages from the constitution of Constantine and Constans in the Codex Theodosianus. The Codex states, [c]um vir nubit in feminam viro porrecturam quod cupiat, ubi sexus perdidit locum, ubi scelus est id, quod non proficit scire, ubi venus mutatur in alteram formam, ubi amor quaeritur nec videtur, iubemus insurgere leges, armari iura gladio ultore, ut exquisitis poenis subdantur infames, qui sunt vel qui futuri sunt rei. This quote refers to a man marrying in the manner of a bride. The context is unclear: it could be describing either a same-sex relationship, or a law banning same-sex relationships. Other forms of unions[edit] Concubinage[edit] Main article: Concubinatus A concubinatus (Latin for "concubinage" – see also concubina, "concubine", considered milder than paelex, and concubinus, "bridegroom") was an institution of quasi-marriage between Roman citizens who for various reasons did not want to enter into a full marriage.[69][70] The institution was often found in unbalanced couples, where one of the members belonged to a higher social class or where one of the two was freed and the other one was freeborn.[71] However it differed from a contubernium, where at least one of the partners was a slave (see below).[72][73] Contubernium[edit] Main article: Contubernium The relationship between a free citizen and a slave or between slaves was known as contubernium.[72] The term describes a wide range of situations, from simple sexual slavery to quasi-marriage. For instance, according to Suetonius, Caenis, a slave and secretary of Antonia Minor, was Vespasian's wife "in all but name", until her death in AD 74. It was also not uncommon for slaves to create family-like unions, allowed but not protected by the law. See also[edit] Ancient Greek wedding customs Sexuality in ancient Rome References[edit] ^ Cinctus vinctusque, according to Festus 55 (edition of Lindsay); Karen K. Hersch, The Roman Wedding: Ritual and Meaning in Antiquity (Cambridge University Press, 2010), pp. 101, 110, 211 . ^ Scheidel, Walter (2006) "Population and Demography," Princeton/Stanford Working Papers in Classics, p. 7. ^ a b c d e Treggiari, Susan (1991). Roman Marriage. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-814890-9 ^ Johnston, Harold Whetstone (2012). The Private Life of the Romans. Chicago: Robt. O. Law Co., Printers And Binders. ^ Jás Elsner (2007). "The Changing Nature of Roman Art and the Art Historical Problem of Style," in Eva R. Hoffbeans (ed), Late Antique and Medieval Art of the Medieval World, 11–18. Oxford, Malden & Carlton: Blackwell Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4051-2071-5, p. 17, Figure 1.3 on p. 18. ^ Bruce W. Frier and Thomas A.J. McGinn, A Casebook on Roman Family Law (Oxford University Press, 2004), p. 20. ^ Frier, A Casebook on Roman Family Law, p. 66. ^ Beryl Rawson, "The Roman Family," in The Family in Ancient Rome: New Perspectives (Cornell University Press, 1986), p. 18. ^ Rawson, "The Roman Family", p. 21. ^ Beryl Rawson, "The Roman Family in Italy" (Oxford University Press, 1999), p. 21. ^ Judith P. Hallett, Fathers and Daughters in Roman Society: Women and the Elite Family (Princeton University Press, 1984), 142. ^ Hallett, 139. ^ Rawson, The Roman Family, p. 21. ^ Rawson, "The Roman Family," p. 18. ^ Frier, A Casebook on Roman Family Law, pp. 19–20. ^ Karen K. Hersch (24 May 2010). The Roman Wedding: Ritual and Meaning in Antiquity. Cambridge University Press. pp. 26–. ISBN 978-0-521-12427-0. ^ The late Imperial Roman jurist Gaius writes of manus marriage as something that used to happen. Frier and McGinn, Casebook, p. 54. ^ Frier and McGinn, Casebook, p. 53. ^ David Johnston, Roman Law in Context (Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp. 33–34. ^ "If adults sons or daughters and their children had lived in the same household as the paterfamilias," notes Rawson, "they may well have found the constant awareness of his powers and position a great strain" ("The Roman Family," p. 15). ^ Frier and McGinn, Casebook, pp. 19–20. ^ Eva Cantarella, Pandora's Daughters: The Role and Status of Women in Greek and Roman Antiquity (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987), pp. 