MIT License - Wikipedia MIT License From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Permissive free software license MIT License Publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology SPDX identifier MIT (see list for more)[1] Debian FSG compatible Yes[2] FSF approved Yes[3][4] OSI approved Yes[5] GPL compatible Yes[3][4] Copyleft No[3][4] Linking from code with a different licence Yes The MIT License is a permissive free software license originating at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)[7] in the late 1980s.[8] As a permissive license, it puts only very limited restriction on reuse and has, therefore, high license compatibility.[9][10] The Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons projects use the alternative name Expat License. The MIT license is compatible with many copyleft licenses, such as the GNU General Public License (GPL); MIT licensed software can be re-licensed as GPL software, and integrated with other GPL software, but not the other way around.[11] The MIT license also permits reuse within proprietary software, provided that either all copies of the licensed software include a copy of the MIT License terms and the copyright notice, or the software is re-licensed to remove this requirement. MIT-licensed software can also be re-licensed as proprietary software,[10][12] which distinguishes it from copyleft software licenses. As of 2020[update], MIT was the most popular software license found in one analysis,[13] continuing from reports in 2015 that MIT was the most popular software license on GitHub, ahead of any GPL variant and other free and open-source software (FOSS) licenses.[14] Notable projects that use the MIT License include the X Window System, Ruby on Rails, Nim, Node.js, Lua and jQuery. Notable companies using the MIT License include Microsoft (.NET Core), Google (Angular) and Facebook (React). Contents 1 License terms 2 Variations 2.1 X11 2.2 Other variations 3 Minor ambiguity and variants 4 Comparison to other licenses 4.1 BSD 4.2 GNU GPL 5 Relation to patents 6 Origins 7 Reception 8 See also 9 References 10 Further reading 11 External links License terms[edit] The MIT license has the identifier MIT in the SPDX License List.[15][16] It is also known as the "Expat License".[17] It has the following terms:[18] Copyright (c) Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE. Variations[edit] X11[edit] The X11 license, a variation of the MIT license, has the identifier X11 in the SPDX License List.[19][20] It is also known as the "MIT/X Consortium License" by the X Consortium (for X11).[21] It has the following terms:[22] Copyright (C) X Consortium Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE X CONSORTIUM BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE. Except as contained in this notice, the name of the X Consortium shall not be used in advertising or otherwise to promote the sale, use or other dealings in this Software without prior written authorization from the X Consortium. X Window System is a trademark of X Consortium, Inc. Other variations[edit] The SPDX License List contains extra MIT license variations. Examples include:[1] MIT-0, a variation with the attribution paragraph removed. MIT-advertising, a variation with an additional advertising clause. Minor ambiguity and variants[edit] Massachusetts Institute of Technology has been using many licenses for software since its creation, so the phrase "the MIT License" is theoretically ambiguous.[23] For example, MIT offers four licensing options for the FFTW[24] C source code library, one of which is the GPL v2.0 and the other three of which are not open-source. "MIT License" may refer to the Expat License (used for the XML parsing library Expat)[17] or to the X11 License (also called "MIT/X Consortium License"; used for X Window System by the MIT X Consortium).