Late Latin - Wikipedia





	
	

	
	

	Late Latin

	
		From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

		

		

		
		

		Jump to navigation
		Jump to search
		Written Latin of late antiquity




	Late Latin
	Latinitas serior
	Augustine of Hippo (354–430), Late Latin author

	Native to	(Western) Roman Empire, Ostrogothic Kingdom, Gallic Empire
	Region	Mare Nostrum region
	Era	3rd to 6th centuries; developed into Medieval Latin
	Language family
	Indo-European
	
Italic	Latino-Faliscan	Latin	Late Latin









	Early forms
	Old Latin
	Classical Latin






	Writing system
	Latin
	Official status
	Official language in
	Both Roman Empires (Later replaced with Koine Greek in the East)
	Regulated by	Schools of grammar and rhetoric
	Language codes
	ISO 639-3	–
	Glottolog	late1252
	The Late-Latin speaking world, AD 271



Late Latin (Latin: Latinitas serior) is the scholarly name for the written Latin of late antiquity.[1] English dictionary definitions of Late Latin date this period from the 3rd to the 6th centuries AD,[2][3] and continuing into the 7th century in the Iberian Peninsula.[1] This somewhat ambiguously defined version of Latin was used between the eras of Classical Latin and Medieval Latin. There is no scholarly consensus about exactly when Classical Latin should end or Medieval Latin should begin. However, Late Latin is characterized (with variations and disputes) by an identifiable style.

Being a written language, Late Latin is not the same as Vulgar Latin. The latter served as ancestor of the Romance languages. Although Late Latin reflects an upsurge of the use of Vulgar Latin vocabulary and constructs, it remains largely classical in its overall features, depending on the author who uses it. Some Late Latin writings are more literary and classical, but others are more inclined to the vernacular. Also, Late Latin is not identical to Christian patristic Latin, used in the theological writings of the early Christian fathers. While Christian writings used a subset of Late Latin, pagans also wrote extensively in Late Latin, especially in the early part of the period.

Late Latin formed when large numbers of non-Latin-speaking peoples on the borders of the empire were being subsumed and assimilated, and the rise of Christianity was introducing a heightened divisiveness in Roman society, creating a greater need for a standard language for communicating between different socioeconomic registers and widely separated regions of the sprawling empire. A new and more universal speech evolved from the main elements: Classical Latin, Christian Latin, which featured sermo humilis (ordinary speech) in which the people were to be addressed,[4] and all the various dialects of Vulgar Latin.[5] The linguist Antoine Meillet wrote, "Without the exterior appearance of the language being much modified, Latin became in the course of the imperial epoch a new language",[6] and, "Serving as some sort of lingua franca to a large empire, Latin tended to become simpler, to keep above all what it had of the ordinary".[7]


Contents


	1 Philological constructs
	1.1 Late and post-classical Latin
	1.2 Imperial Latin
	1.3 Christian, patristic, vulgate and ancient Latin
	1.4 Low Latin
	1.5 Through the death of Boethius



	2 See also
	3 Notes
	4 References
	5 Further reading
	6 External links





Philological constructs[edit]

Late and post-classical Latin[edit]

Neither Late Latin nor Late Antiquity are modern terms or concepts; neither are they ancient; their origin remains obscure. A notice in Harper's New Monthly Magazine of the publication of Andrews' Freund's Lexicon of the Latin Language in 1850 mentions that the dictionary divides Latin into ante-classic, quite classic, Ciceronian, Augustan, post-Augustan and post-classic or late Latin,[8][9] which indicates the term already was in professional use by English classicists in the early 19th century. Instances of English vernacular use of the term may also be found from the 18th century. The term Late Antiquity meaning post-classical and pre-medieval had currency in English well before then.


