id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
en-wikipedia-org-7649		View source for Trust (social science) - Wikipedia			.html	text/html	1438	165	68	In this sense, some philosophers such as Lagerspetz argue that trust is a kind of reliance, though not merely reliance.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Lagerspetz|first=Olli|date=1998|title=Trust: The Tacit Demand|url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8986-4|journal=Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy|volume=1|doi=10.1007/978-94-015-8986-4|isbn=978-90-481-4963-6|issn=1387-6678}}</ref> [[Diego Gambetta|Gambetta]] argued it is the inherent belief that others generally have good intentions which is the foundation for our reliance on them.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Gambetta|first=Diego|date=2000|title=Can We Trust Trust?|journal=Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations|publisher=Department of Sociology, University of Oxford|pages=213–237}}</ref> Philosophers such as [[Annette Baier]] have contended this view, establishing a difference between trust and reliance by saying that trust can be betrayed, whilst reliance can only be disappointed (Baier 1986, 235).<ref>{{cite journal|author=Baier, Annette|date=1986|title=Trust and Antitrust|journal=Ethics|volume=96 | issue = 2 |pages=231–260|jstor=2381376|doi=10.1086/292745|s2cid=159454549}}</ref> Carolyn McLeod explains Baier's argument by giving the following examples: we can rely on our clock to give the time, but we do not feel betrayed when it breaks, thus, we cannot say that we trusted it; we are not trusting when we are suspicious of the other person, because this is in fact an expression of distrust (McLeod 2006).<ref name=":3">{{cite book|url=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2015/entries/trust/|title=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy|first=Carolyn|last=McLeod|editor-first=Edward N.|editor-last=Zalta|year=2017|publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University|accessdate=29 October 2017|via=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy}}</ref> The violation of trust warrants this sense of betrayal.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Hawley|first=Katherine|date=2012-10-25|title=Trust, Distrust and Commitment|url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nous.12000|journal=Noûs|volume=48|issue=1|pages=1–20|doi=10.1111/nous.12000|hdl=10023/3430|issn=0029-4624}}</ref> Thus, trust is different from reliance in the sense that a trustor accepts the risk of being betrayed.	./cache/en-wikipedia-org-7649.html	./txt/en-wikipedia-org-7649.txt