[20] The "MIT License" published by the Open Source Initiative[16] is the same as the "Expat License". The X Consortium was dissolved late in 1996, and its assets transferred to The Open Group,[25] which released X11R6 initially under the same license. The X11 License[20] and the X11R6 "MIT License" chosen for ncurses by the Free Software Foundation[26] both include the following clause, absent in the Expat License:[17] Except as contained in this notice, the name(s) of the above copyright holders shall not be used in advertising or otherwise to promote the sale, use or other dealings in this Software without prior written authorization. As of 2020, the successor to the X Window System is the X.Org Server, which is licensed under what is effectively the common MIT license, according to the X.org licensing page: The X.Org Foundation has chosen the following format of the MIT License as the preferred format for code included in the X Window System distribution. This is a slight variant of the common MIT license form published by the Open Source Initiative The "slight variant" is the addition of the phrase "(including the next paragraph)". Some ignore this history, referring to only one MIT license, as illustrated by GitHub's licensing advice and the legal text for the MIT License at GitHub's service choosealicense.com. Comparison to other licenses[edit] BSD[edit] The original BSD license also includes a clause requiring all advertising of the software to display a notice crediting its authors. This "advertising clause" (since disavowed by UC Berkeley[27]) is present in the modified MIT License used by XFree86. The University of Illinois/NCSA Open Source License combines text from both the MIT and BSD licenses; the license grant and disclaimer are taken from the MIT License. The ISC license contains similarities to both the MIT and simplified BSD licenses, the biggest difference being that language deemed unnecessary by the Berne Convention is omitted.[28][29] GNU GPL[edit] The GNU GPL is explicit about the patent grant an author would be giving when the code (or derivative work) is distributed,[30] the MIT license does not discuss patents. Moreover, the GPL license impacts "derivative works", but the MIT license does not. Relation to patents[edit] Like the BSD license, the MIT license does not include an express patent license although some commentators[31][32] state that the grant of rights covers all potential restrictions including patents. Both the BSD and the MIT licenses were drafted before the patentability of software was generally recognized under US law.[33] The Apache License version 2.0[3] is a similarly permissive license that includes an explicit contributor's patent license. Of specific relevance to US jurisdictions, the MIT license uses the terms "sell" and "use" that are also used in defining the rights of a patent holder in Title 35 of the United States Code section 154. This has been construed by some commentators[34][35] as an unconventional but implicit license in the US to use any underlying patents. Origins[edit] One of the originators of the MIT license, computer scientist Jerry Saltzer, has published his recollections of its early development, along with documentary evidence.[36] See also.[8] Reception[edit] As of 2020[update], according to WhiteSource Software[13] the MIT license was used in 27% of four million open source packages. As of 2015[update], according to Black Duck Software[37][better source needed] and a 2015 blog[14] from GitHub, the MIT license was the most popular free software license, with the GNU GPLv2 coming second in their sample of repositories. See also[edit] Free and open-source software portal Comparison of free and open-source software licenses ISC license – similar to the MIT license, but with language deemed unnecessary removed Category:Software using the MIT license References[edit] ^ a b "SPDX License List". spdx.org. SPDX Working Group. ^ "License information". The Debian Project. Software in the Public Interest (published July 12, 2017). 1997–2017. Archived from the original on July 20, 2017. Retrieved July 20, 2017. ... This page presents the opinion of some debian-legal contributors on how certain licenses follow the Debian Free Software Guidelines (DFSG). ... Licenses currently found in Debian main include: ... Expat/MIT-style licenses ... ^ a b c d "Various Licenses and Comments about Them". The GNU Project. Free Software Foundation (published April 4, 2017). 2014–2017. Expat License. Archived from the original on July 20, 2017. Retrieved July 20, 2017. ... This is a lax, permissive non-copyleft free software license, compatible with the GNU GPL. It is sometimes ambiguously referred to as the MIT License. ... ^ a b c "Various Licenses and Comments about Them". The GNU Project. Free Software Foundation (published April 4, 2017). 