Imperial Latin[edit]

Wilhelm Sigismund Teuffel's first edition (1870) of History of Roman Literature defined an early period, the Golden Age, the Silver Age and then goes on to define other ages first by dynasty and then by century (see under Classical Latin). In subsequent editions he subsumed all periods under three headings: the First Period (Old Latin), the Second Period (the Golden Age) and the Third Period, "the Imperial Age", subdivided into the Silver Age, the 2nd century, and Centuries 3–6 together, which was a recognition of Late Latin, as he sometimes refers to the writings of those times as "late." Imperial Latin went on into English literature; Fowler's History of Roman Literature mentions it in 1903.[10]

There are, however, insoluble problems with the beginning and end of Imperial Latin. Politically the excluded Augustan Period is the paradigm of imperiality, and yet the style cannot be bundled with either the Silver Age or with Late Latin. Moreover, in 6th century Italy, the Roman Empire no longer existed; the rule of Gothic kings prevailed. Subsequently, the term Imperial Latin was dropped by historians of Latin literature, although it may be seen in marginal works. The Silver Age was extended a century and the final four centuries represent Late Latin.


Christian, patristic, vulgate and ancient Latin[edit]

Main articles: Ecclesiastical Latin, Vulgate, Vetus Latina, Patrologia Latina, and Patristics

Low Latin[edit]

  
St. Gildas, one of a number of Late Latin writers to promulgate an excidium or ruina Britanniae because of moral turpitude.



Low Latin is a vague and often pejorative term that might refer to any post-classical Latin from Late Latin through Renaissance Latin depending on the author.[clarification needed] Its origins are obscure but the Latin expression media et infima Latinitas sprang into public notice in 1678 in the title of a Glossary (by today's standards a dictionary) by Charles du Fresne, sieur du Cange. The multi-volume set had many editions and expansions by other authors subsequently. The title varies somewhat; most commonly used was Glossarium Mediae et Infimae Latinitatis. It has been translated by expressions of widely different meanings. The uncertainty is understanding what media, "middle", and infima, "low", mean in this context.

The media is securely connected to Medieval Latin by Cange's own terminology expounded in the Praefatio,[11] such as scriptores mediae aetatis, "writers of the middle age." Cange's Glossary takes words from authors ranging from the Christian period (Late Latin) to the Renaissance, dipping into the classical period if a word originated there. Either media et infima Latinitas refers to one age, which must be the middle age covering the entire post-classical range, or it refers to two consecutive periods, infima Latinitas and media Latinitas. Both interpretations have their adherents.


  
Edward Gibbon, English historian who espoused the concept of a decline of the Roman Empire resulting in its fall.



In the former case the infimae appears extraneous; it recognizes the corruptio of the corrupta Latinitas Cange said his Glossary covered.[12] The two-period case postulates a second unity of style, infima Latinitas, translated into English as "Low Latin" (which in the one-period case would be identical to media Latinitas). Cange in the glossarial part of his Glossary identifies some words as being used by purioris Latinitatis scriptores, such as Cicero (of the Golden Age). He has already said in the Preface that he rejects the ages scheme used by some: Golden Age, Silver Age, Brass Age, Iron Age. A second category are the inferioris Latinitatis scriptores, such as Apuleius (Silver Age). The third and main category are the infimae Latinitatis scriptores, who must be post-classical; that is, Late Latin, unless they are also medieval. His failure to state which authors are low leaves the issue unresolved.

He does however give some idea of the source of his infima, which is a classical word, "lowest", of which the comparative degree is inferior, "lower." In the Preface he opposes the style of the scriptores aevi inferioris (Silver Age) to the elegantes sermones, "elegant speech", the high and low styles of Latinitas defined by the classical authors. Apparently Cange was basing his low style on sermo humilis,[13] the simplified speech devised by Late Latin Christian writers to address the ordinary people. Humilis (humble, humility) means "low", "of the ground". The Christian writers were not interested in the elegant speech of the best or classical Latin, which belonged to their aristocratic pagan opponents. Instead they preferred a humbler style lower in correctness, so that they might better deliver the gospel to the vulgus or "common people."

Low Latin in this view is the Latin of the two periods in which it has the least degree of purity, or is most corrupt. By corrupt du Cange only meant that the language had resorted to non-classical vocabulary and constructs from various sources, but his choice of words was unfortunate. It allowed the "corruption" to extend to other aspects of society, providing fuel for the fires of religious (Catholic vs. Protestant) and class (conservative vs. revolutionary) conflict. Low Latin passed from the heirs of the Italian renaissance to the new philologists of the northern and Germanic climes, where it became a different concept.