140–141 ^ Frier and McGinn, Casebook, pp. 49, 52, citing Ulpian, D. 24.1.3.1. If the donor died first, however, the gift to the surviving spouse was valid. ^ Paul Zanker and Björn C. Ewald, Living with Myths: The Imagery of Sarcophagi (Oxford University Press, 2012), p. 190; Maud Gleason, "Making Space for Bicultural Identity: Herodes Atticus Commemorates Regilla," in Local Knowledge and Microidentities in the Imperial Greek World (Cambridge University Press, 2010), p. 138. ^ Edwards, pp. 34ff., 41–42 et passim; and "Unspeakable Professions: Public Performance and Prostitution in Ancient Rome," in Roman Sexualities (Princeton University Press, 1997), pp. 67, 89–90 et passim. ^ a b Lefkowitz, p. 102. ^ Frank, Richard I., "Augustus' Legislation on Marriage and Children," California Studies in Classical Antiquity, Vol. 8, 1975, pp. 44–45 University of California Press DOI: 10.2307/25010681  – via JSTOR (subscription required) ^ Thomas, "The Division of the Sexes," p. 133. ^ Goran Lind (23 July 2008). Common Law Marriage : A Legal Institution for Cohabitation: A Legal Institution for Cohabitation. Oxford University Press, USA. pp. 38–. ISBN 978-0-19-971053-9. ^ "The most auspicious wood for wedding torches came from the spina alba, the may tree, which bore many fruits and hence symbolised fertility": Spaeth, Barbette Stanley, The Roman goddess Ceres, University of Texas Press, 1996. ISBN 0-292-77693-4. Spaeth is citing Pliny the Elder, Historia Naturalis, 30.75. ^ Varro, Rerum Rusticarum, 2.4.10 describes the sacrifice of a pig as "a worthy mark of weddings" because "our women, and especially nurses" call the female genitalia porcus (pig). Ceres may have been included in the sacrificial dedication, because she is closely identified with Tellus and, as Ceres legifera (law-bearer), she "bears the laws" of marriage; see Spaeth, 1996, pp. 5, 6, 44–47 ^ Servius, On Vergil's Aeneid, 4.58, "implies that Ceres established the laws for weddings as well as for other aspects of civilized life." For more on Roman attitudes to marriage and sexuality, Ceres' role at marriages and the ideal of a "chaste married life" for Roman matrons, see Staples, Ariadne, From Good Goddess to vestal virgins: sex and category in Roman religion, Routledge, 1998, pp. 84–93. ^ Orr, D. G., Roman domestic religion: the evidence of the household shrines, pp. 15–16 in Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, II, 16, 2, Berlin, 1978, 1557‑91. ^ Gardner, p. 97. ^ Gardner, p. 102. ^ Treggiari, Susan. (1991). "Divorce Roman Style: How easy and how Frequent was it?" In Marriage, Divorce, and Children in Ancient Rome, eds. Beryl Rawson, pp. 31–46. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-814918-2. ^ Gardner, p. 105. ^ He had no power over daughters given in manus marriage to another; see Treggiari, Susan, "Divorce Roman Style: How easy and how Frequent was it?" In Rawson, B., (editor), Marriage, Divorce, and Children in Ancient Rome, Oxford University Press, 1991, p.37. ISBN 0-19-814918-2 ^ Suzanne Dixon, "From Ceremonial to Sexualities: A Survey of Scholarship on Roman Marriage" in A Companion to Families in the Greek and Roman Worlds (Wiley-Blackwell, 2011), p. 248. ^ Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Antiquitates Romanae, 2.25 ^ Aulus Gellius (Noctes Atticae 4.3.1) places the divorce in 227 BCE, but fudges the date and his sources elsewhere. ^ a b Holland, Barbara and Yerkes, Lane (March 1998) "The long good-bye", Smithsonian 28, no. 12: 86. ^ a b Treggiari, Susan, "Divorce Roman Style: How easy and how Frequent was it?" in Rawson, Beryl (Editor) Marriage, Divorce, and Children in Ancient Rome, Oxford University Press, 1991, pp. 37, 38 , ISBN 0-19-814918-2 ^ Susan Treggiari, Roman Marriage: Iusti Coniuges from the Time of Cicero to the Time of Ulpian (Oxford University Press, 1991), pp. 258–259, 500–502 et passim. ^ Karen K. Hersch, The Roman Wedding: Ritual and Meaning in Antiquity, p. 48. ^ In Roman inclusive counting, a pregnancy was counted as lasting ten months. ^ Eva Cantarella, "Marriage and Sexuality in Republican Rome: A Roman Conjugal Love Story," in The Sleep of Reason: Erotic Experience and Sexual Ethics in Ancient Greece and Rome (University of Chicago Press, 2002), p. 276. ^ a b Bradley, K. R. (1991) "Remarriage and the Structure of the Upper-Class Roman Family." in Marriage, Divorce, and Children in Ancient Rome, eds. Beryl Rawson, pp. 79–98. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ^ a b Corbier, Mireille (1991) "Divorce and Adoption as Roman Familial Strategies." in Marriage, Divorce, and Children in Ancient Rome, eds. Beryl Rawson, pp. 47–78. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ^ a b McGinn, Thomas A. J. (1991). "Concubinage and the Lex Iulia on Adultery". Transactions of the American Philological Association. 121: 335–375 (341–342). doi:10.2307/284457. JSTOR 284457. ^ Nussbaum, p. 305. ^ Edwards, pp. 34–35 ^ Nussbaum, p. 305, noting that custom "allowed much latitude for personal negotiation and gradual social change." ^ Susan Dixon, The Roman Family (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992), p. 79. ^ Dixon, The Roman Family, p. 202. ^ Edwards, p. 41. ^ a b Edwards, p. 38. ^ Edwards, pp. 61ff. ^ Edwards, p. 38, citing the jurist Paulus, Sententiae 2.26.4. ^ Edwards, pp. 38–39. ^ Edwards, p. 39, citing Ulpian, Digest 48.5.2.2; 48.5.2.6. ^ P.E. Corbett, The Roman Law of Marriage (1930), as cited by Edwards, p. 35; see also discussion in Nussbaum, pp. 305–306. ^ Beryl Rawson, The Family in Ancient Rome (Cornell University Press, 1987), p. 27, as cited by Edwards, pp. 35–36. ^ Edwards, pp. 34–36. ^ Edwards, pp. 55–56. ^ Edwards, p. 62 ^ Elaine Fantham, "Stuprum: Public Attitudes and Penalties for Sexual Offences in Republican Rome," in Roman Readings: Roman Response to Greek Literature from Plautus to Statius and Quintilian (Walter de Gruyter, 2011), p. 142. ^ Gellérfi, Gergő (2020). Nubit amicus: Same-sex weddingsin Imperial Rome. Hungary: University of Szeged. ^ Stocquart 1907, p. 304. ^ Treggiari 1981, p. 58, note #42: "Marriage existed if there was affectio maritalis on the part of both parties. For the difficulty of determining whether a relationship was marriage, see for example Cic. de Or. 1.183, Quint. Decl. 247 (Ritter 11.15), Dig. 23.2.24, Mod. 24.1.32.13, Ulp.; 39.5.31 pr., Pap." ^ Rawson 1974, p. 288: "Concubinage seems to have been most frequent amongst freed persons." ^ a b Stocquart 1907, p. 305: "From matrimonium, we should distinguish; First, concubinatus, a union authorized under Augustus from the leges Julia et Papia, between persons of unequal condition, provided the man had no uxor. The concubina was neither uxor nor pellex, but uxoris loco. The children, issue of such a union, are neither legitimi nor spurii, but naturales. (Cod. 5, 27.) Second, contubernium is the perfectly regular and valid relation between a free man and a slave, or between two slaves. Through the civil law, it produced all the effects arising from the natural law. ^ Treggiari 1981, p. 53. Bibliography[edit] Edwards, Catharine (1993). The Politics of Immorality in Ancient Rome. Cambridge University Press. Gardner, Jane F. (1991). Women in Roman Law and Society. Indiana University Press. ISBN 0-253-20635-9. Lefkowitz, Mary R. and Fant, Maureen B. (2005). Women's Life in Greece and Rome. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 0-8018-4474-6.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) Nussbaum, Martha C. (2002). "The Incomplete Feminism of Musonius Rufus, Platonist, Stoic, and Roman". The Sleep of Reason: Erotic Experience and Sexual Ethics in Ancient Greece and Rome. University of Chicago Press. Stocquart, Emile (March 1907). Sherman, Charles Phineas (ed.). Translated by Bierkan, Andrew T. "Marriage in Roman law". Yale Law Journal. 16 (5): 303–327. doi:10.2307/785389. Retrieved 2020-09-15. Treggiari, Susan (1981). "Contubernales". Phoenix. CAC. 35 (1): 42–69. doi:10.2307/1087137. Rawson, Beryl (1974). "Roman Concubinage and Other De Facto Marriages". Transactions of the American Philological Association. JHUP. 104: 279–305. doi:10.2307/2936094. Further reading[edit] Corbier, Mireille. 1991. "Divorce and Adoption as Roman Familial Strategies", In Marriage, Divorce, and Children in Ancient Rome, eds. Beryl Rawson, 47–78. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-814918-2 Bradley, K.R. 1991. "Remarriage and the Structure of the Upper-Class Roman Family", In Marriage, Divorce, and Children in Ancient Rome, eds. Beryl Rawson, 79–98. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-814918-2 Holland, Barbara, and Lane Yerkes. "The long good-bye." Smithsonian 28, no. 12 (March 1998):86. Parkin, Tim G. 2003. Old Age in the Roman World: A Cultural and Social History, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 0-8018-7128-X Saller, Richard P. 1994. Patriarchy, Property, and Death in the Roman Family, New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-32603-6 The Age of Marriage in Ancient Rome by Arnold A. Lelis, William A. Percy, Beert C. Verstraete. The Edwin Mellen Press, 2003. ISBN 0-7734-6665-7 Debating Roman Demography Walter Scheidel (ed.) Brill Academic Publishers, 2000. ISBN 90-04-11525-0 Patriarchy, Property and Death in the Roman Family (Cambridge Studies in Population, Economy and Society in Past Time) by Richard P. Saller. Cambridge University Press, 1996. ISBN 0-521-59978-4 I Clavdia II: Women in Roman Art and Society. Edited by Diana E. E. Kleiner and Susan B. Matheson Yale University Art Gallery. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2000. Kiefer, O. (12 November 2012). Sexual Life In Ancient Rome. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-136-18198-6. External links[edit] The Age of Marriage In Ancient Rome v t e Ancient Rome topics Outline Timeline History Foundation Kingdom overthrow Republic Empire History Pax Romana Principate Dominate Western Empire fall historiography of the fall Byzantine Empire decline fall Constitution History Kingdom Republic Empire Late Empire Senate Legislative assemblies Curiate Centuriate Tribal Plebeian Executive magistrates SPQR Law Twelve Tables Mos maiorum Citizenship Auctoritas Imperium Status Litigation Government Curia Forum Cursus honorum Collegiality Emperor Legatus Dux Officium Prefect Vicarius Vigintisexviri Lictor Magister militum Imperator Princeps senatus Pontifex Maximus Augustus Caesar Tetrarch Optimates Populares Province Magistrates Ordinary Consul Censor Praetor Tribune Tribune of the Plebs Military tribune Quaestor Aedile Promagistrate Governor Extraordinary Rex Interrex Dictator Magister Equitum Decemviri Consular Tribune Triumvir Military History Borders Establishment Structure Campaigns Political control Strategy Engineering Frontiers and fortifications castra Technology Army Legion Infantry tactics Personal equipment Siege engines Navy Auxiliaries Decorations and punishments Hippika gymnasia Economy Agriculture Deforestation Commerce Finance Currency Republican currency Imperial currency Culture Architecture Art Bathing Calendar Clothing Cosmetics Cuisine Hairstyles Education Literature Music Mythology Religion Deities Romanization Roman people Sexuality Theatre Wine Society Patricians Plebs Conflict of the Orders Secessio plebis Equites Gens Tribes Assembly Naming conventions Demography Women Marriage Adoption Slavery Bagaudae Technology Amphitheatres Aqueducts Bridges Circuses Civil engineering Concrete Domes Metallurgy Numerals Roads Temples Theatres Sanitation Thermae Latin History Alphabet Versions Old Classical Vulgar Late Medieval Renaissance New Contemporary Ecclesiastical Romance languages Writers Latin Aelius Donatus Ammianus Marcellinus Appuleius Asconius Pedianus Augustine Aurelius Victor Ausonius Boëthius Caesar Catullus Cassiodorus Censorinus Cicero Claudian Columella Cornelius Nepos Ennius Eutropius Fabius Pictor Sextus Pompeius Festus Rufus Festus Florus Frontinus Fronto Fulgentius Gellius Horace Hydatius Hyginus Jerome Jordanes Julius Paulus Justin Juvenal Lactantius Livy Lucan Lucretius Macrobius Marcellus Empiricus Marcus Aurelius Manilius Martial Nicolaus Damascenus Nonius Marcellus Obsequens Orosius Ovid Petronius Phaedrus Plautus Pliny the Elder Pliny the Younger Pomponius Mela Priscian Propertius Quadrigarius Quintilian Quintus Curtius Rufus Sallust Seneca the Elder Seneca the Younger Servius Sidonius Apollinaris Silius Italicus Statius Suetonius Symmachus Tacitus Terence Tertullian Tibullus Valerius Antias Valerius Maximus Varro Velleius Paterculus Verrius Flaccus Vergil Vitruvius Greek Aelian Aëtius of Amida Appian Arrian Cassius Dio Diodorus Siculus Diogenes Laërtius Dionysius of Halicarnassus Dioscorides Eusebius of Caesaria Galen Herodian Josephus Julian Libanius Lucian Pausanias Philostratus Phlegon of Tralles Photius Plutarch Polyaenus Polybius Porphyrius Priscus Procopius Simplicius of Cilicia Sozomen Stephanus Byzantinus Strabo Themistius Theodoret Zonaras Zosimus Major cities Alexandria Antioch Aquileia Berytus Bononia Carthage Constantinopolis Eboracum Leptis Magna Londinium Lugdunum Lutetia Mediolanum Pompeii Ravenna Roma Smyrna Vindobona Volubilis Lists and other topics Cities and towns Climate Consuls Dictators Distinguished women Dynasties Emperors Generals Gentes Geographers Institutions Laws Legacy Legions Magistri equitum Nomina Pontifices Maximi Praetors Quaestors Tribunes Roman–Iranian relations Wars and battles Civil wars and revolts Fiction Films Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marriage_in_ancient_Rome&oldid=992477326" Categories: Ancient Roman culture Marriage in ancient Rome Marriage by culture Hidden categories: Subscription required using via Pages containing links to subscription-only content Articles containing Latin-language text Wikipedia articles needing clarification from April 2017 Wikipedia articles needing clarification from November 2020 CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Català Deutsch Eesti Español Français Հայերեն Italiano Nederlands Português Русский Українська Edit links This page was last edited on 5 December 2020, at 13:37 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement en-wikipedia-org-2969 ---- Basilicata - Wikipedia Basilicata From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Region of Italy Region of Italy Basilicata Lucania Region of Italy Flag Coat of arms Country Italy Capital Potenza Government  • President Vito Bardi (FI) Area  • Total 9,995 km2 (3,859 sq mi) Population (3 October 2012)  • Total 575,902  • Density 58/km2 (150/sq mi) Demonym(s) English: Lucanian Italian: Lucano (man) Italian: Lucana (woman) Time zone UTC+1 (CET)  • Summer (DST) UTC+2 (CEST) ISO 3166 code IT-77 GDP (nominal) €12.6 billion (2018)[1] GDP per capita €22,200 (2018)[2] HDI (2018) 0.853[3] very high · 17th of 21 NUTS Region ITF Website www.regione.basilicata.it Basilicata (UK: /bəˌsɪlɪˈkɑːtə/,[4] US: /-ˌzɪl-/,[5] Italian: [baziliˈkaːta]), also known by its ancient name Lucania (/luːˈkeɪniə/, also US: /luːˈkɑːnjə/,[6][7] Italian: [luˈkaːnja]), is an administrative region in Southern Italy, bordering on Campania to the west, Apulia to the north and east, and Calabria to the south. It has two coastlines: a 30-km stretch on the Tyrrhenian Sea between Campania and Calabria, and a longer coastline along the Gulf of Taranto between Calabria and Apulia. The region can be thought of as the "instep" of Italy, with Calabria functioning as the "toe" and Apulia the "heel". The region covers about 10,000 km2 (3,900 sq mi). In 2010 the population was slightly under 600,000. The regional capital is Potenza. The region is divided into two provinces: Potenza and Matera.[8][9] Its inhabitants are generally known as Lucanians, although this ethnonym should properly refer to ancient Lucania's populations. Contents 1 Etymology 2 Geography 3 History 3.1 Prehistory 3.2 Ancient history 3.3 Middle Ages 3.4 Modern and contemporary ages 4 Demographics 5 Government and politics 6 Administrative divisions 7 Economy 8 Tourism 8.1 Archeological sites 8.2 Religious buildings 8.3 Castles 8.4 Other sights 9 Culture 9.1 Music 9.2 Cinema 9.3 Cuisine 10 References 11 External links Etymology[edit] The name probably derives from "basilikos" (Greek: βασιλικός), which refers to the basileus, the Byzantine emperor, who ruled the region for 200 years, from 536/552 to 571/590 and from 879 to 1059. Others argue that the name may refer to the Basilica of Acerenza, which held judicial power in the Middle Ages. During the Greek and Roman Ages, Basilicata was known as Lucania. This was possibly derived from "leukos" (Greek: λευκός), meaning "white", from "lykos" (Greek: λύκος), meaning "wolf", or from Latin "lūcus", meaning "sacred wood". Geography[edit] Dolomiti lucane and Pietrapertosa Basilicata covers an extensive part of the southern Apennine Mountains, between the Ofanto river in the north and the Pollino massif in the south. It is bordered on the east by a large part of the Bradano river depression, which is traversed by numerous streams and declines to the southeastern coastal plains on the Ionian Sea. The region also has a short coastline to the southwest on the Tyrrhenian Sea side of the peninsula. Basilicata is the most mountainous region in the south of Italy, with 47% of its area of 9,992 km2 (3,858 sq mi) covered by mountains. Of the remaining area, 45% is hilly, and 8% is made up of plains. Notable mountains and ranges include the Pollino massif, the Dolomiti lucane, Monte Vulture, Monte Alpi, Monte Carmine, Monti Li Foj and Toppa Pizzuta. Badlands in Aliano Geological features of the region include the volcanic formations of Monte Vulture, and the seismic faults in the Melfi and Potenza areas in the north, and around Pollino in the south. Much of the region was devastated in the 1857 Basilicata earthquake. More recently, the 1980 Irpinia earthquake destroyed many towns in the northwest of the region. The mountainous terrain combined with weak rock and soil types makes landslides prevalent. The lithological structure of the substratum and its chaotic tectonic deformation predispose the slope to landslides, and this problem is compounded by the lack of forested land. In common with many another Mediterranean region, Basilicata was once rich in forests, but they were largely felled and made barren during the time of Roman rule. The variable climate is influenced by three coastlines (Adriatic, Ionian and Tyrrhenian) and the complexity of the region's physical features. In general, the climate is continental in the mountains and Mediterranean along the coasts. History[edit] Prehistory[edit] The first traces of human presence in Basilicata date to the late Paleolithic, with findings of Homo erectus. Late Cenozoic fossils, found at Venosa and other locations, include elephants, rhinoceros and species now extinct such as a saber-toothed cat of the genus Machairodus. Examples of rock art from the Mesolithic have been discovered near Filiano. From the fifth millennium, people stopped living in caves and built settlements of huts up to the rivers leading to the interior (Tolve, Tricarico, Aliano, Melfi, Metaponto). In this period, anatomically modern humans lived by cultivating cereals and animal husbandry (Bovinae and Caprinae). Chalcolithic sites include the grottoes of Latronico and the funerary findings of the Cervaro grotto near Lagonegro. The first known stable market center of the Apennine culture on the sea, consisting of huts on the promontory of Capo la Timpa [it], near to Maratea, dates to the Bronze Age. The first indigenous Iron Age communities lived in large villages in plateaus located at the borders of the plains and the rivers, in places fitting their breeding and agricultural activities. Such settlements include that of Anglona, located between the fertile valleys of Agri and Sinni, of Siris and, on the coast of the Ionian Sea, of Incoronata-San Teodoro. The first presence of Greek colonists, coming from the Greek islands and Anatolia, date from the late eighth century BC. There are virtually no traces of survival of the 11th–8th century BC archaeological sites of the settlements (aside from a necropolis at Castelluccio on the coast of the Tyrrhenian Sea): this was perhaps caused by the increasing presence of Greek colonies, which changed the balance of the trades. Ancient history[edit] The ancient region of Lucania In ancient historical times the region was originally known as Lucania, named for the Lucani, an Oscan-speaking population from central Italy. Their name might be derived from Greek leukos meaning "white", lykos ("gray wolf"), or Latin lucus ("sacred grove"). Or more probably Lucania, as much as the Lucius forename (praenomen) derives from the Latin word Lux (gen. lucis), meaning "light" (