2014–2017. X11 License. Archived from the original on July 20, 2017. Retrieved July 20, 2017. ... This is a lax permissive non-copyleft free software license, compatible with the GNU GPL. ... This license is sometimes called the MIT license, but that term is misleading, since MIT has used many licenses for software. ... ^ "Licenses by Name". Open Source Initiative. n.d. Archived from the original on July 20, 2017. Retrieved July 20, 2017. ... The following licenses have been approved by the OSI. ... ... MIT License (MIT) ... ^ Certified Copyfree Licenses ^ Lawrence Rosen, OPEN SOURCE LICENSING, p.85 (Prentice Hall PTR, 1st ed. 2004) ^ a b "The mysterious history of the MIT License". opensource.com. opensource.com. Retrieved July 30, 2019. The date? The best single answer is probably 1987. But the complete story is more complicated and even a little mysterious. [...] Precursors from 1985. The X Consortium or X11 License variant from 1987. Or the Expat License from 1998 or 1999. ^ Hanwell, Marcus D. (January 28, 2014). "Should I use a permissive license? Copyleft? Or something in the middle?". opensource.com. Retrieved May 30, 2015. Permissive licensing simplifies things One reason the business world, and more and more developers [...], favor permissive licenses is in the simplicity of reuse. The license usually only pertains to the source code that is licensed and makes no attempt to infer any conditions upon any other component, and because of this there is no need to define what constitutes a derived work. I have also never seen a license compatibility chart for permissive licenses; it seems that they are all compatible. ^ a b "Licence Compatibility and Interoperability". Open-Source Software - Develop, share, and reuse open source software for public administrations. joinup.ec.europa.eu. Archived from the original on June 17, 2015. Retrieved May 30, 2015. The licences for distributing free or open source software (FOSS) are divided in two families: permissive and copyleft. Permissive licences (BSD, MIT, X11, Apache, Zope) are generally compatible and interoperable with most other licences, tolerating to merge, combine or improve the covered code and to re-distribute it under many licences (including non-free or 'proprietary'). ^ "Various Licenses and Comments about Them". Free Software Foundation. Retrieved July 17, 2013. ^ "Paid software includes MIT licensed library, does that put my app under MIT too?". stackexchange.com. Retrieved July 21, 2021. ^ a b "Open Source Licenses in 2020: Trends and Predictions". May 3, 2020. Archived from the original on May 3, 2020. Retrieved May 3, 2020. ^ a b Balter, Ben (March 9, 2015). "Open source license usage on GitHub.com". github.com. Retrieved November 21, 2015. 1 MIT 44.69%, 2 Other 15.68% ^ "MIT License". spdx.org. SPDX Working Group. ^ a b "Open Source Initiative OSI – The MIT License:Licensing". Open Source Initiative. Retrieved December 5, 2010. ^ a b c "Various Licenses and Comments about Them#Expat License". Free Software Foundation. Retrieved December 5, 2010. ^ "MIT License Explained in Plain English - TLDRLegal". tldrlegal.com. Retrieved July 7, 2021. ^ "X11 License". spdx.org. SPDX Working Group. ^ a b c "Various Licenses and Comments about Them#X11 License". Free Software Foundation. Retrieved December 5, 2010. ^ "3.3. X Consortium", 3. X/MIT Licenses, The XFree86 Project, March 2004 ^ "X11 License Explained in Plain English - TLDRLegal". tldrlegal.com. Retrieved March 26, 2021. ^ "Various Licenses and Comments about Them". GNU Project. Retrieved July 17, 2020. ^ "FFTW - Fastest Fourier Transform in the West". Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Retrieved July 17, 2020. ^ Dickey, Thomas E. "Copyrights/comments". Retrieved October 6, 2020. ^ Dickey, Thomas E. "NCURSES — Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)". ^ "To All Licensees, Distributors of Any Version of BSD". University of California, Berkeley. July 22, 1999. Retrieved November 15, 2006. ^ "Copyright Policy". OpenBSD. Retrieved June 6, 2016. The ISC copyright is functionally equivalent to a two-term BSD copyright with language removed that is made unnecessary by the Berne convention. ^ de Raadt, Theo (March 21, 2008). "Re: BSD Documentation License?". openbsd-misc (Mailing list). ^ "Patents and GPLv3 - FSFE". FSFE - Free Software Foundation Europe. Retrieved December 1, 2020. ^ "Why so little love for the patent grant in the MIT License?". January 23, 2021. Archived from the original on January 23, 2021. Retrieved January 23, 2021. ^ "Free and