In Britain Gildas' view that Britain fell to the Anglo-Saxons because it was morally slack was already well known to the scholarly world. The northern Protestants now worked a role reversal: if the language was "corrupt" it must be symptomatic of a corrupt society, which indubitably led to a "decline and fall", as Edward Gibbon put it, of imperial society. Writers taking this line relied heavily on the scandalous behavior of the Julio-Claudian dynasty and the bad emperors reported by Tacitus and other writers and later by the secret history of Procopius, who hated his royal employers to such a degree that he could not contain himself about their real methods and way of life any longer. They, however, spoke elegant Latin. The Protestants changed the scenario to fit their ideology that the church needed to be purified of corruption. For example, Baron Bielfeld, a Prussian officer and comparative Latinist, characterised the low in Low Latin, which he saw as medieval Latin, as follows:


‹ The template below (Columns) is being considered for deletion. See templates for discussion to help reach a consensus. ›

	
French: Le quatrieme âge de la langue Latine, est celui où pendant le reste du moyen âge & les premiers siecles des temps modernes, le Latin tomba successivement dans une telle décadence, que ce ne fut plus qu’un jargon barbare. C’est au Latin de cet âge qu’on a donné le nom de basse Latinité ; […] en effet […] tellement corrompu, altéré, mêlé d’expressions étrangeres […] Et que pouvoit-on espérer pour la langue Latine d’un temps où des Nations Barbares pénétrerent dans toute l’Europe, & sur-tout en Italie, où l’Empire d’Orient étoit gouverné par des imbécilles, où les moeurs étoient abominables, où les arts & les sciences étoient comme anéantis, où les Prêtres & les Moines, &c. étoient les seuls lettrés, & néanmoins les plus ignorans & les plus ineptes personnages du monde. Aussi faut-il ranger sous ces temps ténébreux ce Latin absurde qu’on nommoit lingua Ecclesiastica, & qu’on ne sauroit lire sans dégoût.[15]		
The fourth age of the Latin tongue is that of the remainder of the middle age, and the 1st centuries of modern times, during which the language fell by degrees into so great a decadency, that it became nothing better than a barbarous jargon. It is the style of these times that is given the name of Low Latin. ... What indeed could be expected from this language, at a time when the barbarians had taken possession of Europe, but especially of Italy; when the empire of the east was governed by idiots; when there was a total corruption of morals; when the priests and monks were the only men of letters, and were at the same time the most ignorant and futile mortals in the world. Under these times of darkness, we must, therefore, rank that Latin, which is called lingua ecclesiastica, and which we cannot read without disgust.[14]

— The Elements of Universal Erudition, containing an Analytical Abrigement of the Sciences, Polite Arts and Belles Lettres


As 'Low Latin' tends to be muddled with Vulgar Latin, Late Latin and Medieval Latin and has unfortunate extensions of meaning into the sphere of socioeconomics, it has gone out of use by the mainstream philologists of Latin literature. A few writers on the periphery still mention it, influenced by the dictionaries and classic writings of former times.


  
Tertullian



  
Cyprian



As Teuffel's scheme of the Golden Age and the Silver Age is the generally accepted one, the canonical list of authors should begin just after the end of the Silver Age, regardless of what 3rd century event is cited as the beginning; otherwise there are gaps. Teuffel gave the end of the Silver Age as the death of Hadrian at 138 AD. His classification of styles left a century between that event and his final period, the 3rd–6th centuries BC, which was in other systems being considered Late Antiquity.

Starting with Charles Thomas Crutwell's A History of Roman Literature from the Earliest Period to the Death of Marcus Aurelius, which first came out in 1877, English literary historians have included the spare century in Silver Latin. Accordingly, the latter ends with the death of the last of the five good emperors in 180 AD. Other authors use other events, such as the end of the Nervan–Antonine dynasty in 192 AD or later events. A good round date of 200 AD gives a canonical list of nearly no overlap.

The transition between Late Latin and Medieval Latin is by no means as easy to assess. Taking that media et infima Latinitas was one style, Mantello in a recent handbook asserts of "the Latin used in the middle ages" that it is "here interpreted broadly to include late antiquity and therefore to extend from c. AD 200 to 1500."[16] Although recognizing "late antiquity" he does not recognize Late Latin. It did not exist and Medieval Latin began directly at 200 BC. In this view all differences from Classical Latin are bundled as though they evolved through a single continuous style.

Of the two-style interpretations the Late Latin period of Erich Auerbach and others is one of the shortest: "In the first half of the 6th century, which witnessed the beginning and end of Ostrogoth rule in Italy, Latin literature becomes medieval. Boethius was the last 'ancient' author and the role of Rome as the center of the ancient world, as communis patria, was at an end."[17] In essence, the lingua franca of classical vestiges was doomed when Italy was overrun by the Goths, but its momentum carried it one lifetime further, ending with the death of Boethius in AD 524.

Not everyone agrees that the lingua franca came to an end with the fall of Rome, but argue that it continued and became the language of the reinstituted Carolingian Empire (predecessor of the Holy Roman Empire) under Charlemagne. Toward the end of his reign his administration conducted some language reforms. The first recognition that Late Latin could not be understood by the masses and therefore was not a lingua franca was the decrees of 813 AD by synods at Mainz, Rheims Tours that from then on preaching was to be done in a language more understandable to the people, which was stated by Tours Canon 17 as rustica Romana lingua, identified as proto-Romance, the descendant of Vulgar Latin.[18] Late Latin as defined by Meillet was at an end; however, Pucci's Harrington's Mediaeval Latin sets the end of Late Latin when Romance began to be written, "Latin retired to the cloister" and "Romanitas lived on only in the fiction of the Holy Roman Empire."[19] The final date given by those authors is AD 900.


Through the death of Boethius[edit]

  
Constantine the Great



  
Ausonius



  
Ambrose



	Domitius Ulpianus (170 AD – 228 AD), jurist, imperial officer
	Julius Paulus Prudentissimus (2nd & 3rd centuries AD), jurist, imperial officer
	Aelius Marcianus (2nd & 3rd centuries AD), jurist
	Herennius Modestinus (3rd century AD), jurist
	Censorinus (3rd century AD), historian, essayist
	Quintus Gargilius Martialis (3rd century AD), horticulturalist, pharmacologist
	Gaius Asinius Quadratus (3rd century AD), historian
	Quintus Septimius Florens Tertullianus (AD 160 - 220), "the father of Latin Christianity", polemicist against heresy
	Thascius Caecilius Cyprianus (AD 200 - 258), converted rhetorician, bishop of Carthage, martyr, saint
	Novatianus (200 AD – 258 AD), theologian, rival pope, excommunicant
	Quintus Serenus Sammonicus (2nd century AD, early 3rd century AD), scholar, educator
	Commodianus (3rd century AD), poet, Christian educator
	Lucius Caelius Firmianus Lactantius (AD 240 - 320), converted rhetorician, scholar, Christian apologist and educator
	Ammianus Marcellinus (4th century AD), soldier, imperial officer, historian
	Claudius Claudianus (4th century AD), court poet
	Gaius Julius Solinus (3rd or 4th century AD), topical writer
	Nonius Marcellus (3rd or 4th century AD), topical writer
	Marcus Aurelius Olympius Nemesianus (fl. 283 AD), poet
	Aquila Romanus (3rd century AD), rhetorician
	Eumenius of Autun (3rd century AD), educator
	Aelius Festus Aphthonius (3rd or 4th century AD), grammarian
	Calcidius (4th century AD), translator
	Gaius Marius Victorinus (4th century AD), converted philosopher
	Arnobius of Sicca (4th century), Christian apologist
	Constantine I (272 AD – 337 AD), first Christian emperor
	Nazarius (4th century AD), rhetorician, educator
	Gaius Julius Victor (4th century AD), rhetorician
	Gaius Vettius Aquilinus Juvencus (4th century AD), Christian poet
	Nonius Marcellus (3rd and 4th centuries AD), grammarian, lexicographer
	Julius Firmicus Maternus (4th century AD), converted advocate, pagan and Christian writer
	Aelius Donatus (4th century AD), grammarian, rhetorician, educator
	Palladius (408/431 AD – 457/461 AD), saint, first bishop of Ireland
	Sextus Aurelius Victor (AD 320 - 390), imperial officer, historian
	Eutropius (4th century AD), imperial officer, historian
	Aemilius Magnus Arborius (4th century AD), poet, educator, friend of the imperial family
	Decimius Magnus Ausonius (ca. 310 AD – 395 AD), poet, rhetorician, educator, friend of the imperial family
	Claudius Mamertinus (4th century AD), imperial officer, panegyricist, embezzler
	Hilarius (4th century AD), converted neo-Platonist, theologian, bishop of Poitiers, saint
	Ambrosius (337/340 AD – 397 AD), theologian, Bishop of Milan, saint
	Lucifer (d. 370/371 AD), theologian, Bishop of Sardinia
	Priscillianus (d. 385 AD), theologian, first person executed as a heretic
	Flavius Sosipater Charisius (4th century AD), grammarian
	Diomedes Grammaticus (4th century AD), grammarian
	Postumius Rufus Festus Avienus (4th century AD), imperial officer, poet, translator
	Priscianus Caesariensis (fl. AD 500), grammarian


See also[edit]

	Decline of the Roman Empire
	Panegyrici Latini, a collection of 3rd to 4th century panegyrics; their language is however predominantly classical (Golden Age) Latin base, derived from an education heavy on Cicero, mixed with a large number of Silver Age usages and a small number of Late and Vulgar terms.


Notes[edit]


	^ a b Roberts (1996), p.537.

	^ "Late Latin". Webster's Third New International Dictionary. Volume II, H to R. Chicago: Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. 1961.

	^ "Late Latin". The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (3rd ed.). Boston, New York, London: Houghton Mifflin Company.


	^ Auerbach (1958), Chapter 1, Sermo Humilis.

	^ Harrington, Karl Pomeroy; Pucci, Joseph Michael (1997). Mediaeval Latin (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. p. 67. ISBN 0-226-31713-7. The combination of features specific to Vulgar Latin and Ecclesiastical Latin had the effect, then, of transforming the language by the fourth century into something of extraordinary vigor.


	^ Meillet (1928), p.270: "Sans que l'aspect extérieur de la langue se soit beaucoup modifié, le Latin est devenu au cours de l'epoque impériale une langue nouvelle}",

	^ Meillet (1928), p. 273: "Servant en quelque sorte de lingua franca à un grand empire, le Latin a tendu à se simplifier, à garder surtout ce qu'il avait de banal".

	^ "Harper's New Monthly Magazine, Monthly Record of Current Events". I. 1850: 705. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)


	^ Ethan Allen Andrews; William Freund (1851). A Copious and Critical Latin-English Lexicon: Founded on the Larger Latin-German Lexicon of Dr. William Freund; with Additions and Corrections from the Lexicons of Gesner, Facciolati, Scheller, Georges, Etc. Harper & Brothers.


	^ Fowler, Harold North (1903). A History of Roman Literature. New York: D. Appleton and Co. p. 3. The third or Imperial Period lasts from 14 A. D. to the beginning of the Middle Ages.


	^ Du Cange, Charles du Fresne;  et al. (1840). "Præfatio LXII". Glossarium mediæ et infimæ Latinitatis. Volume 1. Paris: Firmin Didot Fratres. p. 41. Retrieved 1 June 2011.


	^ Du Cange, Charles du Fresne;  et al. (1840). "Præfatio LXIII". Glossarium mediæ et infimæ Latinitatis. Volume 1. Paris: Firmin Didot Fratres. pp. 41–42. Retrieved 1 June 2011.


	^ https://sermohumilis.com

	^ von Bielfeld, Jakob Friedrich (1770). The Elements of Universal Erudition, containing an Analytical Abrigement of the Sciences, Polite Arts and Belles Lettres. III. Translated by Hooper, W. London: G. Scott. p. 345.


	^ The text was originally published in French, the court language of Prussia at the time:
von Bielfeld, Jakob Friedrich (1767). Les premiers traits de l'érudition universelle : ou, analyse abregée de toutes les sciences, des beaux-arts et des belles-lettres. III. Leiden: Luchtmans. p. 317.


	^ Mantello, FAC (1999) [1996]. "Part I".  In Mantello, Frank Anthony Carl; Rigg, A. G (eds.). Medieval Latin: an introduction and bibliographical guide. Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press. p. 3.


	^ Auerbach (1965), p.85.

	^ Uytfanghe, Marc Van (1996). "The consciousness of a linguistic dichotomy (Latin-Romance) in Carolingian Gaul: the contradictions of the sources and of their interpretation".  In Wright, Roger (ed.). Latin and the Romance languages in the early Middle Ages. University Park, Penn.: Pennsylvania State University Press. pp. 114–120. ISBN 0-271-01569-1.


	^ Harrington, Karl Pomeroy; Pucci, Joseph Michael (1997). Mediaeval Latin (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. p. 196. ISBN 0-226-31713-7.





References[edit]

	Auerbach, Erich (1965) [1958]. Literary Language and its Public in Late Latin Antiquity and in the Middle Ages. Bollingen Series LXXIV. Trans. Ralph Mannheim. Pantheon Books.

	Meillet, Antoine (1928). Esquisse d'une Histoire de la Langue Latine (in French). Paris: Hachette.

	Roberts, Michael (1996). "The Latin Literature of Late Antiquity".  In Anthony, Frank; Mantello, Carl; Rigg, A.G (eds.). Medieval Latin: an introduction and bibliographical guide. Catholic University of America Press. pp. 537–546.

	Teuffel, Wilhelm Sigismund; Schwabe, Ludwig (1892). Teuffel's History of Roman Literature Revised and Enlarged. II, The Imperial Period. Trans. George C.W. Warr (from the 5th German ed.). London: George Bell & Sons.



Further reading[edit]

	Adams, J. N., Nigel Vincent, and Valerie Knight. 2016. Early and Late Latin: Continuity Or Change? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
	Courcelle, Pierre. 1969. Late Latin Writers and Their Greek Sources. Translated by Harry Wedeck. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
	Elsner, Jaś, and Jesús Hernández Lobato. 2017. The Poetics of Late Latin Literature. New York: Oxford University Press.
	Langslow, D. R. 2006. The Latin Alexander Trallianus: The Text and Transmission of a Late Latin Medical Book. London: Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies.
	Löfstedt, Einar. 1959. Late Latin. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
	Wright, Roger. 1982. Late Latin and Early Romance in Spain and Carolingian France. Liverpool, UK: Francis Cairns.
	--. 2003. A sociophilological study of Late Latin. Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols.


External links[edit]

	Library resources about 
 Late Latin 

	
	Online books
	Resources in your library
	Resources in other libraries




	"Christian Latin" (in Latin). The Latin Library. Retrieved 12 October 2009.

	Du Cange, Charles du Fresne (2009) [1710]. Glossarium ad scriptores mediae et infimae Latinitatis. Francofurti ad Moenum: apud Johannem Adamum Jungium, CAMENA - Corpus Automatum Multiplex Electorum Neolatinitatis Auctorum, University of Heidelberg.

	"du Cange, le Glossarium: en ligne". École nationale des Chartres. 2008. Retrieved 10 October 2009.

	"Glossarium Mediae et Infimae Latinitatis". Documenta Catholica Omnia. 2006. Retrieved 10 October 2009.



		v
	t
	e


Ages of Latin

		
until 75 BC
Old Latin



	
75 BC – 200 AD
Classical Latin



	
200–900
Late Latin



	
900–1300
Medieval Latin



	
1300–1500
Renaissance Latin



	
1500–1900
New Latin



	
1900–present
Contemporary Latin







	
	History of Latin
	Latin literature
	Vulgar Latin
	Ecclesiastical Latin
	Romance languages
	Latino sine flexione
	Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum
	Hiberno-Latin
	Judeo-Latin







	
	v
	t
	e


Ancient Rome topics

	
	Outline
	Timeline




	History	
	
	Foundation
	Kingdom
	overthrow


	Republic




	Empire	
	History
	Pax Romana
	Principate
	Dominate
	Western Empire
	fall
	historiography of the fall


	Byzantine Empire
	decline
	fall









	Constitution	
	History
	Kingdom
	Republic
	Empire
	Late Empire
	Senate
	Legislative assemblies
	Curiate
	Centuriate
	Tribal
	Plebeian


	Executive magistrates
	SPQR




	Law	
	Twelve Tables
	Mos maiorum
	Citizenship
	Auctoritas
	Imperium
	Status
	Litigation




	Government	
	Curia
	Forum
	Cursus honorum
	Collegiality
	Emperor
	Legatus
	Dux
	Officium
	Prefect
	Vicarius
	Vigintisexviri
	Lictor
	Magister militum
	Imperator
	Princeps senatus
	Pontifex Maximus
	Augustus
	Caesar
	Tetrarch
	Optimates
	Populares
	Province




	Magistrates	
	Ordinary	
	Consul
	Censor
	Praetor
	Tribune
	Tribune of the Plebs
	Military tribune
	Quaestor
	Aedile
	Promagistrate
	Governor




	Extraordinary	
	Rex
	Interrex
	Dictator
	Magister Equitum
	Decemviri
	Consular Tribune
	Triumvir







	Military	
	History
	Borders
	Establishment
	Structure
	Campaigns
	Political control
	Strategy
	Engineering
	Frontiers and fortifications
	castra


	Technology
	Army
	Legion
	Infantry tactics
	Personal equipment
	Siege engines


	Navy
	Auxiliaries
	Decorations and punishments
	Hippika gymnasia




	Economy	
	Agriculture
	Deforestation
	Commerce
	Finance
	Currency
	Republican currency
	Imperial currency




	Culture	
	Architecture
	Art
	Bathing
	Calendar
	Clothing
	Cosmetics
	Cuisine
	Hairstyles
	Education
	Literature
	Music
	Mythology
	Religion
	Deities


	Romanization
	Roman people
	Sexuality
	Theatre
	Wine




	Society	
	Patricians
	Plebs
	Conflict of the Orders
	Secessio plebis
	Equites
	Gens
	Tribes
	Assembly


	Naming conventions
	Demography
	Women
	Marriage
	Adoption
	Slavery
	Bagaudae




	Technology	
	Amphitheatres
	Aqueducts
	Bridges
	Circuses
	Civil engineering
	Concrete
	Domes
	Metallurgy
	Numerals
	Roads
	Temples
	Theatres
	Sanitation
	Thermae




	Latin	
	History
	Alphabet
	Versions
	Old
	Classical
	Vulgar
	Late
	Medieval
	Renaissance
	New
	Contemporary
	Ecclesiastical


	Romance languages




	Writers	
	Latin	
	Aelius Donatus
	Ammianus Marcellinus
	Appuleius
	Asconius Pedianus
	Augustine
	Aurelius Victor
	Ausonius
	Boëthius
	Caesar
	Catullus
	Cassiodorus
	Censorinus
	Cicero
	Claudian
	Columella
	Cornelius Nepos
	Ennius
	Eutropius
	Fabius Pictor
	Sextus Pompeius Festus
	Rufus Festus
	Florus
	Frontinus
	Fronto
	Fulgentius
	Gellius
	Horace
	Hydatius
	Hyginus
	Jerome
	Jordanes
	Julius Paulus
	Justin
	Juvenal
	Lactantius
	Livy
	Lucan
	Lucretius
	Macrobius
	Marcellus Empiricus
	Marcus Aurelius
	Manilius
	Martial
	Nicolaus Damascenus
	Nonius Marcellus
	Obsequens
	Orosius
	Ovid
	Petronius
	Phaedrus
	Plautus
	Pliny the Elder
	Pliny the Younger
	Pomponius Mela
	Priscian
	Propertius
	Quadrigarius
	Quintilian
	Quintus Curtius Rufus
	Sallust
	Seneca the Elder
	Seneca the Younger
	Servius
	Sidonius Apollinaris
	Silius Italicus
	Statius
	Suetonius
	Symmachus
	Tacitus
	Terence
	Tertullian
	Tibullus
	Valerius Antias
	Valerius Maximus
	Varro
	Velleius Paterculus
	Verrius Flaccus
	Vergil
	Vitruvius




	Greek	
	Aelian
	Aëtius of Amida
	Appian
	Arrian
	Cassius Dio
	Diodorus Siculus
	Diogenes Laërtius
	Dionysius of Halicarnassus
	Dioscorides
	Eusebius of Caesaria
	Galen
	Herodian
	Josephus
	Julian
	Libanius
	Lucian
	Pausanias
	Philostratus
	Phlegon of Tralles
	Photius
	Plutarch
	Polyaenus
	Polybius
	Porphyrius
	Priscus
	Procopius
	Simplicius of Cilicia
	Sozomen
	Stephanus Byzantinus
	Strabo
	Themistius
	Theodoret
	Zonaras
	Zosimus







	Major cities	
	Alexandria
	Antioch
	Aquileia
	Berytus
	Bononia
	Carthage
	Constantinopolis
	Eboracum
	Leptis Magna
	Londinium
	Lugdunum
	Lutetia
	Mediolanum
	Pompeii
	Ravenna
	Roma
	Smyrna
	Vindobona
	Volubilis




	Lists and other
topics	
	Cities and towns
	Climate
	Consuls
	Dictators
	Distinguished women
	Dynasties
	Emperors
	Generals
	Gentes
	Geographers
	Institutions
	Laws
	Legacy
	Legions
	Magistri equitum
	Nomina
	Pontifices Maximi
	Praetors
	Quaestors
	Tribunes
	Roman–Iranian relations
	Wars and battles
	Civil wars and revolts




	Fiction
	Films







	Languages portal










Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Late_Latin&oldid=995062586"


		Categories: 	Latin language in ancient Rome
	Forms of Latin
	Late Latin literature
	Languages attested from the 3rd century
	3rd-century establishments
	Languages extinct in the 6th century
	6th-century disestablishments in Europe
	Languages of Sicily


Hidden categories: 	CS1: long volume value
	CS1 errors: missing periodical
	Articles with short description
	Short description matches Wikidata
	Use dmy dates from July 2020
	Articles containing Latin-language text
	Historical forms of languages with ISO codes
	Languages without ISO 639-3 code but with Glottolog code
	Language articles with unreferenced extinction date
	Wikipedia articles needing clarification from July 2010
	Articles containing French-language text
	CS1 French-language sources (fr)
	CS1 Latin-language sources (la)




	




	





	Navigation menu

	
		

	
		Personal tools
	

	
			Not logged in
	Talk
	Contributions
	Create account
	Log in


		
	



		
			

	
		Namespaces
	

	
			Article
	Talk


		
	



			

	
	
		Variants
	

	
		

		
	



		

		
			

	
		Views
	

	
			Read
	Edit
	View history


		
	



			

	
	
		More
	

	
		

		
	



			
	
		Search
	

	
		
			
			
			
			
		

	




		

	

	

	
		
	

	

	
		Navigation
	

	
			Main page
	Contents
	Current events
	Random article
	About Wikipedia
	Contact us
	Donate


		
	



	

	
		Contribute
	

	
			Help
	Learn to edit
	Community portal
	Recent changes
	Upload file


		
	




	
		Tools
	

	
			What links here
	Related changes
	Upload file
	Special pages
	Permanent link
	Page information
	Cite this page
	Wikidata item


		
	




	
		Print/export
	

	
			Download as PDF
	Printable version


		
	



	

	
		Languages
	

	
			العربية
	Català
	Deutsch
	Eesti
	Français
	Norsk bokmål
	Română
	Svenska
	Türkçe


		Edit links

	









		 This page was last edited on 19 December 2020, at 00:57 (UTC).
	Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License;
additional terms may apply.  By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



		Privacy policy
	About Wikipedia
	Disclaimers
	Contact Wikipedia
	Mobile view
	Developers
	Statistics
	Cookie statement