open source software and your patents". May 3, 2020. Archived from the original on May 3, 2020. Retrieved May 3, 2020. ^ Stern and Allen, Open Source Licensing, p. 495 in Understanding the Intellectual Property License 2013 (Practicing Law Institute 2013) ^ "The MIT License, Line by Line". May 3, 2020. Archived from the original on May 3, 2020. Retrieved May 3, 2020. ^ Christian H. Nadan (2009), "Closing the Loophole: Open Source Licensing & the Implied Patent License", The Computer & Internet Lawyer, Aspen Law & Business, 26 (8), By using patent terms like "deal in", "use", and "sell", the MIT license grant is more likely to be deemed to include express patent rights than the BSD license. ^ Saltzer, Jerome H (November 18, 2020). "The origin of the "MIT license"". IEEE Annals of the History of Computing. 42 (4): 94–98. doi:10.1109/MAHC.2020.3020234. ISSN 1934-1547. Retrieved November 28, 2020. ^ "Top 20 licenses". Black Duck Software. November 19, 2015. Archived from the original on September 4, 2013. Retrieved November 19, 2015. 1. MIT license 24%, 2. GNU General Public License (GPL) 2.0 23% Further reading[edit] Mitchell, Kyle E. (September 21, 2016). "The MIT License, Line by Line". /dev/lawyer. Archived from the original on September 28, 2016. Retrieved September 28, 2016. External links[edit] MIT License variants The MIT License template (Open Source Initiative official site) Expat License X11 License v t e Free and open-source software General Alternative terms for free software Comparison of open-source and closed-source software Comparison of source-code-hosting facilities Free software Free software project directories Gratis versus libre Long-term support Open-source software Open-source software development Outline Timeline Software packages Audio Bioinformatics Codecs Configuration management Drivers Graphics Wireless Geophysics Health Mathematics Office Suites Operating systems Programming languages Routing Television Video games Web applications E-commerce Android apps iOS apps Commercial Trademarked Formerly proprietary Formerly open-source Community Free software movement History Open-source-software movement Organizations Events Licenses AFL Apache APSL Artistic Beerware BSD Creative Commons CDDL EPL Free Software Foundation GNU GPL GNU LGPL ISC MIT MPL Python Python Software Foundation License Shared Source Initiative Sleepycat Unlicense WTFPL zlib Types and standards Comparison of licenses Contributor License Agreement Copyleft Debian Free Software Guidelines Definition of Free Cultural Works Free license The Free Software Definition The Open Source Definition Open-source license Permissive software license Public domain Viral license Challenges Digital rights management Hardware restrictions License proliferation Mozilla software rebranding Proprietary device drivers Proprietary firmware Proprietary software SCO/Linux controversies Software patents Software security Trusted Computing Related topics Forking GNU Manifesto Microsoft Open Specification Promise Open-core model Open-source hardware Shared Source Initiative Source-available software The Cathedral and the Bazaar Revolution OS Portal Category Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MIT_License&oldid=1037570390" Categories: Free and open-source software licenses Permissive software licenses Massachusetts Institute of Technology software X Window System Massachusetts Institute of Technology Hidden categories: Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata Use American English from March 2021 All Wikipedia articles written in American English Use mdy dates from March 2021 Articles containing potentially dated statements from 2020 All articles containing potentially dated statements Articles containing potentially dated statements from 2015 All articles lacking reliable references Articles lacking reliable references from November 2016 Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages العربية Bân-lâm-gú Български Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Español Esperanto فارسی Français Galego 한국어 Bahasa Indonesia Italiano עברית Кыргызча Latviešu മലയാളം Bahasa Melayu Nederlands 日本語 Norsk bokmål Polski Português Русский Shqip Simple English Slovenčina Slovenščina Српски / srpski Suomi Svenska ไทย Türkçe Українська Tiếng Việt 中文 Edit links This page was last edited on 7 August 2021, at 10:57 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement